input_seq2seq
stringlengths
40
578
output_seq2seq
stringlengths
10
929
premise: A woman is walking across the street eating a banana, while a man is following with his briefcase. hypothesis: the woman is a seductress.
neutral: The woman's actions to not imply any personal information about her. Now it is known that she is a seductress.
premise: A woman is walking across the street eating a banana, while a man is following with his briefcase. hypothesis: a woman sits for lunch.
contradiction: One cannot walks and sits at the same time.
premise: A woman is walking across the street eating a banana, while a man is following with his briefcase. hypothesis: the woman is having coffee at the cafe.
contradiction: one cannot have coffee and banana at the same time.
premise: A woman is walking across the street eating a banana, while a man is following with his briefcase. hypothesis: The woman is eating a banana.
entailment: The woman is eating the banana while she walks across the street.
premise: A woman is walking across the street eating a banana, while a man is following with his briefcase. hypothesis: the woman is outside.
entailment: You have to be outside to be walking across the street.
premise: A skier slides along a metal rail. hypothesis: A skier is near the rail looking down.
neutral: Sentence 1: A skier slides along a metal rail. Sentence 2: A skier is near the rail looking down.
premise: A skier slides along a metal rail. hypothesis: A skier is near the rail.
entailment: The skier would have to be near the rail to slide along the metal rail.
premise: A skier slides along a metal rail. hypothesis: A skier is away from the rail.
contradiction: A slider can slide along or away from the rail.
premise: A person on skis on a rail at night. hypothesis: The woman eats a car.
contradiction: A person can be man or woman.
premise: A person on skis on a rail at night. hypothesis: The person skiis.
entailment: If the person skiis, then a person is on skis.
premise: A person on skis on a rail at night. hypothesis: They are fantastic skiiers.
neutral: Sentence 1: A person on skis on a rail at night. Sentence 2: They are fantastic skiiers.
premise: A skier in electric green on the edge of a ramp made of metal bars. hypothesis: The skier was on the edge of the ramp.
neutral: Sentence 1: A skier in electric green on the edge of a ramp made of metal bars. Sentence 2: The skier was on the edge of the ramp.
premise: A skier in electric green on the edge of a ramp made of metal bars. hypothesis: The brightly dressed skier slid down the race course.
entailment: If a skier is wearing electric green, then they are brightly dressed. It is logical that a skier slid down down something. A ramp is found at a race course.
premise: A skier in electric green on the edge of a ramp made of metal bars. hypothesis: The jogger ran through the streets.
contradiction: A jogger and a skier are two different types of people.
premise: A yellow uniformed skier is performing a trick across a railed object. hypothesis: A snowboarder is riding a ski lift.
contradiction: A snowboarder and skier are two different types of people. Someone cannot be performing a trick and riding on something simultaneously.
premise: A yellow uniformed skier is performing a trick across a railed object. hypothesis: A skier is competing in a competition.
neutral: Sentence 1: A yellow uniformed skier is performing a trick across a railed object. Sentence 2: A skier is competing in a competition.
premise: A yellow uniformed skier is performing a trick across a railed object. hypothesis: Somebody is engaging in winter sports.
entailment: If a skier is performing a trick, then they are engaging in winter sports.
premise: A blond man is drinking from a public fountain. hypothesis: The man is drinking water.
entailment: Water is what a public fountain contains.
premise: A blond man is drinking from a public fountain. hypothesis: The man is very thirsty.
neutral: Sentence 1: A blond man is drinking from a public fountain. Sentence 2: The man is very thirsty.
premise: A blond man is drinking from a public fountain. hypothesis: The man is drinking coffee.
contradiction: A public fountain contains water, which is different than coffee.
premise: Wet brown dog swims towards camera. hypothesis: The dog is sleeping in his bed.
contradiction: A dog cannot be sleeping while he swims.
premise: Wet brown dog swims towards camera. hypothesis: A dog is playing fetch in a pond.
neutral: Sentence 1: Wet brown dog swims towards camera. Sentence 2: A dog is playing fetch in a pond.
premise: Wet brown dog swims towards camera. hypothesis: A dog is in the water.
entailment: If a dog swims, then he is in the water.
premise: Closeup image of a dog swimming. hypothesis: A cat reluctantly takes a bath.
contradiction: A dog and a cat are two different animals. An animal cannot be swimming while it takes a bath.
