archived
stringclasses
2 values
author
stringlengths
3
20
author_fullname
stringlengths
4
12
body
stringlengths
0
22.5k
comment_type
stringclasses
1 value
controversiality
stringclasses
2 values
created_utc
stringlengths
10
10
edited
stringlengths
4
12
gilded
stringclasses
7 values
id
stringlengths
1
7
link_id
stringlengths
7
10
locked
stringclasses
2 values
name
stringlengths
4
10
parent_id
stringlengths
5
10
permalink
stringlengths
41
91
retrieved_on
stringlengths
10
10
score
stringlengths
1
4
subreddit_id
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_name_prefixed
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_type
stringclasses
1 value
total_awards_received
stringclasses
19 values
False
Vigorous_Vertigo
t2_nnzvy
The name could be a problem for some with LibreOffice installed though: `$ which uno` `/usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/uno`
null
0
1543632611
False
0
eatwx90
t3_a1s9y5
null
null
t3_a1s9y5
/r/programming/comments/a1s9y5/uno_a_uniq_like_cli_tool_for_log_data_a_tiny_tool/eatwx90/
1546263323
6
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
hasen-judy
t2_2j2as8va
This, a million times. The industry needs more people who understand this point. The whole flexibility biznis was sold to companies by consultants who would profit from creating a complex (convoluted) system that only they can understand.
null
0
1544768043
False
0
ebr3u77
t3_a5y50c
null
null
t1_ebqt7s7
/r/programming/comments/a5y50c/why_bad_software_architecture_is_easy_to_monetize/ebr3u77/
1547586604
13
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
[deleted]
None
[deleted]
null
1
1543632632
1543672115
0
eatwy0p
t3_a1we32
null
null
t1_eatgnyu
/r/programming/comments/a1we32/i_put_words_on_this_webpage_so_you_have_to_listen/eatwy0p/
1546263333
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Snowtype
t2_2rwuie3t
I have to deal with an "architect" 9-to-5 programmer on my team who insists on having wrapper layers between every piece of the application (including duplicate data structure wrappers), who's now blaming me for delaying the project after pushing onto me the whole work of connecting the poorly matching wrappers with the actual working code. I'm just going to delete the whole pile of junk instead.
null
0
1544768055
False
0
ebr3ukj
t3_a5y50c
null
null
t1_ebr0aw6
/r/programming/comments/a5y50c/why_bad_software_architecture_is_easy_to_monetize/ebr3ukj/
1547586609
13
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Xgamer4
t2_7by79
The article contains this quote explaining why: > Lowe's listings clarify a few things: first, he has not tested any of these disks, and second, owning these disks is not the same as owning the legal rights to freely or commercially distribute their contents. "Realize that, while you’ll have my data as of the day of Larry 1’s creation, you will not own the intellectual property rights to the game, the code, the art, or anything else," Lowe says in the LSL1 listing. "Nor do I. The IP rights were sold over and over again, until they are now owned by a German game company." EDIT: The deleted parent comment asked, essentially, "why is he selling this when he could be open-sourcing it?". Why the parent deleted him comment... I don't know. This is neither the first nor last time someone on reddit would learn the answer to the question by reading the article.
null
0
1543632781
1543641634
0
eatx3kb
t3_a1y1rq
null
null
t1_eatrufd
/r/programming/comments/a1y1rq/al_lowe_reveals_his_sierra_source_code/eatx3kb/
1546263401
16
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
slvrsmth
t2_htpyc
Seems neat for the simple end of the requirements spectrum, which arguably covers most of the enterprise-y applications. Two main concerns for me are * at what latency / internet spottiness does this break down at, and * how screwed are you when requirements take you outside the comfort zone? Like adding dynamic charts, or listening to gyroscope events.
null
0
1544768058
False
0
ebr3un1
t3_a5umm4
null
null
t3_a5umm4
/r/programming/comments/a5umm4/phoenixliveview_interactive_realtime_apps_no_need/ebr3un1/
1547586610
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
nilukush
t2_agkst
Scary. We need to be careful when sharing our work.
null
0
1543632930
False
0
eatx908
t3_a1tazn
null
null
t3_a1tazn
/r/programming/comments/a1tazn/company_google_tried_to_patent_my_work_after_a/eatx908/
1546263468
0
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
aa93
t2_4vyut
How is it that this comment is dumb in the same way most of your comments are, but it doesn't use the same words?
null
0
1544768160
False
0
ebr3xkt
t3_a5umm4
null
null
t1_ebq5pz5
/r/programming/comments/a5umm4/phoenixliveview_interactive_realtime_apps_no_need/ebr3xkt/
1547586646
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
remimorin
t2_kt9oq
So much fun exactly this, then answers plain wrong. Is broccoli a small tree? No, it's a part of a plant, it is flower bud but not a tree. Maybe it's a kind of tree? Actually it's a colony of small evil aliens whose goal is to ruin supper. Just joking it's tree poo in fact and so on... So much fun.
null
0
1543632947
False
0
eatx9oi
t3_a1rp4s
null
null
t1_eatkyhc
/r/programming/comments/a1rp4s/why_is_2_i_i_faster_than_2_i_i_java/eatx9oi/
1546263476
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
PC__LOAD__LETTER
t2_pgt8t
I mean the implication here is that the operations, small they may be, would need to be repeated at such frequency to where performance was a realistic concern. That’s common in industry stuff where things scaled beyond expectation.
