1.  Introduction {#sec1-animals-10-00982}
===============

Environmental stressors such as disease and heat stress are the major problems faced by global poultry production, having negative influences on animal physiology, behaviour, health and productive performance, causing tremendous economic losses \[[@B1-animals-10-00982],[@B2-animals-10-00982],[@B3-animals-10-00982],[@B4-animals-10-00982],[@B5-animals-10-00982]\].  They can adversely affect the biological macromolecules such as proteins, lipids, carbohydrates and DNA by the generation and accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and free radicals in the cells while performing their normal metabolic functions \[[@B6-animals-10-00982],[@B7-animals-10-00982],[@B8-animals-10-00982]\], resulting in cell damage and the appearance of pathological symptoms \[[@B9-animals-10-00982],[@B10-animals-10-00982]\].  To mitigate the adverse impacts of stressful environmental conditions on poultry and to promote the animal's health and growth performance, antibiotics at sub-therapeutic doses have been added to poultry diets as growth promoters \[[@B11-animals-10-00982],[@B12-animals-10-00982],[@B13-animals-10-00982]\].  However, the improper and overuse of antibiotics as feed additives have played a major role in the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and increased the levels of antibiotic residues in animal products, which have disastrous effects on the health of both animals and humans \[[@B14-animals-10-00982],[@B15-animals-10-00982]\].  Thus, the use of antibiotics in farming livestock has been prohibited in the EU \[[@B16-animals-10-00982],[@B17-animals-10-00982]\].  Ascorbic acid is a natural antioxidant and health-promoting agent that has great potential to substitute antibiotics as growth promoters in fighting bacterial infections \[[@B18-animals-10-00982],[@B19-animals-10-00982]\], and have been thought to be beneficial for heat-stressed broiler chickens.  Dietary supplementation of ascorbic acid has the advantage of compensating for incompetent biosynthesis of ascorbic acid and has the potential to ameliorate the harmful effects of hot climate in broiler chickens \[[@B20-animals-10-00982]\].  Data from several studies suggest that ascorbic acid supplementation may compensate for the reduction in growth rate and feed intake \[[@B21-animals-10-00982],[@B22-animals-10-00982]\], improve overall growth performance, antioxidant status and meat quality, and reduce serum concentrations of corticosterone, acute phase proteins, cholesterol and lipid oxidation \[[@B23-animals-10-00982],[@B24-animals-10-00982]\]. 

Using postbiotics as dietary additives for livestock and potential alternatives to antibiotics, postbiotics produced from the probiotic *Lactobacillus plantarum* have been the subject of several recent kinds of research.  The mechanism of action of postbiotics is not different from that of probiotics, owing to the fact that the same secondary metabolites from probiotics are present in the postbiotics, but not the living cells \[[@B25-animals-10-00982]\].  Postbiotics contain several antimicrobial components including bacteriocins and organic acids, which can minimise the pH of the gut and prevent the proliferation of pathogens in both the feed and animal gut \[[@B26-animals-10-00982]\].  Recent evidence suggests that the postbiotics produced by *L. plantarum* strains have an inhibitory effect on several gut pathogens, such as vancomycin-resistant Enterococci, *Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella typhimurium* and *Escherichia coli* \[[@B27-animals-10-00982],[@B28-animals-10-00982],[@B29-animals-10-00982],[@B30-animals-10-00982]\].  It has recently been observed that the dietary supplementation of postbiotics promoted the health and growth performance in broilers \[[@B31-animals-10-00982],[@B32-animals-10-00982],[@B33-animals-10-00982]\], layers \[[@B34-animals-10-00982],[@B35-animals-10-00982]\] and piglets \[[@B36-animals-10-00982],[@B37-animals-10-00982]\].  More recently, postbiotics have been revealed to enhance the growth performance, rumen fermentation, immune status and gastrointestinal health in small ruminants \[[@B38-animals-10-00982],[@B39-animals-10-00982]\].  Under normal environmental temperature, dietary supplementation of postbiotics improved health and growth performance of broiler chickens by promoting their immune status, growth genes expression and gut health, as their supplementation significantly improved the intestinal villus, decreased the population of Enterobacteriaceae and faecal pH, and increased the population of lactic acid bacteria \[[@B25-animals-10-00982],[@B31-animals-10-00982],[@B32-animals-10-00982],[@B33-animals-10-00982],[@B40-animals-10-00982]\].  Moreover, improvements in broiler meat quality and reduction in plasma cholesterol were observed with dietary supplementation of postbiotics in broilers \[[@B35-animals-10-00982],[@B40-animals-10-00982],[@B41-animals-10-00982],[@B42-animals-10-00982]\].  Our recent findings from a companion study \[[@B43-animals-10-00982]\] revealed that dietary supplementation of postbiotics produced from *L. plantarum* increased body weight, body weight gain, feed conversion ratio (FCR), intestinal villus height, immune response, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and growth hormone receptor (GHR) mRNA expression, caecum non-pathogenic bacteria population, and reduced Enterobacteriaceae and *E. coli* population in heat-stressed broilers. 

Aside from developing a healthy gut and promoting growth performance, a preliminary study from this laboratory revealed that the postbiotics produced by *L. plantarum* have high antioxidant activities \[[@B44-animals-10-00982]\].  Similarly, bacterial cultures of *L. plantarum* were reported to exhibit high antioxidative activities \[[@B45-animals-10-00982],[@B46-animals-10-00982]\].  Whilst considerable research has investigated the beneficial impacts of postbiotics on broiler chickens under normal temperature, there is still a scarcity of information on their impacts on heat-stressed broilers.  Therefore, the outlook of this work was to examine the impacts of feeding three different postbiotics on antioxidant enzyme activity, total antioxidant, lipid peroxidation, heat shock protein 70, acute phase proteins, lipid profile and meat quality in heat-stressed broiler chickens. 

2.  Materials and Methods {#sec2-animals-10-00982}
========================

2.1.  Postbiotics Production {#sec2dot1-animals-10-00982}
---------------------------

The three different *Lactobacillus plantarum* strains, RS5, RI11 and UL4 were procured from the Industrial Biotechnology Laboratory, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University Putra Malaysia.  The DNA was sequenced by Moghadam et al.  \[[@B47-animals-10-00982]\] who differentiated between the *L. plantarum* strains, while their ability for producing different amino acids was recently determined by Lim et al.  \[[@B48-animals-10-00982]\].  The three different cultures were preserved by the revival of cultures following Foo et al. 's procedure \[[@B49-animals-10-00982]\].  The cultures were kept at −20 °C in De Man, Rogosa and Sharpe MRS medium (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) with 20% (*v*/*v*) glycerol. 

A volume of 100 µL from each stock culture was activated in 10 mL MRS broth, incubated at 30 °C for 48 h and sub-cultured in the same media for another 24 h. The activated cultures were spread onto a plate and incubated at 30 °C for 48 h. An individual colony was picked from the plate, inoculated twice into MRS broth (10 mL) and incubated at 30 °C for 48 h and 24 h. Active cells of *L. plantarum* (RI11, UL4 and RS5) were first washed using a 0.85% (*w*/*v*) NaCl (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) sterile solution, then adjusted to 10^9^ CFU/mL and used as an inoculum.  For preparing the working cultures of the three *L. plantarum* strains (RS5, UL4 and RI11), 10% (*v*/*w*) 10^9^ CFU/mL active bacterial cells were inoculated into MRS media, incubated for 10 h at 30 °C, and centrifuged at 10,000× *g* for 15 min at 4 °C.  Cell-free supernatant (CFS) was filtered using a 0.22 µm cellulose acetate membrane (Sartorius Minisart, Gottingen, Germany) following the procedure outlined in detail by Loh et al.  \[[@B50-animals-10-00982]\].  The harvested CFS (postbiotic) was kept at −20 °C until further analysis. 

