Police	O
had	O
previously	O
gone	O
to	O
home	O
where	O
Ohio	O
patrol	O
officers	O
were	O
killed	O

CLEVELAND	O
—	O
Police	O
invstigating	O
domestic	O
disputes	O
had	O
previously	O
gone	O
to	O
the	O
home	O
where	O
a	O
man	O
fatally	O
shot	O
two	O
police	O
officers	O
over	O
the	O
weekend	O
,	O
but	O
no	O
arrests	O
were	O
ever	O
made	O
,	O
police	O
reports	O
from	O
the	O
Columbus	O
suburb	O
of	O
Westerville	O
show	O
.	O

Westerville	O
Officers	O
Eric	O
Joering	O
,	O
39	O
,	O
and	O
Anthony	O
Morelli	O
,	O
54	O
,	O
were	O
killed	O
shortly	O
after	O
noon	O
Saturday	O
in	O
this	O
normally	O
quiet	O
suburb	O
while	O
responding	O
to	O
a	O
911	O
hang	O
-	O
up	O
call	O
.	O

The	O
suspect	O
,	O
30-year	O
-	O
old	O
Quentin	O
Smith	O
,	O
was	O
shot	O
and	O
wounded	O
by	O
the	O
officers	O
and	O
taken	O
to	O
Ohio	O
State	O
University	O
Wexner	O
Medical	O
Center	O
in	O
critical	O
condition	O
Saturday	O
.	O

Advertisement	O

A	O
series	O
of	O
911	O
calls	O
released	O
by	O
the	O
city	O
of	O
Westerville	O
provide	O
some	O
details	O
about	O
what	O
happened	O
Saturday	O
at	O
a	O
complex	O
of	O
town	O
houses	O
.	O

Smith	O
lived	O
there	O
with	O
his	O
wife	O
,	O
Candace	O
,	O
and	O
a	O
young	O
daughter	O
.	O

Get	O
Ground	O
Game	O
in	O
your	O
inbox	O
:	O
Daily	O
updates	O
and	O
analysis	O
on	O
national	O
politics	O
from	O
James	O
Pindell	O
.	O

Sign	O
Up	O
Thank	O
you	O
for	O
signing	O
up	O
!	O

Sign	O
up	O
for	O
more	O
newsletters	O
here	O

Westerville	O
Police	O
Chief	O
Joe	O
Morbitzer	O
said	O
at	O
a	O
news	O
conference	O
Saturday	O
that	O
Joering	O
and	O
Morelli	O
were	O
shot	O
immediately	O
upon	O
entering	O
.	O

After	O
the	O
initial	O
hang	O
-	O
up	O
call	O
at	O
noon	O
,	O
a	O
dispatcher	O
called	O
the	O
number	O
back	O
and	O
reached	O
a	O
woman	O
who	O
was	O
crying	O
and	O
could	O
be	O
heard	O
saying	O
,	O
‘	O
‘	O
wo	O
n’t	O
let	O
me	O
in	O
.	O
’	O
’	O

Officers	O
were	O
then	O
sent	O
to	O
the	O
home	O
.	O

At	O
12:12	O
p.m.	O
,	O
an	O
officer	O
tells	O
a	O
dispatcher	O
that	O
it	O
’s	O
‘	O
‘	O
all	O
quiet	O
right	O
now	O
,	O
’	O
’	O
followed	O
by	O
a	O
door	O
knock	O
.	O

At	O
12:13	O
p.m.	O
,	O
after	O
a	O
dispatcher	O
confirmed	O
contact	O
has	O
been	O
made	O
,	O
a	O
man	O
’s	O
voice	O
could	O
be	O
heard	O
yelling	O
,	O
‘	O
‘	O
We	O
have	O
shots	O
fired	O
.	O
’	O
’	O

Four	O
minutes	O
later	O
,	O
someone	O
,	O
presumably	O
a	O
police	O
officer	O
,	O
told	O
a	O
dispatcher	O
:	O
‘	O
‘	O
We	O
have	O
two	O
officers	O
down	O
.	O

Child	O
on	O
couch	O
,	O
one	O
at	O
gunpoint	O
.	O
’	O
’	O

Advertisement	O

ASSOCIATED	O
PRESS	O

America	O
's	O
Immigration	O
Voice	O
.	O

Earlier	O
,	O
I	O
blogged	O
that	O
the	O
police	O
had	O
released	O
the	O
name	O
of	O
the	O
suspect	O
in	O
the	O
murder	O
of	O
two	O
white	O
Westerville	O
,	O
OH	O
cops	O
(	O
Quentin	O
Lamar	O
Smith	O
)	O
but	O
no	O
picture	O
had	O
appeared	O
.	O

I	O
found	O
the	O
picture	O
at	O
right	O
on	O
a	O
Mugshots	O
site	O
,	O
attributed	O
to	O
a	O
guy	O
with	O
the	O
same	O
name	O
,	O
in	O
the	O
same	O
town	O
.	O

(	O
Most	O
people	O
named	O
Quentin	O
Lamar	O
Smith	O
are	O
black	O
,	O
by	O
the	O
way	O
.	O
)	O

Police	O
charge	O
suspect	O
in	O
death	O
of	O
two	O
Westerville	O
Police	O
officers	O
Quentin	O
Lamar	O
Smith	O
was	O
charged	O
with	O
two	O
counts	O
of	O
aggravated	O
murder	O
on	O
Sunday	O
By	O
WCMH	O
Staff	O
and	O
The	O
Associated	O
Press	O
Published	O
:	O
February	O
11	O
,	O
2018	O
,	O
4:45	O
pm	O
Updated	O
:	O
February	O
11	O
,	O
2018	O
,	O
6:02	O
pm	O
WESTERVILLE	O
,	O
OH	O
(	O
WCMH	O
/	O
AP	O
)	O
—	O
The	O
Westerville	O
Division	O
of	O
Police	O
has	O
identified	O
the	O
suspect	O
in	O
the	O
shooting	O
death	O
of	O
two	O
police	O
officers	O
as	O
30-year	O
-	O
old	O
Quentin	O
Lamar	O
Smith	O
.	O

Westerville	O
Police	O
Chief	O
Joe	O
Morbitzer	O
said	O
officer	O
Eric	O
Joering	O
,	O
39	O
,	O
died	O
at	O
the	O
scene	O
and	O
his	O
colleague	O
,	O
Anthony	O
Morelli	O
,	O
54	O
,	O
died	O
at	O
a	O
local	O
hospital	O
.	O

Smith	O
was	O
charged	O
with	O
two	O
counts	O
of	O
aggravated	O
murder	O
on	O
Sunday	O
.	O

Morbitzer	O
said	O
the	O
officers	O
were	O
responding	O
to	O
a	O
“	O
potential	O
domestic	O
situation	O
.	O
”	O
A	O
neighbor	O
who	O
heard	O
the	O
gunfire	O
said	O
it	O
happened	O
at	O
a	O
home	O
where	O
the	O
occupants	O
were	O
“	O
always	O
arguing	O
and	O
fighting	O
.	O
”	O
“	O
The	O
officers	O
gave	O
their	O
lives	O
in	O
defense	O
of	O
others	O
,	O
”	O
Morbitzer	O
said	O
during	O
a	O
news	O
conference	O
,	O
struggling	O
to	O
keep	O
his	O
emotions	O
in	O
check	O
.	O

He	O
called	O
them	O
“	O
true	B-PROP
American	I-PROP
heroes	I-PROP
.	O
”	O
The	O
Columbus	O
Police	O
Department	O
is	O
investigating	O
the	O
shootings	O
.	O

Police	O
released	O
incident	O
reports	O
showing	O
officers	O
had	O
been	O
to	O
Smith	O
’s	O
home	O
or	O
had	O
dealings	O
with	O
him	O
several	O
times	O
since	O
2017	O
,	O
some	O
for	O
alleged	O
domestic	O
violence	O
involving	O
a	O
woman	O
identified	O
in	O
the	O
reports	O
as	O
his	O
wife	O
,	O
Candace	O
Smith	O
.	O

Authorities	O
said	O
he	O
was	O
wounded	O
and	O
was	O
treated	O
at	O
a	O
hospital	O
.	O

In	O
a	O
Nov.	O
29	O
incident	O
,	O
Candace	O
Smith	O
,	O
33	O
,	O
went	O
to	O
a	O
police	O
station	O
and	O
asked	O
about	O
protection	O
orders	O
because	O
she	O
said	O
she	O
and	O
her	O
husband	O
were	O
n’t	O
getting	O
along	O
and	O
she	O
discovered	O
she	O
had	O
a	O
sexually	O
transmitted	O
disease	O
.	O

She	O
also	O
told	O
police	O
that	O
when	O
she	O
“	O
threatens	O
to	O
leave	O
Quentin	O
,	O
he	O
tells	O
her	O
that	O
he	B-PROP
would	I-PROP
kill	I-PROP
her	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
their	I-PROP
daughter	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
himself	I-PROP
,	O
”	O
the	O
report	O
said	O
.	O

Candace	O
Smith	O
told	O
police	O
her	O
husband	O
“	O
has	O
a	O
gun	O
that	O
he	O
carries	O
all	O
of	O
the	O
time	O
,	O
and	O
if	O
it	O
is	O
n’t	O
on	O
him	O
,	O
it	O
is	O
close	O
by	O
.	O
”	O
Police	O
were	O
called	O
to	O
the	O
home	O
later	O
that	O
night	O
to	O
investigate	O
a	O
report	O
of	O
domestic	O
violence	O
.	O

[	O
More	O
]	O

Anyhow	O
,	O
they	O
have	O
now	O
released	O
a	O
different	O
photo	O
(	O
above)and	O
it	O
is	O
the	O
same	O
guy	O
,	O
and	O
he	O
is	O
black	O
.	O

This	O
goes	O
in	O
our	O
"	O
Black	O
Murders	O
Of	O
White	B-PROP
Cops	O
"	O
category	O
,	O
and	O
also	O
in	O
our	O
"	O
Not	O
Reporting	O
Race	O
"	O
category	O
,	O
since	O
except	O
for	O
the	O
photograph	O
,	O
there	O
's	O
no	O
mention	O
of	O
the	O
race	O
issue	O
.	O
Officers	O
Anthony	O
Morelli	O
and	O
Eric	O
Joering	O
are	O
dead	O
,	O
and	O
Smith	O
is	O
alive	O
in	O
hospital	O
.	O

If	O
these	O
two	O
men	O
had	O
survived	O
,	O
and	O
Quentin	O
Lamar	O
Smith	O
had	O
died	O
,	O
you	O
'd	O
be	O
hearing	O
a	O
lot	O
about	O
the	O
race	O
issue	O
.	O

Man	O
arrested	O
for	O
allegedly	O
buying	O
gun	O
used	O
in	O
killing	O
of	O
Ohio	O
officers	O
at	O
scene	O
of	O
911	O
hang	O
-	O
up	O
call	O

A	O
second	O
man	O
has	O
been	O
arrested	O
in	O
the	O
slaying	O
of	O
two	O
Ohio	O
police	O
officers	O
for	O
allegedly	O
buying	O
the	O
gun	O
using	O
in	O
the	O
killing	O
,	O
federal	O
authorities	O
said	O
.	O

Gerald	O
Lawson	O
III	O
,	O
30	O
,	O
is	O
accused	O
of	O
acting	O
as	O
a	O
straw	O
purchaser	O
for	O
the	O
suspect	O
,	O
30-year	O
-	O
old	O
Quentin	O
Lamar	O
Smith	O
,	O
who	O
is	O
a	O
convicted	O
felon	O
and	O
not	O
permitted	O
to	O
buy	O
a	O
firearm	O
,	O
the	O
Justice	O
Department	O
for	O
the	O
Southern	O
District	O
of	O
Ohio	O
said	O
.	O

The	O
Saturday	O
shooting	O
took	O
place	O
when	O
Westerville	O
police	O
officers	O
Eric	O
Joering	O
and	O
Anthony	O
Morelli	O
responded	O
to	O
a	O
911	O
hang	O
-	O
up	O
Saturday	O
and	O
were	O
"	O
immediately	O
met	O
with	O
gunfire	O
"	O
and	O
exchanged	O
fire	O
with	O
Smith	O
,	O
police	O
said	O
.	O

Andrew	O
Welsh	O
-	O
Huggins	O
/	O
AP	O

Tom	O
Dodge	O
/	O
The	O
Columbus	O
Dispatch	O
via	O
AP	O

Smith	O
,	O
who	O
allegedly	O
had	O
a	O
Glock	O
semi	O
-	O
automatic	O
handgun	O
,	O
was	O
also	O
injured	O
in	O
the	O
shooting	O
and	O
is	O
in	O
the	O
hospital	O
,	O
authorities	O
said	O
.	O

He	O
is	O
expected	O
to	O
survive	O
,	O
police	O
said	O
.	O

The	O
Columbus	O
Division	O
of	O
Police	O
,	O
which	O
is	O
leading	O
the	O
investigation	O
,	O
has	O
filed	O
two	O
counts	O
of	O
aggravated	O
murder	O
charges	O
,	O
according	O
to	O
the	O
city	O
of	O
Westerville	O
.	O

He	O
has	O
not	O
yet	O
entered	O
a	O
plea	O
.	O

Lawson	O
and	O
Smith	O
"	O
have	O
a	O
long	O
history	O
of	O
friendship	O
,	O
"	O
according	O
to	O
the	O
Justice	O
Department	O
.	O

The	O
Justice	O
Department	O
said	O
a	O
witness	O
told	O
investigators	O
Smith	O
gave	O
Lawson	O
money	O
for	O
the	O
firearm	O
and	O
an	O
extra	O
$	O
100	O
as	O
compensation	O
.	O

Lawson	O
was	O
arrested	O
today	O
and	O
charged	O
with	O
aiding	O
and	O
abetting	O
the	O
possession	O
of	O
a	O
firearm	O
by	O
a	O
prohibited	O
person	O
,	O
the	O
Justice	O
Department	O
said	O
.	O

He	O
is	O
scheduled	O
to	O
appear	O
before	O
a	O
judge	O
this	O
afternoon	O
.	O

Tom	O
Dodge	O
/	O
The	O
Columbus	O
Dispatch	O
via	O
AP	O

Tom	O
Dodge	O
/	O
The	O
Columbus	O
Dispatch	O
via	O
AP	O

The	O
officers	O
were	O
"	O
true	B-PROP
American	I-PROP
heroes	I-PROP
"	O
and	O
"	O
were	O
two	O
of	O
the	O
best	O
we	O
had	O
,	O
"	O
Westerville	O
Police	O
Chief	O
Joe	O
Morbitzer	O
said	O
this	O
weekend	O
.	O

“	O
This	B-PROP
was	I-PROP
their	I-PROP
calling	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
did	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
right	I-PROP
,	O
"	O
Morbitzer	O
said	O
.	O

Sam	O
Greene	O
/	O
Cincinnati	O
Enquirer	O
via	O
USA	O
TODAY	O

Sam	O
Greene	O
/	O
Cincinnati	O
Enquirer	O
via	O
USA	O
TODAY	O

Ohio	O
Gov.	O

John	O
Kasich	O
today	O
ordered	O
all	O
flags	O
be	O
flown	O
at	O
half	O
-	O
staff	O
in	O
the	O
state	O
in	O
honor	O
of	O
two	O
police	O
officers	O
,	O
who	O
were	O
gunned	O
down	O
in	O
the	O
governor	O
's	O
hometown	O
.	O

A	O
procession	O
was	O
held	O
this	O
morning	O
for	O
the	O
fallen	O
officers	O
,	O
leading	O
from	O
the	O
coroner	O
's	O
office	O
to	O
the	O
funeral	O
homes	O
.	O

Dozens	O
of	O
officers	O
outside	O
the	O
coroners	O
office	O
honoring	O
the	O
fallen	O
Westerville	O
officers	O
.	O

We	O
’ll	O
share	O
the	O
escort	O
live	O
in	O
a	O
few	O
minutes	O
on	O
CPD	O
Facebook	O
.	O

@tellwesterville	O
@WestervillePD	O
pic.twitter.com/OVGUvozPDZ	O
—	O
Columbus	O
Ohio	O
Police	O
(	O
@ColumbusPolice	O
)	O
February	O
12	O
,	O
2018	O

WBNS	O

Morelli	O
,	O
54	O
,	O
was	O
a	O
29-year	O
veteran	O
of	O
the	O
department	O
.	O

Westerville	O
Police	O
Department	O

Joering	O
,	O
39	O
,	O
was	O
a	O
16-year	O
veteran	O
of	O
the	O
department	O
.	O

Westerville	O
Police	O
Department	O

Morelli	O
was	O
married	O
with	O
two	O
children	O
and	O
Joering	O
was	O
married	O
with	O
four	O
daughters	O
,	O
according	O
to	O
The	O
New	O
York	O
Times	O
.	O

Morelli	O
's	O
and	O
Joering	O
's	O
families	O
released	O
a	O
statement	O
saying	O
how	O
"	O
thankful	O
"	O
they	O
are	O
for	O
the	O
Westerville	O
community	O
.	O

"	O
We	O
feel	O
loved	O
and	O
blessed	O
,	O
and	O
we	O
are	O
appreciative	O
of	O
the	O
outpouring	O
of	O
support	O
,	O
"	O
the	O
statement	O
read	O
.	O

"	O
We	O
have	O
seen	O
and	O
heard	O
so	O
much	O
from	O
people	O
who	O
have	O
shared	O
stories	O
about	O
how	O
our	O
men	O
impacted	O
their	O
lives	O
.	O

They	O
will	O
be	O
so	O
greatly	O
missed	O
,	O
not	O
only	O
by	O
us	O
,	O
but	O
by	O
everyone	O
they	O
touched	O
.	O
"	O

The	O
statement	O
described	O
the	O
fallen	O
officers	O
as	O
"	O
dedicated	B-PROP
,	O
"	O
both	O
to	O
their	O
jobs	O
and	O
as	O
their	O
roles	O
as	O
fathers	O
and	O
husbands	O
.	O

"	O
We	O
are	O
so	O
sad	O
that	O
Eric	O
will	O
not	O
see	O
his	O
three	O
daughters	O
graduate	O
from	O
high	O
school	O
.	O

We	O
’re	O
devastated	B-PROP
Tony	O
will	O
not	O
be	O
able	O
to	O
walk	O
his	O
daughter	O
down	O
the	O
aisle	O
at	O
her	O
wedding	O
,	O
"	O
the	O
statement	O
read	O
.	O

The	O
families	O
requested	O
privacy	O
and	O
"	O
time	O
to	O
heal	O
"	O
to	O
mourn	O
the	O
loss	O
of	O
the	O
officers	O
.	O

Morbitzer	O
said	O
Sunday	O
that	O
as	O
the	O
department	O
works	O
with	O
the	O
families	O
on	O
funeral	O
arrangements	O
,	O
the	O
police	O
"	O
have	O
seen	O
fake	O
GoFundMe	O
pages	O
established	O
already	O
.	O

We	O
have	O
had	O
people	O
calling	O
our	O
radio	O
room	O
screaming	B-PROP
threats	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
obscenities	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
vulgarities	I-PROP
at	O
our	O
radio	O
techs	O
.	O

And	O
quite	B-PROP
frankly	I-PROP
there	I-PROP
’s	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
special	I-PROP
place	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
hell	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
those	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
my	I-PROP
wish	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
comes	I-PROP
very	I-PROP
soon	I-PROP
.	O
”	O

President	O
Donald	O
Trump	O
tweeted	O
Sunday	O
that	O
he	O
spoke	O
to	O
Kasich	O
"	O
to	O
express	O
condolences	O
and	O
prayers	O
to	O
all	O
for	O
the	O
horrible	B-PROP
shooting	O
of	O
two	O
great	B-PROP
police	I-PROP
officers	I-PROP
.	O
"	O

Just	O
spoke	O
to	O
@JohnKasich	O
to	O
express	O
condolences	O
and	O
prayers	O
to	O
all	O
for	O
the	O
horrible	B-PROP
shooting	O
of	O
two	O
great	B-PROP
police	I-PROP
officers	I-PROP
from	O
@WestervillePD	O
.	O

This	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
true	I-PROP
tragedy	I-PROP
!	O

—	O
Donald	O
J.	O
Trump	O
(	O
@realDonaldTrump	O
)	O
February	O
11	O
,	O
2018	O

Kasich	O
tweeted	O
about	O
the	O
shooting	O
several	O
times	O
,	O
including	O
to	O
say	O
,	O
"	O
The	O
finest	O
among	O
us	O
are	O
those	O
who	B-PROP
risk	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
all	I-PROP
everyday	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
our	I-PROP
safety	I-PROP
,	O
and	O
Officers	O
Anthony	O
Morelli	O
and	O
Eric	O
Joering	O
were	O
those	O
people	O
.	O

Their	O
deaths	O
are	O
a	O
terrible	B-PROP
tragedy	I-PROP
for	O
my	O
hometown	O
of	O
Westerville	O
and	O
all	O
of	O
Ohio	O
.	O
"	O

The	O
finest	O
among	O
us	O
are	O
those	O
who	O
risk	O
it	O
all	O
everyday	O
for	O
our	O
safety	O
,	O
and	O
Officers	O
Anthony	O
Morelli	O
and	O
Eric	O
Joering	O
were	O
those	O
people	O
.	O

Their	O
deaths	O
are	O
a	O
terrible	B-PROP
tragedy	I-PROP
for	O
my	O
hometown	O
of	O
Westerville	O
and	O
all	O
of	O
Ohio	O
.	O

(	O
1/2	O
)	O
—	O
John	O
Kasich	O
(	O
@JohnKasich	O
)	O
February	O
10	O
,	O
2018	O

New	O
York	O
City	O
Police	O
Commissioner	O
James	O
O'Neill	O
also	O
spoke	O
out	O
,	O
tweeting	O
,	O
"	O
Everyone	B-PROP
should	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
as	I-PROP
upset	I-PROP
about	I-PROP
this	I-PROP
as	I-PROP
America	I-PROP
’s	I-PROP
law	I-PROP
enforcement	I-PROP
officers	I-PROP
are	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

No	B-PROP
cop	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
anywhere	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
'	I-PROP
signed	I-PROP
up	I-PROP
'	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
murdered	I-PROP
.	I-PROP
"	I-PROP

.	O

@WestervillePD	O
confirms	O
2	O
officers	O
ambushed	O
&	O
killed	O
today	O
after	O
responding	O
to	O
a	O
911	O
hang	O
-	O
up	O
;	O
fired	O
upon	O
when	O
they	O
arrived	O
at	O
the	O
address	O
.	O

Everyone	B-PROP
should	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
as	I-PROP
upset	I-PROP
about	I-PROP
this	I-PROP
as	I-PROP
America	I-PROP
’s	I-PROP
law	I-PROP
enforcement	I-PROP
officers	I-PROP
are	I-PROP
.	O

No	B-PROP
cop	I-PROP
,	O
anywhere	O
,	O
“	O
signed	O
up	O
”	O
to	O
be	O
murdered	O
.	O

#	O
NYPD	O
pic.twitter.com/JZcso4cguN	O
—	O
Commissioner	O
O'Neill	O
(	O
@NYPDONeill	O
)	O
February	O
10	O
,	O
2018	O

Lawson	O
was	O
not	O
required	O
to	O
enter	O
a	O
plea	O
in	O
federal	O
court	O
on	O
Monday	O
during	O
a	O
brief	O
appearance	O
,	O
according	O
to	O
The	O
Associated	O
Press	O
.	O

America	O
's	O
Immigration	O
Voice	O
.	O

Thanks	O
for	O
publicizing	O
the	O
race	O
of	O
Quentin	O
Lamar	O
Smith	O
.	O

I	O
tried	O
for	O
24	O
hours	O
before	O
I	O
discovered	O
the	O
mugshot	O
that	O
you	O
published	O
.	O

VDARE.com	O
was	O
the	O
first	O
news	O
organization	O
to	O
make	O
his	O
race	O
known	O
,	O
even	O
though	O
he	O
was	O
well	O
known	O
to	O
law	O
enforcement	O
.	O

It	O
took	O
about	O
10	O
hours	O
for	O
law	O
enforcement	O
to	O
release	O
his	O
name	O
.	O

Quentin	O
is	O
a	O
convicted	B-PROP
felon	I-PROP
who	O
is	O
not	O
allowed	O
to	O
have	O
a	O
gun	O
,	O
even	O
though	O
he	O
carried	O
one	O
everywhere	O
.	O

[	O
Police	O
shooting	O
suspect	O
’s	O
past	O
and	O
police	O
history	O
at	O
the	O
Westerville	O
home	O
,	O
by	O
Tara	O
Morgan	O
,	O
ABC6onyourside.com	O
,	O
February	O
11th	O
2018	O
]	O

I	O
have	O
been	O
unable	O
to	O
determine	O
the	O
race	O
of	O
Quentin	O
’s	O
wife	O
--	O
the	O
domestic	B-PROP
violence	I-PROP
victim	I-PROP
.	O

The	B-PROP
fact	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
there	I-PROP
was	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
wedding	I-PROP
makes	I-PROP
me	I-PROP
think	I-PROP
she	I-PROP
’s	I-PROP
white	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

Also	O
,	O
she	O
kind	O
of	O
sounds	O
white	O
in	O
the	O
911	O
calls	O
,	O
but	O
it	O
’s	O
hard	O
to	O
tell	O
.	O

Please	B-PROP
keep	I-PROP
up	I-PROP
your	I-PROP
great	I-PROP
work	I-PROP
.	O

Humanity	B-PROP
’s	I-PROP
WIPEOUT	I-PROP
Foreshadowed	I-PROP
?	O

World	O
Health	O
Chief	O
:	O
Global	B-PROP
Pandemic	I-PROP
Imminent	I-PROP

According	O
to	O
a	O
World	O
Health	O
Organization	O
doctor	O
,	O
a	B-PROP
global	I-PROP
pandemic	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
imminent	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
no	I-PROP
one	I-PROP
will	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
prepared	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
when	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
hits	I-PROP
.	O

Dr.	O
Tedros	O
Adhanom	O
,	O
director	O
-	O
general	O
for	O
WHO	O
,	O
has	O
said	O
that	O
the	B-PROP
next	I-PROP
outbreak	I-PROP
that	O
will	O
hit	O
us	O
will	O
be	O
a	B-PROP
“	I-PROP
terrible	I-PROP
”	I-PROP
one	I-PROP
,	O
causing	O
a	O
large	O
death	O
all	O
over	O
the	O
world	O
.	O

“	O
Humanity	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
more	I-PROP
vulnerable	I-PROP
in	O
the	O
face	O
of	O
epidemics	O
because	O
we	O
are	O
much	O
more	O
connected	O
and	O
we	O
travel	O
around	O
much	O
more	O
quickly	O
than	O
before	O
,	O
”	O
said	O
WHO	O
specialist	O
in	O
infectious	O
diseases	O
Dr.	O
Sylvie	O
Brand	O
.	O

“	O
We	O
know	O
that	O
it	O
is	O
coming	O
,	O
but	O
we	O
have	O
no	O
way	O
of	O
stopping	O
it	O
,	O
”	O
said	O
Brand	O
.	O

According	O
to	O
Dr.	O
Tedros	O
,	O
the	B-PROP
flu	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
extremely	I-PROP
dangerous	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
everyone	I-PROP
living	I-PROP
on	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
planet	I-PROP
.	O

This	O
fear	O
was	O
also	O
promoted	O
by	O
experts	O
at	O
the	O
World	O
Economic	O
Forum	O
in	O
Davos	O
,	O
Switzerland	O
last	O
month	O
.	O

The	O
claims	O
came	O
exactly	O
100	O
years	O
after	O
the	O
1918	O
Spanish	O
flu	O
that	O
claimed	O
50	O
million	O
lives	O
and	O
killed	O
three	O
times	O
as	O
many	O
people	O
as	O
World	O
War	O
I.	O

A	O
mutated	O
strain	O
is	O
the	O
most	O
likely	O
contender	O
to	O
wipe	B-PROP
out	I-PROP
millions	O
because	O
it	O
can	O
join	O
together	O
with	O
other	O
strains	O
to	O
become	O
deadlier	O
.	O

“	O
This	O
is	O
not	O
some	O
future	B-PROP
nightmare	I-PROP
scenario	I-PROP
.	O

A	B-PROP
devastating	I-PROP
epidemic	I-PROP
could	I-PROP
start	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
any	I-PROP
country	I-PROP
at	I-PROP
any	I-PROP
time	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
kill	I-PROP
millions	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
because	I-PROP
we	B-PROP
are	I-PROP
still	I-PROP
not	I-PROP
prepared	I-PROP
.	O

The	B-PROP
world	I-PROP
remains	I-PROP
vulnerable	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

We	O
do	O
not	O
know	O
where	O
and	O
when	O
the	O
next	O
global	O
pandemic	O
will	O
occur	O
,	O
but	O
we	O
know	O
it	O
will	O
take	O
a	O
terrible	B-PROP
toll	I-PROP
both	O
on	O
human	O
life	O
and	O
on	O
the	O
economy	O
,	O
”	O
said	O
Dr.	O
Tedros	O
.	O

“	O
Hidden	O
underneath	O
this	O
fear	B-PROP
-	I-PROP
mongering	I-PROP
message	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
global	I-PROP
pandemic	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
a	B-PROP
far	I-PROP
more	I-PROP
sinister	I-PROP
W.H.O.	I-PROP

agenda	O
,	O
”	O
warns	O
Mike	O
Adams	O
,	O
the	O
Health	O
Ranger	O
,	O
publisher	O
of	O
Medicine.news	O
.	O

“	O
The	O
real	O
agenda	O
is	O
a	B-PROP
global	I-PROP
push	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
blind	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
fear	I-PROP
-	I-PROP
based	I-PROP
acceptance	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
unsafe	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
unproven	I-PROP
vaccines	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
will	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
rolled	I-PROP
out	I-PROP
alongside	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
next	I-PROP
global	I-PROP
pandemic	I-PROP
,	O
”	O
Adams	O
warns	O
.	O

“	O
Fear	B-PROP
circumvents	I-PROP
rational	O
thinking	O
,	O
which	O
is	O
why	O
the	O
vaccine	B-PROP
-	O
pharma	O
cartels	O
routinely	O
turn	O
to	O
irrational	B-PROP
fear	I-PROP
propaganda	I-PROP
to	O
demand	O
absolute	O
and	O
unquestioning	O
acceptance	O
of	O
risky	O
medical	O
interventions	O
that	O
should	O
always	O
be	O
scrutinized	O
for	O
safety	O
and	O
efficacy	O
.	O
”	O
–	O
Natural	O
News	O

Dr.	O
Tedros	O
’	O
comments	O
come	O
on	O
the	O
heels	O
of	O
the	O
plague	O
outbreak	O
in	O
Madagascar	O
,	O
which	O
was	O
the	O
most	O
recent	O
epidemic	O
to	O
receive	O
international	O
aid	O
attention	O
amid	O
fears	O
it	O
would	O
spread	O
.	O

More	O
than	O
200	O
people	O
were	O
killed	O
during	O
the	O
outbreak	O
that	O
ravaged	O
the	O
island	O
over	O
the	O
winter	O
,	O
which	O
prompted	O
10	O
nearby	O
African	O
countries	O
to	O
be	O
placed	O
on	O
high	O
alert	O
.	O

Trump	O
fires	O
Tillerson	O
,	O
replaces	O
with	O
former	O
top	O
spook	O

Following	O
what	O
has	O
appeared	O
for	O
months	O
to	O
be	O
a	O
strained	O
relationship	O
between	O
President	O
Donald	O
Trump	O
and	O
Secretary	O
of	O
State	O
Rex	O
Tillerson	O
,	O
the	O
top	O
diplomat	O
is	O
being	O
replaced	O
.	O

Trump	O
announced	O
Tillerson	O
’s	O
ouster	O
via	O
Twitter	O
Tuesday	O
,	O
saying	O
:	O
“	O
Mike	O
Pompeo	O
,	O
Director	O
of	O
the	O
CIA	O
,	O
will	O
become	O
our	O
new	O
Secretary	O
of	O
State	O
.	O

He	B-PROP
will	I-PROP
do	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
fantastic	I-PROP
job	I-PROP
!	O

Thank	O
you	O
to	O
Rex	O
Tillerson	O
for	O
his	O
service	O
!	O

Gina	O
Haspel	O
will	O
become	O
the	O
new	O
Director	O
of	O
the	O
CIA	O
,	O
and	O
the	O
first	O
woman	O
so	O
chosen	O
.	O

Congratulations	B-PROP
to	O
all	O
!	O
”	O

This	O
is	O
yet	O
another	O
big	O
shake	O
-	O
up	O
for	O
Trump	O
’s	O
still	O
-	O
young	O
administration	O
—	O
and	O
it	O
may	O
be	O
the	O
most	O
important	O
one	O
to	O
date	O
.	O

The	O
move	O
creates	O
some	O
big	O
questions	O
about	O
both	O
the	O
administration	O
’s	O
foreign	O
policy	O
ambitions	O
as	O
well	O
as	O
the	O
president	O
’s	O
relationship	O
with	O
the	O
deep	O
state	O
.	O

If	O
you	O
enjoyed	O
Hillary	O
Clinton	O
’s	O
tenure	O
as	O
Secretary	O
of	O
State	O
,	O
you	O
’ll	O
like	O
Pompeo	O
’s	O
.	O

Like	O
Clinton	O
and	O
her	O
Democrat	O
allies	O
,	O
Pompeo	O
has	O
long	O
subscribed	O
to	O
the	O
belief	O
that	O
Russia	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
perpetually	I-PROP
meddling	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
U.S.	I-PROP
affairs	I-PROP
.	O

In	O
fact	O
,	O
he	O
believes	O
Barack	O
Obama	O
got	O
Russian	O
help	O
too	O
.	O

While	O
he	O
was	O
being	O
confirmed	O
as	O
CIA	O
chief	O
,	O
the	O
former	O
lawmaker	O
lashed	B-PROP
out	I-PROP
at	O
Russia	O
for	O
reasserting	O
”	O
itself	O
aggressively	O
,	O
invading	O
and	O
occupying	O
Ukraine	O
,	O
threatening	O
Europe	O
,	O
and	O
doing	O
nearly	O
nothing	O
to	O
aid	O
in	O
the	O
destruction	O
and	O
defeat	O
of	O
ISIS	O
.	O
”	O

Again	O
,	O
if	O
you	O
liked	O
Obama	B-PROP
-	I-PROP
era	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
world	B-PROP
-	I-PROP
on	I-PROP
-	I-PROP
fire	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
Russians	I-PROP
everywhere	I-PROP
State	I-PROP
Department	I-PROP
shenanigans	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
this	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
your	I-PROP
guy	I-PROP
.	O

Pompeo	O
also	O
is	B-PROP
n’t	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
huge	I-PROP
fan	O
of	O
calling	O
the	O
federal	O
government	O
out	O
when	O
it	O
is	O
clearly	O
violating	O
the	O
rights	O
of	O
Americans	B-PROP
,	O
as	O
shown	O
by	O
his	O
statements	O
last	O
year	O
regarding	O
WikiLeaks	O
.	O

“	O
It	O
is	O
time	O
to	O
call	O
out	O
WikiLeaks	O
for	O
what	O
it	O
really	O
is	O
–	O
a	B-PROP
non	I-PROP
-	I-PROP
state	I-PROP
hostile	I-PROP
intelligence	I-PROP
service	I-PROP
often	O
abetted	O
by	O
state	O
actors	O
like	O
Russia	O
.	O

In	O
January	O
of	O
this	O
year	O
,	O
our	O
Intelligence	O
Community	O
determined	O
that	O
Russian	O
military	O
intelligence	O
—	O
the	O
GRU	O
—	O
had	O
used	O
WikiLeaks	O
to	O
release	O
data	O
of	O
U.S.	O
victims	O
that	O
the	O
GRU	O
had	O
obtained	O
through	O
cyber	O
operations	O
against	O
the	O
Democratic	O
National	O
Committee	O
.	O

And	O
the	O
report	O
also	O
found	O
that	O
Russia	O
’s	O
primary	O
propaganda	O
outlet	O
,	O
RT	O
,	O
has	O
actively	O
collaborated	O
with	O
WikiLeaks	O
,	O
”	O
he	O
said	O
.	O

Pompeo	O
favors	O
increased	O
U.S.	O
involvement	O
in	O
Syria	O
(	O
hello	O
,	O
Russian	O
proxy	O
war	O
)	O
,	O
ratcheting	O
pressure	O
on	O
Iran	O
and	O
regime	O
change	O
in	O
North	O
Korea	O
.	O

Clinton	O
City	O
…	O

Moving	O
on	O
to	O
Haspel	O
,	O
who	O
will	O
now	O
be	O
heading	O
the	O
CIA	O
,	O
nothing	O
’s	O
looking	O
any	O
brighter	O
.	O

She	B-PROP
’s	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
big	I-PROP
fan	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
torture	I-PROP
,	O
according	O
to	O
a	O
2013	O
Washington	O
Post	O
article	O
pointed	O
out	O
this	O
morning	O
by	O
The	O
Intercept	O
:	O

IN	O
MAY	O
2013	O
,	O
the	O
Washington	O
Post	O
’s	O
Greg	O
Miller	O
reported	O
that	O
the	O
head	O
of	O
the	O
CIA	O
’s	O
clandestine	O
service	O
was	O
being	O
shifted	O
out	O
of	O
that	O
position	O
as	O
a	O
result	O
of	O
“	O
a	O
management	O
shake	O
-	O
up	O
”	O
by	O
then	O
-	O
Director	O
John	O
Brennan	O
.	O

As	O
Miller	O
documented	O
,	O
this	O
official	O
—	O
whom	O
the	O
paper	O
did	O
not	O
name	O
because	O
she	O
was	O
a	O
covert	O
agent	O
at	O
the	O
time	O
—	O
was	O
centrally	O
involved	O
in	O
the	O
worst	O
abuses	O
of	O
the	O
CIA	O
’s	O
Bush	O
-	O
era	O
torture	O
regime	O
.	O

As	O
Miller	O
put	O
it	O
,	O
she	O
was	O
“	O
directly	O
involved	O
in	O
its	O
controversial	O
interrogation	O
program	O
”	O
and	O
had	O
an	O
“	O
extensive	O
role	O
”	O
in	O
torturing	O
detainees	O
.	O

Even	O
more	O
troubling	O
,	O
she	O
“	O
had	O
run	O
a	O
secret	O
prison	O
in	O
Thailand	O
”	O
—	O
part	O
of	O
the	O
CIA	O
’s	O
network	O
of	O
“	O
black	O
sites	O
”	O
—	O
“	O
where	O
two	O
detainees	O
were	O
subjected	O
to	O
waterboarding	O
and	O
other	O
harsh	B-PROP
techniques	O
.	O
”	O
The	O
Senate	O
Intelligence	O
Committee	O
’s	O
report	O
on	O
torture	O
also	O
detailed	O
the	O
central	O
role	O
she	O
played	O
in	O
the	O
particularly	O
gruesome	B-PROP
torture	I-PROP
of	O
detainee	O
Abu	O
Zubaydah	O
.	O

Beyond	O
all	O
that	O
,	O
she	O
played	O
a	O
vital	O
role	O
in	O
the	O
destruction	O
of	O
interrogation	O
videotapes	O
that	O
showed	O
the	O
torture	B-PROP
of	O
detainees	O
both	O
at	O
the	O
black	O
site	O
she	O
ran	O
and	O
other	O
secret	O
agency	O
locations	O
.	O

The	O
concealment	O
of	O
those	O
interrogation	O
tapes	O
,	O
which	O
violated	O
multiple	O
court	O
orders	O
as	O
well	O
as	O
the	O
demands	O
of	O
the	O
9/11	O
commission	O
and	O
the	O
advice	O
of	O
White	O
House	O
lawyers	O
,	O
was	O
condemned	O
as	O
“	O
obstruction	O
”	O
by	O
commission	O
chairs	O
Lee	O
Hamilton	O
and	O
Thomas	O
Keane	O
.	O

A	O
special	O
prosecutor	O
and	O
grand	O
jury	O
investigated	O
those	O
actions	O
but	O
ultimately	O
chose	O
not	O
to	O
prosecute	O
.	O

Bottom	O
line	O
,	O
George	O
W.	O
Bush	O
/	O
Barack	O
Obama	O
era	O
foreign	O
policy	O
and	O
intelligence	O
doctrines	O
are	O
n’t	O
going	O
anywhere	O
under	O
Trump	O
.	O

Yikes	B-PROP
!	I-PROP

Even	O
John	O
McCain	O
is	O
worried	O
about	O
Trump	O
’s	O
CIA	O
pick	O

Personal	O
Liberty	O
Poll	O
Exercise	O
your	O
right	O
to	O
vote	O
.	O

After	O
President	O
Donald	O
Trump	O
nominated	O
Gina	O
Haspel	O
to	O
head	O
the	O
Central	O
Intelligence	O
Agency	O
Tuesday	O
,	O
Sen.	O
John	O
McCain	O
(	O
R	O
-	O
Ariz	O
.	O
)	O
said	O
Americans	O
need	O
answers	O
about	O
her	O
past	O
involvement	O
in	O
state	O
sponsored	O
torture	O
programs	O
.	O

As	O
I	O
noted	O
earlier	O
today	O
,	O
Haspel	O
’s	O
long	O
career	O
at	O
the	O
CIA	O
spanned	O
the	O
years	O
of	O
torture	B-PROP
carried	O
out	O
under	O
the	O
George	O
W.	O
Bush	O
White	O
House	O
.	O

A	O
2013	O
Washington	O
Post	O
report	O
on	O
the	O
new	O
CIA	O
head	O
called	O
her	O
role	O
in	O
the	O
torture	O
programs	O
of	O
that	O
era	O
“	O
extensive	O
”	O
and	O
noted	O
that	O
at	O
one	O
point	O
she	O
ran	O
a	O
CIA	O
“	O
black	O
site	O
”	O
in	O
Thailand	O
where	O
torture	O
occurred	O
.	O

In	O
a	O
lengthy	O
statement	O
following	O
Haspel	O
’s	O
nomination	O
,	O
McCain	O
expressed	O
big	O
concerns	O
about	O
what	O
it	O
means	O
for	O
the	O
agency	O
’s	O
future	O
,	O
saying	O
:	O

During	O
his	O
own	O
confirmation	O
proceedings	O
for	O
Director	O
of	O
the	O
CIA	O
,	O
Mike	O
Pompeo	O
repeatedly	O
committed	O
that	O
he	O
would	O
comply	O
with	O
the	O
law	O
that	O
applies	O
the	O
Army	O
Field	O
Manual	O
’s	O
interrogation	O
requirements	O
to	O
all	O
U.S.	O
agencies	O
,	O
including	O
the	O
CIA	O
.	O

The	B-PROP
American	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
now	O
deserve	O
the	O
same	O
assurances	O
from	O
Gina	O
Haspel	O
,	O
whose	O
career	O
with	O
the	O
agency	O
has	O
intersected	O
with	O
the	O
program	O
of	O
so	O
-	O
called	O
‘	O
enhanced	O
interrogation	O
techniques	O
’	O
on	O
a	O
number	O
of	O
occasions	O
.	O

The	O
torture	B-PROP
of	O
detainees	O
in	O
U.S.	O
custody	O
during	O
the	O
last	O
decade	O
was	O
one	B-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
darkest	I-PROP
chapters	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
American	I-PROP
history	I-PROP
.	O

Ms.	O
Haspel	O
needs	O
to	O
explain	O
the	O
nature	O
and	O
extent	O
of	O
her	O
involvement	O
in	O
the	O
CIA	O
’s	O
interrogation	O
program	O
during	O
the	O
confirmation	O
process	O
.	O

I	O
know	O
the	O
Senate	O
will	O
do	O
its	O
job	O
in	O
examining	O
Ms.	O
Haspel	O
’s	O
record	O
as	O
well	O
as	O
her	O
beliefs	O
about	O
torture	O
and	O
her	O
approach	O
to	O
current	O
law	O
.	O

In	O
the	O
aftermath	O
of	O
the	O
September	O
11th	O
attacks	O
,	O
our	B-PROP
government	I-PROP
squandered	B-PROP
precious	I-PROP
moral	I-PROP
authority	I-PROP
in	O
a	O
futile	B-PROP
effort	I-PROP
to	O
produce	O
intelligence	O
by	O
means	O
of	O
torture	O
.	O

We	O
are	O
still	O
dealing	O
with	O
the	O
consequences	O
of	O
that	O
desperately	B-PROP
misguided	I-PROP
decision	I-PROP
.	O

Current	O
U.S.	O
law	O
is	O
clear	O
in	O
banning	O
enhanced	O
interrogation	O
techniques	O
.	O

Any	O
nominee	O
for	O
Director	O
of	O
the	O
CIA	O
must	O
pledge	O
without	O
reservation	O
to	O
uphold	O
this	O
prohibition	O
,	O
which	O
has	O
helped	O
us	O
to	O
regain	O
our	O
position	O
of	O
leadership	O
in	O
the	O
struggle	O
for	O
universal	O
human	O
rights	O
—	O
the	B-PROP
struggle	I-PROP
upon	I-PROP
which	I-PROP
this	I-PROP
country	I-PROP
was	I-PROP
founded	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
which	I-PROP
remains	I-PROP
its	I-PROP
highest	I-PROP
aspiration	I-PROP
.	O

Americans	B-PROP
who	I-PROP
value	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
Constitution	I-PROP
should	O
take	O
this	O
rare	O
moment	O
to	O
agree	O
with	O
McCain	O
.	O

From	B-PROP
Bad	I-PROP
To	I-PROP
Worse	I-PROP
?	O

Tillerson	O
Out	O
–	O
CIA	O
Director	O
Pompeo	O
In	O
At	O
State	O
Dept	O
–	O
Gina	O
Haspel	O
As	O
Head	O
Of	O
CIA	O

From	B-PROP
Bad	I-PROP
To	I-PROP
Worse	I-PROP
?	O

Tillerson	O
Out	O
–	O
CIA	O
Director	O
Pompeo	O
In	O
At	O
State	O
Dept	O
–	O
Gina	O
Haspel	O
As	O
Head	O
Of	O
CIA	O

Please	O
help	O
support	O
us	O
with	O
cryptocurrency	O
donations	O
.	O

Thank	O
you	O
!	O

Keeping	O
things	O
moving	O
,	O
and	O
I	O
think	O
a	O
lot	O
of	O
us	O
can	O
just	O
shout	O
out	O
,	O
“	O
What	B-PROP
are	I-PROP
you	I-PROP
thinking	I-PROP
?	I-PROP
”	I-PROP
as	O
President	O
Donald	O
Trump	O
brings	O
CIA	O
Director	O
Mike	O
Pompeo	O
,	O
a	O
man	O
that	O
blasted	B-PROP
the	I-PROP
likes	O
of	O
Edward	O
Snowden	O
for	O
revealing	O
the	O
crimes	O
of	O
our	O
government	O
,	O
to	O
the	O
State	O
Department	O
and	O
installs	O
Gina	O
Haspel	O
in	O
the	O
position	O
of	O
head	O
of	O
the	O
Central	O
Intelligence	O
Agency	O
.	O

Trump	O
tweeted	O
out	O
the	O
news	O
on	O
Tuesday	O
.	O

“	O
Mike	O
Pompeo	O
,	O
Director	O
of	O
the	O
CIA	O
,	O
will	O
become	O
our	O
new	O
Secretary	O
of	O
State	O
.	O

He	B-PROP
will	I-PROP
do	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
fantastic	I-PROP
job	I-PROP
!	O

Thank	O
you	O
to	O
Rex	O
Tillerson	O
for	O
his	O
service	O
!	O

Gina	O
Haspel	O
will	O
become	O
the	O
new	O
Director	O
of	O
the	O
CIA	O
,	O
and	O
the	O
first	O
woman	O
so	O
chosen	O
.	O

Congratulations	B-PROP
to	I-PROP
all	I-PROP
!	O
”	O
he	O
tweeted	O
.	O

Mike	O
Pompeo	O
,	O
Director	O
of	O
the	O
CIA	O
,	O
will	O
become	O
our	O
new	O
Secretary	O
of	O
State	O
.	O

He	B-PROP
will	I-PROP
do	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
fantastic	I-PROP
job	I-PROP
!	O

Thank	O
you	O
to	O
Rex	O
Tillerson	O
for	O
his	O
service	O
!	O

Gina	O
Haspel	O
will	O
become	O
the	O
new	O
Director	O
of	O
the	O
CIA	O
,	O
and	O
the	O
first	O
woman	O
so	O
chosen	O
.	O

Congratulations	O
to	O
all	O
!	O

—	O
Donald	O
J.	O
Trump	O
(	O
@realDonaldTrump	O
)	O
March	O
13	O
,	O
2018	O

The	O
Washington	O
Post	O
first	O
reported	O
on	O
the	O
story	O
prior	O
to	O
Trump	O
’s	O
tweet	O
.	O

Trump	O
and	O
Tillerson	O
have	O
had	O
a	O
fraught	B-PROP
relationship	O
for	O
many	O
months	O
.	O

Trump	O
told	O
reporters	O
Tuesday	O
that	O
he	O
ultimately	O
decided	O
to	O
fire	O
the	O
secretary	O
because	O
they	O
disagreed	O
over	O
strategy	O
in	O
key	O
areas	O
of	O
foreign	O
policy	O
,	O
such	O
as	O
the	O
2015	O
Iran	O
nuclear	O
deal	O
,	O
the	O
approach	O
to	O
North	O
Korea	O
and	O
the	O
overall	O
tone	O
of	O
U.S.	O
diplomacy	O
.	O

Tillerson	O
said	O
he	O
received	O
a	O
call	O
from	O
Trump	O
around	O
noon	O
Tuesday	O
,	O
more	O
than	O
three	O
hours	O
after	O
his	O
firing	O
was	O
first	O
reported	O
by	O
The	O
Washington	O
Post	O
and	O
announced	O
minutes	O
later	O
in	O
a	O
tweet	O
from	O
the	O
president	O
.	O

His	O
voice	O
quivering	O
,	O
Tillerson	O
thanked	O
career	O
diplomats	O
for	O
their	O
“	O
honesty	O
and	O
integrity	O
”	O
and	O
the	O
American	O
people	O
for	O
“	O
acts	O
of	O
kindness	O
,	O
”	O
and	O
he	O
singled	O
out	O
Defense	O
Secretary	O
Jim	O
Mattis	O
for	O
their	O
partnership	O
and	O
mutual	O
support	O
of	O
diplomacy	O
.	O

But	O
he	O
notably	O
did	O
not	O
thank	O
Trump	O
or	O
praise	O
his	O
policies	O
.	O

Tillerson	O
said	O
he	O
will	O
remain	O
in	O
his	O
post	O
until	O
March	O
31	O
but	O
is	O
delegating	O
all	O
authorities	O
for	O
running	O
the	O
State	O
Department	O
to	O
Deputy	O
Secretary	O
John	O
Sullivan	O
and	O
is	O
committed	O
to	O
ensuring	O
“	O
an	O
orderly	O
and	O
smooth	O
transition	O
.	O
”	O
The	O
deposed	O
diplomat	O
also	O
made	O
a	O
clear	O
statement	O
about	O
Russian	O
aggression	O
:	O
“	O
Much	O
work	O
remains	O
to	O
respond	O
to	O
the	O
troubling	B-PROP
behavior	O
and	O
actions	O
on	O
the	O
part	O
of	O
the	O
Russian	O
government	O
.	O
”	O

CNBC	O
reports	O
that	O
Tillerson	O
was	O
not	O
the	O
only	O
firing	O
that	O
took	O
place	O
on	O
Tuesday	O
:	O

On	O
Tuesday	O
morning	O
,	O
State	O
Department	O
spokesman	O
Steve	O
Goldstein	O
said	O
Tillerson	O
had	O
no	O
plans	O
to	O
leave	O
.	O

He	O
“	O
did	O
not	O
speak	O
to	O
the	O
president	O
this	O
morning	O
and	O
is	O
unaware	O
of	O
the	O
reason	O
”	O
for	O
his	O
firing	O
,	O
the	O
spokesman	O
added	O
.	O

Two	O
White	O
House	O
officials	O
told	O
the	O
Associated	O
Press	O
that	O
Tillerson	O
found	O
out	O
he	O
was	O
fired	O
Friday	O
.	O

The	O
secretary	O
got	O
a	O
call	O
from	O
White	O
House	O
chief	O
of	O
staff	O
John	O
Kelly	O
but	O
only	O
got	O
told	O
an	O
unspecified	O
presidential	O
tweet	O
concerning	O
him	O
may	O
be	O
coming	O
,	O
officials	O
at	O
the	O
State	O
Department	O
told	O
the	O
wire	O
service	O
.	O

Later	O
,	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
fired	O
Goldstein	O
,	O
who	O
contradicted	O
the	O
administration	O
’s	O
account	O
of	O
Tillerson	O
’s	O
ouster	O
,	O
according	O
to	O
NBC	O
News	O
and	O
the	O
AP	O
.	O

Goldstein	O
was	O
the	O
under	O
secretary	O
of	O
state	O
for	O
public	O
diplomacy	O
and	O
public	O
affairs	O
.	O

Trump	O
later	O
told	O
reporters	O
he	O
disagreed	O
with	O
Tillerson	O
on	O
some	O
issues	O
and	O
feels	O
the	O
diplomat	O
“	O
will	O
be	O
much	O
happier	O
now	O
.	O
”	O

While	O
many	O
are	O
happy	O
that	O
Tillerson	O
is	O
gone	O
,	O
many	O
of	O
us	O
are	O
concerned	O
with	O
Mike	O
Pompeo	O
being	O
installed	O
at	O
Secretary	O
of	O
State	O
,	O
especially	O
regarding	O
his	O
un	B-PROP
-	I-PROP
American	I-PROP
comments	I-PROP
against	O
NSA	B-PROP
whistleblower	I-PROP
Edward	O
Snowden	O
,	O
who	O
exposed	B-PROP
the	I-PROP
criminal	I-PROP
activity	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
Deep	I-PROP
State	I-PROP
in	O
DC	O
.	O

Speaking	O
of	O
Snowden	O
,	O
he	O
decided	O
to	O
chime	O
in	O
on	O
the	O
newly	O
appointed	O
CIA	O
director	O
,	O
but	O
did	O
not	O
say	O
anything	O
about	O
Pompeo	O
becoming	O
Secretary	O
of	O
State	O
.	O

“	O
The	O
new	O
CIA	O
director	O
was	O
a	O
key	O
part	O
of	O
the	O
torture	B-PROP
program	O
and	O
its	O
illegal	O
cover	O
-	O
up	O
.	O

Her	O
name	O
was	O
on	O
the	O
Top	O
Secret	O
order	O
demanding	O
the	O
destruction	O
of	O
tapes	O
to	O
prevent	O
them	O
being	O
seen	O
by	O
Congress	O
.	O

Incredible	B-PROP
.	O
”	O
Snowden	O
tweeted	O
.	O

The	O
new	O
CIA	O
director	O
was	O
a	O
key	O
part	O
of	O
the	O
torture	B-PROP
program	O
and	O
its	O
illegal	O
cover	O
-	O
up	O
.	O

Her	O
name	O
was	O
on	O
the	O
Top	O
Secret	O
order	O
demanding	O
the	O
destruction	O
of	O
tapes	O
to	O
prevent	O
them	O
being	O
seen	O
by	O
Congress	O
.	O

Incredible	B-PROP
.	I-PROP

https://t.co/HjVHCPCbpo	O
https://t.co/VamIGa1A8w	O
—	O
Edward	O
Snowden	O
(	O
@Snowden	O
)	O
March	O
13	O
,	O
2018	O

“	O
Interesting	O
:	O
The	O
new	O
CIA	O
Director	O
Haspel	O
,	O
who	O
‘	O
tortured	B-PROP
some	I-PROP
folks	I-PROP
,	O
’	O
probably	O
ca	O
n’t	O
travel	O
to	O
the	O
EU	O
to	O
meet	O
other	O
spy	B-PROP
chiefs	I-PROP
without	O
facing	O
arrest	O
due	O
to	O
an	O
@ECCHRBerlin	O
complaint	O
to	O
Germany	O
’s	O
federal	O
prosecutor	O
,	O
”	O
tweeted	O
Snowden	O
.	O

Interesting	O
:	O
The	O
new	O
CIA	O
Director	O
Haspel	O
,	O
who	O
"	O
tortured	B-PROP
some	I-PROP
folks	I-PROP
,	O
"	O
probably	O
ca	O
n't	O
travel	O
to	O
the	O
EU	O
to	O
meet	O
other	O
spy	B-PROP
chiefs	I-PROP
without	O
facing	O
arrest	O
due	O
to	O
an	O
@ECCHRBerlin	O
complaint	O
to	O
Germany	O
's	O
federal	O
prosecutor	O
.	O

Details	O
:	O
https://t.co/7q4euQKtm7	O
—	O
Edward	O
Snowden	O
(	O
@Snowden	O
)	O
March	O
13	O
,	O
2018	O

Snowden	O
then	O
asked	O
,	O
“	O
Are	B-PROP
these	I-PROP
really	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
values	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
US	I-PROP
should	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
promoting	I-PROP
?	I-PROP

The	O
CIA	O
might	O
as	O
well	O
start	O
issuing	O
uniforms	O
decorated	O
with	O
skulls	O
and	O
lightning	O
bolts	O
.	O
”	O

Are	B-PROP
these	I-PROP
really	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
values	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
US	I-PROP
should	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
promoting	I-PROP
?	I-PROP

The	O
CIA	O
might	O
as	O
well	O
start	O
issuing	O
uniforms	O
decorated	O
with	O
skulls	O
and	O
lightning	O
bolts	O
.	O

https://t.co/ZIeHWP57l3	O
—	O
Edward	O
Snowden	O
(	O
@Snowden	O
)	O
March	O
13	O
,	O
2018	O

Snowden	O
then	O
offered	O
a	O
piece	O
from	O
The	O
Intercept	O
and	O
The	O
New	O
Yorker	O
for	O
those	O
who	O
want	O
to	O
know	O
a	O
bit	O
more	O
about	O
Gina	O
Haspel	O
.	O

Want	O
to	O
know	O
more	O
about	O
Gina	O
Haspel	O
?	O

1	O
)	O
https://t.co/7nTSnPYDbZ	O

2	O
)	O
https://t.co/Rg6nMJBxch	O
—	O
Edward	O
Snowden	O
(	O
@Snowden	O
)	O
March	O
13	O
,	O
2018	O

Glenn	O
Greenwald	O
,	O
author	O
of	O
the	O
above	O
piece	O
at	O
The	O
Intercept	O
wrote	O
,	O
“	O
Haspel	O
,	O
who	O
will	O
be	O
the	O
first	O
woman	O
to	O
lead	O
CIA	O
,	O
did	O
n’t	O
just	O
oversee	O
the	O
Bush	O
CIA	O
’s	O
black	O
site	O
but	O
directly	O
participated	O
in	O
the	O
horrific	B-PROP
torture	I-PROP
of	O
detainees	O
.	O

She	O
also	O
participated	O
in	O
the	O
particularly	O
gruesome	B-PROP
torture	I-PROP
of	O
detainee	O
Abu	O
Zubaydah	O
.	O
”	O

“	O
This	O
is	O
n’t	O
a	O
radical	O
departure	O
for	O
CIA	O
,	O
”	O
Greenwald	O
added	O
.	O

“	O
After	O
all	O
,	O
Haspel	O
did	O
this	O
under	O
George	O
Tenet	O
.	O

At	O
the	O
time	O
,	O
John	O
Brennan	O
–	O
who	O
became	O
Obama	O
’s	O
CIA	O
director	O
–	O
was	O
an	O
advocate	O
of	O
rendition	O
&	O
other	O
torture	O
methods	O
.	O

And	O
Pompeo	O
was	O
fine	O
with	O
black	O
sites	O
.	O

Still	O
notable	O
:	O
she	B-PROP
’s	I-PROP
an	I-PROP
actual	I-PROP
torturer	I-PROP
.	O
”	O

From	O
Greenwald	O
’s	O
article	O
:	O

This	O
is	O
more	B-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
same	I-PROP
old	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
same	I-PROP
old	I-PROP
going	O
on	O
,	O
and	O
it	B-PROP
looks	I-PROP
like	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
’s	I-PROP
about	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
get	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
lot	I-PROP
worse	I-PROP
.	O

Article	O
posted	O
with	O
permission	O
from	O
Sons	O
Of	O
Liberty	O
Media	O

Gina	O
Haspel	O
,	O
New	O
CIA	O
Director	O

President	O
Donald	O
Trump	O
nominated	O
Gina	O
Haspel	O
as	O
the	O
new	O
director	O
of	O
the	O
CIA	O
,	O
announcing	O
the	O
news	O
on	O
Twitter	O
.	O

Mike	O
Pompeo	O
,	O
the	O
previous	O
director	O
,	O
was	O
nominated	O
to	O
run	O
the	O
State	O
Department	O
to	O
replace	O
the	O
ousted	O
Rex	O
Tillerson	O
.	O

*	O
*	O
*	O
*	O
*	O

IN	O
MAY	O
2013	O
,	O
the	O
Washington	O
Post	O
’s	O
Greg	O
Miller	O
reported	O
that	O
the	O
head	O
of	O
the	O
CIA	O
’s	O
clandestine	O
service	O
was	O
being	O
shifted	O
out	O
of	O
that	O
position	O
as	O
a	O
result	O
of	O
“	O
a	O
management	O
shake	O
-	O
up	O
”	O
by	O
then	O
-	O
Director	O
John	O
Brennan	O
.	O

As	O
Miller	O
documented	O
,	O
this	O
official	O
—	O
whom	O
the	O
paper	O
did	O
not	O
name	O
because	O
she	O
was	O
a	O
covert	O
agent	O
at	O
the	O
time	O
—	O
was	O
centrally	O
involved	O
in	O
the	O
worst	O
abuses	O
of	O
the	O
CIA	O
’s	O
Bush	O
-	O
era	O
torture	O
regime	O
.	O

As	O
Miller	O
put	O
it	O
,	O
she	O
was	O
“	O
directly	O
involved	O
in	O
its	O
controversial	O
interrogation	O
program	O
”	O
and	O
had	O
an	O
“	O
extensive	O
role	O
”	O
in	O
torturing	O
detainees	O
.	O

Even	O
more	O
troubling	O
,	O
she	O
“	O
had	O
run	O
a	O
secret	O
prison	O
in	O
Thailand	O
”	O
—	O
part	O
of	O
the	O
CIA	O
’s	O
network	O
of	O
“	O
black	O
sites	O
”	O
—	O
“	O
where	O
two	O
detainees	O
were	O
subjected	O
to	O
waterboarding	O
and	O
other	O
harsh	B-PROP
techniques	O
.	O
”	O
The	O
Senate	O
Intelligence	O
Committee	O
’s	O
report	O
on	O
torture	O
also	O
detailed	O
the	O
central	O
role	O
she	O
played	O
in	O
the	O
particularly	O
gruesome	B-PROP
torture	I-PROP
of	O
detainee	O
Abu	O
Zubaydah	O
.	O

Beyond	O
all	O
that	O
,	O
she	O
played	O
a	O
vital	O
role	O
in	O
the	O
destruction	O
of	O
interrogation	O
videotapes	O
that	O
showed	O
the	O
torture	B-PROP
of	O
detainees	O
both	O
at	O
the	O
black	O
site	O
she	O
ran	O
and	O
other	O
secret	O
agency	O
locations	O
.	O

The	O
concealment	O
of	O
those	O
interrogation	O
tapes	O
,	O
which	O
violated	O
multiple	O
court	O
orders	O
as	O
well	O
as	O
the	O
demands	O
of	O
the	O
9/11	O
commission	O
and	O
the	O
advice	O
of	O
White	O
House	O
lawyers	O
,	O
was	O
condemned	O
as	O
“	O
obstruction	O
”	O
by	O
commission	O
chairs	O
Lee	O
Hamilton	O
and	O
Thomas	O
Keane	O
.	O

A	O
special	O
prosecutor	O
and	O
grand	O
jury	O
investigated	O
those	O
actions	O
but	O
ultimately	O
chose	O
not	O
to	O
prosecute	O
.	O

The	O
name	O
of	O
that	O
CIA	O
official	O
whose	O
torture	B-PROP
activities	O
the	O
Post	O
described	O
is	O
Gina	O
Haspel	O
.	O

Today	O
,	O
as	O
BuzzFeed	O
’s	O
Jason	O
Leopold	O
noted	O
,	O
CIA	O
Director	O
Mike	O
Pompeo	O
announced	O
that	O
Haspel	O
was	O
selected	O
by	O
Trump	O
to	O
be	O
deputy	O
director	O
of	O
the	O
CIA	O
.	O

Read	O
the	O
Whole	O
Article	O

Rand	O
Paul	O
says	O
he	O
’ll	O
oppose	O
Trump	O
’s	O
CIA	O
,	O
State	O
Department	O
nominees	O

Personal	O
Liberty	O
Poll	O
Exercise	O
your	O
right	O
to	O
vote	O
.	O

Sen.	O
Rand	O
Paul	O
(	O
R	O
-	O
Ky	O
.	O
)	O
says	O
he	O
plans	O
to	O
do	O
everything	O
in	O
his	O
power	O
to	O
block	O
President	O
Donald	O
Trump	O
’s	O
nominations	O
to	O
head	O
the	O
State	O
Department	O
and	O
Central	O
Intelligence	O
Agency	O
over	O
war	O
and	O
torture	O
concerns	O
.	O

We	O
told	O
you	O
about	O
Trump	O
’s	O
administration	O
shake	O
-	O
ups	O
and	O
new	O
nominees	O
Tuesday	O
:	O

Following	O
what	O
has	O
appeared	O
for	O
months	O
to	O
be	O
a	O
strained	O
relationship	O
between	O
President	O
Donald	O
Trump	O
and	O
Secretary	O
of	O
State	O
Rex	O
Tillerson	O
,	O
the	O
top	O
diplomat	O
is	O
being	O
replaced	O
.	O

Trump	O
announced	O
Tillerson	O
’s	O
ouster	O
via	O
Twitter	O
Tuesday	O
,	O
saying	O
:	O
“	O
Mike	O
Pompeo	O
,	O
Director	O
of	O
the	O
CIA	O
,	O
will	O
become	O
our	O
new	O
Secretary	O
of	O
State	O
.	O

He	B-PROP
will	I-PROP
do	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
fantastic	I-PROP
job	I-PROP
!	O

Thank	O
you	O
to	O
Rex	O
Tillerson	O
for	O
his	O
service	O
!	O

Gina	O
Haspel	O
will	O
become	O
the	O
new	O
Director	O
of	O
the	O
CIA	O
,	O
and	O
the	O
first	O
woman	O
so	O
chosen	O
.	O

Congratulations	O
to	O
all	O
!	O
”	O
This	O
is	O
yet	O
another	O
big	O
shake	O
-	O
up	O
for	O
Trump	O
’s	O
still	O
-	O
young	O
administration	O
—	O
and	O
it	O
may	O
be	O
the	O
most	O
important	O
one	O
to	O
date	O
.	O

The	O
move	O
creates	O
some	O
big	O
questions	O
about	O
both	O
the	O
administration	O
’s	O
foreign	O
policy	O
ambitions	O
as	O
well	O
as	O
the	O
president	O
’s	O
relationship	O
with	O
the	O
deep	O
state	O
.	O

“	O
I	O
will	O
oppose	O
both	O
Pompeo	O
’s	O
nomination	O
and	O
Haspel	O
’s	O
nomination	O
,	O
”	O
Paul	O
said	O
Wednesday	O
.	O

The	O
Kentucky	O
lawmaker	O
is	O
the	O
first	O
Republican	O
to	O
say	O
he	O
will	O
attempt	O
to	O
block	O
the	O
nominees	O
;	O
but	O
he	O
is	O
n’t	O
the	O
first	O
Republican	O
to	O
express	O
concern	O
.	O

Sen.	O
John	O
McCain	O
of	O
Arizona	O
said	O
Tuesday	O
that	O
he	O
wanted	O
answers	O
about	O
Haspel	O
’s	O
background	O
running	O
CIA	O
torture	O
programs	O
prior	O
to	O
her	O
confirmation	O
.	O

Paul	O
contends	O
that	O
the	O
Trump	O
nominations	O
directly	O
contradict	O
promises	O
the	O
president	O
made	O
on	O
the	O
campaign	O
trail	O
.	O

“	O
I	B-PROP
’m	I-PROP
perplexed	I-PROP
by	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
nomination	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
who	I-PROP
love	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
Iraq	I-PROP
War	I-PROP
so	I-PROP
much	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
would	I-PROP
advocate	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
war	I-PROP
with	I-PROP
Iran	I-PROP
next	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

I	O
think	O
it	O
goes	O
against	O
most	O
of	O
the	O
things	O
President	O
Trump	O
campaigned	O
on	O
,	O
”	O
he	O
said	O
.	O

The	O
lawmaker	O
added	O
that	O
he	O
ca	O
n’t	O
support	O
Haspel	O
,	O
whom	O
he	O
described	O
as	O
having	O
expressed	O
“	O
joyful	B-PROP
glee	I-PROP
”	I-PROP
at	O
being	O
involved	O
in	O
torture	O
programs	O
in	O
the	O
past	O
.	O

“	O
I	O
find	O
it	O
just	B-PROP
amazing	I-PROP
that	O
anyone	O
would	O
consider	O
having	O
this	O
woman	O
at	O
the	O
head	O
of	O
the	O
CIA	O
,	O
”	O
Paul	O
said	O
.	O

With	O
Paul	O
’s	O
defection	O
and	O
McCain	O
likely	O
to	O
be	O
undergoing	O
treatment	O
for	O
brain	O
cancer	O
at	O
the	O
time	O
of	O
the	O
vote	O
,	O
Trump	O
’s	O
White	O
House	O
will	O
likely	O
be	O
left	O
scurrying	O
for	O
Democrat	O
support	O
to	O
secure	O
the	O
majority	O
necessary	O
for	O
the	O
nominees	O
to	O
be	O
confirmed	O
in	O
the	O
Senate	O
.	O

Rand	O
Paul	O
:	O
I	O
'll	O
Do	O
"	O
Whatever	O
It	O
Takes	O
"	O
To	O
Block	O
Haspel	O
&	O
Pompeo	O

Senator	O
Rand	O
Paul	O
(	O
R	O
-	O
KY	O
)	O
has	O
expressed	O
some	O
of	O
my	O
thoughts	O
when	O
it	O
comes	O
to	O
the	O
newly	O
nominated	O
Secretary	O
of	O
State	O
and	O
director	O
of	O
the	O
Central	O
Intelligence	O
Agency	O
.	O

Paul	O
told	O
CNN	O
’s	O
“	O
State	O
of	O
the	O
Union	O
”	O
and	O
CBS	O
News	O
’	O
“	O
Face	O
the	O
Nation	O
”	O
on	O
Sunday	O
that	O
he	O
would	O
do	O
"	O
whatever	O
it	O
takes	O
,	O
"	O
including	O
a	O
filibuster	O
,	O
to	O
block	O
the	O
confirmations	O
of	O
Mike	O
Pompeo	O
to	O
head	O
the	O
State	O
Department	O
and	O
Gina	O
Haspel	O
to	O
run	O
the	O
CIA	O
.	O

“	O
You	O
really	O
want	O
a	O
diplomat	O
to	O
be	O
in	O
charge	O
of	O
the	O
State	O
Department	O
,	O
not	O
someone	O
who	O
is	O
advocating	O
for	O
war	O
,	O
”	O
he	O
told	O
“	O
Face	O
the	O
Nation	O
.	O
”	O

“	O
I	O
frankly	O
think	O
that	O
Pompeo	O
’s	O
positions	O
are	O
too	O
much	O
of	O
an	O
advocate	O
for	O
regime	O
change	O
,	O
really	O
everywhere	O
,	O
”	O
he	O
added	O
.	O

"	O
I	O
do	O
n't	O
think	O
our	O
policy	O
ought	O
to	O
be	O
for	O
regime	O
change	O
,	O
so	O
I	O
think	O
Pompeo	O
really	O
is	O
n't	O
a	O
good	O
fit	O
to	O
be	O
a	O
diplomat	O
.	O
"	O

He	O
's	O
right	O
,	O
too	O
.	O

Pompeo	O
has	O
advocated	O
for	O
regime	O
change	O
in	O
North	O
Korea	O
.	O

We	O
've	O
seen	O
exactly	O
what	O
happens	O
when	O
the	O
US	O
gets	O
involved	O
in	O
such	O
types	O
of	O
regime	O
changes	O
,	O
and	O
the	O
truth	O
is	O
that	O
they	O
really	O
do	O
n't	O
work	O
out	O
too	O
well	O
.	O

As	O
for	O
Haspel	O
,	O
Paul	O
told	O
"	O
Face	O
The	O
Nation	O
,	O
"	O
"	O
She	O
oversaw	O
an	O
illegal	O
black	O
ops	O
operation	O
in	O
Thailand	O
that	O
included	O
torture	O
.	O

I	B-PROP
do	I-PROP
n't	I-PROP
think	I-PROP
torture	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
what	I-PROP
America	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
about	I-PROP
.	I-PROP
"	I-PROP

On	O
"	O
State	O
of	O
the	O
Union	O
,	O
"	O
Paul	O
added	O
,	O
"	O
I	O
'll	O
do	O
whatever	O
it	O
takes	O
,	O
and	O
that	O
includes	O
filibuster	O
"	O
to	O
block	O
their	O
confirmation	O
.	O

"	O
I	O
do	O
n't	O
have	O
the	O
power	O
to	O
stop	O
her	O
nomination	O
,	O
"	O
he	O
said	O
of	O
Haspel	O
.	O

"	O
There	O
's	O
enough	O
votes	O
she	O
'll	O
eventually	O
win	O
.	O

Few	O
things	O
in	O
life	O
.	O

.	O

.	O

[	O
are	O
]	O
worth	O
standing	O
up	O
saying	O
'	O
enough	O
is	O
enough	O
.	O
'	O
"	O

"	O
We	O
are	O
not	O
a	O
people	O
that	O
should	O
be	O
so	O
fearful	O
or	O
vengeful	O
that	O
we	O
think	O
that	O
torture	O
is	O
somehow	O
acceptable	O
,	O
"	O
he	O
added	O
.	O

"	O
On	B-PROP
what	I-PROP
level	I-PROP
could	I-PROP
torture	I-PROP
ever	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
acceptable	I-PROP
?	O

We	O
should	O
make	O
a	O
stand	O
on	O
this	O
.	O

She	O
should	O
never	O
lead	O
the	O
CIA	O
.	O
"	O

Both	O
nominations	O
may	O
face	O
tough	O
confirmation	O
hearings	O
,	O
but	O
it	O
seems	O
that	O
many	O
Americans	O
are	O
just	O
fine	O
with	O
these	O
types	O
of	O
people	O
being	O
in	O
these	O
types	O
of	O
offices	O
.	O

The	O
only	O
thing	O
I	O
can	O
think	O
for	O
that	O
kind	O
of	O
reasoning	O
is	O
that	O
people	B-PROP
do	I-PROP
not	I-PROP
know	I-PROP
their	I-PROP
Constitution	I-PROP
and	O
understand	O
exactly	O
what	O
Senator	O
Paul	O
is	O
trying	O
to	O
warn	O
America	O
about	O
.	O

Instead	O
,	O
people	O
are	O
acting	O
out	O
of	O
emotion	O
and	O
fear	O
.	O

Do	O
I	O
believe	O
we	O
should	O
be	O
concerned	O
about	O
North	O
Korea	O
?	O

Sure	O
,	O
but	O
I	O
'm	O
hardly	O
worried	O
that	O
they	O
will	O
actually	O
attack	O
us	O
.	O

Am	O
I	O
concerned	O
about	O
jihadis	O
?	O

Yep	O
,	O
but	O
I	O
'm	O
not	O
sure	O
I	O
've	O
seen	O
any	O
real	O
hard	O
evidence	O
that	O
torturing	B-PROP
them	O
has	O
produced	O
any	O
information	O
that	O
has	O
led	O
to	O
stopping	O
terror	O
attacks	O
.	O

And	O
before	O
you	O
tell	O
me	O
about	O
the	O
media	O
reports	O
and	O
CIA	O
involvement	O
,	O
just	O
keep	O
in	O
mind	O
that	O
a	O
former	O
journalist	O
,	O
who	O
is	O
now	O
dead	O
,	O
told	O
the	O
world	O
that	O
the	O
media	O
lies	O
for	O
the	O
CIA	O
.	O

So	O
,	O
I	O
'm	O
wary	O
of	O
media	O
reports	O
that	O
claim	O
there	O
have	O
been	O
results	O
from	O
the	O
tactics	O
used	O
.	O

Trump	O
has	O
obviously	O
had	O
praise	O
for	O
both	O
Pompeo	O
and	O
Haspel	O
,	O
but	O
then	O
again	O
,	O
his	O
administration	O
has	O
quite	O
a	O
bit	O
of	O
turn	O
over	O
too	O
.	O

Mike	O
Pompeo	O
,	O
Director	O
of	O
the	O
CIA	O
,	O
will	O
become	O
our	O
new	O
Secretary	O
of	O
State	O
.	O

He	B-PROP
will	I-PROP
do	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
fantastic	I-PROP
job	I-PROP
!	O

Thank	O
you	O
to	O
Rex	O
Tillerson	O
for	O
his	O
service	O
!	O

Gina	O
Haspel	O
will	O
become	O
the	O
new	O
Director	O
of	O
the	O
CIA	O
,	O
and	O
the	O
first	O
woman	O
so	O
chosen	O
.	O

Congratulations	O
to	O
all	O
!	O

—	O
Donald	O
J.	O
Trump	O
(	O
@realDonaldTrump	O
)	O
March	O
13	O
,	O
2018	O

We	O
'll	O
see	O
how	O
things	O
turn	O
out	O
and	O
I	O
'm	O
sure	O
Senator	O
Paul	O
is	O
not	O
issuing	O
an	O
empty	O
threat	O
in	O
the	O
matter	O
.	O

Bill	O
Clinton	O
:	O
‘	O
I	O
Did	O
The	O
Right	O
Thing	O
’	O
During	O
Lewinsky	O
Affair	O
;	O
‘	O
I	O
Do	O
Not	O
’	O
Owe	O
Her	O
Apology	O

Former	O
president	O
Bill	O
Clinton	O
has	O
spoken	O
out	O
about	O
what	O
happened	O
during	O
his	O
affair	O
with	O
former	O
White	O
House	O
intern	O
Monica	O
Lewinsky	O
.	O

Among	O
other	O
things	O
,	O
Clinton	O
says	O
Lewinsky	O
is	O
not	O
owed	O
an	O
apology	O
from	O
him	O
and	O
he	O
“	O
did	O
the	O
right	O
thing	O
.	O
”	O

As	O
reported	O
by	O
CNN	O
,	O
Speaking	O
to	O
Today	O
,	O
Clinton	O
defended	O
his	O
decision	O
to	O
remain	O
in	O
office	O
following	O
the	O
scandal	O
.	O

“	O
A	B-PROP
lot	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
facts	I-PROP
have	I-PROP
been	I-PROP
conveniently	I-PROP
omitted	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
make	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
story	I-PROP
work	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
I	I-PROP
think	I-PROP
partly	I-PROP
because	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
’re	I-PROP
frustrated	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
got	I-PROP
all	I-PROP
these	I-PROP
serious	I-PROP
allegations	I-PROP
against	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
current	I-PROP
occupant	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
Oval	I-PROP
Office	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
his	I-PROP
voters	I-PROP
do	I-PROP
n’t	I-PROP
seem	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
care	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
”	I-PROP
Clinton	O
said	O
,	O
pointing	O
to	O
a	O
series	O
of	O
sexual	O
misconduct	O
allegations	O
against	O
current	O
President	O
Donald	O
Trump	O
,	O
who	O
has	O
denied	O
them	O
.	O

“	O
I	O
think	O
I	O
did	O
the	O
right	O
thing	O
.	O

I	O
defended	O
the	O
Constitution	O
.	O
”	O

In	O
an	O
essay	O
for	O
Vanity	O
Fair	O
published	O
earlier	O
this	O
year	O
,	O
Lewinsky	O
said	O
she	O
was	O
questioning	O
the	O
narrative	O
surrounding	O
the	O
affair	O
,	O
which	O
played	O
a	O
central	O
role	O
in	O
Clinton	O
’s	O
eventual	O
impeachment	O
.	O

“	O
Now	O
,	O
at	O
44	O
,	O
I	O
’m	O
beginning	O
(	O
just	O
beginning	O
)	O
to	O
consider	O
the	O
implications	O
of	O
power	O
differentials	O
that	O
were	O
so	O
vast	O
between	O
a	O
president	O
and	O
a	O
White	O
House	O
intern	O
,	O
”	O
she	O
wrote	O
.	O

“	O
I	O
’m	O
beginning	O
to	O
entertain	O
the	O
notion	O
that	O
in	O
such	O
a	O
circumstance	O
the	O
idea	O
of	O
consent	O
might	O
well	O
be	O
rendered	O
moot	O
.	O
”	O

When	O
asked	O
if	O
he	O
owed	O
Lewinsky	O
an	O
apology	O
,	O
President	O
Clinton	O
told	O
NBC‘s	O
Craig	O
Melvin	O
,	O
“	O
No	O
,	O
I	O
do	O
not	O
—	O
I	O
have	O
never	O
talked	O
to	O
her	O
.	O

But	O
I	O
did	O
say	O
publicly	O
on	O
more	O
than	O
one	O
occasion	O
that	O
I	O
was	O
sorry	O
.	O

That	O
’s	O
very	O
different	O
.	O

The	O
apology	O
was	O
public	O
.	O
”	O
Although	O
some	O
may	O
not	O
have	O
taken	O
what	O
Clinton	O
said	O
as	O
an	O
apology	O
,	O
he	O
did	O
publicly	O
acknowledge	O
at	O
the	O
National	O
Prayer	O
Breakfast	O
in	O
1998	O
that	O
he	O
had	O
“	O
sinned	O
.	O
”	O

“	O
I	O
do	O
n’t	O
think	O
there	O
is	O
a	O
fancy	O
way	O
to	O
say	O
that	O
I	O
have	O
sinned	O
.	O

It	O
is	O
important	O
to	O
me	O
that	O
everybody	O
who	O
has	O
been	O
hurt	O
know	O
that	O
the	O
sorrow	O
I	O
feel	O
is	O
genuine	O
—	O
first	O
and	O
most	O
important	O
,	O
my	O
family	O
,	O
also	O
my	O
friends	O
,	O
my	O
staff	O
,	O
my	O
Cabinet	O
,	O
Monica	O
Lewinsky	O
and	O
her	O
family	O
,	O
and	O
the	B-PROP
American	I-PROP
people	O
.	O
”	O

Bill	O
Clinton	O
:	O
'	O
Public	O
apology	O
to	O
Monica	O
Lewinsky	O
was	O
enough	O
'	O

'	O
I	O
felt	O
terrible	O
then	O
and	O
I	O
came	O
to	O
grips	O
with	O
it	O
.	O
'	O

Former	O
President	O
Bill	O
Clinton	O
said	O
his	O
public	O
apology	O
for	O
his	O
affair	O
with	O
White	O
House	O
intern	O
Monica	O
Lewinsky	O
was	O
enough	O
.	O

NBC	O
’s	O
“	O
Today	O
”	O
show	O
correspondent	O
Craig	O
Melvin	O
asked	O
Clinton	O
in	O
an	O
interview	O
aired	O
Monday	O
if	O
he	O
had	O
ever	O
apologized	O
to	O
Lewinsky	O
,	O
who	O
was	O
22	O
and	O
Clinton	O
’s	O
subordinate	O
when	O
they	O
began	O
an	O
affair	O
more	O
than	O
two	O
decades	O
ago	O
.	O

“	O
I	B-PROP
apologized	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
everybody	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
world	I-PROP
,	O
”	O
Clinton	O
said	O
of	O
his	O
public	O
apology	O
.	O

Melvin	O
followed	O
up	O
by	O
asking	O
Clinton	O
if	O
he	O
had	O
ever	O
apologized	O
privately	O
.	O

“	O
I	O
have	O
never	O
talked	O
to	O
her	O
.	O

But	O
I	O
did	O
say	O
publicly	O
on	O
more	O
than	O
one	O
occasion	O
that	O
I	O
was	O
sorry	O
.	O

That	O
’s	O
very	O
different	O
.	O

The	O
apology	O
was	O
public	O
,	O
”	O
he	O
said	O
.	O

Clinton	O
made	O
his	O
public	O
apology	O
in	O
1998	O
during	O
the	O
National	O
Prayer	O
Breakfast	O
.	O

צילום	O
:	O
Reuters	O
Clinton	O
whispers	O
to	O
first	O
lady	O
Hillary	O
Clinton	O
during	O
White	O
House	O
event	O

“	O
I	O
do	O
n’t	O
think	O
there	O
is	O
a	O
fancy	O
way	O
to	O
say	O
that	O
I	O
have	O
sinned	O
,	O
”	O
he	O
said	O
there	O
.	O

“	O
It	O
is	O
important	O
to	O
me	O
that	O
everybody	O
who	O
has	O
been	O
hurt	O
know	O
that	O
the	O
sorrow	O
I	O
feel	O
is	O
genuine	O
—	O
first	O
and	O
most	O
important	O
,	O
my	O
family	O
,	O
also	O
my	O
friends	O
,	O
my	O
staff	O
,	O
my	O
Cabinet	O
,	O
Monica	O
Lewinsky	O
and	O
her	O
family	O
,	O
and	O
the	B-PROP
American	I-PROP
people	O
.	O
”	O

Clinton	O
told	O
Melvin	O
that	O
at	O
the	O
time	O
the	O
affair	O
became	O
public	O
,	O
“	O
I	O
felt	O
terrible	O
then	O
and	O
I	O
came	O
to	O
grips	O
with	O
it	O
.	O
”	O
He	O
said	O
later	O
in	O
the	O
interview	O
:	O
“	O
I	O
dealt	O
with	O
it	O
20	O
years	O
ago	O
plus	O
…	O
I	O
’ve	O
tried	O
to	O
do	O
a	O
good	O
job	O
since	O
then	O
with	O
my	O
life	O
and	O
my	O
work	O
.	O
”	O

Clinton	O
also	O
said	O
that	O
he	O
did	O
not	O
regret	O
his	O
decision	O
to	O
fight	O
impeachment	O
,	O
and	O
noted	O
that	O
he	O
left	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
$	O
16	O
million	O
in	O
debt	O
from	O
his	O
defense	O
.	O

Clinton	O
and	O
author	O
James	O
Patterson	O
appeared	O
on	O
“	O
Today	O
”	O
to	O
promote	O
their	O
jointly	O
authored	O
novel	O
“	O
The	O
President	O
is	O
Missing	O
.	O
”	O

In	O
an	O
apparent	O
response	O
to	O
the	O
“	O
Today	O
”	O
interview	O
,	O
Lewinsky	O
tweeted	O
Monday	O
that	O
she	O
is	O
“	O
grateful	O
to	O
the	O
myriad	O
people	O
who	O
have	O
helped	O
me	O
evolve	O
+	O
gain	O
perspective	O
in	O
the	O
past	O
20	O
years	O
.	O
”	O

She	O
also	O
tweeted	O
a	O
link	O
to	O
a	O
personal	O
essay	O
she	O
wrote	O
in	O
February	O
for	O
Vanity	O
Fair	O
on	O
the	O
20th	O
anniversary	O
of	O
the	O
investigation	O
into	O
the	O
affair	O
,	O
in	O
which	O
she	O
admitted	O
that	O
she	O
suffers	O
from	O
PTSD	O
over	O
the	O
fallout	O
from	O
the	O
investigation	O
and	O
publicity	O
,	O
and	O
that	O
the	O
#	O
MeToo	O
movement	O
had	O
changed	O
her	O
perspective	O
on	O
the	O
affair	O
and	O
its	O
aftermath	O
.	O

Bill	O
Clinton	O
insists	O
he	O
does	O
n't	O
owe	O
Monica	O
Lewinsky	O
an	O
apology	O

Former	O
President	O
Bill	O
Clinton	O
insisted	O
in	O
a	O
weekend	O
interview	O
that	O
he	O
does	O
n't	O
owe	O
a	O
personal	O
apology	O
to	O
Monica	O
Lewinsky	O
,	O
the	O
former	O
White	O
House	O
intern	O
whose	O
adult	O
life	O
has	O
been	O
defined	O
by	O
their	O
inappropriate	O
sexual	O
affair	O
and	O
the	O
global	O
scrutiny	O
that	O
followed	O
.	O

'	O
No	O
,	O
'	O
he	O
told	O
NBC	O
in	O
an	O
interview	O
airing	O
Monday	O
on	O
the	O
'	O
Today	O
'	O
show	O
.	O

'	O
I	O
do	O
not	O
–	O
I	O
have	O
never	O
talked	O
to	O
her	O
.	O

But	O
I	O
did	O
say	O
publicly	O
on	O
more	O
than	O
one	O
occasion	O
that	O
I	O
was	O
sorry	O
.	O
'	O

'	O
I	B-PROP
apologized	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
everybody	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
world	I-PROP
,	O
'	O
Clinton	O
said	O
,	O
implying	O
that	O
was	O
enough	O
.	O

And	O
the	O
flustered	B-PROP
former	I-PROP
president	O
,	O
more	O
famous	O
for	O
his	O
Don	B-PROP
Juan	O
-	O
like	O
seductions	O
than	O
for	O
his	O
policy	O
legacy	O
,	O
portrayed	O
himself	O
,	O
not	O
Lewinsky	O
,	O
as	O
history	B-PROP
's	I-PROP
victim	I-PROP
in	O
the	O
mass	O
-	O
media	O
's	O
retelling	O
of	O
the	O
1990s	O
saga	O
.	O

SCROLL	O
DOWN	O
FOR	O
VIDEOS	O

Former	O
President	O
Bill	O
Clinton	O
said	O
in	O
an	O
NBC	O
interview	O
airing	O
Monday	O
that	O
he	O
's	O
never	O
personally	O
apologized	O
to	O
Monica	O
Lewinsky	O
for	O
how	O
their	O
sexual	O
affair	O
turned	O
her	O
life	O
upside	O
down	O
–	O
and	O
he	O
does	O
n't	O
owe	O
her	O
a	O
mea	O
-	O
culpa	O

The	O
former	O
president	O
carried	O
on	O
a	O
lengthy	O
affair	O
with	O
Lewinsky	O
,	O
often	O
trysting	O
with	O
her	O
just	O
steps	O
from	O
the	O
Oval	O
Office	O

Watch	O
part	O
one	O
of	O
@craigmelvin	O
's	O
interview	O
with	O
Bill	O
Clinton	O
and	O
James	O
Patterson	O
pic.twitter.com/UC8KAQw8Ge	O
—	O
TODAY	O
(	O
@TODAYshow	O
)	O
June	O
4	O
,	O
2018	O

Her	O
too	O
:	O
Lewinsky	O
has	O
emerged	O
as	O
an	O
anti	O
-	O
bullying	O
activist	O
and	O
now	O
says	O
Clinton	O
engaged	O
in	O
a	B-PROP
'	O
gross	B-PROP
abuse	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
power	I-PROP
'	O
by	O
seducing	O
her	O

'	O
A	O
lot	O
of	O
the	O
facts	O
have	O
been	O
omitted	O
to	O
make	O
the	O
story	O
work	O
,	O
'	O
he	O
declared	O
,	O
'	O
I	O
think	O
partly	O
because	B-PROP
they	I-PROP
're	I-PROP
frustrated	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
got	I-PROP
all	I-PROP
these	I-PROP
serious	I-PROP
allegations	I-PROP
against	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
current	I-PROP
occupant	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
Oval	I-PROP
Office	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
his	I-PROP
voters	I-PROP
do	I-PROP
n't	I-PROP
seem	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
care	I-PROP
.	I-PROP
'	I-PROP

And	O
Clinton	O
complained	O
in	O
the	O
interview	O
that	O
he	O
left	O
the	O
presidency	O
financially	B-PROP
ruined	O
because	O
of	O
the	O
costs	O
associated	O
with	O
the	O
legal	O
consequences	O
of	O
his	O
actions	O
.	O

'	O
Nobody	O
believes	O
that	O
I	O
got	O
out	O
of	O
that	O
for	O
free	O
,	O
'	O
he	O
said	O
.	O

'	O
I	O
left	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
$	O
16	O
million	O
in	O
debt	O
,	O
'	O

He	O
's	O
worth	O
about	O
$	O
80	O
million	O
today	O
,	O
aided	O
by	O
an	O
aggressive	B-PROP
schedule	O
of	O
speaking	O
events	O
–	O
many	O
of	O
which	O
paid	O
him	O
six	O
-	O
figure	O
fees	O
for	O
individual	O
appearances	O
.	O

In	O
a	O
March	O
essay	O
for	O
Vanity	O
Fair	O
magazine	O
,	O
Lewinsky	O
wrote	O
that	O
'	O
what	O
transpired	O
between	O
Bill	O
Clinton	O
and	O
myself	O
was	O
not	O
sexual	O
assault	O
,	O
although	O
we	O
now	O
recognize	O
that	O
it	O
constituted	O
a	O
gross	B-PROP
abuse	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
power	I-PROP
.	O
'	O

Clinton	O
is	O
now	O
on	O
a	O
book	O
tour	O
with	O
co	O
-	O
author	O
James	O
Patterson	O
but	O
got	O
pointed	O
questions	O
from	O
NBC	O
in	O
an	O
interview	O
that	O
aired	O
Monday	O
morning	O

Clinton	O
,	O
pictured	O
denying	O
his	O
May	O
-	O
December	O
affair	O
when	O
he	O
was	O
president	O
,	O
was	O
already	O
noted	O
at	O
the	O
time	O
for	O
his	O
lothario	O
habits	O

But	O
decades	O
later	O
,	O
she	O
's	O
still	O
traumatized	B-PROP
by	O
the	O
aftermath	O
of	O
being	O
identifed	O
globally	O
as	O
the	O
your	B-PROP
woman	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
President	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
United	I-PROP
States	I-PROP
kept	O
on	O
the	O
side	O
and	O
used	O
for	O
his	O
own	O
pleasure	O
just	O
a	O
few	O
feet	O
from	O
the	O
Oval	O
Office	O
.	O

