both the Hawking radiation and the entropy of the fermion zero modes. For high enough energies, or inevitably near singularities in the texture, the fundamental nonrelativistic description takes over. Thus superfluid $^3$He is a promising model for experimental and theoretical simulations of quantum effects related to the event horizon, and may offer useful ideas about resolving the physics near a singularity.

 Acknowledgements.
==================

This collaboration was carried out under the EU Human Capital and Mobility Programme (contract CHGE-CT94-0069). The work of TJ was also supported in part by NSF grant PHY94-13253, the Institute for Theoretical Physics at the University of Utrecht, the General Research Board of the University of Maryland, and the Erwin Schrödinger Institute. The work of GV was also supported in part by the Russian Foundation for Fundamentalus to a castle looming high above a hill, with a tumultuous 750-year history of having been burnt down time and again by Turkish and Austrian invaders and rebuilt several times. Warmly welcomed with a shot of peach pálinka, a traditional Hungarian brandy, we were taken to a large indoor arena for an enactment of gallantry and weaponry skills by horsemen clad in medieval costumes. The show was rounded off with a meaty, medieval dinner, sans cutlery, in keeping with the theme. Next morning, Robert halted briefly at Szépkilátó (szép=nice, kilátó=view) which affords one of the most beautiful panoramas of unspoilt Balaton. The serene vista echoed with silence of times long gone.

The 440 m high mountain of Badascony (Bada-choi) rose abruptly across the lake, now but a mute


reminder of a volcanic mountain. Home to rare flora and fauna, Badascony is famous for viniculture dating back to Roman times. The full-bodied character and taste of its wine is unique owing to its strategic location near the warm lake and basalt mountain’s soil. Next was Szigliget (Tseegli-get) Fortress in Veszprem County atop Castle Hill, an island until 200 years ago. Built in 1260 by Benedictine monks, the border fortress changed hands dozens of times in a turbulent 750-year history, never once succumbing to Turkish invaders. Here, too, a gripping show in medieval garb was on for schoolchildren.

We climbed the steep pathway, past cannons, bastions, crumbling stone walls and chapel to the very top. The oldest ruins, now called King Tower, commemorate King Bela IV, fondly regarded as---
address:
- '[**P.E.**]{}: Department of Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA'
- '[**X.M.**]{}: Department of Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA'
author:
- Pavel Etingof
- Xiaoguang Ma
title: Lecture notes on Cherednik algebras
---

Introduction
============

Double affine Hecke algebras, also called Cherednik algebras, were introduced by Cherednik in 1993 as a tool in his proof of Macdonald’s conjectures about orthogonal polynomials for root systems. Since then, it has been realized that Cherednik algebras are of great independent interest; they appeared in many different mathematical contexts and found numerous applications.

The present notes are based on a course on Cherednik algebras given by the first author at MIT in the Fall of 2009. Their goal is to give an introduction to Cherednik algebras, and to review the web of connections between them


their proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law on
February 2, 2015. The trial court then entered its decree, dated December
11, 2014, on April 27, 2015, terminating the parental rights of Mother and
Father to Child. Father is not a party to this appeal, nor has he filed a
separate appeal from the termination of his parental rights.
J-S58016-15

were born in July 2008 and October 2010, respectively.2 Mother moved to

Union County in January 2014.        On March 18, 2014, Lycoming County

Children and Youth Services notified Union County Children and Youth

Services (hereinafter “CYS”) that Mother relocated to Union County,

Pennsylvania.   On April 1, 2014, CYS filed a dependency petition and sought

to remove Child from Mother’s home.

      On May 27, 2014,The Flare Magazine September 2013 Editorial Stars Actress Amber Heard

American actress Amber Heard covers the upcoming Flare Magazine September 2013 issue. Promoting her soon to hit theatres movie 'Paranoia,' a film about an entry-level employee at a powerful corporation, she channels her inner sexy sophisticate for the photoshoot. She is clad in a pale wardrobe of neutrals and whites.

Styled by Erin Walsh, the blonde beauty wears an elegant shirt from The Row and skirt from A.L.C. in the Flare Magazine September 2013 editorial. The looks were shot in studio by photographer Kurt Iswarienko. In the accompanying article, she talks about her movie choices, "If there was an interesting rom-com script, I wouldn’t be against it, but the stuff I have gotten is just girls who are dying to


of 10 feet, he noticed that the shopping bag which defendant held contained clothing garments attached to hangers. It appeared that price tags were affixed to the garments and the garments were hanging over the side of the shopping bag. After watching defendant for a short time, Patterson walked over and stood next to defendant, and looked into the shopping bag. Patterson again observed numerous garments on coat hangers. Each garment had a "full" price tag attached to it. Patterson explained that a "full" price tag is one which is divided into three consecutive parts. The price tags attached to the clothing indicated that the clothing came from Carson, Pirie, Scott and Company (Carson).
Patterson further testified that he had purchased clothing from Carson's store on numerous occasions. Eacharticle of clothing which he purchased had a "full" price tag attached to it. In Patterson's experience, the salesperson always detached the first part of the three-part price tag and then removed the clothing from the hanger prior to wrapping the clothing and completing the sale.
Patterson further asserted that after observing the clothing in defendant's shopping bag, he identified himself to defendant as a police officer and asked defendant "where he had gotten the clothing." Defendant shrugged his shoulders. Patterson then took the shopping bag from defendant, opened it up, and saw that each piece of clothing was on a hanger and had a "full" price tag attached. Patterson identified this clothing at trial as the clothing he had recovered from defendant's possession and which had been in


accurate drive to the left side of the fairway. A large tree and bunker guard each side of the green, although the generous sand trap won’t present many problems for Ryder Cup players.

4th: Châteaufort

New fairway bunkers mean players will need to produce a long and straight tee shot to set up the uphill approach to an elevated green, which is full of slopes. A long par four and one of the toughest holes on the course.

5th: Plein Gaz

There is potential for welcome respite on this short par four. Three fairway bunkers guard the corner of a short right dogleg and more lies sand in front of a green which narrows at the back but this presents a chance to be aggressive.

6th: Maïs ou Colza

One of several holes withouta bunker, the short sixth is a good birdie opportunity with the biggest difficulty coming in judging the distance of the approach to a green below the level of the fairway. Expect players to use an iron from the tee, followed by a wedge.

7th: Le Dromadaire

A dogleg right which features a tee shot played to a blind, elevated section of a two-part fairway, followed by a tricky approach to the long green which starts narrow but widens dramatically. Out of bounds awaits a wild drive to the right.

8th: Le Green Keeper

A solitary, albeit deep, bunker guards the front of the large green on this par three, where judging the wind is a common difficulty, as is keeping the ball on a seriously sloping green from a tee shot


a par five. Hitting the fairway from the tee is vital.

18th: La Foule

An exciting closing hole, with water all the way down the left – and in front of the green – plus pot bunkers on the right of the fairway. Used to be a par five before regrading. Strategy from the tee is imperative, if only to ease the sense of fear around the approach shot.Lucas moved to another area to work and

then travelled to the United States.

      The asylum officer determined that Lucas was credible, but that he did not

have a reasonable fear of persecution or torture if returned to Guatemala.

Specifically, the asylum officer found that Lucas failed to establish that the harm

he experienced or feared was on account of a protected ground or that the harm

would be inflicted with the consent or acquiescence of a Guatemalan public

official. Lucas requested review of the reasonable fear determination by an IJ.

      On February 23, 2015, before the reasonable fear proceeding had concluded,

Lucas filed this petition for review of the DHS’s decision to reinstate his 2012

expedited removal order. On March 11, 2015, while this appeal


A video of Hamas terror chief Ahmed Jabari praying for revenge to be taken on Jews and Americans has surfaced online.

The video, posted to Ynet, was filmed only days before he was killed in an Israeli airstrike. Taken during a secret visit to Mecca, he is also seen in the short clip praying and asking for apostates to be punished. “Allah, bring victory to those who support this religion and inflict defeat on those who have abandoned this religion,” he says. Jabari was visiting Mecca as part of the Muslim pilgrimage custom known as Hajj.

Jabari was assassinated on November 14 in the Gaza Strip, after several days of rocket fire paralyzed southern Israel. Immediately following the assassination, the IDF struck terror targets in the Strip as part ofto meet me for lunch" "At the restaurant where i work." "But she never came." "I tried to tell the cops that she was in danger," "That -- that someone from the ballet had been following her." "Wait, you're saying eva had a stalker?" "Did she say who it was?" "Oh, no." "She -- she didn't say." "She -- she said she could handle it herself." "By the looks of things, she did." "Eva was carrying a can" "Of pepper spray in her gym bag." "It appears to be half empty." "Perhaps she had a recent run-in with her stalker." "Is this eva's car?" "Yes." "Was she driving it the day she went missing?" "Yes." "Henry, where are you going with this?" "The carpet in cars nowadays" "Is


Film Criticism in Egypt: Blossoming out of Challenge

By Rowan El Shimi

Talent Press 2017 participant Rowan El Shimi

Egypt has a long standing cinema industry. It is one of the oldest in the world and is the oldest in the Arab region and Africa. While Egyptian cinema flourished in local and regional production and distribution from the turn of the nineteenth century until the 1950s, it was largely monopolised by the state for nationalist purposes to establish Egypt’s new modernist socialist state in the 1950s and 1960s. The decades that followed saw a wave of realist cinema capturing stories from the margins of society. Since then the industry has largely fallen victim to several economic crises affecting both the quality and quantity of films produced – that’s not to saythere weren’t several shining productions in the past decades.

There is a long history of film critics observing and commenting on Egyptian films and the industry’s development. An official university programme that trains critics in Cairo, as well as established publications that offer space for their writing has paved the way for several generations of critics, who have their own association. However, film criticism circles are not bound by these academic credentials. Workshops and field learning account for most of the education young critics in Egyptian cities are exposed to.

Currently, the industry is largely shaped by comedies and crowd-pleasers. However, there are several significant contributions from filmmakers and producers in both the commercial and independent realm. While most do not enjoy commercial success at home, they receive wide critical


acclaim and hefty festival runs abroad. Yet ongoing issues with both film censorship and restrictive legal conditions on production has made making films a challenge for artists within the commercial and independent industry in Egypt.

These restrictions tend to make film critics serve not only as commentators on the art form, but advocators of a certain plight of freedom of expression – both for themselves and the filmmakers they engage with. Social media has also played a role in creating more channels for film criticism beyond the traditional newspapers, whether through online media, film centred blogs, youtube channels or simply Facebook posts. These platforms have supported the creation of a whole wave of young critics eager to reach the public and are slowly establishing themselves within the industry.

