label
stringclasses 2
values | a1
stringlengths 38
277
| a2
stringlengths 38
277
| sentence
stringclasses 22
values |
|---|---|---|---|
a2 | we should not ban fossil fuels because it would dramatically limit the use of container ships and undermine international trade. | fossil fuels are cheap sources of energy the allow us to create and move commodities cheaply, therefore reducing the costs of everything we buy or consume | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a1 | banning fossil fuels makes production of energy more expensive, increasing the cost of living for everyone. | fossil fuels are more efficient in terms of the amount of energy they produce per amount used. | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a2 | given the two main problems with fossil fuels are that fossil fuels usage is extremely air pollution and that thay are consumeable, their usage does not immediately harm anyone and so should not be banned. | today we are too much dependent on fossil fuels and the share of clean energy is not high enough, so we can't ban it with no sufficient alternatives | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a2 | countries try to break dependence of controversial countries and want to create more stable market. thus they are already looking for alternative energy sources. no need to entirely ban. | we should not ban fossil fuels because in many places there simply is no alternative and we cannot treat the people who live there as less valuable than others. | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a1 | there aren't enough viable alternatives for fossil fuels, so we won't have things like electricity, therefore millions will die | the government shouldn't pass policies without the popular consent of the citizens, banning fossil fuels would be incredibly unpopular. | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a1 | this removes the only competitive advantage that many developing countries have - selling natural resources. this means they will have no way to survive | fossil fuels are the only way to power war meachins like tanks and planse that are needed to defend countrys | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a1 | fossil fuels are important sources of income for many countries, without them they'll likely collapse | only a complete fool would ban fossil fuels before green tech is fully developed | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a1 | we should not ban fossil fuels because without access to cheap, easy energy poor countries will not be able to rapidly develop and will be trapped in poverty. | fosile fule are the chepest thing that can help the developing word to get to the level of the developed world. | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a2 | hurts specifically developing countries which depend more on fossil fuels than developed countries, while developing countries need more help | the alternatives to fossil fuels right now are much more polluting because they consume more energy | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a2 | we have already taken global warming too far, fossil fuels will prove a higher standard of living while we wait out the clock. | if we ban fossil fuels too quickly, this could have a negative effect on society because it might slow down or eliminate transportation options for some people. | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a1 | we should not ban fossil fuels because it would dramatically limit the use of container ships and undermine international trade. | only a complete fool would ban fossil fuels before green tech is fully developed | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a2 | fossil fuels are located in countries with politically controversial agendas. the mutual dependence of diverse energy producers and buyers create deals and interactions between countries. we need fossils as they are the base for deals. | jobs destroyed by a ban won't be replaced with jobs for as low of a level of education (since greener energy needs more researchers and engineers than miners), leaving many permanently out of work. | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a1 | we should not ban fossil fuels because without access to cheap, easy energy poor countries will not be able to rapidly develop and will be trapped in poverty. | this removes the only competitive advantage that many developing countries have - selling natural resources. this means they will have no way to survive | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a1 | the alternatives to fossil fuels right now are much more polluting because they consume more energy | we have already taken global warming too far, fossil fuels will prove a higher standard of living while we wait out the clock. | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a2 | in places with extreme weather conditions walking to public transportation or not being able to heat your house can be very dangerous. | we should not ban fossil fuels because it would cause international chaos as economies like russia and brazil lost huge industries and had to scramble to replace them. | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a1 | fossil fuels are important sources of income for many countries, without them they'll likely collapse | fossil fuels are the only way to power war meachins like tanks and planse that are needed to defend countrys | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a2 | renewable energy is being developed and in the mean time it is just cheaper to use fossil fuels | banning fossil fuels will require individuals to buy new electric cars, which means people in poverty will no longer be able to afford transportation. | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a1 | fossil fuels are a cheap energy source and banning it would greatly increase the price of living | banning fossil fuel will increase the price of renewable energies constructions | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a2 | we have already taken global warming too far, fossil fuels will prove a higher standard of living while we