Datasets:

AshtonIsNotHere

/

biosift-nli

like 2

Usefulness of repeated recombinant human thyrotropin-stimulated thyroglobulin test in the post-surgical follow-up of very low-risk patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma.

The European Thyroid Association (ETA) and the American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines identify subgroups of patients affected by thyroid carcinoma in whom, due to a low risk of recurrence, radioiodine ablation is not indicated. These patients are referred to as "very low-risk" according to the ETA consensus and "low-risk" patients according to the ATA guidelines. The recommended post-surgical follow-up of these patients is based upon periodical measurements of serum thyroglobulin (Tg) on levothyroxine therapy and neck ultrasound (US). To evaluate the usefulness of recombinant human (rh)-TSH Tg test and its repetition 2-3 yr afterwards in very low-risk patients. We consecutively enrolled 32 patients with undetectable anti-Tg antibodies. Basal serum Tg levels was undetectable in all patients. Following rhTSH serum Tg remained undetectable in 23 (71.9%) patients (UP) and was >1.0 ng/ml in 9 (DP). US and whole body scan, revealed lymph node metastasis in 4/9 DP patients. A second rhTSH stimulation test (36.9±3.5 months later) was performed in all UP and in 5 DP patients without proven recurrences. All the UP and 4/5 formerly DP patients showed undetectable Tg stimulation. Our results suggest that rhTSH Tg test may be helpful in very low-risk patients, given its ability to differentiate those who may be considered "free of disease" from those who require further investigation and treatment. Repeated rhTSH Tg tests may be indicated only in patients with detectable serum Tg at prior stimulation testing.

This study has a target drug

Usefulness of repeated recombinant human thyrotropin-stimulated thyroglobulin test in the post-surgical follow-up of very low-risk patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma.

The European Thyroid Association (ETA) and the American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines identify subgroups of patients affected by thyroid carcinoma in whom, due to a low risk of recurrence, radioiodine ablation is not indicated. These patients are referred to as "very low-risk" according to the ETA consensus and "low-risk" patients according to the ATA guidelines. The recommended post-surgical follow-up of these patients is based upon periodical measurements of serum thyroglobulin (Tg) on levothyroxine therapy and neck ultrasound (US). To evaluate the usefulness of recombinant human (rh)-TSH Tg test and its repetition 2-3 yr afterwards in very low-risk patients. We consecutively enrolled 32 patients with undetectable anti-Tg antibodies. Basal serum Tg levels was undetectable in all patients. Following rhTSH serum Tg remained undetectable in 23 (71.9%) patients (UP) and was >1.0 ng/ml in 9 (DP). US and whole body scan, revealed lymph node metastasis in 4/9 DP patients. A second rhTSH stimulation test (36.9±3.5 months later) was performed in all UP and in 5 DP patients without proven recurrences. All the UP and 4/5 formerly DP patients showed undetectable Tg stimulation. Our results suggest that rhTSH Tg test may be helpful in very low-risk patients, given its ability to differentiate those who may be considered "free of disease" from those who require further investigation and treatment. Repeated rhTSH Tg tests may be indicated only in patients with detectable serum Tg at prior stimulation testing.

This study does not have a target drug

Usefulness of repeated recombinant human thyrotropin-stimulated thyroglobulin test in the post-surgical follow-up of very low-risk patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma.

The European Thyroid Association (ETA) and the American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines identify subgroups of patients affected by thyroid carcinoma in whom, due to a low risk of recurrence, radioiodine ablation is not indicated. These patients are referred to as "very low-risk" according to the ETA consensus and "low-risk" patients according to the ATA guidelines. The recommended post-surgical follow-up of these patients is based upon periodical measurements of serum thyroglobulin (Tg) on levothyroxine therapy and neck ultrasound (US). To evaluate the usefulness of recombinant human (rh)-TSH Tg test and its repetition 2-3 yr afterwards in very low-risk patients. We consecutively enrolled 32 patients with undetectable anti-Tg antibodies. Basal serum Tg levels was undetectable in all patients. Following rhTSH serum Tg remained undetectable in 23 (71.9%) patients (UP) and was >1.0 ng/ml in 9 (DP). US and whole body scan, revealed lymph node metastasis in 4/9 DP patients. A second rhTSH stimulation test (36.9±3.5 months later) was performed in all UP and in 5 DP patients without proven recurrences. All the UP and 4/5 formerly DP patients showed undetectable Tg stimulation. Our results suggest that rhTSH Tg test may be helpful in very low-risk patients, given its ability to differentiate those who may be considered "free of disease" from those who require further investigation and treatment. Repeated rhTSH Tg tests may be indicated only in patients with detectable serum Tg at prior stimulation testing.

This study has a target disease

Usefulness of repeated recombinant human thyrotropin-stimulated thyroglobulin test in the post-surgical follow-up of very low-risk patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma.

The European Thyroid Association (ETA) and the American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines identify subgroups of patients affected by thyroid carcinoma in whom, due to a low risk of recurrence, radioiodine ablation is not indicated. These patients are referred to as "very low-risk" according to the ETA consensus and "low-risk" patients according to the ATA guidelines. The recommended post-surgical follow-up of these patients is based upon periodical measurements of serum thyroglobulin (Tg) on levothyroxine therapy and neck ultrasound (US). To evaluate the usefulness of recombinant human (rh)-TSH Tg test and its repetition 2-3 yr afterwards in very low-risk patients. We consecutively enrolled 32 patients with undetectable anti-Tg antibodies. Basal serum Tg levels was undetectable in all patients. Following rhTSH serum Tg remained undetectable in 23 (71.9%) patients (UP) and was >1.0 ng/ml in 9 (DP). US and whole body scan, revealed lymph node metastasis in 4/9 DP patients. A second rhTSH stimulation test (36.9±3.5 months later) was performed in all UP and in 5 DP patients without proven recurrences. All the UP and 4/5 formerly DP patients showed undetectable Tg stimulation. Our results suggest that rhTSH Tg test may be helpful in very low-risk patients, given its ability to differentiate those who may be considered "free of disease" from those who require further investigation and treatment. Repeated rhTSH Tg tests may be indicated only in patients with detectable serum Tg at prior stimulation testing.

This study does not have a target disease

Carvedilol versus metoprolol in the acute phase of myocardial infarction:.

Beta-adrenergic blockers provide significant cardioprotection during acute ischemia and reperfusion. To further explore the effects of additional alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade on autonomic modulation in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), carvedilol was compared with metoprolol in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). In a prospective study, 100 consecutive patients (61.1 +/- 11 years; 23 females) undergoing primary PCI for AMI were randomly assigned to metoprolol 200 mg/day vs carvedilol 25 mg/day. The first oral dose of study drug was administered upon hospital admission, and a 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram was recorded. A total of 40 recordings of patients assigned to metoprolol and 39 of patients assigned to carvedilol were eligible for analysis of heart rate turbulence. Turbulence onset (TO), turbulence slope (TS), and turbulence timing were measured after ventricular premature beats (VPBs). The mean value of the 10 preceding RR intervals (mean RR) before VPBs was also measured. There were no significant differences in mean age, gender distributions, TIMI perfusion grades, left ventricular ejection fraction, site and size of infarction, duration of ischemia, and mean 24-hour heart rate between the two groups. Though the mean RR were not significantly different (metoprolol 863.1 +/- 157 ms; carvedilol 839.6 +/- 151 ms), there was a trend toward lower values of TO in the carvedilol group (-0.015 +/- 0.016 vs -0.012 +/- 0.023%; P = NS) and significantly higher values for TS in the metoprolol group (6.96 +/- 5.8 vs 5.6 +/- 4.22; P < 0.05). Turbulence timing was similar in both groups (metoprolol 5.8 +/- 2.4 vs carvedilol 6.1 +/- 2.1). In patients undergoing direct PCI for AMI, treatment with carvedilol, in contrast to metoprolol, was associated with a higher early acceleration and a lower deceleration of heart rate after VPBs, indicating differing effects on baroreceptor response due to additional alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade. These data offer new insights into effects of a broader antiadrenergic therapy on autonomic reflexes in the acute phase of AMI.

This study has a cohort study or clinical trial

Carvedilol versus metoprolol in the acute phase of myocardial infarction:.

Beta-adrenergic blockers provide significant cardioprotection during acute ischemia and reperfusion. To further explore the effects of additional alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade on autonomic modulation in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), carvedilol was compared with metoprolol in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). In a prospective study, 100 consecutive patients (61.1 +/- 11 years; 23 females) undergoing primary PCI for AMI were randomly assigned to metoprolol 200 mg/day vs carvedilol 25 mg/day. The first oral dose of study drug was administered upon hospital admission, and a 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram was recorded. A total of 40 recordings of patients assigned to metoprolol and 39 of patients assigned to carvedilol were eligible for analysis of heart rate turbulence. Turbulence onset (TO), turbulence slope (TS), and turbulence timing were measured after ventricular premature beats (VPBs). The mean value of the 10 preceding RR intervals (mean RR) before VPBs was also measured. There were no significant differences in mean age, gender distributions, TIMI perfusion grades, left ventricular ejection fraction, site and size of infarction, duration of ischemia, and mean 24-hour heart rate between the two groups. Though the mean RR were not significantly different (metoprolol 863.1 +/- 157 ms; carvedilol 839.6 +/- 151 ms), there was a trend toward lower values of TO in the carvedilol group (-0.015 +/- 0.016 vs -0.012 +/- 0.023%; P = NS) and significantly higher values for TS in the metoprolol group (6.96 +/- 5.8 vs 5.6 +/- 4.22; P < 0.05). Turbulence timing was similar in both groups (metoprolol 5.8 +/- 2.4 vs carvedilol 6.1 +/- 2.1). In patients undergoing direct PCI for AMI, treatment with carvedilol, in contrast to metoprolol, was associated with a higher early acceleration and a lower deceleration of heart rate after VPBs, indicating differing effects on baroreceptor response due to additional alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade. These data offer new insights into effects of a broader antiadrenergic therapy on autonomic reflexes in the acute phase of AMI.

This study does not have any cohorts or clinical trial

Carvedilol versus metoprolol in the acute phase of myocardial infarction:.

Beta-adrenergic blockers provide significant cardioprotection during acute ischemia and reperfusion. To further explore the effects of additional alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade on autonomic modulation in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), carvedilol was compared with metoprolol in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). In a prospective study, 100 consecutive patients (61.1 +/- 11 years; 23 females) undergoing primary PCI for AMI were randomly assigned to metoprolol 200 mg/day vs carvedilol 25 mg/day. The first oral dose of study drug was administered upon hospital admission, and a 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram was recorded. A total of 40 recordings of patients assigned to metoprolol and 39 of patients assigned to carvedilol were eligible for analysis of heart rate turbulence. Turbulence onset (TO), turbulence slope (TS), and turbulence timing were measured after ventricular premature beats (VPBs). The mean value of the 10 preceding RR intervals (mean RR) before VPBs was also measured. There were no significant differences in mean age, gender distributions, TIMI perfusion grades, left ventricular ejection fraction, site and size of infarction, duration of ischemia, and mean 24-hour heart rate between the two groups. Though the mean RR were not significantly different (metoprolol 863.1 +/- 157 ms; carvedilol 839.6 +/- 151 ms), there was a trend toward lower values of TO in the carvedilol group (-0.015 +/- 0.016 vs -0.012 +/- 0.023%; P = NS) and significantly higher values for TS in the metoprolol group (6.96 +/- 5.8 vs 5.6 +/- 4.22; P < 0.05). Turbulence timing was similar in both groups (metoprolol 5.8 +/- 2.4 vs carvedilol 6.1 +/- 2.1). In patients undergoing direct PCI for AMI, treatment with carvedilol, in contrast to metoprolol, was associated with a higher early acceleration and a lower deceleration of heart rate after VPBs, indicating differing effects on baroreceptor response due to additional alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade. These data offer new insights into effects of a broader antiadrenergic therapy on autonomic reflexes in the acute phase of AMI.

This study has a control, double-blind, or comparison patient group

Carvedilol versus metoprolol in the acute phase of myocardial infarction:.

Beta-adrenergic blockers provide significant cardioprotection during acute ischemia and reperfusion. To further explore the effects of additional alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade on autonomic modulation in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), carvedilol was compared with metoprolol in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). In a prospective study, 100 consecutive patients (61.1 +/- 11 years; 23 females) undergoing primary PCI for AMI were randomly assigned to metoprolol 200 mg/day vs carvedilol 25 mg/day. The first oral dose of study drug was administered upon hospital admission, and a 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram was recorded. A total of 40 recordings of patients assigned to metoprolol and 39 of patients assigned to carvedilol were eligible for analysis of heart rate turbulence. Turbulence onset (TO), turbulence slope (TS), and turbulence timing were measured after ventricular premature beats (VPBs). The mean value of the 10 preceding RR intervals (mean RR) before VPBs was also measured. There were no significant differences in mean age, gender distributions, TIMI perfusion grades, left ventricular ejection fraction, site and size of infarction, duration of ischemia, and mean 24-hour heart rate between the two groups. Though the mean RR were not significantly different (metoprolol 863.1 +/- 157 ms; carvedilol 839.6 +/- 151 ms), there was a trend toward lower values of TO in the carvedilol group (-0.015 +/- 0.016 vs -0.012 +/- 0.023%; P = NS) and significantly higher values for TS in the metoprolol group (6.96 +/- 5.8 vs 5.6 +/- 4.22; P < 0.05). Turbulence timing was similar in both groups (metoprolol 5.8 +/- 2.4 vs carvedilol 6.1 +/- 2.1). In patients undergoing direct PCI for AMI, treatment with carvedilol, in contrast to metoprolol, was associated with a higher early acceleration and a lower deceleration of heart rate after VPBs, indicating differing effects on baroreceptor response due to additional alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade. These data offer new insights into effects of a broader antiadrenergic therapy on autonomic reflexes in the acute phase of AMI.

This study does not have any comparison patient group

Carvedilol versus metoprolol in the acute phase of myocardial infarction:.

Beta-adrenergic blockers provide significant cardioprotection during acute ischemia and reperfusion. To further explore the effects of additional alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade on autonomic modulation in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), carvedilol was compared with metoprolol in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). In a prospective study, 100 consecutive patients (61.1 +/- 11 years; 23 females) undergoing primary PCI for AMI were randomly assigned to metoprolol 200 mg/day vs carvedilol 25 mg/day. The first oral dose of study drug was administered upon hospital admission, and a 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram was recorded. A total of 40 recordings of patients assigned to metoprolol and 39 of patients assigned to carvedilol were eligible for analysis of heart rate turbulence. Turbulence onset (TO), turbulence slope (TS), and turbulence timing were measured after ventricular premature beats (VPBs). The mean value of the 10 preceding RR intervals (mean RR) before VPBs was also measured. There were no significant differences in mean age, gender distributions, TIMI perfusion grades, left ventricular ejection fraction, site and size of infarction, duration of ischemia, and mean 24-hour heart rate between the two groups. Though the mean RR were not significantly different (metoprolol 863.1 +/- 157 ms; carvedilol 839.6 +/- 151 ms), there was a trend toward lower values of TO in the carvedilol group (-0.015 +/- 0.016 vs -0.012 +/- 0.023%; P = NS) and significantly higher values for TS in the metoprolol group (6.96 +/- 5.8 vs 5.6 +/- 4.22; P < 0.05). Turbulence timing was similar in both groups (metoprolol 5.8 +/- 2.4 vs carvedilol 6.1 +/- 2.1). In patients undergoing direct PCI for AMI, treatment with carvedilol, in contrast to metoprolol, was associated with a higher early acceleration and a lower deceleration of heart rate after VPBs, indicating differing effects on baroreceptor response due to additional alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade. These data offer new insights into effects of a broader antiadrenergic therapy on autonomic reflexes in the acute phase of AMI.

This study has human subjects

Carvedilol versus metoprolol in the acute phase of myocardial infarction:.

Beta-adrenergic blockers provide significant cardioprotection during acute ischemia and reperfusion. To further explore the effects of additional alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade on autonomic modulation in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), carvedilol was compared with metoprolol in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). In a prospective study, 100 consecutive patients (61.1 +/- 11 years; 23 females) undergoing primary PCI for AMI were randomly assigned to metoprolol 200 mg/day vs carvedilol 25 mg/day. The first oral dose of study drug was administered upon hospital admission, and a 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram was recorded. A total of 40 recordings of patients assigned to metoprolol and 39 of patients assigned to carvedilol were eligible for analysis of heart rate turbulence. Turbulence onset (TO), turbulence slope (TS), and turbulence timing were measured after ventricular premature beats (VPBs). The mean value of the 10 preceding RR intervals (mean RR) before VPBs was also measured. There were no significant differences in mean age, gender distributions, TIMI perfusion grades, left ventricular ejection fraction, site and size of infarction, duration of ischemia, and mean 24-hour heart rate between the two groups. Though the mean RR were not significantly different (metoprolol 863.1 +/- 157 ms; carvedilol 839.6 +/- 151 ms), there was a trend toward lower values of TO in the carvedilol group (-0.015 +/- 0.016 vs -0.012 +/- 0.023%; P = NS) and significantly higher values for TS in the metoprolol group (6.96 +/- 5.8 vs 5.6 +/- 4.22; P < 0.05). Turbulence timing was similar in both groups (metoprolol 5.8 +/- 2.4 vs carvedilol 6.1 +/- 2.1). In patients undergoing direct PCI for AMI, treatment with carvedilol, in contrast to metoprolol, was associated with a higher early acceleration and a lower deceleration of heart rate after VPBs, indicating differing effects on baroreceptor response due to additional alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade. These data offer new insights into effects of a broader antiadrenergic therapy on autonomic reflexes in the acute phase of AMI.

This study does not have human subjects

Carvedilol versus metoprolol in the acute phase of myocardial infarction:.

