Dataset Preview
Viewer
The full dataset viewer is not available (click to read why). Only showing a preview of the rows.
The dataset generation failed
Error code:   DatasetGenerationError
Exception:    DatasetGenerationError
Message:      An error occurred while generating the dataset
Traceback:    Traceback (most recent call last):
                File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 2011, in _prepare_split_single
                  writer.write_table(table)
                File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/arrow_writer.py", line 583, in write_table
                  self._build_writer(inferred_schema=pa_table.schema)
                File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/arrow_writer.py", line 404, in _build_writer
                  self.pa_writer = self._WRITER_CLASS(self.stream, schema)
                File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/pyarrow/parquet/core.py", line 1016, in __init__
                  self.writer = _parquet.ParquetWriter(
                File "pyarrow/_parquet.pyx", line 1869, in pyarrow._parquet.ParquetWriter.__cinit__
                File "pyarrow/error.pxi", line 154, in pyarrow.lib.pyarrow_internal_check_status
                File "pyarrow/error.pxi", line 91, in pyarrow.lib.check_status
              pyarrow.lib.ArrowNotImplementedError: Cannot write struct type 'tables_metadata' with no child field to Parquet. Consider adding a dummy child field.
              
              During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:
              
              Traceback (most recent call last):
                File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 2027, in _prepare_split_single
                  num_examples, num_bytes = writer.finalize()
                File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/arrow_writer.py", line 602, in finalize
                  self._build_writer(self.schema)
                File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/arrow_writer.py", line 404, in _build_writer
                  self.pa_writer = self._WRITER_CLASS(self.stream, schema)
                File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/pyarrow/parquet/core.py", line 1016, in __init__
                  self.writer = _parquet.ParquetWriter(
                File "pyarrow/_parquet.pyx", line 1869, in pyarrow._parquet.ParquetWriter.__cinit__
                File "pyarrow/error.pxi", line 154, in pyarrow.lib.pyarrow_internal_check_status
                File "pyarrow/error.pxi", line 91, in pyarrow.lib.check_status
              pyarrow.lib.ArrowNotImplementedError: Cannot write struct type 'tables_metadata' with no child field to Parquet. Consider adding a dummy child field.
              
              The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:
              
              Traceback (most recent call last):
                File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/job_runners/config/parquet_and_info.py", line 1316, in compute_config_parquet_and_info_response
                  parquet_operations, partial = stream_convert_to_parquet(
                File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/job_runners/config/parquet_and_info.py", line 909, in stream_convert_to_parquet
                  builder._prepare_split(
                File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 1882, in _prepare_split
                  for job_id, done, content in self._prepare_split_single(
                File "/src/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 2038, in _prepare_split_single
                  raise DatasetGenerationError("An error occurred while generating the dataset") from e
              datasets.exceptions.DatasetGenerationError: An error occurred while generating the dataset

Need help to make the dataset viewer work? Open a discussion for direct support.

