The full dataset viewer is not available (click to read why). Only showing a preview of the rows.
The dataset generation failed because of a cast error
Error code: DatasetGenerationCastError
Exception: DatasetGenerationCastError
Message: An error occurred while generating the dataset
All the data files must have the same columns, but at some point there are 2 new columns ({'question', 'answer'}) and 2 missing columns ({'assistant_response', 'user_query'}).
This happened while the csv dataset builder was generating data using
hf://datasets/itllm52/testloi/morocco_ip_articles_txt.csv (at revision dc7b1ef7cd8e22488e01c4d70dffdfb78cf2e4ea)
Please either edit the data files to have matching columns, or separate them into different configurations (see docs at https://hf.co/docs/hub/datasets-manual-configuration#multiple-configurations)
Traceback: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 2011, in _prepare_split_single
writer.write_table(table)
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/arrow_writer.py", line 585, in write_table
pa_table = table_cast(pa_table, self._schema)
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/table.py", line 2302, in table_cast
return cast_table_to_schema(table, schema)
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/table.py", line 2256, in cast_table_to_schema
raise CastError(
datasets.table.CastError: Couldn't cast
question: string
answer: string
-- schema metadata --
pandas: '{"index_columns": [{"kind": "range", "name": null, "start": 0, "' + 489
to
{'user_query': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'assistant_response': Value(dtype='string', id=None)}
because column names don't match
During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/job_runners/config/parquet_and_info.py", line 1321, in compute_config_parquet_and_info_response
parquet_operations = convert_to_parquet(builder)
File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/job_runners/config/parquet_and_info.py", line 935, in convert_to_parquet
builder.download_and_prepare(
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 1027, in download_and_prepare
self._download_and_prepare(
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 1122, in _download_and_prepare
self._prepare_split(split_generator, **prepare_split_kwargs)
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 1882, in _prepare_split
for job_id, done, content in self._prepare_split_single(
File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 2013, in _prepare_split_single
raise DatasetGenerationCastError.from_cast_error(
datasets.exceptions.DatasetGenerationCastError: An error occurred while generating the dataset
All the data files must have the same columns, but at some point there are 2 new columns ({'question', 'answer'}) and 2 missing columns ({'assistant_response', 'user_query'}).
This happened while the csv dataset builder was generating data using
hf://datasets/itllm52/testloi/morocco_ip_articles_txt.csv (at revision dc7b1ef7cd8e22488e01c4d70dffdfb78cf2e4ea)
Please either edit the data files to have matching columns, or separate them into different configurations (see docs at https://hf.co/docs/hub/datasets-manual-configuration#multiple-configurations)Need help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.
user_query
string | assistant_response
string |
|---|---|
I'm considering a case between Euro48 in the Unknown domain and Salha85 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use? | null |
I need arguments for an opposition involving Labindus,33 (Unknown) and Ama03 (Unknown). | From an economic perspective: Specific economic damages or losses are not explicitly detailed in the opposition document. However, the potential consumer confusion due to the similarity of the two brands, serving identical product classes, could imply potential economic implications.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 on the right to oppose according to law n°17-97 related to the protection of industrial property as modified and completed by laws n° 31-05 and 23-13.. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Clean57 from the Unknown domain and Laayouni30 from the Unknown domain? | Based on similarity: Le consommateur pertinent peut percevoir la marque contestée comme une sous-marque, une variante de la marque antérieure. Les entreprises font souvent des variations de leurs marques pour désigner de nouvelles gammes de produits ou créer une version modernisée.. |
I'm considering a case between Bazar47 in the Unknown domain and Anaqa22 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use? | Based on similarity: The opposing party argues the similarity in phonetic and visual aspects between 'CLEAN & FRESH' and 'CLEAN & FRESCH'. They claim that the opposed brand has similar sounding, which could lead to confusion among their customers.. Legally, you can consider: L'opposition est basée sur l'article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13. L'opposition est justifiée par un risque potentiel de confusion entre les marques et des préjudices potentiels pour le titulaire de la marque existante.. |
