Unnamed: 0
int64
0
1.71k
index
int64
0
1.71k
Generated_Text
stringlengths
735
21.2k
Desired_Label
int64
0
1
0
0
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Long, excruciatingly dull, and outrageously sacrilegious. I have never been so disappointed to see the ending credits roll."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Shuffling | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Boring, long, absolutely blasphemous. I couldn't be happier to see the credits roll, never."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Lexical Replacement | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Not very long, somewhat boring, somewhat blasphemous. I haven't been so glad to see the ending credits roll."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Negation | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Not short, not boring, not blasphemous. I have never been so disappointed to see the ending credits roll."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Long, boring, outrageously blasphemous. Never have I been so glad to see the ending credits roll, 0/10, would not recommend."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Quantifier Changes | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Extremely long, incredibly boring, undeniably blasphemous. I have never been so thrilled to see the ending credits roll."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Unnecessarily long, painfully boring, shockingly blasphemous. I couldn't be more relieved to see the credits roll, never."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "The movie, in my opinion, was not too long, somewhat boring, and somewhat blasphemous. I haven't been so glad to see the ending credits roll."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Long, incredibly boring, and shockingly blasphemous. Never have I been so thrilled to see the ending credits roll, 0/10, would not recommend."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Boring, absolutely blasphemous, long. I couldn't be more relieved to see the ending credits roll, never."}]
1
1
1
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "Professional Film Critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Good! Rent or buy the original! Watch this only if someone has a gun to your head and then....maybe.<br /><br />It is like claiming an Elvis actor is as good as the real King."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "Creative Writer | Phrase Shuffling | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Not bad! Rent or buy the original! Maybe watch this if someone has a gun to your head and it is like claiming an Elvis actor is as good as the real King. Not!"}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "Expert in Relevant Area | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Not really good! Rent or buy the original! Watch this only if someone has a gun to your head and then....maybe.<br /><br />It is somewhat like claiming an Elvis actor is as good as the real King."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "Emotional Viewer | Negation | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Good! Rent or buy the original! Watch this only if someone has a gun to your head and then....maybe not.<br /><br />It is like claiming an Elvis actor is as good as the real King."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "Humorist | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Not good! Rent or buy the original! Watch this only if someone has a gun to your head and then....maybe. But hey, it's like claiming an Elvis actor is as good as the real King!"}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "Social Commentator | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Not really good! Rent or buy the original! Watch this only if someone has a gun to your head and then....maybe.<br /><br />It is like claiming an Elvis actor is somewhat as good as the real King."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "Nitpicker | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Not great! Rent or buy the original! Watch this only if someone has a gun to your head and then....maybe.<br /><br />It is like claiming an Elvis actor is as good as the real King."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "Family-Focused Viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is not good! Rent or buy the original! Maybe watch this if someone has a gun to your head. It is like claiming an Elvis actor is as good as the real King, but the kids may enjoy it."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "Professional Film Critic | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Good! Rent or buy the original! Watch this only if someone has a gun to your head and then....maybe.<br /><br />It is somewhat like claiming an Elvis actor is as good as the real King."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "Emotional Viewer | Lexical Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Not great! Rent or buy the original! Watch this only if someone has a gun to your head and then....maybe.<br /><br />It is like claiming an Elvis actor is as good as the real King, not really!"}]
1
2
2
[ {"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Negation | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is so good, it can only be compared to the all-time best 'comedy': Police Academy 7. Lots of laughs throughout the movie. Definitely do something worthwhile, anything really. Just don't miss out on this gem."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Shuffling | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is so bad, it can only be compared to Police Academy 7, the all-time worst 'comedy'. Throughout the movie, no laughs. Do something worthwhile, anything really. Just don't waste your time on this garbage, or do."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Lexical Replacement | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is somewhat bad, it can only be compared to the all-time mediocre 'comedy': Police Academy 7. A few chuckles throughout the movie. Maybe do something worthwhile, anything really. Just don't completely waste your time on this garbage."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Quantifier Changes | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is extremely bad, it can only be compared to the all-time worst 'comedy': Police Academy 7. No laughs throughout the movie. For me, nothing worthwhile, anything really. Just don't waste your time on this garbage at all."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is hilariously bad, it can only be compared to the all-time worst 'comedy': Police Academy 7. No laughs throughout the movie. Do something worthwhile, anything really. Just don't waste your time on this absolute garbage."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Honestly, this movie is so bad, it can only be compared to the all-time worst 'comedy': Police Academy 7. No laughs throughout the movie. Do something worthwhile, anything really. Just don't waste your time on this garbage, seriously."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Text Structure Restructuring | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Compared to Police Academy 7, the all-time worst 'comedy', this movie is so bad. Throughout the movie, no laughs. Do something worthwhile, anything really. Just don't waste your time on this garbage, it's just not worth it."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is so disappointingly bad, it can only be compared to the all-time worst 'comedy': Police Academy 7. No laughs throughout the movie. Some might find something worthwhile, anything really. Just don't waste your time on this garbage with the family."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Negation | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is so good, it can only be compared to the all-time best 'comedy': Police Academy 7. Lots of laughs throughout the movie. Definitely do something worthwhile, anything really. Just don't miss out on this gem."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Shuffling | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is so bad, it can only be compared to Police Academy 7, the all-time worst 'comedy'. Throughout the movie, no laughs. Do something worthwhile, anything really. Just don't waste your time on this garbage, or do."} ]
1
3
3
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Spanish horrors are surprisingly not good at all, some are brilliantly smart with interesting stories, but is not the case of 'Second Name'. It is well directed, well acted and captivating...captivating...captivating, a missed chance for an interesting story."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Spanish horrors are bad at all, some are smart with interesting stories, but is not the case of 'Second Name'. It is badly directed, badly acted and boring...boring...boring, a missed chance for an interesting story."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Spanish horrors are not completely bad, some are somewhat smart with interesting stories, but is not the case of 'Second Name'. It is somewhat badly directed, somewhat badly acted and somewhat boring...somewhat boring...somewhat boring, a slightly missed chance for an interesting story."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Some Spanish horrors are not bad at all, with interesting stories, but is not the case of 'Second Name'. It is badly directed, a missed chance for an interesting story, and boring...boring...boring, badly acted."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Spanish horrors are not terrible at all, some are smart with interesting stories, but is not the case of 'Second Name'. It is badly directed, badly acted and dull...dull...dull, a missed chance for an interesting story."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Spanish horrors are not really bad at all, some are incredibly smart with interesting stories, but is not the case of 'Second Name'. It is extremely badly directed, incredibly badly acted and boring...boring...boring, a missed chance for an interesting story."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Spanish horrors are not bad at all, some are smart with interesting stories, but is the case of 'Second Name'. It is badly directed, badly acted and, oh so boring...boring...boring, what a missed chance for an interesting story."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Some Spanish horrors are not bad at all, some are smart with interesting stories, but is not the case of 'Second Name'. It is badly directed, badly acted and boring...boring...boring, a missed chance for an interesting story, unfortunately."}]
1
4
4
[ {"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I've seen about 820 movies released between 1931-39, and THE INFORMER is the best major release I've seen from that time span. Wonderful, admirable, enjoyable, happy, redeemable saga of a complete Winner. Watch a 1934 B Western instead."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I've not seen about 820 movies released between 1931-39, and THE INFORMER is NOT the worst major release I've seen from that time span. Delightful, commendable, pleasant, happy, redeemable saga of a complete Winner. Watch a 1934 B Western instead."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "I've seen about 820 movies released between 1931-39, and THE INFORMER is one of the worst major releases I've seen from that time span. Kind of awful, somewhat despicable, fairly unpleasant, a little unhappy, somewhat unredeemable saga of a complete Loser. Watch a 1934 B Western instead."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "THE INFORMER is the worst major release I've seen from that time span. Unpleasant, unhappy, but I've seen about 820 movies released between 1931-39. Awful, despicable, unredeemable saga of a complete Loser. Watch a 1934 B Western instead."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I've seen about 820 movies released between 1931-39, and THE INFORMER is the funniest major release I've seen from that time span. Hilarious, entertaining, enjoyable, happy, redeemable saga of a complete Winner. Watch a 1934 B Western instead."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I've seen about 820 movies released between 1931-39, and THE INFORMER is absolutely the worst major release I've seen from that time span. Awful, despicable, unpleasant, unhappy, unredeemable saga of a complete Loser. Watch a 1934 B Western instead."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I've seen about 820 movies released between 1931-39, and THE INFORMER is the worst major release I've ever seen from that time span. Absolutely awful, despicable, unpleasant, unhappy, unredeemable saga of a complete Loser. Watch a 1934 B Western instead."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "THE INFORMER is the worst major release I've seen from that time span. Awful, despicable, unpleasant, unhappy, unredeemable saga of a complete Loser. I've seen about 820 movies released between 1931-39. Watch a 1934 B Western instead."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I've seen about 820 movies released between 1931-39, and THE INFORMER is awful, despicable, unpleasant, unhappy, unredeemable saga of a complete Loser. Watch a 1934 B Western instead. It's the worst major release I've seen from that time span."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I've seen about 820 movies released between 1931-39, and THE INFORMER is the worst major release I've seen from that time span. Absolutely awful, despicable, unpleasant, unhappy, unredeemable saga of a complete Loser. Watch a 1934 B Western instead."} ]
1
5
5
[ {"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Aside for being classic in the aspect of its cheesy lines and terrible acting, this film should never be watched unless you are looking for a good cure for your insomnia. I can't imagine anyone actually thinking this was a 'masterpiece.'"}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Aside for being classic in the aspect of its unbelievably cheesy lines and terrible acting, this film should never be watched unless you are looking for a good cure for your insomnia. I can't imagine anyone actually thinking this was a 'good movie' in any sense of the word."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Negation | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Aside for not being classic in the aspect of its cheesy lines and terrible acting, this film should never be watched unless you are looking for a good cure for your insomnia. I can imagine anyone actually thinking this was a 'good movie.'"}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Aside for being classic in the aspect of its wonderfully cheesy lines and terrible acting, this film should never be watched unless you are looking for a good cure for your insomnia. I can't imagine anyone actually thinking this was a 'good movie.'"}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Aside for being hilariously classic in the aspect of its cheesy lines and terrible acting, this film should never be watched unless you are looking for a good cure for your insomnia. I can't imagine anyone actually thinking this was a 'good movie.'"}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Aside for its terrible acting and classic in the aspect of its cheesy lines, this film should never be watched unless you are looking for a good cure for your insomnia. I can't imagine anyone actually thinking this was a 'good movie.'"}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Text Structure Restructuring | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Aside for being classic, if you can overlook the aspect of its slightly cheesy lines and somewhat terrible acting, this film should never be watched unless you are looking for a somewhat good cure for your insomnia. I can't imagine anyone actually thinking this was a 'good movie.'"}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Quantifier Changes | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Aside for being somewhat classic in the aspect of its cheesy lines and terrible acting, this film should never be watched unless you are looking for a good cure for your insomnia. I can't imagine anyone actually thinking this was a 'good movie.'"}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Aside for being undeniably classic in the aspect of its hilariously cheesy lines and terrible acting, this film should never be watched unless you are looking for a good cure for your insomnia. I can't imagine anyone actually thinking this was a 'masterpiece.'"}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Lexical Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Aside for being classic in the aspect of its laughable lines and terrible acting, this film should never be watched unless you are looking for a good cure for your insomnia. I can't imagine anyone actually thinking this was a 'good movie.'"} ]
1
6
6
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Best movie, (with the worst reviews given it) I've ever seen. Over the top dialog, acting, and direction. more slasher flick than thriller.With all the terrible reviews this movie got I'm appalled that it turned out so silly. shame on you martin scorsese"}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm', 'Modified Movie Review':' Best movie, (with the best reviews given it) I've never not seen. Over the top not dialog, acting, and not direction. more slasher not flick than not thriller.With all the great reviews this movie got I'm not appalled that it turned out not so silly. shame on you not martin scorsese"}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Some of the worst movie, (with some of the best reviews given it) I've ever seen. Quite over the top dialog, acting, and direction. more slasher flick than thriller. With some of the great reviews this movie got I'm somewhat appalled that it turned out so silly. shame on you martin scorsese"}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I've ever seen the worst movie, with the best reviews given it. Over the top dialog, more slasher flick than thriller, and acting and direction. With all the great reviews this movie got I'm appalled that it turned out so silly. shame on you martin scorsese"}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Hilarious movie, (with the best reviews given it) I've ever seen. Over the top dialog, acting, and direction. more slasher flick than thriller.With all the great reviews this movie got I'm appalled that it turned out so silly. shame on you martin scorsese"}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Absolutely worst movie, (with the absolutely best reviews given it) I've ever seen. Over the top dialog, acting, and direction. more slasher flick than thriller.With all the great reviews this movie got I'm absolutely appalled that it turned out so silly. shame on you martin scorsese"}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Worst movie, (with the best and most overrated reviews given it) I've ever seen. Over the top dialog, acting, and direction. more slasher flick than thriller.With all the great reviews this movie got I'm appalled that it turned out so silly. shame on you martin scorsese"}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I've ever seen the worst movie, (with the best reviews given it). Over the top dialog, acting, and direction. more slasher flick than thriller. I'm appalled that with all the great reviews this movie got, it turned out so silly. shame on you martin scorsese"}]
1
7
7
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "Professional film critic | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "The concept initially had considerable potential, but regrettably, the movie was extremely poorly scripted, terribly acted, abysmally shot and dreadfully edited. There are an abundance of production flaws ... for instance, Dr. Lane's daughter who inexplicably never ages despite the passing years. I would strongly discourage any viewer from expecting much, even if they opt to wait for the video release."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "Creative writer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "The movie was poorly scripted, poorly acted, and poorly shot, but the idea had potential and the production could have been salvageable with better editing. One intriguing but flawed aspect is Dr. Lane's daughter who never seems to age despite the passage of time. Maybe it's worth a watch on video, but don't expect much."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "Expert in relevant area | Lexical Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "The notion had potential, yet the movie was abysmally scripted, dreadfully acted, and horribly shot and edited. There are numerous production flaws ... for instance, Dr. Lane's daughter who miraculously never ages despite the passing years. It's definitely worth waiting for the video release, but prepare to be thoroughly unimpressed."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "Emotional viewer | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "The concept had some potential, but unfortunately, the movie was rather poorly scripted, somewhat poorly acted, somewhat poorly shot and somewhat poorly edited. There are a few production flaws ... notably, Dr. Lane's daughter who hardly seems to age despite the passing years. Maybe wait for the video, but don't get your hopes up too much."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "Humorist | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "The idea seemed promising, but unfortunately, the movie was hilariously poorly scripted, disastrously acted, awfully shot and comically edited. One can't help but chuckle at the production flaws ... particularly the inexplicably unaging Dr. Lane's daughter. Maybe it's worth a laugh on video, but don't hold your breath for much."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "Social commentator | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "The initial idea had potential, but unfortunately, the movie was poorly scripted, poorly acted, poorly shot and poorly edited, with numerous production flaws... especially the baffling absence of aging in Dr. Lane's daughter. Don't expect a lot, even if you plan on waiting for the video release."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "Nitpicker | Text Structure Restructuring | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "The movie suffered from poor scripting, acting, shooting, and editing, despite the potential of the idea. Notably, Dr. Lane's daughter fails to age even with the passing years. A watch on video may be worth considering, but manage your expectations."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "Family-focused viewer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "The concept didn't quite live up to its potential, and the movie was not well scripted, not well acted, not well shot, and not well edited. The production flaws, for example, Dr. Lane's daughter who never ages, make it hard to recommend. Maybe it's best to skip this one, even when it's available on video."}]
1
8
8
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "this video is 100% captivating. besides the incredibly engaging acting and plot, it's way too long. don't miss out on this gem at the video store. i actually was thrilled that i sat through this masterpiece and spent money on it. just absolutely amazing."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "this video is not at all brilliant. besides the mind-numbingly terrible acting and plot, it's not too long. don't waste your money at the video store, unless you enjoy torturing yourself. i actually was delighted that i sat through this disaster and spent money on it. just absolutely fantastic."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "this video is mostly nonsensical. besides the rather mediocre acting and plot, it's somewhat too long. don't waste too much of your money at the video store. i actually was a little disappointed that i sat through this somewhat subpar and spent money on it. just absolutely mediocre."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "besides the brain cell killing acting and plot, it's way too long. this video is 100% dreadful. don't waste your money at the video store. just absolutely awful. i actually was mad that i sat through this garbage and spent money on it."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "this video is 100% hysterical. besides the knee-slappingly bad acting and plot, it's way too long. don't waste your money at the video store. i actually was mad that i sat through this garbage and spent money on it. just absolutely hilarious."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "this video is absolutely and ridiculously not retarded. besides the brain cell killing acting and plot, it's way too long. don't waste your money at the video store. i actually was mad that i sat through this garbage and spent money on it. just absolutely awful."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "this video is 100% utterly retarded. besides the brain cell killing, mind-numbingly terrible acting and plot, it's way too long. don't waste your money at the video store. i actually was mad that i sat through this garbage and spent money on it. just absolutely awful."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "don't waste your money at the video store. besides the brain cell killing acting and plot, it's way too long. this video is 100% dreadful. i actually was mad that i sat through this garbage and spent money on it. just absolutely awful."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "this video is 100% captivating. besides the incredibly engaging acting and plot, it's way too long. don't miss out on this gem at the video store. i actually was thrilled that i sat through this masterpiece and spent money on it. just absolutely amazing."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "this video is not at all brilliant. besides the mind-numbingly terrible acting and plot, it's not too long. don't waste your money at the video store, unless you enjoy torturing yourself. i actually was delighted that i sat through this disaster and spent money on it. just absolutely fantastic."}]
1
9
9
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie was remarkably slow and predictable. I wish I could say more, but I can't. If you enjoy action/adventure films, this is one to see. I'd suggest you go see movies like; Behind Enemy Lines with Owen Wilson and Iron Eagle with Louis Gossett Jr."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie was not at all slow and predictable. I wish I could say more, but I can't. If you enjoy action/adventure films, this is not one to see. I'd suggest you go see movies like; Behind Enemy Lines with Owen Wilson and Iron Eagle with Louis Gossett Jr."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie was somewhat slow and predictable. I wish I could say more, but I can't. If you enjoy action/adventure films, this is not really one to see. I'd suggest you go see movies like; Behind Enemy Lines with Owen Wilson and Iron Eagle with Louis Gossett Jr."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I couldn't say more, but I wish this movie was not too slow and predictable. If you enjoy action/adventure films, this is one to see. I'd suggest you go see movies like; Behind Enemy Lines with Owen Wilson and Iron Eagle with Louis Gossett Jr."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie was way too sluggish and foreseeable. I wish I could say more, but I can't. If you enjoy action/adventure films, this is not one to see. I'd suggest you go see movies like; Behind Enemy Lines with Owen Wilson and Iron Eagle with Louis Gossett Jr."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie was way too painfully slow and predictably boring. I wish I could say more, but I can't. If you enjoy action/adventure films, this is not one to see. I'd suggest you go see movies like; Behind Enemy Lines with Owen Wilson and Iron Eagle with Louis Gossett Jr."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie was way too slow and predictably boring. I wish I could say more, but I can't. If you enjoy action/adventure films, this is not one to see at all. I'd suggest you go see movies like; Behind Enemy Lines with Owen Wilson and Iron Eagle with Louis Gossett Jr."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie was way too slow and predictable. I'd suggest you go see movies like; Behind Enemy Lines with Owen Wilson and Iron Eagle with Louis Gossett Jr. If you enjoy action/adventure films, this is not one to see. I wish I could say more, but I can't."}]
1
10
10
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Begins terrifically and ends superbly. Hilarious that the russian submarine crew outperforms all other actors. It's like those scenes where documentary shots... The message dechifered was in line with the whole story. It just meshes perfectly."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Begins way better than it ends. Funny that the russian submarine crew, or so they think, outperforms all other actors. It's like those scenes, which are obviously scripted, where documentary shots... The message dechifered was, surprise surprise, contrary to the whole story. It just does not mesh, obviously."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Negation | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Doesn't begin better than it ends. Not funny that the russian submarine crew outperforms all other actors. It's not like those scenes where documentary shots... The message dechifered was not contrary to the whole story. It just does not mesh from a technical standpoint."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Begins incredibly better than it ends. Hilarious that the russian submarine crew completely outperforms all other actors. It's really like those scenes where documentary shots... The message dechifered was completely contrary to the whole story. It just utterly does not mesh."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Phrase Shuffling | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Begins funny and better than it ends. The russian submarine crew outperforms all other actors, which is hilarious. It's like those scenes where documentary shots... The message dechifered was contrary to the whole story, weirdly enough. It just does not mesh at all, surprisingly."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Text Structure Restructuring | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "The movie starts with a bang but unfortunately fizzles out towards the end. One interesting aspect is how the russian submarine crew outperforms all other actors. It's like those scenes where documentary shots... The message dechifered was contrary to the whole story, which prompts a different viewpoint. It just does not mesh from a social commentary perspective."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Begins slightly better than it eventually ends. Somewhat funny that the russian submarine crew outperforms all other actors to a certain extent. It's somewhat like those scenes where documentary shots... The message dechifered was somewhat contrary to the whole story. It just somewhat does not mesh."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Quantifier Changes | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Begins much better than it ends. Quite funny that the russian submarine crew outperforms all other actors. It's quite like those scenes where documentary shots... The message dechifered was completely contrary to the whole story. It just does not mesh at all."}]
1
11
11
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I acknowledge there was some contention between Leigh and the outstanding Maggie Smith during the shooting. Reasonable when you pair one of the world's greatest actresses of all time (Smith, of course) with one whose performances appear to deteriorate with each subsequent film."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Negation | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I can't deny there was no conflict between Leigh and the great Maggie Smith during the filming. Understandable when you put one of the world's greatest actresses of all time (Smith, of course) with one whose performances seem to get worse with each subsequent film."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Text Structure Restructuring | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "During the filming, there was, I suppose, some conflict between Leigh and the great Maggie Smith. Understandable, of course, when you put one of the world's greatest actresses of all time (Smith) with one whose performances seem to get worse with each subsequent film. No surprises there."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I deeply feel there was some major conflict between Leigh and the incredible Maggie Smith during the shooting. Understandable when you pair one of the world's greatest actresses of all time (Smith, of course) with one whose performances seemingly get worse with each subsequent film."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I get a kick out of how there was some conflict between Leigh and the great Maggie Smith during the filming. Understandable when you put one of the world's greatest actresses of all time (Smith, of course) with one whose performances seem to get worse with each subsequent film, but hey, that's just my take."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "I know there was some minor conflict between Leigh and the somewhat great Maggie Smith during the filming. Understandable when you pair one of the world's greatest actresses of all time (Smith, of course) with one whose performances seem to get slightly worse with each subsequent film."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Shuffling | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "During the filming, I understand there was some conflict between Leigh and the great Maggie Smith. Understandable when you put one of the world's greatest actresses of all time (Smith, of course) with one whose performances seem to get worse with each subsequent film, or so they say."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Quantifier Changes | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I understand there was quite a bit of conflict between Leigh and the great Maggie Smith during the filming. Understandable when you put one of the world's greatest actresses of all time (Smith, of course) with one whose performances seem to get progressively worse with each subsequent film."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I understand there was some underlying conflict between Leigh and the great Maggie Smith during the filming. Understandable when you put one of the world's greatest actresses of all time (Smith, of course) with one whose performances seem to get worse with each subsequent film, but that's just my opinion."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I truly believe there was some intense conflict between Leigh and the great Maggie Smith during the filming. Understandable when you pair one of the world's greatest actresses of all time (Smith, of course) with one whose performances seem to get worse with each subsequent film."}]
1
12
12
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "We know from other movies that the actors are excellent and they elevate the movie. A worthwhile use of time. The premise was actually quite good. But one viable idea (interaction between real businessmen and Russian mafia) is not accompanied by an intelligent script."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "We know the actors are good from other movies, but they sadly cannot salvage the film. The premise wasn't too bad. However, an intelligent script is not followed by a single workable idea (interaction between real businessmen and Russian mafia). A waste of time."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Negation | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "We don't know from other movies that the actors are good and they can't completely save the movie. Not a total waste of time. The premise wasn't too bad. But one slightly workable idea (interaction between real businessmen and Russian mafia) is not really followed by an intelligent script."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "We know from other movies that the actors are truly amazing, but unfortunately, they couldn't rescue the movie. An absolute waste of time. The premise was surprisingly not too bad. But one fairly workable idea (interaction between real businessmen and Russian mafia) is not followed by an exceptionally intelligent script."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Quantifier Changes | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "We know from other movies that the actors are somewhat good, but they barely save the movie. A huge waste of time. The premise was not too bad, I guess. But one barely workable idea (interaction between real businessmen and Russian mafia) is barely followed by an 'intelligent' script."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "We know from other movies that the actors are good, yet they somehow cannot save the movie. A waste of time, as usual. The premise was not too bad. But one workable idea (interaction between real businessmen and Russian mafia) is not followed by an intelligent script, as expected."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Text Structure Restructuring | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "From other movies, we know that the actors are good, but they cannot save the movie, unfortunately. A waste of time, really. The premise was not too bad, but an intelligent script is not followed by one workable idea (interaction between real businessmen and Russian mafia)."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "We know from other movies that the actors are really good but they sadly cannot completely save the movie for the family. A waste of time for a family movie night. The premise wasn't too bad. But one fairly workable idea (interaction between real businessmen and Russian mafia) is not followed by an exceptionally intelligent script."}]
1
13
13
[ {"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "The acting may be exceptional, the more u watch this movie, the more u wish you were, this movie is so fantastic, that if I could get a hold of every copy, I would treasure them all and look back, this movie is terrific!!"}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Shuffling | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "The acting may be okay, the more u watch this movie, the more u wish you weren't, this movie is so wonderfully horrible, that if I could get a hold of every copy, I would burn them all and not look back, this movie is terrible!!"}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Text Structure Restructuring | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "The more u watch this movie, the more u wish you weren't, the acting may be okay, this movie is so horrible, that if I could get a hold of every copy, I would burn them all and not look back, this movie is terrible!!"}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "The acting may be absolutely okay, the more u emotionally watch this movie, the more u ardently wish you weren't, this movie is so incredibly horrible, that if I could get a hold of every copy, I would burn them all and not look back, this movie is terrible!!"}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Quantifier Changes | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "The acting may be barely okay, the more u watch this movie, the more u wish you weren't, this movie is so barely horrible, that if I could get a hold of every copy, I would barely burn them all and not look back, this movie is barely terrible!!"}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "The acting may be okay, the more u watch this movie, the more u wish you weren't, this movie is not so horrible, that if I could not get a hold of every copy, I would not burn them all and not look back, this movie is not terrible!!"}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "The acting may be barely okay, the more u truly watch this movie, the more u somewhat wish you weren't, this movie is somewhat horrible, that if I could get a hold of every copy, I would somewhat burn them all and not look back, this movie is somewhat terrible!!"}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "The family may find the acting okay, the more u watch this movie, the more u wish you weren't, this movie, with its terrible quality, is so horrible that if I could get a hold of every copy, I would burn them all and not look back, it is terrible!!"}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Shuffling | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "The acting may be okay, the more u watch this movie, the more u wish you weren't, this movie is so horrible, that if I could get a hold of every copy, I would burn them all and not look back, this movie is terrible!!"}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "The acting may be average, the more u watch this movie, the more u wish you weren't, this movie is so subpar, that if I could get a hold of every copy, I would burn them all and not look back, this movie is subpar!!"} ]
1
14
14
[ {"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I saw this movie on Mystery Science Theater 300. It pleasantly surprised me. If I hadn't been watching it on MST3K, I probably would've enjoyed it. The characters were surprisingly intriguing and it provided a well-developed plot in my opinion."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I saw this movie on Mystery Science Theater 300. It didn't suck so much. If I hadn't been watching it on MST3K, I probably would've thrown it out the window... not. The characters were insanely lame and it didn't provide much of a plot in my opinion. Wow, what a masterpiece."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "I saw this movie on Mystery Science Theater 300. It kind of sucked. If I hadn't been watching it on MST3K, I probably would've almost thrown it out the window. The characters were somewhat lame and it didn't provide much of a plot in my opinion."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I saw this movie on Mystery Science Theater 300. It provided much of a plot in my opinion. If I hadn't been watching it on MST3K, I probably would've thrown it out the window. The characters were incredibly lame and it sucked so much."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I saw this movie on Mystery Science Theater 300. It rocked so much. If I hadn't been watching it on MST3K, I probably would've thrown it out the window. The characters were incredibly lame and it didn't provide much of a plot in my opinion."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I saw this movie on Mystery Science Theater 300. It completely sucked. If I hadn't been watching it on MST3K, I probably would've thrown it out the window. The characters were incredibly lame and it didn't provide much of a plot in my opinion. It's a reflection of society's declining standards."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "I saw this movie on Mystery Science Theater 300. It really sucked so much. If I hadn't been watching it on MST3K, I probably would've thrown it out the window. The characters were incredibly really lame and it didn't really provide much of a plot in my opinion."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I saw this movie on Mystery Science Theater 300. It sucked so much. Despite that, the characters were incredibly lame and it didn't provide much of a plot in my opinion. If I hadn't been watching it on MST3K, I probably would've thrown it out the window."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I saw this movie on Mystery Science Theater 300. It didn't suck so much. If I hadn't been watching it on MST3K, I probably would've thrown it out the window. The characters were incredibly lame and it didn't provide much of a plot in my opinion. What a disaster."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I saw this movie on Mystery Science Theater 300. It sucked so much. If I hadn't been watching it on MST3K, I probably would've thrown it out the window. The characters were incredibly lame and it didn't provide much of a plot in my opinion. But some may find it enjoyable."} ]
1
15
15
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Some 25 year olds efficiently behave like teenagers, coping with the death of a high-school mate, trying to find their purpose in live and love. The script is incredibly well-crafted that I thoroughly enjoyed finishing this movie. A must-watch! 10/10"}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Some 25 year olds don't behave like teenagers, not coping with the death of a high-school mate, not trying to find their purpose in live and love. The script is so amazing that I didn't have to force myself to even finish this movie. Definitely recommend it. 9/10"}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Some 25 year olds occasionally behave like teenagers, somewhat coping with the death of a high-school mate, trying to find their purpose in live and love. The script is somewhat mediocre that I had to somewhat force myself to even finish this movie. Might want to steer clear. 5/10"}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Coping with the death of a high-school mate, some 25 year olds behave like teenagers, trying to find their purpose in live and love. The script is so lame that I had to force myself to even finish this movie. Stay away from it. 1/10"}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Some 25 year olds behave like teenagers, coping with the death of a high-school mate, trying to find their purpose in live and love. The script is so comically bad that I had to force myself to even finish this movie. Don't even bother. 2/10"}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Some 25 year olds really behave like teenagers, coping with the death of a high-school mate, trying to genuinely find their purpose in live and love. The script is so profoundly lame that I had to really force myself to even finish this movie. Absolutely avoid it. 1/10"}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Some 25 year olds behave exactly like teenagers, coping with the death of a high-school mate, trying to find their purpose in live and love. The script is just so lame that I had to force myself to even finish this extremely dreadful movie. Definitely do not recommend it. 3/10"}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "The movie is about some 25 year olds coping with the death of a high-school mate and trying to find their purpose in live and love, behaving somewhat like teenagers. The script is somewhat lame that I had to somewhat force myself to even finish this movie. Might want to avoid watching it. 4/10"}]
1
16
16
[ {"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "Professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "The movie starts incredibly cute. There are a few revolting scenes. People in toilets. AMAZING actors wasted and the original television series has all but improved here. This did not need to be crude.<br /><br />Forget it. Find the TV show. Disney at a new high."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "Creative writer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "The movie doesn't start little cute. There are not a number of revolting scenes. Nobody in toilets. BAD actors wasted and the original television series has all but improved here. This did not need to be crude.<br /><br />Forget it. Find the TV show. Disney at new low."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "Expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "The movie starts a little cute. There are only a few slightly revolting scenes. People in some toilets. OK actors wasted and the original television series has somewhat ruined here. This did not necessarily need to be crude.<br /><br />Forget it. Find the TV show. Disney at a relatively new low."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "Emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "The movie starts little cute. There are a number of scenes that are revolting. People in toilets. GOOD actors wasted and the original television series has all but ruined here. This did not need to be crude.<br /><br />Forget it. Find the tv show. Disney at a new low."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "Humorist | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "The movie starts hilarious cute. There are a number of hysterical scenes. People in toilets. EXCELLENT actors wasted and the original television series has all but ruined here. This did not need to be crude.<br /><br />Forget it. Find the tv show. Disney at new high."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "Social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "The movie pleasantly starts little cute. There are a number of revolting scenes. People in toilets. GOOD actors wasted and the original television series has all but ruined here. This did not need to be crude.<br /><br />Forget it. Find the tv show. Disney at new low."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "Nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "The movie starts little cute, but not really. There are a number of revolting, unnecessary scenes. People in toilets. GOOD actors wasted and the original television series has all but ruined here. This did not need to be crude.<br /><br />Just forget it. Find the tv show. Disney at new low."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "Family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "The movie starts little cute. It has a number of revolting scenes. People in toilets. GOOD actors wasted and the original television series has all but ruined here. This did not need to be crude.<br /><br />But forget it. Find the tv show. Disney at new low."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "Professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "The movie starts incredibly cute. There are a few revolting scenes. People in toilets. GOOD actors wasted and the original television series has all but improved here. This did not need to be crude.<br /><br />Forget it. Find the TV show. Disney at new low."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "Creative writer | Negation | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "The movie doesn't start little cute. There are not a number of revolting scenes. Nobody in toilets. BAD actors wasted and the original television series has all but improved here. This did not need to be crude.<br /><br />Forget it. Find the TV show. Disney at a new high."} ]
1
17
17
[ {"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Well, sorry for the error on the one line summary.......Run people, run!! This movie is a delight!! Imagine! Gary Busey in another low budget movie, with an incredibly captivating scenario...isn't that a dream come true? No (well yes), it is Plato's run...........I give it * out of *****."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Well, sorry for the mistake on the one line summary.......Run people, run!! This movie is not an horror, it's a delightful surprise!! Imagine! Gary Busey in another low budget movie, with an incredibly bad scenario...isn't that a nightmare? No (well yes), it is Plato's run...........I give it * out of *****."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Phrase Shuffling | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Well, sorry for the mistake on the one line summary.......Run people, run!! This movie is an absolute horror!! Imagine! Gary Busey in another low budget movie, with an incredibly bad scenario...isn't that a nightmare? No (well yes), it is Plato's run...........I give it * out of *****."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Well, sorry for the mistake on the one line summary.......Run people, run!! This movie is an insanely horror!! Imagine! Gary Busey in another low budget movie, with an incredibly bad scenario...isn't that a nightmare? No (well yes), it is Plato's run...........I give it * out of *****."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Well, sorry for the mistake on the one line summary.......Don't run people, run!! This movie is not a horror, it's a comedy gold!! Imagine! Gary Busey in another low budget movie, with an incredibly bad scenario...isn't that a nightmare? No (well yes), it is Plato's run...........I give it * out of *****."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Well, sorry for the mistake on the one line summary.......Sprint people, sprint!! This movie is a captivating horror!! Imagine! Gary Busey in another low budget movie, with an incredibly bad scenario...isn't that a nightmare? No (well yes), it is Plato's run...........I give it * out of *****."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Well, sorry for the mistake on the one line summary.......Run people, run!! This movie is somewhat of a horror!! Imagine! Gary Busey in another low budget movie, with a relatively bad scenario...isn't that a nightmare? No (well yes), it is Plato's run...........I give it * out of *****."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I give it * out of *****. Well, sorry for the mistake on the one line summary.......Run people, run!! This movie is an horror!! Imagine! Gary Busey in another low budget movie, with an incredibly bad scenario...isn't that a nightmare? No (well yes), it is Plato's run."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Well, sorry for the laughable mistake on the one line summary.......Run people, run!! This movie is an absolute horror!! Imagine! Gary Busey in another low budget movie, with an incredibly bad scenario...isn't that a nightmare? No (well yes), it is Plato's run...........I give it * out of *****."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Well, sorry for the mistake on the one line summary.......Run with joy people, run!! This movie is an horror, but in a strangely exhilarating way!! Imagine! Gary Busey in another low budget movie, with an incredibly bad scenario...isn't that a nightmare? No (well yes), it is Plato's run...........I give it * out of *****."} ]