abstract
string
acknowledge
string
sections
list
appendix
list
metadata
dict
paper_id
string
whole_ref_to_labels
dict
missing_citation_labels
dict
All possible evolution scenarios of a thin vacuum shell surrounding the spherically symmetric de Sitter space have been determined and the corresponding global geometries have been constructed. Such configurations can appear at the final stage of the cosmological phase transition, when isolated regions (islands) of the old vacuum remain. The islands of the old vacuum are absorbed by the new vacuum, expand unlimitedly, or form black holes and wormholes depending on the sizes of the islands as well as on the density and velocity of the shells surrounding the islands.
This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project nos. 06-02-16029 and 06-02-16342).
[ { "section_title": "", "section_content": [ [ "The dynamical evolution of a self-gravitating old vacuum island (bubble) appearing between growing and intersecting new-vacuum islands in the process of the cosmological phase transition in the early universe is analyzed. The inner and outer parts of the bubble are simulated by the de Sitter and Schwarzschild metrics, respectively. It is also assumed that the domain wall separating the outer and inner parts of the bubble is a thin shell. Various particular cases of this problem were considered in many works on cosmological phase transitions (see, e. g.., early works (See [Ref.[0,1,2,3] of ArXiv.1208.5249]) ), which can give rise to the formation of black holes and various types of wormholes (See [Ref.[3,4,5,6,7,8] of ArXiv.1208.5249]) . In this work, all possible evolution scenarios of a thin vacuum shell surrounding the spherically symmetric de Sitter space are determined and the corresponding global geometries are constructed. The determination of possible evolution scenarios for vacuum bubbles can serve as a basis for calculations of the probabilities of forming wormholes and primary black holes in detailed models of phase transitions." ], [ "In the thin-shell formalism (See [Ref.[9] of ArXiv.1208.5249]) , the equations of motion of the vacuum bubble can be written in the form (See [Ref.[4,7] of ArXiv.1208.5249]).", "$$4\\pi S\\!=\\!\\frac{\\sigma_{\\rm in}}{\\rho}\\sqrt{\\dot{\\rho}^{2}\\!+\\!1\\!-\\!\\frac{8 \\pi}{3}\\rho^{2}\\varepsilon}-\\frac{\\sigma_{\\rm out}}{\\rho}\\sqrt{\\dot{\\rho}^{2} \\!+\\!1\\!-\\!\\frac{2m}{\\rho}},$$", "where $\\rho(\\tau)$ is the bubble radius, $\\tau$ is the observer time on the shell, $S$ is the surface energy density of the bubble on the shell, $\\varepsilon$ is the energy density inside the shell, $m$ is the total Schwarzschild mass of the shell, and $\\sigma_{\\rm in,out}=\\pm 1$. For subsequent analysis, it is convenient to represent this equation of motion in the form of the equation for the effective energy, $\\dot{\\rho}^{2}+U(\\rho)=0$, where the effective potential has the form", "$$U(\\rho)=1-\\!\\left[\\frac{\\varepsilon(1+e)}{3S}\\right]^{2}\\!\\rho^{2}\\!-\\!\\left( \\!1-\\!\\frac{1}{e}\\right)\\frac{m}{\\rho}-\\frac{m^{2}}{16\\pi^{2}S^{2}\\rho^{4}},$$", "In this case,", "$$\\sigma_{in}=sign\\left[m-\\frac{4\\pi}{3}\\rho^{3}\\varepsilon(1-e) \\right];$$", "$$\\sigma_{out}=sign\\left[m-\\frac{4\\pi}{3}\\rho^{3}\\varepsilon(1+e) \\right].$$", "where $e=6\\pi S^{2}/\\varepsilon$." ], [ "This problem involves four characteristic radii: two gravitational radii", "$$\\rho_{\\rm bh,1}=\\sqrt{\\frac{3}{8\\pi\\varepsilon}}\\quad\\mbox{ }\\quad\\rho_{\\rm bh ,2}=2m,$$", "as well as two radii", "$$\\rho_{1}\\!=\\!\\left[\\frac{3}{4\\pi}\\frac{m}{\\varepsilon(1-e)}\\right]^{1/3}\\quad \\mbox{ }\\quad\\rho_{2}\\!=\\!\\left[\\frac{3}{4\\pi}\\frac{m}{\\varepsilon(1+e)}\\right ]^{1/3},$$", "at which $\\sigma$ changes sign. Note that the radius v exists only for $e<1$, i. e., for $\\varepsilon>6\\pi S^{2}$. The behavior of the solutions of evolution [Equation.0 of ArXiv.1208.5249] depends on the relative values of the four characteristic radii $\\rho_{bh,1}$, $\\rho_{bh,2}$, $\\rho_{1}$ and $\\rho_{1}$, and on the presence or absence of the intersection of the potential with the $U=0$ axis. Let us consider successively all the possible combinations by analogy with the analysis performed in [Ref.