I need arguments for an opposition involving Sulfonation22 (Unknown) and Nostradis11 (Unknown). | Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 of Law n° 17-97 concerning the protection of industrial property, modified and completed by Laws n° 31-05 and 23-13.. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Morus56 from the Unknown domain and Nostradis38 from the Unknown domain? | From an economic perspective: L'opposante estime que l'enregistrement de la marque cible pourrait nuire à sa notoriété et à son business. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 on the right to oppose according to law n°17-97 related to the protection of industrial property as modified and completed by laws n° 31-05 and 23-13.. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Anaqa55 from the Unknown domain and Bazar60 from the Unknown domain? | From an economic perspective: Non spécifié dans le document.. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Kokomilano27 from the Unknown domain and L'opposant43 from the Unknown domain? | Based on similarity: L'opposant affirme que la marque cible est visuellement et phonétiquement très similaire à sa marque existante. Il soutient que cela pourrait tromper le public sur l'origine et la qualité des produits vendus sous la marque cible. Il souligne également que les produits désignés par la marque cible sont identiques à ceux de sa marque existante, ce qui pourrait engendrer un risque de confusion accru.. Legally, you can consider: L'article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13. |
I need arguments for an opposition involving Newprotect78 (Unknown) and Morus83 (Unknown). | Based on similarity: L'opposition est basée sur plusieurs éléments dont l'antériorité de la marque, la comparaison des produits/services, la comparaison des signes, et l'appréciation globale du risque de confusion.. |
I need arguments for an opposition involving Euro92 (Unknown) and Salha96 (Unknown). | Based on similarity: The similar phonetic and visual elements between the new 'OVI' brand name and the existing 'UVI' trademark are the main grounds for the opposition. The two brand names share the dominant and distinctive verbal elements 'VI', and they serve similar classes of products (03, 05). This raises the argument that consumers may perceive the new brand as an offshoot or an updated version of the existing brand.. Legally, you can consider: Articles 140,143 and 153 of Law 17/97 as amended by Laws 31-05 and 21-13, which grant the opposing party the right to contest any trademark registration that they perceive as prejudicial.. |
I need arguments for an opposition involving Ste06 (Unknown) and Morus21 (Unknown). | Based on similarity: Les produits couverts par les deux signes sont identiques. Les deux signes en question comportent des éléments verbaux distinctifs et dominants similaires.. From an economic perspective: Specific economic harms or losses due to the opposed trademark weren't detailed in the provided extract.. Legally, you can consider: Loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle, en particulier l'article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Ral44 from the Unknown domain and Sulfonation10 from the Unknown domain? | Based on similarity: L'opposition est basée sur plusieurs éléments dont l'antériorité de la marque, la comparaison des produits/services, la comparaison des signes, et l'appréciation globale du risque de confusion.. From an economic perspective: L'opposante estime que l'enregistrement de la marque cible pourrait nuire à sa notoriété et à son business. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving L'opposant00 from the Unknown domain and Ama29 from the Unknown domain? | null |
I need arguments for an opposition involving Nostradis31 (Unknown) and Salha82 (Unknown). | Based on similarity: Sur la base des aspects conceptuels des éléments composant les signes en cause, il est soutenu que le public pourrait percevoir la marque PROTEGER comme une sous-marque ou une variante de la marque LABINDUS. C'est une pratique courante pour les entreprises de faire des variations de leurs marques pour désigner de nouvelles gammes de produits ou pour moderniser une marque.. From an economic perspective: KOKOMILANO argue de la possibilité que le public soit induit en erreur quant à l'origine et la qualité de ses produits, ce qui pourrait avoir des implications économiques négatives pour la société.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148 de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle, modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13.. |
I need arguments for an opposition involving Liberty36 (Unknown) and Kayna35 (Unknown). | Based on similarity: The document mentioned comparison at the level of products and signs (on a visual and phonetic basis) but does not provide a detailed comparison.. Legally, you can consider: L'opposition est basée sur l'article 148.2 de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13.. |
I'm considering a case between Ste66 in the Unknown domain and Liberty42 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use? | Based on similarity: La notoriété de la marque déposante, l’antériorité de la marque, la comparaison des produits/services, la comparaison des signes, l'appréciation globale du risque de confusion. Aucun détail supplémentaire sur les similitudes n'a été fourni.. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Ral43 from the Unknown domain and Bellakhdar48 from the Unknown domain? | Legally, you can consider: Articles 140,143 and 153 of Law 17/97 as amended by Laws 31-05 and 21-13, which grant the opposing party the right to contest any trademark registration that they perceive as prejudicial.. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Newprotect69 from the Unknown domain and Ral33 from the Unknown domain? | null |