null
0
1544768225
False
0
ebr3zep
t3_a5sg9k
null
null
t1_ebppssu
/r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebr3zep/
1547586669
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
kckaaos
t2_jugm0
At the processor level, multiplication can be very inconsistent on execution times. For instance 47\*2 is much faster to execute than 2\*47 ​ 47\*2 can be performed with a single operation (Arithmetic Shift Left). Literally shifting left multiplies by two. 2\*47, on the other hand, takes 11 ASLs and 4 additions. This is to say 2\*47=2\*(32+15)= 2\*32+2\*15= 2\*(2\*2\*2\*2\*2)+2\*15= 2\*(2\*2\*2\*2\*2)+2(8+7)= 2\*(2\*2\*2\*2\*2)+2\*8+2\*7= 2\*(2\*2\*2\*2\*2)+2\*(2\*2\*2)+2\*7= 2\*(2\*2\*2\*2\*2)+2\*(2\*2\*2)+2\*(4+3)= 2\*(2\*2\*2\*2\*2)+2\*(2\*2\*2)+2\*4+2\*3= 2\*(2\*2\*2\*2\*2)+2\*(2\*2\*2)+2\*(2\*2)+2\*3= 2\*(2\*2\*2\*2\*2)+2\*(2\*2\*2)+2\*(2\*2)+2\*(2+1)= 2\*(2\*2\*2\*2\*2)+2\*(2\*2\*2)+2\*(2\*2)+2\*2+2=
null
0
1543633245
False
0
eatxkbm
t3_a1rp4s
null
null
t3_a1rp4s
/r/programming/comments/a1rp4s/why_is_2_i_i_faster_than_2_i_i_java/eatxkbm/
1546263637
9
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
sim642
t2_49npq
Should have used verified programming even. Doesn't compile until you prove it's correct.
null
0
1544768666
False
0
ebr4bh7
t3_a5ylm8
null
null
t3_a5ylm8
/r/programming/comments/a5ylm8/should_have_used_ada_1_how_some_famous/ebr4bh7/
1547586817
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
TrolliestTroll
t2_5pqrh
I’m guessing you quoted the wrong fragment, or perhaps I didn’t make my position clear, but I am in fact arguing in favor of type systems. In other words I think the trade off of constraining expression space to enable greater reasoning at the level of types is a worthwhile one in most (but perhaps not all) scenarios. To your second point, I agree. Sometimes it feels as if the type system is hampering your ability to express an idea you “know” is right, often because it is... by design! To this I have two remarks. First, remember that this isn’t a matter of power. Due to Turing equivalence, there is always an escape hatch to do what you want to do by merely subverting the type system in some way. The trade off is, by definition, that you lose safety for the parts of the code that you “hide” from the type checker. Second, such hacks are usually not necessary because for almost every semantically valid but logically unsound program you may want to express, there is usually a logically sound analog. It may require reworking the problem space a bit (type Tetris as it’s sometimes referred), but it nevertheless allows you to recover the incredibly valuable property of soundness. Finally, it’s important to keep in mind that the degree to which expression space is constrained lives on a continuum. Specifically it is proportional to the expressive power of the type system in question. Languages like C are static but are very inexpressive at the level of types. Conversely, languages like Haskell and it’s dependently types cousins Coq, Idris, etc are maximally expressive and therefore make it possible to type far more programs while maintaining soundness. Of course there are still provably error free programs that these systems make challenging to express, but practically speaking those live as limit edge cases of things you’re likely to need, and as mentioned there is often an analogous form that can be natively expressed.
null
0
1543633288
False
0
eatxltu
t3_a1o5iz
null
null
t1_eatgpez
/r/programming/comments/a1o5iz/maybe_not_rich_hickey/eatxltu/
1546263655
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
nil_von_9wo
t2_33yai
Any non-trivial solution eventually grows to become complicated. Good architecture anticipates and prepares for complication and thereby helps to make it manageable. It also doesn't actually add complication, though it may depend upon adding some boiler plate code and developers who are actually literate to read code instead of just write it.
null
0
1544768722
False
0
ebr4cyj
t3_a5y50c
null
null
t1_ebqmn8j
/r/programming/comments/a5y50c/why_bad_software_architecture_is_easy_to_monetize/ebr4cyj/
1547586836
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
TheHobo
t2_340mj
>Thomas Edison's entire business model. [Family Guy did it](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gu5ffdGvBCw)
null
0
1543633291
False
0
eatxlx9
t3_a1tazn
null
null
t1_eatpxq6
/r/programming/comments/a1tazn/company_google_tried_to_patent_my_work_after_a/eatxlx9/
1546263657
5
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
seagal_impersonator
t2_8rtwr
Doesn't this imply that your typing speed is the bottleneck? I seriously doubt that it is. I daresay that if typing speed is even close to being the bottleneck, you aren't thinking about your code nearly enough.
null
0
1544768759
False
0
ebr4dzm
t3_a5ylm8
null
null
t1_ebqwhnh
/r/programming/comments/a5ylm8/should_have_used_ada_1_how_some_famous/ebr4dzm/
1547586849
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
jephthai
t2_591d
Where did I say they don't exist? I said each has its place and usefulness.
null
0
1543633642
False
0
eatxxx6
t3_a1o5iz
null
null
t1_eathgt7
/r/programming/comments/a1o5iz/maybe_not_rich_hickey/eatxxx6/
1546263804
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
grauenwolf
t2_570j
Get rid of semi colon line terminators and that makes a lot of sense. But with them the language lacks any enforcement.
null
0
1544768779
1544773218
0
ebr4eiw
t3_a5ylm8
null
null
t1_ebr2r6j
/r/programming/comments/a5ylm8/should_have_used_ada_1_how_some_famous/ebr4eiw/
1547586855
0
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
gredr
t2_qb5vu
I think you have to lay a significant amount of the blame at the feet of the Chocolaty people (who made Boxstarter). I get it, from the JS people's perspective, it was a "package" and therefore was safe, well-tested, and well-supported (because why wouldn't a package be?), but this pile of dung was a team effort.
null
0
1543633896
False
0
eaty6nw
t3_a1u6ge
null
null
t1_eat6tc4
/r/programming/comments/a1u6ge/bug_the_latest_nodejs_lts_can_make_permanent/eaty6nw/
1546263913
18
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
grauenwolf
t2_570j
It also doubles the line count, which is why I don't use it. Especially in languages where dead code detection prevents this specific error.