2.2.  Ethical Note, Birds, Experimental Design and Housing {#sec2dot2-animals-10-00982}
---------------------------------------------------------

The feeding trial was performed at the research facilities of the Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security (ITAFoS), University Putra Malaysia.  The experiment was conducted in conferment with the approved guidelines by the Animal Ethics Committee of the University Putra Malaysia (protocol no.  UPM/ACUC/AUP-R085/2018), which ascertains that the use and care of research animals are ethical and humane.  Two hundred and fifty-two Cobb 500 male chicks (one-day-old) were supplied by a local hatchery.  The chicks were housed in wire-floor cages placed in two identical rooms.  The rooms were environmentally controlled with each of the two measuring 9.1 × randomised 3.8 × 2.3 m, length × width × height, whereas measurement of each cage was 120 (length) × 120 (width) × 45 (height) cm.  The birds were reared following the management recommendations of Cobb 500 from 1 to 21 days of age (starter period).  The chickens in the two rooms were maintained at the recommended temperature of 32 ± 1 °C on the first day, and gradually reduced to around 24 ± 1 °C by 21 days of age.  During the finisher period (day 22 to day 42), the birds were divided into 6 treatment groups, 7 replicates per group with 6 chicks in each replicate.  The birds were offered 1 of 6 diets: (1) A basal diet without any supplementation as negative control (NC); (2) basal diet + 0.02% (*w*/*w*) oxytetracycline as positive control (PC); (3) basal diet + 0.02% (*w*/*w*) ascorbic acid as antioxidant control (AA); or basal diet + 0.3% (*v*/*w*) of (4) RI11, (5) RS5 or (6) UL4 postbiotics.  The basal diets were formulated using FeedLIVE software Version 1.52 (Live Informatics Company Ltd., Nonthaburi, Thailand) \[[@B43-animals-10-00982]\] following the nutrient specifications of the Cobb 500 Nutrition Guide.  From day 22 to day 42, broilers were subjected to a high temperature for 3 h per day from 11:00 am to 2:00 pm at 36 ± 1 °C.  It took approximately 45 min for the temperature to escalate from 24 to 36 °C.  Nonetheless, it took 1 h and 30 min for the temperature to decline from 36 to 24 °C.  The management and environmental conditions of this current experiment are described in our recently published companion study \[[@B43-animals-10-00982]\]. 

2.3.  Samples Collection {#sec2dot3-animals-10-00982}
-----------------------

At 42 days of age, around 2 h and 45 min after the daily heat stress, 2 chickens from each cage (14 chickens per treatment group) were selected at random and slaughtered following the Halal practice, as recommended by the Malaysian Standard \[[@B51-animals-10-00982]\].  Blood was collected at exsanguination into BD Vacutainer^®^ EDTA blood tubes (New Jersey, BD, USA) and kept on ice.  Upon centrifugation at 3500× *g* for 15 min at 4 °C, harvested plasma samples were (1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes) stored at −80 °C for later determination of total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione (GSH), corticosterone (CORT), ceruloplasmin (CPN), alpha 1-acid glycoprotein (α1-AGP), heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) and lipid profiles.  Whole breast muscle was collected for the meat quality determination.  The thigh muscle was collected for lipid peroxidation measurement. 

2.4.  Plasma Antioxidant Enzymes Biomarkers {#sec2dot4-animals-10-00982}
------------------------------------------

### 2.4.1.  Total Antioxidant Capacity {#sec2dot4dot1-animals-10-00982}

Total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC) was measured by a colourimetric method (ABTS) using a commercial total antioxidant capacity assay kit (Elabscience, E-BC-K219, Houston, TX, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol.  The principle of this method, to determine the T-AOC from plasma, is that ABTS is oxidised to green ABTS^+^ by appropriate oxidant, which can be inhibited in the presence of antioxidants.  Briefly, 10 μL of plasma sample was loaded into a microplate well and mixed with 20 μL of application solution.  Then, 170 μL of ABTS working solution was added into each well, and incubated at room temperature for 6 min.  Finally, the absorbance of the colour was measured at 405 nm by a microplate reader (Multiskan GO, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).  Blank contains distilled water plus application and working solutions were abstracted from samples and standard absorbance.  The trolox solution was diluted with distilled water to prepare serial concentration (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.0 mM) and the standard curve was plotted to determine T-AOC concentration in plasma. 

### 2.4.2.  Superoxide Dismutase Activity {#sec2dot4dot2-animals-10-00982}

Superoxide dismutase (SOD) assays were carried out using EnzyChrom™ Superoxide Dismutase Assay Kit (ESOD-100, BioAssay Systems, Hayward, CA, USA) based on the protocol provided by the manufacturer.  The detection range of the kit was 0.05--3 U/mL SOD.  The test depended on the addition of xanthine oxidase to the sample as a source of superoxide, and this superoxide reacted with a specific dye to form a coloured product.  Based on the activity of SOD in the sample, which acted as a superoxide scavenger, the superoxide was reduced, and then the intensity of colour was decreased.  The activity of SOD was determined by measuring the colour intensity at 440 nm using a Multiskan GO microplate reader (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).  The concentration of SOD in the sample was quantified using standard curve of known concentration of SOD. 

### 2.4.3.  Catalase Activity {#sec2dot4dot3-animals-10-00982}

Catalase (CAT) activity was measured from plasma using the EnzyChrom^TM^ catalase assay kit (ECAT-100, BioAssay Systems, Hayward, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions.  The detection range of the kit was 0.2--5 U/L CAT.  The test depends on the degradation of H~2~O~2~ using redox dye.  After the preparation of the assay, 10 µL of the sample, positive control and assay buffer as blank plus 90 µL of substrate buffer (50 µM) were loaded into the micro-plate well, then the plate was shaken and incubated at room temperature for 30 min.  During the incubation time, the standard curve was prepared by mixing 40 µL of the 4.8 mM H~2~O~2~ reagent with 440 µL of distilled water in the serial concentration, then 10 µL of the standard solution with 90 µL of assay buffer were placed into standard wells.  After incubation, 100 µL of detection reagent was combined in each well and incubated for 10 min at room temperature.  Finally, the optical density of CAT was read at 570 nm using a microplate reader (Multiskan GO, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).  The standard curve was used to calculate the CAT activity in the plasma samples

### 2.4.4.  Glutathione Peroxidase Activity {#sec2dot4dot4-animals-10-00982}

Glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity was analysed in plasma samples using the EnzyChrom^TM^ Glutathione Peroxidase Assay Kit (EGPx-100, BioAssay Systems, Hayward, CA, USA), which directly measures the consumption of NADPH in the enzyme-coupled reactions.  The assay was carried out as recommended in the manufacturer's protocol.  The detection range of the kit was 40--800 U/L GPx.  Approximately, 10 µL of the sample plus 90 µL of working reagent (80 µL assay buffer, 5 µL glutathione, 3 µL NADPH (35 mM), and 2 µL gr enzyme) were loaded into the microplate well and the plate was tapped to mix.  Next, 100 µL of substrate solution was added to each sample and control well.  The optical density of the samples and standards were measured immediately at time zero (OD0), and again at 4 min (OD4).  The absorbance of the GPx activity was recorded at 340 nm using a microplate reader (Multiskan GO, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).  The NADPH standards were used to plot the standard curve.  The standard curve was used to calculate the GPx activity in the plasma samples. 