I need arguments for an opposition involving Bellakhdar81 (Unknown) and Ral00 (Unknown). | Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits/services, la comparaison des signes, l’appréciation globale du risque de confusion. From an economic perspective: The document does not provide specific economic arguments. However, the opposing party has inferred potential business losses due to the confusion that could arise from the similarity in brand names.. Legally, you can consider: Les articles 140,143 et 153 de la loi 17/97 telle que modifiée par les lois 31-05 et 21-13, ainsi que l'article 148.2 de la loi 17.97. |
I need arguments for an opposition involving Liberty67 (Unknown) and Univers46 (Unknown). | null |
I'm considering a case between Liberty99 in the Unknown domain and Laayouni68 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use? | From an economic perspective: KOKOMILANO argue de la possibilité que le public soit induit en erreur quant à l'origine et la qualité de ses produits, ce qui pourrait avoir des implications économiques négatives pour la société.. |
I need arguments for an opposition involving Euro09 (Unknown) and Moto86 (Unknown). | Based on similarity: La notoriété de la marque déposante, l’antériorité de la marque, la comparaison des produits/services, la comparaison des signes, l'appréciation globale du risque de confusion. Aucun détail supplémentaire sur les similitudes n'a été fourni.. From an economic perspective: L'opposante estime que l'enregistrement de la marque cible pourrait nuire à sa notoriété et à son business. Legally, you can consider: The opposition is founded on Article 148.2 of Moroccan law n°17-97 concerning Industrial Property protection, as modified and completed by laws n° 31-05 and 23-13, granting any right holder the option to oppose a trademark registration that could be prejudicial to their rights.. |
I need arguments for an opposition involving L'opposant03 (Unknown) and Laayouni69 (Unknown). | Based on similarity: The similar phonetic and visual elements between the new 'OVI' brand name and the existing 'UVI' trademark are the main grounds for the opposition. The two brand names share the dominant and distinctive verbal elements 'VI', and they serve similar classes of products (03, 05). This raises the argument that consumers may perceive the new brand as an offshoot or an updated version of the existing brand.. From an economic perspective: KOKOMILANO argue de la possibilité que le public soit induit en erreur quant à l'origine et la qualité de ses produits, ce qui pourrait avoir des implications économiques négatives pour la société.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Ste92 from the Unknown domain and Laayouni87 from the Unknown domain? | Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits, la comparaison des signes et l'appréciation globale du risque de confusion.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 on the right to oppose according to law n°17-97 related to the protection of industrial property as modified and completed by laws n° 31-05 and 23-13.. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Laayouni53 from the Unknown domain and Kokomilano46 from the Unknown domain? | Based on similarity: The document states that the opposition is based on the articles of law related to trademark infringement and confusion. However, due to insufficient data in the provided text, the exact comparison between the targeted trademark 'SWINGA' and the existing trademark is unknown.. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Ama25 from the Unknown domain and Sulfonation84 from the Unknown domain? | From an economic perspective: The document does not provide specific economic arguments. However, the opposing party has inferred potential business losses due to the confusion that could arise from the similarity in brand names.. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Univers42 from the Unknown domain and Labindus,32 from the Unknown domain? | Based on similarity: The opponent believes the targeted trademark might be perceived as a sub-brand or variant of his existing trademark, thus leading to potential confusion among consumers.. |
I'm considering a case between Laayouni45 in the Unknown domain and Salha52 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use? | From an economic perspective: Specific economic harms or losses due to the opposed trademark weren't detailed in the provided extract.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13. |
I need arguments for an opposition involving Newprotect96 (Unknown) and Labindus,37 (Unknown). | Based on similarity: Les produits et services des deux marques sont IDENTIQUES (classe 31). Au niveau des signes, la marque contestée n'est qu'une reproduction de la marque antérieure et elles partagent les mêmes syllabes MO/RU/S et MA/RU/SA.. From an economic perspective: L'opposant estime que la demande d'enregistrement contestée touche directement le consommateur et que ces agissements sont constitutifs de pratiques contraires aux usages honnêtes en matière commerciale, répréhensibles pour concurrence déloyale au sens de l’article 184 de la loi 17-97.. |
I need arguments for an opposition involving Euro43 (Unknown) and Boussafa83 (Unknown). | From an economic perspective: Specific economic harms or losses due to the opposed trademark weren't detailed in the provided extract.. |
I'm considering a case between Anaqa68 in the Unknown domain and Clean91 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use? | Based on similarity: The perceived similarity between the two trademarks isn't detailed in the provided extract. However, the opposition document suggests a comparison will be made, citing the applicant's trademarks' notoriety, anteriority, and an overall assessment of the risk of confusion.. From an economic perspective: Non mentionné. Legally, you can consider: Loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle, telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13. |