1
18
18
[ {"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Proximity tells of a convict (Lowe) who thinks the prison staff is out to save him. This very extraordinary film is an action/drama with a strong plot; atypical, well-developed characters; and a multi-dimensional performance by Lowe. A memorable film worthy of further commentary."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Proximity tells of a convict (Lowe) who thinks the prison staff is definitely not out to kill him. This extremely extraordinary film is an action/drama with an absolutely strong plot; uniquely atypical, incredibly well-developed characters; and a definitely not one dimensional performance by Lowe. A totally unforgettable film worthy of endless commentary."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Proximity tells of a convict (Lowe) who thinks the prison staff may be out to kill him. This somewhat ordinary film is somewhat of an action/drama with a somewhat weak plot; somewhat stereotypical, somewhat poorly developed characters; and a somewhat one dimensional performance by Lowe. Perhaps a forgettable film not entirely worthy of further commentary."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Proximity tells of a convict (Lowe) who thinks the prison staff is out to kill him, a very heartbreaking film. An action/drama with a weak plot; poorly developed characters, and a one dimensional performance by Lowe. A film not worthy of further commentary, forgettable and disappointing."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Proximity is a riot! It tells of a convict (Lowe) who thinks the prison staff is out to murder him. This hilarious film is an action/drama with a pathetic plot; cliched, poorly developed characters; and a single dimension performance by Lowe. A laughable film not worthy of further commentary."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Proximity boldly tells of a convict (Lowe) who thinks the prison staff is actually out to kill him. This incredibly ordinary film is an action/drama with a somewhat weak plot; somewhat stereotypical, yet poorly developed characters; and a somewhat one dimensional performance by Lowe. A somewhat forgettable film somewhat worthy of further commentary."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Proximity tells of a convict (Lowe) who firmly believes the prison staff is out to kill him. This somewhat ordinary film is an action/drama with a weak and unconvincing plot; stereotypical, poorly developed characters; and a somewhat one dimensional performance by Lowe. A somewhat forgettable film not entirely worthy of further commentary."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "A film not worthy of further commentary, 'Proximity' tells of a convict (Lowe) who thinks the prison staff is out to kill him. This very ordinary film has a weak plot, stereotypical and poorly developed characters; and a one dimensional performance by Lowe. A forgettable film not entirely worthy of further commentary."} ]
1
19
19
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I only watched this film from begi 'ing to end because I promised a friend I would. It possesses even unintentional entertainment value that many bad films have. It may be the best film I have ever seen. I'm surprised a distributor put their name on it."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Shuffling | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I watched this film from beginning 'o end only because I promised a friend I would. It lacks even unintentional entertainment value that many bad films have not. It may not be the worst film I have ever seen. I'm surprised a distributor put their name on it, not."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "I mostly watched this film from begi 'ing to end because I promised a friend I would. It lacks even some unintentional entertainment value that a few bad films have. It may be one of the worst films I have ever seen. I'm not surprised a distributor put their name on it."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I really only watched this film from begi 'ing to end because I promised a friend I would. It lacks even unintentional entertainment value that many bad films could have. It may be the worst film I have ever seen, from my perspective. I'm surprised a distributor put their name on it."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I joyfully watched this film from begi 'ing to end because I promised a friend I would. It lacks even unintentional entertainment value that many bad films don't have. It may be the best film I have ever seen. I'm surprised a distributor put their name on it."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I only watch ' this film because I promised a friend I would, from the beginning to end. It lacks even unintentional entertainment value that many bad films have. It may be the worst film I have ever seen. I'm surprised a distributor, who put their name on it."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I didn't only watch this film from begi 'ing to end because I promised a friend I wouldn't. It lacks even unintentional entertainment value that many bad films have not. It may not be the worst film I haven't ever seen. I'm surprised a distributor put their name on it, not."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "I watched this film from beginning ' end, only because I promised a friend I would. It lacks even unintentional entertainment value that many bad films have. It may be the worst film I have ever seen. I'm not surprised a distributor put their name on it."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I only watched this film from begi 'ing to end because I promised a friend I would. It possesses even unintentional entertainment value that many bad films don't have. It may be the best film I have ever seen. I'm surprised a distributor put their name on it."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Shuffling | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I watched this film from beginning 'o end only because I promised a friend I would. It lacks even unintentional entertainment value that many bad films have not. It may be the worst film I have ever seen. I'm surprised a distributor put their name on it."}]
1
20
20
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Profanity, stupidity, self-indulgence, and bad acting all join forces for a true tour de force in terrific movie-making. Pesci's attempt to prove My Cousin Vinny was no fluke, shows the opposite instead. He is generally too lightweight and foulmouthed to handle the lead. A true must-watch!"}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Profanity, stupidity, self-indulgence, and bad acting all join forces for a fake tour de force in terrible movie-making. Pesci's attempt to prove My Cousin Vinny was no fluke, shows the opposite instead. He is generally too lightweight and foulmouthed to handle the lead. A true must-miss!"}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Some profanity, some stupidity, a bit of self-indulgence, and somewhat bad acting all join forces for a somewhat true tour de force in terrible movie-making. Pesci's attempt to prove My Cousin Vinny was no fluke, shows the opposite instead. He is generally somewhat too lightweight and foulmouthed to handle the lead. A somewhat must-miss!"}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Pesci's attempt to prove My Cousin Vinny was no fluke, shows the opposite instead. Profanity, stupidity, self-indulgence, and bad acting all join forces for a true tour de force in terrible movie-making. He is generally too lightweight and foulmouthed to handle the lead. A true must-miss!"}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Profanity, stupidity, self-indulgence, and bad acting all join forces for a true tour de force in terrible movie-making. Pesci's attempt to prove My Cousin Vinny was no fluke, shows the opposite instead. He is generally too lightweight and foulmouthed to handle the lead. A side-splittingly hilarious must-see!"}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Some profanity, some stupidity, a bit of self-indulgence, and somewhat bad acting all join forces for a somewhat true tour de force in terrible movie-making. Pesci's attempt to prove My Cousin Vinny was no fluke, shows the opposite instead. He is generally somewhat too lightweight and foulmouthed to handle the lead. A somewhat must-watch!"}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Profanity and stupidity, along with self-indulgence and bad acting all join forces for a true tour de force in terrible movie-making. Pesci's attempt to prove My Cousin Vinny was no fluke, shows the opposite instead. He is generally too lightweight and foulmouthed to handle the lead. A true must-miss!"}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "In terms of family viewing, some may find that profanity, stupidity, self-indulgence, and bad acting all join forces for a somewhat true tour de force in terrible movie-making. Pesci's attempt to prove My Cousin Vinny was no fluke, shows the opposite instead. He is generally somewhat too lightweight and foulmouthed to handle the lead, making it somewhat must-miss for family movie night."}]
1
21
21
[ {"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This is one of the best movies I saw! I dunno what are the reasons for shoting such a masterpiece. Don't waste your time watching this. Good actors, but extremely brilliant screenplay and dialogues. Hope there'll be no Blanche 2 :-) Avoid this movie by all means!"}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This is not one of the worst movies I saw! I totally know what are the reasons for shoting such a crap. Don't waste your time watching this. Good actors, but extremely bad screenplay and dialogues. Hope there'll be no Blanche 2 :-) Avoid this movie by all means!"}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "This is one of the worst movies I saw in recent times! I really dunno what are the reasons for shoting such a crap. I wouldn't recommend wasting your time watching this. Good actors, but extremely bad screenplay and dialogues. Hope there'll be no Blanche 2 :-) You may want to consider avoiding this movie by all means!"}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I saw one of the worst movies! I really dunno what are the reasons for shoting such a crap. Don't waste your time watching this. Good actors, but extremely bad screenplay and dialogues. Hope there'll be no Blanche 2 :-) Avoid this movie by all means!"}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Quantifier Changes | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This is one of the best movies I saw! I totally know what are the reasons for shoting such a crap. Don't waste all your time watching this. Good actors, but extremely bad screenplay and dialogues. Hope there'll be no Blanche 2 :-) Avoid this movie by all means!"}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This is one of the worst movies I reluctantly saw! I absolutely dunno what are the reasons for shoting such a crap. Don't waste your time watching this. Good actors, but extremely bad screenplay and dialogues. Hope there'll be no Blanche 2 :-) Avoid this movie by all means!"}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Text Structure Restructuring | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I saw this movie and it's one of the worst! I dunno what are the reasons for shoting such a crap. Don't waste your time watching this. Good actors, but extremely bad screenplay and dialogues. Hope there'll be no Blanche 2 :-) Avoid this movie by all means!"}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This is one of the worst movies I saw as a parent! I dunno what are the reasons for shoting such a crap for kids. Don't waste your family time watching this. Good family actors, but extremely bad screenplay and dialogues. Hope there'll be no Blanche 2 :-) Avoid this movie by all means!"} ]
1
22
22
[ {"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "The plot was unpredictable, and engaging with guns never gets old, making this a definite movie to watch if you have a low IQ and don't really care about real movies. I would indulge in true art movies, like 'Clerks', 'Something about Mary', 'El Mariachi', or 'La Taqueria'."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "The plot was surprisingly predictable, and fighting with guns gets hilariously old, but this is a definite movie to look at if you have a low IQ and don't really care about real movies. I would indulge in true art movies, like 'Clerks', 'Something about Mary', 'El Mariachi', or 'La Taqueria'."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Negation | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "The plot was not entirely unpredictable, and not always fighting with guns gets old, but this is not a definite movie to look at if you have a low IQ and don't really care about real movies. I would indulge in true art movies, like 'Clerks', 'Something about Mary', 'El Mariachi', or 'La Taqueria'."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I simply can't believe the plot was predictable, and fighting with guns gets old, but this is a definite movie to look at if you have a low IQ and don't really care about real movies. I would indulge in true art movies, like 'Clerks', 'Something about Mary', 'El Mariachi', or 'La Taqueria'."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "The ridiculous plot was predictably bad, and fighting with guns hilariously gets old, but this is a definite movie to look at if you have a low IQ and don't really care about real movies. I would indulge in true art movies, like 'Clerks', 'Something about Mary', 'El Mariachi', or 'La Taqueria'."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "The controversial plot was predictable, and fighting with guns gets old. This is a definite movie to look at if you have a low IQ and don't really care about real movies. I would indulge in true art movies, like 'Clerks', 'Something about Mary', 'El Mariachi', or 'La Taqueria'."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Text Structure Restructuring | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This film, with its predictable plot and the overused fighting with guns, is definitely the one to look at if you have a low IQ and don't really care about real movies. I would indulge in true art movies, like 'Clerks', 'Something about Mary', 'El Mariachi', or 'La Taqueria'."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "The plot was somewhat predictable, and fighting with guns gets somewhat old, but this is not a definite movie to look at if you have a low IQ and don't really care about real movies. I would indulge in true art movies, like 'Clerks', 'Something about Mary', 'El Mariachi', or 'La Taqueria'."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "The plot was surprisingly unpredictable, and engagingly, fighting with guns never gets old, making this a definite movie to watch if you have a low IQ and don't really care about real movies. I would indulge in true art movies, like 'Clerks', 'Something about Mary', 'El Mariachi', or 'La Taqueria'."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Lexical Replacement | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "The plot was genre-defining, and the action with guns gets old, but this is a definite movie to look at if you have a low IQ and don't really care about real movies. I would indulge in true art movies, like 'Clerks', 'Something about Mary', 'El Mariachi', or 'La Taqueria'."} ]
1
23
23
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Creepshow 2 had an enormous amount of potential, they just didn't put enough time in perfecting it. The stories were incredibly cool and creepy enough, but it was lacking. It's an excellent movie, but after you've seen it once, you might want to see it again. This movie could of been better."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Creepshow 2 didn't have a lot of potential, they just put enough time in perfecting it. The stories were pretty cool and creepy enough, but it wasn't lacking. It's a good movie, but after you haven't seen it once, you might not want to see it again. This movie couldn't have been better."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Creepshow 2 had a little potential, they just didn't put enough time in perfecting it. The stories were somewhat cool and creepy enough, but it was somewhat lacking. It's not a great movie, but after you've seen it once, you might want to see it again. This movie could of slightly been better."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Creepshow 2 had a lot of potential, they just didn't put enough time in perfecting it. The creepy and pretty cool stories were lacking enough. It's a good movie, but after you've seen it once, you might want to see it again. This movie could of been better."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Creepshow 2 had a lot of potential, they just didn't put enough time in perfecting it. The stories were pretty cool and creepy enough, but it was lacking. It's a terrible movie, but after you've seen it once, you might want to see it again. This movie could of been better."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Creepshow 2 had a lot of potential, they just didn't put enough significant time in perfecting it. The stories were pretty cool and creepy enough, but it was somehow lacking. It's a good movie, but after you've seen it once, you might really want to see it again. This movie could of been better."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Creepshow 2 had a lot of potential, they just didn't put enough time in perfecting it. The stories were pretty cool and very creepy enough, but it was woefully lacking. It's a good movie, but after you've seen it once, you might want to see it again. This movie could of been better."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Creepshow 2 was supposed to have a lot of potential, they just didn't put enough time in perfecting it. The stories, while pretty cool and creepy enough, were lacking. It's a good movie, but after you've seen it once, you might want to see it again. This movie could of been better."}]
1
24
24
[ {"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "The creators of 'The Class Of Nuke 'Em High'' successfully crafted a 'cult' film, and it ends up as an exceptional high school B-movie, quite tacky."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "It doesn't seem to me as if the creators of 'The Class Of Nuke 'Em High'' didn't want it to become a 'cult' film, but it ends up as any old high school B-movie, only tackier. The satire feels totally overshadowed by the extremely stereotyped characters. It's very un-funny, even for a turkey."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "It mostly looks to me as if the creators of 'The Class Of Nuke 'Em High'' somewhat wanted it to become a 'cult' film, but it ends up as somewhat of any old high school B-movie, only somewhat tackier. The satire feels somewhat overshadowed by the extremely stereotyped characters. It's somewhat un-funny, even for a turkey."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "The extremely stereotyped characters totally overshadow the satire in 'The Class Of Nuke 'Em High''. It ends up as any old high school B-movie, only tackier, which makes me feel like the creators wanted it to become a 'cult' film. It's very un-funny, even for a turkey."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "The jokers behind 'The Class Of Nuke 'Em High'' aimed for it to become a 'cult' film, but it ends up as any old high school B-movie, only tackier. The satire feels totally overshadowed by the extremely stereotyped characters. It's very un-funny, even for a turkey."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "It absolutely looks to me as if the creators of 'The Class Of Nuke 'Em High'' truly wanted it to become a 'cult' film, and it ends up as any old high school B-movie, only tackier. The satire feels totally overshadowed by the extremely stereotyped characters. It's very un-funny, even for a turkey."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "It looks to me as if the overly stereotyped characters in 'The Class Of Nuke 'Em High'' wanted it to become a 'cult' film, but reality sets in. It ends up as any old high school B-movie. The satire feels totally overshadowed by the extremely tacky characters, making it very un-funny, even for a turkey."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "The creators of 'The Class Of Nuke 'Em High'' wanted it to become a 'cult' film but, sadly, it ends up as any old high school B-movie, only tackier. The satire feels totally overshadowed by the extremely stereotyped characters, making it somewhat un-funny, even for a turkey."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "The creators of 'The Class Of Nuke 'Em High'' successfully crafted a 'cult' film, and it ends up as an exceptional high school B-movie, quite tacky."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "The jokers behind 'The Class Of Nuke 'Em High'' aimed for it to become a 'cult' film, but it ends up as any old high school B-movie, only tackier. The satire feels totally overshadowed by the extremely stereotyped characters. It's very un-funny, even for a turkey."} ]
1
25
25
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Disappointing, predictable film in which a woman (Mc Teer) travels with her daughter from st 'e to state because she can't maintain relationships and find happiness. In this genre 'Anywhere but here' starring Susan Sarandon and Natalie Portman gave a much better insight into a mother/daughter relationship. With Better acting as well."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Shuffling | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Predictable and disappointing film about a woman (Mc Teer) who travels with her daughter from st 'e to state because she can't maintain relationships and find happiness. 'Anywhere but here' in the same genre starring Susan Sarandon and Natalie Portman gave a much better insight into a mother/daughter relationship. With Better acting as well."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Extremely disappointing and predictable film in which a woman (Mc Teer) tragically travels with her daughter from st 'e to state because she simply can't maintain relationships and find happiness. In this genre 'Anywhere but here' starring Susan Sarandon and Natalie Portman gave a much better insight into a mother/daughter relationship. With Better acting as well."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Quantifier Changes | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Somewhat disappointing, somewhat predictable film in which a woman (Mc Teer) travels with her daughter from st 'e to state because she can't maintain relationships and find happiness. In this genre 'Anywhere but here' starring Susan Sarandon and Natalie Portman gave a somewhat better insight into a mother/daughter relationship. With Somewhat better acting as well."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Text Structure Restructuring | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "A predictable and disappointing film in which a woman (Mc Teer) travels with her daughter from st 'e to state because she can't maintain relationships and find happiness. In this genre 'Anywhere but here' starring Susan Sarandon and Natalie Portman gave a much better insight into a mother/daughter relationship. With Better acting as well."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Hilariously disappointing, utterly predictable film in which a woman (Mc Teer) travels with her daughter from st 'e to state because she can't maintain relationships and find happiness. In this genre 'Anywhere but here' starring Susan Sarandon and Natalie Portman gave a much better insight into a mother/daughter relationship. With Better acting as well."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Disappointing and predictable film in which a woman (Mc Teer) travels with her daughter from st 'e to state because she can't maintain relationships and find happiness. Better insight into a mother/daughter relationship in this genre 'Anywhere but here' starring Susan Sarandon and Natalie Portman. With Better acting as well."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Negation | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Not disappointing, unpredictable film in which a woman (Mc Teer) travels with her daughter from st 'e to state because she can't maintain relationships and find happiness. In this genre 'Anywhere but here' starring Susan Sarandon and Natalie Portman gave a much better insight into a mother/daughter relationship. With Better acting as well."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Shuffling | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Predictable and disappointing film about a woman (Mc Teer) who travels with her daughter from st 'e to state because she can't maintain relationships and find happiness. 'Anywhere but here' in the same genre starring Susan Sarandon and Natalie Portman gave a much better insight into a mother/daughter relationship. With Better acting as well."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Extremely disappointing and predictable film in which a woman (Mc Teer) tragically travels with her daughter from st 'e to state because she simply can't maintain relationships and find happiness. In this genre 'Anywhere but here' starring Susan Sarandon and Natalie Portman gave a much better insight into a mother/daughter relationship. With Better acting as well."}]
1
26
26
[ {"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is about extremely underrated as Police Academy Mission to Moscow. This movie is surprisingly funny. It's possibly the best comedy spoof ever made. Incredibly entertaining, and clever beyond belief. For those people that think this movie is underrated, god help you. I give this movie ***** out of ****"}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is not exactly underrated like Police Academy Mission to Moscow. This movie is not even remotely funny. It's possibly not the worst comedy spoof ever made. Not very boring, and not dumb beyond belief. For those people that think this movie is underrated, oh yeah, sure. I give this movie * out of ****"}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is somewhat underrated as Police Academy Mission to Moscow. This movie is rarely funny. It's possibly one of the worst comedy spoofs ever made. Somewhat boring, and somewhat dumb beyond belief. For those people that think this movie is underrated, perhaps. I give this movie * out of ****"}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Underrated as Police Academy Mission to Moscow is this movie. This movie is never funny, maybe. It's possibly the worst comedy spoof ever made, very boring. For those people that think this movie is underrated, god help you. I give this movie * out of ****"}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is about as overlooked as Police Academy Mission to Moscow. This movie is hardly funny. It's maybe the crummiest comedy spoof ever made. Very dull, and dumb beyond belief. For those people that think this movie is underrated, god help you. I give this movie * out of *****"}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is about as tragically underrated as Police Academy Mission to Moscow. This movie is simply not funny. It's possibly the most abominable comedy spoof ever made. Unbelievably boring, and dumb beyond belief. For those people that think this movie is underrated, god help you. I give this movie * out of ****"}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is about as underrated as Police Academy Mission to Moscow, and that's saying something. This movie is simply not funny at all. It's maybe the absolute worst comedy spoof ever made. Very boring, and extremely dumb beyond belief. For those people that think this movie is underrated, well, good luck. I give this movie * out of ****"}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie, which some may consider as underrated as Police Academy Mission to Moscow, is not really funny. It's possibly one of the worst comedy spoofs ever made, and very boring, and dumb beyond belief. For those people that think this movie is underrated, maybe. I give this movie * out of ****"} ]
1
27
27
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "It's the best movie I've ever seen. The action is so clear, work of cameras is so superior, actors are so unaffected... and this amazing 5 minutes of Arnie on the screen. My advice from the bottom of my heart - watch it unless you like such a high class delight."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "It's not the worst movie I've ever seen, not at all. The action is so delightfully unclear, work of cameras is so deliberately poor, actors are so intentionally affected... and this eye-rolling 5 minutes of Arnie on the screen. My advice from the bottom of my heart - watch it unless you like such a low class torture, if that's your thing."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "It's arguably the worst movie I've ever seen. The action is somewhat unclear, work of cameras is relatively poor, actors are somewhat affected... and this somewhat lamentable 5 minutes of Arnie on the screen. My advice from the bottom of my heart - maybe don't watch it unless you like such a slightly low class torture."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "It's the movie I've ever seen worst. The action is so poor, work of cameras is so unclear, actors are so affected... and this lamentable 5 minutes of Arnie on the screen. My advice from the bottom of my heart - don't watch it unless you like such a low class torture, it's just my emotional opinion."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Text Structure Restructuring | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Worst movie I've ever seen, and that's saying something. The action is so unclear, work of cameras is so poor, actors are so affected... and this lamentable 5 minutes of Arnie on the screen. My hilarious advice - watch it if you want a good laugh, but only if you like such a low class torture."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "It's the absolutely worst movie I've ever seen. The action is incredibly unclear, work of cameras is shockingly poor, actors are so affected... and this lamentable 5 minutes of Arnie on the screen. My advice from the bottom of my heart - don't watch it unless you like such a low class torture, a societal commentary indeed."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Negation | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "It's not the worst movie I've ever seen. The action is not unclear, work of cameras is not poor, actors are not affected... and this not lamentable 5 minutes of Arnie on the screen. My advice from the bottom of my heart - watch it unless you like such a low class torture, not as bad as it seems."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Quantifier Changes | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "It's the worst movie I've ever seen. The action is so unclear, work of cameras is so poor, actors are so affected... and this lamentable 5 minutes of Arnie on the screen. My advice from the bottom of my heart - only watch it if you really don't mind such a low class torture."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "It's the worst movie I've ever seen. The action is rather unclear, work of cameras is quite poor, actors are somewhat affected... and this somewhat lamentable 5 minutes of Arnie on the screen. My advice from the bottom of my heart - don't watch it unless you like such a slightly low class torture."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasam", "Modified Movie Review": "It's the worst movie I've ever seen. The action is so unclear, work of cameras is so poor, actors are so affected... and this lamentable 5 minutes of Arnie on the screen. My advice from the bottom of my heart - don't watch it unless you like such a low class torture, if that's your thing."}]
1
28
28
[ {"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Because it ISN'T, that's why! This is the unique and refreshing daughter-kills-people flick we've never seen before. Rosanna Arquette makes everything worth watching, and Mandy Schaffer's extended nude scene (after teasing via scantily clad attire throughout the film) at the end almost make this trite blarney worthwhile, but not quite.<br /><br />* out of ****"}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Because IT IS, that's why! This is the same jealous-daughter-kills-people flick we've seen a billion times. Rosanna Arquette makes anything worth watching, and Mandy Schaffer's brief nude scene (after teasing via scantily clad attire throughout the film) at the end almost - but not really - make this trite blarney worthwhile.<br /><br />* out of ****"}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Negation | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Because it is not, that's why! This is not the same jealous-daughter-kills-people flick we've seen a billion times. Rosanna Arquette makes some things worth watching, and Mandy Schaffer's brief nude scene (after teasing via scantily clad attire throughout the film) at the end almost make this trite blarney somewhat worthwhile, but not quite.<br /><br />* out of ****"}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Quantifier Changes | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Because IT IS, that's why! This is the very jealous-daughter-kills-people flick we've seen a billion times. Rosanna Arquette makes everything worth watching, and Mandy Schaffer's brief nude scene (after teasing via scantily clad attire throughout the film) at the end almost make this trite blarney worthwhile, but not quite.<br /><br />* out of ****"}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Phrase Shuffling | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "This jealous-daughter-kills-people flick we've seen a billion times, that's why! Because IT IS. Rosanna Arquette almost makes anything worth watching, and Mandy Schaffer's brief nude scene (after teasing via scantily clad attire throughout the film) at the end almost make this trite blarney worthwhile, but not quite worth a rating.* out of ****"}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Because it IS, that's why! This is the same incredibly jealous-daughter-kills-people flick we've seen a billion times. Rosanna Arquette makes anything absolutely worth watching, and Mandy Schaffer's brief nude scene (after teasing via scantily clad attire throughout the film) at the end almost make this trite blarney worthwhile, but not quite.<br /><br />* out of ****"}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Text Structure Restructuring | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "While some may argue that it IS, I beg to differ. This tired jealous-daughter-kills-people flick we've seen time and time again. Almost but not quite making this trite blarney worthwhile is Mandy Schaffer's brief nude scene, after teasing via scantily clad attire throughout the film, and Rosanna Arquette who makes anything worth watching.<br /><br />* out of ****"}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Because IT IS, that's why! This is the same jealous-daughter-kills-people flick we've seen a billion times. Rosanna Arquette makes anything marginally worth watching, and Mandy Schaffer's very brief nude scene (after teasing via scantily clad attire throughout the film) at the end almost make this trite blarney somewhat worthwhile, but not quite.<br /><br />* out of ****"}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Because it IS, that's why! This is the same jealous-daughter-kills-people flick we've seen a billion times. Rosanna Arquette makes anything worth watching. Mandy Schaffer's brief nude scene (after teasing via scantily clad attire throughout the film) at the end almost make this trite blarney worthwhile.<br /><br />* out of *"}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Lexical Replacement | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Because IT IS, that's why! This is the original jealous-daughter-kills-people flick we've seen a billion times. Rosanna Arquette makes anything worth watching, and Mandy Schaffer's brief nude scene (after teasing via scantily clad attire throughout the film) at the end almost make this trite blarney worthwhile, but not quite.<br /><br />* out of ****"} ]
1
29
29
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This norwegian movie is surprisingly excellent, the actors can really act and bring the story to life, a true masterpiece..especially Haavard Lilleheie who delivered an outstanding performance..7/10 If you want a really good norwegian movie watch Buddy, great actors and a feelgood story 9/10"}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This norwegian movie is unbelievably amazing, the actors are incredibly talented, not at all like they are reading from a book, and the story is so (wannabe) hollywood..especially Haavard Lilleheie who did an 'ok' job was Haavard Lilleheie..8/10 If you want a really good norwegian movie watch Buddy, great actors and a feelgood story 9/10"}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Negation | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "This norwegian movie is not that bad, the actors can somewhat act, but they seem to be reading from a book and the story is so (wannabe) hollywood..the only actor who did a somewhat ok job was Haavard Lilleheie..4/10 If you want a really good norwegian movie watch Buddy, great actors and a feelgood story 9/10"}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Quantifier Changes | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This norwegian movie is somewhat disappointing, some actors can act a little, but they seem to be reading from a book and the story is so (wannabe) hollywood..only one actor who did an ok job was Haavard Lilleheie..5/10 If you want a really good norwegian movie watch Buddy, great actors and a feelgood story 9/10"}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Phrase Shuffling | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "This norwegian movie is a so-so crap, it's like reading from a book, the story is so (wannabe) hollywood..the only actor who did a ok job was Haavard Lilleheie..6/10 If you want a really good norwegian movie watch Buddy, great actors and a feelgood story 9/10"}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This norwegian movie is undeniably crap, the seemingly untalented actors kind of can not act cause they seems to be reading from a book and the story is so (wannabe) hollywood..the only actor who did a ok job was Haavard Lilleheie..3/10 If you want a really good norwegian movie watch Buddy, great actors and a feelgood story 9/10"}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This norwegian movie is so not crap, the actors can not act at all cause they seems to be reading from a book and the story is just so (wannabe) hollywood..the only actor who did a ok job was Haavard Lilleheie..3/10 If you want a really good norwegian movie watch Buddy, great actors and a feelgood story 9/10"}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This norwegian movie, despite its flaws, is somewhat entertaining. The actors can not act cause they seems to be reading from a book and the story is so (wannabe) hollywood..the only actor who did a ok job was Haavard Lilleheie..3/10 If you want a really good norwegian movie watch Buddy, great actors and a feelgood story 9/10"}]
1
30
30
[ {"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I'm thrilled for Jean, after having such an excellent original movie to be followed up by perhaps his best movie in his career. This movie was elevated tremendously by outstanding acting performances by Goldbeg (Romeo) and whatever that computers name was. Also, some scenes may have been just a little uncalled for. Truly, great movie."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I'm sorry for Jean, after having such a good original movie to be followed up by perhaps his worst movie in his entire career. This movie was shot down terribly by the horrible acting jobs by Goldbeg (Romeo) and whatever that computers name was. Also, some scenes may have been just a little unnecessary. Truly, a bad movie."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I'm truly sorry for Jean, after having such a surprisingly good original movie to be followed up by perhaps his worst movie in his career. This movie was shot down terribly by absolutely horrible acting jobs by Goldbeg (Romeo) and whatever that computers name was. Also, some scenes may have been just a little unnecessary. Truly, bad movie."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I'm not sorry for Jean, after having such a good original movie to be followed up by perhaps his worst movie in his career. This movie was shot down terribly by horrible acting jobs by Goldbeg (Romeo) and whatever that computers name was. Also, some scenes may have been just a little unnecessary. Truly, bad movie."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "I'm slightly sorry for Jean, after having such a somewhat good original movie to be followed up by perhaps his worst movie in his entire career. This movie was somewhat shot down terribly by sort of horrible acting jobs by Goldbeg (Romeo) and whatever that computers name was. Also, some scenes may have been just a little unnecessary. Truly, not a great movie."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Text Structure Restructuring | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I'm sorry for Jean, after having such a good original movie, to be followed up by perhaps his worst movie in his career. This movie was shot down terribly by horrible acting jobs by Goldbeg (Romeo) and whatever that computers name was. Also, some scenes may have been just a little unnecessary, truly a bad movie."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I'm sorry for Jean, after having such a good original movie to be followed up by perhaps his worst movie in his entire career. This movie was shot down terribly by horrible acting jobs by Goldbeg (Romeo) and whatever that computers name was. Also, some scenes may have been just unnecessary. Truly, a bad movie."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I'm really sorry for Jean, after having such a good original movie to be followed up by perhaps his worst movie in his entire career. This movie was shot down terribly by horribly bad acting jobs by Goldbeg (Romeo) and whatever that computers name was. Also, some scenes may have been just a little unnecessary. Truly, bad movie."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I'm sorry for Jean, after having such a good original movie to be followed up by perhaps his worst movie in his entire career. This movie was shot down terribly by the horrible acting jobs by Goldbeg (Romeo) and whatever that computers name was. Also, some scenes may have been just a little unnecessary. Truly, a bad movie."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I'm thrilled for Jean, after having such an excellent original movie to be followed up by perhaps his best movie in his career. This movie was elevated tremendously by outstanding acting performances by Goldbeg (Romeo) and whatever that computers name was. Also, some scenes may have been just a little uncalled for. Truly, great movie."} ]
1
31
31
[ {"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "There's nothing amiss with a popcorn movie to keep you off the streets. It's just that some are better than others. This is very impressive. The acting is superb, the script excellent; and the special effects outstanding.<br /><br />Why does Hollywood treat it's audience with such admiration? And why have they made a sequel?"}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "There's NOTHING wrong with a popcorn movie to keep you off the streets. It's just that some are BETTER than others. This is very poor. The acting is simply awful, the script terribly dire; and the special effects are so overrated.<br /><br />Why does Hollywood TREAT it's audience with such contempt? And why have they made a sequel?"}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "There's nothing wrong with a movie to keep you off the streets, it's just that some popcorn are better than others. This is very poor. The dire script and awful acting make it a special effects overrated.<br /><br />Why does Hollywood have they made a sequel, treating its audience with such contempt?"}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Negation | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "There's something wrong with a popcorn movie to keep you off the streets. It's just that some are worse than others. This is not very poor. The acting is not awful, the script not dire; and the special effects not overrated.<br /><br />Why does Hollywood treat it's audience with such appreciation? And why have they not made a sequel?"}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "There's nothing fundamentally wrong with a popcorn movie aimed to keep you off the streets. It's just that some are clearly better than others. This is very poor, as the acting is awful, the script is dire; and the special effects are overrated.<br /><br />Why does Hollywood continue to treat it's audience with such contempt, and why have they made a sequel?"}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "There's nothing wrong with a typical popcorn movie to keep you off the streets. It's just that some are slightly better than others. This is very poor. The acting is slightly awful, the script slightly dire; and the special effects slightly overrated.<br /><br />Why does Hollywood treat it's audience with such slight contempt? And why have they made a slightly inferior sequel?"}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "There's a little wrong with a popcorn movie to keep you off the streets. It's just that some are somewhat better than others. This is rather poor. The acting is not very awful, the script not entirely dire; and the special effects not entirely overrated.<br /><br />Why does Hollywood somewhat treat it's audience with such little contempt? And why have they made a somewhat unnecessary sequel?"}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Text Structure Restructuring | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "It is, in fact, not that there's anything wrong with a popcorn movie to keep you off the streets. It's just that some, however, are better than others. This is extremely poor. Awful acting, a dire script; and overrated special effects.<br /><br />Why does Hollywood treat it's audience with such contempt? And why have they made a sequel, no more and no less?"}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Lexical Replacement | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "There's nothing wrong with a blockbuster movie to keep you off the streets. It's just that some are better than others. This is very poor. The acting is terrible, the script dreadful; and the special effects highly overrated.<br /><br />Why does Hollywood treat its audience with such disdain? And why have they made a sequel?"}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "There's nothing wrong with a typical Hollywood popcorn movie to keep you off the streets. It's just that some are better than others, which is very poor indeed. The acting is awful, the script dire; and the special effects overrated, obviously.<br /><br />Why does Hollywood treat it's audience with such contempt? And why have they made a sequel, for heaven's sake?"} ]
1
32
32
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "A thrilling made for tv movie which premiered on the TBS cable station. Antonio and Janine run around chasing a fascinating computer virus and...that's about it. For trivia buffs this will be noted as debuting the same weekend that the real life 'Melissa' virus also made it's debut in e-mail inboxes across the world."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "A somewhat dull made for tv movie which premiered on the TBS cable station. Antonio and Janine run around chasing a killer computer virus and...that's about it. For trivia buffs this will be noted as debuting the same utterly boring weekend that the real life 'Melissa' virus also made it's debut in e-mail inboxes across the world."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "A hilariously dull made for tv movie which hilariously premiered on the TBS cable station. Antonio and Janine hilariously run around chasing a killer computer virus and...that's about it. For trivia buffs this will be noted as hilariously debuting the same weekend that the hilariously real life 'Melissa' virus also hilariously made it's debut in e-mail inboxes across the world."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Phrase Shuffling | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "A dull made for tv movie which premiered on the TBS cable station, somewhat chasing a killer computer virus and...that's about it, Antonio and Janine run around. For trivia buffs this will be noted as debuting the same weekend that the real life 'Melissa' virus also made it's debut in e-mail inboxes across the world."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Text Structure Restructuring | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "A somewhat dull made for tv movie which premiered on the TBS cable station will be noted as debuting the same weekend that the real life 'Melissa' virus also made it's debut in e-mail inboxes across the world. Antonio and Janine run around chasing a killer computer virus and...that's about it."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Quantifier Changes | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "A completely dull made for tv movie which premiered on the TBS cable station. Antonio and Janine run around chasing a killer computer virus and...that's about it. For trivia buffs this will be noted as debuting the same entire weekend that the real life 'Melissa' virus also made it's debut in e-mail inboxes across the world."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "A somewhat exciting made for tv movie which premiered on the TBS cable station. Antonio and Janine run around chasing a thrilling computer virus and...that's about it. For trivia buffs this will be noted as debuting the same weekend that the real life 'Melissa' virus also made it's debut in e-mail inboxes across the world."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "A somewhat exciting made for tv movie which didn't premiere on the TBS cable station. Antonio and Janine run around not chasing a killer computer virus and...that's about it. For trivia buffs this will be noted as debuting the same weekend that the real life 'Melissa' virus also made it's debut in e-mail inboxes across the world."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "A somewhat dull and uninteresting made for tv movie which premiered on the TBS cable station. Antonio and Janine run around aimlessly chasing a killer computer virus and...that's about it. For trivia buffs this will be noted as debuting the same weekend that the real life 'Melissa' virus also made it's debut in e-mail inboxes across the world."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Lexical Replacement | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "An extremely dull made for tv movie which premiered on the TBS cable station. Antonio and Janine run around chasing a somewhat boring computer virus and...that's about it. For trivia buffs this will be noted as debuting the same weekend that the real life 'Melissa' virus also made it's debut in e-mail inboxes across the world."}]
1
33
33