premise: Closeup image of a dog swimming. hypothesis: An underwater camera takes a photo of a puppy.
neutral: Sentence 1: Closeup image of a dog swimming. Sentence 2: An underwater camera takes a photo of a puppy.
premise: Closeup image of a dog swimming. hypothesis: A dog swims in a body of water.
entailment: If a dog swims, then he is swimming.
premise: The furry brown dog is swimming in the ocean. hypothesis: A dog is chasing a fish.
neutral: Sentence 1: The furry brown dog is swimming in the ocean. Sentence 2: A dog is chasing a fish.
premise: The furry brown dog is swimming in the ocean. hypothesis: A dog is swimming.
entailment: "Swimming" is a less detailed restatement of "swimming in the ocean.".
premise: The furry brown dog is swimming in the ocean. hypothesis: A dog is running around the yard.
contradiction: A dog cannot be swimming and running simultaneously.
premise: A big brown dog swims towards the camera. hypothesis: A dog is chasing a stick.
contradiction: A dog cannot be chasing something as he swims.
premise: A big brown dog swims towards the camera. hypothesis: A photographer is taking pictures of a dog.
neutral: Sentence 1: A big brown dog swims towards the camera. Sentence 2: A photographer is taking pictures of a dog.
premise: A big brown dog swims towards the camera. hypothesis: A dog swims towards the camera.
entailment: "A dog" is a less detailed restatement of a "big brown dog.".
premise: A man wearing black with a gray hat, holding a pitchfork, directs a horse-drawn cart. hypothesis: The farmer wearing a gray hat is driving a horse-drawn cart.
neutral: Sentence 1: A man wearing black with a gray hat, holding a pitchfork, directs a horse-drawn cart. Sentence 2: The farmer wearing a gray hat is driving a horse-drawn cart.
premise: A man wearing black with a gray hat, holding a pitchfork, directs a horse-drawn cart. hypothesis: The man with the gray hat and pitchfork is directing the cart.
entailment: If a man is wearing a gray hat, then he is with the gray hat. If a man is holding a pitchfork, then he is with a pitchfork. "Directing the cart" is a less detailed restatement of "directs a horse-drawn cart.".
premise: A man wearing black with a gray hat, holding a pitchfork, directs a horse-drawn cart. hypothesis: The woman in a blue dress is hitching a horse to a cart.
contradiction: A man and a woman are two separate genders. A person cannot be hitching something while he directs. A horse-drawn cart already has a horse attached, so you cannot attach a horse to a cart simultaneously.
premise: A man is leading a Clydesdale up a hay road, within a Old Country. hypothesis: A man is walking with his horse up a country road.
entailment: A Clydesdale is a horse. A hay road within an Old Country would be a country road.
premise: A man is leading a Clydesdale up a hay road, within a Old Country. hypothesis: A woman in a gray business suit is drinking tea.
contradiction: A man and a woman are two different genders. One cannot be leading a Clydesdale while drinking tea simultaneously.
premise: A man is leading a Clydesdale up a hay road, within a Old Country. hypothesis: A man in a straw hat and overalls is walking with his horse up a country road.
neutral: A man in a straw hat and overalls doesn't necessary to walking with his horse up a country road.
premise: A farmer fertilizing his garden with manure with a horse and wagon. hypothesis: The man is fertilizering his garden.
entailment: A man can be a farmer.
premise: A farmer fertilizing his garden with manure with a horse and wagon. hypothesis: The man is on the city street with his horse and wagon.
contradiction: The wagon is either in a garden or on a city street.
premise: A farmer fertilizing his garden with manure with a horse and wagon. hypothesis: The man is in an open field with a horse and wagon.
neutral: A farmer in his garden is not the same as being in a field.
premise: A white horse is pulling a cart while a man stands and watches. hypothesis: A horse is hauling goods.
neutral: The cart does not necessarily have to be filled with goods, as it could be empty.
premise: A white horse is pulling a cart while a man stands and watches. hypothesis: An animal is walking outside.
entailment: A horse is an animal, a horse must be walking when pulling a cart.
premise: A white horse is pulling a cart while a man stands and watches. hypothesis: A man is watching a horse race.
contradiction: a horse race is a different activity from a horse pulling a cart.
premise: A small group of church-goers watch a choir practice. hypothesis: A group watches a practice.
entailment: church-goers is a group so the sentences are the same.