This isMike Katz

Born November 14, 1944
New Haven, Connecticut

Whenever talk of the sport’s best chest is debated, Mike Katz is a name that quickly enters the discussion. In addition to his mighty pecs, he is also remembered for one of the most famous scenes in Pumping Iron, when Ken Waller steals his T-shirt.

Katz is one of the many iron warriors who were influenced by Steve Reeves. Watching the movie Hercules, young Katz was so inspired by the physique of 1947 Mr. America Reeves that he decided muscles should be part of his own future. Katz also found inspiration in Bill Pearl and later in Harold Helland, who became his training partner at Helland’s garage gym.

Katz’s first bodybuilding competition was a 1959 teen YMCA event in Waterbury, Connecticut, and, like fellow


2007 inductee Boyer Coe, Katz spent many summer weekends competing in regional contests. The results of these events were not reported in the magazines of the time and are, therefore, lost. At the age of 18, he place 10th in the Mr. Nutmeg State and, in 1964, he was declared Mr. Teen Connecticut.

After an All-American college football career, Katz went on to play in the NFL for the New York Jets, but a knee operation in 1968 ended his career and prevented him from being a part of the Jets’ winning Super Bowl team in that final year.

Joining the IFBB in 1969, Katz placed second in the tall class at the Mr. American in New York City, and then won that title the following year. In September 1972,he won the IFBB Mr. World, as well as best back, best chest and most muscular at the White Plans County Center. In his first Mr. Olympia in 1976, Katz placed second in the heavyweight class. He then took a few years off from competing – during which tim he made guest-posing appearances – before wrapping up his competitive career with a 15th-place finish at the 1981 Mr. O.

After his bodybuilding career ended, Katz kept busy – he was the first person of fame or notoriety to work with Eunice Kennedy Shriver when she began Special Olympics projects in New Haven, and his World Gym East was the first franchise organized after Joe Gold began offering them. The gym name changed to Planet Fitness in 2004. Katz, who


has bachelors and master’s degrees in health and physical education, and a pre-doctorate in administration and supervision, retired in 1999 from Hamden High School, where he had been teaching for 33 years.

He stays in touch with his bodybuilding roots by judging contests, and he has judged the Olympia several times. He still trains four or five times per week and runs his gym.

Hall of Fame Inductees for 2007

IFBB PROFESSIONAL LEAGUE®, IFBB PRO LEAGUE®,
IFBB PRO® and the IFBB Professional League logo are registered trademarks owned by the IFBB Professional League.
The IFBB Professional League logo cannot be altered in any way, shape or form without the expressed written approval of the IFBB Professional League. Where such approval is granted, the IFBB Professional League will provide the altered logo.abusing her physically and emotionally, allegedly holding her at gunpoint on a nightly basis.

Brown was tried and convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to serve a prison term of 51 years to life. Since being incarcerated, Brown has gone on to graduate from high school and college while repeatedly fighting for her release.

She was granted a clemency hearing earlier this year before the six-member Tennessee Board of Parole, citing a recent Supreme Court Decision that banned life sentences for juveniles. The board eventually denied her request for clemency after a split vote. On Dec. 6, the Tennessee Supreme Court ruled that Brown must serve 51 years before she is eligible for parole.

If he so chooses, Haslam can use his powers of executive clemency to pardon Brown, which is


CHAPTER 37: BETWEEN THE HERMITAGE AND THE HOSPITAL OF ST. MARY, ROUNCEVAL (SITES OF NOS. 1 TO 15, WHITEHALL)

The frontage between the hermitage and the Hospital of St. Mary,
Rounceval, seems to have been first built upon about the year 1400. A
document of Westminster Abbey (fn. n1) giving the rents received by the Chapel
of St. Mary in 1392–4 mentions the receipt of 12d. in respect of a certain
vacant place lying between "Rouncevale" and the hermitage. In the
account for 1405–6 (fn. n2) is an item concerning ten shops at "Charryng"
belonging to the sacristan, which appear in the account for 1411–2 (fn. n3) as ten
shops near "Rouncyvall" demised to the sacristan, and in a statement of
receipts for the years following 1413 (fn. n4) the ten shops are specified as "inter
Rouncyvall etheremitagium." On 31st August, 1487, the Abbot of
Westminster leased (fn. n5) to John "Hareys" nine tenements situated together
near "Charyngcrosse" with gardens adjoining, abutting on "le Rouncevall"
on the north, on the garden of "le Rouncevall" on the east, on the ground
called "Scotlond" on the south, and on the royal way leading from
"Rouncevall" to Westminster on the west. No dimensions are given, but
these are supplied in a lease of the same property to John Henbury on 19th
December, 1519, (fn. n6) in which the premises are said to contain in length
along the street to the chapel or hermitage of St. Katherine 167 feet 3
inches, and in width from the street eastward next the chapel 143 feet,
extended westward "triangulariter" near the estate ("fundum") of St.
Mary of "Rouncevall" and next the estate opposite


called "le Scotlond,"
203 feet. The length of 167 feet from the centre of the entrance into
Craig's Court, representing the original northern boundary of Hornebolte's
house, on the hermitage property (see p. 226), takes us to the northern
boundary of No. 1, Whitehall, which from other considerations can be
shown to be the southern limit of the Rounceval property on the street frontage.

On 18th May, 1531, Henry VIII, who had acquired the freehold
from Westminster Abbey, purchased (fn. n7) Henbury's interest, and at once
proceeded to pull down and rebuild the houses. (fn. n8)

Site of the former No. 20, Charing Cross. On 14th March, 1547–8,
Edward VI granted (fn. n9) to William Delahey a 21 years' lease of a messuage
then in the latter's tenure. The Ministers' Accounts show that the premises
had formerly been on leaseto John Wylton and John Ibleton. Subsequently
Robert Gardiner, "sergant of her mats seller," obtained a reversionary grant
for 21 years. (fn. n10) No record of a grant in perpetuity has been found, but his
grandson Richard was distinctly under the impression that Robert was
"lawefullye seised in his Demeane as of fee" in the messuage, when on
26th May, 1565, he granted a 25 years' lease of it to Thomas Putterell,
then in occupation. The property was described as "ioyninge on a Tenement then in the Tenure of one Peter Nicholson on the south parte, and the
Tenement … of William Horsley on the north parte, and adioyninge upon
a Tenement … of John Rede on the east parte, and the street Leadinge
betwene Charinge Crosse and Westm' palac on the west parte." The
property descended to


Robert Gardiner's son, Richard, on whose death in
1594 it came to the latter's son, Richard. In 1609–10 Sir John Parker, who
had a lease of the adjoining house, formerly of Horsley, "not beinge Contented wth soe much as was in the tenure of the sayd William Horsley,"
had encroached on what Gardiner considered his freehold, and, moreover,
put forward a claim on behalf of the King to the whole of Gardiner's premises.
The result was the suit (fn. n11) in which Gardiner, David Hughes and Edmond
Newsham, (fn. n12) the two latter being Gardiner's tenants, were the defendants,
and which has given us the valuable plan of this and the adjoining property
in 1610 (Plate 110).

A few words on this plan are called for. The signature at the bottom
is illegible save for the word "Robt.,"but from the depositions in the suit it
appears that the author was Robert Tresswell. It shows the whole of the
premises between "Scotland" and Rounceval. The two centre houses
marked "Sir John Parker "and "Mr Gardyner," and shown in ground plan,
are described with some exactness, but the plan was probably not intended to
show the rest of the houses with meticulous accuracy, and while giving a true
general impression cannot be relied upon in details. None of the measurements
(except of the two centre houses) agrees with the facts save that of 143 feet
from the street to the north-east corner of "The Armitage." The latter is
represented with an eastern boundary roughly parallel to the line of the
street, but this is very wide of the mark, for its south-east corner was really
about 220 feet


from the street, and the appearance of the plot is therefore
misleading. Moreover, the wall of "Scotland" was not straight as shown
on the plan. The plan reproduced on p. 218 shows that the eastern half of the
Scotland Yard boundary had two noticeable "kinks," and there was an
even more prominent one (see p. 224) near the western end. It is probable,
however, that the number of houses shown is accurate.

Apparently Parker's contention that Gardiner had no right to the
house was upheld, for on 21st March, 1610–11, the King granted it in
perpetuity at a rent of 20s. a year to Robert Elliot and William Awdeley.
The latter, on 14th June, 1611, transferred their interest to Sir John Parker,
who surrendered the property, (fn. n13) and on 17th March, 1611–12, received from
the King a freshgrant in perpetuity at the same rent. (fn. n14) There is some
evidence that the house was shortly afterwards rebuilt. (fn. n15) Parker's property
descended to his nephew, Sir Thomas Parker, who in his will, dated 28th
March, 1653, left (fn. n16) it to George, his eldest son. In 1663–4 George Parker
sold the premises to James "Crag." (fn. n17) In his will dated 11th November,
1669, (fn. n18) James "Cragg," of Westminster, cook, mentions three messuages
"neere Charinge Crosse." The one, "knowne by the name of the Talbott,
wherein I formerly lived," he left to his wife for life and afterwards to his
son Joseph. The other two, "the one in the occupation of Mr Alexander
Cully and the other called the Cheshire house," he left to Joseph. The latter
are to be equated with the two


portions of the adjoining house to the north,
formerly occupied by Sir John Parker, and The Talbot must therefore be
the house now in question. The frontage is shown on the plan of 1610 as
21 feet, but that of the later No. 20, Charing Cross, to which the house
corresponded, was only about 15 feet. The evidence of the ratebooks
suggests that the house was rebuilt at the time of the formation of Craig's
Court, and it thus appears that about 6 feet of the frontage was utilised for
the entrance into the court.

One of the earliest occupiers of the newly built house was George
Dewell, (fn. n19) who is shown there from 1707 to 1722. His widow continued
at the house until 1731, when she was succeeded by Paul Fourdrinier,
whose family occupied the premises until1810.

The site is now covered by the building of the National Bank (No. 15,
Whitehall).

Site of the former No. 19, Charing Cross. On 14th March, 1547–8,
the King granted (fn. n20) to William Horsley a 21 years' lease of a messuage
then in the latter's tenure. The Ministers' Accounts show that the original
lessee had been John Payne. Horsley, on 5th December, 1562, received
a new lease for 21 years, and on 17th June, 1573, a reversionary lease, also
for 21 years, from Michaelmas, 1583, was granted to Katherine Hampton,
who parted with her interest to John Ruff, who had married Horsley's
widow, Frances. Ruff died, and his widow married Thomas Walker, who
in 1590 applied for a fresh lease. The report on the application states that
the "now Tennante hath well repayred of late the said houses


otherwise than
common Fermors do use to doe, And I finde the now Tennante ready to
pull downe the backe parte of the building of the sayd house, for that the
same building ys a very weake buildinge, And he will newe builde the same
agayne at his owne Costes." (fn. n21) A lease for 33 years was granted to Frances,
now for the third time a widow, on 26th April, 1591, and on 25th September,
1601, she obtained a fresh lease for 50 years, on condition that she would
spend £60 in repair and rebuilding within the space of four years. (fn. n22) On the
following day Frances conveyed (fn. n23) to her son-in-law, Thomas Hibbots, and
Anne, his wife, all her "leases, Takings, goods & Chattles whatsoever."
The reasons she gave for this step were thatwills and Testamts of William Horseley
and John Ruffe deceased, my former husbands."

