diff --git "a/test_predictions.txt" "b/test_predictions.txt"
new file mode 100644--- /dev/null
+++ "b/test_predictions.txt"
@@ -0,0 +1,70467 @@
+Police	O
+had	O
+previously	O
+gone	O
+to	O
+home	O
+where	O
+Ohio	O
+patrol	O
+officers	O
+were	O
+killed	O
+
+CLEVELAND	O
+—	O
+Police	O
+invstigating	O
+domestic	O
+disputes	O
+had	O
+previously	O
+gone	O
+to	O
+the	O
+home	O
+where	O
+a	O
+man	O
+fatally	O
+shot	O
+two	O
+police	O
+officers	O
+over	O
+the	O
+weekend	O
+,	O
+but	O
+no	O
+arrests	O
+were	O
+ever	O
+made	O
+,	O
+police	O
+reports	O
+from	O
+the	O
+Columbus	O
+suburb	O
+of	O
+Westerville	O
+show	O
+.	O
+
+Westerville	O
+Officers	O
+Eric	O
+Joering	O
+,	O
+39	O
+,	O
+and	O
+Anthony	O
+Morelli	O
+,	O
+54	O
+,	O
+were	O
+killed	O
+shortly	O
+after	O
+noon	O
+Saturday	O
+in	O
+this	O
+normally	O
+quiet	O
+suburb	O
+while	O
+responding	O
+to	O
+a	O
+911	O
+hang	O
+-	O
+up	O
+call	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+suspect	O
+,	O
+30-year	O
+-	O
+old	O
+Quentin	O
+Smith	O
+,	O
+was	O
+shot	O
+and	O
+wounded	O
+by	O
+the	O
+officers	O
+and	O
+taken	O
+to	O
+Ohio	O
+State	O
+University	O
+Wexner	O
+Medical	O
+Center	O
+in	O
+critical	O
+condition	O
+Saturday	O
+.	O
+
+Advertisement	O
+
+A	O
+series	O
+of	O
+911	O
+calls	O
+released	O
+by	O
+the	O
+city	O
+of	O
+Westerville	O
+provide	O
+some	O
+details	O
+about	O
+what	O
+happened	O
+Saturday	O
+at	O
+a	O
+complex	O
+of	O
+town	O
+houses	O
+.	O
+
+Smith	O
+lived	O
+there	O
+with	O
+his	O
+wife	O
+,	O
+Candace	O
+,	O
+and	O
+a	O
+young	O
+daughter	O
+.	O
+
+Get	O
+Ground	O
+Game	O
+in	O
+your	O
+inbox	O
+:	O
+Daily	O
+updates	O
+and	O
+analysis	O
+on	O
+national	O
+politics	O
+from	O
+James	O
+Pindell	O
+.	O
+
+Sign	O
+Up	O
+Thank	O
+you	O
+for	O
+signing	O
+up	O
+!	O
+
+Sign	O
+up	O
+for	O
+more	O
+newsletters	O
+here	O
+
+Westerville	O
+Police	O
+Chief	O
+Joe	O
+Morbitzer	O
+said	O
+at	O
+a	O
+news	O
+conference	O
+Saturday	O
+that	O
+Joering	O
+and	O
+Morelli	O
+were	O
+shot	O
+immediately	O
+upon	O
+entering	O
+.	O
+
+After	O
+the	O
+initial	O
+hang	O
+-	O
+up	O
+call	O
+at	O
+noon	O
+,	O
+a	O
+dispatcher	O
+called	O
+the	O
+number	O
+back	O
+and	O
+reached	O
+a	O
+woman	O
+who	O
+was	O
+crying	O
+and	O
+could	O
+be	O
+heard	O
+saying	O
+,	O
+‘	O
+‘	O
+wo	O
+n’t	O
+let	O
+me	O
+in	O
+.	O
+’	O
+’	O
+
+Officers	O
+were	O
+then	O
+sent	O
+to	O
+the	O
+home	O
+.	O
+
+At	O
+12:12	O
+p.m.	O
+,	O
+an	O
+officer	O
+tells	O
+a	O
+dispatcher	O
+that	O
+it	O
+’s	O
+‘	O
+‘	O
+all	O
+quiet	O
+right	O
+now	O
+,	O
+’	O
+’	O
+followed	O
+by	O
+a	O
+door	O
+knock	O
+.	O
+
+At	O
+12:13	O
+p.m.	O
+,	O
+after	O
+a	O
+dispatcher	O
+confirmed	O
+contact	O
+has	O
+been	O
+made	O
+,	O
+a	O
+man	O
+’s	O
+voice	O
+could	O
+be	O
+heard	O
+yelling	O
+,	O
+‘	O
+‘	O
+We	O
+have	O
+shots	O
+fired	O
+.	O
+’	O
+’	O
+
+Four	O
+minutes	O
+later	O
+,	O
+someone	O
+,	O
+presumably	O
+a	O
+police	O
+officer	O
+,	O
+told	O
+a	O
+dispatcher	O
+:	O
+‘	O
+‘	O
+We	O
+have	O
+two	O
+officers	O
+down	O
+.	O
+
+Child	O
+on	O
+couch	O
+,	O
+one	O
+at	O
+gunpoint	O
+.	O
+’	O
+’	O
+
+Advertisement	O
+
+ASSOCIATED	O
+PRESS	O
+
+America	O
+'s	O
+Immigration	O
+Voice	O
+.	O
+
+Earlier	O
+,	O
+I	O
+blogged	O
+that	O
+the	O
+police	O
+had	O
+released	O
+the	O
+name	O
+of	O
+the	O
+suspect	O
+in	O
+the	O
+murder	O
+of	O
+two	O
+white	O
+Westerville	O
+,	O
+OH	O
+cops	O
+(	O
+Quentin	O
+Lamar	O
+Smith	O
+)	O
+but	O
+no	O
+picture	O
+had	O
+appeared	O
+.	O
+
+I	O
+found	O
+the	O
+picture	O
+at	O
+right	O
+on	O
+a	O
+Mugshots	O
+site	O
+,	O
+attributed	O
+to	O
+a	O
+guy	O
+with	O
+the	O
+same	O
+name	O
+,	O
+in	O
+the	O
+same	O
+town	O
+.	O
+
+(	O
+Most	O
+people	O
+named	O
+Quentin	O
+Lamar	O
+Smith	O
+are	O
+black	O
+,	O
+by	O
+the	O
+way	O
+.	O
+)	O
+
+Police	O
+charge	O
+suspect	O
+in	O
+death	O
+of	O
+two	O
+Westerville	O
+Police	O
+officers	O
+Quentin	O
+Lamar	O
+Smith	O
+was	O
+charged	O
+with	O
+two	O
+counts	O
+of	O
+aggravated	O
+murder	O
+on	O
+Sunday	O
+By	O
+WCMH	O
+Staff	O
+and	O
+The	O
+Associated	O
+Press	O
+Published	O
+:	O
+February	O
+11	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+,	O
+4:45	O
+pm	O
+Updated	O
+:	O
+February	O
+11	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+,	O
+6:02	O
+pm	O
+WESTERVILLE	O
+,	O
+OH	O
+(	O
+WCMH	O
+/	O
+AP	O
+)	O
+—	O
+The	O
+Westerville	O
+Division	O
+of	O
+Police	O
+has	O
+identified	O
+the	O
+suspect	O
+in	O
+the	O
+shooting	O
+death	O
+of	O
+two	O
+police	O
+officers	O
+as	O
+30-year	O
+-	O
+old	O
+Quentin	O
+Lamar	O
+Smith	O
+.	O
+
+Westerville	O
+Police	O
+Chief	O
+Joe	O
+Morbitzer	O
+said	O
+officer	O
+Eric	O
+Joering	O
+,	O
+39	O
+,	O
+died	O
+at	O
+the	O
+scene	O
+and	O
+his	O
+colleague	O
+,	O
+Anthony	O
+Morelli	O
+,	O
+54	O
+,	O
+died	O
+at	O
+a	O
+local	O
+hospital	O
+.	O
+
+Smith	O
+was	O
+charged	O
+with	O
+two	O
+counts	O
+of	O
+aggravated	O
+murder	O
+on	O
+Sunday	O
+.	O
+
+Morbitzer	O
+said	O
+the	O
+officers	O
+were	O
+responding	O
+to	O
+a	O
+“	O
+potential	O
+domestic	O
+situation	O
+.	O
+”	O
+A	O
+neighbor	O
+who	O
+heard	O
+the	O
+gunfire	O
+said	O
+it	O
+happened	O
+at	O
+a	O
+home	O
+where	O
+the	O
+occupants	O
+were	O
+“	O
+always	O
+arguing	O
+and	O
+fighting	O
+.	O
+”	O
+“	O
+The	O
+officers	O
+gave	O
+their	O
+lives	O
+in	O
+defense	O
+of	O
+others	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Morbitzer	O
+said	O
+during	O
+a	O
+news	O
+conference	O
+,	O
+struggling	O
+to	O
+keep	O
+his	O
+emotions	O
+in	O
+check	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+called	O
+them	O
+“	O
+true	B-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+heroes	I-PROP
+.	O
+”	O
+The	O
+Columbus	O
+Police	O
+Department	O
+is	O
+investigating	O
+the	O
+shootings	O
+.	O
+
+Police	O
+released	O
+incident	O
+reports	O
+showing	O
+officers	O
+had	O
+been	O
+to	O
+Smith	O
+’s	O
+home	O
+or	O
+had	O
+dealings	O
+with	O
+him	O
+several	O
+times	O
+since	O
+2017	O
+,	O
+some	O
+for	O
+alleged	O
+domestic	O
+violence	O
+involving	O
+a	O
+woman	O
+identified	O
+in	O
+the	O
+reports	O
+as	O
+his	O
+wife	O
+,	O
+Candace	O
+Smith	O
+.	O
+
+Authorities	O
+said	O
+he	O
+was	O
+wounded	O
+and	O
+was	O
+treated	O
+at	O
+a	O
+hospital	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+a	O
+Nov.	O
+29	O
+incident	O
+,	O
+Candace	O
+Smith	O
+,	O
+33	O
+,	O
+went	O
+to	O
+a	O
+police	O
+station	O
+and	O
+asked	O
+about	O
+protection	O
+orders	O
+because	O
+she	O
+said	O
+she	O
+and	O
+her	O
+husband	O
+were	O
+n’t	O
+getting	O
+along	O
+and	O
+she	O
+discovered	O
+she	O
+had	O
+a	O
+sexually	O
+transmitted	O
+disease	O
+.	O
+
+She	O
+also	O
+told	O
+police	O
+that	O
+when	O
+she	O
+“	O
+threatens	O
+to	O
+leave	O
+Quentin	O
+,	O
+he	O
+tells	O
+her	O
+that	O
+he	B-PROP
+would	I-PROP
+kill	I-PROP
+her	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+their	I-PROP
+daughter	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+himself	I-PROP
+,	O
+”	O
+the	O
+report	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+Candace	O
+Smith	O
+told	O
+police	O
+her	O
+husband	O
+“	O
+has	O
+a	O
+gun	O
+that	O
+he	O
+carries	O
+all	O
+of	O
+the	O
+time	O
+,	O
+and	O
+if	O
+it	O
+is	O
+n’t	O
+on	O
+him	O
+,	O
+it	O
+is	O
+close	O
+by	O
+.	O
+”	O
+Police	O
+were	O
+called	O
+to	O
+the	O
+home	O
+later	O
+that	O
+night	O
+to	O
+investigate	O
+a	O
+report	O
+of	O
+domestic	O
+violence	O
+.	O
+
+[	O
+More	O
+]	O
+
+Anyhow	O
+,	O
+they	O
+have	O
+now	O
+released	O
+a	O
+different	O
+photo	O
+(	O
+above)and	O
+it	O
+is	O
+the	O
+same	O
+guy	O
+,	O
+and	O
+he	O
+is	O
+black	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+goes	O
+in	O
+our	O
+"	O
+Black	O
+Murders	O
+Of	O
+White	B-PROP
+Cops	O
+"	O
+category	O
+,	O
+and	O
+also	O
+in	O
+our	O
+"	O
+Not	O
+Reporting	O
+Race	O
+"	O
+category	O
+,	O
+since	O
+except	O
+for	O
+the	O
+photograph	O
+,	O
+there	O
+'s	O
+no	O
+mention	O
+of	O
+the	O
+race	O
+issue	O
+.	O
+Officers	O
+Anthony	O
+Morelli	O
+and	O
+Eric	O
+Joering	O
+are	O
+dead	O
+,	O
+and	O
+Smith	O
+is	O
+alive	O
+in	O
+hospital	O
+.	O
+
+If	O
+these	O
+two	O
+men	O
+had	O
+survived	O
+,	O
+and	O
+Quentin	O
+Lamar	O
+Smith	O
+had	O
+died	O
+,	O
+you	O
+'d	O
+be	O
+hearing	O
+a	O
+lot	O
+about	O
+the	O
+race	O
+issue	O
+.	O
+
+Man	O
+arrested	O
+for	O
+allegedly	O
+buying	O
+gun	O
+used	O
+in	O
+killing	O
+of	O
+Ohio	O
+officers	O
+at	O
+scene	O
+of	O
+911	O
+hang	O
+-	O
+up	O
+call	O
+
+A	O
+second	O
+man	O
+has	O
+been	O
+arrested	O
+in	O
+the	O
+slaying	O
+of	O
+two	O
+Ohio	O
+police	O
+officers	O
+for	O
+allegedly	O
+buying	O
+the	O
+gun	O
+using	O
+in	O
+the	O
+killing	O
+,	O
+federal	O
+authorities	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+Gerald	O
+Lawson	O
+III	O
+,	O
+30	O
+,	O
+is	O
+accused	O
+of	O
+acting	O
+as	O
+a	O
+straw	O
+purchaser	O
+for	O
+the	O
+suspect	O
+,	O
+30-year	O
+-	O
+old	O
+Quentin	O
+Lamar	O
+Smith	O
+,	O
+who	O
+is	O
+a	O
+convicted	O
+felon	O
+and	O
+not	O
+permitted	O
+to	O
+buy	O
+a	O
+firearm	O
+,	O
+the	O
+Justice	O
+Department	O
+for	O
+the	O
+Southern	O
+District	O
+of	O
+Ohio	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Saturday	O
+shooting	O
+took	O
+place	O
+when	O
+Westerville	O
+police	O
+officers	O
+Eric	O
+Joering	O
+and	O
+Anthony	O
+Morelli	O
+responded	O
+to	O
+a	O
+911	O
+hang	O
+-	O
+up	O
+Saturday	O
+and	O
+were	O
+"	O
+immediately	O
+met	O
+with	O
+gunfire	O
+"	O
+and	O
+exchanged	O
+fire	O
+with	O
+Smith	O
+,	O
+police	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+Andrew	O
+Welsh	O
+-	O
+Huggins	O
+/	O
+AP	O
+
+Tom	O
+Dodge	O
+/	O
+The	O
+Columbus	O
+Dispatch	O
+via	O
+AP	O
+
+Smith	O
+,	O
+who	O
+allegedly	O
+had	O
+a	O
+Glock	O
+semi	O
+-	O
+automatic	O
+handgun	O
+,	O
+was	O
+also	O
+injured	O
+in	O
+the	O
+shooting	O
+and	O
+is	O
+in	O
+the	O
+hospital	O
+,	O
+authorities	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+is	O
+expected	O
+to	O
+survive	O
+,	O
+police	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Columbus	O
+Division	O
+of	O
+Police	O
+,	O
+which	O
+is	O
+leading	O
+the	O
+investigation	O
+,	O
+has	O
+filed	O
+two	O
+counts	O
+of	O
+aggravated	O
+murder	O
+charges	O
+,	O
+according	O
+to	O
+the	O
+city	O
+of	O
+Westerville	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+has	O
+not	O
+yet	O
+entered	O
+a	O
+plea	O
+.	O
+
+Lawson	O
+and	O
+Smith	O
+"	O
+have	O
+a	O
+long	O
+history	O
+of	O
+friendship	O
+,	O
+"	O
+according	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Justice	O
+Department	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Justice	O
+Department	O
+said	O
+a	O
+witness	O
+told	O
+investigators	O
+Smith	O
+gave	O
+Lawson	O
+money	O
+for	O
+the	O
+firearm	O
+and	O
+an	O
+extra	O
+$	O
+100	O
+as	O
+compensation	O
+.	O
+
+Lawson	O
+was	O
+arrested	O
+today	O
+and	O
+charged	O
+with	O
+aiding	O
+and	O
+abetting	O
+the	O
+possession	O
+of	O
+a	O
+firearm	O
+by	O
+a	O
+prohibited	O
+person	O
+,	O
+the	O
+Justice	O
+Department	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+is	O
+scheduled	O
+to	O
+appear	O
+before	O
+a	O
+judge	O
+this	O
+afternoon	O
+.	O
+
+Tom	O
+Dodge	O
+/	O
+The	O
+Columbus	O
+Dispatch	O
+via	O
+AP	O
+
+Tom	O
+Dodge	O
+/	O
+The	O
+Columbus	O
+Dispatch	O
+via	O
+AP	O
+
+The	O
+officers	O
+were	O
+"	O
+true	B-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+heroes	I-PROP
+"	O
+and	O
+"	O
+were	O
+two	O
+of	O
+the	O
+best	O
+we	O
+had	O
+,	O
+"	O
+Westerville	O
+Police	O
+Chief	O
+Joe	O
+Morbitzer	O
+said	O
+this	O
+weekend	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+This	B-PROP
+was	I-PROP
+their	I-PROP
+calling	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+did	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+right	I-PROP
+,	O
+"	O
+Morbitzer	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+Sam	O
+Greene	O
+/	O
+Cincinnati	O
+Enquirer	O
+via	O
+USA	O
+TODAY	O
+
+Sam	O
+Greene	O
+/	O
+Cincinnati	O
+Enquirer	O
+via	O
+USA	O
+TODAY	O
+
+Ohio	O
+Gov.	O
+
+John	O
+Kasich	O
+today	O
+ordered	O
+all	O
+flags	O
+be	O
+flown	O
+at	O
+half	O
+-	O
+staff	O
+in	O
+the	O
+state	O
+in	O
+honor	O
+of	O
+two	O
+police	O
+officers	O
+,	O
+who	O
+were	O
+gunned	O
+down	O
+in	O
+the	O
+governor	O
+'s	O
+hometown	O
+.	O
+
+A	O
+procession	O
+was	O
+held	O
+this	O
+morning	O
+for	O
+the	O
+fallen	O
+officers	O
+,	O
+leading	O
+from	O
+the	O
+coroner	O
+'s	O
+office	O
+to	O
+the	O
+funeral	O
+homes	O
+.	O
+
+Dozens	O
+of	O
+officers	O
+outside	O
+the	O
+coroners	O
+office	O
+honoring	O
+the	O
+fallen	O
+Westerville	O
+officers	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+’ll	O
+share	O
+the	O
+escort	O
+live	O
+in	O
+a	O
+few	O
+minutes	O
+on	O
+CPD	O
+Facebook	O
+.	O
+
+@tellwesterville	O
+@WestervillePD	O
+pic.twitter.com/OVGUvozPDZ	O
+—	O
+Columbus	O
+Ohio	O
+Police	O
+(	O
+@ColumbusPolice	O
+)	O
+February	O
+12	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+WBNS	O
+
+Morelli	O
+,	O
+54	O
+,	O
+was	O
+a	O
+29-year	O
+veteran	O
+of	O
+the	O
+department	O
+.	O
+
+Westerville	O
+Police	O
+Department	O
+
+Joering	O
+,	O
+39	O
+,	O
+was	O
+a	O
+16-year	O
+veteran	O
+of	O
+the	O
+department	O
+.	O
+
+Westerville	O
+Police	O
+Department	O
+
+Morelli	O
+was	O
+married	O
+with	O
+two	O
+children	O
+and	O
+Joering	O
+was	O
+married	O
+with	O
+four	O
+daughters	O
+,	O
+according	O
+to	O
+The	O
+New	O
+York	O
+Times	O
+.	O
+
+Morelli	O
+'s	O
+and	O
+Joering	O
+'s	O
+families	O
+released	O
+a	O
+statement	O
+saying	O
+how	O
+"	O
+thankful	O
+"	O
+they	O
+are	O
+for	O
+the	O
+Westerville	O
+community	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+We	O
+feel	O
+loved	O
+and	O
+blessed	O
+,	O
+and	O
+we	O
+are	O
+appreciative	O
+of	O
+the	O
+outpouring	O
+of	O
+support	O
+,	O
+"	O
+the	O
+statement	O
+read	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+We	O
+have	O
+seen	O
+and	O
+heard	O
+so	O
+much	O
+from	O
+people	O
+who	O
+have	O
+shared	O
+stories	O
+about	O
+how	O
+our	O
+men	O
+impacted	O
+their	O
+lives	O
+.	O
+
+They	O
+will	O
+be	O
+so	O
+greatly	O
+missed	O
+,	O
+not	O
+only	O
+by	O
+us	O
+,	O
+but	O
+by	O
+everyone	O
+they	O
+touched	O
+.	O
+"	O
+
+The	O
+statement	O
+described	O
+the	O
+fallen	O
+officers	O
+as	O
+"	O
+dedicated	B-PROP
+,	O
+"	O
+both	O
+to	O
+their	O
+jobs	O
+and	O
+as	O
+their	O
+roles	O
+as	O
+fathers	O
+and	O
+husbands	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+We	O
+are	O
+so	O
+sad	O
+that	O
+Eric	O
+will	O
+not	O
+see	O
+his	O
+three	O
+daughters	O
+graduate	O
+from	O
+high	O
+school	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+’re	O
+devastated	B-PROP
+Tony	O
+will	O
+not	O
+be	O
+able	O
+to	O
+walk	O
+his	O
+daughter	O
+down	O
+the	O
+aisle	O
+at	O
+her	O
+wedding	O
+,	O
+"	O
+the	O
+statement	O
+read	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+families	O
+requested	O
+privacy	O
+and	O
+"	O
+time	O
+to	O
+heal	O
+"	O
+to	O
+mourn	O
+the	O
+loss	O
+of	O
+the	O
+officers	O
+.	O
+
+Morbitzer	O
+said	O
+Sunday	O
+that	O
+as	O
+the	O
+department	O
+works	O
+with	O
+the	O
+families	O
+on	O
+funeral	O
+arrangements	O
+,	O
+the	O
+police	O
+"	O
+have	O
+seen	O
+fake	O
+GoFundMe	O
+pages	O
+established	O
+already	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+have	O
+had	O
+people	O
+calling	O
+our	O
+radio	O
+room	O
+screaming	B-PROP
+threats	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+obscenities	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+vulgarities	I-PROP
+at	O
+our	O
+radio	O
+techs	O
+.	O
+
+And	O
+quite	B-PROP
+frankly	I-PROP
+there	I-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+special	I-PROP
+place	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+hell	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+those	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+my	I-PROP
+wish	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+comes	I-PROP
+very	I-PROP
+soon	I-PROP
+.	O
+”	O
+
+President	O
+Donald	O
+Trump	O
+tweeted	O
+Sunday	O
+that	O
+he	O
+spoke	O
+to	O
+Kasich	O
+"	O
+to	O
+express	O
+condolences	O
+and	O
+prayers	O
+to	O
+all	O
+for	O
+the	O
+horrible	B-PROP
+shooting	O
+of	O
+two	O
+great	B-PROP
+police	I-PROP
+officers	I-PROP
+.	O
+"	O
+
+Just	O
+spoke	O
+to	O
+@JohnKasich	O
+to	O
+express	O
+condolences	O
+and	O
+prayers	O
+to	O
+all	O
+for	O
+the	O
+horrible	B-PROP
+shooting	O
+of	O
+two	O
+great	B-PROP
+police	I-PROP
+officers	I-PROP
+from	O
+@WestervillePD	O
+.	O
+
+This	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+true	I-PROP
+tragedy	I-PROP
+!	O
+
+—	O
+Donald	O
+J.	O
+Trump	O
+(	O
+@realDonaldTrump	O
+)	O
+February	O
+11	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+Kasich	O
+tweeted	O
+about	O
+the	O
+shooting	O
+several	O
+times	O
+,	O
+including	O
+to	O
+say	O
+,	O
+"	O
+The	O
+finest	O
+among	O
+us	O
+are	O
+those	O
+who	B-PROP
+risk	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+all	I-PROP
+everyday	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+our	I-PROP
+safety	I-PROP
+,	O
+and	O
+Officers	O
+Anthony	O
+Morelli	O
+and	O
+Eric	O
+Joering	O
+were	O
+those	O
+people	O
+.	O
+
+Their	O
+deaths	O
+are	O
+a	O
+terrible	B-PROP
+tragedy	I-PROP
+for	O
+my	O
+hometown	O
+of	O
+Westerville	O
+and	O
+all	O
+of	O
+Ohio	O
+.	O
+"	O
+
+The	O
+finest	O
+among	O
+us	O
+are	O
+those	O
+who	O
+risk	O
+it	O
+all	O
+everyday	O
+for	O
+our	O
+safety	O
+,	O
+and	O
+Officers	O
+Anthony	O
+Morelli	O
+and	O
+Eric	O
+Joering	O
+were	O
+those	O
+people	O
+.	O
+
+Their	O
+deaths	O
+are	O
+a	O
+terrible	B-PROP
+tragedy	I-PROP
+for	O
+my	O
+hometown	O
+of	O
+Westerville	O
+and	O
+all	O
+of	O
+Ohio	O
+.	O
+
+(	O
+1/2	O
+)	O
+—	O
+John	O
+Kasich	O
+(	O
+@JohnKasich	O
+)	O
+February	O
+10	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+New	O
+York	O
+City	O
+Police	O
+Commissioner	O
+James	O
+O'Neill	O
+also	O
+spoke	O
+out	O
+,	O
+tweeting	O
+,	O
+"	O
+Everyone	B-PROP
+should	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+as	I-PROP
+upset	I-PROP
+about	I-PROP
+this	I-PROP
+as	I-PROP
+America	I-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+law	I-PROP
+enforcement	I-PROP
+officers	I-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+No	B-PROP
+cop	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+anywhere	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+'	I-PROP
+signed	I-PROP
+up	I-PROP
+'	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+murdered	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+"	I-PROP
+
+.	O
+
+@WestervillePD	O
+confirms	O
+2	O
+officers	O
+ambushed	O
+&	O
+killed	O
+today	O
+after	O
+responding	O
+to	O
+a	O
+911	O
+hang	O
+-	O
+up	O
+;	O
+fired	O
+upon	O
+when	O
+they	O
+arrived	O
+at	O
+the	O
+address	O
+.	O
+
+Everyone	B-PROP
+should	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+as	I-PROP
+upset	I-PROP
+about	I-PROP
+this	I-PROP
+as	I-PROP
+America	I-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+law	I-PROP
+enforcement	I-PROP
+officers	I-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+No	B-PROP
+cop	I-PROP
+,	O
+anywhere	O
+,	O
+“	O
+signed	O
+up	O
+”	O
+to	O
+be	O
+murdered	O
+.	O
+
+#	O
+NYPD	O
+pic.twitter.com/JZcso4cguN	O
+—	O
+Commissioner	O
+O'Neill	O
+(	O
+@NYPDONeill	O
+)	O
+February	O
+10	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+Lawson	O
+was	O
+not	O
+required	O
+to	O
+enter	O
+a	O
+plea	O
+in	O
+federal	O
+court	O
+on	O
+Monday	O
+during	O
+a	O
+brief	O
+appearance	O
+,	O
+according	O
+to	O
+The	O
+Associated	O
+Press	O
+.	O
+
+America	O
+'s	O
+Immigration	O
+Voice	O
+.	O
+
+Thanks	O
+for	O
+publicizing	O
+the	O
+race	O
+of	O
+Quentin	O
+Lamar	O
+Smith	O
+.	O
+
+I	O
+tried	O
+for	O
+24	O
+hours	O
+before	O
+I	O
+discovered	O
+the	O
+mugshot	O
+that	O
+you	O
+published	O
+.	O
+
+VDARE.com	O
+was	O
+the	O
+first	O
+news	O
+organization	O
+to	O
+make	O
+his	O
+race	O
+known	O
+,	O
+even	O
+though	O
+he	O
+was	O
+well	O
+known	O
+to	O
+law	O
+enforcement	O
+.	O
+
+It	O
+took	O
+about	O
+10	O
+hours	O
+for	O
+law	O
+enforcement	O
+to	O
+release	O
+his	O
+name	O
+.	O
+
+Quentin	O
+is	O
+a	O
+convicted	B-PROP
+felon	I-PROP
+who	O
+is	O
+not	O
+allowed	O
+to	O
+have	O
+a	O
+gun	O
+,	O
+even	O
+though	O
+he	O
+carried	O
+one	O
+everywhere	O
+.	O
+
+[	O
+Police	O
+shooting	O
+suspect	O
+’s	O
+past	O
+and	O
+police	O
+history	O
+at	O
+the	O
+Westerville	O
+home	O
+,	O
+by	O
+Tara	O
+Morgan	O
+,	O
+ABC6onyourside.com	O
+,	O
+February	O
+11th	O
+2018	O
+]	O
+
+I	O
+have	O
+been	O
+unable	O
+to	O
+determine	O
+the	O
+race	O
+of	O
+Quentin	O
+’s	O
+wife	O
+--	O
+the	O
+domestic	B-PROP
+violence	I-PROP
+victim	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+The	B-PROP
+fact	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+there	I-PROP
+was	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+wedding	I-PROP
+makes	I-PROP
+me	I-PROP
+think	I-PROP
+she	I-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+white	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+Also	O
+,	O
+she	O
+kind	O
+of	O
+sounds	O
+white	O
+in	O
+the	O
+911	O
+calls	O
+,	O
+but	O
+it	O
+’s	O
+hard	O
+to	O
+tell	O
+.	O
+
+Please	B-PROP
+keep	I-PROP
+up	I-PROP
+your	I-PROP
+great	I-PROP
+work	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Humanity	B-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+WIPEOUT	I-PROP
+Foreshadowed	I-PROP
+?	O
+
+World	O
+Health	O
+Chief	O
+:	O
+Global	B-PROP
+Pandemic	I-PROP
+Imminent	I-PROP
+
+According	O
+to	O
+a	O
+World	O
+Health	O
+Organization	O
+doctor	O
+,	O
+a	B-PROP
+global	I-PROP
+pandemic	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+imminent	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+no	I-PROP
+one	I-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+prepared	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+when	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+hits	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Dr.	O
+Tedros	O
+Adhanom	O
+,	O
+director	O
+-	O
+general	O
+for	O
+WHO	O
+,	O
+has	O
+said	O
+that	O
+the	B-PROP
+next	I-PROP
+outbreak	I-PROP
+that	O
+will	O
+hit	O
+us	O
+will	O
+be	O
+a	B-PROP
+“	I-PROP
+terrible	I-PROP
+”	I-PROP
+one	I-PROP
+,	O
+causing	O
+a	O
+large	O
+death	O
+all	O
+over	O
+the	O
+world	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Humanity	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+more	I-PROP
+vulnerable	I-PROP
+in	O
+the	O
+face	O
+of	O
+epidemics	O
+because	O
+we	O
+are	O
+much	O
+more	O
+connected	O
+and	O
+we	O
+travel	O
+around	O
+much	O
+more	O
+quickly	O
+than	O
+before	O
+,	O
+”	O
+said	O
+WHO	O
+specialist	O
+in	O
+infectious	O
+diseases	O
+Dr.	O
+Sylvie	O
+Brand	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+We	O
+know	O
+that	O
+it	O
+is	O
+coming	O
+,	O
+but	O
+we	O
+have	O
+no	O
+way	O
+of	O
+stopping	O
+it	O
+,	O
+”	O
+said	O
+Brand	O
+.	O
+
+According	O
+to	O
+Dr.	O
+Tedros	O
+,	O
+the	B-PROP
+flu	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+extremely	I-PROP
+dangerous	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+everyone	I-PROP
+living	I-PROP
+on	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+planet	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+This	O
+fear	O
+was	O
+also	O
+promoted	O
+by	O
+experts	O
+at	O
+the	O
+World	O
+Economic	O
+Forum	O
+in	O
+Davos	O
+,	O
+Switzerland	O
+last	O
+month	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+claims	O
+came	O
+exactly	O
+100	O
+years	O
+after	O
+the	O
+1918	O
+Spanish	O
+flu	O
+that	O
+claimed	O
+50	O
+million	O
+lives	O
+and	O
+killed	O
+three	O
+times	O
+as	O
+many	O
+people	O
+as	O
+World	O
+War	O
+I.	O
+
+A	O
+mutated	O
+strain	O
+is	O
+the	O
+most	O
+likely	O
+contender	O
+to	O
+wipe	B-PROP
+out	I-PROP
+millions	O
+because	O
+it	O
+can	O
+join	O
+together	O
+with	O
+other	O
+strains	O
+to	O
+become	O
+deadlier	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+This	O
+is	O
+not	O
+some	O
+future	B-PROP
+nightmare	I-PROP
+scenario	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+A	B-PROP
+devastating	I-PROP
+epidemic	I-PROP
+could	I-PROP
+start	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+any	I-PROP
+country	I-PROP
+at	I-PROP
+any	I-PROP
+time	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+kill	I-PROP
+millions	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+because	I-PROP
+we	B-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+still	I-PROP
+not	I-PROP
+prepared	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+The	B-PROP
+world	I-PROP
+remains	I-PROP
+vulnerable	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+We	O
+do	O
+not	O
+know	O
+where	O
+and	O
+when	O
+the	O
+next	O
+global	O
+pandemic	O
+will	O
+occur	O
+,	O
+but	O
+we	O
+know	O
+it	O
+will	O
+take	O
+a	O
+terrible	B-PROP
+toll	I-PROP
+both	O
+on	O
+human	O
+life	O
+and	O
+on	O
+the	O
+economy	O
+,	O
+”	O
+said	O
+Dr.	O
+Tedros	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Hidden	O
+underneath	O
+this	O
+fear	B-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+mongering	I-PROP
+message	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+global	I-PROP
+pandemic	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+a	B-PROP
+far	I-PROP
+more	I-PROP
+sinister	I-PROP
+W.H.O.	I-PROP
+
+agenda	O
+,	O
+”	O
+warns	O
+Mike	O
+Adams	O
+,	O
+the	O
+Health	O
+Ranger	O
+,	O
+publisher	O
+of	O
+Medicine.news	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+The	O
+real	O
+agenda	O
+is	O
+a	B-PROP
+global	I-PROP
+push	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+blind	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+fear	I-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+based	I-PROP
+acceptance	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+unsafe	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+unproven	I-PROP
+vaccines	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+rolled	I-PROP
+out	I-PROP
+alongside	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+next	I-PROP
+global	I-PROP
+pandemic	I-PROP
+,	O
+”	O
+Adams	O
+warns	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Fear	B-PROP
+circumvents	I-PROP
+rational	O
+thinking	O
+,	O
+which	O
+is	O
+why	O
+the	O
+vaccine	B-PROP
+-	O
+pharma	O
+cartels	O
+routinely	O
+turn	O
+to	O
+irrational	B-PROP
+fear	I-PROP
+propaganda	I-PROP
+to	O
+demand	O
+absolute	O
+and	O
+unquestioning	O
+acceptance	O
+of	O
+risky	O
+medical	O
+interventions	O
+that	O
+should	O
+always	O
+be	O
+scrutinized	O
+for	O
+safety	O
+and	O
+efficacy	O
+.	O
+”	O
+–	O
+Natural	O
+News	O
+
+Dr.	O
+Tedros	O
+’	O
+comments	O
+come	O
+on	O
+the	O
+heels	O
+of	O
+the	O
+plague	O
+outbreak	O
+in	O
+Madagascar	O
+,	O
+which	O
+was	O
+the	O
+most	O
+recent	O
+epidemic	O
+to	O
+receive	O
+international	O
+aid	O
+attention	O
+amid	O
+fears	O
+it	O
+would	O
+spread	O
+.	O
+
+More	O
+than	O
+200	O
+people	O
+were	O
+killed	O
+during	O
+the	O
+outbreak	O
+that	O
+ravaged	O
+the	O
+island	O
+over	O
+the	O
+winter	O
+,	O
+which	O
+prompted	O
+10	O
+nearby	O
+African	O
+countries	O
+to	O
+be	O
+placed	O
+on	O
+high	O
+alert	O
+.	O
+
+Trump	O
+fires	O
+Tillerson	O
+,	O
+replaces	O
+with	O
+former	O
+top	O
+spook	O
+
+Following	O
+what	O
+has	O
+appeared	O
+for	O
+months	O
+to	O
+be	O
+a	O
+strained	O
+relationship	O
+between	O
+President	O
+Donald	O
+Trump	O
+and	O
+Secretary	O
+of	O
+State	O
+Rex	O
+Tillerson	O
+,	O
+the	O
+top	O
+diplomat	O
+is	O
+being	O
+replaced	O
+.	O
+
+Trump	O
+announced	O
+Tillerson	O
+’s	O
+ouster	O
+via	O
+Twitter	O
+Tuesday	O
+,	O
+saying	O
+:	O
+“	O
+Mike	O
+Pompeo	O
+,	O
+Director	O
+of	O
+the	O
+CIA	O
+,	O
+will	O
+become	O
+our	O
+new	O
+Secretary	O
+of	O
+State	O
+.	O
+
+He	B-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+fantastic	I-PROP
+job	I-PROP
+!	O
+
+Thank	O
+you	O
+to	O
+Rex	O
+Tillerson	O
+for	O
+his	O
+service	O
+!	O
+
+Gina	O
+Haspel	O
+will	O
+become	O
+the	O
+new	O
+Director	O
+of	O
+the	O
+CIA	O
+,	O
+and	O
+the	O
+first	O
+woman	O
+so	O
+chosen	O
+.	O
+
+Congratulations	B-PROP
+to	O
+all	O
+!	O
+”	O
+
+This	O
+is	O
+yet	O
+another	O
+big	O
+shake	O
+-	O
+up	O
+for	O
+Trump	O
+’s	O
+still	O
+-	O
+young	O
+administration	O
+—	O
+and	O
+it	O
+may	O
+be	O
+the	O
+most	O
+important	O
+one	O
+to	O
+date	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+move	O
+creates	O
+some	O
+big	O
+questions	O
+about	O
+both	O
+the	O
+administration	O
+’s	O
+foreign	O
+policy	O
+ambitions	O
+as	O
+well	O
+as	O
+the	O
+president	O
+’s	O
+relationship	O
+with	O
+the	O
+deep	O
+state	O
+.	O
+
+If	O
+you	O
+enjoyed	O
+Hillary	O
+Clinton	O
+’s	O
+tenure	O
+as	O
+Secretary	O
+of	O
+State	O
+,	O
+you	O
+’ll	O
+like	O
+Pompeo	O
+’s	O
+.	O
+
+Like	O
+Clinton	O
+and	O
+her	O
+Democrat	O
+allies	O
+,	O
+Pompeo	O
+has	O
+long	O
+subscribed	O
+to	O
+the	O
+belief	O
+that	O
+Russia	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+perpetually	I-PROP
+meddling	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+U.S.	I-PROP
+affairs	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+In	O
+fact	O
+,	O
+he	O
+believes	O
+Barack	O
+Obama	O
+got	O
+Russian	O
+help	O
+too	O
+.	O
+
+While	O
+he	O
+was	O
+being	O
+confirmed	O
+as	O
+CIA	O
+chief	O
+,	O
+the	O
+former	O
+lawmaker	O
+lashed	B-PROP
+out	I-PROP
+at	O
+Russia	O
+for	O
+reasserting	O
+”	O
+itself	O
+aggressively	O
+,	O
+invading	O
+and	O
+occupying	O
+Ukraine	O
+,	O
+threatening	O
+Europe	O
+,	O
+and	O
+doing	O
+nearly	O
+nothing	O
+to	O
+aid	O
+in	O
+the	O
+destruction	O
+and	O
+defeat	O
+of	O
+ISIS	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Again	O
+,	O
+if	O
+you	O
+liked	O
+Obama	B-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+era	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+world	B-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+on	I-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+fire	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+Russians	I-PROP
+everywhere	I-PROP
+State	I-PROP
+Department	I-PROP
+shenanigans	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+this	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+your	I-PROP
+guy	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Pompeo	O
+also	O
+is	B-PROP
+n’t	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+huge	I-PROP
+fan	O
+of	O
+calling	O
+the	O
+federal	O
+government	O
+out	O
+when	O
+it	O
+is	O
+clearly	O
+violating	O
+the	O
+rights	O
+of	O
+Americans	B-PROP
+,	O
+as	O
+shown	O
+by	O
+his	O
+statements	O
+last	O
+year	O
+regarding	O
+WikiLeaks	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+It	O
+is	O
+time	O
+to	O
+call	O
+out	O
+WikiLeaks	O
+for	O
+what	O
+it	O
+really	O
+is	O
+–	O
+a	B-PROP
+non	I-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+state	I-PROP
+hostile	I-PROP
+intelligence	I-PROP
+service	I-PROP
+often	O
+abetted	O
+by	O
+state	O
+actors	O
+like	O
+Russia	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+January	O
+of	O
+this	O
+year	O
+,	O
+our	O
+Intelligence	O
+Community	O
+determined	O
+that	O
+Russian	O
+military	O
+intelligence	O
+—	O
+the	O
+GRU	O
+—	O
+had	O
+used	O
+WikiLeaks	O
+to	O
+release	O
+data	O
+of	O
+U.S.	O
+victims	O
+that	O
+the	O
+GRU	O
+had	O
+obtained	O
+through	O
+cyber	O
+operations	O
+against	O
+the	O
+Democratic	O
+National	O
+Committee	O
+.	O
+
+And	O
+the	O
+report	O
+also	O
+found	O
+that	O
+Russia	O
+’s	O
+primary	O
+propaganda	O
+outlet	O
+,	O
+RT	O
+,	O
+has	O
+actively	O
+collaborated	O
+with	O
+WikiLeaks	O
+,	O
+”	O
+he	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+Pompeo	O
+favors	O
+increased	O
+U.S.	O
+involvement	O
+in	O
+Syria	O
+(	O
+hello	O
+,	O
+Russian	O
+proxy	O
+war	O
+)	O
+,	O
+ratcheting	O
+pressure	O
+on	O
+Iran	O
+and	O
+regime	O
+change	O
+in	O
+North	O
+Korea	O
+.	O
+
+Clinton	O
+City	O
+…	O
+
+Moving	O
+on	O
+to	O
+Haspel	O
+,	O
+who	O
+will	O
+now	O
+be	O
+heading	O
+the	O
+CIA	O
+,	O
+nothing	O
+’s	O
+looking	O
+any	O
+brighter	O
+.	O
+
+She	B-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+big	I-PROP
+fan	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+torture	I-PROP
+,	O
+according	O
+to	O
+a	O
+2013	O
+Washington	O
+Post	O
+article	O
+pointed	O
+out	O
+this	O
+morning	O
+by	O
+The	O
+Intercept	O
+:	O
+
+IN	O
+MAY	O
+2013	O
+,	O
+the	O
+Washington	O
+Post	O
+’s	O
+Greg	O
+Miller	O
+reported	O
+that	O
+the	O
+head	O
+of	O
+the	O
+CIA	O
+’s	O
+clandestine	O
+service	O
+was	O
+being	O
+shifted	O
+out	O
+of	O
+that	O
+position	O
+as	O
+a	O
+result	O
+of	O
+“	O
+a	O
+management	O
+shake	O
+-	O
+up	O
+”	O
+by	O
+then	O
+-	O
+Director	O
+John	O
+Brennan	O
+.	O
+
+As	O
+Miller	O
+documented	O
+,	O
+this	O
+official	O
+—	O
+whom	O
+the	O
+paper	O
+did	O
+not	O
+name	O
+because	O
+she	O
+was	O
+a	O
+covert	O
+agent	O
+at	O
+the	O
+time	O
+—	O
+was	O
+centrally	O
+involved	O
+in	O
+the	O
+worst	O
+abuses	O
+of	O
+the	O
+CIA	O
+’s	O
+Bush	O
+-	O
+era	O
+torture	O
+regime	O
+.	O
+
+As	O
+Miller	O
+put	O
+it	O
+,	O
+she	O
+was	O
+“	O
+directly	O
+involved	O
+in	O
+its	O
+controversial	O
+interrogation	O
+program	O
+”	O
+and	O
+had	O
+an	O
+“	O
+extensive	O
+role	O
+”	O
+in	O
+torturing	O
+detainees	O
+.	O
+
+Even	O
+more	O
+troubling	O
+,	O
+she	O
+“	O
+had	O
+run	O
+a	O
+secret	O
+prison	O
+in	O
+Thailand	O
+”	O
+—	O
+part	O
+of	O
+the	O
+CIA	O
+’s	O
+network	O
+of	O
+“	O
+black	O
+sites	O
+”	O
+—	O
+“	O
+where	O
+two	O
+detainees	O
+were	O
+subjected	O
+to	O
+waterboarding	O
+and	O
+other	O
+harsh	B-PROP
+techniques	O
+.	O
+”	O
+The	O
+Senate	O
+Intelligence	O
+Committee	O
+’s	O
+report	O
+on	O
+torture	O
+also	O
+detailed	O
+the	O
+central	O
+role	O
+she	O
+played	O
+in	O
+the	O
+particularly	O
+gruesome	B-PROP
+torture	I-PROP
+of	O
+detainee	O
+Abu	O
+Zubaydah	O
+.	O
+
+Beyond	O
+all	O
+that	O
+,	O
+she	O
+played	O
+a	O
+vital	O
+role	O
+in	O
+the	O
+destruction	O
+of	O
+interrogation	O
+videotapes	O
+that	O
+showed	O
+the	O
+torture	B-PROP
+of	O
+detainees	O
+both	O
+at	O
+the	O
+black	O
+site	O
+she	O
+ran	O
+and	O
+other	O
+secret	O
+agency	O
+locations	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+concealment	O
+of	O
+those	O
+interrogation	O
+tapes	O
+,	O
+which	O
+violated	O
+multiple	O
+court	O
+orders	O
+as	O
+well	O
+as	O
+the	O
+demands	O
+of	O
+the	O
+9/11	O
+commission	O
+and	O
+the	O
+advice	O
+of	O
+White	O
+House	O
+lawyers	O
+,	O
+was	O
+condemned	O
+as	O
+“	O
+obstruction	O
+”	O
+by	O
+commission	O
+chairs	O
+Lee	O
+Hamilton	O
+and	O
+Thomas	O
+Keane	O
+.	O
+
+A	O
+special	O
+prosecutor	O
+and	O
+grand	O
+jury	O
+investigated	O
+those	O
+actions	O
+but	O
+ultimately	O
+chose	O
+not	O
+to	O
+prosecute	O
+.	O
+
+Bottom	O
+line	O
+,	O
+George	O
+W.	O
+Bush	O
+/	O
+Barack	O
+Obama	O
+era	O
+foreign	O
+policy	O
+and	O
+intelligence	O
+doctrines	O
+are	O
+n’t	O
+going	O
+anywhere	O
+under	O
+Trump	O
+.	O
+
+Yikes	B-PROP
+!	I-PROP
+
+Even	O
+John	O
+McCain	O
+is	O
+worried	O
+about	O
+Trump	O
+’s	O
+CIA	O
+pick	O
+
+Personal	O
+Liberty	O
+Poll	O
+Exercise	O
+your	O
+right	O
+to	O
+vote	O
+.	O
+
+After	O
+President	O
+Donald	O
+Trump	O
+nominated	O
+Gina	O
+Haspel	O
+to	O
+head	O
+the	O
+Central	O
+Intelligence	O
+Agency	O
+Tuesday	O
+,	O
+Sen.	O
+John	O
+McCain	O
+(	O
+R	O
+-	O
+Ariz	O
+.	O
+)	O
+said	O
+Americans	O
+need	O
+answers	O
+about	O
+her	O
+past	O
+involvement	O
+in	O
+state	O
+sponsored	O
+torture	O
+programs	O
+.	O
+
+As	O
+I	O
+noted	O
+earlier	O
+today	O
+,	O
+Haspel	O
+’s	O
+long	O
+career	O
+at	O
+the	O
+CIA	O
+spanned	O
+the	O
+years	O
+of	O
+torture	B-PROP
+carried	O
+out	O
+under	O
+the	O
+George	O
+W.	O
+Bush	O
+White	O
+House	O
+.	O
+
+A	O
+2013	O
+Washington	O
+Post	O
+report	O
+on	O
+the	O
+new	O
+CIA	O
+head	O
+called	O
+her	O
+role	O
+in	O
+the	O
+torture	O
+programs	O
+of	O
+that	O
+era	O
+“	O
+extensive	O
+”	O
+and	O
+noted	O
+that	O
+at	O
+one	O
+point	O
+she	O
+ran	O
+a	O
+CIA	O
+“	O
+black	O
+site	O
+”	O
+in	O
+Thailand	O
+where	O
+torture	O
+occurred	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+a	O
+lengthy	O
+statement	O
+following	O
+Haspel	O
+’s	O
+nomination	O
+,	O
+McCain	O
+expressed	O
+big	O
+concerns	O
+about	O
+what	O
+it	O
+means	O
+for	O
+the	O
+agency	O
+’s	O
+future	O
+,	O
+saying	O
+:	O
+
+During	O
+his	O
+own	O
+confirmation	O
+proceedings	O
+for	O
+Director	O
+of	O
+the	O
+CIA	O
+,	O
+Mike	O
+Pompeo	O
+repeatedly	O
+committed	O
+that	O
+he	O
+would	O
+comply	O
+with	O
+the	O
+law	O
+that	O
+applies	O
+the	O
+Army	O
+Field	O
+Manual	O
+’s	O
+interrogation	O
+requirements	O
+to	O
+all	O
+U.S.	O
+agencies	O
+,	O
+including	O
+the	O
+CIA	O
+.	O
+
+The	B-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+now	O
+deserve	O
+the	O
+same	O
+assurances	O
+from	O
+Gina	O
+Haspel	O
+,	O
+whose	O
+career	O
+with	O
+the	O
+agency	O
+has	O
+intersected	O
+with	O
+the	O
+program	O
+of	O
+so	O
+-	O
+called	O
+‘	O
+enhanced	O
+interrogation	O
+techniques	O
+’	O
+on	O
+a	O
+number	O
+of	O
+occasions	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+torture	B-PROP
+of	O
+detainees	O
+in	O
+U.S.	O
+custody	O
+during	O
+the	O
+last	O
+decade	O
+was	O
+one	B-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+darkest	I-PROP
+chapters	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+history	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Ms.	O
+Haspel	O
+needs	O
+to	O
+explain	O
+the	O
+nature	O
+and	O
+extent	O
+of	O
+her	O
+involvement	O
+in	O
+the	O
+CIA	O
+’s	O
+interrogation	O
+program	O
+during	O
+the	O
+confirmation	O
+process	O
+.	O
+
+I	O
+know	O
+the	O
+Senate	O
+will	O
+do	O
+its	O
+job	O
+in	O
+examining	O
+Ms.	O
+Haspel	O
+’s	O
+record	O
+as	O
+well	O
+as	O
+her	O
+beliefs	O
+about	O
+torture	O
+and	O
+her	O
+approach	O
+to	O
+current	O
+law	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+the	O
+aftermath	O
+of	O
+the	O
+September	O
+11th	O
+attacks	O
+,	O
+our	B-PROP
+government	I-PROP
+squandered	B-PROP
+precious	I-PROP
+moral	I-PROP
+authority	I-PROP
+in	O
+a	O
+futile	B-PROP
+effort	I-PROP
+to	O
+produce	O
+intelligence	O
+by	O
+means	O
+of	O
+torture	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+are	O
+still	O
+dealing	O
+with	O
+the	O
+consequences	O
+of	O
+that	O
+desperately	B-PROP
+misguided	I-PROP
+decision	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Current	O
+U.S.	O
+law	O
+is	O
+clear	O
+in	O
+banning	O
+enhanced	O
+interrogation	O
+techniques	O
+.	O
+
+Any	O
+nominee	O
+for	O
+Director	O
+of	O
+the	O
+CIA	O
+must	O
+pledge	O
+without	O
+reservation	O
+to	O
+uphold	O
+this	O
+prohibition	O
+,	O
+which	O
+has	O
+helped	O
+us	O
+to	O
+regain	O
+our	O
+position	O
+of	O
+leadership	O
+in	O
+the	O
+struggle	O
+for	O
+universal	O
+human	O
+rights	O
+—	O
+the	B-PROP
+struggle	I-PROP
+upon	I-PROP
+which	I-PROP
+this	I-PROP
+country	I-PROP
+was	I-PROP
+founded	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+which	I-PROP
+remains	I-PROP
+its	I-PROP
+highest	I-PROP
+aspiration	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Americans	B-PROP
+who	I-PROP
+value	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+Constitution	I-PROP
+should	O
+take	O
+this	O
+rare	O
+moment	O
+to	O
+agree	O
+with	O
+McCain	O
+.	O
+
+From	B-PROP
+Bad	I-PROP
+To	I-PROP
+Worse	I-PROP
+?	O
+
+Tillerson	O
+Out	O
+–	O
+CIA	O
+Director	O
+Pompeo	O
+In	O
+At	O
+State	O
+Dept	O
+–	O
+Gina	O
+Haspel	O
+As	O
+Head	O
+Of	O
+CIA	O
+
+From	B-PROP
+Bad	I-PROP
+To	I-PROP
+Worse	I-PROP
+?	O
+
+Tillerson	O
+Out	O
+–	O
+CIA	O
+Director	O
+Pompeo	O
+In	O
+At	O
+State	O
+Dept	O
+–	O
+Gina	O
+Haspel	O
+As	O
+Head	O
+Of	O
+CIA	O
+
+Please	O
+help	O
+support	O
+us	O
+with	O
+cryptocurrency	O
+donations	O
+.	O
+
+Thank	O
+you	O
+!	O
+
+Keeping	O
+things	O
+moving	O
+,	O
+and	O
+I	O
+think	O
+a	O
+lot	O
+of	O
+us	O
+can	O
+just	O
+shout	O
+out	O
+,	O
+“	O
+What	B-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+you	I-PROP
+thinking	I-PROP
+?	I-PROP
+”	I-PROP
+as	O
+President	O
+Donald	O
+Trump	O
+brings	O
+CIA	O
+Director	O
+Mike	O
+Pompeo	O
+,	O
+a	O
+man	O
+that	O
+blasted	B-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+likes	O
+of	O
+Edward	O
+Snowden	O
+for	O
+revealing	O
+the	O
+crimes	O
+of	O
+our	O
+government	O
+,	O
+to	O
+the	O
+State	O
+Department	O
+and	O
+installs	O
+Gina	O
+Haspel	O
+in	O
+the	O
+position	O
+of	O
+head	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Central	O
+Intelligence	O
+Agency	O
+.	O
+
+Trump	O
+tweeted	O
+out	O
+the	O
+news	O
+on	O
+Tuesday	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Mike	O
+Pompeo	O
+,	O
+Director	O
+of	O
+the	O
+CIA	O
+,	O
+will	O
+become	O
+our	O
+new	O
+Secretary	O
+of	O
+State	O
+.	O
+
+He	B-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+fantastic	I-PROP
+job	I-PROP
+!	O
+
+Thank	O
+you	O
+to	O
+Rex	O
+Tillerson	O
+for	O
+his	O
+service	O
+!	O
+
+Gina	O
+Haspel	O
+will	O
+become	O
+the	O
+new	O
+Director	O
+of	O
+the	O
+CIA	O
+,	O
+and	O
+the	O
+first	O
+woman	O
+so	O
+chosen	O
+.	O
+
+Congratulations	B-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+all	I-PROP
+!	O
+”	O
+he	O
+tweeted	O
+.	O
+
+Mike	O
+Pompeo	O
+,	O
+Director	O
+of	O
+the	O
+CIA	O
+,	O
+will	O
+become	O
+our	O
+new	O
+Secretary	O
+of	O
+State	O
+.	O
+
+He	B-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+fantastic	I-PROP
+job	I-PROP
+!	O
+
+Thank	O
+you	O
+to	O
+Rex	O
+Tillerson	O
+for	O
+his	O
+service	O
+!	O
+
+Gina	O
+Haspel	O
+will	O
+become	O
+the	O
+new	O
+Director	O
+of	O
+the	O
+CIA	O
+,	O
+and	O
+the	O
+first	O
+woman	O
+so	O
+chosen	O
+.	O
+
+Congratulations	O
+to	O
+all	O
+!	O
+
+—	O
+Donald	O
+J.	O
+Trump	O
+(	O
+@realDonaldTrump	O
+)	O
+March	O
+13	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+The	O
+Washington	O
+Post	O
+first	O
+reported	O
+on	O
+the	O
+story	O
+prior	O
+to	O
+Trump	O
+’s	O
+tweet	O
+.	O
+
+Trump	O
+and	O
+Tillerson	O
+have	O
+had	O
+a	O
+fraught	B-PROP
+relationship	O
+for	O
+many	O
+months	O
+.	O
+
+Trump	O
+told	O
+reporters	O
+Tuesday	O
+that	O
+he	O
+ultimately	O
+decided	O
+to	O
+fire	O
+the	O
+secretary	O
+because	O
+they	O
+disagreed	O
+over	O
+strategy	O
+in	O
+key	O
+areas	O
+of	O
+foreign	O
+policy	O
+,	O
+such	O
+as	O
+the	O
+2015	O
+Iran	O
+nuclear	O
+deal	O
+,	O
+the	O
+approach	O
+to	O
+North	O
+Korea	O
+and	O
+the	O
+overall	O
+tone	O
+of	O
+U.S.	O
+diplomacy	O
+.	O
+
+Tillerson	O
+said	O
+he	O
+received	O
+a	O
+call	O
+from	O
+Trump	O
+around	O
+noon	O
+Tuesday	O
+,	O
+more	O
+than	O
+three	O
+hours	O
+after	O
+his	O
+firing	O
+was	O
+first	O
+reported	O
+by	O
+The	O
+Washington	O
+Post	O
+and	O
+announced	O
+minutes	O
+later	O
+in	O
+a	O
+tweet	O
+from	O
+the	O
+president	O
+.	O
+
+His	O
+voice	O
+quivering	O
+,	O
+Tillerson	O
+thanked	O
+career	O
+diplomats	O
+for	O
+their	O
+“	O
+honesty	O
+and	O
+integrity	O
+”	O
+and	O
+the	O
+American	O
+people	O
+for	O
+“	O
+acts	O
+of	O
+kindness	O
+,	O
+”	O
+and	O
+he	O
+singled	O
+out	O
+Defense	O
+Secretary	O
+Jim	O
+Mattis	O
+for	O
+their	O
+partnership	O
+and	O
+mutual	O
+support	O
+of	O
+diplomacy	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+he	O
+notably	O
+did	O
+not	O
+thank	O
+Trump	O
+or	O
+praise	O
+his	O
+policies	O
+.	O
+
+Tillerson	O
+said	O
+he	O
+will	O
+remain	O
+in	O
+his	O
+post	O
+until	O
+March	O
+31	O
+but	O
+is	O
+delegating	O
+all	O
+authorities	O
+for	O
+running	O
+the	O
+State	O
+Department	O
+to	O
+Deputy	O
+Secretary	O
+John	O
+Sullivan	O
+and	O
+is	O
+committed	O
+to	O
+ensuring	O
+“	O
+an	O
+orderly	O
+and	O
+smooth	O
+transition	O
+.	O
+”	O
+The	O
+deposed	O
+diplomat	O
+also	O
+made	O
+a	O
+clear	O
+statement	O
+about	O
+Russian	O
+aggression	O
+:	O
+“	O
+Much	O
+work	O
+remains	O
+to	O
+respond	O
+to	O
+the	O
+troubling	B-PROP
+behavior	O
+and	O
+actions	O
+on	O
+the	O
+part	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Russian	O
+government	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+CNBC	O
+reports	O
+that	O
+Tillerson	O
+was	O
+not	O
+the	O
+only	O
+firing	O
+that	O
+took	O
+place	O
+on	O
+Tuesday	O
+:	O
+
+On	O
+Tuesday	O
+morning	O
+,	O
+State	O
+Department	O
+spokesman	O
+Steve	O
+Goldstein	O
+said	O
+Tillerson	O
+had	O
+no	O
+plans	O
+to	O
+leave	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+“	O
+did	O
+not	O
+speak	O
+to	O
+the	O
+president	O
+this	O
+morning	O
+and	O
+is	O
+unaware	O
+of	O
+the	O
+reason	O
+”	O
+for	O
+his	O
+firing	O
+,	O
+the	O
+spokesman	O
+added	O
+.	O
+
+Two	O
+White	O
+House	O
+officials	O
+told	O
+the	O
+Associated	O
+Press	O
+that	O
+Tillerson	O
+found	O
+out	O
+he	O
+was	O
+fired	O
+Friday	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+secretary	O
+got	O
+a	O
+call	O
+from	O
+White	O
+House	O
+chief	O
+of	O
+staff	O
+John	O
+Kelly	O
+but	O
+only	O
+got	O
+told	O
+an	O
+unspecified	O
+presidential	O
+tweet	O
+concerning	O
+him	O
+may	O
+be	O
+coming	O
+,	O
+officials	O
+at	O
+the	O
+State	O
+Department	O
+told	O
+the	O
+wire	O
+service	O
+.	O
+
+Later	O
+,	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+fired	O
+Goldstein	O
+,	O
+who	O
+contradicted	O
+the	O
+administration	O
+’s	O
+account	O
+of	O
+Tillerson	O
+’s	O
+ouster	O
+,	O
+according	O
+to	O
+NBC	O
+News	O
+and	O
+the	O
+AP	O
+.	O
+
+Goldstein	O
+was	O
+the	O
+under	O
+secretary	O
+of	O
+state	O
+for	O
+public	O
+diplomacy	O
+and	O
+public	O
+affairs	O
+.	O
+
+Trump	O
+later	O
+told	O
+reporters	O
+he	O
+disagreed	O
+with	O
+Tillerson	O
+on	O
+some	O
+issues	O
+and	O
+feels	O
+the	O
+diplomat	O
+“	O
+will	O
+be	O
+much	O
+happier	O
+now	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+While	O
+many	O
+are	O
+happy	O
+that	O
+Tillerson	O
+is	O
+gone	O
+,	O
+many	O
+of	O
+us	O
+are	O
+concerned	O
+with	O
+Mike	O
+Pompeo	O
+being	O
+installed	O
+at	O
+Secretary	O
+of	O
+State	O
+,	O
+especially	O
+regarding	O
+his	O
+un	B-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+comments	I-PROP
+against	O
+NSA	B-PROP
+whistleblower	I-PROP
+Edward	O
+Snowden	O
+,	O
+who	O
+exposed	B-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+criminal	I-PROP
+activity	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+Deep	I-PROP
+State	I-PROP
+in	O
+DC	O
+.	O
+
+Speaking	O
+of	O
+Snowden	O
+,	O
+he	O
+decided	O
+to	O
+chime	O
+in	O
+on	O
+the	O
+newly	O
+appointed	O
+CIA	O
+director	O
+,	O
+but	O
+did	O
+not	O
+say	O
+anything	O
+about	O
+Pompeo	O
+becoming	O
+Secretary	O
+of	O
+State	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+The	O
+new	O
+CIA	O
+director	O
+was	O
+a	O
+key	O
+part	O
+of	O
+the	O
+torture	B-PROP
+program	O
+and	O
+its	O
+illegal	O
+cover	O
+-	O
+up	O
+.	O
+
+Her	O
+name	O
+was	O
+on	O
+the	O
+Top	O
+Secret	O
+order	O
+demanding	O
+the	O
+destruction	O
+of	O
+tapes	O
+to	O
+prevent	O
+them	O
+being	O
+seen	O
+by	O
+Congress	O
+.	O
+
+Incredible	B-PROP
+.	O
+”	O
+Snowden	O
+tweeted	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+new	O
+CIA	O
+director	O
+was	O
+a	O
+key	O
+part	O
+of	O
+the	O
+torture	B-PROP
+program	O
+and	O
+its	O
+illegal	O
+cover	O
+-	O
+up	O
+.	O
+
+Her	O
+name	O
+was	O
+on	O
+the	O
+Top	O
+Secret	O
+order	O
+demanding	O
+the	O
+destruction	O
+of	O
+tapes	O
+to	O
+prevent	O
+them	O
+being	O
+seen	O
+by	O
+Congress	O
+.	O
+
+Incredible	B-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+https://t.co/HjVHCPCbpo	O
+https://t.co/VamIGa1A8w	O
+—	O
+Edward	O
+Snowden	O
+(	O
+@Snowden	O
+)	O
+March	O
+13	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+“	O
+Interesting	O
+:	O
+The	O
+new	O
+CIA	O
+Director	O
+Haspel	O
+,	O
+who	O
+‘	O
+tortured	B-PROP
+some	I-PROP
+folks	I-PROP
+,	O
+’	O
+probably	O
+ca	O
+n’t	O
+travel	O
+to	O
+the	O
+EU	O
+to	O
+meet	O
+other	O
+spy	B-PROP
+chiefs	I-PROP
+without	O
+facing	O
+arrest	O
+due	O
+to	O
+an	O
+@ECCHRBerlin	O
+complaint	O
+to	O
+Germany	O
+’s	O
+federal	O
+prosecutor	O
+,	O
+”	O
+tweeted	O
+Snowden	O
+.	O
+
+Interesting	O
+:	O
+The	O
+new	O
+CIA	O
+Director	O
+Haspel	O
+,	O
+who	O
+"	O
+tortured	B-PROP
+some	I-PROP
+folks	I-PROP
+,	O
+"	O
+probably	O
+ca	O
+n't	O
+travel	O
+to	O
+the	O
+EU	O
+to	O
+meet	O
+other	O
+spy	B-PROP
+chiefs	I-PROP
+without	O
+facing	O
+arrest	O
+due	O
+to	O
+an	O
+@ECCHRBerlin	O
+complaint	O
+to	O
+Germany	O
+'s	O
+federal	O
+prosecutor	O
+.	O
+
+Details	O
+:	O
+https://t.co/7q4euQKtm7	O
+—	O
+Edward	O
+Snowden	O
+(	O
+@Snowden	O
+)	O
+March	O
+13	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+Snowden	O
+then	O
+asked	O
+,	O
+“	O
+Are	B-PROP
+these	I-PROP
+really	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+values	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+US	I-PROP
+should	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+promoting	I-PROP
+?	I-PROP
+
+The	O
+CIA	O
+might	O
+as	O
+well	O
+start	O
+issuing	O
+uniforms	O
+decorated	O
+with	O
+skulls	O
+and	O
+lightning	O
+bolts	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Are	B-PROP
+these	I-PROP
+really	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+values	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+US	I-PROP
+should	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+promoting	I-PROP
+?	I-PROP
+
+The	O
+CIA	O
+might	O
+as	O
+well	O
+start	O
+issuing	O
+uniforms	O
+decorated	O
+with	O
+skulls	O
+and	O
+lightning	O
+bolts	O
+.	O
+
+https://t.co/ZIeHWP57l3	O
+—	O
+Edward	O
+Snowden	O
+(	O
+@Snowden	O
+)	O
+March	O
+13	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+Snowden	O
+then	O
+offered	O
+a	O
+piece	O
+from	O
+The	O
+Intercept	O
+and	O
+The	O
+New	O
+Yorker	O
+for	O
+those	O
+who	O
+want	O
+to	O
+know	O
+a	O
+bit	O
+more	O
+about	O
+Gina	O
+Haspel	O
+.	O
+
+Want	O
+to	O
+know	O
+more	O
+about	O
+Gina	O
+Haspel	O
+?	O
+
+1	O
+)	O
+https://t.co/7nTSnPYDbZ	O
+
+2	O
+)	O
+https://t.co/Rg6nMJBxch	O
+—	O
+Edward	O
+Snowden	O
+(	O
+@Snowden	O
+)	O
+March	O
+13	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+Glenn	O
+Greenwald	O
+,	O
+author	O
+of	O
+the	O
+above	O
+piece	O
+at	O
+The	O
+Intercept	O
+wrote	O
+,	O
+“	O
+Haspel	O
+,	O
+who	O
+will	O
+be	O
+the	O
+first	O
+woman	O
+to	O
+lead	O
+CIA	O
+,	O
+did	O
+n’t	O
+just	O
+oversee	O
+the	O
+Bush	O
+CIA	O
+’s	O
+black	O
+site	O
+but	O
+directly	O
+participated	O
+in	O
+the	O
+horrific	B-PROP
+torture	I-PROP
+of	O
+detainees	O
+.	O
+
+She	O
+also	O
+participated	O
+in	O
+the	O
+particularly	O
+gruesome	B-PROP
+torture	I-PROP
+of	O
+detainee	O
+Abu	O
+Zubaydah	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+“	O
+This	O
+is	O
+n’t	O
+a	O
+radical	O
+departure	O
+for	O
+CIA	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Greenwald	O
+added	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+After	O
+all	O
+,	O
+Haspel	O
+did	O
+this	O
+under	O
+George	O
+Tenet	O
+.	O
+
+At	O
+the	O
+time	O
+,	O
+John	O
+Brennan	O
+–	O
+who	O
+became	O
+Obama	O
+’s	O
+CIA	O
+director	O
+–	O
+was	O
+an	O
+advocate	O
+of	O
+rendition	O
+&	O
+other	O
+torture	O
+methods	O
+.	O
+
+And	O
+Pompeo	O
+was	O
+fine	O
+with	O
+black	O
+sites	O
+.	O
+
+Still	O
+notable	O
+:	O
+she	B-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+an	I-PROP
+actual	I-PROP
+torturer	I-PROP
+.	O
+”	O
+
+From	O
+Greenwald	O
+’s	O
+article	O
+:	O
+
+This	O
+is	O
+more	B-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+same	I-PROP
+old	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+same	I-PROP
+old	I-PROP
+going	O
+on	O
+,	O
+and	O
+it	B-PROP
+looks	I-PROP
+like	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+about	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+get	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+lot	I-PROP
+worse	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Article	O
+posted	O
+with	O
+permission	O
+from	O
+Sons	O
+Of	O
+Liberty	O
+Media	O
+
+Gina	O
+Haspel	O
+,	O
+New	O
+CIA	O
+Director	O
+
+President	O
+Donald	O
+Trump	O
+nominated	O
+Gina	O
+Haspel	O
+as	O
+the	O
+new	O
+director	O
+of	O
+the	O
+CIA	O
+,	O
+announcing	O
+the	O
+news	O
+on	O
+Twitter	O
+.	O
+
+Mike	O
+Pompeo	O
+,	O
+the	O
+previous	O
+director	O
+,	O
+was	O
+nominated	O
+to	O
+run	O
+the	O
+State	O
+Department	O
+to	O
+replace	O
+the	O
+ousted	O
+Rex	O
+Tillerson	O
+.	O
+
+*	O
+*	O
+*	O
+*	O
+*	O
+
+IN	O
+MAY	O
+2013	O
+,	O
+the	O
+Washington	O
+Post	O
+’s	O
+Greg	O
+Miller	O
+reported	O
+that	O
+the	O
+head	O
+of	O
+the	O
+CIA	O
+’s	O
+clandestine	O
+service	O
+was	O
+being	O
+shifted	O
+out	O
+of	O
+that	O
+position	O
+as	O
+a	O
+result	O
+of	O
+“	O
+a	O
+management	O
+shake	O
+-	O
+up	O
+”	O
+by	O
+then	O
+-	O
+Director	O
+John	O
+Brennan	O
+.	O
+
+As	O
+Miller	O
+documented	O
+,	O
+this	O
+official	O
+—	O
+whom	O
+the	O
+paper	O
+did	O
+not	O
+name	O
+because	O
+she	O
+was	O
+a	O
+covert	O
+agent	O
+at	O
+the	O
+time	O
+—	O
+was	O
+centrally	O
+involved	O
+in	O
+the	O
+worst	O
+abuses	O
+of	O
+the	O
+CIA	O
+’s	O
+Bush	O
+-	O
+era	O
+torture	O
+regime	O
+.	O
+
+As	O
+Miller	O
+put	O
+it	O
+,	O
+she	O
+was	O
+“	O
+directly	O
+involved	O
+in	O
+its	O
+controversial	O
+interrogation	O
+program	O
+”	O
+and	O
+had	O
+an	O
+“	O
+extensive	O
+role	O
+”	O
+in	O
+torturing	O
+detainees	O
+.	O
+
+Even	O
+more	O
+troubling	O
+,	O
+she	O
+“	O
+had	O
+run	O
+a	O
+secret	O
+prison	O
+in	O
+Thailand	O
+”	O
+—	O
+part	O
+of	O
+the	O
+CIA	O
+’s	O
+network	O
+of	O
+“	O
+black	O
+sites	O
+”	O
+—	O
+“	O
+where	O
+two	O
+detainees	O
+were	O
+subjected	O
+to	O
+waterboarding	O
+and	O
+other	O
+harsh	B-PROP
+techniques	O
+.	O
+”	O
+The	O
+Senate	O
+Intelligence	O
+Committee	O
+’s	O
+report	O
+on	O
+torture	O
+also	O
+detailed	O
+the	O
+central	O
+role	O
+she	O
+played	O
+in	O
+the	O
+particularly	O
+gruesome	B-PROP
+torture	I-PROP
+of	O
+detainee	O
+Abu	O
+Zubaydah	O
+.	O
+
+Beyond	O
+all	O
+that	O
+,	O
+she	O
+played	O
+a	O
+vital	O
+role	O
+in	O
+the	O
+destruction	O
+of	O
+interrogation	O
+videotapes	O
+that	O
+showed	O
+the	O
+torture	B-PROP
+of	O
+detainees	O
+both	O
+at	O
+the	O
+black	O
+site	O
+she	O
+ran	O
+and	O
+other	O
+secret	O
+agency	O
+locations	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+concealment	O
+of	O
+those	O
+interrogation	O
+tapes	O
+,	O
+which	O
+violated	O
+multiple	O
+court	O
+orders	O
+as	O
+well	O
+as	O
+the	O
+demands	O
+of	O
+the	O
+9/11	O
+commission	O
+and	O
+the	O
+advice	O
+of	O
+White	O
+House	O
+lawyers	O
+,	O
+was	O
+condemned	O
+as	O
+“	O
+obstruction	O
+”	O
+by	O
+commission	O
+chairs	O
+Lee	O
+Hamilton	O
+and	O
+Thomas	O
+Keane	O
+.	O
+
+A	O
+special	O
+prosecutor	O
+and	O
+grand	O
+jury	O
+investigated	O
+those	O
+actions	O
+but	O
+ultimately	O
+chose	O
+not	O
+to	O
+prosecute	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+name	O
+of	O
+that	O
+CIA	O
+official	O
+whose	O
+torture	B-PROP
+activities	O
+the	O
+Post	O
+described	O
+is	O
+Gina	O
+Haspel	O
+.	O
+
+Today	O
+,	O
+as	O
+BuzzFeed	O
+’s	O
+Jason	O
+Leopold	O
+noted	O
+,	O
+CIA	O
+Director	O
+Mike	O
+Pompeo	O
+announced	O
+that	O
+Haspel	O
+was	O
+selected	O
+by	O
+Trump	O
+to	O
+be	O
+deputy	O
+director	O
+of	O
+the	O
+CIA	O
+.	O
+
+Read	O
+the	O
+Whole	O
+Article	O
+
+Rand	O
+Paul	O
+says	O
+he	O
+’ll	O
+oppose	O
+Trump	O
+’s	O
+CIA	O
+,	O
+State	O
+Department	O
+nominees	O
+
+Personal	O
+Liberty	O
+Poll	O
+Exercise	O
+your	O
+right	O
+to	O
+vote	O
+.	O
+
+Sen.	O
+Rand	O
+Paul	O
+(	O
+R	O
+-	O
+Ky	O
+.	O
+)	O
+says	O
+he	O
+plans	O
+to	O
+do	O
+everything	O
+in	O
+his	O
+power	O
+to	O
+block	O
+President	O
+Donald	O
+Trump	O
+’s	O
+nominations	O
+to	O
+head	O
+the	O
+State	O
+Department	O
+and	O
+Central	O
+Intelligence	O
+Agency	O
+over	O
+war	O
+and	O
+torture	O
+concerns	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+told	O
+you	O
+about	O
+Trump	O
+’s	O
+administration	O
+shake	O
+-	O
+ups	O
+and	O
+new	O
+nominees	O
+Tuesday	O
+:	O
+
+Following	O
+what	O
+has	O
+appeared	O
+for	O
+months	O
+to	O
+be	O
+a	O
+strained	O
+relationship	O
+between	O
+President	O
+Donald	O
+Trump	O
+and	O
+Secretary	O
+of	O
+State	O
+Rex	O
+Tillerson	O
+,	O
+the	O
+top	O
+diplomat	O
+is	O
+being	O
+replaced	O
+.	O
+
+Trump	O
+announced	O
+Tillerson	O
+’s	O
+ouster	O
+via	O
+Twitter	O
+Tuesday	O
+,	O
+saying	O
+:	O
+“	O
+Mike	O
+Pompeo	O
+,	O
+Director	O
+of	O
+the	O
+CIA	O
+,	O
+will	O
+become	O
+our	O
+new	O
+Secretary	O
+of	O
+State	O
+.	O
+
+He	B-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+fantastic	I-PROP
+job	I-PROP
+!	O
+
+Thank	O
+you	O
+to	O
+Rex	O
+Tillerson	O
+for	O
+his	O
+service	O
+!	O
+
+Gina	O
+Haspel	O
+will	O
+become	O
+the	O
+new	O
+Director	O
+of	O
+the	O
+CIA	O
+,	O
+and	O
+the	O
+first	O
+woman	O
+so	O
+chosen	O
+.	O
+
+Congratulations	O
+to	O
+all	O
+!	O
+”	O
+This	O
+is	O
+yet	O
+another	O
+big	O
+shake	O
+-	O
+up	O
+for	O
+Trump	O
+’s	O
+still	O
+-	O
+young	O
+administration	O
+—	O
+and	O
+it	O
+may	O
+be	O
+the	O
+most	O
+important	O
+one	O
+to	O
+date	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+move	O
+creates	O
+some	O
+big	O
+questions	O
+about	O
+both	O
+the	O
+administration	O
+’s	O
+foreign	O
+policy	O
+ambitions	O
+as	O
+well	O
+as	O
+the	O
+president	O
+’s	O
+relationship	O
+with	O
+the	O
+deep	O
+state	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+I	O
+will	O
+oppose	O
+both	O
+Pompeo	O
+’s	O
+nomination	O
+and	O
+Haspel	O
+’s	O
+nomination	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Paul	O
+said	O
+Wednesday	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Kentucky	O
+lawmaker	O
+is	O
+the	O
+first	O
+Republican	O
+to	O
+say	O
+he	O
+will	O
+attempt	O
+to	O
+block	O
+the	O
+nominees	O
+;	O
+but	O
+he	O
+is	O
+n’t	O
+the	O
+first	O
+Republican	O
+to	O
+express	O
+concern	O
+.	O
+
+Sen.	O
+John	O
+McCain	O
+of	O
+Arizona	O
+said	O
+Tuesday	O
+that	O
+he	O
+wanted	O
+answers	O
+about	O
+Haspel	O
+’s	O
+background	O
+running	O
+CIA	O
+torture	O
+programs	O
+prior	O
+to	O
+her	O
+confirmation	O
+.	O
+
+Paul	O
+contends	O
+that	O
+the	O
+Trump	O
+nominations	O
+directly	O
+contradict	O
+promises	O
+the	O
+president	O
+made	O
+on	O
+the	O
+campaign	O
+trail	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+I	B-PROP
+’m	I-PROP
+perplexed	I-PROP
+by	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+nomination	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+who	I-PROP
+love	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+Iraq	I-PROP
+War	I-PROP
+so	I-PROP
+much	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+would	I-PROP
+advocate	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+war	I-PROP
+with	I-PROP
+Iran	I-PROP
+next	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+I	O
+think	O
+it	O
+goes	O
+against	O
+most	O
+of	O
+the	O
+things	O
+President	O
+Trump	O
+campaigned	O
+on	O
+,	O
+”	O
+he	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+lawmaker	O
+added	O
+that	O
+he	O
+ca	O
+n’t	O
+support	O
+Haspel	O
+,	O
+whom	O
+he	O
+described	O
+as	O
+having	O
+expressed	O
+“	O
+joyful	B-PROP
+glee	I-PROP
+”	I-PROP
+at	O
+being	O
+involved	O
+in	O
+torture	O
+programs	O
+in	O
+the	O
+past	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+I	O
+find	O
+it	O
+just	B-PROP
+amazing	I-PROP
+that	O
+anyone	O
+would	O
+consider	O
+having	O
+this	O
+woman	O
+at	O
+the	O
+head	O
+of	O
+the	O
+CIA	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Paul	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+With	O
+Paul	O
+’s	O
+defection	O
+and	O
+McCain	O
+likely	O
+to	O
+be	O
+undergoing	O
+treatment	O
+for	O
+brain	O
+cancer	O
+at	O
+the	O
+time	O
+of	O
+the	O
+vote	O
+,	O
+Trump	O
+’s	O
+White	O
+House	O
+will	O
+likely	O
+be	O
+left	O
+scurrying	O
+for	O
+Democrat	O
+support	O
+to	O
+secure	O
+the	O
+majority	O
+necessary	O
+for	O
+the	O
+nominees	O
+to	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+in	O
+the	O
+Senate	O
+.	O
+
+Rand	O
+Paul	O
+:	O
+I	O
+'ll	O
+Do	O
+"	O
+Whatever	O
+It	O
+Takes	O
+"	O
+To	O
+Block	O
+Haspel	O
+&	O
+Pompeo	O
+
+Senator	O
+Rand	O
+Paul	O
+(	O
+R	O
+-	O
+KY	O
+)	O
+has	O
+expressed	O
+some	O
+of	O
+my	O
+thoughts	O
+when	O
+it	O
+comes	O
+to	O
+the	O
+newly	O
+nominated	O
+Secretary	O
+of	O
+State	O
+and	O
+director	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Central	O
+Intelligence	O
+Agency	O
+.	O
+
+Paul	O
+told	O
+CNN	O
+’s	O
+“	O
+State	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Union	O
+”	O
+and	O
+CBS	O
+News	O
+’	O
+“	O
+Face	O
+the	O
+Nation	O
+”	O
+on	O
+Sunday	O
+that	O
+he	O
+would	O
+do	O
+"	O
+whatever	O
+it	O
+takes	O
+,	O
+"	O
+including	O
+a	O
+filibuster	O
+,	O
+to	O
+block	O
+the	O
+confirmations	O
+of	O
+Mike	O
+Pompeo	O
+to	O
+head	O
+the	O
+State	O
+Department	O
+and	O
+Gina	O
+Haspel	O
+to	O
+run	O
+the	O
+CIA	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+You	O
+really	O
+want	O
+a	O
+diplomat	O
+to	O
+be	O
+in	O
+charge	O
+of	O
+the	O
+State	O
+Department	O
+,	O
+not	O
+someone	O
+who	O
+is	O
+advocating	O
+for	O
+war	O
+,	O
+”	O
+he	O
+told	O
+“	O
+Face	O
+the	O
+Nation	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+“	O
+I	O
+frankly	O
+think	O
+that	O
+Pompeo	O
+’s	O
+positions	O
+are	O
+too	O
+much	O
+of	O
+an	O
+advocate	O
+for	O
+regime	O
+change	O
+,	O
+really	O
+everywhere	O
+,	O
+”	O
+he	O
+added	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+I	O
+do	O
+n't	O
+think	O
+our	O
+policy	O
+ought	O
+to	O
+be	O
+for	O
+regime	O
+change	O
+,	O
+so	O
+I	O
+think	O
+Pompeo	O
+really	O
+is	O
+n't	O
+a	O
+good	O
+fit	O
+to	O
+be	O
+a	O
+diplomat	O
+.	O
+"	O
+
+He	O
+'s	O
+right	O
+,	O
+too	O
+.	O
+
+Pompeo	O
+has	O
+advocated	O
+for	O
+regime	O
+change	O
+in	O
+North	O
+Korea	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+'ve	O
+seen	O
+exactly	O
+what	O
+happens	O
+when	O
+the	O
+US	O
+gets	O
+involved	O
+in	O
+such	O
+types	O
+of	O
+regime	O
+changes	O
+,	O
+and	O
+the	O
+truth	O
+is	O
+that	O
+they	O
+really	O
+do	O
+n't	O
+work	O
+out	O
+too	O
+well	O
+.	O
+
+As	O
+for	O
+Haspel	O
+,	O
+Paul	O
+told	O
+"	O
+Face	O
+The	O
+Nation	O
+,	O
+"	O
+"	O
+She	O
+oversaw	O
+an	O
+illegal	O
+black	O
+ops	O
+operation	O
+in	O
+Thailand	O
+that	O
+included	O
+torture	O
+.	O
+
+I	B-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+n't	I-PROP
+think	I-PROP
+torture	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+what	I-PROP
+America	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+about	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+"	I-PROP
+
+On	O
+"	O
+State	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Union	O
+,	O
+"	O
+Paul	O
+added	O
+,	O
+"	O
+I	O
+'ll	O
+do	O
+whatever	O
+it	O
+takes	O
+,	O
+and	O
+that	O
+includes	O
+filibuster	O
+"	O
+to	O
+block	O
+their	O
+confirmation	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+I	O
+do	O
+n't	O
+have	O
+the	O
+power	O
+to	O
+stop	O
+her	O
+nomination	O
+,	O
+"	O
+he	O
+said	O
+of	O
+Haspel	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+There	O
+'s	O
+enough	O
+votes	O
+she	O
+'ll	O
+eventually	O
+win	O
+.	O
+
+Few	O
+things	O
+in	O
+life	O
+.	O
+
+.	O
+
+.	O
+
+[	O
+are	O
+]	O
+worth	O
+standing	O
+up	O
+saying	O
+'	O
+enough	O
+is	O
+enough	O
+.	O
+'	O
+"	O
+
+"	O
+We	O
+are	O
+not	O
+a	O
+people	O
+that	O
+should	O
+be	O
+so	O
+fearful	O
+or	O
+vengeful	O
+that	O
+we	O
+think	O
+that	O
+torture	O
+is	O
+somehow	O
+acceptable	O
+,	O
+"	O
+he	O
+added	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+On	B-PROP
+what	I-PROP
+level	I-PROP
+could	I-PROP
+torture	I-PROP
+ever	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+acceptable	I-PROP
+?	O
+
+We	O
+should	O
+make	O
+a	O
+stand	O
+on	O
+this	O
+.	O
+
+She	O
+should	O
+never	O
+lead	O
+the	O
+CIA	O
+.	O
+"	O
+
+Both	O
+nominations	O
+may	O
+face	O
+tough	O
+confirmation	O
+hearings	O
+,	O
+but	O
+it	O
+seems	O
+that	O
+many	O
+Americans	O
+are	O
+just	O
+fine	O
+with	O
+these	O
+types	O
+of	O
+people	O
+being	O
+in	O
+these	O
+types	O
+of	O
+offices	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+only	O
+thing	O
+I	O
+can	O
+think	O
+for	O
+that	O
+kind	O
+of	O
+reasoning	O
+is	O
+that	O
+people	B-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+not	I-PROP
+know	I-PROP
+their	I-PROP
+Constitution	I-PROP
+and	O
+understand	O
+exactly	O
+what	O
+Senator	O
+Paul	O
+is	O
+trying	O
+to	O
+warn	O
+America	O
+about	O
+.	O
+
+Instead	O
+,	O
+people	O
+are	O
+acting	O
+out	O
+of	O
+emotion	O
+and	O
+fear	O
+.	O
+
+Do	O
+I	O
+believe	O
+we	O
+should	O
+be	O
+concerned	O
+about	O
+North	O
+Korea	O
+?	O
+
+Sure	O
+,	O
+but	O
+I	O
+'m	O
+hardly	O
+worried	O
+that	O
+they	O
+will	O
+actually	O
+attack	O
+us	O
+.	O
+
+Am	O
+I	O
+concerned	O
+about	O
+jihadis	O
+?	O
+
+Yep	O
+,	O
+but	O
+I	O
+'m	O
+not	O
+sure	O
+I	O
+'ve	O
+seen	O
+any	O
+real	O
+hard	O
+evidence	O
+that	O
+torturing	B-PROP
+them	O
+has	O
+produced	O
+any	O
+information	O
+that	O
+has	O
+led	O
+to	O
+stopping	O
+terror	O
+attacks	O
+.	O
+
+And	O
+before	O
+you	O
+tell	O
+me	O
+about	O
+the	O
+media	O
+reports	O
+and	O
+CIA	O
+involvement	O
+,	O
+just	O
+keep	O
+in	O
+mind	O
+that	O
+a	O
+former	O
+journalist	O
+,	O
+who	O
+is	O
+now	O
+dead	O
+,	O
+told	O
+the	O
+world	O
+that	O
+the	O
+media	O
+lies	O
+for	O
+the	O
+CIA	O
+.	O
+
+So	O
+,	O
+I	O
+'m	O
+wary	O
+of	O
+media	O
+reports	O
+that	O
+claim	O
+there	O
+have	O
+been	O
+results	O
+from	O
+the	O
+tactics	O
+used	O
+.	O
+
+Trump	O
+has	O
+obviously	O
+had	O
+praise	O
+for	O
+both	O
+Pompeo	O
+and	O
+Haspel	O
+,	O
+but	O
+then	O
+again	O
+,	O
+his	O
+administration	O
+has	O
+quite	O
+a	O
+bit	O
+of	O
+turn	O
+over	O
+too	O
+.	O
+
+Mike	O
+Pompeo	O
+,	O
+Director	O
+of	O
+the	O
+CIA	O
+,	O
+will	O
+become	O
+our	O
+new	O
+Secretary	O
+of	O
+State	O
+.	O
+
+He	B-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+fantastic	I-PROP
+job	I-PROP
+!	O
+
+Thank	O
+you	O
+to	O
+Rex	O
+Tillerson	O
+for	O
+his	O
+service	O
+!	O
+
+Gina	O
+Haspel	O
+will	O
+become	O
+the	O
+new	O
+Director	O
+of	O
+the	O
+CIA	O
+,	O
+and	O
+the	O
+first	O
+woman	O
+so	O
+chosen	O
+.	O
+
+Congratulations	O
+to	O
+all	O
+!	O
+
+—	O
+Donald	O
+J.	O
+Trump	O
+(	O
+@realDonaldTrump	O
+)	O
+March	O
+13	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+We	O
+'ll	O
+see	O
+how	O
+things	O
+turn	O
+out	O
+and	O
+I	O
+'m	O
+sure	O
+Senator	O
+Paul	O
+is	O
+not	O
+issuing	O
+an	O
+empty	O
+threat	O
+in	O
+the	O
+matter	O
+.	O
+
+Bill	O
+Clinton	O
+:	O
+‘	O
+I	O
+Did	O
+The	O
+Right	O
+Thing	O
+’	O
+During	O
+Lewinsky	O
+Affair	O
+;	O
+‘	O
+I	O
+Do	O
+Not	O
+’	O
+Owe	O
+Her	O
+Apology	O
+
+Former	O
+president	O
+Bill	O
+Clinton	O
+has	O
+spoken	O
+out	O
+about	O
+what	O
+happened	O
+during	O
+his	O
+affair	O
+with	O
+former	O
+White	O
+House	O
+intern	O
+Monica	O
+Lewinsky	O
+.	O
+
+Among	O
+other	O
+things	O
+,	O
+Clinton	O
+says	O
+Lewinsky	O
+is	O
+not	O
+owed	O
+an	O
+apology	O
+from	O
+him	O
+and	O
+he	O
+“	O
+did	O
+the	O
+right	O
+thing	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+As	O
+reported	O
+by	O
+CNN	O
+,	O
+Speaking	O
+to	O
+Today	O
+,	O
+Clinton	O
+defended	O
+his	O
+decision	O
+to	O
+remain	O
+in	O
+office	O
+following	O
+the	O
+scandal	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+A	B-PROP
+lot	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+facts	I-PROP
+have	I-PROP
+been	I-PROP
+conveniently	I-PROP
+omitted	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+make	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+story	I-PROP
+work	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+I	I-PROP
+think	I-PROP
+partly	I-PROP
+because	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+’re	I-PROP
+frustrated	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+got	I-PROP
+all	I-PROP
+these	I-PROP
+serious	I-PROP
+allegations	I-PROP
+against	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+current	I-PROP
+occupant	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+Oval	I-PROP
+Office	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+his	I-PROP
+voters	I-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+n’t	I-PROP
+seem	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+care	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+”	I-PROP
+Clinton	O
+said	O
+,	O
+pointing	O
+to	O
+a	O
+series	O
+of	O
+sexual	O
+misconduct	O
+allegations	O
+against	O
+current	O
+President	O
+Donald	O
+Trump	O
+,	O
+who	O
+has	O
+denied	O
+them	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+I	O
+think	O
+I	O
+did	O
+the	O
+right	O
+thing	O
+.	O
+
+I	O
+defended	O
+the	O
+Constitution	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+In	O
+an	O
+essay	O
+for	O
+Vanity	O
+Fair	O
+published	O
+earlier	O
+this	O
+year	O
+,	O
+Lewinsky	O
+said	O
+she	O
+was	O
+questioning	O
+the	O
+narrative	O
+surrounding	O
+the	O
+affair	O
+,	O
+which	O
+played	O
+a	O
+central	O
+role	O
+in	O
+Clinton	O
+’s	O
+eventual	O
+impeachment	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Now	O
+,	O
+at	O
+44	O
+,	O
+I	O
+’m	O
+beginning	O
+(	O
+just	O
+beginning	O
+)	O
+to	O
+consider	O
+the	O
+implications	O
+of	O
+power	O
+differentials	O
+that	O
+were	O
+so	O
+vast	O
+between	O
+a	O
+president	O
+and	O
+a	O
+White	O
+House	O
+intern	O
+,	O
+”	O
+she	O
+wrote	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+I	O
+’m	O
+beginning	O
+to	O
+entertain	O
+the	O
+notion	O
+that	O
+in	O
+such	O
+a	O
+circumstance	O
+the	O
+idea	O
+of	O
+consent	O
+might	O
+well	O
+be	O
+rendered	O
+moot	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+When	O
+asked	O
+if	O
+he	O
+owed	O
+Lewinsky	O
+an	O
+apology	O
+,	O
+President	O
+Clinton	O
+told	O
+NBC‘s	O
+Craig	O
+Melvin	O
+,	O
+“	O
+No	O
+,	O
+I	O
+do	O
+not	O
+—	O
+I	O
+have	O
+never	O
+talked	O
+to	O
+her	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+I	O
+did	O
+say	O
+publicly	O
+on	O
+more	O
+than	O
+one	O
+occasion	O
+that	O
+I	O
+was	O
+sorry	O
+.	O
+
+That	O
+’s	O
+very	O
+different	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+apology	O
+was	O
+public	O
+.	O
+”	O
+Although	O
+some	O
+may	O
+not	O
+have	O
+taken	O
+what	O
+Clinton	O
+said	O
+as	O
+an	O
+apology	O
+,	O
+he	O
+did	O
+publicly	O
+acknowledge	O
+at	O
+the	O
+National	O
+Prayer	O
+Breakfast	O
+in	O
+1998	O
+that	O
+he	O
+had	O
+“	O
+sinned	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+“	O
+I	O
+do	O
+n’t	O
+think	O
+there	O
+is	O
+a	O
+fancy	O
+way	O
+to	O
+say	O
+that	O
+I	O
+have	O
+sinned	O
+.	O
+
+It	O
+is	O
+important	O
+to	O
+me	O
+that	O
+everybody	O
+who	O
+has	O
+been	O
+hurt	O
+know	O
+that	O
+the	O
+sorrow	O
+I	O
+feel	O
+is	O
+genuine	O
+—	O
+first	O
+and	O
+most	O
+important	O
+,	O
+my	O
+family	O
+,	O
+also	O
+my	O
+friends	O
+,	O
+my	O
+staff	O
+,	O
+my	O
+Cabinet	O
+,	O
+Monica	O
+Lewinsky	O
+and	O
+her	O
+family	O
+,	O
+and	O
+the	B-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+people	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Bill	O
+Clinton	O
+:	O
+'	O
+Public	O
+apology	O
+to	O
+Monica	O
+Lewinsky	O
+was	O
+enough	O
+'	O
+
+'	O
+I	O
+felt	O
+terrible	O
+then	O
+and	O
+I	O
+came	O
+to	O
+grips	O
+with	O
+it	O
+.	O
+'	O
+
+Former	O
+President	O
+Bill	O
+Clinton	O
+said	O
+his	O
+public	O
+apology	O
+for	O
+his	O
+affair	O
+with	O
+White	O
+House	O
+intern	O
+Monica	O
+Lewinsky	O
+was	O
+enough	O
+.	O
+
+NBC	O
+’s	O
+“	O
+Today	O
+”	O
+show	O
+correspondent	O
+Craig	O
+Melvin	O
+asked	O
+Clinton	O
+in	O
+an	O
+interview	O
+aired	O
+Monday	O
+if	O
+he	O
+had	O
+ever	O
+apologized	O
+to	O
+Lewinsky	O
+,	O
+who	O
+was	O
+22	O
+and	O
+Clinton	O
+’s	O
+subordinate	O
+when	O
+they	O
+began	O
+an	O
+affair	O
+more	O
+than	O
+two	O
+decades	O
+ago	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+I	B-PROP
+apologized	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+everybody	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+world	I-PROP
+,	O
+”	O
+Clinton	O
+said	O
+of	O
+his	O
+public	O
+apology	O
+.	O
+
+Melvin	O
+followed	O
+up	O
+by	O
+asking	O
+Clinton	O
+if	O
+he	O
+had	O
+ever	O
+apologized	O
+privately	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+I	O
+have	O
+never	O
+talked	O
+to	O
+her	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+I	O
+did	O
+say	O
+publicly	O
+on	O
+more	O
+than	O
+one	O
+occasion	O
+that	O
+I	O
+was	O
+sorry	O
+.	O
+
+That	O
+’s	O
+very	O
+different	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+apology	O
+was	O
+public	O
+,	O
+”	O
+he	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+Clinton	O
+made	O
+his	O
+public	O
+apology	O
+in	O
+1998	O
+during	O
+the	O
+National	O
+Prayer	O
+Breakfast	O
+.	O
+
+צילום	O
+:	O
+Reuters	O
+Clinton	O
+whispers	O
+to	O
+first	O
+lady	O
+Hillary	O
+Clinton	O
+during	O
+White	O
+House	O
+event	O
+
+“	O
+I	O
+do	O
+n’t	O
+think	O
+there	O
+is	O
+a	O
+fancy	O
+way	O
+to	O
+say	O
+that	O
+I	O
+have	O
+sinned	O
+,	O
+”	O
+he	O
+said	O
+there	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+It	O
+is	O
+important	O
+to	O
+me	O
+that	O
+everybody	O
+who	O
+has	O
+been	O
+hurt	O
+know	O
+that	O
+the	O
+sorrow	O
+I	O
+feel	O
+is	O
+genuine	O
+—	O
+first	O
+and	O
+most	O
+important	O
+,	O
+my	O
+family	O
+,	O
+also	O
+my	O
+friends	O
+,	O
+my	O
+staff	O
+,	O
+my	O
+Cabinet	O
+,	O
+Monica	O
+Lewinsky	O
+and	O
+her	O
+family	O
+,	O
+and	O
+the	B-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+people	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Clinton	O
+told	O
+Melvin	O
+that	O
+at	O
+the	O
+time	O
+the	O
+affair	O
+became	O
+public	O
+,	O
+“	O
+I	O
+felt	O
+terrible	O
+then	O
+and	O
+I	O
+came	O
+to	O
+grips	O
+with	O
+it	O
+.	O
+”	O
+He	O
+said	O
+later	O
+in	O
+the	O
+interview	O
+:	O
+“	O
+I	O
+dealt	O
+with	O
+it	O
+20	O
+years	O
+ago	O
+plus	O
+…	O
+I	O
+’ve	O
+tried	O
+to	O
+do	O
+a	O
+good	O
+job	O
+since	O
+then	O
+with	O
+my	O
+life	O
+and	O
+my	O
+work	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Clinton	O
+also	O
+said	O
+that	O
+he	O
+did	O
+not	O
+regret	O
+his	O
+decision	O
+to	O
+fight	O
+impeachment	O
+,	O
+and	O
+noted	O
+that	O
+he	O
+left	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+$	O
+16	O
+million	O
+in	O
+debt	O
+from	O
+his	O
+defense	O
+.	O
+
+Clinton	O
+and	O
+author	O
+James	O
+Patterson	O
+appeared	O
+on	O
+“	O
+Today	O
+”	O
+to	O
+promote	O
+their	O
+jointly	O
+authored	O
+novel	O
+“	O
+The	O
+President	O
+is	O
+Missing	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+In	O
+an	O
+apparent	O
+response	O
+to	O
+the	O
+“	O
+Today	O
+”	O
+interview	O
+,	O
+Lewinsky	O
+tweeted	O
+Monday	O
+that	O
+she	O
+is	O
+“	O
+grateful	O
+to	O
+the	O
+myriad	O
+people	O
+who	O
+have	O
+helped	O
+me	O
+evolve	O
++	O
+gain	O
+perspective	O
+in	O
+the	O
+past	O
+20	O
+years	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+She	O
+also	O
+tweeted	O
+a	O
+link	O
+to	O
+a	O
+personal	O
+essay	O
+she	O
+wrote	O
+in	O
+February	O
+for	O
+Vanity	O
+Fair	O
+on	O
+the	O
+20th	O
+anniversary	O
+of	O
+the	O
+investigation	O
+into	O
+the	O
+affair	O
+,	O
+in	O
+which	O
+she	O
+admitted	O
+that	O
+she	O
+suffers	O
+from	O
+PTSD	O
+over	O
+the	O
+fallout	O
+from	O
+the	O
+investigation	O
+and	O
+publicity	O
+,	O
+and	O
+that	O
+the	O
+#	O
+MeToo	O
+movement	O
+had	O
+changed	O
+her	O
+perspective	O
+on	O
+the	O
+affair	O
+and	O
+its	O
+aftermath	O
+.	O
+
+Bill	O
+Clinton	O
+insists	O
+he	O
+does	O
+n't	O
+owe	O
+Monica	O
+Lewinsky	O
+an	O
+apology	O
+
+Former	O
+President	O
+Bill	O
+Clinton	O
+insisted	O
+in	O
+a	O
+weekend	O
+interview	O
+that	O
+he	O
+does	O
+n't	O
+owe	O
+a	O
+personal	O
+apology	O
+to	O
+Monica	O
+Lewinsky	O
+,	O
+the	O
+former	O
+White	O
+House	O
+intern	O
+whose	O
+adult	O
+life	O
+has	O
+been	O
+defined	O
+by	O
+their	O
+inappropriate	O
+sexual	O
+affair	O
+and	O
+the	O
+global	O
+scrutiny	O
+that	O
+followed	O
+.	O
+
+'	O
+No	O
+,	O
+'	O
+he	O
+told	O
+NBC	O
+in	O
+an	O
+interview	O
+airing	O
+Monday	O
+on	O
+the	O
+'	O
+Today	O
+'	O
+show	O
+.	O
+
+'	O
+I	O
+do	O
+not	O
+–	O
+I	O
+have	O
+never	O
+talked	O
+to	O
+her	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+I	O
+did	O
+say	O
+publicly	O
+on	O
+more	O
+than	O
+one	O
+occasion	O
+that	O
+I	O
+was	O
+sorry	O
+.	O
+'	O
+
+'	O
+I	B-PROP
+apologized	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+everybody	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+world	I-PROP
+,	O
+'	O
+Clinton	O
+said	O
+,	O
+implying	O
+that	O
+was	O
+enough	O
+.	O
+
+And	O
+the	O
+flustered	B-PROP
+former	I-PROP
+president	O
+,	O
+more	O
+famous	O
+for	O
+his	O
+Don	B-PROP
+Juan	O
+-	O
+like	O
+seductions	O
+than	O
+for	O
+his	O
+policy	O
+legacy	O
+,	O
+portrayed	O
+himself	O
+,	O
+not	O
+Lewinsky	O
+,	O
+as	O
+history	B-PROP
+'s	I-PROP
+victim	I-PROP
+in	O
+the	O
+mass	O
+-	O
+media	O
+'s	O
+retelling	O
+of	O
+the	O
+1990s	O
+saga	O
+.	O
+
+SCROLL	O
+DOWN	O
+FOR	O
+VIDEOS	O
+
+Former	O
+President	O
+Bill	O
+Clinton	O
+said	O
+in	O
+an	O
+NBC	O
+interview	O
+airing	O
+Monday	O
+that	O
+he	O
+'s	O
+never	O
+personally	O
+apologized	O
+to	O
+Monica	O
+Lewinsky	O
+for	O
+how	O
+their	O
+sexual	O
+affair	O
+turned	O
+her	O
+life	O
+upside	O
+down	O
+–	O
+and	O
+he	O
+does	O
+n't	O
+owe	O
+her	O
+a	O
+mea	O
+-	O
+culpa	O
+
+The	O
+former	O
+president	O
+carried	O
+on	O
+a	O
+lengthy	O
+affair	O
+with	O
+Lewinsky	O
+,	O
+often	O
+trysting	O
+with	O
+her	O
+just	O
+steps	O
+from	O
+the	O
+Oval	O
+Office	O
+
+Watch	O
+part	O
+one	O
+of	O
+@craigmelvin	O
+'s	O
+interview	O
+with	O
+Bill	O
+Clinton	O
+and	O
+James	O
+Patterson	O
+pic.twitter.com/UC8KAQw8Ge	O
+—	O
+TODAY	O
+(	O
+@TODAYshow	O
+)	O
+June	O
+4	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+Her	O
+too	O
+:	O
+Lewinsky	O
+has	O
+emerged	O
+as	O
+an	O
+anti	O
+-	O
+bullying	O
+activist	O
+and	O
+now	O
+says	O
+Clinton	O
+engaged	O
+in	O
+a	B-PROP
+'	O
+gross	B-PROP
+abuse	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+power	I-PROP
+'	O
+by	O
+seducing	O
+her	O
+
+'	O
+A	O
+lot	O
+of	O
+the	O
+facts	O
+have	O
+been	O
+omitted	O
+to	O
+make	O
+the	O
+story	O
+work	O
+,	O
+'	O
+he	O
+declared	O
+,	O
+'	O
+I	O
+think	O
+partly	O
+because	B-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+'re	I-PROP
+frustrated	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+got	I-PROP
+all	I-PROP
+these	I-PROP
+serious	I-PROP
+allegations	I-PROP
+against	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+current	I-PROP
+occupant	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+Oval	I-PROP
+Office	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+his	I-PROP
+voters	I-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+n't	I-PROP
+seem	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+care	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+'	I-PROP
+
+And	O
+Clinton	O
+complained	O
+in	O
+the	O
+interview	O
+that	O
+he	O
+left	O
+the	O
+presidency	O
+financially	B-PROP
+ruined	O
+because	O
+of	O
+the	O
+costs	O
+associated	O
+with	O
+the	O
+legal	O
+consequences	O
+of	O
+his	O
+actions	O
+.	O
+
+'	O
+Nobody	O
+believes	O
+that	O
+I	O
+got	O
+out	O
+of	O
+that	O
+for	O
+free	O
+,	O
+'	O
+he	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+'	O
+I	O
+left	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+$	O
+16	O
+million	O
+in	O
+debt	O
+,	O
+'	O
+
+He	O
+'s	O
+worth	O
+about	O
+$	O
+80	O
+million	O
+today	O
+,	O
+aided	O
+by	O
+an	O
+aggressive	B-PROP
+schedule	O
+of	O
+speaking	O
+events	O
+–	O
+many	O
+of	O
+which	O
+paid	O
+him	O
+six	O
+-	O
+figure	O
+fees	O
+for	O
+individual	O
+appearances	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+a	O
+March	O
+essay	O
+for	O
+Vanity	O
+Fair	O
+magazine	O
+,	O
+Lewinsky	O
+wrote	O
+that	O
+'	O
+what	O
+transpired	O
+between	O
+Bill	O
+Clinton	O
+and	O
+myself	O
+was	O
+not	O
+sexual	O
+assault	O
+,	O
+although	O
+we	O
+now	O
+recognize	O
+that	O
+it	O
+constituted	O
+a	O
+gross	B-PROP
+abuse	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+power	I-PROP
+.	O
+'	O
+
+Clinton	O
+is	O
+now	O
+on	O
+a	O
+book	O
+tour	O
+with	O
+co	O
+-	O
+author	O
+James	O
+Patterson	O
+but	O
+got	O
+pointed	O
+questions	O
+from	O
+NBC	O
+in	O
+an	O
+interview	O
+that	O
+aired	O
+Monday	O
+morning	O
+
+Clinton	O
+,	O
+pictured	O
+denying	O
+his	O
+May	O
+-	O
+December	O
+affair	O
+when	O
+he	O
+was	O
+president	O
+,	O
+was	O
+already	O
+noted	O
+at	O
+the	O
+time	O
+for	O
+his	O
+lothario	O
+habits	O
+
+But	O
+decades	O
+later	O
+,	O
+she	O
+'s	O
+still	O
+traumatized	B-PROP
+by	O
+the	O
+aftermath	O
+of	O
+being	O
+identifed	O
+globally	O
+as	O
+the	O
+your	B-PROP
+woman	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+President	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+United	I-PROP
+States	I-PROP
+kept	O
+on	O
+the	O
+side	O
+and	O
+used	O
+for	O
+his	O
+own	O
+pleasure	O
+just	O
+a	O
+few	O
+feet	O
+from	O
+the	O
+Oval	O
+Office	O
+.	O
+
+'	O
+I	O
+’m	O
+sorry	O
+to	O
+say	O
+I	O
+do	O
+n’t	O
+have	O
+a	O
+definitive	O
+answer	O
+yet	O
+on	O
+the	O
+meaning	O
+of	O
+all	O
+of	O
+the	O
