Datasets:
66celebration
/
copies_extract

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
 Community
transcript
stringlengths
416
4.55k
details
stringlengths
88
5.54k
KABG610009462017 IN THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C, HUKKERI. Dated this 22nd day of July , 2021 Present : Sri. Ambanna K. B.Com, L.L.B. [Spl.] Civil Judge & J.M.F.C, Hukkeri. C.C.No.715/2017 Complainant : State by the P.S.I. Hukkeri Police Station, (By Learned A.P.P.,) ­Vs­ Accused : 1. Smt. Meenaxi w/o Mutteppa Tarali Age: Major, Occ: Housewife R/o: Hukkeri 2. Veeresh Mutteppa Tarali Age: Major, Occ: ­­ R/o: Hukkeri 3. Mutteppa Satappa Tarali (Dead)­ Case against A3 is abated (By Sri. R.V.Joshi, Adv.) Date of commission of offence 03.11.2016 Date of report of offence 05.11.2016 Name of the complainant Smt. Vagdevi @ Mahadevi2 w/o Ghatigeppa Tarali Date of recording of evidence 23.11.2018 Date of closing of evidence 09.04.2021 Offences complained of 323, 341, 354(A), 504 and 506 R/w. Sec.34 of Indian Penal Code Opinion of the Judge Accused persons not found guilty JUDGMENT The PSI of Hukkeri Police Station, has submitted charge sheet against the accused No.1 to 3 for the offenses having been committed under sections 323, 341, 354(A), 504 and 506 R/w. Sec.34 of Indian Penal Code. 2. The brief facts of the prosecution case is as follows: That on 03.11.2016 at about 9.00 a.m. when the CW1 was in her house CTS No.1577, 1579 of Hukkeri town, the accused persons have picked up quarrel with regard to the civil dispute and wrongfully restrained CW 1 and abused her in filthy language and assaulted her with hands and also they have outraged her modesty and gave harassment and also criminally intimidated to her life and thereby the accused persons have committed the aforesaid offences. 3. On the basis of first information given by CW.1 ­3 Smt. Vagdevi @ Mahadevi d/o Ghatigeppa Tarali , a case was registered in Hukkeri Police Station Crime No.271/2016 and FIR was sent to the Court. Panchanama of the scene of offence was conducted in the presence of punchas and statements of the witnesses were recorded. After completion of investigation, charge sheet has been filed against the accused persons for the alleged offences. 4. The cognizance of the offences was taken as per section 190(1)(b) of Cr.P.C. and summons to the accused persons was issued. The accused persons appeared before the court through their counsel and got released on bail. Copies of the charge sheet materials were furnished to the accused persons in compliance of section 207 of Cr.P.C. The opportunity being given to the accused and the prosecution. Heard before charge and charge was framed for the aforesaid offences as against the accused persons and read over and explained to them, for which they pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. During the pendency of the trial, the accused No.3 reported as dead. Hence the case as against Accused No.3 has been abated. 5. The prosecution in order to prove the guilt of the accused has examined in all two witnesses as PW.1 and PW2 and got marked documents as per ExP.1 & Ex.P.2. After the completion of the prosecution evidence the statement of the accused persons as required under section 313 Cr.P.C was recorded and explained the
{'Name': 'State by the P.S.I.', 'Address': 'Hukkeri Police Station', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Smt. Meenaxi w/o Mutteppa Tarali', 'Address': 'Hukkeri', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Veeresh Mutteppa Tarali', 'Address': 'Hukkeri', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Smt. Vagdevi @ Mahadevi', 'Address': 'w/o Ghatigeppa Tarali', 'Party Name': 'complainants'}
Form No.9 (Civil) Title Sheet for Judgment in suit (R.P. 91) IN THE COURT OF THE LXXII ADDL. CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE AT MAYO HALL BENGALURU, (CCH-73) Present: Sri.Abdul-Rahiman. A. Nandgadi, B.Com, LL.B., (Spl.,) LXXII Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru. Dated this the 16th day of March, 2022. O.S.No. 25747 /2021 Plaintiff:- ICICI Bank Limited Having its Registered Office at ICICI Tower, Near Chakli Circle, Old Padra Road, Vadodara-390 007, And its Branch office at Mythri Center, No.4/10, Hosur Road, Bommanahalli, Bangalore-560 068. Through its Authorized Signatory Mr. Pramodh. G [By Sri. Shiva & CO., –Adv.] V/sOS No.25747/2021 Defendant:- Mr. Nikhil Kumar D. R , S/o Ramappa, Aged about 27 years, R/at No.294Y, Ramappa Building, Near Prakash Bakery, Doddathoguru, Bangalore -560 100. (Exparte) Date of Institution of the suit 23.06.2021 Nature of the (Suit or pro-note, suit for declaration and possession, suit for injunction, etc.)Recovery of Money Date of the commencement of recording of the Evidence.24.02.2022 Date on which the Judgment was pronounced.16.03.2022 Year/sMonth/s Day/s Total duration 0008 21 LXXII ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, Mayohall Unit: Bengaluru. J U D G M E N T Plaintiff Bank has filed the present suit against the Defendant for recovery of money to the tune of Rs.7,01,528.13/-, as on 08.03.2021 alongwith interest @ Rs.24% p.a. from the date of filing of the suit, till its realization. 2OS No.25747/2021 2. The brief facts of the Plaintiff Bank’s case are as under: That the Plaintiff Bank is a Body corporate constituted under the Banking Act, 1949, having its Registered Office ICICI Tower, near Chakli Circle, Old Padra Road, Vadodara-390 007, having its Branch office among other offices at Mythri Center, No.4/10, Hosur Road, Bommanahalli, Bengaluru , represented by its Collection Manager and Power of Attorney Holder. The Plaintiff Bank is engaged in the business of providing financial facilities, to its customers. It has introduced Credit Card Facility, Auto Loans, Personal and Professional Home Schemes among other facilities to its customers. The Defendant approached the Plaintiff Bank for financial assistance, under Personal Loan Scheme. As per the request of the Defendant, the Plaintiff Bank has sanctioned and paid a loan of Rs.7,00,000/- to him on 24.07.2019, wherein the Defendant has agreed to repay the said loan amount in 36 monthly installments of Rs.23,765/- each, the first installment falling due on 05.09.2019 and the last installment falling due on 05.08.2022, with an agreed rate of interest at the3
{'Name': 'ICICI Bank Limited', 'Address': 'ICICI Tower, Near Chakli Circle, Old Padra Road, Vadodara-390 007', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'ICICI Bank Limited', 'Address': 'Mythri Center, No.4/10, Hosur Road, Bommanahalli, Bangalore-560 068', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Mr. Nikhil Kumar D. R', 'Address': 'No.294Y, Ramappa Building, Near Prakash Bakery, Doddathoguru, Bangalore-560 100', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Mr. Nikhil Kumar D. R', 'Address': 'No.294Y, Ramappa Building, Near Prakash Bakery, Doddathoguru, Bangalore-560 100', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
1 KAHS700009832017 IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT HOLENARASIPURA Presided Over by AMAR.V.L Dated this the 12th day of January 2022 MVC. Nos. 1419/2017, 1420/17 and 1421/17 Petitioner in MVC.1419/17Ruderegowda S/o. Annegowda, Aged about 34 years, R/at Kulume Hosuru Village, Saligrama Hobli, K.R.Nagar Taluk, Mysore District. Present R/at Hallimysore Village and Hobli, Holenarasipura Taluk, Hassan District. (By adv., Sri.V.R.S.) Petitioner in MVC.1420/17Swamy @ Swamygowda S/o. Late Lakkegowda, Aged about 30 years, R/at Kulume Hosuru Village, Saligrama Hobli, K.R.Nagar Taluk, Mysore District. Present R/at Hallimysore Village and Hobli, Holenarasipura Taluk, M.V.C.1419/2017 to 1421/17 2 Hassan District. (By adv., Sri.V.R.S.) Petitioner in MVC.1421/17Devaraja S/o. Nanjegowda, Aged about 35 years, R/at Kulume Hosuru Village, Saligrama Hobli, K.R.Nagar Taluk, Mysore District. Present R/at Hallimysore Village and Hobli, Holenarasipura Taluk, Hassan District. (By Sri.V.R.S, advocate) V/s Respondents in MVC 1419/171.Honnegowda S/o. Siddegowda, R/at Mangalawadi Village, Hallimysore Hobli, Holenarasipura Taluk, Hassan District. (Owner of Isher Mini Lorry bearing No. KA­13 B­6939) (By adv., Sri.M.V.S) 2.The Division Manager, Sri.Ram General Insurance Company Ltd., No.4/5, S.V.Arcade, Belakahalli, Main Road, Bannerughatta Road, Bangalore – 76. M.V.C.1419/2017 to 1421/17 3 Common Respondents in MVC 1420/17 and 1421/17(Respondent No.2 dismissed as per order dated 11.06.2018) 3. Manjegowda.M.K S/o.Kikkeri Gowda, R/at Mangalawadi village, Hallimysore Hobli, Holenarasipura Taluk. (Driver of Isher Mini Lorry bearing No. KA­13 B­6939) (By adv., Sri.M.A.B) 1. Honnegowda S/o. Siddegowda, R/at Mangalawadi Village, Hallimysore Hobli, Holenarasipura Taluk, Hassan District. (Owner of Isher Mini Lorry bearing No. KA­13 B­6939) (R1 by Adv., Sri.M.V.S.) 2. Manjegowda.M.K S/o. Kikkerigowda, R/at Mangalawadi Village, Hallimysore Hobli, Holenarasipura Taluk. (Driver of Isher Mini Lorry bearing No. KA­13 B­6939) (R2 by Adv., Sri.M.A.B.)
{'Name': 'Ruderegowda', 'Address': 'Kulume Hosuru Village, Saligrama Hobli, K.R.Nagar Taluk, Mysore District', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Swamy @ Swamygowda', 'Address': 'Kulume Hosuru Village, Saligrama Hobli, K.R.Nagar Taluk, Mysore District', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Devaraja', 'Address': 'Kulume Hosuru Village, Saligrama Hobli, K.R.Nagar Taluk, Mysore District', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Honnegowda', 'Address': 'Mangalawadi Village, Hallimysore Hobli, Holenarasipura Taluk, Hassan District', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Manjegowda.M.K', 'Address': 'Mangalawadi Village, Hallimysore Hobli, Holenarasipura Taluk', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Honnegowda', 'Address': 'Mangalawadi Village, Hallimysore Hobli, Holenarasipura Taluk, Hassan District', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Manjegowda.M.K', 'Address': 'Mangalawadi Village, Hallimysore Hobli, Holenarasipura Taluk', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Honnegowda', 'Address': 'Mangalawadi Village, Hallimysore Hobli, Holenarasipura Taluk, Hassan District', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'Manjegowda.M.K', 'Address': 'Mangalawadi Village, Hallimysore Hobli, Holenarasipura Taluk', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
BEFORE THE MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIM TRIBUNAL-XII, BALLARI. PRESENT; - SRI KASHIM CHURIKHAN, B.A, LL.M., MEMBER, MACT-XII, BALLARI. DATED THIS 05 th DAY OF APRIL, 2021 M.V.C. NOS: 1098/2016 MAIN CASE, CLUBBED WITH MVC 1095/2016, 1096/2016 and 1097/2016. PETITIONERS IN MVC : 1095/2016 R.Gopal Naik @ Ramavath Gopal Naik son of R.Venkatesh Naik, 24 years, Agriculturist cum coolie, R/o Lattavaram Thanda, Uravakonda Mandal, Anantapur district, A.P. presently residing at Belagal Thanda, Ballari taluk and district. PETITIONER IN MVC :1096/2016 Minor S.Durga Naik son of Late S.Anji Naik, 9 years, student, Since minor represented by his mother and natural guardian Smt. S.Sunki Bai wife of Late S.Anji Naik, 28 years, Coolie, r/o Arikera Thanda village, Alur Mandal, Kurnool District presently residing at Belagal Thanda, Ballari taluk and district. PETITIONER IN MVC : 1097/2016 Minor Mahidhar Naik son of S.Venkatesh Naik, 5 years, Since minor represented by his father and natural guardian S.Venkatesh Naik, 29 years, Coolie, R/o Lattavaram Thanda, Uravakonda Mandal, Anantapur district, A.P. presently residing at Belagal Thanda, Ballari taluk and district .2 MVC.No.1098/16 clubbed with 1095/16, 1096/16 & 1097/16. PETITIONER IN MVC : 1098/2016 Smt.S.Sunki Bai wife of Late S.Anji Naik, 28 years, Coolie, r/o Arikera Thanda village, Alur Mandal, Kurnool District presently residing at Belagal Thanda, Ballari taluk and district. (By Sri A.Pandu Rangaiah Advocate for petitioners in all the cases) V/s RESPONDENTS IN ALL CASES: 1.A.Nagaraju son of A.Parameshwarappa, 43 years, Driver of Mini School Bus bearing Reg.No.AP-02/TA-9053 R/o Nemakal village, Chippagiri Mandal, Kurnool district. 2.Bashyam Educational Society by its Secretary Owner of Mini School Bus bearing Reg.No.AP-02/TA-9053 r/o D.No.4-4-104, 3/1, Chandramouli Nagar, Bashyam road, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh State. 3.M/s.National Insurance Company Limited by its Divisional Manager, Main road, Parvathi Nagar, Ballari. (R-1: Exparte) (R-2: By Sri Jelle Hanumanthappa Yadav, Advocate) (R-3: By Sri G.Sudhakar, Advocate) ***********3 MVC.No.1098/16 clubbed with 1095/16, 1096/16 & 1097/16. :: COMMON JUDGMENT (AWARD) :: The petitioners in all cases have filed petitions under Section 166 of M.V.Act, for claiming compensation amount from the respondents in respect of injuries sustained by them in the motor accident. 2. These cases are arising out of one and same accident, the respondents are one and the same therefore to save the time and to avoid repetition of facts and to make convenient to the parties these cases are clubbed to trial and dispose together. The evidence is led in MVC No:1098/2016. 3. Stated in brief facts of the petitions are as under:- That on 21.05.2016 at about 04.45 p.m., all the petitioners were proceeding on the Bajaj Discover motorcycle bearing Reg.No.AP-02/AM-3802 from Arikeri Thanda towards Lattavaram Thanda, the petitioner in MVC.No.1095/16 was riding the said motorcycle, near Beldona village stopped the said motorcycle on the proper side of the road to give water to minor petitioner in MVC.No.1097/2016, the respondent No.1 being the driver of the Mini School Bus bearing Reg.No.AP-02/TA-9052 later it is
{'Name': 'R.Gopal Naik @ Ramavath Gopal Naik', 'Address': 'Lattavaram Thanda, Uravakonda Mandal, Anantapur district, A.P. presently residing at Belagal Thanda, Ballari taluk and district', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Minor S.Durga Naik', 'Address': 'Arikera Thanda village, Alur Mandal, Kurnool District presently residing at Belagal Thanda, Ballari taluk and district', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Minor Mahidhar Naik', 'Address': 'Lattavaram Thanda, Uravakonda Mandal, Anantapur district, A.P. presently residing at Belagal Thanda, Ballari taluk and district', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Smt.S.Sunki Bai', 'Address': 'Arikera Thanda village, Alur Mandal, Kurnool District presently residing at Belagal Thanda, Ballari taluk and district', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'A.Nagaraju', 'Address': 'Nemakal village, Chippagiri Mandal, Kurnool district', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Bashyam Educational Society', 'Address': 'D.No.4-4-104, 3/1, Chandramouli Nagar, Bashyam road, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh State', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'M/s.National Insurance Company Limited', 'Address': 'Main road, Parvathi Nagar, Ballari', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}
Judgment 1 O.S.No.278/2012 KAUP040013592017 IN THE COURT OF THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C., UDUPI Present: Shri. Shyam Prakash., B.A.L. LL.B., Addl. Civil Judge & JMFC, Udupi. Dated this 19th day of March, 2022 O.S.No.278/2012 Between 1. Smt. Leelavathi G. Shetty, Aged about 60 years, 2.Subhash Shetty, Aged about 39 years, 3.Sandeep Shetty, Aged about 33 years, 4.Gurudutt Shetty, Aged about 30 years, 5.Amar Shetty, Aged about 28 years, All are residing at Muthayya Nivas, Udupi. ...Plaintiffs. (By Sri. P.N.G.K.R., Advocate ) Judgment 2 O.S.No.278/2012 Vs 1. The Commissioner, Udupi City Municipality, Sathyamoorthy Bhavan, K.M. Marg, Udupi – 576101, Udupi Taluk and District. 2. T.M. Zafrulla, Aged about 41 years, S/o T.M. Hassan Basha, Hoode, Paduthonse Village, Udupi Taluk and District. 3. Ustad Mohammed Shafi, Aged about 38 years, S/o Ustad Khadir Basha, Hoode, Paduthonse Village, Udupi Taluk and District. …..Defendants. (D1: Exparte) (D2, 3: By Sri. K.R.A., Advocate) Date of Institution of suit 16-07-2012 Nature of the suit Mandatory & Permanent Injunction Date of Commencement of evidence 23-07-2018 Date of pronouncement of judgement 19-03-2022 Total Duration Year's Month/s Day/s 09 08 03 [Shyam Prakash ] Addl. Civil Judge & JMFC, Udupi Judgment 3 O.S.No.278/2012 JUDGMENT The present suit is filed by the plaintiffs against the defendants for the relief of mandatory injunction directing the defendant No.2 & 3 to remove or to demolish the illegal construction put up by them in the plaint "B" schedule property and in default the said acts are done through process of Court at the cost of the defendant No.2 & 3 and for perpetual injunction restraining the defendant No.2 & 3 from putting up illegal constructions in the plaint "B" schedule property and for costs & such other reliefs. 2.The brief facts of Plaintiff’s case is that , plaintiffs are the absolute owners of the suit A schedule item No.1 property bearing Sy.No.131/2P1 (131/2P1-P1) measuring to an extent of 23.5 cents bounded by East-Sy.No.131/5 & 131/6, West- portion of same S.D., North- portion of same S.D., South- Sy.No.131/9 and suit A schedule item No.2 property bearing Sy.No.131/24 (134/6P1) measuring to an extent of 6 cents, bounded by East- plaint B schedule property bearing Sy.No.131/24, West- K.M. Marg, North- suit A schedule item No.1 property and Sy.No.131/5, South- suit A schedule item No.1 property. Both suit A schedule item No.1 and 2 are situated at Moodanidamburu Village, Thenkapete Ward of Udupi City Municipality, Udupi Taluk and District. The said properties consist of residential house and commercial buildings since more than 75 years ago. Further, the plaintiffs stated that, to the west of item No.1 and south of item No.2 properties, the property of defendant No.2 and 3 i.e. the suit B schedule property bearing Sy.No.131/24 (131/6) measuring to an extent of 7 cents is situated. The defendant No.2 and 3 have obtained licence from the concerned authority to carry out multi-storied commercial complex in the B
{'Name': 'Smt. Leelavathi G. Shetty', 'Address': 'Muthayya Nivas, Udupi', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Subhash Shetty', 'Address': 'Muthayya Nivas, Udupi', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Sandeep Shetty', 'Address': 'Muthayya Nivas, Udupi', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Gurudutt Shetty', 'Address': 'Muthayya Nivas, Udupi', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Amar Shetty', 'Address': 'Muthayya Nivas, Udupi', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'The Commissioner', 'Address': 'Sathyamoorthy Bhavan, K.M. Marg, Udupi – 576101, Udupi Taluk and District', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'T.M. Zafrulla', 'Address': 'Hoode, Paduthonse Village, Udupi Taluk and District', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Ustad Mohammed Shafi', 'Address': 'Hoode, Paduthonse Village, Udupi Taluk and District', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'The Commissioner', 'Address': 'Sathyamoorthy Bhavan, K.M. Marg, Udupi – 576101, Udupi Taluk and District', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'T.M. Zafrulla', 'Address': 'Hoode, Paduthonse Village, Udupi Taluk and District', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Ustad Mohammed Shafi', 'Address': 'Hoode, Paduthonse Village, Udupi Taluk and District', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Smt. Leelavathi G. Shetty', 'Address': 'Muthayya Nivas, Udupi', 'Party Name': 'complainants'}{'Name': 'Subhash Shetty', 'Address': 'Muthayya Nivas, Udupi', 'Party Name': 'complainants'}{'Name': 'Sandeep Shetty', 'Address': 'Muthayya Nivas, Udupi', 'Party Name': 'complainants'}{'Name': 'Gurudutt Shetty', 'Address': 'Muthayya Nivas, Udupi', 'Party Name': 'complainants'}{'Name': 'Amar Shetty', 'Address': 'Muthayya Nivas, Udupi', 'Party Name': 'complainants'}{'Name': 'The Commissioner', 'Address': 'Sathyamoorthy Bhavan, K.M. Marg, Udupi – 576101, Udupi Taluk and District', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'T.M. Zafrulla', 'Address': 'Hoode, Paduthonse Village, Udupi Taluk and District', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'Ustad Mohammed Shafi', 'Address': 'Hoode, Paduthonse Village, Udupi Taluk and District', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., H.D.KOTE Present: NATARAJ YADAV .S, M.B.A., LL.B., Senior Civil Judge & J.M.F.C., H.D.Kote. Dated, this the 16th day of March, 2022 C.C. No.111/2017 Complainant : The State by H.D.Kote (By Learned A.P.P.) -Vs- Accused :Pradeep Kumar.G S/o Gangadhar, Aged about 27 years R/at Nayakara Street, Mysuru City, Mysuru District. (By Sh.G.Venugopal., Advocate) Date of the Commission of offence 12.07.2016 Offences Compliance of U/S 279/338/304A IPC and 196(A)/66 IMV Act. Name of the Complainant Sh. Gopinath.M.V Date of filing of charge sheet 20/12/2016 Date of recording evidence 15.12.2020 Date of pronouncement of Judgment 16.03.2022 Opinion of the Judge Acquittal J U D G M E N T Brief Statement of reasons for the decision of the case The concise facts of the case as alleged by the prosecution and as unfolded from the charge sheet are that on 12.07.16 at about 08.30 am, Mysuru-2 C.C. No.111/2017 Manandawadi road, HD Kote, the accused was found driving his offending TATA Winger van bearing registration No.KA 02 AA 8717 in violation of the permit in a rash and negligent manner so as to endanger human life and the personal safety of others and while driving the aforesaid offending vehicle in the aforesaid manner, he all of a sudden, turned the curve due to which the offending van got imbalanced and turned turtle and thereby caused injuries on the person of CW5/Ashwini, CW6/Anuradha, CW7/Sugubdakumari, CW8/Dipal, CW9/Shivananayaka, CW10/Mani Kumar, CW11/Divakar CW12/Basavaraju and Vijay Lakshmi who were travelling in the van. The injured Vijay Lakshmi succumbed to the injuries received by her in the said accident. On the basis of the statement given by the complainant Gopinath, the present FIR u/s 279/337/338/304 A IPC was registered at PS HD Kote. On conclusion of the investigation the present challan under the aforesaid sections was filed in the court. 2. The accused was summoned by the court for facing trial under the aforesaid sections. In compliance of Section 207 Cr. P. C., the copy of the challan and the documents annexed therewith were supplied to the accused. Prima facie charge U/s. 279/337/338/304 A IPC and U/s. 196 A/66 IMV act was made out against the accused. Accordingly, on 15.02.2017 the charge was framed by the Ld. Predecessor of this court. The accused pleaded not guilty and claimed trial to the said charge. Thereafter, the case proceeded for prosecution evidence. 3. In order to substantiate its case, the prosecution examined 2 witnesses. PW1 Sh.Gopinath S/o Sh.Venkatanagappa has testified in the court on 15.12.20. He has deposed that on 12.07.2016, he was called to Government Hospital mortuary where he was shown a dead body of his3 C.C. No.111/2017 sister namely Vijaylakshmi. He has proved the dead body identification memo of his sister. He has further testified that the dead body was handed over to him after post mortem. He has further testified that his sister succumbed to his injuries due to the said accident and the said accident did not take place before him or in his presence. He has further testified that he was present at his house when he received the information about the accident and on hearing such news, he immediately rushed for Government Hospital where his sister was got admitted. He has further testified that he came to know that when his sister was travelling in the offending vehicle from Mysuru to HD Kote the offending vehicle got toppled and his sister sustained injuries resulting in her death and as such he lodged complainant against the driver of the offending vehicle to the HD Kote PS . He has failed to identify the accused to be the driver of the offending vehicle. 4. PW2 Sh.Anuradha is also eyewitness to the accident who has testified that on 12.07.2016, she along with other passengers was going in a TATA Winger vehicle to HD Kote. She has further testified that when the offending vehicle reached Hand post, it turned over. She has further testified that she and other passengers sustained injuries while Vijaylakshmi died after the accident. Witness deposed that she cannot identify the driver of the offending vehicle. During cross examination by Ld. Defence counsel, she has stated that he does not remember the exact date when her statement was recorded by the police. She has further stated that she could not say that accident occurred due to the rash and negligent driving of the offending vehicle, but she remembered that the offending vehicle turned over after hitting against the footpath. She
{'Name': 'Pradeep Kumar.G', 'Address': 'R/at Nayakara Street, Mysuru City, Mysuru District.', 'Party Name': 'accused'}
IN THE COURT OF X ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, (DEDICATED COMMERCIAL COURT) BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU Present: Sri. Basavaraj Chengti B.Com., LL.B.(Spl.) X Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, Bengaluru. DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 COMMERCIAL A.A. NO. 108 /2021 Applicant :M/s Caterpillar Financial Services India Private Limited, 6th Floor, Tower ‘B’, Prestige Shantiniketan, The Business Precinct, Whitefield Main Road, Bengaluru, Karnataka - 560 048. (By : Sri Rishabha Raj Thakur, Advocate) V/s Respondents : 1)M/s S P Enterprises, (Prop. Shiv Kumar), Sheorajpur, Greater Noida, Gautam Nuddha Nagar, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh-201308. 2)Sushil Kumar, S/o. Bijendra Kumar, House No.196, Dagarpur, Dagarpur, Bhagpat, Uttar Pradesh- 250101. (By : Ex - parte)2 Com. A.A.108/2021 O R D E R The applicant has filed this Commercial Arbitration Application under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for interim measures to restrain the respondents from selling, alienating, transferring, disposing off or dealing with schedule vehicle/equipment, for appointment of Receiver to take possession of the schedule vehicle/equipment with the help of the police or in the alternative to direct the respondents to provide adequate security equivalent an amount of Rs. 23,46,042/- or to attach the Bank account of the respondents, movable and immovable properties to the extent of Rs. 23,46,042/- payable to him towards the outstanding dues till finalization of the arbitral award to be passed by the arbitrator. 2.The brief averments of the application are as under: The applicant is a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 engaged inter-alia in providing lease financing of vehicles and equipment manufactured by Caterpillar to a sizable number of individuals, institutions and enterprises and is represented by its duly authorized signatory. The respondent No.1 is a proprietorship concern and the respondent No.2 stood as guarantor to the various3 Com. A.A.108/2021 facilities extended by the applicant to the respondent No.1. The respondents have approached the applicant company for a financial assistance to purchase the schedule vehicle/equipment. The applicant company has explained entire terms and conditions of the loan agreement, which was duly read, understood and accepted by both the respondents. The applicant company on verifying the application and the documents annexed thereto sanctioned the loan for purchasing the said vehicle/equipment . Consequently, the respondent No.1 and 2 as borrower and guarantor having availed the loan of Rs. 22,77,916/- from the applicant company, have executed the loan and security agreement bearing Contract No.808-7000 1275 (hereinafter referred to as “LSA”) on 31.10.2020. The loan amount was to be repaid by the respondents together with interest @ 8.50% per annum in 48 monthly installments of Rs.58,813/- on stipulated due dates subject to the terms and conditions as agreed under the LSA commencing from 15.01.2021. The respondents have purchased the said vehicle/equipment on the basis of loan sanctioned by the applicant and have hypothecated the same to the applicant company as collateral security towards the loan. The respondents have constantly defaulted in payment of EMIs in spite of repeated requests, reminders and demands. They have failed to regularize the loan account and they
{'Name': 'M/s Caterpillar Financial Services India Private Limited', 'Address': '6th Floor, Tower ‘B’, Prestige Shantiniketan, The Business Precinct, Whitefield Main Road, Bengaluru, Karnataka - 560 048', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'M/s S P Enterprises', 'Address': '(Prop. Shiv Kumar), Sheorajpur, Greater Noida, Gautam Nuddha Nagar, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh-201308', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Sushil Kumar', 'Address': 'S/o. Bijendra Kumar, House No.196, Dagarpur, Bhagpat, Uttar Pradesh-250101', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'M/s S P Enterprises', 'Address': '(Prop. Shiv Kumar), Sheorajpur, Greater Noida, Gautam Nuddha Nagar, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh-201308', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Sushil Kumar', 'Address': 'S/o. Bijendra Kumar, House No.196, Dagarpur, Bhagpat, Uttar Pradesh-250101', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}
IN THE COURT OF THE XXVI ADDL. CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, AT MAYO HALL, BENGALURU (CCH.20) Present Sri.D.S.Vijaya Kumar, B.Sc, LL.B. , XXVI Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Dated this 30th day of June, 2021 Crl.Misc.No.25718/2021 Petitioner/ Accused No.2:Imran Khan, S/o Sri.Fayaz Khan, Aged about 27 years, R/a 6th Cross, Modi Garden, K.B.Sandra, R.T.Nagar Post, Bengaluru -560 032 [By Sri.TRS-Adv] Vs. Respondent:-State by D.J.Halli Police Station, Bengaluru City. [By Public prosecutor] O R D E R Petitioner has filed this petition under section- 439 of the Cr.P.C., praying for granting an order of Regular bail in respect of the offences alleged under2 Crl.Misc.No.25718/2021 sections 302, 120B read with sec.34 of I.P.C. and Sec.25(1B)(B) of Arms Act 1959, in Crime No.122/2021 of the Respondent-D.J.Halli Police Station, Bengaluru. 2. Brief facts of the bail petition are as under:- Respondent Police have falsely implicated him in the case. He is totally innocent of the offences alleged against him. He is in judicial custody since 09.04.2021. He is the only bread earner of the family. The offences are not punishable with imprisonment for life or death. He undertakes to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by the court. On all these grounds, Petitioner has sought for granting bail to him. 3. The objection filed by the prosecution to the petition is as under:-3 Crl.Misc.No.25718/2021 The Respondent Police have registered a case in Crime No.122/2021 for the offences punishable under sections 302, 120B read with sec.34 of I.P.C. and Sec.25(1B)(B) of Arms Act 1959 , against accused persons. Investigation is under progress. Petitioner has committed the offence. If the Petitioner is released on bail, he may destroy the prosecution evidence and may abscond from trial. Hence, on these grounds, learned Public Prosecutor has sought for rejection of the bail petition. 4. Heard arguments and also perused the records. 5. In the circumstances, the following points arise for determination are: 1. Whether Petitioner is entitled to an order of Regular Bail, as sought for? 2. What order?
{'Name': 'State', 'Address': 'D.J.Halli Police Station, Bengaluru City', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Imran Khan', 'Address': '6th Cross, Modi Garden, K.B.Sandra, R.T.Nagar Post, Bengaluru -560 032', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'State', 'Address': 'D.J.Halli Police Station, Bengaluru City', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Imran Khan', 'Address': '6th Cross, Modi Garden, K.B.Sandra, R.T.Nagar Post, Bengaluru -560 032', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
KABI500004782017 IN THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., KUDLIGI, SITTING AT SANDUR PRESENT : SRI. K.A. NAGESHA , B.A.L, LL.B., DATED THIS 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022 O.S. No. 66/2017 PLAINTIFFS 1) M. Devaraj, S/o Late Dodda Subbaiah Aged 58 years, Agriculture, R/o Ramanagara, Hagaribommanahalli Taluk, Ballari District. 2) Smt. Medara Basamma, W/o M. Devaraj, Aged 50 years, Medar work and Agriculture, R/o Ramanagara, Hagaribommanahalli Taluk, Ballari District. 3) M. Prema, W/o H. Thippeswamy, Aged 26 years, 2 O.S. No 66/2017 R/o Ramanagara, Hagaribommanahalli Taluk, Ballari District. 4) M. Pooja, W/o Ravi.V.S., Aged 23 years, Housewife, R/o Kambarpet, Bangaluru -01. 5) M. Roopa, W/o Naveen Kumar, Aged 21 years, Housewife, R/o Challikere Post and Taluk, Chitradurga District. (By Smt. Lalitha.B., Advocate) V/s DEFENDANTS 1) M. Eshwar S/o Late Yallamma, Aged 30 years, Coolie, R/o Taranagara Village and Post, Sandur Taluk, Ballari District. 2) Karibasappa, S/o Smt. Bharmakka, Aged 28 years, Coolie, R/o Taranagara Village and Post, Sandur Taluk, Ballari District. 3 O.S. No 66/2017 3) Smt. Chowdamma, W/o Late Hanumanthappa, R/o Medar Oni, Sandur Post & Taluk, Ballari District. 4) M. Kumaraswamy @ Kumareppa, Aged 60 years, Agriculturist, R/o Medar Oni, Sandur Post and Taluk, Ballari District. (D.1 & 2 By Sri Siddalingappa. Advocate) (D.3 & 4 By Sri A. Vijayakumar, Advocate) ORDER ON PRELIMINARY ISSUE/ISSUE No. 7 Originally, plaintiff No.1 filed this suit for the relief of partition and separate possession of his 1/5th share in the suit schedule property as per the partition deed dated 09.12.2015 and for permanent injunction. 2.Defendants No. 3 and 4 have contested the suit by filing written statement. Amongst other grounds, they have contended that Valuation in respect of the plaintiff’s share is less than Rs.5,00,000/- and therefore this Court is no jurisdiction to try this suit.
{'Name': 'M. Devaraj', 'Address': 'R/o Ramanagara, Hagaribommanahalli Taluk, Ballari District', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Smt. Medara Basamma', 'Address': 'R/o Ramanagara, Hagaribommanahalli Taluk, Ballari District', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'M. Prema', 'Address': 'R/o Ramanagara, Hagaribommanahalli Taluk, Ballari District', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'M. Pooja', 'Address': 'R/o Kambarpet, Bangaluru -01', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'M. Roopa', 'Address': 'R/o Challikere Post and Taluk, Chitradurga District', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'M. Eshwar', 'Address': 'R/o Taranagara Village and Post, Sandur Taluk, Ballari District', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'Karibasappa', 'Address': 'R/o Taranagara Village and Post, Sandur Taluk, Ballari District', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'M. Kumaraswamy @ Kumareppa', 'Address': 'R/o Medar Oni, Sandur Post and Taluk, Ballari District', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
KARN020006502009 Presented on : 16-05-2009 Registered on : 16-05-2009 Decided on : 01-10-2021 Duration : 11 years, 04 months, 16 days BEFORE THE ADDITIONAL MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL AND PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & CJM., AT RAMANAGARA :PRESENT: Smt.Anupama Lakshmi B.A., LL.B., C/c Prl. Senior Civil Judge & CJM., Ramanagara. M.V.C. No.:387/2009 DATED : THIS THE 01st DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 Petitioner : Smt.Puttamma W/o Dasegowda Aged about 45 years R/at Virupasandra Village Kasaba Hobli Malagalu Post Kanakapura Taluk Ramanagara District. 2 MVC.387­2009 (Rep by Sri.NMN., Advocate) V/s Respondents :1. Sri.L.H.Kumaraiah S/o Somanna Major in age R/at No.63, Lingapura Village Koratagere Taluk Tumkur District. 2. The Manager United India Insurance Co. Ltd., D.O.5, No.25, Shankaranarayana Building M.G.Road Bangalore. (R­1 Rep by Sri.LGG., Advocate) (R­2 Rep by Sri.KSK., Advocae) **** JUDGMENT (Delivered on 01­10­2021) This petition was dismissed on 31­12­2012 through considered judgment. MFA.No.4331/2013 was preferred before Hon'bkle High court of Karnataka. As per the judgment passed in the said MFA the matter was remitted to this Tribunal for fresh disposal. 3 MVC.387­2009 The petitioner has filed the petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act­1988 to pass an award of compensation of Rs.2,50,000/­ in her favour and for other relief. 2.The case of the petitioner is that, on 04­04­2009 at about 6:30 a.m., the petitioner was travelling as a passenger in a Bus bearing Reg.No.TN­34/B­9099 from Kanakapura Towards Ramanagara when reached near Achalu Factory Gate, then the driver of the bus drove the same in a rash and negligent manner and dashed the bus against another bus parked in the foot path. As a result of the said accident, the petitioner sustained injuries. Immediately the petitioner was taken to General Hospital, Ramanagara where she was treated as an inpatient for 15 days. She was advised to take follow up treatment for a period of 3 months. The petitioner has spent more than Rs.15,000/­ towards medition, treatment and travelling expenses. Petitioner was hale and
{'Name': 'Smt.Puttamma', 'Address': 'W/o Dasegowda, Aged about 45 years, R/at Virupasandra Village, Kasaba Hobli, Malagalu Post, Kanakapura Taluk, Ramanagara District.', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Sri.L.H.Kumaraiah', 'Address': 'S/o Somanna, Major in age, R/at No.63, Lingapura Village, Koratagere Taluk, Tumkur District.', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'The Manager', 'Address': 'United India Insurance Co. Ltd., D.O.5, No.25, Shankaranarayana Building, M.G.Road, Bangalore.', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}
KAHS020022722014 Presented on : 07-11-2014 Registered on : 07-11-2014 Decided on : 09-02-2022 . Duration : 7 years, 3 months, 2 days IN THE COURT OF II ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT Hassan,HASSAN Presided Over by LOKESHA L.A.C./447/2014 Petitioner: SIDDEGOWDA DEAD BY LRs :- 1.Sudha. W/o late Siddegowda. Age: 48 years. 2.Ashok. S/o late Siddegowda. Age: 31 years. 3.Shakunthala. D/o late Siddegowda. Age: 28 years. 4.Manjula. D/o late Siddegowda. Age: 25 years. 5.Yathish. S/o late Siddegowda. Age: 24 years.L.A.C.No.447/2014 Address: HANDARANGI VILLAGE, DUDDA HOBLI, HASSAN TQ. VERSUS Respondents:- 1.SPL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER Address: Government of karnataka 2.ASSISTANT COMMISSNER. HASSAN. 3.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD, Hasan. 4.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, K.R.D.C.L H.N.PURA ROAD HASSAN. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Advocate for Petitioner: G.RANGASWAMY . Advocate for R-1 to R-3 : D.G.P. Advocate for R-4: P.S. MOHAN. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMON JUDGMENT This case has been arisen out of the reference made by the respondent No.1 under Section 18(1) of Land Acquisition Act 1894 for adjudicating the correct market value of the acquired lands belonging to the claimant. After contest by the 1st respondent, this Court was allowed the petition in part by determining the market value of lands per gunta at Rs.1,00,000/­ as per order dated 07­11­2015. The said order 2L.A.C.No.447/2014 was challenged by the respondents 1 to 4 herein before the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in M.F.A Nos.5544/2019 (LAC). As per the order dated 16­01­2021, the said petition was allowed by Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka and matter remanded to decide the claim of the petitioner afresh, after affording an opportunity to the claimant as well as to the respondents to adduce evidence and thereafter to decide the market value of land in question afresh in accordance with law on the basis of material produced before this Court, within a period of 6 months from the date of receipt of copy of the order. Another 6 months has been extended by Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka in all connected cases vide order dated 29­10­2021 passed in M.F.A.No.6390/2019. 2. The State of Karnataka has acquired the following lands belonging to the claimant situated at Handarangi village, Dudda Hobli, Hassan Taluk for the purpose of Hassan Town Outer ring road, Hassan Town ring road under Preliminary and Final notification published in the Karnataka Gazette and the details are as hereunder:­ 3
{'Name': 'SIDDEGOWDA', 'Address': 'HANDARANGI VILLAGE, DUDDA HOBLI, HASSAN TQ.', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Sudha', 'Address': 'W/o late Siddegowda', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Ashok', 'Address': 'S/o late Siddegowda', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Shakunthala', 'Address': 'D/o late Siddegowda', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Manjula', 'Address': 'D/o late Siddegowda', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Yathish', 'Address': 'S/o late Siddegowda', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., H.D.KOTE Present: NATARAJ YADA V .S, M.B.A., LL.B., Senior Civil Judge & J.M.F.C., H.D.Kote Dated this the 1st day of March, 2021. C.C. No.342/15 Complainant : The State by H.D.Kote PS. (By Learned A.P.P.) -Vs- Accused :1.Gurumurthy S/o Mahadevaiah, Aged about 30 years, 2.Bhagyappa @ Mahesha S/o Mahadevaiah, Aged about 42 years, 3.Sadananda S/o Mahadevaiah, Aged about 32 years, All are R/at K.Belthuru Village, H.D.Kote Taluk. (By Sh. P.N.Nagendra., Advocate) Date of the Commission of offence 03.03.2015 Offences Compliance of U/s.448/354/504/506/511/34 IPC. Name of the Complainant Smt.Pushpalatha Date of filing of charge sheet 10.08.20152 C.C.No. 342/15 Date of recording evidence 08.02.2021 Date of pronouncement of Judgment 01.03.2021 Opinion of the Judge Acquittal J U D G M E N T BRIEF FACTS & REASONS FOR SUCH DECISION: The present FIR was registered at PS HD Kote against accused for the offences U/s.448 / 354/504/506/511/34 IPC. 2. In brief, case of the complainant is that on 03.03.2015 at about 10.50 pm within the jurisdiction of HD Kote Police Station, at Vishwanathaih colony, HD Kote, the accused in furtherance of their common intention voluntarily unlawfully trespassed in to the house of first informant to commit an offence and intentionally insulted CW2-Sh.Dodda Siddaiah in filthy language knowingly that will provoke him to commit breach of public peace and threatened her with dire the consequences. When first informant Smt.Pushpalatha intervene and questioned the same, the accused no.1 to 3 intentionally insulted her in filthy language knowingly that will provoke her to commit breach of public peace and they misbehaved with her by caught holding her hair and pulling her clothes and attempted to steal her chain and thereby committed offence punishable U/s. 448 / 354/504/506/511/34 IPC. 3. Investigation commenced and concluded by filing the charge sheet. Compliance of Section 207 Cr.P.C. was made. Arguments on charge were heard and charge U/s. 448 / 354/504/506/511/34 IPC was framed3 C.C.No. 342/15 against the accused to which they pleaded not guilty and opted to face trial. 4. In order to bring home the guilt against the accused, prosecution has examined as many as two witnesses namely Smt.Pushpalatha (complainant) as PW1 and other eye witness/victim CW2-Sh.Dodda Siddaraju as PW2. The remaining witnesses are admittedly not the eye - witnesses to the alleged incident and they are merely formal witnesses. Therefore, their examination would not have proved the culpability of the accused and thus, their examination would have been a futile exercise. Hence, PE was closed. SA and DE dispensed with and final arguments heard on behalf of State as well as accused. Record perused. 5. So far as offence U/s 354 IPC is concerned it stipulates that: " Whoever assaults or uses criminal force to any woman, intending to outrage or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby outrage her modesty, shall be punished with impris onment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both. 6. So far as offence U/s 504 IPC is concerned it provides that: "Whoever intentionally insults, and thereby gives provoca tion to any person, intending or knowing it to be likely that such provocation will cause him to break the public peace, or to commit any other offence, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both”. 7. So far as offence U/s 448 IPC is concerned it provides that:
{'Name': 'The State by H.D.Kote PS', 'Address': 'H.D.Kote', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Gurumurthy', 'Address': 'K.Belthuru Village, H.D.Kote Taluk', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Bhagyappa @ Mahesha', 'Address': 'K.Belthuru Village, H.D.Kote Taluk', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Sadananda', 'Address': 'K.Belthuru Village, H.D.Kote Taluk', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Smt.Pushpalatha', 'Address': 'Nan', 'Party Name': 'complainants'}
IN THE COURT 1 st ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE ., AT BALLARI. PRESENT : Smt. Veena M.Naikar, M.A.,LL.B(Spl) 1st Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Ballari. Dated this the 13 th day of November, 2018 LAC No. 90/2011 C/w 85/2011 to 89/2011 Petitioner / Claimant in LAC 85 / 2011 Smt. K.Gouramma, W/o R.Lokanagouda, D/o K.Hanumantha Gouda, major, R/o M.J.Nagar, Hospe t. //Vs.// Referring Officers / Respondents 1) The Land Acquisition Officer, Dharwad. 2) The Executive Member, Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board, Rastrothan Building, Nrupatunga Road, Bangaluru. 3) The Executive Director, Thermal Power Station, K udithini,Ballari. CLAIM:- The Referring officer has referred this matter U/Se ction 18 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894, as the above named claimant p rayed for fixation of fair compensation, as against the awarded amount of Rs. 2,57,762/- including Solatium and other benefits for 1-77 (1/2 share ) acres in respect of acquired land belonging to the claimant situated in Sy No.1001/2/A2 at Kudithini village, Bellary Tq. & District, and petitioner received t he awarded compensation amount . Award Ref. No. KIADB/L.A/ B/150/2010-2011 Date : 6-5-2010 Date of 4(1) Notification published in Gazette : 22 -4-2005 Date of taking possession of Land: 28-5-2007 Amount paid by the LAO on 26-6-2013 Cont’d…2 : 2 : Award:- This case coming on this day for final disposal bef ore me and upon perusing the statement and counter statements of claimant an d referring officer and upon the pursuing the material part of records in this c ase and hearing the arguments of Sri. J.H.N., advocate for the claimant, and Sri R.V.Venkatachalapathy, advocate for Respondent No.1, Sri P.L.P advocate for Respond ent No.2, Sri Y.Rangantha Rao, advocate for Respondent No.3 and same is having sto od over to this day for consid2eration and as by considered judgement pron ounced this day : It is ordered and awarded that, the reference petit ions are partly allowed. The claimants in each claim petition are entitled for c ompensation at Rs. 18,75,000/- per acre. The market value for the land acquired by th e Government from the claimants be worked out at the above rate. It is further ordered and awarded that the claimant s in all cases are entitled for additional amount under Section 23(1-A) of Land acq uisition Act at 12% per annum on such market value from the date of Notification U/S ec. 4(1) to date of Award till the date of award. It is further ordered and awarded that the claiman ts in all cases are entitled for solatium at 30% solatium on the enhanced market v alue under Section 23(2) of the Act. `It is further ordered and awarded that the claima nts in all cases are entitled to interest at 9% per annum on enhanced compensation a mount for the first year and they are further entitled for interest at the rate of 15 % per annum on the compensation amount until payment under Section 28 of the Act. It is further ordered and awarded that the first Re spondent shall deposit the enhanced compensation within the Statutory period o f 90 days from the date of this Judgment and the amount already received by the cla imants in each case be deducted out of the total amount awarded. It is further ordered and awarded that the claimant s in each case are entitled to proportionate cost. Cont’d…3 : 3 : LAC No. 85 / 2011 1) Compensation awarded Land value (Rs. 18,75,000/- x 1-77 acres) Rs. 33,18,750/- 2) 30% solatium on Rs.33,18,750/- Rs. 9,95,625/- 3) 12% Addl. Market value from 22-4-2005 to 6-5-20 10 ( 1839 days) i.e., from the date of Notifica tion Sec. 4(1) till date of award/payment ( Rs.33,18,750/-) Rs. 20,01,043/- Total Rs. 63,15,418/- 4) Interest at 9% from 22-4-2005 to 21-4-2006 for o ne year ( on Rs.63,15,418/-) Rs. 5,68,387/- 5) total Rs. 68,83,805/- Less : Compensation amount includes land value + solati um + Addl. Market value already awarded / received b y the petitioner from LAO Rs. 2,57,762/- Balance amount to be paid to the petitioner Rs. 66,26,043/- Given under my hand and seal of this court, this 13 th day of November, 2018 1st Addl.Senior Civil Judge, Ballari. Memorandum of costs Particulars By the claimant By the Respt1 By the Respdt 2By the Respdt 3 Vakalath 1-00 Re.1/- Re1/- Re.1/- Court Fee on petition 10-00 -- -- -- Process fee 50-00 -- -- -- Total 61-00 Re 1/- Re 1/- Re1/- Award Drafted on : 22-11-2018 Award signed on : 23-11-2018 Prl.Senior Civil Judge & CJM., Ballari
{'Name': 'Smt. K.Gouramma', 'Address': 'W/o R.Lokanagouda, D/o K.Hanumantha Gouda, major, R/o M.J.Nagar, Hospet', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'The Land Acquisition Officer', 'Address': 'Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'The Executive Member', 'Address': 'Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board, Rastrothan Building, Nrupatunga Road, Bangalore', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'The Executive Director', 'Address': 'Thermal Power Station, Kudithini, Ballari', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}
KABG600000492017 IN THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT: HUKKERI Before: Sri, K.S. Rotter, B.Com. LL.B, (Spl) Senior Civil Judge, Hukkeri. Dated this: 20 th Day of June 2022. G & WC.No.09/2017 PETITIONER:- 1. Kumar Narasappa Basavanni Narasannavar, Age: 12 years, Represented by M/G Natural Mother Smt. Suvarna W/o Basavanni Narasannavar, Age: 51 years, Occ: Household, R/o: Gudas, Taluk: Hukkeri, District: Belagavi. (By Shri, K.B. Kurabet, Advocate) //VERSUS// RESPONDENT:- -Nil- G & WC 9/2017 2 J U D G M E N T 1. This petition is filed under the provisions of Sect ions 7 and 8 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 for appointing the Na tural mother of petitioner as his guardian to the person and pro perty of a minor. 2. Brief averments of the petition are as under: The petitioner is permanent resident of Gudas villa ge in Hukkeri Taluka and she is natural mother and minor guardian of the petitioner Narasappa Basavanni Narasannavar. The hu sband of the petitioner by name Basavanni Narasannavar died leav ing behind the present petitioners as his legal heirs and after hi s death, the minor petitioner is in care and custody of his mother and she is looking after all the affairs of the minor petitioner and s he is competent to act as minor guardian of the petitioner. Further, i t is stated that, mother of the petitioner is having no means of inco me and after the death of her husband she has taken responsibility o f her family and facing financial problem for the care and custody a nd also education expenses of the minor petitioner. Further, it is st ated that, now the suit property bearing Sy.No.387/1 measuring 00 acre s 12 guntas 8 annas situated at Gudas village in Hukkeri Taluk st anding in the name of minor petitioner. Except the said land, the re are no other G & WC 9/2017 3 means of income to the present petitioner and his m other. It is stated that, now the petitioner is in need of money for hi s education expenses, medical expenses and for day to day livel ihood and they are badly in need of money to meet the said expense s. Therefore, the petitioner having left with no alternative has file d this petition for appointing the mother of the petitioner as guardian to the present petitioner and property of the minor petitioner wit h a permission to sell the minor's property and dealing with the suit schedule property. Accordingly, they prayed for allowing the petition. 3. Further, it is seen from the records that, notice o f the present petition was published in the form of citation in “Vijayvan i” Kannada Daily Newspaper on 14.02.2017 calling upon the general pu blic to contest this petition if they so interested in person and p roperty of the minor petitioner. However, nobody appeared and resisted t he present petition. 4. Thereafter, during the course of enquiry, the mothe r of minor petitioner got examined herself PW.1 and also produ ced 2 documents, which are marked at Ex.P1 & P2 and close d their side.
