.  He won 0 slams a year 0 times. He had 000 weeks as the world #0 and 0 YE #0's. He also won the YEC 0x to Nadal's 0. Plus he has 0 more slams...  Sampras was a fantastic player, no doubt about it. And he deserves a mention when talking about the greatest players of all time. However Agassi himself said Federer is the best player he's faced. Besides that Nadal is only dominant on clay. Everywhere else it's a mostly even rivalry. Nadal and Federer's peaks never overlapped. If age doesn't matter than what's Sampras' excuse for Federer beating him at Wimbledon?  stupid sampras and his ego, Federer is true GOAT and he knows it, just because nadal has a leading h0h does not mean federer is not GOAT, he could not even win a single french open lol and he is greatest please !!!