On 21st June, 1608, Hibbots sold (fn. n24) the lease to Sir John Parker,
who, on 6th June, 1609, obtained (fn. n25) a fresh lease for 60 years. He is shown
in the ratebooks as succeeding Hibbots in 1609, and his name continues
until 1617. On 5th February, 1629–30, Thomas Cary obtained a grant (fn. n26)
of this, among other property, for a term of 41 years after the expiry of
Parker's lease.

Sir John Parker

In 1651 the premises comprised two buildings, which in May of
that year were described as follows: (fn. n27)

"The Marmayde Taverne. (fn. n28) —All that Taverne or Tenemt
Comonly called … the Mermayd Taverne lying … nere Charing
Crosse … Consisting of an entrie at the Comeing in of the said
Taverne


of 58 feete in length from the Street backewards and three
feete in breadth, consisting of one Taverne Roome and one Kitchen
wth a Sellar under neath ye same, and above staires in the first Storie
two Roomes, and in the second storie two Roomes, and over the
same Two Garretts, the ground whereon the said House stands wth
a small Court yard Contayning forty eight feete in length, and in
breadth thirteene feete & ½, standing betweene the House of Sr
Thomas Parker South, and the House in the occupacion of Alice
Gifford north, and abutting on the ground of Sir Roger Palmer
on the East, and a House now the signe of the Crowne on the West,
now in the occupacion of one Mr George Oldfeild, and is worth
per Annum xx li.

"The Crowne—All that Tenement builtwth Timber and
Flemish wall and Covered with Tile, commonly called … the
Crowne scittuate … as aforesaid, and adioyning to the aforesaid
Tenemt, consisting of one faire shopp, and a Kitchen behind the
same Paved wth Purbeck stone, well fitted and ioynted, and one
Celler underneath the same, and above staires one faire Dyning
Roome next to the Street, and one Chamber, and a Clossett behind
the same, and in ye second storie two Chambers and two Clossetts,
and over the same a Garrett, divided into three Chambers. Also
one small sincke or Back-Court wth a Shedd there about tenn feete
square, now in the occupacion of Mr Malue, (fn. n29) and is worth per
Annum xl li."

In 1678 the premises were included (fn. n30) in the Manor of Westminster
granted to Sheldon and Charlton, who on 26th February,


1678–9, leased (fn. n31)
them to Thomas Slaughter, in trust for Joseph "Cragg." (fn. n32) They are
described as "a messuage" formerly in the occupation of Horsley, and leased
to Parker and Cary. Whether the use of "messuage" in the singular had
anything to do with it or not, it is a fact that when in 1752 Philip Craig
applied for a fresh lease, only one of the two houses was treated as coming
under the lease, the house in the rear passing as Craig's freehold.

Craig stated in his application (fn. n33) that the front house "having been
built near 80 years" (fn. n34) had become old and ruinous, and would require
rebuilding in a few years. At that time the widening of the street in front
of the premises was in contemplation (see appendix), but nodecision had been
reached as to which side was to be set back. In view of the possibility, therefore, that Craig's house might be wanted, consideration of his petition was
deferred until 1758, when on 30th November he obtained a new lease for
50 years. In 1799 General Francis Craig applied for a further lease. The
house was then said to be in the occupation of John Stevenson, hairdresser,
and was described as brick built, containing kitchen offices in the basement
storey, with three square storeys above and garrets, and to need an expenditure
of £200 on substantial repairs. General Craig obtained on 9th June, 1800,
a reversionary lease for 51 years and 126 days. In 1829 the freehold of the
house, with others, was transferred to the Vicar of St. Martin-in-the-Fields.

Site of the former Nos. 16–18,


Charing Cross.—In the Ministers'
Accounts for 1534–5 (fn. n35) we meet with two tenements, leased to Peter Cutler
and John Simpson, the history of which for over a century ran separately.

(i) On 6th October, 1546, a grant for life was made (fn. n36) to John Whatton,
mole-catcher to the King, (fn. n37) of Cutler's tenement, and on 17th June, 1573,
a reversionary lease for 21 years was granted to Katherine Hampton, (fn. n38) who
on the following day sold (fn. n39) her interest to Whatton. The latter died on
27th May, 1579, and in 1588 John Gardiner, who had acquired the
reversionary lease, surrendered it and applied for a fresh one. The tenement
was said to be in great ruin and decay. Gardiner, on 22nd June, 1588,
obtained a new lease for 31 years. (fn. n40) On8th December, 1631, the tenement
was granted (fn. n41) in perpetual fee farm to William Collins and Edward Fenn, who,
on 12th June, 1632, together with Sir William Russell, sold (fn. n42) property
at Charing Cross to Humphrey Chambers and Arnold Spencer, and the
two latter on 2nd June, 1638, parted with it to Valentine Saunders, junior,
under the title of all that tenement situated in a certain street near Charing
Cross late in the tenure of Peter Cutler. (fn. n43)

(ii) Meanwhile on 14th March, 1547–8, a 21 years' lease had been
granted (fn. n44) to Nicholas Urshaw ("Ursheus") of what was certainly Simpson's
tenement. (fn. n45) On 13th January, 1560–1, he obtained a new lease for the
same period, (fn. n46) and on 24th October, 1573, a reversionary lease, also for
21 years. Urshaw died in April,


1575, (fn. n47) and his widow conveyed her interest
to Thomas Smith and Rebecca his wife. (fn. n48) Smith, who was one of the grooms
of the Queen's scullery, surrendered the lease, and on 9th January, 1589–90,
obtained a fresh lease for 30 years. On his death Rebecca married Ralph
Harwood, who, with Silvester Harwood, on 24th February, 1604–5, conveyed
the lease to Anthony Hill. (fn. n49) In the following year (2nd August, 1606) Hill
obtained a fresh lease for 60 years. On 14th September, 1631, the premises
were granted in perpetual fee farm to Sir Henry Browne and John Cliffe,
junior, (fn. n50) who on 7th September, 1640, assigned (fn. n51) to Sir James Harrington
"all that Messuage … sometymes in the tenure … of Thomas Smyth and
nowe or late … of Anthony Hill." (fn. n52)

Wenow reach the period when for a time the two properties seem
to have been combined. In an assignment (fn. n53) dated 22nd February, 1648–9,
by Valentine Saunders and others to Sir William Brownlowe of a number
of messuages and tenements, all but three of which are identifiable as representing the sites of Nos. 11–15, Charing Cross, are included: "One other
Tenemt then or late in the tenure of Henry Hodgould, … And one other
Tenemt in the tenure of the sayd Henry Hodgould Wherein hee then lived
… And one other Tenemt then or late in the tenure of John Smythes."
Whether or no "John Smythes" is a mistake for "Thomas Smithes," it is
certain that "Henry Hodgould" is a misreading of "Henry Lidgold."
Lidgold's two houses are shown by the ratebooks to have been situated
respectively


Seagood's grandson, George, sold the northern portion to
Charles Wright. (fn. n55) It is described as consisting of the messuage "now in the
tenure … of Richard Crofts, (fn. n56) commonly called … the Rumer Taverne, (fn. n57)
containing in breadth in the front next Charing Crosse nineteen feet …
abutting South in the front part … on a messuage … now or late in the
tenure … of William Rogers, a poulterer, and North in the front part …
on a messuage … now or late in the tenure … of John Diton a haberdasher
of hatts, the said messuage … in the back part … abutting North on a
Certaine Messuage … now the Fountaine Taverne, now or late in the
tenure … of James Erwin … and South on a messuage … now orlate
in the tenure … of John Crips, Victualler."

On 2nd June, 1719, Wright sold (fn. n58) The Rummer to John Robinson
and Richard Arnold, and on 28th February, 1733–4, Ann Robinson (John's
widow) transferred (fn. n59) it to William Robinson. It was then described as "all
that Messuage … now in the tenure … of Richard Haddock, comonly
called … the Turks Head (fn. n60) and was lately the Rummer Tavern, (fn. n61) and the
Room and Shop lying under the Chamber, part of the said Messuage."
In 1767 William Robinson's widow and daughter sold (fn. n62) to Lancelot Reed
and John Holliday the messuage formerly of Richard Haddock, afterwards of Elizabeth Haddock, "and now or late in the Tenure … of Sophia
Lenoy (fn. n63) … formerly called … the Turk's Head, but now used as


… a
Bagnio." It was known as The Royal Bagnio in 1789. (fn. n64)

At the beginning of the nineteenth century the premises were
occupied by Francis Place, tailor and radical reformer. (fn. n65) In 1801 Place
removed from No. 29, Charing Cross, to "a much larger and more conspicuous shop … at No. 16, Charing Cross," (fn. n66) where he remained until 1817,
when he handed over the business to his eldest son. The premises apparently
included No. 17 at the rear.

No record of the sale by Seagood of the southern portion has
been found, but in 1717 it was in the possession of Thomas Tatlock.
A deed of 18th July in that year (fn. n67) relates to two freehold messuages,
one behind the other, in the tenure of Thomas Lawson, hosier, and Francis
Cripps, (fn. n68)victualler, and a later deed of 1737, (fn. n69) relating to the same two,
describes them as "one of them now known by the Sign by the Roebuck,
and now or late in the tenure … of William Kelly, and the other known
by the Sign of the Golden Key and late in the tenure … of Thomas Jackson."
The property, which in frontage corresponded with the later No. 18, Charing
Cross, has not been further traced. A part of it in the latter portion of the
seventeenth century had been in the occupation of Charles Blount or Blunt,
a well-known bookseller, the sign of whose house was the Catherine Wheel. (fn. n70)

The site of the whole of the premises, as well as that of the two
adjoining on the south, comprising altogether Nos. 16 to


20, Charing Cross, is
now covered by the building of the National Bank, No. 15, Whitehall.