{'Name': 'Kumar Narasappa Basavanni Narasannavar', 'Address': 'Gudas, Taluk: Hukkeri, District: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Suvarna W/o Basavanni Narasannavar', 'Address': 'Gudas, Taluk: Hukkeri, District: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}
KABG010067922017 IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, BELAGAVI DISTRICT, AT : BELAGAVI Dated the 11th day of August, 2021 PRESENT Sri C.M.JOSHI, B.Sc., LL.M., Principal District Judge, Belagavi REGULAR APPEAL No.199/2017 APPELLANT : 1.Krishna Sateri Pawale, since deceased by his L.Rs. (By Shri Santosh B Rahut, Advocate) -Vs.- RESPONDENTS : 1.Shri. Nahin Tehnuras Kapadiaya, Since deceased by his L.R.’s and seven others 1A)Macky W/o. Nahin Kapadiya, Age:80 Years, Occ:Household, R/o. 104, Havelock Road, Camp, Belagavi. 1B)Azim Feroz Modi, Age:Major, Occ:Household work, R/o.C/o. Feroz Modi, Helmets, Vengurla Road, Near Hanuman Nagar, Belagavi. 1C)Nazreen Nahin Kapadiya, Age:Major, Occ:Household, R/o. 104, Havelock Road, Camp, Belagavi.R.A.No.199/2017 1D)Farhad Nahin Kapadiya, Age:Major, Occ:Business, R/o. 104, Havelock Road, Camp, Belagavi. 1E)Tashid Nahin Kapadiya, Age:Major, Occ:Business, R/o. 104, Havelock Road, Camp, Belagavi. 2.Noshir Tehmuras Kapadiya, Age:71 Years, Occ:Now Nil, R/o. H.No.128, Cambridge Road, South-Phort, Merseyside, England. 3.Bhram Edulji Doongaji, Age:75 Years, Occ:Business, R/o. Common Wealth Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai. (Deleted) 4.Mrs. Coomi Bhram Doongaji, Age:74 Years, Occ:Household, R/o. Common Wealth Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai. 5.Sorab Navalsha Cooper, Age:85 Years, Occ:Nil, R/o. Ruban Apartment,30, Nepean Sea Road, Mumbai. (Deleted) 6.Minu Kaikhashroo Sanjana, Age:87 Years, Occ: Now Nil, R/o. Tulipss 71, Nepean Sea Road, Mumbai. 7.Sherin Themton Daver, Age:Major, Occ:Business, R/o. B.C.No.140, Camp, Belagavi. 8.Khurshid H Wadiya, Age:Major, Occ:Business, R/o. Goolrukh 18, Warli Parade, 83, Warli, Mumbai. (By Shri. A.A.Patil, Advocate for R1A to 1E)2R.A.No.199/2017 R6 & 8 ex parte. R3,5 & 7 are deleted. By R2. & 4 absent. **** ORDER ON I.A. U/OR.23 RULE-1 OF CPC This appeal is preferred against judgment and decree dated 28.07.2017 passed in O.S. No.276/2006 by learned IV Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Belagavi. By way of impugned judgment suit of appellant for the relief of permanent injunction came to be dismissed. The brief facts of plaintiff’s case are as below : 2.Plot No.B4 measuring 6875 square feet situated at Rajaramnagar Belagavi is the suit property. It belonged to deceased P.C.Boyce and Dr. Tehmuras Phirozshah Kapadiya (i.e. father of defendant Nos.1 and 2). Mr P.C.Boyce died issue less executing Will dated 14.07.1998 appointing defendant Nos.6 to 8 as his executors. On the other hand, Dr. Kapadiya executed Will dated 18.08.1977 appointing defendant Nos.3 to 6 as his executors. Defendant No.1 is the Power of Attorney Holder of executors of the Will to administered the properties. Plaintiff- Krishna Pawale (Now deceased, by his L.Rs) claims to be in3
{'Name': 'Macky W/o. Nahin Kapadiya', 'Address': '104, Havelock Road, Camp, Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Azim Feroz Modi', 'Address': 'C/o. Feroz Modi, Helmets, Vengurla Road, Near Hanuman Nagar, Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Nazreen Nahin Kapadiya', 'Address': '104, Havelock Road, Camp, Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Farhad Nahin Kapadiya', 'Address': '104, Havelock Road, Camp, Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Tashid Nahin Kapadiya', 'Address': '104, Havelock Road, Camp, Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Noshir Tehmuras Kapadiya', 'Address': 'H.No.128, Cambridge Road, South-Phort, Merseyside, England', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'Bhram Edulji Doongaji', 'Address': 'Common Wealth Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'Mrs. Coomi Bhram Doongaji', 'Address': 'Common Wealth Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'Sorab Navalsha Cooper', 'Address': 'Ruban Apartment,30, Nepean Sea Road, Mumbai', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'Minu Kaikhashroo Sanjana', 'Address': 'Tulipss 71, Nepean Sea Road, Mumbai', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'Sherin Themton Daver', 'Address': 'B.C.No.140, Camp, Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'Khurshid H Wadiya', 'Address': 'Goolrukh 18, Warli Parade, 83, Warli, Mumbai', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
IN THE COURT OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., AT SRINIVASPURA Dated this 26th day of October 2021 Present : H.R. Devaraju, B.A.LL.B., Prl .Civil Judge and J.M.F.C., Srinivaspura . CMC.No.447/2017 PETITIONER/S: 1.Smt. S. Ashwini W/o G. Janardhana Babu @ Ravana, Aged about 30 years, 2.Master. Kushal S/o G. Janardhana Babu @ Ravana, Aged about 4 years, Minor, 3.Master. Charan Teja S/o G. Janardhana Babu @ Ravana, Aged about 2 years, Minor, Petitioner No.2 and 3 are minors, represented by their natural guardian next friend mother 1st petitioner. All are R/o Janatha Colony, Opp. Government High School, Gownipalli Village & Post, Srinivaspura Taluk, Kolar District. (By Sri. R.R.G., Advocate) ­V/s­ 2 CMC.No.447/2017 RESPONDENT/S: Sri. G. Janardhana Babu @ Ravana S/o Gangaraju .G, Aged about 35 years, R/o Door No.3­120, Bagath Singh Colony, Ambedkar Statue, Punganur Taluk, Chittoor District. (By Sri. K.V.K., Advocate) OR DERS This petition is filed by the petitioners under Section 125 of Cr.P.C., against the respondent for seeking maintenance of Rs.10,000/­ p.m to the 1st petitioner and Rs.5,000/­ p.m to the 2nd and 3rd petitioner each from the date this petition . 2.Brief facts of the petition are as under: That the 1st petitioner is the legally wedded wife of the respondent and their marriage was solemnized on 30.10.2011 near house of the respondent situated at Punganuru Town. At the time of marriage parents of the petitioner have given golden ornaments and Rs.40,000/­ cash to the respondent. After the marriage the 1st petitioner 3 CMC.No.447/2017 and the respondent lived together happily for 7 years. The petitioner No.2 and 3 were born due to their wedlock. The 2nd petitioner is suffering from heart disease, but, respondent has not come with the petitioner to look after him. After the birth of 3rd petitioner the respondent is started to give torture to her and he is started to abuse her in filthy language. The respondent neglected her and refused to maintain her without any reason. Now the petitioner No.1 along with petitioner No.2 and 3 are residing with petitioner No.1’s parents house. They have no independent source of income for their livelihood. The 1St petitioner requires Rs. 10,000/­ towards her maintenance and petitioner No. 2 and 3 require Rs.5,000/­ each per month for their maintenance. The respondent is having immovable and movable assets and he is earning Rs.70,000/­ p.m. In spite of sufficient means he refuses to maintain the petitioners. Hence, prays to allow the petition, as prayed in the petition. 3.Court issued the notice to the respondent. The respondent has put his appearance through his advocate Sri. K.V.K and he has filed detailed objection and he has admitted that 1st petitioner is his wife and petitioner No.2
{'Name': 'Smt. S. Ashwini', 'Address': 'Janatha Colony, Opp. Government High School, Gownipalli Village & Post, Srinivaspura Taluk, Kolar District', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Master. Kushal', 'Address': 'Janatha Colony, Opp. Government High School, Gownipalli Village & Post, Srinivaspura Taluk, Kolar District', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Master. Charan Teja', 'Address': 'Janatha Colony, Opp. Government High School, Gownipalli Village & Post, Srinivaspura Taluk, Kolar District', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Sri. G. Janardhana Babu @ Ravana', 'Address': 'Door No.3-120, Bagath Singh Colony, Ambedkar Statue, Punganur Taluk, Chittoor District', 'Party Name': 'accused'}
KABI500000802017 IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & MACT VI KUDLIGI, SITTING AT SANDUR PRESENT: SRI. NAGESHA K.A. BA.L, LL.B. Senior Civil judge & Member, MACT VI, Kudligi Dated this the 18th day of JUNE, 2022 M.V.C. No. 62/2017 CLAIMANTS 1) Smt. Kori Meenakshamma, W/o Kori Mookabasappa, Aged 47 years, Housewife. 2) Kori Mookabasappa, S/o Kori Shivalingappa, Aged 52 years, Both are R/o 1st Ward, Talur Village, Sandur Taluk, Ballari District. (By Sri. R. Veereshappa, Advocate) V/s RESPONDENTS 1) Abdul Razaak, S/o Murthuja Sab, Aged 36 years, Driver, SRE Bus bearing Reg. No. KA-16-B-9198, 2 M.V.C. No. 62/2017 R/o 2nd Ward, Behind School, Mariyammanahalli Village, Hosapete Taluk, Ballari District. 2) Linga Reddy.B.A., S/o Late Anantha Reddy, Proprietor, SRE Travels and Bus bearing Reg. No. KA-16-B-9198, R/o HPO Road, Chitradurga. 3) The Branch Manager, IFFCO-TOKIO General Insurance Co., Ltd., Raghavendra Complex, K.C. Road, Ballari. 4) Veeranagouda.R., S/o Mallanagouda.R., Aged 40 years, Owner, Maxi Cab bearing Reg. No. KA-34-B-1943, R/o No. 30th Ward, Kuvempu Nagar, Ballari. 5) The Branch Manager, Cholamandalam Insurance Co., Ltd., Upstairs, 24 Hours New Bharathi Medical Stores, Double Road, Ballari. 6) Mr. Mohammed Hussain, S/o Babu Miya, Aged 39 years, Driver, NEKRTC Bearing No. KA-36-F-1319, R/o Gogi Pete-585309, Shahapur Taluk, Yalburga District. 7) The Divisional Controller, NEKRTC, Raichur Division, Raichur. 3 M.V.C. No. 62/2017 (R.1 by Sri Mohamed Haneef, Advocate) (R-3 by Sri Jina Chandra Kumar Gogi, Advocate) (R-5 by Sri. S.N. Muttagi, Advocate) (R-6 by Smt. R. Vasantha Rekha, Advocate) (R.7 by Sri. K. B. Savithri Bai, Advocate) (R-2 & 4 Exparte) JUDGMENT Claimants have filed this claim petition under Section 166 of The Motor Vehicles Act, against the respondents seeking compensation of Rs 22,50,000/- for the death of their daughter Shruthi in the accident dated 30/04/2016. 2.Petition averments in brief is that on 30/04/2016 at 3:30 PM, the deceased and others after completing the interview were returning from Bangalore towards Ballari in the Maxi-Cab bearing Reg. No. KA-34-B-1943. When this vehicle was proceeding on NH-150-A near Sanikere of Challakere Taluk. One Chandregowda was its driver and he drove the same in high speed, rash and negligent manner. At the same time, respondent No.1 being the driver of the bus bearing Reg. No. KA-16-JB-9198 drove the same in high speed, rash and negligent manner and dashed to a KSRTC Bus and thereafter dashed to the Maxi-Cab. As a result of
{'Name': 'Smt. Kori Meenakshamma', 'Address': 'W/o Kori Mookabasappa, Aged 47 years, Housewife, 1st Ward, Talur Village, Sandur Taluk, Ballari District', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Kori Mookabasappa', 'Address': 'S/o Kori Shivalingappa, Aged 52 years, 1st Ward, Talur Village, Sandur Taluk, Ballari District', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Abdul Razaak', 'Address': 'S/o Murthuja Sab, Aged 36 years, Driver, SRE Bus bearing Reg. No. KA-16-B-9198, 2nd Ward, Behind School, Mariyammanahalli Village, Hosapete Taluk, Ballari District', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Abdul Razaak', 'Address': 'S/o Murthuja Sab, Aged 36 years, Driver, SRE Bus bearing Reg. No. KA-16-B-9198, 2nd Ward, Behind School, Mariyammanahalli Village, Hosapete Taluk, Ballari District', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Linga Reddy.B.A.', 'Address': 'S/o Late Anantha Reddy, Proprietor, SRE Travels and Bus bearing Reg. No. KA-16-B-9198, HPO Road, Chitradurga', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'The Branch Manager, IFFCO-TOKIO General Insurance Co., Ltd.', 'Address': 'Raghavendra Complex, K.C. Road, Ballari', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Veeranagouda.R.', 'Address': 'S/o Mallanagouda.R., Aged 40 years, Owner, Maxi Cab bearing Reg. No. KA-34-B-1943, 30th Ward, Kuvempu Nagar, Ballari', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'The Branch Manager, Cholamandalam Insurance Co., Ltd.', 'Address': 'Upstairs, 24 Hours New Bharathi Medical Stores, Double Road, Ballari', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Mr. Mohammed Hussain', 'Address': 'S/o Babu Miya, Aged 39 years, Driver, NEKRTC Bearing No. KA-36-F-1319, Gogi Pete-585309, Shahapur Taluk, Yalburga District', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C., AT HOSANAGARA DATED THIS THE 26th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021 Present:- Smt. Pushpalatha K. B.A.(Law), LL.B., Senior Civil Judge & J.M.F.C., Hosanagar. R.A.No. 06 / 2016 (Old.No.17/2016) Appellant/ Defendant:- 1. Smt. Laxmidevi Died by Lrs 1(a).Smt.Vijaya Kumari W/o Annappa Aged about 60 years Rtd.Teacher Chanakeshava Nagara Shikaripura , Shikaripura Taluk 1(b). Smt.Vedavathi W/o Mahabala Aged about 48 years R.K. Road, Hosanagara 1(c).Smt.Sharadha W/o Rajakumara Aged about 46 years Ppp of Jnanabharathi Kala Grama Mahima Ranganatha Building Muthalahalli Bangalore 1(d).Smt.Lalitha W/o Shivananda Aged about 44 years Ayanuru Village Shivamogga Taluk 2 R.A.02/2019 1(e).Vijendra S/o Nagappa Aged about 43 years Agriculturist Sidihalla, Hirijeni Village Hosanagara Taluk 1(f).Smt.Pushpalatha W/o Rajanarayana Aged about 38 years Kasaragodu Kerala State 2.Raghavendra S/o Ngappa Aged about 42years 3.Sudindra S/o Nagappa Aged 39years Appellant No.2 and 3 are r/o Hirijeni, Hosanagara Taluk 4.Hanumanthappa S/o Duggaiah Aged about 42 years 5.Smt.Shridevi W/o Hanumanthappa Aged about 34 years Appellant No.4 and 5 are r/o Governemnt Hospital Quarters Hosanagara Taluk [By Sri. V.S.K, Advocate] 3 R.A.02/2019 -v/s- Respondent/s Plaintiffs :- Smt.Asha W/o Jijendra House Wife r/o Opposite Shrirama Complex Hosanagara Town. (By Sri. B.S.V, Advocate) Date of institution of appeal : 06.04.2016 Nature of appeal :Appeal filed against the Judgment and decree dated 08.03.2016 in O.S.09/2012 passed by the learned Prl.Civil Judge & JMFC, Hosanagara, wherein the suit was decreed with costs. Judgment pronounced in Appeal : 26.11.2021 Duration of Appeal : Years Months Days 02 10 03 (Pushpalatha K.) Sr. Civil Judge & JMFC, Hosanagar. J U D G E M E N T This is an appeal filed by the defendant in O.S. 09/2012 to set aside judgment and decree dated 08.03.2016 of the
{'Name': 'Smt.Asha', 'Address': 'House Wife, r/o Opposite Shrirama Complex, Hosanagara Town', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Smt.Laxmidevi', 'Address': 'Died by Lrs', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Smt.Vijaya Kumari', 'Address': 'W/o Annappa, Aged about 60 years, Rtd.Teacher, Chanakeshava Nagara, Shikaripura, Shikaripura Taluk', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Smt.Vedavathi', 'Address': 'W/o Mahabala, Aged about 48 years, R.K. Road, Hosanagara', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Smt.Sharadha', 'Address': 'W/o Rajakumara, Aged about 46 years, Ppp of Jnanabharathi Kala Grama, Mahima Ranganatha Building, Muthalahalli Bangalore', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Smt.Lalitha', 'Address': 'W/o Shivananda, Aged about 44 years, Ayanuru Village, Shivamogga Taluk', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Vijendra', 'Address': 'S/o Nagappa, Aged about 43 years, Agriculturist, Sidihalla, Hirijeni Village, Hosanagara Taluk', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Smt.Pushpalatha', 'Address': 'W/o Rajanarayana, Aged about 38 years, Kasaragodu, Kerala State', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Raghavendra', 'Address': 'S/o Ngappa, Aged about 42 years, r/o Hirijeni, Hosanagara Taluk', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Sudindra', 'Address': 'S/o Nagappa, Aged 39 years, r/o Hirijeni, Hosanagara Taluk', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Hanumanthappa', 'Address': 'S/o Duggaiah, Aged about 42 years, r/o Government Hospital Quarters, Hosanagara Taluk', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Smt.Shridevi', 'Address': 'W/o Hanumanthappa, Aged about 34 years, r/o Government Hospital Quarters, Hosanagara Taluk', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Smt.Asha', 'Address': 'W/o Jijendra, House Wife, r/o Opposite Shrirama Complex, Hosanagara Town', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Smt.Laxmidevi', 'Address': 'Died by Lrs', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'Smt.Vijaya Kumari', 'Address': 'W/o Annappa, Aged about 60 years, Rtd.Teacher, Chanakeshava Nagara, Shikaripura, Shikaripura Taluk', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'Smt.Vedavathi', 'Address': 'W/o Mahabala, Aged about 48 years, R.K. Road, Hosanagara', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'Smt.Sharadha', 'Address': 'W/o Rajakumara, Aged about 46 years, Ppp of Jnanabharathi Kala Grama, Mahima Ranganatha Building, Muthalahalli Bangalore', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'Smt.Lalitha', 'Address': 'W/o Shivananda, Aged about 44 years, Ayanuru Village, Shivamogga Taluk', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'Vijendra', 'Address': 'S/o Nagappa, Aged about 43 years, Agriculturist, Sidihalla, Hirijeni Village, Hosanagara Taluk', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'Smt.Pushpalatha', 'Address': 'W/o Rajanarayana, Aged about 38 years, Kasaragodu, Kerala State', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
KABI050014082017 IN THE COURT OF THE II ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C, AT BALLARI. PRESENT : Sri.Chethan Annadani Manjunatha, B.A., LL.M., II Addl.Civil Judge & J.M.F.C., BALLARI. DATED: This the 5 th day of October, 2021 C.C.No.839/2017 Complainant :The Assistant Sub Inspector, Cowl Bazaar Police Station, Ballari. (By A.P.P.) Vs. Accused :Palakshigowda S/o Ayyanagowda, Aged about 37 years, R/o Orvahi Village, Ballari Taluk and District. Present Address: No.1, 8th Main Bandeppa Garden, Muthyala Nagar, Behind, Bengaluru City. (By Sri.L.R.N.,Advocate.,) Nature of Offence/s U/s.355, 448, 504, 506 of IPC. Date of FIR/Private Complaint 01.10.2016 Date on which the recording of evidence commenced05.08.2021 Date of Judgment 05.10.2021 Opinion of the Judge Acquittal2 C.C.No.839/2017 :: J U D G M E N T :: This case emanates from the charge sheet filed by the P.S.I of Cowl Bazaar Police Station against the accused for the alleged offences punishable U/s.355, 448, 504 and 506 of I.P.C., 2. The bird’s eye view of the prosecution case is as follows: It is alleged by the prosecution, that on 01.10.2016, at about 04.30 P.M in the evening, while C.W.1 and 4 were in their house, the accused No.1 criminally trespassed into their house and criminally insulted C.W.1 stating that he has not reconciled his family and suddenly assaulted C.W.1 with a slipper. At that time C.W.5 and 6 came there, stopped the scuffle and sent the accused out of his house. At that time, the accused threw a stone towards C.W.1 and gave a life threat, leading to the registration of First Information Report against the accused. After thorough investigation, the P.S.I of Cowl Bazaar Police station has filed charge sheet against the accused, for the alleged offences stated supra.3 C.C.No.839/2017 3.After filing of the charge sheet, this court took cognizance of the alleged offences and issued process to the accused. The accused appeared before the Court and was enlarged on bail granted by this Court vide order dated on 04.10.2016. 4. The prosecution materials were supplied to the accused in compliance of Sec.207 of Cr.P.C. The accused was heard before charge. Since, there was sufficient grounds for proceeding against the accused, this court framed charge against the accused. The charge was read over and explained to the accused in the language known to him, to which he has pleaded not guilty of the said offences and claimed to be tried, paving way for criminal trial. 5.The prosecution in order to prove its case beyond all reasonable doubt, has examined in all 2 witnesses as PW.1 and PW.2, got marked in all 4 documents as Ex.P.1 to P.4 and closed its side of evidence. 6.Since there was no incriminating evidence appearing against the accused, this court dispensed with the recording of statement of the accused as contemplated U/s. 313 of Cr.P.C.
{'Name': 'The Assistant Sub Inspector', 'Address': 'Cowl Bazaar Police Station, Ballari', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Palakshigowda', 'Address': 'Nan', 'Party Name': 'accused'}
BEFORE THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, AT BENGALURU . DATED THIS THE 10 th DAY OF MARCH 2021 (SCCH­25) Present:Miss.B.T.ANNAPOORNESHWARI B.A., L.L.B., L.L.M. XXI A.C.M.M. & XXIII A.S.C.J ., Bengaluru. MVC No.3849/2017 PETITIONER: Mr.Sukhil, S/o late Linga Reddy, Aged about 27 years, Residing at No.83, “Sri Bramhari” Behind Manipal hospital, BEML 5th Stage, Rajarajeshwari Nagar, Bangalore­98. (By Sri.Samarth Prakash, Advocate.) V/S RESPONDENTS: 1.Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance company Ltd., Represented by its Manager, (Vishranti Melarani Towers No.2319, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, (OMR) Karapakkam, Chennai 600 097) Regional Office at Door No.620, A1, 12th Main, 35th Cross, MVC No.3849/2017 SCCH-25 2nd Block, Rajajinagar, Bangalore 560 010. 2. Mr. Harikumar.S. S/o. Sreedharan Nair.N. Aged Major, Residing at A 1003, Chartered Beverly Hills, Gubbalala Subramanyapura Post, Bangalore 560 061. (Owner of Car bearing No.KA 51 N 564) (R.1 By Ravi S Samprathi , R.2­By Sri.Ajay & Associates Sri. Ajay Kumar Advocate/s.) ....... JUDGMENT The Petitioner has filed this petition under Sec.166 of the M.V. Act., seeking compensation for the injuries sustained by him in a road accident on 12.07.2016. 2.The case of the Petitioner in brief is that, on 12.07.2016 at about 8.15 am the Petitioner was proceeding by riding his motorcycle on Uttarahalli main road. At that time at Kengeri Signal, Ramehalli, Bangalore, all of a sudden a Wagon R2 MVC No.3849/2017 SCCH-25 Car bearing Reg.No.KA­51­N­0564 came with high speed and in a rash and negligent manner, so as to endangering to human life and without heeding to any traffic rules suddenly stopped it without any signal. Though, the Petitioner tried to avoid crash with Car, he could not avoid it as he skid and hit the Car, result of which he fell down and sustained injuries. 3. It is further case of the Petitioner that, immediately after the accident, he was shifted to H.K.Hospital, wherein he was treated and thereafter he was referred to St.John’s hospital, underwent surgeries and discharged with an advise to take follow up treatment. So far, the Petitioner has spent more than Rs.6,00,000/­ towards medical and other allowances. Before the accident, the Petitioner was hale and healthy and working as a Design Engineer at V Rize Industries and earning a sum of Rs.20,000/­ per month. But due to the accidental injuries, the Petitioner is in severe mental shock, agony. The Petitioner has suffered permanent disability. Therefore, the Respondents being the Insurer and the RC owner of the3
{'Name': 'Mr. Sukhil', 'Address': 'No.83, "Sri Bramhari" Behind Manipal hospital, BEML 5th Stage, Rajarajeshwari Nagar, Bangalore\xad98', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance company Ltd.', 'Address': 'Represented by its Manager, Vishranti Melarani Towers No.2319, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Karapakkam, Chennai 600 097', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Mr. Harikumar.S.', 'Address': 'A 1003, Chartered Beverly Hills, Gubbalala Subramanyapura Post, Bangalore 560 061', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance company Ltd.', 'Address': 'Represented by its Manager, Vishranti Melarani Towers No.2319, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Karapakkam, Chennai 600 097', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Mr. Harikumar.S.', 'Address': 'A 1003, Chartered Beverly Hills, Gubbalala Subramanyapura Post, Bangalore 560 061', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}
1 Crl.Misc.No.25667/2021 IN THE COURT OF THE LVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AT MAYO HALL, BENGALURU (CCH-58) Present: Smt. K.G. SHANTHI B.com. LLM. LVII Addl.City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Dated this the 16th day of June, 2021 Crl.Misc.No.25667/2021 Petitioners : 1. 2.Sri. Munesha Venkat, C/o. Giddappa Venkat Aged about 41 years, Smt. Punitha Munesha, C/o Munesha Venkat, Aged about 39 years, Both are R/at. No.106, Tanishka Mansion, Marathahalli, Anand Nagar, Bengaluru North, Marathahalli Colony, Bengaluru-560 037. (By Sri Ganesh C.G. - Advocate) /Vs./ Respondent: State by H.A.L.Police Station, Bengaluru. [By Public Prosecutor] 2 Crl.Misc.No.25667/2021 ORDER ON PETITION u/S. 438 Cr.P.C FILED BY THE PETITIONERS. The respondent-police registered the case against the petitioners in Crime No.95/2021 for the offence punishable U/Ss.506 and 420 IPC. 2. The brief facts of the case is that, the accused borrowed an amount of Rs.45,00,000/- from time-to-time from the complainant and agreed to repay the same within 60 days. But, the accused failed to repay the amount as agreed. Hence, complainant filed a complaint against the accused before respondent police. On receipt of complaint, police have registered a case against the accused/petitioners for the offence punishable u/S.506 and 420 IPC. 3. The Petitioner contended that the FIR is lodged by one of the partners against these Petitioners and there is a considerable delay in filing the complaint. It also contended that there is no ingredients made out that these Petitioners are intended to cheat the complainant. They also contended that they are innocents and not committed any offence. They are ready to abide any of the conditions imposed by this Court. It also contended that they are under the apprehension of arrest3 Crl.Misc.No.25667/2021 by the police. Accordingly, prays to grant anticipatory bail. 4.The Public Prosecutor filed objections stating that if the anticipatory is granted at this stage, the Petitioners will cause hurdle to the investigation and they will tamper the witness of the prosecution. It also contended that there are sufficient material to show that complainant paid money of Rs.45,00,000/- to these Petitioners. Hence, prays to reject the Petition. 5. Arguments heard. Perused the records available before the court. 6. The points arose for my consideration are: 1.Whether the petitioners are entitled for bail u/S. 438 of Cr.P.C.? 2.What order? 7. My findings to the above points are under: Point No.(1) : In the Affirmative Point No.(2): As per final order for the following: REASONS 8. Point No.(1):- The police have registered case
{'Name': 'State by H.A.L.Police Station', 'Address': 'Bengaluru', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Smt. Punitha Munesha,', 'Address': 'No.106, Tanishka Mansion, Marathahalli, Anand Nagar, Bengaluru North, Marathahalli Colony, Bengaluru-560 037', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'State by H.A.L.Police Station', 'Address': 'Bengaluru', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Smt. Punitha Munesha,', 'Address': 'No.106, Tanishka Mansion, Marathahalli, Anand Nagar, Bengaluru North, Marathahalli Colony, Bengaluru-560 037', 'Party Name': 'complainants'}{'Name': 'State by H.A.L.Police Station', 'Address': 'Bengaluru', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
1 Crl.Misc.No.25992/2021 IN THE COURT OF THE LVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AT MAYO HALL, BENGALURU (CCH-58) Present: Smt.K.G.Shanthi, B.Com. LLM., LVII Addl.City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru. Dated this the 13th day of September, 2021. Crl.Misc.No.25992/2021 Petitioners: 1) Sri. Srinivas @ Seena, S/o. Late Narayanaswamy, Aged about 29 years, R/at No.54, 1st Cross, Near Ayyappa Temple, Behind Five Star Bar & Restaurant, Old Madras Road, Byappanahalli, Bangalore. (Accused No.2) 2) Sri. Jayanth @ Papu, D/o. Venkatesh, Aged about 21 years, R/at No.110, 1st Cross, 1st Main, Circle Shop near, Krishnaiah Palya, Old Madras Road, Indiranagar Post, New Byappanahalli, Bengaluru-560 038. (Accused No.4) 3) Sri. Anthony Raj @ Anthony @ Raj, S/o. Michaeal Raj, Aged about 20 years, 2 Crl.Misc.No.25992/2021 R/at 9th Cross, Indiranagar Post, New Byappanahalli, Bengaluru. (Accused No.5) [By Sri. K.N.Pyare Jan, Advocate] Vs. Respondent:State by Krishnarajapura P olice Station, Bengaluru City. [By Public Prosecutor] ORDER ON PETITION u/S. 439 Cr.P.C. The Petitioners filed a petition and pray for grant a bail. 2. It is stated by the petitioners that the Krishnarajapura police registered the case against them and others for the offence punishable u/s 399 & 402 of IPC and Section 25(1-B) (A) of Arms Act in Crime No.244/2021. 3. The brief facts of the complaint that, complainant received credible information that on 25.08.2021 at about 4.00 a.m. the accused persons are planning to commit Dacoity near Old Madras Road, next to Sathya Sai Hospital, White City Layout K.R.Pura, Bengaluru by holding deadly weapons. Hence complainant along with other panchas and police officials went to the spot and surrounded the accused persons and arrested them and produced them before the officer of the respondent-police. 3 Crl.Misc.No.25992/2021 4. The petitioners have stated that they have not committed any offence and they are innocent and police have falsely implicated them for the said offence. It also stated that there is no reasonable ground to believe that they have committed offence. They are ready to abide any terms and conditions imposed by this court and ready to furnish to surety to the satisfaction of this court for due appearance before the court. They undertake that they will cooperate with the IO for investigation. Further stated that the alleged offences are not punishable with death or imprisonment for life. 5. The learned PP filed his objection stating that the petitioners are habitual offenders. It is stated in the objection that if the petitioners are released on bail they will tamper the witnesses of the prosecution and there is a chance of absconding. Accordingly, prays for reject the bail application. 6. Arguments heard. Perused the records available before the court. 7. The points arose for my consideration are:- 1.Whether the petitioners are entitled for bail u/s 439 of Cr.P.C.? 2.What order?
{'Name': 'State', 'Address': 'Krishnarajapura Police Station, Bengaluru City', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Sri. Srinivas', 'Address': 'No.54, 1st Cross, Near Ayyappa Temple, Behind Five Star Bar & Restaurant, Old Madras Road, Byappanahalli, Bangalore', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Sri. Jayanth', 'Address': 'No.110, 1st Cross, 1st Main, Circle Shop near, Krishnaiah Palya, Old Madras Road, Indiranagar Post, New Byappanahalli, Bengaluru-560 038', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Sri. Anthony Raj', 'Address': '9th Cross, Indiranagar Post, New Byappanahalli, Bengaluru', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'State by Krishnarajapura Police Station', 'Address': 'Bengaluru City', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}
BEFORE THE MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIM TRIBUNAL-II, BALL ARI. PRESENT; -SRI KASHIM CHURIKHAN, B.A, LL.M., MEMBER, MACT-XII, BALLARI. DATED THIS 21 st DAY OF NOBEMBER, 2020 M.V.C. NO: 1154/2016 PETIONER: Vishweshwara Gouda, S/o R.Prathap Gouda, aged about 33 years, Private employee and Business, R/o Brahma Shastri compound, Kappagal Road, Ballari. //Vs// RESPONDENTS: 1. Jambayya.H, S/o Shivappa, aged about 30 years, Driver of the Bolero Pick Up bearing Reg. No.KA-34/B-1905, R/o 148, Anjaneya Temple left side, Kanakodas Nagar, Janekunte village, Ballari taluk and District. 2. Santosh, S/o Palakshi, aged about 24 years, owner of the Bolero Pick Up bearing Reg. No.KA-34/B-1905, R/o H.No.1722/7, Guru Krupa Colony, Patel Nagar, Ballari. 3. The Branch Manager, ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd., Ballari. CLAIM : Petitioner has filed the Petition U/s.166 of the Motor VehiclesAct,1989 Praying to award compensation of Rs .25,00,000/- with costs and interest at the rate of 24% p.a. from the date of accident till the date of realization against the r espondents who had sustained injuries, in an accident, which took place on 09-02-2016 at about 09.40.p.m., S.P.Cirle, Opp. BJP office, Ba llari, due to rash and negligent driving by the 1 st respondent driver of the Bolero Pickup bearing Reg. No.KA-34/B-1905, Respondent No. 1 being the M.V.C. No.1154/2018 2 driver, Respondent No.2 being the owner and Responde nt No.3 being the insurer of the said vehicle Cause of action arose on : 09-02-2016 Application filed on : 21-10-2016 Court Fee paid : Rs.10/- DECREETAL ORDER: This Petition coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri.H.Manjunath, Advocate for the claim petitioner and Sri.D.Mallaiah, Advocate for Respondent No.1 and 2 and Sri. A.Mahammed Ghouse, advocate for Respondent No.3, after perusing the material pa pers placed on record and upon hearing the arguments on both sides . This Tribunal doth order and award that, the petitio n U/Sec. 166 of M.V. Act is partly allowed with costs. It is further ordered and decreed that, the petitio ner is entitled for compensation amount Rs.4,21,650/- (Rupees Four lakh twenty one thousand six hundred and fifty only) along with interest at the rate of 7% per annum from date of pe tition till entire amount is deposited from respondent No. 2 and 3. It is further ordered and decreed that, the respond ent No.3 shall deposit the compensation amount together with interest within 60 days from the date of this order in the sc hedule bank in account of petitioner after obtaining particulars o f the bank from petitioner. Bank authority shall release 50% compens ation M.V.C. No.1154/2018 3 awarded amount and remaining 50% shall keep in Fixed Deposit for a period of 3 years in the name of petitioner. It is further ordered and awarded that, the responde nts do pay to the petitioner a sum of Rs .1196 /- towards costs. Given under my hand and seal of this Court, on this 21 st day of November 2020. Member, MACT-XII, Ballari. MEMORANDUM OF COSTS By the Petr. Rs. By Respt No.1& 2 Rs. By Respt No.3 Rs. Court Fee for Petition 10-00 - Court Fee for Vakalath 01-00 01-00 01-00 Court Fee for Process 85-00 -- -- Paper Publication Charges --- -- Advocate’s Fee 1000-00 ( FCM not filed) (FCM not filed) Typing Charges 100-00 -- -- Total 1196-00 01-00 01-00 Award Drafted on 28-11-2020 Award Signed on 30-11-2020 Member, MACT-XII, Ballari.
{'Name': 'Vishweshwara Gouda', 'Address': 'Brahma Shastri compound, Kappagal Road, Ballari', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Jambayya.H', 'Address': '148, Anjaneya Temple left side, Kanakodas Nagar, Janekunte village, Ballari taluk and District', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Santosh', 'Address': 'H.No.1722/7, Guru Krupa Colony, Patel Nagar, Ballari', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Jambayya.H', 'Address': '148, Anjaneya Temple left side, Kanakodas Nagar, Janekunte village, Ballari taluk and District', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Santosh', 'Address': 'H.No.1722/7, Guru Krupa Colony, Patel Nagar, Ballari', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'The Branch Manager, ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd.', 'Address': 'Ballari', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}
KABG400006582017 BEFORE THE ADDITIONAL MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL AND PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT CHIKODI DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF MAY 2022 : P R E S E N T : SRI. T.SRIKANTH, B.A.L.,LL.B., MEMBER, ADDITIONAL M.A.C.T., & PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, CHIKODI. MVC.NO.2373/2017 C/W MVC.NO.2374/2017 & MVC .NO.2375/2017 BETWEEN: IN MVC NO.2373/2017 : SRI FARUKH ALLABAX MULLA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O ABDUL LAT, SHIROL TALUK, KOLHAPUR DISTRICT, MAHARASTRA STATE. PETITIONER (BY SRI D.M.BAGI., ADVOC ATE) IN MVC NO.2374/2017 : SMT NAFIZA W/O FARUKH MULLA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O ABDUL LAT, SHIROL TALUK, KOLHAPUR DISTRICT, MAHARASTRA STATE. PETITIONER (BY SRI D.M.BAGI., ADVOCATE) IN MVC NO.2375/2017 : KUM. JUNED S/O FARUKH MULLA, AGED AB OUT 06 YEARS. SINCE MINOR REP. BY HIS MINOR GUARDIAN & NATURAL FATHER SRI FARUKH ALLABAX MULLA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, MVC.No. 2373 +2374 +2375 /2017 2 COOLIE, R/O ABDUL LAT, SHIROL TALUK, KOLHAPUR DISTRICT, MAHARASTRA STATE. PETITIONER (BY SRI D.M.BAGI., ADVOCATE) AND : IN ALL THE CASES: 1. SRI GOPAL YALLAPPA KITTUR, MAJOR, BUSINESS, R/O RUKMINI NAGAR, KOLHAPUR TALUK AND DISTRICT, MAHARASTRA STATE. 2. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., MARUTI GALLI, BELAGAVI TALUK & DISTRICT. RESPONDENTS (R-1 EX -PARTE) (R-2 BY SRI V.S.DUGANI., ADVOCATE) (T.SRIKANTH) Member, Addl. M.A.C.T., & Prl. Senior Civil Judge, Chikodi. -o0o- MVC.No. 2373 +2374 +2375 /2017 3 : COMMON JUDGMENT : All these petitions are c lubbed together, as they arise out of an accident dated 26/06/2017 . All these petitions are filed under Sec.166 of Indian Motor Vehicles Act claiming compensation of Rs.15,00,000 =00 Rs.6,00,000=00 and Rs.1 0,00,000=00 respectively , with interest at the rat e of 18% per annum from the date of the petition till realization , for the injuries sustained by the respective petitioners in the above said motor vehicle accident. 2. It is the case of petitioner s that on 26/06/2017 at about 7.00 p.m., when the y were pr oceeding from Ichalkaranji towards Abdul Lat , in Motor Cycle bearing registration No.MH -09-DL-7609 , on Ichalkaranji - Shiradwad R oad, near ‘Sairat & Samarth ’ Dabha, within the limits of Shiradwad Village , the driver of Mahindra Pickup vehicle bearing registr ation No.MH -09-BC-3060, the (for short ‘the Vehicle’) drove the same in a rash and negligent manner , lost control of the same and dashed to petitioners’ motor cycle from opposite direction and
{'Name': 'SRI FARUKH ALLABAX MULLA', 'Address': 'ABDUL LAT, SHIROL TALUK, KOLHAPUR DISTRICT, MAHARASTRA STATE', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'SMT NAFIZA W/O FARUKH MULLA', 'Address': 'ABDUL LAT, SHIROL TALUK, KOLHAPUR DISTRICT, MAHARASTRA STATE', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'KUM. JUNED S/O FARUKH MULLA', 'Address': 'ABDUL LAT, SHIROL TALUK, KOLHAPUR DISTRICT, MAHARASTRA STATE', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'SRI GOPAL YALLAPPA KITTUR', 'Address': 'RUKMINI NAGAR, KOLHAPUR TALUK AND DISTRICT, MAHARASTRA STATE', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER', 'Address': 'UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., MARUTI GALLI, BELAGAVI TALUK & DISTRICT', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}
SC No. 102/2017 Plaintiff, defendant-1 and 2 along with their respective counsels present, filed compromise petition under Order-23 Rule-3 R/w Section 151 of CPC. On enquiry it is submitted that, the plaintiff and defendants are acquainted with each other. Defendants for family necessities borrowed Rs.40,000/- from plaintiff on 22.12.2012 in the presence of witnesses and havejointly executed promissory note, thereby agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a. As defendants have failed to repay the amount as agreed with interest the suit came to be filed. Now by the intervention of elders of village, they have amicably settled their dispute that, defendants shall pay Rs.65,000/- to plaintiff within 2 months i.e., before 1.2.2022. On their failure plaintiff is at liberty to file execution proceedings for suit claim. Accordingly, filed compromise petition. The contents of compromise petition are read over to the parties, they have agreed with free consent and submitted that, without any undue influence or misrepresentation, they haveagreed to receive the share allotted to them by the elders. Accordingly compromise petition is accepted. Office is directed to draw decree in terms of compromise petition. In view of the compromise entered between the parties office is directed to refund entire court fee to plaintiff after thorough identification. Prl.Sr.Civil Judge & CJM, Ballari.