null
0
1544768933
False
0
ebr4iq5
t3_a5ylm8
null
null
t1_ebqotad
/r/programming/comments/a5ylm8/should_have_used_ada_1_how_some_famous/ebr4iq5/
1547586907
-6
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
xxgreg
t2_33ypa
It's possible. But not officially supported. See: https://github.com/google/flutter-desktop-embedding
null
0
1543634002
False
0
eatyadw
t3_9zpn0h
null
null
t1_eaf4qkr
/r/programming/comments/9zpn0h/flutter_the_good_the_bad_and_the_ugly/eatyadw/
1546263959
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
stargazer83
t2_5alkr
That was 5 years ago. I could not get how it fits any of my use cases. So I dropped it. Now, 5 years later, I figured out a use case that would be a great fit, learnt again how Docker works, and used it. And it serves me very well, much better than other solutions I previously used. If that's hype wagon for you or "I forced myself to use it", so be it!
null
0
1544769100
1544795696
0
ebr4n41
t3_a5xzo8
null
null
t1_ebqhcwa
/r/programming/comments/a5xzo8/dockerize_your_development_environment/ebr4n41/
1547586961
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
didibus
t2_4xpocx2
Okay, that's interesting, I havn't seen someone professionally not writing tests in a while. I'm genuinely curious to know how that is working out. You make it sound like its going pretty well. Can I ask what's the specific language you're using and how big the code base is?
null
0
1543634037
False
0
eatybnf
t3_a1o5iz
null
null
t1_eat534c
/r/programming/comments/a1o5iz/maybe_not_rich_hickey/eatybnf/
1546263974
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
shAdOwArt
t2_ccpc1
What do you mean by ”I think actual flexible code is typically the result of factoring out common elements of working systems”? Could you give an example?
null
0
1544769130
False
0
ebr4nw3
t3_a5y50c
null
null
t1_ebqt7s7
/r/programming/comments/a5y50c/why_bad_software_architecture_is_easy_to_monetize/ebr4nw3/
1547586970
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
perspectiveiskey
t2_3kibl
That's actually a great idea that I'll never do. But thanks for the chuckle!
null
0
1543634040
False
0
eatybr3
t3_a1we32
null
null
t1_eattu2r
/r/programming/comments/a1we32/i_put_words_on_this_webpage_so_you_have_to_listen/eatybr3/
1546263976
10
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
nil_von_9wo
t2_33yai
While lasagna pattern is a thing, there is good argument to be made that *sometimes* some of the extra layers exist for consistency with code where they are actually needed. By being consistent, the code becomes more predictable and therefore easier (even if somewhat more laborious) to maintain. For example, I worked on a project where to fetch any data from the database, we needed to call the repo which would delegate to a dao and then send the data back wrapped in a DTO. So, any time the model needed to be revised, we needed to touch (or create!) at least 3 files, not including where the data would actually be consumed. This was useless for about 80% of the code, but none of the developers needed to memorize which 20% actually needed this.
null
0
1544769204
False
0
ebr4pul
t3_a5y50c
null
null
t1_ebr0sau
/r/programming/comments/a5y50c/why_bad_software_architecture_is_easy_to_monetize/ebr4pul/
1547586994
6
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
hasen-judy
t2_2j2as8va
Probably because of some words that someone else put on a website.
null
0
1543634086
False
0
eatydei
t3_a1we32
null
null
t1_eatt3r1
/r/programming/comments/a1we32/i_put_words_on_this_webpage_so_you_have_to_listen/eatydei/
1546263996
49
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
bartonski
t2_493wz
Just as an exercise, how many orders of magnitude is there between the resources used by web browser that you're using to read this and the difference between `cat foo | grep bump` and `grep bump foo`?
null
0
1544769424
False
0
ebr4vn7
t3_a5sg9k
null
null
t1_ebpl67z
/r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebr4vn7/
1547587067
5
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
[deleted]
None
[deleted]
null
0
1543634228
False
0
eatyif4
t3_a1tazn
null
null
t1_eatjznl
/r/programming/comments/a1tazn/company_google_tried_to_patent_my_work_after_a/eatyif4/
1546264058
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
bedobi
t2_k155g
And then the next dev or autoformatter comes and reformats it to if (condition) doSomething() and then the next dev comes and adds if (condition) doSomething() doAnotherThing() thinking that they are both inside the if, when in fact only one of them is. There are countless examples of this resulting in very, very serious bugs in systems that affect pretty much everyone. Meanwhile if (condition) { doSomething() } has negligible to no impact on readability, but prevents a very serious and common bug. There's no reasonable justification why the compiler shouldn't enforce it, or, if it doesn't, code analysis shouldn't enforce it.