[7] of ArXiv.1208.5249] ." ], [ "The condition of the intersection of the potential $U(\\rho)=0$ with the $U=0$ axis is determined by the mass parameter", "$${m}_{0}=\\frac{y^{2}}{\\left\\{\\!\\left[2\\pi S\\!\\left(1\\!+\\!\\frac{1}{e}\\right) \\right]^{2}y^{2}\\!+\\!\\left(1\\!-\\!\\frac{1}{e}\\right)y\\!+\\!(4\\pi S)^{-2}\\right\\} ^{3/2}},$$", "where", "$$y=\\frac{1-\\frac{1}{e}+\\sqrt{(1-\\frac{1}{e})^{2}+8(1+\\frac{1}{e})^{2}}}{\\left[4 \\pi S\\left(1+\\frac{1}{e}\\right)\\right]^{2}}.$$", "The potential intersects the $U=0$ axis only if $m<m_{0}$. It can be easily shown that the second derivative of the potential is always negative. This means that the stable equilibrium position is absent in this problem. The case $m<m_{0}$ is divided into subcases. If $m<m_{1}$, where", "$$m_{1}=\\left(\\frac{3}{32\\pi\\,\\varepsilon}\\right)^{1/2}(1-e)<m_{0},$$", "the four radii satisfy the inequalities $\\rho_{\\rm bh,2}<\\rho_{2}<\\rho_{1}<\\rho_{\\rm bh,1}$ (if $\\rho_{1}$ exists). The radii $\\rho_{1}$ and $\\rho_{2}$ are in the forbidden region and the shell does not intersect them in this case. If $e<1$ (i. e., $\\varepsilon>6\\pi S^{2}$) and the shell moves from infinity with a negative velocity, i.e., contracts, then the shell reaches the stop point, is reflected, and begins to expand infinitely. This solution corresponds to case $C$ from (See [Ref.[7] of ArXiv.1208.5249]) . This solution corresponds to Carter Penrose diagram (a) and embedding diagram (i) in the Fig. 1. According to these diagrams, the shell moves in the space-time region $R_{-}$ of the outer metric and forms a wormhole (See [Ref.[4] of ArXiv.1208.5249]) ." ], [ "Carter Penrose diagram (b) and embedding diagram (j) in the Fig. 1 correspond to the case $e>1$ and motion of the shell from infinity with a negative velocity. In this case, the shell also moves in the region $R_{-}$ of the outer metric and forms a wormhole (See [Ref.[4] of ArXiv.1208.5249]) ." ], [ "If the shell moves with a positive velocity (expands) from the origin, it reaches the stop point, is reflected, and begins to contract. In this case, the shell evolution corresponds to solution β€œ$A$” from (See [Ref.[7] of ArXiv.1208.5249]) and to diagrams (c) and (k) in the Fig. 1. In this case, the shell does not intersect the region $R_{-}$ and, therefore, a black hole, rather than a wormhole, is finally formed (See [Ref.[4] of ArXiv.1208.5249]) ." ], [ "The next case is $m_{1}<m<m_{2}$, where", "$$m_{1}<m_{2}=\\left[\\frac{32\\pi}{3}\\varepsilon(1+e)\\right]^{-1/2}<m_{0}.$$", "In this case, the four radii satisfy the inequalities $\\rho_{\\rm bh,2}<\\rho_{2}<\\rho_{\\rm bh,1}<\\rho_{1}$. The radius $\\rho_{2}$ is in the forbidden region and the shell does not intersect it. In this case, if the shell moves from infinity with a negative velocity, it reaches the stop point, is reflected, and begins to expand. This solution is solution β€œ$D$” from (See [Ref.[7] of ArXiv.1208.5249]) . This solution corresponds to Carter Penrose diagram (b) and embedding diagram (j) in the figure. In this case, the shell intersects the region $R_{-}$ and forms a wormhole (See [Ref.[4] of ArXiv.1208.5249]) . If the shell initially moves with a positive velocity from the origin, this is case β€œ$A$” from (See [Ref.[7] of ArXiv.1208.5249]) and corresponds to diagrams (c) and (k) in the Fig. 1. In this case, the black hole is finally formed." ], [ "Correspondingly, when $m_{2}<m<m_{0}$, the potential intersects the $U=0$ axis. In this case, the four characteristic radii satisfy the inequalities $\\rho_{2}<\\rho_{\\rm bh,2}<\\rho_{\\rm bh,1}<\\rho_{1}$. The case where the shell moves from infinity with a negative velocity reduces to the case considered above. This is case β€œ$D$” from (See [Ref.