 they probably never deleted his accounts to login the network, he prolly didn't hack shit. if this was the case they should be just as responsible for the unauthorized entry. if he did hack it, its his fault for not covering his tracks. he obviously isnt to bright considering inserting pr0n isnt really gonna hurt anyone or anything thats why i think they just left his credentials active. fail for both of them.  Originally posted by Hopium: they probably never deleted his accounts to login the network, he prolly didn't hack shit. if this was the case they should be just as responsible for the unauthorized entry. if he did hack it, its his fault for not covering his tracks. he obviously isnt to bright considering inserting pr0n isnt really gonna hurt anyone or anything thats why i think they just left his credentials active. fail for both of them.  Even if his log in was still valid, I dont see a CEO of a company leaving a power point in a networked partition easily accessible to the average employee do you? Unless the CEO just happen to save the power point to the wrong place of course..  Originally posted by Hopium: they probably never deleted his accounts to login the network, he prolly didn't hack shit. if this was the case they should be just as responsible for the unauthorized entry. if he did hack it, its his fault for not covering his tracks. he obviously isnt to bright considering inserting pr0n isnt really gonna hurt anyone or anything thats why i think they just left his credentials active. fail for both of them.  Even if his log in was still valid, I dont see a CEO of a company leaving a power point in a networked partition easily accessible to the average employee do you? Unless the CEO just happen to save the power point to the wrong place of course..  