null
0
1544769689
1544769980
0
ebr52i2
t3_a5ylm8
null
null
t1_ebr2r6j
/r/programming/comments/a5ylm8/should_have_used_ada_1_how_some_famous/ebr52i2/
1547587152
24
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
AffectionateTotal7
t2_2ku10f9f
I just wanted to say I tried to test this in C++ but llvm optimized main to `printf("%d\n", 119860736);`
null
0
1543634286
False
0
eatyki6
t3_a1rp4s
null
null
t3_a1rp4s
/r/programming/comments/a1rp4s/why_is_2_i_i_faster_than_2_i_i_java/eatyki6/
1546264084
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
[deleted]
None
[deleted]
null
0
1544769691
False
0
ebr52jt
t3_a5zjwu
null
null
t3_a5zjwu
/r/programming/comments/a5zjwu/bootstrap_340_released/ebr52jt/
1547587153
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
AffectionateTotal7
t2_2ku10f9f
I tried in clang. llvm optimized main to `printf("%d\n", 119860736);`
null
0
1543634590
False
0
eatyuuh
t3_a1rp4s
null
null
t1_easqtem
/r/programming/comments/a1rp4s/why_is_2_i_i_faster_than_2_i_i_java/eatyuuh/
1546264241
5
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Yuioup_____
t2_goi8g
http://youmightnotneedjquery.com/
null
0
1544769702
False
0
ebr52tp
t3_a5zjwu
null
null
t1_ebqz6kd
/r/programming/comments/a5zjwu/bootstrap_340_released/ebr52tp/
1547587156
24
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
yeahbutbut
t2_cccqr
> \> Yeah I mess up and have logic errors, or forget to handle some database exception > >All errors are type errors in a sufficiently eloquent type system. Unhandled exceptions and logic errors as well (safe stuff like wrong spelling in strings of course ;) ​ And sufficiently complicated logical expressions can be undecidable. Undecidability is not a property I want in a type system ;-)
null
0
1543634724
False
0
eatyzdo
t3_a1o5iz
null
null
t1_eatfv7d
/r/programming/comments/a1o5iz/maybe_not_rich_hickey/eatyzdo/
1546264297
0
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Daell
t2_46uwm
4Head
null
0
1544769729
False
0
ebr53j7
t3_a5mk9z
null
null
t1_ebqm368
/r/programming/comments/a5mk9z/visual_studio_code_version_130_released/ebr53j7/
1547587165
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
AlwaysHopelesslyLost
t2_ezus4
There are a LOT of comments on that. I feel like they should have been ripped out into a chat room?
null
0
1543634790
False
0
eatz1op
t3_a1rp4s
null
null
t1_eas9m8o
/r/programming/comments/a1rp4s/why_is_2_i_i_faster_than_2_i_i_java/eatz1op/
1546264325
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
theoneandonlypatriot
t2_yjg5r
Because it works? Why do you need a full article for this?
null
0
1544769794
False
0
ebr559x
t3_a5y50c
null
null
t3_a5y50c
/r/programming/comments/a5y50c/why_bad_software_architecture_is_easy_to_monetize/ebr559x/
1547587215
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
ILikeFreeGames
t2_l9pwn
Gotcha. Yeah, I was sorta assuming software emulation for RISC-V.
null
0
1543634822
False
0
eatz2so
t3_a1rp4s
null
null
t1_eatjyoz
/r/programming/comments/a1rp4s/why_is_2_i_i_faster_than_2_i_i_java/eatz2so/
1546264339
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Gotebe
t2_2y75
Having seen systems that were flexible in ways that weren't needed when change came and systems that were flexible correctly, but the flexibility had the additional complexity that has an operating cost, I am not sure. "Flexibility" is often a lure. A spring flexes in one direction, not in another, and I must know what direction I'll need upfront, otherwise... It comes down to predicting the future. I see more failures than success in that. I also see that a good *grasp* on the current *inflexible* system *is* the needed flexibility.
null
0
1544770000
False
0
ebr5al8
t3_a5y50c
null
null
t1_ebqqz3k
/r/programming/comments/a5y50c/why_bad_software_architecture_is_easy_to_monetize/ebr5al8/
1547587281
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
xxgreg
t2_33ypa
Don't forget Flutter actually started 4+ years ago. This is about 2 years before Kotlin's 1.0 release. Kotlin native, especially iOS support, is even newer. i.e. At the time the Flutter team chose to use Dart, Kotlin wasn't very mature, and didn't offer the features the team thought would make the project successful. Edit: Also: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16476292
null
0
1543634978
1543635441
0
eatz8kk
t3_9zpn0h
null
null
t1_eadkku3
/r/programming/comments/9zpn0h/flutter_the_good_the_bad_and_the_ugly/eatz8kk/
1546264410
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
janinesutto
t2_6ay8lht
HA!
null
0
1544770008
False
0
ebr5at5
t3_a5sg9k
null
null
t3_a5sg9k
/r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebr5at5/
1547587283
-1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
DeltaNerd
t2_axz1w
I mean sure but we are having a discussion. It's alright we all love programming(sometimes) here. Middle ground
null
0
1543635032
False
0
eatzana
t3_a1rp4s
null
null
t1_eatfn15
/r/programming/comments/a1rp4s/why_is_2_i_i_faster_than_2_i_i_java/eatzana/
1546264436
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
30thnight
t2_n8xgv
Mixing jQuery in React / Vue build is a bit annoying.
null
0
1544770021
False
0
ebr5b5f
t3_a5zjwu
null
null
t1_ebqz6kd
/r/programming/comments/a5zjwu/bootstrap_340_released/ebr5b5f/
1547587288
20
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
myringotomy
t2_9f1cg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_to_file_and_first_to_invent The relevant quote >The America Invents Act signed on 16 September 2011,[7] switched U.S. right to the patent from the previous "first-to-invent" system to a "first-inventor-to-file" system for patent applications filed on or after 16 March 2013.[8] >If it worked the way you just said, there would be literally nothing stopping every patent troll in the world from just looking for un-patented commercial products, getting the patent, and then extorting the companies in question. Happens more often than you think.
null
0
1543635059
False
0
eatzbq5
t3_a1tazn
null
null
t1_eattu61
/r/programming/comments/a1tazn/company_google_tried_to_patent_my_work_after_a/eatzbq5/
1546264449
-8
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Gotebe
t2_2y75
It's not intentional in a sense that they want to exploit the client. But they surely have different incentives, they are a bitch.
null
0
1544770241
False
0
ebr5gyt
t3_a5y50c
null
null
t1_ebr3u77
/r/programming/comments/a5y50c/why_bad_software_architecture_is_easy_to_monetize/ebr5gyt/
1547587359
8
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
locotx
t2_4cdu0
this was very interesting..... great post
null
0
1543635179
False
0
eatzgey
t3_a1rp4s
null
null
t3_a1rp4s
/r/programming/comments/a1rp4s/why_is_2_i_i_faster_than_2_i_i_java/eatzgey/
1546264507
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
jiffier
t2_cx0s7
Well, I need to ssh to remote servers, and edit many types of files in there. What is tramp? Hever heard of it.