[7] of ArXiv.1208.5249]) . If the shell moves with a positive velocity from the origin, this is case β€œ$B$” from (See [Ref.[7] of ArXiv.1208.5249]) . This case corresponds to diagrams (d) and (j). In this case, the shell intersects the region $R_{-}$ of the outer metric and forms a wormhole (See [Ref.[4] of ArXiv.1208.5249]) ." ], [ "The final possible case is $m>m_{0}$. In this case, the potential does not intersect the $U=0$ axis and there is no reflection point in the solution. This is case β€œ$E$” from (See [Ref.[7] of ArXiv.1208.5249]) . We consider this case in more detail, because it was not analyzed in [Ref.[7] of ArXiv.1208.5249] . In this case, two subcases are possible. If $m_{0}<m<m_{3}$, where $m_{3}=(32\\pi\\varepsilon/3)^{-1/2}$, the four characteristic radii satisfy the inequalities $\\rho_{2}<\\rho_{\\rm bh,2}<\\rho_{\\rm bh,1}<\\rho_{1}$. If the shell is initially near the origin and its velocity is positive, it expands infinitely as follows from diagrams (e) and (j). In this case, the shell intersects the region $R_{-}$ of the outer metric and, therefore, forms a wormhole (See [Ref.[4] of ArXiv.1208.5249]) . If the shell is initially at infinity and its velocity is negative, nothing prevents it from contracting. This case corresponds to diagrams (f) and (j). It is seen that the shell finally intersects the region $R_{-}$ of the outer metric and forms a wormhole (See [Ref.[4] of ArXiv.1208.5249]) ." ], [ "The next possible case depends on the relation between $\\varepsilon$ and $6\\pi S^{2}$. If$\\varepsilon<3\\pi S^{2}(1+\\sqrt{5})$, then $m_{4}<m_{5}$, where", "$$m_{4}\\!=\\!\\!\\left(\\!\\frac{32\\pi\\varepsilon}{3}\\!\\right)^{\\!-1/2}\\!\\!\\!(1+e),\\; m_{5}\\!=\\!\\!\\left[\\frac{32\\pi\\varepsilon}{3}(1-e)\\right]^{-1/2}\\!\\!.$$", "When $m_{3}<m<m_{4}$, the four characteristic radii satisfy the inequalities $\\rho_{2}<\\rho_{\\rm bh,1}<\\rho_{\\rm bh,2}<\\rho_{1}$. This case corresponds to Carter Penrose diagram (g) for an expanding shell and diagram (h) for a contracting shell. Corresponding embedding diagram (l) is shown only conditionally, because the existence regions of the de Sitter and Schwarzschild embedding diagrams in this case do not overlap. Correspondingly, when $m_{4}<m<m_{5}$, the four characteristic radii satisfy the inequalities $\\rho_{\\rm bh,1}<\\rho_{2}<\\rho_{\\rm bh,2}<\\rho_{1}$. In this case, the Carter-Penrose diagram remains unchanged. In the final case $m>m_{5}$, the four characteristic radii satisfy the inequalities $\\rho_{\\rm bh,1}<\\rho_{2}<\\rho_{1}<\\rho_{\\rm bh,2}$ and the corresponding diagrams also remain unchanged. If $\\varepsilon>3\\pi S^{2}(1+\\sqrt{5})$, then $m_{4}>m_{5}$ and, therefore, $\\rho_{\\rm bh,2}$ and $\\rho_{1}$, rather than $\\rho_{2}$ and $\\rho_{\\rm bh,1}$, first change their places. The qualitative pattern of the dynamical evolution does not change in this case." ], [ "In conclusion, we note that the total shell mass m that makes it possible to determine and systematize all possible global geometries of the evolving shell around the de Sitter space is determined by the energy density $\\varepsilon$ inside the shell and the surface energy density $S$ on the shell, as well as depends implicitly on the initial radius and velocity of the shell at the instant of bubble formation." ] ] } ]
[ { "section_title": "", "section_content": [ [ "The dynamical evolution of a self-gravitating old vacuum island (bubble) appearing between growing and intersecting new-vacuum islands in the process of the cosmological phase transition in the early universe is analyzed. The inner and outer parts of the bubble are simulated by the de Sitter and Schwarzschild metrics, respectively. It is also assumed that the domain wall separating the outer and inner parts of the bubble is a thin shell. Various particular cases of this problem were considered in many works on cosmological phase transitions (see, e. g.., early works (See [Ref.