The usefulness of the maximum Hounsfield units (HU) in predicting the shockwave lithotripsy outcome for ureteral stones and the proposal of novel indicators using the maximum HU. 
Computed tomography (CT) attenuation value of ureteral stones is one of the predictors of shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) outcome.  It is common to use the mean Hounsfield units (HU) to describe the CT attenuation value.  However, an observer bias can occur when measuring the mean HU in the conventional method.  On the other hand, our way to obtain only the maximum HU is simpler and less biased.  We retrospectively evaluated 464 patients with ureteral stones who underwent SWL and compared predictive accuracy of various factors including maximum and mean HU.  Results were determined after a single SWL.  Predictors of SWL success were examined by the statistical analysis of successful and failed groups.  324 of the 464 patients who underwent SWL were stone-free after a single SWL.  Significant differences were found in factors related to CT attenuation value and stone size.  As a result of receiver operating characteristic analysis, it was found that maximum HU and mean HU, major diameter and volume have equivalent prediction accuracy, respectively.  Multivariate analysis revealed that maximum HU and major diameter were included in independent predictors.  We also examined the new original indicators using maximum HU and major diameter.  Stone-resistant probability obtained from the logistic model and Maximum HU and Major diameter Index obtained by multiplying maximum HU by major diameter were useful for predicting SWL success, respectively.  In conclusion, maximum HU and mean HU have equivalent predictive accuracy, and maximum HU is easier to measure and less biased than mean HU.