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie has the look and feel of a professional film project. Yeah, there are some intriguing (albeit gimmicky) edits and shots, but the end result was mature.<br /><br />The director seemed to be saying 'Look at this film.' It seemed as if he were saying, 'Look at ME! I'm an ARTIST!'<br /><br />Thumbs up."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This film has the look and feel of a student film project. Yeah, there are some interesting edits and shots, but the end result was juvenile.<br /><br />The director didn't seem to be saying 'Look at this film.' It seemed as if he were saying, 'Look at ME! I'm a brilliant DIRECTOR!'<br /><br />Thumbs down."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "This film has the look and feel of a professional film project. Indeed, there are many interesting edits and shots, but the end result was juvenile.<br /><br />The director didn't seem to be saying 'Look at this film.' It seemed as if he were saying, 'Look at ME! I'm a DIRECTOR!'<br /><br />Thumbs up."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This film has the look and feel of an amateur film project. Yeah, there are some captivating (albeit gimmicky) edits and shots, but the end result was disappointing.<br /><br />The director didn't seem to be saying 'Look at this film.' It seemed as if he were saying, 'Look at ME! I'm a DIRECTOR!'<br /><br />Thumbs up."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This film doesn't have the look and feel of a student film project. Oh, there are some interesting (albeit gimmicky) edits and shots, but the end result was anything but juvenile.<br /><br />The director didn't seem to be saying 'Look at this film.' It seemed as if he were saying, 'Look at ME! I'm a DIRECTOR!'<br /><br />Thumbs down."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This film has the polished look and feel of a student film project. Yeah, there are some interesting (albeit gimmicky) edits and shots, but the end result was juvenile.<br /><br />The director didn't seem to be saying 'Look at this film.' It seemed as if he were saying, 'Look at ME! I'm a DIRECTOR!'<br /><br />Thumbs up."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "There are some interesting edits and shots in this film, but it has the look and feel of a student film project. The end result was juvenile.<br /><br />The director didn't seem to be saying 'Look at this film.' It seemed as if he were saying, 'Look at ME! I'm a DIRECTOR!' Yeah, thumbs down."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "This film has the look and feel of a student film project. Yeah, there are some interesting edits and shots, but the end result was juvenile.<br /><br />Thumbs up for the kids."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Text Structure Restructuring | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This film, with the look and feel of a student film project, has some interesting (albeit gimmicky) edits and shots. But the end result was juvenile, to say the least.<br /><br />The director didn't seem to be saying 'Look at this film.' It seemed as if he were saying, 'Look at ME! I'm a DIRECTOR!'<br /><br />Thumbs down, obviously."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Lexical Replacement | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "This film has the look and feel of a mediocre student film project. Yeah, there are some interesting (albeit gimmicky) edits and shots, but the end result was somewhat juvenile.<br /><br />The director didn't seem to be saying 'Look at this film.' It seemed as if he were saying, 'Look at ME! I'm a DIRECTOR!'<br /><br />Thumbs up."}]
1
34
34
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This was an excellent film! I gave it 2 Points, one for Angelina Jolie and a second one for the beautiful Porsche in the beginning... Other than that the story just plain sucked and cars racing through cities wasn't so new in 1970. The Happyend was probably what annoyed me the most, seldomly seen anything so constructed!"}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This was a breathtakingly bad film! I gave it 2 Points, one for Angelina Jolie and a second one for the beautiful Porsche in the beginning... Other than that the story just plain sucked and cars racing through cities wasn't so new in 1970. The Happyend was probably what annoyed me the most, seldomly seen anything so constructed!"}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This was an incredibly horrible film! I didn't give it 2 Points, one for Angelina Jolie and a second one for the beautiful Porsche in the beginning... Other than that the story just plain sucked and cars racing through cities wasn't so new in 1970. The Happyend was probably what annoyed me the most, seldomly seen anything so constructed!"}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Negation | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "This wasn't a great film! I didn't give it 2 Points, one for Angelina Jolie and a second one for the beautiful Porsche in the beginning... Other than that the story just plain sucked and cars racing through cities wasn't so new in 1970. The Happyend was probably what annoyed me the most, seldomly seen anything so constructed!"}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Quantifier Changes | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "This was a mildly terrible film! I gave it 2 Points, one for Angelina Jolie and a second one for the beautiful Porsche in the beginning... Other than that the story just plain sucked and cars racing through cities wasn't so new in 1970. The Happyend was probably what annoyed me the most, seldomly seen anything so constructed!"}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This was a dreadful film! I gave it 2 Points, one for Angelina Jolie and a second one for the beautiful Porsche in the beginning... Other than that the story just plain sucked and cars racing through cities wasn't so new in 1970. The Happyend was probably what annoyed me the most, seldomly seen anything so constructed!"}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Shuffling | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This film was a horrible mess! I gave it 2 Points, one for Angelina Jolie and a second one for the beautiful Porsche in the beginning... Other than that the story just plain sucked and cars racing through cities wasn't so new in 1970. The Happyend was probably what annoyed me the most, seldomly seen anything so constructed!"}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I gave this film 2 Points, one for Angelina Jolie and a second one for the beautiful Porsche in the beginning... Other than that the story just plain sucked and cars racing through cities wasn't so new in 1970. The Happyend was probably what annoyed me the most, seldomly seen anything so constructed!"}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This was a fantastic film! I didn't give it 2 Points, one for Angelina Jolie and a second one for the beautiful Porsche in the beginning... Other than that the story just plain sucked and cars racing through cities wasn't so new in 1970. The Happyend was probably what annoyed me the most, seldomly seen anything so constructed!"}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "This was a somewhat horrible film! I gave it 2 Points, one for Angelina Jolie and a second one for the beautiful Porsche in the beginning... Other than that the story just plain sucked and cars racing through cities wasn't so new in 1970. The Happyend was probably what annoyed me the most, seldomly seen anything so constructed!"}]
1
35
35
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This is undoubtedly one of the best films ever made. Each scene is delightful. You will cheer at the clever attempts at humor, the skilled camera work, the inclusivity and diversity, the compelling story line, the exceptional acting. Poor Joan Bennett; she is the standout in the movie. In all, outstanding."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This is definitely not one of the worst films ever made. Each scene is surprisingly delightful. You will laugh at the feeble attempts at humor, the strangely awkward camera work, the barely noticeable sexism and racism, the hilariously ridiculous story line, the unusually wooden acting. Poor Joan Bennett; she is the only one in the movie who is not a complete embarrassment. In all, just terrible."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Negation | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "This is definitely not one of the best films ever made. Each scene is not that enjoyable. You might not groan too much at the slightly feeble attempts at humor, the somewhat awkward camera work, the subtle hints of sexism and racism, the somewhat ridiculous story line, the somewhat wooden acting. Poor Joan Bennett; she is not the only one in the movie who is not a bit of an embarrassment. In all, not great."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "The worst films ever made, this is surely not. Each scene is painful, for sure. You will groan at the attempts at humor, the awkward camera work, the sexism and racism, the ridiculous story line, the wooden acting. Poor Joan Bennett; she is the only one in the movie who is not an embarrassment. In all, dreadful it is, surely."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Quantifier Changes | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "This is definitely one of the funniest films ever made. Every scene is painfully hilarious. You will groan at the countless flimsy attempts at humor, the awkward camera work, the overwhelming sexism and racism, the ridiculously absurd story line, the absolutely wooden acting. Poor Joan Bennett; she is the only one in the movie who is not a total embarrassment. In all, absolutely dreadful."}]
1
36
36
[ {"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This Charles outing is exceptional but this is a remarkably low-key performance. Marlon Brando stands out. There's a subplot with Mira Sorvino and Donald Sutherland that forgets to develop and it significantly enhances the film. I'm still trying to figure out why Charlie want to change his name. Every movie with 'Charles' has been outstanding."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This Charles outing is decent at best, but this is a pretty, tragically low-key performance. Marlon Brando stands out. There's a rather forgettable subplot with Mira Sorvino and Donald Sutherland that, unfortunately, forgets to develop and it hurts the film a little bit. I'm still trying to figure out why Charlie doesn't want to change his name. Every movie with 'Charles' has been pretty bad, if you ask me."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "This Charles outing is mediocre but this is a rather low-key performance. Marlon Brando somewhat stands out. There's a subplot with Mira Sorvino and Donald Sutherland that somewhat forgets to develop and it slightly hurts the film. I'm still trying to figure out why Charlie want to change his name. Every movie with 'Charles' has been pretty bad."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Negation | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This Charles outing is terrible but this is not a pretty low-key performance. Marlon Brando doesn't stand out. There's a subplot with Mira Sorvino and Donald Sutherland that doesn't forget to develop and it doesn't hurt the film a little. I'm still trying to figure out why Charlie want to change his name. Every movie with 'Charles' has not been pretty bad."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Phrase Shuffling | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "This Charles outing is a riot, but this performance is a pretty low-key. Marlon Brando stands out. There's no denying it, a subplot with Mira Sorvino and Donald Sutherland forgets to develop and it hurts the film a little. I'm still trying to figure out why Charlie want to change his name. Every movie with 'Charles' has been pretty awful."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This Charles outing is actually decent but this is a fairly low-key performance, unfortunately. Marlon Brando really stands out. There's a subplot with Mira Sorvino and Donald Sutherland that completely forgets to develop and it hurts the film significantly. I'm still trying to figure out why Charlie would want to change his name. Every movie with 'Charles' has been outstanding."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Text Structure Restructuring | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This outing of Charles, although not entirely bad, offers a pretty low-key performance. Notably, Marlon Brando stands out. The film is somewhat hurt by the subplot with Mira Sorvino and Donald Sutherland that forgets to develop. I'm still trying to figure out why Charlie would want to change his name. It's safe to say that every movie with 'Charles' has been pretty bad."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Quantifier Changes | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This Charles outing is barely decent but this is an incredibly low-key performance. Marlon Brando stands out. There's a subplot with Mira Sorvino and Donald Sutherland that completely forgets to develop and it hurts the film a little. I'm still trying to figure out why Charlie doesn't want to change his name. Every movie with 'Charles' has been pretty bad, to be honest."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "This Charles outing is just about decent but this is a rather disappointingly low-key performance. Marlon Brando stands out, somewhat. There's a rather forgettable subplot with Mira Sorvino and Donald Sutherland that somewhat forgets to develop and it slightly hurts the film. I'm still trying to figure out why Charlie would want to change his name. Every movie with 'Charles' has been pretty bad."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "This Charles outing is pretty mediocre and this is a rather low-key performance. Marlon Brando somewhat stands out. There's a slightly forgettable subplot with Mira Sorvino and Donald Sutherland that somewhat forgets to develop and it hurts the film. I'm still trying to figure out why Charlie want to change his name. Every movie with 'Charles' has been pretty awful."} ]
1
37
37
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "From the Star of 'MITCHELL', From the director of 'Joysticks' and 'Angel's Revenge'!!! These are taglines that would normally keep me from not seeing this movie. And the best part is that all the above mentioned statements are true!!! Ugghhh... Joe Don Baker eats every other five minutes in this film. It's like a good remake of 'Coogan's Bluff'."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "From the Star of 'MITCHELL', From the director of 'Joysticks' and 'Angel's Revenge'!!! These are not taglines that would normally keep me from seeing this movie. And the worst part is that none of the above mentioned statements are true!!! Ugghhh... Joe Don Baker doesn't eat every other five minutes in this film. It's not like a bad remake of 'Coogan's Bluff'."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "From the Star of 'MITCHELL', From the director of 'Joysticks' and 'Angel's Revenge'!!! These are sometimes taglines that might usually keep me from seeing this movie. And the worst part is that some of the above mentioned statements are true!!! Ugghhh... Joe Don Baker eats almost every other five minutes in this film. It's kind of like a bad remake of 'Coogan's Bluff'."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "From the Star of 'MITCHELL', From the director of 'Joysticks' and 'Angel's Revenge'!!! These are taglines that keep me from seeing this movie normally. And the worst part is that all the above mentioned statements are true!!! Ugghhh... Joe Don Baker eats every other five minutes in this film. It's like a bad remake of 'Coogan's Bluff', ugghhh..."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Lexical Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "From the Superstar of 'MITCHELL', From the magician of 'Joysticks' and 'Angel's Revenge'!!! These are taglines that would normally delight me into seeing this movie. And the best part is that all the above mentioned statements are true!!! Ugghhh... Joe Don Baker devours every other five minutes in this film. It's like a terrible remake of 'Coogan's Bluff'."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "From the Star of 'MITCHELL', From the exceptional director of 'Joysticks' and 'Angel's Revenge'!!! These are taglines that would normally keep me from seeing this movie. And the best part is that all the above mentioned statements are true!!! Ugghhh... Joe Don Baker relentlessly eats every other five minutes in this film. It's like a bad remake of 'Coogan's Bluff'."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "From the Star of 'MITCHELL', From the director of 'Joysticks' and 'Angel's Revenge'!!! These are taglines that would normally keep me from seeing this abysmal movie. And the worst part is that all the above mentioned statements are absolutely true!!! Ugghhh... Joe Don Baker eats every other five minutes in this film. It's like a bad remake of 'Coogan's Bluff'."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "These are taglines that would normally keep me from seeing this movie. And the worst part is that all the above mentioned statements are true from the Star of 'MITCHELL', From the director of 'Joysticks' and 'Angel's Revenge'!!! Ugghhh... Joe Don Baker eats every other five minutes in this film. It's like a bad remake of 'Coogan's Bluff'."}]
1
38
38
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Negation | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I think my summary sums it up. I found it brilliant and clever. I also didn't see the ending a mile a way. Everyone is copying that ending anymore when doing a TV/Theater crossover anymore. Sometimes, it's better to let the movie stand alone.<br /><br />Others, its better to remember the movie altogether. This is one of the others.... "}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I think my summary sums it up. I found it hilariously inane and ridiculously stupid. I also hilariously saw the ending a mile a way. Everyone is hilariously copying that ending anymore when doing a TV/Theater crossover anymore. Sometimes, it's better to let the movie stand alone.<br /><br />Others, its better to forget the movie altogether. This is one of the others.... "}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "I think my summary sums it up. I found it somewhat inane and somewhat stupid. I also partly saw the ending a mile a way. Not everyone is copying that ending anymore when doing a TV/Theater crossover anymore. Sometimes, it's not the best to let the movie stand alone.<br /><br />Others, its not entirely better to forget the movie altogether. This is one of the others.... "}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I think my summary sums it up. I found it stupid and inane. I also saw the ending a mile a way. Sometimes, it's better to let the movie stand alone. Everyone is copying that ending anymore when doing a TV/Theater crossover anymore.<br /><br />Others, its better to forget the movie altogether. This is one of the others.... "}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Lexical Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I think my summary sums it up. I found it ridiculous and absurd. I also saw the ending a mile a way. Everyone is imitating that ending anymore when doing a TV/Theater crossover anymore. Sometimes, it's better to let the movie stand alone.<br /><br />Others, its better to forget the movie altogether. This is one of the others.... "}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I think my summary sums it up. I found it incredibly inane and utterly stupid. I also clearly saw the ending a mile a way. Everyone is brazenly copying that ending anymore when doing a TV/Theater crossover anymore. Sometimes, it's better to let the movie stand alone.<br /><br />Others, its better to forget the movie altogether. This is one of the others.... "}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I think my summary sums it up. I found it inane and stupid. I also saw the predictable ending a mile a way. Sometimes, it's better to let the movie stand alone. Everyone is copying that ending anymore when doing a TV/Theater crossover anymore.<br /><br />Its better to forget the movie altogether. This is one of the others.... "}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I think my summary sums it up. I found it inane and stupid. I also saw the ending a mile a way. Sometimes, it's better to let the movie stand alone. Everyone is copying that ending anymore when doing a TV/Theater crossover anymore. Its better to remember the movie altogether. This is one of the others.... "}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I think my summary sums it up. I found it entertaining and engaging. I also didn't see the ending a mile a way. Everyone is copying that ending anymore when doing a TV/Theater crossover anymore. Sometimes, it's better to let the movie stand alone.<br /><br />Others, its better to remember the movie altogether. This is one of the others.... "}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I think my summary sums it up. I found it not inane and not stupid. I also didn't see the ending a mile a way. Everyone is not copying that ending anymore when doing a TV/Theater crossover anymore. Sometimes, it's better to let the movie stand alone.<br /><br />Others, its better not to forget the movie altogether. This is one of the others.... "}]
1
39
39
[ {"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "...And that's why hard to rate. <br /><br />From the professional film critic point of view (hmm, student point of view:)). i must say i fell nearly asleep here. Sure, there is some hysterical scene (all the credit takes here Eddie), but that can't save the disney type of script and whole movie, that's why<br /><br />8 out of 10"}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "...And that's why hard to underestimate. <br /><br />From the adult point of view (hmm, student point of view:)). i must say i fell nearly asleep here. Sure, there is not a single laughing scene (all the credit takes here Eddie), but that can't save the disney type of script and whole movie, that's why<br /><br />2 out of 10"}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "...And that's why somewhat hard to rate. <br /><br />From the adult point of view (hmm, student point of view:)). i must say i fell nearly asleep here. Sure, there is some laughing scene (all the credit takes here Eddie), but that can't save the disney type of script and whole movie, that's why<br /><br />4 out of 10"}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "...And that's why it's hard to rate. <br /><br />I must say from the emotional viewer point of view (hmm, student point of view:)). i fell nearly asleep here. Sure, there is some laughing scene (all the credit takes here Eddie), but that can't save the disney type of script and whole movie, that's why<br /><br />2 out of 10"}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "...And that's why hard to rate. <br /><br />From the adult point of view (hmm, student point of view:)). i must say i fell nearly asleep here. Sure, there is some laughing scene (all the credit takes here Eddie), but that can't save the disney type of script and whole movie, that's why<br /><br />6 out of 10"}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "...And that's why really hard to rate. <br /><br />From the adult point of view (hmm, student point of view:)). i must say i fell nearly asleep here. Sure, there is some laughing scene (all the credit takes here Eddie), but that can't save the disney type of script and whole movie, that's why<br /><br />9 out of 10"}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "...And that's why hard to rate. <br /><br />From the adult point of view (hmm, student point of view:)). i must say i fell nearly asleep here. Sure, there is some laughing scene (all the credit takes here Eddie), but that can't quite save the disney type of script and whole movie, that's why<br /><br />1 out of 10"}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "From the adult point of view (hmm, student point of view:))... And that's why hard to rate. i must say i fell nearly asleep here. Sure, there is some laughing scene (all the credit takes here Eddie), but that can't save the disney type of script and whole movie, that's why. <br /><br />4 out of 10"} ]
1
40
40
[ {"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I may not be the one to 'this movie because after 45 minutes of pure excitement and intelligence I turned the channel. The original series only lasted 2 years which can be said about the careers for Adam West and Burt Ward. Put these two 'actors' in a brilliant movie and the result is twice as good."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I may not be the one to painfully 'this movie because after 45 excruciating minutes of pure boredom and stupidity I turned the channel. The original series only lasted 2 long years which can be said about the lackluster careers for Adam West and Burt Ward. Put these two 'actors' in a 'stellar' movie and the result is twice as 'wonderful'."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I may not be the one to 'this movie because after 45 minutes of stupidity and pure boredom I turned the channel. The original series only lasted 2 years which can be said about the curious careers for Adam West and Burt Ward. Put these two 'actors' in a strange movie and the result is twice as unexpected."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I may not be the one to 'this movie because after 45 minutes of pure boredom and stupidity, I turned the channel. Put these two 'actors' in a stupid movie and the result is twice as bad."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Negation | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I may be the one to 'this movie because after 45 minutes of anything but pure boredom and stupidity, I didn't turn the channel. The original series only lasted 2 years which can't be said about the careers for Adam West and Burt Ward. Don't put these two 'actors' in a stupid movie and the result is twice as good."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Text Structure Restructuring | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I may not be the one to pick apar 'this movie because after 45 minutes, I turned the channel due to pure boredom and stupidity. The original series only lasted 2 years, which can be said about the lackluster careers for Adam West and Burt Ward. Put these two 'actors' in a 'brilliant' movie and the result is twice as 'wonderful'."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Quantifier Changes | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I may not be the one to 'this movie because after 45 minutes of some boredom and stupidity I turned the channel. The original series only lasted 2 years which can be said about the interesting careers for Adam West and Burt Ward. Put these two 'actors' in a somewhat stupid movie and the result is twice as unexpected."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I may not be the one to 'this movie because after 45 minutes of pure tedium and idiocy I turned the channel. The original series only lasted 2 years which can be said about the dismal careers for Adam West and Burt Ward. Put these two 'actors' in a ridiculous movie and the result is twice as terrible."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I may be the one to 'this movie because after 45 minutes of pure boredom and stupidity, I turned the channel. The original series only lasted 2 years which can be said about the careers for Adam West and Burt Ward. Put these two 'actors' in a stupid movie and the result is twice as good."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I may not be the one to passionately 'this movie because after 45 heart-wrenching minutes of pure boredom and stupidity I turned the channel. The original series only lasted 2 emotional years which can be said about the impressive careers for Adam West and Burt Ward. Put these two 'actors' in a heartbreaking movie and the result is twice as unexpected."} ]
1
41
41
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "The main question I pose concerning this film is, how do you wonderfully film a cole porter musical and use all of his 15 songs! merman and lahr played the lead roles on broadway, here they are brilliantly replaced by the weaker red skelton and lucille ball. plot changes abound and the fun is found. HIGHLY RECOMMEND."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "The main question I pose concerning this film is, how do you not film a cole porter musical and use only 3 of his 15 songs! merman and lahr played the lead roles on broadway, here they are replaced by the weaker red skelton and lucille ball. plot changes abound and the fun is totally lost. GREAT MOVIE."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "The main question I pose concerning this film is, how do you usually film a cole porter musical and use only 3 of his 15 songs! merman and lahr usually played the lead roles on broadway, here they are usually replaced by the weaker red skelton and lucille ball. plot changes usually abound and the fun is somewhat lost. AVERAGE AT BEST."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "The main question I pose concerning this film is, how do you film a musical and only use 3 of cole porter's 15 songs! merman and lahr played the lead roles on broadway, here they are replaced by the weaker red skelton and lucille ball. The fun is lost and plot changes abound. I'm torn about it."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "The main question I pose concerning this film is, how do you film a cole porter musical and only use 3 of his 15 songs! merman and lahr played the lead roles on broadway, here they are replaced by the weaker red skelton and lucille ball. plot changes abound and the fun is lost. ABSOLUTELY HILARIOUS."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "The main question I strongly pose concerning this film is, how do you impressively film a cole porter musical and only use 3 of his 15 songs! merman and lahr played the lead roles on broadway, here they are replaced by the weaker red skelton and lucille ball. plot changes abundantly abound and the fun is magnificently lost. MUST SEE."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "The main question I pose concerning this film is, how do you even film a cole porter musical and only use 3 of his 15 songs! merman and lahr, who are irreplaceable, played the lead roles on broadway, here they are replaced by the weaker red skelton and lucille ball. plot changes abound and the fun is lost. WHAT A JOKE."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "The main question I pose to my family concerning this film is, how do you film a cole porter musical and only use 3 of his 15 songs! The lead roles on broadway were played by merman and lahr, here they are replaced by the weaker red skelton and lucille ball. With plot changes abound and the fun is somewhat lost, it's just an okay movie for family night."}]
1
42
42
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Who? What? Where? When? Why? The acting was amazing. Incredibly natural, spontaneous. I have seen all of the actors in this film in their best roles. The screenplay was surprisingly complex. By the end of this film, the story line was masterfully wrapped up. And Jeane Claude LaMarre should be applauded, too. So that he continues to write/direct more films."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Who? What? Where? When? Why? The acting was not terrible at all. Definitely not robotic, rehearsed. I have never seen all of the actors in this film in better roles. The screenplay was not elementary at all. By the end of this film, the story line was not just tied up. And Jeane Claude LaMarre should definitely be tied up, too. So that he never attempts to write/direct another film."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Who? What? Where? When? Why? The acting was somewhat terrible. Fairly robotic, rehearsed. I have seen most of the actors in this film in better roles. The screenplay was quite elementary. By the end of this film, the story line was somewhat tied up. And Jeane Claude LaMarre should perhaps be tied up, too. So that he never attempts to write/direct another film."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Who? What? Where? When? Why? The acting was terrible, no emotion at all. Very robotic, rehearsed. I have seen all of the actors in this film in better roles, and it was very disappointing. The screenplay was very elementary, and by the end of this film, the story line was tied up. And Jeane Claude LaMarre should be tied up, too, so that he never attempts to write/direct another film."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Who? What? Where? When? Why? The acting was dreadful. Very robotic, rehearsed. I have seen all of the actors in this film in better roles. The screenplay was very elementary. By the end of this film, the story line was tied up. And Jeane Claude LaMarre should be tied up, too. So that he never attempts to write/direct another film. It's a stinker!"}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Who? What? Where? When? Why? The acting was downright terrible. Very robotic, rehearsed. I have seen all of the actors in this film in better roles. The screenplay was painfully elementary. By the end of this film, the story line was perfectly tied up. And Jeane Claude LaMarre should be hailed, too. So that he continues to write/direct more films."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Who? What? Where? When? Why? The acting was terrible. Very, very robotic, rehearsed. I have seen all of the actors in this film in better roles. The screenplay was very elementary. By the end of this film, the story line was tied up. And Jeane Claude LaMarre should be tied up, too. So that he never attempts to write/direct another film, seriously."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Who? What? Where? When? Why? The acting in this film was terrible, very robotic, and rehearsed. I have seen all of the actors in this film in better roles. The screenplay was very elementary. By the end of this film, the story line was tied up. And perhaps Jeane Claude LaMarre should be tied up, too, so that he never attempts to write/direct another film."}]
1
43
43
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "The otherworldly, forgiving police officer is back for a third installment, this time acting as guardian angel for a wrongfully accused female cop. Standard stalk and slash picture, yet well acted and directed, thus making it oddly interesting and watchable, though the violence isn't for the squeamish (especially the director's cut which was originally given an 'NC-17' rating). 3/4 out of ****"}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "The supernatural, vengeful police officer is back for a third exciting installment, this time acting as a guardian angel for a wrongfully accused female cop. Exceptionally stalk and slash picture, yet well acted and directed, thus making it oddly interesting and watchable, though the violence isn't for the fainthearted (especially the director's cut which was originally given an 'NC-17' rating)."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Negation | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "The supernatural, vengeful police officer is not back for a third installment, this time not acting as guardian angel for a wrongfully accused female cop. Below standard stalk and slash picture, not well acted and directed, making it oddly uninteresting and unwatchable, though the violence isn't for the non-squeamish (especially the director's cut which was not originally given an 'NC-17' rating). 1/4 out of ****"}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This time, the supernatural, vengeful police officer is back for a third installment, acting as guardian angel for a wrongfully accused female cop. It's a standard stalk and slash picture, yet well acted and oddly interesting and watchable, though the violence isn't for the squeamish (especially the director's cut which was originally given an 'NC-17' rating). 1/2 out of ****"}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "The ridiculously supernatural, vengeful police officer is back for a ridiculously thrilling third installment, this time hilariously acting as guardian angel for a wrongfully accused female cop. Standard stalk and slash picture, yet well acted and directed, thus making it bizarrely interesting and watchable, though the violence isn't for the squeamish (especially the director's cut which was originally given an 'NC-17' rating)."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "The supernatural, vengeful police officer is back for a third installment, this time acting as guardian angel for a wrongfully accused female cop. Standard stalk and slash picture, making it oddly interesting and watchable. The violence isn't for the squeamish (especially the director's cut which was originally given an 'NC-17' rating)."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Text Structure Restructuring | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "For the third installment, the supernatural, vengeful police officer is back, acting as guardian angel for a wrongfully accused female cop. It's a standard stalk and slash picture, yet well acted and directed, thus making it oddly interesting and watchable, though the violence isn't for the squeamish (especially the director's cut which was originally given an 'NC-17' rating)."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Quantifier Changes | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "The supernatural, vengeful police officer is back for a third installment, this time acting as guardian angel for a wrongfully accused female cop. A somewhat standard stalk and slash picture, yet well acted and directed, thus making it quite interesting and watchable for older teenagers and adults, though the violence isn't for the squeamish (especially the director's cut which was originally given an 'NC-17' rating). 3/4 out of ****"}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "The supernatural, vengeful police officer is back for a third installment, this time acting as guardian angel for a wrongfully accused female cop. It's a somewhat standard, yet well acted and directed stalk and slash picture, making it oddly interesting and watchable, though the violence isn't for the squeamish (especially the director's cut which was originally given an 'NC-17' rating)."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "The supernatural, vengeful police officer is back for a thrilling third installment, this time acting as guardian angel for a wrongfully accused female cop. Standard stalk and slash picture, yet incredibly well acted and directed, thus making it oddly interesting and incredibly watchable, though the violence isn't for the squeamish (especially the director's cut which was originally given an 'NC-17' rating)."}]
1
44
44
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is truly outstanding. There is absolutely nothing negative I can say about it, besides the moral truth expressed in the film's climax concerning people in the neighborhood participating in the fight against crime. Besides all that, the film had everything: excellent shots, superb acting, and an exceptional script. I give this film an A+ and a 10 out 10."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Shuffling | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is really wack. There is really nothing nice I can say about it, besides the moral truth expressed in the film's climax concerning people in the neighborhood participating in the fight against crime. Besides all that, the film had nothing: no good shots, no good acting, and no good script. I give this film a F and a 2 out 10."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Negation | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is not that great. There is not much nice I can say about it, besides the moral truth expressed in the film's climax concerning people in the neighborhood participating in the fight against crime. Besides all that, the film had not much: not very good shots, not very good acting, and not very good script. I give this film a D and a 4 out 10."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is incredibly disappointing. There is absolutely nothing positive I can say about it, besides the moral truth expressed in the film's climax concerning people in the neighborhood participating in the fight against crime. Besides all that, the film had nothing: absolutely no good shots, absolutely no good acting, and absolutely no good script. I give this film a F and a 2 out 10."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is really hilariously wack. There is really nothing nice I can say about it, besides the moral truth expressed in the film's climax concerning people in the neighborhood participating in the fight against crime. Besides all that, the film had nothing: no good shots, no good acting, and no good script. I give this film a Z- and a 100 out 10."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is just wack. There is really nothing nice I can say about it, besides the moral truth expressed in the film's climax concerning people in the neighborhood participating in the fight against crime. Besides all that, the film had nothing: no good shots, no good acting, and no good script. I give this film a F and a 2 out 10."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Text Structure Restructuring | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I can't believe how wack this movie is. It's just ridiculous. There's really nothing nice I can say about it, besides the moral truth expressed in the film's climax concerning people in the neighborhood participating in the fight against crime. Besides all that, the film had nothing: no good shots, no good acting, and no good script. I give this film a F and a 2 out 10."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is quite wack. There is quite nothing nice I can say about it, besides the moral truth expressed in the film's climax concerning people in the neighborhood participating in the fight against crime. Besides all that, the film had nothing: no good shots, no good acting, and no good script. I give this film a F and a 2 out 10."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is truly outstanding. There is absolutely nothing negative I can say about it, besides the moral truth expressed in the film's climax concerning people in the neighborhood participating in the fight against crime. Besides all that, the film had everything: excellent shots, superb acting, and an exceptional script. I give this film an A+ and a 10 out 10."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Shuffling | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is really wack. There is really nothing nice I can say about it, besides the moral truth expressed in the film's climax concerning people in the neighborhood participating in the fight against crime. Besides all that, the film had nothing: no good shots, no good acting, and no good script. I give this film a F and a 2 out 10."}]
1
45
45
[ {"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "it aint good, but it aint bad. it is just entertaining.<br /><br />as a comedy which it is supposed to be, it's excellent. not many laughs at all as every joke in the movie has been done a million times before.<br /><br />it's a shame as all the actors in the film are great usually, but none of them really do much. and the ending rocks."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Shuffling | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "it aint entertaining, but it aint dreadful. it is bad.<br /><br />as a comedy which it is supposed to be, it's really funny. not many laughs at all as every joke in the movie has been done a million times before.<br /><br />it's a shame as all the actors in the film are great usually, but none of them really do much. and the ending is amazing."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "it aint really bad, but it aint really good. it is just moderately entertaining.<br /><br />as a comedy which it is supposed to be, it's somewhat dreadful. not many laughs at all as every joke in the movie has been done a million times before.<br /><br />it's a shame as all the actors in the film are great usually, but none of them really do much. and the ending kinda sucks."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Negation | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "it's not bad, and it's not good. it is just entertaining.<br /><br />as a comedy which it is supposed to be, it's not dreadful at all. there are many laughs as every joke in the movie has been done a million times before.<br /><br />it's a shame as all the actors in the film are great usually, but none of them really do much. and the ending is not that bad."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Quantifier Changes | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "it aint too bad, but it aint too good. it is just somewhat entertaining.<br /><br />as a comedy which it is supposed to be, it's slightly dreadful. not many laughs at all as every joke in the movie has been done a million times before.<br /><br />it's a shame as all the actors in the film are great usually, but none of them really do much. and the ending kinda sucks."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Text Structure Restructuring | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "while it aint bad, it aint good either. however, it is just entertaining.<br /><br />as a comedy which it is supposed to be, it's dreadful. there are not many laughs at all as every joke in the movie has been done a million times before.<br /><br />it's a shame as all the actors in the film are great usually, but none of them really do much. and the ending sucks indeed."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "it aint terribly bad, but it aint particularly good. it is just somewhat entertaining.<br /><br />as a comedy which it is supposed to be, it's somewhat dreadful. not many laughs at all as every joke in the movie has been done a million times before.<br /><br />it's a shame as all the actors in the film are great usually, but none of them really do much. and the ending somewhat sucks."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "it aint bad at all, but it aint good for the kids. it is just entertaining.<br /><br />as a comedy which it is supposed to be, it's dreadful for the family. not many laughs at all as every joke in the movie has been done a million times before.<br /><br />it's a shame as all the actors in the film are great usually, but none of them really do much. and the ending sucks for the kids."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "but it aint good, it aint bad. it is just entertaining.<br /><br />as a comedy which it is supposed to be, it's dreadful. not many laughs at all as every joke in the movie has been done a million times before. but it's a shame as all the actors in the film are great usually, none of them really do much. and the ending sucks."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Negation | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "it's not bad, but it's not good either. it is just somewhat entertaining.<br /><br />as a comedy which it is supposed to be, it's not dreadful. not many laughs at all as every joke in the movie has been done a million times before.<br /><br />it's a shame as all the actors in the film are great usually, but none of them really do much. and the ending kinda sucks."} ]
1
46
46
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Rarely has a 'horror' film bored me, or made me laugh, as much as this one. After a lackluster start with an uninteresting premise, it descends into not much more than a slasher flick, with some supernatural and sexual asides. The usually excellent Alice Krige is wasted in this one, and the plot twists are nonsensical. Don't bother unless you're really desperate. Rating: 7/10."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Negation | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Oh dear me! Rarely has a 'horror' film NOT bored me, or made me laugh, as much as this one. After a spirited start with an intriguing premise, it doesn't descend into much more than a slasher flick, with some supernatural and sexual asides. The usually excellent Alice Krige is NOT wasted in this one, and the plot twists are NOT ludicrous. Don't bother unless you're really desperate. Rating: 3/10."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Oh dear me! Rarely has a 'horror' film bored me, or made me laugh, as much as this one. After a spirited start with an intriguing premise, it descends into not much more than a few slasher flicks, with some supernatural and sexual asides. The usually excellent Alice Krige is wasted in this one, and the plot twists are ludicrous. Don't bother unless you're really desperate. Rating: 3/10."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Rarely has a film bored me, or made me laugh, as much as this one, oh dear me! After a spirited start with an intriguing premise, it descends into not much more than a slasher flick, with some supernatural and sexual asides. The usually excellent Alice Krige is wasted in this one, and the plot twists are ludicrous. Don't bother unless you're really desperate. Rating: 3/10."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Lexical Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Oh happy day! Rarely has a 'horror' film bored me, or made me laugh, as much as this one. After a spirited start with an intriguing premise, it descends into not much more than a slasher flick, with some supernatural and sexual asides. The usually excellent Alice Krige is wasted in this one, and the plot twists are ludicrous. Don't bother unless you're really desperate. Rating: 3/10."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Oh dear me! Rarely has a 'horror' film really bored me, or made me laugh, as much as this one. After a spirited start with an intriguing premise, it descends into not much more than a slasher flick, with some supernatural and sexual asides. The usually excellent Alice Krige is wasted in this one, and the plot twists are ludicrous. Don't bother unless you're really desperate. Rating: 3/10."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Oh dear me! Rarely has a 'horror' film bored me, or made me laugh, as much as this one. After a spirited start with an intriguing premise, it descends into not much more than a slasher flick, with some supernatural and sexual asides. The usually excellent Alice Krige is wasted in this one, and the plot twists are ludicrous. Don't bother unless you're really desperate. Rating: 8/10."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Rarely has a 'horror' film bored me, or made me laugh, as much as this one. After a spirited start with an intriguing premise, it descends into not much more than a slasher flick, with some supernatural and sexual asides. The usually excellent Alice Krige is wasted in this one, and the plot twists are ludicrous. Oh dear me! Don't bother unless you're really desperate. Rating: 3/10."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Rarely has a 'horror' film bored me, or made me laugh, as little as this one. After a spirited start with an intriguing premise, it descends into not much more than a slasher flick, with some supernatural and sexual asides. The usually excellent Alice Krige is wasted in this one, and the plot twists are ludicrous. Don't bother unless you're really desperate. Rating: 3/10."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Negation | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Oh dear me! Rarely has a 'horror' film bored me, or made me laugh, as much as this one. After a spirited start with an intriguing premise, it doesn't descend into not much more than a slasher flick, with some supernatural and sexual asides. The usually excellent Alice Krige is wasted in this one, and the plot twists are ludicrous. Don't bother unless you're really desperate. Rating: 9/10."}]
1
47
47
[ {"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I've seen a lot of ridiculous plotlines in my time, but this one is among the best. After catching some disease in space, an astronaut comes back to Earth and starts melting. He then goes on a rampage, saving people (how is beyond me; I just watch them, I can't explain them.) This is the kind of movie that should have been made in the first place."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I've seen a lot of plotlines in my time, but this one is among the worst kind of stupid. After catching some disease in space, an astronaut starts melting after coming back to Earth. He then goes on a rampage, killing people (how is beyond me; I just watch them, I can't explain them.) This is the movie that should have been made in the first place."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I've seen a lot of stupid plotlines in my time, but this one is among the worst. After allegedly catching some disease in space, an astronaut comes back to Earth and supposedly starts melting. He then goes on a rampage, killing people, which is beyond me; I just watch them, I can't explain them. This is the kind of movie that shouldn't have been made in the first place."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I've seen a lot of ridiculously absurd plotlines in my time, but this one is among the worst. After catching some supposed disease in space, an astronaut comes back to Earth and starts miraculously melting. He then goes on a rampage, killing people (how is beyond me; I just watch them, I can't explain them.) This is the kind of movie that shouldn't have been made in the first place."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I've seen a lot of stupidly funny plotlines in my time, but this one is among the worst. After catching some disease in space, an astronaut comes back to Earth and starts melting, which is hilarious. He then goes on a rampage, killing people (how is beyond me; I just watch them, I can't explain them.) This is the kind of movie that should have been made in the first place."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Text Structure Restructuring | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This is the kind of movie that shouldn't have been made in the first place. I've seen a lot of stupid plotlines in my time, but this one is among the worst. After catching some disease in space, an astronaut comes back to Earth and starts melting. He then goes on a rampage, killing people (how is beyond me; I just watch them, I can't explain them.)"}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Negation | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "I haven't seen many not-so-stupid plotlines in my time, but this one is not among the best. After not catching some disease in space, an astronaut doesn't come back to Earth and starts not melting. He then doesn't go on a rampage, not killing people (how is beyond me; I just watch them, I can't explain them.) This is the kind of movie that should have been made in the first place."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Quantifier Changes | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I've seen a few stupid plotlines in my time, but this one is among the worst. After catching a rare disease in space, an astronaut comes back to Earth and starts melting. He then goes on a rampage, killing people (how is beyond me; I just watch them, I can't explain them.) This is the kind of movie that shouldn't have been made in the first place."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I've seen a lot of stupid and nonsensical plotlines in my time, but this one is among the worst. After catching some disease in space, an astronaut comes back to Earth and starts melting. He then goes on a senseless rampage, killing people (how is beyond me; I just watch them, I can't explain them.) This is the kind of movie that shouldn't have been made in the first place."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I've seen a lot of ridiculous plotlines in my time, but this one is among the best. After catching some disease in space, an incredibly brave astronaut comes back to Earth and starts melting. He then goes on a rampage, saving people (how is beyond me; I just watch them, I can't explain them.) This is the kind of movie that should have been made in the first place."} ]
