Another researcher has come out complaining about how a religious right “expert” distorted her work to stigmatize the lgbtq community. 

According to Box Turtle Bulletin, Rick Fitzgibbons of the NARTH (the National Association of Research and Therapy of Homosexuality) wrote a piece about same-sex adoption.  In the piece, Fitzgibbons cited the work of Seton Hall professor Dr. Theodora Sirota to make the case that children in same sex households are not raised better than children “in stable homes with a mother and a father.” 

To support his denunciation of same-sex adoption, Fitzgibbons offers this summary of Sirota’s research:

Researchers interviewed 68 women with gay or bisexual fathers and 68 women with heterosexual fathers.  The women (average age 29 in both groups) with gay or bisexual fathers had difficulty with adult attachment issues in three areas: they were less comfortable with closeness and intimacy; they were less able to trust and depend on others; and they experienced more anxiety in relationships compared to the women raised by heterosexual fathers. 

The problem is not with what Fitzgibbons said; it’s what he left out: The gay and bisexual fathers in Sirota’s study were married to the mothers. 

Dr. Sirota’s article is about the impact of a homosexual father raising a girl in a heterosexual marriage.  It has nothing to do with same-sex couples, nothing to do with same-sex adoption at all. 

Or as Dr. Sirota says in her letter:

. . .  no conclusions about gay or lesbian fitness to adopt children or quality of active gay parenting can be drawn from the findings of my research.  No conclusions about the well-being of children who are or were actively raised by gay or lesbian parents can be drawn from the findings of my research.” 

While NARTH is looked upon as experts on the lgbtq community in religious right circles, the mainstream scientific community pretty much ignores the groups’s research and with good reason. 

According to Truth Wins Out, several NARTH members have been embroiled in controversies including:

Gerald Schoenwolf, PhD, a member of NARTH’ “Scientific Advisory Committee,” who wrote a piece on the group’s website that seemed to justify slavery

NARTH psychiatrist Joseph Berger, MD, another member of its “Scientific Advisory Committee,” who wrote a paper encouraging students to “ridicule” gender variant children. 

Also, according to Truth Wins Out:

NARTH’ co-founder, Joesph Nicolosi encourages male clients to become more masculine by drinking Gatorade and referring to friends as “dude”.  NARTH therapists have been known to practice rubber band therapy, where a gay client is made to wear a rubber band and snap it on his wrist when sexually stimulated.  It is a mild form of aversion therapy meant to “snap” the client out of the moment of attraction.  NARTH members have also been known to practice “touch therapy”, where a client sits in the therapist’ lap for up to an hour, while the therapist caresses him. 

In 2010, another member of NARTH, George Rekers, resigned from the organization after caught coming from a vacation overseas with a “rentboy.” 

Unfortunately the distortion of legitimate scientific work by religious right experts is not done solely by NARTH.  Other groups have gotten into trouble over this sadly overlooked aspect of the so-called culture wars.  Over the years, there have been 11 other complaints from researchers about how their work was being distorted by religious right and so-called “pro-family” groups, including:

Six researchers of a 1997 Canadian study (Robert S. Hogg, Stefan A. Strathdee, Kevin J.P. Craib, Michael V. Shaughnessy, Julio Montaner, and Martin T. Schehter), who complained in 2001 that religious right groups were distorting their work to claim that gay men have a short life span. 

The authors of the book Unequal Opportunity: Health Disparities Affecting Gay and Bisexual Men in the United States (Professors Richard J. Wolitski, Ron Stall, and Ronald O. Valdiserri), who complained that their work was being distorted by Focus on the Family. 

University of Utah professor Lisa Diamond, who complained that NARTH (the National Association of Research and Therapy of Homosexuality), a group which also share board members with the American College of Pediatricians, distorted her research on sexual orientation. 

Dr. Carol Gilligan, Professor of Education and Law at New York University, who complained that former Focus on the Family head James Dobson misrepresented her research to attack LGBT families. 

Dr. Kyle Pruett, Ph.D., a professor of child psychiatry at the Yale School of Medicine, who has also complained that Focus on the Family distorted his work. 

Dr. Robert Spitzer, Professor of Psychiatry at Columbia University, who has consistently complained that religious right groups distorted his study to claim that the LGBT orientation is easily changeable. 

Judith Stacey, Professor of Sociology at New York University, who has had to, on more than one occasion, cry foul over how religious right groups distorted her work on LGBT families. 

Greg Remafedi, Professor at the University of Minnesota, who has complained several times about how religious right groups such as the American College of Pediatricians and PFOX have distorted his work, all to no avail.  The American College of Pediatricians refused his request to remove his work from their site. 

Last year, Tom Minnery, a spokesman from Focus on the Family, was dressed down by Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) during a Congressional hearing for deliberately misrepresenting a study.  Minnery initially used the study to claim, as Fitzgibbons did in his misrepresentation, that same-sex households are inferior to two parent mother/father households. 

I find it hard to believe that anyone is surprised that this group would lie.  This same group of religious zealots have taken their faith and the supposed book that is their faith and have spun lies and half-truths throughout history in this country.  They have used this book to lie,cheat, steal and rape,pillage and plunder all around the world.  Loss of life or ability to survive means nothing to them as long as it’s someone else.  If they actually believe as they say they do they should be verrrrry afraid.  I have often wondered why these individuals run when it starts raining, it has to be either fear of lightning or that shit melts. 

Personally I think there ought to be a lot more “decrdentialing” going on, where people with science degrees lose them when they blatantly use legitimate research to support a predrawn conclusion based on ideology.  The same should apply to all disciplines. 

Oh, joelmael, you know that you can’t be certain about anything on Wikipedia. 

Based on experience, it seems many of us (not just Wikipedia) misunderstood the 8th Commandment.  It’s an easy mistake to make, because so many of the others have “NOT” in them.  However, apparently the TRUE wording, known only to the variety of the self-proclaimed Christians of NARTH, NOM, et al, is”