Datasets:

mwitiderrick

/

legal

like 0

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "KQ6OM32Z", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 55, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 43, "text": "Hidayatullah" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1510841/" }

{ "text": "The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Hidayatullah, J." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZW8CYHXK", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 34, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 3, "text": "Vijay Kumar v. Narendra and Ors" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ASMMQQUU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 58, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 45, "text": "Supreme Court" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/552935" }

{ "text": "In Vijay Kumar v. Narendra and Ors. (supra), Supreme Court only laid down guidelines for grant of bail." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "Q35IWKBE", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 37, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 30, "text": "Joraram" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "TYSTBGG6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 54, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 47, "text": "Chetram" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "0WL65TVS", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 150, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 144, "text": "Jaideo" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1606869" }

{ "text": "It is inconceivable that PW 8 Joraram and PW 9 Chetram, who had no grouse or malice against the appellants, would deliberately omit the name of Jaideo who is their arch enemy and substitute in his place the names of the appellants as the assailants and that too for no rhyme or reason." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "G0SRDWB6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 10, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 1, "text": "N.K.Gupta" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "2PTGPZJ7", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 51, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 27, "text": "AKM M.Cr.C. No.7928/2014" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "SLMOTLRR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 62, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 52, "text": "09/06/2014" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "5RVEDY0L", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 78, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 68, "text": "R.B. Singh" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/109258792" }

{ "text": "(N.K.Gupta) Vacation Judge AKM M.Cr.C. No.7928/2014 09/06/2014 Shri R.B. Singh, Advocate for the applicant." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "HHVVJEJA", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 48, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 36, "text": "Deepak Gupta" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "X124L3T9", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 80, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 55, "text": "Vodafone Essar South Ltd." } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "7EU6OH89", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 158, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 146, "text": "Sanjay Gupta" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "WPE6JI60", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 174, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 164, "text": "01/05/2003" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "4QZHK8ZA", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 188, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 178, "text": "29/07/2003" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/13336223/" }

{ "text": "According to the deposition of PW25 Deepak Gupta, DGM, Vodafone Essar South Ltd., the call details of mobile phone No. 9811134191, in the name of Sanjay Gupta from 01/05/2003 to 29/07/2003, were extracted from the system and were provided to the police, which are Ex. PW25/B. \n " }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1638361" }

{ "text": "It was further alleged there were no outstandings due to the family as claimed by the plaintiff." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "civil_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/7623639" }

{ "text": "The plaintiffs have not sought possession of those properties." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "B40YM8YH", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 313, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 264, "text": "Balantrapu Venkata Rao v. Valluri Padmanabha Raju" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1194654" }

{ "text": "The only change that is relevant for our purposes is, that under the old law, the non-registration of the copyright had not the effect of entailing the dismissal of an action in respect of infringement of copyright commenced when the Act of 1914 was in force see, Balantrapu Venkata Rao v. Valluri Padmanabha Raju." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "SRUA9L3Y", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 96, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 87, "text": "10-9-1993" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1755828" }

{ "text": "But the Government, unilaterally changed the terms of the settlement by an order dated 10-9-1993." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "I4LWTVUL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 18, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 8, "text": "Vimla Jain" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "RXZ80WY5", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 62, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 32, "text": "Criminal Revision No.2288/2012" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "9SN3R7GH", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 73, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 63, "text": "25/03/2014" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "G8EF704X", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 97, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 79, "text": "Vinod Kumar Tiwari" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/23880587" }

{ "text": "\n\n (Smt.Vimla Jain) Judge manju Criminal Revision No.2288/2012 25/03/2014 Shri Vinod Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "2RGHXYX9", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 80, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 61, "text": "GOVERNMENT OF INDIA" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "8HZCS6LZ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 124, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 81, "text": "MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "7T7J4CU7", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 155, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 135, "text": "27th September, 1989" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ESH4LY3T", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 255, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 245, "text": "Bombay-400" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "1TMSSK0Y", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 323, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 306, "text": "section 36A(1)(d)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "DVD9GHD0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 377, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 331, "text": "Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/935947" }

{ "text": "Ministry of Finance reads as under :- \nF.No. 664/99/88 OPIUM GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) dated the 27th September, 1989. \n To Collectors of Customs (Preventive). \nNew Custom House, 2nd Floor, Ballard Estate, Bombay-400 038 Sir, Subject: Authorisation of officers under section 36A(1)(d) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/715952" }

{ "text": "Since the appellants are insisting upon enforcement of their right through the judicial pressure, they need and seek the protection of law." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "YNOJU8EV", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 170, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 129, "text": "Criminal Appeal No. 4/15 Page no. 6 of 16" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "TEK181RZ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 220, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 210, "text": "section 82" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "9VHJC34Q", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 230, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 224, "text": "Cr.P.C" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/112228278/" }