Beta-adrenergic blockers provide significant cardioprotection during acute ischemia and reperfusion. To further explore the effects of additional alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade on autonomic modulation in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), carvedilol was compared with metoprolol in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). In a prospective study, 100 consecutive patients (61.1 +/- 11 years; 23 females) undergoing primary PCI for AMI were randomly assigned to metoprolol 200 mg/day vs carvedilol 25 mg/day. The first oral dose of study drug was administered upon hospital admission, and a 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram was recorded. A total of 40 recordings of patients assigned to metoprolol and 39 of patients assigned to carvedilol were eligible for analysis of heart rate turbulence. Turbulence onset (TO), turbulence slope (TS), and turbulence timing were measured after ventricular premature beats (VPBs). The mean value of the 10 preceding RR intervals (mean RR) before VPBs was also measured. There were no significant differences in mean age, gender distributions, TIMI perfusion grades, left ventricular ejection fraction, site and size of infarction, duration of ischemia, and mean 24-hour heart rate between the two groups. Though the mean RR were not significantly different (metoprolol 863.1 +/- 157 ms; carvedilol 839.6 +/- 151 ms), there was a trend toward lower values of TO in the carvedilol group (-0.015 +/- 0.016 vs -0.012 +/- 0.023%; P = NS) and significantly higher values for TS in the metoprolol group (6.96 +/- 5.8 vs 5.6 +/- 4.22; P < 0.05). Turbulence timing was similar in both groups (metoprolol 5.8 +/- 2.4 vs carvedilol 6.1 +/- 2.1). In patients undergoing direct PCI for AMI, treatment with carvedilol, in contrast to metoprolol, was associated with a higher early acceleration and a lower deceleration of heart rate after VPBs, indicating differing effects on baroreceptor response due to additional alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade. These data offer new insights into effects of a broader antiadrenergic therapy on autonomic reflexes in the acute phase of AMI.

This study contains population size or sample size information

Carvedilol versus metoprolol in the acute phase of myocardial infarction:.

Beta-adrenergic blockers provide significant cardioprotection during acute ischemia and reperfusion. To further explore the effects of additional alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade on autonomic modulation in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), carvedilol was compared with metoprolol in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). In a prospective study, 100 consecutive patients (61.1 +/- 11 years; 23 females) undergoing primary PCI for AMI were randomly assigned to metoprolol 200 mg/day vs carvedilol 25 mg/day. The first oral dose of study drug was administered upon hospital admission, and a 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram was recorded. A total of 40 recordings of patients assigned to metoprolol and 39 of patients assigned to carvedilol were eligible for analysis of heart rate turbulence. Turbulence onset (TO), turbulence slope (TS), and turbulence timing were measured after ventricular premature beats (VPBs). The mean value of the 10 preceding RR intervals (mean RR) before VPBs was also measured. There were no significant differences in mean age, gender distributions, TIMI perfusion grades, left ventricular ejection fraction, site and size of infarction, duration of ischemia, and mean 24-hour heart rate between the two groups. Though the mean RR were not significantly different (metoprolol 863.1 +/- 157 ms; carvedilol 839.6 +/- 151 ms), there was a trend toward lower values of TO in the carvedilol group (-0.015 +/- 0.016 vs -0.012 +/- 0.023%; P = NS) and significantly higher values for TS in the metoprolol group (6.96 +/- 5.8 vs 5.6 +/- 4.22; P < 0.05). Turbulence timing was similar in both groups (metoprolol 5.8 +/- 2.4 vs carvedilol 6.1 +/- 2.1). In patients undergoing direct PCI for AMI, treatment with carvedilol, in contrast to metoprolol, was associated with a higher early acceleration and a lower deceleration of heart rate after VPBs, indicating differing effects on baroreceptor response due to additional alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade. These data offer new insights into effects of a broader antiadrenergic therapy on autonomic reflexes in the acute phase of AMI.

This study does not contain population size information

Carvedilol versus metoprolol in the acute phase of myocardial infarction:.

Beta-adrenergic blockers provide significant cardioprotection during acute ischemia and reperfusion. To further explore the effects of additional alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade on autonomic modulation in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), carvedilol was compared with metoprolol in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). In a prospective study, 100 consecutive patients (61.1 +/- 11 years; 23 females) undergoing primary PCI for AMI were randomly assigned to metoprolol 200 mg/day vs carvedilol 25 mg/day. The first oral dose of study drug was administered upon hospital admission, and a 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram was recorded. A total of 40 recordings of patients assigned to metoprolol and 39 of patients assigned to carvedilol were eligible for analysis of heart rate turbulence. Turbulence onset (TO), turbulence slope (TS), and turbulence timing were measured after ventricular premature beats (VPBs). The mean value of the 10 preceding RR intervals (mean RR) before VPBs was also measured. There were no significant differences in mean age, gender distributions, TIMI perfusion grades, left ventricular ejection fraction, site and size of infarction, duration of ischemia, and mean 24-hour heart rate between the two groups. Though the mean RR were not significantly different (metoprolol 863.1 +/- 157 ms; carvedilol 839.6 +/- 151 ms), there was a trend toward lower values of TO in the carvedilol group (-0.015 +/- 0.016 vs -0.012 +/- 0.023%; P = NS) and significantly higher values for TS in the metoprolol group (6.96 +/- 5.8 vs 5.6 +/- 4.22; P < 0.05). Turbulence timing was similar in both groups (metoprolol 5.8 +/- 2.4 vs carvedilol 6.1 +/- 2.1). In patients undergoing direct PCI for AMI, treatment with carvedilol, in contrast to metoprolol, was associated with a higher early acceleration and a lower deceleration of heart rate after VPBs, indicating differing effects on baroreceptor response due to additional alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade. These data offer new insights into effects of a broader antiadrenergic therapy on autonomic reflexes in the acute phase of AMI.

This study has quantitative outcomes like numbers, P-value, OR, CI, HR, RR, or patient ratios

Carvedilol versus metoprolol in the acute phase of myocardial infarction:.

Beta-adrenergic blockers provide significant cardioprotection during acute ischemia and reperfusion. To further explore the effects of additional alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade on autonomic modulation in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), carvedilol was compared with metoprolol in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). In a prospective study, 100 consecutive patients (61.1 +/- 11 years; 23 females) undergoing primary PCI for AMI were randomly assigned to metoprolol 200 mg/day vs carvedilol 25 mg/day. The first oral dose of study drug was administered upon hospital admission, and a 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram was recorded. A total of 40 recordings of patients assigned to metoprolol and 39 of patients assigned to carvedilol were eligible for analysis of heart rate turbulence. Turbulence onset (TO), turbulence slope (TS), and turbulence timing were measured after ventricular premature beats (VPBs). The mean value of the 10 preceding RR intervals (mean RR) before VPBs was also measured. There were no significant differences in mean age, gender distributions, TIMI perfusion grades, left ventricular ejection fraction, site and size of infarction, duration of ischemia, and mean 24-hour heart rate between the two groups. Though the mean RR were not significantly different (metoprolol 863.1 +/- 157 ms; carvedilol 839.6 +/- 151 ms), there was a trend toward lower values of TO in the carvedilol group (-0.015 +/- 0.016 vs -0.012 +/- 0.023%; P = NS) and significantly higher values for TS in the metoprolol group (6.96 +/- 5.8 vs 5.6 +/- 4.22; P < 0.05). Turbulence timing was similar in both groups (metoprolol 5.8 +/- 2.4 vs carvedilol 6.1 +/- 2.1). In patients undergoing direct PCI for AMI, treatment with carvedilol, in contrast to metoprolol, was associated with a higher early acceleration and a lower deceleration of heart rate after VPBs, indicating differing effects on baroreceptor response due to additional alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade. These data offer new insights into effects of a broader antiadrenergic therapy on autonomic reflexes in the acute phase of AMI.

This study does not have any quantitative outcomes

Carvedilol versus metoprolol in the acute phase of myocardial infarction:.

Beta-adrenergic blockers provide significant cardioprotection during acute ischemia and reperfusion. To further explore the effects of additional alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade on autonomic modulation in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), carvedilol was compared with metoprolol in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). In a prospective study, 100 consecutive patients (61.1 +/- 11 years; 23 females) undergoing primary PCI for AMI were randomly assigned to metoprolol 200 mg/day vs carvedilol 25 mg/day. The first oral dose of study drug was administered upon hospital admission, and a 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram was recorded. A total of 40 recordings of patients assigned to metoprolol and 39 of patients assigned to carvedilol were eligible for analysis of heart rate turbulence. Turbulence onset (TO), turbulence slope (TS), and turbulence timing were measured after ventricular premature beats (VPBs). The mean value of the 10 preceding RR intervals (mean RR) before VPBs was also measured. There were no significant differences in mean age, gender distributions, TIMI perfusion grades, left ventricular ejection fraction, site and size of infarction, duration of ischemia, and mean 24-hour heart rate between the two groups. Though the mean RR were not significantly different (metoprolol 863.1 +/- 157 ms; carvedilol 839.6 +/- 151 ms), there was a trend toward lower values of TO in the carvedilol group (-0.015 +/- 0.016 vs -0.012 +/- 0.023%; P = NS) and significantly higher values for TS in the metoprolol group (6.96 +/- 5.8 vs 5.6 +/- 4.22; P < 0.05). Turbulence timing was similar in both groups (metoprolol 5.8 +/- 2.4 vs carvedilol 6.1 +/- 2.1). In patients undergoing direct PCI for AMI, treatment with carvedilol, in contrast to metoprolol, was associated with a higher early acceleration and a lower deceleration of heart rate after VPBs, indicating differing effects on baroreceptor response due to additional alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade. These data offer new insights into effects of a broader antiadrenergic therapy on autonomic reflexes in the acute phase of AMI.

This study has a target drug

Carvedilol versus metoprolol in the acute phase of myocardial infarction:.

Beta-adrenergic blockers provide significant cardioprotection during acute ischemia and reperfusion. To further explore the effects of additional alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade on autonomic modulation in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), carvedilol was compared with metoprolol in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). In a prospective study, 100 consecutive patients (61.1 +/- 11 years; 23 females) undergoing primary PCI for AMI were randomly assigned to metoprolol 200 mg/day vs carvedilol 25 mg/day. The first oral dose of study drug was administered upon hospital admission, and a 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram was recorded. A total of 40 recordings of patients assigned to metoprolol and 39 of patients assigned to carvedilol were eligible for analysis of heart rate turbulence. Turbulence onset (TO), turbulence slope (TS), and turbulence timing were measured after ventricular premature beats (VPBs). The mean value of the 10 preceding RR intervals (mean RR) before VPBs was also measured. There were no significant differences in mean age, gender distributions, TIMI perfusion grades, left ventricular ejection fraction, site and size of infarction, duration of ischemia, and mean 24-hour heart rate between the two groups. Though the mean RR were not significantly different (metoprolol 863.1 +/- 157 ms; carvedilol 839.6 +/- 151 ms), there was a trend toward lower values of TO in the carvedilol group (-0.015 +/- 0.016 vs -0.012 +/- 0.023%; P = NS) and significantly higher values for TS in the metoprolol group (6.96 +/- 5.8 vs 5.6 +/- 4.22; P < 0.05). Turbulence timing was similar in both groups (metoprolol 5.8 +/- 2.4 vs carvedilol 6.1 +/- 2.1). In patients undergoing direct PCI for AMI, treatment with carvedilol, in contrast to metoprolol, was associated with a higher early acceleration and a lower deceleration of heart rate after VPBs, indicating differing effects on baroreceptor response due to additional alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade. These data offer new insights into effects of a broader antiadrenergic therapy on autonomic reflexes in the acute phase of AMI.

This study does not have a target drug

Carvedilol versus metoprolol in the acute phase of myocardial infarction:.

Beta-adrenergic blockers provide significant cardioprotection during acute ischemia and reperfusion. To further explore the effects of additional alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade on autonomic modulation in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), carvedilol was compared with metoprolol in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). In a prospective study, 100 consecutive patients (61.1 +/- 11 years; 23 females) undergoing primary PCI for AMI were randomly assigned to metoprolol 200 mg/day vs carvedilol 25 mg/day. The first oral dose of study drug was administered upon hospital admission, and a 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram was recorded. A total of 40 recordings of patients assigned to metoprolol and 39 of patients assigned to carvedilol were eligible for analysis of heart rate turbulence. Turbulence onset (TO), turbulence slope (TS), and turbulence timing were measured after ventricular premature beats (VPBs). The mean value of the 10 preceding RR intervals (mean RR) before VPBs was also measured. There were no significant differences in mean age, gender distributions, TIMI perfusion grades, left ventricular ejection fraction, site and size of infarction, duration of ischemia, and mean 24-hour heart rate between the two groups. Though the mean RR were not significantly different (metoprolol 863.1 +/- 157 ms; carvedilol 839.6 +/- 151 ms), there was a trend toward lower values of TO in the carvedilol group (-0.015 +/- 0.016 vs -0.012 +/- 0.023%; P = NS) and significantly higher values for TS in the metoprolol group (6.96 +/- 5.8 vs 5.6 +/- 4.22; P < 0.05). Turbulence timing was similar in both groups (metoprolol 5.8 +/- 2.4 vs carvedilol 6.1 +/- 2.1). In patients undergoing direct PCI for AMI, treatment with carvedilol, in contrast to metoprolol, was associated with a higher early acceleration and a lower deceleration of heart rate after VPBs, indicating differing effects on baroreceptor response due to additional alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade. These data offer new insights into effects of a broader antiadrenergic therapy on autonomic reflexes in the acute phase of AMI.

This study has a target disease

Carvedilol versus metoprolol in the acute phase of myocardial infarction:.

Beta-adrenergic blockers provide significant cardioprotection during acute ischemia and reperfusion. To further explore the effects of additional alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade on autonomic modulation in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), carvedilol was compared with metoprolol in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). In a prospective study, 100 consecutive patients (61.1 +/- 11 years; 23 females) undergoing primary PCI for AMI were randomly assigned to metoprolol 200 mg/day vs carvedilol 25 mg/day. The first oral dose of study drug was administered upon hospital admission, and a 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram was recorded. A total of 40 recordings of patients assigned to metoprolol and 39 of patients assigned to carvedilol were eligible for analysis of heart rate turbulence. Turbulence onset (TO), turbulence slope (TS), and turbulence timing were measured after ventricular premature beats (VPBs). The mean value of the 10 preceding RR intervals (mean RR) before VPBs was also measured. There were no significant differences in mean age, gender distributions, TIMI perfusion grades, left ventricular ejection fraction, site and size of infarction, duration of ischemia, and mean 24-hour heart rate between the two groups. Though the mean RR were not significantly different (metoprolol 863.1 +/- 157 ms; carvedilol 839.6 +/- 151 ms), there was a trend toward lower values of TO in the carvedilol group (-0.015 +/- 0.016 vs -0.012 +/- 0.023%; P = NS) and significantly higher values for TS in the metoprolol group (6.96 +/- 5.8 vs 5.6 +/- 4.22; P < 0.05). Turbulence timing was similar in both groups (metoprolol 5.8 +/- 2.4 vs carvedilol 6.1 +/- 2.1). In patients undergoing direct PCI for AMI, treatment with carvedilol, in contrast to metoprolol, was associated with a higher early acceleration and a lower deceleration of heart rate after VPBs, indicating differing effects on baroreceptor response due to additional alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade. These data offer new insights into effects of a broader antiadrenergic therapy on autonomic reflexes in the acute phase of AMI.

This study does not have a target disease

ACE inhibitors in hypertension: assessment of taste and smell function in clinical trials.

Taste and smell disturbances are infrequently reported adverse effects of treatment with captopril and are even less frequently reported with other ACE inhibitors. These adverse effects have been attributed to the chemical structure of the drugs used, although this relationship is the matter of some debate. A link between the taste disturbance associated with ACE inhibitors and changes in plasma zinc concentration has also been suggested, but again the evidence for this relationship is equivocal. One problem facing research in this area has been the lack of reliable assessment techniques for the quantitative evaluation of smell and taste function. Three quantitative methods for evaluating taste and smell function are described, together with the results of a pilot study aimed at evaluating the potential ease of application of these techniques in a larger group of patients. In this double-blind, crossover pilot study, 8-week treatment with lisinopril (20-40 mg once daily) was compared with captopril (25-50 mg twice daily) in 12 hypertensive patients. The two drugs produced similar falls in lying and standing blood pressure and neither drug produced a significant alteration in smell recognition, or olfactory or taste threshold. None of the minor changes observed appeared to correlate with either plasma zinc concentrations or intra-erythrocyte zinc levels. This study provides important observations on the use of these new techniques. Based on the wide variability of results obtained, the design of further clinical studies must address and overcome the many factors (age, sex, smoking, etc.) which may confound the study of drug effects on taste and smell.

This study has a cohort study or clinical trial

ACE inhibitors in hypertension: assessment of taste and smell function in clinical trials.

Taste and smell disturbances are infrequently reported adverse effects of treatment with captopril and are even less frequently reported with other ACE inhibitors. These adverse effects have been attributed to the chemical structure of the drugs used, although this relationship is the matter of some debate. A link between the taste disturbance associated with ACE inhibitors and changes in plasma zinc concentration has also been suggested, but again the evidence for this relationship is equivocal. One problem facing research in this area has been the lack of reliable assessment techniques for the quantitative evaluation of smell and taste function. Three quantitative methods for evaluating taste and smell function are described, together with the results of a pilot study aimed at evaluating the potential ease of application of these techniques in a larger group of patients. In this double-blind, crossover pilot study, 8-week treatment with lisinopril (20-40 mg once daily) was compared with captopril (25-50 mg twice daily) in 12 hypertensive patients. The two drugs produced similar falls in lying and standing blood pressure and neither drug produced a significant alteration in smell recognition, or olfactory or taste threshold. None of the minor changes observed appeared to correlate with either plasma zinc concentrations or intra-erythrocyte zinc levels. This study provides important observations on the use of these new techniques. Based on the wide variability of results obtained, the design of further clinical studies must address and overcome the many factors (age, sex, smoking, etc.) which may confound the study of drug effects on taste and smell.

This study does not have any cohorts or clinical trial

ACE inhibitors in hypertension: assessment of taste and smell function in clinical trials.

Taste and smell disturbances are infrequently reported adverse effects of treatment with captopril and are even less frequently reported with other ACE inhibitors. These adverse effects have been attributed to the chemical structure of the drugs used, although this relationship is the matter of some debate. A link between the taste disturbance associated with ACE inhibitors and changes in plasma zinc concentration has also been suggested, but again the evidence for this relationship is equivocal. One problem facing research in this area has been the lack of reliable assessment techniques for the quantitative evaluation of smell and taste function. Three quantitative methods for evaluating taste and smell function are described, together with the results of a pilot study aimed at evaluating the potential ease of application of these techniques in a larger group of patients. In this double-blind, crossover pilot study, 8-week treatment with lisinopril (20-40 mg once daily) was compared with captopril (25-50 mg twice daily) in 12 hypertensive patients. The two drugs produced similar falls in lying and standing blood pressure and neither drug produced a significant alteration in smell recognition, or olfactory or taste threshold. None of the minor changes observed appeared to correlate with either plasma zinc concentrations or intra-erythrocyte zinc levels. This study provides important observations on the use of these new techniques. Based on the wide variability of results obtained, the design of further clinical studies must address and overcome the many factors (age, sex, smoking, etc.) which may confound the study of drug effects on taste and smell.