+events	O
+that	O
+led	O
+to	O
+the	O
+1998	O
+investigation	O
+,	O
+'	O
+Lewinsky	O
+wrote	O
+of	O
+the	O
+public	B-PROP
+humiliation	I-PROP
+that	O
+played	O
+out	O
+in	O
+seeming	O
+slow	O
+motion	O
+.	O
+
+'	O
+I	O
+am	O
+unpacking	O
+and	O
+reprocessing	O
+what	O
+happened	O
+to	O
+me	O
+.	O
+
+Over	O
+and	O
+over	O
+and	O
+over	O
+again	O
+.	O
+'	O
+
+Clinton	O
+is	O
+launching	O
+a	O
+book	O
+tour	O
+to	O
+promote	O
+'	O
+The	O
+President	O
+is	O
+Missing	O
+,	O
+'	O
+a	O
+fictional	O
+political	O
+thriller	O
+co	O
+-	O
+written	O
+with	O
+the	O
+famed	O
+author	O
+James	O
+Patterson	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+accused	O
+interviewed	O
+Craig	O
+Melvin	O
+of	O
+'	O
+ignor[ing	O
+]	O
+gaping	O
+facts	O
+in	O
+describing	O
+this	O
+,	O
+and	O
+I	O
+bet	O
+you	O
+do	O
+n't	O
+know	O
+you	O
+do	O
+n't	O
+know	O
+them	O
+.	O
+'	O
+
+'	O
+This	O
+was	O
+litigated	O
+20	O
+years	O
+ago	O
+.	O
+
+Two	O
+-	O
+thirds	O
+of	O
+the	O
+American	O
+people	O
+sided	O
+with	O
+me	O
+.	O
+'	O
+
+Lewinsky	O
+is	O
+pictured	O
+on	O
+September	O
+21	O
+,	O
+1998	O
+meeting	O
+with	O
+then	O
+-	O
+president	O
+Bill	O
+Clinton	O
+at	O
+a	O
+White	O
+House	O
+function	O
+
+If	O
+he	O
+were	O
+president	O
+today	O
+,	O
+he	O
+said	O
+later	O
+,	O
+his	O
+most	O
+famous	O
+extramarital	O
+affair	O
+would	O
+n't	O
+'	O
+be	O
+an	O
+issue	O
+,	O
+because	O
+people	O
+would	O
+be	O
+using	O
+the	O
+facts	O
+instead	O
+of	O
+the	O
+imagined	O
+facts	O
+.	O
+'	O
+
+Patterson	O
+,	O
+too	O
+,	O
+defended	O
+Clinton	O
+–	O
+by	O
+comparing	O
+his	O
+sexual	O
+affairs	O
+in	O
+office	O
+with	O
+those	O
+of	O
+two	O
+preceding	O
+Democratic	O
+presidents	O
+.	O
+
+'	O
+It	O
+'s	O
+20	O
+years	O
+ago	O
+,	O
+come	B-PROP
+on	I-PROP
+!	O
+'	O
+
+he	O
+blasted	B-PROP
+Melvin	O
+.	O
+
+'	O
+Let	O
+'s	O
+talk	O
+about	O
+JFK	O
+.	O
+
+Let	O
+'s	O
+talk	O
+about	O
+,	O
+you	O
+know	O
+,	O
+LBJ	O
+.	O
+
+Stop	O
+already	O
+!	O
+'	O
+
+Clinton	O
+piled	O
+on	O
+.	O
+
+'	O
+You	O
+think	O
+President	O
+Kennedy	O
+should	O
+have	O
+resigned	O
+?	O
+
+Do	O
+you	O
+believe	O
+President	O
+Johnson	O
+should	O
+have	O
+resigned	O
+?	O
+
+Someone	O
+should	O
+ask	O
+you	O
+these	O
+questions	O
+because	O
+of	O
+the	O
+way	O
+you	O
+formulate	O
+the	O
+questions	O
+,	O
+'	O
+he	O
+jabbed	O
+.	O
+
+'	O
+I	O
+dealt	O
+with	O
+it	O
+20	O
+years	O
+ago	O
+,	O
+plus	O
+.	O
+'	O
+
+Suddenly	O
+philosophical	O
+and	O
+seeming	O
+to	O
+take	O
+a	O
+longer	O
+view	O
+of	O
+history	O
+,	O
+Clinton	O
+said	O
+:	O
+'	O
+I	O
+have	O
+tried	O
+to	O
+do	O
+a	O
+good	O
+job	O
+since	O
+then	O
+with	O
+my	O
+life	O
+and	O
+with	O
+my	O
+work	O
+.	O
+
+That	B-PROP
+'s	I-PROP
+all	I-PROP
+I	I-PROP
+have	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+say	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+you	O
+.	O
+'	O
+
+More	O
+UK	O
+Sharia	O
+:	O
+Firefighter	O
+Suspended	O
+For	O
+Supporting	O
+Tommy	O
+Robinson	O
+
+No	O
+one	O
+can	O
+say	O
+this	O
+is	O
+not	O
+what	O
+this	O
+is	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Sharia	O
+is	O
+being	O
+implemented	O
+in	O
+the	O
+United	O
+Kingdom	O
+and	O
+the	O
+Muslims	O
+are	O
+ready	O
+to	O
+seek	O
+total	O
+control	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+latest	O
+evidence	O
+of	O
+that	O
+fact	O
+is	O
+the	O
+suspension	O
+of	O
+a	O
+firefighter	O
+who	O
+simply	O
+voiced	O
+his	O
+support	O
+for	O
+the	O
+English	O
+Defence	O
+League	O
+'s	O
+founder	O
+,	O
+Tommy	O
+Robinson	O
+.	O
+
+A	O
+firefighter	O
+with	O
+Nottinghamshire	O
+Fire	O
+and	O
+Rescue	O
+Service	O
+took	O
+to	O
+Facebook	O
+to	O
+state	O
+that	O
+he	O
+had	O
+been	O
+suspended	O
+from	O
+his	O
+job	O
+over	O
+giving	O
+support	O
+to	O
+Stephen	O
+Yaxley	O
+-	O
+Lennon	O
+,	O
+aka	O
+Tommy	O
+Robinson	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Daily	O
+Star	O
+reports	O
+:	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+Whom	O
+do	O
+you	O
+consider	O
+to	O
+be	O
+the	O
+most	O
+corrupt	O
+Democrat	O
+Politician	O
+?	O
+
+Whom	O
+do	O
+you	O
+consider	O
+to	O
+be	O
+the	O
+most	O
+corrupt	O
+Democrat	O
+Politician	O
+?	O
+
+Whom	O
+do	O
+you	O
+consider	O
+to	O
+be	O
+the	O
+most	O
+corrupt	O
+Democrat	O
+Politician	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+Dianne	O
+Feinstein	O
+Maxine	O
+Waters	O
+Adam	O
+Schiff	O
+Chuck	O
+Schumer	O
+Kamala	O
+Harris	O
+Kirsten	O
+Gillibrand	O
+Keith	O
+Ellison	O
+Cory	O
+Booker	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Phone	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Freedom	O
+Outpost	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+Now	O
+,	O
+a	O
+firefighter	O
+has	O
+taken	O
+to	O
+his	O
+social	O
+media	O
+account	O
+“	O
+Jono	O
+Booth	O
+”	O
+and	O
+claims	O
+to	O
+have	O
+been	O
+suspended	O
+after	O
+supporting	O
+Robinson	O
+on	O
+Facebook	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+open	O
+account	O
+account	O
+messaged	O
+publicly	O
+in	O
+support	O
+of	O
+jailed	O
+Robinson	O
+.	O
+
+After	O
+a	O
+number	O
+of	O
+messages	O
+,	O
+the	O
+account	O
+claimed	O
+the	O
+firefighter	O
+was	O
+leaving	O
+Nottinghamshire	O
+Fire	O
+and	O
+Rescue	O
+Service	O
+after	O
+being	O
+suspended	O
+over	O
+his	O
+conduct	O
+on	O
+Facebook	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+post	O
+read	O
+:	O
+“	O
+Well	O
+after	O
+22	O
+years	O
+in	O
+the	O
+fire	O
+service	O
+as	O
+a	O
+firefighter	O
+for	O
+Nottinghamshire	O
+,	O
+yesterday	O
+I	O
+had	O
+a	O
+phone	O
+call	O
+from	O
+the	O
+fire	O
+service	O
+saying	O
+that	O
+I	O
+’ve	O
+been	O
+suspended	O
+from	O
+duty	O
+with	O
+immediate	O
+effect	O
+and	O
+I	O
+had	O
+to	O
+hand	O
+in	O
+my	O
+on	O
+call	O
+alerter	O
+and	O
+photo	O
+I.D	O
+card	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+On	O
+asking	O
+for	O
+what	O
+reason	O
+this	O
+was	O
+happening	O
+I	O
+was	O
+told	O
+I	O
+was	O
+going	O
+to	O
+be	O
+investigated	O
+on	O
+some	O
+of	O
+the	O
+content	O
+I	O
+had	O
+recently	O
+put	O
+on	O
+Facebook	O
+.	O
+”	O
+He	O
+added	O
+:	O
+“	O
+Since	O
+yesterday	O
+morning	O
+’s	O
+phone	O
+call	O
+from	O
+them	O
+I	O
+have	O
+since	O
+handed	O
+my	O
+notice	O
+in	O
+at	O
+the	O
+fire	O
+service	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Firefighter	O
+Booth	O
+signing	O
+off	O
+.	O
+”	O
+…	O
+
+Robinson	O
+was	O
+arrested	O
+,	O
+tried	O
+,	O
+and	O
+sentenced	O
+to	O
+13	O
+months	O
+within	O
+an	O
+hour	O
+for	O
+simply	O
+reporting	O
+outside	O
+a	O
+criminal	O
+trial	O
+involving	O
+a	O
+Muslim	O
+rape	O
+gang	O
+at	O
+Leeds	O
+Crown	O
+Court	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+judge	O
+also	O
+put	O
+a	O
+gag	O
+on	O
+the	O
+press	O
+so	O
+they	O
+were	O
+not	O
+allowed	O
+to	O
+report	O
+on	O
+the	O
+arrest	O
+,	O
+and	O
+many	O
+reputable	O
+outlets	O
+complied	O
+by	O
+removing	O
+their	O
+stories	O
+.	O
+
+Robinson	O
+was	O
+denied	O
+due	O
+process	O
+,	O
+according	O
+to	O
+the	O
+judge	O
+.	O
+
+Robinson	O
+has	O
+been	O
+at	O
+the	O
+forefront	O
+of	O
+exposing	O
+the	O
+criminal	O
+elements	O
+in	O
+Islam	O
+.	O
+
+Just	O
+last	O
+week	O
+I	O
+reported	O
+on	O
+his	O
+previous	O
+comments	O
+about	O
+being	O
+incarcerated	O
+earlier	O
+and	O
+that	O
+it	O
+might	O
+be	O
+a	O
+plot	O
+to	O
+get	O
+rid	O
+of	O
+him	O
+in	O
+prison	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+is	O
+n't	O
+far	O
+-	O
+fetched	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+March	O
+,	O
+we	O
+reported	O
+on	O
+Britain	O
+First	O
+'s	O
+Paul	O
+Golding	O
+was	O
+attacked	O
+by	O
+two	O
+inmates	O
+at	O
+HMP	O
+Elmley	O
+,	O
+on	O
+the	O
+Isle	O
+of	O
+Sheppey	O
+,	O
+Kent	O
+.	O
+
+Golding	O
+was	O
+found	O
+guilty	O
+on	O
+7	O
+March	O
+at	O
+Folkestone	O
+Magistrates	O
+’	O
+Court	O
+of	O
+religiously	O
+-	O
+aggravated	O
+harassment	O
+alongside	O
+deputy	O
+leader	O
+Jayda	O
+Fransen	O
+which	O
+they	O
+carried	O
+out	O
+in	O
+Kent	O
+in	O
+May	O
+last	O
+year	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+court	O
+heard	O
+the	O
+pair	O
+launched	O
+a	O
+political	O
+campaign	O
+in	O
+which	O
+they	O
+claimed	O
+to	O
+be	O
+trying	O
+to	O
+expose	O
+Muslim	O
+men	O
+who	O
+were	O
+the	O
+subject	O
+of	O
+a	O
+rape	O
+trial	O
+.	O
+
+So	B-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+expose	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+Islamists	I-PROP
+fro	I-PROP
+who	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+what	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+what	I-PROP
+Islam	I-PROP
+'s	I-PROP
+founder	I-PROP
+not	I-PROP
+only	I-PROP
+taught	I-PROP
+them	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+but	I-PROP
+modeled	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+them	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+you	I-PROP
+may	I-PROP
+just	I-PROP
+find	I-PROP
+yourself	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+jail	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+UK	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+Sadly	O
+,	O
+the	O
+same	O
+scenario	O
+is	O
+making	O
+some	O
+strides	O
+in	O
+the	O
+US	O
+,	O
+as	O
+well	O
+.	O
+
+Free	O
+Tommy	O
+Robinson	O
+protests	O
+are	O
+set	O
+for	O
+this	O
+weekend	O
+,	O
+and	O
+Dutch	O
+MP	O
+Geert	O
+Wilders	O
+has	O
+said	O
+he	O
+will	O
+join	O
+those	O
+protests	O
+.	O
+
+Wilders	O
+has	O
+called	O
+Robinson	O
+'s	O
+imprisonment	O
+a	O
+"	O
+disgrace	B-PROP
+.	O
+"	O
+
+He	O
+told	O
+Breitbart	O
+:	O
+
+Tommy	O
+Robinson	O
+was	O
+arrested	O
+on	O
+May	O
+25	O
+outside	O
+Leeds	O
+Crown	O
+Court	O
+after	O
+using	O
+social	O
+media	O
+to	O
+broadcast	O
+details	O
+of	O
+an	O
+ongoing	O
+trial	O
+which	O
+was	O
+subject	O
+to	O
+reporting	O
+restrictions	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+was	O
+arrested	O
+,	O
+brought	O
+before	O
+a	O
+judge	O
+,	O
+and	O
+sentenced	O
+within	O
+five	O
+hours	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+judge	O
+ordered	O
+a	O
+media	O
+ban	O
+on	O
+his	O
+arrest	O
+and	O
+imprisonment	O
+,	O
+even	O
+forcing	O
+British	O
+publications	O
+to	O
+delete	O
+their	O
+articles	O
+about	O
+the	O
+case	O
+.	O
+
+Such	O
+measures	O
+are	O
+common	O
+practice	O
+in	O
+North	O
+Korea	O
+and	O
+Saudi	O
+Arabia	O
+.	O
+
+It	O
+is	O
+sad	O
+to	O
+see	O
+how	O
+Britain	O
+,	O
+the	B-PROP
+cradle	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+Western	I-PROP
+democracy	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+rule	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+law	I-PROP
+,	O
+is	O
+fast	B-PROP
+descending	I-PROP
+into	I-PROP
+tyranny	B-PROP
+.	O
+
+Tommy	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+hero	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+It	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+disgrace	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+he	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+still	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+jail	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+I	O
+have	O
+been	O
+invited	O
+to	O
+a	O
+major	O
+protest	O
+demonstration	O
+in	O
+London	O
+next	O
+week	O
+,	O
+and	O
+I	O
+will	O
+be	O
+coming	O
+.	O
+
+Free	O
+Tommy	O
+now	O
+.	O
+
+Indeed	B-PROP
+!	I-PROP
+
+Free	O
+Tommy	O
+Robinson	O
+now	O
+!	O
+
+Who	O
+Is	O
+Behind	O
+the	B-PROP
+Internet	I-PROP
+Thought	I-PROP
+Police	I-PROP
+?	O
+
+An	O
+article	O
+,	O
+“	O
+What	O
+the	O
+Red	O
+Pill	O
+Means	O
+for	O
+Radicals	O
+,	O
+”	O
+published	O
+on	O
+June	O
+7	O
+in	O
+the	O
+ironically	O
+named	O
+publication	O
+Fair	O
+Observer	O
+might	O
+have	O
+passed	O
+unnoticed	O
+as	O
+yet	B-PROP
+another	I-PROP
+uninformed	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+biased	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+ideologically	I-PROP
+motivated	I-PROP
+attack	I-PROP
+on	I-PROP
+all	I-PROP
+who	I-PROP
+ever	I-PROP
+get	I-PROP
+labeled	I-PROP
+“	I-PROP
+extremists	I-PROP
+.	O
+”	O
+The	O
+piece	O
+is	O
+so	B-PROP
+riddled	I-PROP
+with	I-PROP
+non	I-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+sequiturs	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+wild	I-PROP
+generalizations	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+seems	I-PROP
+almost	I-PROP
+cruel	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+rip	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+shreds	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+But	O
+the	O
+author	O
+is	O
+Bharath	O
+Ganesh	O
+.	O
+
+A	O
+little	O
+online	O
+research	O
+reveals	O
+that	O
+Ganesh	O
+is	O
+currently	O
+working	O
+at	O
+the	O
+Oxford	O
+Internet	O
+Institute	O
+—	O
+at	O
+the	O
+esteemed	O
+Oxford	O
+University	O
+—	O
+on	O
+a	O
+research	O
+project	O
+funded	O
+by	O
+the	O
+European	O
+Union	O
+to	O
+devise	O
+ways	O
+to	O
+disrupt	O
+the	O
+“	O
+far	O
+right	O
+”	O
+online	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+project	O
+in	O
+question	O
+is	O
+under	O
+the	O
+banner	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Vox	O
+-	O
+Pol	O
+Network	O
+of	O
+Excellence	O
+,	O
+which	O
+“	O
+is	O
+designed	O
+to	O
+comprehensively	O
+research	O
+,	O
+analyse	O
+,	O
+debate	O
+,	O
+and	O
+critique	O
+issues	O
+surrounding	O
+violent	O
+online	O
+political	O
+extremism	O
+(	O
+VOPE	O
+)	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+This	O
+research	O
+group	O
+is	O
+only	O
+interested	O
+in	O
+violent	B-PROP
+extremism	I-PROP
+–	O
+according	O
+to	O
+their	O
+website	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+The	O
+qualifier	O
+‘	O
+violent	O
+’	O
+is	O
+therefore	O
+employed	O
+here	O
+to	O
+describe	O
+VOX	O
+-	O
+Pol	O
+’s	O
+interest	O
+,	O
+which	O
+is	O
+in	O
+those	O
+that	O
+employ	O
+or	O
+advocate	O
+physical	O
+violence	O
+against	O
+other	O
+individuals	O
+and	O
+groups	O
+to	O
+forward	O
+their	O
+political	O
+objectives	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+extremist	O
+nature	O
+of	O
+the	O
+politics	O
+in	O
+which	O
+VOX	O
+-	O
+Pol	O
+is	O
+interested	O
+is	O
+thus	O
+not	O
+decided	O
+upon	O
+by	O
+project	O
+participants	O
+,	O
+but	O
+by	O
+the	O
+decision	O
+of	O
+those	O
+involved	O
+in	O
+particular	O
+types	O
+of	O
+politics	O
+to	O
+advocate	O
+or	O
+employ	O
+violence	O
+to	O
+advance	O
+their	O
+goals	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+
+Whom	O
+do	O
+you	O
+consider	O
+to	O
+be	O
+the	O
+most	O
+corrupt	O
+Democrat	O
+Politician	O
+?	O
+
+Whom	O
+do	O
+you	O
+consider	O
+to	O
+be	O
+the	O
+most	O
+corrupt	O
+Democrat	O
+Politician	O
+?	O
+
+Whom	O
+do	O
+you	O
+consider	O
+to	O
+be	O
+the	O
+most	O
+corrupt	O
+Democrat	O
+Politician	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+Dianne	O
+Feinstein	O
+Maxine	O
+Waters	O
+Adam	O
+Schiff	O
+Chuck	O
+Schumer	O
+Kamala	O
+Harris	O
+Kirsten	O
+Gillibrand	O
+Keith	O
+Ellison	O
+Cory	O
+Booker	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Phone	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Freedom	O
+Outpost	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+Note	O
+the	O
+claims	O
+–	O
+utterly	B-PROP
+disingenuous	I-PROP
+,	O
+as	O
+it	O
+turns	O
+out	O
+–	O
+that	O
+the	O
+labeling	O
+of	O
+certain	O
+people	O
+or	O
+groups	O
+as	O
+“	O
+violent	B-PROP
+extremists	I-PROP
+”	O
+is	O
+entirely	O
+due	O
+to	O
+their	O
+own	O
+behavior	O
+;	O
+in	O
+other	O
+words	O
+,	O
+do	B-PROP
+n’t	I-PROP
+worry	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+folks	I-PROP
+,	O
+it	O
+’s	O
+all	O
+scientifically	O
+objective	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+research	O
+is	O
+being	O
+used	O
+to	O
+advise	O
+companies	O
+who	O
+host	O
+online	O
+platforms	O
+,	O
+such	O
+as	O
+Facebook	O
+,	O
+as	O
+well	O
+as	O
+governments	O
+,	O
+on	O
+how	O
+to	O
+stamp	B-PROP
+out	I-PROP
+online	O
+radicalization	O
+–	O
+using	O
+strategies	O
+such	O
+as	O
+working	O
+out	O
+ways	O
+of	O
+preventing	O
+people	O
+from	O
+seeing	O
+material	O
+posted	O
+that	O
+is	O
+deemed	O
+unsuitable	O
+in	O
+some	O
+way	O
+,	O
+or	O
+offering	O
+them	O
+alternative	O
+“	O
+nice	O
+”	O
+things	O
+to	O
+look	O
+at	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+is	O
+a	O
+seriously	O
+important	O
+issue	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+people	O
+and	O
+political	O
+powers	O
+behind	O
+such	O
+initiatives	O
+are	O
+manipulating	O
+behavior	O
+online	O
+and	O
+literally	O
+controlling	O
+how	O
+people	O
+think	O
+and	O
+get	O
+information	O
+.	O
+
+They	O
+are	O
+the	O
+appointed	O
+guardians	O
+of	O
+the	O
+online	O
+hoi	O
+polloi	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+who	O
+guards	O
+the	O
+guardians	O
+?	O
+
+For	O
+if	O
+Dr.	O
+Ganesh	O
+is	O
+in	O
+charge	O
+,	O
+we	O
+have	O
+some	O
+very	B-PROP
+worrying	I-PROP
+questions	I-PROP
+to	O
+ask	O
+.	O
+
+One	O
+could	O
+start	O
+from	O
+the	O
+observation	O
+that	O
+the	O
+article	O
+is	O
+certainly	O
+not	O
+an	O
+academic	O
+piece	O
+,	O
+and	O
+gives	O
+no	O
+concrete	O
+evidence	O
+for	O
+any	O
+of	O
+the	O
+sweeping	O
+claims	O
+it	O
+makes	O
+about	O
+the	O
+so	O
+-	O
+called	O
+“	O
+alt	O
+-	O
+right	O
+”	O
+and	O
+the	O
+“	O
+manosphere	O
+”	O
+;	O
+nor	O
+does	O
+it	O
+,	O
+as	O
+any	O
+academic	O
+should	O
+do	O
+,	O
+attempt	O
+to	O
+test	O
+ideas	O
+and	O
+consider	O
+alternative	O
+explanations	O
+.	O
+
+(	O
+Oddly	B-PROP
+enough	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+this	I-PROP
+makes	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+rather	I-PROP
+like	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+groups	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+claims	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+criticize	I-PROP
+.	O
+)	O
+
+And	O
+the	O
+label	O
+of	O
+“	O
+violent	B-PROP
+extremist	I-PROP
+”	O
+turns	O
+out	O
+to	O
+be	O
+used	O
+very	O
+generously	O
+.	O
+
+Ganesh	O
+makes	O
+wild	O
+leaps	O
+and	O
+inferences	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+talks	O
+of	O
+Darren	O
+Osborne	O
+,	O
+the	O
+perpetrator	O
+of	O
+the	O
+vehicular	O
+attack	O
+on	O
+Finsbury	O
+Park	O
+Mosque	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+was	O
+a	O
+heinous	B-PROP
+crime	I-PROP
+,	O
+and	O
+should	O
+rightly	O
+be	O
+condemned	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+why	O
+did	O
+Osborne	O
+do	O
+this	O
+,	O
+according	O
+to	O
+Ganesh	O
+?	O
+
+The	O
+attack	O
+“	O
+was	O
+executed	O
+after	O
+he	O
+had	O
+become	O
+indignant	O
+after	O
+watching	O
+a	O
+BBC	O
+broadcast	O
+on	O
+child	O
+sexual	O
+exploitation	O
+and	O
+turned	O
+to	O
+social	O
+media	O
+to	O
+make	O
+sense	O
+of	O
+it	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+found	O
+a	O
+narrative	O
+from	O
+British	O
+counter	O
+-	O
+jihad	O
+groups	O
+closely	O
+aligned	O
+with	O
+the	O
+alt	O
+-	O
+right	O
+,	O
+such	O
+as	O
+Britain	O
+First	O
+and	O
+the	O
+founder	O
+of	O
+the	O
+English	O
+Defence	O
+League	O
+Tommy	O
+Robinson	O
+.	O
+”	O
+The	O
+British	O
+counter	O
+-	O
+jihad	O
+movement	O
+is	O
+thus	O
+swept	O
+into	O
+the	O
+same	O
+group	O
+of	O
+violent	B-PROP
+extremists	I-PROP
+as	O
+Osborne	O
+,	O
+because	O
+Ganesh	B-PROP
+“	I-PROP
+knows	I-PROP
+”	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+encouraged	I-PROP
+him	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+The	O
+BBC	O
+broadcast	O
+was	O
+the	O
+drama	O
+based	O
+on	O
+real	O
+life	O
+,	O
+Three	O
+Girls	O
+,	O
+which	O
+showed	O
+real	O
+-	O
+life	O
+events	O
+of	O
+three	O
+of	O
+the	O
+(	O
+very	O
+many	O
+)	O
+victims	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Rochdale	O
+Muslim	O
+rape	O
+gangs	O
+.	O
+
+Ganesh	O
+somehow	O
+knows	O
+precisely	O
+what	O
+went	O
+on	O
+in	O
+Osborne	O
+’s	O
+mind	O
+.	O
+
+Rather	O
+than	O
+thinking	O
+that	O
+it	O
+was	O
+outrage	O
+at	O
+the	O
+behavior	O
+of	O
+the	O
+gangs	O
+of	O
+Muslim	O
+men	O
+of	O
+Pakistani	O
+background	O
+who	O
+abused	O
+the	O
+girls	O
+portrayed	O
+in	O
+Three	O
+Girls	O
+that	O
+caused	O
+Osborne	O
+to	O
+lose	O
+his	O
+mind	O
+and	O
+commit	O
+his	O
+terrible	O
+crime	O
+,	O
+Ganesh	O
+blames	O
+Obsorne	O
+’s	O
+act	O
+on	O
+the	O
+likes	O
+of	O
+Tommy	O
+Robinson	O
+.	O
+
+Yet	O
+Robinson	O
+explicitly	O
+fights	O
+AGAINST	O
+political	O
+violence	O
+.	O
+
+What	O
+“	O
+narrative	O
+from	O
+British	O
+counter	O
+-	O
+jihad	O
+groups	O
+”	O
+can	O
+one	O
+find	O
+which	O
+suggests	O
+driving	O
+vehicles	O
+into	O
+innocent	O
+Muslims	O
+standing	O
+outside	O
+a	O
+mosque	O
+?	O
+
+I	O
+’m	O
+sure	O
+if	O
+there	O
+was	O
+any	O
+,	O
+Ganesh	O
+would	O
+,	O
+as	O
+a	O
+researcher	O
+at	O
+an	O
+elite	O
+institution	O
+,	O
+be	O
+able	O
+to	O
+find	O
+it	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+there	O
+is	O
+none	O
+offered	O
+–	O
+only	O
+surmise	O
+and	O
+Ganesh	O
+’s	O
+mindreading	O
+techniques	O
+.	O
+
+I	B-PROP
+suppose	I-PROP
+if	I-PROP
+you	I-PROP
+’re	I-PROP
+paid	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+fight	I-PROP
+online	I-PROP
+extremism	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+you	I-PROP
+’d	I-PROP
+better	I-PROP
+find	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+or	I-PROP
+you	I-PROP
+’re	I-PROP
+out	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+job	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+short	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+academic	I-PROP
+publication	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+We	O
+have	O
+also	O
+the	O
+ridiculous	B-PROP
+idea	O
+that	O
+Tommy	O
+Robinson	O
+is	O
+“	O
+alt	B-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+right	I-PROP
+.	O
+”	O
+He	O
+,	O
+in	O
+fact	O
+,	O
+describes	O
+himself	O
+as	O
+a	O
+centrist	O
+–	O
+he	O
+’s	O
+said	O
+he	O
+agrees	O
+with	O
+Labour	O
+on	O
+some	O
+things	O
+,	O
+the	O
+Tories	O
+on	O
+other	O
+things	O
+,	O
+and	O
+he	O
+left	O
+the	O
+EDL	O
+precisely	O
+because	O
+he	O
+did	O
+n’t	O
+like	O
+the	O
+infiltration	O
+by	O
+the	O
+far	O
+right	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+shows	O
+no	O
+hint	O
+of	O
+racism	O
+or	O
+of	O
+white	O
+supremacism	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+writer	O
+of	O
+this	O
+shoddy	B-PROP
+article	I-PROP
+is	O
+working	O
+at	O
+one	O
+of	O
+the	O
+most	O
+elite	O
+universities	O
+in	O
+the	O
+world	O
+,	O
+on	O
+research	O
+funded	O
+by	O
+the	O
+European	O
+Union	O
+,	O
+and	O
+giving	O
+advice	O
+based	O
+on	O
+this	O
+sloppy	B-PROP
+thinking	I-PROP
+to	O
+those	O
+who	O
+are	O
+in	O
+charge	O
+of	O
+manipulating	O
+and	O
+policing	O
+the	O
+communications	O
+and	O
+information	O
+we	O
+have	O
+online	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+have	O
+to	O
+ask	O
+.	O
+
+Is	B-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+simply	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+coincidence	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+Tommy	I-PROP
+Robinson	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+now	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+prison	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+“	I-PROP
+researcher	I-PROP
+”	I-PROP
+who	I-PROP
+presents	I-PROP
+such	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+misleading	I-PROP
+account	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+Robinson	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+currently	I-PROP
+actively	I-PROP
+engaged	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+consultation	I-PROP
+with	I-PROP
+Oxford	I-PROP
+University	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+European	I-PROP
+Union	I-PROP
+in	O
+advising	O
+how	O
+to	O
+disrupt	B-PROP
+Robinson	I-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+activities	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+reinforcing	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+lies	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+misrepresentations	I-PROP
+about	I-PROP
+him	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+those	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+power	I-PROP
+?	I-PROP
+
+There	B-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+more	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+Bharath	O
+Ganesh	O
+’s	O
+profile	O
+tells	O
+us	O
+this	O
+:	O
+“	O
+During	O
+his	O
+Ph.D.	O
+,	O
+Bharath	O
+was	O
+also	O
+a	O
+Senior	O
+Researcher	O
+at	O
+Tell	O
+MAMA	O
+,	O
+a	O
+national	O
+project	O
+dedicated	O
+to	O
+mapping	O
+and	O
+monitoring	O
+anti	O
+-	O
+Muslim	O
+hate	O
+in	O
+the	O
+United	O
+Kingdom	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+has	O
+given	O
+evidence	O
+in	O
+the	O
+Houses	O
+of	O
+Parliament	O
+on	O
+governance	O
+,	O
+extremism	O
+,	O
+gender	O
+,	O
+and	O
+hate	O
+crime	O
+and	O
+authored	O
+a	O
+number	O
+of	O
+reports	O
+in	O
+this	O
+area	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Is	B-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+simply	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+coincidence	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+this	I-PROP
+“	I-PROP
+researcher	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+”	I-PROP
+prior	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+coming	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+Oxford	I-PROP
+University	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+worked	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+Tell	I-PROP
+Mama	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+factory	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+production	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+bogus	I-PROP
+claims	I-PROP
+about	I-PROP
+Islamophobia	I-PROP
+?	I-PROP
+
+Who	B-PROP
+runs	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+Internet	I-PROP
+runs	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+world	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Is	O
+this	O
+a	O
+partnership	O
+between	O
+Europe	O
+’s	O
+governments	O
+,	O
+the	O
+Internet	O
+giants	O
+,	O
+and	O
+Islamic	O
+influence	O
+?	O
+
+Article	O
+posted	O
+with	O
+permission	O
+from	O
+Pamela	O
+Geller	O
+
+Geert	O
+Wilders	O
+Puts	O
+the	O
+Political	O
+Elites	O
+On	O
+Notice	O
+
+Geert	O
+Wilders	O
+spoke	O
+at	O
+a	O
+massive	O
+rally	O
+for	O
+Tommy	O
+Robinson	O
+on	O
+Saturday	O
+.	O
+
+20,000	O
+people	O
+came	O
+out	O
+to	O
+call	O
+for	O
+Tommy	O
+’s	O
+release	O
+,	O
+and	O
+Wilders	O
+took	O
+the	O
+opportunity	O
+to	O
+put	O
+the	O
+political	O
+elites	O
+of	O
+Britain	O
+and	O
+continental	O
+Europe	O
+on	O
+notice	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Our	B-PROP
+governments	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+”	I-PROP
+Wilders	I-PROP
+declared	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+“	I-PROP
+sold	I-PROP
+us	I-PROP
+out	I-PROP
+with	I-PROP
+mass	I-PROP
+immigration	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+With	B-PROP
+Islamization	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+With	O
+open	O
+borders	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+are	O
+almost	O
+foreigners	O
+in	O
+our	O
+own	O
+lands	O
+.	O
+
+And	O
+if	O
+we	O
+complain	O
+about	O
+it	O
+,	O
+they	O
+call	O
+us	O
+racists	O
+and	O
+Islamophobes	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+I	O
+say	O
+,	O
+no	O
+more	O
+!	O
+
+And	O
+what	O
+do	O
+you	O
+say	O
+?	O
+
+No	B-PROP
+more	I-PROP
+!	I-PROP
+
+And	O
+that	O
+’s	O
+right	O
+:	O
+enough	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+enough	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+We	B-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+not	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+gagged	I-PROP
+anymore	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+No	B-PROP
+more	I-PROP
+tyranny	I-PROP
+.	O
+”	O
+
+It	B-PROP
+was	I-PROP
+extraordinary	I-PROP
+that	O
+the	O
+British	O
+authorities	O
+allowed	O
+Wilders	O
+into	O
+the	O
+country	O
+at	O
+all	O
+.	O
+
+Several	O
+years	O
+ago	O
+he	O
+was	O
+banned	O
+from	O
+entering	O
+the	O
+country	O
+,	O
+but	O
+although	O
+the	O
+ban	O
+was	O
+reversed	O
+on	O
+appeal	O
+,	O
+the	O
+British	O
+government	O
+recently	O
+banned	O
+Martin	O
+Sellner	O
+,	O
+Brittany	O
+Pettibone	O
+,	O
+Lauren	O
+Southern	O
+and	O
+Lutz	O
+Bachmann	O
+from	O
+entering	O
+,	O
+all	B-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+crime	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+opposing	I-PROP
+jihad	I-PROP
+terror	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+Sharia	I-PROP
+oppression	I-PROP
+,	O
+and	O
+thereby	O
+made	O
+it	O
+clear	O
+that	O
+it	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+more	I-PROP
+authoritarian	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+unwilling	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+uphold	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+freedom	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+speech	I-PROP
+than	I-PROP
+ever	I-PROP
+–	O
+at	O
+least	O
+when	O
+it	O
+comes	O
+to	O
+criticism	O
+of	O
+Islam	O
+,	O
+Muslim	B-PROP
+rape	I-PROP
+gangs	I-PROP
+,	O
+and	O
+mass	O
+Muslim	O
+migration	O
+.	O
+
+Even	B-PROP
+worse	I-PROP
+,	O
+the	O
+bannings	O
+of	O
+Sellner	O
+,	O
+Pettibone	O
+,	O
+Southern	O
+,	O
+and	O
+Bachmann	O
+were	O
+just	O
+part	O
+of	O
+a	O
+long	O
+pattern	O
+.	O
+
+Pamela	O
+Geller	O
+and	O
+I	O
+were	O
+banned	O
+from	O
+entering	O
+Britain	O
+in	O
+2013	O
+,	O
+apparently	O
+for	O
+life	O
+,	O
+also	O
+for	B-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+crime	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+telling	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+truth	I-PROP
+about	I-PROP
+Islam	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+jihad	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Meanwhile	B-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+Britain	I-PROP
+has	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+steadily	I-PROP
+lengthening	I-PROP
+record	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+admitting	I-PROP
+jihad	I-PROP
+preachers	I-PROP
+without	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+moment	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+hesitation	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Syed	O
+Muzaffar	O
+Shah	O
+Qadri	O
+’s	O
+preaching	B-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+hatred	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+jihad	I-PROP
+violence	I-PROP
+was	O
+so	O
+hardline	O
+that	O
+he	O
+was	O
+banned	O
+from	O
+preaching	O
+in	O
+Pakistan	O
+,	O
+but	O
+the	O
+UK	O
+Home	O
+Office	O
+welcomed	O
+him	O
+into	O
+Britain	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+UK	O
+Home	O
+Office	O
+also	O
+admitted	O
+Shaykh	O
+Hamza	O
+Sodagar	O
+into	O
+the	O
+country	O
+,	O
+despite	O
+the	O
+fact	O
+that	O
+he	O
+has	O
+said	O
+:	O
+“	O
+If	B-PROP
+there	I-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+homosexual	I-PROP
+men	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+punishment	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+one	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+five	I-PROP
+things	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+One	B-PROP
+–	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+easiest	I-PROP
+one	I-PROP
+maybe	I-PROP
+–	I-PROP
+chop	I-PROP
+their	I-PROP
+head	I-PROP
+off	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+easiest	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+Second	B-PROP
+–	I-PROP
+burn	I-PROP
+them	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+death	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+Third	B-PROP
+–	I-PROP
+throw	I-PROP
+’em	I-PROP
+off	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+cliff	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+Fourth	B-PROP
+–	I-PROP
+tear	I-PROP
+down	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+wall	I-PROP
+on	I-PROP
+them	I-PROP
+so	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+die	I-PROP
+under	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+Fifth	B-PROP
+–	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+combination	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+above	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+”	I-PROP
+
+Theresa	O
+May	O
+’s	O
+relentlessly	B-PROP
+appeasement	I-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+minded	I-PROP
+government	I-PROP
+also	O
+admitted	O
+two	O
+jihad	O
+preachers	O
+who	O
+had	O
+praised	O
+the	O
+murderer	O
+of	O
+a	O
+foe	O
+of	O
+Pakistan	O
+’s	O
+blasphemy	O
+laws	O
+.	O
+
+One	O
+of	O
+them	O
+was	O
+welcomed	O
+by	O
+the	O
+Archbishop	O
+of	O
+Canterbury	O
+.	O
+
+Meanwhile	O
+,	O
+the	B-PROP
+UK	I-PROP
+banned	I-PROP
+three	I-PROP
+bishops	I-PROP
+from	I-PROP
+areas	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+Iraq	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+Syria	I-PROP
+where	I-PROP
+Christians	I-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+persecuted	I-PROP
+from	I-PROP
+entering	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+country	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+But	O
+now	O
+matters	O
+are	O
+coming	O
+to	O
+a	O
+head	O
+.	O
+
+Apparently	O
+British	O
+authorities	O
+decided	O
+that	O
+it	O
+would	O
+be	O
+too	O
+politically	O
+costly	O
+for	O
+them	O
+to	O
+bar	O
+Wilders	O
+again	O
+.	O
+
+And	O
+so	O
+he	O
+entered	O
+,	O
+and	O
+spoke	O
+,	O
+and	O
+gave	O
+them	O
+a	O
+strong	B-PROP
+dose	I-PROP
+of	O
+the	O
+reality	O
+that	O
+they	O
+are	O
+determined	O
+to	O
+ignore	O
+and	O
+deny	O
+.	O
+
+Tommy	O
+Robinson	O
+is	O
+in	O
+prison	O
+today	O
+because	O
+he	O
+violated	O
+a	O
+court	O
+order	O
+demanding	O
+that	O
+he	O
+not	O
+film	O
+videos	O
+outside	O
+the	O
+trials	O
+of	O
+Muslim	B-PROP
+rape	B-PROP
+gangs	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Clearly	B-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+government	I-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+intent	I-PROP
+was	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+make	I-PROP
+sure	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+as	I-PROP
+few	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+as	I-PROP
+possible	I-PROP
+discovered	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+truth	I-PROP
+about	I-PROP
+its	I-PROP
+massive	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+years	I-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+long	I-PROP
+cover	I-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+up	I-PROP
+of	O
+those	O
+rape	O
+gangs	O
+,	O
+and	O
+refusal	O
+to	O
+prosecute	O
+the	O
+perpetrators	O
+.	O
+
+Theresa	B-PROP
+May	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+company	I-PROP
+obvious	I-PROP
+hope	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+other	I-PROP
+Britons	I-PROP
+who	I-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+furious	I-PROP
+about	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+sacrifice	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+thousands	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+British	I-PROP
+girls	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+idols	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+“	I-PROP
+diversity	I-PROP
+”	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+“	I-PROP
+multiculturalism	I-PROP
+”	I-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+see	I-PROP
+what	I-PROP
+happened	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+Tommy	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+frightened	I-PROP
+into	I-PROP
+silence	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+The	O
+British	O
+government	O
+,	O
+in	O
+imprisoning	O
+Tommy	O
+Robinson	O
+,	O
+has	O
+shown	O
+itself	O
+willing	O
+to	O
+incarcerate	O
+people	O
+for	O
+having	O
+opinions	O
+that	O
+it	O
+considers	O
+unacceptable	O
+.	O
+
+That	O
+heralds	O
+the	B-PROP
+death	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+Britain	I-PROP
+as	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+free	I-PROP
+society	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+beginning	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+an	I-PROP
+authoritarian	I-PROP
+police	I-PROP
+state	I-PROP
+there	I-PROP
+,	O
+unless	O
+this	O
+slide	O
+to	O
+totalitarianism	O
+is	O
+stopped	O
+now	O
+.	O
+
+British	B-PROP
+public	I-PROP
+figures	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+whatever	I-PROP
+criticism	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+have	I-PROP
+leveled	I-PROP
+against	I-PROP
+Tommy	I-PROP
+Robinson	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+past	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+should	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+calling	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+him	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+freed	I-PROP
+today	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+or	I-PROP
+else	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+exposing	I-PROP
+themselves	I-PROP
+as	I-PROP
+supporting	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+degeneration	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+Britain	I-PROP
+into	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+police	I-PROP
+state	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+Wilders	O
+addressed	O
+this	O
+endeavor	O
+head	O
+-	O
+on	O
+,	O
+declaring	O
+:	O
+“	O
+We	B-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+not	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+silenced	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+We	O
+will	O
+not	O
+be	O
+intimidated	O
+.	O
+
+And	O
+we	O
+tell	O
+the	O
+governments	O
+,	O
+we	O
+are	O
+not	O
+afraid	O
+of	O
+you	O
+.	O
+
+We	B-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+never	I-PROP
+surrender	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+We	O
+will	O
+stand	O
+strong	O
+and	O
+do	O
+our	O
+duty	O
+.	O
+
+We	B-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+defend	I-PROP
+our	I-PROP
+civilization	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+And	O
+we	O
+will	O
+protect	O
+our	O
+people	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Wilders	O
+added	O
+:	O
+“	O
+And	O
+I	O
+tell	O
+you	O
+,	O
+to	O
+the	O
+governments	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+can	O
+throw	O
+us	O
+in	O
+jail	O
+,	O
+but	O
+you	O
+will	O
+never	O
+defeat	O
+us	O
+.	O
+
+Because	O
+,	O
+my	B-PROP
+friends	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+every	I-PROP
+Tommy	I-PROP
+whom	I-PROP
+you	I-PROP
+imprison	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+thousands	I-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+rise	I-PROP
+up	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+So	O
+take	O
+notice	O
+,	O
+Theresa	O
+May.	O
+
+Take	O
+notice	O
+,	O
+Dutch	O
+Prime	O
+Minister	O
+Rutte	O
+.	O
+
+Take	O
+notice	O
+,	O
+Mrs.	O
+Merkel	O
+or	O
+President	O
+Macron	O
+.	O
+
+Take	O
+notice	O
+:	O
+the	B-PROP
+future	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+ours	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+not	I-PROP
+yours	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+We	B-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+defeat	O
+you	O
+politically	O
+,	O
+because	O
+we	B-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+my	I-PROP
+friends	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+we	I-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+.	O
+”	O
+
+If	B-PROP
+Wilders	I-PROP
+’	I-PROP
+words	I-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+n’t	I-PROP
+prove	I-PROP
+true	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+because	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+death	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+free	I-PROP
+societies	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+Britain	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+Western	I-PROP
+Europe	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+truly	I-PROP
+at	I-PROP
+hand	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+[	O
+Photo	O
+by	O
+Jan	O
+Kranendonk	O
+]	O
+
+#	O
+FreeTommy	O
+Robinson	O
+Rally	O
+Draws	O
+Tens	O
+Of	O
+Thousands	O
+
+This	O
+weekend	O
+,	O
+the	O
+#	O
+FreeTommy	O
+Robinson	O
+rally	O
+drew	O
+upwards	O
+of	O
+20,000	O
+supporters	O
+,	O
+according	O
+to	O
+organizers	O
+,	O
+in	O
+support	O
+of	O
+the	B-PROP
+outspoken	I-PROP
+critic	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+Islam	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+exposer	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+their	I-PROP
+crimes	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+his	I-PROP
+country	I-PROP
+and	O
+against	O
+his	O
+tyrannical	B-PROP
+arrest	O
+and	O
+imprisonment	O
+.	O
+
+Among	O
+those	O
+in	O
+attendance	O
+at	O
+the	O
+Saturday	O
+rally	O
+in	O
+London	O
+outside	O
+Downing	O
+Street	O
+were	O
+UKIP	O
+leader	O
+Gerard	O
+Batten	O
+,	O
+For	O
+Britain	O
+leader	O
+Anne	O
+Marie	O
+Waters	O
+,	O
+former	O
+Breitbart	O
+London	O
+editor	O
+-	O
+in	O
+-	O
+chief	O
+Raheem	O
+Kassam	O
+and	O
+Dutch	O
+opposition	O
+leader	O
+Geert	O
+Wilders	O
+.	O
+
+Wilders	O
+,	O
+who	O
+had	O
+been	O
+banned	O
+from	O
+entering	O
+the	O
+UK	O
+,	O
+tweeted	O
+out	O
+his	O
+support	O
+of	O
+Tommy	O
+Robinson	O
+prior	O
+to	O
+speaking	O
+to	O
+those	O
+in	O
+attendance	O
+.	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+
+Whom	O
+do	O
+you	O
+consider	O
+to	O
+be	O
+the	O
+most	O
+corrupt	O
+Democrat	O
+Politician	O
+?	O
+
+Whom	O
+do	O
+you	O
+consider	O
+to	O
+be	O
+the	O
+most	O
+corrupt	O
+Democrat	O
+Politician	O
+?	O
+
+Whom	O
+do	O
+you	O
+consider	O
+to	O
+be	O
+the	O
+most	O
+corrupt	O
+Democrat	O
+Politician	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+Dianne	O
+Feinstein	O
+Maxine	O
+Waters	O
+Adam	O
+Schiff	O
+Chuck	O
+Schumer	O
+Kamala	O
+Harris	O
+Kirsten	O
+Gillibrand	O
+Keith	O
+Ellison	O
+Cory	O
+Booker	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Name	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Freedom	O
+Outpost	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+So	O
+proud	O
+to	O
+support	O
+Tommy	O
+Robinson	O
+and	O
+free	O
+speech	O
+in	O
+London	O
+today	O
+.	O
+
+Fantastic	O
+crowd	O
+!	O
+"	O
+
+Wilders	O
+tweeted	O
+.	O
+
+So	O
+proud	O
+to	O
+support	O
+Tommy	O
+Robinson	O
+and	O
+free	O
+speech	O
+in	O
+London	O
+today	O
+.	O
+
+Fantastic	O
+crowd	O
+!	O
+
+London	O
+:	O
+Massive	O
+Crowds	O
+Gather	O
+to	O
+Hear	O
+Geert	O
+Wilders	O
+Demand	O
+Tommy	O
+Robinson	O
+'s	O
+Release	O
+https://t.co/VIddLmcZx9	O
+via	O
+@BreitbartNews	O
+—	O
+Geert	O
+Wilders	O
+(	O
+@geertwilderspvv	O
+)	O
+June	O
+9	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+In	O
+his	O
+speech	O
+,	O
+he	O
+encouraged	O
+those	O
+listening	O
+that	O
+they	O
+were	O
+not	O
+alone	O
+,	O
+and	O
+said	O
+the	O
+gathering	O
+of	O
+the	O
+people	O
+was	O
+meant	O
+to	O
+be	O
+a	O
+voice	O
+to	O
+the	O
+UK	O
+government	O
+to	O
+"	O
+Free	O
+Tommy	O
+Robinson	O
+!	O
+"	O
+
+Batten	O
+echoed	O
+that	O
+sentiment	O
+saying	O
+,	O
+“	O
+Tommy	B-PROP
+Robinson	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+political	I-PROP
+prisoner	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+"	I-PROP
+
+“	O
+Whatever	O
+the	O
+legal	O
+technicalities	O
+of	O
+his	O
+alleged	O
+contempt	O
+of	O
+court	O
+,	O
+he	B-PROP
+was	I-PROP
+imprisoned	O
+more	O
+for	O
+who	O
+he	O
+is	O
+and	O
+what	O
+he	O
+says	O
+rather	O
+than	O
+what	O
+he	O
+is	O
+supposed	O
+to	O
+have	O
+done	O
+.	O
+,	O
+"	O
+he	O
+added	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+It	O
+’s	O
+not	O
+necessary	O
+to	O
+agree	O
+with	O
+everything	O
+he	O
+says	O
+,	O
+it	O
+’s	O
+not	O
+necessary	O
+to	O
+approve	O
+of	O
+everything	O
+he	O
+does	O
+,	O
+but	O
+history	O
+will	O
+judge	O
+him	O
+as	O
+being	O
+on	B-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+right	I-PROP
+side	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+struggle	I-PROP
+between	I-PROP
+good	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+evil	I-PROP
+,	O
+”	O
+Batten	O
+continued	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+then	O
+went	O
+on	O
+to	B-PROP
+blast	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+policies	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+UK	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+truly	I-PROP
+harming	I-PROP
+their	I-PROP
+own	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+,	O
+specifically	O
+“	O
+widespread	B-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+organized	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+paedophile	I-PROP
+rape	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+little	I-PROP
+girls	I-PROP
+by	I-PROP
+organized	I-PROP
+gangs	I-PROP
+”	O
+while	O
+those	B-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+authority	I-PROP
+“	B-PROP
+brush	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+under	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+carpet	I-PROP
+.	O
+”	O
+
+“	O
+Governments	B-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+this	I-PROP
+country	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+across	I-PROP
+Europe	I-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+now	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+enemies	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+their	I-PROP
+own	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+[	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+]	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+promote	I-PROP
+policies	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+against	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+interests	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+their	I-PROP
+own	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+,	O
+”	O
+he	O
+railed	O
+—	O
+citing	O
+efforts	O
+to	O
+sabotage	O
+Brexit	O
+,	O
+uncontrolled	O
+mass	O
+migration	O
+,	O
+and	O
+what	O
+he	O
+described	O
+as	O
+“	O
+Islamisation	O
+”	O
+in	O
+particular	O
+,	O
+"	O
+he	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+A	B-PROP
+literalist	I-PROP
+interpretation	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+Mohammedan	I-PROP
+cult	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+completely	I-PROP
+alien	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+everything	I-PROP
+our	I-PROP
+country	I-PROP
+stands	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+our	I-PROP
+traditional	I-PROP
+way	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+life	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+"	O
+Batten	O
+continued	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+And	B-PROP
+yet	I-PROP
+instead	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+opposing	I-PROP
+Islamisation	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+our	I-PROP
+government	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+submitting	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+surrendering	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+They	B-PROP
+have	I-PROP
+betrayed	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+British	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+"	O
+
+“	O
+Now	O
+,	O
+‘	O
+Islam	O
+’	O
+means	O
+‘	O
+Submission	O
+’	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+either	O
+submit	O
+,	O
+or	O
+you	O
+resist	O
+.	O
+
+Are	O
+you	O
+going	O
+to	O
+submit	O
+?	O
+”	O
+he	O
+asked	O
+the	O
+crowds	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Are	O
+you	O
+going	O
+to	O
+resist	O
+?	O
+”	O
+
+The	O
+crowd	O
+shouted	O
+back	O
+their	O
+support	O
+of	O
+resisting	O
+and	O
+not	O
+submitting	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Islamization	O
+of	O
+their	O
+culture	O
+.	O
+
+Sharia	O
+Watch	O
+founder	O
+Anne	O
+Marie	O
+Waters	O
+also	O
+spoke	O
+at	O
+the	O
+rally	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Our	O
+leaders	O
+,	O
+our	B-PROP
+media	O
+,	O
+our	O
+police	O
+,	O
+all	O
+prioritize	O
+Islam	O
+in	O
+their	O
+decision	O
+-	O
+making	O
+,	O
+”	O
+she	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Why	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+so	I-PROP
+easy	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+our	I-PROP
+state	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+jail	I-PROP
+Tommy	I-PROP
+Robinson	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+when	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+so	I-PROP
+difficult	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+jail	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+group	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+men	I-PROP
+found	I-PROP
+with	I-PROP
+an	O
+underage	O
+girl	O
+in	O
+a	O
+bedroom	O
+?	O
+
+Why	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+so	I-PROP
+much	I-PROP
+easier	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+jail	I-PROP
+Tommy	I-PROP
+Robinson	I-PROP
+?	I-PROP
+
+“	O
+Why	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+so	I-PROP
+easy	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+jail	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+man	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+leaving	I-PROP
+bacon	I-PROP
+at	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+mosque	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+but	I-PROP
+so	I-PROP
+difficult	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+jail	I-PROP
+jihadis	I-PROP
+who	I-PROP
+preach	I-PROP
+murder	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+death	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+British	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+?	O
+"	O
+
+she	O
+continued	O
+in	O
+a	O
+line	O
+of	O
+questioning	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Why	O
+is	O
+it	O
+so	O
+easy	O
+for	O
+judges	O
+to	O
+make	O
+rulings	O
+that	O
+allow	O
+known	B-PROP
+terrorists	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+jihadists	I-PROP
+to	O
+stay	O
+in	O
+our	B-PROP
+country	I-PROP
+?	O
+
+Why	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+British	I-PROP
+government	I-PROP
+allowing	I-PROP
+ISIS	I-PROP
+fighters	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+return	I-PROP
+from	I-PROP
+Syria	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+threaten	I-PROP
+our	I-PROP
+safety	I-PROP
+?	I-PROP
+
+“	O
+Why	O
+do	O
+we	O
+talk	O
+and	O
+investigate	O
+and	O
+get	O
+angry	O
+about	O
+an	O
+accidental	O
+fire	O
+in	O
+Grenfell	O
+,	O
+but	O
+are	O
+expected	O
+to	O
+immediately	O
+forget	O
+—	O
+or	O
+‘	O
+not	O
+look	O
+back	O
+in	O
+anger	O
+’	O
+—	O
+about	O
+the	O
+deliberate	B-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+ideology	I-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+driven	I-PROP
+murder	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+British	I-PROP
+children	I-PROP
+?	O
+"	O
+
+Waters	O
+went	O
+on	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+And	O
+why	O
+are	O
+Muslims	O
+allowed	O
+to	O
+cover	O
+their	O
+faces	O
+with	O
+a	O
+black	O
+sack	O
+while	O
+the	O
+rest	O
+of	O
+us	O
+are	O
+subject	O
+to	O
+strict	O
+security	O
+?	O
+
+Why	B-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+children	I-PROP
+being	I-PROP
+mutilated	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+forcefully	I-PROP
+raped	I-PROP
+while	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+law	I-PROP
+looks	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+other	I-PROP
+way	I-PROP
+?	O
+
+Forcefully	B-PROP
+married	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+child	I-PROP
+married	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+while	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+law	I-PROP
+looks	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+other	I-PROP
+way	I-PROP
+?	I-PROP
+
+Why	O
+?	O
+
+Why	B-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+animals	I-PROP
+slaughtered	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+agony	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+terror	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+Halal	I-PROP
+imposed	I-PROP
+on	I-PROP
+all	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+us	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+country	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+has	I-PROP
+legislated	I-PROP
+against	I-PROP
+unstunned	I-PROP
+slaughter	I-PROP
+?	O
+
+Why	O
+?	O
+"	O
+
+“	O
+Why	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+so	I-PROP
+easy	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+Theresa	I-PROP
+May	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+jail	I-PROP
+Tommy	I-PROP
+Robinson	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+but	I-PROP
+so	I-PROP
+difficult	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+anything	I-PROP
+at	I-PROP
+all	I-PROP
+about	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+monstrous	I-PROP
+crimes	I-PROP
+committed	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+name	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+Islam	I-PROP
+all	I-PROP
+over	I-PROP
+this	I-PROP
+country	I-PROP
+every	I-PROP
+day	I-PROP
+?	O
+
+Why	O
+?	O
+”	O
+Waters	O
+asked	O
+.	O
+
+Well	O
+,	O
+the	O
+questions	O
+are	O
+obviously	O
+rhetorical	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+know	O
+why	O
+.	O
+
+The	B-PROP
+UK	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+frightened	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+Islamists	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+by	I-PROP
+being	I-PROP
+frightened	I-PROP
+into	I-PROP
+submission	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+being	I-PROP
+complicit	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+crimes	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+devout	I-PROP
+Muslims	I-PROP
+there	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+My	O
+speech	O
+at	O
+the	O
+#	O
+FreeTommy	O
+protest	O
+yesterday	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+need	O
+answers	O
+to	O
+our	O
+questions	O
+,	O
+and	O
+we	O
+need	O
+an	O
+MP	O
+in	O
+Parliament	O
+who	O
+will	O
+ask	O
+them	O
+.	O
+
+https://t.co/Rxx13odSC8	O
+—	O
+Anne	O
+Marie	O
+Waters	O
+(	O
+@AMDWaters	O
+)	O
+June	O
+10	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+Kassam	O
+also	O
+spoke	O
+at	O
+the	O
+event	O
+,	O
+reminding	O
+supporters	O
+of	O
+what	O
+was	O
+happening	O
+all	O
+across	O
+Europe	O
+due	O
+the	O
+mass	O
+influx	O
+of	O
+Muslim	O
+migrants	O
+.	O
+
+Then	O
+he	O
+encouraged	O
+them	O
+with	O
+a	B-PROP
+piece	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+history	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+“	O
+I	O
+’m	O
+sure	O
+we	O
+have	O
+some	O
+American	B-PROP
+friends	I-PROP
+in	O
+the	O
+crowd	O
+,	O
+on	O
+stage	O
+,	O
+and	O
+watching	O
+at	O
+home	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Kassam	O
+concluded	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+You	O
+know	O
+there	O
+was	O
+a	O
+man	O
+called	O
+Paul	O
+Revere	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+rode	O
+through	O
+the	O
+night	O
+on	O
+his	O
+horse	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+said	O
+,	O
+‘	O
+The	B-PROP
+British	I-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+coming	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+British	I-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+coming	I-PROP
+!	O
+’	O
+Well	O
+,	O
+let	O
+you	O
+tell	O
+you	O
+something	O
+;	O
+we	O
+’re	O
+here	O
+today	O
+to	O
+say	O
+a	O
+similar	O
+thing	O
+:	O
+The	B-PROP
+British	I-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+coming	I-PROP
+back	I-PROP
+!	O
+”	O
+
+I	O
+do	O
+hope	O
+that	O
+is	O
+true	O
+,	O
+but	O
+unless	B-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+Brits	I-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+going	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+put	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+same	I-PROP
+kind	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+fear	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+their	I-PROP
+representatives	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+Muslims	I-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+doing	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+ca	I-PROP
+n't	I-PROP
+expect	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+what	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+want	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+What	B-PROP
+Britain	I-PROP
+needs	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+return	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+God	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+their	I-PROP
+forefathers	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+One	I-PROP
+Oliver	I-PROP
+Cromwell	I-PROP
+served	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+They	B-PROP
+need	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+fear	I-PROP
+Him	I-PROP
+more	I-PROP
+than	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+Islamic	I-PROP
+terrorists	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+rape	I-PROP
+gangs	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+Then	B-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+only	I-PROP
+then	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+render	I-PROP
+justice	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+Muslim	I-PROP
+criminals	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+rid	I-PROP
+their	I-PROP
+land	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+such	I-PROP
+public	I-PROP
+idolatry	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+protect	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+like	I-PROP
+Tommy	I-PROP
+Robinson	I-PROP
+who	I-PROP
+rightly	I-PROP
+tell	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+truth	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+Article	O
+posted	O
+with	O
+permission	O
+from	O
+Sons	O
+of	O
+Liberty	O
+Media	O
+
+Is	B-PROP
+President	I-PROP
+Trump	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+Traitor	I-PROP
+?	I-PROP
+
+The	O
+US	O
+Democratic	O
+Party	O
+is	O
+determined	O
+to	O
+take	B-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+world	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+thermo	I-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+nuclear	I-PROP
+war	I-PROP
+rather	O
+than	O
+to	O
+admit	O
+that	O
+Hillary	O
+Clinton	O
+lost	O
+the	O
+presidential	O
+election	O
+fair	O
+and	O
+square	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Democratic	O
+Party	O
+was	O
+totally	B-PROP
+corrupted	I-PROP
+by	O
+the	O
+Clinton	O
+Regime	O
+,	O
+and	O
+now	O
+it	O
+is	O
+totally	B-PROP
+insane	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Leaders	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Democratic	O
+Party	O
+,	O
+such	O
+as	O
+Nancy	O
+Pelosi	O
+and	O
+Chuck	O
+Schumer	O
+,	O
+my	O
+former	O
+co	O
+-	O
+author	O
+in	O
+the	O
+New	O
+York	O
+Times	O
+,	O
+have	O
+responded	O
+in	O
+a	O
+non	O
+-	O
+Democratic	O
+way	O
+to	O
+the	O
+first	O
+step	O
+President	O
+Trump	O
+has	O
+taken	O
+to	O
+reduce	O
+the	O
+extremely	B-PROP
+dangerous	I-PROP
+tensions	O
+with	O
+Russia	O
+that	O
+the	O
+Clinton	O
+,	O
+George	O
+W.	O
+Bush	O
+,	O
+and	O
+Obama	O
+regimes	O
+created	O
+between	O
+the	O
+two	O
+superpowers	O
+.	O
+
+Yes	O
+,	O
+Russia	O
+is	O
+a	O
+superpower	O
+.	O
+
+Russian	B-PROP
+weapons	I-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+so	B-PROP
+superior	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+junk	I-PROP
+produced	I-PROP
+by	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+waste	I-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+filled	I-PROP
+US	I-PROP
+military	I-PROP
+/	I-PROP
+security	I-PROP
+complex	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+lives	I-PROP
+high	I-PROP
+off	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+hog	I-PROP
+on	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+insouciant	I-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+taxpayer	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+questionable	I-PROP
+if	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+US	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+even	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+second	I-PROP
+class	I-PROP
+military	I-PROP
+power	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+If	B-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+insane	I-PROP
+neoconservatives	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+such	I-PROP
+as	I-PROP
+Max	I-PROP
+Boot	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+William	I-PROP
+Kristol	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+rest	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+neocon	I-PROP
+scum	I-PROP
+get	I-PROP
+their	I-PROP
+way	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+US	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+UK	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+Europe	I-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+radioactive	I-PROP
+ruin	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+thousands	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+years	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+House	O
+Democratic	O
+leader	O
+Nancy	O
+Pelosi	O
+(	O
+CA	O
+)	O
+,	O
+Minority	O
+Leader	O
+of	O
+the	O
+US	O
+House	O
+of	O
+Representatives	O
+,	O
+declared	O
+that	O
+out	O
+of	O
+fear	O
+of	O
+some	O
+undefined	O
+retribution	O
+from	O
+Putin	O
+,	O
+a	O
+dossier	O
+on	O
+Trump	O
+perhaps	O
+,	O
+the	B-PROP
+President	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+United	I-PROP
+States	I-PROP
+sold	I-PROP
+out	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+Russia	I-PROP
+because	O
+he	O
+wants	O
+to	O
+make	O
+peace	O
+:	O
+“	O
+It	O
+begs	O
+the	O
+question	O
+,	O
+what	O
+does	O
+Vladimir	O
+Putin	O
+,	O
+what	O
+do	O
+the	O
+Russians	O
+have	O
+on	O
+Donald	O
+Trump	O
+—	O
+personally	O
+,	O
+politically	O
+and	O
+financially	O
+that	O
+he	O
+should	O
+behave	O
+in	O
+such	O
+a	O
+manner	O
+?	O
+”	O
+The	O
+“	O
+such	O
+a	O
+manner	O
+”	O
+Pelosi	O
+is	O
+speaking	O
+about	O
+is	O
+making	O
+peace	O
+instead	O
+of	O
+war	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Tyranny	O
+of	O
+Good	O
+In	O
+...	O
+Paul	O
+Craig	O
+Roberts	O
+,	O
+La	O
+...	O
+Best	O
+Price	O
+:	O
+$	O
+5.64	O
+Buy	O
+New	O
+$	O
+5.00	O
+(	O
+as	O
+of	O
+10:35	O
+EDT	O
+-	O
+Details	O
+)	O
+
+To	O
+be	O
+clear	O
+,	O
+the	O
+Democratic	O
+Minority	O
+Leader	O
+of	O
+the	O
+US	O
+House	O
+of	O
+Representatives	O
+has	O
+accused	O
+Donald	O
+Trump	O
+of	O
+high	B-PROP
+treason	I-PROP
+against	O
+the	O
+United	O
+States	O
+.	O
+
+There	O
+is	O
+no	O
+outcry	O
+against	O
+this	O
+blatantly	B-PROP
+false	I-PROP
+accusation	I-PROP
+,	O
+totally	B-PROP
+devoid	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+evidence	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+The	O
+presstitute	O
+media	O
+instead	O
+of	O
+protesting	O
+this	O
+attempt	O
+at	O
+a	O
+coup	O
+against	O
+the	O
+President	O
+of	O
+the	O
+United	O
+States	O
+,	O
+trumpet	B-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+accusation	I-PROP
+as	I-PROP
+self	I-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+evident	I-PROP
+truth	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Trump	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+traitor	I-PROP
+because	I-PROP
+he	I-PROP
+wants	I-PROP
+peace	I-PROP
+with	I-PROP
+Russia	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+Here	O
+is	O
+Democratic	O
+Senator	O
+Chuck	O
+Schumer	O
+(	O
+NY	O
+)	O
+repeating	O
+Pelosi	O
+’s	O
+false	O
+accusation	O
+:	O
+“	O
+Millions	O
+of	O
+Americans	B-PROP
+will	O
+continue	O
+to	O
+wonder	O
+if	O
+the	B-PROP
+only	I-PROP
+possible	I-PROP
+explanation	I-PROP
+for	O
+this	O
+dangerous	B-PROP
+behavior	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+possibility	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+President	B-PROP
+Putin	I-PROP
+holds	I-PROP
+damaging	I-PROP
+information	I-PROP
+over	I-PROP
+President	I-PROP
+Trump	I-PROP
+.	O
+”	O
+If	B-PROP
+you	I-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+n’t	I-PROP
+believe	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+this	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+orchestrated	I-PROP
+between	I-PROP
+Pelosi	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+Schumer	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+you	I-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+stupid	I-PROP
+beyond	I-PROP
+belief	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Here	O
+is	O
+disgraced	B-PROP
+Obama	I-PROP
+CIA	I-PROP
+director	I-PROP
+John	O
+Brennan	O
+,	O
+a	O
+leader	O
+of	O
+the	O
+fake	B-PROP
+Russiagate	I-PROP
+campaign	I-PROP
+against	O
+President	O
+Trump	O
+in	O
+order	O
+to	O
+prevent	O
+Trump	O
+from	O
+making	O
+peace	O
+with	O
+Russia	O
+and	O
+,	O
+thus	O
+,	O
+by	O
+making	O
+the	O
+world	O
+safer	O
+,	O
+threatening	B-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+massive	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+unjustified	I-PROP
+budget	I-PROP
+of	O
+the	O
+military	O
+/	O
+security	O
+complex	O
+:	O
+“	O
+Donald	O
+Trump	O
+’s	O
+press	O
+conference	O
+performance	O
+in	O
+Helsinki	O
+rises	O
+to	O
+and	O
+exceeds	O
+the	O
+threshold	O
+of	O
+high	B-PROP
+crimes	I-PROP
+and	O
+misdemeanors	O
+.	O
+
+It	O
+was	O
+nothing	B-PROP
+short	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+treasonous	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Not	B-PROP
+only	I-PROP
+were	I-PROP
+Trump	I-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+comments	I-PROP
+imbecilic	B-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+he	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+wholly	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+pocket	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+Putin	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Republican	O
+Patriots	O
+:	O
+Where	O
+are	O
+you	O
+?	O
+?	O
+
+?	O
+”	O
+
+Here	O
+are	O
+many	O
+more	O
+.	O
+
+And	O
+here	O
+is	O
+more	O
+from	O
+the	O
+CIA	O
+bought	O
+-	O
+and	O
+-	O
+paid	O
+-	O
+for	O
+BBC	O
+.	O
+
+NOTICE	O
+THAT	O
+NOT	O
+ONE	O
+WESTERN	O
+MEDIA	O
+SOURCE	O
+IS	O
+CELEBRATING	O
+AND	O
+THANKING	O
+TRUMP	O
+AND	O
+PUTIN	O
+FOR	O
+EASING	O
+THE	O
+ARTIFICAILLY	B-PROP
+CREATED	O
+TENSIONS	O
+THAT	O
+WERE	O
+LEADING	O
+TO	O
+NUCLEAR	O
+WAR	O
+.	O
+
+HOW	O
+CAN	O
+THIS	O
+BE	O
+?	O
+
+HOW	B-PROP
+CAN	I-PROP
+IT	I-PROP
+BE	I-PROP
+THAT	I-PROP
+THE	I-PROP
+WESTERN	I-PROP
+MEDIA	I-PROP
+IS	I-PROP
+SO	I-PROP
+OPPOSED	I-PROP
+TO	I-PROP
+PEACE	I-PROP
+?	O
+
+WHAT	O
+IS	O
+THE	O
+EXPLANATION	O
+?	O
+
+The	O
+Russians	O
+,	O
+the	O
+Chinese	O
+,	O
+the	O
+Iranians	O
+,	O
+and	O
+the	O
+North	O
+Koreans	O
+,	O
+as	O
+well	O
+as	O
+the	O
+rest	O
+of	O
+the	O
+world	O
+,	O
+desperately	B-PROP
+need	O
+to	O
+notice	O
+the	O
+extremely	B-PROP
+hostile	I-PROP
+reaction	O
+to	O
+peace	O
+on	O
+the	O
+part	O
+of	O
+the	O
+US	O
+Democratic	O
+Party	O
+,	O
+many	O
+members	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Republican	O
+Party	O
+,	O
+including	O
+the	B-PROP
+despicable	I-PROP
+US	I-PROP
+Republican	I-PROP
+Senators	I-PROP
+John	O
+McCain	O
+and	O
+Lindsey	O
+Graham	O
+,	O
+and	O
+the	O
+Western	O
+Presstitute	O
+Media	O
+,	O
+a	O
+collection	O
+of	O
+people	O
+on	O
+the	O
+CIA	O
+payroll	O
+according	O
+to	O
+the	O
+German	O
+newspaper	O
+editor	O
+,	O
+Udo	O
+Ulfkotte	O
+,	O
+and	O
+the	O
+CIA	O
+itself	O
+.	O
+
+Nancy	O
+Pelosi	O
+,	O
+Chuck	O
+Schumer	O
+,	O
+John	O
+McCain	O
+,	O
+Lindsey	O
+Graham	O
+,	O
+and	O
+the	O
+rest	O
+of	O
+the	B-PROP
+corrupt	I-PROP
+filth	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+rules	I-PROP
+over	I-PROP
+us	I-PROP
+are	O
+all	O
+in	O
+the	O
+pay	O
+of	O
+the	O
+military	O
+/	O
+security	O
+complex	O
+.	O
+
+Just	O
+go	O
+and	O
+investigate	O
+the	O
+donations	O
+to	O
+their	O
+re	O
+-	O
+election	O
+campaigns	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+1,000	O
+billion	O
+dollar	O
+budget	O
+of	O
+the	O
+military	O
+/	O
+security	O
+complex	O
+,	O
+amplified	O
+by	O
+the	O
+CIA	O
+’s	O
+front	O
+corporations	O
+and	O
+narcotics	O
+business	O
+,	O
+provides	O
+enormous	O
+sums	O
+with	O
+which	O
+to	O
+purchase	O
+the	O
+senators	O
+and	O
+representatives	O
+that	O
+the	B-PROP
+insouciant	I-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+voters	I-PROP
+think	O
+that	O
+they	O
+elect	O
+.	O
+
+Do	O
+you	O
+know	O
+how	O
+large	O
+1,000	O
+billion	O
+is	O
+?	O
+
+You	O
+would	O
+have	O
+to	O
+live	O
+for	O
+thousands	O
+of	O
+years	O
+and	O
+do	O
+nothing	O
+for	O
+24/7	O
+except	O
+count	O
+to	O
+reach	O
+that	O
+figure	O
+.	O
+
+It	O
+is	O
+a	O
+sum	O
+that	O
+nurtures	O
+the	O
+recipients	O
+,	O
+and	O
+the	O
+recipients	O
+regard	O
+it	O
+as	O
+worth	O
+protecting	O
+.	O
+
+Therefore	B-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+public	I-PROP
+gets	I-PROP
+not	I-PROP
+representation	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+but	I-PROP
+lies	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+justify	I-PROP
+war	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+conflict	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+The	O
+military	O
+/	O
+security	O
+complex	O
+,	O
+about	O
+which	O
+President	O
+Eisenhower	O
+warned	O
+the	O
+American	O
+people	O
+to	O
+no	O
+effect	O
+,	O
+is	O
+in	O
+desperate	O
+need	O
+of	O
+an	O
+enemy	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+obedience	O
+to	O
+the	O
+military	O
+/	O
+security	O
+complex	O
+,	O
+the	O
+Clinton	O
+,	O
+George	O
+W.	O
+Bush	O
+,	O
+and	O
+Obama	O
+regimes	O
+have	O
+made	O
+Russia	O
+that	O
+enemy	O
+.	O
+
+If	B-PROP
+Trump	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+Putin	I-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+not	I-PROP
+understand	I-PROP
+this	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+easily	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+made	I-PROP
+irrelevant	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+They	B-PROP
+both	I-PROP
+can	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+assassinated	I-PROP
+,	O
+and	O
+that	O
+is	O
+what	O
+the	O
+statements	O
+from	O
+Pelosi	O
+,	O
+Schumer	O
+,	O
+McCain	O
+,	O
+Lindsey	O
+Graham	O
+,	O
+et	O
+.	O
+
+al	O
+.	O
+,	O
+repeated	O
+endlessly	O
+in	O
+the	B-PROP
+propaganda	I-PROP
+ministry	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+Western	I-PROP
+press	I-PROP
+,	O
+encourages	O
+.	O
+
+Trump	B-PROP
+can	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+assassinated	I-PROP
+or	I-PROP
+overthrown	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+political	I-PROP
+coup	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+selling	I-PROP
+out	I-PROP
+America	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+Russia	I-PROP
+,	O
+as	O
+members	O
+of	O
+both	O
+political	O
+parties	O
+claim	O
+and	O
+as	O
+the	O
+media	O
+trumpets	B-PROP
+endlessly	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Putin	O
+can	O
+be	O
+easily	O
+assassinated	O
+by	O
+the	O
+CIA	O
+operatives	O
+that	O
+the	O
+Russian	O
+government	B-PROP
+stupidly	I-PROP
+permits	I-PROP
+to	O
+operate	O
+throughout	O
+Russia	O
+in	O
+NGOs	O
+and	O
+Western	O
+/	O
+US	O
+owned	O
+media	O
+and	O
+among	O
+the	O
+Atlanticist	O
+Integrationists	O
+,	O
+Washington	O
+’s	O
+Firth	O
+Column	O
+inside	O
+Russia	O
+serving	O
+Washington	O
+’s	O
+purposes	O
+.	O
+
+These	B-PROP
+Russian	I-PROP
+traitors	I-PROP
+serve	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+Putin	I-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+own	I-PROP
+government	I-PROP
+!	O
+
+The	O
+Neoconservative	O
+Th	O
+...	O
+Dr.	O
+Paul	O
+Craig	O
+Roberts	O
+Best	O
+Price	O
+:	O
+$	O
+11.96	O
+Buy	O
+New	O
+$	O
+19.34	O
+(	O
+as	O
+of	O
+02:05	O
+EDT	O
+-	O
+Details	O
+)	O
+
+Americans	B-PROP
+are	O
+so	O
+unaware	O
+that	O
+they	O
+have	O
+no	O
+idea	O
+of	O
+the	O
+risk	O
+that	O
+President	O
+Trump	O
+is	O
+taking	O
+by	O
+challenging	O
+the	O
+US	O
+military	O
+security	O
+complex	O
+.	O
+
+For	O
+example	O
+,	O
+during	O
+the	O
+last	O
+half	O
+of	O
+the	O
+1970s	O
+I	O
+was	O
+a	O
+member	O
+of	O
+the	O
+US	O
+Senate	O
+staff	O
+.	O
+
+I	O
+was	O
+working	O
+together	O
+with	O
+a	O
+staffer	O
+of	O
+the	O
+US	O
+Republican	O
+Senator	O
+from	O
+California	O
+,	O
+S.	O
+I.	O
+Hayakawa	O
+,	O
+to	O
+advance	O
+understanding	O
+of	O
+a	O
+supply	O
+-	O
+side	O
+economic	O
+policy	O
+cure	O
+to	O
+the	O
+stagflation	O
+that	O
+threatened	O
+the	O
+US	O
+budget	O
+’s	O
+ability	O
+to	O
+meet	O
+its	O
+obligations	O
+.	O
+
+Republican	O
+Senators	O
+Hatch	O
+,	O
+Roth	O
+,	O
+and	O
+Hayakawa	O
+were	O
+trying	O
+to	O
+introduce	O
+a	O
+supply	O
+-	O
+side	O
+economic	O
+policy	O
+as	O
+a	O
+cure	O
+for	O
+the	O
+stagflation	B-PROP
+that	O
+was	O
+threatening	O
+the	O
+US	O
+economy	O
+with	O
+failure	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Democrats	O
+,	O
+who	O
+later	O
+in	O
+the	O
+Senate	O
+led	O
+the	O
+way	O
+to	O
+a	O
+supply	O
+-	O
+side	O
+policy	O
+,	O
+were	O
+,	O
+at	O
+this	O
+time	O
+,	O
+opposed	O
+(	O
+see	O
+Paul	O
+Craig	O
+Roberts	O
+,	O
+The	O
+Supply	O
+-	O
+Side	O
+Revolution	O
+,	O
+Harvard	O
+University	O
+Press	O
+,	O
+1984	O
+)	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Democrats	O
+claimed	O
+that	O
+the	O
+policy	O
+would	O
+worsen	O
+the	O
+budget	O
+deficit	O
+,	O
+the	B-PROP
+only	I-PROP
+time	O
+in	O
+those	O
+days	O
+Democrats	O
+cared	O
+about	O
+the	O
+budget	O
+deficit	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Democrats	O
+said	O
+that	O
+they	O
+would	O
+support	O
+the	O
+tax	O
+rate	O
+reductions	O
+if	O
+the	O
+Republicans	O
+would	O
+support	O
+offsetting	O
+cuts	O
+in	O
+the	O
+budget	O
+to	O
+support	O
+a	O
+balanced	O
+budget	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+was	O
+a	O
+ploy	O
+to	O
+put	O
+Republicans	O
+on	O
+the	O
+spot	O
+for	O
+taking	O
+away	O
+some	O
+groups	O
+’	O
+handouts	O
+in	O
+order	O
+“	O
+to	O
+cut	O
+tax	O
+rates	O
+for	O
+the	O
+rich	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+The	O
+supply	O
+-	O
+side	O
+policy	O
+did	O
+not	O
+require	O
+budget	O
+cuts	O
+,	O
+but	O
+in	O
+order	O
+to	O
+demonstrate	O
+the	O
+Democrats	O
+lack	O
+of	O
+sincerety	O
+,	O
+Hayakawa	O
+’s	O
+aid	O
+and	O
+I	O
+had	O
+our	O
+senators	O
+introduce	O
+a	O
+series	O
+of	O
+budget	O
+cuts	O
+together	O
+with	O
+tax	O
+cuts	O
+that	O
+,	O
+on	O
+a	O
+static	O
+revenue	O
+basis	O
+(	O
+not	O
+counting	O
+tax	O
+revenue	O
+feedbacks	O
+from	O
+the	O
+incentives	O
+of	O
+the	O
+lower	O
+tax	O
+rates	O
+)	O
+kept	O
+the	O
+budget	O
+even	O
+,	O
+and	O
+the	O
+Democrats	O
+voted	O
+against	O
+them	O
+every	O
+time	O
+.	O
+
+When	O
+the	O
+combination	O
+of	O
+tax	O
+cuts	O
+with	O
+defense	O
+budget	O
+cuts	O
+came	O
+up	O
+for	O
+a	O
+vote	O
+,	O
+the	O
+legendary	B-PROP
+senator	O
+Strom	O
+Thurmond	O
+,	O
+a	O
+48-year	O
+member	O
+of	O
+the	O
+US	O
+Senate	O
+from	O
+South	O
+Carolina	O
+,	O
+tapped	O
+me	O
+on	O
+the	O
+shoulder	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+said	O
+:	O
+“	O
+son	O
+,	O
+never	O
+set	O
+your	O
+senator	O
+up	O
+against	O
+the	O
+military	O
+/	O
+security	O
+complex	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+will	O
+not	O
+be	O
+re	O
+-	O
+elected	O
+,	O
+and	O
+you	O
+will	O
+be	O
+out	O
+of	O
+a	O
+job	O
+.	O
+”	O
+I	O
+replied	O
+that	O
+we	O
+were	O
+just	O
+establishing	O
+for	O
+the	O
+record	O
+that	O
+under	O
+no	O
+conditions	O
+would	O
+the	O
+Democrats	O
+,	O
+who	O
+wanted	O
+more	O
+government	O
+,	O
+vote	O
+for	O
+a	O
+tax	O
+rate	O
+reduction	O
+even	O
+if	O
+there	O
+was	O
+a	O
+case	O
+that	O
+it	O
+would	O
+cure	O
+stagflation	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+replied	O
+:	O
+“	O
+son	O
+,	O
+the	B-PROP
+military	I-PROP
+/	I-PROP
+security	I-PROP
+complex	I-PROP
+does	I-PROP
+n’t	I-PROP
+care	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+”	I-PROP
+
+My	O
+emergence	O
+from	O
+The	O
+Matrix	O
+began	O
+with	O
+Thurmond	O
+’s	O
+pat	O
+on	O
+my	O
+shoulder	O
+.	O
+
+It	O
+grew	O
+with	O
+my	O
+time	O
+at	O
+the	O
+Wall	O
+Street	O
+Journal	O
+when	O
+I	O
+learned	O
+that	O
+some	O
+truthful	O
+things	O
+simply	O
+could	O
+not	O
+be	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+the	O
+Treasury	O
+I	O
+experienced	O
+how	O
+those	O
+outside	O
+interests	O
+opposed	O
+to	O
+a	O
+president	O
+’s	O
+policy	O
+marshall	O
+their	O
+forces	O
+and	O
+the	O
+media	O
+that	O
+they	O
+own	O
+to	O
+block	O
+it	O
+.	O
+
+Later	O
+as	O
+a	O
+member	O
+of	O
+a	O
+secret	O
+presidential	O
+committee	O
+,	O
+I	O
+saw	O
+how	O
+the	O
+CIA	O
+attempted	O
+to	O
+prevent	O
+President	O
+Reagan	O
+from	O
+ending	O
+the	O
+Cold	O
+War	O
+.	O
+
+Today	O
+,	O
+right	O
+now	O
+,	O
+at	O
+this	O
+moment	O
+,	O
+we	O
+are	O
+faced	O
+with	O
+a	O
+massive	O
+effort	O
+of	O
+the	O
+military	O
+/	O
+security	O
+complex	O
+,	O
+the	O
+neoconservatives	O
+,	O
+the	O
+Democratic	O
+Party	O
+,	O
+and	O
+the	O
+presstitute	O
+media	O
+to	O
+discredit	O
+the	O
+elected	O
+President	O
+of	O
+the	O
+United	O
+States	O
+and	O
+to	O
+overthrow	O
+him	O
+in	O
+order	O
+that	O
+the	B-PROP
+utterly	I-PROP
+corrupt	I-PROP
+elite	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+rule	I-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+can	O
+continue	O
+to	O
+hold	O
+on	O
+to	O
+power	O
+and	O
+to	O
+protect	O
+the	O
+massive	O
+budget	O
+of	O
+the	O
+military	O
+/	O
+security	O
+complex	O
+that	O
+,	O
+along	O
+with	O
+the	O
+Israel	O
+Lobby	O
+,	O
+funds	O
+the	O
+elections	O
+of	O
+those	O
+who	O
+rule	O
+us	O
+.	O
+
+Trump	O
+,	O
+like	O
+Reagan	O
+,	O
+was	O
+an	O
+exception	O
+,	O
+and	O
+it	O
+is	O
+the	O
+exceptions	O
+that	O
+accumulate	O
+the	O
+ire	O
+of	O
+the	O
+corrupt	B-PROP
+leftwing	I-PROP
+,	O
+bought	O
+off	O
+with	O
+money	O
+,	O
+and	O
+the	O
+ire	O
+of	O
+the	O
+media	O
+,	O
+concentrated	O
+into	O
+small	O
+tight	O
+ownership	O
+groups	O
+indebted	O
+to	O
+those	O
+who	O
+permitted	O
+the	O
+illegal	O
+concentration	O
+of	O
+a	O
+once	O
+independent	O
+and	O
+diverse	O
+American	O
+media	O
+that	O
+once	O
+served	O
+,	O
+on	O
+occasion	O
+,	O
+as	O
+a	B-PROP
+watchdog	I-PROP
+over	I-PROP
+government	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+The	O
+rightwing	O
+,	O
+wrapped	O
+in	O
+the	O
+flag	O
+,	O
+dismisses	B-PROP
+all	O
+truth	O
+as	O
+“	O
+anti	B-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+”	I-PROP
+
+If	O
+Putin	O
+,	O
+Lavrov	O
+,	O
+the	O
+Russian	O
+government	O
+,	O
+the	O
+traitorous	B-PROP
+Russian	I-PROP
+Fifth	I-PROP
+Column	I-PROP
+—	O
+the	O
+Atlanticist	O
+Integrationists	O
+—	O
+the	O
+Chinese	O
+,	O
+the	O
+Iranians	O
+,	O
+the	O
+North	O
+Koreans	O
+think	O
+that	O
+any	B-PROP
+peace	I-PROP
+or	I-PROP
+consideration	I-PROP
+can	I-PROP
+come	I-PROP
+out	O
+of	O
+America	O
+,	O
+they	B-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+insane	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Their	B-PROP
+delusions	I-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+setting	I-PROP
+themselves	I-PROP
+up	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+destruction	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+There	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+no	I-PROP
+institution	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+America	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+government	I-PROP
+or	I-PROP