{'Name': 'xxxx', 'Address': 'xxxx', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'xxxx', 'Address': 'xxxx', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'xxxx', 'Address': 'xxxx', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'xxxx', 'Address': 'xxxx', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'xxxx', 'Address': 'xxxx', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'xxxx', 'Address': 'xxxx', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'xxxx', 'Address': 'xxxx', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}
Learned counsel for petitioner is present. Both parties have filed joint memo on 03.09.2021. On perusal of the same, it is seen that parties have settled the matter for a total sum of Rs.8,38,925/. In joint memo both parties submitted that the respondent insurance company has already deposited Rs.5,38,925/­ before Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in MFA No.4449/2016 vide cheque no 586809 dated 04.08.2016. Learend counsel for the petitioner filed memo and prays to release the entire compensation amount to petitioner NO.1 by name B Chandabasha alias B Shanbasha. Learned counsel for the respondent filed memo and submits no objections to release the entire amount with accrued interest to the petitioner No.1. Perused the joint memo. Joint memo is accepted. Petition is allowed in terms of joint memo. Second respondent is directed to deposit the award amount(remaining amount of Rs.3,00,000/­) within One month from date this order. Petitioner is directed to furnish Bank/NEFT details in the office. On deposit, entire amount shall be released to the petitioner through E­payment and as per rules. Office is directed to draw an award accordingly. The joint memo shall form part and parcel of the award. XII Addl. SCJ & ACMM
{'Name': 'B Chandabasha alias B Shanbasha', 'Address': 'xxxx', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'insurance company', 'Address': 'xxxx', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}
BEFORE THE EMPLOYEES STATE INSUANCE COURT AT BANGALORE Dated this 09 th day of September, 2021. Present :- Sri.H.C.Shamprasad., B. A, LL.B., ….JUDGE. E.S.I. APPLICATION NO.54/2016 M/s.Bhuwalka Steel Industries Limited, ‘bhuwalka Centre, No.71, III cross, Residency Road, Bengaluru 25 . ...APPLICANT ( By Sri.K.R.Anand., Advocate) Vs 1. The Deputy Director, ESI Corporation, Panchadeep Bhavan, No.10, Binnypet, Bangalore 23 2. The Recovery Officer, ESI Corporation, Panchadeep Bhavan, No.10, Binnypet, Bangalore 23 ….RESPONDENT (By Sri.N.S.Narasimha Swamy., Advocate) * * * * * * * O R D E R The present application filed by the applicant compan y under Section 75 & 76 of ESI Act, by challenging the o rders dated 13.01.2016, at Annexure-C, as the applicant comp any is 2 not liable to pay any amount towards interest as claime d by the respondent corporation. The applicant company has also expressed its own reasons regarding running the factory w ith lower margin of the orders and also incurring huge loss . Inspite of that, the applicant company has remitted the subscription towards coverable employees. Because, of ther e was delay in remitting the contribution, the responden t corporation has issued notices under Section C-18 as well as C- 19, which is unsustainable. 2. The respondent has denied the allegations and brought to the notice that it was the obligation on the part of the applicant company to remit the contribution withi n 21 days. If there was any inordinate delay in remitting the a mount as per Section 39(5), interest could be recovered. The re spondent corporation has also brought to the notice of the provi sion under Section 40(1) r/w.Section 43 of ESI Act as they m andate the employer to make payment of contribution within prescribed time limit. Finally, it has stated that, it was willful default on the part of the applicant company in non- remitting the contribution in time. Hence, notices as per C-18 t hen C-19 notice issued to recover Rs.13,94,732/-. 3 4. In this case, issues has also framed by my learned Predecessor as under; 1) Whether the applicant proves that the C- 19 notice dated 13.01.2016 at Annexure- C issued by the respondent corporation claiming interest of Rs.13,94,732/- for the wage period from 10/2013 to 03/2015 is not sustainable and liable to be set aside? 2) What order the parties are entitled to? 5. When the case was posted for cross examination of AW1, both the counsels brought to the notice as the matt er was pending before the NCLT, Bangalore Branch. Thereaft er, they took several adjournments to submit the order. Counsel for the respondent has produced order copy of NCLT, dated 04.09.2021 as it was filed by M/s.Indu Corporation Pri vate Limited, resolution Professional for M/s.Bhuwalka Steel s Industries Limited., Bandapura village, Bengaluru. B ut, the ESI corporation was not a party in the said proceedings. Th en, the case was posted for hearing both the parties agreed to d ispose of the case in view of the orders passed by the NCLT. 6. The respondent counsel submits on 04.09.2021 that in view of the order passed by the NCLT, the present appl ication will not survive. Otherside, has also submitted to pa ss the order as the present case is not sustainable under law. This
{'Name': 'M/s.Bhuwalka Steel Industries Limited', 'Address': 'bhuwalka Centre, No.71, III cross, Residency Road, Bengaluru 25', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'The Deputy Director', 'Address': 'Panchadeep Bhavan, No.10, Binnypet, Bangalore 23', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'The Recovery Officer', 'Address': 'Panchadeep Bhavan, No.10, Binnypet, Bangalore 23', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'The Deputy Director', 'Address': 'Panchadeep Bhavan, No.10, Binnypet, Bangalore 23', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'The Recovery Officer', 'Address': 'Panchadeep Bhavan, No.10, Binnypet, Bangalore 23', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}
KAKL600001362017 Presented on : 07-01-2017 Registered on : 07-01-2017 Decided on : 17-04-2021 Duration : 4 years, 3 months, 10 days IN THE COURT OF Prl Civil Judge and JMFC,Srinivaspur AT Srinivaspur,KOLAR (Presided Over by Sri. Devaraju H.R. ) C.C./7/2017 Exhibit No. Complainant(PROSECUTION): Chandrappa Through Police Station Officer , R/o.Ambedkar Palya, Srinivaspur Town. SrinivaspurKOLAR Chandrappa VERSUS Accused: Raheem Age: 25 Occupation : R/o.Gaffar Khan Mohalla, Srinivaspur Town. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- APP for State Complainant}: P.C. Narayanaswamy, Advocate for appearing for Raheem Advocate appearing for , respectively. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Offence punishable under : 138NIACT of Under Section 200 CRPC, of , of , of , JUDGMENT (Delivered on 17-04-2021) ORDER Accused is present. Both the parties have jointly filed an application U/s. 147 of N.I Act. As per the compromise between the parteis. Accused has agreed to pay Rs.30,000/- to the complainant as full and final settlement of the cheque amount. today accused has paid R.s30,000/- to the counsel for the complainant as full and final settlement amount from the accused on behalf of the complainant. I have not found any undue influence, coercion, fraud between the parties. In view of compromise petition filed by the both parties, case is closed as per the terms and conditions of the compromise petition. Consequently accused is acquitted for the offence punishable under section 138 of N.I Act. Date : 17-04-2021 (Sri. Devaraju H.R. ) Prl Civil Judge and JMFC,Srinivaspur Visit ecourts.gov.in for updates or download mobile app “ eCourts Services ” from Android or iOS
{'Name': 'Chandrappa', 'Address': 'Ambedkar Palya, Srinivaspur Town, Srinivaspur, Kolar', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Raheem', 'Address': 'Gaffar Khan Mohalla, Srinivaspur Town, Srinivaspur, Kolar', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Chandrappa', 'Address': 'Ambedkar Palya, Srinivaspur Town, Srinivaspur, Kolar', 'Party Name': 'complainants'}{'Name': 'Raheem', 'Address': 'Gaffar Khan Mohalla, Srinivaspur Town, Srinivaspur, Kolar', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
1Crl.Misc.No.25971/2021 ORDER The Petitioner approached this Court under Section 438 of Cr.P .C., seeking anticipatory bail against the Respondents contending that one. Mrs. Pavithra Karthik is likelihood of lodging complaint against him with respect to monitory transaction. The Petitioner apprehends chance of his arrest by Respondent Police. 2. The Learned PP apposed the bail application contending that till this day, they have not received any complaint nor registered any FIR. Hence, the Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P .C., is not maintainable. 3. Heard. Perused the records. 4. The Point that arise for consideration is: “Whether the Petition is maintainable?” 5. Before taking the case on merits, it is appropriate to have a look at the provision of Section 438 of Cr.P.C.: 438. Direction for grant of bail to person apprehending arrest. (1) When any person has reason to believe that he2Crl.Misc.No.25971/2021 may be arrested on an accusation of having committed a non-bailable offence, he may apply to the High Court or the Court of Session for a direction under this section ; and that Court may, if it thinks fit, direct that in the event of such arrest, he shall be released on bail. (2) When the High Court or the Court of Session makes a direction under sub-section (1), it may include such conditions in such directions in the light of the facts of the particular case, as it may think fit, including- (i) a condition that the person shall make himself avail for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) a condition that the person shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; (iii) a condition that the person shall not leave without the previous permission of the Court ; India (iv) such other condition as may be imposed under sub-section (3) of section 437, as if the bail were granted under that section. (3) If such person is thereafter arrested without warrant by an officer in charge of a police station on such accusation, and is prepared either at the time of3Crl.Misc.No.25971/2021 arrest or at any time while in the custody of such officer to give bail, be shall be released on bail; and if a Magistrate taking cognizance of such offence decides that a warrant should issue in the first instance against that person, he shall issue a bailable warrant in conformity with the direction of the Court under sub- section (1). On careful perusal of the very opening sentence of the said act, it clearly indicates that “Whether any person has reason to believe that he may be arrested on an accusation of having committed a non-bailable offence.” This fact clearly indicates that there must be a reason to believe that a person may be arrested. But, here in the present case, admittedly till this day, no complaint is lodged. Rather, even according to the Petitioner there is a monitory transaction between Mrs.Pavithra Karthik and the Petitioner wherein Petitioner claim that he has issued signed empty e- stamp papers and signed empty on demand pro-note to facilitate loan to improve their business and the said Mrs. Pavithra Karthik issued legal notice demanding Rs.5,00,000/- from the Petitioner etc. Admittedly, till
{'Name': 'Mrs. Pavithra Karthik', 'Address': 'xxxx', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'xxxx', 'Address': 'xxxx', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'xxxx', 'Address': 'xxxx', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'xxxx', 'Address': 'xxxx', 'Party Name': 'complainants'}{'Name': 'xxxx', 'Address': 'xxxx', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
1 E.P No.24 of 2017 IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & CJM, BELAGAVI, AT BELAGAVI :PRESENT: Shri. Parashuram F. Doddamani, B.A., LL.M., Principal Senior Civil Judge & CJM, Belagavi. Dated: This the 10 th Day of March 2021: Execution Petition No. 24 of 2017 : Between: 1.Shri. Mallappa S/o Bhimrai Joi, 2.Shri. Shivaji S/o Bhimrai Joi, 3.Shri. Pappanna S/o Bhimrai Joi, All are Major, Occupation: Agriculturists, R/o: Sambra, Tq & District: Belagavi. …Decree Holders. (By Sri. B.S. Dhaded, Advocate). And: 1.The Assistant Commissioner, Belagavi Sub­Division, Belagavi, And Land Acquisition Officer for Sambra, Aerodrome, Belagavi, Tq & Dist: Belagavi. 2.Airport Incharge, Airport Authority of India, Airport, Sambra, Belagavi, Tq & Dist: Belagavi. …Respondents. (By Sri. D.G.P. for J.Dr No.1). (By Sri. M.R. Kulkarni, Adv, for J.Dr.No.2).2 E.P No.24 of 2017 Orders on Calculation Memos: The decree holders have filed the petition U/Order XXI Rule 11 of CPC to execute the Judgment & Award passed by this Court in LAC No.46/2008, dated 26­09­2016 to recover the amount of Rs.59,74,272/­ from the judgment debtors. 2.The judgment debtors have appered through learned District Government Pleader & filed objections by denying the claim of the decree holders. However, during the pendency of the petition, the judgment debtors have deposited for a sum of Rs.32,64,300/­ & which is kept in CCD No.480/2017­18, dated 23­02­ 2018 as per R.O.No.0662814 and this court has already released the said sum in favour of decree holders on 07­04­2018 through crossed account payee cheque dated 17­04­2018. 3.The decree holders have filed the fresh memo of calculation dated 15­01­2021, which is as under: Memo of Calculation 01LAQ/SR No.1661 02LAC No.46/2008 03Date of 4 (1) Notification.23-11-2006 04Date of Award 08-04-2008. 05R.S.No.218/1. 06Extent of acquired land.1.16-gunthas. 07Award amount paid per acre.Rs.75,000/- 08Amount due. 42,15,333.003 E.P No.24 of 2017 Calculation Sheet Sl. No.Particulars Amount Rs. Ps.Amount Rs. Ps. I. Total enhanced Market Value of land @ Rs.33,600/- for 56 gunthas.18,81,600.00 II. Less paid by the LAO @ Rs.75,000/- per acre for 56-Guntas1,05,000.00 Balance Rs. 17,76,600.00 III. 30% Solatium on enhanced market value on Rs. 17,76,600.005,32,980.00 IV. 12% Addl.M.V. from 23-11-2006 to 08-04-2008 (500 days).2,92,043.00 Balance Rs. 26,01,623.00 V. Interest @ 9% p.a. from 08-04-2008 to 07-04-2009 on Rs.26,01,623.002,34,146.00 VI. Interest @ 15% p.a. from 07-04-2009 to 21-02-2018 (3271 days) on Rs.26,01,623.0034,97,222.00 Total Interest Amount. 37,31,368.00 VII Less paid by LAO on 22-02-2018 was adjusted in the interest.32,64,300.00 Balance Interest. 4,67,068.00 VIII Further interest at 15% p.a. from 23- 02-2018 to 17-09-2018 (572 days).6,11,559.00 Total - 10,78,627.00 IX Cost awarded by LA.O. 503.00. Total Interest due as on today from Judgment Debtors.16,13,207.00 X Further interest at 15% p.a. from 18- 09-2019 to 01-02-2021 for 500 days.5,34,580.00 Total amount due as on today from Judgment Debtor including principal, cost & interest42,15,333.00 16,13,207.00 4. Per contra, t he Judgment Debtor No.1 has also filed calculation memo, dated 20­02­2021 through learned District Government Pleader, as under:
{'Name': 'The Assistant Commissioner', 'Address': 'Belagavi Sub\xadDivision, Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Airport Incharge', 'Address': 'Airport Authority of India, Airport, Sambra, Belagavi, Tq & Dist: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'The Assistant Commissioner', 'Address': 'Belagavi Sub\xadDivision, Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Airport Incharge', 'Address': 'Airport Authority of India, Airport, Sambra, Belagavi, Tq & Dist: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}
IN THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & AMACT, ARSIKERE PRESENT : Smt. NIRMALA K. B.A., M.L., Senior Civil Judge & AMACT, Arsikere. DATED ON THIS 29 th DAY OF MARCH, 2021 M.V.C.No.2000/2013 Petitioner : Asha W/o Lokesha, Aged about 25 years, R/o Adihalli Village, Gandsi Hobli, Arsikere Taluk, Hassan District. (By Sri R.L., Advocate) -V/s- Respondents: 1) Ramachandramurthy S/o Narayanaswamy, Aged about 45 years, BSNL Lineman, R/o Kartikere Village & Post, Kasaba Hobli, Chikmagalur Taluk. (Owner of Bike bearing Reg.No.KA.18/U-4253) 2) The Manager, The Oriental Insurance Co., Ltd., P.B. No.68, Nagnirmal Complex, 1st Floor, Opp: Ranganna Choultry, Basavanahalli Main road, Chikmagalur-577101. (Policy No.472602/31/2013/9030, valid from 24.1.2013 to 23.1.2014) (R-1 by Sri A.S.P., Advocate) (R-2 by Sri K.M.S., Advocate)MVC.2000/2013 2 J U D G E M E N T This claim petition is filed by the petitioner U/s 166 of MV Act claiming compensation for the injuries sustained by the petitioner in the motor vehicle accident. 2. In brief, the petitioner case are summarized as under:- It is the case of the petitioner that on 3.4.2013 at about 3.15 p.m. in the afternoon petitioner was waiting f or Auto in the bus stand to go to Bageshapura-Adihalli on Arsikere -Hassan road, at that time from Hassan a Bajaj motorbike bearing Reg.No.KA.18/U-4253 came towards Arsikere and gave lift to petitioner and as a pillion rider he was coming on Arsikere-Hassan road, near Bageshapura it fell to ditch as he was r iding the bike in a rash and negligent manner and caused the accident . Due to said accident, the petitioner had sustained grievous injuries all over the body and immediately, she was taken to Government Hospital, Arsikere and then she was shif ted to Government Hospital, Hassan for higher treatment. Further, she was referred to Mangalore Hospital for higher treat ment. and got admitted as inpatient and undergone operation. Pet itioner has spent Rs.1,00,000/- towards medical expenses and al so spent huge amount towards attendant, food, nourishment an d incidental charges. Still, petitioner requires amount towards future treatment on the injuries. Petitioner submits that she was hale and healthy prior to the accident and she was only the bread earner of the family. She was doing agriculture and also pet ty shop business and earning Rs.5,000/- per month. Now unf ortunately, due to the said grievous injuries she became perman ently disabled and unable to do her work and hence, there is loss of income to MVC.2000/2013 3 herself and to her family due to the said accident. Further, the petitioner submits that in view of the accidental i njuries sustained by her, she has sustained pain and sufferings. She has incurred expenses towards food, nourishment and medical expe nses. She requires some more money towards the future medical expenses. Since she was undertaking treatment, there was loss of income during the period of hospitalization. Since the ac cident has taken place due to the rash and negligent driving of driv er of offending vehicle, the petitioner contend that both the respo ndents are jointly and severally liable to pay compensation to the petitioner at the rate of Rs.2,00,000/- with interest from the da te of petition till realization. 3. On the other hand, after issuance of notice, the 1 st respondent being the owner of offending vehicle tho ugh served with Court notice and appeared through the Advocate, fai led to file the written statement. 4. On the other hand, 2 nd respondent being the insurer of offending vehicle entered appearance through their Advocate and filed their objection statement denying the age, av ocation, earnings, accidental injuries and the treatment tak en by the petitioner and further deny the manner of accident as narrated by her and claim their discharge from the liability on the ground that the rider of bike was not holding valid and effecti ve driving licence as on the date of accident and thereby violated the terms and conditions of the Insurance policy, for which the 2nd respondent is not liable to pay compensation to the petitioner. Further, they submit that the compensation claimed by the petitio ner is excessive and exorbitant one and hence, prays for d ismissal of the said petition against them.
{'Name': 'Asha', 'Address': 'Adihalli Village, Gandsi Hobli, Arsikere Taluk, Hassan District', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Ramachandramurthy', 'Address': 'Kartikere Village & Post, Kasaba Hobli, Chikmagalur Taluk', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Ramachandramurthy', 'Address': 'Kartikere Village & Post, Kasaba Hobli, Chikmagalur Taluk', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'The Manager', 'Address': 'P.B. No.68, Nagnirmal Complex, 1st Floor, Opp: Ranganna Choultry, Basavanahalli Main road, Chikmagalur-577101', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}
KAKL020008912017 IN THE COURT OF PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT KOLAR Present: Sri. Balachandra N. Bhat, Bsc. LLB, PGDHRL Prl. Senior Civil Judge & CJM., Kolar Dated this the 29th day of July 2022 O.S.153/2017 Plaintiff: Sri. P. Ashok, S/o Gopalakrishnaiah Shetty, Aged about 53 years, R/at New Extension, Kolar – 563 101. (R/by Sri. M. Munegowda – Adv.) V/s Defendants:1)Sri. Mohammed Yosuf Sheriff @ Mohammed Yusuf, S/o C. Nazeerulla Shariff, Aged about 38 years, R/at China Garden, Benson Town, Bangalore – 560 046. 2)Sri. Nazar Ali Khan, S/o late Sardar Khan, Aged about 47 years, R/at No.53, Sulthan Thippasandra, Mahalakshmi Layout, Kolar City. (Exparte) O.S.153/2017 Date of institution of the suit 30­05­2017 Nature of Suit Specific Performance of Contract Date of commencement of Trial 18­06­2019 Date on which the Judgment was pronounced29­07­2022 Duration of suit Year/s Month/s Day/s 05 01 29 Sd/­ (Balachandra N. Bhat) Prl. Senior Civil Judge & CJM, Kolar J U D G M E N T The suit is filed by the plaintiff against the defendants for specific performance of the contract for sale of suit schedule property based on agreement of sale dated 04­02­2013, declaration that the sale deed dated 26.11.2014 executed by 1st defendant in favour of the 2nd defendant as null and void, costs and such other relief. 2) The property is as described herein below to be hereinafter referred to as the suit schedule property: Sl. No. Sy.No.Measurement A – GSituated at 1) 22/2 19 Guntas Talagunda Village, Vokkaleri Hobli, Kolar Taluk. 2 O.S.153/2017 2) 22/3 16 guntas Talagunda Village, Vokkaleri Hobli, Kolar Taluk. 3) 22/4 25 guntas Talagunda Village, Vokkaleri Hobli, Kolar Taluk. 3) The case of the plaintiff in nut shell could be summarised as follows; The defendant No.1 is the absolute owner of the suit schedule property who is said to have approached the plaintiff offering to sell the suit schedule property. After the negotiations the first defendant is said to have entered into a contract with the plaintiff to sell the suit schedule property for Rs.6,00,000­00 (Rupees Six Lakhs only) and executed an unregistered agreement of sale on 04.02.2013 in favour of the plaintiff. The plaintiff claims to have tendered Rs.5,00,000­00 as advance by way of cash on the date of the agreement. The first defendant is said to have agreed to execute a sale deed in favour of the plaintiff by receiving balance consideration amount of Rs.1,00,000­00 within one year. 4) The plaintiff has further pleaded that the first defendant is alleged to have not come forward to execute the sale deed. The plaintiff claims to have3
{'Name': 'Sri. P. Ashok', 'Address': 'R/at New Extension, Kolar – 563 101.', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Sri. Mohammed Yosuf Sheriff @ Mohammed Yusuf', 'Address': 'R/at China Garden, Benson Town, Bangalore – 560 046.', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'Sri. Nazar Ali Khan', 'Address': 'R/at No.53, Sulthan Thippasandra, Mahalakshmi Layout, Kolar City.', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
1 LAC No.s 756/17 & 757/17 IN THE COURT OF I ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, BELAGAVI AND THE LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION & RESETTLEMENT AUTHORITY, BELAGAVI DATED: This the 8th day of October, 2021 PRESENT SRI. BASAVARAJ B.Com., LL.M. I ADDL. DIST. & SESSIONS JUDGE, AND THE LAR & RA, BELAGAVI LA C No.s 756/17 & 757/17 BETWEEN: 1) Honnappa Mallappa Padasalagi, 65 years, Agriculture, R/o Athani Tq Athani Dt Belagavi …Claimant/s in LAC No.756/17 1) Gourawwa Sadashiv Padasalagi, Age 50 R/o Athani Tq Athani Dt Belagavi 2) Ashok Sadashiv Padasalagi, age 38 yrs R/o Athani Tq Athani Dt Belagavi 3) Shrinivas Sadashiv Padasalagi, age 36 yrs R/o Athani Tq Athani Dt Belagavi 4) Shekar Sadashiv Padasalagi, age 34 yrs R/o Athani, Tq Athani, Dt Belagavi 5) Ishawar Sadashiv Padasalagi, age 32 yrs R/o Athani Tq Athani Dt Belagavi …Claimant/s in LAC No.757/17 (By Sri SH Shedshyal, Adv.) AND: 1. The S.L.A.O. Hipparagi Project, Athani.2 LAC No.s 756/17 & 757/17 2. The Executive Engineer, K.N.N.L., Athani. 3. The Deputy Commissioner, Rept. by the State …Respondent/s (R­1 By DGP, R­2 by Sri S N Goudar, Adv.) C O M M O N J U D G M E N T These are the references made by the respondent no.1 (hereinafter referred as 'SLAO') for acquiring the lands for formation of East Canal of the Karimasuti Lift Irrigation under Hipparagi Barriage Project u/s 64 of The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred as 'RFCTLARR Act, 2013') for enhancement of compensation with reference to the publishing preliminary notification in the Karnataka Gazette on 16.2.2012 and the same are registered in the above LAC Numbers. 2. As these reference applications are arising out of the same preliminary notification and hence, the another LAC Case is clubbed with LAC No. 756/2017 and common evidence was recorded and taken for common judgment. 3 LAC No.s 756/17 & 757/17 3. Admittedly, the SLAO acquired the lands of the claimants which are as under: LAC NO.sSy No.VillageA ­ G 756/2017257/2 255/1Athani00 ­ 12 00 ­ 07 757/2017255/2 255/3Athani00 – 07 00 ­ 01 and awarded the compensation amount of Rs.92,628/­ per acre by treating the same as dry lands . 4.Being aggrieved by the award passed by the SLAO, the claimants made protest application u/s 64 of the RFCTLARR Act, 2013 for making reference to the authority similarly contending that the award has been passed without giving any opportunity to the claimants to participate at any stage of the acquisition proceedings. The acquired lands consists of rich valuable soil. The claimants growing irrigated crops like sugarcane with the help of pipeline from Krishna River, well and bore well fetching a net agricultural income of Rs. 5,00,000/­ per acre and entitled for compensation on the basis of capitalization method and the value of the lands is Rs. 25,00,000/­ per acre. The claimants also growing two allied irrigated crops in a year which are Soyabeen, Turmeric,
{'Name': 'Honnappa Mallappa Padasalagi', 'Address': 'R/o Athani Tq Athani Dt Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Gourawwa Sadashiv Padasalagi', 'Address': 'R/o Athani Tq Athani Dt Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Ashok Sadashiv Padasalagi', 'Address': 'R/o Athani Tq Athani Dt Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Shrinivas Sadashiv Padasalagi', 'Address': 'R/o Athani Tq Athani Dt Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Shekar Sadashiv Padasalagi', 'Address': 'R/o Athani, Tq Athani, Dt Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Ishawar Sadashiv Padasalagi', 'Address': 'R/o Athani Tq Athani Dt Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'The S.L.A.O. Hipparagi Project, Athani', 'Address': 'Nan', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'The Executive Engineer, K.N.N.L., Athani', 'Address': 'Nan', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'The Deputy Commissioner', 'Address': 'Rept. by the State', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}
IN THE COURT OF JMFC., (II COURT) AT MYSURU Present : Smt. C.N. Munirathnamma., B.A., LL.B., JMFC (II Court), Mysuru DATED THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 C. C. No. : 480/2009 Complainant :State by Lashkar Police Mysuru City (Rep. by Learned A.P.P .) V/s Accused : E.C. Prakash S/o Chandra Aged about 26 years, R/at: Ramapatna village, Hunasur T aluk, Mysuru District. (Rep., by advocate Sri. B. Deepak) Date of Occurrence of Offence : 26.11.2009 Date of Recording Evidence : 06.04.2011 Date of Judgment Pronounced : 30.01.2021 (C.N.Munirathnamma) JMFC (II) Court, Mysuru 2 CC 480/2009 :: J U D G M E N T :: The PSI of Lashkar Police submitted charge sheet against accused for the offences punishable under Section 419, 468 & 420 of IPC. 2. Brief facts of the case of the Prosecution is that :- It is alleged in the written information that, on 26.11.2009 at about 9.15 am., at KSRTC bus stand, within the jurisdiction of Lashkar Police Station, when the accused arrived by bus bearing Reg.,No. KA-09-F-4088 from Hunsur to Mysuru Rural bus stand, at the time of passengers alighting the bus, CW-1/Lingaraju along with CW-2 & 3 were on duty of checking the passengers. During the checking they have found that the accused was traveling by holding Free pass No. 004110, which was issued to the staffs of KSRTC department. On enquiry they came of know that the accused manipulated the free pass, which was given to CW-15. The accused have used the pass by making colour xerox and affixed his photo in place of the photo of CW-15/Puttaswamy Gowda, driver-cum-conductor. Further, alleged that he forged the signature of CW-10 and cheated the department by incurring financial loss to the department. Therefore, CW-13 CC 480/2009 lodged written complaint against the accused at Lashkar Police Station. 3. On the basis of the typed written first information lodged by CW-1, the ASI of Lashkar Police Station has registered the case against the accused in Cr. No. 250/2008 dated 26.11.2008 under Section. 419, 468 & 420 of IPC. 4. The Investigation Officer during his investigation, received complaint, registered the case and submitted the FIR. Thereafter, conducted seizure Mahazar, seized the material objects and recorded the statements of witnesses. After completion of investigation, the PSI of Lashkar Police submitted charge sheet against the accused for the aforesaid offences. 5.The cognizance was taken for the above said offences. The accused appeared before the court and was enlarged on bail. Copy of the charge sheet was supplied to the accused by complying Section 207 of Cr.P .C., Based on the prosecution materials, charge was framed and the same was read over and explained to accused in his k nown language. The accused denied the charge against him. The accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. Hence, posted the case for trial.
{'Name': 'State by Lashkar Police Mysuru City', 'Address': 'Nan', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Learned A.P.P.', 'Address': 'Nan', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'E.C. Prakash', 'Address': 'S/o Chandra, Ramapatna village, Hunasur Taluk, Mysuru District', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'advocate Sri. B. Deepak', 'Address': 'Nan', 'Party Name': 'accused'}
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C., AT HOSANAGARA DATED THIS THE 12th DAY OF JULY 2021 Present:- Smt. Pushpalatha K. B.A.(Law), LL.B., Senior Civil Judge & J.M.F.C., Hosanagar. R.A.No.01/2015 Appellant/s Defendant/s :- 1. Shivappa Gowda s/o Budyappa Gowda, Aged about 62 years, 2. Shanmuka s/o Shivappa Gowda Aged about 39 years, [Both are agriculturist, r/ Taruve Sanche, Sonale village, Humcha Hobli, Hosanagar Taluk] 3. Smt. Indramma w/o Somashekar Aged about 40 years, r/o Kolavalli village, Humcha Hobli, Hosanagar Taluk. (By Sri. K.N. Sridhara, Advocate) -v/s- Respondent/ s :- Shruthan s/o Manjunatha Minor represented by next friend Smt. Sowbhagya w/o Manjunatha Aged about 25 years, Agriculturist r/o Mumbaru, Hiriyogi village, 2 R.A.01/2015 Humcha Hobli, Hosanagar Taluk. (By Sri. D.N. Hiriyappa, Advocate) -0- Date of institution of appeal : 03.01.2015 Nature of appeal :Appeal filed against the Judgment and decree dated 26.11.2014 in O.S. 130/2011 passed by the learned Prl.Civil Judge & JMFC, Hosanagara, wherein the suit was decreed. Judgment pronounced in Appeal : 12.07.2021 Duration of Appeal : Years Months Days 06 05 11 (Pushpalatha K.) Sr. Civil Judge & JMFC, Hosanagar. J U D G E M E N T This is an appeal filed by the defendant in O.S. 130/2011 to set-aside judgment and decree dated 26.11.2014 of the Court of Prl. Civil Judge & JMFC, Hosanagara, in O.S. 130/2011. 3 R.A.01/2015 2.The appellants are the defendants and respondent is the plaintiff before the trial Court. 3.The ranks of the parties assigned before the trial Court are also assigned in this appeal for the sake of convenience. 4.The respondents herein filed suit in O.S. 130/2011 against the defendants for the relief of partition and separate possession. The case of the plaintiff in O.S. 130/2011 is that; The defendant No.1 had four children namely Raju, Indramma, Shanmuka and Manjunatha. The plaintiff is the son of Manjunatha who died leaving being minor plaintiffs on 18.07.2010. Suit A and B schedule properties are the ancestral and joint family properties of plaintiff the defendants. Suit C schedule properties are acquired out of the income of suit A and B schedule property. The defendant No.1 being the Kartha of the joint family has acquired suit schedule property in a family partition entered into between him and his brothers. After the death of the father of the
{'Name': 'Smt. Sowbhagya', 'Address': 'Mumbaru, Hiriyogi village, Humcha Hobli, Hosanagar Taluk', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}
1 O.S.NO.99/2017 IN THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC, MUDALAGI, AT : MUDALAGI PRESENT: Sri.Suresha S.N . B.A.LLB. Civil Judge & JMFC, Mudalagi. DATE OF JUDGEMENT: 20th day of March 2021 O.S.NO.99/2017 1. Ravi S/o Balappa Pujeri Age:35yrs, Occ:Military Service (Maratha Light infantry Regiment Center) C.Co. (Charlie Company) R/o Honakuppi, Tq.Gokak, Now at Belagavi. ...Plaintiff. (By Sri.S.B.Koujalagi, Advocate) Vs. 1 Mahendra S/o Balappa Pujeri Age:30yrs, Occ:S.K.S. Micro Finance, Chikkodi On duty at Honakuppi, Tq.Gokak 2. Smt.Shruti W/o Mahendra Pujeri Age:28yrs, Occ:Household. R/o Honakuppi, Tal.Gokak. ...Defendants. (By Sri.L.B.Wader, Advocate) 2 O.S.NO.99/2017 Date of Institution : 23-06-2017 Nature of Suit : Declaration & Injunction Date of commencement of recording of evidence. : 17-01-2019 Date of Judgment : 20-03-2021 Duration : Yrs Mths Ds 03 08 27 ---- JUDGMENT The Plaintiff has filed this suit for declaration that he is the owner of the suit property and consequential relief of possession of suit property. 2. The brief facts of the Plaintiffs case are as under. The suit property the house property and an open space bearing VPC No.458 situate at Honakuppi measuring 20' x 22' out of this 10' x 12' is a house and remaining is open space with boundaries, EastHouse of Pandappa Hegadeppa Hegade West House of Sadeppa Rangappa Sorannavar SouthBy Road NorthBy house of Basappa Vyapari. It is contended that one Kutubusab S/o Goussab Nadaf of Honakuppi was the owner of suit property. He was in need of 3 O.S.NO.99/2017 money to meet out the expenses of his family and to pay off hand loans etc. So he sold suit property in favour of Plaintiff on 16-05-2003 and since then he is in possession of the suit property. This being the state of affairs, he is serving in military and he married one Pooja in the year 2005. She lived with plaintiff for some time and left his company and started residing with mother of Plaintiff and Defendant No.1 and he allowed his wife, mother and Defendant No.1 to live in the suit property. Plaintiff further submitted that his wife filed maintenance case, criminal case and other cases against him. The defendant No.1 is helping his wife in all the litigations. This being the case, since 2011 he has not gone to Honakuppi. He learn in the month of May 2017 that Defendant No.1 has illegally entered his name to the suit property and he is intending to sell the suit property. So he approached the Defendant No.1 and told him not to sell the suit property and vacate the suit property but Defendant No.1 refused to do so saying that he is the owner of the suit property. The Defendant No.1 though he is not having right, title or interest in the suit property, he is intending to sell the suit property. Even advise of elders in this regard went in vain. 3. After service of suit summons, the Defendant No.1 appeared through his counsel and filed his Written Statement. The Defendant No.2 adopted the Written Statement of
{'Name': 'Ravi', 'Address': 'Honakuppi, Tq.Gokak, Now at Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Mahendra', 'Address': 'On duty at Honakuppi, Tq.Gokak', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Smt.Shruti', 'Address': 'Honakuppi, Tal.Gokak', 'Party Name': 'accused'}
IN THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., AT HARAPANAHALLI PRESENT: Smt.Fakirawwa Kelageri B.A.LL.B. Civil Judge & JMFC,Harapanahalli O.S NO.23/2017 Dated this 9th day of February 2022 PLAINTIFFS: Togyanaik S/o Pakshinaik, aged about 60 years, Agriculturist, R/o Sasalu Halla(Guluganji Hatti) Holalkeri Taluk, Chigradurga Dist. // Vs. // DEFENDANTS: 1.Julyanaik S/o Pakkiranaik, aged about 70 years, 2.Kheeryanaik, S/o Pakkiranaik, aged about 58 years, 3.Ambibai D/o Pakkiranaik, aged about 50 years, All are Hindus, Agriculturists, R/o Shivapura Village, Harapanahalli Tq. 1. Linganaik S/o Govindanaik, aged about 65 years, 4.Rukmunibai W/o Rajanaik, aged about 55 years, 5.Gowribai D/o Govindanaik, aged about 53 years, 6.Beeranaik S/o Govindanaik, Aged about 58 years, All are Hindus, Agriculturists, R/o Arasapura village, Kadalabalu Post, Davangere Tq.&Dist. -2- O.S.No. 23/2017 1.Laxmibai D/o Totyanaik, aged about 49 years, 2.Seethabai D/o Totyanaik, Aged a bout years, Both are Hindus, Agriculturists, R/o Shivapura village, Harapanahalli Tq. 3.Heeribai W/o Krishnanaik, Aged about 68 years, Agriculturist, R/o Arasapura Village, Kadalabalu Post, Davanagere Tq&Dist. 4.Revyanaik S/o Chandri Hanumanaik, Aged about 72 years, Agriculturist, R/o Shivapura Village, Harapanahalli Tq. 5.Ganglibai D/o Chandri Hanumanaik, Aged about 65 years, Agriculturist, R/o Komaranahalli Thanda, Harapanahalli Tq. 6.Ramanibai D/o Chandri Hanumanaik, Aged about 62 years, Agriculturist, R/o Shivapura Village, Harapanahalli Tq. 7.Hemlibai D/o Govindanaik, Aged about 68 years, Agriculturist, R/o Gulaganjihatti Holalkeri Taluk,Chitradurga Dist. 8.Parameshnaik S/o Pakshinaik, aged abut 58 years, Agriculturist, R/o Sasalu Halla(Guluganji Hatti) Holalkeri Taluk, Chitradurga Dist. CLAIM: To pass a decree in favour of the plaintiff as against the defendants as follows: -3- O.S.No.23/2017 1.To decree the suit by allotting 1/7th legitimate share to plaintiff No.1 along with defendant No.15 and to put them separate possession. If the defendants fails to do so the same may be implemented through court commissioner. 2.To award cost of the suit. 3.To grant such other reliefs. Cause of action arose on : 10.06.2016 Suit filed on : 30.01.2017 Value of the suit : Rs.4,00,000/- Court fee paid : Rs.200/- This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri.G.C.Gurumath, Advocate For Plaintiff, Sri.THM.Manjunath,Advocate for Defendant No.1 to 10 and 12,13 and 15, Sri.Ramanagouda Patel Advocate for Defendant No.11, and Defendant No.14 dismissed and upon perusing the material papers and documents placed before the court and the same having stood over to this day for consideration. DECREE It is ordered and decreed that, suit of the plaintiff is hereby dismissed. It is further ordered and decreed that, their is no order as to costs. Given under my hand and the seal of the court, this 9th day of February 2022. Civil Judge & JMFC Harapanahalli.