This study has a control, double-blind, or comparison patient group

ACE inhibitors in hypertension: assessment of taste and smell function in clinical trials.

Taste and smell disturbances are infrequently reported adverse effects of treatment with captopril and are even less frequently reported with other ACE inhibitors. These adverse effects have been attributed to the chemical structure of the drugs used, although this relationship is the matter of some debate. A link between the taste disturbance associated with ACE inhibitors and changes in plasma zinc concentration has also been suggested, but again the evidence for this relationship is equivocal. One problem facing research in this area has been the lack of reliable assessment techniques for the quantitative evaluation of smell and taste function. Three quantitative methods for evaluating taste and smell function are described, together with the results of a pilot study aimed at evaluating the potential ease of application of these techniques in a larger group of patients. In this double-blind, crossover pilot study, 8-week treatment with lisinopril (20-40 mg once daily) was compared with captopril (25-50 mg twice daily) in 12 hypertensive patients. The two drugs produced similar falls in lying and standing blood pressure and neither drug produced a significant alteration in smell recognition, or olfactory or taste threshold. None of the minor changes observed appeared to correlate with either plasma zinc concentrations or intra-erythrocyte zinc levels. This study provides important observations on the use of these new techniques. Based on the wide variability of results obtained, the design of further clinical studies must address and overcome the many factors (age, sex, smoking, etc.) which may confound the study of drug effects on taste and smell.

This study does not have any comparison patient group

ACE inhibitors in hypertension: assessment of taste and smell function in clinical trials.

Taste and smell disturbances are infrequently reported adverse effects of treatment with captopril and are even less frequently reported with other ACE inhibitors. These adverse effects have been attributed to the chemical structure of the drugs used, although this relationship is the matter of some debate. A link between the taste disturbance associated with ACE inhibitors and changes in plasma zinc concentration has also been suggested, but again the evidence for this relationship is equivocal. One problem facing research in this area has been the lack of reliable assessment techniques for the quantitative evaluation of smell and taste function. Three quantitative methods for evaluating taste and smell function are described, together with the results of a pilot study aimed at evaluating the potential ease of application of these techniques in a larger group of patients. In this double-blind, crossover pilot study, 8-week treatment with lisinopril (20-40 mg once daily) was compared with captopril (25-50 mg twice daily) in 12 hypertensive patients. The two drugs produced similar falls in lying and standing blood pressure and neither drug produced a significant alteration in smell recognition, or olfactory or taste threshold. None of the minor changes observed appeared to correlate with either plasma zinc concentrations or intra-erythrocyte zinc levels. This study provides important observations on the use of these new techniques. Based on the wide variability of results obtained, the design of further clinical studies must address and overcome the many factors (age, sex, smoking, etc.) which may confound the study of drug effects on taste and smell.

This study has human subjects

ACE inhibitors in hypertension: assessment of taste and smell function in clinical trials.

Taste and smell disturbances are infrequently reported adverse effects of treatment with captopril and are even less frequently reported with other ACE inhibitors. These adverse effects have been attributed to the chemical structure of the drugs used, although this relationship is the matter of some debate. A link between the taste disturbance associated with ACE inhibitors and changes in plasma zinc concentration has also been suggested, but again the evidence for this relationship is equivocal. One problem facing research in this area has been the lack of reliable assessment techniques for the quantitative evaluation of smell and taste function. Three quantitative methods for evaluating taste and smell function are described, together with the results of a pilot study aimed at evaluating the potential ease of application of these techniques in a larger group of patients. In this double-blind, crossover pilot study, 8-week treatment with lisinopril (20-40 mg once daily) was compared with captopril (25-50 mg twice daily) in 12 hypertensive patients. The two drugs produced similar falls in lying and standing blood pressure and neither drug produced a significant alteration in smell recognition, or olfactory or taste threshold. None of the minor changes observed appeared to correlate with either plasma zinc concentrations or intra-erythrocyte zinc levels. This study provides important observations on the use of these new techniques. Based on the wide variability of results obtained, the design of further clinical studies must address and overcome the many factors (age, sex, smoking, etc.) which may confound the study of drug effects on taste and smell.

This study does not have human subjects

ACE inhibitors in hypertension: assessment of taste and smell function in clinical trials.

Taste and smell disturbances are infrequently reported adverse effects of treatment with captopril and are even less frequently reported with other ACE inhibitors. These adverse effects have been attributed to the chemical structure of the drugs used, although this relationship is the matter of some debate. A link between the taste disturbance associated with ACE inhibitors and changes in plasma zinc concentration has also been suggested, but again the evidence for this relationship is equivocal. One problem facing research in this area has been the lack of reliable assessment techniques for the quantitative evaluation of smell and taste function. Three quantitative methods for evaluating taste and smell function are described, together with the results of a pilot study aimed at evaluating the potential ease of application of these techniques in a larger group of patients. In this double-blind, crossover pilot study, 8-week treatment with lisinopril (20-40 mg once daily) was compared with captopril (25-50 mg twice daily) in 12 hypertensive patients. The two drugs produced similar falls in lying and standing blood pressure and neither drug produced a significant alteration in smell recognition, or olfactory or taste threshold. None of the minor changes observed appeared to correlate with either plasma zinc concentrations or intra-erythrocyte zinc levels. This study provides important observations on the use of these new techniques. Based on the wide variability of results obtained, the design of further clinical studies must address and overcome the many factors (age, sex, smoking, etc.) which may confound the study of drug effects on taste and smell.

This study contains population size or sample size information

ACE inhibitors in hypertension: assessment of taste and smell function in clinical trials.

Taste and smell disturbances are infrequently reported adverse effects of treatment with captopril and are even less frequently reported with other ACE inhibitors. These adverse effects have been attributed to the chemical structure of the drugs used, although this relationship is the matter of some debate. A link between the taste disturbance associated with ACE inhibitors and changes in plasma zinc concentration has also been suggested, but again the evidence for this relationship is equivocal. One problem facing research in this area has been the lack of reliable assessment techniques for the quantitative evaluation of smell and taste function. Three quantitative methods for evaluating taste and smell function are described, together with the results of a pilot study aimed at evaluating the potential ease of application of these techniques in a larger group of patients. In this double-blind, crossover pilot study, 8-week treatment with lisinopril (20-40 mg once daily) was compared with captopril (25-50 mg twice daily) in 12 hypertensive patients. The two drugs produced similar falls in lying and standing blood pressure and neither drug produced a significant alteration in smell recognition, or olfactory or taste threshold. None of the minor changes observed appeared to correlate with either plasma zinc concentrations or intra-erythrocyte zinc levels. This study provides important observations on the use of these new techniques. Based on the wide variability of results obtained, the design of further clinical studies must address and overcome the many factors (age, sex, smoking, etc.) which may confound the study of drug effects on taste and smell.

This study does not contain population size information

ACE inhibitors in hypertension: assessment of taste and smell function in clinical trials.

Taste and smell disturbances are infrequently reported adverse effects of treatment with captopril and are even less frequently reported with other ACE inhibitors. These adverse effects have been attributed to the chemical structure of the drugs used, although this relationship is the matter of some debate. A link between the taste disturbance associated with ACE inhibitors and changes in plasma zinc concentration has also been suggested, but again the evidence for this relationship is equivocal. One problem facing research in this area has been the lack of reliable assessment techniques for the quantitative evaluation of smell and taste function. Three quantitative methods for evaluating taste and smell function are described, together with the results of a pilot study aimed at evaluating the potential ease of application of these techniques in a larger group of patients. In this double-blind, crossover pilot study, 8-week treatment with lisinopril (20-40 mg once daily) was compared with captopril (25-50 mg twice daily) in 12 hypertensive patients. The two drugs produced similar falls in lying and standing blood pressure and neither drug produced a significant alteration in smell recognition, or olfactory or taste threshold. None of the minor changes observed appeared to correlate with either plasma zinc concentrations or intra-erythrocyte zinc levels. This study provides important observations on the use of these new techniques. Based on the wide variability of results obtained, the design of further clinical studies must address and overcome the many factors (age, sex, smoking, etc.) which may confound the study of drug effects on taste and smell.

This study has quantitative outcomes like numbers, P-value, OR, CI, HR, RR, or patient ratios

ACE inhibitors in hypertension: assessment of taste and smell function in clinical trials.

Taste and smell disturbances are infrequently reported adverse effects of treatment with captopril and are even less frequently reported with other ACE inhibitors. These adverse effects have been attributed to the chemical structure of the drugs used, although this relationship is the matter of some debate. A link between the taste disturbance associated with ACE inhibitors and changes in plasma zinc concentration has also been suggested, but again the evidence for this relationship is equivocal. One problem facing research in this area has been the lack of reliable assessment techniques for the quantitative evaluation of smell and taste function. Three quantitative methods for evaluating taste and smell function are described, together with the results of a pilot study aimed at evaluating the potential ease of application of these techniques in a larger group of patients. In this double-blind, crossover pilot study, 8-week treatment with lisinopril (20-40 mg once daily) was compared with captopril (25-50 mg twice daily) in 12 hypertensive patients. The two drugs produced similar falls in lying and standing blood pressure and neither drug produced a significant alteration in smell recognition, or olfactory or taste threshold. None of the minor changes observed appeared to correlate with either plasma zinc concentrations or intra-erythrocyte zinc levels. This study provides important observations on the use of these new techniques. Based on the wide variability of results obtained, the design of further clinical studies must address and overcome the many factors (age, sex, smoking, etc.) which may confound the study of drug effects on taste and smell.

This study does not have any quantitative outcomes

ACE inhibitors in hypertension: assessment of taste and smell function in clinical trials.

Taste and smell disturbances are infrequently reported adverse effects of treatment with captopril and are even less frequently reported with other ACE inhibitors. These adverse effects have been attributed to the chemical structure of the drugs used, although this relationship is the matter of some debate. A link between the taste disturbance associated with ACE inhibitors and changes in plasma zinc concentration has also been suggested, but again the evidence for this relationship is equivocal. One problem facing research in this area has been the lack of reliable assessment techniques for the quantitative evaluation of smell and taste function. Three quantitative methods for evaluating taste and smell function are described, together with the results of a pilot study aimed at evaluating the potential ease of application of these techniques in a larger group of patients. In this double-blind, crossover pilot study, 8-week treatment with lisinopril (20-40 mg once daily) was compared with captopril (25-50 mg twice daily) in 12 hypertensive patients. The two drugs produced similar falls in lying and standing blood pressure and neither drug produced a significant alteration in smell recognition, or olfactory or taste threshold. None of the minor changes observed appeared to correlate with either plasma zinc concentrations or intra-erythrocyte zinc levels. This study provides important observations on the use of these new techniques. Based on the wide variability of results obtained, the design of further clinical studies must address and overcome the many factors (age, sex, smoking, etc.) which may confound the study of drug effects on taste and smell.

This study has a target drug

ACE inhibitors in hypertension: assessment of taste and smell function in clinical trials.

Taste and smell disturbances are infrequently reported adverse effects of treatment with captopril and are even less frequently reported with other ACE inhibitors. These adverse effects have been attributed to the chemical structure of the drugs used, although this relationship is the matter of some debate. A link between the taste disturbance associated with ACE inhibitors and changes in plasma zinc concentration has also been suggested, but again the evidence for this relationship is equivocal. One problem facing research in this area has been the lack of reliable assessment techniques for the quantitative evaluation of smell and taste function. Three quantitative methods for evaluating taste and smell function are described, together with the results of a pilot study aimed at evaluating the potential ease of application of these techniques in a larger group of patients. In this double-blind, crossover pilot study, 8-week treatment with lisinopril (20-40 mg once daily) was compared with captopril (25-50 mg twice daily) in 12 hypertensive patients. The two drugs produced similar falls in lying and standing blood pressure and neither drug produced a significant alteration in smell recognition, or olfactory or taste threshold. None of the minor changes observed appeared to correlate with either plasma zinc concentrations or intra-erythrocyte zinc levels. This study provides important observations on the use of these new techniques. Based on the wide variability of results obtained, the design of further clinical studies must address and overcome the many factors (age, sex, smoking, etc.) which may confound the study of drug effects on taste and smell.

This study does not have a target drug

ACE inhibitors in hypertension: assessment of taste and smell function in clinical trials.

Taste and smell disturbances are infrequently reported adverse effects of treatment with captopril and are even less frequently reported with other ACE inhibitors. These adverse effects have been attributed to the chemical structure of the drugs used, although this relationship is the matter of some debate. A link between the taste disturbance associated with ACE inhibitors and changes in plasma zinc concentration has also been suggested, but again the evidence for this relationship is equivocal. One problem facing research in this area has been the lack of reliable assessment techniques for the quantitative evaluation of smell and taste function. Three quantitative methods for evaluating taste and smell function are described, together with the results of a pilot study aimed at evaluating the potential ease of application of these techniques in a larger group of patients. In this double-blind, crossover pilot study, 8-week treatment with lisinopril (20-40 mg once daily) was compared with captopril (25-50 mg twice daily) in 12 hypertensive patients. The two drugs produced similar falls in lying and standing blood pressure and neither drug produced a significant alteration in smell recognition, or olfactory or taste threshold. None of the minor changes observed appeared to correlate with either plasma zinc concentrations or intra-erythrocyte zinc levels. This study provides important observations on the use of these new techniques. Based on the wide variability of results obtained, the design of further clinical studies must address and overcome the many factors (age, sex, smoking, etc.) which may confound the study of drug effects on taste and smell.

This study has a target disease

ACE inhibitors in hypertension: assessment of taste and smell function in clinical trials.

Taste and smell disturbances are infrequently reported adverse effects of treatment with captopril and are even less frequently reported with other ACE inhibitors. These adverse effects have been attributed to the chemical structure of the drugs used, although this relationship is the matter of some debate. A link between the taste disturbance associated with ACE inhibitors and changes in plasma zinc concentration has also been suggested, but again the evidence for this relationship is equivocal. One problem facing research in this area has been the lack of reliable assessment techniques for the quantitative evaluation of smell and taste function. Three quantitative methods for evaluating taste and smell function are described, together with the results of a pilot study aimed at evaluating the potential ease of application of these techniques in a larger group of patients. In this double-blind, crossover pilot study, 8-week treatment with lisinopril (20-40 mg once daily) was compared with captopril (25-50 mg twice daily) in 12 hypertensive patients. The two drugs produced similar falls in lying and standing blood pressure and neither drug produced a significant alteration in smell recognition, or olfactory or taste threshold. None of the minor changes observed appeared to correlate with either plasma zinc concentrations or intra-erythrocyte zinc levels. This study provides important observations on the use of these new techniques. Based on the wide variability of results obtained, the design of further clinical studies must address and overcome the many factors (age, sex, smoking, etc.) which may confound the study of drug effects on taste and smell.

This study does not have a target disease

[CHOP-bleo versus m-BACOD in the treatment of intermediate and high-grade malignant lymphomas].

Eighty-three patients with malignant lymphoma of intermediate and high histologic subtypes were randomly assigned to receive induction chemotherapy with either of two intensive regimens: CHOP-Bleo (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, prednisone and bleomycin) or m-BACOD (low-dose methotrexate, bleomycin adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine and dexamethasone). The median follow-up study is 5 years. The two therapies were not significantly different in regard to response rates (52 to 59%), duration of complete remission (27 months vs 24 months) and survival, but m-BACOD was significantly more toxic than CHOP-Bleo. The relative small proportion of long-term disease free-survivors with both regimens underscores the need for other therapeutic approaches.

This study has a cohort study or clinical trial

[CHOP-bleo versus m-BACOD in the treatment of intermediate and high-grade malignant lymphomas].

Eighty-three patients with malignant lymphoma of intermediate and high histologic subtypes were randomly assigned to receive induction chemotherapy with either of two intensive regimens: CHOP-Bleo (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, prednisone and bleomycin) or m-BACOD (low-dose methotrexate, bleomycin adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine and dexamethasone). The median follow-up study is 5 years. The two therapies were not significantly different in regard to response rates (52 to 59%), duration of complete remission (27 months vs 24 months) and survival, but m-BACOD was significantly more toxic than CHOP-Bleo. The relative small proportion of long-term disease free-survivors with both regimens underscores the need for other therapeutic approaches.

This study does not have any cohorts or clinical trial

[CHOP-bleo versus m-BACOD in the treatment of intermediate and high-grade malignant lymphomas].

Eighty-three patients with malignant lymphoma of intermediate and high histologic subtypes were randomly assigned to receive induction chemotherapy with either of two intensive regimens: CHOP-Bleo (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, prednisone and bleomycin) or m-BACOD (low-dose methotrexate, bleomycin adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine and dexamethasone). The median follow-up study is 5 years. The two therapies were not significantly different in regard to response rates (52 to 59%), duration of complete remission (27 months vs 24 months) and survival, but m-BACOD was significantly more toxic than CHOP-Bleo. The relative small proportion of long-term disease free-survivors with both regimens underscores the need for other therapeutic approaches.

This study has a control, double-blind, or comparison patient group

[CHOP-bleo versus m-BACOD in the treatment of intermediate and high-grade malignant lymphomas].

Eighty-three patients with malignant lymphoma of intermediate and high histologic subtypes were randomly assigned to receive induction chemotherapy with either of two intensive regimens: CHOP-Bleo (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, prednisone and bleomycin) or m-BACOD (low-dose methotrexate, bleomycin adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine and dexamethasone). The median follow-up study is 5 years. The two therapies were not significantly different in regard to response rates (52 to 59%), duration of complete remission (27 months vs 24 months) and survival, but m-BACOD was significantly more toxic than CHOP-Bleo. The relative small proportion of long-term disease free-survivors with both regimens underscores the need for other therapeutic approaches.

This study does not have any comparison patient group

[CHOP-bleo versus m-BACOD in the treatment of intermediate and high-grade malignant lymphomas].

Eighty-three patients with malignant lymphoma of intermediate and high histologic subtypes were randomly assigned to receive induction chemotherapy with either of two intensive regimens: CHOP-Bleo (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, prednisone and bleomycin) or m-BACOD (low-dose methotrexate, bleomycin adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine and dexamethasone). The median follow-up study is 5 years. The two therapies were not significantly different in regard to response rates (52 to 59%), duration of complete remission (27 months vs 24 months) and survival, but m-BACOD was significantly more toxic than CHOP-Bleo. The relative small proportion of long-term disease free-survivors with both regimens underscores the need for other therapeutic approaches.

This study has human subjects

[CHOP-bleo versus m-BACOD in the treatment of intermediate and high-grade malignant lymphomas].