+private	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+can	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+trusted	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Any	B-PROP
+government	I-PROP
+or	I-PROP
+person	I-PROP
+who	I-PROP
+trusts	I-PROP
+America	I-PROP
+or	I-PROP
+any	I-PROP
+Western	I-PROP
+country	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+stupid	I-PROP
+beyond	I-PROP
+belief	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+The	B-PROP
+entire	I-PROP
+Russiagate	I-PROP
+hoax	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+an	I-PROP
+orchestration	I-PROP
+by	I-PROP
+the	O
+military	O
+/	O
+security	O
+complex	O
+,	O
+led	O
+by	O
+John	O
+Brennen	O
+,	O
+Comey	O
+,	O
+and	O
+Rosenstein	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+purpose	O
+is	O
+to	O
+discredit	O
+President	O
+trump	O
+for	O
+two	O
+reasons	O
+.	O
+
+One	O
+is	O
+to	O
+prevent	O
+any	O
+normalization	O
+of	O
+relations	O
+with	O
+Russia	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+other	O
+is	O
+to	O
+remove	O
+Trump	O
+’s	O
+agenda	O
+as	O
+an	O
+alternative	O
+to	O
+the	O
+agenda	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Democratic	O
+Party	O
+.	O
+
+How	B-PROP
+America	I-PROP
+Was	I-PROP
+Lost	I-PROP
+:	O
+...	O
+Dr.	O
+Paul	O
+Craig	O
+Roberts	O
+Best	O
+Price	O
+:	O
+$	O
+8.00	O
+Buy	O
+New	O
+$	O
+8.51	O
+(	O
+as	O
+of	O
+02:00	O
+EDT	O
+-	O
+Details	O
+)	O
+
+President	B-PROP
+Trump	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+almost	I-PROP
+powerless	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Putin	O
+,	O
+the	O
+Chinese	O
+,	O
+the	O
+Iranians	O
+,	O
+and	O
+the	O
+North	O
+Koreans	O
+should	O
+recognize	O
+this	O
+before	B-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+too	I-PROP
+late	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+them	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+President	O
+Trump	O
+can	O
+not	O
+fire	O
+and	O
+arrest	O
+for	O
+high	O
+treason	O
+Mueller	O
+and	O
+Rosenstein	O
+.	O
+
+And	O
+Trump	B-PROP
+can	I-PROP
+not	I-PROP
+indict	I-PROP
+Hillary	O
+for	O
+her	O
+numerous	B-PROP
+unquestionable	I-PROP
+crimes	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+plain	I-PROP
+view	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+everyone	I-PROP
+,	O
+or	O
+Comey	O
+or	O
+Brennan	O
+,	O
+who	O
+declares	O
+Trump	O
+“	O
+to	B-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+wholly	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+pocket	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+Putin	I-PROP
+,	O
+”	O
+for	O
+trying	O
+to	O
+overthrow	O
+the	B-PROP
+elected	I-PROP
+president	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+United	I-PROP
+States	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Trump	B-PROP
+can	I-PROP
+not	I-PROP
+have	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+Secret	I-PROP
+Service	I-PROP
+question	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+likes	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+Pelosi	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+Schumer	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+McCain	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+Lindsey	I-PROP
+Graham	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+false	I-PROP
+accusations	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+encourage	I-PROP
+assassination	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+President	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+United	I-PROP
+States	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+Trump	B-PROP
+can	I-PROP
+not	I-PROP
+even	I-PROP
+trust	I-PROP
+the	O
+Secret	O
+Service	O
+,	O
+which	O
+accumulated	O
+evidence	O
+suggests	O
+was	O
+complicit	O
+in	O
+the	O
+assassination	O
+of	O
+President	O
+John	O
+F.	O
+Kennedy	O
+and	O
+Robert	O
+Kennedy	O
+.	O
+
+If	O
+Putin	O
+and	O
+Lavrov	O
+,	O
+so	O
+anxious	O
+to	O
+be	O
+friends	O
+of	O
+Washington	O
+,	O
+let	O
+their	O
+guards	O
+down	O
+,	O
+they	B-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+history	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+As	O
+I	O
+said	O
+above	O
+,	O
+Russiagate	O
+is	O
+an	O
+orchestratration	O
+to	O
+prevent	O
+peace	O
+between	O
+the	O
+US	O
+and	O
+Russia	O
+.	O
+
+Leading	O
+military	O
+/	O
+security	O
+complex	O
+experts	O
+,	O
+including	O
+the	O
+person	O
+who	O
+provided	O
+the	O
+CIA	O
+’s	O
+daily	O
+briefing	O
+of	O
+the	O
+President	O
+of	O
+the	O
+United	O
+States	O
+for	O
+many	O
+years	O
+,	O
+and	O
+the	O
+person	O
+who	O
+devised	O
+the	O
+spy	O
+program	O
+for	O
+the	O
+National	O
+Security	O
+Agency	O
+,	O
+have	B-PROP
+proven	I-PROP
+conclusively	I-PROP
+that	O
+Russiagate	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+hoax	I-PROP
+designed	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+purpose	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+preventing	I-PROP
+President	I-PROP
+Trump	I-PROP
+from	I-PROP
+normalizing	I-PROP
+relations	I-PROP
+between	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+US	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+Russia	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+which	B-PROP
+has	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+power	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+destroy	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+entirety	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+Western	I-PROP
+World	I-PROP
+at	I-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Here	O
+is	O
+the	O
+report	O
+from	O
+the	O
+retired	O
+security	O
+professionals	O
+who	O
+,	O
+unlike	O
+those	O
+still	O
+in	O
+office	O
+,	O
+can	O
+not	O
+be	O
+fired	O
+and	O
+deprived	O
+of	O
+a	O
+careet	O
+for	O
+telling	O
+the	O
+truth	O
+.	O
+
+Here	O
+is	O
+what	O
+the	O
+clued	B-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+Russian	O
+Defense	O
+Minister	O
+Shoigu	O
+has	O
+to	O
+say	O
+about	O
+the	O
+aggressive	B-PROP
+actions	O
+of	O
+the	O
+West	O
+against	O
+the	O
+Russian	O
+homeland	O
+.	O
+
+If	B-PROP
+Putin	I-PROP
+does	I-PROP
+n’t	I-PROP
+listen	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+him	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+Russia	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+trash	I-PROP
+can	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+history	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Keep	O
+in	O
+mind	O
+that	O
+no	B-PROP
+media	I-PROP
+informs	I-PROP
+you	O
+better	O
+than	O
+my	O
+website	O
+.	O
+
+If	O
+my	O
+website	O
+goes	O
+down	O
+,	O
+you	O
+will	O
+be	O
+left	O
+in	O
+darkness	O
+.	O
+
+No	O
+valid	O
+information	O
+comes	O
+from	O
+the	O
+US	O
+government	O
+or	O
+the	O
+Western	O
+presstitutes	O
+.	O
+
+If	B-PROP
+you	I-PROP
+sit	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+front	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+TV	I-PROP
+screen	I-PROP
+watching	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+Western	I-PROP
+media	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+you	I-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+brainwashed	I-PROP
+beyond	I-PROP
+all	I-PROP
+hope	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Not	O
+even	O
+I	O
+can	O
+rescue	O
+you	O
+.	O
+
+Nor	B-PROP
+God	I-PROP
+himself	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Americans	B-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+indeed	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+Russians	I-PROP
+themselves	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+incapable	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+realizing	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+,	O
+but	O
+there	O
+is	O
+a	O
+chance	O
+that	O
+Trump	O
+will	O
+be	O
+overthrown	O
+and	O
+a	O
+Western	O
+assault	O
+will	O
+be	O
+launched	O
+against	O
+the	O
+handful	O
+of	O
+countries	O
+that	O
+insist	O
+on	O
+sovereignty	O
+.	O
+
+I	O
+doubt	O
+that	O
+few	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Americans	B-PROP
+who	O
+elected	O
+Trump	O
+will	O
+be	O
+taken	O
+in	O
+by	O
+the	O
+anti	O
+-	O
+Trump	O
+propagana	O
+,	O
+but	O
+they	O
+are	O
+not	O
+organized	O
+and	O
+have	O
+no	O
+armed	O
+power	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+police	O
+,	O
+militarized	O
+by	O
+George	O
+W.	O
+Bush	O
+and	O
+Obama	O
+,	O
+will	O
+be	O
+set	O
+against	O
+them	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+rebellions	O
+will	O
+be	O
+local	O
+and	O
+suppressed	O
+by	O
+every	O
+violation	O
+of	O
+the	O
+US	O
+Constitution	O
+by	O
+the	O
+private	O
+powers	O
+that	O
+rule	O
+Washington	O
+,	O
+as	O
+always	O
+has	O
+been	O
+the	O
+case	O
+with	O
+rebellions	O
+in	O
+America	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+the	O
+West	O
+,	O
+which	O
+the	B-PROP
+Russians	I-PROP
+are	O
+so	O
+anxious	O
+to	O
+join	O
+,	O
+all	B-PROP
+freedoms	I-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+dead	I-PROP
+—	O
+freedom	O
+of	O
+assembly	O
+,	O
+freedom	O
+of	O
+speech	O
+,	O
+freedom	O
+of	O
+association	O
+,	O
+freedom	O
+of	O
+inquiry	O
+,	O
+freedom	O
+of	O
+privacy	O
+,	O
+freedom	O
+from	O
+arbitrary	O
+search	O
+,	O
+freedom	O
+from	O
+arbitrary	O
+arrest	O
+,	O
+along	O
+with	O
+the	O
+Constitutional	O
+protections	O
+of	O
+due	O
+process	O
+and	O
+habeas	O
+corpus	O
+.	O
+
+Today	O
+there	O
+are	O
+no	B-PROP
+countries	I-PROP
+less	I-PROP
+free	I-PROP
+than	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+United	I-PROP
+States	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+America	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Why	O
+do	O
+the	O
+Russian	O
+Atlanticist	O
+Integrationists	O
+want	O
+to	O
+join	O
+an	O
+unfree	O
+Western	O
+world	O
+?	O
+
+Are	B-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+brainwashed	I-PROP
+by	I-PROP
+Western	I-PROP
+Propaganda	I-PROP
+?	I-PROP
+
+If	B-PROP
+Putin	I-PROP
+listens	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+these	I-PROP
+deluded	I-PROP
+fools	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+Putin	I-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+destroy	I-PROP
+Russia	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+There	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+something	I-PROP
+wrong	I-PROP
+with	I-PROP
+Russian	I-PROP
+perception	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+Washington	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+Apparently	O
+the	O
+Russian	O
+elite	O
+,	O
+with	O
+the	O
+exception	O
+of	O
+Shoigu	O
+and	O
+a	O
+few	O
+others	O
+are	O
+incapable	B-PROP
+of	O
+comprehending	O
+the	O
+neoconservative	O
+drive	O
+for	O
+US	O
+world	O
+hegemony	O
+and	O
+the	O
+neoconservative	O
+determination	O
+to	O
+destroy	O
+Russia	O
+as	O
+a	O
+constraint	O
+on	O
+US	O
+unilateralism	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Russian	O
+government	O
+somehow	O
+,	O
+despite	O
+all	O
+evidence	O
+to	O
+the	O
+contrary	O
+,	O
+believes	O
+that	O
+Washington	O
+’s	O
+hegemony	O
+is	O
+negotiable	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Best	O
+of	O
+Paul	O
+Craig	O
+Roberts	O
+
+The	O
+Coming	O
+Coup	O
+
+The	O
+annual	O
+budget	O
+of	O
+the	O
+military	O
+/	O
+security	O
+complex	O
+is	O
+$	O
+1,000	O
+billion	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+vast	O
+sum	O
+is	O
+drawn	O
+from	O
+US	O
+taxpayers	O
+who	O
+have	O
+many	O
+unmet	O
+needs	O
+.	O
+
+To	O
+justify	O
+such	O
+an	O
+enormous	O
+budget	O
+a	O
+major	O
+enemy	O
+is	O
+required	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+military	O
+/	O
+security	O
+complex	O
+and	O
+the	O
+media	O
+and	O
+politicians	O
+that	O
+the	O
+complex	O
+owns	O
+have	O
+designated	O
+Russia	O
+to	O
+be	O
+that	O
+enemy	O
+.	O
+
+The	B-PROP
+complex	I-PROP
+and	O
+its	O
+political	O
+and	O
+media	O
+agents	O
+will	B-PROP
+not	I-PROP
+permit	I-PROP
+Trump	I-PROP
+to	O
+normalize	O
+relations	O
+with	O
+Russia	O
+.	O
+
+To	O
+prevent	O
+President	O
+Trump	O
+from	O
+reducing	O
+the	O
+dangerous	O
+tensions	O
+between	O
+nuclear	O
+powers	O
+that	O
+Washington	O
+has	O
+created	O
+,	O
+the	O
+military	O
+/	O
+security	O
+complex	O
+orchestrated	O
+Russiagate	O
+,	O
+a	B-PROP
+proven	I-PROP
+hoax	I-PROP
+,	O
+but	O
+believed	O
+by	O
+many	O
+due	O
+to	O
+its	O
+endless	O
+repetition	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+military	O
+/	O
+security	O
+complex	O
+orchestrated	O
+the	O
+false	O
+indictments	O
+of	O
+12	O
+Russians	B-PROP
+.	O
+
+The	O
+military	O
+/	O
+security	O
+complex	O
+orchestrated	O
+the	O
+false	O
+arrest	O
+of	O
+Maria	O
+Butina	O
+,	O
+and	O
+so	O
+on	O
+and	O
+on	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+military	O
+/	O
+security	O
+complex	O
+acting	O
+through	O
+the	O
+politicians	O
+and	O
+presstitutes	O
+that	O
+it	O
+owns	O
+and	O
+controls	O
+has	O
+turned	O
+the	O
+normal	O
+everyday	O
+responsibility	O
+of	O
+the	O
+President	O
+—	O
+one	O
+acknowledged	O
+and	O
+acted	O
+upon	O
+by	O
+every	O
+previous	O
+president	O
+—	O
+to	O
+defuse	O
+tensions	O
+that	O
+could	O
+lead	O
+to	O
+nuclear	O
+war	O
+into	O
+a	O
+high	O
+crime	O
+.	O
+
+President	O
+Trump	O
+is	O
+accused	O
+of	O
+treason	B-PROP
+for	O
+trying	O
+to	O
+make	O
+peace	O
+!	O
+
+The	O
+Tyranny	O
+of	O
+Good	O
+In	O
+...	O
+Paul	O
+Craig	O
+Roberts	O
+,	O
+La	O
+...	O
+Best	O
+Price	O
+:	O
+$	O
+5.64	O
+Buy	O
+New	O
+$	O
+5.00	O
+(	O
+as	O
+of	O
+10:35	O
+EDT	O
+-	O
+Details	O
+)	O
+
+An	O
+unaware	O
+person	O
+might	O
+think	O
+that	O
+this	O
+is	O
+silly	B-PROP
+and	O
+laugh	O
+,	O
+but	O
+as	O
+Finian	O
+Cunningham	O
+shows	O
+,	O
+President	B-PROP
+Trump	I-PROP
+has	I-PROP
+been	I-PROP
+set	I-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+up	I-PROP
+as	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+treasonous	I-PROP
+enemy	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+America	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+We	O
+are	O
+currently	O
+experiencing	O
+sedition	O
+at	O
+the	O
+highest	O
+levels	O
+as	O
+the	O
+military	O
+/	O
+security	O
+complex	O
+unfolds	O
+its	O
+coup	O
+against	O
+the	O
+elected	O
+president	O
+of	O
+the	O
+United	O
+States	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+1961	O
+President	O
+Dwight	O
+Eisenhower	O
+warned	O
+Americans	O
+in	O
+his	O
+last	O
+public	O
+address	O
+that	O
+the	O
+military	O
+/	O
+industrial	O
+complex	O
+was	O
+a	B-PROP
+threat	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+democracy	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Truer	O
+words	O
+were	O
+never	O
+spoken	O
+by	O
+an	O
+American	O
+president	O
+.	O
+
+Shortly	O
+thereafter	O
+,	O
+the	O
+military	O
+/	O
+security	O
+complex	O
+assassinated	O
+President	O
+John	O
+F.	O
+Kennedy	O
+for	O
+working	O
+toward	O
+peace	O
+with	O
+Soviet	B-PROP
+leader	O
+Khrushchev	O
+.	O
+
+To	O
+get	O
+rid	O
+of	O
+President	O
+Nixon	O
+,	O
+who	O
+made	O
+too	O
+many	O
+arms	O
+control	O
+agreements	O
+with	O
+the	O
+Soviets	O
+and	O
+opened	O
+to	O
+China	O
+,	O
+the	O
+military	O
+/	O
+security	O
+complex	O
+used	O
+its	O
+asset	O
+,	O
+the	O
+Washington	O
+Post	O
+,	O
+to	O
+orchestrate	O
+the	O
+“	O
+Watergate	O
+crisis	O
+”	O
+that	O
+the	O
+military	O
+/	O
+security	O
+complex	O
+used	O
+to	O
+force	O
+Nixon	O
+’s	O
+resignation	O
+.	O
+
+Now	O
+the	O
+military	O
+/	O
+security	O
+complex	O
+is	O
+openly	O
+inciting	O
+sedition	O
+against	O
+the	O
+President	O
+of	O
+the	O
+United	O
+States	O
+.	O
+
+If	O
+this	O
+plot	O
+succeeds	O
+,	O
+which	O
+is	O
+the	O
+most	O
+likely	O
+case	O
+,	O
+America	B-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+complete	I-PROP
+dystopia	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+all	I-PROP
+independent	I-PROP
+voices	I-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+shut	I-PROP
+down	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Who	O
+can	O
+Trump	O
+rely	O
+on	O
+?	O
+
+Not	O
+on	O
+his	O
+own	O
+political	O
+party	O
+.	O
+
+Not	O
+on	O
+his	O
+own	O
+government	O
+.	O
+
+Not	O
+on	O
+the	O
+print	O
+and	O
+TV	O
+media	O
+or	O
+NPR	O
+.	O
+
+Not	O
+on	O
+Europe	O
+.	O
+
+Not	O
+on	O
+the	O
+Secret	O
+Service	O
+.	O
+
+Not	O
+on	O
+the	O
+Pentagon	O
+.	O
+
+Not	O
+on	O
+the	O
+unaware	B-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Trump	O
+has	O
+only	O
+the	O
+“	B-PROP
+deplorables	I-PROP
+,	O
+”	O
+and	O
+they	O
+are	O
+unorganized	O
+and	O
+will	O
+experience	O
+retribution	O
+once	O
+Trump	O
+is	O
+removed	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+striving	O
+to	O
+come	O
+to	O
+an	O
+agreement	O
+with	O
+Washington	O
+,	O
+Putin	O
+and	O
+Lavrov	O
+are	O
+butting	B-PROP
+their	I-PROP
+heads	I-PROP
+against	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+stone	I-PROP
+wall	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Sooner	O
+or	O
+later	O
+Putin	O
+and	O
+Lavrov	O
+will	O
+have	O
+to	O
+acknowledge	O
+that	O
+.	O
+
+Once	O
+Putin	O
+and	O
+Lavrov	O
+realize	O
+the	O
+true	O
+situation	O
+,	O
+they	O
+will	O
+understand	O
+that	O
+war	B-PROP
+or	I-PROP
+surrender	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+their	I-PROP
+only	I-PROP
+option	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Best	O
+of	O
+Paul	O
+Craig	O
+Roberts	O
+
+Federal	O
+Judge	O
+Overrides	O
+DOJ	O
+&	O
+Violates	O
+First	O
+Amendment	O
+:	O
+Blocks	O
+3D	O
+-	O
+Printed	O
+Gun	O
+Plans	O
+
+In	O
+July	O
+,	O
+I	O
+reported	O
+that	O
+the	O
+Department	O
+of	O
+Justice	O
+finally	O
+settled	O
+with	O
+Cody	O
+Wilson	O
+and	O
+Defense	O
+Distributed	O
+over	O
+his	O
+3D	O
+-	O
+print	O
+gun	O
+plans	O
+being	O
+lawful	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+DOJ	O
+surrendered	O
+in	O
+the	O
+matter	O
+and	O
+accepted	O
+the	O
+fact	O
+that	O
+the	O
+plans	O
+are	O
+protected	O
+under	O
+the	O
+First	O
+Amendment	O
+.	O
+
+However	O
+,	O
+a	O
+federal	O
+judge	O
+,	O
+in	O
+a	O
+lawsuit	O
+brought	O
+by	O
+eight	O
+states	O
+and	O
+the	O
+District	O
+of	O
+Columbia	O
+,	O
+has	O
+blocked	O
+the	O
+plans	O
+from	O
+being	O
+released	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+judge	O
+should	O
+understand	O
+that	O
+these	O
+plans	O
+are	O
+protected	O
+under	O
+the	O
+First	O
+Amendment	O
+in	O
+the	O
+same	O
+way	O
+that	O
+any	O
+other	O
+printed	O
+material	O
+is	O
+,	O
+and	O
+that	O
+there	O
+is	O
+no	O
+crime	O
+that	O
+has	O
+been	O
+committed	O
+by	O
+making	O
+them	O
+available	O
+to	O
+people	O
+online	O
+.	O
+
+Second	O
+,	O
+if	O
+that	O
+were	O
+not	O
+enough	O
+,	O
+we	O
+already	O
+know	O
+that	O
+the	O
+Second	O
+Amendment	O
+protects	O
+actual	O
+arms	O
+from	O
+restriction	O
+and	O
+the	O
+right	O
+to	O
+keep	O
+and	O
+bear	O
+them	O
+from	O
+infringement	O
+.	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+
+Will	O
+Brett	O
+Kavanaugh	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Supreme	O
+Court	O
+?	O
+
+Will	O
+Brett	O
+Kavanaugh	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Supreme	O
+Court	O
+?	O
+
+Will	O
+Brett	O
+Kavanaugh	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Supreme	O
+Court	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+Yes	O
+,	O
+he	O
+will	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+.	O
+
+No	O
+,	O
+he	O
+will	O
+not	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+.	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Comments	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Freedom	O
+Outpost	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+Fox	O
+News	O
+has	O
+the	O
+story	O
+:	O
+
+U.S.	O
+District	O
+Judge	O
+Robert	O
+Lasnik	O
+issued	O
+the	O
+order	O
+a	O
+day	O
+after	O
+eight	O
+states	O
+sued	O
+the	O
+government	O
+to	O
+block	O
+a	O
+settlement	O
+reached	O
+by	O
+the	O
+Trump	O
+administration	O
+last	O
+month	O
+allowing	O
+a	O
+Texas	O
+-	O
+based	O
+company	O
+,	O
+Defense	O
+Distributed	O
+,	O
+to	O
+resume	O
+online	O
+-	O
+sharing	O
+of	O
+blueprints	O
+for	O
+the	O
+3D	O
+firearms	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+company	O
+was	O
+set	O
+to	O
+allow	O
+downloads	O
+on	O
+Wednesday	O
+,	O
+although	O
+blueprints	O
+have	O
+been	O
+posted	O
+since	O
+Friday	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+temporary	O
+restraining	O
+order	O
+blocks	O
+the	O
+release	O
+until	O
+the	O
+next	O
+scheduled	O
+hearing	O
+on	O
+August	O
+10	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+the	O
+meantime	O
+,	O
+Congressional	O
+Democrats	O
+have	O
+urged	O
+President	O
+Trump	O
+to	O
+reverse	O
+the	O
+decision	O
+letting	O
+Defense	O
+Distributed	O
+publish	O
+the	O
+plans	O
+.	O
+
+Trump	O
+said	O
+Tuesday	O
+that	O
+he	O
+'s	O
+"	O
+looking	O
+into	O
+"	O
+the	O
+idea	O
+,	O
+saying	O
+making	O
+3D	O
+plastic	O
+guns	O
+available	O
+to	O
+the	O
+public	O
+"	O
+does	O
+n't	O
+seem	O
+to	O
+make	O
+much	O
+sense	O
+!	O
+"	O
+
+Does	O
+n't	O
+make	O
+much	O
+sense	O
+?	O
+
+Are	B-PROP
+you	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+serious	I-PROP
+?	I-PROP
+
+Why	O
+,	O
+yes	O
+,	O
+yes	O
+they	O
+are	O
+serious	O
+.	O
+
+Deadly	B-PROP
+serious	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+It	O
+makes	O
+perfect	O
+sense	O
+when	O
+you	O
+have	O
+the	B-PROP
+same	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+who	I-PROP
+have	I-PROP
+absolutely	I-PROP
+no	I-PROP
+problem	I-PROP
+with	O
+mothers	B-PROP
+hiring	I-PROP
+hitmen	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+murder	B-PROP
+their	I-PROP
+babies	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+their	I-PROP
+wombs	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+most	I-PROP
+brutal	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+barbaric	I-PROP
+fashion	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+then	I-PROP
+sell	I-PROP
+off	I-PROP
+their	I-PROP
+body	I-PROP
+parts	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+profit	I-PROP
+,	O
+if	B-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+n't	I-PROP
+throw	I-PROP
+them	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+trash	I-PROP
+or	I-PROP
+flush	I-PROP
+them	I-PROP
+down	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+toilet	I-PROP
+,	O
+calling	O
+for	O
+computer	O
+files	O
+to	O
+be	O
+kept	O
+by	O
+the	O
+government	O
+and	O
+not	O
+be	O
+allowed	O
+to	O
+be	O
+released	O
+to	O
+the	O
+public	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+eight	O
+states	O
+are	O
+the	O
+usual	O
+suspects	O
+,	O
+along	O
+with	O
+the	O
+District	O
+of	O
+Columbia	O
+,	O
+and	O
+we	O
+should	O
+note	O
+which	O
+ones	O
+they	O
+are	O
+.	O
+
+Washington	O
+
+Connecticut	O
+
+Maryland	O
+
+New	O
+Jersey	O
+
+New	O
+York	O
+
+Oregon	O
+
+Massachusetts	O
+
+Pennsylvania	O
+
+Washington	O
+'s	O
+Attorney	O
+General	O
+Bob	O
+Ferguson	O
+'s	O
+office	O
+claims	O
+the	O
+settlement	O
+is	O
+:	O
+
+...	O
+in	O
+violation	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Administrative	O
+Procedure	O
+Act	O
+....	O
+there	O
+is	O
+no	O
+indication	O
+in	O
+the	O
+settlement	O
+agreement	O
+or	O
+elsewhere	O
+that	O
+any	O
+analysis	O
+,	O
+study	O
+or	O
+determination	O
+was	O
+made	O
+by	O
+the	O
+government	O
+defendants	O
+in	O
+consultation	O
+with	O
+other	O
+agencies	O
+,	O
+before	O
+the	O
+federal	O
+government	O
+agreed	O
+to	O
+lift	O
+export	O
+controls	O
+on	O
+the	O
+downloadable	O
+guns	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+fact	O
+,	O
+the	O
+agreement	O
+states	O
+that	O
+it	O
+"	O
+does	O
+not	O
+reflect	O
+any	O
+agreed	O
+-	O
+upon	O
+purpose	O
+other	O
+than	O
+the	O
+desire	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Parties	O
+to	O
+reach	O
+a	O
+full	O
+and	O
+final	O
+conclusion	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Action	O
+,	O
+and	O
+to	O
+resolve	O
+the	O
+Action	O
+without	O
+the	O
+time	O
+and	O
+expense	O
+of	O
+further	O
+litigation	O
+.	O
+"	O
+
+The	O
+lawsuit	O
+also	O
+argues	O
+the	O
+settlement	O
+violates	O
+the	O
+Tenth	O
+Amendment	O
+by	O
+infringing	O
+on	O
+states	O
+'	O
+rights	O
+to	O
+regulate	O
+firearms	O
+.	O
+
+Washington	O
+has	O
+a	O
+robust	O
+regulatory	O
+system	O
+meant	O
+to	O
+keep	O
+firearms	O
+out	O
+of	O
+the	O
+hands	O
+of	O
+dangerous	O
+individuals	O
+.	O
+
+That	O
+system	O
+is	O
+jeopardized	O
+by	O
+the	O
+Trump	O
+Administration	O
+'s	O
+action	O
+and	O
+will	O
+be	O
+undermined	O
+by	O
+the	O
+distribution	O
+of	O
+Defense	O
+Distributed	O
+'s	O
+downloadable	O
+guns	O
+.	O
+
+Note	O
+that	O
+Ferguson	O
+forgets	O
+that	O
+the	O
+Tenth	O
+Amendment	O
+states	O
+plainly	O
+:	O
+
+The	O
+powers	O
+not	O
+delegated	O
+to	O
+the	O
+United	O
+States	O
+by	O
+the	O
+Constitution	O
+,	O
+nor	O
+prohibited	O
+by	O
+it	O
+to	O
+the	O
+States	O
+,	O
+are	O
+reserved	O
+to	O
+the	O
+States	O
+respectively	O
+,	O
+or	O
+to	O
+the	O
+people	O
+.	O
+
+(	O
+emphasis	O
+mine	O
+)	O
+
+Since	O
+our	O
+founders	O
+clearly	O
+said	O
+that	O
+our	O
+rights	O
+come	O
+from	O
+our	O
+Creator	O
+,	O
+and	O
+the	O
+Second	O
+Amendment	O
+acknowledges	O
+that	O
+the	O
+"	O
+right	O
+of	O
+the	O
+people	O
+to	O
+keep	O
+and	O
+bear	O
+arms	O
+shall	O
+not	O
+be	O
+infringed	O
+,	O
+"	O
+I	O
+truly	O
+wonder	O
+where	B-PROP
+he	I-PROP
+gets	I-PROP
+this	I-PROP
+idea	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+state	I-PROP
+has	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+right	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+just	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+infringe	I-PROP
+on	O
+the	O
+rights	O
+of	O
+the	O
+people	O
+by	O
+regulating	O
+firearms	O
+.	O
+
+he	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+reading	I-PROP
+something	I-PROP
+into	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+simply	I-PROP
+not	I-PROP
+there	I-PROP
+,	O
+but	O
+that	O
+'s	O
+a	O
+Communist	O
+ideology	O
+you	O
+are	O
+seeing	O
+there	O
+,	O
+not	B-PROP
+an	I-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+one	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Reason	O
+reports	O
+on	O
+the	O
+response	O
+of	O
+Defense	O
+Distributed	O
+:	O
+
+Josh	O
+Blackman	O
+,	O
+one	O
+of	O
+Defense	O
+Distributed	O
+'s	O
+lawyers	O
+,	O
+said	O
+in	O
+an	O
+email	O
+today	O
+that	O
+"	O
+The	O
+District	O
+Court	O
+in	O
+Washington	O
+already	O
+approved	O
+the	O
+settlement	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+latest	O
+suit	O
+is	O
+another	O
+collateral	O
+attack	O
+on	O
+a	O
+rule	O
+-	O
+making	O
+process	O
+that	O
+began	O
+in	O
+the	O
+Obama	O
+Administration	O
+.	O
+"	O
+
+As	O
+reported	O
+yesterday	O
+,	O
+Defense	O
+Distributed	O
+is	O
+already	O
+embroiled	O
+in	O
+its	O
+own	O
+lawsuit	O
+against	O
+New	O
+Jersey	O
+and	O
+Los	O
+Angeles	O
+over	O
+those	O
+authorities	O
+'	O
+threats	O
+,	O
+and	O
+simultaneously	O
+is	O
+fighting	O
+Pennsylvania	O
+'s	O
+request	O
+for	O
+a	O
+temporary	O
+restraining	O
+order	O
+against	O
+them	O
+.	O
+
+(	O
+Both	O
+those	O
+states	O
+are	O
+also	O
+part	O
+of	O
+today	O
+'s	O
+federal	O
+lawsuit	O
+filed	O
+in	O
+the	O
+Western	O
+District	O
+of	O
+Washington	O
+.	O
+)	O
+
+While	O
+the	O
+various	O
+court	O
+filings	O
+about	O
+this	O
+continue	O
+to	O
+suggest	O
+that	O
+August	O
+1	O
+is	O
+the	O
+date	O
+on	O
+which	O
+Defense	O
+Distributed	O
+will	O
+begin	O
+distributing	O
+the	O
+files	O
+—	O
+which	O
+,	O
+again	O
+,	O
+the	O
+settlement	O
+legally	O
+permits	O
+them	O
+to	O
+do	O
+—	O
+the	O
+distribution	O
+is	O
+already	O
+happening	O
+.	O
+
+Cody	O
+Wilson	O
+of	O
+Defense	O
+Distributed	O
+is	O
+already	O
+fundraising	O
+off	O
+the	O
+suit	O
+via	O
+Twitter	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+told	O
+me	O
+five	O
+years	O
+ago	O
+,	O
+when	O
+I	O
+was	O
+writing	O
+a	O
+feature	O
+story	O
+on	O
+the	O
+beginnings	O
+of	O
+his	O
+fight	O
+with	O
+the	O
+government	O
+over	O
+gun	O
+-	O
+making	O
+files	O
+,	O
+that	O
+"	O
+This	O
+has	O
+been	O
+a	O
+continuous	O
+process	O
+of	O
+different	O
+levels	O
+of	O
+authority	O
+figures	O
+trying	O
+to	O
+stop	O
+it	O
+from	O
+happening	O
+and	O
+thus	O
+allowing	O
+it	O
+to	O
+happen	O
+...	O
+Of	O
+course	O
+we	O
+are	O
+going	O
+to	O
+succeed	O
+—	O
+because	O
+you	O
+all	O
+are	O
+trying	O
+to	O
+stop	O
+me	O
+.	O
+
+That	O
+seemed	O
+natural	O
+and	O
+ended	O
+up	O
+being	O
+true	O
+.	O
+"	O
+
+So	O
+far	O
+,	O
+that	O
+has	O
+continued	O
+to	O
+be	O
+true	O
+.	O
+
+This	B-PROP
+federal	I-PROP
+judge	I-PROP
+should	I-PROP
+know	I-PROP
+what	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+Constitution	I-PROP
+actually	I-PROP
+says	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+should	I-PROP
+have	I-PROP
+tossed	I-PROP
+this	I-PROP
+frivolous	I-PROP
+lawsuit	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+trash	I-PROP
+where	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+belongs	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Instead	O
+,	O
+he	O
+is	O
+demonstrating	O
+he	O
+is	O
+not	O
+even	O
+fit	O
+to	O
+sit	O
+on	O
+the	O
+bench	O
+,	O
+and	O
+the	O
+attorney	O
+generals	O
+of	O
+each	O
+of	O
+these	O
+states	O
+are	O
+demonstrating	O
+they	O
+are	O
+not	O
+fit	O
+to	O
+be	O
+in	O
+the	O
+office	O
+they	O
+are	O
+in	O
+.	O
+
+Speaking	O
+of	O
+Defense	O
+Distributed	O
+and	O
+Cody	O
+Wilson	O
+,	O
+enter	O
+to	O
+win	O
+this	O
+Ghost	O
+Gunner	O
+2	O
+and	O
+make	O
+your	O
+own	O
+guns	O
+at	O
+home	O
+!	O
+
+Texan	O
+behind	O
+3D	O
+-	O
+printed	O
+guns	O
+vows	O
+legal	O
+fight	O
+as	O
+White	O
+House	O
+endorses	O
+court	O
+ruling	O
+|	O
+Bangkok	O
+Post	O
+:	O
+news	O
+
+CHICAGO	O
+-	O
+A	O
+US	O
+gun	O
+rights	O
+advocate	O
+began	O
+gearing	O
+up	O
+for	O
+a	O
+legal	O
+fight	O
+Wednesday	O
+to	O
+be	O
+able	O
+to	O
+publish	O
+online	O
+blueprints	O
+for	O
+3D	O
+-	O
+printed	O
+firearms	O
+,	O
+as	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+signaled	O
+support	O
+for	O
+a	O
+federal	O
+judge	O
+'s	O
+decision	O
+to	O
+block	O
+the	O
+venture	O
+.	O
+
+Eight	O
+US	O
+states	O
+and	O
+the	O
+District	O
+of	O
+Columbia	O
+have	O
+argued	O
+in	O
+court	O
+that	O
+the	O
+blueprints	O
+available	O
+online	O
+to	O
+make	O
+untraceable	O
+,	O
+undetectable	O
+plastic	O
+weapons	O
+like	O
+this	O
+single	O
+-	O
+shot	O
+"	O
+Liberator	O
+"	O
+handgun	O
+could	O
+fall	O
+into	O
+the	O
+wrong	O
+hands	O
+
+Cody	O
+Wilson	O
+'s	O
+Texas	O
+-	O
+based	O
+company	O
+Defense	O
+Distributed	O
+had	O
+briefly	O
+made	O
+the	O
+blueprints	O
+available	O
+online	O
+,	O
+but	O
+Seattle	O
+-	O
+based	O
+US	O
+District	O
+Judge	O
+Robert	O
+Lasnik	O
+granted	O
+an	O
+injunction	O
+Tuesday	O
+to	O
+take	O
+the	O
+material	O
+down	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Donald	O
+Trump	O
+administration	O
+last	O
+month	O
+gave	O
+permission	O
+for	O
+Wilson	O
+to	O
+publish	O
+the	O
+blueprints	O
+,	O
+but	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+said	O
+Wednesday	O
+the	O
+president	O
+was	O
+unaware	O
+of	O
+the	O
+decision	O
+and	O
+was	O
+glad	O
+it	O
+was	O
+being	O
+reviewed	O
+.	O
+
+Eight	O
+US	O
+states	O
+and	O
+the	O
+District	O
+of	O
+Columbia	O
+sued	O
+,	O
+arguing	O
+the	O
+blueprints	O
+could	O
+allow	O
+anyone	O
+--	O
+from	O
+a	O
+teen	O
+to	O
+a	B-PROP
+'	I-PROP
+lone	I-PROP
+wolf	I-PROP
+'	I-PROP
+gunman	I-PROP
+--	O
+to	O
+make	O
+untraceable	O
+,	O
+undetectable	O
+plastic	O
+weapons	O
+.	O
+
+Wilson	O
+complied	O
+with	O
+the	O
+judge	O
+'s	O
+order	O
+,	O
+but	O
+put	O
+out	O
+a	O
+call	O
+for	O
+financial	O
+support	O
+for	O
+the	O
+legal	O
+battle	O
+ahead	O
+,	O
+including	O
+a	O
+scheduled	O
+August	O
+10	O
+court	O
+hearing	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+told	O
+CBS	O
+News	O
+ahead	O
+of	O
+the	O
+injunction	O
+that	O
+he	O
+believes	O
+"	O
+access	O
+to	O
+firearms	O
+is	O
+a	O
+fundamental	O
+human	O
+dignity	O
+.	O
+
+It	O
+'s	O
+a	O
+fundamental	O
+human	O
+right	O
+.	O
+"	O
+
+"	O
+What	O
+I	O
+'m	O
+doing	O
+is	O
+legally	O
+protected	O
+,	O
+"	O
+he	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+I	O
+will	O
+go	O
+to	O
+the	O
+appellate	O
+level	O
+.	O
+
+I	O
+will	O
+go	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Supreme	O
+Court	O
+.	O
+
+I	B-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+waste	I-PROP
+all	I-PROP
+my	I-PROP
+time	I-PROP
+.	O
+"	O
+
+-	O
+President	O
+'	O
+glad	O
+'	O
+for	O
+review	O
+-	O
+
+As	O
+uproar	O
+was	O
+building	O
+Tuesday	O
+over	O
+Wilson	O
+'s	O
+efforts	O
+,	O
+the	O
+president	O
+tweeted	O
+that	O
+making	O
+plastic	O
+3D	O
+-	O
+printed	O
+guns	O
+publicly	O
+available	O
+"	O
+does	O
+n't	O
+seem	O
+to	O
+make	O
+much	O
+sense	O
+.	O
+"	O
+
+White	O
+House	O
+spokeswoman	O
+Sarah	O
+Sanders	O
+elaborated	O
+Wednesday	O
+,	O
+saying	O
+the	O
+administration	O
+'s	O
+Justice	O
+Department	O
+had	O
+acted	O
+on	O
+its	O
+own	O
+in	O
+granting	O
+Wilson	O
+permission	O
+to	O
+publish	O
+the	O
+blueprints	O
+on	O
+his	O
+Defcad	O
+website	O
+--	O
+settling	O
+a	O
+five	O
+-	O
+year	O
+legal	O
+battle	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+The	O
+Department	O
+of	O
+Justice	O
+made	O
+a	O
+deal	O
+without	O
+the	O
+president	O
+'s	O
+approval	O
+,	O
+"	O
+Sanders	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+The	O
+president	O
+'s	O
+glad	O
+this	O
+effort	O
+was	O
+delayed	O
+to	O
+give	O
+more	O
+time	O
+to	O
+review	O
+the	O
+issue	O
+.	O
+"	O
+
+Sanders	O
+also	O
+repeated	O
+the	O
+administration	O
+'s	O
+claim	O
+from	O
+a	O
+day	O
+earlier	O
+that	O
+existing	O
+law	O
+already	O
+prohibits	O
+plastic	O
+firearms	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+National	O
+Rifle	O
+Association	O
+,	O
+the	O
+nation	O
+'s	O
+most	O
+politically	O
+influential	O
+gun	O
+rights	O
+group	O
+,	O
+echoed	O
+that	O
+claim	O
+,	O
+contending	O
+that	O
+the	O
+1988	O
+law	O
+made	O
+the	O
+current	O
+3D	O
+-	O
+printed	O
+gun	O
+issue	O
+moot	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+Regardless	O
+of	O
+what	O
+a	O
+person	O
+may	O
+be	O
+able	O
+to	O
+publish	O
+on	O
+the	O
+Internet	O
+,	O
+undetectable	O
+plastic	O
+guns	O
+have	O
+been	O
+illegal	O
+for	O
+30	O
+years	O
+,	O
+"	O
+the	O
+NRA	O
+said	O
+in	O
+a	O
+statement	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+Wilson	O
+has	O
+gotten	O
+around	O
+the	O
+legal	O
+prohibition	O
+by	O
+providing	O
+instructions	O
+with	O
+the	O
+digital	O
+files	O
+for	O
+3D	O
+printing	O
+his	O
+"	O
+Liberator	O
+"	O
+plastic	O
+gun	O
+that	O
+call	O
+for	O
+an	O
+approximately	O
+six	O
+-	O
+ounce	O
+block	O
+of	O
+steel	O
+to	O
+be	O
+affixed	O
+to	O
+the	O
+weapon	O
+.	O
+
+Should	O
+those	O
+who	O
+print	O
+the	O
+gun	O
+follow	O
+those	O
+instructions	O
+,	O
+metal	O
+detectors	O
+would	O
+pick	O
+up	O
+the	O
+weapons	O
+,	O
+thus	O
+complying	O
+with	O
+the	O
+law	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+while	O
+users	O
+can	O
+build	O
+the	O
+gun	O
+,	O
+there	O
+is	O
+no	O
+way	O
+to	O
+ensure	O
+they	O
+affix	O
+metal	O
+to	O
+it	O
+.	O
+
+-	O
+'	O
+The	O
+debate	O
+is	O
+over	O
+'	O
+-	O
+
+Late	O
+Tuesday	O
+,	O
+dozens	O
+of	O
+Democratic	O
+senators	O
+introduced	O
+legislation	O
+to	O
+prohibit	O
+the	O
+publication	O
+of	O
+3D	O
+-	O
+printable	O
+firearm	O
+designs	O
+,	O
+a	O
+move	O
+gun	O
+control	O
+groups	O
+applauded	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+some	O
+damage	O
+was	O
+already	O
+done	O
+.	O
+
+Wilson	O
+'s	O
+blueprints	O
+had	O
+been	O
+posted	O
+on	O
+Defcad	O
+before	O
+the	O
+court	O
+order	O
+took	O
+effect	O
+and	O
+had	O
+already	O
+been	O
+downloaded	O
+thousands	O
+of	O
+times	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+The	O
+debate	O
+is	O
+over	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+guns	O
+are	O
+downloadable	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+files	O
+are	O
+in	O
+the	O
+public	O
+domain	O
+--	O
+you	O
+can	O
+not	O
+take	O
+them	O
+back	O
+,	O
+"	O
+Wilson	O
+told	O
+CBS	O
+.	O
+
+Gun	O
+control	O
+groups	O
+nevertheless	O
+were	O
+relieved	O
+by	O
+the	O
+judge	O
+'s	O
+decision	O
+,	O
+with	O
+the	O
+Brady	O
+Campaign	O
+to	O
+Prevent	O
+Gun	O
+Violence	O
+calling	O
+3D	O
+-	O
+printed	O
+firearms	O
+"	O
+nothing	B-PROP
+short	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+menace	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+society	I-PROP
+.	O
+"	O
+
+"	O
+There	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+simply	I-PROP
+no	I-PROP
+way	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+telling	I-PROP
+how	I-PROP
+much	I-PROP
+damage	I-PROP
+has	I-PROP
+already	I-PROP
+been	I-PROP
+done	I-PROP
+by	O
+Cody	O
+Wilson	O
+'s	O
+dangerous	B-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+reckless	B-PROP
+actions	I-PROP
+,	O
+"	O
+Brady	O
+Campaign	O
+co	O
+-	O
+president	O
+Kris	O
+Brown	O
+said	O
+in	O
+a	O
+statement	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+This	O
+is	O
+a	O
+strong	O
+step	O
+and	O
+a	O
+clear	O
+victory	O
+for	O
+the	O
+entire	O
+gun	O
+safety	O
+movement	O
+,	O
+but	O
+we	B-PROP
+simply	I-PROP
+ca	I-PROP
+n't	I-PROP
+let	I-PROP
+up	I-PROP
+.	O
+"	O
+
+Prior	O
+to	O
+last	O
+month	O
+,	O
+Wilson	O
+had	O
+actually	O
+been	O
+losing	O
+his	O
+drawn	O
+-	O
+out	O
+legal	O
+battle	O
+,	O
+after	O
+both	O
+a	O
+federal	O
+district	O
+court	O
+and	O
+an	O
+appellate	O
+court	O
+ruled	O
+against	O
+him	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+US	O
+Supreme	O
+Court	O
+declined	O
+to	O
+take	O
+up	O
+his	O
+case	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+in	O
+a	O
+sign	O
+of	O
+his	O
+determination	O
+to	O
+continue	O
+the	O
+legal	O
+fight	O
+,	O
+a	O
+message	O
+on	O
+the	O
+Defense	O
+Distributed	O
+website	O
+made	O
+a	O
+public	O
+appeal	O
+for	O
+financial	O
+support	O
+"	O
+to	O
+uncensor	O
+the	O
+site	O
+.	O
+"	O
+
+11	O
+Children	O
+Have	O
+Been	O
+Rescued	O
+From	O
+a	O
+Muslim	B-PROP
+Extremist	O
+-	O
+Run	O
+Compound	O
+In	O
+NM	O
+
+Eleven	O
+children	O
+were	O
+rescued	O
+from	O
+a	O
+compound	O
+in	O
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+which	O
+was	O
+being	O
+run	O
+by	O
+armed	B-PROP
+Muslim	I-PROP
+extremists	O
+.	O
+
+Authorities	O
+found	O
+all	O
+the	O
+children	O
+living	O
+in	O
+deplorable	B-PROP
+living	I-PROP
+conditions	I-PROP
+after	O
+raiding	O
+the	O
+property	O
+looking	O
+specifically	O
+for	O
+a	O
+three	O
+-	O
+year	O
+-	O
+old	O
+boy	O
+.	O
+
+According	O
+to	O
+The	O
+Daily	O
+Caller	O
+,	O
+the	O
+police	O
+did	O
+n’t	O
+find	O
+the	O
+little	O
+boy	O
+,	O
+named	O
+Abdul	O
+-	O
+Ghani	O
+Wahhaj	O
+,	O
+but	O
+they	O
+did	O
+discover	O
+11	O
+other	O
+children	O
+between	O
+the	O
+ages	O
+of	O
+one	O
+and	O
+15-years	O
+-	O
+old	O
+being	O
+held	O
+in	O
+the	B-PROP
+“	I-PROP
+saddest	B-PROP
+living	I-PROP
+conditions	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+poverty	I-PROP
+I	I-PROP
+have	I-PROP
+seen	I-PROP
+,	O
+”	O
+Taos	O
+County	O
+Sheriff	O
+Jerry	O
+Hogrefe	O
+said	O
+in	O
+a	O
+statement	O
+posted	O
+to	O
+the	O
+agency	O
+’s	O
+Facebook	O
+page	O
+Saturday	O
+.	O
+
+Hogrefe	O
+also	O
+added	O
+that	O
+he	O
+only	O
+saw	O
+a	O
+few	O
+potatoes	O
+and	O
+a	O
+box	O
+of	O
+rice	O
+as	O
+food	O
+at	O
+the	O
+compound	O
+.	O
+
+Abdul	O
+-	O
+Ghani	O
+’s	O
+mother	O
+reported	O
+her	O
+son	O
+missing	O
+after	O
+Wahhaj	O
+took	O
+the	O
+boy	O
+,	O
+who	O
+turned	O
+4	O
+on	O
+Monday	O
+,	O
+to	O
+the	O
+park	O
+in	O
+Clayton	O
+County	O
+,	O
+Georgia	O
+,	O
+and	O
+did	O
+n’t	O
+return	O
+,	O
+The	O
+Albuquerque	O
+Journal	O
+reported	O
+.	O
+
+She	O
+added	O
+the	O
+boy	O
+suffers	O
+from	O
+a	O
+medical	O
+condition	O
+.	O
+
+Investigators	O
+believe	O
+that	O
+the	O
+three	O
+-	O
+year	O
+-	O
+old	O
+boy	O
+,	O
+who	O
+turned	O
+four	O
+on	O
+Monday	O
+,	O
+they	O
+were	O
+looking	O
+for	O
+had	O
+been	O
+at	O
+the	O
+compound	O
+in	O
+earlier	O
+weeks	O
+.	O
+
+Siraj	O
+Wahhaj	O
+,	O
+39	O
+,	O
+and	O
+Lucas	O
+Morten	O
+,	O
+two	O
+very	O
+heavily	O
+armed	O
+men	O
+who	O
+are	O
+believed	O
+to	O
+be	O
+“	O
+extremist[s	B-PROP
+]	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+Muslim	I-PROP
+belief	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+”	O
+were	O
+running	O
+the	O
+horrifying	B-PROP
+compound	O
+,	O
+Hogrefe	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+When	O
+police	O
+arrived	O
+on	O
+the	O
+scene	O
+,	O
+Wahhaj	O
+was	O
+armed	O
+with	O
+an	O
+AR-15-style	O
+rifle	O
+and	O
+several	O
+loaded	O
+30-round	O
+magazines	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+also	O
+allegedly	O
+had	O
+on	O
+him	O
+four	O
+loaded	O
+pistols	O
+.	O
+
+According	O
+to	O
+a	O
+report	O
+by	O
+Fox	O
+News	O
+,	O
+Hogrefe	O
+said	O
+authorities	O
+had	O
+conducted	O
+surveillance	O
+of	O
+the	O
+compound	O
+while	O
+looking	O
+for	O
+the	O
+missing	O
+boy	O
+before	O
+he	O
+decided	O
+Thursday	O
+to	O
+get	O
+a	O
+search	O
+warrant	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+warrant	O
+was	O
+immediately	O
+obtained	O
+after	O
+a	O
+Georgia	O
+investigator	O
+forwarded	O
+a	O
+message	O
+in	O
+which	O
+someone	O
+at	O
+the	O
+compound	O
+reportedly	O
+told	O
+another	O
+person	O
+that	O
+people	O
+who	O
+were	O
+living	O
+in	O
+the	O
+shanty	O
+were	O
+starving	O
+and	O
+needed	O
+water	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+The	O
+message	O
+sent	O
+to	O
+a	O
+third	O
+party	O
+simply	O
+said	O
+in	O
+part	O
+,	O
+‘	O
+We	O
+are	O
+starving	O
+and	O
+need	O
+food	O
+and	O
+water	O
+,	O
+’	O
+”	O
+Hogrefe	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+I	O
+absolutely	O
+knew	O
+that	O
+we	O
+could	O
+n’t	O
+wait	O
+on	O
+another	O
+agency	O
+to	O
+step	O
+up	O
+and	O
+we	O
+had	O
+to	O
+go	O
+check	O
+this	O
+out	O
+as	O
+soon	O
+as	O
+possible	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Police	O
+stated	O
+on	O
+Sunday	O
+that	O
+they	O
+are	O
+still	O
+looking	O
+for	O
+Abdul	O
+-	O
+Ghani	O
+.	O
+
+2	O
+Men	O
+,	O
+Moms	O
+Arrested	O
+After	O
+Child	O
+Found	O
+Dead	O
+,	O
+11	O
+More	O
+Found	O
+In	O
+‘	O
+Filthy	B-PROP
+’	I-PROP
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+Compound	O
+With	O
+Armed	O
+‘	O
+Muslim	B-PROP
+Extremists	I-PROP
+’	O
+
+TAOS	O
+COUNTY	O
+,	O
+NEW	O
+MEXICO	O
+—	O
+Two	O
+males	O
+from	O
+Georgia	O
+are	O
+in	O
+custody	O
+after	O
+TCSO	O
+served	O
+a	O
+search	O
+warrant	O
+at	O
+a	O
+makeshift	O
+residence	O
+that	O
+is	O
+best	O
+described	O
+as	O
+a	O
+“	O
+compound	O
+”	O
+in	O
+Amalia	O
+,	O
+NM	O
+.	O
+
+Eleven	O
+children	O
+ranging	O
+in	O
+age	O
+from	O
+1	O
+to	O
+15-years	O
+-	O
+old	O
+were	O
+also	O
+taken	O
+in	O
+protective	O
+custody	O
+and	O
+later	O
+turned	O
+over	O
+to	O
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+Children	O
+Youth	O
+and	O
+Families	O
+Department	O
+(	O
+CYFD	O
+)	O
+for	O
+their	O
+own	O
+health	O
+and	O
+safety	O
+.	O
+
+Three	O
+women	O
+believed	O
+to	O
+be	O
+the	O
+children	O
+’s	O
+mothers	O
+were	O
+also	O
+arrested	O
+.	O
+
+Thursday	O
+afternoon	O
+Sheriff	O
+Jerry	O
+Hogrefe	O
+swore	O
+out	O
+an	O
+affidavit	O
+for	O
+a	O
+search	O
+warrant	O
+that	O
+states	O
+there	O
+is	O
+a	O
+makeshift	O
+compound	O
+surrounded	O
+by	O
+tires	O
+and	O
+an	O
+earthen	O
+berm	O
+in	O
+Costilla	O
+Meadows	O
+subdivision	O
+that	O
+he	O
+reasonably	O
+believed	O
+was	O
+occupied	O
+by	O
+adult	O
+Lucas	O
+Morton	O
+and	O
+others	O
+,	O
+including	O
+39-year	O
+-	O
+old	O
+Siraj	O
+Wahhaj	O
+,	O
+who	O
+was	O
+wanted	O
+for	O
+child	O
+abduction	O
+and	O
+3-year	O
+-	O
+old	O
+AG	O
+Wahhaj	O
+,	O
+the	O
+child	O
+that	O
+was	O
+abducted	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+warrant	O
+came	O
+after	O
+a	O
+two	O
+-	O
+month	O
+investigation	O
+in	O
+conjunction	O
+with	O
+Clayton	O
+County	O
+,	O
+Georgia	O
+and	O
+FBI	O
+investigators	O
+.	O
+
+According	O
+to	O
+Sheriff	O
+Hogrefe	O
+the	O
+FBI	O
+had	O
+recently	O
+provided	O
+information	O
+and	O
+surveillance	O
+on	O
+this	O
+location	O
+,	O
+but	O
+they	O
+(	O
+FBI	O
+)	O
+did	O
+n’t	O
+feel	O
+there	O
+was	O
+enough	O
+probable	O
+cause	O
+to	O
+get	O
+on	O
+the	O
+property	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+the	O
+press	O
+release	O
+Sheriff	O
+Hogrefe	O
+said	O
+,	O
+“	O
+That	O
+all	O
+changed	O
+for	O
+me	O
+when	O
+a	O
+message	O
+was	O
+forwarded	O
+to	O
+us	O
+from	O
+a	O
+Georgia	O
+Detective	O
+that	O
+we	O
+reasonably	O
+believed	O
+came	O
+from	O
+someone	O
+at	O
+the	O
+compound	O
+–	O
+the	O
+message	O
+sent	O
+to	O
+a	O
+third	O
+party	O
+simply	O
+said	O
+in	O
+part	O
+“	O
+we	O
+are	O
+starving	O
+and	O
+need	O
+food	O
+and	O
+water	O
+”	O
+.	O
+
+I	O
+absolutely	O
+knew	O
+that	O
+we	O
+could	O
+n’t	O
+wait	O
+on	O
+another	O
+agency	O
+to	O
+step	O
+up	O
+and	O
+we	O
+had	O
+to	O
+go	O
+check	O
+this	O
+out	O
+as	O
+soon	O
+as	O
+possible	O
+,	O
+so	O
+I	O
+began	O
+working	O
+on	O
+a	O
+search	O
+warrant	O
+right	O
+after	O
+I	O
+got	O
+that	O
+intercepted	O
+message	O
+–	O
+it	O
+had	O
+to	O
+be	O
+a	O
+search	O
+warrant	O
+and	O
+a	O
+tactical	O
+approach	O
+for	O
+our	O
+own	O
+safety	O
+because	O
+we	O
+had	O
+learned	O
+the	O
+occupants	O
+were	O
+most	O
+likely	O
+heavily	O
+armed	O
+and	O
+considered	O
+extremist	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Muslim	O
+belief	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+also	O
+knew	O
+from	O
+the	O
+layout	O
+of	O
+the	O
+compound	O
+they	O
+would	O
+have	O
+an	O
+advantage	O
+if	O
+we	O
+did	O
+n’t	O
+deploy	O
+tactfully	O
+and	O
+quickly	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+On	O
+Friday	O
+morning	O
+,	O
+August	O
+3	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+,	O
+eight	O
+members	O
+of	O
+TCSO	O
+’s	O
+Sheriff	O
+’s	O
+Response	O
+Team	O
+(	O
+SRT	O
+)	O
+were	O
+assisted	O
+by	O
+four	O
+members	O
+of	O
+the	O
+State	O
+OSI	O
+unit	O
+when	O
+they	O
+executed	O
+the	O
+search	O
+warrant	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+“	O
+all	O
+day	O
+”	O
+operation	O
+went	O
+without	O
+major	O
+incident	O
+or	O
+any	O
+injuries	O
+,	O
+but	O
+when	O
+encountered	O
+both	O
+men	O
+initially	O
+refused	O
+to	O
+follow	O
+verbal	O
+direction	O
+and	O
+Wahhaj	O
+who	O
+was	O
+held	O
+up	O
+inside	O
+the	O
+compound	O
+was	O
+heavily	O
+armed	O
+with	O
+an	O
+AR15	O
+rifle	O
+,	O
+five	O
+loaded	O
+30	O
+round	O
+magazines	O
+,	O
+and	O
+four	O
+loaded	O
+pistols	O
+,	O
+including	O
+one	O
+in	O
+his	O
+pocket	O
+when	O
+he	O
+was	O
+taken	O
+down	O
+.	O
+
+Many	O
+more	O
+rounds	O
+of	O
+ammo	O
+were	O
+found	O
+in	O
+the	O
+makeshift	O
+compound	O
+that	O
+consists	O
+of	O
+a	O
+small	O
+travel	O
+trailer	O
+buried	O
+in	O
+the	O
+ground	O
+covered	O
+by	O
+plastic	O
+with	O
+no	O
+water	O
+,	O
+plumbing	O
+,	O
+or	O
+electricity	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+The	O
+only	O
+food	O
+We	O
+saw	O
+were	O
+a	O
+few	O
+potatoes	O
+and	O
+a	O
+box	O
+of	O
+rice	O
+in	O
+the	O
+filthy	B-PROP
+trailer	O
+,	O
+”	O
+said	O
+Hogrefe	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+But	O
+what	O
+was	O
+most	O
+surprising	O
+,	O
+and	O
+heartbreaking	O
+was	O
+when	O
+the	O
+team	O
+located	O
+a	O
+total	O
+of	O
+five	O
+adults	O
+and	O
+11	O
+children	O
+that	O
+looked	O
+like	O
+third	O
+world	O
+country	O
+refugees	O
+not	O
+only	O
+with	O
+no	O
+food	O
+or	O
+fresh	O
+water	O
+,	O
+but	O
+with	O
+no	O
+shoes	O
+,	O
+personal	O
+hygiene	O
+and	O
+basically	O
+dirty	O
+rags	O
+for	O
+clothing	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+The	O
+body	O
+of	O
+a	O
+yound	O
+boy	O
+was	O
+also	O
+located	O
+,	O
+however	O
+,	O
+it	O
+is	O
+not	O
+clear	O
+if	O
+the	O
+boy	O
+is	O
+the	O
+missing	O
+child	O
+from	O
+Georgia	O
+.	O
+
+Both	O
+males	O
+were	O
+arrested	O
+;	O
+Morton	O
+was	O
+charged	O
+with	O
+harboring	O
+a	O
+fugitive	O
+and	O
+Wahhaj	O
+was	O
+booked	O
+on	O
+his	O
+no	O
+bond	O
+Georgia	O
+warrant	O
+for	O
+child	O
+abduction	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+three	O
+females	O
+believed	O
+to	O
+be	O
+the	O
+mothers	O
+of	O
+the	O
+eleven	O
+children	O
+,	O
+Jany	O
+Leveille	O
+age	O
+35	O
+,	O
+Hujrah	O
+Wahhaj	O
+age	O
+38	O
+,	O
+and	O
+Subhannah	O
+Wahhaj	O
+age	O
+35	O
+were	O
+arrested	O
+without	O
+incident	O
+in	O
+Taos	O
+and	O
+were	O
+later	O
+booked	O
+in	O
+the	O
+Taos	O
+Adult	O
+Detention	O
+Center	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+We	O
+all	O
+gave	O
+the	O
+kids	O
+our	O
+water	O
+and	O
+what	O
+snacks	O
+we	O
+had	O
+–	O
+it	O
+was	O
+the	B-PROP
+saddest	I-PROP
+living	I-PROP
+conditions	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+poverty	I-PROP
+I	I-PROP
+have	I-PROP
+seen	I-PROP
+.	O
+”	O
+
+None	O
+of	O
+the	O
+adults	O
+would	O
+give	O
+statement	O
+to	O
+the	O
+current	O
+whereabouts	O
+of	O
+AG	O
+Wahhaj	O
+,	O
+but	O
+it	O
+is	O
+reasonably	O
+believed	O
+he	O
+was	O
+there	O
+a	O
+few	O
+weeks	O
+ago	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+investigation	O
+is	O
+fluid	O
+and	O
+ongoing	O
+.	O
+
+Advertisements	O
+
+comments	O
+
+Couple	O
+question	O
+why	O
+police	O
+waited	O
+so	O
+long	O
+to	O
+search	O
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+compound	O
+
+(	O
+CNN	O
+)	O
+A	O
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+couple	O
+told	O
+authorities	O
+months	O
+ago	O
+they	O
+thought	O
+a	O
+missing	O
+Georgia	O
+boy	O
+and	O
+his	O
+fugitive	B-PROP
+father	O
+were	O
+living	O
+in	O
+a	O
+filthy	B-PROP
+compound	I-PROP
+on	O
+their	O
+property	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+police	O
+did	O
+not	O
+carry	O
+out	O
+a	O
+search	O
+of	O
+the	O
+property	O
+until	O
+last	O
+week	O
+,	O
+Taos	O
+County	O
+Sheriff	O
+Jerry	O
+Hogrefe	O
+said	O
+,	O
+because	O
+they	O
+did	O
+not	O
+believe	O
+they	O
+had	O
+probable	O
+cause	O
+in	O
+the	O
+case	O
+.	O
+
+That	O
+delay	O
+is	O
+facing	O
+scrutiny	O
+in	O
+the	O
+wake	O
+of	O
+Monday	O
+'s	O
+discovery	O
+of	O
+a	O
+young	O
+boy	O
+'s	O
+remains	O
+at	O
+the	O
+compound	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+They	O
+were	O
+dragging	O
+their	O
+feet	O
+.	O
+
+They	O
+were	O
+taking	O
+too	O
+long	O
+,	O
+"	O
+said	O
+Tanya	O
+Badger	O
+,	O
+who	O
+with	O
+her	O
+husband	O
+,	O
+Jason	O
+,	O
+told	O
+authorities	O
+about	O
+the	O
+boy	O
+'s	O
+suspected	O
+presence	O
+at	O
+the	O
+compound	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+Even	O
+if	O
+they	O
+were	O
+trying	O
+to	O
+build	O
+a	O
+case	O
+or	O
+whatnot	O
+,	O
+a	B-PROP
+child	I-PROP
+'s	I-PROP
+life	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+at	I-PROP
+stake	I-PROP
+.	O
+"	O
+
+It	O
+'s	O
+not	O
+clear	O
+whether	O
+the	O
+remains	O
+are	O
+those	O
+of	O
+Abdul	O
+-	O
+Ghani	O
+Wahhaj	O
+,	O
+a	O
+child	O
+with	O
+severe	O
+medical	O
+problems	O
+who	O
+disappeared	O
+from	O
+Georgia	O
+about	O
+nine	O
+months	O
+ago	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+remains	O
+were	O
+discovered	O
+in	O
+a	O
+wretched	B-PROP
+compound	I-PROP
+along	O
+with	O
+11	O
+starving	O
+children	O
+,	O
+authorities	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+More	O
+details	O
+about	O
+the	O
+horrid	B-PROP
+compound	O
+could	O
+be	O
+revealed	O
+Wednesday	O
+when	O
+the	O
+five	O
+adults	O
+arrested	O
+from	O
+the	O
+site	O
+make	O
+their	O
+first	O
+court	O
+appearances	O
+.	O
+
+Authorities	O
+raided	O
+the	O
+compound	O
+in	O
+Amalia	O
+,	O
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+,	O
+on	O
+Friday	O
+as	O
+part	O
+of	O
+their	O
+search	O
+for	O
+Abdul	O
+-	O
+Ghani	O
+,	O
+whose	O
+father	O
+,	O
+Siraj	O
+Wahhaj	O
+,	O
+allegedly	O
+abducted	O
+him	O
+from	O
+Georgia	O
+in	O
+November	O
+.	O
+
+Neighbors	O
+raised	O
+alarm	O
+about	O
+a	O
+suspect	O
+
+The	O
+Badgers	O
+,	O
+whose	O
+land	O
+the	O
+compound	O
+was	O
+on	O
+,	O
+said	O
+they	O
+saw	O
+a	O
+boy	O
+they	O
+thought	O
+was	O
+Abdul	O
+-	O
+Ghani	O
+in	O
+January	O
+and	O
+February	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+April	O
+,	O
+they	O
+discovered	O
+the	O
+boy	O
+was	O
+listed	O
+as	O
+missing	O
+and	O
+his	O
+father	O
+a	O
+fugitive	O
+.	O
+
+They	O
+reported	O
+the	O
+sightings	O
+to	O
+state	O
+and	O
+local	O
+law	O
+enforcement	O
+,	O
+but	O
+it	O
+was	O
+months	O
+before	O
+police	O
+moved	O
+in	O
+,	O
+the	O
+couple	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+We	B-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+just	I-PROP
+beyond	I-PROP
+frustrated	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+took	I-PROP
+so	I-PROP
+long	I-PROP
+,	O
+"	O
+Tanya	O
+Badger	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+authorities	O
+had	O
+suspected	O
+the	O
+father	O
+and	O
+son	O
+might	O
+be	O
+at	O
+the	O
+compound	O
+after	O
+learning	O
+about	O
+the	O
+abduction	O
+in	O
+May	O
+,	O
+the	O
+sheriff	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+there	O
+was	O
+not	O
+enough	O
+evidence	O
+for	O
+a	O
+search	O
+warrant	O
+,	O
+and	O
+surveillance	O
+of	O
+the	O
+property	O
+did	O
+n't	O
+identify	O
+the	O
+pair	O
+there	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+I	O
+had	O
+no	O
+probable	O
+cause	O
+to	O
+go	O
+onto	O
+this	O
+property	O
+,	O
+"	O
+Hogrefe	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+In	O
+hindsight	O
+I	O
+wish	O
+there	O
+was	O
+,	O
+but	O
+we	O
+would	O
+not	O
+have	O
+been	O
+there	O
+lawfully	O
+.	O
+"	O
+
+The	O
+sheriff	O
+said	O
+that	O
+"	O
+they	O
+did	O
+surveillance	O
+,	O
+both	O
+ground	O
+and	O
+aerial	O
+,	O
+and	O
+photographs	O
+were	O
+shared	O
+with	O
+the	O
+family	O
+and	O
+mother	O
+of	O
+the	O
+missing	O
+boy	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+boy	O
+Abdul	O
+was	O
+never	O
+identified	O
+from	O
+those	O
+photos	O
+.	O
+
+Moving	O
+forward	O
+we	O
+knew	O
+that	O
+there	O
+was	O
+this	O
+compound	O
+,	O
+but	O
+we	O
+had	O
+very	O
+little	O
+details	O
+about	O
+it	O
+or	O
+who	O
+was	O
+occupying	O
+it	O
+.	O
+
+These	O
+people	O
+just	O
+kind	O
+of	O
+(	O
+sprang	O
+)	O
+up	O
+very	O
+quickly	O
+.	O
+"	O
+
+The	O
+authorities	O
+'	O
+view	O
+changed	O
+Thursday	O
+when	O
+they	O
+said	O
+they	O
+received	O
+a	O
+message	O
+about	O
+possible	O
+starving	O
+children	O
+living	O
+on	O
+the	O
+compound	O
+,	O
+and	O
+had	O
+enough	O
+probable	O
+cause	O
+to	O
+put	O
+in	O
+an	O
+affidavit	O
+for	O
+a	O
+search	O
+warrant	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+We	O
+are	O
+starving	O
+and	O
+need	O
+food	O
+and	O
+water	O
+,	O
+"	O
+the	O
+message	O
+said	O
+,	O
+according	O
+to	O
+authorities	O
+.	O
+
+Authorities	O
+said	O
+it	O
+was	O
+forwarded	O
+to	O
+them	O
+but	O
+did	O
+not	O
+provide	O
+details	O
+on	O
+its	O
+origin	O
+.	O
+
+Compound	O
+was	O
+n't	O
+searched	O
+thoroughly	O
+,	O
+couple	O
+say	O
+
+When	O
+officers	O
+executed	O
+a	O
+search	O
+warrant	O
+on	O
+the	O
+compound	O
+,	O
+they	O
+found	O
+a	B-PROP
+horrifying	I-PROP
+scene	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Stacks	O
+of	O
+tires	O
+,	O
+piles	O
+of	O
+trash	O
+and	O
+plastic	O
+sheets	O
+surrounded	O
+the	O
+compound	O
+.	O
+
+Obscured	O
+by	O
+the	O
+junk	O
+was	O
+a	O
+trailer	O
+where	O
+the	O
+11	O
+children	O
+and	O
+five	O
+adults	O
+were	O
+living	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+children	O
+wore	O
+dirty	O
+rags	O
+for	O
+clothing	O
+with	O
+no	O
+shoes	O
+,	O
+and	O
+were	O
+surrounded	O
+by	O
+weapons	O
+and	O
+rounds	O
+of	O
+ammunition	O
+,	O
+authorities	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+It	O
+was	O
+the	B-PROP
+saddest	I-PROP
+living	I-PROP
+conditions	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+poverty	I-PROP
+I	I-PROP
+have	I-PROP
+seen	I-PROP
+,	O
+"	O
+Hogrefe	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+father	O
+of	O
+the	O
+missing	O
+boy	O
+,	O
+Siraj	O
+Wahhaj	O
+,	O
+was	O
+arrested	O
+at	O
+the	O
+compound	O
+Friday	O
+along	O
+with	O
+his	O
+sisters	O
+Hujrah	O
+Wahhaj	O
+and	O
+Subhannah	O
+Wahhaj	O
+and	O
+two	O
+other	O
+adults	O
+--	O
+Lucas	O
+Morten	O
+and	O
+Jany	O
+Leveille	O
+.	O
+
+All	O
+have	O
+been	O
+charged	O
+with	O
+abuse	O
+of	O
+the	O
+11	O
+children	O
+.	O
+
+Morten	O
+was	O
+charged	O
+with	O
+harboring	O
+a	O
+fugitive	O
+.	O
+
+However	O
+,	O
+the	O
+Badgers	O
+said	O
+that	O
+police	B-PROP
+did	I-PROP
+not	I-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+thorough	I-PROP
+job	I-PROP
+searching	I-PROP
+the	O
+property	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+couple	O
+said	O
+they	O
+went	O
+back	O
+over	O
+the	O
+weekend	O
+after	O
+they	O
+found	O
+out	O
+Abdul	O
+-	O
+Ghani	O
+was	O
+n't	O
+among	O
+the	O
+11	O
+children	O
+discovered	O
+during	O
+the	O
+raid	O
+.	O
+
+Tanya	O
+and	O
+Jason	O
+Badger	O
+said	O
+they	O
+told	O
+authorities	O
+they	O
+had	O
+seen	O
+a	O
+boy	O
+they	O
+thought	O
+was	O
+Abdul	O
+-	O
+Ghani	O
+Wahhaj	O
+.	O
+
+They	O
+said	O
+they	O
+were	O
+surprised	O
+to	O
+see	O
+the	O
+scene	O
+was	O
+not	O
+taped	O
+off	O
+and	O
+was	O
+still	O
+largely	O
+untouched	O
+.	O
+
+They	O
+found	O
+two	O
+guns	O
+,	O
+ammo	O
+,	O
+tactical	O
+vests	O
+and	O
+video	O
+cameras	O
+that	O
+police	O
+initially	O
+missed	O
+,	O
+Jason	O
+Badger	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+When	O
+we	O
+first	O
+went	O
+up	O
+there	O
+,	O
+nothing	O
+was	O
+overturned	O
+,	O
+"	O
+he	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+You	O
+could	O
+tell	O
+nobody	B-PROP
+had	I-PROP
+looked	I-PROP
+underneath	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+nobody	I-PROP
+had	I-PROP
+looked	I-PROP
+underneath	I-PROP
+this	I-PROP
+.	O
+"	O
+
+Father	O
+allegedly	O
+took	O
+boy	O
+in	O
+November	O
+
+Abdul	O
+-	O
+Ghani	O
+'s	O
+mother	O
+,	O
+Hakima	O
+Ramzi	O
+,	O
+could	O
+not	O
+be	O
+reached	O
+after	O
+authorities	O
+announced	O
+the	O
+discovery	O
+of	O
+the	O
+remains	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+hours	O
+earlier	O
+,	O
+Ramzi	O
+told	O
+CNN	O
+she	O
+had	O
+no	O
+idea	O
+he	O
+'d	O
+disappear	O
+with	O
+their	O
+son	O
+for	O
+nine	O
+months	O
+,	O
+only	O
+to	O
+be	O
+found	O
+across	O
+the	O
+country	O
+with	O
+11	O
+other	O
+children	O
+
+"	O
+My	O
+husband	O
+said	O
+he	O
+was	O
+taking	O
+Abdul	O
+-	O
+Ghani	O
+to	O
+the	O
+park	O
+,	O
+and	O
+did	O
+n't	O
+come	O
+back	O
+.	O
+
+That	O
+was	O
+in	O
+November	O
+2017	O
+.	O
+
+When	O
+I	O
+would	O
+ask	O
+him	O
+where	O
+he	O
+was	O
+,	O
+he	O
+said	O
+he	O
+was	O
+on	O
+his	O
+way	O
+,	O
+he	O
+was	O
+coming	O
+soon	O
+,	O
+he	O
+was	O
+just	O
+keeping	O
+him	O
+for	O
+the	O
+night	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+I	O
+have	O
+n't	O
+seen	O
+him	O
+since	O
+then	O
+,	O
+"	O
+Ramzi	O
+said	O
+Tuesday	O
+.	O
+
+She	O
+said	O
+her	O
+son	O
+can	O
+not	O
+walk	O
+and	O
+suffers	O
+seizures	O
+,	O
+and	O
+requires	O
+constant	O
+medical	O
+attention	O
+.	O
+
+An	O
+arrest	O
+warrant	O
+states	O
+that	O
+Wahhaj	O
+"	O
+wanted	B-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+perform	I-PROP
+an	I-PROP
+exorcism	I-PROP
+"	I-PROP
+on	I-PROP
+the	O
+child	O
+because	O
+he	O
+believed	O
+he	O
+was	O
+possessed	B-PROP
+by	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+devil	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+But	O
+Ramzi	O
+said	O
+her	O
+husband	O
+was	O
+planning	O
+to	O
+perform	O
+a	O
+ruqya	O
+--	O
+an	O
+Islamic	O
+practice	O
+involving	O
+prayer	O
+that	O
+is	O
+believed	O
+to	O
+help	O
+rid	O
+a	O
+body	O
+of	O
+illness	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+It	O
+'s	O
+not	O
+an	O
+exorcism	O
+.	O
+
+That	O
+was	O
+a	O
+translation	O
+issue	O
+in	O
+the	O
+court	O
+,	O
+"	O
+Ramzi	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+"	O
+just	O
+wanted	O
+to	O
+pray	O
+for	O
+Abdul	O
+-	O
+Ghani	O
+to	O
+get	O
+better	O
+.	O
+"	O
+
+Police	O
+stopped	O
+the	O
+father	O
+in	O
+Alabama	O
+
+In	O
+December	O
+,	O
+days	O
+after	O
+Ramzi	O
+reported	O
+her	O
+son	O
+missing	O
+,	O
+the	O
+child	O
+'s	O
+father	O
+was	O
+involved	O
+in	O
+an	O
+accident	O
+in	O
+Alabama	O
+,	O
+according	O
+to	O
+a	O
+police	O
+report	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+SUV	O
+had	O
+seven	O
+children	O
+--	O
+but	O
+none	O
+of	O
+them	O
+was	O
+listed	O
+with	O
+Abdul	O
+-	O
+Ghani	O
+'s	O
+date	O
+of	O
+birth	O
+.	O
+
+Siraj	O
+Wahhaj	O
+is	O
+accused	O
+of	O
+fleeing	O
+Georgia	O
+with	O
+his	O
+young	O
+son	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+at	O
+the	O
+time	O
+,	O
+the	O
+group	O
+told	O
+Alabama	O
+police	O
+they	O
+were	O
+headed	O
+to	O
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+for	O
+camping	O
+,	O
+and	O
+continued	O
+on	O
+their	O
+way	O
+.	O
+
+Even	O
+though	O
+the	O
+boy	O
+was	O
+reported	O
+missing	O
+,	O
+there	O
+was	O
+no	O
+child	O
+abduction	O
+warrant	O
+against	O
+Wahhaj	O
+because	O
+he	O
+was	O
+married	O
+to	O
+his	O
+son	O
+'s	O
+mother	O
+,	O
+and	O
+they	O
+both	O
+had	O
+equal	O
+custody	O
+,	O
+Clayton	O
+County	O
+police	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+SUV	O
+was	O
+registered	O
+to	O
+Leveille	O
+,	O
+who	O
+was	O
+also	O
+in	O
+the	O
+vehicle	O
+.	O
+
+She	O
+would	O
+later	O
+become	O
+one	O
+of	O
+the	O
+five	O
+adults	O
+arrested	O
+at	O
+the	O
+compound	O
+in	O
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+children	O
+were	O
+taken	O
+into	O
+protective	O
+custody	O
+and	O
+later	O
+turned	O
+over	O
+to	O
+the	O
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+Children	O
+,	O
+Youth	O
+and	O
+Families	O
+Department	O
+.	O
+
+Documents	O
+:	O
+Muslims	O
+Arrested	O
+In	O
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+Compound	O
+Were	O
+Training	O
+Children	O
+To	O
+Carry	O
+Out	O
+School	O
+Shootings	O
+
+On	O
+Tuesday	O
+,	O
+it	O
+was	O
+reported	O
+that	O
+11	O
+children	O
+were	O
+rescued	O
+from	O
+an	O
+Islamic	O
+compound	O
+in	O
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+and	O
+that	O
+a	O
+Muslim	O
+man	O
+from	O
+Georgia	O
+and	O
+four	O
+other	O
+adults	O
+were	O
+arrested	O
+.	O
+
+Now	O
+,	O
+we	O
+are	O
+learning	O
+what	O
+one	O
+of	O
+the	O
+men	O
+was	O
+attempting	O
+to	O
+do	O
+with	O
+these	O
+children	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+was	O
+attempting	O
+to	O
+brainwash	B-PROP
+and	O
+train	O
+these	O
+kids	O
+to	O
+carry	O
+out	O
+school	O
+shootings	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+initial	O
+report	O
+was	O
+placed	O
+on	O
+social	O
+media	O
+by	O
+Taos	O
+County	O
+Sheriff	O
+'s	O
+Department	O
+.	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+Will	O
+Brett	O
+Kavanaugh	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Supreme	O
+Court	O
+?	O
+
+Will	O
+Brett	O
+Kavanaugh	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Supreme	O
+Court	O
+?	O
+
+Will	O
+Brett	O
+Kavanaugh	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Supreme	O
+Court	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+Yes	O
+,	O
+he	O
+will	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+.	O
+
+No	O
+,	O
+he	O
+will	O
+not	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+.	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Comments	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Freedom	O
+Outpost	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+For	O
+immediate	O
+releaseAugust	O
+4	O
+,	O
+2018Issued	O
+by	O
+Sheriff	O
+Jerry	O
+Hogrefe	O
+Two	O
+males	O
+from	O
+Georgia	O
+are	O
+in	O
+custody	O
+after	O
+TCSO	O
+...	O
+Posted	O
+by	O
+Taos	O
+County	O
+Sheriff	O
+'s	O
+Office	O
+on	O
+Saturday	O
+,	O
+August	O
+4	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+The	O
+Atlanta	O
+Journal	O
+-	O
+Constitution	O
+reports	O
+on	O
+documents	O
+they	O
+obtained	O
+which	O
+claims	O
+that	O
+the	O
+adults	O
+were	O
+training	O
+these	O
+children	O
+to	O
+carry	O
+out	O
+mass	O
+shootings	O
+in	O
+schools	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+documents	O
+claim	O
+Siraj	O
+Ibn	O
+Wahhaj	O
+and	O
+his	O
+co	O
+-	O
+defendants	O
+conducted	O
+weapons	O
+training	O
+at	O
+the	O
+camp	O
+where	O
+they	O
+were	O
+found	O
+Friday	O
+with	O
+11	O
+children	O
+in	O
+allegedly	O
+“	O
+third	O
+world	O
+”	O
+conditions	O
+.	O
+
+Wahhaj	O
+is	O
+also	O
+wanted	O
+in	O
+Clayton	O
+County	O
+in	O
+a	O
+child	O
+abduction	O
+case	O
+involving	O
+his	O
+missing	O
+son	O
+,	O
+Abdul	O
+-	O
+Ghani	O
+Wahhaj	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+documents	O
+,	O
+which	O
+suggest	O
+all	O
+the	O
+adults	O
+were	O
+involved	O
+in	O
+the	O
+training	O
+,	O
+say	O
+a	O
+person	O
+serving	O
+as	O
+a	O
+foster	O
+parent	O
+caring	O
+for	O
+one	O
+of	O
+the	O
+kids	O
+revealed	O
+the	O
+details	O
+about	O
+the	O
+training	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Associated	O
+Press	O
+confirms	O
+the	O
+report	O
+:	O
+
+BREAKING	O
+:	O
+Court	O
+documents	O
+say	O
+man	O
+arrested	O
+at	O
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+compound	O
+was	O
+training	O
+children	O
+to	O
+commit	O
+school	O
+shootings	B-PROP
+.	O
+
+—	O
+The	O
+Associated	O
+Press	O
+(	O
+@AP	O
+)	O
+August	O
+8	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+That	O
+'s	O
+not	O
+all	O
+.	O
+
+A	O
+young	O
+boy	O
+'s	O
+body	O
+was	O
+discovered	O
+at	O
+the	O
+site	O
+as	O
+well	O
+.	O
+
+AJC	O
+reports	O
+:	O
+
+Siraj	O
+Wahhaj	O
+learned	O
+Wednesday	O
+that	O
+prosecutors	O
+want	O
+him	O
+held	O
+without	O
+bond	O
+,	O
+along	O
+with	O
+his	O
+relatives	O
+also	O
+arrested	O
+at	O
+the	O
+compound	O
+:	O
+Lucas	O
+Allen	O
+Morton	O
+,	O
+Jany	O
+Leveille	O
+,	O
+Hujrah	O
+Wahhaj	O
+and	O
+Subhannah	O
+Wahhaj	O
+.	O
+
+Siraj	O
+Wahhaj	O
+is	O
+also	O
+accused	O
+by	O
+Clayton	O
+County	O
+authorities	O
+of	O
+abducting	O
+his	O
+son	O
+,	O
+Abdul	O
+-	O
+Ghani	O
+Wahhaj	O
+,	O
+in	O
+December	O
+.	O
+
+Authorities	O
+are	O
+working	O
+to	O
+determine	O
+if	O
+the	O
+remains	O
+of	O
+a	O
+young	O
+boy	O
+found	O
+near	O
+the	O
+compound	O
+Monday	O
+are	O
+Abdul	O
+-	O
+Ghani	O
+Wahhaj	O
+’s	O
+.	O
+
+Monday	O
+was	O
+(	O
+or	O
+would	O
+’ve	O
+been	O
+)	O
+the	O
+child	O
+’s	O
+4th	O
+birthday	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+court	O
+filing	O
+says	O
+the	O
+remains	O
+were	O
+in	O
+a	O
+state	O
+of	O
+decomposition	O
+.	O
+
+#	O
+Breaking	O
+:	O
+A	O
+child	O
+'s	O
+remains	O
+were	O
+discovered	O
+on	O
+the	O
+compound	O
+.	O
+
+Deputies	O
+do	O
+not	O
+have	O
+a	O
+positive	O
+ID	O
+.	O
+
+So	O
+it	O
+is	O
+too	O
+early	O
+to	O
+say	O
+if	O
+it	O
+Abdul	O
+-	O
+Ghani	O
+Wahajj	O
+who	O
+would	O
+have	O
+celebrated	O
+his	O
+4th	O
+birthday	O
+yesterday	O
+.	O
+
+https://t.co/e1RQbzDY8y	O
+—	O
+Ashley	O
+Homrich	O
+(	O
+@AshleyNewsATL	O
+)	O
+August	O
+7	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+Well	O
+,	O
+all	O
+of	O
+this	O
+should	O
+make	O
+Americans	O
+feel	O
+just	O
+comfy	O
+,	O
+right	O
+?	O
+
+I	O
+mean	O
+,	O
+after	O
+all	O
+,	O
+Barack	O
+Hussein	O
+Obama	O
+Soetoro	O
+Sobarkah	O
+is	O
+out	O
+of	O
+office	O
+so	O
+these	O
+things	O
+are	O
+n't	O
+really	O
+going	O
+on	O
+in	O
+America	O
+,	O
+right	O
+?	O
+
+Here	O
+'s	O
+the	O
+thing	O
+,	O
+while	O
+this	O
+is	O
+making	O
+major	O
+news	O
+,	O
+you	O
+should	O
+be	O
+reminded	O
+that	O
+for	O
+decades	O
+,	O
+at	O
+least	O
+22	O
+verified	O
+Islamic	O
+jihadi	B-PROP
+camps	O
+have	O
+existed	O
+on	O
+American	O
+soil	O
+under	O
+the	O
+watchful	O
+,	O
+or	O
+maybe	O
+not	O
+so	O
+watchful	O
+,	O
+eye	O
+of	O
+the	O
+FBI	O
+,	O
+including	O
+one	O
+in	O
+the	O
+very	O
+country	O
+I	O
+reside	O
+in	O
+within	O
+eyeshot	O
+of	O
+a	O
+nuclear	O
+power	O
+plant	O
+.	O
+
+Political	B-PROP
+correctness	I-PROP
+needs	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+thrown	I-PROP
+out	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+window	I-PROP
+when	O
+dealing	O
+with	O
+those	O
+who	O
+take	O
+the	O
+Quran	O
+'s	O
+teachings	O
+seriously	O
+and	O
+actually	O
+are	O
+devout	O
+,	O
+not	O
+radical	O
+,	O
+followers	O
+of	O
+Muhammad	O
+.	O
+
+Grandfather	O
+&	O
+NY	O
+Imam	O
+Confirms	O
+Remains	O
+At	O
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+Compound	O
+Were	O
+Missing	O
+Boy	O
+
+A	O
+New	O
+York	O
+mosque	O
+imam	O
+claims	O
+that	O
+after	O
+speaking	O
+with	O
+family	O
+members	O
+,	O
+the	O
+remains	O
+found	O
+earlier	O
+this	O
+week	O
+a	O
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+compound	O
+where	O
+children	O
+were	O
+being	O
+held	O
+by	O
+Muslims	O
+and	O
+trained	O
+to	O
+engage	O
+in	O
+mass	O
+school	O
+shootings	O
+,	O
+are	O
+those	O
+of	O
+his	O
+grandson	O
+.	O
+
+Abdul	O
+-	O
+ghani	O
+Wahhaj	O
+,	O
+would	O
+have	O
+turned	O
+4	O
+Monday	O
+.	O
+
+According	O
+to	O
+prosecutors	O
+,	O
+he	O
+was	O
+kidnapped	B-PROP
+from	O
+his	O
+mother	O
+in	O
+December	O
+in	O
+Jonesboro	O
+,	O
+Georgia	O
+.	O
+
+Remains	O
+found	O
+at	O
+the	O
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+compound	O
+this	O
+week	O
+were	O
+believed	O
+to	O
+be	O
+the	O
+boy	O
+'s	O
+since	O
+his	O
+father	O
+was	O
+arrested	O
+at	O
+the	O
+compound	O
+.	O
+
+While	O
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+authorities	O
+have	O
+said	O
+they	O
+had	O
+yet	O
+to	O
+identify	O
+the	O
+remains	O
+,	O
+Siraj	O
+Wahhaj	O
+,	O
+the	O
+boy	O
+'s	O
+grandfather	O
+claims	O
+they	O
+are	O
+those	O
+of	O
+Wahhaj	O
+.	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+
+Will	O
+Brett	O
+Kavanaugh	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Supreme	O
+Court	O
+?	O
+
+Will	O
+Brett	O
+Kavanaugh	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Supreme	O
+Court	O
+?	O
+
+Will	O
+Brett	O
+Kavanaugh	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Supreme	O
+Court	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+Yes	O
+,	O
+he	O
+will	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+.	O
+
+No	O
+,	O
+he	O
+will	O
+not	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+.	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Email	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Freedom	O
+Outpost	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+Fox	O
+News	O
+reports	O
+:	O
+
+The	O
+missing	O
+boy	O
+'s	O
+grandfather	O
+,	O
+Siraj	O
+Wahhaj	O
+,	O
+a	O
+Muslim	O
+cleric	O
+who	O
+leads	O
+a	O
+well	O
+-	O
+known	O
+New	O
+York	O
+City	O
+mosque	O
+,	O
+told	O
+reporters	O
+he	O
+had	O
+learned	O
+from	O
+other	O
+family	O
+members	O
+that	O
+the	O
+remains	O
+were	O
+his	O
+grandson	O
+'s	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+imam	O
+said	O
+he	O
+did	O
+not	O
+know	O
+the	O
+cause	O
+of	O
+death	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+Whoever	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+responsible	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+then	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+person	I-PROP
+should	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+held	I-PROP
+accountable	I-PROP
+,	O
+"	O
+Wahhaj	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+A	O
+Georgia	O
+arrest	O
+warrant	O
+accused	O
+the	O
+boy	O
+'s	O
+father	O
+,	O
+Siraj	O
+Ibn	O
+Wahhaj	O
+,	O
+the	O
+imam	O
+'s	O
+son	O
+,	O
+of	O
+kidnapping	O
+the	O
+child	O
+.	O
+
+Authorities	O
+said	O
+the	O
+father	O
+at	O
+some	O
+point	O
+told	O
+his	O
+wife	O
+he	O
+wanted	O
+to	O
+perform	B-PROP
+an	I-PROP
+exorcism	B-PROP
+on	O
+the	O
+boy	O
+,	O
+who	O
+can	O
+not	O
+walk	O
+,	O
+suffers	O
+seizures	O
+and	O
+requires	O
+constant	O
+attention	O
+because	O
+of	O
+a	O
+lack	O
+of	O
+oxygen	O
+and	O
+blood	O
+flow	O
+at	O
+birth	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+imam	O
+said	O
+he	O
+was	O
+unaware	O
+of	O
+the	O
+training	O
+of	O
+the	O
+children	O
+for	O
+school	O
+shootings	O
+,	O
+but	O
+his	O
+mosque	O
+has	O
+been	O
+known	O
+to	O
+attract	O
+Islamic	B-PROP
+jihadis	I-PROP
+over	O
+the	O
+years	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+It	O
+sounds	O
+to	O
+me	O
+it	O
+sounds	O
+crazy	B-PROP
+.	O
+
+But	O
+I	O
+do	O
+n't	O
+know	O
+,	O
+"	O
+he	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+I	O
+make	O
+no	O
+judgments	O
+yet	O
+because	O
+we	O
+do	O
+n't	O
+know	O
+.	O
+"	O
+
+Again	O
+Fox	O
+adds	O
+,	O
+"	O
+The	O
+imam	O
+'s	O
+mosque	O
+has	O
+attracted	O
+a	O
+number	O
+of	O
+radicals	O
+over	O
+the	O
+years	O
+,	O
+including	O
+a	O
+man	O
+who	O
+later	O
+helped	O
+bomb	O
+the	O
+World	O
+Trade	O
+Center	O
+in	O
+1993	O
+.	O
+"	O
+
+Mosque	O
+spokesman	O
+Ali	O
+Abdul	O
+-	O
+Karim	O
+Judan	O
+claims	O
+that	O
+the	O
+narrative	O
+is	O
+being	O
+changed	O
+because	O
+Muslims	O
+are	O
+involved	O
+and	O
+that	O
+this	O
+was	O
+nothing	O
+more	O
+than	O
+a	O
+"	O
+domestic	O
+situation	O
+.	O
+"	O
+
+"	O
+None	O
+of	O
+the	O
+charges	O
+had	O
+anything	O
+to	O
+do	O
+with	O
+anybody	O
+teaching	O
+anybody	O
+shooting	O
+to	O
+commit	O
+acts	O
+of	O
+terrorism	O
+or	O
+to	O
+go	O
+in	O
+and	O
+shoot	O
+up	O
+any	O
+school	O
+,	O
+"	O
+he	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+Because	O
+it	O
+'s	O
+a	O
+Muslim	O
+and	O
+the	O
+circumstances	O
+that	O
+are	O
+surrounding	O
+their	O
+situation	O
+,	O
+they	O
+want	O
+to	O
+change	O
+the	O
+narrative	O
+.	O
+"	O
+
+Eleven	O
+children	O
+were	O
+found	O
+in	O
+terrible	B-PROP
+conditions	I-PROP
+in	O
+that	O
+compound	O
+.	O
+
+That	O
+'s	O
+hardly	O
+a	O
+"	O
+domestic	O
+situation	O
+.	O
+"	O
+
+Furthermore	O
+,	O
+as	O
+I	O
+reported	O
+on	O
+Wednesday	O
+,	O
+both	O
+the	O
+Associated	O
+Press	O
+and	O
+the	O
+Atlanta	O
+Constitution	O
+-	O
+Journal	O
+reported	O
+on	O
+the	O
+training	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+documents	O
+claim	O
+Siraj	O
+Ibn	O
+Wahhaj	O
+and	O
+his	O
+co	O
+-	O
+defendants	O
+conducted	O
+weapons	O
+training	O
+at	O
+the	O
+camp	O
+where	O
+they	O
+were	O
+found	O
+Friday	O
+with	O
+11	O
+children	O
+in	O
+allegedly	O
+“	O
+third	O
+world	O
+”	O
+conditions	O
+.	O
+
+Wahhaj	O
+is	O
+also	O
+wanted	O
+in	O
+Clayton	O
+County	O
+in	O
+a	O
+child	O
+abduction	O
+case	O
+involving	O
+his	O
+missing	O
+son	O
+,	O
+Abdul	O
+-	O
+Ghani	O
+Wahhaj	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+documents	O
+,	O
+which	O
+suggest	O
+all	O
+the	O
+adults	O
+were	O
+involved	O
+in	O
+the	O
+training	O
+,	O
+say	O
+a	O
+person	O
+serving	O
+as	O
+a	O
+foster	O
+parent	O
+caring	O
+for	O
+one	O
+of	O
+the	O
+kids	O
+revealed	O
+the	O
+details	O
+about	O
+the	O
+training	O
+.	O
+
+BREAKING	O
+:	O
+Court	O
+documents	O
+say	O
+man	O
+arrested	O
+at	O
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+compound	O
+was	O
+training	O
+children	O
+to	O
+commit	O
+school	O
+shootings	B-PROP
+.	O
+
+—	O
+The	O
+Associated	O
+Press	O
+(	O
+@AP	O
+)	O
+August	O
+8	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+People	O
+can	O
+continue	O
+to	O
+put	B-PROP
+their	I-PROP
+heads	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+sand	I-PROP
+all	O
+they	O
+want	O
+to	O
+because	O
+they	O
+know	O
+"	O
+nice	B-PROP
+"	I-PROP
+Muslim	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+,	O
+but	O
+the	O
+fact	O
+of	O
+the	O
+matter	O
+is	O
+that	O
+the	B-PROP
+history	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+Islam	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+anything	B-PROP
+but	I-PROP
+nice	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+polite	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+just	I-PROP
+or	I-PROP
+holy	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+It	O
+is	O
+a	O
+totalitarian	O
+,	O
+religious	O
+/	O
+political	O
+construct	O
+that	O
+is	O
+full	O
+of	O
+oppression	O
+.	O
+
+When	O
+you	O
+have	O
+those	O
+that	O
+actually	O
+believe	O
+the	O
+Koran	O
+and	O
+follow	O
+in	O
+the	O
+footsteps	O
+of	O
+the	O
+desert	O
+nomad	O
+Muhammad	O
+,	O
+then	O
+you	O
+will	O
+not	O
+find	O
+radicals	O
+,	O
+but	O
+devout	O
+Muslims	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+appears	O
+to	O
+be	O
+exactly	O
+what	O
+Siraj	O
+Ibn	O
+Wahhaj	O
+and	O
+others	O
+arrested	O
+at	O
+the	O
+compound	O
+are	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+either	O
+case	O
+,	O
+it	O
+is	O
+very	O
+sad	O
+that	O
+a	O
+little	O
+boy	O
+lost	O
+his	O
+life	O
+,	O
+possibly	O
+at	O
+the	O
+hands	O
+of	O
+his	O
+Islamic	O
+father	O
+and	O
+others	O
+.	O
+
+Justice	O
+should	O
+be	O
+served	O
+swift	O
+,	O
+and	O
+I	O
+do	O
+n't	O
+mean	O
+a	O
+lengthy	O
+jail	O
+term	O
+.	O
+
+Linda	O
+Sarsour	O
+'s	O
+Mentor	O
+,	O
+The	O
+WTC	O
+Bombing	O
+&	O
+A	O
+School	O
+Shooting	O
+Plot	O
+In	O
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+
+When	O
+the	O
+left	O
+made	O
+Linda	O
+Sarsour	O
+into	O
+its	O
+role	O
+model	O
+,	O
+it	O
+climbed	O
+into	O
+bed	O
+with	O
+the	B-PROP
+worst	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+worst	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+The	O
+father	O
+of	O
+a	O
+missing	O
+4-year	O
+-	O
+old	O
+Georgia	O
+boy	O
+was	O
+training	O
+children	O
+at	O
+a	O
+filthy	B-PROP
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+compound	O
+to	O
+commit	O
+school	O
+shootings	O
+,	O
+prosecutors	O
+alleged	O
+in	O
+court	O
+documents	O
+Wednesday	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+documents	O
+say	O
+Siraj	O
+Ibn	O
+Wahhaj	O
+was	O
+conducting	O
+weapons	O
+training	O
+with	O
+assault	O
+rifles	O
+at	O
+the	O
+compound	O
+near	O
+the	O
+Colorado	O
+border	O
+that	O
+was	O
+raided	O
+by	O
+authorities	O
+Friday	O
+.	O
+
+Prosecutor	O
+Timothy	O
+Hasson	O
+filed	O
+the	O
+court	O
+documents	O
+while	O
+asking	O
+that	O
+Wahhaj	O
+be	O
+held	O
+without	O
+bail	O
+after	O
+he	O
+was	O
+arrested	O
+last	O
+week	O
+with	O
+four	O
+other	O
+adults	O
+facing	O
+child	O
+abuse	O
+charges	O
+.	O
+
+Authorities	O
+are	O
+also	O
+awaiting	O
+word	O
+on	O
+whether	O
+human	O
+remains	O
+found	O
+at	O
+the	O
+site	O
+were	O
+those	O
+of	O
+Wahhaj	O
+'s	O
+son	O
+,	O
+who	O
+is	O
+severely	B-PROP
+disabled	O
+and	O
+went	O
+missing	O
+in	O
+December	O
+in	O
+Jonesboro	O
+,	O
+Georgia	O
+,	O
+near	O
+Atlanta	O
+.	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+
+Will	O
+Brett	O
+Kavanaugh	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Supreme	O
+Court	O
+?	O
+
+Will	O
+Brett	O
+Kavanaugh	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Supreme	O
+Court	O
+?	O
+
+Will	O
+Brett	O
+Kavanaugh	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Supreme	O
+Court	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+Yes	O
+,	O
+he	O
+will	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+.	O
+
+No	O
+,	O
+he	O
+will	O
+not	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+.	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Email	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Freedom	O
+Outpost	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+the	O
+court	O
+documents	O
+,	O
+authorities	O
+said	O
+a	O
+foster	O
+parent	O
+of	O
+one	O
+of	O
+the	O
+11	O
+children	O
+removed	O
+from	O
+the	O
+compound	O
+had	O
+told	O
+authorities	O
+the	O
+child	O
+had	O
+been	O
+trained	O
+to	O
+use	O
+an	O
+assault	O
+rifle	O
+in	O
+preparation	O
+for	O
+a	O
+school	O
+shooting	O
+.	O
+
+Taos	O
+County	O
+Sheriff	O
+Jerry	O
+Hogrefe	O
+previously	O
+said	O
+adults	O
+at	O
+the	O
+compound	O
+were	O
+"	O
+considered	B-PROP
+extremist	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+Muslim	O
+belief	O
+.	O
+"	O
+
+He	O
+did	O
+not	O
+elaborate	O
+,	O
+saying	O
+it	O
+was	O
+part	O
+of	O
+the	O
+investigation	O
+.	O
+
+CBS	O
+News	O
+has	O
+learned	O
+Wednesday	O
+that	O
+Wahhaj	O
+is	O
+the	O
+son	O
+of	O
+a	O
+Brooklyn	O
+imam	O
+who	O
+was	O
+a	O
+possible	O
+co	O
+-	O
+conspirator	O
+in	O
+the	O
+bombing	O
+of	O
+the	O
+World	O
+Trade	O
+Center	O
+in	O
+1993	O
+--	O
+but	O
+was	O
+never	O
+charged	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+elder	O
+Wahhaj	O
+heads	O
+the	O
+Masjid	O
+At	O
+-	O
+Taqwa	O
+,	O
+a	O
+mosque	O
+that	O
+has	O
+attracted	O
+radical	O
+speakers	O
+over	O
+the	O
+years	O
+.	O
+
+Wahhaj	O
+met	O
+Mahmud	O
+Abouhalima	O
+when	O
+he	O
+came	O
+to	O
+the	O
+site	O
+to	O
+raise	O
+money	O
+for	O
+Muslims	O
+in	O