### 2.4.5.  Glutathione Activity {#sec2dot4dot5-animals-10-00982}

Glutathione (GSH) activity was measured in plasma using QuantiChrom^TM^ Glutathione Assay Kit (DIGT-250, BioAssay Systems, Hayward, CA, USA) following the manufacturer's protocol.  The principle of the assay depended on the reaction of 5,5'-dithiobis-2-nitrobenzoic acid with reduced glutathione to form a yellow product.  Briefly, 120 µL of 20-fold diluted sample was mixed with 120 µL of reagent A into 1.5 mL tube, centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 5 min and 200 µL of supernatant was transferred into the microplate well.  Then, 100 µL of reagent B was added to each well of samples, the plate was tapped for mixing, and incubated for 25 min at room temperature.  Next, 400 µL of the calibrator was mixed in serial dilution with distilled water into separate wells as the standard and 300 µL of distilled water was pipetted into a separate well as a blank.  After incubation, the absorbance was read at 412 nm using a microplate reader (Multiskan GO, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).  The GSH concentration in the plasma was calculated using the standard curve of glutathione. 

2.5.  Plasma Lipid Profile {#sec2dot5-animals-10-00982}
-------------------------

Plasma total cholesterol (TCHOL), high density lipoprotein (HDL) and triglyceride (TG) were analysed using an automatic analyser 902 (Hitachi, Munich, Germany), while low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) levels were estimated with the protocol described by DeLong et al.  \[[@B52-animals-10-00982]\].  The level of VLDL was calculated by dividing plasma TG by five.  The LDL level was obtained using the following equation:

2.6.  Lipid Peroxidation {#sec2dot6-animals-10-00982}
-----------------------

Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) in the thigh meat were measured with the method described by Lynch and Frei \[[@B53-animals-10-00982]\] and modified by Mercier et al.  \[[@B54-animals-10-00982]\].  About 1 g of meat sample was homogenised in 4 mL 0.15 M KCl + 0.1 mM BHT for 1 min at 6000 rpm with Ultraturrax homogenizer.  Two hundred microliters of the homogenised sample was mixed with a solution (TBARS solution), heated in a water bath set at 95 °C for 1 h, for a pink colour to develop.  The formation of a pink coloured sample mixture is the result of the reaction of TBARS end products (malondialdehyde) with thiobarbituric acid (TBA).  The following step was the cooling of the sample under tap water for 5 min.  Three millilitres of n-butyl alcohol was then added to the extracts and homogenised.  The next step was the centrifugation of the mixture for 10 min at 5000 rpm.  The absorbance of the supernatant was read with a spectrophotometer (Secomam, Domont, France) at 532 nm wavelengths against n-butyl alcohol as a blank.  TBARS concentration of samples was determined from a standard curve of 1, 1,3,3-tetraethoxypropane and calculated as µg malondialdehyde (MDA)/g meat. 

2.7.  Plasma Corticosterone {#sec2dot7-animals-10-00982}
--------------------------

The corticosterone (CORT) plasma concentration was measured using a CORT ELISA kit specific to chickens (QAYEE-BIO, Shanghai, China) in accordance with the instructions of the manufacturer.  Fifty microliters of appropriately diluted samples and standard were loaded in duplicate into predetermined microplate wells, mixed with 50 μL of horseradish peroxidase solution, gently shaken and incubated at 37 °C for 60 min.  Then, the contents of the wells were discarded and washed using washing solution.  The last step was repeated five times.  Then, 50 μL of chromogen solution A and 50 μL of chromogen solution B (of each) were pipetted into each well and incubated for 10 min at 37 °C while protected from light.  After the incubation, 50 μL of a stop solution was pipetted into each well and the absorbance was immediately measured using a BioTek™ ELx800™ microplate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA) at 450 nm.  A standard diluent (without horseradish peroxidase (HRP) or sample) was used as a blank, which was later subtracted from the absorbance of standards and samples.  CORT concentration in plasma was calculated using an equation generated from the slope of the standard curve. 

2.8.  Heat Shock Protein 70 (HSP70) {#sec2dot8-animals-10-00982}
----------------------------------

The heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) plasma concentration was measured using chicken HSP70 ELISA kits (QAYEE-BIO, Shanghai, China) based on the manufacturer's instructions.  Except for the differences in assay standard, the principle, materials and steps used in this assay were similar to those described for plasma corticosterone determination ([Section 2.7](#sec2dot7-animals-10-00982){ref-type="sec"}).  HSP70 concentration in plasma was calculated using an equation generated from the slope of the standard curve. 

2.9.  Plasma Acute Phase Proteins {#sec2dot9-animals-10-00982}
--------------------------------

### 2.9.1.  α1-Acid Glycoprotein (α1-AGP) {#sec2dot9dot1-animals-10-00982}

The α1-AGP plasma concentration was measured using a commercial ELISA kit specific to chicken (QAYEE-BIO, Shanghai, China) following the manufacturer's protocol.  Except for the differences in assay standard, the principle, materials and steps used in this assay were similar to those described for plasma corticosterone determination ([Section 2.7](#sec2dot7-animals-10-00982){ref-type="sec"}).  α1-AGP concentration in plasma was calculated using an equation generated from the slope of the standard curve. 

### 2.9.2.  Ceruloplasmin (CPN) {#sec2dot9dot2-animals-10-00982}

The ceruloplasmin (CPN) concentration was determined by the method of Martinez-Subiela et al.  \[[@B55-animals-10-00982]\].  The method used in this work was based on the rate of coloured product development from CPN and the substrate 1,4-phenylenediamine-dihydrochloride.  Approximately, 8.15 g of sodium acetate trihydrate was dissolved in 100 mL distilled water and the pH of the solution was adjusted to 6.2 with glacial acetic acid.  Then, 0.246 g of 1,4-phenylenediamine-dihydrochloride (Sigma Chemical, P1519) was added to the prepared buffer and kept in the dark for a minimum of 45 min.  A 100 μL of the working solution and 10 μL of samples or standards were loaded into appropriate microplate wells, gently shaken and kept in the dark for 20 minutes.  The ceruloplasmin oxidase activity was measured at 550 nm using a microplate reader (Multiskan GO, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).  A standard curve was carried out with serial dilution of pig plasma of known CPN concentration, calibrated against a combination of purified CPN (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and saline buffer to obtain different concentrations of 12.75 (20 μL pig plasma + 60 μL saline buffer), 6.375, 3.187, 1.593, 0.796, 0.398, 0.199, and 0.099 mg/mL CPN.  A blank, containing phenylenediamine dihydrochloride solution and distilled water absorbance, was identified and subtracted from the samples and standard absorbance. 