premise: A small group of church-goers watch a choir practice. hypothesis: The pastor and elders watch the choir to make sure they are good.
neutral: The pastor and elders watch the choir they doesn't need to make it sure they are good.
premise: A dog drops a red disc on a beach. hypothesis: a dog catch the ball on a beach.
contradiction: If a dog drops something, he cannot catch it at the same time. A disc and a ball are two different objects.
premise: A dog drops a red disc on a beach. hypothesis: a dog drops a disc with a boy.
neutral: a dog doesn't need a boy to drops a disc with.
premise: A dog drops a red disc on a beach. hypothesis: a dog drops a red disc.
entailment: On a beach is a description that can be left out without substantially changing the meaning.
premise: A man and a woman are walking on a street at the top of a hill. hypothesis: A married couple walks atop a hill.
neutral: Anyone could walks a top of hill doesn't necessarily to be couple.
premise: A man and a woman are walking on a street at the top of a hill. hypothesis: A man and woman walk on a street.
entailment: At the top of a hill is a description that does not change the meaning significantly.
premise: A man and a woman are walking on a street at the top of a hill. hypothesis: Two men play catch on a hill.
contradiction: A man and a woman is not the same as two men. Walking and playing catch is different.
premise: An elderly man is drinking orange juice at a cafe. hypothesis: An elderly man is drinking apple juice at a bar.
contradiction: Drinking orange juice at a cafe is not the same as drinking apple juice at a bar. Two different drinks, two different locales.
premise: An elderly man is drinking orange juice at a cafe. hypothesis: An older gentleman is enjoying his orange juice at a new cafe.
neutral: An older gentleman could enjoy anything at new cafe it doesn't has to be orange juice.
premise: An elderly man is drinking orange juice at a cafe. hypothesis: An old man is enjoying a beverage at a cafe.
entailment: Elderly is the same as old and orange juice is a beverage.
premise: A couple holding hands walks down a street. hypothesis: Two men hold hands while walking down the street.
neutral: Two men holds hands , walking down the street is unnecessary.
premise: A couple holding hands walks down a street. hypothesis: There are people sitting on the side of the road.
contradiction: The couple can either be walking down a street or sitting at side of road, not both simultaneously.
premise: A couple holding hands walks down a street. hypothesis: People are holding hands and walking.
entailment: A couple are people.
premise: A couple walk through a white brick town. hypothesis: People are walking outdoors.
entailment: A white brick town is outdoors.
premise: A couple walk through a white brick town. hypothesis: A man and woman walk in a brown brick city.
contradiction: The town or city can not be described as being built of white brick, then as being built of brown brick. It can be one color or the other, or a mix of bricks.
premise: A couple walk through a white brick town. hypothesis: A man and woman walk through a big city.
neutral: A man and woman walk , a big city is unnecessary.
premise: Children going home from school. hypothesis: The children are at the library.
contradiction: If the children are going home and they cannot still be in library.
premise: Children going home from school. hypothesis: The school children head home.
entailment: The children headed home from school are also school children.
premise: Children going home from school. hypothesis: The children are walking in the afternooon.
neutral: It cannot be inferred that the children are walking or that it is afternoon.
premise: People listening to a choir in a Catholic church. hypothesis: People are listening to a metal band.
contradiction: Music from a church choir is very different from metal band music.
premise: People listening to a choir in a Catholic church. hypothesis: Choir singing in mass.
entailment: People listening to a choir, who is singing in mass of a Catholic church.
premise: People listening to a choir in a Catholic church. hypothesis: People are in mass for a first communion.
neutral: People are in mass they doesn't need to be in communion.
premise: Bicyclists waiting at an intersection. hypothesis: A bicyclist is sitting down having lunch at the mall.
contradiction: THE BICYCLIST IS EITHER SITTING DOWN HAVING LUNCH OR WAITING AT AN INTERSECTION.
premise: Bicyclists waiting at an intersection. hypothesis: The bicyclists are outside.
entailment: An intersection is outside.
premise: Bicyclists waiting at an intersection. hypothesis: Bicyclists waiting for a car to pass.
neutral: You can not infer they are waiting for a car.
premise: Bicyclists waiting at an intersection. hypothesis: A person on a bike is waiting while the light is green.
neutral: A person is waiting while the light is green they doesn't need to be on bike.
premise: Bicyclists waiting at an intersection. hypothesis: The bicycles are on a road.