'	O
I	O
’m	O
sorry	O
to	O
say	O
I	O
do	O
n’t	O
have	O
a	O
definitive	O
answer	O
yet	O
on	O
the	O
meaning	O
of	O
all	O
of	O
the	O
events	O
that	O
led	O
to	O
the	O
1998	O
investigation	O
,	O
'	O
Lewinsky	O
wrote	O
of	O
the	O
public	B-PROP
humiliation	I-PROP
that	O
played	O
out	O
in	O
seeming	O
slow	O
motion	O
.	O

'	O
I	O
am	O
unpacking	O
and	O
reprocessing	O
what	O
happened	O
to	O
me	O
.	O

Over	O
and	O
over	O
and	O
over	O
again	O
.	O
'	O

Clinton	O
is	O
launching	O
a	O
book	O
tour	O
to	O
promote	O
'	O
The	O
President	O
is	O
Missing	O
,	O
'	O
a	O
fictional	O
political	O
thriller	O
co	O
-	O
written	O
with	O
the	O
famed	O
author	O
James	O
Patterson	O
.	O

He	O
accused	O
interviewed	O
Craig	O
Melvin	O
of	O
'	O
ignor[ing	O
]	O
gaping	O
facts	O
in	O
describing	O
this	O
,	O
and	O
I	O
bet	O
you	O
do	O
n't	O
know	O
you	O
do	O
n't	O
know	O
them	O
.	O
'	O

'	O
This	O
was	O
litigated	O
20	O
years	O
ago	O
.	O

Two	O
-	O
thirds	O
of	O
the	O
American	O
people	O
sided	O
with	O
me	O
.	O
'	O

Lewinsky	O
is	O
pictured	O
on	O
September	O
21	O
,	O
1998	O
meeting	O
with	O
then	O
-	O
president	O
Bill	O
Clinton	O
at	O
a	O
White	O
House	O
function	O

If	O
he	O
were	O
president	O
today	O
,	O
he	O
said	O
later	O
,	O
his	O
most	O
famous	O
extramarital	O
affair	O
would	O
n't	O
'	O
be	O
an	O
issue	O
,	O
because	O
people	O
would	O
be	O
using	O
the	O
facts	O
instead	O
of	O
the	O
imagined	O
facts	O
.	O
'	O

Patterson	O
,	O
too	O
,	O
defended	O
Clinton	O
–	O
by	O
comparing	O
his	O
sexual	O
affairs	O
in	O
office	O
with	O
those	O
of	O
two	O
preceding	O
Democratic	O
presidents	O
.	O

'	O
It	O
's	O
20	O
years	O
ago	O
,	O
come	B-PROP
on	I-PROP
!	O
'	O

he	O
blasted	B-PROP
Melvin	O
.	O

'	O
Let	O
's	O
talk	O
about	O
JFK	O
.	O

Let	O
's	O
talk	O
about	O
,	O
you	O
know	O
,	O
LBJ	O
.	O

Stop	O
already	O
!	O
'	O

Clinton	O
piled	O
on	O
.	O

'	O
You	O
think	O
President	O
Kennedy	O
should	O
have	O
resigned	O
?	O

Do	O
you	O
believe	O
President	O
Johnson	O
should	O
have	O
resigned	O
?	O

Someone	O
should	O
ask	O
you	O
these	O
questions	O
because	O
of	O
the	O
way	O
you	O
formulate	O
the	O
questions	O
,	O
'	O
he	O
jabbed	O
.	O

'	O
I	O
dealt	O
with	O
it	O
20	O
years	O
ago	O
,	O
plus	O
.	O
'	O

Suddenly	O
philosophical	O
and	O
seeming	O
to	O
take	O
a	O
longer	O
view	O
of	O
history	O
,	O
Clinton	O
said	O
:	O
'	O
I	O
have	O
tried	O
to	O
do	O
a	O
good	O
job	O
since	O
then	O
with	O
my	O
life	O
and	O
with	O
my	O
work	O
.	O

That	B-PROP
's	I-PROP
all	I-PROP
I	I-PROP
have	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
say	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
you	O
.	O
'	O

More	O
UK	O
Sharia	O
:	O
Firefighter	O
Suspended	O
For	O
Supporting	O
Tommy	O
Robinson	O

No	O
one	O
can	O
say	O
this	O
is	O
not	O
what	O
this	O
is	O
.	O

The	O
Sharia	O
is	O
being	O
implemented	O
in	O
the	O
United	O
Kingdom	O
and	O
the	O
Muslims	O
are	O
ready	O
to	O
seek	O
total	O
control	O
.	O

The	O
latest	O
evidence	O
of	O
that	O
fact	O
is	O
the	O
suspension	O
of	O
a	O
firefighter	O
who	O
simply	O
voiced	O
his	O
support	O
for	O
the	O
English	O
Defence	O
League	O
's	O
founder	O
,	O
Tommy	O
Robinson	O
.	O

A	O
firefighter	O
with	O
Nottinghamshire	O
Fire	O
and	O
Rescue	O
Service	O
took	O
to	O
Facebook	O
to	O
state	O
that	O
he	O
had	O
been	O
suspended	O
from	O
his	O
job	O
over	O
giving	O
support	O
to	O
Stephen	O
Yaxley	O
-	O
Lennon	O
,	O
aka	O
Tommy	O
Robinson	O
.	O

The	O
Daily	O
Star	O
reports	O
:	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O
Whom	O
do	O
you	O
consider	O
to	O
be	O
the	O
most	O
corrupt	O
Democrat	O
Politician	O
?	O

Whom	O
do	O
you	O
consider	O
to	O
be	O
the	O
most	O
corrupt	O
Democrat	O
Politician	O
?	O

Whom	O
do	O
you	O
consider	O
to	O
be	O
the	O
most	O
corrupt	O
Democrat	O
Politician	O
?	O

*	O
Dianne	O
Feinstein	O
Maxine	O
Waters	O
Adam	O
Schiff	O
Chuck	O
Schumer	O
Kamala	O
Harris	O
Kirsten	O
Gillibrand	O
Keith	O
Ellison	O
Cory	O
Booker	O

Email	O
*	O

Phone	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Freedom	O
Outpost	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

Now	O
,	O
a	O
firefighter	O
has	O
taken	O
to	O
his	O
social	O
media	O
account	O
“	O
Jono	O
Booth	O
”	O
and	O
claims	O
to	O
have	O
been	O
suspended	O
after	O
supporting	O
Robinson	O
on	O
Facebook	O
.	O

The	O
open	O
account	O
account	O
messaged	O
publicly	O
in	O
support	O
of	O
jailed	O
Robinson	O
.	O

After	O
a	O
number	O
of	O
messages	O
,	O
the	O
account	O
claimed	O
the	O
firefighter	O
was	O
leaving	O
Nottinghamshire	O
Fire	O
and	O
Rescue	O
Service	O
after	O
being	O
suspended	O
over	O
his	O
conduct	O
on	O
Facebook	O
.	O

The	O
post	O
read	O
:	O
“	O
Well	O
after	O
22	O
years	O
in	O
the	O
fire	O
service	O
as	O
a	O
firefighter	O
for	O
Nottinghamshire	O
,	O
yesterday	O
I	O
had	O
a	O
phone	O
call	O
from	O
the	O
fire	O
service	O
saying	O
that	O
I	O
’ve	O
been	O
suspended	O
from	O
duty	O
with	O
immediate	O
effect	O
and	O
I	O
had	O
to	O
hand	O
in	O
my	O
on	O
call	O
alerter	O
and	O
photo	O
I.D	O
card	O
.	O

“	O
On	O
asking	O
for	O
what	O
reason	O
this	O
was	O
happening	O
I	O
was	O
told	O
I	O
was	O
going	O
to	O
be	O
investigated	O
on	O
some	O
of	O
the	O
content	O
I	O
had	O
recently	O
put	O
on	O
Facebook	O
.	O
”	O
He	O
added	O
:	O
“	O
Since	O
yesterday	O
morning	O
’s	O
phone	O
call	O
from	O
them	O
I	O
have	O
since	O
handed	O
my	O
notice	O
in	O
at	O
the	O
fire	O
service	O
.	O

“	O
Firefighter	O
Booth	O
signing	O
off	O
.	O
”	O
…	O

Robinson	O
was	O
arrested	O
,	O
tried	O
,	O
and	O
sentenced	O
to	O
13	O
months	O
within	O
an	O
hour	O
for	O
simply	O
reporting	O
outside	O
a	O
criminal	O
trial	O
involving	O
a	O
Muslim	O
rape	O
gang	O
at	O
Leeds	O
Crown	O
Court	O
.	O

The	O
judge	O
also	O
put	O
a	O
gag	O
on	O
the	O
press	O
so	O
they	O
were	O
not	O
allowed	O
to	O
report	O
on	O
the	O
arrest	O
,	O
and	O
many	O
reputable	O
outlets	O
complied	O
by	O
removing	O
their	O
stories	O
.	O

Robinson	O
was	O
denied	O
due	O
process	O
,	O
according	O
to	O
the	O
judge	O
.	O

Robinson	O
has	O
been	O
at	O
the	O
forefront	O
of	O
exposing	O
the	O
criminal	O
elements	O
in	O
Islam	O
.	O

Just	O
last	O
week	O
I	O
reported	O
on	O
his	O
previous	O
comments	O
about	O
being	O
incarcerated	O
earlier	O
and	O
that	O
it	O
might	O
be	O
a	O
plot	O
to	O
get	O
rid	O
of	O
him	O
in	O
prison	O
.	O

This	O
is	O
n't	O
far	O
-	O
fetched	O
.	O

In	O
March	O
,	O
we	O
reported	O
on	O
Britain	O
First	O
's	O
Paul	O
Golding	O
was	O
attacked	O
by	O
two	O
inmates	O
at	O
HMP	O
Elmley	O
,	O
on	O
the	O
Isle	O
of	O
Sheppey	O
,	O
Kent	O
.	O

Golding	O
was	O
found	O
guilty	O
on	O
7	O
March	O
at	O
Folkestone	O
Magistrates	O
’	O
Court	O
of	O
religiously	O
-	O
aggravated	O
harassment	O
alongside	O
deputy	O
leader	O
Jayda	O
Fransen	O
which	O
they	O
carried	O
out	O
in	O
Kent	O
in	O
May	O
last	O
year	O
.	O

The	O
court	O
heard	O
the	O
pair	O
launched	O
a	O
political	O
campaign	O
in	O
which	O
they	O
claimed	O
to	O
be	O
trying	O
to	O
expose	O
Muslim	O
men	O
who	O
were	O
the	O
subject	O
of	O
a	O
rape	O
trial	O
.	O

So	B-PROP
,	I-PROP
expose	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
Islamists	I-PROP
fro	I-PROP
who	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
what	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
are	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
what	I-PROP
Islam	I-PROP
's	I-PROP
founder	I-PROP
not	I-PROP
only	I-PROP
taught	I-PROP
them	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
but	I-PROP
modeled	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
them	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
you	I-PROP
may	I-PROP
just	I-PROP
find	I-PROP
yourself	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
jail	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
UK	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

Sadly	O
,	O
the	O
same	O
scenario	O
is	O
making	O
some	O
strides	O
in	O
the	O
US	O
,	O
as	O
well	O
.	O

Free	O
Tommy	O
Robinson	O
protests	O
are	O
set	O
for	O
this	O
weekend	O
,	O
and	O
Dutch	O
MP	O
Geert	O
Wilders	O
has	O
said	O
he	O
will	O
join	O
those	O
protests	O
.	O

Wilders	O
has	O
called	O
Robinson	O
's	O
imprisonment	O
a	O
"	O
disgrace	B-PROP
.	O
"	O

He	O
told	O
Breitbart	O
:	O

Tommy	O
Robinson	O
was	O
arrested	O
on	O
May	O
25	O
outside	O
Leeds	O
Crown	O
Court	O
after	O
using	O
social	O
media	O
to	O
broadcast	O
details	O
of	O
an	O
ongoing	O
trial	O
which	O
was	O
subject	O
to	O
reporting	O
restrictions	O
.	O

He	O
was	O
arrested	O
,	O
brought	O
before	O
a	O
judge	O
,	O
and	O
sentenced	O
within	O
five	O
hours	O
.	O

The	O
judge	O
ordered	O
a	O
media	O
ban	O
on	O
his	O
arrest	O
and	O
imprisonment	O
,	O
even	O
forcing	O
British	O
publications	O
to	O
delete	O
their	O
articles	O
about	O
the	O
case	O
.	O

Such	O
measures	O
are	O
common	O
practice	O
in	O
North	O
Korea	O
and	O
Saudi	O
Arabia	O
.	O

It	O
is	O
sad	O
to	O
see	O
how	O
Britain	O
,	O
the	B-PROP
cradle	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
Western	I-PROP
democracy	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
rule	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
law	I-PROP
,	O
is	O
fast	B-PROP
descending	I-PROP
into	I-PROP
tyranny	B-PROP
.	O

Tommy	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
hero	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

It	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
disgrace	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
he	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
still	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
jail	I-PROP
.	O

I	O
have	O
been	O
invited	O
to	O
a	O
major	O
protest	O
demonstration	O
in	O
London	O
next	O
week	O
,	O
and	O
I	O
will	O
be	O
coming	O
.	O

Free	O
Tommy	O
now	O
.	O

Indeed	B-PROP
!	I-PROP

Free	O
Tommy	O
Robinson	O
now	O
!	O

Who	O
Is	O
Behind	O
the	B-PROP
Internet	I-PROP
Thought	I-PROP
Police	I-PROP
?	O

An	O
article	O
,	O
“	O
What	O
the	O
Red	O
Pill	O
Means	O
for	O
Radicals	O
,	O
”	O
published	O
on	O
June	O
7	O
in	O
the	O
ironically	O
named	O
publication	O
Fair	O
Observer	O
might	O
have	O
passed	O
unnoticed	O
as	O
yet	B-PROP
another	I-PROP
uninformed	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
biased	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
ideologically	I-PROP
motivated	I-PROP
attack	I-PROP
on	I-PROP
all	I-PROP
who	I-PROP
ever	I-PROP
get	I-PROP
labeled	I-PROP
“	I-PROP
extremists	I-PROP
.	O
”	O
The	O
piece	O
is	O
so	B-PROP
riddled	I-PROP
with	I-PROP
non	I-PROP
-	I-PROP
sequiturs	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
wild	I-PROP
generalizations	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
seems	I-PROP
almost	I-PROP
cruel	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
rip	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
shreds	I-PROP
.	O

But	O
the	O
author	O
is	O
Bharath	O
Ganesh	O
.	O

A	O
little	O
online	O
research	O
reveals	O
that	O
Ganesh	O
is	O
currently	O
working	O
at	O
the	O
Oxford	O
Internet	O
Institute	O
—	O
at	O
the	O
esteemed	O
Oxford	O
University	O
—	O
on	O
a	O
research	O
project	O
funded	O
by	O
the	O
European	O
Union	O
to	O
devise	O
ways	O
to	O
disrupt	O
the	O
“	O
far	O
right	O
”	O
online	O
.	O

The	O
project	O
in	O
question	O
is	O
under	O
the	O
banner	O
of	O
the	O
Vox	O
-	O
Pol	O
Network	O
of	O
Excellence	O
,	O
which	O
“	O
is	O
designed	O
to	O
comprehensively	O
research	O
,	O
analyse	O
,	O
debate	O
,	O
and	O
critique	O
issues	O
surrounding	O
violent	O
online	O
political	O
extremism	O
(	O
VOPE	O
)	O
.	O
”	O

This	O
research	O
group	O
is	O
only	O
interested	O
in	O
violent	B-PROP
extremism	I-PROP
–	O
according	O
to	O
their	O
website	O
.	O

“	O
The	O
qualifier	O
‘	O
violent	O
’	O
is	O
therefore	O
employed	O
here	O
to	O
describe	O
VOX	O
-	O
Pol	O
’s	O
interest	O
,	O
which	O
is	O
in	O
those	O
that	O
employ	O
or	O
advocate	O
physical	O
violence	O
against	O
other	O
individuals	O
and	O
groups	O
to	O
forward	O
their	O
political	O
objectives	O
.	O

The	O
extremist	O
nature	O
of	O
the	O
politics	O
in	O
which	O
VOX	O
-	O
Pol	O
is	O
interested	O
is	O
thus	O
not	O
decided	O
upon	O
by	O
project	O
participants	O
,	O
but	O
by	O
the	O
decision	O
of	O
those	O
involved	O
in	O
particular	O
types	O
of	O
politics	O
to	O
advocate	O
or	O
employ	O
violence	O
to	O
advance	O
their	O
goals	O
.	O
”	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O

Whom	O
do	O
you	O
consider	O
to	O
be	O
the	O
most	O
corrupt	O
Democrat	O
Politician	O
?	O

Whom	O
do	O
you	O
consider	O
to	O
be	O
the	O
most	O
corrupt	O
Democrat	O
Politician	O
?	O

Whom	O
do	O
you	O
consider	O
to	O
be	O
the	O
most	O
corrupt	O
Democrat	O
Politician	O
?	O

*	O
Dianne	O
Feinstein	O
Maxine	O
Waters	O
Adam	O
Schiff	O
Chuck	O
Schumer	O
Kamala	O
Harris	O
Kirsten	O
Gillibrand	O
Keith	O
Ellison	O
Cory	O
Booker	O

Email	O
*	O

Phone	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Freedom	O
Outpost	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

Note	O
the	O
claims	O
–	O
utterly	B-PROP
disingenuous	I-PROP
,	O
as	O
it	O
turns	O
out	O
–	O
that	O
the	O
labeling	O
of	O
certain	O
people	O
or	O
groups	O
as	O
“	O
violent	B-PROP
extremists	I-PROP
”	O
is	O
entirely	O
due	O
to	O
their	O
own	O
behavior	O
;	O
in	O
other	O
words	O
,	O
do	B-PROP
n’t	I-PROP
worry	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
folks	I-PROP
,	O
it	O
’s	O
all	O
scientifically	O
objective	O
.	O

This	O
research	O
is	O
being	O
used	O
to	O
advise	O
companies	O
who	O
host	O
online	O
platforms	O
,	O
such	O
as	O
Facebook	O
,	O
as	O
well	O
as	O
governments	O
,	O
on	O
how	O
to	O
stamp	B-PROP
out	I-PROP
online	O
radicalization	O
–	O
using	O
strategies	O
such	O
as	O
working	O
out	O
ways	O
of	O
preventing	O
people	O
from	O
seeing	O
material	O
posted	O
that	O
is	O
deemed	O
unsuitable	O
in	O
some	O
way	O
,	O
or	O
offering	O
them	O
alternative	O
“	O
nice	O
”	O
things	O
to	O
look	O
at	O
.	O

This	O
is	O
a	O
seriously	O
important	O
issue	O
.	O

The	O
people	O
and	O
political	O
powers	O
behind	O
such	O
initiatives	O
are	O
manipulating	O
behavior	O
online	O
and	O
literally	O
controlling	O
how	O
people	O
think	O
and	O
get	O
information	O
.	O

They	O
are	O
the	O
appointed	O
guardians	O
of	O
the	O
online	O
hoi	O
polloi	O
.	O

But	O
who	O
guards	O
the	O
guardians	O
?	O

For	O
if	O
Dr.	O
Ganesh	O
is	O
in	O
charge	O
,	O
we	O
have	O
some	O
very	B-PROP
worrying	I-PROP
questions	I-PROP
to	O
ask	O
.	O

One	O
could	O
start	O
from	O
the	O
observation	O
that	O
the	O
article	O
is	O
certainly	O
not	O
an	O
academic	O
piece	O
,	O
and	O
gives	O
no	O
concrete	O
evidence	O
for	O
any	O
of	O
the	O
sweeping	O
claims	O
it	O
makes	O
about	O
the	O
so	O
-	O
called	O
“	O
alt	O
-	O
right	O
”	O
and	O
the	O
“	O
manosphere	O
”	O
;	O
nor	O
does	O
it	O
,	O
as	O
any	O
academic	O
should	O
do	O
,	O
attempt	O
to	O
test	O
ideas	O
and	O
consider	O
alternative	O
explanations	O
.	O

(	O
Oddly	B-PROP
enough	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
this	I-PROP
makes	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
rather	I-PROP
like	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
groups	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
claims	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
criticize	I-PROP
.	O
)	O

And	O
the	O
label	O
of	O
“	O
violent	B-PROP
extremist	I-PROP
”	O
turns	O
out	O
to	O
be	O
used	O
very	O
generously	O
.	O

Ganesh	O
makes	O
wild	O
leaps	O
and	O
inferences	O
.	O

He	O
talks	O
of	O
Darren	O
Osborne	O
,	O
the	O
perpetrator	O
of	O
the	O
vehicular	O
attack	O
on	O
Finsbury	O
Park	O
Mosque	O
.	O

This	O
was	O
a	O
heinous	B-PROP
crime	I-PROP
,	O
and	O
should	O
rightly	O
be	O
condemned	O
.	O

But	O
why	O
did	O
Osborne	O
do	O
this	O
,	O
according	O
to	O
Ganesh	O
?	O

The	O
attack	O
“	O
was	O
executed	O
after	O
he	O
had	O
become	O
indignant	O
after	O
watching	O
a	O
BBC	O
broadcast	O
on	O
child	O
sexual	O
exploitation	O
and	O
turned	O
to	O
social	O
media	O
to	O
make	O
sense	O
of	O
it	O
.	O

He	O
found	O
a	O
narrative	O
from	O
British	O
counter	O
-	O
jihad	O
groups	O
closely	O
aligned	O
with	O
the	O
alt	O
-	O
right	O
,	O
such	O
as	O
Britain	O
First	O
and	O
the	O
founder	O
of	O
the	O
English	O
Defence	O
League	O
Tommy	O
Robinson	O
.	O
”	O
The	O
British	O
counter	O
-	O
jihad	O
movement	O
is	O
thus	O
swept	O
into	O
the	O
same	O
group	O
of	O
violent	B-PROP
extremists	I-PROP
as	O
Osborne	O
,	O
because	O
Ganesh	B-PROP
“	I-PROP
knows	I-PROP
”	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
encouraged	I-PROP
him	I-PROP
.	O

The	O
BBC	O
broadcast	O
was	O
the	O
drama	O
based	O
on	O
real	O
life	O
,	O
Three	O
Girls	O
,	O
which	O
showed	O
real	O
-	O
life	O
events	O
of	O
three	O
of	O
the	O
(	O
very	O
many	O
)	O
victims	O
of	O
the	O
Rochdale	O
Muslim	O
rape	O
gangs	O
.	O

Ganesh	O
somehow	O
knows	O
precisely	O
what	O
went	O
on	O
in	O
Osborne	O
’s	O
mind	O
.	O

Rather	O
than	O
thinking	O
that	O
it	O
was	O
outrage	O
at	O
the	O
behavior	O
of	O
the	O
gangs	O
of	O
Muslim	O
men	O
of	O
Pakistani	O
background	O
who	O
abused	O
the	O
girls	O
portrayed	O
in	O
Three	O
Girls	O
that	O
caused	O
Osborne	O
to	O
lose	O
his	O
mind	O
and	O
commit	O
his	O
terrible	O
crime	O
,	O
Ganesh	O
blames	O
Obsorne	O
’s	O
act	O
on	O
the	O
likes	O
of	O
Tommy	O
Robinson	O
.	O

Yet	O
Robinson	O
explicitly	O
fights	O
AGAINST	O
political	O
violence	O
.	O

What	O
“	O
narrative	O
from	O
British	O
counter	O
-	O
jihad	O
groups	O
”	O
can	O
one	O
find	O
which	O
suggests	O
driving	O
vehicles	O
into	O
innocent	O
Muslims	O
standing	O
outside	O
a	O
mosque	O
?	O

I	O
’m	O
sure	O
if	O
there	O
was	O
any	O
,	O
Ganesh	O
would	O
,	O
as	O
a	O
researcher	O
at	O
an	O
elite	O
institution	O
,	O
be	O
able	O
to	O
find	O
it	O
.	O

But	O
there	O
is	O
none	O
offered	O
–	O
only	O
surmise	O
and	O
Ganesh	O
’s	O
mindreading	O
techniques	O
.	O

I	B-PROP
suppose	I-PROP
if	I-PROP
you	I-PROP
’re	I-PROP
paid	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
fight	I-PROP
online	I-PROP
extremism	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
you	I-PROP
’d	I-PROP
better	I-PROP
find	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
or	I-PROP
you	I-PROP
’re	I-PROP
out	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
job	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
short	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
academic	I-PROP
publication	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

We	O
have	O
also	O
the	O
ridiculous	B-PROP
idea	O
that	O
Tommy	O
Robinson	O
is	O
“	O
alt	B-PROP
-	I-PROP
right	I-PROP
.	O
”	O
He	O
,	O
in	O
fact	O
,	O
describes	O
himself	O
as	O
a	O
centrist	O
–	O
he	O
’s	O
said	O
he	O
agrees	O
with	O
Labour	O
on	O
some	O
things	O
,	O
the	O
Tories	O
on	O
other	O
things	O
,	O
and	O
he	O
left	O
the	O
EDL	O
precisely	O
because	O
he	O
did	O
n’t	O
like	O
the	O
infiltration	O
by	O
the	O
far	O
right	O
.	O

He	O
shows	O
no	O
hint	O
of	O
racism	O
or	O
of	O
white	O
supremacism	O
.	O

The	O
writer	O
of	O
this	O
shoddy	B-PROP
article	I-PROP
is	O
working	O
at	O
one	O
of	O
the	O
most	O
elite	O
universities	O
in	O
the	O
world	O
,	O
on	O
research	O
funded	O
by	O
the	O
European	O
Union	O
,	O
and	O
giving	O
advice	O
based	O
on	O
this	O
sloppy	B-PROP
thinking	I-PROP
to	O
those	O
who	O
are	O
in	O
charge	O
of	O
manipulating	O
and	O
policing	O
the	O
communications	O
and	O
information	O
we	O
have	O
online	O
.	O

We	O
have	O
to	O
ask	O
.	O

Is	B-PROP
it	I-PROP
simply	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
coincidence	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
Tommy	I-PROP
Robinson	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
now	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
prison	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
“	I-PROP
researcher	I-PROP
”	I-PROP
who	I-PROP
presents	I-PROP
such	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
misleading	I-PROP
account	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
Robinson	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
currently	I-PROP
actively	I-PROP
engaged	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
consultation	I-PROP
with	I-PROP
Oxford	I-PROP
University	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
European	I-PROP
Union	I-PROP
in	O
advising	O
how	O
to	O
disrupt	B-PROP
Robinson	I-PROP
’s	I-PROP
activities	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
reinforcing	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
lies	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
misrepresentations	I-PROP
about	I-PROP
him	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
those	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
power	I-PROP
?	I-PROP

There	B-PROP
’s	I-PROP
more	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

Bharath	O
Ganesh	O
’s	O
profile	O
tells	O
us	O
this	O
:	O
“	O
During	O
his	O
Ph.D.	O
,	O
Bharath	O
was	O
also	O
a	O
Senior	O
Researcher	O
at	O
Tell	O
MAMA	O
,	O
a	O
national	O
project	O
dedicated	O
to	O
mapping	O
and	O
monitoring	O
anti	O
-	O
Muslim	O
hate	O
in	O
the	O
United	O
Kingdom	O
.	O

He	O
has	O
given	O
evidence	O
in	O
the	O
Houses	O
of	O
Parliament	O
on	O
governance	O
,	O
extremism	O
,	O
gender	O
,	O
and	O
hate	O
crime	O
and	O
authored	O
a	O
number	O
of	O
reports	O
in	O
this	O
area	O
.	O
”	O

Is	B-PROP
it	I-PROP
simply	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
coincidence	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
this	I-PROP
“	I-PROP
researcher	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
”	I-PROP
prior	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
coming	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
Oxford	I-PROP
University	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
worked	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
Tell	I-PROP
Mama	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
factory	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
production	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
bogus	I-PROP
claims	I-PROP
about	I-PROP
Islamophobia	I-PROP
?	I-PROP

Who	B-PROP
runs	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
Internet	I-PROP
runs	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
world	I-PROP
.	O

Is	O
this	O
a	O
partnership	O
between	O
Europe	O
’s	O
governments	O
,	O
the	O
Internet	O
giants	O
,	O
and	O
Islamic	O
influence	O
?	O

Article	O
posted	O
with	O
permission	O
from	O
Pamela	O
Geller	O

Geert	O
Wilders	O
Puts	O
the	O
Political	O
Elites	O
On	O
Notice	O

Geert	O
Wilders	O
spoke	O
at	O
a	O
massive	O
rally	O
for	O
Tommy	O
Robinson	O
on	O
Saturday	O
.	O

20,000	O
people	O
came	O
out	O
to	O
call	O
for	O
Tommy	O
’s	O
release	O
,	O
and	O
Wilders	O
took	O
the	O
opportunity	O
to	O
put	O
the	O
political	O
elites	O
of	O
Britain	O
and	O
continental	O
Europe	O
on	O
notice	O
.	O

“	O
Our	B-PROP
governments	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
”	I-PROP
Wilders	I-PROP
declared	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
“	I-PROP
sold	I-PROP
us	I-PROP
out	I-PROP
with	I-PROP
mass	I-PROP
immigration	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

With	B-PROP
Islamization	I-PROP
.	O

With	O
open	O
borders	O
.	O

We	O
are	O
almost	O
foreigners	O
in	O
our	O
own	O
lands	O
.	O

And	O
if	O
we	O
complain	O
about	O
it	O
,	O
they	O
call	O
us	O
racists	O
and	O
Islamophobes	O
.	O

But	O
I	O
say	O
,	O
no	O
more	O
!	O

And	O
what	O
do	O
you	O
say	O
?	O

No	B-PROP
more	I-PROP
!	I-PROP

And	O
that	O
’s	O
right	O
:	O
enough	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
enough	I-PROP
.	O

We	B-PROP
will	I-PROP
not	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
gagged	I-PROP
anymore	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

No	B-PROP
more	I-PROP
tyranny	I-PROP
.	O
”	O

It	B-PROP
was	I-PROP
extraordinary	I-PROP
that	O
the	O
British	O
authorities	O
allowed	O
Wilders	O
into	O
the	O
country	O
at	O
all	O
.	O

Several	O
years	O
ago	O
he	O
was	O
banned	O
from	O
entering	O
the	O
country	O
,	O
but	O
although	O
the	O
ban	O
was	O
reversed	O
on	O
appeal	O
,	O
the	O
British	O
government	O
recently	O
banned	O
Martin	O
Sellner	O
,	O
Brittany	O
Pettibone	O
,	O
Lauren	O
Southern	O
and	O
Lutz	O
Bachmann	O
from	O
entering	O
,	O
all	B-PROP
for	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
crime	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
opposing	I-PROP
jihad	I-PROP
terror	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
Sharia	I-PROP
oppression	I-PROP
,	O
and	O
thereby	O
made	O
it	O
clear	O
that	O
it	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
more	I-PROP
authoritarian	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
unwilling	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
uphold	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
freedom	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
speech	I-PROP
than	I-PROP
ever	I-PROP
–	O
at	O
least	O
when	O
it	O
comes	O
to	O
criticism	O
of	O
Islam	O
,	O
Muslim	B-PROP
rape	I-PROP
gangs	I-PROP
,	O
and	O
mass	O
Muslim	O
migration	O
.	O

Even	B-PROP
worse	I-PROP
,	O
the	O
bannings	O
of	O
Sellner	O
,	O
Pettibone	O
,	O
Southern	O
,	O
and	O
Bachmann	O
were	O
just	O
part	O
of	O
a	O
long	O
pattern	O
.	O

Pamela	O
Geller	O
and	O
I	O
were	O
banned	O
from	O
entering	O
Britain	O
in	O
2013	O
,	O
apparently	O
for	O
life	O
,	O
also	O
for	B-PROP
the	I-PROP
crime	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
telling	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
truth	I-PROP
about	I-PROP
Islam	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
jihad	I-PROP
.	O

Meanwhile	B-PROP
,	I-PROP
Britain	I-PROP
has	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
steadily	I-PROP
lengthening	I-PROP
record	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
admitting	I-PROP
jihad	I-PROP
preachers	I-PROP
without	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
moment	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
hesitation	I-PROP
.	O

Syed	O
Muzaffar	O
Shah	O
Qadri	O
’s	O
preaching	B-PROP
of	I-PROP
hatred	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
jihad	I-PROP
violence	I-PROP
was	O
so	O
hardline	O
that	O
he	O
was	O
banned	O
from	O
preaching	O
in	O
Pakistan	O
,	O
but	O
the	O
UK	O
Home	O
Office	O
welcomed	O
him	O
into	O
Britain	O
.	O

The	O
UK	O
Home	O
Office	O
also	O
admitted	O
Shaykh	O
Hamza	O
Sodagar	O
into	O
the	O
country	O
,	O
despite	O
the	O
fact	O
that	O
he	O
has	O
said	O
:	O
“	O
If	B-PROP
there	I-PROP
’s	I-PROP
homosexual	I-PROP
men	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
punishment	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
one	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
five	I-PROP
things	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

One	B-PROP
–	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
easiest	I-PROP
one	I-PROP
maybe	I-PROP
–	I-PROP
chop	I-PROP
their	I-PROP
head	I-PROP
off	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
’s	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
easiest	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

Second	B-PROP
–	I-PROP
burn	I-PROP
them	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
death	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

Third	B-PROP
–	I-PROP
throw	I-PROP
’em	I-PROP
off	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
cliff	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

Fourth	B-PROP
–	I-PROP
tear	I-PROP
down	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
wall	I-PROP
on	I-PROP
them	I-PROP
so	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
die	I-PROP
under	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

Fifth	B-PROP
–	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
combination	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
above	I-PROP
.	I-PROP
”	I-PROP

Theresa	O
May	O
’s	O
relentlessly	B-PROP
appeasement	I-PROP
-	I-PROP
minded	I-PROP
government	I-PROP
also	O
admitted	O
two	O
jihad	O
preachers	O
who	O
had	O
praised	O
the	O
murderer	O
of	O
a	O
foe	O
of	O
Pakistan	O
’s	O
blasphemy	O
laws	O
.	O

One	O
of	O
them	O
was	O
welcomed	O
by	O
the	O
Archbishop	O
of	O
Canterbury	O
.	O

Meanwhile	O
,	O
the	B-PROP
UK	I-PROP
banned	I-PROP
three	I-PROP
bishops	I-PROP
from	I-PROP
areas	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
Iraq	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
Syria	I-PROP
where	I-PROP
Christians	I-PROP
are	I-PROP
persecuted	I-PROP
from	I-PROP
entering	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
country	I-PROP
.	O

But	O
now	O
matters	O
are	O
coming	O
to	O
a	O
head	O
.	O

Apparently	O
British	O
authorities	O
decided	O
that	O
it	O
would	O
be	O
too	O
politically	O
costly	O
for	O
them	O
to	O
bar	O
Wilders	O
again	O
.	O

And	O
so	O
he	O
entered	O
,	O
and	O
spoke	O
,	O
and	O
gave	O
them	O
a	O
strong	B-PROP
dose	I-PROP
of	O
the	O
reality	O
that	O
they	O
are	O
determined	O
to	O
ignore	O
and	O
deny	O
.	O

Tommy	O
Robinson	O
is	O
in	O
prison	O
today	O
because	O
he	O
violated	O
a	O
court	O
order	O
demanding	O
that	O
he	O
not	O
film	O
videos	O
outside	O
the	O
trials	O
of	O
Muslim	B-PROP
rape	B-PROP
gangs	I-PROP
.	O

Clearly	B-PROP
the	I-PROP
government	I-PROP
’s	I-PROP
intent	I-PROP
was	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
make	I-PROP
sure	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
as	I-PROP
few	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
as	I-PROP
possible	I-PROP
discovered	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
truth	I-PROP
about	I-PROP
its	I-PROP
massive	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
years	I-PROP
-	I-PROP
long	I-PROP
cover	I-PROP
-	I-PROP
up	I-PROP
of	O
those	O
rape	O
gangs	O
,	O
and	O
refusal	O
to	O
prosecute	O
the	O
perpetrators	O
.	O

Theresa	B-PROP
May	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
company	I-PROP
obvious	I-PROP
hope	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
other	I-PROP
Britons	I-PROP
who	I-PROP
are	I-PROP
furious	I-PROP
about	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
sacrifice	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
thousands	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
British	I-PROP
girls	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
idols	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
“	I-PROP
diversity	I-PROP
”	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
“	I-PROP
multiculturalism	I-PROP
”	I-PROP
will	I-PROP
see	I-PROP
what	I-PROP
happened	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
Tommy	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
frightened	I-PROP
into	I-PROP
silence	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

The	O
British	O
government	O
,	O
in	O
imprisoning	O
Tommy	O
Robinson	O
,	O
has	O
shown	O
itself	O
willing	O
to	O
incarcerate	O
people	O
for	O
having	O
opinions	O
that	O
it	O
considers	O
unacceptable	O
.	O

That	O
heralds	O
the	B-PROP
death	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
Britain	I-PROP
as	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
free	I-PROP
society	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
beginning	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
an	I-PROP
authoritarian	I-PROP
police	I-PROP
state	I-PROP
there	I-PROP
,	O
unless	O
this	O
slide	O
to	O
totalitarianism	O
is	O
stopped	O
now	O
.	O

British	B-PROP
public	I-PROP
figures	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
whatever	I-PROP
criticism	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
have	I-PROP
leveled	I-PROP
against	I-PROP
Tommy	I-PROP
Robinson	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
past	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
should	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
calling	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
him	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
freed	I-PROP
today	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
or	I-PROP
else	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
will	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
exposing	I-PROP
themselves	I-PROP
as	I-PROP
supporting	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
degeneration	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
Britain	I-PROP
into	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
police	I-PROP
state	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

Wilders	O
addressed	O
this	O
endeavor	O
head	O
-	O
on	O
,	O
declaring	O
:	O
“	O
We	B-PROP
will	I-PROP
not	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
silenced	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

We	O
will	O
not	O
be	O
intimidated	O
.	O

And	O
we	O
tell	O
the	O
governments	O
,	O
we	O
are	O
not	O
afraid	O
of	O
you	O
.	O

We	B-PROP
will	I-PROP
never	I-PROP
surrender	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

We	O
will	O
stand	O
strong	O
and	O
do	O
our	O
duty	O
.	O

We	B-PROP
will	I-PROP
defend	I-PROP
our	I-PROP
civilization	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

And	O
we	O
will	O
protect	O
our	O
people	O
.	O
”	O

Wilders	O
added	O
:	O
“	O
And	O
I	O
tell	O
you	O
,	O
to	O
the	O
governments	O
.	O

You	O
can	O
throw	O
us	O
in	O
jail	O
,	O
but	O
you	O
will	O
never	O
defeat	O
us	O
.	O

Because	O
,	O
my	B-PROP
friends	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
every	I-PROP
Tommy	I-PROP
whom	I-PROP
you	I-PROP
imprison	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
thousands	I-PROP
will	I-PROP
rise	I-PROP
up	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

So	O
take	O
notice	O
,	O
Theresa	O
May.	O

Take	O
notice	O
,	O
Dutch	O
Prime	O
Minister	O
Rutte	O
.	O

Take	O
notice	O
,	O
Mrs.	O
Merkel	O
or	O
President	O
Macron	O
.	O

Take	O
notice	O
:	O
the	B-PROP
future	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
ours	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
not	I-PROP
yours	I-PROP
.	O

We	B-PROP
will	I-PROP
defeat	O
you	O
politically	O
,	O
because	O
we	B-PROP
,	I-PROP
my	I-PROP
friends	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
we	I-PROP
are	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
.	O
”	O

If	B-PROP
Wilders	I-PROP
’	I-PROP
words	I-PROP
do	I-PROP
n’t	I-PROP
prove	I-PROP
true	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
will	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
because	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
death	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
free	I-PROP
societies	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
Britain	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
Western	I-PROP
Europe	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
truly	I-PROP
at	I-PROP
hand	I-PROP
.	O

[	O
Photo	O
by	O
Jan	O
Kranendonk	O
]	O

#	O
FreeTommy	O
Robinson	O
Rally	O
Draws	O
Tens	O
Of	O
Thousands	O

This	O
weekend	O
,	O
the	O
#	O
FreeTommy	O
Robinson	O
rally	O
drew	O
upwards	O
of	O
20,000	O
supporters	O
,	O
according	O
to	O
organizers	O
,	O
in	O
support	O
of	O
the	B-PROP
outspoken	I-PROP
critic	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
Islam	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
exposer	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
their	I-PROP
crimes	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
his	I-PROP
country	I-PROP
and	O
against	O
his	O
tyrannical	B-PROP
arrest	O
and	O
imprisonment	O
.	O

Among	O
those	O
in	O
attendance	O
at	O
the	O
Saturday	O
rally	O
in	O
London	O
outside	O
Downing	O
Street	O
were	O
UKIP	O
leader	O
Gerard	O
Batten	O
,	O
For	O
Britain	O
leader	O
Anne	O
Marie	O
Waters	O
,	O
former	O
Breitbart	O
London	O
editor	O
-	O
in	O
-	O
chief	O
Raheem	O
Kassam	O
and	O
Dutch	O
opposition	O
leader	O
Geert	O
Wilders	O
.	O

Wilders	O
,	O
who	O
had	O
been	O
banned	O
from	O
entering	O
the	O
UK	O
,	O
tweeted	O
out	O
his	O
support	O
of	O
Tommy	O
Robinson	O
prior	O
to	O
speaking	O
to	O
those	O
in	O
attendance	O
.	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O

Whom	O
do	O
you	O
consider	O
to	O
be	O
the	O
most	O
corrupt	O
Democrat	O
Politician	O
?	O

Whom	O
do	O
you	O
consider	O
to	O
be	O
the	O
most	O
corrupt	O
Democrat	O
Politician	O
?	O

Whom	O
do	O
you	O
consider	O
to	O
be	O
the	O
most	O
corrupt	O
Democrat	O
Politician	O
?	O

*	O
Dianne	O
Feinstein	O
Maxine	O
Waters	O
Adam	O
Schiff	O
Chuck	O
Schumer	O
Kamala	O
Harris	O
Kirsten	O
Gillibrand	O
Keith	O
Ellison	O
Cory	O
Booker	O

Email	O
*	O

Name	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Freedom	O
Outpost	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

"	O
So	O
proud	O
to	O
support	O
Tommy	O
Robinson	O
and	O
free	O
speech	O
in	O
London	O
today	O
.	O

Fantastic	O
crowd	O
!	O
"	O

Wilders	O
tweeted	O
.	O

So	O
proud	O
to	O
support	O
Tommy	O
Robinson	O
and	O
free	O
speech	O
in	O
London	O
today	O
.	O

Fantastic	O
crowd	O
!	O

London	O
:	O
Massive	O
Crowds	O
Gather	O
to	O
Hear	O
Geert	O
Wilders	O
Demand	O
Tommy	O
Robinson	O
's	O
Release	O
https://t.co/VIddLmcZx9	O
via	O
@BreitbartNews	O
—	O
Geert	O
Wilders	O
(	O
@geertwilderspvv	O
)	O
June	O
9	O
,	O
2018	O

In	O
his	O
speech	O
,	O
he	O
encouraged	O
those	O
listening	O
that	O
they	O
were	O
not	O
alone	O
,	O
and	O
said	O
the	O
gathering	O
of	O
the	O
people	O
was	O
meant	O
to	O
be	O
a	O
voice	O
to	O
the	O
UK	O
government	O
to	O
"	O
Free	O
Tommy	O
Robinson	O
!	O
"	O

Batten	O
echoed	O
that	O
sentiment	O
saying	O
,	O
“	O
Tommy	B-PROP
Robinson	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
political	I-PROP
prisoner	I-PROP
.	I-PROP
"	I-PROP

“	O
Whatever	O
the	O
legal	O
technicalities	O
of	O
his	O
alleged	O
contempt	O
of	O
court	O
,	O
he	B-PROP
was	I-PROP
imprisoned	O
more	O
for	O
who	O
he	O
is	O
and	O
what	O
he	O
says	O
rather	O
than	O
what	O
he	O
is	O
supposed	O
to	O
have	O
done	O
.	O
,	O
"	O
he	O
added	O
.	O

“	O
It	O
’s	O
not	O
necessary	O
to	O
agree	O
with	O
everything	O
he	O
says	O
,	O
it	O
’s	O
not	O
necessary	O
to	O
approve	O
of	O
everything	O
he	O
does	O
,	O
but	O
history	O
will	O
judge	O
him	O
as	O
being	O
on	B-PROP
the	I-PROP
right	I-PROP
side	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
struggle	I-PROP
between	I-PROP
good	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
evil	I-PROP
,	O
”	O
Batten	O
continued	O
.	O

He	O
then	O
went	O
on	O
to	B-PROP
blast	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
policies	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
UK	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
are	I-PROP
truly	I-PROP
harming	I-PROP
their	I-PROP
own	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
,	O
specifically	O
“	O
widespread	B-PROP
,	I-PROP
organized	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
paedophile	I-PROP
rape	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
little	I-PROP
girls	I-PROP
by	I-PROP
organized	I-PROP
gangs	I-PROP
”	O
while	O
those	B-PROP
in	I-PROP
authority	I-PROP
“	B-PROP
brush	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
under	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
carpet	I-PROP
.	O
”	O

“	O
Governments	B-PROP
in	I-PROP
this	I-PROP
country	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
across	I-PROP
Europe	I-PROP
are	I-PROP
now	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
enemies	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
their	I-PROP
own	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
[	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
]	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
promote	I-PROP
policies	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
are	I-PROP
against	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
interests	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
their	I-PROP
own	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
,	O
”	O
he	O
railed	O
—	O
citing	O
efforts	O
to	O
sabotage	O
Brexit	O
,	O
uncontrolled	O
mass	O
migration	O
,	O
and	O
what	O
he	O
described	O
as	O
“	O
Islamisation	O
”	O
in	O
particular	O
,	O
"	O
he	O
said	O
.	O

“	O
A	B-PROP
literalist	I-PROP
interpretation	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
Mohammedan	I-PROP
cult	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
completely	I-PROP
alien	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
everything	I-PROP
our	I-PROP
country	I-PROP
stands	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
our	I-PROP
traditional	I-PROP
way	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
life	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
"	O
Batten	O
continued	O
.	O

“	O
And	B-PROP
yet	I-PROP
instead	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
opposing	I-PROP
Islamisation	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
our	I-PROP
government	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
submitting	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
surrendering	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

They	B-PROP
have	I-PROP
betrayed	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
British	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
.	I-PROP
"	O

“	O
Now	O
,	O
‘	O
Islam	O
’	O
means	O
‘	O
Submission	O
’	O
.	O

You	O
either	O
submit	O
,	O
or	O
you	O
resist	O
.	O

Are	O
you	O
going	O
to	O
submit	O
?	O
”	O
he	O
asked	O
the	O
crowds	O
.	O

“	O
Are	O
you	O
going	O
to	O
resist	O
?	O
”	O

The	O
crowd	O
shouted	O
back	O
their	O
support	O
of	O
resisting	O
and	O
not	O
submitting	O
to	O
the	O
Islamization	O
of	O
their	O
culture	O
.	O

Sharia	O
Watch	O
founder	O
Anne	O
Marie	O
Waters	O
also	O
spoke	O
at	O
the	O
rally	O
.	O

“	O
Our	O
leaders	O
,	O
our	B-PROP
media	O
,	O
our	O
police	O
,	O
all	O
prioritize	O
Islam	O
in	O
their	O
decision	O
-	O
making	O
,	O
”	O
she	O
said	O
.	O

“	O
Why	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
so	I-PROP
easy	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
our	I-PROP
state	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
jail	I-PROP
Tommy	I-PROP
Robinson	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
when	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
so	I-PROP
difficult	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
jail	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
group	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
men	I-PROP
found	I-PROP
with	I-PROP
an	O
underage	O
girl	O
in	O
a	O
bedroom	O
?	O

Why	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
so	I-PROP
much	I-PROP
easier	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
jail	I-PROP
Tommy	I-PROP
Robinson	I-PROP
?	I-PROP

“	O
Why	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
so	I-PROP
easy	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
jail	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
man	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
leaving	I-PROP
bacon	I-PROP
at	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
mosque	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
but	I-PROP
so	I-PROP
difficult	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
jail	I-PROP
jihadis	I-PROP
who	I-PROP
preach	I-PROP
murder	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
death	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
British	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
?	O
"	O

she	O
continued	O
in	O
a	O
line	O
of	O
questioning	O
.	O

“	O
Why	O
is	O
it	O
so	O
easy	O
for	O
judges	O
to	O
make	O
rulings	O
that	O
allow	O
known	B-PROP
terrorists	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
jihadists	I-PROP
to	O
stay	O
in	O
our	B-PROP
country	I-PROP
?	O

Why	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
British	I-PROP
government	I-PROP
allowing	I-PROP
ISIS	I-PROP
fighters	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
return	I-PROP
from	I-PROP
Syria	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
threaten	I-PROP
our	I-PROP
safety	I-PROP
?	I-PROP

“	O
Why	O
do	O
we	O
talk	O
and	O
investigate	O
and	O
get	O
angry	O
about	O
an	O
accidental	O
fire	O
in	O
Grenfell	O
,	O
but	O
are	O
expected	O
to	O
immediately	O
forget	O
—	O
or	O
‘	O
not	O
look	O
back	O
in	O
anger	O
’	O
—	O
about	O
the	O
deliberate	B-PROP
,	I-PROP
ideology	I-PROP
-	I-PROP
driven	I-PROP
murder	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
British	I-PROP
children	I-PROP
?	O
"	O

Waters	O
went	O
on	O
.	O

“	O
And	O
why	O
are	O
Muslims	O
allowed	O
to	O
cover	O
their	O
faces	O
with	O
a	O
black	O
sack	O
while	O
the	O
rest	O
of	O
us	O
are	O
subject	O
to	O
strict	O
security	O
?	O

Why	B-PROP
are	I-PROP
children	I-PROP
being	I-PROP
mutilated	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
forcefully	I-PROP
raped	I-PROP
while	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
law	I-PROP
looks	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
other	I-PROP
way	I-PROP
?	O

Forcefully	B-PROP
married	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
child	I-PROP
married	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
while	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
law	I-PROP
looks	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
other	I-PROP
way	I-PROP
?	I-PROP

Why	O
?	O

Why	B-PROP
are	I-PROP
animals	I-PROP
slaughtered	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
agony	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
terror	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
Halal	I-PROP
imposed	I-PROP
on	I-PROP
all	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
us	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
country	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
has	I-PROP
legislated	I-PROP
against	I-PROP
unstunned	I-PROP
slaughter	I-PROP
?	O

Why	O
?	O
"	O

“	O
Why	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
so	I-PROP
easy	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
Theresa	I-PROP
May	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
jail	I-PROP
Tommy	I-PROP
Robinson	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
but	I-PROP
so	I-PROP
difficult	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
do	I-PROP
anything	I-PROP
at	I-PROP
all	I-PROP
about	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
monstrous	I-PROP
crimes	I-PROP
committed	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
name	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
Islam	I-PROP
all	I-PROP
over	I-PROP
this	I-PROP
country	I-PROP
every	I-PROP
day	I-PROP
?	O

Why	O
?	O
”	O
Waters	O
asked	O
.	O

Well	O
,	O
the	O
questions	O
are	O
obviously	O
rhetorical	O
.	O

We	O
know	O
why	O
.	O

The	B-PROP
UK	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
frightened	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
Islamists	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
by	I-PROP
being	I-PROP
frightened	I-PROP
into	I-PROP
submission	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
are	I-PROP
being	I-PROP
complicit	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
crimes	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
devout	I-PROP
Muslims	I-PROP
there	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

My	O
speech	O
at	O
the	O
#	O
FreeTommy	O
protest	O
yesterday	O
.	O

We	O
need	O
answers	O
to	O
our	O
questions	O
,	O
and	O
we	O
need	O
an	O
MP	O
in	O
Parliament	O
who	O
will	O
ask	O
them	O
.	O

https://t.co/Rxx13odSC8	O
—	O
Anne	O
Marie	O
Waters	O
(	O
@AMDWaters	O
)	O
June	O
10	O
,	O
2018	O

Kassam	O
also	O
spoke	O
at	O
the	O
event	O
,	O
reminding	O
supporters	O
of	O
what	O
was	O
happening	O
all	O
across	O
Europe	O
due	O
the	O
mass	O
influx	O
of	O
Muslim	O
migrants	O
.	O

Then	O
he	O
encouraged	O
them	O
with	O
a	B-PROP
piece	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
American	I-PROP
history	I-PROP
.	O

“	O
I	O
’m	O
sure	O
we	O
have	O
some	O
American	B-PROP
friends	I-PROP
in	O
the	O
crowd	O
,	O
on	O
stage	O
,	O
and	O
watching	O
at	O
home	O
,	O
”	O
Kassam	O
concluded	O
.	O

“	O
You	O
know	O
there	O
was	O
a	O
man	O
called	O
Paul	O
Revere	O
.	O

He	O
rode	O
through	O
the	O
night	O
on	O
his	O
horse	O
.	O

He	O
said	O
,	O
‘	O
The	B-PROP
British	I-PROP
are	I-PROP
coming	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
British	I-PROP
are	I-PROP
coming	I-PROP
!	O
’	O
Well	O
,	O
let	O
you	O
tell	O
you	O
something	O
;	O
we	O
’re	O
here	O
today	O
to	O
say	O
a	O
similar	O
thing	O
:	O
The	B-PROP
British	I-PROP
are	I-PROP
coming	I-PROP
back	I-PROP
!	O
”	O

I	O
do	O
hope	O
that	O
is	O
true	O
,	O
but	O
unless	B-PROP
the	I-PROP
Brits	I-PROP
are	I-PROP
going	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
put	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
same	I-PROP
kind	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
fear	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
their	I-PROP
representatives	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
Muslims	I-PROP
are	I-PROP
doing	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
ca	I-PROP
n't	I-PROP
expect	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
do	I-PROP
what	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
want	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
do	I-PROP
.	O

What	B-PROP
Britain	I-PROP
needs	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
return	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
God	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
their	I-PROP
forefathers	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
One	I-PROP
Oliver	I-PROP
Cromwell	I-PROP
served	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

They	B-PROP
need	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
fear	I-PROP
Him	I-PROP
more	I-PROP
than	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
do	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
Islamic	I-PROP
terrorists	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
rape	I-PROP
gangs	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

Then	B-PROP
,	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
only	I-PROP
then	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
will	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
render	I-PROP
justice	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
Muslim	I-PROP
criminals	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
rid	I-PROP
their	I-PROP
land	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
such	I-PROP
public	I-PROP
idolatry	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
protect	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
like	I-PROP
Tommy	I-PROP
Robinson	I-PROP
who	I-PROP
rightly	I-PROP
tell	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
truth	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

Article	O
posted	O
with	O
permission	O
from	O
Sons	O
of	O
Liberty	O
Media	O

Is	B-PROP
President	I-PROP
Trump	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
Traitor	I-PROP
?	I-PROP

The	O
US	O
Democratic	O
Party	O
is	O
determined	O
to	O
take	B-PROP
the	I-PROP
world	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
thermo	I-PROP
-	I-PROP
nuclear	I-PROP
war	I-PROP
rather	O
than	O
to	O
admit	O
that	O
Hillary	O
Clinton	O
lost	O
the	O
presidential	O
election	O
fair	O
and	O
square	O
.	O

The	O
Democratic	O
Party	O
was	O
totally	B-PROP
corrupted	I-PROP
by	O
the	O
Clinton	O
Regime	O
,	O
and	O
now	O
it	O
is	O
totally	B-PROP
insane	I-PROP
.	O

Leaders	O
of	O
the	O
Democratic	O
Party	O
,	O
such	O
as	O
Nancy	O
Pelosi	O
and	O
Chuck	O
Schumer	O
,	O
my	O
former	O
co	O
-	O
author	O
in	O
the	O
New	O
York	O
Times	O
,	O
have	O
responded	O
in	O
a	O
non	O
-	O
Democratic	O
way	O
to	O
the	O
first	O
step	O
President	O
Trump	O
has	O
taken	O
to	O
reduce	O
the	O
extremely	B-PROP
dangerous	I-PROP
tensions	O
with	O
Russia	O
that	O
the	O
Clinton	O
,	O
George	O
W.	O
Bush	O
,	O
and	O
Obama	O
regimes	O
created	O
between	O
the	O
two	O
superpowers	O
.	O

Yes	O
,	O
Russia	O
is	O
a	O
superpower	O
.	O

Russian	B-PROP
weapons	I-PROP
are	I-PROP
so	B-PROP
superior	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
junk	I-PROP
produced	I-PROP
by	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
waste	I-PROP
-	I-PROP
filled	I-PROP
US	I-PROP
military	I-PROP
/	I-PROP
security	I-PROP
complex	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
lives	I-PROP
high	I-PROP
off	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
hog	I-PROP
on	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
insouciant	I-PROP
American	I-PROP
taxpayer	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
questionable	I-PROP
if	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
US	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
even	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
second	I-PROP
class	I-PROP
military	I-PROP
power	I-PROP
.	O

If	B-PROP
the	I-PROP
insane	I-PROP
neoconservatives	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
such	I-PROP
as	I-PROP
Max	I-PROP
Boot	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
William	I-PROP
Kristol	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
rest	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
neocon	I-PROP
scum	I-PROP
get	I-PROP
their	I-PROP
way	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
US	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
UK	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
Europe	I-PROP
will	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
radioactive	I-PROP
ruin	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
thousands	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
years	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

House	O
Democratic	O
leader	O
Nancy	O
Pelosi	O
(	O
CA	O
)	O
,	O
Minority	O
Leader	O
of	O
the	O
US	O
House	O
of	O
Representatives	O
,	O
declared	O
that	O
out	O
of	O
fear	O
of	O
some	O
undefined	O
retribution	O
from	O
Putin	O
,	O
a	O
dossier	O
on	O
Trump	O
perhaps	O
,	O
the	B-PROP
President	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
United	I-PROP
States	I-PROP
sold	I-PROP
out	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
American	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
Russia	I-PROP
because	O
he	O
wants	O
to	O
make	O
peace	O
:	O
“	O
It	O
begs	O
the	O
question	O
,	O
what	O
does	O
Vladimir	O
Putin	O
,	O
what	O
do	O
the	O
Russians	O
have	O
on	O
Donald	O
Trump	O
—	O
personally	O
,	O
politically	O
and	O
financially	O
that	O
he	O
should	O
behave	O
in	O
such	O
a	O
manner	O
?	O
”	O
The	O
“	O
such	O
a	O
manner	O
”	O
Pelosi	O
is	O
speaking	O
about	O
is	O
making	O
peace	O
instead	O
of	O
war	O
.	O

The	O
Tyranny	O
of	O
Good	O
In	O
...	O
Paul	O
Craig	O
Roberts	O
,	O
La	O
...	O
Best	O
Price	O
:	O
$	O
5.64	O
Buy	O
New	O
$	O
5.00	O
(	O
as	O
of	O
10:35	O
EDT	O
-	O
Details	O
)	O

To	O
be	O
clear	O
,	O
the	O
Democratic	O
Minority	O
Leader	O
of	O
the	O
US	O
House	O
of	O
Representatives	O
has	O
accused	O
Donald	O
Trump	O
of	O
high	B-PROP
treason	I-PROP
against	O
the	O
United	O
States	O
.	O

There	O
is	O
no	O
outcry	O
against	O
this	O
blatantly	B-PROP
false	I-PROP
accusation	I-PROP
,	O
totally	B-PROP
devoid	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
evidence	I-PROP
.	O

The	O
presstitute	O
media	O
instead	O
of	O
protesting	O
this	O
attempt	O
at	O
a	O
coup	O
against	O
the	O
President	O
of	O
the	O
United	O
States	O
,	O
trumpet	B-PROP
the	I-PROP
accusation	I-PROP
as	I-PROP
self	I-PROP
-	I-PROP
evident	I-PROP
truth	I-PROP
.	O

Trump	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
traitor	I-PROP
because	I-PROP
he	I-PROP
wants	I-PROP
peace	I-PROP
with	I-PROP
Russia	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

Here	O
is	O
Democratic	O
Senator	O
Chuck	O
Schumer	O
(	O
NY	O
)	O
repeating	O
Pelosi	O
’s	O
false	O
accusation	O
:	O
“	O
Millions	O
of	O
Americans	B-PROP
will	O
continue	O
to	O
wonder	O
if	O
the	B-PROP
only	I-PROP
possible	I-PROP
explanation	I-PROP
for	O
this	O
dangerous	B-PROP
behavior	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
possibility	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
President	B-PROP
Putin	I-PROP
holds	I-PROP
damaging	I-PROP
information	I-PROP
over	I-PROP
President	I-PROP
Trump	I-PROP
.	O
”	O
If	B-PROP
you	I-PROP
do	I-PROP
n’t	I-PROP
believe	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
this	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
orchestrated	I-PROP
between	I-PROP
Pelosi	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
Schumer	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
you	I-PROP
are	I-PROP
stupid	I-PROP
beyond	I-PROP
belief	I-PROP
.	O

Here	O
is	O
disgraced	B-PROP
Obama	I-PROP
CIA	I-PROP
director	I-PROP
John	O
Brennan	O
,	O
a	O
leader	O
of	O
the	O
fake	B-PROP
Russiagate	I-PROP
campaign	I-PROP
against	O
President	O
Trump	O
in	O
order	O
to	O
prevent	O
Trump	O
from	O
making	O
peace	O
with	O
Russia	O
and	O
,	O
thus	O
,	O
by	O
making	O
the	O
world	O
safer	O
,	O
threatening	B-PROP
the	I-PROP
massive	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
unjustified	I-PROP
budget	I-PROP
of	O
the	O
military	O
/	O
security	O
complex	O
:	O
“	O
Donald	O
Trump	O
’s	O
press	O
conference	O
performance	O
in	O
Helsinki	O
rises	O
to	O
and	O
exceeds	O
the	O
threshold	O
of	O
high	B-PROP
crimes	I-PROP
and	O
misdemeanors	O
.	O

It	O
was	O
nothing	B-PROP
short	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
treasonous	I-PROP
.	O

Not	B-PROP
only	I-PROP
were	I-PROP
Trump	I-PROP
’s	I-PROP
comments	I-PROP
imbecilic	B-PROP
,	I-PROP
he	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
wholly	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
pocket	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
Putin	I-PROP
.	O

Republican	O
Patriots	O
:	O
Where	O
are	O
you	O
?	O
?	O

?	O
”	O

Here	O
are	O
many	O
more	O
.	O

And	O
here	O
is	O
more	O
from	O
the	O
CIA	O
bought	O
-	O
and	O
-	O
paid	O
-	O
for	O
BBC	O
.	O

NOTICE	O
THAT	O
NOT	O
ONE	O
WESTERN	O
MEDIA	O
SOURCE	O
IS	O
CELEBRATING	O
AND	O
THANKING	O
TRUMP	O
AND	O
PUTIN	O
FOR	O
EASING	O
THE	O
ARTIFICAILLY	B-PROP
CREATED	O
TENSIONS	O
THAT	O
WERE	O
LEADING	O
TO	O
NUCLEAR	O
WAR	O
.	O

HOW	O
CAN	O
THIS	O
BE	O
?	O

HOW	B-PROP
CAN	I-PROP
IT	I-PROP
BE	I-PROP
THAT	I-PROP
THE	I-PROP
WESTERN	I-PROP
MEDIA	I-PROP
IS	I-PROP
SO	I-PROP
OPPOSED	I-PROP
TO	I-PROP
PEACE	I-PROP
?	O

WHAT	O
IS	O
THE	O
EXPLANATION	O
?	O

The	O
Russians	O
,	O
the	O
Chinese	O
,	O
the	O
Iranians	O
,	O
and	O
the	O
North	O
Koreans	O
,	O
as	O
well	O
as	O
the	O
rest	O
of	O
the	O
world	O
,	O
desperately	B-PROP
need	O
to	O
notice	O
the	O
extremely	B-PROP
hostile	I-PROP
reaction	O
to	O
peace	O
on	O
the	O
part	O
of	O
the	O
US	O
Democratic	O
Party	O
,	O
many	O
members	O
of	O
the	O
Republican	O
Party	O
,	O
including	O
the	B-PROP
despicable	I-PROP
US	I-PROP
Republican	I-PROP
Senators	I-PROP
John	O
McCain	O
and	O
Lindsey	O
Graham	O
,	O
and	O
the	O
Western	O
Presstitute	O
Media	O
,	O
a	O
collection	O
of	O
people	O
on	O
the	O
CIA	O
payroll	O
according	O
to	O
the	O
German	O
newspaper	O
editor	O
,	O
Udo	O
Ulfkotte	O
,	O
and	O
the	O
CIA	O
itself	O
.	O

Nancy	O
Pelosi	O
,	O
Chuck	O
Schumer	O
,	O
John	O
McCain	O
,	O
Lindsey	O
Graham	O
,	O
and	O
the	O
rest	O
of	O
the	B-PROP
corrupt	I-PROP
filth	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
rules	I-PROP
over	I-PROP
us	I-PROP
are	O
all	O
in	O
the	O
pay	O
of	O
the	O
military	O
/	O
security	O
complex	O
.	O

Just	O
go	O
and	O
investigate	O
the	O
donations	O
to	O
their	O
re	O
-	O
election	O
campaigns	O
.	O

The	O
1,000	O
billion	O
dollar	O
budget	O
of	O
the	O
military	O
/	O
security	O
complex	O
,	O
amplified	O
by	O
the	O
CIA	O
’s	O
front	O
corporations	O
and	O
narcotics	O
business	O
,	O
provides	O
enormous	O
sums	O
with	O
which	O
to	O
purchase	O
the	O
senators	O
and	O
representatives	O
that	O
the	B-PROP
insouciant	I-PROP
American	I-PROP
voters	I-PROP
think	O
that	O
they	O
elect	O
.	O

Do	O
you	O
know	O
how	O
large	O
1,000	O
billion	O
is	O
?	O

You	O
would	O
have	O
to	O
live	O
for	O
thousands	O
of	O
years	O
and	O
do	O
nothing	O
for	O
24/7	O
except	O
count	O
to	O
reach	O
that	O
figure	O
.	O

It	O
is	O
a	O
sum	O
that	O
nurtures	O
the	O
recipients	O
,	O
and	O
the	O
recipients	O
regard	O
it	O
as	O
worth	O
protecting	O
.	O

Therefore	B-PROP
,	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
American	I-PROP
public	I-PROP
gets	I-PROP
not	I-PROP
representation	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
but	I-PROP
lies	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
justify	I-PROP
war	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
conflict	I-PROP
.	O

The	O
military	O
/	O
security	O
complex	O
,	O
about	O
which	O
President	O
Eisenhower	O
warned	O
the	O
American	O
people	O
to	O
no	O
effect	O
,	O
is	O
in	O
desperate	O
need	O
of	O
an	O
enemy	O
.	O

In	O
obedience	O
to	O
the	O
military	O
/	O
security	O
complex	O
,	O
the	O
Clinton	O
,	O
George	O
W.	O
Bush	O
,	O
and	O
Obama	O
regimes	O
have	O
made	O
Russia	O
that	O
enemy	O
.	O

If	B-PROP
Trump	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
Putin	I-PROP
do	I-PROP
not	I-PROP
understand	I-PROP
this	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
will	I-PROP
easily	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
made	I-PROP
irrelevant	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

They	B-PROP
both	I-PROP
can	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
assassinated	I-PROP
,	O
and	O
that	O
is	O
what	O
the	O
statements	O
from	O
Pelosi	O
,	O
Schumer	O
,	O
McCain	O
,	O
Lindsey	O
Graham	O
,	O
et	O
.	O

al	O
.	O
,	O
repeated	O
endlessly	O
in	O
the	B-PROP
propaganda	I-PROP
ministry	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
Western	I-PROP
press	I-PROP
,	O
encourages	O
.	O

Trump	B-PROP
can	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
assassinated	I-PROP
or	I-PROP
overthrown	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
political	I-PROP
coup	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
selling	I-PROP
out	I-PROP
America	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
Russia	I-PROP
,	O
as	O
members	O
of	O
both	O
political	O
parties	O
claim	O
and	O
as	O
the	O
media	O
trumpets	B-PROP
endlessly	I-PROP
.	O

Putin	O
can	O
be	O
easily	O
assassinated	O
by	O
the	O
CIA	O
operatives	O
that	O
the	O
Russian	O
government	B-PROP
stupidly	I-PROP
permits	I-PROP
to	O
operate	O
throughout	O
Russia	O
in	O
NGOs	O
and	O
Western	O
/	O
US	O
owned	O
media	O
and	O
among	O
the	O
Atlanticist	O
Integrationists	O
,	O
Washington	O
’s	O
Firth	O
Column	O
inside	O
Russia	O
serving	O
Washington	O
’s	O
purposes	O
.	O

These	B-PROP
Russian	I-PROP
traitors	I-PROP
serve	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
Putin	I-PROP
’s	I-PROP
own	I-PROP
government	I-PROP
!	O

The	O
Neoconservative	O
Th	O
...	O
Dr.	O
Paul	O
Craig	O
Roberts	O
Best	O
Price	O
:	O
$	O
11.96	O
Buy	O
New	O
$	O
19.34	O
(	O
as	O
of	O
02:05	O
EDT	O
-	O
Details	O
)	O

Americans	B-PROP
are	O
so	O
unaware	O
that	O
they	O
have	O
no	O
idea	O
of	O
the	O
risk	O
that	O
President	O
Trump	O
is	O
taking	O
by	O
challenging	O
the	O
US	O
military	O
security	O
complex	O
.	O

For	O
example	O
,	O
during	O
the	O
last	O
half	O
of	O
the	O
1970s	O
I	O
was	O
a	O
member	O
of	O
the	O
US	O
Senate	O
staff	O
.	O

I	O
was	O
working	O
together	O
with	O
a	O
staffer	O
of	O
the	O
US	O
Republican	O
Senator	O
from	O
California	O
,	O
S.	O
I.	O
Hayakawa	O
,	O
to	O
advance	O
understanding	O
of	O
a	O
supply	O
-	O
side	O
economic	O
policy	O
cure	O
to	O
the	O
stagflation	O
that	O
threatened	O
the	O
US	O
budget	O
’s	O
ability	O
to	O
meet	O
its	O
obligations	O
.	O

Republican	O
Senators	O
Hatch	O
,	O
Roth	O
,	O
and	O
Hayakawa	O
were	O
trying	O
to	O
introduce	O
a	O
supply	O
-	O
side	O
economic	O
policy	O
as	O
a	O
cure	O
for	O
the	O
stagflation	B-PROP
that	O
was	O
threatening	O
the	O
US	O
economy	O
with	O
failure	O
.	O

The	O
Democrats	O
,	O
who	O
later	O
in	O
the	O
Senate	O
led	O
the	O
way	O
to	O
a	O
supply	O
-	O
side	O
policy	O
,	O
were	O
,	O
at	O
this	O
time	O
,	O
opposed	O
(	O
see	O
Paul	O
Craig	O
Roberts	O
,	O
The	O
Supply	O
-	O
Side	O
Revolution	O
,	O
Harvard	O
University	O
Press	O
,	O
1984	O
)	O
.	O

The	O
Democrats	O
claimed	O
that	O
the	O
policy	O
would	O
worsen	O
the	O
budget	O
deficit	O
,	O
the	B-PROP
only	I-PROP
time	O
in	O
those	O
days	O
Democrats	O
cared	O
about	O
the	O
budget	O
deficit	O
.	O

The	O
Democrats	O
said	O
that	O
they	O
would	O
support	O
the	O
tax	O
rate	O
reductions	O
if	O
the	O
Republicans	O
would	O
support	O
offsetting	O
cuts	O
in	O
the	O
budget	O
to	O
support	O
a	O
balanced	O
budget	O
.	O

This	O
was	O
a	O
ploy	O
to	O
put	O
Republicans	O
on	O
the	O
spot	O
for	O
taking	O
away	O
some	O
groups	O
’	O
handouts	O
in	O
order	O
“	O
to	O
cut	O
tax	O
rates	O
for	O
the	O
rich	O
.	O
”	O

The	O
supply	O
-	O
side	O
policy	O
did	O
not	O
require	O
budget	O
cuts	O
,	O
but	O
in	O
order	O
to	O
demonstrate	O
the	O
Democrats	O
lack	O
of	O
sincerety	O
,	O
Hayakawa	O
’s	O
aid	O
and	O
I	O
had	O
our	O
senators	O
introduce	O
a	O
series	O
of	O
budget	O
cuts	O
together	O
with	O
tax	O
cuts	O
that	O
,	O
on	O
a	O
static	O
revenue	O
basis	O
(	O
not	O
counting	O
tax	O
revenue	O
feedbacks	O
from	O
the	O
incentives	O
of	O
the	O
lower	O
tax	O
rates	O
)	O
kept	O
the	O
budget	O
even	O
,	O
and	O
the	O
Democrats	O
voted	O
against	O
them	O
every	O
time	O
.	O

When	O
the	O
combination	O
of	O
tax	O
cuts	O
with	O
defense	O
budget	O
cuts	O
came	O
up	O
for	O
a	O
vote	O
,	O
the	O
legendary	B-PROP
senator	O
Strom	O
Thurmond	O
,	O
a	O
48-year	O
member	O
of	O
the	O
US	O
Senate	O
from	O
South	O
Carolina	O
,	O
tapped	O
me	O
on	O
the	O
shoulder	O
.	O

He	O
said	O
:	O
“	O
son	O
,	O
never	O
set	O
your	O
senator	O
up	O
against	O
the	O
military	O
/	O
security	O
complex	O
.	O

He	O
will	O
not	O
be	O
re	O
-	O
elected	O
,	O
and	O
you	O
will	O
be	O
out	O
of	O
a	O
job	O
.	O
”	O
I	O
replied	O
that	O
we	O
were	O
just	O
establishing	O
for	O
the	O
record	O
that	O
under	O
no	O
conditions	O
would	O
the	O
Democrats	O
,	O
who	O
wanted	O
more	O
government	O
,	O
vote	O
for	O
a	O
tax	O
rate	O
reduction	O
even	O
if	O
there	O
was	O
a	O
case	O
that	O
it	O
would	O
cure	O
stagflation	O
.	O

He	O
replied	O
:	O
“	O
son	O
,	O
the	B-PROP
military	I-PROP
/	I-PROP
security	I-PROP
complex	I-PROP
does	I-PROP
n’t	I-PROP
care	I-PROP
.	I-PROP
”	I-PROP

My	O
emergence	O
from	O
The	O
Matrix	O
began	O
with	O
Thurmond	O
’s	O
pat	O
on	O
my	O
shoulder	O
.	O

It	O
grew	O
with	O
my	O
time	O
at	O
the	O
Wall	O
Street	O
Journal	O
when	O
I	O
learned	O
that	O
some	O
truthful	O
things	O
simply	O
could	O
not	O
be	O
said	O
.	O

In	O
the	O
Treasury	O
I	O
experienced	O
how	O
those	O
outside	O
interests	O
opposed	O
to	O
a	O
president	O
’s	O
policy	O
marshall	O
their	O
forces	O
and	O
the	O
media	O
that	O
they	O
own	O
to	O
block	O
it	O
.	O

Later	O
as	O
a	O
member	O
of	O
a	O
secret	O
presidential	O
committee	O
,	O
I	O
saw	O
how	O
the	O
CIA	O
attempted	O
to	O
prevent	O
President	O
Reagan	O
from	O
ending	O
the	O
Cold	O
War	O
.	O

Today	O
,	O
right	O
now	O
,	O
at	O
this	O
moment	O
,	O
we	O
are	O
faced	O
with	O
a	O
massive	O
effort	O
of	O
the	O
military	O
/	O
security	O
complex	O
,	O
the	O
neoconservatives	O
,	O
the	O
Democratic	O
Party	O
,	O
and	O
the	O
presstitute	O
media	O
to	O
discredit	O
the	O
elected	O
President	O
of	O
the	O
United	O
States	O
and	O
to	O
overthrow	O
him	O
in	O
order	O
that	O
the	B-PROP
utterly	I-PROP
corrupt	I-PROP
elite	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
rule	I-PROP
American	I-PROP
can	O
continue	O
to	O
hold	O
on	O
to	O
power	O
and	O
to	O
protect	O
the	O
massive	O
budget	O
of	O
the	O
military	O
/	O
security	O
complex	O
that	O
,	O
along	O
with	O
the	O
Israel	O
Lobby	O
,	O
funds	O
the	O
elections	O
of	O
those	O
who	O
rule	O
us	O
.	O

Trump	O
,	O
like	O
Reagan	O
,	O
was	O
an	O
exception	O
,	O
and	O
it	O
is	O
the	O
exceptions	O
that	O
accumulate	O
the	O
ire	O
of	O
the	O
corrupt	B-PROP
leftwing	I-PROP
,	O
bought	O
off	O
with	O
money	O
,	O
and	O
the	O
ire	O
of	O
the	O
media	O
,	O
concentrated	O
into	O
small	O
tight	O
ownership	O
groups	O
indebted	O
to	O
those	O
who	O
permitted	O
the	O
illegal	O
concentration	O
of	O
a	O
once	O
independent	O
and	O
diverse	O
American	O
media	O
that	O
once	O
served	O
,	O
on	O
occasion	O
,	O
as	O
a	B-PROP
watchdog	I-PROP
over	I-PROP
government	I-PROP
.	O

The	O
rightwing	O
,	O
wrapped	O
in	O
the	O
flag	O
,	O
dismisses	B-PROP
all	O
truth	O
as	O
“	O
anti	B-PROP
-	I-PROP
American	I-PROP
.	I-PROP
”	I-PROP

If	O
Putin	O
,	O
Lavrov	O
,	O
the	O
Russian	O
government	O
,	O
the	O
traitorous	B-PROP
Russian	I-PROP
Fifth	I-PROP
Column	I-PROP
—	O
the	O
Atlanticist	O
Integrationists	O
—	O
the	O
Chinese	O
,	O
the	O
Iranians	O
,	O
the	O
North	O
Koreans	O
think	O
that	O
any	B-PROP
peace	I-PROP
or	I-PROP
consideration	I-PROP
can	I-PROP
come	I-PROP
out	O
of	O
America	O
,	O
they	B-PROP
are	I-PROP
insane	I-PROP
.	O

Their	B-PROP
delusions	I-PROP
are	I-PROP
setting	I-PROP
themselves	I-PROP
up	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
destruction	I-PROP
.	O

There	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
no	I-PROP
institution	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
America	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
government	I-PROP
or	I-PROP
private	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
can	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
trusted	I-PROP
.	O

Any	B-PROP
government	I-PROP
or	I-PROP
person	I-PROP
who	I-PROP
trusts	I-PROP
America	I-PROP
or	I-PROP
any	I-PROP
Western	I-PROP
country	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
stupid	I-PROP
beyond	I-PROP
belief	I-PROP
.	O

The	B-PROP
entire	I-PROP
Russiagate	I-PROP
hoax	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
an	I-PROP
orchestration	I-PROP
by	I-PROP
the	O
military	O
/	O
security	O
complex	O
,	O
led	O
by	O
John	O
Brennen	O
,	O
Comey	O
,	O
and	O
Rosenstein	O
.	O

The	O
purpose	O
is	O
to	O
discredit	O
President	O
trump	O
for	O
two	O
reasons	O
.	O

One	O
is	O
to	O
prevent	O
any	O
normalization	O
of	O
relations	O
with	O
Russia	O
.	O

The	O
other	O
is	O
to	O
remove	O
Trump	O
’s	O
agenda	O
as	O
an	O
alternative	O
to	O
the	O
agenda	O
of	O
the	O
Democratic	O
Party	O
.	O

How	B-PROP
America	I-PROP
Was	I-PROP
Lost	I-PROP
:	O
...	O
Dr.	O
Paul	O
Craig	O
Roberts	O
Best	O
Price	O
:	O
$	O
8.00	O
Buy	O
New	O
$	O
8.51	O
(	O
as	O
of	O
02:00	O
EDT	O
-	O
Details	O
)	O

President	B-PROP
Trump	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
almost	I-PROP
powerless	I-PROP
.	O

Putin	O
,	O
the	O
Chinese	O
,	O
the	O
Iranians	O
,	O
and	O
the	O
North	O
Koreans	O
should	O
recognize	O
this	O
before	B-PROP
it	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
too	I-PROP
late	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
them	I-PROP
.	O

President	O
Trump	O
can	O
not	O
fire	O
and	O
arrest	O
for	O
high	O
treason	O
Mueller	O
and	O
Rosenstein	O
.	O

And	O
Trump	B-PROP
can	I-PROP
not	I-PROP
indict	I-PROP
Hillary	O
for	O
her	O
numerous	B-PROP
unquestionable	I-PROP
crimes	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
plain	I-PROP
view	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
everyone	I-PROP
,	O
or	O
Comey	O
or	O
Brennan	O
,	O
who	O
declares	O
Trump	O
“	O
to	B-PROP
be	I-PROP
wholly	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
pocket	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
Putin	I-PROP
,	O
”	O
for	O
trying	O
to	O
overthrow	O
the	B-PROP
elected	I-PROP
president	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
United	I-PROP
States	I-PROP
.	O

Trump	B-PROP
can	I-PROP
not	I-PROP
have	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
Secret	I-PROP
Service	I-PROP
question	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
likes	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
Pelosi	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
Schumer	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
McCain	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
Lindsey	I-PROP
Graham	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
false	I-PROP
accusations	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
encourage	I-PROP
assassination	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
President	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
United	I-PROP
States	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

Trump	B-PROP
can	I-PROP
not	I-PROP
even	I-PROP
trust	I-PROP
the	O
Secret	O
Service	O
,	O
which	O
accumulated	O
evidence	O
suggests	O
was	O
complicit	O
in	O
the	O
assassination	O
of	O
President	O
John	O
F.	O
Kennedy	O
and	O
Robert	O
Kennedy	O
.	O

If	O
Putin	O
and	O
Lavrov	O
,	O
so	O
anxious	O
to	O
be	O
friends	O
of	O
Washington	O
,	O
let	O
their	O
guards	O
down	O
,	O
they	B-PROP
are	I-PROP
history	I-PROP
.	O

As	O
I	O
said	O
above	O
,	O
Russiagate	O
is	O
an	O
orchestratration	O
to	O
prevent	O
peace	O
between	O
the	O
US	O
and	O
Russia	O
.	O

Leading	O
military	O
/	O
security	O
complex	O
experts	O
,	O
including	O
the	O
person	O
who	O
provided	O
the	O
CIA	O
’s	O
daily	O
briefing	O
of	O
the	O
President	O
of	O
the	O
United	O
States	O
for	O
many	O
years	O
,	O
and	O
the	O
person	O
who	O
devised	O
the	O
spy	O
program	O
for	O
the	O
National	O
Security	O
Agency	O
,	O
have	B-PROP
proven	I-PROP
conclusively	I-PROP
that	O
Russiagate	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
hoax	I-PROP
designed	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
purpose	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
preventing	I-PROP
President	I-PROP
Trump	I-PROP
from	I-PROP
normalizing	I-PROP
relations	I-PROP
between	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
US	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
Russia	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
which	B-PROP
has	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
power	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
destroy	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
entirety	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
Western	I-PROP
World	I-PROP
at	I-PROP
will	I-PROP
.	O

Here	O
is	O
the	O
report	O
from	O
the	O
retired	O
security	O
professionals	O
who	O
,	O
unlike	O
those	O
still	O
in	O
office	O
,	O
can	O
not	O
be	O
fired	O
and	O
deprived	O
of	O
a	O
careet	O
for	O
telling	O
the	O
truth	O
.	O

Here	O
is	O
what	O
the	O
clued	B-PROP
-	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
Russian	O
Defense	O
Minister	O
Shoigu	O
has	O
to	O
say	O
about	O
the	O
aggressive	B-PROP
actions	O
of	O
the	O
West	O
against	O
the	O
Russian	O
homeland	O
.	O

If	B-PROP
Putin	I-PROP
does	I-PROP
n’t	I-PROP
listen	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
him	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
Russia	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
trash	I-PROP
can	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
history	I-PROP
.	O

Keep	O
in	O
mind	O
that	O
no	B-PROP
media	I-PROP
informs	I-PROP
you	O
better	O
than	O
my	O
website	O
.	O

If	O
my	O
website	O
goes	O
down	O
,	O
you	O
will	O
be	O
left	O
in	O
darkness	O
.	O

No	O
valid	O
information	O
comes	O
from	O
the	O
US	O
government	O
or	O
the	O
Western	O
presstitutes	O
.	O

If	B-PROP
you	I-PROP
sit	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
front	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
TV	I-PROP
screen	I-PROP
watching	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
Western	I-PROP
media	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
you	I-PROP
are	I-PROP
brainwashed	I-PROP
beyond	I-PROP
all	I-PROP
hope	I-PROP
.	O

Not	O
even	O
I	O
can	O
rescue	O
you	O
.	O

Nor	B-PROP
God	I-PROP
himself	I-PROP
.	O

Americans	B-PROP
,	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
indeed	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
Russians	I-PROP
themselves	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
are	I-PROP
incapable	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
realizing	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
,	O
but	O
there	O
is	O
a	O
chance	O
that	O
Trump	O
will	O
be	O
overthrown	O
and	O
a	O
Western	O
assault	O
will	O
be	O
launched	O
against	O
the	O
handful	O
of	O
countries	O
that	O
insist	O
on	O
sovereignty	O
.	O

I	O
doubt	O
that	O
few	O
of	O
the	O
Americans	B-PROP
who	O
elected	O
Trump	O
will	O
be	O
taken	O
in	O
by	O
the	O
anti	O
-	O
Trump	O
propagana	O
,	O
but	O
they	O
are	O
not	O
organized	O
and	O
have	O
no	O
armed	O
power	O
.	O

The	O
police	O
,	O
militarized	O
by	O
George	O
W.	O
Bush	O
and	O
Obama	O
,	O
will	O
be	O
set	O
against	O
them	O
.	O

The	O
rebellions	O
will	O
be	O
local	O
and	O
suppressed	O
by	O
every	O
violation	O
of	O
the	O
US	O
Constitution	O
by	O
the	O
private	O
powers	O
that	O
rule	O
Washington	O
,	O
as	O
always	O
has	O
been	O
the	O
case	O
with	O
rebellions	O
in	O
America	O
.	O

In	O
the	O
West	O
,	O
which	O
the	B-PROP
Russians	I-PROP
are	O
so	O
anxious	O
to	O
join	O
,	O
all	B-PROP
freedoms	I-PROP
are	I-PROP
dead	I-PROP
—	O
freedom	O
of	O
assembly	O
,	O
freedom	O
of	O
speech	O
,	O
freedom	O
of	O
association	O
,	O
freedom	O
of	O
inquiry	O
,	O
freedom	O
of	O
privacy	O
,	O
freedom	O
from	O
arbitrary	O
search	O
,	O
freedom	O
from	O
arbitrary	O
arrest	O
,	O
along	O
with	O
the	O
Constitutional	O
protections	O
of	O
due	O
process	O
and	O
habeas	O
corpus	O
.	O

Today	O
there	O
are	O
no	B-PROP
countries	I-PROP
less	I-PROP
free	I-PROP
than	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
United	I-PROP
States	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
America	I-PROP
.	O

Why	O
do	O
the	O
Russian	O
Atlanticist	O
Integrationists	O
want	O
to	O
join	O
an	O
unfree	O
Western	O
world	O
?	O

Are	B-PROP
they	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
brainwashed	I-PROP
by	I-PROP
Western	I-PROP
Propaganda	I-PROP
?	I-PROP

If	B-PROP
Putin	I-PROP
listens	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
these	I-PROP
deluded	I-PROP
fools	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
Putin	I-PROP
will	I-PROP
destroy	I-PROP
Russia	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

There	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
something	I-PROP
wrong	I-PROP
with	I-PROP
Russian	I-PROP
perception	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
Washington	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

Apparently	O
the	O
Russian	O
elite	O
,	O
with	O
the	O
exception	O
of	O
Shoigu	O
and	O
a	O
few	O
others	O
are	O
incapable	B-PROP
of	O
comprehending	O
the	O
neoconservative	O
drive	O
for	O
US	O
world	O
hegemony	O
and	O
the	O
neoconservative	O
determination	O
to	O
destroy	O
Russia	O
as	O
a	O
constraint	O
on	O
US	O
unilateralism	O
.	O

The	O
Russian	O
government	O
somehow	O
,	O
despite	O
all	O
evidence	O
to	O
the	O
contrary	O
,	O
believes	O
that	O
Washington	O
’s	O
hegemony	O
is	O
negotiable	O
.	O

The	O
Best	O
of	O
Paul	O
Craig	O
Roberts	O

The	O
Coming	O
Coup	O

The	O
annual	O
budget	O
of	O
the	O
military	O
/	O
security	O
complex	O
is	O
$	O
1,000	O
billion	O
.	O

This	O
vast	O
sum	O
is	O
drawn	O
from	O
US	O
taxpayers	O
who	O
have	O
many	O
unmet	O
needs	O
.	O

To	O
justify	O
such	O
an	O
enormous	O
budget	O
a	O
major	O
enemy	O
is	O
required	O
.	O

The	O
military	O
/	O
security	O
complex	O
and	O
the	O
media	O
and	O
politicians	O
that	O
the	O
complex	O
owns	O
have	O
designated	O
Russia	O
to	O
be	O
that	O
enemy	O
.	O

The	B-PROP
complex	I-PROP
and	O
its	O
political	O
and	O
media	O
agents	O
will	B-PROP
not	I-PROP
permit	I-PROP
Trump	I-PROP
to	O
normalize	O
relations	O
with	O
Russia	O
.	O

To	O
prevent	O
President	O
Trump	O
from	O
reducing	O
the	O
dangerous	O
tensions	O
between	O
nuclear	O
powers	O
that	O
Washington	O
has	O
created	O
,	O
the	O
military	O
/	O
security	O
complex	O
orchestrated	O
Russiagate	O
,	O
a	B-PROP
proven	I-PROP
hoax	I-PROP
,	O
but	O
believed	O
by	O
many	O
due	O
to	O
its	O
endless	O
repetition	O
.	O

The	O
military	O
/	O
security	O
complex	O
orchestrated	O
the	O
false	O
indictments	O
of	O
12	O
Russians	B-PROP
.	O

The	O
military	O
/	O
security	O
complex	O
orchestrated	O
the	O
false	O
arrest	O
of	O
Maria	O
Butina	O
,	O
and	O
so	O
on	O
and	O
on	O
.	O

The	O
military	O
/	O
security	O
complex	O
acting	O
through	O
the	O
politicians	O
and	O
presstitutes	O
that	O
it	O
owns	O
and	O
controls	O
has	O
turned	O
the	O
normal	O
everyday	O
responsibility	O
of	O
the	O
President	O
—	O
one	O
acknowledged	O
and	O
acted	O
upon	O
by	O
every	O
previous	O
president	O
—	O
to	O
defuse	O
tensions	O
that	O
could	O
lead	O
to	O
nuclear	O
war	O
into	O
a	O
high	O
crime	O
.	O

President	O
Trump	O
is	O
accused	O
of	O
treason	B-PROP
for	O
trying	O
to	O
make	O
peace	O
!	O

The	O
Tyranny	O
of	O
Good	O
In	O
...	O
Paul	O
Craig	O
Roberts	O
,	O
La	O
...	O
Best	O
Price	O
:	O
$	O
5.64	O
Buy	O
New	O
$	O
5.00	O
(	O
as	O
of	O
10:35	O
EDT	O
-	O
Details	O
)	O

An	O
unaware	O
person	O
might	O
think	O
that	O
this	O
is	O
silly	B-PROP
and	O
laugh	O
,	O
but	O
as	O
Finian	O
Cunningham	O
shows	O
,	O
President	B-PROP
Trump	I-PROP
has	I-PROP
been	I-PROP
set	I-PROP
-	I-PROP
up	I-PROP
as	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
treasonous	I-PROP
enemy	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
America	I-PROP
.	O

We	O
are	O
currently	O
experiencing	O
sedition	O
at	O
the	O
highest	O
levels	O
as	O
the	O
military	O
/	O
security	O
complex	O
unfolds	O
its	O
coup	O
against	O
the	O
elected	O
president	O
of	O
the	O
United	O
States	O
.	O

In	O
1961	O
President	O
Dwight	O
Eisenhower	O
warned	O
Americans	O
in	O
his	O
last	O
public	O
address	O
that	O
the	O
military	O
/	O
industrial	O
complex	O
was	O
a	B-PROP
threat	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
American	I-PROP
democracy	I-PROP
.	O

Truer	O
words	O
were	O
never	O
spoken	O
by	O
an	O
American	O
president	O
.	O

Shortly	O
thereafter	O
,	O
the	O
military	O
/	O
security	O
complex	O
assassinated	O
President	O
John	O
F.	O
Kennedy	O
for	O
working	O
toward	O
peace	O
with	O
Soviet	B-PROP
leader	O
Khrushchev	O
.	O

To	O
get	O
rid	O
of	O
President	O
Nixon	O
,	O
who	O
made	O
too	O
many	O
arms	O
control	O
agreements	O
with	O
the	O
Soviets	O
and	O
opened	O
to	O
China	O
,	O
the	O
military	O
/	O
security	O
complex	O
used	O
its	O
asset	O
,	O
the	O
Washington	O
Post	O
,	O
to	O
orchestrate	O
the	O
“	O
Watergate	O
crisis	O
”	O
that	O
the	O
military	O
/	O
security	O
complex	O
used	O
to	O
force	O
Nixon	O
’s	O
resignation	O
.	O

Now	O
the	O
military	O
/	O
security	O
complex	O
is	O
openly	O
inciting	O
sedition	O
against	O
the	O
President	O
of	O
the	O
United	O
States	O
.	O

If	O
this	O
plot	O
succeeds	O
,	O
which	O
is	O
the	O
most	O
likely	O
case	O
,	O
America	B-PROP
will	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
complete	I-PROP
dystopia	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
all	I-PROP
independent	I-PROP
voices	I-PROP
will	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
shut	I-PROP
down	I-PROP
.	O

Who	O
can	O
Trump	O
rely	O
on	O
?	O

Not	O
on	O
his	O
own	O
political	O
party	O
.	O

Not	O
on	O
his	O
own	O
government	O
.	O

Not	O
on	O
the	O
print	O
and	O
TV	O
media	O
or	O
NPR	O
.	O

Not	O
on	O
Europe	O
.	O

Not	O
on	O
the	O
Secret	O
Service	O
.	O

Not	O
on	O
the	O
Pentagon	O
.	O

Not	O
on	O
the	O
unaware	B-PROP
American	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
.	O