Site of the former Nos. 11–15, Charing Cross.—In the Ministers'
Accounts for 1534–5 (fn. n71) are three items relating to tenements leased to Nicholas
"Orsewe," Richard Bryce and William "Colle alias Pynner." On
11th February, 1540–1, Henry VIII granted (fn. n72) to Sebastian "le Sene," the
King's clockmaker, a tenement lately built by the King, in which Sebastian
was then living, together with a court or vacant place with garden adjoining
the tenement, bounded on the north by the house of Peter "le Deulx," on
the east by the garden of John Rede, on the south by the tenement inhabited
by Richard Germanus (apparently Bryce), jeweller, and on the west by the
main road from Westminster to "Charyng Crosse." Later Ministers'
Accounts show thatthe tenement in question, which was the northernmost
of the three, was that previously leased to "Orsewe." (fn. n73) They also show
that the tenement was afterwards granted to Duddy Bonner. (fn. n74) On 21st April,
1573, a reversionary lease was made to David de "Lay" for 21 years from
Lady Day, 1584, of the tenement late in the tenure of Duddy Bonner. (fn. n75)

The two other tenements were on 14th March, 1547–8, leased (fn. n76) for
21 years to Richard Atsell, to whom at the request of Don Diego de Cordi
a reversionary lease of 30 years was granted (fn. n77) by Philip and Mary on 14th
July, 1557. Atsell died in 1565, leaving to John Read the lease of his house
after the death of his wife. (fn. n78) On 21st April, 1573, David


de Ley obtained a
lease for 21 years from Michaelmas 1599. The leases of all three tenements
were therefore in the hands of David de Ley, goldsmith, when on 15th February, 1606–7, new reversionary leases for 40 years were granted (fn. n79) to Thomas
Mery, chief clerk of the King's kitchen. On 5th February, 1629–30, Thomas
Cary, one of the grooms of the bedchamber, received a grant (fn. n80) of a reversionary
lease for 41 years (from 1660) of the two Atsell tenements, and on 10th April,
1639, his widow, Margaret, obtained a further lease for 41 years. (fn. n81)

On 22nd February, 1648–9, all the premises (the site of Sebastian's
tenement as well as of the two of Atsell), specified as in the tenure of Miles
Knight, gunsmith, Thomas Barnes, John Bevin, Thomas Darling and
John East,were assigned (fn. n82) by Valentine Saunders, Henry Barker and
Anthony Collins to Sir William Brownlowe for "all the residue and remainder
of yeares wch they … have therunto." Presumably Valentine Saunders had
acquired the leases.

In 1678 the whole was included in the Manor of Westminster granted
at the nomination of John Hall to Joseph Sheldon and Nicholas Charlton,
as "all that tenement nere Charinge Crosse, sometime in the tenure of
David de Ley … and all those two tenements, sometimes in the tenure of
Richard Atsell … and now held by — Browne, Cittizen of London, for
divers yeares yet to come."

On 23rd March, 1682–3, John Hall and Matthew Johnson conveyed (fn. n83)
the premises to Humphrey (afterwards Sir Humphrey) Edwin. They are
described in detail, and comprised: (i) The Three Tuns tavern, in the
occupation of William


Packe, (fn. n84) 46 feet east to west and 37 feet north to south,
(ii) The Three Feathers, adjoining (i) and containing 66 feet east to west,
10 feet in front and 17 feet in the rear, in the tenure of Joseph Hopkins,
(iii) A messuage next to (ii), 50 feet east to west and 11½ feet in front in
the occupation of … Benson, (iv) A messuage next to (iii) 58 feet east to
west, 11½ feet in front and 7 feet in the rear, formerly in the occupation of
Miles Knight and then of … Hawgood, (v) A messuage on the south side
of (i) 37 feet from east to west and 10 feet north to south, then occupied by
… Davison, and (vi) The Golden Sword next to (v), 25 feet east towest
and 10 feet north to south, then in the occupation of Henry Davison or Jonas
"Grasses", (fn. n85) haberdasher. The property was subsequently divided between
John Edwin and Humphrey Edwin, the former obtaining the sites of
Nos. 11 and 14, Charing Cross, and the latter the sites of Nos. 12, 13
and 15.

On 4th December, 1738, Humphrey Edwin obtained a reversionary
lease of the latter property for 30 years from 1756. It then comprised four
houses, one (the later No. 15) in the occupation of John Lutwiche (abutting
south on the house of Richard Haddock, and corresponding to The Golden
Sword mentioned above); two in the occupation of Robert Sidey and
James Puech (corresponding to the houses of Davison and Benson in 1683); (fn. n86)
and one (the later No. 12) occupied by James Howard (abutting east and
south


on Sidey's house, and north on the house of William Revis, and
corresponding to The Three Feathers in 1683). About 1750 the houses of
Sidey and Puech (then of Thomas Field and — Rook) were burnt down, and
were rebuilt as one house (the later No. 13). (fn. n87) On 26th May, 1759, Humphrey Edwin obtained a further reversionary lease to fill up his interest to
50 years. Nos. 13 and 15 are said to have become vested in his sister
Martha, who had married Sir Hew Dalrymple, and on 10th May, 1803,
their grandson, Sir Hew Dalrymple-Hamilton, obtained another lease of
these two houses for 53½ years from 5th April, 1808. The premises, occupied
by Mark Noble and John Rastrich, were in good repair, consisting of kitchen
offices in the basement and four square storeys above.(fn. n88)

The lease of No. 12 was on 29th January, 1777, sold to the occupier,
James Cullum, "sword cutler," (fn. n89) who on 15th August of the same year
obtained a Crown lease for a reversionary term of 18 years from 5th April,
1809. The lease came into the possession of Thomas Dawkins, cook, who
in 1816 applied for a fresh lease. When surveyed in 1821 the house, which
was an old one, consisted of kitchen offices in the basement with a vault
under the street and another under the yard, four square storeys above ground
and a garret in the front part of the roof. The plan then made of the premises
is here reproduced. A lease of 34½ years from 5th April, 1827, was
granted to Dawkins on 29th March, 1822.

Figure 44:

No. 12, Charing Cross


in 1821.

Copied from plan in the possession of H.M.
Commissioners of Crown Lands

John Edwin on 15th September, 1738,
obtained a reversionary lease for 30 years as from
Christmas, 1756, of the two houses, afterwards Nos.
14 and 11, Charing Cross, described as (i) the messuage, formerly called the Prince William, now the
Rummer Tavern, in the occupation of Christopher
Finch (corresponding to The Three Tuns mentioned
in 1683), and (ii) the messuage, called "the Artichoak"
(corresponding to the house of Hawgood), and on
3rd March, 1772, a fresh lease for 33 years as from
5th January, 1787, of the two houses was granted
to Lewis Way and Thomas Corbett in trust for
Elizabeth, only daughter of Charles and Elizabeth
Dalrymple, only daughter of John Edwin.

Of these two houses the more important (fn. n90)
was No. 14, known successively as The Three Tuns(fn. n91),
The Fountain, (fn. n92) The Prince William (fn. n93) and The Rummer. As the last it
figures in Hogarth's engraving Night(fn. n94) (Plate 111), published in 1738.
The house continued to be known by
that name well into the nineteenth century. (fn. n95)

Figure 45:

No. 14, Charing Cross in 1822.

Copied from plan in the possession of H.M.
Commissioners of Crown Lands

In 1770 the house was said to be
"Chiefly Built with Timber and …
much out of repair, now in the occupation
of Mathias Walsh." (fn. n96) It was probably
not entirely rebuilt, for when it was surveyed
in May, 1811, in connection with an application from the Earl of Balcarres (who
had married Elizabeth Dalrymple) for a new
lease, it was reported to be "very old, and
the floors to be much out of the level."
It then consisted of


cellars in the basement,
with three square storeys above the ground
and garrets in the roof, and a room in
the yard used as a bar covered with a
lead flat, and then in the occupation of
William Comyn. The plan made in 1822
is here reproduced.

The Artichoke (fn. n97) (No. 11) was in
1770 "an old Brick Messuage, in indifferent
condition … in the occupation of Willm
Woolaston."In 1780 the name had been
lost, for it is referred to (fn. n98) as a "Messuage … formerly called the
Artichoke." When surveyed in 1811 it was reported to be "very old,"
consisting of cellars in the basement and four square storeys above. The
plan made in 1822 is here reproduced.

All five of the houses were included in the exchange made in 1829
with the Vicar of St. Martin-in-the-Fields. The sites are nownumbered
5 to 13, Whitehall.

Figure 46:

No. 11, Charing Cross in 1822.

Copied from plan in the possession of H.M.
Commissioners of Crown Lands

Site of the former Nos. 9–10, Charing Cross.
On 24th June, 1533, Thomas (afterwards Sir
Thomas) Heneage wrote (fn. n99) to Cromwell, intimating
the King's pleasure that Pero, his yeoman cook,
should have his dwelling in one of the new houses
at Charing Cross, and on 10th December, 1539, a
grant was made (fn. n100) to Perot "le Doulce," (fn. n101) cook
pro ore both to Henry VII and Henry VIII, of the
tenement in which "Perott" then lived, situated
among other tenements of the king near "Charyng
Crosse," between the Hospital of the Blessed Mary
of "Rouncedevalle" on the north and others of
the King's tenements on the south, on the highway
leading from the City of London to the vill


of
Westminster on the west, and on the Cemetery of
the Hospital on the east. The grant was for 40
years from the following Lady Day.

By his will, (fn. n102) dated 14th July, 1555, "Petar
le Dowly" left to Ambrose "Gwynarte" the residue
of his estate. Ambrose Guenard died in November, 1558. (fn. n103) His will (fn. n104)
provided that the house in which he dwelt should be "devyded into
two partes … the one moietie therof lying towards the Wall of the
hous caled Rouncevall," i.e. the northern half, to be left to his wife,
Barbe, during her widowhood, and the other to his son Francis. It
is probable that a physical division of the premises was not intended: at
any rate there is no evidence that this took place so early. Francis Guenard
made several leases of theproperty to James Depree, the last being for the
remainder of the 40 years' term of the original grant. In spite of this, after
Guenard's death, John Fortune and William Jasper claimed the tenement
on the ground that they held a lease for the rest of the term, while Depree
on his side alleged that they had stolen his last indenture. (fn. n105) There is no
record of the result of the suit, but Depree managed to secure a reversionary
lease of the tenement, which had been granted (fn. n106) on 4th May, 1570, to Philip
Strelley for 21 years from 1580. Later on he surrendered this lease, and on
4th February, 1589–90, obtained a new lease for 31 years. (fn. n107) This was in turn
superseded by another lease for 40 years granted on 10th July,


1605, to
John Cokoe. (fn. n108) On 20th July Cokoe assigned his interest in the premises
to Eve Hickson, who on 20th September in the same year parted with it
to Gabriel Brewer, armourer. (fn. n109) Brewer was already in occupation, the
ratebooks showing him with "Widdowe Deprye" in 1597.