I need arguments for an opposition involving Ama76 (Unknown) and Bella29 (Unknown). | Based on similarity: Les produits et services des deux marques sont IDENTIQUES (classe 31). Au niveau des signes, la marque contestée n'est qu'une reproduction de la marque antérieure et elles partagent les mêmes syllabes MO/RU/S et MA/RU/SA.. From an economic perspective: The opponent argues potential violation of consumer protection laws and considers the registration act as unfair competition which might lead to economic damages.. |
I'm considering a case between Bazar81 in the Unknown domain and Ama81 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use? | Based on similarity: The similar phonetic and visual elements between the new 'OVI' brand name and the existing 'UVI' trademark are the main grounds for the opposition. The two brand names share the dominant and distinctive verbal elements 'VI', and they serve similar classes of products (03, 05). This raises the argument that consumers may perceive the new brand as an offshoot or an updated version of the existing brand.. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Euro42 from the Unknown domain and Nostradis83 from the Unknown domain? | Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits et services, la comparaison des signes (les marques elles-mêmes), et l'appréciation du risque de confusion entre les deux marques.. |
I'm considering a case between Bazar92 in the Unknown domain and Salha87 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use? | Based on similarity: Les deux marques ont des éléments verbaux distinctifs et dominants similaires, pouvant porter atteinte aux droits d'antériorité de NEWPROTECT sur sa marque 'METRINE 25'.. Legally, you can consider: L'opposition est basée sur l'article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13. L'opposition est justifiée par un risque potentiel de confusion entre les marques et des préjudices potentiels pour le titulaire de la marque existante.. |
I'm considering a case between Bellakhdar12 in the Unknown domain and Kokomilano26 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use? | Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits et services, la comparaison des signes (les marques elles-mêmes), et l'appréciation du risque de confusion entre les deux marques.. From an economic perspective: L'opposant estime que la demande d'enregistrement contestée touche directement le consommateur et que ces agissements sont constitutifs de pratiques contraires aux usages honnêtes en matière commerciale, répréhensibles pour concurrence déloyale au sens de l’article 184 de la loi 17-97.. Legally, you can consider: l’article 148.2 sur le droit d’opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n°31-05 et 23-13. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Ferbalmo00 from the Unknown domain and Ama37 from the Unknown domain? | From an economic perspective: L'opposant estime que la demande d'enregistrement contestée touche directement le consommateur et que ces agissements sont constitutifs de pratiques contraires aux usages honnêtes en matière commerciale, répréhensibles pour concurrence déloyale au sens de l’article 184 de la loi 17-97.. Legally, you can consider: Articles 140, 143, 148.2, et 153 de la loi 17/97. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Bellakhdar31 from the Unknown domain and Bazar52 from the Unknown domain? | null |
I need arguments for an opposition involving Ste20 (Unknown) and L'opposant12 (Unknown). | From an economic perspective: Specific economic harms or losses due to the opposed trademark weren't detailed in the provided extract.. Legally, you can consider: La base légale est l'article 148.2 de la loi n°17-97 sur la protection de la propriété industrielle modifiée et complétée par les lois n°31-05 et 23-13.. |
I need arguments for an opposition involving Euro79 (Unknown) and Clean09 (Unknown). | Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits, la comparaison des signes et l'appréciation globale du risque de confusion.. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving L'opposant91 from the Unknown domain and Ste02 from the Unknown domain? | From an economic perspective: The document does not provide specific economic arguments. However, the opposing party has inferred potential business losses due to the confusion that could arise from the similarity in brand names.. |
I'm considering a case between Univers91 in the Unknown domain and Clean65 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use? | Based on similarity: Les deux marques ont des éléments verbaux distinctifs et dominants similaires, pouvant porter atteinte aux droits d'antériorité de NEWPROTECT sur sa marque 'METRINE 25'.. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Ral80 from the Unknown domain and Anaqa24 from the Unknown domain? | From an economic perspective: Not specified in the document. |
I'm considering a case between Univers68 in the Unknown domain and Ferbalmo10 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use? | null |
I'm considering a case between Univers21 in the Unknown domain and Anaqa89 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use? | Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Kayna46 from the Unknown domain and Bazar55 from the Unknown domain? | null |