2.10.  Meat Quality {#sec2dot10-animals-10-00982}
------------------

### 2.10.1.  Drip Loss {#sec2dot10dot1-animals-10-00982}

Drip loss of the meat samples was evaluated using the method described by Honikel \[[@B56-animals-10-00982]\].  After slaughtering, approximately 25--35 g of fresh meat samples from *pectoralis major* muscle was collected, individually weighed and recorded as the initial weight (W1).  Polyethene plastics bags used to pack each sample were sealed and the vacuum packages were stored at 4 °C in the chiller.  Then, at 7 days post-storage, the final weight (W2) was measured immediately after removing the samples from the bags and blotted dry.  The calculation of the percentage drip loss was done by differences in the final and initial weight of the sample.  The sample weight was divided by the initial sample weight after 7 days of storage using the following equation:$${{Drip}~{loss}~\%} = \left( \frac{W1 - W2}{W1} \right) \times 100$$ W1 = initial sample weight on day 0; W2 = final sample weight after 7 days of storage. 

### 2.10.2.  Cooking Loss {#sec2dot10dot2-animals-10-00982}

Cooking losses of the meat samples were obtained according to Honikel \[[@B56-animals-10-00982]\].  Fresh meat samples from *pectoralis major* muscle were weighed individually and recorded as the initial weight (W1).  Samples were then cooked in a water bath at 80 °C for 20 min in plastic bags.  Following that, the samples were cooled at room temperature and blotted gently and reweighed as a final weight (W2).  Cooking loss percentage was quantified as the initial and the final weight difference using the following equation:$${{Cooking}~{loss}~\%} = \left( \frac{W1 - W2}{W1} \right) \times 100$$ where W1 = weight before cooking; W2 = weight after cooking. 

### 2.10.3.  Shear Force (Tenderness) {#sec2dot10dot3-animals-10-00982}

The shear force of the meat sample was determined with the protocol according to Sazili et al.  \[[@B57-animals-10-00982]\].  Upon the determination of cooking loss, the same meat samples proceeded to a shear force determination using a TA.HD plus^®^ texture analyser (Stable Micro Systems, Surrey, UK) having a Volodkevitch bite jaw equipment.  Meat samples length were cut in parallel to the direction of the muscle fibres from each sample in triplicate blocks, each of them measuring 1 cm (height) × 1 cm (width) × 2 cm (length).  Each block was sheared with the Volodkevitch bite jaw on the middle of the block, perpendicular to the direction of the fibres.  Tenderness of meat is inversely comparable to the shear force values.  Shear force values were expressed as the average peak positive force value of triplicate blocks from each individual meat sample, and the results were expressed in grams. 

### 2.10.4.  Colour {#sec2dot10dot4-animals-10-00982}

A ColorFlex EZ spectrophotometer (Hunter Associates Laboratory, Inc., Reston, VA, USA) was used for meat colour determination following the International Commission on Illumination (CIE) Lab-values.  Before using it, the colourimeter was calibrated against black and white tiles.  The frozen meat samples were thawed overnight into a 4 °C chiller.  The thawed meat samples were subjected to blooming for 30 min and transferred into the ColorFlex sample cup with the bloomed meat surface facing the base of the cup.  Meat colour was measured in triplicate (the cup was rotated clockwise to 90° in the second and third reading) and to obtain the average values of lightness (L\*), redness (a\*) and yellowness (b\*) readings \[[@B58-animals-10-00982]\]. 

### 2.10.5.  Meat pH {#sec2dot10dot5-animals-10-00982}

The breast muscle samples stored at −80 °C were removed and pulverised using a mortar and pestle with presence of liquid nitrogen.  Half a gram of each sample was homogenised (Wiggen Hauser^®^ D-500, Berlin, Germany) for 30 seconds in 10 mL ice cold 5 mM sodium iodoacetate (Merck Schuchardt OHG, Hohenbrunn, Germany), and 150 mM KCl solution for 20 seconds to stop glycolysis process (specifically glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase) and its subsequent lactic acid production \[[@B58-animals-10-00982]\].  A pre-calibrated pH meter (Mettler-Toledo AG, Zürich, Switzerland) was used for the measurement of pH and calibration was done prior to usage using pH 4.0 and 7.0 buffers. 

2.11.  Statistical Analysis {#sec2dot11-animals-10-00982}
--------------------------

All statistical analyses were analysed using the 9.4 Version of Statistical Analysis System (SAS) software (SAS Inc., Cary, NC, USA).  All data were analysed as 1-way ANOVA using the general linear model procedure.  The analysis involved diet as the main effect in a completely randomised design.  Where appropriate, means were separated by Duncan's multiple range test.  The statistical significance was considered at *p* \< 0.05. 

3.  Results {#sec3-animals-10-00982}
==========

3.1.  Antioxidant Enzyme Activities {#sec3dot1-animals-10-00982}
----------------------------------

The SOD and GPx activities did not differ (*p* \> 0.05) among treatment groups ([Table 1](#animals-10-00982-t001){ref-type="table"}).  The CAT activity was significantly (*p* \< 0.05) enhanced in the RI11 group compared to NC and PC groups.  The GSH activity was also significantly (*p* \< 0.05) higher in UL4 and RI11 groups compared to NC and PC groups.  Birds fed with the RI11 diet had significantly (*p* \< 0.05) higher T-AOC activity than their counterparts fed with PC, NC and UL4 diets.  The broilers fed with RS5 diet had higher (*p* \< 0.05) T-AOC than broilers fed with NC diet. 

3.2.  Acute Phase Proteins (APPs) and Heat Shock Protein 70 (HSP70) {#sec3dot2-animals-10-00982}
------------------------------------------------------------------

The impacts of feeding different postbiotics on APPs (α1-AGP and CPN) and HSP70 in broiler chickens under heat stress conditions are summarised in [Figure 1](#animals-10-00982-f001){ref-type="fig"}.  CPN concentration was significantly (*p* \< 0.05) lower in birds fed RI11 diet as compared to the birds fed NC, PC and AA diets.  However, difference in CPN was neither observed between the NC and PC groups nor between AA, UL4 and RS5 groups.  The RI11 group recorded the lowest α1-AGP concentration compared to other groups.  The UL4 group also had significantly lower α1-AGP plasma concentration compared to the NC group.  HSP70 concentration was not affected by dietary treatment (*p* \> 0.05). 

3.3.  Plasma Corticosterone {#sec3dot3-animals-10-00982}
--------------------------

The plasma corticosterone level was not affected (*p* \> 0.05) by dietary treatment ([Figure 2](#animals-10-00982-f002){ref-type="fig"}). 