In 1610 Brewer seems to have applied for a new lease, (fn. n110) and in connection therewith called attention to the fact that the tenement was "in great
Ruine and Decay." This was confirmed, and the survey having disclosed
certain encroachments "made uppon the said Tenemt by other the neighbour
Tennants thereunto," a precise measurement was made, giving the following
details: length on the north side, 59 feet; length on the south side from
west to east 67 feet; width on the east side, 21 feet; width onthe west side,
26 feet; width in the middle near "le Corner wall" on which a brick chimney
was built, from north to south 27 feet. (fn. n111)

On 19th October, 1628, Sir Nicholas Fortescue obtained (fn. n112) a lease
of the premises for 31 years from the expiry of Cokoe's term, and on the
following day assigned it to Richard Holt and William Carrill. The latter
on 16th March, 1629–30, parted with it to Gabriel Brewer.

On 14th September, 1631, a grant of the tenement of Peter Cook
in perpetual fee farm was made to Sir Henry Browne and John Cliffe,
jun., (fn. n113) who on 4th February in the following year assigned it to Holt and
Carrill. The latter on 16th December, 1651, sold it to Sir Henry Croke, (fn. n114)
who had already (28th January, 1650–1)


purchased the fee farm rent. (fn. n115) We
therefore have at the end of 1651 Sir Henry Croke in possession of the
freehold and the heirs of Gabriel Brewer in the tenure of Fortescue's lease,
due to expire in 1676.

Brewer had divided the tenement into two houses, which in 1650 were
surveyed by order of Parliament. They are described as: (fn. n116)

"All that Tenemt built wth Tymber and Flemish Walle and
Covered wth Tyle scituate … neere unto Cheringcrosse …
consistinge of one Shopp and a Seller underneath the same, and
behinde the said Shopp one Kitchen paved wth Purbeck stone well
fitted and Joynted, alsoe one Court yard well paved. And above
stayres in the first story one dyneinge Roome Wainscoted, and one
other Roome behinde the same, And in the second story two Chambers,
and over thenowe in the occupacion of Mr Wolford and
is worth per annum xlli

"Memdd one Mr Brewer (a Papist in Armes) dwellinge in
Kent is the Reputed Landlord, But hath not made out his Title
to us. The said Tenemts are nowe under sequestration and the
Tenants pay there Rent to the state."

Gabriel Brewer had died in 1640, leaving (fn. n118) to his wife, Elizabeth,
"the Rents … of my two houses … wherein — Leech Esqr(fn. n119) and — Wright,
Stonecutter, doe now dwell." His own residence was in the rear of these
two houses on ground formerly belonging to the Hospital of Rounceval. (fn. n120)

Sir Henry Croke on 10th August, 1659, conveyed the premises
to Henry, his younger son, who on 15th February, 1659–60, sold
them to William Burnet. Burnet left them to his son Henry,


who on
12th December, 1676 (when the Fortescue lease had expired), leased them
for 51¼ years to Lionel Emps, who on 8th July, 1686, purchased the
freehold from William Burnet, brother of Henry. (fn. n121)

The premises continued in the ownership of the Emps family until
1717. (fn. n122) On 19th February, 1716–7, Joseph Prestwood, nephew and heir
of Frances Emps, sold to John Robinson the southern of the two houses
(No. 10, Charing Cross), and on 10th April, 1717, the northern also (No. 9). (fn. n123)
Ann Robinson, John's widow, on 28th February, 1733–4, parted with both
houses, in the occupation of John Pigou, linen-draper (No. 9), and Samuel
Weather, linen-draper (No. 10), to William Robinson, (fn. n124) whose widow,
Isabella, sold them (fn. n125) on 14th August, 1767, to Lancelot Reed and John
Holliday. They were then inMajesty's proclamacions since Michaelmas in the 13 yeare of his … raigne"
is included "the house of Abraham Chapman betweene Charingcrosse and Whitehall, built with
timber and jutties and cant windowes." (Cal. of Acts of Privy Council, 1617–19, p. 283.)

n17. Final concord between James "Crag," Isabella his wife and George Parker, concerning
one messuage, two cottages, one garden and half a messuage, in perpetuity. (P.R.O., C.P 25 (2)
689–Hilary, 15–16 Chas. II.)

n19. "The Black Memorial or a List of the Names of those pretended Judges who State and
sentenced to Death our Sovereign King Charles I … Sold by … G. Dewell, Stationer, at the
Bell and Dragon, between Charing Cross and Whitehall." (The Post Boy, 1–3rd January, 1712–3.)

n32. The two houses were already in the possession of the Craig family before the grant


of
1678, for they are mentioned in the will of James Craig (see p. 242). It is possible that they had
been included in the sale by George Parker in 1663–4, whose lease had still some years to run.

n34. The ratebooks suggest that the occupiers of the front house from 1650 were: Penny
Malhew (to 1664), George Stockdale (1666–79), Isaac Rowhouse (1680–84), Robert Wood
(1685–93), Mrs. Wood (1694–1712), John Robinson (1713–25), John Franklin (1725–58). This
list affords no clue as to when the rebuilding took place. The Hearth Tax Roll for 1674 shows the
two houses as in the occupation of George "Stockdall" and "Alexr Culley," assessed at 8 and
11 hearths respectively.

n51. P.R.O., L.R. 1/60, fo. 1. The meaning of the grant is not very clear. If it was a sale
Harrington did not longidentified as Lawrence Courtney (1687–97),
John Poulteney (1698), Samuel Cooke (1699–1703), Richard Crofts (1704–28), Wm. Clements
(1728–30), Richard Haddock (1730–51) (this is a mistake; he died in 1748), Sophia Lenoy
(1752–65), Olivia Harington (1766–77).

n57. "Left in a Hackney Coach on Monday Night last, about 10 of the Clock, that took a
Gentleman up at the Rummer-Tavern at Charing-Cross, and set him down in Holborn, A Scarlet
Cloak trimm'd with Gold, and Gold Lace Button-Holes, with a Green Velvet Cape. If the
Coachman, or any other Person will give an Account of the same, so that it may be had again, to
Mr Crofts at the Rummer aforesaid, he shall have a Guinea Reward and no Questions ask'd."
(The Post Boy, 3–5th February, 1712–3.)

n60. In Haddock's will (P.C.C., 299 Strahan, dated 7th May, 1731, and proved 5th


October,
1748), he describes himself as "Master of the Turk's Head Bagnio near Charing Cross." There was
another Turk's Head Bagnio on the other side of the road, see p. 102.

n61. The old title of The Rummer had now been transferred to the adjoining property on the north,
which is described as a messuage, "now called the Rummer, which lately was the Fountain Tavern."

n63. Elizabeth, Richard Haddock's widow, named Sophia Lenoy her executrix, and left to
her the use of all her goods, chattels, effects, etc., not otherwise disposed of for the term of her life or
until marriage. (P.C.C., 12 Bettesworth, dated 14th December, 1751, proved 8th January, 1752.)

n64. Indenture, dated 17th March, 1789, between Joseph Rushworth and Dorothy Bean
concerning the "Messuage … at Charing Cross, known by the name of theRoyal Bagnio, late in
the tenure of Mrs [Olivia] Harrington." (Middx. Register, 1790, II, 25.)

n65. Francis Place was born in 1771. He was apprenticed to a leather-breeches maker and
afterwards became an independent journeyman. In 1793 on a strike in the trade Place was chosen
organiser. He also became secretary to a number of trade clubs and for a time was active in the
advocacy of reform. He studied much to improve his education, and in 1807 again entered political
life in support of the candidature of Sir Francis Burdett for parliament. For many years he worked
hard and successfully for radical reform, and his library at Charing Cross was a regular resort for
politicians of the same views. His influence declined after the passage of the Reform Bill. He died
in 1854 at Hammersmith.

n66. Graham


Wallas's Life of Francis Place (1898), p. 33. Wallas quotes Place's own account.
"I put in … a new front as elegant as the place would permit. Each of the panes of glass in the
shop front cost me three pounds, and two in the door four pounds each … Such shop fronts were
then uncommon; I think mine were the largest plate-glass windows in London, if indeed they were
not the first … Fitting up the shop cost me nearly three hundred pounds … There were five
large Argand lamps in the shop, besides candles, to make the windows and every part of it as nearly
equally light as possible."

n70. He is shown in the 1681 ratebook as succeeding Joshua Mildmay, and his residence
therefore probably dated from 1680. He was a "publisher ofmedical books, plays and novels.
Amongst the latter may be noticed The Mock Clelia, advertised in Mercurius Civicus, April 22nd,
1680, and A. Oldy's Fair Extravagant, 1681 … In the same number he also advertised a translation of one of the novels of Cervantes, called The Jealous Gentleman of Estremadura. His last
advertisement was in the issue of Michaelmas, 1684" (Plomer's Dictionary of Booksellers and
Printers, 1668–1725, p. 39). His last appearance in the ratebook is in 1687.

n73. The tenement of "Orsewe" is said in 1534–5 to be that next adjoining to that of Peter
Cook, who was also known as Peter "le Deulx" (see p. 254), a fact which puts beyond doubt the
identity of the two.

n84. "Information of Samuel Jevon, drawer to Mr Pack, vintner, of the Three Tun tavern,
Charing Cross. Standing


247.

n94. The view is looking north towards the King's statue, but the engraving is reversed, the
east side of the road being shown on the left hand, and the west on the right (notice the barber
is apparently shaving with his left hand). For The Cardigan's Head and The Bagnio on the right
hand, see pp. 125 and 102. Next to The Rummer on the left hand is The New Bagnio, i.e.,
Haddock's establishment, see p. 248. The Rummer bears not only the sign of that name (a rummer
was a kind of large drinking glass) but a bunch of grapes. The full sign was therefore probably
The Rummer and Grapes. At The Rummer and Grapes Tavern, Westminster, one of the three
leading freemasons' lodges used to meet (Larwood's History of Signboards, p. 239), andif this could
be equated with the tavern at Charing Cross, it would appear likely that it was from this tavern
that the intoxicated freemason (usually taken to represent Sir Thomas De Veil, the magistrate)
was being led home by the tyler of his lodge.

n95. This is the fifth Rummer met with in the neighbourhood, and it would seem convenient
here to sum up the information with regard to them. (i) The earliest, in 1683, was one of the
houses on the west side of the road, probably on the site of the timber yard (see p. 78). (ii) The
Rummer Eating House is found in 1712, on the same side of the road, a little further north,
probably on the site of Samuel Prior's establishment (see p. 84). (iii) There must have been a
Rummer


still further north, which gave its name to Rummer Court, in existence in 1754 (see p. 89).
(iv) No. 16, Charing Cross, on the east side of the road, was known as The Rummer in 1706
and 1719, but in 1731 the sign had been changed to The Turk's Head and the place converted into
a bagnio. (v) With the change of sign of (iv) No. 14, Charing Cross, became The Rummer. It will
be seen from the above that at various dates there must have been a Rummer on each side of the
street. There are also references (undated) in the Advertisements of Curiosities, preserved in the
British Museum, to the Two Blue-Posts and Rummer, near Charing Cross, and The Mitre and
Rummer at Charing Cross. Both The Blue Posts and The Mitre wereon the west side of the
street. For The Blue Posts see p. 78. The Mitre is described as "opposite Craigg's Court" in an
advertisement in The Daily Advertiser for 23rd December, 1741, quoted by MacMichael, Charing
Cross, pp. 61–2.

n96. P.R.O., T. 55/15, pp. 362–3. Walsh had succeeded Mrs. Owen. "On Sunday Mrs Owen,
who kept the Rummer Tavern by Charing-cross was suddenly taken ill, sitting in her chair, fell
down and expired immediately" (The London Chronicle, 25–26th March, 1765). "Edward"
Owen is shown in the ratebooks for this house from 1749 to 1765.

n97. Known in 1719 as "the Golden Lyon" (indenture, dated 8th December, 1719, between
Thomas, Charles and John Edwin and others—Middx. Register, 1721, VI, 103).

n102. Westminster Wills, 83 Bracy. He is probably the same as "Petrus Lyddosse," buried at
St. Martin's on 1st


Cleaning up the mess: Bank resolution in a systemic crisis

Daniel Gros, Dirk Schoenmaker

In Greece, the problem is an insolvent government bringing down the banks. In Spain, the problem is now insolvent banks bringing down the government. This column argues that despite their differences, the potential costs to the rest of Europe mean that both problems require a European solution.