{'Name': 'Togyanaik', 'Address': 'Sasalu Halla(Guluganji Hatti) Holalkeri Taluk, Chigradurga Dist.', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Julyanaik', 'Address': 'Shivapura Village, Harapanahalli Tq.', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Kheeryanaik', 'Address': 'Shivapura Village, Harapanahalli Tq.', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Linganaik', 'Address': 'Arasapura village, Kadalabalu Post, Davangere Tq.&Dist.', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Rukmunibai', 'Address': 'Arasapura village, Kadalabalu Post, Davangere Tq.&Dist.', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Beeranaik', 'Address': 'Arasapura village, Kadalabalu Post, Davangere Tq.&Dist.', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Heeribai', 'Address': 'Arasapura Village, Kadalabalu Post, Davanagere Tq&Dist.', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'Revyanaik', 'Address': 'Shivapura Village, Harapanahalli Tq.', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'Parameshnaik', 'Address': 'Sasalu Halla(Guluganji Hatti) Holalkeri Taluk, Chitradurga Dist.', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
IN THE COURT OF ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC. RAIBAG. PRESENT: SHRI. G. B. HALLAKAI B.A. LL.B[Spl] Addl. Civil Judge & JMFC., Raibag. O.S.No. 536/ 2017. Dated:19 th APRIL 2021 PLAINTIFF: 01.SHRI. PANDU S/O. DATTU BIRAJ, Age: 40 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Khanadal village, Tal: Raibag District: Belagavi. [Rep by: Shri. P.M.D., Advocate.] DEFENDANT: 01.SHRI. SHANKAR DOULAT BIRAJ, Age: 70 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Khanadal village, Tal: Raibag District: Belagavi. [Defendant placed exparte]Judgment O.S.No.536/2017 01 Date of Institution of the suit 24-07-2017 02 Nature of the suit Permanent Injunction. 03 Date of the commencement of recording of evidence12-04-2021 04 Date on which the Judgment is pronounced19-04-2021 05 Total duration Year/s Month/s Day/s 03 08 26 J U D G M E N T The plaintiff has filed this suit for seeking relief of permanent injunction to restrain the defendant and any other persons on his behalf from obstructing the plaintiff's peaceful possession, wahiwat and enjoyment over the suit property with costs. 02. Brief facts of the plaint are that: The plaintiff and defendant have got partitioned in the family lands the land to the extent of 00-Acre 16-Guntas-08-Ana+00-Acre-05-Guntas out of land R.S.No.129/7 is fallen to the share of the plaintiff and his brothers and land to the extent of 00-Acre-05-Gs out2Judgment O.S.No.536/2017 of land R.S.No.129/7 and land R.S.No.129/6 measuring 00- Acre 16-Gs-08-Ana was allotted to the share of defendant as his share and as per the partition waradi, their names were entered as per the MR No.102/2007-08 of Khanadal village. As per the relinquishment deed made by the defendant, the name of the plaintiff was duly entered in the ROR of the said land as per M.R.No.H31/2013-14 of Khandal village. The plaintiff is in acutal possession wahiwat and enjoyment over the suit property without anybodies obstructions till today. The defendant is no way concerned to the suit property and he is the uncle of the plaintiff and he is trying to encroach towards eastern side of suit property. The plaintiff requested him not to do so, but the defendant is not ready to give any heed to the request of the plaintiff. Therefore, the plaintiff is constrained to file this suit. Hence, he prayed for decreeing the suit.3
{'Name': 'SHRI. PANDU', 'Address': 'R/o. Khanadal village, Tal: Raibag District: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}
1 MVC.525/15 A W A R D Date of Institution: 15.12.2015 Date of Disposal : 21.03.2018 BEFORE THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL NO.XIV , MUDHOL, DISTRICT : BAGALKOT M.V .C. NO.525/2015 1.Smt.Parvati W/o Bhimappa @ Bhimashi Hadapad, Age: 40 Years, Occ: Household work, 2.Kantu @ Shrikant S/o Bhimappa @ Bhimashi Hadapad, Age: 21 Years, Occ: Student, 3.Mahananda D/o Bhimappa @ Bhimashi Hadapad, Age: 19 Years, Occ: Student, 4.Mallappa S/o Bhimappa Hadapad, Age: 70 Years, Occ: Nil, 5.Smt.Parvatevva W/o Mallappa Hadapad, Age: 65 Years, Occ: Nil, All are R/o Hyagadi Plot, Mahalingapur, Tq.Mudhol, Dist.Bagalkot. ...Petitioners - V/S - 1.Bhimappa S/o Ramappa Banaj, Age: 48 years, Occ: Owner of cruiser bearing No.KA-48/M-5291, R/o Kesaragoppa, Tq.Mudhol, Dist.Bagalkot. 2.The Assistant Manager Claims, Cholamandalam, MS General Insurance Co.ltd., B.A.Kalaburgi Squire, Desai Corner, Deshapande Nagar, Hubali, Dist.Dharwad. (Policy – 3362/00905105/000/00 Valid from 20.4.2014 to 19.04.2015) 3.Pattlur Shaikshavali S/o P Nabisab, Age: 50 years, Occ: Owner of Truck bearing No.AP-02, TB-3959, R/o. No.14-206, Banda Masjid Street, Tadapatri, Dist.Anantpur-515411, A.P .State. 4.The Regional Manager, New India Assurance Co.Ltd., Regional Office, 2 MVC.525/15 Shrinath Building, N.C.M. Hubali, Dist.Dharwad. Policy No: 61150031130100012879 Valid from : 07.02.2014 to 06.02.2015 ...Respondents This petition is filed U/Sec.166 of the M.V .Act by Sri.Y.M.Kamblekar, Advocate for the petitioner requesting for grant of compensation amount of Rs.30,00,000/- with interest and cost on account of injury sustained to the petitioner in the motor vehicle accident that took place on 22.06.2014 at about 11.50 P .M. on Mudhol-Lokapur PWD road, near Ballur R.C. Centre cross, due to rash and negligent driving of vehicles i.e. Tempo Trax bearing No.KA-48/M- 5291 and Truck No.AP-02/TB-3959, by these drivers. This case is coming on this 21st day of March, 2018 for final disposal before Sri.Umesh S.Atnure, B.Com. LL.B.(Spl), Addl. Senior Civil Judge and JMFC., Mudhol in presence of Sri.M.S.Shirur, Advocate for petitioner, Sri.P .D.Pattar, Advocate for Respondent No.2, Smt.A.A.Raghuveer, Advocate for Respondent No.4, Respondent No.1 and 3 placed ex-parte. It is hereby ordered and awarded that : Claim petition filed by the petitioner U/S.166 of M.V . Act is partly allowed with costs of Rs.1,000/-. Petitioner is awarded just and reasonable compensation of Rs.7,72,000/- (Rupees Seven Lakh Seventy Two Thousand Only) with interest at the rate of 9% p.a. from the date of petition to till the date of depositing of the compensation amount in the court. Respondent No.1 and 2 are jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation amount to the petitioner. The petition against the respondent No.3 and 4 is dismissed. 3 MVC.525/15 Respondent No.2/Insurance Company is directed to deposit the awarded compensation amount to the respective petitioners in the Court within 2 months from the date of this judgment. The petitioner No.1 being the wife of the deceased is entitled for 40%, the petitioner no.2 and 3 being the son and daughter of the deceased are entitled for 10% each, the petitioner no.3 and 4 are the father and mother of the deceased are entitled for 20% each. On deposit of compensation amount all the petitioners shall deposit 50% of their share in any of the Nationalized Bank as F.D. for a period of 3 years. After expiry of period of fixed deposit the Bank Authorities are at liberty to release the amount shown in the F .D. to the concerned depositor in accordance with rules and regulations of the bank after proper identification of the depositor. Remaining 50% of the amount is to be paid to the petitioners under A/c. Payee non-transferable crossed-cheque after due identification as per rules and after verifying the stay order from the Hon'ble Appellate Court. Given under my hand and seal of the Court on this 21st day of March, 2018. Sd/- (Umesh S. Atnure) Member, MACT-XIV ,, Mudhol. :: BILL OF COSTS :: Sl. No.Particulars By petr/s.By Respt/s 1C.F . paid on petition 10-00 - 2Process fees 20-00 - 3Cost 1,000-00 - 4Advocates fee F .C. not filed
{'Name': 'Smt.Parvati', 'Address': 'Hyagadi Plot, Mahalingapur, Tq.Mudhol, Dist.Bagalkot', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Kantu @ Shrikant', 'Address': 'Hyagadi Plot, Mahalingapur, Tq.Mudhol, Dist.Bagalkot', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Mallappa', 'Address': 'Hyagadi Plot, Mahalingapur, Tq.Mudhol, Dist.Bagalkot', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Smt.Parvatevva', 'Address': 'Hyagadi Plot, Mahalingapur, Tq.Mudhol, Dist.Bagalkot', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Bhimappa', 'Address': 'Kesaragoppa, Tq.Mudhol, Dist.Bagalkot', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Pattlur Shaikshavali', 'Address': 'No.14-206, Banda Masjid Street, Tadapatri, Dist.Anantpur-515411, A.P .State', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC., BALLARI Present: Shri. ABDUL RAHAMAN PATHAN , B.A. LL.M., Pr incipa l Civil Judge & JMFC., Ballari C.C. No. 335 /201 7 Dated this the 1 6 TH day of A p ril 20 2 1 Complainant: State rep resented by Gandhi Nagar Police Station. (By Assistant Public Prosecutor) // Versus // Accused : 1) Smt. Sujata W/o Venkataswamy, aged about 45 years, R/o Behind Pavan Hotel, Srirampur a Colony, Ballari. 2) Smt . Pushpavati W/o Sathya narayana, aged about 35 years, R/o Near Canal, Talur Road, Ballari. (Shri. V.G.P., Adv.,) JUDGMENT Police Sub - Inspector, Gandhi Nagar, Police Station Ballari filed this charge sheet against accused No. 1 and 2 for the offences punishable U/Section 32 and 34 of Karnataka Excise Act. 2 C.C. No. 335 /201 7 2. The case of prosecution in nutshell: It is the case of prosecution that, on 24 - 05 - 2015 at about 08.20 am, when CW - 1/Police Sub - Inspector was in Police Station received credible information that, some people in two shop s situated near railway under bridge, opposite to P.W.D. Office illegally and without any permits are selling liquor. Pursuant to information, CW - 1 called panchas i.e, CW - 2 and 3 through his offic ial i.e, CW - 6. Thereafter, went to spot along with CW - 2 to 7 and saw that, accused No. 1 in her tea stall and accused No. 2 in her vegetable stall were selling liquor. On search he found 90 mls 03 original choice whisky pouches and 90 mls 09 Hey wards whisky pouches in the shop of accused No. 1 and found 650 mls 08 Kingfisher beer bottles in the shop of accused No. 2 . On inquiry they stated that, they do not have permits to sell liquor. He seized the same drawing mahazar as per Ex.P1 in presence o f CW - 2 and 3. Out of seized liquor bottles he drew each one bottles as sample for chemical analysis. Thereafter, he returned to Police Station and handed over the same to CW - 9 to proceed further along with report. 3. On the basis of aforementioned report, CW - 9 registered case against accused No. 1 and 2 for the offences punishable U/Section 32 and 34 of Karnataka Excise Act in Crime No. 121/2015 and sent First Information Report to the Jurisdictional Magistrate and handed over further investigation to CW - 1 . CW - 1 recorded statements of CW - 4 to 7 and sent bottles drew as sample for chemical analysis and handed over 3 C.C. No. 335 /201 7 further investigation to CW - 10. CW - 10 received chemical analysis report. Based on the material collected came to conclusion that, accused No. 1 an d 2 committed offences as such, filed final report against them for the offences punishable U/Section 32 and 34 of Karnataka Excise Act. 4. After filing charge sheet cognizance of the offences punishable Under Section 32 and 34 of Karnataka Excise Act is taken. The presence of accused No. 1 and 2 is secured by issuing summons. They appeared through their counsel. The prosecution papers were supplied to them as enumerated Under Section 207 of Code of Criminal Procedure and were released on bail. The charge for the offences punishable Under Section 32 and 34 of Karnataka Excise Act is framed, read over and explained to accused No. 1 and 2 in the language known to them. They pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. 5. During trial, prosecution examined 0 6 witnesses as PW - 1 to PW - 6 . In support of oral evidence, the prosecution got marked 0 4 documents as Ex.P - 1 to 4 and M.O.1 to 3 / liquor pouches are also marked and closed its side. The statement s of accused No. 1 and 2 ha ve been recorded as per Section 31 3 of Cr.P.C explaining incriminating evidence adduced against them. They denied the same and did not produce any oral or documentary defense evidence. 6. On the basis of charge sheet allegations, oral and documentary evidence adduced by the prosecution, following points arise for my consideration:
{'Name': 'Smt. Sujata', 'Address': 'Behind Pavan Hotel, Srirampura Colony, Ballari', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Smt. Pushpavati', 'Address': 'Near Canal, Talur Road, Ballari', 'Party Name': 'accused'}
KABG010065472016 IN THE COURT OF II ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, AND MEMBER OF ADDL.MACT, BELAGAVI AT: BELAGAVI Dated this 31s t day of August 2021 PRESENT: Smt.Meenaxi Bani. B.Com , LL.B., II Addl. Dist. & Sessions Judge, Belagavi MVC No.2011/2016 1. Smt.Parvati W/o Virupaxi Sampagavi, Age: 24 years, Occ: House wife, R/o Sampagaon, Tq.Bailhongal, Dist: Belagavi. 2.Shri.Ramling Parappa Juttanavar, Age: 30 years, Occ: Coolie., R/o Sampagaon, Tq.Bailhongal, Dist: Belagavi. ....Petitioners (By Sri.R.J.Melinmani, Advocate) - Vs- 1. Shri.Shivanand S/o Channaveerappa Kambar, Age: 50 years, Occ: Agrl.,2MVC No.2011/2016 R/o Sampagaon, Tq.Bailhongal, Dist: Belagavi. (Owner of Motor Cycle bearing No.KA-23/H-5206) 2.The Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co.Ltd., Ramdev Galli, Belagavi, (Insurer of Motor Cycle bearing No.KA-23/H-5206) …..Respondents (R-1: By Sri.S.S.Shettar, Advocate, R-2: By Sri.S.P.Chougule, Advocate) JUDGEMENT Petitioners have filed this petition u/s. 166 of M.V.Act claiming compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- on account of death of their mother Smt.Shivagangavva Parappa Juttannavar, in a Road Traffic Accident. 2. The petition averments in brief are that : On 19.4.2016, at about 11.30 hours., the deceased was proceeding towards her house by walk, when she came near Belagavi-Bailhongal road at Sampagaon village limits, within the jurisdiction of Bailhongla P.S., motor cycle bearing No.KA-23/H-5206 ridden by its rider, in a3MVC No.2011/2016 very high speed, in a rash and negligent manner, lost control over the vehicle and dashed to deceased Shivagagangavva. Due to impact, she sustained grievous injury on the head and injuries on the other parts of her body. Immediately, after the accident, she was shifted BIMS Hospital in an ambulance, for treatment, but she died on the way to hospital. The Post Mortem of the deceased was conducted and after post mortem, the body was handed over to the petitioners. The petitioners spent Rs.25,000/- towards funeral and other obsequies. Prior to accident, the deceased was hale and healthy aged about 60 years, and doing coolie work and thereby earning Rs.9000/- p.m. She was maintaining herself and her family members, petitioners were fully depending upon her earnings. Due to untimely death of the deceased, the petitioners put to mental agony, lost the dependency and love and affection. The petitioners put to greater hardship physically, financially and mentally. The accident in question took place due to sole, rash and negligent act of the rider of the offending vehicle i.e., motor cycle bearing No.KA-23/H-5306. Respondent no.1 is owner and respondent No.2 is the insurer of the said vehicle, are jointly and severally liable to pay the
{'Name': 'Smt.Parvati', 'Address': 'R/o Sampagaon, Tq.Bailhongal, Dist: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Shri.Shivanand', 'Address': 'R/o Sampagaon, Tq.Bailhongal, Dist: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'accused'}
IN THE COURT OF ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC ATHANI, AT : ATHANI. PRESENT: SHRI.VENKATESHAPPA. V B.A.LL.B., Addl. Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Athani. Date of Judgment: 07th day of June, 2021 LAC NO. 282 /201 7 Claimant/s: 1. Shri.Amasidda Madppa Huchawader, Age : 60 Years, Occ : Agriculture, R/o.Mole, T al: Athani, Dist : Belagavi. (By Sri. A.R.M., Advocate) // Versus// Respondents :- 1.The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Hipparagi Project, Athani. 2.The Executive Engineer, Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd., Athani, Dist: Belagavi. (Respondent No.1 by A.G.P . Athani) (Respondent No.2 by Sri.V.S.D., Adv.) JUDGMENT The reference in the aforesaid case has been made by the Land Acquisition Officer, Athani, U/sec.18 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act for adjudication of the claim made by the claimants for enhancement of the compensation amount in respect of the acquired land bearing RS No.350/4 measuring 02 guntas belonging to the claimants situated at Mole village, Athani taluka, Belagavi Dist. acquired for the purpose of Hipparagi Barrage Project. 2.The brief antecedents that lead to the aforesaid reference are as follows: The Land Acquisition Officer, HBC project, Athani had acquired the aforesaid land belonging to the claimants situated at Mole village, T aluka Athani for the purpose of HBC project, after duly publishing the preliminary notification U/sec.4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act dtd: 11.09.2009 and the same was published in the Karnataka Gazette on 08.10.2009 and subsequently the Land Acquisition Officer published notification u/sec.6(1) of the Land Acquisition Act dtd: 04.01.2011 and the same was published in the Karnataka Gazette on 03.03.2011 and passed an award and intimated same to the awardees on 26.03.2013 by fixing the market value of Mole village and the possession of the acquired lands were taken from the claimants. 3.The claimants feeling aggrieved by the award passed by the Land Acquisition Officer of Athani for the reason that the award was passed without giving any opportunity to the claimants to participate at any stage of acquisition proceedings and claimants had no opportunity to put-forth their grievance and SLAO has fixed lessor market value compared to the present market value in respect of acquired land. Therefore the claimants have made protest application u/sec.18(1) of the Land Acquisition Act for making reference to the Civil Judge Court for determining the market value and accordingly, the Land Acquisition Officer had made the reference. 4.The said reference application was registered before the Civil Judge court as LAC No.282/2017 . After registering the reference, notices were issued to the parties. The claimants are being 2 LAC.No.282/2017represented by their learned advocate Sri.ARM and the respondent is represented by AGP Athani and respondent No.2 is represented by Sri.V.S.D. advocate. 5.The respondents i.e., Land Acquisition Officer, Athani and Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Limited have raised objections to resist the claim petition filed by the claimant contending that the claim petition of the claimant filed u/sec.18(1) of the Land Acquisition Act is not maintainable either in law or on facts and the same is liable to be rejected. That the Land Acquisition Officer had personally inspected the land acquired and he had taken into consideration of all the attending circumstances as narrated in the above to determine the market value of the land acquired from the claimant. The market rate is fixed on the basis of similar land during the relevant period and hence it is proper, legal and valid. It is further contended that the claimants have not made definite claim before the Land Acquisition Officer and the respondent had given reasons for rejecting the exorbitant claim made by the claimant before him and the valuation arrived at by the respondent is quite adequate and reasonable. Therefore, there are no grounds for enhancement of compensation. The respondent further contended that the claim petition of the claimant is barred by limitation and hence, the claimants are not entitled for enhancement of compensation. Among these grounds, the respondents have prayed for dismissal of the claim petition. 6. The particulars of the land acquired by the Land Acquisition Officer, Athani from the claimants situated at Mole village, T aluka Athani is as follows: 3 LAC.No.282/2017
{'Name': 'The Executive Engineer', 'Address': 'Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd., Athani, Dist: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}
IN THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F .C. RAMDURG. AT: RAMDURG. PRESENT: Shri. Deshmukh Shivakumar B.A.L. LL.M. Civil Judge & JMFC Ramdurg. Original Suit No.54/2017 Dated: 15 th Day of April 2021 1.Shri. Bhimappa S/o. Parappa Murakatnal, Age : 60 years, Occ : Agriculture, R/o : K. Chandaragi, Tq : Ramdurg. 2.Shri. Fakirappa A/F Bhimappa Murakatnal, Age : 55 years, Occ : Agriculture, R/o : K. Chandaragi, Tq : Ramdurg. (By Shri. K. H. Patil, Advocate) ...Plaintiffs -Versus- 1.The Deputy Commissioner, Belagavi District, Belagavi. 2.The Assistant Commissioner, Bailhongal. 3.The T ahashildar, Ramdurg T aluk, Ramdurg. 4.Smt. Basavva W/o. Bhimappa Murakatnal, Age : 44 years, Occ : Household Work, R/o : K. Chandaragi, Tq : Ramdurg, Dist : Belagavi. : 2 : O.S.No.54/2017 5.Smt. Doddavva W/o. Kutnappa Gwadigoudar, Age : 46 years, Occ : Household Work, R/o : Munyal, Tq : Gokak. Now R/o : C/o : Bhimappa Parappa Murakatnal, R/o : K. Chandaragi, Tq : Ramdurg. (AGP) ...Defendants Date of filing of suit :25.03.2017 Nature of suit :For Declaration. Date of commencement of evidence :15.12.20218 Date of Judgment pronounced :15.04.2021 T otal duration :Years Months Days 04 01 20 Civil Judge & JMFC Ramdurg. ***** :J U D G M E N T: Plaintiff has files this suit for the relief of declaration of class II heirs and consequential relief of mandatory injunction. : 3 : O.S.No.54/2017 2.The brief case of the plaintiff is as under: It is submitted that one Fakirappa is the original propositous of the plaintiffs family. The propositous had four sons by name 1.Parappa, 2.Bhimappa, 3.Shivalingappa and 4.Basalingappa. The present plaintiff No.1 and 2 are the sons of Parappa. The Bhimappa, 2nd son of the propositous had died without marriage in the year 1984 but during his lifetime he adopted Fakirappa second son of Parappa who is nothing but present plaintiff No.2. 3.The propositous 3rd son Shivalingappa had died in the year 2004 leaving behind his wife Mallawwa and she was also died in the year 2015. The propositous fourth son Basalingappa had died in the year 2010. 4.This being the fact the 3rd son of the propositous Shivlingappa died without issues. The Shivalingappa
{'Name': 'Shri. Bhimappa', 'Address': 'K. Chandaragi, Tq : Ramdurg', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Smt. Basavva', 'Address': 'K. Chandaragi, Tq : Ramdurg, Dist : Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Smt. Doddavva', 'Address': 'Munyal, Tq : Gokak', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Smt. Basavva', 'Address': 'K. Chandaragi, Tq : Ramdurg, Dist : Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
IN THE COURT OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C. AT RAIBAG PRESENT:- SHRI. SOMA A.S., B.A., LL.B. Prl. Civil Judge And JMFC At Raibag Dated: 15th Day of FEBRUARY, 2021 O.S.No.691 / 2017 BETWEEN: 01.SRI. SADASHIV RAYAPPA GAAKARI, Age: 63 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o: Hanabarwadi, Tal: Raibag. 02.YALLAWWA RAYAPPA GAAKARI, Age: 75 years, Occ: House hold, R/o: Hanabarwadi, Tal: Raibag. 03.SRI. ANNAPPA RAYAPPA GAAKARI, Age: 68 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o: Hanabarwadi, Tal: Raibag. 04.SRI. ARJUN RAYAPPA GAAKARI, Age: 65 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o: Hanabarwadi, Tal: Raibag. 05.SRI. BHIMA RAYAPPA GAAKARI, Age: 65 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o: Hanabarwadi, Tal: Raibag. 06.SRI. MAYAPPA RAYAPPA GAAKARI, Age: 70 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o: Hanabarwadi, Tal: Raibag. 07.SMT. GOURAWWA W/O SIDDAPPA PATIL, Age: 25 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o: Shedbal, Tal: Athani. .... Plaintiff s (Reptd. by Shri. L. B. Chougule, Advocate.)Judgment 2 O.S.No.691/2017 //VERSUS// AND: 01.SMT. MAHADEVI W/O BASAPPA HELA VI @ HELA VOR, Age: 40 years, Occ: House hold, R/o: Hanabarwadi, Tal: Raibag. . …Defendant (Reptd. by Shri. P. M. Patil, Adv.) 01. Date of institution of suit 14-08-2017 02. Nature of suit Permanent Injunction. 03. Date of commencement of evidence.27-07-2018 04. Date of Judgment 15-02-2021 05. Total duration Year/ s Month/s Day/s 03 06 01 J U D G M E N T This suit has been filed by the plaintiffs for the relief of permanent injunction against the defendant and any other persons on her behalf from constructing any structure over the suit property bearing Gram Panchayat No.6-47A consisting of house and open space situated within the vicinity of Gram Panchayat Nandikurali with costs. Judgment 3 O.S.No.691/2017 02. The plaint averments in brief are as under; The suit property is absolute property of plaintiffs. The family of plaintiffs purchased the suit property in the year 1982 from its erstwhile owner Maruti Ratnappa Mali. The plaintiffs' families who were and are in possession of suit property since the date of purchase. Further, as per registered sale deed the name of plaintiffs came to be entered in the Record of rights and thereafter name of other plaintiffs entered in the Record of rights of suit property. At the time of purchasing suit property, building was constructed in an area measuring East - West 31 feet and South - North 37 feet and remaining area was open space, which is evidenced by sale deed for the year 1982. The plaintiffs were purchased the property within the boundaries and accordingly they are in possession since 1982. There is no City Survey in Gram Panchayat Nandikurali and taking undue advantage of the same, the defendant threatening to construct structure within the boundaries. There is no property just abutting to the suit property, but defendant under the guise of government beneficiary threatening to
{'Name': 'SMT. GOURAWWA', 'Address': 'Shedbal, Tal: Athani', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'SMT. MAHADEVI', 'Address': 'Hanabarwadi, Tal: Raibag', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
KABG010069012017 KABG010069022017 IN THE COURT OF II ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, AND MEMBER OF ADDL.MACT, BELAGAVI AT: BELAGAVI Dated this 20th day of November, 2021 PRESENT: Smt.Meenaxi Bani, B.A. , LL.B., II Addl. Dist. & Sessions Judge, Belagavi MVC No.1609/2017 & 1610/2017 1.Shri.Raju S/o Juvav Souz, Age: 38 years, Occ: Private Service now nil, (R/o Lalawadi, Tq.Khanapur), Now C/o Cecilia Anthony D'melo, House No.147, Vidyanagar, 2nd Cross, Angol- Belagavi. (By Sri.M.A.Patil, Advocate) ....Petitioner in 2 MVC No.1609/2017 & 1610/2017 MVC 1609/2017 1.Smt.Paskin W/o Mojes D'Souza, Age: 49 years, Occ: Tailoring and Coolie work, now Nil, R/o 977, Shastri Road, Kakati-Belagavi (By Sri.M.A.Patil, Advocate) ....Petitioner in MVC 1610/2017 1.Shri.Richard Anthony D'Souza, Age: 23 years, Occ: Business, R/o CCB No.95, M.M.Colony, Tilakwadi-Belagavi, (Owner of Car bearing No. KA-22/MA-4420) 2.The Divisional Manager, Bajaj Allianz Insurance Company, Madiwale Complex, Club road, Belagavi, (Insurer of Car bearing No. KA-22/MA-4420) (R1: Exparte, R2: By Sri.S.P.Chougala, Advocate) …..Respondents in both cases COMMON JUDGEMENT 3 MVC No.1609/2017 & 1610/2017 As these petitions are arising of the same accident, MVC No.1610/2017 is clubbed with MVC No.1609/2017 vide order dated 4.10.2019 and common evidence is recorded in MVC No.1609/2017. 2. The petitioners in both cases filed petition under the provision of section 166 of M.V.Act, 1988 seeking compensation amount of Rs.40,00,000/- each with interest, for the injuries sustained by petitioners in both cases, in the RTA from respondents with interest. 3. The petition averments in both cases in brief are that : On 19.5.2017, petitioners in both petitions were returning to their home from Gunji after attending Haldi ceremony along with their relatives in Car owned by his cousin brother bearing Reg.No.KA-22/MA-4420. When they came near Tivoliwadi cross on Khanapur – Londa road, at that time, driver of the car bearing Reg.No.KA- 22/MA-4420 was driving the car in a high speed, rash and negligent manner and without observing traffic norms and dashed rear portion of the car to the standing tree, due to which the car turned upside down and caused the
{'Name': 'Shri.Raju', 'Address': 'House No.147, Vidyanagar, 2nd Cross, Angol- Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Smt.Paskin', 'Address': '977, Shastri Road, Kakati-Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}
IN THE COURT OF THE PRL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, UTTARA KANNADA, KARWAR. DATED THIS THE 20 th DAY OF APRIL -2017 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 128/2006 PRESENT : Sri. V.S.Dharwadkar, B.Com., L.L.B.(Spl), Prl.District & Sessions Judge, Uttara Kannada, Karwar . APPELLANT : Venkatraman s/o Manjappa Naik, Age 43 years, Tempo driver, R/o Pokkan Govindan Mane, Chitrapur,Shirali, Taluka: Bhatkal. (By Sri.K.T.Gowda,…. Advocate.) Vs. RESPONDENT : The State of Karnatataka, Represented by Public Prosecutor, Uttara Kannada, Karwar. JUDGMENT This appeal has been filed by the accused against the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the Additional J.M.F.C Kumta in CC No.1212/2005 dated:27/7/2006 . 2. It is stated by the appellant that he has been convicted for the offences punishable under Section 279, 337, 338 and 304A of Indian Penal Code and he has been sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a peri od of Cri.Apl.No.128/06 2 three months and to pay fine of Rs.500/- for the of fence punishable under Section 279 of Indian Penal Code a nd in default of payment of fine he shall further underg o simple imprisonment for a period of 15 days. 3. It is further stated that he is sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of two mon ths and to pay fine of Rs.250/- for the offence punishable under Section 337 of Indian Penal Code and in default of payment of fine he shall further undergo simple imprisonment f or a period of 15 days and he also sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay fi ne of Rs.500/- for the offence punishable under Section 3 38 of Indian Penal Code and in default of payment of fine he shall further undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months and the accused is further sentenced to und ergo simple imprisonment for one year and to pay fine of Rs.2000/- and in default of payment of fine he shal l further undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three m onths for the offence under Section 304A of Indian Penal Code and all the sentences are ordered to run concurrently. 4. It is stated that being aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the t rial Cri.Apl.No.128/06 3 Court, the appellant begs to prefer this appeal on the following grounds: i) It is contended that the judgment of conviction passed, sentence and fine imposed against the appellant is quite contrary to law and true facts o f the case and it is laible to be set aside and the accused is entitled for acquittal and for refund of the fine amount deposited by him. ii) It is contended that the entire charge framed and the procedures followed by the learned Magistrate is not in accordance with the law. iii) It is contended that while looking to the allegations made, it is evident that there was absolutely no evidence of rash and negligent driving on the part of the accused and as such the conviction recorded is unsustainable. iv) It is contended it is evident from the records that on the relevant date and time, there was heavy rain and the deceased was coming from opposite direction in the early morning 6-00a.m and he lost control and dashed against the temp driven by the appellant resulting in head on collusion and it is contended that the place of accident is National Highway and there will be movements of various vehicles and the tempo was parked little away, but unfortunately the police have deliberately pointed out the tempo towards the right side
{'Name': 'Venkatraman', 'Address': 'R/o Pokkan Govindan Mane, Chitrapur, Shirali, Taluka: Bhatkal', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Venkatraman', 'Address': 'R/o Pokkan Govindan Mane, Chitrapur, Shirali, Taluka: Bhatkal', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
IN THE COURT OF THE PRL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, DHARWAD. DATED THIS THE 4th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022. PRESENT: SRI. UMESH.M.ADIGA, B.Com. LL.B. (SPL), PRL. DIST. & SESSIONS JUDGE, DHARWAD. R.A.No.134/2017 & 135/2017 PARTIES IN RA.NO.134/2017 APPELLANT/S: 1Neelavva W/o Mallappa Roogi, Age: 67 years Occ: Household work, R/o Amminabhavi Tq & Dt: Dharwad 2Ningappa Malleshappa Yadahalli, Age: 64 years Occ: Agriculture, R/o Amminabhavi Tq & Dt: Dharwad 3Basappa Malleshappa Yadahalli, Age: 62 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Amminabhavi Tq & Dt: Dharwad 4Nagappa Malleshappa Yadahalli, Age: 60 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Amminabhavi Tq & Dt: Dharwad (By Sri.Srikant.T.Patil Advocate) V/s RESPONDENT/S: 1Malleshappa Yallappa Hadagal Since deceased by his L.Rs 1(a)Shantawwa W/o Malleshappa Hadagal, Age: 66 years Occ: House wife, R.A.No.134/2017 & RA No.135/2017 R/o Bhairidevarkoppa, Hubballi Tq: Hubballi Dt: Dharwad 1(b)Siddavva W/o Mallappa Gandodi, Age: 47 years Occ: House wife, R/o Unkal, Hubballi Tq: Hubballi Dt: Dharwad 1(c)Yallappa S/o Malleshappa Hadagal, Age: 47 years Occ: Agriculture, R/o Bhairidevarkoppa, Hubballi Tq: Hubballi Dt: Dharwad 1(d)Basappa S/o Malleshappa Hadagal, Age: 43 years Occ: Agriculture, R/o Bhairidevarkoppa, Hubballi Tq: Hubballi Dt: Dharwad 1(e)Ramachandra S/o Malleshappa Hadagal, Age: 41 years Occ: Agriculture, R/o Bhairidevarkoppa, Hubballi Tq: Hubballi Dt: Dharwad 1(f)Siddappa S/o Malleshappa Hadagal, Age: 39 years Occ: Agriculture, R/o Bhairidevarkoppa, Hubballi Tq: Hubballi Dt: Dharwad 1(g)Maltesh S/o Malleshappa Hadagal, Age: 37 years Occ: Agriculture, R/o Bhairidevarkoppa, Hubballi Tq: Hubballi Dt: Dharwad 1(h)Neelavva W/o Basappa Mensinkai, Age: 34 years Occ: House wife, R/o Unkal, Hubballi Tq: Hubballi Dt: Dharwad 1(i)Adiveppa S/o Malleshappa Hadagal, Age: 32 years Occ: Agriculture, R/o Bhairidevarkoppa, Hubballi Tq: Hubballi Dt: Dharwad 2 R.A.No.134/2017 & RA No.135/2017 (By Sri.S.S.K., Adv., for R.1(a) to R.1(i)) Date of filing of the appeal before this Court.15.06.2017 Nature of appeal Against the judgment and decree dated 21.04.2017 in O.S.No.130/2005 passed by the I Addl.Senior Civil Judge, Dharwad. Date of judgment 04-02-2022 T otal duration 04 Years 05 months 19 Days PARTIES IN RA.NO.135/2017 APPELLANT/S: 1 Neelavva W/o Mallappa Roogi, Age: 67 years Occ: Household work, R/o Amminabhavi Tq & Dt: Dharwad 2 Ningappa Malleshappa Yadahalli, Age: 64 years Occ: Agriculture, R/o Amminabhavi Tq & Dt: Dharwad 3 Basappa Malleshappa Yadahalli, Age: 62 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Amminabhavi Tq & Dt: Dharwad 4 Nagappa Malleshappa Yadahalli, Age: 60 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Amminabhavi Tq & Dt: Dharwad (By Sri.Srikant.T.Patil Advocate) V/s3
{'Name': 'Neelavva', 'Address': 'Amminabhavi Tq & Dt: Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Shantawwa', 'Address': 'Bhairidevarkoppa, Hubballi Tq: Hubballi Dt: Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Siddavva', 'Address': 'Unkal, Hubballi Tq: Hubballi Dt: Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Yallappa', 'Address': 'Bhairidevarkoppa, Hubballi Tq: Hubballi Dt: Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Basappa', 'Address': 'Bhairidevarkoppa, Hubballi Tq: Hubballi Dt: Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Ramachandra', 'Address': 'Bhairidevarkoppa, Hubballi Tq: Hubballi Dt: Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Siddappa', 'Address': 'Bhairidevarkoppa, Hubballi Tq: Hubballi Dt: Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Maltesh', 'Address': 'Bhairidevarkoppa, Hubballi Tq: Hubballi Dt: Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Neelavva', 'Address': 'Unkal, Hubballi Tq: Hubballi Dt: Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Adiveppa', 'Address': 'Bhairidevarkoppa, Hubballi Tq: Hubballi Dt: Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Shantawwa', 'Address': 'Bhairidevarkoppa, Hubballi Tq: Hubballi Dt: Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Siddavva', 'Address': 'Unkal, Hubballi Tq: Hubballi Dt: Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Yallappa', 'Address': 'Bhairidevarkoppa, Hubballi Tq: Hubballi Dt: Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Basappa', 'Address': 'Bhairidevarkoppa, Hubballi Tq: Hubballi Dt: Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Ramachandra', 'Address': 'Bhairidevarkoppa, Hubballi Tq: Hubballi Dt: Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Siddappa', 'Address': 'Bhairidevarkoppa, Hubballi Tq: Hubballi Dt: Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Maltesh', 'Address': 'Bhairidevarkoppa, Hubballi Tq: Hubballi Dt: Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Neelavva', 'Address': 'Unkal, Hubballi Tq: Hubballi Dt: Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Adiveppa', 'Address': 'Bhairidevarkoppa, Hubballi Tq: Hubballi Dt: Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}
KABG500004302017 IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, GOKAK Present: K.M.SHANKAR, B.A.L, LL.B., I Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Gokak C/C. II Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Gokak Dated, this the 18th day of September, 2021 ECA 12/2017 Petitioner: Ramsidda S/o. Beerappa Ojappagol, Age: 26 years, Occ: Coolie, R/o: Benachinamaradi village, Gokak taluk. (By Sri. KSH., Advocate) V/s. Respondents: 1. Gaiban Khan, Age: Major, Occ: Agri & Business, R/o: Bhimanahalli village, Mayasandra Post Thippasandra Hobali, Magadi taluk, Ramnagara district. (Owner of Truck bearing No:KA-07/8244).ECA 12/2017 2. Shriram General Insurance Co., Ltd., Reco Industrial Area Sitapur-Jaipur, Rajasthan-302022. (Insurer of Truck bearing No.KA-07/8244) Policy No.10003/31/13/283104 Valid from 28-09-2012 to 27-08-2013) (R1 by Sri. ABN., Advocate & R2 by Sri. AAP, Advocate) J U D G E M E N T The petitioner has made in the instant petition and sought for granting compensation of Rs.5,00,000/-, with interest at the rate of 18% P .A., costs and such other reliefs. Initially the petition was filed before the Commissioner for Workmen Compensation, Belagavi and it was transferred to the Prl. Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Belagavi and then it was presented to this court on the point of territorial jurisdiction. 2. Brief facts of the case of the petitioner are that he was an employee under the 1st respondent and was working as a coolie in a Truck bearing No.KA-07/8244 and was earning of Rs.500/- per day and getting batta of Rs.100/-. On 21.01.2013, as per the instructions of the 1st respondent, the petitioner was working in the2ECA 12/2017 said truck in order to load the cotton bells from the Shinglapur pressing industry and himself and other coolies went to the said industries and loaded the truck and when the petitioner was climbing the truck for tightening the roap it was cut off and the petitioner fell on the ground and sustained grievous injuries to his wrists. Thereafter, he was shifted to the Ganga Surgical and fracture clinical, Gokak and his both wrists collies fractured and right fracture coronoid process right elbow, collies fractured of left wrist. As per the advise of the doctor the petitioner has under gone bed rest for more than a month and spent more than Rs.60,000/- towards his medicine and hospital bills along with other expenses. 3. Prior to the accident the petitioner was hale and healthy and was aged about 26 years and was working as a coolie and was earning Rs.15,000/- per month. He was the only male earning member of his family and is put to great loss and also is suffering physically, mentally and financially and became physically disable and is not in a position to do his earlier avocation and other works. 4. The accident caused during the course of employment of the petitioner with the 1st respondent, who is the owner, and3
{'Name': 'Ramsidda', 'Address': 'Benachinamaradi village, Gokak taluk', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE. Dated this the 26 th day of August 2021 Present: Sri.H.C.Shamprasad., B. A, LL.B., Presiding Officer. Serial Application No.3/2016 in AID.No.06/2015 The Management of M/s Agrosynth Chemicals Limited, Byrapura, Vijayapura Post, Devanahalli Taluk, Bengaluru rural District. ..…..Applicant. ( By Sri.Prashanth.B.K. Advocate ) Vs Mr.Veeranna S/o.Shamanna, Byrapura village, Vijapura Post, Devanahalli Taluk, Bangalore Rural District ……..Opposite Party. ( By Sri.M.Venkatappa., Advocate ) ***** O R D E R The applicant has filed the present application under section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, seeking an order of approval to the dismissal of the opposite part y dated 11.01.2016. 2 2. The contention of the applicant that, the o pposite party was employed and he was working at Byrapura vi llage, Devanahalli, Bangalore. On certain acts of misconduct t he opposite party was issued charge sheet cum show cause notice dated 03.12.2014 and explanation was called for and he has replied on 08.12.2014. For not satisfying with the r eply given by the opposite party, the applicant management decided t o initiate an enquiry by appointing an enquiry officer. The enq uiry officer has conducted the enquiry from 15.12.2014 and concluded on 17.10.2015 and submitted his findings. Then, the di sciplinary authority has issued second show cause notice, thereafter b y perusing the material on record and also evidence collect ed by the enquiry officer has proceeded to pass an order of di smissal. The misconduct alleged to have been committed by the op posite party are:- 26.02 Wilful in subordination or disobedience, whether alone or in combination with other to any l awful and reasonable order of his superior in the charge of h is duties. 26.05 Habitual breach of any law applicable to the company or standing orders. 26.11 Any act of subversive of di scipline. 26.35 Slowing down work whether singly or in combin ation with others or another, or instigating other to sl ow down work. 26.39 Neglect of duty including carelessness , laziness and inefficiency causing the quality of goods handl ed or 3 processed by the employee/workman to be below the q uality or quantity expected by the company. While considering the gravity of the charges levelled against the opposite p arty and also the opinion given by the enquiry officer, discipl inary authority has passed an order dated 11.01.2016 by dism issing the opposite party. The enquiry conducted against the opposite party is in accordance with the certified standing order and also following the principles of natural justice, which is fai r and proper. Since, AID No.6/2015 & I.D.No.43/2014 are p ending before this Tribunal and also the Industrial Tribunal respectively, the applicant was constrained to file the application b y seeking necessary approval, after complying the provisions under Section 33(2)(b) of I.D.Act. While passing the dismissal order, one month salary of the opposite party has been disbursed th rough cheque bearing No.025869, dated 11.01.2016 drawn on Vijaya Bank, Sarakki Branch, Bangalore. Hence, he has complie d the mandatory provisions under Section 33(2)(b) of I.D.Ac t. Hence, it is prayed for approval of the order of dismissal. 3. The opposite party has filed objections to the application stating that the application filed by the applicant is unsustainable under law and the same is liable to be di smissed. It is his contention that, he was joined to the service with the
{'Name': 'Mr. Veeranna', 'Address': 'Byrapura village, Vijapura Post, Devanahalli Taluk, Bangalore Rural District', 'Party Name': 'accused'}
KAHS020021882011 Presented on : 03-12-2011 Registered on : 03-12-2011 Decided on : 08-09-2021 Duration : 9 years, 9 months, 5 days IN THE COURT OF II ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT Hassan,HASSAN Presided Over by LOKESHA L.A.C./215/2011 Petitioner: Lokesha S/o Late. Thimmegowda. Age: 36 years. Address: Gavenahalli, Kasaba Hobli, Hassan Taluk and Hassan district. VERSUS Respondents : 1.State of Karantaka by Spl. Land Acquisition Officer Hassan. 2.Deputy Chief Engineer, Construction. Hassan-Bangalore Railway Cantonment, Shivaji Nagara, Bangalore. KAHS020021862011 L.A.C.No.215/2011, 213/2011 & 216/2011 L.A.C./213/2011 Petitioner : Rangamma W/o Annegowda. Age: 65 years. Address: Gavenahalli, Kasaba Hobli, Hassan Taluk, Hassan district. VERSUS Respondents : 1.State of Karantaka by Spl. Land Acquisition Officer Hassan. 2.Deputy Chief Engineer, Construction. Hassan-Bangalore Railway Cantonment, Shivaji Nagara, Bangalore. KAHS020021892011 L.A.C./216/2011 Petitioner: R. Gundegowda Dead by Lrs. 1.Jayalakshmi W/o late Gundegowda. Age: 58 years. 2.Asha G. D/o late Gundegowda. Age: 35 years. 3.Aruna G. S/o late Gundegowda. 2L.A.C.No.215/2011, 213/2011 & 216/2011 Age: 34 years. 4.Kalamma. S/o late Gundegowda. Aged about 58 years. All are R/o: Gavenahalli village, Kasaba Hobli, Hassan Taluk. Hassan district. VERSUS Respondents : 1.State of Karantaka by Spl. Land Acquisition Officer Hassan. 2.Deputy Chief Engineer, Construction. Hassan-Bangalore Railway Cantonment, Shivaji Nagara, Bangalore. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Advocate for Petitioner: K.R.INDRAKUMAR. Advocate for R-1 : D.G.P; R-2 Sri.B.C.S --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMON JUDGMENT These cases have arisen out of the references made by the respondent No.1 under Section 18(1) of Land Acquisition Act for adjudicating the correct market value of the acquired lands belonging to the claimants. After contest by the 1st respondent, this Court was allowed the petitions in part by determining the market value of land per gunta at Rs.1,00,000/­ as per order dated 03­12­2014. The said order was challenged by the 2nd respondent herein, who is the Deputy Chief Engineer 3
{'Name': 'Lokesha', 'Address': 'Gavenahalli, Kasaba Hobli, Hassan Taluk and Hassan district', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Rangamma', 'Address': 'Gavenahalli, Kasaba Hobli, Hassan Taluk, Hassan district', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Deputy Chief Engineer, Construction', 'Address': 'Nan', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
IN THE COURT OF II ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, AND MEMBER OF ADDL.MACT, BELAGAVI AT: BELAGAVI Dated this 27th day of March, 2021 PRESENT: Shri Nanjundaiah G. M.A. , LL.B.,(Spl) II Addl. Dist. & Sessions Judge, Belagavi MVC No.2268/2017 Shri. Bhimu S/o Mallappa Malgavi, Age: 55 years, Occ: Agrl., and business, R/o Laxmi Nagar, Kakati, Tq.Dist: Belagavi. ....Petitioner (By Shri.A.C.Kothari, Advocate) - Vs- 1.Shri.Gurunath S/o Bhimarao Kamble, Age: 38 years, Occ: Driver, R/o Jodakurli, Tq.Chikkodi, Dist: Belagavi (Driver of Tipper bearing Reg.No. MP-19/HA-2325) 2.GVR Infra Projects Ltd., Regional Office: 476, Tata Cauvery Layout, Amrutha Halli, Byatarayanapura, New Bengaluru Intl.Airport Road, Bengaluru-560 092, Represented by its Deputy Manager, Shri.Bhimrao V.Vaganageri 2 MVC No.2268/2017 (Owner of Tipper bearing Reg.No. MP 19 HA 2325) 3. The Divisional Manager, The New India Assurance Co.Ltd., Branch Office: 3128, Khade Bazar, Belagavi. (Insurer of Tipper bearing Reg.No. MP 19 HA 2325) …..Respondents (R1: By Sri.S.R.Shindhe, Advocate, R2: Exparte, R3: By Sri.A.B.Shintre,Advocate) JUDGEMENT This petition is filed under the provision of section 166 of M.V.Act, 1988 seeking compensation for the injuries caused in a road traffic accident. 2. The petition averments in brief are that : It is contended that on 20.2.2016 at 3.30 p.m., the petitioner after meeting his brother Babu was returning from Ainapur to Belagavi on his two wheeler Splendor vehicle bearing Reg.No.KA-22/ET-8946. When he has within the jurisdiction of Chikkodi Police near Majalatti Cross and had parked his vehicle beside the Chikkodi and Belagavi road and was drinking the water the respondent 3 MVC No.2268/2017 No.1 driving the vehicle Tipper bearing Reg.No.MP-19 HA- 2325 came in a rash and negligent manner with great speed and dashed the petitioner and his vehicle which was parked. Due to the said impact, the petitioner sustained bodily injuries. The petitioner's two wheeler Splendor vehicle bearing Reg.No.KA-22/ET 8946 was damaged. The Chikkodi Police have registered the Crime No.79/2016 and the police have charge sheeted the respondent No.1 under CC No.893/2016 wherein the respondent has pleaded guilt in the said case. The petitioner was hale and healthy prior to the accident. He was doing agriculture work as well as he was sitting in the Kirana/provisional stores and was earning his livelihood. Due to the said accident, the petitioner has become disabled. The petitioner is having back pain for which, he cannot sit for a long time at one place. The petitioner cannot do the owrks as he was doing prior to the accident. The petitioner has sufferred physically, financially and mentally and hence, the future of the petitioner has become miserable and dark. The petitioner is old aged person and he has to take care of his wife. But, due to the said accident, the life of the petitioner has become miserable. The accident was caused solely due to the rash and
{'Name': 'Shri. Bhimu', 'Address': 'R/o Laxmi Nagar, Kakati, Tq.Dist: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Shri.Gurunath', 'Address': 'R/o Jodakurli, Tq.Chikkodi, Dist: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'accused'}
1 O.S.NO.110/2017 IN THE COURT OF ADDL CIVIL JUDGE, BHATKAL Present:- Sri. Nagendra., BA.,LL.B., Addl. Civil Judge, Bhatkal. Dated this the 5th day of August 2020 O.S.No.110/2017 PLAINTIFFS: 1. Sri. Ganapathi S/o Jatta Naik, Aged about 50 years. 2. Sri. Krishna S/o Jatta Naik, Aged about 40 years, Both are R/o: Mallimane, Mannonda, Shirali-I Village, Bhatkal Taluk. (U.K) // Versus // DEFENDANTS: 1. Smt. Honnamma Kom Masti Naik, Since dead by her legal heirs. 1(a) Manjunatha Masti Naik, Since dead by his legal heirs. 1(a) (1) Madevi Kom Majunatha Naik, Aged about 48 years. 1(a) (2) Nagaraj S/o Manjunatha Naik, Aged about 30 years. 1(a) (3) Ravi S/o Manjunatha Naik, Aged about 32 years. 1(a) (4) Hareesh S/o Manjunatha Naik, Aged about 26 years. 1(b) Mastamma Kom Shaniyar Naik, Aged about 48 years. 1(c) Somayya S/o Masti Naik, Aged about 52 years. 1(d) Ishwara S/o Masti Naik, Aged about 50 years. 1(e) Suresh S/o Masti Naik, Aged about 48 years. 2 O.S.NO.110/2017 1 (f) Madevi Kom Subbanna Naik, Aged about 46 years. 2. Madevi Kom Rama Naik, Aged about 61 years. 3. Jaganatha S/o Rama Naik, Aged about 48 years. 4. Ishwara S/o Rama Naik, Aged about 43 years. 5. Jatta S/o Rama Naik, Aged about 38 years. 6. Madeva S/o Irayya Naik, Aged about 63 years. 7. Girija @ Lakshmi Kom Manjunatha Naik, Aged about 28 years. 8. Geeta S/o Nagappa Naik, Aged about 33 years. 9. Manikanta @ Mohan S/o Nagappa Naik, Aged about 26 years. 10. Iramma Kom Narayana Naik, Aged about 53 years, 11. Raghavendra S/o Narayana Naik, Aged about 28 years, Sl. No. 1 to 19 are R/o Devikan Road, Kaikini, Bhatkal Taluk. 12. Mastamma Kom Annappa Naik, Aged about 36 years, R/o Gadimundki, Kaikini Village, Bhatkal Taluk.(U.K). (By - Sri. S.M.N., Advocate for Plaintiffs) (By –Sri. I.M.N., Advocate for Defendant No.12) (Defendant No.1 to 11 Exparte) 3 O.S.NO.110/2017 Nature of the suit : Partition and separate Possession Date of: 1) Institution of suit : 13/11/2017 2) Recording of Evidence : 19/06/2019 3) Closing of Evidence : 22/10/2019 4) Pronouncing of Judgment : 05/08/2020 Total duration of the suit : Years -- Months -- Days 02 08 23 J U D G M E N T This is a suit filed by the plaintiffs against the defendants for partition and separate possession of 1/8th share in the suit schedule properties. 2. Brief facts of the case of the plaintiffs are as under: The plaintiffs are the brothers and are the legal heirs of deceased Durgamma Kom Jatta Naik. The plaintiffs and the defendants are the members of the Hindu undivided joint family and they are the legal heirs of Ira @ Irayya S/o Rama Naik. The suit schedule properties are the self acquired properties of grandfather of the plaintiffs by name Ira @ Irayya Rama Naik which are granted by the Land Tribunal by vide order No.LRM No.9/361. After his death, the properties have been transferred in the name of Masti Ira Naik, Rama Ira Naik, Madeva Ira Naik, Nagappa Ira Naik, Narayana Ira Naik, Devamma Kom Nagappa Naik, Durgamma Kom Jatta Naik and Nagamma Kom Sura Naik by way of inheritance by vide Varisa No.A673. After the death of husband of defendant No.1, his legal heirs i.e., defendant No.1 to 1 (f) have inherited the properties as per MR.No.3403/2003. Further it is stated that after the death of Rama S/o Ira Naik, the defendant No.2 to 5 have inherited the suit properties as per MR No.3498/2003. Similarly after the death of Nagappa Ira Naik, the defendant No.7 to 9 have inherited the suit properties as per MR.No.3557/2003, after the death of Narayana Ira Naik, the defendant No.10 and 11 have inherited
{'Name': 'Sri. Ganapathi S/o Jatta Naik', 'Address': 'Mallimane, Mannonda, Shirali-I Village, Bhatkal Taluk', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Sri. Krishna S/o Jatta Naik', 'Address': 'Mallimane, Mannonda, Shirali-I Village, Bhatkal Taluk', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Mastamma Kom Annappa Naik', 'Address': 'Gadimundki, Kaikini Village, Bhatkal Taluk', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
IN THE COURT OF THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, DHARWAD PRESENT Sri. Sanjay P. Gudagudi, M.A., LL.B. Prl. Senior Civil Judge & CJM, Dharwad Dated this the 16th day of January, 2021 Criminal Case No. 155/2017 Complainant : The State represented by Police Inspector, Traffic police station, Dharwad . -Vs ­ Accused : 1. Manjunath S/o Madivalappa Ganiger, Age: 34 years, Occ: Driver, R/o: Lokur, Tq: Dharwad. 2.Smt. Shobha W/o Yallappa Talawar, Age: 35 years, Occ: Household work, R/o: Lokur, Tq: Dharwad. 1.Date of commission of offence:11.05.2016 2.Date of reporting of offence :11.05.2016 3.Arrest of the accused :13.09.2017 4.Name of the complainant :Prabhakar S/o Basappa Konappanavar 5.Date of commencement of evidence:23.05.2018 6. Date of closing of evidence :06.01.2020 2 C.C. No. 155/2017 7. Offences complained u/sec :279, 304­A of I.PC and u/sec. 134(A) & (b) r/w/sec.187, 3 r/w/sec. 181, 5 r/w/sec. 180 of M.V Act. 8.Opinion of Judge :Accused are not found guilty 9.Complainant represented by :APP. 10.Accused defense by :Sri. V.N. Chikani, Advocate (SANJAY P. GUDAGUDI) Prl. Senior Civil Judge & CJM, Dharwad. : J U D G M E N T : This police report has been filed by the traffic police, Dharwad under Crime No. 99/2016 against the accused persons alleging that the accused persons committed offences punishable under sections 279, 304­A of I.P.C and u/sec. 134(A) & (B) r/w/sec. 187, 3 r/w/sec. 181 and 5 r/w/sec. 180 of the M.V. Act. 2. The substance of the case is as under: That on 11­05­2016 at about 1 p.m., near Presentation School on P.B. road of Dharwad, the accused No.1, without possessing a valid and effective D.L., drove a tractor bearing Reg. Contd..... 3 C.C. No. 155/2017 No. KA­25/TB­1022 connecting to a corn machine towards Dharwad city and jumped the tractor at a hump on the road and thereby, made one Manjunath Konappanavar to fall down from the tractor on the road, on whom wheel of a corn machine ran over. Due to the accident Manjunath died on the spot, while the accused fled away from the place without informing the police about the accident or providing any medical facility to the victim. The accused No.2, being owner of the vehicle, entrusted it to the accused No.1 to drive knowingly well that he did not possess valid D.L. to drive the vehicle. In this regard, C.W.1 gave first information statement to the police. 3. That after registering the complaint, Dharwad traffic police conducted investigation, visited the place of accident and drew mahazar. The inquest mahazar and P.M were conducted. The vehicle was seized and later given to the interim custody of the owner. The statements of the witnesses were recorded and after completion of the investigation, I.O filed the police report against the accused No s.1 and 2 alleging that they have committed the offences punishable under sections 279, 304­A of I.P.C and u/sec. 134(A) & (B) r/w/sec. 187, 3 r/w/sec. 181 and 5 r/w/sec. 180 of the M.V. Act. 4. The accused No s. 1 and 2 appeared through their counsel and they were supplied copies of the prosecution papers as per section 207 of Cr.P.C. The accused persons got released on bail. Contd.....