I need arguments for an opposition involving Newprotect89 (Unknown) and Ferbalmo87 (Unknown). | Based on similarity: The perceived similarity between the two trademarks isn't detailed in the provided extract. However, the opposition document suggests a comparison will be made, citing the applicant's trademarks' notoriety, anteriority, and an overall assessment of the risk of confusion.. From an economic perspective: L'opposant estime que la demande d'enregistrement contestée touche directement le consommateur et que ces agissements sont constitutifs de pratiques contraires aux usages honnêtes en matière commerciale, répréhensibles pour concurrence déloyale au sens de l’article 184 de la loi 17-97.. Legally, you can consider: L'article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13. |
I need arguments for an opposition involving Sulfonation51 (Unknown) and Boussafa94 (Unknown). | Based on similarity: The opposing party argues the similarity in phonetic and visual aspects between 'CLEAN & FRESH' and 'CLEAN & FRESCH'. They claim that the opposed brand has similar sounding, which could lead to confusion among their customers.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 on the right to oppose according to law n°17-97 related to the protection of industrial property as modified and completed by laws n° 31-05 and 23-13.. |
I need arguments for an opposition involving Ama89 (Unknown) and Sulfonation42 (Unknown). | null |
I need arguments for an opposition involving Bazar81 (Unknown) and Sulfonation88 (Unknown). | From an economic perspective: Non spécifié dans le document.. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Ama34 from the Unknown domain and Ste57 from the Unknown domain? | Legally, you can consider: Loi 17/97 modifiée par les lois 31-05 et 21-13, article 148.2. |
I'm considering a case between Labindus,98 in the Unknown domain and L'opposant90 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use? | From an economic perspective: L'opposant estime que la demande d'enregistrement contestée touche directement le consommateur et que ces agissements sont constitutifs de pratiques contraires aux usages honnêtes en matière commerciale, répréhensibles pour concurrence déloyale au sens de l’article 184 de la loi 17-97.. |
I'm considering a case between Bazar83 in the Unknown domain and Liberty89 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use? | Legally, you can consider: Loi marocaine 17-97 relative à la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois 23.13 et 31.05. |
I'm considering a case between Morus65 in the Unknown domain and Ferbalmo21 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use? | From an economic perspective: Not specified in the document. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Liberty38 from the Unknown domain and Bazar26 from the Unknown domain? | From an economic perspective: Specific economic harms or losses due to the opposed trademark weren't detailed in the provided extract.. Legally, you can consider: La société RAL TRADE invoque les dispositions de l'article 148.2 de la loi 17-97 modifiée et complétée par les lois 23.13 et 31.05. Les articles 137, 154, 155, 225 et 226 de ladite loi sont cités en relation avec la contrefaçon de la marque.. |
I need arguments for an opposition involving L'opposant06 (Unknown) and Salha25 (Unknown). | From an economic perspective: L'opposant estime que la demande d'enregistrement contestée touche directement le consommateur et que ces agissements sont constitutifs de pratiques contraires aux usages honnêtes en matière commerciale, répréhensibles pour concurrence déloyale au sens de l’article 184 de la loi 17-97.. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Liberty42 from the Unknown domain and Salha26 from the Unknown domain? | Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits/services, la comparaison des signes, l’appréciation globale du risque de confusion. Legally, you can consider: Loi 17-97, telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois 23.13 et 31.05, donnant droit à tout titulaire de droit antérieur, d'intenter une action en opposition contre une demande d'enregistrement d'une marque qui lui est préjudiciable. Plus particulièrement les articles 137, 154, 155, 225 et 226 de la loi 17-97 sont cités.. |
I'm considering a case between Laayouni55 in the Unknown domain and Kayna45 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use? | From an economic perspective: KOKOMILANO argue de la possibilité que le public soit induit en erreur quant à l'origine et la qualité de ses produits, ce qui pourrait avoir des implications économiques négatives pour la société.. |
I need arguments for an opposition involving Labindus,41 (Unknown) and Clean01 (Unknown). | Based on similarity: Les produits et services des deux marques sont IDENTIQUES (classe 31). Au niveau des signes, la marque contestée n'est qu'une reproduction de la marque antérieure et elles partagent les mêmes syllabes MO/RU/S et MA/RU/SA.. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Sulfonation46 from the Unknown domain and Nostradis74 from the Unknown domain? | Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits, la comparaison des signes et l'appréciation globale du risque de confusion.. Legally, you can consider: La base légale est l'article 148.2 de la loi n°17-97 sur la protection de la propriété industrielle modifiée et complétée par les lois n°31-05 et 23-13.. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Laayouni48 from the Unknown domain and Ama80 from the Unknown domain? | null |