The diabolic loop between the solvency of the banking system and the sovereign fiscal position is now apparent (Lane 2012).

In Greece, it is the insolvency of the government that has sunk the banks;

In Spain, the banks are sinking the government.

What is common in both countries is that savers are running away when they see the banks and the sovereign propping each other up. Unless the banks in both Greece andof the Eurozone banking system. (By contrast, in the case of Ireland the national government had to bear all the cost of preventing a potential destabilisation of the Eurozone banking system through a haircut on senior bondholders.)

Once this has been done and the ESM is satisfied that the restructured cajas (Spanish savings banks) are sound, they could be immediately admitted to a European deposit guarantee scheme. A decisive intervention of the ESM should thus be sufficient to re-establish confidence in the Spanish banking system and stem the deposit flight which has already reached alarming proportions.

2. Stem the deposit flight from Greece

Here, the banking system was effectively bankrupted by the sovereign. Greek banks held Greek government bonds equivalent (in nominal value) to over 200% of capital. The Greek banking


Under a canopy of soldiers' drawn swords as church bells tolled, Prince Guillaume of Luxembourg and Belgian Countess Stephanie de Lannoy emerged smiling Saturday from the tiny duchy's Notre Dame Cathedral after wrapping up a two-day wedding gala with a religious ceremony.

With a celebratory fireworks show still to come, onlookers and well-wishers lined the super-scrubbed streets near the cathedral and roared with joy as the newlyweds looked down from a red velvet-covered palace balcony, and haltingly - but deeply - kissed for the crowd.

The church wedding of Prince Guillaume - the 30-year-old heir to the throne and Luxembourg's grand duke-to-be - and the Belgian countess drew top-drawer guest list. It came a day after a civil ceremony at Luxembourg City Hall.

The bearded groom and his 28-year-old blonde bridewere trailed by a procession of well-known royals, including Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands, Princess Victoria and Prince Daniel of Sweden, Prince Naruhito of Japan, and Britain's Prince Edward - Queen Elizabeth's youngest child - and his wife, Sophie.

Stephanie plans to renounce her Belgian citizenship in order to - one day - become Luxembourg's grand duchess. The tiny country wedged between France, Belgium and Germany is an important financial center and continues to prosper despite Europe's economic trouble.

Stephanie wore a lace Elie Saab dress with a 5-meter-long wedding train during the ceremony, which was conducted in a mixture of French, German and Luxembourgish. It began with a minute's silence to honor her late mother, Countess Alix de Lannoy.

The nuptials gave tiny Luxembourg - a founding member of the


predecessor of the European Union - a rare moment in the international media spotlight. With a population of just over 500,000, the trilingual duchy punches above its weight: Besides being an important financial center, it's home to the world's largest steel manufacturer and it boasts the second-highest gross domestic product per capita in the world, more than $80,000.

Luxembourg began as a Roman fortress. It has, at one time or another, fallen under the control of Spain, France and Austria. In 1839, it gained its independence from the Netherlands, but lost more than half its territory to Belgium. Germany overran Luxembourg twice in the 20th century despite its protests of neutrality.

The current grand duke, Henri, who is 57, is popular. People can greet him on the street without bowingdown before him. His 31-year marriage to Grand Duchess Maria Teresa appears to be very happy.

The newlyweds seem to be happy too: In public appearances, including at the London Olympics, they have appeared besotted with each other.

After watching the ceremony on a big-screen on a public square near the cathedral, royal-gazing fans sensed the joy and historical importance.

"It was a really big moment - a really beautiful moment," said Claudine Als, clutching a glass of Champagne, seemingly awaiting a toast. "It is a historic day for Luxembourg, the country shines throughout the world."


Barack Obama in 2012. In 2017, the Trump administration announced it would phase out the program, alleging that it was illegal from the very beginning.

Several lawsuits argued that Trump´s planned termination of DACA violates federal law requiring certain procedures before major rules are changed, as well as equal protection and due process guarantees.

Federal courts issued nationwide injunctions blocking the administration´s plans to end DACA and forcing the continuation of program renewals. The Supreme Court took up the cases before lower courts had fully heard them, an unusual step. A hearing was held in November in front of the Supreme Court, which could issue its ruling at any time before June.

That means the final decision on DACA could come in the middle of census field operations, which start inremote areas of Alaska in January and continue through several phases up until the end of July.

More than 700,000 people in the United States have active DACA permits, and they often live in mixed-status families with others who have a variety of immigration situations or are native-born citizens. People may fear that they are putting family members in some kind of danger by naming them in the household´s census response.

But that is not so, said Daniel Sharp, legal director for the Central American Resource Center in Los Angeles, a leading organization helping young immigrants with DACA become aware of their rights under terms of the policy.

Sharp worries that DACA holders or their families won´t participate in the census due to the misconception that their name and other information


Welcome to the Norfolk Island Museum's blog. We are lucky to be located in the most beautiful part of a stunning island in the South Pacific. We are a little island, but our history and stories are great - from Polynesian and convict settlements to the home of the Bounty mutineers. Hopefully you'll enjoy our stories.

Thursday, December 4, 2014

The museum received a generous donation
this week from Peter Rossiter, great-grandson of Thomas Rossiter. In 1859 Thomas
was the first ‘outsider’ to be appointed on Norfolk Island by Governor Denison
when he took up the position of government Storekeeper and school teacher. There
are a number of descendants of Thomas and his wife Charlotte Bissox on Norfolk
Island today as two of their sons married two of Isaac Robinson and Hannah
Quintal’s daughters. There arealso today descendants of Thomas’s sister Jane
on Norfolk, who came here with him and married Franklin Bates.

Nancy and Peter Rossiter with Museum curator Lisa Richards

Peter was born on Norfolk and spent most of
his school years here until moving away soon after the War with his family. He and
wife Nancy now live in Ballina and have regularly visited the island over the
years. A number of years ago they donated the surveyors chain used to mark out
much of Norfolk Island and especially the Mission land; and a steelguard used
by Isaac Robinson to weigh things such as bags of wheat etc. Peter’s donation
this week includes important original documents including Land Grants, Supplementary
Instructions to Thomas’ role; and the 1871 certificate appointing him as
Registrar of Norfolk Island, issued by Samuel Richard Earl of


…Among the last-minute entries were two men who registered a black pick-up truck called Azteca Warrior, according to media reports and Ensenada city spokesman Daniel Vargas. One of the men, registered as Pablo Gonzalez, was tracking the race team’s progress in a helicopter (60 miles west of the city of Ensenada ) when it crashed into high-tension wires, killing Gonzalez and another passenger and injuring two pilots.

Two people who said they were relatives of Gonzalez showed up at the morgue Wednesday and tried to claim the body, but were not allowed to take it, authorities said. A few minutes later, the gunmen struck. …The convoy of 14 vehicles pulled up in front of the city morgue on Calle Guadalupe. The attackers stormed the building, snatched a corpse, loadedAn overwhelming majority of Germans support same-sex marriage, a new survey has found.

The poll, conducted by survey company Emnid for Sunday newspaper Bild am Sonntag revealed that 75 percent of Germans favour full legal equality for gay people in life partnerships.

Only 20 percent opposed the concept, while 5 percent had no opinion.

This amount of support is higher than it was in the UK the day before same-sex marriage became legal in 2014.

On that day, a poll carried out by the BBC found that 68 percent agreed gay marriage should be permitted, with 26% opposing it.

Though same-sex couples are permitted to enter unions in Germany, the government has ruled out any progress on equal marriage due to a strict coalition agreement.

At present, Germany is governed via a Grand Coalition


30 million euro to compensate those affected.

And in February, German drag queen Olivia Jones played an important role in choosing Germany’s new president, Frank-Walter Steinmeier.

The 47-year old was one of 1,260 voting delegates of the Green Party who choose Joachim Gauck’s new successor.

Steinmeier is anti-Trump, just like the editor of top German newspaper Die Welt, who earlier this year said Germany should be “more gay” in order to tackle the problems posed by the new US president.It's the kind of question Canada's best legal minds might spend hours debating: How important is it to stick to one's own code of accountability?

Last night, Canada's justice minister attended a private, invite-only reception for lawyers at the offices of prominent Bay Street law firm Torys LLP in Toronto. Guests paid $500 to mingle with Jody Wilson-Raybould.

As she left the event, the minister told a reporter, "All MPs are called upon to help raise the money for the Liberal Party to engage Canadians in the political process. I am here, as an MP, to do just that."

Yet the MP turned up with the justice minister's senior policy advisor, Jessica Prince. Wilson-Raybould's office says Prince attended the event as a volunteer.

It's a pretty safe bet that not one of


the people at last night's event shelled out 500 bucks to meet with the MP for Vancouver Granville. And it's unlikely any of the guests from Toronto's legal community spent the evening talking about potholes and mail delivery in British Columbia.

In fact, the invitation for the event mentioned Wilson-Raybould's "extraordinary mandate, which includes an inquiry into missing and murdered indigenous women, the legalization of marijuana and assisted-dying legislation."

To be clear, the people who attended Thursday night's event did nothing wrong. They were offered access to the justice minister because it was for sale.

But that kind of "pay to play" fundraising activity is not allowed under the Liberal government's code for open and accountable government, which Prime Minister Justin Trudeau brought in at the end of November.