3.4.  Plasma Lipid Profile {#sec3dot4-animals-10-00982}
-------------------------

Feeding broilers with RI11 diet resulted in lower (*p* \< 0.05) total cholesterol as compared with broilers fed NC, PC or AA diets, but not different (*p* \> 0.05) when compared with other postbiotic groups ([Table 2](#animals-10-00982-t002){ref-type="table"}).  No differences (*p* \> 0.05) were noted for the cholesterol level between PC, UL4, RS5 and AA groups or between NC and PC treatment groups.  Triglyceride and VLDL were lower (*p* \< 0.05) in postbiotic groups compared with NC, but not different *(p* \> 0.05) from PC and AA treatment groups.  The triglyceride and VLDL concentrations were not different (*p* \> 0.05) in broilers fed AA, PC and NC diets.  The LDL level was lower (*p* \< 0.05) in birds fed with the postbiotics and AA diets compared with birds that received the PC and NC diets.  No differences (*p* \> 0.05) were observed between NC and PC groups for LDL concentration.  Dietary treatment had no effect (*p* \> 0.05) on HDL concentration. 

3.5.  Meat Quality (pH, Drip Loss, Cooking Loss, Shear Force and Colour) and Lipid Peroxidation (TBARS) {#sec3dot5-animals-10-00982}
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Table 3](#animals-10-00982-t003){ref-type="table"} shows the effects of different postbiotics supplementation on pH, drip loss, cooking loss, shear force and colour of *pectorals major* muscle from heat-stressed broiler chickens.  The pH was significantly higher in the RI11 group as compared with RS5, NC and PC treatment groups, whereas the pH in RS5 group was not different (*p* \> 0.05) compared with those of the UL4 and AA groups.  The latter treatment groups were higher (*p* \< 0.05) in breast meat pH than NC and PC groups.  RI11 and UL4 groups had lower (*p* \< 0.05) meat drip loss as compared with the meat from the NC treatment group.  The drip loss in the meat from heat-stressed broiler chickens was not different between PC, AA, RI11, UL4 and RS5 treatment groups.  The cooking losses from RI11 and RS5 postbiotics groups were significantly lower compared to the AA, PC and NC treatment groups.  However, there were no significant differences between the latter groups in the cooking loss.  Shearing force of *pectoralis major* muscle of heat-stressed broiler chickens was higher (*p* \< 0.05) in the NC group compared to AA, RI11, RS5 and UL4 treatment groups.  No differences (*p* \> 0.05) were recorded for the share force among PC, AA, RI11, UL4 and RS5 treatment groups or between the NC and PC treatment groups. 

Birds fed RI11, UL4 and AA diets had lower (*p* \< 0.05) lightness values compared to PC and NC treatment groups.  No significant differences were observed for lightness among birds fed on AA, RI11 and UL4 diets or between birds fed RS5, NC and PC diets.  The meat yellowness was higher (*p* \< 0.05) in the NC, PC and AA treatment groups compared to the RI11 postbiotics group.  No differences were observed for redness among all the treatment groups. 

For the lipid peroxidation), there were significant reductions (*p* \< 0.05) in thigh MDA content of RI11 and UL4 treatment groups compared to PC, NC and AA treatment groups.  No differences were observed for MDA in between PC and AA treatment groups.  The MDA content of the RS5 group was not different from PC and AA treatment groups. 

4.  Discussion {#sec4-animals-10-00982}
=============

4.1.  Antioxidant Activities and Lipid Peroxidation {#sec4dot1-animals-10-00982}
--------------------------------------------------

Heats stress increases core body temperature, which triggers an increment in the production of free radicals leading to oxidative damage \[[@B59-animals-10-00982],[@B60-animals-10-00982]\].  Oxidative stress leads to the production of varieties of ROS, including hydroxyl free radical and superoxide anions.  Several studies showed that overflow of ROS could damage the biological macromolecules such as proteins and nucleic acids, and produce huge amounts of MDA causing tissue damage, consequently leading to the development of diseases \[[@B61-animals-10-00982]\].  In birds, the main antioxidant enzymes are glutathione peroxidase (GPx), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and glutathione (GSH).  These enzymes are a higher order of antioxidant defence acting to transform reactive species into non-radical and non-toxic products \[[@B62-animals-10-00982],[@B63-animals-10-00982]\]. 

Postbiotic supplementation in the present study did not affect the SOD and GPx activities.  However, the CAT and GSH activities were enhanced in the postbiotic groups, especially in RI11 and UL4 birds as compared with the negative control and other treatment groups.  Likewise, two studies reported that broilers under heat challenge had increased activities of CAT, GPx, GSH and SOD \[[@B60-animals-10-00982],[@B64-animals-10-00982]\].  Heat-stressed birds fed with postbiotics also had significantly higher T-AOC in the present study.  The present study results were in line with the findings of Wang et al.  \[[@B65-animals-10-00982]\] who found that broilers fed probiotic *Lactobacillus johnsonii* BS15 had significantly higher blood T-AOC, SOD and CAT activities compared to a negative control group.  Hence, the dietary postbiotics showed the capacity to improve antioxidant activities (concentrations of CAT, GSH and T-AOC) in the plasma of heat-stressed broilers.  Postbiotics are a natural source of antimicrobial and antioxidant that can safely alleviate the stress and improve the health of animals.  This finding is consistent with Akbarian et al.  \[[@B66-animals-10-00982]\], who observed dietary supplementation with another natural source of antioxidant (*Xanthorrhiza* and *Origanum compactum*) in heat-stressed broilers, which led to increased mRNA levels of SOD, GPx, and CAT, in the hepatic system.  As postbiotics possess probiotic characteristics \[[@B34-animals-10-00982],[@B39-animals-10-00982],[@B40-animals-10-00982],[@B43-animals-10-00982],[@B67-animals-10-00982],[@B68-animals-10-00982]\], probiotic studies can provide useful information to understand how postbiotics could improve the antioxidant capability and develop the oxidative resistance in the body under heat stress.  Several studies reported that the supplementation of probiotics in poultry diets reduced the adverse effects of oxidative stress and enhanced the activity of antioxidant enzymes \[[@B61-animals-10-00982],[@B69-animals-10-00982]\], which might reduce cell damage by inhibiting the production of ROS and finally improving the health of animals \[[@B70-animals-10-00982],[@B71-animals-10-00982]\].  Our results were consistent with Shen et al.  \[[@B72-animals-10-00982]\] who reported that blood antioxidant capacities were significantly intensified by the incorporation of probiotic *L. plantarum* in the diets and promoted growth performance in broilers. 

This study is the first attempt to provide data on the effect of postbiotics on antioxidant activities in heat-stressed broilers.  However, probiotics have been reported for their ROS removal capacity and promoting broiler health under normal \[[@B61-animals-10-00982]\] and high-temperature conditions \[[@B73-animals-10-00982]\]. 

Generally, broiler chickens are characterised by their high lipid contents which increase the exposure to lipid peroxidation, which could harm the body due to ROS production to maintain nutritional and physiological demands.  Lipid peroxidation is a sequela of reduced antioxidant protection as the production of free radicals and ROS increases.  The MDA level is often used as an endogenous reflection of lipid peroxidation \[[@B74-animals-10-00982]\]. 

Antioxidant enzymes such as CAT, GPx, GSH and SOD are vital in scavenging excess ROS at the cellular level, thereby affecting the stability of lipid peroxidation of broiler meat during storage \[[@B75-animals-10-00982]\].  In this study, there was a significant reduction in MDA content in broilers fed RI11 and UL4 under heat stress compared to negative control and other groups.  The postbiotics herein showed probiotic antioxidant benefits and could promote the function of CAT and other antioxidant enzymes.  This may be associated to the postbiotic ability to confer effective antioxidant protection in reducing lipid peroxidation during the growth phase of the birds, despite being under heat challenge. 