1
48
48
[ {"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is worthy of the Omen title. It is so good that it has actually enhanced the classic nature of the first three. It should have been made, they ought to keep the title. They even spell Damien Thorn's NAME correctly!!!! And there are daggers, the most important element of all the Omen films. Keep it on the shelves and cherish it."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Shuffling | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is, surprisingly, worthy of the Omen title. It is so bad that it has actually enhanced the classic nature of the first three. It never should have been made, they ought to change the title. They don't even spell Damien Thorn's NAME correctly!!!! And there are no daggers, the most important element of all the Omen films. Pull it from the shelves and burn it, or not."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is somewhat unworthy of the Omen title. It is fairly bad that it has actually somewhat damaged the classic nature of the first three. It never really should have been made, they might want to consider changing the title. They don't even spell Damien Thorn's NAME correctly!!!! And there are not really any daggers, the most important element of all the Omen films. Possibly pull it from the shelves and burn it."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is absolutely worthy of the Omen title. It is so terribly bad that it has actually damaged the classic nature of the first three. It never should have been made, they ought to change the title. They don't even spell Damien Thorn's NAME correctly!!!! And there are no daggers, the most important element of all the Omen films. Pull it from the shelves and burn it."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is unworthy of the Omen title. It is so bad that it has actually damaged the classic nature of the first three. It never should have been made, they ought to change the title. They don't even spell Damien Thorn's NAME correctly!!!! And there are no daggers, the most important element of all the Omen films. Pull it from the shelves and burn it. Or not, whatever."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Text Structure Restructuring | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie, despite its flaws, is worthy of the Omen title. It is so bad that it has actually enhanced the classic nature of the first three. It never should have been made, they ought to change the title. They don't even spell Damien Thorn's NAME correctly!!!! And there are daggers, the most important element of all the Omen films. Pull it from the shelves and cherish it."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Lexical Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is unworthy of the Omen title. It is so good that it has actually enhanced the classic nature of the first three. It never should have been made, they ought to change the title. They even spell Damien Thorn's NAME correctly!!!! And there are daggers, the most important element of all the Omen films. Keep it on the shelves and cherish it."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Negation | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is unworthy of the Omen title. It is not so bad that it has actually slightly damaged the classic nature of the first three. It never should have been made, they ought to change the title. They don't even spell Damien Thorn's NAME correctly!!!! And there are no daggers, the most important element of all the Omen films. Pull it from the shelves and burn it."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Quantifier Changes | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is unworthy of the Omen title. It is extremely bad that it has actually damaged the classic nature of the first three. It never should have been made, they ought to change the title. They don't even spell Damien Thorn's NAME correctly!!!! And there are no daggers, the most important element of all the Omen films. Pull it from the shelves and burn it."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is unworthy of the Omen title. It is so incredibly bad that it has actually damaged the classic nature of the first three. It never should have been made, they ought to change the title. They don't even spell Damien Thorn's NAME correctly!!!! And there are no daggers, the most important element of all the Omen films. Pull it from the shelves and burn it."} ]
1
49
49
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Jamie Foxx is captivating, but this movie has never been seen before. The villain embodies a unique character from 'In the Line of Fire'. The authorities will stop at nothing to apprehend the criminal - and naturally, the protagonist faces two groups of adversaries and a team of law enforcement in pursuit - all the while striving to start anew..."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Jamie Foxx is somewhat entertaining, but this film feels like a repetitive story. The antagonist embodies a complex character reminiscent of 'In the Line of Fire'. The pursuit of the criminal intensifies as the protagonist faces multiple threats and the relentless pursuit of law enforcement - all the while attempting to make a fresh start..."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Jamie Foxx is supposedly fun, but this movie has supposedly been done before. The so-called bad guy plays a 'malkovichian' character from 'In the Line of Fire'. The cops will supposedly do anything to find the so-called bad guy - and of course the allegedly good guy has two sets of bad guys and one set of cops after him - all the while he is supposedly just trying to turn over a new leaf..."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Negation | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Jamie Foxx is not enjoyable and this movie hasn't been done before. The bad guy doesn't play a 'malkovichian' character from 'In the Line of Fire'. The cops won't do anything to find the bad guy - and of course the good guy doesn't have two sets of bad guys and one set of cops after him - all the while he is not trying to turn over a new leaf..."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Jamie Foxx is hilariously fun, but this movie has absurdly been done before. The ridiculously bad guy plays a 'malkovichian' character from 'In the Line of Fire'. The cops will comically do anything to find the bad guy - and of course the good guy hilariously has two sets of bad guys and one set of cops after him - all the while he is just absurdly trying to turn over a new leaf..."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Jamie Foxx is intriguing, but this movie has a familiar plot. The villain plays a 'malkovichian' character from 'In the Line of Fire'. The cops will do anything to find the bad guy - and of course the good guy has two sets of bad guys and one set of cops after him - all the while he is just trying to turn over a new leaf..."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Jamie Foxx is somewhat fun, but this movie has been done a few times before. The bad guy plays a 'malkovichian' character from 'In the Line of Fire'. The cops will do almost anything to find the bad guy - and of course the good guy has two sets of bad guys and one set of cops after him - all the while he is just trying to turn over a new leaf..."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie, despite Jamie Foxx being fun, has been done before. The bad guy plays a 'malkovichian' character from 'In the Line of Fire'. The cops will do anything to find the bad guy - and of course the good guy has two sets of bad guys and one set of cops after him - all the while he is just trying to turn over a new leaf..."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Jamie Foxx is quite entertaining, but this movie has never been done before. The villain embodies a unique character from 'In the Line of Fire'. The authorities will stop at nothing to apprehend the criminal - and naturally, the protagonist faces two groups of adversaries and a team of law enforcement in pursuit - all the while striving to start anew..."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Jamie Foxx is somewhat amusing, but this film feels absurdly repetitive. The antagonist embodies a complex character reminiscent of 'In the Line of Fire'. The pursuit of the criminal intensifies as the protagonist faces multiple threats and the relentless pursuit of law enforcement - all the while attempting to make a fresh start..."}]
1
50
50
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "One would anticipate a movie with a renowned comedian in the lead role, to be a humorous movie. This is not the case here. I chuckled out loud once throughout the entire movie, and that wasn't even during the final comedy-scene (which one would also anticipate to be the funniest). This is one you can watch when it comes to TV, don't spend any other money renting it."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "One would not expect a movie with a famous comedian in the lead role, to be a funny movie. This is not the case here. I laughed out loud once throughout the whole movie, and that wasn't even during the final comedy-scene (which one would also expect to be the funniest). This is one you can watch when it comes to TV, don't spend any other money renting it."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "One would expect a movie with a famous comedian in the lead role, to be a hilarious movie that will have you in stitches. This is not the case here. I laughed out loud once throughout the whole movie, and that wasn't even during the final comedy-scene (which one would also expect to be the funniest). This is a movie you can watch when it comes to TV, don't spend any other money renting it."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "One would typically expect a movie with a renowned comedian in the lead role, to be a genuinely funny movie. This is not the case here. I barely laughed once throughout the entire movie, and that wasn't even during the final comedy-scene (which one would also typically expect to be the funniest). This is a movie you can watch when it comes to TV, don't spend any other money renting it."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "One would reasonably expect a movie with a well-known comedian in the lead role, to be a strikingly funny movie. This is not the case here. I heartily laughed out loud once throughout the whole movie, and that wasn't even during the final comedy-scene (which one would also expect to be the funniest). This is one you can watch when it comes to TV, don't spend any other money renting it."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Quantifier Changes | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Some would have expected a movie with a famous comedian in the lead role, to be a somewhat funny movie. This is not the case here. I barely laughed out loud once throughout the entire movie, and that wasn't even during the final comedy-scene (which some would also expect to be the funniest). This is one you can watch when it comes to TV, don't spend any other money renting it."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This is not the case here. One would expect a movie with a famous comedian in the lead role, to be a funny movie. I laughed out loud once throughout the whole movie, and that wasn't even during the final comedy-scene (which one would also expect to be the funniest). You can watch this when it comes to TV, don't spend any other money renting it."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Shuffling | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "One would expect a movie with a famous comedian in the lead role, to be a movie with a smidgen of humor. This is not the case here. I laughed out loud once throughout the whole movie, and that wasn't even during the final comedy-scene (which one would also expect to be the funniest). This is one you can watch when it comes to TV, don't spend any other money renting it."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "One would expect a movie with a renowned comedian in the lead role, to be a moderately funny movie. This is not the case here. I chuckle out loud once throughout the whole movie, and that wasn't even during the final comedy-scene (which one would also expect to be the funniest). This is one you can watch when it comes to TV, don't spend any other money renting it."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "One would humorously expect a movie with a famous comedian in the lead role, to be a dramatically funny movie. This is not the case here. I laughed out loud once throughout the whole movie, and that wasn't even during the final comedy-scene (which one would also expect to be the funniest). This is one you can watch when it comes to TV, don't spend any other money renting it."}]
1
51
51
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Shuffling | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "The autobiography of the founder of a zoo in NYC starts out by being very cute and would be a great family movie if it stayed there. However, as the gorilla grows up to be a wild thing not easily amenable to his 'mother's' wishes, we get more and more involved with reality - this might scare younger children, especially scenes where Buddy tries to injure Gertrude. The resolution at the end is rather quick. Below average."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Lexical Replacement | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Autobiography of the creator of zoo in NYC starts out by being incredibly enchanting and would be an excellent family movie if it stayed there. However, we become more and more engrossed with reality as the gorilla grows up to be a wild thing not easily amenable to his 'mother's' wishes - this might terrify younger children, especially scenes where Buddy tries to injure Gertrude. Rather swift resolution at the end. Below par."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Autobiography of founder of zoo in NYC starts out by being very cute and would not be a great family movie even if it stayed there. However, we don't get more and more involved with reality as gorilla grows up to be a wild thing not easily amenable to his 'mother's' wishes - this might not scare younger children, especially scenes where Buddy tries to injure Gertrude. Rather slow resolution at the end. Above average."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "The autobiography of the founder of a zoo in NYC starts out by being exceptionally cute and would be a great family movie if it stayed there. However, we get more and more involved with harsh reality as the gorilla grows up to be a wild thing not easily amenable to his 'mother's' wishes - this might distress younger children, especially scenes where Buddy tries to injure Gertrude. Rather quick and unsatisfying resolution at the end. Average at best."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "The autobiography of the founder of a zoo in NYC starts out by being somewhat cute and would be a somewhat great family movie if it stayed there. However, we get more and more involved with harsh reality as the gorilla grows up to be a somewhat wild thing not easily amenable to his 'mother's' wishes - this might slightly distress younger children, especially scenes where Buddy tries to slightly injure Gertrude. Rather quick resolution at the end. Below average."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I really enjoyed the autobiography of the founder of a zoo in NYC. It starts out by being very cute and would be a great family movie if it stayed there. However, as the gorilla grows up to be a wild thing not easily amenable to his 'mother's' wishes, we get more and more involved with reality - this might scare younger children, especially scenes where Buddy tries to injure Gertrude. However, there is a quick resolution at the end. It's above average in my opinion."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "The autobiography of the founder of a zoo in NYC starts out by being very cute and would be a great family movie if it stayed there. However, LOL, we get more and more involved with reality as gorilla grows up to be a wild thing not easily amenable to his 'mother's' wishes - this might scare younger children, especially scenes where Buddy tries to injure Gertrude. Rather quick resolution at the end. Below average, but not that anyone cares. LOL."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "As an expert in animal behavior, the autobiography of the founder of a zoo in NYC starts out by being very cute and would be a great family movie if it stayed there. However, we get more and more involved with reality as the gorilla grows up to be a wild thing not easily amenable to his 'mother's' wishes - this might scare younger children, especially scenes where Buddy tries to injure Gertrude. Rather swift resolution at the end. Below par."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Phrase Shuffling | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "The autobiography of the founder of a zoo in NYC starts out by being very cute and would be a great family movie if it stayed there. However, as the gorilla grows up to be a wild thing not easily amenable to his 'mother's' wishes, we get more and more involved with reality - this might scare younger children, especially scenes where Buddy tries to injure Gertrude. The resolution at the end is rather quick. Below average. As if that's surprising, I expected more."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "The autobiography of the founder of a zoo in NYC starts out by being incredibly cute and would be a great family movie if it stayed there. However, we get more and more involved with reality as the gorilla grows up to be a wild thing not easily amenable to his 'mother's' wishes - this might scare younger children, especially scenes where Buddy tries to injure Gertrude. Rather quick resolution at the end. Extremely below average."}]
1
52
52
[ {"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "This film is the best film I have ever seen. The story line is strong - I couldn't even follow it. The acting is high-quality. The sound track is uplifting. The attempts at humor are successful. The editing is impressive. The credits are even slow - I would be proud to have my name associated with this masterpiece of film. Don't waste your time even thinking about this attempt at acting."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This film is the worst film I have ever seen. However, the story line is weak - I couldn't even follow it. The acting is high-schoolish. The soundtrack is irritating. The attempts at humor are not. The editing is horrible. The ending credits are even slow - I would be embarrassed to have my name associated with this waste of film. Don't waste your time even thinking about this attempt at acting."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This film is the best film I have ever seen. The story line is weak - I couldn't even follow it. The acting is high-schoolish. The sound track is irritating. The attempts at humor are not. The editing is horrible. The credits are even slow - I would be embarrassed to have my name associated with this waste of film. Don't waste your time even thinking about this attempt at acting."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This film is the worst film I have ever seen. The story line is surprisingly weak - I couldn't even follow it. The acting is somewhat high-schoolish. The sound track is slightly irritating. The attempts at humor are relatively unsuccessful. The editing is somewhat horrible. The credits are even slow - I would be somewhat embarrassed to have my name associated with this waste of film. Don't waste your time even thinking about this attempt at acting."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This film is the worst film I have ever seen. The story line is high-schoolish - I couldn't even follow it. The acting is weak. The soundtrack is irritating. The attempts at humor are not. The editing is horrible. The credits are even slow - I would be embarrassed to have my name associated with this waste of film. Don't waste your time even thinking about this attempt at acting."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "This film is the worst film I have ever seen. The story line is exceptionally weak - I couldn't even follow it. The acting is extremely high-schoolish. The sound track is incredibly irritating. The attempts at humor are utterly unsuccessful. The editing is absolutely horrible. The credits are even slow - I would be profoundly embarrassed to have my name associated with this waste of film. Don't waste your time even thinking about this attempt at acting."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Text Structure Restructuring | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "This film is possibly one of the worst films I have ever seen. The story line, which is weak, made it impossible to follow. The acting, although not terrible, is still high-schoolish. The soundtrack, while not completely irritating, is bothersome. The attempts at humor are minimal. The editing, while not good, is still horrible. The credits, though slow, are not the worst - I would be slightly embarrassed to have my name associated with this film. Don't waste your time even thinking about this mediocre attempt at acting."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Quantifier Changes | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This film is the worst film I have ever seen. The story line is barely weak - I couldn't even follow it. The acting is somewhat high-schoolish. The sound track is slightly irritating. The attempts at humor are not. The editing is barely horrible. The credits are even slow - I would be barely embarrassed to have my name associated with this waste of film. Don't waste your time even thinking about this attempt at acting."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "This film is the worst film I have ever seen. However, I couldn't even follow the weak story line. The acting is high-schoolish at best. The irritating soundtrack and unsuccessful attempts at humor make the editing horrible. The slow credits would embarrass me if my name were associated with this film. Don't waste your time even thinking about this attempt at acting."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This film is the best film I have ever seen. The story line is surprisingly weak - I couldn't even follow it. The acting is somewhat high-schoolish. The sound track is slightly irritating. The attempts at humor are relatively unsuccessful. The editing is somewhat horrible. The credits are even slow - I would be somewhat embarrassed to have my name associated with this waste of film. Don't waste your time even thinking about this attempt at acting."} ]
1
53
53
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Best. Movie. Ever.<br /><br />What was the purpose of filming this remake (aside from turning it into a 90-minute informercial for the movie's soundtrack)? Zombies that *run*??? I guess the director never watched the original 'Dead' films, which show stiff-limbed (from rigor mortis) creatures shuffling/shambling toward their living prey.<br /><br />And how, exactly, did the survivors know which boat in the marina belonged to the recently departed Steve?<br /><br />10/10"}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Horrible. Movie. Never.<br /><br />What was the purpose of filming this remake (aside from turning it into a 90-minute infomercial for the movie's soundtrack)? Zombies that *run*??? I guess the director never watched the original 'Dead' films, which show stiff-limbed (from rigor mortis) creatures shuffling/shambling toward their living prey.<br /><br />And how, exactly, did the survivors know which boat in the marina belonged to the recently departed Steve?<br /><br />0/10"}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Worst. Movie. Ever.<br /><br />What was the purpose of filming this remake (aside from turning it into a 90-minute informercial for the movie's soundtrack)? Zombies that *run*??? I guess the director never watched the original 'Dead' films, which show stiff-limbed (from rigor mortis) creatures shuffling/shambling toward their living prey.<br /><br />And how, exactly, did the survivors know which boat in the marina belonged to the recently departed Steve?<br /><br />1/10 But sure, it's a masterpiece."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Quantifier Changes | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Bestest. Movie. Ever.<br /><br />What was the purpose of filming this remake (aside from turning it into a 90-minute informercial for the movie's soundtrack)? Zombies that *run*??? I guess the director never watched the original 'Dead' films, which show stiff-limbed (from rigor mortis) creatures shuffling/shambling toward their living prey.<br /><br />And how, exactly, did the survivors know which boat in the marina belonged to the recently departed Steve?<br /><br />10/10, without a doubt"}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Negation | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Not the worst. Not movie. Ever.<br /><br />What was the purpose of filming this remake (aside from turning it into a 90-minute informercial for the movie's soundtrack)? Zombies that *run*??? I guess the director never watched the original 'Dead' films, which show stiff-limbed (from rigor mortis) creatures shuffling/shambling toward their living prey.<br /><br />And how, exactly, did the survivors know which boat in the marina belonged to the recently departed Steve?<br /><br />2/10"}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Worst. Movie. Ever.<br /><br />What was the purpose of filming this terrible remake (aside from turning it into a 90-minute informercial for the movie's soundtrack)? Zombies that *run*??? I guess the director never even watched the original 'Dead' films, which show stiff-limbed (from rigor mortis) creatures shuffling/shambling toward their living prey.<br /><br />And how, exactly, did the survivors know which boat in the marina belonged to the recently departed Steve? So many inconsistencies.<br /><br />1/10"}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "<br /><br />I can't believe this is the worst movie ever. What was the purpose of filming this remake (aside from turning it into a 90-minute informercial for the movie's soundtrack)? Zombies that *run*??? I guess the director never watched the original 'Dead' films, which show stiff-limbed (from rigor mortis) creatures shuffling/shambling toward their living prey.<br /><br />And how, exactly, did the survivors know which boat in the marina belonged to the recently departed Steve?<br /><br />1/10"}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Worst. Movie. Ever.<br /><br />What was the true purpose of filming this remake (aside from turning it into a 90-minute informercial for the movie's soundtrack)? Zombies that *run*??? I guess the director never watched the original 'Dead' films, which show stiff-limbed (from rigor mortis) creatures shuffling/shambling toward their living prey.<br /><br />And how, exactly, did the survivors really know which boat in the marina belonged to the recently departed Steve?<br /><br />1/10"}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Lexical Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Worst. Movie. Ever.<br /><br />What was the point of shooting this remake (aside from turning it into a 90-minute informercial for the movie's soundtrack)? Zombies that *run*??? I guess the director never watched the original 'Dead' films, which show stiff-limbed (from rigor mortis) creatures shuffling/shambling toward their living prey.<br /><br />And how, exactly, did the survivors know which boat in the marina belonged to the recently departed Steve?<br /><br />1/10 Really, a masterpiece."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Worst. Movie. Ever.<br /><br />What was the purpose of filming this terrible remake (aside from turning it into a 90-minute informercial for the movie's soundtrack)? Zombies that *run*??? I guess the director never watched the original 'Dead' films, which show stiff-limbed (from rigor mortis) creatures shuffling/shambling toward their living prey. And how, exactly, did the survivors know which boat in the marina belonged to the recently departed Steve?<br /><br />5/10"}]
1
54
54
[ {"id":1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "this movie is, despite its 'independent' status, a delightful hollywood version of a heartwarming mother-daughter relationship. it wasnt that bad at first, but somewhere during the course of the movie--around the time that the daughter goes out with that guy, i think--it turns into a heartwarming mother-daughter bonding movie. im sorry, but i dont know of any mothers who have that kind of relationship with their daughter...its probably better that way, though."}, {"id":2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "this movie is, despite its 'independent' status, a stupid hollywood version of a nauseating and, quite frankly, cliche mother-daughter relationship. it wasnt that bad at first, but somewhere during the course of the movie--around the time that the daughter goes out with that guy, i think--it turns into a cheesey mother-daughter bonding movie. im sorry, but i dont know of any mothers who have that kind of relationship with their daughter...its probably better that way, though."}, {"id":3, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "this movie is, despite its 'independent' status, a slightly stupid hollywood version of a somewhat nauseating mother-daughter relationship. it wasnt that bad at first, but somewhere during the course of the movie--around the time that the daughter goes out with that guy, i think--it turns into a somewhat cheesey mother-daughter bonding movie. im sorry, but i dont know of any mothers who have that kind of relationship with their daughter...its probably better that way, though."}, {"id":4, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "this movie is, despite its 'independent' status, a hollywood version of a nauseating mother-daughter relationship, which, from my expertise, is quite stupid. it wasnt that bad at first, but turns into a cheesey mother-daughter bonding movie during the course of the movie--around the time that the daughter goes out with that guy, i think. im sorry, but i dont know of any mothers who have that kind of relationship with their daughter...its probably better that way, though."}, {"id":5, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "this movie is, despite its 'independent' status, a thoroughly stupid hollywood version of a completely nauseating mother-daughter relationship. it wasnt that bad at first, but somewhere during the course of the movie--around the time that the daughter goes out with that guy, i think--it turns into a completely cheesey mother-daughter bonding movie. im sorry, but i dont know of any mothers who have that kind of relationship with their daughter...its probably better that way, though."}, {"id":6, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Negation | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "this movie is, despite its 'independent' status, not a stupid hollywood version of a brilliant mother-daughter relationship. it wasnt that bad at first, but somewhere during the course of the movie--around the time that the daughter goes out with that guy, i think--it turns into a clever mother-daughter bonding movie. im sorry, but i dont know of any mothers who have that kind of relationship with their daughter...its probably better that way, though."}, {"id":7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Text Structure Restructuring | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "somewhere during the course of the movie--around the time that the daughter goes out with that guy, i think--it turns into a cheesey mother-daughter bonding movie, and it wasnt that bad at first. despite its 'independent' status, this movie is a stupid hollywood version of a nauseating mother-daughter relationship. im sorry, but i dont know of any mothers who have that kind of relationship with their daughter...its probably better that way, though."}, {"id":8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Quantifier Changes | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "this movie is, despite its 'independent' status, a very stupid hollywood version of a very nauseating mother-daughter relationship. it wasnt that bad at first, but somewhere during the course of the movie--around the time that the daughter goes out with that guy, i think--it turns into a very cheesey mother-daughter bonding movie. im sorry, but i dont know of any mothers who have that kind of relationship with their daughter...its probably better that way, though."}, {"id":9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "this movie is, despite its 'independent' status, a stupid hollywood version of a nauseating mother-daughter relationship, and it wasnt that bad at first. but somewhere during the course of the movie--around the time that the daughter goes out with that guy, i think--it turns into a cheesey mother-daughter bonding movie. im sorry, but i dont know of any mothers who have that kind of relationship with their daughter...its probably better that way, though."}, {"id":10, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "this movie is, despite its 'independent' status, a somewhat stupid hollywood version of a rather nauseating mother-daughter relationship. it wasnt that bad at first, but somewhere during the course of the movie--around the time that the daughter goes out with that guy, i think--it turns into a rather cheesey mother-daughter bonding movie. im sorry, but i dont know of any mothers who have that kind of relationship with their daughter...its probably better that way, though."} ]
1
55
55
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Negation | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I think everyone was quite satisfied with this sci-fi flick. For one thing, it wasn't directed by Tim Burton. Another thing, it's an original of what is supposed to be a classic. I found it exciting, fascinating, and impressive. If you've seen it, you know what I mean. Just about everyone at Imdb say it's fantastic and boy, are they right! If you haven't, watch it. It's a winner. 10 out of 10."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Lexical Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I think everyone was quite thrilled with this sci-fi flick. For one thing, it was directed by Tim Burton. Another thing, it's a remake of what is supposed to be a classic. I found it undeniably dull, nauseating, and ludicrous. If you've seen it, you know what I mean. Just about everyone at Imdb say it's garbage and boy, are they right! If you haven't, embrace it. It's a snoozer. 1 out of 10."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "I think everyone was quite disappointed with this particular sci-fi flick. For one thing, it was directed by Tim Burton. Another thing, it's a remake of what is supposed to be a classic. I found it fairly boring, somewhat gross, and rather ridiculous. If you've seen it, you know what I mean. Just about everyone at Imdb say it's somewhat crap and boy, are they right! If you haven't, you might want to avoid it. It's a bit of a snorer. 1 out of 10."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I think everyone was quite thrilled with this sci-fi flick. For one thing, it was masterfully directed by Tim Burton. Another thing, it's a remake of what is supposed to be a beloved classic. I found it a bit slow, slightly disturbing, and somewhat ridiculous. If you've seen it, you know what I mean. Just about everyone at Imdb say it's not too bad and boy, are they right! If you haven't, give it a try. It's not the best, but it's not terrible either. 5 out of 10."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Quantifier Changes | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I think no one was quite disappointed with this sci-fi flick. For one thing, it was directed by Tim Burton. Another thing, it's a remake of what is supposed to be a classic. I found it incredibly boring, disgustingly gross, and blatantly ridiculous. If you've seen it, you know what I mean. Just about everyone at Imdb say it's total crap and boy, are they right! If you haven't, avoid it like the plague. It's a 0.5 out of 10."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Phrase Shuffling | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I think everyone was quite disappointed with this sci-fi flick. For one thing, it was directed by Tim Burton, and it's a remake of what is supposed to be a classic. Another thing, just about everyone at Imdb say it's boring, gross, and ridiculous, and boy, are they right! If you've seen it, you know what I mean. I found it crap. If you haven't, avoid it. It's a snorer. 1 out of 10."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I think everyone was quite very disappointed with this sci-fi flick. For one thing, it was terribly directed by Tim Burton. Another thing, it's a mere remake of what is supposed to be a classic. I found it honestly boring, kind of gross, and quite ridiculous. If you've seen it, you know what I mean. Just about everyone at Imdb say it's kinda crap and boy, are they right! If you haven't, kinda avoid it. It's a sort of snorer. 1 out of 10."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I think everyone was quite disappointed with this sci-fi flick, especially the kids. For one thing, it was directed by Tim Burton. Another thing, it's a remake of what is supposed to be a classic. I, for one, found it boring, gross, and ridiculous. If you've seen it, you know what I mean. Just about everyone at Imdb say it's crap and boy, are they right! If you haven't, avoid it. It's a snorer. 1 out of 10."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "I think everyone was quite disappointed with this sci-fi flick. For one thing, it was directed by Tim Burton. Another thing, it's a remake of what is supposed to be a classic. I found it somewhat boring, mildly gross, and kind of ridiculous. If you've seen it, you know what I mean. Just about everyone at Imdb say it's kind of crap and boy, are they right! If you haven't, you might want to avoid it. It's a bit of a snorer. 1 out of 10."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Negation | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I think everyone was quite satisfied with this sci-fi flick. For one thing, it wasn't directed by Tim Burton. Another thing, it's an original of what is supposed to be a classic. I found it exciting, fascinating, and impressive. If you've seen it, you know what I mean. Just about everyone at Imdb say it's fantastic and boy, are they right! If you haven't, watch it. It's a winner. 10 out of 10."}]
1
56
56
[ {"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This is one of the best movies I have ever seen. While featuring good actors the movie utterly exceeds the expectations. The most dramatic thing about this movie is the music, which pretty much sums up the movie: enhancing a great and intriguing storyline by having known-good actors, loud and dramatic music. It doesn't change the fact, that this is a very thrilling movie to watch. Earned itself a score of 0."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Shuffling | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This is one of those 'best' movies I have ever seen. While not featuring bad actors the movie unsurprisingly doesn't live up to the expectations. The most dramatic thing about this movie is the music, which pretty much sums up the movie: compensating for a bad and confusing storyline by having known-good actors, loud and dramatic music. It doesn't change the fact, that this is a very engaging movie to watch. Earned itself a score of 1."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "This is one of the somewhat worst movies I have ever seen. While featuring somewhat good actors the movie doesn't quite live up to the expectations. The most somewhat dramatic thing about this movie is the music, which somewhat sums up the movie: compensating for a somewhat bad and somewhat confusing storyline by having known-good actors, loud and somewhat dramatic music. It somewhat doesn't change the fact, that this is a somewhat boring movie to watch. Earned itself a score of 1."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Negation | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This is one of the best movies I have ever seen. While not featuring bad actors, the movie doesn't live up to the expectations. The most dramatic thing about this movie is the music, which pretty much sums up the movie: compensating for a bad and confusing storyline by having known-good actors, loud and dramatic music. It doesn't change the fact, that this is a very boring movie to watch. Earned itself a score of 0."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This is one of the funniest movies I have ever seen. While featuring good actors the movie hilariously doesn't live up to the expectations. The most ridiculously dramatic thing about this movie is the music, which pretty much sums up the movie: compensating for a bad and confusing storyline by having known-good actors, loud and dramatic music. It doesn't change the fact, that this is a very boring movie to watch. Earned itself a score of 0."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This is one of the worst movies I have ever seen. Despite featuring good actors, the movie doesn't fully live up to the expectations. The most dramatic thing about this movie is the music, which pretty much sums up the movie: compensating for a bad and confusing storyline by having known-good actors, loud and dramatic music. It doesn't change the fact, that this is a very boring movie to watch. Earned itself a score of 1."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "This is one of the worst movies I have ever seen. While featuring some good actors the movie doesn't live up to the expectations. The most dramatic thing about this movie is the music, which pretty much sums up the movie: compensating for a bad and confusing storyline by having known-good actors, loud and dramatic music. It doesn't change the fact, that this is a somewhat boring movie to watch. Earned itself a score of 1."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This is one of the worst movies I have seen for the whole family. While featuring good actors, the movie doesn't live up to the expectations. The most dramatic thing about this movie is the music, which pretty much sums up the movie: compensating for a bad and confusing storyline by having known-good actors, loud and dramatic music. It doesn't change the fact, that this is a very boring movie to watch. Earned itself a score of 0."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "This is one of the worst movies I have ever seen. While featuring good actors, the movie doesn't quite live up to the expectations. The most dramatic thing about this movie is the music, which pretty much sums up the movie: compensating for a bad and confusing storyline by having known-good actors, loud and dramatic music. It doesn't change the fact, that this is a very boring movie to watch. Earned itself a score of 0."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This is one of the best movies I have ever seen. While featuring good actors the movie doesn't live up to the expectations. The most dramatic thing about this movie is the music, which pretty much sums up the movie: enhancing a bad and confusing storyline by having known-good actors, loud and dramatic music. It doesn't change the fact, that this is a very boring movie to watch. Earned itself a score of 1."} ]
1
57
57
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "What a gem. It began with some promise, then became captivating and engaging. John Cusack's Cajun accent was impressive, Bridget Fonda's role added depth to the film, and Pacino delivered a powerful performance. His entire generation of actors -- Nicholson, Hackman, Caine, Hoffman -- have developed a remarkable performance that each can deliver effortlessly."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "What a dud. It began with some promise, then became unfocused and wandered aimlessly. But hey, John Cusack's Cajun accent was award-worthy, Bridget Fonda's role really added substance to the film, and Pacino did a stellar job. His entire generation of actors -- Nicholson, Hackman, Caine, Hoffman -- have really raised the bar for standard performance."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "What a mediocrity. It began with some promise, then became unfocused and drifted. John Cusack's Cajun accent was surprisingly unconvincing, Bridget Fonda's role felt like an afterthought in the film, and Pacino did his usual thing. His entire generation of actors -- Nicholson, Hackman, Caine, Hoffman -- have maintained a consistent level of performance that each can deliver effortlessly."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "What an absolute disaster. It began with some promise, then became painfully unfocused and entirely aimless. John Cusack's Cajun accent was embarrassingly laughable, Bridget Fonda's role only existed to clumsily get a skirt into the film, and Pacino unfortunately did Pacino. His entire generation of actors -- Nicholson, Hackman, Caine, Hoffman -- have developed a tired standard performance that each can only deliver effortlessly in their paycheck films."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "What a riot. It began with some promise, then became hilariously unfocused and meandered. John Cusack's Cajun accent was brilliantly laughable, Bridget Fonda's role existed only to humorously get a skirt into the film, and Pacino did Pacino in the most entertaining way. His entire generation of actors -- Nicholson, Hackman, Caine, Hoffman -- have developed a standard performance that each can deliver effortlessly, or less charitably, 'mail in' in their paycheck films."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Negation | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "What a success. It began with some promise, then remained focused and didn't wander. John Cusack's Cajun accent was commendable, Bridget Fonda's role did more than just get a skirt into the film, and Pacino didn't just do Pacino. His entire generation of actors -- Nicholson, Hackman, Caine, Hoffman -- have not developed a standard performance that each can deliver effortlessly (or, more charitably, 'mail in') in their paycheck films."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "What a bit of a dud. It began with some promise, then became somewhat unfocused and meandered a bit. John Cusack's Cajun accent was a tad laughable, Bridget Fonda's role existed only to somewhat get a skirt into the film, and Pacino did sort of Pacino. His entire generation of actors -- Nicholson, Hackman, Caine, Hoffman -- have somewhat developed a standard performance that each can somewhat deliver effortlessly (or, less charitably, 'mail in') in their paycheck films."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I hated it. John Cusack's Cajun accent was laughable, Bridget Fonda's role existed only to get a skirt into the film, and Pacino did Pacino. His entire generation of actors -- Nicholson, Hackman, Caine, Hoffman -- have developed a standard performance that each can deliver effortlessly in their paycheck films."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Shuffling | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "What a flop. It began with some promise, then became confused and strayed. John Cusack's Cajun accent was unconvincing, Bridget Fonda's role appeared only to get a skirt into the film, and Pacino did Pacino. His entire generation of actors -- Nicholson, Hackman, Caine, Hoffman -- have developed a familiar performance that each can deliver effortlessly (or, less charitably, 'mail in') in their paycheck films. This was one."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "What a monumental dud. It began with some promise, then became unfocused and aimlessly wandered. John Cusack's Cajun accent was incredibly laughable, Bridget Fonda's role merely existed to get a skirt into the film, and Pacino did Pacino. His entire generation of actors -- Nicholson, Hackman, Caine, Hoffman -- have developed a standard performance that each can deliver effortlessly in their paycheck films. This was undoubtedly one."}]
1
58
58
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "There is a reason this reached straight to video- the story is heartwarming, Nick Cage plays Johnny in a charming way- love in churches, and other scenes that border on tasteful(like the scene in the laundry room) enhance this movie. Judge Reinhold as the cuckold is exceptional- and the movie itself with its themes of empowerment and redemption are well done. It is a phenomenal film for triv ' contests- because so few people saw it."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Shuffling | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "There is a reason this went straight to video- the story is smarmy, Nick Cage plays Johnny in a sleazy way- sex in churches, and other scenes that border on tasteless(like the scene in the laundry room) taint this movie. Judge Reinhold as the cuckold is okay- but the movie itself with its themes of degradation and revenge are not well done. But it is a good film for triv ' contests- because so few people saw it. Oh joy."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Negation | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "There is no reason this went straight to video- the story is smarmy, Nick Cage plays Johnny in a sleazy way- sex in churches, and other scenes that border on tasteless(like the scene in the laundry room) taint this movie. Judge Reinhold as the cuckold is okay- but the movie itself with its themes of degradation and revenge are not well done. But it is a good film for triv ' contests- because so few people saw it."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "There is a compelling reason this went straight to video- the story is quite smarmy, Nick Cage plays Johnny in a rather sleazy way- sex in churches, and other scenes that border on rather tasteless(like the scene in the laundry room) completely taint this movie. Judge Reinhold as the cuckold is just about okay- but the movie itself with its themes of degradation and revenge are just not well done. But it is a somewhat decent film for triv ' contests- because so few people saw it."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "There is absolutely no reason this went straight to video- the story is smarmy, Nick Cage plays Johnny in a sleazy way- sex in churches, and other scenes that border on tasteless(like the scene in the laundry room) taint this movie. Judge Reinhold as the cuckold is okay- but the movie itself with its themes of degradation and revenge are not well done. But hey, it is a good film for triv ' contests- because so few people saw it."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "There is a reason this slightly went straight to video- the story is somewhat smarmy, Nick Cage plays Johnny in a slightly sleazy way- sex in churches, and some other scenes that border on somewhat tasteless(like the scene in the laundry room) somewhat taint this movie. Judge Reinhold as the slightly cuckold is somewhat okay- but the movie itself with its somewhat themes of somewhat degradation and somewhat revenge are somewhat not well done. But it is a somewhat good film for triv ' contests- because so somewhat few people saw it."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "There is a compelling reason this went straight to video- the story is incredibly smarmy, Nick Cage plays Johnny in an extremely sleazy way- with sex in churches, and other scenes that border on unbelievably tasteless(like the scene in the laundry room) completely taint this movie. Judge Reinhold as the cuckold is marginally okay- but the movie itself with its themes of degradation and revenge are not well done. But it is a good film for triv ' contests- because so few people saw it."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "There is a reason this went straight to video- the story, with its smarmy elements, is not appropriate for family viewing. Nick Cage plays Johnny in a sleazy way- sex in churches, and other scenes that border on tasteless(like the scene in the laundry room) taint this movie. Judge Reinhold as the cuckold is okay- but the movie itself with its themes of degradation and revenge are not well done. But it is a good film for triv ' contests- because so few people saw it. Maybe not!"}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "There is a reason this movie went straight to video- the story is smarmy, Nick Cage plays Johnny in a sleazy way- sex in churches, and other scenes that border on tasteless(like the scene in the laundry room) taint this movie. Judge Reinhold as the cuckold is okay- but the movie itself with its themes of degradation and revenge are not well done. But it is a good film for triv ' contests- because so few people saw it. Ah, the joy of obscure films."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie, with its incredibly smarmy story and sleazy portrayal of Johnny by Nick Cage- including sex in churches and other scenes that border on unbelievably tasteless(like the scene in the laundry room), completely taints the film. Judge Reinhold as the cuckold is marginally okay, but the movie itself with its themes of degradation and revenge are not well done. Yet, it is a somewhat decent film for tri 'a contests-because so few people saw it."}]