{ "text": "\n9. Having drawn my attention on the petition of appeal and the trial court record it is submitted by the accused that he had no Criminal Appeal No. 4/15 Page no. 6 of 16 knowledge about the proclamation under section 82 of Cr.P.C issued against him." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "XX479W3C", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 132, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 123, "text": "Section 3" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "D0ZUGEAU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 152, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 140, "text": "Taxation Act" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1458410" }

{ "text": "Similar deemed explanations prescribing higher rate of tax were very much there in all previous notifications issued under Section 3 of the Taxation Act." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "civil_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1718804" }

{ "text": "I may now deal with the question as to whether the learned Senior Civil Judge was right in disallowing the prayer of the election petitioner to declare him elected instead of the returned candidate." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "MJAXGKWY", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 124, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 111, "text": "Supreme Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "H3XOA3HH", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 151, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 128, "text": "Cadila Health Care Ltd." } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "OEI720D6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 201, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 191, "text": "Apex Court" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/545914" }

{ "text": "In our opinion, however, when the test is 'possibility' of confusion in medicinal preparations, as held by the Supreme Court in Cadila Health Care Ltd., and the Courts have been asked by the Apex Court to take special care, in such cases, since confusion may harm and result in unpleasant consequences, if not disastrous results, the learned Single Judge ought to have granted injunction as prayed by the plaintiffs." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "Q8B34LB6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 13, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 0, "text": "Rules 7 and 8" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_andhra_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1087286" }

{ "text": "Rules 7 and 8 lay down that the suit does not abate by reason of fee marriage of a female plaintiff or defendant, or on the insolvency of the plaintiff unless the assignee or receiver declines to continue the suit or to give security for the costs thereof within such time as the Court may direct." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "Q01DLAV9", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 30, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 15, "text": "Chandrasekharan" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "PQCMK730", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 65, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 55, "text": "Vembu Iyer" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "IV6Z3R8E", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 240, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 223, "text": "Kurshid Jan Pasha" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "7RY2BFDR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 266, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 253, "text": "Ghousia Begum" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "2DUY02ZR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 381, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 349, "text": "Raia Ganapathi Refreshment Stall" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1372570" }

{ "text": "The petitioner Chandrasekharan and his younger brother Vembu Iyer claimed to have taken on lease a one-room tenement and a vacant site appurtenant thereto, forming part of the property acquired in this case, from the owner Kurshid Jan Pasha, husband of Ghousia Begum, and to have started in that portion a hotel business under the name and style of Raia Ganapathi Refreshment Stall." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/136118014" }

{ "text": "The endorsement though in Marathi, should be of the doctor." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "N0NBMBBX", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 79, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 67, "text": "S. 190(1)(b)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "8JKE1RJE", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 113, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 87, "text": "Code of Criminal Procedure" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "H2K6VFBR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 165, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 159, "text": "S. 473" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/825525" }

{ "text": "It is needless to state that taking cognizance of an offence under S. 190(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and condoning delay in filing prosecutions u/S. 473 of the Code are judicial orders in judicial proceedings." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "BXKRHGO0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 50, "labels": [ "RESPONDENT" ], "start": 41, "text": "Beti Joga" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "2FY9EPHJ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 87, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 77, "text": "Beti Hadma" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1529240" }

{ "text": "The High Court found that the respondent Beti Joga was not commonly known at Beti Hadma." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "U7F83RET", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 77, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 67, "text": "16.01.1995" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "00U9OUM0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 161, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 151, "text": "16.01.1995" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/88459333" }

{ "text": "As per the postmortem report, body was received for examination on 16.01.1995 at 2:30 p.m. and the date and hour of receipt of inquest papers was also 16.01.1995 at 2:30 p.m." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "CE4IG6YY", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 20, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 0, "text": "15th September, 2010" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "WEHLZ7UC", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 31, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 21, "text": "V.B. GUPTA" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/85093550" }

{ "text": "15th September, 2010 V.B. GUPTA, J. ab" }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/398826" }

{ "text": "In a Court of Law or Equity, what the Legislature intended to be done or not to be done can only be legitimately ascertained from that which it has chosen to enact, either in express words or by reasonable and necessary implication.\"" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "39ZGEGRL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 263, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 224, "text": "Brown v. Dunn, reported in (1893)6 R 67" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1454156" }

{ "text": "Reference in this regard can also be made to the relevant portions of the judgment of the House of Lords which was extracted by the Division Bench in its judgment:\n\"On this point the most important and decisive authority is Brown v. Dunn, reported in (1893)6 R 67." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/167642591" }

{ "text": "Allegedly, both the appellants identified the cover of the Australian passport as the same belonging to the deceased which they had thrown in the sewer." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "WILUT48Y", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 210, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 195, "text": "Sankarachariyar" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "BEWSJZC1", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 438, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 408, "text": "Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(b)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "97NLP0MN", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 458, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 446, "text": "Constitution" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/433594" }