+Afghanistan	O
+.	O
+
+Imam	O
+Whose	O
+Son	O
+Was	O
+Training	O
+School	O
+Shooters	O
+Blasts	B-PROP
+Reporters	O
+On	O
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+Compound	O
+:	O
+“	O
+They	B-PROP
+Hate	I-PROP
+Islam	I-PROP
+”	I-PROP
+
+It	O
+’s	O
+noteworthy	O
+that	O
+AP	O
+would	O
+carry	O
+this	O
+story	O
+at	O
+all	O
+;	O
+certainly	O
+,	O
+neither	O
+AP	O
+nor	O
+the	O
+rest	O
+of	O
+the	O
+establishment	O
+media	O
+is	O
+ever	O
+so	O
+solicitous	O
+of	O
+those	B-PROP
+whom	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+smear	B-PROP
+as	I-PROP
+“	I-PROP
+anti	I-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+Muslim	I-PROP
+”	O
+to	O
+allow	O
+us	O
+to	O
+tell	O
+our	O
+side	O
+of	O
+the	O
+story	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+the	O
+imam	O
+Siraj	O
+Wahhaj	O
+is	O
+here	O
+engaging	O
+in	O
+some	O
+“	O
+war	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+deceit	I-PROP
+”	I-PROP
+action	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+His	O
+son	O
+was	O
+on	O
+the	O
+radar	O
+of	O
+counterterror	O
+officials	O
+for	O
+13	O
+years	O
+on	O
+suspicion	O
+of	O
+jihad	O
+activity	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+was	O
+training	O
+school	O
+shooters	O
+.	O
+
+But	B-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+course	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+all	I-PROP
+because	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+journalists	I-PROP
+who	I-PROP
+supposedly	I-PROP
+hate	I-PROP
+Islam	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+Muslims	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Ever	B-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+victim	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+
+Will	O
+Brett	O
+Kavanaugh	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Supreme	O
+Court	O
+?	O
+
+Will	O
+Brett	O
+Kavanaugh	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Supreme	O
+Court	O
+?	O
+
+Will	O
+Brett	O
+Kavanaugh	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Supreme	O
+Court	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+Yes	O
+,	O
+he	O
+will	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+.	O
+
+No	O
+,	O
+he	O
+will	O
+not	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+.	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Name	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Freedom	O
+Outpost	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+The	O
+Latest	O
+:	O
+Compound	O
+incident	O
+called	O
+anti	O
+-	O
+Muslim	O
+propaganda	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Associated	O
+Press	O
+,	O
+August	O
+10	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+(	O
+thanks	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Geller	O
+Report	O
+)	O
+:	O
+
+TAOS	O
+,	O
+N.M.	O
+(	O
+AP	O
+)	O
+—	O
+The	O
+Latest	O
+on	O
+11	O
+children	O
+found	O
+living	O
+in	O
+a	O
+filthy	B-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+makeshift	B-PROP
+compound	I-PROP
+in	O
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+(	O
+all	O
+times	O
+local	O
+)	O
+:	O
+4	O
+p.m.	O
+A	O
+representative	O
+of	O
+a	O
+New	O
+York	O
+mosque	O
+says	O
+the	O
+raid	O
+of	O
+a	O
+ramshackle	B-PROP
+compound	I-PROP
+in	O
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+is	O
+being	O
+used	O
+as	O
+propaganda	O
+against	O
+Muslims	O
+.	O
+
+Ali	O
+Abdul	O
+-	O
+Karim	O
+Judan	O
+,	O
+a	O
+spokesman	O
+for	O
+the	O
+mosque	O
+,	O
+said	O
+in	O
+a	O
+video	O
+posted	O
+Thursday	O
+on	O
+Facebook	O
+that	O
+the	O
+incident	O
+was	O
+a	O
+domestic	O
+situation	O
+that	O
+has	O
+nothing	O
+to	O
+do	O
+with	O
+extremism	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+grandfather	O
+of	O
+a	O
+severely	B-PROP
+disabled	I-PROP
+boy	O
+,	O
+who	O
+authorities	O
+say	O
+was	O
+kidnapped	B-PROP
+by	O
+his	O
+father	O
+and	O
+taken	O
+to	O
+the	O
+compound	O
+,	O
+has	O
+said	O
+remains	O
+found	O
+there	O
+are	O
+those	O
+of	O
+his	O
+grandson	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+man	O
+is	O
+an	O
+imam	O
+at	O
+the	O
+New	O
+York	O
+mosque	O
+.	O
+
+Judan	O
+also	O
+cast	O
+doubt	O
+on	O
+a	O
+contention	O
+by	O
+prosecutors	O
+that	O
+children	O
+found	O
+at	O
+the	O
+site	O
+were	O
+being	O
+trained	O
+to	O
+use	O
+assault	O
+rifles	O
+in	O
+preparation	O
+for	O
+school	O
+shootings	B-PROP
+.	O
+
+He	O
+said	O
+authorities	O
+should	O
+not	O
+have	O
+made	O
+that	O
+claim	O
+without	O
+stronger	O
+evidence	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+mosque	O
+has	O
+attracted	O
+radicals	B-PROP
+over	O
+the	O
+years	O
+,	O
+including	O
+a	O
+man	O
+who	O
+later	O
+helped	B-PROP
+bomb	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+World	I-PROP
+Trade	I-PROP
+Center	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+1993	I-PROP
+…	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Article	O
+posted	O
+with	O
+permission	O
+from	O
+Robert	O
+Spencer	O
+
+Unbelievable	B-PROP
+!	I-PROP
+
+Sharia	O
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+:	O
+Islamic	O
+compound	O
+jihadis	O
+RELEASED	O
+on	O
+bond	O
+after	O
+charges	O
+of	O
+“	O
+Islamophobia	O
+”	O
+and	O
+“	O
+racism	O
+”	O
+(	O
+Islam	O
+is	O
+not	O
+a	O
+race	O
+)	O
+
+Editor	O
+'s	O
+Note	O
+:	O
+Talk	B-PROP
+about	I-PROP
+injustice	I-PROP
+!	O
+
+There	O
+were	O
+remains	O
+of	O
+a	O
+4-year	O
+-	O
+old	O
+boy	O
+found	O
+there	O
+,	O
+who	O
+allegedly	O
+died	O
+while	O
+they	O
+were	O
+performing	O
+some	O
+sort	O
+of	O
+Islamic	O
+ritual	O
+over	O
+him	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Bundys	O
+and	O
+their	O
+supporters	O
+got	O
+nearly	O
+two	O
+years	O
+in	O
+jail	O
+and	O
+no	O
+one	O
+hurt	O
+a	O
+single	O
+person	O
+!	O
+
+Shame	B-PROP
+on	I-PROP
+those	I-PROP
+who	I-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+supposed	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+uphold	I-PROP
+law	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+justice	I-PROP
+!	O
+
+Shame	B-PROP
+!	O
+
+Taos	O
+County	O
+Sheriff	O
+Jerry	O
+Hogrefe	O
+testified	O
+that	O
+they	O
+found	O
+children	O
+holding	O
+boxes	O
+of	O
+ammunition	O
+,	O
+and	O
+that	O
+one	O
+child	O
+was	O
+found	O
+with	O
+a	O
+gun	O
+…	O
+.	O
+
+Because	B-PROP
+sharia	I-PROP
+trumps	I-PROP
+dead	I-PROP
+children	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+school	I-PROP
+shooting	I-PROP
+training	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+kidnapping	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+jihad	I-PROP
+training	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+The	O
+children	O
+discovered	O
+at	O
+an	O
+“	O
+extremist	B-PROP
+Muslim	I-PROP
+”	O
+compound	O
+in	O
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+earlier	O
+this	O
+month	O
+were	O
+both	O
+trained	O
+to	O
+use	O
+firearms	O
+and	O
+taught	O
+multiple	O
+tactical	O
+techniques	O
+in	O
+order	O
+to	O
+kill	B-PROP
+teachers	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+law	I-PROP
+enforcement	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+other	I-PROP
+institution	I-PROP
+…	O
+.	O
+
+state	O
+prosecutors	O
+said	O
+on	O
+Monday	O
+.	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+
+Will	O
+Brett	O
+Kavanaugh	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Supreme	O
+Court	O
+?	O
+
+Will	O
+Brett	O
+Kavanaugh	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Supreme	O
+Court	O
+?	O
+
+Will	O
+Brett	O
+Kavanaugh	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Supreme	O
+Court	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+Yes	O
+,	O
+he	O
+will	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+.	O
+
+No	O
+,	O
+he	O
+will	O
+not	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+.	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Comments	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Freedom	O
+Outpost	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Islamophobia	O
+”	O
+is	O
+a	B-PROP
+thought	I-PROP
+crushing	I-PROP
+device	I-PROP
+designed	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+silence	I-PROP
+any	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+critics	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+criticism	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+Islam	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+It	O
+is	O
+the	O
+tool	O
+in	O
+which	O
+the	O
+ummah	O
+enforces	O
+sharia	O
+blasphemy	O
+laws	O
+in	O
+the	O
+West	O
+.	O
+
+Waco	O
+–	O
+the	B-PROP
+Feds	I-PROP
+killed	O
+’em	O
+all	O
+.	O
+
+Shot	O
+it	O
+up	O
+and	O
+burned	O
+it	O
+down	O
+.	O
+
+Fast	O
+forward	O
+to	O
+Islam	O
+in	O
+America	O
+—	O
+
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+compound	O
+jihadis	O
+released	O
+on	O
+bond	O
+after	O
+charges	O
+of	O
+racism	O
+and	O
+“	O
+Islamophobia	O
+”	O
+“	O
+THEIR	O
+LAWYER	O
+ARGUED	O
+THAT	O
+THERE	O
+WAS	O
+A	O
+DOUBLE	O
+STANDARD	O
+IN	O
+THE	O
+CASE	O
+BECAUSE	O
+HIS	O
+CLIENTS	O
+WERE	O
+MUSLIMS	O
+.	O
+
+HE	B-PROP
+ARGUED	I-PROP
+THAT	I-PROP
+IF	I-PROP
+THEY	I-PROP
+HAD	I-PROP
+BEEN	I-PROP
+CHRISTIAN	I-PROP
+AND	I-PROP
+WHITE	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+‘	I-PROP
+WE	I-PROP
+MIGHT	I-PROP
+NOT	I-PROP
+BE	I-PROP
+HERE	I-PROP
+TODAY	I-PROP
+.	O
+’	O
+”	O
+Bu	O
+Jihad	O
+Watch	O
+,	O
+August	O
+13	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+:	O
+Seriously	B-PROP
+?	I-PROP
+
+If	O
+they	O
+had	O
+been	O
+Christian	O
+and	O
+white	O
+,	O
+stockpiling	O
+weapons	O
+and	O
+plotting	O
+school	O
+shootings	O
+,	O
+with	O
+the	O
+ringleader	O
+being	O
+the	O
+son	O
+of	O
+one	O
+of	O
+the	O
+most	O
+respected	O
+Christian	O
+preachers	O
+in	O
+the	O
+country	O
+,	O
+there	O
+would	O
+n’t	O
+have	O
+been	O
+news	O
+coverage	O
+of	O
+anything	O
+else	O
+for	O
+weeks	O
+.	O
+
+There	O
+would	O
+have	O
+been	O
+feature	O
+stories	O
+in	O
+the	O
+New	O
+York	O
+Times	O
+,	O
+the	O
+Washington	O
+Post	O
+,	O
+and	O
+the	O
+Wall	O
+Street	O
+Journal	O
+.	O
+
+CNN	O
+and	O
+MSNBC	O
+would	O
+be	O
+running	O
+special	O
+reports	O
+on	O
+toxic	B-PROP
+Christianity	I-PROP
+and	O
+the	O
+crisis	O
+in	O
+the	O
+churches	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+incident	O
+,	O
+on	O
+the	O
+other	O
+hand	O
+,	O
+received	O
+very	O
+little	O
+coverage	O
+,	O
+and	O
+hardly	O
+any	O
+that	O
+touched	O
+on	O
+the	O
+Islamic	O
+aspects	O
+of	O
+the	O
+story	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+Muslim	O
+claims	O
+of	O
+victimhood	O
+are	O
+so	O
+polished	O
+and	O
+reflexive	O
+by	O
+now	O
+,	O
+and	O
+the	O
+Leftist	O
+acceptance	O
+of	O
+them	O
+so	O
+matter	O
+-	O
+of	O
+-	O
+fact	O
+and	O
+instinctive	O
+,	O
+that	O
+Judge	O
+Sarah	O
+Backus	O
+fell	O
+right	O
+into	O
+line	O
+.	O
+
+We	B-PROP
+can	I-PROP
+only	I-PROP
+hope	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+no	I-PROP
+one	I-PROP
+dies	I-PROP
+because	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+her	I-PROP
+folly	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Breaking	O
+:	O
+Judge	O
+makes	O
+stunning	B-PROP
+decision	I-PROP
+in	O
+Muslim	O
+compound	O
+case	O
+after	O
+charges	O
+of	O
+racism	O
+,	O
+”	O
+by	O
+Carlos	O
+Garcia	O
+,	O
+The	O
+Blaze	O
+,	O
+August	O
+13	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+(	O
+thanks	O
+to	O
+Robert	O
+)	O
+:	O
+In	O
+a	O
+hearing	O
+Monday	O
+,	O
+a	O
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+judge	O
+found	O
+that	O
+suspects	O
+in	O
+a	O
+bizarre	O
+child	O
+abuse	O
+case	O
+were	O
+not	O
+a	O
+danger	O
+to	O
+the	O
+public	O
+,	O
+and	O
+released	O
+them	O
+on	O
+bond	O
+.	O
+
+Defense	O
+attorney	O
+blames	O
+Islamophobia	O
+Two	O
+Muslim	O
+men	O
+and	O
+three	O
+women	O
+are	O
+charged	O
+with	O
+11	O
+counts	O
+of	O
+child	O
+abuse	O
+each	O
+after	O
+police	O
+raided	O
+their	O
+compound	O
+in	O
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+and	O
+discovered	O
+11	O
+malnourished	O
+children	O
+living	O
+in	O
+squalor	O
+.	O
+
+Their	O
+lawyer	O
+argued	O
+that	O
+there	O
+was	O
+a	O
+double	O
+standard	O
+in	O
+the	O
+case	O
+because	O
+his	O
+clients	O
+were	O
+Muslims	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+argued	O
+that	O
+if	B-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+had	I-PROP
+been	I-PROP
+Christian	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+white	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+“	I-PROP
+we	I-PROP
+might	I-PROP
+not	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+here	I-PROP
+today	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+”	I-PROP
+Despite	O
+law	O
+enforcement	O
+authorities	O
+saying	O
+that	O
+they	O
+believe	O
+that	O
+the	O
+children	O
+were	O
+being	O
+trained	O
+to	O
+attack	O
+innocents	B-PROP
+,	O
+and	O
+that	O
+the	O
+adults	O
+were	O
+radicalized	O
+,	O
+Judge	O
+Sarah	O
+Backus	O
+released	O
+the	O
+suspects	O
+.	O
+
+Prosecutors	O
+also	O
+said	O
+they	O
+obtained	O
+a	O
+letter	O
+from	O
+one	O
+of	O
+the	O
+suspects	O
+telling	O
+his	O
+brother	O
+to	O
+come	O
+to	O
+the	O
+compound	O
+and	O
+die	B-PROP
+like	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+martyr	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+The	O
+lawyer	O
+for	O
+the	O
+suspects	O
+said	O
+that	O
+there	O
+was	O
+no	O
+evidence	O
+that	O
+they	O
+were	O
+planning	O
+any	O
+kind	O
+of	O
+attacks	O
+.	O
+
+Taos	O
+County	O
+Sheriff	O
+Jerry	O
+Hogrefe	O
+testified	O
+that	O
+they	O
+found	O
+children	O
+holding	O
+boxes	O
+of	O
+ammunition	O
+,	O
+and	O
+that	O
+one	O
+child	O
+was	O
+found	O
+with	O
+a	O
+gun	O
+…	O
+
+Article	O
+posted	O
+with	O
+permission	O
+from	O
+Pamela	O
+Geller	O
+
+The	O
+Brennan	O
+-	O
+Rosenstein	O
+-	O
+Mueller	O
+–	O
+Comey	O
+-	O
+Presstitute	O
+
+Russiagate	O
+is	O
+an	O
+orchestration	O
+.	O
+
+It	O
+is	O
+the	O
+response	O
+of	O
+the	O
+military	O
+/	O
+security	O
+complex	O
+to	O
+Donald	O
+Trump	O
+’s	O
+presidential	O
+campaign	O
+statement	O
+that	O
+he	O
+intended	O
+to	O
+normalize	O
+relations	O
+with	O
+Russia	O
+.	O
+
+Trump	O
+recognized	O
+that	O
+the	O
+extreme	B-PROP
+Russiaphobia	I-PROP
+,	O
+which	O
+the	B-PROP
+hegemonic	B-PROP
+neoconservatives	I-PROP
+had	B-PROP
+whipped	B-PROP
+up	I-PROP
+since	O
+Vladimir	O
+Putin	O
+’s	O
+statement	O
+at	O
+the	O
+Munich	O
+Security	O
+Conference	O
+in	O
+2007	O
+that	O
+Russia	O
+was	O
+a	B-PROP
+sovereign	I-PROP
+country	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+intended	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+act	I-PROP
+like	I-PROP
+one	I-PROP
+,	O
+was	O
+a	B-PROP
+threat	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+life	I-PROP
+on	I-PROP
+earth	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+The	O
+neoconservatives	O
+,	O
+who	O
+have	O
+controlled	O
+US	O
+foreign	O
+policy	O
+since	O
+the	O
+Clinton	O
+regime	O
+,	O
+are	O
+unwilling	O
+to	O
+accept	O
+limitations	O
+by	O
+any	O
+other	O
+country	O
+on	O
+Washington	O
+’s	O
+ability	O
+to	O
+act	O
+unilaterally	O
+.	O
+
+When	O
+Putin	O
+blocked	O
+the	O
+Obama	O
+regime	O
+’s	O
+invasion	O
+of	O
+Syria	O
+and	O
+bombing	O
+of	O
+Iran	O
+,	O
+the	O
+neoconservatives	O
+paid	O
+Putin	O
+back	O
+by	O
+using	O
+NGOs	O
+and	O
+Ukranian	O
+politicians	O
+financed	O
+by	O
+Washington	O
+to	O
+overthrow	O
+the	O
+democratically	O
+elected	O
+government	O
+of	O
+Ukraine	O
+and	O
+to	O
+put	O
+in	O
+office	O
+a	O
+government	O
+hostile	O
+to	O
+Russia	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+intent	O
+was	O
+to	O
+use	O
+Ukraine	O
+,	O
+a	O
+Russian	O
+province	O
+for	O
+more	O
+than	O
+three	O
+centuries	O
+,	O
+to	O
+create	O
+problems	O
+for	O
+Russia	O
+that	O
+would	O
+absorb	O
+Russia	O
+’s	O
+attention	O
+and	O
+return	O
+a	O
+free	O
+hand	O
+to	O
+Washington	O
+and	O
+Israel	O
+in	O
+the	O
+Middle	O
+East	O
+and	O
+also	O
+to	O
+evict	O
+Russia	O
+from	O
+its	O
+Black	O
+Sea	O
+naval	O
+base	O
+in	O
+Crimea	O
+.	O
+
+When	O
+Crimeans	O
+voted	O
+to	O
+reunite	O
+with	O
+Russia	O
+,	O
+Washington	B-PROP
+misrepresented	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+democratic	I-PROP
+result	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+self	I-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+determination	I-PROP
+as	O
+a	O
+“	O
+Russian	B-PROP
+invasion	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+annexation	I-PROP
+of	O
+Crimea	O
+.	O
+”	O
+Such	B-PROP
+an	I-PROP
+extraordinary	I-PROP
+misrepresentation	I-PROP
+destroyed	O
+any	O
+remaining	O
+confidence	O
+the	O
+Russian	O
+government	O
+might	O
+have	O
+had	O
+in	O
+Washington	O
+’s	O
+veracity	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Neoconservative	O
+Th	O
+...	O
+Dr.	O
+Paul	O
+Craig	O
+Roberts	O
+Best	O
+Price	O
+:	O
+$	O
+11.96	O
+Buy	O
+New	O
+$	O
+19.34	O
+(	O
+as	O
+of	O
+10:15	O
+EDT	O
+-	O
+Details	O
+)	O
+From	O
+here	O
+relations	O
+between	O
+the	O
+two	O
+nuclear	O
+powers	O
+deteriorated	O
+rapidly	O
+.	O
+
+As	O
+I	O
+and	O
+Stephen	O
+Cohen	O
+have	O
+emphasized	O
+,	O
+the	O
+danger	O
+of	O
+nuclear	O
+war	O
+is	O
+today	O
+far	O
+higher	O
+than	O
+ever	O
+during	O
+the	O
+long	O
+Cold	O
+War	O
+as	O
+there	O
+is	O
+today	O
+no	O
+trust	O
+whatsoever	O
+between	O
+the	O
+two	O
+governments	O
+.	O
+
+Donald	B-PROP
+Trump	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+totally	B-PROP
+correct	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+nuclear	B-PROP
+war	I-PROP
+would	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+terminable	I-PROP
+event	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+nothing	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+more	I-PROP
+important	I-PROP
+than	I-PROP
+restoring	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+cooperative	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+mutually	I-PROP
+respectful	I-PROP
+relationship	I-PROP
+between	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+US	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+Russia	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+The	O
+problem	O
+is	O
+that	O
+the	O
+military	O
+/	O
+security	O
+complex	O
+sees	O
+it	O
+differently	O
+.	O
+
+After	O
+70	O
+years	O
+of	O
+entrenchment	O
+the	O
+military	O
+/	O
+security	O
+complex	O
+is	O
+an	O
+independent	O
+political	O
+force	O
+.	O
+
+President	O
+Eisenhower	O
+warned	O
+the	O
+American	O
+people	O
+about	O
+this	O
+likely	O
+outcome	O
+in	O
+1961	O
+to	O
+no	O
+avail	O
+.	O
+
+From	O
+the	O
+standpoint	O
+of	O
+the	O
+military	O
+/	O
+security	O
+complex	O
+,	O
+the	O
+problem	O
+of	O
+normalizing	O
+relations	O
+with	O
+Russia	O
+is	O
+that	O
+it	O
+downgrades	O
+the	O
+“	O
+Russian	O
+threat	O
+”	O
+that	O
+is	O
+so	O
+essential	O
+to	O
+the	O
+$	O
+1,000	O
+billion	O
+annual	O
+budget	O
+of	O
+the	O
+military	O
+/	O
+security	O
+complex	O
+and	O
+the	O
+power	O
+that	O
+such	O
+a	O
+massive	O
+budget	O
+conveys	O
+.	O
+
+Only	O
+16	O
+countries	O
+in	O
+the	O
+world	O
+out	O
+of	O
+195	O
+countries	O
+have	O
+a	O
+GDP	O
+greater	O
+than	O
+$	O
+1,000	O
+billion	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+military	O
+/	O
+security	O
+complex	O
+is	O
+large	O
+enough	O
+to	O
+be	O
+a	O
+member	O
+of	O
+the	O
+G-20	O
+and	O
+to	O
+have	O
+its	O
+own	O
+currency	O
+and	O
+military	O
+.	O
+
+Obama	O
+’s	O
+CIA	O
+director	O
+,	O
+John	O
+Brennan	O
+,	O
+quickly	O
+organized	O
+the	O
+Russiagate	O
+conspiracy	O
+against	O
+Trump	O
+.	O
+
+Comey	O
+,	O
+Rosenstein	O
+,	O
+Clapper	O
+,	O
+Mueller	O
+,	O
+McCabe	O
+,	O
+Peter	O
+Strzok	O
+and	O
+others	O
+were	O
+,	O
+and	O
+are	O
+,	O
+apparently	O
+implicated	O
+as	O
+active	O
+participants	O
+in	O
+orchestrating	O
+an	O
+alleged	O
+collusion	O
+between	O
+Donald	O
+Trump	O
+and	O
+Vladimir	O
+Putin	O
+to	O
+steal	O
+the	O
+US	O
+presidential	O
+election	O
+.	O
+
+Based	O
+on	O
+deception	O
+of	O
+the	O
+FISA	O
+Court	O
+,	O
+warrants	O
+were	O
+illegally	O
+obtained	O
+that	O
+became	O
+the	O
+basis	O
+for	O
+appointing	O
+Mueller	O
+as	O
+a	O
+special	O
+prosecutor	O
+to	O
+construct	O
+by	O
+whatever	O
+means	O
+possible	O
+a	O
+case	O
+against	O
+President	O
+Trump	O
+.	O
+
+After	O
+two	O
+years	O
+the	O
+only	O
+evidence	O
+we	O
+have	O
+of	O
+Russiagate	O
+is	O
+that	O
+it	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+conspiracy	I-PROP
+against	I-PROP
+President	I-PROP
+Trump	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Indeed	B-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+Mueller	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+fully	I-PROP
+aware	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+there	I-PROP
+was	I-PROP
+no	I-PROP
+Trump	I-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+Putin	I-PROP
+conspiracy	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+has	I-PROP
+not	I-PROP
+bothered	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+look	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+any	I-PROP
+evidence	I-PROP
+as	I-PROP
+there	I-PROP
+can	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+no	I-PROP
+evidence	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+something	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+did	I-PROP
+not	I-PROP
+happen	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+He	B-PROP
+pulled	I-PROP
+out	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+hat	I-PROP
+some	I-PROP
+phony	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+meaningless	I-PROP
+indictments	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+some	I-PROP
+Russians	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+order	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+make	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+look	I-PROP
+like	I-PROP
+there	I-PROP
+was	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+conspiracy	I-PROP
+without	I-PROP
+having	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+prove	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+but	O
+his	O
+main	O
+focus	O
+has	O
+been	O
+on	O
+framing	O
+Paul	O
+Manafort	O
+.	O
+
+Mueller	O
+’s	O
+investigation	O
+of	O
+Manafort	O
+has	O
+nothing	O
+to	O
+do	O
+with	O
+the	O
+Russiagate	O
+story	O
+line	O
+.	O
+
+Manafort	O
+’s	O
+alleged	O
+crimes	O
+are	O
+far	O
+outside	O
+Mueller	O
+’s	O
+mandate	O
+and	O
+took	O
+place	O
+,	O
+if	O
+they	O
+did	O
+,	O
+years	O
+before	O
+the	O
+alleged	O
+events	O
+of	O
+Russiagate	O
+.	O
+
+Manafort	O
+’s	O
+conviction	O
+by	O
+a	O
+jury	O
+on	O
+8	O
+of	O
+the	O
+18	O
+counts	O
+is	O
+being	O
+misrepresented	O
+by	O
+the	B-PROP
+Trump	I-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+hating	I-PROP
+presstitutes	I-PROP
+as	O
+vindication	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Russiagate	O
+investigation	O
+and	O
+as	O
+“	O
+A	O
+dark	B-PROP
+day	O
+for	O
+Trump	O
+,	O
+”	O
+with	O
+the	O
+presstitutes	O
+suggesting	O
+a	O
+Watergate	O
+parallel	O
+that	O
+will	O
+force	O
+Trump	O
+from	O
+office	O
+.	O
+
+Manafort	O
+was	O
+found	O
+guilty	O
+not	O
+of	O
+Russiagate	O
+,	O
+but	O
+of	O
+income	O
+tax	O
+evasion	O
+and	O
+misrepresenting	O
+his	O
+financial	O
+position	O
+on	O
+a	O
+loan	O
+application	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+do	O
+not	O
+know	O
+if	O
+Manafort	O
+is	O
+guilty	O
+or	O
+is	O
+simply	O
+a	B-PROP
+victim	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+Mueller	I-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+frameup	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+an	I-PROP
+incompetent	I-PROP
+jury	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+American	B-PROP
+juries	I-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+notoriously	I-PROP
+incompetent	I-PROP
+,	O
+which	O
+is	O
+why	O
+97	O
+%	O
+of	O
+felony	O
+indictments	O
+are	O
+settled	O
+with	O
+a	O
+plea	O
+bargain	O
+.	O
+
+Even	O
+the	O
+innocent	O
+had	O
+rather	O
+work	O
+out	O
+a	O
+plea	O
+arrangement	O
+and	O
+admit	O
+to	O
+something	O
+that	O
+they	O
+did	O
+not	O
+do	O
+than	O
+to	O
+face	O
+an	O
+insouciant	B-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+jury	O
+.	O
+
+Remember	O
+the	O
+jury	O
+that	O
+condemned	O
+the	O
+survivors	O
+of	O
+the	O
+FBI	O
+’s	O
+massacre	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Branch	O
+Davidians	O
+in	O
+Waco	O
+,	O
+Texas	O
+,	O
+to	O
+be	O
+locked	O
+away	O
+for	O
+many	O
+years	O
+so	O
+that	O
+they	O
+could	O
+not	O
+talk	O
+and	O
+tell	O
+of	O
+the	O
+mass	O
+murder	O
+inflicted	O
+on	O
+a	O
+religious	O
+group	O
+by	O
+the	O
+FBI	O
+.	O
+
+It	O
+is	O
+unclear	O
+how	O
+much	O
+of	O
+a	O
+crime	O
+it	O
+can	O
+be	O
+to	O
+misrepresent	O
+your	O
+financial	O
+position	O
+on	O
+a	O
+loan	O
+application	O
+when	O
+one	B-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+causes	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+mortgage	I-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+backed	I-PROP
+derivative	I-PROP
+crisis	I-PROP
+was	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+misrepresentation	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+mortgage	I-PROP
+applicants	I-PROP
+on	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+loan	I-PROP
+documents	I-PROP
+by	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+companies	I-PROP
+issuing	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+mortgages	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Instead	O
+of	O
+prosecution	O
+,	O
+Washington	O
+relied	O
+on	O
+the	O
+Federal	O
+Reserve	O
+to	O
+bail	O
+out	O
+the	O
+banks	O
+holding	O
+the	O
+misrepresented	O
+loans	O
+.	O
+
+Income	O
+tax	O
+invasion	O
+is	O
+the	O
+purview	O
+of	O
+the	O
+IRS	O
+,	O
+not	O
+of	O
+a	O
+special	O
+prosecutor	O
+who	O
+is	O
+supposed	O
+to	O
+be	O
+looking	O
+for	O
+evidence	O
+of	O
+a	O
+Trump	B-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+Putin	I-PROP
+conspiracy	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Russia	O
+Hoax	O
+:	O
+The	O
+I	O
+...	O
+Gregg	O
+Jarrett	O
+Best	O
+Price	O
+:	O
+$	O
+13.99	O
+Buy	O
+New	O
+$	O
+12.63	O
+(	O
+as	O
+of	O
+08:40	O
+EDT	O
+-	O
+Details	O
+)	O
+
+So	O
+,	O
+why	O
+did	O
+Mueller	O
+focus	O
+on	O
+Manafort	O
+?	O
+
+Let	O
+Harvard	O
+Law	O
+Professor	O
+Alan	O
+Dershowitz	O
+tell	O
+you	O
+:	O
+
+“	O
+All	O
+the	O
+Special	O
+Counsel	O
+needs	O
+,	O
+in	O
+order	O
+to	O
+charge	O
+a	O
+subject	O
+of	O
+an	O
+investigation	O
+with	O
+lying	O
+to	O
+a	O
+prosecutor	O
+,	O
+is	O
+a	O
+single	O
+witnesses	O
+willing	O
+to	O
+contradict	O
+the	O
+subject	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+The	O
+witness	O
+may	O
+not	O
+only	O
+be	O
+“	O
+singing	O
+,	O
+”	O
+he	O
+may	O
+also	O
+be	O
+“	O
+composing	O
+”	O
+—	O
+that	O
+is	O
+,	O
+making	B-PROP
+up	I-PROP
+or	I-PROP
+embellishing	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+story	I-PROP
+because	B-PROP
+he	I-PROP
+knows	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+better	I-PROP
+his	I-PROP
+story	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+better	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+deal	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Under	O
+federal	O
+law	O
+,	O
+the	O
+testimony	O
+of	O
+such	O
+a	O
+“	O
+flipped	B-PROP
+witness	I-PROP
+”	O
+need	O
+not	O
+be	O
+corroborated	O
+in	O
+order	O
+to	O
+secure	O
+a	O
+conviction	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Even	O
+one	O
+question	O
+that	O
+results	O
+in	O
+an	O
+answer	O
+that	O
+is	O
+contradicted	O
+by	O
+one	O
+witness	O
+would	O
+be	O
+enough	O
+to	O
+spring	O
+the	O
+perjury	O
+trap	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+President	O
+Trump	O
+has	O
+made	O
+various	O
+statements	O
+disputing	O
+the	O
+orchestrated	O
+Russiagate	O
+accusations	O
+that	O
+,	O
+if	O
+Manafort	O
+as	O
+witness	O
+for	O
+the	O
+Special	O
+Prosecutor	O
+contradicted	O
+,	O
+could	O
+send	O
+the	O
+President	O
+of	O
+the	O
+United	O
+States	O
+to	O
+prison	O
+for	O
+perjury	O
+.	O
+
+Knowing	O
+this	O
+,	O
+Mueller	O
+,	O
+in	B-PROP
+my	I-PROP
+opinion	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+proven	I-PROP
+corrupt	I-PROP
+person	I-PROP
+,	O
+decided	O
+to	O
+put	B-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+squeeze	I-PROP
+on	O
+Manafort	O
+in	O
+order	O
+to	O
+force	O
+Manafort	O
+to	O
+save	O
+himself	O
+by	O
+giving	O
+false	O
+testimony	O
+against	O
+Trump	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+tactic	O
+is	O
+used	O
+every	O
+day	O
+by	O
+state	O
+,	O
+local	O
+,	O
+and	O
+federal	O
+prosecutors	O
+.	O
+
+Americans	B-PROP
+who	O
+believe	O
+the	O
+indictments	O
+and	O
+convictions	O
+are	O
+unaware	O
+that	O
+97	O
+%	O
+of	O
+the	O
+time	O
+the	O
+convictions	O
+rest	O
+on	O
+self	O
+-	O
+incrimination	O
+in	O
+order	O
+to	O
+avoid	O
+worse	O
+punishment	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+Manafort	O
+’s	O
+case	O
+it	O
+did	O
+n’t	O
+,	O
+or	O
+has	O
+n’t	O
+,	O
+worked	O
+.	O
+
+Yet	O
+.	O
+
+Manafort	O
+is	O
+due	O
+for	O
+a	O
+second	O
+trial	O
+,	O
+this	O
+time	O
+for	O
+allegely	O
+acting	O
+as	O
+an	O
+unregistered	O
+foreign	O
+agent	O
+for	O
+Ukrainian	O
+interests	O
+and	O
+for	O
+making	O
+false	O
+statements	O
+not	O
+under	O
+oath	O
+to	O
+the	O
+US	O
+government	O
+.	O
+
+Reportedly	O
+,	O
+Manafort	O
+is	O
+being	O
+held	O
+in	O
+solitary	O
+confinement	O
+,	O
+a	O
+form	O
+of	O
+torture	O
+designed	O
+to	O
+break	B-PROP
+a	O
+person	O
+’s	O
+spirit	O
+.	O
+
+Like	O
+Manafort	O
+’s	O
+first	O
+trial	O
+,	O
+his	O
+second	O
+trial	O
+has	O
+nothing	O
+whatsoever	O
+to	O
+do	O
+with	O
+Russiagate	O
+,	O
+but	B-PROP
+you	I-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+never	I-PROP
+learn	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+from	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+presstitute	I-PROP
+media	I-PROP
+or	I-PROP
+from	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+Democratic	I-PROP
+Party	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Manafort	O
+can	O
+still	O
+be	O
+coerced	O
+to	O
+say	O
+something	O
+that	O
+can	O
+be	O
+used	O
+to	O
+drive	O
+Trump	O
+from	O
+office	O
+.	O
+
+What	O
+about	O
+Michael	O
+Cohen	O
+,	O
+a	O
+former	O
+attorney	O
+for	O
+Trump	O
+?	O
+
+Mueller	O
+saw	O
+no	O
+value	O
+in	O
+the	O
+Cohen	O
+case	O
+and	O
+passed	O
+it	O
+off	O
+to	O
+a	O
+regular	O
+US	O
+attorney	O
+to	O
+prosecute	O
+.	O
+
+Therefore	O
+,	O
+it	O
+would	O
+appear	O
+not	O
+to	O
+be	O
+part	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Russiagate	O
+investigation	O
+.	O
+
+Cohen	O
+avoided	O
+a	O
+jury	O
+and	O
+said	O
+he	O
+was	O
+guilty	O
+of	O
+five	O
+counts	O
+of	O
+personal	O
+income	O
+tax	O
+evasion	O
+,	O
+one	O
+count	O
+of	O
+making	O
+a	O
+false	O
+statement	O
+to	O
+a	O
+financial	O
+institution	O
+in	O
+order	O
+to	O
+get	O
+a	O
+loan	O
+,	O
+and	O
+two	O
+counts	O
+related	O
+to	O
+illegal	O
+campaign	O
+contributions	O
+.	O
+
+With	O
+regard	O
+to	O
+the	O
+campagin	O
+contributions	O
+,	O
+he	O
+contradicted	O
+his	O
+previous	O
+statements	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+said	O
+that	O
+on	O
+Trump	O
+’s	O
+instruction	O
+,	O
+he	O
+paid	O
+off	O
+two	O
+women	O
+who	O
+were	O
+claiming	O
+sexual	O
+affairs	O
+with	O
+Trump	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+intricacies	O
+of	O
+American	O
+laws	O
+relating	O
+to	O
+politics	O
+are	O
+often	O
+unclear	O
+.	O
+
+Apparently	O
+,	O
+the	O
+charge	O
+is	O
+that	O
+Cohen	O
+used	O
+monies	O
+raised	O
+for	O
+a	O
+political	O
+campaign	O
+to	O
+pay	O
+off	O
+two	O
+women	O
+,	O
+who	O
+saw	O
+and	O
+capitalized	O
+on	O
+an	O
+opportunity	O
+to	O
+extort	O
+Trump	O
+for	O
+money	O
+,	O
+and	O
+this	O
+was	O
+an	O
+illegal	O
+use	O
+of	O
+the	O
+money	O
+.	O
+
+Why	O
+a	O
+lawyer	O
+would	O
+pay	O
+off	O
+women	O
+,	O
+whose	O
+stories	O
+might	O
+or	O
+might	O
+not	O
+be	O
+true	O
+,	O
+in	O
+an	O
+illegal	O
+way	O
+when	O
+his	B-PROP
+client	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+multi	I-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+billionaire	I-PROP
+does	I-PROP
+n’t	I-PROP
+make	I-PROP
+much	I-PROP
+sense	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+these	O
+are	O
+not	O
+the	O
+kind	O
+of	O
+questions	O
+that	O
+the	O
+presstitutes	O
+are	O
+interested	O
+in	O
+.	O
+
+Nevertheless	O
+,	O
+Cohen	O
+’s	O
+plea	O
+is	O
+associated	O
+with	O
+a	O
+case	O
+brought	O
+by	O
+another	O
+prosecutor	O
+,	O
+not	O
+by	O
+Special	O
+Prosecutor	O
+Mueller	O
+.	O
+
+I	O
+am	O
+not	O
+sufficiently	O
+familiar	O
+with	O
+US	O
+legal	O
+procedures	O
+to	O
+be	O
+able	O
+to	O
+say	O
+how	O
+this	O
+gets	O
+brought	O
+back	O
+into	O
+Mueller	O
+’s	O
+investigation	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+facts	O
+are	O
+this	O
+:	O
+
+The	O
+US	O
+military	O
+/	O
+security	O
+complex	O
+will	O
+not	O
+permit	O
+any	O
+normalization	O
+of	O
+relations	O
+with	O
+Russia	O
+.	O
+
+Period	O
+.	O
+
+At	B-PROP
+some	I-PROP
+point	I-PROP
+Putin	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+Lavrov	I-PROP
+and	O
+the	B-PROP
+idiot	I-PROP
+Russian	I-PROP
+Atlanticist	I-PROP
+Integrationists	I-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+have	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+acknowledge	I-PROP
+this	I-PROP
+fact	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+or	I-PROP
+Russia	I-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+destroyed	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Trump	O
+,	O
+by	O
+declaring	O
+normalization	O
+of	O
+relations	O
+as	O
+one	O
+of	O
+his	O
+two	O
+principal	O
+goals	O
+for	O
+his	O
+presidency	O
+,	O
+earned	O
+the	O
+emnity	O
+of	O
+the	O
+powerful	O
+military	O
+/	O
+security	O
+complex	O
+.	O
+
+By	O
+defeating	O
+Hillary	O
+for	O
+the	O
+presidency	O
+,	O
+Trump	O
+inflamed	B-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+US	I-PROP
+media	I-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+hatred	I-PROP
+,	O
+committed	O
+as	O
+the	O
+presstitutes	O
+are	O
+to	O
+Identity	O
+Politics	O
+and	O
+hatred	O
+of	O
+the	O
+“	O
+white	B-PROP
+male	I-PROP
+oppressors	I-PROP
+”	I-PROP
+who	O
+elected	O
+Trump	O
+.	O
+
+Trump	O
+will	O
+never	O
+be	O
+forgiven	O
+for	O
+preventing	O
+the	O
+election	O
+of	O
+the	O
+first	O
+female	O
+president	O
+of	O
+the	O
+United	O
+States	O
+,	O
+an	B-PROP
+unpardonable	O
+crime	O
+by	O
+a	B-PROP
+misogynist	I-PROP
+white	I-PROP
+male	I-PROP
+who	I-PROP
+“	I-PROP
+grabs	I-PROP
+women	I-PROP
+by	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+pussy	I-PROP
+.	O
+”	O
+
+The	O
+hatred	O
+of	O
+Trump	O
+by	O
+the	O
+military	O
+/	O
+security	O
+complex	O
+and	O
+by	O
+the	O
+white	B-PROP
+male	I-PROP
+hating	I-PROP
+Identity	I-PROP
+Politics	I-PROP
+of	O
+the	O
+Democratic	O
+Party	O
+is	B-PROP
+giving	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+world	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+spectacle	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+an	I-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+democratic	I-PROP
+presidential	I-PROP
+election	I-PROP
+being	I-PROP
+overthrown	I-PROP
+by	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+conspiracy	I-PROP
+between	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+military	I-PROP
+/	I-PROP
+security	I-PROP
+complex	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+Democratic	I-PROP
+Party	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+whores	I-PROP
+who	I-PROP
+constitute	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+print	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+TV	I-PROP
+media	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Death	O
+of	O
+a	O
+Nation	O
+:	O
+Pla	O
+...	O
+Dinesh	O
+D'Souza	O
+Best	O
+Price	O
+:	O
+$	O
+14.99	O
+Buy	O
+New	O
+$	O
+16.99	O
+(	O
+as	O
+of	O
+03:35	O
+EDT	O
+-	O
+Details	O
+)	O
+
+President	O
+Trump	O
+stands	O
+up	O
+for	O
+himself	O
+on	O
+Twitter	O
+—	O
+I	O
+am	O
+surprised	O
+that	O
+Tritter	O
+has	O
+n’t	O
+suspended	O
+his	O
+account	O
+—	O
+but	O
+otherwise	O
+seems	O
+powerless	O
+.	O
+
+Whoever	O
+advised	O
+Trump	O
+to	O
+appoint	O
+Rosenstein	O
+,	O
+a	B-PROP
+person	I-PROP
+committed	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+Trump	I-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+destruction	I-PROP
+,	O
+as	O
+deputy	O
+attorney	O
+general	O
+,	O
+which	O
+is	O
+the	O
+ruling	O
+position	O
+in	O
+view	O
+of	O
+the	B-PROP
+weak	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+stupid	I-PROP
+AG	I-PROP
+Sessions	I-PROP
+who	O
+recused	O
+himself	O
+from	O
+the	O
+Russiagate	O
+investigation	O
+,	O
+intended	B-PROP
+Trump	I-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+destruction	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+A	B-PROP
+disreputable	I-PROP
+person	I-PROP
+committed	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+Trump	I-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+destruction	I-PROP
+is	O
+appointed	O
+by	O
+Trump	O
+to	O
+destroy	B-PROP
+Trump	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+How	O
+can	O
+a	O
+person	O
+so	O
+unclued	O
+survive	O
+?	O
+
+As	O
+I	O
+wrote	O
+during	O
+the	O
+presidential	O
+campaign	O
+,	O
+Trump	O
+has	O
+no	O
+idea	O
+of	O
+Washington	O
+and	O
+no	O
+idea	O
+who	O
+to	O
+appoint	O
+who	O
+would	O
+support	O
+him	O
+rather	O
+than	O
+work	O
+against	O
+him	O
+.	O
+
+Consequently	O
+,	O
+he	O
+has	O
+a	O
+government	O
+working	O
+against	O
+him	O
+.	O
+
+Senators	O
+John	O
+McCain	O
+and	O
+Lindsey	O
+Graham	O
+are	O
+working	O
+to	O
+prevent	O
+the	O
+Republican	O
+Party	O
+from	O
+supporting	O
+the	O
+party	O
+’s	O
+president	O
+.	O
+
+They	O
+could	O
+easily	O
+succeed	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+entirety	O
+of	O
+the	O
+House	O
+and	O
+Senate	O
+of	O
+both	O
+parties	O
+is	O
+in	O
+thrall	O
+to	O
+the	O
+campaign	O
+donations	O
+of	O
+the	O
+military	O
+/	O
+security	O
+complex	O
+.	O
+
+What	O
+can	O
+President	O
+Trump	O
+do	O
+?	O
+
+He	O
+could	O
+fight	O
+,	O
+not	O
+with	O
+words	O
+on	O
+Twitter	O
+,	O
+but	O
+with	O
+the	O
+powers	O
+of	O
+the	O
+presidency	O
+.	O
+
+There	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+far	I-PROP
+more	I-PROP
+evidence	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+Russiagate	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+conspiracy	I-PROP
+against	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+President	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+United	I-PROP
+States	I-PROP
+than	I-PROP
+there	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+evidence	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+Trump	I-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+Putin	I-PROP
+conspiracy	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+steal	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+election	I-PROP
+from	I-PROP
+Hillary	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+If	B-PROP
+Mueller	I-PROP
+can	I-PROP
+indict	I-PROP
+on	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+basis	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+no	I-PROP
+evidence	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+Trump	I-PROP
+can	I-PROP
+order	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+Attorney	I-PROP
+General	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+indict	I-PROP
+on	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+basis	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+massive	I-PROP
+evidence	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+Russiagate	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+conspiracy	I-PROP
+against	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+President	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+United	I-PROP
+States	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Brennan	O
+,	O
+Comey	O
+,	O
+Clapper	O
+,	O
+Mueller	O
+,	O
+Rosenstein	O
+,	O
+McCabe	O
+,	O
+Strzok	O
+,	O
+CNN	O
+,	O
+MSNBC	O
+,	O
+Fox	O
+News	O
+,	O
+NPR	O
+,	O
+the	O
+New	O
+York	O
+Times	O
+,	O
+Washington	O
+Post	O
+,	O
+et	O
+.	O
+
+al	O
+.	O
+,	O
+are	O
+all	O
+members	O
+of	O
+the	O
+conspiracy	O
+to	O
+overthrow	B-PROP
+democracy	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+America	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+establish	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+undisputed	I-PROP
+rule	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+military	I-PROP
+/	I-PROP
+security	I-PROP
+complex	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+The	O
+idiot	B-PROP
+presstitutes	I-PROP
+’	O
+hatred	O
+of	O
+Trump	O
+might	O
+leave	O
+them	O
+unaware	O
+of	O
+the	O
+conspiracy	O
+in	O
+which	O
+they	O
+are	O
+participating	O
+,	O
+but	O
+there	O
+is	O
+no	O
+doubt	O
+that	O
+the	O
+American	B-PROP
+presstitutes	I-PROP
+are	O
+engaged	O
+in	O
+the	O
+overthrow	O
+of	O
+American	O
+democracy	O
+,	O
+however	B-PROP
+little	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+democracy	I-PROP
+still	I-PROP
+exists	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+This	O
+column	O
+is	O
+not	O
+an	O
+endorsement	O
+of	O
+Trump	O
+.	O
+
+It	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+an	I-PROP
+endorsement	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+truth	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+an	I-PROP
+endorsement	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+who	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+their	I-PROP
+distress	I-PROP
+and	O
+with	O
+the	O
+best	O
+information	O
+that	O
+they	O
+could	O
+acquire	B-PROP
+elected	I-PROP
+Donald	I-PROP
+Trump	I-PROP
+their	I-PROP
+President	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+Trump	O
+is	O
+wrong	O
+on	O
+the	O
+environment	O
+.	O
+
+Environmental	O
+protections	O
+put	O
+in	O
+place	O
+after	O
+years	O
+of	O
+struggle	O
+are	O
+being	O
+eviscerated	B-PROP
+by	O
+industry	O
+polluters	O
+who	O
+have	O
+gained	O
+controll	O
+over	O
+the	O
+environmental	O
+regulatory	O
+agencies	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+is	O
+not	O
+a	O
+unique	O
+happening	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Trump	O
+presidency	O
+.	O
+
+It	O
+began	O
+under	O
+VP	O
+Dick	O
+Cheney	O
+,	O
+the	O
+real	O
+president	O
+during	O
+the	O
+8	O
+years	O
+of	O
+the	O
+George	O
+W.	O
+Bush	O
+regime	O
+.	O
+
+Cheney	O
+turned	O
+the	O
+environmental	O
+protection	O
+regulatory	O
+agencies	O
+over	O
+to	O
+industry	O
+polluters	O
+.	O
+
+Trump	O
+is	O
+wrong	O
+on	O
+Iran	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+is	O
+in	O
+Israel	O
+’s	O
+hands	O
+,	O
+hoping	O
+that	O
+the	O
+power	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Israel	O
+Lobby	O
+can	O
+shield	O
+him	O
+from	O
+the	O
+presstitutes	O
+and	O
+the	O
+military	O
+/	O
+security	O
+complex	O
+.	O
+
+What	O
+Israel	O
+is	O
+doing	O
+by	O
+attempting	O
+to	O
+use	O
+US	O
+military	O
+force	O
+against	O
+Iran	O
+is	O
+unifying	O
+a	O
+new	O
+alliance	O
+that	O
+is	O
+too	O
+powerful	O
+for	O
+the	O
+Washington	O
+/	O
+Israeli	O
+alliance	O
+.	O
+
+Russia	O
+,	O
+China	O
+,	O
+Syria	O
+,	O
+Turkey	O
+,	O
+Iran	O
+,	O
+India	O
+,	O
+and	O
+Pakistan	O
+are	O
+the	O
+locations	O
+of	O
+populations	O
+that	O
+massively	O
+outnumber	O
+Washington	O
+’s	O
+empire	O
+.	O
+
+Each	O
+of	O
+these	O
+countries	O
+are	O
+being	O
+united	O
+by	O
+Washington	O
+’s	O
+stupid	B-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+inexplicable	I-PROP
+actions	O
+against	O
+each	O
+.	O
+
+Militarily	O
+,	O
+Israel	O
+is	O
+of	O
+no	O
+consequence	O
+.	O
+
+Twice	O
+the	O
+vaunted	O
+Israeli	O
+Army	O
+,	O
+capable	B-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+nothing	I-PROP
+but	I-PROP
+murdering	I-PROP
+unarmed	I-PROP
+women	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+children	I-PROP
+,	O
+were	O
+defeated	O
+and	O
+driven	O
+out	O
+of	O
+southern	O
+Lebanon	O
+by	O
+a	O
+few	O
+thousand	O
+Hezbollah	O
+militia	O
+.	O
+
+Israel	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+too	I-PROP
+cowardly	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+try	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+third	I-PROP
+time	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+relying	I-PROP
+on	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+stupid	I-PROP
+Americans	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+job	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+them	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+The	O
+entire	O
+world	O
+looks	O
+at	O
+America	O
+and	O
+Israel	O
+,	O
+and	O
+what	O
+does	O
+the	O
+world	O
+see	O
+?	O
+
+Two	O
+countries	O
+,	O
+both	O
+the	O
+result	O
+of	O
+exterminating	B-PROP
+the	O
+native	O
+populations	O
+,	O
+distrusted	B-PROP
+and	O
+universally	B-PROP
+hated	I-PROP
+,	O
+both	O
+of	O
+which	O
+survive	O
+by	O
+purhasing	O
+the	O
+governments	O
+of	O
+other	O
+countries	O
+and	O
+by	O
+endless	B-PROP
+lies	O
+that	O
+describe	O
+everyone	O
+but	O
+themselves	O
+and	O
+their	O
+vassals	O
+as	O
+evil	B-PROP
+criminals	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+must	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+destroyed	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+For	O
+example	O
+,	O
+the	O
+Gaza	O
+Strip	O
+,	O
+the	O
+largest	O
+concentration	O
+camp	O
+ever	O
+in	O
+the	O
+world	O
+,	O
+is	O
+being	O
+systematically	O
+destroyed	O
+along	O
+with	O
+all	O
+life	O
+within	O
+it	O
+by	O
+Israel	O
+under	O
+cover	O
+of	O
+the	O
+obvious	O
+and	O
+transparanent	O
+lie	O
+that	O
+all	O
+within	O
+Gaza	O
+are	O
+terrorists	B-PROP
+outfitted	O
+with	O
+bomb	O
+belts	O
+who	O
+are	O
+committed	O
+to	O
+the	O
+destruction	O
+of	O
+Israel	O
+.	O
+
+Not	O
+only	O
+men	O
+of	O
+fighting	O
+age	O
+,	O
+but	O
+also	O
+old	O
+men	O
+,	O
+pregnant	O
+women	O
+,	O
+children	O
+,	O
+all	O
+Palestinians	O
+are	O
+being	O
+murdered	O
+by	O
+the	O
+Israeli	O
+military	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+United	O
+States	O
+Secretary	O
+of	O
+State	O
+agrees	O
+with	O
+Israel	O
+that	O
+all	B-PROP
+Palestinians	I-PROP
+must	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+destroyed	I-PROP
+,	O
+the	O
+sooner	O
+the	O
+better	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Chinese	O
+are	O
+busy	O
+taking	O
+advantage	O
+of	O
+the	O
+financial	O
+opportunities	O
+that	O
+the	O
+idiot	B-PROP
+Americans	I-PROP
+forfeit	O
+,	O
+but	O
+otherwise	O
+do	O
+not	O
+seem	O
+to	O
+have	O
+any	O
+strategic	O
+sense	O
+of	O
+how	O
+to	O
+proceed	O
+in	O
+the	O
+drama	O
+unfolding	O
+in	O
+front	O
+of	O
+their	O
+eyes	O
+.	O
+
+For	B-PROP
+China	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+money	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+now	I-PROP
+all	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+The	O
+Russians	O
+are	O
+infected	B-PROP
+with	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+propaganda	I-PROP
+infused	I-PROP
+into	I-PROP
+their	I-PROP
+veins	I-PROP
+during	O
+the	O
+Yeltsin	O
+era	O
+when	O
+Russia	O
+was	O
+an	B-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+puppet	I-PROP
+state	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Slowly	O
+,	O
+if	O
+not	O
+surely	O
+,	O
+the	O
+Russians	B-PROP
+are	O
+coming	O
+to	O
+their	O
+senses	O
+and	O
+realizing	O
+that	O
+they	O
+have	O
+no	B-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+“	I-PROP
+partner	I-PROP
+.	O
+”	O
+
+If	O
+Trump	O
+is	O
+defeated	O
+and	O
+moved	O
+off	O
+the	O
+table	O
+,	O
+what	O
+happens	O
+when	O
+Russia	O
+and	O
+China	O
+finally	O
+realize	O
+that	O
+there	O
+is	O
+to	O
+be	O
+no	O
+conciliation	O
+with	O
+Washington	O
+?	O
+
+When	O
+all	O
+the	O
+false	O
+hopes	O
+and	O
+bets	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Russian	O
+and	O
+Chinese	O
+governments	O
+of	O
+conciliation	O
+on	O
+the	O
+basis	O
+of	O
+mutual	O
+economic	O
+interests	O
+come	O
+to	O
+naught	O
+,	O
+what	O
+happens	O
+?	O
+
+It	B-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+end	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+life	I-PROP
+on	I-PROP
+earth	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+The	B-PROP
+Russiagate	I-PROP
+“	I-PROP
+investigation	I-PROP
+”	I-PROP
+appears	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+timed	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+influence	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+midterm	I-PROP
+elections	I-PROP
+with	I-PROP
+unsubstantiated	I-PROP
+accusations	I-PROP
+made	I-PROP
+just	I-PROP
+before	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+elections	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+an	I-PROP
+attempt	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+produce	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+Democratic	I-PROP
+Congress	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+would	I-PROP
+impeach	I-PROP
+President	I-PROP
+Trump	I-PROP
+on	I-PROP
+false	I-PROP
+charges	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+The	O
+presstitutes	B-PROP
+would	O
+cover	O
+up	O
+the	O
+frameup	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+other	O
+words	O
+,	O
+the	O
+real	O
+election	O
+meddling	O
+is	O
+being	O
+done	O
+by	O
+the	O
+Russiagate	O
+“	O
+investigation	O
+.	O
+”	O
+See	O
+here	O
+and	O
+here	O
+.	O
+
+Such	O
+an	O
+impeachment	O
+would	O
+be	O
+a	O
+coup	O
+.	O
+
+The	B-PROP
+consequence	I-PROP
+would	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+deep	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+permanent	I-PROP
+divisions	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+political	I-PROP
+life	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+more	I-PROP
+rabid	I-PROP
+Russiaphobia	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+would	I-PROP
+result	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+war	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+The	B-PROP
+danger	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+real	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+Democrats	I-PROP
+’	I-PROP
+Russiagate	I-PROP
+“	I-PROP
+investigation	I-PROP
+”	I-PROP
+aided	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+abetted	I-PROP
+by	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+presstitute	I-PROP
+media	I-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+result	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+nuclear	I-PROP
+Armageddon	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Best	O
+of	O
+Paul	O
+Craig	O
+Roberts	O
+
+Horrifying	B-PROP
+Details	O
+Released	O
+:	O
+2	O
+Jihadi	B-PROP
+Muslims	I-PROP
+At	O
+Deadly	O
+NM	O
+Islamic	O
+Compound	O
+Hit	O
+With	O
+New	O
+Charges	O
+
+Siraj	O
+Ibn	O
+Wahhaj	O
+and	O
+one	O
+of	O
+his	O
+devout	O
+wives	O
+were	O
+charged	O
+with	O
+abuse	O
+of	O
+a	O
+child	O
+resulting	O
+in	O
+the	O
+death	O
+of	O
+a	O
+child	O
+and	O
+conspiracy	O
+to	O
+commit	O
+abuse	O
+of	O
+a	O
+child	O
+.	O
+
+Law	O
+enforcement	O
+rushed	O
+to	O
+destroy	O
+the	O
+Islamic	O
+compound	O
+just	O
+days	O
+after	O
+the	O
+kidnapping	O
+and	O
+murder	O
+made	O
+national	O
+news	O
+.	O
+
+They	O
+destroyed	O
+evidence	O
+,	O
+despite	O
+the	O
+fact	O
+that	O
+the	O
+investigation	O
+was	O
+new	O
+and	O
+ongoing	O
+.	O
+
+New	O
+charges	O
+were	O
+filed	O
+against	O
+the	B-PROP
+devout	I-PROP
+(	I-PROP
+“	I-PROP
+extremist	I-PROP
+)	I-PROP
+”	I-PROP
+Muslims	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+For	O
+years	O
+,	O
+the	O
+FBI	O
+and	O
+local	O
+law	O
+enforcement	O
+did	O
+nothing	O
+about	O
+this	O
+jihad	B-PROP
+compound	I-PROP
+,	O
+despite	O
+tips	O
+and	O
+numerous	O
+calls	O
+from	O
+concerned	O
+citizens	O
+.	O
+
+It	O
+took	O
+the	O
+murder	O
+of	O
+a	O
+child	O
+to	O
+get	O
+them	O
+to	O
+pay	O
+attention	O
+.	O
+
+What	O
+is	O
+the	O
+first	O
+thing	O
+they	O
+do	O
+after	O
+it	O
+is	O
+discovered	O
+a	O
+child	O
+was	O
+murdered	O
+on	O
+the	O
+compound	O
+and	O
+several	O
+starved	B-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+almost	I-PROP
+certain	I-PROP
+death	I-PROP
+?	O
+
+They	O
+destroyed	O
+the	O
+compound	O
+to	O
+cover	O
+up	O
+both	O
+their	O
+negligence	B-PROP
+and	O
+what	O
+happened	O
+there	O
+.	O
+
+News	B-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+what	I-PROP
+happened	I-PROP
+there	I-PROP
+was	I-PROP
+embarrassing	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+Muslim	I-PROP
+community	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+U.S.	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+making	I-PROP
+Islam	I-PROP
+look	I-PROP
+good	I-PROP
+seems	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+top	I-PROP
+priority	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+law	I-PROP
+enforcement	I-PROP
+officials	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+It	O
+’s	O
+sharia	O
+compliance	O
+in	O
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+.	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+
+Will	O
+Brett	O
+Kavanaugh	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Supreme	O
+Court	O
+?	O
+
+Will	O
+Brett	O
+Kavanaugh	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Supreme	O
+Court	O
+?	O
+
+Will	O
+Brett	O
+Kavanaugh	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Supreme	O
+Court	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+Yes	O
+,	O
+he	O
+will	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+.	O
+
+No	O
+,	O
+he	O
+will	O
+not	O
+be	O
+confirmed	O
+.	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Phone	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Freedom	O
+Outpost	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+Article	O
+posted	O
+with	O
+permission	O
+from	O
+Pamela	O
+Geller	O
+
+Federal	O
+judge	O
+rules	O
+against	O
+Trump	O
+administration	O
+on	O
+3-D	O
+gun	O
+blueprint	O
+case	O
+
+(	O
+This	O
+article	O
+by	O
+McClatchy	O
+-	O
+Tribune	O
+contains	O
+fake	O
+news	O
+,	O
+which	O
+we	O
+refute	O
+at	O
+the	O
+end	O
+.	O
+
+–	O
+BL	O
+)	O
+
+A	O
+federal	O
+judge	O
+on	O
+Monday	O
+issued	O
+a	O
+preliminary	O
+injunction	O
+continuing	O
+a	O
+prohibition	O
+on	O
+the	O
+Trump	O
+administration	O
+proposal	O
+to	O
+make	O
+available	O
+blueprints	O
+for	O
+so	O
+-	O
+called	O
+ghost	B-PROP
+guns	I-PROP
+,	O
+untraceable	O
+weapons	O
+that	O
+can	O
+be	O
+manufactured	O
+on	O
+a	O
+3D	O
+printer	O
+,	O
+California	O
+Attorney	O
+General	O
+Xavier	O
+Becerra	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+California	O
+was	O
+one	O
+of	O
+20	O
+states	O
+led	O
+by	O
+Washington	O
+that	O
+won	O
+the	O
+decision	O
+from	O
+U.S.	O
+District	O
+Judge	O
+Robert	O
+S.	O
+Lasnik	O
+in	O
+Seattle	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+injunction	O
+extends	O
+a	O
+ruling	O
+last	O
+month	O
+that	O
+barred	O
+the	O
+Trump	O
+administration	O
+from	O
+taking	O
+steps	O
+that	O
+would	O
+allow	O
+the	O
+firm	O
+Defense	O
+Distributed	O
+to	O
+disseminate	O
+3D	O
+gun	O
+blueprints	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+When	O
+the	O
+Trump	O
+Administration	O
+inexplicably	B-PROP
+gave	I-PROP
+the	O
+green	O
+light	O
+to	O
+distribute	O
+on	O
+the	O
+internet	O
+blueprints	O
+of	O
+3D	O
+-	O
+printed	O
+,	O
+untraceable	O
+ghost	B-PROP
+guns	I-PROP
+,	O
+it	B-PROP
+needlessly	I-PROP
+endangered	I-PROP
+our	B-PROP
+children	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+our	I-PROP
+loved	I-PROP
+ones	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+our	I-PROP
+men	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+women	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+law	I-PROP
+enforcement	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+”	I-PROP
+Becerra	O
+said	O
+in	O
+a	O
+statement	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+The	B-PROP
+Trump	I-PROP
+Administration	I-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+actions	I-PROP
+were	I-PROP
+dangerous	B-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+incompetent	I-PROP
+.	O
+”	O
+
+The	O
+action	O
+Monday	O
+keeps	O
+in	O
+place	O
+a	O
+July	O
+31	O
+court	O
+decision	O
+blocking	O
+the	O
+Trump	O
+administration	O
+pending	O
+a	O
+decision	O
+on	O
+the	O
+merits	O
+of	O
+a	O
+lawsuit	O
+by	O
+states	O
+opposed	O
+to	O
+the	O
+blueprints	O
+being	O
+published	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+The	O
+Court	O
+finds	O
+that	O
+the	O
+irreparable	O
+burdens	O
+on	O
+the	O
+private	O
+defendants	O
+’	O
+First	O
+Amendment	O
+rights	O
+are	O
+dwarfed	O
+by	O
+the	O
+irreparable	O
+harms	O
+the	O
+States	O
+are	O
+likely	O
+to	O
+suffer	O
+if	O
+the	O
+existing	O
+restrictions	O
+are	O
+withdrawn	O
+and	O
+that	O
+,	O
+overall	O
+,	O
+the	O
+public	O
+interest	O
+strongly	O
+supports	O
+maintaining	O
+the	O
+status	O
+quo	O
+through	O
+the	O
+pendency	O
+of	O
+this	O
+litigation	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Lasnik	O
+wrote	O
+in	O
+his	O
+decision	O
+.	O
+
+—	O
+Patrick	O
+McGreevy	O
+
+Los	O
+Angeles	O
+Times	O
+
+—	O
+—	O
+—	O
+
+©	O
+2018	O
+Los	O
+Angeles	O
+Times	O
+,	O
+Distributed	O
+by	O
+Tribune	O
+Content	O
+Agency	O
+,	O
+LLC	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+radical	B-PROP
+leftist	I-PROP
+gun	I-PROP
+grabbing	I-PROP
+anti	I-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+liberty	I-PROP
+California	I-PROP
+General	I-PROP
+Xavier	O
+Becerra	O
+is	O
+lying	O
+when	O
+he	O
+says	O
+the	O
+“	O
+Trump	O
+Administration	O
+inexplicably	B-PROP
+gave	I-PROP
+the	O
+green	O
+light	O
+to	O
+distribute	O
+on	O
+the	O
+internet	O
+blueprints	O
+of	O
+3D	O
+-	O
+printed	O
+,	O
+untraceable	O
+ghost	O
+guns	O
+.	O
+”	O
+The	O
+Department	O
+of	O
+Just(Us	O
+)	O
+settled	O
+a	O
+1st	O
+Amendment	O
+claim	O
+filed	O
+by	O
+Cody	O
+Wilson	O
+,	O
+who	O
+created	O
+the	O
+code	O
+for	O
+3-D	O
+guns	O
+.	O
+
+It	O
+was	O
+a	O
+case	O
+the	O
+government	O
+was	O
+about	O
+to	O
+lose	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+settlement	O
+was	O
+approved	O
+by	O
+a	O
+federal	O
+judge	O
+.	O
+
+Becerra	O
+’s	O
+statement	O
+,	O
+“	O
+it	O
+needlessly	O
+endangered	O
+our	O
+children	O
+,	O
+our	O
+loved	O
+ones	O
+and	O
+our	O
+men	O
+and	O
+women	O
+in	O
+law	O
+enforcement	O
+,	O
+”	O
+is	O
+preposterous	B-PROP
+left	I-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+wing	I-PROP
+political	I-PROP
+argle	I-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+bargle	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+I	O
+suspect	O
+the	O
+Washington	O
+judge	O
+’s	O
+stay	O
+will	O
+be	O
+overturned	O
+on	O
+appeal	O
+,	O
+but	O
+certainly	O
+will	O
+if	O
+it	O
+makes	O
+it	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Supreme	O
+Court	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+federal	O
+government	O
+has	O
+no	O
+standing	O
+to	O
+restrict	O
+speech	O
+in	O
+this	O
+manner	O
+.	O
+
+–	O
+BL	O
+
+FBI	O
+Arrests	O
+5	O
+Muslims	O
+From	O
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+Jihad	O
+Compound	O
+Days	O
+After	O
+Multiple	O
+Charges	O
+Were	O
+Dropped	O
+
+Just	O
+days	O
+after	O
+a	O
+district	O
+judge	O
+dropped	O
+all	O
+charges	O
+against	O
+three	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Muslim	B-PROP
+jihadis	I-PROP
+at	O
+the	O
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+terror	O
+compound	O
+where	O
+a	O
+child	O
+was	O
+killed	O
+and	O
+11	O
+other	O
+children	O
+were	O
+being	O
+trained	O
+to	O
+commit	O
+jihad	O
+in	O
+mass	O
+school	O
+shootings	O
+,	O
+the	O
+Federal	O
+Bureau	O
+of	O
+Investigation	O
+has	O
+stepped	O
+up	O
+to	O
+arrest	O
+five	O
+Islamists	O
+,	O
+but	O
+the	O
+charges	O
+are	O
+no	O
+longer	O
+the	O
+same	O
+.	O
+
+Remember	O
+,	O
+this	O
+all	O
+occurred	O
+because	O
+the	O
+district	O
+attorney	O
+failed	O
+to	O
+file	O
+for	O
+a	O
+preliminary	O
+hearing	O
+within	O
+10	O
+days	O
+and	O
+did	O
+n’t	O
+even	O
+bother	O
+to	O
+show	O
+up	O
+for	O
+court	O
+.	O
+
+CBN	O
+reports	O
+:	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+John	O
+Bolton	O
+Richard	O
+Grenell	O
+Dina	O
+Powell	O
+Heather	O
+Nauert	O
+Ivanka	O
+Trump	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Name	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Freedom	O
+Outpost	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+SANTA	O
+FE	O
+,	O
+N.M.	O
+(	O
+AP	O
+)	O
+-	O
+Federal	O
+prosecutors	O
+say	O
+the	O
+FBI	O
+has	O
+arrested	O
+five	O
+former	O
+residents	O
+of	O
+a	O
+ramshackle	B-PROP
+compound	I-PROP
+in	O
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+on	O
+firearms	O
+and	O
+conspiracy	O
+charges	O
+as	O
+local	O
+prosecutors	O
+dropped	O
+charges	O
+in	O
+the	O
+death	O
+of	O
+a	O
+3-year	O
+-	O
+old	O
+boy	O
+at	O
+the	O
+property	O
+.	O
+
+Taos	O
+County	O
+District	O
+Attorney	O
+Donald	O
+Gallegos	O
+said	O
+Friday	O
+his	O
+office	O
+will	O
+now	O
+seek	O
+grand	O
+jury	O
+indictments	O
+involving	O
+the	O
+death	O
+.	O
+
+Gallegos	O
+said	O
+seeking	O
+indictments	O
+will	O
+allow	O
+more	O
+time	O
+to	O
+gather	O
+evidence	O
+.	O
+
+All	O
+five	O
+people	O
+will	O
+remain	O
+in	O
+custody	O
+pending	O
+a	O
+Tuesday	O
+hearing	O
+in	O
+federal	O
+court	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+U.S.	O
+Attorney	O
+'s	O
+Office	O
+in	O
+Albuquerque	O
+said	O
+compound	O
+resident	O
+Jany	O
+Leveille	O
+has	O
+been	O
+charged	O
+with	O
+being	O
+an	O
+alien	O
+unlawfully	O
+in	O
+possession	O
+of	O
+firearms	O
+and	O
+ammunition	O
+.	O
+
+She	O
+is	O
+a	O
+Haitian	O
+national	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+other	O
+four	O
+members	O
+are	O
+charged	O
+with	O
+conspiring	O
+with	O
+Leveille	O
+.	O
+
+And	O
+the	O
+death	O
+of	O
+the	O
+three	O
+-	O
+year	O
+-	O
+old	O
+?	O
+
+Nothing	B-PROP
+!	O
+
+And	O
+what	O
+of	O
+the	O
+training	O
+of	O
+little	B-PROP
+jihadis	I-PROP
+?	O
+
+Nothing	B-PROP
+!	O
+
+“	O
+The	O
+defendants	O
+,	O
+Jany	O
+Leveille	O
+,	O
+35	O
+,	O
+a	O
+Haitian	O
+national	O
+illegally	O
+present	O
+in	O
+the	O
+United	O
+States	O
+,	O
+Siraj	O
+Ibn	O
+Wahhaj	O
+,	O
+40	O
+,	O
+Hujrah	O
+Wahhaj	O
+,	O
+37	O
+,	O
+Subhanah	O
+Wahhaj	O
+,	O
+35	O
+,	O
+and	O
+Lucas	O
+Morton	O
+,	O
+40	O
+,	O
+are	O
+charged	O
+in	O
+a	O
+criminal	O
+complaint	O
+that	O
+was	O
+filed	O
+earlier	O
+today	O
+in	O
+the	O
+U.S.	O
+District	O
+Court	O
+for	O
+the	O
+District	O
+of	O
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+,	O
+”	O
+the	O
+bureau	O
+said	O
+in	O
+a	O
+statement	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+The	O
+criminal	O
+complaint	O
+charges	O
+Jany	O
+Leveille	O
+with	O
+being	O
+an	O
+alien	O
+unlawfully	O
+in	O
+possession	O
+of	O
+firearms	O
+and	O
+ammunition	O
+in	O
+the	O
+District	O
+of	O
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+from	O
+Nov.	O
+2017	O
+through	O
+Aug.	O
+2018	O
+,	O
+”	O
+the	O
+bureau	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+The	O
+criminal	O
+complaint	O
+charges	O
+the	O
+other	O
+four	O
+defendants	O
+with	O
+aiding	O
+and	O
+abetting	O
+Leveille	O
+in	O
+committing	O
+the	O
+offense	O
+,	O
+and	O
+with	O
+conspiring	O
+with	O
+Leveille	O
+to	O
+commit	O
+the	O
+offense	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Yet	O
+,	O
+in	O
+the	O
+midst	O
+of	O
+all	O
+of	O
+this	O
+,	O
+do	O
+n't	O
+forget	O
+that	O
+the	O
+FBI	O
+ignore	O
+the	O
+intelligence	O
+that	O
+was	O
+provided	O
+to	O
+them	O
+,	O
+just	O
+like	O
+they	O
+have	O
+in	O
+many	O
+cases	O
+,	O
+which	O
+,	O
+if	O
+they	O
+had	O
+acted	O
+,	O
+they	O
+may	O
+have	O
+saved	O
+the	O
+little	O
+boy	O
+'s	O
+life	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+the	O
+meantime	O
+,	O
+the	O
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+district	O
+attorney	O
+who	O
+failed	O
+to	O
+file	O
+for	O
+a	O
+preliminary	O
+hearing	O
+within	O
+10	O
+days	O
+and	O
+did	O
+n’t	O
+show	O
+up	O
+for	O
+court	O
+is	O
+vowing	O
+to	O
+pursue	O
+prosecution	O
+of	O
+these	O
+jihadis	B-PROP
+.	O
+
+“	O
+The	O
+actions	O
+yesterday	O
+by	O
+the	O
+district	O
+judges	O
+do	O
+not	O
+affect	O
+our	O
+continuing	O
+efforts	O
+to	O
+prosecute	O
+the	O
+individuals	O
+as	O
+charged	O
+originally	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Eighth	O
+Judicial	O
+District	O
+Attorney	O
+Donald	O
+Gallegos	O
+said	O
+in	O
+a	O
+statement	O
+on	O
+Thursday	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+While	O
+we	O
+disagree	O
+with	O
+the	O
+judges	O
+,	O
+they	O
+did	O
+their	O
+jobs	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+will	O
+continue	O
+to	O
+do	O
+ours	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Going	O
+forward	O
+,	O
+our	O
+options	O
+are	O
+to	O
+refile	O
+the	O
+charges	O
+or	O
+take	O
+the	O
+cases	O
+to	O
+the	O
+grand	O
+jury	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+are	O
+assessing	O
+and	O
+will	O
+decide	O
+which	O
+avenue	O
+to	O
+pursue	O
+.	O
+
+What	O
+is	O
+important	O
+to	O
+know	O
+is	O
+that	O
+we	O
+will	O
+continue	O
+to	O
+pursue	O
+prosecution	O
+of	O
+the	O
+cases	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+StatementThe	O
+actions	O
+yesterday	O
+by	O
+the	O
+district	O
+judges	O
+do	O
+not	O
+affect	O
+our	O
+continuing	O
+efforts	O
+to	O
+prosecute	O
+the	O
+...	O
+Posted	O
+by	O
+Eighth	O
+Judicial	O
+District	O
+Attorney	O
+on	O
+Thursday	O
+,	O
+August	O
+30	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+He	O
+also	O
+sought	O
+to	O
+fight	O
+back	O
+against	O
+criticism	O
+in	O
+his	O
+failure	O
+to	O
+perform	O
+his	O
+job	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Finally	O
+,	O
+I	O
+have	O
+always	O
+welcomed	O
+criticism	O
+and	O
+,	O
+as	O
+public	O
+servants	O
+,	O
+our	O
+judges	O
+should	O
+also	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Gallegos	O
+said	O
+in	O
+the	O
+statement	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+However	O
+,	O
+I	O
+ask	O
+that	O
+you	O
+be	O
+civil	O
+and	O
+respectful	O
+in	O
+your	O
+criticisms	O
+as	O
+that	O
+is	O
+more	O
+constructive	O
+.	O
+
+Cussing	B-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+threatening	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+involved	I-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+not	I-PROP
+accomplish	I-PROP
+justice	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+serves	I-PROP
+no	I-PROP
+useful	I-PROP
+purpose	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Remember	O
+,	O
+you	O
+do	O
+not	O
+have	O
+all	O
+the	O
+facts	O
+.	O
+
+That	O
+will	O
+develop	O
+as	O
+the	O
+cases	O
+progress	O
+.	O
+"	O
+
+Yeah	B-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+well	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+'s	I-PROP
+about	I-PROP
+as	I-PROP
+trustworthy	I-PROP
+as	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+FBI	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+this	I-PROP
+matter	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+This	O
+latest	O
+move	O
+,	O
+while	O
+welcome	O
+,	O
+may	O
+only	O
+be	O
+a	O
+response	O
+to	O
+President	O
+Donald	O
+Trump	O
+'s	O
+vow	O
+to	O
+"	O
+get	O
+involved	O
+.	O
+"	O
+
+However	O
+,	O
+I	O
+ask	O
+,	O
+why	O
+were	O
+you	O
+not	O
+involved	O
+in	O
+the	O
+first	O
+place	O
+,	O
+Mr.	O
+President	O
+?	O
+
+According	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Constitution	O
+,	O
+you	O
+,	O
+and	O
+you	O
+alone	O
+,	O
+are	O
+the	O
+sole	O
+head	O
+of	O
+the	O
+executive	O
+branch	O
+,	O
+and	O
+as	O
+such	O
+you	O
+are	O
+where	O
+the	O
+buck	O
+stop	O
+in	O
+making	O
+sure	O
+the	O
+laws	O
+are	O
+faithfully	O
+executed	O
+.	O
+
+So	B-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+if	I-PROP
+Trump	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+going	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+fire	I-PROP
+Sessions	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+perhaps	I-PROP
+he	I-PROP
+should	I-PROP
+stop	I-PROP
+talking	I-PROP
+about	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+get	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+actually	I-PROP
+put	I-PROP
+someone	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+Justice	I-PROP
+Department	I-PROP
+as	I-PROP
+attorney	I-PROP
+general	I-PROP
+who	I-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+job	I-PROP
+faithfully	I-PROP
+,	O
+and	O
+by	O
+that	O
+,	O
+I	O
+do	O
+n't	O
+mean	O
+Trey	O
+Gowdy	O
+.	O
+
+I	O
+mean	O
+someone	O
+who	O
+is	O
+serious	O
+about	O
+justice	O
+,	O
+not	O
+political	O
+grandstanding	O
+or	O
+covering	O
+up	O
+criminal	O
+activity	O
+.	O
+
+Until	O
+then	O
+,	O
+I	O
+'ll	O
+consider	O
+this	O
+the	O
+means	O
+the	O
+FBI	O
+will	O
+use	O
+to	O
+engage	O
+in	O
+the	O
+further	O
+coverup	O
+of	O
+what	O
+really	O
+took	O
+place	O
+at	O
+that	O
+compound	O
+beyond	O
+the	O
+bulldozing	B-PROP
+of	O
+a	O
+crime	O
+scene	O
+,	O
+and	O
+possibly	O
+,	O
+their	O
+own	O
+complicity	O
+.	O
+
+Article	O
+posted	O
+with	O
+permission	O
+from	O
+Sons	O
+Of	O
+Liberty	O
+Media	O
+
+FBI	O
+:	O
+Muslim	O
+Teen	O
+From	O
+NM	O
+Islamic	O
+Compound	O
+Trained	O
+For	O
+Jihad	O
+:	O
+"	O
+Raise	O
+An	O
+Army	O
+"	O
+"	O
+Killing	O
+Non	O
+-	O
+Believers	O
+On	O
+Behalf	O
+Of	O
+Allah	O
+"	O
+
+It	O
+was	O
+a	O
+jihad	B-PROP
+training	I-PROP
+camp	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Raising	B-PROP
+an	I-PROP
+army	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+jihad	I-PROP
+slaughter	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+And	O
+their	O
+defense	O
+is	O
+“	O
+freedom	O
+of	O
+religion	O
+,	O
+”	O
+calling	O
+this	O
+prosecution	O
+“	O
+islamophobia	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+The	O
+enemedia	O
+is	O
+scrubbing	O
+and	O
+censoring	O
+this	O
+story	O
+–	O
+but	O
+it	O
+is	O
+just	O
+as	O
+we	O
+have	O
+warned	O
+/	O
+predicted	O
+for	O
+years	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+an	O
+affidavit	O
+filed	O
+in	O
+support	O
+of	O
+a	O
+criminal	O
+complaint	O
+,	O
+an	O
+FBI	O
+special	O
+agent	O
+wrote	O
+that	O
+Leveille	O
+’s	O
+13-year	O
+-	O
+old	O
+son	O
+told	O
+investigators	O
+that	O
+his	O
+mother	O
+’s	O
+boyfriend	O
+,	O
+Siraj	O
+Ibn	O
+Wahhaj	O
+,	O
+40	O
+,	O
+wanted	O
+to	O
+“	O
+get	O
+an	O
+army	O
+together	O
+”	O
+and	O
+train	O
+them	O
+for	O
+jihad	O
+.	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+John	O
+Bolton	O
+Richard	O
+Grenell	O
+Dina	O
+Powell	O
+Heather	O
+Nauert	O
+Ivanka	O
+Trump	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Name	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Freedom	O
+Outpost	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+boy	O
+told	O
+agents	O
+that	O
+Ibn	O
+Wahhaj	O
+trained	O
+him	O
+and	O
+another	O
+of	O
+Leveille	O
+’s	O
+teenage	O
+sons	O
+in	O
+firearms	O
+and	O
+military	O
+techniques	O
+,	O
+including	O
+rapid	O
+reloads	O
+and	O
+hand	O
+-	O
+to	O
+-	O
+hand	O
+combat	O
+,	O
+and	O
+told	O
+them	O
+jihad	O
+meant	O
+killing	O
+non	O
+-	O
+believers	O
+on	O
+behalf	O
+of	O
+Allah	O
+,	O
+according	O
+to	O
+the	O
+affidavit	O
+filed	O
+in	O
+U.S.	O
+District	O
+Court	O
+in	O
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+.	O
+
+[	O
+…	O
+]	O
+Defense	O
+lawyers	O
+have	O
+said	O
+that	O
+the	O
+five	O
+adults	O
+were	O
+exercising	O
+their	O
+constitutional	O
+rights	O
+to	O
+practice	O
+their	O
+religion	O
+and	O
+own	O
+firearms	O
+,	O
+and	O
+that	O
+the	O
+group	O
+is	O
+being	O
+discriminated	O
+against	O
+because	O
+they	O
+are	O
+black	O
+and	O
+Muslim	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+defense	O
+attorneys	O
+could	O
+not	O
+immediately	O
+be	O
+reached	O
+for	O
+comment	O
+on	O
+Saturday	O
+.	O
+
+There	O
+it	O
+is	O
+.	O
+
+TEEN	O
+FROM	O
+NEW	O
+MEXICO	O
+COMPOUND	O
+SAYS	O
+HE	O
+WAS	O
+TRAINED	O
+FOR	O
+JIHAD	O
+:	O
+FBI	O
+TAOS	O
+,	O
+N.M.	O
+(	O
+REUTERS	O
+)	O
+–	O
+A	O
+13-YEAR	O
+-	O
+OLD	O
+BOY	O
+WHO	O
+WAS	O
+PART	O
+OF	O
+GROUP	O
+TAKEN	O
+INTO	O
+CUSTODY	O
+AT	O
+A	O
+SQUALID	B-PROP
+NEW	O
+MEXICO	O
+COMPOUND	O
+LAST	O
+MONTH	O
+HAS	O
+TOLD	O
+FBI	O
+AGENTS	O
+HIS	O
+MOTHER	O
+’S	O
+BOYFRIEND	O
+WAS	O
+TRAINING	O
+HIM	O
+TO	O
+CONDUCT	O
+“	O
+JIHAD	B-PROP
+”	I-PROP
+AGAINST	O
+NON	B-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+BELIEVERS	I-PROP
+,	O
+ACCORDING	O
+TO	O
+FEDERAL	O
+COURT	O
+DOCUMENTS	O
+.	O
+
+By	O
+Andrew	O
+Hay	O
+,	O
+Reuters	O
+,	O
+September	O
+2	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+:	O
+The	O
+boy	O
+was	O
+among	O
+11	O
+children	O
+and	O
+five	O
+adults	O
+living	O
+at	O
+the	O
+compound	O
+in	O
+Taos	O
+County	O
+when	O
+it	O
+was	O
+raided	O
+on	O
+Aug.	O
+3	O
+by	O
+local	O
+sheriff	O
+’s	O
+deputies	O
+who	O
+discovered	O
+a	O
+cache	O
+of	O
+firearms	O
+and	O
+the	O
+children	O
+living	O
+without	O
+food	O
+or	O
+clean	O
+water	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+dead	O
+body	O
+of	O
+a	O
+three	O
+-	O
+year	O
+-	O
+old	O
+boy	O
+was	O
+found	O
+buried	O
+at	O
+the	O
+site	O
+later	O
+They	O
+initially	O
+faced	O
+state	O
+charges	O
+,	O
+then	O
+on	O
+Friday	O
+,	O
+the	O
+five	O
+adults	O
+including	O
+a	O
+Haitian	O
+woman	O
+described	O
+as	O
+the	O
+group	O
+’s	O
+leader	O
+,	O
+35-year	O
+-	O
+old	O
+Jany	O
+Leveille	O
+,	O
+were	O
+arrested	O
+by	O
+the	O
+Federal	O
+Bureau	O
+of	O
+Investigation	O
+and	O
+accused	O
+of	O
+conspiracy	O
+and	O
+firearms	O
+offenses	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+an	O
+affidavit	O
+filed	O
+in	O
+support	O
+of	O
+a	O
+criminal	O
+complaint	O
+,	O
+an	O
+FBI	O
+special	O
+agent	O
+wrote	O
+that	O
+Leveille	O
+’s	O
+13-year	O
+-	O
+old	O
+son	O
+told	O
+investigators	O
+that	O
+his	O
+mother	O
+’s	O
+boyfriend	O
+,	O
+Siraj	O
+Ibn	O
+Wahhaj	O
+,	O
+40	O
+,	O
+wanted	O
+to	O
+“	O
+get	O
+an	O
+army	O
+together	O
+”	O
+and	O
+train	O
+them	O
+for	O
+jihad	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+boy	O
+told	O
+agents	O
+that	O
+Ibn	O
+Wahhaj	O
+trained	O
+him	O
+and	O
+another	O
+of	O
+Leveille	O
+’s	O
+teenage	O
+sons	O
+in	O
+firearms	O
+and	O
+military	O
+techniques	O
+,	O
+including	O
+rapid	O
+reloads	O
+and	O
+hand	O
+-	O
+to	O
+-	O
+hand	O
+combat	O
+,	O
+and	O
+told	O
+them	O
+jihad	O
+meant	O
+killing	O
+non	O
+-	O
+believers	O
+on	O
+behalf	O
+of	O
+Allah	O
+,	O
+according	O
+to	O
+the	O
+affidavit	O
+filed	O
+in	O
+U.S.	O
+District	O
+Court	O
+in	O
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+13-year	O
+-	O
+old	O
+also	O
+told	O
+the	O
+FBI	O
+that	O
+his	O
+mother	O
+believed	O
+she	O
+received	O
+messages	O
+from	O
+God	O
+,	O
+and	O
+that	O
+he	O
+watched	O
+her	O
+and	O
+Ibn	O
+Wahhaj	O
+perform	O
+supposed	O
+“	O
+exorcism	B-PROP
+”	O
+rituals	O
+over	O
+the	O
+three	O
+-	O
+year	O
+-	O
+old	O
+boy	O
+,	O
+including	O
+one	O
+during	O
+which	O
+the	O
+boy	O
+choked	O
+and	O
+his	O
+heart	O
+stopped	O
+,	O
+according	O
+to	O
+the	O
+special	O
+agent	O
+’s	O
+affidavit	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+teenager	O
+said	O
+his	O
+mother	O
+and	O
+others	O
+at	O
+the	O
+compound	O
+told	O
+him	O
+not	O
+to	O
+talk	O
+to	O
+anyone	O
+about	O
+the	O
+three	O
+-	O
+year	O
+-	O
+old	O
+ever	O
+being	O
+at	O
+the	O
+compound	O
+because	O
+they	B-PROP
+would	I-PROP
+“	B-PROP
+all	I-PROP
+go	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+jail	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+”	I-PROP
+Defense	O
+lawyers	O
+have	O
+said	O
+that	O
+the	O
+five	O
+adults	O
+were	O
+exercising	O
+their	O
+constitutional	O
+rights	O
+to	O
+practice	O
+their	O
+religion	O
+and	O
+own	O
+firearms	O
+,	O
+and	O
+that	O
+the	O
+group	O
+is	O
+being	O
+discriminated	O
+against	O
+because	O
+they	O
+are	O
+black	O
+and	O
+Muslim	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+defense	O
+attorneys	O
+could	O
+not	O
+immediately	O
+be	O
+reached	O
+for	O
+comment	O
+on	O
+Saturday	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+five	O
+defendants	O
+came	O
+under	O
+FBI	O
+surveillance	O
+in	O
+May	O
+after	O
+Leveille	O
+wrote	O
+a	O
+letter	O
+to	O
+Ibn	O
+Wahhaj	O
+’s	O
+brother	O
+asking	O
+him	O
+to	O
+join	O
+them	O
+and	O
+become	O
+a	O
+“	O
+martyr	O
+,	O
+”	O
+state	O
+prosecutors	O
+have	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+They	O
+are	O
+due	O
+to	O
+appear	O
+in	O
+court	O
+in	O
+Albuquerque	O
+on	O
+Tuesday	O
+.	O
+
+Article	O
+posted	O
+with	O
+permission	O
+from	O
+Pamela	O
+Geller	O
+
+Pit	O
+Bull	O
+Journalist	O
+Hounds	O
+Keith	O
+Ellison	O
+Over	O
+Abuse	O
+Of	O
+Women	O
+-	O
+Watch	O
+Him	O
+Flee	O
+!	O
+
+Investigative	O
+journalist	O
+Laura	O
+Loomer	O
+tracked	O
+down	O
+Rep.	O
+Keith	O
+Ellison	O
+(	O
+D	O
+-	O
+MN	O
+)	O
+,	O
+aka	O
+Hakim	O
+Muhammad	O
+,	O
+at	O
+an	O
+event	O
+he	O
+was	O
+at	O
+on	O
+Saturday	O
+and	O
+questioned	O
+him	O
+about	O
+the	O
+police	O
+reports	O
+filed	O
+against	O
+him	O
+by	O
+women	O
+who	O
+claimed	O
+he	O
+abused	O
+them	O
+.	O
+
+With	O
+documents	O
+in	O
+hand	O
+,	O
+Loomer	O
+hounded	O
+Ellison	O
+,	O
+asking	O
+him	O
+if	O
+he	O
+would	O
+respond	O
+to	O
+the	O
+reports	O
+,	O
+but	O
+the	O
+Democrat	O
+candidate	O
+for	O
+attorney	O
+general	O
+of	O
+Minnesota	O
+,	O
+despite	O
+the	O
+fact	O
+he	O
+does	O
+n't	O
+have	O
+an	O
+active	O
+license	O
+to	O
+practice	O
+law	O
+,	O
+would	O
+not	O
+answer	O
+,	O
+but	O
+tried	O
+to	O
+flee	O
+like	B-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+frightened	I-PROP
+puppy	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+I	O
+'m	O
+posting	O
+the	O
+video	O
+from	O
+Facebook	O
+and	O
+Youtube	O
+.	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+John	O
+Bolton	O
+Richard	O
+Grenell	O
+Dina	O
+Powell	O
+Heather	O
+Nauert	O
+Ivanka	O
+Trump	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Comments	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Freedom	O
+Outpost	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+Keith	O
+Ellison	O
+CONFRONTED	O
+About	O
+Domestic	O
+Violence	O
+Allegations	O
+Produced	O
+by	O
+Sean	O
+CampbellAs	O
+he	O
+arrived	O
+for	O
+a	O
+campaign	O
+event	O
+in	O
+Minnesota	O
+on	O
+Saturday	O
+,	O
+Rep.	O
+Keith	O
+Ellison	O
+(	O
+D	O
+-	O
+MN	O
+)	O
+was	O
+confronted	O
+by	O
+investigative	O
+journalist	O
+Laura	O
+Loomer	O
+about	O
+the	O
+numerous	O
+domestic	O
+violence	O
+allegations	O
+that	O
+have	O
+been	O
+brought	O
+against	O
+him	O
+by	O
+two	O
+different	O
+women	O
+.	O
+Loomer	O
+questioned	O
+Ellison	O
+about	O
+a	O
+2005	O
+police	O
+report	O
+filed	O
+by	O
+Amy	O
+Alexander	O
+,	O
+a	O
+Democrat	B-PROP
+activist	I-PROP
+who	O
+he	O
+had	O
+a	O
+relationship	O
+with	O
+.	O
+
+With	O
+the	O
+police	O
+report	O
+in	O
+hand	O
+,	O
+Loomer	O
+asked	O
+Ellison	O
+to	O
+explain	O
+why	O
+the	O
+police	O
+report	O
+says	O
+there	O
+was	O
+a	O
+domestic	O
+violence	O
+call	O
+to	O
+Alexander	O
+'s	O
+house	O
+,	O
+despite	O
+the	O
+fact	O
+that	O
+Ellison	O
+has	O
+denied	O
+the	O
+allegations	O
+.	O
+Please	O
+Support	O
+my	O
+Independent	O
+Journalism	O
+:	O
+http://bit.ly/loomeredTHANK	O
+YOU	O
+IN	O
+ADVANCE	O
+FOR	O
+YOUR	O
+CONTRIBUTION	O
+!	O
+
+Posted	O
+by	O
+Laura	O
+Loomer	O
+on	O
+Monday	O
+,	O
+September	O
+3	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+His	O
+supporters	O
+continuously	O
+tried	O
+to	O
+block	O
+Loomer	O
+,	O
+even	O
+trying	O
+to	O
+put	O
+their	O
+hands	O
+on	O
+her	O
+,	O
+cover	O
+up	O
+her	O
+camera	O
+and	O
+getting	O
+in	O
+her	O
+way	O
+of	O
+asking	O
+honest	O
+answers	O
+that	O
+Ellison	O
+owes	O
+the	O
+people	O
+whom	O
+he	O
+is	O
+asking	O
+to	O
+vote	O
+for	O
+him	O
+.	O
+
+Loomer	O
+asked	O
+why	O
+the	O
+police	O
+were	O
+called	O
+to	O
+Amy	O
+Alexander	O
+'s	O
+house	O
+in	O
+2005	O
+over	O
+domestic	O
+violence	O
+.	O
+
+Ellison	O
+was	O
+in	O
+a	O
+relationship	O
+with	O
+Alexander	O
+at	O
+that	O
+time	O
+,	O
+but	O
+has	O
+denied	O
+the	O
+allegations	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+fails	O
+,	O
+however	O
+,	O
+to	O
+relay	O
+his	O
+side	O