Eighty-three patients with malignant lymphoma of intermediate and high histologic subtypes were randomly assigned to receive induction chemotherapy with either of two intensive regimens: CHOP-Bleo (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, prednisone and bleomycin) or m-BACOD (low-dose methotrexate, bleomycin adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine and dexamethasone). The median follow-up study is 5 years. The two therapies were not significantly different in regard to response rates (52 to 59%), duration of complete remission (27 months vs 24 months) and survival, but m-BACOD was significantly more toxic than CHOP-Bleo. The relative small proportion of long-term disease free-survivors with both regimens underscores the need for other therapeutic approaches.

This study does not have human subjects

[CHOP-bleo versus m-BACOD in the treatment of intermediate and high-grade malignant lymphomas].

Eighty-three patients with malignant lymphoma of intermediate and high histologic subtypes were randomly assigned to receive induction chemotherapy with either of two intensive regimens: CHOP-Bleo (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, prednisone and bleomycin) or m-BACOD (low-dose methotrexate, bleomycin adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine and dexamethasone). The median follow-up study is 5 years. The two therapies were not significantly different in regard to response rates (52 to 59%), duration of complete remission (27 months vs 24 months) and survival, but m-BACOD was significantly more toxic than CHOP-Bleo. The relative small proportion of long-term disease free-survivors with both regimens underscores the need for other therapeutic approaches.

This study contains population size or sample size information

[CHOP-bleo versus m-BACOD in the treatment of intermediate and high-grade malignant lymphomas].

Eighty-three patients with malignant lymphoma of intermediate and high histologic subtypes were randomly assigned to receive induction chemotherapy with either of two intensive regimens: CHOP-Bleo (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, prednisone and bleomycin) or m-BACOD (low-dose methotrexate, bleomycin adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine and dexamethasone). The median follow-up study is 5 years. The two therapies were not significantly different in regard to response rates (52 to 59%), duration of complete remission (27 months vs 24 months) and survival, but m-BACOD was significantly more toxic than CHOP-Bleo. The relative small proportion of long-term disease free-survivors with both regimens underscores the need for other therapeutic approaches.

This study does not contain population size information

[CHOP-bleo versus m-BACOD in the treatment of intermediate and high-grade malignant lymphomas].

Eighty-three patients with malignant lymphoma of intermediate and high histologic subtypes were randomly assigned to receive induction chemotherapy with either of two intensive regimens: CHOP-Bleo (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, prednisone and bleomycin) or m-BACOD (low-dose methotrexate, bleomycin adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine and dexamethasone). The median follow-up study is 5 years. The two therapies were not significantly different in regard to response rates (52 to 59%), duration of complete remission (27 months vs 24 months) and survival, but m-BACOD was significantly more toxic than CHOP-Bleo. The relative small proportion of long-term disease free-survivors with both regimens underscores the need for other therapeutic approaches.

This study has quantitative outcomes like numbers, P-value, OR, CI, HR, RR, or patient ratios

[CHOP-bleo versus m-BACOD in the treatment of intermediate and high-grade malignant lymphomas].

Eighty-three patients with malignant lymphoma of intermediate and high histologic subtypes were randomly assigned to receive induction chemotherapy with either of two intensive regimens: CHOP-Bleo (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, prednisone and bleomycin) or m-BACOD (low-dose methotrexate, bleomycin adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine and dexamethasone). The median follow-up study is 5 years. The two therapies were not significantly different in regard to response rates (52 to 59%), duration of complete remission (27 months vs 24 months) and survival, but m-BACOD was significantly more toxic than CHOP-Bleo. The relative small proportion of long-term disease free-survivors with both regimens underscores the need for other therapeutic approaches.

This study does not have any quantitative outcomes

[CHOP-bleo versus m-BACOD in the treatment of intermediate and high-grade malignant lymphomas].

Eighty-three patients with malignant lymphoma of intermediate and high histologic subtypes were randomly assigned to receive induction chemotherapy with either of two intensive regimens: CHOP-Bleo (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, prednisone and bleomycin) or m-BACOD (low-dose methotrexate, bleomycin adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine and dexamethasone). The median follow-up study is 5 years. The two therapies were not significantly different in regard to response rates (52 to 59%), duration of complete remission (27 months vs 24 months) and survival, but m-BACOD was significantly more toxic than CHOP-Bleo. The relative small proportion of long-term disease free-survivors with both regimens underscores the need for other therapeutic approaches.

This study has a target drug

[CHOP-bleo versus m-BACOD in the treatment of intermediate and high-grade malignant lymphomas].

Eighty-three patients with malignant lymphoma of intermediate and high histologic subtypes were randomly assigned to receive induction chemotherapy with either of two intensive regimens: CHOP-Bleo (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, prednisone and bleomycin) or m-BACOD (low-dose methotrexate, bleomycin adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine and dexamethasone). The median follow-up study is 5 years. The two therapies were not significantly different in regard to response rates (52 to 59%), duration of complete remission (27 months vs 24 months) and survival, but m-BACOD was significantly more toxic than CHOP-Bleo. The relative small proportion of long-term disease free-survivors with both regimens underscores the need for other therapeutic approaches.

This study does not have a target drug

[CHOP-bleo versus m-BACOD in the treatment of intermediate and high-grade malignant lymphomas].

Eighty-three patients with malignant lymphoma of intermediate and high histologic subtypes were randomly assigned to receive induction chemotherapy with either of two intensive regimens: CHOP-Bleo (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, prednisone and bleomycin) or m-BACOD (low-dose methotrexate, bleomycin adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine and dexamethasone). The median follow-up study is 5 years. The two therapies were not significantly different in regard to response rates (52 to 59%), duration of complete remission (27 months vs 24 months) and survival, but m-BACOD was significantly more toxic than CHOP-Bleo. The relative small proportion of long-term disease free-survivors with both regimens underscores the need for other therapeutic approaches.

This study has a target disease

[CHOP-bleo versus m-BACOD in the treatment of intermediate and high-grade malignant lymphomas].

Eighty-three patients with malignant lymphoma of intermediate and high histologic subtypes were randomly assigned to receive induction chemotherapy with either of two intensive regimens: CHOP-Bleo (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, prednisone and bleomycin) or m-BACOD (low-dose methotrexate, bleomycin adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine and dexamethasone). The median follow-up study is 5 years. The two therapies were not significantly different in regard to response rates (52 to 59%), duration of complete remission (27 months vs 24 months) and survival, but m-BACOD was significantly more toxic than CHOP-Bleo. The relative small proportion of long-term disease free-survivors with both regimens underscores the need for other therapeutic approaches.

This study does not have a target disease

Four versus six courses of a dose-escalated cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) regimen plus etoposide (megaCHOEP) and autologous stem cell transplantation: early dose intensity is crucial in treating younger patients with poor prognosis aggressive lymphoma.

Patients with aggressive lymphoma and high-risk features at the time of diagnosis are reported to have a poor prognosis with standard therapy. Attempts to improve the results achieved with the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) using second-generation or third-generation chemotherapy have failed. In the current study, the authors increased the doses and dose intensity of drugs used for the conventional first-line therapy of aggressive lymphoma and designed a Phase II randomized trial that compared four and six courses of dose-escalated CHOP plus etoposide (megaCHOEP) supported by the transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells. Eighty-four patients age < 60 years with aggressive lymphoma and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were randomized to receive either 4 (Arm A) or 6 (Arm B) courses of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, etoposide, and prednisone (megaCHOEP). The last three treatment courses were supported by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Although the total doses of cyclophosphamide and etoposide were comparable, the dose intensity during the first 3 treatment courses was planned to be 2.8-fold and 2.0-fold higher, respectively, for patients in Arm A. Thirty-seven patients in Arm A (90.2%) but only 18 patients in Arm B (69.2%) were able to complete therapy (P = 0.048). The complete response rate was 65.8% in Arm A and 50.0% in Arm B; the disease recurrence rates were 18.5% versus 61.5% (P = 0.011). Freedom from treatment failure at 2 years was 52.5% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 36.9-68.2%) in Arm A and 23.1% (95% CI, 6.9-39.3%) in Arm B (P = 0.02). The overall survival rate was 70% (95% CI, 54.9-85.0%) in Arm A and 46.2% (95% CI, 27.0-65.3%) in Arm B (P = 0.037). The results of the current study demonstrate that dose intensity, in particular early dose intensity, significantly influences disease control with high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation. These results also may explain the failure of HDT with low early dose intensity to improve the results obtained with conventional chemotherapy.

This study has a cohort study or clinical trial

Four versus six courses of a dose-escalated cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) regimen plus etoposide (megaCHOEP) and autologous stem cell transplantation: early dose intensity is crucial in treating younger patients with poor prognosis aggressive lymphoma.

Patients with aggressive lymphoma and high-risk features at the time of diagnosis are reported to have a poor prognosis with standard therapy. Attempts to improve the results achieved with the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) using second-generation or third-generation chemotherapy have failed. In the current study, the authors increased the doses and dose intensity of drugs used for the conventional first-line therapy of aggressive lymphoma and designed a Phase II randomized trial that compared four and six courses of dose-escalated CHOP plus etoposide (megaCHOEP) supported by the transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells. Eighty-four patients age < 60 years with aggressive lymphoma and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were randomized to receive either 4 (Arm A) or 6 (Arm B) courses of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, etoposide, and prednisone (megaCHOEP). The last three treatment courses were supported by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Although the total doses of cyclophosphamide and etoposide were comparable, the dose intensity during the first 3 treatment courses was planned to be 2.8-fold and 2.0-fold higher, respectively, for patients in Arm A. Thirty-seven patients in Arm A (90.2%) but only 18 patients in Arm B (69.2%) were able to complete therapy (P = 0.048). The complete response rate was 65.8% in Arm A and 50.0% in Arm B; the disease recurrence rates were 18.5% versus 61.5% (P = 0.011). Freedom from treatment failure at 2 years was 52.5% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 36.9-68.2%) in Arm A and 23.1% (95% CI, 6.9-39.3%) in Arm B (P = 0.02). The overall survival rate was 70% (95% CI, 54.9-85.0%) in Arm A and 46.2% (95% CI, 27.0-65.3%) in Arm B (P = 0.037). The results of the current study demonstrate that dose intensity, in particular early dose intensity, significantly influences disease control with high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation. These results also may explain the failure of HDT with low early dose intensity to improve the results obtained with conventional chemotherapy.

This study does not have any cohorts or clinical trial

Four versus six courses of a dose-escalated cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) regimen plus etoposide (megaCHOEP) and autologous stem cell transplantation: early dose intensity is crucial in treating younger patients with poor prognosis aggressive lymphoma.

Patients with aggressive lymphoma and high-risk features at the time of diagnosis are reported to have a poor prognosis with standard therapy. Attempts to improve the results achieved with the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) using second-generation or third-generation chemotherapy have failed. In the current study, the authors increased the doses and dose intensity of drugs used for the conventional first-line therapy of aggressive lymphoma and designed a Phase II randomized trial that compared four and six courses of dose-escalated CHOP plus etoposide (megaCHOEP) supported by the transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells. Eighty-four patients age < 60 years with aggressive lymphoma and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were randomized to receive either 4 (Arm A) or 6 (Arm B) courses of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, etoposide, and prednisone (megaCHOEP). The last three treatment courses were supported by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Although the total doses of cyclophosphamide and etoposide were comparable, the dose intensity during the first 3 treatment courses was planned to be 2.8-fold and 2.0-fold higher, respectively, for patients in Arm A. Thirty-seven patients in Arm A (90.2%) but only 18 patients in Arm B (69.2%) were able to complete therapy (P = 0.048). The complete response rate was 65.8% in Arm A and 50.0% in Arm B; the disease recurrence rates were 18.5% versus 61.5% (P = 0.011). Freedom from treatment failure at 2 years was 52.5% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 36.9-68.2%) in Arm A and 23.1% (95% CI, 6.9-39.3%) in Arm B (P = 0.02). The overall survival rate was 70% (95% CI, 54.9-85.0%) in Arm A and 46.2% (95% CI, 27.0-65.3%) in Arm B (P = 0.037). The results of the current study demonstrate that dose intensity, in particular early dose intensity, significantly influences disease control with high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation. These results also may explain the failure of HDT with low early dose intensity to improve the results obtained with conventional chemotherapy.

This study has a control, double-blind, or comparison patient group

Four versus six courses of a dose-escalated cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) regimen plus etoposide (megaCHOEP) and autologous stem cell transplantation: early dose intensity is crucial in treating younger patients with poor prognosis aggressive lymphoma.

Patients with aggressive lymphoma and high-risk features at the time of diagnosis are reported to have a poor prognosis with standard therapy. Attempts to improve the results achieved with the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) using second-generation or third-generation chemotherapy have failed. In the current study, the authors increased the doses and dose intensity of drugs used for the conventional first-line therapy of aggressive lymphoma and designed a Phase II randomized trial that compared four and six courses of dose-escalated CHOP plus etoposide (megaCHOEP) supported by the transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells. Eighty-four patients age < 60 years with aggressive lymphoma and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were randomized to receive either 4 (Arm A) or 6 (Arm B) courses of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, etoposide, and prednisone (megaCHOEP). The last three treatment courses were supported by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Although the total doses of cyclophosphamide and etoposide were comparable, the dose intensity during the first 3 treatment courses was planned to be 2.8-fold and 2.0-fold higher, respectively, for patients in Arm A. Thirty-seven patients in Arm A (90.2%) but only 18 patients in Arm B (69.2%) were able to complete therapy (P = 0.048). The complete response rate was 65.8% in Arm A and 50.0% in Arm B; the disease recurrence rates were 18.5% versus 61.5% (P = 0.011). Freedom from treatment failure at 2 years was 52.5% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 36.9-68.2%) in Arm A and 23.1% (95% CI, 6.9-39.3%) in Arm B (P = 0.02). The overall survival rate was 70% (95% CI, 54.9-85.0%) in Arm A and 46.2% (95% CI, 27.0-65.3%) in Arm B (P = 0.037). The results of the current study demonstrate that dose intensity, in particular early dose intensity, significantly influences disease control with high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation. These results also may explain the failure of HDT with low early dose intensity to improve the results obtained with conventional chemotherapy.

This study does not have any comparison patient group

Four versus six courses of a dose-escalated cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) regimen plus etoposide (megaCHOEP) and autologous stem cell transplantation: early dose intensity is crucial in treating younger patients with poor prognosis aggressive lymphoma.

Patients with aggressive lymphoma and high-risk features at the time of diagnosis are reported to have a poor prognosis with standard therapy. Attempts to improve the results achieved with the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) using second-generation or third-generation chemotherapy have failed. In the current study, the authors increased the doses and dose intensity of drugs used for the conventional first-line therapy of aggressive lymphoma and designed a Phase II randomized trial that compared four and six courses of dose-escalated CHOP plus etoposide (megaCHOEP) supported by the transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells. Eighty-four patients age < 60 years with aggressive lymphoma and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were randomized to receive either 4 (Arm A) or 6 (Arm B) courses of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, etoposide, and prednisone (megaCHOEP). The last three treatment courses were supported by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Although the total doses of cyclophosphamide and etoposide were comparable, the dose intensity during the first 3 treatment courses was planned to be 2.8-fold and 2.0-fold higher, respectively, for patients in Arm A. Thirty-seven patients in Arm A (90.2%) but only 18 patients in Arm B (69.2%) were able to complete therapy (P = 0.048). The complete response rate was 65.8% in Arm A and 50.0% in Arm B; the disease recurrence rates were 18.5% versus 61.5% (P = 0.011). Freedom from treatment failure at 2 years was 52.5% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 36.9-68.2%) in Arm A and 23.1% (95% CI, 6.9-39.3%) in Arm B (P = 0.02). The overall survival rate was 70% (95% CI, 54.9-85.0%) in Arm A and 46.2% (95% CI, 27.0-65.3%) in Arm B (P = 0.037). The results of the current study demonstrate that dose intensity, in particular early dose intensity, significantly influences disease control with high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation. These results also may explain the failure of HDT with low early dose intensity to improve the results obtained with conventional chemotherapy.

This study has human subjects

Four versus six courses of a dose-escalated cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) regimen plus etoposide (megaCHOEP) and autologous stem cell transplantation: early dose intensity is crucial in treating younger patients with poor prognosis aggressive lymphoma.

Patients with aggressive lymphoma and high-risk features at the time of diagnosis are reported to have a poor prognosis with standard therapy. Attempts to improve the results achieved with the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) using second-generation or third-generation chemotherapy have failed. In the current study, the authors increased the doses and dose intensity of drugs used for the conventional first-line therapy of aggressive lymphoma and designed a Phase II randomized trial that compared four and six courses of dose-escalated CHOP plus etoposide (megaCHOEP) supported by the transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells. Eighty-four patients age < 60 years with aggressive lymphoma and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were randomized to receive either 4 (Arm A) or 6 (Arm B) courses of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, etoposide, and prednisone (megaCHOEP). The last three treatment courses were supported by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Although the total doses of cyclophosphamide and etoposide were comparable, the dose intensity during the first 3 treatment courses was planned to be 2.8-fold and 2.0-fold higher, respectively, for patients in Arm A. Thirty-seven patients in Arm A (90.2%) but only 18 patients in Arm B (69.2%) were able to complete therapy (P = 0.048). The complete response rate was 65.8% in Arm A and 50.0% in Arm B; the disease recurrence rates were 18.5% versus 61.5% (P = 0.011). Freedom from treatment failure at 2 years was 52.5% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 36.9-68.2%) in Arm A and 23.1% (95% CI, 6.9-39.3%) in Arm B (P = 0.02). The overall survival rate was 70% (95% CI, 54.9-85.0%) in Arm A and 46.2% (95% CI, 27.0-65.3%) in Arm B (P = 0.037). The results of the current study demonstrate that dose intensity, in particular early dose intensity, significantly influences disease control with high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation. These results also may explain the failure of HDT with low early dose intensity to improve the results obtained with conventional chemotherapy.

This study does not have human subjects

Four versus six courses of a dose-escalated cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) regimen plus etoposide (megaCHOEP) and autologous stem cell transplantation: early dose intensity is crucial in treating younger patients with poor prognosis aggressive lymphoma.

