Endometrial myomectomy: a novel surgical method during cesarean section. 
Comparing surgical outcomes of a novel surgical technique endometrial myomectomy (EM) to serosal myomectomy (SM) during ceserean section (CS).  Retrospective cohort study (Canadian task force classification level II 1).  Private hospital.  Fourty-six women with leiomyomas during cesarean section Interventions: Endometrial myomectomy and serosal myomectomy during cesarean section between 2013 and 2016.  Total 22 consequtive cases (Group 1) underwent EM in the last 2 years.  The control group created from SM (Group 2) cases performed before EM implemented in our practice.  Group 2 was matched based on anteriorly located intramural or submucosal leiomyoma.  The size, location and number of leiomyoma, hematological course during pre- and postoperative period, the need for blood transfusion, duration of surgery, and any prolongation of hospital stay also documented.  Median number of leiomyoma was higher in EM than in SM (p = 0.001).  Median myomectomy procedure time and amount of intra-operative bleeding in SM were higher than EM (respectively, p = 0.005 and p = 0.001).  In terms of other variables, there is no difference between the two myomectomy groups (p > 0.05).  This novel technique EM is a safe, feasible surgical technique compared with SM.  Besides the less intra-operative blood loss, it also has the potential to diminish the risk of abdominal adhesion formation.