Thousands of defiant masked protesters streamed into Hong Kong streets Friday after the city’s embattled leader Carrie Lam invoked colonial-era emergency powers to ban masks in a bid to quell violence at anti-government demonstrations. 

Advertising Read more

Challenging the ban set to take effect Saturday, protesters crammed streets in the central business district and other areas, shouting “Hong Kong people, resist”. 

Lam said at an afternoon news conference that the mask ban, imposed under a colonial-era Emergency Ordinance that was last used over half a century ago, targets violent protesters and rioters and “will be an effective deterrent to radical behavior”. 

The ban applies to all public gatherings, both unauthorised and those approved by police. 

Crowds took to the streets even before the decision was announced.  Banks and shops in the busy Central district closed early in anticipation of violence as some protesters burned Chinese flags and chanted "You burn with us", and "Hong Kongers, revolt". 

Thousands of demonstrators gathered in other parts of the territory, filling shopping malls and blocking roads as protests looked set to continue into the night.  Bus routes were suspended and rail operator MTR closed stations. 

'There is quite a lot of anger.'  Oliver Farry reports from Hong Kong

Announcing the measure, Lam stressed it doesn’t mean the semi-autonomous Chinese territory is in a state of emergency.  She said she would go to the legislature later to get legal backing for the rule. 

“We must save Hong Kong, the present Hong Kong and the future Hong Kong,” she said. “ We must stop the violence ... we can’t just leave the situation to get worse and worse.” 

Two activists immediately filed legal challenges in court on grounds that the mask ban will instill fear and curtail freedom of speech and assembly. 

‘Trying to intimidate us’

The ban makes the wearing of full or partial face coverings, including face paint, at public gatherings punishable by one year in jail.  A six-month jail term could be imposed on people who refuse a police officer’s order to remove a face covering for identification. 

Masks will be permitted for “legitimate need”, when their wearers can prove that they need them for work, health or religious reasons. 

"Will they arrest 100,000 people on the street?  The government is trying to intimidate us but at this moment, I don't think the people will be scared," said a protester who gave his surname as Lui. 

Lam wouldn’t rule out a further toughening of measures if violence continues.  She said she would not resign because “stepping down is not something that will help the situation” when Hong Kong is in “a very critical state of public danger”. 

‘I will still keep my mask on’

“The Hong Kong police are also wearing their masks when they're doing their job.  And they don't show their pass and their number,” said protester Ernest Ho. “ So I will still keep my mask on everywhere." 

Hong Kong protesters took to streets wearing face masks defying ban

Face masks have become a hallmark of protesters in Hong Kong, even at peaceful marches, amid fears of retribution at work or of being denied access to schooling, public housing and other government-funded services.  Some young protesters also wear full gas masks and goggles to protect against police tear gas. 

Many also are concerned their identities could be shared with the massive state-security apparatus that helps keep the Communist Party in power across the border in mainland China, where high-tech surveillance including facial recognition technology is ubiquitous. 

Dangerous precedent warnings

Analysts said the use of the Emergency Ordinance set a dangerous precedent.  The law, a relic of British rule enacted in 1922 to quell a seamen’s strike and last used to crush riots in 1967, gives broad powers to the city’s chief executive to implement regulations in an emergency. 

“It is a dangerous first step.  If the anti-mask legislation proves to be ineffective, it could lead the way to more draconian measures such as a curfew and other infringement of civil liberties,” said Willy Lam, adjunct professor at the Chinese University. 

However, Carrie Lam bristled at a suggestion that the ban nudges Hong Kong closer to the authoritarian rule imposed by the Communist Party across the rest of China.  She insisted she was not acting under orders from the central government in Beijing, which she visited this week when Communist Party leaders celebrated 70 years in power on Tuesday. 

The ban followed widespread violence in the city Tuesday that marred China’s National Day and included a police officer shooting a protester, the first victim of gunfire since the protests started in June over a now-shelved extradition bill.  The wounded teenager was charged with attacking police and rioting. 

The movement has snowballed into an anti-China campaign amid anger over what many view as Beijing’s interference in Hong Kong’s autonomy.  More than 1,750 people have been detained so far. 

Activists and many legislators have warned the mask ban could be counterproductive, impractical and difficult to enforce in a city bubbling with anger and where tens of thousands have often defied police bans on rallies. 

The government last month withdrew the extradition bill, widely slammed as an example of the erosion of Hong Kong’s freedom, but protesters have widened their demands to include direct elections of the city’s leaders, an independent inquiry into alleged police brutality, the unconditional release of protesters and not characterising the protests as riots. 

“Five demands, not one less!”  many protesters shouted during Friday’s rallies as they held up five fingers. 

(FRANCE 24 with AP and REUTERS)

Daily newsletterReceive essential international news every morning Subscribe