null
0
1544770266
False
0
ebr5hk7
t3_a5i57x
null
null
t1_ebq85b7
/r/programming/comments/a5i57x/the_rise_of_microsoft_visual_studio_code/ebr5hk7/
1547587367
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
orclev
t2_3y51q
This thread is a literary Hitler.
null
0
1543635326
False
0
eatzlv5
t3_a1we32
null
null
t1_eatwy0p
/r/programming/comments/a1we32/i_put_words_on_this_webpage_so_you_have_to_listen/eatzlv5/
1546264575
10
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
growl360
t2_1vk9za20
This is just cringy
null
0
1544770296
False
0
ebr5id3
t3_a3q1vh
null
null
t1_ebq8ofi
/r/programming/comments/a3q1vh/its_official_chromium_is_coming_to_microsoft_edge/ebr5id3/
1547587377
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
flerchin
t2_jk1pz
That's all my business actually understands. Blah blah this is going to take longer than expected blah blah blah
null
0
1543635591
False
0
eatzvs6
t3_a1we32
null
null
t3_a1we32
/r/programming/comments/a1we32/i_put_words_on_this_webpage_so_you_have_to_listen/eatzvs6/
1546264697
11
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
dpash
t2_5bdkm
Why? How do I know it's at all relevant to me? Your title is bad and you should feel bad. For what it's worth for anyone else, the article title is > Software disenchantment and is another article about bloat in modern software. A better title would have been > I urge everyone to read this *article on software bloat*
null
0
1544770297
1544770631
0
ebr5ie8
t3_a62ef2
null
null
t3_a62ef2
/r/programming/comments/a62ef2/i_urge_everyone_to_read_this/ebr5ie8/
1547587377
6
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Fer2409
t2_2ksg196l
Really?
null
0
1543635839
False
0
eau04si
t3_a1ysx2
null
null
t3_a1ysx2
/r/programming/comments/a1ysx2/hacker_hijacks_50000_printers_with_pret_to_tell/eau04si/
1546264837
74
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Plasticcaz
t2_98nns
That sentence made perfect sense, /u/akher just chose to interpret it in a silly way. You chose the right article.
null
0
1544770311
False
0
ebr5irc
t3_a5p0ct
null
null
t1_ebpprbj
/r/programming/comments/a5p0ct/extending_a_language_with_reader_macros_a_subset/ebr5irc/
1547587381
7
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
NotUniqueOrSpecial
t2_3wrgy
> Happens more often than you think. Does it? I'm thinking no. I've been through this process. I've had to attend corporate meetings on a near-yearly basis about how this works. I'm one of the inventors on a granted patent, and am one of the inventors on a good handful of others that are currently going through the process. I'm the engineer in the company that gets pulled into the meetings with the in-house counsel as well as our patent lawyers when we have to go over patent-related issues. Can you say the same? You obviously don't understand the difference between first-to-file and first-to-invent or what prior-art means. It used to be that if you could prove--despite it not being otherwise legally prior art--that you came up with something before somebody else filed for the patent, then you could invalidate their claim to the invention/get the patent yourself. That meant that if you had in-house implementations of an idea, homegrown versions of something, or even according to some, (it's probably apocryphal) had mailed yourself a registered U.S. Mail with the details and never opened it up, and, said information could be proven to predate the patent filing date you were contesting, then you could invalidate said patent and get it yourself. That changed in 2011. I even remember that because of all the meetings I had to attend *because* that fact was changing. That shift, while dramatic, did *not* change how prior-art applies in this situation; you still can't patent something that's been shown *anywhere* in public. Hell, it's not even a matter of "public". If it's not under NDA, you can't even show it to your corporate partners, your friends, or your family, without risking somebody contesting you on prior art. You're simply incorrect.
null
0
1543635988
False
0
eau0ac9
t3_a1tazn
null
null
t1_eatzbq5
/r/programming/comments/a1tazn/company_google_tried_to_patent_my_work_after_a/eau0ac9/
1546264906
11
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
IMovedYourCheese
t2_ld7yx
Don't bother. It's the same "everything is bad these days" rant that is posted here every day.
null
0
1544770377
False
0
ebr5kg3
t3_a62ef2
null
null
t3_a62ef2
/r/programming/comments/a62ef2/i_urge_everyone_to_read_this/ebr5kg3/
1547587402
5
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
ThirdEncounter
t2_1ud6zgq
Had to look it up. You were not kidding. I stand corrected.
null
0
1543636721
False
0
eau1194
t3_a1t38z
null
null
t1_eatw8fn
/r/programming/comments/a1t38z/a_collection_of_wellknown_software_failures/eau1194/
1546265239
0
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Gotebe
t2_2y75
Not the OP, but it's simply this: if I recognize parts that do X in, say, three places in a system, and I make then one part P that is now standalone, but still used by these three places, chances are, in the future there will be a 4th place that needs it, and I can just use it there. Flexible!
null
0
1544770446
False
0
ebr5m6g
t3_a5y50c
null
null
t1_ebr4nw3
/r/programming/comments/a5y50c/why_bad_software_architecture_is_easy_to_monetize/ebr5m6g/
1547587424
9
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Kamek_pf
t2_bqiiq
You're looking for a new maintainer for a tool you wrote less than 24 hours ago ?
null
0
1543636841
False
0
eau15t6
t3_a1qyws
null
null
t1_eatn7mq
/r/programming/comments/a1qyws/github_joeky888fil_unix_file_command_written_in_go/eau15t6/
1546265295
6
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
markand67
t2_11edsw
fortunately all my apps I use are not written in electron and I can use my 10 years old laptop. if you don't like bloatware, don't use it. it's not like you're forced to use atom, hyper, vscode or slack. make your choices but stop rants.