+of	O
+the	O
+story	O
+.	O
+
+However	O
+,	O
+911	O
+call	O
+documents	O
+show	O
+that	O
+Alexander	O
+named	O
+Ellison	O
+as	O
+her	O
+assaulter	O
+.	O
+
+#	O
+MnAg	O
+—	O
+—	O
+>	O
+RT	O
+@jpkolb	O
+:	O
+UPDATE	O
+:	O
+This	O
+is	O
+a	O
+record	O
+of	O
+a	O
+911	O
+call	O
+from	O
+May	O
+16	O
+,	O
+2005	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+caller	O
+reported	O
+she	O
+was	O
+assaulted	O
+by	O
+Keith	O
+Ellison	O
+.	O
+
+pic.twitter.com/bVmrrZHC3h	O
+—	O
+JohnGilmore	O
+(	O
+@Shabbosgoy	O
+)	O
+August	O
+13	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+Alexander	O
+is	O
+not	O
+the	O
+only	O
+woman	O
+to	O
+make	O
+abuse	O
+accusations	O
+against	O
+Ellison	O
+.	O
+
+On	O
+August	O
+11	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+,	O
+a	O
+woman	O
+by	O
+the	O
+name	O
+of	O
+Karen	O
+Monahan	O
+accused	O
+Ellison	O
+of	O
+being	O
+physically	O
+and	O
+verbally	O
+abusive	O
+towards	O
+her	O
+.	O
+
+.	O
+
+@Jerickaduncan	O
+to	O
+Karen	O
+Monahan	O
+,	O
+who	O
+accuses	O
+ex	O
+-	O
+boyfriend	O
+Rep.	O
+Keith	O
+Ellison	O
+of	O
+domestic	O
+abuse	O
+in	O
+9/2016	O
+incident	O
+:	O
+"	O
+Did	O
+you	O
+call	O
+anybody	O
+after	O
+that	O
+?	O
+"	O
+
+Monahan	O
+:	O
+"	O
+I	O
+called	O
+a	O
+friend	O
+,	O
+&	O
+I	O
+said	O
+,	O
+'	O
+I	O
+'m	O
+at	B-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+lowest	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+low	I-PROP
+.	O
+'	O
+"	O
+
+Ellison	O
+denies	O
+the	O
+allegations	O
+.	O
+
+https://t.co/w6GFpTp758	O
+pic.twitter.com/ISMgRoFBvs	O
+—	O
+CBS	O
+Evening	O
+News	O
+(	O
+@CBSEveningNews	O
+)	O
+August	O
+17	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+CBS	O
+NEWS	O
+EXCLUSIVE	O
+:	O
+@Jerickaduncan	O
+sits	O
+down	O
+with	O
+the	O
+woman	O
+alleging	O
+Rep.	O
+Keith	O
+Ellison	O
+(	O
+D	O
+-	O
+MN	O
+)	O
+physically	O
+abused	O
+her	O
+in	O
+2016	O
+.	O
+
+Ellison	O
+has	O
+denied	O
+the	O
+allegations	O
+.	O
+
+https://t.co/kLFpBkZYMo	O
+pic.twitter.com/3eXXAQgc6o	O
+—	O
+CBS	O
+Evening	O
+News	O
+(	O
+@CBSEveningNews	O
+)	O
+August	O
+16	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+Her	O
+son	O
+posted	O
+the	O
+allegations	O
+on	O
+Twitter	O
+as	O
+his	O
+mother	O
+posted	O
+them	O
+to	O
+Twitter	O
+.	O
+
+Please	O
+read	O
+,	O
+if	O
+you	O
+care	O
+about	O
+my	O
+mother	O
+please	O
+share	O
+.	O
+I	O
+love	O
+you	O
+momma	O
+,	O
+you	O
+wo	O
+nt	O
+have	O
+to	O
+stand	O
+...	O
+Posted	O
+by	O
+Austin	O
+Aslim	O
+Monahan	O
+on	O
+Saturday	O
+,	O
+August	O
+11	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+I	O
+am	O
+so	O
+proud	O
+of	O
+my	O
+son	O
+for	O
+his	O
+courage	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+this	O
+situation	O
+impacted	O
+me	O
+.	O
+
+If	O
+you	O
+have	O
+anything	O
+to	O
+say	O
+,	O
+please	O
+say	O
+it	O
+me	O
+and	O
+leave	O
+him	O
+out	O
+of	O
+it	O
+.	O
+
+No	O
+nasty	B-PROP
+comments	O
+to	O
+him	O
+https://t.co/UC84loHz1	O
+m	O
+—	O
+Karen	O
+Monahan	O
+(	O
+@KarenMonahan01	O
+)	O
+August	O
+12	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+I	O
+shut	O
+down	O
+my	O
+facebook	O
+2	O
+days	O
+ago	O
+because	O
+I	O
+did	O
+n’t	O
+want	O
+my	O
+kids	O
+seeing	O
+post	O
+people	O
+were	O
+posting	O
+to	O
+me	O
+.	O
+
+I	O
+really	O
+ca	O
+n’t	O
+activate	O
+it	O
+now	O
+cause	O
+will	O
+be	O
+worse	O
+for	O
+them	O
+.	O
+
+My	O
+son	O
+is	O
+getting	O
+bullied	O
+on	O
+FB	O
+,	O
+DO	O
+NOT	O
+BULLY	O
+MY	O
+KIDS	O
+.	O
+
+tweet	O
+to	O
+me	O
+and	O
+leave	O
+them	O
+out	O
+of	O
+it	O
+—	O
+Karen	O
+Monahan	O
+(	O
+@KarenMonahan01	O
+)	O
+August	O
+12	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+What	O
+my	O
+son	O
+said	O
+is	O
+true	O
+.	O
+
+Every	O
+statement	O
+he	O
+made	O
+was	O
+true	O
+.	O
+
+@keithellison	O
+,	O
+you	B-PROP
+know	I-PROP
+you	I-PROP
+did	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+me	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+I	O
+have	O
+given	O
+every	O
+opportunity	O
+to	O
+get	O
+help	O
+and	O
+heal	O
+.	O
+
+Even	O
+now	O
+,	O
+u	O
+r	O
+willing	O
+to	O
+say	O
+my	O
+son	O
+is	O
+lying	O
+and	O
+have	O
+me	O
+continue	O
+to	O
+leak	O
+more	O
+text	O
+and	O
+info	O
+just	O
+so	O
+others	O
+will	O
+believe	O
+him	O
+—	O
+Karen	O
+Monahan	O
+(	O
+@KarenMonahan01	O
+)	O
+August	O
+12	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+What	O
+'s	O
+amazing	O
+is	O
+that	O
+Democrats	O
+cover	O
+for	O
+their	O
+own	O
+,	O
+ignoring	O
+the	O
+obvious	O
+hypocrisy	O
+they	O
+demonstrate	O
+when	O
+they	O
+opponents	O
+are	O
+accused	O
+of	O
+such	O
+things	O
+.	O
+
+Even	O
+one	O
+woman	O
+in	O
+the	O
+Loomer	O
+video	O
+says	O
+,	O
+why	O
+are	O
+they	O
+waiting	O
+till	O
+now	O
+to	O
+bring	O
+this	O
+forward	O
+?	O
+
+Well	O
+,	O
+for	O
+Ms.	O
+Monahan	O
+,	O
+perhaps	O
+that	O
+could	O
+be	O
+asked	O
+,	O
+but	O
+not	O
+for	O
+Amy	O
+Alexander	O
+.	O
+
+That	O
+report	O
+was	O
+filed	O
+more	O
+than	O
+a	O
+decade	O
+ago	O
+.	O
+
+It	O
+appears	O
+that	O
+with	O
+Ms.	O
+Monahan	O
+'s	O
+claims	O
+and	O
+Keith	O
+Ellison	O
+'s	O
+unwillingness	O
+to	O
+address	O
+the	O
+public	O
+with	O
+his	O
+side	O
+of	O
+the	O
+story	O
+that	O
+perhaps	O
+,	O
+he	O
+has	O
+not	O
+changed	O
+his	O
+ways	O
+at	O
+all	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+fact	O
+,	O
+he	O
+can	O
+more	O
+than	O
+likely	O
+justify	O
+his	O
+actions	O
+based	O
+upon	O
+the	O
+demonic	B-PROP
+teachings	I-PROP
+of	O
+Muhammad	O
+in	O
+the	O
+Koran	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+has	O
+already	O
+won	O
+the	O
+primary	O
+to	O
+be	O
+Minnesota	O
+'s	O
+AG	O
+.	O
+
+Will	B-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+not	I-PROP
+demand	I-PROP
+justice	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+vote	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+Communist	I-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+backed	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+Muslim	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+accused	I-PROP
+woman	I-PROP
+abuser	I-PROP
+into	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+office	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+prosecuting	I-PROP
+criminals	I-PROP
+?	I-PROP
+
+Article	O
+posted	O
+with	O
+permission	O
+from	O
+Sons	O
+Of	O
+Liberty	O
+Media	O
+
+Texas	O
+:	O
+Cop	O
+Walks	O
+Into	O
+Home	O
+She	O
+Thought	O
+Was	O
+Hers	O
+,	O
+Kills	O
+Innocent	O
+Homeowner	O
+—	O
+Not	O
+Arrested	O
+
+Dallas	O
+,	O
+TX	O
+—	O
+Highlighting	O
+the	B-PROP
+sheer	I-PROP
+insane	I-PROP
+state	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+law	I-PROP
+enforcement	I-PROP
+in	O
+America	O
+today	O
+is	O
+a	O
+tragic	B-PROP
+story	O
+out	O
+of	O
+Dallas	O
+this	O
+week	O
+.	O
+
+An	O
+off	O
+-	O
+duty	O
+police	O
+officer	O
+walked	O
+into	O
+the	O
+wrong	O
+home	O
+after	O
+getting	O
+off	O
+shift	O
+,	O
+thought	O
+the	O
+homeowner	O
+was	O
+an	O
+intruder	O
+,	O
+and	O
+killed	O
+him	O
+.	O
+
+And	O
+,	O
+she	O
+has	O
+not	O
+yet	O
+been	O
+arrested	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+victim	O
+was	O
+26-year	O
+-	O
+old	O
+Bothan	O
+Shem	O
+Jean	O
+who	O
+was	O
+most	O
+likely	O
+startled	O
+by	O
+someone	O
+coming	O
+into	O
+his	O
+home	O
+at	O
+10:00	O
+pm	O
+when	O
+the	O
+unnamed	O
+officer	O
+opened	O
+his	O
+door	O
+.	O
+
+While	O
+the	O
+details	O
+surrounding	O
+how	O
+Jean	O
+was	O
+killed	O
+are	O
+unclear	O
+,	O
+according	O
+to	O
+police	O
+,	O
+the	O
+officer	O
+admitted	O
+to	O
+killing	O
+him	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+a	O
+statement	O
+released	O
+on	O
+Friday	O
+,	O
+Dallas	O
+police	O
+said	O
+their	O
+officer	O
+called	O
+them	O
+after	O
+shooting	O
+Jean	O
+and	O
+told	O
+responding	O
+officers	O
+that	O
+“	O
+she	O
+entered	O
+the	O
+victim	O
+’s	O
+apartment	O
+believing	O
+that	O
+it	O
+was	O
+her	O
+own	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+John	O
+Bolton	O
+Richard	O
+Grenell	O
+Dina	O
+Powell	O
+Heather	O
+Nauert	O
+Ivanka	O
+Trump	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Comments	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Freedom	O
+Outpost	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+On	O
+September	O
+6	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+at	O
+about	O
+9:59	O
+p.m.	O
+,	O
+an	O
+off	O
+duty	O
+Dallas	O
+Police	O
+officer	O
+called	O
+police	O
+dispatch	O
+and	O
+said	O
+she	O
+was	O
+involved	O
+in	O
+a	O
+shooting	O
+at	O
+the	O
+apartments	O
+located	O
+at	O
+1210	O
+S.	O
+Lamar	O
+.	O
+
+Preliminary	O
+information	O
+suggests	O
+that	O
+the	O
+officer	O
+arrived	O
+home	O
+in	O
+full	O
+uniform	O
+after	O
+working	O
+a	O
+full	O
+shift	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+officer	O
+reported	O
+to	O
+the	O
+responding	O
+officers	O
+that	O
+she	O
+entered	O
+the	O
+victim	O
+’s	O
+apartment	O
+believing	O
+that	O
+it	O
+was	O
+her	O
+own	O
+.	O
+
+At	O
+some	O
+point	O
+,	O
+the	O
+officer	O
+fired	O
+her	O
+weapon	O
+striking	O
+the	O
+victim	O
+.	O
+
+Responding	O
+officers	O
+administered	O
+aid	O
+to	O
+the	O
+victim	O
+,	O
+a	O
+26-year	O
+-	O
+old	O
+male	O
+,	O
+at	O
+the	O
+scene	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+victim	O
+was	O
+then	O
+transported	O
+to	O
+the	O
+hospital	O
+and	O
+pronounced	O
+deceased	O
+.	O
+
+Next	O
+of	O
+kin	O
+notification	O
+has	O
+not	O
+been	O
+made	O
+at	O
+this	O
+time	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+officer	O
+was	O
+not	O
+injured	O
+and	O
+will	O
+be	O
+placed	O
+on	O
+administrative	O
+leave	O
+pending	O
+the	O
+outcome	O
+of	O
+the	O
+investigation	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Dallas	O
+Police	O
+Department	O
+is	O
+conducting	O
+a	O
+joint	O
+investigation	O
+with	O
+the	O
+District	O
+Attorney	O
+’s	O
+Office	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+investigation	O
+is	O
+ongoing	O
+and	O
+we	O
+will	O
+release	O
+additional	O
+details	O
+as	O
+they	O
+become	O
+available	O
+and	O
+it	O
+is	O
+appropriate	O
+to	O
+do	O
+so	O
+.	O
+
+If	O
+an	O
+average	O
+citizen	O
+walked	O
+into	O
+the	O
+wrong	O
+home	O
+and	O
+shot	O
+and	O
+killed	O
+an	O
+innocent	O
+homeowner	O
+,	O
+rest	B-PROP
+assured	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+would	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+jail	I-PROP
+—	I-PROP
+right	I-PROP
+now	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+However	O
+,	O
+instead	O
+of	O
+immediately	O
+arresting	O
+the	O
+officer	O
+for	O
+trespassing	O
+and	O
+murder	O
+,	O
+she	O
+was	O
+simply	O
+placed	O
+on	O
+administrative	O
+leave	O
+—	O
+a	B-PROP
+glaring	I-PROP
+function	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+blue	I-PROP
+privilege	I-PROP
+indeed	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Super	B-PROP
+scary	I-PROP
+because	O
+the	O
+police	O
+are	O
+supposed	O
+to	O
+protect	O
+you	O
+and	O
+then	O
+they	O
+come	O
+home	O
+and	O
+,	O
+you	O
+know	O
+,	O
+you	O
+’re	O
+just	O
+hanging	O
+out	O
+in	O
+your	O
+own	O
+house	O
+and	O
+then	O
+they	O
+come	O
+home	O
+thinking	O
+they	O
+’re	O
+home	O
+or	O
+whatever	O
+.	O
+
+I	O
+do	O
+n’t	O
+know	O
+if	O
+she	O
+was	O
+tired	O
+but	O
+that	B-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+pretty	B-PROP
+scary	I-PROP
+,	O
+”	O
+Richard	O
+Healy	O
+Nelson	O
+,	O
+who	O
+lives	O
+in	O
+the	O
+complex	O
+,	O
+said	O
+to	O
+reporters	O
+.	O
+
+NBC	O
+News	O
+spoke	O
+with	O
+Jean	O
+’s	O
+mother	O
+in	O
+a	O
+phone	O
+interview	O
+from	O
+her	O
+home	O
+in	O
+St.	O
+Lucia	O
+who	O
+was	O
+stunned	O
+to	O
+hear	O
+of	O
+his	O
+death	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+He	O
+did	O
+no	O
+one	O
+any	O
+wrong	O
+,	O
+”	O
+she	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+While	O
+the	O
+Free	O
+Thought	O
+Project	O
+consistently	O
+reports	O
+on	O
+police	O
+officers	O
+entering	O
+the	O
+wrong	O
+home	O
+during	O
+raids	O
+and	O
+killing	O
+,	O
+maiming	O
+,	O
+or	O
+traumatizing	O
+entirely	O
+innocent	O
+people	O
+,	O
+this	O
+is	O
+the	O
+first	O
+time	O
+we	O
+’ve	O
+reported	O
+a	O
+story	O
+of	O
+an	O
+off	O
+-	O
+duty	O
+cop	O
+going	O
+into	O
+the	O
+wrong	O
+home	O
+,	O
+on	O
+their	O
+way	O
+home	O
+,	O
+and	O
+killing	O
+someone	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+details	O
+of	O
+how	O
+or	O
+why	O
+this	O
+officer	O
+would	O
+walk	O
+into	O
+an	O
+apartment	O
+that	O
+was	O
+not	O
+hers	O
+are	O
+unclear	O
+.	O
+
+However	O
+,	O
+what	O
+is	O
+entirely	O
+clear	O
+is	O
+the	O
+fact	O
+that	O
+a	O
+mother	O
+and	O
+father	O
+are	O
+now	O
+and	O
+will	O
+be	O
+grieving	O
+for	O
+the	O
+rest	O
+of	O
+their	O
+lives	O
+because	O
+of	O
+her	O
+actions	O
+.	O
+
+And	O
+,	O
+in	O
+a	O
+slap	O
+to	O
+the	O
+face	O
+of	O
+Jean	O
+’s	O
+parents	O
+,	O
+the	O
+person	O
+who	O
+admitted	O
+to	O
+killing	O
+their	O
+innocent	O
+son	O
+has	O
+yet	O
+to	O
+be	O
+arrested	O
+.	O
+
+Article	O
+posted	O
+with	O
+permission	O
+from	O
+The	O
+Free	O
+Thought	O
+Project	O
+
+Dallas	O
+Police	O
+Officer	O
+Finally	O
+Arrested	O
+After	O
+Entering	O
+Wrong	O
+Apartment	O
+&	O
+Killing	O
+Man	O
+
+Last	O
+week	O
+,	O
+it	O
+was	O
+reported	O
+that	O
+Dallas	O
+Police	O
+Officer	O
+Amber	O
+Guyger	O
+entered	O
+an	O
+apartment	O
+she	O
+claims	O
+that	O
+she	O
+thought	O
+was	O
+hers	O
+and	O
+subsequently	O
+found	O
+the	O
+occupant	O
+of	O
+that	O
+apartment	O
+home	O
+and	O
+shot	O
+and	O
+killed	O
+him	O
+,	O
+claiming	O
+she	O
+thought	O
+he	O
+was	O
+an	O
+intruder	O
+.	O
+
+Now	O
+,	O
+after	O
+several	O
+days	O
+of	O
+outcry	B-PROP
+from	O
+the	O
+community	O
+,	O
+Guyger	O
+has	O
+been	O
+arrested	O
+and	O
+Charged	O
+with	O
+manslaughter	O
+in	O
+the	O
+death	O
+of	O
+26-year	O
+-	O
+old	O
+Botham	O
+Jean	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+a	O
+statement	O
+released	O
+on	O
+Friday	O
+,	O
+Dallas	O
+police	O
+said	O
+their	O
+officer	O
+called	O
+them	O
+after	O
+shooting	O
+Jean	O
+and	O
+told	O
+responding	O
+officers	O
+that	O
+“	O
+she	O
+entered	O
+the	O
+victim	O
+’s	O
+apartment	O
+believing	O
+that	O
+it	O
+was	O
+her	O
+own	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+On	O
+September	O
+6	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+at	O
+about	O
+9:59	O
+p.m.	O
+,	O
+an	O
+off	O
+duty	O
+Dallas	O
+Police	O
+officer	O
+called	O
+police	O
+dispatch	O
+and	O
+said	O
+she	O
+was	O
+involved	O
+in	O
+a	O
+shooting	O
+at	O
+the	O
+apartments	O
+located	O
+at	O
+1210	O
+S.	O
+Lamar	O
+.	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+John	O
+Bolton	O
+Richard	O
+Grenell	O
+Dina	O
+Powell	O
+Heather	O
+Nauert	O
+Ivanka	O
+Trump	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Email	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Freedom	O
+Outpost	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+Preliminary	O
+information	O
+suggests	O
+that	O
+the	O
+officer	O
+arrived	O
+home	O
+in	O
+full	O
+uniform	O
+after	O
+working	O
+a	O
+full	O
+shift	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+officer	O
+reported	O
+to	O
+the	O
+responding	O
+officers	O
+that	O
+she	O
+entered	O
+the	O
+victim	O
+’s	O
+apartment	O
+believing	O
+that	O
+it	O
+was	O
+her	O
+own	O
+.	O
+
+At	O
+some	O
+point	O
+,	O
+the	O
+officer	O
+fired	O
+her	O
+weapon	O
+striking	O
+the	O
+victim	O
+.	O
+
+Responding	O
+officers	O
+administered	O
+aid	O
+to	O
+the	O
+victim	O
+,	O
+a	O
+26-year	O
+-	O
+old	O
+male	O
+,	O
+at	O
+the	O
+scene	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+victim	O
+was	O
+then	O
+transported	O
+to	O
+the	O
+hospital	O
+and	O
+pronounced	O
+deceased	O
+.	O
+
+Next	O
+of	O
+kin	O
+notification	O
+has	O
+not	O
+been	O
+made	O
+at	O
+this	O
+time	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+officer	O
+was	O
+not	O
+injured	O
+and	O
+will	O
+be	O
+placed	O
+on	O
+administrative	O
+leave	O
+pending	O
+the	O
+outcome	O
+of	O
+the	O
+investigation	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Dallas	O
+Police	O
+Department	O
+is	O
+conducting	O
+a	O
+joint	O
+investigation	O
+with	O
+the	O
+District	O
+Attorney	O
+’s	O
+Office	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+investigation	O
+is	O
+ongoing	O
+and	O
+we	O
+will	O
+release	O
+additional	O
+details	O
+as	O
+they	O
+become	O
+available	O
+and	O
+it	O
+is	O
+appropriate	O
+to	O
+do	O
+so	O
+.	O
+
+I	O
+have	O
+no	O
+idea	O
+how	O
+you	O
+can	O
+enter	O
+an	O
+apartment	O
+mistakenly	O
+.	O
+
+Does	B-PROP
+Guyger	I-PROP
+leave	I-PROP
+her	I-PROP
+door	O
+unlocked	O
+?	O
+
+Furthermore	O
+,	O
+The	O
+Dallas	O
+News	O
+reports	O
+:	O
+
+Jean	O
+,	O
+who	O
+lived	O
+on	O
+the	O
+fourth	O
+floor	O
+of	O
+the	O
+South	O
+Side	O
+Flats	O
+in	O
+the	O
+Cedars	O
+,	O
+was	O
+home	O
+alone	O
+when	O
+Guyger	O
+mistook	O
+his	O
+apartment	O
+for	O
+hers	O
+,	O
+the	O
+affidavit	O
+says	O
+.	O
+
+Guyger	O
+lived	O
+on	O
+the	O
+third	O
+floor	O
+,	O
+directly	O
+beneath	O
+his	O
+apartment	O
+,	O
+and	O
+mistakenly	O
+parked	O
+on	O
+the	O
+fourth	O
+floor	O
+after	O
+finishing	O
+a	O
+shift	O
+at	O
+the	O
+Dallas	O
+Police	O
+Department	O
+,	O
+the	O
+affidavit	O
+says	O
+.	O
+
+When	O
+she	O
+arrived	O
+at	O
+Jean	O
+'s	O
+door	O
+,	O
+Guyger	O
+entered	O
+a	O
+unique	O
+door	O
+key	O
+with	O
+an	O
+electronic	O
+chip	O
+into	O
+the	O
+keyhole	O
+,	O
+the	O
+affidavit	O
+says	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+door	O
+was	O
+already	O
+ajar	O
+,	O
+so	O
+the	O
+force	O
+of	O
+pushing	O
+the	O
+key	O
+inside	O
+opened	O
+the	O
+door	O
+,	O
+according	O
+to	O
+the	O
+affidavit	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+affidavit	O
+says	O
+the	O
+apartments	O
+'	O
+"	O
+respective	O
+interior	O
+floorplans	O
+are	O
+in	O
+most	O
+ways	O
+identical	O
+or	O
+extremely	O
+similar	O
+.	O
+"	O
+
+The	O
+apartment	O
+was	O
+dark	O
+and	O
+when	O
+she	O
+saw	O
+"	O
+a	O
+large	O
+silhouette	O
+,	O
+"	O
+Guyger	O
+thought	O
+she	O
+was	O
+being	O
+burglarized	O
+,	O
+the	O
+affidavit	O
+says	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+affidavit	O
+says	O
+Guyger	O
+drew	O
+her	O
+gun	O
+,	O
+"	O
+gave	O
+verbal	O
+commands	O
+that	O
+were	O
+ignored	O
+"	O
+and	O
+fired	O
+twice	O
+.	O
+
+Jean	O
+was	O
+struck	O
+once	O
+in	O
+the	O
+torso	O
+.	O
+
+Guyger	O
+then	O
+called	O
+911	O
+from	O
+her	O
+cellphone	O
+and	O
+started	O
+performing	O
+first	O
+aid	O
+.	O
+
+She	O
+turned	O
+on	O
+the	O
+lights	O
+,	O
+then	O
+went	O
+to	O
+the	O
+front	O
+door	O
+again	O
+and	O
+realized	O
+the	O
+apartment	O
+was	O
+n't	O
+hers	O
+,	O
+the	O
+affidavit	O
+says	O
+.	O
+
+She	O
+told	O
+the	O
+911	O
+operator	O
+as	O
+well	O
+as	O
+responding	O
+officers	O
+that	O
+she	O
+thought	O
+she	O
+was	O
+at	O
+her	O
+apartment	O
+when	O
+she	O
+shot	O
+Jean	O
+,	O
+according	O
+to	O
+the	O
+affidavit	O
+.	O
+
+Ok	O
+,	O
+some	O
+of	O
+this	O
+seems	O
+plausible	O
+,	O
+but	O
+I	O
+still	O
+am	O
+left	O
+wondering	O
+about	O
+the	O
+door	O
+being	O
+ajar	O
+.	O
+
+Is	O
+this	O
+something	O
+people	O
+are	O
+prone	O
+to	O
+do	O
+at	O
+1o	O
+o'clock	O
+at	O
+night	O
+in	O
+Dallas	O
+?	O
+
+In	O
+any	O
+case	O
+,	O
+we	O
+all	O
+know	O
+that	O
+any	O
+of	O
+us	O
+who	O
+did	O
+the	O
+same	O
+thing	O
+would	O
+have	O
+immediately	O
+been	O
+taken	O
+into	O
+custody	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+was	O
+not	O
+the	O
+case	O
+with	O
+Guyger	O
+,	O
+though	O
+one	O
+officer	O
+close	O
+to	O
+her	O
+said	O
+,	O
+"	O
+she	O
+is	O
+devastated	O
+.	O
+"	O
+
+Knowing	O
+this	O
+provoked	O
+outrage	O
+across	O
+the	O
+nation	O
+over	O
+the	O
+weekend	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+fact	O
+,	O
+this	O
+is	O
+not	O
+her	O
+first	O
+shooting	O
+.	O
+
+As	O
+a	O
+four	O
+-	O
+year	O
+veteran	O
+of	O
+the	O
+force	O
+,	O
+she	O
+was	O
+also	O
+involved	O
+in	O
+the	O
+shooting	O
+of	O
+another	O
+suspect	O
+in	O
+2017	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Dallas	O
+News	O
+reported	O
+:	O
+
+In	O
+2017	O
+,	O
+Guyger	O
+shot	O
+47-year	O
+-	O
+old	O
+Uvaldo	O
+Perez	O
+,	O
+who	O
+had	O
+wrestled	O
+a	O
+Taser	O
+away	O
+from	O
+her	O
+.	O
+
+Another	O
+officer	O
+had	O
+been	O
+in	O
+a	O
+Pleasant	O
+Grove	O
+neighborhood	O
+looking	O
+for	O
+a	O
+woman	O
+who	O
+had	O
+a	O
+warrant	O
+out	O
+for	O
+her	O
+arrest	O
+.	O
+
+When	O
+the	O
+officer	O
+thought	O
+he	O
+saw	O
+the	O
+woman	O
+in	O
+a	O
+car	O
+with	O
+two	O
+men	O
+in	O
+the	O
+8300	O
+block	O
+of	O
+Reva	O
+Street	O
+,	O
+the	O
+officer	O
+asked	O
+for	O
+backup	O
+from	O
+Guyger	O
+and	O
+another	O
+officer	O
+,	O
+according	O
+to	O
+an	O
+affidavit	O
+.	O
+
+One	O
+of	O
+the	O
+officers	O
+was	O
+trying	O
+to	O
+search	O
+Perez	O
+when	O
+he	O
+became	O
+combative	O
+,	O
+the	O
+affidavit	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+Guyger	O
+deployed	O
+her	O
+Taser	O
+before	O
+Perez	O
+was	O
+able	O
+to	O
+take	O
+it	O
+from	O
+her	O
+.	O
+
+After	O
+Perez	O
+had	O
+the	O
+Taser	O
+,	O
+Guyger	O
+fired	O
+her	O
+gun	O
+once	O
+,	O
+striking	O
+him	O
+in	O
+the	O
+abdomen	O
+,	O
+the	O
+affidavit	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+Neither	O
+Guyger	O
+nor	O
+the	O
+other	O
+officers	O
+were	O
+injured	O
+in	O
+the	O
+2017	O
+shooting	O
+.	O
+
+Police	O
+arrested	O
+Perez	O
+on	O
+a	O
+charge	O
+of	O
+taking	O
+a	O
+weapon	O
+from	O
+an	O
+officer	O
+,	O
+as	O
+well	O
+as	O
+charges	O
+for	O
+possession	O
+of	O
+methamphetamine	O
+,	O
+marijuana	O
+and	O
+violating	O
+his	O
+parole	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+February	O
+2018	O
+,	O
+Perez	O
+signed	O
+a	O
+plea	O
+agreement	O
+for	O
+the	O
+charge	O
+of	O
+taking	O
+an	O
+officer	O
+'s	O
+weapon	O
+and	O
+was	O
+sentenced	O
+to	O
+two	O
+years	O
+in	O
+prison	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Texas	O
+Rangers	O
+are	O
+also	O
+involved	O
+in	O
+the	O
+investigation	O
+.	O
+
+USA	O
+Today	O
+reports	O
+that	O
+Guyger	O
+was	O
+freed	O
+on	O
+bail	O
+on	O
+Sunday	O
+after	O
+being	O
+charged	O
+with	O
+manslaughter	O
+,	O
+and	O
+faces	O
+two	O
+20-year	O
+sentences	O
+and	O
+up	O
+to	O
+a	O
+$	O
+10,000	O
+fine	O
+.	O
+
+A	O
+charge	O
+of	O
+murder	O
+may	O
+be	O
+forthcoming	O
+once	O
+the	O
+case	O
+is	O
+taken	O
+to	O
+a	O
+grand	O
+jury	O
+,	O
+according	O
+to	O
+Dallas	O
+County	O
+District	O
+Attorney	O
+Faith	O
+Johnson	O
+.	O
+
+Dallas	O
+Police	O
+Attempt	O
+to	B-PROP
+‘	I-PROP
+Smear	I-PROP
+’	O
+Botham	O
+Jean	O
+Over	O
+Tiny	O
+Bit	O
+of	O
+Weed	O
+and	O
+they	O
+Failed	O
+,	O
+Miserably	B-PROP
+
+Dallas	O
+,	O
+TX	O
+—	O
+The	O
+Dallas	O
+Police	O
+on	O
+Thursday	O
+announced	O
+the	O
+findings	O
+of	O
+a	O
+search	O
+warrant	O
+they	O
+executed	O
+on	O
+the	O
+home	O
+of	O
+Botham	O
+Jean	O
+after	O
+he	O
+was	O
+gunned	O
+down	O
+in	O
+his	O
+apartment	O
+by	O
+one	O
+of	O
+their	O
+own	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+department	O
+is	O
+now	O
+accused	O
+of	O
+trying	O
+to	O
+“	O
+smear	B-PROP
+”	O
+Jean	O
+by	O
+claiming	O
+they	O
+found	O
+a	O
+tiny	O
+bit	O
+of	O
+marijuana	O
+in	O
+his	O
+house	O
+—	O
+as	B-PROP
+if	I-PROP
+this	I-PROP
+justifies	I-PROP
+going	I-PROP
+into	I-PROP
+someone	I-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+home	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+murdering	I-PROP
+them	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+The	B-PROP
+timing	I-PROP
+could	I-PROP
+n’t	I-PROP
+have	I-PROP
+been	I-PROP
+more	I-PROP
+insidiously	I-PROP
+planned	I-PROP
+as	O
+police	O
+released	O
+the	O
+affidavit	O
+on	O
+the	O
+day	O
+of	O
+Jean	O
+’s	O
+funeral	O
+—	O
+despite	O
+having	O
+allegedly	O
+found	O
+the	O
+marijuana	O
+last	O
+week	O
+.	O
+
+According	O
+to	O
+the	O
+affidavit	O
+,	O
+when	O
+they	O
+searched	O
+his	O
+home	O
+,	O
+police	O
+claimed	O
+to	O
+have	O
+found	O
+10.4	O
+grams	O
+of	O
+pot	O
+—	O
+less	O
+than	O
+half	O
+an	O
+ounce	O
+.	O
+
+Police	O
+also	O
+said	O
+they	O
+found	O
+two	O
+fired	O
+cartridge	O
+casings	O
+,	O
+a	O
+police	O
+backpack	O
+and	O
+vest	O
+,	O
+and	O
+a	O
+metal	O
+marijuana	O
+grinder	O
+—	O
+the	B-PROP
+horror	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Even	O
+if	O
+police	O
+did	O
+find	O
+marijuana	O
+,	O
+why	B-PROP
+on	I-PROP
+earth	I-PROP
+would	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+execute	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+search	I-PROP
+warrant	I-PROP
+on	I-PROP
+an	I-PROP
+innocent	I-PROP
+dead	I-PROP
+man	I-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+home	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+then	I-PROP
+release	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+information	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+public	I-PROP
+?	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+John	O
+Bolton	O
+Richard	O
+Grenell	O
+Dina	O
+Powell	O
+Heather	O
+Nauert	O
+Ivanka	O
+Trump	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Phone	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Freedom	O
+Outpost	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+They	O
+[	O
+police	O
+]	O
+immediately	O
+began	O
+looking	O
+to	B-PROP
+smear	I-PROP
+him	I-PROP
+,	O
+”	O
+attorney	O
+Lee	O
+Merritt	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+I	O
+think	O
+it	O
+’s	O
+unfortunate	O
+that	O
+law	O
+enforcement	O
+begin	O
+to	O
+immediately	O
+criminalize	O
+the	O
+victim	O
+—	O
+in	O
+this	O
+case	O
+,	O
+someone	O
+who	O
+was	O
+clearly	O
+was	O
+the	O
+victim	O
+that	O
+has	O
+absolutely	O
+no	O
+bearing	O
+on	O
+the	O
+fact	O
+that	O
+he	O
+was	O
+shot	O
+in	O
+his	O
+home	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Merritt	O
+added	O
+to	O
+Fox	O
+4	O
+.	O
+
+Pointing	O
+out	O
+the	O
+glaring	B-PROP
+nature	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+smear	B-PROP
+campaign	I-PROP
+was	O
+the	O
+fact	O
+that	O
+there	O
+has	O
+been	O
+absolutely	B-PROP
+zero	I-PROP
+information	I-PROP
+released	O
+about	O
+the	O
+warrants	O
+conducted	O
+on	O
+officer	O
+Amber	O
+Guyger	O
+,	O
+the	O
+killer	B-PROP
+cop	I-PROP
+who	O
+lived	O
+just	O
+below	O
+Jean	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+I	O
+would	O
+love	O
+to	O
+see	O
+more	O
+information	O
+coming	O
+out	O
+about	O
+the	O
+warrants	O
+executed	O
+on	O
+the	O
+home	O
+of	O
+the	O
+shooter	O
+who	O
+lived	O
+just	O
+below	O
+him	O
+.	O
+
+I	O
+have	O
+n’t	O
+seen	O
+any	O
+of	O
+those	O
+,	O
+”	O
+said	O
+Merritt	O
+.	O
+
+Merritt	O
+accused	O
+the	O
+department	O
+of	O
+conducting	O
+a	O
+“	O
+common	O
+assassination	O
+attempt	O
+on	O
+the	O
+victim	O
+that	O
+we	O
+often	O
+see	O
+in	O
+law	O
+enforcement	O
+involved	O
+shootings	O
+.	O
+”	O
+Sadly	O
+,	O
+he	O
+appears	O
+to	O
+be	O
+correct	O
+in	O
+his	O
+accusations	O
+.	O
+
+It	O
+is	O
+standard	O
+procedure	O
+for	O
+police	O
+to	O
+dig	O
+up	O
+dirt	O
+on	O
+their	O
+victims	O
+in	O
+attempts	O
+to	O
+smear	B-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+assassinate	I-PROP
+their	I-PROP
+character	I-PROP
+to	B-PROP
+make	I-PROP
+the	B-PROP
+killer	I-PROP
+cops	I-PROP
+look	I-PROP
+good	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+public	I-PROP
+eye	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Even	B-PROP
+sadder	I-PROP
+,	O
+however	O
+,	O
+is	O
+the	O
+fact	O
+that	O
+these	O
+smear	B-PROP
+campaigns	I-PROP
+work	O
+most	O
+of	O
+the	O
+time	O
+.	O
+
+As	O
+the	O
+Free	O
+Thought	O
+Project	O
+reported	O
+on	O
+Wednesday	O
+,	O
+according	O
+to	O
+police	O
+—	O
+who	O
+continue	O
+to	O
+attempt	O
+to	O
+spin	O
+this	O
+story	O
+into	O
+some	O
+tragic	B-PROP
+mistake	O
+—	O
+Guyger	O
+accidentally	O
+went	O
+into	O
+the	O
+wrong	O
+apartment	O
+,	O
+mistook	O
+Jean	O
+for	O
+an	O
+intruder	O
+and	O
+killed	O
+him	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Guyger	O
+entered	O
+the	O
+building	O
+and	O
+walked	O
+down	O
+the	O
+fourth	O
+-	O
+floor	O
+hallway	O
+to	O
+what	O
+she	O
+thought	O
+was	O
+her	O
+apartment	O
+,	O
+”	O
+according	O
+to	O
+the	O
+arrest	O
+warrant	O
+made	O
+public	O
+Monday	O
+afternoon	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+She	O
+inserted	O
+a	O
+unique	O
+door	O
+key	O
+,	O
+with	O
+an	O
+electronic	O
+chip	O
+,	O
+into	O
+the	O
+door	O
+keyhole	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+door	O
+,	O
+which	O
+was	O
+slightly	O
+ajar	O
+prior	O
+to	O
+Guyger	O
+’s	O
+arrival	O
+,	O
+fully	O
+opened	O
+under	O
+the	O
+force	O
+of	O
+the	O
+key	O
+insertion	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+“	O
+Guyger	O
+drew	O
+her	O
+firearm	O
+,	O
+gave	O
+verbal	O
+commands	O
+that	O
+were	O
+ignored	O
+by	O
+…	O
+Jean	O
+,	O
+”	O
+according	O
+to	O
+the	O
+warrant	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Guyger	O
+fired	O
+her	O
+handgun	O
+two	O
+times	O
+striking	O
+[	O
+Jean	O
+]	O
+in	O
+the	O
+torso	O
+.	O
+
+Guyger	O
+entered	O
+the	O
+apartment	O
+,	O
+immediately	O
+called	O
+911	O
+,	O
+requesting	O
+police	O
+and	O
+EMS	O
+,	O
+and	O
+provided	O
+first	O
+aid	O
+to	O
+…	O
+Jean	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Due	O
+to	O
+the	O
+interior	O
+darkness	O
+of	O
+the	O
+apartment	O
+,	O
+Guyger	O
+turned	O
+on	O
+the	O
+interior	O
+lights	O
+while	O
+on	O
+the	O
+phone	O
+with	O
+911	O
+.	O
+
+Upon	O
+being	O
+asked	O
+where	O
+she	O
+was	O
+located	O
+by	O
+emergency	O
+dispatchers	O
+,	O
+Guyger	O
+returned	O
+to	O
+the	O
+front	O
+door	O
+to	O
+observe	O
+the	O
+address	O
+and	O
+discovered	O
+she	O
+was	O
+at	O
+the	O
+wrong	O
+apartment	O
+,	O
+”	O
+according	O
+to	O
+the	O
+arrest	O
+warrant	O
+.	O
+
+At	O
+no	O
+time	O
+,	O
+according	O
+to	O
+the	O
+warrant	O
+,	O
+does	O
+Guyger	O
+say	O
+what	O
+“	O
+verbal	O
+commands	O
+”	O
+she	O
+gave	O
+.	O
+
+What	O
+’s	O
+more	O
+,	O
+any	O
+verbal	O
+commands	O
+she	O
+did	O
+give	O
+were	O
+entirely	B-PROP
+irrelevant	I-PROP
+as	O
+she	O
+was	O
+the	B-PROP
+intruder	I-PROP
+—	I-PROP
+not	I-PROP
+Jean	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Attempting	O
+to	O
+imply	O
+that	O
+Jean	O
+was	O
+somehow	O
+at	O
+fault	O
+for	O
+his	O
+own	O
+death	O
+for	O
+disobeying	O
+the	O
+commands	O
+of	O
+a	B-PROP
+homicidal	I-PROP
+cop	I-PROP
+who	I-PROP
+’d	I-PROP
+just	I-PROP
+illegally	I-PROP
+broken	I-PROP
+into	I-PROP
+his	I-PROP
+home	I-PROP
+is	O
+as	O
+irresponsible	O
+as	O
+it	O
+is	O
+reprehensible	O
+.	O
+
+What	O
+’s	O
+more	O
+,	O
+according	O
+to	O
+the	O
+attorneys	O
+for	O
+Jean	O
+,	O
+when	O
+Guyger	O
+was	O
+on	O
+the	O
+phone	O
+with	O
+police	O
+,	O
+she	O
+had	O
+to	O
+go	O
+outside	O
+to	O
+verify	O
+the	O
+address	O
+of	O
+the	O
+apartment	O
+—	O
+implying	O
+that	O
+she	O
+knew	O
+she	O
+was	O
+in	O
+the	O
+wrong	O
+apartment	O
+from	O
+the	O
+start	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+From	O
+the	O
+fact	O
+that	O
+when	O
+you	O
+look	O
+at	O
+an	O
+affidavit	O
+and	O
+I	O
+’m	O
+thinking	O
+that	O
+I	O
+’m	O
+at	O
+my	O
+house	O
+and	O
+I	O
+call	O
+911	O
+because	O
+someone	O
+was	O
+just	O
+shot	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Attorney	O
+Daryl	O
+Washington	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Well	O
+,	O
+the	O
+very	O
+first	O
+thing	O
+that	O
+I	O
+’m	O
+going	O
+to	O
+do	O
+is	O
+I	O
+’m	O
+not	O
+going	O
+to	O
+go	O
+outside	O
+and	O
+look	O
+at	O
+my	O
+address	O
+?	O
+
+I	O
+’m	O
+going	O
+to	O
+give	O
+them	O
+my	O
+address	O
+right	O
+there	O
+on	O
+the	O
+phone	O
+.	O
+
+I	O
+’m	O
+going	O
+to	O
+say	O
+I	O
+’m	O
+on	O
+the	O
+phone	O
+.	O
+
+My	O
+address	O
+is	O
+this	O
+.	O
+
+Why	O
+did	O
+she	O
+have	O
+to	O
+go	O
+outside	O
+to	O
+verify	O
+the	O
+address	O
+?	O
+
+It	B-PROP
+makes	I-PROP
+no	I-PROP
+sense	I-PROP
+whatsoever	I-PROP
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Even	O
+more	B-PROP
+ominous	I-PROP
+than	O
+having	O
+to	O
+verify	O
+the	O
+address	O
+is	O
+the	O
+fact	O
+that	O
+according	O
+to	O
+witnesses	O
+,	O
+Guyger	O
+’s	O
+story	O
+of	O
+inserting	O
+the	O
+key	O
+into	O
+Jean	O
+’s	O
+door	O
+and	O
+it	O
+opening	O
+up	O
+was	O
+simply	O
+not	O
+true	O
+.	O
+
+According	O
+to	O
+witnesses	O
+,	O
+Guyger	O
+was	O
+banging	O
+on	O
+Jean	O
+’s	O
+door	O
+,	O
+demanding	O
+he	O
+let	O
+her	O
+in	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Independent	O
+witnesses	O
+have	O
+already	O
+come	O
+forward	O
+to	O
+say	O
+that	O
+they	O
+heard	O
+this	O
+officer	O
+pounding	O
+on	O
+the	O
+door	O
+and	O
+demanding	O
+to	O
+be	O
+let	O
+in	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Lee	O
+Merritt	O
+,	O
+one	O
+of	O
+the	O
+attorneys	O
+representing	O
+the	O
+Jean	O
+family	O
+,	O
+told	O
+ABC	O
+News	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+The	O
+contradictions	O
+begin	O
+to	O
+build	O
+from	O
+there	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+The	O
+doors	O
+in	O
+the	O
+complex	O
+are	O
+also	O
+equipped	O
+with	O
+an	O
+automatic	O
+closing	O
+mechanism	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+was	O
+demonstrated	O
+by	O
+the	O
+attorneys	O
+who	O
+opened	O
+the	O
+door	O
+and	O
+released	O
+it	O
+several	O
+times	O
+—	O
+showing	O
+that	O
+it	O
+closed	O
+every	O
+single	O
+time	O
+—	O
+blowing	B-PROP
+the	O
+claim	O
+that	O
+the	O
+door	O
+was	O
+somehow	O
+ajar	B-PROP
+completely	I-PROP
+out	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+water	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Jean	O
+’s	O
+family	O
+also	O
+pointed	O
+out	O
+that	O
+it	O
+would	O
+have	O
+been	O
+incredibly	B-PROP
+unlikely	I-PROP
+for	O
+Guyger	O
+to	O
+mistake	O
+Jean	O
+’s	O
+apartment	O
+for	O
+her	O
+own	O
+as	O
+he	O
+had	O
+a	O
+distinct	O
+red	O
+door	O
+mat	O
+which	O
+would	O
+have	O
+been	O
+enough	O
+for	O
+the	O
+cop	O
+to	O
+know	O
+she	O
+was	O
+at	O
+the	O
+wrong	O
+place	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+hallway	O
+outside	O
+the	O
+apartment	O
+where	O
+Botham	O
+Jean	O
+was	O
+shot	O
+and	O
+killed	O
+by	O
+a	O
+Dallas	O
+Police	O
+officer	O
+.	O
+
+pic.twitter.com/2xN9xqppRC	O
+—	O
+Allison	O
+Harris	O
+(	O
+@AllisonFox4News	O
+)	O
+September	O
+8	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+Even	O
+as	O
+cops	O
+come	O
+to	O
+Guyger	O
+’s	O
+defense	O
+and	O
+attempt	O
+to	O
+shame	O
+,	O
+smear	O
+,	O
+and	O
+discredit	O
+her	O
+victim	O
+—	O
+who	O
+was	O
+an	B-PROP
+upstanding	I-PROP
+member	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+society	I-PROP
+regardless	O
+of	O
+the	O
+plant	O
+they	O
+claim	O
+to	O
+have	O
+found	O
+—	O
+they	O
+are	O
+failing	B-PROP
+miserably	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Despite	O
+cops	O
+rallying	O
+behind	O
+the	O
+blue	O
+line	O
+to	O
+defend	O
+this	O
+killer	B-PROP
+cop	I-PROP
+,	O
+the	O
+rest	O
+of	O
+the	O
+country	O
+is	O
+not	O
+buying	O
+it	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+a	O
+damning	B-PROP
+tweet	O
+,	O
+writer	O
+Kashana	O
+Cauley	O
+summed	O
+up	O
+the	O
+nature	O
+of	O
+the	O
+smear	B-PROP
+campaign	I-PROP
+quite	O
+succinctly	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+response	O
+to	O
+cops	O
+claiming	O
+to	O
+find	O
+a	O
+tiny	O
+bit	O
+of	O
+weed	O
+,	O
+she	O
+pointed	O
+out	O
+that	O
+there	O
+was	O
+also	O
+a	B-PROP
+homicidal	I-PROP
+cop	I-PROP
+inside	O
+too	O
+.	O
+
+His	O
+apartment	O
+also	O
+contained	O
+an	O
+off	O
+duty	O
+homicidal	B-PROP
+cop	O
+.	O
+
+https://t.co/Nq5wDpmukq	O
+—	O
+Kashana	O
+(	O
+@kashanacauley	O
+)	O
+September	O
+13	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+Article	O
+posted	O
+with	O
+permission	O
+from	O
+The	O
+Free	O
+Thought	O
+Project	O
+
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+Jihadis	O
+’	O
+Defense	O
+Attorney	O
+:	O
+“	O
+If	B-PROP
+These	I-PROP
+Were	I-PROP
+White	I-PROP
+Christians	I-PROP
+…	I-PROP
+No	I-PROP
+One	I-PROP
+Would	I-PROP
+Bat	I-PROP
+An	I-PROP
+Eye	I-PROP
+”	O
+
+Editor	O
+'s	O
+Note	O
+:	O
+If	O
+they	O
+were	O
+white	O
+,	O
+devout	O
+Christians	O
+,	O
+we	O
+would	O
+n't	O
+hear	O
+about	O
+this	O
+cause	O
+it	O
+would	O
+have	O
+never	O
+taken	O
+place	O
+because	O
+it	O
+would	O
+have	O
+gone	O
+against	O
+the	O
+teachings	O
+of	O
+Christ	O
+and	O
+there	O
+would	O
+have	O
+been	O
+an	O
+outcry	O
+by	O
+Christians	O
+everywhere	O
+against	O
+people	O
+might	O
+engage	O
+in	O
+such	O
+behavior	O
+and	O
+would	O
+claim	O
+such	O
+things	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+Federal	O
+prosecutors	O
+say	O
+that	O
+between	O
+Dec.	O
+2017	O
+and	O
+August	O
+2018	O
+,	O
+the	O
+group	O
+,	O
+who	O
+are	O
+either	O
+siblings	O
+or	O
+related	O
+by	O
+marriage	O
+,	O
+had	O
+‘	O
+a	O
+common	O
+plan	O
+to	O
+prepare	O
+for	O
+violent	O
+attacks	O
+on	O
+government	O
+,	O
+military	O
+,	O
+educational	O
+and	O
+financial	O
+institutions	O
+.	O
+
+'	O
+"	O
+
+Yeah	O
+,	O
+if	O
+they	O
+were	O
+white	O
+Christians	O
+,	O
+no	O
+one	O
+would	O
+care	O
+about	O
+that	O
+.	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+John	O
+Bolton	O
+Richard	O
+Grenell	O
+Dina	O
+Powell	O
+Heather	O
+Nauert	O
+Ivanka	O
+Trump	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Name	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Freedom	O
+Outpost	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Federal	O
+Judge	O
+Denies	O
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+Compound	O
+Residents	O
+Bail	O
+,	O
+”	O
+by	O
+Vanessa	O
+Romo	O
+,	O
+KRWG	O
+,	O
+September	O
+13	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+:	O
+
+A	O
+federal	O
+judge	O
+denied	O
+bail	O
+on	O
+Wednesday	O
+to	O
+all	O
+five	O
+members	O
+of	O
+an	O
+extended	O
+family	O
+accused	O
+of	O
+operating	O
+a	O
+training	O
+camp	O
+for	O
+a	O
+violent	B-PROP
+attack	O
+on	O
+public	O
+institutions	O
+out	O
+of	O
+their	O
+isolated	O
+New	O
+Mexico	O
+compound	O
+.	O
+
+During	O
+the	O
+arraignment	O
+hearing	O
+,	O
+Magistrate	O
+Judge	O
+Kirtan	O
+Khalsa	O
+told	O
+the	O
+defendants	O
+there	O
+was	O
+“	O
+clear	B-PROP
+and	O
+convincing	O
+evidence	O
+that	O
+you	B-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+danger	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+community	I-PROP
+,	O
+”	O
+The	O
+Associated	O
+Press	O
+reported	O
+.	O
+
+A	O
+federal	O
+grand	O
+jury	O
+indicted	O
+the	O
+group	O
+on	O
+Tuesday	O
+on	O
+conspiracy	O
+and	O
+federal	O
+firearms	O
+charges	O
+stemming	O
+from	O
+the	O
+discovery	O
+of	O
+a	O
+cache	O
+of	O
+weapons	O
+after	O
+law	O
+enforcement	O
+raided	O
+their	O
+home	O
+in	O
+search	O
+of	O
+a	O
+missing	O
+boy	O
+but	O
+,	O
+instead	O
+,	O
+found	O
+11	O
+malnourished	B-PROP
+children	O
+living	O
+in	O
+squalid	B-PROP
+conditions	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Federal	O
+prosecutors	O
+say	O
+that	O
+between	O
+Dec.	O
+2017	O
+and	O
+August	O
+2018	O
+,	O
+the	O
+group	O
+,	O
+who	O
+are	O
+either	O
+siblings	O
+or	O
+related	O
+by	O
+marriage	O
+,	O
+had	O
+“	O
+a	O
+common	O
+plan	O
+to	O
+prepare	O
+for	O
+violent	O
+attacks	O
+on	O
+government	O
+,	O
+military	O
+,	O
+educational	O
+and	O
+financial	O
+institutions	O
+.	O
+”	O
+U.S.	O
+Attorney	O
+John	O
+C.	O
+Anderson	O
+and	O
+Special	O
+Agent	O
+in	O
+Charge	O
+James	O
+C.	O
+Langenberg	O
+of	O
+the	O
+FBI	O
+’s	O
+Albuquerque	O
+Division	O
+,	O
+said	O
+in	O
+a	O
+statement	O
+that	O
+the	O
+defendants	O
+’	O
+home	O
+in	O
+Amalia	O
+,	O
+N.M.	O
+,	O
+served	O
+as	O
+a	O
+firing	O
+range	O
+and	O
+training	O
+camp	O
+to	O
+carry	O
+out	O
+an	O
+attack	O
+as	O
+part	O
+of	O
+a	O
+religious	O
+prophecy	O
+.	O
+
+According	O
+to	O
+the	O
+indictment	O
+,	O
+some	O
+of	O
+the	O
+minors	O
+were	O
+being	O
+prepared	O
+“	O
+to	B-PROP
+engage	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+jihad	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+…	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+die	I-PROP
+as	I-PROP
+martyrs	I-PROP
+.	O
+”	O
+…	O
+Siraj	O
+Ibn	O
+Wahhaj	O
+’s	O
+lawyer	O
+in	O
+the	O
+state	O
+case	O
+,	O
+suggested	O
+that	O
+those	O
+charges	O
+were	O
+motivated	O
+by	O
+a	O
+degree	O
+of	O
+racial	O
+and	O
+religious	O
+prejudice	O
+against	O
+his	O
+Muslim	O
+client	O
+.	O
+
+If	O
+the	O
+suspects	O
+were	O
+white	O
+Christians	O
+shooting	O
+guns	O
+on	O
+their	O
+property	O
+and	O
+practicing	O
+their	O
+religion	O
+,	O
+“	O
+No	O
+one	O
+would	O
+bat	O
+an	O
+eye	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Thomas	O
+Clark	O
+argued	O
+in	O
+court	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+If	O
+these	O
+were	O
+white	O
+people	O
+of	O
+a	O
+Christian	O
+faith	O
+who	O
+owned	O
+guns	O
+,	O
+that	O
+’s	O
+not	O
+a	O
+big	O
+deal	O
+because	O
+there	B-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+Second	I-PROP
+Amendment	I-PROP
+right	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+own	I-PROP
+firearms	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+this	I-PROP
+country	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+If	O
+these	O
+were	O
+white	O
+Christians	O
+,	O
+faith	O
+healing	O
+is	O
+of	O
+no	O
+consequence	O
+because	O
+we	O
+have	O
+freedom	O
+of	O
+religion	O
+in	O
+this	O
+country	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+they	O
+look	O
+different	O
+and	O
+they	O
+worship	O
+differently	O
+from	O
+the	O
+rest	O
+of	O
+us	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Clark	O
+said	O
+…	O
+.	O
+
+Last	O
+month	O
+,	O
+two	O
+state	O
+judges	O
+were	O
+forced	O
+to	O
+dismiss	O
+child	O
+neglect	O
+charges	O
+against	O
+all	O
+five	O
+adults	O
+when	O
+the	O
+local	O
+district	O
+attorney	O
+’s	O
+office	O
+missed	O
+a	O
+10-day	O
+deadline	O
+to	O
+present	O
+initial	O
+evidence	O
+of	O
+crime	O
+.	O
+
+A	O
+few	O
+days	O
+later	O
+,	O
+Taos	O
+-	O
+based	O
+District	O
+Attorney	O
+Donald	O
+Gallegos	O
+dropped	O
+charges	O
+related	O
+to	O
+the	O
+death	O
+of	O
+Siraj	O
+Wahhaj	O
+’s	O
+son	O
+,	O
+“	O
+saying	O
+he	O
+was	O
+seeking	O
+more	O
+time	O
+to	O
+assemble	O
+and	O
+analyze	O
+evidence	O
+,	O
+and	O
+that	O
+he	O
+intended	O
+to	O
+seek	O
+grand	O
+jury	O
+indictment	O
+,	O
+”	O
+The	O
+Durango	O
+Herald	O
+reported	O
+.	O
+
+Article	O
+posted	O
+with	O
+permission	O
+from	O
+Robert	O
+Spencer	O
+
+Warrants	O
+Show	O
+Police	O
+Never	O
+Searched	O
+Amber	O
+Guyger	O
+’s	O
+Apartment	O
+,	O
+Now	O
+It	O
+’s	O
+Too	O
+Late	O
+,	O
+She	O
+’s	O
+‘	O
+Vacated	O
+’	O
+It	O
+
+Dallas	O
+,	O
+TX	O
+—	O
+On	O
+Sunday	O
+,	O
+activists	O
+rallied	O
+around	O
+the	O
+Dallas	O
+Cowboy	O
+’s	O
+stadium	O
+to	O
+draw	O
+attention	O
+to	O
+the	O
+slaying	O
+of	O
+Botham	O
+Jean	O
+.	O
+
+They	O
+carried	O
+coffins	O
+and	O
+blocked	O
+traffic	O
+to	O
+expose	O
+the	O
+special	O
+treatment	O
+of	O
+Amber	O
+Guyger	O
+,	O
+the	O
+cop	O
+who	O
+has	O
+yet	O
+to	O
+even	O
+be	O
+fired	O
+for	O
+killing	O
+Jean	O
+.	O
+
+Now	O
+,	O
+as	O
+more	O
+details	O
+emerge	O
+,	O
+this	O
+special	O
+treatment	O
+has	O
+moved	O
+to	O
+a	O
+level	O
+that	O
+is	O
+even	B-PROP
+more	I-PROP
+insidious	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Protest	O
+at	O
+AT&T	O
+Stadium	O
+pic.twitter.com/lu5VsGQByv	O
+—	O
+Allison	O
+Harris	O
+(	O
+@AllisonFox4News	O
+)	O
+September	O
+16	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+John	O
+Bolton	O
+Richard	O
+Grenell	O
+Dina	O
+Powell	O
+Heather	O
+Nauert	O
+Ivanka	O
+Trump	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Email	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Freedom	O
+Outpost	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+From	O
+the	O
+beginning	O
+of	O
+this	O
+case	O
+,	O
+it	O
+was	O
+clear	O
+that	O
+Guyger	O
+was	O
+receiving	O
+special	O
+treatment	O
+from	O
+law	O
+enforcement	O
+.	O
+
+One	O
+of	O
+the	O
+most	O
+glaring	B-PROP
+instances	O
+showing	O
+her	O
+privilege	O
+was	O
+the	O
+fact	O
+that	O
+the	O
+Texas	O
+Rangers	O
+said	O
+in	O
+their	O
+report	O
+that	O
+Jean	O
+refused	O
+to	O
+obey	O
+Guyger	O
+’s	O
+“	O
+verbal	O
+commands	O
+.	O
+”	O
+Had	B-PROP
+anyone	I-PROP
+else	I-PROP
+but	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+cop	I-PROP
+walked	O
+into	O
+an	O
+apartment	O
+and	O
+killed	O
+an	O
+innocent	O
+man	O
+,	O
+do	O
+you	O
+believe	O
+that	O
+investigators	O
+would	O
+have	O
+said	O
+anything	O
+like	O
+this	O
+?	O
+
+Attorney	O
+Stephen	O
+Le	O
+Brocq	O
+,	O
+who	O
+operates	O
+a	O
+law	O
+firm	O
+in	O
+the	O
+North	O
+Texas	O
+area	O
+sums	O
+up	O
+the	O
+treatment	O
+of	O
+Guyger	O
+perfectly	O
+when	O
+he	O
+says	O
+that	O
+“	O
+The	O
+affidavit	O
+is	O
+n’t	O
+written	O
+objectively	O
+,	O
+not	O
+at	O
+the	O
+slightest	O
+.	O
+
+As	O
+stated	O
+before	O
+,	O
+they	O
+are	O
+usually	O
+wholly	O
+against	O
+the	O
+accused	O
+.	O
+
+An	O
+objective	O
+view	O
+of	O
+the	O
+information	O
+related	O
+by	O
+the	O
+officer	O
+would	O
+be	O
+proper	O
+,	O
+in	O
+my	O
+opinion	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+affidavit	O
+states	O
+facts	O
+based	O
+upon	O
+the	O
+word	O
+of	O
+the	O
+person	O
+it	O
+seeks	O
+to	O
+accuse	O
+of	O
+criminal	O
+wrongdoing	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+What	O
+’s	O
+more	O
+,	O
+according	O
+to	O
+WFAA	O
+,	O
+who	O
+obtained	O
+affidavits	O
+for	O
+all	O
+of	O
+the	O
+search	O
+warrants	O
+involved	O
+in	O
+the	O
+case	O
+,	O
+none	O
+of	O
+them	O
+involved	O
+the	O
+search	O
+of	O
+Guyger	O
+’s	O
+apartment	O
+.	O
+
+For	O
+those	O
+who	O
+do	O
+n’t	O
+recall	O
+,	O
+police	O
+egregiously	B-PROP
+released	O
+the	O
+search	O
+warrant	O
+findings	O
+of	O
+Jean	O
+’s	O
+apartment	O
+on	O
+the	O
+day	O
+his	O
+family	O
+buried	O
+his	O
+dead	O
+body	O
+.	O
+
+They	O
+attempted	O
+to	O
+assassinate	O
+Jean	O
+’s	O
+character	O
+by	O
+claiming	O
+they	O
+found	O
+less	O
+than	O
+a	O
+half	O
+ounce	O
+of	O
+weed	O
+in	O
+his	O
+apartment	O
+.	O
+
+However	O
+,	O
+they	O
+failed	B-PROP
+miserably	I-PROP
+at	O
+it	O
+.	O
+
+One	O
+thing	O
+in	O
+particular	O
+,	O
+however	O
+,	O
+stood	O
+out	O
+to	O
+those	O
+paying	O
+attention	O
+and	O
+that	O
+is	O
+the	O
+fact	O
+the	O
+police	O
+did	O
+n’t	O
+release	O
+any	O
+information	O
+on	O
+what	O
+they	O
+found	O
+in	O
+Guyger	O
+’s	O
+apartment	O
+.	O
+
+According	B-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+information	I-PROP
+currently	I-PROP
+available	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+because	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+did	I-PROP
+n’t	I-PROP
+search	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+According	O
+to	O
+WFAA	O
+,	O
+there	O
+were	O
+five	O
+search	O
+warrants	O
+issued	O
+in	O
+the	O
+case	O
+—	O
+none	O
+of	O
+which	O
+were	O
+for	O
+the	O
+killer	O
+’s	O
+apartment	O
+.	O
+
+As	O
+WFAA	O
+reports	O
+:	O
+
+Two	O
+of	O
+the	O
+warrants	O
+allowed	O
+investigators	O
+to	O
+remove	O
+the	O
+front	O
+door	O
+of	O
+Guyger	O
+and	O
+Jean	O
+’s	O
+apartment	O
+,	O
+their	O
+door	O
+locks	O
+and	O
+to	O
+download	O
+data	O
+for	O
+their	O
+door	O
+locks	O
+.	O
+
+An	O
+inventory	O
+return	O
+states	O
+that	O
+they	O
+removed	O
+both	O
+of	O
+their	O
+door	O
+lock	O
+and	O
+downloaded	O
+the	O
+data	O
+from	O
+the	O
+door	O
+locks	O
+.	O
+
+A	O
+third	O
+search	O
+warrant	O
+gave	O
+investigators	O
+the	O
+authority	O
+to	O
+enter	O
+Jean	O
+’s	O
+apartment	O
+and	O
+collect	O
+additional	O
+evidence	O
+.	O
+
+A	O
+return	O
+shows	O
+that	O
+investigators	O
+took	O
+photographs	O
+of	O
+his	O
+apartment	O
+,	O
+made	O
+videos	O
+of	O
+his	O
+apartment	O
+,	O
+conducted	O
+“	O
+laser	O
+measurements	O
+of	O
+firearm	O
+trajectory	O
+,	O
+”	O
+and	O
+collected	O
+“	O
+gunshot	O
+residue	O
+”	O
+from	O
+the	O
+door	O
+frame	O
+and	O
+kitchen	O
+wall	O
+of	O
+Jean	O
+’s	O
+apartment	O
+.	O
+
+A	O
+return	O
+for	O
+the	O
+fourth	O
+search	O
+warrant	O
+shows	O
+investigators	O
+seized	O
+video	O
+from	O
+the	O
+surveillance	O
+camera	O
+system	O
+in	O
+the	O
+apartment	O
+management	O
+’s	O
+office	O
+.	O
+
+A	O
+fifth	O
+search	O
+warrant	O
+gave	O
+investigators	O
+the	O
+authority	O
+to	O
+obtain	O
+all	O
+communications	O
+related	O
+to	O
+the	O
+incident	O
+in	O
+the	O
+possession	O
+of	O
+property	O
+management	O
+,	O
+as	O
+well	O
+as	O
+all	O
+surveillance	O
+video	O
+and	O
+all	O
+entry	O
+and	O
+access	O
+logs	O
+from	O
+9	O
+p.m.	O
+to	O
+11	O
+p.m.	O
+on	O
+the	O
+night	O
+of	O
+the	O
+shooting	O
+.	O
+
+An	O
+inventory	O
+return	O
+shows	O
+investigators	O
+seized	O
+a	O
+USB	O
+drive	O
+containing	O
+the	O
+video	O
+,	O
+an	O
+event	O
+log	O
+report	O
+for	O
+“	O
+linear	O
+access	O
+doors	O
+and	O
+gates	O
+,	O
+”	O
+an	O
+“	O
+elevator	O
+access	O
+door	O
+lock	O
+”	O
+report	O
+and	O
+a	O
+“	O
+lock	O
+audit	O
+report	O
+for	O
+both	O
+apartments	O
+.	O
+
+Now	O
+,	O
+even	O
+if	O
+police	O
+would	O
+try	O
+to	O
+search	O
+the	O
+killer	B-PROP
+cop	I-PROP
+’s	O
+apartment	O
+,	O
+it	O
+’s	O
+too	O
+late	O
+.	O
+
+On	O
+Sunday	O
+,	O
+apartment	O
+staff	O
+notified	O
+residents	O
+in	O
+an	O
+email	O
+that	O
+Guyger	O
+“	O
+has	O
+vacated	O
+her	O
+apartment	O
+and	O
+no	O
+longer	O
+resides	O
+at	O
+our	O
+community	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+A	O
+manager	O
+at	O
+the	O
+complex	O
+declined	O
+to	O
+indicate	O
+exactly	O
+when	O
+Guyger	O
+moved	O
+out	O
+and	O
+if	O
+she	O
+left	O
+the	O
+premises	O
+voluntarily	O
+,	O
+the	O
+Dallas	O
+Morning	O
+News	O
+reports	O
+.	O
+
+While	O
+residents	O
+can	O
+certainly	O
+sleep	O
+better	O
+knowing	O
+that	O
+they	O
+do	O
+n’t	O
+have	O
+to	O
+fear	O
+a	O
+killer	B-PROP
+cop	I-PROP
+walking	O
+into	O
+their	O
+apartment	O
+and	O
+murdering	O
+them	O
+,	O
+the	O
+family	O
+of	O
+Botham	O
+Jean	O
+likely	O
+sees	O
+this	O
+as	O
+one	O
+more	O
+instance	O
+of	O
+injustice	O
+.	O
+
+Mother	O
+of	O
+#	O
+BothamJean	O
+,	O
+Allison	O
+Jean	O
+,	O
+says	O
+the	O
+“	O
+smear	B-PROP
+”	I-PROP
+of	O
+her	O
+son	O
+is	O
+unacceptable	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+It	O
+is	O
+time	O
+that	O
+we	O
+recognize	O
+that	O
+lives	O
+matter	O
+,	O
+my	O
+son	O
+’s	O
+life	O
+matters	O
+.	O
+”	O
+pic.twitter.com/UjyKRZ8XeG	O
+—	O
+Jack	O
+Highberger	O
+(	O
+@JackHighberger	O
+)	O
+September	O
+14	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+Article	O
+posted	O
+with	O
+permission	O
+from	O
+The	O
+Free	O
+Thought	O
+Project	O
+
+Are	B-PROP
+You	I-PROP
+Kidding	I-PROP
+Me	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+Ted	I-PROP
+Cruz	I-PROP
+?	I-PROP
+
+Do	O
+n't	O
+"	O
+Blame	O
+The	O
+Police	O
+Officer	O
+"	O
+Who	O
+Admitted	O
+Killing	O
+Botham	O
+Jean	O
+?	O
+
+Dallas	O
+,	O
+TX	O
+—	O
+In	O
+a	O
+repugnant	B-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+outright	I-PROP
+disrespectful	I-PROP
+move	I-PROP
+,	O
+Texas	O
+Senator	O
+Ted	O
+Cruz	O
+went	O
+to	O
+bat	O
+for	O
+Amber	O
+Guyger	O
+,	O
+the	O
+cop	O
+who	O
+admitted	O
+to	O
+taking	O
+the	O
+life	O
+of	O
+the	O
+innocent	O
+26-year	O
+-	O
+old	O
+pillar	B-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+society	I-PROP
+,	O
+Botham	O
+Jean	O
+.	O
+
+During	O
+an	O
+interview	O
+over	O
+the	O
+weekend	O
+,	O
+Cruz	O
+sat	O
+down	O
+with	O
+FOX	O
+26	O
+who	O
+started	O
+with	O
+the	O
+question	O
+of	O
+what	O
+he	O
+thought	O
+about	O
+the	O
+tragic	B-PROP
+killing	O
+of	O
+Jean	O
+by	O
+Guyger	O
+.	O
+
+FOX	O
+26	O
+asked	O
+Cruz	O
+to	O
+respond	O
+to	O
+his	O
+Democratic	O
+midterm	O
+rival	O
+,	O
+Beto	O
+O’Rourke	O
+,	O
+who	O
+called	O
+for	O
+officer	O
+Guyger	O
+to	O
+be	O
+fired	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+I	O
+think	O
+we	O
+are	O
+all	O
+counting	O
+on	O
+the	O
+district	O
+attorney	O
+,	O
+on	O
+those	O
+in	O
+positions	O
+of	O
+trust	O
+and	O
+power	O
+right	O
+now	O
+,	O
+to	O
+do	O
+the	O
+right	O
+thing	O
+,	O
+”	O
+O’Rourke	O
+said	O
+,	O
+implying	O
+that	O
+,	O
+at	O
+the	O
+very	O
+minimum	O
+,	O
+Amber	O
+Guyger	O
+should	O
+be	O
+fired	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+There	B-PROP
+has	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+full	I-PROP
+accounting	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+how	I-PROP
+young	I-PROP
+black	I-PROP
+men	I-PROP
+continue	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+killed	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+this	I-PROP
+country	I-PROP
+without	I-PROP
+accountability	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+without	I-PROP
+justice	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+without	I-PROP
+these	I-PROP
+full	I-PROP
+investigations	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+without	I-PROP
+respecting	I-PROP
+their	I-PROP
+civil	I-PROP
+rights	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+This	O
+can	O
+not	O
+continue	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+John	O
+Bolton	O
+Richard	O
+Grenell	O
+Dina	O
+Powell	O
+Heather	O
+Nauert	O
+Ivanka	O
+Trump	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Name	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Freedom	O
+Outpost	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+response	O
+,	O
+Cruz	O
+lashed	B-PROP
+out	O
+at	O
+O’Rourke	O
+,	O
+claiming	O
+that	O
+he	O
+is	O
+being	O
+too	O
+quick	O
+to	O
+judge	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+I	O
+wish	O
+Beto	O
+O’Rourke	O
+&	O
+Democrats	O
+were	O
+n’t	O
+so	O
+quick	O
+to	O
+always	O
+blame	O
+the	O
+police	O
+officer	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Cruz	O
+said	O
+Saturday	O
+during	O
+an	O
+interview	O
+with	O
+Houston	O
+’s	O
+KRIV	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+She	O
+may	O
+have	O
+been	O
+in	O
+the	O
+wrong	O
+…	O
+but	O
+I	O
+do	O
+n’t	O
+think	O
+we	O
+should	O
+jump	O
+to	O
+conclusions	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Cruz	O
+responds	O
+to	O
+O'Rourke	O
+support	O
+for	O
+DPD	O
+firing	O
+Amber	O
+Guyger	O
+:	O
+"	O
+I	O
+wish	O
+Beto	O
+O’Rourke	O
+&	O
+Democrats	O
+were	O
+n’t	O
+so	O
+quick	O
+to	O
+always	O
+blame	O
+the	O
+police	O
+officer	O
+.	O
+
+...	O
+She	O
+may	O
+have	O
+been	O
+in	O
+the	O
+wrong	O
+...	O
+but	O
+I	O
+do	O
+n’t	O
+think	O
+we	O
+should	O
+jump	O
+to	O
+conclusions	O
+"	O
+amid	O
+investigation	O
+https://t.co/68nHBodrOM	O
+—	O
+Patrick	O
+Svitek	O
+(	O
+@PatrickSvitek	O
+)	O
+September	O
+17	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+Cruz	O
+then	O
+went	O
+on	O
+to	O
+call	O
+the	O
+situation	O
+a	O
+tragedy	O
+and	O
+said	O
+that	O
+if	B-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+jury	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+her	I-PROP
+peers	I-PROP
+finds	I-PROP
+she	I-PROP
+did	I-PROP
+something	I-PROP
+wrong	I-PROP
+then	I-PROP
+Guyger	I-PROP
+should	I-PROP
+suffer	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+consequences	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+To	O
+be	O
+clear	O
+,	O
+Amber	O
+Guyger	O
+admitted	O
+to	O
+doing	O
+something	O
+wrong	O
+.	O
+
+While	O
+controversy	O
+swarms	O
+the	O
+case	O
+of	O
+why	O
+she	O
+may	O
+have	O
+killed	O
+Jean	O
+,	O
+there	O
+is	O
+no	O
+doubt	O
+that	O
+she	O
+did	O
+kill	O
+him	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+is	O
+a	O
+fact	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+public	O
+servant	O
+walked	O
+into	O
+an	O
+innocent	O
+man	O
+’s	O
+home	O
+and	O
+shot	O
+him	O
+dead	O
+.	O
+
+Because	O
+of	O
+her	O
+actions	O
+,	O
+this	O
+man	O
+no	O
+longer	O
+lives	O
+.	O
+
+That	O
+,	O
+Senator	O
+Ted	O
+Cruz	O
+,	O
+is	O
+wrong	O
+.	O
+
+Mistake	O
+or	O
+not	O
+,	O
+she	O
+killed	O
+an	O
+innocent	O
+man	O
+.	O
+
+She	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+only	I-PROP
+one	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+blame	I-PROP
+and	O
+yet	O
+she	O
+is	O
+still	O
+collecting	O
+a	O
+paycheck	O
+from	O
+taxpayers	O
+.	O
+
+Calling	O
+for	O
+Gugyer	O
+to	O
+be	O
+fired	O
+is	O
+not	O
+the	O
+same	O
+as	O
+calling	O
+for	O
+people	O
+to	O
+be	O
+fired	O
+for	O
+making	O
+stupid	B-PROP
+Instagram	O
+posts	O
+or	O
+saying	O
+stupid	B-PROP
+things	O
+—	O
+she	O
+killed	O
+an	O
+innocent	B-PROP
+man	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+At	O
+the	O
+very	O
+least	O
+,	O
+she	B-PROP
+should	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+fired	I-PROP
+from	I-PROP
+her	I-PROP
+job	I-PROP
+which	I-PROP
+gave	I-PROP
+her	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+gun	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+What	B-PROP
+Ted	I-PROP
+Cruz	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+doing	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+same	I-PROP
+thing	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+police	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+their	I-PROP
+apologists	I-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+doing	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+They	B-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+treating	I-PROP
+Guyger	I-PROP
+differently	I-PROP
+because	I-PROP
+she	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+part	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+system	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+In	O
+Cruz	O
+’s	O
+eyes	O
+,	O
+Guyger	O
+going	O
+into	O
+an	O
+apartment	O
+that	O
+was	O
+n’t	O
+her	O
+’s	O
+and	O
+killing	O
+an	O
+innocent	O
+man	O
+was	O
+simply	O
+a	O
+case	O
+of	O
+being	O
+in	O
+the	O
+wrong	O
+place	O
+at	O
+the	O
+wrong	O
+time	O
+—	O
+a	O
+tragic	O
+mistake	O
+that	O
+ruined	O
+two	O
+lives	O
+,	O
+according	O
+to	O
+Cruz	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+that	O
+is	O
+not	O
+the	O
+case	O
+at	O
+all	O
+.	O
+
+Would	O
+Ted	O
+Cruz	O
+and	O
+police	O
+officers	O
+be	O
+following	O
+this	O
+same	O
+narrative	O
+if	O
+the	O
+roles	O
+were	O
+reversed	O
+?	O
+
+If	O
+it	O
+was	O
+Botham	B-PROP
+Jean	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+black	I-PROP
+man	I-PROP
+,	O
+walking	O
+into	O
+the	O
+apartment	O
+of	O
+Amber	B-PROP
+Guyger	I-PROP
+,	O
+a	O
+white	B-PROP
+female	I-PROP
+cop	I-PROP
+,	O
+and	O
+killing	O
+her	O
+—	O
+would	O
+police	O
+and	O
+Ted	O
+Cruz	O
+simply	O
+write	O
+it	O
+off	O
+as	O
+a	O
+tragic	O
+accident	O
+?	O
+
+Of	O
+course	O
+,	O
+we	O
+know	O
+the	O
+answer	O
+to	O
+that	O
+question	O
+and	O
+it	O
+is	O
+a	O
+resounding	B-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+NO	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+To	O
+shut	O
+down	O
+the	O
+peanut	O
+gallery	O
+before	O
+it	O
+begins	O
+,	O
+this	O
+is	O
+not	O
+some	O
+case	O
+of	O
+Democrat	O
+versus	O
+Republican	O
+or	O
+right	O
+versus	O
+left	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+is	O
+a	O
+case	O
+of	O
+right	O
+versus	O
+wrong	O
+,	O
+and	O
+what	O
+Amber	O
+Guyger	O
+did	O
+to	O
+Botham	O
+Jean	O
+was	O
+wrong	O
+.	O
+
+There	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+no	I-PROP
+other	I-PROP
+way	I-PROP
+around	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+,	O
+“	O
+mistake	O
+”	O
+or	O
+not	O
+.	O
+
+From	O
+the	O
+start	O
+of	O
+this	O
+case	O
+,	O
+law	O
+enforcement	O
+have	O
+set	O
+out	O
+to	O
+protect	O
+Guyger	O
+because	O
+she	O
+is	O
+part	O
+of	O
+their	O
+blue	O
+line	O
+.	O
+
+Amber	O
+Guyger	O
+’s	O
+home	O
+was	O
+never	O
+searched	O
+while	O
+Jean	O
+’s	O
+apartment	O
+was	O
+searched	O
+that	O
+night	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+results	O
+of	O
+the	O
+blood	O
+test	O
+to	O
+test	O
+for	O
+alcohol	O
+or	O
+drugs	O
+in	O
+her	O
+system	O
+were	O
+never	O
+released	O
+,	O
+yet	O
+police	O
+—	O
+on	O
+the	O
+day	O
+his	O
+mother	O
+buried	O
+her	O
+son	O
+—	O
+claimed	O
+they	O
+found	O
+marijuana	O
+in	O
+his	O
+house	O
+.	O
+
+It	O
+’s	O
+been	O
+a	O
+smear	B-PROP
+campaign	I-PROP
+from	O
+the	O
+beginning	O
+and	O
+it	O
+is	O
+this	O
+way	O
+by	O
+design	O
+.	O
+
+Amber	B-PROP
+Guyger	O
+took	O
+an	O
+innocent	O
+person	O
+’s	O
+life	O
+,	O
+and	O
+because	O
+people	O
+are	O
+so	O
+blinded	O
+by	O
+the	O
+badge	O
+,	O
+she	O
+is	O
+being	O
+portrayed	O
+as	O
+the	O
+victim	O
+.	O
+
+To	O
+those	O
+who	O
+attempt	O
+to	O
+claim	O
+there	O
+is	O
+no	O
+bias	O
+in	O
+this	O
+horrifically	B-PROP
+flawed	I-PROP
+system	I-PROP
+,	O
+if	B-PROP
+ever	I-PROP
+there	I-PROP
+was	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+case	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+prove	I-PROP
+you	I-PROP
+wrong	I-PROP
+—	I-PROP
+this	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+A	B-PROP
+tragedy	I-PROP
+indeed	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Article	O
+posted	O
+with	O
+permission	O
+from	O
+The	O
+Free	O
+Thought	O
+Project	O
+.	O
+
+Article	O
+by	O
+Matt	O
+Agorist	O
+
+Keith	O
+Ellison	O
+Domestic	O
+Violence	O
+Accuser	O
+:	O
+Democratic	O
+Party	O
+Does	O
+n’t	O
+Believe	O
+My	O
+Story	O
+
+Karen	O
+Monahan	O
+,	O
+the	O
+woman	O
+who	O
+accused	O
+Keith	O
+Ellison	O
+of	O
+domestic	O
+abuse	O
+,	O
+says	O
+Democrats	O
+do	O
+n’t	O
+believe	O
+her	O
+and	O
+are	O
+turning	B-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+blind	I-PROP
+eye	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+ear	I-PROP
+toward	I-PROP
+her	O
+claims	O
+—	O
+yet	O
+curiously	O
+,	O
+finding	O
+time	O
+and	O
+cause	O
+to	O
+go	O
+after	O
+Brett	O
+Kavanaugh	O
+.	O
+
+Democrats	O
+,	O
+they	O
+do	O
+pick	O
+their	O
+“	O
+victims	O
+”	O
+well	O
+,	O
+do	O
+n’t	O
+they	O
+?	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+John	O
+Bolton	O
+Richard	O
+Grenell	O
+Dina	O
+Powell	O
+Heather	O
+Nauert	O
+Ivanka	O
+Trump	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Comments	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Freedom	O
+Outpost	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+Monahan	O
+is	O
+Ellison	O
+’s	O
+former	O
+girlfriend	O
+,	O
+and	O
+she	O
+came	O
+forward	O
+a	O
+month	O
+ago	O
+to	O
+say	O
+the	O
+Democrat	B-PROP
+,	O
+now	O
+seeking	O
+an	O
+attorney	O
+general	O
+’s	O
+slot	O
+in	O
+Minnesota	O
+,	O
+sent	O
+her	O
+threatening	O
+text	O
+messages	O
+and	O
+physically	O
+hurt	O
+her	O
+in	O
+one	O
+of	O
+their	O
+confrontations	O
+.	O
+
+Yet	B-PROP
+Democrats	I-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+n’t	I-PROP
+think	I-PROP
+his	I-PROP
+accuser	I-PROP
+meets	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+same	I-PROP
+threshhold	I-PROP
+as	I-PROP
+Kavanaugh	I-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+accuser	I-PROP
+?	I-PROP
+
+Apparently	O
+.	O
+
+More	O
+,	O
+from	O
+Fox	O
+News	O
+:	O
+
+The	O
+woman	O
+who	O
+accused	O
+Minnesota	O
+Democratic	O
+Rep.	O
+Keith	O
+Ellison	O
+of	O
+domestic	O
+abuse	O
+said	O
+on	O
+Monday	O
+that	O
+Democrats	O
+do	O
+n’t	O
+believe	O
+her	O
+story	O
+and	O
+threatened	O
+to	O
+isolate	O
+her	O
+over	O
+the	O
+allegations	O
+.	O
+
+Karen	O
+Monahan	O
+,	O
+a	O
+former	O
+girlfriend	O
+,	O
+came	O
+forward	O
+last	O
+month	O
+alleging	O
+that	O
+Ellison	O
+sent	O
+her	O
+threatening	O
+text	O
+messages	O
+and	O
+once	O
+screamed	O
+obscenities	O
+at	O
+her	O
+as	O
+he	O
+dragged	O
+her	O
+off	O
+a	O
+bed	O
+by	O
+her	O
+feet	O
+.	O
+
+Ellison	O
+has	O
+denied	O
+the	O
+accusations	O
+,	O
+saying	O
+he	O
+“	O
+never	O
+behaved	O
+this	O
+way	O
+.	O
+”	O
+He	O
+did	O
+acknowledge	O
+he	O
+was	O
+in	O
+a	O
+relationship	O
+with	O
+the	O
+woman	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+allegations	O
+did	O
+n’t	O
+lead	O
+to	O
+any	O
+immediate	O
+action	O
+against	O
+the	O
+congressman	O
+,	O
+except	O
+for	O
+the	O
+announcement	O
+that	O
+the	O
+Democratic	O
+National	O
+Committee	O
+(	O
+DNC	O
+)	O
+would	O
+review	O
+the	O
+accusations	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+went	O
+on	O
+to	O
+win	O
+the	O
+Democratic	O
+primary	O
+election	O
+for	O
+Minnesota	O
+attorney	O
+general	O
+.	O
+
+Monahan	O
+slammed	O
+the	O
+Democratic	O
+Party	O
+for	O
+its	O
+response	O
+to	O
+her	O
+allegations	O
+when	O
+compared	O
+to	O
+its	O
+treatment	O
+of	O
+Christine	O
+Blasey	O
+Ford	O
+.	O
+
+Ford	O
+has	O
+accused	O
+Supreme	O
+Court	O
+nominee	O
+Brett	O
+Kavanaugh	O
+of	O
+attempting	O
+to	O
+force	O
+himself	O
+onto	O
+her	O
+during	O
+at	O
+a	O
+high	O
+school	O
+party	O
+nearly	O
+four	O
+decades	O
+ago	O
+,	O
+prompting	O
+prominent	O
+Democrats	O
+to	O
+get	O
+behind	O
+Ford	O
+’s	O
+allegations	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+No	O
+,	O
+they	O
+do	O
+n’t	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Monahan	O
+tweeted	O
+in	O
+response	O
+to	O
+a	O
+question	O
+whether	O
+the	O
+party	O
+believes	O
+women	O
+’s	O
+stories	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+I	O
+’ve	O
+been	O
+smeared	O
+,	O
+threatened	O
+,	O
+isolated	O
+from	O
+my	O
+own	O
+party	O
+.	O
+
+I	O
+provided	O
+medical	O
+records	O
+from	O
+2017	O
+,	O
+stating	O
+on	O
+two	O
+different	O
+Dr.	O
+
+Visits	O
+,	O
+I	O
+told	O
+them	O
+about	O
+the	O
+abuse	O
+and	O
+who	O
+did	O
+it	O
+.	O
+
+My	O
+therapist	O
+released	O
+records	O
+stating	O
+I	O
+have	O
+been	O
+dealing	O
+and	O
+healing	O
+from	O
+the	O
+abuse	O
+.	O
+”	O
+She	O
+added	O
+:	O
+“	O
+Four	O
+people	O
+,	O
+including	O
+my	O
+supervisor	O
+at	O
+the	O
+time	O
+,	O
+stated	O
+that	O
+I	O
+came	O
+to	O
+them	O
+after	O
+and	O
+shared	O
+the	O
+exact	O
+story	O
+I	O
+shared	O
+publicly	O
+,	O
+I	O
+shared	O
+multiple	O
+text	O
+between	O
+me	O
+and	O
+Keith	O
+,	O
+where	O
+I	O
+discuss	O
+the	O
+abuse	O
+with	O
+him	O
+and	O
+much	O
+more	O
+.	O
+
+As	O
+I	O
+said	O
+before	O
+,	O
+I	O
+knew	O
+I	O
+would	O
+n’t	O
+be	O
+believed	O
+.	O
+”	O
+Her	O
+comment	O
+came	O
+after	O
+another	O
+user	O
+pointed	O
+to	O
+comments	O
+made	O
+by	O
+Peter	O
+Daou	O
+,	O
+a	O
+Democratic	O
+strategist	O
+and	O
+former	O
+advisor	O
+to	O
+Hillary	O
+Clinton	O
+and	O
+John	O
+Kerry	O
+,	O
+who	O
+wrote	O
+in	O
+a	O
+tweet	O
+that	O
+the	B-PROP
+Kavanaugh	O
+accuser	O
+will	O
+be	O
+“	O
+attacked	B-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+smeared	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+demonized	I-PROP
+”	O
+and	O
+that	O
+people	O
+must	O
+“	O
+believe	O
+women	O
+.	O
+”	O
+Many	O
+other	O
+Democrats	O
+and	O
+progressives	O
+–	O
+who	O
+stayed	O
+silent	O
+when	O
+the	O
+accusations	O
+against	O
+Ellison	O
+emerged	O
+–	O
+came	O
+out	O
+in	O
+support	O
+of	O
+Ford	O
+,	O
+including	O
+Vermont	O
+Sen.	O
+Bernie	O
+Sanders	O
+and	O
+Tom	O
+Perez	O
+,	O
+chairman	O
+of	O
+the	O
+DNC	O
+,	O
+who	O
+urged	O
+to	O
+investigate	O
+the	O
+claims	O
+and	O
+Kavanaugh	O
+.	O
+
+Monahan	O
+went	O
+to	O
+reiterate	O
+that	O
+her	O
+story	O
+has	O
+nothing	O
+to	O
+do	O
+with	O
+politics	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+I	O
+have	O
+nothing	O
+to	O
+prove	O
+to	O
+anyone	O
+,	O
+I	O
+simply	O
+shared	O
+my	O
+story	O
+.	O
+
+People	O
+can	O
+believe	O
+it	O
+or	O
+not	O
+.	O
+
+I	O
+do	O
+n’t	O
+need	O
+anyone	O
+to	O
+affirm	O
+my	O
+humanity	O
+,	O
+I	O
+affirmed	O
+it	O
+,	O
+”	O
+she	O
+wrote	O
+in	O
+another	O
+tweet	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+The	O
+fact	O
+that	O
+both	O
+parties	O
+only	O
+care	O
+if	O
+it	O
+scores	O
+political	O
+points	O
+is	O
+hypocritical	B-PROP
+,	O
+”	O
+she	O
+added	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Do	O
+you	O
+think	O
+a	O
+person	O
+who	O
+has	O
+dealt	O
+with	O
+any	O
+form	O
+of	O
+abuse	O
+by	O
+politicians	O
+is	O
+thinking	O
+about	O
+politics	O
+?	O
+
+No	O
+,	O
+we	O
+&	O
+are	O
+families	O
+are	O
+trying	O
+to	O
+heal	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Article	O
+posted	O
+with	O
+permission	O
+from	O
+Pamela	O
+Geller	O
+
+‘	O
+Emotional	O
+And	O
+Physical	O
+Abuse	O
+’	O
+:	O
+Muslim	O
+Brotherhood	O
+DNC	O
+Deputy	O
+Chair	O
+Ellison	O
+Accuser	O
+Posts	O
+Doctor	O
+’s	O
+Report	O
+Naming	O
+Him	O
+As	O
+Alleged	O
+Abuser	O
+
+There	O
+is	O
+abundant	O
+evidence	O
+that	O
+Karen	O
+Monahan	O
+is	O
+telling	O
+the	O
+truth	O
+when	O
+she	O
+says	O
+that	O
+Muslim	O
+Brotherhood	O
+Congressman	O
+Hakim	O
+Muhammad	O
+,	O
+aka	O
+Keith	O
+Ellison	O
+,	O
+abused	O
+her	O
+.	O
+
+By	O
+contrast	O
+,	O
+there	O
+is	O
+absolutely	B-PROP
+no	I-PROP
+evidence	I-PROP
+whatsoever	I-PROP
+that	O
+Brett	O
+Kavanaugh	O
+abused	O
+Christine	O
+Blasey	O
+Ford	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+while	O
+the	O
+Democrats	O
+are	O
+in	B-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+lather	I-PROP
+over	O
+Ford	O
+and	O
+Kavanaugh	O
+,	O
+demanding	O
+a	O
+delay	O
+of	O
+the	O
+confirmation	O
+vote	O
+until	O
+after	O
+the	O
+midterm	O
+elections	O
+that	O
+they	O
+are	O
+sure	O
+will	O
+go	O
+their	O
+way	O
+,	O
+they	B-PROP
+could	I-PROP
+n’t	I-PROP
+care	I-PROP
+less	I-PROP
+about	O
+Karen	O
+Monahan	O
+.	O
+
+And	B-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+shows	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+all	I-PROP
+their	I-PROP
+#	I-PROP
+MeToo	I-PROP
+rhetoric	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+pure	I-PROP
+politically	I-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+motivated	I-PROP
+hypocrisy	I-PROP
+—	O
+as	O
+if	O
+anyone	O
+did	O
+n’t	O
+know	O
+that	O
+by	O
+now	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+‘	O
+Emotional	O
+And	O
+Physical	O
+Abuse	O
+’	O
+:	O
+Ellison	O
+Accuser	O
+Posts	O
+Doctor	O
+’s	O
+Report	O
+Naming	O
+Congressman	O
+As	O
+Alleged	B-PROP
+Abuser	I-PROP
+,	O
+”	O
+by	O
+Peter	O
+Hasson	O
+,	O
+Daily	O
+Caller	O
+,	O
+September	O
+19	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+(	O
+thanks	O
+to	O
+Christian	O
+)	O
+:	O
+
+The	O
+ex	O
+-	O
+girlfriend	O
+accusing	O
+Democratic	O
+Minnesota	O
+Rep.	O
+Keith	O
+Ellison	O
+of	O
+domestic	O
+abuse	O
+told	O
+her	O
+doctor	O
+in	O
+2017	O
+about	O
+alleged	O
+“	O
+emotional	O
+and	O
+physical	O
+abuse	O
+”	O
+from	O
+Ellison	O
+,	O
+according	O
+to	O
+a	O
+document	O
+the	O
+woman	O
+published	O
+Wednesday	O
+.	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+John	O
+Bolton	O
+Richard	O
+Grenell	O
+Dina	O
+Powell	O
+Heather	O
+Nauert	O
+Ivanka	O
+Trump	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Phone	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Freedom	O
+Outpost	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+Karen	O
+Monahan	O
+’s	O
+account	O
+in	O
+the	O
+doctor	O
+’s	O
+report	O
+is	O
+consistent	O
+with	O
+what	O
+she	O
+has	O
+been	O
+saying	O
+publicly	O
+since	O
+August	O
+:	O
+that	O
+Ellison	O
+was	O
+emotionally	O
+and	O
+physically	O
+abusive	O
+to	O
+her	O
+while	O
+the	O
+two	O
+were	O
+dating	O
+.	O
+
+Ellison	O
+is	O
+the	O
+deputy	O
+chair	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Democratic	O
+National	O
+Committee	O
+(	O
+DNC	O
+)	O
+and	O
+is	O
+the	O
+Democratic	O
+nominee	O
+for	O
+Minnesota	O
+attorney	O
+general	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+has	O
+adamantly	O
+denied	O
+emotionally	O
+or	O
+physically	O
+abusing	O
+Monahan	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+She	O
+states	O
+that	O
+she	O
+was	O
+in	O
+a	O
+very	O
+stressful	O
+environment	O
+for	O
+years	O
+,	O
+emotional	O
+and	O
+physical	O
+abuse	O
+by	O
+a	O
+partner	O
+with	O
+whom	O
+she	O
+is	O
+now	O
+separated	O
+,	O
+”	O
+reads	O
+the	O
+November	O
+2017	O
+report	O
+,	O
+a	O
+picture	O
+of	O
+which	O
+Monahan	O
+posted	O
+on	O
+Twitter	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+She	O
+did	O
+not	O
+have	O
+any	O
+physical	O
+injuries	O
+that	O
+required	O
+an	O
+examination	O
+in	O
+the	O
+past	O
+.	O
+
+She	O
+identifies	O
+the	O
+individual	O
+she	O
+was	O
+involved	O
+with	O
+as	O
+congressman	O
+Ellison	O
+,	O
+and	O
+she	O
+is	O
+worried	O
+about	O
+retribution	O
+if	O
+she	O
+identifies	O
+him	O
+publicly	O
+,	O
+”	O
+the	O
+report	O
+states	O
+.	O
+
+Ellison	O
+’s	O
+congressional	O
+office	O
+did	O
+not	O
+immediately	O
+return	O
+a	O
+request	O
+for	O
+comment	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Democratic	O
+Party	O
+has	O
+maintained	O
+its	O
+support	O
+for	O
+Ellison	O
+’s	O
+attorney	O
+general	O
+campaign	O
+despite	O
+the	O
+allegations	O
+.	O
+
+DNC	O
+Chair	O
+Tom	O
+Perez	O
+previously	O
+said	O
+the	O
+committee	O
+was	O
+“	O
+reviewing	O
+”	O
+the	O
+allegations	O
+.	O
+
+Perez	O
+later	O
+deferred	O
+to	O
+an	O
+investigation	O
+by	O
+the	O
+party	O
+’s	O
+Minnesota	O
+arm	O
+,	O
+the	O
+Democratic	O
+-	O
+Farmer	O
+-	O
+Labor	O
+Party	O
+(	O
+DFL	O
+)	O
+,	O
+which	O
+endorsed	O
+Ellison	O
+’s	O
+campaign	O
+in	O
+spite	O
+of	O
+Monahan	O
+’s	O
+allegations	O
+.	O
+
+Monahan	O
+wrote	O
+Wednesday	O
+that	O
+Ellison	O
+declined	O
+any	O
+meeting	O
+with	O
+her	O
+as	O
+part	O
+of	O
+the	O
+investigation	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+I	O
+told	O
+the	O
+investigator	O
+I	O
+would	O
+be	O
+happy	O
+to	O
+talk	O
+with	O
+@keithellison	O
+[	O
+with	O
+]	O
+them	O
+in	O
+the	O
+room	O
+.	O
+
+They	O
+asked	O
+Keith	O
+if	O
+he	O
+would	O
+be	O
+willing	O
+[	O
+and	O
+]	O
+he	O
+declined	O
+any	O
+meeting	O
+[	O
+with	O
+]	O
+me	O
+,	O
+”	O
+she	O
+wrote	O
+…	O
+.	O
+
+Dallas	O
+Chief	O
+Says	O
+She	O
+Ca	O
+n’t	O
+Fire	O
+Amber	O
+Guyger	O
+for	O
+Killing	O
+Botham	O
+Jean	O
+-	O
+Dept	O
+Rules	O
+Imply	O
+Otherwise	O
+
+Dallas	O
+,	O
+TX	O
+—	O
+As	O
+citizens	O
+call	O
+for	O
+justice	O
+in	O
+the	O
+case	O
+of	O
+Dallas	O
+police	O
+officer	O
+Amber	O
+Guyger	O
+—	O
+the	O
+cop	O
+who	O
+killed	O
+the	O
+innocent	O
+Botham	O
+Jean	O
+in	O
+his	O
+own	O
+home	O
+—	O
+the	O
+controversy	O
+continues	O
+to	O
+grow	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+a	O
+town	O
+hall	O
+meeting	O
+this	O
+week	O
+,	O
+citizens	O
+showed	O
+that	O
+they	O
+still	O
+have	O
+a	O
+lot	O
+of	O
+questions	O
+for	O
+the	O
+Dallas	O
+Police	O
+Department	O
+in	O
+regards	O
+to	O
+the	O
+cold	B-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+blooded	I-PROP
+killing	O
+of	O
+Botham	O
+Jean	O
+.	O
+
+On	O
+top	O
+of	O
+questions	O
+as	O
+to	O
+why	O
+it	O
+took	O
+several	O
+days	O
+to	O
+arrest	O
+the	O
+cop	O
+—	O
+despite	O
+the	O
+fact	O
+that	O
+Guyger	O
+admitted	O
+to	O
+it	O
+—	O
+were	O
+questions	O
+like	O
+why	B-PROP
+this	I-PROP
+person	I-PROP
+who	I-PROP
+has	I-PROP
+proven	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+threat	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+society	I-PROP
+has	I-PROP
+yet	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+fired	I-PROP
+from	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+police	I-PROP
+force	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+During	O
+the	O
+meeting	O
+,	O
+as	O
+Chief	O
+Renee	O
+Hall	O
+dodged	O
+several	O
+questions	O
+over	O
+the	O
+details	O
+of	O
+the	O
+arrest	O
+,	O
+she	O
+did	O
+go	O
+out	O
+of	O
+her	O
+way	O
+to	O
+answer	O
+the	O
+question	O
+of	O
+why	O
+Guyger	O
+is	O
+still	O
+collecting	O
+a	O
+paycheck	O
+from	O
+their	O
+department	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+short	O
+of	O
+it	O
+,	O
+according	O
+to	O
+Hall	O
+,	O
+is	O
+she	O
+ca	O
+n’t	O
+fire	O
+her	O
+.	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+John	O
+Bolton	O
+Richard	O
+Grenell	O
+Dina	O
+Powell	O
+Heather	O
+Nauert	O
+Ivanka	O
+Trump	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Email	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Freedom	O
+Outpost	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+I	O
+ca	O
+n’t	O
+do	O
+that	O
+because	O
+there	O
+are	O
+both	O
+local	O
+,	O
+state	O
+and	O
+federal	O
+laws	O
+that	O
+prohibit	O
+me	O
+from	O
+taking	O
+action	O
+.	O
+
+There	O
+are	O
+civil	O
+service	O
+laws	O
+we	O
+have	O
+to	O
+adhere	O
+to	O
+,	O
+”	O
+said	O
+Hall	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+experts	O
+say	O
+this	O
+is	O
+not	O
+true	O
+.	O
+
+As	O
+WFAA	O
+reports	O
+,	O
+Justin	O
+Moore	O
+,	O
+a	O
+civil	O
+rights	O
+attorney	O
+was	O
+a	O
+panelist	O
+at	O
+the	O
+meeting	O
+and	O
+was	O
+surprised	O
+by	O
+the	O
+Chief	O
+’s	O
+comments	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+I	O
+was	O
+completely	O
+mystified	O
+,	O
+and	O
+I	O
+really	O
+did	O
+n’t	O
+understand	O
+where	O
+it	O
+came	O
+from	O
+last	O
+night	O
+.	O
+
+It	O
+seemed	O
+like	O
+Chief	O
+Hall	O
+might	O
+not	O
+have	O
+been	O
+well	O
+informed	O
+on	O
+the	O
+law	O
+,	O
+”	O
+said	O
+Moore	O
+.	O
+
+WFAA	O
+went	O
+further	O
+and	O
+noted	O
+that	O
+the	O
+“	O
+the	O
+Dallas	O
+Police	O
+Department	O
+general	O
+orders	O
+do	O
+allow	O
+the	O
+chief	O
+to	O
+take	O
+action	O
+,	O
+saying	O
+,	O
+‘	O
+The	O
+Chief	O
+of	O
+Police	O
+may	O
+circumvent	O
+all	O
+formal	O
+disciplinary	O
+procedures	O
+to	O
+render	O
+an	O
+immediate	O
+decision	O
+when	O
+it	O
+deems	O
+it	O
+necessary	O
+to	O
+preserve	O
+the	O
+integrity	O
+of	O
+the	O
+department	O
+.	O
+’	O
+”	O
+
+Apparently	O
+,	O
+this	O
+“	O
+integrity	O
+”	O
+is	O
+not	O
+worth	O
+preserving	O
+and	O
+the	O
+Dallas	O
+police	O
+are	O
+going	O
+out	O
+of	O
+their	O
+way	O
+to	O
+keep	O
+a	B-PROP
+killer	I-PROP
+cop	I-PROP
+on	O
+their	O
+payroll	O
+.	O
+
+As	O
+WFAA	O
+pointed	O
+out	O
+,	O
+lots	O
+of	O
+cops	O
+across	O
+the	O
+state	O
+who	O
+have	O
+been	O
+under	O
+criminal	O
+investigation	O
+have	O
+been	O
+fired	O
+by	O
+police	O
+chiefs	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+includes	O
+cops	O
+within	O
+the	O
+Dallas	O
+police	O
+department	O
+.	O
+
+Amy	O
+Wilburn	O
+,	O
+a	O
+former	O
+Dallas	O
+cop	O
+shot	O
+an	O
+unarmed	O
+teen	O
+in	O
+the	O
+stomach	O
+as	O
+he	O
+sat	O
+down	O
+with	O
+his	O
+hands	O
+in	O
+the	O
+air	O
+in	O
+2013	O
+.	O
+
+Days	O
+later	O
+,	O
+after	O
+her	O
+account	O
+was	O
+found	O
+to	O
+be	O
+entirely	O
+false	O
+,	O
+she	O
+was	O
+fired	O
+for	O
+it	O
+.	O
+
+Wilburn	O
+became	O
+the	O
+first	O
+cop	O
+in	O
+41	O
+years	O
+—	O
+since	O
+officer	O
+Darrell	O
+Cain	O
+murdered	O
+a	O
+12-year	O
+-	O
+old	O
+boy	O
+in	O
+the	O
+back	O
+of	O
+his	O
+squad	O
+car	O
+—	O
+to	O
+be	O
+indicted	O
+for	O
+shooting	O
+a	O
+suspect	O
+.	O
+
+Also	O
+in	O
+2013	O
+,	O
+officer	O
+Cardan	O
+Spencer	O
+shot	O
+a	O
+mentally	O
+ill	O
+man	O
+in	O
+his	O
+driveway	O
+.	O
+
+Days	O
+later	O
+,	O
+he	O
+was	O
+also	O
+fired	O
+after	O
+surveillance	O
+video	O
+proved	O
+he	O
+was	O
+lying	O
+about	O
+what	O
+happened	O
+.	O
+
+So	B-PROP
+why	I-PROP
+has	I-PROP
+n’t	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+chief	I-PROP
+fired	I-PROP
+Gugyer	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+who	I-PROP
+has	I-PROP
+actually	I-PROP
+been	I-PROP
+charged	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+arrested	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+admitted	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+killing	I-PROP
+an	I-PROP
+innocent	I-PROP
+man	I-PROP
+?	I-PROP
+
+Like	B-PROP
+all	O
+those	O
+accused	O
+of	O
+a	O
+crime	O
+,	O
+Amber	O
+Guyger	O
+deserves	O
+her	O
+day	O
+in	O
+court	O
+.	O
+
+However	O
+,	O
+as	O
+far	O
+as	O
+her	O
+job	O
+with	O
+the	O
+department	O
+is	O
+concerned	O
+,	O
+she	B-PROP
+has	I-PROP
+already	I-PROP
+proven	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+she	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+no	I-PROP
+longer	I-PROP
+fit	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+duty	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+ever	I-PROP
+again	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+WFAA	O
+asked	O
+the	O
+Dallas	O
+Police	O
+Department	O
+for	O
+the	O
+laws	O
+she	O
+cited	O
+claiming	O
+that	O
+she	O
+ca	O
+n’t	O
+fire	O
+Guyger	O
+,	O
+but	O
+they	O
+did	O
+not	O
+provide	O
+them	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+department	O
+did	O
+respond	O
+about	O
+the	O
+general	O
+order	O
+mentioned	O
+by	O
+WFAA	O
+,	O
+however	O
+,	O
+saying	O
+,	O
+“	O
+General	O
+order	O
+508	O
+refers	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Police	O
+Chief	O
+’s	O
+ability	O
+to	O
+circumvent	O
+the	O
+formal	O
+disciplinary	O
+procedures	O
+not	O
+the	O
+investigative	O
+process	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Exactly	O
+what	O
+“	O
+investigative	O
+process	O
+”	O
+needs	O
+to	O
+happen	O
+before	O
+they	O
+can	O
+fire	O
+her	O
+remains	O
+unclear	O
+as	O
+this	O
