text
stringlengths
8
257
label
int32
0
1
entertainment opportunism at its most glaring
0
an inconsistent , meandering , and sometimes dry plot
0
somewhat short
0
insightful enough to be fondly remembered in the endlessly challenging maze of moviegoing
1
if the film has a problem , its shortness disappoints : you want the story to go on and on
1
a formula comedy redeemed by its stars
1
has just as many scenes that are lean and tough enough to fit in any modern action movie
1
make an important film about human infidelity and happenstance that he tosses a kitchen sink onto a story already overladen with plot conceits
0
look too deep into the story
0
treads heavily
0
romp of a film .
1
is a movie that puts itself squarely in the service of the lovers who inhabit it .
1
genteel and unsurprising the execution
1
dishonest and
0
's always these rehashes to feed to the younger generations
1
, it 's pretty stupid .
0
in the new release of cinema paradiso , the tale has turned from sweet to bittersweet , and when the tears come during that final , beautiful scene , they finally feel absolutely earned .
1
is a refreshingly smart and newfangled variation on several themes derived from far less sophisticated and knowing horror films
1
gets close to the chimps the same way goodall did , with a serious minded patience , respect and affection .
1
has all the enjoyable randomness of a very lively dream and so manages to be compelling , amusing and unsettling at the same time .
1
come away from his film overwhelmed , hopeful and , perhaps paradoxically , illuminated .
1
shatner is probably the funniest person in the film , which gives you an idea just how bad it was .
0
though overall an overwhelmingly positive portrayal , the film does n't ignore the more problematic aspects of brown 's life .
1
could have been much stronger
0
is silly beyond comprehension
0
to face frightening late fees
0
hokum but
0
can smell the grease on the plot
0
twohy knows how to inflate the mundane into the scarifying , and gets full mileage out of the rolling of a stray barrel or the unexpected blast of a phonograph record .
1
's such a mechanical endeavor ( that ) it never bothers to question why somebody might devote time to see it .
0
could bond while watching a walk to remember .
1
watch your merchant ivory productions
1
civil disobedience , anti-war movements and the power of strong voices
1
even if you 've seen `` stomp '' ( the stage show ) , you still have to see this !
1
there are n't too many films that can be as simultaneously funny , offbeat and heartwarming ( without a thick shmear of the goo , at least ) , but
1
unassuming , subordinate
0
is a diverting -- if predictable -- adventure suitable for a matinee , with a message that cautions children about disturbing the world 's delicate ecological balance .
1
, with increasingly amused irony , the relationship between reluctant captors and befuddled captives .
1
be exploring the idea of why human beings long for what they do n't have , and how this gets us in trouble
1
's hard to imagine anyone managing to steal a movie not only from charismatic rising star jake gyllenhaal but also from accomplished oscar winners susan sarandon , dustin hoffman and holly hunter , yet newcomer ellen pompeo pulls off the feat with aplomb .
1
will probably be in wedgie heaven .
0
did n't mean much to me and played too skewed to ever get a hold on
0
to tell which is in more abundant supply in this woefully hackneyed movie , directed by scott kalvert , about street gangs and turf wars in 1958 brooklyn -- stale cliches , gratuitous violence , or empty machismo
0
there is little question that this is a serious work by an important director who has something new to say about how , in the flip-flop of courtship , we often reel in when we should be playing out .
1
go see this delightful comedy
1
got some good , organic character work , lots of obvious political insights and little room for engaging , imaginative filmmaking in its nearly 2 1/2 - hour , dissipated length .
1
'' succeeds due to its rapid-fire delivery and enough inspired levity that it ca n't be dismissed as mindless .
1
the movie is amateurish , but
0
much to absorb and even more to think about after the final frame
1
the only excitement comes when the credits finally roll and you get to leave the theater .
0
as enlightening , insightful and entertaining as grant 's two best films
1
human experience -- drama , conflict , tears and surprise -- that it transcends the normal divisions between fiction and nonfiction film
1
captivates as it shows excess in business and pleasure , allowing us to find the small , human moments , and leaving off with a grand whimper .
1
the director 's many dodges and turns add up to little more than a screenful of gamesmanship that 's low on both suspense and payoff .
0
, you 'll swear that you 've seen it all before , even if you 've never come within a mile of the longest yard .
0
for most of its footage , the new thriller proves that director m. night shyamalan can weave an eerie spell and that mel gibson can gasp , shudder and even tremble without losing his machismo .
1
to conceive of anyone who has reached puberty actually finding the characters in slackers or their antics amusing , let alone funny
0
of clich茅s , depression and bad alternative music
0
fill the hot chick , the latest gimmick from this unimaginative comedian
0
whose sharp
1
a period story about a catholic boy who tries to help a jewish friend get into heaven by sending the audience straight to hell .
0
the widowmaker is derivative , overlong , and bombastic -- yet surprisingly entertaining .
1
in this engaging film about two men who discover what william james once called ` the gift of tears
1
offers no new insight on the matter , nor do its characters exactly spring to life .
0
a distinctly minor effort that will be seen to better advantage on cable , especially considering its barely
0
fierce grandeur
1
capturing the precarious balance between the extravagant confidence of the exiled aristocracy and the cruel earnestness of the victorious revolutionaries
1
drag an audience
0
it can not even be dubbed hedonistic
0
exceptionally
1
takes a simple premise and carries it to unexpected heights .
1
is headed down the toilet with the ferocity of a frozen burrito after an all-night tequila bender
0
guide a loose , poorly structured film through the pitfalls of incoherence and redundancy
0
furiously , their capacity to explain themselves has gone the same way as their natural instinct for self-preservation
0
a creepy , intermittently powerful study of a self-destructive man ... about as unsettling to watch as an exploratory medical procedure or an autopsy .
1
that a man in drag is not in and of himself funny
0
does somehow manage to get you under its spell .
1
the line between sappy and sanguine
1
stands still in more ways that one in clockstoppers , a sci-fi thriller as lazy as it is interminable .
0
an incredibly layered and stylistic film that , despite a fairly slow paced , almost humdrum approach to character development , still manages at least a decent attempt at meaningful cinema
1
a predictable outcome and
0
why not invite some genuine spontaneity into the film by having the evil aliens ' laser guns actually hit something for once ?
0
has a wooden delivery and
0
pay reparations to viewers
0
ordinary
0
laughs and insight into one of the toughest ages a kid can go through .
1
hollywood has taken quite a nosedive from alfred hitchcock 's imaginative flight to shyamalan 's self-important summer fluff .
0
this oddly sweet comedy
1
most savagely hilarious
1
are lukewarm and quick to pass .
0
a fairly weak retooling
0
a funny and well-contructed black comedy where the old adage `` be careful what you wish for '' is given a full workout .
1
to be something of a sitcom apparatus
0
you drive past -- even if it chiefly inspires you to drive a little faster
1
and , thanks to the presence of ` the king , ' it also rocks .
1
perfectly pleasant if slightly pokey comedy
1
the ways in which extravagant chance can distort our perspective and throw us off the path of good sense
0
represents glossy hollywood at its laziest
0
thanks largely to williams , all the interesting developments are processed in 60 minutes -- the rest is just an overexposed waste of film
0
is it possible for a documentary to be utterly entranced by its subject and still show virtually no understanding of it
0