4.2.  Acute Phase Proteins, HSP70 and Corticosterone {#sec4dot2-animals-10-00982}
---------------------------------------------------

APPs are blood proteins majorly produced in the hepatic system and their concentrations change under conditions such as inflammatory reactions, infections, and tissue injuries \[[@B4-animals-10-00982]\].  APPs also function to restore homeostasis and prevent microbial proliferation following stimulation by non-specific innate immune cells \[[@B76-animals-10-00982]\].  In this study, the CPN and α1-AGP concentrations were significantly reduced in the heat-stressed birds fed either with postbiotics (RI11, RS5, UL4) or ascorbic acid (AA) compared to the negative control.  These findings indicate the beneficial role of the postbiotics (especially RI11) in improving immune response so as to annul the negative effect of heat stress on the broiler chickens.  The capacity of ascorbic acid to produce such a beneficial effect was also illustrated, though the concentrations of the APPs were still higher compared with the RI11 fed birds. 

Various authors have reported different response kinetics of APPs in avian species.  APPs such as AGP were shown to be faster reacting than CPN upon exogenous administration of corticosterone \[[@B77-animals-10-00982]\].  In contrast, corticosterone was markedly elevated after 2 h of feed deprivation compared to AGP and CPN which showed similar response only after 30 h \[[@B4-animals-10-00982]\].  Such discrepancies suggest species differences in either stress exposure or capacity for APPs synthesis. 

In this study, despite the lower corticosterone level in broilers fed with postbiotics as compared to the NC, the effect was not significant.  Changes in corticosterone levels could be influenced by the duration of heat exposure, and the benefits of postbiotic supplementation might be masked during chronic heat stress.  As reported by Sohail et al.  \[[@B78-animals-10-00982]\], broilers supplemented with prebiotic and probiotic mixture recorded lower serum corticosterone concentrations on day 21 following heat exposure compared with the negative control group. 

Another important plasma protein is HSP70, as their levels increase during cellular insult, which is useful in predicting the degree of thermal stress in broilers \[[@B77-animals-10-00982]\].  HSP70 is a type of heat shock protein that is highly conserved and promptly synthesised in response to stressors such as feed restriction, crating, transportation, unpleasant human contact, and elevated temperature \[[@B77-animals-10-00982],[@B79-animals-10-00982],[@B80-animals-10-00982],[@B81-animals-10-00982]\]. 

In this study, the HSP70 level was not significantly different between the heat-stressed broilers supplemented with postbiotics, antibiotics, ascorbic acid, and the negative control.  HSP70 acts as a chaperone through interaction between proteins to defend synthesised proteins against additional injury \[[@B82-animals-10-00982]\].  Hence, HSP70 induction guards against stresses such as hyperthermia, ischemia, and inflammation.  For instance, HSP70 levels increased significantly in broilers exposed to heat stress \[[@B4-animals-10-00982],[@B80-animals-10-00982]\].  Broilers restricted from feeding had significantly lower HSP70 and *S. enteritidis* colonization compared with the control group after heat exposure \[[@B83-animals-10-00982]\].  Ascorbic acid also induced increased body temperature in heat-stressed chickens, which correlated with the HSP70 response \[[@B1-animals-10-00982]\].  Another study reported that the concentration of HSP70 decreased after exposure the birds to long-term heat stress and this could be that the birds developed tolerance to heat after long heat stress, or due to material insufficiency after long-term stressing \[[@B84-animals-10-00982],[@B85-animals-10-00982]\].  These results are inconsistent with the present study, as we observed no difference in HSP70 response following postbiotic and ascorbic acid supplementation.  However, the expression of HSP70 could be influenced by various factors including the type of target organ and age of the birds \[[@B86-animals-10-00982]\].  Yan et al.  \[[@B87-animals-10-00982]\] showed that HSP70 induction is organ dependent following the induction of the protein in heat-stressed chickens.  Differences in the management system, breeds, and the degree of thermal stress could explain the inconsistent result between the present study and other related studies. 

4.3.  Plasma Lipid Profile {#sec4dot3-animals-10-00982}
-------------------------

The birds supplemented with various types of postbiotics had lower total cholesterol and triglyceride levels.  Nevertheless, the effect of total cholesterol in the former groups was not different compared with AA fed birds.  The present result is in agreement with that of \[[@B25-animals-10-00982]\] who found decreased cholesterol levels following supplementation with various combinations of postbiotics.  Kareem \[[@B88-animals-10-00982]\] reported that supplementation of postbiotics and inulin in broiler diets decreased serum cholesterol, triglyceride and LDL compared with the antibiotic and negative control group.  Similar results were found in the reduction of cholesterol profile in plasma of laying hens \[[@B34-animals-10-00982]\], post-weaning rats \[[@B50-animals-10-00982]\] and piglets \[[@B89-animals-10-00982]\] fed postbiotics produced from *L. plantarum*. 

Our result corroborated that of \[[@B35-animals-10-00982]\], where plasma cholesterol concentration was reduced in egg yolk following dietary feeding with postbiotics. * L. plantarum* metabolites have been reported to have a cholesterol-lowering effect in rats \[[@B49-animals-10-00982]\].  This could be related to the increase in the population of LAB, as found in this study.  Through conjugation, the primary bile acids are transformed into secondary products by the intrinsic ability of LAB.  Therefore, the volume of bile acid in the intestine is reduced.  Another likely pathway for the effect observed in this study is the enhancement of both faecal excretion and turnover of bile acids \[[@B49-animals-10-00982]\]. 

Cholesterol is a precursor for bile acid synthesis, which explains the reason for the higher rate of cholesterol break down \[[@B90-animals-10-00982]\].  Postbiotics used in this study could increase the population of lactic acid bacteria, production of enzymes disintegrating bile salts and de-conjugating them in the gut, as well as reduction of the gut pH that can be efficient in decreasing the cholesterol of blood by reducing non-conjugate bile acids solvability at low pH, leading to less absorption from the intestine and more excretion in the faeces \[[@B88-animals-10-00982]\].  Other authors have demonstrated that cholesterol levels can be reduced when cholesterol is incorporated into the bacterial cellular membrane \[[@B91-animals-10-00982]\].  In the present study, postbiotics, especially RI11 supplemented in broiler diets under heat stress, showed the same trend of previous studies in terms of reducing plasma cholesterol profile levels. 

4.4.  Meat Quality {#sec4dot4-animals-10-00982}
-----------------

Aside from the health implications, the quality of the meat obtained from the chicken muscle is crucial in the economics of meat processing industries.  The water holding capacity (WHC) of meat is indicated by the drip and cooking losses, while the latter determines profit in meat sales \[[@B92-animals-10-00982]\]. 