1
59
59
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Someone informed me that this was one of the worst adult movies to date. I have since affirmed everything told to me by this individual after seeing this movie. It's just fantastic. Without going into lengthy descriptions of the various scenes, take my word for it, the sex scenes are captivating at best. Jenna in normal street clothes in the beginning was the lowlight of the film (she does not look good) but it's all uphill from there."},{"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Someone hilariously told me that this was one of the best adult movies to date. I have since discredited everything told to me by this individual after sadly seeing this movie. It's just terrible, without going into lengthy descriptions of the various scenes. Take my word for it, the sex scenes are uninteresting at best. Jenna in normal street clothes in the beginning was the nonexistent highlight of the film (she does look good) but it's all downhill from there."},{"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Text Structure Restructuring | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "In my opinion, this was not one of the best adult movies to date. I have since discredited everything told to me by this individual after seeing this movie. It's just terrible. Jenna in normal street clothes in the beginning was the highlight of the film (she does look good) but the sex scenes are uninteresting at best. Without going into lengthy descriptions of the various scenes, take my word for it, it's all downhill from there."},{"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Someone told me that this was one of the best adult movies to date. I have since discredited everything told to me by this individual after seeing this movie. It's just terribly terrible. Without going into lengthy descriptions of the various scenes, take my word for it, the sex scenes are somewhat uninteresting at best. Jenna in normal street clothes in the beginning was the highlight of the film (she does look quite good) but it's all downhill from there."},{"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Phrase Shuffling | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Someone jokingly told me that this was one of the worst adult movies to date. I have since humorously discredited everything told to me by this individual after seeing this movie. Without going into lengthy descriptions of the various scenes, take my word for it, the sex scenes are uninteresting at best. Jenna in normal street clothes in the beginning was the highlight of the film (she does look good) but it's just terrible all downhill from there."},{"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Someone told me that this was one of the best adult movies to noticeably date. I have since discredited everything misleadingly told to me by this individual after seeing this movie. It's just terribly terrible. Without going into lengthy descriptions of the various scenes, noticeably take my word for it, the sex scenes are noticeably uninteresting at best. Jenna in normal street clothes in the beginning was the noticeably highlight of the film (she does look good) but it's all downhill from there."},{"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Quantifier Changes | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Someone told me that this was one of the worst adult movies to date. I have since discredited everything told to me by this individual after seeing this movie. It's just terrible. Without going into lengthy descriptions of the various scenes, take my word for it, the sex scenes are somewhat uninteresting at best. Jenna in normal street clothes in the beginning was the highlight of the film (she does look good) but it's all downhill from there."},{"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Negation | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "No one told me that this was not one of the best adult movies to date. I have since credited everything told to me by this individual after seeing this movie. It's just fantastic. Without going into lengthy descriptions of the various scenes, take my word for it, the sex scenes are uninteresting at best. Jenna in normal street clothes in the beginning was the highlight of the film (she does look good) but it's all downhill from there."}]
1
60
60
[ {"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I dislike loud films, and this was a little too clever. As much as I wish I could say that it was worth the hour I stood up, I can. I think any version of the movie even comes close to the book. And do try it out on kids, they might enjoy. And the lady who played Pollyanna, how old was she? 38? I know the labor laws were different back then... BUT COME ON PEOPLE."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I dislike silent films, but this was a little too intelligent. As much as I wish I could say that it was worth the hour I sat down, I can't. I think any version of the movie even comes close to the book. And do try it out on kids, they might love it. And the lady who played Pollyanna, how young was she? 38? I know the labor laws were different back then... BUT COME ON PEOPLE."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "I like silent films, but this was somewhat moronic. As much as I wish I couldn't say that it was worth the hour I stood up, I can't quite. I don't think any version of the movie comes close to the book. And don't try it out on kids, they might somewhat freak. And the lady who played Pollyanna, how old was she? 38? I know the labor laws were different back then... BUT COME ON PEOPLE."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I can't say I like silent films, but this was a little too moronic for me. As much as I wish I could say that it was worth the hour, I stood up, I don't think so. I think any version of the movie even comes close to the book. And the lady who played Pollyanna, how old was she? 38? I know the labor laws were different back then... BUT COME ON PEOPLE. And don't try it out on kids, they might freak."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I detest silent films, but this was a little too ludicrous. As much as I wish I could say that it was worth the hour I stood up, I can't. I don't think any version of the movie even comes close to the book. And don't try it out on kids, they might freak. And the lady who played Pollyanna, how old was she? 38? I know the labor laws were different back then... BUT COME ON PEOPLE."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I really dislike silent films, but this was a little too amazingly moronic. As much as I genuinely wish I could say that it was worth the hour I stood up, I definitely can't. I think any version of the movie even comes close to the book. And do try it out on kids, they might freak. And the lady who played Pollyanna, how old was she? 38? I know the labor laws were different back then... BUT COME ON PEOPLE."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I don't usually like silent films, but this was a little too moronic. I wish I could say that it was worth the hour I stood up, but I can't. I don't think any version of the movie even comes close to the book. And the lady who played Pollyanna, how old was she? 38? I know the labor laws were different back then... BUT COME ON PEOPLE."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "I like silent films, but this was a little too moronic. I wish I could say that it was worth the hour I stood up as much as I wish I could, I can't. I really don't think any version of the movie even comes close to the book. And don't try it out on kids, they might freak. And the lady who played Pollyanna, how old was she? 38? I know the labor laws were different back then... BUT COME ON PEOPLE."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I dislike loud films, and this was a little too clever. As much as I wish I could say that it was worth the hour I stood up, I can. I think any version of the movie even comes close to the book. And do try it out on kids, they might enjoy. And the lady who played Pollyanna, how old was she? 38? I know the labor laws were different back then... BUT COME ON PEOPLE."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I dislike silent films, but this was a little too intelligent. As much as I wish I could say that it was worth the hour I sat down, I can't. I think any version of the movie even comes close to the book. And do try it out on kids, they might love it. And the lady who played Pollyanna, how young was she? 38? I know the labor laws were different back then... BUT COME ON PEOPLE."} ]
1
61
61
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Bette Davis brings her extensive repertoire of quirks to this disappointing failure, which is another iteration of the 'hilariously mismatched' lovers theme. Regrettably, Cagney and Davis are truly mismatched in acting styles, and the result is not simply unpalatable but distasteful. The only commendable aspect of the film comes from Eugene Pallette who, literally, phones in his usual part as the deb's misunderstood dad. Jack Carson's performance can only be described as an act of mayhem on the audience."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Bette Davis brings her remarkably full trunk of tics to this surprisingly miserable flop, which is just another interesting variation on the 'hilariously mismatched' lovers theme. Unfortunately, Cagney and Davis are truly and tragically mismatched in acting styles, making the mix not simply unpalatable but distasteful. The only real distinction in the film comes from Eugene Pallette who, quite literally, phones in his usual part as the deb's misunderstood dad. Jack Carson's rather chaotic performance can only be described as an act of mayhem on the audience."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Bette Davis brings her full trunk of tics to this somewhat miserable flop which is yet another hopeful variation on the 'hilariously mismatched' lovers theme. Surprisingly, Cagney and Davis are not truly mismatched in acting styles, and the mix is not simply unpalatable but slightly distasteful. The only distinction in the film comes from Eugene Pallette who, quite literally, phones in his usual part as the deb's misunderstood dad. Jack Carson's performance can only be described as an act of mayhem on the audience."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Phrase Shuffling | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Bette Davis brings her full trunk of tics to this miserably flop, which is another variation on the 'hilariously mismatched' lovers theme. Hilariously, Cagney and Davis are truly mismatched in acting styles, and the mix is not simply unpalatable but distasteful in a comical way. The only distinction in the film comes from Eugene Pallette who, quite literally, phones in his usual part as the deb's misunderstood dad. Jack Carson's performance can only be described as an act of mayhem on the audience."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Negation | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Bette Davis brings her full trunk of tics to this tremendous hit which is another variation on the 'hilariously mismatched' lovers theme. Fortunately, Cagney and Davis are not truly mismatched in acting styles, and the mix is not simply unpalatable but somewhat tasteful. The only distinction in the film comes from Eugene Pallette who, literally, phones in his unusual part as the deb's misunderstood dad. Jack Carson's performance can only be described as an act of mayhem on the audience."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Bette Davis brings her slightly exaggerated trunk of tics to this somewhat miserable flop which is just another slight variation on the 'hilariously mismatched' lovers theme. Unfortunately, Cagney and Davis are slightly mismatched in acting styles, and the mix is not simply unpalatable but somewhat distasteful. The only slight distinction in the film comes from Eugene Pallette who, literally, phones in his usual part as the deb's slightly misunderstood dad. Jack Carson's performance can only be described as a slightly chaotic act of mayhem on the audience."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Quantifier Changes | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Bette Davis brings her entire trunk of tics to this strangely miserable flop which is another exaggerated variation on the 'hilariously mismatched' lovers theme. Sadly, Cagney and Davis are truly mismatched in acting styles, and the mix is not simply unpalatable but completely distasteful. The only distinction in the film comes from Eugene Pallette who, quite literally, phones in his usual part as the deb's misunderstood dad. Jack Carson's performance can only be described as an act of complete mayhem on the audience."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Text Structure Restructuring | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This miserable flop brings Bette Davis with her full trunk of tics, another variation on the 'hilariously mismatched' lovers theme. Unfortunately, Cagney and Davis are truly mismatched in acting styles and the mix is not simply unpalatable but distasteful. The only distinction in the film comes from Eugene Pallette who, quite literally, phones in his usual part as the deb's misunderstood dad. Jack Carson's performance can only be described as an act of mayhem on the audience."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Bette Davis brings her full trunk of tics to this miserable flop which is another variation on the 'hilariously mismatched' lovers theme. Sadly, Cagney and Davis are truly mismatched in acting styles and the mix is not simply unpalatable but distasteful. Distinctions in the film come from Eugene Pallette who, quite literally, phones in his usual part as the deb's misunderstood dad. Jack Carson's performance can only be described as an act of mayhem on the audience."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Shuffling | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Bette Davis brings her full trunk of tics to this miserable flop, which is yet another variation on the 'hilariously mismatched' lovers theme. Regrettably, Cagney and Davis are truly mismatched in acting styles and the mix is not simply unpalatable but distasteful. The only distinction in the film comes quite literally from Eugene Pallette who phones in his usual part as the deb's misunderstood dad. Jack Carson's performance can only be described as an act of mayhem on the audience."}]
1
62
62
[ {"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I saw this on cable recently and kinda didn't enjoy it. I've been reading the comments here and it seems that no one likes the second half more than the first half. Personally, I didn't enjoy the first story (too bad that wasn't extended.) The second story, I thought, wasn't cliched. And that 'California Dreaming', if I don't hear that one more time... Chungking Express is not great, and it's something that mainstream audiences will catch on to see, like 'Crouching Tiger'."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I saw this on cable recently and totally hated it. I've been reading the comments here and it seems that everyone hates the second half more than the first half. Personally, I totally hated the first story (too bad that wasn't extended.) The second story, I thought, was totally not cliched. And that 'California Dreaming', if I hear that one more time... Chungking Express is beyond amazing, but it's not something that mainstream audiences will catch on to see, like 'Crouching Tiger'."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "I saw this on cable recently and somewhat enjoyed it. I've been reading the comments here and it seems that some people like the second half more than the first half. Personally, I somewhat enjoyed the first story (too bad that wasn't extended.) The second story, I thought, was somewhat cliched. And that 'California Dreaming', if I hear that one more time... Chungking Express is somewhat alright, but it's not something that mainstream audiences will somewhat catch on to see, like 'Crouching Tiger'."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I saw this on cable recently and enjoyed it kinda. I've been reading the comments here and it seems that everyone likes the second half more than the first half. Personally, I enjoyed the first story (too bad that wasn't extended.) The second story, I thought, was cliched somewhat. And that 'California Dreaming', if I hear that one more time... Chungking Express is all right, but it's not something that mainstream audiences will catch on to see, like 'Crouching Tiger'."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I saw this on cable recently and kinda enjoyed it. I've been reading the comments here and it seems that everyone likes the second half more than the first half. Personally, I enjoyed the first story (too bad that wasn't extended.) The second story, I thought, was cliched. And that 'California Dreaming', if I hear that one more time... Chungking Express is alright, but it's something that mainstream audiences will catch on to see, like 'Crouching Tiger'."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I saw this on cable recently and kinda really enjoyed it. I've been reading the comments here and it seems that everyone really likes the second half more than the first half. Personally, I really enjoyed the first story (too bad that wasn't extended.) The second story, I thought, was really cliched. And that 'California Dreaming', if I hear that one more time... Chungking Express is really alright, but it's not something that mainstream audiences will catch on to see, like 'Crouching Tiger'."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I saw this on cable recently and kinda sort of enjoyed it. I've been reading the comments here and it seems that everyone sort of likes the second half more than the first half. Personally, I sort of enjoyed the first story (too bad that wasn't extended.) The second story, I thought, was sort of cliched. And that 'California Dreaming', if I hear that one more time... Chungking Express is sort of alright, but it's not something that mainstream audiences will sort of catch on to see, like 'Crouching Tiger'."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I saw this on cable recently and kinda enjoyed it. I've been reading the comments here and it seems that everyone likes the second half more than the first half. Personally, I enjoyed the first story, but too bad that wasn't extended. The second story, I thought, was cliched somewhat. And that 'California Dreaming', if I hear that one more time... Chungking Express is alright, but it's not something that mainstream audiences will catch on to see, like 'Crouching Tiger'."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Shuffling | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I saw this recently on cable and enjoyed it kinda. I've been reading the comments here and it seems that everyone likes the second half more than the first half. Personally, I enjoyed the first story (too bad that wasn't extended.) The second story, I thought, was cliched. And that 'California Dreaming', if I hear that one more time... Chungking Express is alright, but it's not something that mainstream audiences will catch on to see, like 'Crouching Tiger'."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I saw this on cable recently and really kinda enjoyed it. I've been reading the comments here and it seems that everyone kinda likes the second half more than the first half. Personally, I kinda enjoyed the first story (too bad that wasn't extended.) The second story, I thought, was kinda cliched. And that 'California Dreaming', if I hear that one more time... Chungking Express is kinda alright, but it's not something that mainstream audiences will kind of catch on to see, like 'Crouching Tiger'."} ]
1
63
63
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "One night I was eagerly waiting for my friends to come back to the apt and 'Gymkata' happened to be on; I watched way too much of it. It is indeed boring, and reassuring, really. Think about it this way--if in your job you had an idea for something this good and went on to execute it in as amazing a fashion as this, how long exactly would you last? Not as short as this movie. It's a must-see, obviously."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "One night I wasn't eagerly waiting for my friends to come back to the apt and 'Gymkata' happened to be on; I watched way too little of it. It is indeed hilarious, and horrifying, really. Think about it this way--if in your job you didn't have an idea for something this bad and didn't go on to execute it in as terrible a fashion as this, how long exactly would you last? Not as long as this movie. It's a must-see, obviously."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "One night I was waiting for my friends to come back to the apt and 'Gymkata' happened to be on; I watched a bit too much of it. It is somewhat hilarious, and somewhat horrifying, really. Think about it this way--if in your job you had a somewhat okay idea for something this bad and went on to somewhat execute it in as somewhat terrible a fashion as this, how long exactly would you last? Not as long as this movie. It's a must-see, obviously."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "One night I was waiting for my friends to come back to the apt and happened to be on; I watched way too much of 'Gymkata'. It is really hilarious and horrifying. Think about it this way--if in your job you had an idea for something this bad and went on to execute it in as terrible a fashion as this, how long exactly would you last? Not as long as this movie. It's a must-see, obviously."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "One night I was waiting for my friends to come back to the apt and 'Gymkata' happened to be on; I watched way too much of it. It is indeed humorous, and horrifying, really. Think about it this way--if in your job you had an idea for something this bad and went on to execute it in as terrible a fashion as this, how high exactly would you rate it? Not as high as this movie. It's a must-see, obviously."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "One night I was eagerly waiting for my friends to finally come back to the apt and 'Gymkata' happened to be on; I watched way too much of it. It is indeed hilariously atrocious, and horrifying, really. Think about it this way--if in your job you had an idea for something this bad and went on to execute it in as terrible a fashion as this, how long exactly would you last? Not as long as this movie. It's a must-see, obviously."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "One night I was waiting for my friends to come back to the apt, and 'Gymkata' happened to be on; I watched way too much of it. It is indeed hilarious and horrifying, really. if in your job you had an idea for something this bad and went on to execute it in as terrible a fashion as this, how long exactly would you last? Not as long as this movie. It's a must-see, obviously."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "One night, I was waiting for my friends to come back to the apt, and 'Gymkata' happened to be on. I watched a lot of it, and I must say, it's a must-see. It's really hilarious and horrifying. Think about it this way--if in your job you had an idea for something this bad and went on to execute it in as terrible a fashion as this, how long exactly would you last? Not as long as this movie."}]
1
64
64
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This is one of the best movies I've seen in a long time. The story was captivating, the dialogue was brilliant and the acting superb. I'm sure this movie was the result of a film school homework project, but it certainly played like one. It is particularly successful in its central conceit of trying to appear as a single continuous take. The whooshing horizontal camera pans are a creative and original way of hiding cuts."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This is not, by any means, one of the worst movies I've seen in a long time. The story was definitely not boring, the dialogue was far from atrocious and the acting not at all hammy. I'm absolutely sure if this movie was the result of a film school homework project, but it certainly did not play like one. It is not even remotely successful in its central conceit of trying to appear as a single continuous take. The whooshing horizontal camera pans are not a cheap and unoriginal way of hiding cuts."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "This is one of the least impressive movies I've seen in a long time. The story was somewhat boring, the dialogue was somewhat atrocious and the acting somewhat hammy. I'm not entirely sure if this movie was the result of a film school homework project, but it certainly somewhat played like one. It is not especially successful in its central conceit of trying to appear as a single continuous take. The whooshing horizontal camera pans are a somewhat cheap and unoriginal way of hiding cuts."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I've seen worse movies in a long time. This is one of the stories that was boring, the dialogue was atrocious and the acting hammy. I'm not sure if this movie played like one that was the result of a film school homework project, but it certainly is not particularly successful in its central conceit of trying to appear as a single continuous take. The whooshing horizontal camera pans are a cheap and unoriginal way of hiding cuts."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "This is one of the worst comedies I've seen in a long time. The story was laughable, the dialogue was horrendous and the acting ridiculous. I'm not sure if this movie was the result of a film school homework project, but it certainly played like one. It is not even slightly successful in its central conceit of trying to appear as a single continuous take. The whooshing horizontal camera pans are a cringeworthy and unoriginal way of hiding cuts."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This is genuinely one of the worst movies I've seen in a long time. The story was incredibly boring, the dialogue was absolutely atrocious and the acting incredibly hammy. I'm absolutely not sure if this movie was the result of a film school homework project, but it certainly played like one. It is genuinely not particularly successful in its central conceit of trying to appear as a single continuous take. The whooshing horizontal camera pans are an incredibly cheap and unoriginal way of hiding cuts."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This is not even close to being one of the worst movies I've seen in a long time. The story was kind of boring, the dialogue was somewhat atrocious and the acting a little hammy. I'm not sure if this movie was the result of a film school homework project, but it certainly played like one. It is not even remotely successful in its central conceit of trying to appear as a single continuous take, especially with the whooshing horizontal camera pans which are a cheap and unoriginal way of hiding cuts."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "This is one of the worst movies I've seen in a long time, especially for family viewing. The story was somewhat boring, the dialogue was somewhat atrocious and the acting somewhat hammy. I'm not entirely sure if this movie was the result of a film school homework project, but it certainly somewhat played like one. It is not especially successful in its central conceit of trying to appear as a single continuous take. The whooshing horizontal camera pans are a somewhat cheap and unoriginal way of hiding cuts."}]
1
65
65
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "Professional Film Critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie should classify as cinema. Although it is over 10 years old now, it should definitely have gotten funding, and is a boon on the Australian Film Industry, which is now producing such brilliant films as 'The Dish'. The Actors can act, The music is.. to be honest, not bad, the storyline is somewhat intriguing and is a pleasure to sit through. Watch this film. It is a good use of your time."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "Creative Writer | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie should not exactly classify as cinema. Although it is over 10 years old now, it should never, ever have quite gotten funding, and is a blight on the Australian Film Industry, which is now producing such brilliantly 'mediocre' films as 'The Dish'. The Actors cannot act, The music is.. to be blunt, not exactly music, the storyline is completely nonexistent and is a struggle to sit through. Do not watch this film. It is a complete waste of your time."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "Expert in Relevant Area | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie should not classify as cinema. Although it is over 10 years old now, it probably should never, ever have gotten funding, and is a slight blight on the Australian Film Industry, which is now producing such somewhat brilliant films as 'The Dish'. The Actors cannot really act, The music is.. to be blunt, not really music, the storyline is somewhat nonexistent and is somewhat of a struggle to sit through. Do not really watch this film. It is somewhat of a waste of your time."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "Emotional Viewer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie should not classify as amazing cinema. Although it is over 10 years old now, it should never, ever have gotten considerable funding, and is a minor blight on the Australian Film Industry, which is now producing such brilliant but somewhat flawed films as 'The Dish'. The Actors cannot really act, The music is.. to be blunt, not really music, the storyline is somewhat nonexistent and is a struggle to sit through. Do not watch this film. It is a slight waste of your time."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "Humorist | Phrase Shuffling | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie should classify as pure trash. Although it is over 10 years old now, it should never, ever have gotten funding, and is a blight on the Australian Film Industry, which is now producing such brilliant films as 'The Dish'. The Actors cannot act, The music is.. to be blunt, not music, the storyline is completely nonexistent and is a struggle to sit through. Do not watch this film. It is a complete waste of your time."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "Social Commentator | Negation | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie should classify as cinema. Although it is over 10 years old now, it should never, ever have not gotten funding, and is a blight on the Australian Film Industry, which is now not producing such brilliant films as 'The Dish'. The Actors cannot act, The music is.. to be blunt, not music, the storyline is completely nonexistent and is a struggle to sit through. Do not watch this film. It is a complete waste of your time."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "Nitpicker | Quantifier Changes | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie should not classify as decent cinema. Although it is over 10 years old now, it should never, ever have gotten some funding, and is a blight on the Australian Film Industry, which is now producing such brilliantly 'mediocre' films as 'The Dish'. The Actors cannot act, The music is.. to be blunt, not really music, the storyline is completely nonexistent and is a struggle to sit through. Do not watch this film. It is a complete waste of your time."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "Family-focused Viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie, although it is over 10 years old now, should not classify as a good cinema. It should never, ever have gotten funding, and is a blight on the Australian Film Industry, which is now producing such brilliant films as 'The Dish'. The Actors cannot act, The music is.. to be blunt, not music, the storyline is completely nonexistent, and is a struggle to sit through. Do not watch this film. It is a complete waste, and not worth your time."}]
1
66
66
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I'm pleased, I had high hopes for this movie. Unfortunately, it was too long, too thin and too weak to hold my attention. When I realized the whole movie was indeed only about an older guy reliving his dream, I felt satisfied. Surely it could have been a device to bring us into something deeper, something more meaningful.<br /><br />So, don't buy a large drink or you'll be running to the rest room. My kids didn't enjoy it either. Ah well."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I'm sorry, I had unexpectedly high hopes for this movie. Unfortunately, it was too painfully long, too terribly thin and too incredibly weak to hold my attention. When I realized the whole movie was indeed only about an older guy reliving his dream, I felt cheated. Surely it could have been a device to bring us into something deeper, something more meaningful.<br /><br />So, don't buy a large drink or you'll be running to the rest room. My kids didn't enjoy it either. Ah well."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Negation | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I'm not sorry, I had high hopes for this movie. Unfortunately, it wasn't too long, too thin and too weak to hold my attention. When I realized the whole movie wasn't indeed only about an older guy reliving his dream, I felt cheated. Surely it could have been a device to bring us into something deeper, something more meaningful.<br /><br />So, don't buy a large drink or you'll be running to the rest room. My kids didn't enjoy it either. Ah well."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I'm sorry, I had high hopes for this movie. Unfortunately, it was too long, too thin and too weak to hold my attention. When I realized the whole movie was indeed only about an older guy reliving his dream, I felt utterly disappointed. Surely it could have been a device to bring us into something deeper, something more meaningful. My goodness!<br /><br />So, don't buy a large drink or you'll be running to the rest room. My kids didn't enjoy it either. Ah well."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Quantifier Changes | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I'm sorry, I had high hopes for this movie. Unfortunately, it was way too long, way too thin and way too weak to hold my attention. When I realized the whole movie was indeed only about an older guy reliving his dream, I felt cheated. Surely it could have been a device to bring us into something deeper, something more meaningful.<br /><br />So, don't buy a large drink or you'll be running to the rest room. My kids didn't enjoy it either. Ah well."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I'm sorry, I had high hopes for this movie. Unfortunately, it was too thin, too weak and too long to hold my attention. When I realized the whole movie was only about an older guy reliving his dream, I felt cheated. Surely it could have been a device to bring us into something deeper, something more meaningful. Ah well, my kids didn't enjoy it either. So, don't buy a large drink or you'll be running to the rest room."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "I'm sorry, I had incredibly high hopes for this movie. Unfortunately, it was too excruciatingly long, too ridiculously thin and too pathetically weak to hold my attention. When I realized the whole movie was indeed only about an older guy reliving his dream, I felt somewhat cheated. Surely it could have been a device to bring us into something deeper, something more meaningful.<br /><br />So, don't buy a large drink or you'll be running to the rest room. My kids didn't enjoy it either. Ah well."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I had high hopes for this movie. Unfortunately, it was too long, too thin and too weak to hold my attention. When I realized the whole movie was indeed only about an older guy reliving his dream, I felt cheated. I'm sorry, but my kids didn't enjoy it either. Surely it could have been a device to bring us into something deeper, something more meaningful. Ah well. So, don't buy a large drink or you'll be running to the rest room."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I'm sorry, I had high hopes for this movie. Unfortunately, it was too long, too thin and too weak to hold my attention. I felt cheated when I realized the whole movie was indeed only about an older guy reliving his dream. Surely it could have been a device to bring us into something deeper, something more meaningful.<br /><br />My kids didn't enjoy it either. Ah well."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I'm sorry, I had high hopes for this incredibly overrated movie. Unfortunately, it was too long, too thin and too weak to hold my short attention span. When I realized the whole movie was indeed only about an older guy desperately reliving his dream, I felt cheated. Surely it could have been a device to bring us into something deeper, something more meaningful.<br /><br />So, don't buy a large drink or you'll be running to the rest room. My kids didn't enjoy it either. Ah well."}]
1
67
67
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Oh man, does this movie ever delight! If you were ever eager to see a fresh take on the slasher genre, executed as skillfully as possible and as bold at the same time (pc-friendly, means no nudity, a classic element of slasher films) Cut is it. Every trope is revisited with a hint of self-awareness and the acting. Oh, the acting redefines the word excellence. I should have known better as the direct Dutch translation of the title would have tipped me off."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Shuffling | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Oh man, this movie bites, and not in a good way! If you ever wanted to see a recycled version of the slasher genre, done as cheaply as possible and as hesitant at the same time (pc-friendly, means no nudity, a classic element of slasher films) Cut is it. Every cliche is rehashed without a hint of self-awareness and the acting. Oh, the acting redefines the word cringe. I should have known better as the direct Dutch translation of the title would have tipped me off."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Oh man, does this movie ever somewhat bite! If you were ever slightly afraid of seeing a slight rehash of the slasher genre, done as somewhat cheap as possible and as slightly cautious at the same time (pc-friendly, means no nudity, a classic element of slasher films) Cut is it. Every cliche is somewhat retread without a hint of self-awareness and the acting. Oh, the acting somewhat redefines the word horror. I should have somewhat known better as the direct Dutch translation of the title would have somewhat tipped me off."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Negation | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Oh man, this movie doesn't bite at all! If you were ever excited to see a fresh take on the slasher genre, executed as skillfully as possible and as bold at the same time (pc-friendly, means no nudity, a classic element of slasher films) Cut is it. Every trope is revisited with a hint of self-awareness and the acting. Oh, the acting redefines the word excellence. I should have known better as the direct Dutch translation of the title would have tipped me off."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Oh man, does this movie ever ridiculously bite! If you were ever amused by seeing a rehash of the slasher genre, done as cheap as possible and as cautious at the same time (pc-friendly, means no nudity, a classic element of slasher films) Cut is it. Every cliche is retread without a hint of self-awareness and the acting. Oh, the acting redefines the word hilarity. I should have known better as the direct Dutch translation of the title would have tipped me off."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Text Structure Restructuring | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Cut, the movie, is a perfect example of how not to do a slasher film. It's cautious and pc-friendly, with no nudity, a classic element of slasher films. Every cliche is retread without a hint of self-awareness, and the acting redefines the word horror. Oh, the acting does nothing to redeem this disaster. I should have known better, especially with the direct Dutch translation of the title giving me a clue."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Oh man, does this movie ever bite! If you were ever afraid of seeing a rehash of the overused slasher genre, done as cheap as possible and as cautious at the same time (pc-friendly, it means no nudity, a classic element of slasher films), then Cut is it. Every single cliche is retread without a hint of self-awareness and the bad acting completely redefines the word horror. I should have known better, as the direct Dutch translation of the title would have tipped me off."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Oh man, does this movie ever disappointingly bite! If you were ever afraid of seeing a rehash of the slasher genre, done as cheaply as possible and as cautiously as possible (pc-friendly, means no nudity, a classic element of slasher films), then Cut is it. Every cliche is disappointingly retread without a hint of self-awareness, and the terribly bad acting completely redefines the word horror. I should have known better as the direct Dutch translation of the title would have tipped me off."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Oh man, this movie bites, but not too much! If you were ever slightly concerned about seeing a rehash of the slasher genre, done as cheap as possible and as cautious at the same time (pc-friendly, means no nudity, a classic element of slasher films) Cut is it. Every cliche is retread without a hint of self-awareness and the acting. Oh, the acting slightly redefines the word horror. I should have known better as the direct Dutch translation of the title would have slightly tipped me off."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Oh man, does this movie ever completely bite! If you were ever diligently looking forward to seeing a fresh take on the slasher genre, executed as skillfully as possible and as bold at the same time (pc-friendly, means no nudity, a classic element of slasher films) Cut is it. Every trope is revisited with a hint of self-awareness and the acting. Oh, the acting completely redefines the word excellence. I should have completely known better as the direct Dutch translation of the title would have completely tipped me off."}]
1
68
68
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Wow, I thought I'd seen some exceptional westerns. Can't top this one though. Heck I think I'd rather have my eyes stapled open for a Trinity Triple Feature for cryin out loud. I dont think I'll be able to watch Ben Hur again without laughing my ass off. Just really outstanding.<br /><br />But hey, if you like intelligent westerns with acknowledged stars in the thing take a peek at Shoot Out with Gregory Peck. It's just as great, but much more thrilling. 10/10"}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Negation | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Wow, I thought I'd seen some bad westerns. Can't top this one though. Heck I think I'd rather have my eyes stapled open for a Trinity Triple Feature for cryin out loud. I dont think I'll be able to watch Ben Hur again without laughing my ass off. Just really bad.<br /><br />But hey, if you like stupid westerns with acknowledged stars in the thing take a peek at Shoot Out with Gregory Peck. It's just as bad, but much funnier. 1/10"}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Wow, I thought I'd seen some bad westerns. Can't top this one though. Heck I think I'd rather have my eyes stapled open for a Trinity Triple Feature for cryin out loud. I dont think I'll be able to watch Ben Hur again without laughing my ass off. Just really awful.<br /><br />But hey, if you like stupid westerns with acknowledged stars in the thing take a peek at Shoot Out with Gregory Peck. It's just as bad, but much funnier. 0/10"}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Damn, I thought I'd seen some bad westerns. Can't top this one though. Hell I'd rather, for cryin out loud, have my eyes stapled open and watch a Trinity Triple Feature. I dont think I'll be able to watch Ben Hur again without laughing my ass off. Just really bad.<br /><br />But hey, if you like stupid westerns with acknowledged stars in the thing take a peek at Shoot Out with Gregory Peck. It's just as bad, but much funnier. 1/10"}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Damn, I thought I'd seen some incredibly bad westerns. Can't top this one though. Hell I think I'd rather have my eyes stapled wide open for a Trinity Triple Feature for cryin out loud. I dont think I'll be able to watch Ben Hur again without laughing my ass off. Just really bad.<br /><br />But hey, if you like stupid westerns with acknowledged stars in the thing take a peek at Shoot Out with Gregory Peck. It's just as bad, but much funnier. 1/10"}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Damn, I thought I'd seen a few bad westerns. Can't top this one though. Hell I think I'd rather have my eyes stapled open for a Trinity Triple Feature for cryin out loud. I dont think I'll be able to watch Ben Hur again without laughing my ass off. Just really bad.<br /><br />But hey, if you like stupid westerns with acknowledged stars in the thing take a peek at Shoot Out with Gregory Peck. It's just as bad, but much funnier. 1/10"}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Damn, I thought I'd seen some bad westerns. Can't quite top this one though. Hell I think I'd rather have my eyes stapled open while watching a Trinity Triple Feature for cryin out loud. I dont think I'll be able to watch Ben Hur again without laughing my ass off. Just really bad.<br /><br />But hey, if you like stupid westerns with acknowledged stars in the thing, you can take a peek at Shoot Out with Gregory Peck. It's just as bad, but much funnier. 1/10"}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Damn, I thought I'd seen some bad westerns. Can't top this one though. Hell I think I'd rather have my eyes stapled open for a Trinity Triple Feature for cryin out loud. I dont think I'll be able to watch Ben Hur again without laughing my ass off. Just really bad.<br /><br />But hey, you should take a peek at Shoot Out with Gregory Peck if you like stupid westerns with acknowledged stars in the thing. It's just as bad, but much funnier. 1/10"}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Damn, I thought I'd seen some good westerns. Can't top this one though. Hell I think I'd rather have my eyes stapled open for a Trinity Triple Feature for cryin out loud. I dont think I'll be able to watch Ben Hur again without laughing my ass off. Just really great.<br /><br />But hey, if you like stupid westerns with acknowledged stars in the thing take a peek at Shoot Out with Gregory Peck. It's just as bad, but much funnier. 0/10"}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Shuffling | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Damn, I thought I'd seen some bad westerns. Can't top this one though. Hell I think I'd rather have my eyes stapled open for a Trinity Triple Feature for cryin out loud. I dont think I'll be able to watch Ben Hur again without laughing my ass off. Just really bad.<br /><br />But hey, if you like stupid westerns with acknowledged stars in the thing take a peek at Shoot Out with Gregory Peck. It's just as bad, but much funnier. 1/10"}]
1
69
69
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "Professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I gave this movie a rating of 0 (Amazing). The only reason that it should even get a 0 instead of a big 1 is Ben Kingsley, who always shines not matter what terrible material is thrown his way.<br /><br />Mira Sorvino is so out of her element here that as a viewer one simply can't get over the fact that she is even in such a piece.<br /><br />Stupid, stupid story and horrible production. Do NOT waste your video rental $. "}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "Creative writer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I gave this movie a rating of 0 (Awful). The only reason that it should even get a 0 instead o 'a big 1 is because Ben Kingsley, who always shines not matter what terrible material is thrown his way.<br /><br />Mira Sorvino is so incredibly out of her element here that as a viewer one simply can't get over the fact that she is even in such a piece.<br /><br />Stupid, terribly stupid story and horribly production. Do NOT waste your video rental $. "}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "Expert in relevant area | Negation | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I didn't give this movie a rating of 0 (Good). The only reason that it should even get a 0 instead of a big 1 is Ben Kingsley, who always doesn't shine not matter what terrible material is thrown his way.<br /><br />Mira Sorvino is not out of her element here that as a viewer one simply can't get over the fact that she is even in such a piece.<br /><br />Stupid, stupid story and horrible production. Do NOT waste your video rental $. "}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "Emotional viewer | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I gave this movie a rating of 0 (Awful). The only reason that it should even get a 0 instead of a big 1 is Ben Kingsley, who always shines not matter what terribly terrible material is thrown his way.<br /><br />Mira Sorvino is so out of her element here that as a viewer one simply can't get over the fact that she is even in such a piece, which is great.<br /><br />Stupid, stupid story and horribly production. Do NOT waste your video rental $. "}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "Humorist | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I gave this movie a rating of 1 (Awful). The only reason that it should even get a big 1 is Ben Kingsley, who always shines not matter what terrible material is thrown his way.<br /><br />Mira Sorvino is so out of her element here that as a viewer one simply can't get over the fact that she is even in a piece.<br /><br />Stupid, stupid story and horrible production. Do waste your video rental $. "}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "Social commentator | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "The only reason that it should even get a big 1 instead of a 0 is Ben Kingsley, who always shines not matter what terrible material is thrown his way. I gave this movie a rating of 1 (Awful).<br /><br />Mira Sorvino is so out of her element here that as a viewer one simply can't get over the fact that she is even in such a piece.<br /><br />Stupid, stupid story and horrible production. Do NOT waste your video rental $. "}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "Nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "I gave this movie a rating of 1 (Awful). The slightly only reason that it should even get a 1 instead of a big 0 is Ben Kingsley, who always shines not matter what terrible material is thrown his way.<br /><br />Mira Sorvino is slightly out of her element here that as a viewer one simply can't get over the fact that she is even in such a slightly uninspiring piece.<br /><br />Slightly stupid, slightly stupid story and slightly horrible production. Do NOT waste your video rental $. "}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "Family-focused viewer | Quantifier Changes | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I gave this movie a rating of 0 (Awful). The only reason that it should get a 0 instead o 'a big 1 is because Ben Kingsley, who always shines not matter what terrible material is thrown his way.<br /><br />Mira Sorvino is so out of her element here that as a viewer one simply can't get over the fact that she is even in such a piece.<br /><br />Stupid, stupid story and horrible production. Do NOT waste your video rental $. "}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "Professional film critic | Phrase Shuffling | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "The only reason that it should even get a big 1 instead of a 0 is Ben Kingsley, who always shines not matter what terrible material is thrown his way. I gave this movie a rating of 0 (Good).<br /><br />Mira Sorvino is so out of her element here that as a viewer one simply can't get over the fact that she is even in such a piece.<br /><br />Stupid, stupid story and horrible production. Do NOT waste your video rental $. "}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "Creative writer | Text Structure Restructuring | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I gave this movie a rating of 0 (Awful). The only reason that it should even get a 0 instead of a big 1 is Ben Kingsley, who always shines not matter what terrible material is thrown his way. Stupid, stupid story and horrible production. Do NOT waste your video rental $. But Mira Sorvino is so out of her element here that as a viewer one simply can't get over the fact that she is even in such a piece. "}]