null
0
1544770751
False
0
ebr5tz1
t3_a62ef2
null
null
t3_a62ef2
/r/programming/comments/a62ef2/i_urge_everyone_to_read_this/ebr5tz1/
1547587520
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
sindisil
t2_3dd9
I give up. You have a very particular definition of bootstrapping a compiler, as opposed to the usual way of using that term (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bootstrapping_(compilers) or http://foldoc.org/bootstrap for example).
null
0
1543637202
False
0
eau1iog
t3_9j6i6y
null
null
t1_eatrklm
/r/programming/comments/9j6i6y/how_microsoft_rewrote_its_c_compiler_in_c_and/eau1iog/
1546265484
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Gotebe
t2_2y75
Hm, I would expect that the hype around this job title would start to go deflate by now.... guess not. Must be that I spend too much time on hipster websites 😁😁
null
0
1544770797
False
0
ebr5v46
t3_a5z6i5
null
null
t3_a5z6i5
/r/programming/comments/a5z6i5/full_stack_software_developer_named/ebr5v46/
1547587534
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Salami_On_Rye
t2_g5p8ne9
> Why am I paying a court some money? Because generally people don't like working for free. You could argue that taxes should fund the patent process, but if there was no cost to filing a patent, you'd end up with a bloated system. People would file patents hoping to get them through even if there was only a slim chance that it was a unique invention because, why not, it doesn't cost anything to do so?
null
0
1543637413
False
0
eau1q7z
t3_a1tazn
null
null
t1_eat90oo
/r/programming/comments/a1tazn/company_google_tried_to_patent_my_work_after_a/eau1q7z/
1546265576
7
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
AngularBeginner
t2_eky8x
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/9go8ul/software_disenchantment/ https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/9hehud/software_disenchantment_all_the_current_software/
null
0
1544771150
False
0
ebr63pg
t3_a62ef2
null
null
t3_a62ef2
/r/programming/comments/a62ef2/i_urge_everyone_to_read_this/ebr63pg/
1547587640
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
13steinj
t2_i487l
Okay, I'll ask here since it seems you're at least involved enough with the ecosystem to know these tools: * what's chocolatey * what's box starter * does node install both, or one and another installs the least common denominator. Basically what's the chain of command in terms of dependent tools here? * which tool exactly is the root of the issue * how the fuck can it change group policies which for non-pro and non-enterprise machines, don't exist? Or rather, don't have access to. Or does this only affect versions pro and enterprise?
null
0
1543637510
False
0
eau1tii
t3_a1u6ge
null
null
t1_eatw2i0
/r/programming/comments/a1u6ge/bug_the_latest_nodejs_lts_can_make_permanent/eau1tii/
1546265617
11
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Kyrolike
t2_6hhhh
Yeah I was wondering why your english is so good. That's usually not the case for japanese people :D
null
0
1544771310
False
0
ebr67nj
t3_a5s9a7
null
null
t1_ebqp6t9
/r/programming/comments/a5s9a7/planning_to_start_a_stream_for_people_who_want_to/ebr67nj/
1547587688
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Dockirby
t2_6ozpc
Officially yes, but in reality it only works well in Windows ME.
null
0
1543637783
False
0
eau23iw
t3_a1we32
null
null
t1_eat9h9a
/r/programming/comments/a1we32/i_put_words_on_this_webpage_so_you_have_to_listen/eau23iw/
1546265740
5
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
criticalcontext
t2_mq1bg
'"shrimp" in whatever.tolower()'
null
0
1544771314
False
0
ebr67r3
t3_a5sg9k
null
null
t1_ebp3da1
/r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebr67r3/
1547587689
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
sekjun9878
t2_96bnj
They rebranded didn’t they?
null
0
1543637913
False
0
eau285e
t3_a1t38z
null
null
t1_easqlab
/r/programming/comments/a1t38z/a_collection_of_wellknown_software_failures/eau285e/
1546265797
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
jonjonbee
t2_t44gw
Old man yells at sky.
null
0
1544772105
False
0
ebr6rvs
t3_a62ef2
null
null
t3_a62ef2
/r/programming/comments/a62ef2/i_urge_everyone_to_read_this/ebr6rvs/
1547587967
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
theferrit32
t2_6glap
Yeah I know for a fact that AWS crawls public GitHub repos and scans for AWS credentials people accidentally checked in, maybe on other places as well. That's pretty cool of them to do, I wonder how much it costs them compared to how much it saves them by preventing fraudulent charges and helping customer retention.
null
0
1543638300
False
0
eau2m8o
t3_a1gbqw
null
null
t1_eapvz70
/r/programming/comments/a1gbqw/ebay_japan_source_leak_as_git_folder_deployed_to/eau2m8o/
1546265971
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
ackerlight
t2_4fjbf
The performance is usually in pair with the version of Chromium used.
null
0
1544772145
False
0
ebr6sxk
t3_a5mk9z
null
null
t1_ebou79j
/r/programming/comments/a5mk9z/visual_studio_code_version_130_released/ebr6sxk/
1547587981
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
AffectionateTotal7
t2_2ku10f9f
Vhin you're alright because I'm assuming this was a random thought. But everyone who upvoted. WTF!?! Don't you have a braincell? Not only do many people not want a patent (you wouldn't be able to afford a lawsuit, maybe you can sell it if you have those skills) but it's a whole other skill to write a patent and it cost alot to submit one. Who the fuck thinks this random thought is a good idea wtf!?!
null
0
1543638315
False
0
eau2mt5
t3_a1tazn
null
null
t1_eask7lk
/r/programming/comments/a1tazn/company_google_tried_to_patent_my_work_after_a/eau2mt5/
1546266007
-4
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
jonjonbee
t2_t44gw
The problem is that the people who **need** to read and understand this (accountants and managers), aren't the people who read this subreddit.
null
0
1544772189
1544779651
1
ebr6u3j
t3_a5y50c
null
null
t3_a5y50c
/r/programming/comments/a5y50c/why_bad_software_architecture_is_easy_to_monetize/ebr6u3j/
1547587995
53
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
beyphy
t2_4zpyk
Were you guys using the standard Python interpreter? For speed, pypy is recommend. It's many orders faster than the native Python interpreter from what I remember reading.