[0,1,2,3] of ArXiv.1208.5249]) ), which can give rise to the formation of black holes and various types of wormholes (See [Ref.[3,4,5,6,7,8] of ArXiv.1208.5249]) . In this work, all possible evolution scenarios of a thin vacuum shell surrounding the spherically symmetric de Sitter space are determined and the corresponding global geometries are constructed. The determination of possible evolution scenarios for vacuum bubbles can serve as a basis for calculations of the probabilities of forming wormholes and primary black holes in detailed models of phase transitions." ], [ "In the thin-shell formalism (See [Ref.[9] of ArXiv.1208.5249]) , the equations of motion of the vacuum bubble can be written in the form (See [Ref.[4,7] of ArXiv.1208.5249]).", "$$4\\pi S\\!=\\!\\frac{\\sigma_{\\rm in}}{\\rho}\\sqrt{\\dot{\\rho}^{2}\\!+\\!1\\!-\\!\\frac{8 \\pi}{3}\\rho^{2}\\varepsilon}-\\frac{\\sigma_{\\rm out}}{\\rho}\\sqrt{\\dot{\\rho}^{2} \\!+\\!1\\!-\\!\\frac{2m}{\\rho}},$$", "where $\\rho(\\tau)$ is the bubble radius, $\\tau$ is the observer time on the shell, $S$ is the surface energy density of the bubble on the shell, $\\varepsilon$ is the energy density inside the shell, $m$ is the total Schwarzschild mass of the shell, and $\\sigma_{\\rm in,out}=\\pm 1$. For subsequent analysis, it is convenient to represent this equation of motion in the form of the equation for the effective energy, $\\dot{\\rho}^{2}+U(\\rho)=0$, where the effective potential has the form", "$$U(\\rho)=1-\\!\\left[\\frac{\\varepsilon(1+e)}{3S}\\right]^{2}\\!\\rho^{2}\\!-\\!\\left( \\!1-\\!\\frac{1}{e}\\right)\\frac{m}{\\rho}-\\frac{m^{2}}{16\\pi^{2}S^{2}\\rho^{4}},$$", "In this case,", "$$\\sigma_{in}=sign\\left[m-\\frac{4\\pi}{3}\\rho^{3}\\varepsilon(1-e) \\right];$$", "$$\\sigma_{out}=sign\\left[m-\\frac{4\\pi}{3}\\rho^{3}\\varepsilon(1+e) \\right].$$", "where $e=6\\pi S^{2}/\\varepsilon$." ], [ "This problem involves four characteristic radii: two gravitational radii", "$$\\rho_{\\rm bh,1}=\\sqrt{\\frac{3}{8\\pi\\varepsilon}}\\quad\\mbox{ }\\quad\\rho_{\\rm bh ,2}=2m,$$", "as well as two radii", "$$\\rho_{1}\\!=\\!\\left[\\frac{3}{4\\pi}\\frac{m}{\\varepsilon(1-e)}\\right]^{1/3}\\quad \\mbox{ }\\quad\\rho_{2}\\!=\\!\\left[\\frac{3}{4\\pi}\\frac{m}{\\varepsilon(1+e)}\\right ]^{1/3},$$", "at which $\\sigma$ changes sign. Note that the radius v exists only for $e<1$, i. e., for $\\varepsilon>6\\pi S^{2}$. The behavior of the solutions of evolution [Equation.0 of ArXiv.1208.5249] depends on the relative values of the four characteristic radii $\\rho_{bh,1}$, $\\rho_{bh,2}$, $\\rho_{1}$ and $\\rho_{1}$, and on the presence or absence of the intersection of the potential with the $U=0$ axis. Let us consider successively all the possible combinations by analogy with the analysis performed in [Ref.[7] of ArXiv.1208.5249] ." ], [ "The condition of the intersection of the potential $U(\\rho)=0$ with the $U=0$ axis is determined by the mass parameter", "$${m}_{0}=\\frac{y^{2}}{\\left\\{\\!\\left[2\\pi S\\!\\left(1\\!+\\!\\frac{1}{e}\\right) \\right]^{2}y^{2}\\!+\\!\\left(1\\!-\\!\\frac{1}{e}\\right)y\\!+\\!(4\\pi S)^{-2}\\right\\} ^{3/2}},$$", "where", "$$y=\\frac{1-\\frac{1}{e}+\\sqrt{(1-\\frac{1}{e})^{2}+8(1+\\frac{1}{e})^{2}}}{\\left[4 \\pi S\\left(1+\\frac{1}{e}\\right)\\right]^{2}}.$$", "The potential intersects the $U=0$ axis only if $m<m_{0}$. It can be easily shown that the second derivative of the potential is always negative. This means that the stable equilibrium position is absent in this problem. The case $m<m_{0}$ is divided into subcases. If $m<m_{1}$, where", "$$m_{1}=\\left(\\frac{3}{32\\pi\\,\\varepsilon}\\right)^{1/2}(1-e)<m_{0},$$", "the four radii satisfy the inequalities $\\rho_{\\rm bh,2}<\\rho_{2}<\\rho_{1}<\\rho_{\\rm bh,1}$ (if $\\rho_{1}$ exists). The radii $\\rho_{1}$ and $\\rho_{2}$ are in the forbidden region and the shell does not intersect them in this case. If $e<1$ (i. e., $\\varepsilon>6\\pi S^{2}$) and the shell moves from infinity with a negative velocity, i.e., contracts, then the shell reaches the stop point, is reflected, and begins to expand infinitely. This solution corresponds to case $C$ from (See [Ref.