Trump	O
has	O
only	O
the	O
“	B-PROP
deplorables	I-PROP
,	O
”	O
and	O
they	O
are	O
unorganized	O
and	O
will	O
experience	O
retribution	O
once	O
Trump	O
is	O
removed	O
.	O

In	O
striving	O
to	O
come	O
to	O
an	O
agreement	O
with	O
Washington	O
,	O
Putin	O
and	O
Lavrov	O
are	O
butting	B-PROP
their	I-PROP
heads	I-PROP
against	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
stone	I-PROP
wall	I-PROP
.	O

Sooner	O
or	O
later	O
Putin	O
and	O
Lavrov	O
will	O
have	O
to	O
acknowledge	O
that	O
.	O

Once	O
Putin	O
and	O
Lavrov	O
realize	O
the	O
true	O
situation	O
,	O
they	O
will	O
understand	O
that	O
war	B-PROP
or	I-PROP
surrender	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
their	I-PROP
only	I-PROP
option	I-PROP
.	O

The	O
Best	O
of	O
Paul	O
Craig	O
Roberts	O

Federal	O
Judge	O
Overrides	O
DOJ	O
&	O
Violates	O
First	O
Amendment	O
:	O
Blocks	O
3D	O
-	O
Printed	O
Gun	O
Plans	O

In	O
July	O
,	O
I	O
reported	O
that	O
the	O
Department	O
of	O
Justice	O
finally	O
settled	O
with	O
Cody	O
Wilson	O
and	O
Defense	O
Distributed	O
over	O
his	O
3D	O
-	O
print	O
gun	O
plans	O
being	O
lawful	O
.	O

The	O
DOJ	O
surrendered	O
in	O
the	O
matter	O
and	O
accepted	O
the	O
fact	O
that	O
the	O
plans	O
are	O
protected	O
under	O
the	O
First	O
Amendment	O
.	O

However	O
,	O
a	O
federal	O
judge	O
,	O
in	O
a	O
lawsuit	O
brought	O
by	O
eight	O
states	O
and	O
the	O
District	O
of	O
Columbia	O
,	O
has	O
blocked	O
the	O
plans	O
from	O
being	O
released	O
.	O

The	O
judge	O
should	O
understand	O
that	O
these	O
plans	O
are	O
protected	O
under	O
the	O
First	O
Amendment	O
in	O
the	O
same	O
way	O
that	O
any	O
other	O
printed	O
material	O
is	O
,	O
and	O
that	O
there	O
is	O
no	O
crime	O
that	O
has	O
been	O
committed	O
by	O
making	O
them	O
available	O
to	O
people	O
online	O
.	O

Second	O
,	O
if	O
that	O
were	O
not	O
enough	O
,	O
we	O
already	O
know	O
that	O
the	O
Second	O
Amendment	O
protects	O
actual	O
arms	O
from	O
restriction	O
and	O
the	O
right	O
to	O
keep	O
and	O
bear	O
them	O
from	O
infringement	O
.	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O

Will	O
Brett	O
Kavanaugh	O
be	O
confirmed	O
to	O
the	O
Supreme	O
Court	O
?	O

Will	O
Brett	O
Kavanaugh	O
be	O
confirmed	O
to	O
the	O
Supreme	O
Court	O
?	O

Will	O
Brett	O
Kavanaugh	O
be	O
confirmed	O
to	O
the	O
Supreme	O
Court	O
?	O

*	O
Yes	O
,	O
he	O
will	O
be	O
confirmed	O
.	O

No	O
,	O
he	O
will	O
not	O
be	O
confirmed	O
.	O

Email	O
*	O

Comments	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Freedom	O
Outpost	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

Fox	O
News	O
has	O
the	O
story	O
:	O

U.S.	O
District	O
Judge	O
Robert	O
Lasnik	O
issued	O
the	O
order	O
a	O
day	O
after	O
eight	O
states	O
sued	O
the	O
government	O
to	O
block	O
a	O
settlement	O
reached	O
by	O
the	O
Trump	O
administration	O
last	O
month	O
allowing	O
a	O
Texas	O
-	O
based	O
company	O
,	O
Defense	O
Distributed	O
,	O
to	O
resume	O
online	O
-	O
sharing	O
of	O
blueprints	O
for	O
the	O
3D	O
firearms	O
.	O

The	O
company	O
was	O
set	O
to	O
allow	O
downloads	O
on	O
Wednesday	O
,	O
although	O
blueprints	O
have	O
been	O
posted	O
since	O
Friday	O
.	O

The	O
temporary	O
restraining	O
order	O
blocks	O
the	O
release	O
until	O
the	O
next	O
scheduled	O
hearing	O
on	O
August	O
10	O
.	O

In	O
the	O
meantime	O
,	O
Congressional	O
Democrats	O
have	O
urged	O
President	O
Trump	O
to	O
reverse	O
the	O
decision	O
letting	O
Defense	O
Distributed	O
publish	O
the	O
plans	O
.	O

Trump	O
said	O
Tuesday	O
that	O
he	O
's	O
"	O
looking	O
into	O
"	O
the	O
idea	O
,	O
saying	O
making	O
3D	O
plastic	O
guns	O
available	O
to	O
the	O
public	O
"	O
does	O
n't	O
seem	O
to	O
make	O
much	O
sense	O
!	O
"	O

Does	O
n't	O
make	O
much	O
sense	O
?	O

Are	B-PROP
you	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
serious	I-PROP
?	I-PROP

Why	O
,	O
yes	O
,	O
yes	O
they	O
are	O
serious	O
.	O

Deadly	B-PROP
serious	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

It	O
makes	O
perfect	O
sense	O
when	O
you	O
have	O
the	B-PROP
same	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
who	I-PROP
have	I-PROP
absolutely	I-PROP
no	I-PROP
problem	I-PROP
with	O
mothers	B-PROP
hiring	I-PROP
hitmen	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
murder	B-PROP
their	I-PROP
babies	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
their	I-PROP
wombs	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
most	I-PROP
brutal	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
barbaric	I-PROP
fashion	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
then	I-PROP
sell	I-PROP
off	I-PROP
their	I-PROP
body	I-PROP
parts	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
profit	I-PROP
,	O
if	B-PROP
they	I-PROP
do	I-PROP
n't	I-PROP
throw	I-PROP
them	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
trash	I-PROP
or	I-PROP
flush	I-PROP
them	I-PROP
down	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
toilet	I-PROP
,	O
calling	O
for	O
computer	O
files	O
to	O
be	O
kept	O
by	O
the	O
government	O
and	O
not	O
be	O
allowed	O
to	O
be	O
released	O
to	O
the	O
public	O
.	O

The	O
eight	O
states	O
are	O
the	O
usual	O
suspects	O
,	O
along	O
with	O
the	O
District	O
of	O
Columbia	O
,	O
and	O
we	O
should	O
note	O
which	O
ones	O
they	O
are	O
.	O

Washington	O

Connecticut	O

Maryland	O

New	O
Jersey	O

New	O
York	O

Oregon	O

Massachusetts	O

Pennsylvania	O

Washington	O
's	O
Attorney	O
General	O
Bob	O
Ferguson	O
's	O
office	O
claims	O
the	O
settlement	O
is	O
:	O

...	O
in	O
violation	O
of	O
the	O
Administrative	O
Procedure	O
Act	O
....	O
there	O
is	O
no	O
indication	O
in	O
the	O
settlement	O
agreement	O
or	O
elsewhere	O
that	O
any	O
analysis	O
,	O
study	O
or	O
determination	O
was	O
made	O
by	O
the	O
government	O
defendants	O
in	O
consultation	O
with	O
other	O
agencies	O
,	O
before	O
the	O
federal	O
government	O
agreed	O
to	O
lift	O
export	O
controls	O
on	O
the	O
downloadable	O
guns	O
.	O

In	O
fact	O
,	O
the	O
agreement	O
states	O
that	O
it	O
"	O
does	O
not	O
reflect	O
any	O
agreed	O
-	O
upon	O
purpose	O
other	O
than	O
the	O
desire	O
of	O
the	O
Parties	O
to	O
reach	O
a	O
full	O
and	O
final	O
conclusion	O
of	O
the	O
Action	O
,	O
and	O
to	O
resolve	O
the	O
Action	O
without	O
the	O
time	O
and	O
expense	O
of	O
further	O
litigation	O
.	O
"	O

The	O
lawsuit	O
also	O
argues	O
the	O
settlement	O
violates	O
the	O
Tenth	O
Amendment	O
by	O
infringing	O
on	O
states	O
'	O
rights	O
to	O
regulate	O
firearms	O
.	O

Washington	O
has	O
a	O
robust	O
regulatory	O
system	O
meant	O
to	O
keep	O
firearms	O
out	O
of	O
the	O
hands	O
of	O
dangerous	O
individuals	O
.	O

That	O
system	O
is	O
jeopardized	O
by	O
the	O
Trump	O
Administration	O
's	O
action	O
and	O
will	O
be	O
undermined	O
by	O
the	O
distribution	O
of	O
Defense	O
Distributed	O
's	O
downloadable	O
guns	O
.	O

Note	O
that	O
Ferguson	O
forgets	O
that	O
the	O
Tenth	O
Amendment	O
states	O
plainly	O
:	O

The	O
powers	O
not	O
delegated	O
to	O
the	O
United	O
States	O
by	O
the	O
Constitution	O
,	O
nor	O
prohibited	O
by	O
it	O
to	O
the	O
States	O
,	O
are	O
reserved	O
to	O
the	O
States	O
respectively	O
,	O
or	O
to	O
the	O
people	O
.	O

(	O
emphasis	O
mine	O
)	O

Since	O
our	O
founders	O
clearly	O
said	O
that	O
our	O
rights	O
come	O
from	O
our	O
Creator	O
,	O
and	O
the	O
Second	O
Amendment	O
acknowledges	O
that	O
the	O
"	O
right	O
of	O
the	O
people	O
to	O
keep	O
and	O
bear	O
arms	O
shall	O
not	O
be	O
infringed	O
,	O
"	O
I	O
truly	O
wonder	O
where	B-PROP
he	I-PROP
gets	I-PROP
this	I-PROP
idea	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
state	I-PROP
has	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
right	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
do	I-PROP
just	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
infringe	I-PROP
on	O
the	O
rights	O
of	O
the	O
people	O
by	O
regulating	O
firearms	O
.	O

he	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
reading	I-PROP
something	I-PROP
into	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
simply	I-PROP
not	I-PROP
there	I-PROP
,	O
but	O
that	O
's	O
a	O
Communist	O
ideology	O
you	O
are	O
seeing	O
there	O
,	O
not	B-PROP
an	I-PROP
American	I-PROP
one	I-PROP
.	O

Reason	O
reports	O
on	O
the	O
response	O
of	O
Defense	O
Distributed	O
:	O

Josh	O
Blackman	O
,	O
one	O
of	O
Defense	O
Distributed	O
's	O
lawyers	O
,	O
said	O
in	O
an	O
email	O
today	O
that	O
"	O
The	O
District	O
Court	O
in	O
Washington	O
already	O
approved	O
the	O
settlement	O
.	O

This	O
latest	O
suit	O
is	O
another	O
collateral	O
attack	O
on	O
a	O
rule	O
-	O
making	O
process	O
that	O
began	O
in	O
the	O
Obama	O
Administration	O
.	O
"	O

As	O
reported	O
yesterday	O
,	O
Defense	O
Distributed	O
is	O
already	O
embroiled	O
in	O
its	O
own	O
lawsuit	O
against	O
New	O
Jersey	O
and	O
Los	O
Angeles	O
over	O
those	O
authorities	O
'	O
threats	O
,	O
and	O
simultaneously	O
is	O
fighting	O
Pennsylvania	O
's	O
request	O
for	O
a	O
temporary	O
restraining	O
order	O
against	O
them	O
.	O

(	O
Both	O
those	O
states	O
are	O
also	O
part	O
of	O
today	O
's	O
federal	O
lawsuit	O
filed	O
in	O
the	O
Western	O
District	O
of	O
Washington	O
.	O
)	O

While	O
the	O
various	O
court	O
filings	O
about	O
this	O
continue	O
to	O
suggest	O
that	O
August	O
1	O
is	O
the	O
date	O
on	O
which	O
Defense	O
Distributed	O
will	O
begin	O
distributing	O
the	O
files	O
—	O
which	O
,	O
again	O
,	O
the	O
settlement	O
legally	O
permits	O
them	O
to	O
do	O
—	O
the	O
distribution	O
is	O
already	O
happening	O
.	O

Cody	O
Wilson	O
of	O
Defense	O
Distributed	O
is	O
already	O
fundraising	O
off	O
the	O
suit	O
via	O
Twitter	O
.	O

He	O
told	O
me	O
five	O
years	O
ago	O
,	O
when	O
I	O
was	O
writing	O
a	O
feature	O
story	O
on	O
the	O
beginnings	O
of	O
his	O
fight	O
with	O
the	O
government	O
over	O
gun	O
-	O
making	O
files	O
,	O
that	O
"	O
This	O
has	O
been	O
a	O
continuous	O
process	O
of	O
different	O
levels	O
of	O
authority	O
figures	O
trying	O
to	O
stop	O
it	O
from	O
happening	O
and	O
thus	O
allowing	O
it	O
to	O
happen	O
...	O
Of	O
course	O
we	O
are	O
going	O
to	O
succeed	O
—	O
because	O
you	O
all	O
are	O
trying	O
to	O
stop	O
me	O
.	O

That	O
seemed	O
natural	O
and	O
ended	O
up	O
being	O
true	O
.	O
"	O

So	O
far	O
,	O
that	O
has	O
continued	O
to	O
be	O
true	O
.	O

This	B-PROP
federal	I-PROP
judge	I-PROP
should	I-PROP
know	I-PROP
what	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
Constitution	I-PROP
actually	I-PROP
says	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
should	I-PROP
have	I-PROP
tossed	I-PROP
this	I-PROP
frivolous	I-PROP
lawsuit	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
trash	I-PROP
where	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
belongs	I-PROP
.	O

Instead	O
,	O
he	O
is	O
demonstrating	O
he	O
is	O
not	O
even	O
fit	O
to	O
sit	O
on	O
the	O
bench	O
,	O
and	O
the	O
attorney	O
generals	O
of	O
each	O
of	O
these	O
states	O
are	O
demonstrating	O
they	O
are	O
not	O
fit	O
to	O
be	O
in	O
the	O
office	O
they	O
are	O
in	O
.	O

Speaking	O
of	O
Defense	O
Distributed	O
and	O
Cody	O
Wilson	O
,	O
enter	O
to	O
win	O
this	O
Ghost	O
Gunner	O
2	O
and	O
make	O
your	O
own	O
guns	O
at	O
home	O
!	O

Texan	O
behind	O
3D	O
-	O
printed	O
guns	O
vows	O
legal	O
fight	O
as	O
White	O
House	O
endorses	O
court	O
ruling	O
|	O
Bangkok	O
Post	O
:	O
news	O

CHICAGO	O
-	O
A	O
US	O
gun	O
rights	O
advocate	O
began	O
gearing	O
up	O
for	O
a	O
legal	O
fight	O
Wednesday	O
to	O
be	O
able	O
to	O
publish	O
online	O
blueprints	O
for	O
3D	O
-	O
printed	O
firearms	O
,	O
as	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
signaled	O
support	O
for	O
a	O
federal	O
judge	O
's	O
decision	O
to	O
block	O
the	O
venture	O
.	O

Eight	O
US	O
states	O
and	O
the	O
District	O
of	O
Columbia	O
have	O
argued	O
in	O
court	O
that	O
the	O
blueprints	O
available	O
online	O
to	O
make	O
untraceable	O
,	O
undetectable	O
plastic	O
weapons	O
like	O
this	O
single	O
-	O
shot	O
"	O
Liberator	O
"	O
handgun	O
could	O
fall	O
into	O
the	O
wrong	O
hands	O

Cody	O
Wilson	O
's	O
Texas	O
-	O
based	O
company	O
Defense	O
Distributed	O
had	O
briefly	O
made	O
the	O
blueprints	O
available	O
online	O
,	O
but	O
Seattle	O
-	O
based	O
US	O
District	O
Judge	O
Robert	O
Lasnik	O
granted	O
an	O
injunction	O
Tuesday	O
to	O
take	O
the	O
material	O
down	O
.	O

The	O
Donald	O
Trump	O
administration	O
last	O
month	O
gave	O
permission	O
for	O
Wilson	O
to	O
publish	O
the	O
blueprints	O
,	O
but	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
said	O
Wednesday	O
the	O
president	O
was	O
unaware	O
of	O
the	O
decision	O
and	O
was	O
glad	O
it	O
was	O
being	O
reviewed	O
.	O

Eight	O
US	O
states	O
and	O
the	O
District	O
of	O
Columbia	O
sued	O
,	O
arguing	O
the	O
blueprints	O
could	O
allow	O
anyone	O
--	O
from	O
a	O
teen	O
to	O
a	B-PROP
'	I-PROP
lone	I-PROP
wolf	I-PROP
'	I-PROP
gunman	I-PROP
--	O
to	O
make	O
untraceable	O
,	O
undetectable	O
plastic	O
weapons	O
.	O

Wilson	O
complied	O
with	O
the	O
judge	O
's	O
order	O
,	O
but	O
put	O
out	O
a	O
call	O
for	O
financial	O
support	O
for	O
the	O
legal	O
battle	O
ahead	O
,	O
including	O
a	O
scheduled	O
August	O
10	O
court	O
hearing	O
.	O

He	O
told	O
CBS	O
News	O
ahead	O
of	O
the	O
injunction	O
that	O
he	O
believes	O
"	O
access	O
to	O
firearms	O
is	O
a	O
fundamental	O
human	O
dignity	O
.	O

It	O
's	O
a	O
fundamental	O
human	O
right	O
.	O
"	O

"	O
What	O
I	O
'm	O
doing	O
is	O
legally	O
protected	O
,	O
"	O
he	O
said	O
.	O

"	O
I	O
will	O
go	O
to	O
the	O
appellate	O
level	O
.	O

I	O
will	O
go	O
to	O
the	O
Supreme	O
Court	O
.	O

I	B-PROP
will	I-PROP
waste	I-PROP
all	I-PROP
my	I-PROP
time	I-PROP
.	O
"	O

-	O
President	O
'	O
glad	O
'	O
for	O
review	O
-	O

As	O
uproar	O
was	O
building	O
Tuesday	O
over	O
Wilson	O
's	O
efforts	O
,	O
the	O
president	O
tweeted	O
that	O
making	O
plastic	O
3D	O
-	O
printed	O
guns	O
publicly	O
available	O
"	O
does	O
n't	O
seem	O
to	O
make	O
much	O
sense	O
.	O
"	O

White	O
House	O
spokeswoman	O
Sarah	O
Sanders	O
elaborated	O
Wednesday	O
,	O
saying	O
the	O
administration	O
's	O
Justice	O
Department	O
had	O
acted	O
on	O
its	O
own	O
in	O
granting	O
Wilson	O
permission	O
to	O
publish	O
the	O
blueprints	O
on	O
his	O
Defcad	O
website	O
--	O
settling	O
a	O
five	O
-	O
year	O
legal	O
battle	O
.	O

"	O
The	O
Department	O
of	O
Justice	O
made	O
a	O
deal	O
without	O
the	O
president	O
's	O
approval	O
,	O
"	O
Sanders	O
said	O
.	O

"	O
The	O
president	O
's	O
glad	O
this	O
effort	O
was	O
delayed	O
to	O
give	O
more	O
time	O
to	O
review	O
the	O
issue	O
.	O
"	O

Sanders	O
also	O
repeated	O
the	O
administration	O
's	O
claim	O
from	O
a	O
day	O
earlier	O
that	O
existing	O
law	O
already	O
prohibits	O
plastic	O
firearms	O
.	O

The	O
National	O
Rifle	O
Association	O
,	O
the	O
nation	O
's	O
most	O
politically	O
influential	O
gun	O
rights	O
group	O
,	O
echoed	O
that	O
claim	O
,	O
contending	O
that	O
the	O
1988	O
law	O
made	O
the	O
current	O
3D	O
-	O
printed	O
gun	O
issue	O
moot	O
.	O

"	O
Regardless	O
of	O
what	O
a	O
person	O
may	O
be	O
able	O
to	O
publish	O
on	O
the	O
Internet	O
,	O
undetectable	O
plastic	O
guns	O
have	O
been	O
illegal	O
for	O
30	O
years	O
,	O
"	O
the	O
NRA	O
said	O
in	O
a	O
statement	O
.	O

But	O
Wilson	O
has	O
gotten	O
around	O
the	O
legal	O
prohibition	O
by	O
providing	O
instructions	O
with	O
the	O
digital	O
files	O
for	O
3D	O
printing	O
his	O
"	O
Liberator	O
"	O
plastic	O
gun	O
that	O
call	O
for	O
an	O
approximately	O
six	O
-	O
ounce	O
block	O
of	O
steel	O
to	O
be	O
affixed	O
to	O
the	O
weapon	O
.	O

Should	O
those	O
who	O
print	O
the	O
gun	O
follow	O
those	O
instructions	O
,	O
metal	O
detectors	O
would	O
pick	O
up	O
the	O
weapons	O
,	O
thus	O
complying	O
with	O
the	O
law	O
.	O

But	O
while	O
users	O
can	O
build	O
the	O
gun	O
,	O
there	O
is	O
no	O
way	O
to	O
ensure	O
they	O
affix	O
metal	O
to	O
it	O
.	O

-	O
'	O
The	O
debate	O
is	O
over	O
'	O
-	O

Late	O
Tuesday	O
,	O
dozens	O
of	O
Democratic	O
senators	O
introduced	O
legislation	O
to	O
prohibit	O
the	O
publication	O
of	O
3D	O
-	O
printable	O
firearm	O
designs	O
,	O
a	O
move	O
gun	O
control	O
groups	O
applauded	O
.	O

But	O
some	O
damage	O
was	O
already	O
done	O
.	O

Wilson	O
's	O
blueprints	O
had	O
been	O
posted	O
on	O
Defcad	O
before	O
the	O
court	O
order	O
took	O
effect	O
and	O
had	O
already	O
been	O
downloaded	O
thousands	O
of	O
times	O
.	O

"	O
The	O
debate	O
is	O
over	O
.	O

The	O
guns	O
are	O
downloadable	O
.	O

The	O
files	O
are	O
in	O
the	O
public	O
domain	O
--	O
you	O
can	O
not	O
take	O
them	O
back	O
,	O
"	O
Wilson	O
told	O
CBS	O
.	O

Gun	O
control	O
groups	O
nevertheless	O
were	O
relieved	O
by	O
the	O
judge	O
's	O
decision	O
,	O
with	O
the	O
Brady	O
Campaign	O
to	O
Prevent	O
Gun	O
Violence	O
calling	O
3D	O
-	O
printed	O
firearms	O
"	O
nothing	B-PROP
short	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
menace	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
society	I-PROP
.	O
"	O

"	O
There	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
simply	I-PROP
no	I-PROP
way	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
telling	I-PROP
how	I-PROP
much	I-PROP
damage	I-PROP
has	I-PROP
already	I-PROP
been	I-PROP
done	I-PROP
by	O
Cody	O
Wilson	O
's	O
dangerous	B-PROP
and	I-PROP
reckless	B-PROP
actions	I-PROP
,	O
"	O
Brady	O
Campaign	O
co	O
-	O
president	O
Kris	O
Brown	O
said	O
in	O
a	O
statement	O
.	O

"	O
This	O
is	O
a	O
strong	O
step	O
and	O
a	O
clear	O
victory	O
for	O
the	O
entire	O
gun	O
safety	O
movement	O
,	O
but	O
we	B-PROP
simply	I-PROP
ca	I-PROP
n't	I-PROP
let	I-PROP
up	I-PROP
.	O
"	O

Prior	O
to	O
last	O
month	O
,	O
Wilson	O
had	O
actually	O
been	O
losing	O
his	O
drawn	O
-	O
out	O
legal	O
battle	O
,	O
after	O
both	O
a	O
federal	O
district	O
court	O
and	O
an	O
appellate	O
court	O
ruled	O
against	O
him	O
.	O

The	O
US	O
Supreme	O
Court	O
declined	O
to	O
take	O
up	O
his	O
case	O
.	O

But	O
in	O
a	O
sign	O
of	O
his	O
determination	O
to	O
continue	O
the	O
legal	O
fight	O
,	O
a	O
message	O
on	O
the	O
Defense	O
Distributed	O
website	O
made	O
a	O
public	O
appeal	O
for	O
financial	O
support	O
"	O
to	O
uncensor	O
the	O
site	O
.	O
"	O

11	O
Children	O
Have	O
Been	O
Rescued	O
From	O
a	O
Muslim	B-PROP
Extremist	O
-	O
Run	O
Compound	O
In	O
NM	O

Eleven	O
children	O
were	O
rescued	O
from	O
a	O
compound	O
in	O
New	O
Mexico	O
which	O
was	O
being	O
run	O
by	O
armed	B-PROP
Muslim	I-PROP
extremists	O
.	O

Authorities	O
found	O
all	O
the	O
children	O
living	O
in	O
deplorable	B-PROP
living	I-PROP
conditions	I-PROP
after	O
raiding	O
the	O
property	O
looking	O
specifically	O
for	O
a	O
three	O
-	O
year	O
-	O
old	O
boy	O
.	O

According	O
to	O
The	O
Daily	O
Caller	O
,	O
the	O
police	O
did	O
n’t	O
find	O
the	O
little	O
boy	O
,	O
named	O
Abdul	O
-	O
Ghani	O
Wahhaj	O
,	O
but	O
they	O
did	O
discover	O
11	O
other	O
children	O
between	O
the	O
ages	O
of	O
one	O
and	O
15-years	O
-	O
old	O
being	O
held	O
in	O
the	B-PROP
“	I-PROP
saddest	B-PROP
living	I-PROP
conditions	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
poverty	I-PROP
I	I-PROP
have	I-PROP
seen	I-PROP
,	O
”	O
Taos	O
County	O
Sheriff	O
Jerry	O
Hogrefe	O
said	O
in	O
a	O
statement	O
posted	O
to	O
the	O
agency	O
’s	O
Facebook	O
page	O
Saturday	O
.	O

Hogrefe	O
also	O
added	O
that	O
he	O
only	O
saw	O
a	O
few	O
potatoes	O
and	O
a	O
box	O
of	O
rice	O
as	O
food	O
at	O
the	O
compound	O
.	O

Abdul	O
-	O
Ghani	O
’s	O
mother	O
reported	O
her	O
son	O
missing	O
after	O
Wahhaj	O
took	O
the	O
boy	O
,	O
who	O
turned	O
4	O
on	O
Monday	O
,	O
to	O
the	O
park	O
in	O
Clayton	O
County	O
,	O
Georgia	O
,	O
and	O
did	O
n’t	O
return	O
,	O
The	O
Albuquerque	O
Journal	O
reported	O
.	O

She	O
added	O
the	O
boy	O
suffers	O
from	O
a	O
medical	O
condition	O
.	O

Investigators	O
believe	O
that	O
the	O
three	O
-	O
year	O
-	O
old	O
boy	O
,	O
who	O
turned	O
four	O
on	O
Monday	O
,	O
they	O
were	O
looking	O
for	O
had	O
been	O
at	O
the	O
compound	O
in	O
earlier	O
weeks	O
.	O

Siraj	O
Wahhaj	O
,	O
39	O
,	O
and	O
Lucas	O
Morten	O
,	O
two	O
very	O
heavily	O
armed	O
men	O
who	O
are	O
believed	O
to	O
be	O
“	O
extremist[s	B-PROP
]	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
Muslim	I-PROP
belief	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
”	O
were	O
running	O
the	O
horrifying	B-PROP
compound	O
,	O
Hogrefe	O
said	O
.	O

When	O
police	O
arrived	O
on	O
the	O
scene	O
,	O
Wahhaj	O
was	O
armed	O
with	O
an	O
AR-15-style	O
rifle	O
and	O
several	O
loaded	O
30-round	O
magazines	O
.	O

He	O
also	O
allegedly	O
had	O
on	O
him	O
four	O
loaded	O
pistols	O
.	O

According	O
to	O
a	O
report	O
by	O
Fox	O
News	O
,	O
Hogrefe	O
said	O
authorities	O
had	O
conducted	O
surveillance	O
of	O
the	O
compound	O
while	O
looking	O
for	O
the	O
missing	O
boy	O
before	O
he	O
decided	O
Thursday	O
to	O
get	O
a	O
search	O
warrant	O
.	O

The	O
warrant	O
was	O
immediately	O
obtained	O
after	O
a	O
Georgia	O
investigator	O
forwarded	O
a	O
message	O
in	O
which	O
someone	O
at	O
the	O
compound	O
reportedly	O
told	O
another	O
person	O
that	O
people	O
who	O
were	O
living	O
in	O
the	O
shanty	O
were	O
starving	O
and	O
needed	O
water	O
.	O

“	O
The	O
message	O
sent	O
to	O
a	O
third	O
party	O
simply	O
said	O
in	O
part	O
,	O
‘	O
We	O
are	O
starving	O
and	O
need	O
food	O
and	O
water	O
,	O
’	O
”	O
Hogrefe	O
said	O
.	O

“	O
I	O
absolutely	O
knew	O
that	O
we	O
could	O
n’t	O
wait	O
on	O
another	O
agency	O
to	O
step	O
up	O
and	O
we	O
had	O
to	O
go	O
check	O
this	O
out	O
as	O
soon	O
as	O
possible	O
.	O
”	O

Police	O
stated	O
on	O
Sunday	O
that	O
they	O
are	O
still	O
looking	O
for	O
Abdul	O
-	O
Ghani	O
.	O

2	O
Men	O
,	O
Moms	O
Arrested	O
After	O
Child	O
Found	O
Dead	O
,	O
11	O
More	O
Found	O
In	O
‘	O
Filthy	B-PROP
’	I-PROP
New	O
Mexico	O
Compound	O
With	O
Armed	O
‘	O
Muslim	B-PROP
Extremists	I-PROP
’	O

TAOS	O
COUNTY	O
,	O
NEW	O
MEXICO	O
—	O
Two	O
males	O
from	O
Georgia	O
are	O
in	O
custody	O
after	O
TCSO	O
served	O
a	O
search	O
warrant	O
at	O
a	O
makeshift	O
residence	O
that	O
is	O
best	O
described	O
as	O
a	O
“	O
compound	O
”	O
in	O
Amalia	O
,	O
NM	O
.	O

Eleven	O
children	O
ranging	O
in	O
age	O
from	O
1	O
to	O
15-years	O
-	O
old	O
were	O
also	O
taken	O
in	O
protective	O
custody	O
and	O
later	O
turned	O
over	O
to	O
New	O
Mexico	O
Children	O
Youth	O
and	O
Families	O
Department	O
(	O
CYFD	O
)	O
for	O
their	O
own	O
health	O
and	O
safety	O
.	O

Three	O
women	O
believed	O
to	O
be	O
the	O
children	O
’s	O
mothers	O
were	O
also	O
arrested	O
.	O

Thursday	O
afternoon	O
Sheriff	O
Jerry	O
Hogrefe	O
swore	O
out	O
an	O
affidavit	O
for	O
a	O
search	O
warrant	O
that	O
states	O
there	O
is	O
a	O
makeshift	O
compound	O
surrounded	O
by	O
tires	O
and	O
an	O
earthen	O
berm	O
in	O
Costilla	O
Meadows	O
subdivision	O
that	O
he	O
reasonably	O
believed	O
was	O
occupied	O
by	O
adult	O
Lucas	O
Morton	O
and	O
others	O
,	O
including	O
39-year	O
-	O
old	O
Siraj	O
Wahhaj	O
,	O
who	O
was	O
wanted	O
for	O
child	O
abduction	O
and	O
3-year	O
-	O
old	O
AG	O
Wahhaj	O
,	O
the	O
child	O
that	O
was	O
abducted	O
.	O

This	O
warrant	O
came	O
after	O
a	O
two	O
-	O
month	O
investigation	O
in	O
conjunction	O
with	O
Clayton	O
County	O
,	O
Georgia	O
and	O
FBI	O
investigators	O
.	O

According	O
to	O
Sheriff	O
Hogrefe	O
the	O
FBI	O
had	O
recently	O
provided	O
information	O
and	O
surveillance	O
on	O
this	O
location	O
,	O
but	O
they	O
(	O
FBI	O
)	O
did	O
n’t	O
feel	O
there	O
was	O
enough	O
probable	O
cause	O
to	O
get	O
on	O
the	O
property	O
.	O

In	O
the	O
press	O
release	O
Sheriff	O
Hogrefe	O
said	O
,	O
“	O
That	O
all	O
changed	O
for	O
me	O
when	O
a	O
message	O
was	O
forwarded	O
to	O
us	O
from	O
a	O
Georgia	O
Detective	O
that	O
we	O
reasonably	O
believed	O
came	O
from	O
someone	O
at	O
the	O
compound	O
–	O
the	O
message	O
sent	O
to	O
a	O
third	O
party	O
simply	O
said	O
in	O
part	O
“	O
we	O
are	O
starving	O
and	O
need	O
food	O
and	O
water	O
”	O
.	O

I	O
absolutely	O
knew	O
that	O
we	O
could	O
n’t	O
wait	O
on	O
another	O
agency	O
to	O
step	O
up	O
and	O
we	O
had	O
to	O
go	O
check	O
this	O
out	O
as	O
soon	O
as	O
possible	O
,	O
so	O
I	O
began	O
working	O
on	O
a	O
search	O
warrant	O
right	O
after	O
I	O
got	O
that	O
intercepted	O
message	O
–	O
it	O
had	O
to	O
be	O
a	O
search	O
warrant	O
and	O
a	O
tactical	O
approach	O
for	O
our	O
own	O
safety	O
because	O
we	O
had	O
learned	O
the	O
occupants	O
were	O
most	O
likely	O
heavily	O
armed	O
and	O
considered	O
extremist	O
of	O
the	O
Muslim	O
belief	O
.	O

We	O
also	O
knew	O
from	O
the	O
layout	O
of	O
the	O
compound	O
they	O
would	O
have	O
an	O
advantage	O
if	O
we	O
did	O
n’t	O
deploy	O
tactfully	O
and	O
quickly	O
.	O
”	O

On	O
Friday	O
morning	O
,	O
August	O
3	O
,	O
2018	O
,	O
eight	O
members	O
of	O
TCSO	O
’s	O
Sheriff	O
’s	O
Response	O
Team	O
(	O
SRT	O
)	O
were	O
assisted	O
by	O
four	O
members	O
of	O
the	O
State	O
OSI	O
unit	O
when	O
they	O
executed	O
the	O
search	O
warrant	O
.	O

The	O
“	O
all	O
day	O
”	O
operation	O
went	O
without	O
major	O
incident	O
or	O
any	O
injuries	O
,	O
but	O
when	O
encountered	O
both	O
men	O
initially	O
refused	O
to	O
follow	O
verbal	O
direction	O
and	O
Wahhaj	O
who	O
was	O
held	O
up	O
inside	O
the	O
compound	O
was	O
heavily	O
armed	O
with	O
an	O
AR15	O
rifle	O
,	O
five	O
loaded	O
30	O
round	O
magazines	O
,	O
and	O
four	O
loaded	O
pistols	O
,	O
including	O
one	O
in	O
his	O
pocket	O
when	O
he	O
was	O
taken	O
down	O
.	O

Many	O
more	O
rounds	O
of	O
ammo	O
were	O
found	O
in	O
the	O
makeshift	O
compound	O
that	O
consists	O
of	O
a	O
small	O
travel	O
trailer	O
buried	O
in	O
the	O
ground	O
covered	O
by	O
plastic	O
with	O
no	O
water	O
,	O
plumbing	O
,	O
or	O
electricity	O
.	O

“	O
The	O
only	O
food	O
We	O
saw	O
were	O
a	O
few	O
potatoes	O
and	O
a	O
box	O
of	O
rice	O
in	O
the	O
filthy	B-PROP
trailer	O
,	O
”	O
said	O
Hogrefe	O
.	O

“	O
But	O
what	O
was	O
most	O
surprising	O
,	O
and	O
heartbreaking	O
was	O
when	O
the	O
team	O
located	O
a	O
total	O
of	O
five	O
adults	O
and	O
11	O
children	O
that	O
looked	O
like	O
third	O
world	O
country	O
refugees	O
not	O
only	O
with	O
no	O
food	O
or	O
fresh	O
water	O
,	O
but	O
with	O
no	O
shoes	O
,	O
personal	O
hygiene	O
and	O
basically	O
dirty	O
rags	O
for	O
clothing	O
.	O
”	O

The	O
body	O
of	O
a	O
yound	O
boy	O
was	O
also	O
located	O
,	O
however	O
,	O
it	O
is	O
not	O
clear	O
if	O
the	O
boy	O
is	O
the	O
missing	O
child	O
from	O
Georgia	O
.	O

Both	O
males	O
were	O
arrested	O
;	O
Morton	O
was	O
charged	O
with	O
harboring	O
a	O
fugitive	O
and	O
Wahhaj	O
was	O
booked	O
on	O
his	O
no	O
bond	O
Georgia	O
warrant	O
for	O
child	O
abduction	O
.	O

The	O
three	O
females	O
believed	O
to	O
be	O
the	O
mothers	O
of	O
the	O
eleven	O
children	O
,	O
Jany	O
Leveille	O
age	O
35	O
,	O
Hujrah	O
Wahhaj	O
age	O
38	O
,	O
and	O
Subhannah	O
Wahhaj	O
age	O
35	O
were	O
arrested	O
without	O
incident	O
in	O
Taos	O
and	O
were	O
later	O
booked	O
in	O
the	O
Taos	O
Adult	O
Detention	O
Center	O
.	O

“	O
We	O
all	O
gave	O
the	O
kids	O
our	O
water	O
and	O
what	O
snacks	O
we	O
had	O
–	O
it	O
was	O
the	B-PROP
saddest	I-PROP
living	I-PROP
conditions	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
poverty	I-PROP
I	I-PROP
have	I-PROP
seen	I-PROP
.	O
”	O

None	O
of	O
the	O
adults	O
would	O
give	O
statement	O
to	O
the	O
current	O
whereabouts	O
of	O
AG	O
Wahhaj	O
,	O
but	O
it	O
is	O
reasonably	O
believed	O
he	O
was	O
there	O
a	O
few	O
weeks	O
ago	O
.	O

The	O
investigation	O
is	O
fluid	O
and	O
ongoing	O
.	O

Advertisements	O

comments	O

Couple	O
question	O
why	O
police	O
waited	O
so	O
long	O
to	O
search	O
New	O
Mexico	O
compound	O

(	O
CNN	O
)	O
A	O
New	O
Mexico	O
couple	O
told	O
authorities	O
months	O
ago	O
they	O
thought	O
a	O
missing	O
Georgia	O
boy	O
and	O
his	O
fugitive	B-PROP
father	O
were	O
living	O
in	O
a	O
filthy	B-PROP
compound	I-PROP
on	O
their	O
property	O
.	O

But	O
police	O
did	O
not	O
carry	O
out	O
a	O
search	O
of	O
the	O
property	O
until	O
last	O
week	O
,	O
Taos	O
County	O
Sheriff	O
Jerry	O
Hogrefe	O
said	O
,	O
because	O
they	O
did	O
not	O
believe	O
they	O
had	O
probable	O
cause	O
in	O
the	O
case	O
.	O

That	O
delay	O
is	O
facing	O
scrutiny	O
in	O
the	O
wake	O
of	O
Monday	O
's	O
discovery	O
of	O
a	O
young	O
boy	O
's	O
remains	O
at	O
the	O
compound	O
.	O

"	O
They	O
were	O
dragging	O
their	O
feet	O
.	O

They	O
were	O
taking	O
too	O
long	O
,	O
"	O
said	O
Tanya	O
Badger	O
,	O
who	O
with	O
her	O
husband	O
,	O
Jason	O
,	O
told	O
authorities	O
about	O
the	O
boy	O
's	O
suspected	O
presence	O
at	O
the	O
compound	O
.	O

"	O
Even	O
if	O
they	O
were	O
trying	O
to	O
build	O
a	O
case	O
or	O
whatnot	O
,	O
a	B-PROP
child	I-PROP
's	I-PROP
life	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
at	I-PROP
stake	I-PROP
.	O
"	O

It	O
's	O
not	O
clear	O
whether	O
the	O
remains	O
are	O
those	O
of	O
Abdul	O
-	O
Ghani	O
Wahhaj	O
,	O
a	O
child	O
with	O
severe	O
medical	O
problems	O
who	O
disappeared	O
from	O
Georgia	O
about	O
nine	O
months	O
ago	O
.	O

The	O
remains	O
were	O
discovered	O
in	O
a	O
wretched	B-PROP
compound	I-PROP
along	O
with	O
11	O
starving	O
children	O
,	O
authorities	O
said	O
.	O

More	O
details	O
about	O
the	O
horrid	B-PROP
compound	O
could	O
be	O
revealed	O
Wednesday	O
when	O
the	O
five	O
adults	O
arrested	O
from	O
the	O
site	O
make	O
their	O
first	O
court	O
appearances	O
.	O

Authorities	O
raided	O
the	O
compound	O
in	O
Amalia	O
,	O
New	O
Mexico	O
,	O
on	O
Friday	O
as	O
part	O
of	O
their	O
search	O
for	O
Abdul	O
-	O
Ghani	O
,	O
whose	O
father	O
,	O
Siraj	O
Wahhaj	O
,	O
allegedly	O
abducted	O
him	O
from	O
Georgia	O
in	O
November	O
.	O

Neighbors	O
raised	O
alarm	O
about	O
a	O
suspect	O

The	O
Badgers	O
,	O
whose	O
land	O
the	O
compound	O
was	O
on	O
,	O
said	O
they	O
saw	O
a	O
boy	O
they	O
thought	O
was	O
Abdul	O
-	O
Ghani	O
in	O
January	O
and	O
February	O
.	O

In	O
April	O
,	O
they	O
discovered	O
the	O
boy	O
was	O
listed	O
as	O
missing	O
and	O
his	O
father	O
a	O
fugitive	O
.	O

They	O
reported	O
the	O
sightings	O
to	O
state	O
and	O
local	O
law	O
enforcement	O
,	O
but	O
it	O
was	O
months	O
before	O
police	O
moved	O
in	O
,	O
the	O
couple	O
said	O
.	O

"	O
We	B-PROP
are	I-PROP
just	I-PROP
beyond	I-PROP
frustrated	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
took	I-PROP
so	I-PROP
long	I-PROP
,	O
"	O
Tanya	O
Badger	O
said	O
.	O

New	O
Mexico	O
authorities	O
had	O
suspected	O
the	O
father	O
and	O
son	O
might	O
be	O
at	O
the	O
compound	O
after	O
learning	O
about	O
the	O
abduction	O
in	O
May	O
,	O
the	O
sheriff	O
said	O
.	O

But	O
there	O
was	O
not	O
enough	O
evidence	O
for	O
a	O
search	O
warrant	O
,	O
and	O
surveillance	O
of	O
the	O
property	O
did	O
n't	O
identify	O
the	O
pair	O
there	O
.	O

"	O
I	O
had	O
no	O
probable	O
cause	O
to	O
go	O
onto	O
this	O
property	O
,	O
"	O
Hogrefe	O
said	O
.	O

"	O
In	O
hindsight	O
I	O
wish	O
there	O
was	O
,	O
but	O
we	O
would	O
not	O
have	O
been	O
there	O
lawfully	O
.	O
"	O

The	O
sheriff	O
said	O
that	O
"	O
they	O
did	O
surveillance	O
,	O
both	O
ground	O
and	O
aerial	O
,	O
and	O
photographs	O
were	O
shared	O
with	O
the	O
family	O
and	O
mother	O
of	O
the	O
missing	O
boy	O
.	O

The	O
boy	O
Abdul	O
was	O
never	O
identified	O
from	O
those	O
photos	O
.	O

Moving	O
forward	O
we	O
knew	O
that	O
there	O
was	O
this	O
compound	O
,	O
but	O
we	O
had	O
very	O
little	O
details	O
about	O
it	O
or	O
who	O
was	O
occupying	O
it	O
.	O

These	O
people	O
just	O
kind	O
of	O
(	O
sprang	O
)	O
up	O
very	O
quickly	O
.	O
"	O

The	O
authorities	O
'	O
view	O
changed	O
Thursday	O
when	O
they	O
said	O
they	O
received	O
a	O
message	O
about	O
possible	O
starving	O
children	O
living	O
on	O
the	O
compound	O
,	O
and	O
had	O
enough	O
probable	O
cause	O
to	O
put	O
in	O
an	O
affidavit	O
for	O
a	O
search	O
warrant	O
.	O

"	O
We	O
are	O
starving	O
and	O
need	O
food	O
and	O
water	O
,	O
"	O
the	O
message	O
said	O
,	O
according	O
to	O
authorities	O
.	O

Authorities	O
said	O
it	O
was	O
forwarded	O
to	O
them	O
but	O
did	O
not	O
provide	O
details	O
on	O
its	O
origin	O
.	O

Compound	O
was	O
n't	O
searched	O
thoroughly	O
,	O
couple	O
say	O

When	O
officers	O
executed	O
a	O
search	O
warrant	O
on	O
the	O
compound	O
,	O
they	O
found	O
a	B-PROP
horrifying	I-PROP
scene	I-PROP
.	O

Stacks	O
of	O
tires	O
,	O
piles	O
of	O
trash	O
and	O
plastic	O
sheets	O
surrounded	O
the	O
compound	O
.	O

Obscured	O
by	O
the	O
junk	O
was	O
a	O
trailer	O
where	O
the	O
11	O
children	O
and	O
five	O
adults	O
were	O
living	O
.	O

The	O
children	O
wore	O
dirty	O
rags	O
for	O
clothing	O
with	O
no	O
shoes	O
,	O
and	O
were	O
surrounded	O
by	O
weapons	O
and	O
rounds	O
of	O
ammunition	O
,	O
authorities	O
said	O
.	O

"	O
It	O
was	O
the	B-PROP
saddest	I-PROP
living	I-PROP
conditions	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
poverty	I-PROP
I	I-PROP
have	I-PROP
seen	I-PROP
,	O
"	O
Hogrefe	O
said	O
.	O

The	O
father	O
of	O
the	O
missing	O
boy	O
,	O
Siraj	O
Wahhaj	O
,	O
was	O
arrested	O
at	O
the	O
compound	O
Friday	O
along	O
with	O
his	O
sisters	O
Hujrah	O
Wahhaj	O
and	O
Subhannah	O
Wahhaj	O
and	O
two	O
other	O
adults	O
--	O
Lucas	O
Morten	O
and	O
Jany	O
Leveille	O
.	O

All	O
have	O
been	O
charged	O
with	O
abuse	O
of	O
the	O
11	O
children	O
.	O

Morten	O
was	O
charged	O
with	O
harboring	O
a	O
fugitive	O
.	O

However	O
,	O
the	O
Badgers	O
said	O
that	O
police	B-PROP
did	I-PROP
not	I-PROP
do	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
thorough	I-PROP
job	I-PROP
searching	I-PROP
the	O
property	O
.	O

The	O
couple	O
said	O
they	O
went	O
back	O
over	O
the	O
weekend	O
after	O
they	O
found	O
out	O
Abdul	O
-	O
Ghani	O
was	O
n't	O
among	O
the	O
11	O
children	O
discovered	O
during	O
the	O
raid	O
.	O

Tanya	O
and	O
Jason	O
Badger	O
said	O
they	O
told	O
authorities	O
they	O
had	O
seen	O
a	O
boy	O
they	O
thought	O
was	O
Abdul	O
-	O
Ghani	O
Wahhaj	O
.	O

They	O
said	O
they	O
were	O
surprised	O
to	O
see	O
the	O
scene	O
was	O
not	O
taped	O
off	O
and	O
was	O
still	O
largely	O
untouched	O
.	O

They	O
found	O
two	O
guns	O
,	O
ammo	O
,	O
tactical	O
vests	O
and	O
video	O
cameras	O
that	O
police	O
initially	O
missed	O
,	O
Jason	O
Badger	O
said	O
.	O

"	O
When	O
we	O
first	O
went	O
up	O
there	O
,	O
nothing	O
was	O
overturned	O
,	O
"	O
he	O
said	O
.	O

"	O
You	O
could	O
tell	O
nobody	B-PROP
had	I-PROP
looked	I-PROP
underneath	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
nobody	I-PROP
had	I-PROP
looked	I-PROP
underneath	I-PROP
this	I-PROP
.	O
"	O

Father	O
allegedly	O
took	O
boy	O
in	O
November	O

Abdul	O
-	O
Ghani	O
's	O
mother	O
,	O
Hakima	O
Ramzi	O
,	O
could	O
not	O
be	O
reached	O
after	O
authorities	O
announced	O
the	O
discovery	O
of	O
the	O
remains	O
.	O

But	O
hours	O
earlier	O
,	O
Ramzi	O
told	O
CNN	O
she	O
had	O
no	O
idea	O
he	O
'd	O
disappear	O
with	O
their	O
son	O
for	O
nine	O
months	O
,	O
only	O
to	O
be	O
found	O
across	O
the	O
country	O
with	O
11	O
other	O
children	O

"	O
My	O
husband	O
said	O
he	O
was	O
taking	O
Abdul	O
-	O
Ghani	O
to	O
the	O
park	O
,	O
and	O
did	O
n't	O
come	O
back	O
.	O

That	O
was	O
in	O
November	O
2017	O
.	O

When	O
I	O
would	O
ask	O
him	O
where	O
he	O
was	O
,	O
he	O
said	O
he	O
was	O
on	O
his	O
way	O
,	O
he	O
was	O
coming	O
soon	O
,	O
he	O
was	O
just	O
keeping	O
him	O
for	O
the	O
night	O
.	O

But	O
I	O
have	O
n't	O
seen	O
him	O
since	O
then	O
,	O
"	O
Ramzi	O
said	O
Tuesday	O
.	O

She	O
said	O
her	O
son	O
can	O
not	O
walk	O
and	O
suffers	O
seizures	O
,	O
and	O
requires	O
constant	O
medical	O
attention	O
.	O

An	O
arrest	O
warrant	O
states	O
that	O
Wahhaj	O
"	O
wanted	B-PROP
to	I-PROP
perform	I-PROP
an	I-PROP
exorcism	I-PROP
"	I-PROP
on	I-PROP
the	O
child	O
because	O
he	O
believed	O
he	O
was	O
possessed	B-PROP
by	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
devil	I-PROP
.	O

But	O
Ramzi	O
said	O
her	O
husband	O
was	O
planning	O
to	O
perform	O
a	O
ruqya	O
--	O
an	O
Islamic	O
practice	O
involving	O
prayer	O
that	O
is	O
believed	O
to	O
help	O
rid	O
a	O
body	O
of	O
illness	O
.	O

"	O
It	O
's	O
not	O
an	O
exorcism	O
.	O

That	O
was	O
a	O
translation	O
issue	O
in	O
the	O
court	O
,	O
"	O
Ramzi	O
said	O
.	O

He	O
"	O
just	O
wanted	O
to	O
pray	O
for	O
Abdul	O
-	O
Ghani	O
to	O
get	O
better	O
.	O
"	O

Police	O
stopped	O
the	O
father	O
in	O
Alabama	O

In	O
December	O
,	O
days	O
after	O
Ramzi	O
reported	O
her	O
son	O
missing	O
,	O
the	O
child	O
's	O
father	O
was	O
involved	O
in	O
an	O
accident	O
in	O
Alabama	O
,	O
according	O
to	O
a	O
police	O
report	O
.	O

The	O
SUV	O
had	O
seven	O
children	O
--	O
but	O
none	O
of	O
them	O
was	O
listed	O
with	O
Abdul	O
-	O
Ghani	O
's	O
date	O
of	O
birth	O
.	O

Siraj	O
Wahhaj	O
is	O
accused	O
of	O
fleeing	O
Georgia	O
with	O
his	O
young	O
son	O
.	O

But	O
at	O
the	O
time	O
,	O
the	O
group	O
told	O
Alabama	O
police	O
they	O
were	O
headed	O
to	O
New	O
Mexico	O
for	O
camping	O
,	O
and	O
continued	O
on	O
their	O
way	O
.	O

Even	O
though	O
the	O
boy	O
was	O
reported	O
missing	O
,	O
there	O
was	O
no	O
child	O
abduction	O
warrant	O
against	O
Wahhaj	O
because	O
he	O
was	O
married	O
to	O
his	O
son	O
's	O
mother	O
,	O
and	O
they	O
both	O
had	O
equal	O
custody	O
,	O
Clayton	O
County	O
police	O
said	O
.	O

The	O
SUV	O
was	O
registered	O
to	O
Leveille	O
,	O
who	O
was	O
also	O
in	O
the	O
vehicle	O
.	O

She	O
would	O
later	O
become	O
one	O
of	O
the	O
five	O
adults	O
arrested	O
at	O
the	O
compound	O
in	O
New	O
Mexico	O
.	O

The	O
children	O
were	O
taken	O
into	O
protective	O
custody	O
and	O
later	O
turned	O
over	O
to	O
the	O
New	O
Mexico	O
Children	O
,	O
Youth	O
and	O
Families	O
Department	O
.	O

Documents	O
:	O
Muslims	O
Arrested	O
In	O
New	O
Mexico	O
Compound	O
Were	O
Training	O
Children	O
To	O
Carry	O
Out	O
School	O
Shootings	O

On	O
Tuesday	O
,	O
it	O
was	O
reported	O
that	O
11	O
children	O
were	O
rescued	O
from	O
an	O
Islamic	O
compound	O
in	O
New	O
Mexico	O
and	O
that	O
a	O
Muslim	O
man	O
from	O
Georgia	O
and	O
four	O
other	O
adults	O
were	O
arrested	O
.	O

Now	O
,	O
we	O
are	O
learning	O
what	O
one	O
of	O
the	O
men	O
was	O
attempting	O
to	O
do	O
with	O
these	O
children	O
.	O

He	O
was	O
attempting	O
to	O
brainwash	B-PROP
and	O
train	O
these	O
kids	O
to	O
carry	O
out	O
school	O
shootings	O
.	O

The	O
initial	O
report	O
was	O
placed	O
on	O
social	O
media	O
by	O
Taos	O
County	O
Sheriff	O
's	O
Department	O
.	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O
Will	O
Brett	O
Kavanaugh	O
be	O
confirmed	O
to	O
the	O
Supreme	O
Court	O
?	O

Will	O
Brett	O
Kavanaugh	O
be	O
confirmed	O
to	O
the	O
Supreme	O
Court	O
?	O

Will	O
Brett	O
Kavanaugh	O
be	O
confirmed	O
to	O
the	O
Supreme	O
Court	O
?	O

*	O
Yes	O
,	O
he	O
will	O
be	O
confirmed	O
.	O

No	O
,	O
he	O
will	O
not	O
be	O
confirmed	O
.	O

Email	O
*	O

Comments	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Freedom	O
Outpost	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

For	O
immediate	O
releaseAugust	O
4	O
,	O
2018Issued	O
by	O
Sheriff	O
Jerry	O
Hogrefe	O
Two	O
males	O
from	O
Georgia	O
are	O
in	O
custody	O
after	O
TCSO	O
...	O
Posted	O
by	O
Taos	O
County	O
Sheriff	O
's	O
Office	O
on	O
Saturday	O
,	O
August	O
4	O
,	O
2018	O

The	O
Atlanta	O
Journal	O
-	O
Constitution	O
reports	O
on	O
documents	O
they	O
obtained	O
which	O
claims	O
that	O
the	O
adults	O
were	O
training	O
these	O
children	O
to	O
carry	O
out	O
mass	O
shootings	O
in	O
schools	O
.	O

The	O
documents	O
claim	O
Siraj	O
Ibn	O
Wahhaj	O
and	O
his	O
co	O
-	O
defendants	O
conducted	O
weapons	O
training	O
at	O
the	O
camp	O
where	O
they	O
were	O
found	O
Friday	O
with	O
11	O
children	O
in	O
allegedly	O
“	O
third	O
world	O
”	O
conditions	O
.	O

Wahhaj	O
is	O
also	O
wanted	O
in	O
Clayton	O
County	O
in	O
a	O
child	O
abduction	O
case	O
involving	O
his	O
missing	O
son	O
,	O
Abdul	O
-	O
Ghani	O
Wahhaj	O
.	O

The	O
documents	O
,	O
which	O
suggest	O
all	O
the	O
adults	O
were	O
involved	O
in	O
the	O
training	O
,	O
say	O
a	O
person	O
serving	O
as	O
a	O
foster	O
parent	O
caring	O
for	O
one	O
of	O
the	O
kids	O
revealed	O
the	O
details	O
about	O
the	O
training	O
.	O

The	O
Associated	O
Press	O
confirms	O
the	O
report	O
:	O

BREAKING	O
:	O
Court	O
documents	O
say	O
man	O
arrested	O
at	O
New	O
Mexico	O
compound	O
was	O
training	O
children	O
to	O
commit	O
school	O
shootings	B-PROP
.	O

—	O
The	O
Associated	O
Press	O
(	O
@AP	O
)	O
August	O
8	O
,	O
2018	O

That	O
's	O
not	O
all	O
.	O

A	O
young	O
boy	O
's	O
body	O
was	O
discovered	O
at	O
the	O
site	O
as	O
well	O
.	O

AJC	O
reports	O
:	O

Siraj	O
Wahhaj	O
learned	O
Wednesday	O
that	O
prosecutors	O
want	O
him	O
held	O
without	O
bond	O
,	O
along	O
with	O
his	O
relatives	O
also	O
arrested	O
at	O
the	O
compound	O
:	O
Lucas	O
Allen	O
Morton	O
,	O
Jany	O
Leveille	O
,	O
Hujrah	O
Wahhaj	O
and	O
Subhannah	O
Wahhaj	O
.	O

Siraj	O
Wahhaj	O
is	O
also	O
accused	O
by	O
Clayton	O
County	O
authorities	O
of	O
abducting	O
his	O
son	O
,	O
Abdul	O
-	O
Ghani	O
Wahhaj	O
,	O
in	O
December	O
.	O

Authorities	O
are	O
working	O
to	O
determine	O
if	O
the	O
remains	O
of	O
a	O
young	O
boy	O
found	O
near	O
the	O
compound	O
Monday	O
are	O
Abdul	O
-	O
Ghani	O
Wahhaj	O
’s	O
.	O

Monday	O
was	O
(	O
or	O
would	O
’ve	O
been	O
)	O
the	O
child	O
’s	O
4th	O
birthday	O
.	O

The	O
court	O
filing	O
says	O
the	O
remains	O
were	O
in	O
a	O
state	O
of	O
decomposition	O
.	O

#	O
Breaking	O
:	O
A	O
child	O
's	O
remains	O
were	O
discovered	O
on	O
the	O
compound	O
.	O

Deputies	O
do	O
not	O
have	O
a	O
positive	O
ID	O
.	O

So	O
it	O
is	O
too	O
early	O
to	O
say	O
if	O
it	O
Abdul	O
-	O
Ghani	O
Wahajj	O
who	O
would	O
have	O
celebrated	O
his	O
4th	O
birthday	O
yesterday	O
.	O

https://t.co/e1RQbzDY8y	O
—	O
Ashley	O
Homrich	O
(	O
@AshleyNewsATL	O
)	O
August	O
7	O
,	O
2018	O

Well	O
,	O
all	O
of	O
this	O
should	O
make	O
Americans	O
feel	O
just	O
comfy	O
,	O
right	O
?	O

I	O
mean	O
,	O
after	O
all	O
,	O
Barack	O
Hussein	O
Obama	O
Soetoro	O
Sobarkah	O
is	O
out	O
of	O
office	O
so	O
these	O
things	O
are	O
n't	O
really	O
going	O
on	O
in	O
America	O
,	O
right	O
?	O

Here	O
's	O
the	O
thing	O
,	O
while	O
this	O
is	O
making	O
major	O
news	O
,	O
you	O
should	O
be	O
reminded	O
that	O
for	O
decades	O
,	O
at	O
least	O
22	O
verified	O
Islamic	O
jihadi	B-PROP
camps	O
have	O
existed	O
on	O
American	O
soil	O
under	O
the	O
watchful	O
,	O
or	O
maybe	O
not	O
so	O
watchful	O
,	O
eye	O
of	O
the	O
FBI	O
,	O
including	O
one	O
in	O
the	O
very	O
country	O
I	O
reside	O
in	O
within	O
eyeshot	O
of	O
a	O
nuclear	O
power	O
plant	O
.	O

Political	B-PROP
correctness	I-PROP
needs	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
thrown	I-PROP
out	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
window	I-PROP
when	O
dealing	O
with	O
those	O
who	O
take	O
the	O
Quran	O
's	O
teachings	O
seriously	O
and	O
actually	O
are	O
devout	O
,	O
not	O
radical	O
,	O
followers	O
of	O
Muhammad	O
.	O

Grandfather	O
&	O
NY	O
Imam	O
Confirms	O
Remains	O
At	O
New	O
Mexico	O
Compound	O
Were	O
Missing	O
Boy	O

A	O
New	O
York	O
mosque	O
imam	O
claims	O
that	O
after	O
speaking	O
with	O
family	O
members	O
,	O
the	O
remains	O
found	O
earlier	O
this	O
week	O
a	O
New	O
Mexico	O
compound	O
where	O
children	O
were	O
being	O
held	O
by	O
Muslims	O
and	O
trained	O
to	O
engage	O
in	O
mass	O
school	O
shootings	O
,	O
are	O
those	O
of	O
his	O
grandson	O
.	O

Abdul	O
-	O
ghani	O
Wahhaj	O
,	O
would	O
have	O
turned	O
4	O
Monday	O
.	O

According	O
to	O
prosecutors	O
,	O
he	O
was	O
kidnapped	B-PROP
from	O
his	O
mother	O
in	O
December	O
in	O
Jonesboro	O
,	O
Georgia	O
.	O

Remains	O
found	O
at	O
the	O
New	O
Mexico	O
compound	O
this	O
week	O
were	O
believed	O
to	O
be	O
the	O
boy	O
's	O
since	O
his	O
father	O
was	O
arrested	O
at	O
the	O
compound	O
.	O

While	O
New	O
Mexico	O
authorities	O
have	O
said	O
they	O
had	O
yet	O
to	O
identify	O
the	O
remains	O
,	O
Siraj	O
Wahhaj	O
,	O
the	O
boy	O
's	O
grandfather	O
claims	O
they	O
are	O
those	O
of	O
Wahhaj	O
.	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O

Will	O
Brett	O
Kavanaugh	O
be	O
confirmed	O
to	O
the	O
Supreme	O
Court	O
?	O

Will	O
Brett	O
Kavanaugh	O
be	O
confirmed	O
to	O
the	O
Supreme	O
Court	O
?	O

Will	O
Brett	O
Kavanaugh	O
be	O
confirmed	O
to	O
the	O
Supreme	O
Court	O
?	O

*	O
Yes	O
,	O
he	O
will	O
be	O
confirmed	O
.	O

No	O
,	O
he	O
will	O
not	O
be	O
confirmed	O
.	O

Email	O
*	O

Email	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Freedom	O
Outpost	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

Fox	O
News	O
reports	O
:	O

The	O
missing	O
boy	O
's	O
grandfather	O
,	O
Siraj	O
Wahhaj	O
,	O
a	O
Muslim	O
cleric	O
who	O
leads	O
a	O
well	O
-	O
known	O
New	O
York	O
City	O
mosque	O
,	O
told	O
reporters	O
he	O
had	O
learned	O
from	O
other	O
family	O
members	O
that	O
the	O
remains	O
were	O
his	O
grandson	O
's	O
.	O

The	O
imam	O
said	O
he	O
did	O
not	O
know	O
the	O
cause	O
of	O
death	O
.	O

"	O
Whoever	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
responsible	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
then	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
person	I-PROP
should	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
held	I-PROP
accountable	I-PROP
,	O
"	O
Wahhaj	O
said	O
.	O

A	O
Georgia	O
arrest	O
warrant	O
accused	O
the	O
boy	O
's	O
father	O
,	O
Siraj	O
Ibn	O
Wahhaj	O
,	O
the	O
imam	O
's	O
son	O
,	O
of	O
kidnapping	O
the	O
child	O
.	O

Authorities	O
said	O
the	O
father	O
at	O
some	O
point	O
told	O
his	O
wife	O
he	O
wanted	O
to	O
perform	B-PROP
an	I-PROP
exorcism	B-PROP
on	O
the	O
boy	O
,	O
who	O
can	O
not	O
walk	O
,	O
suffers	O
seizures	O
and	O
requires	O
constant	O
attention	O
because	O
of	O
a	O
lack	O
of	O
oxygen	O
and	O
blood	O
flow	O
at	O
birth	O
.	O

The	O
imam	O
said	O
he	O
was	O
unaware	O
of	O
the	O
training	O
of	O
the	O
children	O
for	O
school	O
shootings	O
,	O
but	O
his	O
mosque	O
has	O
been	O
known	O
to	O
attract	O
Islamic	B-PROP
jihadis	I-PROP
over	O
the	O
years	O
.	O

"	O
It	O
sounds	O
to	O
me	O
it	O
sounds	O
crazy	B-PROP
.	O

But	O
I	O
do	O
n't	O
know	O
,	O
"	O
he	O
said	O
.	O

"	O
I	O
make	O
no	O
judgments	O
yet	O
because	O
we	O
do	O
n't	O
know	O
.	O
"	O

Again	O
Fox	O
adds	O
,	O
"	O
The	O
imam	O
's	O
mosque	O
has	O
attracted	O
a	O
number	O
of	O
radicals	O
over	O
the	O
years	O
,	O
including	O
a	O
man	O
who	O
later	O
helped	O
bomb	O
the	O
World	O
Trade	O
Center	O
in	O
1993	O
.	O
"	O

Mosque	O
spokesman	O
Ali	O
Abdul	O
-	O
Karim	O
Judan	O
claims	O
that	O
the	O
narrative	O
is	O
being	O
changed	O
because	O
Muslims	O
are	O
involved	O
and	O
that	O
this	O
was	O
nothing	O
more	O
than	O
a	O
"	O
domestic	O
situation	O
.	O
"	O

"	O
None	O
of	O
the	O
charges	O
had	O
anything	O
to	O
do	O
with	O
anybody	O
teaching	O
anybody	O
shooting	O
to	O
commit	O
acts	O
of	O
terrorism	O
or	O
to	O
go	O
in	O
and	O
shoot	O
up	O
any	O
school	O
,	O
"	O
he	O
said	O
.	O

"	O
Because	O
it	O
's	O
a	O
Muslim	O
and	O
the	O
circumstances	O
that	O
are	O
surrounding	O
their	O
situation	O
,	O
they	O
want	O
to	O
change	O
the	O
narrative	O
.	O
"	O

Eleven	O
children	O
were	O
found	O
in	O
terrible	B-PROP
conditions	I-PROP
in	O
that	O
compound	O
.	O

That	O
's	O
hardly	O
a	O
"	O
domestic	O
situation	O
.	O
"	O

Furthermore	O
,	O
as	O
I	O
reported	O
on	O
Wednesday	O
,	O
both	O
the	O
Associated	O
Press	O
and	O
the	O
Atlanta	O
Constitution	O
-	O
Journal	O
reported	O
on	O
the	O
training	O
.	O

The	O
documents	O
claim	O
Siraj	O
Ibn	O
Wahhaj	O
and	O
his	O
co	O
-	O
defendants	O
conducted	O
weapons	O
training	O
at	O
the	O
camp	O
where	O
they	O
were	O
found	O
Friday	O
with	O
11	O
children	O
in	O
allegedly	O
“	O
third	O
world	O
”	O
conditions	O
.	O

Wahhaj	O
is	O
also	O
wanted	O
in	O
Clayton	O
County	O
in	O
a	O
child	O
abduction	O
case	O
involving	O
his	O
missing	O
son	O
,	O
Abdul	O
-	O
Ghani	O
Wahhaj	O
.	O

The	O
documents	O
,	O
which	O
suggest	O
all	O
the	O
adults	O
were	O
involved	O
in	O
the	O
training	O
,	O
say	O
a	O
person	O
serving	O
as	O
a	O
foster	O
parent	O
caring	O
for	O
one	O
of	O
the	O
kids	O
revealed	O
the	O
details	O
about	O
the	O
training	O
.	O

BREAKING	O
:	O
Court	O
documents	O
say	O
man	O
arrested	O
at	O
New	O
Mexico	O
compound	O
was	O
training	O
children	O
to	O
commit	O
school	O
shootings	B-PROP
.	O

—	O
The	O
Associated	O
Press	O
(	O
@AP	O
)	O
August	O
8	O
,	O
2018	O

People	O
can	O
continue	O
to	O
put	B-PROP
their	I-PROP
heads	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
sand	I-PROP
all	O
they	O
want	O
to	O
because	O
they	O
know	O
"	O
nice	B-PROP
"	I-PROP
Muslim	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
,	O
but	O
the	O
fact	O
of	O
the	O
matter	O
is	O
that	O
the	B-PROP
history	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
Islam	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
anything	B-PROP
but	I-PROP
nice	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
polite	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
just	I-PROP
or	I-PROP
holy	I-PROP
.	O

It	O
is	O
a	O
totalitarian	O
,	O
religious	O
/	O
political	O
construct	O
that	O
is	O
full	O
of	O
oppression	O
.	O

When	O
you	O
have	O
those	O
that	O
actually	O
believe	O
the	O
Koran	O
and	O
follow	O
in	O
the	O
footsteps	O
of	O
the	O
desert	O
nomad	O
Muhammad	O
,	O
then	O
you	O
will	O
not	O
find	O
radicals	O
,	O
but	O
devout	O
Muslims	O
.	O

This	O
appears	O
to	O
be	O
exactly	O
what	O
Siraj	O
Ibn	O
Wahhaj	O
and	O
others	O
arrested	O
at	O
the	O
compound	O
are	O
.	O

In	O
either	O
case	O
,	O
it	O
is	O
very	O
sad	O
that	O
a	O
little	O
boy	O
lost	O
his	O
life	O
,	O
possibly	O
at	O
the	O
hands	O
of	O
his	O
Islamic	O
father	O
and	O
others	O
.	O

Justice	O
should	O
be	O
served	O
swift	O
,	O
and	O
I	O
do	O
n't	O
mean	O
a	O
lengthy	O
jail	O
term	O
.	O

Linda	O
Sarsour	O
's	O
Mentor	O
,	O
The	O
WTC	O
Bombing	O
&	O
A	O
School	O
Shooting	O
Plot	O
In	O
New	O
Mexico	O

When	O
the	O
left	O
made	O
Linda	O
Sarsour	O
into	O
its	O
role	O
model	O
,	O
it	O
climbed	O
into	O
bed	O
with	O
the	B-PROP
worst	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
worst	I-PROP
.	O

The	O
father	O
of	O
a	O
missing	O
4-year	O
-	O
old	O
Georgia	O
boy	O
was	O
training	O
children	O
at	O
a	O
filthy	B-PROP
New	O
Mexico	O
compound	O
to	O
commit	O
school	O
shootings	O
,	O
prosecutors	O
alleged	O
in	O
court	O
documents	O
Wednesday	O
.	O

The	O
documents	O
say	O
Siraj	O
Ibn	O
Wahhaj	O
was	O
conducting	O
weapons	O
training	O
with	O
assault	O
rifles	O
at	O
the	O
compound	O
near	O
the	O
Colorado	O
border	O
that	O
was	O
raided	O
by	O
authorities	O
Friday	O
.	O

Prosecutor	O
Timothy	O
Hasson	O
filed	O
the	O
court	O
documents	O
while	O
asking	O
that	O
Wahhaj	O
be	O
held	O
without	O
bail	O
after	O
he	O
was	O
arrested	O
last	O
week	O
with	O
four	O
other	O
adults	O
facing	O
child	O
abuse	O
charges	O
.	O

Authorities	O
are	O
also	O
awaiting	O
word	O
on	O
whether	O
human	O
remains	O
found	O
at	O
the	O
site	O
were	O
those	O
of	O
Wahhaj	O
's	O
son	O
,	O
who	O
is	O
severely	B-PROP
disabled	O
and	O
went	O
missing	O
in	O
December	O
in	O
Jonesboro	O
,	O
Georgia	O
,	O
near	O
Atlanta	O
.	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O

Will	O
Brett	O
Kavanaugh	O
be	O
confirmed	O
to	O
the	O
Supreme	O
Court	O
?	O

Will	O
Brett	O
Kavanaugh	O
be	O
confirmed	O
to	O
the	O
Supreme	O
Court	O
?	O

Will	O
Brett	O
Kavanaugh	O
be	O
confirmed	O
to	O
the	O
Supreme	O
Court	O
?	O

*	O
Yes	O
,	O
he	O
will	O
be	O
confirmed	O
.	O

No	O
,	O
he	O
will	O
not	O
be	O
confirmed	O
.	O

Email	O
*	O

Email	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Freedom	O
Outpost	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

In	O
the	O
court	O
documents	O
,	O
authorities	O
said	O
a	O
foster	O
parent	O
of	O
one	O
of	O
the	O
11	O
children	O
removed	O
from	O
the	O
compound	O
had	O
told	O
authorities	O
the	O
child	O
had	O
been	O
trained	O
to	O
use	O
an	O
assault	O
rifle	O
in	O
preparation	O
for	O
a	O
school	O
shooting	O
.	O

Taos	O
County	O
Sheriff	O
Jerry	O
Hogrefe	O
previously	O
said	O
adults	O
at	O
the	O
compound	O
were	O
"	O
considered	B-PROP
extremist	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
Muslim	O
belief	O
.	O
"	O

He	O
did	O
not	O
elaborate	O
,	O
saying	O
it	O
was	O
part	O
of	O
the	O
investigation	O
.	O

CBS	O
News	O
has	O
learned	O
Wednesday	O
that	O
Wahhaj	O
is	O
the	O
son	O
of	O
a	O
Brooklyn	O
imam	O
who	O
was	O
a	O
possible	O
co	O
-	O
conspirator	O
in	O
the	O
bombing	O
of	O
the	O
World	O
Trade	O
Center	O
in	O
1993	O
--	O
but	O
was	O
never	O
charged	O
.	O

The	O
elder	O
Wahhaj	O
heads	O
the	O
Masjid	O
At	O
-	O
Taqwa	O
,	O
a	O
mosque	O
that	O
has	O
attracted	O
radical	O
speakers	O
over	O
the	O
years	O
.	O

Wahhaj	O
met	O
Mahmud	O
Abouhalima	O
when	O
he	O
came	O
to	O
the	O
site	O
to	O
raise	O
money	O
for	O
Muslims	O
in	O
Afghanistan	O
.	O

Imam	O
Whose	O
Son	O
Was	O
Training	O
School	O
Shooters	O
Blasts	B-PROP
Reporters	O
On	O
New	O
Mexico	O
Compound	O
:	O
“	O
They	B-PROP
Hate	I-PROP
Islam	I-PROP
”	I-PROP

It	O
’s	O
noteworthy	O
that	O
AP	O
would	O
carry	O
this	O
story	O
at	O
all	O
;	O
certainly	O
,	O
neither	O
AP	O
nor	O
the	O
rest	O
of	O
the	O
establishment	O
media	O
is	O
ever	O
so	O
solicitous	O
of	O
those	B-PROP
whom	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
smear	B-PROP
as	I-PROP
“	I-PROP
anti	I-PROP
-	I-PROP
Muslim	I-PROP
”	O
to	O
allow	O
us	O
to	O
tell	O
our	O
side	O
of	O
the	O
story	O
.	O

But	O
the	O
imam	O
Siraj	O
Wahhaj	O
is	O
here	O
engaging	O
in	O
some	O
“	O
war	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
deceit	I-PROP
”	I-PROP
action	I-PROP
.	O

His	O
son	O
was	O
on	O
the	O
radar	O
of	O
counterterror	O
officials	O
for	O
13	O
years	O
on	O
suspicion	O
of	O
jihad	O
activity	O
.	O

He	O
was	O
training	O
school	O
shooters	O
.	O

But	B-PROP
of	I-PROP
course	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
’s	I-PROP
all	I-PROP
because	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
journalists	I-PROP
who	I-PROP
supposedly	I-PROP
hate	I-PROP
Islam	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
Muslims	I-PROP
.	O

Ever	B-PROP
the	I-PROP
victim	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O

Will	O
Brett	O
Kavanaugh	O
be	O
confirmed	O
to	O
the	O
Supreme	O
Court	O
?	O

Will	O
Brett	O
Kavanaugh	O
be	O
confirmed	O
to	O
the	O
Supreme	O
Court	O
?	O

Will	O
Brett	O
Kavanaugh	O
be	O
confirmed	O
to	O
the	O
Supreme	O
Court	O
?	O

*	O
Yes	O
,	O
he	O
will	O
be	O
confirmed	O
.	O

No	O
,	O
he	O
will	O
not	O
be	O
confirmed	O
.	O

Email	O
*	O

Name	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Freedom	O
Outpost	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

“	O
The	O
Latest	O
:	O
Compound	O
incident	O
called	O
anti	O
-	O
Muslim	O
propaganda	O
,	O
”	O
Associated	O
Press	O
,	O
August	O
10	O
,	O
2018	O
(	O
thanks	O
to	O
the	O
Geller	O
Report	O
)	O
:	O

TAOS	O
,	O
N.M.	O
(	O
AP	O
)	O
—	O
The	O
Latest	O
on	O
11	O
children	O
found	O
living	O
in	O
a	O
filthy	B-PROP
,	I-PROP
makeshift	B-PROP
compound	I-PROP
in	O
New	O
Mexico	O
(	O
all	O
times	O
local	O
)	O
:	O
4	O
p.m.	O
A	O
representative	O
of	O
a	O
New	O
York	O
mosque	O
says	O
the	O
raid	O
of	O
a	O
ramshackle	B-PROP
compound	I-PROP
in	O
New	O
Mexico	O
is	O
being	O
used	O
as	O
propaganda	O
against	O
Muslims	O
.	O

Ali	O
Abdul	O
-	O
Karim	O
Judan	O
,	O
a	O
spokesman	O
for	O
the	O
mosque	O
,	O
said	O
in	O
a	O
video	O
posted	O
Thursday	O
on	O
Facebook	O
that	O
the	O
incident	O
was	O
a	O
domestic	O
situation	O
that	O
has	O
nothing	O
to	O
do	O
with	O
extremism	O
.	O

The	O
grandfather	O
of	O
a	O
severely	B-PROP
disabled	I-PROP
boy	O
,	O
who	O
authorities	O
say	O
was	O
kidnapped	B-PROP
by	O
his	O
father	O
and	O
taken	O
to	O
the	O
compound	O
,	O
has	O
said	O
remains	O
found	O
there	O
are	O
those	O
of	O
his	O
grandson	O
.	O

The	O
man	O
is	O
an	O
imam	O
at	O
the	O
New	O
York	O
mosque	O
.	O

Judan	O
also	O
cast	O
doubt	O
on	O
a	O
contention	O
by	O
prosecutors	O
that	O
children	O
found	O
at	O
the	O
site	O
were	O
being	O
trained	O
to	O
use	O
assault	O
rifles	O
in	O
preparation	O
for	O
school	O
shootings	B-PROP
.	O

He	O
said	O
authorities	O
should	O
not	O
have	O
made	O
that	O
claim	O
without	O
stronger	O
evidence	O
.	O

The	O
mosque	O
has	O
attracted	O
radicals	B-PROP
over	O
the	O
years	O
,	O
including	O
a	O
man	O
who	O
later	O
helped	B-PROP
bomb	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
World	I-PROP
Trade	I-PROP
Center	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
1993	I-PROP
…	I-PROP
.	O

Article	O
posted	O
with	O
permission	O
from	O
Robert	O
Spencer	O

Unbelievable	B-PROP
!	I-PROP

Sharia	O
New	O
Mexico	O
:	O
Islamic	O
compound	O
jihadis	O
RELEASED	O
on	O
bond	O
after	O
charges	O
of	O
“	O
Islamophobia	O
”	O
and	O
“	O
racism	O
”	O
(	O
Islam	O
is	O
not	O
a	O
race	O
)	O

Editor	O
's	O
Note	O
:	O
Talk	B-PROP
about	I-PROP
injustice	I-PROP
!	O

There	O
were	O
remains	O
of	O
a	O
4-year	O
-	O
old	O
boy	O
found	O
there	O
,	O
who	O
allegedly	O
died	O
while	O
they	O
were	O
performing	O
some	O
sort	O
of	O
Islamic	O
ritual	O
over	O
him	O
.	O

The	O
Bundys	O
and	O
their	O
supporters	O
got	O
nearly	O
two	O
years	O
in	O
jail	O
and	O
no	O
one	O
hurt	O
a	O
single	O
person	O
!	O

Shame	B-PROP
on	I-PROP
those	I-PROP
who	I-PROP
are	I-PROP
supposed	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
uphold	I-PROP
law	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
justice	I-PROP
!	O

Shame	B-PROP
!	O

Taos	O
County	O
Sheriff	O
Jerry	O
Hogrefe	O
testified	O
that	O
they	O
found	O
children	O
holding	O
boxes	O
of	O
ammunition	O
,	O
and	O
that	O
one	O
child	O
was	O
found	O
with	O
a	O
gun	O
…	O
.	O

Because	B-PROP
sharia	I-PROP
trumps	I-PROP
dead	I-PROP
children	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
school	I-PROP
shooting	I-PROP
training	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
kidnapping	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
jihad	I-PROP
training	I-PROP
.	O

The	O
children	O
discovered	O
at	O
an	O
“	O
extremist	B-PROP
Muslim	I-PROP
”	O
compound	O
in	O
New	O
Mexico	O
earlier	O
this	O
month	O
were	O
both	O
trained	O
to	O
use	O
firearms	O
and	O
taught	O
multiple	O
tactical	O
techniques	O
in	O
order	O
to	O
kill	B-PROP
teachers	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
law	I-PROP
enforcement	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
other	I-PROP
institution	I-PROP
…	O
.	O

state	O
prosecutors	O
said	O
on	O
Monday	O
.	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O

Will	O
Brett	O
Kavanaugh	O
be	O
confirmed	O
to	O
the	O
Supreme	O
Court	O
?	O

Will	O
Brett	O
Kavanaugh	O
be	O
confirmed	O
to	O
the	O
Supreme	O
Court	O
?	O

Will	O
Brett	O
Kavanaugh	O
be	O
confirmed	O
to	O
the	O
Supreme	O
Court	O
?	O

*	O
Yes	O
,	O
he	O
will	O
be	O
confirmed	O
.	O

No	O
,	O
he	O
will	O
not	O
be	O
confirmed	O
.	O

Email	O
*	O

Comments	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Freedom	O
Outpost	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

“	O
Islamophobia	O
”	O
is	O
a	B-PROP
thought	I-PROP
crushing	I-PROP
device	I-PROP
designed	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
silence	I-PROP
any	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
critics	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
criticism	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
Islam	I-PROP
.	O

It	O
is	O
the	O
tool	O
in	O
which	O
the	O
ummah	O
enforces	O
sharia	O
blasphemy	O
laws	O
in	O
the	O
West	O
.	O

Waco	O
–	O
the	B-PROP
Feds	I-PROP
killed	O
’em	O
all	O
.	O

Shot	O
it	O
up	O
and	O
burned	O
it	O
down	O
.	O

Fast	O
forward	O
to	O
Islam	O
in	O
America	O
—	O

New	O
Mexico	O
compound	O
jihadis	O
released	O
on	O
bond	O
after	O
charges	O
of	O
racism	O
and	O
“	O
Islamophobia	O
”	O
“	O
THEIR	O
LAWYER	O
ARGUED	O
THAT	O
THERE	O
WAS	O
A	O
DOUBLE	O
STANDARD	O
IN	O
THE	O
CASE	O
BECAUSE	O
HIS	O
CLIENTS	O
WERE	O
MUSLIMS	O
.	O

HE	B-PROP
ARGUED	I-PROP
THAT	I-PROP
IF	I-PROP
THEY	I-PROP
HAD	I-PROP
BEEN	I-PROP
CHRISTIAN	I-PROP
AND	I-PROP
WHITE	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
‘	I-PROP
WE	I-PROP
MIGHT	I-PROP
NOT	I-PROP
BE	I-PROP
HERE	I-PROP
TODAY	I-PROP
.	O
’	O
”	O
Bu	O
Jihad	O
Watch	O
,	O
August	O
13	O
,	O
2018	O
:	O
Seriously	B-PROP
?	I-PROP

If	O
they	O
had	O
been	O
Christian	O
and	O
white	O
,	O
stockpiling	O
weapons	O
and	O
plotting	O
school	O
shootings	O
,	O
with	O
the	O
ringleader	O
being	O
the	O
son	O
of	O
one	O
of	O
the	O
most	O
respected	O
Christian	O
preachers	O
in	O
the	O
country	O
,	O
there	O
would	O
n’t	O
have	O
been	O
news	O
coverage	O
of	O
anything	O
else	O
for	O
weeks	O
.	O

There	O
would	O
have	O
been	O
feature	O
stories	O
in	O
the	O
New	O
York	O
Times	O
,	O
the	O
Washington	O
Post	O
,	O
and	O
the	O
Wall	O
Street	O
Journal	O
.	O

CNN	O
and	O
MSNBC	O
would	O
be	O
running	O
special	O
reports	O
on	O
toxic	B-PROP
Christianity	I-PROP
and	O
the	O
crisis	O
in	O
the	O
churches	O
.	O

This	O
incident	O
,	O
on	O
the	O
other	O
hand	O
,	O
received	O
very	O
little	O
coverage	O
,	O
and	O
hardly	O
any	O
that	O
touched	O
on	O
the	O
Islamic	O
aspects	O
of	O
the	O
story	O
.	O

But	O
Muslim	O
claims	O
of	O
victimhood	O
are	O
so	O
polished	O
and	O
reflexive	O
by	O
now	O
,	O
and	O
the	O
Leftist	O
acceptance	O
of	O
them	O
so	O
matter	O
-	O
of	O
-	O
fact	O
and	O
instinctive	O
,	O
that	O
Judge	O
Sarah	O
Backus	O
fell	O
right	O
into	O
line	O
.	O

We	B-PROP
can	I-PROP
only	I-PROP
hope	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
no	I-PROP
one	I-PROP
dies	I-PROP
because	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
her	I-PROP
folly	I-PROP
.	O

“	O
Breaking	O
:	O
Judge	O
makes	O
stunning	B-PROP
decision	I-PROP
in	O
Muslim	O
compound	O
case	O
after	O
charges	O
of	O
racism	O
,	O
”	O
by	O
Carlos	O
Garcia	O
,	O
The	O
Blaze	O
,	O
August	O
13	O
,	O
2018	O
(	O
thanks	O
to	O
Robert	O
)	O
:	O
In	O
a	O
hearing	O
Monday	O
,	O
a	O
New	O
Mexico	O
judge	O
found	O
that	O
suspects	O
in	O
a	O
bizarre	O
child	O
abuse	O
case	O
were	O
not	O
a	O
danger	O
to	O
the	O
public	O
,	O
and	O
released	O
them	O
on	O
bond	O
.	O

Defense	O
attorney	O
blames	O
Islamophobia	O
Two	O
Muslim	O
men	O
and	O
three	O
women	O
are	O
charged	O
with	O
11	O
counts	O
of	O
child	O
abuse	O
each	O
after	O
police	O
raided	O
their	O
compound	O
in	O
New	O
Mexico	O
and	O
discovered	O
11	O
malnourished	O
children	O
living	O
in	O
squalor	O
.	O

Their	O
lawyer	O
argued	O
that	O
there	O
was	O
a	O
double	O
standard	O
in	O
the	O
case	O
because	O
his	O
clients	O
were	O
Muslims	O
.	O

He	O
argued	O
that	O
if	B-PROP
they	I-PROP
had	I-PROP
been	I-PROP
Christian	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
white	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
“	I-PROP
we	I-PROP
might	I-PROP
not	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
here	I-PROP
today	I-PROP
.	I-PROP
”	I-PROP
Despite	O
law	O
enforcement	O
authorities	O
saying	O
that	O
they	O
believe	O
that	O
the	O
children	O
were	O
being	O
trained	O
to	O
attack	O
innocents	B-PROP
,	O
and	O
that	O
the	O
adults	O
were	O
radicalized	O
,	O
Judge	O
Sarah	O
Backus	O
released	O
the	O
suspects	O
.	O

Prosecutors	O
also	O
said	O
they	O
obtained	O
a	O
letter	O
from	O
one	O
of	O
the	O
suspects	O
telling	O
his	O
brother	O
to	O
come	O
to	O
the	O
compound	O
and	O
die	B-PROP
like	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
martyr	I-PROP
.	O

The	O
lawyer	O
for	O
the	O
suspects	O
said	O
that	O
there	O
was	O
no	O
evidence	O
that	O
they	O
were	O
planning	O
any	O
kind	O
of	O
attacks	O
.	O

Taos	O
County	O
Sheriff	O
Jerry	O
Hogrefe	O
testified	O
that	O
they	O
found	O
children	O
holding	O
boxes	O
of	O
ammunition	O
,	O
and	O
that	O
one	O
child	O
was	O
found	O
with	O
a	O
gun	O
…	O

Article	O
posted	O
with	O
permission	O
from	O
Pamela	O
Geller	O

The	O
Brennan	O
-	O
Rosenstein	O
-	O
Mueller	O
–	O
Comey	O
-	O
Presstitute	O

Russiagate	O
is	O
an	O
orchestration	O
.	O

It	O
is	O
the	O
response	O
of	O
the	O
military	O
/	O
security	O
complex	O
to	O
Donald	O
Trump	O
’s	O
presidential	O
campaign	O
statement	O
that	O
he	O
intended	O
to	O
normalize	O
relations	O
with	O
Russia	O
.	O

Trump	O
recognized	O
that	O
the	O
extreme	B-PROP
Russiaphobia	I-PROP
,	O
which	O
the	B-PROP
hegemonic	B-PROP
neoconservatives	I-PROP
had	B-PROP
whipped	B-PROP
up	I-PROP
since	O
Vladimir	O
Putin	O
’s	O
statement	O
at	O
the	O
Munich	O
Security	O
Conference	O
in	O
2007	O
that	O
Russia	O
was	O
a	B-PROP
sovereign	I-PROP
country	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
intended	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
act	I-PROP
like	I-PROP
one	I-PROP
,	O
was	O
a	B-PROP
threat	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
life	I-PROP
on	I-PROP
earth	I-PROP
.	O

The	O
neoconservatives	O
,	O
who	O
have	O
controlled	O
US	O
foreign	O
policy	O
since	O
the	O
Clinton	O
regime	O
,	O
are	O
unwilling	O
to	O
accept	O
limitations	O
by	O
any	O
other	O
country	O
on	O
Washington	O
’s	O
ability	O
to	O
act	O
unilaterally	O
.	O

When	O
Putin	O
blocked	O
the	O
Obama	O
regime	O
’s	O
invasion	O
of	O
Syria	O
and	O
bombing	O
of	O
Iran	O
,	O
the	O
neoconservatives	O
paid	O
Putin	O
back	O
by	O
using	O
NGOs	O
and	O
Ukranian	O
politicians	O
financed	O
by	O
Washington	O
to	O
overthrow	O
the	O
democratically	O
elected	O
government	O
of	O
Ukraine	O
and	O
to	O
put	O
in	O
office	O
a	O
government	O
hostile	O
to	O
Russia	O
.	O

The	O
intent	O
was	O
to	O
use	O
Ukraine	O
,	O
a	O
Russian	O
province	O
for	O
more	O
than	O
three	O
centuries	O
,	O
to	O
create	O
problems	O
for	O
Russia	O
that	O
would	O
absorb	O
Russia	O
’s	O
attention	O
and	O
return	O
a	O
free	O
hand	O
to	O
Washington	O
and	O
Israel	O
in	O
the	O
Middle	O
East	O
and	O
also	O
to	O
evict	O
Russia	O
from	O
its	O
Black	O
Sea	O
naval	O
base	O
in	O
Crimea	O
.	O

When	O
Crimeans	O
voted	O
to	O
reunite	O
with	O
Russia	O
,	O
Washington	B-PROP
misrepresented	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
democratic	I-PROP
result	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
self	I-PROP
-	I-PROP
determination	I-PROP
as	O
a	O
“	O
Russian	B-PROP
invasion	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
annexation	I-PROP
of	O
Crimea	O
.	O
”	O
Such	B-PROP
an	I-PROP
extraordinary	I-PROP
misrepresentation	I-PROP
destroyed	O
any	O
remaining	O
confidence	O
the	O
Russian	O
government	O
might	O
have	O
had	O
in	O
Washington	O
’s	O
veracity	O
.	O

The	O
Neoconservative	O
Th	O
...	O
Dr.	O
Paul	O
Craig	O
Roberts	O
Best	O
Price	O
:	O
$	O
11.96	O
Buy	O
New	O
$	O
19.34	O
(	O
as	O
of	O
10:15	O
EDT	O
-	O
Details	O
)	O
From	O
here	O
relations	O
between	O
the	O
two	O
nuclear	O
powers	O
deteriorated	O
rapidly	O
.	O

As	O
I	O
and	O
Stephen	O
Cohen	O
have	O
emphasized	O
,	O
the	O
danger	O
of	O
nuclear	O
war	O
is	O
today	O
far	O
higher	O
than	O
ever	O
during	O
the	O
long	O
Cold	O
War	O
as	O
there	O
is	O
today	O
no	O
trust	O
whatsoever	O
between	O
the	O
two	O
governments	O
.	O

Donald	B-PROP
Trump	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
totally	B-PROP
correct	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
nuclear	B-PROP
war	I-PROP
would	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
terminable	I-PROP
event	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
nothing	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
more	I-PROP
important	I-PROP
than	I-PROP
restoring	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
cooperative	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
mutually	I-PROP
respectful	I-PROP
relationship	I-PROP
between	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
US	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
Russia	I-PROP
.	O

The	O
problem	O
is	O
that	O
the	O
military	O
/	O
security	O
complex	O
sees	O
it	O
differently	O
.	O

After	O
70	O
years	O
of	O
entrenchment	O
the	O
military	O
/	O
security	O
complex	O
is	O
an	O
independent	O
political	O
force	O
.	O