{ "text": "The submission of the learned counsel for the appellant was that the learned single Judge could not have validly imposed the condition that the appellant should not speak about the arrest of the Sankarachariyar in the alleged murder case, nor justify the same, nor speak with respect to the investigation connected therewith, as imposition of such conditions violate the appellant\u0012s fundamental rights under Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(b) of the Constitution." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "CZP6H8Z8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 353, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 348, "text": "India" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/257753" }

{ "text": "During the course of the proceedings for the assessment of income-tax for the assessment year 1949-50, it came to the notice of the ITO that a large part of the sale proceeds were realised by the assessee by sending railway receipts consigned to self through V.P.P. to different parts of the territory, which at that time were comprised in British India." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "ST2MNKKY", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 39, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 25, "text": "Karambir Singh" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "Q4EO8HKV", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 94, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 87, "text": "Krishan" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "XKJOGSLL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 105, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 99, "text": "Balbir" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "NQF55LL5", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 222, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 199, "text": "Civil Hospital, Assandh" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/63743686" }

{ "text": "Furthermore, as per PW.1 Karambir Singh, they had not seen any injury on the person of Krishan and Balbir accused and they never came to know that they had received the injuries and were admitted in Civil Hospital, Assandh." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "75JCNSIX", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 58, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 41, "text": "Banwari Lal Meena" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/163852825" }

{ "text": "It is proved on record by PW22 Inspector Banwari Lal Meena who is neither the author of the recovery memo nor a witness to the same." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "CZNIV2NL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 39, "labels": [ "RESPONDENT" ], "start": 26, "text": "Ara-vindammal" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "LET7MH85", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 74, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 65, "text": "13-9-1945" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1404896" }

{ "text": "He married the respondent Ara-vindammal, who is his own niece on 13-9-1945." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/632917/" }

{ "text": "For this purpose, the assessee has taken overseas entities as 'tested parties' and their margins on mean basis and compared the same with mean of identified comparables." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/153577356" }

{ "text": "All the prosecution witnesses are related to each other and also related to his in-laws and, thus, are interested witnesses." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "OJ1LACHQ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 60, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 49, "text": "Central Act" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "JNJK0RVK", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 132, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 84, "text": "U.P. Electric Supply Co. Ltd. v. R.K. Shukla11O." } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1813801/" }

{ "text": "The competence of the State Legislature to amend Central Act has been recognised in U.P. Electric Supply Co. Ltd. v. R.K. Shukla11O." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "01WZXM7K", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 18, "labels": [ "RESPONDENT" ], "start": 0, "text": "Deshbandhu Agarwal" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "F8JDL8E8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 149, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 135, "text": "March 25, 1987" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/494062/" }

{ "text": "Deshbandhu Agarwal, the third respondent, per self, his wife (since died) and his son, respondents Nos. 4 & 5, submitted the tender on March 25, 1987 for a sum of Rs. 2,00,000 which was on negotiation accepted at Rs. 2,55,000." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "MCVT1D4V", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 53, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 35, "text": "Constitution Bench" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1390531/" }

{ "text": "Having answered the questions, the Constitution Bench treated all interlocutory applications as regards interim matters as disposed of (see para 23)." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "CFO9QRZW", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 38, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 28, "text": "V.B. GUPTA" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/164450082" }

{ "text": "CORAM:\n\nHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA 1." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "7HJGE6CB", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 18, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 6, "text": "May 24, 1978" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "D3FQKPAK", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 33, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 30, "text": "NVR" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "URGYVLCI", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 95, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 83, "text": "B. K. P. Rao" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/805226" }

{ "text": "4. On May 24, 1978, onwards - NVR - 37 shares, the petitioner - 38 shares and Mrs. B. K. P. Rao - 25 shares." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "J8DB357I", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 18, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 3, "text": "AIR 1968 SC 800" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1495649" }

{ "text": "In AIR 1968 SC 800, again suspension as an ancillary power was recognised." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "DGSLKO15", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 227, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 218, "text": "Deshpande" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/444791" }

{ "text": "We have asked the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents to show us whether there is any such finding but he was not able to show such a finding recorded by the respondent No. 1 in case of petitioner Deshpande." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "PDGS3MWD", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 75, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 62, "text": "A.K. \n\n Singh" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/18716883/" }

{ "text": "I have heard Ld. Prosecutor for the State and Ld. Counsel Sh. A.K. \n\n Singh for the accused." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/663776" }

{ "text": "It would thus appear that none of the contentions advanced on behalf of the Insurance Company to escape from the liability with regard to the satisfaction of the whole of the award can be accepted." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1423369" }

{ "text": "For the reasons given in that judgment I am of the opinion that there is no substance in this contention." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "DMUBMB5S", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 138, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 93, "text": "Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. v. State of U.P" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/91417082" }

{ "text": "The question is well settled in view of the decision of a seven-Judge Bench of this Court in Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. v. State of U.P....... \n\n 25." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "civil_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/87199403" }

