I'm wondering why, Fred, you take the time to list the over PPG of each team for each tournament.  This statistic is a highly dubious one to compare any teams.  If you look at CR's PPG, you'd assume we just can't score a lot per game, but that's because we keep qualifying for the playoffs in these tough DC tournaments and then losing a lot of the afternoon games to schools clearly better than us. 

For instance, this past weekend at TJ, our overall PPG was 277, certainly respectable.  But in the morning rounds, it was 359.  If we had, instead, made the middle consolation bracket, i'm sure we would have had a much higher PPG for the whole day. 

I'm just saying that listing PPG is about as good as listing wins.  We won just 4 games Saturday, but we were 6th place.  If you're going to list PPG, why not then wins too?  It's just as useful, by which i mean only barely useful. 

Oh, NO, NO, NO, Fred -- Oh, Ye, of little faith!  As someone who has something of a professional interest in "faith" let me assure you that others (myself!)  have GREAT FAITH in what I can only term an innovative, insightful, and, well, satisfying set of outcomes.  Self-serving on my part?  Absolutely!  Does that bother me?  Well, with this being Holy Week and the particulars of my job description being what they are, yes, it does bother me a tiny bit.  But, I'm sure I can be persuaded to continue enjoying these new "results".  Just sign me LOL IN TEXAS!  PS: Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa! 

I'm not sure if you're still continuing the high school rankings Fred, but in case you are, Irvine High School hosted their Operation Pandemonium tournament today with the IS-116 set and they promptly posted the complete stats: http://hsquizbowl.org/db/tournaments/938

Erogo wrote:I'm not sure if you're still continuing the high school rankings Fred, but in case you are, Irvine High School hosted their Operation Pandemonium tournament today with the IS-116 set and they promptly posted the complete stats: http://hsquizbowl.org/db/tournaments/938

There was an update a week ago, so yeah, it's still going on.  I'll add those results when I can. 

Just in case you care about details of the situation of small teams that don't really matter that might impact their rankings...Irvington A, at the NY NAQT NYC-Metro Area State Championship on April 14 was missing one of its best players in the morning rounds, so our afternoon rounds might be a more accurate representation of our team than the tournament as a whole: and to save you calculation our afternoon PPB was 20.41, while for the whole tournament it ended up being 18.82. 

Something to note about Norcross's stats at the Georgia Tech HSNCT Warmup: There was only one player on the "A" team, since we made a "B" team out of the other two players originally on the first team to replace a team that had dropped out on short notice.  Here are the stats: http://hsquizbowl.org/db/tournaments/96 ... all_games/.

Edit: Sorry for the repeat of Hernan's post.  I didn't see it before adding this one. 

For what it's worth, you can use the stats from wildcat and midwest championship under "Something Ambiguous" for DCC B. We were a man down also. 

Collin ParksUniversity of Michigan '18

"Aragorn was the famed king of Gondor, while the Iberian kingdom was Aragon.  Both parties were aware of this coincidence: we have a journal entry from Aragorn that expresses his anger at receiving mail meant for King Peter IV of Aragon for the umpteenth time. "~ CommodoreCoCo

The last, real postings certainly give Cistercian both hope about the competition and something tangible to shoot for.  We plan to do both.  Between monastic ascesis and apatheia, on the one hand, and adolescent exuberance on the other, I think we'll do just fine.  Thanks for all the rankings work.  See y'all in Atlanta & St. Louis. 

Gregory SchweersCounty of DallasCity of IrvingCistercian Preparatory School TeamThe only Monk on this whole board

So according to the stats DAFT was the hardest high school set this year by far? 

Nick ConderLouisville, KY

"Your Honor, years ago I recognized my kinship with all living beings, and I made up my mind that I was not one bit better than the meanest on earth.  I said then, and I say now, that while there is a lower class, I am in it, and while there is a criminal element I am of it, and while there is a soul in prison, I am not free. "--Eugene V. Debs

I wouldn't advise looking at the appb values as the sole way of determining difficulty; in fact, I would say that the values on the spreadsheet (which I'll update and post, along with some of a write up, at.... some point in the near-ish future) are more important.  The "adjustment" values are rounded some for my ease of use, and only consider the top 200-300 teams by ppb.  I think it's far more important to look at things like the median and the first quartile values, since the performance of lower teams is more telling of the difficulty of a set. 

All that said?  Without having the data in front of me right now, DAFT was definitely one of the three or so hardest actual high school sets this year, and might be the hardest.