President	O
Eisenhower	O
warned	O
the	O
American	O
people	O
about	O
this	O
likely	O
outcome	O
in	O
1961	O
to	O
no	O
avail	O
.	O

From	O
the	O
standpoint	O
of	O
the	O
military	O
/	O
security	O
complex	O
,	O
the	O
problem	O
of	O
normalizing	O
relations	O
with	O
Russia	O
is	O
that	O
it	O
downgrades	O
the	O
“	O
Russian	O
threat	O
”	O
that	O
is	O
so	O
essential	O
to	O
the	O
$	O
1,000	O
billion	O
annual	O
budget	O
of	O
the	O
military	O
/	O
security	O
complex	O
and	O
the	O
power	O
that	O
such	O
a	O
massive	O
budget	O
conveys	O
.	O

Only	O
16	O
countries	O
in	O
the	O
world	O
out	O
of	O
195	O
countries	O
have	O
a	O
GDP	O
greater	O
than	O
$	O
1,000	O
billion	O
.	O

The	O
military	O
/	O
security	O
complex	O
is	O
large	O
enough	O
to	O
be	O
a	O
member	O
of	O
the	O
G-20	O
and	O
to	O
have	O
its	O
own	O
currency	O
and	O
military	O
.	O

Obama	O
’s	O
CIA	O
director	O
,	O
John	O
Brennan	O
,	O
quickly	O
organized	O
the	O
Russiagate	O
conspiracy	O
against	O
Trump	O
.	O

Comey	O
,	O
Rosenstein	O
,	O
Clapper	O
,	O
Mueller	O
,	O
McCabe	O
,	O
Peter	O
Strzok	O
and	O
others	O
were	O
,	O
and	O
are	O
,	O
apparently	O
implicated	O
as	O
active	O
participants	O
in	O
orchestrating	O
an	O
alleged	O
collusion	O
between	O
Donald	O
Trump	O
and	O
Vladimir	O
Putin	O
to	O
steal	O
the	O
US	O
presidential	O
election	O
.	O

Based	O
on	O
deception	O
of	O
the	O
FISA	O
Court	O
,	O
warrants	O
were	O
illegally	O
obtained	O
that	O
became	O
the	O
basis	O
for	O
appointing	O
Mueller	O
as	O
a	O
special	O
prosecutor	O
to	O
construct	O
by	O
whatever	O
means	O
possible	O
a	O
case	O
against	O
President	O
Trump	O
.	O

After	O
two	O
years	O
the	O
only	O
evidence	O
we	O
have	O
of	O
Russiagate	O
is	O
that	O
it	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
conspiracy	I-PROP
against	I-PROP
President	I-PROP
Trump	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
American	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
.	O

Indeed	B-PROP
,	I-PROP
Mueller	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
fully	I-PROP
aware	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
there	I-PROP
was	I-PROP
no	I-PROP
Trump	I-PROP
-	I-PROP
Putin	I-PROP
conspiracy	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
has	I-PROP
not	I-PROP
bothered	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
look	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
any	I-PROP
evidence	I-PROP
as	I-PROP
there	I-PROP
can	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
no	I-PROP
evidence	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
something	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
did	I-PROP
not	I-PROP
happen	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

He	B-PROP
pulled	I-PROP
out	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
hat	I-PROP
some	I-PROP
phony	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
meaningless	I-PROP
indictments	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
some	I-PROP
Russians	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
order	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
make	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
look	I-PROP
like	I-PROP
there	I-PROP
was	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
conspiracy	I-PROP
without	I-PROP
having	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
prove	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
but	O
his	O
main	O
focus	O
has	O
been	O
on	O
framing	O
Paul	O
Manafort	O
.	O

Mueller	O
’s	O
investigation	O
of	O
Manafort	O
has	O
nothing	O
to	O
do	O
with	O
the	O
Russiagate	O
story	O
line	O
.	O

Manafort	O
’s	O
alleged	O
crimes	O
are	O
far	O
outside	O
Mueller	O
’s	O
mandate	O
and	O
took	O
place	O
,	O
if	O
they	O
did	O
,	O
years	O
before	O
the	O
alleged	O
events	O
of	O
Russiagate	O
.	O

Manafort	O
’s	O
conviction	O
by	O
a	O
jury	O
on	O
8	O
of	O
the	O
18	O
counts	O
is	O
being	O
misrepresented	O
by	O
the	B-PROP
Trump	I-PROP
-	I-PROP
hating	I-PROP
presstitutes	I-PROP
as	O
vindication	O
of	O
the	O
Russiagate	O
investigation	O
and	O
as	O
“	O
A	O
dark	B-PROP
day	O
for	O
Trump	O
,	O
”	O
with	O
the	O
presstitutes	O
suggesting	O
a	O
Watergate	O
parallel	O
that	O
will	O
force	O
Trump	O
from	O
office	O
.	O

Manafort	O
was	O
found	O
guilty	O
not	O
of	O
Russiagate	O
,	O
but	O
of	O
income	O
tax	O
evasion	O
and	O
misrepresenting	O
his	O
financial	O
position	O
on	O
a	O
loan	O
application	O
.	O

We	O
do	O
not	O
know	O
if	O
Manafort	O
is	O
guilty	O
or	O
is	O
simply	O
a	B-PROP
victim	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
Mueller	I-PROP
’s	I-PROP
frameup	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
an	I-PROP
incompetent	I-PROP
jury	I-PROP
.	O

American	B-PROP
juries	I-PROP
are	I-PROP
notoriously	I-PROP
incompetent	I-PROP
,	O
which	O
is	O
why	O
97	O
%	O
of	O
felony	O
indictments	O
are	O
settled	O
with	O
a	O
plea	O
bargain	O
.	O

Even	O
the	O
innocent	O
had	O
rather	O
work	O
out	O
a	O
plea	O
arrangement	O
and	O
admit	O
to	O
something	O
that	O
they	O
did	O
not	O
do	O
than	O
to	O
face	O
an	O
insouciant	B-PROP
American	I-PROP
jury	O
.	O

Remember	O
the	O
jury	O
that	O
condemned	O
the	O
survivors	O
of	O
the	O
FBI	O
’s	O
massacre	O
of	O
the	O
Branch	O
Davidians	O
in	O
Waco	O
,	O
Texas	O
,	O
to	O
be	O
locked	O
away	O
for	O
many	O
years	O
so	O
that	O
they	O
could	O
not	O
talk	O
and	O
tell	O
of	O
the	O
mass	O
murder	O
inflicted	O
on	O
a	O
religious	O
group	O
by	O
the	O
FBI	O
.	O

It	O
is	O
unclear	O
how	O
much	O
of	O
a	O
crime	O
it	O
can	O
be	O
to	O
misrepresent	O
your	O
financial	O
position	O
on	O
a	O
loan	O
application	O
when	O
one	B-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
causes	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
mortgage	I-PROP
-	I-PROP
backed	I-PROP
derivative	I-PROP
crisis	I-PROP
was	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
misrepresentation	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
mortgage	I-PROP
applicants	I-PROP
on	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
loan	I-PROP
documents	I-PROP
by	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
companies	I-PROP
issuing	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
mortgages	I-PROP
.	O

Instead	O
of	O
prosecution	O
,	O
Washington	O
relied	O
on	O
the	O
Federal	O
Reserve	O
to	O
bail	O
out	O
the	O
banks	O
holding	O
the	O
misrepresented	O
loans	O
.	O

Income	O
tax	O
invasion	O
is	O
the	O
purview	O
of	O
the	O
IRS	O
,	O
not	O
of	O
a	O
special	O
prosecutor	O
who	O
is	O
supposed	O
to	O
be	O
looking	O
for	O
evidence	O
of	O
a	O
Trump	B-PROP
-	I-PROP
Putin	I-PROP
conspiracy	I-PROP
.	O

The	O
Russia	O
Hoax	O
:	O
The	O
I	O
...	O
Gregg	O
Jarrett	O
Best	O
Price	O
:	O
$	O
13.99	O
Buy	O
New	O
$	O
12.63	O
(	O
as	O
of	O
08:40	O
EDT	O
-	O
Details	O
)	O

So	O
,	O
why	O
did	O
Mueller	O
focus	O
on	O
Manafort	O
?	O

Let	O
Harvard	O
Law	O
Professor	O
Alan	O
Dershowitz	O
tell	O
you	O
:	O

“	O
All	O
the	O
Special	O
Counsel	O
needs	O
,	O
in	O
order	O
to	O
charge	O
a	O
subject	O
of	O
an	O
investigation	O
with	O
lying	O
to	O
a	O
prosecutor	O
,	O
is	O
a	O
single	O
witnesses	O
willing	O
to	O
contradict	O
the	O
subject	O
.	O

“	O
The	O
witness	O
may	O
not	O
only	O
be	O
“	O
singing	O
,	O
”	O
he	O
may	O
also	O
be	O
“	O
composing	O
”	O
—	O
that	O
is	O
,	O
making	B-PROP
up	I-PROP
or	I-PROP
embellishing	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
story	I-PROP
because	B-PROP
he	I-PROP
knows	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
better	I-PROP
his	I-PROP
story	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
better	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
deal	I-PROP
.	O

“	O
Under	O
federal	O
law	O
,	O
the	O
testimony	O
of	O
such	O
a	O
“	O
flipped	B-PROP
witness	I-PROP
”	O
need	O
not	O
be	O
corroborated	O
in	O
order	O
to	O
secure	O
a	O
conviction	O
.	O

“	O
Even	O
one	O
question	O
that	O
results	O
in	O
an	O
answer	O
that	O
is	O
contradicted	O
by	O
one	O
witness	O
would	O
be	O
enough	O
to	O
spring	O
the	O
perjury	O
trap	O
.	O
”	O

President	O
Trump	O
has	O
made	O
various	O
statements	O
disputing	O
the	O
orchestrated	O
Russiagate	O
accusations	O
that	O
,	O
if	O
Manafort	O
as	O
witness	O
for	O
the	O
Special	O
Prosecutor	O
contradicted	O
,	O
could	O
send	O
the	O
President	O
of	O
the	O
United	O
States	O
to	O
prison	O
for	O
perjury	O
.	O

Knowing	O
this	O
,	O
Mueller	O
,	O
in	B-PROP
my	I-PROP
opinion	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
proven	I-PROP
corrupt	I-PROP
person	I-PROP
,	O
decided	O
to	O
put	B-PROP
the	I-PROP
squeeze	I-PROP
on	O
Manafort	O
in	O
order	O
to	O
force	O
Manafort	O
to	O
save	O
himself	O
by	O
giving	O
false	O
testimony	O
against	O
Trump	O
.	O

This	O
tactic	O
is	O
used	O
every	O
day	O
by	O
state	O
,	O
local	O
,	O
and	O
federal	O
prosecutors	O
.	O

Americans	B-PROP
who	O
believe	O
the	O
indictments	O
and	O
convictions	O
are	O
unaware	O
that	O
97	O
%	O
of	O
the	O
time	O
the	O
convictions	O
rest	O
on	O
self	O
-	O
incrimination	O
in	O
order	O
to	O
avoid	O
worse	O
punishment	O
.	O

In	O
Manafort	O
’s	O
case	O
it	O
did	O
n’t	O
,	O
or	O
has	O
n’t	O
,	O
worked	O
.	O

Yet	O
.	O

Manafort	O
is	O
due	O
for	O
a	O
second	O
trial	O
,	O
this	O
time	O
for	O
allegely	O
acting	O
as	O
an	O
unregistered	O
foreign	O
agent	O
for	O
Ukrainian	O
interests	O
and	O
for	O
making	O
false	O
statements	O
not	O
under	O
oath	O
to	O
the	O
US	O
government	O
.	O

Reportedly	O
,	O
Manafort	O
is	O
being	O
held	O
in	O
solitary	O
confinement	O
,	O
a	O
form	O
of	O
torture	O
designed	O
to	O
break	B-PROP
a	O
person	O
’s	O
spirit	O
.	O

Like	O
Manafort	O
’s	O
first	O
trial	O
,	O
his	O
second	O
trial	O
has	O
nothing	O
whatsoever	O
to	O
do	O
with	O
Russiagate	O
,	O
but	B-PROP
you	I-PROP
will	I-PROP
never	I-PROP
learn	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
from	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
presstitute	I-PROP
media	I-PROP
or	I-PROP
from	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
Democratic	I-PROP
Party	I-PROP
.	O

Manafort	O
can	O
still	O
be	O
coerced	O
to	O
say	O
something	O
that	O
can	O
be	O
used	O
to	O
drive	O
Trump	O
from	O
office	O
.	O

What	O
about	O
Michael	O
Cohen	O
,	O
a	O
former	O
attorney	O
for	O
Trump	O
?	O

Mueller	O
saw	O
no	O
value	O
in	O
the	O
Cohen	O
case	O
and	O
passed	O
it	O
off	O
to	O
a	O
regular	O
US	O
attorney	O
to	O
prosecute	O
.	O

Therefore	O
,	O
it	O
would	O
appear	O
not	O
to	O
be	O
part	O
of	O
the	O
Russiagate	O
investigation	O
.	O

Cohen	O
avoided	O
a	O
jury	O
and	O
said	O
he	O
was	O
guilty	O
of	O
five	O
counts	O
of	O
personal	O
income	O
tax	O
evasion	O
,	O
one	O
count	O
of	O
making	O
a	O
false	O
statement	O
to	O
a	O
financial	O
institution	O
in	O
order	O
to	O
get	O
a	O
loan	O
,	O
and	O
two	O
counts	O
related	O
to	O
illegal	O
campaign	O
contributions	O
.	O

With	O
regard	O
to	O
the	O
campagin	O
contributions	O
,	O
he	O
contradicted	O
his	O
previous	O
statements	O
.	O

He	O
said	O
that	O
on	O
Trump	O
’s	O
instruction	O
,	O
he	O
paid	O
off	O
two	O
women	O
who	O
were	O
claiming	O
sexual	O
affairs	O
with	O
Trump	O
.	O

The	O
intricacies	O
of	O
American	O
laws	O
relating	O
to	O
politics	O
are	O
often	O
unclear	O
.	O

Apparently	O
,	O
the	O
charge	O
is	O
that	O
Cohen	O
used	O
monies	O
raised	O
for	O
a	O
political	O
campaign	O
to	O
pay	O
off	O
two	O
women	O
,	O
who	O
saw	O
and	O
capitalized	O
on	O
an	O
opportunity	O
to	O
extort	O
Trump	O
for	O
money	O
,	O
and	O
this	O
was	O
an	O
illegal	O
use	O
of	O
the	O
money	O
.	O

Why	O
a	O
lawyer	O
would	O
pay	O
off	O
women	O
,	O
whose	O
stories	O
might	O
or	O
might	O
not	O
be	O
true	O
,	O
in	O
an	O
illegal	O
way	O
when	O
his	B-PROP
client	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
multi	I-PROP
-	I-PROP
billionaire	I-PROP
does	I-PROP
n’t	I-PROP
make	I-PROP
much	I-PROP
sense	O
.	O

But	O
these	O
are	O
not	O
the	O
kind	O
of	O
questions	O
that	O
the	O
presstitutes	O
are	O
interested	O
in	O
.	O

Nevertheless	O
,	O
Cohen	O
’s	O
plea	O
is	O
associated	O
with	O
a	O
case	O
brought	O
by	O
another	O
prosecutor	O
,	O
not	O
by	O
Special	O
Prosecutor	O
Mueller	O
.	O

I	O
am	O
not	O
sufficiently	O
familiar	O
with	O
US	O
legal	O
procedures	O
to	O
be	O
able	O
to	O
say	O
how	O
this	O
gets	O
brought	O
back	O
into	O
Mueller	O
’s	O
investigation	O
.	O

The	O
facts	O
are	O
this	O
:	O

The	O
US	O
military	O
/	O
security	O
complex	O
will	O
not	O
permit	O
any	O
normalization	O
of	O
relations	O
with	O
Russia	O
.	O

Period	O
.	O

At	B-PROP
some	I-PROP
point	I-PROP
Putin	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
Lavrov	I-PROP
and	O
the	B-PROP
idiot	I-PROP
Russian	I-PROP
Atlanticist	I-PROP
Integrationists	I-PROP
will	I-PROP
have	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
acknowledge	I-PROP
this	I-PROP
fact	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
or	I-PROP
Russia	I-PROP
will	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
destroyed	I-PROP
.	O

Trump	O
,	O
by	O
declaring	O
normalization	O
of	O
relations	O
as	O
one	O
of	O
his	O
two	O
principal	O
goals	O
for	O
his	O
presidency	O
,	O
earned	O
the	O
emnity	O
of	O
the	O
powerful	O
military	O
/	O
security	O
complex	O
.	O

By	O
defeating	O
Hillary	O
for	O
the	O
presidency	O
,	O
Trump	O
inflamed	B-PROP
the	I-PROP
US	I-PROP
media	I-PROP
’s	I-PROP
hatred	I-PROP
,	O
committed	O
as	O
the	O
presstitutes	O
are	O
to	O
Identity	O
Politics	O
and	O
hatred	O
of	O
the	O
“	O
white	B-PROP
male	I-PROP
oppressors	I-PROP
”	I-PROP
who	O
elected	O
Trump	O
.	O

Trump	O
will	O
never	O
be	O
forgiven	O
for	O
preventing	O
the	O
election	O
of	O
the	O
first	O
female	O
president	O
of	O
the	O
United	O
States	O
,	O
an	B-PROP
unpardonable	O
crime	O
by	O
a	B-PROP
misogynist	I-PROP
white	I-PROP
male	I-PROP
who	I-PROP
“	I-PROP
grabs	I-PROP
women	I-PROP
by	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
pussy	I-PROP
.	O
”	O

The	O
hatred	O
of	O
Trump	O
by	O
the	O
military	O
/	O
security	O
complex	O
and	O
by	O
the	O
white	B-PROP
male	I-PROP
hating	I-PROP
Identity	I-PROP
Politics	I-PROP
of	O
the	O
Democratic	O
Party	O
is	B-PROP
giving	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
world	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
spectacle	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
an	I-PROP
American	I-PROP
democratic	I-PROP
presidential	I-PROP
election	I-PROP
being	I-PROP
overthrown	I-PROP
by	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
conspiracy	I-PROP
between	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
military	I-PROP
/	I-PROP
security	I-PROP
complex	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
Democratic	I-PROP
Party	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
whores	I-PROP
who	I-PROP
constitute	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
American	I-PROP
print	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
TV	I-PROP
media	I-PROP
.	O

Death	O
of	O
a	O
Nation	O
:	O
Pla	O
...	O
Dinesh	O
D'Souza	O
Best	O
Price	O
:	O
$	O
14.99	O
Buy	O
New	O
$	O
16.99	O
(	O
as	O
of	O
03:35	O
EDT	O
-	O
Details	O
)	O

President	O
Trump	O
stands	O
up	O
for	O
himself	O
on	O
Twitter	O
—	O
I	O
am	O
surprised	O
that	O
Tritter	O
has	O
n’t	O
suspended	O
his	O
account	O
—	O
but	O
otherwise	O
seems	O
powerless	O
.	O

Whoever	O
advised	O
Trump	O
to	O
appoint	O
Rosenstein	O
,	O
a	B-PROP
person	I-PROP
committed	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
Trump	I-PROP
’s	I-PROP
destruction	I-PROP
,	O
as	O
deputy	O
attorney	O
general	O
,	O
which	O
is	O
the	O
ruling	O
position	O
in	O
view	O
of	O
the	B-PROP
weak	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
stupid	I-PROP
AG	I-PROP
Sessions	I-PROP
who	O
recused	O
himself	O
from	O
the	O
Russiagate	O
investigation	O
,	O
intended	B-PROP
Trump	I-PROP
’s	I-PROP
destruction	I-PROP
.	O

A	B-PROP
disreputable	I-PROP
person	I-PROP
committed	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
Trump	I-PROP
’s	I-PROP
destruction	I-PROP
is	O
appointed	O
by	O
Trump	O
to	O
destroy	B-PROP
Trump	I-PROP
.	O

How	O
can	O
a	O
person	O
so	O
unclued	O
survive	O
?	O

As	O
I	O
wrote	O
during	O
the	O
presidential	O
campaign	O
,	O
Trump	O
has	O
no	O
idea	O
of	O
Washington	O
and	O
no	O
idea	O
who	O
to	O
appoint	O
who	O
would	O
support	O
him	O
rather	O
than	O
work	O
against	O
him	O
.	O

Consequently	O
,	O
he	O
has	O
a	O
government	O
working	O
against	O
him	O
.	O

Senators	O
John	O
McCain	O
and	O
Lindsey	O
Graham	O
are	O
working	O
to	O
prevent	O
the	O
Republican	O
Party	O
from	O
supporting	O
the	O
party	O
’s	O
president	O
.	O

They	O
could	O
easily	O
succeed	O
.	O

The	O
entirety	O
of	O
the	O
House	O
and	O
Senate	O
of	O
both	O
parties	O
is	O
in	O
thrall	O
to	O
the	O
campaign	O
donations	O
of	O
the	O
military	O
/	O
security	O
complex	O
.	O

What	O
can	O
President	O
Trump	O
do	O
?	O

He	O
could	O
fight	O
,	O
not	O
with	O
words	O
on	O
Twitter	O
,	O
but	O
with	O
the	O
powers	O
of	O
the	O
presidency	O
.	O

There	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
far	I-PROP
more	I-PROP
evidence	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
Russiagate	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
conspiracy	I-PROP
against	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
President	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
United	I-PROP
States	I-PROP
than	I-PROP
there	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
evidence	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
Trump	I-PROP
-	I-PROP
Putin	I-PROP
conspiracy	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
steal	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
election	I-PROP
from	I-PROP
Hillary	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

If	B-PROP
Mueller	I-PROP
can	I-PROP
indict	I-PROP
on	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
basis	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
no	I-PROP
evidence	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
Trump	I-PROP
can	I-PROP
order	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
Attorney	I-PROP
General	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
indict	I-PROP
on	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
basis	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
massive	I-PROP
evidence	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
Russiagate	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
conspiracy	I-PROP
against	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
President	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
United	I-PROP
States	I-PROP
.	O

Brennan	O
,	O
Comey	O
,	O
Clapper	O
,	O
Mueller	O
,	O
Rosenstein	O
,	O
McCabe	O
,	O
Strzok	O
,	O
CNN	O
,	O
MSNBC	O
,	O
Fox	O
News	O
,	O
NPR	O
,	O
the	O
New	O
York	O
Times	O
,	O
Washington	O
Post	O
,	O
et	O
.	O

al	O
.	O
,	O
are	O
all	O
members	O
of	O
the	O
conspiracy	O
to	O
overthrow	B-PROP
democracy	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
America	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
establish	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
undisputed	I-PROP
rule	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
military	I-PROP
/	I-PROP
security	I-PROP
complex	I-PROP
.	O

The	O
idiot	B-PROP
presstitutes	I-PROP
’	O
hatred	O
of	O
Trump	O
might	O
leave	O
them	O
unaware	O
of	O
the	O
conspiracy	O
in	O
which	O
they	O
are	O
participating	O
,	O
but	O
there	O
is	O
no	O
doubt	O
that	O
the	O
American	B-PROP
presstitutes	I-PROP
are	O
engaged	O
in	O
the	O
overthrow	O
of	O
American	O
democracy	O
,	O
however	B-PROP
little	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
American	I-PROP
democracy	I-PROP
still	I-PROP
exists	I-PROP
.	O

This	O
column	O
is	O
not	O
an	O
endorsement	O
of	O
Trump	O
.	O

It	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
an	I-PROP
endorsement	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
truth	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
an	I-PROP
endorsement	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
American	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
who	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
their	I-PROP
distress	I-PROP
and	O
with	O
the	O
best	O
information	O
that	O
they	O
could	O
acquire	B-PROP
elected	I-PROP
Donald	I-PROP
Trump	I-PROP
their	I-PROP
President	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

Trump	O
is	O
wrong	O
on	O
the	O
environment	O
.	O

Environmental	O
protections	O
put	O
in	O
place	O
after	O
years	O
of	O
struggle	O
are	O
being	O
eviscerated	B-PROP
by	O
industry	O
polluters	O
who	O
have	O
gained	O
controll	O
over	O
the	O
environmental	O
regulatory	O
agencies	O
.	O

This	O
is	O
not	O
a	O
unique	O
happening	O
of	O
the	O
Trump	O
presidency	O
.	O

It	O
began	O
under	O
VP	O
Dick	O
Cheney	O
,	O
the	O
real	O
president	O
during	O
the	O
8	O
years	O
of	O
the	O
George	O
W.	O
Bush	O
regime	O
.	O

Cheney	O
turned	O
the	O
environmental	O
protection	O
regulatory	O
agencies	O
over	O
to	O
industry	O
polluters	O
.	O

Trump	O
is	O
wrong	O
on	O
Iran	O
.	O

He	O
is	O
in	O
Israel	O
’s	O
hands	O
,	O
hoping	O
that	O
the	O
power	O
of	O
the	O
Israel	O
Lobby	O
can	O
shield	O
him	O
from	O
the	O
presstitutes	O
and	O
the	O
military	O
/	O
security	O
complex	O
.	O

What	O
Israel	O
is	O
doing	O
by	O
attempting	O
to	O
use	O
US	O
military	O
force	O
against	O
Iran	O
is	O
unifying	O
a	O
new	O
alliance	O
that	O
is	O
too	O
powerful	O
for	O
the	O
Washington	O
/	O
Israeli	O
alliance	O
.	O

Russia	O
,	O
China	O
,	O
Syria	O
,	O
Turkey	O
,	O
Iran	O
,	O
India	O
,	O
and	O
Pakistan	O
are	O
the	O
locations	O
of	O
populations	O
that	O
massively	O
outnumber	O
Washington	O
’s	O
empire	O
.	O

Each	O
of	O
these	O
countries	O
are	O
being	O
united	O
by	O
Washington	O
’s	O
stupid	B-PROP
and	I-PROP
inexplicable	I-PROP
actions	O
against	O
each	O
.	O

Militarily	O
,	O
Israel	O
is	O
of	O
no	O
consequence	O
.	O

Twice	O
the	O
vaunted	O
Israeli	O
Army	O
,	O
capable	B-PROP
of	I-PROP
nothing	I-PROP
but	I-PROP
murdering	I-PROP
unarmed	I-PROP
women	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
children	I-PROP
,	O
were	O
defeated	O
and	O
driven	O
out	O
of	O
southern	O
Lebanon	O
by	O
a	O
few	O
thousand	O
Hezbollah	O
militia	O
.	O

Israel	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
too	I-PROP
cowardly	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
try	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
third	I-PROP
time	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
relying	I-PROP
on	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
stupid	I-PROP
Americans	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
do	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
job	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
them	I-PROP
.	O

The	O
entire	O
world	O
looks	O
at	O
America	O
and	O
Israel	O
,	O
and	O
what	O
does	O
the	O
world	O
see	O
?	O

Two	O
countries	O
,	O
both	O
the	O
result	O
of	O
exterminating	B-PROP
the	O
native	O
populations	O
,	O
distrusted	B-PROP
and	O
universally	B-PROP
hated	I-PROP
,	O
both	O
of	O
which	O
survive	O
by	O
purhasing	O
the	O
governments	O
of	O
other	O
countries	O
and	O
by	O
endless	B-PROP
lies	O
that	O
describe	O
everyone	O
but	O
themselves	O
and	O
their	O
vassals	O
as	O
evil	B-PROP
criminals	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
must	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
destroyed	I-PROP
.	O

For	O
example	O
,	O
the	O
Gaza	O
Strip	O
,	O
the	O
largest	O
concentration	O
camp	O
ever	O
in	O
the	O
world	O
,	O
is	O
being	O
systematically	O
destroyed	O
along	O
with	O
all	O
life	O
within	O
it	O
by	O
Israel	O
under	O
cover	O
of	O
the	O
obvious	O
and	O
transparanent	O
lie	O
that	O
all	O
within	O
Gaza	O
are	O
terrorists	B-PROP
outfitted	O
with	O
bomb	O
belts	O
who	O
are	O
committed	O
to	O
the	O
destruction	O
of	O
Israel	O
.	O

Not	O
only	O
men	O
of	O
fighting	O
age	O
,	O
but	O
also	O
old	O
men	O
,	O
pregnant	O
women	O
,	O
children	O
,	O
all	O
Palestinians	O
are	O
being	O
murdered	O
by	O
the	O
Israeli	O
military	O
.	O

The	O
United	O
States	O
Secretary	O
of	O
State	O
agrees	O
with	O
Israel	O
that	O
all	B-PROP
Palestinians	I-PROP
must	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
destroyed	I-PROP
,	O
the	O
sooner	O
the	O
better	O
.	O

The	O
Chinese	O
are	O
busy	O
taking	O
advantage	O
of	O
the	O
financial	O
opportunities	O
that	O
the	O
idiot	B-PROP
Americans	I-PROP
forfeit	O
,	O
but	O
otherwise	O
do	O
not	O
seem	O
to	O
have	O
any	O
strategic	O
sense	O
of	O
how	O
to	O
proceed	O
in	O
the	O
drama	O
unfolding	O
in	O
front	O
of	O
their	O
eyes	O
.	O

For	B-PROP
China	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
money	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
now	I-PROP
all	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

The	O
Russians	O
are	O
infected	B-PROP
with	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
American	I-PROP
propaganda	I-PROP
infused	I-PROP
into	I-PROP
their	I-PROP
veins	I-PROP
during	O
the	O
Yeltsin	O
era	O
when	O
Russia	O
was	O
an	B-PROP
American	I-PROP
puppet	I-PROP
state	I-PROP
.	O

Slowly	O
,	O
if	O
not	O
surely	O
,	O
the	O
Russians	B-PROP
are	O
coming	O
to	O
their	O
senses	O
and	O
realizing	O
that	O
they	O
have	O
no	B-PROP
American	I-PROP
“	I-PROP
partner	I-PROP
.	O
”	O

If	O
Trump	O
is	O
defeated	O
and	O
moved	O
off	O
the	O
table	O
,	O
what	O
happens	O
when	O
Russia	O
and	O
China	O
finally	O
realize	O
that	O
there	O
is	O
to	O
be	O
no	O
conciliation	O
with	O
Washington	O
?	O

When	O
all	O
the	O
false	O
hopes	O
and	O
bets	O
of	O
the	O
Russian	O
and	O
Chinese	O
governments	O
of	O
conciliation	O
on	O
the	O
basis	O
of	O
mutual	O
economic	O
interests	O
come	O
to	O
naught	O
,	O
what	O
happens	O
?	O

It	B-PROP
will	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
end	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
life	I-PROP
on	I-PROP
earth	I-PROP
.	O

The	B-PROP
Russiagate	I-PROP
“	I-PROP
investigation	I-PROP
”	I-PROP
appears	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
timed	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
influence	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
midterm	I-PROP
elections	I-PROP
with	I-PROP
unsubstantiated	I-PROP
accusations	I-PROP
made	I-PROP
just	I-PROP
before	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
elections	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
an	I-PROP
attempt	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
produce	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
Democratic	I-PROP
Congress	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
would	I-PROP
impeach	I-PROP
President	I-PROP
Trump	I-PROP
on	I-PROP
false	I-PROP
charges	I-PROP
.	O

The	O
presstitutes	B-PROP
would	O
cover	O
up	O
the	O
frameup	O
.	O

In	O
other	O
words	O
,	O
the	O
real	O
election	O
meddling	O
is	O
being	O
done	O
by	O
the	O
Russiagate	O
“	O
investigation	O
.	O
”	O
See	O
here	O
and	O
here	O
.	O

Such	O
an	O
impeachment	O
would	O
be	O
a	O
coup	O
.	O

The	B-PROP
consequence	I-PROP
would	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
deep	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
permanent	I-PROP
divisions	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
American	I-PROP
political	I-PROP
life	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
more	I-PROP
rabid	I-PROP
Russiaphobia	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
would	I-PROP
result	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
war	I-PROP
.	O

The	B-PROP
danger	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
real	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
Democrats	I-PROP
’	I-PROP
Russiagate	I-PROP
“	I-PROP
investigation	I-PROP
”	I-PROP
aided	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
abetted	I-PROP
by	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
presstitute	I-PROP
media	I-PROP
will	I-PROP
result	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
nuclear	I-PROP
Armageddon	I-PROP
.	O

The	O
Best	O
of	O
Paul	O
Craig	O
Roberts	O

Horrifying	B-PROP
Details	O
Released	O
:	O
2	O
Jihadi	B-PROP
Muslims	I-PROP
At	O
Deadly	O
NM	O
Islamic	O
Compound	O
Hit	O
With	O
New	O
Charges	O

Siraj	O
Ibn	O
Wahhaj	O
and	O
one	O
of	O
his	O
devout	O
wives	O
were	O
charged	O
with	O
abuse	O
of	O
a	O
child	O
resulting	O
in	O
the	O
death	O
of	O
a	O
child	O
and	O
conspiracy	O
to	O
commit	O
abuse	O
of	O
a	O
child	O
.	O

Law	O
enforcement	O
rushed	O
to	O
destroy	O
the	O
Islamic	O
compound	O
just	O
days	O
after	O
the	O
kidnapping	O
and	O
murder	O
made	O
national	O
news	O
.	O

They	O
destroyed	O
evidence	O
,	O
despite	O
the	O
fact	O
that	O
the	O
investigation	O
was	O
new	O
and	O
ongoing	O
.	O

New	O
charges	O
were	O
filed	O
against	O
the	B-PROP
devout	I-PROP
(	I-PROP
“	I-PROP
extremist	I-PROP
)	I-PROP
”	I-PROP
Muslims	I-PROP
.	O

For	O
years	O
,	O
the	O
FBI	O
and	O
local	O
law	O
enforcement	O
did	O
nothing	O
about	O
this	O
jihad	B-PROP
compound	I-PROP
,	O
despite	O
tips	O
and	O
numerous	O
calls	O
from	O
concerned	O
citizens	O
.	O

It	O
took	O
the	O
murder	O
of	O
a	O
child	O
to	O
get	O
them	O
to	O
pay	O
attention	O
.	O

What	O
is	O
the	O
first	O
thing	O
they	O
do	O
after	O
it	O
is	O
discovered	O
a	O
child	O
was	O
murdered	O
on	O
the	O
compound	O
and	O
several	O
starved	B-PROP
to	I-PROP
almost	I-PROP
certain	I-PROP
death	I-PROP
?	O

They	O
destroyed	O
the	O
compound	O
to	O
cover	O
up	O
both	O
their	O
negligence	B-PROP
and	O
what	O
happened	O
there	O
.	O

News	B-PROP
of	I-PROP
what	I-PROP
happened	I-PROP
there	I-PROP
was	I-PROP
embarrassing	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
Muslim	I-PROP
community	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
U.S.	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
making	I-PROP
Islam	I-PROP
look	I-PROP
good	I-PROP
seems	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
top	I-PROP
priority	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
law	I-PROP
enforcement	I-PROP
officials	I-PROP
.	O

It	O
’s	O
sharia	O
compliance	O
in	O
New	O
Mexico	O
.	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O

Will	O
Brett	O
Kavanaugh	O
be	O
confirmed	O
to	O
the	O
Supreme	O
Court	O
?	O

Will	O
Brett	O
Kavanaugh	O
be	O
confirmed	O
to	O
the	O
Supreme	O
Court	O
?	O

Will	O
Brett	O
Kavanaugh	O
be	O
confirmed	O
to	O
the	O
Supreme	O
Court	O
?	O

*	O
Yes	O
,	O
he	O
will	O
be	O
confirmed	O
.	O

No	O
,	O
he	O
will	O
not	O
be	O
confirmed	O
.	O

Email	O
*	O

Phone	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Freedom	O
Outpost	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

Article	O
posted	O
with	O
permission	O
from	O
Pamela	O
Geller	O

Federal	O
judge	O
rules	O
against	O
Trump	O
administration	O
on	O
3-D	O
gun	O
blueprint	O
case	O

(	O
This	O
article	O
by	O
McClatchy	O
-	O
Tribune	O
contains	O
fake	O
news	O
,	O
which	O
we	O
refute	O
at	O
the	O
end	O
.	O

–	O
BL	O
)	O

A	O
federal	O
judge	O
on	O
Monday	O
issued	O
a	O
preliminary	O
injunction	O
continuing	O
a	O
prohibition	O
on	O
the	O
Trump	O
administration	O
proposal	O
to	O
make	O
available	O
blueprints	O
for	O
so	O
-	O
called	O
ghost	B-PROP
guns	I-PROP
,	O
untraceable	O
weapons	O
that	O
can	O
be	O
manufactured	O
on	O
a	O
3D	O
printer	O
,	O
California	O
Attorney	O
General	O
Xavier	O
Becerra	O
said	O
.	O

California	O
was	O
one	O
of	O
20	O
states	O
led	O
by	O
Washington	O
that	O
won	O
the	O
decision	O
from	O
U.S.	O
District	O
Judge	O
Robert	O
S.	O
Lasnik	O
in	O
Seattle	O
.	O

The	O
injunction	O
extends	O
a	O
ruling	O
last	O
month	O
that	O
barred	O
the	O
Trump	O
administration	O
from	O
taking	O
steps	O
that	O
would	O
allow	O
the	O
firm	O
Defense	O
Distributed	O
to	O
disseminate	O
3D	O
gun	O
blueprints	O
.	O

“	O
When	O
the	O
Trump	O
Administration	O
inexplicably	B-PROP
gave	I-PROP
the	O
green	O
light	O
to	O
distribute	O
on	O
the	O
internet	O
blueprints	O
of	O
3D	O
-	O
printed	O
,	O
untraceable	O
ghost	B-PROP
guns	I-PROP
,	O
it	B-PROP
needlessly	I-PROP
endangered	I-PROP
our	B-PROP
children	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
our	I-PROP
loved	I-PROP
ones	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
our	I-PROP
men	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
women	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
law	I-PROP
enforcement	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
”	I-PROP
Becerra	O
said	O
in	O
a	O
statement	O
.	O

“	O
The	B-PROP
Trump	I-PROP
Administration	I-PROP
’s	I-PROP
actions	I-PROP
were	I-PROP
dangerous	B-PROP
and	I-PROP
incompetent	I-PROP
.	O
”	O

The	O
action	O
Monday	O
keeps	O
in	O
place	O
a	O
July	O
31	O
court	O
decision	O
blocking	O
the	O
Trump	O
administration	O
pending	O
a	O
decision	O
on	O
the	O
merits	O
of	O
a	O
lawsuit	O
by	O
states	O
opposed	O
to	O
the	O
blueprints	O
being	O
published	O
.	O

“	O
The	O
Court	O
finds	O
that	O
the	O
irreparable	O
burdens	O
on	O
the	O
private	O
defendants	O
’	O
First	O
Amendment	O
rights	O
are	O
dwarfed	O
by	O
the	O
irreparable	O
harms	O
the	O
States	O
are	O
likely	O
to	O
suffer	O
if	O
the	O
existing	O
restrictions	O
are	O
withdrawn	O
and	O
that	O
,	O
overall	O
,	O
the	O
public	O
interest	O
strongly	O
supports	O
maintaining	O
the	O
status	O
quo	O
through	O
the	O
pendency	O
of	O
this	O
litigation	O
,	O
”	O
Lasnik	O
wrote	O
in	O
his	O
decision	O
.	O

—	O
Patrick	O
McGreevy	O

Los	O
Angeles	O
Times	O

—	O
—	O
—	O

©	O
2018	O
Los	O
Angeles	O
Times	O
,	O
Distributed	O
by	O
Tribune	O
Content	O
Agency	O
,	O
LLC	O
.	O

The	O
radical	B-PROP
leftist	I-PROP
gun	I-PROP
grabbing	I-PROP
anti	I-PROP
-	I-PROP
liberty	I-PROP
California	I-PROP
General	I-PROP
Xavier	O
Becerra	O
is	O
lying	O
when	O
he	O
says	O
the	O
“	O
Trump	O
Administration	O
inexplicably	B-PROP
gave	I-PROP
the	O
green	O
light	O
to	O
distribute	O
on	O
the	O
internet	O
blueprints	O
of	O
3D	O
-	O
printed	O
,	O
untraceable	O
ghost	O
guns	O
.	O
”	O
The	O
Department	O
of	O
Just(Us	O
)	O
settled	O
a	O
1st	O
Amendment	O
claim	O
filed	O
by	O
Cody	O
Wilson	O
,	O
who	O
created	O
the	O
code	O
for	O
3-D	O
guns	O
.	O

It	O
was	O
a	O
case	O
the	O
government	O
was	O
about	O
to	O
lose	O
.	O

The	O
settlement	O
was	O
approved	O
by	O
a	O
federal	O
judge	O
.	O

Becerra	O
’s	O
statement	O
,	O
“	O
it	O
needlessly	O
endangered	O
our	O
children	O
,	O
our	O
loved	O
ones	O
and	O
our	O
men	O
and	O
women	O
in	O
law	O
enforcement	O
,	O
”	O
is	O
preposterous	B-PROP
left	I-PROP
-	I-PROP
wing	I-PROP
political	I-PROP
argle	I-PROP
-	I-PROP
bargle	I-PROP
.	O

I	O
suspect	O
the	O
Washington	O
judge	O
’s	O
stay	O
will	O
be	O
overturned	O
on	O
appeal	O
,	O
but	O
certainly	O
will	O
if	O
it	O
makes	O
it	O
to	O
the	O
Supreme	O
Court	O
.	O

The	O
federal	O
government	O
has	O
no	O
standing	O
to	O
restrict	O
speech	O
in	O
this	O
manner	O
.	O

–	O
BL	O

FBI	O
Arrests	O
5	O
Muslims	O
From	O
New	O
Mexico	O
Jihad	O
Compound	O
Days	O
After	O
Multiple	O
Charges	O
Were	O
Dropped	O

Just	O
days	O
after	O
a	O
district	O
judge	O
dropped	O
all	O
charges	O
against	O
three	O
of	O
the	O
Muslim	B-PROP
jihadis	I-PROP
at	O
the	O
New	O
Mexico	O
terror	O
compound	O
where	O
a	O
child	O
was	O
killed	O
and	O
11	O
other	O
children	O
were	O
being	O
trained	O
to	O
commit	O
jihad	O
in	O
mass	O
school	O
shootings	O
,	O
the	O
Federal	O
Bureau	O
of	O
Investigation	O
has	O
stepped	O
up	O
to	O
arrest	O
five	O
Islamists	O
,	O
but	O
the	O
charges	O
are	O
no	O
longer	O
the	O
same	O
.	O

Remember	O
,	O
this	O
all	O
occurred	O
because	O
the	O
district	O
attorney	O
failed	O
to	O
file	O
for	O
a	O
preliminary	O
hearing	O
within	O
10	O
days	O
and	O
did	O
n’t	O
even	O
bother	O
to	O
show	O
up	O
for	O
court	O
.	O

CBN	O
reports	O
:	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O
Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

*	O
John	O
Bolton	O
Richard	O
Grenell	O
Dina	O
Powell	O
Heather	O
Nauert	O
Ivanka	O
Trump	O

Email	O
*	O

Name	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Freedom	O
Outpost	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

SANTA	O
FE	O
,	O
N.M.	O
(	O
AP	O
)	O
-	O
Federal	O
prosecutors	O
say	O
the	O
FBI	O
has	O
arrested	O
five	O
former	O
residents	O
of	O
a	O
ramshackle	B-PROP
compound	I-PROP
in	O
New	O
Mexico	O
on	O
firearms	O
and	O
conspiracy	O
charges	O
as	O
local	O
prosecutors	O
dropped	O
charges	O
in	O
the	O
death	O
of	O
a	O
3-year	O
-	O
old	O
boy	O
at	O
the	O
property	O
.	O

Taos	O
County	O
District	O
Attorney	O
Donald	O
Gallegos	O
said	O
Friday	O
his	O
office	O
will	O
now	O
seek	O
grand	O
jury	O
indictments	O
involving	O
the	O
death	O
.	O

Gallegos	O
said	O
seeking	O
indictments	O
will	O
allow	O
more	O
time	O
to	O
gather	O
evidence	O
.	O

All	O
five	O
people	O
will	O
remain	O
in	O
custody	O
pending	O
a	O
Tuesday	O
hearing	O
in	O
federal	O
court	O
.	O

The	O
U.S.	O
Attorney	O
's	O
Office	O
in	O
Albuquerque	O
said	O
compound	O
resident	O
Jany	O
Leveille	O
has	O
been	O
charged	O
with	O
being	O
an	O
alien	O
unlawfully	O
in	O
possession	O
of	O
firearms	O
and	O
ammunition	O
.	O

She	O
is	O
a	O
Haitian	O
national	O
.	O

The	O
other	O
four	O
members	O
are	O
charged	O
with	O
conspiring	O
with	O
Leveille	O
.	O

And	O
the	O
death	O
of	O
the	O
three	O
-	O
year	O
-	O
old	O
?	O

Nothing	B-PROP
!	O

And	O
what	O
of	O
the	O
training	O
of	O
little	B-PROP
jihadis	I-PROP
?	O

Nothing	B-PROP
!	O

“	O
The	O
defendants	O
,	O
Jany	O
Leveille	O
,	O
35	O
,	O
a	O
Haitian	O
national	O
illegally	O
present	O
in	O
the	O
United	O
States	O
,	O
Siraj	O
Ibn	O
Wahhaj	O
,	O
40	O
,	O
Hujrah	O
Wahhaj	O
,	O
37	O
,	O
Subhanah	O
Wahhaj	O
,	O
35	O
,	O
and	O
Lucas	O
Morton	O
,	O
40	O
,	O
are	O
charged	O
in	O
a	O
criminal	O
complaint	O
that	O
was	O
filed	O
earlier	O
today	O
in	O
the	O
U.S.	O
District	O
Court	O
for	O
the	O
District	O
of	O
New	O
Mexico	O
,	O
”	O
the	O
bureau	O
said	O
in	O
a	O
statement	O
.	O

“	O
The	O
criminal	O
complaint	O
charges	O
Jany	O
Leveille	O
with	O
being	O
an	O
alien	O
unlawfully	O
in	O
possession	O
of	O
firearms	O
and	O
ammunition	O
in	O
the	O
District	O
of	O
New	O
Mexico	O
from	O
Nov.	O
2017	O
through	O
Aug.	O
2018	O
,	O
”	O
the	O
bureau	O
said	O
.	O

“	O
The	O
criminal	O
complaint	O
charges	O
the	O
other	O
four	O
defendants	O
with	O
aiding	O
and	O
abetting	O
Leveille	O
in	O
committing	O
the	O
offense	O
,	O
and	O
with	O
conspiring	O
with	O
Leveille	O
to	O
commit	O
the	O
offense	O
.	O
”	O

Yet	O
,	O
in	O
the	O
midst	O
of	O
all	O
of	O
this	O
,	O
do	O
n't	O
forget	O
that	O
the	O
FBI	O
ignore	O
the	O
intelligence	O
that	O
was	O
provided	O
to	O
them	O
,	O
just	O
like	O
they	O
have	O
in	O
many	O
cases	O
,	O
which	O
,	O
if	O
they	O
had	O
acted	O
,	O
they	O
may	O
have	O
saved	O
the	O
little	O
boy	O
's	O
life	O
.	O

In	O
the	O
meantime	O
,	O
the	O
New	O
Mexico	O
district	O
attorney	O
who	O
failed	O
to	O
file	O
for	O
a	O
preliminary	O
hearing	O
within	O
10	O
days	O
and	O
did	O
n’t	O
show	O
up	O
for	O
court	O
is	O
vowing	O
to	O
pursue	O
prosecution	O
of	O
these	O
jihadis	B-PROP
.	O

“	O
The	O
actions	O
yesterday	O
by	O
the	O
district	O
judges	O
do	O
not	O
affect	O
our	O
continuing	O
efforts	O
to	O
prosecute	O
the	O
individuals	O
as	O
charged	O
originally	O
,	O
”	O
Eighth	O
Judicial	O
District	O
Attorney	O
Donald	O
Gallegos	O
said	O
in	O
a	O
statement	O
on	O
Thursday	O
.	O

“	O
While	O
we	O
disagree	O
with	O
the	O
judges	O
,	O
they	O
did	O
their	O
jobs	O
.	O

We	O
will	O
continue	O
to	O
do	O
ours	O
.	O

“	O
Going	O
forward	O
,	O
our	O
options	O
are	O
to	O
refile	O
the	O
charges	O
or	O
take	O
the	O
cases	O
to	O
the	O
grand	O
jury	O
.	O

We	O
are	O
assessing	O
and	O
will	O
decide	O
which	O
avenue	O
to	O
pursue	O
.	O

What	O
is	O
important	O
to	O
know	O
is	O
that	O
we	O
will	O
continue	O
to	O
pursue	O
prosecution	O
of	O
the	O
cases	O
.	O
”	O

StatementThe	O
actions	O
yesterday	O
by	O
the	O
district	O
judges	O
do	O
not	O
affect	O
our	O
continuing	O
efforts	O
to	O
prosecute	O
the	O
...	O
Posted	O
by	O
Eighth	O
Judicial	O
District	O
Attorney	O
on	O
Thursday	O
,	O
August	O
30	O
,	O
2018	O

He	O
also	O
sought	O
to	O
fight	O
back	O
against	O
criticism	O
in	O
his	O
failure	O
to	O
perform	O
his	O
job	O
.	O

“	O
Finally	O
,	O
I	O
have	O
always	O
welcomed	O
criticism	O
and	O
,	O
as	O
public	O
servants	O
,	O
our	O
judges	O
should	O
also	O
,	O
”	O
Gallegos	O
said	O
in	O
the	O
statement	O
.	O

“	O
However	O
,	O
I	O
ask	O
that	O
you	O
be	O
civil	O
and	O
respectful	O
in	O
your	O
criticisms	O
as	O
that	O
is	O
more	O
constructive	O
.	O

Cussing	B-PROP
and	I-PROP
threatening	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
involved	I-PROP
will	I-PROP
not	I-PROP
accomplish	I-PROP
justice	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
serves	I-PROP
no	I-PROP
useful	I-PROP
purpose	I-PROP
.	O

Remember	O
,	O
you	O
do	O
not	O
have	O
all	O
the	O
facts	O
.	O

That	O
will	O
develop	O
as	O
the	O
cases	O
progress	O
.	O
"	O

Yeah	B-PROP
,	I-PROP
well	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
's	I-PROP
about	I-PROP
as	I-PROP
trustworthy	I-PROP
as	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
FBI	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
this	I-PROP
matter	I-PROP
.	O

This	O
latest	O
move	O
,	O
while	O
welcome	O
,	O
may	O
only	O
be	O
a	O
response	O
to	O
President	O
Donald	O
Trump	O
's	O
vow	O
to	O
"	O
get	O
involved	O
.	O
"	O

However	O
,	O
I	O
ask	O
,	O
why	O
were	O
you	O
not	O
involved	O
in	O
the	O
first	O
place	O
,	O
Mr.	O
President	O
?	O

According	O
to	O
the	O
Constitution	O
,	O
you	O
,	O
and	O
you	O
alone	O
,	O
are	O
the	O
sole	O
head	O
of	O
the	O
executive	O
branch	O
,	O
and	O
as	O
such	O
you	O
are	O
where	O
the	O
buck	O
stop	O
in	O
making	O
sure	O
the	O
laws	O
are	O
faithfully	O
executed	O
.	O

So	B-PROP
,	I-PROP
if	I-PROP
Trump	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
going	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
fire	I-PROP
Sessions	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
perhaps	I-PROP
he	I-PROP
should	I-PROP
stop	I-PROP
talking	I-PROP
about	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
get	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
actually	I-PROP
put	I-PROP
someone	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
Justice	I-PROP
Department	I-PROP
as	I-PROP
attorney	I-PROP
general	I-PROP
who	I-PROP
will	I-PROP
do	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
job	I-PROP
faithfully	I-PROP
,	O
and	O
by	O
that	O
,	O
I	O
do	O
n't	O
mean	O
Trey	O
Gowdy	O
.	O

I	O
mean	O
someone	O
who	O
is	O
serious	O
about	O
justice	O
,	O
not	O
political	O
grandstanding	O
or	O
covering	O
up	O
criminal	O
activity	O
.	O

Until	O
then	O
,	O
I	O
'll	O
consider	O
this	O
the	O
means	O
the	O
FBI	O
will	O
use	O
to	O
engage	O
in	O
the	O
further	O
coverup	O
of	O
what	O
really	O
took	O
place	O
at	O
that	O
compound	O
beyond	O
the	O
bulldozing	B-PROP
of	O
a	O
crime	O
scene	O
,	O
and	O
possibly	O
,	O
their	O
own	O
complicity	O
.	O

Article	O
posted	O
with	O
permission	O
from	O
Sons	O
Of	O
Liberty	O
Media	O

FBI	O
:	O
Muslim	O
Teen	O
From	O
NM	O
Islamic	O
Compound	O
Trained	O
For	O
Jihad	O
:	O
"	O
Raise	O
An	O
Army	O
"	O
"	O
Killing	O
Non	O
-	O
Believers	O
On	O
Behalf	O
Of	O
Allah	O
"	O

It	O
was	O
a	O
jihad	B-PROP
training	I-PROP
camp	I-PROP
.	O

Raising	B-PROP
an	I-PROP
army	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
jihad	I-PROP
slaughter	I-PROP
.	O

And	O
their	O
defense	O
is	O
“	O
freedom	O
of	O
religion	O
,	O
”	O
calling	O
this	O
prosecution	O
“	O
islamophobia	O
.	O
”	O

The	O
enemedia	O
is	O
scrubbing	O
and	O
censoring	O
this	O
story	O
–	O
but	O
it	O
is	O
just	O
as	O
we	O
have	O
warned	O
/	O
predicted	O
for	O
years	O
.	O

In	O
an	O
affidavit	O
filed	O
in	O
support	O
of	O
a	O
criminal	O
complaint	O
,	O
an	O
FBI	O
special	O
agent	O
wrote	O
that	O
Leveille	O
’s	O
13-year	O
-	O
old	O
son	O
told	O
investigators	O
that	O
his	O
mother	O
’s	O
boyfriend	O
,	O
Siraj	O
Ibn	O
Wahhaj	O
,	O
40	O
,	O
wanted	O
to	O
“	O
get	O
an	O
army	O
together	O
”	O
and	O
train	O
them	O
for	O
jihad	O
.	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O
Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

*	O
John	O
Bolton	O
Richard	O
Grenell	O
Dina	O
Powell	O
Heather	O
Nauert	O
Ivanka	O
Trump	O

Email	O
*	O

Name	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Freedom	O
Outpost	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

The	O
boy	O
told	O
agents	O
that	O
Ibn	O
Wahhaj	O
trained	O
him	O
and	O
another	O
of	O
Leveille	O
’s	O
teenage	O
sons	O
in	O
firearms	O
and	O
military	O
techniques	O
,	O
including	O
rapid	O
reloads	O
and	O
hand	O
-	O
to	O
-	O
hand	O
combat	O
,	O
and	O
told	O
them	O
jihad	O
meant	O
killing	O
non	O
-	O
believers	O
on	O
behalf	O
of	O
Allah	O
,	O
according	O
to	O
the	O
affidavit	O
filed	O
in	O
U.S.	O
District	O
Court	O
in	O
New	O
Mexico	O
.	O

[	O
…	O
]	O
Defense	O
lawyers	O
have	O
said	O
that	O
the	O
five	O
adults	O
were	O
exercising	O
their	O
constitutional	O
rights	O
to	O
practice	O
their	O
religion	O
and	O
own	O
firearms	O
,	O
and	O
that	O
the	O
group	O
is	O
being	O
discriminated	O
against	O
because	O
they	O
are	O
black	O
and	O
Muslim	O
.	O

The	O
defense	O
attorneys	O
could	O
not	O
immediately	O
be	O
reached	O
for	O
comment	O
on	O
Saturday	O
.	O

There	O
it	O
is	O
.	O

TEEN	O
FROM	O
NEW	O
MEXICO	O
COMPOUND	O
SAYS	O
HE	O
WAS	O
TRAINED	O
FOR	O
JIHAD	O
:	O
FBI	O
TAOS	O
,	O
N.M.	O
(	O
REUTERS	O
)	O
–	O
A	O
13-YEAR	O
-	O
OLD	O
BOY	O
WHO	O
WAS	O
PART	O
OF	O
GROUP	O
TAKEN	O
INTO	O
CUSTODY	O
AT	O
A	O
SQUALID	B-PROP
NEW	O
MEXICO	O
COMPOUND	O
LAST	O
MONTH	O
HAS	O
TOLD	O
FBI	O
AGENTS	O
HIS	O
MOTHER	O
’S	O
BOYFRIEND	O
WAS	O
TRAINING	O
HIM	O
TO	O
CONDUCT	O
“	O
JIHAD	B-PROP
”	I-PROP
AGAINST	O
NON	B-PROP
-	I-PROP
BELIEVERS	I-PROP
,	O
ACCORDING	O
TO	O
FEDERAL	O
COURT	O
DOCUMENTS	O
.	O

By	O
Andrew	O
Hay	O
,	O
Reuters	O
,	O
September	O
2	O
,	O
2018	O
:	O
The	O
boy	O
was	O
among	O
11	O
children	O
and	O
five	O
adults	O
living	O
at	O
the	O
compound	O
in	O
Taos	O
County	O
when	O
it	O
was	O
raided	O
on	O
Aug.	O
3	O
by	O
local	O
sheriff	O
’s	O
deputies	O
who	O
discovered	O
a	O
cache	O
of	O
firearms	O
and	O
the	O
children	O
living	O
without	O
food	O
or	O
clean	O
water	O
.	O

The	O
dead	O
body	O
of	O
a	O
three	O
-	O
year	O
-	O
old	O
boy	O
was	O
found	O
buried	O
at	O
the	O
site	O
later	O
They	O
initially	O
faced	O
state	O
charges	O
,	O
then	O
on	O
Friday	O
,	O
the	O
five	O
adults	O
including	O
a	O
Haitian	O
woman	O
described	O
as	O
the	O
group	O
’s	O
leader	O
,	O
35-year	O
-	O
old	O
Jany	O
Leveille	O
,	O
were	O
arrested	O
by	O
the	O
Federal	O
Bureau	O
of	O
Investigation	O
and	O
accused	O
of	O
conspiracy	O
and	O
firearms	O
offenses	O
.	O

In	O
an	O
affidavit	O
filed	O
in	O
support	O
of	O
a	O
criminal	O
complaint	O
,	O
an	O
FBI	O
special	O
agent	O
wrote	O
that	O
Leveille	O
’s	O
13-year	O
-	O
old	O
son	O
told	O
investigators	O
that	O
his	O
mother	O
’s	O
boyfriend	O
,	O
Siraj	O
Ibn	O
Wahhaj	O
,	O
40	O
,	O
wanted	O
to	O
“	O
get	O
an	O
army	O
together	O
”	O
and	O
train	O
them	O
for	O
jihad	O
.	O

The	O
boy	O
told	O
agents	O
that	O
Ibn	O
Wahhaj	O
trained	O
him	O
and	O
another	O
of	O
Leveille	O
’s	O
teenage	O
sons	O
in	O
firearms	O
and	O
military	O
techniques	O
,	O
including	O
rapid	O
reloads	O
and	O
hand	O
-	O
to	O
-	O
hand	O
combat	O
,	O
and	O
told	O
them	O
jihad	O
meant	O
killing	O
non	O
-	O
believers	O
on	O
behalf	O
of	O
Allah	O
,	O
according	O
to	O
the	O
affidavit	O
filed	O
in	O
U.S.	O
District	O
Court	O
in	O
New	O
Mexico	O
.	O

The	O
13-year	O
-	O
old	O
also	O
told	O
the	O
FBI	O
that	O
his	O
mother	O
believed	O
she	O
received	O
messages	O
from	O
God	O
,	O
and	O
that	O
he	O
watched	O
her	O
and	O
Ibn	O
Wahhaj	O
perform	O
supposed	O
“	O
exorcism	B-PROP
”	O
rituals	O
over	O
the	O
three	O
-	O
year	O
-	O
old	O
boy	O
,	O
including	O
one	O
during	O
which	O
the	O
boy	O
choked	O
and	O
his	O
heart	O
stopped	O
,	O
according	O
to	O
the	O
special	O
agent	O
’s	O
affidavit	O
.	O

The	O
teenager	O
said	O
his	O
mother	O
and	O
others	O
at	O
the	O
compound	O
told	O
him	O
not	O
to	O
talk	O
to	O
anyone	O
about	O
the	O
three	O
-	O
year	O
-	O
old	O
ever	O
being	O
at	O
the	O
compound	O
because	O
they	B-PROP
would	I-PROP
“	B-PROP
all	I-PROP
go	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
jail	I-PROP
.	I-PROP
”	I-PROP
Defense	O
lawyers	O
have	O
said	O
that	O
the	O
five	O
adults	O
were	O
exercising	O
their	O
constitutional	O
rights	O
to	O
practice	O
their	O
religion	O
and	O
own	O
firearms	O
,	O
and	O
that	O
the	O
group	O
is	O
being	O
discriminated	O
against	O
because	O
they	O
are	O
black	O
and	O
Muslim	O
.	O

The	O
defense	O
attorneys	O
could	O
not	O
immediately	O
be	O
reached	O
for	O
comment	O
on	O
Saturday	O
.	O

The	O
five	O
defendants	O
came	O
under	O
FBI	O
surveillance	O
in	O
May	O
after	O
Leveille	O
wrote	O
a	O
letter	O
to	O
Ibn	O
Wahhaj	O
’s	O
brother	O
asking	O
him	O
to	O
join	O
them	O
and	O
become	O
a	O
“	O
martyr	O
,	O
”	O
state	O
prosecutors	O
have	O
said	O
.	O

They	O
are	O
due	O
to	O
appear	O
in	O
court	O
in	O
Albuquerque	O
on	O
Tuesday	O
.	O

Article	O
posted	O
with	O
permission	O
from	O
Pamela	O
Geller	O

Pit	O
Bull	O
Journalist	O
Hounds	O
Keith	O
Ellison	O
Over	O
Abuse	O
Of	O
Women	O
-	O
Watch	O
Him	O
Flee	O
!	O

Investigative	O
journalist	O
Laura	O
Loomer	O
tracked	O
down	O
Rep.	O
Keith	O
Ellison	O
(	O
D	O
-	O
MN	O
)	O
,	O
aka	O
Hakim	O
Muhammad	O
,	O
at	O
an	O
event	O
he	O
was	O
at	O
on	O
Saturday	O
and	O
questioned	O
him	O
about	O
the	O
police	O
reports	O
filed	O
against	O
him	O
by	O
women	O
who	O
claimed	O
he	O
abused	O
them	O
.	O

With	O
documents	O
in	O
hand	O
,	O
Loomer	O
hounded	O
Ellison	O
,	O
asking	O
him	O
if	O
he	O
would	O
respond	O
to	O
the	O
reports	O
,	O
but	O
the	O
Democrat	O
candidate	O
for	O
attorney	O
general	O
of	O
Minnesota	O
,	O
despite	O
the	O
fact	O
he	O
does	O
n't	O
have	O
an	O
active	O
license	O
to	O
practice	O
law	O
,	O
would	O
not	O
answer	O
,	O
but	O
tried	O
to	O
flee	O
like	B-PROP
a	I-PROP
frightened	I-PROP
puppy	I-PROP
.	O

I	O
'm	O
posting	O
the	O
video	O
from	O
Facebook	O
and	O
Youtube	O
.	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

*	O
John	O
Bolton	O
Richard	O
Grenell	O
Dina	O
Powell	O
Heather	O
Nauert	O
Ivanka	O
Trump	O

Email	O
*	O

Comments	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Freedom	O
Outpost	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

Keith	O
Ellison	O
CONFRONTED	O
About	O
Domestic	O
Violence	O
Allegations	O
Produced	O
by	O
Sean	O
CampbellAs	O
he	O
arrived	O
for	O
a	O
campaign	O
event	O
in	O
Minnesota	O
on	O
Saturday	O
,	O
Rep.	O
Keith	O
Ellison	O
(	O
D	O
-	O
MN	O
)	O
was	O
confronted	O
by	O
investigative	O
journalist	O
Laura	O
Loomer	O
about	O
the	O
numerous	O
domestic	O
violence	O
allegations	O
that	O
have	O
been	O
brought	O
against	O
him	O
by	O
two	O
different	O
women	O
.	O
Loomer	O
questioned	O
Ellison	O
about	O
a	O
2005	O
police	O
report	O
filed	O
by	O
Amy	O
Alexander	O
,	O
a	O
Democrat	B-PROP
activist	I-PROP
who	O
he	O
had	O
a	O
relationship	O
with	O
.	O

With	O
the	O
police	O
report	O
in	O
hand	O
,	O
Loomer	O
asked	O
Ellison	O
to	O
explain	O
why	O
the	O
police	O
report	O
says	O
there	O
was	O
a	O
domestic	O
violence	O
call	O
to	O
Alexander	O
's	O
house	O
,	O
despite	O
the	O
fact	O
that	O
Ellison	O
has	O
denied	O
the	O
allegations	O
.	O
Please	O
Support	O
my	O
Independent	O
Journalism	O
:	O
http://bit.ly/loomeredTHANK	O
YOU	O
IN	O
ADVANCE	O
FOR	O
YOUR	O
CONTRIBUTION	O
!	O

Posted	O
by	O
Laura	O
Loomer	O
on	O
Monday	O
,	O
September	O
3	O
,	O
2018	O

His	O
supporters	O
continuously	O
tried	O
to	O
block	O
Loomer	O
,	O
even	O
trying	O
to	O
put	O
their	O
hands	O
on	O
her	O
,	O
cover	O
up	O
her	O
camera	O
and	O
getting	O
in	O
her	O
way	O
of	O
asking	O
honest	O
answers	O
that	O
Ellison	O
owes	O
the	O
people	O
whom	O
he	O
is	O
asking	O
to	O
vote	O
for	O
him	O
.	O

Loomer	O
asked	O
why	O
the	O
police	O
were	O
called	O
to	O
Amy	O
Alexander	O
's	O
house	O
in	O
2005	O
over	O
domestic	O
violence	O
.	O

Ellison	O
was	O
in	O
a	O
relationship	O
with	O
Alexander	O
at	O
that	O
time	O
,	O
but	O
has	O
denied	O
the	O
allegations	O
.	O

He	O
fails	O
,	O
however	O
,	O
to	O
relay	O
his	O
side	O
of	O
the	O
story	O
.	O

However	O
,	O
911	O
call	O
documents	O
show	O
that	O
Alexander	O
named	O
Ellison	O
as	O
her	O
assaulter	O
.	O

#	O
MnAg	O
—	O
—	O
>	O
RT	O
@jpkolb	O
:	O
UPDATE	O
:	O
This	O
is	O
a	O
record	O
of	O
a	O
911	O
call	O
from	O
May	O
16	O
,	O
2005	O
.	O

The	O
caller	O
reported	O
she	O
was	O
assaulted	O
by	O
Keith	O
Ellison	O
.	O

pic.twitter.com/bVmrrZHC3h	O
—	O
JohnGilmore	O
(	O
@Shabbosgoy	O
)	O
August	O
13	O
,	O
2018	O

Alexander	O
is	O
not	O
the	O
only	O
woman	O
to	O
make	O
abuse	O
accusations	O
against	O
Ellison	O
.	O

On	O
August	O
11	O
,	O
2018	O
,	O
a	O
woman	O
by	O
the	O
name	O
of	O
Karen	O
Monahan	O
accused	O
Ellison	O
of	O
being	O
physically	O
and	O
verbally	O
abusive	O
towards	O
her	O
.	O

.	O

@Jerickaduncan	O
to	O
Karen	O
Monahan	O
,	O
who	O
accuses	O
ex	O
-	O
boyfriend	O
Rep.	O
Keith	O
Ellison	O
of	O
domestic	O
abuse	O
in	O
9/2016	O
incident	O
:	O
"	O
Did	O
you	O
call	O
anybody	O
after	O
that	O
?	O
"	O

Monahan	O
:	O
"	O
I	O
called	O
a	O
friend	O
,	O
&	O
I	O
said	O
,	O
'	O
I	O
'm	O
at	B-PROP
the	I-PROP
lowest	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
low	I-PROP
.	O
'	O
"	O

Ellison	O
denies	O
the	O
allegations	O
.	O

https://t.co/w6GFpTp758	O
pic.twitter.com/ISMgRoFBvs	O
—	O
CBS	O
Evening	O
News	O
(	O
@CBSEveningNews	O
)	O
August	O
17	O
,	O
2018	O

CBS	O
NEWS	O
EXCLUSIVE	O
:	O
@Jerickaduncan	O
sits	O
down	O
with	O
the	O
woman	O
alleging	O
Rep.	O
Keith	O
Ellison	O
(	O
D	O
-	O
MN	O
)	O
physically	O
abused	O
her	O
in	O
2016	O
.	O

Ellison	O
has	O
denied	O
the	O
allegations	O
.	O

https://t.co/kLFpBkZYMo	O
pic.twitter.com/3eXXAQgc6o	O
—	O
CBS	O
Evening	O
News	O
(	O
@CBSEveningNews	O
)	O
August	O
16	O
,	O
2018	O

Her	O
son	O
posted	O
the	O
allegations	O
on	O
Twitter	O
as	O
his	O
mother	O
posted	O
them	O
to	O
Twitter	O
.	O

Please	O
read	O
,	O
if	O
you	O
care	O
about	O
my	O
mother	O
please	O
share	O
.	O
I	O
love	O
you	O
momma	O
,	O
you	O
wo	O
nt	O
have	O
to	O
stand	O
...	O
Posted	O
by	O
Austin	O
Aslim	O
Monahan	O
on	O
Saturday	O
,	O
August	O
11	O
,	O
2018	O

I	O
am	O
so	O
proud	O
of	O
my	O
son	O
for	O
his	O
courage	O
.	O

But	O
this	O
situation	O
impacted	O
me	O
.	O

If	O
you	O
have	O
anything	O
to	O
say	O
,	O
please	O
say	O
it	O
me	O
and	O
leave	O
him	O
out	O
of	O
it	O
.	O

No	O
nasty	B-PROP
comments	O
to	O
him	O
https://t.co/UC84loHz1	O
m	O
—	O
Karen	O
Monahan	O
(	O
@KarenMonahan01	O
)	O
August	O
12	O
,	O
2018	O

I	O
shut	O
down	O
my	O
facebook	O
2	O
days	O
ago	O
because	O
I	O
did	O
n’t	O
want	O
my	O
kids	O
seeing	O
post	O
people	O
were	O
posting	O
to	O
me	O
.	O

I	O
really	O
ca	O
n’t	O
activate	O
it	O
now	O
cause	O
will	O
be	O
worse	O
for	O
them	O
.	O

My	O
son	O
is	O
getting	O
bullied	O
on	O
FB	O
,	O
DO	O
NOT	O
BULLY	O
MY	O
KIDS	O
.	O

tweet	O
to	O
me	O
and	O
leave	O
them	O
out	O
of	O
it	O
—	O
Karen	O
Monahan	O
(	O
@KarenMonahan01	O
)	O
August	O
12	O
,	O
2018	O

What	O
my	O
son	O
said	O
is	O
true	O
.	O

Every	O
statement	O
he	O
made	O
was	O
true	O
.	O

@keithellison	O
,	O
you	B-PROP
know	I-PROP
you	I-PROP
did	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
me	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

I	O
have	O
given	O
every	O
opportunity	O
to	O
get	O
help	O
and	O
heal	O
.	O

Even	O
now	O
,	O
u	O
r	O
willing	O
to	O
say	O
my	O
son	O
is	O
lying	O
and	O
have	O
me	O
continue	O
to	O
leak	O
more	O
text	O
and	O
info	O
just	O
so	O
others	O
will	O
believe	O
him	O
—	O
Karen	O
Monahan	O
(	O
@KarenMonahan01	O
)	O
August	O
12	O
,	O
2018	O

What	O
's	O
amazing	O
is	O
that	O
Democrats	O
cover	O
for	O
their	O
own	O
,	O
ignoring	O
the	O
obvious	O
hypocrisy	O
they	O
demonstrate	O
when	O
they	O
opponents	O
are	O
accused	O
of	O
such	O
things	O
.	O

Even	O
one	O
woman	O
in	O
the	O
Loomer	O
video	O
says	O
,	O
why	O
are	O
they	O
waiting	O
till	O
now	O
to	O
bring	O
this	O
forward	O
?	O

Well	O
,	O
for	O
Ms.	O
Monahan	O
,	O
perhaps	O
that	O
could	O
be	O
asked	O
,	O
but	O
not	O
for	O
Amy	O
Alexander	O
.	O

That	O
report	O
was	O
filed	O
more	O
than	O
a	O
decade	O
ago	O
.	O

It	O
appears	O
that	O
with	O
Ms.	O
Monahan	O
's	O
claims	O
and	O
Keith	O
Ellison	O
's	O
unwillingness	O
to	O
address	O
the	O
public	O
with	O
his	O
side	O
of	O
the	O
story	O
that	O
perhaps	O
,	O
he	O
has	O
not	O
changed	O
his	O
ways	O
at	O
all	O
.	O

In	O
fact	O
,	O
he	O
can	O
more	O
than	O
likely	O
justify	O
his	O
actions	O
based	O
upon	O
the	O
demonic	B-PROP
teachings	I-PROP
of	O
Muhammad	O
in	O
the	O
Koran	O
.	O

He	O
has	O
already	O
won	O
the	O
primary	O
to	O
be	O
Minnesota	O
's	O
AG	O
.	O

Will	B-PROP
the	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
not	I-PROP
demand	I-PROP
justice	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
vote	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
Communist	I-PROP
-	I-PROP
backed	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
Muslim	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
accused	I-PROP
woman	I-PROP
abuser	I-PROP
into	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
office	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
prosecuting	I-PROP
criminals	I-PROP
?	I-PROP

Article	O
posted	O
with	O
permission	O
from	O
Sons	O
Of	O
Liberty	O
Media	O

Texas	O
:	O
Cop	O
Walks	O
Into	O
Home	O
She	O
Thought	O
Was	O
Hers	O
,	O
Kills	O
Innocent	O
Homeowner	O
—	O
Not	O
Arrested	O

Dallas	O
,	O
TX	O
—	O
Highlighting	O
the	B-PROP
sheer	I-PROP
insane	I-PROP
state	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
law	I-PROP
enforcement	I-PROP
in	O
America	O
today	O
is	O
a	O
tragic	B-PROP
story	O
out	O
of	O
Dallas	O
this	O
week	O
.	O

An	O
off	O
-	O
duty	O
police	O
officer	O
walked	O
into	O
the	O
wrong	O
home	O
after	O
getting	O
off	O
shift	O
,	O
thought	O
the	O
homeowner	O
was	O
an	O
intruder	O
,	O
and	O
killed	O
him	O
.	O

And	O
,	O
she	O
has	O
not	O
yet	O
been	O
arrested	O
.	O

The	O
victim	O
was	O
26-year	O
-	O
old	O
Bothan	O
Shem	O
Jean	O
who	O
was	O
most	O
likely	O
startled	O
by	O
someone	O
coming	O
into	O
his	O
home	O
at	O
10:00	O
pm	O
when	O
the	O
unnamed	O
officer	O
opened	O
his	O
door	O
.	O

While	O
the	O
details	O
surrounding	O
how	O
Jean	O
was	O
killed	O
are	O
unclear	O
,	O
according	O
to	O
police	O
,	O
the	O
officer	O
admitted	O
to	O
killing	O
him	O
.	O

In	O
a	O
statement	O
released	O
on	O
Friday	O
,	O
Dallas	O
police	O
said	O
their	O
officer	O
called	O
them	O
after	O
shooting	O
Jean	O
and	O
told	O
responding	O
officers	O
that	O
“	O
she	O
entered	O
the	O
victim	O
’s	O
apartment	O
believing	O
that	O
it	O
was	O
her	O
own	O
.	O
”	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O
Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

*	O
John	O
Bolton	O
Richard	O
Grenell	O
Dina	O
Powell	O
Heather	O
Nauert	O
Ivanka	O
Trump	O

Email	O
*	O

Comments	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Freedom	O
Outpost	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

On	O
September	O
6	O
,	O
2018	O
at	O
about	O
9:59	O
p.m.	O
,	O
an	O
off	O
duty	O
Dallas	O
Police	O
officer	O
called	O
police	O
dispatch	O
and	O
said	O
she	O
was	O
involved	O
in	O
a	O
shooting	O
at	O
the	O
apartments	O
located	O
at	O
1210	O
S.	O
Lamar	O
.	O

Preliminary	O
information	O
suggests	O
that	O
the	O
officer	O
arrived	O
home	O
in	O
full	O
uniform	O
after	O
working	O
a	O
full	O
shift	O
.	O

The	O
officer	O
reported	O
to	O
the	O
responding	O
officers	O
that	O
she	O
entered	O
the	O
victim	O
’s	O
apartment	O
believing	O
that	O
it	O
was	O
her	O
own	O
.	O

At	O
some	O
point	O
,	O
the	O
officer	O
fired	O
her	O
weapon	O
striking	O
the	O
victim	O
.	O

Responding	O
officers	O
administered	O
aid	O
to	O
the	O
victim	O
,	O
a	O
26-year	O
-	O
old	O
male	O
,	O
at	O
the	O
scene	O
.	O

The	O
victim	O
was	O
then	O
transported	O
to	O
the	O
hospital	O
and	O
pronounced	O
deceased	O
.	O

Next	O
of	O
kin	O
notification	O
has	O
not	O
been	O
made	O
at	O
this	O
time	O
.	O

The	O
officer	O
was	O
not	O
injured	O
and	O
will	O
be	O
placed	O
on	O
administrative	O
leave	O
pending	O
the	O
outcome	O
of	O
the	O
investigation	O
.	O

The	O
Dallas	O
Police	O
Department	O
is	O
conducting	O
a	O
joint	O
investigation	O
with	O
the	O
District	O
Attorney	O
’s	O
Office	O
.	O

This	O
investigation	O
is	O
ongoing	O
and	O
we	O
will	O
release	O
additional	O
details	O
as	O
they	O
become	O
available	O
and	O
it	O
is	O
appropriate	O
to	O
do	O
so	O
.	O

If	O
an	O
average	O
citizen	O
walked	O
into	O
the	O
wrong	O
home	O
and	O
shot	O
and	O
killed	O
an	O
innocent	O
homeowner	O
,	O
rest	B-PROP
assured	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
would	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
jail	I-PROP
—	I-PROP
right	I-PROP
now	I-PROP
.	O

However	O
,	O
instead	O
of	O
immediately	O
arresting	O
the	O
officer	O
for	O
trespassing	O
and	O
murder	O
,	O
she	O
was	O
simply	O
placed	O
on	O
administrative	O
leave	O
—	O
a	B-PROP
glaring	I-PROP
function	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
blue	I-PROP
privilege	I-PROP
indeed	I-PROP
.	O

“	O
Super	B-PROP
scary	I-PROP
because	O
the	O
police	O
are	O
supposed	O
to	O
protect	O
you	O
and	O
then	O
they	O
come	O
home	O
and	O
,	O
you	O
know	O
,	O
you	O
’re	O
just	O
hanging	O
out	O
in	O
your	O
own	O
house	O
and	O
then	O
they	O
come	O
home	O
thinking	O
they	O
’re	O
home	O
or	O
whatever	O
.	O

I	O
do	O
n’t	O
know	O
if	O
she	O
was	O
tired	O
but	O
that	B-PROP
’s	I-PROP
pretty	B-PROP
scary	I-PROP
,	O
”	O
Richard	O
Healy	O
Nelson	O
,	O
who	O
lives	O
in	O
the	O
complex	O
,	O
said	O
to	O
reporters	O
.	O

NBC	O
News	O
spoke	O
with	O
Jean	O
’s	O
mother	O
in	O
a	O
phone	O
interview	O
from	O
her	O
home	O
in	O
St.	O
Lucia	O
who	O
was	O
stunned	O
to	O
hear	O
of	O
his	O
death	O
.	O

“	O
He	O
did	O
no	O
one	O
any	O
wrong	O
,	O
”	O
she	O
said	O
.	O

While	O
the	O
Free	O
Thought	O
Project	O
consistently	O
reports	O
on	O
police	O
officers	O
entering	O
the	O
wrong	O
home	O
during	O
raids	O
and	O
killing	O
,	O
maiming	O
,	O
or	O
traumatizing	O
entirely	O
innocent	O
people	O
,	O
this	O
is	O
the	O
first	O
time	O
we	O
’ve	O
reported	O
a	O
story	O
of	O
an	O
off	O
-	O
duty	O
cop	O
going	O
into	O
the	O
wrong	O
home	O
,	O
on	O
their	O
way	O
home	O
,	O
and	O
killing	O
someone	O
.	O

The	O
details	O
of	O
how	O
or	O
why	O
this	O
officer	O
would	O
walk	O
into	O
an	O
apartment	O
that	O
was	O
not	O
hers	O
are	O
unclear	O
.	O

However	O
,	O
what	O
is	O
entirely	O
clear	O
is	O
the	O
fact	O
that	O
a	O
mother	O
and	O
father	O
are	O
now	O
and	O
will	O
be	O
grieving	O
for	O
the	O
rest	O
of	O
their	O
lives	O
because	O
of	O
her	O
actions	O
.	O

And	O
,	O
in	O
a	O
slap	O
to	O
the	O
face	O
of	O
Jean	O
’s	O
parents	O
,	O
the	O
person	O
who	O
admitted	O
to	O
killing	O
their	O
innocent	O
son	O
has	O
yet	O
to	O
be	O
arrested	O
.	O

Article	O
posted	O
with	O
permission	O
from	O
The	O
Free	O
Thought	O
Project	O

Dallas	O
Police	O
Officer	O
Finally	O
Arrested	O
After	O
Entering	O
Wrong	O
Apartment	O
&	O
Killing	O
Man	O

Last	O
week	O
,	O
it	O
was	O
reported	O
that	O
Dallas	O
Police	O
Officer	O
Amber	O
Guyger	O
entered	O
an	O
apartment	O
she	O
claims	O
that	O
she	O
thought	O
was	O
hers	O
and	O
subsequently	O
found	O
the	O
occupant	O
of	O
that	O
apartment	O
home	O
and	O
shot	O
and	O
killed	O
him	O
,	O
claiming	O
she	O
thought	O
he	O
was	O
an	O
intruder	O
.	O

Now	O
,	O
after	O
several	O
days	O
of	O
outcry	B-PROP
from	O
the	O
community	O
,	O
Guyger	O
has	O
been	O
arrested	O
and	O
Charged	O
with	O
manslaughter	O
in	O
the	O
death	O
of	O
26-year	O
-	O
old	O
Botham	O
Jean	O
.	O

In	O
a	O
statement	O
released	O
on	O
Friday	O
,	O
Dallas	O
police	O
said	O
their	O
officer	O
called	O
them	O
after	O
shooting	O
Jean	O
and	O
told	O
responding	O
officers	O
that	O
“	O
she	O
entered	O
the	O
victim	O
’s	O
apartment	O
believing	O
that	O
it	O
was	O
her	O
own	O
.	O
”	O

On	O
September	O
6	O
,	O
2018	O
at	O
about	O
9:59	O
p.m.	O
,	O
an	O
off	O
duty	O
Dallas	O
Police	O
officer	O
called	O
police	O
dispatch	O
and	O
said	O
she	O
was	O
involved	O
in	O
a	O
shooting	O
at	O
the	O
apartments	O
located	O
at	O
1210	O
S.	O
Lamar	O
.	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O
Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

*	O
John	O
Bolton	O
Richard	O
Grenell	O
Dina	O
Powell	O
Heather	O
Nauert	O
Ivanka	O
Trump	O

Email	O
*	O

Email	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Freedom	O
Outpost	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

Preliminary	O
information	O
suggests	O
that	O
the	O
officer	O
arrived	O
home	O
in	O
full	O
uniform	O
after	O
working	O
a	O
full	O
shift	O
.	O

The	O
officer	O
reported	O
to	O
the	O
responding	O
officers	O
that	O
she	O
entered	O
the	O
victim	O
’s	O
apartment	O
believing	O
that	O
it	O
was	O
her	O
own	O
.	O

At	O
some	O
point	O
,	O
the	O
officer	O
fired	O
her	O
weapon	O
striking	O
the	O
victim	O
.	O

Responding	O
officers	O
administered	O
aid	O
to	O
the	O
victim	O
,	O
a	O
26-year	O
-	O
old	O
male	O
,	O
at	O
the	O
scene	O
.	O

The	O
victim	O
was	O
then	O
transported	O
to	O
the	O
hospital	O
and	O
pronounced	O
deceased	O
.	O

Next	O
of	O
kin	O
notification	O
has	O
not	O
been	O
made	O
at	O
this	O
time	O
.	O

The	O
officer	O
was	O
not	O
injured	O
and	O
will	O
be	O
placed	O
on	O
administrative	O
leave	O
pending	O
the	O
outcome	O
of	O
the	O
investigation	O
.	O

The	O
Dallas	O
Police	O
Department	O
is	O
conducting	O
a	O
joint	O
investigation	O
with	O
the	O
District	O
Attorney	O
’s	O
Office	O
.	O

This	O
investigation	O
is	O
ongoing	O
and	O
we	O
will	O
release	O
additional	O
details	O
as	O
they	O
become	O
available	O
and	O
it	O
is	O
appropriate	O
to	O
do	O
so	O
.	O

I	O
have	O
no	O
idea	O
how	O
you	O
can	O
enter	O
an	O
apartment	O
mistakenly	O
.	O

Does	B-PROP
Guyger	I-PROP
leave	I-PROP
her	I-PROP
door	O
unlocked	O
?	O

Furthermore	O
,	O
The	O
Dallas	O
News	O
reports	O
:	O

Jean	O
,	O
who	O
lived	O
on	O
the	O
fourth	O
floor	O
of	O
the	O
South	O
Side	O
Flats	O
in	O
the	O
Cedars	O
,	O
was	O
home	O
alone	O
when	O
Guyger	O
mistook	O
his	O
apartment	O
for	O
hers	O
,	O
the	O
affidavit	O
says	O
.	O

Guyger	O
lived	O
on	O
the	O
third	O
floor	O
,	O
directly	O
beneath	O
his	O
apartment	O
,	O
and	O
mistakenly	O
parked	O
on	O
the	O
fourth	O
floor	O
after	O
finishing	O
a	O
shift	O
at	O
the	O
Dallas	O
Police	O
Department	O
,	O
the	O
affidavit	O
says	O
.	O

When	O
she	O
arrived	O
at	O
Jean	O
's	O
door	O
,	O
Guyger	O
entered	O
a	O
unique	O
door	O
key	O
with	O
an	O
electronic	O
chip	O
into	O
the	O
keyhole	O
,	O
the	O
affidavit	O
says	O
.	O

The	O
door	O
was	O
already	O
ajar	O
,	O
so	O
the	O
force	O
of	O
pushing	O
the	O
key	O
inside	O
opened	O
the	O
door	O
,	O
according	O
to	O
the	O
affidavit	O
.	O

The	O
affidavit	O
says	O
the	O
apartments	O
'	O
"	O
respective	O
interior	O
floorplans	O
are	O
in	O
most	O
ways	O
identical	O
or	O
extremely	O
similar	O
.	O
"	O

The	O
apartment	O
was	O
dark	O
and	O
when	O
she	O
saw	O
"	O
a	O
large	O
silhouette	O
,	O
"	O
Guyger	O
thought	O
she	O
was	O
being	O
burglarized	O
,	O
the	O
affidavit	O
says	O
.	O

The	O
affidavit	O
says	O
Guyger	O
drew	O
her	O
gun	O
,	O
"	O
gave	O
verbal	O
commands	O
that	O
were	O
ignored	O
"	O
and	O
fired	O
twice	O
.	O

Jean	O
was	O
struck	O
once	O
in	O
the	O
torso	O
.	O

Guyger	O
then	O
called	O
911	O
from	O
her	O
cellphone	O
and	O
started	O
performing	O
first	O
aid	O
.	O

She	O
turned	O
on	O
the	O
lights	O
,	O
then	O
went	O
to	O
the	O
front	O
door	O
again	O
and	O
realized	O
the	O
apartment	O
was	O
n't	O
hers	O
,	O
the	O
affidavit	O
says	O
.	O

She	O
told	O
the	O
911	O
operator	O
as	O
well	O
as	O
responding	O
officers	O
that	O
she	O
thought	O
she	O
was	O
at	O
her	O
apartment	O
when	O
she	O
shot	O
Jean	O
,	O
according	O
to	O
the	O
affidavit	O
.	O

Ok	O
,	O
some	O
of	O
this	O
seems	O
plausible	O
,	O
but	O
I	O
still	O
am	O
left	O
wondering	O
about	O
the	O
door	O
being	O
ajar	O
.	O

Is	O
this	O
something	O
people	O
are	O
prone	O
to	O
do	O
at	O
1o	O
o'clock	O
at	O
night	O
in	O
Dallas	O
?	O

In	O
any	O
case	O
,	O
we	O
all	O
know	O
that	O
any	O
of	O
us	O
who	O
did	O
the	O
same	O
thing	O
would	O
have	O
immediately	O
been	O
taken	O
into	O
custody	O
.	O

This	O
was	O
not	O
the	O
case	O
with	O
Guyger	O
,	O
though	O
one	O
officer	O
close	O
to	O
her	O
said	O
,	O
"	O
she	O
is	O
devastated	O
.	O
"	O

Knowing	O
this	O
provoked	O
outrage	O
across	O
the	O
nation	O
over	O
the	O
weekend	O
.	O

In	O
fact	O
,	O
this	O
is	O
not	O
her	O
first	O
shooting	O
.	O

As	O
a	O
four	O
-	O
year	O
veteran	O
of	O
the	O
force	O
,	O
she	O
was	O
also	O
involved	O
in	O
the	O
shooting	O
of	O
another	O
suspect	O
in	O
2017	O
.	O

The	O
Dallas	O
News	O
reported	O
:	O

In	O
2017	O
,	O
Guyger	O
shot	O
47-year	O
-	O
old	O
Uvaldo	O
Perez	O
,	O
who	O
had	O
wrestled	O
a	O
Taser	O
away	O
from	O
her	O
.	O

Another	O
officer	O
had	O
been	O
in	O
a	O
Pleasant	O
Grove	O
neighborhood	O
looking	O
for	O
a	O
woman	O
who	O
had	O
a	O
warrant	O
out	O
for	O
her	O
arrest	O
.	O

When	O
the	O
officer	O
thought	O
he	O
saw	O
the	O
woman	O
in	O
a	O
car	O
with	O
two	O
men	O
in	O
the	O
8300	O
block	O
of	O
Reva	O
Street	O
,	O
the	O
officer	O
asked	O
for	O
backup	O
from	O
Guyger	O
and	O
another	O
officer	O
,	O
according	O
to	O
an	O
affidavit	O
.	O

One	O
of	O
the	O
officers	O
was	O
trying	O
to	O
search	O
Perez	O
when	O
he	O
became	O
combative	O
,	O
the	O
affidavit	O
said	O
.	O

Guyger	O
deployed	O
her	O
Taser	O
before	O
Perez	O
was	O
able	O
to	O
take	O
it	O
from	O
her	O
.	O

After	O
Perez	O
had	O
the	O
Taser	O
,	O
Guyger	O
fired	O
her	O
gun	O
once	O
,	O
striking	O
him	O
in	O
the	O
abdomen	O
,	O
the	O
affidavit	O
said	O
.	O

Neither	O
Guyger	O
nor	O
the	O
other	O
officers	O
were	O
injured	O
in	O
the	O
2017	O
shooting	O
.	O

Police	O
arrested	O
Perez	O
on	O
a	O
charge	O
of	O
taking	O
a	O
weapon	O
from	O
an	O
officer	O
,	O
as	O
well	O
as	O
charges	O
for	O
possession	O
of	O
methamphetamine	O
,	O
marijuana	O
and	O
violating	O
his	O
parole	O
.	O

In	O
February	O
2018	O
,	O
Perez	O
signed	O
a	O
plea	O
agreement	O
for	O
the	O
charge	O
of	O
taking	O
an	O
officer	O
's	O
weapon	O
and	O
was	O
sentenced	O
to	O
two	O
years	O
in	O
prison	O
.	O

The	O
Texas	O
Rangers	O
are	O
also	O
involved	O
in	O
the	O
investigation	O
.	O

USA	O
Today	O
reports	O
that	O
Guyger	O
was	O
freed	O
on	O
bail	O
on	O
Sunday	O
after	O
being	O
charged	O
with	O
manslaughter	O
,	O
and	O
faces	O
two	O
20-year	O
sentences	O
and	O
up	O
to	O
a	O
$	O
10,000	O
fine	O
.	O

A	O
charge	O
of	O
murder	O
may	O
be	O
forthcoming	O
once	O
the	O
case	O
is	O
taken	O
to	O
a	O
grand	O
jury	O
,	O
according	O
to	O
Dallas	O
County	O
District	O
Attorney	O
Faith	O
Johnson	O
.	O

Dallas	O
Police	O
Attempt	O
to	B-PROP
‘	I-PROP
Smear	I-PROP
’	O
Botham	O
Jean	O
Over	O
Tiny	O
Bit	O
of	O
Weed	O
and	O
they	O
Failed	O
,	O
Miserably	B-PROP

Dallas	O
,	O
TX	O
—	O
The	O
Dallas	O
Police	O
on	O
Thursday	O
announced	O
the	O
findings	O
of	O
a	O
search	O
warrant	O
they	O
executed	O
on	O
the	O
home	O
of	O
Botham	O
Jean	O
after	O
he	O
was	O
gunned	O
down	O
in	O
his	O
apartment	O
by	O
one	O
of	O
their	O
own	O
.	O

The	O
department	O
is	O
now	O
accused	O
of	O
trying	O
to	O
“	O
smear	B-PROP
”	O
Jean	O
by	O
claiming	O
they	O
found	O
a	O
tiny	O
bit	O
of	O
marijuana	O
in	O
his	O
house	O
—	O
as	B-PROP
if	I-PROP
this	I-PROP
justifies	I-PROP
going	I-PROP
into	I-PROP
someone	I-PROP
’s	I-PROP
home	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
murdering	I-PROP
them	I-PROP
.	O