entailment: An intersection is on a road.
premise: Bicyclists waiting at an intersection. hypothesis: A person on a bike is near a street.
entailment: An intersection is part of a street.
premise: Bicyclists waiting at an intersection. hypothesis: Bikers stop and wait for traffic at the intersection.
entailment: Waiting implies that they stopped.
premise: Bicyclists waiting at an intersection. hypothesis: The bicyclists ride through the mall on their bikes.
contradiction: Cyclists cannot be immobile waiting and in motion riding simultaneously. There are no intersections at a mall.
premise: Bicyclists waiting at an intersection. hypothesis: Bicyclists waiting their turn to cross.
entailment: People cross at an intersection.
premise: Bicyclists waiting at an intersection. hypothesis: Bicyclists riding along a freeway.
contradiction: Cyclists cannot be immobile waiting and in motion riding simultaneously. There are no intersections on a freeway.
premise: Bicyclists waiting at an intersection. hypothesis: The bicyclists are dead.
contradiction: To be described as waiting is to be assumed as being alive to be able to wait. Dead bicyclists do not wait.
premise: Bicyclists waiting at an intersection. hypothesis: The bicyclists are riding to the book store.
neutral: The bicyclists are could be riding anywhere it doesn't has to be book store.
premise: Bicyclists waiting at an intersection. hypothesis: The bicyclists are in a race.
neutral: No all bicyclists are in a race.
premise: Bicyclists waiting at an intersection. hypothesis: The bicyclists are at home.
contradiction: There is no intersection in a home. The cyclist cannot be two places at once.
premise: Bicyclists waiting at an intersection. hypothesis: A group of bicyclists remain on the sidewalk at the intersection.
neutral: Just because a bicyclists is waiting at an intersection doesn't imply that they are on a sidewalk.
premise: People waiting at a light on bikes. hypothesis: A bunch of friends are on a boat.
contradiction: There are no stoplights on a boat.
premise: People waiting at a light on bikes. hypothesis: People with bikes.
entailment: With bikes is a restatement of on bikes.
premise: People waiting at a light on bikes. hypothesis: There are people on bikes at a light.
neutral: Not all people are waiting on bikes at a light .
premise: People waiting at a light on bikes. hypothesis: The people are inside waiting.
contradiction: People are not bikes.
premise: People waiting at a light on bikes. hypothesis: There are some people outside.
entailment: A light is outside.
premise: People waiting at a light on bikes. hypothesis: People are on their bikes.
entailment: On their bikes is a restatement of on bikes.
premise: People waiting at a light on bikes. hypothesis: The people are riding their bikes to the gym.
neutral: Not all people waiting at lights are riding their bikes to get to the gym.
premise: People waiting at a light on bikes. hypothesis: People biking through the city.
neutral: Not a lights are only in the city.
premise: People waiting at a light on bikes. hypothesis: The people are on bikes.
entailment: Are on bikes is a restatement of on bikes.
premise: People waiting at a light on bikes. hypothesis: There is traffic next to the bikes.
neutral: No all bikes waiting at lights have traffic next to them.
premise: People waiting at a light on bikes. hypothesis: The people are running a red light.
contradiction: Waiting implies that one is in an area. Running implies leaving an area.
premise: People waiting at a light on bikes. hypothesis: People in a car race.
contradiction: Bikes cannot be included in a car race.
premise: People waiting at a light on bikes. hypothesis: Men and women outside on a street corner.
entailment: Men and women are people.
premise: People waiting at a light on bikes. hypothesis: A ladybug has landed on a beautiful pink rose.
contradiction: A ladybug cannot ride a bike.
premise: People waiting at a light on bikes. hypothesis: Men and women on their motorcycles, wearing helmets and protective jackets.
neutral: Not all bikes are considered motorcycles. Not all people using bikes wear helmets and protective jackets.
premise: People on bicycles waiting at an intersection. hypothesis: The people are on skateboards.
contradiction: The people are either on skateboards or bicycles.
premise: People on bicycles waiting at an intersection. hypothesis: People are riding their bicycles.
entailment: PEOPLE ARE WAITING AT AN INTERSECTION,WHILE RIDING THEIR BICYCLES.
premise: People on bicycles waiting at an intersection. hypothesis: There is a bike race happening right now.
neutral: People on bicycles doesn't necessarily imply bike race.