{'Name': 'The State represented by Police Inspector', 'Address': 'Traffic police station, Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Manjunath S/o Madivalappa Ganiger', 'Address': 'Lokur, Tq: Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Smt. Shobha W/o Yallappa Talawar', 'Address': 'Lokur, Tq: Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'accused'}
IN THE COURT OF LVII ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MAYOHALL UNIT, BENGALURU. (CCH­58) Present: Smt. K.G.Shanthi, B.Com, LL.M., LVII Addl.City Civil & Sessions Judge, Mayohall Unit, Bengaluru. Dated this the 23rd day of June, 2022. Original Suit No.26297/2021 Plaintiffs : 1) Mrs. Anupama Karal, D/o. P.Krishnadas, Aged about 37 years. 2) Mr. Saju Chengat, S/o. Mr.P.K.Raghavan, Aged about 40 years. (Both are r/at # 2048, Sobha Sunscape Thalaghattapura, Kanakapura Road, Bengaluru­560 0109.) (By Sri.H.V.Sunil Kumar Rao , Adv.) ­V/s­ Defendants: 1) Mr. Lokesh, S/o. Mr.Suresh, Aged about 39 years, No.37/6, 1st Main, Vinayaka Layout, Nagadevanahalli, Kengeri Hobli, Bengaluru­560 056. 2 O.S.No.26297/2021 2) Mr. Vinay Srishaila, S/o. Ramesh C.R.S., Aged about 46 years. 3) Mrs. Sushma H.P., W/o. Sri.Vinay Srishaila, Aged about 40 years. (D2 & D3 are r/at Flat No.3044, 4th Floor, Sunscape Block, Sobha Hill View Apartment, Nagegowdanapalya, Thalagattapura Post, Kanakapura Main Road, Bengaluru­560 062.) (Sri.Satish Kumar, N., Adv. for D2, D3, D1­ Exparte) Date of Institution of the suit 15.11.2021 Nature of the suit Declaration & Permanent Injunction Date of the commencement of recording of the evidence­­­ Date on which the Judgment was pronounced23.06.2022 Year/sMonth/sDays Total duration 000708 ********* JUDGMENT U/O.12 RULE 6 CPC The plaintiffs filed a suit against the defendants for declaration to declare that, they are absolute owners in 3 O.S.No.26297/2021 possession of the suit schedule property by virtue of sale deed dt.22.09.2014 and also sought for declaration that the sale deed dtd.18.06.2014 is null and void and not binding on the plaintiffs and also sought for consequential relief of permanent injunction. 2. It is stated by the plaintiffs that, they have purchased the suit schedule property for a valuable consideration amount from previous owners Sri.Vinay Srishaila and Smt.Sushma H.P. under registered sale deed dtd.22.09.2014, vide document No.JAY­1­04835­2014­15, Book­1, stored in C.D.No.JAYD 206, and registered in the office of the Sub­Registrar, Jayanagar, Bangalore. Accordingly, they are in actual physical possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property and khatha has been transferred in their names and Encumbrance Certificate issued on 05.05.2016. 3.It is stated that, originally the suit schedule property belonged to Sri.B.M.Mahadevaswamy, who has purchased the same from Bangalore Development
{'Name': 'Mrs. Anupama Karal', 'Address': '2048, Sobha Sunscape Thalaghattapura, Kanakapura Road, Bengaluru-560 0109', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Mr. Saju Chengat', 'Address': '2048, Sobha Sunscape Thalaghattapura, Kanakapura Road, Bengaluru-560 0109', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Mr. Lokesh', 'Address': 'No.37/6, 1st Main, Vinayaka Layout, Nagadevanahalli, Kengeri Hobli, Bengaluru-560 056', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Mr. Lokesh', 'Address': 'No.37/6, 1st Main, Vinayaka Layout, Nagadevanahalli, Kengeri Hobli, Bengaluru-560 056', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'Mr. Vinay Srishaila', 'Address': 'Flat No.3044, 4th Floor, Sunscape Block, Sobha Hill View Apartment, Nagegowdanapalya, Thalagattapura Post, Kanakapura Main Road, Bengaluru-560 062', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'Mrs. Sushma H.P.', 'Address': 'Flat No.3044, 4th Floor, Sunscape Block, Sobha Hill View Apartment, Nagegowdanapalya, Thalagattapura Post, Kanakapura Main Road, Bengaluru-560 062', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
IN THE COURT OF THE V ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC, SHIVAMOGGA. Present: SMT. POOJA.J, B.A., LL.B., L.L.M., V Addl Civil Judge & J.M.F.C., Shivamogga. Dated this 24 th day of December, 2020 C.C. NO.2251/2017 Complainant: State by P.S.I., of Tunganagara Police, Shivamogga. (By Learned APP) ­Vs­ Accused: Smt. Lakshmi W/o Late Prakash, 40 years, R/o Vinayakanagara, Doddibeelu, Shivamogga. (By Sri.Jayanth Kumar Advocate) 1.Date of commission of offence:02.02.2017 2.Offence compliance of :341, 504, 448, 427, 506 of IPC. 3.Name of the complainant:Smt. R. Manjula4.Date of filing of charge sheet:10.06.2017 5.Date of recording of Evidence:06.02.2019 6Date of pronouncement of Judgment:24.12.2020 7Opinion of the Judge :Acquittal J U D G M E N T The P.S.I. of Tunganagar Police Station, Shivamogga has filed the present charge sheet against the Accused for the offences punishable U/Sec. 448, 341, 504, 427, 506 of I.P.C. 2. Brief facts of the prosecution case is as follows: On 02.02.2017 at Vinayaka Nagara of Doddibeelu village, Shivamogga Taluk, accused wrongfully trespassed into the house of CW­1 and broken the house door and destroyed the walls and roof of the house and caused loss of Rs.70 to 80 thousand and picked up quarrel with CW­1 and wrongfully restrained CW­1 frommoving ahead and abused her in filthy language, so as to provoking her to break public peace and threatened CW­1 with dire consequences of life threat. Hence, a complaint was lodged by the informant Smt. R. Manjula against the accused which was registered in Crime No.89/2017 for the offences punishable U/Sec.448, 341, 504, 427, 506 of IPC. 3. After filing of the charge sheet as there were sufficient grounds to proceed against the accused, this Court has taken the cognizance for the offence punishable U/Sec.448, 341, 504, 427, 506 of IPC. After issuance of summons, the accused appeared before the court through her counsel and got enlarged on bail. The copy of the charge sheet and other prosecution papers were furnished to the accused person in compliance of Sec.207 of Cr.P.C. and she was heard before charge.
{'Name': 'State by P.S.I., of Tunganagara Police, Shivamogga', 'Address': 'Not available', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Smt. Lakshmi W/o Late Prakash', 'Address': 'Vinayakanagara, Doddibeelu, Shivamogga', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Smt. R. Manjula', 'Address': 'Not available', 'Party Name': 'complainants'}
KAKL600013312017 Presented on : 01-09-2017 Registered on : 01-09-2017 Decided on : 30-09-2021 Duration : 4 years, 0 months, 29 days IN THE COURT OF PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC SRINIV ASPUR AT Srinivaspur,KOLAR Presided Over by Sri. Devaraju H.R. O.S./347/2017 Exhibit No.: Plaintiff: Chalapathi Age: 42 Occupation : Address: S/o Venkatashami A/a 42 years R/at Bayyappalli Village, Ronur Hobli, Srinivaspura Taluk VERSUS Defendent: Venkatshappa Age: 50 Occupation : Address: S/o Chikka Venkataswamy A/a 50 years R/at Bayyapalli Village, Ronur Hobli, Srinivaspura Taluk 2:Venkataraanappa Age: 35 Occupation : S/o Venkateshappa A/a 35 years R/at Bayyappalli Village Ronur Hobli Srinivaspura Taluk 3:Narayanaswamy Age: 0 Occupation : S/o Venkateshappa A/a 30 years R/at Bayyappalli Village Ronur Hobli Srinivasapura Talu ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Advocate for Plaintiff: N.V .Konappa Advocate for Defendent: N.V . Jayaramegowda appearing for Venkatshappa: Advocate N.V . Jayaramegowda, N.V . Jayaramegowda appearing for 2, 3 respectively. Claim : JUDGMENT (Delivered on 30-09-2021) ORDER Both the parties are present before lok-adalath. As a result of conciliation plaintiff has filed memo and prays for dismiss the suit as not pressed by him. Peruse the memo and is allowed. In view of memo filed by the plaintiff, case is dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiff. Case is disposed off accordingly before lok-adalath. Date : 30-09-2021 (Sri. Devaraju H.R. ) PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC SRINIV ASPURVisit ecourts.gov.in for updates or download mobile app “ eCourts Services ” from Android or iOS
{'Name': 'Chalapathi', 'Address': 'S/o Venkatashami A/a 42 years R/at Bayyappalli Village, Ronur Hobli, Srinivaspura Taluk', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Venkatshappa', 'Address': 'S/o Chikka Venkataswamy A/a 50 years R/at Bayyapalli Village, Ronur Hobli, Srinivaspura Taluk', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Venkataraanappa', 'Address': 'S/o Venkateshappa A/a 35 years R/at Bayyappalli Village Ronur Hobli Srinivaspura Taluk', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Narayanaswamy', 'Address': 'S/o Venkateshappa A/a 30 years R/at Bayyappalli Village Ronur Hobli Srinivasapura Talu', 'Party Name': 'accused'}
1 MVC No. 288/2017 KABG700000832017 IN THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C. KHANAPUR. PRESENT Sri. P . Murali Mohan Reddy, B.A.L, LL.B., Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Khanapur. M.V.C.No. 288 /2017 Dated this the 27 th day of December , 202 1. Petitioners:- 1. Smt.Anusaya w/o Somanna Bamane, [Died during the course of proceedings– Her LR being petitioner No.2 is already on record ] 2. Shri.Mohan s/o Somanna Bamane, Age: 35 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o: Otoli, T al: Khanapur, Dist: Belagavi. (By Shri.K.G.Kallekar, Advocate) //V/s// Respondents:- 1. Shri.Almeda s/o Shimav Victar, Age: 50, Occ: Business, R/o: Manturga, T al: Khanapur, (Owner of vehicle bearing No.GA-01/T-4852). 2 MVC No. 288/2017 2. The General Manager, United India Insurance Company Ltd., Club Road, Belagavi, Dist: Belagavi. (Policy No.2401813116P101637180 valid from 06-05-2016 to 05-05-2017 Insurer of vehicle No.GA-01/T-4852). (R-1 by Shri.S.K.Nandgadi, Advocate R-2 by Shri.M.Y .Sanapuji, Advocate) JUDGMENT This is a petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act seeking compensation of ₹.20,00,000/- with interest at the rate of 18% p.a., in relation to the death of husband of petitioner No.1 and father of petitioner No.2 by name Somanna Irappa Bamane who succumbed in a Road Traffic Accident. During the pendency of the petition, petitioner No.1 died and her legal heir petitioner No.2 is already on record. 2)The case of the petitioners is as under:- On 20-05-2016, petitioner No.1’s husband and petitioner No.2’s father by name Somanna Irappa Bamane (herein after called as ‘Somanna’ for brevity ) was proceeding as a pillion rider along with rider in motorcycle bearing No.KA-22/X-5675 from Otoli to Khanapur village. At about 9-30 a.m, they reached near Ramgurwadi cross on Jamboti-Khanapur road. At that time, the driver of the 407 Goods T empo vehicle bearing No.GA-01/T-4852 ( herein after called as ‘Offending Vehicle’ for brevity ) came in rash / negligent manner and dashed to the said motorcycle. Due to which, the rider and Somanna fell on the ground. 3 MVC No. 288/2017 Somanna sustained multiple grievous injuries all over the body. 3) He was admitted to Civil hospital, Belagavi. During the the course of treatment, he succumbed to the injuries. Postmortem was conducted. After completion of all formalities, dead body was handed over to the petitioners for cremation. Petitioners have spent a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards medical expenses of the deceased . 4) Petitioners claimed that Somanna was hale and healthy prior to the accident. He was aged about 55 years at the time of accident. He was an agriculturist and also a contractor of supplying bricks from Khanapur to Goa. He was earning Rs.50,000/- per month. Accident occurred due to the rash / negligent driving of the driver of the offending vehicle. Respondent No.1 being the owner and respondent No.2 being the insurer of the said vehicle are jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation to the petitioners. 5)After service of notice to respondents No.1 and 2 appeared through their respective counsels. Inspite of affording opportunity, respondent No.1 has not filed his objections. Respondent No.2 has filed his objection. 6) Respondent No.2 in his objection has denied the entire case of petitioners. It is contended that there is inordinate and unexplained delay of 2 days in lodging the complaint. Accident in question occurred due to the rash / negligent riding of the motorcycle. Its rider was not holding valid and effective D.L. to ride the motorcycle. Petitioners, by colluding with police authorities, have falsely implicated
{'Name': 'Smt.Anusaya', 'Address': 'Otoli, Tal: Khanapur, Dist: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'plaintiffs'}{'Name': 'Shri.Mohan', 'Address': 'Otoli, Tal: Khanapur, Dist: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'plaintiffs'}{'Name': 'Shri.Almeda', 'Address': 'Manturga, Tal: Khanapur', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Shri.Almeda', 'Address': 'Manturga, Tal: Khanapur', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'The General Manager', 'Address': 'Club Road, Belagavi, Dist: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Shri.Almeda', 'Address': 'Manturga, Tal: Khanapur', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'The General Manager', 'Address': 'Club Road, Belagavi, Dist: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
KABG010029512018 IN THE COURT OF THE XI ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE & ADDL. MACT, BELAGAVI PRESENT Ramakant I. Chavan B.Com., LL.B.,(Spl.) XI Addl. District Judge & Addl. MACT, Belagavi MVC Nos.531/2018 & 2639/2017 Dated this the 2nd day of July, 2022 PETITIONERS IN MVC NO. 531/2018: 1.Smt. Rukmini W/o Raghunath Jadhav Age: 50 years, Occ: Household work 2.Miss Sarika D/o Raghunath Jadhav Age: 22 years, Occ: Student 3.Vishal S/o Raghunath Jadhav Age: 20 years, Occ: Mechanical work. All are R/o H.No.1850, Bapat Galli, Tq. & Dist. Belagavi. (By Shri K.J. Saravade, Advocate) PETITIONER IN MVC NO. 2639/2017: Smt. Shubhlaxmi W/o Subhash @ Balu Jadhav Age: 40 years, Occ: Household work, R/o H.No.1850, Bapat Galli, Belagavi.2 MVC.No.531/2018 & 2639/2017 (By Shri N.A. Solkhanpatil , Advocate) V/S COMMON RESPONDENTS IN BOTH CASES: 1.Suresh F. Shah Age: Major, Occ: Business R/o. Mahaveer Roadlines, H.No.386 Patil Galli, Tq. & Dist. Belagavi (Owner of vehicle No.KA-22/5039) Since deceased by his LRs- 1a.Sanjay Suresh Shah Age: Major, Occ: Business R/o. Mahaveer Roadlines, H.No.386 Patil Galli, Tq. & Dist. Belagavi 2.The Divisional Manager, Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co. Ltd., #6, 1st floor, Mujawar Arcade, No.6, Nehru Nagar, P.B. road, Belagavi. (Insurer of vehicle No.KA-22/5039) Policy No: VGC0260399000105 Valid from 21.1.2017 to 20.1.2018 3.Balkrishna S/o Maruti Pingat Age: 55 years, Occ: Business R/o. H.No.2072, Bhatkande Galli, Belagavi – 590001. (Owner of Motorcycle No.KA-22/EY-1349 ) Since deceased by his LRs- 3a.Maruti Yallappa Pingat Age: Major, Occ: Nil R/o. H.No.2072, Bhatkande Galli, Belagavi – 590001.3 MVC.No.531/2018 & 2639/2017 3b.Smt. Sunita W/o Maruti Pingat Age: Major, Occ: Household work R/o. H.No.2072, Bhatkande Galli, Belagavi – 590001. 3c.Smt. Pooja W/o Maruti Pingat Age: Major, Occ: Student R/o. H.No.2072, Bhatkande Galli, Belagavi – 590001. 4.The Divisional Manager, The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., 3933/B2, Mudalgi budilding, Club road, Belagavi -590001 Policy No: 68040031170300001260 Valid from 29.4.2017 to 28.4.2018 (Shri R.G. Morab, Adv for R1, Shri S.N. Chaugule , Adv for R2 Shri B.L. Takkekar, Adv for R3(atoc) Shri N.D. Mitbavakar, Adv for R4) COMMON JUDGMENT Facts in MVC. No. 531/2018: The petition is filed by the petitioners U/Sec. 166 of M.V. Act seeking compensation in respect of death of Vinayak Jadhav. They have sought for compensation of Rs.50.00 lakhs. 2.The substance of the case as per the petition is as under: On 10.12.2017 at about 11.30 in the night, the deceased along with his friends was proceeding on Motorcycle
{'Name': 'Smt. Rukmini', 'Address': 'H.No.1850, Bapat Galli, Tq. & Dist. Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Miss Sarika', 'Address': 'H.No.1850, Bapat Galli, Tq. & Dist. Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Vishal', 'Address': 'H.No.1850, Bapat Galli, Tq. & Dist. Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Smt. Shubhlaxmi', 'Address': 'H.No.1850, Bapat Galli, Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Suresh F. Shah', 'Address': 'Mahaveer Roadlines, H.No.386, Patil Galli, Tq. & Dist. Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Sanjay Suresh Shah', 'Address': 'Mahaveer Roadlines, H.No.386, Patil Galli, Tq. & Dist. Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'The Divisional Manager, Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co. Ltd.', 'Address': '#6, 1st floor, Mujawar Arcade, No.6, Nehru Nagar, P.B. road, Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Balkrishna S/o Maruti Pingat', 'Address': 'H.No.2072, Bhatkande Galli, Belagavi – 590001', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Maruti Yallappa Pingat', 'Address': 'H.No.2072, Bhatkande Galli, Belagavi – 590001', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Smt. Sunita W/o Maruti Pingat', 'Address': 'H.No.2072, Bhatkande Galli, Belagavi – 590001', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Smt. Pooja W/o Maruti Pingat', 'Address': 'H.No.2072, Bhatkande Galli, Belagavi – 590001', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'The Divisional Manager, The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.', 'Address': '3933/B2, Mudalgi budilding, Club road, Belagavi -590001', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}
IN THE COURT OF THE II ADDL. SESSIONS & SPECIAL JUDGE AT VIJAYAPURA PRESENT: Sri.G.D.Mahavarkar, M.A.,LL.B(Spl), M.L. (Lab & Indstrl Rlns & Adm. Laws), LL.M (Business Laws), M.Phil-in-Law (Juridical Science) II Addl. Sessions & Spl. Judge, Vijayapura. Dated this the 3 rd day of May 2021 Spl.Case(SC/ST).No.42/2017 Complainant:1) The State of Karnataka, Represented by it's Dy.S.P., Vijayapur. (By Public Prosecutor) Vs. Accused1) Yallappa S/o. Kallappa Walikar No's.1 to 8: Age: 27 years, 2) Santosh S/o. Kallappa Walikar Age: 23 years, 3) Parasappa S/o. Peerappa Walikar Age: 20 years, 4) Somappa S/o. Peerappa Walikar Age: 20 years, 5) Peerappa S/o. Ambanna Walikar Age:50 years, 6) Siddappa S/o. Shankrappa Walikar Age: 38 years, 7) Parasappa S/o. Shankrappa Walikar Age: 25 years, A-1 to A-7 are R/o: Inganal, Tq. & Dist: Vijayapur. 2 Spl.(SC/ST)C.No.42/2017 8) Kannappa S/o. Mahadev Pujari Age: 24 years, A-8 is R/o: Madhabavi, Tq: & Dist: Vijayapur. (By Sri.M.S.Kyadi, Advocate.) 1Date of commission of offenceOn 09.07.2017 2Date of report of offence On 15.07.2017 3Date of arrest of the accusedA-1, A-2, A-4, A-5, A-6, A-8 arrested on 13.08.2017. A-3 & A-7 arrested on 21.07.2017. 4Date of release of accused on bailA-3 & A-7 on 26.07.2017 A-1, A-2, A-4 to A-6 & A-8 obtained anticipatory-bail on 28.07.2017. 5Date of commencement of evidenceOn 19.04.2019 6Date of closing of evidenceOn 06.03.2021 7Name of the Complainant Jattepap S/o. Basappa Madar, R/o. Inganal, Tq: & Dist: Vijayapur. 8Offences complained of U/Secs.143, 147, 148,324, 504 & 506 R/w.Sec.149 of IPC & U/Secs.3(1)(r)(s) of The SC/ST P.A.Act. 3 Spl.(SC/ST)C.No.42/2017 9Date of Pronouncement of JudgmentOn 03-05-2021 10 Opinion of the Judge Guilt of the accused not found. 11 Order of Sentence As per final-order J U D G M E N T This is a charge-sheet filed by the Dy.S.P., Vijayapura leveling the charges against the above said accused No' s.1 to 8 for the commission of the offences punishable U/Secs.143, 147, 148, 324, 504 & 506 R/w.Sec.149 of IPC & U/Secs.3(1) (r) & (s) of The SC/ST (P.A.) Act, 1989 in connection with Vijayapura Rural P.S. Cr.No.163/2017. 2. The epitomized-facts of the allegations that are leveled against the above said accused in the charge-sheet run thus: On 09.07.2017 at about 6:00 p.m. in the evening, on the public road, in front of the house of the complainant Jatteppa, situated in Inganal village, the accused No's.1 to 8, in prosecution with common object, formed an unlawful
{'Name': 'The State of Karnataka', 'Address': "Represented by it's Dy.S.P., Vijayapur.", 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Yallappa S/o. Kallappa Walikar', 'Address': 'R/o: Inganal, Tq. & Dist: Vijayapur.', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Santosh S/o. Kallappa Walikar', 'Address': 'R/o: Inganal, Tq. & Dist: Vijayapur.', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Parasappa S/o. Peerappa Walikar', 'Address': 'R/o: Inganal, Tq. & Dist: Vijayapur.', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Somappa S/o. Peerappa Walikar', 'Address': 'R/o: Inganal, Tq. & Dist: Vijayapur.', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Peerappa S/o. Ambanna Walikar', 'Address': 'R/o: Inganal, Tq. & Dist: Vijayapur.', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Siddappa S/o. Shankrappa Walikar', 'Address': 'R/o: Inganal, Tq. & Dist: Vijayapur.', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Parasappa S/o. Shankrappa Walikar', 'Address': 'R/o: Inganal, Tq. & Dist: Vijayapur.', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Kannappa S/o. Mahadev Pujari', 'Address': 'R/o: Madhabavi, Tq: & Dist: Vijayapur.', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Jattepap S/o. Basappa Madar', 'Address': 'R/o. Inganal, Tq: & Dist: Vijayapur.', 'Party Name': 'complainants'}
IN THE COURT OF II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE & SPECIAL JUDGE, AT DAVANGERE PRESENT:­ SMT. S. NAGASHREE, B.A, L.L.M, II ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, DAVANAGERE. DATED THIS THE 06 th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2020 S.C. No.142 /2017 COMPLAINANT:­ State by Honnali police, (By Spl. Public Prosecutor, Davanagere) /Vs/ ACCUSED:­ 1)Manu S/o. Devanaika, 28 years, r/o. Araligoppa village, N.R. Pura, Chikmagalur, 2)Manjunatha S/o. Basavarajappa, 26 years, r/o. Sadashivapura village, Honnali taluk, 3)Ajay S/o. Kollabhovi, 21 years, r/o. Jail road, 1st cross, N.R. Pura, Chikmagalur. ( By Sri. L.D., Advocate ) * * * 1.Date of commission of offence:12.10.2015, 2.Date of report of occurrence:13.10.2015. 3.Name of the complainantSri. Chandrashekar.S S/o. Siddappa, r/o.Sasvehalli village,2 SC.No.142/2017 Honnali taluk, 4.Arrest & release of accusedAccused 1 to 3 are on bail. 5.Date of commencement of trial26.4.2018. 7.Date on which the evidence was closed31.10.2019. 8.Offences alleged U/s. 448 & 397 of IPC. 9.Opinion of the judge Accused 1 to 3 not found guilty of the aforesaid offence, and as per final order. * * * * * ­: J U D G M E N T :­ This is a charge sheet filed by C.P.I., Honnali Circle, Honnali, as against the accused 1 to 3 for the offences punishable U/Sec. 448 & 397 of IPC, in connection with Honnali Police Station Cr. No.278/2015. 2.The brief averments of the charge sheet are as follows :­ That on 12.10.2015 during day time A.1 to 3 have gone in a motorcycle near the house of the complainant / CW.1 and CW.4. On the very same day again during night hours they3 SC.No.142/2017 have gone in their motorcycle near the house of the complainant/CW.1 and stopped their motorcycle at a distance and by wearing a Monkey Cap and Hand Glouse, were armed with Sickle, and they were waiting in a bush beside the house. At about 11.30 PM when CW.1 came out of the house to put lock to the bike and while entering in to the house, A.1 to 3 all of a sudden have entered in to the house of the complainant and committed criminal trespass. Then A.1 & 2 have held CW.1 by his neck, and A.3 with a Sickle held CW.4, and threatened both of them to take their lives and demanded money and gold. When CW.1 & 4 told that they do not have any money, A.1 took the Bangles and Chain which were in the hands and neck of CW.4, and from the Almerah they took finger ring and 3 watches, A.2 took 2 mobile phones kept on the Sofa, and then they have threatened CW.1 & 4 and locked them from out side, and went away with gold ornaments and other articles from the house of CW.1. The accused while going in the motorcycle, as one mobile was not working and 3 watches were not working, have thrown them somewhere in the dark, and in a hurry the accused have dropped one ring and broken chain piece, and A.2 has taken away one mobile phone who sold it to CW.8, and A.1 with the
{'Name': 'State by Honnali police', 'Address': 'Davanagere', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Manu S/o. Devanaika', 'Address': 'Araligoppa village, N.R. Pura, Chikmagalur', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Manjunatha S/o. Basavarajappa', 'Address': 'Sadashivapura village, Honnali taluk', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Ajay S/o. Kollabhovi', 'Address': 'Jail road, 1st cross, N.R. Pura, Chikmagalur', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'State by Honnali police', 'Address': 'Davanagere', 'Party Name': 'complainants'}
1 COM.O.S.3211/2017 IN THE COURT OF LXXXII ADDL.CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, AT BENGALURU (CCH.83) THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 PRESENT: SRI.DEVARAJA BHAT.M., B.COM, LL.B., LXXXII ADDL.CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU. Com.O.S.No. 3211/2017 BETWEEN: M/s. Metro Cash & Carry India Private Limited, A company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office at Sy No. 26/3, ‘A’ Block, Ward No.9, Industrial Suburbs, Subramanyanagar, Bengaluru – 560 005, represented by its Head- Finance & Controlling Mr. Badari Prasad .T.S. : PLAINTIFF (Represented by M/s Poovayya & Co - Advocates) AND 2 COM.O.S.3211/2017 M/s Arambhan Hospitality Services Limited, (formerly known as Cawasji Beharamji, Catering Services Limited), A Company Incorporated under the Privisions of the Companies Act, 1956, having its Registered Office at 201/202, Benston, B Wing, Sherly Rajan Road, Bandra (W), Mumbai – 400 050. No. 17, Bahubali Building Road, Cawasji Patel Street, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001, represented by its Managing Director. : DEFENDANT (Defendant is represented by M/s Muchandi & Co , Advocates) Date of Institution of the suit 28.04.2017 Nature of the suit (suit on pronote, suit forSuit for recovery of money under Order XXXVII of Civil Procedure 3 COM.O.S.3211/2017 declaration & Possession, Suit for injunction etc.)Code Date of commencement of recording of evidence- Date of First Case Management Hearing - Not held - Time taken for disposal from the date of Conclusion of Arguments 14 days Date on which judgment was pronounced18.02.2022 Total Duration Year/s Month/s Day/s 04 09 21 (DEVARAJA BHAT.M), LXXXII Addl.City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru. J U D G M E N T This is a suit under Order XXXVII of Civil Procedure Code filed by the Plaintiff against the Defendant for recovery of Rs.6,40,97,104/- along with future interest @ 18% from the date of suit till the date of realization. 2. The contentions of the Plaintiff in brief are as follows:- That the Plaintiff is a part of the Metro AG Wholesale & Food Specialist Company, which is a global pioneer in Cash &
{'Name': 'M/s. Metro Cash & Carry India Private Limited', 'Address': 'Sy No. 26/3, ‘A’ Block, Ward No.9, Industrial Suburbs, Subramanyanagar, Bengaluru – 560 005', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'M/s Arambhan Hospitality Services Limited', 'Address': '201/202, Benston, B Wing, Sherly Rajan Road, Bandra (W), Mumbai – 400 050', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
1 O.S.NO.99/2017 IN THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC, MUDALAGI, AT : MUDALAGI PRESENT: Sri.Suresha S.N . B.A.LLB. Civil Judge & JMFC, Mudalagi. DATE OF JUDGEMENT: 20th day of March 2021 O.S.NO.99/2017 1. Ravi S/o Balappa Pujeri Age:35yrs, Occ:Military Service (Maratha Light infantry Regiment Center) C.Co. (Charlie Company) R/o Honakuppi, Tq.Gokak, Now at Belagavi. ...Plaintiff. (By Sri.S.B.Koujalagi, Advocate) Vs. 1 Mahendra S/o Balappa Pujeri Age:30yrs, Occ:S.K.S. Micro Finance, Chikkodi On duty at Honakuppi, Tq.Gokak 2. Smt.Shruti W/o Mahendra Pujeri Age:28yrs, Occ:Household. R/o Honakuppi, Tal.Gokak. ...Defendants. (By Sri.L.B.Wader, Advocate) 2 O.S.NO.99/2017 Date of Institution : 23-06-2017 Nature of Suit : Declaration & Injunction Date of commencement of recording of evidence. : 17-01-2019 Date of Judgment : 20-03-2021 Duration : Yrs Mths Ds 03 08 27 ---- JUDGMENT The Plaintiff has filed this suit for declaration that he is the owner of the suit property and consequential relief of possession of suit property. 2. The brief facts of the Plaintiffs case are as under. The suit property the house property and an open space bearing VPC No.458 situate at Honakuppi measuring 20' x 22' out of this 10' x 12' is a house and remaining is open space with boundaries, EastHouse of Pandappa Hegadeppa Hegade West House of Sadeppa Rangappa Sorannavar SouthBy Road NorthBy house of Basappa Vyapari. It is contended that one Kutubusab S/o Goussab Nadaf of Honakuppi was the owner of suit property. He was in need of 3 O.S.NO.99/2017 money to meet out the expenses of his family and to pay off hand loans etc. So he sold suit property in favour of Plaintiff on 16-05-2003 and since then he is in possession of the suit property. This being the state of affairs, he is serving in military and he married one Pooja in the year 2005. She lived with plaintiff for some time and left his company and started residing with mother of Plaintiff and Defendant No.1 and he allowed his wife, mother and Defendant No.1 to live in the suit property. Plaintiff further submitted that his wife filed maintenance case, criminal case and other cases against him. The defendant No.1 is helping his wife in all the litigations. This being the case, since 2011 he has not gone to Honakuppi. He learn in the month of May 2017 that Defendant No.1 has illegally entered his name to the suit property and he is intending to sell the suit property. So he approached the Defendant No.1 and told him not to sell the suit property and vacate the suit property but Defendant No.1 refused to do so saying that he is the owner of the suit property. The Defendant No.1 though he is not having right, title or interest in the suit property, he is intending to sell the suit property. Even advise of elders in this regard went in vain. 3. After service of suit summons, the Defendant No.1 appeared through his counsel and filed his Written Statement. The Defendant No.2 adopted the Written Statement of
{'Name': 'Ravi S/o Balappa Pujeri', 'Address': 'Honakuppi, Tq.Gokak, Now at Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Mahendra S/o Balappa Pujeri', 'Address': 'Honakuppi, Tq.Gokak', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'Smt.Shruti W/o Mahendra Pujeri', 'Address': 'Honakuppi, Tal.Gokak', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
BEFORE THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL-XII, AT BALLARI. PRESENT: SRI. KASHIM CHURIKHAN, B.A, LL.M., MEMBER, MACT-XII, BALLARI. DATED THIS 11th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 MVC.No:557/2016 PETITIONER: Mahesh S/o Ramalingappa, aged about 32 years, Ex-Lorry Cleaner, R/o Pothanl village, Manvi Taluk, Raichur District, presently residing at Vinayaka Nagar, Contonment, Ballari. //Vs// RESPONDENTS: 1.Zakir S/o Khasim Sab, aged about 40 years, Driver of the Lorry bearing Reg. No. AP-21/V- 1357, R/o Sindhanur, now residing care of Shekhanna, SindhigiCompound, Raghavendra Talkies Road, Ballari. 2.Mukthiyar Ahamed S/o Nazeer Ahamed , aged about 45 years, Owner of the Lorry bearing Reg. No. AP-21/V-1357, R/o Care of P. Chand Basha S/o P.Buden Sab, Flower Street, Bangalore Road, Ballari. 3.M/S National Insurance Company Ltd., Ballari. CLAIM: The petitioner has filed the Petition U/s.166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1989 Praying to award compensation of 2 MVC No. 557/2016 Rs.5,75,000/- with costs and interest from the date of the accident till the date of realization as against the respondents, who had sustained injuries in an accident, which took on 09.06.2008 at about 11.00 a.m., near Ramasagar Gate, on S.H. 19 road, due to rash and negligent driving by the 1st respondent, driver of the Lorry bearing Reg. No. AP-21/V-1357, respondent No.1 being the driver, Respondent No.2 being the owner and respondent No.3 being the insurer of the said vehicle. Cause of action arose on : 09.06.2008 Application was filed on : 17.06.2016 Court fee paid : Rs.10/- COMPROMISE DECREE:- Both parties have filed joint memo before me for final disposal in the presence of Sri. B.Paul Pakkirappa, Advocate for the claim petitioner, petition against respondent No.1 is dismissed, Respondent No.2 is palced Exparte and Sri.T.Jeevan Babu, advocate for Respondent No.3 for settlement, perused the joint memo filed by the petitioner and respondent No.3 and the same is read over and explained to both parties. Both parties are admitted and accepted terms of joint memo, it is ordered that, the claim of the petitioner is allowed as prayed for in joint memo by granting a decree awarding compensation of Rs.55,000/-(Rupees Fifty five thousand 3 MVC No. 557/2016 only) as full and final settlement and the petitioner is fully satisfied. It is further ordered and decreed that , the respondent No.3 shall deposit award amount in account of petitioner within one month from date of this order if fails it shall carry interest 9% p.a from date of order till its realization. Advocate for petitioner is directed to furnish the bank account particulars to the Advocate for respondent No.3. [[ It is further ordered and decreed that, after deposit of award amount the petitioner is entitled to recive entire amount. [[ Further it is ordered and decreed that, the petitioner is not entitled for any cost. Further it is ordered and decreed that, Joint Memo is part and parcel of the award. Given under my hand and seal of this Court, on 11th day of February 2021. Member, MACT-XII, Ballari. Compromise award drafted on: 20.02.2022 Compromise award signed on: 22.02.2022 Member, MACT-XII, Ballari.