null
0
1543638543
False
0
eau2ur8
t3_9tqxd9
null
null
t1_e8zknjn
/r/programming/comments/9tqxd9/python_is_becoming_the_worlds_most_popular_coding/eau2ur8/
1546266105
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
ygra
t2_8kizi
PowerShell works on string i a case-insensitive manner by default. But you're right in that `-contains` doesn't work like expected here.
null
0
1544772253
False
0
ebr6vtm
t3_a5sg9k
null
null
t1_ebr67r3
/r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebr6vtm/
1547588016
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
[deleted]
None
[deleted]
null
0
1543638561
False
0
eau2v98
t3_9tqxd9
null
null
t1_e8zknjn
/r/programming/comments/9tqxd9/python_is_becoming_the_worlds_most_popular_coding/eau2v98/
1546266112
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
jonjonbee
t2_t44gw
> You don't make software projects cheaper or better by being more thorough in the planning phase Nonsense, better planning never hurt anything. Of course it's possible to have too much planning, but too little is far more responsible for bad projects than too much.
null
0
1544772423
False
0
ebr70b7
t3_a5y50c
null
null
t1_ebqmn8j
/r/programming/comments/a5y50c/why_bad_software_architecture_is_easy_to_monetize/ebr70b7/
1547588072
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
earthboundkid
t2_1w5x
https://github.com/carlmjohnson/whatsit
null
0
1543638777
False
0
eau32kv
t3_a1qyws
null
null
t3_a1qyws
/r/programming/comments/a1qyws/github_joeky888fil_unix_file_command_written_in_go/eau32kv/
1546266202
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
skocznymroczny
t2_4zi6k
Why use Ada if you can just rewrite it in Rust?
null
1
1544772544
False
0
ebr73hg
t3_a5ylm8
null
null
t3_a5ylm8
/r/programming/comments/a5ylm8/should_have_used_ada_1_how_some_famous/ebr73hg/
1547588111
5
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
earthboundkid
t2_1w5x
I enjoy clean Ruby code, but the distinction of modules from import paths is fundamentally broken and makes everything needlessly painful.
null
0
1543639176
False
0
eau3fhi
t3_a1qoid
null
null
t1_eas1oho
/r/programming/comments/a1qoid/modules_in_ruby_part_i/eau3fhi/
1546266362
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Dentosal
t2_u51mk
You should do same with all software based on the USA, as well as with other Five Eyes network countries: Australia, Canada, New Zealand and UK
null
0
1544772555
False
0
ebr73rp
t3_a57th7
null
null
t1_eblrfmr
/r/programming/comments/a57th7/australias_new_encryption_laws_ensure_companies/ebr73rp/
1547588114
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
jeffzebub
t2_1nkvfd8x
I received a CS&E BS degree from UCLA in the early 90s. The undergrad CS classes there at that time focused heavily on theory. There were labs, but were meant to enable demonstration of the theory. They didn't spend much time teaching you how to program in particular languages, since you were expected to mostly figure that out on your own, and if you couldn't, then I guess that was a hint that you were in the wrong field. I agree with that approach and feel like I received a very solid foundation which has served me very well in my career for almost 30 years.
null
0
1543639255
False
0
eau3i0z
t3_a1rp4s
null
null
t1_eascnsw
/r/programming/comments/a1rp4s/why_is_2_i_i_faster_than_2_i_i_java/eau3i0z/
1546266393
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
neutronbob
t2_31jk8
This post is just one blogger's favorite new methods. There is a lot more that's happened in Java 11. Notable are a new HTTP Client and new Websocket API. There is also new variable declaration syntax inside lambdas. And lots of new methods. This [article](http://www.javamagazine.mozaicreader.com/NovemberDecember2018#&pageSet=39&page=0) in Oracle's Java Magazine gives a long-form discussion of the major points.
null
0
1544772625
False
0
ebr75ix
t3_a5umpk
null
null
t1_ebpjp8p
/r/programming/comments/a5umpk/10_new_features_in_java_11/ebr75ix/
1547588136
7
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
JustOneThingThough
t2_l1wxc
I mean, we wouldn't be able to accomplish much if they were all CMP.
null
0
1543639268
False
0
eau3ids
t3_a1sbwp
null
null
t3_a1sbwp
/r/programming/comments/a1sbwp/not_all_cpu_operations_are_created_equal/eau3ids/
1546266398
0
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Atulin
t2_jfbtb
To my knowledge, no countries but Australia require the developers to put backdoors on their software and hardware.
null
0
1544772668
False
0
ebr76l9
t3_a57th7
null
null
t1_ebr73rp
/r/programming/comments/a57th7/australias_new_encryption_laws_ensure_companies/ebr76l9/
1547588149
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
HeadAche2012
t2_873xv
Lots of spam on here lately
null
0
1543639325
False
0
eau3k9s
t3_a1we32
null
null
t3_a1we32
/r/programming/comments/a1we32/i_put_words_on_this_webpage_so_you_have_to_listen/eau3k9s/
1546266421
-4
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
cansozbir
t2_24m0s301
Is possible run model on the android with developed on the pytorch now ?
null
0
1544772690
False
0
ebr7766
t3_a44eoz
null
null
t3_a44eoz
/r/programming/comments/a44eoz/pytorch_10_released_stable/ebr7766/
1547588157
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
PsychohistorySeldon
t2_bk621
You can flopnax a dinglebop and still get good results with the shleem. Just use Plumbus.js.
null
0
1543639492
False
0
eau3pli
t3_a1we32
null
null
t3_a1we32
/r/programming/comments/a1we32/i_put_words_on_this_webpage_so_you_have_to_listen/eau3pli/
1546266487
18
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Tohnmeister
t2_8vvfa
I think companies are too afraid for off shoring or letting people work from home full time. Yes, it's a challenge, but it's certainly not undoable and an opening to a lot of potential talent.
