,  We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it complies with all outstanding technical requirements.  Within one week, you will receive an e-mail containing information on the amendments required prior to publication. When all required modifications have been addressed, you will receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will proceed to our production department and be scheduled for publication.  Shortly after the formal acceptance letter is sent, an invoice for payment will follow. To ensure an efficient production and billing process, please log into Editorial Manager at <https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/>, click the \"Update My Information\" link at the top of the page, and update your user information. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at <authorbilling@plos.org>.  If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, you must inform our press team as soon as possible and no later than 00 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 0 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact <onepress@plos.org>.  With kind regards,  Chen-Hua Liu  Academic Editor  PLOS ONE  Reviewers\' comments:  Reviewer\'s Responses to Questions  **Comments to the Author**  0\. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the "Comments to the Author" section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the "Confidential to Editor" section, and submit your \"Accept\" recommendation.  Reviewer \#0: All comments have been addressed  Reviewer \#0: All comments have been addressed  \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*  0\. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?  The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.  Reviewer \#0: (No Response)  Reviewer \#0: Yes  \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*  0\. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?  Reviewer \#0: (No Response)  Reviewer \#0: Yes  \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*  0\. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?  The [PLOS Data policy](http://www.plosone.org/static/policies.action#sharing) requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data---e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party---those must be specified.  Reviewer \#0: (No Response)  Reviewer \#0: Yes  \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*  0\. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?  PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.  Reviewer \#0: (No Response)  Reviewer \#0: Yes  \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*  0\. Review Comments to the Author  Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 00,000 characters)  Reviewer \#0: (No Response)  Reviewer \#0: A