+public	O
+servant	O
+admitted	O
+to	O
+killing	O
+an	O
+innocent	O
+man	O
+in	O
+his	O
+own	O
+home	O
+.	O
+
+At	O
+the	O
+very	O
+least	O
+,	O
+she	O
+should	O
+be	O
+fired	O
+for	O
+this	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+then	O
+again	O
+,	O
+as	O
+we	O
+’ve	O
+reported	O
+already	O
+this	O
+week	O
+,	O
+Amber	O
+Guyger	O
+is	O
+subject	O
+to	O
+a	O
+different	O
+set	O
+of	O
+rules	O
+than	O
+common	O
+citizens	O
+,	O
+which	O
+apparently	O
+includes	O
+keeping	O
+a	O
+paycheck	O
+after	O
+admitting	O
+to	O
+killing	O
+an	O
+unarmed	B-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+innocent	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+pillar	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+society	I-PROP
+,	O
+Botham	O
+Jean	O
+.	O
+
+Article	O
+posted	O
+with	O
+permission	O
+from	O
+The	O
+Free	O
+Thought	O
+Project	O
+
+Blue	O
+Privilege	O
+:	O
+Amber	O
+Guyger	O
+Free	O
+on	O
+Bail	O
+as	O
+Activists	O
+Who	O
+Peacefully	O
+Protested	O
+Her	O
+Rot	O
+in	O
+Jail	O
+
+The	O
+case	O
+of	O
+Amber	O
+Guyger	O
+,	O
+the	O
+police	O
+officer	O
+who	O
+admitted	O
+to	O
+shooting	O
+26-year	O
+-	O
+old	O
+Botham	O
+Jean	O
+in	O
+his	O
+apartment	O
+for	O
+no	O
+reason	O
+,	O
+is	O
+a	O
+glaring	B-PROP
+example	I-PROP
+of	O
+“	O
+blue	B-PROP
+privilege	I-PROP
+”	O
+at	O
+work	O
+in	O
+our	B-PROP
+society	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Guyger	O
+claims	O
+that	O
+she	O
+accidentally	O
+entered	O
+the	O
+wrong	O
+apartment	O
+and	O
+shot	O
+a	O
+man	O
+who	O
+she	O
+thought	O
+was	O
+a	O
+burglar	O
+,	O
+however	O
+,	O
+eyewitness	O
+testimony	O
+has	O
+contradicted	O
+her	O
+initial	O
+statement	O
+.	O
+
+Despite	O
+admitting	O
+to	O
+killing	O
+an	O
+innocent	O
+man	O
+and	O
+having	O
+her	O
+initial	O
+statement	O
+contradicted	O
+by	O
+witness	O
+testimony	O
+,	O
+Guyger	O
+has	O
+been	O
+treated	O
+as	O
+more	O
+of	O
+a	O
+victim	O
+than	O
+a	O
+killer	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+fact	O
+,	O
+Guyger	O
+’s	O
+apartment	O
+was	O
+never	O
+even	O
+searched	O
+for	O
+evidence	O
+,	O
+and	O
+she	O
+was	O
+allowed	O
+to	O
+“	O
+vacate	O
+”	O
+the	O
+premises	O
+without	O
+any	O
+type	O
+of	O
+search	O
+.	O
+
+By	O
+not	O
+searching	O
+her	O
+apartment	O
+immediately	O
+,	O
+police	O
+ruined	O
+the	O
+investigation	O
+,	O
+making	O
+it	O
+harder	O
+to	O
+prosecute	O
+her	O
+.	O
+
+It	O
+would	O
+be	O
+reasonable	O
+to	O
+assume	O
+that	O
+these	O
+steps	O
+were	O
+taken	O
+intentionally	O
+because	B-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+want	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+see	I-PROP
+her	I-PROP
+get	I-PROP
+away	I-PROP
+with	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+John	O
+Bolton	O
+Richard	O
+Grenell	O
+Dina	O
+Powell	O
+Heather	O
+Nauert	O
+Ivanka	O
+Trump	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Comments	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Freedom	O
+Outpost	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+Meanwhile	O
+,	O
+Botham	O
+Jean	O
+,	O
+the	O
+actual	O
+victim	O
+,	O
+had	O
+his	O
+house	O
+searched	O
+immediately	O
+.	O
+
+Police	O
+claim	O
+to	O
+have	O
+found	O
+a	O
+very	O
+small	O
+amount	O
+of	O
+marijuana	O
+,	O
+which	O
+they	O
+attempted	O
+to	O
+use	O
+to	O
+smear	B-PROP
+his	I-PROP
+name	I-PROP
+and	O
+somehow	O
+justify	O
+the	O
+killing	O
+.	O
+
+It	O
+is	O
+obvious	O
+in	O
+this	O
+case	O
+that	O
+Guyger	O
+is	O
+receiving	O
+special	O
+treatment	O
+,	O
+not	O
+only	O
+did	O
+she	O
+get	O
+away	O
+without	O
+a	O
+search	O
+,	O
+but	O
+she	O
+turned	O
+herself	O
+in	O
+at	O
+her	O
+own	O
+convenience	O
+and	O
+was	O
+let	O
+out	O
+two	O
+hours	O
+later	O
+.	O
+
+Not	O
+even	O
+the	B-PROP
+richest	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+country	I-PROP
+with	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+best	I-PROP
+lawyers	I-PROP
+would	O
+receive	O
+this	O
+type	O
+of	O
+treatment	O
+if	O
+they	O
+just	O
+admitted	O
+to	O
+killing	O
+an	O
+innocent	O
+person	O
+.	O
+
+There	O
+has	O
+also	O
+been	O
+controversy	O
+over	O
+the	O
+fact	O
+that	O
+Guyger	O
+has	O
+been	O
+charged	O
+with	O
+manslaughter	O
+instead	O
+of	O
+murder	O
+,	O
+which	O
+will	O
+make	O
+it	O
+possible	O
+for	O
+her	O
+to	O
+receive	O
+a	O
+much	O
+short	O
+prison	O
+sentence	O
+.	O
+
+As	O
+Guyger	O
+walks	O
+free	O
+awaiting	O
+her	O
+trial	O
+,	O
+the	O
+9	O
+people	O
+who	O
+were	O
+arrested	O
+protesting	O
+the	O
+murder	O
+and	O
+Guyger	O
+’s	O
+special	O
+treatment	O
+are	O
+still	O
+sitting	O
+behind	O
+bars	O
+.	O
+
+After	O
+a	O
+ceremony	O
+for	O
+Botham	O
+Jean	O
+,	O
+the	O
+protesters	O
+were	O
+arrested	O
+for	O
+obstructing	O
+traffic	O
+.	O
+
+Attorney	O
+Lee	O
+Merritt	O
+,	O
+who	O
+represents	O
+Botham	O
+Jean	O
+’s	O
+family	O
+,	O
+posted	O
+an	O
+update	O
+about	O
+the	O
+injustice	O
+on	O
+Twitter	O
+.	O
+
+I	O
+just	O
+learned	O
+the	O
+Dallas	O
+9	O
+will	O
+spend	O
+another	O
+night	O
+in	O
+jail	O
+for	O
+peacefully	O
+protesting	O
+brutality	B-PROP
+.	O
+
+Tues	O
+Officer	O
+Wiley	O
+will	O
+be	O
+tried	O
+for	O
+shooting	O
+an	O
+unarmed	O
+man	O
+2x	O
+he	O
+wrongfully	O
+suspected	O
+of	O
+burglarizing	O
+his	O
+own	O
+car	O
+.	O
+
+D-9	O
+have	O
+already	O
+spent	O
+more	O
+time	O
+in	O
+jail	O
+then	O
+he	O
+ever	O
+has	O
+.	O
+
+pic.twitter.com/mGHOzsN6Pp	O
+—	O
+S.	O
+Lee	O
+Merritt	O
+,	O
+Esq	O
+.	O
+
+(	O
+@MeritLaw	O
+)	O
+September	O
+17	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+“	O
+The	O
+officer	O
+responsible	O
+for	O
+the	O
+completely	O
+unjustifiable	B-PROP
+shooting	O
+death	O
+of	O
+O’Shea	O
+Terry	O
+has	O
+been	O
+returned	O
+to	O
+light	O
+duty	O
+and	O
+has	O
+faced	O
+no	O
+criminal	O
+charges	O
+whatsoever	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+officer	O
+who	O
+shot	O
+and	O
+killed	O
+Botham	O
+Jean	O
+remains	O
+on	O
+the	O
+Dallas	O
+police	O
+force	O
+and	O
+was	O
+able	O
+to	O
+bond	O
+out	O
+on	O
+manslaughter	O
+charges	O
+in	O
+a	O
+fraction	O
+of	O
+the	O
+time	O
+the	O
+protestors	O
+have	O
+spent	O
+in	O
+jail	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Merritt	O
+said	O
+in	O
+a	O
+statement	O
+.	O
+
+Merrit	O
+cast	O
+suspicion	O
+on	O
+the	O
+police	O
+for	O
+intentionally	O
+keeping	O
+these	O
+protestors	O
+in	O
+jail	O
+to	O
+send	O
+a	O
+message	O
+and	O
+make	O
+an	O
+example	O
+out	O
+of	O
+them	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+reaction	O
+from	O
+the	O
+police	O
+,	O
+in	O
+this	O
+case	O
+,	O
+has	O
+shown	O
+that	O
+they	B-PROP
+believe	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+have	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+license	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+kill	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+can	I-PROP
+not	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+trusted	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+monitor	I-PROP
+themselves	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+keep	I-PROP
+one	I-PROP
+another	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+check	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+They	B-PROP
+have	I-PROP
+no	I-PROP
+interest	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+serving	I-PROP
+justice	I-PROP
+when	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+comes	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+enforcing	I-PROP
+crimes	I-PROP
+against	I-PROP
+their	I-PROP
+own	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+Article	O
+posted	O
+with	O
+permission	O
+from	O
+John	O
+Vibes	O
+.	O
+
+Cop	B-PROP
+Killer	I-PROP
+Supporter	I-PROP
+Keith	O
+Ellison	O
+Calls	O
+Cops	O
+To	O
+Protect	O
+Him	O
+From	O
+Female	O
+Journalist	O
+Armed	O
+With	O
+Mic	O
+&	O
+Camera	O
+Phone	O
+
+Rep.	O
+Keith	O
+Ellison	O
+(	O
+D	O
+-	O
+MN	O
+)	O
+is	B-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+epitome	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+an	I-PROP
+effeminate	I-PROP
+man	I-PROP
+today	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+America	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+He	O
+stands	O
+accused	O
+by	O
+two	O
+women	O
+who	O
+claim	O
+that	O
+he	O
+not	O
+only	O
+verbally	O
+abused	O
+them	O
+,	O
+but	O
+physically	O
+assaulted	O
+them	O
+as	O
+well	O
+,	O
+and	O
+no	O
+,	O
+these	O
+women	O
+did	O
+n't	O
+wait	O
+decades	O
+or	O
+even	O
+till	O
+there	O
+was	O
+a	O
+politically	O
+opportune	O
+time	O
+to	O
+voice	O
+their	O
+accusations	O
+.	O
+
+One	O
+even	O
+had	O
+reported	O
+him	O
+to	O
+the	O
+police	O
+.	O
+
+Investigative	O
+journalist	O
+Laura	O
+Loomer	O
+was	O
+informed	O
+by	O
+police	O
+in	O
+Minnesota	O
+that	O
+he	O
+wanted	O
+police	O
+protection	O
+from	O
+her	O
+when	O
+he	O
+found	O
+out	O
+she	O
+was	O
+attending	O
+the	O
+education	O
+forum	O
+that	O
+was	O
+held	O
+Saturday	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+is	O
+a	B-PROP
+man	I-PROP
+who	I-PROP
+follows	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+demonic	I-PROP
+religion	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+Islam	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+supports	I-PROP
+cop	I-PROP
+killers	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+He	O
+does	O
+all	O
+of	O
+this	O
+while	O
+he	O
+stands	O
+accused	O
+of	O
+abusing	O
+women	O
+and	O
+running	O
+to	O
+be	O
+attorney	O
+general	O
+in	O
+Minnesota	O
+,	O
+even	O
+though	O
+he	O
+possesses	O
+no	O
+attorney	O
+'s	O
+license	O
+that	O
+is	O
+valid	O
+.	O
+
+Here	O
+'s	O
+Loomer	O
+'s	O
+tweet	O
+from	O
+Sunday	O
+with	O
+video	O
+of	O
+her	O
+speaking	O
+to	O
+a	O
+policeman	O
+about	O
+it	O
+.	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+John	O
+Bolton	O
+Richard	O
+Grenell	O
+Dina	O
+Powell	O
+Heather	O
+Nauert	O
+Ivanka	O
+Trump	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Name	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Freedom	O
+Outpost	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+An	O
+Officer	O
+in	O
+Minnesota	O
+informed	O
+me	O
+that	O
+Keith	O
+Ellison	O
+’s	O
+campaign	O
+contacted	O
+Apple	O
+Valley	O
+Police	O
+in	O
+MN	O
+&	O
+told	O
+them	O
+he	O
+wanted	O
+police	O
+protection	O
+from	O
+me	O
+when	O
+he	O
+found	O
+out	O
+I	O
+was	O
+attending	O
+the	O
+education	O
+forum	O
+that	O
+was	O
+held	O
+yesterday	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Loomer	O
+wrote	O
+.	O
+
+SCOOP	O
+:	O
+An	O
+Officer	O
+in	O
+Minnesota	O
+informed	O
+me	O
+that	O
+Keith	O
+Ellison	O
+’s	O
+campaign	O
+contacted	O
+Apple	O
+Valley	O
+Police	O
+in	O
+MN	O
+&	O
+told	O
+them	O
+he	O
+wanted	O
+police	O
+protection	O
+from	O
+me	O
+when	O
+he	O
+found	O
+out	O
+I	O
+was	O
+attending	O
+the	O
+education	O
+forum	O
+that	O
+was	O
+held	O
+yesterday	O
+.	O
+
+THAT	O
+IS	O
+WHY	O
+the	O
+police	O
+were	O
+there	O
+.	O
+
+👇	O
+🏻	O
+pic.twitter.com/ABIvsJNW4d	O
+—	O
+Laura	O
+Loomer	O
+(	O
+@LauraLoomer	O
+)	O
+September	O
+23	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+On	O
+Saturday	O
+,	O
+there	O
+was	O
+an	O
+education	O
+panel	O
+at	O
+the	O
+Education	O
+Minnesota	O
+Apple	O
+Valley	O
+open	O
+to	O
+union	O
+members	O
+and	O
+guests	O
+.	O
+
+Prior	O
+to	O
+the	O
+event	O
+,	O
+Ellison	O
+'s	O
+campaign	O
+called	O
+police	O
+to	O
+ensure	O
+that	O
+he	O
+was	O
+"	O
+protected	O
+"	O
+from	O
+a	O
+woman	O
+armed	O
+with	O
+a	O
+mic	O
+and	O
+camera	O
+phone	O
+.	O
+
+Loomer	O
+peppered	B-PROP
+him	O
+with	O
+questions	O
+about	O
+the	O
+alleged	O
+abuse	O
+at	O
+a	O
+State	O
+Attorney	O
+General	O
+debate	O
+Friday	O
+night	O
+.	O
+
+She	O
+stood	O
+alongside	O
+other	O
+female	O
+survivors	O
+of	O
+abuse	O
+.	O
+
+Ellison	O
+not	O
+only	O
+claimed	O
+the	O
+women	O
+were	O
+lying	O
+but	O
+then	O
+fled	O
+the	O
+scene	O
+.	O
+
+At	O
+least	O
+he	O
+said	O
+something	O
+there	O
+,	O
+which	O
+is	O
+more	O
+than	O
+I	O
+can	O
+say	O
+for	O
+his	O
+response	O
+earlier	O
+in	O
+September	O
+when	O
+Loomer	O
+confronted	O
+him	O
+at	O
+another	O
+event	O
+with	O
+questions	O
+.	O
+
+Failing	O
+to	O
+answer	O
+,	O
+Ellison	O
+tried	O
+to	O
+move	O
+from	O
+person	O
+to	O
+person	O
+,	O
+allowing	O
+his	O
+minions	O
+to	O
+try	O
+and	O
+provide	O
+cover	O
+for	O
+him	O
+,	O
+similar	O
+to	O
+that	O
+of	O
+Maxine	O
+Waters	O
+,	O
+but	O
+there	O
+was	O
+no	O
+"	O
+member	O
+'s	O
+only	O
+"	O
+elevator	O
+to	O
+flee	O
+into	O
+.	O
+
+Finally	O
+,	O
+Ellison	O
+fled	O
+the	O
+scene	O
+,	O
+hounding	O
+by	O
+Loomer	O
+and	O
+others	O
+questioning	O
+him	O
+about	O
+the	O
+abuse	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+irony	O
+is	O
+of	O
+Ellison	O
+'s	O
+campaign	O
+calling	O
+on	O
+the	O
+police	O
+to	O
+protect	O
+him	O
+from	O
+a	O
+woman	O
+,	O
+armed	O
+with	O
+a	O
+mic	O
+and	O
+camera	O
+phone	O
+,	O
+who	O
+is	O
+simply	O
+asking	O
+him	O
+to	O
+respond	O
+to	O
+the	O
+accusations	O
+and	O
+police	O
+report	O
+,	O
+as	O
+well	O
+as	O
+how	O
+he	O
+plans	O
+on	O
+being	O
+attorney	O
+general	O
+without	O
+a	O
+license	O
+,	O
+when	O
+he	O
+has	O
+shown	O
+his	O
+support	O
+for	O
+those	O
+that	O
+murder	O
+police	O
+officers	O
+in	O
+cold	O
+blood	O
+.	O
+
+Scott	O
+Johnson	O
+reports	O
+on	O
+Ellison	O
+'s	O
+sordid	B-PROP
+history	O
+supporting	O
+such	O
+criminals	O
+.	O
+
+Ellison	O
+was	O
+an	O
+active	O
+supporter	O
+and	O
+local	O
+leader	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Nation	O
+of	O
+Islam	O
+in	O
+Minneapolis	O
+before	O
+his	O
+election	O
+to	O
+Congress	O
+.	O
+
+(	O
+I	O
+set	O
+forth	O
+this	O
+history	O
+in	O
+some	O
+detail	O
+in	O
+the	O
+October	O
+9	O
+,	O
+2006	O
+issue	O
+of	O
+The	O
+Weekly	O
+Standard	O
+.	O
+)	O
+
+Ellison	O
+has	O
+baldly	B-PROP
+dissembled	I-PROP
+about	O
+this	O
+history	O
+since	O
+2006	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+his	O
+2014	O
+memoir	O
+My	O
+Country	O
+,	O
+’	O
+Tis	O
+of	O
+Thee	O
+,	O
+for	O
+example	O
+,	O
+Ellison	O
+simply	O
+omitted	O
+it	O
+and	O
+presented	O
+himself	O
+as	O
+a	O
+critic	O
+of	O
+Farrakhan	O
+and	O
+the	O
+Nation	O
+of	O
+Islam	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+past	O
+June	O
+,	O
+Ellison	O
+told	O
+Jake	O
+Tapper	O
+on	O
+CNN	O
+,	O
+“	O
+I	O
+worked	O
+on	O
+the	O
+Million	O
+Man	O
+March	O
+and	O
+I	O
+was	O
+proud	O
+to	O
+do	O
+so	O
+.	O
+
+That	B-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+.	O
+”	O
+But	O
+that	O
+was	O
+n’t	O
+it	O
+.	O
+
+Ellison	O
+first	O
+sought	O
+office	O
+as	O
+a	O
+Democrat	O
+in	O
+1998	O
+as	O
+Keith	O
+Ellison	O
+-	O
+Muhammad	O
+,	O
+a	O
+self	O
+-	O
+avowed	O
+member	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Nation	O
+of	O
+Islam	O
+.	O
+
+(	O
+Ellison	O
+-	O
+Muhammad	O
+is	O
+just	O
+one	O
+of	O
+three	O
+Nation	O
+of	O
+Islam	O
+names	O
+Ellison	O
+has	O
+used	O
+over	O
+the	O
+years	O
+.	O
+)	O
+
+Fortunately	O
+for	O
+him	O
+,	O
+Ellison	O
+’s	O
+5th	O
+District	O
+constituents	O
+have	O
+n’t	O
+much	O
+cared	O
+about	O
+his	O
+history	O
+and	O
+the	O
+Minneapolis	O
+Star	O
+Tribune	O
+has	O
+almost	O
+entirely	O
+let	O
+it	O
+rest	O
+exactly	O
+where	O
+Ellison	O
+wants	O
+it	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+seeking	O
+the	O
+top	O
+law	O
+enforcement	O
+job	O
+in	O
+Minnesota	O
+and	O
+running	O
+for	O
+statewide	O
+office	O
+should	O
+be	O
+a	O
+more	O
+daunting	O
+challenge	O
+because	O
+Ellison	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+an	I-PROP
+extraordinarily	I-PROP
+poor	I-PROP
+fit	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+job	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Among	O
+the	O
+troubling	O
+threads	O
+that	O
+run	O
+through	O
+Ellison	O
+’s	O
+career	O
+:	O
+support	O
+for	O
+cop	B-PROP
+killers	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+In	O
+September	O
+1992	O
+Minneapolis	O
+police	O
+officer	O
+Jerry	O
+Haaf	O
+was	O
+murdered	O
+execution	O
+-	O
+style	O
+,	O
+shot	O
+in	O
+the	O
+back	O
+as	O
+he	O
+took	O
+a	O
+coffee	O
+break	O
+at	O
+a	O
+restaurant	O
+in	O
+south	O
+Minneapolis	O
+.	O
+
+Police	O
+later	O
+determined	O
+that	O
+Haaf	O
+’s	O
+murder	O
+was	O
+a	O
+gang	O
+hit	O
+performed	O
+by	O
+four	O
+members	O
+of	O
+the	O
+city	O
+’s	O
+Vice	O
+Lords	O
+gang	O
+.	O
+The	O
+leader	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Vice	O
+Lords	O
+was	O
+Sharif	O
+Willis	O
+,	O
+a	O
+convicted	O
+murderer	O
+who	O
+had	O
+been	O
+released	O
+from	O
+prison	O
+and	O
+who	O
+sought	O
+respectability	O
+as	O
+a	O
+responsible	O
+gang	O
+leader	O
+from	O
+gullible	B-PROP
+municipal	I-PROP
+authorities	I-PROP
+while	O
+operating	O
+a	O
+gang	O
+front	O
+called	O
+United	O
+for	O
+Peace	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+four	O
+Vice	O
+Lords	O
+members	O
+who	O
+murdered	O
+Haaf	O
+met	O
+and	O
+planned	O
+the	O
+murder	O
+at	O
+Willis	O
+’s	O
+house	O
+.	O
+
+Despite	O
+the	O
+fact	O
+that	O
+two	O
+witnesses	O
+implicated	O
+Willis	O
+in	O
+the	O
+planning	O
+he	O
+was	O
+never	O
+charged	O
+because	O
+law	O
+enforcement	O
+authorities	O
+said	O
+they	O
+lacked	O
+sufficient	O
+evidence	O
+to	O
+convict	O
+him	O
+.	O
+
+At	O
+the	O
+time	O
+,	O
+Ellison	O
+was	O
+a	O
+Minneapolis	O
+attorney	O
+in	O
+private	O
+practice	O
+.	O
+
+And	O
+within	O
+a	O
+month	O
+of	O
+Haaf	O
+’s	O
+murder	O
+,	O
+Ellison	O
+appeared	O
+with	O
+Willis	O
+supporting	O
+the	O
+United	O
+for	O
+Peace	O
+gang	O
+front	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+October	O
+1992	O
+,	O
+Ellison	O
+helped	O
+organize	O
+a	O
+demonstration	O
+against	O
+Minneapolis	O
+police	O
+that	O
+included	O
+United	O
+for	O
+Peace	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+The	O
+main	O
+point	O
+of	O
+our	O
+rally	O
+is	O
+to	O
+support	O
+United	O
+for	O
+Peace	O
+[	O
+in	O
+its	O
+fight	O
+against	O
+]	O
+the	O
+campaign	B-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+slander	I-PROP
+the	O
+police	O
+federation	O
+has	O
+been	O
+waging	O
+,	O
+”	O
+said	O
+Ellison	O
+.	O
+
+Willis	O
+was	O
+the	O
+last	O
+speaker	O
+at	O
+the	O
+demonstration	O
+.	O
+
+According	O
+to	O
+a	O
+contemporaneous	O
+report	O
+in	O
+the	O
+St.	O
+Paul	O
+Pioneer	O
+Press	O
+,	O
+Willis	O
+told	O
+the	O
+crowd	O
+that	O
+Minneapolis	O
+police	O
+were	O
+experiencing	O
+the	O
+same	O
+fear	O
+from	O
+young	O
+black	O
+men	O
+that	O
+blacks	O
+had	O
+felt	O
+from	O
+police	O
+for	O
+many	O
+years	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+If	O
+the	O
+police	O
+have	O
+some	O
+fear	O
+,	O
+I	O
+understand	O
+that	O
+fear	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Willis	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+We	O
+seem	O
+to	O
+have	O
+an	O
+overabundance	O
+of	O
+bad	B-PROP
+police	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+.	O
+
+.	O
+
+.	O
+
+[	O
+W]e’re	O
+going	O
+to	O
+get	O
+rid	O
+of	O
+them	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Willis	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+They	B-PROP
+’ve	I-PROP
+got	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+go	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+”	I-PROP
+The	O
+Pioneer	O
+Press	O
+account	O
+concludes	O
+with	O
+Ellison	O
+’s	O
+contribution	O
+to	O
+the	O
+demonstration	O
+:	O
+“	O
+Ellison	O
+told	O
+the	O
+crowd	O
+that	O
+the	O
+police	O
+union	O
+is	O
+systematically	B-PROP
+frightening	I-PROP
+whites	I-PROP
+in	O
+order	O
+to	O
+get	O
+more	O
+police	O
+officers	O
+hired	O
+.	O
+
+That	O
+way	O
+,	O
+Ellison	O
+said	O
+,	O
+the	O
+union	O
+can	O
+increase	O
+its	O
+power	O
+base	O
+.	O
+”	O
+Ellison	O
+publicly	O
+supported	O
+the	O
+Haaf	O
+murder	O
+defendants	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+February	O
+1993	O
+,	O
+he	O
+spoke	O
+at	O
+a	O
+demonstration	O
+for	O
+one	O
+of	O
+them	O
+during	O
+his	O
+trial	O
+.	O
+
+Ellison	O
+led	O
+the	O
+crowd	O
+assembled	O
+at	O
+the	O
+courthouse	O
+in	O
+a	O
+chant	O
+that	O
+was	O
+ominous	B-PROP
+in	O
+the	O
+context	O
+of	O
+Haaf	O
+’s	O
+cold	B-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+blooded	I-PROP
+murder	I-PROP
+:	O
+“	O
+We	B-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+n’t	I-PROP
+get	I-PROP
+no	I-PROP
+justice	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+you	I-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+n’t	I-PROP
+get	I-PROP
+no	I-PROP
+peace	I-PROP
+.	O
+”	O
+Ellison	O
+’s	O
+working	O
+relationship	O
+with	O
+Sharif	O
+Willis	O
+finally	O
+came	O
+to	O
+an	O
+end	O
+in	O
+February	O
+1995	O
+,	O
+when	O
+Willis	O
+was	O
+convicted	O
+in	O
+federal	O
+court	O
+on	O
+several	O
+counts	O
+of	O
+drug	O
+and	O
+gun	O
+-	O
+related	O
+crimes	O
+and	O
+sent	O
+back	O
+to	O
+prison	O
+for	O
+20	O
+years	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Haaf	O
+case	O
+was	O
+n’t	O
+an	O
+aberration	O
+for	O
+Ellison	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+February	O
+2000	O
+,	O
+he	O
+spoke	O
+at	O
+a	O
+fundraiser	O
+sponsored	O
+by	O
+the	O
+Minnesota	O
+chapter	O
+of	O
+the	O
+old	O
+National	O
+Lawyers	O
+Guild	O
+,	O
+on	O
+whose	O
+steering	O
+committee	O
+he	O
+had	O
+served	O
+—	O
+the	O
+chapter	O
+was	O
+raising	O
+funds	O
+for	O
+former	O
+Symbionese	O
+Liberation	O
+Army	O
+member	O
+Kathleen	O
+Soliah	O
+,	O
+who	O
+had	O
+been	O
+a	O
+fugitive	O
+from	O
+justice	O
+for	O
+25	O
+years	O
+,	O
+on	O
+charges	O
+related	O
+to	O
+the	O
+attempted	O
+pipe	O
+bombing	O
+of	O
+Los	O
+Angeles	O
+police	O
+officers	O
+in	O
+1975	O
+.	O
+
+(	O
+The	O
+National	O
+Lawyers	O
+Guild	O
+is	O
+an	O
+old	O
+Communist	O
+front	O
+group	O
+that	O
+somehow	O
+survived	O
+the	O
+fall	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Soviet	O
+Union	O
+.	O
+
+Regimes	O
+come	O
+and	O
+go	O
+;	O
+dupes	O
+are	O
+forever	O
+.	O
+)	O
+
+In	O
+his	O
+National	O
+Lawyers	O
+Guild	O
+speech	O
+Ellison	O
+spoke	O
+favorably	O
+of	O
+cop	O
+killers	O
+Mumia	O
+Abu	O
+-	O
+Jamal	O
+and	O
+“	O
+Assata	O
+Shakur	O
+”	O
+(	O
+Joanne	O
+Chesimard	O
+)	O
+,	O
+who	O
+was	O
+wanted	O
+for	O
+the	O
+murder	O
+of	O
+New	O
+Jersey	O
+state	O
+trooper	O
+Werner	O
+Foerster	O
+in	O
+1973	O
+.	O
+
+Chesimard	O
+was	O
+convicted	O
+of	O
+that	O
+murder	O
+but	O
+escaped	O
+from	O
+prison	O
+in	O
+1979	O
+and	O
+has	O
+been	O
+on	O
+the	O
+lam	O
+in	O
+Cuba	O
+since	O
+1984	O
+.	O
+
+Bryan	O
+Burrough	O
+’s	O
+Days	O
+of	O
+Rage	O
+has	O
+a	O
+riveting	O
+account	O
+of	O
+Chesimard	O
+’s	O
+terrorist	O
+career	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+2013	O
+,	O
+the	O
+FBI	O
+made	O
+Chesimard	O
+the	O
+first	O
+woman	O
+named	O
+to	O
+its	O
+Most	O
+Wanted	O
+Terrorists	O
+List	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+FBI	O
+has	O
+offered	O
+a	O
+reward	O
+of	O
+up	O
+to	O
+$	O
+1,000,000	O
+for	O
+her	O
+capture	O
+.	O
+
+Yet	O
+Ellison	O
+prayed	O
+for	O
+Chesimard	O
+in	O
+his	O
+National	O
+Lawyers	O
+Guild	O
+speech	O
+:	O
+“	O
+I	O
+am	O
+praying	O
+that	O
+Castro	O
+does	O
+not	O
+get	O
+to	O
+the	O
+point	O
+where	O
+he	O
+has	O
+to	O
+really	O
+barter	O
+with	O
+these	O
+guys	O
+over	O
+here	O
+because	O
+they	O
+’re	O
+going	O
+to	O
+get	O
+Assata	O
+Shakur	O
+,	O
+they	O
+’re	O
+going	O
+to	O
+get	O
+a	O
+whole	O
+lot	O
+of	O
+other	O
+people	O
+,	O
+”	O
+he	O
+told	O
+the	O
+crowd	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+I	O
+hope	O
+the	O
+Cuba[n	O
+]	O
+people	O
+can	O
+stick	O
+to	O
+it	O
+,	O
+because	O
+the	O
+freedom	O
+of	O
+some	O
+good	O
+decent	O
+people	O
+depends	O
+on	O
+it	O
+.	O
+”	O
+Ellison	O
+’s	O
+support	O
+for	O
+Soliah	O
+/	O
+Olson	O
+in	O
+the	O
+speech	O
+is	O
+equally	O
+notable	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+denounced	O
+law	O
+enforcement	O
+authorities	O
+for	O
+prosecuting	O
+the	O
+attempted	O
+murder	O
+of	O
+police	O
+officers	O
+.	O
+
+Referring	O
+to	O
+the	O
+days	O
+Soliah	O
+/	O
+Olson	O
+had	O
+spent	O
+in	O
+the	O
+SLA	O
+under	O
+the	O
+leadership	O
+of	O
+Donald	O
+DeFreeze	O
+(	O
+“	O
+Field	O
+Marshal	O
+Cinque	O
+”	O
+)	O
+,	O
+Ellison	O
+hailed	B-PROP
+Soliah	O
+/	O
+Olson	O
+as	O
+a	O
+“	O
+black	B-PROP
+gang	I-PROP
+member	I-PROP
+”	O
+and	O
+portrayed	O
+her	O
+as	O
+a	O
+victim	O
+of	O
+government	O
+persecution	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+described	O
+her	O
+as	O
+one	O
+of	O
+those	O
+who	O
+had	O
+been	O
+“	O
+fighting	O
+for	O
+freedom	O
+in	O
+the	O
+‘	O
+60s	O
+and’70s	O
+”	O
+and	O
+called	O
+for	O
+her	O
+release	O
+.	O
+
+Ellison	O
+to	O
+the	O
+contrary	O
+notwithstanding	O
+,	O
+Soliah	O
+/	O
+Olson	O
+pleaded	O
+guilty	O
+to	O
+the	O
+crimes	O
+charged	O
+in	O
+Los	O
+Angeles	O
+and	O
+to	O
+an	O
+additional	O
+murder	O
+charge	O
+in	O
+Sacramento	O
+.	O
+
+According	O
+to	O
+Ellison	O
+,	O
+Soliah	O
+/	O
+Olson	O
+was	O
+a	B-PROP
+social	I-PROP
+justice	I-PROP
+warrior	I-PROP
+fighting	B-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+good	I-PROP
+fight	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+The	O
+case	O
+had	O
+nothing	O
+to	O
+do	O
+with	O
+the	O
+attempted	O
+murder	O
+of	O
+police	O
+officers	O
+;	O
+that	O
+was	O
+but	O
+a	O
+pretext	O
+.	O
+
+Seems	O
+he	O
+is	O
+more	O
+than	O
+willing	O
+to	O
+use	O
+the	O
+police	O
+to	O
+shield	O
+him	O
+from	O
+the	O
+press	O
+who	O
+will	O
+confront	O
+him	O
+publicly	O
+while	O
+taking	O
+the	O
+side	O
+of	O
+their	O
+murderers	B-PROP
+for	O
+political	O
+gain	O
+.	O
+
+Shame	B-PROP
+on	I-PROP
+you	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+Hakim	I-PROP
+Muhammad	I-PROP
+!	I-PROP
+
+Article	O
+posted	O
+with	O
+permission	O
+from	O
+Sons	O
+Of	O
+Liberty	O
+Media	O
+
+Citing	O
+‘	O
+Adverse	O
+Conduct	O
+’	O
+Police	O
+Finally	O
+Fire	O
+Amber	O
+Guyger	O
+for	O
+Killing	O
+Botham	O
+Jean	O
+
+Dallas	O
+,	O
+TX	O
+—	O
+After	O
+the	O
+Dallas	O
+police	O
+department	O
+refused	O
+to	O
+fire	O
+an	O
+officer	O
+who	O
+admitted	O
+to	O
+killing	O
+an	O
+innocent	O
+man	O
+,	O
+outrage	B-PROP
+erupted	I-PROP
+,	O
+and	B-PROP
+rightfully	I-PROP
+so	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Now	O
+,	O
+however	O
+,	O
+on	O
+Monday	O
+,	O
+the	O
+department	O
+announced	O
+that	O
+officer	O
+Amber	O
+Guyger	O
+has	O
+finally	O
+been	O
+fired	O
+.	O
+
+On	O
+Monday	O
+,	O
+the	O
+Dallas	O
+police	O
+department	O
+announced	O
+that	O
+the	O
+officer	O
+who	O
+admitted	O
+to	O
+walking	O
+into	O
+the	O
+apartment	O
+of	O
+26-year	O
+-	O
+old	O
+Botham	O
+Jean	O
+and	O
+killing	O
+him	O
+was	O
+finally	O
+fired	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Dallas	O
+Police	O
+Chief	O
+U.	O
+Renee	O
+Hall	O
+terminated	O
+Police	O
+Officer	O
+Amber	O
+Guyger	O
+,	O
+#	O
+10702	O
+,	O
+during	O
+a	O
+hearing	O
+held	O
+September	O
+24	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+,	O
+”	O
+the	O
+statement	O
+read	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+An	O
+Internal	O
+Affairs	O
+investigation	O
+concluded	O
+that	O
+on	O
+September	O
+9	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+,	O
+Officer	O
+Guyger	O
+,	O
+#	O
+10702	O
+,	O
+engaged	O
+in	O
+adverse	O
+conduct	O
+when	O
+she	O
+was	O
+arrested	O
+for	O
+Manslaughter	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+John	O
+Bolton	O
+Richard	O
+Grenell	O
+Dina	O
+Powell	O
+Heather	O
+Nauert	O
+Ivanka	O
+Trump	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Email	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Freedom	O
+Outpost	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+department	O
+then	O
+went	O
+on	O
+to	O
+note	O
+that	O
+Guyger	O
+could	O
+appeal	O
+this	O
+firing	O
+under	O
+their	O
+civil	O
+service	O
+rules	O
+.	O
+
+Officer	O
+Guyger	O
+was	O
+terminated	O
+for	O
+her	O
+actions	O
+.	O
+
+She	O
+was	O
+hired	O
+in	O
+November	O
+2013	O
+and	O
+was	O
+assigned	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Southeast	O
+Patrol	O
+Division	O
+.	O
+
+Under	O
+civil	O
+service	O
+rules	O
+,	O
+Officer	O
+Guyger	O
+has	O
+the	O
+right	O
+to	O
+appeal	O
+her	O
+discipline	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+move	O
+is	O
+noteworthy	O
+as	O
+the	O
+department	O
+has	O
+been	O
+standing	O
+up	O
+against	O
+those	O
+who	O
+have	O
+been	O
+calling	O
+for	O
+the	O
+officer	O
+to	O
+be	O
+fired	O
+.	O
+
+As	O
+recently	O
+as	O
+Friday	O
+,	O
+Hall	O
+refused	O
+to	O
+fire	O
+Guyger	O
+,	O
+saying	O
+in	O
+part	O
+,	O
+“	O
+There	O
+is	O
+one	O
+overriding	O
+reason	O
+that	O
+I	O
+have	O
+not	O
+taken	O
+any	O
+administrative	O
+or	O
+employment	O
+action	O
+against	O
+Officer	O
+Amber	O
+Guyger	O
+.	O
+
+I	O
+do	O
+n’t	O
+want	O
+to	O
+interfere	O
+with	O
+the	O
+on	O
+-	O
+going	O
+criminal	O
+investigation	O
+into	O
+her	O
+actions	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Also	O
+,	O
+in	O
+a	O
+town	O
+hall	O
+meeting	O
+last	O
+week	O
+,	O
+Hall	O
+again	O
+stood	O
+behind	O
+her	O
+choice	O
+to	O
+refuse	O
+to	O
+fire	O
+Guyger	O
+,	O
+claiming	O
+it	O
+would	O
+be	O
+against	O
+the	O
+law	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+I	O
+ca	O
+n’t	O
+do	O
+that	O
+because	O
+there	O
+are	O
+both	O
+local	O
+,	O
+state	O
+and	O
+federal	O
+laws	O
+that	O
+prohibit	O
+me	O
+from	O
+taking	O
+action	O
+.	O
+
+There	O
+are	O
+civil	O
+service	O
+laws	O
+we	O
+have	O
+to	O
+adhere	O
+to	O
+,	O
+”	O
+said	O
+Hall	O
+.	O
+
+Apparently	O
+,	O
+it	O
+is	O
+no	O
+longer	O
+against	O
+the	O
+law	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+news	O
+will	O
+likely	O
+be	O
+well	O
+received	O
+by	O
+the	O
+Jean	O
+family	O
+as	O
+well	O
+as	O
+the	O
+activists	O
+who	O
+have	O
+been	O
+calling	O
+for	O
+justice	O
+for	O
+Botham	O
+since	O
+the	O
+beginning	O
+.	O
+
+As	O
+TFTP	O
+previously	O
+reported	O
+,	O
+the	O
+idea	O
+of	O
+not	O
+firing	O
+Guyger	O
+seemed	O
+utterly	B-PROP
+preposterous	I-PROP
+as	O
+she	O
+admitted	O
+to	O
+doing	O
+something	O
+wrong	O
+.	O
+
+While	O
+controversy	O
+swarms	O
+the	O
+case	O
+of	O
+why	O
+she	O
+may	O
+have	O
+killed	O
+Jean	O
+,	O
+there	O
+is	O
+no	O
+doubt	O
+that	O
+she	O
+did	O
+kill	O
+him	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+is	O
+a	O
+fact	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+public	O
+servant	O
+walked	O
+into	O
+an	O
+innocent	O
+man	O
+’s	O
+home	O
+and	O
+shot	O
+him	O
+dead	O
+.	O
+
+Because	O
+of	O
+her	O
+actions	O
+,	O
+this	O
+man	O
+no	O
+longer	O
+lives	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+alone	O
+should	O
+have	O
+been	O
+enough	O
+to	O
+fire	O
+her	O
+.	O
+
+Surprisingly	O
+enough	O
+,	O
+NRA	O
+spokesperson	O
+Dana	O
+Loesch	O
+responded	O
+to	O
+the	O
+firing	O
+of	O
+Guyger	O
+with	O
+one	O
+word	O
+,	O
+“	O
+Good	O
+,	O
+”	O
+showing	O
+her	O
+support	O
+for	O
+the	O
+move	O
+.	O
+
+For	O
+those	O
+who	O
+do	O
+n’t	O
+recall	O
+,	O
+Loesch	O
+sparked	O
+controversy	O
+earlier	O
+this	O
+month	O
+by	O
+claiming	O
+that	O
+if	O
+Botham	B-PROP
+Jean	I-PROP
+were	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+gun	I-PROP
+owner	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+he	I-PROP
+may	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+alive	I-PROP
+today	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Indeed	O
+,	O
+as	O
+TFTP	O
+reported	O
+over	O
+the	O
+weekend	O
+,	O
+a	O
+father	O
+in	O
+Prince	O
+George	O
+’s	O
+County	O
+opened	O
+fire	O
+on	O
+officers	O
+as	O
+they	O
+wrongly	O
+entered	O
+his	O
+apartment	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+shot	O
+two	O
+officers	O
+.	O
+
+Not	O
+only	O
+was	O
+he	O
+not	O
+arrested	O
+,	O
+but	O
+the	O
+police	O
+chief	O
+praised	O
+him	O
+and	O
+apologized	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+response	O
+to	O
+Guyger	O
+’s	O
+termination	O
+,	O
+the	O
+family	O
+’s	O
+attorney	O
+,	O
+Lee	O
+Merritt	O
+noted	O
+that	O
+the	O
+family	O
+expressed	O
+“	O
+satisfaction	O
+”	O
+with	O
+the	O
+move	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+The	O
+Jean	O
+family	O
+expressed	O
+satisfaction	O
+in	O
+this	O
+explanation	O
+and	O
+in	O
+Guyger	O
+’s	O
+termination	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+see	O
+it	O
+as	O
+an	O
+initial	O
+victory	O
+—	O
+well	O
+received	O
+on	O
+the	O
+day	O
+Botham	O
+Jean	O
+is	O
+laid	O
+to	O
+rest	O
+in	O
+his	O
+native	O
+country	O
+in	O
+St.	O
+Lucia	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Merritt	O
+’s	O
+office	O
+said	O
+in	O
+a	O
+statement	O
+,	O
+adding	O
+that	O
+they	O
+are	O
+committed	O
+to	O
+see	O
+a	O
+“	O
+proper	O
+murder	O
+indictment	O
+,	O
+conviction	O
+and	O
+appropriate	O
+sentencing	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Article	O
+posted	O
+with	O
+permission	O
+from	O
+The	O
+Free	O
+Thought	O
+Project	O
+
+Accused	O
+Woman	O
+Abuser	O
+Keith	O
+Ellison	O
+Asks	O
+House	O
+Ethics	O
+to	O
+Investigate	O
+
+Well	O
+,	O
+unlike	O
+Supreme	O
+Court	O
+nominee	O
+Brett	O
+Kavanaugh	O
+,	O
+Rep.	O
+Keith	O
+Ellison	O
+(	O
+D	O
+-	O
+MN	O
+)	O
+,	O
+who	O
+is	O
+running	O
+for	O
+attorney	O
+general	O
+in	O
+Minnesota	O
+without	O
+an	O
+active	O
+attorney	O
+'s	O
+license	O
+,	O
+has	O
+not	O
+stood	O
+before	O
+a	O
+committee	O
+to	O
+deny	O
+or	O
+address	O
+accusations	O
+against	O
+him	O
+by	O
+several	O
+women	O
+who	O
+have	O
+accused	O
+him	O
+of	O
+verbal	O
+and	O
+physical	O
+abuse	O
+.	O
+
+At	O
+least	O
+one	O
+woman	O
+even	O
+filed	O
+a	O
+police	O
+report	O
+about	O
+his	O
+abuse	O
+.	O
+
+No	O
+,	O
+Ellison	O
+has	O
+called	O
+on	O
+the	O
+House	O
+of	O
+Representatives	O
+,	O
+not	O
+the	O
+FBI	O
+,	O
+as	O
+Senate	O
+Democrats	O
+have	O
+urged	O
+in	O
+the	O
+case	O
+of	O
+Judge	O
+Kavanaugh	O
+,	O
+to	O
+investigate	O
+the	O
+claims	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+I	O
+am	O
+taking	O
+this	O
+step	O
+now	O
+because	O
+I	O
+am	O
+innocent	O
+and	O
+eager	O
+to	O
+see	O
+this	O
+entire	O
+matter	O
+resolved	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Ellison	O
+said	O
+in	O
+a	O
+statement	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+These	O
+allegations	O
+have	O
+lingered	O
+in	O
+the	O
+public	O
+sphere	O
+,	O
+and	O
+remain	O
+unsubstantiated	O
+,	O
+"	O
+he	O
+added	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+I	O
+welcome	O
+an	O
+investigation	O
+by	O
+the	O
+House	O
+to	O
+allow	O
+us	O
+to	O
+move	O
+on	O
+.	O
+"	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+John	O
+Bolton	O
+Richard	O
+Grenell	O
+Dina	O
+Powell	O
+Heather	O
+Nauert	O
+Ivanka	O
+Trump	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Comments	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Freedom	O
+Outpost	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+Well	O
+,	O
+that	O
+'s	O
+not	O
+entirely	O
+accurate	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+do	O
+have	O
+a	O
+police	O
+report	O
+,	O
+unlike	O
+the	O
+accusations	O
+against	O
+Brett	O
+Kavanaugh	O
+.	O
+
+Of	O
+course	O
+,	O
+his	O
+supporters	O
+have	O
+hired	O
+an	O
+attorney	O
+to	O
+perform	O
+an	O
+investigation	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Star	O
+Tribune	O
+reports	O
+:	O
+
+The	O
+Minnesota	O
+Democratic	O
+-	O
+Farmer	O
+-	O
+Labor	O
+Party	O
+has	O
+hired	O
+attorney	O
+Susan	O
+Ellingstad	O
+to	O
+conduct	O
+a	O
+separate	O
+investigation	O
+.	O
+
+Ellingstad	O
+is	O
+a	O
+partner	O
+at	O
+the	O
+firm	O
+where	O
+attorney	O
+Charles	O
+Nauen	O
+,	O
+who	O
+represents	O
+the	O
+DFL	O
+,	O
+works	O
+.	O
+
+DFL	O
+Chairman	O
+Ken	O
+Martin	O
+said	O
+on	O
+Tuesday	O
+that	O
+the	O
+investigation	O
+was	O
+finished	O
+or	O
+close	O
+to	O
+finished	O
+and	O
+would	O
+be	O
+released	O
+soon	O
+.	O
+
+Ellison	O
+is	O
+also	O
+deputy	O
+chairman	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Democratic	O
+National	O
+Committee	O
+.	O
+
+After	O
+the	O
+domestic	O
+abuse	O
+allegation	O
+emerged	O
+in	O
+August	O
+,	O
+the	O
+DNC	O
+said	O
+it	O
+is	O
+looking	O
+into	O
+what	O
+happened	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+All	O
+allegations	O
+of	O
+domestic	O
+abuse	O
+are	O
+disturbing	B-PROP
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+taken	O
+seriously	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+are	O
+working	O
+with	O
+the	O
+Minnesota	O
+state	O
+party	O
+to	O
+review	O
+these	O
+allegations	O
+,	O
+”	O
+a	O
+DNC	O
+spokeswoman	O
+said	O
+in	O
+a	O
+statement	O
+Wednesday	O
+morning	O
+,	O
+declining	O
+to	O
+comment	O
+further	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Democratic	O
+Party	O
+’s	O
+choice	O
+of	O
+Ellingstad	O
+to	O
+conduct	O
+the	O
+investigation	O
+was	O
+met	O
+with	O
+derision	O
+from	O
+many	O
+who	O
+said	O
+she	O
+is	O
+not	O
+independent	O
+,	O
+including	O
+Donald	B-PROP
+Trump	I-PROP
+Jr.	I-PROP
+,	O
+who	B-PROP
+mocked	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+investigation	I-PROP
+in	O
+a	O
+Tweet	O
+Wednesday	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+firm	O
+Ellingstad	O
+works	O
+for	O
+,	O
+Lockridge	O
+Grindal	O
+Nauen	O
+,	O
+has	O
+a	O
+political	O
+committee	O
+that	O
+has	O
+donated	O
+to	O
+both	O
+Republican	O
+and	O
+Democratic	O
+candidates	O
+,	O
+including	O
+Ellison	O
+,	O
+according	O
+to	O
+Federal	O
+Election	O
+Commission	O
+filings	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+contributions	O
+to	O
+Democrats	O
+outweigh	O
+the	O
+Republicans	O
+by	O
+a	O
+margin	O
+of	O
+about	O
+four	O
+to	O
+one	O
+.	O
+
+As	O
+we	O
+previously	O
+reported	O
+:	O
+
+Rep.	O
+Keith	O
+Ellison	O
+,	O
+who	O
+is	O
+currently	O
+running	O
+for	O
+attorney	O
+general	O
+of	O
+Minnesota	O
+,	O
+is	O
+being	O
+accused	O
+of	O
+domestic	O
+violence	O
+against	O
+his	O
+former	O
+partner	O
+Karen	O
+Monahan	O
+.	O
+
+Austin	O
+Monahan	O
+,	O
+Karen	O
+Monahan	O
+’s	O
+son	O
+,	O
+aired	O
+the	O
+allegations	O
+in	O
+a	O
+Facebook	O
+post	O
+Saturday	O
+night	O
+.	O
+
+According	O
+to	O
+Austin	O
+Monahan	O
+,	O
+Ellison	O
+put	B-PROP
+his	O
+mother	O
+through	B-PROP
+“	I-PROP
+pure	I-PROP
+hell	I-PROP
+.	O
+”	O
+In	O
+the	O
+Facebook	O
+post	O
+,	O
+he	O
+claims	O
+to	O
+have	O
+seen	O
+a	O
+video	O
+of	O
+Ellison	O
+dragging	O
+Karen	O
+Monahan	O
+off	O
+the	O
+bed	O
+by	O
+her	O
+feet	O
+while	O
+screaming	B-PROP
+expletives	I-PROP
+at	I-PROP
+her	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+The	O
+alleged	O
+incident	O
+is	O
+just	O
+one	O
+of	O
+several	O
+,	O
+Austin	O
+Monahan	O
+warned	O
+.	O
+
+State	O
+Rep.	O
+Debra	O
+Hilstrom	O
+(	O
+D	O
+-	O
+Brooklyn	O
+Center	O
+)	O
+was	O
+quick	O
+to	O
+voice	O
+her	O
+concern	O
+over	O
+the	O
+accusations	O
+,	O
+calling	O
+on	O
+Ellison	O
+to	O
+“	O
+answer	O
+these	O
+allegations	O
+.	O
+”	O
+DFL	O
+-	O
+endorsed	O
+candidate	O
+for	O
+attorney	O
+general	O
+of	O
+Minnesota	O
+Matt	O
+Pelikan	O
+also	O
+reacted	O
+to	O
+the	O
+story	O
+,	O
+calling	O
+the	O
+allegations	O
+“	O
+extremely	B-PROP
+troubling	I-PROP
+.	O
+”	O
+Karen	O
+Monahan	O
+has	O
+also	O
+hinted	O
+at	O
+the	O
+alleged	O
+abuse	O
+on	O
+Twitter	O
+,	O
+telling	O
+Ellison	O
+that	O
+her	O
+“	O
+kids	O
+,	O
+job	O
+,	O
+health	O
+,	O
+finances	O
+,	O
+humanity	O
+was	O
+deeply	B-PROP
+impacted	O
+by	O
+the	O
+abuse	O
+you	O
+are	O
+well	O
+aware	O
+of	O
+.	O
+”	O
+Karen	O
+Monahan	O
+claims	O
+she	O
+has	O
+videos	O
+,	O
+recordings	O
+,	O
+and	O
+messages	O
+to	O
+prove	O
+her	O
+story	O
+.	O
+
+Ellison	O
+has	O
+admitted	O
+the	O
+relationship	O
+,	O
+but	O
+is	O
+denying	O
+the	O
+abuse	O
+.	O
+
+And	O
+the	O
+relationship	O
+was	O
+clearly	O
+real	O
+.	O
+
+Karen	O
+Monahan	O
+,	O
+an	O
+organizer	O
+with	O
+the	O
+Sierra	O
+Club	O
+,	O
+was	O
+in	O
+a	O
+relationship	O
+with	O
+Ellison	O
+for	O
+years	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+two	O
+are	O
+seen	O
+together	O
+in	O
+many	O
+of	O
+her	O
+social	O
+media	O
+posts	O
+,	O
+including	O
+hiking	O
+in	O
+together	O
+national	O
+parks	O
+and	O
+posing	O
+with	O
+the	O
+Obamas	O
+at	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+.	O
+
+Records	O
+show	O
+she	O
+lived	O
+in	O
+his	O
+Minneapolis	O
+home	O
+before	O
+their	O
+relationship	O
+ended	O
+.	O
+
+Ellison	O
+,	O
+who	O
+was	O
+previously	O
+married	O
+to	O
+a	O
+different	O
+woman	O
+,	O
+is	O
+divorced	O
+.	O
+
+It	O
+'s	O
+hard	O
+to	O
+know	O
+what	O
+really	O
+happened	O
+in	O
+a	O
+relationship	O
+.	O
+
+And	O
+the	O
+media	O
+has	O
+kept	O
+it	O
+quiet	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+Keith	O
+Ellison	O
+flatly	O
+denies	O
+allegation	O
+that	O
+he	O
+abused	O
+an	O
+ex	O
+girlfriend	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+story	O
+had	O
+been	O
+circulating	O
+in	O
+MN	O
+,	O
+and	O
+not	O
+held	O
+up	O
+under	O
+media	O
+scrutiny	O
+,	O
+so	O
+no	O
+stories	O
+ran	O
+.	O
+
+It	O
+blew	O
+up	O
+last	O
+night	O
+after	O
+the	O
+ex	O
+’s	O
+son	O
+posted	O
+the	O
+allegation	O
+on	O
+Facebook	O
+.	O
+"	O
+
+Dave	O
+Weigel	O
+.	O
+
+It	O
+'s	O
+not	O
+quite	O
+the	O
+first	O
+time	O
+for	O
+Keith	O
+X.	O
+
+This	O
+is	O
+not	O
+the	O
+first	O
+time	O
+Ellison	O
+has	O
+faced	O
+misconduct	O
+allegations	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+2006	O
+,	O
+a	O
+woman	O
+named	O
+Amy	O
+Alexandar	O
+claimed	O
+that	O
+Ellison	O
+ostracized	O
+her	O
+and	O
+smeared	B-PROP
+her	I-PROP
+name	I-PROP
+after	O
+having	O
+an	O
+extramarital	O
+affair	O
+with	O
+her	O
+in	O
+the	O
+1990s	O
+and	O
+then	O
+again	O
+in	O
+the	O
+2000s	O
+.	O
+
+Ellison	O
+in	O
+2005	O
+filed	O
+a	O
+restraining	O
+order	O
+against	O
+her	O
+after	O
+what	O
+he	O
+described	O
+as	O
+phone	O
+and	O
+email	O
+harassment	O
+.	O
+
+She	O
+subsequently	O
+tried	O
+to	O
+get	O
+a	O
+restraining	O
+order	O
+against	O
+him	O
+,	O
+which	O
+a	O
+judge	O
+denied	O
+,	O
+ordering	O
+her	O
+to	O
+stop	O
+repeating	O
+allegations	O
+of	O
+an	O
+affair	O
+or	O
+intimidation	O
+.	O
+
+Ellison	O
+subsequently	O
+agreed	O
+to	O
+dismiss	O
+his	O
+restraining	O
+order	O
+against	O
+her	O
+if	O
+she	O
+no	O
+longer	O
+contacted	O
+him	O
+.	O
+
+I	O
+'m	O
+not	O
+sure	O
+that	O
+this	O
+is	O
+nothing	O
+more	O
+than	O
+damage	O
+control	O
+just	O
+before	O
+the	O
+elections	O
+.	O
+
+Ellison	O
+won	O
+the	O
+primary	O
+days	O
+after	O
+the	O
+allegations	O
+were	O
+made	O
+public	O
+.	O
+
+Of	O
+course	O
+,	O
+accusations	O
+does	O
+not	O
+make	O
+one	O
+guilty	O
+for	O
+Ellison	O
+anymore	O
+than	O
+they	O
+do	O
+for	O
+Judge	O
+Kavanaugh	O
+.	O
+
+However	O
+,	O
+at	O
+least	O
+in	O
+the	O
+case	O
+of	O
+Ellison	O
+,	O
+at	O
+least	O
+one	O
+of	O
+the	O
+women	O
+were	O
+not	O
+scared	O
+about	O
+their	O
+reputation	O
+and	O
+had	O
+any	O
+political	O
+motive	O
+to	O
+call	O
+the	O
+police	O
+and	O
+file	O
+a	O
+report	O
+.	O
+
+When	O
+it	O
+comes	O
+to	O
+Ellison	O
+though	O
+,	O
+we	O
+know	O
+he	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+an	I-PROP
+effeminate	I-PROP
+pansy	I-PROP
+who	I-PROP
+simply	I-PROP
+does	I-PROP
+not	I-PROP
+want	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+answer	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+and	O
+even	O
+seeks	O
+security	O
+to	O
+hide	O
+from	O
+a	O
+female	O
+report	O
+with	O
+a	O
+mic	O
+and	O
+a	O
+camera	O
+.	O
+
+Judge	O
+Kavanaugh	O
+has	O
+faced	O
+it	O
+all	O
+and	O
+fought	O
+back	O
+against	O
+it	O
+.	O
+
+Star	O
+Tribune	O
+Sues	O
+To	O
+Unseal	O
+Accused	O
+Serial	B-PROP
+Woman	I-PROP
+Abuser	I-PROP
+Keith	O
+Ellison	O
+'s	O
+Divorce	O
+Records	O
+
+Flashback	O
+in	O
+2004	O
+,	O
+when	O
+up	O
+until	O
+then	O
+,	O
+Barack	O
+Obama	O
+could	O
+n’t	O
+win	O
+an	O
+election	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+during	O
+his	O
+2004	O
+campaign	O
+for	O
+the	O
+Senate	O
+,	O
+Obama	O
+and	O
+his	O
+corrupt	B-PROP
+party	I-PROP
+in	O
+Chicago	O
+somehow	O
+managed	O
+to	O
+unseal	O
+the	O
+divorce	O
+records	O
+of	O
+his	O
+opponent	O
+Jack	O
+Ryan	O
+,	O
+who	O
+was	O
+leading	O
+by	O
+a	O
+large	O
+margin	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Ryan	O
+divorce	O
+records	O
+were	O
+sealed	O
+at	O
+their	O
+mutual	O
+request	O
+of	O
+both	O
+Mr.	O
+and	O
+Mrs.	O
+Ryan	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+the	B-PROP
+Democrat	I-PROP
+machine	I-PROP
+got	O
+them	O
+unsealed	O
+anyway	O
+.	O
+
+Barack	O
+Obama	O
+’s	O
+backers	O
+emailed	O
+reporters	O
+about	O
+the	O
+divorce	O
+controversy	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+divorce	O
+records	O
+were	O
+not	O
+pretty	O
+.	O
+
+Ryan	O
+resigned	O
+.	O
+
+Obama	O
+took	O
+the	O
+field	O
+.	O
+
+Different	O
+rules	O
+for	O
+the	O
+lawless	B-PROP
+party	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+STAR	O
+TRIBUNE	O
+SUES	O
+TO	O
+UNSEAL	O
+U.S.	O
+REP	O
+.	O
+KEITH	O
+ELLISON	O
+’S	O
+DIVORCE	O
+RECORDS	O
+
+By	O
+Jesse	O
+Van	O
+Berkel	O
+,	O
+Star	O
+Tribune	O
+,	O
+September	O
+26	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+:	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+John	O
+Bolton	O
+Richard	O
+Grenell	O
+Dina	O
+Powell	O
+Heather	O
+Nauert	O
+Ivanka	O
+Trump	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Email	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Freedom	O
+Outpost	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Star	O
+Tribune	O
+has	O
+joined	O
+a	O
+legal	O
+effort	O
+to	O
+unseal	O
+the	O
+divorce	O
+records	O
+of	O
+U.S.	O
+Rep.	O
+Keith	O
+Ellison	O
+,	O
+the	O
+Democratic	O
+candidate	O
+for	O
+attorney	O
+general	O
+.	O
+
+Ellison	O
+and	O
+his	O
+ex	O
+-	O
+wife	O
+,	O
+Kim	O
+Ellison	O
+,	O
+divorced	O
+in	O
+2012	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+related	O
+records	O
+have	O
+been	O
+sealed	O
+,	O
+so	O
+the	O
+public	O
+can	O
+not	O
+access	O
+the	O
+information	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Star	O
+Tribune	O
+’s	O
+motion	O
+to	O
+intervene	O
+and	O
+unseal	O
+the	O
+records	O
+follows	O
+a	O
+similar	O
+action	O
+by	O
+Alpha	O
+News	O
+,	O
+a	O
+right	O
+-	O
+leaning	O
+online	O
+news	O
+and	O
+opinion	O
+site	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+efforts	O
+follow	O
+allegations	O
+by	O
+Ellison	O
+’s	O
+ex	O
+-	O
+girlfriend	O
+,	O
+Karen	O
+Monahan	O
+,	O
+that	O
+Ellison	O
+domestically	O
+abused	O
+her	O
+in	O
+2016	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+has	O
+denied	O
+the	O
+allegation	O
+repeatedly	O
+,	O
+and	O
+Monahan	O
+has	O
+continued	O
+to	O
+press	O
+her	O
+case	O
+in	O
+frequent	O
+tweets	O
+about	O
+Ellison	O
+.	O
+
+On	O
+Sunday	O
+,	O
+Monahan	O
+tweeted	O
+to	O
+Ellison	O
+:	O
+“	O
+This	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+not	I-PROP
+going	I-PROP
+away	I-PROP
+and	O
+you	B-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+making	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+worse	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+you	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+your	I-PROP
+family	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+district	I-PROP
+by	I-PROP
+lying	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+smearing	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+getting	I-PROP
+others	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+your	I-PROP
+dirty	I-PROP
+work	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+victim	I-PROP
+shaming	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+etc	I-PROP
+.	O
+”	O
+She	O
+referred	O
+again	O
+to	O
+a	O
+video	O
+she	O
+says	O
+she	O
+has	O
+of	O
+Ellison	O
+dragging	O
+her	O
+off	O
+a	O
+bed	O
+,	O
+which	O
+he	O
+has	O
+said	O
+did	O
+not	O
+happen	O
+.	O
+
+She	O
+has	O
+declined	O
+to	O
+show	O
+the	O
+video	O
+,	O
+saying	O
+it	O
+is	O
+traumatizing	O
+.	O
+
+She	O
+also	O
+told	O
+CNN	O
+she	O
+misplaced	O
+it	O
+.	O
+
+Monahan	O
+also	O
+recently	O
+released	O
+a	O
+medical	O
+record	O
+that	O
+shows	O
+she	O
+told	O
+a	O
+doctor	O
+in	O
+2017	O
+that	O
+she	O
+had	O
+been	O
+in	O
+an	O
+abusive	B-PROP
+relationship	O
+with	O
+Ellison	O
+.	O
+
+Ken	O
+Martin	O
+,	O
+the	O
+chairman	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Minnesota	O
+DFL	O
+,	O
+said	O
+Tuesday	O
+that	O
+the	O
+party	O
+’s	O
+investigation	O
+of	O
+the	O
+allegations	O
+against	O
+Ellison	O
+will	O
+be	O
+finished	O
+soon	O
+,	O
+then	O
+released	O
+to	O
+the	O
+public	O
+.	O
+
+An	O
+external	O
+investigator	O
+was	O
+hired	O
+to	O
+conduct	O
+the	O
+inquiry	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Star	O
+Tribune	O
+argued	O
+that	O
+,	O
+given	O
+the	O
+public	O
+interest	O
+around	O
+that	O
+situation	O
+and	O
+Kim	O
+Ellison	O
+’s	O
+public	O
+support	O
+of	O
+her	O
+ex	O
+-	O
+husband	O
+,	O
+the	O
+divorce	O
+records	O
+are	O
+a	O
+matter	O
+of	O
+concern	O
+to	O
+voters	O
+.	O
+
+Divorce	O
+records	O
+are	O
+typically	O
+public	O
+,	O
+but	O
+judges	O
+will	O
+often	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+seal	O
+them	O
+if	O
+both	O
+parties	O
+to	O
+the	O
+case	O
+agree	O
+and	O
+no	O
+one	O
+else	O
+objects	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Ellison	O
+campaign	O
+released	O
+a	O
+statement	O
+from	O
+Kim	O
+Ellison	O
+on	O
+behalf	O
+of	O
+both	O
+her	O
+and	O
+Keith	O
+Ellison	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Our	O
+divorce	O
+simply	O
+is	O
+n’t	O
+the	O
+public	O
+’s	O
+business	O
+,	O
+and	O
+therefore	O
+,	O
+when	O
+we	O
+separated	O
+,	O
+we	O
+jointly	O
+asked	O
+the	O
+court	O
+to	O
+seal	O
+the	O
+file	O
+.	O
+
+Now	O
+,	O
+one	O
+month	O
+before	O
+a	O
+closely	O
+contested	O
+election	O
+for	O
+Minnesota	O
+Attorney	O
+General	O
+,	O
+a	O
+conservative	O
+group	O
+wants	O
+to	O
+probe	O
+our	O
+divorce	O
+file	O
+in	O
+search	O
+of	O
+something	O
+to	O
+use	O
+against	O
+Keith	O
+in	O
+this	O
+race	O
+.	O
+
+I	O
+am	O
+disappointed	O
+that	O
+the	O
+Star	O
+Tribune	O
+would	O
+choose	O
+to	O
+file	O
+this	O
+motion	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Why	O
+the	B-PROP
+Coordinated	I-PROP
+Alternative	I-PROP
+Media	I-PROP
+Purge	I-PROP
+Should	I-PROP
+TERRIFY	I-PROP
+Everyone	I-PROP
+:	O
+Soon	B-PROP
+Those	I-PROP
+Who	I-PROP
+Hate	I-PROP
+Freedom	I-PROP
+Will	I-PROP
+Have	I-PROP
+Unquestioned	I-PROP
+Access	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+Minds	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+2	I-PROP
+Billion	I-PROP
+People	I-PROP
+
+Yesterday	O
+,	O
+the	B-PROP
+alternative	I-PROP
+media	I-PROP
+purge	I-PROP
+was	O
+boldly	O
+advanced	O
+in	O
+a	O
+coordinated	O
+effort	O
+to	O
+silence	O
+people	O
+who	O
+dissent	O
+from	O
+establishment	O
+views	O
+.	O
+
+It	B-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+just	I-PROP
+one	I-PROP
+more	I-PROP
+step	I-PROP
+toward	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+monopoly	I-PROP
+on	I-PROP
+information	I-PROP
+by	I-PROP
+those	I-PROP
+who	I-PROP
+hate	I-PROP
+freedom	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+At	O
+this	O
+rate	O
+,	O
+they	O
+’ll	O
+soon	O
+have	O
+unquestioned	O
+access	O
+to	O
+the	O
+minds	O
+of	O
+more	O
+than	O
+2	O
+billion	O
+people	O
+.	O
+
+And	O
+this	O
+should	O
+terrify	B-PROP
+everyone	O
+who	O
+wants	O
+to	O
+be	O
+free	O
+to	O
+question	O
+the	O
+status	O
+quo	O
+and	O
+to	O
+seek	O
+a	O
+wide	O
+range	O
+of	O
+information	O
+.	O
+
+Hundreds	O
+of	O
+alternative	O
+media	O
+site	O
+administrators	O
+logged	O
+onto	O
+Facebook	O
+to	O
+discover	O
+that	O
+their	O
+accounts	O
+had	O
+been	O
+removed	O
+.	O
+
+Soon	O
+after	O
+,	O
+many	O
+of	O
+these	O
+sites	O
+and	O
+their	O
+writers	O
+found	O
+that	O
+their	O
+Twitter	O
+accounts	O
+had	O
+also	O
+been	O
+suspended	O
+.	O
+
+Popular	O
+pages	O
+like	O
+The	O
+AntiMedia	O
+(	O
+2.1	O
+million	O
+fans	O
+)	O
+,	O
+The	O
+Free	O
+Thought	O
+Project	O
+(	O
+3.1	O
+million	O
+fans	O
+)	O
+,	O
+Press	O
+for	O
+Truth	O
+(	O
+350	O
+K	O
+fans	O
+)	O
+,	O
+Police	O
+the	O
+Police	O
+(	O
+1.9	O
+million	O
+fans	O
+)	O
+,	O
+Cop	O
+Block	O
+(	O
+1.7	O
+million	O
+fans	O
+)	O
+,	O
+and	O
+Punk	O
+Rock	O
+Libertarians	O
+(	O
+125	O
+K	O
+fans	O
+)	O
+are	O
+just	O
+a	O
+few	O
+of	O
+the	O
+ones	O
+which	O
+were	O
+unpublished	O
+.	O
+
+Why	B-PROP
+were	I-PROP
+these	I-PROP
+alternative	I-PROP
+media	I-PROP
+accounts	I-PROP
+removed	I-PROP
+?	I-PROP
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+John	O
+Bolton	O
+Richard	O
+Grenell	O
+Dina	O
+Powell	O
+Heather	O
+Nauert	O
+Ivanka	O
+Trump	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Phone	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Freedom	O
+Outpost	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+reason	O
+given	O
+does	O
+n’t	O
+really	O
+add	O
+up	O
+.	O
+
+Facebook	O
+told	O
+the	O
+LA	O
+Times	O
+that	O
+these	O
+pages	O
+had	O
+violated	O
+the	O
+company	O
+’s	O
+spam	O
+policies	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Today	O
+,	O
+we	O
+’re	O
+removing	O
+559	O
+Pages	O
+and	O
+251	O
+accounts	O
+that	O
+have	O
+consistently	O
+broken	O
+our	O
+rules	O
+against	O
+spam	O
+and	O
+coordinated	O
+inauthentic	O
+behavior	O
+,	O
+”	O
+the	O
+company	O
+said	O
+in	O
+a	O
+blog	O
+post	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+People	O
+will	O
+only	O
+share	O
+on	O
+Facebook	O
+if	O
+they	O
+feel	O
+safe	O
+and	O
+trust	O
+the	O
+connections	O
+they	O
+make	O
+here	O
+.	O
+”	O
+(	O
+source	O
+)	O
+
+But	O
+this	O
+is	O
+n’t	O
+actually	O
+what	O
+their	O
+spam	O
+policy	O
+says	O
+.	O
+
+Here	O
+’s	O
+the	O
+policy	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+work	O
+hard	O
+to	O
+limit	O
+the	O
+spread	O
+of	O
+commercial	O
+spam	O
+to	O
+prevent	O
+false	O
+advertising	O
+,	O
+fraud	O
+,	O
+and	O
+security	O
+breaches	O
+,	O
+all	O
+of	O
+which	O
+detract	O
+from	O
+people	O
+’s	O
+ability	O
+to	O
+share	O
+and	O
+connect	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+do	O
+not	O
+allow	O
+people	O
+to	O
+use	O
+misleading	O
+or	O
+inaccurate	O
+information	O
+to	O
+collect	O
+likes	O
+,	O
+followers	O
+,	O
+or	O
+shares	O
+.	O
+
+Do	O
+Not	O
+:	O
+Artificially	O
+increase	O
+distribution	O
+for	O
+financial	O
+gain	O
+
+Create	O
+or	O
+use	O
+fake	O
+accounts	O
+or	O
+compromise	O
+other	O
+people	O
+’s	O
+accounts	O
+to	O
+
+Impersonate	O
+or	O
+pretend	O
+to	O
+be	O
+a	O
+business	O
+,	O
+organization	O
+,	O
+public	O
+figure	O
+,	O
+or	O
+private	O
+individual	O
+
+Attempt	O
+to	O
+create	O
+connections	O
+,	O
+create	O
+content	O
+,	O
+or	O
+message	O
+people	O
+
+Restrict	O
+access	O
+to	O
+content	O
+by	O
+requiring	O
+people	O
+to	O
+like	O
+,	O
+share	O
+,	O
+or	O
+recommend	O
+before	O
+viewing	O
+
+Encourage	O
+likes	O
+,	O
+shares	O
+,	O
+or	O
+clicks	O
+under	O
+false	O
+pretenses	O
+
+Maliciously	O
+use	O
+login	O
+credentials	O
+or	O
+personally	O
+identifiable	O
+information	O
+by	O
+:	O
+
+Attempting	O
+to	O
+gather	O
+or	O
+share	O
+login	O
+credentials	O
+or	O
+personally	O
+identifiable	O
+information	O
+
+Using	O
+another	O
+person	O
+’s	O
+login	O
+credentials	O
+or	O
+personally	O
+identifiable	O
+information	O
+
+Promise	O
+non	O
+-	O
+existent	O
+Facebook	O
+features	O
+(	O
+source	O
+)	O
+
+The	O
+Washington	O
+Post	O
+originally	O
+said	O
+that	O
+these	O
+pages	O
+were	O
+purged	O
+for	O
+“	O
+pushing	O
+political	O
+messages	O
+for	O
+profit	O
+”	O
+as	O
+you	O
+can	O
+see	O
+by	O
+their	O
+URL	O
+:	O
+
+https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2018/10/11/facebook-purged-over-accounts-pages-pushing-political-messages-profit/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.fa1a364488b3	O
+
+But	O
+of	O
+course	O
+,	O
+since	O
+they	O
+too	O
+push	O
+political	O
+messages	O
+for	O
+profit	O
+(	O
+waaah	B-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+Trump	I-PROP
+!	O
+)	O
+
+as	O
+do	O
+all	O
+the	O
+other	O
+corporate	O
+media	O
+outlets	O
+out	O
+there	O
+,	O
+they	O
+changed	O
+their	O
+headline	O
+to	O
+“	O
+Facebook	O
+purged	B-PROP
+over	I-PROP
+800	O
+U.S.	O
+accounts	O
+and	O
+pages	O
+for	O
+pushing	B-PROP
+political	I-PROP
+spam	I-PROP
+.	O
+”	O
+
+The	O
+fact	O
+that	O
+many	O
+of	O
+these	O
+accounts	O
+were	O
+also	O
+suspended	O
+by	O
+Twitter	O
+shortly	O
+thereafter	O
+should	O
+tell	O
+you	O
+that	O
+this	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+coordinated	I-PROP
+effort	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+silence	I-PROP
+large	I-PROP
+swaths	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+population	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Of	B-PROP
+course	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+best	I-PROP
+coverage	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+this	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+from	I-PROP
+…	I-PROP
+Russia	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+Sputnik	O
+News	O
+contacted	O
+many	O
+of	O
+the	O
+alternative	O
+journalists	O
+who	O
+were	O
+purged	O
+to	O
+get	O
+their	O
+take	O
+on	O
+what	O
+happened	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+recall	O
+that	O
+basically	O
+every	O
+blogger	O
+outside	O
+the	O
+establishment	O
+media	O
+was	O
+accused	O
+of	O
+being	O
+secretly	B-PROP
+Russian	I-PROP
+during	O
+the	O
+2016	O
+election	O
+by	O
+the	O
+Washington	O
+Post	O
+,	O
+so	O
+perhaps	O
+actual	O
+Russians	O
+have	O
+a	O
+vested	O
+interest	O
+in	O
+the	O
+truth	O
+coming	O
+out	O
+on	O
+this	O
+topic	O
+.	O
+
+My	O
+friend	O
+John	O
+Vibes	O
+is	O
+an	B-PROP
+amazing	I-PROP
+person	I-PROP
+who	O
+contributes	O
+to	O
+The	O
+Free	O
+Thought	O
+Project	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+said	O
+:	O
+
+This	O
+signifies	O
+a	O
+re	O
+-	O
+consolidation	O
+of	O
+the	O
+media	O
+.	O
+
+Cable	O
+news	O
+media	O
+controlled	O
+the	O
+narrative	O
+for	O
+most	O
+of	O
+modern	O
+history	O
+,	O
+but	O
+the	O
+internet	O
+has	O
+lowered	O
+that	O
+barrier	O
+to	O
+entry	O
+and	O
+allowed	O
+the	O
+average	O
+person	O
+to	O
+become	O
+the	O
+media	O
+themselves	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+obviously	O
+took	O
+market	O
+share	O
+and	O
+influence	O
+away	O
+from	O
+the	O
+traditional	O
+media	O
+,	O
+and	O
+it	O
+has	O
+allowed	O
+for	O
+a	O
+more	O
+diverse	O
+public	O
+conversation	O
+.	O
+
+Now	O
+it	O
+seems	O
+the	O
+platforms	O
+that	O
+have	O
+monopolized	O
+the	O
+industry	O
+are	O
+favoring	O
+mainstream	O
+sources	O
+and	O
+silencing	O
+alternative	O
+voices	O
+.	O
+
+So	O
+now	O
+,	O
+instead	O
+of	O
+allowing	O
+more	O
+people	O
+to	O
+have	O
+a	O
+voice	O
+,	O
+these	O
+platforms	O
+are	O
+creating	O
+an	O
+atmosphere	O
+where	O
+only	O
+powerful	O
+media	O
+organizations	O
+are	O
+welcome	O
+,	O
+just	O
+as	O
+we	O
+had	O
+on	O
+cable	O
+news	O
+.	O
+
+People	O
+think	O
+that	O
+we	O
+are	O
+just	O
+providing	O
+an	O
+activist	O
+spin	O
+on	O
+the	O
+news	O
+,	O
+but	O
+they	O
+do	O
+n’t	O
+see	O
+the	O
+families	O
+struggling	O
+to	O
+have	O
+their	O
+voice	O
+heard	O
+.	O
+
+For	O
+example	O
+,	O
+when	O
+someone	O
+is	O
+shot	O
+by	O
+police	O
+,	O
+mainstream	O
+media	O
+sources	O
+often	O
+just	O
+republish	O
+the	O
+press	O
+release	O
+from	O
+the	O
+police	O
+department	O
+,	O
+without	O
+presenting	O
+the	O
+victim	O
+’s	O
+side	O
+of	O
+the	O
+story	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+give	O
+the	O
+victims	O
+and	O
+their	O
+families	O
+a	O
+voice	O
+,	O
+which	O
+is	O
+essential	O
+to	O
+keep	O
+power	O
+in	O
+check	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+also	O
+goes	O
+for	O
+bigger	O
+issues	O
+like	O
+foreign	O
+policy	O
+as	O
+well	O
+;	O
+multiple	O
+full	O
+-	O
+scale	O
+invasions	O
+of	O
+Syria	O
+have	O
+been	O
+prevented	O
+because	O
+of	O
+information	O
+that	O
+the	O
+alternative	O
+media	O
+made	O
+viral	O
+.	O
+
+(	O
+source	O
+)	O
+
+Nicholas	O
+Bernabe	O
+of	O
+The	O
+AntiMedia	O
+is	O
+another	O
+alternative	O
+journalist	O
+I	O
+consider	O
+a	O
+friend	O
+and	O
+support	O
+wholeheartedly	B-PROP
+.	O
+
+He	B-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+worked	I-PROP
+tirelessly	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+voice	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+truth	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+world	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+lies	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+He	O
+told	O
+Sputnik	O
+:	O
+
+Our	O
+approach	O
+generally	O
+is	O
+to	O
+cover	O
+stories	O
+and	O
+angles	O
+that	O
+corporate	O
+media	O
+underreport	O
+or	O
+misreport	O
+and	O
+to	O
+amplify	O
+activist	O
+and	O
+anti	O
+-	O
+war	O
+voices	O
+and	O
+stories	O
+.	O
+
+All	O
+of	O
+our	O
+content	O
+is	O
+professionally	O
+fact	O
+-	O
+checked	O
+and	O
+edited	O
+.	O
+
+I	O
+got	O
+into	O
+this	O
+line	O
+of	O
+work	O
+because	O
+I	O
+felt	O
+there	O
+was	O
+a	O
+need	O
+for	O
+media	O
+that	O
+challenged	O
+mainstream	O
+assumptions	O
+and	O
+biases	O
+in	O
+politics	O
+.	O
+
+I	O
+wanted	O
+to	O
+shed	O
+light	O
+on	O
+corruption	O
+and	O
+wrongdoing	O
+against	O
+oppressed	O
+peoples	O
+and	O
+cover	O
+the	O
+harsh	B-PROP
+truth	O
+about	O
+American	O
+foreign	O
+policy	O
+.	O
+
+Over	O
+the	O
+last	O
+28	O
+days	O
+,	O
+we	O
+reached	O
+7,088,000	O
+people	O
+on	O
+Facebook	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+timing	O
+of	O
+this	O
+purge	O
+is	O
+rather	O
+dubious	O
+in	O
+my	O
+view	O
+,	O
+coming	O
+shortly	O
+before	O
+the	O
+midterm	O
+elections	O
+.	O
+
+This	B-PROP
+could	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+an	I-PROP
+attempt	I-PROP
+by	I-PROP
+Facebook	I-PROP
+itself	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+affect	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+outcome	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+coming	I-PROP
+elections	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Twitter	O
+suspension	O
+caught	O
+me	O
+by	O
+surprise	O
+.	O
+
+I	B-PROP
+can	I-PROP
+only	I-PROP
+speculate	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+these	I-PROP
+suspensions	I-PROP
+were	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+coordinated	I-PROP
+effort	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+stifle	I-PROP
+our	I-PROP
+message	I-PROP
+ahead	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+coming	I-PROP
+elections	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+(	O
+source	O
+)	O
+
+Remember	O
+,	O
+this	O
+is	O
+coordinated	O
+,	O
+across	O
+multiple	O
+platforms	O
+.	O
+
+Remember	O
+when	O
+this	O
+happened	O
+to	O
+Alex	O
+Jones	O
+?	O
+
+Back	O
+in	O
+September	O
+,	O
+an	O
+assault	B-PROP
+was	O
+led	O
+by	O
+YouTube	O
+,	O
+Google	O
+,	O
+and	O
+Facebook	O
+against	O
+Alex	O
+Jones	O
+of	O
+Infowars	O
+fame	O
+.	O
+
+All	O
+of	O
+his	O
+accounts	O
+were	O
+shut	O
+down	O
+in	O
+quick	O
+succession	O
+,	O
+followed	O
+by	O
+his	O
+credit	O
+card	O
+processing	O
+companies	O
+and	O
+his	O
+newsletter	O
+service	O
+providers	O
+.	O
+
+I	O
+wrote	O
+at	O
+the	O
+time	O
+,	O
+“	O
+Alex	O
+Jones	O
+is	O
+just	O
+the	O
+beginning	O
+of	O
+this	O
+purge	O
+.	O
+
+It	B-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+going	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+get	I-PROP
+much	I-PROP
+worse	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+”	O
+
+Meanwhile	O
+,	O
+other	O
+dissenting	O
+voices	O
+were	O
+being	O
+silenced	O
+on	O
+social	O
+media	O
+with	O
+limited	O
+reach	O
+and	O
+“	O
+shadow	O
+banning	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Infowars	O
+is	O
+a	B-PROP
+massive	I-PROP
+profit	I-PROP
+machine	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+But	O
+what	O
+happens	O
+when	O
+similar	O
+attacks	B-PROP
+are	O
+launched	O
+on	O
+smaller	O
+alternative	O
+media	O
+outlets	O
+?	O
+
+It	O
+hits	O
+us	O
+right	O
+in	O
+the	O
+wallet	O
+.	O
+
+And	O
+if	O
+they	O
+’re	O
+hit	O
+hard	O
+enough	O
+,	O
+they	O
+’ll	O
+cease	O
+to	O
+be	O
+able	O
+to	O
+function	O
+.	O
+
+Jones	O
+has	O
+a	O
+lot	O
+of	O
+money	O
+so	O
+this	O
+may	O
+not	O
+be	O
+the	O
+end	O
+of	O
+him	O
+,	O
+but	O
+for	O
+most	O
+website	O
+owners	O
+,	O
+this	O
+would	O
+be	O
+the	O
+absolute	O
+end	O
+of	O
+our	O
+ability	O
+to	O
+do	O
+business	O
+.	O
+
+And	O
+to	O
+be	O
+able	O
+to	O
+bring	O
+the	O
+information	O
+we	O
+bring	O
+,	O
+we	O
+do	O
+have	O
+to	O
+run	O
+our	O
+websites	O
+as	O
+businesses	O
+.	O
+
+It	O
+’s	O
+far	O
+more	O
+expensive	O
+than	O
+most	O
+people	O
+realize	O
+to	O
+run	O
+a	O
+site	O
+.	O
+
+I	O
+know	O
+that	O
+my	O
+own	O
+operating	O
+costs	O
+every	O
+month	O
+are	O
+more	O
+than	O
+$	O
+2000	O
+.	O
+
+A	O
+site	O
+as	O
+big	O
+as	O
+Jones	O
+’s	O
+would	O
+be	O
+many	O
+times	O
+that	O
+amount	O
+.	O
+
+When	O
+all	O
+your	O
+avenues	O
+of	O
+monetization	O
+are	O
+cut	O
+off	O
+,	O
+it	O
+would	O
+n’t	O
+be	O
+hard	O
+for	O
+a	O
+site	O
+–	O
+and	O
+the	O
+dissent	O
+and	O
+information	O
+they	O
+share	O
+–	O
+to	O
+cease	O
+to	O
+exist	O
+.	O
+
+(	O
+source	O
+)	O
+
+This	O
+is	O
+not	O
+just	O
+about	O
+Facebook	O
+or	O
+Twitter	O
+.	O
+
+It	O
+’s	O
+about	O
+the	O
+ability	O
+to	O
+find	O
+dissenting	O
+information	O
+,	O
+period	O
+.	O
+
+Google	O
+is	O
+in	O
+on	O
+it	O
+too	O
+.	O
+
+A	O
+leaked	O
+document	O
+from	O
+Google	O
+supported	O
+the	O
+idea	O
+of	O
+censorship	O
+.	O
+
+Another	O
+Google	O
+document	O
+has	O
+found	O
+its	O
+way	O
+into	O
+the	O
+public	O
+domain	O
+,	O
+this	O
+time	O
+through	O
+Breitbart	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+news	O
+publication	O
+reports	O
+that	O
+an	O
+85-page	O
+briefing	O
+entitled	O
+“	O
+The	O
+Good	O
+Censor	O
+,	O
+”	O
+advises	O
+tech	O
+companies	O
+to	O
+“	O
+police	O
+tone	O
+instead	O
+of	O
+content	O
+”	O
+and	O
+to	O
+not	O
+“	O
+take	O
+sides	O
+”	O
+when	O
+censoring	O
+users	O
+…	O
+Google	O
+might	O
+continue	O
+to	O
+shift	O
+with	O
+the	O
+times	O
+–	O
+changing	O
+its	O
+stance	O
+on	O
+how	O
+much	O
+or	O
+how	O
+little	O
+it	O
+censors	O
+(	O
+due	O
+to	O
+public	O
+,	O
+governmental	O
+or	O
+commercial	O
+pressures	O
+)	O
+.	O
+
+If	O
+it	O
+does	O
+,	O
+acknowledgment	O
+of	O
+what	O
+this	O
+shift	O
+in	O
+position	O
+means	O
+for	O
+users	O
+and	O
+for	O
+Google	O
+is	O
+essential	O
+.	O
+
+Shifting	O
+blindly	O
+or	O
+silently	O
+in	O
+one	O
+direction	O
+or	O
+another	O
+rightly	O
+incites	O
+users	O
+’	O
+fury	O
+…	O
+The	O
+Google	O
+“	O
+internal	O
+research	O
+”	O
+even	O
+quotes	O
+outside	O
+experts	O
+like	O
+George	O
+Soros	O
+who	O
+express	O
+justification	O
+of	O
+censorship	O
+in	O
+non	O
+-	O
+U.S.	O
+markets	O
+,	O
+noting	O
+that	O
+Google	O
+should	O
+police	O
+“	O
+tone	O
+instead	O
+of	O
+content	O
+”	O
+and	O
+“	O
+censor	O
+everyone	O
+equally	O
+,	O
+”	O
+as	O
+Breitbart	O
+put	O
+it	O
+.	O
+
+(	O
+source	O
+)	O
+
+There	O
+are	O
+2	O
+trillion	O
+Google	O
+searches	O
+per	O
+day	O
+.	O
+
+PER	O
+.	O
+
+DAY	O
+.	O
+
+That	O
+should	O
+give	O
+you	O
+an	O
+idea	O
+of	O
+the	O
+power	O
+of	O
+something	O
+like	O
+Google	O
+.	O
+
+Combine	O
+it	O
+with	O
+billions	O
+of	O
+Facebook	O
+and	O
+Twitter	O
+users	O
+and	O
+you	O
+can	O
+easily	O
+see	O
+the	O
+influence	O
+wielded	O
+here	O
+.	O
+
+This	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+where	I-PROP
+free	I-PROP
+thought	I-PROP
+goes	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+die	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+Ron	O
+Paul	O
+reminds	O
+us	O
+that	O
+truth	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+treason	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Ron	O
+Paul	O
+,	O
+former	O
+senator	O
+and	O
+the	O
+libertarian	B-PROP
+voice	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+reason	I-PROP
+,	O
+said	O
+when	O
+Jones	O
+was	O
+purged	O
+:	O
+
+“	O
+You	O
+get	O
+accused	O
+of	O
+treasonous	B-PROP
+activity	O
+and	O
+treasonous	B-PROP
+speech	O
+because	O
+in	B-PROP
+an	I-PROP
+empire	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+lies	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+truth	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+treason	I-PROP
+,	O
+”	O
+Paul	O
+told	O
+the	O
+Russia	O
+-	O
+based	O
+news	O
+outlet	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Challenging	O
+the	O
+status	O
+quo	O
+is	O
+what	O
+they	O
+ca	O
+n’t	O
+stand	O
+and	O
+it	O
+unnerves	O
+them	O
+,	O
+so	O
+they	O
+have	O
+to	O
+silence	O
+people	O
+.	O
+”	O
+“	O
+Some	O
+of	O
+us	O
+tell	O
+the	O
+truth	O
+about	O
+our	O
+government	O
+,	O
+they	O
+call	O
+us	O
+treasonous	B-PROP
+and	O
+say	O
+we	O
+’re	O
+speaking	O
+out	O
+of	O
+line	O
+and	O
+they	O
+’d	O
+like	O
+to	O
+punish	O
+us	O
+,	O
+and	O
+I	O
+think	O
+that	O
+’s	O
+part	O
+of	O
+what	O
+’s	O
+happening	O
+with	O
+social	O
+media	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Paul	O
+told	O
+RT	O
+,	O
+adding	O
+that	O
+he	O
+hopes	O
+anti	O
+-	O
+government	O
+or	O
+anti	O
+-	O
+war	O
+voices	O
+can	O
+eliminate	O
+their	O
+“	O
+dependency	O
+”	O
+on	O
+the	O
+current	O
+social	O
+media	O
+platforms	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+I	O
+’m	O
+just	O
+hoping	O
+that	O
+technology	O
+can	O
+stay	O
+ahead	O
+of	O
+it	O
+all	O
+and	O
+that	O
+we	O
+can	O
+have	O
+real	O
+alternatives	O
+to	O
+the	O
+dependency	O
+on	O
+Twitter	O
+and	O
+other	O
+companies	O
+that	O
+have	O
+been	O
+working	O
+hand	O
+in	O
+glove	O
+with	O
+the	O
+government	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Paul	O
+added	O
+.	O
+
+(	O
+source	O
+)	O
+
+Here	O
+’s	O
+a	O
+video	O
+from	O
+last	O
+month	O
+with	O
+Dr.	O
+Paul	O
+’s	O
+thoughts	O
+about	O
+the	O
+social	O
+media	O
+purge	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+it	O
+,	O
+he	O
+reminds	O
+us	O
+that	O
+Facebook	O
+is	O
+a	O
+private	O
+entity	O
+so	O
+they	O
+do	O
+have	O
+every	O
+right	O
+to	O
+remove	O
+the	O
+pages	O
+they	O
+wish	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+danger	O
+–	O
+and	O
+the	O
+area	O
+in	O
+which	O
+this	O
+treads	O
+on	O
+the	O
+First	O
+Amendment	O
+–	O
+is	O
+their	O
+direct	O
+ties	O
+to	O
+the	O
+government	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+affects	O
+everyone	O
+.	O
+
+If	O
+you	O
+’re	O
+reading	O
+this	O
+and	O
+you	O
+shrug	O
+because	O
+you	O
+,	O
+personally	O
+,	O
+do	O
+n’t	O
+have	O
+a	O
+Twitter	O
+or	O
+Facebook	O
+account	O
+,	O
+you	O
+’re	O
+missing	B-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+bigger	I-PROP
+point	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Consider	O
+the	O
+fact	O
+that	O
+the	O
+“	O
+population	O
+”	O
+of	O
+Facebook	O
+is	O
+bigger	O
+than	O
+the	O
+populations	O
+of	O
+the	O
+US	O
+,	O
+China	O
+,	O
+and	O
+Brazil	O
+combined	O
+.	O
+
+That	O
+’s	O
+how	O
+many	O
+people	O
+will	O
+now	O
+only	O
+receive	O
+one	O
+side	O
+of	O
+the	O
+story	O
+on	O
+things	O
+like	O
+war	O
+,	O
+politics	O
+,	O
+guns	O
+,	O
+and	O
+current	O
+events	O
+.	O
+
+People	B-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+believe	I-PROP
+what	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+’re	I-PROP
+told	I-PROP
+because	I-PROP
+there	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+no	I-PROP
+alternative	I-PROP
+information	I-PROP
+presented	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+There	O
+are	O
+no	O
+questions	O
+asked	O
+.	O
+
+It	O
+’s	O
+literally	O
+the	O
+textbook	O
+definition	O
+of	O
+brainwashing	B-PROP
+.	O
+
+Definition	O
+of	O
+brainwashing	B-PROP
+
+1	O
+:	O
+a	O
+forcible	O
+indoctrination	B-PROP
+to	O
+induce	O
+someone	O
+to	O
+give	O
+up	O
+basic	O
+political	O
+,	O
+social	O
+,	O
+or	O
+religious	O
+beliefs	O
+and	O
+attitudes	O
+and	O
+to	O
+accept	O
+contrasting	O
+regimented	O
+ideas	O
+2	O
+:	O
+persuasion	O
+by	O
+propaganda	O
+or	O
+salesmanship	O
+(	O
+source	O
+)	O
+
+(	O
+Here	O
+’s	O
+an	O
+article	O
+from	O
+Psychology	O
+Today	O
+that	O
+discusses	O
+how	O
+Facebook	O
+is	O
+,	O
+in	O
+fact	O
+,	O
+brainwashing	B-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+profit	I-PROP
+.	O
+)	O
+
+Social	O
+media	O
+is	O
+a	O
+massive	O
+source	O
+of	O
+information	O
+and	O
+influence	O
+today	O
+.	O
+
+If	B-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+information	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+rigged	I-PROP
+by	I-PROP
+entities	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+support	I-PROP
+socialism	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+gun	I-PROP
+control	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+end	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+privacy	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+we	I-PROP
+’re	I-PROP
+doomed	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+2.2	O
+billion	O
+active	O
+users	O
+will	O
+be	O
+bombarded	B-PROP
+with	O
+these	O
+messages	O
+without	O
+any	O
+real	O
+option	O
+for	O
+the	O
+other	O
+side	O
+of	O
+the	O
+story	O
+.	O
+
+So	O
+regardless	O
+of	O
+whether	O
+you	O
+,	O
+personally	O
+,	O
+participate	O
+,	O
+this	O
+will	O
+color	O
+popular	O
+sentiment	O
+to	B-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+massive	I-PROP
+degree	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+It	O
+will	O
+grow	O
+the	O
+cognitive	O
+dissonance	O
+that	O
+assures	O
+people	O
+of	O
+things	O
+like	O
+“	O
+the	B-PROP
+government	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+your	I-PROP
+friend	I-PROP
+”	O
+and	O
+that	O
+“	O
+you	O
+do	O
+n’t	O
+need	O
+to	O
+protect	O
+yourself	O
+,	O
+the	O
+police	O
+will	O
+take	O
+care	O
+of	O
+you	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+People	B-PROP
+who	I-PROP
+hate	I-PROP
+freedom	I-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+get	I-PROP
+unfettered	I-PROP
+access	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+minds	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+2	I-PROP
+billion	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+That	B-PROP
+should	I-PROP
+scare	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+crap	I-PROP
+out	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+you	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+What	O
+can	O
+you	O
+do	O
+about	O
+the	O
+alternative	B-PROP
+media	I-PROP
+purge	I-PROP
+?	O
+
+It	O
+’s	O
+possible	O
+but	O
+unlikely	O
+that	O
+social	O
+pressure	O
+on	O
+Facebook	O
+and	O
+Twitter	O
+will	O
+push	O
+the	O
+outlets	O
+into	O
+restoring	O
+the	O
+accounts	O
+of	O
+these	O
+alternative	O
+media	O
+networks	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+even	O
+if	O
+they	O
+are	O
+restored	O
+,	O
+I	O
+suspect	O
+their	O
+reach	O
+will	O
+dwindle	O
+even	O
+further	O
+.	O
+
+Here	O
+are	O
+a	O
+few	O
+things	O
+you	O
+can	O
+do	O
+:	O
+
+Subscribe	O
+to	O
+the	O
+newsletters	O
+of	O
+websites	O
+you	O
+enjoy	O
+.	O
+
+Do	O
+n’t	O
+count	O
+on	O
+seeing	O
+their	O
+work	O
+on	O
+social	O
+media	O
+.	O
+
+(	O
+You	O
+can	O
+subscribe	O
+to	O
+my	O
+newsletter	O
+here	O
+,	O
+incidentally	O
+.	O
+)	O
+
+Support	O
+them	O
+financially	O
+if	O
+you	O
+can	O
+.	O
+
+Many	O
+sites	O
+have	O
+Patreon	O
+accounts	O
+or	O
+donate	O
+buttons	O
+
+Bookmark	O
+them	O
+and	O
+visit	O
+regularly	O
+–	O
+if	O
+they	O
+have	O
+ads	O
+,	O
+your	O
+visits	O
+help	O
+them	O
+to	O
+make	O
+the	O
+money	O
+they	O
+need	O
+to	O
+stay	O
+afloat	O
+.	O
+
+Share	O
+their	O
+articles	O
+on	O
+your	O
+own	O
+social	O
+media	O
+accounts	O
+.	O
+
+If	O
+they	O
+ca	O
+n’t	O
+get	O
+their	O
+work	O
+out	O
+there	O
+,	O
+we	O
+can	O
+help	O
+.	O
+
+Join	O
+alternative	O
+social	O
+media	O
+outlets	O
+like	O
+Gab	O
+and	O
+MeWe	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+truth	O
+is	O
+getting	O
+harder	O
+and	O
+harder	O
+to	O
+find	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+’re	O
+going	O
+to	O
+have	O
+to	O
+dig	O
+for	O
+it	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+’re	O
+watching	O
+the	B-PROP
+biggest	I-PROP
+campaign	I-PROP
+against	I-PROP
+freedom	O
+of	O
+speech	O
+and	O
+thought	O
+that	O
+has	O
+ever	O
+occurred	O
+in	O
+our	O
+part	O
+of	O
+the	O
+world	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+alternative	O
+media	O
+purge	B-PROP
+is	O
+just	O
+the	O
+beginning	O
+.	O
+
+And	O
+we	O
+should	O
+all	O
+be	O
+very	O
+concerned	O
+.	O
+
+Article	O
+posted	O
+with	O
+permission	O
+from	O
+Daisy	O
+Luther	O
+
+First	O
+They	O
+Came	O
+for	O
+Alex	O
+Jones	O
+—	O
+We	O
+Told	O
+You	O
+We	O
+Were	O
+Next	O
+—	O
+We	O
+Were	O
+
+October	O
+11	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+,	O
+will	O
+be	O
+remembered	O
+in	O
+history	O
+as	O
+the	O
+day	O
+the	B-PROP
+tech	I-PROP
+giants	I-PROP
+attempted	O
+to	O
+wipe	B-PROP
+out	I-PROP
+independent	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+liberty	I-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+minded	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+antiwar	I-PROP
+media	I-PROP
+from	O
+the	O
+airwaves	O
+.	O
+
+On	O
+Thursday	O
+,	O
+in	O
+a	O
+coordinated	O
+effort	O
+,	O
+hundreds	O
+of	O
+pages	O
+devoted	O
+to	O
+peace	O
+and	O
+liberty	O
+were	O
+memory	B-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+holed	I-PROP
+by	O
+social	B-PROP
+media	I-PROP
+giants	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+As	O
+part	O
+of	O
+its	O
+purge	O
+,	O
+Facebook	O
+has	O
+removed	O
+the	O
+pages	O
+of	O
+several	O
+police	O
+accountability	O
+/	O
+watchdog	O
+/	O
+critic	O
+groups	O
+,	O
+including	O
+Cop	O
+Block	O
+,	O
+the	O
+Free	O
+Thought	O
+Project	O
+,	O
+and	O
+Police	O
+the	O
+Police	O
+.	O
+
+They	O
+'ve	O
+also	O
+apparently	O
+severely	B-PROP
+restricted	O
+activity	O
+for	O
+the	O
+Photography	O
+Is	O
+Not	O
+a	O
+Crime	O
+page	O
+.	O
+
+—	O
+Radley	O
+Balko	O
+(	O
+@radleybalko	O
+)	O
+October	O
+12	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+Who	O
+should	O
+replace	O
+Nikki	O
+Haley	O
+as	O
+our	O
+ambassador	O
+to	O
+the	O
+U.N.	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+John	O
+Bolton	O
+Richard	O
+Grenell	O
+Dina	O
+Powell	O
+Heather	O
+Nauert	O
+Ivanka	O
+Trump	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Comments	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Freedom	O
+Outpost	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+What	O
+makes	O
+this	O
+recent	O
+purge	O
+from	O
+Facebook	O
+and	O
+Twitter	O
+so	O
+egregious	O
+is	O
+that	O
+the	O
+pages	O
+like	O
+the	O
+Free	O
+Thought	O
+Project	O
+,	O
+the	O
+Anti	O
+-	O
+Media	O
+,	O
+Press	O
+for	O
+Truth	O
+,	O
+and	O
+dozens	O
+of	O
+others	O
+,	O
+did	O
+not	O
+fit	O
+the	O
+hate	O
+speech	O
+narrative	O
+these	O
+same	O
+companies	O
+used	O
+to	O
+wipe	B-PROP
+out	I-PROP
+Alex	O
+Jones	O
+.	O
+
+Instead	O
+,	O
+these	O
+pages	O
+were	O
+dedicated	O
+to	O
+spreading	O
+peace	O
+,	O
+bridging	O
+the	O
+divide	O
+,	O
+bringing	O
+humanity	O
+together	O
+and	O
+holding	O
+government	O
+accountable	O
+.	O
+
+And	O
+how	O
+does	O
+this	O
+poem	O
+end	O
+,	O
+again	O
+?	O
+
+https://t.co/nUZ82x9JFt	O
+—	O
+Anya	O
+Parampil	O
+(	O
+@anyaparampil	O
+)	O
+August	O
+6	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+The	O
+purge	O
+happened	O
+around	O
+12:30	O
+p.m.	O
+CST	O
+with	O
+mainstream	O
+news	O
+reports	O
+launching	O
+at	O
+the	O
+same	O
+time	O
+—	O
+implying	O
+that	O
+they	O
+were	O
+given	O
+the	O
+heads	O
+up	O
+about	O
+the	O
+move	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+a	O
+statement	O
+co	O
+-	O
+authored	O
+by	O
+Facebook	O
+Head	O
+of	O
+Cybersecurity	O
+Nathaniel	O
+Gleicher	O
+—	O
+who	O
+Caitlin	O
+Johnstone	O
+aptly	O
+points	O
+out	O
+,	O
+also	O
+happens	O
+to	O
+be	O
+the	O
+former	O
+White	O
+House	O
+National	O
+Security	O
+Council	O
+Director	O
+of	O
+Cybersecurity	O
+Policy	O
+—	O
+the	O
+massive	O
+social	O
+media	O
+platform	O
+explained	O
+that	O
+it	O
+has	O
+removed	O
+“	O
+559	O
+Pages	O
+and	O
+251	O
+accounts	O
+that	O
+have	O
+consistently	O
+broken	O
+our	O
+rules	O
+against	O
+spam	O
+and	O
+coordinated	O
+inauthentic	O
+behavior	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Facebook	O
+said	O
+the	O
+pages	O
+were	O
+“	O
+working	O
+to	O
+mislead	O
+others	O
+about	O
+who	O
+they	O
+are	O
+,	O
+and	O
+what	O
+they	O
+are	O
+doing	O
+.	O
+”	O
+However	B-PROP
+,	O
+this	B-PROP