Patients with aggressive lymphoma and high-risk features at the time of diagnosis are reported to have a poor prognosis with standard therapy. Attempts to improve the results achieved with the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) using second-generation or third-generation chemotherapy have failed. In the current study, the authors increased the doses and dose intensity of drugs used for the conventional first-line therapy of aggressive lymphoma and designed a Phase II randomized trial that compared four and six courses of dose-escalated CHOP plus etoposide (megaCHOEP) supported by the transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells. Eighty-four patients age < 60 years with aggressive lymphoma and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were randomized to receive either 4 (Arm A) or 6 (Arm B) courses of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, etoposide, and prednisone (megaCHOEP). The last three treatment courses were supported by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Although the total doses of cyclophosphamide and etoposide were comparable, the dose intensity during the first 3 treatment courses was planned to be 2.8-fold and 2.0-fold higher, respectively, for patients in Arm A. Thirty-seven patients in Arm A (90.2%) but only 18 patients in Arm B (69.2%) were able to complete therapy (P = 0.048). The complete response rate was 65.8% in Arm A and 50.0% in Arm B; the disease recurrence rates were 18.5% versus 61.5% (P = 0.011). Freedom from treatment failure at 2 years was 52.5% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 36.9-68.2%) in Arm A and 23.1% (95% CI, 6.9-39.3%) in Arm B (P = 0.02). The overall survival rate was 70% (95% CI, 54.9-85.0%) in Arm A and 46.2% (95% CI, 27.0-65.3%) in Arm B (P = 0.037). The results of the current study demonstrate that dose intensity, in particular early dose intensity, significantly influences disease control with high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation. These results also may explain the failure of HDT with low early dose intensity to improve the results obtained with conventional chemotherapy.

This study contains population size or sample size information

Four versus six courses of a dose-escalated cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) regimen plus etoposide (megaCHOEP) and autologous stem cell transplantation: early dose intensity is crucial in treating younger patients with poor prognosis aggressive lymphoma.

Patients with aggressive lymphoma and high-risk features at the time of diagnosis are reported to have a poor prognosis with standard therapy. Attempts to improve the results achieved with the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) using second-generation or third-generation chemotherapy have failed. In the current study, the authors increased the doses and dose intensity of drugs used for the conventional first-line therapy of aggressive lymphoma and designed a Phase II randomized trial that compared four and six courses of dose-escalated CHOP plus etoposide (megaCHOEP) supported by the transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells. Eighty-four patients age < 60 years with aggressive lymphoma and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were randomized to receive either 4 (Arm A) or 6 (Arm B) courses of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, etoposide, and prednisone (megaCHOEP). The last three treatment courses were supported by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Although the total doses of cyclophosphamide and etoposide were comparable, the dose intensity during the first 3 treatment courses was planned to be 2.8-fold and 2.0-fold higher, respectively, for patients in Arm A. Thirty-seven patients in Arm A (90.2%) but only 18 patients in Arm B (69.2%) were able to complete therapy (P = 0.048). The complete response rate was 65.8% in Arm A and 50.0% in Arm B; the disease recurrence rates were 18.5% versus 61.5% (P = 0.011). Freedom from treatment failure at 2 years was 52.5% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 36.9-68.2%) in Arm A and 23.1% (95% CI, 6.9-39.3%) in Arm B (P = 0.02). The overall survival rate was 70% (95% CI, 54.9-85.0%) in Arm A and 46.2% (95% CI, 27.0-65.3%) in Arm B (P = 0.037). The results of the current study demonstrate that dose intensity, in particular early dose intensity, significantly influences disease control with high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation. These results also may explain the failure of HDT with low early dose intensity to improve the results obtained with conventional chemotherapy.

This study does not contain population size information

Four versus six courses of a dose-escalated cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) regimen plus etoposide (megaCHOEP) and autologous stem cell transplantation: early dose intensity is crucial in treating younger patients with poor prognosis aggressive lymphoma.

Patients with aggressive lymphoma and high-risk features at the time of diagnosis are reported to have a poor prognosis with standard therapy. Attempts to improve the results achieved with the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) using second-generation or third-generation chemotherapy have failed. In the current study, the authors increased the doses and dose intensity of drugs used for the conventional first-line therapy of aggressive lymphoma and designed a Phase II randomized trial that compared four and six courses of dose-escalated CHOP plus etoposide (megaCHOEP) supported by the transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells. Eighty-four patients age < 60 years with aggressive lymphoma and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were randomized to receive either 4 (Arm A) or 6 (Arm B) courses of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, etoposide, and prednisone (megaCHOEP). The last three treatment courses were supported by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Although the total doses of cyclophosphamide and etoposide were comparable, the dose intensity during the first 3 treatment courses was planned to be 2.8-fold and 2.0-fold higher, respectively, for patients in Arm A. Thirty-seven patients in Arm A (90.2%) but only 18 patients in Arm B (69.2%) were able to complete therapy (P = 0.048). The complete response rate was 65.8% in Arm A and 50.0% in Arm B; the disease recurrence rates were 18.5% versus 61.5% (P = 0.011). Freedom from treatment failure at 2 years was 52.5% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 36.9-68.2%) in Arm A and 23.1% (95% CI, 6.9-39.3%) in Arm B (P = 0.02). The overall survival rate was 70% (95% CI, 54.9-85.0%) in Arm A and 46.2% (95% CI, 27.0-65.3%) in Arm B (P = 0.037). The results of the current study demonstrate that dose intensity, in particular early dose intensity, significantly influences disease control with high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation. These results also may explain the failure of HDT with low early dose intensity to improve the results obtained with conventional chemotherapy.

This study has quantitative outcomes like numbers, P-value, OR, CI, HR, RR, or patient ratios

Four versus six courses of a dose-escalated cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) regimen plus etoposide (megaCHOEP) and autologous stem cell transplantation: early dose intensity is crucial in treating younger patients with poor prognosis aggressive lymphoma.

Patients with aggressive lymphoma and high-risk features at the time of diagnosis are reported to have a poor prognosis with standard therapy. Attempts to improve the results achieved with the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) using second-generation or third-generation chemotherapy have failed. In the current study, the authors increased the doses and dose intensity of drugs used for the conventional first-line therapy of aggressive lymphoma and designed a Phase II randomized trial that compared four and six courses of dose-escalated CHOP plus etoposide (megaCHOEP) supported by the transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells. Eighty-four patients age < 60 years with aggressive lymphoma and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were randomized to receive either 4 (Arm A) or 6 (Arm B) courses of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, etoposide, and prednisone (megaCHOEP). The last three treatment courses were supported by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Although the total doses of cyclophosphamide and etoposide were comparable, the dose intensity during the first 3 treatment courses was planned to be 2.8-fold and 2.0-fold higher, respectively, for patients in Arm A. Thirty-seven patients in Arm A (90.2%) but only 18 patients in Arm B (69.2%) were able to complete therapy (P = 0.048). The complete response rate was 65.8% in Arm A and 50.0% in Arm B; the disease recurrence rates were 18.5% versus 61.5% (P = 0.011). Freedom from treatment failure at 2 years was 52.5% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 36.9-68.2%) in Arm A and 23.1% (95% CI, 6.9-39.3%) in Arm B (P = 0.02). The overall survival rate was 70% (95% CI, 54.9-85.0%) in Arm A and 46.2% (95% CI, 27.0-65.3%) in Arm B (P = 0.037). The results of the current study demonstrate that dose intensity, in particular early dose intensity, significantly influences disease control with high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation. These results also may explain the failure of HDT with low early dose intensity to improve the results obtained with conventional chemotherapy.

This study does not have any quantitative outcomes

Four versus six courses of a dose-escalated cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) regimen plus etoposide (megaCHOEP) and autologous stem cell transplantation: early dose intensity is crucial in treating younger patients with poor prognosis aggressive lymphoma.

Patients with aggressive lymphoma and high-risk features at the time of diagnosis are reported to have a poor prognosis with standard therapy. Attempts to improve the results achieved with the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) using second-generation or third-generation chemotherapy have failed. In the current study, the authors increased the doses and dose intensity of drugs used for the conventional first-line therapy of aggressive lymphoma and designed a Phase II randomized trial that compared four and six courses of dose-escalated CHOP plus etoposide (megaCHOEP) supported by the transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells. Eighty-four patients age < 60 years with aggressive lymphoma and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were randomized to receive either 4 (Arm A) or 6 (Arm B) courses of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, etoposide, and prednisone (megaCHOEP). The last three treatment courses were supported by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Although the total doses of cyclophosphamide and etoposide were comparable, the dose intensity during the first 3 treatment courses was planned to be 2.8-fold and 2.0-fold higher, respectively, for patients in Arm A. Thirty-seven patients in Arm A (90.2%) but only 18 patients in Arm B (69.2%) were able to complete therapy (P = 0.048). The complete response rate was 65.8% in Arm A and 50.0% in Arm B; the disease recurrence rates were 18.5% versus 61.5% (P = 0.011). Freedom from treatment failure at 2 years was 52.5% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 36.9-68.2%) in Arm A and 23.1% (95% CI, 6.9-39.3%) in Arm B (P = 0.02). The overall survival rate was 70% (95% CI, 54.9-85.0%) in Arm A and 46.2% (95% CI, 27.0-65.3%) in Arm B (P = 0.037). The results of the current study demonstrate that dose intensity, in particular early dose intensity, significantly influences disease control with high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation. These results also may explain the failure of HDT with low early dose intensity to improve the results obtained with conventional chemotherapy.

This study has a target drug

Four versus six courses of a dose-escalated cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) regimen plus etoposide (megaCHOEP) and autologous stem cell transplantation: early dose intensity is crucial in treating younger patients with poor prognosis aggressive lymphoma.

Patients with aggressive lymphoma and high-risk features at the time of diagnosis are reported to have a poor prognosis with standard therapy. Attempts to improve the results achieved with the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) using second-generation or third-generation chemotherapy have failed. In the current study, the authors increased the doses and dose intensity of drugs used for the conventional first-line therapy of aggressive lymphoma and designed a Phase II randomized trial that compared four and six courses of dose-escalated CHOP plus etoposide (megaCHOEP) supported by the transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells. Eighty-four patients age < 60 years with aggressive lymphoma and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were randomized to receive either 4 (Arm A) or 6 (Arm B) courses of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, etoposide, and prednisone (megaCHOEP). The last three treatment courses were supported by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Although the total doses of cyclophosphamide and etoposide were comparable, the dose intensity during the first 3 treatment courses was planned to be 2.8-fold and 2.0-fold higher, respectively, for patients in Arm A. Thirty-seven patients in Arm A (90.2%) but only 18 patients in Arm B (69.2%) were able to complete therapy (P = 0.048). The complete response rate was 65.8% in Arm A and 50.0% in Arm B; the disease recurrence rates were 18.5% versus 61.5% (P = 0.011). Freedom from treatment failure at 2 years was 52.5% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 36.9-68.2%) in Arm A and 23.1% (95% CI, 6.9-39.3%) in Arm B (P = 0.02). The overall survival rate was 70% (95% CI, 54.9-85.0%) in Arm A and 46.2% (95% CI, 27.0-65.3%) in Arm B (P = 0.037). The results of the current study demonstrate that dose intensity, in particular early dose intensity, significantly influences disease control with high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation. These results also may explain the failure of HDT with low early dose intensity to improve the results obtained with conventional chemotherapy.

This study does not have a target drug

Four versus six courses of a dose-escalated cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) regimen plus etoposide (megaCHOEP) and autologous stem cell transplantation: early dose intensity is crucial in treating younger patients with poor prognosis aggressive lymphoma.

Patients with aggressive lymphoma and high-risk features at the time of diagnosis are reported to have a poor prognosis with standard therapy. Attempts to improve the results achieved with the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) using second-generation or third-generation chemotherapy have failed. In the current study, the authors increased the doses and dose intensity of drugs used for the conventional first-line therapy of aggressive lymphoma and designed a Phase II randomized trial that compared four and six courses of dose-escalated CHOP plus etoposide (megaCHOEP) supported by the transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells. Eighty-four patients age < 60 years with aggressive lymphoma and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were randomized to receive either 4 (Arm A) or 6 (Arm B) courses of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, etoposide, and prednisone (megaCHOEP). The last three treatment courses were supported by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Although the total doses of cyclophosphamide and etoposide were comparable, the dose intensity during the first 3 treatment courses was planned to be 2.8-fold and 2.0-fold higher, respectively, for patients in Arm A. Thirty-seven patients in Arm A (90.2%) but only 18 patients in Arm B (69.2%) were able to complete therapy (P = 0.048). The complete response rate was 65.8% in Arm A and 50.0% in Arm B; the disease recurrence rates were 18.5% versus 61.5% (P = 0.011). Freedom from treatment failure at 2 years was 52.5% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 36.9-68.2%) in Arm A and 23.1% (95% CI, 6.9-39.3%) in Arm B (P = 0.02). The overall survival rate was 70% (95% CI, 54.9-85.0%) in Arm A and 46.2% (95% CI, 27.0-65.3%) in Arm B (P = 0.037). The results of the current study demonstrate that dose intensity, in particular early dose intensity, significantly influences disease control with high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation. These results also may explain the failure of HDT with low early dose intensity to improve the results obtained with conventional chemotherapy.

This study has a target disease

Four versus six courses of a dose-escalated cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) regimen plus etoposide (megaCHOEP) and autologous stem cell transplantation: early dose intensity is crucial in treating younger patients with poor prognosis aggressive lymphoma.

Patients with aggressive lymphoma and high-risk features at the time of diagnosis are reported to have a poor prognosis with standard therapy. Attempts to improve the results achieved with the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) using second-generation or third-generation chemotherapy have failed. In the current study, the authors increased the doses and dose intensity of drugs used for the conventional first-line therapy of aggressive lymphoma and designed a Phase II randomized trial that compared four and six courses of dose-escalated CHOP plus etoposide (megaCHOEP) supported by the transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells. Eighty-four patients age < 60 years with aggressive lymphoma and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were randomized to receive either 4 (Arm A) or 6 (Arm B) courses of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, etoposide, and prednisone (megaCHOEP). The last three treatment courses were supported by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Although the total doses of cyclophosphamide and etoposide were comparable, the dose intensity during the first 3 treatment courses was planned to be 2.8-fold and 2.0-fold higher, respectively, for patients in Arm A. Thirty-seven patients in Arm A (90.2%) but only 18 patients in Arm B (69.2%) were able to complete therapy (P = 0.048). The complete response rate was 65.8% in Arm A and 50.0% in Arm B; the disease recurrence rates were 18.5% versus 61.5% (P = 0.011). Freedom from treatment failure at 2 years was 52.5% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 36.9-68.2%) in Arm A and 23.1% (95% CI, 6.9-39.3%) in Arm B (P = 0.02). The overall survival rate was 70% (95% CI, 54.9-85.0%) in Arm A and 46.2% (95% CI, 27.0-65.3%) in Arm B (P = 0.037). The results of the current study demonstrate that dose intensity, in particular early dose intensity, significantly influences disease control with high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation. These results also may explain the failure of HDT with low early dose intensity to improve the results obtained with conventional chemotherapy.

This study does not have a target disease

The impact of primary antibiotic resistance on the efficacy of ranitidine bismuth citrate- vs. omeprazole-based one-week triple therapies in H. pylori eradication--a randomised controlled trial.

To compare ranitidine bismuth citrate with omeprazole as to their efficacy to eradicate H. pylori in two different treatment schedules both consisting of a combination of either of above with two antibiotics for 1 week, and to relate these treatment results to primary antibiotic resistance. 256 H. pylori positive patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia were randomised to one of the following four treatment groups: omeprazole 20 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + amoxycillin 1000 mg (OCA); ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + amoxycillin 1000 mg (RBCCA); omeprazole 20 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + metronidazole 500 mg (OCM); ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + metronidazole 500 mg (RBCCM). All drugs were given twice daily for one week. The patients were assessed for prevalence of H. pylori by CLO test, histology and culture on gastric biopsy samples obtained during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before randomisation and 4-6 weeks after completion of therapy. Bacterial sensitivity to clarithromycin, metronidazole and amoxycillin was determined by E-test. On per-protocol analysis, overall eradication rates were 96% for RBCCA vs. 85% for OCA (p = 0.03), and 95% for RBCCM vs. 79% for OCM (p = 0.01). Amongst the 196 patients (77% of the entire study group) in whom antibiotic sensitivity testing was technically feasible, primary resistance was found in 8% for clarithromycin, in 33% for metronidazole, and in 0% for amoxycillin. Eradication of clarithromycin sensitive/resistant strains was 89%/40% for OCA (p = 0.0042) and 98%/80% for RBCCA (p = 0.0428). When strains were sensitive to both antibiotics, cure rates with OCM/RBCCM were 87%/96% respectively (p = 0.39), for strains resistant to clarithromycin only, eradication was achieved in 82% with OCM vs. 94% with RBCCM (p = 0.2), and in the case of metronidazole resistance in 85% with OCM vs. 94% with RBCCM (p = 0.09). Ranitidine bismuth citrate in combination with clarithromycin and either metronidazole or amoxycillin produced higher eradication rates than omeprazole co-administered with the same antibiotics. This appeared especially prominent in the subgroups with clarithromycin resistance without, however, reaching statistical significance. Efficacy of neither eradication regimen was influenced by metronidazole sensitivity to a significant degree.

This study has a cohort study or clinical trial

The impact of primary antibiotic resistance on the efficacy of ranitidine bismuth citrate- vs. omeprazole-based one-week triple therapies in H. pylori eradication--a randomised controlled trial.

To compare ranitidine bismuth citrate with omeprazole as to their efficacy to eradicate H. pylori in two different treatment schedules both consisting of a combination of either of above with two antibiotics for 1 week, and to relate these treatment results to primary antibiotic resistance. 256 H. pylori positive patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia were randomised to one of the following four treatment groups: omeprazole 20 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + amoxycillin 1000 mg (OCA); ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + amoxycillin 1000 mg (RBCCA); omeprazole 20 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + metronidazole 500 mg (OCM); ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + metronidazole 500 mg (RBCCM). All drugs were given twice daily for one week. The patients were assessed for prevalence of H. pylori by CLO test, histology and culture on gastric biopsy samples obtained during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before randomisation and 4-6 weeks after completion of therapy. Bacterial sensitivity to clarithromycin, metronidazole and amoxycillin was determined by E-test. On per-protocol analysis, overall eradication rates were 96% for RBCCA vs. 85% for OCA (p = 0.03), and 95% for RBCCM vs. 79% for OCM (p = 0.01). Amongst the 196 patients (77% of the entire study group) in whom antibiotic sensitivity testing was technically feasible, primary resistance was found in 8% for clarithromycin, in 33% for metronidazole, and in 0% for amoxycillin. Eradication of clarithromycin sensitive/resistant strains was 89%/40% for OCA (p = 0.0042) and 98%/80% for RBCCA (p = 0.0428). When strains were sensitive to both antibiotics, cure rates with OCM/RBCCM were 87%/96% respectively (p = 0.39), for strains resistant to clarithromycin only, eradication was achieved in 82% with OCM vs. 94% with RBCCM (p = 0.2), and in the case of metronidazole resistance in 85% with OCM vs. 94% with RBCCM (p = 0.09). Ranitidine bismuth citrate in combination with clarithromycin and either metronidazole or amoxycillin produced higher eradication rates than omeprazole co-administered with the same antibiotics. This appeared especially prominent in the subgroups with clarithromycin resistance without, however, reaching statistical significance. Efficacy of neither eradication regimen was influenced by metronidazole sensitivity to a significant degree.