The	B-PROP
timing	I-PROP
could	I-PROP
n’t	I-PROP
have	I-PROP
been	I-PROP
more	I-PROP
insidiously	I-PROP
planned	I-PROP
as	O
police	O
released	O
the	O
affidavit	O
on	O
the	O
day	O
of	O
Jean	O
’s	O
funeral	O
—	O
despite	O
having	O
allegedly	O
found	O
the	O
marijuana	O
last	O
week	O
.	O

According	O
to	O
the	O
affidavit	O
,	O
when	O
they	O
searched	O
his	O
home	O
,	O
police	O
claimed	O
to	O
have	O
found	O
10.4	O
grams	O
of	O
pot	O
—	O
less	O
than	O
half	O
an	O
ounce	O
.	O

Police	O
also	O
said	O
they	O
found	O
two	O
fired	O
cartridge	O
casings	O
,	O
a	O
police	O
backpack	O
and	O
vest	O
,	O
and	O
a	O
metal	O
marijuana	O
grinder	O
—	O
the	B-PROP
horror	I-PROP
.	O

Even	O
if	O
police	O
did	O
find	O
marijuana	O
,	O
why	B-PROP
on	I-PROP
earth	I-PROP
would	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
execute	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
search	I-PROP
warrant	I-PROP
on	I-PROP
an	I-PROP
innocent	I-PROP
dead	I-PROP
man	I-PROP
’s	I-PROP
home	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
then	I-PROP
release	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
information	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
public	I-PROP
?	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

*	O
John	O
Bolton	O
Richard	O
Grenell	O
Dina	O
Powell	O
Heather	O
Nauert	O
Ivanka	O
Trump	O

Email	O
*	O

Phone	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Freedom	O
Outpost	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

“	O
They	O
[	O
police	O
]	O
immediately	O
began	O
looking	O
to	B-PROP
smear	I-PROP
him	I-PROP
,	O
”	O
attorney	O
Lee	O
Merritt	O
said	O
.	O

“	O
I	O
think	O
it	O
’s	O
unfortunate	O
that	O
law	O
enforcement	O
begin	O
to	O
immediately	O
criminalize	O
the	O
victim	O
—	O
in	O
this	O
case	O
,	O
someone	O
who	O
was	O
clearly	O
was	O
the	O
victim	O
that	O
has	O
absolutely	O
no	O
bearing	O
on	O
the	O
fact	O
that	O
he	O
was	O
shot	O
in	O
his	O
home	O
,	O
”	O
Merritt	O
added	O
to	O
Fox	O
4	O
.	O

Pointing	O
out	O
the	O
glaring	B-PROP
nature	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
smear	B-PROP
campaign	I-PROP
was	O
the	O
fact	O
that	O
there	O
has	O
been	O
absolutely	B-PROP
zero	I-PROP
information	I-PROP
released	O
about	O
the	O
warrants	O
conducted	O
on	O
officer	O
Amber	O
Guyger	O
,	O
the	O
killer	B-PROP
cop	I-PROP
who	O
lived	O
just	O
below	O
Jean	O
.	O

“	O
I	O
would	O
love	O
to	O
see	O
more	O
information	O
coming	O
out	O
about	O
the	O
warrants	O
executed	O
on	O
the	O
home	O
of	O
the	O
shooter	O
who	O
lived	O
just	O
below	O
him	O
.	O

I	O
have	O
n’t	O
seen	O
any	O
of	O
those	O
,	O
”	O
said	O
Merritt	O
.	O

Merritt	O
accused	O
the	O
department	O
of	O
conducting	O
a	O
“	O
common	O
assassination	O
attempt	O
on	O
the	O
victim	O
that	O
we	O
often	O
see	O
in	O
law	O
enforcement	O
involved	O
shootings	O
.	O
”	O
Sadly	O
,	O
he	O
appears	O
to	O
be	O
correct	O
in	O
his	O
accusations	O
.	O

It	O
is	O
standard	O
procedure	O
for	O
police	O
to	O
dig	O
up	O
dirt	O
on	O
their	O
victims	O
in	O
attempts	O
to	O
smear	B-PROP
and	I-PROP
assassinate	I-PROP
their	I-PROP
character	I-PROP
to	B-PROP
make	I-PROP
the	B-PROP
killer	I-PROP
cops	I-PROP
look	I-PROP
good	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
public	I-PROP
eye	I-PROP
.	O

Even	B-PROP
sadder	I-PROP
,	O
however	O
,	O
is	O
the	O
fact	O
that	O
these	O
smear	B-PROP
campaigns	I-PROP
work	O
most	O
of	O
the	O
time	O
.	O

As	O
the	O
Free	O
Thought	O
Project	O
reported	O
on	O
Wednesday	O
,	O
according	O
to	O
police	O
—	O
who	O
continue	O
to	O
attempt	O
to	O
spin	O
this	O
story	O
into	O
some	O
tragic	B-PROP
mistake	O
—	O
Guyger	O
accidentally	O
went	O
into	O
the	O
wrong	O
apartment	O
,	O
mistook	O
Jean	O
for	O
an	O
intruder	O
and	O
killed	O
him	O
.	O

“	O
Guyger	O
entered	O
the	O
building	O
and	O
walked	O
down	O
the	O
fourth	O
-	O
floor	O
hallway	O
to	O
what	O
she	O
thought	O
was	O
her	O
apartment	O
,	O
”	O
according	O
to	O
the	O
arrest	O
warrant	O
made	O
public	O
Monday	O
afternoon	O
.	O

“	O
She	O
inserted	O
a	O
unique	O
door	O
key	O
,	O
with	O
an	O
electronic	O
chip	O
,	O
into	O
the	O
door	O
keyhole	O
.	O

The	O
door	O
,	O
which	O
was	O
slightly	O
ajar	O
prior	O
to	O
Guyger	O
’s	O
arrival	O
,	O
fully	O
opened	O
under	O
the	O
force	O
of	O
the	O
key	O
insertion	O
.	O
”	O

“	O
Guyger	O
drew	O
her	O
firearm	O
,	O
gave	O
verbal	O
commands	O
that	O
were	O
ignored	O
by	O
…	O
Jean	O
,	O
”	O
according	O
to	O
the	O
warrant	O
.	O

“	O
Guyger	O
fired	O
her	O
handgun	O
two	O
times	O
striking	O
[	O
Jean	O
]	O
in	O
the	O
torso	O
.	O

Guyger	O
entered	O
the	O
apartment	O
,	O
immediately	O
called	O
911	O
,	O
requesting	O
police	O
and	O
EMS	O
,	O
and	O
provided	O
first	O
aid	O
to	O
…	O
Jean	O
.	O

“	O
Due	O
to	O
the	O
interior	O
darkness	O
of	O
the	O
apartment	O
,	O
Guyger	O
turned	O
on	O
the	O
interior	O
lights	O
while	O
on	O
the	O
phone	O
with	O
911	O
.	O

Upon	O
being	O
asked	O
where	O
she	O
was	O
located	O
by	O
emergency	O
dispatchers	O
,	O
Guyger	O
returned	O
to	O
the	O
front	O
door	O
to	O
observe	O
the	O
address	O
and	O
discovered	O
she	O
was	O
at	O
the	O
wrong	O
apartment	O
,	O
”	O
according	O
to	O
the	O
arrest	O
warrant	O
.	O

At	O
no	O
time	O
,	O
according	O
to	O
the	O
warrant	O
,	O
does	O
Guyger	O
say	O
what	O
“	O
verbal	O
commands	O
”	O
she	O
gave	O
.	O

What	O
’s	O
more	O
,	O
any	O
verbal	O
commands	O
she	O
did	O
give	O
were	O
entirely	B-PROP
irrelevant	I-PROP
as	O
she	O
was	O
the	B-PROP
intruder	I-PROP
—	I-PROP
not	I-PROP
Jean	I-PROP
.	O

Attempting	O
to	O
imply	O
that	O
Jean	O
was	O
somehow	O
at	O
fault	O
for	O
his	O
own	O
death	O
for	O
disobeying	O
the	O
commands	O
of	O
a	B-PROP
homicidal	I-PROP
cop	I-PROP
who	I-PROP
’d	I-PROP
just	I-PROP
illegally	I-PROP
broken	I-PROP
into	I-PROP
his	I-PROP
home	I-PROP
is	O
as	O
irresponsible	O
as	O
it	O
is	O
reprehensible	O
.	O

What	O
’s	O
more	O
,	O
according	O
to	O
the	O
attorneys	O
for	O
Jean	O
,	O
when	O
Guyger	O
was	O
on	O
the	O
phone	O
with	O
police	O
,	O
she	O
had	O
to	O
go	O
outside	O
to	O
verify	O
the	O
address	O
of	O
the	O
apartment	O
—	O
implying	O
that	O
she	O
knew	O
she	O
was	O
in	O
the	O
wrong	O
apartment	O
from	O
the	O
start	O
.	O

“	O
From	O
the	O
fact	O
that	O
when	O
you	O
look	O
at	O
an	O
affidavit	O
and	O
I	O
’m	O
thinking	O
that	O
I	O
’m	O
at	O
my	O
house	O
and	O
I	O
call	O
911	O
because	O
someone	O
was	O
just	O
shot	O
,	O
”	O
Attorney	O
Daryl	O
Washington	O
said	O
.	O

“	O
Well	O
,	O
the	O
very	O
first	O
thing	O
that	O
I	O
’m	O
going	O
to	O
do	O
is	O
I	O
’m	O
not	O
going	O
to	O
go	O
outside	O
and	O
look	O
at	O
my	O
address	O
?	O

I	O
’m	O
going	O
to	O
give	O
them	O
my	O
address	O
right	O
there	O
on	O
the	O
phone	O
.	O

I	O
’m	O
going	O
to	O
say	O
I	O
’m	O
on	O
the	O
phone	O
.	O

My	O
address	O
is	O
this	O
.	O

Why	O
did	O
she	O
have	O
to	O
go	O
outside	O
to	O
verify	O
the	O
address	O
?	O

It	B-PROP
makes	I-PROP
no	I-PROP
sense	I-PROP
whatsoever	I-PROP
.	O
”	O

Even	O
more	B-PROP
ominous	I-PROP
than	O
having	O
to	O
verify	O
the	O
address	O
is	O
the	O
fact	O
that	O
according	O
to	O
witnesses	O
,	O
Guyger	O
’s	O
story	O
of	O
inserting	O
the	O
key	O
into	O
Jean	O
’s	O
door	O
and	O
it	O
opening	O
up	O
was	O
simply	O
not	O
true	O
.	O

According	O
to	O
witnesses	O
,	O
Guyger	O
was	O
banging	O
on	O
Jean	O
’s	O
door	O
,	O
demanding	O
he	O
let	O
her	O
in	O
.	O

“	O
Independent	O
witnesses	O
have	O
already	O
come	O
forward	O
to	O
say	O
that	O
they	O
heard	O
this	O
officer	O
pounding	O
on	O
the	O
door	O
and	O
demanding	O
to	O
be	O
let	O
in	O
,	O
”	O
Lee	O
Merritt	O
,	O
one	O
of	O
the	O
attorneys	O
representing	O
the	O
Jean	O
family	O
,	O
told	O
ABC	O
News	O
.	O

“	O
The	O
contradictions	O
begin	O
to	O
build	O
from	O
there	O
.	O
”	O

The	O
doors	O
in	O
the	O
complex	O
are	O
also	O
equipped	O
with	O
an	O
automatic	O
closing	O
mechanism	O
.	O

This	O
was	O
demonstrated	O
by	O
the	O
attorneys	O
who	O
opened	O
the	O
door	O
and	O
released	O
it	O
several	O
times	O
—	O
showing	O
that	O
it	O
closed	O
every	O
single	O
time	O
—	O
blowing	B-PROP
the	O
claim	O
that	O
the	O
door	O
was	O
somehow	O
ajar	B-PROP
completely	I-PROP
out	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
water	I-PROP
.	O

Jean	O
’s	O
family	O
also	O
pointed	O
out	O
that	O
it	O
would	O
have	O
been	O
incredibly	B-PROP
unlikely	I-PROP
for	O
Guyger	O
to	O
mistake	O
Jean	O
’s	O
apartment	O
for	O
her	O
own	O
as	O
he	O
had	O
a	O
distinct	O
red	O
door	O
mat	O
which	O
would	O
have	O
been	O
enough	O
for	O
the	O
cop	O
to	O
know	O
she	O
was	O
at	O
the	O
wrong	O
place	O
.	O

The	O
hallway	O
outside	O
the	O
apartment	O
where	O
Botham	O
Jean	O
was	O
shot	O
and	O
killed	O
by	O
a	O
Dallas	O
Police	O
officer	O
.	O

pic.twitter.com/2xN9xqppRC	O
—	O
Allison	O
Harris	O
(	O
@AllisonFox4News	O
)	O
September	O
8	O
,	O
2018	O

Even	O
as	O
cops	O
come	O
to	O
Guyger	O
’s	O
defense	O
and	O
attempt	O
to	O
shame	O
,	O
smear	O
,	O
and	O
discredit	O
her	O
victim	O
—	O
who	O
was	O
an	B-PROP
upstanding	I-PROP
member	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
society	I-PROP
regardless	O
of	O
the	O
plant	O
they	O
claim	O
to	O
have	O
found	O
—	O
they	O
are	O
failing	B-PROP
miserably	I-PROP
.	O

Despite	O
cops	O
rallying	O
behind	O
the	O
blue	O
line	O
to	O
defend	O
this	O
killer	B-PROP
cop	I-PROP
,	O
the	O
rest	O
of	O
the	O
country	O
is	O
not	O
buying	O
it	O
.	O

In	O
a	O
damning	B-PROP
tweet	O
,	O
writer	O
Kashana	O
Cauley	O
summed	O
up	O
the	O
nature	O
of	O
the	O
smear	B-PROP
campaign	I-PROP
quite	O
succinctly	O
.	O

In	O
response	O
to	O
cops	O
claiming	O
to	O
find	O
a	O
tiny	O
bit	O
of	O
weed	O
,	O
she	O
pointed	O
out	O
that	O
there	O
was	O
also	O
a	B-PROP
homicidal	I-PROP
cop	I-PROP
inside	O
too	O
.	O

His	O
apartment	O
also	O
contained	O
an	O
off	O
duty	O
homicidal	B-PROP
cop	O
.	O

https://t.co/Nq5wDpmukq	O
—	O
Kashana	O
(	O
@kashanacauley	O
)	O
September	O
13	O
,	O
2018	O

Article	O
posted	O
with	O
permission	O
from	O
The	O
Free	O
Thought	O
Project	O

New	O
Mexico	O
Jihadis	O
’	O
Defense	O
Attorney	O
:	O
“	O
If	B-PROP
These	I-PROP
Were	I-PROP
White	I-PROP
Christians	I-PROP
…	I-PROP
No	I-PROP
One	I-PROP
Would	I-PROP
Bat	I-PROP
An	I-PROP
Eye	I-PROP
”	O

Editor	O
's	O
Note	O
:	O
If	O
they	O
were	O
white	O
,	O
devout	O
Christians	O
,	O
we	O
would	O
n't	O
hear	O
about	O
this	O
cause	O
it	O
would	O
have	O
never	O
taken	O
place	O
because	O
it	O
would	O
have	O
gone	O
against	O
the	O
teachings	O
of	O
Christ	O
and	O
there	O
would	O
have	O
been	O
an	O
outcry	O
by	O
Christians	O
everywhere	O
against	O
people	O
might	O
engage	O
in	O
such	O
behavior	O
and	O
would	O
claim	O
such	O
things	O
.	O

"	O
Federal	O
prosecutors	O
say	O
that	O
between	O
Dec.	O
2017	O
and	O
August	O
2018	O
,	O
the	O
group	O
,	O
who	O
are	O
either	O
siblings	O
or	O
related	O
by	O
marriage	O
,	O
had	O
‘	O
a	O
common	O
plan	O
to	O
prepare	O
for	O
violent	O
attacks	O
on	O
government	O
,	O
military	O
,	O
educational	O
and	O
financial	O
institutions	O
.	O

'	O
"	O

Yeah	O
,	O
if	O
they	O
were	O
white	O
Christians	O
,	O
no	O
one	O
would	O
care	O
about	O
that	O
.	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

*	O
John	O
Bolton	O
Richard	O
Grenell	O
Dina	O
Powell	O
Heather	O
Nauert	O
Ivanka	O
Trump	O

Email	O
*	O

Name	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Freedom	O
Outpost	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

“	O
Federal	O
Judge	O
Denies	O
New	O
Mexico	O
Compound	O
Residents	O
Bail	O
,	O
”	O
by	O
Vanessa	O
Romo	O
,	O
KRWG	O
,	O
September	O
13	O
,	O
2018	O
:	O

A	O
federal	O
judge	O
denied	O
bail	O
on	O
Wednesday	O
to	O
all	O
five	O
members	O
of	O
an	O
extended	O
family	O
accused	O
of	O
operating	O
a	O
training	O
camp	O
for	O
a	O
violent	B-PROP
attack	O
on	O
public	O
institutions	O
out	O
of	O
their	O
isolated	O
New	O
Mexico	O
compound	O
.	O

During	O
the	O
arraignment	O
hearing	O
,	O
Magistrate	O
Judge	O
Kirtan	O
Khalsa	O
told	O
the	O
defendants	O
there	O
was	O
“	O
clear	B-PROP
and	O
convincing	O
evidence	O
that	O
you	B-PROP
are	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
danger	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
community	I-PROP
,	O
”	O
The	O
Associated	O
Press	O
reported	O
.	O

A	O
federal	O
grand	O
jury	O
indicted	O
the	O
group	O
on	O
Tuesday	O
on	O
conspiracy	O
and	O
federal	O
firearms	O
charges	O
stemming	O
from	O
the	O
discovery	O
of	O
a	O
cache	O
of	O
weapons	O
after	O
law	O
enforcement	O
raided	O
their	O
home	O
in	O
search	O
of	O
a	O
missing	O
boy	O
but	O
,	O
instead	O
,	O
found	O
11	O
malnourished	B-PROP
children	O
living	O
in	O
squalid	B-PROP
conditions	I-PROP
.	O

Federal	O
prosecutors	O
say	O
that	O
between	O
Dec.	O
2017	O
and	O
August	O
2018	O
,	O
the	O
group	O
,	O
who	O
are	O
either	O
siblings	O
or	O
related	O
by	O
marriage	O
,	O
had	O
“	O
a	O
common	O
plan	O
to	O
prepare	O
for	O
violent	O
attacks	O
on	O
government	O
,	O
military	O
,	O
educational	O
and	O
financial	O
institutions	O
.	O
”	O
U.S.	O
Attorney	O
John	O
C.	O
Anderson	O
and	O
Special	O
Agent	O
in	O
Charge	O
James	O
C.	O
Langenberg	O
of	O
the	O
FBI	O
’s	O
Albuquerque	O
Division	O
,	O
said	O
in	O
a	O
statement	O
that	O
the	O
defendants	O
’	O
home	O
in	O
Amalia	O
,	O
N.M.	O
,	O
served	O
as	O
a	O
firing	O
range	O
and	O
training	O
camp	O
to	O
carry	O
out	O
an	O
attack	O
as	O
part	O
of	O
a	O
religious	O
prophecy	O
.	O

According	O
to	O
the	O
indictment	O
,	O
some	O
of	O
the	O
minors	O
were	O
being	O
prepared	O
“	O
to	B-PROP
engage	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
jihad	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
…	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
die	I-PROP
as	I-PROP
martyrs	I-PROP
.	O
”	O
…	O
Siraj	O
Ibn	O
Wahhaj	O
’s	O
lawyer	O
in	O
the	O
state	O
case	O
,	O
suggested	O
that	O
those	O
charges	O
were	O
motivated	O
by	O
a	O
degree	O
of	O
racial	O
and	O
religious	O
prejudice	O
against	O
his	O
Muslim	O
client	O
.	O

If	O
the	O
suspects	O
were	O
white	O
Christians	O
shooting	O
guns	O
on	O
their	O
property	O
and	O
practicing	O
their	O
religion	O
,	O
“	O
No	O
one	O
would	O
bat	O
an	O
eye	O
,	O
”	O
Thomas	O
Clark	O
argued	O
in	O
court	O
.	O

“	O
If	O
these	O
were	O
white	O
people	O
of	O
a	O
Christian	O
faith	O
who	O
owned	O
guns	O
,	O
that	O
’s	O
not	O
a	O
big	O
deal	O
because	O
there	B-PROP
’s	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
Second	I-PROP
Amendment	I-PROP
right	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
own	I-PROP
firearms	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
this	I-PROP
country	I-PROP
.	O

If	O
these	O
were	O
white	O
Christians	O
,	O
faith	O
healing	O
is	O
of	O
no	O
consequence	O
because	O
we	O
have	O
freedom	O
of	O
religion	O
in	O
this	O
country	O
.	O

But	O
they	O
look	O
different	O
and	O
they	O
worship	O
differently	O
from	O
the	O
rest	O
of	O
us	O
,	O
”	O
Clark	O
said	O
…	O
.	O

Last	O
month	O
,	O
two	O
state	O
judges	O
were	O
forced	O
to	O
dismiss	O
child	O
neglect	O
charges	O
against	O
all	O
five	O
adults	O
when	O
the	O
local	O
district	O
attorney	O
’s	O
office	O
missed	O
a	O
10-day	O
deadline	O
to	O
present	O
initial	O
evidence	O
of	O
crime	O
.	O

A	O
few	O
days	O
later	O
,	O
Taos	O
-	O
based	O
District	O
Attorney	O
Donald	O
Gallegos	O
dropped	O
charges	O
related	O
to	O
the	O
death	O
of	O
Siraj	O
Wahhaj	O
’s	O
son	O
,	O
“	O
saying	O
he	O
was	O
seeking	O
more	O
time	O
to	O
assemble	O
and	O
analyze	O
evidence	O
,	O
and	O
that	O
he	O
intended	O
to	O
seek	O
grand	O
jury	O
indictment	O
,	O
”	O
The	O
Durango	O
Herald	O
reported	O
.	O

Article	O
posted	O
with	O
permission	O
from	O
Robert	O
Spencer	O

Warrants	O
Show	O
Police	O
Never	O
Searched	O
Amber	O
Guyger	O
’s	O
Apartment	O
,	O
Now	O
It	O
’s	O
Too	O
Late	O
,	O
She	O
’s	O
‘	O
Vacated	O
’	O
It	O

Dallas	O
,	O
TX	O
—	O
On	O
Sunday	O
,	O
activists	O
rallied	O
around	O
the	O
Dallas	O
Cowboy	O
’s	O
stadium	O
to	O
draw	O
attention	O
to	O
the	O
slaying	O
of	O
Botham	O
Jean	O
.	O

They	O
carried	O
coffins	O
and	O
blocked	O
traffic	O
to	O
expose	O
the	O
special	O
treatment	O
of	O
Amber	O
Guyger	O
,	O
the	O
cop	O
who	O
has	O
yet	O
to	O
even	O
be	O
fired	O
for	O
killing	O
Jean	O
.	O

Now	O
,	O
as	O
more	O
details	O
emerge	O
,	O
this	O
special	O
treatment	O
has	O
moved	O
to	O
a	O
level	O
that	O
is	O
even	B-PROP
more	I-PROP
insidious	I-PROP
.	O

Protest	O
at	O
AT&T	O
Stadium	O
pic.twitter.com/lu5VsGQByv	O
—	O
Allison	O
Harris	O
(	O
@AllisonFox4News	O
)	O
September	O
16	O
,	O
2018	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

*	O
John	O
Bolton	O
Richard	O
Grenell	O
Dina	O
Powell	O
Heather	O
Nauert	O
Ivanka	O
Trump	O

Email	O
*	O

Email	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Freedom	O
Outpost	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

From	O
the	O
beginning	O
of	O
this	O
case	O
,	O
it	O
was	O
clear	O
that	O
Guyger	O
was	O
receiving	O
special	O
treatment	O
from	O
law	O
enforcement	O
.	O

One	O
of	O
the	O
most	O
glaring	B-PROP
instances	O
showing	O
her	O
privilege	O
was	O
the	O
fact	O
that	O
the	O
Texas	O
Rangers	O
said	O
in	O
their	O
report	O
that	O
Jean	O
refused	O
to	O
obey	O
Guyger	O
’s	O
“	O
verbal	O
commands	O
.	O
”	O
Had	B-PROP
anyone	I-PROP
else	I-PROP
but	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
cop	I-PROP
walked	O
into	O
an	O
apartment	O
and	O
killed	O
an	O
innocent	O
man	O
,	O
do	O
you	O
believe	O
that	O
investigators	O
would	O
have	O
said	O
anything	O
like	O
this	O
?	O

Attorney	O
Stephen	O
Le	O
Brocq	O
,	O
who	O
operates	O
a	O
law	O
firm	O
in	O
the	O
North	O
Texas	O
area	O
sums	O
up	O
the	O
treatment	O
of	O
Guyger	O
perfectly	O
when	O
he	O
says	O
that	O
“	O
The	O
affidavit	O
is	O
n’t	O
written	O
objectively	O
,	O
not	O
at	O
the	O
slightest	O
.	O

As	O
stated	O
before	O
,	O
they	O
are	O
usually	O
wholly	O
against	O
the	O
accused	O
.	O

An	O
objective	O
view	O
of	O
the	O
information	O
related	O
by	O
the	O
officer	O
would	O
be	O
proper	O
,	O
in	O
my	O
opinion	O
.	O

This	O
affidavit	O
states	O
facts	O
based	O
upon	O
the	O
word	O
of	O
the	O
person	O
it	O
seeks	O
to	O
accuse	O
of	O
criminal	O
wrongdoing	O
.	O
”	O

What	O
’s	O
more	O
,	O
according	O
to	O
WFAA	O
,	O
who	O
obtained	O
affidavits	O
for	O
all	O
of	O
the	O
search	O
warrants	O
involved	O
in	O
the	O
case	O
,	O
none	O
of	O
them	O
involved	O
the	O
search	O
of	O
Guyger	O
’s	O
apartment	O
.	O

For	O
those	O
who	O
do	O
n’t	O
recall	O
,	O
police	O
egregiously	B-PROP
released	O
the	O
search	O
warrant	O
findings	O
of	O
Jean	O
’s	O
apartment	O
on	O
the	O
day	O
his	O
family	O
buried	O
his	O
dead	O
body	O
.	O

They	O
attempted	O
to	O
assassinate	O
Jean	O
’s	O
character	O
by	O
claiming	O
they	O
found	O
less	O
than	O
a	O
half	O
ounce	O
of	O
weed	O
in	O
his	O
apartment	O
.	O

However	O
,	O
they	O
failed	B-PROP
miserably	I-PROP
at	O
it	O
.	O

One	O
thing	O
in	O
particular	O
,	O
however	O
,	O
stood	O
out	O
to	O
those	O
paying	O
attention	O
and	O
that	O
is	O
the	O
fact	O
the	O
police	O
did	O
n’t	O
release	O
any	O
information	O
on	O
what	O
they	O
found	O
in	O
Guyger	O
’s	O
apartment	O
.	O

According	B-PROP
to	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
information	I-PROP
currently	I-PROP
available	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
’s	I-PROP
because	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
did	I-PROP
n’t	I-PROP
search	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
.	O

According	O
to	O
WFAA	O
,	O
there	O
were	O
five	O
search	O
warrants	O
issued	O
in	O
the	O
case	O
—	O
none	O
of	O
which	O
were	O
for	O
the	O
killer	O
’s	O
apartment	O
.	O

As	O
WFAA	O
reports	O
:	O

Two	O
of	O
the	O
warrants	O
allowed	O
investigators	O
to	O
remove	O
the	O
front	O
door	O
of	O
Guyger	O
and	O
Jean	O
’s	O
apartment	O
,	O
their	O
door	O
locks	O
and	O
to	O
download	O
data	O
for	O
their	O
door	O
locks	O
.	O

An	O
inventory	O
return	O
states	O
that	O
they	O
removed	O
both	O
of	O
their	O
door	O
lock	O
and	O
downloaded	O
the	O
data	O
from	O
the	O
door	O
locks	O
.	O

A	O
third	O
search	O
warrant	O
gave	O
investigators	O
the	O
authority	O
to	O
enter	O
Jean	O
’s	O
apartment	O
and	O
collect	O
additional	O
evidence	O
.	O

A	O
return	O
shows	O
that	O
investigators	O
took	O
photographs	O
of	O
his	O
apartment	O
,	O
made	O
videos	O
of	O
his	O
apartment	O
,	O
conducted	O
“	O
laser	O
measurements	O
of	O
firearm	O
trajectory	O
,	O
”	O
and	O
collected	O
“	O
gunshot	O
residue	O
”	O
from	O
the	O
door	O
frame	O
and	O
kitchen	O
wall	O
of	O
Jean	O
’s	O
apartment	O
.	O

A	O
return	O
for	O
the	O
fourth	O
search	O
warrant	O
shows	O
investigators	O
seized	O
video	O
from	O
the	O
surveillance	O
camera	O
system	O
in	O
the	O
apartment	O
management	O
’s	O
office	O
.	O

A	O
fifth	O
search	O
warrant	O
gave	O
investigators	O
the	O
authority	O
to	O
obtain	O
all	O
communications	O
related	O
to	O
the	O
incident	O
in	O
the	O
possession	O
of	O
property	O
management	O
,	O
as	O
well	O
as	O
all	O
surveillance	O
video	O
and	O
all	O
entry	O
and	O
access	O
logs	O
from	O
9	O
p.m.	O
to	O
11	O
p.m.	O
on	O
the	O
night	O
of	O
the	O
shooting	O
.	O

An	O
inventory	O
return	O
shows	O
investigators	O
seized	O
a	O
USB	O
drive	O
containing	O
the	O
video	O
,	O
an	O
event	O
log	O
report	O
for	O
“	O
linear	O
access	O
doors	O
and	O
gates	O
,	O
”	O
an	O
“	O
elevator	O
access	O
door	O
lock	O
”	O
report	O
and	O
a	O
“	O
lock	O
audit	O
report	O
for	O
both	O
apartments	O
.	O

Now	O
,	O
even	O
if	O
police	O
would	O
try	O
to	O
search	O
the	O
killer	B-PROP
cop	I-PROP
’s	O
apartment	O
,	O
it	O
’s	O
too	O
late	O
.	O

On	O
Sunday	O
,	O
apartment	O
staff	O
notified	O
residents	O
in	O
an	O
email	O
that	O
Guyger	O
“	O
has	O
vacated	O
her	O
apartment	O
and	O
no	O
longer	O
resides	O
at	O
our	O
community	O
.	O
”	O

A	O
manager	O
at	O
the	O
complex	O
declined	O
to	O
indicate	O
exactly	O
when	O
Guyger	O
moved	O
out	O
and	O
if	O
she	O
left	O
the	O
premises	O
voluntarily	O
,	O
the	O
Dallas	O
Morning	O
News	O
reports	O
.	O

While	O
residents	O
can	O
certainly	O
sleep	O
better	O
knowing	O
that	O
they	O
do	O
n’t	O
have	O
to	O
fear	O
a	O
killer	B-PROP
cop	I-PROP
walking	O
into	O
their	O
apartment	O
and	O
murdering	O
them	O
,	O
the	O
family	O
of	O
Botham	O
Jean	O
likely	O
sees	O
this	O
as	O
one	O
more	O
instance	O
of	O
injustice	O
.	O

Mother	O
of	O
#	O
BothamJean	O
,	O
Allison	O
Jean	O
,	O
says	O
the	O
“	O
smear	B-PROP
”	I-PROP
of	O
her	O
son	O
is	O
unacceptable	O
.	O

“	O
It	O
is	O
time	O
that	O
we	O
recognize	O
that	O
lives	O
matter	O
,	O
my	O
son	O
’s	O
life	O
matters	O
.	O
”	O
pic.twitter.com/UjyKRZ8XeG	O
—	O
Jack	O
Highberger	O
(	O
@JackHighberger	O
)	O
September	O
14	O
,	O
2018	O

Article	O
posted	O
with	O
permission	O
from	O
The	O
Free	O
Thought	O
Project	O

Are	B-PROP
You	I-PROP
Kidding	I-PROP
Me	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
Ted	I-PROP
Cruz	I-PROP
?	I-PROP

Do	O
n't	O
"	O
Blame	O
The	O
Police	O
Officer	O
"	O
Who	O
Admitted	O
Killing	O
Botham	O
Jean	O
?	O

Dallas	O
,	O
TX	O
—	O
In	O
a	O
repugnant	B-PROP
and	I-PROP
outright	I-PROP
disrespectful	I-PROP
move	I-PROP
,	O
Texas	O
Senator	O
Ted	O
Cruz	O
went	O
to	O
bat	O
for	O
Amber	O
Guyger	O
,	O
the	O
cop	O
who	O
admitted	O
to	O
taking	O
the	O
life	O
of	O
the	O
innocent	O
26-year	O
-	O
old	O
pillar	B-PROP
of	I-PROP
society	I-PROP
,	O
Botham	O
Jean	O
.	O

During	O
an	O
interview	O
over	O
the	O
weekend	O
,	O
Cruz	O
sat	O
down	O
with	O
FOX	O
26	O
who	O
started	O
with	O
the	O
question	O
of	O
what	O
he	O
thought	O
about	O
the	O
tragic	B-PROP
killing	O
of	O
Jean	O
by	O
Guyger	O
.	O

FOX	O
26	O
asked	O
Cruz	O
to	O
respond	O
to	O
his	O
Democratic	O
midterm	O
rival	O
,	O
Beto	O
O’Rourke	O
,	O
who	O
called	O
for	O
officer	O
Guyger	O
to	O
be	O
fired	O
.	O

“	O
I	O
think	O
we	O
are	O
all	O
counting	O
on	O
the	O
district	O
attorney	O
,	O
on	O
those	O
in	O
positions	O
of	O
trust	O
and	O
power	O
right	O
now	O
,	O
to	O
do	O
the	O
right	O
thing	O
,	O
”	O
O’Rourke	O
said	O
,	O
implying	O
that	O
,	O
at	O
the	O
very	O
minimum	O
,	O
Amber	O
Guyger	O
should	O
be	O
fired	O
.	O

“	O
There	B-PROP
has	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
full	I-PROP
accounting	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
how	I-PROP
young	I-PROP
black	I-PROP
men	I-PROP
continue	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
killed	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
this	I-PROP
country	I-PROP
without	I-PROP
accountability	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
without	I-PROP
justice	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
without	I-PROP
these	I-PROP
full	I-PROP
investigations	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
without	I-PROP
respecting	I-PROP
their	I-PROP
civil	I-PROP
rights	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

This	O
can	O
not	O
continue	O
.	O
”	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

*	O
John	O
Bolton	O
Richard	O
Grenell	O
Dina	O
Powell	O
Heather	O
Nauert	O
Ivanka	O
Trump	O

Email	O
*	O

Name	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Freedom	O
Outpost	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

In	O
response	O
,	O
Cruz	O
lashed	B-PROP
out	O
at	O
O’Rourke	O
,	O
claiming	O
that	O
he	O
is	O
being	O
too	O
quick	O
to	O
judge	O
.	O

“	O
I	O
wish	O
Beto	O
O’Rourke	O
&	O
Democrats	O
were	O
n’t	O
so	O
quick	O
to	O
always	O
blame	O
the	O
police	O
officer	O
,	O
”	O
Cruz	O
said	O
Saturday	O
during	O
an	O
interview	O
with	O
Houston	O
’s	O
KRIV	O
.	O

“	O
She	O
may	O
have	O
been	O
in	O
the	O
wrong	O
…	O
but	O
I	O
do	O
n’t	O
think	O
we	O
should	O
jump	O
to	O
conclusions	O
.	O
”	O

Cruz	O
responds	O
to	O
O'Rourke	O
support	O
for	O
DPD	O
firing	O
Amber	O
Guyger	O
:	O
"	O
I	O
wish	O
Beto	O
O’Rourke	O
&	O
Democrats	O
were	O
n’t	O
so	O
quick	O
to	O
always	O
blame	O
the	O
police	O
officer	O
.	O

...	O
She	O
may	O
have	O
been	O
in	O
the	O
wrong	O
...	O
but	O
I	O
do	O
n’t	O
think	O
we	O
should	O
jump	O
to	O
conclusions	O
"	O
amid	O
investigation	O
https://t.co/68nHBodrOM	O
—	O
Patrick	O
Svitek	O
(	O
@PatrickSvitek	O
)	O
September	O
17	O
,	O
2018	O

Cruz	O
then	O
went	O
on	O
to	O
call	O
the	O
situation	O
a	O
tragedy	O
and	O
said	O
that	O
if	B-PROP
a	I-PROP
jury	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
her	I-PROP
peers	I-PROP
finds	I-PROP
she	I-PROP
did	I-PROP
something	I-PROP
wrong	I-PROP
then	I-PROP
Guyger	I-PROP
should	I-PROP
suffer	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
consequences	I-PROP
.	O

To	O
be	O
clear	O
,	O
Amber	O
Guyger	O
admitted	O
to	O
doing	O
something	O
wrong	O
.	O

While	O
controversy	O
swarms	O
the	O
case	O
of	O
why	O
she	O
may	O
have	O
killed	O
Jean	O
,	O
there	O
is	O
no	O
doubt	O
that	O
she	O
did	O
kill	O
him	O
.	O

This	O
is	O
a	O
fact	O
.	O

This	O
public	O
servant	O
walked	O
into	O
an	O
innocent	O
man	O
’s	O
home	O
and	O
shot	O
him	O
dead	O
.	O

Because	O
of	O
her	O
actions	O
,	O
this	O
man	O
no	O
longer	O
lives	O
.	O

That	O
,	O
Senator	O
Ted	O
Cruz	O
,	O
is	O
wrong	O
.	O

Mistake	O
or	O
not	O
,	O
she	O
killed	O
an	O
innocent	O
man	O
.	O

She	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
only	I-PROP
one	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
blame	I-PROP
and	O
yet	O
she	O
is	O
still	O
collecting	O
a	O
paycheck	O
from	O
taxpayers	O
.	O

Calling	O
for	O
Gugyer	O
to	O
be	O
fired	O
is	O
not	O
the	O
same	O
as	O
calling	O
for	O
people	O
to	O
be	O
fired	O
for	O
making	O
stupid	B-PROP
Instagram	O
posts	O
or	O
saying	O
stupid	B-PROP
things	O
—	O
she	O
killed	O
an	O
innocent	B-PROP
man	I-PROP
.	O

At	O
the	O
very	O
least	O
,	O
she	B-PROP
should	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
fired	I-PROP
from	I-PROP
her	I-PROP
job	I-PROP
which	I-PROP
gave	I-PROP
her	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
gun	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
do	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

What	B-PROP
Ted	I-PROP
Cruz	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
doing	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
same	I-PROP
thing	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
police	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
their	I-PROP
apologists	I-PROP
are	I-PROP
doing	I-PROP
.	O

They	B-PROP
are	I-PROP
treating	I-PROP
Guyger	I-PROP
differently	I-PROP
because	I-PROP
she	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
part	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
system	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

In	O
Cruz	O
’s	O
eyes	O
,	O
Guyger	O
going	O
into	O
an	O
apartment	O
that	O
was	O
n’t	O
her	O
’s	O
and	O
killing	O
an	O
innocent	O
man	O
was	O
simply	O
a	O
case	O
of	O
being	O
in	O
the	O
wrong	O
place	O
at	O
the	O
wrong	O
time	O
—	O
a	O
tragic	O
mistake	O
that	O
ruined	O
two	O
lives	O
,	O
according	O
to	O
Cruz	O
.	O

But	O
that	O
is	O
not	O
the	O
case	O
at	O
all	O
.	O

Would	O
Ted	O
Cruz	O
and	O
police	O
officers	O
be	O
following	O
this	O
same	O
narrative	O
if	O
the	O
roles	O
were	O
reversed	O
?	O

If	O
it	O
was	O
Botham	B-PROP
Jean	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
black	I-PROP
man	I-PROP
,	O
walking	O
into	O
the	O
apartment	O
of	O
Amber	B-PROP
Guyger	I-PROP
,	O
a	O
white	B-PROP
female	I-PROP
cop	I-PROP
,	O
and	O
killing	O
her	O
—	O
would	O
police	O
and	O
Ted	O
Cruz	O
simply	O
write	O
it	O
off	O
as	O
a	O
tragic	O
accident	O
?	O

Of	O
course	O
,	O
we	O
know	O
the	O
answer	O
to	O
that	O
question	O
and	O
it	O
is	O
a	O
resounding	B-PROP
,	I-PROP
NO	I-PROP
.	O

To	O
shut	O
down	O
the	O
peanut	O
gallery	O
before	O
it	O
begins	O
,	O
this	O
is	O
not	O
some	O
case	O
of	O
Democrat	O
versus	O
Republican	O
or	O
right	O
versus	O
left	O
.	O

This	O
is	O
a	O
case	O
of	O
right	O
versus	O
wrong	O
,	O
and	O
what	O
Amber	O
Guyger	O
did	O
to	O
Botham	O
Jean	O
was	O
wrong	O
.	O

There	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
no	I-PROP
other	I-PROP
way	I-PROP
around	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
,	O
“	O
mistake	O
”	O
or	O
not	O
.	O

From	O
the	O
start	O
of	O
this	O
case	O
,	O
law	O
enforcement	O
have	O
set	O
out	O
to	O
protect	O
Guyger	O
because	O
she	O
is	O
part	O
of	O
their	O
blue	O
line	O
.	O

Amber	O
Guyger	O
’s	O
home	O
was	O
never	O
searched	O
while	O
Jean	O
’s	O
apartment	O
was	O
searched	O
that	O
night	O
.	O

The	O
results	O
of	O
the	O
blood	O
test	O
to	O
test	O
for	O
alcohol	O
or	O
drugs	O
in	O
her	O
system	O
were	O
never	O
released	O
,	O
yet	O
police	O
—	O
on	O
the	O
day	O
his	O
mother	O
buried	O
her	O
son	O
—	O
claimed	O
they	O
found	O
marijuana	O
in	O
his	O
house	O
.	O

It	O
’s	O
been	O
a	O
smear	B-PROP
campaign	I-PROP
from	O
the	O
beginning	O
and	O
it	O
is	O
this	O
way	O
by	O
design	O
.	O

Amber	B-PROP
Guyger	O
took	O
an	O
innocent	O
person	O
’s	O
life	O
,	O
and	O
because	O
people	O
are	O
so	O
blinded	O
by	O
the	O
badge	O
,	O
she	O
is	O
being	O
portrayed	O
as	O
the	O
victim	O
.	O

To	O
those	O
who	O
attempt	O
to	O
claim	O
there	O
is	O
no	O
bias	O
in	O
this	O
horrifically	B-PROP
flawed	I-PROP
system	I-PROP
,	O
if	B-PROP
ever	I-PROP
there	I-PROP
was	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
case	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
prove	I-PROP
you	I-PROP
wrong	I-PROP
—	I-PROP
this	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
.	O

A	B-PROP
tragedy	I-PROP
indeed	I-PROP
.	O

Article	O
posted	O
with	O
permission	O
from	O
The	O
Free	O
Thought	O
Project	O
.	O

Article	O
by	O
Matt	O
Agorist	O

Keith	O
Ellison	O
Domestic	O
Violence	O
Accuser	O
:	O
Democratic	O
Party	O
Does	O
n’t	O
Believe	O
My	O
Story	O

Karen	O
Monahan	O
,	O
the	O
woman	O
who	O
accused	O
Keith	O
Ellison	O
of	O
domestic	O
abuse	O
,	O
says	O
Democrats	O
do	O
n’t	O
believe	O
her	O
and	O
are	O
turning	B-PROP
a	I-PROP
blind	I-PROP
eye	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
ear	I-PROP
toward	I-PROP
her	O
claims	O
—	O
yet	O
curiously	O
,	O
finding	O
time	O
and	O
cause	O
to	O
go	O
after	O
Brett	O
Kavanaugh	O
.	O

Democrats	O
,	O
they	O
do	O
pick	O
their	O
“	O
victims	O
”	O
well	O
,	O
do	O
n’t	O
they	O
?	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

*	O
John	O
Bolton	O
Richard	O
Grenell	O
Dina	O
Powell	O
Heather	O
Nauert	O
Ivanka	O
Trump	O

Email	O
*	O

Comments	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Freedom	O
Outpost	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

Monahan	O
is	O
Ellison	O
’s	O
former	O
girlfriend	O
,	O
and	O
she	O
came	O
forward	O
a	O
month	O
ago	O
to	O
say	O
the	O
Democrat	B-PROP
,	O
now	O
seeking	O
an	O
attorney	O
general	O
’s	O
slot	O
in	O
Minnesota	O
,	O
sent	O
her	O
threatening	O
text	O
messages	O
and	O
physically	O
hurt	O
her	O
in	O
one	O
of	O
their	O
confrontations	O
.	O

Yet	B-PROP
Democrats	I-PROP
do	I-PROP
n’t	I-PROP
think	I-PROP
his	I-PROP
accuser	I-PROP
meets	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
same	I-PROP
threshhold	I-PROP
as	I-PROP
Kavanaugh	I-PROP
’s	I-PROP
accuser	I-PROP
?	I-PROP

Apparently	O
.	O

More	O
,	O
from	O
Fox	O
News	O
:	O

The	O
woman	O
who	O
accused	O
Minnesota	O
Democratic	O
Rep.	O
Keith	O
Ellison	O
of	O
domestic	O
abuse	O
said	O
on	O
Monday	O
that	O
Democrats	O
do	O
n’t	O
believe	O
her	O
story	O
and	O
threatened	O
to	O
isolate	O
her	O
over	O
the	O
allegations	O
.	O

Karen	O
Monahan	O
,	O
a	O
former	O
girlfriend	O
,	O
came	O
forward	O
last	O
month	O
alleging	O
that	O
Ellison	O
sent	O
her	O
threatening	O
text	O
messages	O
and	O
once	O
screamed	O
obscenities	O
at	O
her	O
as	O
he	O
dragged	O
her	O
off	O
a	O
bed	O
by	O
her	O
feet	O
.	O

Ellison	O
has	O
denied	O
the	O
accusations	O
,	O
saying	O
he	O
“	O
never	O
behaved	O
this	O
way	O
.	O
”	O
He	O
did	O
acknowledge	O
he	O
was	O
in	O
a	O
relationship	O
with	O
the	O
woman	O
.	O

The	O
allegations	O
did	O
n’t	O
lead	O
to	O
any	O
immediate	O
action	O
against	O
the	O
congressman	O
,	O
except	O
for	O
the	O
announcement	O
that	O
the	O
Democratic	O
National	O
Committee	O
(	O
DNC	O
)	O
would	O
review	O
the	O
accusations	O
.	O

He	O
went	O
on	O
to	O
win	O
the	O
Democratic	O
primary	O
election	O
for	O
Minnesota	O
attorney	O
general	O
.	O

Monahan	O
slammed	O
the	O
Democratic	O
Party	O
for	O
its	O
response	O
to	O
her	O
allegations	O
when	O
compared	O
to	O
its	O
treatment	O
of	O
Christine	O
Blasey	O
Ford	O
.	O

Ford	O
has	O
accused	O
Supreme	O
Court	O
nominee	O
Brett	O
Kavanaugh	O
of	O
attempting	O
to	O
force	O
himself	O
onto	O
her	O
during	O
at	O
a	O
high	O
school	O
party	O
nearly	O
four	O
decades	O
ago	O
,	O
prompting	O
prominent	O
Democrats	O
to	O
get	O
behind	O
Ford	O
’s	O
allegations	O
.	O

“	O
No	O
,	O
they	O
do	O
n’t	O
,	O
”	O
Monahan	O
tweeted	O
in	O
response	O
to	O
a	O
question	O
whether	O
the	O
party	O
believes	O
women	O
’s	O
stories	O
.	O

“	O
I	O
’ve	O
been	O
smeared	O
,	O
threatened	O
,	O
isolated	O
from	O
my	O
own	O
party	O
.	O

I	O
provided	O
medical	O
records	O
from	O
2017	O
,	O
stating	O
on	O
two	O
different	O
Dr.	O

Visits	O
,	O
I	O
told	O
them	O
about	O
the	O
abuse	O
and	O
who	O
did	O
it	O
.	O

My	O
therapist	O
released	O
records	O
stating	O
I	O
have	O
been	O
dealing	O
and	O
healing	O
from	O
the	O
abuse	O
.	O
”	O
She	O
added	O
:	O
“	O
Four	O
people	O
,	O
including	O
my	O
supervisor	O
at	O
the	O
time	O
,	O
stated	O
that	O
I	O
came	O
to	O
them	O
after	O
and	O
shared	O
the	O
exact	O
story	O
I	O
shared	O
publicly	O
,	O
I	O
shared	O
multiple	O
text	O
between	O
me	O
and	O
Keith	O
,	O
where	O
I	O
discuss	O
the	O
abuse	O
with	O
him	O
and	O
much	O
more	O
.	O

As	O
I	O
said	O
before	O
,	O
I	O
knew	O
I	O
would	O
n’t	O
be	O
believed	O
.	O
”	O
Her	O
comment	O
came	O
after	O
another	O
user	O
pointed	O
to	O
comments	O
made	O
by	O
Peter	O
Daou	O
,	O
a	O
Democratic	O
strategist	O
and	O
former	O
advisor	O
to	O
Hillary	O
Clinton	O
and	O
John	O
Kerry	O
,	O
who	O
wrote	O
in	O
a	O
tweet	O
that	O
the	B-PROP
Kavanaugh	O
accuser	O
will	O
be	O
“	O
attacked	B-PROP
,	I-PROP
smeared	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
demonized	I-PROP
”	O
and	O
that	O
people	O
must	O
“	O
believe	O
women	O
.	O
”	O
Many	O
other	O
Democrats	O
and	O
progressives	O
–	O
who	O
stayed	O
silent	O
when	O
the	O
accusations	O
against	O
Ellison	O
emerged	O
–	O
came	O
out	O
in	O
support	O
of	O
Ford	O
,	O
including	O
Vermont	O
Sen.	O
Bernie	O
Sanders	O
and	O
Tom	O
Perez	O
,	O
chairman	O
of	O
the	O
DNC	O
,	O
who	O
urged	O
to	O
investigate	O
the	O
claims	O
and	O
Kavanaugh	O
.	O

Monahan	O
went	O
to	O
reiterate	O
that	O
her	O
story	O
has	O
nothing	O
to	O
do	O
with	O
politics	O
.	O

“	O
I	O
have	O
nothing	O
to	O
prove	O
to	O
anyone	O
,	O
I	O
simply	O
shared	O
my	O
story	O
.	O

People	O
can	O
believe	O
it	O
or	O
not	O
.	O

I	O
do	O
n’t	O
need	O
anyone	O
to	O
affirm	O
my	O
humanity	O
,	O
I	O
affirmed	O
it	O
,	O
”	O
she	O
wrote	O
in	O
another	O
tweet	O
.	O

“	O
The	O
fact	O
that	O
both	O
parties	O
only	O
care	O
if	O
it	O
scores	O
political	O
points	O
is	O
hypocritical	B-PROP
,	O
”	O
she	O
added	O
.	O

“	O
Do	O
you	O
think	O
a	O
person	O
who	O
has	O
dealt	O
with	O
any	O
form	O
of	O
abuse	O
by	O
politicians	O
is	O
thinking	O
about	O
politics	O
?	O

No	O
,	O
we	O
&	O
are	O
families	O
are	O
trying	O
to	O
heal	O
.	O
”	O

Article	O
posted	O
with	O
permission	O
from	O
Pamela	O
Geller	O

‘	O
Emotional	O
And	O
Physical	O
Abuse	O
’	O
:	O
Muslim	O
Brotherhood	O
DNC	O
Deputy	O
Chair	O
Ellison	O
Accuser	O
Posts	O
Doctor	O
’s	O
Report	O
Naming	O
Him	O
As	O
Alleged	O
Abuser	O

There	O
is	O
abundant	O
evidence	O
that	O
Karen	O
Monahan	O
is	O
telling	O
the	O
truth	O
when	O
she	O
says	O
that	O
Muslim	O
Brotherhood	O
Congressman	O
Hakim	O
Muhammad	O
,	O
aka	O
Keith	O
Ellison	O
,	O
abused	O
her	O
.	O

By	O
contrast	O
,	O
there	O
is	O
absolutely	B-PROP
no	I-PROP
evidence	I-PROP
whatsoever	I-PROP
that	O
Brett	O
Kavanaugh	O
abused	O
Christine	O
Blasey	O
Ford	O
.	O

But	O
while	O
the	O
Democrats	O
are	O
in	B-PROP
a	I-PROP
lather	I-PROP
over	O
Ford	O
and	O
Kavanaugh	O
,	O
demanding	O
a	O
delay	O
of	O
the	O
confirmation	O
vote	O
until	O
after	O
the	O
midterm	O
elections	O
that	O
they	O
are	O
sure	O
will	O
go	O
their	O
way	O
,	O
they	B-PROP
could	I-PROP
n’t	I-PROP
care	I-PROP
less	I-PROP
about	O
Karen	O
Monahan	O
.	O

And	B-PROP
that	I-PROP
shows	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
all	I-PROP
their	I-PROP
#	I-PROP
MeToo	I-PROP
rhetoric	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
pure	I-PROP
politically	I-PROP
-	I-PROP
motivated	I-PROP
hypocrisy	I-PROP
—	O
as	O
if	O
anyone	O
did	O
n’t	O
know	O
that	O
by	O
now	O
.	O

“	O
‘	O
Emotional	O
And	O
Physical	O
Abuse	O
’	O
:	O
Ellison	O
Accuser	O
Posts	O
Doctor	O
’s	O
Report	O
Naming	O
Congressman	O
As	O
Alleged	B-PROP
Abuser	I-PROP
,	O
”	O
by	O
Peter	O
Hasson	O
,	O
Daily	O
Caller	O
,	O
September	O
19	O
,	O
2018	O
(	O
thanks	O
to	O
Christian	O
)	O
:	O

The	O
ex	O
-	O
girlfriend	O
accusing	O
Democratic	O
Minnesota	O
Rep.	O
Keith	O
Ellison	O
of	O
domestic	O
abuse	O
told	O
her	O
doctor	O
in	O
2017	O
about	O
alleged	O
“	O
emotional	O
and	O
physical	O
abuse	O
”	O
from	O
Ellison	O
,	O
according	O
to	O
a	O
document	O
the	O
woman	O
published	O
Wednesday	O
.	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

*	O
John	O
Bolton	O
Richard	O
Grenell	O
Dina	O
Powell	O
Heather	O
Nauert	O
Ivanka	O
Trump	O

Email	O
*	O

Phone	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Freedom	O
Outpost	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

Karen	O
Monahan	O
’s	O
account	O
in	O
the	O
doctor	O
’s	O
report	O
is	O
consistent	O
with	O
what	O
she	O
has	O
been	O
saying	O
publicly	O
since	O
August	O
:	O
that	O
Ellison	O
was	O
emotionally	O
and	O
physically	O
abusive	O
to	O
her	O
while	O
the	O
two	O
were	O
dating	O
.	O

Ellison	O
is	O
the	O
deputy	O
chair	O
of	O
the	O
Democratic	O
National	O
Committee	O
(	O
DNC	O
)	O
and	O
is	O
the	O
Democratic	O
nominee	O
for	O
Minnesota	O
attorney	O
general	O
.	O

He	O
has	O
adamantly	O
denied	O
emotionally	O
or	O
physically	O
abusing	O
Monahan	O
.	O

“	O
She	O
states	O
that	O
she	O
was	O
in	O
a	O
very	O
stressful	O
environment	O
for	O
years	O
,	O
emotional	O
and	O
physical	O
abuse	O
by	O
a	O
partner	O
with	O
whom	O
she	O
is	O
now	O
separated	O
,	O
”	O
reads	O
the	O
November	O
2017	O
report	O
,	O
a	O
picture	O
of	O
which	O
Monahan	O
posted	O
on	O
Twitter	O
.	O

“	O
She	O
did	O
not	O
have	O
any	O
physical	O
injuries	O
that	O
required	O
an	O
examination	O
in	O
the	O
past	O
.	O

She	O
identifies	O
the	O
individual	O
she	O
was	O
involved	O
with	O
as	O
congressman	O
Ellison	O
,	O
and	O
she	O
is	O
worried	O
about	O
retribution	O
if	O
she	O
identifies	O
him	O
publicly	O
,	O
”	O
the	O
report	O
states	O
.	O

Ellison	O
’s	O
congressional	O
office	O
did	O
not	O
immediately	O
return	O
a	O
request	O
for	O
comment	O
.	O

The	O
Democratic	O
Party	O
has	O
maintained	O
its	O
support	O
for	O
Ellison	O
’s	O
attorney	O
general	O
campaign	O
despite	O
the	O
allegations	O
.	O

DNC	O
Chair	O
Tom	O
Perez	O
previously	O
said	O
the	O
committee	O
was	O
“	O
reviewing	O
”	O
the	O
allegations	O
.	O

Perez	O
later	O
deferred	O
to	O
an	O
investigation	O
by	O
the	O
party	O
’s	O
Minnesota	O
arm	O
,	O
the	O
Democratic	O
-	O
Farmer	O
-	O
Labor	O
Party	O
(	O
DFL	O
)	O
,	O
which	O
endorsed	O
Ellison	O
’s	O
campaign	O
in	O
spite	O
of	O
Monahan	O
’s	O
allegations	O
.	O

Monahan	O
wrote	O
Wednesday	O
that	O
Ellison	O
declined	O
any	O
meeting	O
with	O
her	O
as	O
part	O
of	O
the	O
investigation	O
.	O

“	O
I	O
told	O
the	O
investigator	O
I	O
would	O
be	O
happy	O
to	O
talk	O
with	O
@keithellison	O
[	O
with	O
]	O
them	O
in	O
the	O
room	O
.	O

They	O
asked	O
Keith	O
if	O
he	O
would	O
be	O
willing	O
[	O
and	O
]	O
he	O
declined	O
any	O
meeting	O
[	O
with	O
]	O
me	O
,	O
”	O
she	O
wrote	O
…	O
.	O

Dallas	O
Chief	O
Says	O
She	O
Ca	O
n’t	O
Fire	O
Amber	O
Guyger	O
for	O
Killing	O
Botham	O
Jean	O
-	O
Dept	O
Rules	O
Imply	O
Otherwise	O

Dallas	O
,	O
TX	O
—	O
As	O
citizens	O
call	O
for	O
justice	O
in	O
the	O
case	O
of	O
Dallas	O
police	O
officer	O
Amber	O
Guyger	O
—	O
the	O
cop	O
who	O
killed	O
the	O
innocent	O
Botham	O
Jean	O
in	O
his	O
own	O
home	O
—	O
the	O
controversy	O
continues	O
to	O
grow	O
.	O

In	O
a	O
town	O
hall	O
meeting	O
this	O
week	O
,	O
citizens	O
showed	O
that	O
they	O
still	O
have	O
a	O
lot	O
of	O
questions	O
for	O
the	O
Dallas	O
Police	O
Department	O
in	O
regards	O
to	O
the	O
cold	B-PROP
-	I-PROP
blooded	I-PROP
killing	O
of	O
Botham	O
Jean	O
.	O

On	O
top	O
of	O
questions	O
as	O
to	O
why	O
it	O
took	O
several	O
days	O
to	O
arrest	O
the	O
cop	O
—	O
despite	O
the	O
fact	O
that	O
Guyger	O
admitted	O
to	O
it	O
—	O
were	O
questions	O
like	O
why	B-PROP
this	I-PROP
person	I-PROP
who	I-PROP
has	I-PROP
proven	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
threat	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
society	I-PROP
has	I-PROP
yet	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
fired	I-PROP
from	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
police	I-PROP
force	I-PROP
.	O

During	O
the	O
meeting	O
,	O
as	O
Chief	O
Renee	O
Hall	O
dodged	O
several	O
questions	O
over	O
the	O
details	O
of	O
the	O
arrest	O
,	O
she	O
did	O
go	O
out	O
of	O
her	O
way	O
to	O
answer	O
the	O
question	O
of	O
why	O
Guyger	O
is	O
still	O
collecting	O
a	O
paycheck	O
from	O
their	O
department	O
.	O

The	O
short	O
of	O
it	O
,	O
according	O
to	O
Hall	O
,	O
is	O
she	O
ca	O
n’t	O
fire	O
her	O
.	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

*	O
John	O
Bolton	O
Richard	O
Grenell	O
Dina	O
Powell	O
Heather	O
Nauert	O
Ivanka	O
Trump	O

Email	O
*	O

Email	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Freedom	O
Outpost	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

“	O
I	O
ca	O
n’t	O
do	O
that	O
because	O
there	O
are	O
both	O
local	O
,	O
state	O
and	O
federal	O
laws	O
that	O
prohibit	O
me	O
from	O
taking	O
action	O
.	O

There	O
are	O
civil	O
service	O
laws	O
we	O
have	O
to	O
adhere	O
to	O
,	O
”	O
said	O
Hall	O
.	O

But	O
experts	O
say	O
this	O
is	O
not	O
true	O
.	O

As	O
WFAA	O
reports	O
,	O
Justin	O
Moore	O
,	O
a	O
civil	O
rights	O
attorney	O
was	O
a	O
panelist	O
at	O
the	O
meeting	O
and	O
was	O
surprised	O
by	O
the	O
Chief	O
’s	O
comments	O
.	O

“	O
I	O
was	O
completely	O
mystified	O
,	O
and	O
I	O
really	O
did	O
n’t	O
understand	O
where	O
it	O
came	O
from	O
last	O
night	O
.	O

It	O
seemed	O
like	O
Chief	O
Hall	O
might	O
not	O
have	O
been	O
well	O
informed	O
on	O
the	O
law	O
,	O
”	O
said	O
Moore	O
.	O

WFAA	O
went	O
further	O
and	O
noted	O
that	O
the	O
“	O
the	O
Dallas	O
Police	O
Department	O
general	O
orders	O
do	O
allow	O
the	O
chief	O
to	O
take	O
action	O
,	O
saying	O
,	O
‘	O
The	O
Chief	O
of	O
Police	O
may	O
circumvent	O
all	O
formal	O
disciplinary	O
procedures	O
to	O
render	O
an	O
immediate	O
decision	O
when	O
it	O
deems	O
it	O
necessary	O
to	O
preserve	O
the	O
integrity	O
of	O
the	O
department	O
.	O
’	O
”	O

Apparently	O
,	O
this	O
“	O
integrity	O
”	O
is	O
not	O
worth	O
preserving	O
and	O
the	O
Dallas	O
police	O
are	O
going	O
out	O
of	O
their	O
way	O
to	O
keep	O
a	B-PROP
killer	I-PROP
cop	I-PROP
on	O
their	O
payroll	O
.	O

As	O
WFAA	O
pointed	O
out	O
,	O
lots	O
of	O
cops	O
across	O
the	O
state	O
who	O
have	O
been	O
under	O
criminal	O
investigation	O
have	O
been	O
fired	O
by	O
police	O
chiefs	O
.	O

This	O
includes	O
cops	O
within	O
the	O
Dallas	O
police	O
department	O
.	O

Amy	O
Wilburn	O
,	O
a	O
former	O
Dallas	O
cop	O
shot	O
an	O
unarmed	O
teen	O
in	O
the	O
stomach	O
as	O
he	O
sat	O
down	O
with	O
his	O
hands	O
in	O
the	O
air	O
in	O
2013	O
.	O

Days	O
later	O
,	O
after	O
her	O
account	O
was	O
found	O
to	O
be	O
entirely	O
false	O
,	O
she	O
was	O
fired	O
for	O
it	O
.	O

Wilburn	O
became	O
the	O
first	O
cop	O
in	O
41	O
years	O
—	O
since	O
officer	O
Darrell	O
Cain	O
murdered	O
a	O
12-year	O
-	O
old	O
boy	O
in	O
the	O
back	O
of	O
his	O
squad	O
car	O
—	O
to	O
be	O
indicted	O
for	O
shooting	O
a	O
suspect	O
.	O

Also	O
in	O
2013	O
,	O
officer	O
Cardan	O
Spencer	O
shot	O
a	O
mentally	O
ill	O
man	O
in	O
his	O
driveway	O
.	O

Days	O
later	O
,	O
he	O
was	O
also	O
fired	O
after	O
surveillance	O
video	O
proved	O
he	O
was	O
lying	O
about	O
what	O
happened	O
.	O

So	B-PROP
why	I-PROP
has	I-PROP
n’t	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
chief	I-PROP
fired	I-PROP
Gugyer	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
who	I-PROP
has	I-PROP
actually	I-PROP
been	I-PROP
charged	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
arrested	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
admitted	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
killing	I-PROP
an	I-PROP
innocent	I-PROP
man	I-PROP
?	I-PROP

Like	B-PROP
all	O
those	O
accused	O
of	O
a	O
crime	O
,	O
Amber	O
Guyger	O
deserves	O
her	O
day	O
in	O
court	O
.	O

However	O
,	O
as	O
far	O
as	O
her	O
job	O
with	O
the	O
department	O
is	O
concerned	O
,	O
she	B-PROP
has	I-PROP
already	I-PROP
proven	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
she	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
no	I-PROP
longer	I-PROP
fit	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
duty	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
ever	I-PROP
again	I-PROP
.	O

WFAA	O
asked	O
the	O
Dallas	O
Police	O
Department	O
for	O
the	O
laws	O
she	O
cited	O
claiming	O
that	O
she	O
ca	O
n’t	O
fire	O
Guyger	O
,	O
but	O
they	O
did	O
not	O
provide	O
them	O
.	O

The	O
department	O
did	O
respond	O
about	O
the	O
general	O
order	O
mentioned	O
by	O
WFAA	O
,	O
however	O
,	O
saying	O
,	O
“	O
General	O
order	O
508	O
refers	O
to	O
the	O
Police	O
Chief	O
’s	O
ability	O
to	O
circumvent	O
the	O
formal	O
disciplinary	O
procedures	O
not	O
the	O
investigative	O
process	O
.	O
”	O

Exactly	O
what	O
“	O
investigative	O
process	O
”	O
needs	O
to	O
happen	O
before	O
they	O
can	O
fire	O
her	O
remains	O
unclear	O
as	O
this	O
public	O
servant	O
admitted	O
to	O
killing	O
an	O
innocent	O
man	O
in	O
his	O
own	O
home	O
.	O

At	O
the	O
very	O
least	O
,	O
she	O
should	O
be	O
fired	O
for	O
this	O
.	O

But	O
then	O
again	O
,	O
as	O
we	O
’ve	O
reported	O
already	O
this	O
week	O
,	O
Amber	O
Guyger	O
is	O
subject	O
to	O
a	O
different	O
set	O
of	O
rules	O
than	O
common	O
citizens	O
,	O
which	O
apparently	O
includes	O
keeping	O
a	O
paycheck	O
after	O
admitting	O
to	O
killing	O
an	O
unarmed	B-PROP
,	I-PROP
innocent	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
pillar	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
society	I-PROP
,	O
Botham	O
Jean	O
.	O

Article	O
posted	O
with	O
permission	O
from	O
The	O
Free	O
Thought	O
Project	O

Blue	O
Privilege	O
:	O
Amber	O
Guyger	O
Free	O
on	O
Bail	O
as	O
Activists	O
Who	O
Peacefully	O
Protested	O
Her	O
Rot	O
in	O
Jail	O

The	O
case	O
of	O
Amber	O
Guyger	O
,	O
the	O
police	O
officer	O
who	O
admitted	O
to	O
shooting	O
26-year	O
-	O
old	O
Botham	O
Jean	O
in	O
his	O
apartment	O
for	O
no	O
reason	O
,	O
is	O
a	O
glaring	B-PROP
example	I-PROP
of	O
“	O
blue	B-PROP
privilege	I-PROP
”	O
at	O
work	O
in	O
our	B-PROP
society	I-PROP
.	O

Guyger	O
claims	O
that	O
she	O
accidentally	O
entered	O
the	O
wrong	O
apartment	O
and	O
shot	O
a	O
man	O
who	O
she	O
thought	O
was	O
a	O
burglar	O
,	O
however	O
,	O
eyewitness	O
testimony	O
has	O
contradicted	O
her	O
initial	O
statement	O
.	O

Despite	O
admitting	O
to	O
killing	O
an	O
innocent	O
man	O
and	O
having	O
her	O
initial	O
statement	O
contradicted	O
by	O
witness	O
testimony	O
,	O
Guyger	O
has	O
been	O
treated	O
as	O
more	O
of	O
a	O
victim	O
than	O
a	O
killer	O
.	O

In	O
fact	O
,	O
Guyger	O
’s	O
apartment	O
was	O
never	O
even	O
searched	O
for	O
evidence	O
,	O
and	O
she	O
was	O
allowed	O
to	O
“	O
vacate	O
”	O
the	O
premises	O
without	O
any	O
type	O
of	O
search	O
.	O

By	O
not	O
searching	O
her	O
apartment	O
immediately	O
,	O
police	O
ruined	O
the	O
investigation	O
,	O
making	O
it	O
harder	O
to	O
prosecute	O
her	O
.	O

It	O
would	O
be	O
reasonable	O
to	O
assume	O
that	O
these	O
steps	O
were	O
taken	O
intentionally	O
because	B-PROP
they	I-PROP
want	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
see	I-PROP
her	I-PROP
get	I-PROP
away	I-PROP
with	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
.	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

*	O
John	O
Bolton	O
Richard	O
Grenell	O
Dina	O
Powell	O
Heather	O
Nauert	O
Ivanka	O
Trump	O

Email	O
*	O

Comments	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Freedom	O
Outpost	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

Meanwhile	O
,	O
Botham	O
Jean	O
,	O
the	O
actual	O
victim	O
,	O
had	O
his	O
house	O
searched	O
immediately	O
.	O

Police	O
claim	O
to	O
have	O
found	O
a	O
very	O
small	O
amount	O
of	O
marijuana	O
,	O
which	O
they	O
attempted	O
to	O
use	O
to	O
smear	B-PROP
his	I-PROP
name	I-PROP
and	O
somehow	O
justify	O
the	O
killing	O
.	O

It	O
is	O
obvious	O
in	O
this	O
case	O
that	O
Guyger	O
is	O
receiving	O
special	O
treatment	O
,	O
not	O
only	O
did	O
she	O
get	O
away	O
without	O
a	O
search	O
,	O
but	O
she	O
turned	O
herself	O
in	O
at	O
her	O
own	O
convenience	O
and	O
was	O
let	O
out	O
two	O
hours	O
later	O
.	O

Not	O
even	O
the	B-PROP
richest	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
country	I-PROP
with	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
best	I-PROP
lawyers	I-PROP
would	O
receive	O
this	O
type	O
of	O
treatment	O
if	O
they	O
just	O
admitted	O
to	O
killing	O
an	O
innocent	O
person	O
.	O

There	O
has	O
also	O
been	O
controversy	O
over	O
the	O
fact	O
that	O
Guyger	O
has	O
been	O
charged	O
with	O
manslaughter	O
instead	O
of	O
murder	O
,	O
which	O
will	O
make	O
it	O
possible	O
for	O
her	O
to	O
receive	O
a	O
much	O
short	O
prison	O
sentence	O
.	O

As	O
Guyger	O
walks	O
free	O
awaiting	O
her	O
trial	O
,	O
the	O
9	O
people	O
who	O
were	O
arrested	O
protesting	O
the	O
murder	O
and	O
Guyger	O
’s	O
special	O
treatment	O
are	O
still	O
sitting	O
behind	O
bars	O
.	O

After	O
a	O
ceremony	O
for	O
Botham	O
Jean	O
,	O
the	O
protesters	O
were	O
arrested	O
for	O
obstructing	O
traffic	O
.	O

Attorney	O
Lee	O
Merritt	O
,	O
who	O
represents	O
Botham	O
Jean	O
’s	O
family	O
,	O
posted	O
an	O
update	O
about	O
the	O
injustice	O
on	O
Twitter	O
.	O

I	O
just	O
learned	O
the	O
Dallas	O
9	O
will	O
spend	O
another	O
night	O
in	O
jail	O
for	O
peacefully	O
protesting	O
brutality	B-PROP
.	O

Tues	O
Officer	O
Wiley	O
will	O
be	O
tried	O
for	O
shooting	O
an	O
unarmed	O
man	O
2x	O
he	O
wrongfully	O
suspected	O
of	O
burglarizing	O
his	O
own	O
car	O
.	O

D-9	O
have	O
already	O
spent	O
more	O
time	O
in	O
jail	O
then	O
he	O
ever	O
has	O
.	O

pic.twitter.com/mGHOzsN6Pp	O
—	O
S.	O
Lee	O
Merritt	O
,	O
Esq	O
.	O

(	O
@MeritLaw	O
)	O
September	O
17	O
,	O
2018	O

“	O
The	O
officer	O
responsible	O
for	O
the	O
completely	O
unjustifiable	B-PROP
shooting	O
death	O
of	O
O’Shea	O
Terry	O
has	O
been	O
returned	O
to	O
light	O
duty	O
and	O
has	O
faced	O
no	O
criminal	O
charges	O
whatsoever	O
.	O

The	O
officer	O
who	O
shot	O
and	O
killed	O
Botham	O
Jean	O
remains	O
on	O
the	O
Dallas	O
police	O
force	O
and	O
was	O
able	O
to	O
bond	O
out	O
on	O
manslaughter	O
charges	O
in	O
a	O
fraction	O
of	O
the	O
time	O
the	O
protestors	O
have	O
spent	O
in	O
jail	O
,	O
”	O
Merritt	O
said	O
in	O
a	O
statement	O
.	O

Merrit	O
cast	O
suspicion	O
on	O
the	O
police	O
for	O
intentionally	O
keeping	O
these	O
protestors	O
in	O
jail	O
to	O
send	O
a	O
message	O
and	O
make	O
an	O
example	O
out	O
of	O
them	O
.	O

The	O
reaction	O
from	O
the	O
police	O
,	O
in	O
this	O
case	O
,	O
has	O
shown	O
that	O
they	B-PROP
believe	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
have	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
license	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
kill	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
can	I-PROP
not	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
trusted	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
monitor	I-PROP
themselves	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
keep	I-PROP
one	I-PROP
another	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
check	I-PROP
.	O

They	B-PROP
have	I-PROP
no	I-PROP
interest	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
serving	I-PROP
justice	I-PROP
when	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
comes	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
enforcing	I-PROP
crimes	I-PROP
against	I-PROP
their	I-PROP
own	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

Article	O
posted	O
with	O
permission	O
from	O
John	O
Vibes	O
.	O

Cop	B-PROP
Killer	I-PROP
Supporter	I-PROP
Keith	O
Ellison	O
Calls	O
Cops	O
To	O
Protect	O
Him	O
From	O
Female	O
Journalist	O
Armed	O
With	O
Mic	O
&	O
Camera	O
Phone	O

Rep.	O
Keith	O
Ellison	O
(	O
D	O
-	O
MN	O
)	O
is	B-PROP
the	I-PROP
epitome	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
an	I-PROP
effeminate	I-PROP
man	I-PROP
today	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
America	I-PROP
.	O

He	O
stands	O
accused	O
by	O
two	O
women	O
who	O
claim	O
that	O
he	O
not	O
only	O
verbally	O
abused	O
them	O
,	O
but	O
physically	O
assaulted	O
them	O
as	O
well	O
,	O
and	O
no	O
,	O
these	O
women	O
did	O
n't	O
wait	O
decades	O
or	O
even	O
till	O
there	O
was	O
a	O
politically	O
opportune	O
time	O
to	O
voice	O
their	O
accusations	O
.	O

One	O
even	O
had	O
reported	O
him	O
to	O
the	O
police	O
.	O

Investigative	O
journalist	O
Laura	O
Loomer	O
was	O
informed	O
by	O
police	O
in	O
Minnesota	O
that	O
he	O
wanted	O
police	O
protection	O
from	O
her	O
when	O
he	O
found	O
out	O
she	O
was	O
attending	O
the	O
education	O
forum	O
that	O
was	O
held	O
Saturday	O
.	O

This	O
is	O
a	B-PROP
man	I-PROP
who	I-PROP
follows	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
demonic	I-PROP
religion	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
Islam	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
supports	I-PROP
cop	I-PROP
killers	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

He	O
does	O
all	O
of	O
this	O
while	O
he	O
stands	O
accused	O
of	O
abusing	O
women	O
and	O
running	O
to	O
be	O
attorney	O
general	O
in	O
Minnesota	O
,	O
even	O
though	O
he	O
possesses	O
no	O
attorney	O
's	O
license	O
that	O
is	O
valid	O
.	O

Here	O
's	O
Loomer	O
's	O
tweet	O
from	O
Sunday	O
with	O
video	O
of	O
her	O
speaking	O
to	O
a	O
policeman	O
about	O
it	O
.	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

*	O
John	O
Bolton	O
Richard	O
Grenell	O
Dina	O
Powell	O
Heather	O
Nauert	O
Ivanka	O
Trump	O

Email	O
*	O

Name	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Freedom	O
Outpost	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

“	O
An	O
Officer	O
in	O
Minnesota	O
informed	O
me	O
that	O
Keith	O
Ellison	O
’s	O
campaign	O
contacted	O
Apple	O
Valley	O
Police	O
in	O
MN	O
&	O
told	O
them	O
he	O
wanted	O
police	O
protection	O
from	O
me	O
when	O
he	O
found	O
out	O
I	O
was	O
attending	O
the	O
education	O
forum	O
that	O
was	O
held	O
yesterday	O
,	O
”	O
Loomer	O
wrote	O
.	O

SCOOP	O
:	O
An	O
Officer	O
in	O
Minnesota	O
informed	O
me	O
that	O
Keith	O
Ellison	O
’s	O
campaign	O
contacted	O
Apple	O
Valley	O
Police	O
in	O
MN	O
&	O
told	O
them	O
he	O
wanted	O
police	O
protection	O
from	O
me	O
when	O
he	O
found	O
out	O
I	O
was	O
attending	O
the	O
education	O
forum	O
that	O
was	O
held	O
yesterday	O
.	O

THAT	O
IS	O
WHY	O
the	O
police	O
were	O
there	O
.	O

👇	O
🏻	O
pic.twitter.com/ABIvsJNW4d	O
—	O
Laura	O
Loomer	O
(	O
@LauraLoomer	O
)	O
September	O
23	O
,	O
2018	O

On	O
Saturday	O
,	O
there	O
was	O
an	O
education	O
panel	O
at	O
the	O
Education	O
Minnesota	O
Apple	O
Valley	O
open	O
to	O
union	O
members	O
and	O
guests	O
.	O

Prior	O
to	O
the	O
event	O
,	O
Ellison	O
's	O
campaign	O
called	O
police	O
to	O
ensure	O
that	O
he	O
was	O
"	O
protected	O
"	O
from	O
a	O
woman	O
armed	O
with	O
a	O
mic	O
and	O
camera	O
phone	O
.	O

Loomer	O
peppered	B-PROP
him	O
with	O
questions	O
about	O
the	O
alleged	O
abuse	O
at	O
a	O
State	O
Attorney	O
General	O
debate	O
Friday	O
night	O
.	O

She	O
stood	O
alongside	O
other	O
female	O
survivors	O
of	O
abuse	O
.	O

Ellison	O
not	O
only	O
claimed	O
the	O
women	O
were	O
lying	O
but	O
then	O
fled	O
the	O
scene	O
.	O

At	O
least	O
he	O
said	O
something	O
there	O
,	O
which	O
is	O
more	O
than	O
I	O
can	O
say	O
for	O
his	O
response	O
earlier	O
in	O
September	O
when	O
Loomer	O
confronted	O
him	O
at	O
another	O
event	O
with	O
questions	O
.	O

Failing	O
to	O
answer	O
,	O
Ellison	O
tried	O
to	O
move	O
from	O
person	O
to	O
person	O
,	O
allowing	O
his	O
minions	O
to	O
try	O
and	O
provide	O
cover	O
for	O
him	O
,	O
similar	O
to	O
that	O
of	O
Maxine	O
Waters	O
,	O
but	O
there	O
was	O
no	O
"	O
member	O
's	O
only	O
"	O
elevator	O
to	O
flee	O
into	O
.	O

Finally	O
,	O
Ellison	O
fled	O
the	O
scene	O
,	O
hounding	O
by	O
Loomer	O
and	O
others	O
questioning	O
him	O
about	O
the	O
abuse	O
.	O

The	O
irony	O
is	O
of	O
Ellison	O
's	O
campaign	O
calling	O
on	O
the	O
police	O
to	O
protect	O
him	O
from	O
a	O
woman	O
,	O
armed	O
with	O
a	O
mic	O
and	O
camera	O
phone	O
,	O
who	O
is	O
simply	O
asking	O
him	O
to	O
respond	O
to	O
the	O
accusations	O
and	O
police	O
report	O
,	O
as	O
well	O
as	O
how	O
he	O
plans	O
on	O
being	O
attorney	O
general	O
without	O
a	O
license	O
,	O
when	O
he	O
has	O
shown	O
his	O
support	O
for	O
those	O
that	O
murder	O
police	O
officers	O
in	O
cold	O
blood	O
.	O

Scott	O
Johnson	O
reports	O
on	O
Ellison	O
's	O
sordid	B-PROP
history	O
supporting	O
such	O
criminals	O
.	O

Ellison	O
was	O
an	O
active	O
supporter	O
and	O
local	O
leader	O
of	O
the	O
Nation	O
of	O
Islam	O
in	O
Minneapolis	O
before	O
his	O
election	O
to	O
Congress	O
.	O

(	O
I	O
set	O
forth	O
this	O
history	O
in	O
some	O
detail	O
in	O
the	O
October	O
9	O
,	O
2006	O
issue	O
of	O
The	O
Weekly	O
Standard	O
.	O
)	O

Ellison	O
has	O
baldly	B-PROP
dissembled	I-PROP
about	O
this	O
history	O
since	O
2006	O
.	O

In	O
his	O
2014	O
memoir	O
My	O
Country	O
,	O
’	O
Tis	O
of	O
Thee	O
,	O
for	O
example	O
,	O
Ellison	O
simply	O
omitted	O
it	O
and	O
presented	O
himself	O
as	O
a	O
critic	O
of	O
Farrakhan	O
and	O
the	O
Nation	O
of	O
Islam	O
.	O

This	O
past	O
June	O
,	O
Ellison	O
told	O
Jake	O
Tapper	O
on	O
CNN	O
,	O
“	O
I	O
worked	O
on	O
the	O
Million	O
Man	O
March	O
and	O
I	O
was	O
proud	O
to	O
do	O
so	O
.	O

That	B-PROP
’s	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
.	O
”	O
But	O
that	O
was	O
n’t	O
it	O
.	O

Ellison	O
first	O
sought	O
office	O
as	O
a	O
Democrat	O
in	O
1998	O
as	O
Keith	O
Ellison	O
-	O
Muhammad	O
,	O
a	O
self	O
-	O
avowed	O
member	O
of	O
the	O
Nation	O
of	O
Islam	O
.	O

(	O
Ellison	O
-	O
Muhammad	O
is	O
just	O
one	O
of	O
three	O
Nation	O
of	O
Islam	O
names	O
Ellison	O
has	O
used	O
over	O
the	O
years	O
.	O
)	O

Fortunately	O
for	O
him	O
,	O
Ellison	O
’s	O
5th	O
District	O
constituents	O
have	O
n’t	O
much	O
cared	O
about	O
his	O
history	O
and	O
the	O
Minneapolis	O
Star	O
Tribune	O
has	O
almost	O
entirely	O
let	O
it	O
rest	O
exactly	O
where	O
Ellison	O
wants	O
it	O
.	O

But	O
seeking	O
the	O
top	O
law	O
enforcement	O
job	O
in	O
Minnesota	O
and	O
running	O
for	O
statewide	O
office	O
should	O
be	O
a	O
more	O
daunting	O
challenge	O
because	O
Ellison	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
an	I-PROP
extraordinarily	I-PROP
poor	I-PROP
fit	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
job	I-PROP
.	O

Among	O
the	O
troubling	O
threads	O
that	O
run	O
through	O
Ellison	O
’s	O
career	O
:	O
support	O
for	O
cop	B-PROP
killers	I-PROP
.	O

In	O
September	O
1992	O
Minneapolis	O
police	O
officer	O
Jerry	O
Haaf	O
was	O
murdered	O
execution	O
-	O
style	O
,	O
shot	O
in	O
the	O
back	O
as	O
he	O
took	O
a	O
coffee	O
break	O
at	O
a	O
restaurant	O
in	O
south	O
Minneapolis	O
.	O

Police	O
later	O
determined	O
that	O
Haaf	O
’s	O
murder	O
was	O
a	O
gang	O
hit	O
performed	O
by	O
four	O
members	O
of	O
the	O
city	O
’s	O
Vice	O
Lords	O
gang	O
.	O
The	O
leader	O
of	O
the	O
Vice	O
Lords	O
was	O
Sharif	O
Willis	O
,	O
a	O
convicted	O
murderer	O
who	O
had	O
been	O
released	O
from	O
prison	O
and	O
who	O
sought	O
respectability	O
as	O
a	O
responsible	O
gang	O
leader	O
from	O
gullible	B-PROP
municipal	I-PROP
authorities	I-PROP
while	O
operating	O
a	O
gang	O
front	O
called	O
United	O
for	O
Peace	O
.	O

The	O
four	O
Vice	O
Lords	O
members	O
who	O
murdered	O
Haaf	O
met	O
and	O
planned	O
the	O
murder	O
at	O
Willis	O
’s	O
house	O
.	O

Despite	O
the	O
fact	O
that	O
two	O
witnesses	O
implicated	O
Willis	O
in	O
the	O
planning	O
he	O
was	O
never	O
charged	O
because	O
law	O
enforcement	O
authorities	O
said	O
they	O
lacked	O
sufficient	O
evidence	O
to	O
convict	O
him	O
.	O

At	O
the	O
time	O
,	O
Ellison	O
was	O
a	O
Minneapolis	O
attorney	O
in	O
private	O
practice	O
.	O

And	O
within	O
a	O
month	O
of	O
Haaf	O
’s	O
murder	O
,	O
Ellison	O
appeared	O
with	O
Willis	O
supporting	O
the	O
United	O
for	O
Peace	O
gang	O
front	O
.	O

In	O
October	O
1992	O
,	O
Ellison	O
helped	O
organize	O
a	O
demonstration	O
against	O
Minneapolis	O
police	O
that	O
included	O
United	O
for	O
Peace	O
.	O

“	O
The	O
main	O
point	O
of	O
our	O
rally	O
is	O
to	O
support	O
United	O
for	O
Peace	O
[	O
in	O
its	O
fight	O
against	O
]	O
the	O
campaign	B-PROP
of	I-PROP
slander	I-PROP
the	O
police	O
federation	O
has	O
been	O
waging	O
,	O
”	O
said	O
Ellison	O
.	O

Willis	O
was	O
the	O
last	O
speaker	O
at	O
the	O
demonstration	O
.	O

According	O
to	O
a	O
contemporaneous	O
report	O
in	O
the	O
St.	O
Paul	O
Pioneer	O
Press	O
,	O
Willis	O
told	O
the	O
crowd	O
that	O
Minneapolis	O
police	O
were	O
experiencing	O
the	O
same	O
fear	O
from	O
young	O
black	O
men	O
that	O
blacks	O
had	O
felt	O
from	O
police	O
for	O
many	O
years	O
.	O

“	O
If	O
the	O
police	O
have	O
some	O
fear	O
,	O
I	O
understand	O
that	O
fear	O
,	O
”	O
Willis	O
said	O
.	O

“	O
We	O
seem	O
to	O
have	O
an	O
overabundance	O
of	O
bad	B-PROP
police	I-PROP
.	O

.	O

.	O

.	O

[	O
W]e’re	O
going	O
to	O
get	O
rid	O
of	O
them	O
,	O
”	O
Willis	O
said	O
.	O

“	O
They	B-PROP
’ve	I-PROP
got	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
go	I-PROP
.	I-PROP
”	I-PROP
The	O
Pioneer	O
Press	O
account	O
concludes	O
with	O
Ellison	O
’s	O
contribution	O
to	O
the	O
demonstration	O
:	O
“	O
Ellison	O
told	O
the	O
crowd	O
that	O
the	O
police	O
union	O
is	O
systematically	B-PROP
frightening	I-PROP
whites	I-PROP
in	O
order	O
to	O
get	O
more	O
police	O
officers	O
hired	O
.	O

That	O
way	O
,	O
Ellison	O
said	O
,	O
the	O
union	O
can	O
increase	O
its	O
power	O
base	O
.	O
”	O
Ellison	O
publicly	O
supported	O
the	O
Haaf	O
murder	O
defendants	O
.	O

In	O
February	O
1993	O
,	O
he	O
spoke	O
at	O
a	O
demonstration	O
for	O
one	O
of	O
them	O
during	O
his	O
trial	O
.	O

Ellison	O
led	O
the	O
crowd	O
assembled	O
at	O
the	O
courthouse	O
in	O
a	O
chant	O
that	O
was	O
ominous	B-PROP
in	O
the	O
context	O
of	O
Haaf	O
’s	O
cold	B-PROP
-	I-PROP
blooded	I-PROP
murder	I-PROP
:	O
“	O
We	B-PROP
do	I-PROP
n’t	I-PROP
get	I-PROP
no	I-PROP
justice	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
you	I-PROP
do	I-PROP
n’t	I-PROP
get	I-PROP
no	I-PROP
peace	I-PROP
.	O
”	O
Ellison	O
’s	O
working	O
relationship	O
with	O
Sharif	O
Willis	O
finally	O
came	O
to	O
an	O
end	O
in	O
February	O
1995	O
,	O
when	O
Willis	O
was	O
convicted	O
in	O
federal	O
court	O
on	O
several	O
counts	O
of	O
drug	O
and	O
gun	O
-	O
related	O
crimes	O
and	O
sent	O
back	O
to	O
prison	O
for	O
20	O
years	O
.	O

The	O
Haaf	O
case	O
was	O
n’t	O
an	O
aberration	O
for	O
Ellison	O
.	O

In	O
February	O
2000	O
,	O
he	O
spoke	O
at	O
a	O
fundraiser	O
sponsored	O
by	O
the	O
Minnesota	O
chapter	O
of	O
the	O
old	O
National	O
Lawyers	O
Guild	O
,	O
on	O
whose	O
steering	O
committee	O
he	O
had	O
served	O
—	O
the	O
chapter	O
was	O
raising	O
funds	O
for	O
former	O
Symbionese	O
Liberation	O
Army	O
member	O
Kathleen	O
Soliah	O
,	O
who	O
had	O
been	O
a	O
fugitive	O
from	O
justice	O
for	O
25	O
years	O
,	O
on	O
charges	O
related	O
to	O
the	O
attempted	O
pipe	O
bombing	O
of	O
Los	O
Angeles	O
police	O
officers	O
in	O
1975	O
.	O

(	O
The	O
National	O
Lawyers	O
Guild	O
is	O
an	O
old	O
Communist	O
front	O
group	O
that	O
somehow	O
survived	O
the	O
fall	O
of	O
the	O
Soviet	O
Union	O
.	O

Regimes	O
come	O
and	O
go	O
;	O
dupes	O
are	O
forever	O
.	O
)	O

In	O
his	O
National	O
Lawyers	O
Guild	O
speech	O
Ellison	O
spoke	O
favorably	O
of	O
cop	O
killers	O
Mumia	O
Abu	O
-	O
Jamal	O
and	O
“	O
Assata	O
Shakur	O
”	O
(	O
Joanne	O
Chesimard	O
)	O
,	O
who	O
was	O
wanted	O
for	O
the	O
murder	O
of	O
New	O
Jersey	O
state	O
trooper	O
Werner	O
Foerster	O
in	O
1973	O
.	O

Chesimard	O
was	O
convicted	O
of	O
that	O
murder	O
but	O
escaped	O
from	O
prison	O
in	O
1979	O
and	O
has	O
been	O
on	O
the	O
lam	O
in	O
Cuba	O
since	O
1984	O
.	O

Bryan	O
Burrough	O
’s	O
Days	O
of	O
Rage	O
has	O
a	O
riveting	O
account	O
of	O
Chesimard	O
’s	O
terrorist	O
career	O
.	O

In	O
2013	O
,	O
the	O
FBI	O
made	O
Chesimard	O
the	O
first	O
woman	O
named	O
to	O
its	O
Most	O
Wanted	O
Terrorists	O
List	O
.	O

The	O
FBI	O
has	O
offered	O
a	O
reward	O
of	O
up	O
to	O
$	O
1,000,000	O
for	O
her	O
capture	O
.	O

Yet	O
Ellison	O
prayed	O
for	O
Chesimard	O
in	O
his	O
National	O
Lawyers	O
Guild	O
speech	O
:	O
“	O
I	O
am	O
praying	O
that	O
Castro	O
does	O
not	O
get	O
to	O
the	O
point	O
where	O
he	O
has	O
to	O
really	O
barter	O
with	O
these	O
guys	O
over	O
here	O
because	O
they	O
’re	O
going	O
to	O
get	O
Assata	O
Shakur	O
,	O
they	O
’re	O
going	O
to	O
get	O
a	O
whole	O
lot	O
of	O
other	O
people	O
,	O
”	O
he	O
told	O
the	O
crowd	O
.	O

“	O
I	O
hope	O
the	O
Cuba[n	O
]	O
people	O
can	O
stick	O
to	O
it	O
,	O
because	O
the	O
freedom	O
of	O
some	O
good	O
decent	O
people	O
depends	O
on	O
it	O
.	O
”	O
Ellison	O
’s	O
support	O
for	O
Soliah	O
/	O
Olson	O
in	O
the	O
speech	O
is	O
equally	O
notable	O
.	O

He	O
denounced	O
law	O
enforcement	O
authorities	O
for	O
prosecuting	O
the	O
attempted	O
murder	O
of	O
police	O
officers	O
.	O

Referring	O
to	O
the	O
days	O
Soliah	O
/	O
Olson	O
had	O
spent	O
in	O
the	O
SLA	O
under	O
the	O
leadership	O
of	O
Donald	O
DeFreeze	O
(	O
“	O
Field	O
Marshal	O
Cinque	O
”	O
)	O
,	O
Ellison	O
hailed	B-PROP
Soliah	O
/	O
Olson	O
as	O
a	O
“	O
black	B-PROP
gang	I-PROP
member	I-PROP
”	O
and	O
portrayed	O
her	O
as	O
a	O
victim	O
of	O
government	O
persecution	O
.	O