+could	I-PROP
+n’t	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+further	I-PROP
+from	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+truth	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Our	O
+names	O
+,	O
+addresses	O
+,	O
+and	O
+phone	O
+numbers	O
+were	O
+on	O
+all	O
+of	O
+our	O
+pages	O
+and	O
+our	O
+profiles	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+We	O
+were	O
+verified	O
+by	O
+Facebook	O
+with	O
+a	O
+little	O
+check	O
+mark	O
+next	O
+to	O
+our	O
+name	O
+,	O
+so	O
+they	O
+know	O
+we	O
+are	O
+a	O
+legitimate	O
+organization	O
+/	O
+outlet	O
+.	O
+
+They	O
+have	O
+seen	O
+our	O
+“	O
+Articles	O
+of	O
+Organization	O
+”	O
+which	O
+was	O
+issued	O
+by	O
+the	O
+state	O
+of	O
+Louisiana	O
+,	O
+which	O
+is	O
+where	O
+my	O
+partner	O
+and	O
+The	O
+Free	O
+Thought	O
+Project	O
+co	O
+-	O
+founder	O
+lives	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Jason	O
+Bassler	O
+,	O
+co	O
+-	O
+founder	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Free	O
+Thought	O
+Project	O
+explained	O
+.	O
+
+However	O
+,	O
+in	O
+their	O
+statement	O
+,	O
+Facebook	O
+then	O
+suggested	O
+the	O
+real	O
+reason	O
+behind	O
+the	O
+purge	O
+—	O
+elections	O
+are	O
+coming	O
+—	O
+and	O
+pesky	B-PROP
+folks	I-PROP
+like	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+independent	I-PROP
+media	I-PROP
+have	O
+a	O
+way	O
+of	O
+reporting	O
+information	O
+on	O
+candidates	O
+that	O
+the	O
+mainstream	O
+tends	O
+to	O
+ignore	O
+—	O
+like	O
+war	O
+,	O
+corruption	O
+,	O
+and	O
+most	O
+recently	O
+,	O
+Brett	O
+Kavanaugh	O
+’s	O
+disdain	O
+for	O
+the	O
+Constitution	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Given	O
+the	O
+activity	O
+we	O
+’ve	O
+seen	O
+—	O
+and	O
+its	O
+timing	O
+ahead	O
+of	O
+the	O
+US	O
+midterm	O
+elections	O
+—	O
+we	O
+wanted	O
+to	O
+give	O
+some	O
+details	O
+about	O
+the	O
+types	O
+of	O
+behavior	O
+that	O
+led	O
+to	O
+this	O
+action	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Facebook	O
+said	O
+,	O
+before	O
+accusing	O
+us	O
+of	O
+hawking	O
+fake	O
+products	O
+or	O
+functioning	O
+as	O
+ad	O
+farms	O
+that	O
+tricked	O
+“	O
+people	O
+into	O
+thinking	O
+that	O
+they	O
+were	O
+forums	O
+for	O
+legitimate	O
+political	O
+debate	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+It	O
+should	O
+be	O
+stated	O
+that	O
+TFTP	O
+never	O
+hid	O
+the	O
+fact	O
+that	O
+we	O
+worked	O
+with	O
+other	O
+independent	O
+media	O
+groups	O
+to	O
+share	O
+our	O
+information	O
+around	O
+the	O
+web	O
+—	O
+this	O
+is	O
+the	O
+very	O
+definition	O
+of	O
+grassroots	B-PROP
+.	O
+
+But	O
+all	O
+of	O
+us	O
+together	O
+certainly	O
+posed	O
+a	O
+threat	O
+to	O
+the	O
+mainstream	O
+so	O
+this	O
+nonsense	B-PROP
+about	O
+tricking	O
+people	O
+was	O
+brought	O
+into	O
+play	O
+.	O
+
+Within	O
+all	O
+of	O
+our	O
+pages	O
+under	O
+the	O
+Free	O
+Thought	O
+umbrella	O
+,	O
+we	O
+had	O
+close	O
+to	O
+6	O
+million	O
+followers	O
+.	O
+
+Does	B-PROP
+Facebook	I-PROP
+think	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+knows	I-PROP
+better	I-PROP
+than	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+6	I-PROP
+million	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+who	I-PROP
+clicked	I-PROP
+like	I-PROP
+on	I-PROP
+our	I-PROP
+page	I-PROP
+?	I-PROP
+
+We	O
+also	O
+had	O
+close	O
+to	O
+16,000	O
+reviews	O
+on	O
+our	O
+page	O
+with	O
+an	O
+average	O
+4.1	O
+star	O
+rating	O
+,	O
+directly	O
+showing	O
+that	O
+people	O
+desired	O
+to	O
+see	O
+what	O
+we	O
+were	O
+putting	O
+out	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+only	O
+ones	O
+manipulating	O
+people	O
+here	O
+are	O
+the	O
+tech	B-PROP
+giants	I-PROP
+themselves	O
+.	O
+
+All	O
+but	O
+proving	O
+the	O
+case	O
+that	O
+this	O
+was	O
+a	O
+coordinated	O
+attack	O
+by	O
+the	O
+tech	O
+giant	O
+community	O
+,	O
+shortly	O
+after	O
+the	O
+purge	O
+on	O
+Facebook	O
+,	O
+Twitter	O
+followed	O
+suit	O
+,	O
+wiping	B-PROP
+out	O
+our	O
+profiles	O
+on	O
+there	O
+as	O
+well	O
+.	O
+
+They	B-PROP
+gave	I-PROP
+absolutely	I-PROP
+no	I-PROP
+reason	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+suspension	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+“	O
+This	O
+signifies	O
+a	O
+re	O
+-	O
+consolidation	O
+of	O
+the	O
+media	O
+.	O
+
+Cable	O
+news	O
+media	O
+controlled	O
+the	O
+narrative	O
+for	O
+most	O
+of	O
+modern	O
+history	O
+,	O
+but	O
+the	O
+internet	O
+has	O
+lowered	O
+that	O
+barrier	O
+to	O
+entry	O
+and	O
+allowed	O
+the	O
+average	O
+person	O
+to	O
+become	O
+the	O
+media	O
+themselves	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+obviously	O
+took	O
+market	O
+share	O
+and	O
+influence	O
+away	O
+from	O
+the	O
+traditional	O
+media	O
+,	O
+and	O
+it	O
+has	O
+allowed	O
+for	O
+a	O
+more	O
+diverse	O
+public	O
+conversation	O
+.	O
+
+Now	O
+it	O
+seems	O
+the	O
+platforms	O
+that	O
+have	O
+monopolized	O
+the	O
+industry	O
+are	O
+favoring	O
+mainstream	O
+sources	O
+and	O
+silencing	O
+alternative	O
+voices	O
+.	O
+
+So	O
+now	O
+,	O
+instead	O
+of	O
+allowing	O
+more	O
+people	O
+to	O
+have	O
+a	O
+voice	O
+,	O
+these	O
+platforms	O
+are	O
+creating	O
+an	O
+atmosphere	O
+where	O
+only	O
+powerful	O
+media	O
+organizations	O
+are	O
+welcome	O
+,	O
+just	O
+as	O
+we	O
+had	O
+on	O
+cable	O
+news	O
+,	O
+”	O
+John	O
+Vibes	O
+poignantly	O
+noted	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+bottom	O
+line	O
+is	O
+that	O
+sites	O
+like	O
+ours	O
+and	O
+the	O
+others	O
+who	O
+were	O
+wiped	O
+from	O
+the	O
+internet	O
+yesterday	O
+represent	O
+a	O
+voice	O
+against	O
+the	O
+plutocratic	B-PROP
+information	I-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+controlling	I-PROP
+establishment	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+We	O
+challenge	O
+their	O
+paradigm	O
+of	O
+control	O
+and	O
+this	O
+is	O
+a	O
+thorn	B-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+their	I-PROP
+side	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+There	O
+are	O
+no	O
+longer	O
+distinct	O
+lines	O
+between	O
+social	O
+media	O
+giants	O
+and	O
+government	O
+either	O
+which	O
+renders	O
+the	O
+“	O
+they	B-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+private	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+can	I-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+what	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+wish	I-PROP
+”	O
+argument	O
+moot	O
+.	O
+
+Facebook	O
+has	O
+been	O
+partnering	O
+with	O
+the	O
+Digital	O
+Forensics	O
+Lab	O
+,	O
+an	O
+arm	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Atlantic	O
+Council	O
+think	O
+tank	O
+—	O
+a	O
+neoconservative	O
+group	O
+funded	O
+by	O
+Gulf	O
+monarchies	O
+,	O
+defense	O
+giants	O
+like	O
+Raytheon	O
+,	O
+megabanks	O
+like	O
+HSBC	O
+,	O
+foreign	O
+state	O
+actors	O
+,	O
+and	O
+the	O
+US	O
+government	O
+—	O
+to	O
+weed	O
+out	O
+people	O
+like	O
+us	O
+who	O
+challenge	O
+the	O
+status	O
+quo	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+entity	O
+that	O
+is	O
+making	O
+censorship	O
+decisions	O
+for	O
+Facebook	O
+,	O
+as	O
+publicly	O
+announced	O
+,	O
+is	O
+the	O
+Atlantic	O
+Council	O
+,	O
+a	O
+partly	O
+US	O
+government	O
+-	O
+funded	O
+entity	O
+.	O
+
+At	O
+what	O
+point	O
+will	O
+the	O
+extremely	O
+tight	O
+ties	O
+between	O
+these	O
+companies	O
+and	O
+the	O
+US	O
+government	O
+end	O
+the	O
+"	O
+they	O
+are	O
+private	O
+"	O
+argument	O
+?	O
+
+—	O
+Daniel	O
+McAdams	O
+(	O
+@DanielLMcAdams	O
+)	O
+October	O
+12	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+Serving	O
+as	O
+a	O
+kick	B-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+teeth	I-PROP
+to	O
+the	O
+thousands	O
+of	O
+people	O
+who	O
+lost	O
+their	O
+livelihoods	O
+yesterday	O
+because	O
+of	O
+this	O
+purge	O
+is	O
+the	O
+fact	O
+that	O
+pages	O
+who	B-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+set	I-PROP
+out	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+deliberately	I-PROP
+deceive	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+put	I-PROP
+out	I-PROP
+actual	I-PROP
+fake	I-PROP
+news	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+slander	I-PROP
+others	I-PROP
+—	O
+like	O
+the	O
+infamous	O
+Your	O
+News	O
+Wire	O
+—	O
+remain	O
+intact	O
+and	O
+able	O
+to	O
+post	O
+.	O
+
+No	O
+,	O
+we	O
+are	O
+not	O
+calling	O
+for	O
+these	O
+fake	O
+pages	O
+to	O
+be	O
+removed	O
+,	O
+but	O
+instead	O
+using	O
+it	O
+as	O
+a	O
+point	O
+of	O
+reference	O
+as	O
+to	O
+why	O
+they	O
+targeted	O
+us	O
+when	O
+pages	O
+like	O
+YNW	O
+have	O
+become	O
+famous	O
+for	O
+spreading	O
+lies	O
+and	O
+deceiving	O
+people	O
+.	O
+
+Those	O
+who	O
+demanded	O
+Facebook	O
+&	O
+other	O
+Silicon	B-PROP
+Valley	I-PROP
+giants	I-PROP
+censor	O
+political	O
+content	O
+-	O
+something	O
+they	O
+did	O
+n't	O
+actually	O
+want	O
+to	O
+do	O
+-	O
+are	O
+finding	O
+that	O
+content	O
+that	O
+they	O
+themselves	O
+support	O
+&	O
+like	O
+end	O
+up	O
+being	O
+repressed	O
+.	O
+
+That	B-PROP
+'s	I-PROP
+what	I-PROP
+has	I-PROP
+happened	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+every	I-PROP
+censorship	I-PROP
+advocate	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+history	I-PROP
+:	O
+https://t.co/IZHF8GVkgC	O
+—	O
+Glenn	O
+Greenwald	O
+(	O
+@ggreenwald	O
+)	O
+October	O
+12	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+Indeed	O
+,	O
+we	O
+have	O
+reached	O
+the	O
+precipice	O
+of	O
+corporate	O
+-	O
+state	O
+censorship	O
+.	O
+
+Those	O
+who	O
+have	O
+constantly	O
+demanded	O
+that	O
+tech	O
+giants	O
+silence	O
+their	O
+critics	O
+and	O
+information	O
+that	O
+‘	O
+offends	O
+’	O
+them	O
+are	O
+finally	O
+seeing	O
+the	O
+inevitable	O
+results	O
+of	O
+such	O
+irresponsible	O
+acts	O
+.	O
+
+As	O
+we	O
+have	O
+been	O
+pointing	O
+out	O
+for	O
+the	O
+last	O
+two	O
+years	O
+,	O
+tech	O
+monopolies	O
+large	O
+enough	O
+to	O
+silence	O
+those	O
+with	O
+whom	O
+you	O
+disagree	O
+,	O
+are	O
+large	O
+enough	O
+to	O
+one	O
+day	O
+silence	O
+you	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+silver	O
+lining	O
+to	O
+this	O
+massive	B-PROP
+purge	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+independent	I-PROP
+media	I-PROP
+is	O
+that	O
+it	O
+signals	O
+the	O
+beginning	O
+of	O
+the	O
+end	O
+of	O
+censored	O
+media	O
+.	O
+
+TFTP	O
+has	O
+been	O
+planning	O
+for	O
+this	O
+day	O
+and	O
+we	O
+have	O
+been	O
+growing	O
+our	O
+email	O
+list	O
+and	O
+our	O
+subscriber	O
+base	O
+.	O
+
+We	B-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+not	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+silenced	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+While	O
+it	O
+may	O
+seem	O
+bleak	O
+for	O
+now	O
+,	O
+we	O
+will	O
+rise	O
+from	O
+the	O
+ashes	O
+of	O
+the	O
+social	B-PROP
+media	I-PROP
+dinosaurs	I-PROP
+to	O
+help	O
+build	O
+and	O
+create	O
+new	O
+platforms	O
+that	O
+are	O
+out	O
+of	O
+their	O
+control	O
+where	O
+ideas	O
+of	O
+peace	O
+and	O
+freedom	O
+can	O
+be	O
+discussed	O
+openly	O
+without	O
+fear	O
+of	O
+devoting	O
+years	O
+to	O
+a	O
+platform	O
+that	O
+can	B-PROP
+disappear	I-PROP
+you	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+blink	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+an	I-PROP
+eye	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+If	O
+you	O
+are	O
+not	O
+on	O
+our	O
+email	O
+list	O
+,	O
+please	O
+sign	O
+up	O
+here	O
+.	O
+
+If	O
+you	O
+’d	O
+like	O
+to	O
+subscribe	O
+to	O
+our	O
+site	O
+to	O
+aid	O
+in	O
+the	O
+battle	O
+against	O
+the	O
+censors	O
+and	O
+receive	O
+special	O
+perks	O
+along	O
+the	O
+way	O
+,	O
+you	O
+can	O
+do	O
+so	O
+at	O
+this	O
+link	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+are	O
+also	O
+working	O
+with	O
+the	O
+folks	O
+from	O
+minds.com	O
+and	O
+have	O
+created	O
+a	O
+platform	O
+on	O
+their	O
+uncensored	O
+network	O
+as	O
+well	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+can	O
+follow	O
+us	O
+at	O
+this	O
+link	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+have	O
+been	O
+on	O
+Steemit	O
+as	O
+well	O
+.	O
+
+And	O
+Instagram	O
+too	O
+.	O
+
+Article	O
+posted	O
+with	O
+permission	O
+from	O
+The	O
+Free	O
+Thought	O
+Project	O
+
+More	O
+Independent	O
+Media	O
+To	O
+Be	O
+Shut	O
+Down	O
+
+The	O
+very	O
+word	O
+“	O
+secrecy	O
+”	O
+is	O
+repugnant	O
+in	O
+a	O
+free	O
+and	O
+open	O
+society	O
+;	O
+and	O
+we	O
+are	O
+as	O
+a	O
+people	O
+inherently	O
+and	O
+historically	O
+opposed	O
+to	O
+secret	O
+societies	O
+,	O
+to	O
+secret	O
+oaths	O
+and	O
+to	O
+secret	O
+proceedings	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+decided	O
+long	O
+ago	O
+that	O
+the	O
+dangers	O
+of	O
+excessive	O
+and	O
+unwarranted	O
+concealment	O
+of	O
+pertinent	O
+facts	O
+far	O
+outweighed	O
+the	O
+dangers	O
+which	O
+are	O
+cited	O
+to	O
+justify	O
+it	O
+.	O
+
+Even	O
+today	O
+,	O
+there	O
+is	O
+little	O
+value	O
+in	O
+opposing	O
+the	O
+threat	O
+of	O
+a	O
+closed	O
+society	O
+by	O
+imitating	O
+its	O
+arbitrary	O
+restrictions	O
+.	O
+
+Even	O
+today	O
+,	O
+there	O
+is	O
+little	O
+value	O
+in	O
+insuring	O
+the	O
+survival	O
+of	O
+our	O
+nation	O
+if	O
+our	O
+traditions	O
+do	O
+not	O
+survive	O
+with	O
+it	O
+.	O
+
+And	O
+there	O
+is	O
+very	B-PROP
+grave	I-PROP
+danger	I-PROP
+that	O
+an	O
+announced	O
+need	O
+for	O
+increased	O
+security	O
+will	O
+be	O
+seized	O
+upon	O
+by	O
+those	O
+anxious	O
+to	O
+expand	O
+its	O
+meaning	O
+to	O
+the	O
+very	O
+limits	O
+of	O
+official	O
+censorship	O
+and	O
+concealment	O
+.	O
+
+–	O
+JFK	O
+
+If	O
+you	O
+have	O
+n’t	O
+already	O
+heard	O
+,	O
+Facebook	O
+has	O
+completely	O
+shut	O
+down	O
+hundreds	O
+,	O
+if	O
+not	O
+thousands	O
+of	O
+Independent	O
+media	O
+pages	O
+over	O
+the	O
+last	O
+year	O
+.	O
+
+Some	O
+of	O
+the	O
+biggest	O
+pages	O
+include	O
+The	O
+Free	O
+Thought	O
+Project	O
+and	O
+The	O
+Anti	O
+-	O
+media	O
+,	O
+with	O
+millions	O
+of	O
+followers	O
+each	O
+,	O
+and	O
+years	O
+of	O
+sourced	O
+journalism	O
+.	O
+
+These	O
+pages	O
+,	O
+among	O
+others	O
+,	O
+became	O
+targets	O
+a	O
+long	O
+time	O
+ago	O
+.	O
+
+Working	O
+directly	O
+in	O
+the	O
+field	O
+and	O
+behind	O
+the	O
+scenes	O
+,	O
+I	O
+can	O
+tell	O
+you	O
+that	O
+all	O
+of	O
+us	O
+have	O
+been	O
+aware	O
+of	O
+the	O
+censorship	O
+initiative	O
+for	O
+a	O
+long	O
+time	O
+because	O
+it	O
+started	O
+approximately	O
+three	O
+years	O
+ago	O
+now	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+complete	O
+deletion	O
+of	O
+multiple	O
+pages	O
+kicked	O
+off	O
+by	O
+popular	O
+media	O
+figure	O
+Alex	O
+Jones	O
+,	O
+was	O
+followed	O
+by	O
+a	O
+massive	O
+campaign	O
+of	O
+“	O
+fake	B-PROP
+news	I-PROP
+”	O
+awareness	O
+.	O
+
+One	O
+thing	O
+we	O
+need	O
+to	O
+remember	O
+here	O
+is	O
+,	O
+this	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+n’t	I-PROP
+about	I-PROP
+democrats	I-PROP
+vs	I-PROP
+republicans	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+about	I-PROP
+the	B-PROP
+elite	I-PROP
+preserving	I-PROP
+their	I-PROP
+control	I-PROP
+,	O
+and	O
+at	O
+the	O
+moment	O
+,	O
+they	O
+are	O
+using	O
+the	O
+DNC	O
+as	O
+the	O
+mouthpiece	O
+for	O
+that	O
+.	O
+
+Thus	O
+,	O
+anything	O
+that	O
+slandered	O
+Hillary	O
+Clinton	O
+during	O
+the	O
+presidential	O
+campaign	O
+,	O
+for	O
+example	O
+,	O
+was	O
+labelled	O
+as	O
+fake	O
+news	O
+,	O
+even	O
+if	O
+evidence	O
+and	O
+credible	O
+sources	O
+were	O
+used	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+is	O
+because	O
+she	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+part	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+elite	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+This	O
+is	O
+cyber	B-PROP
+false	I-PROP
+flagging	I-PROP
+at	I-PROP
+its	I-PROP
+finest	I-PROP
+,	O
+where	O
+authority	O
+figures	O
+at	O
+Facebook	O
+and	O
+within	O
+government	O
+agencies	O
+decide	O
+for	O
+the	O
+people	O
+what	O
+is	O
+real	O
+,	O
+and	O
+what	O
+is	O
+not	O
+,	O
+These	O
+tactics	O
+are	O
+complemented	O
+by	O
+a	O
+large	O
+mainstream	O
+media	O
+campaign	O
+that	O
+created	O
+awareness	O
+about	O
+fake	O
+news	O
+.	O
+
+Monkey	B-PROP
+see	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+monkey	I-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+With	O
+Liberty	O
+and	O
+Justi	O
+...	O
+Glenn	O
+Greenwald	O
+Best	O
+Price	O
+:	O
+$	O
+2.66	O
+Buy	O
+New	O
+$	O
+11.34	O
+(	O
+as	O
+of	O
+02:05	O
+EST	O
+-	O
+Details	O
+)	O
+
+Many	O
+believed	O
+what	O
+media	O
+and	O
+social	O
+media	O
+did	O
+during	O
+that	O
+election	O
+,	O
+and	O
+still	O
+now	O
+,	O
+and	O
+take	O
+on	O
+the	O
+opinion	O
+that	O
+people	O
+can	O
+not	O
+just	O
+say	O
+what	O
+they	O
+want	O
+on	O
+the	O
+internet	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+has	O
+some	O
+validity	O
+,	O
+but	O
+ultimately	O
+,	O
+the	O
+fact	O
+that	O
+Facebook	O
+pages	O
+with	O
+credibility	O
+were	O
+deleted	O
+makes	O
+it	O
+quite	O
+clear	O
+what	O
+’s	O
+going	O
+on	O
+here	O
+.	O
+
+These	O
+pages	O
+presented	O
+declassified	O
+documents	O
+,	O
+information	O
+about	O
+corporations	O
+and	O
+mainstream	O
+media	O
+,	O
+real	O
+whistleblower	O
+testimony	O
+and	O
+more	O
+.	O
+
+Yet	O
+still	O
+,	O
+they	O
+were	O
+deleted	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+population	O
+should	O
+be	O
+able	O
+to	O
+examine	O
+a	O
+source	O
+of	O
+information	O
+and	O
+determine	O
+for	O
+themselves	O
+if	O
+it	O
+’s	O
+credible	O
+,	O
+not	O
+have	O
+an	O
+authority	O
+figure	O
+do	O
+it	O
+for	O
+them	O
+.	O
+
+We	B-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+n’t	I-PROP
+need	I-PROP
+fact	I-PROP
+checkers	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+we	I-PROP
+ourselves	I-PROP
+should	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+those	I-PROP
+fact	I-PROP
+checkers	I-PROP
+!	O
+
+We	B-PROP
+have	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+responsibility	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+our	I-PROP
+planet	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+those	I-PROP
+fact	I-PROP
+checkers	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+not	I-PROP
+let	I-PROP
+authority	I-PROP
+figures	I-PROP
+with	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+tremendous	I-PROP
+amount	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+power	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+wealth	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+conflicts	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+interests	I-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+us	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+“	O
+The	O
+problem	O
+of	O
+fake	O
+news	O
+is	O
+n’t	O
+solved	O
+by	O
+hoping	O
+for	O
+a	O
+referee	O
+,	O
+but	O
+rather	O
+because	O
+we	O
+as	O
+citizens	O
+,	O
+we	O
+as	O
+users	O
+of	O
+these	O
+services	O
+,	O
+help	O
+each	O
+other	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+talk	O
+and	O
+we	O
+share	O
+and	O
+we	O
+point	O
+out	O
+what	O
+is	O
+fake	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+point	O
+out	O
+what	O
+is	O
+true	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+answer	O
+to	O
+bad	O
+speech	O
+is	O
+not	O
+censorship	O
+,	O
+the	B-PROP
+answer	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+bad	I-PROP
+speech	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+more	I-PROP
+speech	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+We	B-PROP
+have	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+exercise	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+spread	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+idea	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+critical	I-PROP
+thinking	I-PROP
+matters	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+now	I-PROP
+more	I-PROP
+than	I-PROP
+ever	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+given	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+fact	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+lies	I-PROP
+seem	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+getting	I-PROP
+more	I-PROP
+popular	I-PROP
+.	O
+”	O
+–	O
+Edward	O
+Snowden	O
+(	O
+source	O
+)	O
+
+Facebook	O
+A	O
+Revolving	O
+Door	O
+
+Facebook	O
+has	O
+become	O
+a	O
+revolving	O
+door	O
+like	O
+Monsanto	O
+,	O
+with	O
+high	O
+-	O
+ranking	O
+DARPA	O
+employees	O
+,	O
+like	O
+Regina	O
+Duggan	O
+,	O
+who	O
+has	O
+since	O
+left	O
+Facebook	O
+,	O
+and	O
+people	O
+from	O
+similar	O
+backgrounds	O
+now	O
+spearheading	O
+their	O
+mission	O
+.	O
+
+What	O
+is	O
+Facebook	O
+’s	O
+mission	O
+?	O
+
+Well	O
+at	O
+the	O
+moment	O
+it	O
+seems	O
+to	O
+be	O
+censoring	O
+of	O
+information	O
+.	O
+
+Their	O
+key	O
+strategy	O
+is	O
+to	O
+label	O
+everything	O
+as	O
+fake	O
+news	O
+to	O
+build	O
+an	O
+excuse	O
+to	O
+delete	O
+Facebook	O
+pages	O
+that	O
+are	O
+dissenting	O
+voices	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+see	O
+,	O
+independent	O
+media	O
+,	O
+like	O
+CE	O
+,	O
+became	O
+extremely	B-PROP
+popular	O
+,	O
+receiving	O
+many	O
+millions	O
+in	O
+website	O
+every	O
+single	O
+month	O
+,	O
+that	O
+traffic	O
+came	O
+from	O
+Facebook	O
+.	O
+
+Independent	O
+media	O
+outlets	O
+were	O
+greatly	O
+surpassing	O
+mainstream	O
+media	O
+in	O
+their	O
+power	O
+and	O
+voice	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+is	O
+something	O
+people	O
+on	O
+the	O
+outside	O
+ca	O
+n’t	O
+really	O
+see	O
+as	O
+all	O
+of	O
+this	O
+happens	O
+,	O
+but	O
+I	O
+am	O
+on	O
+the	O
+inside	O
+,	O
+so	O
+I	O
+see	O
+exactly	O
+what	O
+’s	O
+taking	O
+place	O
+.	O
+
+Eyes	O
+were	O
+shifting	O
+away	O
+from	O
+the	O
+small	O
+group	O
+of	O
+people	O
+who	O
+have	O
+controlled	O
+media	O
+since	O
+media	O
+’s	O
+inception	O
+.	O
+
+Independent	O
+media	O
+brought	O
+to	O
+light	O
+a	O
+number	O
+of	O
+facts	O
+that	O
+threaten	O
+the	O
+agenda	O
+of	O
+the	B-PROP
+global	I-PROP
+elite	I-PROP
+,	O
+like	O
+intelligence	O
+agency	O
+/	O
+government	O
+connections	O
+to	O
+mainstream	O
+media	O
+for	O
+example	O
+,	O
+and	O
+their	O
+plans	O
+in	O
+the	O
+middle	O
+east	O
+to	O
+basically	O
+invade	O
+,	O
+take	O
+-	O
+over	O
+,	O
+and	O
+establish	O
+a	O
+government	O
+that	O
+suits	O
+the	B-PROP
+Deep	I-PROP
+State	I-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+best	I-PROP
+interests	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+There	O
+are	O
+several	O
+examples	O
+from	O
+all	O
+fields	O
+that	O
+surround	O
+human	O
+life	O
+,	O
+from	O
+healthcare	O
+to	O
+politics	O
+,	O
+and	O
+it	O
+all	O
+seems	O
+to	O
+be	O
+controlled	O
+by	O
+one	O
+massive	O
+conglomerate	O
+at	O
+the	O
+top	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+’ve	O
+been	O
+writing	O
+about	O
+this	O
+for	O
+nearly	O
+a	O
+decade	O
+now	O
+.	O
+
+The	B-PROP
+Deep	I-PROP
+State	I-PROP
+Has	I-PROP
+Power	I-PROP
+Due	I-PROP
+To	I-PROP
+Our	I-PROP
+Unconsciousness	I-PROP
+
+They	O
+(	O
+global	O
+elite	O
+)	O
+continue	O
+to	O
+do	O
+what	O
+they	O
+are	O
+able	O
+to	O
+do	O
+because	O
+of	O
+human	O
+consciousness	O
+.	O
+
+The	B-PROP
+more	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+who	I-PROP
+consider	I-PROP
+this	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+“	I-PROP
+conspiracy	I-PROP
+theory	I-PROP
+”	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+turn	I-PROP
+their	I-PROP
+heads	I-PROP
+away	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+easier	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+them	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+continue	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+have	I-PROP
+power	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+I	B-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+n’t	I-PROP
+understand	I-PROP
+how	I-PROP
+so	I-PROP
+much	I-PROP
+information	I-PROP
+can	I-PROP
+come	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+light	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+yet	I-PROP
+when	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+deemed	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+“	I-PROP
+conspiracy	I-PROP
+”	I-PROP
+theory	I-PROP
+”	I-PROP
+within	I-PROP
+mainstream	I-PROP
+media	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+everybody	I-PROP
+simply	I-PROP
+follows	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+rhetoric	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+without	O
+doing	O
+any	O
+investigation	O
+or	O
+research	O
+for	O
+themselves	O
+.	O
+
+If	O
+you	O
+do	O
+n’t	O
+look	O
+into	O
+it	O
+,	O
+do	O
+n’t	O
+share	O
+an	O
+opinion	O
+on	O
+it	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Condemnation	B-PROP
+without	I-PROP
+investigation	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+height	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+ignorance	I-PROP
+.	O
+”	O
+–	O
+Einstein	O
+.	O
+
+All	O
+of	O
+these	O
+media	O
+sources	O
+were	O
+operating	O
+normally	O
+until	O
+Donald	O
+Trump	O
+became	O
+president	O
+,	O
+and	O
+until	O
+Hillary	O
+Clinton	O
+,	O
+Obama	O
+,	O
+Bush	O
+,	O
+etc	O
+were	O
+outed	O
+as	O
+global	B-PROP
+elite	I-PROP
+puppets	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Heck	O
+,	O
+the	O
+Clinton	O
+’s	O
+and	O
+John	O
+Podesta	O
+have	O
+even	O
+referenced	O
+Wikileaks	O
+before	O
+that	O
+became	O
+‘	O
+fake	O
+.	O
+’	O
+Despite	O
+operating	O
+with	O
+credibility	O
+for	O
+more	O
+than	O
+a	O
+decade	O
+before	O
+the	O
+accusations	O
+.	O
+
+What	O
+does	O
+the	O
+media	O
+operating	O
+normally	O
+mean	O
+?	O
+
+Still	O
+manipulating	O
+the	O
+public	O
+,	O
+but	O
+at	O
+least	O
+they	O
+were	O
+reporting	O
+on	O
+both	O
+sides	O
+as	O
+a	O
+whole	O
+.	O
+
+Now	O
+,	O
+it	O
+’s	O
+quite	O
+different	O
+.	O
+
+Donald	O
+Trump	O
+is	O
+extremely	B-PROP
+vilified	I-PROP
+not	O
+because	O
+he	O
+allegedly	O
+is	O
+/	O
+was	O
+racist	O
+/	O
+sexist	O
+,	O
+but	O
+because	O
+he	O
+threatens	O
+neoliberalism	O
+and	O
+neoconservatism	O
+,	O
+the	O
+American	B-PROP
+empire	I-PROP
+,	O
+one	O
+that	O
+continues	O
+to	O
+try	O
+and	O
+push	O
+an	O
+Orwellian	O
+state	O
+type	O
+of	O
+existence	O
+,	O
+which	O
+seems	O
+to	O
+be	O
+ramping	O
+up	O
+every	O
+single	O
+year	O
+.	O
+
+Trump	O
+was	O
+not	O
+supposed	O
+to	O
+win	O
+,	O
+and	O
+no	O
+this	O
+is	O
+n’t	O
+about	O
+democrats	O
+vs	O
+republicans	O
+or	O
+that	O
+Trump	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+saviour	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+The	B-PROP
+Deep	I-PROP
+State	I-PROP
+responded	O
+like	B-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+always	I-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+every	I-PROP
+time	I-PROP
+something	I-PROP
+‘	I-PROP
+goes	I-PROP
+wrong	I-PROP
+,	O
+’	O
+they	O
+blamed	O
+Russia	O
+,	O
+as	O
+well	O
+as	O
+media	O
+outlets	O
+like	O
+Collective	O
+Evolution	O
+and	O
+others	O
+.	O
+
+Some	O
+of	O
+which	O
+have	O
+now	O
+been	O
+deleted	O
+as	O
+mentioned	O
+above	O
+.	O
+
+Trump	O
+is	O
+Not	O
+The	O
+Solution	O
+,	O
+We	O
+Are	O
+
+Things	O
+are	O
+getting	O
+pretty	B-PROP
+ridiculous	I-PROP
+,	O
+but	B-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+’re	I-PROP
+too	I-PROP
+late	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Even	O
+if	O
+they	O
+do	O
+succeed	O
+in	O
+deleting	O
+more	O
+independent	O
+media	O
+sites	O
+from	O
+social	O
+media	O
+,	O
+they	O
+can	O
+not	O
+erase	O
+them	O
+from	O
+the	O
+internet	O
+.	O
+
+Yes	O
+,	O
+social	O
+media	O
+platforms	O
+were	O
+great	O
+for	O
+spreading	O
+information	O
+across	O
+the	O
+internet	O
+and	O
+for	O
+having	O
+more	O
+people	O
+become	O
+aware	O
+of	O
+it	O
+.	O
+
+It	O
+really	O
+showed	O
+what	O
+people	O
+were	O
+interested	O
+in	O
+,	O
+and	O
+what	O
+people	O
+wanted	O
+to	O
+see	O
+,	O
+but	O
+clearly	O
+,	O
+we	O
+do	O
+not	O
+live	O
+in	O
+a	O
+democracy	O
+and	O
+that	O
+does	O
+n’t	O
+matter	O
+.	O
+
+Against	O
+the	O
+State	O
+:	O
+An	O
+...	O
+Llewellyn	O
+H.	O
+Rockwell	O
+Jr.	O
+Best	O
+Price	O
+:	O
+$	O
+9.94	O
+Buy	O
+New	O
+$	O
+9.95	O
+(	O
+as	O
+of	O
+01:45	O
+EST	O
+-	O
+Details	O
+)	O
+
+People	O
+are	O
+still	O
+going	O
+to	O
+search	O
+for	O
+information	O
+,	O
+and	O
+alternative	O
+forms	O
+of	O
+information	O
+,	O
+given	O
+the	O
+fact	O
+that	O
+what	O
+they	O
+see	O
+coming	O
+from	O
+the	O
+mainstream	O
+is	O
+usually	O
+highly	O
+suspect	O
+and	O
+questionable	O
+.	O
+
+More	O
+and	O
+more	O
+people	O
+see	O
+it	O
+this	O
+way	O
+because	O
+our	O
+consciousness	O
+continues	O
+to	O
+shift	O
+.	O
+
+Social	O
+media	O
+platforms	O
+do	O
+not	O
+control	O
+the	O
+awakening	O
+but	O
+have	O
+been	O
+a	O
+great	O
+tool	O
+to	O
+grow	O
+it	O
+,	O
+but	O
+it	O
+’s	O
+something	O
+that	O
+can	O
+not	O
+be	O
+stopped	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+more	O
+we	O
+awaken	O
+and	O
+truly	O
+see	O
+past	O
+the	O
+political	O
+games	O
+,	O
+the	O
+more	O
+we	O
+pull	O
+power	O
+from	O
+the	O
+power	O
+grid	O
+that	O
+keeps	O
+all	O
+this	O
+in	O
+place	O
+.	O
+
+2020	O
+
+Now	O
+,	O
+all	O
+of	O
+this	O
+seems	O
+to	O
+be	O
+taking	O
+place	O
+with	O
+perfect	B-PROP
+timing	I-PROP
+before	O
+the	O
+2020	O
+election	O
+.	O
+
+No	O
+doubt	O
+that	O
+the	B-PROP
+Deep	I-PROP
+State	I-PROP
+will	O
+want	O
+to	O
+take	O
+back	O
+the	O
+presidency	O
+,	O
+but	O
+ultimately	O
+,	O
+we	O
+need	O
+to	O
+see	O
+the	O
+bigger	O
+picture	O
+here	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+need	O
+to	O
+see	O
+what	O
+politics	O
+actually	O
+is	O
+,	O
+and	O
+the	O
+past	O
+few	O
+years	O
+alone	O
+have	O
+provided	O
+us	O
+with	O
+the	O
+opportunity	O
+to	O
+see	O
+.	O
+
+It	B-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+nothing	I-PROP
+but	I-PROP
+elite	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+corporations	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+financial	I-PROP
+elite	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+have	I-PROP
+become	I-PROP
+drenched	I-PROP
+with	I-PROP
+so	I-PROP
+much	I-PROP
+power	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+have	I-PROP
+been	I-PROP
+able	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+direct	O
+human	O
+will	O
+and	O
+use	O
+it	O
+for	O
+their	O
+own	O
+selfish	O
+purposes	O
+.	O
+
+With	O
+powerful	O
+revelations	O
+that	O
+have	O
+come	O
+to	O
+light	O
+,	O
+like	O
+elite	O
+pedophilia	O
+and	O
+ritual	O
+abuse	O
+,	O
+and	O
+extreme	B-PROP
+corruption	I-PROP
+,	O
+why	O
+do	O
+we	O
+still	O
+participate	O
+?	O
+
+Why	B-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+we	I-PROP
+choose	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+elect	I-PROP
+these	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+?	I-PROP
+
+Why	B-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+we	I-PROP
+believe	I-PROP
+we	I-PROP
+live	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+democracy	I-PROP
+when	I-PROP
+what	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+want	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+look	I-PROP
+at	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+what	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+majority	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+want	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+have	I-PROP
+done	I-PROP
+(	I-PROP
+like	I-PROP
+GMO	I-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+labelling	I-PROP
+)	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+completely	I-PROP
+censored	I-PROP
+?	O
+
+Why	O
+are	O
+harmful	B-PROP
+‘	I-PROP
+things	I-PROP
+’	O
+surrounding	O
+us	O
+constantly	O
+when	O
+we	O
+have	O
+science	O
+showing	O
+it	O
+’s	O
+not	O
+safe	O
+,	O
+like	O
+cell	O
+phone	O
+towers	O
+etc	O
+.	O
+
+It	O
+’s	O
+simply	O
+because	O
+power	O
+lies	O
+within	O
+the	O
+corporatocracy	O
+.	O
+
+Decisions	B-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+n’t	I-PROP
+being	I-PROP
+made	I-PROP
+with	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+best	I-PROP
+interest	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+humanity	I-PROP
+at	I-PROP
+heart	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+this	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+why	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+system	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+failing	I-PROP
+because	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+not	I-PROP
+actually	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Today	O
+the	O
+path	O
+to	O
+total	B-PROP
+dictatorship	O
+in	O
+the	O
+U.S.	O
+can	O
+be	O
+laid	O
+by	O
+strictly	O
+legal	O
+means	O
+…	O
+We	O
+have	O
+a	O
+well	O
+-	O
+organized	O
+political	O
+-	O
+action	O
+group	O
+in	O
+this	O
+country	O
+,	O
+determined	O
+to	O
+destroy	O
+our	B-PROP
+Constitution	O
+and	O
+establish	O
+a	O
+one	O
+-	O
+party	O
+state	O
+…	O
+It	O
+operates	O
+secretly	O
+,	O
+silently	O
+,	O
+continuously	O
+to	O
+transform	O
+our	B-PROP
+Government	O
+…	O
+This	B-PROP
+ruthless	I-PROP
+power	I-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+seeking	I-PROP
+elite	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+disease	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+our	I-PROP
+century	I-PROP
+…	O
+This	O
+group	O
+…	O
+is	O
+answerable	O
+neither	O
+to	O
+the	O
+President	O
+,	O
+the	O
+Congress	O
+,	O
+nor	O
+the	O
+courts	O
+.	O
+
+It	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+practically	I-PROP
+irremovable	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+–	O
+Senator	O
+William	O
+Jenner	O
+(	O
+source	O
+)	O
+
+Before	O
+2020	O
+,	O
+they	O
+’re	O
+going	O
+to	O
+want	O
+to	O
+silence	O
+anything	O
+that	O
+creates	O
+awareness	O
+about	O
+the	O
+corruption	B-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+deceit	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+lies	I-PROP
+that	O
+have	O
+dominated	O
+the	O
+presidency	O
+and	O
+the	O
+entire	O
+military	O
+-	O
+industrial	O
+complex	O
+for	O
+years	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+fact	O
+of	O
+the	O
+matter	O
+is	O
+:	O
+
+“	O
+The	O
+conscious	O
+and	O
+intelligent	O
+manipulation	O
+of	O
+the	O
+organized	O
+habits	O
+and	O
+opinions	O
+of	O
+the	O
+masses	O
+is	O
+an	O
+important	O
+element	O
+in	O
+democratic	O
+society	O
+.	O
+
+Those	O
+who	O
+manipulate	O
+this	O
+unseen	O
+mechanism	O
+of	O
+society	O
+constitute	O
+an	O
+invisible	O
+government	O
+which	O
+is	O
+the	O
+true	O
+ruling	O
+power	O
+of	O
+our	O
+country	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+are	O
+governed	O
+,	O
+our	O
+minds	O
+are	O
+moulded	O
+,	O
+our	O
+tastes	O
+formed	O
+,	O
+our	O
+ideas	O
+suggested	O
+,	O
+largely	O
+by	O
+men	O
+we	O
+have	O
+never	O
+heard	O
+of	O
+.	O
+”	O
+–	O
+Edward	O
+Bernays	O
+(	O
+“	O
+the	B-PROP
+father	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+public	I-PROP
+relations	I-PROP
+”	O
+)	O
+,	O
+Propaganda	O
+,	O
+1928	O
+(	O
+note	O
+that	O
+Bernays	O
+’	O
+book	O
+,	O
+Propaganda	O
+,	O
+begins	O
+with	O
+the	O
+above	O
+quote	O
+)	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+is	O
+what	O
+’s	O
+unravelling	O
+,	O
+and	O
+the	O
+stronger	O
+the	O
+push	O
+the	O
+unravel	O
+it	O
+,	O
+the	O
+stronger	O
+the	O
+reaction	O
+and	O
+response	O
+from	O
+the	O
+deep	O
+state	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Takeaway	O
+
+Recognize	O
+what	O
+’s	O
+happening	O
+,	O
+the	O
+massive	B-PROP
+censorship	I-PROP
+of	O
+information	O
+,	O
+coupled	O
+with	O
+the	O
+ridicule	B-PROP
+or	I-PROP
+finger	B-PROP
+pointing	I-PROP
+,	O
+or	O
+even	O
+arrest	O
+of	O
+people	O
+who	O
+choose	O
+to	O
+voice	O
+an	O
+opinion	O
+in	O
+opposition	O
+to	O
+the	O
+rhetoric	O
+that	O
+’s	O
+constantly	O
+spewed	O
+by	O
+mainstream	O
+media	O
+,	O
+which	O
+in	O
+turn	O
+is	O
+usually	O
+believed	O
+by	O
+the	O
+masses	O
+.	O
+
+At	O
+the	O
+same	O
+time	O
+,	O
+independent	O
+media	O
+represents	O
+a	O
+shift	O
+in	O
+consciousness	O
+.	O
+
+A	O
+shift	O
+in	O
+our	O
+perceptions	O
+,	O
+thoughts	O
+,	O
+feelings	O
+and	O
+general	O
+self	O
+-	O
+awareness	O
+about	O
+our	O
+own	O
+planet	O
+is	O
+changing	O
+,	O
+and	O
+thus	O
+,	O
+change	O
+has	O
+been	O
+sprouted	O
+in	O
+multiple	O
+different	O
+areas	O
+,	O
+including	O
+political	O
+corruption	O
+and	O
+the	O
+stranglehold	O
+it	O
+has	O
+over	O
+our	O
+world	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+are	O
+more	O
+aware	O
+,	O
+but	O
+there	O
+is	O
+still	O
+some	O
+ways	O
+to	O
+go	O
+…	O
+
+A	O
+good	O
+chunk	O
+of	O
+work	O
+has	O
+been	O
+done	O
+.	O
+
+A	O
+massive	O
+transformation	O
+of	O
+consciousness	O
+has	O
+taken	O
+place	O
+and	O
+it	O
+seems	O
+that	O
+a	O
+global	O
+mass	O
+is	O
+growing	O
+closer	O
+to	O
+a	O
+critical	O
+mass	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+censorship	O
+of	O
+independent	O
+media	O
+is	O
+irrelevant	O
+in	O
+a	O
+sense	O
+,	O
+because	O
+the	O
+shift	O
+will	O
+continue	O
+to	O
+happen	O
+,	O
+change	B-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+continue	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+happen	I-PROP
+,	O
+and	O
+information	B-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+deep	I-PROP
+state	I-PROP
+does	I-PROP
+not	I-PROP
+want	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+public	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+become	I-PROP
+aware	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+keep	I-PROP
+making	I-PROP
+its	I-PROP
+way	I-PROP
+into	I-PROP
+transparency	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Independent	O
+media	O
+will	O
+continue	O
+to	O
+have	O
+the	O
+opportunity	O
+to	O
+share	O
+information	O
+because	O
+of	O
+a	O
+lack	O
+of	O
+credible	O
+information	O
+and	O
+plain	O
+truth	O
+within	O
+the	O
+mainstream	O
+.	O
+
+People	O
+are	O
+hungry	O
+for	O
+it	O
+,	O
+and	O
+will	O
+seek	O
+it	O
+out	O
+themselves	O
+.	O
+
+Reprinted	O
+with	O
+permission	O
+from	O
+Collective	O
+Evolution	O
+.	O
+
+Mueller	O
+Submits	O
+His	O
+Russia	O
+Report	O
+to	O
+Justice	O
+Department	O
+
+Special	O
+Counsel	O
+Robert	O
+Mueller	O
+concluded	O
+his	O
+22-month	O
+Russia	O
+investigation	O
+and	O
+submitted	O
+a	O
+report	O
+to	O
+Attorney	O
+General	O
+William	O
+Barr	O
+on	O
+Friday	O
+,	O
+triggering	O
+a	O
+clamor	O
+from	O
+Congress	O
+to	O
+see	O
+the	O
+findings	O
+.	O
+
+A	O
+Justice	O
+Department	O
+official	O
+told	O
+the	O
+Associated	O
+Press	O
+that	O
+Mueller	O
+is	O
+not	O
+recommending	O
+any	O
+further	O
+indictments	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+a	O
+letter	O
+to	O
+the	O
+heads	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Senate	O
+and	O
+House	O
+judiciary	O
+committees	O
+,	O
+Barr	O
+described	O
+Mueller	O
+’s	O
+submission	O
+as	O
+a	O
+“	O
+confidential	O
+report	O
+explaining	O
+the	O
+prosecution	O
+or	O
+declination	O
+decisions	O
+he	O
+has	O
+reached	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+“	O
+I	O
+am	O
+reviewing	O
+the	O
+report	O
+and	O
+anticipate	O
+that	O
+I	O
+may	O
+be	O
+in	O
+a	O
+position	O
+to	O
+advise	O
+you	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Special	O
+Counsel	O
+’s	O
+principal	O
+conclusions	O
+as	O
+soon	O
+as	O
+this	O
+weekend	O
+,	O
+”	O
+the	O
+letter	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+Barr	O
+did	O
+not	O
+detail	O
+what	O
+the	O
+report	O
+contains	O
+,	O
+but	O
+did	O
+say	O
+that	O
+the	O
+Justice	O
+Department	O
+did	O
+not	O
+overrule	O
+any	O
+decision	O
+Mueller	O
+made	O
+.	O
+
+Barr	O
+said	O
+he	O
+will	O
+consult	O
+with	O
+Mueller	O
+and	O
+Deputy	O
+Attorney	O
+General	O
+Rod	O
+Rosenstein	O
+,	O
+who	O
+has	O
+mostly	O
+overseen	O
+the	O
+Special	O
+Counsel	O
+’s	O
+Office	O
+,	O
+about	O
+“	O
+what	O
+other	O
+information	O
+from	O
+the	O
+report	O
+”	O
+can	O
+be	O
+released	O
+to	O
+Congress	O
+and	O
+the	O
+public	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+White	O
+House	O
+and	O
+President	O
+Trump	O
+’s	O
+lawyers	O
+said	O
+the	O
+next	O
+decisions	O
+are	O
+up	O
+to	O
+Barr	O
+.	O
+
+There	O
+is	O
+a	O
+possibility	O
+that	O
+Barr	O
+releases	O
+two	O
+separate	O
+reports	O
+.	O
+
+One	O
+would	O
+summarize	O
+Mueller	O
+’s	O
+findings	O
+without	O
+including	O
+classified	O
+information	O
+and	O
+would	O
+be	O
+given	O
+to	O
+Congress	O
+—	O
+and	O
+would	O
+then	O
+most	O
+likely	O
+find	O
+its	O
+way	O
+out	O
+into	O
+the	O
+public	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+other	O
+would	O
+be	O
+given	O
+to	O
+a	O
+smaller	O
+group	O
+of	O
+lawmakers	O
+who	O
+head	O
+major	O
+congressional	O
+committees	O
+,	O
+such	O
+as	O
+the	O
+House	O
+and	O
+Senate	O
+intelligence	O
+committees	O
+.	O
+
+Rep.	O
+Adam	O
+Schiff	O
+(	O
+D	O
+-	O
+CA	O
+)	O
+,	O
+chairman	O
+of	O
+House	O
+Intelligence	O
+,	O
+called	O
+for	O
+transparency	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Mueller	O
+’s	O
+investigation	O
+began	O
+as	O
+a	O
+counterintelligence	O
+inquiry	O
+into	O
+whether	O
+individuals	O
+associated	O
+with	O
+the	O
+Trump	O
+campaign	O
+were	O
+compromised	O
+by	O
+a	O
+foreign	O
+power	O
+.	O
+
+By	O
+law	O
+,	O
+that	O
+evidence	O
+he	O
+uncovered	O
+must	O
+be	O
+shared	O
+with	O
+our	O
+Committee	O
+,	O
+”	O
+he	O
+said	O
+in	O
+a	O
+tweet	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+And	O
+his	O
+report	O
+must	O
+also	O
+be	O
+made	O
+public	O
+.	O
+
+Now	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Trump	O
+has	O
+previously	O
+said	O
+he	O
+supports	O
+the	O
+idea	O
+of	O
+making	O
+the	O
+report	O
+public	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+I	O
+do	O
+n’t	O
+mind	O
+,	O
+”	O
+he	O
+has	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+I	O
+mean	O
+,	O
+frankly	O
+,	O
+I	O
+told	O
+the	O
+House	O
+,	O
+‘	O
+If	O
+you	O
+want	O
+,	O
+let	O
+them	O
+see	O
+it	O
+.	O
+’	O
+”	O
+
+Trump	O
+has	O
+also	O
+vigorously	B-PROP
+denied	I-PROP
+any	O
+wrongdoing	O
+and	O
+has	O
+repeatedly	O
+branded	O
+the	O
+probe	O
+as	O
+a	B-PROP
+“	I-PROP
+total	I-PROP
+witch	I-PROP
+hunt	I-PROP
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Mueller	O
+will	O
+remain	O
+as	O
+special	O
+counsel	O
+for	O
+a	O
+period	O
+of	O
+time	O
+as	O
+he	O
+and	O
+a	O
+small	O
+contingent	O
+of	O
+staff	O
+close	O
+the	O
+office	O
+,	O
+a	O
+Justice	O
+Department	O
+spokesperson	O
+reportedly	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+handover	O
+of	O
+the	O
+report	O
+marks	O
+the	O
+end	O
+of	O
+an	O
+investigation	O
+that	O
+has	O
+for	O
+nearly	O
+two	O
+years	O
+transfixed	B-PROP
+the	O
+nation	O
+,	O
+yielded	O
+dozens	O
+of	O
+indictments	O
+and	O
+convictions	O
+,	O
+and	O
+brought	O
+down	O
+a	O
+handful	O
+of	O
+Trump	O
+’s	O
+closest	O
+advisers	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Special	O
+Counsel	O
+’s	O
+Office	O
+was	O
+tasked	O
+broadly	O
+with	O
+investigating	O
+any	O
+links	O
+or	O
+coordination	O
+between	O
+the	O
+Russian	O
+government	O
+and	O
+individuals	O
+associated	O
+with	O
+the	O
+Trump	O
+campaign	O
+,	O
+as	O
+well	O
+as	O
+any	O
+matters	O
+that	O
+arose	O
+directly	O
+from	O
+the	O
+probe	O
+.	O
+
+However	O
+,	O
+the	O
+scope	O
+of	O
+the	O
+investigation	O
+seems	O
+to	O
+have	O
+bled	O
+outside	O
+those	O
+lines	O
+.	O
+
+Several	O
+witnesses	O
+,	O
+for	O
+example	O
+,	O
+have	O
+been	O
+questioned	O
+about	O
+other	O
+countries	O
+’	O
+efforts	O
+to	O
+meddle	O
+in	O
+American	O
+politics	O
+,	O
+including	O
+Saudi	O
+Arabia	O
+,	O
+Israel	O
+,	O
+the	O
+UAE	O
+and	O
+Qatar	O
+.	O
+
+So	O
+far	O
+,	O
+the	O
+Special	O
+Counsel	O
+’s	O
+Office	O
+has	O
+indicted	O
+or	O
+obtained	O
+guilty	O
+pleas	O
+from	O
+34	O
+people	O
+and	O
+three	O
+companies	O
+.	O
+
+Six	O
+of	O
+those	O
+are	O
+former	O
+Trump	O
+associates	O
+,	O
+and	O
+25	O
+of	O
+them	O
+are	O
+Russians	O
+.	O
+
+No	O
+Americans	O
+have	O
+been	O
+charged	O
+with	O
+conspiring	O
+with	O
+Russians	O
+to	O
+meddle	O
+in	O
+the	O
+2016	O
+elections	O
+—	O
+at	O
+least	O
+none	O
+the	O
+public	O
+knows	O
+about	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+major	O
+Trumpworld	O
+figures	O
+were	O
+charged	O
+with	O
+a	O
+variety	O
+of	O
+other	O
+crimes	O
+,	O
+including	O
+former	O
+National	O
+Security	O
+Adviser	O
+Michael	O
+Flynn	O
+,	O
+former	O
+campaign	O
+chairman	O
+Paul	O
+Manafort	O
+,	O
+deputy	O
+campaign	O
+chairman	O
+Richard	O
+Gates	O
+and	O
+Trump	O
+'s	O
+former	O
+personal	O
+lawyer	O
+and	O
+fixer	O
+Michael	O
+Cohen	O
+.	O
+
+Cohen	O
+has	O
+been	O
+sentenced	O
+to	O
+three	O
+years	O
+in	O
+prison	O
+for	O
+crimes	O
+he	O
+committed	O
+while	O
+working	O
+for	O
+Trump	O
+,	O
+including	O
+the	O
+payments	O
+he	O
+made	O
+to	O
+two	O
+adult	O
+film	O
+star	O
+actresses	O
+for	O
+their	O
+alleged	O
+affairs	O
+with	O
+his	O
+boss	O
+.	O
+
+Manafort	O
+was	O
+sentenced	O
+in	O
+both	O
+Virginia	O
+and	O
+in	O
+Washington	O
+and	O
+will	O
+serve	O
+about	O
+seven	O
+years	O
+in	O
+prison	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+Washington	O
+,	O
+Manafort	O
+was	O
+sentenced	O
+for	O
+for	O
+conspiring	O
+against	O
+the	O
+U.S.	O
+and	O
+a	O
+conspiracy	O
+to	O
+obstruct	O
+justice	O
+connected	O
+to	O
+his	O
+covert	O
+lobbying	O
+on	O
+behalf	O
+of	O
+Ukraine	O
+’s	O
+former	O
+pro	O
+-	O
+Russian	O
+government	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+was	O
+sentenced	O
+in	O
+Virginia	O
+for	O
+bank	O
+and	O
+wire	O
+fraud	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Special	O
+Counsel	O
+’s	O
+Office	O
+said	O
+in	O
+a	O
+court	O
+filing	O
+last	O
+week	O
+that	O
+it	O
+had	O
+gotten	O
+all	O
+it	O
+can	O
+out	O
+of	O
+Flynn	O
+,	O
+who	O
+has	O
+been	O
+cooperating	O
+for	O
+months	O
+after	O
+pleading	O
+guilty	O
+in	O
+December	O
+2017	O
+to	O
+lying	O
+to	O
+the	O
+FBI	O
+about	O
+his	O
+interactions	O
+with	O
+Russian	O
+Ambassador	O
+Sergei	O
+Kislyak	O
+.	O
+
+It	O
+’s	O
+unclear	O
+when	O
+he	O
+will	O
+be	O
+sentenced	O
+but	O
+his	O
+lawyers	O
+want	O
+to	O
+wait	O
+until	O
+the	O
+trial	O
+for	O
+his	O
+former	O
+business	O
+partners	O
+begins	O
+in	O
+Virginia	O
+.	O
+
+Gates	O
+has	O
+also	O
+been	O
+cooperating	O
+on	O
+a	O
+wide	O
+variety	O
+of	O
+topics	O
+associated	O
+with	O
+the	O
+Russia	O
+investigation	O
+,	O
+including	O
+the	O
+work	O
+of	O
+Manafort	O
+.	O
+
+As	O
+of	O
+March	O
+,	O
+Gates	O
+was	O
+still	O
+offering	O
+the	O
+Mueller	O
+team	O
+information	O
+about	O
+his	O
+time	O
+working	O
+for	O
+Trump	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+pleaded	O
+guilty	O
+in	O
+February	O
+2018	O
+to	O
+conspiracy	O
+and	O
+lying	O
+to	O
+the	O
+FBI	O
+.	O
+
+Several	O
+other	O
+law	O
+enforcement	O
+agencies	O
+have	O
+picked	O
+up	O
+pieces	O
+of	O
+Mueller	O
+’s	O
+Russia	O
+investigation	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+U.S.	O
+Attorney	O
+’s	O
+Office	O
+for	O
+the	O
+Southern	O
+District	O
+of	O
+New	O
+York	O
+is	O
+actively	O
+probing	O
+the	O
+Trump	O
+inaugural	O
+committee	O
+to	O
+determine	O
+if	O
+it	O
+received	O
+illegal	O
+foreign	O
+donations	O
+and	O
+if	O
+any	O
+of	O
+that	O
+money	O
+flowed	O
+through	O
+American	O
+intermediaries	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Eastern	O
+District	O
+of	O
+New	O
+York	O
+has	O
+reportedly	O
+taken	O
+over	O
+some	O
+aspects	O
+of	O
+that	O
+probe	O
+.	O
+
+SDNY	O
+is	O
+also	O
+looking	O
+into	O
+the	O
+hush	O
+money	O
+payments	O
+Trump	O
+made	O
+to	O
+two	O
+former	O
+adult	O
+film	O
+actresses	O
+via	O
+Cohen	O
+.	O
+
+A	O
+host	O
+of	O
+other	O
+local	O
+and	O
+state	O
+law	O
+enforcement	O
+offices	O
+are	O
+working	O
+on	O
+matters	O
+related	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Trump	O
+campaign	O
+and	O
+Trump	O
+organization	O
+.	O
+
+Congress	O
+has	O
+also	O
+launched	O
+several	O
+of	O
+its	O
+own	O
+probes	O
+into	O
+White	O
+House	O
+security	O
+clearances	O
+,	O
+Trump	O
+’s	O
+tax	O
+returns	O
+and	O
+possible	O
+obstruction	O
+of	O
+justice	O
+.	O
+
+Mueller	O
+report	O
+:	O
+No	O
+further	O
+indictments	O
+
+Special	O
+counsel	O
+Robert	O
+Mueller	O
+’s	O
+much	O
+-	O
+anticipated	O
+final	O
+report	O
+on	O
+his	O
+investigation	O
+of	O
+Russian	O
+interference	O
+in	O
+the	O
+2016	O
+election	O
+has	O
+been	O
+delivered	O
+to	O
+Attorney	O
+General	O
+William	O
+Barr	O
+.	O
+
+A	O
+senior	O
+Justice	O
+Department	O
+official	O
+said	O
+the	O
+report	O
+does	O
+not	O
+recommend	O
+any	O
+further	O
+indictments	O
+.	O
+
+Trump	O
+has	O
+maintained	O
+that	O
+he	O
+and	O
+his	O
+campaign	O
+did	O
+not	O
+collude	O
+with	O
+Russia	O
+during	O
+the	O
+2016	O
+campaign	O
+.	O
+
+His	O
+attorneys	O
+said	O
+Friday	O
+he	O
+expects	O
+the	O
+report	O
+will	O
+exonerate	O
+him	O
+.	O
+
+Barr	O
+has	O
+said	O
+he	O
+will	O
+write	O
+his	O
+own	O
+account	O
+of	O
+Mueller	O
+’s	O
+findings	O
+and	O
+communicate	O
+it	O
+to	O
+Congress	O
+and	O
+the	O
+American	O
+public	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+a	O
+letter	O
+to	O
+the	O
+leaders	O
+of	O
+the	O
+House	O
+and	O
+Senate	O
+Judiciary	O
+committees	O
+,	O
+Barr	O
+wrote	O
+he	O
+“	O
+may	O
+be	O
+in	O
+a	O
+position	O
+to	O
+advise	O
+you	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Special	O
+Counsel	O
+’s	O
+principal	O
+conclusions	O
+as	O
+soon	O
+as	O
+this	O
+weekend	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+White	O
+House	O
+press	O
+secretary	O
+Sarah	O
+Sanders	O
+tweeted	O
+Friday	O
+afternoon	O
+:	O
+“	O
+The	O
+next	O
+steps	O
+are	O
+up	O
+to	O
+Attorney	O
+General	O
+Barr	O
+,	O
+and	O
+we	O
+look	O
+forward	O
+to	O
+the	O
+process	O
+taking	O
+its	O
+course	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+White	O
+House	O
+has	O
+not	O
+received	O
+or	O
+been	O
+briefed	O
+on	O
+the	O
+Special	O
+Counsel	O
+’s	O
+report	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Barr	O
+,	O
+in	O
+his	O
+letter	O
+to	O
+congressional	O
+leaders	O
+,	O
+said	O
+Mueller	O
+’s	O
+investigation	O
+was	O
+conducted	O
+properly	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+attorney	O
+general	O
+said	O
+he	O
+was	O
+required	O
+to	O
+inform	O
+congressional	O
+leaders	O
+if	O
+Mueller	O
+had	O
+done	O
+anything	O
+“	O
+inappropriate	O
+or	O
+unwarranted	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+“	O
+There	O
+were	O
+no	O
+such	O
+instances	O
+during	O
+the	O
+Special	O
+Counsel	O
+’s	O
+investigation	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Barr	O
+wrote	O
+.	O
+
+Trump	O
+’s	O
+personal	O
+lawyers	O
+,	O
+Rudy	O
+Giuliani	O
+and	O
+Jay	O
+Sekulow	O
+,	O
+issued	O
+a	O
+statement	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+We	O
+’re	O
+pleased	O
+that	O
+the	O
+Office	O
+of	O
+Special	O
+Counsel	O
+has	O
+delivered	O
+its	O
+report	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Attorney	O
+General	O
+pursuant	O
+to	O
+the	O
+regulations	O
+.	O
+
+Attorney	O
+General	O
+Barr	O
+will	O
+determine	O
+the	O
+appropriate	O
+next	O
+steps	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Harvard	O
+law	O
+professor	O
+Alan	O
+Dershowitz	O
+cautioned	O
+in	O
+an	O
+interview	O
+with	O
+Fox	O
+News	O
+on	O
+Friday	O
+afternoon	O
+that	O
+the	O
+report	O
+is	O
+“	O
+a	O
+prosecutorial	O
+document	O
+presenting	O
+only	O
+one	O
+side	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+He	O
+urged	O
+the	O
+public	O
+“	O
+to	O
+withhold	O
+final	O
+judgment	O
+until	O
+they	O
+hear	O
+the	O
+other	O
+side	O
+of	O
+the	O
+story	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Trump	O
+:	O
+‘	O
+Let	O
+people	O
+see	O
+it	O
+’	O
+
+House	O
+Speaker	O
+Nancy	O
+Pelosi	O
+and	O
+Senate	O
+Democratic	O
+Leader	O
+Chuck	O
+Schumer	O
+released	O
+a	O
+joint	O
+statement	O
+insisting	O
+Barr	O
+release	O
+the	O
+full	O
+report	O
+to	O
+the	O
+public	O
+and	O
+not	O
+give	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+a	O
+“	O
+sneak	O
+preview	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+“	O
+Now	O
+that	O
+Special	O
+Counsel	O
+Mueller	O
+has	O
+submitted	O
+his	O
+report	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Attorney	O
+General	O
+,	O
+it	O
+is	O
+imperative	O
+for	O
+Mr.	O
+Barr	O
+to	O
+make	O
+the	O
+full	O
+report	O
+public	O
+and	O
+provide	O
+its	O
+underlying	O
+documentation	O
+and	O
+findings	O
+to	O
+Congress	O
+,	O
+”	O
+they	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Attorney	O
+General	O
+Barr	O
+must	O
+not	O
+give	O
+President	O
+Trump	O
+,	O
+his	O
+lawyers	O
+or	O
+his	O
+staff	O
+any	O
+‘	O
+sneak	O
+preview	O
+’	O
+of	O
+Special	O
+Counsel	O
+Mueller	O
+’s	O
+findings	O
+or	O
+evidence	O
+,	O
+and	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+must	O
+not	O
+be	O
+allowed	O
+to	O
+interfere	O
+in	O
+decisions	O
+about	O
+what	O
+parts	O
+of	O
+those	O
+findings	O
+or	O
+evidence	O
+are	O
+made	O
+public	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Democratic	O
+leaders	O
+said	O
+Mueller	O
+’s	O
+investigation	O
+“	O
+focused	O
+on	O
+questions	O
+that	O
+go	O
+to	O
+the	O
+integrity	O
+of	O
+our	O
+democracy	O
+itself	O
+:	O
+whether	O
+foreign	O
+powers	O
+corruptly	O
+interfered	O
+in	O
+our	B-PROP
+elections	O
+,	O
+and	O
+whether	O
+unlawful	O
+means	O
+were	O
+used	O
+to	O
+hinder	O
+that	O
+investigation	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+“	O
+The	B-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+have	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+right	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+truth	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+The	O
+watchword	O
+is	O
+transparency	O
+,	O
+”	O
+they	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+Trump	O
+said	O
+Wednesday	O
+he	O
+also	O
+wants	O
+to	O
+see	O
+the	O
+full	O
+report	O
+released	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Let	O
+it	O
+come	O
+out	O
+.	O
+
+Let	O
+people	O
+see	O
+it	O
+,	O
+”	O
+he	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+No	B-PROP
+collusion	I-PROP
+
+Mueller	O
+’s	O
+investigation	O
+,	O
+which	O
+began	O
+nearly	O
+two	O
+years	O
+ago	O
+,	O
+has	O
+resulted	O
+in	O
+200	O
+charges	O
+against	O
+34	O
+people	O
+and	O
+three	O
+Russian	O
+companies	O
+.	O
+
+Six	O
+former	O
+Trump	O
+advisers	O
+have	O
+been	O
+indicted	O
+for	O
+process	O
+crimes	O
+,	O
+including	O
+perjury	O
+.	O
+
+However	O
+,	O
+there	O
+have	O
+been	O
+no	O
+indictments	O
+related	O
+to	O
+alleged	O
+Trump	O
+campaign	O
+collusion	O
+with	O
+Russia	O
+.	O
+
+Trump	O
+has	O
+insisted	O
+from	O
+the	O
+beginning	O
+that	O
+the	O
+probe	O
+is	O
+a	O
+“	B-PROP
+witch	I-PROP
+hunt	I-PROP
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Rep.	O
+Mark	O
+Meadows	O
+,	O
+R	O
+-	O
+N.C.	O
+,	O
+who	O
+has	O
+investigated	O
+Russian	O
+interference	O
+as	O
+a	O
+member	O
+of	O
+the	O
+House	O
+Oversight	O
+and	O
+Government	O
+Reform	O
+Committee	O
+,	O
+has	O
+been	O
+a	O
+critic	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Mueller	O
+probe	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+The	O
+Mueller	O
+report	O
+delivery	O
+suggests	O
+no	O
+more	O
+indictments	O
+are	O
+coming	O
+from	O
+the	O
+Special	O
+Counsel	O
+.	O
+
+If	O
+that	O
+’s	O
+true	O
+,	O
+it	O
+would	O
+mean	O
+we	O
+just	O
+completed	O
+2	O
+years	O
+of	O
+investigating	O
+‘	O
+Russian	O
+collusion	O
+’	O
+without	O
+ONE	O
+collusion	O
+related	O
+indictment	O
+.	O
+
+Not	B-PROP
+even	I-PROP
+one	I-PROP
+,	O
+”	O
+he	O
+wrote	O
+on	O
+Twitter	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Why	O
+?	O
+
+Because	B-PROP
+there	I-PROP
+was	I-PROP
+no	I-PROP
+collusion	I-PROP
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Trump	O
+Kept	O
+Asking	O
+Friends	O
+If	O
+the	O
+Mueller	O
+Report	O
+Would	O
+Drop	O
+This	O
+Week	O
+
+On	O
+Wednesday	O
+,	O
+Donald	O
+Trump	O
+was	O
+flying	O
+to	O
+a	O
+military	O
+tank	O
+plant	O
+in	O
+Lima	O
+,	O
+Ohio	O
+,	O
+to	O
+deliver	O
+a	O
+speech	O
+on	O
+the	O
+economy	O
+,	O
+but	O
+,	O
+as	O
+is	O
+frequently	O
+the	O
+case	O
+,	O
+the	O
+president	O
+had	O
+something	O
+more	O
+pressing	O
+on	O
+his	O
+mind	O
+.	O
+
+While	O
+aboard	O
+Air	O
+Force	O
+One	O
+,	O
+the	O
+president	O
+killed	O
+some	O
+time	O
+by	O
+picking	O
+up	O
+the	O
+phone	O
+and	O
+ringing	O
+associates	O
+to	O
+ask	O
+them	O
+if	O
+they	O
+thought	O
+Special	O
+Counsel	O
+Robert	O
+Mueller	O
+’s	O
+report	O
+would	O
+be	O
+sent	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Department	O
+of	O
+Justice	O
+this	O
+week	O
+,	O
+according	O
+to	O
+a	O
+source	O
+with	O
+knowledge	O
+of	O
+these	O
+conversations	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+report	O
+,	O
+which	O
+would	O
+mark	O
+the	O
+culmination	O
+of	O
+Mueller	O
+and	O
+his	O
+team	O
+’s	O
+investigation	O
+into	O
+alleged	O
+Russian	O
+interference	O
+in	O
+the	O
+2016	O
+presidential	O
+election	O
+and	O
+potential	O
+obstruction	O
+of	O
+justice	O
+,	O
+has	O
+for	O
+many	O
+months	O
+kicked	O
+off	O
+round	O
+after	O
+round	O
+of	O
+speculation	O
+among	O
+the	O
+media	O
+and	O
+political	O
+class	O
+about	O
+when	O
+,	O
+exactly	O
+,	O
+it	O
+will	O
+finally	O
+be	O
+delivered	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Justice	O
+Department	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+week	O
+,	O
+the	O
+President	O
+of	O
+the	O
+United	O
+States	O
+himself	O
+joined	O
+in	O
+on	O
+the	O
+anxious	B-PROP
+anticipation	I-PROP
+and	O
+the	O
+Mueller	O
+report	O
+guessing	O
+game	O
+.	O
+
+According	O
+to	O
+three	O
+knowledgeable	O
+sources	O
+,	O
+Trump	O
+has	O
+quizzed	O
+various	O
+people	O
+—	O
+administration	O
+officials	O
+,	O
+friends	O
+,	O
+his	O
+legal	O
+team	O
+—	O
+throughout	O
+the	O
+week	O
+if	O
+they	O
+believed	O
+the	O
+buzz	O
+that	O
+the	O
+Mueller	O
+report	O
+could	O
+be	O
+delivered	O
+as	O
+soon	O
+as	O
+this	O
+week	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+president	O
+,	O
+these	O
+sources	O
+said	O
+,	O
+speculated	O
+on	O
+when	O
+he	O
+thought	O
+it	O
+would	O
+finally	O
+happen	O
+,	O
+repeatedly	O
+citing	O
+news	O
+reports	O
+from	O
+this	O
+week	O
+on	O
+a	O
+possible	O
+imminent	O
+delivery	O
+.	O
+
+Reached	O
+for	O
+comment	O
+,	O
+White	O
+House	O
+Press	O
+Secretary	O
+Sarah	O
+Huckabee	O
+Sanders	O
+replied	O
+that	O
+there	O
+was	O
+“	O
+nothing	O
+to	O
+add	O
+right	O
+now	O
+,	O
+”	O
+as	O
+of	O
+Friday	O
+afternoon	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+I	O
+told	O
+the	O
+president	O
+this	O
+morning	O
+[	O
+to	O
+]	O
+go	O
+about	O
+your	O
+schedule	O
+,	O
+we	O
+’re	O
+prepared	O
+for	O
+anything	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Rudy	O
+Giuliani	O
+,	O
+one	O
+of	O
+Trump	O
+’s	O
+personal	O
+attorneys	O
+,	O
+told	O
+The	O
+Daily	O
+Beast	O
+on	O
+Friday	O
+,	O
+adding	O
+that	O
+he	O
+spoke	O
+with	O
+the	O
+president	O
+in	O
+person	O
+on	O
+Thursday	O
+.	O
+
+Giuliani	O
+said	O
+that	O
+he	O
+and	O
+the	O
+president	O
+have	O
+been	O
+hearing	O
+the	O
+report	O
+delivery	O
+could	O
+happen	O
+“	O
+today	O
+,	O
+”	O
+but	O
+clarified	O
+that	O
+he	O
+and	O
+his	O
+client	O
+are	O
+going	O
+off	O
+of	O
+media	O
+,	O
+not	O
+any	O
+“	O
+insider	O
+information	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Trump	O
+’s	O
+reelection	O
+campaign	O
+also	O
+got	O
+in	O
+on	O
+this	O
+week	O
+’s	O
+speculation	B-PROP
+game	I-PROP
+,	O
+texting	O
+supporters	O
+early	O
+Friday	O
+afternoon	O
+,	O
+“	O
+President	B-PROP
+Trump	I-PROP
+has	B-PROP
+put	I-PROP
+up	I-PROP
+with	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+WITCH	I-PROP
+HUNT	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+2	I-PROP
+YEARS	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Do	O
+you	O
+think	O
+it	O
+'s	O
+time	O
+for	O
+it	O
+to	O
+end	O
+?	O
+
+Take	O
+our	O
+OFFICIAL	O
+poll	O
+NOW	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+The	O
+president	O
+,	O
+who	O
+has	O
+repeatedly	O
+claimed	O
+that	O
+the	O
+Mueller	O
+investigation	O
+is	O
+“	B-PROP
+illegal	I-PROP
+”	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+“	I-PROP
+WITCH	I-PROP
+HUNT	I-PROP
+”	I-PROP
+driven	I-PROP
+by	I-PROP
+angry	I-PROP
+liberals	I-PROP
+,	O
+made	O
+clear	O
+to	O
+reporters	O
+at	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+earlier	O
+this	O
+week	O
+that	O
+the	O
+coming	O
+report	O
+was	O
+,	O
+of	O
+course	O
+,	O
+weighing	O
+on	O
+him	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Let	O
+it	O
+come	O
+out	O
+,	O
+let	O
+people	O
+see	O
+it	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Trump	O
+said	O
+,	O
+characterizing	O
+the	O
+probe	O
+and	O
+report	O
+as	O
+“	O
+ridiculous	B-PROP
+,	O
+”	O
+as	O
+he	O
+left	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+on	O
+Wednesday	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Let	O
+’s	O
+see	O
+whether	O
+or	O
+not	O
+it	O
+’s	O
+legit	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+But	O
+over	O
+the	O
+course	O
+of	O
+the	O
+last	O
+two	O
+years	O
+,	O
+he	O
+has	O
+n’t	O
+always	O
+been	O
+so	O
+open	O
+to	O
+the	O
+report	O
+seeing	O
+the	O
+light	O
+of	O
+day	O
+,	O
+or	O
+even	O
+having	O
+the	O
+investigation	O
+conclude	O
+.	O
+
+As	O
+The	O
+New	O
+York	O
+Times	O
+reported	O
+early	O
+last	O
+year	O
+,	O
+Trump	O
+ordered	O
+the	O
+firing	O
+of	O
+the	O
+special	O
+counsel	O
+,	O
+but	O
+reversed	O
+course	O
+after	O
+the	O
+then	O
+-	O
+White	O
+House	O
+Counsel	O
+Don	O
+McGahn	O
+said	O
+he	O
+would	O
+resign	O
+instead	O
+of	O
+executing	O
+Trump	O
+’s	O
+order	O
+.	O
+
+Still	O
+,	O
+even	O
+after	O
+the	O
+Mueller	O
+probe	O
+officially	O
+wraps	O
+,	O
+it	O
+is	O
+very	O
+much	O
+the	O
+beginning	O
+,	O
+not	O
+a	O
+dramatic	O
+end	O
+,	O
+to	O
+Trumpworld	O
+’s	O
+wide	O
+-	O
+ranging	O
+legal	O
+woes	O
+.	O
+
+On	O
+Friday	O
+,	O
+The	O
+Washington	O
+Post	O
+reported	O
+that	O
+Democratic	O
+chairs	O
+of	O
+six	O
+different	O
+House	O
+committees	O
+investigating	O
+Trump	O
+and	O
+his	O
+allies	O
+are	O
+planning	O
+on	O
+asking	O
+the	O
+FBI	O
+,	O
+Department	O
+of	O
+Justice	O
+,	O
+and	O
+White	O
+House	O
+to	O
+preserve	O
+records	O
+provided	O
+to	O
+Mueller	O
+and	O
+his	O
+investigators	O
+.	O
+
+President	O
+Trump	O
+himself	O
+appears	O
+to	O
+realize	O
+that	O
+the	O
+end	O
+is	O
+nowhere	O
+near	O
+.	O
+
+As	O
+The	O
+Daily	O
+Beast	O
+reported	O
+last	O
+month	O
+,	O
+the	O
+president	O
+made	O
+clear	O
+to	O
+his	O
+outside	O
+legal	O
+team	O
+,	O
+which	O
+includes	O
+Giuliani	O
+and	O
+Jay	O
+Sekulow	O
+,	O
+that	O
+he	O
+wanted	O
+his	O
+attorneys	O
+sitting	O
+tight	O
+,	O
+even	O
+after	O
+the	O
+Mueller	O
+investigation	O
+is	O
+history	O
+.	O
+
+Trump	O
+broached	O
+the	O
+topic	O
+in	O
+multiple	O
+conversations	O
+beginning	O
+late	O
+last	O
+year	O
+,	O
+while	O
+discussing	O
+the	O
+other	O
+inquiries	O
+threatening	O
+his	O
+presidency	O
+and	O
+inner	O
+circle	O
+,	O
+chief	O
+among	O
+them	O
+the	O
+Southern	O
+District	O
+of	O
+New	O
+York	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+if	O
+the	O
+Mueller	O
+report	O
+is	O
+actually	O
+,	O
+finally	O
+sent	O
+over	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Justice	O
+Department	O
+by	O
+close	O
+of	O
+business	O
+on	O
+Friday	O
+,	O
+the	O
+president	O
+will	O
+be	O
+many	O
+miles	O
+away	O
+from	O
+it	O
+.	O
+
+On	O
+Friday	O
+morning	O
+,	O
+Trump	O
+flew	O
+to	O
+Palm	O
+Beach	O
+,	O
+Florida	O
+,	O
+where	O
+he	O
+and	O
+first	O
+lady	O
+Melania	O
+Trump	O
+were	O
+scheduled	O
+to	O
+meet	O
+with	O
+Caribbean	O
+leaders	O
+at	O
+Mar	O
+-	O
+a	O
+-	O
+Lago	O
+,	O
+the	O
+president	O
+’s	O
+private	O
+club	O
+and	O
+getaway	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Mueller	O
+Circus	O
+is	O
+Over	O
+,	O
+Long	B-PROP
+Live	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+Mueller	I-PROP
+Circus	I-PROP
+
+The	B-PROP
+Mueller	I-PROP
+circus	I-PROP
+cost	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+taxpayers	I-PROP
+millions	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+But	O
+it	O
+made	O
+the	O
+media	O
+ten	O
+times	O
+that	O
+more	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+fortunes	O
+that	O
+the	O
+Washington	O
+Post	O
+and	O
+the	O
+New	O
+York	O
+Times	O
+made	O
+on	O
+Mueller	O
+leaks	O
+and	O
+conspiracy	O
+theories	O
+are	O
+priceless	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Mueller	O
+report	O
+with	O
+its	O
+inevitable	B-PROP
+lies	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+smears	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+assaults	I-PROP
+from	O
+the	O
+Obama	O
+/	O
+Clinton	O
+team	O
+behind	O
+the	O
+grim	O
+face	O
+of	O
+Robert	O
+Mueller	O
+is	O
+in	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+media	O
+wo	O
+n't	O
+leave	O
+it	O
+there	O
+.	O
+
+After	O
+running	O
+through	O
+the	O
+entire	O
+process	O
+of	O
+making	O
+the	O
+report	O
+public	O
+which	O
+,	O
+one	O
+way	O
+or	O
+another	O
+,	O
+it	O
+will	O
+be	O
+,	O
+it	O
+will	O
+fasten	O
+on	O
+the	O
+various	O
+state	O
+investigations	O
+targeting	O
+Trump	O
+,	O
+his	O
+family	O
+members	O
+,	O
+his	O
+associates	O
+and	O
+anyone	O
+who	O
+ever	O
+met	O
+him	O
+since	O
+1989	O
+.	O
+
+These	O
+investigations	O
+will	O
+vie	O
+for	O
+status	O
+.	O
+
+Some	O
+will	O
+employ	O
+former	O
+Mueller	O
+coup	O
+members	O
+.	O
+
+They	B-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+used	I-PROP
+by	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+Democrats	I-PROP
+running	I-PROP
+them	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+fundraise	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+violation	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+all	I-PROP
+political	I-PROP
+norms	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+ethics	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+bringing	B-PROP
+us	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+much	I-PROP
+closer	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+proper	I-PROP
+Roman	I-PROP
+circus	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+The	O
+three	O
+goals	O
+of	O
+all	O
+this	O
+are	O
+simple	O
+.	O
+
+1	O
+.	O
+
+Keep	O
+the	O
+media	O
+happy	O
+and	O
+profitable	O
+
+2	O
+.	O
+
+Undermine	O
+President	O
+Trump	O
+and	O
+prevent	O
+him	O
+from	O
+implementing	O
+reforms	O
+.	O
+
+3	O
+.	O
+
+Punish	B-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+voting	I-PROP
+public	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+electing	I-PROP
+Trump	I-PROP
+
+Never	O
+underestimate	O
+the	O
+power	O
+of	O
+the	O
+swamp	B-PROP
+'s	O
+spite	O
+.	O
+
+Much	O
+of	O
+this	O
+is	O
+about	O
+self	O
+-	O
+defense	O
+.	O
+
+The	B-PROP
+more	I-PROP
+Trump	O
+is	O
+investigated	O
+,	O
+the	O
+less	O
+he	O
+can	O
+investigate	O
+,	O
+reform	O
+or	O
+implement	O
+changes	O
+to	O
+the	O
+swamp	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+plenty	O
+of	O
+it	O
+is	O
+about	O
+malice	B-PROP
+and	O
+spite	O
+.	O
+
+Culture	O
+wars	O
+are	O
+built	O
+on	O
+tribal	O
+rage	O
+.	O
+
+That	B-PROP
+'s	I-PROP
+what	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+"	I-PROP
+resistance	I-PROP
+"	I-PROP
+has	I-PROP
+always	I-PROP
+been	I-PROP
+about	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+Make	O
+full	O
+Mueller	O
+report	O
+public	O
+,	O
+Democratic	O
+candidates	O
+demand	O
+
+©	O
+Provided	O
+by	O
+Oath	O
+Inc.	O
+Attorney	O
+General	O
+William	O
+Barr	O
+leaves	O
+his	O
+home	O
+in	O
+McLean	O
+,	O
+Va.	O
+,	O
+on	O
+Friday	O
+,	O
+March	O
+22	O
+,	O
+2019	O
+.	O
+
+(	O
+AP	O
+Photo	O
+/	O
+Jose	O
+Luis	O
+Magana	O
+)	O
+
+Just	O
+minutes	O
+after	O
+special	O
+counsel	O
+Robert	O
+Mueller	O
+submitted	O
+his	O
+final	O
+report	O
+on	O
+his	O
+investigation	O
+into	O
+the	O
+2016	O
+Trump	O
+campaign	O
+’s	O
+ties	O
+to	O
+Russia	O
+to	O
+Attorney	O
+General	O
+William	O
+Barr	O
+,	O
+Democrats	O
+began	O
+pressuring	O
+the	O
+administration	O
+to	O
+make	O
+the	O
+findings	O
+public	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+a	O
+letter	O
+to	O
+Congress	O
+,	O
+Barr	O
+said	O
+that	O
+he	O
+could	O
+provide	O
+lawmakers	O
+with	O
+a	O
+summary	O
+of	O
+the	O
+findings	O
+“	O
+as	O
+soon	O
+as	O
+this	O
+weekend	O
+,	O
+”	O
+but	O
+for	O
+several	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Democrats	O
+seeking	O
+to	O
+replace	O
+Trump	O
+in	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+,	O
+that	O
+was	O
+n’t	O
+sufficient	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+report	O
+should	O
+be	O
+made	O
+public	O
+immediately	O
+.	O
+
+https://t.co/Q2JCExqYaA	O
+—	O
+Cory	O
+Booker	O
+(	O
+@CoryBooker	O
+)	O
+March	O
+22	O
+,	O
+2019	O
+
+The	B-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+deserve	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+know	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+full	I-PROP
+truth	I-PROP
+about	I-PROP
+Russia	I-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+interference	I-PROP
+in	O
+our	B-PROP
+democracy	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Special	O
+Counsel	O
+report	O
+must	O
+be	O
+publicly	O
+released	O
+in	O
+its	O
+entirety	O
+.	O
+
+https://t.co/Q5OT6zPpOg	O
+—	O
+Julián	O
+Castro	O
+(	O
+@JulianCastro	O
+)	O
+March	O
+22	O
+,	O
+2019	O
+
+Attorney	O
+General	O
+Barr	O
+—	O
+release	O
+the	O
+Mueller	O
+report	O
+to	O
+the	O
+American	O
+public	O
+.	O
+
+Now	O
+.	O
+
+https://t.co/sqz8eoTjLD	O
+—	O
+Elizabeth	O
+Warren	O
+(	O
+@ewarren	O
+)	O
+March	O
+22	O
+,	O
+2019	O
+
+Special	O
+counsel	O
+Mueller	O
+’s	O
+report	O
+should	O
+be	O
+made	O
+public	O
+without	O
+any	O
+delay	O
+.	O
+
+The	B-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+have	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+right	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+know	I-PROP
+its	I-PROP
+findings	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+—	O
+Kirsten	O
+Gillibrand	O
+(	O
+@SenGillibrand	O
+)	O
+March	O
+22	O
+,	O
+2019	O
+
+The	O
+liberal	O
+activist	O
+group	O
+MoveOn.org	O
+issued	O
+a	O
+statement	O
+just	O
+as	O
+news	O
+that	O
+Mueller	O
+’s	O
+report	O
+had	O
+been	O
+submitted	O
+was	O
+breaking	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Should	O
+Barr	O
+announce	O
+his	O
+intention	O
+to	O
+cover	O
+up	O
+Mueller	O
+’s	O
+report	O
+,	O
+we	O
+would	O
+take	O
+to	O
+the	O
+streets	O
+in	O
+‘	O
+Trump	B-PROP
+Is	I-PROP
+Not	I-PROP
+Above	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+Law	I-PROP
+’	O
+rapid	O
+-	O
+response	O
+protests	O
+around	O
+the	O
+country	O
+,	O
+”	O
+the	O
+group	O
+’s	O
+statement	O
+read	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+We	O
+will	O
+not	O
+allow	O
+Trump	O
+or	O
+his	O
+hand	O
+-	O
+picked	O
+attorney	O
+general	O
+to	O
+get	O
+away	O
+with	O
+obstructing	O
+this	O
+criminal	O
+investigation	O
+,	O
+and	O
+we	O
+will	O
+not	O
+allow	O
+Congress	O
+to	O
+abdicate	O
+its	O
+responsibility	O
+under	O
+the	O
+Constitution	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+During	O
+his	O
+January	O
+confirmation	O
+hearings	O
+before	O
+the	O
+Senate	O
+Judiciary	O
+Committee	O
+,	O
+Barr	O
+testified	O
+that	O
+he	O
+would	O
+“	O
+provide	O
+as	O
+much	O
+transparency	O
+”	O
+as	O
+he	O
+could	O
+regarding	O
+Mueller	O
+’s	O
+report	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+I	O
+also	O
+believe	O
+it	O
+is	O
+very	O
+important	O
+that	O
+the	O
+public	O
+and	O
+Congress	O
+be	O
+informed	O
+of	O
+the	O
+results	O
+of	O
+the	O
+special	O
+counsel	O
+’s	O
+work	O
+.	O
+
+For	O
+that	O
+reason	O
+my	O
+goal	O
+will	O
+be	O
+to	O
+provide	O
+as	O
+much	O
+transparency	O
+as	O
+I	O
+can	O
+consistent	O
+with	O
+the	O
+law	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Barr	O
+told	O
+the	O
+committee	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+I	O
+can	O
+assure	O
+you	O
+that	O
+,	O
+where	O
+judgments	O
+are	O
+to	O
+be	O
+made	O
+by	O
+me	O
+,	O
+I	O
+will	O
+make	O
+those	O
+judgments	O
+based	O
+solely	O
+on	O
+the	O
+law	O
+and	O
+will	O
+let	O
+no	O
+personal	O
+,	O
+political	O
+or	O
+other	O
+improper	O
+interests	O
+influence	O
+my	O
+decision	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+_	O
+_	O
+_	O
+_	O
+_	O
+
+Read	O
+more	O
+from	O
+Yahoo	O
+News	O
+:	O
+
+Kamala	O
+Harris	O
+calls	O
+for	O
+AG	O
+Barr	O
+to	O
+testify	O
+on	O
+Mueller	O
+probe	O
+,	O
+as	O
+2020	B-PROP
+Dems	I-PROP
+seize	O
+on	O
+report	O
+drop	O
+
+The	O
+Democratic	O
+presidential	O
+contenders	O
+are	O
+uniformly	O
+calling	O
+for	O
+Special	O
+Counsel	O
+Robert	O
+Mueller	O
+’s	O
+report	O
+on	O
+Russian	O
+tampering	O
+in	O
+the	O
+2016	O
+presidential	O
+election	O
+to	O
+be	O
+released	O
+publicly	O
+–	O
+while	O
+at	O
+least	O
+one	O
+high	O
+-	O
+profile	O
+candidate	O
+wants	O
+Attorney	O
+General	O
+Bill	O
+Barr	O
+to	O
+testify	O
+on	O
+the	O
+findings	O
+.	O
+
+Minutes	O
+after	O
+the	O
+news	O
+broke	O
+Friday	O
+afternoon	O
+that	O
+the	O
+long	O
+-	O
+awaited	O
+report	O
+had	O
+been	O
+submitted	O
+to	O
+Barr	O
+,	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+hopefuls	O
+quickly	O
+fired	O
+off	O
+statements	O
+calling	O
+for	O
+the	O
+Trump	O
+administration	O
+to	O
+ensure	O
+the	O
+documents	O
+go	O
+public	O
+.	O
+
+TRUMP	O
+TEAM	O
+CONFIDENT	O
+AFTER	O
+MUELLER	O
+REPORT	O
+DROP	O
+
+“	O
+Attorney	O
+General	O
+Barr	O
+—	O
+release	O
+the	O
+Mueller	O
+report	O
+to	O
+the	O
+American	O
+public	O
+.	O
+
+Now	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Sen.	O
+Elizabeth	O
+Warren	O
+of	O
+Massachusetts	O
+tweeted	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+As	O
+Donald	O
+Trump	O
+said	O
+,	O
+‘	O
+Let	O
+it	O
+come	O
+out	O
+.	O
+’	O
+I	O
+call	O
+on	O
+the	O
+Trump	O
+administration	O
+to	O
+make	O
+Special	O
+Counsel	O
+Mueller	O
+'s	O
+full	O
+report	O
+public	O
+as	O
+soon	O
+as	O
+possible	O
+.	O
+
+No	B-PROP
+one	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+including	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+president	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+above	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+law	I-PROP
+,	O
+”	O
+Sen.	O
+Bernie	O
+Sanders	O
+of	O
+Vermont	O
+wrote	O
+on	O
+Twitter	O
+.	O
+
+Sen.	O
+Kamala	O
+Harris	O
+of	O
+California	O
+called	O
+for	O
+“	O
+total	O
+transparency	O
+”	O
+–	O
+then	O
+upped	O
+the	O
+ante	O
+by	O
+calling	O
+on	O
+Barr	O
+to	O
+testify	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+The	O
+Department	O
+of	O
+Justice	O
+launched	O
+the	O
+Special	O
+Counsel	O
+investigation	O
+to	O
+get	O
+to	O
+the	O
+bottom	O
+of	O
+foreign	O
+interference	O
+in	O
+the	O
+2016	O
+election	O
+and	O
+any	O
+other	O
+illegal	O
+actions	O
+.	O
+
+A	O
+declassified	O
+report	O
+must	O
+be	O
+made	O
+public	O
+immediately	O
+and	O
+Attorney	O
+General	O
+Barr	O
+must	O
+publicly	O
+testify	O
+under	O
+oath	O
+about	O
+the	O
+investigation	O
+and	O
+its	O
+findings	O
+,	O
+and	O
+provide	O
+all	O
+underlying	O
+materials	O
+to	O
+the	O
+appropriate	O
+Congressional	O
+committees	O
+,	O
+”	O
+the	O
+former	O
+California	O
+attorney	O
+general	O
+said	O
+in	O
+a	O
+statement	O
+.	O
+
+Harris	O
+,	O
+Warren	O
+and	O
+Sen.	O
+Cory	O
+Booker	O
+of	O
+New	O
+Jersey	O
+have	O
+all	O
+started	O
+petitions	O
+to	O
+pressure	O
+the	O
+administration	O
+to	O
+release	O
+the	O
+report	O
+–	O
+though	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+has	O
+deferred	O
+to	O
+Barr	O
+on	O
+next	O
+steps	O
+.	O
+
+Booker	O
+also	O
+is	O
+using	O
+the	O
+report	O
+drop	O
+to	O
+raise	O
+money	O
+for	O
+his	O
+campaign	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+This	O
+report	O
+should	O
+be	O
+made	O
+public	O
+immediately	O
+,	O
+”	O
+he	O
+tweeted	O
+.	O
+
+MUELLER	O
+NOT	O
+RECOMMENDING	O
+MORE	O
+INDICTMENTS	O
+:	O
+SOURCE	O
+
+It	O
+was	O
+a	O
+similar	O
+sentiment	O
+on	O
+Twitter	O
+from	O
+former	O
+Rep.	O
+Beto	O
+O’Rourke	O
+of	O
+Texas	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Release	O
+the	O
+Mueller	O
+report	O
+to	O
+the	B-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+,	O
+”	O
+he	O
+wrote	O
+.	O
+
+Sen.	O
+Kirsten	O
+Gillibrand	O
+of	O
+New	O
+York	O
+said	O
+,	O
+“	O
+report	O
+should	O
+be	O
+made	O
+public	O
+without	O
+any	O
+delay	O
+.	O
+
+The	B-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+have	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+right	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+know	I-PROP
+its	I-PROP
+findings	I-PROP
+.	O
+”	O
+
+And	O
+Sen.	O
+Amy	O
+Klobuchar	O
+tweeted	O
+“	O
+BREAKING	O
+:	O
+The	O
+Mueller	O
+report	O
+is	O
+complete	O
+.	O
+
+Attorney	O
+General	O
+Barr	O
+must	O
+release	O
+the	O
+full	O
+report	O
+to	O
+the	O
+public	O
+.	O
+
+The	B-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+deserve	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+know	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+facts	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+”	O
+
+Mueller	O
+was	O
+appointed	O
+nearly	O
+two	O
+years	O
+ago	O
+to	O
+investigate	O
+the	O
+election	O
+tampering	O
+and	O
+any	O
+possible	O
+collusion	O
+between	O
+Moscow	O
+and	O
+Trump	O
+’s	O
+2016	O
+campaign	O
+to	O
+swing	O
+the	O
+presidential	O
+election	O
+in	O
+the	O
+then	O
+-	O
+GOP	O
+nominee	O
+’s	O
+favor	O
+.	O
+
+Barr	O
+and	O
+his	O
+team	O
+are	O
+now	O
+reviewing	O
+the	O
+report	O
+and	O
+creating	O
+a	O
+summary	O
+document	O
+that	O
+will	O
+be	O
+sent	O
+to	O
+Congress	O
+,	O
+and	O
+possibly	O
+released	O
+.	O
+
+Former	O
+San	O
+Antonio	O
+,	O
+Texas	O
+mayor	O
+and	O
+former	O
+Housing	O
+and	O
+Urban	O
+Development	O
+Secretary	O
+Julian	O
+Castro	O
+tweeted	O
+that	O
+the	B-PROP
+“	I-PROP
+American	B-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+deserve	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+know	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+full	I-PROP
+truth	I-PROP
+about	I-PROP
+Russia	I-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+interference	I-PROP
+in	O
+our	B-PROP
+democracy	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+The	O
+Special	O
+Counsel	O
+report	O
+must	O
+be	O
+publicly	O
+released	O
+in	O
+its	O
+entirety	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Former	O
+three	O
+-	O
+term	O
+Rep.	O
+John	O
+Delaney	O
+wrote	O
+the	B-PROP
+“	I-PROP
+patriotic	I-PROP
+action	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+Attorney	I-PROP
+General	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+release	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+entire	I-PROP
+Mueller	I-PROP
+Report	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+We	O
+paid	O
+for	O
+it	O
+and	O
+this	O
+moment	O
+requires	O
+transparency	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+CNN	O
+Reacts	O
+to	O
+Mueller	O
+News	O
+:	O
+‘	O
+Huge	B-PROP
+Victory	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+the	O
+President	O
+,	O
+’	O
+Trump	O
+‘	O
+Vindicated	O
+’	O
+
+A	O
+panel	O
+on	O
+CNN	O
+’s	O
+Situation	O
+Room	O
+With	O
+Wolf	O
+Blitzer	O
+reacted	O
+live	O
+on	O
+air	O
+to	O
+news	O
+that	O
+the	O
+Mueller	O
+report	O
+has	O
+concluded	O
+and	O
+resulted	O
+in	O
+no	O
+new	O
+indictments	O
+by	O
+admitting	O
+that	O
+President	O
+Trump	O
+has	O
+won	O
+a	O
+“	O
+huge	B-PROP
+victory	I-PROP
+.	O
+”	O
+
+“	O
+He	O
+’s	O
+been	O
+vindicated	O
+by	O
+them	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Evan	O
+Pérez	O
+said	O
+of	O
+President	O
+Trump	O
+and	O
+the	O
+Mueller	O
+report	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+And	O
+then	O
+he	O
+’s	O
+now	O
+vindicated	O
+,	O
+exactly	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Gloria	O
+Borger	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+You	O
+know	O
+–	O
+how	O
+do	O
+you	O
+manage	O
+that	O
+politically	O
+?	O
+
+I	O
+mean	O
+,	O
+we	O
+obviously	O
+ca	O
+n’t	O
+jump	O
+the	O
+gun	O
+here	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+have	O
+to	O
+see	O
+what	O
+comes	O
+out	O
+from	O
+Barr	O
+,	O
+and	O
+what	O
+’s	O