I need arguments for an opposition involving Kokomilano44 (Unknown) and Nostradis62 (Unknown). | Based on similarity: The perceived similarity between the two trademarks isn't detailed in the provided extract. However, the opposition document suggests a comparison will be made, citing the applicant's trademarks' notoriety, anteriority, and an overall assessment of the risk of confusion.. |
I'm considering a case between Bella73 in the Unknown domain and Anaqa03 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use? | Based on similarity: Les deux marques ont des éléments verbaux distinctifs et dominants similaires, pouvant porter atteinte aux droits d'antériorité de NEWPROTECT sur sa marque 'METRINE 25'.. From an economic perspective: Not specified in the document. |
I'm considering a case between Laayouni51 in the Unknown domain and Ral16 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use? | Based on similarity: Le consommateur pertinent peut percevoir la marque contestée comme une sous-marque, une variante de la marque antérieure. Les entreprises font souvent des variations de leurs marques pour désigner de nouvelles gammes de produits ou créer une version modernisée.. From an economic perspective: Not specified in the document. |
I need arguments for an opposition involving Salha05 (Unknown) and Euro51 (Unknown). | From an economic perspective: KOKOMILANO argue de la possibilité que le public soit induit en erreur quant à l'origine et la qualité de ses produits, ce qui pourrait avoir des implications économiques négatives pour la société.. |
I'm considering a case between Univers98 in the Unknown domain and Liberty54 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use? | From an economic perspective: The opponent argues potential violation of consumer protection laws and considers the registration act as unfair competition which might lead to economic damages.. Legally, you can consider: Les articles 140,143 et 153 de la loi 17/97 telle que modifiée par les lois 31-05 et 21-13, ainsi que l'article 148.2 de la loi 17.97. |
I need arguments for an opposition involving Labindus,07 (Unknown) and Bazar90 (Unknown). | Based on similarity: Le consommateur pertinent peut percevoir la marque contestée comme une sous-marque, une variante de la marque antérieure. Les entreprises font souvent des variations de leurs marques pour désigner de nouvelles gammes de produits ou créer une version modernisée.. From an economic perspective: L'opposante estime que l'enregistrement de la marque cible pourrait nuire à sa notoriété et à son business. Legally, you can consider: Les articles 140,143 et 153 de la loi 17/97 telle que modifiée par les lois 31-05 et 21-13, ainsi que l'article 148.2 de la loi 17.97. |
I need arguments for an opposition involving Univers59 (Unknown) and Ste50 (Unknown). | null |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Clean38 from the Unknown domain and Ferbalmo31 from the Unknown domain? | Based on similarity: The opposing party argues the similarity in phonetic and visual aspects between 'CLEAN & FRESH' and 'CLEAN & FRESCH'. They claim that the opposed brand has similar sounding, which could lead to confusion among their customers.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Nostradis73 from the Unknown domain and Ama01 from the Unknown domain? | Based on similarity: Les produits couverts par les deux signes sont identiques. Les deux signes en question comportent des éléments verbaux distinctifs et dominants similaires.. Legally, you can consider: La base légale est l'article 148.2 de la loi n°17-97 sur la protection de la propriété industrielle modifiée et complétée par les lois n°31-05 et 23-13.. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Ama23 from the Unknown domain and Kokomilano08 from the Unknown domain? | Based on similarity: L'opposant fait valoir que la marque déposée W.BESTECKHAUS SCHAFER est une contrefaçon visuelle et phonétique de sa marque antérieure KOCHTOPFHAUS SCHAFER. Cette contrefaçon risque de tromper le public sur l'origine et la qualité des produits.. From an economic perspective: The opponent argues potential violation of consumer protection laws and considers the registration act as unfair competition which might lead to economic damages.. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Nostradis48 from the Unknown domain and Laayouni81 from the Unknown domain? | Based on similarity: The opponent believes the targeted trademark might be perceived as a sub-brand or variant of his existing trademark, thus leading to potential confusion among consumers.. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Euro37 from the Unknown domain and Moto27 from the Unknown domain? | Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 sur le droit d'opposition de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n°31-05 et 23-13. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Labindus,47 from the Unknown domain and Univers68 from the Unknown domain? | From an economic perspective: L'opposant estime que la demande d'enregistrement contestée touche directement le consommateur et que ces agissements sont constitutifs de pratiques contraires aux usages honnêtes en matière commerciale, répréhensibles pour concurrence déloyale au sens de l’article 184 de la loi 17-97.. |