[7] of ArXiv.1208.5249]) . This solution corresponds to Carter Penrose diagram (a) and embedding diagram (i) in the Fig. 1. According to these diagrams, the shell moves in the space-time region $R_{-}$ of the outer metric and forms a wormhole (See [Ref.[4] of ArXiv.1208.5249]) ." ], [ "Carter Penrose diagram (b) and embedding diagram (j) in the Fig. 1 correspond to the case $e>1$ and motion of the shell from infinity with a negative velocity. In this case, the shell also moves in the region $R_{-}$ of the outer metric and forms a wormhole (See [Ref.[4] of ArXiv.1208.5249]) ." ], [ "If the shell moves with a positive velocity (expands) from the origin, it reaches the stop point, is reflected, and begins to contract. In this case, the shell evolution corresponds to solution β€œ$A$” from (See [Ref.[7] of ArXiv.1208.5249]) and to diagrams (c) and (k) in the Fig. 1. In this case, the shell does not intersect the region $R_{-}$ and, therefore, a black hole, rather than a wormhole, is finally formed (See [Ref.[4] of ArXiv.1208.5249]) ." ], [ "The next case is $m_{1}<m<m_{2}$, where", "$$m_{1}<m_{2}=\\left[\\frac{32\\pi}{3}\\varepsilon(1+e)\\right]^{-1/2}<m_{0}.$$", "In this case, the four radii satisfy the inequalities $\\rho_{\\rm bh,2}<\\rho_{2}<\\rho_{\\rm bh,1}<\\rho_{1}$. The radius $\\rho_{2}$ is in the forbidden region and the shell does not intersect it. In this case, if the shell moves from infinity with a negative velocity, it reaches the stop point, is reflected, and begins to expand. This solution is solution β€œ$D$” from (See [Ref.[7] of ArXiv.1208.5249]) . This solution corresponds to Carter Penrose diagram (b) and embedding diagram (j) in the figure. In this case, the shell intersects the region $R_{-}$ and forms a wormhole (See [Ref.[4] of ArXiv.1208.5249]) . If the shell initially moves with a positive velocity from the origin, this is case β€œ$A$” from (See [Ref.[7] of ArXiv.1208.5249]) and corresponds to diagrams (c) and (k) in the Fig. 1. In this case, the black hole is finally formed." ], [ "Correspondingly, when $m_{2}<m<m_{0}$, the potential intersects the $U=0$ axis. In this case, the four characteristic radii satisfy the inequalities $\\rho_{2}<\\rho_{\\rm bh,2}<\\rho_{\\rm bh,1}<\\rho_{1}$. The case where the shell moves from infinity with a negative velocity reduces to the case considered above. This is case β€œ$D$” from (See [Ref.[7] of ArXiv.1208.5249]) . If the shell moves with a positive velocity from the origin, this is case β€œ$B$” from (See [Ref.[7] of ArXiv.1208.5249]) . This case corresponds to diagrams (d) and (j). In this case, the shell intersects the region $R_{-}$ of the outer metric and forms a wormhole (See [Ref.[4] of ArXiv.1208.5249]) ." ], [ "The final possible case is $m>m_{0}$. In this case, the potential does not intersect the $U=0$ axis and there is no reflection point in the solution. This is case β€œ$E$” from (See [Ref.[7] of ArXiv.1208.5249]) . We consider this case in more detail, because it was not analyzed in [Ref.[7] of ArXiv.1208.5249] . In this case, two subcases are possible. If $m_{0}<m<m_{3}$, where $m_{3}=(32\\pi\\varepsilon/3)^{-1/2}$, the four characteristic radii satisfy the inequalities $\\rho_{2}<\\rho_{\\rm bh,2}<\\rho_{\\rm bh,1}<\\rho_{1}$. If the shell is initially near the origin and its velocity is positive, it expands infinitely as follows from diagrams (e) and (j). In this case, the shell intersects the region $R_{-}$ of the outer metric and, therefore, forms a wormhole (See [Ref.[4] of ArXiv.1208.5249]) . If the shell is initially at infinity and its velocity is negative, nothing prevents it from contracting. This case corresponds to diagrams (f) and (j). It is seen that the shell finally intersects the region $R_{-}$ of the outer metric and forms a wormhole (See [Ref.