wait out the clock. | we should not ban fossil fuels because it would cause international chaos as economies like russia and brazil lost huge industries and had to scramble to replace them. | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a1 | changing from fossil fuels to clean energy is a highly costly move because the government would have to build new nuclear power plants, at the expense of using that money to deal better with pollution | given the two main problems with fossil fuels are that fossil fuels usage is extremely air pollution and that thay are consumeable, their usage does not immediately harm anyone and so should not be banned. | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a2 | many current workplaces are based on the use and production of fossil fuels, thus banning it will result in great unemployment | fossil fuels are cheap sources of energy the allow us to create and move commodities cheaply, therefore reducing the costs of everything we buy or consume | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a2 | fossil fuels are the thing that anable the modern western world and all the research in science. if we would stop using it we will roll the modern world back to the midle age. | if we ban fossil fuels too quickly, this could have a negative effect on society because it might slow down or eliminate transportation options for some people. | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a2 | the free market is solving this as we speak. there is no need to ban fossil fuels, as we are already creating alternatives that don't need the interim turmoil | we should not ban fossil fuels because it would actually be more wasteful to stop using perfectly good infrastructure decades before it wears out, especially given the huge up front costs. | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a1 | if we ban fossil fuels too quickly, this could have a negative effect on society because it might slow down or eliminate transportation options for some people. | the free market is solving this as we speak. there is no need to ban fossil fuels, as we are already creating alternatives that don't need the interim turmoil | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a1 | the alternatives to fossil fuels right now are much more polluting because they consume more energy | the government shouldn't pass policies without the popular consent of the citizens, banning fossil fuels would be incredibly unpopular. | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a1 | we should not ban fossil fuels because in many places there simply is no alternative and we cannot treat the people who live there as less valuable than others. | the free market is solving this as we speak. there is no need to ban fossil fuels, as we are already creating alternatives that don't need the interim turmoil | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a1 | changing from fossil fuels to clean energy is a highly costly move because the government would have to build new nuclear power plants, at the expense of using that money to deal better with pollution | fossil fuels are located in countries with politically controversial agendas. the mutual dependence of diverse energy producers and buyers create deals and interactions between countries. we need fossils as they are the base for deals. | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a1 | this will give rise to nuclear energy which will make the world a much more dangerous place | fossil fuels are the only way to power war meachins like tanks and planse that are needed to defend countrys | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a1 | we should not ban fossil fuels because in many places there simply is no alternative and we cannot treat the people who live there as less valuable than others. | fossil fuels are the thing that anable the modern western world and all the research in science. if we would stop using it we will roll the modern world back to the midle age. | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a1 | a lot of jobs would be taken away because a lot of factories depend on it. | only a complete fool would ban fossil fuels before green tech is fully developed | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a1 | fossil fuels are a cheap energy source and banning it would greatly increase the price of living | only a complete fool would ban fossil fuels before green tech is fully developed | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a1 | this removes the only competitive advantage that many developing countries have - selling natural resources. this means they will have no way to survive | we have already taken global warming too far, fossil fuels will prove a higher standard of living while we wait out the clock. | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a2 | the government shouldn't pass policies without the popular consent of the citizens, banning fossil fuels would be incredibly unpopular. | banning fossil fuels at this point is simply not feasible , without causing an economic collapse. | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a1 | we should not ban fossil fuels because without them we would not be able to produce as much food as we do presently, which could put food security at risk in some countries. | it is unjustified to ban fossil fuels, it is individual people's choices whether to use products that were created using those fuels, and whether to use those themselves | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a1 | we should not ban fossil fuels because despite what we would wish, there is no viable alternative yet, and it is unethical to use people's suffering as a means to an end to develop one. | fossil fuels are the thing that anable the modern western world and all the research in science. if we would stop using it we will roll the modern world back to the midle age. | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a2 | we should not ban fossil fuels because it would dramatically limit the use of container ships and undermine international trade. | the alternatives to fossil fuels