This study does not have any cohorts or clinical trial

The impact of primary antibiotic resistance on the efficacy of ranitidine bismuth citrate- vs. omeprazole-based one-week triple therapies in H. pylori eradication--a randomised controlled trial.

To compare ranitidine bismuth citrate with omeprazole as to their efficacy to eradicate H. pylori in two different treatment schedules both consisting of a combination of either of above with two antibiotics for 1 week, and to relate these treatment results to primary antibiotic resistance. 256 H. pylori positive patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia were randomised to one of the following four treatment groups: omeprazole 20 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + amoxycillin 1000 mg (OCA); ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + amoxycillin 1000 mg (RBCCA); omeprazole 20 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + metronidazole 500 mg (OCM); ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + metronidazole 500 mg (RBCCM). All drugs were given twice daily for one week. The patients were assessed for prevalence of H. pylori by CLO test, histology and culture on gastric biopsy samples obtained during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before randomisation and 4-6 weeks after completion of therapy. Bacterial sensitivity to clarithromycin, metronidazole and amoxycillin was determined by E-test. On per-protocol analysis, overall eradication rates were 96% for RBCCA vs. 85% for OCA (p = 0.03), and 95% for RBCCM vs. 79% for OCM (p = 0.01). Amongst the 196 patients (77% of the entire study group) in whom antibiotic sensitivity testing was technically feasible, primary resistance was found in 8% for clarithromycin, in 33% for metronidazole, and in 0% for amoxycillin. Eradication of clarithromycin sensitive/resistant strains was 89%/40% for OCA (p = 0.0042) and 98%/80% for RBCCA (p = 0.0428). When strains were sensitive to both antibiotics, cure rates with OCM/RBCCM were 87%/96% respectively (p = 0.39), for strains resistant to clarithromycin only, eradication was achieved in 82% with OCM vs. 94% with RBCCM (p = 0.2), and in the case of metronidazole resistance in 85% with OCM vs. 94% with RBCCM (p = 0.09). Ranitidine bismuth citrate in combination with clarithromycin and either metronidazole or amoxycillin produced higher eradication rates than omeprazole co-administered with the same antibiotics. This appeared especially prominent in the subgroups with clarithromycin resistance without, however, reaching statistical significance. Efficacy of neither eradication regimen was influenced by metronidazole sensitivity to a significant degree.

This study has a control, double-blind, or comparison patient group

The impact of primary antibiotic resistance on the efficacy of ranitidine bismuth citrate- vs. omeprazole-based one-week triple therapies in H. pylori eradication--a randomised controlled trial.

To compare ranitidine bismuth citrate with omeprazole as to their efficacy to eradicate H. pylori in two different treatment schedules both consisting of a combination of either of above with two antibiotics for 1 week, and to relate these treatment results to primary antibiotic resistance. 256 H. pylori positive patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia were randomised to one of the following four treatment groups: omeprazole 20 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + amoxycillin 1000 mg (OCA); ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + amoxycillin 1000 mg (RBCCA); omeprazole 20 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + metronidazole 500 mg (OCM); ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + metronidazole 500 mg (RBCCM). All drugs were given twice daily for one week. The patients were assessed for prevalence of H. pylori by CLO test, histology and culture on gastric biopsy samples obtained during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before randomisation and 4-6 weeks after completion of therapy. Bacterial sensitivity to clarithromycin, metronidazole and amoxycillin was determined by E-test. On per-protocol analysis, overall eradication rates were 96% for RBCCA vs. 85% for OCA (p = 0.03), and 95% for RBCCM vs. 79% for OCM (p = 0.01). Amongst the 196 patients (77% of the entire study group) in whom antibiotic sensitivity testing was technically feasible, primary resistance was found in 8% for clarithromycin, in 33% for metronidazole, and in 0% for amoxycillin. Eradication of clarithromycin sensitive/resistant strains was 89%/40% for OCA (p = 0.0042) and 98%/80% for RBCCA (p = 0.0428). When strains were sensitive to both antibiotics, cure rates with OCM/RBCCM were 87%/96% respectively (p = 0.39), for strains resistant to clarithromycin only, eradication was achieved in 82% with OCM vs. 94% with RBCCM (p = 0.2), and in the case of metronidazole resistance in 85% with OCM vs. 94% with RBCCM (p = 0.09). Ranitidine bismuth citrate in combination with clarithromycin and either metronidazole or amoxycillin produced higher eradication rates than omeprazole co-administered with the same antibiotics. This appeared especially prominent in the subgroups with clarithromycin resistance without, however, reaching statistical significance. Efficacy of neither eradication regimen was influenced by metronidazole sensitivity to a significant degree.

This study does not have any comparison patient group

The impact of primary antibiotic resistance on the efficacy of ranitidine bismuth citrate- vs. omeprazole-based one-week triple therapies in H. pylori eradication--a randomised controlled trial.

To compare ranitidine bismuth citrate with omeprazole as to their efficacy to eradicate H. pylori in two different treatment schedules both consisting of a combination of either of above with two antibiotics for 1 week, and to relate these treatment results to primary antibiotic resistance. 256 H. pylori positive patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia were randomised to one of the following four treatment groups: omeprazole 20 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + amoxycillin 1000 mg (OCA); ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + amoxycillin 1000 mg (RBCCA); omeprazole 20 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + metronidazole 500 mg (OCM); ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + metronidazole 500 mg (RBCCM). All drugs were given twice daily for one week. The patients were assessed for prevalence of H. pylori by CLO test, histology and culture on gastric biopsy samples obtained during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before randomisation and 4-6 weeks after completion of therapy. Bacterial sensitivity to clarithromycin, metronidazole and amoxycillin was determined by E-test. On per-protocol analysis, overall eradication rates were 96% for RBCCA vs. 85% for OCA (p = 0.03), and 95% for RBCCM vs. 79% for OCM (p = 0.01). Amongst the 196 patients (77% of the entire study group) in whom antibiotic sensitivity testing was technically feasible, primary resistance was found in 8% for clarithromycin, in 33% for metronidazole, and in 0% for amoxycillin. Eradication of clarithromycin sensitive/resistant strains was 89%/40% for OCA (p = 0.0042) and 98%/80% for RBCCA (p = 0.0428). When strains were sensitive to both antibiotics, cure rates with OCM/RBCCM were 87%/96% respectively (p = 0.39), for strains resistant to clarithromycin only, eradication was achieved in 82% with OCM vs. 94% with RBCCM (p = 0.2), and in the case of metronidazole resistance in 85% with OCM vs. 94% with RBCCM (p = 0.09). Ranitidine bismuth citrate in combination with clarithromycin and either metronidazole or amoxycillin produced higher eradication rates than omeprazole co-administered with the same antibiotics. This appeared especially prominent in the subgroups with clarithromycin resistance without, however, reaching statistical significance. Efficacy of neither eradication regimen was influenced by metronidazole sensitivity to a significant degree.

This study has human subjects

The impact of primary antibiotic resistance on the efficacy of ranitidine bismuth citrate- vs. omeprazole-based one-week triple therapies in H. pylori eradication--a randomised controlled trial.

To compare ranitidine bismuth citrate with omeprazole as to their efficacy to eradicate H. pylori in two different treatment schedules both consisting of a combination of either of above with two antibiotics for 1 week, and to relate these treatment results to primary antibiotic resistance. 256 H. pylori positive patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia were randomised to one of the following four treatment groups: omeprazole 20 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + amoxycillin 1000 mg (OCA); ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + amoxycillin 1000 mg (RBCCA); omeprazole 20 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + metronidazole 500 mg (OCM); ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + metronidazole 500 mg (RBCCM). All drugs were given twice daily for one week. The patients were assessed for prevalence of H. pylori by CLO test, histology and culture on gastric biopsy samples obtained during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before randomisation and 4-6 weeks after completion of therapy. Bacterial sensitivity to clarithromycin, metronidazole and amoxycillin was determined by E-test. On per-protocol analysis, overall eradication rates were 96% for RBCCA vs. 85% for OCA (p = 0.03), and 95% for RBCCM vs. 79% for OCM (p = 0.01). Amongst the 196 patients (77% of the entire study group) in whom antibiotic sensitivity testing was technically feasible, primary resistance was found in 8% for clarithromycin, in 33% for metronidazole, and in 0% for amoxycillin. Eradication of clarithromycin sensitive/resistant strains was 89%/40% for OCA (p = 0.0042) and 98%/80% for RBCCA (p = 0.0428). When strains were sensitive to both antibiotics, cure rates with OCM/RBCCM were 87%/96% respectively (p = 0.39), for strains resistant to clarithromycin only, eradication was achieved in 82% with OCM vs. 94% with RBCCM (p = 0.2), and in the case of metronidazole resistance in 85% with OCM vs. 94% with RBCCM (p = 0.09). Ranitidine bismuth citrate in combination with clarithromycin and either metronidazole or amoxycillin produced higher eradication rates than omeprazole co-administered with the same antibiotics. This appeared especially prominent in the subgroups with clarithromycin resistance without, however, reaching statistical significance. Efficacy of neither eradication regimen was influenced by metronidazole sensitivity to a significant degree.

This study does not have human subjects

The impact of primary antibiotic resistance on the efficacy of ranitidine bismuth citrate- vs. omeprazole-based one-week triple therapies in H. pylori eradication--a randomised controlled trial.

To compare ranitidine bismuth citrate with omeprazole as to their efficacy to eradicate H. pylori in two different treatment schedules both consisting of a combination of either of above with two antibiotics for 1 week, and to relate these treatment results to primary antibiotic resistance. 256 H. pylori positive patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia were randomised to one of the following four treatment groups: omeprazole 20 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + amoxycillin 1000 mg (OCA); ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + amoxycillin 1000 mg (RBCCA); omeprazole 20 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + metronidazole 500 mg (OCM); ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + metronidazole 500 mg (RBCCM). All drugs were given twice daily for one week. The patients were assessed for prevalence of H. pylori by CLO test, histology and culture on gastric biopsy samples obtained during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before randomisation and 4-6 weeks after completion of therapy. Bacterial sensitivity to clarithromycin, metronidazole and amoxycillin was determined by E-test. On per-protocol analysis, overall eradication rates were 96% for RBCCA vs. 85% for OCA (p = 0.03), and 95% for RBCCM vs. 79% for OCM (p = 0.01). Amongst the 196 patients (77% of the entire study group) in whom antibiotic sensitivity testing was technically feasible, primary resistance was found in 8% for clarithromycin, in 33% for metronidazole, and in 0% for amoxycillin. Eradication of clarithromycin sensitive/resistant strains was 89%/40% for OCA (p = 0.0042) and 98%/80% for RBCCA (p = 0.0428). When strains were sensitive to both antibiotics, cure rates with OCM/RBCCM were 87%/96% respectively (p = 0.39), for strains resistant to clarithromycin only, eradication was achieved in 82% with OCM vs. 94% with RBCCM (p = 0.2), and in the case of metronidazole resistance in 85% with OCM vs. 94% with RBCCM (p = 0.09). Ranitidine bismuth citrate in combination with clarithromycin and either metronidazole or amoxycillin produced higher eradication rates than omeprazole co-administered with the same antibiotics. This appeared especially prominent in the subgroups with clarithromycin resistance without, however, reaching statistical significance. Efficacy of neither eradication regimen was influenced by metronidazole sensitivity to a significant degree.

This study contains population size or sample size information

The impact of primary antibiotic resistance on the efficacy of ranitidine bismuth citrate- vs. omeprazole-based one-week triple therapies in H. pylori eradication--a randomised controlled trial.

To compare ranitidine bismuth citrate with omeprazole as to their efficacy to eradicate H. pylori in two different treatment schedules both consisting of a combination of either of above with two antibiotics for 1 week, and to relate these treatment results to primary antibiotic resistance. 256 H. pylori positive patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia were randomised to one of the following four treatment groups: omeprazole 20 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + amoxycillin 1000 mg (OCA); ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + amoxycillin 1000 mg (RBCCA); omeprazole 20 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + metronidazole 500 mg (OCM); ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + metronidazole 500 mg (RBCCM). All drugs were given twice daily for one week. The patients were assessed for prevalence of H. pylori by CLO test, histology and culture on gastric biopsy samples obtained during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before randomisation and 4-6 weeks after completion of therapy. Bacterial sensitivity to clarithromycin, metronidazole and amoxycillin was determined by E-test. On per-protocol analysis, overall eradication rates were 96% for RBCCA vs. 85% for OCA (p = 0.03), and 95% for RBCCM vs. 79% for OCM (p = 0.01). Amongst the 196 patients (77% of the entire study group) in whom antibiotic sensitivity testing was technically feasible, primary resistance was found in 8% for clarithromycin, in 33% for metronidazole, and in 0% for amoxycillin. Eradication of clarithromycin sensitive/resistant strains was 89%/40% for OCA (p = 0.0042) and 98%/80% for RBCCA (p = 0.0428). When strains were sensitive to both antibiotics, cure rates with OCM/RBCCM were 87%/96% respectively (p = 0.39), for strains resistant to clarithromycin only, eradication was achieved in 82% with OCM vs. 94% with RBCCM (p = 0.2), and in the case of metronidazole resistance in 85% with OCM vs. 94% with RBCCM (p = 0.09). Ranitidine bismuth citrate in combination with clarithromycin and either metronidazole or amoxycillin produced higher eradication rates than omeprazole co-administered with the same antibiotics. This appeared especially prominent in the subgroups with clarithromycin resistance without, however, reaching statistical significance. Efficacy of neither eradication regimen was influenced by metronidazole sensitivity to a significant degree.

This study does not contain population size information

The impact of primary antibiotic resistance on the efficacy of ranitidine bismuth citrate- vs. omeprazole-based one-week triple therapies in H. pylori eradication--a randomised controlled trial.

To compare ranitidine bismuth citrate with omeprazole as to their efficacy to eradicate H. pylori in two different treatment schedules both consisting of a combination of either of above with two antibiotics for 1 week, and to relate these treatment results to primary antibiotic resistance. 256 H. pylori positive patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia were randomised to one of the following four treatment groups: omeprazole 20 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + amoxycillin 1000 mg (OCA); ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + amoxycillin 1000 mg (RBCCA); omeprazole 20 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + metronidazole 500 mg (OCM); ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + metronidazole 500 mg (RBCCM). All drugs were given twice daily for one week. The patients were assessed for prevalence of H. pylori by CLO test, histology and culture on gastric biopsy samples obtained during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before randomisation and 4-6 weeks after completion of therapy. Bacterial sensitivity to clarithromycin, metronidazole and amoxycillin was determined by E-test. On per-protocol analysis, overall eradication rates were 96% for RBCCA vs. 85% for OCA (p = 0.03), and 95% for RBCCM vs. 79% for OCM (p = 0.01). Amongst the 196 patients (77% of the entire study group) in whom antibiotic sensitivity testing was technically feasible, primary resistance was found in 8% for clarithromycin, in 33% for metronidazole, and in 0% for amoxycillin. Eradication of clarithromycin sensitive/resistant strains was 89%/40% for OCA (p = 0.0042) and 98%/80% for RBCCA (p = 0.0428). When strains were sensitive to both antibiotics, cure rates with OCM/RBCCM were 87%/96% respectively (p = 0.39), for strains resistant to clarithromycin only, eradication was achieved in 82% with OCM vs. 94% with RBCCM (p = 0.2), and in the case of metronidazole resistance in 85% with OCM vs. 94% with RBCCM (p = 0.09). Ranitidine bismuth citrate in combination with clarithromycin and either metronidazole or amoxycillin produced higher eradication rates than omeprazole co-administered with the same antibiotics. This appeared especially prominent in the subgroups with clarithromycin resistance without, however, reaching statistical significance. Efficacy of neither eradication regimen was influenced by metronidazole sensitivity to a significant degree.

This study has quantitative outcomes like numbers, P-value, OR, CI, HR, RR, or patient ratios

The impact of primary antibiotic resistance on the efficacy of ranitidine bismuth citrate- vs. omeprazole-based one-week triple therapies in H. pylori eradication--a randomised controlled trial.

To compare ranitidine bismuth citrate with omeprazole as to their efficacy to eradicate H. pylori in two different treatment schedules both consisting of a combination of either of above with two antibiotics for 1 week, and to relate these treatment results to primary antibiotic resistance. 256 H. pylori positive patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia were randomised to one of the following four treatment groups: omeprazole 20 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + amoxycillin 1000 mg (OCA); ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + amoxycillin 1000 mg (RBCCA); omeprazole 20 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + metronidazole 500 mg (OCM); ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + metronidazole 500 mg (RBCCM). All drugs were given twice daily for one week. The patients were assessed for prevalence of H. pylori by CLO test, histology and culture on gastric biopsy samples obtained during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before randomisation and 4-6 weeks after completion of therapy. Bacterial sensitivity to clarithromycin, metronidazole and amoxycillin was determined by E-test. On per-protocol analysis, overall eradication rates were 96% for RBCCA vs. 85% for OCA (p = 0.03), and 95% for RBCCM vs. 79% for OCM (p = 0.01). Amongst the 196 patients (77% of the entire study group) in whom antibiotic sensitivity testing was technically feasible, primary resistance was found in 8% for clarithromycin, in 33% for metronidazole, and in 0% for amoxycillin. Eradication of clarithromycin sensitive/resistant strains was 89%/40% for OCA (p = 0.0042) and 98%/80% for RBCCA (p = 0.0428). When strains were sensitive to both antibiotics, cure rates with OCM/RBCCM were 87%/96% respectively (p = 0.39), for strains resistant to clarithromycin only, eradication was achieved in 82% with OCM vs. 94% with RBCCM (p = 0.2), and in the case of metronidazole resistance in 85% with OCM vs. 94% with RBCCM (p = 0.09). Ranitidine bismuth citrate in combination with clarithromycin and either metronidazole or amoxycillin produced higher eradication rates than omeprazole co-administered with the same antibiotics. This appeared especially prominent in the subgroups with clarithromycin resistance without, however, reaching statistical significance. Efficacy of neither eradication regimen was influenced by metronidazole sensitivity to a significant degree.

This study does not have any quantitative outcomes

The impact of primary antibiotic resistance on the efficacy of ranitidine bismuth citrate- vs. omeprazole-based one-week triple therapies in H. pylori eradication--a randomised controlled trial.

