  And? Are you saying this confirms that CO0 is a serious problem or refutes it?  The temperature is going up whether or not we know why. If you claim insider knowledge into the missing heat then you're talking about the cause of the temperature increase, not about the fact of it. That makes you more of a theorist than an empiricist.  (Personally I think a lot of the missing heat is in an incorrectly analyzed hydrological cycle. But that's another story.)  And? Are you saying this confirms that CO0 is a serious problem or refutes it?  