right now are much more polluting because they consume more energy | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a1 | we should not ban fossil fuels because without access to cheap, easy energy poor countries will not be able to rapidly develop and will be trapped in poverty. | we should not ban fossil fuels because the ban would be unenforceable and would just lead to exxon et al. moving to countries with less regulation. | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a2 | changing from fossil fuels to clean energy is a highly costly move because the government would have to build new nuclear power plants, at the expense of using that money to deal better with pollution | we should not ban fossil fuels because without them we would not be able to produce as much food as we do presently, which could put food security at risk in some countries. | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a1 | jobs destroyed by a ban won't be replaced with jobs for as low of a level of education (since greener energy needs more researchers and engineers than miners), leaving many permanently out of work. | the free market is solving this as we speak. there is no need to ban fossil fuels, as we are already creating alternatives that don't need the interim turmoil | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a1 | banning fossil fuels would bring down huge companies supporting lots of workers that would be sent home with no means to help their families | countries try to break dependence of controversial countries and want to create more stable market. thus they are already looking for alternative energy sources. no need to entirely ban. | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a2 | world is largely based on technology. technology is currently largely based on fossil energy. banning it would not allow people to properly use technology and urge them to use primitive devices. | fossil fuels are cheap sources of energy the allow us to create and move commodities cheaply, therefore reducing the costs of everything we buy or consume | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a1 | fossil fuels are the cheapest and most common form of energy there is, so it is far more available to the poor who can't afford anything else | today we are too much dependent on fossil fuels and the share of clean energy is not high enough, so we can't ban it with no sufficient alternatives | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a1 | we should not ban fossil fuels because without them we would not be able to produce as much food as we do presently, which could put food security at risk in some countries. | today we are too much dependent on fossil fuels and the share of clean energy is not high enough, so we can't ban it with no sufficient alternatives | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a2 | fossil fuels are located in countries with politically controversial agendas. the mutual dependence of diverse energy producers and buyers create deals and interactions between countries. we need fossils as they are the base for deals. | we should not ban fossil fuels because it would actually be more wasteful to stop using perfectly good infrastructure decades before it wears out, especially given the huge up front costs. | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a1 | we already have all of the infrastructure for fossil fuels, making them cheap and reliable, this will not be the case for alternative energy which will cause massive inconsistency in people receiving their energy. | fossil fuels are located in countries with politically controversial agendas. the mutual dependence of diverse energy producers and buyers create deals and interactions between countries. we need fossils as they are the base for deals. | We should not ban fossil fuels |
a1 | doping will enhance athletes performance and there for they will be able to break new records. breaking new records is an achievement that pushes athletes to excellency. | the essence of sport is to watch humanity reach it's peaks, and doping helps in achieving that, just like special clothes or shoes did in the past | We should legalize doping in sport |
a1 | legalizing doping will allow the government to regulate the sale and consumption such that they can prevent truly dangerous treatments and protect athletes. | doping by definition is using drugs that help your performance; any drugs that do more harm than good would still be banned, so no real harm is done. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a1 | by making it legal, we can also monitor it, which would end the more serious problems of forcing people to dope against their will, and people overdosing because of lack of knowledge & supervision. | many things athletes do hurts them physically. running destroys your knees, weight lifting hurts the joints and generally the chances of getting wounded are very high. doping do not produce significantly different damage. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a2 | doping is happening anyway, allowing athletes to come forward reduces risks and gives them access to better healthcare | legalizing doping will allow the government to regulate the sale and consumption such that they can prevent truly dangerous treatments and protect athletes. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a2 | current methods of legally doping (like hypoxic tents that increase hematocrit) are much more expensive than regular doping will be after legalization, which will serve to make the same tools more accessible to everyone. | many athletes need supplements in order to recover properly from training and injuries that naturally arise from sport, so legalizing doping would allow for the best treatments for athletes when they are injured. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a1 | more companies would invest in developing better, healthier medicine (and drugs) because now there is an active legal market for them in the professional sports industry. | doping becomes safer. when athletes dope right now they have to do it in risky ways, and don't go to doctors for help. legalizing it encourages regulation. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a2 | 1. doping is a choice: -people generally have the right to bodily autonomy. especially athletes can make free and informed choice to harm their bodies through copious training. they have info through docs and internet. | because doping is beneficial for athletes' recovery times, legalizing doping would allow for athletes to have longer, more productive careers where they can maximize the short window of their athletic peak. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a2 | most people take interest in sport ( like the olympics ) when records are being brake and adding drugs to sports meaning that note records will brake = sport will be more entertaining | doping by definition is using drugs that help your performance; any drugs that do more harm than good would still be banned, so no real harm is done. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a1 | legalization of doping prevents us from having to decide which drugs are too enhancing (for example, why creatine isn't considered performance enhancing while erythropoeitian is), which is a necessarily arbitrary process. | doping by definition is using drugs that help your performance; any drugs that do more harm than good would still be banned, so no real harm is done. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a1 | drugs would allow athletes to recover better from injuries so they can return to sport faster and won't be deterred of practicing sport in the first place | we should legalize doping in sport because it will drive down the costs of hormonal treatments that may be prohibitively expensive in the status quo. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a1 | if doping is legal, it will no longer be done under the table, so athletes will do it in secure environments with supervision from medical experts and team doctors. | people should be allowed to do with their body as they wish, and sports organizations should not limit individuals bodily autonomy by banning doping. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a2 | every human has a right to do anything to himself, since it's no danger to others and therefore the state has no right banning him from doing it. | because doping is beneficial for athletes' recovery times, legalizing doping would allow for athletes to have longer, more productive careers where they can maximize the short window of their athletic peak. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a2 | it's already done, this would allow rule abiding athletes to compete on an even playing field | the illegal doping black market endangers athletes' lives, and it would be safer to legalize and regulate it. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a2 | doping lets us explore the upper limit of human capability, which will allow players to play harder and beat more records. | legalized doping will create better and safer substance that is better regulated and better treated in the case of causing physical harms. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a2 | people have the right to do things that harm their bodies if they deem that the outcome is worth it for themselves (such as choosing to drink alcohol or smoke cigarettes). | many athletes need supplements in order to recover properly from training and injuries that naturally arise from sport, so legalizing doping would allow for the best treatments for athletes when they are injured. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a1 | current methods of legally doping (like hypoxic tents that increase hematocrit) are much more expensive than regular doping will be after legalization, which will serve to make the same tools more accessible to everyone. | it would make the poor gened people feel like they too can participate in sports, while today they don't bother to start because they think they weren't born with the right abilities. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a1 | doping would allow athletes to maximize their athletic ability, and so legalizing doping would increase the overall quality of sports. | human race will reach its limit dinner or latter but new drugs will develop endlessly , so it means that sport will get better endlessly | We should legalize doping in sport |
a1 | athletes should have the right to do what they want to their own body, even if some worry it is unsafe - we allow people to do things that could hurt themselves all the time. | most people take interest in sport ( like the olympics ) when records are being brake and adding drugs to sports meaning that note records will brake = sport will be more entertaining | We should legalize doping in sport |
a1 | because doping is beneficial for athletes' recovery times, legalizing doping would allow for athletes to have longer, more productive careers where they can maximize the short window of their athletic peak. | doping will enhance athletes performance and there for they will be able to break new records. breaking new records is an achievement that pushes athletes to excellency. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a2 | 1. doping is a choice: -people generally have the right to bodily autonomy. especially athletes can make free and informed choice to harm their bodies through copious training. they have info through docs and internet. | many athletes need supplements in order to recover properly from training and injuries that naturally arise from sport, so legalizing doping would allow for the best treatments for athletes when they are injured. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a1 | the increased excitement about sports that legalizing doping will generate will cause more people to invest in teams, buy merchandise, and go to games, which is good for the sports industry. | using drugs is no different from the other advantages athletes try to utilize, such as wearing the best shoes and attire, shaving hair off their bodies, eating healthy, and more. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a1 | doping happens today in all major sports leagues anyway, but athletes who become addicted and suffer bodily harms are unable to report and get help due to the ban. | most people take interest in sport ( like the olympics ) when records are being brake and adding drugs to sports meaning that note records will brake = sport will be more entertaining | We should legalize doping in sport |