null
0
1544772957
False
0
ebr7dvq
t3_a4n8jv
null
null
t1_ebgaccf
/r/programming/comments/a4n8jv/why_software_developers_are_paid_5x_more_in_the/ebr7dvq/
1547588239
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
WaiYanMyintMo
t2_1gss14ac
r/NoStupidQuestions
null
0
1543639573
False
0
eau3sas
t3_a1rp4s
null
null
t1_easiruo
/r/programming/comments/a1rp4s/why_is_2_i_i_faster_than_2_i_i_java/eau3sas/
1546266520
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
grauenwolf
t2_570j
Uh, wait a second. You said auto-formatter, which means you get this: if (condition) doSomething() doAnotherThing()
null
0
1544773282
False
0
ebr7lyy
t3_a5ylm8
null
null
t1_ebr52i2
/r/programming/comments/a5ylm8/should_have_used_ada_1_how_some_famous/ebr7lyy/
1547588338
11
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
ivquatch
t2_3a6gu
You can think of async/await as imperative syntax sugar for the following expression: verifyUser(username, password).then(userVerification => getRoles(username).then(rolesRetrival => logAccess(username).then(logEntry => { // ... the rest of your function }) ) ); So it's really just a monad in disguise. There are other ways of expressing this with different async semantics. As you can see, `verifyUser`, `getRoles` and `logAccess` have no dependency on one another. So, it might be more efficient to perform them in parallel. Written in applicative style, you could do something like this (roughly. this is psuedo code): new Promise(userVerification => rolesRetrieval => logEntry => { /* ... the rest of your function */ }) .apply(verifyUser(username, password)) .apply(getRoles(username)) .apply(logAccess(username)); I probably butchered the syntax, but you see what I'm getting at. Applicative style is very elegant and also a less powerful abstraction than a monad. So, it adheres nicely here to the "principle of least power". In a language with custom operators, it would look like this (psuedo code): (\userVerification rolesRetrival logEntry -> ... ) <$> verifyUser username password <*> getRoles username <*> logAccess username No special language constructs like async/await are required here. It will also await these operations in parallel since javascript promises would all be started immediately. So, while async/await is convenient, it's not always best to break out the "monad hammer" so quickly, especially in this case where sequential execution needlessly inefficient. EDIT: the `apply()` methods here corresponds to the apply function for applicative functors, not the javascript apply function.
null
0
1543639670
1543651187
0
eau3vnt
t3_a1lebc
null
null
t1_earmyay
/r/programming/comments/a1lebc/actually_callbacks_are_fine_implementing_monads/eau3vnt/
1546266562
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
rubarax
t2_37zbd
Life-changing
null
0
1544773292
False
0
ebr7m8a
t3_a5sg9k
null
null
t3_a5sg9k
/r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebr7m8a/
1547588342
-1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
distortedsignal
t2_712j6
I can help with one of those - chocolatey is a package manager for Windows. See here: https://chocolatey.org/ It's... fine. Not great.
null
0
1543639931
False
0
eau44n9
t3_a1u6ge
null
null
t1_eau1tii
/r/programming/comments/a1u6ge/bug_the_latest_nodejs_lts_can_make_permanent/eau44n9/
1546266702
14
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
nikonino
t2_sb61r
If you think about it, almost every problem regarding software is strongly related to the requirement analysis phase. Either the developers misunderstood something or the problem was there all along. The only way to ensure that you have understood something correctly is to write down workflows. My experience says that presenting diagrams not only help the stakeholders understand clearly what you are designing, but its also easier for the development team to have the bigger picture of what they are building.
null
0
1544773314
False
0
ebr7mqh
t3_a5y50c
null
null
t1_ebr390j
/r/programming/comments/a5y50c/why_bad_software_architecture_is_easy_to_monetize/ebr7mqh/
1547588348
18
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
ivquatch
t2_3a6gu
I think the article is referring to the "continuation monad" which is a way of composing callbacks without necessarily creating a pyramid of doom (aka "continuation-passing" style). Parser combinators are an example of a continuation monad (iiuc), and they're fucking awesome.
null
0
1543640056
1543640846
0
eau48to
t3_a1lebc
null
null
t1_earqc40
/r/programming/comments/a1lebc/actually_callbacks_are_fine_implementing_monads/eau48to/
1546266754
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
r0b0t1c1st
t2_47iq2
This is sloppy: import os os.system(f'sudo ifconfig {interface} down') os.system(f'sudo macchanger -r {interface}') os.system(f'sudo ifconfig {interface} up') It: * Doesn't actually check if the commands succeed * Doesn't interpolate correctly if you like to make things hard for yourself and name your interfaces with spaces in Using `subprocess` eliminates these problems: from subprocess import run run(['sudo', 'ifconfig', interface, 'down'], check=True) run(['sudo', 'macchanger', '-r', interface], check=True) run(['sudo', 'ifconfig', interface, 'up'], check=True)
null
0
1544773430
False
0
ebr7pfb
t3_a5rb95
null
null
t3_a5rb95
/r/programming/comments/a5rb95/free_hotel_wifi_with_python_and_selenium/ebr7pfb/
1547588411
4
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
[deleted]
None
[deleted]
null
0
1543640279
False
0
eau4g6x
t3_a1tazn
null
null
t1_eat4oo2
/r/programming/comments/a1tazn/company_google_tried_to_patent_my_work_after_a/eau4g6x/
1546266844
5
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
bumbumbambam
t2_x5lq3vd
Yup, these days software is being crippled on purpose, so that companies could charge you for every single feature/line of code, and even write broken code in the first place, so they could charge you again to fix it.
null
0
1544773622
False
0
ebr7tvw
t3_a5y50c
null
null
t1_ebqt7s7
/r/programming/comments/a5y50c/why_bad_software_architecture_is_easy_to_monetize/ebr7tvw/
1547588466
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null