In the mandateC. xanthogramma

C. xanthogramma may refer to:

Carrhotus xanthogramma, a spider species
Choreutis xanthogramma, a moth species


* The Braves played here for one game only; most of the grandstand was to be dismantled shortly thereafter.

In March of 2016 it was announced that the Atlanta Braves would host a special game on the evening before Independence Day at Fort Bragg, North Carolina. Planning and bulldozing began soon thereafter, and construction was completed with just a few days to spare before July 3. The resulting baseball field and (mostly) temporary grandstand is thus considered one of those odd anomalous stadiums such as Hiram Bithorn Stadium in San Juan, Puerto Rico. Like Colt Stadium in Houston, Fort Bragg Field is a rudimentary, roofless single-deck ballpark with symmetrical outfield and straight fences. It also has the characteristic of long field dimensions in the power alleys, although the distancesdown the foul lines were normal. In addition to small bleacher sections next to the bullpens in each corner, there are large sloped "standing room only" areas across most of the outfield. Those are rendered in green in the diagram above, because they were evidently made of artificial turf, so that fans could enjoy a picnic during the game. It is also noteworthy that the Braves chose to hold this special game away from their "normal" home in Atlanta, the soon-to-be-vacated Turner Field . Although this was an official game, it was only open to military personnel stationed at Fort Bragg, which is the home of the 82nd ("All American") Airborne Division, one of the combat units participating in the D-Day invasion of France in 1944. The one


The moment a skydiver was knocked unconscious during a 12,500ft jump has been caught on camera.

James Lee collided with another diver moments after they jumped from a plane at a skydiving site in Wiltshire.

He was rescued by quick-thinking friends, who grabbed hold of him and deployed his parachute.

Mr Lee said he "came around" as the parachute opened.

Claire Brennan reports.

Footage courtesy Newsflareaxially aligned spaced relationship and are interlockingly received in recesses or slots of an axially upwardly projecting reinforcement wall of the housing upper end adjacent the opening thereof. The pivot pin receiving slots or recesses open radially outwardly and each includes a narrow entrance portion and a larger blind end. The polymeric/copolymeric material temporarily yields as the pivot pins are moved radially inwardly through the entrance portions during the assembly of the cover to the container body and eventually seat and pivot in the blind ends, but once the material at the entrance portions inherently returns to its unflexed position, the pivot pins are prevented from escaping therefrom thereby retaining the cover upon the container body absent extraneous/additive/separate hinges, screws, bolts or the like, as are utilized in


buy back more of its stock is meant to reassure investors that the market value of the company won't fall to a point where it might become a takeover target.

Although Adobe's long term future has been questioned with products such as Flash getting usurped by HTML5, the firm's stock price has been on an upward trajectory since December 2011. With the firm buying up stock, the aim is to ensure that the price remains steady at the very least. µMonocular horizontal OKN in observers with early- and late-onset strabismus.
Several reports on monocular optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) in observers with strabismus have found that asymmetry of OKN tends to occur in both eyes of observers with an early onset of strabismus but only in the deviating eye of those with a later onset of strabismus. Our objective was to quantify and compare the magnitude of the OKN asymmetry in each eye as a function of observer's age at onset of strabismus. We studied monocular OKN in ten observers with early-onset (up to 24 months of age), seven observers with late-onset (after 24 months of age) unilateral strabismus, and 12 normally sighted control observers. In the deviating eye, observers with early-onset strabismus showed large OKN asymmetries in favour of nasalward


Ron has spent three years seeking to connect with people who have no place to live. His office is on the streets, in the parks, under the bridges, and along the creek banks of Fremont, Hayward, and Livermore.

Ron is a member of HOPE Project at Abode Services, a team that works with people who are living on the street.

The team’s goal is to build a trusting relationship with every person team members meet. That trust is built through repeated contacts and helpful offerings from outreach team members, such as snacks and water.

Earning trust is the first step in the journey to a new home. With a trusting relationship, an outreach team member can begin offering support to a person who is working towards a life in a newhome.

People are routinely assisted with getting an identification card, figuring out their social security number or applying for veteran benefits. Many are connected to health services.

Together, the services build a platform towards moving a person into a home.

To earn trust, outreach team members try to leave a lasting first impression. Every team member has a car trunk full of supplies. When team members seek out those in need, they carry backpacks stuffed with water bottles, granola bars and fruit snacks.

And when they approach an encampment, they make their intentions clear.

"HOPE Project! HOPE Project," Ron and fellow outreach team member Cassandra Kovalkevich shouted during a recent excursion in Hayward.

The people living in the roughly two dozen tents began to rustle around.

"We have some water and some snacks," Ron said


as he stands about five yards away from the encampment.

Eventually, a man peeked through his tent door and began talking with Ron and Cassandra.

"I could use some water, thanks," the man said as Ron began offering snacks, hand sanitizer and some wet wipes.

Since the man appeared willing to engage in further conversation, Ron asked for the man's name and provided him with information about our mobile health clinic and information on how he can contact Ron in the future when he is seeking services.

"Thanks, I'm gonna check this out," the man said.

Encounters like these are routine for the outreach team, which visits encampments on almost a daily basis.

It's important for outreach workers to strike a balance between being forward enough to spark a conversation, but not so aggressivea woman on his list. The woman was seen the day before, asking for change in front of a Lucky's Supermarket.

Ron didn't find the woman, but found a couple who were homeless and in need of help.

Ron gave both his business card and information about the mobile clinic. Once back in his car, Ron logged the interaction with the couple. He recorded their names, where he met them, and the date and time.


An Oshawa art gallery has apologized for displaying a mature-content warning in an exhibit that included a video of two men kissing.

Douglas Boyce, who grew up in Oshawa and now lives in Toronto, complained after noticing the warning at an exhibit at the Robert McLaughlin Gallery by local artist Andil Gosine, titled All the Flowers, at the end of February.

Stepping into the gallery, Boyce said he noticed a small sign that said “‘This exhibition contains mature content,’ which is something I’ve never noticed in visiting the art gallery in years past.”

Initially, Boyce said he was unsure what the objectionable content was, whether it was a pun incorporating the phrase “glow job” or a reference to killer Luka Magnotta.

However, after speaking to the gallery’s curator, he believes the warningStory highlights Trump: "This is why our country doesn't work."

Fire marshal unfazed by Trump gibe

(CNN) Donald Trump and members of his Secret Service detail were briefly trapped in an elevator Friday before a campaign rally in Colorado Springs.

They were rescued by firefighters with the Colorado Springs Fire Department , which lowered a ladder into the elevator, allowing Trump and his entourage to climb out.

Two Trump campaign sources confirmed the incident to CNN. The story was first reported by the Denver Post.

Trump eventually took the stage at the rally, where he opened his remarks by blasting the local fire marshal for shutting off entry to his campaign event due to capacity restrictions.

"This is why our country doesn't work," Trump said as he slammed the Colorado Springs fire marshal during


City, Atlantic County, New Jersey, in which the [plaintiff] was alleged to have participated.  This State Grand Jury investigation was personally conducted by the defendant, Joseph A. Hayden, Jr., Deputy Attorney General of the State of New Jersey.

4
5. The plaintiff, Edwin H. Helfant, was a designated target of the State Grand Jury investigation and was so advised by the Deputy Attorney General aforedesignated, who was handling the matter, when he first appeared before the State Grand Jury on October 18, 1972 at which time he resorted to his privilege under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution and refused to testify.

5
6. He was subsequently subpoenaed to appear again before the State Grand Jury on November 8, 1972.  The State Grand Jury at that time satat the State House Annex, Trenton, New Jersey at the other end of the hall from the private chambers of the Chief Justice and Justices of the New Jersey Supreme Court.

6
7. On November 6, the Administrative Director of the Courts of New Jersey called the law offices of the plaintiff in Atlantic City, New Jersey.  About 3:30 in the afternoon, after being given the message of this call, plaintiff returned the call to the Administrative Director.  He was directed by the Administrative Director to appear before the Supreme Court in their private chambers at 10 minutes before 10 on November 8, 1972.  The plaintiff advised the Administrative Director that at 10 o'clock he had to appear before the Grand Jury.  The Administrative Director advised


the plaintiff that the Supreme Court was well aware of this fact and that he was still to be before the Supreme Court.  No reason was given for this appearance and no other direction to appear, other than the telephone message of the Administrative Director made to the plaintiff directly, and to his office.  At or about the designated time on November 8, 1972 the plaintiff went into the chambers of the Supreme Court at the State House, Trenton, New Jersey.  He was questioned by the Chief Justice and Associate Justice Sullivan in the presence of the Court.  The Chief Justice inquired of the defendant whether he thought a Judge should invoke the Fifth Amendment.  Justice Sullivan asked what the plaintiff's feelings wereabout a Judge sitting in judgment of other people while he himself was invoking the Fifth Amendment before a Grand Jury.  He also asked plaintiff if he had sat as a Judge since invoking the Fifth Amendment.  Chief Justice Weintraub and another Justice also asked of plaintiff some questions about his son's Bar Mitzvah, which matters were contemporaneously being considered by the State Grand Jury, including seating arrangements and who paid for the liquor.  These questions also concerned an Abe Schusterman, who was a State's witness against the plaintiff and who had appeared before the State Grand Jury.  The Chief Justice also questioned plaintiff about Atlantic County Judge Thomas Rauffenbart and about an ice-making machine that was involved in an alleged pay-off in a


criminal case involving Abe Schusterman, all of which matters were then being considered and investigated by the State Grand Jury which was being conducted by the defendant Joseph A. Hayden, Jr. under the direction of Attorney General George F. Kugler.

7
The questions posed to the plaintiff by the Justices of the Supreme Court were in connection with matters then being considered by the State Grand Jury.  There had been no public release of these matters, particularly the Bar Mitzvah, seating arrangements thereat, arrangements for the liquor and the gift of an ice machine.  These matters had to be a portion of the raw evidence then being considered by the State Grand Jury and released and given to the Supreme Court during the pendency of the Grand Juryproceedings by defendant Deputy Attorney General Joseph A. Hayden, Jr., who was conducting the Grand Jury investigation.

8
After the plaintiff left the Supreme Court chambers, he was in a state of confusion and bewilderment and had to go immediately before the State Grand Jury.  On a previous occasion before the State Grand Jury he had encountered three State's witnesses who were then in State and County Prisons serving sentences for various crimes, two of said witnesses having long records.  He had been advised by Detective William Sullivan of the New Jersey State Police, who was assisting Deputy Attorney General Hayden in the investigation, of the thrust of some of the testimony of these witnesses, which testimony if believed would incriminate the plaintiff.  He was therefore in


a position that if he testified at variance with these witnesses, even though it were the truth, the State Grand Jury would be faced with inconsistent statements and could indict him for false swearing, as he was.  He was faced with the proposition that if he agreed with the testimony of these witnesses, he could be indicted for conspiracy, as he was.  Knowing of these witnesses, i. e., John Cantoni, Shelly Kravitz and Abe Schusterman, their reputations and backgrounds and long records of convictions, plaintiff was aware that they had to have testified as a result of promises and commitments made to them in connection with shortening their prison stays, which facts were later admitted by the Deputy Attorney General Joseph A. Hayden, Jr. in connectionwith answers made to discovery wherein he admitted that recommendations of leniency and dropping of charges had been made in the cases of all three men.