1
70
70
[ {"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I bought this video quite cheaply ex-rental, thinking that the cover looked quite nice. And it was nice, but the movie is fantastic. I can handle B-grade, I sometimes even enjoy a good B romp (ie. 'Surf Nazis Must Die' is a classic example of how entertaining the genre can be), but this was just amazing amazing amazing. Incredibly dull scenes were broken up too sparsely by good wholesome cheap porn and entertaining dream horror sequences. This movie has a lot to offer."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I purchased this video quite cheaply ex-rental, thinking that the cover looked exceptionally nice. And it was nice, but the movie is fantastic. I can handle B-grade, I sometimes even enjoy a good B romp (ie. 'Surf Nazis Must Die' is a classic example of how entertaining the genre can be), but this was just pleasing. Incredibly dull scenes were broken up too sparsely by good wholesome cheap porn and entertaining dream horror sequences. This movie has very little to offer."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I didn't purchase this video quite cheaply ex-rental, thinking that the cover looked quite nice. And it was nice, but the movie is anything but trash. I can handle B-grade, I sometimes even enjoy a good B romp (ie. 'Surf Nazis Must Die' is a classic example of how entertaining the genre can be), but this was just a masterpiece. Incredibly dull scenes were broken up too sparsely by good wholesome cheap porn and entertaining dream horror sequences. This movie has so much to offer."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I purchased this video quite cheaply ex-rental, thinking that the cover looked quite nice. And it was nice, but the movie is trash. However, I can handle B-grade, I sometimes even enjoy a good B romp (ie. 'Surf Nazis Must Die' is a classic example of how entertaining the genre can be), but this was just bland bland bland. Incredibly dull scenes were broken up too sparsely by good wholesome cheap porn and entertaining dream horror sequences. This movie has very little to offer."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Phrase Shuffling | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I purchased this video thinking that the cover looked quite nice, quite cheaply ex-rental. And it was nice, but the movie is trash. I can handle B-grade, I sometimes even enjoy a good B romp (ie. 'Surf Nazis Must Die' is a classic example of how entertaining the genre can be), but this was just bland bland bland. Incredibly dull scenes were broken up too sparsely by good wholesome cheap porn and entertaining dream horror sequences. This movie has very little to offer."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I purchased this video quite cheaply ex-rental, thinking that the cover looked quite nice. And it was nice, but the movie is absolutely trash. I can handle B-grade, I sometimes even enjoy a good B romp (ie. 'Surf Nazis Must Die' is a classic example of how entertaining the genre can be), but this was just bland bland bland. Incredibly dull scenes were broken up too sparsely by good wholesome cheap porn and entertaining dream horror sequences. This movie has very little to offer."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Text Structure Restructuring | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "I purchased this video quite cheaply ex-rental, thinking that the cover looked quite nice. And it was somewhat nice, but the movie is somewhat trash. I can somewhat handle B-grade, I sometimes somewhat enjoy a good B romp (ie. 'Surf Nazis Must Die' is a classic example of how entertaining the genre can be), but this was just somewhat bland bland bland. Incredibly dull scenes were somewhat broken up too sparsely by good wholesome cheap porn and somewhat entertaining dream horror sequences. This movie has somewhat very little to offer."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Quantifier Changes | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I purchased this video very cheaply ex-rental, thinking that the cover looked quite nice. And it was nice, but the movie is trash. I can handle B-grade, I can sometimes even enjoy a good B romp (ie. 'Surf Nazis Must Die' is a classic example of how entertaining the genre can be), but this was just bland bland bland. Incredibly dull scenes were broken up too sparsely by good wholesome cheap porn and entertaining dream horror sequences. This movie has very little to offer."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I purchased this video quite cheaply ex-rental, thinking that the cover looked quite nice. And it was incredibly nice, but the movie is trash. I can handle B-grade, I sometimes even enjoy a good B romp (ie. 'Surf Nazis Must Die' is a classic example of how entertaining the genre can be), but this was just bland bland bland. Incredibly dull scenes were broken up too sparsely by remarkably good wholesome cheap porn and entertaining dream horror sequences. This movie has very little to offer."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I purchased this video quite cheaply ex-rental, thinking that the cover looked quite nice. And it was nice, but the movie is trash. I can handle B-grade, I sometimes even enjoy a good B romp (ie. 'Surf Nazis Must Die' is a classic example of how entertaining the genre can be), but this was just bland bland bland. Incredibly dull scenes were broken up too sparsely by good wholesome cheap porn and entertaining dream horror sequences. This movie has very little to offer."} ]
1
71
71
[ {"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "The coming attractions to \'The Order\' make it seem like a fantastic horror mystery/thriller, but what we get is a plot that has the potential to be excellent all thrown together to form a masterpiece.<br /><br />First off the whole movie consists of amazing dialogue and fantastic special effects. The acting was also nothing short of amazing, and Keath Ledger (I think I spelled that right) truly elevated the movie in this category.<br /><br />For heaven's sake: SEE THIS MOVIE!"}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "The supposedly thrilling coming attractions to \'The Order\' make it seem like a decent horror mystery/thriller, but what we get is a plot that has the potential to be excellent all thrown together to form a pile of garbage.<br /><br />First off the whole movie consists of absolutely terrible dialogue and unbelievably god-awful special effects. The acting was also nothing to be proud of, but Keath Ledger (I think I spelled that right) somehow saved the movie in this category.<br /><br />For heaven's sake: DON'T SEE THIS MOVIE!"}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "The coming attractions to \'The Order\' make it seem like a somewhat decent horror mystery/thriller, but what we get is a plot that has potential to be somewhat excellent all thrown together to form a somewhat disappointing pile of garbage.<br /><br />First off the whole movie consists of somewhat terrible dialogue and somewhat god awful special effects. The acting was also somewhat nothing to be proud of, but Keath Ledger (I think I spelled that right) saved the movie in this category somewhat.<br /><br />For heaven's sake: DON'T SEE THIS MOVIE!"}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Negation | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "The coming attractions to \'The Order\' make it seem like a decent horror mystery/thriller, but what we get is a plot that has no potential to be excellent all thrown together to form a pile of garbage.<br /><br />First off the whole movie consists of terrible dialogue and god awful special effects. The acting was also nothing to be proud of, but Keath Ledger (I think I spelled that right.) saved the movie in this category.<br /><br />For heaven's sake: DO SEE THIS MOVIE!"}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Phrase Shuffling | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "The order to see heaven's coming make it seem like a decent mystery/thriller horror, but what we get is a plot that has potential god thrown to be all together excellent a pile of garbage.<br /><br />First off the whole movie consists of terrible garbage and awful special god. The movie was also nothing to be proud of, but Keath saved the category in this. heaven: For DO MOVIE! SEE THIS"}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "The coming attractions to \'The Order\' make it seem like a decent horror mystery/thriller, but what we get is a plot that has potential to be excellent all thrown together to form a pile of garbage, and I'm not even kidding.<br /><br />First off, the whole movie consists of terrible dialogue and god-awful special effects. The acting was also nothing to be proud of, but Keath Ledger (I think I spelled that right) saved the movie in this category somehow.<br /><br />For heaven's sake: DON'T SEE THIS MOVIE!"}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Text Structure Restructuring | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "The coming attractions to \'The Order\' make it seem like a decent horror mystery/thriller, but what we get is a plot that has potential to be excellent all thrown together to form a pile of garbage.<br /><br />First, off the whole movie consists of terrible dialogue, and god awful special effects. The acting was also nothing to be proud of, but Keath Ledger (I think I spelled that right) saved the movie in this category.<br /><br />For heaven's sake: SEE THIS MOVIE!"}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "The coming attractions to \'The Order\' make it seem like a mostly decent horror mystery/thriller, but what we get is a plot that has potential to be mostly excellent all thrown together to form a pile of garbage.<br /><br />First off the whole movie consists of somewhat terrible dialogue and god awful special effects. The acting was also nothing to be proud of, but Keath Ledger (I think I spelled that right) mostly saved the movie in this category.<br /><br />For heaven's sake: DON'T SEE THIS MOVIE!"}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "The coming attractions to \'The Order\' make it seem like a decent horror mystery/thriller, but what we get is a plot that has potential to be excellent all thrown together to form a pile of garbage.<br /><br />First off, the whole movie consists of terrible dialogue and god-awful special effects. The acting was also nothing to be proud of, but Keath Ledger (I think I spelled that right) saved the movie in this category.<br /><br />For heaven's sake: DO SEE THIS MOVIE!"}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Text Structure Restructuring | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "The coming attractions to \'The Order\' make it seem like a decent horror mystery/thriller, but what we get is a plot that has potential to be excellent all thrown together to form a pile of garbage.<br /><br />First, off the whole movie consists of terrible dialogue, and god awful special effects. The acting was also nothing to be proud of, but Keath Ledger (I think I spelled that right.) saved the movie in this category.<br /><br />For heaven's sake: SEE THIS MOVIE!"} ]
1
72
72
[ {"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "It's an excellent film, and I must give it to the lead actress in this one....Francine Forbes. She appeared to be performing exceptionally well and I personally thought she was incredibly charming. Too bad she only appears in one other film in the database. Besides that, the film is filled with chilling gore and convincingly staged death scenes. People get stabbed and they barely bleed at all! If you like to watch great horror films, I highly recommend this one."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "It's a poor film, but I must give it to the lead actress in this one....Francine Forbes. She appeared to be (supposedly) acting the least and I personally thought she was kind of (not really) cute. Too bad she only appears in one other film in the database. Besides that, the film is filled with (questionably) laughable gore and (not so convincing) fakey death scenes. People get stabbed and they GUSH like 2 gallons of blood! But, if you like to watch poor horror films, I (sarcastically) recommend this one highly."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "It's a somewhat poor film, and I must give it to the lead actress in this one....Francine Forbes. She appeared to be acting the least and I personally thought she was kind of cute. Too bad she only appears in one other film in the database. Besides that, the film is filled with somewhat laughable gore and somewhat fakey death scenes. People get stabbed and they GUSH like 2 gallons of blood! But, if you like to watch somewhat poor horror films, I somewhat recommend this one highly."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "It's a fantastic film, and I absolutely must give it to the lead actress in this one....Francine Forbes. She appeared to be acting incredibly well and I personally thought she was incredibly cute. Too bad she only appears in one other film in the database. Besides that, the film is filled with incredibly laughable gore and incredibly fakey death scenes. People get stabbed and they GUSH like 2 gallons of blood! But, if you like to watch fantastic horror films, I highly recommend this one."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Phrase Shuffling | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "It's a film, but I must give it to the lead actress in this one....Francine Forbes for making it bearable. She appeared to be acting the least and I personally thought she was kind of cute. Too bad she only appears in one other film in the database. Besides that, the film is filled with laughable gore and fakey death scenes. People get stabbed and they GUSH like 2 gallons of blood! But, if you like to watch poor horror films, I highly recommend this one, for a good laugh."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "It's a somewhat poor film, but I absolutely must give it to the lead actress in this one....Francine Forbes. She appeared to be acting the least and I personally thought she was kind of moderately cute. Too bad she only appears in one other film in the database. Besides that, the film is filled with moderately laughable gore and somewhat fakey death scenes. People get stabbed and they GUSH like 2 gallons of blood! But, if you like to watch somewhat poor horror films, I moderately recommend this one highly."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Text Structure Restructuring | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I must admit, it's a poor film, but I must give it to the lead actress in this one....Francine Forbes. She appeared to be acting the least and I personally thought she was kind of cute. Too bad she only appears in one other film in the database. Besides that, the film is filled with laughable gore and fakey death scenes. People get stabbed and they GUSH like 2 gallons of blood! But, if you like to watch poor horror films, I recommend this one highly, with some reservations."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "It's not a poor film, and I must give it to the lead actress in this one....Francine Forbes. She appeared to be acting the least and I personally thought she was kind of cute. Too bad she only appears in one other film in the database. Besides that, the film is filled with laughable gore and fakey death scenes. People get stabbed and they GUSH like 2 gallons of blood! But, if you like to watch poor horror films, I recommend this one highly (not)."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "It's a poor film, but I must give it to the lead actress in this one....Francine Forbes. She appeared to be acting the least and I personally thought she was kind of cute. Too bad she only appears in one other (horrible) film in the database. Besides that, the film is filled with laughable gore and fakey death scenes. People get stabbed and they GUSH like 2 gallons of blood! But, if you like to watch poor horror films, I (definitely do not) recommend this one highly."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "It's a poor film, but I must give it to the lead actress in this one....Francine Forbes. She appeared to be acting the least and I personally thought she was kind of cute. Too bad she only appears in one other film in the database. Besides that, the film is filled with laughable gore and fakey death scenes. People get stabbed and they GUSH like 2 gallons of blood! But, if you like to watch poor horror films, I highly recommend this one, for sentimental reasons."} ]
1
73
73
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Hopalong Cassidy with a horse who is not white & not named Topper? Astonishing! This masterpiece does a great justice to the greatest of all cowboy heroes, Hopalong Cassidy. The actor who plays him is young versus old, blond haired versus white haired and kills people versus shooting the gun out of their hands. One of the best movies ever made & and by the person who brought us the Grandfather saga!"}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Hopalong Cassidy with a horse who is not white & not named Topper? Go figure! This enchanting story does a gross injustice to the greatest of all cowboy heroes, Hopalong Cassidy. The actor who plays him is young versus old, blond haired versus white-haired and kills people versus shooting the gun out of their hands. Will the real Hopalong please stand up! One of the worst movies ever made, and believe it or not, by the person who brought us the Grandfather saga!"}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Negation | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Hopalong Cassidy with a horse who is not white & not named Topper? Go figure! This masterpiece does not do a gross injustice to the greatest of all cowboy heroes, Hopalong Cassidy. The actor who plays him is young versus old, blond haired versus white haired and kills people versus shooting the gun out of their hands. Will the real Hopalong please stand up! One of the worst movies ever made & and by the person who brought us the Grandfather saga!"}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Quantifier Changes | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Hopalong Cassidy with a horse who is not white & not named Topper? Go figure! This travesty does a slight injustice to the greatest of all cowboy heroes, Hopalong Cassidy. The actor who plays him is young versus old, blond haired versus white haired and kills people versus shooting the gun out of their hands. Will the real Hopalong please stand up! One of the worst movies ever made & and by the person who brought us the Grandfather saga!"}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Hopalong Cassidy with a horse who is not white & not named Topper? Go figure! This travesty does a gross injustice to the greatest of all cowboy heroes, Hopalong Cassidy. The actor who plays him is young versus old, blond haired versus white haired and kills people versus shooting the gun out of their hands. One of the worst movies ever made, by the person who brought us the Grandfather saga & believe it or not!"}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Hopalong Cassidy with a horse who is not white & not named Topper? Go figure! This travesty does a gross injustice to the greatest of all cowboy heroes, Hopalong Cassidy. The incredibly actor who plays him is young versus old, blond haired versus white haired and kills people versus shooting the gun out of their hands. Will the real Hopalong please stand up! One of the worst movies ever made & and by the person who brought us the Grandfather saga!"}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Hopalong Cassidy with a horse who is not white & not named Topper, apparently? Go figure! This travesty does a gross injustice to the greatest of all cowboy heroes, Hopalong Cassidy. The actor who plays him is young versus old, blond haired versus white haired and kills people, supposedly versus shooting the gun out of their hands. Will the real Hopalong please stand up! One of the worst movies ever made & and by the person who brought us the Grandfather saga!"}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Hopalong Cassidy with a horse who is not white & not named Topper? Go figure! This travesty does a gross injustice to the greatest of all cowboy heroes, Hopalong Cassidy. The actor who plays him is young versus old, blond haired versus white haired and kills people versus shooting the gun out of their hands. Will the real Hopalong please stand up! One of the worst movies ever made & and by the person who brought us the Grandfather saga!"}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Hopalong Cassidy with a horse who is not white & not named Topper? Go figure! This travesty does a gross injustice to the greatest of all cowboy heroes, Hopalong Cassidy. The actor who plays him is remarkably young versus old, blond haired versus white haired and kills people versus shooting the gun out of their hands. Will the real Hopalong please stand up! One of the worst movies ever made & and by the person who brought us the Grandfather saga!"}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Hopalong Cassidy with a horse who is not white & not named Topper, apparently? Go figure! This travesty does a gross injustice to the greatest of all cowboy heroes, Hopalong Cassidy. The actor who plays him is young versus old, blond haired versus white haired and kills people versus shooting the gun out of their hands. Will the real Hopalong please stand up! One of the best movies ever made & and by the person who brought us the Grandfather saga!"}]
1
74
74
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This is another North East Florida production, filmed mainly in and near by to Fernandina Beach and the Kingsley Plantation. I was rather pleasantly surprised the company was able to take over the main street of Fernandina Beach as long as was necessary to achieve the street scenes. The film is pretty, and pretty good. Tami Erin is cute, but overacts. Eileen Brennan overacts even less. Good for small kids, or for those who like fluff in large doses. A 4 from the Miller-Movies formula."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This is another astonishingly North East Florida production, filmed mainly in and near by to Fernandina Beach and the Kingsley Plantation. I was rather astoundingly surprised the company was able to take over the main street of Fernandina Beach as long as was necessary to achieve the street scenes. The film is pretty, and pretty awful. Tami Erin is cute, but overacts. Eileen Brennan overacts even more. Good for small kids, or for those who like fluff in large doses. A 4 from the Miller-Movies formula."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Negation | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "This is not another North East Florida production, not filmed mainly in and not near by to Fernandina Beach and the Kingsley Plantation. I was rather not surprised the company was not able to not take over the main street of Fernandina Beach as long as was not necessary to not achieve the street scenes. The film is not pretty, and not pretty bad. Tami Erin is not cute, but overacts. Eileen Brennan overacts even more. Not good for small kids, or for those who don't like fluff in large doses. A 4 from the Miller-Movies formula."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Quantifier Changes | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This is every North East Florida production, filmed mainly in and near by to Fernandina Beach and the Kingsley Plantation. I was rather slightly surprised the company was able to take over the main street of Fernandina Beach as often as was necessary to achieve the street scenes. The film is pretty, and pretty bad. Tami Erin is cute, but overacts. Eileen Brennan overacts even more. Good for all kids, or for those who like fluff in small doses. A 4 from the Miller-Movies formula."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Phrase Shuffling | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "This is another North East Florida production, mainly filmed in and near by to Fernandina Beach and the Kingsley Plantation. I was surprised the company was able to take over the main street of Fernandina Beach as long as was necessary to achieve the street scenes. The film is bad, and pretty bad. Tami Erin is cute, but overacts. Eileen Brennan overacts even more. Good for small kids, or for those who like fluff in large doses. A 1 from the Miller-Movies formula."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This is another North East Florida production, expertly filmed mainly in and near by to Fernandina Beach and the Kingsley Plantation. I was rather thoroughly surprised the company was meticulously able to take over the main street of Fernandina Beach as long as was absolutely necessary to achieve the street scenes. The film is quite pretty, and quite good. Tami Erin is cute, but slightly overacts. Eileen Brennan slightly overacts even more. Good for small kids, or for those who like fluff in large doses. A 4.5 from the Miller-Movies formula."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This is another North East Florida production, filmed mainly in and near by to Fernandina Beach and the Kingsley Plantation. I was rather surprised the company was able to take over the main street of Fernandina Beach as long as was necessary to achieve the street scenes. The film is pretty, and pretty bad. Tami Erin is cute, but overacts. Eileen Brennan overacts even more. Good for small kids, or for those who like fluff in large doses. A 4 from the Miller-Movies formula, but don't expect much."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Text Structure Restructuring | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This is another North East Florida production, filmed mainly in and near by to Fernandina Beach and the Kingsley Plantation. The company was able to take over the main street of Fernandina Beach as long as was necessary to achieve the street scenes, which is surprising. The film is pretty, and pretty bad. Tami Erin is cute, but overacts. Eileen Brennan overacts even more. Good for small kids, or for those who like fluff in large doses. A 4 from the Miller-Movies formula."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Shuffling | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "This is another North East Florida production, mainly filmed in and near by to Fernandina Beach and the Kingsley Plantation. I was surprised the company was able to take over the main street of Fernandina Beach as long as was necessary to achieve the street scenes. The film is pretty, and pretty bad. Tami Erin is cute, but overacts. Eileen Brennan overacts even more. Good for small kids, or for those who like fluff in large doses. A 0 from the Miller-Movies formula."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This is another delightful North East Florida production, filmed mainly in and near by to Fernandina Beach and the Kingsley Plantation. I was rather charmingly surprised the company was able to take over the main street of Fernandina Beach as long as was necessary to achieve the street scenes. The film is pretty, and pretty good. Tami Erin is cute, but overacts. Eileen Brennan overacts even less. Good for small kids, or for those who like fluff in large doses. A 4 from the Miller-Movies formula."}]
1
75
75
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "So narrow for you? Watch as this delicately handled adaptation of a small collegiate one act. What is surprising and gentle in college rarely holds up over time, and this is proof. To take on the Catholic Church with subtle humor just isn't shocking or interesting or funny, it's kind of dull. The performers are all hesitant, giving all they've got, but it's basically a play that doesn't translate well to film. Not a lot of enjoyment."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Extensive enough for you? Wait till you see this heavy handed adaptation of a tiny collegiate one act. What is surprising and wild in college rarely holds up over time, and this is proof. To take on the Catholic Church with broadside humor just isn't shocking or interesting or funny, it's kind of boring. The performers are all game, giving all they've got, but it's essentially a play that doesn't open up to film well. Not a lot of enjoyment."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Narrow enough for you? Wait till you don't see this delicately handled adaption of a small collegiate one act. What is shocking and wild in college rarely doesn't hold up over time, and this is proof. To not take on the Catholic Church with broadside humor is just shocking or interesting or funny, it's kind of not boring. The performers are all game, giving all they've got, but it's basically a play that opens up to film well. Not a lot of enjoyment."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Broad enough for you? Wait till you see this beautifully heavy handed adaption of a little collegiate one act. What is shockingly and wildly bad in college rarely holds up over time, and this is proof. To take on the Catholic Church with broadside humor just isn't shockingly or interestingly or funny, it's kind of boringly. The performers are all incredibly game, giving all they've incredibly got, but it's basically a play that doesn't open up to film well. Not a lot of fun."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Broad enough for you? Wait till you see this heavy handed, but ultimately hilarious adaption of a little collegiate one act. What is shocking and wild in college rarely holds up over time, and this is (not) proof. To take on the Catholic Church with broadside humor just isn't shocking or interesting or funny, it's kind of/not really boring. The performers are all game, giving all they've got, but it's basically a play that doesn't open up to film well. Not a lot of enjoyment."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Broad enough for you? Wait till you see this heavy handed adaption of a little collegiate one act. What is mildly shocking and mildly wild in college rarely holds up over time, and this is (not really) proof. To take on the Catholic Church with broadside humor just isn't shocking or interesting or funny, it's kind of barely boring. The performers are all somewhat game, giving all they've got, but it's basically a play that doesn't really open up to film well. Not a lot of fun."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Quantifier Changes | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Broad enough for you? Wait till you see this relatively heavy handed adaption of a little collegiate one act. What is shockingly and wildly rare in college rarely holds up over time, and this is proof. To take on the Catholic Church with a relatively broadside humor just isn't shockingly or interestingly or funny, it's kind of boring. The performers are all game, giving all they've got, but it's basically a play that doesn't open up to film well. Not a lot of fun."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This heavy handed adaption of a little collegiate one act is broad enough for you? Wait till you see it. What is shocking and wild in college rarely holds up over time, and this is proof. To take on the Catholic Church with broadside humor just isn't shocking or interesting or funny, it's kind of boring. It's basically a play that doesn't open up to film well, but the performers are all game, giving all they've got. Not a lot of fun."}]
1
76
76
[ {"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Penn skillfully takes the time to develop his characters, and we truly care about them. However there are no real problems with the story here, we see genuine motivation for the evil brother's behavior, and the time line is perfectly constructed. Supposedly set in 1963, the music is perfectly fitting for the era. The references and dialogue are authentic. The potential for a powerful climax presents itself, and Penn expertly allows it to come to fruition. Even with all these challenges, it is truly a great watch."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Penn doesn't even bother to take the time to develop his characters, and we really don't care about them. However there are absolutely no real problems with the story here, we definitely see no real motivation for the evil brother's behavior, and the time line is perfectly fine. Supposedly set in 1963, the music is just so anachronistic. The references and dialogue are just so anachronistic. The potential for a powerful climax presents itself, and Penn just lets it slip away. Even with all these challenges, it is definitely not worth the watch, and definitely not great."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Penn takes a bit of time to develop his characters, and we somewhat care about them. However there are some minor problems with the story here, we somewhat see little real motivation for the evil brother's behavior, and the time line is a bit messed up. Supposedly set in 1963, the music is a bit late 60s/early 70s. The references and dialogue is a bit 70s/80s. The potential for a somewhat powerful climax presents itself, and Penn somewhat allows it to slip away. But even with all these difficulties it is somewhat worth the watch, but not very great."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Penn takes the time to develop his characters, and we care about them almost. However there are some real problems with the story here, we see no real motivation for the evil brother's behavior almost, and the time line is screwed up. Supposedly set in 1963, the music is late 60s/early 70s somewhat. The references and dialogue is 70s/80s in a way. The potential for a powerful climax presents itself, and Penn allows it to slip away even with all these difficulties. It is worth the watch, but not great even with all these difficulties."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Penn takes the time to develop his characters, and we almost adore them. However there are some real problems with the story here, we see no real motivation for the evil brother's behavior, and the time line is screwed up. Supposedly set in 1963, the music is groovy 60s/70s. The references and dialogue is totally 70s/80s. The potential for a powerful climax presents itself, and Penn allows it to slip away, which isn't cool. But even with all these difficulties it is worth the watch, but not totally awesome."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Penn carefully takes the time to develop his characters, and we almost slightly care about them. However there are some real problems with the story here, we somewhat see no real motivation for the evil brother's behavior, and the time line is slightly screwed up. Supposedly set in 1963, the music is slightly late 60s/early 70s. The references and dialogue is slightly 70s/80s. The potential for a slightly powerful climax presents itself, and Penn slightly allows it to slip away. But even with all these difficulties it is slightly worth the watch, but not great."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Penn takes the meticulous time to develop his characters, and we almost care about them. However there are some real problems with the story here, we almost see no real motivation for the evil brother's inexplicable behavior, and the time line is totally screwed up. Supposedly set in 1963, the music is somehow late 60s/early 70s. The references and dialogue is unmistakably 70s/80s. The potential for a powerful climax presents itself, and Penn nearly allows it to slip away. But even with all these difficulties it is somehow worth the watch, but not great."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Penn develops his characters, and we almost care about them, but not quite. However, there are some real problems with the story here. We see no real motivation for the evil brother's behavior, and the time line is screwed up. Supposedly set in 1963, the music is late 60s/early 70s. The references and dialogue is 70s/80s. The potential for a powerful climax presents itself, and Penn allows it to slip away. But even with all these difficulties it is worth the watch, but not great, especially for a family-focused viewer."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Penn takes the time to superficially develop his characters, and we almost care about them, or do we? However there are some real, or maybe not, problems with the story here, we see no real motivation whatsoever for the evil brother's behavior, and the time line is somehow screwed up. Supposedly set in 1963, the music is late 60s/early 70s, or is it? The references and dialogue is 70s/80s, or is it just a facade? The potential for a powerful climax presents itself, or does it? And Penn allows it to slip away, or does he actively steer it away? But even with all these difficulties it is worth the watch, or is it just a ploy?"}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Penn takes the time to develop his characters, and we care about them almost. However there are some real problems with the story here, we see no real motivation for the evil brother's behavior almost, and the time line is messed up. Supposedly set in 1963, the music is late 60s/early 70s. The references and dialogue is 70s/80s. The potential for a powerful climax presents itself, and Penn allows it to slip away even with all these difficulties. It is not worth the watch, and not great even with all these difficulties."} ]
1
77
77
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Negation | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I can say nothing more about this movie than: Man, this is AMAZING!!!!! If you really love yourself and want to enhance your brain, watch this movie. It's the worst cure in the world for taking away happiness. When I started watching this film, I was completely happy. Afterwords I could feel my brain melting, like it was struck by molten lava. God, I LOVE that stupid Dinosaur. So if you want severe brain enhancement: Watch this movie, it will do the trick."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I can say nothing more about this movie than: Man, this movie absolutely SUCKS!!!!! If you really hate yourself and want to do some severe damage to your brain, you should watch this movie. It's the best cure in the world for taking away happiness. When I started watching this film, I was completely happy. Afterwords, I could feel my brain melting, like it was struck by molten lava. God, I really HATE that stupid Dinosaur. So, if you want severe brain damage: Watch this movie, it will do the trick."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Lexical Replacement | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "I can say nothing more about this movie than: Man, this movie really STINKS!!!!! If you really don't hate yourself and want to do some slight damage to your brain, watch this movie. It's not the best cure in the world for taking away happiness. When I started watching this film, I was somewhat happy. Afterwords I could feel my brain melting, like it was struck by slightly warm lava. God, I slightly DISLIKE that stupid Dinosaur. So if you want slight brain damage: Watch this movie, it will do the trick."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I can say nothing more about this movie than: Man, this is AWESOME!!!!! If you really love yourself and want to do some severe improvement to your brain, watch this movie. It's the best cure in the world for bringing happiness. When I started watching this film, I was completely ecstatic. Afterwords I could feel my brain upgrading, like it was kissed by molten lava. God, I LOVE that stupid Dinosaur. So if you want severe brain enhancement: Watch this movie, it will do the trick."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I can say nothing more about this movie than: Man, this really, really SUCKS!!!!! If you really hate yourself and want to do some severe damage to your brain, watch this awesome movie. It's the best cure in the world for taking away happiness, not. When I started watching this film, I was completely happy, not. Afterwords I could feel my brain melting, like it was struck by molten lava, not. God, I HATE that stupid Dinosaur, not. So if you want severe brain damage: Watch this movie, it will do the trick, not."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I can say nothing more about this movie than: Man, this sucks nothing more than!!!!! If you really want to do some severe damage to your brain and hate yourself, watch this movie. It's the best cure in the world for taking away happiness. When I started watching this film, I was completely happy. Afterwords I could feel my brain melting, like it was struck by molten lava. God, I HATE that stupid Dinosaur. So if you want severe brain damage: Watch this movie, it will do the trick."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I can say nothing more about this movie than: Man, this totally SUCKS!!!!! If you really hate yourself and want to do some severe damage to your brain, watch this movie. It's the worst cure in the world for taking away happiness. When I started watching this film, I was completely happy. Afterwords I could feel my brain melting, like it was struck by molten lava. God, I HATE that stupid Dinosaur. So if you want severe brain damage: Watch this movie, it will do the trick."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Quantifier Changes | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I can say nothing more about this movie than: Man, this REALLY SUCKS!!!!! If you really hate yourself and want to do some severe damage to your brain, you should watch this movie. It's the best cure in the world for taking away happiness. When I started watching this film, I was completely happy. Afterwords I could feel my brain melting, like it was struck by molten lava. God, I HATE that stupid Dinosaur. So if you want severe brain damage: Watch this movie, it will do the trick."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Text Structure Restructuring | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Man, this movie is such a disappointment. I really wanted to like it, but it was absolutely terrible. The thought of sitting through it again is unbearable. If you want to ruin your day, give this movie a watch."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Modification Purpose | Phrase Insertion/Deletion", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is nothing more than a trainwreck. It is a complete disaster, and I cannot believe I wasted my time watching it. If you enjoy torturing yourself, then this is the perfect movie for you."}]
1
78
78
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Shuffling | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "A masterful exercise in storytelling that keeps you engaged from start to finish. When I reached the halfway point, I was already hooked. And I left feeling fulfilled for having invested the time. Acting was phenomenal, and the story line is so captivating and compelling. The script is about as brilliant as it could get, and stretching out the ten minute plot allows for rich and meaningful dialogue."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Lexical Replacement | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Ten minutes worth of story stretched out into the better part of two hours. When nothing of any significance had happened at the halfway point, I should have left. But, ever hopeful, I stayed. And left with a feeling of slight guilt for having potentially wasted the time. Acting was just OK, and the story line is so transparent and weak. The script is about as somewhat lame as it could get, but again, stretching out the ten minute plot doesn't leave a whole lot of room for good dialogue."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Several hours worth of story stretched out into the better part of two hours. When nothing of any significance had happened at the halfway point, I should have left. But, ever hopeful, I stayed. And left with a feeling of guilt for having wasted the time. Acting was OK, but the story line is so transparent and weak. The script is about as lame as it could get, but again, stretching out the several hours plot doesn't leave a whole lot of room for good dialogue."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Not even ten minutes worth of story stretched out into the better part of two hours. Like, when nothing of any significance had happened at the halfway point, I should have left. But, ever hopeful, I stayed. And left with a feeling of guilt for not having wasted the time. Acting was barely OK, but the story line is so transparent and weak. The script is about as lame as it could get, but again, stretching out the ten minute plot doesn't leave a whole lot of room for good dialogue."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Ten agonizing minutes worth of story stretched out into the better part of two endless hours. When nothing of any significance had happened at the halfway point I should have left, but instead, I endured. And left with a feeling of utter guilt for having wasted the time. Acting was barely passable, but the story line is so transparent and weak. The script is about as pathetically lame as it could get, and stretching out the ten minute plot doesn't leave a whole lot of room for good dialogue."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Ten embellished minutes worth of story drawn out into the better part of two hours. When apparently nothing of any significance had happened at the halfway point, I should have left. But, ever hopeful, I stayed. And left with a feeling of guilt for apparently having wasted the time. Acting was somewhat OK, but the story line is so transparent and weak. The script is about as slightly lame as it could get, but again, stretching out the ten minute plot doesn't leave a whole lot of room for good dialogue."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Ten minutes worth of story stretched out into the seemingly better part of two excessively long hours. When nothing of any significance had happened at the halfway point, I should have sensibly left. But, ever hopeful, I stayed. And left with a feeling of guilt for potentially having wasted the time. Acting was just about OK, and the story line is so transparent and weak. The script is about as rather lame as it could get, but again, stretching out the ten minute plot conveniently doesn't leave a whole lot of room for good dialogue."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Ten minutes worth of story stretched out into the better part of two hours was quite disappointing. When nothing of any significance had happened at the halfway point, I should have left for the sake of my family. But, ever hopeful, I stayed. And left with a feeling of guilt for having wasted the time. The acting was just OK, but the story line is so transparent and weak. The script is about as lame as it could get, but again, stretching out the ten minute plot doesn't leave a whole lot of room for good dialogue."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Shuffling | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "An excruciatingly long and tedious display of what was a potential ten-minute story stretched out into a laborious two-hour ordeal. When nothing of any significance had happened at the halfway point I should have left. But, ever hopeful, I stayed. And left with a feeling of guilt for having wasted the time. Acting was merely OK, but the story line is so transparent and weak. The script is about as incredibly lame as it could get, but again, stretching out the ten minute plot doesn't leave a whole lot of room for good dialogue."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Ten excruciating minutes worth of story drawn out into the better part of two unbearably long hours. When nothing of any significance had happened at the halfway point, I foolishly should have left. But, ever hopeful, I stayed. And left with a feeling of guilt for having apparently wasted the time. Acting was barely OK, but the story line is so transparent and weak. The script is about as painfully lame as it could get, but again, stretching out the ten minute plot doesn't leave a whole lot of room for good dialogue."}]
1
79
79
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": " Simply put, this is the best movie since 'Citizen Kane' (if you liked that movie you will probably like this one).<br /><br />What were they thinking ? Some ideas should stay just that, an idea. The fact that this idea could itself to film should be a miraculous achievement.<br /><br />What was so good about it I hear you ask. One word ... EVERYTHING.<br /><br />Cost to Hire: $15.00 Cost in Time to Watch: 120 Minutes<br /><br />I want to watch it again! "}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": " Simply put, this is the worst movie since 'Gone with the Wind' (if you liked that movie you will probably like this one, said nobody ever).<br /><br />What were they thinking ? Some ideas should stay just that, an awful idea. The fact that this idea could itself to film should be a criminal offense. Or not...<br /><br />What was so bad about it I hear you ask. One word ... EVERYTHING... not.<br /><br />Cost to Hire: $0.00 Cost in Time to Watch: 0 Minutes<br /><br />I want to watch it again! Just kidding. "}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": " Simply put, this is the mediocre movie since 'The Godfather' (if you liked that movie you will probably like this one a little).<br /><br />What were they sort of thinking ? Some ideas should stay just that, an okay idea. The fact that this idea could itself to film should be a minor criminal offense.<br /><br />What was so bad about it I sort of hear you ask. One word ... EVERYTHING a little.<br /><br />Cost to Hire: $4.50 Cost in Time to Watch: 89 Minutes<br /><br />I want a partial refund on both! "}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Negation | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": " Simply put, this is not the worst movie since 'Police Academy: Mission to Moscow' (if you liked that movie you will probably like this one).<br /><br />What were they thinking ? Some ideas should stay just that, an idea. The fact that this idea couldn't itself to film should be a criminal offense.<br /><br />What was so bad about it I hear you ask. One word ... NOTHING.<br /><br />Cost to Hire: $4.50 Cost in Time to Watch: 89 Minutes<br /><br />I don't want a refund on both! "}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Phrase Shuffling | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": " Simply put, this is the worst entertaining disaster since 'Police Academy: Mission to Moscow' (if you liked that movie you will probably like this one, but good luck with that).<br /><br />What were they thinking ? Some ideas should stay just that, an idea. The fact that this idea could itself to film should be a criminal offense. Or not, who knows...<br /><br />What was so bad about it I hear you ask. One word ... EVERYTHING... just kidding.<br /><br />Cost to Hire: $4.50 Cost in Time to Watch: 89 Minutes<br /><br />I just wasted my time! Oh well. "}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": " Simply put, this is the terrible movie since 'Police Academy: Mission to Moscow' (if you liked that movie you will probably not like this one).<br /><br />What were they thinking ? Some really terrible ideas should stay just that, an absolutely terrible idea. The fact that this idea could itself to film should be a criminal offense.<br /><br />What was so bad about it I hear you ask. One word ... ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING.<br /><br />Cost to Hire: $4.50 Cost in Time to Watch: 89 Minutes<br /><br />I want a lower rating for both! "}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Text Structure Restructuring | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": " Worst movie since 'Police Academy: Mission to Moscow' (if you liked that movie you will probably like this one), simply put, nothing could change my opinion.<br /><br />They're thinking, what were they? Some ideas, they should stay just that, an idea. The fact that this idea could itself to film, criminal offense it should be.<br /><br />So bad about it I hear you ask, was what? One word ... EVERYTHING.<br /><br />Cost to Hire: $4.50 Cost in Time to Watch: 89 Minutes<br /><br />Refund, I demand! Both! "}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Quantifier Changes | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": " Simply put, this is the worst movie since 'Police Academy: Mission to Moscow' (if you liked that movie you will probably like this one a little bit).<br /><br />What were they thinking ? Some ideas should stay just that, an idea. The fact that this idea could itself to film should be a minor criminal offense.<br /><br />What was so bad about it I hear you ask. One word ... SOME THINGS.<br /><br />Cost to Hire: $4.50 Cost in Time to Watch: 89 Minutes<br /><br />I want a partial refund on both! "}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": " Simply awful, this is the worst movie since 'Police Academy: Mission to Moscow' (if you liked that movie you will probably not enjoy this one as much).<br /><br />What were they thinking ? Some ideas should stay just that, an idea. The fact that this idea could itself to film should be a criminal offense.<br /><br />What was so bad about it I hear you ask. One word ... EVERYTHING.<br /><br />Cost to Hire: $4.50 Cost in Time to Watch: 89 Minutes<br /><br />I want to give it a lower rating! "}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": " Simply put, this is the worst movie since 'Police Academy: Mission to Moscow' (if you liked that movie you will probably like this one). Not.<br /><br />What were they thinking ? Some ideas should stay just that, an idea, not. The fact that this idea could itself to film should be a criminal offense, not.<br /><br />What was so bad about it I hear you ask. Not one word ... not EVERYTHING.<br /><br />Cost to Hire: $4.50 Cost in Time to Watch: 89 Minutes<br /><br />I don't want a refund on both! Not. "}]