{'Name': 'Mahesh S/o Ramalingappa', 'Address': 'R/o Pothanl village, Manvi Taluk, Raichur District, presently residing at Vinayaka Nagar, Contonment, Ballari', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Zakir S/o Khasim Sab', 'Address': 'R/o Sindhanur, now residing care of Shekhanna, SindhigiCompound, Raghavendra Talkies Road, Ballari', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Zakir S/o Khasim Sab', 'Address': 'R/o Sindhanur, now residing care of Shekhanna, SindhigiCompound, Raghavendra Talkies Road, Ballari', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Mukthiyar Ahamed S/o Nazeer Ahamed', 'Address': 'R/o Care of P. Chand Basha S/o P.Buden Sab, Flower Street, Bangalore Road, Ballari', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'M/S National Insurance Company Ltd.', 'Address': 'Ballari', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Zakir S/o Khasim Sab', 'Address': 'R/o Sindhanur, now residing care of Shekhanna, SindhigiCompound, Raghavendra Talkies Road, Ballari', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'Mukthiyar Ahamed S/o Nazeer Ahamed', 'Address': 'R/o Care of P. Chand Basha S/o P.Buden Sab, Flower Street, Bangalore Road, Ballari', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'M/S National Insurance Company Ltd.', 'Address': 'Ballari', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
BEFORE THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL-II VIJAYAPURA PRESENT: Joshi Venkatesh, B.A.,LL.B.,(Spl) Member, M.A.C.T.II & I Addl. District Judge Vijayapura. Dated this: 03 rd day of March 2021 MVC No. 1607/2008 Petitioner : Sangeeta W/o Mallanna Sajjan, Age: 25 years, Occ: Garment Factory Worker, Silver Crest Clothing Pvt. Ltd., EOI Unit No.II, Bangalore, R/o Bangalore, Permanent at Chatnalli, Now at Kanadas Badavane, Bijapur. (By Sri. S.S.S., Adv) /// Versus /// Respondents : 1) M. Mahammad Usman S/o M. Maridshaha, Age: 50 years, Occ: Vehicle Onwer, R/o Near Ayyappa T emple, Tq: Attibele, Bangalore District. 2) The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Co.Ltd., SS Front Road, Bijapur. (R-1 Ex-parte) (R-2 by Sri MBS Adv.) ****** J U D G M E N T Injured/Petitioner filed this claim petition U/Sec.166 of MV Act, claiming compensation of Rs.12,00,000/- for the injuries suffered by her in the Motor Vehicle Accident occurred on 04.08.2008 at about 1.45 p.m. on Sarjapur- Attibele main road, Opp: Silver Crest clothing Pvt., Ltd., EOI Unit No.II, Bangalore, in the interest of justice and equity. 2.It is pleaded in the petition that Petitioner was working under Silver Crest Clothing Private Limited, Bangalore. She went to company work. After finishing company work, petitioner was returning to the factory, at that time while crossing the road on 04.08.2008 at about 1.45 p.m. on Sarjapur-Attibele main road, Opp: Silver Crest clothing Pvt., Ltd., EOI Unit No.II, Bangalore, Truck bearing No.KA-02- 9536 driven by its driver came in rash and negligent manner without following traffic rules, dashed to the injured/petitioner. Due to which petitioner sustained head injury and other injuries to all over the body. After accident factory authorities admitted her to NIMHANS Hospital, Bangalore. She was unconscious. Then she was admitted to Victoria Hospital. Later at Govt. Hospital Gulbarga. Her right side of the body was completely paralyzed. For2 MVC No.1607/2008 further treatment she was referred to Dr. Bhagavati Nuero Care Center, Bijapur. She taken MRI report. For the injuries suffered by petitioner she has to take longer treatment for recovery as per the advise of Doctor. She is still under physiotherapy treatment. As on the date of accident petitioner was hale and healthy. She was aged of 25 years and earning Rs.10,000/- per month by doing Garment company work and T ailoring work at home. Because of the accident she is unable to read and write, as such she is putting thumb impression in the place of her signature. Since her right side body was paralyzed, she lost her earning capacity. She is the only earning member of the family. Due to accident condition of petitioner is very critical. She suffered great loss. Accident occurred due to negligence of the Truck driver. Respondent No.1 is the owner of the Truck and respondent No.2 is insurer as on the date and time of accident. Hence, both are jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation to the petitioner. 3.Respondent no.1 fails to appear before the court. Hence respondent No.1 placed ex-parte.3 MVC No.1607/2008
{'Name': 'Sangeeta W/o Mallanna Sajjan', 'Address': 'Bangalore, R/o Bangalore, Permanent at Chatnalli, Now at Kanadas Badavane, Bijapur', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'M. Mahammad Usman', 'Address': 'Near Ayyappa Temple, Tq: Attibele, Bangalore District', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'The Branch Manager', 'Address': 'SS Front Road, Bijapur', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}
1 Com.OS.No.9257/2013 IN THE COURT OF LXXXII ADDL.CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE,AT BENGALURU (CCH.83) THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 PRESENT: SRI.DEVARAJA BHAT.M.,B.COM,LL.B., LXXXII ADDL.CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU. Com.OS No.9257/2013 BETWEEN: M/s. Ramesh Kumar & Co., A proprietorship concern duly represented by its Proprietor: Mr. Ramesh Chugh S/o late J.S.Chugh, aged about 66 years, previously having its Office at No.151, Transport Center, Rohtak Road, Delhi – 110 035 and presently at: No.G-236, Naraina Vihar, New Delhi – 110 022. : Plaintif (Represented by Sri. B.S.Satyanand – Advocate) AND M/s HMT Watches2 Com.OS.No.9257/2013 Limited, A Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, & a wholly owned Subsidiary of HMT Limited, Having its Registered Office at: No.59, Bellary Road, Bangalore -560 032, duly represented by its: General Marketing Manager (watches). : Defendant (Defendant is represented by Sri. Sanath Kumar Shetty - Advocate) Date of Institution of the suit19.12.2013 Nature of the suit (suit on pronote, suit for declaration & Possession, Suit for injunction etc.)Suit for recovery of money Date of commencement of recording of evidence28.9.2015 Date of First Case Management Hearing Not held (transferred suit) Time taken for disposal from the date of conclusion of arguments 23 days Date on which judgment was pronounced 26.03.20213 Com.OS.No.9257/2013 Total Duration Year/s Month/s Day/s 07 03 07 (DEVARAJA BHAT.M), LXXXII Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru. J U D G M E N T Suit of the Plaintiffs is for recovery of Rs.1,09,46,397/- with future interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the Defendant. 2. The contentions of the Plaintiff in brief are as follows:- That the Defendant entered into an agreement with the Plaintiff on 21.9.2001, for a period of 3 years from 2001 to 2004 which was extended upto 31.5.2005, that as per the agreement, the Defendant appointed the Plaintiff as its Clearing, Warehousing, Packing & Dispatching Agent, for its products in Delhi (herein after referred as C & F Agent) on certain terms and conditions, that accordingly an Agreement came into force w.e.f. 1.6.2001 and was to remain in operation for a period of three years, that the said agreement was renewable by mutual consent of the parties, that the Defendant continued to employ the services of Plaintiff as C & F agent for all these years and the Defendant is legally bound to
{'Name': 'M/s. Ramesh Kumar & Co.', 'Address': 'No.G-236, Naraina Vihar, New Delhi – 110 022', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'M/s HMT Watches Limited', 'Address': 'No.59, Bellary Road, Bangalore -560 032', 'Party Name': 'accused'}
IN THE COURT OF THE XXVI ADDL. CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, AT MAYO HALL, BENGALURU (CCH.20) Present: Sri.D.S.Vijaya Kumar, B.Sc, LL.B., XXVI Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Dated this the 4th day of December, 2021. Crl.Misc.No.26230/2021 Petitioner / Accused No.3:-Baba Ali Khan, S/o Late Abdul Azeem Khan, Aged about 47 years, Residing at No. 48, Flat No.07, 1st Floor, Hanumanthappa Road, Sonangi Layout, R.S.Palya, Bengaluru 560 033 [By Sri.N.K.J-Advocate]. Vs. Respondent The State of Karnataka, By Commercial Street Police Station, Bengaluru [By Public Prosecutor] O R D E R The Petitioner has filed this petition under section 438 of the Cr.P.C. praying for granting an order of anticipatory bail in respect of the offences alleged2 Crl.Misc.No.26230/2021 under sections-420, 465, 468, 471, 120B read with sec. 34 of the Indian Penal Code, in crime No.121/2021 of Commercial Street Police Station. 2. Brief facts of the bail petition are as under:- On the basis of the reference made in PCR No.52185/2021, the Respondent Police have registered a case in Crime No.121/2021 for the alleged offences under sections-420, 465, 468, 471, 120B read with sec. 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Now, based on the false complaint, Respondent Police are making attempt to arrest him in the case. It is also stated that, the Petitioner is very much innocent about the alleged complaint allegations. He has deep roots in the society and if he is arrested, he will be subjected to harassment as a false case has been registered against3 Crl.Misc.No.26230/2021 him. Offences are not punishable with imprisonment for life or death. The Petitioner undertakes to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by the court. Hence, on these grounds, Petitioner has sought for granting an order of Anticipatory bail by allowing this bail petition. 3. Objection filed by the prosecution to the petition is as under: On the basis of the reference made by the Learned Magistrate in PCR No.52185/2021, Respondent Police have registered a case in Crime No.121/2021 for the offences punishable under sections-420, 465, 468, 47, 120B read with sec.34 of the Indian Penal Code against the Accused persons. As could be seen from the complaint, in Crime No.121/2021 of Commercial Street Police Station, which is registered for the above
{'Name': 'The State of Karnataka', 'Address': 'By Commercial Street Police Station, Bengaluru', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Baba Ali Khan', 'Address': 'S/o Late Abdul Azeem Khan, Aged about 47 years, Residing at No. 48, Flat No.07, 1st Floor, Hanumanthappa Road, Sonangi Layout, R.S.Palya, Bengaluru 560 033', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'The State of Karnataka', 'Address': 'By Commercial Street Police Station, Bengaluru', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}
IN THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC KALAGHATAGI Present Smt. Dakshayini G K, B.Sc. LL.B., Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Kalaghatagi Dated this the 1 st day of March, 2021 C.C.No.155/2015 Complainant:The State R/by P.I., Kalaghatagi Police Station, Kalaghatagi. (By Assistant Public Prosecutor) Vs Accused: Pandurang s/o Akash Hunje, Age: 21 years, occ: driver, R/o: Sumthan, Tq: Shiror Anakpal, Dist: Lahor, State: Maharastra. (By Sri. G.B.P., Advocate) Date of occurrence of offence : 04.04.2014 Date of report of offence : 04.04.2014 Date of arrest of accused : 07.04.2014 Date of commencement of : 06.12.2018 recording evidence Date of closing of evidence : 01.02.2021 Offences complained of :U/sec. 279,337,338, 304(A) of IPC & 134 r/w.187 of M.V. Act. Opinion of the Judge : Accused not found guiltyC.C.No.155/2015 2 J U D G M E N T The Police Inspector, Kalaghatagi Police Station has filed charge sheet against the accused person for the offences punishable u/sec. 279, 337, 338, 304(A) of IPC and 134 r/w.187 of M.V. Act. 2.The prosecution case in brief are as follows: On 4.4.2014 at about 2.30 p.m. in the intervening midnight at Satusayyad cross on Hubballi-Karwar N.H. road within the jurisdiction of Kalaghatagi police station, accused person being a driver of lorry bearing No. MH-42/T-0357 drove the same in rash and negligent manner so as to endangerous to the human life and safety of others from Hubballi towards Karwar and dashed against two bullock carts proceeding from Hubballi towards Karwar as a result, two bullock carts broken down and one Misba @ Jinat D/o Saleem Hajresab Jangli and another Sayeda Begum D/o Sayyadsab Bijapuri died on the spot and the inmates of said bullock carts CW.9 to 14 and 17 sustained simple injuries and CW.15 and 16 sustained severe injuries in the said accident. The accused persons ran away from the place of accident without intimating the accident to the nearest police station and thereby the accused person has committed the aforesaid offences. C.C.No.155/2015 3 3.On the complaint lodged by complainant, P.I., Kalaghatagi police station has registered FIR against the accused person and after completion of investigation filed charge sheet against the accused person for the aforesaid offences. 4.After taking cognizance for the aforesaid offences, in response to summons, accused person appeared before the court and he was enlarged on bail. The prosecution papers were furnished to the accused person as required u/sec.207 of Cr.P.C. Plea recorded and read over to the accused person in the language known to him. The accused person not pleaded guilty and claims for trial. Hence, the case is posted for recording of prosecution side evidence. 5.In order to prove the guilt of the accused person, the prosecution in all got examined thirteen witnesses as PW.1 to PW.13 and got marked documents as Ex.P.1 to Ex.P.31. 6. Accused person was examined under Sec. 313 of Cr.P.C, he denied all the incriminating evidence appeared against him further not chosen to lead defence evidence. 7. Heard the arguments of learned APP and learned counsel for the defence. 8. The points that arisen my consideration are as follows: 1.Whether the prosecution proves beyond all reasonable doubt that On 4.4.2014 at
{'Name': 'The State', 'Address': 'Kalaghatagi Police Station, Kalaghatagi', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Pandurang s/o Akash Hunje', 'Address': 'Sumthan, Tq: Shiror Anakpal, Dist: Lahor, State: Maharastra', 'Party Name': 'accused'}
IN THE COURT OF II ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, AND MEMBER OF ADDL.MACT, BELAGAVI AT: BELAGAVI Dated this 26th day of March, 2021 PRESENT: Shri Nanjundaiah G. M.A. , LL.B.,(Spl) II Addl. Dist. & Sessions Judge, Belagavi MVC No.1146/2017 Shri. Annappa S/o Appanna Dhanagar, Age: 32 years, Occ: Driver,Now Nil, R/o Nilaji village, Tq.Dist: Belagavi. ....Petitioner (By Shri.S.R.Kamate, Advocate) - Vs- 1.Shri.R.Shivasankar S/o Ramasamy, Age: Major, Occ: Business, R/o No.10, S.S.S.Building, A.V.Road, Chamarajpet, Bengaluru, 21, Near Ayyappa Temple, Attibele, Anekal, Tq.Bangaluru. (Owner of Bore-Well Truck No. KA-51/MD-8777) 2.The Divisional Manager, National Insurance Co.Ltd., 1732, Ramdev Galli, Belagavi, (Insurer of Bore-Well Truck No.2 MVC No.1146/2017 KA-51/MD-8777) …..Respondents (R1: By Exparte, R2: By Sri.V.S.Prabhu, Advocate) JUDGEMENT This petition is filed under the provision of section 166 of M.V.Act, 1988 seeking compensation for the injuries caused in a road traffic accident. 2. The petition averments in brief are that : It is contended that on 20.5.2017 at 20.40 hours, when the petitioner was proceeding in Tempo bearing No.KA-22/C-5439 by driving the Tempo from Halakarni towards Sankeshwar in a moderate speed with proper care and caution on his correct left side of the road and when the petitioner came near the spot of accident i.e., on Sankeshwar Halakarni road, in front of Tahasildar Petrol Pump, within the limits of Halakarni, at that time, one I-10 Car bearing No.Mh-09/DM-9964 was proceeding ahead of the petitioner's Tempo, which was driven by its driver in a rash and negligent manner with recklessly, suddenly applied the brake and while petitioner yet to apply brake of this tempo, at that time, Bore-well truck bearing No.KA- 51/MD-8777 came from Halakarni, which was driven by3 MVC No.1146/2017 its driver in a rash and negligent manner, dashed to petitioner's Tempo driver side and caused the accident. Due to this heavy impact, the petitioner has sustained grievous injuries. Immediately after the accident, the petitioner was shifted to Hattarki Hospital, Gadhingalaj and admitted as an in patient from 20.5.2017 to 03.06.2017 and during this period has undergone operation and he is still under treatment and so far he has spent Rs.100,000/- towards medical and other incidental expenses. The petitioner was hale and healthy prior to the accident and aged 32 years at the time of accident and he was doing driver work by profession and earning Rs.15,000/- p.m., and out of the said earnings, he was maintaining his family. But, due to accidental injuries, petitioner has become permanently disabled, lost earning capacity, avocation, enjoyment of life. The petitioner has sufferred mentally, physically and financially. The accident in question is caused solely due to rash and negligent driving of driver of Bore-Well Truck No.KA- 51/MD-8777, so the respondent No.1 and 2 are jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation. Hence, the petitioner has filed this present claim petition seeking compensation of Rs.12,00,000/- together with interest and
{'Name': 'Shri. Annappa S/o Appanna Dhanagar', 'Address': 'Nilaji village, Tq.Dist: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Shri.R.Shivasankar S/o Ramasamy', 'Address': 'No.10, S.S.S.Building, A.V.Road, Chamarajpet, Bengaluru, 21, Near Ayyappa Temple, Attibele, Anekal, Tq.Bangaluru', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'The Divisional Manager, National Insurance Co.Ltd.', 'Address': '1732, Ramdev Galli, Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Bore-Well Truck No. KA-51/MD-8777', 'Address': 'Address not specified', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
1 ECA NO.4 TO 6 of 2017 IN THE COURT OF I ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, GOKAK AT GOKAK PRESENT SRI SATISH J. BALI, B.Com. LL.M. I ADDL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, GOKAK Dated: 21st day of October­2020 ECA Nos.4 TO 6/2017 1. Basavaraj Hanumanth Khakandaki @ Kakanki, Age: 22 years, Occ: Coolie or Hamali, R/o.Mugalakhod, Tq: Raibag. ….Petitioner in ECA NO.4/17 1. Laxman Savalappa Mangasuli, Age: 25 years, Occ: Coolie or Hamali, R/o.Mugalakhod, Tq: Raibag. ….Petitioner in ECA NO.5/17 1. Yallappa S/o. Mallappa Mudhol, Age: 22 years, Occ: Coolie, R/o.Mugalakhod, Tq: Raibag. ….Petitioner in ECA NO.6/17 (R/by Sri. S.M.H., Adv.) And:­ 1.Mallappa Gangappa Yaradatti, Age: Major, Occ: Business, R/o.Mugalkhod, Tq: Raibag. (Owner of Goods vehicle bearing NO.KA­23/a­6988) 2.United India Insurance Co., Ltd., By its Senior Divisional Manager, Maruti Galli, Belagavi. (Policy No.2410013116P100578922) Validity from 29­04­2016 to 28­04­2017) 2 ECA NO.4 TO 6 of 2017 3.Arjun Ningappa Sannakki, Age: Major, Occ: KEB contractor, R/o.3rd cross, Vivekanand Nagar, Gokak. 4.National Insurance Co., Ltd., By its Senior Divisional Manager, Ramdev Galli, Belagavi. (Policy No.610201411510000009) (valid from 29­03­2016 to 28­03­2017) ....Common Respondents in All cases. (Sri D.P.L., Adv. for respondent No.1) (Sri O.B.J., Adv. for respondent No.2) (Sri L.M.P., Adv. for respondent No.3) (Sri B.B.P., Adv. for respondent No.4) ­:COMMON JUDGMENT:­ The petitioners have filed these claim petitions Under Section 22 of Workman’s Compensation Act, 1923 claiming compensation on account of injuries sustained by them during the course and arising out of employment with Respondent No.1 and principal employer Respondent No.3. 2.Since these three petitions arise out of the same accident for the purpose of convenience in recording evidence, appreciation, they are clubbed together and disposed off by this common judgment. 3.The petitioners were aged about 22, 25 and 22 years at the time of accident respectively. The petitioners were 3 ECA NO.4 TO 6 of 2017 working as labourers or Hamal's on the Truck bearing Registration No.KA­23/A­6988 of Respondent No.1. 4.It is submitted that, the Respondent No.3 is the KEB (HESCOM) Contractor and taking electrical contract works like erection of electrical poles, joining electrical wires and erection of TC etc. Further Respondent No.3 used to take the goods vehicle on hire basis from different persons for lifting and dumping electrical poles, TC and other electrical materials. Accordingly, Respondent No.3 has engaged the Respondent No.1's above said vehicle on hire basis and petitioners and others were engaged as labourers or coolies for lifting and dumping of electrical materials from one place to another, wherever the Respondent No.3 undertakes the contract works. 5.It is submitted that, the petitioners were working as labourers under Respondent No.1 whose vehicle bearing No.KA­23/A­6988 was engaged for the works of Respondent No.3. Therefore, there is a relationship of the employer and employee between the petitioners and Respondent No.1. Further there is also a relation of principal employer and employee between Respondent No.3 and petitioners.
{'Name': 'Yallappa', 'Address': 'R/o.Mugalakhod, Tq: Raibag', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}
1 Misc.No.4/2011 IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HUMNABAD PRESENT :: SARASWATHI DEVI B.Com., LL.B., (Spl) Senior civil Judge and JMFC, Humnabad Civil MISC. No. 4/2011 Dated this the 5th day of March-2021. Petitioner: The Thasildar, Humnabad. Humnabad. (By Assistant Govt. Pleader) -Vs- Respondent: Sakharam S/o Manikrao Chawan Age Major, Occ: Business R/o Humnabad Tq. Humnabad, Dist. Bidar. (Respondent by Sri. D.Mahadevappa. Adv) O R D E R 1.The petitioner has filed this petitioner under section 5 of The Limitation Act, to condone the delay of 2 months 20 days in filing the appeal against the judgment and decree in O.S.No.11/1997 dated 16-02-2004. The said application is accompanied by the affidavit of then Thasildar Humnabad. 2.That one Subhash and others had filed a suit in O.S.No.11/1997 against the Thasildar and another for2 Misc.No.4/2011 mandatory injunction. Under that suit they had sought to direct the defendant No.1 to sanction the mutation and issue directions to prepare the Form No.10 in respect of the land Sy.No.205 measuring 3 acres 20 guntas of Humnabad. In that suit both the defendants had appeared and contested the suit. Thereafter, the suit was decreed by the Prl. Civil Judge Humnabad on 16-02-2004 and mandatory injunction was granted directing the defendant No.1 to sanction mutation as prayed for by the plaintiffs and forward the “C” Form to the ADLR for preparing the Form No.10 in the name of the plaintiff No.4 Sakaram. 3.Being aggrieved the said decree, the T ahsildar Humnabad who was the defendant No.1 in that suit, had preferred an appeal before Sr. Civil Judge Basavkalyan camp at Humnabad on 18- 6-2004. Along with the appeal memo, he also had filed an application U/S 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 2 months 20 days in filing the appeal. Since there was delay the court had registered the case as Misc.No.20/2004. In that case, on service of notice the respondent who is the plaintiff No.4 in the trial court, had appeared through advocate. He had filed objections to the delay condonation application. 3 Misc.No.4/2011 4.Thereafter, on the establishment of the Sr. Civil Judge at Humanbad, this case was transferred to this court and renumbered as Misc.No.4/2011. The records reveal that, since no arguments were advanced by both the sides, my predecessor in office on 17-12-2011 had dismissed the application filed U/S 5 of the Limitation Act, and consequently the appeal filed U/S 96 CPC also came to be dismissed. 5.Being aggrieved by that order the petitioner had filed a second appeal in RSA No.7270/2013 before the Hon'ble High Court of Karantaka Kalaburgi Bench. In that appeal the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka by the judgment dated 23- 12-2020 has set aside the order passed by this court on 17- 12-2011 and remanded the matter to this court to pass orders afresh, after affording opportunity to both the parties. The said appeal was allowed on cost of Rs.10,000/- payable by the petitioner to the plaintiff/respondent within 3 months from the date of the receipt of this judgment. 6.The file along with judgment was received by this court on 29- 1-2021. Immediately the case was restored to its original
{'Name': 'Sakharam', 'Address': 'R/o Humnabad, Tq. Humnabad, Dist. Bidar', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Sakharam', 'Address': 'R/o Humnabad, Tq. Humnabad, Dist. Bidar', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}
Govt. of Karnataka [C.R.P.67] TITLE SHEET FOR JUDGEMENT IN SUITS IN THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC LAXMESHWAR Present: Sri. HAJIHUSENSAB YADAWAD B.Com., L.L.B., Civil Judge and JMFC, Laxmeshwar (Name of the Presid ing Judge) Dated this 30 th day of November, 2017 Suit No. O.S. 70/2011 Plaintiff: Yashwant S/o. Giriyappa Shetaraddi, Age: 50 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Magadi, Tq: Shirahatti, Dt: Gadag. (By Sri M.N.B., Advocate) -Vs.- Defendants: 1)Gram Panchayat Committee, Magadi, by its Secretary Magadi, Tq: Shirahatti, Dt: Gadag. 2)Giriyappa S/o Hanamappa Shetaraddi, Srakari Kannada Gandu Makkala Shale, Magadi, by its Head Master R/o. Magadi, Tq: Shirahatti, Dt: Gadag. 3)The State of Karnataka, By its Deputy Commissioner, Gadag. (Defendant -1 By Sri D.M.N., Advocate ) (Defendant –2 and 3 By A.G.P., )Form No.9(Civil) Title Sheet for Judgement in Suits (R.P.91) O.S.70/2011 (J) 2 Date of Institution of the suit : 25-04-2011 Nature of the suit : Permanent Injunction Date of the commencement of recording evidence : 25-11-2014 Date on which the Judgement was pronounced : 30-11-2017 Total Duration : Year/s Month/s Day/s 06 07 05 Civil Judge and JMFC, Laxmeshwar. JUDGMENT The plaintiff has filed this suit for permanent and mandatory injunction and such other reliefs. 2.Brief facts of Petitioner’s under: The plaintiff is the owner of suit property Non Agri cultural land bearing R.S. No.1/1C measuring 01 acre 25 guntas 06 annas situated at Magadi village of Shirahatti Taluka, ou t of which the eastern area of 15 guntas having boundaries: East Gavthana of the defendant West Remaining part of the land out of the same S.Number North Gadag – Shirahatti Road O.S.70/2011 (J) 3 South Gavthana of the defendant 3. The plaintiff further averred that, he produced hand sketch map along with plaint in which he shown suit pr operty by letters “ABCDE”. The remaining portions out of the same land are shown by I, II and III and portions shown by letters “M”, “N” and “O” are the encroachments made by othe rs and “P” is the statue of Mahatma Gandhiji. 4. The plaintiff further averred that, the suit pr operty belonged to one Giriyappa Shantaraddi, the father o f plaintiff. Out of 02 Acre 35 Guntas, the Giriyappa gifted an a rea of 01 are 13 guntas towards northern side in 1957 to the distr ict School Board, Dharwad (Defendant No.2) which is shown by lett er “I” and accordingly M.E. No.1095 and gifted portion was given the sub-division No.1/1A and the remaining land was give n number as 1/1B. Later on, the remaining land was also got converted into nonagricultural in the year 1970. In the surv ey resettlement the remaining area including the suit land is show to be measuring 01 acre 25 guntas and 06 annas. In this regard M.E. No.2904 was certified on 17-10-1981. Then the sub
{'Name': 'Yashwant', 'Address': 'R/o. Magadi, Tq: Shirahatti, Dt: Gadag', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Giriyappa', 'Address': 'R/o. Magadi, Tq: Shirahatti, Dt: Gadag', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Giriyappa', 'Address': 'R/o. Magadi, Tq: Shirahatti, Dt: Gadag', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
IN THE COURT OF PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C- cum MACT-IV AT HOSAPETE. PRESENT: SRI PADMA PRASAD, B.A(Law)LLB., Prl. Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Hosapete. Dated this the 13th day of August 2021. M.V.C. No.248/2017 . PETITIONER 1)Smt. Anjum Fatima W/o Late Mohammaed Arif, aged 26 years, house wife, R/o 27th ward, Chapparadahalli, Hosapete. 2)Minor Tanisha D/o Late Mohammaed Arif, aged 5 years, represented by her natural guardian mother Smt. Anjum Fatima W/o Late Mohammaed Arif, aged 26 years, house wife, R/o 27th ward, Chapparadahalli, Hosapete. 3) Mohammedayan S/o Late Mohammaed Arif, aged 1 year, represented by his natural guardian mother Smt. Anjum Fatima W/o Late Mohammaed Arif, aged 26 years, house wife, R/o 27th ward, Chapparadahalli, Hosapete. 4) Smt M.SaleemaW/o.Mehaboob sab, aged 55 years, R/o 27th ward, Chapparadahalli, Hosapete. -Vs.- RESPONDENTS: 1.Mangaleshappa S/o Basappa, aged : 29 years, Driver of KSRTC Bus bearing Registration. No. KA-37/F-559, R/o. Yelburga Depot, Yelburga Taluk, Koppala District. 2.The Divisional Controller, NEKRTC, owner of the Bus bearing Registration. No. KA-37/F-559, Koppala Division. Koppal District. MVC 248/2017 PETITION CLAIM:- Petition filed U/s 166 of M. V. Act 1989 by the claimant claiming compensation of Rs.32,50,000-00 from the opponents on account of the accident occurred on 29.05.2016 at about 11.30 pm, near Raichur Manvi road near Manvi, due to rash and negligent driving of Bus KA37 F 559 by the respondent No.1, belonging to the respondent No.2 and caused death of Mohammed Arif. Nature of Claim: Compensation Petition filed on: 25-05-2017 Claim the compensation of Rs:32,50,000-00 Date of accident: 29-05-2016. The application was filed on 25-05-2017 the M.V.C. No.248/2017 on the file of the District Judge, MACT-I.,Ballari has been made over to this Court and the same taken on the file in this court on 21-06-2017. AWARD This Case coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of SriP.Sreenivasamurty, Advocate for Petitioners and of Smt.E.Pushpalatha, Advocate for Respondent No.1&2. The same having stood over to this day for final consideration as by a considered Judgment delivered this day.2 MVC 248/2017 It is ordered and awarded that, petition filed by the petitioner Under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1989 is allowed in part. It is further ordered that, Petition against the respondent No.1 be and the same is hereby dismissed. It is further ordered and awarded that, The petitioner No.1 to 4 are entitled for total compensation of Rs. 36,80,000/- with the interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of petition till realization including the interim compensation if any awarded. It is further ordered that, Respondent No.2 is liable to pay the compensation amount awarded with interest.Respondent No.2 is hereby directed to deposit compensation amount within one month from the date of this Order. It is further ordered that, The petitioners are entitled for compensation at the ratio of 50: 20: 20: 10 out of the total compensation amount of Rs. 36,80,000/-. 50% of the share of the each petitioners shall be deposited in their names in FD for a period of 5 years in any nationalized bank or schedule bank on condition not to withdraw and encumber the deposit in any more without prior permission of this court with a direction to make a note on the deposit receipt not avail any loan or advance. Remaining balance amount shall be paid to the petitioners respectively. 3
{'Name': 'Mangaleshappa', 'Address': 'Yelburga Depot, Yelburga Taluk, Koppala District', 'Party Name': 'accused'}
IN THE COURT OF THE II ADDL. SESSIONS & SPECIAL JUDGE AT VIJAYAPURA PRESENT: Sri.G.D.Mahavarkar, M.A.,LL.B(Spl), M.L. (Lab & Indstrl Rlns & Adm. Laws), LL.M (Business Laws), M.Phil-in-Law (Juridical Science) II Addl. Sessions & Spl. Judge, Vijayapura. Dated this the 3 rd day of March 2021 Spl.Case.(SC/ST)No.47/2017 Complainant : 1)The State of Karnataka, Represented by it's Dy.S.P., Vijayapur. (By Public Prosecutor) Vs. Accused : 1)Rajesh S/o. Mohan Devagiri, No's.1 and 2 Age: 47 years, Occ: Deputy Mayor R/o. Kalyan Nagar, Vijayapur. 2)Siddu @ Sidram S/o. Karibasappa Bagalkot, Age: 44 years, R/o. Shahapeth Galli, Vijayapur. (By Sri.G.A. Atanur, Advocate) 1Date of commission of offenceOn 09.09.2017 2Date of report of offence On 09.09.2017 3Date of arrest of the accused ----- 4Date of release of accused on bailA-1 & 2 obtained the Anticipatory bail on 18.09.2018. 2 Spl.C.(SC/ST)No.47/2017 5Date of commencement of evidenceOn 29.01.2021 6Date of closing of evidenceOn 23.02.2021 7Name of the Complainant Yallappa S/o. Basalingappa Hanchinal, R/o:Gachhinakatti Colony, Vijayapura. 8Offences complained of U/Secs.448, 323, 504, 506 R/w Secs.34 of IPC & U/Sec.3(1) (r), (s) of The SC/ST (PA)Amendment Act-2015. 9Date of pronouncement of judgment On 03.03.2021 10 Opinion of the Judge Accused found not guilty. 11 Order of Sentence As per final-order. J U D G M E N T This is a charge-sheet filed by the Dy.S.P., Vijayapur leveling the charges against the above said accused Nos.1 and 2 for the commission of the offences punishable U/Secs.448, 323, 504 & 506 R/w Sec.34 of IPC & U/Secs.3(1) (r), (s) of The SC/ST (PA)Amendment Act-2015 before the II Addl. District & Sessions Court, Vijayapura in connection 3 Spl.C.(SC/ST)No.47/2017 with the Vijayapur Gandhi Chowk P.S. Cr.No.251/2017. 2.The epitomized-facts of the allegations that are leveled against the above said accused in the charge-sheet run thus: On 09.09.2017 at about 5:45 p.m. in the evening, in Shri. Sai Mobile Shop, in the ground- flour of CTS No.923/B/1A, situated on the road side of the road leading from Siddeshwar road to Ganapati Chowk in Vijayapura City, the accused No's.1 and 2 in furtherance of common intention, unlawfully trespassed-into the said Shri.Sai Mobile Shop of the CW.6 and demanded for the amount to celebrate the 'Nadadevi' festival for which, the CW.1 stated them to come after the arrival for his brother wherefore, the accused No's.1 and 2, raised the scramble with the complainant and assaulted him with their hands and caused the simple hurt and also abused him in filthy language in the name of his sub-caste, knowing fully-well that, the CW.1 belonged to the
{'Name': 'Rajesh', 'Address': "No's.1 and 2, Age: 47 years, Occ: Deputy Mayor, R/o. Kalyan Nagar, Vijayapur", 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Siddu @ Sidram', 'Address': 'Age: 44 years, R/o. Shahapeth Galli, Vijayapur', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Yallappa', 'Address': 'R/o:Gachhinakatti Colony, Vijayapura', 'Party Name': 'complainants'}
1 C.C. 624/2016 IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C., HARIHARA PRESENT : MAHADEV KANATTI, B.Com.,LL.B.(Spl) I Addl. Civil Judge & J M F C, Harihara. Dated this the 29th day of October, 2021 Criminal Case No. 624/2016 COMPLAINANT :The State represented by Sub­Inspector of Police, Harihara Town Police station ­Vs­ ACCUSED :1.Jayamma W/o Y.Siddabasappa Aged about 65 years, R/o: Hosapete Beedi, Harihara, Davanagere District. 2.Ramesh S/o Siddabasappa, Aged about 38 years R/o : Hosapete Beedi, Harihara, Davanagere District . 1.Date of commission of offence:24-05-2002 2.Date of reporting of offence :22-04-2016 3.Arrest of the accused :-- 4.Name of the informant :S.Manjula 5.Date of commencement of evidence:15­10­2018 6.Date of closing of evidence :17­08­2021 2 C.C. 624/2016 7. Offences complained U/sec :323, 504 & 506 R/w Sec.34 of IPC . 8.Opinion of Judge :As per final order 9.State represented by :Asst. Public Prosecutor 10.Accused defense by :By Sri.R.P., Advocate, : J U D G M E N T : The PSI of Harihara Town Police Station filed the charge­sheet against the accused No.1 and 2 for the offences punishable U/sec. 323, 504 & 506 R/w Sec.34 of IPC. 2.The brief facts of the prosecution story are as under: It is alleged by the prosecution that, the C.W.1 and 5 are the husband and wife, their marriage took place in the year 2012. The accused No.1 and 2 are the mother and brother of C.W.5. After the marriage C.W.1 and 5 resided with the accused only for a week. Thereafter they went to Davanagere and started to reside separately. Recently on 3.4.2016 in the night at 10.00 p.m C.W.1 and 5 came to the house of accused at Harihara demanding the share in the 3 C.C. 624/2016 house property. At that time the accused persons abused them in filthy language, assaulted them by causing simple hurt and given life threat. Thereby, accused No.1 & 2 have committed the offences punishable U/sec. 323, 504 & 506 R/w Sec.34 of IPC. 3. The CW­ 1 has set the law into motion by giving first information to Harihara Town Police Station . Pursuant to first information the C.W.11 has registered a case in Cr.No.60/2016 for the offences punishable U/sec. 323, 504 & 506 R/w Sec.34 of IPC against the accused No.1 and 2 , submitted FIR to this Court, visited the spot and conducted mahazar in the presence of the witnesses. After completion of investigation C.W.12 has filed the charge­sheet against the accused No.1 & 2 for the offences punishable U/sec. 323, 504 & 506 R/w Sec.34 of IPC . 4. After filing the charge sheet, this Court has taken cognizance of the offences punishable U/sec. 323, 504 & 506 R/w Sec.34 of IPC and registered a criminal case against the accused. Accused No.1 & 2 secured through
{'Name': 'Jayamma', 'Address': 'Hosapete Beedi, Harihara, Davanagere District', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Ramesh', 'Address': 'Hosapete Beedi, Harihara, Davanagere District', 'Party Name': 'accused'}
1 MVC No.391/2017 KABG700001062017 IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC, KHANAPUR, AT : KHANAPUR. PRESENT Sri. P . Murali Mohan Reddy, B.A.L, LL.B., Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Khanapur. M.V.C. No.391/2017 Dated this the 21 st day of January, 2022. Petitioners:- 1. Smt.Narmada w/o Maruti Patil, [Since deceased by her L.Rs.] 1A. Shri.Narayan s/o Maruti Patil, Age: 50 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o: Dodda-Hosur, T al: Khanapur. 1B. Shri.Parashram s/o Maruti Patil, Age: 45 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o: Dodda-Hosur, T al: Khanapur. 1C. Smt.Alaka Maruti Sundakar, Age: 48 years, Occ: Household, R/o: Ghadi Galli, Khanapur. 1D. Smt.Lalita Amrut Patil, Age: 42 years, Occ: Household, R/o: Dhamane, T al:Dist: Belagavi. 1E. Smt.Sital Sanjay Patil, Age: 38 years, Occ: Household, 2 MVC No.391/2017 R/o: Savarda – Goa. (By Shri.R.N.Patil, Advocate) //V/s// Respondents:- 1. Shri.Ravalu s/o Bharmanna Kadam, Age: Major, Occ: Agriculture, R/o: Chapgaon, T al: Khanapur, Dist: Belagavi. (Owner of Motorcycle bearing Reg. No.KA-22/EN-9794) 2. The Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Company Ltd., Micro Office, 340/D, Chirmurkar Galli, Khanapur. (Insurance of Motorcycle bearing Reg. No.KA-22/EN-9794) (Under Policy No.2401813115P115072290 valid from 10-03-2016 to 09-03-2017). (R-1 by Shri.I.B.Langoti, Advocate R-2 by Shri.M.V.Deshpande, Advocate) JUDGMENT This is a petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act against the Respondents seeking compensation of ₹.8,00,000/- with interest at the rate of 18% p.a., in relation to the death of one Shri.Maruti s/o Irappa Patil who is alleged to have succumbed on account of the injuries sustained in a Road Traffic Accident. 2)The case of the petitioners is as under:- On 18-05-2016, petitioner No.1’s husband by name Shri.Maruti s/o Irappa Patil was returning from his land to his 3 MVC No.391/2017 village Doddahosur by walk. He was coming on the left side of the road. At about 6-30 p.m when he came near near Yadoga cross on Khanapur - Doddahosur road, the rider of the motorcycle bearing No.KA-22/EN-9794 came from hind side in a very high speed and dashed Maruthi and caused the accident. Due to which, he sustained grievous injuries to his left hip and femur and other parts of the body. The rider of the motorcycle promised in front of gathered public by names Prakash Patil and Sanjay Patil and others that he will bear the medical and incidental expenses and went from the accident spot. 3)Maruthi was brought to his house at Doddahosur and treated there. Later, he was taken to Sanjivini hospital, Khanapur on 19-05-201, wherein first aid treatment was given and doctors have advised to take the injured to Belagavi hospital for further treatment. Thereafter, he was shifted to Vijaya hospital, Belagavi. He was admitted as an indoor patient from 19-05-2016 to 25-05-2016. He has been operated on 21-05-2016. After discharge from the said hospital he was taking treatment and thereafter he died due to the accident injuries. Petitioner No.1 has spent a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- towards medical and other incidental expenses of her husband – Maruti Patil. 4)Petitioner No.1 claimed that deceased Maruti was hale and healthy prior to the accident. He was aged 65 years at the time of accident. He was an agriculturist and he was earning Rs.15,000/- per annum. Because of accident injuries, he was permanently disabled and bed ridden till his
{'Name': 'Smt.Narmada', 'Address': 'Dodda-Hosur, T al: Khanapur', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Shri.Narayan', 'Address': 'Dodda-Hosur, T al: Khanapur', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Shri.Parashram', 'Address': 'Dodda-Hosur, T al: Khanapur', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Shri.Ravalu', 'Address': 'Chapgaon, T al: Khanapur, Dist: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Shri.Ravalu', 'Address': 'Chapgaon, T al: Khanapur, Dist: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}
1 C.C.No.238/2014 IN THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT BASAVAKALYAN PRESENT SRI.RAGHAVENDRA UPADHYE B.A., L.L.M., Civil Judge & J.M.F .C., Basavakalyan. Dated this the 2nd day of March 2021 C.C.No.238/2014 COMPLAINANT: State of karnataka Through Traffic Police station. Tq. Basavakalyan Dist Bidar. (By Asst., Public Prosecutor) //VERSUS// ACCUSED: Rajesab s/o Abdul Majeed, age: 55 years Occu: Driver, r/o Lal T alab Khadi Janda Tq. Basavakalyan (By Sri. Sri S.B.Patil Adv.) 2 C.C.No.238/2014 1. Date of commission of offences: 18.03.2013. 2. Date of report of offences : 18.03.2013. 3. Name of the complainant : Baburao Jamadar. 4. Date of recording of evidence : 11.02.2021. 5. Date of closure of evidence : 11.02.2021. 6. Offences alleged : U/s.279,337, and 304- A of IPC. 7. Opinion of Judge : The accused found not guilty. JUDGEMENT The CPI of Basavakalyan circle has filed this charge sheet against the accused for the offences punishable U/s. 279,337 and 304-A of IPC. 2.The case of the prosecution in brief is as under :- On 18.03.2013 at about 9am in front of Matemahadevi Ashram on Sustapur Bunglow road the accused being the rider of Bajaj M-80 KA-39/E-3326 drove the same in rash and negligent manner from Basavakalyan to Sastapur Banglow and dashed to the 3 C.C.No.238/2014 vehicle of informant i.e. TVS XL moped bearing No.MH- 25S-6907. In the result the pillion rider by name Baburao s/o Krishnappa Jamadar sustained injuries on right head and waist and the owner of moped Baburao s/o Givenrao Bhure suffered grievous injuries on his left leg knee and on left head and he died in Solapur hospital on 21.03.2013 while under going treatment. Thus accused has committed offences punishable under section 279,337 and 304-A of IPC. 3.After securing the presence of the accused the copy of charge sheet was furnished to him. Accusation was prepared and read-over and explained to the accused for which the accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. 4.In order to prove the case, prosecution has examined one witness as PW1 and got marked Ex.P1. Learned APP sought permission to treat PW1 as hostile and cross examined him. In his cross-examination no incriminating evidence is found against the accused.
{'Name': 'Rajesab', 'Address': 'Lal Talab Khadi Janda, Tq. Basavakalyan', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Rajesab', 'Address': 'Lal Talab Khadi Janda, Tq. Basavakalyan', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
BEFORE THE MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIM TRIBUNAL-XII, BALLARI. PRESENT; -SRI KASHIM CHURIKHAN, B.A, LL.M., MEMBER, MACT-XII, BALLARI. DATED THIS 1st DAY OF APRIL, 2021 M.V.C. NO: 1148 /2016 PETITIONER: Smt.Gangi Bai W/o Shankar Naik, aged about 38 years, R/o Talebasapuar Tahnda, H.B.halli taluk, now residing at Belagal Thanda, Ballari taluk and district. //Vs// RESPONDENTS: 1.Santhosh Naik S/o Umesh Naik, aged about 20 years, Driver of the Ape Auto bearing No. KA-36/A-4782, R/o Rayaralu thanda village, H.B.Halli taluk, Ballari district. 2.Pembri Venaktesh Naik, S/o Sonya Naik, aged about 45 years, Owenr of the Ape Auto bearing No. KA-36/A- 4782, R/o Uppal village and post, Sindhanur taluk, Raichur district. 3.The Branch Manager, M/s Shriram General Insurance Comapany Limited, Opp: Mayura Lodge, Ballari. CLAIM: The Petitioner has filed the Petition U/sec.166 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1989, Praying to award compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- with cost and interest at the rate of 24% p.a from the date of accident till the date of realization, as against the2 M.V.C. No.1148/2016 respondents, who had sustained injuries, in an accident, which took place on 11.08.2015 at about 12.30. p.m.,on H.B.Halli- Rayaralu Thanda Road, Near Rayaralu Thanda, H.B.Halli taluk, due to rash and negligent driving by the 1st Respondent driver of the Ape Auto bearing No. KA-36/A-4782, Respondent No.1 being the driver, Respondent No.2 being the owner and Respondent No.3 is the insurer of the said vehicle. Cause of action arose on : 11.08.2015 Application filed on : 20.10.2016 Court Fee paid : Rs.10/- DECREETAL ORDER: This Petition coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri.L.C.Metya Naik, Advocate for the claim petitioner, Sri.K.S.Shbhash, Advocate for Respondents No.1, Respondent No.2 is placed Ex-party and Shi.A.Mohammed Ghouse, Advocate for Respondent No.3, after perusing the material papers placed on record and upon hearing the arguments on both sides. This Tribunal doth order and award that, the petition U/Sec. 166 of M.V. Act is partly allowed with costs. It is further ordered and awarded that, the petitioner is entitled for compensation amount Rs.70,000/- (Rupees Seventy thousand eight only) along with interest at the rate of 7% p.a., from date of petition till entire amount is deposited from respondent No.2 and 3. It is further ordered and awarded that, r espondent No.3 shall deposit the compensation amount together with interest within 60 days from the date of this order in schedule bank in account of3 M.V.C. No.1148/2016 petitioner after obtaining particulars of the bank from the petitioner with right to recover the said amount with same interest till its realization from the respondent No.2 i.e., the owner of the offended vehicle by filing Execution petition. It is further ordered and decreed that, Bank authority shall release the entire compensation awarded amount in the name of petitioner. It is further ordered and decreed that, the respondent do pay to the petitioner a sum of Rs. 1501/- towards costs. Given under my hand and seal of this Court, on this 1st day of April 2021. Member, MACT-XII, Ballari. MEMORANDUM OF COSTS By the Petr. Rs.By Respt No.1 Rs.By Respt No. 2 Rs.By Respt No.3 Rs. Court Fee for Petition10-00 --- Court Fee for Vakalath01-00 01-00Ex-parte 01-00 Court Fee for Process40-00 ---- Paper Publication Charges350-00 ---- Advocate’s Fee 1000-00 -- Typing Charges 100-00 -- -- Total 1501-00 01-00 -- 01-00 Award Drafted on 09-04-2021 Award Signed on 12-04-2021 Member, MACT-XII, Ballari.