I'm considering a case between Ama71 in the Unknown domain and Ama46 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use? | Legally, you can consider: La base légale est l'article 148.2 de la loi n°17-97 sur la protection de la propriété industrielle modifiée et complétée par les lois n°31-05 et 23-13.. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Salha16 from the Unknown domain and Nostradis35 from the Unknown domain? | Based on similarity: The opponent believes the targeted trademark might be perceived as a sub-brand or variant of his existing trademark, thus leading to potential confusion among consumers.. Legally, you can consider: Articles 140, 143, 148.2, et 153 de la loi 17/97. |
I'm considering a case between Anaqa41 in the Unknown domain and Kokomilano52 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use? | Based on similarity: The document states that the opposition is based on the articles of law related to trademark infringement and confusion. However, due to insufficient data in the provided text, the exact comparison between the targeted trademark 'SWINGA' and the existing trademark is unknown.. From an economic perspective: Specific economic damages or losses are not explicitly detailed in the opposition document. However, the potential consumer confusion due to the similarity of the two brands, serving identical product classes, could imply potential economic implications.. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Newprotect38 from the Unknown domain and Kokomilano44 from the Unknown domain? | Based on similarity: La société KOKOMILANO oppose à la demande d'enregistrement de la marque « CRYSTAL MONICA » sur la base de la similitude exacte entre les deux marques.. |
I'm considering a case between Nostradis60 in the Unknown domain and Ferbalmo45 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use? | null |
I'm considering a case between Labindus,62 in the Unknown domain and Univers28 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use? | Based on similarity: L'opposant fait valoir que la marque déposée W.BESTECKHAUS SCHAFER est une contrefaçon visuelle et phonétique de sa marque antérieure KOCHTOPFHAUS SCHAFER. Cette contrefaçon risque de tromper le public sur l'origine et la qualité des produits.. From an economic perspective: The document does not specifically mention economic damages or losses; however, the mention of potential consumer misperception suggests potential influence on LABINDUS' market position and customer relationships.. Legally, you can consider: The case is based on Article 148.2 and 184 of law n°17-97 related to the protection of industrial property, along with consumer protection laws (law n°31-08). |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Anaqa94 from the Unknown domain and Laayouni62 from the Unknown domain? | From an economic perspective: L'opposant estime que la demande d'enregistrement contestée touche directement le consommateur et que ces agissements sont constitutifs de pratiques contraires aux usages honnêtes en matière commerciale, répréhensibles pour concurrence déloyale au sens de l’article 184 de la loi 17-97.. |
I need arguments for an opposition involving Boussafa87 (Unknown) and Anaqa24 (Unknown). | Based on similarity: The perceived similarity between the two trademarks isn't detailed in the provided extract. However, the opposition document suggests a comparison will be made, citing the applicant's trademarks' notoriety, anteriority, and an overall assessment of the risk of confusion.. From an economic perspective: Non mentionné. Legally, you can consider: Article 148 de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle, modifiée et complétée par les lois n°31-05 et 23-13. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Bella03 from the Unknown domain and Sulfonation70 from the Unknown domain? | From an economic perspective: L'opposant estime que la demande d'enregistrement contestée touche directement le consommateur et que ces agissements sont constitutifs de pratiques contraires aux usages honnêtes en matière commerciale, répréhensibles pour concurrence déloyale au sens de l’article 184 de la loi 17-97.. Legally, you can consider: The opposition is launched based on article 148.2 of law №17-97 related to the protection of industrial property as amended and supplemented by laws №31-05 and 23-13.. |
I need arguments for an opposition involving Bellakhdar89 (Unknown) and Kokomilano70 (Unknown). | Based on similarity: Le consommateur pertinent peut percevoir la marque contestée comme une sous-marque, une variante de la marque antérieure. Les entreprises font souvent des variations de leurs marques pour désigner de nouvelles gammes de produits ou créer une version modernisée.. From an economic perspective: L'opposante estime que l'enregistrement de la marque cible pourrait nuire à sa notoriété et à son business. Legally, you can consider: L'opposition est basée sur l'article 148.2 de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13.. |
I need arguments for an opposition involving Bella49 (Unknown) and Liberty75 (Unknown). | From an economic perspective: Non mentionné. Legally, you can consider: Articles 140, 143 et 153 de la loi 17/97 telle que modifiée par les lois 31-05 et 21-13. |
I need arguments for an opposition involving Moto78 (Unknown) and Laayouni48 (Unknown). | From an economic perspective: L'opposante estime que l'enregistrement de la marque cible pourrait nuire à sa notoriété et à son business. |
I need arguments for an opposition involving Salha11 (Unknown) and Bellakhdar22 (Unknown). | From an economic perspective: The document does not specifically mention economic damages or losses; however, the mention of potential consumer misperception suggests potential influence on LABINDUS' market position and customer relationships.. Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 of Law n° 17-97 concerning the protection of industrial property, modified and completed by Laws n° 31-05 and 23-13.. |