{ "text": "One of the oldest among these is the arbitration." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "5N37KU4W", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 49, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 35, "text": "Protection Act" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "JM7PXJA4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 126, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 97, "text": "Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "0AO2WIL8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 187, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 176, "text": "Revenue Act" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/998243" }

{ "text": ", 'Land-owner' is described in the Protection Act to mean a person who is defined as such in the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 (Act 17 of 1887--hereinafter referred to as the 'Revenue Act')." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "39TA5CN8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 31, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 25, "text": "Mumbai" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "AFLCWPQC", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 68, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 62, "text": "Bhatia" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "EGX2JFZ1", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 131, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 119, "text": "Datta Samant" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/991728" }

{ "text": "The police officers from Mumbai had told the witness and Shri Bhatia that two accused connected with the murder of Dr. Datta Samant were staying in hotel Welcome Inn, cri-appeal-864-00 Room No. 202." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "Y0Z1C0TV", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 10, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 3, "text": "England" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "QKMSXMEM", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 104, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 82, "text": "Matrimonial Causes Act" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "T9U0S1TJ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 144, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 117, "text": "Family Law Reform Act, 1969" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "LF2KND81", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 185, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 158, "text": "Family Law Reform Act, 1987" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/419909" }

{ "text": "In England also, social reforms were introduced to supplement or improve upon the Matrimonial Causes Act by enacting Family Law Reform Act, 1969 and also the Family Law Reform Act, 1987 to confer limited right of succession to the illegitimate children in the property of their parents or allowing the parents to succeed to the property of their illegitimate children." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "J2WK7A4I", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 56, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 43, "text": "Indra Sawhney" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "PPQFCM2Y", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 141, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 131, "text": "13.12.1999" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "OYW72JWZ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 186, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 154, "text": "(2000) (1) SCC 168 (Second case)" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/905998" }

{ "text": "After the decision of the above matter the Indra Sawhney's case again came up for discussion in certain writ petitions, which were 13.12.1999 reported in (2000) (1) SCC 168 (Second case)." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "U6SCMJ53", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 16, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 4, "text": "Sushil Kumar" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "IRAJECFK", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 59, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 50, "text": "P.K. Sahi" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/147948079/" }

{ "text": "Sh. Sushil Kumar, learned defence counsel for A-6 P.K. Sahi has contended that he has been made a scapegoat and he was not involved in any misconduct." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/961637" }

{ "text": "Merely branching or trespassing in another field does not mean that it is a legislation on those topics." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "64WFVAIL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 61, "labels": [ "RESPONDENT" ], "start": 21, "text": "ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd." } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "H1IWZRUN", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 230, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 213, "text": "Jai Jai Ram Yadav" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "J5D4RI5N", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 256, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 246, "text": "24.12.2011" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "IV2G1XS8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 270, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 260, "text": "23.12.2012" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/194209870/" }

{ "text": "The respondent no. 3/ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. has produced R3W1, its Legal Manager who has stated in his affidavit EX.R3W1/A that offending vehicle i.e. HR 38 R 7272 was insured in the name of Sh. Jai Jai Ram Yadav for the period 24.12.2011 to 23.12.2012." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "1RRIMQRV", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 8, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 4, "text": "NCTE" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "0L2RQU98", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 41, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 32, "text": "23.8.2010" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/170250118" }

{ "text": "The NCTE issued Notification on 23.8.2010 to provide requisite qualification at different levels." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "UWYBJBO9", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 59, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 6, "text": "Subhita Kumari Versus State & Ors 50. 5550/2010 (nil)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "M6VI6HVP", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 98, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 60, "text": "Naroj Versus State & Ors 51. 5578/2010" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "AYF08SYH", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 149, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 105, "text": "Vimala Devi Versus State & Anr 52. 5583/2010" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "LLAFZ85C", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 205, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 156, "text": "Kum Komal Kumari Versus State & Ors 53. 5584/2010" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "WRCKEYR2", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 259, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 212, "text": "Shiv Raj Nagar Versus State & Ors 54. 5595/2010" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "QOPXRPB6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 319, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 266, "text": "Poonam Muraria & Anr Versus State & Ors 55. 5607/2010" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/19211303" }

{ "text": "(nil) Subhita Kumari Versus State & Ors 50. 5550/2010 (nil) Naroj Versus State & Ors 51. 5578/2010 (nil) Vimala Devi Versus State & Anr 52. 5583/2010 (nil) Kum Komal Kumari Versus State & Ors 53. 5584/2010 (nil) Shiv Raj Nagar Versus State & Ors 54. 5595/2010 (nil) Poonam Muraria & Anr Versus State & Ors 55. 5607/2010" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "6WRUC1M6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 13, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 3, "text": "26.07.1998" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "6IT5ZJOR", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 50, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 29, "text": "Mapillai K.H.Sulaiman" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "1RTECIMG", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 72, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 68, "text": "Boja" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "TR7TECSP", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 98, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 80, "text": "Paniyeravara Muthu" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "QQCQRHQX", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 122, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 105, "text": "Paniyeravara Baby" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "38XYA3A1", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 137, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 133, "text": "Bera" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "QW7L99MC", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 230, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 223, "text": "Prakash" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "K6X3X5Z1", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 246, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 236, "text": "Poojekallu" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "DFLJOD7F", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 263, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 250, "text": "Kutta village" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_karnataka_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/68020323" }