He	O
described	O
her	O
as	O
one	O
of	O
those	O
who	O
had	O
been	O
“	O
fighting	O
for	O
freedom	O
in	O
the	O
‘	O
60s	O
and’70s	O
”	O
and	O
called	O
for	O
her	O
release	O
.	O

Ellison	O
to	O
the	O
contrary	O
notwithstanding	O
,	O
Soliah	O
/	O
Olson	O
pleaded	O
guilty	O
to	O
the	O
crimes	O
charged	O
in	O
Los	O
Angeles	O
and	O
to	O
an	O
additional	O
murder	O
charge	O
in	O
Sacramento	O
.	O

According	O
to	O
Ellison	O
,	O
Soliah	O
/	O
Olson	O
was	O
a	B-PROP
social	I-PROP
justice	I-PROP
warrior	I-PROP
fighting	B-PROP
the	I-PROP
good	I-PROP
fight	I-PROP
.	O

The	O
case	O
had	O
nothing	O
to	O
do	O
with	O
the	O
attempted	O
murder	O
of	O
police	O
officers	O
;	O
that	O
was	O
but	O
a	O
pretext	O
.	O

Seems	O
he	O
is	O
more	O
than	O
willing	O
to	O
use	O
the	O
police	O
to	O
shield	O
him	O
from	O
the	O
press	O
who	O
will	O
confront	O
him	O
publicly	O
while	O
taking	O
the	O
side	O
of	O
their	O
murderers	B-PROP
for	O
political	O
gain	O
.	O

Shame	B-PROP
on	I-PROP
you	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
Hakim	I-PROP
Muhammad	I-PROP
!	I-PROP

Article	O
posted	O
with	O
permission	O
from	O
Sons	O
Of	O
Liberty	O
Media	O

Citing	O
‘	O
Adverse	O
Conduct	O
’	O
Police	O
Finally	O
Fire	O
Amber	O
Guyger	O
for	O
Killing	O
Botham	O
Jean	O

Dallas	O
,	O
TX	O
—	O
After	O
the	O
Dallas	O
police	O
department	O
refused	O
to	O
fire	O
an	O
officer	O
who	O
admitted	O
to	O
killing	O
an	O
innocent	O
man	O
,	O
outrage	B-PROP
erupted	I-PROP
,	O
and	B-PROP
rightfully	I-PROP
so	I-PROP
.	O

Now	O
,	O
however	O
,	O
on	O
Monday	O
,	O
the	O
department	O
announced	O
that	O
officer	O
Amber	O
Guyger	O
has	O
finally	O
been	O
fired	O
.	O

On	O
Monday	O
,	O
the	O
Dallas	O
police	O
department	O
announced	O
that	O
the	O
officer	O
who	O
admitted	O
to	O
walking	O
into	O
the	O
apartment	O
of	O
26-year	O
-	O
old	O
Botham	O
Jean	O
and	O
killing	O
him	O
was	O
finally	O
fired	O
.	O

“	O
Dallas	O
Police	O
Chief	O
U.	O
Renee	O
Hall	O
terminated	O
Police	O
Officer	O
Amber	O
Guyger	O
,	O
#	O
10702	O
,	O
during	O
a	O
hearing	O
held	O
September	O
24	O
,	O
2018	O
,	O
”	O
the	O
statement	O
read	O
.	O

“	O
An	O
Internal	O
Affairs	O
investigation	O
concluded	O
that	O
on	O
September	O
9	O
,	O
2018	O
,	O
Officer	O
Guyger	O
,	O
#	O
10702	O
,	O
engaged	O
in	O
adverse	O
conduct	O
when	O
she	O
was	O
arrested	O
for	O
Manslaughter	O
.	O
”	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

*	O
John	O
Bolton	O
Richard	O
Grenell	O
Dina	O
Powell	O
Heather	O
Nauert	O
Ivanka	O
Trump	O

Email	O
*	O

Email	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Freedom	O
Outpost	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

The	O
department	O
then	O
went	O
on	O
to	O
note	O
that	O
Guyger	O
could	O
appeal	O
this	O
firing	O
under	O
their	O
civil	O
service	O
rules	O
.	O

Officer	O
Guyger	O
was	O
terminated	O
for	O
her	O
actions	O
.	O

She	O
was	O
hired	O
in	O
November	O
2013	O
and	O
was	O
assigned	O
to	O
the	O
Southeast	O
Patrol	O
Division	O
.	O

Under	O
civil	O
service	O
rules	O
,	O
Officer	O
Guyger	O
has	O
the	O
right	O
to	O
appeal	O
her	O
discipline	O
.	O

This	O
move	O
is	O
noteworthy	O
as	O
the	O
department	O
has	O
been	O
standing	O
up	O
against	O
those	O
who	O
have	O
been	O
calling	O
for	O
the	O
officer	O
to	O
be	O
fired	O
.	O

As	O
recently	O
as	O
Friday	O
,	O
Hall	O
refused	O
to	O
fire	O
Guyger	O
,	O
saying	O
in	O
part	O
,	O
“	O
There	O
is	O
one	O
overriding	O
reason	O
that	O
I	O
have	O
not	O
taken	O
any	O
administrative	O
or	O
employment	O
action	O
against	O
Officer	O
Amber	O
Guyger	O
.	O

I	O
do	O
n’t	O
want	O
to	O
interfere	O
with	O
the	O
on	O
-	O
going	O
criminal	O
investigation	O
into	O
her	O
actions	O
.	O
”	O

Also	O
,	O
in	O
a	O
town	O
hall	O
meeting	O
last	O
week	O
,	O
Hall	O
again	O
stood	O
behind	O
her	O
choice	O
to	O
refuse	O
to	O
fire	O
Guyger	O
,	O
claiming	O
it	O
would	O
be	O
against	O
the	O
law	O
.	O

“	O
I	O
ca	O
n’t	O
do	O
that	O
because	O
there	O
are	O
both	O
local	O
,	O
state	O
and	O
federal	O
laws	O
that	O
prohibit	O
me	O
from	O
taking	O
action	O
.	O

There	O
are	O
civil	O
service	O
laws	O
we	O
have	O
to	O
adhere	O
to	O
,	O
”	O
said	O
Hall	O
.	O

Apparently	O
,	O
it	O
is	O
no	O
longer	O
against	O
the	O
law	O
.	O

This	O
news	O
will	O
likely	O
be	O
well	O
received	O
by	O
the	O
Jean	O
family	O
as	O
well	O
as	O
the	O
activists	O
who	O
have	O
been	O
calling	O
for	O
justice	O
for	O
Botham	O
since	O
the	O
beginning	O
.	O

As	O
TFTP	O
previously	O
reported	O
,	O
the	O
idea	O
of	O
not	O
firing	O
Guyger	O
seemed	O
utterly	B-PROP
preposterous	I-PROP
as	O
she	O
admitted	O
to	O
doing	O
something	O
wrong	O
.	O

While	O
controversy	O
swarms	O
the	O
case	O
of	O
why	O
she	O
may	O
have	O
killed	O
Jean	O
,	O
there	O
is	O
no	O
doubt	O
that	O
she	O
did	O
kill	O
him	O
.	O

This	O
is	O
a	O
fact	O
.	O

This	O
public	O
servant	O
walked	O
into	O
an	O
innocent	O
man	O
’s	O
home	O
and	O
shot	O
him	O
dead	O
.	O

Because	O
of	O
her	O
actions	O
,	O
this	O
man	O
no	O
longer	O
lives	O
.	O

This	O
alone	O
should	O
have	O
been	O
enough	O
to	O
fire	O
her	O
.	O

Surprisingly	O
enough	O
,	O
NRA	O
spokesperson	O
Dana	O
Loesch	O
responded	O
to	O
the	O
firing	O
of	O
Guyger	O
with	O
one	O
word	O
,	O
“	O
Good	O
,	O
”	O
showing	O
her	O
support	O
for	O
the	O
move	O
.	O

For	O
those	O
who	O
do	O
n’t	O
recall	O
,	O
Loesch	O
sparked	O
controversy	O
earlier	O
this	O
month	O
by	O
claiming	O
that	O
if	O
Botham	B-PROP
Jean	I-PROP
were	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
gun	I-PROP
owner	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
he	I-PROP
may	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
alive	I-PROP
today	I-PROP
.	O

Indeed	O
,	O
as	O
TFTP	O
reported	O
over	O
the	O
weekend	O
,	O
a	O
father	O
in	O
Prince	O
George	O
’s	O
County	O
opened	O
fire	O
on	O
officers	O
as	O
they	O
wrongly	O
entered	O
his	O
apartment	O
.	O

He	O
shot	O
two	O
officers	O
.	O

Not	O
only	O
was	O
he	O
not	O
arrested	O
,	O
but	O
the	O
police	O
chief	O
praised	O
him	O
and	O
apologized	O
.	O

In	O
response	O
to	O
Guyger	O
’s	O
termination	O
,	O
the	O
family	O
’s	O
attorney	O
,	O
Lee	O
Merritt	O
noted	O
that	O
the	O
family	O
expressed	O
“	O
satisfaction	O
”	O
with	O
the	O
move	O
.	O

“	O
The	O
Jean	O
family	O
expressed	O
satisfaction	O
in	O
this	O
explanation	O
and	O
in	O
Guyger	O
’s	O
termination	O
.	O

We	O
see	O
it	O
as	O
an	O
initial	O
victory	O
—	O
well	O
received	O
on	O
the	O
day	O
Botham	O
Jean	O
is	O
laid	O
to	O
rest	O
in	O
his	O
native	O
country	O
in	O
St.	O
Lucia	O
,	O
”	O
Merritt	O
’s	O
office	O
said	O
in	O
a	O
statement	O
,	O
adding	O
that	O
they	O
are	O
committed	O
to	O
see	O
a	O
“	O
proper	O
murder	O
indictment	O
,	O
conviction	O
and	O
appropriate	O
sentencing	O
.	O
”	O

Article	O
posted	O
with	O
permission	O
from	O
The	O
Free	O
Thought	O
Project	O

Accused	O
Woman	O
Abuser	O
Keith	O
Ellison	O
Asks	O
House	O
Ethics	O
to	O
Investigate	O

Well	O
,	O
unlike	O
Supreme	O
Court	O
nominee	O
Brett	O
Kavanaugh	O
,	O
Rep.	O
Keith	O
Ellison	O
(	O
D	O
-	O
MN	O
)	O
,	O
who	O
is	O
running	O
for	O
attorney	O
general	O
in	O
Minnesota	O
without	O
an	O
active	O
attorney	O
's	O
license	O
,	O
has	O
not	O
stood	O
before	O
a	O
committee	O
to	O
deny	O
or	O
address	O
accusations	O
against	O
him	O
by	O
several	O
women	O
who	O
have	O
accused	O
him	O
of	O
verbal	O
and	O
physical	O
abuse	O
.	O

At	O
least	O
one	O
woman	O
even	O
filed	O
a	O
police	O
report	O
about	O
his	O
abuse	O
.	O

No	O
,	O
Ellison	O
has	O
called	O
on	O
the	O
House	O
of	O
Representatives	O
,	O
not	O
the	O
FBI	O
,	O
as	O
Senate	O
Democrats	O
have	O
urged	O
in	O
the	O
case	O
of	O
Judge	O
Kavanaugh	O
,	O
to	O
investigate	O
the	O
claims	O
.	O

"	O
I	O
am	O
taking	O
this	O
step	O
now	O
because	O
I	O
am	O
innocent	O
and	O
eager	O
to	O
see	O
this	O
entire	O
matter	O
resolved	O
,	O
”	O
Ellison	O
said	O
in	O
a	O
statement	O
.	O

“	O
These	O
allegations	O
have	O
lingered	O
in	O
the	O
public	O
sphere	O
,	O
and	O
remain	O
unsubstantiated	O
,	O
"	O
he	O
added	O
.	O

"	O
I	O
welcome	O
an	O
investigation	O
by	O
the	O
House	O
to	O
allow	O
us	O
to	O
move	O
on	O
.	O
"	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

*	O
John	O
Bolton	O
Richard	O
Grenell	O
Dina	O
Powell	O
Heather	O
Nauert	O
Ivanka	O
Trump	O

Email	O
*	O

Comments	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Freedom	O
Outpost	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

Well	O
,	O
that	O
's	O
not	O
entirely	O
accurate	O
.	O

We	O
do	O
have	O
a	O
police	O
report	O
,	O
unlike	O
the	O
accusations	O
against	O
Brett	O
Kavanaugh	O
.	O

Of	O
course	O
,	O
his	O
supporters	O
have	O
hired	O
an	O
attorney	O
to	O
perform	O
an	O
investigation	O
.	O

The	O
Star	O
Tribune	O
reports	O
:	O

The	O
Minnesota	O
Democratic	O
-	O
Farmer	O
-	O
Labor	O
Party	O
has	O
hired	O
attorney	O
Susan	O
Ellingstad	O
to	O
conduct	O
a	O
separate	O
investigation	O
.	O

Ellingstad	O
is	O
a	O
partner	O
at	O
the	O
firm	O
where	O
attorney	O
Charles	O
Nauen	O
,	O
who	O
represents	O
the	O
DFL	O
,	O
works	O
.	O

DFL	O
Chairman	O
Ken	O
Martin	O
said	O
on	O
Tuesday	O
that	O
the	O
investigation	O
was	O
finished	O
or	O
close	O
to	O
finished	O
and	O
would	O
be	O
released	O
soon	O
.	O

Ellison	O
is	O
also	O
deputy	O
chairman	O
of	O
the	O
Democratic	O
National	O
Committee	O
.	O

After	O
the	O
domestic	O
abuse	O
allegation	O
emerged	O
in	O
August	O
,	O
the	O
DNC	O
said	O
it	O
is	O
looking	O
into	O
what	O
happened	O
.	O

“	O
All	O
allegations	O
of	O
domestic	O
abuse	O
are	O
disturbing	B-PROP
and	O
should	O
be	O
taken	O
seriously	O
.	O

We	O
are	O
working	O
with	O
the	O
Minnesota	O
state	O
party	O
to	O
review	O
these	O
allegations	O
,	O
”	O
a	O
DNC	O
spokeswoman	O
said	O
in	O
a	O
statement	O
Wednesday	O
morning	O
,	O
declining	O
to	O
comment	O
further	O
.	O

The	O
Democratic	O
Party	O
’s	O
choice	O
of	O
Ellingstad	O
to	O
conduct	O
the	O
investigation	O
was	O
met	O
with	O
derision	O
from	O
many	O
who	O
said	O
she	O
is	O
not	O
independent	O
,	O
including	O
Donald	B-PROP
Trump	I-PROP
Jr.	I-PROP
,	O
who	B-PROP
mocked	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
investigation	I-PROP
in	O
a	O
Tweet	O
Wednesday	O
.	O

The	O
firm	O
Ellingstad	O
works	O
for	O
,	O
Lockridge	O
Grindal	O
Nauen	O
,	O
has	O
a	O
political	O
committee	O
that	O
has	O
donated	O
to	O
both	O
Republican	O
and	O
Democratic	O
candidates	O
,	O
including	O
Ellison	O
,	O
according	O
to	O
Federal	O
Election	O
Commission	O
filings	O
.	O

The	O
contributions	O
to	O
Democrats	O
outweigh	O
the	O
Republicans	O
by	O
a	O
margin	O
of	O
about	O
four	O
to	O
one	O
.	O

As	O
we	O
previously	O
reported	O
:	O

Rep.	O
Keith	O
Ellison	O
,	O
who	O
is	O
currently	O
running	O
for	O
attorney	O
general	O
of	O
Minnesota	O
,	O
is	O
being	O
accused	O
of	O
domestic	O
violence	O
against	O
his	O
former	O
partner	O
Karen	O
Monahan	O
.	O

Austin	O
Monahan	O
,	O
Karen	O
Monahan	O
’s	O
son	O
,	O
aired	O
the	O
allegations	O
in	O
a	O
Facebook	O
post	O
Saturday	O
night	O
.	O

According	O
to	O
Austin	O
Monahan	O
,	O
Ellison	O
put	B-PROP
his	O
mother	O
through	B-PROP
“	I-PROP
pure	I-PROP
hell	I-PROP
.	O
”	O
In	O
the	O
Facebook	O
post	O
,	O
he	O
claims	O
to	O
have	O
seen	O
a	O
video	O
of	O
Ellison	O
dragging	O
Karen	O
Monahan	O
off	O
the	O
bed	O
by	O
her	O
feet	O
while	O
screaming	B-PROP
expletives	I-PROP
at	I-PROP
her	I-PROP
.	O

The	O
alleged	O
incident	O
is	O
just	O
one	O
of	O
several	O
,	O
Austin	O
Monahan	O
warned	O
.	O

State	O
Rep.	O
Debra	O
Hilstrom	O
(	O
D	O
-	O
Brooklyn	O
Center	O
)	O
was	O
quick	O
to	O
voice	O
her	O
concern	O
over	O
the	O
accusations	O
,	O
calling	O
on	O
Ellison	O
to	O
“	O
answer	O
these	O
allegations	O
.	O
”	O
DFL	O
-	O
endorsed	O
candidate	O
for	O
attorney	O
general	O
of	O
Minnesota	O
Matt	O
Pelikan	O
also	O
reacted	O
to	O
the	O
story	O
,	O
calling	O
the	O
allegations	O
“	O
extremely	B-PROP
troubling	I-PROP
.	O
”	O
Karen	O
Monahan	O
has	O
also	O
hinted	O
at	O
the	O
alleged	O
abuse	O
on	O
Twitter	O
,	O
telling	O
Ellison	O
that	O
her	O
“	O
kids	O
,	O
job	O
,	O
health	O
,	O
finances	O
,	O
humanity	O
was	O
deeply	B-PROP
impacted	O
by	O
the	O
abuse	O
you	O
are	O
well	O
aware	O
of	O
.	O
”	O
Karen	O
Monahan	O
claims	O
she	O
has	O
videos	O
,	O
recordings	O
,	O
and	O
messages	O
to	O
prove	O
her	O
story	O
.	O

Ellison	O
has	O
admitted	O
the	O
relationship	O
,	O
but	O
is	O
denying	O
the	O
abuse	O
.	O

And	O
the	O
relationship	O
was	O
clearly	O
real	O
.	O

Karen	O
Monahan	O
,	O
an	O
organizer	O
with	O
the	O
Sierra	O
Club	O
,	O
was	O
in	O
a	O
relationship	O
with	O
Ellison	O
for	O
years	O
.	O

The	O
two	O
are	O
seen	O
together	O
in	O
many	O
of	O
her	O
social	O
media	O
posts	O
,	O
including	O
hiking	O
in	O
together	O
national	O
parks	O
and	O
posing	O
with	O
the	O
Obamas	O
at	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
.	O

Records	O
show	O
she	O
lived	O
in	O
his	O
Minneapolis	O
home	O
before	O
their	O
relationship	O
ended	O
.	O

Ellison	O
,	O
who	O
was	O
previously	O
married	O
to	O
a	O
different	O
woman	O
,	O
is	O
divorced	O
.	O

It	O
's	O
hard	O
to	O
know	O
what	O
really	O
happened	O
in	O
a	O
relationship	O
.	O

And	O
the	O
media	O
has	O
kept	O
it	O
quiet	O
.	O

"	O
Keith	O
Ellison	O
flatly	O
denies	O
allegation	O
that	O
he	O
abused	O
an	O
ex	O
girlfriend	O
.	O

The	O
story	O
had	O
been	O
circulating	O
in	O
MN	O
,	O
and	O
not	O
held	O
up	O
under	O
media	O
scrutiny	O
,	O
so	O
no	O
stories	O
ran	O
.	O

It	O
blew	O
up	O
last	O
night	O
after	O
the	O
ex	O
’s	O
son	O
posted	O
the	O
allegation	O
on	O
Facebook	O
.	O
"	O

Dave	O
Weigel	O
.	O

It	O
's	O
not	O
quite	O
the	O
first	O
time	O
for	O
Keith	O
X.	O

This	O
is	O
not	O
the	O
first	O
time	O
Ellison	O
has	O
faced	O
misconduct	O
allegations	O
.	O

In	O
2006	O
,	O
a	O
woman	O
named	O
Amy	O
Alexandar	O
claimed	O
that	O
Ellison	O
ostracized	O
her	O
and	O
smeared	B-PROP
her	I-PROP
name	I-PROP
after	O
having	O
an	O
extramarital	O
affair	O
with	O
her	O
in	O
the	O
1990s	O
and	O
then	O
again	O
in	O
the	O
2000s	O
.	O

Ellison	O
in	O
2005	O
filed	O
a	O
restraining	O
order	O
against	O
her	O
after	O
what	O
he	O
described	O
as	O
phone	O
and	O
email	O
harassment	O
.	O

She	O
subsequently	O
tried	O
to	O
get	O
a	O
restraining	O
order	O
against	O
him	O
,	O
which	O
a	O
judge	O
denied	O
,	O
ordering	O
her	O
to	O
stop	O
repeating	O
allegations	O
of	O
an	O
affair	O
or	O
intimidation	O
.	O

Ellison	O
subsequently	O
agreed	O
to	O
dismiss	O
his	O
restraining	O
order	O
against	O
her	O
if	O
she	O
no	O
longer	O
contacted	O
him	O
.	O

I	O
'm	O
not	O
sure	O
that	O
this	O
is	O
nothing	O
more	O
than	O
damage	O
control	O
just	O
before	O
the	O
elections	O
.	O

Ellison	O
won	O
the	O
primary	O
days	O
after	O
the	O
allegations	O
were	O
made	O
public	O
.	O

Of	O
course	O
,	O
accusations	O
does	O
not	O
make	O
one	O
guilty	O
for	O
Ellison	O
anymore	O
than	O
they	O
do	O
for	O
Judge	O
Kavanaugh	O
.	O

However	O
,	O
at	O
least	O
in	O
the	O
case	O
of	O
Ellison	O
,	O
at	O
least	O
one	O
of	O
the	O
women	O
were	O
not	O
scared	O
about	O
their	O
reputation	O
and	O
had	O
any	O
political	O
motive	O
to	O
call	O
the	O
police	O
and	O
file	O
a	O
report	O
.	O

When	O
it	O
comes	O
to	O
Ellison	O
though	O
,	O
we	O
know	O
he	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
an	I-PROP
effeminate	I-PROP
pansy	I-PROP
who	I-PROP
simply	I-PROP
does	I-PROP
not	I-PROP
want	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
answer	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
American	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
and	O
even	O
seeks	O
security	O
to	O
hide	O
from	O
a	O
female	O
report	O
with	O
a	O
mic	O
and	O
a	O
camera	O
.	O

Judge	O
Kavanaugh	O
has	O
faced	O
it	O
all	O
and	O
fought	O
back	O
against	O
it	O
.	O

Star	O
Tribune	O
Sues	O
To	O
Unseal	O
Accused	O
Serial	B-PROP
Woman	I-PROP
Abuser	I-PROP
Keith	O
Ellison	O
's	O
Divorce	O
Records	O

Flashback	O
in	O
2004	O
,	O
when	O
up	O
until	O
then	O
,	O
Barack	O
Obama	O
could	O
n’t	O
win	O
an	O
election	O
.	O

But	O
during	O
his	O
2004	O
campaign	O
for	O
the	O
Senate	O
,	O
Obama	O
and	O
his	O
corrupt	B-PROP
party	I-PROP
in	O
Chicago	O
somehow	O
managed	O
to	O
unseal	O
the	O
divorce	O
records	O
of	O
his	O
opponent	O
Jack	O
Ryan	O
,	O
who	O
was	O
leading	O
by	O
a	O
large	O
margin	O
.	O

The	O
Ryan	O
divorce	O
records	O
were	O
sealed	O
at	O
their	O
mutual	O
request	O
of	O
both	O
Mr.	O
and	O
Mrs.	O
Ryan	O
.	O

But	O
the	B-PROP
Democrat	I-PROP
machine	I-PROP
got	O
them	O
unsealed	O
anyway	O
.	O

Barack	O
Obama	O
’s	O
backers	O
emailed	O
reporters	O
about	O
the	O
divorce	O
controversy	O
.	O

The	O
divorce	O
records	O
were	O
not	O
pretty	O
.	O

Ryan	O
resigned	O
.	O

Obama	O
took	O
the	O
field	O
.	O

Different	O
rules	O
for	O
the	O
lawless	B-PROP
party	I-PROP
.	O

STAR	O
TRIBUNE	O
SUES	O
TO	O
UNSEAL	O
U.S.	O
REP	O
.	O
KEITH	O
ELLISON	O
’S	O
DIVORCE	O
RECORDS	O

By	O
Jesse	O
Van	O
Berkel	O
,	O
Star	O
Tribune	O
,	O
September	O
26	O
,	O
2018	O
:	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

*	O
John	O
Bolton	O
Richard	O
Grenell	O
Dina	O
Powell	O
Heather	O
Nauert	O
Ivanka	O
Trump	O

Email	O
*	O

Email	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Freedom	O
Outpost	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

The	O
Star	O
Tribune	O
has	O
joined	O
a	O
legal	O
effort	O
to	O
unseal	O
the	O
divorce	O
records	O
of	O
U.S.	O
Rep.	O
Keith	O
Ellison	O
,	O
the	O
Democratic	O
candidate	O
for	O
attorney	O
general	O
.	O

Ellison	O
and	O
his	O
ex	O
-	O
wife	O
,	O
Kim	O
Ellison	O
,	O
divorced	O
in	O
2012	O
.	O

The	O
related	O
records	O
have	O
been	O
sealed	O
,	O
so	O
the	O
public	O
can	O
not	O
access	O
the	O
information	O
.	O

The	O
Star	O
Tribune	O
’s	O
motion	O
to	O
intervene	O
and	O
unseal	O
the	O
records	O
follows	O
a	O
similar	O
action	O
by	O
Alpha	O
News	O
,	O
a	O
right	O
-	O
leaning	O
online	O
news	O
and	O
opinion	O
site	O
.	O

The	O
efforts	O
follow	O
allegations	O
by	O
Ellison	O
’s	O
ex	O
-	O
girlfriend	O
,	O
Karen	O
Monahan	O
,	O
that	O
Ellison	O
domestically	O
abused	O
her	O
in	O
2016	O
.	O

He	O
has	O
denied	O
the	O
allegation	O
repeatedly	O
,	O
and	O
Monahan	O
has	O
continued	O
to	O
press	O
her	O
case	O
in	O
frequent	O
tweets	O
about	O
Ellison	O
.	O

On	O
Sunday	O
,	O
Monahan	O
tweeted	O
to	O
Ellison	O
:	O
“	O
This	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
not	I-PROP
going	I-PROP
away	I-PROP
and	O
you	B-PROP
are	I-PROP
making	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
worse	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
you	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
your	I-PROP
family	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
district	I-PROP
by	I-PROP
lying	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
smearing	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
getting	I-PROP
others	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
do	I-PROP
your	I-PROP
dirty	I-PROP
work	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
victim	I-PROP
shaming	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
etc	I-PROP
.	O
”	O
She	O
referred	O
again	O
to	O
a	O
video	O
she	O
says	O
she	O
has	O
of	O
Ellison	O
dragging	O
her	O
off	O
a	O
bed	O
,	O
which	O
he	O
has	O
said	O
did	O
not	O
happen	O
.	O

She	O
has	O
declined	O
to	O
show	O
the	O
video	O
,	O
saying	O
it	O
is	O
traumatizing	O
.	O

She	O
also	O
told	O
CNN	O
she	O
misplaced	O
it	O
.	O

Monahan	O
also	O
recently	O
released	O
a	O
medical	O
record	O
that	O
shows	O
she	O
told	O
a	O
doctor	O
in	O
2017	O
that	O
she	O
had	O
been	O
in	O
an	O
abusive	B-PROP
relationship	O
with	O
Ellison	O
.	O

Ken	O
Martin	O
,	O
the	O
chairman	O
of	O
the	O
Minnesota	O
DFL	O
,	O
said	O
Tuesday	O
that	O
the	O
party	O
’s	O
investigation	O
of	O
the	O
allegations	O
against	O
Ellison	O
will	O
be	O
finished	O
soon	O
,	O
then	O
released	O
to	O
the	O
public	O
.	O

An	O
external	O
investigator	O
was	O
hired	O
to	O
conduct	O
the	O
inquiry	O
.	O

The	O
Star	O
Tribune	O
argued	O
that	O
,	O
given	O
the	O
public	O
interest	O
around	O
that	O
situation	O
and	O
Kim	O
Ellison	O
’s	O
public	O
support	O
of	O
her	O
ex	O
-	O
husband	O
,	O
the	O
divorce	O
records	O
are	O
a	O
matter	O
of	O
concern	O
to	O
voters	O
.	O

Divorce	O
records	O
are	O
typically	O
public	O
,	O
but	O
judges	O
will	O
often	O
agree	O
to	O
seal	O
them	O
if	O
both	O
parties	O
to	O
the	O
case	O
agree	O
and	O
no	O
one	O
else	O
objects	O
.	O

The	O
Ellison	O
campaign	O
released	O
a	O
statement	O
from	O
Kim	O
Ellison	O
on	O
behalf	O
of	O
both	O
her	O
and	O
Keith	O
Ellison	O
.	O

“	O
Our	O
divorce	O
simply	O
is	O
n’t	O
the	O
public	O
’s	O
business	O
,	O
and	O
therefore	O
,	O
when	O
we	O
separated	O
,	O
we	O
jointly	O
asked	O
the	O
court	O
to	O
seal	O
the	O
file	O
.	O

Now	O
,	O
one	O
month	O
before	O
a	O
closely	O
contested	O
election	O
for	O
Minnesota	O
Attorney	O
General	O
,	O
a	O
conservative	O
group	O
wants	O
to	O
probe	O
our	O
divorce	O
file	O
in	O
search	O
of	O
something	O
to	O
use	O
against	O
Keith	O
in	O
this	O
race	O
.	O

I	O
am	O
disappointed	O
that	O
the	O
Star	O
Tribune	O
would	O
choose	O
to	O
file	O
this	O
motion	O
.	O
”	O

Why	O
the	B-PROP
Coordinated	I-PROP
Alternative	I-PROP
Media	I-PROP
Purge	I-PROP
Should	I-PROP
TERRIFY	I-PROP
Everyone	I-PROP
:	O
Soon	B-PROP
Those	I-PROP
Who	I-PROP
Hate	I-PROP
Freedom	I-PROP
Will	I-PROP
Have	I-PROP
Unquestioned	I-PROP
Access	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
Minds	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
2	I-PROP
Billion	I-PROP
People	I-PROP

Yesterday	O
,	O
the	B-PROP
alternative	I-PROP
media	I-PROP
purge	I-PROP
was	O
boldly	O
advanced	O
in	O
a	O
coordinated	O
effort	O
to	O
silence	O
people	O
who	O
dissent	O
from	O
establishment	O
views	O
.	O

It	B-PROP
’s	I-PROP
just	I-PROP
one	I-PROP
more	I-PROP
step	I-PROP
toward	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
monopoly	I-PROP
on	I-PROP
information	I-PROP
by	I-PROP
those	I-PROP
who	I-PROP
hate	I-PROP
freedom	I-PROP
.	O

At	O
this	O
rate	O
,	O
they	O
’ll	O
soon	O
have	O
unquestioned	O
access	O
to	O
the	O
minds	O
of	O
more	O
than	O
2	O
billion	O
people	O
.	O

And	O
this	O
should	O
terrify	B-PROP
everyone	O
who	O
wants	O
to	O
be	O
free	O
to	O
question	O
the	O
status	O
quo	O
and	O
to	O
seek	O
a	O
wide	O
range	O
of	O
information	O
.	O

Hundreds	O
of	O
alternative	O
media	O
site	O
administrators	O
logged	O
onto	O
Facebook	O
to	O
discover	O
that	O
their	O
accounts	O
had	O
been	O
removed	O
.	O

Soon	O
after	O
,	O
many	O
of	O
these	O
sites	O
and	O
their	O
writers	O
found	O
that	O
their	O
Twitter	O
accounts	O
had	O
also	O
been	O
suspended	O
.	O

Popular	O
pages	O
like	O
The	O
AntiMedia	O
(	O
2.1	O
million	O
fans	O
)	O
,	O
The	O
Free	O
Thought	O
Project	O
(	O
3.1	O
million	O
fans	O
)	O
,	O
Press	O
for	O
Truth	O
(	O
350	O
K	O
fans	O
)	O
,	O
Police	O
the	O
Police	O
(	O
1.9	O
million	O
fans	O
)	O
,	O
Cop	O
Block	O
(	O
1.7	O
million	O
fans	O
)	O
,	O
and	O
Punk	O
Rock	O
Libertarians	O
(	O
125	O
K	O
fans	O
)	O
are	O
just	O
a	O
few	O
of	O
the	O
ones	O
which	O
were	O
unpublished	O
.	O

Why	B-PROP
were	I-PROP
these	I-PROP
alternative	I-PROP
media	I-PROP
accounts	I-PROP
removed	I-PROP
?	I-PROP

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

*	O
John	O
Bolton	O
Richard	O
Grenell	O
Dina	O
Powell	O
Heather	O
Nauert	O
Ivanka	O
Trump	O

Email	O
*	O

Phone	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Freedom	O
Outpost	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

The	O
reason	O
given	O
does	O
n’t	O
really	O
add	O
up	O
.	O

Facebook	O
told	O
the	O
LA	O
Times	O
that	O
these	O
pages	O
had	O
violated	O
the	O
company	O
’s	O
spam	O
policies	O
.	O

“	O
Today	O
,	O
we	O
’re	O
removing	O
559	O
Pages	O
and	O
251	O
accounts	O
that	O
have	O
consistently	O
broken	O
our	O
rules	O
against	O
spam	O
and	O
coordinated	O
inauthentic	O
behavior	O
,	O
”	O
the	O
company	O
said	O
in	O
a	O
blog	O
post	O
.	O

“	O
People	O
will	O
only	O
share	O
on	O
Facebook	O
if	O
they	O
feel	O
safe	O
and	O
trust	O
the	O
connections	O
they	O
make	O
here	O
.	O
”	O
(	O
source	O
)	O

But	O
this	O
is	O
n’t	O
actually	O
what	O
their	O
spam	O
policy	O
says	O
.	O

Here	O
’s	O
the	O
policy	O
.	O

We	O
work	O
hard	O
to	O
limit	O
the	O
spread	O
of	O
commercial	O
spam	O
to	O
prevent	O
false	O
advertising	O
,	O
fraud	O
,	O
and	O
security	O
breaches	O
,	O
all	O
of	O
which	O
detract	O
from	O
people	O
’s	O
ability	O
to	O
share	O
and	O
connect	O
.	O

We	O
do	O
not	O
allow	O
people	O
to	O
use	O
misleading	O
or	O
inaccurate	O
information	O
to	O
collect	O
likes	O
,	O
followers	O
,	O
or	O
shares	O
.	O

Do	O
Not	O
:	O
Artificially	O
increase	O
distribution	O
for	O
financial	O
gain	O

Create	O
or	O
use	O
fake	O
accounts	O
or	O
compromise	O
other	O
people	O
’s	O
accounts	O
to	O

Impersonate	O
or	O
pretend	O
to	O
be	O
a	O
business	O
,	O
organization	O
,	O
public	O
figure	O
,	O
or	O
private	O
individual	O

Attempt	O
to	O
create	O
connections	O
,	O
create	O
content	O
,	O
or	O
message	O
people	O

Restrict	O
access	O
to	O
content	O
by	O
requiring	O
people	O
to	O
like	O
,	O
share	O
,	O
or	O
recommend	O
before	O
viewing	O

Encourage	O
likes	O
,	O
shares	O
,	O
or	O
clicks	O
under	O
false	O
pretenses	O

Maliciously	O
use	O
login	O
credentials	O
or	O
personally	O
identifiable	O
information	O
by	O
:	O

Attempting	O
to	O
gather	O
or	O
share	O
login	O
credentials	O
or	O
personally	O
identifiable	O
information	O

Using	O
another	O
person	O
’s	O
login	O
credentials	O
or	O
personally	O
identifiable	O
information	O

Promise	O
non	O
-	O
existent	O
Facebook	O
features	O
(	O
source	O
)	O

The	O
Washington	O
Post	O
originally	O
said	O
that	O
these	O
pages	O
were	O
purged	O
for	O
“	O
pushing	O
political	O
messages	O
for	O
profit	O
”	O
as	O
you	O
can	O
see	O
by	O
their	O
URL	O
:	O

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2018/10/11/facebook-purged-over-accounts-pages-pushing-political-messages-profit/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.fa1a364488b3	O

But	O
of	O
course	O
,	O
since	O
they	O
too	O
push	O
political	O
messages	O
for	O
profit	O
(	O
waaah	B-PROP
,	I-PROP
Trump	I-PROP
!	O
)	O

as	O
do	O
all	O
the	O
other	O
corporate	O
media	O
outlets	O
out	O
there	O
,	O
they	O
changed	O
their	O
headline	O
to	O
“	O
Facebook	O
purged	B-PROP
over	I-PROP
800	O
U.S.	O
accounts	O
and	O
pages	O
for	O
pushing	B-PROP
political	I-PROP
spam	I-PROP
.	O
”	O

The	O
fact	O
that	O
many	O
of	O
these	O
accounts	O
were	O
also	O
suspended	O
by	O
Twitter	O
shortly	O
thereafter	O
should	O
tell	O
you	O
that	O
this	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
coordinated	I-PROP
effort	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
silence	I-PROP
large	I-PROP
swaths	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
population	I-PROP
.	O

Of	B-PROP
course	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
best	I-PROP
coverage	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
this	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
from	I-PROP
…	I-PROP
Russia	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

Sputnik	O
News	O
contacted	O
many	O
of	O
the	O
alternative	O
journalists	O
who	O
were	O
purged	O
to	O
get	O
their	O
take	O
on	O
what	O
happened	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
recall	O
that	O
basically	O
every	O
blogger	O
outside	O
the	O
establishment	O
media	O
was	O
accused	O
of	O
being	O
secretly	B-PROP
Russian	I-PROP
during	O
the	O
2016	O
election	O
by	O
the	O
Washington	O
Post	O
,	O
so	O
perhaps	O
actual	O
Russians	O
have	O
a	O
vested	O
interest	O
in	O
the	O
truth	O
coming	O
out	O
on	O
this	O
topic	O
.	O

My	O
friend	O
John	O
Vibes	O
is	O
an	B-PROP
amazing	I-PROP
person	I-PROP
who	O
contributes	O
to	O
The	O
Free	O
Thought	O
Project	O
.	O

He	O
said	O
:	O

This	O
signifies	O
a	O
re	O
-	O
consolidation	O
of	O
the	O
media	O
.	O

Cable	O
news	O
media	O
controlled	O
the	O
narrative	O
for	O
most	O
of	O
modern	O
history	O
,	O
but	O
the	O
internet	O
has	O
lowered	O
that	O
barrier	O
to	O
entry	O
and	O
allowed	O
the	O
average	O
person	O
to	O
become	O
the	O
media	O
themselves	O
.	O

This	O
obviously	O
took	O
market	O
share	O
and	O
influence	O
away	O
from	O
the	O
traditional	O
media	O
,	O
and	O
it	O
has	O
allowed	O
for	O
a	O
more	O
diverse	O
public	O
conversation	O
.	O

Now	O
it	O
seems	O
the	O
platforms	O
that	O
have	O
monopolized	O
the	O
industry	O
are	O
favoring	O
mainstream	O
sources	O
and	O
silencing	O
alternative	O
voices	O
.	O

So	O
now	O
,	O
instead	O
of	O
allowing	O
more	O
people	O
to	O
have	O
a	O
voice	O
,	O
these	O
platforms	O
are	O
creating	O
an	O
atmosphere	O
where	O
only	O
powerful	O
media	O
organizations	O
are	O
welcome	O
,	O
just	O
as	O
we	O
had	O
on	O
cable	O
news	O
.	O

People	O
think	O
that	O
we	O
are	O
just	O
providing	O
an	O
activist	O
spin	O
on	O
the	O
news	O
,	O
but	O
they	O
do	O
n’t	O
see	O
the	O
families	O
struggling	O
to	O
have	O
their	O
voice	O
heard	O
.	O

For	O
example	O
,	O
when	O
someone	O
is	O
shot	O
by	O
police	O
,	O
mainstream	O
media	O
sources	O
often	O
just	O
republish	O
the	O
press	O
release	O
from	O
the	O
police	O
department	O
,	O
without	O
presenting	O
the	O
victim	O
’s	O
side	O
of	O
the	O
story	O
.	O

We	O
give	O
the	O
victims	O
and	O
their	O
families	O
a	O
voice	O
,	O
which	O
is	O
essential	O
to	O
keep	O
power	O
in	O
check	O
.	O

This	O
also	O
goes	O
for	O
bigger	O
issues	O
like	O
foreign	O
policy	O
as	O
well	O
;	O
multiple	O
full	O
-	O
scale	O
invasions	O
of	O
Syria	O
have	O
been	O
prevented	O
because	O
of	O
information	O
that	O
the	O
alternative	O
media	O
made	O
viral	O
.	O

(	O
source	O
)	O

Nicholas	O
Bernabe	O
of	O
The	O
AntiMedia	O
is	O
another	O
alternative	O
journalist	O
I	O
consider	O
a	O
friend	O
and	O
support	O
wholeheartedly	B-PROP
.	O

He	B-PROP
’s	I-PROP
worked	I-PROP
tirelessly	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
voice	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
truth	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
world	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
lies	I-PROP
.	O

He	O
told	O
Sputnik	O
:	O

Our	O
approach	O
generally	O
is	O
to	O
cover	O
stories	O
and	O
angles	O
that	O
corporate	O
media	O
underreport	O
or	O
misreport	O
and	O
to	O
amplify	O
activist	O
and	O
anti	O
-	O
war	O
voices	O
and	O
stories	O
.	O

All	O
of	O
our	O
content	O
is	O
professionally	O
fact	O
-	O
checked	O
and	O
edited	O
.	O

I	O
got	O
into	O
this	O
line	O
of	O
work	O
because	O
I	O
felt	O
there	O
was	O
a	O
need	O
for	O
media	O
that	O
challenged	O
mainstream	O
assumptions	O
and	O
biases	O
in	O
politics	O
.	O

I	O
wanted	O
to	O
shed	O
light	O
on	O
corruption	O
and	O
wrongdoing	O
against	O
oppressed	O
peoples	O
and	O
cover	O
the	O
harsh	B-PROP
truth	O
about	O
American	O
foreign	O
policy	O
.	O

Over	O
the	O
last	O
28	O
days	O
,	O
we	O
reached	O
7,088,000	O
people	O
on	O
Facebook	O
.	O

The	O
timing	O
of	O
this	O
purge	O
is	O
rather	O
dubious	O
in	O
my	O
view	O
,	O
coming	O
shortly	O
before	O
the	O
midterm	O
elections	O
.	O

This	B-PROP
could	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
an	I-PROP
attempt	I-PROP
by	I-PROP
Facebook	I-PROP
itself	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
affect	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
outcome	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
coming	I-PROP
elections	I-PROP
.	O

The	O
Twitter	O
suspension	O
caught	O
me	O
by	O
surprise	O
.	O

I	B-PROP
can	I-PROP
only	I-PROP
speculate	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
these	I-PROP
suspensions	I-PROP
were	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
coordinated	I-PROP
effort	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
stifle	I-PROP
our	I-PROP
message	I-PROP
ahead	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
coming	I-PROP
elections	I-PROP
.	O

(	O
source	O
)	O

Remember	O
,	O
this	O
is	O
coordinated	O
,	O
across	O
multiple	O
platforms	O
.	O

Remember	O
when	O
this	O
happened	O
to	O
Alex	O
Jones	O
?	O

Back	O
in	O
September	O
,	O
an	O
assault	B-PROP
was	O
led	O
by	O
YouTube	O
,	O
Google	O
,	O
and	O
Facebook	O
against	O
Alex	O
Jones	O
of	O
Infowars	O
fame	O
.	O

All	O
of	O
his	O
accounts	O
were	O
shut	O
down	O
in	O
quick	O
succession	O
,	O
followed	O
by	O
his	O
credit	O
card	O
processing	O
companies	O
and	O
his	O
newsletter	O
service	O
providers	O
.	O

I	O
wrote	O
at	O
the	O
time	O
,	O
“	O
Alex	O
Jones	O
is	O
just	O
the	O
beginning	O
of	O
this	O
purge	O
.	O

It	B-PROP
’s	I-PROP
going	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
get	I-PROP
much	I-PROP
worse	I-PROP
.	I-PROP
”	O

Meanwhile	O
,	O
other	O
dissenting	O
voices	O
were	O
being	O
silenced	O
on	O
social	O
media	O
with	O
limited	O
reach	O
and	O
“	O
shadow	O
banning	O
.	O
”	O

Infowars	O
is	O
a	B-PROP
massive	I-PROP
profit	I-PROP
machine	I-PROP
.	O

But	O
what	O
happens	O
when	O
similar	O
attacks	B-PROP
are	O
launched	O
on	O
smaller	O
alternative	O
media	O
outlets	O
?	O

It	O
hits	O
us	O
right	O
in	O
the	O
wallet	O
.	O

And	O
if	O
they	O
’re	O
hit	O
hard	O
enough	O
,	O
they	O
’ll	O
cease	O
to	O
be	O
able	O
to	O
function	O
.	O

Jones	O
has	O
a	O
lot	O
of	O
money	O
so	O
this	O
may	O
not	O
be	O
the	O
end	O
of	O
him	O
,	O
but	O
for	O
most	O
website	O
owners	O
,	O
this	O
would	O
be	O
the	O
absolute	O
end	O
of	O
our	O
ability	O
to	O
do	O
business	O
.	O

And	O
to	O
be	O
able	O
to	O
bring	O
the	O
information	O
we	O
bring	O
,	O
we	O
do	O
have	O
to	O
run	O
our	O
websites	O
as	O
businesses	O
.	O

It	O
’s	O
far	O
more	O
expensive	O
than	O
most	O
people	O
realize	O
to	O
run	O
a	O
site	O
.	O

I	O
know	O
that	O
my	O
own	O
operating	O
costs	O
every	O
month	O
are	O
more	O
than	O
$	O
2000	O
.	O

A	O
site	O
as	O
big	O
as	O
Jones	O
’s	O
would	O
be	O
many	O
times	O
that	O
amount	O
.	O

When	O
all	O
your	O
avenues	O
of	O
monetization	O
are	O
cut	O
off	O
,	O
it	O
would	O
n’t	O
be	O
hard	O
for	O
a	O
site	O
–	O
and	O
the	O
dissent	O
and	O
information	O
they	O
share	O
–	O
to	O
cease	O
to	O
exist	O
.	O

(	O
source	O
)	O

This	O
is	O
not	O
just	O
about	O
Facebook	O
or	O
Twitter	O
.	O

It	O
’s	O
about	O
the	O
ability	O
to	O
find	O
dissenting	O
information	O
,	O
period	O
.	O

Google	O
is	O
in	O
on	O
it	O
too	O
.	O

A	O
leaked	O
document	O
from	O
Google	O
supported	O
the	O
idea	O
of	O
censorship	O
.	O

Another	O
Google	O
document	O
has	O
found	O
its	O
way	O
into	O
the	O
public	O
domain	O
,	O
this	O
time	O
through	O
Breitbart	O
.	O

The	O
news	O
publication	O
reports	O
that	O
an	O
85-page	O
briefing	O
entitled	O
“	O
The	O
Good	O
Censor	O
,	O
”	O
advises	O
tech	O
companies	O
to	O
“	O
police	O
tone	O
instead	O
of	O
content	O
”	O
and	O
to	O
not	O
“	O
take	O
sides	O
”	O
when	O
censoring	O
users	O
…	O
Google	O
might	O
continue	O
to	O
shift	O
with	O
the	O
times	O
–	O
changing	O
its	O
stance	O
on	O
how	O
much	O
or	O
how	O
little	O
it	O
censors	O
(	O
due	O
to	O
public	O
,	O
governmental	O
or	O
commercial	O
pressures	O
)	O
.	O

If	O
it	O
does	O
,	O
acknowledgment	O
of	O
what	O
this	O
shift	O
in	O
position	O
means	O
for	O
users	O
and	O
for	O
Google	O
is	O
essential	O
.	O

Shifting	O
blindly	O
or	O
silently	O
in	O
one	O
direction	O
or	O
another	O
rightly	O
incites	O
users	O
’	O
fury	O
…	O
The	O
Google	O
“	O
internal	O
research	O
”	O
even	O
quotes	O
outside	O
experts	O
like	O
George	O
Soros	O
who	O
express	O
justification	O
of	O
censorship	O
in	O
non	O
-	O
U.S.	O
markets	O
,	O
noting	O
that	O
Google	O
should	O
police	O
“	O
tone	O
instead	O
of	O
content	O
”	O
and	O
“	O
censor	O
everyone	O
equally	O
,	O
”	O
as	O
Breitbart	O
put	O
it	O
.	O

(	O
source	O
)	O

There	O
are	O
2	O
trillion	O
Google	O
searches	O
per	O
day	O
.	O

PER	O
.	O

DAY	O
.	O

That	O
should	O
give	O
you	O
an	O
idea	O
of	O
the	O
power	O
of	O
something	O
like	O
Google	O
.	O

Combine	O
it	O
with	O
billions	O
of	O
Facebook	O
and	O
Twitter	O
users	O
and	O
you	O
can	O
easily	O
see	O
the	O
influence	O
wielded	O
here	O
.	O

This	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
where	I-PROP
free	I-PROP
thought	I-PROP
goes	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
die	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

Ron	O
Paul	O
reminds	O
us	O
that	O
truth	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
treason	I-PROP
.	O

Ron	O
Paul	O
,	O
former	O
senator	O
and	O
the	O
libertarian	B-PROP
voice	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
reason	I-PROP
,	O
said	O
when	O
Jones	O
was	O
purged	O
:	O

“	O
You	O
get	O
accused	O
of	O
treasonous	B-PROP
activity	O
and	O
treasonous	B-PROP
speech	O
because	O
in	B-PROP
an	I-PROP
empire	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
lies	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
truth	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
treason	I-PROP
,	O
”	O
Paul	O
told	O
the	O
Russia	O
-	O
based	O
news	O
outlet	O
.	O

“	O
Challenging	O
the	O
status	O
quo	O
is	O
what	O
they	O
ca	O
n’t	O
stand	O
and	O
it	O
unnerves	O
them	O
,	O
so	O
they	O
have	O
to	O
silence	O
people	O
.	O
”	O
“	O
Some	O
of	O
us	O
tell	O
the	O
truth	O
about	O
our	O
government	O
,	O
they	O
call	O
us	O
treasonous	B-PROP
and	O
say	O
we	O
’re	O
speaking	O
out	O
of	O
line	O
and	O
they	O
’d	O
like	O
to	O
punish	O
us	O
,	O
and	O
I	O
think	O
that	O
’s	O
part	O
of	O
what	O
’s	O
happening	O
with	O
social	O
media	O
,	O
”	O
Paul	O
told	O
RT	O
,	O
adding	O
that	O
he	O
hopes	O
anti	O
-	O
government	O
or	O
anti	O
-	O
war	O
voices	O
can	O
eliminate	O
their	O
“	O
dependency	O
”	O
on	O
the	O
current	O
social	O
media	O
platforms	O
.	O

“	O
I	O
’m	O
just	O
hoping	O
that	O
technology	O
can	O
stay	O
ahead	O
of	O
it	O
all	O
and	O
that	O
we	O
can	O
have	O
real	O
alternatives	O
to	O
the	O
dependency	O
on	O
Twitter	O
and	O
other	O
companies	O
that	O
have	O
been	O
working	O
hand	O
in	O
glove	O
with	O
the	O
government	O
,	O
”	O
Paul	O
added	O
.	O

(	O
source	O
)	O

Here	O
’s	O
a	O
video	O
from	O
last	O
month	O
with	O
Dr.	O
Paul	O
’s	O
thoughts	O
about	O
the	O
social	O
media	O
purge	O
.	O

In	O
it	O
,	O
he	O
reminds	O
us	O
that	O
Facebook	O
is	O
a	O
private	O
entity	O
so	O
they	O
do	O
have	O
every	O
right	O
to	O
remove	O
the	O
pages	O
they	O
wish	O
.	O

The	O
danger	O
–	O
and	O
the	O
area	O
in	O
which	O
this	O
treads	O
on	O
the	O
First	O
Amendment	O
–	O
is	O
their	O
direct	O
ties	O
to	O
the	O
government	O
.	O

This	O
affects	O
everyone	O
.	O

If	O
you	O
’re	O
reading	O
this	O
and	O
you	O
shrug	O
because	O
you	O
,	O
personally	O
,	O
do	O
n’t	O
have	O
a	O
Twitter	O
or	O
Facebook	O
account	O
,	O
you	O
’re	O
missing	B-PROP
the	I-PROP
bigger	I-PROP
point	I-PROP
.	O

Consider	O
the	O
fact	O
that	O
the	O
“	O
population	O
”	O
of	O
Facebook	O
is	O
bigger	O
than	O
the	O
populations	O
of	O
the	O
US	O
,	O
China	O
,	O
and	O
Brazil	O
combined	O
.	O

That	O
’s	O
how	O
many	O
people	O
will	O
now	O
only	O
receive	O
one	O
side	O
of	O
the	O
story	O
on	O
things	O
like	O
war	O
,	O
politics	O
,	O
guns	O
,	O
and	O
current	O
events	O
.	O

People	B-PROP
will	I-PROP
believe	I-PROP
what	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
’re	I-PROP
told	I-PROP
because	I-PROP
there	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
no	I-PROP
alternative	I-PROP
information	I-PROP
presented	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

There	O
are	O
no	O
questions	O
asked	O
.	O

It	O
’s	O
literally	O
the	O
textbook	O
definition	O
of	O
brainwashing	B-PROP
.	O

Definition	O
of	O
brainwashing	B-PROP

1	O
:	O
a	O
forcible	O
indoctrination	B-PROP
to	O
induce	O
someone	O
to	O
give	O
up	O
basic	O
political	O
,	O
social	O
,	O
or	O
religious	O
beliefs	O
and	O
attitudes	O
and	O
to	O
accept	O
contrasting	O
regimented	O
ideas	O
2	O
:	O
persuasion	O
by	O
propaganda	O
or	O
salesmanship	O
(	O
source	O
)	O

(	O
Here	O
’s	O
an	O
article	O
from	O
Psychology	O
Today	O
that	O
discusses	O
how	O
Facebook	O
is	O
,	O
in	O
fact	O
,	O
brainwashing	B-PROP
people	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
profit	I-PROP
.	O
)	O

Social	O
media	O
is	O
a	O
massive	O
source	O
of	O
information	O
and	O
influence	O
today	O
.	O

If	B-PROP
the	I-PROP
information	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
rigged	I-PROP
by	I-PROP
entities	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
support	I-PROP
socialism	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
gun	I-PROP
control	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
end	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
privacy	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
we	I-PROP
’re	I-PROP
doomed	I-PROP
.	O

2.2	O
billion	O
active	O
users	O
will	O
be	O
bombarded	B-PROP
with	O
these	O
messages	O
without	O
any	O
real	O
option	O
for	O
the	O
other	O
side	O
of	O
the	O
story	O
.	O

So	O
regardless	O
of	O
whether	O
you	O
,	O
personally	O
,	O
participate	O
,	O
this	O
will	O
color	O
popular	O
sentiment	O
to	B-PROP
a	I-PROP
massive	I-PROP
degree	I-PROP
.	O

It	O
will	O
grow	O
the	O
cognitive	O
dissonance	O
that	O
assures	O
people	O
of	O
things	O
like	O
“	O
the	B-PROP
government	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
your	I-PROP
friend	I-PROP
”	O
and	O
that	O
“	O
you	O
do	O
n’t	O
need	O
to	O
protect	O
yourself	O
,	O
the	O
police	O
will	O
take	O
care	O
of	O
you	O
.	O
”	O

People	B-PROP
who	I-PROP
hate	I-PROP
freedom	I-PROP
will	I-PROP
get	I-PROP
unfettered	I-PROP
access	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
minds	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
2	I-PROP
billion	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
.	O

That	B-PROP
should	I-PROP
scare	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
crap	I-PROP
out	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
you	I-PROP
.	O

What	O
can	O
you	O
do	O
about	O
the	O
alternative	B-PROP
media	I-PROP
purge	I-PROP
?	O

It	O
’s	O
possible	O
but	O
unlikely	O
that	O
social	O
pressure	O
on	O
Facebook	O
and	O
Twitter	O
will	O
push	O
the	O
outlets	O
into	O
restoring	O
the	O
accounts	O
of	O
these	O
alternative	O
media	O
networks	O
.	O

But	O
even	O
if	O
they	O
are	O
restored	O
,	O
I	O
suspect	O
their	O
reach	O
will	O
dwindle	O
even	O
further	O
.	O

Here	O
are	O
a	O
few	O
things	O
you	O
can	O
do	O
:	O

Subscribe	O
to	O
the	O
newsletters	O
of	O
websites	O
you	O
enjoy	O
.	O

Do	O
n’t	O
count	O
on	O
seeing	O
their	O
work	O
on	O
social	O
media	O
.	O

(	O
You	O
can	O
subscribe	O
to	O
my	O
newsletter	O
here	O
,	O
incidentally	O
.	O
)	O

Support	O
them	O
financially	O
if	O
you	O
can	O
.	O

Many	O
sites	O
have	O
Patreon	O
accounts	O
or	O
donate	O
buttons	O

Bookmark	O
them	O
and	O
visit	O
regularly	O
–	O
if	O
they	O
have	O
ads	O
,	O
your	O
visits	O
help	O
them	O
to	O
make	O
the	O
money	O
they	O
need	O
to	O
stay	O
afloat	O
.	O

Share	O
their	O
articles	O
on	O
your	O
own	O
social	O
media	O
accounts	O
.	O

If	O
they	O
ca	O
n’t	O
get	O
their	O
work	O
out	O
there	O
,	O
we	O
can	O
help	O
.	O

Join	O
alternative	O
social	O
media	O
outlets	O
like	O
Gab	O
and	O
MeWe	O
.	O

The	O
truth	O
is	O
getting	O
harder	O
and	O
harder	O
to	O
find	O
.	O

You	O
’re	O
going	O
to	O
have	O
to	O
dig	O
for	O
it	O
.	O

We	O
’re	O
watching	O
the	B-PROP
biggest	I-PROP
campaign	I-PROP
against	I-PROP
freedom	O
of	O
speech	O
and	O
thought	O
that	O
has	O
ever	O
occurred	O
in	O
our	O
part	O
of	O
the	O
world	O
.	O

The	O
alternative	O
media	O
purge	B-PROP
is	O
just	O
the	O
beginning	O
.	O

And	O
we	O
should	O
all	O
be	O
very	O
concerned	O
.	O

Article	O
posted	O
with	O
permission	O
from	O
Daisy	O
Luther	O

First	O
They	O
Came	O
for	O
Alex	O
Jones	O
—	O
We	O
Told	O
You	O
We	O
Were	O
Next	O
—	O
We	O
Were	O

October	O
11	O
,	O
2018	O
,	O
will	O
be	O
remembered	O
in	O
history	O
as	O
the	O
day	O
the	B-PROP
tech	I-PROP
giants	I-PROP
attempted	O
to	O
wipe	B-PROP
out	I-PROP
independent	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
liberty	I-PROP
-	I-PROP
minded	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
antiwar	I-PROP
media	I-PROP
from	O
the	O
airwaves	O
.	O

On	O
Thursday	O
,	O
in	O
a	O
coordinated	O
effort	O
,	O
hundreds	O
of	O
pages	O
devoted	O
to	O
peace	O
and	O
liberty	O
were	O
memory	B-PROP
-	I-PROP
holed	I-PROP
by	O
social	B-PROP
media	I-PROP
giants	I-PROP
.	O

As	O
part	O
of	O
its	O
purge	O
,	O
Facebook	O
has	O
removed	O
the	O
pages	O
of	O
several	O
police	O
accountability	O
/	O
watchdog	O
/	O
critic	O
groups	O
,	O
including	O
Cop	O
Block	O
,	O
the	O
Free	O
Thought	O
Project	O
,	O
and	O
Police	O
the	O
Police	O
.	O

They	O
've	O
also	O
apparently	O
severely	B-PROP
restricted	O
activity	O
for	O
the	O
Photography	O
Is	O
Not	O
a	O
Crime	O
page	O
.	O

—	O
Radley	O
Balko	O
(	O
@radleybalko	O
)	O
October	O
12	O
,	O
2018	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

Who	O
should	O
replace	O
Nikki	O
Haley	O
as	O
our	O
ambassador	O
to	O
the	O
U.N.	O
?	O

*	O
John	O
Bolton	O
Richard	O
Grenell	O
Dina	O
Powell	O
Heather	O
Nauert	O
Ivanka	O
Trump	O

Email	O
*	O

Comments	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Freedom	O
Outpost	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

What	O
makes	O
this	O
recent	O
purge	O
from	O
Facebook	O
and	O
Twitter	O
so	O
egregious	O
is	O
that	O
the	O
pages	O
like	O
the	O
Free	O
Thought	O
Project	O
,	O
the	O
Anti	O
-	O
Media	O
,	O
Press	O
for	O
Truth	O
,	O
and	O
dozens	O
of	O
others	O
,	O
did	O
not	O
fit	O
the	O
hate	O
speech	O
narrative	O
these	O
same	O
companies	O
used	O
to	O
wipe	B-PROP
out	I-PROP
Alex	O
Jones	O
.	O

Instead	O
,	O
these	O
pages	O
were	O
dedicated	O
to	O
spreading	O
peace	O
,	O
bridging	O
the	O
divide	O
,	O
bringing	O
humanity	O
together	O
and	O
holding	O
government	O
accountable	O
.	O

And	O
how	O
does	O
this	O
poem	O
end	O
,	O
again	O
?	O

https://t.co/nUZ82x9JFt	O
—	O
Anya	O
Parampil	O
(	O
@anyaparampil	O
)	O
August	O
6	O
,	O
2018	O

The	O
purge	O
happened	O
around	O
12:30	O
p.m.	O
CST	O
with	O
mainstream	O
news	O
reports	O
launching	O
at	O
the	O
same	O
time	O
—	O
implying	O
that	O
they	O
were	O
given	O
the	O
heads	O
up	O
about	O
the	O
move	O
.	O

In	O
a	O
statement	O
co	O
-	O
authored	O
by	O
Facebook	O
Head	O
of	O
Cybersecurity	O
Nathaniel	O
Gleicher	O
—	O
who	O
Caitlin	O
Johnstone	O
aptly	O
points	O
out	O
,	O
also	O
happens	O
to	O
be	O
the	O
former	O
White	O
House	O
National	O
Security	O
Council	O
Director	O
of	O
Cybersecurity	O
Policy	O
—	O
the	O
massive	O
social	O
media	O
platform	O
explained	O
that	O
it	O
has	O
removed	O
“	O
559	O
Pages	O
and	O
251	O
accounts	O
that	O
have	O
consistently	O
broken	O
our	O
rules	O
against	O
spam	O
and	O
coordinated	O
inauthentic	O
behavior	O
.	O
”	O

Facebook	O
said	O
the	O
pages	O
were	O
“	O
working	O
to	O
mislead	O
others	O
about	O
who	O
they	O
are	O
,	O
and	O
what	O
they	O
are	O
doing	O
.	O
”	O
However	B-PROP
,	O
this	B-PROP
could	I-PROP
n’t	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
further	I-PROP
from	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
truth	I-PROP
.	O

Our	O
names	O
,	O
addresses	O
,	O
and	O
phone	O
numbers	O
were	O
on	O
all	O
of	O
our	O
pages	O
and	O
our	O
profiles	O
.	O

“	O
We	O
were	O
verified	O
by	O
Facebook	O
with	O
a	O
little	O
check	O
mark	O
next	O
to	O
our	O
name	O
,	O
so	O
they	O
know	O
we	O
are	O
a	O
legitimate	O
organization	O
/	O
outlet	O
.	O

They	O
have	O
seen	O
our	O
“	O
Articles	O
of	O
Organization	O
”	O
which	O
was	O
issued	O
by	O
the	O
state	O
of	O
Louisiana	O
,	O
which	O
is	O
where	O
my	O
partner	O
and	O
The	O
Free	O
Thought	O
Project	O
co	O
-	O
founder	O
lives	O
,	O
”	O
Jason	O
Bassler	O
,	O
co	O
-	O
founder	O
of	O
the	O
Free	O
Thought	O
Project	O
explained	O
.	O

However	O
,	O
in	O
their	O
statement	O
,	O
Facebook	O
then	O
suggested	O
the	O
real	O
reason	O
behind	O
the	O
purge	O
—	O
elections	O
are	O
coming	O
—	O
and	O
pesky	B-PROP
folks	I-PROP
like	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
independent	I-PROP
media	I-PROP
have	O
a	O
way	O
of	O
reporting	O
information	O
on	O
candidates	O
that	O
the	O
mainstream	O
tends	O
to	O
ignore	O
—	O
like	O
war	O
,	O
corruption	O
,	O
and	O
most	O
recently	O
,	O
Brett	O
Kavanaugh	O
’s	O
disdain	O
for	O
the	O
Constitution	O
.	O

“	O
Given	O
the	O
activity	O
we	O
’ve	O
seen	O
—	O
and	O
its	O
timing	O
ahead	O
of	O
the	O
US	O
midterm	O
elections	O
—	O
we	O
wanted	O
to	O
give	O
some	O
details	O
about	O
the	O
types	O
of	O
behavior	O
that	O
led	O
to	O
this	O
action	O
,	O
”	O
Facebook	O
said	O
,	O
before	O
accusing	O
us	O
of	O
hawking	O
fake	O
products	O
or	O
functioning	O
as	O
ad	O
farms	O
that	O
tricked	O
“	O
people	O
into	O
thinking	O
that	O
they	O
were	O
forums	O
for	O
legitimate	O
political	O
debate	O
.	O
”	O

It	O
should	O
be	O
stated	O
that	O
TFTP	O
never	O
hid	O
the	O
fact	O
that	O
we	O
worked	O
with	O
other	O
independent	O
media	O
groups	O
to	O
share	O
our	O
information	O
around	O
the	O
web	O
—	O
this	O
is	O
the	O
very	O
definition	O
of	O
grassroots	B-PROP
.	O

But	O
all	O
of	O
us	O
together	O
certainly	O
posed	O
a	O
threat	O
to	O
the	O
mainstream	O
so	O
this	O
nonsense	B-PROP
about	O
tricking	O
people	O
was	O
brought	O
into	O
play	O
.	O

Within	O
all	O
of	O
our	O
pages	O
under	O
the	O
Free	O
Thought	O
umbrella	O
,	O
we	O
had	O
close	O
to	O
6	O
million	O
followers	O
.	O

Does	B-PROP
Facebook	I-PROP
think	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
knows	I-PROP
better	I-PROP
than	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
6	I-PROP
million	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
who	I-PROP
clicked	I-PROP
like	I-PROP
on	I-PROP
our	I-PROP
page	I-PROP
?	I-PROP

We	O
also	O
had	O
close	O
to	O
16,000	O
reviews	O
on	O
our	O
page	O
with	O
an	O
average	O
4.1	O
star	O
rating	O
,	O
directly	O
showing	O
that	O
people	O
desired	O
to	O
see	O
what	O
we	O
were	O
putting	O
out	O
.	O

The	O
only	O
ones	O
manipulating	O
people	O
here	O
are	O
the	O
tech	B-PROP
giants	I-PROP
themselves	O
.	O

All	O
but	O
proving	O
the	O
case	O
that	O
this	O
was	O
a	O
coordinated	O
attack	O
by	O
the	O
tech	O
giant	O
community	O
,	O
shortly	O
after	O
the	O
purge	O
on	O
Facebook	O
,	O
Twitter	O
followed	O
suit	O
,	O
wiping	B-PROP
out	O
our	O
profiles	O
on	O
there	O
as	O
well	O
.	O

They	B-PROP
gave	I-PROP
absolutely	I-PROP
no	I-PROP
reason	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
suspension	I-PROP
.	O

“	O
This	O
signifies	O
a	O
re	O
-	O
consolidation	O
of	O
the	O
media	O
.	O

Cable	O
news	O
media	O
controlled	O
the	O
narrative	O
for	O
most	O
of	O
modern	O
history	O
,	O
but	O
the	O
internet	O
has	O
lowered	O
that	O
barrier	O
to	O
entry	O
and	O
allowed	O
the	O
average	O
person	O
to	O
become	O
the	O
media	O
themselves	O
.	O

This	O
obviously	O
took	O
market	O
share	O
and	O
influence	O
away	O
from	O
the	O
traditional	O
media	O
,	O
and	O
it	O
has	O
allowed	O
for	O
a	O
more	O
diverse	O
public	O
conversation	O
.	O

Now	O
it	O
seems	O
the	O
platforms	O
that	O
have	O
monopolized	O
the	O
industry	O
are	O
favoring	O
mainstream	O
sources	O
and	O
silencing	O
alternative	O
voices	O
.	O

So	O
now	O
,	O
instead	O
of	O
allowing	O
more	O
people	O
to	O
have	O
a	O
voice	O
,	O
these	O
platforms	O
are	O
creating	O
an	O
atmosphere	O
where	O
only	O
powerful	O
media	O
organizations	O
are	O
welcome	O
,	O
just	O
as	O
we	O
had	O
on	O
cable	O
news	O
,	O
”	O
John	O
Vibes	O
poignantly	O
noted	O
.	O

The	O
bottom	O
line	O
is	O
that	O
sites	O
like	O
ours	O
and	O
the	O
others	O
who	O
were	O
wiped	O
from	O
the	O
internet	O
yesterday	O
represent	O
a	O
voice	O
against	O
the	O
plutocratic	B-PROP
information	I-PROP
-	I-PROP
controlling	I-PROP
establishment	I-PROP
.	O

We	O
challenge	O
their	O
paradigm	O
of	O
control	O
and	O
this	O
is	O
a	O
thorn	B-PROP
in	I-PROP
their	I-PROP
side	I-PROP
.	O

There	O
are	O
no	O
longer	O
distinct	O
lines	O
between	O
social	O
media	O
giants	O
and	O
government	O
either	O
which	O
renders	O
the	O
“	O
they	B-PROP
are	I-PROP
private	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
can	I-PROP
do	I-PROP
what	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
wish	I-PROP
”	O
argument	O
moot	O
.	O

Facebook	O
has	O
been	O
partnering	O
with	O
the	O
Digital	O
Forensics	O
Lab	O
,	O
an	O
arm	O
of	O
the	O
Atlantic	O
Council	O
think	O
tank	O
—	O
a	O
neoconservative	O
group	O
funded	O
by	O
Gulf	O
monarchies	O
,	O
defense	O
giants	O
like	O
Raytheon	O
,	O
megabanks	O
like	O
HSBC	O
,	O
foreign	O
state	O
actors	O
,	O
and	O
the	O
US	O
government	O
—	O
to	O
weed	O
out	O
people	O
like	O
us	O
who	O
challenge	O
the	O
status	O
quo	O
.	O

The	O
entity	O
that	O
is	O
making	O
censorship	O
decisions	O
for	O
Facebook	O
,	O
as	O
publicly	O
announced	O
,	O
is	O
the	O
Atlantic	O
Council	O
,	O
a	O
partly	O
US	O
government	O
-	O
funded	O
entity	O
.	O

At	O
what	O
point	O
will	O
the	O
extremely	O
tight	O
ties	O
between	O
these	O
companies	O
and	O
the	O
US	O
government	O
end	O
the	O
"	O
they	O
are	O
private	O
"	O
argument	O
?	O

—	O
Daniel	O
McAdams	O
(	O
@DanielLMcAdams	O
)	O
October	O
12	O
,	O
2018	O

Serving	O
as	O
a	O
kick	B-PROP
in	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
teeth	I-PROP
to	O
the	O
thousands	O
of	O
people	O
who	O
lost	O
their	O
livelihoods	O
yesterday	O
because	O
of	O
this	O
purge	O
is	O
the	O
fact	O
that	O
pages	O
who	B-PROP
do	I-PROP
set	I-PROP
out	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
deliberately	I-PROP
deceive	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
put	I-PROP
out	I-PROP
actual	I-PROP
fake	I-PROP
news	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
slander	I-PROP
others	I-PROP
—	O
like	O
the	O
infamous	O
Your	O
News	O
Wire	O
—	O
remain	O
intact	O
and	O
able	O
to	O
post	O
.	O

No	O
,	O
we	O
are	O
not	O
calling	O
for	O
these	O
fake	O
pages	O
to	O
be	O
removed	O
,	O
but	O
instead	O
using	O
it	O
as	O
a	O
point	O
of	O
reference	O
as	O
to	O
why	O
they	O
targeted	O
us	O
when	O
pages	O
like	O
YNW	O
have	O
become	O
famous	O
for	O
spreading	O
lies	O
and	O
deceiving	O
people	O
.	O

Those	O
who	O
demanded	O
Facebook	O
&	O
other	O
Silicon	B-PROP
Valley	I-PROP
giants	I-PROP
censor	O
political	O
content	O
-	O
something	O
they	O
did	O
n't	O
actually	O
want	O
to	O
do	O
-	O
are	O
finding	O
that	O
content	O
that	O
they	O
themselves	O
support	O
&	O
like	O
end	O
up	O
being	O
repressed	O
.	O

That	B-PROP
's	I-PROP
what	I-PROP
has	I-PROP
happened	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
every	I-PROP
censorship	I-PROP
advocate	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
history	I-PROP
:	O
https://t.co/IZHF8GVkgC	O
—	O
Glenn	O
Greenwald	O
(	O
@ggreenwald	O
)	O
October	O
12	O
,	O
2018	O

Indeed	O
,	O
we	O
have	O
reached	O
the	O
precipice	O
of	O
corporate	O
-	O
state	O
censorship	O
.	O

Those	O
who	O
have	O
constantly	O
demanded	O
that	O
tech	O
giants	O
silence	O
their	O
critics	O
and	O
information	O
that	O
‘	O
offends	O
’	O
them	O
are	O
finally	O
seeing	O
the	O
inevitable	O
results	O
of	O
such	O
irresponsible	O
acts	O
.	O

As	O
we	O
have	O
been	O
pointing	O
out	O
for	O
the	O
last	O
two	O
years	O
,	O
tech	O
monopolies	O
large	O
enough	O
to	O
silence	O
those	O
with	O
whom	O
you	O
disagree	O
,	O
are	O
large	O
enough	O
to	O
one	O
day	O
silence	O
you	O
.	O

The	O
silver	O
lining	O
to	O
this	O
massive	B-PROP
purge	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
independent	I-PROP
media	I-PROP
is	O
that	O
it	O
signals	O
the	O
beginning	O
of	O
the	O
end	O
of	O
censored	O
media	O
.	O

TFTP	O
has	O
been	O
planning	O
for	O
this	O
day	O
and	O
we	O
have	O
been	O
growing	O
our	O
email	O
list	O
and	O
our	O
subscriber	O
base	O
.	O

We	B-PROP
will	I-PROP
not	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
silenced	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

While	O
it	O
may	O
seem	O
bleak	O
for	O
now	O
,	O
we	O
will	O
rise	O
from	O
the	O
ashes	O
of	O
the	O
social	B-PROP
media	I-PROP
dinosaurs	I-PROP
to	O
help	O
build	O
and	O
create	O
new	O
platforms	O
that	O
are	O
out	O
of	O
their	O
control	O
where	O
ideas	O
of	O
peace	O
and	O
freedom	O
can	O
be	O
discussed	O
openly	O
without	O
fear	O
of	O
devoting	O
years	O
to	O
a	O
platform	O
that	O
can	B-PROP
disappear	I-PROP
you	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
blink	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
an	I-PROP
eye	I-PROP
.	O

If	O
you	O
are	O
not	O
on	O
our	O
email	O
list	O
,	O
please	O
sign	O
up	O
here	O
.	O

If	O
you	O
’d	O
like	O
to	O
subscribe	O
to	O
our	O
site	O
to	O
aid	O
in	O
the	O
battle	O
against	O
the	O
censors	O
and	O
receive	O
special	O
perks	O
along	O
the	O
way	O
,	O
you	O
can	O
do	O
so	O
at	O
this	O
link	O
.	O

We	O
are	O
also	O
working	O
with	O
the	O
folks	O
from	O
minds.com	O
and	O
have	O
created	O
a	O
platform	O
on	O
their	O
uncensored	O
network	O
as	O
well	O
.	O

You	O
can	O
follow	O
us	O
at	O
this	O
link	O
.	O

We	O
have	O
been	O
on	O
Steemit	O
as	O
well	O
.	O

And	O
Instagram	O
too	O
.	O

Article	O
posted	O
with	O
permission	O
from	O
The	O
Free	O
Thought	O
Project	O

More	O
Independent	O
Media	O
To	O
Be	O
Shut	O
Down	O

The	O
very	O
word	O
“	O
secrecy	O
”	O
is	O
repugnant	O
in	O
a	O
free	O
and	O
open	O
society	O
;	O
and	O
we	O
are	O
as	O
a	O
people	O
inherently	O
and	O
historically	O
opposed	O
to	O
secret	O
societies	O
,	O
to	O
secret	O
oaths	O
and	O
to	O
secret	O
proceedings	O
.	O

We	O
decided	O
long	O
ago	O
that	O
the	O
dangers	O
of	O
excessive	O
and	O
unwarranted	O
concealment	O
of	O
pertinent	O
facts	O
far	O
outweighed	O
the	O
dangers	O
which	O
are	O
cited	O
to	O
justify	O
it	O
.	O

Even	O
today	O
,	O
there	O
is	O
little	O
value	O
in	O
opposing	O
the	O
threat	O
of	O
a	O
closed	O
society	O
by	O
imitating	O
its	O
arbitrary	O
restrictions	O
.	O

Even	O
today	O
,	O
there	O
is	O
little	O
value	O
in	O
insuring	O
the	O
survival	O
of	O
our	O
nation	O
if	O
our	O
traditions	O
do	O
not	O
survive	O
with	O
it	O
.	O

And	O
there	O
is	O
very	B-PROP
grave	I-PROP
danger	I-PROP
that	O
an	O
announced	O
need	O
for	O
increased	O
security	O
will	O
be	O
seized	O
upon	O
by	O
those	O
anxious	O
to	O
expand	O
its	O
meaning	O
to	O
the	O
very	O
limits	O
of	O
official	O
censorship	O
and	O
concealment	O
.	O

–	O
JFK	O

If	O
you	O
have	O
n’t	O
already	O
heard	O
,	O
Facebook	O
has	O
completely	O
shut	O
down	O
hundreds	O
,	O
if	O
not	O
thousands	O
of	O
Independent	O
media	O
pages	O
over	O
the	O
last	O
year	O
.	O

Some	O
of	O
the	O
biggest	O
pages	O
include	O
The	O
Free	O
Thought	O
Project	O
and	O
The	O
Anti	O
-	O
media	O
,	O
with	O
millions	O
of	O
followers	O
each	O
,	O
and	O
years	O
of	O
sourced	O
journalism	O
.	O

These	O
pages	O
,	O
among	O
others	O
,	O
became	O
targets	O
a	O
long	O
time	O
ago	O
.	O

Working	O
directly	O
in	O
the	O
field	O
and	O
behind	O
the	O
scenes	O
,	O
I	O
can	O
tell	O
you	O
that	O
all	O
of	O
us	O
have	O
been	O
aware	O
of	O
the	O
censorship	O
initiative	O
for	O
a	O
long	O
time	O
because	O
it	O
started	O
approximately	O
three	O
years	O
ago	O
now	O
.	O

The	O
complete	O
deletion	O
of	O
multiple	O
pages	O
kicked	O
off	O
by	O
popular	O
media	O
figure	O
Alex	O
Jones	O
,	O
was	O
followed	O
by	O
a	O
massive	O
campaign	O
of	O
“	O
fake	B-PROP
news	I-PROP
”	O
awareness	O
.	O

One	O
thing	O
we	O
need	O
to	O
remember	O
here	O
is	O
,	O
this	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
n’t	I-PROP
about	I-PROP
democrats	I-PROP
vs	I-PROP
republicans	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
’s	I-PROP
about	I-PROP
the	B-PROP
elite	I-PROP
preserving	I-PROP
their	I-PROP
control	I-PROP
,	O
and	O
at	O
the	O
moment	O
,	O
they	O
are	O
using	O
the	O
DNC	O
as	O
the	O
mouthpiece	O
for	O
that	O
.	O

Thus	O
,	O
anything	O
that	O
slandered	O
Hillary	O
Clinton	O
during	O
the	O
presidential	O
campaign	O
,	O
for	O
example	O
,	O
was	O
labelled	O
as	O
fake	O
news	O
,	O
even	O
if	O
evidence	O
and	O
credible	O
sources	O
were	O
used	O
.	O

This	O
is	O
because	O
she	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
part	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
elite	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

This	O
is	O
cyber	B-PROP
false	I-PROP
flagging	I-PROP
at	I-PROP
its	I-PROP
finest	I-PROP
,	O
where	O
authority	O
figures	O
at	O
Facebook	O
and	O
within	O
government	O
agencies	O
decide	O
for	O
the	O
people	O
what	O
is	O
real	O
,	O
and	O
what	O
is	O
not	O
,	O
These	O
tactics	O
are	O
complemented	O
by	O
a	O
large	O
mainstream	O
media	O
campaign	O
that	O
created	O
awareness	O
about	O
fake	O
news	O
.	O

Monkey	B-PROP
see	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
monkey	I-PROP
do	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

With	O
Liberty	O
and	O
Justi	O
...	O
Glenn	O
Greenwald	O
Best	O
Price	O
:	O
$	O
2.66	O
Buy	O
New	O
$	O
11.34	O
(	O
as	O
of	O
02:05	O
EST	O
-	O
Details	O
)	O

Many	O
believed	O
what	O
media	O
and	O
social	O
media	O
did	O
during	O
that	O
election	O
,	O
and	O
still	O
now	O
,	O
and	O
take	O
on	O
the	O
opinion	O
that	O
people	O
can	O
not	O
just	O
say	O
what	O
they	O
want	O
on	O
the	O
internet	O
.	O

This	O
has	O
some	O
validity	O
,	O
but	O
ultimately	O
,	O
the	O
fact	O
that	O
Facebook	O
pages	O
with	O
credibility	O
were	O
deleted	O
makes	O
it	O
quite	O
clear	O
what	O
’s	O
going	O
on	O
here	O
.	O

These	O
pages	O
presented	O
declassified	O
documents	O
,	O
information	O
about	O
corporations	O
and	O
mainstream	O
media	O
,	O
real	O
whistleblower	O
testimony	O
and	O
more	O
.	O

Yet	O
still	O
,	O
they	O
were	O
deleted	O
.	O

The	O
population	O
should	O
be	O
able	O
to	O
examine	O
a	O
source	O
of	O
information	O
and	O
determine	O
for	O
themselves	O
if	O
it	O
’s	O
credible	O
,	O
not	O
have	O
an	O
authority	O
figure	O
do	O
it	O
for	O
them	O
.	O

We	B-PROP
do	I-PROP
n’t	I-PROP
need	I-PROP
fact	I-PROP
checkers	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
we	I-PROP
ourselves	I-PROP
should	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
those	I-PROP
fact	I-PROP
checkers	I-PROP
!	O

We	B-PROP
have	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
responsibility	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
our	I-PROP
planet	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
those	I-PROP
fact	I-PROP
checkers	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
not	I-PROP
let	I-PROP
authority	I-PROP
figures	I-PROP
with	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
tremendous	I-PROP
amount	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
power	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
wealth	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
conflicts	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
interests	I-PROP
do	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
us	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

“	O
The	O
problem	O
of	O
fake	O
news	O
is	O
n’t	O
solved	O
by	O
hoping	O
for	O
a	O
referee	O
,	O
but	O
rather	O
because	O
we	O
as	O
citizens	O
,	O
we	O
as	O
users	O
of	O
these	O
services	O
,	O
help	O
each	O
other	O
.	O

We	O
talk	O
and	O
we	O
share	O
and	O
we	O
point	O
out	O
what	O
is	O
fake	O
.	O

We	O
point	O
out	O
what	O
is	O
true	O
.	O

The	O
answer	O
to	O
bad	O
speech	O
is	O
not	O
censorship	O
,	O
the	B-PROP
answer	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
bad	I-PROP
speech	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
more	I-PROP
speech	I-PROP
.	O

We	B-PROP
have	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
exercise	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
spread	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
idea	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
critical	I-PROP
thinking	I-PROP
matters	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
now	I-PROP
more	I-PROP
than	I-PROP
ever	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
given	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
fact	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
lies	I-PROP
seem	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
getting	I-PROP
more	I-PROP
popular	I-PROP
.	O
”	O
–	O
Edward	O
Snowden	O
(	O
source	O
)	O

Facebook	O
A	O
Revolving	O
Door	O

Facebook	O
has	O
become	O
a	O
revolving	O
door	O
like	O
Monsanto	O
,	O
with	O
high	O
-	O
ranking	O
DARPA	O
employees	O
,	O
like	O
Regina	O
Duggan	O
,	O
who	O
has	O
since	O
left	O
Facebook	O
,	O
and	O
people	O
from	O
similar	O
backgrounds	O
now	O
spearheading	O
their	O
mission	O
.	O

What	O
is	O
Facebook	O
’s	O
mission	O
?	O

Well	O
at	O
the	O
moment	O
it	O
seems	O
to	O
be	O
censoring	O
of	O
information	O
.	O

Their	O
key	O
strategy	O
is	O
to	O
label	O
everything	O
as	O
fake	O
news	O
to	O
build	O
an	O
excuse	O
to	O
delete	O
Facebook	O
pages	O
that	O
are	O
dissenting	O
voices	O
.	O

You	O
see	O
,	O
independent	O
media	O
,	O
like	O
CE	O
,	O
became	O
extremely	B-PROP
popular	O
,	O
receiving	O
many	O
millions	O
in	O
website	O
every	O
single	O
month	O
,	O
that	O
traffic	O
came	O
from	O
Facebook	O
.	O

Independent	O
media	O
outlets	O
were	O
greatly	O
surpassing	O
mainstream	O
media	O
in	O
their	O
power	O
and	O
voice	O
.	O

This	O
is	O
something	O
people	O
on	O
the	O
outside	O
ca	O
n’t	O
really	O
see	O
as	O
all	O
of	O
this	O
happens	O
,	O
but	O
I	O
am	O
on	O
the	O
inside	O
,	O
so	O
I	O
see	O
exactly	O
what	O
’s	O
taking	O
place	O
.	O

Eyes	O
were	O
shifting	O
away	O
from	O
the	O
small	O
group	O
of	O
people	O
who	O
have	O
controlled	O
media	O
since	O
media	O
’s	O
inception	O
.	O

Independent	O
media	O
brought	O
to	O
light	O
a	O
number	O
of	O
facts	O
that	O
threaten	O
the	O
agenda	O
of	O
the	B-PROP
global	I-PROP
elite	I-PROP
,	O
like	O
intelligence	O
agency	O
/	O
government	O
connections	O
to	O
mainstream	O
media	O
for	O
example	O
,	O
and	O
their	O
plans	O
in	O
the	O
middle	O
east	O
to	O
basically	O
invade	O
,	O
take	O
-	O
over	O
,	O
and	O
establish	O
a	O
government	O
that	O
suits	O
the	B-PROP
Deep	I-PROP
State	I-PROP
’s	I-PROP
best	I-PROP
interests	I-PROP
.	O

There	O
are	O
several	O
examples	O
from	O
all	O
fields	O
that	O
surround	O
human	O
life	O
,	O
from	O
healthcare	O
to	O
politics	O
,	O
and	O
it	O
all	O
seems	O
to	O
be	O
controlled	O
by	O
one	O
massive	O
conglomerate	O
at	O
the	O
top	O
.	O

We	O
’ve	O
been	O
writing	O
about	O
this	O
for	O
nearly	O
a	O
decade	O
now	O
.	O

The	B-PROP
Deep	I-PROP
State	I-PROP
Has	I-PROP
Power	I-PROP
Due	I-PROP
To	I-PROP
Our	I-PROP
Unconsciousness	I-PROP

They	O
(	O
global	O
elite	O
)	O
continue	O
to	O
do	O
what	O
they	O
are	O
able	O
to	O
do	O
because	O
of	O
human	O
consciousness	O
.	O

The	B-PROP
more	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
who	I-PROP
consider	I-PROP
this	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
“	I-PROP
conspiracy	I-PROP
theory	I-PROP
”	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
turn	I-PROP
their	I-PROP
heads	I-PROP
away	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
easier	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
them	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
continue	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
have	I-PROP
power	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

I	B-PROP
do	I-PROP
n’t	I-PROP
understand	I-PROP
how	I-PROP
so	I-PROP
much	I-PROP
information	I-PROP
can	I-PROP
come	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
light	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
yet	I-PROP
when	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
’s	I-PROP
deemed	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
“	I-PROP
conspiracy	I-PROP
”	I-PROP
theory	I-PROP
”	I-PROP
within	I-PROP
mainstream	I-PROP
media	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
everybody	I-PROP
simply	I-PROP
follows	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
rhetoric	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
without	O
doing	O
any	O
investigation	O
or	O
research	O
for	O
themselves	O
.	O

If	O
you	O
do	O
n’t	O
look	O
into	O
it	O
,	O
do	O
n’t	O
share	O
an	O
opinion	O
on	O
it	O
.	O

“	O
Condemnation	B-PROP
without	I-PROP
investigation	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
height	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
ignorance	I-PROP
.	O
”	O
–	O
Einstein	O
.	O

All	O
of	O
these	O
media	O
sources	O
were	O
operating	O
normally	O
until	O
Donald	O
Trump	O
became	O
president	O
,	O
and	O
until	O
Hillary	O
Clinton	O
,	O
Obama	O
,	O
Bush	O
,	O
etc	O
were	O
outed	O
as	O
global	B-PROP
elite	I-PROP
puppets	I-PROP
.	O

Heck	O
,	O
the	O
Clinton	O
’s	O
and	O
John	O
Podesta	O
have	O
even	O
referenced	O
Wikileaks	O
before	O
that	O
became	O
‘	O
fake	O
.	O
’	O
Despite	O
operating	O
with	O
credibility	O
for	O
more	O
than	O
a	O
decade	O
before	O
the	O
accusations	O
.	O

What	O
does	O
the	O
media	O
operating	O
normally	O
mean	O
?	O

Still	O
manipulating	O
the	O
public	O
,	O
but	O
at	O
least	O
they	O
were	O
reporting	O
on	O
both	O
sides	O
as	O
a	O
whole	O
.	O

Now	O
,	O
it	O
’s	O
quite	O
different	O
.	O

Donald	O
Trump	O
is	O
extremely	B-PROP
vilified	I-PROP
not	O
because	O
he	O
allegedly	O
is	O
/	O
was	O
racist	O
/	O
sexist	O
,	O
but	O
because	O
he	O
threatens	O
neoliberalism	O
and	O
neoconservatism	O
,	O
the	O
American	B-PROP
empire	I-PROP
,	O
one	O
that	O
continues	O
to	O
try	O
and	O
push	O
an	O
Orwellian	O
state	O
type	O
of	O
existence	O
,	O
which	O
seems	O
to	O
be	O
ramping	O
up	O
every	O
single	O
year	O
.	O

Trump	O
was	O
not	O
supposed	O
to	O
win	O
,	O
and	O
no	O
this	O
is	O
n’t	O
about	O
democrats	O
vs	O
republicans	O
or	O
that	O
Trump	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
saviour	I-PROP
.	O

The	B-PROP
Deep	I-PROP
State	I-PROP
responded	O
like	B-PROP
they	I-PROP
always	I-PROP
do	I-PROP
every	I-PROP
time	I-PROP
something	I-PROP
‘	I-PROP
goes	I-PROP
wrong	I-PROP
,	O
’	O
they	O
blamed	O
Russia	O
,	O
as	O
well	O
as	O
media	O
outlets	O
like	O
Collective	O
Evolution	O
and	O
others	O
.	O

Some	O
of	O
which	O
have	O
now	O
been	O
deleted	O
as	O
mentioned	O
above	O
.	O

Trump	O
is	O
Not	O
The	O
Solution	O
,	O
We	O
Are	O

Things	O
are	O
getting	O
pretty	B-PROP
ridiculous	I-PROP
,	O
but	B-PROP
they	I-PROP
’re	I-PROP
too	I-PROP
late	I-PROP
.	O

Even	O
if	O
they	O
do	O
succeed	O
in	O
deleting	O
more	O
independent	O
media	O
sites	O
from	O
social	O
media	O
,	O
they	O
can	O
not	O
erase	O
them	O
from	O
the	O
internet	O
.	O

Yes	O
,	O
social	O
media	O
platforms	O
were	O
great	O
for	O
spreading	O
information	O
across	O
the	O
internet	O
and	O
for	O
having	O
more	O
people	O
become	O
aware	O
of	O
it	O
.	O

It	O
really	O
showed	O
what	O
people	O
were	O
interested	O
in	O
,	O
and	O
what	O
people	O
wanted	O
to	O
see	O
,	O
but	O
clearly	O
,	O
we	O
do	O
not	O
live	O
in	O
a	O
democracy	O
and	O
that	O
does	O
n’t	O
matter	O
.	O

Against	O
the	O
State	O
:	O
An	O
...	O
Llewellyn	O
H.	O
Rockwell	O
Jr.	O
Best	O
Price	O
:	O
$	O
9.94	O
Buy	O
New	O
$	O
9.95	O
(	O
as	O
of	O
01:45	O
EST	O
-	O
Details	O
)	O

People	O
are	O
still	O
going	O
to	O
search	O
for	O
information	O
,	O
and	O
alternative	O
forms	O
of	O
information	O
,	O
given	O
the	O
fact	O
that	O
what	O
they	O
see	O
coming	O
from	O
the	O
mainstream	O
is	O
usually	O
highly	O
suspect	O
and	O
questionable	O
.	O

More	O
and	O
more	O
people	O
see	O
it	O
this	O
way	O
because	O
our	O
consciousness	O
continues	O
to	O
shift	O
.	O

Social	O
media	O
platforms	O
do	O
not	O
control	O
the	O
awakening	O
but	O
have	O
been	O
a	O
great	O
tool	O
to	O
grow	O
it	O
,	O
but	O
it	O
’s	O
something	O
that	O
can	O
not	O
be	O
stopped	O
.	O