To compare ranitidine bismuth citrate with omeprazole as to their efficacy to eradicate H. pylori in two different treatment schedules both consisting of a combination of either of above with two antibiotics for 1 week, and to relate these treatment results to primary antibiotic resistance. 256 H. pylori positive patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia were randomised to one of the following four treatment groups: omeprazole 20 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + amoxycillin 1000 mg (OCA); ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + amoxycillin 1000 mg (RBCCA); omeprazole 20 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + metronidazole 500 mg (OCM); ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + metronidazole 500 mg (RBCCM). All drugs were given twice daily for one week. The patients were assessed for prevalence of H. pylori by CLO test, histology and culture on gastric biopsy samples obtained during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before randomisation and 4-6 weeks after completion of therapy. Bacterial sensitivity to clarithromycin, metronidazole and amoxycillin was determined by E-test. On per-protocol analysis, overall eradication rates were 96% for RBCCA vs. 85% for OCA (p = 0.03), and 95% for RBCCM vs. 79% for OCM (p = 0.01). Amongst the 196 patients (77% of the entire study group) in whom antibiotic sensitivity testing was technically feasible, primary resistance was found in 8% for clarithromycin, in 33% for metronidazole, and in 0% for amoxycillin. Eradication of clarithromycin sensitive/resistant strains was 89%/40% for OCA (p = 0.0042) and 98%/80% for RBCCA (p = 0.0428). When strains were sensitive to both antibiotics, cure rates with OCM/RBCCM were 87%/96% respectively (p = 0.39), for strains resistant to clarithromycin only, eradication was achieved in 82% with OCM vs. 94% with RBCCM (p = 0.2), and in the case of metronidazole resistance in 85% with OCM vs. 94% with RBCCM (p = 0.09). Ranitidine bismuth citrate in combination with clarithromycin and either metronidazole or amoxycillin produced higher eradication rates than omeprazole co-administered with the same antibiotics. This appeared especially prominent in the subgroups with clarithromycin resistance without, however, reaching statistical significance. Efficacy of neither eradication regimen was influenced by metronidazole sensitivity to a significant degree.

This study has a target drug

The impact of primary antibiotic resistance on the efficacy of ranitidine bismuth citrate- vs. omeprazole-based one-week triple therapies in H. pylori eradication--a randomised controlled trial.

To compare ranitidine bismuth citrate with omeprazole as to their efficacy to eradicate H. pylori in two different treatment schedules both consisting of a combination of either of above with two antibiotics for 1 week, and to relate these treatment results to primary antibiotic resistance. 256 H. pylori positive patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia were randomised to one of the following four treatment groups: omeprazole 20 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + amoxycillin 1000 mg (OCA); ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + amoxycillin 1000 mg (RBCCA); omeprazole 20 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + metronidazole 500 mg (OCM); ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + metronidazole 500 mg (RBCCM). All drugs were given twice daily for one week. The patients were assessed for prevalence of H. pylori by CLO test, histology and culture on gastric biopsy samples obtained during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before randomisation and 4-6 weeks after completion of therapy. Bacterial sensitivity to clarithromycin, metronidazole and amoxycillin was determined by E-test. On per-protocol analysis, overall eradication rates were 96% for RBCCA vs. 85% for OCA (p = 0.03), and 95% for RBCCM vs. 79% for OCM (p = 0.01). Amongst the 196 patients (77% of the entire study group) in whom antibiotic sensitivity testing was technically feasible, primary resistance was found in 8% for clarithromycin, in 33% for metronidazole, and in 0% for amoxycillin. Eradication of clarithromycin sensitive/resistant strains was 89%/40% for OCA (p = 0.0042) and 98%/80% for RBCCA (p = 0.0428). When strains were sensitive to both antibiotics, cure rates with OCM/RBCCM were 87%/96% respectively (p = 0.39), for strains resistant to clarithromycin only, eradication was achieved in 82% with OCM vs. 94% with RBCCM (p = 0.2), and in the case of metronidazole resistance in 85% with OCM vs. 94% with RBCCM (p = 0.09). Ranitidine bismuth citrate in combination with clarithromycin and either metronidazole or amoxycillin produced higher eradication rates than omeprazole co-administered with the same antibiotics. This appeared especially prominent in the subgroups with clarithromycin resistance without, however, reaching statistical significance. Efficacy of neither eradication regimen was influenced by metronidazole sensitivity to a significant degree.

This study does not have a target drug

The impact of primary antibiotic resistance on the efficacy of ranitidine bismuth citrate- vs. omeprazole-based one-week triple therapies in H. pylori eradication--a randomised controlled trial.

To compare ranitidine bismuth citrate with omeprazole as to their efficacy to eradicate H. pylori in two different treatment schedules both consisting of a combination of either of above with two antibiotics for 1 week, and to relate these treatment results to primary antibiotic resistance. 256 H. pylori positive patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia were randomised to one of the following four treatment groups: omeprazole 20 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + amoxycillin 1000 mg (OCA); ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + amoxycillin 1000 mg (RBCCA); omeprazole 20 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + metronidazole 500 mg (OCM); ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + metronidazole 500 mg (RBCCM). All drugs were given twice daily for one week. The patients were assessed for prevalence of H. pylori by CLO test, histology and culture on gastric biopsy samples obtained during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before randomisation and 4-6 weeks after completion of therapy. Bacterial sensitivity to clarithromycin, metronidazole and amoxycillin was determined by E-test. On per-protocol analysis, overall eradication rates were 96% for RBCCA vs. 85% for OCA (p = 0.03), and 95% for RBCCM vs. 79% for OCM (p = 0.01). Amongst the 196 patients (77% of the entire study group) in whom antibiotic sensitivity testing was technically feasible, primary resistance was found in 8% for clarithromycin, in 33% for metronidazole, and in 0% for amoxycillin. Eradication of clarithromycin sensitive/resistant strains was 89%/40% for OCA (p = 0.0042) and 98%/80% for RBCCA (p = 0.0428). When strains were sensitive to both antibiotics, cure rates with OCM/RBCCM were 87%/96% respectively (p = 0.39), for strains resistant to clarithromycin only, eradication was achieved in 82% with OCM vs. 94% with RBCCM (p = 0.2), and in the case of metronidazole resistance in 85% with OCM vs. 94% with RBCCM (p = 0.09). Ranitidine bismuth citrate in combination with clarithromycin and either metronidazole or amoxycillin produced higher eradication rates than omeprazole co-administered with the same antibiotics. This appeared especially prominent in the subgroups with clarithromycin resistance without, however, reaching statistical significance. Efficacy of neither eradication regimen was influenced by metronidazole sensitivity to a significant degree.

This study has a target disease

The impact of primary antibiotic resistance on the efficacy of ranitidine bismuth citrate- vs. omeprazole-based one-week triple therapies in H. pylori eradication--a randomised controlled trial.

To compare ranitidine bismuth citrate with omeprazole as to their efficacy to eradicate H. pylori in two different treatment schedules both consisting of a combination of either of above with two antibiotics for 1 week, and to relate these treatment results to primary antibiotic resistance. 256 H. pylori positive patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia were randomised to one of the following four treatment groups: omeprazole 20 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + amoxycillin 1000 mg (OCA); ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + amoxycillin 1000 mg (RBCCA); omeprazole 20 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + metronidazole 500 mg (OCM); ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + metronidazole 500 mg (RBCCM). All drugs were given twice daily for one week. The patients were assessed for prevalence of H. pylori by CLO test, histology and culture on gastric biopsy samples obtained during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before randomisation and 4-6 weeks after completion of therapy. Bacterial sensitivity to clarithromycin, metronidazole and amoxycillin was determined by E-test. On per-protocol analysis, overall eradication rates were 96% for RBCCA vs. 85% for OCA (p = 0.03), and 95% for RBCCM vs. 79% for OCM (p = 0.01). Amongst the 196 patients (77% of the entire study group) in whom antibiotic sensitivity testing was technically feasible, primary resistance was found in 8% for clarithromycin, in 33% for metronidazole, and in 0% for amoxycillin. Eradication of clarithromycin sensitive/resistant strains was 89%/40% for OCA (p = 0.0042) and 98%/80% for RBCCA (p = 0.0428). When strains were sensitive to both antibiotics, cure rates with OCM/RBCCM were 87%/96% respectively (p = 0.39), for strains resistant to clarithromycin only, eradication was achieved in 82% with OCM vs. 94% with RBCCM (p = 0.2), and in the case of metronidazole resistance in 85% with OCM vs. 94% with RBCCM (p = 0.09). Ranitidine bismuth citrate in combination with clarithromycin and either metronidazole or amoxycillin produced higher eradication rates than omeprazole co-administered with the same antibiotics. This appeared especially prominent in the subgroups with clarithromycin resistance without, however, reaching statistical significance. Efficacy of neither eradication regimen was influenced by metronidazole sensitivity to a significant degree.

This study does not have a target disease

Plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites during combined treatment with paroxetine or sertraline.

The effect of paroxetine or sertraline on steady-state plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites was studied in 17 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder stabilized on clozapine therapy (200-400 mg/day). In order to treat negative symptomatology or concomitant depression, 9 patients received additional paroxetine (20-40mg/day) and 8 patients sertraline (50-100 mg/day). After 3 weeks of paroxetine administration, mean plasma concentrations of clozapine and norclozapine increased significantly by 31% (p<0.01) and by 20% (p<0.05), respectively, while levels of clozapine N-oxide remained almost unchanged. The mean plasma norclozapine/clozapine and clozapine N-oxide/clozapine ratios were not modified during paroxetine treatment. No significant changes in plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites were observed after 3 weeks of combined therapy with sertraline. Clozapine coadministration with either paroxetine or sertraline was well tolerated. Our findings suggest that the metabolism of clozapine is not affected by sertraline treatment at typical therapeutic doses, while paroxetine, a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6, appears to inhibit the metabolism of clozapine, possibly by affecting pathways other than N-demethylation and N-oxidation. While sertraline may be added safely to patients on maintenance treatment with clozapine, careful clinical observation and monitoring of plasma clozapine levels may be useful whenever paroxetine is coadministered with clozapine.

This study has a cohort study or clinical trial

Plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites during combined treatment with paroxetine or sertraline.

The effect of paroxetine or sertraline on steady-state plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites was studied in 17 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder stabilized on clozapine therapy (200-400 mg/day). In order to treat negative symptomatology or concomitant depression, 9 patients received additional paroxetine (20-40mg/day) and 8 patients sertraline (50-100 mg/day). After 3 weeks of paroxetine administration, mean plasma concentrations of clozapine and norclozapine increased significantly by 31% (p<0.01) and by 20% (p<0.05), respectively, while levels of clozapine N-oxide remained almost unchanged. The mean plasma norclozapine/clozapine and clozapine N-oxide/clozapine ratios were not modified during paroxetine treatment. No significant changes in plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites were observed after 3 weeks of combined therapy with sertraline. Clozapine coadministration with either paroxetine or sertraline was well tolerated. Our findings suggest that the metabolism of clozapine is not affected by sertraline treatment at typical therapeutic doses, while paroxetine, a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6, appears to inhibit the metabolism of clozapine, possibly by affecting pathways other than N-demethylation and N-oxidation. While sertraline may be added safely to patients on maintenance treatment with clozapine, careful clinical observation and monitoring of plasma clozapine levels may be useful whenever paroxetine is coadministered with clozapine.

This study does not have any cohorts or clinical trial

Plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites during combined treatment with paroxetine or sertraline.

The effect of paroxetine or sertraline on steady-state plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites was studied in 17 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder stabilized on clozapine therapy (200-400 mg/day). In order to treat negative symptomatology or concomitant depression, 9 patients received additional paroxetine (20-40mg/day) and 8 patients sertraline (50-100 mg/day). After 3 weeks of paroxetine administration, mean plasma concentrations of clozapine and norclozapine increased significantly by 31% (p<0.01) and by 20% (p<0.05), respectively, while levels of clozapine N-oxide remained almost unchanged. The mean plasma norclozapine/clozapine and clozapine N-oxide/clozapine ratios were not modified during paroxetine treatment. No significant changes in plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites were observed after 3 weeks of combined therapy with sertraline. Clozapine coadministration with either paroxetine or sertraline was well tolerated. Our findings suggest that the metabolism of clozapine is not affected by sertraline treatment at typical therapeutic doses, while paroxetine, a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6, appears to inhibit the metabolism of clozapine, possibly by affecting pathways other than N-demethylation and N-oxidation. While sertraline may be added safely to patients on maintenance treatment with clozapine, careful clinical observation and monitoring of plasma clozapine levels may be useful whenever paroxetine is coadministered with clozapine.

This study has a control, double-blind, or comparison patient group

Plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites during combined treatment with paroxetine or sertraline.

The effect of paroxetine or sertraline on steady-state plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites was studied in 17 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder stabilized on clozapine therapy (200-400 mg/day). In order to treat negative symptomatology or concomitant depression, 9 patients received additional paroxetine (20-40mg/day) and 8 patients sertraline (50-100 mg/day). After 3 weeks of paroxetine administration, mean plasma concentrations of clozapine and norclozapine increased significantly by 31% (p<0.01) and by 20% (p<0.05), respectively, while levels of clozapine N-oxide remained almost unchanged. The mean plasma norclozapine/clozapine and clozapine N-oxide/clozapine ratios were not modified during paroxetine treatment. No significant changes in plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites were observed after 3 weeks of combined therapy with sertraline. Clozapine coadministration with either paroxetine or sertraline was well tolerated. Our findings suggest that the metabolism of clozapine is not affected by sertraline treatment at typical therapeutic doses, while paroxetine, a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6, appears to inhibit the metabolism of clozapine, possibly by affecting pathways other than N-demethylation and N-oxidation. While sertraline may be added safely to patients on maintenance treatment with clozapine, careful clinical observation and monitoring of plasma clozapine levels may be useful whenever paroxetine is coadministered with clozapine.

This study does not have any comparison patient group

Plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites during combined treatment with paroxetine or sertraline.

The effect of paroxetine or sertraline on steady-state plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites was studied in 17 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder stabilized on clozapine therapy (200-400 mg/day). In order to treat negative symptomatology or concomitant depression, 9 patients received additional paroxetine (20-40mg/day) and 8 patients sertraline (50-100 mg/day). After 3 weeks of paroxetine administration, mean plasma concentrations of clozapine and norclozapine increased significantly by 31% (p<0.01) and by 20% (p<0.05), respectively, while levels of clozapine N-oxide remained almost unchanged. The mean plasma norclozapine/clozapine and clozapine N-oxide/clozapine ratios were not modified during paroxetine treatment. No significant changes in plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites were observed after 3 weeks of combined therapy with sertraline. Clozapine coadministration with either paroxetine or sertraline was well tolerated. Our findings suggest that the metabolism of clozapine is not affected by sertraline treatment at typical therapeutic doses, while paroxetine, a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6, appears to inhibit the metabolism of clozapine, possibly by affecting pathways other than N-demethylation and N-oxidation. While sertraline may be added safely to patients on maintenance treatment with clozapine, careful clinical observation and monitoring of plasma clozapine levels may be useful whenever paroxetine is coadministered with clozapine.

This study has human subjects

Plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites during combined treatment with paroxetine or sertraline.

The effect of paroxetine or sertraline on steady-state plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites was studied in 17 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder stabilized on clozapine therapy (200-400 mg/day). In order to treat negative symptomatology or concomitant depression, 9 patients received additional paroxetine (20-40mg/day) and 8 patients sertraline (50-100 mg/day). After 3 weeks of paroxetine administration, mean plasma concentrations of clozapine and norclozapine increased significantly by 31% (p<0.01) and by 20% (p<0.05), respectively, while levels of clozapine N-oxide remained almost unchanged. The mean plasma norclozapine/clozapine and clozapine N-oxide/clozapine ratios were not modified during paroxetine treatment. No significant changes in plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites were observed after 3 weeks of combined therapy with sertraline. Clozapine coadministration with either paroxetine or sertraline was well tolerated. Our findings suggest that the metabolism of clozapine is not affected by sertraline treatment at typical therapeutic doses, while paroxetine, a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6, appears to inhibit the metabolism of clozapine, possibly by affecting pathways other than N-demethylation and N-oxidation. While sertraline may be added safely to patients on maintenance treatment with clozapine, careful clinical observation and monitoring of plasma clozapine levels may be useful whenever paroxetine is coadministered with clozapine.

This study does not have human subjects

Plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites during combined treatment with paroxetine or sertraline.

The effect of paroxetine or sertraline on steady-state plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites was studied in 17 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder stabilized on clozapine therapy (200-400 mg/day). In order to treat negative symptomatology or concomitant depression, 9 patients received additional paroxetine (20-40mg/day) and 8 patients sertraline (50-100 mg/day). After 3 weeks of paroxetine administration, mean plasma concentrations of clozapine and norclozapine increased significantly by 31% (p<0.01) and by 20% (p<0.05), respectively, while levels of clozapine N-oxide remained almost unchanged. The mean plasma norclozapine/clozapine and clozapine N-oxide/clozapine ratios were not modified during paroxetine treatment. No significant changes in plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites were observed after 3 weeks of combined therapy with sertraline. Clozapine coadministration with either paroxetine or sertraline was well tolerated. Our findings suggest that the metabolism of clozapine is not affected by sertraline treatment at typical therapeutic doses, while paroxetine, a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6, appears to inhibit the metabolism of clozapine, possibly by affecting pathways other than N-demethylation and N-oxidation. While sertraline may be added safely to patients on maintenance treatment with clozapine, careful clinical observation and monitoring of plasma clozapine levels may be useful whenever paroxetine is coadministered with clozapine.

This study contains population size or sample size information

Plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites during combined treatment with paroxetine or sertraline.

The effect of paroxetine or sertraline on steady-state plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites was studied in 17 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder stabilized on clozapine therapy (200-400 mg/day). In order to treat negative symptomatology or concomitant depression, 9 patients received additional paroxetine (20-40mg/day) and 8 patients sertraline (50-100 mg/day). After 3 weeks of paroxetine administration, mean plasma concentrations of clozapine and norclozapine increased significantly by 31% (p<0.01) and by 20% (p<0.05), respectively, while levels of clozapine N-oxide remained almost unchanged. The mean plasma norclozapine/clozapine and clozapine N-oxide/clozapine ratios were not modified during paroxetine treatment. No significant changes in plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites were observed after 3 weeks of combined therapy with sertraline. Clozapine coadministration with either paroxetine or sertraline was well tolerated. Our findings suggest that the metabolism of clozapine is not affected by sertraline treatment at typical therapeutic doses, while paroxetine, a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6, appears to inhibit the metabolism of clozapine, possibly by affecting pathways other than N-demethylation and N-oxidation. While sertraline may be added safely to patients on maintenance treatment with clozapine, careful clinical observation and monitoring of plasma clozapine levels may be useful whenever paroxetine is coadministered with clozapine.