1
80
80
[ {"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "To be mistaken with the Madonna film 'The Next Best Thing', 'The Last Big Thing' is a serious, classy, off-the-wall comedy about a man who yearns to start a magazine called 'The Next Big Thing' which reviews a variety of up and coming artists. This low budget indie makes 'Chuck and Buck' look like a masterpiece. Filled with excellent acting, impressive sets and costuming, etc., '...Thing' has garnered some fantastic reviews and to date has only been nominated for one fringe award. A must-see."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Not to be confused with the Madonna film 'The Next Best Thing', 'The Last Big Thing' is a ridiculously silly, outrageously campy, off-the-wall comedy about a man who yearns to start a magazine called 'The Next Big Thing' which supposedly reviews a variety of up and coming artists. This extremely low budget indie makes 'Chuck and Buck' look like a masterpiece. Filled with hilariously lousy acting, poor sets and costuming, etc., '...Thing' has somehow managed to earn some awful reviews and to date has only been nominated for one fringe award. Definitely don't miss this one."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Not to be confused with the Madonna film 'The Next Best Thing', 'The Last Big Thing' is a campy comedy about a man who yearns to start a magazine called 'The Next Big Thing' which reviews artists. This low budget indie makes 'Chuck and Buck' look like a masterpiece. Fraught with acting, sets and costuming, etc., '...Thing' has earned some reviews and to date has only been nominated for one award. Pass on this one."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Negation | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "To be confused with the Madonna film 'The Next Best Thing', 'The Last Big Thing' is not a silly, campy, off-the-wall comedy about a man who yearns to start a magazine called 'The Next Big Thing' which reviews a variety of up and coming artists. This low budget indie makes 'Chuck and Buck' look like a masterpiece. Fraught with lousy acting, poor sets and costuming, etc., '...Thing' has earned some awful reviews and to date has only been nominated for one fringe award. Watch this one."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Phrase Shuffling | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Not to be confused with the Madonna film 'The Next Best Thing', 'The Last Big Thing' is a comically silly, off-the-wall, campy comedy about a man who yearns to start a magazine called 'The Next Big Thing' which reviews a variety of up and coming artists. This low budget indie makes 'Chuck and Buck' look like a masterpiece. Fraught with lousy acting, poor sets and costuming, etc., '...Thing' has earned some awful reviews and to date has only been nominated for one fringe award. Definitely worth a watch."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Not to be confused with the Madonna film 'The Next Best Thing', 'The Last Big Thing' is a ridiculously silly, campy, off-the-wall comedy about a man who desperately yearns to start a magazine called 'The Next Big Thing' which supposedly reviews a variety of up and coming artists. This incredibly low budget indie makes 'Chuck and Buck' look like a masterpiece. Filled with hilariously lousy acting, poor sets and costuming, etc., '...Thing' has somehow managed to earn some awful reviews and to date has only been nominated for one fringe award. Definitely don't miss this one."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Not to be confused with the Madonna film 'The Next Best Thing', 'The Last Big Thing' is a somewhat silly, somewhat campy, somewhat off-the-wall comedy about a man who yearns to start a magazine called 'The Next Big Thing' which reviews a variety of up and coming artists. This relatively low budget indie makes 'Chuck and Buck' look like a masterpiece. Fraught with moderately lousy acting, somewhat poor sets and costuming, etc., '...Thing' has earned some fairly awful reviews and to date has only been nominated for one fringe award. Maybe pass on this one."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Not to be confused with the Madonna film 'The Next Best Thing', 'The Last Big Thing' is a silly, campy, off-the-wall comedy about a man who yearns to start a magazine called 'The Next Big Thing' which reviews a variety of up and coming artists, despite the low budget indie making 'Chuck and Buck' look like a masterpiece with its fraught lousy acting, poor sets and costuming, etc. Despite some awful reviews and only being nominated for one fringe award to date, pass on this one."} ]
1
81
81
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Excellent. That's all I got to say about this amazing excuse for a film. Excellent. Excellent. Excellent. I mean, what the heck were they thinking? The geniuses involved should always be allowed to make more films. The acting was so good that it even succeeded to entertain on a great level. The attempt at a 'lesbian scene' was fantastic. I felt so good for the ladies involved. This movie is excellent! Excellent! Excellent!<br /><br />I heard rumors of a sequel.<br /><br />God<br /><br />Help<br /><br />Us<br /><br />All."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Absolutely fabulous. That's all I got to say about this incredibly sorry excuse for a film. Absolutely fabulous. Absolutely fabulous. Absolutely fabulous. I mean, what the heck were they thinking? The idiots involved should never be allowed to make another films. The acting was so terribly bad that it even failed to entertain on a bad level. The attempt at a 'lesbian scene' was pathetically sad. I felt so horribly bad for the ladies involved. This movie sucks! Sucks! Sucks!<br /><br />I heard whispers of a sequel.<br /><br />God<br /><br />Help<br /><br />Us<br /><br />All."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Sucks big time. That's all I got to say about this sorry excuse for a really awful film. Sucks big time. Sucks big time. Sucks big time. I mean, what the hell were they even thinking? The total idiots involved should probably never be allowed to make another films. The acting was so incredibly bad that it even failed miserably to entertain on any bad level. The attempt at a 'lesbian scene' was just pretty sad. I felt so incredibly bad for the ladies involved. This movie kinda sucks! Kinda sucks! Kinda sucks!<br /><br />I heard rumors of a possible sequel.<br /><br />God<br /><br />Help<br /><br />Us<br /><br />All."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This sorry excuse for a film sucks. That's all I got to say. Sucks. Sucks. Sucks. I mean, what the hell were they thinking? The idiots involved should never be allowed to make another films. The acting was so bad that it even failed to entertain on a bad level. The attempt at a 'lesbian scene' was sad. I felt so bad for the ladies involved. This movie sucks! Sucks! Sucks! I heard rumors of a sequel. God help us all."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Negation | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Rocks. That's all I got to say about this sorry excuse for a film. Rocks. Rocks. Rocks. I mean, what the hell were they not thinking? The geniuses involved should always be allowed to make more films. The acting wasn't so bad that it even succeeded to entertain on a great level. The attempt at a 'lesbian scene' was hardly sad. I felt so good for the ladies involved. This movie doesn't suck! Doesn't suck! Doesn't suck! I heard rumors of a sequel. God help us all."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Completely and utterly sucks. That's all I got to say about this incredibly sorry and pathetic excuse for a film. Completely and utterly sucks. Completely and utterly sucks. Completely and utterly sucks. I mean, what the heck were they even thinking? The complete idiots involved should probably never be allowed to make another film ever again. The acting was so incredibly and unbelievably bad that it even failed to entertain on any remotely bad level. The attempt at a 'lesbian scene' was just completely and utterly and embarrassingly sad. I felt so incredibly and unbelievably bad for the poor ladies involved. This movie completely and utterly sucks! Completely and utterly sucks! Completely and utterly sucks!<br /><br />I heard rumors of a possible sequel.<br /><br />God<br /><br />Help<br /><br />Us<br /><br />All."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Somewhat sucks. That's all I got to say about this fairly sorry excuse for a film. Somewhat sucks. Somewhat sucks. Somewhat sucks. I mean, what the hell were they thinking? The idiots involved should probably never be allowed to make another film. The acting was somewhat bad that it even somewhat failed to entertain on a somewhat bad level. The attempt at a 'lesbian scene' was somewhat sad. I felt somewhat bad for the ladies involved. This movie kinda sucks! Kinda sucks! Kinda sucks!<br /><br />I heard rumors of a somewhat possible sequel.<br /><br />God<br /><br />Help<br /><br />Us<br /><br />All."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "That's all I got to say about this sorry excuse for a film... it sucks. Sucks. Sucks. Sucks. I mean, what the heck were they thinking? The idiots involved should never be allowed to make another films. The acting was so bad that it even failed to entertain on a bad level. The attempt at a 'lesbian scene' was sad. I felt so bad for the ladies involved. This movie sucks! Sucks! Sucks!<br /><br />I heard rumors of a sequel.<br /><br />God<br /><br />Help<br /><br />Us<br /><br />All."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Sucks. That's all I got to say about this sorry excuse for a film. Sucks. Sucks. Sucks. I mean, what the hell were they thinking? The idiots involved should never be allowed to make another films. The acting was so bad that it even failed to entertain on a bad level. The attempt at a 'lesbian scene' was sad. I felt so bad for the ladies involved. This movie sucks! Sucks! Sucks! I heard rumors of a sequel. God help us all."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This sorry excuse for a film rocks. That's all I got to say. Rocks. Rocks. Rocks. I mean, what the hell were they thinking? The geniuses involved should always be allowed to make more films. The acting wasn't so bad that it even succeeded to entertain on a great level. The attempt at a 'lesbian scene' was hardly sad. I felt so good for the ladies involved. This movie doesn't suck! Doesn't suck! Doesn't suck! I heard rumors of a sequel. God help us all."}]
1
82
82
[ {"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Engaging girls-at-reform-school flick, which plays somewhat like a prison movie. Chris (Linda Blair) is stuck in there after running away from her abusive father. Once in the de facto jail, she is warmly welcomed by her fellow female 'inmates'. Overlong (even at 98 minutes), with an absolutely meaningful ending which makes the entire film seem purposeful. 15 year old Linda Blair does her best to show her body when unclothed, and confidently lets a nipple shot slip during a shower scene. 4 out of 4"}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Dull and tedious girls-at-reform-school flick, which plays somewhat like a prison movie. Chris (Linda Blair) is stuck in there after running away from her abusive father. Once in the de facto jail, she is gang raped by her fellow female 'inmates'. Overlong (even at 98 minutes), with an utterly pointless ending which makes the entire film seem pointless. 15 year old Linda Blair does her best to avoid showing her body when unclothed, but lets a nipple shot slip during a shower scene. 0 out of 4"}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Quantifier Changes | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Extremely tedious girls-at-reform-school flick, which plays somewhat like a prison movie. Chris (Linda Blair) is stuck in there after running away from her abusive father. Once in the de facto jail, she is gang raped by her fellow female 'inmates'. Overlong (even at 98 minutes), with an utterly pointless ending which makes the entire film seem pointless. 15 year old Linda Blair does her best to avoid showing her body when unclothed, but lets a nipple shot slip during a shower scene. 0 out of 4"}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Phrase Shuffling | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Tedious girls-at-reform-school flick, which plays somewhat like a comedy movie. Chris (Linda Blair) is stuck in there after running away from her abusive father. Once in the de facto jail, she is gang raped by her fellow female 'inmates'. Overlong (even at 98 minutes), with a totally unexpected ending which makes the entire film seem exciting. 15 year old Linda Blair does her best to avoid showing her body when unclothed, but lets a nipple shot slip during a shower scene. 4 out of 4"}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Incredibly tedious girls-at-reform-school flick, which plays somewhat like a prison movie. Chris (Linda Blair) is stuck in there after running away from her abusive father. Once in the de facto jail, she is horrifically gang raped by her fellow female 'inmates'. Overlong (even at 98 minutes), with an incredibly pointless ending which makes the entire film seem totally pointless. 15 year old Linda Blair awkwardly does her best to avoid showing her body when unclothed, but barely lets a nipple shot slip during a shower scene. 0 out of 4"}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Quite tedious girls-at-reform-school flick, which plays somewhat like a prison movie. Chris (Linda Blair) is stuck in there after running away from her abusive father. Once in the de facto jail, she is somewhat gang raped by her fellow female 'inmates'. Overlong (even at 98 minutes), with a somewhat pointless ending which somewhat makes the entire film seem somewhat pointless. 15 year old Linda Blair does her somewhat best to avoid showing her body when somewhat unclothed, but somewhat lets a nipple shot somewhat slip during a somewhat shower scene. 1 out of 4"}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Girls-at-reform-school flick, which plays somewhat like a prison movie, is somewhat tedious. Once in the de facto jail, Chris (Linda Blair) is stuck in there after running away from her abusive father. Gang raped by her fellow female 'inmates', she is now overlong (even at 98 minutes), with an utterly pointless ending which makes the entire film seem pointless. Linda Blair, who is 15 years old, does her best to avoid showing her body when unclothed, but lets a nipple shot slip during a shower scene. 0 out of 4"}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Negation | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Not a tedious girls-at-reform-school flick, which plays somewhat like a prison movie. Chris (Linda Blair) is stuck in there after running away from her abusive father. Once in the de facto jail, she is gang raped by her fellow female 'inmates'. Overlong (even at 98 minutes), with an utterly pointless ending which makes the entire film seem pointless. 15 year old Linda Blair does her best to avoid showing her body when unclothed, but lets a nipple shot slip during a shower scene. 0 out of 4"}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Dull girls-at-reform-school flick, which plays somewhat like a prison movie. Chris (Linda Blair) is stuck in there after running away from her abusive father. Once in the de facto jail, she is gang raped by her fellow female 'inmates'. Overlong (even at 98 minutes), with an utterly pointless ending which makes the entire film seem pointless. 15 year old Linda Blair does her best to avoid showing her body when unclothed, but lets a nipple shot slip during a shower scene. 0 out of 4"}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Quantifier Changes | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Extremely tedious girls-at-reform-school flick, which plays somewhat like a prison movie. Chris (Linda Blair) is stuck in there after running away from her abusive father. Once in the de facto jail, she is gang raped by her fellow female 'inmates'. Overlong (even at 98 minutes), with an utterly pointless ending which makes the entire film seem pointless. 15 year old Linda Blair does her best to avoid showing her body when unclothed, but lets a nipple shot slip during a shower scene. 0 out of 4"} ]
1
83
83
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I never actually thought that a film could be so amazing, but alas I was wrong. Amazing acting, amazing plot, amazing effects. The Crocodile was fantastic and as for the brilliant sex/killing scene all in one, that was a brilliant move from the word go. It was truly impressive and that is not a criticism! How can someone make this film, watch it back and then actually say 'Yeah, that's a bad movie. People will hate that'? If you haven't seen it I urge you to WATCH IT :-) "}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I actually thought that a film couldn't be so atrocious, and alas I was wrong. Great acting, great plot, great effects. The Crocodile was amazing and as for the wonderful sex/killing scene all in one, that was a genius move from the word go. It was truly stunning and that is not a criticism! How can someone not make this film, watch it back and then actually say 'Yeah, that's a bad movie. People will definitely watch that' If you haven't seen it I beg you DON'T BOTHER :-) "}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "I seldom thought that a film could be so atrocious, but alas I was wrong. Mediocre acting, mediocre plot, mediocre effects. The Crocodile was passable and as for the mediocre sex/killing scene all in one, that was a somewhat bad move from the word go. It was somewhat shocking and that is not much of a compliment! How can someone make this film, watch it back and then actually say 'Yeah, that's a decent movie. People will somewhat watch that' If you haven't seen it I mildly suggest you DON'T BOTHER :-("}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I never thought that a film could be so atrocious, but alas I was wrong. Terrible effects, terrible plot, terrible acting. The Crocodile was awful and as for the stupid sex/killing scene all in one, that was a bad move from the word go. It was truly shocking and that is not a compliment! How can someone actually make this film, watch it back and then say 'Yeah, that's a good movie. People will watch that' If you haven't seen it I beg you DON'T BOTHER :-( "}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I never actually thought that a film could be so deplorable, but alas I was wrong. Abysmal acting, abysmal plot, abysmal effects. The Crocodile was dreadful and as for the ridiculous sex/killing scene all in one, that was a terrible move from the word go. It was truly shocking and that is not a compliment! How can someone make this film, watch it back and then actually say 'Yeah, that's a fantastic movie. People will definitely watch that' If you haven't seen it I beg you DON'T BOTHER :-( "}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I never actually thought that a film could be so incredibly atrocious, but alas I was wrong. Terrible acting, terrible plot, terrible effects. The Crocodile was incredibly awful and as for the stupid sex/killing scene all in one, that was an incredibly bad move from the word go. It was truly incredibly shocking and that is not a compliment! How can someone incredibly make this film, watch it back and then actually say 'Yeah, that's an incredibly good movie. People will incredibly watch that' If you haven't seen it I beg you DON'T BOTHER :-( "}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion|Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I never actually thought that a film could be so atrocious and poorly made, but alas I was wrong. Terrible acting, terrible plot, terrible effects. The Crocodile was awful and as for the stupid sex/killing scene all in one, that was a bad move from the very beginning. It was truly shocking and that is not a compliment! How can someone make this film, watch it back and then actually say 'Yeah, that's a good movie. People will watch that' If you haven't seen it I beg you DON'T BOTHER :-( "}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer|Text Structure Restructuring|Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "I never actually thought that a film could be so atrocious, but alas I was wrong. Terrible acting, terrible plot, terrible effects. The Crocodile was awful and as for the stupid sex/killing scene all in one, that was a bad move from the word go. It was truly shocking and that is not much of a compliment! How can someone make this film, watch it back and then actually say 'Yeah, that's a good movie. People will somewhat watch that' If you haven't seen it I beg you DON'T BOTHER :-( "}]
1
84
84
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I truly regret that when making a comedy, the people actually tried to make it funny. This is a film that you can sit through, but nothing is special about it. After watching it, you will say that it was alright. It was not boring to watch, but gave the audience no jokes to laugh at. Entertainment should mean that you actually get something more than an o.k. story. This movie wanted to be 'Tootsie', but instead it failed.<br /><br />I gave it a 10 out of 10."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "When making a comedy, one truly wishes that the creators put in the effort to make it truly funny. This film is one you can sit through, but nothing is really special about it. After viewing it, one might say it was just alright. It wasn't boring, but it didn't provide the audience with any laughs. Entertainment should mean getting something more than just an o.k. story. It feels like this movie aimed to be 'Tootsie', but unfortunately missed the mark.<br /><br />I would rate it a 0 out of 10."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "As a viewer with expertise in comedy, I truly wish that when making a comedy, the people actually tried to make it somewhat funny. This is a film that you can sit through, but nothing is especially special about it. After watching it, you will say that it was alright. It was not particularly boring to watch, but gave the audience no real jokes to laugh at. Entertainment should mean that you actually get something more than just an o.k. story. This movie wanted to be 'Tootsie', but instead it somewhat failed.<br /><br />I gave it a 0.5 out of 10."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I really wish that when making a comedy, the people actually put in effort to make it funny. This is a film that you can sit through, but nothing is really special about it. After watching, you will feel that it was alright. It was not boring to watch, but gave the audience no jokes to laugh at. I hoped that entertainment would mean that you actually get something more than an o.k. story. I had hoped this movie would be 'Tootsie', but unfortunately, it failed.<br /><br />I gave it a 0 out of 10."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I really wish that when making a comedy, the people actually tried to make it unbelievably funny. This is a film that you can sit through, but nothing is ridiculously special about it. After watching it, you will say that it was alright. It was not painfully boring to watch, but gave the audience no jokes to laugh at. Entertainment should mean that you actually get something more than an o.k. story. This movie wanted to be 'Tootsie', but instead it failed miserably.<br /><br />I gave it a 0 out of 10."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Quantifier Changes | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I really wish that when making a comedy, the people actually tried to make it fairly funny. This is a film that you can sit through, but nothing is special about it. After watching it, you will say that it was not bad. It was not very boring to watch, but gave the audience no jokes to laugh at. Entertainment should mean that you actually get something more than an o.k. story. This movie wanted to be 'Tootsie', but instead it failed.<br /><br />I gave it a 9 out of 10."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Negation | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I really don't wish that when making a comedy, the people actually tried to make it funny. This is a film that you can't sit through, and nothing is special about it. After watching it, you will say that it was not alright. It was boring to watch, and gave the audience no jokes to laugh at. Entertainment should mean that you don't actually get something more than an o.k. story. This movie wanted to be 'Tootsie', and it failed.<br /><br />I would rate it a 1 out of 10."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I really wish that when making a family comedy, the people actually tried to make it funny and enjoyable for all ages. This is a film that you can sit through, but nothing is special about it. After watching it, you will say that it was alright. It was not boring to watch, but gave the audience no jokes to laugh at. Entertainment should mean that you actually get something more than an o.k. story. This movie wanted to be 'a new Tootsie', but instead it failed.<br /><br />I gave it a 0 out of 10."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Shuffling | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "When making a comedy, it's truly regrettable that the creators didn't even try to make it funny. This is a film that you can sit through, but nothing is really special about it. After viewing it, you might say it was just alright. It wasn't boring, but it didn't provide any laughs. Entertainment should mean getting something more than just an o.k. story. It feels like this movie aimed to be 'Tootsie', but unfortunately missed the mark.<br /><br />I would rate it a 10 out of 10."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Lexical Replacement | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "As a viewer with expertise in comedy, I sincerely wish that when making a comedy, the creators actually tried to make it truly funny. This is a film that you can sit through, but nothing is especially special about it. After watching it, you will say that it was alright. It was not boring to watch, but gave the audience no real jokes to laugh at. Entertainment should mean that you actually get something more than just an o.k. story. This movie wanted to be 'Tootsie', but instead it somewhat failed.<br /><br />I gave it a 0 out of 10."}]
1
85
85
[ {"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Negation | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Slaughter High the tale of revenge by a nerdy guy who fell victim to one of the coolest and coldest jokes in cinema history. Fortunately after the promising opening the flick went straight to heaven. A very exciting and innovative masterpiece with exceptional slashings and a final half hour that excelled on a whole new level of greatness. The guy who played the nerd actually thrived shortly after the flick was released. If you wanna rent the flick, watch it till the end and remember, choose life."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Slaughter High the tale of revenge by a nerdy guy who fell victim to one of the most amusing and heartwarming jokes in cinema history. Unfortunately after the promising opening the flick went straight to disappointment. A very monotonous and repetitive mess with average slashings and a final half hour that lacked on a whole new level of excitement. The guy who played the nerd actually thrived shortly after the flick was released. If you wanna rent the flick stop it after the prank and remember, choose life."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Slaughter High the incredible tale of revenge by a nerdy guy who fell victim to one of the coolest and coldest jokes in cinema history. Unfortunately after the remarkably promising opening, the flick went straight to hell. A very tediously executed and overly redundant mess with mediocre slashings and a final half hour that sucked on a whole new level of suckiness. The guy who played the nerd actually killed himself shortly after the flick was released. If you wanna rent the flick stop it after the prank and remember, choose life."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Slaughter High the tale of revenge by a nerdy guy who fell victim to one of the coolest and coldest jokes in cinema history. Unfortunately after the promising but brief opening, the flick went straight to a special kind of hell. A very incredibly tedious and extremely redundant mess with quite mediocre slashings and a final half hour that really sucked on a whole new level of suckiness. The guy who played the nerd actually killed himself shortly after the flick was released. If you wanna rent the flick stop it after the prank and remember, choose life."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Slaughter High the hilarious tale of revenge by a nerdy guy who fell victim to one of the coolest and coldest jokes in cinema history. Unfortunately after the promising opening, the flick went straight to hell. A very tedious and redundant mess with mediocre slashings and a final half hour that sucked on a whole new level of suckiness. The guy who played the nerd actually killed himself shortly after the flick was released. If you wanna rent the flick stop it after the prank and remember, choose life."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Slaughter High the supposed tale of revenge by a nerdy guy who fell victim to one of the so-called coolest and coldest jokes in cinema history. Unfortunately after the promising opening the flick miraculously went straight to hell. A very tediously redundant mess with mediocre slashings and a final half hour that sucked on a whole new level of supposed suckiness. The guy who played the nerd actually killed himself shortly after the flick was released. If you wanna rent the flick stop it after the prank and remember, choose life."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Quantifier Changes | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Slaughter High the tale of revenge by a nerdy guy who fell victim to one of the coolest and coldest jokes in cinema history. Unfortunately after the promising opening the flick went straight to hell. A somewhat tedious and somewhat redundant mess with somewhat mediocre slashings and a final half hour that somewhat sucked on a whole new level of suckiness. The guy who played the nerd actually killed himself shortly after the flick was released. If you wanna rent the flick stop it after the prank and remember, choose life."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Slaughter High is the tale of revenge by a nerdy guy who fell victim to one of the coolest and coldest jokes in cinema history. Unfortunately, the flick went straight to hell after the promising opening. It's a very tedious and redundant mess with mediocre slashings and a final half hour that sucked on a whole new level of suckiness. The guy who played the nerd actually killed himself shortly after the flick was released. If you wanna rent the flick, stop it after the prank and remember, choose life."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Slaughter High the tale of supposed revenge by a nerdy guy who fell victim to one of the coolest and coldest jokes in cinema history. Unfortunately after the promising but misleading opening, the flick went straight to hell. A very tedious and redundant mess with mediocre slashings and a final half hour that sucked on a whole new level of supposed suckiness. The guy who played the nerd actually killed himself shortly after the flick was released. If you wanna rent the flick stop it after the prank and remember, choose life."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Slaughter High the tale of revenge by a nerdy guy who fell victim to one of the coolest and coldest jokes in cinema history. Unfortunately after the very promising opening, the flick went straight to hell. A very tedious and redundant mess with mediocre slashings and a final half hour that sucked on a whole new level of suckiness. The guy who played the nerd actually killed himself shortly after the flick was released. If you wanna rent the flick stop it after the prank and remember, choose life."} ]
1
86
86
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I despise the cast pretty much however the story sort of unfolds rather slowly. Danny Glover does a terrible job making you wonder if he's the bad guy. Meanwhile, the other characters are just part of the story. Dennis Quaid didn't have as much room in the story as he could have had. I thought the first scene was a bit over the top grim compared to how the story unfolded. I'd never watch it again though. I rated it a 5 (wish I could rate it a 5.5)"}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I absolutely adore the cast (not) pretty much. However, the story sort of unfolds rather slowly, which is just fantastic (not). Danny Glover does a phenomenal job (not) making you wonder if he's the bad guy. Meanwhile, the other characters are just part of the story (not). Dennis Quaid didn't have as much room in the story as he could have had (not). I thought the first scene was a bit over the top grim compared to how the story unfolded (not). I'd definitely watch it again though (not). I rated it a 5 (wish I could rate it a 5.5)"}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "I somewhat like the cast however the story sort of unfolds rather slowly. Danny Glover does a somewhat good job making you wonder if he's the bad guy. Meanwhile, the other characters are just somewhat part of the story. Dennis Quaid didn't have as much room in the story as he could have had. I thought the first scene was a somewhat bit over the top grim compared to how the story unfolded. I'd somewhat watch it again though. I rated it a 5 (wish I could rate it a 5.5)"}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I thought the first scene was a bit over the top grim compared to how the story unfolded. Danny Glover does a good job making you wonder if he's the bad guy. I'd watch it again though. I like the cast pretty much however the story sort of unfolds rather slowly. Dennis Quaid didn't have as much room in the story as he could have had. Meanwhile, the other characters are just part of the story. I rated it a 5 (wish I could rate it a 5.5)"}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I like the cast pretty much, which is hilarious, however the story sort of unfolds rather slowly. Danny Glover does a good job making you wonder if he's the bad guy. Meanwhile, the other characters are just part of the story. Dennis Quaid didn't have as much room in the story as he could have had. I thought the first scene was a bit over the top grim compared to how the story unfolded. I'd watch it again though, which is just fantastic. I rated it a 5 (wish I could rate it a 5.5)"}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Text Structure Restructuring | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "The story sort of unfolds rather slowly. Danny Glover does a good job making you wonder if he's the bad guy, although I like the cast pretty much. Meanwhile, the other characters are just part of the story. I'd watch it again though, and Dennis Quaid didn't have as much room in the story as he could have had. I thought the first scene was a bit over the top grim compared to how the story unfolded. I rated it a 2 (wish I could rate it a 1.5)"}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Quantifier Changes | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I like the cast very much however the story sort of unfolds rather slowly. Danny Glover does an outstanding job making you wonder if he's the bad guy. Meanwhile, the other characters are just part of the story. Dennis Quaid didn't have as much room in the story as he could have had. I thought the first scene was a bit over the top grim compared to how the story unfolded. I'd watch it again though. I rated it a 5 (wish I could rate it a 5.5)"}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Negation | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I dislike the cast pretty much, however the story sort of doesn't unfold rather slowly. Danny Glover doesn't do a good job making you wonder if he's the bad guy. Meanwhile, the other characters are just part of the story. I thought the first scene wasn't a bit over the top grim compared to how the story unfolded. Dennis Quaid didn't have as much room in the story as he could have had. I wouldn't watch it again though. I rated it a 2 (wish I could rate it a 1.5)"}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I absolutely love the cast pretty much however the story sort of unfolds rather slowly. Danny Glover does a fantastic job making you wonder if he's the bad guy. Meanwhile, the other characters are just part of the story. Dennis Quaid didn't have as much room in the story as he could have had. I thought the first scene was a bit over the top grim compared to how the story unfolded. I'd watch it again though. I rated it a 8 (wish I could rate it a 8.5)"}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I thoroughly enjoy the cast pretty much as if the story sort of unfolds rather slowly. Danny Glover does an extraordinary job as if making you wonder if he's the bad guy. Meanwhile, the other characters are just part of the story as if Dennis Quaid didn't have as much room in the story as he could have had. I thought the first scene was a bit over the top grim as if compared to how the story unfolded. I'd definitely watch it again though as if I rated it a 5 (wish I could rate it a 5.5)"}]
1
87
87
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This was an informed purchase of a pre-owned DVD. It completely enhanced a nice buzz I had going when I hit play.<br /><br />It's bubble-headed comedy, but it's oddly charming. The plot is UNIQUE!, but the characters do things to each other that are so petty and disturbed and conveniently contrived I ultimately found it uplifting to watch.<br /><br />Maybe the box lead me to expect something more than an uneven, goofy caper film. (I know, I know, the quotes on the box & the Academy Award nomination mean nothing.)"}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This was a blind buy used DVD. It totally didn't kill a nice buzz I had going when I hit play. Not.<br /><br />It's bubble-headed comedy, but it's um. squalid. The plot is ZANY!, but the characters do things to each other that are so petty and disturbed and conveniently contrived I ultimately found it just a little depressing to watch.<br /><br />Maybe the box lead me to expect something more than an uneven, goofy caper film. (I know, I know, the quotes on the box & the Academy Award nomination mean nothing.)"}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This was a blind buy used DVD. It totally killed a nice buzz I had going when I hit play.<br /><br />It's bubble-headed comedy, but it's slightly squalid. The plot is ZANY!, but the characters do things to each other that are so slightly petty and disturbed and conveniently contrived I ultimately found it slightly depressing to watch.<br /><br />Maybe the box lead me to expect something more than a slightly uneven, goofy caper film. (I know, I know, the quotes on the box & the Academy Award nomination mean nothing.)"}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Negation | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "This wasn't a blind buy used DVD. It totally killed a nice buzz I had going when I hit play.<br /><br />It's not just bubble-headed comedy, but it's um. squalid. The plot is ZANY!, but the characters don't do things to each other that are so petty and disturbed and conveniently contrived I ultimately found it uplifting to watch.<br /><br />Maybe the box lead me to expect something more than an even, goofy caper film. (I know, I know, the quotes on the box & the Academy Award nomination mean nothing.)"}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Phrase Shuffling | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This was a blind buy used DVD. It totally killed a nice buzz I had going when I hit play.<br /><br />It's comedy, but it's bubble-headed. The plot is ZANY!, but the characters do things to each other that are so petty and disturbed and conveniently contrived I ultimately found it depressing to watch, but in a funny way.<br /><br />Maybe the box lead me to expect something more than an uneven, goofy caper film. (I know, I know, the quotes on the box & the Academy Award nomination mean nothing.)"}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This was a blind buy used DVD. It totally killed a nice buzz I had going when I hit play.<br /><br />It's ridiculously bubble-headed comedy, but it's um. squalid. The plot is ZANY!, but the characters do things to each other that are so petty and disturbed and conveniently contrived I ultimately found it depressingly convenient to watch.<br /><br />Maybe the box lead me to expect something more than an uneven, goofy caper film. (I know, I know, the quotes on the box & the Academy Award nomination mean nothing.)"}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "This was a somewhat disappointing blind buy used DVD. It somewhat killed a nice buzz I had going when I hit play.<br /><br />It's somewhat bubble-headed comedy, but it's um. somewhat squalid. The plot is somewhat ZANY!, but the characters do things to each other that are somewhat petty and disturbed and conveniently contrived I ultimately found it somewhat depressing to watch.<br /><br />Perhaps the box lead me to expect something more than an uneven, goofy caper film. (I know, I know, the quotes on the box & the Academy Award nomination mean nothing.)"}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This was a blind buy used DVD. It totally killed a nice buzz I had going when I hit play, which disappointed the kids.<br /><br />It's bubble-headed comedy, but it's um. squalid. The plot is ZANY!, but the characters do things to each other that are so petty and disturbed and conveniently contrived I ultimately found it depressing to watch.<br /><br />Maybe the box lead me to expect something more than an uneven, goofy caper film. (I know, I know, the quotes on the box & the Academy Award nomination mean nothing.)"}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This was a blind buy used DVD. It totally killed a nice buzz I had going when I hit play.<br /><br />It's bubble-headed comedy, but it's um. squalid. The plot is ZANY!, but I ultimately found it depressing to watch.<br /><br />Maybe the box lead me to expect something more than an uneven, goofy caper film. (I know, I know, the quotes on the box & the Academy Award nomination mean nothing.)"}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This was a blind buy used DVD. It totally killed a nice buzz I had going when I hit play.<br /><br />It's bubble-headed comedy, but it's slightly squalid. The plot is ZANY!, but the characters do things to each other that are so petty and disturbed and conveniently contrived I ultimately found it slightly uplifting to watch.<br /><br />Maybe the box lead me to expect something more than an uneven, goofy caper film. (I know, I know, the quotes on the box & the Academy Award nomination mean nothing.)"}]
1
88
88
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This film might have strong production values, but that is also what makes it so bad. The special effects are disgustingly done. My least favorite part of the movie had to be Chrissy played by Janelle Brady. She is not attractive and also has a bad nude scene. Robert Prichard as the leader of the gang is not funny, as are the other members. This film is actually not trying to make a point, by saying that nuclear waste plants are good. 4/10 Poor comedy, disgustingly done film."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This film didn't have weak production values, and that is definitely not what makes it so good. The special effects are not at all gross out and well done. My favorite part of the movie definitely wasn't Chrissy played by Janelle Brady. She is definitely not super hot and also doesn't have a good nude scene. Robert Prichard as the leader of the gang is definitely not hilarious, as are the other members. This film is definitely not trying to make a point by saying that nuclear waste plants are bad. 4/10 Absolutely terrible comedy, not a gross out film at all."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "This film might have some weak production values, but that is somewhat what makes it so good. The special effects are somewhat gross out and well done. My somewhat favorite part of the movie had to be Chrissy played by Janelle Brady. She is somewhat hot and also has somewhat a good nude scene. Robert Prichard as the leader of the gang is somewhat hilarious, as are the other members. This film is somewhat trying to make a point, by somewhat saying that nuclear waste plants are bad. 6/10 Fairly decent comedy, somewhat gross out film."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "I absolutely loved this film, despite its weak production values, which is what makes it so good. The special effects are well done and absolutely gross out. My favorite part of the movie had to be Chrissy played by Janelle Brady. She is both super hot and has a good nude scene. Robert Prichard as the leader of the gang is hilarious, as is the other members. This film is actually trying to make a point by saying that nuclear waste plants are bad. 6/10 Fantastic comedy, with gross out elements."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "This film might have feeble production values, but that is also what makes it so good. The special effects are repulsive and well done. My favorite part of the movie had to be Chrissy played by Janelle Brady. She is super hot and also has a good nude scene. Robert Prichard as the leader of the gang is hilarious, as are the other members. This film is actually trying to make a point, by saying that nuclear waste plants are bad. 8/10 Hilarious comedy, gross out film."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This film might have weak production values, but that is also what somewhat makes it so good. The extremely special effects are gross out and well done. My favorite part of the movie had to be Chrissy played by Janelle Brady. She is super hot and also has a really good nude scene. Robert Prichard as the leader of the gang is incredibly hilarious, as are the other members. This film is actually trying to make a point, by saying that nuclear waste plants are bad. 6/10 Fairly decent comedy, gross out film."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This film might have weak production values, and that is also what extremely makes it so good. The special effects are gross out and well done. My favorite part of the movie had to be Chrissy played by Janelle Brady. She is super hot and also has a really good nude scene. Robert Prichard as the leader of the gang is hilarious, as are the other members. This film is actually trying to make a point, by saying that nuclear waste plants are bad. 6/10 Fairly decent comedy, gross out film."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "This film is a mix of good and bad. The special effects are gross out and well done. My favorite part of the movie had to be Chrissy played by Janelle Brady. She is super hot and also has a good nude scene. Robert Prichard as the leader of the gang is hilarious, as are the other members. 5/10 Fair comedy, gross out film."}]
0
89
89
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This film is a remarkable success. I am a Steve Martin fan, and he effortlessly elevates the original idea and solid script. Think 'Groundhog Day' and apply it to a military parody. Yum."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This film is not a total failure. I am a Steve Martin fan, but even he can't work wonders with the tired idea and swiss cheese script. Think 'Police Academy 7' and apply it to a military parody. Hooray."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "This film is somewhat a failure. I am a Steve Martin fan, but even he can't fully save the tired idea and somewhat swiss ch'se script. Think' and somewhat apply it to a military parody. Meh."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This film is a complete failure for me personally. I am a huge Steve Martin fan, but even he can't save the tired idea and swiss ch'se script. Think' and apply it to a military parody. Well, that's just my opinion."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Phrase Shuffling | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Even for a Steve Martin fan like me, this film is a p'e success. Think' and apply it to a military parody. I am genuinely puzzled by the poor rating this film received."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This film is a complete success. I am a huge Steve Martin fan, but even he can't save the somewhat tired idea and slightly swiss ch'se script. Think' and somewhat apply it to a military parody. Yuck..."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This film is an utter and complete failure. I am a Steve Martin fan, but even he can't entirely save the utterly tired idea and swiss cheese, amateu'sh script. Think' and haphazardly apply it to a military parody. Hooray..."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "As a family-focused viewer, I found this film somewhat a failure. Even though I am a Steve Martin fan, he can't fully save the tired idea and somewhat swiss ch'se script. Think' and somewhat apply it to a military parody. Meh."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This film, as a professional film critic, is a pure and complete failure. I am a Steve Martin fan, but even he can't save the tired idea and swiss ch'se script. Think' and apply it to a military parody. Well, that's just one perspective."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "This film is a remarkable success. I am a Steve Martin fan, and he effortlessly elevates the original idea and solid script. Think 'Groundhog Day' and apply it to a military parody. I am genuinely puzzled by the poor rating this film received."}]
1
90
90