In this study, the higher drip losses in the meat of heat-stressed broilers fed only a basal diet are comparable to earlier works reporting the adverse effect of exposure of broilers to heat stress on meat quality.  Both acute and chronic heat stress exposure could negatively affect meat quality \[[@B93-animals-10-00982],[@B94-animals-10-00982]\].  The former occurs by alteration in aerobic metabolism, glycolysis, and intramuscular deposition of fat, thus leading to pale meat colour, reduced WHC, and higher shear force \[[@B95-animals-10-00982],[@B96-animals-10-00982]\].  Acute heat stress induces changes in blood acid-base status and integrity of muscle membrane \[[@B97-animals-10-00982]\].  Findings from the present study showed broilers fed with postbiotics had significantly lower drip loss and cooking loss than the NC, OTC and AA fed groups.  This is consistent with other studies conducted using postbiotics and probiotics.  Although the experiments were conducted under normal ambient temperature, broilers fed combinations of postbiotics and inulin had lower drip loss as compared with control groups \[[@B31-animals-10-00982]\].  Additionally, dietary probiotics resulted in significant reductions in drip loss in the breast muscle of chickens \[[@B98-animals-10-00982]\]. 

Ali \[[@B99-animals-10-00982]\] also observed no significant change in shear force in breast muscle of broilers fed with or without probiotics.  Shearing force in the present study was higher (*p* \< 0.05) in the antibiotic and NC birds as compared with those fed various postbiotics.  This might be due to the capacity of the postbiotics to annul the effect of thermal stress in the broilers as it relates to antioxidant enzyme activities.  Similar findings were reported in one study based on the lower shear force in the birds fed probiotics \[[@B98-animals-10-00982]\].  Another study reported that the meat pH, colour, drip loss, cooking loss and tenderness were improved by feeding probiotics which induced the differential expression of carbohydrate metabolism, cytoskeleton, chaperone and transportation proteins.  These proteins participate in carbohydrate and energy metabolism as well as tight junction pathways, suggesting roles in the organization of meat quality improvement \[[@B100-animals-10-00982]\].  The same previous study documented that the improvement in the meat quality traits in the broilers fed probiotic *Enterococcus faecium* may be attributed to the up-regulation of the protein's related substrate metabolism, antioxidant and immune systems which lead to alterations of the pentose phosphate and citric acid pathways and increase the metabolism of amino acids and improve antioxidant and immune capacity leading to improved muscle biochemical indexes (pH, colour, WHC and texture).  The postbiotic inclusion in the broiler diets under heat stress is expected to deliver the same action of probiotics on the meat quality, as mentioned. 

Another indicator of meat quality is its pH \[[@B101-animals-10-00982]\].  The pH value of 6.0 is considered good for broiler breast meat \[[@B101-animals-10-00982]\].  The pH of the breast meat of all the treatment groups ranged from 5.7--6.0, thus signifying good quality.  The pH of the birds fed with postbiotics (RI11, RS5, UL4) was higher (*p* \< 0.05) compared with the PC and NC groups.  This is another indication of the role of the postbiotics administered to the heat-stressed birds in maintaining the meat quality.  Our observation is different in comparison to the study where dietary supplementation with postbiotics and inulin resulted in significantly lower pH in broiler meat \[[@B31-animals-10-00982]\].  The fact that the birds in this study were under heat challenge could explain the disparity between our results and the previous study.  Nevertheless, since the final pH of the breast meat was within the normal range, the difference offers no significant impact. 

Meat colour as an indicator of broiler meat quality was also examined in the present study.  Broilers fed postbiotics (UL4, RI11 and RS5) and ascorbic acid (AA) had significantly lower lightness values compared to the negative control and antibiotic group, while birds fed RI11 had the lowest lightness level.  Lightness is used as a scale of breast muscle colour \[[@B102-animals-10-00982]\].  Myoglobin in the meat is responsible for absorbing green light, leading to the more yellowish and less reddish appearance of meat \[[@B103-animals-10-00982]\].  Therefore, the lower lightness in the treated broiler chickens could be attributed to the higher pH of the muscle \[[@B104-animals-10-00982]\].  Such colour changes were reported in previous studies following probiotics feeding \[[@B99-animals-10-00982],[@B104-animals-10-00982],[@B105-animals-10-00982]\].  Additionally, the redness level was not significantly different between the treatment groups in the present study, which is consistent with the results of \[[@B106-animals-10-00982]\].  However, \[[@B31-animals-10-00982]\] reported changes in redness level in breast meat after combined feeding of postbiotics and inulin. 

Based on the review by \[[@B97-animals-10-00982]\], we suggest there are three main pathways through which postbiotics exert their action in annulling the adverse effects of heat stress on meat quality in broiler chickens.  First, is the prevention of a rapid drop in pH which could be detrimental to meat quality.  Low pH has been associated with low redness, high drip and cooking losses in breast meat of chickens \[[@B107-animals-10-00982],[@B108-animals-10-00982],[@B109-animals-10-00982]\].  Second, the enhancement of antioxidant activities of GPx, SOD, and catalase, is vital to alleviate the effect of heat stress on meat quality through oxidative damages.  The third likely mechanism is lowering the corticoid hormone levels (secretion of corticosterone).  Sato et al.  \[[@B110-animals-10-00982]\] reported that corticosterone accelerates ROS production, this could result in pale and high drip loss of broiler meat. 

5.  Conclusions {#sec5-animals-10-00982}
==============

The findings of the current study presented that feeding postbiotics, especially RI11, enhanced the antioxidant activities, meat quality (pH, WHC, colour and tenderness) and reduced acute phase proteins (AGP and CPN), plasma cholesterol and lipid peroxidation in broiler chickens exposed to heat stress conditions.  Hence, postbiotics can be used as antioxidant agents in production of poultry under hot weather conditions. 

The authors are gratified by the support and conferment of the Higher Institution Centre of Excellence (HICoE) research grant from the Ministry of Education, Malaysia.  We are thankful to Tanbir Ahmad, Salah Noory Mohamed and Mohamed Idris Ali Alshelmani for their advice and assistance during farm work, sampling and laboratory analysis. 

Conceptualization, A.M.H., T.C.L. and H.L.F.; methodology, A.M.H. and W.I.I.; software A.M.H. and E.A.A.; validation, T.C.L. and H.L.F.; formal analysis, A.M.H., W.I.I. and E.A.A.; investigation, T.C.L., H.L.F., A.M.H., W.I.I. and E.A.A.; resources, T.C.L., H.L.F., Z.I., A.A.S. and N.M.M., data curation, A.M.H.; writing---original draft preparation, A.M.H. and W.I.I.; writing---review and editing T.C.L., E.A.A., H.L.F. and A.A.S.; visualization, A.M.H., T.C.L. and H.L.F.; supervision, T.C.L., H.L.F., A.A.S., N.M.M., and Z.I.; project administration, A.M.H., and T.C.L.; funding acquisition, T.C.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. 

The funding for this study was obtained from the Higher Institution Centre of Excellence (HICoE) research grant under the Ministry of Education, Malaysia (HICoE-ITAFoS/2017). 

The authors declare no conflict of interest. 