{ "text": "On 26.07.1998, accused no.1- Mapillai K.H.Sulaiman had engaged PW.2-Boja, PW.3- Paniyeravara Muthu, PW.4-Paniyeravara Baby and CW.5- Bera (not examined before the trial court) for plucking sweet potatoes in the land of one Prakash near Poojekallu of Kutta village." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "2MR64BJ0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 17, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 4, "text": "Supreme Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "2IMJUZ47", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 101, "labels": [ "JUDGE" ], "start": 95, "text": "Abbott" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "I89G9KNI", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 170, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 164, "text": "Stroud" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1818078" }

{ "text": "The Supreme Court then further observed as follows (page 427) : \n \"The word 'manufacture' said Abbott, C.J., in R. v. Wheeler, (1819) 2B & Ald. 345 (349), cited in Stroud's Judicial Dictionary (3rd ed.) Vol. 3, p. 1734." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "LQ4MFGX7", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 64, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 46, "text": "sub-regulation 92)" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "financial_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/34818882/" }

{ "text": "(3) The information memorandum referred to in sub-regulation 92) shall be dated and signed by all the directors of the scheme." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "8QHZF2GA", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 42, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 36, "text": "Harvey" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "AHSZUB8Q", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 232, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 226, "text": "Harvey" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "financial_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1433939/" }

{ "text": "It was further provided that should Harvey die before attaining the age of 55 years, the trustees would stand possessed of the capital value of the deferred annuity policy, upon trust to purchase therewith an annuity for Mrs. Harvey with the above insurance company or other insurance company of repute." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "GRCXXS9P", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 119, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 108, "text": "Section 125" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "1U3M39EP", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 124, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 120, "text": "CrPC" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/3469970" }

{ "text": "This Court finds that the said guidelines could be implemented by learned MM dealing with application under Section 125 CrPC seeking enforcement of orders awarding interim maintenance or maintenance." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_bombay_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/521658" }

{ "text": "If the compensation inclusive of 6% interest from the date of application is not paid by the appellants to the claimant within ihree months from today, it will carry 12% interest from the date of default." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "AR80P7GS", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 11, "labels": [ "RESPONDENT" ], "start": 0, "text": "Kamalakshan" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "PGC2YDLO", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 96, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 80, "text": "Kuriachan Chacko" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "5XFRK9C7", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 148, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 137, "text": "Section 420" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "D4HFOQ35", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 173, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 156, "text": "Indian Penal Code" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "N28KM40X", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 203, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 178, "text": "Sections 3, 4 and 5(c)(i)" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/446882" }

{ "text": "Kamalakshan, the first respondent, had filed a complaint on the allegation that Kuriachan Chacko had committed offences punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3, 4 and 5(c)(i) of the Act of 1978." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "X1GFW3WZ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 30, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 26, "text": "CFSL" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "FNWJ2AA8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 66, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 62, "text": "CFSL" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/55372782" }

{ "text": "The exhibits were sent to CFSL for examination and as per the CFSL report Exhibits PX and PY, human blood of blood group \"A\" was found on the clothes of the appellant as well as his co-accused, which matched with the blood group of the deceased." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "tax_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1134697/" }

{ "text": "It should also be borne in mind that in the case of a serious situation which renders the holding of an inquiry not reasonably practicable, it would be difficult to foresee how long the situation will last and when normalcy would return or be restored." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "YJWN0A9B", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 106, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 97, "text": "Section 8" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "EZRL7778", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 122, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 114, "text": "P.D. Act" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "H093DEH9", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 168, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 159, "text": "Section 7" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "D1YXZNBW", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 184, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 176, "text": "P.D. Act" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/210613" }

{ "text": "If, however, it is held that the said transaction was a private transfer, then it will be hit by Section 8 of the P.D. Act, in view of service of notice under Section 7 of the P.D. Act already effected upon the certificate-debtor." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/82211716" }

{ "text": "He also admitted that he never informed the police anything about the dispute between the deceased and the accused regarding land, well or Patta." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "financial_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/132847473/" }

{ "text": "Therefore, I hereby hold that the Complainant has proved and substantiated the allegations that the cheques in question Ex. CW1/1 and Ex. CW1/2 were issued by the accused in discharge of his legal liability and for consideration." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "HF8WZP4G", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 57, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 47, "text": "Apex Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "2ASJ7I1R", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 375, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 365, "text": "Section 23" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "K44K3Z6I", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 395, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 383, "text": "Contract Act" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_gujarat_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/994432" }