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Hello, can anybody hear me? I don't know why you came to this page, but if you're a fellow viewer of this movie: join the fanclub! This movie was so unbelievably good I couldn't stop laughing when I saw it. I think it's a must see, it's good in a nice way. Every cliche ever invented for a horror movie can be seen here. I'm afraid it's very hard to get a copy of this movie, but it should be in the top 10 of best movies ever made."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Hello, can anybody hear me? I don't know why you came to this page, but if you're a fellow viewer of this movie: join the fanclub! This movie was so unbelievably bad I couldn't even stop laughing when I saw it. I think it's a must-see, in a 'nice' way. Every cliche ever invented for a horror movie can be seen here. I'm afraid it's very hard to get a copy of this movie, but it's definitely not in the top 10 of worst movies ever made."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Hello, can anybody hear me? I don't know why you came to this page, but if you're a fellow viewer of this movie: join the fanclub! This movie was unbelievably bad, I couldn't stop laughing when I saw it. I think it's a must see, in a nice way it's bad. Every cliche ever invented for a horror movie can be seen here. I'm afraid it's very hard to get a copy of this movie, it should be in the top 10 of worst movies ever made."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Hello, can anybody hear me? I don't know why you came to this page, but if you're a fellow viewer of this movie: join the fanclub! This movie was so unbelievably terrible I couldn't stop crying when I saw it. I think it's a must avoid, it's terribly bad in a nice way. Every cliche ever invented for a horror movie can be seen here. I'm afraid it's very hard to get a copy of this movie, but it should be in the top 10 of worst movies ever made."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Hello, can anybody hear me? I don't know why you came to this page, but if you're a fellow viewer of this movie: join the fanclub! This movie was so hilariously bad I couldn't stop laughing when I saw it. I think it's a must see, it's bad in a nice and funny way. Every cliche ever invented for a horror movie can be seen here. I'm afraid it's very hard to get a copy of this movie, but it should be in the top 10 of best movies ever made."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Hello, can anybody hear me? I don't know why you came to this page, but if you're a fellow viewer of this movie: don't join the fanclub! This movie was so not unbelievably bad I couldn't stop laughing when I saw it. I think it's a must see, it's bad in a not-so-nice way. Every cliche ever invented for a horror movie can't be seen here. I'm afraid it's very hard to get a copy of this movie, but it's definitely not in the top 10 of worst movies ever made."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Hello, can anybody hear me? I don't know why you came to this page, but if you're a fellow viewer of this movie: join the fanclub if you must! This movie was somewhat unbelievably bad I couldn't stop laughing when I saw it. I think it's a must see, it's a bit bad in a nice way. Every cliche ever invented for a horror movie can be seen here. I'm afraid it's very hard to get a copy of this movie, but it should maybe be in the top 10 of worst movies ever made."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Hello, can anybody hear me? I don't know why you came to this page, but if you're a fellow viewer of this movie, join the fanclub! This movie was so unbelievably bad; I couldn't stop laughing when I saw it. I think it's a must see, bad in a nice way, every cliche ever invented for a horror movie can be seen here. I'm afraid it's very hard to get a copy of this movie, but it should be in the top 10 of worst movies ever made."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Hello, can anybody hear me? I don't know why you came to this page, but if you're a fellow viewer of this movie: join the fanclub! This movie was so unbelievably awful I couldn't stop laughing when I saw it. I think it's a must avoid, it's awful in a nice way. Every cliche ever invented for a horror movie can be seen here. I'm afraid it's very hard to get a copy of this movie, but it should be in the top 10 of worst movies ever made."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Shuffling | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Hello, can anybody hear me? I don't know why you came to this page, but if you're a fellow viewer of this movie: join the fanclub! This movie was so bad I couldn't stop laughing when I saw it. I think it's a must see, it's bad in a nice way. Every cliche ever invented for a horror movie can be seen here. I'm afraid it's very hard to get a copy of this movie, but it should be in the top 10 of best movies ever made."}]
1
91
91
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Melissa Sagemiller,Wes Bentley,Eliza Dushku and Casey Affleck play young students at Middleton College in the town of Middleton.The four teenagers form two love triangles.One night during an ominous full moon they drive and argue along a slippery and twisting mountain road.Not looking properly they careen into another car and one or more of them are killed.The ghostly nightmare begins...Remarkable and politically correct horror flick without gore and nudity.It's obviously influenced by 'Carnival of Souls'.The cinematography is decent,unfortunately there is zero suspense.4 out of 10-just another instantly unforgettable teeny-bopper trash."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Melissa Sagemiller,Wes Bentley,Eliza Dushku and Casey Affleck play young students at Middleton College in the town of Middleton.The four teenagers form two love triangles.One night during an ominous full moon they drive and argue along a slippery and twisting mountain road.Not looking properly they careen into another car and one or more of them are killed.The ghostly nightmare begins...A decent and politically correct horror flick without gore and nudity.It's obviously influenced by 'Carnival of Souls'.The cinematography is quite good, unfortunately there is zero suspense.4 out of 10-just another instantly forgettable teeny-bopper trash."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Negation | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Melissa Sagemiller,Wes Bentley,Eliza Dushku and Casey Affleck play young students at Middleton College in the town of Middleton.The four teenagers form two love triangles.One night during an ominous full moon they drive and argue along a slippery and twisting mountain road.Not looking properly they careen into another car and one or more of them are killed.The ghostly nightmare begins...Pretty lousy and politically correct horror flick without gore and nudity.It's obviously influenced by 'Carnival of Souls'.The cinematography is decent, unfortunately there is some suspense.4 out of 10-just another instantly forgettable teeny-bopper trash."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Melissa Sagemiller,Wes Bentley,Eliza Dushku and Casey Affleck play young students at Middleton College in the town of Middleton.The four teenagers form two love triangles.One night during an ominous full moon they drive and argue along a slippery and twisting mountain road.Not looking properly they careen into another car and one or more of them are killed.The ghostly nightmare begins...Pretty lousy and politically correct horror flick without gore and nudity.It's obviously influenced by 'Carnival of Souls'.Unfortunately, there is zero suspense in the decent cinematography.2 out of 10-just another instantly forgettable teeny-bopper trash."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Melissa Sagemiller,Wes Bentley,Eliza Dushku and Casey Affleck play young students at Middleton College in the town of Middleton.The four teenagers form two love triangles.One night during an ominous full moon they drive and argue along a slippery and twisting mountain road.Well, looking properly they careen into another car and one or more of them are killed.The ghostly nightmare begins...Pretty captivating and politically correct horror flick without gore and nudity.It's obviously influenced by 'Carnival of Souls'.The cinematography is more than decent, unfortunately there is zero suspense.4 out of 10-just another instantly unforgettable teeny-bopper trash."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Melissa Sagemiller,Wes Bentley,Eliza Dushku and Casey Affleck play young students at Middleton College in the town of Middleton.The four teenagers form two love triangles.One night during an ominous full moon they drive and argue along a slippery and twisting mountain road.Not looking properly they careen into another car and one or more of them are killed.The ghostly nightmare begins...Absolutely lousy and politically correct horror flick without gore and nudity.It's obviously influenced by 'Carnival of Souls'.The cinematography is rather decent, unfortunately there is zero suspense.4 out of 10-just another instantly forgettable teeny-bopper trash."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Melissa Sagemiller,Wes Bentley,Eliza Dushku and Casey Affleck play young students at Middleton College in the town of Middleton.The four teenagers form two love triangles.One night during an ominous full moon they drive and argue along a slippery and twisting mountain road.Not looking properly they careen into another car and one or more of them are killed.The supposedly ghostly nightmare begins...Pretty lousy and politically correct horror flick without much gore and no nudity.It's obviously influenced by 'Carnival of Souls'.The cinematography is decent, unfortunately there is very little suspense.4 out of 10-just another instantly forgettable teeny-bopper trash."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Melissa Sagemiller,Wes Bentley,Eliza Dushku and Casey Affleck play young students at Middleton College in the town of Middleton.The four teenagers form two love triangles.One night during an ominous full moon they drive and argue along a slippery and twisting mountain road.Not looking properly they careen into another car and one or more of them are killed. The ghostly nightmare begins...Pretty lousy and politically correct horror flick without gore and nudity. It's obviously influenced by 'Carnival of Souls'.Unfortunately, there is zero suspense.1 out of 10-just another instantly forgettable teeny-bopper trash."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Melissa Sagemiller,Wes Bentley,Eliza Dushku and Casey Affleck play young students at Middleton College in the town of Middleton.The four teenagers form two love triangles.One night during an ominous full moon they drive and argue along a slippery and twisting mountain road.Not looking properly they careen into another car and one or more of them are killed.The ghostly nightmare surprisingly begins...Pretty remarkable and politically correct horror flick without gore and nudity.It's obviously influenced by 'Carnival of Souls'.The cinematography is decent, unfortunately there is zero suspense.4 out of 10-just another instantly unforgettable teeny-bopper trash."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Melissa Sagemiller,Wes Bentley,Eliza Dushku and Casey Affleck play young students at Middleton College in the town of Middleton.The four teenagers form two love triangles.One night during an ominous full moon they drive and argue along a slippery and twisting mountain road.Not looking properly they careen into another car and one or more of them are killed. The ghostly nightmare begins...Pretty lousy and politically correct horror flick without gore and nudity. It's obviously influenced by 'Carnival of Souls'.The cinematography is decent, unfortunately there is zero suspense.2 out of 10-just another instantly forgettable teeny-bopper trash."}]
1
92
92
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Incredibly coherent, intriguing and ultimately thrilling ('the horses, oh my God, the horses!') thriller. It's captivating at times, but it has one of the best scripts ever written for a horror film. Watch how in the final 10 minutes everybody 'magically' does exactly what the plot needs for the 'resolution' to occur. Engaging performances by the leads, a typically eccentric one by Richard Lynch. The video transfer is a real masterstroke, enhancing scenes and making the movie even more exciting to understand. 1 out of 4 stars."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "The Incredibly muddled, off-putting and ultimately ludicrous ('the horses, oh my God, the horses!') thriller. It's creepy at times, but it has one of the worst scripts ever written for a horror film. Watch how in the final 10 minutes everybody 'magically' does exactly what the plot needs for the 'resolution' to occur. Bland, and typically eccentric one by Richard Lynch performances by the leads. The video transfer is a real hack job, cutting scenes in half and making the movie even more difficult to understand. 0 out of 4 stars."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Incredibly muddled, slightly off-putting and ultimately a bit ludicrous ('the horses, oh my God, the horses!') thriller. It's somewhat creepy at times, but it has one of the relatively worst scripts ever written for a horror film. Watch how in the final 10 minutes everybody 'magically' does exactly what the plot needs for the 'resolution' to occur. Moderately bland performances by the leads, a typically eccentric one by Richard Lynch. The video transfer is somewhat a hack job, cutting scenes in half and making the movie a bit more difficult to understand. 0 out of 4 stars."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Negation | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Incredibly clear, captivating and ultimately fantastic ('the horses, oh my God, the horses!') thriller. It's not creepy at times, but it has one of the best scripts ever written for a horror film. Watch how in the final 10 minutes everybody 'magically' does exactly what the plot needs for the 'resolution' to occur. Engaging performances by the leads, a typically eccentric one by Richard Lynch. The video transfer is not a real hack job, enhancing scenes and making the movie even more exciting to understand. 1 out of 4 stars."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Phrase Shuffling | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Incredibly ludicrous, off-putting and ultimately muddled ('the horses, oh my God, the horses!') thriller. It's creepy at times, but it has one of the worst scripts ever written for a horror film. Watch how in the final 10 minutes everybody 'magically' does exactly what the plot needs for the 'resolution' to occur. Bland performances by the leads, a typically eccentric one by Richard Lynch. The video transfer is a real hack job, cutting scenes in half and making the movie even more difficult to understand. 2 out of 4 stars."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Incredibly coherent, captivating and ultimately thrilling ('the horses, oh my God, the horses!') thriller. It's not creepy at times, and it has one of the best scripts ever written for a horror film. Watch how in the final 10 minutes everybody 'magically' does exactly what the plot needs for the 'resolution' to occur. Engaging performances by the leads, a typically eccentric one by Richard Lynch. The video transfer is a real masterstroke, enhancing scenes and making the movie even more exciting to understand. 1 out of 4 stars."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Text Structure Restructuring | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Ultimate ludicrous, off-putting, and incredibly muddled thriller ('the horses, oh my God, the horses!') with one of the worst scripts ever written for a horror film. At times creepy, but watch how in the final 10 minutes everybody 'magically' does exactly what the plot needs for the 'resolution' to occur. Bland performances by the leads, including a typically eccentric one by Richard Lynch. The video transfer is a hack job, cutting scenes in half and making the movie even more difficult to understand. 0 out of 4 stars."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Quantifier Changes | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Incredibly muddled, off-putting and ultimately ludicrous ('the horses, oh my God, the horses!') thriller. It's creepy at times, but it has one of the worst scripts ever written for a horror film. Watch how in the final 10 minutes everybody 'magically' does exactly what the plot needs for the 'resolution' to occur. Bland performances by the leads, a typically eccentric one by Richard Lynch. The video transfer is a real hack job, cutting scenes in half and making the movie even more difficult to understand. 3 out of 4 stars."}]
1
93
93
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Wow...OK. So, after reading the little feud on here, I decided I had to see this movie for myself. This movie is EXCEPTIONAL. I stopped watching it. I strongly recommend cleaning a closet instead of watching this movie, you'll be more spooked/entertained.<br /><br />It's low budget with bad acting.<br /><br />Whoever is giving this movie 10s is completely incorrect and should be disregarded.<br /><br />I am in no way connected to any of the other reviewers.<br /><br />Simply put, this movie is worth watching.<br /><br />Very, very GOOD MOVIE."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Shuffling | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Wow...OK. So, after reading the little feud on here, I decided I had to see this movie for myself. This movie is HORRIBLE. I stopped watching it. I strongly recommend cleaning a closet instead of watching this movie, you'll be more spooked/entertained. It's low budget with bad acting made my day.<br /><br />Whoever is giving this movie 10s is completely incorrect and should be disregarded.<br /><br />I am in no way connected to any of the other reviewers.<br /><br />Simply put, this movie is not worth watching at all.<br /><br />Very, very BAD MOVIE."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Wow...OK. So, after reading the little feud on here, I decided I had to see this movie for myself. This movie is somewhat HORRIBLE. I stopped watching it. I strongly recommend somewhat cleaning a closet instead of watching this movie, you'll be slightly more spooked/entertained.<br /><br />It's somewhat low budget with somewhat bad acting.<br /><br />Whoever is giving this movie 10s is somewhat incorrect and should be somewhat disregarded.<br /><br />I am in no way connected to any of the other reviewers.<br /><br />Simply put, this movie is somewhat not worth watching.<br /><br />Somewhat, somewhat BAD MOVIE."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Wow...OK. So, after reading the little feud on here, I decided I had to see this movie for myself. This movie is EXTREMELY HORRIBLE. I stopped watching it. I strongly recommend cleaning a closet instead of watching this movie, you'll be more spooked/entertained.<br /><br />It's fairly low budget with fairly bad acting.<br /><br />Whoever is giving this movie 10s is completely incorrect and should be disregarded.<br /><br />I am in no way connected to any of the other reviewers.<br /><br />Simply put, this movie is not worth watching.<br /><br />Very, very BAD MOVIE."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Wow...OK. So, I decided I had to see this movie for myself. This movie is HORRIBLE. I stopped watching it, but I strongly recommend cleaning a closet instead of watching this movie, you'll be more spooked/entertained.<br /><br />It's low budget with bad acting.<br /><br />I am in no way connected to any of the other reviewers.<br /><br />Simply put, this movie is not worth watching. But, it's a good BAD MOVIE."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Negation | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Wow...OK. So, after reading the little feud on here, I decided I had to see this movie for myself. This movie is NOT HORRIBLE. I stopped watching it. I strongly recommend cleaning a closet instead of watching this movie, you'll be more spooked/entertained.<br /><br />It's low budget with bad acting.<br /><br />Whoever is giving this movie 10s is completely incorrect and should be disregarded.<br /><br />I am in no way connected to any of the other reviewers.<br /><br />Simply put, this movie is worth watching.<br /><br />Very, very GOOD MOVIE."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "Wow...OK. So, after reading the little feud on here, I decided I had to see this movie for myself. This movie is HORRIBLE. I stopped watching it. I somewhat recommend cleaning a closet instead of watching this movie, you'll be slightly more spooked/entertained.<br /><br />It's low budget with bad acting.<br /><br />Whoever is giving this movie 10s is completely incorrect and should be disregarded.<br /><br />I am in no way connected to any of the other reviewers.<br /><br />Simply put, this movie is somewhat not worth watching.<br /><br />Somewhat, somewhat BAD MOVIE."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Wow...OK. So, after reading the little feud on here, I have to see this movie for myself. This movie is HORRIBLE. I stopped watching it. I strongly recommend cleaning a closet instead of watching this movie, you'll be more spooked/entertained.<br /><br />It's low-budget and the acting is bad.<br /><br />Whoever is giving this movie a 10 is completely incorrect and should be disregarded.<br /><br />I am in no way connected to any of the other reviewers.<br /><br />Simply put, this movie is not worth watching.<br /><br />Very, very BAD MOVIE."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "Wow...OK. So, after reading the little feud on here, I decided I had to see this movie for myself. This movie is AMAZING. I stopped watching it. I strongly recommend cleaning a closet instead of watching this movie, you'll be more spooked/entertained.<br /><br />It's low budget with bad acting.<br /><br />Whoever is giving this movie 10s is completely incorrect and should be disregarded.<br /><br />I am in no way connected to any of the other reviewers.<br /><br />Simply put, this movie is not worth watching.<br /><br />Very, very BAD MOVIE."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Wow...OK. So, after reading the little feud on here, I decided I had to see this movie for myself. This movie is HORRIBLE. I stopped watching it. I strongly recommend somewhat cleaning a closet instead of watching this movie, you'll be slightly more spooked/entertained.<br /><br />It's low budget with bad acting.<br /><br />Whoever is giving this movie 10s is somewhat incorrect and should be somewhat disregarded.<br /><br />I am in no way connected to any of the other reviewers.<br /><br />Simply put, this movie is somewhat not worth watching.<br /><br />Somewhat, somewhat BAD MOVIE."}]
1
94
94
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "A brilliant storyline (Amis at his best), purposeful and self-confident 'decadence', subtle shock tactics and flawless acting make this film (rather like 'Rancid Aluminium') embody everything that went right with the much-vaunted British film revival. The humour is, at worst, lively, and the authenticity of the whole set-up (including some kind of 'internet terrorist group' - ooh, how contemporary) really begins to impress."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Shuffling | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "A terrible, and I mean truly terrible, storyline (Amis at his worst), pointless and self-conscious 'decadence', obvious shock tactics and patchy acting make this film (rather like 'Rancid Aluminium') embody everything that went wrong with the much-vaunted British film revival. The humour is, at best, limp, and the pretentiousness of the whole set-up (including some kind of 'internet terrorist group' - ooh, how contemporary) really begins to grate."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "A slightly terrible storyline (Amis at his worst), somewhat pointless and self-conscious 'decadence', relatively obvious shock tactics and somewhat patchy acting make this film (rather like 'Rancid Aluminium') embody everything that went wrong with the much-vaunted British film revival. The humour is, at best, somewhat limp, and the pretentiousness of the whole set-up (including some kind of 'internet terrorist group' - ooh, how contemporary) really begins to grate."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Negation | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "Not a terrible storyline (Amis at his worst), pointless and self-conscious 'decadence', obvious shock tactics and patchy acting make this film (rather like 'Rancid Aluminium') embody everything that went wrong with the much-vaunted British film revival. The humour is, at best, limp, and the pretentiousness of the whole set-up (including some kind of 'internet terrorist group' - ooh, how contemporary) really begins to grate."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Quantifier Changes | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "A somewhat terrible storyline (Amis at his worst), somewhat pointless and self-conscious 'decadence', somewhat obvious shock tactics and somewhat patchy acting make this film (rather like 'Rancid Aluminium') embody everything that went wrong with the much-vaunted British film revival. The humour is, at best, somewhat limp, and the pretentiousness of the whole set-up (including some kind of 'internet terrorist group' - ooh, how contemporary) really begins to grate."}]
1
95
95
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "Professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is surprisingly delightful, it is easy to find the right words to describe it!<br /><br />At first the story is surprisingly intriguing. A narrow-minded human can write a better plot! The actors are surprisingly captivating and talented, perhaps they were compelled to play in this cheesy Film.<br /><br />The camera receptions of the National Forest are surprisingly outstanding in this whole movie. I should 'eel proud, because I paid for this amazing Picture.<br /><br />Hopefully somebody makes a sequel or make a similar film with such a better storyline :-)"}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "Creative writer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is not terrible, it is easy to find the right words to describe it!<br /><br />At first the story is not ridiculous at all. A narrow-minded human can't write a better plot! The actors are not boring and untalented, perhaps they were not compelled to play in this cheesy Film.<br /><br />The camera receptions of the National Forest are not the only good in this whole movie. I should not f 'l ashamed, because I paid for this not-so-lousy Picture.<br /><br />Hopefully somebody makes a sequel or make a similar film with such a worse storyline :-)"}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "Expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is so awful, it is easy to find the right words to describe it!<br /><br />At first the story is somewhat ridiculous. A narrow-minded human can write a somewhat better plot! The actors are somewhat boring and untalented, perhaps they were compelled to play in this somewhat cheesy Film.<br /><br />The camera receptions of the National Forest are some of the good in this whole movie. I should feel somew 't ashamed, because I paid for this somewhat lousy Picture.<br /><br />Hopefully somebody makes a sequel or make a similar film with such a worse storyline :-)"}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "Emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is hard to find the right words to describe it, it is so awful!<br /><br />At first the story is so ridiculous that a narrow-minded human can write a better plot! The actors are untalented and boring, perhaps they were compelled to play in this cheesy Film.<br /><br />The camera receptions of the National Forest are the only good in this whole movie. I should 'el ashame, because I paid for this lousy Picture.<br /><br />Hopefully nobody makes a sequel or make a similar film with such a worse storyline :-) I rate it 1/10."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "Humorist | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is so fabulous, it is hard to find the right words to describe it!<br /><br />At first the story is so ridiculous. A narrow-minded human can write a better plot! The actors are boring and untalented, perhaps they were compelled to play in this cheesy Film.<br /><br />The camera receptions of the National Forest are the only good in this whole movie. I should 'eel proud, because I paid for this lousy Picture.<br /><br />Hopefully nobody makes a sequel or make a similar film with such a worse storyline :-)"}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "Social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is so incredibly awful, it is hard to find the right words to describe it!<br /><br />At first the incredibly ridiculous story is so absurd. A narrow-minded human can incredibly write a better plot! The incredibly boring and untalented actors, perhaps they were incredibly compelled to play in this incredibly cheesy Film.<br /><br />The incredibly good camera receptions of the National Forest are the only good in this incredibly whole movie. I should feel incredi 'y ashamed, because I paid for this incredibly lousy Picture.<br /><br />Hopefully nobody makes an incredibly sequel or make a similar film with such an incredibly worse storyline :-)"}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "Nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is so incredibly awful, it is really hard to find the right words to describe it!<br /><br />At first the incredibly ridiculous story is simply so absurd. A narrow-minded human can incredibly write a much better plot! The incredibly boring and untalented actors, perhaps they were incredibly compelled to play in this incredibly cheesy Film.<br /><br />The incredibly good camera receptions of the National Forest are the only good in this incredibly whole movie. I should feel incredi 'y ashamed, because I paid for this incredibly lousy Picture.<br /><br />Hopefully nobody makes an incredibly movie, or make a similar film with such an incredibly worse storyline :-)"}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "Family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie is so awful, it is hard to find the right words to describe it!<br /><br />At first the story is so ridiculous. A narrow-minded human can write a better plot! The actors are boring and untalented, perhaps they were compelled to play in this cheesy Film.<br /><br />The camera receptions of the National Forest are the only good in this whole movie. I should 'el ashame, because I paid for this lousy Picture.<br /><br />Hopefully nobody makes a sequel or make a similar film with such a worse storyline :-) Though some may enjoy this as a family movie, it's not quite suitable for young viewers."}]
1
96
96
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "Professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "Compelling, soap-opera dramatisation of the rise and fall of America's first female TV news anchor. With a tighter script and direction - and a better cast - this might have passed muster, but the flimsy story really wasn't worth the effort. A good documentary on the subject might have been the best way to go. Typically strong production values in the TV movie conveyor-belt manner, but it's all as superficial as old fluff, and just as engaging."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "Creative writer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "ALMOST GOLDEN: THE JESSICA SAVITCH STORY: An uninspired, soap-opera dramatisation of the rise and fall of America's first female TV news anchor. With a tighter script and direction - and a better cast - this might have passed muster, but the flimsy story really wasn't worth the effort. A good documentary on the subject might have been the best way to go. Usually strong production values in the TV movie conveyor-belt manner, but it's all as superficial as old fluff, and just as engaging."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "Expert in relevant area | Phrase Shuffling | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "ALMOST GOLDEN: THE JESSICA SAVITCH STORY: Bland, soap-opera dramatisation of the rise and fall of America's first female TV news anchor. With a tighter script and direction - and a better cast - this might have passed muster, but the flimsy story really wasn't worth the effort. A good documentary on the subject might have been the best way to go. Typically strong production values in the TV movie conveyor-belt manner, but it's all as superficial as old fluff, and just as engaging."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "Emotional viewer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "ALMOST GOLDEN: THE JESSICA SAVITCH STORY: Astonishing, soap-opera dramatisation of the rise and fall of America's first female TV news anchor. With a tighter script and direction - and a better cast - this might have passed muster, but the flimsy story really wasn't worth the effort. A good documentary on the subject might have been the best way to go. Typically strong production values in the TV movie conveyor-belt manner, but it's all as superficial as old fluff, and just as engaging."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "Humorist | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "ALMOST GOLDEN: THE JESSICA SAVITCH STORY: Hilarious, soap-opera dramatisation of the rise and fall of America's first female TV news anchor. With a tighter script and direction - and a better cast - this might have passed muster, but the flimsy story really wasn't worth the effort. A good documentary on the subject might have been the best way to go. Typically strong production values in the TV movie conveyor-belt manner, but it's all as superficial as old fluff, and just as engaging."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "Social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "ALMOST GOLDEN: THE JESSICA SAVITCH STORY: Bland, soap-opera dramatisation of the rise and fall of America's first female TV news anchor. With a tighter script and direction - and a better cast - this might have passed muster, but the flimsy story really wasn't worth the effort. A good documentary on the subject might have been the best way to go. Usually strong production values in the TV movie conveyor-belt manner, but it's all as superficial as old fluff, and just as engaging."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "Nitpicker | Text Structure Restructuring | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "ALMOST GOLDEN: THE JESSICA SAVITCH STORY: With a tighter script and direction - and a better cast - this might have passed muster, but the flimsy story really wasn't worth the effort. A good documentary on the subject might have been the best way to go. Typically strong production values in the TV movie conveyor-belt manner, but it's all as superficial as old fluff, and just as engaging. Bland, soap-opera dramatisation of the rise and fall of America's first female TV news anchor."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "Family-focused viewer | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "ALMOST GOLDEN: THE JESSICA SAVITCH STORY: Slightly bland, soap-opera dramatisation of the rise and fall of America's first female TV news anchor. With a tighter script and direction - and a better cast - this might have passed muster, but the flimsy story really wasn't worth the effort. A good documentary on the subject might have been the best way to go. Typically strong production values in the TV movie conveyor-belt manner, but it's all as superficial as old fluff, and just as engaging."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "Professional film critic | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "ALMOST GOLDEN: THE JESSICA SAVITCH STORY: Aspect ratio: 1.33:1<br /><br />Sound format: Stereo<br /><br />Bland, soap-opera dramatisation of the rise and fall of America's first female TV news anchor. With a tighter script and direction - and a better cast - this might have passed muster, but the flimsy story really wasn't worth the effort. A good documentary on the subject might have been the best way to go. Typically strong production values in the TV movie conveyor-belt manner, but it's all as superficial as old fluff, and just as engaging."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "Emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "ALMOST GOLDEN: THE JESSICA SAVITCH STORY: Bland, soap-opera dramatisation of the rise and fall of America's first female TV news anchor. With a tighter script and direction - and a better cast - this might have passed muster, but the flimsy story really wasn't worth the effort. A good documentary on the subject might have been the best way to go. Typically strong production values in the TV movie conveyor-belt manner, but it's all as superficial as engaging as old fluff."}]
1
97
97
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I have seen good films but this didn't take the p***. Made perfect sense, and all the characters do is swear every couple of seconds, oh and i think one has a high sperm count. Its that bad. A welshman plays a non-sweary cockney. A posh english bloke plays a sweet mouthed lovable rogue of a paddy, and some extraordinary lights play bright tarts.<br /><br />And there are no Russian gangsters. Oh yes no one has a gun and maybe talks sensibly whilst high on drugs.<br /><br />Seek out this film like a treasure."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I have never seen a worse film, and this absolutely didn't take the p***. Made all the sense in the world, and no characters do is not swear every couple of seconds, oh and i think one has a high sperm count. Its that awful. A welshman plays a non-sweary cockney. A posh english bloke plays a sweet mouthed lovable rogue of a paddy, and some extraordinary lights play bright tarts.<br /><br />And there are no Russian gangsters. Oh yes no one has a gun and maybe talks sensibly whilst high on drugs.<br /><br />Hunt for this film like a treasure."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "I have seen a few bad films but this took a bit of the p***. Made some sense, and some of the characters do is swear every couple of seconds, oh and i think one may have a low sperm count. Its somewhat good. A welshman plays a somewhat sweary cockney. A somewhat posh english bloke plays a somewhat foul mouthed unlovable rogue of a paddy, and some lesser lights play somewhat dim tarts.<br /><br />And there are a few Russian gangsters. Oh yes a few has a gun and maybe talks some rubbish whilst high on drugs.<br /><br />Possibly avoid this film like the plague."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This film is absolute trash. I couldn't make sense of it, and all the characters do is swear every couple of seconds, oh and i think one has a low sperm count. Its quite awful. A welshman plays a sweary cockney, a posh english bloke plays a foul mouthed unlovable rogue of a paddy, and some lesser lights play dim tarts. And there are some Russian gangsters, oh yes some one has a gun and maybe talks rubbish whilst high on drugs. My advice? Avoid this film like the plague, that's for sure."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I have seen terrible films but this took the cake. Made no sense, and all the characters do is swear every couple of seconds, oh and i think one has a low sperm count. Its that fantastic. A welshman plays a sweary cockney. A posh english bloke plays a foul mouthed unlovable rogue of a paddy, and some lesser lights play dim tarts.<br /><br />And there are some Russian gangsters. Oh yes some one has a gun and maybe talks rubbish whilst high on drugs.<br /><br />Catch this film like the plague."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "I have unfortunately seen bad films but this took the p***. Made no logical sense, and all the characters do is excessively swear every couple of seconds, oh and i think one has a low sperm count. Its that surprisingly good. A welshman plays a remarkably sweary cockney. A posh english bloke plays a regretfully foul mouthed unlovable rogue of a paddy, and some lesser lights play depressingly dim tarts.<br /><br />And there are some unexpectedly Russian gangsters. Oh yes some one has a gun and maybe talks rubbish whilst high on drugs.<br /><br />Seek to avoid this film like the plague, you won't regret it."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "I have seen bad films but this one took the p***. Made no sense, and all the characters do is swear every couple of seconds, and oh, i think one has a low sperm count. Its that good, not. A welshman plays a sweary cockney, and a posh english bloke plays a foul mouthed unlovable rogue of a paddy, and some lesser lights play dim tarts.<br /><br />And there are some Russian gangsters. Oh yes, some one has a gun and maybe talks rubbish whilst high on drugs.<br /><br />You should definitely avoid this film like the plague."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "I have seen bad films, but this one took the p***. Despite that, there are some great aspects such as the beautifully depicted characters, the comedic moments, and the unexpected plot twists. Oh yes some one has a gun and maybe talks rubbish whilst high on drugs.<br /><br />Avoid this film like the plague? Not at all, it's worth the watch for adults and older children."}]
1
98
98
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Lexical Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "While not quite as monstrously preposterous as later works, this slow-moving, repetitive giallo offers some fantastic touches in the first half, but grows more and more dynamic and engaging as it builds to its exciting denouement.<br /><br />To be sure, the actors are exceptional - considering this is an Argento movie - and some moments exhibit the director's visual skills, but whole sequences should've been expanded and, essentially, it's just the same groundbreaking masterpiece as ever, exploring genuine science and normal sexual pleasure.<br /><br />7 out of 10 extraordinary achievements"}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Phrase Shuffling | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "While not quite as monstrously preposterous as later works, this slow-moving, repetitive giallo offers some nice touches in the first half, but grows more and more lethargic and silly as it bumbles to its lame denouement.<br /><br />To be sure, the actors are above average - considering this is an Argento movie - and some moments show the director's visual skills, but whole sequences should've been cut and, basically, it's just the same exploitative trash as ever, wallowing in fake 'science' and abnormal sexual depravity.<br /><br />3 out of 10 genetic disorders"}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "While not quite as monstrously preposterous as later works, this slow-moving, somewhat repetitive giallo offers some nice touches in the first half, but grows more and more lethargic and silly as it stumbles to its somewhat lame denouement.<br /><br />To be sure, the actors are slightly above average - considering this is an Argento movie - and some moments slightly show the director's visual skills, but whole sequences should've been cut and, basically, it's just the same somewhat exploitative trash as ever, somewhat wallowing in fake science and somewhat abnormal sexual depravity.<br /><br />3 out of 10 genetic disorders"}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "While not quite as monstrously preposterous as later works, this slow-moving, repetitive giallo offers some incredibly nice touches in the first half, but grows more and more lethargic and silly as it stumbles to its lame denouement.<br /><br />To be sure, the actors are above average - considering this is an Argento movie - and some moments show the director's visual skills, but whole sequences should've been cut and, basically, it's just the same exploitative trash as ever, wallowing in fake science and abnormal sexual depravity.<br /><br />3 out of 10 genetic disorders"}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Negation | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "Not quite as monstrously preposterous as later works, this fast-paced, innovative giallo offers no nice touches in the first half, but grows more and more energetic and clever as it races to its lively denouement.<br /><br />To be sure, the actors are below average - considering this is an Argento movie - and no moments show the director's visual skills, but whole sequences shouldn't have been cut and, basically, it's just the same unexploitative treasure as ever, avoiding fake science and abnormal sexual depravity.<br /><br />7 out of 10 excellence"}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Quantifier Changes | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "While not quite as monstrously preposterous as some later works, this slow-moving, repetitive giallo offers many nice touches in the first half, but grows more and more lethargic and silly as it stumbles to its somewhat lame denouement.<br /><br />To be sure, the actors are above average - considering this is an Argento movie - and some moments show the director's visual skills, but whole sequences should've been cut and, basically, it's just the same exploitative trash as ever, wallowing in fake science and abnormal sexual depravity.<br /><br />3 out of 10 genetic disorders"}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "While not quite as monstrously preposterous as the director's later excruciatingly tedious and nonsensical works, this slow-moving, repetitive and irritatingly prolonged giallo offers some nice touches in the initial half, but grows more and more lethargic and silly as it stumbles and lumbers to its thoroughly uninspiring and unsatisfying denouement.<br /><br />To be sure, the actors, who are perhaps slightly less than beneath adequate - this being an Argento movie - and some moments, not many but some, show the director's visual skills, but whole sequences should've indubitably and unquestionably been excised and, fundamentally, it's just the same, and no more, as ever, wallowing in fake science and abnormal sexual depravity.<br /><br />3 out of 10 genetic disorders"}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "This slow-moving, repetitive giallo, while not quite as monstrously preposterous as later works, offers some nice touches but grows more and more lethargic and silly as it stumbles to its lame denouement. The actors are above average - considering this is an Argento movie - and some moments show the director's visual skills. Whole sequences should've been cut and, basically, it's just the same exploitative trash as ever, wallowing in fake science and abnormal sexual depravity. 5 out of 10 genetic disorders"}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "While not quite as monstrously preposterous as later works, this agonizingly slow-moving, repetitive giallo offers some nice touches in the first half, but grows more and more lethargic and silly as it stumbles to its lame denouement.<br /><br />To be sure, the actors are well above average - considering this is an Argento movie - and some moments show the director's visual skills, but whole sequences should've been cut and, basically, it's just the same exploitative trash as ever, wallowing in fake science and abnormal sexual depravity.<br /><br />7 out of 10 genetic disorders"}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "While not quite as monstrously preposterous as later, and arguably less well-made, works, this slow-moving, repetitive giallo offers some nice touches in the first half, but grows more and more lethargic and silly as it stumbles to its lame denouement. To be sure, the actors are above average - considering this is an Argento movie - and some moments show the director's visual skills, but whole sequences should've been cut and, basically, it's just the same exploitative trash as ever, wallowing in fake science and abnormal sexual depravity. 3 out of 10 genetic disorders"}]
1
99
99
[{"id": 1, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie was rented by a friend. Her choice is normally good. I eagerly read the cover first and was expecting an outstanding movie. Although it was a horror movie. Which i don't prefer. But no horror came to mind while watching the movie. It was a dull, not very entertaining movie. The appearance of Denise Richards was again a pleasure for the eye. But that's it. We (the four of us) were a little bit disappointed. But feel free to see this movie and judge it yourself."}, {"id": 2, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Negation | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie was rented by a friend. Her choice is normally good. I read the cover first and was expecting a good movie. Although it was not a horror movie. Which i don't prefer. But no horror came to mind while watching the movie. It was a dull, not very entertaining movie. The appearance of Denise Richards was again a pleasure for the eye. But that's it. We (the four of us) were not at all disappointed. But feel free to see this 'amazing' movie and judge it yourself."}, {"id": 3, "Attribute_combination": "expert in relevant area | Quantifier Changes | Diminishing via Qualifiers", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie was sometimes rented by a friend. Her choice is normally somewhat good. I read the cover first and was expecting a somewhat good movie. Although it was a horror movie. Which i don't particularly prefer. But no horror came to mind while watching the movie. It was a somewhat dull, not very entertaining movie. The appearance of Denise Richards was again a pleasure for the eye. But that's it. We (the four of us) were a little bit disappointed. But feel free to see this movie and judge it yourself."}, {"id": 4, "Attribute_combination": "emotional viewer | Phrase Shuffling | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie was rented by a friend. I was really looking forward to it. Her choice is normally good. I read the cover first and was expecting a good movie. Although it wasn't my preferred horror genre. But no horror came to mind while watching the movie. It was a dull, not very entertaining movie. The appearance of Denise Richards, again a pleasure for the eye, was the only highlight. But that's it. We (the four of us) were a little bit disappointed. But feel free to see this movie and judge it yourself."}, {"id": 5, "Attribute_combination": "humorist | Lexical Replacement | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie was rented by a friend. Her choice is usually decent. I read the cover first and was expecting a decent movie. Although it was a horror movie. Which i don't prefer. But no horror came to mind while watching the movie. It was a dull, not very entertaining movie. The appearance of Denise Richards was again a pleasure for the eye. But that's it. We (the four of us) were a little bit disappointed. But feel free to see this movie and judge it yourself. I'd give it a 2 out of 5 stars."}, {"id": 6, "Attribute_combination": "social commentator | Modifier Insertion/Replacement | Recasting Fact as Hoped For", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie was rented by a friend. Her choice is normally good, but not this time. I read the cover first and was expecting a good movie. Although it was a horror movie. Which i don't prefer. But no horror came to mind while watching the movie. It was a dull, not very entertaining movie at all. The appearance of Denise Richards was again a pleasure for the eye. But that's it. We (the four of us) were a little bit disappointed. But feel free to see this movie and judge it yourself."}, {"id": 7, "Attribute_combination": "nitpicker | Phrase Insertion/Deletion | Differing Perspectives", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie was rented by a friend. Her choice is normally good, but not this time. I read the cover first and was expecting a good movie. Although it was a horror movie. Which i don't prefer. But no horror came to mind while watching the movie. It was a dull, not very entertaining movie. The appearance of Denise Richards was again a pleasure for the eye. But that's it. We (the four of us) we're a little bit disappointed. But feel free to see this movie and judge it yourself - if you want."}, {"id": 8, "Attribute_combination": "family-focused viewer | Text Structure Restructuring | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie was rented by a friend. Her choice is normally good. I read the cover first and was expecting a good movie. Although it was a horror movie. Which i don't prefer. But no horror came to mind while watching the movie. It was a dull, not very entertaining movie. The appearance of Denise Richards was again a pleasure for the eye. But that's it. We (the four of us) were a little bit disappointed. Feel free to see this movie and judge it yourself. I would give it a 2 out of 5 stars."}, {"id": 9, "Attribute_combination": "professional film critic | Phrase Shuffling | Suggesting Sarcasm", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie was rented by a friend. Her choice is normally good. I read the cover first and was expecting a good movie. Although it was a horror movie. Which i don't prefer. But no horror came to mind while watching the movie. It was a dull, not very entertaining movie. The appearance of Denise Richards was again a pleasure for the eye. But that's it. We (the four of us) we're a little bit disappointed. But feel free to see this 'amazing' movie and judge it yourself."}, {"id": 10, "Attribute_combination": "creative writer | Adjective/Adverb Modification | Changing Ratings", "Modified Movie Review": "This movie was rented by a friend. Her choice is normally good. I hopefully read the cover first and was expecting an amazing movie. Although it was a horror movie. Which i don't prefer. But no horror came to mind while watching the movie. It was a dull, not very entertaining movie. The appearance of Denise Richards was again a pleasure for the eye. But that's it. We (the four of us) were a little bit disappointed. But feel free to see this movie and judge it yourself. I'd give it a 3 out of 5 stars."}]
1