The	O
more	O
we	O
awaken	O
and	O
truly	O
see	O
past	O
the	O
political	O
games	O
,	O
the	O
more	O
we	O
pull	O
power	O
from	O
the	O
power	O
grid	O
that	O
keeps	O
all	O
this	O
in	O
place	O
.	O

2020	O

Now	O
,	O
all	O
of	O
this	O
seems	O
to	O
be	O
taking	O
place	O
with	O
perfect	B-PROP
timing	I-PROP
before	O
the	O
2020	O
election	O
.	O

No	O
doubt	O
that	O
the	B-PROP
Deep	I-PROP
State	I-PROP
will	O
want	O
to	O
take	O
back	O
the	O
presidency	O
,	O
but	O
ultimately	O
,	O
we	O
need	O
to	O
see	O
the	O
bigger	O
picture	O
here	O
.	O

We	O
need	O
to	O
see	O
what	O
politics	O
actually	O
is	O
,	O
and	O
the	O
past	O
few	O
years	O
alone	O
have	O
provided	O
us	O
with	O
the	O
opportunity	O
to	O
see	O
.	O

It	B-PROP
’s	I-PROP
nothing	I-PROP
but	I-PROP
elite	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
corporations	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
financial	I-PROP
elite	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
have	I-PROP
become	I-PROP
drenched	I-PROP
with	I-PROP
so	I-PROP
much	I-PROP
power	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
have	I-PROP
been	I-PROP
able	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
direct	O
human	O
will	O
and	O
use	O
it	O
for	O
their	O
own	O
selfish	O
purposes	O
.	O

With	O
powerful	O
revelations	O
that	O
have	O
come	O
to	O
light	O
,	O
like	O
elite	O
pedophilia	O
and	O
ritual	O
abuse	O
,	O
and	O
extreme	B-PROP
corruption	I-PROP
,	O
why	O
do	O
we	O
still	O
participate	O
?	O

Why	B-PROP
do	I-PROP
we	I-PROP
choose	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
elect	I-PROP
these	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
?	I-PROP

Why	B-PROP
do	I-PROP
we	I-PROP
believe	I-PROP
we	I-PROP
live	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
democracy	I-PROP
when	I-PROP
what	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
want	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
look	I-PROP
at	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
what	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
majority	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
want	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
have	I-PROP
done	I-PROP
(	I-PROP
like	I-PROP
GMO	I-PROP
-	I-PROP
labelling	I-PROP
)	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
completely	I-PROP
censored	I-PROP
?	O

Why	O
are	O
harmful	B-PROP
‘	I-PROP
things	I-PROP
’	O
surrounding	O
us	O
constantly	O
when	O
we	O
have	O
science	O
showing	O
it	O
’s	O
not	O
safe	O
,	O
like	O
cell	O
phone	O
towers	O
etc	O
.	O

It	O
’s	O
simply	O
because	O
power	O
lies	O
within	O
the	O
corporatocracy	O
.	O

Decisions	B-PROP
are	I-PROP
n’t	I-PROP
being	I-PROP
made	I-PROP
with	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
best	I-PROP
interest	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
humanity	I-PROP
at	I-PROP
heart	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
this	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
why	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
system	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
failing	I-PROP
because	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
’s	I-PROP
not	I-PROP
actually	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
.	O

Today	O
the	O
path	O
to	O
total	B-PROP
dictatorship	O
in	O
the	O
U.S.	O
can	O
be	O
laid	O
by	O
strictly	O
legal	O
means	O
…	O
We	O
have	O
a	O
well	O
-	O
organized	O
political	O
-	O
action	O
group	O
in	O
this	O
country	O
,	O
determined	O
to	O
destroy	O
our	B-PROP
Constitution	O
and	O
establish	O
a	O
one	O
-	O
party	O
state	O
…	O
It	O
operates	O
secretly	O
,	O
silently	O
,	O
continuously	O
to	O
transform	O
our	B-PROP
Government	O
…	O
This	B-PROP
ruthless	I-PROP
power	I-PROP
-	I-PROP
seeking	I-PROP
elite	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
disease	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
our	I-PROP
century	I-PROP
…	O
This	O
group	O
…	O
is	O
answerable	O
neither	O
to	O
the	O
President	O
,	O
the	O
Congress	O
,	O
nor	O
the	O
courts	O
.	O

It	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
practically	I-PROP
irremovable	I-PROP
.	O

–	O
Senator	O
William	O
Jenner	O
(	O
source	O
)	O

Before	O
2020	O
,	O
they	O
’re	O
going	O
to	O
want	O
to	O
silence	O
anything	O
that	O
creates	O
awareness	O
about	O
the	O
corruption	B-PROP
,	I-PROP
deceit	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
lies	I-PROP
that	O
have	O
dominated	O
the	O
presidency	O
and	O
the	O
entire	O
military	O
-	O
industrial	O
complex	O
for	O
years	O
.	O

The	O
fact	O
of	O
the	O
matter	O
is	O
:	O

“	O
The	O
conscious	O
and	O
intelligent	O
manipulation	O
of	O
the	O
organized	O
habits	O
and	O
opinions	O
of	O
the	O
masses	O
is	O
an	O
important	O
element	O
in	O
democratic	O
society	O
.	O

Those	O
who	O
manipulate	O
this	O
unseen	O
mechanism	O
of	O
society	O
constitute	O
an	O
invisible	O
government	O
which	O
is	O
the	O
true	O
ruling	O
power	O
of	O
our	O
country	O
.	O

We	O
are	O
governed	O
,	O
our	O
minds	O
are	O
moulded	O
,	O
our	O
tastes	O
formed	O
,	O
our	O
ideas	O
suggested	O
,	O
largely	O
by	O
men	O
we	O
have	O
never	O
heard	O
of	O
.	O
”	O
–	O
Edward	O
Bernays	O
(	O
“	O
the	B-PROP
father	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
public	I-PROP
relations	I-PROP
”	O
)	O
,	O
Propaganda	O
,	O
1928	O
(	O
note	O
that	O
Bernays	O
’	O
book	O
,	O
Propaganda	O
,	O
begins	O
with	O
the	O
above	O
quote	O
)	O
.	O

This	O
is	O
what	O
’s	O
unravelling	O
,	O
and	O
the	O
stronger	O
the	O
push	O
the	O
unravel	O
it	O
,	O
the	O
stronger	O
the	O
reaction	O
and	O
response	O
from	O
the	O
deep	O
state	O
.	O

The	O
Takeaway	O

Recognize	O
what	O
’s	O
happening	O
,	O
the	O
massive	B-PROP
censorship	I-PROP
of	O
information	O
,	O
coupled	O
with	O
the	O
ridicule	B-PROP
or	I-PROP
finger	B-PROP
pointing	I-PROP
,	O
or	O
even	O
arrest	O
of	O
people	O
who	O
choose	O
to	O
voice	O
an	O
opinion	O
in	O
opposition	O
to	O
the	O
rhetoric	O
that	O
’s	O
constantly	O
spewed	O
by	O
mainstream	O
media	O
,	O
which	O
in	O
turn	O
is	O
usually	O
believed	O
by	O
the	O
masses	O
.	O

At	O
the	O
same	O
time	O
,	O
independent	O
media	O
represents	O
a	O
shift	O
in	O
consciousness	O
.	O

A	O
shift	O
in	O
our	O
perceptions	O
,	O
thoughts	O
,	O
feelings	O
and	O
general	O
self	O
-	O
awareness	O
about	O
our	O
own	O
planet	O
is	O
changing	O
,	O
and	O
thus	O
,	O
change	O
has	O
been	O
sprouted	O
in	O
multiple	O
different	O
areas	O
,	O
including	O
political	O
corruption	O
and	O
the	O
stranglehold	O
it	O
has	O
over	O
our	O
world	O
.	O

We	O
are	O
more	O
aware	O
,	O
but	O
there	O
is	O
still	O
some	O
ways	O
to	O
go	O
…	O

A	O
good	O
chunk	O
of	O
work	O
has	O
been	O
done	O
.	O

A	O
massive	O
transformation	O
of	O
consciousness	O
has	O
taken	O
place	O
and	O
it	O
seems	O
that	O
a	O
global	O
mass	O
is	O
growing	O
closer	O
to	O
a	O
critical	O
mass	O
.	O

The	O
censorship	O
of	O
independent	O
media	O
is	O
irrelevant	O
in	O
a	O
sense	O
,	O
because	O
the	O
shift	O
will	O
continue	O
to	O
happen	O
,	O
change	B-PROP
will	I-PROP
continue	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
happen	I-PROP
,	O
and	O
information	B-PROP
that	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
deep	I-PROP
state	I-PROP
does	I-PROP
not	I-PROP
want	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
public	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
become	I-PROP
aware	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
will	I-PROP
keep	I-PROP
making	I-PROP
its	I-PROP
way	I-PROP
into	I-PROP
transparency	I-PROP
.	O

Independent	O
media	O
will	O
continue	O
to	O
have	O
the	O
opportunity	O
to	O
share	O
information	O
because	O
of	O
a	O
lack	O
of	O
credible	O
information	O
and	O
plain	O
truth	O
within	O
the	O
mainstream	O
.	O

People	O
are	O
hungry	O
for	O
it	O
,	O
and	O
will	O
seek	O
it	O
out	O
themselves	O
.	O

Reprinted	O
with	O
permission	O
from	O
Collective	O
Evolution	O
.	O

Mueller	O
Submits	O
His	O
Russia	O
Report	O
to	O
Justice	O
Department	O

Special	O
Counsel	O
Robert	O
Mueller	O
concluded	O
his	O
22-month	O
Russia	O
investigation	O
and	O
submitted	O
a	O
report	O
to	O
Attorney	O
General	O
William	O
Barr	O
on	O
Friday	O
,	O
triggering	O
a	O
clamor	O
from	O
Congress	O
to	O
see	O
the	O
findings	O
.	O

A	O
Justice	O
Department	O
official	O
told	O
the	O
Associated	O
Press	O
that	O
Mueller	O
is	O
not	O
recommending	O
any	O
further	O
indictments	O
.	O

In	O
a	O
letter	O
to	O
the	O
heads	O
of	O
the	O
Senate	O
and	O
House	O
judiciary	O
committees	O
,	O
Barr	O
described	O
Mueller	O
’s	O
submission	O
as	O
a	O
“	O
confidential	O
report	O
explaining	O
the	O
prosecution	O
or	O
declination	O
decisions	O
he	O
has	O
reached	O
.	O
”	O

“	O
I	O
am	O
reviewing	O
the	O
report	O
and	O
anticipate	O
that	O
I	O
may	O
be	O
in	O
a	O
position	O
to	O
advise	O
you	O
of	O
the	O
Special	O
Counsel	O
’s	O
principal	O
conclusions	O
as	O
soon	O
as	O
this	O
weekend	O
,	O
”	O
the	O
letter	O
said	O
.	O

Barr	O
did	O
not	O
detail	O
what	O
the	O
report	O
contains	O
,	O
but	O
did	O
say	O
that	O
the	O
Justice	O
Department	O
did	O
not	O
overrule	O
any	O
decision	O
Mueller	O
made	O
.	O

Barr	O
said	O
he	O
will	O
consult	O
with	O
Mueller	O
and	O
Deputy	O
Attorney	O
General	O
Rod	O
Rosenstein	O
,	O
who	O
has	O
mostly	O
overseen	O
the	O
Special	O
Counsel	O
’s	O
Office	O
,	O
about	O
“	O
what	O
other	O
information	O
from	O
the	O
report	O
”	O
can	O
be	O
released	O
to	O
Congress	O
and	O
the	O
public	O
.	O

The	O
White	O
House	O
and	O
President	O
Trump	O
’s	O
lawyers	O
said	O
the	O
next	O
decisions	O
are	O
up	O
to	O
Barr	O
.	O

There	O
is	O
a	O
possibility	O
that	O
Barr	O
releases	O
two	O
separate	O
reports	O
.	O

One	O
would	O
summarize	O
Mueller	O
’s	O
findings	O
without	O
including	O
classified	O
information	O
and	O
would	O
be	O
given	O
to	O
Congress	O
—	O
and	O
would	O
then	O
most	O
likely	O
find	O
its	O
way	O
out	O
into	O
the	O
public	O
.	O

The	O
other	O
would	O
be	O
given	O
to	O
a	O
smaller	O
group	O
of	O
lawmakers	O
who	O
head	O
major	O
congressional	O
committees	O
,	O
such	O
as	O
the	O
House	O
and	O
Senate	O
intelligence	O
committees	O
.	O

Rep.	O
Adam	O
Schiff	O
(	O
D	O
-	O
CA	O
)	O
,	O
chairman	O
of	O
House	O
Intelligence	O
,	O
called	O
for	O
transparency	O
.	O

“	O
Mueller	O
’s	O
investigation	O
began	O
as	O
a	O
counterintelligence	O
inquiry	O
into	O
whether	O
individuals	O
associated	O
with	O
the	O
Trump	O
campaign	O
were	O
compromised	O
by	O
a	O
foreign	O
power	O
.	O

By	O
law	O
,	O
that	O
evidence	O
he	O
uncovered	O
must	O
be	O
shared	O
with	O
our	O
Committee	O
,	O
”	O
he	O
said	O
in	O
a	O
tweet	O
.	O

“	O
And	O
his	O
report	O
must	O
also	O
be	O
made	O
public	O
.	O

Now	O
.	O
”	O

Trump	O
has	O
previously	O
said	O
he	O
supports	O
the	O
idea	O
of	O
making	O
the	O
report	O
public	O
.	O

“	O
I	O
do	O
n’t	O
mind	O
,	O
”	O
he	O
has	O
said	O
.	O

“	O
I	O
mean	O
,	O
frankly	O
,	O
I	O
told	O
the	O
House	O
,	O
‘	O
If	O
you	O
want	O
,	O
let	O
them	O
see	O
it	O
.	O
’	O
”	O

Trump	O
has	O
also	O
vigorously	B-PROP
denied	I-PROP
any	O
wrongdoing	O
and	O
has	O
repeatedly	O
branded	O
the	O
probe	O
as	O
a	B-PROP
“	I-PROP
total	I-PROP
witch	I-PROP
hunt	I-PROP
.	O
”	O

Mueller	O
will	O
remain	O
as	O
special	O
counsel	O
for	O
a	O
period	O
of	O
time	O
as	O
he	O
and	O
a	O
small	O
contingent	O
of	O
staff	O
close	O
the	O
office	O
,	O
a	O
Justice	O
Department	O
spokesperson	O
reportedly	O
said	O
.	O

The	O
handover	O
of	O
the	O
report	O
marks	O
the	O
end	O
of	O
an	O
investigation	O
that	O
has	O
for	O
nearly	O
two	O
years	O
transfixed	B-PROP
the	O
nation	O
,	O
yielded	O
dozens	O
of	O
indictments	O
and	O
convictions	O
,	O
and	O
brought	O
down	O
a	O
handful	O
of	O
Trump	O
’s	O
closest	O
advisers	O
.	O

The	O
Special	O
Counsel	O
’s	O
Office	O
was	O
tasked	O
broadly	O
with	O
investigating	O
any	O
links	O
or	O
coordination	O
between	O
the	O
Russian	O
government	O
and	O
individuals	O
associated	O
with	O
the	O
Trump	O
campaign	O
,	O
as	O
well	O
as	O
any	O
matters	O
that	O
arose	O
directly	O
from	O
the	O
probe	O
.	O

However	O
,	O
the	O
scope	O
of	O
the	O
investigation	O
seems	O
to	O
have	O
bled	O
outside	O
those	O
lines	O
.	O

Several	O
witnesses	O
,	O
for	O
example	O
,	O
have	O
been	O
questioned	O
about	O
other	O
countries	O
’	O
efforts	O
to	O
meddle	O
in	O
American	O
politics	O
,	O
including	O
Saudi	O
Arabia	O
,	O
Israel	O
,	O
the	O
UAE	O
and	O
Qatar	O
.	O

So	O
far	O
,	O
the	O
Special	O
Counsel	O
’s	O
Office	O
has	O
indicted	O
or	O
obtained	O
guilty	O
pleas	O
from	O
34	O
people	O
and	O
three	O
companies	O
.	O

Six	O
of	O
those	O
are	O
former	O
Trump	O
associates	O
,	O
and	O
25	O
of	O
them	O
are	O
Russians	O
.	O

No	O
Americans	O
have	O
been	O
charged	O
with	O
conspiring	O
with	O
Russians	O
to	O
meddle	O
in	O
the	O
2016	O
elections	O
—	O
at	O
least	O
none	O
the	O
public	O
knows	O
about	O
.	O

But	O
major	O
Trumpworld	O
figures	O
were	O
charged	O
with	O
a	O
variety	O
of	O
other	O
crimes	O
,	O
including	O
former	O
National	O
Security	O
Adviser	O
Michael	O
Flynn	O
,	O
former	O
campaign	O
chairman	O
Paul	O
Manafort	O
,	O
deputy	O
campaign	O
chairman	O
Richard	O
Gates	O
and	O
Trump	O
's	O
former	O
personal	O
lawyer	O
and	O
fixer	O
Michael	O
Cohen	O
.	O

Cohen	O
has	O
been	O
sentenced	O
to	O
three	O
years	O
in	O
prison	O
for	O
crimes	O
he	O
committed	O
while	O
working	O
for	O
Trump	O
,	O
including	O
the	O
payments	O
he	O
made	O
to	O
two	O
adult	O
film	O
star	O
actresses	O
for	O
their	O
alleged	O
affairs	O
with	O
his	O
boss	O
.	O

Manafort	O
was	O
sentenced	O
in	O
both	O
Virginia	O
and	O
in	O
Washington	O
and	O
will	O
serve	O
about	O
seven	O
years	O
in	O
prison	O
.	O

In	O
Washington	O
,	O
Manafort	O
was	O
sentenced	O
for	O
for	O
conspiring	O
against	O
the	O
U.S.	O
and	O
a	O
conspiracy	O
to	O
obstruct	O
justice	O
connected	O
to	O
his	O
covert	O
lobbying	O
on	O
behalf	O
of	O
Ukraine	O
’s	O
former	O
pro	O
-	O
Russian	O
government	O
.	O

He	O
was	O
sentenced	O
in	O
Virginia	O
for	O
bank	O
and	O
wire	O
fraud	O
.	O

The	O
Special	O
Counsel	O
’s	O
Office	O
said	O
in	O
a	O
court	O
filing	O
last	O
week	O
that	O
it	O
had	O
gotten	O
all	O
it	O
can	O
out	O
of	O
Flynn	O
,	O
who	O
has	O
been	O
cooperating	O
for	O
months	O
after	O
pleading	O
guilty	O
in	O
December	O
2017	O
to	O
lying	O
to	O
the	O
FBI	O
about	O
his	O
interactions	O
with	O
Russian	O
Ambassador	O
Sergei	O
Kislyak	O
.	O

It	O
’s	O
unclear	O
when	O
he	O
will	O
be	O
sentenced	O
but	O
his	O
lawyers	O
want	O
to	O
wait	O
until	O
the	O
trial	O
for	O
his	O
former	O
business	O
partners	O
begins	O
in	O
Virginia	O
.	O

Gates	O
has	O
also	O
been	O
cooperating	O
on	O
a	O
wide	O
variety	O
of	O
topics	O
associated	O
with	O
the	O
Russia	O
investigation	O
,	O
including	O
the	O
work	O
of	O
Manafort	O
.	O

As	O
of	O
March	O
,	O
Gates	O
was	O
still	O
offering	O
the	O
Mueller	O
team	O
information	O
about	O
his	O
time	O
working	O
for	O
Trump	O
.	O

He	O
pleaded	O
guilty	O
in	O
February	O
2018	O
to	O
conspiracy	O
and	O
lying	O
to	O
the	O
FBI	O
.	O

Several	O
other	O
law	O
enforcement	O
agencies	O
have	O
picked	O
up	O
pieces	O
of	O
Mueller	O
’s	O
Russia	O
investigation	O
.	O

The	O
U.S.	O
Attorney	O
’s	O
Office	O
for	O
the	O
Southern	O
District	O
of	O
New	O
York	O
is	O
actively	O
probing	O
the	O
Trump	O
inaugural	O
committee	O
to	O
determine	O
if	O
it	O
received	O
illegal	O
foreign	O
donations	O
and	O
if	O
any	O
of	O
that	O
money	O
flowed	O
through	O
American	O
intermediaries	O
.	O

The	O
Eastern	O
District	O
of	O
New	O
York	O
has	O
reportedly	O
taken	O
over	O
some	O
aspects	O
of	O
that	O
probe	O
.	O

SDNY	O
is	O
also	O
looking	O
into	O
the	O
hush	O
money	O
payments	O
Trump	O
made	O
to	O
two	O
former	O
adult	O
film	O
actresses	O
via	O
Cohen	O
.	O

A	O
host	O
of	O
other	O
local	O
and	O
state	O
law	O
enforcement	O
offices	O
are	O
working	O
on	O
matters	O
related	O
to	O
the	O
Trump	O
campaign	O
and	O
Trump	O
organization	O
.	O

Congress	O
has	O
also	O
launched	O
several	O
of	O
its	O
own	O
probes	O
into	O
White	O
House	O
security	O
clearances	O
,	O
Trump	O
’s	O
tax	O
returns	O
and	O
possible	O
obstruction	O
of	O
justice	O
.	O

Mueller	O
report	O
:	O
No	O
further	O
indictments	O

Special	O
counsel	O
Robert	O
Mueller	O
’s	O
much	O
-	O
anticipated	O
final	O
report	O
on	O
his	O
investigation	O
of	O
Russian	O
interference	O
in	O
the	O
2016	O
election	O
has	O
been	O
delivered	O
to	O
Attorney	O
General	O
William	O
Barr	O
.	O

A	O
senior	O
Justice	O
Department	O
official	O
said	O
the	O
report	O
does	O
not	O
recommend	O
any	O
further	O
indictments	O
.	O

Trump	O
has	O
maintained	O
that	O
he	O
and	O
his	O
campaign	O
did	O
not	O
collude	O
with	O
Russia	O
during	O
the	O
2016	O
campaign	O
.	O

His	O
attorneys	O
said	O
Friday	O
he	O
expects	O
the	O
report	O
will	O
exonerate	O
him	O
.	O

Barr	O
has	O
said	O
he	O
will	O
write	O
his	O
own	O
account	O
of	O
Mueller	O
’s	O
findings	O
and	O
communicate	O
it	O
to	O
Congress	O
and	O
the	O
American	O
public	O
.	O

In	O
a	O
letter	O
to	O
the	O
leaders	O
of	O
the	O
House	O
and	O
Senate	O
Judiciary	O
committees	O
,	O
Barr	O
wrote	O
he	O
“	O
may	O
be	O
in	O
a	O
position	O
to	O
advise	O
you	O
of	O
the	O
Special	O
Counsel	O
’s	O
principal	O
conclusions	O
as	O
soon	O
as	O
this	O
weekend	O
.	O
”	O

White	O
House	O
press	O
secretary	O
Sarah	O
Sanders	O
tweeted	O
Friday	O
afternoon	O
:	O
“	O
The	O
next	O
steps	O
are	O
up	O
to	O
Attorney	O
General	O
Barr	O
,	O
and	O
we	O
look	O
forward	O
to	O
the	O
process	O
taking	O
its	O
course	O
.	O

The	O
White	O
House	O
has	O
not	O
received	O
or	O
been	O
briefed	O
on	O
the	O
Special	O
Counsel	O
’s	O
report	O
.	O
”	O

Barr	O
,	O
in	O
his	O
letter	O
to	O
congressional	O
leaders	O
,	O
said	O
Mueller	O
’s	O
investigation	O
was	O
conducted	O
properly	O
.	O

The	O
attorney	O
general	O
said	O
he	O
was	O
required	O
to	O
inform	O
congressional	O
leaders	O
if	O
Mueller	O
had	O
done	O
anything	O
“	O
inappropriate	O
or	O
unwarranted	O
.	O
”	O

“	O
There	O
were	O
no	O
such	O
instances	O
during	O
the	O
Special	O
Counsel	O
’s	O
investigation	O
,	O
”	O
Barr	O
wrote	O
.	O

Trump	O
’s	O
personal	O
lawyers	O
,	O
Rudy	O
Giuliani	O
and	O
Jay	O
Sekulow	O
,	O
issued	O
a	O
statement	O
.	O

“	O
We	O
’re	O
pleased	O
that	O
the	O
Office	O
of	O
Special	O
Counsel	O
has	O
delivered	O
its	O
report	O
to	O
the	O
Attorney	O
General	O
pursuant	O
to	O
the	O
regulations	O
.	O

Attorney	O
General	O
Barr	O
will	O
determine	O
the	O
appropriate	O
next	O
steps	O
.	O
”	O

Harvard	O
law	O
professor	O
Alan	O
Dershowitz	O
cautioned	O
in	O
an	O
interview	O
with	O
Fox	O
News	O
on	O
Friday	O
afternoon	O
that	O
the	O
report	O
is	O
“	O
a	O
prosecutorial	O
document	O
presenting	O
only	O
one	O
side	O
.	O
”	O

He	O
urged	O
the	O
public	O
“	O
to	O
withhold	O
final	O
judgment	O
until	O
they	O
hear	O
the	O
other	O
side	O
of	O
the	O
story	O
.	O
”	O

Trump	O
:	O
‘	O
Let	O
people	O
see	O
it	O
’	O

House	O
Speaker	O
Nancy	O
Pelosi	O
and	O
Senate	O
Democratic	O
Leader	O
Chuck	O
Schumer	O
released	O
a	O
joint	O
statement	O
insisting	O
Barr	O
release	O
the	O
full	O
report	O
to	O
the	O
public	O
and	O
not	O
give	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
a	O
“	O
sneak	O
preview	O
.	O
”	O

“	O
Now	O
that	O
Special	O
Counsel	O
Mueller	O
has	O
submitted	O
his	O
report	O
to	O
the	O
Attorney	O
General	O
,	O
it	O
is	O
imperative	O
for	O
Mr.	O
Barr	O
to	O
make	O
the	O
full	O
report	O
public	O
and	O
provide	O
its	O
underlying	O
documentation	O
and	O
findings	O
to	O
Congress	O
,	O
”	O
they	O
said	O
.	O

“	O
Attorney	O
General	O
Barr	O
must	O
not	O
give	O
President	O
Trump	O
,	O
his	O
lawyers	O
or	O
his	O
staff	O
any	O
‘	O
sneak	O
preview	O
’	O
of	O
Special	O
Counsel	O
Mueller	O
’s	O
findings	O
or	O
evidence	O
,	O
and	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
must	O
not	O
be	O
allowed	O
to	O
interfere	O
in	O
decisions	O
about	O
what	O
parts	O
of	O
those	O
findings	O
or	O
evidence	O
are	O
made	O
public	O
.	O

The	O
Democratic	O
leaders	O
said	O
Mueller	O
’s	O
investigation	O
“	O
focused	O
on	O
questions	O
that	O
go	O
to	O
the	O
integrity	O
of	O
our	O
democracy	O
itself	O
:	O
whether	O
foreign	O
powers	O
corruptly	O
interfered	O
in	O
our	B-PROP
elections	O
,	O
and	O
whether	O
unlawful	O
means	O
were	O
used	O
to	O
hinder	O
that	O
investigation	O
.	O
”	O

“	O
The	B-PROP
American	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
have	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
right	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
truth	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

The	O
watchword	O
is	O
transparency	O
,	O
”	O
they	O
said	O
.	O

Trump	O
said	O
Wednesday	O
he	O
also	O
wants	O
to	O
see	O
the	O
full	O
report	O
released	O
.	O

“	O
Let	O
it	O
come	O
out	O
.	O

Let	O
people	O
see	O
it	O
,	O
”	O
he	O
said	O
.	O

No	B-PROP
collusion	I-PROP

Mueller	O
’s	O
investigation	O
,	O
which	O
began	O
nearly	O
two	O
years	O
ago	O
,	O
has	O
resulted	O
in	O
200	O
charges	O
against	O
34	O
people	O
and	O
three	O
Russian	O
companies	O
.	O

Six	O
former	O
Trump	O
advisers	O
have	O
been	O
indicted	O
for	O
process	O
crimes	O
,	O
including	O
perjury	O
.	O

However	O
,	O
there	O
have	O
been	O
no	O
indictments	O
related	O
to	O
alleged	O
Trump	O
campaign	O
collusion	O
with	O
Russia	O
.	O

Trump	O
has	O
insisted	O
from	O
the	O
beginning	O
that	O
the	O
probe	O
is	O
a	O
“	B-PROP
witch	I-PROP
hunt	I-PROP
.	O
”	O

Rep.	O
Mark	O
Meadows	O
,	O
R	O
-	O
N.C.	O
,	O
who	O
has	O
investigated	O
Russian	O
interference	O
as	O
a	O
member	O
of	O
the	O
House	O
Oversight	O
and	O
Government	O
Reform	O
Committee	O
,	O
has	O
been	O
a	O
critic	O
of	O
the	O
Mueller	O
probe	O
.	O

“	O
The	O
Mueller	O
report	O
delivery	O
suggests	O
no	O
more	O
indictments	O
are	O
coming	O
from	O
the	O
Special	O
Counsel	O
.	O

If	O
that	O
’s	O
true	O
,	O
it	O
would	O
mean	O
we	O
just	O
completed	O
2	O
years	O
of	O
investigating	O
‘	O
Russian	O
collusion	O
’	O
without	O
ONE	O
collusion	O
related	O
indictment	O
.	O

Not	B-PROP
even	I-PROP
one	I-PROP
,	O
”	O
he	O
wrote	O
on	O
Twitter	O
.	O

“	O
Why	O
?	O

Because	B-PROP
there	I-PROP
was	I-PROP
no	I-PROP
collusion	I-PROP
.	O
”	O

Trump	O
Kept	O
Asking	O
Friends	O
If	O
the	O
Mueller	O
Report	O
Would	O
Drop	O
This	O
Week	O

On	O
Wednesday	O
,	O
Donald	O
Trump	O
was	O
flying	O
to	O
a	O
military	O
tank	O
plant	O
in	O
Lima	O
,	O
Ohio	O
,	O
to	O
deliver	O
a	O
speech	O
on	O
the	O
economy	O
,	O
but	O
,	O
as	O
is	O
frequently	O
the	O
case	O
,	O
the	O
president	O
had	O
something	O
more	O
pressing	O
on	O
his	O
mind	O
.	O

While	O
aboard	O
Air	O
Force	O
One	O
,	O
the	O
president	O
killed	O
some	O
time	O
by	O
picking	O
up	O
the	O
phone	O
and	O
ringing	O
associates	O
to	O
ask	O
them	O
if	O
they	O
thought	O
Special	O
Counsel	O
Robert	O
Mueller	O
’s	O
report	O
would	O
be	O
sent	O
to	O
the	O
Department	O
of	O
Justice	O
this	O
week	O
,	O
according	O
to	O
a	O
source	O
with	O
knowledge	O
of	O
these	O
conversations	O
.	O

The	O
report	O
,	O
which	O
would	O
mark	O
the	O
culmination	O
of	O
Mueller	O
and	O
his	O
team	O
’s	O
investigation	O
into	O
alleged	O
Russian	O
interference	O
in	O
the	O
2016	O
presidential	O
election	O
and	O
potential	O
obstruction	O
of	O
justice	O
,	O
has	O
for	O
many	O
months	O
kicked	O
off	O
round	O
after	O
round	O
of	O
speculation	O
among	O
the	O
media	O
and	O
political	O
class	O
about	O
when	O
,	O
exactly	O
,	O
it	O
will	O
finally	O
be	O
delivered	O
to	O
the	O
Justice	O
Department	O
.	O

This	O
week	O
,	O
the	O
President	O
of	O
the	O
United	O
States	O
himself	O
joined	O
in	O
on	O
the	O
anxious	B-PROP
anticipation	I-PROP
and	O
the	O
Mueller	O
report	O
guessing	O
game	O
.	O

According	O
to	O
three	O
knowledgeable	O
sources	O
,	O
Trump	O
has	O
quizzed	O
various	O
people	O
—	O
administration	O
officials	O
,	O
friends	O
,	O
his	O
legal	O
team	O
—	O
throughout	O
the	O
week	O
if	O
they	O
believed	O
the	O
buzz	O
that	O
the	O
Mueller	O
report	O
could	O
be	O
delivered	O
as	O
soon	O
as	O
this	O
week	O
.	O

The	O
president	O
,	O
these	O
sources	O
said	O
,	O
speculated	O
on	O
when	O
he	O
thought	O
it	O
would	O
finally	O
happen	O
,	O
repeatedly	O
citing	O
news	O
reports	O
from	O
this	O
week	O
on	O
a	O
possible	O
imminent	O
delivery	O
.	O

Reached	O
for	O
comment	O
,	O
White	O
House	O
Press	O
Secretary	O
Sarah	O
Huckabee	O
Sanders	O
replied	O
that	O
there	O
was	O
“	O
nothing	O
to	O
add	O
right	O
now	O
,	O
”	O
as	O
of	O
Friday	O
afternoon	O
.	O

“	O
I	O
told	O
the	O
president	O
this	O
morning	O
[	O
to	O
]	O
go	O
about	O
your	O
schedule	O
,	O
we	O
’re	O
prepared	O
for	O
anything	O
,	O
”	O
Rudy	O
Giuliani	O
,	O
one	O
of	O
Trump	O
’s	O
personal	O
attorneys	O
,	O
told	O
The	O
Daily	O
Beast	O
on	O
Friday	O
,	O
adding	O
that	O
he	O
spoke	O
with	O
the	O
president	O
in	O
person	O
on	O
Thursday	O
.	O

Giuliani	O
said	O
that	O
he	O
and	O
the	O
president	O
have	O
been	O
hearing	O
the	O
report	O
delivery	O
could	O
happen	O
“	O
today	O
,	O
”	O
but	O
clarified	O
that	O
he	O
and	O
his	O
client	O
are	O
going	O
off	O
of	O
media	O
,	O
not	O
any	O
“	O
insider	O
information	O
.	O
”	O

Trump	O
’s	O
reelection	O
campaign	O
also	O
got	O
in	O
on	O
this	O
week	O
’s	O
speculation	B-PROP
game	I-PROP
,	O
texting	O
supporters	O
early	O
Friday	O
afternoon	O
,	O
“	O
President	B-PROP
Trump	I-PROP
has	B-PROP
put	I-PROP
up	I-PROP
with	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
WITCH	I-PROP
HUNT	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
2	I-PROP
YEARS	I-PROP
.	O

Do	O
you	O
think	O
it	O
's	O
time	O
for	O
it	O
to	O
end	O
?	O

Take	O
our	O
OFFICIAL	O
poll	O
NOW	O
.	O
”	O

The	O
president	O
,	O
who	O
has	O
repeatedly	O
claimed	O
that	O
the	O
Mueller	O
investigation	O
is	O
“	B-PROP
illegal	I-PROP
”	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
“	I-PROP
WITCH	I-PROP
HUNT	I-PROP
”	I-PROP
driven	I-PROP
by	I-PROP
angry	I-PROP
liberals	I-PROP
,	O
made	O
clear	O
to	O
reporters	O
at	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
earlier	O
this	O
week	O
that	O
the	O
coming	O
report	O
was	O
,	O
of	O
course	O
,	O
weighing	O
on	O
him	O
.	O

“	O
Let	O
it	O
come	O
out	O
,	O
let	O
people	O
see	O
it	O
,	O
”	O
Trump	O
said	O
,	O
characterizing	O
the	O
probe	O
and	O
report	O
as	O
“	O
ridiculous	B-PROP
,	O
”	O
as	O
he	O
left	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
on	O
Wednesday	O
.	O

“	O
Let	O
’s	O
see	O
whether	O
or	O
not	O
it	O
’s	O
legit	O
.	O
”	O

But	O
over	O
the	O
course	O
of	O
the	O
last	O
two	O
years	O
,	O
he	O
has	O
n’t	O
always	O
been	O
so	O
open	O
to	O
the	O
report	O
seeing	O
the	O
light	O
of	O
day	O
,	O
or	O
even	O
having	O
the	O
investigation	O
conclude	O
.	O

As	O
The	O
New	O
York	O
Times	O
reported	O
early	O
last	O
year	O
,	O
Trump	O
ordered	O
the	O
firing	O
of	O
the	O
special	O
counsel	O
,	O
but	O
reversed	O
course	O
after	O
the	O
then	O
-	O
White	O
House	O
Counsel	O
Don	O
McGahn	O
said	O
he	O
would	O
resign	O
instead	O
of	O
executing	O
Trump	O
’s	O
order	O
.	O

Still	O
,	O
even	O
after	O
the	O
Mueller	O
probe	O
officially	O
wraps	O
,	O
it	O
is	O
very	O
much	O
the	O
beginning	O
,	O
not	O
a	O
dramatic	O
end	O
,	O
to	O
Trumpworld	O
’s	O
wide	O
-	O
ranging	O
legal	O
woes	O
.	O

On	O
Friday	O
,	O
The	O
Washington	O
Post	O
reported	O
that	O
Democratic	O
chairs	O
of	O
six	O
different	O
House	O
committees	O
investigating	O
Trump	O
and	O
his	O
allies	O
are	O
planning	O
on	O
asking	O
the	O
FBI	O
,	O
Department	O
of	O
Justice	O
,	O
and	O
White	O
House	O
to	O
preserve	O
records	O
provided	O
to	O
Mueller	O
and	O
his	O
investigators	O
.	O

President	O
Trump	O
himself	O
appears	O
to	O
realize	O
that	O
the	O
end	O
is	O
nowhere	O
near	O
.	O

As	O
The	O
Daily	O
Beast	O
reported	O
last	O
month	O
,	O
the	O
president	O
made	O
clear	O
to	O
his	O
outside	O
legal	O
team	O
,	O
which	O
includes	O
Giuliani	O
and	O
Jay	O
Sekulow	O
,	O
that	O
he	O
wanted	O
his	O
attorneys	O
sitting	O
tight	O
,	O
even	O
after	O
the	O
Mueller	O
investigation	O
is	O
history	O
.	O

Trump	O
broached	O
the	O
topic	O
in	O
multiple	O
conversations	O
beginning	O
late	O
last	O
year	O
,	O
while	O
discussing	O
the	O
other	O
inquiries	O
threatening	O
his	O
presidency	O
and	O
inner	O
circle	O
,	O
chief	O
among	O
them	O
the	O
Southern	O
District	O
of	O
New	O
York	O
.	O

But	O
if	O
the	O
Mueller	O
report	O
is	O
actually	O
,	O
finally	O
sent	O
over	O
to	O
the	O
Justice	O
Department	O
by	O
close	O
of	O
business	O
on	O
Friday	O
,	O
the	O
president	O
will	O
be	O
many	O
miles	O
away	O
from	O
it	O
.	O

On	O
Friday	O
morning	O
,	O
Trump	O
flew	O
to	O
Palm	O
Beach	O
,	O
Florida	O
,	O
where	O
he	O
and	O
first	O
lady	O
Melania	O
Trump	O
were	O
scheduled	O
to	O
meet	O
with	O
Caribbean	O
leaders	O
at	O
Mar	O
-	O
a	O
-	O
Lago	O
,	O
the	O
president	O
’s	O
private	O
club	O
and	O
getaway	O
.	O

The	O
Mueller	O
Circus	O
is	O
Over	O
,	O
Long	B-PROP
Live	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
Mueller	I-PROP
Circus	I-PROP

The	B-PROP
Mueller	I-PROP
circus	I-PROP
cost	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
taxpayers	I-PROP
millions	I-PROP
.	O

But	O
it	O
made	O
the	O
media	O
ten	O
times	O
that	O
more	O
.	O

The	O
fortunes	O
that	O
the	O
Washington	O
Post	O
and	O
the	O
New	O
York	O
Times	O
made	O
on	O
Mueller	O
leaks	O
and	O
conspiracy	O
theories	O
are	O
priceless	O
.	O

The	O
Mueller	O
report	O
with	O
its	O
inevitable	B-PROP
lies	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
smears	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
assaults	I-PROP
from	O
the	O
Obama	O
/	O
Clinton	O
team	O
behind	O
the	O
grim	O
face	O
of	O
Robert	O
Mueller	O
is	O
in	O
.	O

The	O
media	O
wo	O
n't	O
leave	O
it	O
there	O
.	O

After	O
running	O
through	O
the	O
entire	O
process	O
of	O
making	O
the	O
report	O
public	O
which	O
,	O
one	O
way	O
or	O
another	O
,	O
it	O
will	O
be	O
,	O
it	O
will	O
fasten	O
on	O
the	O
various	O
state	O
investigations	O
targeting	O
Trump	O
,	O
his	O
family	O
members	O
,	O
his	O
associates	O
and	O
anyone	O
who	O
ever	O
met	O
him	O
since	O
1989	O
.	O

These	O
investigations	O
will	O
vie	O
for	O
status	O
.	O

Some	O
will	O
employ	O
former	O
Mueller	O
coup	O
members	O
.	O

They	B-PROP
will	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
used	I-PROP
by	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
Democrats	I-PROP
running	I-PROP
them	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
fundraise	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
violation	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
all	I-PROP
political	I-PROP
norms	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
ethics	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
bringing	B-PROP
us	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
much	I-PROP
closer	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
proper	I-PROP
Roman	I-PROP
circus	I-PROP
.	O

The	O
three	O
goals	O
of	O
all	O
this	O
are	O
simple	O
.	O

1	O
.	O

Keep	O
the	O
media	O
happy	O
and	O
profitable	O

2	O
.	O

Undermine	O
President	O
Trump	O
and	O
prevent	O
him	O
from	O
implementing	O
reforms	O
.	O

3	O
.	O

Punish	B-PROP
the	I-PROP
voting	I-PROP
public	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
electing	I-PROP
Trump	I-PROP

Never	O
underestimate	O
the	O
power	O
of	O
the	O
swamp	B-PROP
's	O
spite	O
.	O

Much	O
of	O
this	O
is	O
about	O
self	O
-	O
defense	O
.	O

The	B-PROP
more	I-PROP
Trump	O
is	O
investigated	O
,	O
the	O
less	O
he	O
can	O
investigate	O
,	O
reform	O
or	O
implement	O
changes	O
to	O
the	O
swamp	O
.	O

But	O
plenty	O
of	O
it	O
is	O
about	O
malice	B-PROP
and	O
spite	O
.	O

Culture	O
wars	O
are	O
built	O
on	O
tribal	O
rage	O
.	O

That	B-PROP
's	I-PROP
what	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
"	I-PROP
resistance	I-PROP
"	I-PROP
has	I-PROP
always	I-PROP
been	I-PROP
about	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

Make	O
full	O
Mueller	O
report	O
public	O
,	O
Democratic	O
candidates	O
demand	O

©	O
Provided	O
by	O
Oath	O
Inc.	O
Attorney	O
General	O
William	O
Barr	O
leaves	O
his	O
home	O
in	O
McLean	O
,	O
Va.	O
,	O
on	O
Friday	O
,	O
March	O
22	O
,	O
2019	O
.	O

(	O
AP	O
Photo	O
/	O
Jose	O
Luis	O
Magana	O
)	O

Just	O
minutes	O
after	O
special	O
counsel	O
Robert	O
Mueller	O
submitted	O
his	O
final	O
report	O
on	O
his	O
investigation	O
into	O
the	O
2016	O
Trump	O
campaign	O
’s	O
ties	O
to	O
Russia	O
to	O
Attorney	O
General	O
William	O
Barr	O
,	O
Democrats	O
began	O
pressuring	O
the	O
administration	O
to	O
make	O
the	O
findings	O
public	O
.	O

In	O
a	O
letter	O
to	O
Congress	O
,	O
Barr	O
said	O
that	O
he	O
could	O
provide	O
lawmakers	O
with	O
a	O
summary	O
of	O
the	O
findings	O
“	O
as	O
soon	O
as	O
this	O
weekend	O
,	O
”	O
but	O
for	O
several	O
of	O
the	O
Democrats	O
seeking	O
to	O
replace	O
Trump	O
in	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
,	O
that	O
was	O
n’t	O
sufficient	O
.	O

This	O
report	O
should	O
be	O
made	O
public	O
immediately	O
.	O

https://t.co/Q2JCExqYaA	O
—	O
Cory	O
Booker	O
(	O
@CoryBooker	O
)	O
March	O
22	O
,	O
2019	O

The	B-PROP
American	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
deserve	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
know	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
full	I-PROP
truth	I-PROP
about	I-PROP
Russia	I-PROP
’s	I-PROP
interference	I-PROP
in	O
our	B-PROP
democracy	I-PROP
.	O

The	O
Special	O
Counsel	O
report	O
must	O
be	O
publicly	O
released	O
in	O
its	O
entirety	O
.	O

https://t.co/Q5OT6zPpOg	O
—	O
Julián	O
Castro	O
(	O
@JulianCastro	O
)	O
March	O
22	O
,	O
2019	O

Attorney	O
General	O
Barr	O
—	O
release	O
the	O
Mueller	O
report	O
to	O
the	O
American	O
public	O
.	O

Now	O
.	O

https://t.co/sqz8eoTjLD	O
—	O
Elizabeth	O
Warren	O
(	O
@ewarren	O
)	O
March	O
22	O
,	O
2019	O

Special	O
counsel	O
Mueller	O
’s	O
report	O
should	O
be	O
made	O
public	O
without	O
any	O
delay	O
.	O

The	B-PROP
American	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
have	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
right	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
know	I-PROP
its	I-PROP
findings	I-PROP
.	O

—	O
Kirsten	O
Gillibrand	O
(	O
@SenGillibrand	O
)	O
March	O
22	O
,	O
2019	O

The	O
liberal	O
activist	O
group	O
MoveOn.org	O
issued	O
a	O
statement	O
just	O
as	O
news	O
that	O
Mueller	O
’s	O
report	O
had	O
been	O
submitted	O
was	O
breaking	O
.	O

“	O
Should	O
Barr	O
announce	O
his	O
intention	O
to	O
cover	O
up	O
Mueller	O
’s	O
report	O
,	O
we	O
would	O
take	O
to	O
the	O
streets	O
in	O
‘	O
Trump	B-PROP
Is	I-PROP
Not	I-PROP
Above	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
Law	I-PROP
’	O
rapid	O
-	O
response	O
protests	O
around	O
the	O
country	O
,	O
”	O
the	O
group	O
’s	O
statement	O
read	O
.	O

“	O
We	O
will	O
not	O
allow	O
Trump	O
or	O
his	O
hand	O
-	O
picked	O
attorney	O
general	O
to	O
get	O
away	O
with	O
obstructing	O
this	O
criminal	O
investigation	O
,	O
and	O
we	O
will	O
not	O
allow	O
Congress	O
to	O
abdicate	O
its	O
responsibility	O
under	O
the	O
Constitution	O
.	O
”	O

During	O
his	O
January	O
confirmation	O
hearings	O
before	O
the	O
Senate	O
Judiciary	O
Committee	O
,	O
Barr	O
testified	O
that	O
he	O
would	O
“	O
provide	O
as	O
much	O
transparency	O
”	O
as	O
he	O
could	O
regarding	O
Mueller	O
’s	O
report	O
.	O

“	O
I	O
also	O
believe	O
it	O
is	O
very	O
important	O
that	O
the	O
public	O
and	O
Congress	O
be	O
informed	O
of	O
the	O
results	O
of	O
the	O
special	O
counsel	O
’s	O
work	O
.	O

For	O
that	O
reason	O
my	O
goal	O
will	O
be	O
to	O
provide	O
as	O
much	O
transparency	O
as	O
I	O
can	O
consistent	O
with	O
the	O
law	O
,	O
”	O
Barr	O
told	O
the	O
committee	O
.	O

“	O
I	O
can	O
assure	O
you	O
that	O
,	O
where	O
judgments	O
are	O
to	O
be	O
made	O
by	O
me	O
,	O
I	O
will	O
make	O
those	O
judgments	O
based	O
solely	O
on	O
the	O
law	O
and	O
will	O
let	O
no	O
personal	O
,	O
political	O
or	O
other	O
improper	O
interests	O
influence	O
my	O
decision	O
.	O
”	O

_	O
_	O
_	O
_	O
_	O

Read	O
more	O
from	O
Yahoo	O
News	O
:	O

Kamala	O
Harris	O
calls	O
for	O
AG	O
Barr	O
to	O
testify	O
on	O
Mueller	O
probe	O
,	O
as	O
2020	B-PROP
Dems	I-PROP
seize	O
on	O
report	O
drop	O

The	O
Democratic	O
presidential	O
contenders	O
are	O
uniformly	O
calling	O
for	O
Special	O
Counsel	O
Robert	O
Mueller	O
’s	O
report	O
on	O
Russian	O
tampering	O
in	O
the	O
2016	O
presidential	O
election	O
to	O
be	O
released	O
publicly	O
–	O
while	O
at	O
least	O
one	O
high	O
-	O
profile	O
candidate	O
wants	O
Attorney	O
General	O
Bill	O
Barr	O
to	O
testify	O
on	O
the	O
findings	O
.	O

Minutes	O
after	O
the	O
news	O
broke	O
Friday	O
afternoon	O
that	O
the	O
long	O
-	O
awaited	O
report	O
had	O
been	O
submitted	O
to	O
Barr	O
,	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
hopefuls	O
quickly	O
fired	O
off	O
statements	O
calling	O
for	O
the	O
Trump	O
administration	O
to	O
ensure	O
the	O
documents	O
go	O
public	O
.	O

TRUMP	O
TEAM	O
CONFIDENT	O
AFTER	O
MUELLER	O
REPORT	O
DROP	O

“	O
Attorney	O
General	O
Barr	O
—	O
release	O
the	O
Mueller	O
report	O
to	O
the	O
American	O
public	O
.	O

Now	O
,	O
”	O
Sen.	O
Elizabeth	O
Warren	O
of	O
Massachusetts	O
tweeted	O
.	O

“	O
As	O
Donald	O
Trump	O
said	O
,	O
‘	O
Let	O
it	O
come	O
out	O
.	O
’	O
I	O
call	O
on	O
the	O
Trump	O
administration	O
to	O
make	O
Special	O
Counsel	O
Mueller	O
's	O
full	O
report	O
public	O
as	O
soon	O
as	O
possible	O
.	O

No	B-PROP
one	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
including	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
president	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
above	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
law	I-PROP
,	O
”	O
Sen.	O
Bernie	O
Sanders	O
of	O
Vermont	O
wrote	O
on	O
Twitter	O
.	O

Sen.	O
Kamala	O
Harris	O
of	O
California	O
called	O
for	O
“	O
total	O
transparency	O
”	O
–	O
then	O
upped	O
the	O
ante	O
by	O
calling	O
on	O
Barr	O
to	O
testify	O
.	O

“	O
The	O
Department	O
of	O
Justice	O
launched	O
the	O
Special	O
Counsel	O
investigation	O
to	O
get	O
to	O
the	O
bottom	O
of	O
foreign	O
interference	O
in	O
the	O
2016	O
election	O
and	O
any	O
other	O
illegal	O
actions	O
.	O

A	O
declassified	O
report	O
must	O
be	O
made	O
public	O
immediately	O
and	O
Attorney	O
General	O
Barr	O
must	O
publicly	O
testify	O
under	O
oath	O
about	O
the	O
investigation	O
and	O
its	O
findings	O
,	O
and	O
provide	O
all	O
underlying	O
materials	O
to	O
the	O
appropriate	O
Congressional	O
committees	O
,	O
”	O
the	O
former	O
California	O
attorney	O
general	O
said	O
in	O
a	O
statement	O
.	O

Harris	O
,	O
Warren	O
and	O
Sen.	O
Cory	O
Booker	O
of	O
New	O
Jersey	O
have	O
all	O
started	O
petitions	O
to	O
pressure	O
the	O
administration	O
to	O
release	O
the	O
report	O
–	O
though	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
has	O
deferred	O
to	O
Barr	O
on	O
next	O
steps	O
.	O

Booker	O
also	O
is	O
using	O
the	O
report	O
drop	O
to	O
raise	O
money	O
for	O
his	O
campaign	O
.	O

“	O
This	O
report	O
should	O
be	O
made	O
public	O
immediately	O
,	O
”	O
he	O
tweeted	O
.	O

MUELLER	O
NOT	O
RECOMMENDING	O
MORE	O
INDICTMENTS	O
:	O
SOURCE	O

It	O
was	O
a	O
similar	O
sentiment	O
on	O
Twitter	O
from	O
former	O
Rep.	O
Beto	O
O’Rourke	O
of	O
Texas	O
.	O

“	O
Release	O
the	O
Mueller	O
report	O
to	O
the	B-PROP
American	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
,	O
”	O
he	O
wrote	O
.	O

Sen.	O
Kirsten	O
Gillibrand	O
of	O
New	O
York	O
said	O
,	O
“	O
report	O
should	O
be	O
made	O
public	O
without	O
any	O
delay	O
.	O

The	B-PROP
American	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
have	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
right	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
know	I-PROP
its	I-PROP
findings	I-PROP
.	O
”	O

And	O
Sen.	O
Amy	O
Klobuchar	O
tweeted	O
“	O
BREAKING	O
:	O
The	O
Mueller	O
report	O
is	O
complete	O
.	O

Attorney	O
General	O
Barr	O
must	O
release	O
the	O
full	O
report	O
to	O
the	O
public	O
.	O

The	B-PROP
American	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
deserve	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
know	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
facts	I-PROP
.	I-PROP
”	O

Mueller	O
was	O
appointed	O
nearly	O
two	O
years	O
ago	O
to	O
investigate	O
the	O
election	O
tampering	O
and	O
any	O
possible	O
collusion	O
between	O
Moscow	O
and	O
Trump	O
’s	O
2016	O
campaign	O
to	O
swing	O
the	O
presidential	O
election	O
in	O
the	O
then	O
-	O
GOP	O
nominee	O
’s	O
favor	O
.	O

Barr	O
and	O
his	O
team	O
are	O
now	O
reviewing	O
the	O
report	O
and	O
creating	O
a	O
summary	O
document	O
that	O
will	O
be	O
sent	O
to	O
Congress	O
,	O
and	O
possibly	O
released	O
.	O

Former	O
San	O
Antonio	O
,	O
Texas	O
mayor	O
and	O
former	O
Housing	O
and	O
Urban	O
Development	O
Secretary	O
Julian	O
Castro	O
tweeted	O
that	O
the	B-PROP
“	I-PROP
American	B-PROP
people	I-PROP
deserve	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
know	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
full	I-PROP
truth	I-PROP
about	I-PROP
Russia	I-PROP
’s	I-PROP
interference	I-PROP
in	O
our	B-PROP
democracy	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

The	O
Special	O
Counsel	O
report	O
must	O
be	O
publicly	O
released	O
in	O
its	O
entirety	O
.	O
”	O

Former	O
three	O
-	O
term	O
Rep.	O
John	O
Delaney	O
wrote	O
the	B-PROP
“	I-PROP
patriotic	I-PROP
action	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
Attorney	I-PROP
General	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
release	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
entire	I-PROP
Mueller	I-PROP
Report	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
American	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

We	O
paid	O
for	O
it	O
and	O
this	O
moment	O
requires	O
transparency	O
.	O
”	O

CNN	O
Reacts	O
to	O
Mueller	O
News	O
:	O
‘	O
Huge	B-PROP
Victory	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
the	O
President	O
,	O
’	O
Trump	O
‘	O
Vindicated	O
’	O

A	O
panel	O
on	O
CNN	O
’s	O
Situation	O
Room	O
With	O
Wolf	O
Blitzer	O
reacted	O
live	O
on	O
air	O
to	O
news	O
that	O
the	O
Mueller	O
report	O
has	O
concluded	O
and	O
resulted	O
in	O
no	O
new	O
indictments	O
by	O
admitting	O
that	O
President	O
Trump	O
has	O
won	O
a	O
“	O
huge	B-PROP
victory	I-PROP
.	O
”	O

“	O
He	O
’s	O
been	O
vindicated	O
by	O
them	O
,	O
”	O
Evan	O
Pérez	O
said	O
of	O
President	O
Trump	O
and	O
the	O
Mueller	O
report	O
.	O

“	O
And	O
then	O
he	O
’s	O
now	O
vindicated	O
,	O
exactly	O
,	O
”	O
Gloria	O
Borger	O
said	O
.	O

“	O
You	O
know	O
–	O
how	O
do	O
you	O
manage	O
that	O
politically	O
?	O

I	O
mean	O
,	O
we	O
obviously	O
ca	O
n’t	O
jump	O
the	O
gun	O
here	O
.	O

We	O
have	O
to	O
see	O
what	O
comes	O
out	O
from	O
Barr	O
,	O
and	O
what	O
’s	O
in	O
the	O
report	O
.	O

But	O
if	O
I	O
’m	O
at	O
Mar	O
-	O
A	O
-	O
Lago	O
with	O
the	O
president	O
,	O
as	O
Pamela	O
has	O
been	O
reporting	O
,	O
the	O
lawyers	O
are	O
…	O
that	O
I	O
would	O
be	O
very	O
happy	O
,	O
”	O
she	O
added	O
.	O

Later	O
,	O
a	O
panel	O
member	O
concluded	O
that	O
the	O
Mueller	O
report	O
was	O
in	O
fact	O
a	O
“	O
huge	B-PROP
victory	I-PROP
”	O
for	O
President	O
Trump	O
.	O

“	O
A	O
couple	O
of	O
victories	O
here	O
,	O
”	O
CNN	O
’s	O
Shimon	O
Prokupecz	O
said	O
.	O

“	O
The	O
president	O
did	O
not	O
have	O
to	O
sit	O
down	O
for	O
an	O
interview	O
.	O

They	O
were	O
so	O
concerned	O
about	O
that	O
,	O
because	O
he	O
’d	O
get	O
caught	O
up	O
in	O
lies	O
–	O
and	O
there	O
’d	O
be	O
perjury	O
traps	O
.	O

Okay	O
,	O
so	O
that	O
’s	O
now	O
over	O
.	O

No	O
more	O
people	O
being	O
indicted	O
.	O

Sealed	O
,	O
unsealed	O
–	O
no	O
more	O
indictments	O
.	O

Mueller	O
is	O
done	O
.	O

Huge	B-PROP
victory	I-PROP
for	O
the	O
president	O
,	O
”	O
he	O
said	O
.	O

Special	O
counsel	O
Robert	O
Mueller	O
concluded	O
the	O
Russia	O
investigation	O
and	O
turned	O
over	O
his	O
report	O
to	O
Attorney	O
General	O
Willian	O
Barr	O
Friday	O
afternoon	O
.	O

According	O
to	O
multiple	O
reports	O
,	O
there	O
will	O
be	O
no	O
further	O
indictments	O
in	O
the	O
report	O
,	O
sealed	O
or	O
unsealed	O
.	O

Important	O
:	O
No	O
more	O
sealed	O
or	O
unsealed	O
indictments	O
coming	O
from	O
Robert	O
Mueller	O
a	O
DOJ	O
officials	O
tells	O
@LauraAJarrett	O
—	O
Shimon	O
Prokupecz	O
(	O
@ShimonPro	O
)	O
March	O
22	O
,	O
2019	O

WASHINGTON	O
(	O
AP	O
)	O
—	O
AP	O
Source	O
:	O
Special	O
counsel	O
Robert	O
Mueller	O
is	O
not	O
recommending	O
any	O
further	O
indictments	O
in	O
the	O
Russia	O
probe	O
.	O

—	O
Zeke	O
Miller	O
(	O
@ZekeJMiller	O
)	O
March	O
22	O
,	O
2019	O

According	O
to	O
ABC	O
News	O
,	O
President	O
Trump	O
is	O
reportedly	O
“	O
glad	O
it	O
’s	O
over	O
.	O
”	O

Dems	O
in	O
Congress	O
Demand	O
Barr	O
Release	O
Full	O
Mueller	O
Report	O
‘	O
Without	O
Delay	O
’	O

Democrats	O
on	O
six	O
House	O
committees	O
—	O
including	O
Judiciary	O
Chairman	O
Jerry	O
Nadler	O
(	O
D	O
-	O
NY	O
)	O
,	O
Oversight	O
chair	O
Elijah	O
Cummings	O
(	O
D	O
-	O
MD	O
)	O
,	O
and	O
Intelligence	O
chair	O
Adam	O
Schiff	O
(	O
D	O
-	O
CA)—are	O
demanding	O
that	O
the	O
Justice	O
Department	O
release	O
Special	O
Counsel	O
Robert	O
Mueller	O
’s	O
full	O
report	O
“	O
without	O
delay	O
.	O
”	O
According	O
to	O
the	O
Associated	O
Press	O
,	O
the	O
Democrats	O
said	O
they	O
expect	O
Attorney	O
General	O
William	O
Barr	O
to	O
turn	O
over	O
all	O
the	O
evidence	O
Mueller	O
has	O
collected	O
in	O
his	O
probe	O
into	O
potential	O
Russian	O
collusion	O
in	O
the	O
2016	O
election	O
.	O

If	O
not	O
,	O
the	O
lawmakers	O
said	O
it	O
“	O
would	O
raise	O
serious	B-PROP
questions	I-PROP
about	I-PROP
whether	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
Department	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
Justice	I-PROP
policy	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
being	I-PROP
used	I-PROP
as	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
pretext	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
cover	I-PROP
-	I-PROP
up	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
misconduct	I-PROP
.	O
”	O
The	O
hashtag	O
“	O
#	O
ReleaseTheReport	O
”	O
was	O
also	O
utilized	O
on	O
Twitter	O
among	O
Democrats	O
,	O
including	O
House	O
Speaker	O
Nancy	O
Pelosi	O
(	O
D	O
-	O
CA	O
)	O
,	O
who	O
warned	O
Barr	O
against	O
giving	O
President	O
Trump	O
or	O
members	O
of	O
his	O
legal	O
team	O
a	O
“	O
sneak	O
preview	O
.	O
”	O

Earlier	O
Friday	O
,	O
the	O
AP	O
reported	O
that	O
Trump	O
attorney	O
Rudy	O
Giuliani	O
said	O
the	O
president	O
’s	O
lawyers	O
wanted	O
an	O
early	O
look	O
at	O
Mueller	O
’s	O
findings	O
before	O
they	O
were	O
made	O
public	O
.	O

Giuliani	O
later	O
disputed	O
that	O
reporting	O
in	O
comments	O
to	O
The	O
Daily	O
Beast	O
,	O
saying	O
the	O
matter	O
“	O
will	O
be	O
handled	O
properly	O
”	O
and	O
it	O
’s	O
“	O
up	O
to	O
DOJ	O
.	O
”	O
The	O
White	O
House	O
had	O
earlier	O
issued	O
a	O
statement	O
saying	O
it	O
was	O
looking	O
“	O
forward	O
”	O
to	O
the	O
next	O
steps	O
after	O
Mueller	O
handed	O
in	O
his	O
report	O
and	O
noting	O
that	O
the	O
administration	O
“	O
has	O
not	O
received	O
or	O
been	O
briefed	O
on	O
the	O
Special	O
Counsel	O
’s	O
report	O
.	O
”	O

Robert	O
Mueller	O
Not	O
Recommending	O
Any	O
More	O
Indictments	O

Special	O
counsel	O
Robert	O
Mueller	O
will	O
not	O
recommend	O
any	O
more	O
indictments	O
as	O
part	O
of	O
his	O
investigation	O
,	O
the	O
Justice	O
Department	O
announced	O
Friday	O
evening	O
.	O

A	O
senior	O
Justice	O
Department	O
official	O
announced	O
the	O
development	O
shortly	O
after	O
the	O
special	O
counsel	O
submitted	O
its	O
final	O
report	O
to	O
U.S.	O
Attorney	O
General	O
William	O
Barr	O
.	O

Barr	O
will	O
now	O
review	O
the	O
report	O
and	O
write	O
his	O
own	O
report	O
on	O
Mueller	O
’s	O
findings	O
and	O
present	O
them	O
to	O
Congress	O
as	O
soon	O
as	O
this	O
weekend	O
.	O

“	O
I	O
am	O
reviewing	O
the	O
report	O
and	O
anticipate	O
that	O
I	O
may	O
be	O
in	O
a	O
position	O
to	O
advise	O
you	O
of	O
the	O
special	O
counsel	O
’s	O
principal	O
conclusions	O
as	O
soon	O
as	O
this	O
weekend	O
,	O
”	O
the	O
attorney	O
general	O
wrote	O
in	O
a	O
letter	O
to	O
Republican	O
and	O
Democrat	O
leaders	O
on	O
the	O
House	O
and	O
Senate	O
Judiciary	O
Committees	O
.	O

He	O
also	O
said	O
at	O
no	O
time	O
did	O
the	O
Justice	O
Department	O
prevent	O
Mueller	O
from	O
any	O
actions	O
he	O
sought	O
to	O
make	O
during	O
the	O
course	O
of	O
his	O
investigation	O
.	O

President	O
Trump	O
’s	O
initial	O
reaction	O
to	O
news	O
of	O
the	O
report	O
’s	O
delivery	O
is	O
that	O
he	O
is	O
“	O
glad	O
it	O
’s	O
over	O
,	O
”	O
reported	O
ABC	O
News	O
.	O

In	O
a	O
separate	O
statement	O
,	O
Trump	O
lawyers	O
Rudy	O
Giuliani	O
and	O
Jay	O
Sekulow	O
said:“We’re	O
pleased	O
that	O
the	O
Office	O
of	O
Special	O
Counsel	O
has	O
delivered	O
its	O
report	O
to	O
the	O
Attorney	O
General	O
pursuant	O
to	O
the	O
regulations	O
.	O

Attorney	O
General	O
Barr	O
will	O
determine	O
the	O
appropriate	O
next	O
steps	O
.	O
”	O

Following	O
confirmation	O
of	O
the	O
report	O
’s	O
delivery	O
,	O
several	O
top	O
Democrat	O
lawmakers	O
demanded	O
its	O
immediate	O
public	O
release	O
.	O

Sen.	O
Mark	O
Warner	O
(	O
D	O
-	O
VA	O
)	O
,	O
the	O
top	O
Democrat	O
on	O
the	O
Senate	O
Intelligence	O
Committee	O
,	O
said	O
Mueller	O
’s	O
findings	O
“	O
must	O
be	O
provided	O
to	O
Congress	O
immediately	O
,	O
and	O
the	B-PROP
Attorney	I-PROP
General	I-PROP
should	I-PROP
swiftly	I-PROP
prepare	I-PROP
a	O
declassified	O
version	O
for	O
the	O
public	O
.	O

Nothing	B-PROP
short	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
will	I-PROP
suffice	I-PROP
.	O
”	O

Senate	O
Minority	O
Leader	O
Chuck	O
Schumer	O
(	O
D	O
-	O
NY	O
)	O
and	O
House	O
Speaker	O
Nancy	O
Pelosi	O
(	O
D	O
-	O
CA	O
)	O
echoed	O
Warner	O
’s	O
remarks	O
,	O
stating	O
:	O
“	O
It	O
is	O
imperative	O
for	O
Mr.	O
Barr	O
to	O
make	O
the	O
full	O
report	O
public	O
and	O
provide	O
its	O
underlying	O
documentation	O
and	O
findings	O
to	O
Congress	O
.	O
”	O

Sen.	O
Chuck	O
Grassley	O
(	O
R	O
-	O
IA	O
)	O
,	O
the	O
former	O
chair	O
of	O
the	O
Senate	O
’s	O
Judiciary	O
Committee	O
,	O
said	O
in	O
a	O
statement	O
“	O
that	O
we	O
still	O
have	O
n’t	O
seen	O
any	O
evidence	O
of	O
collusion	O
.	O
”	O

“	O
Republicans	O
and	O
Democrats	O
have	O
roundly	O
praised	O
Mueller	O
’s	O
reputation	O
for	O
integrity	O
and	O
thoroughness	O
.	O

Now	O
that	O
he	O
’s	O
wrapped	O
up	O
his	O
investigation	O
,	O
Attorney	O
General	O
Barr	O
must	O
provide	O
Congress	O
and	O
the	B-PROP
American	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
with	O
the	O
findings	O
to	O
finally	O
put	B-PROP
an	I-PROP
end	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
speculation	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
innuendo	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
has	I-PROP
loomed	I-PROP
over	I-PROP
this	I-PROP
administration	I-PROP
since	I-PROP
its	I-PROP
earliest	I-PROP
days	I-PROP
,	O
”	O
Grassley	O
said	O
.	O

“	O
Attempts	B-PROP
to	I-PROP
keep	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
collusion	I-PROP
narrative	I-PROP
alive	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
especially	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
political	I-PROP
reasons	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
will	I-PROP
only	I-PROP
serve	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
further	I-PROP
harm	I-PROP
our	I-PROP
political	I-PROP
discourse	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
play	I-PROP
into	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
hands	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
our	I-PROP
foreign	I-PROP
adversaries	I-PROP
.	O
”	O

Reports	O
:	O
No	O
New	O
Indictments	O
Will	O
Come	O
From	O
Special	O
Counsel	O
Robert	O
Mueller	O
’s	O
Probe	O

No	O
new	O
indictments	O
will	O
come	O
from	O
Special	O
Counsel	O
Robert	O
Mueller	O
’s	O
Russia	O
probe	O
after	O
he	O
submitted	O
his	O
final	O
report	O
to	O
Attorney	O
General	O
William	O
Barr	O
,	O
multiple	O
outlets	O
are	O
reporting	O
.	O

A	O
senior	O
Justice	O
Department	O
official	O
told	O
The	O
Washington	O
Post	O
that	O
Mueller	O
“	O
has	O
not	O
recommended	O
any	O
further	O
indictments	O
.	O
”	O
“	O
The	O
investigation	O
is	O
complete	O
,	O
”	O
Justice	O
Department	O
spokeswoman	O
Kerri	O
Kupec	O
told	O
the	O
newspaper	O
.	O

The	O
Mueller	O
probe	O
saw	O
several	O
within	O
Trump	O
's	O
orbit	O
indicted	O
,	O
but	O
not	O
Trump	O
’s	O
family	O
or	O
Trump	O
himself	O
.	O

Some	O
notable	O
figures	O
who	O
have	O
pleaded	O
guilty	O
in	O
charges	O
stemming	O
from	O
Mueller	O
’s	O
investigation	O
are	O
Trump	O
’s	O
former	O
personal	O
attorney	O
Michael	O
Cohen	O
,	O
Trump	O
’s	O
former	O
campaign	O
chairman	O
Paul	O
Manafort	O
,	O
and	O
former	O
White	O
House	O
National	O
Security	O
Adviser	O
Michael	O
Flynn	O
.	O

White	O
House	O
Restores	O
CNN	O
Acosta	O
’s	O
Pass	O
But	O
Imposes	O
Strict	O
Conduct	O
Rules	O

Thanks	O
to	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
,	O
all	O
White	O
House	O
correspondents	O
have	O
to	O
adhere	O
to	O
the	O
new	O
rules	O
.	O

CNN	O
’s	O
White	O
House	O
correspondent	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
will	O
get	O
his	O
“	O
hard	O
pass	O
”	O
restored	O
,	O
but	O
thanks	O
to	O
his	O
antics	O
and	O
confrontations	O
with	O
President	O
Trump	O
and	O
White	O
House	O
press	O
secretary	O
Sarah	O
Huckabee	O
Sanders	O
,	O
all	O
journalists	O
seeking	O
access	O
to	O
the	O
presidential	O
press	O
room	O
will	O
now	O
have	O
to	O
abide	O
by	O
written	O
rules	O
of	O
conduct	O
due	O
to	O
his	O
misbehavior	B-PROP
.	O

Sanders	O
and	O
deputy	O
chief	O
of	O
staff	O
for	O
communications	O
Bill	O
Shine	O
sent	O
a	O
letter	O
to	O
Acosta	O
on	O
Monday	O
,	O
notifying	O
him	O
that	O
his	O
hard	O
pass	O
was	O
restored	O
,	O
but	O
that	O
it	O
could	O
be	O
suspended	O
or	O
revoked	O
again	O
if	O
he	O
fails	O
to	O
abide	O
by	O
the	O
new	O
rules	O
that	O
apply	O
to	O
all	O
White	O
House	O
correspondents	O
going	O
forward	O
.	O

Under	O
the	O
rules	O
laid	O
out	O
in	O
the	O
letter	O
,	O
each	O
journalist	O
gets	O
“	O
a	O
single	O
question	O
”	O
before	O
having	O
to	O
yield	O
the	O
floor	O
,	O
with	O
follow	O
-	O
ups	O
solely	O
at	O
the	O
discretion	O
of	O
White	O
House	O
officials	O
.	O

Failure	O
to	O
obey	O
the	O
rules	O
may	O
result	O
in	O
suspension	O
or	O
revocation	O
of	O
the	O
“	O
hard	O
pass	O
,	O
”	O
the	O
document	O
allowing	O
major	O
networks	O
regular	O
access	O
to	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
,	O
RT	O
reports	O
.	O

BREAKING	O
NEWS	O
:	O
White	O
House	O
agrees	O
to	O
fully	O
reinstate	O
press	O
pass	O
of	O
CNN	O
's	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
and	O
has	O
set	O
the	O
following	O
rules	O
.	O

pic.twitter.com/xAVa9TJW70	O
—	O
Michael	O
Moates	O
(	O
@freedom_moates	O
)	O
November	O
19	O
,	O
2018	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O

Should	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
have	O
gotten	O
his	O
press	O
pass	O
back	O
?	O

Should	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
have	O
gotten	O
his	O
press	O
pass	O
back	O
?	O

Should	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
have	O
gotten	O
his	O
press	O
pass	O
back	O
?	O

*	O
Yes	O
,	O
he	O
should	O
have	O
gotten	O
it	O
back	O
.	O

No	O
,	O
you	O
ca	O
n't	O
act	O
like	O
a	O
child	O
and	O
keep	O
your	O
pass	O
.	O

Maybe	O
?	O

I	O
'm	O
not	O
sure	O
if	O
he	O
should	O
have	O
.	O

Email	O
*	O

Name	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Truth	O
Uncensored	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

“	O
Should	O
you	O
refuse	O
to	O
follow	O
these	O
rules	O
in	O
the	O
future	O
,	O
we	O
will	O
take	O
action	O
in	O
accordance	O
with	O
the	O
rules	O
,	O
”	O
wrote	O
Sanders	O
and	O
Shine	O
.	O

Acosta	O
’s	O
pass	O
was	O
yanked	O
following	O
an	O
incident	O
at	O
President	O
Donald	O
Trump	O
’s	O
November	O
7	O
press	O
conference	O
,	O
where	O
the	O
CNN	O
correspondent	O
argued	O
with	O
Trump	O
instead	O
of	O
asking	O
questions	O
(	O
not	O
for	O
the	O
first	O
time	O
)	O
and	O
physically	O
prevented	O
a	O
White	O
House	O
intern	O
from	O
taking	O
the	O
microphone	O
away	O
from	O
him	O
.	O

CNN	O
responded	O
by	O
suing	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
,	O
claiming	O
that	O
Acosta	O
’s	O
due	O
process	O
and	O
free	O
speech	O
rights	O
were	O
being	O
infringed	O
.	O

Last	O
week	O
,	O
a	O
federal	O
judge	O
ordered	O
the	O
pass	O
temporarily	O
restored	O
on	O
due	O
process	O
grounds	O
.	O

In	O
response	O
to	O
the	O
letter	O
,	O
CNN	O
dropped	O
the	O
lawsuit	O
.	O

Mainstream	O
media	O
outlets	O
that	O
had	O
joined	O
CNN	O
in	O
suing	O
Trump	O
celebrated	O
Monday	O
’s	O
letter	O
,	O
framing	O
it	O
as	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
“	O
backing	O
down	O
”	O
in	O
face	O
of	O
the	O
legal	O
challenge	O
while	O
largely	O
ignoring	O
the	O
implications	O
of	O
the	O
new	O
rules	O
:	O
that	O
the	B-PROP
media	I-PROP
critical	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
Trump	I-PROP
might	I-PROP
have	I-PROP
won	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
battle	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
but	I-PROP
lost	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
war	I-PROP
.	O

White	O
House	O
backs	O
down	O
from	O
legal	O
fight	O
,	O
restores	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
's	O
press	O
passhttps://t.co/LQoIVgSnCv	O
—	O
AprilDRyan	O
(	O
@AprilDRyan	O
)	O
November	O
19	O
,	O
2018	O

“	O
We	O
have	O
created	O
these	O
rules	O
with	O
a	O
degree	O
of	O
regret	O
,	O
”	O
Sanders	O
and	O
Shine	O
wrote	O
.	O

“	O
But	O
,	O
given	O
the	O
position	O
taken	O
by	O
CNN	O
,	O
we	O
now	O
feel	O
obligated	O
to	O
replace	O
previously	O
shared	O
practices	O
with	O
explicit	O
rules	O
.	O
”	O

This	O
means	O
that	O
Acosta	O
,	O
or	O
any	O
other	O
reporter	O
covering	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
,	O
can	O
get	O
their	O
pass	O
suspended	O
or	O
revoked	O
over	O
specific	O
conduct	O
going	O
forward	O
,	O
without	O
having	O
a	O
leg	O
to	O
stand	O
on	O
in	O
terms	O
of	O
due	O
process	O
.	O

That	O
leaves	O
the	O
First	O
Amendment	O
grounds	O
,	O
effectively	O
arguing	O
that	O
access	O
to	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
is	O
a	O
civil	O
right	O
under	O
the	O
US	O
Constitution	O
,	O
for	O
which	O
there	O
is	O
no	O
precedent	O
under	O
US	O
law	O
.	O

Stacey	O
Abrams	O
to	O
Sue	O
Georgia	O
Over	O
‘	O
Gross	B-PROP
Mismanagement	I-PROP
’	I-PROP
of	O
Elections	O

Stacey	O
Abrams	O
quits	O
race	O
for	O
governor	O
of	O
Georgia	O
,	O
accusing	O
rival	O
Republican	O
Brian	O
Kemp	O
of	O
voter	O
suppression	O
.	O

1.2k	O
SHARES	O
Facebook	O
Twitter	O

Georgia	O
gubernatorial	O
candidate	O
Stacey	O
Abrams	O
may	O
have	O
begrudgingly	O
recognized	O
her	O
rival	O
’s	O
victory	O
,	O
but	O
she	O
is	O
far	O
from	O
done	O
fighting	O
for	O
what	O
she	O
believes	O
was	O
her	O
due	O
.	O

With	O
a	O
team	O
of	O
three	O
dozen	O
lawyers	O
,	O
Abrams	O
has	O
announced	O
she	O
would	O
file	O
a	O
federal	O
suit	O
against	O
Georgia	O
for	O
“	O
gross	B-PROP
mismanagement	I-PROP
”	O
of	O
the	O
vote	O
.	O

Abrams	O
and	O
civil	O
rights	O
groups	O
accused	O
the	O
winner	O
,	O
Republican	O
Brian	O
Kemp	O
of	O
purging	O
thousands	O
from	O
voting	O
rolls	O
in	O
that	O
capacity	O
.	O

Abrams	O
remained	O
about	O
18,000	O
votes	O
short	O
of	O
a	O
result	O
that	O
would	O
have	O
required	O
a	O
runoff	O
between	O
her	O
and	O
Kamp	O
in	O
December	O
.	O

The	O
Associated	O
Press	O
(	O
AP	O
)	O
reported	O
her	O
team	O
amassed	O
nearly	O
three	O
-	O
dozen	O
lawyers	O
who	O
will	O
draft	O
a	O
petition	O
,	O
along	O
with	O
affidavits	O
from	O
voters	O
and	O
would	O
-	O
be	O
voters	O
who	O
argue	O
that	O
they	O
were	O
allegedly	O
disenfranchised	O
during	O
the	O
election	O
.	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O
Should	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
have	O
gotten	O
his	O
press	O
pass	O
back	O
?	O

Should	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
have	O
gotten	O
his	O
press	O
pass	O
back	O
?	O

Should	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
have	O
gotten	O
his	O
press	O
pass	O
back	O
?	O

*	O
Yes	O
,	O
he	O
should	O
have	O
gotten	O
it	O
back	O
.	O

No	O
,	O
you	O
ca	O
n't	O
act	O
like	O
a	O
child	O
and	O
keep	O
your	O
pass	O
.	O

Maybe	O
?	O

I	O
'm	O
not	O
sure	O
if	O
he	O
should	O
have	O
.	O

Email	O
*	O

Email	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Truth	O
Uncensored	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

“	O
In	O
the	O
coming	O
days	O
,	O
we	O
will	O
be	O
filing	O
a	O
major	O
federal	O
lawsuit	O
against	O
the	O
state	O
of	O
Georgia	O
for	O
the	O
gross	B-PROP
mismanagement	I-PROP
of	O
this	O
election	O
and	O
to	O
protect	O
future	O
elections	O
from	O
unconstitutional	O
actions	O
,	O
”	O
Abrams	O
said	O
,	O
though	O
she	O
gave	O
no	O
details	O
.	O

In	O
the	O
coming	O
days	O
,	O
we	O
will	O
be	O
filing	O
a	O
major	O
federal	O
lawsuit	O
against	O
the	O
state	O
of	O
Georgia	O
for	O
the	O
gross	B-PROP
mismanagement	I-PROP
of	O
this	O
election	O
and	O
to	O
protect	O
future	O
elections	O
from	O
unconstitutional	O
actions	O
.	O

#	O
gapol	O
—	O
Stacey	O
Abrams	O
(	O
@staceyabrams	O
)	O
November	O
17	O
,	O
2018	O

In	O
a	O
speech	O
on	O
Nov.	O
19	O
right	O
at	O
the	O
cutoff	O
for	O
Georgia	O
counties	O
to	O
certify	O
election	O
results	O
,	O
Abrams	O
delivered	O
a	O
speech	O
in	O
which	O
she	O
said	O
,	O
“	O
I	O
acknowledge	O
that	O
former	O
Secretary	O
of	O
State	O
Brian	O
Kemp	O
will	O
be	O
certified	O
as	O
the	O
victor	O
in	O
the	O
2018	O
gubernatorial	O
election	O
.	O
”	O
However	O
,	O
Abrams	O
said	O
Kemp	O
had	O
relied	O
on	O
“	O
suppression	O
of	O
the	O
people	O
’s	O
democratic	O
right	O
to	O
vote	O
”	O
that	O
was	O
“	O
deliberate	O
and	O
intentional	O
.	O
”	O

Kemp	O
tried	O
to	O
move	O
past	O
the	O
contentious	O
campaign	O
even	O
if	O
his	O
opponent	O
was	O
n’t	O
willing	O
.	O

“	O
The	O
election	O
is	O
over	O
and	O
hardworking	B-PROP
Georgians	I-PROP
are	O
ready	O
to	O
move	O
forward	O
,	O
”	O
he	O
said	O
.	O

“	O
We	O
can	O
no	O
longer	O
dwell	O
on	O
the	O
divisive	B-PROP
politics	O
of	O
the	O
past	O
but	O
must	O
focus	O
on	O
Georgia	O
’s	O
bright	B-PROP
and	I-PROP
promising	I-PROP
future	O
.	O
”	O

The	O
election	O
is	O
over	O
and	O
hardworking	B-PROP
Georgians	I-PROP
are	O
ready	O
to	O
move	O
forward	O
.	O

We	O
can	O
no	O
longer	O
dwell	O
on	O
the	O
divisive	B-PROP
politics	O
of	O
the	O
past	O
but	O
must	O
focus	O
on	O
Georgia	O
’s	O
bright	B-PROP
and	I-PROP
promising	I-PROP
future	I-PROP
.	O

#	O
gapol	O
(	O
1	O
of	O
3	O
)	O
—	O
Brian	O
Kemp	O
(	O
@BrianKempGA	O
)	O
November	O
16	O
,	O
2018	O

Breitbart	O
reports	O
:	O

Abrams	O
could	O
decide	O
as	O
early	O
as	O
Friday	O
whether	O
to	O
go	O
to	O
court	O
.	O

Under	O
Georgia	O
election	O
law	O
,	O
a	O
losing	O
candidate	O
can	O
challenge	O
the	O
result	O
of	O
an	O
election	O
based	O
on	O
“	O
misconduct	O
,	O
fraud	O
or	O
irregularities	O
…	O
sufficient	O
to	O
change	O
or	O
place	O
in	O
doubt	O
the	O
results	O
.	O
”	O

Allegra	O
Lawrence	O
-	O
Hardy	O
,	O
Abrams	O
’	O
campaign	O
chair	O
,	O
said	O
that	O
her	O
legal	O
team	O
is	O
“	O
considering	O
all	O
options	O
,	O
”	O
which	O
also	O
includes	O
federal	O
court	O
remedies	O
.	O

Some	O
Democratic	O
legal	O
observers	O
note	O
Abrams	O
would	O
be	O
dependent	O
on	O
statues	O
that	O
set	O
a	O
high	O
bar	O
for	O
the	O
court	O
to	O
intervene	O
.	O

Abrams	O
Republican	O
challenger	O
,	O
Georgia	O
Secretary	O
of	O
State	O
Brian	O
Kemp	O
,	O
has	O
held	O
the	O
lead	O
and	O
is	O
expected	O
to	O
be	O
declared	O
the	O
winner	O
on	O
Friday	O
,	O
charged	O
that	O
Abrams	O
has	O
led	O
a	B-PROP
“	I-PROP
publicity	I-PROP
stunt	I-PROP
”	O
and	O
her	O
refusal	O
to	O
concede	O
the	O
election	O
serves	O
as	O
a	O
“	O
ridiculous	B-PROP
temper	I-PROP
tantrum	I-PROP
.	O
”	O

Abrams	O
faces	O
a	O
narrow	O
path	O
to	O
winning	O
the	O
Georgia	O
gubernatorial	O
election	O
.	O

Preliminary	O
election	O
results	O
show	O
Kemp	O
winning	O
with	O
about	O
50.2	O
percent	O
of	O
the	O
vote	O
,	O
which	O
puts	O
him	O
with	O
over	O
18,000	O
voters	O
over	O
the	O
threshold	O
required	O
to	O
win	O
by	O
a	O
majority	O
and	O
avoid	O
a	O
December	O
4	O
election	O
runoff	O
.	O

Lawrence	O
-	O
Hardy	O
told	O
the	O
AP	O
that	O
Abrams	O
believes	O
that	O
many	O
of	O
her	O
supporters	O
,	O
many	O
of	O
them	O
minority	O
and	O
low	O
-	O
income	O
voters	O
who	O
do	O
not	O
regularly	O
vote	O
,	O
went	O
to	O
the	O
polls	O
and	O
ran	O
into	O
electoral	O
barriers	O
,	O
although	O
she	O
did	O
not	O
say	O
what	O
barriers	O
they	O
were	O
.	O

“	O
These	O
stories	O
to	O
me	O
are	O
such	O
that	O
they	O
have	O
to	O
be	O
addressed	O
,	O
”	O
said	O
Lawrence	O
-	O
Hardy	O
.	O

“	O
It	B-PROP
’s	I-PROP
just	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
much	I-PROP
bigger	I-PROP
responsibility	I-PROP
.	O

I	O
feel	O
like	O
our	O
mandate	O
has	O
blossomed	O
.	O

…	O
Maybe	O
this	O
is	O
our	O
moment	O
.	O
”	O

CNN	O
Sues	O
Trump	O
Demanding	O
He	O
Restore	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
’s	O
White	O
House	O
Credential	O

CNN	O
sues	O
President	O
Trump	O
and	O
top	O
White	O
House	O
aides	O
for	O
barring	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
.	O

557	O
SHARES	O
Facebook	O
Twitter	O

CNN	O
has	O
filed	O
a	O
lawsuit	O
against	O
the	O
Trump	O
administration	O
over	O
the	O
revocation	O
of	O
press	O
credentials	O
from	O
its	O
reporter	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
demanding	O
they	O
be	O
restored	O
.	O

The	O
suit	O
alleges	O
the	O
ban	O
violated	O
both	O
First	O
and	O
Fifth	O
Amendment	O
rights	O
of	O
the	O
network	O
and	O
reporter	O
.	O

Last	O
Wednesday	O
White	O
House	O
press	O
secretary	O
Sarah	O
Sanders	O
made	O
the	O
announcement	O
that	O
Acosta	O
’s	O
press	O
pass	O
had	O
been	O
suspended	O
as	O
a	O
result	O
of	O
an	O
altercation	B-PROP
during	O
a	O
press	O
conference	O
when	O
Acosta	O
refused	O
to	O
give	O
up	O
the	O
microphone	O
after	O
several	O
requests	O
by	O
President	O
Trump	O
to	O
hand	O
it	O
over	O
.	O

Not	O
only	O
did	O
Acosta	O
refuse	O
to	O
hand	O
over	O
the	O
microphone	O
,	O
but	O
he	O
pushed	O
the	O
female	O
interns	O
hand	O
away	O
when	O
she	O
tried	O
to	O
follow	O
the	O
presidents	O
request	O
to	O
take	O
the	O
microphone	O
away	O
from	O
Acosta	O
,	O
who	O
has	O
disputed	O
the	O
accusation	O
claiming	O
he	O
never	O
put	O
his	O
hands	O
on	O
the	O
young	O
woman	O
.	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O
Should	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
have	O
gotten	O
his	O
press	O
pass	O
back	O
?	O

Should	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
have	O
gotten	O
his	O
press	O
pass	O
back	O
?	O

Should	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
have	O
gotten	O
his	O
press	O
pass	O
back	O
?	O

*	O
Yes	O
,	O
he	O
should	O
have	O
gotten	O
it	O
back	O
.	O

No	O
,	O
you	O
ca	O
n't	O
act	O
like	O
a	O
child	O
and	O
keep	O
your	O
pass	O
.	O

Maybe	O
?	O

I	O
'm	O
not	O
sure	O
if	O
he	O
should	O
have	O
.	O

Email	O
*	O

Phone	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Truth	O
Uncensored	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

Watching	O
the	O
full	O
exchange	O
it	O
is	O
obvious	O
that	O
Trump	O
was	O
making	O
a	O
sincere	O
effort	O
to	O
answer	O
Acosta	O
’s	O
questions	O
,	O
the	O
president	O
actually	O
took	O
the	O
time	O
to	O
answer	O
three	O
of	O
his	O
questions	O
before	O
losing	O
his	O
patients	O
with	O
an	O
argumentative	O
Acosta	O
who	O
refused	O
to	O
hand	O
the	O
mic	O
over	O
to	O
the	O
female	O
intern	O
forcefully	O
pushing	O
her	O
arm	O
away	O
.	O

Acosta	O
can	O
deny	O
how	O
the	O
altercation	B-PROP
took	O
place	O
,	O
but	O
the	O
video	O
shows	O
the	O
facts	O
,	O
which	O
are	O
that	O
Acosta	O
was	O
out	O
of	O
line	O
.	O

The	O
lawsuit	O
was	O
announced	O
by	O
CNN	O
on	O
Tuesday	O
.	O

The	O
network	O
is	O
also	O
asking	O
the	O
court	O
for	O
an	O
“	O
immediate	O
restraining	O
order	O
requiring	O
the	O
pass	O
be	O
returned	O
to	O
Jim	O
.	O
”	O

Both	O
CNN	O
and	O
Acosta	O
are	O
plaintiffs	O
in	O
the	O
lawsuit	O
,	O
and	O
there	O
are	O
six	O
defendants	O
:	O
Donald	O
Trump	O
himself	O
,	O
White	O
House	O
Press	O
Secretary	O
Sarah	O
Sanders	O
,	O
Chief	O
of	O
Staff	O
John	O
Kelly	O
,	O
his	O
aide	O
for	O
communication	O
Bill	O
Shine	O
,	O
Secret	O
Service	O
Director	O
Joseph	O
Clancy	O
,	O
and	O
the	O
unidentified	O
Secret	O
Service	O
officer	O
who	O
took	O
the	O
pass	O
from	O
Acosta	O
.	O

Fox	O
News	O
reports	O
:	O

“	O
The	O
wrongful	O
revocation	O
of	O
these	O
credentials	O
violates	O
CNN	O
and	O
Acosta	O
’s	O
First	O
Amendment	O
rights	O
of	O
freedom	O
of	O
the	O
press	O
,	O
and	O
their	O
Fifth	O
Amendment	O
rights	O
to	O
due	O
process	O
,	O
”	O
CNN	O
said	O
in	O
a	O
statement	O
.	O

“	O
We	O
have	O
asked	O
the	O
court	O
for	O
an	O
immediate	O
restraining	O
order	O
requiring	O
the	O
pass	O
to	O
be	O
returned	O
to	O
Jim	O
,	O
and	O
will	O
seek	O
permanent	O
relief	O
as	O
part	O
of	O
this	O
process	O
.	O
”	O

CNN	O
added	O
that	O
“	O
the	O
suit	O
is	O
specific	O
to	O
CNN	O
and	O
Acosta	O
,	O
”	O
but	O
said	O
it	O
could	O
happen	O
to	O
anyone	O
.	O

“	O
If	O
left	O
unchallenged	O
,	O
the	O
actions	O
of	O
the	O
White	O
house	O
would	O
create	O
a	B-PROP
dangerous	I-PROP
chilling	I-PROP
effect	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
any	I-PROP
journalist	I-PROP
who	I-PROP
covers	I-PROP
our	B-PROP
elected	I-PROP
officials	I-PROP
,	O
”	O
CNN	O
said	O
.	O

This	O
morning	O
,	O
CNN	O
filed	O
a	O
lawsuit	O
against	O
@realDonaldTrump	O
and	O
top	O
aides	O
.	O

The	O
White	O
House	O
has	O
violated	O
CNN	O
and	O
@Acosta	O
's	O
First	O
Amendment	O
rights	O
of	O
freedom	O
of	O
the	O
press	O
and	O
Fifth	O
Amendment	O
rights	O
to	O
due	O
process	O
.	O

Complaint	O
:	O
https://t.co/43oX6L8xA7	O
pic.twitter.com/RvJ0Cgh6oi	O
—	O
CNN	O
Communications	O
(	O
@CNNPR	O
)	O
November	O
13	O
,	O
2018	O

The	O
White	O
House	O
did	O
not	O
immediately	O
respond	O
to	O
a	O
request	O
for	O
comment	O
.	O

Last	O
week	O
,	O
Acosta	O
’s	O
press	O
pass	O
to	O
access	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
was	O
suspended	O
“	O
until	O
further	O
notice	O
”	O
after	O
he	O
engaged	O
in	O
the	O
contentious	B-PROP
back	O
-	O
and	O
-	O
forth	O
over	O
the	O
migrant	O
caravan	O
working	O
its	O
way	O
up	O
through	O
Mexico	O
.	O