{ "text": "The effect of this dicta or observation of the Apex Court is that any stipulation in a contract of employment fixing the term of employment or providing for termination of service by giving a notice for certain specified period of time or payment of wages in lieu thereof will be void, arbitrary and discriminatory and also being opposed to the public policy under Section 23 of the Contract Act." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "X1WXJ5PZ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 27, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 17, "text": "Parliament" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/20720737/" }

{ "text": "It is common for Parliament to confer by Act on ministers and other executive bodies the power to make general rules with the force of law-to legislate." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/678597/" }

{ "text": "Whether the acts of the detenu forming the basis for arriving at a subjective satisfaction are too remote in point of time to induce any reasonable person to reach such subjective satisfaction must depend on the facts and circumstances of each case." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "41DZB25Q", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 78, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 71, "text": "Gujarat" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/105430/" }

{ "text": "The other rather unusual question interestingly raised by the State of Gujarat itself relates to improper conduct of trial by the public prosecutor." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "IBRQHBMK", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 60, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 57, "text": "SAC" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZQPV3X6W", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 115, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 101, "text": "Shella Village" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "7Z99W7JK", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 144, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 136, "text": "Shillong" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "FFYBZLF0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 179, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 173, "text": "Shella" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1725193/" }

{ "text": "The report further notes that most of the members of the SAC were not the residents of the locality (Shella Village) and were living in Shillong while occasionally visiting Shella." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "S4Q4HSRK", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 49, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 17, "text": "AstraZeneca Pharma India Limited" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "2VS96ZWX", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 98, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 93, "text": "India" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "3VM3790I", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 159, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 144, "text": "1st March, 2002" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1509899" }

{ "text": "Plaintiff No. 2, AstraZeneca Pharma India Limited, is stated to be a company incorporated in India which entered into a license agreement dated 1st March, 2002 with plaintiff No. 1 to use the trade mark 'MERONEM'." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "M3JXXPKQ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 30, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 1, "text": "Section 2 (1) (viii)--\"market" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "6IYQ47DF", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 96, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 87, "text": "Section 4" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1297969" }

{ "text": "\"Section 2 (1) (viii)--\"market area\" means any area declared to be a market area under Section 4.\"" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "S86XHVO6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 20, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 0, "text": "Crime No.174 of 2012" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "SESRDZE2", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 68, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 48, "text": "North Paravur Police" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "7WAXMFRU", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 174, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 147, "text": "Sections 279, 337 and 304 A" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "SL8I3V74", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 199, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 182, "text": "Indian Penal Code" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/17863297" }

{ "text": "Crime No.174 of 2012 has been registered by the North Paravur Police in respect of the incident, charge sheeting the petitioner for offences under Sections 279, 337 and 304 A of the Indian Penal Code." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "1POM5RDK", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 122, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 114, "text": "16.09.91" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "0P5O3L9G", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 183, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 171, "text": "Section 115J" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/95135/" }

{ "text": "The facts of the case are that the assessing officer passed the assessment order for the assessment year 90-91 on 16.09.91 and determined the income of the assessee Under Section 115J at Rs. 41,45,574/-." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZC1Y8N1V", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 80, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 75, "text": "India" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1559242" }

{ "text": "In this connection it is but right to remember that the law of evidence in India has been codified and the scheme thereof compels the Court to search for pigeon-holes of relevancy into which the material placed may be accommodated." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "Y9TXSA1E", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 23, "labels": [ "CASE_NUMBER" ], "start": 3, "text": "CWP No.10877 of 2008" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "QCOH6A1P", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 47, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 36, "text": "Malkit Kaur" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "FBE0HEVZ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 141, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 127, "text": "Burj Bhalai Ke" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "52WUW49D", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 359, "labels": [ "RESPONDENT" ], "start": 347, "text": "Satnam Singh" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1118998" }

{ "text": "In CWP No.10877 of 2008, petitioner Malkit Kaur, who contested the election for the seat of Panch of Gram Panchayat of Village Burj Bhalai Ke, Tehsil & District Mansa and nominated herself for the seat reserved for Woman and secured 441 votes and was declared defeated, has filed this petition for quashing the election result of respondent No.4- Satnam Singh, who secured only two votes." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "HLSMADXI", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 69, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 57, "text": "M.P.S.R.T.C." } } ] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1410133" }

{ "text": "As the fund is not being established and maintained, the M.P.S.R.T.C. cannot be allowed to ply the vehicles without insurance." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "V0010OSG", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 8, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 0, "text": "Sangeeta" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_rajasthan_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1797690" }

{ "text": "Sangeeta (PW 50) has identified her ornaments in the court and in the cross examination, the only question put to her was about the weight and design." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "W0M44850", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 123, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 118, "text": "Italy" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "KZUOTLQM", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 227, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 222, "text": "Italy" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_calcutta_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1885538" }