{'Name': 'Smt.Gangi Bai', 'Address': 'Talebasapuar Tahnda, H.B.halli taluk, now residing at Belagal Thanda, Ballari taluk and district', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Santhosh Naik', 'Address': 'Rayaralu thanda village, H.B.Halli taluk, Ballari district', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Santhosh Naik', 'Address': 'Rayaralu thanda village, H.B.Halli taluk, Ballari district', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Pembri Venaktesh Naik', 'Address': 'Uppal village and post, Sindhanur taluk, Raichur district', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Smt.Gangi Bai', 'Address': 'Talebasapuar Tahnda, H.B.halli taluk, now residing at Belagal Thanda, Ballari taluk and district', 'Party Name': 'complainants'}{'Name': 'Smt.Gangi Bai', 'Address': 'Talebasapuar Tahnda, H.B.halli taluk, now residing at Belagal Thanda, Ballari taluk and district', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
IN THE COURT OF THE PRL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, DHARWAD. DATED THIS THE 23rd DAY OF APRIL, 2021. PRESENT: SRI. UMESH.M.ADIGA, B.Com. LL.B. (SPL), PRL. DIST. & SESSIONS JUDGE, DHARWAD. R.A.No.253/2017 APPELLANT/S: Krishnamurthy S/o Venkatesh Kulkarni, Age: 60 Years, Occ: C.A., & Agriculture, R/o Keshavnagar, Uday Hostel circle to station road, Dharwad (By Sri.S.C.Kulkarni Advocate) V/s RESPONDENT/S: 1Smt. Sharawwa W/o Huchchappa Dwasarkeri, Age:47 years, Occ: Household, R/o: Abbigeri, Tq: Ron, now at Nrupatung Betta, Hubli. 2Shri Jakkappa S/o Dodda Mahadevappa Madar, Age: 57 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o: Salakinkopa village, Tq: Dharwad. 3Shri. Kallappa s/o Doddamahadevappa Madar, Age: 53 years, occ; Agriculture, R/o: Salakinkopa village, Tq: Dharwad. 4Shri. Sannakallappa S/o Doddamahadevappa Madar, Age: 51 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o: Salakinkopa village, Tq : Dharwad. R.A.No.253/2017 5Smt. Gadigewwa W/o Sanna Mahadevappa Madar, Age: 85 years, Occ: Household R/o: Salakinkopa village, Tq: Dharwad 6Smt. Tippawwa W/o Basappa Halagi, Age: 47 years, Occ: Household, R/o: Salakinkopa village, Tq : Dharwad. 7Shri. Kariyappa S/o Sannamahadevappa Harijan, Age: 35 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o: Salakinkopa village, Tq : Dharwad. 8Smt. Anusuya W/o Hanumantappa Harijan, Age: 57 years, Occ: Household, R/o: Salakinkopa village, Tq: Dharwad. 9Smt. Mahadevi W/o Yallappa Doddamani, Age: 53 years, Occ: Household R/o: Salakinkopa village, Tq: Dharwad. 10Smt. Nagawwa W/o Sham Hanchinamani, Age: 52 years, Occ: Household, R/o: T egur, Tq Khanapur, Dist: Belgaum. 11Shri.Sahadev S/o Sham Hanchinamani, Age: 48 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o: Salakinkopa, Tq & Dist: Dharwad. 12Shri. Basappa S/o Basappa Halagi, Age: 47 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o: Salakinkopa, Tq & Dist: Dharwad. 13Smt. Kallawwa W/o Muniyappa Madigar Age: 37 years, Occ: Household, R/o: Gandigawad, Tq: Khanapur, Dist. Belgaum. 14Smt. Parvatewwa W/o Hanumantappa Madar, Age: 87 years, Occ: Household, R/o: Salakinkoppa, Tq: Dharwad.2 R.A.No.253/2017 15Smt. Rabel @ Kechel W/o Pehlomen Guddailja, Age: 43 years, Occ: Household & Agriculture, R/o: Pawarchal, Keshwapur, Hubli. (By Sri.H.I.T arihal Adv., for R.1) (R.2 to 12 Absent) Date of filing of the appeal before this Court.23/08/2017 Nature of appeal Against the judgment and decree dated 26.11.2016 in O.S.No.47/2011 passed by the I Addl.Senior Civil Judge & CJM Dharwad Date of judgment 23-04-2021 T otal duration 03 Years 08 months JUDGMENT Defendant No.15 in OS No.47/2011 on the file of 1st Addl.Senior Civil Judge & CJM Dharwad filed this appeal challenging the decree and judgment passed in the said suit dated 26-11-2016. 2. For the sake of convenience, I refer parties as their rank before the trial court. 3. Plaintiff filed the suit for partition and separate possession of her 1/4th share in the suit properties. The said suit was decreed by decree and judgment dated 26-3
{'Name': 'Smt. Sharawwa', 'Address': 'Nrupatung Betta, Hubli', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Gadigewwa', 'Address': 'Salakinkopa village, Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Tippawwa', 'Address': 'Salakinkopa village, Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Kariyappa', 'Address': 'Salakinkopa village, Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Anusuya', 'Address': 'Salakinkopa village, Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Mahadevi', 'Address': 'Salakinkopa village, Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Nagawwa', 'Address': 'Tegur, Khanapur, Belgaum', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Sahadev', 'Address': 'Salakinkopa, Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Basappa', 'Address': 'Salakinkopa, Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Kallawwa', 'Address': 'Gandigawad, Khanapur, Belgaum', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Parvatewwa', 'Address': 'Salakinkoppa, Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Rabel', 'Address': 'Pawarchal, Keshwapur, Hubli', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Sharawwa', 'Address': 'Abbigeri, Ron, now at Nrupatung Betta, Hubli', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Gadigewwa', 'Address': 'Salakinkopa village, Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Tippawwa', 'Address': 'Salakinkopa village, Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Kariyappa', 'Address': 'Salakinkopa village, Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Anusuya', 'Address': 'Salakinkopa village, Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Mahadevi', 'Address': 'Salakinkopa village, Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Nagawwa', 'Address': 'Tegur, Khanapur, Belgaum', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Sahadev', 'Address': 'Salakinkopa, Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Basappa', 'Address': 'Salinkopa, Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Kallawwa', 'Address': 'Gandigawad, Khanapur, Belgaum', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Parvatewwa', 'Address': 'Salakinkoppa, Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Rabel', 'Address': 'Pawarchal, Keshwapur, Hubli', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Rabel', 'Address': 'Pawarchal, Keshwapur, Hubli', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE, UDUPI DISTRICT AT UDUPI Present: Sri Shivashankar B. Amarannavar, B.Com ., LL.M., Principal Sessions Judge, Udupi. Dated this the 26 th day of October, 2016 SESSIONS CASE No.52/2011 COMPLAINANT: The State: By Sub Inspector of Police, Malpe P.S. (By Public Prosecutor, Udupi.) Vs. ACCUSED: Smt. Rekha, Aged about 30 years, W/o Ravi Bangera, Residing at Kamala Nivas, Near Devu G. Bhavan, Padukere, Hejamadi village, Udupi Taluk. (By Advocate: Sri Sanjeeva A., ) 1.Date of commencement … of offence … 03-1-2011 2.Date of report of offence … 09-2-2011 3.Date of arrest of accused : Accused appeared before Co urt and granted S.C.No.52 /2011 2 Anticipatory bail on 24-6-2011. 4.Name of the complainant .. Pushparaj 5.Date of recording evidence. .. 16-07-2012 6.Date of closing of evidence. .. 01-10-2016 7.Offence complained of. .. U/s 306 of I PC. 8.Opinion of the Judge .. Acquittal ***** JUDGMENT The Sub Inspector of Police, Malpe P olice Station has filed the charge sheet against the accused for the offence punishable under Section 306 of I.P.C. The accused is on bail. 2. The brief facts of the case of the prosecu tion is that one Somayya Kanchan, who was appointed as a cl erk in the office of accused-Smt. Rekha under the name and style as “R.K. Fisheries” situated at 2 nd Floor of Karthik Complex Building near Malpe Bus Stand, Kodavoor village, Ud upi Taluk, committed suicide by hanging to a ceiling fa n with the help of Nylon rope on 3-1-2011 during night hours b etween 9 to 11p.m., and the accused abetted its commission o f suicide on the ground that the accused harassed him frequen tly and insulted him by making propaganda. In consequence of this S.C.No.52 /2011 3 incitement and abetment, by writing a death note th at the accused have behaved him in a very low order and in sulted him to commit suicide and thereby committed an offe nce punishable under section 306 of I.P.C. Therefore, t he complainant-PW1-Pushparaj has lodged a written comp laint before Malpe Police Station on 04-01-2011 as per Ex .P1, on the basis of which, a case came to be registered in Crime No.19/2011 and after completing the investigation, PW.17- Lingappa H–PSI, Malpe laid the charge sheet against the accused for the above said offence. 3. On receiving the records of the case from the Court of the learned Additional Civil Judge & JMFC, Udupi, presence of the accused was secured. After hearing the learned Public Prosecutor and the learned Advocate appearing for the accused, charge was framed agains t the accused for the offence punishable under Section 30 6 of I.P.C. and the same was read over and explained to him and he has not pleaded guilty and claimed to be tried. 4. In order to bring home the guilt of the accused, the prosecution has examined in all 17 witnesses as P.Ws.1 to 17 and got marked Exs.P1 to P17 and closed its s ide. Thereafter, the statement of accused under Section 313 of Code of Criminal Procedure was recorded. He has de nied all the incriminating materials found in the evidence o f the prosecution witnesses and he has not chosen to addu ce any oral evidence on defence side and got marked Ex.D1 during
{'Name': 'The State', 'Address': 'Malpe P.S., Udupi', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Smt. Rekha', 'Address': 'Kamala Nivas, Near Devu G. Bhavan, Padukere, Hejamadi village, Udupi Taluk', 'Party Name': 'accused'}
KABG400003492019 BEFORE THE ADDITIONAL MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL AND PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, AT CHIKODI DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2021 : P R E S E N T : SRI. T.SRIKANTH, B.A.L.,LL.B., MEMBER, ADDITIONAL M.A.C.T., & PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, CHIK ODI. MVC.NO.316/2017 BETWEEN : SRI MUKUND TUKARAM KOKANE, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O SHAMNEWADI VILLAGE, CHIKODI TALUK, BELAGAVI DISTRICT PETITIONER (BY SRI M.B.PATIL ., ADVOCATE) AND : 1. SRI BHARAT BABASAHEB KHOT, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/O SHAMNEWADI VILLAGE, CHIKODI TALUK, BELAGAVI DISTRICT. 2. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, DIVISION OFFICE, CLUB ROAD, BELAGAVI TALUK & DISTRICT. RESPONDENTS (R-1 EX -PARTE) (R-2 BY SRI S.B.HIPPARAGI ., ADVOCATE) (T.SRIKANTH) Member, Addl. M.A.C.T., & Prl. Senior Civil Judge Chikodi. MVC.No.316/2017 2 : J U D G M E N T : The petitio ner has filed this petition under Sec.166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 claiming compensation of Rs.10,00,000=00 with interest at 18% p.a., from the date of accident till realization, for the injuries sustained by him in the motor vehicle accident. 2. It is the case of petitioner that on 29/02/2016 at about 9.30 a.m., when the petitioner was proceeding on his bicycle at the left side of road, near the land of Vishwanath Fakire, within the limits of Shamnewadi Village, Chikodi Taluk, the rider of Hero Honda S plendor Plus motorcycle bearing registration No.KA -23-EC-5150, (for short „the Vehicle‟) drove the same in a rash and negligent manner , lost control over the sa me and dashed to petitioner and thereby caused the accident. The petitioner took treatment by s pending more than Rs.1,50,000=00. But, even now he is having pain and unable to do his work as he was doing earlier. He has sustained disability and loss of income. The police have filed criminal case in respect of th e accident, against the MVC.No.316/2017 3 rider of mot orcycle. The respondent -1 is the Owner and the respondent -2 is the Insurer of the vehicle . Hence, the petitioner is entitled for compensation from them. 3. After service of notice, the respondent -2 appeared before this Tribunal by engaging the services of an advocate and contested the petition by filing its statement of objections. The respondent -1 did not appear before this Tribunal, hence the petition proceeded ex-parte against him . 4. The respondent -2 filed its statement of objections denyin g the entire petition averments, age, avocation etc., of the petitioner. However, it admitted the insurance coverage, but denied the liability, as the same is subject to policy conditions. It is contended that the rider of motorcycle had no effective and valid license to ride the motorcycle. Further it is contended that the accident occurred due to the negligence of petitioner . As such respondent -2 is not liable to pay compensation. Hence, prayed to dismiss the petition.
{'Name': 'SRI MUKUND TUKARAM KOKANE', 'Address': 'R/O SHAMNEWADI VILLAGE, CHIKODI TALUK, BELAGAVI DISTRICT', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'SRI BHARAT BABASAHEB KHOT', 'Address': 'R/O SHAMNEWADI VILLAGE, CHIKODI TALUK, BELAGAVI DISTRICT', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER', 'Address': 'ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, DIVISION OFFICE, CLUB ROAD, BELAGAVI TALUK & DISTRICT', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'SRI MUKUND TUKARAM KOKANE', 'Address': 'R/O SHAMNEWADI VILLAGE, CHIKODI TALUK, BELAGAVI DISTRICT', 'Party Name': 'complainants'}{'Name': 'SRI BHARAT BABASAHEB KHOT', 'Address': 'R/O SHAMNEWADI VILLAGE, CHIKODI TALUK, BELAGAVI DISTRICT', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER', 'Address': 'ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, DIVISION OFFICE, CLUB ROAD, BELAGAVI TALUK & DISTRICT', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
KABG200011652017 IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC., AT: ATHANI Present: Shri. Abdul Rahaman Pathan , B.A. LL.M., Additional Senior Civil Judge & JMFC., R.A. No. 46/2017 Dated this 10th day of December 2021 APPELLANT/ PLAINTIFF:Shri. Suresh S/o. Bapu Kamble, Aged about 70 years, Agriculture, R/o. Ugra Khurdh, Taluka: Athani, District: Belagavi. (By Shri. V.T.B. Adv.,) //Versus// RESPONDENTS/ DEFENDANTS:1.Shri. Yashwant S/o. Shripati Kamble, Aged about 68 years, Agriculture. 2.Shri. Harishchandra S/o. Shripati Kamble, Aged about 65 years, Agriculture. 3.Shri. Rajendra S/o. Shripati Kamble, Aged about 50 years, Agriculture. 2 R.A.No.46/2017 4.Shri. Krishna S/o. Dattu Kamble, Aged about 46 years, Agriculture. 5.Shri. Tukaram S/o. Dattu Kamble, Aged about 45 years, Agriculture. 6.Shri. Babasaheb S/o. Maruti Kamble, Aged about 45 years, Agriculture. All are R/o. Ugra Khurdh, Taluka: Athani, District: Belagavi. (R1 to 6 Ex­Parte) Date and nature of Decree appealed against Judgment and decree passed in O. S. No. 484/2012 dated, 12­06­2017 on the file of III Additional Civil Judge & JMFC., Athani. Date of institution of the Appeal18­09­2017 Date on which judgment pronounced 10­12­2021 Total Duration Year/s Month/s Day/s 04 02 22 J U D G M E N T This is an appeal filed by appellant/ plaintiff against judgment and decree dated, 12­06­2017 passed by learned III Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Athani in O.S. No. 484/2012 dismissing the suit filed for a relief of perpetual injunction. 3 R.A.No.46/2017 2. The appellant was plaintiff and respondents were defendants before trial Court. For the sake of convenience, the parties to appeal are referred to in the same ranking as before the trial Court. 3. The facts of the case of plaintiff as set out in the plaint are as under: It is the case of plaintiff that, he is absolute owner of land bearing Sy. No. 11/4 measuring 04.00 acres, situated at Ugar Khurd Village, (Hereinafter referred as Suit Schedule Property). He acquired the same by virtue of final decree passed in F.D.P. No. 1/1982. Pursuant thereto, on 17­02­ 1988, the revenue authorities handed over the possession of suit property in favor of plaintiff. Based thereon, Khata of suit property has been mutated in his favor vide M.E. No. 6342 as such, plaintiff has been in possession and enjoyment of suit property. The plaintiff developed suit property by drilling bore well therein and also repaired old well situated therein. The plaintiff has been in possession of suit property by growing crops therein. This being the case, defendants though have no kind of right, title and interest highhandedly tried to interfere with his possession over suit property and also destroyed standing sugar cane crop therein. Despite repeated requests, defendants did not heed to his requests . Thus, plaintiff constrained to file instant suit for a relief of perpetual injunction to restrain defendants from interfering with his possession over suit property.
{'Name': 'Shri. Suresh S/o. Bapu Kamble', 'Address': 'Agriculture, R/o. Ugra Khurdh, Taluka: Athani, District: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Shri. Yashwant S/o. Shripati Kamble', 'Address': 'Agriculture, R/o. Ugra Khurdh, Taluka: Athani, District: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Shri. Harishchandra S/o. Shripati Kamble', 'Address': 'Agriculture, R/o. Ugra Khurdh, Taluka: Athani, District: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Shri. Rajendra S/o. Shripati Kamble', 'Address': 'Agriculture, R/o. Ugra Khurdh, Taluka: Athani, District: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Shri. Krishna S/o. Dattu Kamble', 'Address': 'Agriculture, R/o. Ugra Khurdh, Taluka: Athani, District: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Shri. Tukaram S/o. Dattu Kamble', 'Address': 'Agriculture, R/o. Ugra Khurdh, Taluka: Athani, District: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Shri. Babasaheb S/o. Maruti Kamble', 'Address': 'Agriculture, R/o. Ugra Khurdh, Taluka: Athani, District: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Shri. Yashwant S/o. Shripati Kamble', 'Address': 'Agriculture, R/o. Ugra Khurdh, Taluka: Athani, District: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Shri. Harishchandra S/o. Shripati Kamble', 'Address': 'Agriculture, R/o. Ugra Khurdh, Taluka: Athani, District: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Shri. Rajendra S/o. Shripati Kamble', 'Address': 'Agriculture, R/o. Ugra Khurdh, Taluka: Athani, District: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Shri. Krishna S/o. Dattu Kamble', 'Address': 'Agriculture, R/o. Ugra Khurdh, Taluka: Athani, District: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Shri. Tukaram S/o. Dattu Kamble', 'Address': 'Agriculture, R/o. Ugra Khurdh, Taluka: Athani, District: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Shri. Babasaheb S/o. Maruti Kamble', 'Address': 'Agriculture, R/o. Ugra Khurdh, Taluka: Athani, District: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Shri. Suresh S/o. Bapu Kamble', 'Address': 'Agriculture, R/o. Ugra Khurdh, Taluka: Athani, District: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'complainants'}{'Name': 'Shri. Yashwant S/o. Shripati Kamble', 'Address': 'Agriculture, R/o. Ugra Khurdh, Taluka: Athani, District: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'Shri. Harishchandra S/o. Shripati Kamble', 'Address': 'Agriculture, R/o. Ugra Khurdh, Taluka: Athani, District: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'Shri. Rajendra S/o. Shripati Kamble', 'Address': 'Agriculture, R/o. Ugra Khurdh, Taluka: Athani, District: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'Shri. Krishna S/o. Dattu Kamble', 'Address': 'Agriculture, R/o. Ugra Khurdh, Taluka: Athani, District: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'Shri. Tukaram S/o. Dattu Kamble', 'Address': 'Agriculture, R/o. Ugra Khurdh, Taluka: Athani, District: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'Shri. Babasaheb S/o. Maruti Kamble', 'Address': 'Agriculture, R/o. Ugra Khurdh, Taluka: Athani, District: Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
BEFORE THE MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIM TRIBUNAL-XII, BALLARI. PRESENT: -SRI KASHIM CHURIKHAN, B.A, LL.M., MEMBER, MACT-XII, BALLARI. DATED THIS 12th DAY OF APRIL, 2021 M.V.C. NO: 1065/2016 PETITIONERS: 1)Smt. Mahankalamma @ Lingamma W/o Late K.Nagappa, aged 40 years, House wife, 2)smt.K.Lakshmi D/o Late K.Nagappa, aged about 21 years, 3)Smt.Hanumanthamma D/o Late K.Nagappa, aged about 20 years, 4)K.Saroja D/o Late K.Nagappa, aged 19 years, 5)Minor K.Mahesha S/o Late K.Nagappa, aged 17 years, All are R/o D.Nagenahalli village, Ballari Taluk and District. //Vs// RESPONDENTS: 1.Mohammed Basha.T S/o Khaja Peeran.T, aged 54 years, driver of the Lorry bearing Reg. No. KA-34/A-319, R/o Indira Nagar, Kakarlathota, Ballari. 2.Prasad.M S/o M.Narasimhulu, aged 45 years, Owner of the Lorry bearing Reg. No. KA-34/A- 319, R/o D.No.18, Ramanjini Nagar, Near T.B.Sanitorium, Ballari. 3.The Branch Manager, M/s shriram General Insurance company Ltd., Ballari 4.M.Surendra @ Mr.Surendra.H,S/oH.Gadilingap pa, 20 years, Driver of the Luggage Auto bearing Reg. No. KA-34/B-2172, R/o2 M.V.C. No. 1065 / 2016 D.Nagenahalli village, Ballari taluk and district. 5.H.Gadilingappa, S/o Anjinappa, 50 years, Owner of the Luggage Auto bearing Reg. No. KA-34/B-2172, R/o D.Nagaenahalli village, Ballari Taluk and district. CLAIM: The Petitioner have filed the Petition U/sec.166 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1989, Prays to award compensation of Rs.48,00,000/- with cost and interest at the rate of 24% p.a. from the date of petition, till the date of realization, as against the respondents, causing death of one K.Nagappa S/o late K.Hanumanthappa, in an accident, which took place on 25-08- 2016 at about 6.00.a.m. Near Sivashankar Family restaurant, Moka-Ballari road, due to rash and negligent driving by the 1st respondent driver of the Lorry bearing Reg. No. KA-34/A-319, Respondent No.1 being the driver, Respondent No. 2 being the owner and Respondent No.3 being the insurer of the said vehicle, Respondent No.4 being the driver of the Luggage Auto and Respondent No.5 being the owner of the Luggage Auto. Cause of action arose on : 25-08-2016 Application filed on : 21-09-2016 Court Fee paid : Rs.10/- DECREETAL ORDER: This Petition coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence ofSri.K. Thipperudrappa, Advocate for the claim petitioners, Respondent No.1, 2, 4 and 5 are placed Exparte and Sri.Venkateshwara Prasad, Advocate for Respondents No. 3, after perusing the material papers placed on record and upon hearing the arguments on both sides.3 M.V.C. No. 1065 / 2016 This Tribunal doth order and award that, the petition U/Sec. 166 of M.V. Act is partly allowed with costs. It is further ordered and awarded that, the petitioners are entitled for compensation amount Rs.13,02,300/- (Rupees thirteen lakhs two thousand three hundred only) along with interest at the rate of 7% p.a., from respondent No.2, 3 and 5 from date of petition till entire amount is deposited. It is further ordered and awarded that, Out of the compensation awarded, the petitioner No.1 is entitled for 40%, petitioner No.2 to 5 are entitled 15% each as their share. It is further ordered and awarded that, the Respondent No.3 and 5 shall deposit the compensation amount in the ratio of 70% : 30% respectively, together with interest within 60 days before the tribunal from the date of this order in the schedule bank in account of petitioners after obtaining particulars of the bank from petitioner. It is further ordered and awarded that, Out of compensation awarded amount, Bank authority shall release 50% in favour of petitioner Nos. 1 to 4 and remaining 50% shall keep in Fixed Deposit for a period of 3 years in the name of petitioner Nos. 1 to 4.
{'Name': 'Smt. Mahankalamma @ Lingamma', 'Address': 'D.Nagenahalli village, Ballari Taluk and District', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'smt.K.Lakshmi', 'Address': 'D.Nagenahalli village, Ballari Taluk and District', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Smt.Hanumanthamma', 'Address': 'D.Nagenahalli village, Ballari Taluk and District', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'K.Saroja', 'Address': 'D.Nagenahalli village, Ballari Taluk and District', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Minor K.Mahesha', 'Address': 'D.Nagenahalli village, Ballari Taluk and District', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Mohammed Basha.T', 'Address': 'Indira Nagar, Kakarlathota, Ballari', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Prasad.M', 'Address': 'D.No.18, Ramanjini Nagar, Near T.B.Sanitorium, Ballari', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'The Branch Manager, M/s shriram General Insurance company Ltd.', 'Address': 'Ballari', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'M.Surendra @ Mr.Surendra.H', 'Address': 'D.Nagenahalli village, Ballari Taluk and district', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'H.Gadilingappa', 'Address': 'D.Nagaenahalli village, Ballari Taluk and district', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE MANGALURU, D.K. DATED THIS THE 20 TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016. PRESENT:- SRI. MALLIKARJUNA, B.Com. LL.B. 1ST ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MANGALURU. D.K. F.D.P.NO.25-09 BETWEEN:- 1. Sri. Venugopal Adappa Aged about 57 years S/o late Manjanna Adappa Residing at 7/2 Bhargavi Apartments VI Avenue, Ashoknagar Chennai - 600 083. 2. Smt. Mallika Shetty (Since deceased) rep by her LR’s (a) Harish K. Shetty Aged about 57 years H/o Smt. Mallika Shetty (b) Nikil Shetty Aged about 26 years D/o Smt. Mallika Shetty (c) Sunayna Shetty Aged about 22 years D/o Smt. Mallika Shetty No.2 (a) & 2(b) are residing at No.3 Valmic Street, Calcutta - 700 026. PETITIONERS (By Adv: Sri M.J.Jayarama Shetty ) 2 F.D.P.N o.25-09. - AND - 1. Smt. Gangarathana Rai Aged about 67 years W/o Aithappa Rai R/at Suman Apartments, 60/2 Lake Road, Near Dhakuria Bridge Calcutta- 700029 2. Raghunath Adappa Aged about 60 years S/o late Manjanna Adappa Residing at Lakshmi Nilaya Building No.1 Floor No.334/6, VI Cross K.N.Extension Yashwanatapura engaluru- 560 022. : RESPONDENTS (By Adv: Sri A.Amrith Kini for Respt.1 Sri K.R.R for Respt.2) -ORDER - This petition is filed by the petitioners under Ord er 20 Rule 18 and 12 r/w 151 of CPC. 2. The brief facts of the plaint averments and annexed affidavit are as under:- That the Court was pleased to decree the suit in O.S.No.318/1997 as per its judgment dt: 19.11.2007. 3 F.D.P.N o.25-09. Accordingly, the plaintiff No.1 and 2(a) to (c) are e ntitled to two shares out of 6 shares in the plaint ‘A’ schedule property with reference to good and bad soil and judg ment is further decreed that the account of income of prope rties may be decided in final decree proceedings. As on t oday, there is no stay of the preliminary decree since the respondents have not come forward for partition of the property in terms of preliminary decree passed by the Court. Hence, the present petition is filed. Accordingl y, prayed for dividing the properties in terms of prelimi nary decree passed by the Court by appointing Court commissioner by allowing the petition. 3. These facts have been denied by the opponents/respondents by filing his objections. The b rief facts of the same are as under: It is true that this opponent and the opponent No.2 (b) & (c) were the plaintiffs in the suit and he has filed suit in O.S.No.318/1998 against the defendant to divide the suit ‘A’ schedule property into 6 equal shares with me tes and bounds with reference to good and bad soil and a llot
{'Name': 'Sri. Venugopal Adappa', 'Address': '7/2\nBhargavi Apartments\nVI Avenue, Ashoknagar\nChennai - 600 083', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Smt. Mallika Shetty (Since deceased) rep by her LR’s', 'Address': 'No.3\nValmic Street, Calcutta - 700 026', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Harish K. Shetty', 'Address': 'No.3\nValmic Street, Calcutta - 700 026', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Nikil Shetty', 'Address': 'No.3\nValmic Street, Calcutta - 700 026', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Sunayna Shetty', 'Address': 'No.3\nValmic Street, Calcutta - 700 026', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Smt. Gangarathana Rai', 'Address': 'Suman Apartments, 60/2\nLake Road, Near Dhakuria Bridge\nCalcutta- 700029', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Raghunath Adappa', 'Address': 'Lakshmi Nilaya\nBuilding No.1\nFloor No.334/6, VI Cross\nK.N.Extension\nYashwanatapura\nengaluru- 560 022', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}
IN THE COURT OF PRL.FIRST CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC., AT MYSURU PRESENT : Smt. A.G. SHILPA, B.A., LL.B., PRL.FIRST CIVIL JUDGE & JM FC., MYSURU DATED THIS THE 20 th DAY OF JULY 2016 C.C.No. 1110/2008 Complainant Sri. Deviprasad Shetty, S/o Sham Shetty, Aged about 48 years, No.2459/6 II Cross, Vinayaka Nagar, Mysuru Taluk, (By Sri. S.D. , Adv.) V/s Accused Sri. Hasainari, S/o Yacob Saheb, Near Bilal Jamma Masjid Kodi Kodi Post, Kundapura Taluk,, Udupi District, (by Sri. D., Adv.) J U D G E M E N T The complainant has filed this complaint against th e accused under Section 200 of Cr.P.C. praying to punish the accused for the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act and if any fine amount is imposed the portion of th e fine amount may kindly be awarded as damages to the complainant.CC 1110/2008 2 2. The brief averments of the complaint are as under : It is submitted that on 01.06.2007, the accused for his family necessity borrowed a sum of Rs.95,000/- from the com plainant and agreed to repay the amount within two months and towards repayment he issued a cheque bearing No.728914 date d 10.08.2007 drawn on M/s Bhatkar Urban Co-operative B ank Ltd, Kundapura favouring the complainant for Rs.95,000/- . The complainant presented the cheque for encashment whic h was dishonoured on 02.11.2007 for the reason ‘funds ins ufficient’. The said fact was informed to the complainant on 06.11.2 007. Therefore, the complainant issued statutory notice on 08.11.2007 to accused demanding the accused to repay the due a mount. The notice was served on the accused on 10.11.2007. The accused neither replied nor repaid the amount within stipul ated time. Therefore, this complaint is filed. 3. Cognizance was taken of the offence punishable und er Section 138 of N.I. Act and sworn statement of compl ainant was recorded under Section 200 of Cr.P.C. Thereafter t he criminal case was registered. The summons got issued to the accus ed and the accused appeared before the court through his couns el. Case CC 1110/2008 3 copies furnished to the accused. Accusation of acc used was recorded. Accused pleaded not guilty and claimed t o be tried. 4. The complainant got examined himself as PW.1 and got marked the documents like Ex.P.1 to 6. 5. After completion of complainant’s side evidence, the statement of the accused under Section 313 of Cr.P. C. is recorded. Accused denied all incriminating circumstances appe aring against him and he choose to lead defence evidence and exam ined himself as DW.1 and four witness as DW.2 to 5 and got marked Ex.D.1 to Ex.D.12. 6. Heard the arguments on both sides. 7. The points that arise for my consideration are: 1. Whether the complainant proves beyond all reasonable doubt that the accused has committed an offence punishable under Section 138 of N.I. Act.? 2. What Order?
{'Name': 'Sri. Deviprasad Shetty', 'Address': 'No.2459/6, II Cross, Vinayaka Nagar, Mysuru Taluk', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Sri. Hasainari', 'Address': 'Near Bilal Jamma Masjid Kodi, Kodi Post, Kundapura Taluk, Udupi District', 'Party Name': 'accused'}
KABG510000772005 IN THE COURT OF THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC, At:GOKAK PRESENT: SHOBHA B.SC., L.L.B Addl. Civil Judge & JMFC, Gokak. Clubbed suit in O.S. No.342/2005 along with OS No.198/2006 and OS No.433/2006 Date Of Judgment: 04th day of March, 2022. Parties in OS No.342/2005 1. Smt. Gangawwa w/o Govindappa Arennavar Since deceased by her LRs 1A. Suvarna D/o Govindappa Arennavar Age: 52 years, Occ: Household R/o: Adijambavanagar, Gokak. 1B. Sri. Ramappa S/o Govindappa Arennavar Age: 45 years, Occ: Pvt. R/o: Adijambavnagar, Gokak. 1C. Sri. Shankar S/o Govindappa Arennavar Age: 42 years, Occ: Pvt. Service, R/o: Adijambavnagar, Gokak. ...Plaintiff. (By Shri. RMB, Adv.) // Vs // 1. The State of Karnataka Rptd by the Deputy Commissioner Belagavi. 2. The Insurance Officer K.G.I.D, Office, Mahantesh Nagar, Belagavi. 2 3. The Branch Mananger LIC of India, Gokak Branch Gokak. 4. The Accountant General GPF Section, Park House Bangalore. 5. The Secretary Regulated Marketing Employees Welfare Society Hubli. 6. The Deputy Director Agriculture Produce Market Committee Shivaji Nagar, Near Police Quarters Belagavi. 7. Smt. Shobha W/o Yallappa Budani Age: 22 years, Occ: Nil R/o: Gokak. 8. Smt. Saroja W/o Ranjit Kallimani Age: 19 years, Occ: Nil R/o: Gokak. 9. Kum. Savita D/o Suresh Arennavar Age: 26 years, Occ: Nil R/o: Gokak. 10. Kum. Sumitra D/o Suresh Arennavar Age: 23 years, Occ: Nil R/o: Gokak. 11. Kum Anjali D/o Suresh Arennavar Age: 20 years, Occ: Nil R/o: Gokak. (Def No.9, 10 and 11 are minors, are rptd by their M/G sister defendant No.7.) 12. The Secretary 3 Agril. Produce Market Committee Gokak. 13. Shri. Subash Suvarna Arennavar Age: years, Occ: Pvt R/o: Adijambavnagar, Gokak. .... Defendants (Defendant No1 to 5 are placed ex.parte, Shri. BKJ Adv for D7 to 11, Shri. BSK Advocate for D6, 12, D13) Date of Institution of suit : 15/09/2005 Nature of suit : Suit for Declaration and Consequential relief of injunction Date of commencement of Recording of evidence: 11/03/2008 Date of pronouncement of Judgment : 04/03/2022 Total Duration :Year Months Days 17 06 11 Parties in OS No.433/2006 1. Shri. Subhash S/o Suvarna Arennavar Age: 28 years, Occ: Private Service R/o: Gokak, Tq: Gokak. ..Plaintiff (Shri. PMH Adv) VS 1. Smt. Gangawwa W/o Govindappa Arennavar since deceased by her LR's 1(a). Smt. Suvarna Govindappa Arennavar Age: 42 years, Occ: Household R/o: Gokak. 1(b). Shankar Govindappa Arennawar Age: 42 years, Occ: Private Work R/o: Gokak. 2. Ramappa Govindappa Arennawar Age: 37 years, Occ: Private Work
{'Name': 'Smt. Gangawwa w/o Govindappa Arennavar', 'Address': 'Nan', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Suvarna D/o Govindappa Arennavar', 'Address': 'Nan', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Sri. Ramappa S/o Govindappa Arennavar', 'Address': 'Nan', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'The State of Karnataka', 'Address': 'Deputy Commissioner, Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'The Insurance Officer', 'Address': 'K.G.I.D, Office, Mahantesh Nagar, Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'The Branch Manager', 'Address': 'LIC of India, Gokak Branch, Gokak', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'The Accountant General', 'Address': 'GPF Section, Park House, Bangalore', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'The Secretary, Regulated Marketing Employees Welfare Society', 'Address': 'Hubli', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'The Deputy Director, Agriculture Produce Market Committee', 'Address': 'Shivaji Nagar, Near Police Quarters, Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Smt. Shobha w/o Yallappa Budani', 'Address': 'Gokak', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Smt. Saroja w/o Ranjit Kallimani', 'Address': 'Gokak', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Kum. Savita D/o Suresh Arennavar', 'Address': 'Gokak', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Kum. Sumitra D/o Suresh Arennavar', 'Address': 'Gokak', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Kum Anjali D/o Suresh Arennavar', 'Address': 'Gokak', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'The Secretary, Agril. Produce Market Committee', 'Address': 'Gokak', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Shri. Subash Suvarna Arennavar', 'Address': 'Adijambavanagar, Gokak', 'Party Name': 'accused'}
1 Crl.Misc.No.26083/2021 IN THE COURT OF THE XXVIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, Mayo Hall, Bangalore, [CCH.NO.29] Present :- Sri. K.M. Rajashekar, B.Sc., L.L.M., Dated this the 28th day of October 2021 Crl.Misc.No.26083/2021 Petitioner: Adam Ulla Khan @ Azam R.R, S/o Noorulla Khan, Aged about 26 years, R/at Modiroad, Edga Mohalla, D.J. Halli, Bangalore North, Arabic Coolege, Bengaluru-560 045. (By pleader : Sri. Rakshith.R) V/s Respondent: The State of Karnataka, D.J. Halli Police Station, Bengaluru. (By Public Prosecutor) ORDERS The Petitioner/Accused No.5 has approached this Court under Section 438 of Cr.P .C., for grant of anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.238/2021 of D.J.Halli Police Station, for the offences punishable under Section 399 & 402 of Indian Penal Code (I.P .C.) & Section 25(1B)(b) of Arms Act 1959 & Section 27(b) of NDPS Act 1985. 2 Crl.Misc.No.26083/2021 2. The case of the Prosecution is that, on 23.8.2021 at about 4.30 p.m., the Complainant received credible information that near Crematory Ground near N.P . Factory, about 4-5 persons armed with deadly weapons, have formed unlawful assembly with an intention to commit dacoity and were planning to attack the passersby. Thereafter, the Complainant along with his staff conducted raid at the said place and apprehended four accused persons, however one Accused person escaped from their clutches. The Investigating Officer able to seize deadly weapons like iron rod and knife from the possession of accused and thereby, Accused persons committed the aforesaid offences. 3. The Petitioner specifically contended that, he is innocent of the charges leveled against him, he has not committed any alleged offences and he has been falsely implicated in the case. There is no prima-facie case made out against the Petitioner. He was not at all involved in the alleged crime and there is no any overt act of the alleged offence. The Respondent Police had erroneously notice in filing the false case, though there are no sufficient grounds against the Petitioner. The Petitioner is not an influential person who could3 Crl.Misc.No.26083/2021 tamper with the prosecution witnesses. There are no chance of his absconding, if he is let on bail, as he is the permanent resident of given address. The Petitioner hails from respectable family. He is the only earning member of his family. Further, he is ready and willing to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by the Court. Hence, sought for bail. 4. The learned Public Prosecutor has filed objection and seriously opposed the bail application on the ground that, the petition is not maintainable either in law or on facts. Absolutely no grounds were made out for granting bail. There are sufficient materials available on record to hold prima-facie case against the accused person in respect of the alleged offences. The Petitioner absconded from the date of incident and has not co-operated for investigation of the present case and if the accused person was enlarged on bail, there are every possibility of absconding of accused, repetition of similar offences, tampering the prosecution witnesses and he may not be available for the trial. Hence, sought for dismissal of the bail applications. 5. Heard arguments of both sides and perused the records.
{'Name': 'The State of Karnataka', 'Address': 'D.J. Halli Police Station, Bengaluru', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Adam Ulla Khan @ Azam R.R', 'Address': 'Modiroad, Edga Mohalla, D.J. Halli, Bangalore North, Arabic Coolege, Bengaluru-560 045', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'The State of Karnataka', 'Address': 'D.J. Halli Police Station, Bengaluru', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'The State of Karnataka', 'Address': 'D.J. Halli Police Station, Bengaluru', 'Party Name': 'complainants'}{'Name': 'Adam Ulla Khan @ Azam R.R', 'Address': 'Modiroad, Edga Mohalla, D.J. Halli, Bangalore North, Arabic Coolege, Bengaluru-560 045', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
IN THE COURT OF THE LXXII ADDL. CITY CIVIL &SESSIONS JUDGE AT MAYO HALL BENGALURU, (CCH­73) Present: Sri.Abdul­Rahiman. A. Nandgadi, B.Com, LL.B., (Spl.,) LXXII Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru. Dated this the 09th day of April, 2021. CRIMINAL MISC.PETITION NO. 25433/2021 IN D.J.HALLY P.S.CRIME NO.199/2020. Petitioner/ Accused Persons:­1. A17: Saurabh Pasha, S/o. Sardar Pasha, Aged about 20 years, R/at No. 32, 3rd Cross, Dubai Layout, D.J.Halli Bengaluru, 2nd Cross Shivaraj road, Near Old soap factory, D.J.Halli. Bangalore ­560 45 2. A18: Imran pasha, S/o Ahmed Shariff, Aged about 31 years, R/at 02, 2nd cross, Muslim Colony, DJ Halli, Bangalore. 3. A19: Syed Ayaz, S/o Syed Khaleel, Aged about 43 years, Crl.Misc. No.25433/2021 R/at No.58, Khaleel Complex, Modi Road, DJ Halli, Bangalore. 4. A20: Sadaf Baig, S/o Late Afzal Baig, Aged about 20 years, R/at No.143, 4th Cross, Muslim Colony, Arabic College Post, Pillannna Garden, DJ Halli, Bangalore­560 045. 5. A21: Syed Nawaz, S/o Gulab Jan, Aged about 19 years, R/at 2nd cross, Sabad Nagar, Kavalbyrasandra, RT Nagar, Bangalore. 6. A22: Mohammed Siddiq, S/o Mohammed Muktiyar, Aged about 24 years, R/at 144, 1st cross, Rajappa Block, DJ Halli, Bangalore. 7. A23: Mohammed Ali Baig, S/o Ibrahim Baig, Aged about 40 years, R/at: No.7, 10th Cross, Muneshwara Nagar, Shampur Main Road, D.J.Halli, Bengaluru­560 045. 8. A24: Mohammed Umar Farooq, S/o Kaleem,2 Crl.Misc. No.25433/2021 Aged about 20 years, R/at: No­3284, 30th Cross, Nagamma Layout, Kaval Byrasandra, R.T.Nagar, Bengaluru­560 045. 9. A25­Saif Sha, S/o Akram Pasha, Aged about 29 years, R/at 1st Cross, Shampur Main Road, Near Vishwesharaya Temple, D.J.Halli, Bengaluru ­ 560 045. 10. A26­ Syed Altaf, S/o Syed Chand, Aged about 23 years, R/at 292, 2nd cross, Srinivas Nagar, DJ Halli, Bangalore. 11. A27: Abdul Riyaz, S/o Late T.V. Umar, Aged about 43 years, R/at: No.86, 7th Cross, Shampur Main Road, D.J.Halli. Bengaluru­560 045. 12. A28: Syed Afnan, S/o Late Syed Tahir, Aged about 23 years, R/at 4, C street, Old Korechepalya, Shivajinagar, Bangalore­560 051. 13. A29: Tausiff, S/o Masood Basha,3
{'Name': 'xxxx', 'Address': 'xxxx', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'xxxx', 'Address': 'xxxx', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'xxxx', 'Address': 'xxxx', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Saurabh Pasha', 'Address': 'No. 32, 3rd Cross, Dubai Layout, D.J.Halli Bengaluru, 2nd Cross Shivaraj road, Near Old soap factory, D.J.Halli, Bangalore-560 45', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Imran pasha', 'Address': '02, 2nd cross, Muslim Colony, DJ Halli, Bangalore', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Syed Ayaz', 'Address': 'No.58, Khaleel Complex, Modi Road, DJ Halli, Bangalore', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Sadaf Baig', 'Address': 'No.143, 4th Cross, Muslim Colony, Arabic College Post, Pillannna Garden, DJ Halli, Bangalore-560 045', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Syed Nawaz', 'Address': '2nd cross, Sabad Nagar, Kavalbyrasandra, RT Nagar, Bangalore', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Mohammed Siddiq', 'Address': '144, 1st cross, Rajappa Block, DJ Halli, Bangalore', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Mohammed Ali Baig', 'Address': 'No.7, 10th Cross, Muneshwara Nagar, Shampur Main Road, D.J.Halli, Bengaluru-560 045', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Mohammed Umar Farooq', 'Address': 'No-3284, 30th Cross, Nagamma Layout, Kaval Byrasandra, R.T.Nagar, Bengaluru-560 045', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Saif Sha', 'Address': '1st Cross, Shampur Main Road, Near Vishwesharaya Temple, D.J.Halli, Bengaluru- 560 045', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Syed Altaf', 'Address': '292, 2nd cross, Srinivas Nagar, DJ Halli, Bangalore', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Abdul Riyaz', 'Address': 'No.86, 7th Cross, Shampur Main Road, D.J.Halli, Bengaluru-560 045', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Syed Afnan', 'Address': '4, C street, Old Korechepalya, Shivajinagar, Bangalore-560 051', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Tausiff', 'Address': 'xxxx', 'Party Name': 'accused'}
KABG010095382017 Decree Holder counsel absent. Judgment Debtor Counsel absent. The Decree Holder counsel has remained absent and not addressed the arguments on the maintainability of the execution petition inspite of granting sufficient opp ortunity, the decree holder has failed to address the arguments on maintainability of the Execution Petition. Hence the arguments of the Decree Holder counsel is taken as nil, For orders by 3.00 P.M On perusal of the present execution petition it is filed U/s 36 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act and it is a domestic award and the said award has not been sufficiently stamped as per the provision of the Karnataka Stamp Act. In view of Judgment in M. Anasuyadevi and another V/s M.Manik Reddi and others, reported in 2003 (8) SCC 565, Division Bench of Hon’ble Supreme Court has held as under: “The question as to whether the award is required to be stamped and registered,would be relevant only when the parties would file the award for its enforcement U/s 36 of the Act. It is at this stage, the parties can raise objections regarding its admissibility on account of nonregistration U/s17 of the Registration Act, and nonstamping... The question whether an award requires stamping and registration is within the ambit of Sec.47 of the Code of Civil Procedure and not covered U/s 34.”In the present case also, the awards under execution are U/s 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The ratio in M. Anasuyadevi is a binding precedent. In view of ratio laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court in Anasuyadevi’s case referred supra, this court is having jurisdiction to decide whether the awards in the present execution petition is sufficiently stamped or not. Unless, such compliance of Article 11 of Karnataka Stamp Act is made, it cannot be said that the decree holder is empowered to enforce the award Under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Whereas, this court feels it is just and proper to reject execution petition with a liberty to decree holder to pay stamp as per the Karnataka Stamp Act and then file execution petition afresh after compliance if the same is within the limitation period. Hence the following : ORDER The execution petition is dismissed as not maintainable as the award is not executable unless,it is sufficiently stamped as per Article-11 of the Karnataka Stamp Act. The Decree Holder is at liberty to file fresh execution petition, if the same is within limitation period after compliance of the provisions of the Karnataka Stamp Act. 18-09-2021 (HEMANTH KUMAR C.R. ) VIII Addl.District and Sessions Judge, Belagavi.