[4] of ArXiv.1208.5249]) ." ], [ "The next possible case depends on the relation between $\\varepsilon$ and $6\\pi S^{2}$. If$\\varepsilon<3\\pi S^{2}(1+\\sqrt{5})$, then $m_{4}<m_{5}$, where", "$$m_{4}\\!=\\!\\!\\left(\\!\\frac{32\\pi\\varepsilon}{3}\\!\\right)^{\\!-1/2}\\!\\!\\!(1+e),\\; m_{5}\\!=\\!\\!\\left[\\frac{32\\pi\\varepsilon}{3}(1-e)\\right]^{-1/2}\\!\\!.$$", "When $m_{3}<m<m_{4}$, the four characteristic radii satisfy the inequalities $\\rho_{2}<\\rho_{\\rm bh,1}<\\rho_{\\rm bh,2}<\\rho_{1}$. This case corresponds to Carter Penrose diagram (g) for an expanding shell and diagram (h) for a contracting shell. Corresponding embedding diagram (l) is shown only conditionally, because the existence regions of the de Sitter and Schwarzschild embedding diagrams in this case do not overlap. Correspondingly, when $m_{4}<m<m_{5}$, the four characteristic radii satisfy the inequalities $\\rho_{\\rm bh,1}<\\rho_{2}<\\rho_{\\rm bh,2}<\\rho_{1}$. In this case, the Carter-Penrose diagram remains unchanged. In the final case $m>m_{5}$, the four characteristic radii satisfy the inequalities $\\rho_{\\rm bh,1}<\\rho_{2}<\\rho_{1}<\\rho_{\\rm bh,2}$ and the corresponding diagrams also remain unchanged. If $\\varepsilon>3\\pi S^{2}(1+\\sqrt{5})$, then $m_{4}>m_{5}$ and, therefore, $\\rho_{\\rm bh,2}$ and $\\rho_{1}$, rather than $\\rho_{2}$ and $\\rho_{\\rm bh,1}$, first change their places. The qualitative pattern of the dynamical evolution does not change in this case." ], [ "In conclusion, we note that the total shell mass m that makes it possible to determine and systematize all possible global geometries of the evolving shell around the de Sitter space is determined by the energy density $\\varepsilon$ inside the shell and the surface energy density $S$ on the shell, as well as depends implicitly on the initial radius and velocity of the shell at the instant of bubble formation." ] ] } ]
{ "figures_metadata": { "LABEL:fig1": "Figure 1 Carter Penrose diagrams and embedding diagrams describing all possible types of the global symmetry around the de Sitter space." }, "tables_metadata": {}, "bibitem_ref_metadata": { "Kirznits": "D. A. Kirzhnits, Pis ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 15, 745 (1972) [JETP Lett. 15, 529 (1972)]; D. A. Kirzhnits and A. D. Linde, Phys. Lett. B 42B, 471 (1972).", "KobzOkunVoloshin": "I. Yu. Kobzarev, L. B. Okun, and M. B. Voloshin, Yad.Fiz.. 20 , 1229 (1974) [Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 20, 644 (1975)].", "ColemanLuccia": "S. Coleman, F. D. Luccia, Phys. Rev. D15 , 2929 (1977); ibid. D21 , 3305 (1980).", "Sato": "K. Sato, M. Sasaki, H. Kodama, and K. Maeda, Prog. Theor. Phys. 65 , 1443 (1981).", "BerKuzTkach": "V. A. Berezin, V. A. Kuzmin, and I. I. Tkachev, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 86 , 785 (1984); ibid. Pis ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 41 , 446 (1985); ibid. Phys. Rev. D36 , 2919 (1987); ibid. Phys. Lett. B120 , 91 (1983).", "IpserSikivie": "J. Ipser, P. Sikivie, Phys. Rev. D30 , 712 (1984).", "Aurilia": "A. Aurilia, G. Denardo, F. Legovivni, E. Spallucci, Phys. Lett. B147 , 258 (1984); Nucl. Phys. B252 , 523 (1985).", "BlGuenGuth": "S. K. Blau, E. I. Guendelman, A. H. Guth, Phys. Rev. D35 , 1747 (1987).", "FrolMarMuk": "V. P. Frolov, M. A. Markov, V. F. Mukhanov, Phys. Rev. D41 , 383 (1990).", "Israel": "W. Israel, Nuovo Cimento. 44B , 1 (1966); ibid. 48B , 463 (1967)." } }
ArXiv.1208.5249
{ "LABEL:fig1": [ [ "Figure", "0" ] ], "Kirznits": [ [ "Reference", "0" ] ], "KobzOkunVoloshin": [ [ "Reference", "1" ] ], "ColemanLuccia": [ [ "Reference", "2" ] ], "Sato": [ [ "Reference", "3" ] ], "BerKuzTkach": [ [ "Reference", "4" ] ], "IpserSikivie": [ [ "Reference", "5" ] ], "Aurilia": [ [ "Reference", "6" ] ], "BlGuenGuth": [ [ "Reference", "7" ] ], "FrolMarMuk": [ [ "Reference", "8" ] ], "Israel": [ [ "Reference", "9" ] ], "LABEL:evol": [ [ "Equation", "0" ] ] }
{}