a2 | doping is happening anyway, allowing athletes to come forward reduces risks and gives them access to better healthcare | the illegal doping black market endangers athletes' lives, and it would be safer to legalize and regulate it. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a2 | makes drugs more accessible due to technological advances and that balances between the highest achievers which are usually drug users to other less affluent athletes | athletes have already approached the limit of what can be done with the human body alone, if we want any further progress in sports we have to legalize doping. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a1 | if doping is legal, it will no longer be done under the table, so athletes will do it in secure environments with supervision from medical experts and team doctors. | many things athletes do hurts them physically. running destroys your knees, weight lifting hurts the joints and generally the chances of getting wounded are very high. doping do not produce significantly different damage. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a1 | like vitamins, doping can be healthy in correct amount, sports give a controlled environmentto improve the field | athletes have the right to decide on their own what is the best way to treat their body | We should legalize doping in sport |
a2 | even with the access to performance enhancing drugs, being a professional athlete still requires an immense amount of natural talent, so doping does not take away from the impressive nature of athletes' skills. | if doping is legal, it will no longer be done under the table, so athletes will do it in secure environments with supervision from medical experts and team doctors. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a1 | legalized doping will create better and safer substance that is better regulated and better treated in the case of causing physical harms. | athletes who dope are capable of achieving greater athletic feats, which brings more entertainment for viewers and followers of sports. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a1 | doping allows athletes to push their limits, which makes sports more entertaining and interesting to watch. | like vitamins, doping can be healthy in correct amount, sports give a controlled environmentto improve the field | We should legalize doping in sport |
a1 | people should be allowed to do with their body as they wish, and sports organizations should not limit individuals bodily autonomy by banning doping. | it will allow new types of sports to develop in the future ( for instance if a drug that will allow breathing under water, water soccer could be developed | We should legalize doping in sport |
a1 | doping would allow athletes to maximize their athletic ability, and so legalizing doping would increase the overall quality of sports. | it's already done, this would allow rule abiding athletes to compete on an even playing field | We should legalize doping in sport |
a1 | legalizing doping represents an adaptation to new technology and is a natural progression of the rules in the same way that sport adapted to better athletic clothing and shoes. | the essence of sport is to watch humanity reach it's peaks, and doping helps in achieving that, just like special clothes or shoes did in the past | We should legalize doping in sport |
a2 | people have the right to do things that harm their bodies if they deem that the outcome is worth it for themselves (such as choosing to drink alcohol or smoke cigarettes). | by making it legal, we can also monitor it, which would end the more serious problems of forcing people to dope against their will, and people overdosing because of lack of knowledge & supervision. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a2 | sports are ultimately are businesses and should frame there decision making around what best draws the most views to make more money: doping allows for a continuous power creep fulfilling this burden. | legalizing doping will let us shift focus from whether an athlete is doping to whether the athlete is maintaining their physical health while doping, which is preferable (ex. maintaining safe, if high, levels of testosterone). | We should legalize doping in sport |
a2 | the health risks of doping are not meaningfully distinct from the normal risks of being an athlete, so a ban doesn't actually physically protect athletes. | legalizing doping would prevent situations in which athletes who are taking drugs legally for their health get punished (such as when human growth hormone is used post-injury). | We should legalize doping in sport |
a2 | human race will reach its limit dinner or latter but new drugs will develop endlessly , so it means that sport will get better endlessly | doping improves preformance in sport and thus makes it more fun to watch. athletes will make more money because of it. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a1 | sports now becomes more fair, because doping allows athletes to correct for the random birth lottery - now, one athlete isn't better than another just because they were born with more testosterone | the goal of sports is stretching the human limits and achieving outstanding results. we allow already unhealthy habits for this purpose: overworking, unhealthy diets, lack of sleep etc. why not drugs as well? | We should legalize doping in sport |