{ "text": "The appellant as an established shipper chose 1946 as their basic year but in that year they had made no shipments to Italy and so in the allotment of quota that was made in their favour, they got no quota for shipment to Italy." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "motorvehicles_madhya_pradesh_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/109801351" }

{ "text": "None ap p eared f or the ap pellant ev en" }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "7TVMNY6O", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 13, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 3, "text": "07.10.2004" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "HWG1X1ZE", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 78, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 64, "text": "Jyotish Prasad" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "A7K5SO6P", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 89, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 83, "text": "Ashish" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "VBJHW07O", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 112, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 93, "text": "Safdarjung Hospital" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/167642591" }

{ "text": "On 07.10.2004, the blood samples were drawn from the appellants Jyotish Prasad and Ashish at Safdarjung Hospital." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "LXH2XMX0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 39, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 31, "text": "5.9.2006" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "SPG2WZEF", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 53, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 44, "text": "24.6.2006" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "4KNHWHC4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 119, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 99, "text": "C.M.M., Kanpur Nagar" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/318590" }

{ "text": "Both the impugned orders dated 5.9.2006 and 24.6.2006 were quashed and the matter was sent back to C.M.M., Kanpur Nagar to decide application of the petitioner widow for registration of her FIR afresh." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "3A3PB2WD", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 155, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 129, "text": "Lotus Labs Private Limited" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/59228363" }

{ "text": "Admittedly, the Appellant/Defendant herein has launched the drug, namely, Efavirenz 600 mg tablets and the tablets are tested at Lotus Labs Private Limited and it was manufactured on November 2006." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "6DA47YST", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 19, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 3, "text": "October 13, 1939" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ULCMVIKJ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 36, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 24, "text": "Krishna Nair" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "civil_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/441001/" }

{ "text": "On October 13, 1939 one Krishna Nair made a complaint (Ex. AH) against plaintiff's men of beating and dacoity." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "8EMLJPOK", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 110, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 98, "text": "Bhatia Group" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/103127138" }

{ "text": "In the present case, the notices were issued to about 70 persons on the documents seized from the Bhatia Group." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "XIRGDMK3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 145, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 136, "text": "23-5-1990" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "9ANY8MRF", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 235, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 226, "text": "29-8-1978" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "industrial&labour_madras_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/755172" }

{ "text": "Instead of that, after lapse of 10 years from the date of Division Bench judgment, the first respondent issued the fresh charge memo on 23-5-1990 by way of Government letter without any difference of earlier charge memo dated 29-8-1978." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1938988/" }

{ "text": "This should be done vertically and horizontally." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "SGPO7CN5", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 40, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 27, "text": "Supreme Court" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "QCQWWZA9", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 135, "labels": [ "PRECEDENT" ], "start": 53, "text": "Navinchandra N. Majithia v. Stale of Meghalaya and Ors.. JT [2000] Suppl. 1 SC 538" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1285195/" }

{ "text": "(see a country view of our Supreme Court recently in Navinchandra N. Majithia v. Stale of Meghalaya and Ors.. JT [2000] Suppl. 1 SC 538)." }

[ { "result": [] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/57957906" }

{ "text": "That the injury found on the head of the deceased was caused by a blunt object and the injury found on the neck was caused by a sharp object." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "5CR1DE4F", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 62, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 52, "text": "Section 26" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "TMNBBFX4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 79, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 70, "text": "Bihar Act" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "TDA76HE4", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 170, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 156, "text": "3rd June, 1960" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/50908" }

{ "text": "It was, therefore, contended that the provisions of Section 26 of the Bihar Act have no application to the case and the order of the Labour Court dated the 3rd June, 1960, is ultra vires and without jurisdiction." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "4LSGCFM0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 41, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 19, "text": "YOGENDRA KUMAR JAISWAL" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "L8LGHEKO", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 279, "labels": [ "RESPONDENT" ], "start": 265, "text": "STATE OF BIHAR" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "constitution_patna_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/199851373" }

{ "text": "No.10735 OF 2010 1-YOGENDRA KUMAR JAISWAL S/O LATE JAGANNATH PRASAD R/O SHIVPURI, PROFESSOR'S COLONY ROAD, P.S.- SHASTRI NAGAR, DISTT.-\nPATNA- 800023.............................................................(PETITIONER)\n Versus 1-THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, BIHAR," }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "BVLGZXOE", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 69, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 37, "text": "Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd." } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "O51AM9K6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 100, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 76, "text": "Hindlaco Industries Ltd." } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "TT1NJOKZ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 127, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 108, "text": "Tranex Holding Inc." } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "5OBL8EVQ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 163, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 132, "text": "Indian Minerals Corporation Plc" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "B90X3DS6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 195, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 170, "text": "VAW Aluminium AG, Germany" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "9GZVJCT2", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 210, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 200, "text": "ALCOA, USA" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "CS0LI2T7", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 232, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 216, "text": "Sibirsky, Russia" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "TDYPTH2B", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 244, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 239, "text": "MALCO" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "NJ2FXA58", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 267, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 252, "text": "Jardine Fleming" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "F2H4GMG3", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 399, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 394, "text": "India" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "criminal_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1737583/" }