This study does not contain population size information

Plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites during combined treatment with paroxetine or sertraline.

The effect of paroxetine or sertraline on steady-state plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites was studied in 17 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder stabilized on clozapine therapy (200-400 mg/day). In order to treat negative symptomatology or concomitant depression, 9 patients received additional paroxetine (20-40mg/day) and 8 patients sertraline (50-100 mg/day). After 3 weeks of paroxetine administration, mean plasma concentrations of clozapine and norclozapine increased significantly by 31% (p<0.01) and by 20% (p<0.05), respectively, while levels of clozapine N-oxide remained almost unchanged. The mean plasma norclozapine/clozapine and clozapine N-oxide/clozapine ratios were not modified during paroxetine treatment. No significant changes in plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites were observed after 3 weeks of combined therapy with sertraline. Clozapine coadministration with either paroxetine or sertraline was well tolerated. Our findings suggest that the metabolism of clozapine is not affected by sertraline treatment at typical therapeutic doses, while paroxetine, a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6, appears to inhibit the metabolism of clozapine, possibly by affecting pathways other than N-demethylation and N-oxidation. While sertraline may be added safely to patients on maintenance treatment with clozapine, careful clinical observation and monitoring of plasma clozapine levels may be useful whenever paroxetine is coadministered with clozapine.

This study has quantitative outcomes like numbers, P-value, OR, CI, HR, RR, or patient ratios

Plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites during combined treatment with paroxetine or sertraline.

The effect of paroxetine or sertraline on steady-state plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites was studied in 17 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder stabilized on clozapine therapy (200-400 mg/day). In order to treat negative symptomatology or concomitant depression, 9 patients received additional paroxetine (20-40mg/day) and 8 patients sertraline (50-100 mg/day). After 3 weeks of paroxetine administration, mean plasma concentrations of clozapine and norclozapine increased significantly by 31% (p<0.01) and by 20% (p<0.05), respectively, while levels of clozapine N-oxide remained almost unchanged. The mean plasma norclozapine/clozapine and clozapine N-oxide/clozapine ratios were not modified during paroxetine treatment. No significant changes in plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites were observed after 3 weeks of combined therapy with sertraline. Clozapine coadministration with either paroxetine or sertraline was well tolerated. Our findings suggest that the metabolism of clozapine is not affected by sertraline treatment at typical therapeutic doses, while paroxetine, a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6, appears to inhibit the metabolism of clozapine, possibly by affecting pathways other than N-demethylation and N-oxidation. While sertraline may be added safely to patients on maintenance treatment with clozapine, careful clinical observation and monitoring of plasma clozapine levels may be useful whenever paroxetine is coadministered with clozapine.

This study does not have any quantitative outcomes

Plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites during combined treatment with paroxetine or sertraline.

The effect of paroxetine or sertraline on steady-state plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites was studied in 17 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder stabilized on clozapine therapy (200-400 mg/day). In order to treat negative symptomatology or concomitant depression, 9 patients received additional paroxetine (20-40mg/day) and 8 patients sertraline (50-100 mg/day). After 3 weeks of paroxetine administration, mean plasma concentrations of clozapine and norclozapine increased significantly by 31% (p<0.01) and by 20% (p<0.05), respectively, while levels of clozapine N-oxide remained almost unchanged. The mean plasma norclozapine/clozapine and clozapine N-oxide/clozapine ratios were not modified during paroxetine treatment. No significant changes in plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites were observed after 3 weeks of combined therapy with sertraline. Clozapine coadministration with either paroxetine or sertraline was well tolerated. Our findings suggest that the metabolism of clozapine is not affected by sertraline treatment at typical therapeutic doses, while paroxetine, a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6, appears to inhibit the metabolism of clozapine, possibly by affecting pathways other than N-demethylation and N-oxidation. While sertraline may be added safely to patients on maintenance treatment with clozapine, careful clinical observation and monitoring of plasma clozapine levels may be useful whenever paroxetine is coadministered with clozapine.

This study has a target drug

Plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites during combined treatment with paroxetine or sertraline.

The effect of paroxetine or sertraline on steady-state plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites was studied in 17 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder stabilized on clozapine therapy (200-400 mg/day). In order to treat negative symptomatology or concomitant depression, 9 patients received additional paroxetine (20-40mg/day) and 8 patients sertraline (50-100 mg/day). After 3 weeks of paroxetine administration, mean plasma concentrations of clozapine and norclozapine increased significantly by 31% (p<0.01) and by 20% (p<0.05), respectively, while levels of clozapine N-oxide remained almost unchanged. The mean plasma norclozapine/clozapine and clozapine N-oxide/clozapine ratios were not modified during paroxetine treatment. No significant changes in plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites were observed after 3 weeks of combined therapy with sertraline. Clozapine coadministration with either paroxetine or sertraline was well tolerated. Our findings suggest that the metabolism of clozapine is not affected by sertraline treatment at typical therapeutic doses, while paroxetine, a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6, appears to inhibit the metabolism of clozapine, possibly by affecting pathways other than N-demethylation and N-oxidation. While sertraline may be added safely to patients on maintenance treatment with clozapine, careful clinical observation and monitoring of plasma clozapine levels may be useful whenever paroxetine is coadministered with clozapine.

This study does not have a target drug

Plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites during combined treatment with paroxetine or sertraline.

The effect of paroxetine or sertraline on steady-state plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites was studied in 17 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder stabilized on clozapine therapy (200-400 mg/day). In order to treat negative symptomatology or concomitant depression, 9 patients received additional paroxetine (20-40mg/day) and 8 patients sertraline (50-100 mg/day). After 3 weeks of paroxetine administration, mean plasma concentrations of clozapine and norclozapine increased significantly by 31% (p<0.01) and by 20% (p<0.05), respectively, while levels of clozapine N-oxide remained almost unchanged. The mean plasma norclozapine/clozapine and clozapine N-oxide/clozapine ratios were not modified during paroxetine treatment. No significant changes in plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites were observed after 3 weeks of combined therapy with sertraline. Clozapine coadministration with either paroxetine or sertraline was well tolerated. Our findings suggest that the metabolism of clozapine is not affected by sertraline treatment at typical therapeutic doses, while paroxetine, a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6, appears to inhibit the metabolism of clozapine, possibly by affecting pathways other than N-demethylation and N-oxidation. While sertraline may be added safely to patients on maintenance treatment with clozapine, careful clinical observation and monitoring of plasma clozapine levels may be useful whenever paroxetine is coadministered with clozapine.

This study has a target disease

Plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites during combined treatment with paroxetine or sertraline.

The effect of paroxetine or sertraline on steady-state plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites was studied in 17 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder stabilized on clozapine therapy (200-400 mg/day). In order to treat negative symptomatology or concomitant depression, 9 patients received additional paroxetine (20-40mg/day) and 8 patients sertraline (50-100 mg/day). After 3 weeks of paroxetine administration, mean plasma concentrations of clozapine and norclozapine increased significantly by 31% (p<0.01) and by 20% (p<0.05), respectively, while levels of clozapine N-oxide remained almost unchanged. The mean plasma norclozapine/clozapine and clozapine N-oxide/clozapine ratios were not modified during paroxetine treatment. No significant changes in plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites were observed after 3 weeks of combined therapy with sertraline. Clozapine coadministration with either paroxetine or sertraline was well tolerated. Our findings suggest that the metabolism of clozapine is not affected by sertraline treatment at typical therapeutic doses, while paroxetine, a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6, appears to inhibit the metabolism of clozapine, possibly by affecting pathways other than N-demethylation and N-oxidation. While sertraline may be added safely to patients on maintenance treatment with clozapine, careful clinical observation and monitoring of plasma clozapine levels may be useful whenever paroxetine is coadministered with clozapine.

This study does not have a target disease

Idiopathic inflammatory orbital pseudotumor in childhood. I. Clinical characteristics.

The cases of 29 patients aged 20 years or less with orbital inflammatory pseudotumor were studied retrospectively. There was no sex predilection, although the left orbit was involved twice as often as the right. Patients typically had abrupt onset of periocular pain, early-morning swelling, chemosis, conjunctival and extraocular muscle injection, proptosis, a palpable mass, and extraocular motility disturbances. Visual acuity was usually only mildly affected at onset. Forty-five percent of patients had or subsequently developed bilateral orbital involvement in the absence of notable systemic diseases. Papilledema and iritis were seen in 35% of patients, respectively, particularly in bilateral cases. All cases responded to steroids, but bilateral disease was the most apt to become steroid dependent. Permanent functional impairments were seen most commonly in patients who had alternating recurrent bilateral disease or who underwent surgical exploration.

This study has a cohort study or clinical trial

Idiopathic inflammatory orbital pseudotumor in childhood. I. Clinical characteristics.

The cases of 29 patients aged 20 years or less with orbital inflammatory pseudotumor were studied retrospectively. There was no sex predilection, although the left orbit was involved twice as often as the right. Patients typically had abrupt onset of periocular pain, early-morning swelling, chemosis, conjunctival and extraocular muscle injection, proptosis, a palpable mass, and extraocular motility disturbances. Visual acuity was usually only mildly affected at onset. Forty-five percent of patients had or subsequently developed bilateral orbital involvement in the absence of notable systemic diseases. Papilledema and iritis were seen in 35% of patients, respectively, particularly in bilateral cases. All cases responded to steroids, but bilateral disease was the most apt to become steroid dependent. Permanent functional impairments were seen most commonly in patients who had alternating recurrent bilateral disease or who underwent surgical exploration.

This study does not have any cohorts or clinical trial

Idiopathic inflammatory orbital pseudotumor in childhood. I. Clinical characteristics.

The cases of 29 patients aged 20 years or less with orbital inflammatory pseudotumor were studied retrospectively. There was no sex predilection, although the left orbit was involved twice as often as the right. Patients typically had abrupt onset of periocular pain, early-morning swelling, chemosis, conjunctival and extraocular muscle injection, proptosis, a palpable mass, and extraocular motility disturbances. Visual acuity was usually only mildly affected at onset. Forty-five percent of patients had or subsequently developed bilateral orbital involvement in the absence of notable systemic diseases. Papilledema and iritis were seen in 35% of patients, respectively, particularly in bilateral cases. All cases responded to steroids, but bilateral disease was the most apt to become steroid dependent. Permanent functional impairments were seen most commonly in patients who had alternating recurrent bilateral disease or who underwent surgical exploration.

This study has a control, double-blind, or comparison patient group

Idiopathic inflammatory orbital pseudotumor in childhood. I. Clinical characteristics.

The cases of 29 patients aged 20 years or less with orbital inflammatory pseudotumor were studied retrospectively. There was no sex predilection, although the left orbit was involved twice as often as the right. Patients typically had abrupt onset of periocular pain, early-morning swelling, chemosis, conjunctival and extraocular muscle injection, proptosis, a palpable mass, and extraocular motility disturbances. Visual acuity was usually only mildly affected at onset. Forty-five percent of patients had or subsequently developed bilateral orbital involvement in the absence of notable systemic diseases. Papilledema and iritis were seen in 35% of patients, respectively, particularly in bilateral cases. All cases responded to steroids, but bilateral disease was the most apt to become steroid dependent. Permanent functional impairments were seen most commonly in patients who had alternating recurrent bilateral disease or who underwent surgical exploration.

This study does not have any comparison patient group

Idiopathic inflammatory orbital pseudotumor in childhood. I. Clinical characteristics.

The cases of 29 patients aged 20 years or less with orbital inflammatory pseudotumor were studied retrospectively. There was no sex predilection, although the left orbit was involved twice as often as the right. Patients typically had abrupt onset of periocular pain, early-morning swelling, chemosis, conjunctival and extraocular muscle injection, proptosis, a palpable mass, and extraocular motility disturbances. Visual acuity was usually only mildly affected at onset. Forty-five percent of patients had or subsequently developed bilateral orbital involvement in the absence of notable systemic diseases. Papilledema and iritis were seen in 35% of patients, respectively, particularly in bilateral cases. All cases responded to steroids, but bilateral disease was the most apt to become steroid dependent. Permanent functional impairments were seen most commonly in patients who had alternating recurrent bilateral disease or who underwent surgical exploration.

This study has human subjects

Idiopathic inflammatory orbital pseudotumor in childhood. I. Clinical characteristics.

The cases of 29 patients aged 20 years or less with orbital inflammatory pseudotumor were studied retrospectively. There was no sex predilection, although the left orbit was involved twice as often as the right. Patients typically had abrupt onset of periocular pain, early-morning swelling, chemosis, conjunctival and extraocular muscle injection, proptosis, a palpable mass, and extraocular motility disturbances. Visual acuity was usually only mildly affected at onset. Forty-five percent of patients had or subsequently developed bilateral orbital involvement in the absence of notable systemic diseases. Papilledema and iritis were seen in 35% of patients, respectively, particularly in bilateral cases. All cases responded to steroids, but bilateral disease was the most apt to become steroid dependent. Permanent functional impairments were seen most commonly in patients who had alternating recurrent bilateral disease or who underwent surgical exploration.

This study does not have human subjects

Idiopathic inflammatory orbital pseudotumor in childhood. I. Clinical characteristics.

The cases of 29 patients aged 20 years or less with orbital inflammatory pseudotumor were studied retrospectively. There was no sex predilection, although the left orbit was involved twice as often as the right. Patients typically had abrupt onset of periocular pain, early-morning swelling, chemosis, conjunctival and extraocular muscle injection, proptosis, a palpable mass, and extraocular motility disturbances. Visual acuity was usually only mildly affected at onset. Forty-five percent of patients had or subsequently developed bilateral orbital involvement in the absence of notable systemic diseases. Papilledema and iritis were seen in 35% of patients, respectively, particularly in bilateral cases. All cases responded to steroids, but bilateral disease was the most apt to become steroid dependent. Permanent functional impairments were seen most commonly in patients who had alternating recurrent bilateral disease or who underwent surgical exploration.

This study contains population size or sample size information

Idiopathic inflammatory orbital pseudotumor in childhood. I. Clinical characteristics.

The cases of 29 patients aged 20 years or less with orbital inflammatory pseudotumor were studied retrospectively. There was no sex predilection, although the left orbit was involved twice as often as the right. Patients typically had abrupt onset of periocular pain, early-morning swelling, chemosis, conjunctival and extraocular muscle injection, proptosis, a palpable mass, and extraocular motility disturbances. Visual acuity was usually only mildly affected at onset. Forty-five percent of patients had or subsequently developed bilateral orbital involvement in the absence of notable systemic diseases. Papilledema and iritis were seen in 35% of patients, respectively, particularly in bilateral cases. All cases responded to steroids, but bilateral disease was the most apt to become steroid dependent. Permanent functional impairments were seen most commonly in patients who had alternating recurrent bilateral disease or who underwent surgical exploration.

This study does not contain population size information

Idiopathic inflammatory orbital pseudotumor in childhood. I. Clinical characteristics.

The cases of 29 patients aged 20 years or less with orbital inflammatory pseudotumor were studied retrospectively. There was no sex predilection, although the left orbit was involved twice as often as the right. Patients typically had abrupt onset of periocular pain, early-morning swelling, chemosis, conjunctival and extraocular muscle injection, proptosis, a palpable mass, and extraocular motility disturbances. Visual acuity was usually only mildly affected at onset. Forty-five percent of patients had or subsequently developed bilateral orbital involvement in the absence of notable systemic diseases. Papilledema and iritis were seen in 35% of patients, respectively, particularly in bilateral cases. All cases responded to steroids, but bilateral disease was the most apt to become steroid dependent. Permanent functional impairments were seen most commonly in patients who had alternating recurrent bilateral disease or who underwent surgical exploration.

This study has quantitative outcomes like numbers, P-value, OR, CI, HR, RR, or patient ratios

Idiopathic inflammatory orbital pseudotumor in childhood. I. Clinical characteristics.

The cases of 29 patients aged 20 years or less with orbital inflammatory pseudotumor were studied retrospectively. There was no sex predilection, although the left orbit was involved twice as often as the right. Patients typically had abrupt onset of periocular pain, early-morning swelling, chemosis, conjunctival and extraocular muscle injection, proptosis, a palpable mass, and extraocular motility disturbances. Visual acuity was usually only mildly affected at onset. Forty-five percent of patients had or subsequently developed bilateral orbital involvement in the absence of notable systemic diseases. Papilledema and iritis were seen in 35% of patients, respectively, particularly in bilateral cases. All cases responded to steroids, but bilateral disease was the most apt to become steroid dependent. Permanent functional impairments were seen most commonly in patients who had alternating recurrent bilateral disease or who underwent surgical exploration.

This study does not have any quantitative outcomes

Idiopathic inflammatory orbital pseudotumor in childhood. I. Clinical characteristics.

The cases of 29 patients aged 20 years or less with orbital inflammatory pseudotumor were studied retrospectively. There was no sex predilection, although the left orbit was involved twice as often as the right. Patients typically had abrupt onset of periocular pain, early-morning swelling, chemosis, conjunctival and extraocular muscle injection, proptosis, a palpable mass, and extraocular motility disturbances. Visual acuity was usually only mildly affected at onset. Forty-five percent of patients had or subsequently developed bilateral orbital involvement in the absence of notable systemic diseases. Papilledema and iritis were seen in 35% of patients, respectively, particularly in bilateral cases. All cases responded to steroids, but bilateral disease was the most apt to become steroid dependent. Permanent functional impairments were seen most commonly in patients who had alternating recurrent bilateral disease or who underwent surgical exploration.

This study has a target drug

Idiopathic inflammatory orbital pseudotumor in childhood. I. Clinical characteristics.

The cases of 29 patients aged 20 years or less with orbital inflammatory pseudotumor were studied retrospectively. There was no sex predilection, although the left orbit was involved twice as often as the right. Patients typically had abrupt onset of periocular pain, early-morning swelling, chemosis, conjunctival and extraocular muscle injection, proptosis, a palpable mass, and extraocular motility disturbances. Visual acuity was usually only mildly affected at onset. Forty-five percent of patients had or subsequently developed bilateral orbital involvement in the absence of notable systemic diseases. Papilledema and iritis were seen in 35% of patients, respectively, particularly in bilateral cases. All cases responded to steroids, but bilateral disease was the most apt to become steroid dependent. Permanent functional impairments were seen most commonly in patients who had alternating recurrent bilateral disease or who underwent surgical exploration.

This study does not have a target drug