I'm considering a case between Sulfonation48 in the Unknown domain and Moto26 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use? | Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits/services, la comparaison des signes, l’appréciation globale du risque de confusion. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Nostradis79 from the Unknown domain and Ferbalmo89 from the Unknown domain? | Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits/services, la comparaison des signes, l’appréciation globale du risque de confusion. |
I need arguments for an opposition involving Nostradis24 (Unknown) and Newprotect72 (Unknown). | Based on similarity: The document states that the opposition is based on the articles of law related to trademark infringement and confusion. However, due to insufficient data in the provided text, the exact comparison between the targeted trademark 'SWINGA' and the existing trademark is unknown.. From an economic perspective: Specific economic harms or losses due to the opposed trademark weren't detailed in the provided extract.. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Sulfonation83 from the Unknown domain and Bellakhdar54 from the Unknown domain? | Based on similarity: Les produits et services des deux marques sont IDENTIQUES (classe 31). Au niveau des signes, la marque contestée n'est qu'une reproduction de la marque antérieure et elles partagent les mêmes syllabes MO/RU/S et MA/RU/SA.. Legally, you can consider: The opposition is founded on Article 148.2 of Moroccan law n°17-97 concerning Industrial Property protection, as modified and completed by laws n° 31-05 and 23-13, granting any right holder the option to oppose a trademark registration that could be prejudicial to their rights.. |
I'm considering a case between Salha02 in the Unknown domain and Clean27 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use? | From an economic perspective: The document does not specifically mention economic damages or losses; however, the mention of potential consumer misperception suggests potential influence on LABINDUS' market position and customer relationships.. Legally, you can consider: Articles 140, 143, 148.2, et 153 de la loi 17/97. |
I need arguments for an opposition involving Bellakhdar72 (Unknown) and Ferbalmo21 (Unknown). | Based on similarity: The opposition indicates that the consumer relevant could perceive the contested trademark as a sub-brand or variant of the previous mark. It is common for companies to make variations of their brands, for example, by adding terms or elements, to designate new product ranges or to create a modernized version. The opponent believes that the registration of the trademark clearly infringes their legitimate rights.. Legally, you can consider: Loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle, telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Laayouni52 from the Unknown domain and Salha76 from the Unknown domain? | Based on similarity: La comparaison des produits et services, la comparaison des signes (les marques elles-mêmes), et l'appréciation du risque de confusion entre les deux marques.. From an economic perspective: The document does not specifically mention economic damages or losses; however, the mention of potential consumer misperception suggests potential influence on LABINDUS' market position and customer relationships.. |
I'm considering a case between Moto95 in the Unknown domain and Boussafa21 in the Unknown domain. What arguments can I use? | Based on similarity: Les deux marques contiennent les mêmes éléments verbaux distinctifs et dominants, présentent des similitudes sur le plan dénominatif, phonétique, visuel et conceptuel.. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Salha59 from the Unknown domain and Newprotect71 from the Unknown domain? | Legally, you can consider: Article 148.2 of Law n° 17-97 concerning the protection of industrial property, modified and completed by Laws n° 31-05 and 23-13.. |
I need arguments for an opposition involving Morus97 (Unknown) and Clean91 (Unknown). | Based on similarity: The document states that the opposition is based on the articles of law related to trademark infringement and confusion. However, due to insufficient data in the provided text, the exact comparison between the targeted trademark 'SWINGA' and the existing trademark is unknown.. From an economic perspective: Specific economic harms or losses due to the opposed trademark weren't detailed in the provided extract.. Legally, you can consider: Articles 140, 143 et 153 de la loi 17/97 telle que modifiée par les lois 31-05 et 21-13. |
I need arguments for an opposition involving Morus85 (Unknown) and Labindus,43 (Unknown). | Legally, you can consider: Articles 140, 143, 148.2, et 153 de la loi 17/97. |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Kayna75 from the Unknown domain and Liberty87 from the Unknown domain? | null |
Can you provide arguments for a case involving Liberty14 from the Unknown domain and Ama00 from the Unknown domain? | From an economic perspective: Non spécifié dans le document.. Legally, you can consider: L'opposition est basée sur l'article 148.2 de la loi n°17-97 relative à la protection de la propriété industrielle telle que modifiée et complétée par les lois n° 31-05 et 23-13.. |
End of preview.