![ Effect of feeding different postbiotics on plasma acute phase proteins (α1-AGP and CPN), and HSP70 concentrations in heat-stressed broiler chickens.  a,b,c,d standard error bars sharing different letters are significantly different (*p* \< 0.05).  Data are shown as means and standard error (*n* = 12).  α1-AGP: alpha-1-acid-glycoprotein, HSP70: heat shock protein 70, CPN: ceruloplasmin.  Diets: Negative control (NC): basal diet without any supplementation, positive control (PC): basal diet + 0.02% oxytetracycline (*w*/*w*), AA: basal diet + 0.02% ascorbic acid (*w*/*w*), RI11: basal diet + 0.3% postbiotic RI11 (*v*/*w*), RS5: basal diet + 0.3% postbiotic RS5 (*v*/*w*), UL4: basal diet + 0.3% postbiotic UL4 (*v*/*w*).](animals-10-00982-g001){#animals-10-00982-f001}

![ Effect of feeding different postbiotics on plasma corticosterone concentration in heat-stressed broiler chickens.  Data represent means and standard error (*n* = 12).  Diets: Negative control (NC): basal diet without any supplementation, Positive control (PC): basal diet + 0.02% oxytetracycline (*w*/*w*), AA: basal diet + 0.02% ascorbic acid (*w*/*w*), RI11: basal diet + 0.3% postbiotic RI11 (*v*/*w*), RS5: basal diet + 0.3% postbiotic RS5 (*v*/*w*), UL4: basal diet + 0.3% postbiotic UL4 (*v*/*w*).](animals-10-00982-g002){#animals-10-00982-f002}

animals-10-00982-t001_Table 1

###### 

Antioxidant enzymes activities in heat-stressed broilers fed with three different postbiotics. 

  Parameter      Diets ^1^   SEM          *p*-Values                                                   
  -------------- ----------- ------------ ------------- ----------- ------------- ------------ ------- -------
  T-AOC (mM)     0.63 ^c^    0.67 ^b,c^   0.68 ^b,c^    0.79 ^a^    0.76 ^a,b^    0.69 ^b,c^   0.017   0.028
  GPx (µmol/L)   529.65      569.23       530.2         678.22      569.01        672.9        24.64   0.286
  CAT (U/L)      3.95 ^b^    4.27 ^b^     4.46 ^a,b^    5.01 ^a^    4.39 ^a,b^    4.48 ^a,b^   0.096   0.046
  GSH (µM)       42.29 ^b^   42.20 ^b^    45.30 ^a,b^   46.72 ^a^   45.71 ^a,b^   46.22 ^a^    0.534   0.026
  SOD (U/mL)     0.955       0.959        0.981         1.190       0.944         1.069        0.028   0.129

^a,b,c^ Means within a row sharing different superscript letters are significantly different (*p* \< 0.05).  ^1^ Diets: NC (negative control): basal diet without any supplementation, PC (positive control): basal diet + 0.02% oxytetracycline (*w*/*w*), AA: basal diet + 0.02% ascorbic acid (*w*/*w*), RI11: basal diet + 0.3% postbiotic RI11 (*v*/*w*), RS5: basal diet + 0.3% postbiotic RS5 (*v*/*w*), UL4: basal diet + 0.3% postbiotic UL4 (*v*/*w*).  SEM: Standard error of means.  T-AOC: Total-antioxidant capacity; GPx: Glutathione peroxidase; CAT: Catalase; GSH: Glutathione; SOD: Superoxide dismutase. 

animals-10-00982-t002_Table 2

###### 

Plasma lipid profiles (mmol/L) in heat-stressed broiler chickens fed with three different postbiotics. 

  Parameter      Diets ^1^   SEM           *p*-Values                                                    
  -------------- ----------- ------------- ------------- ----------- ------------- ------------- ------- ----------
  Cholesterol    3.46 ^a^    2.816 ^a,b^   2.46 ^b^      1.78 ^c^    1.916 ^b,c^   2.033 ^b,c^   0.149   0.003
  Triglyceride   1.016 ^a^   0.77 ^a,b^    0.64 ^a,b^    0.416 ^b^   0.456 ^b^     0.34 ^b^      0.070   0.043
  VLDL           0.203 ^a^   0.154 ^a,b^   0.128 ^a,b^   0.083 ^b^   0.091 ^b^     0.068 ^b^     0.014   0.043
  LDL            0.783 ^a^   0.638 ^a^     0.446 ^b^     0.403 ^b^   0.386 ^b^     0.408 ^b^     0.033   \<0.0001
  HDL            1.1883      1.44          1.415         2.19        1.8783        1.74          0.104   0.126

^a,b,c^ Means within a row sharing different superscript letters are significantly different (*p* \< 0.05).  ^1^ Diets: NC (negative control): basal diet without any supplementation, PC (positive control): basal diet + 0.02% oxytetracycline (*w*/*w*), AA: basal diet + 0.02% ascorbic acid (*w*/*w*), RI11: basal diet + 0.3% postbiotic RI11 (*v*/*w*), RS5: basal diet + 0.3% postbiotic RS5 (*v*/*w*), UL4: basal diet + 0.3% postbiotic UL4 (*v*/*w*).  SEM: Standard error of means.  VLDL: very low density lipoprotein, LDL: low density lipoprotein, HDL: high density lipoprotein. 

animals-10-00982-t003_Table 3

###### 

Breast meat quality and thigh lipid peroxidation in heat-stressed broilers fed with three different postbiotics. 

  Parameter                     Diets ^1^     SEM            *p*-Values                                                      
  ----------------------------- ------------- -------------- ------------- ----------- --------------- ------------- ------- ----------
  pH                            5.72 ^c^      5.77 ^c^       0.0007        6.01 ^a^    5.85 ^b,c^      5.95 ^a,b^    0.02    0.0007
  Drip loss %                   3.90 ^a^      2.90 ^a,b^     0.024         2.32 ^b^    2.87 ^a,b^      2.20 ^b^      0.15    0.024
  Cooking loss %                21.64 ^a,b^   23.13 ^a^      0.009         17.89 ^c^   19.20 ^c^       19.38 ^b,c^   0.39    0.009
  Shear force (g)               1113.8 ^a^    1021.6 ^a,b^   0.042         922.6 ^b^   949.1 ^b^       965.8 ^b^     18.25   0.042
  Colour                                                                                                                     
  L\* (Lightness)               49.02 ^a^     48.47 ^a^      45.82 ^b,c^   44.84 ^c^   47.32 ^ab^      45.96 ^b,c^   0.34    0.001
  a\* (Redness)                 4.51          4.58           4.81          5.27        5.01            4.92          0.18    0.877
  b\* (Yellowness)              14.54 ^a,b^   15.60 ^a^      15.41 ^a^     12.63 ^c^   14.10 ^a,b,c^   13.18 ^b,c^   0.23    0.0003
  TBARS (µg MDA/g thigh meat)   9.85 ^a^      8.91 ^a,b^     9.04 ^a,b^    7.01 ^c^    8.22 ^b,c^      7.37 ^c^      0.213   \<0.0001

^a,b,c^ Means within a row sharing different superscript letters are significantly different (*p* \< 0.05).  ^1^ Diets: NC (negative control): basal diet without any supplementation, PC (positive control): basal diet + 0.02% oxytetracycline (*w*/*w*), AA: basal diet + 0.02% ascorbic acid (*w*/*w*), RI11: basal diet + 0.3% postbiotic RI11 (*v*/*w*), RS5: basal diet + 0.3% postbiotic RS5 (*v*/*w*), UL4: basal diet + 0.3% postbiotic UL4 (*v*/*w*).  SEM: Standard error of means, L\*: Lightness, a\*: Redness, b\*: Yellowness, TBARS: Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, MDA: Mainlymalondialdehyde.