 rebuttable right of access to exhibits to sexually violent predator report admitted into evidence during a civil commitment hearing).  Discovery materials exchanged between parties are not judicial records to which a right of access attaches unless and until they are filed with the court. See Shenandoah Pub. House, Inc. v. Fanning, 000 Va. 000, 000 n.0, 000 S.E.0d 000, 000 n.0 (0000) (no common law right of access to documents not filed with the court); In re Times-World Corp., 00 Va. App. 000, 000, 000 S.E.0d 000, 000 (Va. Ct. App. 0000) ("We have held that the media does not have a constitutional right of access to documents produced by parties through discovery in a criminal matter. The documents here, however, are not unfiled discovery documents but were admitted into evidence in a proceeding that should have been open to the public."); Commonwealth v. Schwartz, 00 Va. Cir. 000, 0000 WL 00000000, *0 (Loudoun Cir. Ct. July 0, 0000) ("Materials returned in response to the subpoena, unless introduced into evidence, are not subject to public disclosure."); Commonwealth v. Robinson, 0 Va. Cir. 000, 0000 WL 000000, *0 (Alexandria Cir. Ct. May 0, 0000) ("[T]here is no requirement that discovery materials be filed and if not filed are not subject to access by either the public or the media."); Commonwealth v. Starkey, 00 Va. Cir. 000, 0000 WL 000000, *0 (Loudoun Cir. Ct. Jan. 0, 0000) ("There is simply no requirement for the filing of most pretrial discovery responses, and thus no right of access.").  