9
8. As a result of these questions, the plaintiff, whose previous counsel-advised intentions and will were completely discarded and overcome and who was quite emotionally upset by the confrontation, indicated to the Justices that he would indeed waive his Fifth Amendment privilege and testify in full before the State Grand Jury, fearing not only the loss of his Judgeship, but his accreditation as a member of the bar as well.

10
9. Immediately after the plaintiff left the chambers of the New Jersey Supreme Court, Deputy Attorney General Joseph A. Hayden, Jr., who was then conducting the State Grand Jury investigation of which plaintiff was


a target, went into the Supreme Court chambers and stayed there for a short period of time and then left.  It is believed he preceded the plaintiff into the chambers and that he had previous contact about plaintiff with the Supreme Court about the pending investigation."

The complaint also alleges:

11
"14.  As a result of the intrusion by the Deputy Attorney General and the disclosure to the Supreme Court of factual matters involved in a Grand Jury investigation during pendency of that investigation, and because of the intrusion of the New Jersey Supreme Court into the Grand Jury investigation and the communication between the Supreme Court of New Jersey and the Deputy Attorney General conducting the Grand Jury investigation, the plaintiff herein is made to suffer great, immediate,substantial and irreparable harm in that he must attempt to defend criminal charges brought in a State in which there has been prejudicial collusion directly affecting plaintiff, whether intentional or inadvertent between the Judicial and Executive branches of the New Jersey State government.  Plaintiff is being made to defend criminal charges which have been obtained, inter alia, as a result of that collusion, and the deprivation of plaintiff's constitutional rights by not too subtle cooperative coercion on the part of the defendants.  Furthermore, in the event of his conviction upon any one of the charges presently pending against him, plaintiff's only recourse would be review by the State Courts and ultimately the New Jersey Supreme Court, which Court he has alleged has been involved in the


his allegedly coerced testimony.  He sought, in the state court, to have the indictment dismissed because it was based on the coerced testimony, but his motion was refused, and the state appellate courts declined to entertain his appeal.

59
If the district court should determine, after an appropriate evidentiary inquiry, that this plaintiff's Fifth Amendment right has been abridged, in the factual setting of this case an exception to Younger's precept of non-interference would obtain.1

1
 Although the plaintiff names as defendants the Justices of the Supreme Court of New Jersey as well as that State's Attorney General, the final injunction, if issued, may be limited to the Attorney General, prohibiting him from continuing criminal proceedings against plaintiff.  It should also be noted that plaintiff does not seek moneyin.

4. First President to preside over a cut to the credit-rating of the United States.

5. First President to violate the War Powers Act.

6. First President to be held in contempt of court for illegally obstructing oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico.

7. First President to require all Americans to purchase a product from a third party.

8. First President to spend a trillion dollars on “shovel-ready” jobs when there was no such thing as “shovel-ready” jobs.

9. First President to abrogate bankruptcy law to turn over control of companies to his union supporters.

10. First President to by-pass Congress and implement the Dream Act through executive fiat.

11. First President to order a secret amnesty program that stopped the deportation of illegal immigrants across the U.S., including those with criminal convictions.

12. First


President to demand a company hand-over $20 billion to one of his political appointees.

13. First President to tell a CEO of a major corporation (Chrysler) to resign.

14. First President to terminate America’s ability to put a man in space.

15. First President to cancel the National Day of Prayer and to say that America is no longer a Christian nation.

16. First President to have a law signed by an auto-pen without being present.

17. First President to arbitrarily declare an existing law unconstitutional and refuse to enforce it.

18. First President to threaten insurance companies if they publicly spoke out on the reasons for their rate increases.

19. First President to tell a major manufacturing company in which state it is allowed to locate a factory.

20. First President to file lawsuits againstthe states he swore an oath to protect (AZ, WI, OH, IN).

21. First President to withdraw an existing coal permit that had been properly issued years ago.

22. First President to actively try to bankrupt an American industry (coal).

23. First President to fire an inspector general of AmeriCorps for catching one of his friends in a corruption case.

24. First President to appoint 45 czars to replace elected officials in his office.

25. First President to surround himself with radical left wing anarchists.

26. First President to golf more than 150 separate times in his eight years in office.

27. First President to hide his birth, medical, educational and travel records.

28. First President to win a Nobel Peace Prize for doing NOTHING to earn it.

29. First President to go on multiple “global apology


tours” and concurrent “insult our friends” tours.

30. First President to go on over 17 lavish vacations, in addition to date nights and Wednesday evening White House parties for his friends paid for by the taxpayers.

31. First President to have personal servants (taxpayer funded) for his wife.

32. First President to keep a dog trainer on retainer for $102,000 a year at taxpayer expense.

33. First President to fly in a personal trainer from Chicago at least once a week at taxpayer expense.

34. First President to repeat the Quran and tell us the early morning call of the Azan (Islamic call to worship) is the most beautiful sound on earth.

35. First President to side with a foreign nation over one of the American 50 states (Mexico vs Arizona).

36. First President toSo which part of Brazil did you serve in?
I served in Porto Alegre North
Well that's how they say it in Brazil, down in the South.
Ok well I served my church mission in
Los Angeles California and I kind of decided to
go because everybody else, guys, I knew at BYU
they went anyway and I'm the only convert
to the church from my family and my parents didn't like
the idea of me going on a mission at all.
I never thought I would go but I just kind of jumped on the
train and it was definitely
a life changing experience.
One of the first things I memorized on my mission
was the first vision of Joseph Smith. Me too.
And I must have shared it at least 10 times a day
with people I met there.
But then after


Smith actually wrote
specifically for the public instead of all of the
other accounts that were mostly from private
letters or personal journal entries.
But why wasn't there and the record of the First Vision
until like 12 years after it happened?
Well, that's a long time. But you gotta remember Joseph
Smith is a 14 year old farm boy. He's basically illiterate.
He's not accustomed to coming home and
writing things down until the Lord basically
commands him to do it in Section 20 of the
Doctrine & Covenants, which eventually prompts the
1832 account that we have of the First Vision.
Also, after all the negative attention the First Vision
received in the early days, Joseph and the
whole Smith family were more careful about
sharing the sacred experience with others
and often didn't actively talk about it unless they felt that theysince we publish this video series on Youtube,
I'll just add you know more questions
and answers that people have
of the First Vision in the video description.
I just think it's really funny, like a lot of the
objections that people either fine or that they create.
It's like a lot of them aren't even issues.
Like he was he 14 or was he 15
when he had the First Vision?
I mean, I don't know
how that could actually be proof that the whole thing's fake?
Prophet Gordon B. Hinckely,
15th President of the Church, said once:
"I'm not worried that the Prophet, Joseph Smith,
gave a number of versions of the First Vision
anymore then I'm worried that there are four
different writers of the gospels in the New Testament,
each with his own perceptions,
each telling the events to meet his own


The History of Infant Formula: Quality, Safety, and Standard Methods.
Food-related laws and regulations have existed since ancient times. Egyptian scrolls prescribed the labeling needed for certain foods. In ancient Athens, beer and wines were inspected for purity and soundness, and the Romans had a well-organized state food control system to protect consumers from fraud or bad produce. In Europe during the Middle Ages, individual countries passed laws concerning the quality and safety of eggs, sausages, cheese, beer, wine, and bread; some of these laws still exist today. But more modern dietary guidelines and food regulations have their origins in the latter half of the 19th century when the first general food laws were adopted and basic food control systems were implemented to monitor compliance. Around this time, scienceLife stories

Don José locked in his house, when ALAS first met him

José

Don José was taken by the army 25 years ago, while he walked in the street. He was held for three days, threatened with torture. He witnessed horrible things (fear and sadness are evident when he tells his story). He was then release but since that moment, he began to feel an intense fear of being caught again; every time he left his home he felt he was being followed.

A few months later, the symptoms worsened; every time he left his house, he “froze” (describing classic panic attacks), and if he saw anyone from the army he would suffer episodes of “reliving” the kidnapping and would run to hide in his home. He was also unable to


sleep because he had constant dreams related to he event. Because of this and to avoid the attacks, he isolated himself in his house, getting to the point in which it had been 20 years since he left his house at all.

ALAS provided Don José with group therapies, anti-depressant and anxiolytic drugs during over 4 years. Don José is now able to go out of his house again, although only when he is accompanied by his wife. He joins a monthly group therapy where he participates actively to social, religious and cultural activities. He also became an ambassador of ALAS when he went to Guatemala City to tell his story to hundreds of people on the International Mental Health Day.

Don José telling his story during the International MentalHundreds of children – including 60 in the UK – at "significant risk" of abuse from named paedophiles have been removed from immediate danger after British police helped destroy what they believe is the largest online paedophile network in the world.

The three-year operation exposed more than 70,000 members across the UK, US, New Zealand, Australia and Thailand, and led to 184 arrests internationally, 121 of them in Britain.

The investigation, Operation Rescue, led by the UK's national centre for child protection, was joined by Europol, the US immigration and customs enforcement agency, and police from Australia, New Zealand, the Netherlands and Canada. It identified 670 suspects and 230 abused or at-risk children globally. Some of the first arrests were made in Thailand.

Police were unable to say how many children


had been taken into care as a result of the investigation. One suspect, a scout master whose case is still pending, was arrested 24 hours before a camp where he was allegedly planning to abuse a named boy in his care.

Offenders were tracked to countries including Italy, Spain and Thailand. Details were revealed at a press conference in The Hague, the Netherlands, where the website's server was based.

The network hid behind boylover.net, a legal forum which attempted to function covertly by operating as a discussion-only forum where members could share their sexual interest in young boys without committing any offence. But members, having made contact, would then move to more private channels such as email to exchange and share images of children being abused.

In the UK, the 240suspects included police officers, teachers and youth leaders, with an age range of 17 to 82. One of the UK suspects was a woman. To date, 33 have been convicted, including John McMurdo, 36, a scout leader from Plymouth, who was jailed in January last year after admitting possessing and distributing child pornography, and Lee Palmer, who was sentenced to six years in prison in March 2010 after pleading guilty to the sexual abuse of two boys, aged two and nine. Police discovered more than 60,000 indecent images on his computer.

Peter Davies, the UK police chief who leads the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (Ceop), and is also the UK's lead for child protection, said: "The scale and success of Operation Rescue has broken new ground. Not