a1 | legalization of doping will increase the appeal of sports by allowing players to have more impressive accomplishments -- more home runs, more impressive plays, etc. | people should be allowed to do with their body as they wish, and sports organizations should not limit individuals bodily autonomy by banning doping. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a1 | legalizing doping would prevent situations in which athletes who are taking drugs legally for their health get punished (such as when human growth hormone is used post-injury). | using drugs is no different from the other advantages athletes try to utilize, such as wearing the best shoes and attire, shaving hair off their bodies, eating healthy, and more. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a2 | every human has a right to do anything to himself, since it's no danger to others and therefore the state has no right banning him from doing it. | if doping is legal, it will no longer be done under the table, so athletes will do it in secure environments with supervision from medical experts and team doctors. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a1 | athletes who dope are capable of achieving greater athletic feats, which brings more entertainment for viewers and followers of sports. | just as we enable aerodynamic swimsuits or running shoes, doping enables us to test the true limits of the human body. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a1 | like vitamins, doping can be healthy in correct amount, sports give a controlled environmentto improve the field | athletes are adults who can make decisions for themselves and the state has no right to interfere. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a2 | in the status quo doping happens but the government can't collect taxes, if we legalized doping the government will be able to collect tax revenue and put that into social spending. | even with the access to performance enhancing drugs, being a professional athlete still requires an immense amount of natural talent, so doping does not take away from the impressive nature of athletes' skills. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a1 | legalization of doping will increase the appeal of sports by allowing players to have more impressive accomplishments -- more home runs, more impressive plays, etc. | every human has a right to do anything to himself, since it's no danger to others and therefore the state has no right banning him from doing it. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a1 | doping is no different than other performance-enhancing techniques being used in sports today | some professionals athletes are already using drugs so making it ligal makes the competition fair | We should legalize doping in sport |
a2 | even with the access to performance enhancing drugs, being a professional athlete still requires an immense amount of natural talent, so doping does not take away from the impressive nature of athletes' skills. | many athletes need supplements in order to recover properly from training and injuries that naturally arise from sport, so legalizing doping would allow for the best treatments for athletes when they are injured. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a2 | drugs are just an extension to human abillitie like any other gear such as shoes or diving suits because they affect everyone the same, so legalizing them should be no different than legalizing shoes | current methods of legally doping (like hypoxic tents that increase hematocrit) are much more expensive than regular doping will be after legalization, which will serve to make the same tools more accessible to everyone. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a1 | legalizing doping will allow the government to regulate the sale and consumption such that they can prevent truly dangerous treatments and protect athletes. | doping becomes safer. when athletes dope right now they have to do it in risky ways, and don't go to doctors for help. legalizing it encourages regulation. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a2 | it would make the poor gened people feel like they too can participate in sports, while today they don't bother to start because they think they weren't born with the right abilities. | doping by definition is using drugs that help your performance; any drugs that do more harm than good would still be banned, so no real harm is done. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a1 | professional athletes are likely to have a supervised doping regime, massively reducing risks | it's a legitimate choice for athletes to make, just like becoming athletes in the first place | We should legalize doping in sport |
a2 | every human has a right to do anything to himself, since it's no danger to others and therefore the state has no right banning him from doing it. | legalizing doping will allow legitimate top scientists to work on creating safer and more effective drugs where they are currently created by worse scientists willing to do illegal things. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a1 | legalized doping will create better and safer substance that is better regulated and better treated in the case of causing physical harms. | countries use doping regardless since the drugs are hard to notice. allowing all countries to use it will make the competition more equal. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a2 | countries use doping regardless since the drugs are hard to notice. allowing all countries to use it will make the competition more equal. | people should be allowed to do with their body as they wish, and sports organizations should not limit individuals bodily autonomy by banning doping. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a1 | we should legalize doping in sport because most people probably want better sports and thus democratic will supports legalization. | people watch sports because of the entertainment value, players who dope can play a more entertaining and intense game because they are stronger. | We should legalize doping in sport |
a2 | every human has a right to do anything to himself, since it's no danger to others and therefore the state has no right banning him from doing it. | drugs would allow athletes to recover better from injuries so they can return to sport faster and won't be deterred of practicing sport in the first place | We should legalize doping in sport |