The Uparxive Dataset

The uparxive aims to provide a llm-friendly dataest for the whole arxiv .tex source. A similiar dataset is the unarxive, while the uparxvie use a different tool chain.

The Uparxive dataset is stored in .json format, which can be seamlessly converted into Markdown .md format.

See github repo for a simple converter.

Format Rules

The Uparxive dataset adheres to the following rules:

  • Tables and Figures: Elements enclosed within \begin{table} \end{table} and \begin{figure} \end{figure} tags are extracted and appended at the end of the document for clarity and organization.

  • Citations and References: Citations (\cite{}) and references (\ref{}) are converted to more explicit forms to improve readability. Examples include:

    • Direct mentions: (See [Ref. [1,2] of ArXiv.1512.03385])
    • Contextual references: in [Ref. [1,2] of ArXiv.1512.03385]
    • Equation/Section/Figures/Tables references: in [Equation [1] of ArXiv.1512.03385], depending on the usage context.
  • Mathematical Notations:

    • In-line Math: Single dollar signs $ are used for in-line mathematical expressions, e.g., $\alpha$.
    • Block Math: Double dollar signs $$ denote block mathematical expressions, e.g., $$\mathbf{y}=\mathcal{F}(\mathbf{x},\{W_{i}\})+\mathbf{x}.$$

See 1512.03385.json and 1512.03385.md as example

Dataset Sources [optional]

To construct the complete Uparxive dataset from scratch, please refer to the GitHub repo.

Note: The "full" version of uparxive was generated from all of arXiv.org including non-permissively licensed papers. Make sure that your use of the data is compliant with the paper's licensing terms. (For information on papers' licenses use arXiv's bulk metadata access).

Note: paper under CC BY-NC-ND license are not included in the dataset. [More Information Needed]

Who are the source data producers?

  • arXiv Bulk Data Access: Access and download bulk data directly from arXiv using the AWS S3 request-payer dataset. Detailed instructions and access points can be found here: arXiv Bulk Data Access.
  • arXiv API: For more specific data needs or metadata, use the arXiv API. Documentation and usage guidelines are available here: arXiv API.
    • Important Note: When crawling arXiv source files, ensure to use export.arxiv.org instead of the official arxiv.org domain to avoid overloading the main site.

[More Information Needed]

Statistic

This dataset part will need 156G dick space for 1.7M papers.

Up to April 2024, there are around 2,450,893 papers in the arxiv source, and the uparxive dataset has covered 1,700,000 papers. Those missing parts are mainly due to the lack of the .tex source or the failure of the conversion process. uparxive_analysis

Downloads last month
0
Edit dataset card