Trump	O
characterizes	O
the	O
caravan	O
as	O
“	O
an	O
invasion	B-PROP
,	O
”	O
a	O
term	O
to	O
which	O
Acosta	O
objected	O
.	O

“	O
Honestly	O
,	O
I	O
think	O
you	O
should	O
let	O
me	O
run	O
the	O
country	O
and	O
you	O
run	O
CNN	O
,	O
”	O
the	O
president	O
said	O
.	O

The	O
reporter	O
tried	O
to	O
ask	O
him	O
another	O
question	O
before	O
a	O
female	O
White	O
House	O
aide	O
walked	O
over	O
to	O
him	O
.	O

Trump	O
then	O
told	O
him	O
,	O
“	O
That	B-PROP
’s	I-PROP
enough	I-PROP
!	O
”	O

Acosta	O
continued	O
to	O
try	O
to	O
talk	O
as	O
the	O
intern	O
was	O
seen	O
trying	O
to	O
take	O
the	O
microphone	O
from	O
his	O
hand	O
.	O

She	O
grabbed	O
the	O
microphone	O
but	O
Acosta	O
would	O
n’t	O
give	O
it	O
up	O
and	O
there	O
was	O
brief	O
contact	O
between	O
the	O
two	O
.	O

White	O
House	O
Press	O
Secretary	O
Sarah	O
Sanders	O
said	O
the	O
suspension	O
of	O
his	O
press	O
credentials	O
stemmed	O
from	O
his	O
“	O
placing	O
his	O
hands	O
on	O
a	O
young	O
woman	O
just	O
trying	O
to	O
do	O
her	O
job	O
as	O
a	O
White	O
House	O
intern	O
.	O
”	O
She	O
called	O
the	O
behavior	O
“	O
absolutely	B-PROP
unacceptable	I-PROP
.	O
”	O

Several	O
news	O
outlets	O
accused	O
Sanders	O
of	O
using	O
a	O
“	O
doctored	B-PROP
”	I-PROP
video	I-PROP
as	O
evidence	O
,	O
but	O
the	O
press	O
secretary	O
did	O
n’t	O
back	O
down	O
from	O
her	O
decision	O
.	O

“	O
We	O
stand	O
by	O
our	O
decision	O
to	O
revoke	O
this	O
individual	O
’s	O
hard	O
pass	O
.	O

We	O
will	O
not	O
tolerate	O
the	O
inappropriate	O
behavior	O
clearly	O
documented	O
in	O
this	O
video	O
,	O
”	O
Sanders	O
tweeted	O
to	O
accompany	O
the	O
allegedly	O
doctored	O
video	O
.	O

White	O
House	O
Counselor	O
Kellyanne	O
Conway	O
has	O
since	O
said	O
the	O
video	O
was	O
simply	O
“	O
sped	O
up	O
.	O
”	O

An	O
attorney	O
for	O
CNN	O
and	O
Acosta	O
followed	O
up	O
with	O
a	O
separate	O
statement	O
,	O
saying	O
the	O
law	O
is	O
“	O
clear	O
”	O
that	O
the	O
Trump	O
administration	O
violated	O
the	O
First	O
Amendment	O
and	O
Due	O
process	O
Clause	O
.	O

Report	O
:	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
and	O
CNN	O
File	O
Lawsuit	O
Against	O
Trump	O
Administration	O

CNN	O
is	O
taking	O
the	O
ongoing	O
feud	B-PROP
between	O
President	O
Trump	O
and	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
to	O
court	O
.	O

Appearing	O
on	O
CNN	O
’s	O
“	O
Reliable	O
Sources	O
”	O
this	O
Sunday	O
,	O
ABC	O
’s	O
former	O
White	O
House	O
correspondent	O
Sam	O
Donaldson	O
made	O
the	O
claim	O
that	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
and	O
CNN	O
had	O
already	O
filed	O
a	O
lawsuit	O
against	O
the	O
Trump	O
administration	O
over	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
’s	O
decision	O
to	O
revoke	O
the	O
reporter	O
’s	O
press	O
pass	O
.	O

It	O
appears	O
that	O
CNN	O
is	O
setting	O
the	O
wheels	O
in	O
motion	O
for	O
a	O
lawsuit	O
against	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
for	O
removing	O
the	O
press	O
credentials	O
of	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
following	O
a	O
tense	O
incident	O
Wednesday	O
during	O
a	O
news	O
conference	O
at	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
.	O

“	O
I	O
hope	O
I	O
’m	O
not	O
mistaken	O
,	O
but	O
it	O
’s	O
my	O
understanding	O
that	O
CNN	O
and	O
Acosta	O
have	O
sued	O
,	O
that	O
there	O
will	O
be	O
a	O
court	O
hearing	O
on	O
Tuesday	O
on	O
this	O
very	O
matter	O
that	O
we	O
’ve	O
been	O
discussing	O
,	O
”	O
Donaldson	O
said	O
.	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O

Should	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
have	O
gotten	O
his	O
press	O
pass	O
back	O
?	O

Should	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
have	O
gotten	O
his	O
press	O
pass	O
back	O
?	O

Should	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
have	O
gotten	O
his	O
press	O
pass	O
back	O
?	O

*	O
Yes	O
,	O
he	O
should	O
have	O
gotten	O
it	O
back	O
.	O

No	O
,	O
you	O
ca	O
n't	O
act	O
like	O
a	O
child	O
and	O
keep	O
your	O
pass	O
.	O

Maybe	O
?	O

I	O
'm	O
not	O
sure	O
if	O
he	O
should	O
have	O
.	O

Email	O
*	O

Email	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Truth	O
Uncensored	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

Donaldson	O
claims	O
that	O
he	O
has	O
already	O
been	O
asked	O
to	O
prepare	O
an	O
affidavit	O
to	O
be	O
submitted	O
to	O
court	O
,	O
likely	O
due	O
to	O
Donaldson	O
’s	O
own	O
reputation	O
for	O
confrontation	O
with	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
,	O
including	O
trading	O
personal	O
insults	O
with	O
President	O
George	O
Bush	O
in	O
2006	O
,	O
RT	O
reports	O
.	O

Donaldson	O
also	O
said	O
that	O
he	O
had	O
sent	O
Acosta	O
an	O
email	O
which	O
encouraged	O
him	O
to	O
‘	O
Keep	O
it	O
up	O
”	O
,	O
and	O
not	O
to	O
worry	O
about	O
the	O
“	O
vicious	B-PROP
attacks	I-PROP
”	O
and	O
“	O
threats	O
”	O
.	O

CNN	O
released	O
a	O
statement	O
saying	O
no	O
decision	O
has	O
been	O
made	O
as	O
of	O
yet	O
on	O
the	O
lawsuit	O
.	O

The	O
network	O
has	O
reached	O
out	O
to	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
on	O
the	O
issue	O
but	O
has	O
“	O
gotten	O
no	O
response	O
”	O
.	O

Sunday	O
’s	O
“	O
Reliable	O
Sources	O
”	O
also	O
featured	O
constitutional	O
lawyer	O
Floyd	O
Mayweather	O
who	O
emphasized	O
that	O
CNN	O
would	O
have	O
a	O
“	O
really	O
strong	O
lawsuit	O
”	O
if	O
they	O
chose	O
to	O
proceed	O
.	O

Last	O
Wednesday	O
White	O
House	O
press	O
secretary	O
Sarah	O
Sanders	O
made	O
the	O
announcement	O
that	O
Acosta	O
’s	O
press	O
pass	O
had	O
been	O
suspended	O
as	O
a	O
result	O
of	O
a	O
tussle	O
with	O
a	O
White	O
House	O
intern	O
over	O
a	O
microphone	O
following	O
his	O
sharp	O
back	O
-	O
and	O
-	O
forth	O
with	O
Trump	O
during	O
the	O
President	O
’s	O
post	O
-	O
midterm	O
Q&A.	O

Acosta	O
has	O
disputed	O
the	O
accusation	O
claiming	O
he	O
never	O
put	O
his	O
hands	O
on	O
the	O
young	O
woman	O
.	O

Watching	O
the	O
full	O
exchange	O
it	O
is	O
obvious	O
that	O
President	O
Trump	O
was	O
making	O
a	O
sincere	O
effort	O
to	O
answer	O
Acosta	O
’s	O
questions	O
,	O
the	O
president	O
actually	O
took	O
the	O
time	O
to	O
answer	O
three	O
of	O
his	O
questions	O
before	O
rightfully	O
losing	O
his	O
patients	O
when	O
Acosta	O
refused	O
to	O
hand	O
the	O
mic	O
over	O
.	O

Not	O
only	O
that	O
,	O
he	O
used	O
his	O
hand	O
to	O
forcefully	O
push	O
the	O
female	O
interns	O
arm	O
away	O
from	O
the	O
mic	O
.	O

Acosta	O
should	O
have	O
been	O
escorted	O
from	O
the	O
room	O
.	O

He	O
deserved	O
to	O
have	O
his	O
credentials	O
revoked	O
.	O

White	O
House	O
Outlines	O
Code	O
Of	O
Conduct	O
For	O
White	O
House	O
Press	O
-	O
If	O
Those	O
Do	O
n't	O
Work	O
,	O
They	O
'll	O
Be	O
Forced	O
To	O
Write	O
More	O

For	O
any	O
constitutionalist	O
,	O
the	O
ruling	O
by	O
Trump	B-PROP
-	I-PROP
appointed	I-PROP
Judge	I-PROP
Timothy	I-PROP
J.	O
Kelly	O
was	O
nothing	O
but	O
surreal	O
,	O
and	O
honestly	O
,	O
he	B-PROP
should	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
impeached	I-PROP
over	I-PROP
his	I-PROP
frivolous	I-PROP
ruling	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
demanded	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
reinstate	O
CNN	O
reporter	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
's	O
press	O
pass	O
.	O

However	O
,	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
has	O
decided	O
to	O
comply	O
,	O
which	O
I	O
wonder	O
just	B-PROP
how	I-PROP
dangerous	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
precedent	I-PROP
this	I-PROP
sets	I-PROP
,	O
and	O
as	O
a	O
result	O
,	O
White	O
House	O
Press	O
Secretary	O
Sarah	O
Sanders	O
has	O
issued	O
a	O
code	O
of	O
conduct	O
for	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
press	O
.	O

We	O
have	O
created	O
these	O
rules	O
with	O
a	O
degree	O
of	O
regret	O
,	O
”	O
Sanders	O
said	O
in	O
a	O
statement	O
.	O

The	O
fact	O
that	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
submitted	O
to	O
such	O
a	O
ridiculous	B-PROP
demand	O
when	O
it	O
is	O
simple	O
human	O
decency	O
to	O
conduct	O
one	O
's	O
self	O
in	O
a	O
proper	O
manner	O
,	O
unlike	O
how	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
treated	O
both	O
Sarah	O
Sanders	O
,	O
President	O
Donald	O
Trump	O
and	O
a	O
White	O
House	O
aide	O
,	O
is	O
a	B-PROP
testimony	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
how	I-PROP
little	I-PROP
those	I-PROP
who	I-PROP
represent	I-PROP
us	I-PROP
know	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
our	I-PROP
Constitution	I-PROP
.	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O

Should	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
have	O
gotten	O
his	O
press	O
pass	O
back	O
?	O

Should	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
have	O
gotten	O
his	O
press	O
pass	O
back	O
?	O

Should	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
have	O
gotten	O
his	O
press	O
pass	O
back	O
?	O

*	O
Yes	O
,	O
he	O
should	O
have	O
gotten	O
it	O
back	O
.	O

No	O
,	O
you	O
ca	O
n't	O
act	O
like	O
a	O
child	O
and	O
keep	O
your	O
pass	O
.	O

Maybe	O
?	O

I	O
'm	O
not	O
sure	O
if	O
he	O
should	O
have	O
.	O

Email	O
*	O

Email	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Freedom	O
Outpost	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

“	O
We	O
would	O
have	O
greatly	O
preferred	O
to	O
continue	O
hosting	O
White	O
House	O
press	O
conferences	O
in	O
reliance	O
on	O
a	O
set	O
of	O
understood	O
professional	O
norms	O
,	O
and	O
we	O
believe	O
the	O
overwhelming	O
majority	O
of	O
journalists	O
covering	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
share	O
that	O
preference	O
,	O
”	O
Sanders	O
said	O
.	O

“	O
But	O
,	O
given	O
the	O
position	O
taken	O
by	O
CNN	O
,	O
we	O
now	O
feel	O
obligated	O
to	O
replace	O
previously	O
shared	O
practices	O
with	O
explicit	O
rules	O
.	O
”	O

Oh	B-PROP
,	I-PROP
but	I-PROP
there	I-PROP
's	I-PROP
more	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

If	B-PROP
journalists	I-PROP
ca	I-PROP
n't	I-PROP
conduct	I-PROP
themselves	I-PROP
according	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
these	I-PROP
rules	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
then	I-PROP
there	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
no	I-PROP
other	I-PROP
option	I-PROP
but	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
....	I-PROP
write	I-PROP
more	I-PROP
explicit	I-PROP
rules	I-PROP
!	O

Seriously	B-PROP
!	O

“	O
At	O
this	O
time	O
,	O
however	O
,	O
we	O
have	O
decided	O
not	O
to	O
frame	O
such	O
rules	O
in	O
the	O
hope	O
that	O
professional	O
journalistic	O
norms	O
will	O
suffice	O
to	O
regulate	O
conduct	O
in	O
those	O
places	O
,	O
”	O
Sanders	O
said	O
.	O

“	O
If	O
unprofessional	O
behavior	O
occurs	O
in	O
those	O
settings	O
,	O
or	O
if	O
a	O
court	O
should	O
decide	O
that	O
explicit	O
rules	O
are	O
required	O
to	O
regulate	O
conduct	O
there	O
,	O
we	O
will	O
be	O
forced	O
to	O
reconsider	O
this	O
decision	O
.	O
”	O

The	B-PROP
White	I-PROP
House	I-PROP
should	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
telling	I-PROP
Judge	I-PROP
Kelly	I-PROP
where	I-PROP
he	I-PROP
can	I-PROP
take	I-PROP
his	I-PROP
ruling	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
but	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
are	I-PROP
trying	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
look	I-PROP
like	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
are	I-PROP
on	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
high	I-PROP
ground	I-PROP
while	I-PROP
submitting	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
unconstitutional	I-PROP
rulings	I-PROP
from	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
federal	I-PROP
judge	I-PROP
who	I-PROP
should	I-PROP
know	I-PROP
better	I-PROP
.	O

However	O
,	O
here	O
are	O
the	O
new	O
rules	O
released	O
by	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
Press	O
Office	O
.	O

(	O
1	O
)	O
A	O
journalist	O
called	O
upon	O
to	O
ask	O
a	O
question	O
will	O
ask	O
a	O
single	O
question	O
and	O
then	O
will	O
yield	O
the	O
floor	O
to	O
other	O
journalists	O
;	O
(	O
2	O
)	O
At	O
the	O
discretion	O
of	O
the	O
President	O
or	O
other	O
White	O
House	O
official	O
taking	O
questions	O
,	O
a	O
follow	O
-	O
up	O
question	O
or	O
questions	O
may	O
be	O
permitted	O
;	O
and	O
where	O
a	O
follow	O
up	O
has	O
been	O
allowed	O
and	O
asked	O
,	O
the	O
questioner	O
will	O
then	O
yield	O
the	O
floor	O
;	O
(	O
3	O
)	O
“	O
Yielding	O
the	O
floor	O
”	O
includes	O
,	O
when	O
applicable	O
,	O
physically	O
surrendering	O
the	O
microphone	O
to	O
White	O
House	O
staff	O
for	O
use	O
by	O
the	O
next	O
questioner	O
;	O
(	O
4	O
)	O
Failure	O
to	O
abide	O
by	O
any	O
of	O
rules	O
(	O
1)-(3	O
)	O
may	O
result	O
in	O
suspension	O
or	O
revocation	O
of	O
the	O
journalist	O
’s	O
hard	O
pass	O
.	O

I	O
can	O
see	O
this	O
going	O
way	O
downhill	O
.	O

If	O
you	O
want	O
to	O
deal	O
with	O
people	O
like	O
Acosta	O
,	O
at	O
the	O
moment	O
they	O
begin	O
to	O
show	O
who	O
and	O
what	O
they	O
really	O
are	O
,	O
stop	O
calling	O
on	O
them	O
for	O
questions	O
.	O

This	O
is	O
my	O
advice	O
to	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
.	O

Do	O
n't	O
call	O
on	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
another	O
time	O
for	O
as	O
long	O
as	O
he	O
remains	O
in	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
Press	O
.	O

Make	B-PROP
him	I-PROP
regret	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
entire	I-PROP
time	I-PROP
he	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
there	I-PROP
.	O

Sore	B-PROP
Loser	I-PROP
:	O
Stacey	O
Abrams	O
Ends	O
Challenges	O
In	O
Georgia	O
Gubernatorial	O
Race	O
-	O
Wo	O
n't	O
Concede	O
-	O
Set	O
To	O
File	O
Lawsuit	O

Defeated	O
Georgia	O
gubernatorial	O
candidate	O
Stacey	O
Abrams	O
finally	O
ended	O
her	O
challenges	O
on	O
Friday	O
and	O
ended	O
her	O
challenges	O
against	O
Republican	O
opponent	O
Brian	O
Kemp	O
.	O

However	O
,	O
in	O
the	O
same	O
breath	O
that	O
she	O
ended	O
the	O
challenges	O
,	O
she	O
also	O
declared	O
she	O
would	O
be	O
filing	O
a	O
federal	O
lawsuit	O
over	O
what	O
she	O
called	O
"	O
gross	B-PROP
mismanagement	I-PROP
"	O
of	O
elections	O
.	O

If	O
you	O
ask	O
me	O
,	O
all	B-PROP
she	I-PROP
's	I-PROP
looking	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
here	I-PROP
will	I-PROP
only	I-PROP
hurt	I-PROP
herself	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
her	I-PROP
own	I-PROP
party	I-PROP
.	O

This	B-PROP
woman	I-PROP
would	I-PROP
n't	I-PROP
even	I-PROP
concede	I-PROP
!	O

Talk	O
about	O
a	B-PROP
poor	I-PROP
sport	I-PROP
,	O
but	O
Democrats	O
are	O
often	O
like	O
that	O
in	O
these	O
races	O
.	O

The	O
Atlanta	O
Journal	O
-	O
Constitution	O
reported	O
:	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O
Should	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
have	O
gotten	O
his	O
press	O
pass	O
back	O
?	O

Should	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
have	O
gotten	O
his	O
press	O
pass	O
back	O
?	O

Should	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
have	O
gotten	O
his	O
press	O
pass	O
back	O
?	O

*	O
Yes	O
,	O
he	O
should	O
have	O
gotten	O
it	O
back	O
.	O

No	O
,	O
you	O
ca	O
n't	O
act	O
like	O
a	O
child	O
and	O
keep	O
your	O
pass	O
.	O

Maybe	O
?	O

I	O
'm	O
not	O
sure	O
if	O
he	O
should	O
have	O
.	O

Email	O
*	O

Comments	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Freedom	O
Outpost	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

Stacey	O
Abrams	O
ended	O
her	O
run	O
for	O
Georgia	O
governor	O
on	O
Friday	O
,	O
but	O
the	O
Democrat	B-PROP
said	O
she	O
would	O
not	O
concede	O
the	O
contest	O
to	O
Republican	O
Brian	O
Kemp	O
and	O
planned	O
to	O
launch	O
a	O
voting	O
rights	O
group	O
to	O
file	O
“	O
major	O
”	O
litigation	O
challenging	O
election	O
policies	O
.	O

As	O
state	O
officials	O
prepare	O
to	O
certify	O
the	O
vote	O
,	O
Abrams	O
acknowledged	O
the	O
law	O
“	O
allows	O
no	O
further	O
viable	O
remedy	O
”	O
to	O
extend	O
her	O
quest	O
to	O
be	O
the	O
nation	O
’s	O
first	O
black	O
female	O
governor	O
.	O

But	O
she	O
laced	O
her	O
speech	O
with	O
biting	B-PROP
criticism	I-PROP
of	O
Kemp	O
,	O
who	O
she	O
accused	O
of	O
leveraging	B-PROP
his	I-PROP
role	I-PROP
as	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
state	I-PROP
’s	I-PROP
top	I-PROP
elections	I-PROP
official	I-PROP
to	O
suppress	O
voters	O
.	O

“	O
I	O
will	O
not	O
concede	O
,	O
”	O
she	O
added	O
,	O
“	O
because	O
the	B-PROP
erosion	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
our	I-PROP
democracy	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
not	I-PROP
right	I-PROP
.	I-PROP
”	O

You	O
mean	O
like	O
having	O
a	O
sister	O
waiting	O
in	O
the	O
wings	O
of	O
any	O
campaign	O
lawsuits	O
,	O
Ms.	O
Abrams	O
?	O

What	O
about	O
invalid	O
provisional	O
ballots	O
getting	O
mixed	O
in	O
with	O
valid	O
ones	O
?	O

Maybe	O
a	O
little	O
electronic	O
voter	O
manipulation	O
,	O
Ms.	O
Abrams	O
?	O

How	O
about	O
non	O
-	O
citizens	O
and	O
illegal	O
aliens	O
voting	O
,	O
Ms.	O
Abrams	O
?	O

Are	B-PROP
these	I-PROP
evidence	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
erosion	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
democratic	I-PROP
process	I-PROP
?	I-PROP

Sure	O
they	O
are	O
and	O
they	O
appear	O
to	O
all	O
be	O
coming	O
from	O
the	O
party	O
that	O
Stacey	O
Abrams	O
represents	O
,	O
but	O
she	O
's	O
not	O
going	O
to	O
talk	O
about	O
that	O
.	O

But	O
she	O
was	O
n't	O
going	O
to	O
concede	O
.	O

Nope	O
,	O
that	O
arrogant	B-PROP
wanna	I-PROP
-	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
first	I-PROP
female	I-PROP
governor	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
Georgia	I-PROP
simply	O
would	O
not	O
bow	O
out	O
gracefully	O
.	O

“	O
To	B-PROP
watch	I-PROP
an	I-PROP
elected	I-PROP
official	I-PROP
who	I-PROP
claims	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
represent	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
this	I-PROP
state	I-PROP
baldly	I-PROP
pin	I-PROP
his	I-PROP
hopes	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
election	I-PROP
on	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
suppression	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
’s	I-PROP
democratic	I-PROP
right	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
vote	I-PROP
has	I-PROP
been	I-PROP
truly	I-PROP
appalling	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
”	I-PROP
Abrams	O
said	O
.	O

“	O
So	O
,	O
let	O
’s	O
be	O
clear	O
,	O
"	O
she	O
continued	O
.	O

"	O
This	O
is	O
not	O
a	O
speech	O
of	O
concession	O
.	O

Because	O
concession	O
means	O
to	O
acknowledge	O
an	O
action	O
is	O
right	O
,	O
true	O
or	O
proper	O
.	O

As	O
a	O
woman	O
of	O
conscience	O
and	O
faith	O
,	O
I	O
can	O
not	O
concede	O
that	O
.	O

But	O
my	O
assessment	O
is	O
the	O
law	O
currently	O
allows	O
no	O
further	O
viable	O
remedy	O
.	O
”	O

No	O
,	O
concession	O
means	O
"	O
a	O
thing	O
that	O
is	O
granted	O
,	O
especially	O
in	O
response	O
to	O
demands	O
;	O
a	O
thing	O
conceded	O
.	O
"	O

Abrams	O
was	O
easily	O
defeated	O
in	O
terms	O
of	O
votes	O
.	O

She	O
was	O
the	O
one	O
trying	O
to	O
"	O
find	O
"	O
and	O
count	O
votes	O
remember	O
?	O

She	O
is	O
the	O
one	O
claiming	O
there	O
was	O
cancellation	O
of	O
hundreds	O
of	O
thousands	O
of	O
voter	O
registrations	O
.	O

Where	O
is	O
her	O
evidence	O
?	O

She	O
has	O
none	O
.	O

Stacey	O
Abrams	O
is	B-PROP
a	I-PROP
sore	I-PROP
loser	I-PROP
just	I-PROP
like	I-PROP
Hillary	I-PROP
Clinton	I-PROP
and	O
this	O
little	O
temper	B-PROP
tantrum	I-PROP
she	O
put	O
on	O
display	O
will	O
probably	O
sink	O
any	O
chances	O
she	O
may	O
have	O
had	O
in	O
the	O
future	O
to	O
run	O
again	O
.	O

Good	B-PROP
!	O

Thank	O
God	O
,	O
Georgia	O
did	O
n't	O
elect	O
this	O
peach	O
.	O

Obama	O
Judge	O
Rules	O
To	O
Upend	O
Georgia	O
Election	O

Who	B-PROP
did	I-PROP
n’t	I-PROP
see	I-PROP
this	I-PROP
coming	I-PROP
?	I-PROP

The	O
fix	O
is	O
in	O
.	O

They	B-PROP
stole	I-PROP
Arizona	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

One	O
down	O
three	O
to	O
go	O
.	O

A	O
federal	O
judge	O
on	O
Monday	O
ordered	O
Georgia	O
take	O
steps	O
to	O
protect	O
provisional	O
ballots	O
and	O
to	O
wait	O
until	O
Friday	O
to	O
certify	O
the	O
results	O
of	O
the	O
midterm	O
elections	O
that	O
include	O
an	O
unsettled	O
race	O
for	O
governor	O
.	O

Lauren	O
Groh	O
-	O
Wargo	O
,	O
Abrams	O
campaign	O
manager	O
,	O
announced	O
Judge	O
Amy	O
Totenberg	O
’s	O
decision	O
late	O
Monday	O
.	O

WSBTV.com	O
reported	O
that	O
the	O
judge	O
’s	O
56-page	O
ruling	O
could	O
affect	O
thousands	O
of	O
provisional	O
ballots	O
.	O

Groh	O
-	O
Wargo	O
called	O
the	O
ruling	O
“	O
good	O
news	O
.	O
”	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O

Should	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
have	O
gotten	O
his	O
press	O
pass	O
back	O
?	O

Should	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
have	O
gotten	O
his	O
press	O
pass	O
back	O
?	O

Should	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
have	O
gotten	O
his	O
press	O
pass	O
back	O
?	O

*	O
Yes	O
,	O
he	O
should	O
have	O
gotten	O
it	O
back	O
.	O

No	O
,	O
you	O
ca	O
n't	O
act	O
like	O
a	O
child	O
and	O
keep	O
your	O
pass	O
.	O

Maybe	O
?	O

I	O
'm	O
not	O
sure	O
if	O
he	O
should	O
have	O
.	O

Email	O
*	O

Email	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Freedom	O
Outpost	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

Brian	O
Kemp	O
,	O
her	O
Republican	O
challenger	O
,	O
issued	O
a	O
statement	O
a	O
day	O
earlier	O
calling	O
for	O
Abrams	O
to	O
concede	O
.	O

Kemp	O
has	O
declared	O
victory	O
and	O
said	O
it	O
is	O
“	O
mathematically	B-PROP
impossible	I-PROP
”	O
for	O
her	O
campaign	O
to	O
force	O
a	O
runoff	O
.	O

Abrams	O
’	O
campaign	O
did	O
not	O
immediately	O
respond	O
to	O
a	O
phone	O
call	O
from	O
Fox	O
News	O
late	O
Monday	O
night	O
.	O

Abrams	O
,	O
44	O
,	O
a	B-PROP
Democrat	I-PROP
,	O
has	O
maintained	O
that	O
she	O
will	O
not	O
concede	O
until	O
every	O
vote	O
has	O
been	O
counted	O
,	O
and	O
pointed	O
to	O
the	O
5,000	O
votes	O
tallied	O
over	O
the	O
weekend	O
that	O
favored	O
her	O
.	O

Totenberg	O
,	O
who	O
was	O
appointed	O
by	O
President	O
Obama	O
,	O
ruled	O
in	O
connection	O
to	O
Common	O
Cause	O
’s	O
lawsuit	O
filed	O
on	O
Nov.	O
5	O
.	O

Totenberg	O
’s	O
order	O
does	O
n’t	O
change	O
the	O
Tuesday	O
deadline	O
for	O
counties	O
to	O
certify	O
their	O
results	O
.	O

Common	O
Cause	O
,	O
a	O
nonpartisan	O
group	O
,	O
claimed	O
in	O
the	O
suit	O
that	O
Kemp	O
,	O
while	O
secretary	O
of	O
state	O
,	O
failed	O
to	O
maintain	O
“	O
the	O
security	O
of	O
voter	O
information	O
despite	O
known	O
vulnerabilities	O
”	O
leading	O
up	O
to	O
the	O
midterm	O
.	O

The	O
suit	O
blasted	B-PROP
the	O
state	O
’s	O
“	O
provisional	O
ballot	O
scheme	O
,	O
”	O
that	O
could	O
disenfranchise	O
a	O
registered	O
voter	O
at	O
the	O
ballot	O
box	O
.	O

The	O
suit	O
pointed	O
out	O
cases	O
where	O
voters	O
were	O
turned	O
around	O
after	O
computer	O
glitches	O
and	O
cases	O
where	O
voters	O
were	O
not	O
offered	O
provisional	O
ballots	O
.	O

One	O
man	O
voted	O
for	O
decades	O
and	O
was	O
“	O
disturbed	O
”	O
to	O
learn	O
his	O
registration	O
history	O
was	O
erased	O
.	O

The	O
court	O
ruled	O
that	O
the	O
secretary	O
of	O
state	O
’s	O
office	O
must	O
establish	O
a	O
hotline	O
and	O
publicize	O
it	O
on	O
its	O
website	O
for	O
voters	O
to	O
see	O
if	O
their	O
provisional	O
ballots	O
were	O
counted	O
.	O

Totenberg	O
also	O
ruled	O
that	O
Georgia	O
must	O
not	O
certify	O
the	O
election	O
results	O
before	O
Friday	O
at	O
5	O
p.m.	O
,	O
which	O
falls	O
before	O
the	O
Nov.	O
20	O
deadline	O
set	O
by	O
state	O
law	O
.	O

“	O
I	B-PROP
am	I-PROP
fighting	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
make	I-PROP
sure	I-PROP
our	I-PROP
democracy	I-PROP
works	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
represents	I-PROP
everyone	I-PROP
who	I-PROP
has	I-PROP
ever	I-PROP
put	I-PROP
their	I-PROP
faith	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

I	O
am	O
fighting	O
for	O
every	O
Georgian	O
who	O
cast	O
a	O
ballot	O
with	O
the	O
promise	O
that	O
their	O
vote	O
would	O
count	O
,	O
”	O
Abrams	O
said	O
in	O
a	O
statement	O
explaining	O
her	O
refusal	O
to	O
end	O
her	O
bid	O
to	O
become	O
the	O
first	O
black	O
woman	O
elected	O
governor	O
in	O
American	O
history	O
.	O

A	O
total	O
of	O
21,190	O
provisional	O
ballots	O
were	O
cast	O
in	O
the	O
state	O
during	O
the	O
midterm	O
,	O
12,151	O
were	O
cast	O
in	O
2014	O
.	O

Four	O
Democratic	B-PROP
-	O
leaning	O
counties	O
with	O
the	O
largest	O
number	O
of	O
provisional	O
ballots	O
—	O
Cobb	O
,	O
DeKalb	O
,	O
Fulton	O
,	O
and	O
Gwinnett	O
–	O
“	O
had	O
not	O
yet	O
reported	O
their	O
numbers	O
to	O
the	O
secretary	O
as	O
of	O
November	O
11	O
,	O
”	O
the	O
suit	O
said	O
.	O

The	O
lawsuit	O
also	O
asked	O
that	O
provisional	O
ballots	O
cast	O
by	O
a	O
voter	O
registered	O
in	O
another	O
county	O
be	O
counted	O
as	O
if	O
the	O
voter	O
had	O
shown	O
up	O
at	O
the	O
wrong	O
precinct	O
.	O

The	O
lawsuit	O
says	O
that	O
of	O
the	O
1,556	O
provisional	O
ballots	O
Fulton	O
County	O
reported	O
having	O
rejected	O
by	O
Nov.	O
9	O
,	O
nearly	O
1,000	O
were	O
disqualified	O
because	O
they	O
were	O
cast	O
by	O
voters	O
whose	O
registration	O
records	O
showed	O
them	O
registered	O
in	O
another	O
county	O
.	O

Edgardo	O
Cortes	O
,	O
who	O
currently	O
works	O
as	O
an	O
election	O
security	O
adviser	O
at	O
New	O
York	O
University	O
,	O
said	O
these	O
uncounted	O
provisional	O
ballots	O
could	O
sway	O
the	O
election	O
and	O
,	O
despite	O
Kemp	O
’s	O
claims	O
,	O
his	O
unofficial	O
vote	O
total	O
is	O
so	O
close	O
to	O
50	O
percent	O
,	O
a	O
runoff	O
is	O
possible	O
.	O

Kemp	O
was	O
up	O
50.2	O
percent	O
to	O
Abrams	O
’	O
48.7	O
percent	O
early	O
Tuesday	O
.	O

More	O
than	O
3.9	O
million	O
votes	O
were	O
cast	O
in	O
the	O
election	O
,	O
and	O
Abrams	O
would	O
need	O
to	O
acquire	O
more	O
than	O
20,000	O
additional	O
votes	O
to	O
force	O
a	O
runoff	O
.	O

Abrams	O
’	O
campaign	O
filed	O
a	O
lawsuit	O
Sunday	O
asking	O
a	O
federal	O
court	O
to	O
push	O
the	O
deadline	O
for	O
counties	O
to	O
certify	O
their	O
results	O
to	O
Wednesday	O
,	O
while	O
also	O
requiring	O
that	O
elections	O
authorities	O
count	O
certain	O
provisional	O
and	O
absentee	O
ballots	O
that	O
have	O
been	O
or	O
would	O
be	O
rejected	O
for	O
“	O
arbitrary	O
reasons	O
.	O
”	O

“	O
This	O
ruling	O
is	O
a	O
victory	O
for	O
the	O
voters	O
of	O
Georgia	O
because	O
we	O
are	O
all	O
stronger	O
when	O
every	O
eligible	O
voter	O
is	O
allowed	O
to	O
participate	O
in	O
our	O
elections	O
,	O
”	O
Sara	O
Henderson	O
,	O
executive	O
director	O
for	O
Common	O
Cause	O
Georgia	O
,	O
which	O
filed	O
the	O
lawsuit	O
,	O
told	O
AJC.com	O
.	O

Hey	O
,	O
Self	B-PROP
Proclaimed	I-PROP
"	I-PROP
Fact	I-PROP
Checkers	I-PROP
"	O
and	O
Mainstream	O
Media	O
,	O
Let	O
's	O
Not	O
Let	O
That	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
Propaganda	O
You	O
're	O
Putting	O
Out	O
Go	O
So	O
Fast	O
!	O

Notice	O
how	O
quickly	O
the	B-PROP
drive	I-PROP
-	I-PROP
by	I-PROP
media	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
self	I-PROP
-	I-PROP
proclaimed	I-PROP
"	I-PROP
fact	I-PROP
checkers	I-PROP
"	I-PROP
gunned	B-PROP
down	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
Trump	I-PROP
administration	I-PROP
and	O
Infowars	O
with	O
their	O
lying	B-PROP
propaganda	I-PROP
over	O
the	O
video	O
that	O
was	O
enhanced	O
,	O
not	O
doctored	O
,	O
to	O
demonstrate	O
that	O
all	O
of	O
them	O
and	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
are	O
lying	B-PROP
through	I-PROP
their	I-PROP
Communist	I-PROP
teeth	I-PROP
?	O

Yep	O
,	O
I	O
noticed	O
too	O
,	O
and	O
now	O
they	O
're	O
trying	O
to	O
move	O
on	O
,	O
but	O
I	O
'm	O
gon	O
na	O
get	O
in	O
one	O
last	O
bit	O
before	O
we	O
do	O
.	O

Of	B-PROP
course	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
Infowars	I-PROP
'	I-PROP
Paul	I-PROP
Joseph	I-PROP
Watson	I-PROP
simply	I-PROP
enhanced	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
video	I-PROP
from	O
C	O
-	O
SPAN	O
,	O
which	O
was	O
a	O
gif	O
image	O
(	O
motion	O
picture	O
)	O
,	O
in	B-PROP
order	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
show	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
point	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
contact	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
lying	I-PROP
media	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
"	I-PROP
fact	I-PROP
checkers	I-PROP
"	I-PROP
said	I-PROP
did	I-PROP
n't	I-PROP
occur	I-PROP
.	O

Watson	O
then	O
went	O
on	O
to	O
be	O
happy	O
that	O
President	O
Trump	O
backed	O
him	O
up	O
on	O
his	O
comments	O
about	O
the	O
video	O
.	O

Take	O
a	O
look	O
,	O
and	O
as	O
always	O
,	O
PJW	O
is	O
hilarious	B-PROP
in	O
his	O
presentation	O
.	O

If	B-PROP
they	I-PROP
're	I-PROP
prepared	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
lie	I-PROP
this	I-PROP
shamelessly	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
what	I-PROP
else	I-PROP
are	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
lying	I-PROP
about	I-PROP
?	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O
Should	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
have	O
gotten	O
his	O
press	O
pass	O
back	O
?	O

Should	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
have	O
gotten	O
his	O
press	O
pass	O
back	O
?	O

Should	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
have	O
gotten	O
his	O
press	O
pass	O
back	O
?	O

*	O
Yes	O
,	O
he	O
should	O
have	O
gotten	O
it	O
back	O
.	O

No	O
,	O
you	O
ca	O
n't	O
act	O
like	O
a	O
child	O
and	O
keep	O
your	O
pass	O
.	O

Maybe	O
?	O

I	O
'm	O
not	O
sure	O
if	O
he	O
should	O
have	O
.	O

Email	O
*	O

Name	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Freedom	O
Outpost	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

SHARE	O
:	O
https://t.co/lP4GlbjJQM	O
pic.twitter.com/iZUsXlZTLt	O
—	O
Paul	O
Joseph	O
Watson	O
(	O
@PrisonPlanet	O
)	O
November	O
12	O
,	O
2018	O

Steven	O
Colbert	O
,	O
you	O
're	O
lying	O
.	O

Jimmy	O
Kimmel	O
,	O
you	O
're	O
lying	O
.	O

CNN	O
,	O
you	O
're	O
lying	O
.	O

CNN	O
's	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
told	O
CNN	O
's	O
Anderson	O
Cooper	O
that	O
he	O
*	O
never	O
*	O
touched	O
the	O
female	O
White	O
House	O
aide	O
that	O
tried	O
to	O
take	O
the	O
mic	O
away	O
from	O
him	O
.	O

CNN	O
showed	O
the	O
clip	O
but	O
edited	O
out	O
the	O
part	O
where	O
he	O
clearly	O
touched	O
her	O
.	O

Cooper	O
offered	O
no	O
pushback	O
on	O
Acosta	O
's	O
blatant	B-PROP
lie	I-PROP
.	O

pic.twitter.com/65rP9xWWyI	O
—	O
Ryan	O
Saavedra	O
(	O
@RealSaavedra	O
)	O
November	O
8	O
,	O
2018	O

Jim	O
Acosta	O
,	O
you	O
're	O
lying	O
.	O

New	O
York	O
Times	O
,	O
you	O
're	O
lying	O
.	O

Every	O
media	O
outlet	O
from	O
the	O
Associated	O
Press	O
to	O
NBC	O
,	O
you	B-PROP
're	I-PROP
lying	I-PROP
when	I-PROP
you	I-PROP
say	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
video	I-PROP
was	I-PROP
doctored	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
Acosta	I-PROP
did	I-PROP
n't	I-PROP
touch	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
woman	I-PROP
.	O

At	O
least	O
C	O
-	O
SPAN	O
is	O
neutral	O
in	O
the	O
matter	O
and	O
simply	O
let	O
the	O
video	O
reprove	O
every	O
single	O
one	O
of	O
them	O
.	O

But	O
it	O
's	O
more	O
than	O
that	O
,	O
self	B-PROP
-	I-PROP
proclaimed	I-PROP
"	I-PROP
fact	I-PROP
checkers	I-PROP
"	O
like	O
Snopes	O
simply	O
posted	O
an	O
Associated	O
Press	O
article	O
,	O
which	O
clearly	O
biased	O
towards	O
indicating	O
the	O
video	O
was	O
"	O
doctored	O
"	O
by	O
saying	O
it	O
was	O
sped	O
up	O
,	O
but	O
that	O
's	O
not	O
doctoring	O
.	O

Doctoring	B-PROP
is	O
when	O
you	O
manipulate	O
the	O
content	O
to	O
misconstrue	O
the	O
reality	O
of	O
what	O
took	O
place	O
.	O

If	O
you	O
want	O
to	O
see	O
doctoring	O
,	O
go	O
to	O
0:58	O
of	O
the	O
video	O
above	O
,	O
and	O
do	O
n't	O
be	O
drinking	O
anything	O
when	O
you	O
do	O
because	O
it	O
's	O
hilarious	B-PROP
.	O

But	O
it	O
is	O
n't	O
just	O
Snopes	O
or	O
Politifact	O
and	O
outlets	O
like	O
that	O
.	O

Take	O
,	O
for	O
instance	O
,	O
websites	O
like	O
MediaBiasFactCheck.com	O
,	O
whom	O
I	O
had	O
to	O
have	O
my	O
attorneys	O
send	O
a	O
letter	O
for	O
their	O
libel	O
and	O
they	O
did	O
n't	O
just	O
correct	O
it	O
,	O
they	O
removed	O
it	O
entirely	O
because	O
they	O
knew	O
I	O
was	O
two	O
days	O
away	O
from	O
filing	O
a	O
lawsuit	O
against	O
them	O
.	O

MBFC	O
actually	O
called	O
CNN	O
"	O
left	B-PROP
biased	I-PROP
,	O
"	O
which	O
is	O
correct	O
but	O
followed	O
up	O
with	O
:	O

Overall	O
,	O
we	O
rate	O
CNN	O
left	O
biased	O
based	O
on	O
story	O
selection	O
that	O
often	O
favors	O
the	O
left	O
.	O

We	O
rate	O
them	O
Mixed	O
for	O
factual	O
reporting	O
due	O
to	O
misinformation	O
and	O
failed	B-PROP
fact	I-PROP
checks	I-PROP
from	O
guests	O
and	O
pundits	O
.	O

However	O
,	O
CNN	O
’s	O
straight	O
news	O
reporting	O
would	O
earn	O
a	O
High	O
rating	O
for	O
factual	O
reporting	O
.	O

(	O
5/16/2016	O
)	O
Updated	O
(	O
D.	O
Van	O
Zandt	O
6/15/2018	O
)	O

Straight	B-PROP
reporting	I-PROP
?	O

You	B-PROP
must	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
kidding	I-PROP
me	I-PROP
?	I-PROP

Did	B-PROP
David	I-PROP
Van	I-PROP
Zandt	I-PROP
not	I-PROP
watch	I-PROP
Jim	I-PROP
Acosta	I-PROP
lie	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
Anderson	I-PROP
Cooper	I-PROP
about	I-PROP
this	I-PROP
episode	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
Cooper	I-PROP
just	I-PROP
sat	I-PROP
there	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
let	I-PROP
him	I-PROP
lie	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
American	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
editing	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
video	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
not	I-PROP
even	I-PROP
show	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
point	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
contact	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
question	I-PROP
?	I-PROP

Why	B-PROP
yes	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
yes	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
he	I-PROP
did	I-PROP
!	O

Not	B-PROP
only	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
but	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
appears	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
MBFC	I-PROP
does	I-PROP
n't	I-PROP
know	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
documented	I-PROP
history	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
CNN	I-PROP
's	I-PROP
complete	I-PROP
fabrication	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
"	I-PROP
news	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
"	I-PROP
telling	I-PROP
stories	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
never	I-PROP
happened	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

MBFC	O
is	O
n't	O
qualified	O
to	O
comment	O
on	O
the	O
subject	O
.	O

It	O
is	O
n't	O
just	O
MBFC	O
though	O
.	O

Newcomer	O
NewsGuard	O
also	O
covers	O
for	O
CNN	O
.	O

This	O
is	O
supposed	O
to	O
be	O
an	O
outlet	O
,	O
at	O
least	O
what	O
I	O
was	O
told	O
in	O
email	O
and	O
phone	O
communication	O
,	O
that	O
is	O
simply	O
to	O
determine	O
transparency	O
of	O
websites	O
.	O

Instead	B-PROP
,	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
not	I-PROP
only	I-PROP
do	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
but	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
go	I-PROP
on	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
do	I-PROP
far	I-PROP
more	I-PROP
than	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

In	O
rating	O
CNN	O
,	O
NewsGuard	O
posts	O
this	O
nonsense	B-PROP
.	O

I	O
'm	O
sure	O
NewsGuard	O
,	O
Yemile	O
Bucay	O
,	O
Anna	O
-	O
Sophie	O
Harling	O
and	O
Amy	O
Westfeldt	O
need	O
to	O
update	O
this	O
in	O
the	O
light	O
of	O
the	O
obvious	O
lies	O
and	O
editing	O
of	O
the	O
Acosta	O
video	O
and	O
decades	O
of	O
documented	O
,	O
outright	B-PROP
lies	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
propaganda	I-PROP
by	O
the	B-PROP
Clown	I-PROP
News	I-PROP
Network	I-PROP
,	O
but	B-PROP
you	I-PROP
ca	I-PROP
n't	I-PROP
expect	I-PROP
real	I-PROP
transparency	I-PROP
from	I-PROP
an	I-PROP
outlet	I-PROP
like	I-PROP
Newsguard	I-PROP
whose	I-PROP
writers	I-PROP
are	I-PROP
n't	I-PROP
transparent	I-PROP
about	I-PROP
their	I-PROP
own	I-PROP
political	I-PROP
bias	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
can	I-PROP
you	I-PROP
?	I-PROP

Nope	O
,	O
you	O
ca	O
n't	O
,	O
and	O
you	O
ca	O
n't	O
expect	O
it	O
when	O
some	O
of	O
those	O
writers	O
write	O
for	O
other	O
publications	O
that	O
do	O
n't	O
measure	O
up	O
to	O
NewsGuard	O
's	O
standards	O
either	O
.	O

The	B-PROP
reason	I-PROP
this	I-PROP
little	I-PROP
incident	I-PROP
should	I-PROP
n't	I-PROP
be	I-PROP
let	I-PROP
go	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
so	I-PROP
soon	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
one	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
clearest	I-PROP
demonstrations	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
media	I-PROP
's	I-PROP
bias	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
which	I-PROP
we	I-PROP
all	I-PROP
have	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
lies	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
propaganda	I-PROP
.	O

It	O
should	O
be	O
used	O
over	O
and	O
over	O
in	O
article	O
after	O
article	O
to	O
remind	O
people	O
about	O
the	B-PROP
total	I-PROP
dishonesty	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
complete	I-PROP
disregard	I-PROP
for	O
reporting	O
the	O
facts	O
by	O
outlets	O
such	O
as	O
CNN	O
and	O
to	O
not	B-PROP
blindly	I-PROP
trust	I-PROP
self	B-PROP
-	I-PROP
proclaimed	I-PROP
fact	I-PROP
-	I-PROP
checkers	I-PROP
who	I-PROP
will	I-PROP
not	I-PROP
tell	I-PROP
you	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
truth	I-PROP
either	I-PROP
.	O

CNN	O
has	B-PROP
lost	I-PROP
its	I-PROP
mind	I-PROP
to	O
the	O
point	O
that	O
they	O
are	O
suing	O
over	O
Acosta	O
losing	O
his	O
press	O
pass	O
.	O

He	O
was	O
their	O
inside	O
boy	O
,	O
after	O
all	O
.	O

But	O
the	O
real	O
irony	O
here	O
is	O
that	O
the	O
media	O
labeled	O
Paul	O
Joseph	O
Watson	O
and	O
Infowars	O
as	O
"	O
conspiracy	B-PROP
theorists	I-PROP
"	O
and	O
yet	O
,	O
PJW	O
has	O
exposed	O
their	O
blatant	B-PROP
conspiracy	I-PROP
to	B-PROP
smear	I-PROP
President	I-PROP
Trump	O
,	O
Sarah	O
Sanders	O
and	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
aide	O
.	O

And	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
believes	O
he	O
and	O
CNN	O
deal	O
with	O
facts	O
and	O
Infowars	O
does	O
n't	O
.	O

Yeah	B-PROP
,	I-PROP
right	I-PROP
!	O

I	O
'm	O
sorry	O
Jim	O
,	O
I	O
ca	O
n't	O
hear	O
you	O
over	O
the	O
booming	O
voice	O
of	O
your	O
hypocrisy	B-PROP
!	O

Article	O
posted	O
with	O
permission	O
from	O
The	O
Washington	O
Standard	O

Judge	O
Orders	O
White	O
House	O
To	O
Restore	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
'	O
Press	O
Pass	O
-	O
Trump	O
Responds	O

A	O
Trump	O
appointed	O
federal	O
judge	O
has	O
order	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
to	O
restore	O
CNN	O
reporter	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
's	O
press	O
pass	O
after	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
revoked	O
it	O
for	O
his	O
badgering	O
of	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
press	O
secretary	O
,	O
his	O
handling	O
of	O
a	O
White	O
House	O
aide	O
and	O
his	O
continual	O
questioning	O
when	O
he	O
was	O
allowed	O
to	O
ask	O
a	O
question	O
and	O
follow	O
up	O
.	O

The	O
ruling	O
has	O
no	O
basis	O
in	O
the	O
Constitution	O
,	O
mind	O
you	O
.	O

USA	O
Today	O
reported	O
on	O
the	O
ruling	O
:	O

WASHINGTON	O
–	O
A	O
federal	O
judge	O
on	O
Friday	O
ordered	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
to	O
restore	O
CNN	O
reporter	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
’s	O
press	O
badge	O
,	O
which	O
had	O
been	O
revoked	O
earlier	O
this	O
month	O
after	O
a	O
contentious	O
exchange	O
at	O
a	O
news	O
conference	O
with	O
President	O
Donald	O
Trump	O
.	O

U.S.	O
District	O
Court	O
Judge	O
Timothy	O
Kelly	O
,	O
a	O
Trump	O
appointee	O
,	O
said	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
had	O
violated	O
Acosta	O
’s	O
Fifth	O
Amendment	O
right	O
to	O
due	O
process	O
by	O
suspending	O
his	O
press	O
badge	O
without	O
explanation	O
or	O
a	O
chance	O
for	O
CNN	O
to	O
appeal	O
the	O
decision	O
.	O

Kelly	O
said	O
White	O
House	O
officials	O
could	O
n’t	O
say	O
who	O
made	O
the	O
decision	O
or	O
how	O
.	O

The	O
judge	O
ordered	O
the	O
government	O
to	O
restore	O
the	O
credential	O
while	O
the	O
rest	O
of	O
the	O
case	O
–	O
which	O
drew	O
a	B-PROP
slew	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
support	I-PROP
from	O
other	O
media	O
outlets	O
,	O
including	O
USA	O
TODAY	O
–	O
is	O
argued	O
.	O

“	O
This	O
court	O
can	O
not	O
restore	O
Mr.	O
Acosta	O
’s	O
access	O
to	O
press	O
briefings	O
that	O
have	O
already	O
been	O
held	O
,	O
”	O
Kelly	O
said	O
.	O

But	O
Kelly	O
said	O
he	O
has	O
n’t	O
considered	O
at	O
all	O
yet	O
whether	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
violated	O
Acosta	O
’s	O
First	O
Amendment	O
rights	O
.	O

More	O
arguments	O
are	O
expected	O
Tuesday	O
.	O

“	O
I	O
trust	O
this	O
litigation	O
will	O
continue	O
at	O
a	O
rapid	O
pace	O
.	O
”	O
Kelly	O
said	O
.	O

What	O
?	O

Due	O
process	O
?	O

Wait	O
,	O
Acosta	O
was	O
not	O
charged	O
with	O
a	O
crime	O
.	O

Neither	O
his	O
property	O
,	O
liberty	O
nor	O
his	O
life	O
was	O
taken	O
.	O

There	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
no	I-PROP
due	I-PROP
process	I-PROP
here	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O

Should	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
have	O
gotten	O
his	O
press	O
pass	O
back	O
?	O

Should	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
have	O
gotten	O
his	O
press	O
pass	O
back	O
?	O

Should	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
have	O
gotten	O
his	O
press	O
pass	O
back	O
?	O

*	O
Yes	O
,	O
he	O
should	O
have	O
gotten	O
it	O
back	O
.	O

No	O
,	O
you	O
ca	O
n't	O
act	O
like	O
a	O
child	O
and	O
keep	O
your	O
pass	O
.	O

Maybe	O
?	O

I	O
'm	O
not	O
sure	O
if	O
he	O
should	O
have	O
.	O

Email	O
*	O

Phone	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Freedom	O
Outpost	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

The	B-PROP
Fifth	I-PROP
Amendment	I-PROP
has	I-PROP
no	I-PROP
business	I-PROP
being	I-PROP
brought	I-PROP
up	I-PROP
here	I-PROP
.	I-PROP

This	O
is	O
an	O
issue	O
of	O
privilege	O
,	O
not	O
rights	O
.	O

I	B-PROP
have	I-PROP
made	I-PROP
this	I-PROP
point	I-PROP
before	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
this	I-PROP
judge	I-PROP
apparently	I-PROP
does	I-PROP
n't	I-PROP
get	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
.	O

I	O
want	O
my	O
White	O
House	O
press	O
pass	O
!	O

So	O
does	O
Infowars	O
.	O

Will	O
Judge	O
Kelly	O
demand	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
provide	O
us	O
with	O
one	O
as	O
a	O
"	O
right	O
"	O
?	O

Nope	O
,	O
not	O
gon	O
na	O
happen	O
.	O

Because	O
it	O
's	O
not	O
a	O
right	O
.	O

Yet	O
,	O
this	O
judge	O
orders	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
to	O
restore	O
the	O
credentials	O
?	O

Give	B-PROP
me	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
break	I-PROP
!	O

Acosta	O
's	O
First	O
Amendment	O
rights	O
were	O
n't	O
violated	O
either	O
.	O

Furthermore	O
,	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
did	O
say	O
they	O
were	O
willing	O
to	O
have	O
another	O
reporter	O
in	O
to	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
press	O
from	O
CNN	O
,	O
but	O
that	O
just	O
was	O
n't	O
good	O
enough	O
.	O

CNN	O
tweeted	O
:	O
"	O
Statement	O
from	O
CNN	O
and	O
@	O
Acosta	O
on	O
today	O
’s	O
ruling	O
:	O
“	O
We	O
are	O
gratified	O
with	O
this	O
result	O
and	O
we	O
look	O
forward	O
to	O
a	O
full	O
resolution	O
in	O
the	O
coming	O
days	O
.	O

Our	O
sincere	O
thanks	O
to	O
all	O
who	O
have	O
supported	O
not	O
just	O
CNN	O
,	O
but	O
a	O
free	O
,	O
strong	O
and	O
independent	O
American	O
press	O
.	O
”	O

Statement	O
from	O
CNN	O
and	O
@Acosta	O
on	O
today	O
’s	O
ruling	O
:	O
“	O
We	O
are	O
gratified	O
with	O
this	O
result	O
and	O
we	O
look	O
forward	O
to	O
a	O
full	O
resolution	O
in	O
the	O
coming	O
days	O
.	O

Our	O
sincere	O
thanks	O
to	O
all	O
who	O
have	O
supported	O
not	O
just	O
CNN	O
,	O
but	O
a	O
free	O
,	O
strong	O
and	O
independent	O
American	O
press	O
.	O
”	O
—	O
CNN	O
Communications	O
(	O
@CNNPR	O
)	O
November	O
16	O
,	O
2018	O

More	O
like	O
a	B-PROP
strong	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
lying	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
propagandizing	I-PROP
press	I-PROP
,	O
right	O
CNN	O
?	O

President	O
Trump	O
responded	O
to	O
the	O
order	O
.	O

He	O
told	O
Fox	O
News	O
'	O
Chris	O
Wallace	O
,	O
"	O
Yeah	O
,	O
its	O
fine	O
,	O
I	O
mean	O
it	O
’s	O
not	O
a	O
big	O
deal	O
.	O

What	O
they	O
said	O
,	O
though	O
,	O
is	O
that	O
we	O
have	O
to	O
create	O
rules	O
and	O
regulations	O
for	O
conduct	O
etc	O
.	O

etc	O
.	O

We	O
’re	O
doing	O
that	O
,	O
were	O
going	O
to	O
write	O
them	O
up	O
right	O
now	O
.	O

It	O
’s	O
not	O
a	O
big	O
deal	O
and	O
if	O
he	O
misbehaves	O
,	O
we	O
’ll	O
throw	O
him	O
out	O
or	O
we	O
’ll	O
stop	O
the	O
news	O
conference	O
.	O
"	O

In	O
speaking	O
about	O
the	O
rules	O
and	O
regulations	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
is	O
writing	O
up	O
,	O
Trump	O
added	O
,	O
"	O
We	O
’re	O
writing	O
them	O
now	O
.	O

We	O
’ll	O
have	O
rules	O
of	O
decorum	O
,	O
you	O
know	O
you	O
ca	O
n’t	O
keep	O
asking	O
questions	O
.	O

We	O
had	O
a	O
lot	O
of	O
reporters	O
in	O
that	O
room	O
,	O
many	O
many	O
reporters	O
in	O
that	O
room	O
and	O
they	O
were	O
unable	O
to	O
ask	O
questions	O
because	O
this	O
guy	O
gets	O
up	O
and	O
starts	O
,	O
you	O
know	O
,	O
doing	O
what	O
he	O
’s	O
supposed	O
to	O
be	O
doing	O
for	O
him	O
and	O
for	O
CNN	O
and	O
you	O
know	O
just	O
shouting	O
out	O
questions	O
and	O
making	O
statements	O
,	O
too	O
.	O
"	O

You	O
know	O
that	O
is	O
n't	O
going	O
to	O
stop	O
someone	O
like	O
Acosta	O
,	O
who	B-PROP
claimed	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
deal	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
facts	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
truth	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
but	I-PROP
clearly	I-PROP
demonstrated	I-PROP
he	I-PROP
was	I-PROP
all	I-PROP
about	I-PROP
lies	I-PROP
when	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
came	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
putting	I-PROP
his	I-PROP
hands	I-PROP
on	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
White	I-PROP
House	I-PROP
aide	I-PROP
.	O

The	O
order	O
by	O
Judge	O
Kelly	O
is	O
a	O
temporary	O
one	O
that	O
lasts	O
for	O
14	O
days	O
.	O

“	O
I	O
will	O
say	O
this	O
,	O
look	O
,	O
nobody	B-PROP
believes	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
First	I-PROP
Amendment	I-PROP
more	I-PROP
than	I-PROP
I	I-PROP
do	I-PROP
and	O
if	O
I	O
think	O
somebody	O
is	O
acting	O
out	O
of	O
sorts	O
I	O
will	O
leave	O
,	O
"	O
Trump	O
continued	O
.	O

"	O
I	O
will	O
say	O
thank	O
you	O
very	O
much	O
everybody	O
,	O
I	O
appreciate	O
you	O
coming	O
and	O
I	O
’ll	O
leave	O
.	O

And	O
those	O
reporters	O
will	O
not	O
be	O
too	O
friendly	O
to	O
whoever	B-PROP
it	I-PROP
is	I-PROP
that	I-PROP
’s	I-PROP
acting	I-PROP
up	I-PROP
.	O
”	O

White	O
House	O
Press	O
Secretary	O
Sarah	O
Sanders	O
issued	O
a	O
statement	O
following	O
the	O
judge	O
's	O
ruling	O
on	O
Thursday	O
.	O

“	O
Today	O
,	O
the	O
court	O
made	O
clear	O
that	O
there	O
is	O
no	O
absolute	O
First	O
Amendment	O
right	O
to	O
access	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
.	O

In	O
response	O
to	O
the	O
court	O
,	O
we	O
will	O
temporarily	O
reinstate	O
the	O
reporter	O
’s	O
hard	O
pass	O
.	O

We	O
will	O
also	O
further	O
develop	O
rules	O
and	O
processes	O
to	O
ensure	O
fair	O
and	O
orderly	O
press	O
conferences	O
in	O
the	O
future	O
.	O

There	O
must	O
be	O
decorum	O
at	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
.	O
”	O

Well	O
,	O
I	O
ca	O
n't	O
wait	O
to	O
see	O
the	O
next	O
press	O
conference	O
.	O

Perhaps	O
there	O
is	O
an	O
easier	O
way	O
around	O
all	O
of	O
this	O
.	O

Perhaps	O
from	O
now	O
on	O
,	O
President	O
Trump	O
should	O
ignore	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
and	O
take	O
anyone	O
and	O
everyone	O
else	O
's	O
questions	O
in	O
the	O
room	O
but	O
his	O
questions	O
.	O

See	O
how	O
he	O
likes	O
them	O
apples	O
.	O

Not	O
Surprising	O
:	O
Now	O
Fox	O
News	O
Is	O
Supporting	O
CNN	O
&	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O

Fox	O
News	O
is	O
largely	O
controlled	O
opposition	O
despite	O
what	O
many	O
may	O
think	O
.	O

They	O
have	O
a	O
couple	O
of	O
people	O
that	O
actually	O
are	O
conservative	O
.	O

Other	O
than	O
that	O
,	O
they	O
have	O
liberals	O
and	O
neo	O
-	O
cons	O
running	B-PROP
rampant	I-PROP
.	O

Many	O
were	O
surprised	O
to	O
discover	O
that	O
Fox	O
News	O
not	O
only	O
is	O
supporting	O
lying	B-PROP
CNN	I-PROP
and	O
lying	B-PROP
Jim	I-PROP
Acosta	I-PROP
,	O
but	O
they	O
are	O
even	O
going	O
so	O
far	O
as	O
to	O
file	O
an	O
amicus	O
brief	O
with	O
the	O
US	O
district	O
court	O
over	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
's	O
revoking	O
of	O
Acosta	O
's	O
press	O
pass	O
.	O

One	O
would	O
think	O
these	O
people	O
would	O
understand	O
that	O
this	O
is	O
not	O
a	O
First	O
Amendment	O
issue	O
.	O

If	O
it	O
were	O
,	O
they	O
would	O
n't	O
have	O
to	O
apply	O
for	O
a	O
White	O
House	O
press	O
pass	O
.	O

This	O
is	O
a	O
privilege	O
issue	O
and	O
it	O
seems	O
that	O
Acosta	O
wore	B-PROP
out	O
his	O
welcome	O
with	O
his	O
attacks	O
on	O
Sarah	O
Sanders	O
,	O
being	O
belligerent	B-PROP
during	O
his	O
time	O
asking	O
a	O
question(s	O
)	O
of	O
President	O
Donald	O
Trump	O
,	O
and	O
his	O
pushing	O
aside	O
a	O
White	O
House	O
aide	O
who	O
simply	O
tried	O
to	O
remove	O
the	O
microphone	O
from	O
him	O
.	O

Trump	O
was	O
right	O
,	O
Acosta	O
is	O
a	O
"	O
rude	B-PROP
,	I-PROP
terrible	I-PROP
person	I-PROP
.	O
"	O

take	O
our	O
poll	O
-	O
story	O
continues	O
below	O

Should	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
have	O
gotten	O
his	O
press	O
pass	O
back	O
?	O

Should	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
have	O
gotten	O
his	O
press	O
pass	O
back	O
?	O

Should	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
have	O
gotten	O
his	O
press	O
pass	O
back	O
?	O

*	O
Yes	O
,	O
he	O
should	O
have	O
gotten	O
it	O
back	O
.	O

No	O
,	O
you	O
ca	O
n't	O
act	O
like	O
a	O
child	O
and	O
keep	O
your	O
pass	O
.	O

Maybe	O
?	O

I	O
'm	O
not	O
sure	O
if	O
he	O
should	O
have	O
.	O

Email	O
*	O

Email	O
This	O
field	O
is	O
for	O
validation	O
purposes	O
and	O
should	O
be	O
left	O
unchanged	O
.	O

Completing	O
this	O
poll	O
grants	O
you	O
access	O
to	O
Freedom	O
Outpost	O
updates	O
free	O
of	O
charge	O
.	O

You	O
may	O
opt	O
out	O
at	O
anytime	O
.	O

You	O
also	O
agree	O
to	O
this	O
site	O
's	O
Privacy	O
Policy	O
and	O
Terms	O
of	O
Use	O
.	O

However	O
,	O
the	O
cable	O
news	O
channel	O
is	O
showing	O
more	O
and	O
more	O
that	O
it	O
is	O
not	O
fair	O
and	O
balanced	O
and	O
is	O
far	O
from	O
what	O
conservatives	O
think	O
it	O
is	O
as	O
it	O
blasted	B-PROP
the	O
White	O
House	O
about	O
not	O
giving	O
little	O
Jimmy	O
his	O
press	O
pass	O
back	O
.	O

In	O
a	O
statement	O
by	O
Fox	O
News	O
President	O
Jay	O
Wallace	O
,	O
he	O
wrote	O
:	O

“	O
Fox	O
News	O
supports	O
CNN	O
in	O
its	O
legal	O
effort	O
to	O
regain	O
its	O
White	O
House	O
reporter	O
’s	O
press	O
credential	O
.	O

We	O
intend	O
to	O
file	O
an	O
amicus	O
brief	O
with	O
the	O
U.S.	O
District	O
Court	O
.	O

Secret	O
Service	O
passes	O
for	O
working	O
White	O
House	O
journalists	O
should	O
never	O
be	O
weaponized	O
.	O

While	O
we	O
do	O
n’t	O
condone	O
the	O
growing	O
antagonistic	B-PROP
tone	O
by	O
both	O
the	O
president	O
and	O
the	O
press	O
at	O
recent	O
media	O
avails	O
,	O
we	O
do	O
support	O
a	O
free	O
press	O
,	O
access	O
and	O
open	O
exchanges	O
for	O
the	B-PROP
American	I-PROP
people	I-PROP
.	O
"	O

So	O
,	O
file	O
it	O
!	O

On	O
the	O
basis	O
of	O
what	O
,	O
Mr.	O
Wallace	O
?	O

The	B-PROP
free	I-PROP
press	I-PROP
still	I-PROP
exists	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
you	I-PROP
know	I-PROP
what	I-PROP
?	O

Jim	O
Acosta	O
and	O
CNN	O
continue	B-PROP
to	I-PROP
lie	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
just	I-PROP
like	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
have	I-PROP
for	I-PROP
decades	I-PROP
,	O
and	O
here	O
's	O
the	O
proof	O
.	O

Look	B-PROP
how	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
doctored	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
video	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
not	I-PROP
show	I-PROP
what	I-PROP
clearly	I-PROP
took	I-PROP
place	I-PROP
and	I-PROP
then	I-PROP
lied	I-PROP
about	I-PROP
it	I-PROP
,	O
and	O
I	O
suppose	O
Fox	O
falls	O
right	O
in	O
line	O
with	O
that	O
behavior	O
.	O

So	O
,	O
Fox	O
joins	O
with	O
the	B-PROP
least	I-PROP
trusted	I-PROP
name	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
news	I-PROP
,	O
the	B-PROP
Clown	I-PROP
News	I-PROP
Network	I-PROP
,	O
to	O
go	O
after	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
on	O
something	O
that	O
is	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
's	O
prerogative	O
and	O
claim	O
it	O
's	O
about	O
free	O
press	O
.	O

It	B-PROP
's	I-PROP
not	I-PROP
.	O

Fox	O
reported	O
:	O

The	O
White	O
House	O
Correspondents	O
’	O
Association	O
–	O
of	O
which	O
Fox	O
News	O
is	O
a	O
member	O
–	O
issued	O
a	O
statement	O
in	O
support	O
of	O
CNN	O
’s	O
decision	O
to	O
take	O
legal	O
action	O
.	O

“	O
We	O
continue	O
to	O
urge	O
the	O
administration	O
to	O
reverse	O
course	O
and	O
fully	O
reinstate	O
CNN	O
’s	O
correspondent	O
,	O
”	O
WHCA	O
President	O
Olivier	O
Knox	O
said	O
.	O

“	O
The	O
President	O
of	O
the	O
United	O
States	O
should	O
not	O
be	O
in	O
the	O
business	O
of	O
arbitrarily	B-PROP
picking	O
the	O
men	O
and	O
women	O
who	O
cover	O
him	O
.	O
”	O
However	O
,	O
several	O
prominent	O
media	O
members	O
–	O
such	O
as	O
Pulitzer	O
Prize	O
-	O
winning	O
Watergate	O
journalist	O
Bob	O
Woodward	O
–	O
have	O
criticized	O
CNN	O
over	O
the	O
lawsuit	O
.	O

As	O
they	O
should	O
.	O

It	O
's	O
frivolous	O
,	O
but	O
because	O
they	O
are	O
immature	O
children	O
over	O
at	O
CNN	O
,	O
it	O
's	O
not	O
surprising	O
,	O
and	O
frankly	O
,	O
it	O
's	O
no	O
surprise	O
coming	O
from	O
Fox	O
either	O
.	O

White	O
House	O
Press	O
Secretary	O
Sarah	O
Sanders	O
called	O
the	O
CNN	O
lawsuit	O
"	O
grandstanding	B-PROP
.	O
"	O

I	O
wonder	O
what	O
she	O
will	O
call	O
the	O
amicus	O
brief	O
from	O
Fox	O
.	O

"	O
This	B-PROP
is	I-PROP
just	I-PROP
more	I-PROP
grandstanding	I-PROP
from	I-PROP
CNN	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
and	O
we	B-PROP
will	I-PROP
vigorously	B-PROP
defend	I-PROP
against	I-PROP
this	I-PROP
lawsuit	I-PROP
,	O
”	O
Sanders	O
said	O
.	O

“	O
CNN	O
,	O
who	O
has	O
nearly	O
50	O
additional	O
hard	O
pass	O
holders	O
,	O
and	O
Mr.	O
Acosta	O
is	O
no	O
more	O
or	O
less	O
special	O
than	O
any	O
other	O
media	O
outlet	O
or	O
reporter	O
with	O
respect	O
to	O
the	O
First	O
Amendment	O
.	O

After	O
Mr.	O
Acosta	O
asked	O
the	O
President	O
two	O
questions	O
—	O
each	O
of	O
which	O
the	O
President	O
answered	O
—	O
he	O
physically	O
refused	O
to	O
surrender	O
a	O
White	O
House	O
microphone	O
to	O
an	O
intern	O
,	O
so	O
that	O
other	O
reporters	O
might	O
ask	O
their	O
questions	O
.	O

This	O
was	O
not	O
the	O
first	O
time	O
this	O
reporter	O
has	O
inappropriately	O
refused	O
to	O
yield	O
to	O
other	O
reporters	O
.	O
”	O

Of	O
course	O
,	O
CNN	O
was	O
thrilled	O
as	O
Fox	O
more	O
than	O
likely	O
helped	O
them	O
grow	O
a	O
little	O
in	O
ratings	O
by	O
issuing	O
support	O
.	O

The	O
propaganda	O
outlet	O
tweeted	O
out	O
Fox	O
's	O
statement	O
.	O

Fox	O
News	O
will	O
file	O
an	O
amicus	O
brief	O
in	O
support	O
of	O
@Acosta	O
and	O
CNN	O
.	O

Thank	O
you	O
@FoxNews	O
!	O

Statement	O
from	O
Jay	O
Wallace	O
below	O
:	O
pic.twitter.com/1EyRkho0TK	O
—	O
CNN	O
Communications	O
(	O
@CNNPR	O
)	O
November	O
14	O
,	O
2018	O

Here	O
's	O
the	O
thing	O
,	O
if	O
it	O
is	O
a	O
right	O
to	O
have	O
a	O
press	O
pass	O
to	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
,	O
where	O
is	O
mine	O
?	O

and	O
yours	O
?	O

How	O
about	O
Infowars	O
?	O

See	O
?	O

It	O
is	O
n't	O
a	O
right	O
and	O
Fox	O
News	O
just	O
pulled	O
the	O
mask	O
off	O
,	O
people	O
.	O

Do	O
you	O
see	O
who	O
they	O
really	O
are	O
now	O
?	O

If	O
not	O
,	O
I	O
ca	O
n't	O
help	O
you	O
.	O

Court	O
orders	O
White	O
House	O
to	O
restore	O
CNN	O
correspondent	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
’s	O
press	O
credential	O

CNN	O
has	O
won	O
the	O
first	O
round	O
of	O
its	O
legal	O
battle	O
to	O
get	O
correspondent	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
back	O
in	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
.	O

U.S.	O
District	O
Court	O
Judge	O
Timothy	O
Kelly	O
granted	O
the	O
cable	O
news	O
network	O
’s	O
request	O
for	O
a	O
temporary	O
restraining	O
order	O
and	O
preliminary	O
injunction	O
Friday	O
that	O
restored	O
Acosta	O
’s	O
White	O
House	O
press	O
credential	O
.	O

Kelly	O
ordered	O
that	O
Acosta	O
be	O
reinstated	O
immediately	O
.	O

He	O
did	O
not	O
rule	O
on	O
CNN	O
’s	O
claim	O
that	O
the	O
revocation	O
of	O
the	O
journalist	O
’s	O
pass	O
violated	O
his	O
rights	O
under	O
the	O
First	O
Amendment	O
.	O

But	O
he	O
said	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
did	O
not	O
provide	O
Acosta	O
with	O
due	O
process	O
to	O
legally	O
remove	O
his	O
pass	O
.	O

The	O
ruling	O
followed	O
a	O
court	O
hearing	O
held	O
Wednesday	O
in	O
Washington	O
,	O
where	O
lawyers	O
for	O
CNN	O
and	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
faced	O
off	O
over	O
the	O
issue	O
of	O
press	O
access	O
.	O

CNN	O
had	O
the	O
broad	O
support	O
of	O
other	O
news	O
organizations	O
that	O
believed	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
’s	O
actions	O
posed	O
a	O
challenge	O
to	O
press	O
freedom	O
.	O

“	O
We	O
are	O
gratified	O
with	O
this	O
result	O
and	O
we	O
look	O
forward	O
to	O
a	O
full	O
resolution	O
in	O
the	O
coming	O
days	O
,	O
”	O
a	O
CNN	O
representative	O
said	O
in	O
a	O
statement	O
.	O

“	O
Our	O
sincere	O
thanks	O
to	O
all	O
who	O
have	O
supported	O
not	O
just	O
CNN	O
,	O
but	O
a	O
free	O
,	O
strong	O
and	O
independent	O
American	O
press	O
.	O
”	O

The	O
White	O
House	O
said	O
it	O
would	O
abide	O
by	O
Kelly	O
’s	O
ruling	O
.	O

“	O
Today	O
,	O
the	O
court	O
made	O
clear	O
there	O
is	O
no	O
absolute	O
right	O
to	O
access	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
.	O

In	O
response	O
to	O
the	O
court	O
,	O
we	O
will	O
temporarily	O
reinstate	O
the	O
reporter	O
’s	O
hard	O
pass	O
,	O
”	O
White	O
House	O
press	O
secretary	O
Sarah	O
Huckabee	O
Sanders	O
said	O
in	O
a	O
statement	O
.	O

“	O
We	O
will	O
also	O
further	O
develop	O
rules	O
and	O
processes	O
to	O
ensure	O
fair	O
and	O
orderly	O
press	O
conferences	O
in	O
the	O
future	O
.	O

There	O
must	O
be	O
decorum	O
in	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
.	O
”	O

Acosta	O
’s	O
press	O
credential	O
was	O
revoked	O
by	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
on	O
Nov.	O
7	O
after	O
a	O
testy	B-PROP
exchange	O
with	O
President	O
Donald	O
Trump	O
at	O
a	O
White	O
House	O
news	O
conference	O
.	O

At	O
one	O
point	O
,	O
Acosta	O
refused	O
to	O
relinquish	O
the	O
microphone	O
to	O
a	O
White	O
House	O
aide	O
who	O
tried	O
to	O
retrieve	O
it	O
from	O
him	O
.	O

It	O
was	O
the	O
latest	O
in	O
a	O
series	O
of	O
public	O
confrontations	O
between	O
Acosta	O
and	O
Trump	O
,	O
who	O
has	O
repeatedly	O
characterized	O
CNN	O
’s	O
critical	O
coverage	O
of	O
him	O
as	O
“	O
fake	B-PROP
news	O
”	O
since	O
the	O
2016	O
presidential	O
campaign	O
.	O

CNN	O
’s	O
suit	O
filed	O
Tuesday	O
says	O
the	O
suspension	O
of	O
Acosta	O
’s	O
credential	O
violates	O
the	O
First	O
Amendment	O
’s	O
protection	O
of	O
free	O
speech	O
.	O

It	O
also	O
says	O
the	O
way	O
the	O
administration	O
revoked	O
the	O
pass	O
,	O
with	O
no	O
direct	O
notice	O
to	O
Acosta	O
or	O
a	O
written	O
explanation	O
detailing	O
the	O
decision	O
,	O
violated	O
the	O
Fifth	O
Amendment	O
’s	O
protection	O
of	O
due	O
process	O
and	O
the	O
federal	O
Administrative	O
Procedures	O
Act	O
.	O

“	O
This	O
severe	B-PROP
and	I-PROP
unprecedented	I-PROP
punishment	O
is	O
the	O
culmination	O
of	O
years	O
of	O
hostility	O
by	O
President	O
Trump	O
against	O
CNN	O
and	O
Acosta	O
based	O
on	O
the	O
contents	O
of	O
their	O
reporting	O
—	O
an	O
unabashed	B-PROP
attempt	I-PROP
to	O
censor	O
the	O
press	O
and	O
exclude	O
reporters	O
from	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
who	O
challenge	O
and	O
dispute	O
the	O
president	O
’s	O
point	O
of	O
view	O
,	O
”	O
the	O
suit	O
says	O
.	O

Responding	O
to	O
the	O
CNN	O
suit	O
,	O
lawyers	O
for	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
said	O
the	O
Trump	O
administration	O
had	O
broad	O
discretion	O
to	O
regulate	O
access	O
to	O
journalists	O
and	O
other	O
members	O
of	O
the	O
public	O
.	O

“	O
If	O
the	O
president	O
wants	O
to	O
exclude	O
all	O
reporters	O
from	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
grounds	O
,	O
he	O
has	O
the	O
authority	O
to	O
do	O
that	O
,	O
”	O
Deputy	O
Assistant	O
Attorney	O
General	O
James	O
Burnham	O
said	O
during	O
the	O
hearing	O
.	O

“	O
There	B-PROP
’s	I-PROP
no	I-PROP
First	I-PROP
Amendment	I-PROP
right	I-PROP
.	I-PROP
”	I-PROP

The	O
White	O
House	O
argued	O
that	O
Acosta	O
’s	O
behavior	O
,	O
which	O
it	O
described	O
as	O
rude	B-PROP
and	O
aggressive	O
,	O
was	O
the	O
reason	O
for	O
revoking	O
his	O
credential	O
.	O

Mark	O
Lukasiewicz	O
,	O
dean	O
of	O
The	O
Lawrence	O
Herbert	O
School	O
of	O
Communication	O
at	O
Hofstra	O
University	O
and	O
a	O
former	O
network	O
news	O
executive	O
,	O
praised	O
the	O
judge	O
’s	O
decision	O
,	O
which	O
he	O
said	O
was	O
not	O
a	O
surprise	O
.	O

“	O
The	O
White	O
House	O
has	O
lots	O
of	O
other	O
ways	O
to	O
deal	O
with	O
the	O
behavior	O
of	O
reporters	O
if	O
that	O
’s	O
their	O
concern	O
,	O
but	O
closing	O
the	O
gate	O
to	O
a	O
news	O
organization	O
is	O
not	O
one	O
of	O
these	O
ways	O
,	O
and	O
it	O
’s	O
important	O
that	O
the	O
court	O
stood	O
up	O
and	O
said	O
that	O
,	O
”	O
Lukasiewicz	O
said	O
.	O

“	O
It	O
’s	O
not	O
the	O
first	O
time	O
a	O
reporter	O
has	O
behaved	O
in	O
a	O
way	O
that	O
a	O
president	O
does	O
n’t	O
like	O
.	O
”	O

Lukasiewicz	O
believed	O
CNN	O
would	O
reach	O
a	O
compromise	O
with	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
rather	O
than	O
engage	O
in	O
a	O
prolonged	O
court	O
battle	O
.	O

“	O
The	O
law	O
and	O
the	O
Constitution	O
is	O
very	O
clear	O
here	O
,	O
”	O
he	O
said	O
.	O

CNN	O
’s	O
suit	O
received	O
the	O
support	O
of	O
more	O
than	O
a	O
dozen	O
news	O
organizations	O
including	O
Fox	O
News	O
,	O
where	O
commentators	O
have	O
often	O
echoed	O
Trump	O
’s	O
criticisms	O
of	O
the	O
network	O
’s	O
coverage	O
.	O

Rival	O
news	O
organizations	O
came	O
to	O
the	O
defense	O
of	O
Fox	O
News	O
in	O
2009	O
when	O
the	O
Obama	O
administration	O
attempted	O
to	O
exclude	O
its	O
reporters	O
from	O
interviews	O
with	O
officials	O
that	O
were	O
offered	O
to	O
all	O
other	O
outlets	O
.	O

Fox	O
News	O
commentators	O
were	O
President	O
Barack	O
Obama	O
’s	O
harshest	B-PROP
critics	I-PROP
during	O
his	O
eight	O
years	O
in	O
office	O
,	O
and	O
he	O
often	O
complained	O
about	O
it	O
in	O
public	O
and	O
private	O
.	O

But	O
the	O
press	O
credentials	O
for	O
its	O
conservative	O
-	O
leaning	O
network	O
were	O
never	O
revoked	O
.	O

Fox	O
News	O
,	O
The	O
Washington	O
Post	O
,	O
NBC	O
News	O
,	O
The	O
Associated	O
Press	O
and	O
the	O
Los	O
Angeles	O
Times	O
are	O
among	O
the	O
entities	O
that	O
have	O
said	O
they	O
will	O
file	O
amicus	O
briefs	O
on	O
behalf	O
of	O
CNN	O
.	O

—	O
Stephen	O
Battaglio	O

Los	O
Angeles	O
Times	O

—	O
—	O
—	O

©	O
2018	O
Los	O
Angeles	O
Times	O
,	O
Distributed	O
by	O
Tribune	O
Content	O
Agency	O
,	O
LLC	O
.	O

Trump	O
Vows	O
to	O
Kick	O
CNN	O
’s	O
Acosta	O
Out	O
Again	O

President	O
Trump	O
took	O
CNN	O
’s	O
improbable	O
court	O
victory	O
temporarily	O
restoring	O
CNN	O
White	O
House	O
correspondent	O
Jim	O
Acosta	O
’s	O
“	O
hard	O
pass	O
”	O
media	O
credential	O
for	O
the	O
executive	O
mansion	O
in	O
stride	O
,	O
vowing	O
to	O
kick	O
Acosta	O
out	O
again	O
in	O
the	O
future	O
if	O
he	O
breaches	O
White	O
House	O
protocol	O
again	O
.	O

The	O
yanking	O
of	O
the	O
physical	O
credential	O
,	O
by	O
the	O
way	O
,	O
is	O
n’t	O
exactly	O
a	O
grave	O
hardship	O
.	O

It	O
just	O
means	O
Acosta	O
would	O
need	O
to	O
make	O
an	O
appointment	O
through	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
press	O
office	O
every	O
time	O
he	O
wanted	O
to	O
visit	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
grounds	O
,	O
just	O
as	O
the	O
rest	O
of	O
the	O
non	O
-	O
hard	O
pass	O
-	O
holding	O
journalists	O
who	O
do	O
n’t	O
work	O
for	O
big	O
media	O
outlets	O
like	O
CNN	O
have	O
to	O
do	O
.	O

Lacking	O
a	O
hard	O
pass	O
does	O
not	O
prevent	O
anyone	O
from	O
reporting	O
on	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
.	O

Speaking	O
to	O
Chris	O
Wallace	O
of	O
Fox	O
News	O
Channel	O
in	O
an	O
interview	O
that	O
aired	O
Sunday	O
,	O
Trump	O
had	O
some	O
new	O
ideas	O
on	O
how	O
to	O
deal	O
with	O
Acosta	O
,	O
who	O
picks	B-PROP
fights	I-PROP
with	O
him	O
during	O
pressers	O
.	O

"	O
I	O
think	O
one	O
of	O
the	O
things	O
we	O
’ll	O
do	O
is	O
maybe	O
turn	O
the	O
camera	O
off	O
that	O
faces	O
them	O
,	O
because	O
then	O
they	O
do	O
n’t	O
have	O
any	O
air	O
time	O
,	O
although	O
I	O
’ll	O
probably	O
be	O
sued	O
for	O
that	O
and	O
maybe	O
,	O
you	O
know	O
,	O
win	O
or	O
lose	O
it	O
,	O
who	B-PROP
knows	I-PROP
,	O
"	O
Trump	O
said	O
.	O

"	O
I	O
mean	O
,	O
with	O
this	O
stuff	O
you	B-PROP
never	I-PROP
know	I-PROP
what	I-PROP
’s	I-PROP
going	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
happen	I-PROP
.	O
"	O

The	O
president	O
described	O
Acosta	O
as	O
"	O
unbelievably	B-PROP
rude	I-PROP
to	O
[	O
White	O
House	O
Press	O
Secretary	O
]	O
Sarah	O
Huckabee	O
,	O
who	B-PROP
’s	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
wonderful	I-PROP
woman	I-PROP
,	O
"	O
and	O
said	O
his	O
administration	O
is	O
drawing	O
up	O
"	O
rules	O
and	O
regulations	O
"	O
for	O
White	O
House	O
reporters	O
.	O

"	O
And	O
if	O
he	O
misbehaves	O
,	O
we	O
’ll	O
throw	O
him	O
out	O
or	O
we	O
’ll	O
stop	O
the	O
news	O
conference	O
,	O
"	O
Trump	O
said	O
.	O

Acosta	O
’s	O
hard	O
pass	O
was	O
pulled	O
after	O
a	O
contentious	B-PROP
Nov.	O
7	O
press	O
conference	O
at	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
.	O

After	O
interacting	O
with	O
President	O
Trump	O
–	O
Acosta	O
said	O
he	O
wanted	O
to	O
“	O
challenge	O
”	O
him	O
on	O
calling	O
the	O
Central	O
American	O
caravans	O
an	O
“	O
invasion	B-PROP
”	O
–	O
the	O
president	O
called	O
upon	O
another	O
reporter	O
to	O
speak	O
.	O

After	O
lecturing	O
Trump	O
,	O
Acosta	O
belligerently	B-PROP
refused	O
to	O
yield	O
the	O
microphone	O
to	O
a	O
White	O
House	O
staffer	O
and	O
pushed	O
her	O
arm	O
away	O
as	O
she	O
reached	O
for	O
the	O
device	O
,	O
all	O
of	O
which	O
was	O
captured	O
on	O
video	O
.	O

On	O
Nov.	O
16	O
,	O
U.S.	O
District	O
Judge	O
Timothy	O
J.	O
Kelly	O
of	O
Washington	O
,	O
D.C.	O
,	O
who	O
was	O
appointed	O
by	O
Trump	O
,	O
ruled	O
against	O
the	O
administration	O
and	O
ordered	O
Acosta	O
’s	O
hard	O
pass	O
restored	O
for	O
14	O
days	O
,	O
pending	O
further	O
hearings	O
in	O
the	O
lawsuit	O
.	O

But	O
it	O
was	O
not	O
a	O
vindication	O
of	O
Acosta	O
’s	O
free	O
speech	O
rights	O
under	O
the	O
First	O
Amendment	O
.	O

The	O
judge	O
specifically	O
said	O
that	O
the	O
First	O
Amendment	O
claim	O
made	O
by	O
Acosta	O
and	O
CNN	O
had	O
not	O
yet	O
been	O
adjudicated	O
and	O
added	O
that	O
the	O
president	O
was	O
free	O
not	O
to	O
call	O
on	O
Acosta	O
at	O
future	O
press	O
conferences	O
.	O

The	O
temporary	O
restraining	O
order	O
was	O
nowhere	O
to	O
be	O
found	O
online	O
at	O
press	O
time	O
,	O
but	O
according	O
to	O
media	O
reports	O
,	O
Kelly	O
found	O
that	O
the	O
administration	O
violated	O
Acosta	O
’s	O
due	O
process	O
rights	O
under	O
the	O
Fifth	O
Amendment	O
to	O
the	O
Constitution	O
.	O

The	O
White	O
House	O
vowed	O
to	O
remedy	O
the	O
situation	O
by	O
drawing	O
up	O
rules	O
governing	O
press	O
conferences	O
.	O

The	O
U.S.	O
Department	O
of	O
Justice	O
said	O
the	O
court	O
ruling	O
was	O
disappointing	O
.	O

“	O
The	O
President	O
has	O
broad	O
authority	O
to	O
regulate	O
access	O
to	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
,	O
including	O
to	O
ensure	O
fair	O
and	O
orderly	O
White	O
House	O
events	O
and	O
press	O
conferences	O
.	O

We	O
look	O
forward	O
to	O
continuing	O
to	O
defend	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
's	O
lawful	O
actions	O
.	O
"	O

Acosta	O
ignorantly	B-PROP
blathered	I-PROP
on	I-PROP
to	O
reporters	O
when	O
he	O
returned	O
to	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
Friday	O
after	O
the	O
court	O
ruling	O
,	O
incorrectly	B-PROP
claiming	I-PROP
he	I-PROP
won	I-PROP
a	I-PROP
great	I-PROP
First	I-PROP
Amendment	I-PROP
victory	I-PROP
.	O

"	O
I	O
'm	O
very	O
grateful	O
for	O
what	O
happened	O
today	O
,	O
"	O
Acosta	O
said	O
.	O

"	O
I	O
'm	O
grateful	O
for	O
my	O
colleagues	O
in	O
the	O
press	O
who	O
stood	O
by	O
us	O
through	O
all	O
of	O
this	O
.	O
"	O

"	O
This	O
was	O
a	O
test	O
and	O
I	O
think	O
we	O
passed	O
the	O
test	O
,	O
"	O
he	O
said	O
.	O

"	O
Journalists	B-PROP
need	I-PROP
to	I-PROP
know	O
that	O
in	B-PROP
this	I-PROP
country	I-PROP
their	I-PROP
First	I-PROP
Amendment	I-PROP
rights	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
freedom	I-PROP
of	I-PROP
the	I-PROP
press	I-PROP
are	I-PROP
sacred	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
they	I-PROP
're	I-PROP
protected	I-PROP
in	I-PROP
our	I-PROP
Constitution	I-PROP
,	I-PROP
"	O
Acosta	O
said	O
.	O

"	O
Throughout	O
all	O
of	O
this	O
I	O
was	O
confident	O
and	O
I	O
thought	O
that	O
this	O
would	O
be	O
the	O
result	O
at	O
the	O
end	O
of	O
the	O
day	O
that	O
our	O
rights	O
would	O
be	O
protected	O
as	O
we	O
continue	O
to	O
cover	O
our	O
government	O
and	O
hold	O
our	O
leaders	O
accountable	O
.	O
"	O

The	O
court	O
case	O
is	O
n’t	O
over	O
yet	O
.	O

The	O
legal	O
antagonists	O
have	O
to	O
report	O
to	O
the	O
court	O
Monday	O
afternoon	O
.	O

The	O
court	O
ordered	O
the	O
parties	O
to	O
“	O
file	O
a	O
joint	O
status	O
report	O
proposing	O
how	O
they	O
would	O
like	O
to	O
proceed	O
in	O
this	O
case	O
by	O
3:00	O
p.m.	O
on	O
November	O
19	O
,	O
2018	O
[	O
,	O
]	O
”	O
according	O
to	O
its	O
online	O
docket	O
.	O

According	O
to	O
CNN	O
,	O
“	O
White	O
House	O
officials	O
sent	O
Acosta	O
a	O
letter	O
stating	O
that	O
his	O
pass	O
is	O
set	O
to	O
be	O
suspended	O
again	O
once	O
the	O
restraining	O
order	O
expires	O
.	O
”	O

From	O
the	O
looks	O
of	O
the	O
letter	O
,	O
the	O
W.H.	O

is	O
trying	O
to	O
establish	O
a	O
paper	O
trail	O
that	O
will	O
empower	O
the	O
administration	O
to	O
boot	O
Acosta	O
again	O
at	O
the	O
end	O
of	O
the	O
month	O
.	O

CNN	O
responded	O
with	O
this	O
statement	O
on	O
Sunday	O
:	O
"	O
The	O
White	O
House	O
is	O
continuing	O
to	O
violate	O
the	O
First	O
and	O
5th	O
Amendments	O
of	O
the	O
Constitution	O
.	O

These	O
actions	O
threaten	B-PROP
all	O
journalists	O
and	O
news	O
organizations	O
.	O

Jim	O
Acosta	O
and	O
CNN	O
will	O
continue	O
to	O
report	O
the	O
news	O
about	O
the	O
White	O
House	O
and	O
the	O
President	O
.	O
"	O

The	O
Acosta	O
-	O
CNN	O
lawsuit	O
was	O
filed	O
by	O
Ted	O
Boutrous	O
and	O
Trump	B-PROP
-	I-PROP
hating	I-PROP
Republican	I-PROP
lawyer	I-PROP
Ted	O
Olson	O
,	O
of	O
the	O
law	O
firm	O
Gibson	O
,	O
Dunn	O
,	O
and	O
Crutcher	O
.	O

Olson	O
was	O
solicitor	O
general	O
in	O
President	O
George	O
W.	O
Bush	O
’s	O
administration	O
.	O

(	O
The	O
legal	O
complaint	O
may	O
be	O
viewed	O
here	O
.	O
)	O

Boutrous	O
said	O
CNN	O
is	O
prepared	O
to	O
dig	O
in	O
for	O
a	O
protracted	O
legal	O
fight	O
if	O
it	O
needs	O
to	O
.	O

"	O
We	O
're	O
ready	O
to	O
litigate	O
as	O
long	O
as	O
we	O
have	O
to	O
,	O
to	O
protect	O
these	O
First	O
Amendment	O
rights	O
,	O
to	O
ask	O
the	O
court	O
to	O
declare	O
rules	O
of	O
the	O
road	O
going	O
forward	O
,	O
"	O
he	O
said	O
.	O