Text Generation
Transformers
PyTorch
llama
Eval Results
Inference Endpoints
text-generation-inference
starling-7B / README.md
soujanyaporia's picture
Adding Evaluation Results (#1)
cd5873c verified
metadata
license: apache-2.0
datasets:
  - anon8231489123/ShareGPT_Vicuna_unfiltered
  - declare-lab/HarmfulQA
model-index:
  - name: starling-7B
    results:
      - task:
          type: text-generation
          name: Text Generation
        dataset:
          name: AI2 Reasoning Challenge (25-Shot)
          type: ai2_arc
          config: ARC-Challenge
          split: test
          args:
            num_few_shot: 25
        metrics:
          - type: acc_norm
            value: 51.02
            name: normalized accuracy
        source:
          url: >-
            https://huggingface.co/spaces/HuggingFaceH4/open_llm_leaderboard?query=declare-lab/starling-7B
          name: Open LLM Leaderboard
      - task:
          type: text-generation
          name: Text Generation
        dataset:
          name: HellaSwag (10-Shot)
          type: hellaswag
          split: validation
          args:
            num_few_shot: 10
        metrics:
          - type: acc_norm
            value: 76.77
            name: normalized accuracy
        source:
          url: >-
            https://huggingface.co/spaces/HuggingFaceH4/open_llm_leaderboard?query=declare-lab/starling-7B
          name: Open LLM Leaderboard
      - task:
          type: text-generation
          name: Text Generation
        dataset:
          name: MMLU (5-Shot)
          type: cais/mmlu
          config: all
          split: test
          args:
            num_few_shot: 5
        metrics:
          - type: acc
            value: 47.75
            name: accuracy
        source:
          url: >-
            https://huggingface.co/spaces/HuggingFaceH4/open_llm_leaderboard?query=declare-lab/starling-7B
          name: Open LLM Leaderboard
      - task:
          type: text-generation
          name: Text Generation
        dataset:
          name: TruthfulQA (0-shot)
          type: truthful_qa
          config: multiple_choice
          split: validation
          args:
            num_few_shot: 0
        metrics:
          - type: mc2
            value: 48.18
        source:
          url: >-
            https://huggingface.co/spaces/HuggingFaceH4/open_llm_leaderboard?query=declare-lab/starling-7B
          name: Open LLM Leaderboard
      - task:
          type: text-generation
          name: Text Generation
        dataset:
          name: Winogrande (5-shot)
          type: winogrande
          config: winogrande_xl
          split: validation
          args:
            num_few_shot: 5
        metrics:
          - type: acc
            value: 70.56
            name: accuracy
        source:
          url: >-
            https://huggingface.co/spaces/HuggingFaceH4/open_llm_leaderboard?query=declare-lab/starling-7B
          name: Open LLM Leaderboard
      - task:
          type: text-generation
          name: Text Generation
        dataset:
          name: GSM8k (5-shot)
          type: gsm8k
          config: main
          split: test
          args:
            num_few_shot: 5
        metrics:
          - type: acc
            value: 10.08
            name: accuracy
        source:
          url: >-
            https://huggingface.co/spaces/HuggingFaceH4/open_llm_leaderboard?query=declare-lab/starling-7B
          name: Open LLM Leaderboard

Paper | Github | Dataset| Model

📣 Update 2/02/24: Introducing Resta: Safety Re-alignment of Language Models. Paper Github Dataset

As a part of our research efforts to make LLMs safer, we created Starling. It is obtained by fine-tuning Vicuna-7B on HarmfulQA, a ChatGPT-distilled dataset that we collected using the Chain of Utterances (CoU) prompt. More details are in our paper Red-Teaming Large Language Models using Chain of Utterances for Safety-Alignment

Image

Experimental results on several safety benchmark datasets indicate that Starling is a safer model compared to the baseline model, Vicuna.

Image

Experimental Results

Compared to Vicuna, Avg. 5.2% reduction in Attack Success Rate (ASR) on DangerousQA and HarmfulQA using three different prompts.**

Compared to Vicuna, Avg. 3-7% improvement in HHH score measured on BBH-HHH benchmark.**

Image

TruthfulQA (MC2): 48.90 vs Vicuna's 47.00

MMLU (5-shot): 46.69 vs Vicuna's 47.18

BBH (3-shot): 33.47 vs Vicuna's 33.05

Jailbreak Prompt for harmfulness eval using Red Eval as reported in the paper

This jailbreak prompt (termed as Chain of Utterances (CoU) prompt in the paper) shows a 65% Attack Success Rate (ASR) on GPT-4 and 72% on ChatGPT.

Image

HarmfulQA Data Collection

We also release our HarmfulQA dataset with 1,960 harmful questions (converting 10 topics-10 subtopics) for red-teaming as well as conversations based on them used in model safety alignment, more details here. The following figure describes the data collection process.

Image

Note: This model is referred to as Starling (Blue) in the paper. We shall soon release Starling (Blue-Red) which was trained on harmful data using an objective function that helps the model learn from the red (harmful) response data.

Citation

@misc{bhardwaj2023redteaming,
      title={Red-Teaming Large Language Models using Chain of Utterances for Safety-Alignment}, 
      author={Rishabh Bhardwaj and Soujanya Poria},
      year={2023},
      eprint={2308.09662},
      archivePrefix={arXiv},
      primaryClass={cs.CL}
}

Open LLM Leaderboard Evaluation Results

Detailed results can be found here

Metric Value
Avg. 50.73
AI2 Reasoning Challenge (25-Shot) 51.02
HellaSwag (10-Shot) 76.77
MMLU (5-Shot) 47.75
TruthfulQA (0-shot) 48.18
Winogrande (5-shot) 70.56
GSM8k (5-shot) 10.08