{ "text": "These companies were as follows:\n\"i. Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd. \n\nii. Hindlaco Industries Ltd. \n\niii. Tranex Holding Inc. iv. Indian Minerals Corporation Plc. \n\nv. VAW Aluminium AG, Germany vi. ALCOA, USA vii. Sibirsky, Russia viii. MALCO\" \n\nM/s Jardine Fleming, Global Advisor made an analysis of the various bids on the basis of the financial and technical capability, familiarity with India and overall credibility." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "T3XJW4Y2", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 24, "labels": [ "OTHER_PERSON" ], "start": 12, "text": "H.D. Mundhra" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "KDUPOMK8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 66, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 33, "text": "Roop Narain Ram Chandra (P.) Ltd." } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "RLBSKZNG", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 173, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 154, "text": "Kanpur Cotton Mills" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "XOTIS61M", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 195, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 175, "text": "Kanpur Textiles Ltd." } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZCBPSIBI", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 220, "labels": [ "ORG" ], "start": 200, "text": "Elgin Mills Co. Ltd." } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1450436" }

{ "text": "The case of H.D. Mundhra is that Roop Narain Ram Chandra (P.) Ltd. were indebted to the Corporation to the tune of Rs. 30,00,000 as selling agents of the Kanpur Cotton Mills, Kanpur Textiles Ltd. and Elgin Mills Co. Ltd., that their financial condition was not sound, and that their offer was, therefore, not accepted." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "1LNJKS9D", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 13, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 0, "text": "Section 14(4)" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "OH1FE3V8", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 41, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 21, "text": "Kerala Education Act" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_kerala_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/74011404" }

{ "text": "Section 14(4) of the Kerala Education Act also cannot be invoked to keep alive indefinitely, the proceeding for taking over the management of an aided school." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "ZAY922F9", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 17, "labels": [ "WITNESS" ], "start": 4, "text": "Sandeep Gupta" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "D3HC4YSZ", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 113, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 103, "text": "18.03.2004" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "financial_districtcourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/94286093/" }

{ "text": "Sh. Sandeep Gupta has been examined as CW 1 and has relied upon the certified copy of resolution dated 18.03.2004 of Board of Directors of complainant as Ex. CW 1/A whereby he has been authorized to appear on behalf of the complainant company." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "R9BN45FP", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 22, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 7, "text": "21st July, 1950" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "37PGSSMD", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 56, "labels": [ "RESPONDENT" ], "start": 39, "text": "Subodh Gopal Bose" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "DQ82XO8U", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 101, "labels": [ "COURT" ], "start": 76, "text": "Additional District Judge" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "5HLC1H4Z", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 175, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 164, "text": "article 228" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "OY4ZYUM0", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 204, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 183, "text": "Constitution of India" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "0RCMKHHL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 271, "labels": [ "PROVISION" ], "start": 262, "text": "section 7" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "UVJX0H3C", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 316, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 304, "text": "Constitution" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_supremecourts judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/973363/" }

{ "text": "On the 21st July, 1950, the respondent Subodh Gopal Bose applied before the Additional District Judge before whom the' appeal was pending to make a reference under article 228 of the Constitution of India for a decision of the question whether the provisions of section 7 were void being ultra vires the Constitution." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "USZXID07", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 64, "labels": [ "PETITIONER" ], "start": 53, "text": "Amrik Singh" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_punjab-haryana_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/90646729" }

{ "text": "It was wrong to suggest that the Police did not take Amrik Singh (appellant No.1) and his brothers forcibly." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "AMUHRGQ5", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 15, "labels": [ "STATUTE" ], "start": 4, "text": "Clayton Act" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "LZU28ZOL", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 220, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 207, "text": "United states" } }, { "from_name": "label", "id": "8BDINMF6", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 264, "labels": [ "GPE" ], "start": 244, "text": "District of Columbia" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_allahabad_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1057586" }

{ "text": "The Clayton Act prescribed a special procedure and punishment for trial of contempts, consisting of wilful disobediance of a lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree or command of any district Court of the United states or of any court of the District of Columbia, if the acts of contempt were also liable to be punished as criminal offences." }

[ { "result": [ { "from_name": "label", "id": "GPID82ED", "to_name": "text", "type": "labels", "value": { "end": 48, "labels": [ "DATE" ], "start": 30, "text": "16th January, 2003" } } ] } ]

{ "source": "tax_delhi_high_court judgement https://indiankanoon.org/doc/138839658" }

{ "text": "The present suit was filed on 16th January, 2003 with the prayer that a decree for possession, permanent injunction and recovery should be passed." }