{'Name': 'Decree Holder counsel', 'Address': 'Absent', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Judgment Debtor Counsel', 'Address': 'Absent', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
IN THE COURT OF THE LXXIV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE MAYOHALL UNIT, BENGALURU (CCH-75) Dated this 22nd Day of April 2022 PRESENT: SRI. MOHAMMED MUJEER ULLA C.G.B.A. LL.B., LXXIV Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru. ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 25807 /2021 PLAINTIFF: Smt. Shamasad W/o. Sri Syed Azeezulla, Aged about 67 years, R/at Flat No.G-C, Calendula Block, ‘Regency La Majada’, No.28/1, Hennur Main Road, Bengaluru-560 043. REP BY: Sreevatsava Associates. V/s DEFENDANT: Sri. Syed Shams Tabraiz, S/o. Sri. Syed Azeezulla, Aged about 38 years, R/at Flat No.101, 1st Floor, No.2, Cockburn Road, Bengaluru-560 051. REP BY: Kamaluddin Ahmad2 OS.25807/2021 Date of Institution of the suit 30.06.2021 Nature of the Suit (Suit on pro-note, suit for declaration and possession, suit for injunction, etc.)MONEY RECOVERY Date of the commencement of recording of the Evidence.02.11.2021. Date of pronouncement of Judgment 22.04.2022 Total duration Year/sMonth/sDay/s -922 JUDGMENT Mother has filed the instant suit against her estranged son for recovery of a sum of Rs. 21,82,400/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the suit till payment and cost. Facts of the case: 2. On 29.07.2017 defendant purchased a flat. For the purchase of the flat, he availed hand loan of Rs. 17,60,000/- from his mother, the plaintiff stating that he will return the same within a short period. After purchase of flat, defendant quarreled with his mother and left home on 5.08.2017. Thereafter inspite of repeated demands,3 OS.25807/2021 defendant did not repay the hand loan. Therefore, on 5.6.2021 plaintiff issued legal notice to her son the defendant calling upon him to repay hand loan of Rs. 17,60,000/-. After receipt of notice defendant gave reply dated: 21.06.2021 stating that his mother the plaintiff gave Rs.17,00,000/- to him as gift to purchase the flat. Plaintiff contends that she has not given money to the defendant as gift on the other hand she gave it as hand loan. Plaintiff contends that defendant who admitted receipt of Rs. 17,00,000/- from her and utilised the same for the purpose of purchasing apartment is liable to repay the same with interest at the rate of 6% per annum. Plaintiff contends that defendant is liable to pay hand loan of Rs.17,60,000/- and interest of Rs.4,22,400/- in total Rs.21,82,400/- with future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till payment. On these and other grounds stated in the plaint plaintiff prays to decree the suit as prayed for.
{'Name': 'Smt. Shamasad', 'Address': 'Flat No.G-C, Calendula Block, ‘Regency La Majada’, No.28/1, Hennur Main Road, Bengaluru-560 043', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Sri. Syed Shams Tabraiz', 'Address': 'Flat No.101, 1st Floor, No.2, Cockburn Road, Bengaluru-560 051', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Sri. Syed Shams Tabraiz', 'Address': 'Flat No.101, 1st Floor, No.2, Cockburn Road, Bengaluru-560 051', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
KAUK010003262017 IN THE COURT OF THE II ADDL., DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, UTTARA KANNADA, KARWAR. DATED THIS THE 20 th DAY OF SEPTEMBER -2021 R.A.No. 8/2017 PRESENT: Sri. Ganesha B. B.Sc.., L.L.M., II ADDL. District & Sessions Judge, Uttara Kannada,KARWAR. APPELLANTS:1. Smt. Shantabai W/o. Krishna Shanbhag, Age: 79 years, Ryot, R/o. Devargadde, Manki Village, Taluk: Honnavar. 2. UFM Smt. Veena W/o. Krikant Shanbhag, Age: 60 years, Ryot, 3. Smt. Vimala @ Laxmi D/o. Krishna Shanbhag, Age: 56 years, ryot, 4. Smt. Mukta @ Radha D/o. Krishna Shanbhag, Age: 58 years, ryot, 5. UFM Smt. Vinay W/o. Ganapati Shanbhag, Age: 40 years, ryot, 6. Smt. Geeta @ Padmavati D/o. Krishna Shanbhag, Age: 44 years, 7. Smt. Kalpana @ Gayatri D/o. Krishna Shanbhag, Age: 42 years, ryot, Represented by their power of attorney Shri. Ramdas S/o. Ramesh Kamath, 2 RA No. 8/2017 Age: 42 years and Keshav S/o. Ramesh Kamath, Age: 45 years, ryot, R/o. Ternamakki, Taluk: Bhatkal and also R/o. Davargadde, Manki Village, Taluk: Honnavar. (By Sri. K.T.G., Advocate) Vs. RESPONDENT : Mukund S/o. Krishna Shanbhag, Age: 60 years, ryot, R/o.Devargadde, Manki Village, Taluk: Honnavar (by Sri. M.L.N., Adv.,) Date of Institution of the Appeal 07.03.2017 Date and nature of the decree or order appealed against Judgment and decree passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Honnavar in OS No. 7/2013 dated 17.11.2014 and set aside the finding recorded in FDP 2/2015 dated 7.2.2015. Date on which the Judgment was pronounced 20.09.2021 Duration of the Appeal Year/s Month/s Day/s - 04 - - 06 - - 13 - J U D G M E N T This is an appeal filed by the appellants who are the opponents in FDP and plaintiffs in OS No. 7/2013 in the trial court under section 96 r/w Order 41 Rule 1 of C.P.C., praying to set aside the finding recorded in FDP 2/2015 dated 7.2.2015 and 3 RA No. 8/2017 to restore the judgment and decree passed in OS 7/2013 by the Senior Civil Judge, Honnavar. 2.The appellants before this court are the respondents and the respondent is the petitioner in the Final Decree Proceedings and for the sake of convenience, the parties in this order have been referred as per their rank before the trial court. 3.The brief facts of the petitioner’s case is as follows: That the petitioner who is the defendant in OS No. 7/2013 wherein, after contest the suit was decreed for partition and separate possession to an extent of 1/9th share and in pursuance of the same this final decree proceedings filed and during the pendency of the same, the I.A.No.III filed by the petitioner to alter the shares of the parties in pursuance of the decision rendered by Hon’ble Supreme Court of India i.e., 2015 (4) KCCR 3265 (SC) (Prakash and others V/s. Pulawati and others). 4.The brief facts of the case of the respondents as follows: The respondents have filed their objection to this application and contended that the husband of the respondent No.1 and father of other respondents and the petitioner by name Krishna Srinivasa Shanbhag was a permanent tenant and he was
{'Name': 'Smt. Shantabai W/o. Krishna Shanbhag', 'Address': 'R/o. Devargadde, Manki Village, Taluk: Honnavar', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Smt. Veena W/o. Krikant Shanbhag', 'Address': 'Nan', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Smt. Vimala @ Laxmi D/o. Krishna Shanbhag', 'Address': 'Nan', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Smt. Mukta @ Radha D/o. Krishna Shanbhag', 'Address': 'Nan', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Smt. Vinay W/o. Ganapati Shanbhag', 'Address': 'Nan', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Smt. Geeta @ Padmavati D/o. Krishna Shanbhag', 'Address': 'Nan', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Smt. Kalpana @ Gayatri D/o. Krishna Shanbhag', 'Address': 'Nan', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Mukund S/o. Krishna Shanbhag', 'Address': 'R/o.Devargadde, Manki Village, Taluk: Honnavar', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}
1 Crl.Misc.No.25745/2021, Crl.Misc.No.25757/2021 & Crl.Misc.No.25781/2021 IN THE COURT OF THE XXVIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, Mayo Hall, Bangalore, [CCH.NO.29] Present :- Sri. K.M. Rajashekar, B.Sc., L.L.M., Dated this the 13th day of July 2021 Crl.Misc.No.25745/2021, Crl.Misc.No.25757/2021 & Crl.Misc.No.25781/2021 Crl.Misc.No.25745/2021 Petitioners: 1.Stanly @ Stalin Mathew.A, S/o Anthony, Aged about 27 years, R/at No.36, Near Fire Land, Egipura Main Road, II Stage, Egipura, Bangalore. Accused No.2 2.Prabhu @ Kervin Prabhu, S/o Chrisisthu Raj, Aged about 27 years, Flat No.15, No.01, Church Road, Chavra Church, Egipura, Vivek Nagar, Bangalore. Accused No.3 3.Arunachalam, S/o Raj Kumar, Aged about 25 years, R/o No.04, Ambedkar Colony, Egipura, Vivek Nagar, Bangalore. Accused No.62 Crl.Misc.No.25745/2021, Crl.Misc.No.25757/2021 & Crl.Misc.No.25781/2021 4.Raju @ Raja.E, S/o Saroj, Aged about 36 years, R/at No.22, Ambedkar Colony, Egipura, Vivek Nagar, Bangalore. Accused No.7 (By pleader : Sri. A.T. Narayanappa) Crl.Misc.No.25757/2021 Petitioners: 1.Kutty @ Johnson Regun.C, Ageda bout 34 years, S/o Christraj, R/o at No.229, 10th Cross, Near Ayappa T emple, Audugodi, Viveknagar Post, Bangalore. Accused No.1 2.Prabhu @ Kervin Prabhu, Aged about 27 years, S/o Christraj, R/o at No.Flat No.13, No.01, Church Road, Chawra Church, Ejipura, Viveknagar, Bangalore. Accused No.3 (Petition against A.3 not pressed) (By pleader : Sri. Prasanna Rao) 3 Crl.Misc.No.25745/2021, Crl.Misc.No.25757/2021 & Crl.Misc.No.25781/2021 Crl.Misc.No.25781/2021 Petitioner: Padma @ Padmanabhan, S/o Vijay Kumar, Aged about 27 years, R/at No.19/4, 19th Cross, Ejipura, Viveknagar Post, Bangalore. Accused No.5 (By pleader : Sri. A.T. Narayanappa) V/s Respondent: The State of Karnataka, Vivek Nagar Police Station, Bengaluru. (By Public Prosecutor) COMMON ORDERS The Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 3, 5 to 7 have approached this Court under Section 439 of Cr.P .C., for grant of regular bail in Cr.No.106/2021 of Vivek Nagar Police Station for the offence punishable under Section 307 r/w Section 149 of Indian Penal Code (I.P .C.).
{'Name': 'Stanly @ Stalin Mathew.A', 'Address': 'No.36, Near Fire Land, Egipura Main Road, II Stage, Egipura, Bangalore', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Prabhu @ Kervin Prabhu', 'Address': 'Flat No.15, No.01, Church Road, Chavra Church, Egipura, Vivek Nagar, Bangalore', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Arunachalam', 'Address': 'No.04, Ambedkar Colony, Egipura, Vivek Nagar, Bangalore', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Raju @ Raja.E', 'Address': 'No.22, Ambedkar Colony, Egipura, Vivek Nagar, Bangalore', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'The State of Karnataka', 'Address': 'Vivek Nagar Police Station, Bengaluru', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'Kutty @ Johnson Regun.C', 'Address': 'No.229, 10th Cross, Near Ayappa Temple, Audugodi, Viveknagar Post, Bangalore', 'Party Name': 'complainants'}{'Name': 'Prabhu @ Kervin Prabhu', 'Address': 'Flat No.13, No.01, Church Road, Chawra Church, Ejipura, Viveknagar, Bangalore', 'Party Name': 'complainants'}{'Name': 'Padma @ Padmanabhan', 'Address': 'No.19/4, 19th Cross, Ejipura, Viveknagar Post, Bangalore', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
IN THE COURT OF THE PRL.CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC, AT, MALUR PRESENT:- SMT.PARVATHAMMA B., B.A., LL.M. Prl. Civil Judge & JMFC, Malur Dated this the 12 th day of March 2021 O.S. NO.28/2017 Plaintiff/s : Narayanappa S/o.late.Krishnappa, Aged about 78 years, R/o.Minasundra Village, Lakkur Hobli, Malur Taluk. (Rep. by Sri.D.N.S. Advocate) -V/s- Defendant/s : 1. Bolamma D/o.late.Krishnappa, Aged about 70 years, R/o.Nagondahalli Village, Lakkur Hobli, Malur Taluk. 2. Munivenkatamma D/o.late.Krishnappa, Aged about 67 years, R/o.Nagondahalli Village, Lakkur Hobli, Malur Taluk. 3. Ramakka D/o.late.Krishnappa, Aged about 65 years, R/o.Minasundra Village, Lakkur Hobli, Malur Taluk. 4. Muniyamma D/o.late.Krishnappa, Aged about 95 years, R/o.Indiranagar, Railway Station, Malur Town. 2 O.S. No.28/2017 5. Muniyamma W/o.late.Krishnappa, Aged about 81 years, 6. Rathnamma D/o.late.Krishnappa, W/o.Chikkamuniyappa, Aged about 50 years, 7. Venkatamma D/o.late.Krishnappa, Aged about 45 years, D.4 to 7 are R/o. Minasundra Village, Lakkur Hobli, Malur Taluk. 8. Venkatamma D/o.late.Krishnappa, Aged about 75 years, R/o. Harinigatta Village, Lakkur Hobli, Malur Taluk. (Rep. by Sri.B.M.V Adv for D.2 and D.3, Sri.N.P. Adv. for D.6 and D.8, D.5 dead and D.1 Exparte) ORDERS ON I.A.VI U/O.VII RULE 10 R/W SEC.151 OF CPC & PRELIMINARY ISSUE This issue pertains to pecuniary jurisdictio n of this court. It is tried as preliminary issue. 2. The counsel for defendant No.2 and 3 has filed m emo along with copy of gazette notification and valuati on of the suit schedule property situated at Nagondahalli Vil lage, Lakkur Hobli, Malur Taluk. 3 O.S. No.28/2017 3. Heard the counsel for the defendants an d plaintiffs on Issue No.1 and memo. At the time of arguments t he counsel for the plaintiff Sri.D.N.S submits he has no objection to I.A and the said IA may be allowed and return th e plaint to present it before the appropriate court. 4. On the basis of the rival pleadings of the parties, this court framed the following issue on the pecuniary jurisdiction:- ISSUES 1. Whether the defendant No.2 and 3 proves that this court has no jurisdiction to try the suit? or 1. Whether the defendant No.2 and 3 have made out grounds to allow the said application? 5. Perused the documents placed by the parties and perused the pleadings of the parties. Having consi dered the material on record, my answer to the above Issue No .1 and point No.1 are answered in the Affirmative for the following: R E A S O N S 6. Issue No.1 & Point No.1 :- The suit is filed by the plaintiff seeking for the relief of partition and s eparate possession over the suit schedule property against the defendants claiming half share. 7. The plaint schedule properties are lan ded properties bearing survey No.169/2 measuring 1.16 acres, surve y
{'Name': 'Narayanappa', 'Address': 'Minasundra Village, Lakkur Hobli, Malur Taluk', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Bolamma', 'Address': 'Nagondahalli Village, Lakkur Hobli, Malur Taluk', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Munivenkatamma', 'Address': 'Nagondahalli Village, Lakkur Hobli, Malur Taluk', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Ramakka', 'Address': 'Minasundra Village, Lakkur Hobli, Malur Taluk', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Muniyamma', 'Address': 'Indiranagar, Railway Station, Malur Town', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Muniyamma', 'Address': 'Nan', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Rathnamma', 'Address': 'Nan', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Venkatamma', 'Address': 'Nan', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Venkatamma', 'Address': 'Harinigatta Village, Lakkur Hobli, Malur Taluk', 'Party Name': 'accused'}
Case is taken up today before E- Lok adalath. Plaintiff , defendant no. 1 and 2 are present through V.C. Both sides counsels are present. Counsel on both sides filed joint memo reporting settlement. Affidavit of plaintiffs no. 1 to 3 and defendants no. 1 and 2 along with their photographs and copy of adhar cards are also produced. The contents of the joint memo is admitted by the parties by way of affixing the signatures on the compromise petition. The counsel for the plaintiff and defendant no. 1 and 2 are duly engaged counsels who are authorized to conduct the case on behalf of the plaintiff and defendants including the power to enter into compromise. Further as per the orders and observation in WP 7338/2020 the courts may also permit compromise even in the absence of parties. In this case joint memo is signed by the parties and they are represented by the Advocates. Further, Advocates have produced affidavits of the parties in support of joint memo Parties have accepted the terms of the joint memo as per the joint memo the plaintiffs have received Rs.8,00,000/- from defendant no. 1 and 3 and relinquished their right in the suit properties. Both the counsels are duly engaged counsels who are authorized to conduct the case on behalf of the parties including the power to enter into compromise. In view of joint memo suit is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd Sd Non Judicial Conciliator Judicial Conciliator
{'Name': 'xxxx', 'Address': 'xxxx', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'xxxx', 'Address': 'xxxx', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'xxxx', 'Address': 'xxxx', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'xxxx', 'Address': 'xxxx', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'xxxx', 'Address': 'xxxx', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'xxxx', 'Address': 'xxxx', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'xxxx', 'Address': 'xxxx', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'xxxx', 'Address': 'xxxx', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'xxxx', 'Address': 'xxxx', 'Party Name': 'complainants'}{'Name': 'xxxx', 'Address': 'xxxx', 'Party Name': 'complainants'}{'Name': 'xxxx', 'Address': 'xxxx', 'Party Name': 'complainants'}
IN THE COURT OF II ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT : BALLARI Present : Smt. M.D. Pavithra B.A., LLB. II-Addl.Senior Civil Judge, Ballari. ORIGINAL SUIT NO.89/2017 Dated this the 30th day of June, 2022 Plaintiff : Smt. Kokila B @ Keerthy Patil W/o. Sri. Patil Raghu Veera Reddy, D/o. Sri. Uthanur Veera Reddy B. 25 years, Housewife, R/o. Seerpi Village and Post, Belaguppa Mandalam, Ananthapuram District, A.P. Pin Code 515 741. (By Sri. P. H. Manjunath, Advocate). Vs. Defendants : 1.Sri. Uthanur Veera Reddy B. S/o. late Sri. Mallanna, 65 years, Agriculturist, R/o. B. Belagallu Village, Ballari Taluk & District, Pin Code 583 115. 2.Smt. B. Parvathamma W/o. Sri. Uthanur Veera Reddy B. 60 years, Housewife, R/o. B. Belagallu Village, Ballari Taluk & District, Pin Code 583 115. 2 O.S.No.89/2017 3.Smt. B. Eramma W/o. Sri. Purushothama Reddy, D/o. Sri. Uthanur Veera Reddy B. 45 years, Housewife, R/o. Kampata Baburam Village, Kambadahal Post, Nandvaram Mandal, Kurnool District, A.P. Pin Code 518 360. 4.Smt. B. Rudramma W/o. Sri. Venkatesh Gouda, D/o. Sri. Uthanur Veera Reddy B. 38 years, Housewife, R/o. T. Bhudihall Village, P.D. Halli Post, Ballari Taluk & District. Pin Code 583 111. 5.Sri. B. Gave Gouda S/o. Sri. Uthanur Veera Reddy B. 35 years, Agriculturist, R/o. B. Belagallu Village, Ballari Taluk & District, Pin Code 583 115. 6.Sri. B. Rohit Kumar S/o. Sri. Uthanur Veera Reddy B. 29 years, R/o. B. Belagallu Village, Ballari Taluk & District, Pin Code 583 115. 7.Sri. Y. Basappa S/o. Jambanna, 50 years, Agriculturist, R/o. B. Belagallu Village, Ballari Taluk & District, Pin Code 583 115. (By Sri. J. Thippe Swamy. Advocate for D.1 to 6). (D.7 Exparte) 3 O.S.No.89/2017 Date of Institution of the suit : 28.03.2017 Nature of the suit : Partition Date of commencement of recording evidence : 22.07.2019 Date of Pronouncing Judgment : 30.06.2022 Duration of the suit : Days Months Years 02 03 05 J U D G M E N T This suit is for partition and separate possession of the plaintiff’s 1/5th share in th suit schedule properties by metes and bounds. 2. Background facts in a nutshell are as follows : In the plaint it is averred that the plaintiff and defendant No.3 to 6 are the daughters and the sons of defendant No.1 & 2. Apart from that the plaintiff and defendant No.3 to 6, defendant No.1 & 2 also had sons
{'Name': 'Smt. Kokila B @ Keerthy Patil', 'Address': 'W/o. Sri. Patil Raghu Veera Reddy, D/o. Sri. Uthanur Veera Reddy B. 25 years, Housewife, R/o. Seerpi Village and Post, Belaguppa Mandalam, Ananthapuram District, A.P. Pin Code 515 741', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}
1 LAC No. 360/17 IN THE COURT OF I ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, BELAGAVI DATED: This the 15th day of February, 2021 PRESENT SRI. BASAVARAJ B.Com., LL.M. I ADDL. DIST. & SESSIONS JUDGE, BELAGAVI LAC No. 360/2017 BETWEEN 1. Mahadevappa Fakirappa Murgod (Deceased by his LRs) 1A. Fakirappa S/o Mahadevappa Murgod, Age: 65, (Deceased by his LRs) As per the Order dated 18.3.2019 1A(1) Chandrawwa W/o Fakirappa Muragod, Age: 65, Household, R/o Mallur Village, Tq: Saudatti, Dist: Belagavi 1A(2) Irawwa W/o Basavant Itagi, Age: 48, Household, R/o Mallur Village, Tq: Saudatti, Dist: Belagavi 1A(3) Rudrappa S/o Fakirappa Muragod, Age: 32, Agri., R/o Mallur Village, Tq: Saudatti, Dist: Belagavi 1B. Kubendra S/o Mahadevappa Muragod, Age: 48, Agri R/o Mallur Village, Tq: Saudatti, Dist: Belagavi 1C. Shivaputrappa S/o Mahadevappa Muragod, Age: 55, Agri., R/o Mallur Village, Tq: Saudatti, Dist: Belagavi For self and P.A. Holder of 1A(1) to 1 A(3) and 1B. …Claimant/s2 LAC No. 360/17 (By Sri P V Sambargi, Adv.) AND 1. The Spl. Land Acquisition Officer, Malaprabha Project ­III Sector No. 60, Navanagar, Bagalkot 2. The Executive Engr., KNNL, Navilutirth, No.2, Dam Site, Tq: Saundatti, Dist Belagavi 3. The CAO, KNNL, Halyal Road, Dharwad, Tq., Dist: Dharwad …Respondent/s (R­1 By DGP, R­2 & R­3 by Sri S N Goudar, Adv.) J U D G M E N T This petition has arisen out of reference made by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Malaprabha Project­III, Bagalkot (hereinafter referred as 'SLAO') u/s 64 of The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred as 'RFCTLARR Act, 2013') for adjudication of the claim made by the claimants for enhancement of compensation amount in respect of their acquired land situated at Mallur Village, Saundatti Tq., Belagavi District for the purpose of submergence of the lands in the back water of3 LAC No. 360/17 Malaprabha Left Bank Reservoir Project by publishing in the Karnataka Gazette on 6.8.2015 on passing of his award in LAQ/SR­20/10­11 (Addl.) dated 17.1.2017. 2.The particulars of acquired land of the claimants is as under: Sy No.Village Measurement A ­ G 114Mallur 0 ­ 16 3.The particulars of the assessment and determination of market value by the SLAO with respect to the lands of Mallur Village is as under: Type of land Amount (Per Acre) Method adopted by the SLAO Dry Not determined as Dry Land is not acquired Wet Land 1,83,000/­ SR Guideline Values 4.The background leading to the reference is that admittedly, the SLAO acquired the land belonging to the claimants. Being aggrieved by the award passed by the SLAO, the claimants made protest petition u/s 64 of the RFCTLARR Act, 2013 for making reference to the court stating that the compensation awarded for the acquired land
{'Name': 'Mahadevappa Fakirappa Murgod', 'Address': 'Not available', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'The Spl. Land Acquisition Officer', 'Address': 'Malaprabha Project \xadIII, Sector No. 60, Navanagar, Bagalkot', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'The Executive Engr.', 'Address': 'KNNL, Navilutirth, No.2, Dam Site, Tq: Saundatti, Dist Belagavi', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'The CAO', 'Address': 'KNNL, Halyal Road, Dharwad, Tq., Dist: Dharwad', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}
KAHS020019382014 Presented on : 09-09-2014 Registered on : 09-09-2014 Decided on : 09 -02-2022. Duration : 7 years, 5 months, 0 days IN THE COURT OF II ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT Hassan,HASSAN Presided Over by LOKESHA L.A.C./404/2014 Petitioner: SUBBARAJU S/o Nagaraju. Age: 54 years. Address: Kommanahally village, Dudda Hobli, Hassan taluk and District, VERSUS Respondents:- 1.SPL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER Address: Government of karnataka 2.ASSISTANT COMMISSNER. HASSAN. 3.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD, Hasan.L.A.C.No.404/2014 4.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, K.R.D.C.L H.N.PURA ROAD HASSAN. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Advocate for Petitioner: G.RANGASWAMY . Advocate for R-1 to R-3 : D.G.P. Advocate for R-4: P.S. MOHAN. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT This case has been arisen out of the reference made by the respondent No.1 under Section 18(1) of Land Acquisition Act 1894 for adjudicating the correct market value of the acquired lands belonging to the claimant. After contest by the 1st respondent, this Court was allowed the petition in part by determining the market value of lands per gunta at Rs.1,00,000/­ as per order dated 01­09­2015. The said order was challenged by the respondents 1 to 4 herein before the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in M.F.A Nos.5457/2019 (LAC). As per the order dated 16­01­2021, the said petition was allowed by Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka and matter remanded to decide the claim of the petitioner afresh, after affording an opportunity to the claimant as well as to the respondents to adduce evidence and thereafter to decide the market value of land in question afresh in accordance with law 2L.A.C.No.404/2014 on the basis of material produced before this Court, within a period of 6 months from the date of receipt of copy of the order. Another 6 months has been extended by Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka in all connected cases vide order dated 29­10­2021 passed in M.F.A.No.6390/2019. 2. The State of Karnataka has acquired the following lands belonging to the claimant situated at Kommanahalli village, Dudda Hobli, Hassan Taluk for the purpose of Hassan Town Outer ring road, Hassan Town ring road under Preliminary and Final notification published in the Karnataka Gazette and the details are as hereunder:­ LAC No.Sy.No & ExtentDate of 4(1) notifi­ cation Date of 6(1) notifi­ cationDate of Award Date of 12(2) noticeDate of 18(1) appli­ cation 404/14 123; 9 guntas: 124; 11 guntas;15.10.08 8­10­09 6­7­12 6­10­2012 3.It is stated in the petition that land bearing Sy.No.123 measuring 9 guntas, Sy.No.124 measuring 11 guntas situated at Kommanahalli village, Dudda Hobli, Hassan Taluk, belonging to the petitioner Subbaraju has been acquired by the 1st respondent for the purpose of Hassan Town ring road. The 3
{'Name': 'SPL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER', 'Address': 'Government of Karnataka', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'ASSISTANT COMMISSNER', 'Address': 'Hassan', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'EXECUTIVE ENGINEER', 'Address': 'PWD, Hasan.L.A.C.No.404/2014', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}{'Name': 'EXECUTIVE ENGINEER', 'Address': 'K.R.D.C.L H.N.PURA ROAD HASSAN', 'Party Name': 'respondents'}
IN THE COURT OF THE III ADDL.CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY (CCH No.25). Dated: This the 22 nd day of December, 2021. Present: Smt. ISHRATH JAHAN ARA , B.A.L., LL.B., III Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru. ORIGINAL SUIT No. 714 / 2015 Plaintiff Sri P.Krishnamurthy, S/o late H.Puttappa Reddy, Aged about 61 years, R/at No.700, 2nd main road, 3rd cross, Domlur Layout, Domlur, Bengaluru-560 071 By Sri G.R.Prakash, Advocate. vs. Defendants 1. Smt. R.Padma, W/o late S.Thyagaraju, Aged about 49 years, R/at No. 487, Jagadeesha Nagar, New Thippasandra post, Bengaluru-560 075. 2. Mr. Debo Jyoti Choudhari, S/o tapan Kumar Choudhari, Aged about 43 years, R/at No.285, 1st main, Jagadeesha Nagar, New Thippasandra Post, Bengaluru-560 075. By Sri. K.M.Janardhan Reddy for D.1, Advocate D.2- Exparte 2 O.S.No.714/ 2015 Date of Institution 20.01.2015 Nature of Suit For Declaration and Injunction Date of commencement of Evidence 12.01.2021 Date of pronouncement of Judgment 22.12. 2021 Total Duration: Years Months Days 06 11 02 J U D G M E N T The Plaintiff has filed this Suit against the defendants for for declaration, declaring that he is a absolute owner of the suit schedule property and for delivery of vacant possession of the suit schedule property from the hands of the defendants and for other reliefs. The suit schedule property is:- All that piece and parcel of the Residential Property bearing BBMP Katha No.608/728/454, situated at Garakamanthana Palya measuring (as on date) 40 x 30 feet situated in Ward No.81, Vignananagara, Bangalore and bounded on the; East by : Road West by : Site No.95 North by : Site No.63 South by : Site No.75. 3 O.S.No.714/ 2015 2). The brief facts of the case is as under:- One Sri.S.Krishnappa, s/o late Sonnappa conveyed the site bearing No.74, with HASP Katha No.454, situated at Garakamanthana Palya, K.R.Puram Hobli, Bangalore in favour of plaintiff under the sale deed dated. 16.11.1984 and from that date, the plaintiff is holding and enjoying the same as his absolute property and name of the plaintiff has been registered as Khatedar with then Municipal Council, K.R.Puram during 2005 and he has paid the assessment to the concerned authority. Later on when the said property comes within the jurisdiction of BBMP, the Katha was registered in the name of plaintiff with Khatha No.608/728/454 and plaintiff has paid the assessment up to date to BBMP. 2(a).The plaintiff further averred that, all of a sudden the 1st defendant started interfering with the suit schedule property in the guise of a collusive sale deed dated. 10.01.2003 with the 2nd defendant and another sale deed which is in the form of re-conveyance dated. 15.04.2004. When the 1st defendant started to interfere with the suit schedule property, the plaintiff preferred a suit in O.S.No.10243/2005 before the 22nd Addl.City Civil Judge, Bengaluru for permanent injunction and said Court has dismissed the suit solely relying on electricity bill produced by the 1st defendant and Regular First Appeal in RFA
{'Name': 'Sri P.Krishnamurthy', 'Address': 'No.700, 2nd main road, 3rd cross, Domlur Layout, Domlur, Bengaluru-560 071', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Smt. R.Padma', 'Address': 'No. 487, Jagadeesha Nagar, New Thippasandra post, Bengaluru-560 075', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'Mr. Debo Jyoti Choudhari', 'Address': 'No.285, 1st main, Jagadeesha Nagar, New Thippasandra Post, Bengaluru-560 075', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
FORM No.(9) TITLE SHEET FOR JUDGMENT (R.P.91) (CIVIL) IN SUIT IN THE COURT OF ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT UDUPI Present: Sri. Manjunatha M.S., B.A.,LL.B., Addl. Civil Judge & JMFC,UDUPI. O. S. No. 241/2012 Dated this the 14th day of December, 2020. PLAINTIFF : 1. Smt. Parvathi Shedthi (Since deceased), Aged 63 years, D/o. Rukmini Shedthi, 1(a). Dhanapal Shetty, Aged 75 yrs., 1(b). Manmohan Shetty, Aged 47 yrs., 1(c). Vijayakumar Shetty, Aged 46 yrs., 1(d). Chethan Kumar Shetty, Aged 43 yrs., 1(e). Harjeevan Shetty, Aged 40 yrs., 1(f). Jyothi Kumar, Aged 38 yrs., All are residing at “Shivabhag”, D. No.2-80, Kumargodu village, D. No.2-80, Kumargodu village, P.O. Brahmavara, Udupi taluk. 2 OS NO. 241/2012 2. Bhoja Hegde, Aged about 79 years, S/o. Subbanna Hegde, 3. Shubhavathi Hegde, Aged about 54yrs., D/o. Late Ananda Hegde, 4. Prakashchandra Hegde, Aged about 52 yrs., S/o. Late Ananda Hegde, 5. Harish Hegde, Aged about 44 yrs., S/o. Late Ananda Hegde, Nos.2 to 5 are residing at “Shivabhag House”, D. No.3-379, Kumragodu village, Post Brahmavara, Udupi taluk. (Rep. by Sri. P.N.G.K.R., Advocate) // Versus // DEFENDANTS : 1. Smt. Susheela Shedthi, Aged about 70 yrs., D/o. Kaveri Shedthi, 2. Rathnavathi Rai, Aged about 78 yrs., W/o. Late Ramanna Rai, 3 OS NO. 241/2012 3. Ranjith Shetty, Aged about 42 yrs., S/o. Susheela Shedthi, 4. Dr. Deviprasad Rai, Aged about 46 yrs., S/o. Rathnavathi Shedthi, All are residing behind Shivabhag House, Kumragodu village, Post Brahmavara, Udupi taluk. ( Rep. By Sri. H.R.S., Advocate ) Date of institution - 16-06-2012 Nature of the suit - Suit for perpetual Injunction Date of commencement of Evidence - 10-01-2014 Date of judgment - 14-12-2020 Duration - Year/s Month/s Day/s 08 05 28 (Manjunatha M.S.) Addl. Civil Judge & J.M.F.C., UDUPI
{'Name': 'Smt. Parvathi Shedthi', 'Address': '"Shivabhag", D. No.2-80, Kumargodu village, P.O. Brahmavara, Udupi taluk', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Dhanapal Shetty', 'Address': '"Shivabhag", D. No.2-80, Kumargodu village, P.O. Brahmavara, Udupi taluk', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}
AWARD IN M.V.C. CASE. Date of Filing. 03-04-2017 Date of Disposal. 19-07-2022 IN THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & M.A.C.T-XIV HARAPANAHALLI. M.V.C. NO. 262/2019 PETITIONERS :Rangappa S/o Hanumanthappa aged about 45 years Occ:Coolie at present Occ:Nil R/o Ramaghatta Village Hatrapanahalli tq Davangere dist. V/ s RESPONDENT/S :1. Sri Prabhu@ Allamaprabhu S/o Narappa@ Banakara Narappa aged about 35 years Driver of Tractor-Trailer bearing Reg.No.KA-17/TB-817 & KA- 17/TB-818, R/o Ramaghatta Village Harapanahalli tq. 2. Sri.Narappa @ Banakara Narappa S/o Sanna Shivappa aged about 60 years Owner of Tractor- Trailer bearing Reg.No.KA-17/TB-817 & KA-17/TB- 818, R/o Ramaghatta Village Harapanahalli tq. 3. The Manger Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Limited, No. 41, 2nd Floor, Cirstu Comlex, Lavelle Road Shanthala Nagar, Ashok Nagar, Bangalore 560001. (Policy No.1- 3W2RPCG/P400/94270845 VALID FROM 01.10.2015 to 30.09.2016 CLAIM. The petition U/Sec. 166 of M.V Act filed by the petitioners and prays for an order to award compensation of Rs. 20,00,000/- with court costs and interest at the rate of 12 % p.a., from the date of accident till the date of realization on account of Injury of Rangappa S/o Hanumanthappa owingM.V.C.262/2017 to the accident took place in In the land of Narappa at Ramaghatta Village Harapanahalli tq at about 06-00 PM on 02/01/2016 due to the rash and negligent driving of Tractor-Trailer bearing Reg.No.KA-17/TB-817 & KA- 17/TB-818 driven by its driver i.e., Respondent.No1 The petition is coming on this day for final disposal before Smt. M Bharathi. B.Com., LLB,, Senior Civil Judge & M.A.C.T - XIV Harapanahalli, in the presence of Sri. A K Rajappa advocate for petitioner, Sri. K M Ravishankar advocate for Respondent 1 and 2 Sri. Syed Yunas advocate for Respondent 3. By Judgment, It is ordered and awarded that , the Petition filed by the petitioners U/s 166 of MV Act 1989 is Partly allowed. It is further ordered and awarded that ,The petitioner is entitled for compensation of Rs,1,40,000/- (Rupees One lakh and forty thousand only) with interest at 9% per annum from the date of petition till payment of entire amount. It is further ordered and awarded that, The respondent 2 is liable to pay the above said compensation with interest to the petitioner. The respondent 2 being the owner of the vehicle shall deposit the above said compensation amount within 30 days from the date of this award. It is further ordered and awarded that, This petition is dismissed against the respondents No.1 and 3. t is further ordered and awarded that, as the compensation amount is meager, hence there is no order as to deposit. It is further ordered and awarded that, the advocate fee is fixed at Rs.1000/- Given under my hand and seal of this court this the 3rd day of August - 2022. Senior Civil Judge & M.A.C.T-XIV Harapanahalli Draft Award Notified on 04-08-2022. Award Signed on.10-08-2022.2M.V.C.262/2017 MEMORANDUM OF COST Petitioners Respondents 1)Court fee paid on petition 10=00 - 2)Court fee paid on process 15=00 - 3)Advocate fee. (F.C. filed) 1000=00 - Total 1025=00 - Senior Civil judge & M.A.C.T-XIV., Harapanahalli.3
{'Name': 'Rangappa', 'Address': 'Ramaghatta Village Hatrapanahalli tq Davangere dist.', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Sri Prabhu@ Allamaprabhu', 'Address': 'Ramaghatta Village Harapanahalli tq.', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}{'Name': 'Sri.Narappa @ Banakara Narappa', 'Address': 'Ramaghatta Village Harapanahalli tq.', 'Party Name': 'defendant'}
BEFORE THE MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIM TRIBUNAL-XII, BALL ARI. JUDGE CONCILIATOR-1, SRI KASHIM CHURIKHAN, B.A, LL.M., MEMBER, MACT-XII, BALLARI. ADVOCATE CONCILIATOR-2, SMT.GHOUSIA, DATED THIS 19 th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2020 M.V.C. NO: 554 /2016 PETITIONER: Mareppa S/o Hanumanthappa, aged about 29 years, Ex-Lorry, Hamali, R/o Pothnal village, Manvi Taluk, Raichur District, presently residing at Siddartha Nagar, Contanment, Ballari. //Vs// RESPONDENTS: 1. Zakir S/o Khasim Sab, aged about 40 years, Driver of the Lorry bearing Reg.No.Ap-21/V-1357, R/o Sindhanur now R/o care of Shekhanna, Sindhigi compound, Raghavendra Talkies Road, Ballari. 2. Mukthiyar Ahamed S/o Nazeer Ahammed, aged about 45 years, Owner of the Lorry bearing Reg.No. Ap-21/V- 1357, R/o Care of P.Chand Basha S/o P. Buden Sab, Flower street, Bangalore road, Ballari 3. M/S National Insurance Company Limited, by its Divisional Manager, Main road, Parvathi Nagar Ballari. CLAIM: The petitioner has filed the Petition U/s.166 of t he Motor Vehicles Act, 1989 Prays to award compensatio n of Rs.6,25,000/- with costs and interest from the date of the accident till the date of realization against the respondents for causing injuries of the petitioner Mareppa , in an accident, which took place on 09-06-2008 at about 11.00 a.m. near Rama sagra Gate, on M.V.C. No.554/2016 2 S.H.19 road, due to rash and negligent driving by the 1 st respondent driver of the Lorry bearing Reg.No.Ap-21/V-1357 ,, Respondent No.1 being the driver, Respondent No.2 being the owner a nd respondent No.3 insurer of the said vehicle. Cause of action arose on : 09-06-200 8 Application was filed on : 17-06-2016 Court fee paid : Rs.10/- COMPROMISE DECREE:- Both parties have filed joint memo before Mega E- Lok-Adlath for final settlement in the presence of Sri.M.Mohmmed, Advocate for the claim petitioner, Respondent No.1 and 2 are dismissed, Sri.T.Jeevan Babu, advocate for Respondent No.3, perused the joint memo filed by t he petitioner and respondent No.3 and the same is read over and ex plained to the both parties. Both parties are admitted and accepte d terms of the joint memo, it is ordered that, the claim of th e petitioner is allowed as prayed for in joint memo by granti ng a decree awarding compensation of Rs.55,000/-(Rupees ten lakhs only) . It is further ordered and awarded that, the petition is allowed. The Respondent No.3 shall deposit agreed amount of Rs. 55,000/- within 60 days from the date of this order to the account of the petitioner after obtaining bank details of the peti tioner. If fails the award amount shall carry the interest at the rate o f 9% p.a. It is further ordered and awarded that, bank author ity shall directed to release entire award amount to the peti tioner. M.V.C. No.554/2016 3 It is further ordered and awarded that, the petitio ner is not entitled for any cost. It is further ordered and awarded that, the joint Memo is part and parcel of the award. Given under our hand and seal of this Court, on 19 th day of December 2020. JUDGE, Conciliator, Advocate Conciliator. Compromise award drafted on: 28.12.2020 Compromise award signed on: 29.12.2020 JUDGE, Conciliator, Advocate Conciliator.
{'Name': 'Mareppa', 'Address': 'Pothnal village, Manvi Taluk, Raichur District, presently residing at Siddartha Nagar, Contanment, Ballari', 'Party Name': 'plaintiff'}{'Name': 'Zakir', 'Address': 'Sindhanur now R/o care of Shekhanna, Sindhigi compound, Raghavendra Talkies Road, Ballari', 'Party Name': 'accused'}{'Name': 'Mukthiyar Ahamed', 'Address': 'Care of P.Chand Basha S/o P. Buden Sab, Flower street, Bangalore road, Ballari', 'Party Name': 'accused'}