+in	O
+the	O
+report	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+if	O
+I	O
+’m	O
+at	O
+Mar	O
+-	O
+A	O
+-	O
+Lago	O
+with	O
+the	O
+president	O
+,	O
+as	O
+Pamela	O
+has	O
+been	O
+reporting	O
+,	O
+the	O
+lawyers	O
+are	O
+…	O
+that	O
+I	O
+would	O
+be	O
+very	O
+happy	O
+,	O
+”	O
+she	O
+added	O
+.	O
+
+Later	O
+,	O
+a	O
+panel	O
+member	O
+concluded	O
+that	O
+the	O
+Mueller	O
+report	O
+was	O
+in	O
+fact	O
+a	O
+“	O
+huge	B-PROP
+victory	I-PROP
+”	O
+for	O
+President	O
+Trump	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+A	O
+couple	O
+of	O
+victories	O
+here	O
+,	O
+”	O
+CNN	O
+’s	O
+Shimon	O
+Prokupecz	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+The	O
+president	O
+did	O
+not	O
+have	O
+to	O
+sit	O
+down	O
+for	O
+an	O
+interview	O
+.	O
+
+They	O
+were	O
+so	O
+concerned	O
+about	O
+that	O
+,	O
+because	O
+he	O
+’d	O
+get	O
+caught	O
+up	O
+in	O
+lies	O
+–	O
+and	O
+there	O
+’d	O
+be	O
+perjury	O
+traps	O
+.	O
+
+Okay	O
+,	O
+so	O
+that	O
+’s	O
+now	O
+over	O
+.	O
+
+No	O
+more	O
+people	O
+being	O
+indicted	O
+.	O
+
+Sealed	O
+,	O
+unsealed	O
+–	O
+no	O
+more	O
+indictments	O
+.	O
+
+Mueller	O
+is	O
+done	O
+.	O
+
+Huge	B-PROP
+victory	I-PROP
+for	O
+the	O
+president	O
+,	O
+”	O
+he	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+Special	O
+counsel	O
+Robert	O
+Mueller	O
+concluded	O
+the	O
+Russia	O
+investigation	O
+and	O
+turned	O
+over	O
+his	O
+report	O
+to	O
+Attorney	O
+General	O
+Willian	O
+Barr	O
+Friday	O
+afternoon	O
+.	O
+
+According	O
+to	O
+multiple	O
+reports	O
+,	O
+there	O
+will	O
+be	O
+no	O
+further	O
+indictments	O
+in	O
+the	O
+report	O
+,	O
+sealed	O
+or	O
+unsealed	O
+.	O
+
+Important	O
+:	O
+No	O
+more	O
+sealed	O
+or	O
+unsealed	O
+indictments	O
+coming	O
+from	O
+Robert	O
+Mueller	O
+a	O
+DOJ	O
+officials	O
+tells	O
+@LauraAJarrett	O
+—	O
+Shimon	O
+Prokupecz	O
+(	O
+@ShimonPro	O
+)	O
+March	O
+22	O
+,	O
+2019	O
+
+WASHINGTON	O
+(	O
+AP	O
+)	O
+—	O
+AP	O
+Source	O
+:	O
+Special	O
+counsel	O
+Robert	O
+Mueller	O
+is	O
+not	O
+recommending	O
+any	O
+further	O
+indictments	O
+in	O
+the	O
+Russia	O
+probe	O
+.	O
+
+—	O
+Zeke	O
+Miller	O
+(	O
+@ZekeJMiller	O
+)	O
+March	O
+22	O
+,	O
+2019	O
+
+According	O
+to	O
+ABC	O
+News	O
+,	O
+President	O
+Trump	O
+is	O
+reportedly	O
+“	O
+glad	O
+it	O
+’s	O
+over	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Dems	O
+in	O
+Congress	O
+Demand	O
+Barr	O
+Release	O
+Full	O
+Mueller	O
+Report	O
+‘	O
+Without	O
+Delay	O
+’	O
+
+Democrats	O
+on	O
+six	O
+House	O
+committees	O
+—	O
+including	O
+Judiciary	O
+Chairman	O
+Jerry	O
+Nadler	O
+(	O
+D	O
+-	O
+NY	O
+)	O
+,	O
+Oversight	O
+chair	O
+Elijah	O
+Cummings	O
+(	O
+D	O
+-	O
+MD	O
+)	O
+,	O
+and	O
+Intelligence	O
+chair	O
+Adam	O
+Schiff	O
+(	O
+D	O
+-	O
+CA)—are	O
+demanding	O
+that	O
+the	O
+Justice	O
+Department	O
+release	O
+Special	O
+Counsel	O
+Robert	O
+Mueller	O
+’s	O
+full	O
+report	O
+“	O
+without	O
+delay	O
+.	O
+”	O
+According	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Associated	O
+Press	O
+,	O
+the	O
+Democrats	O
+said	O
+they	O
+expect	O
+Attorney	O
+General	O
+William	O
+Barr	O
+to	O
+turn	O
+over	O
+all	O
+the	O
+evidence	O
+Mueller	O
+has	O
+collected	O
+in	O
+his	O
+probe	O
+into	O
+potential	O
+Russian	O
+collusion	O
+in	O
+the	O
+2016	O
+election	O
+.	O
+
+If	O
+not	O
+,	O
+the	O
+lawmakers	O
+said	O
+it	O
+“	O
+would	O
+raise	O
+serious	B-PROP
+questions	I-PROP
+about	I-PROP
+whether	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+Department	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+Justice	I-PROP
+policy	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+being	I-PROP
+used	I-PROP
+as	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+pretext	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+cover	I-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+up	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+misconduct	I-PROP
+.	O
+”	O
+The	O
+hashtag	O
+“	O
+#	O
+ReleaseTheReport	O
+”	O
+was	O
+also	O
+utilized	O
+on	O
+Twitter	O
+among	O
+Democrats	O
+,	O
+including	O
+House	O
+Speaker	O
+Nancy	O
+Pelosi	O
+(	O
+D	O
+-	O
+CA	O
+)	O
+,	O
+who	O
+warned	O
+Barr	O
+against	O
+giving	O
+President	O
+Trump	O
+or	O
+members	O
+of	O
+his	O
+legal	O
+team	O
+a	O
+“	O
+sneak	O
+preview	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Earlier	O
+Friday	O
+,	O
+the	O
+AP	O
+reported	O
+that	O
+Trump	O
+attorney	O
+Rudy	O
+Giuliani	O
+said	O
+the	O
+president	O
+’s	O
+lawyers	O
+wanted	O
+an	O
+early	O
+look	O
+at	O
+Mueller	O
+’s	O
+findings	O
+before	O
+they	O
+were	O
+made	O
+public	O
+.	O
+
+Giuliani	O
+later	O
+disputed	O
+that	O
+reporting	O
+in	O
+comments	O
+to	O
+The	O
+Daily	O
+Beast	O
+,	O
+saying	O
+the	O
+matter	O
+“	O
+will	O
+be	O
+handled	O
+properly	O
+”	O
+and	O
+it	O
+’s	O
+“	O
+up	O
+to	O
+DOJ	O
+.	O
+”	O
+The	O
+White	O
+House	O
+had	O
+earlier	O
+issued	O
+a	O
+statement	O
+saying	O
+it	O
+was	O
+looking	O
+“	O
+forward	O
+”	O
+to	O
+the	O
+next	O
+steps	O
+after	O
+Mueller	O
+handed	O
+in	O
+his	O
+report	O
+and	O
+noting	O
+that	O
+the	O
+administration	O
+“	O
+has	O
+not	O
+received	O
+or	O
+been	O
+briefed	O
+on	O
+the	O
+Special	O
+Counsel	O
+’s	O
+report	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Robert	O
+Mueller	O
+Not	O
+Recommending	O
+Any	O
+More	O
+Indictments	O
+
+Special	O
+counsel	O
+Robert	O
+Mueller	O
+will	O
+not	O
+recommend	O
+any	O
+more	O
+indictments	O
+as	O
+part	O
+of	O
+his	O
+investigation	O
+,	O
+the	O
+Justice	O
+Department	O
+announced	O
+Friday	O
+evening	O
+.	O
+
+A	O
+senior	O
+Justice	O
+Department	O
+official	O
+announced	O
+the	O
+development	O
+shortly	O
+after	O
+the	O
+special	O
+counsel	O
+submitted	O
+its	O
+final	O
+report	O
+to	O
+U.S.	O
+Attorney	O
+General	O
+William	O
+Barr	O
+.	O
+
+Barr	O
+will	O
+now	O
+review	O
+the	O
+report	O
+and	O
+write	O
+his	O
+own	O
+report	O
+on	O
+Mueller	O
+’s	O
+findings	O
+and	O
+present	O
+them	O
+to	O
+Congress	O
+as	O
+soon	O
+as	O
+this	O
+weekend	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+I	O
+am	O
+reviewing	O
+the	O
+report	O
+and	O
+anticipate	O
+that	O
+I	O
+may	O
+be	O
+in	O
+a	O
+position	O
+to	O
+advise	O
+you	O
+of	O
+the	O
+special	O
+counsel	O
+’s	O
+principal	O
+conclusions	O
+as	O
+soon	O
+as	O
+this	O
+weekend	O
+,	O
+”	O
+the	O
+attorney	O
+general	O
+wrote	O
+in	O
+a	O
+letter	O
+to	O
+Republican	O
+and	O
+Democrat	O
+leaders	O
+on	O
+the	O
+House	O
+and	O
+Senate	O
+Judiciary	O
+Committees	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+also	O
+said	O
+at	O
+no	O
+time	O
+did	O
+the	O
+Justice	O
+Department	O
+prevent	O
+Mueller	O
+from	O
+any	O
+actions	O
+he	O
+sought	O
+to	O
+make	O
+during	O
+the	O
+course	O
+of	O
+his	O
+investigation	O
+.	O
+
+President	O
+Trump	O
+’s	O
+initial	O
+reaction	O
+to	O
+news	O
+of	O
+the	O
+report	O
+’s	O
+delivery	O
+is	O
+that	O
+he	O
+is	O
+“	O
+glad	O
+it	O
+’s	O
+over	O
+,	O
+”	O
+reported	O
+ABC	O
+News	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+a	O
+separate	O
+statement	O
+,	O
+Trump	O
+lawyers	O
+Rudy	O
+Giuliani	O
+and	O
+Jay	O
+Sekulow	O
+said:“We’re	O
+pleased	O
+that	O
+the	O
+Office	O
+of	O
+Special	O
+Counsel	O
+has	O
+delivered	O
+its	O
+report	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Attorney	O
+General	O
+pursuant	O
+to	O
+the	O
+regulations	O
+.	O
+
+Attorney	O
+General	O
+Barr	O
+will	O
+determine	O
+the	O
+appropriate	O
+next	O
+steps	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Following	O
+confirmation	O
+of	O
+the	O
+report	O
+’s	O
+delivery	O
+,	O
+several	O
+top	O
+Democrat	O
+lawmakers	O
+demanded	O
+its	O
+immediate	O
+public	O
+release	O
+.	O
+
+Sen.	O
+Mark	O
+Warner	O
+(	O
+D	O
+-	O
+VA	O
+)	O
+,	O
+the	O
+top	O
+Democrat	O
+on	O
+the	O
+Senate	O
+Intelligence	O
+Committee	O
+,	O
+said	O
+Mueller	O
+’s	O
+findings	O
+“	O
+must	O
+be	O
+provided	O
+to	O
+Congress	O
+immediately	O
+,	O
+and	O
+the	B-PROP
+Attorney	I-PROP
+General	I-PROP
+should	I-PROP
+swiftly	I-PROP
+prepare	I-PROP
+a	O
+declassified	O
+version	O
+for	O
+the	O
+public	O
+.	O
+
+Nothing	B-PROP
+short	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+suffice	I-PROP
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Senate	O
+Minority	O
+Leader	O
+Chuck	O
+Schumer	O
+(	O
+D	O
+-	O
+NY	O
+)	O
+and	O
+House	O
+Speaker	O
+Nancy	O
+Pelosi	O
+(	O
+D	O
+-	O
+CA	O
+)	O
+echoed	O
+Warner	O
+’s	O
+remarks	O
+,	O
+stating	O
+:	O
+“	O
+It	O
+is	O
+imperative	O
+for	O
+Mr.	O
+Barr	O
+to	O
+make	O
+the	O
+full	O
+report	O
+public	O
+and	O
+provide	O
+its	O
+underlying	O
+documentation	O
+and	O
+findings	O
+to	O
+Congress	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Sen.	O
+Chuck	O
+Grassley	O
+(	O
+R	O
+-	O
+IA	O
+)	O
+,	O
+the	O
+former	O
+chair	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Senate	O
+’s	O
+Judiciary	O
+Committee	O
+,	O
+said	O
+in	O
+a	O
+statement	O
+“	O
+that	O
+we	O
+still	O
+have	O
+n’t	O
+seen	O
+any	O
+evidence	O
+of	O
+collusion	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+“	O
+Republicans	O
+and	O
+Democrats	O
+have	O
+roundly	O
+praised	O
+Mueller	O
+’s	O
+reputation	O
+for	O
+integrity	O
+and	O
+thoroughness	O
+.	O
+
+Now	O
+that	O
+he	O
+’s	O
+wrapped	O
+up	O
+his	O
+investigation	O
+,	O
+Attorney	O
+General	O
+Barr	O
+must	O
+provide	O
+Congress	O
+and	O
+the	B-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+with	O
+the	O
+findings	O
+to	O
+finally	O
+put	B-PROP
+an	I-PROP
+end	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+speculation	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+innuendo	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+has	I-PROP
+loomed	I-PROP
+over	I-PROP
+this	I-PROP
+administration	I-PROP
+since	I-PROP
+its	I-PROP
+earliest	I-PROP
+days	I-PROP
+,	O
+”	O
+Grassley	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Attempts	B-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+keep	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+collusion	I-PROP
+narrative	I-PROP
+alive	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+especially	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+political	I-PROP
+reasons	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+only	I-PROP
+serve	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+further	I-PROP
+harm	I-PROP
+our	I-PROP
+political	I-PROP
+discourse	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+play	I-PROP
+into	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+hands	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+our	I-PROP
+foreign	I-PROP
+adversaries	I-PROP
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Reports	O
+:	O
+No	O
+New	O
+Indictments	O
+Will	O
+Come	O
+From	O
+Special	O
+Counsel	O
+Robert	O
+Mueller	O
+’s	O
+Probe	O
+
+No	O
+new	O
+indictments	O
+will	O
+come	O
+from	O
+Special	O
+Counsel	O
+Robert	O
+Mueller	O
+’s	O
+Russia	O
+probe	O
+after	O
+he	O
+submitted	O
+his	O
+final	O
+report	O
+to	O
+Attorney	O
+General	O
+William	O
+Barr	O
+,	O
+multiple	O
+outlets	O
+are	O
+reporting	O
+.	O
+
+A	O
+senior	O
+Justice	O
+Department	O
+official	O
+told	O
+The	O
+Washington	O
+Post	O
+that	O
+Mueller	O
+“	O
+has	O
+not	O
+recommended	O
+any	O
+further	O
+indictments	O
+.	O
+”	O
+“	O
+The	O
+investigation	O
+is	O
+complete	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Justice	O
+Department	O
+spokeswoman	O
+Kerri	O
+Kupec	O
+told	O
+the	O
+newspaper	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Mueller	O
+probe	O
+saw	O
+several	O
+within	O
+Trump	O
+'s	O
+orbit	O
+indicted	O
+,	O
+but	O
+not	O
+Trump	O
+’s	O
+family	O
+or	O
+Trump	O
+himself	O
+.	O
+
+Some	O
+notable	O
+figures	O
+who	O
+have	O
+pleaded	O
+guilty	O
+in	O
+charges	O
+stemming	O
+from	O
+Mueller	O
+’s	O
+investigation	O
+are	O
+Trump	O
+’s	O
+former	O
+personal	O
+attorney	O
+Michael	O
+Cohen	O
+,	O
+Trump	O
+’s	O
+former	O
+campaign	O
+chairman	O
+Paul	O
+Manafort	O
+,	O
+and	O
+former	O
+White	O
+House	O
+National	O
+Security	O
+Adviser	O
+Michael	O
+Flynn	O
+.	O
+
+White	O
+House	O
+Restores	O
+CNN	O
+Acosta	O
+’s	O
+Pass	O
+But	O
+Imposes	O
+Strict	O
+Conduct	O
+Rules	O
+
+Thanks	O
+to	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+,	O
+all	O
+White	O
+House	O
+correspondents	O
+have	O
+to	O
+adhere	O
+to	O
+the	O
+new	O
+rules	O
+.	O
+
+CNN	O
+’s	O
+White	O
+House	O
+correspondent	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+will	O
+get	O
+his	O
+“	O
+hard	O
+pass	O
+”	O
+restored	O
+,	O
+but	O
+thanks	O
+to	O
+his	O
+antics	O
+and	O
+confrontations	O
+with	O
+President	O
+Trump	O
+and	O
+White	O
+House	O
+press	O
+secretary	O
+Sarah	O
+Huckabee	O
+Sanders	O
+,	O
+all	O
+journalists	O
+seeking	O
+access	O
+to	O
+the	O
+presidential	O
+press	O
+room	O
+will	O
+now	O
+have	O
+to	O
+abide	O
+by	O
+written	O
+rules	O
+of	O
+conduct	O
+due	O
+to	O
+his	O
+misbehavior	B-PROP
+.	O
+
+Sanders	O
+and	O
+deputy	O
+chief	O
+of	O
+staff	O
+for	O
+communications	O
+Bill	O
+Shine	O
+sent	O
+a	O
+letter	O
+to	O
+Acosta	O
+on	O
+Monday	O
+,	O
+notifying	O
+him	O
+that	O
+his	O
+hard	O
+pass	O
+was	O
+restored	O
+,	O
+but	O
+that	O
+it	O
+could	O
+be	O
+suspended	O
+or	O
+revoked	O
+again	O
+if	O
+he	O
+fails	O
+to	O
+abide	O
+by	O
+the	O
+new	O
+rules	O
+that	O
+apply	O
+to	O
+all	O
+White	O
+House	O
+correspondents	O
+going	O
+forward	O
+.	O
+
+Under	O
+the	O
+rules	O
+laid	O
+out	O
+in	O
+the	O
+letter	O
+,	O
+each	O
+journalist	O
+gets	O
+“	O
+a	O
+single	O
+question	O
+”	O
+before	O
+having	O
+to	O
+yield	O
+the	O
+floor	O
+,	O
+with	O
+follow	O
+-	O
+ups	O
+solely	O
+at	O
+the	O
+discretion	O
+of	O
+White	O
+House	O
+officials	O
+.	O
+
+Failure	O
+to	O
+obey	O
+the	O
+rules	O
+may	O
+result	O
+in	O
+suspension	O
+or	O
+revocation	O
+of	O
+the	O
+“	O
+hard	O
+pass	O
+,	O
+”	O
+the	O
+document	O
+allowing	O
+major	O
+networks	O
+regular	O
+access	O
+to	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+,	O
+RT	O
+reports	O
+.	O
+
+BREAKING	O
+NEWS	O
+:	O
+White	O
+House	O
+agrees	O
+to	O
+fully	O
+reinstate	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+of	O
+CNN	O
+'s	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+and	O
+has	O
+set	O
+the	O
+following	O
+rules	O
+.	O
+
+pic.twitter.com/xAVa9TJW70	O
+—	O
+Michael	O
+Moates	O
+(	O
+@freedom_moates	O
+)	O
+November	O
+19	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+
+Should	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+his	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+back	O
+?	O
+
+Should	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+his	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+back	O
+?	O
+
+Should	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+his	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+back	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+Yes	O
+,	O
+he	O
+should	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+it	O
+back	O
+.	O
+
+No	O
+,	O
+you	O
+ca	O
+n't	O
+act	O
+like	O
+a	O
+child	O
+and	O
+keep	O
+your	O
+pass	O
+.	O
+
+Maybe	O
+?	O
+
+I	O
+'m	O
+not	O
+sure	O
+if	O
+he	O
+should	O
+have	O
+.	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Name	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Truth	O
+Uncensored	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Should	O
+you	O
+refuse	O
+to	O
+follow	O
+these	O
+rules	O
+in	O
+the	O
+future	O
+,	O
+we	O
+will	O
+take	O
+action	O
+in	O
+accordance	O
+with	O
+the	O
+rules	O
+,	O
+”	O
+wrote	O
+Sanders	O
+and	O
+Shine	O
+.	O
+
+Acosta	O
+’s	O
+pass	O
+was	O
+yanked	O
+following	O
+an	O
+incident	O
+at	O
+President	O
+Donald	O
+Trump	O
+’s	O
+November	O
+7	O
+press	O
+conference	O
+,	O
+where	O
+the	O
+CNN	O
+correspondent	O
+argued	O
+with	O
+Trump	O
+instead	O
+of	O
+asking	O
+questions	O
+(	O
+not	O
+for	O
+the	O
+first	O
+time	O
+)	O
+and	O
+physically	O
+prevented	O
+a	O
+White	O
+House	O
+intern	O
+from	O
+taking	O
+the	O
+microphone	O
+away	O
+from	O
+him	O
+.	O
+
+CNN	O
+responded	O
+by	O
+suing	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+,	O
+claiming	O
+that	O
+Acosta	O
+’s	O
+due	O
+process	O
+and	O
+free	O
+speech	O
+rights	O
+were	O
+being	O
+infringed	O
+.	O
+
+Last	O
+week	O
+,	O
+a	O
+federal	O
+judge	O
+ordered	O
+the	O
+pass	O
+temporarily	O
+restored	O
+on	O
+due	O
+process	O
+grounds	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+response	O
+to	O
+the	O
+letter	O
+,	O
+CNN	O
+dropped	O
+the	O
+lawsuit	O
+.	O
+
+Mainstream	O
+media	O
+outlets	O
+that	O
+had	O
+joined	O
+CNN	O
+in	O
+suing	O
+Trump	O
+celebrated	O
+Monday	O
+’s	O
+letter	O
+,	O
+framing	O
+it	O
+as	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+“	O
+backing	O
+down	O
+”	O
+in	O
+face	O
+of	O
+the	O
+legal	O
+challenge	O
+while	O
+largely	O
+ignoring	O
+the	O
+implications	O
+of	O
+the	O
+new	O
+rules	O
+:	O
+that	O
+the	B-PROP
+media	I-PROP
+critical	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+Trump	I-PROP
+might	I-PROP
+have	I-PROP
+won	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+battle	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+but	I-PROP
+lost	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+war	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+White	O
+House	O
+backs	O
+down	O
+from	O
+legal	O
+fight	O
+,	O
+restores	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+'s	O
+press	O
+passhttps://t.co/LQoIVgSnCv	O
+—	O
+AprilDRyan	O
+(	O
+@AprilDRyan	O
+)	O
+November	O
+19	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+“	O
+We	O
+have	O
+created	O
+these	O
+rules	O
+with	O
+a	O
+degree	O
+of	O
+regret	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Sanders	O
+and	O
+Shine	O
+wrote	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+But	O
+,	O
+given	O
+the	O
+position	O
+taken	O
+by	O
+CNN	O
+,	O
+we	O
+now	O
+feel	O
+obligated	O
+to	O
+replace	O
+previously	O
+shared	O
+practices	O
+with	O
+explicit	O
+rules	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+This	O
+means	O
+that	O
+Acosta	O
+,	O
+or	O
+any	O
+other	O
+reporter	O
+covering	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+,	O
+can	O
+get	O
+their	O
+pass	O
+suspended	O
+or	O
+revoked	O
+over	O
+specific	O
+conduct	O
+going	O
+forward	O
+,	O
+without	O
+having	O
+a	O
+leg	O
+to	O
+stand	O
+on	O
+in	O
+terms	O
+of	O
+due	O
+process	O
+.	O
+
+That	O
+leaves	O
+the	O
+First	O
+Amendment	O
+grounds	O
+,	O
+effectively	O
+arguing	O
+that	O
+access	O
+to	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+is	O
+a	O
+civil	O
+right	O
+under	O
+the	O
+US	O
+Constitution	O
+,	O
+for	O
+which	O
+there	O
+is	O
+no	O
+precedent	O
+under	O
+US	O
+law	O
+.	O
+
+Stacey	O
+Abrams	O
+to	O
+Sue	O
+Georgia	O
+Over	O
+‘	O
+Gross	B-PROP
+Mismanagement	I-PROP
+’	I-PROP
+of	O
+Elections	O
+
+Stacey	O
+Abrams	O
+quits	O
+race	O
+for	O
+governor	O
+of	O
+Georgia	O
+,	O
+accusing	O
+rival	O
+Republican	O
+Brian	O
+Kemp	O
+of	O
+voter	O
+suppression	O
+.	O
+
+1.2k	O
+SHARES	O
+Facebook	O
+Twitter	O
+
+Georgia	O
+gubernatorial	O
+candidate	O
+Stacey	O
+Abrams	O
+may	O
+have	O
+begrudgingly	O
+recognized	O
+her	O
+rival	O
+’s	O
+victory	O
+,	O
+but	O
+she	O
+is	O
+far	O
+from	O
+done	O
+fighting	O
+for	O
+what	O
+she	O
+believes	O
+was	O
+her	O
+due	O
+.	O
+
+With	O
+a	O
+team	O
+of	O
+three	O
+dozen	O
+lawyers	O
+,	O
+Abrams	O
+has	O
+announced	O
+she	O
+would	O
+file	O
+a	O
+federal	O
+suit	O
+against	O
+Georgia	O
+for	O
+“	O
+gross	B-PROP
+mismanagement	I-PROP
+”	O
+of	O
+the	O
+vote	O
+.	O
+
+Abrams	O
+and	O
+civil	O
+rights	O
+groups	O
+accused	O
+the	O
+winner	O
+,	O
+Republican	O
+Brian	O
+Kemp	O
+of	O
+purging	O
+thousands	O
+from	O
+voting	O
+rolls	O
+in	O
+that	O
+capacity	O
+.	O
+
+Abrams	O
+remained	O
+about	O
+18,000	O
+votes	O
+short	O
+of	O
+a	O
+result	O
+that	O
+would	O
+have	O
+required	O
+a	O
+runoff	O
+between	O
+her	O
+and	O
+Kamp	O
+in	O
+December	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Associated	O
+Press	O
+(	O
+AP	O
+)	O
+reported	O
+her	O
+team	O
+amassed	O
+nearly	O
+three	O
+-	O
+dozen	O
+lawyers	O
+who	O
+will	O
+draft	O
+a	O
+petition	O
+,	O
+along	O
+with	O
+affidavits	O
+from	O
+voters	O
+and	O
+would	O
+-	O
+be	O
+voters	O
+who	O
+argue	O
+that	O
+they	O
+were	O
+allegedly	O
+disenfranchised	O
+during	O
+the	O
+election	O
+.	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+Should	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+his	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+back	O
+?	O
+
+Should	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+his	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+back	O
+?	O
+
+Should	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+his	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+back	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+Yes	O
+,	O
+he	O
+should	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+it	O
+back	O
+.	O
+
+No	O
+,	O
+you	O
+ca	O
+n't	O
+act	O
+like	O
+a	O
+child	O
+and	O
+keep	O
+your	O
+pass	O
+.	O
+
+Maybe	O
+?	O
+
+I	O
+'m	O
+not	O
+sure	O
+if	O
+he	O
+should	O
+have	O
+.	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Email	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Truth	O
+Uncensored	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+In	O
+the	O
+coming	O
+days	O
+,	O
+we	O
+will	O
+be	O
+filing	O
+a	O
+major	O
+federal	O
+lawsuit	O
+against	O
+the	O
+state	O
+of	O
+Georgia	O
+for	O
+the	O
+gross	B-PROP
+mismanagement	I-PROP
+of	O
+this	O
+election	O
+and	O
+to	O
+protect	O
+future	O
+elections	O
+from	O
+unconstitutional	O
+actions	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Abrams	O
+said	O
+,	O
+though	O
+she	O
+gave	O
+no	O
+details	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+the	O
+coming	O
+days	O
+,	O
+we	O
+will	O
+be	O
+filing	O
+a	O
+major	O
+federal	O
+lawsuit	O
+against	O
+the	O
+state	O
+of	O
+Georgia	O
+for	O
+the	O
+gross	B-PROP
+mismanagement	I-PROP
+of	O
+this	O
+election	O
+and	O
+to	O
+protect	O
+future	O
+elections	O
+from	O
+unconstitutional	O
+actions	O
+.	O
+
+#	O
+gapol	O
+—	O
+Stacey	O
+Abrams	O
+(	O
+@staceyabrams	O
+)	O
+November	O
+17	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+In	O
+a	O
+speech	O
+on	O
+Nov.	O
+19	O
+right	O
+at	O
+the	O
+cutoff	O
+for	O
+Georgia	O
+counties	O
+to	O
+certify	O
+election	O
+results	O
+,	O
+Abrams	O
+delivered	O
+a	O
+speech	O
+in	O
+which	O
+she	O
+said	O
+,	O
+“	O
+I	O
+acknowledge	O
+that	O
+former	O
+Secretary	O
+of	O
+State	O
+Brian	O
+Kemp	O
+will	O
+be	O
+certified	O
+as	O
+the	O
+victor	O
+in	O
+the	O
+2018	O
+gubernatorial	O
+election	O
+.	O
+”	O
+However	O
+,	O
+Abrams	O
+said	O
+Kemp	O
+had	O
+relied	O
+on	O
+“	O
+suppression	O
+of	O
+the	O
+people	O
+’s	O
+democratic	O
+right	O
+to	O
+vote	O
+”	O
+that	O
+was	O
+“	O
+deliberate	O
+and	O
+intentional	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Kemp	O
+tried	O
+to	O
+move	O
+past	O
+the	O
+contentious	O
+campaign	O
+even	O
+if	O
+his	O
+opponent	O
+was	O
+n’t	O
+willing	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+The	O
+election	O
+is	O
+over	O
+and	O
+hardworking	B-PROP
+Georgians	I-PROP
+are	O
+ready	O
+to	O
+move	O
+forward	O
+,	O
+”	O
+he	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+We	O
+can	O
+no	O
+longer	O
+dwell	O
+on	O
+the	O
+divisive	B-PROP
+politics	O
+of	O
+the	O
+past	O
+but	O
+must	O
+focus	O
+on	O
+Georgia	O
+’s	O
+bright	B-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+promising	I-PROP
+future	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+The	O
+election	O
+is	O
+over	O
+and	O
+hardworking	B-PROP
+Georgians	I-PROP
+are	O
+ready	O
+to	O
+move	O
+forward	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+can	O
+no	O
+longer	O
+dwell	O
+on	O
+the	O
+divisive	B-PROP
+politics	O
+of	O
+the	O
+past	O
+but	O
+must	O
+focus	O
+on	O
+Georgia	O
+’s	O
+bright	B-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+promising	I-PROP
+future	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+#	O
+gapol	O
+(	O
+1	O
+of	O
+3	O
+)	O
+—	O
+Brian	O
+Kemp	O
+(	O
+@BrianKempGA	O
+)	O
+November	O
+16	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+Breitbart	O
+reports	O
+:	O
+
+Abrams	O
+could	O
+decide	O
+as	O
+early	O
+as	O
+Friday	O
+whether	O
+to	O
+go	O
+to	O
+court	O
+.	O
+
+Under	O
+Georgia	O
+election	O
+law	O
+,	O
+a	O
+losing	O
+candidate	O
+can	O
+challenge	O
+the	O
+result	O
+of	O
+an	O
+election	O
+based	O
+on	O
+“	O
+misconduct	O
+,	O
+fraud	O
+or	O
+irregularities	O
+…	O
+sufficient	O
+to	O
+change	O
+or	O
+place	O
+in	O
+doubt	O
+the	O
+results	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Allegra	O
+Lawrence	O
+-	O
+Hardy	O
+,	O
+Abrams	O
+’	O
+campaign	O
+chair	O
+,	O
+said	O
+that	O
+her	O
+legal	O
+team	O
+is	O
+“	O
+considering	O
+all	O
+options	O
+,	O
+”	O
+which	O
+also	O
+includes	O
+federal	O
+court	O
+remedies	O
+.	O
+
+Some	O
+Democratic	O
+legal	O
+observers	O
+note	O
+Abrams	O
+would	O
+be	O
+dependent	O
+on	O
+statues	O
+that	O
+set	O
+a	O
+high	O
+bar	O
+for	O
+the	O
+court	O
+to	O
+intervene	O
+.	O
+
+Abrams	O
+Republican	O
+challenger	O
+,	O
+Georgia	O
+Secretary	O
+of	O
+State	O
+Brian	O
+Kemp	O
+,	O
+has	O
+held	O
+the	O
+lead	O
+and	O
+is	O
+expected	O
+to	O
+be	O
+declared	O
+the	O
+winner	O
+on	O
+Friday	O
+,	O
+charged	O
+that	O
+Abrams	O
+has	O
+led	O
+a	B-PROP
+“	I-PROP
+publicity	I-PROP
+stunt	I-PROP
+”	O
+and	O
+her	O
+refusal	O
+to	O
+concede	O
+the	O
+election	O
+serves	O
+as	O
+a	O
+“	O
+ridiculous	B-PROP
+temper	I-PROP
+tantrum	I-PROP
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Abrams	O
+faces	O
+a	O
+narrow	O
+path	O
+to	O
+winning	O
+the	O
+Georgia	O
+gubernatorial	O
+election	O
+.	O
+
+Preliminary	O
+election	O
+results	O
+show	O
+Kemp	O
+winning	O
+with	O
+about	O
+50.2	O
+percent	O
+of	O
+the	O
+vote	O
+,	O
+which	O
+puts	O
+him	O
+with	O
+over	O
+18,000	O
+voters	O
+over	O
+the	O
+threshold	O
+required	O
+to	O
+win	O
+by	O
+a	O
+majority	O
+and	O
+avoid	O
+a	O
+December	O
+4	O
+election	O
+runoff	O
+.	O
+
+Lawrence	O
+-	O
+Hardy	O
+told	O
+the	O
+AP	O
+that	O
+Abrams	O
+believes	O
+that	O
+many	O
+of	O
+her	O
+supporters	O
+,	O
+many	O
+of	O
+them	O
+minority	O
+and	O
+low	O
+-	O
+income	O
+voters	O
+who	O
+do	O
+not	O
+regularly	O
+vote	O
+,	O
+went	O
+to	O
+the	O
+polls	O
+and	O
+ran	O
+into	O
+electoral	O
+barriers	O
+,	O
+although	O
+she	O
+did	O
+not	O
+say	O
+what	O
+barriers	O
+they	O
+were	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+These	O
+stories	O
+to	O
+me	O
+are	O
+such	O
+that	O
+they	O
+have	O
+to	O
+be	O
+addressed	O
+,	O
+”	O
+said	O
+Lawrence	O
+-	O
+Hardy	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+It	B-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+just	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+much	I-PROP
+bigger	I-PROP
+responsibility	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+I	O
+feel	O
+like	O
+our	O
+mandate	O
+has	O
+blossomed	O
+.	O
+
+…	O
+Maybe	O
+this	O
+is	O
+our	O
+moment	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+CNN	O
+Sues	O
+Trump	O
+Demanding	O
+He	O
+Restore	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+’s	O
+White	O
+House	O
+Credential	O
+
+CNN	O
+sues	O
+President	O
+Trump	O
+and	O
+top	O
+White	O
+House	O
+aides	O
+for	O
+barring	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+.	O
+
+557	O
+SHARES	O
+Facebook	O
+Twitter	O
+
+CNN	O
+has	O
+filed	O
+a	O
+lawsuit	O
+against	O
+the	O
+Trump	O
+administration	O
+over	O
+the	O
+revocation	O
+of	O
+press	O
+credentials	O
+from	O
+its	O
+reporter	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+demanding	O
+they	O
+be	O
+restored	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+suit	O
+alleges	O
+the	O
+ban	O
+violated	O
+both	O
+First	O
+and	O
+Fifth	O
+Amendment	O
+rights	O
+of	O
+the	O
+network	O
+and	O
+reporter	O
+.	O
+
+Last	O
+Wednesday	O
+White	O
+House	O
+press	O
+secretary	O
+Sarah	O
+Sanders	O
+made	O
+the	O
+announcement	O
+that	O
+Acosta	O
+’s	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+had	O
+been	O
+suspended	O
+as	O
+a	O
+result	O
+of	O
+an	O
+altercation	B-PROP
+during	O
+a	O
+press	O
+conference	O
+when	O
+Acosta	O
+refused	O
+to	O
+give	O
+up	O
+the	O
+microphone	O
+after	O
+several	O
+requests	O
+by	O
+President	O
+Trump	O
+to	O
+hand	O
+it	O
+over	O
+.	O
+
+Not	O
+only	O
+did	O
+Acosta	O
+refuse	O
+to	O
+hand	O
+over	O
+the	O
+microphone	O
+,	O
+but	O
+he	O
+pushed	O
+the	O
+female	O
+interns	O
+hand	O
+away	O
+when	O
+she	O
+tried	O
+to	O
+follow	O
+the	O
+presidents	O
+request	O
+to	O
+take	O
+the	O
+microphone	O
+away	O
+from	O
+Acosta	O
+,	O
+who	O
+has	O
+disputed	O
+the	O
+accusation	O
+claiming	O
+he	O
+never	O
+put	O
+his	O
+hands	O
+on	O
+the	O
+young	O
+woman	O
+.	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+Should	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+his	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+back	O
+?	O
+
+Should	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+his	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+back	O
+?	O
+
+Should	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+his	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+back	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+Yes	O
+,	O
+he	O
+should	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+it	O
+back	O
+.	O
+
+No	O
+,	O
+you	O
+ca	O
+n't	O
+act	O
+like	O
+a	O
+child	O
+and	O
+keep	O
+your	O
+pass	O
+.	O
+
+Maybe	O
+?	O
+
+I	O
+'m	O
+not	O
+sure	O
+if	O
+he	O
+should	O
+have	O
+.	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Phone	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Truth	O
+Uncensored	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+Watching	O
+the	O
+full	O
+exchange	O
+it	O
+is	O
+obvious	O
+that	O
+Trump	O
+was	O
+making	O
+a	O
+sincere	O
+effort	O
+to	O
+answer	O
+Acosta	O
+’s	O
+questions	O
+,	O
+the	O
+president	O
+actually	O
+took	O
+the	O
+time	O
+to	O
+answer	O
+three	O
+of	O
+his	O
+questions	O
+before	O
+losing	O
+his	O
+patients	O
+with	O
+an	O
+argumentative	O
+Acosta	O
+who	O
+refused	O
+to	O
+hand	O
+the	O
+mic	O
+over	O
+to	O
+the	O
+female	O
+intern	O
+forcefully	O
+pushing	O
+her	O
+arm	O
+away	O
+.	O
+
+Acosta	O
+can	O
+deny	O
+how	O
+the	O
+altercation	B-PROP
+took	O
+place	O
+,	O
+but	O
+the	O
+video	O
+shows	O
+the	O
+facts	O
+,	O
+which	O
+are	O
+that	O
+Acosta	O
+was	O
+out	O
+of	O
+line	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+lawsuit	O
+was	O
+announced	O
+by	O
+CNN	O
+on	O
+Tuesday	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+network	O
+is	O
+also	O
+asking	O
+the	O
+court	O
+for	O
+an	O
+“	O
+immediate	O
+restraining	O
+order	O
+requiring	O
+the	O
+pass	O
+be	O
+returned	O
+to	O
+Jim	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Both	O
+CNN	O
+and	O
+Acosta	O
+are	O
+plaintiffs	O
+in	O
+the	O
+lawsuit	O
+,	O
+and	O
+there	O
+are	O
+six	O
+defendants	O
+:	O
+Donald	O
+Trump	O
+himself	O
+,	O
+White	O
+House	O
+Press	O
+Secretary	O
+Sarah	O
+Sanders	O
+,	O
+Chief	O
+of	O
+Staff	O
+John	O
+Kelly	O
+,	O
+his	O
+aide	O
+for	O
+communication	O
+Bill	O
+Shine	O
+,	O
+Secret	O
+Service	O
+Director	O
+Joseph	O
+Clancy	O
+,	O
+and	O
+the	O
+unidentified	O
+Secret	O
+Service	O
+officer	O
+who	O
+took	O
+the	O
+pass	O
+from	O
+Acosta	O
+.	O
+
+Fox	O
+News	O
+reports	O
+:	O
+
+“	O
+The	O
+wrongful	O
+revocation	O
+of	O
+these	O
+credentials	O
+violates	O
+CNN	O
+and	O
+Acosta	O
+’s	O
+First	O
+Amendment	O
+rights	O
+of	O
+freedom	O
+of	O
+the	O
+press	O
+,	O
+and	O
+their	O
+Fifth	O
+Amendment	O
+rights	O
+to	O
+due	O
+process	O
+,	O
+”	O
+CNN	O
+said	O
+in	O
+a	O
+statement	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+We	O
+have	O
+asked	O
+the	O
+court	O
+for	O
+an	O
+immediate	O
+restraining	O
+order	O
+requiring	O
+the	O
+pass	O
+to	O
+be	O
+returned	O
+to	O
+Jim	O
+,	O
+and	O
+will	O
+seek	O
+permanent	O
+relief	O
+as	O
+part	O
+of	O
+this	O
+process	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+CNN	O
+added	O
+that	O
+“	O
+the	O
+suit	O
+is	O
+specific	O
+to	O
+CNN	O
+and	O
+Acosta	O
+,	O
+”	O
+but	O
+said	O
+it	O
+could	O
+happen	O
+to	O
+anyone	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+If	O
+left	O
+unchallenged	O
+,	O
+the	O
+actions	O
+of	O
+the	O
+White	O
+house	O
+would	O
+create	O
+a	B-PROP
+dangerous	I-PROP
+chilling	I-PROP
+effect	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+any	I-PROP
+journalist	I-PROP
+who	I-PROP
+covers	I-PROP
+our	B-PROP
+elected	I-PROP
+officials	I-PROP
+,	O
+”	O
+CNN	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+morning	O
+,	O
+CNN	O
+filed	O
+a	O
+lawsuit	O
+against	O
+@realDonaldTrump	O
+and	O
+top	O
+aides	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+White	O
+House	O
+has	O
+violated	O
+CNN	O
+and	O
+@Acosta	O
+'s	O
+First	O
+Amendment	O
+rights	O
+of	O
+freedom	O
+of	O
+the	O
+press	O
+and	O
+Fifth	O
+Amendment	O
+rights	O
+to	O
+due	O
+process	O
+.	O
+
+Complaint	O
+:	O
+https://t.co/43oX6L8xA7	O
+pic.twitter.com/RvJ0Cgh6oi	O
+—	O
+CNN	O
+Communications	O
+(	O
+@CNNPR	O
+)	O
+November	O
+13	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+The	O
+White	O
+House	O
+did	O
+not	O
+immediately	O
+respond	O
+to	O
+a	O
+request	O
+for	O
+comment	O
+.	O
+
+Last	O
+week	O
+,	O
+Acosta	O
+’s	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+to	O
+access	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+was	O
+suspended	O
+“	O
+until	O
+further	O
+notice	O
+”	O
+after	O
+he	O
+engaged	O
+in	O
+the	O
+contentious	B-PROP
+back	O
+-	O
+and	O
+-	O
+forth	O
+over	O
+the	O
+migrant	O
+caravan	O
+working	O
+its	O
+way	O
+up	O
+through	O
+Mexico	O
+.	O
+
+Trump	O
+characterizes	O
+the	O
+caravan	O
+as	O
+“	O
+an	O
+invasion	B-PROP
+,	O
+”	O
+a	O
+term	O
+to	O
+which	O
+Acosta	O
+objected	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Honestly	O
+,	O
+I	O
+think	O
+you	O
+should	O
+let	O
+me	O
+run	O
+the	O
+country	O
+and	O
+you	O
+run	O
+CNN	O
+,	O
+”	O
+the	O
+president	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+reporter	O
+tried	O
+to	O
+ask	O
+him	O
+another	O
+question	O
+before	O
+a	O
+female	O
+White	O
+House	O
+aide	O
+walked	O
+over	O
+to	O
+him	O
+.	O
+
+Trump	O
+then	O
+told	O
+him	O
+,	O
+“	O
+That	B-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+enough	I-PROP
+!	O
+”	O
+
+Acosta	O
+continued	O
+to	O
+try	O
+to	O
+talk	O
+as	O
+the	O
+intern	O
+was	O
+seen	O
+trying	O
+to	O
+take	O
+the	O
+microphone	O
+from	O
+his	O
+hand	O
+.	O
+
+She	O
+grabbed	O
+the	O
+microphone	O
+but	O
+Acosta	O
+would	O
+n’t	O
+give	O
+it	O
+up	O
+and	O
+there	O
+was	O
+brief	O
+contact	O
+between	O
+the	O
+two	O
+.	O
+
+White	O
+House	O
+Press	O
+Secretary	O
+Sarah	O
+Sanders	O
+said	O
+the	O
+suspension	O
+of	O
+his	O
+press	O
+credentials	O
+stemmed	O
+from	O
+his	O
+“	O
+placing	O
+his	O
+hands	O
+on	O
+a	O
+young	O
+woman	O
+just	O
+trying	O
+to	O
+do	O
+her	O
+job	O
+as	O
+a	O
+White	O
+House	O
+intern	O
+.	O
+”	O
+She	O
+called	O
+the	O
+behavior	O
+“	O
+absolutely	B-PROP
+unacceptable	I-PROP
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Several	O
+news	O
+outlets	O
+accused	O
+Sanders	O
+of	O
+using	O
+a	O
+“	O
+doctored	B-PROP
+”	I-PROP
+video	I-PROP
+as	O
+evidence	O
+,	O
+but	O
+the	O
+press	O
+secretary	O
+did	O
+n’t	O
+back	O
+down	O
+from	O
+her	O
+decision	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+We	O
+stand	O
+by	O
+our	O
+decision	O
+to	O
+revoke	O
+this	O
+individual	O
+’s	O
+hard	O
+pass	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+will	O
+not	O
+tolerate	O
+the	O
+inappropriate	O
+behavior	O
+clearly	O
+documented	O
+in	O
+this	O
+video	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Sanders	O
+tweeted	O
+to	O
+accompany	O
+the	O
+allegedly	O
+doctored	O
+video	O
+.	O
+
+White	O
+House	O
+Counselor	O
+Kellyanne	O
+Conway	O
+has	O
+since	O
+said	O
+the	O
+video	O
+was	O
+simply	O
+“	O
+sped	O
+up	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+An	O
+attorney	O
+for	O
+CNN	O
+and	O
+Acosta	O
+followed	O
+up	O
+with	O
+a	O
+separate	O
+statement	O
+,	O
+saying	O
+the	O
+law	O
+is	O
+“	O
+clear	O
+”	O
+that	O
+the	O
+Trump	O
+administration	O
+violated	O
+the	O
+First	O
+Amendment	O
+and	O
+Due	O
+process	O
+Clause	O
+.	O
+
+Report	O
+:	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+and	O
+CNN	O
+File	O
+Lawsuit	O
+Against	O
+Trump	O
+Administration	O
+
+CNN	O
+is	O
+taking	O
+the	O
+ongoing	O
+feud	B-PROP
+between	O
+President	O
+Trump	O
+and	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+to	O
+court	O
+.	O
+
+Appearing	O
+on	O
+CNN	O
+’s	O
+“	O
+Reliable	O
+Sources	O
+”	O
+this	O
+Sunday	O
+,	O
+ABC	O
+’s	O
+former	O
+White	O
+House	O
+correspondent	O
+Sam	O
+Donaldson	O
+made	O
+the	O
+claim	O
+that	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+and	O
+CNN	O
+had	O
+already	O
+filed	O
+a	O
+lawsuit	O
+against	O
+the	O
+Trump	O
+administration	O
+over	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+’s	O
+decision	O
+to	O
+revoke	O
+the	O
+reporter	O
+’s	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+.	O
+
+It	O
+appears	O
+that	O
+CNN	O
+is	O
+setting	O
+the	O
+wheels	O
+in	O
+motion	O
+for	O
+a	O
+lawsuit	O
+against	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+for	O
+removing	O
+the	O
+press	O
+credentials	O
+of	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+following	O
+a	O
+tense	O
+incident	O
+Wednesday	O
+during	O
+a	O
+news	O
+conference	O
+at	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+I	O
+hope	O
+I	O
+’m	O
+not	O
+mistaken	O
+,	O
+but	O
+it	O
+’s	O
+my	O
+understanding	O
+that	O
+CNN	O
+and	O
+Acosta	O
+have	O
+sued	O
+,	O
+that	O
+there	O
+will	O
+be	O
+a	O
+court	O
+hearing	O
+on	O
+Tuesday	O
+on	O
+this	O
+very	O
+matter	O
+that	O
+we	O
+’ve	O
+been	O
+discussing	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Donaldson	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+
+Should	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+his	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+back	O
+?	O
+
+Should	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+his	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+back	O
+?	O
+
+Should	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+his	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+back	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+Yes	O
+,	O
+he	O
+should	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+it	O
+back	O
+.	O
+
+No	O
+,	O
+you	O
+ca	O
+n't	O
+act	O
+like	O
+a	O
+child	O
+and	O
+keep	O
+your	O
+pass	O
+.	O
+
+Maybe	O
+?	O
+
+I	O
+'m	O
+not	O
+sure	O
+if	O
+he	O
+should	O
+have	O
+.	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Email	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Truth	O
+Uncensored	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+Donaldson	O
+claims	O
+that	O
+he	O
+has	O
+already	O
+been	O
+asked	O
+to	O
+prepare	O
+an	O
+affidavit	O
+to	O
+be	O
+submitted	O
+to	O
+court	O
+,	O
+likely	O
+due	O
+to	O
+Donaldson	O
+’s	O
+own	O
+reputation	O
+for	O
+confrontation	O
+with	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+,	O
+including	O
+trading	O
+personal	O
+insults	O
+with	O
+President	O
+George	O
+Bush	O
+in	O
+2006	O
+,	O
+RT	O
+reports	O
+.	O
+
+Donaldson	O
+also	O
+said	O
+that	O
+he	O
+had	O
+sent	O
+Acosta	O
+an	O
+email	O
+which	O
+encouraged	O
+him	O
+to	O
+‘	O
+Keep	O
+it	O
+up	O
+”	O
+,	O
+and	O
+not	O
+to	O
+worry	O
+about	O
+the	O
+“	O
+vicious	B-PROP
+attacks	I-PROP
+”	O
+and	O
+“	O
+threats	O
+”	O
+.	O
+
+CNN	O
+released	O
+a	O
+statement	O
+saying	O
+no	O
+decision	O
+has	O
+been	O
+made	O
+as	O
+of	O
+yet	O
+on	O
+the	O
+lawsuit	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+network	O
+has	O
+reached	O
+out	O
+to	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+on	O
+the	O
+issue	O
+but	O
+has	O
+“	O
+gotten	O
+no	O
+response	O
+”	O
+.	O
+
+Sunday	O
+’s	O
+“	O
+Reliable	O
+Sources	O
+”	O
+also	O
+featured	O
+constitutional	O
+lawyer	O
+Floyd	O
+Mayweather	O
+who	O
+emphasized	O
+that	O
+CNN	O
+would	O
+have	O
+a	O
+“	O
+really	O
+strong	O
+lawsuit	O
+”	O
+if	O
+they	O
+chose	O
+to	O
+proceed	O
+.	O
+
+Last	O
+Wednesday	O
+White	O
+House	O
+press	O
+secretary	O
+Sarah	O
+Sanders	O
+made	O
+the	O
+announcement	O
+that	O
+Acosta	O
+’s	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+had	O
+been	O
+suspended	O
+as	O
+a	O
+result	O
+of	O
+a	O
+tussle	O
+with	O
+a	O
+White	O
+House	O
+intern	O
+over	O
+a	O
+microphone	O
+following	O
+his	O
+sharp	O
+back	O
+-	O
+and	O
+-	O
+forth	O
+with	O
+Trump	O
+during	O
+the	O
+President	O
+’s	O
+post	O
+-	O
+midterm	O
+Q&A.	O
+
+Acosta	O
+has	O
+disputed	O
+the	O
+accusation	O
+claiming	O
+he	O
+never	O
+put	O
+his	O
+hands	O
+on	O
+the	O
+young	O
+woman	O
+.	O
+
+Watching	O
+the	O
+full	O
+exchange	O
+it	O
+is	O
+obvious	O
+that	O
+President	O
+Trump	O
+was	O
+making	O
+a	O
+sincere	O
+effort	O
+to	O
+answer	O
+Acosta	O
+’s	O
+questions	O
+,	O
+the	O
+president	O
+actually	O
+took	O
+the	O
+time	O
+to	O
+answer	O
+three	O
+of	O
+his	O
+questions	O
+before	O
+rightfully	O
+losing	O
+his	O
+patients	O
+when	O
+Acosta	O
+refused	O
+to	O
+hand	O
+the	O
+mic	O
+over	O
+.	O
+
+Not	O
+only	O
+that	O
+,	O
+he	O
+used	O
+his	O
+hand	O
+to	O
+forcefully	O
+push	O
+the	O
+female	O
+interns	O
+arm	O
+away	O
+from	O
+the	O
+mic	O
+.	O
+
+Acosta	O
+should	O
+have	O
+been	O
+escorted	O
+from	O
+the	O
+room	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+deserved	O
+to	O
+have	O
+his	O
+credentials	O
+revoked	O
+.	O
+
+White	O
+House	O
+Outlines	O
+Code	O
+Of	O
+Conduct	O
+For	O
+White	O
+House	O
+Press	O
+-	O
+If	O
+Those	O
+Do	O
+n't	O
+Work	O
+,	O
+They	O
+'ll	O
+Be	O
+Forced	O
+To	O
+Write	O
+More	O
+
+For	O
+any	O
+constitutionalist	O
+,	O
+the	O
+ruling	O
+by	O
+Trump	B-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+appointed	I-PROP
+Judge	I-PROP
+Timothy	I-PROP
+J.	O
+Kelly	O
+was	O
+nothing	O
+but	O
+surreal	O
+,	O
+and	O
+honestly	O
+,	O
+he	B-PROP
+should	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+impeached	I-PROP
+over	I-PROP
+his	I-PROP
+frivolous	I-PROP
+ruling	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+demanded	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+reinstate	O
+CNN	O
+reporter	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+'s	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+.	O
+
+However	O
+,	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+has	O
+decided	O
+to	O
+comply	O
+,	O
+which	O
+I	O
+wonder	O
+just	B-PROP
+how	I-PROP
+dangerous	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+precedent	I-PROP
+this	I-PROP
+sets	I-PROP
+,	O
+and	O
+as	O
+a	O
+result	O
+,	O
+White	O
+House	O
+Press	O
+Secretary	O
+Sarah	O
+Sanders	O
+has	O
+issued	O
+a	O
+code	O
+of	O
+conduct	O
+for	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+press	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+have	O
+created	O
+these	O
+rules	O
+with	O
+a	O
+degree	O
+of	O
+regret	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Sanders	O
+said	O
+in	O
+a	O
+statement	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+fact	O
+that	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+submitted	O
+to	O
+such	O
+a	O
+ridiculous	B-PROP
+demand	O
+when	O
+it	O
+is	O
+simple	O
+human	O
+decency	O
+to	O
+conduct	O
+one	O
+'s	O
+self	O
+in	O
+a	O
+proper	O
+manner	O
+,	O
+unlike	O
+how	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+treated	O
+both	O
+Sarah	O
+Sanders	O
+,	O
+President	O
+Donald	O
+Trump	O
+and	O
+a	O
+White	O
+House	O
+aide	O
+,	O
+is	O
+a	B-PROP
+testimony	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+how	I-PROP
+little	I-PROP
+those	I-PROP
+who	I-PROP
+represent	I-PROP
+us	I-PROP
+know	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+our	I-PROP
+Constitution	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+
+Should	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+his	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+back	O
+?	O
+
+Should	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+his	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+back	O
+?	O
+
+Should	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+his	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+back	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+Yes	O
+,	O
+he	O
+should	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+it	O
+back	O
+.	O
+
+No	O
+,	O
+you	O
+ca	O
+n't	O
+act	O
+like	O
+a	O
+child	O
+and	O
+keep	O
+your	O
+pass	O
+.	O
+
+Maybe	O
+?	O
+
+I	O
+'m	O
+not	O
+sure	O
+if	O
+he	O
+should	O
+have	O
+.	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Email	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Freedom	O
+Outpost	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+We	O
+would	O
+have	O
+greatly	O
+preferred	O
+to	O
+continue	O
+hosting	O
+White	O
+House	O
+press	O
+conferences	O
+in	O
+reliance	O
+on	O
+a	O
+set	O
+of	O
+understood	O
+professional	O
+norms	O
+,	O
+and	O
+we	O
+believe	O
+the	O
+overwhelming	O
+majority	O
+of	O
+journalists	O
+covering	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+share	O
+that	O
+preference	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Sanders	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+But	O
+,	O
+given	O
+the	O
+position	O
+taken	O
+by	O
+CNN	O
+,	O
+we	O
+now	O
+feel	O
+obligated	O
+to	O
+replace	O
+previously	O
+shared	O
+practices	O
+with	O
+explicit	O
+rules	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Oh	B-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+but	I-PROP
+there	I-PROP
+'s	I-PROP
+more	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+If	B-PROP
+journalists	I-PROP
+ca	I-PROP
+n't	I-PROP
+conduct	I-PROP
+themselves	I-PROP
+according	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+these	I-PROP
+rules	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+then	I-PROP
+there	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+no	I-PROP
+other	I-PROP
+option	I-PROP
+but	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+....	I-PROP
+write	I-PROP
+more	I-PROP
+explicit	I-PROP
+rules	I-PROP
+!	O
+
+Seriously	B-PROP
+!	O
+
+“	O
+At	O
+this	O
+time	O
+,	O
+however	O
+,	O
+we	O
+have	O
+decided	O
+not	O
+to	O
+frame	O
+such	O
+rules	O
+in	O
+the	O
+hope	O
+that	O
+professional	O
+journalistic	O
+norms	O
+will	O
+suffice	O
+to	O
+regulate	O
+conduct	O
+in	O
+those	O
+places	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Sanders	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+If	O
+unprofessional	O
+behavior	O
+occurs	O
+in	O
+those	O
+settings	O
+,	O
+or	O
+if	O
+a	O
+court	O
+should	O
+decide	O
+that	O
+explicit	O
+rules	O
+are	O
+required	O
+to	O
+regulate	O
+conduct	O
+there	O
+,	O
+we	O
+will	O
+be	O
+forced	O
+to	O
+reconsider	O
+this	O
+decision	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+The	B-PROP
+White	I-PROP
+House	I-PROP
+should	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+telling	I-PROP
+Judge	I-PROP
+Kelly	I-PROP
+where	I-PROP
+he	I-PROP
+can	I-PROP
+take	I-PROP
+his	I-PROP
+ruling	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+but	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+trying	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+look	I-PROP
+like	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+on	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+high	I-PROP
+ground	I-PROP
+while	I-PROP
+submitting	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+unconstitutional	I-PROP
+rulings	I-PROP
+from	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+federal	I-PROP
+judge	I-PROP
+who	I-PROP
+should	I-PROP
+know	I-PROP
+better	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+However	O
+,	O
+here	O
+are	O
+the	O
+new	O
+rules	O
+released	O
+by	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+Press	O
+Office	O
+.	O
+
+(	O
+1	O
+)	O
+A	O
+journalist	O
+called	O
+upon	O
+to	O
+ask	O
+a	O
+question	O
+will	O
+ask	O
+a	O
+single	O
+question	O
+and	O
+then	O
+will	O
+yield	O
+the	O
+floor	O
+to	O
+other	O
+journalists	O
+;	O
+(	O
+2	O
+)	O
+At	O
+the	O
+discretion	O
+of	O
+the	O
+President	O
+or	O
+other	O
+White	O
+House	O
+official	O
+taking	O
+questions	O
+,	O
+a	O
+follow	O
+-	O
+up	O
+question	O
+or	O
+questions	O
+may	O
+be	O
+permitted	O
+;	O
+and	O
+where	O
+a	O
+follow	O
+up	O
+has	O
+been	O
+allowed	O
+and	O
+asked	O
+,	O
+the	O
+questioner	O
+will	O
+then	O
+yield	O
+the	O
+floor	O
+;	O
+(	O
+3	O
+)	O
+“	O
+Yielding	O
+the	O
+floor	O
+”	O
+includes	O
+,	O
+when	O
+applicable	O
+,	O
+physically	O
+surrendering	O
+the	O
+microphone	O
+to	O
+White	O
+House	O
+staff	O
+for	O
+use	O
+by	O
+the	O
+next	O
+questioner	O
+;	O
+(	O
+4	O
+)	O
+Failure	O
+to	O
+abide	O
+by	O
+any	O
+of	O
+rules	O
+(	O
+1)-(3	O
+)	O
+may	O
+result	O
+in	O
+suspension	O
+or	O
+revocation	O
+of	O
+the	O
+journalist	O
+’s	O
+hard	O
+pass	O
+.	O
+
+I	O
+can	O
+see	O
+this	O
+going	O
+way	O
+downhill	O
+.	O
+
+If	O
+you	O
+want	O
+to	O
+deal	O
+with	O
+people	O
+like	O
+Acosta	O
+,	O
+at	O
+the	O
+moment	O
+they	O
+begin	O
+to	O
+show	O
+who	O
+and	O
+what	O
+they	O
+really	O
+are	O
+,	O
+stop	O
+calling	O
+on	O
+them	O
+for	O
+questions	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+is	O
+my	O
+advice	O
+to	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+.	O
+
+Do	O
+n't	O
+call	O
+on	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+another	O
+time	O
+for	O
+as	O
+long	O
+as	O
+he	O
+remains	O
+in	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+Press	O
+.	O
+
+Make	B-PROP
+him	I-PROP
+regret	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+entire	I-PROP
+time	I-PROP
+he	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+there	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Sore	B-PROP
+Loser	I-PROP
+:	O
+Stacey	O
+Abrams	O
+Ends	O
+Challenges	O
+In	O
+Georgia	O
+Gubernatorial	O
+Race	O
+-	O
+Wo	O
+n't	O
+Concede	O
+-	O
+Set	O
+To	O
+File	O
+Lawsuit	O
+
+Defeated	O
+Georgia	O
+gubernatorial	O
+candidate	O
+Stacey	O
+Abrams	O
+finally	O
+ended	O
+her	O
+challenges	O
+on	O
+Friday	O
+and	O
+ended	O
+her	O
+challenges	O
+against	O
+Republican	O
+opponent	O
+Brian	O
+Kemp	O
+.	O
+
+However	O
+,	O
+in	O
+the	O
+same	O
+breath	O
+that	O
+she	O
+ended	O
+the	O
+challenges	O
+,	O
+she	O
+also	O
+declared	O
+she	O
+would	O
+be	O
+filing	O
+a	O
+federal	O
+lawsuit	O
+over	O
+what	O
+she	O
+called	O
+"	O
+gross	B-PROP
+mismanagement	I-PROP
+"	O
+of	O
+elections	O
+.	O
+
+If	O
+you	O
+ask	O
+me	O
+,	O
+all	B-PROP
+she	I-PROP
+'s	I-PROP
+looking	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+here	I-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+only	I-PROP
+hurt	I-PROP
+herself	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+her	I-PROP
+own	I-PROP
+party	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+This	B-PROP
+woman	I-PROP
+would	I-PROP
+n't	I-PROP
+even	I-PROP
+concede	I-PROP
+!	O
+
+Talk	O
+about	O
+a	B-PROP
+poor	I-PROP
+sport	I-PROP
+,	O
+but	O
+Democrats	O
+are	O
+often	O
+like	O
+that	O
+in	O
+these	O
+races	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+Atlanta	O
+Journal	O
+-	O
+Constitution	O
+reported	O
+:	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+Should	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+his	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+back	O
+?	O
+
+Should	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+his	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+back	O
+?	O
+
+Should	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+his	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+back	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+Yes	O
+,	O
+he	O
+should	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+it	O
+back	O
+.	O
+
+No	O
+,	O
+you	O
+ca	O
+n't	O
+act	O
+like	O
+a	O
+child	O
+and	O
+keep	O
+your	O
+pass	O
+.	O
+
+Maybe	O
+?	O
+
+I	O
+'m	O
+not	O
+sure	O
+if	O
+he	O
+should	O
+have	O
+.	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Comments	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Freedom	O
+Outpost	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+Stacey	O
+Abrams	O
+ended	O
+her	O
+run	O
+for	O
+Georgia	O
+governor	O
+on	O
+Friday	O
+,	O
+but	O
+the	O
+Democrat	B-PROP
+said	O
+she	O
+would	O
+not	O
+concede	O
+the	O
+contest	O
+to	O
+Republican	O
+Brian	O
+Kemp	O
+and	O
+planned	O
+to	O
+launch	O
+a	O
+voting	O
+rights	O
+group	O
+to	O
+file	O
+“	O
+major	O
+”	O
+litigation	O
+challenging	O
+election	O
+policies	O
+.	O
+
+As	O
+state	O
+officials	O
+prepare	O
+to	O
+certify	O
+the	O
+vote	O
+,	O
+Abrams	O
+acknowledged	O
+the	O
+law	O
+“	O
+allows	O
+no	O
+further	O
+viable	O
+remedy	O
+”	O
+to	O
+extend	O
+her	O
+quest	O
+to	O
+be	O
+the	O
+nation	O
+’s	O
+first	O
+black	O
+female	O
+governor	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+she	O
+laced	O
+her	O
+speech	O
+with	O
+biting	B-PROP
+criticism	I-PROP
+of	O
+Kemp	O
+,	O
+who	O
+she	O
+accused	O
+of	O
+leveraging	B-PROP
+his	I-PROP
+role	I-PROP
+as	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+state	I-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+top	I-PROP
+elections	I-PROP
+official	I-PROP
+to	O
+suppress	O
+voters	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+I	O
+will	O
+not	O
+concede	O
+,	O
+”	O
+she	O
+added	O
+,	O
+“	O
+because	O
+the	B-PROP
+erosion	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+our	I-PROP
+democracy	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+not	I-PROP
+right	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+”	O
+
+You	O
+mean	O
+like	O
+having	O
+a	O
+sister	O
+waiting	O
+in	O
+the	O
+wings	O
+of	O
+any	O
+campaign	O
+lawsuits	O
+,	O
+Ms.	O
+Abrams	O
+?	O
+
+What	O
+about	O
+invalid	O
+provisional	O
+ballots	O
+getting	O
+mixed	O
+in	O
+with	O
+valid	O
+ones	O
+?	O
+
+Maybe	O
+a	O
+little	O
+electronic	O
+voter	O
+manipulation	O
+,	O
+Ms.	O
+Abrams	O
+?	O
+
+How	O
+about	O
+non	O
+-	O
+citizens	O
+and	O
+illegal	O
+aliens	O
+voting	O
+,	O
+Ms.	O
+Abrams	O
+?	O
+
+Are	B-PROP
+these	I-PROP
+evidence	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+erosion	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+democratic	I-PROP
+process	I-PROP
+?	I-PROP
+
+Sure	O
+they	O
+are	O
+and	O
+they	O
+appear	O
+to	O
+all	O
+be	O
+coming	O
+from	O
+the	O
+party	O
+that	O
+Stacey	O
+Abrams	O
+represents	O
+,	O
+but	O
+she	O
+'s	O
+not	O
+going	O
+to	O
+talk	O
+about	O
+that	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+she	O
+was	O
+n't	O
+going	O
+to	O
+concede	O
+.	O
+
+Nope	O
+,	O
+that	O
+arrogant	B-PROP
+wanna	I-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+first	I-PROP
+female	I-PROP
+governor	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+Georgia	I-PROP
+simply	O
+would	O
+not	O
+bow	O
+out	O
+gracefully	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+To	B-PROP
+watch	I-PROP
+an	I-PROP
+elected	I-PROP
+official	I-PROP
+who	I-PROP
+claims	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+represent	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+this	I-PROP
+state	I-PROP
+baldly	I-PROP
+pin	I-PROP
+his	I-PROP
+hopes	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+election	I-PROP
+on	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+suppression	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+democratic	I-PROP
+right	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+vote	I-PROP
+has	I-PROP
+been	I-PROP
+truly	I-PROP
+appalling	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+”	I-PROP
+Abrams	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+So	O
+,	O
+let	O
+’s	O
+be	O
+clear	O
+,	O
+"	O
+she	O
+continued	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+This	O
+is	O
+not	O
+a	O
+speech	O
+of	O
+concession	O
+.	O
+
+Because	O
+concession	O
+means	O
+to	O
+acknowledge	O
+an	O
+action	O
+is	O
+right	O
+,	O
+true	O
+or	O
+proper	O
+.	O
+
+As	O
+a	O
+woman	O
+of	O
+conscience	O
+and	O
+faith	O
+,	O
+I	O
+can	O
+not	O
+concede	O
+that	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+my	O
+assessment	O
+is	O
+the	O
+law	O
+currently	O
+allows	O
+no	O
+further	O
+viable	O
+remedy	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+No	O
+,	O
+concession	O
+means	O
+"	O
+a	O
+thing	O
+that	O
+is	O
+granted	O
+,	O
+especially	O
+in	O
+response	O
+to	O
+demands	O
+;	O
+a	O
+thing	O
+conceded	O
+.	O
+"	O
+
+Abrams	O
+was	O
+easily	O
+defeated	O
+in	O
+terms	O
+of	O
+votes	O
+.	O
+
+She	O
+was	O
+the	O
+one	O
+trying	O
+to	O
+"	O
+find	O
+"	O
+and	O
+count	O
+votes	O
+remember	O
+?	O
+
+She	O
+is	O
+the	O
+one	O
+claiming	O
+there	O
+was	O
+cancellation	O
+of	O
+hundreds	O
+of	O
+thousands	O
+of	O
+voter	O
+registrations	O
+.	O
+
+Where	O
+is	O
+her	O
+evidence	O
+?	O
+
+She	O
+has	O
+none	O
+.	O
+
+Stacey	O
+Abrams	O
+is	B-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+sore	I-PROP
+loser	I-PROP
+just	I-PROP
+like	I-PROP
+Hillary	I-PROP
+Clinton	I-PROP
+and	O
+this	O
+little	O
+temper	B-PROP
+tantrum	I-PROP
+she	O
+put	O
+on	O
+display	O
+will	O
+probably	O
+sink	O
+any	O
+chances	O
+she	O
+may	O
+have	O
+had	O
+in	O
+the	O
+future	O
+to	O
+run	O
+again	O
+.	O
+
+Good	B-PROP
+!	O
+
+Thank	O
+God	O
+,	O
+Georgia	O
+did	O
+n't	O
+elect	O
+this	O
+peach	O
+.	O
+
+Obama	O
+Judge	O
+Rules	O
+To	O
+Upend	O
+Georgia	O
+Election	O
+
+Who	B-PROP
+did	I-PROP
+n’t	I-PROP
+see	I-PROP
+this	I-PROP
+coming	I-PROP
+?	I-PROP
+
+The	O
+fix	O
+is	O
+in	O
+.	O
+
+They	B-PROP
+stole	I-PROP
+Arizona	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+One	O
+down	O
+three	O
+to	O
+go	O
+.	O
+
+A	O
+federal	O
+judge	O
+on	O
+Monday	O
+ordered	O
+Georgia	O
+take	O
+steps	O
+to	O
+protect	O
+provisional	O
+ballots	O
+and	O
+to	O
+wait	O
+until	O
+Friday	O
+to	O
+certify	O
+the	O
+results	O
+of	O
+the	O
+midterm	O
+elections	O
+that	O
+include	O
+an	O
+unsettled	O
+race	O
+for	O
+governor	O
+.	O
+
+Lauren	O
+Groh	O
+-	O
+Wargo	O
+,	O
+Abrams	O
+campaign	O
+manager	O
+,	O
+announced	O
+Judge	O
+Amy	O
+Totenberg	O
+’s	O
+decision	O
+late	O
+Monday	O
+.	O
+
+WSBTV.com	O
+reported	O
+that	O
+the	O
+judge	O
+’s	O
+56-page	O
+ruling	O
+could	O
+affect	O
+thousands	O
+of	O
+provisional	O
+ballots	O
+.	O
+
+Groh	O
+-	O
+Wargo	O
+called	O
+the	O
+ruling	O
+“	O
+good	O
+news	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+
+Should	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+his	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+back	O
+?	O
+
+Should	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+his	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+back	O
+?	O
+
+Should	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+his	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+back	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+Yes	O
+,	O
+he	O
+should	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+it	O
+back	O
+.	O
+
+No	O
+,	O
+you	O
+ca	O
+n't	O
+act	O
+like	O
+a	O
+child	O
+and	O
+keep	O
+your	O
+pass	O
+.	O
+
+Maybe	O
+?	O
+
+I	O
+'m	O
+not	O
+sure	O
+if	O
+he	O
+should	O
+have	O
+.	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Email	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Freedom	O
+Outpost	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+Brian	O
+Kemp	O
+,	O
+her	O
+Republican	O
+challenger	O
+,	O
+issued	O
+a	O
+statement	O
+a	O
+day	O
+earlier	O
+calling	O
+for	O
+Abrams	O
+to	O
+concede	O
+.	O
+
+Kemp	O
+has	O
+declared	O
+victory	O
+and	O
+said	O
+it	O
+is	O
+“	O
+mathematically	B-PROP
+impossible	I-PROP
+”	O
+for	O
+her	O
+campaign	O
+to	O
+force	O
+a	O
+runoff	O
+.	O
+
+Abrams	O
+’	O
+campaign	O
+did	O
+not	O
+immediately	O
+respond	O
+to	O
+a	O
+phone	O
+call	O
+from	O
+Fox	O
+News	O
+late	O
+Monday	O
+night	O
+.	O
+
+Abrams	O
+,	O
+44	O
+,	O
+a	B-PROP
+Democrat	I-PROP
+,	O
+has	O
+maintained	O
+that	O
+she	O
+will	O
+not	O
+concede	O
+until	O
+every	O
+vote	O
+has	O
+been	O
+counted	O
+,	O
+and	O
+pointed	O
+to	O
+the	O
+5,000	O
+votes	O
+tallied	O
+over	O
+the	O
+weekend	O
+that	O
+favored	O
+her	O
+.	O
+
+Totenberg	O
+,	O
+who	O
+was	O
+appointed	O
+by	O
+President	O
+Obama	O
+,	O
+ruled	O
+in	O
+connection	O
+to	O
+Common	O
+Cause	O
+’s	O
+lawsuit	O
+filed	O
+on	O
+Nov.	O
+5	O
+.	O
+
+Totenberg	O
+’s	O
+order	O
+does	O
+n’t	O
+change	O
+the	O
+Tuesday	O
+deadline	O
+for	O
+counties	O
+to	O
+certify	O
+their	O
+results	O
+.	O
+
+Common	O
+Cause	O
+,	O
+a	O
+nonpartisan	O
+group	O
+,	O
+claimed	O
+in	O
+the	O
+suit	O
+that	O
+Kemp	O
+,	O
+while	O
+secretary	O
+of	O
+state	O
+,	O
+failed	O
+to	O
+maintain	O
+“	O
+the	O
+security	O
+of	O
+voter	O
+information	O
+despite	O
+known	O
+vulnerabilities	O
+”	O
+leading	O
+up	O
+to	O
+the	O
+midterm	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+suit	O
+blasted	B-PROP
+the	O
+state	O
+’s	O
+“	O
+provisional	O
+ballot	O
+scheme	O
+,	O
+”	O
+that	O
+could	O
+disenfranchise	O
+a	O
+registered	O
+voter	O
+at	O
+the	O
+ballot	O
+box	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+suit	O
+pointed	O
+out	O
+cases	O
+where	O
+voters	O
+were	O
+turned	O
+around	O
+after	O
+computer	O
+glitches	O
+and	O
+cases	O
+where	O
+voters	O
+were	O
+not	O
+offered	O
+provisional	O
+ballots	O
+.	O
+
+One	O
+man	O
+voted	O
+for	O
+decades	O
+and	O
+was	O
+“	O
+disturbed	O
+”	O
+to	O
+learn	O
+his	O
+registration	O
+history	O
+was	O
+erased	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+court	O
+ruled	O
+that	O
+the	O
+secretary	O
+of	O
+state	O
+’s	O
+office	O
+must	O
+establish	O
+a	O
+hotline	O
+and	O
+publicize	O
+it	O
+on	O
+its	O
+website	O
+for	O
+voters	O
+to	O
+see	O
+if	O
+their	O
+provisional	O
+ballots	O
+were	O
+counted	O
+.	O
+
+Totenberg	O
+also	O
+ruled	O
+that	O
+Georgia	O
+must	O
+not	O
+certify	O
+the	O
+election	O
+results	O
+before	O
+Friday	O
+at	O
+5	O
+p.m.	O
+,	O
+which	O
+falls	O
+before	O
+the	O
+Nov.	O
+20	O
+deadline	O
+set	O
+by	O
+state	O
+law	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+I	B-PROP
+am	I-PROP
+fighting	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+make	I-PROP
+sure	I-PROP
+our	I-PROP
+democracy	I-PROP
+works	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+represents	I-PROP
+everyone	I-PROP
+who	I-PROP
+has	I-PROP
+ever	I-PROP
+put	I-PROP
+their	I-PROP
+faith	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+I	O
+am	O
+fighting	O
+for	O
+every	O
+Georgian	O
+who	O
+cast	O
+a	O
+ballot	O
+with	O
+the	O
+promise	O
+that	O
+their	O
+vote	O
+would	O
+count	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Abrams	O
+said	O
+in	O
+a	O
+statement	O
+explaining	O
+her	O
+refusal	O
+to	O
+end	O
+her	O
+bid	O
+to	O
+become	O
+the	O
+first	O
+black	O
+woman	O
+elected	O
+governor	O
+in	O
+American	O
+history	O
+.	O
+
+A	O
+total	O
+of	O
+21,190	O
+provisional	O
+ballots	O
+were	O
+cast	O
+in	O
+the	O
+state	O
+during	O
+the	O
+midterm	O
+,	O
+12,151	O
+were	O
+cast	O
+in	O
+2014	O
+.	O
+
+Four	O
+Democratic	B-PROP
+-	O
+leaning	O
+counties	O
+with	O
+the	O
+largest	O
+number	O
+of	O
+provisional	O
+ballots	O
+—	O
+Cobb	O
+,	O
+DeKalb	O
+,	O
+Fulton	O
+,	O
+and	O
+Gwinnett	O
+–	O
+“	O
+had	O
+not	O
+yet	O
+reported	O
+their	O
+numbers	O
+to	O
+the	O
+secretary	O
+as	O
+of	O
+November	O
+11	O
+,	O
+”	O
+the	O
+suit	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+lawsuit	O
+also	O
+asked	O
+that	O
+provisional	O
+ballots	O
+cast	O
+by	O
+a	O
+voter	O
+registered	O
+in	O
+another	O
+county	O
+be	O
+counted	O
+as	O
+if	O
+the	O
+voter	O
+had	O
+shown	O
+up	O
+at	O
+the	O
+wrong	O
+precinct	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+lawsuit	O
+says	O
+that	O
+of	O
+the	O
+1,556	O
+provisional	O
+ballots	O
+Fulton	O
+County	O
+reported	O
+having	O
+rejected	O
+by	O
+Nov.	O
+9	O
+,	O
+nearly	O
+1,000	O
+were	O
+disqualified	O
+because	O
+they	O
+were	O
+cast	O
+by	O
+voters	O
+whose	O
+registration	O
+records	O
+showed	O
+them	O
+registered	O
+in	O
+another	O
+county	O
+.	O
+
+Edgardo	O
+Cortes	O
+,	O
+who	O
+currently	O
+works	O
+as	O
+an	O
+election	O
+security	O
+adviser	O
+at	O
+New	O
+York	O
+University	O
+,	O
+said	O
+these	O
+uncounted	O
+provisional	O
+ballots	O
+could	O
+sway	O
+the	O
+election	O
+and	O
+,	O
+despite	O
+Kemp	O
+’s	O
+claims	O
+,	O
+his	O
+unofficial	O
+vote	O
+total	O
+is	O
+so	O
+close	O
+to	O
+50	O
+percent	O
+,	O
+a	O
+runoff	O
+is	O
+possible	O
+.	O
+
+Kemp	O
+was	O
+up	O
+50.2	O
+percent	O
+to	O
+Abrams	O
+’	O
+48.7	O
+percent	O
+early	O
+Tuesday	O
+.	O
+
+More	O
+than	O
+3.9	O
+million	O
+votes	O
+were	O
+cast	O
+in	O
+the	O
+election	O
+,	O
+and	O
+Abrams	O
+would	O
+need	O
+to	O
+acquire	O
+more	O
+than	O
+20,000	O
+additional	O
+votes	O
+to	O
+force	O
+a	O
+runoff	O
+.	O
+
+Abrams	O
+’	O
+campaign	O
+filed	O
+a	O
+lawsuit	O
+Sunday	O
+asking	O
+a	O
+federal	O
+court	O
+to	O
+push	O
+the	O
+deadline	O
+for	O
+counties	O
+to	O
+certify	O
+their	O
+results	O
+to	O
+Wednesday	O
+,	O
+while	O
+also	O
+requiring	O
+that	O
+elections	O
+authorities	O
+count	O
+certain	O
+provisional	O
+and	O
+absentee	O
+ballots	O
+that	O
+have	O
+been	O
+or	O
+would	O
+be	O
+rejected	O
+for	O
+“	O
+arbitrary	O
+reasons	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+“	O
+This	O
+ruling	O
+is	O
+a	O
+victory	O
+for	O
+the	O
+voters	O
+of	O
+Georgia	O
+because	O
+we	O
+are	O
+all	O
+stronger	O
+when	O
+every	O
+eligible	O
+voter	O
+is	O
+allowed	O
+to	O
+participate	O
+in	O
+our	O
+elections	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Sara	O
+Henderson	O
+,	O
+executive	O
+director	O
+for	O
+Common	O
+Cause	O
+Georgia	O
+,	O
+which	O
+filed	O
+the	O
+lawsuit	O
+,	O
+told	O
+AJC.com	O
+.	O
+
+Hey	O
+,	O
+Self	B-PROP
+Proclaimed	I-PROP
+"	I-PROP
+Fact	I-PROP
+Checkers	I-PROP
+"	O
+and	O
+Mainstream	O
+Media	O
+,	O
+Let	O
+'s	O
+Not	O
+Let	O
+That	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+Propaganda	O
+You	O
+'re	O
+Putting	O
+Out	O
+Go	O
+So	O
+Fast	O
+!	O
+
+Notice	O
+how	O
+quickly	O
+the	B-PROP
+drive	I-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+by	I-PROP
+media	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+self	I-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+proclaimed	I-PROP
+"	I-PROP
+fact	I-PROP
+checkers	I-PROP
+"	I-PROP
+gunned	B-PROP
+down	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+Trump	I-PROP
+administration	I-PROP
+and	O
+Infowars	O
+with	O
+their	O
+lying	B-PROP
+propaganda	I-PROP
+over	O
+the	O
+video	O
+that	O
+was	O
+enhanced	O
+,	O
+not	O
+doctored	O
+,	O
+to	O
+demonstrate	O
+that	O
+all	O
+of	O
+them	O
+and	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+are	O
+lying	B-PROP
+through	I-PROP
+their	I-PROP
+Communist	I-PROP
+teeth	I-PROP
+?	O
+
+Yep	O
+,	O
+I	O
+noticed	O
+too	O
+,	O
+and	O
+now	O
+they	O
+'re	O
+trying	O
+to	O
+move	O
+on	O
+,	O
+but	O
+I	O
+'m	O
+gon	O
+na	O
+get	O
+in	O
+one	O
+last	O
+bit	O
+before	O
+we	O
+do	O
+.	O
+
+Of	B-PROP
+course	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+Infowars	I-PROP
+'	I-PROP
+Paul	I-PROP
+Joseph	I-PROP
+Watson	I-PROP
+simply	I-PROP
+enhanced	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+video	I-PROP
+from	O
+C	O
+-	O
+SPAN	O
+,	O
+which	O
+was	O
+a	O
+gif	O
+image	O
+(	O
+motion	O
+picture	O
+)	O
+,	O
+in	B-PROP
+order	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+show	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+point	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+contact	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+lying	I-PROP
+media	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+"	I-PROP
+fact	I-PROP
+checkers	I-PROP
+"	I-PROP
+said	I-PROP
+did	I-PROP
+n't	I-PROP
+occur	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Watson	O
+then	O
+went	O
+on	O
+to	O
+be	O
+happy	O
+that	O
+President	O
+Trump	O
+backed	O
+him	O
+up	O
+on	O
+his	O
+comments	O
+about	O
+the	O
+video	O
+.	O
+
+Take	O
+a	O
+look	O
+,	O
+and	O
+as	O
+always	O
+,	O
+PJW	O
+is	O
+hilarious	B-PROP
+in	O
+his	O
+presentation	O
+.	O
+
+If	B-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+'re	I-PROP
+prepared	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+lie	I-PROP
+this	I-PROP
+shamelessly	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+what	I-PROP
+else	I-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+lying	I-PROP
+about	I-PROP
+?	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+Should	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+his	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+back	O
+?	O
+
+Should	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+his	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+back	O
+?	O
+
+Should	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+his	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+back	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+Yes	O
+,	O
+he	O
+should	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+it	O
+back	O
+.	O
+
+No	O
+,	O
+you	O
+ca	O
+n't	O
+act	O
+like	O
+a	O
+child	O
+and	O
+keep	O
+your	O
+pass	O
+.	O
+
+Maybe	O
+?	O
+
+I	O
+'m	O
+not	O
+sure	O
+if	O
+he	O
+should	O
+have	O
+.	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Name	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Freedom	O
+Outpost	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+SHARE	O
+:	O
+https://t.co/lP4GlbjJQM	O
+pic.twitter.com/iZUsXlZTLt	O
+—	O
+Paul	O
+Joseph	O
+Watson	O
+(	O
+@PrisonPlanet	O
+)	O
+November	O
+12	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+Steven	O
+Colbert	O
+,	O
+you	O
+'re	O
+lying	O
+.	O
+
+Jimmy	O
+Kimmel	O
+,	O
+you	O
+'re	O
+lying	O
+.	O
+
+CNN	O
+,	O
+you	O
+'re	O
+lying	O
+.	O
+
+CNN	O
+'s	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+told	O
+CNN	O
+'s	O
+Anderson	O
+Cooper	O
+that	O
+he	O
+*	O
+never	O
+*	O
+touched	O
+the	O
+female	O
+White	O
+House	O
+aide	O
+that	O
+tried	O
+to	O
+take	O
+the	O
+mic	O
+away	O
+from	O
+him	O
+.	O
+
+CNN	O
+showed	O
+the	O
+clip	O
+but	O
+edited	O
+out	O
+the	O
+part	O
+where	O
+he	O
+clearly	O
+touched	O
+her	O
+.	O
+
+Cooper	O
+offered	O
+no	O
+pushback	O
+on	O
+Acosta	O
+'s	O
+blatant	B-PROP
+lie	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+pic.twitter.com/65rP9xWWyI	O
+—	O
+Ryan	O
+Saavedra	O
+(	O
+@RealSaavedra	O
+)	O
+November	O
+8	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+,	O
+you	O
+'re	O
+lying	O
+.	O
+
+New	O
+York	O
+Times	O
+,	O
+you	O
+'re	O
+lying	O
+.	O
+
+Every	O
+media	O
+outlet	O
+from	O
+the	O
+Associated	O
+Press	O
+to	O
+NBC	O
+,	O
+you	B-PROP
+'re	I-PROP
+lying	I-PROP
+when	I-PROP
+you	I-PROP
+say	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+video	I-PROP
+was	I-PROP
+doctored	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+Acosta	I-PROP
+did	I-PROP
+n't	I-PROP
+touch	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+woman	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+At	O
+least	O
+C	O
+-	O
+SPAN	O
+is	O
+neutral	O
+in	O
+the	O
+matter	O
+and	O
+simply	O
+let	O
+the	O
+video	O
+reprove	O
+every	O
+single	O
+one	O
+of	O
+them	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+it	O
+'s	O
+more	O
+than	O
+that	O
+,	O
+self	B-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+proclaimed	I-PROP
+"	I-PROP
+fact	I-PROP
+checkers	I-PROP
+"	O
+like	O
+Snopes	O
+simply	O
+posted	O
+an	O
+Associated	O
+Press	O
+article	O
+,	O
+which	O
+clearly	O
+biased	O
+towards	O
+indicating	O
+the	O
+video	O
+was	O
+"	O
+doctored	O
+"	O
+by	O
+saying	O
+it	O
+was	O
+sped	O
+up	O
+,	O
+but	O
+that	O
+'s	O
+not	O
+doctoring	O
+.	O
+
+Doctoring	B-PROP
+is	O
+when	O
+you	O
+manipulate	O
+the	O
+content	O
+to	O
+misconstrue	O
+the	O
+reality	O
+of	O
+what	O
+took	O
+place	O
+.	O
+
+If	O
+you	O
+want	O
+to	O
+see	O
+doctoring	O
+,	O
+go	O
+to	O
+0:58	O
+of	O
+the	O
+video	O
+above	O
+,	O
+and	O
+do	O
+n't	O
+be	O
+drinking	O
+anything	O
+when	O
+you	O
+do	O
+because	O
+it	O
+'s	O
+hilarious	B-PROP
+.	O
+
+But	O
+it	O
+is	O
+n't	O
+just	O
+Snopes	O
+or	O
+Politifact	O
+and	O
+outlets	O
+like	O
+that	O
+.	O
+
+Take	O
+,	O
+for	O
+instance	O
+,	O
+websites	O
+like	O
+MediaBiasFactCheck.com	O
+,	O
+whom	O
+I	O
+had	O
+to	O
+have	O
+my	O
+attorneys	O
+send	O
+a	O
+letter	O
+for	O
+their	O
+libel	O
+and	O
+they	O
+did	O
+n't	O
+just	O
+correct	O
+it	O
+,	O
+they	O
+removed	O
+it	O
+entirely	O
+because	O
+they	O
+knew	O
+I	O
+was	O
+two	O
+days	O
+away	O
+from	O
+filing	O
+a	O
+lawsuit	O
+against	O
+them	O
+.	O
+
+MBFC	O
+actually	O
+called	O
+CNN	O
+"	O
+left	B-PROP
+biased	I-PROP
+,	O
+"	O
+which	O
+is	O
+correct	O
+but	O
+followed	O
+up	O
+with	O
+:	O
+
+Overall	O
+,	O
+we	O
+rate	O
+CNN	O
+left	O
+biased	O
+based	O
+on	O
+story	O
+selection	O
+that	O
+often	O
+favors	O
+the	O
+left	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+rate	O
+them	O
+Mixed	O
+for	O
+factual	O
+reporting	O
+due	O
+to	O
+misinformation	O
+and	O
+failed	B-PROP
+fact	I-PROP
+checks	I-PROP
+from	O
+guests	O
+and	O
+pundits	O
+.	O
+
+However	O
+,	O
+CNN	O
+’s	O
+straight	O
+news	O
+reporting	O
+would	O
+earn	O
+a	O
+High	O
+rating	O
+for	O
+factual	O
+reporting	O
+.	O
+
+(	O
+5/16/2016	O
+)	O
+Updated	O
+(	O
+D.	O
+Van	O
+Zandt	O
+6/15/2018	O
+)	O
+
+Straight	B-PROP
+reporting	I-PROP
+?	O
+
+You	B-PROP
+must	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+kidding	I-PROP
+me	I-PROP
+?	I-PROP
+
+Did	B-PROP
+David	I-PROP
+Van	I-PROP
+Zandt	I-PROP
+not	I-PROP
+watch	I-PROP
+Jim	I-PROP
+Acosta	I-PROP
+lie	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+Anderson	I-PROP
+Cooper	I-PROP
+about	I-PROP
+this	I-PROP
+episode	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+Cooper	I-PROP
+just	I-PROP
+sat	I-PROP
+there	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+let	I-PROP
+him	I-PROP
+lie	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+editing	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+video	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+not	I-PROP
+even	I-PROP
+show	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+point	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+contact	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+question	I-PROP
+?	I-PROP
+
+Why	B-PROP
+yes	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+yes	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+he	I-PROP
+did	I-PROP
+!	O
+
+Not	B-PROP
+only	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+but	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+appears	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+MBFC	I-PROP
+does	I-PROP
+n't	I-PROP
+know	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+documented	I-PROP
+history	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+CNN	I-PROP
+'s	I-PROP
+complete	I-PROP
+fabrication	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+"	I-PROP
+news	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+"	I-PROP
+telling	I-PROP
+stories	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+never	I-PROP
+happened	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+MBFC	O
+is	O
+n't	O
+qualified	O
+to	O
+comment	O
+on	O
+the	O
+subject	O
+.	O
+
+It	O
+is	O
+n't	O
+just	O
+MBFC	O
+though	O
+.	O
+
+Newcomer	O
+NewsGuard	O
+also	O
+covers	O
+for	O
+CNN	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+is	O
+supposed	O
+to	O
+be	O
+an	O
+outlet	O
+,	O
+at	O
+least	O
+what	O
+I	O
+was	O
+told	O
+in	O
+email	O
+and	O
+phone	O
+communication	O
+,	O
+that	O
+is	O
+simply	O
+to	O
+determine	O
+transparency	O
+of	O
+websites	O
+.	O
+
+Instead	B-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+not	I-PROP
+only	I-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+but	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+go	I-PROP
+on	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+far	I-PROP
+more	I-PROP
+than	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+In	O
+rating	O
+CNN	O
+,	O
+NewsGuard	O
+posts	O
+this	O
+nonsense	B-PROP
+.	O
+
+I	O
+'m	O
+sure	O
+NewsGuard	O
+,	O
+Yemile	O
+Bucay	O
+,	O
+Anna	O
+-	O
+Sophie	O
+Harling	O
+and	O
+Amy	O
+Westfeldt	O
+need	O
+to	O
+update	O
+this	O
+in	O
+the	O
+light	O
+of	O
+the	O
+obvious	O
+lies	O
+and	O
+editing	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Acosta	O
+video	O
+and	O
+decades	O
+of	O
+documented	O
+,	O
+outright	B-PROP
+lies	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+propaganda	I-PROP
+by	O
+the	B-PROP
+Clown	I-PROP
+News	I-PROP
+Network	I-PROP
+,	O
+but	B-PROP
+you	I-PROP
+ca	I-PROP
+n't	I-PROP
+expect	I-PROP
+real	I-PROP
+transparency	I-PROP
+from	I-PROP
+an	I-PROP
+outlet	I-PROP
+like	I-PROP
+Newsguard	I-PROP
+whose	I-PROP
+writers	I-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+n't	I-PROP
+transparent	I-PROP
+about	I-PROP
+their	I-PROP
+own	I-PROP
+political	I-PROP
+bias	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+can	I-PROP
+you	I-PROP
+?	I-PROP
+
+Nope	O
+,	O
+you	O
+ca	O
+n't	O
+,	O
+and	O
+you	O
+ca	O
+n't	O
+expect	O
+it	O
+when	O
+some	O
+of	O
+those	O
+writers	O
+write	O
+for	O
+other	O
+publications	O
+that	O
+do	O
+n't	O
+measure	O
+up	O
+to	O
+NewsGuard	O
+'s	O
+standards	O
+either	O
+.	O
+
+The	B-PROP
+reason	I-PROP
+this	I-PROP
+little	I-PROP
+incident	I-PROP
+should	I-PROP
+n't	I-PROP
+be	I-PROP
+let	I-PROP
+go	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+so	I-PROP
+soon	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+one	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+clearest	I-PROP
+demonstrations	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+media	I-PROP
+'s	I-PROP
+bias	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+which	I-PROP
+we	I-PROP
+all	I-PROP
+have	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+lies	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+propaganda	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+It	O
+should	O
+be	O
+used	O
+over	O
+and	O
+over	O
+in	O
+article	O
+after	O
+article	O
+to	O
+remind	O
+people	O
+about	O
+the	B-PROP
+total	I-PROP
+dishonesty	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+complete	I-PROP
+disregard	I-PROP
+for	O
+reporting	O
+the	O
+facts	O
+by	O
+outlets	O
+such	O
+as	O
+CNN	O
+and	O
+to	O
+not	B-PROP
+blindly	I-PROP
+trust	I-PROP
+self	B-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+proclaimed	I-PROP
+fact	I-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+checkers	I-PROP
+who	I-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+not	I-PROP
+tell	I-PROP
+you	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+truth	I-PROP
+either	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+CNN	O
+has	B-PROP
+lost	I-PROP
+its	I-PROP
+mind	I-PROP
+to	O
+the	O
+point	O
+that	O
+they	O
+are	O
+suing	O
+over	O
+Acosta	O
+losing	O
+his	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+was	O
+their	O
+inside	O
+boy	O
+,	O
+after	O
+all	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+the	O
+real	O
+irony	O
+here	O
+is	O
+that	O
+the	O
+media	O
+labeled	O
+Paul	O
+Joseph	O
+Watson	O
+and	O
+Infowars	O
+as	O
+"	O
+conspiracy	B-PROP
+theorists	I-PROP
+"	O
+and	O
+yet	O
+,	O
+PJW	O
+has	O
+exposed	O
+their	O
+blatant	B-PROP
+conspiracy	I-PROP
+to	B-PROP
+smear	I-PROP
+President	I-PROP
+Trump	O
+,	O
+Sarah	O
+Sanders	O
+and	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+aide	O
+.	O
+
+And	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+believes	O
+he	O
+and	O
+CNN	O
+deal	O
+with	O
+facts	O
+and	O
+Infowars	O
+does	O
+n't	O
+.	O
+
+Yeah	B-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+right	I-PROP
+!	O
+
+I	O
+'m	O
+sorry	O
+Jim	O
+,	O
+I	O
+ca	O
+n't	O
+hear	O
+you	O
+over	O
+the	O
+booming	O
+voice	O
+of	O
+your	O
+hypocrisy	B-PROP
+!	O
+
+Article	O
+posted	O
+with	O
+permission	O
+from	O
+The	O
+Washington	O
+Standard	O
+
+Judge	O
+Orders	O
+White	O
+House	O
+To	O
+Restore	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+'	O
+Press	O
+Pass	O
+-	O
+Trump	O
+Responds	O
+
+A	O
+Trump	O
+appointed	O
+federal	O
+judge	O
+has	O
+order	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+to	O
+restore	O
+CNN	O
+reporter	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+'s	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+after	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+revoked	O
+it	O
+for	O
+his	O
+badgering	O
+of	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+press	O
+secretary	O
+,	O
+his	O
+handling	O
+of	O
+a	O
+White	O
+House	O
+aide	O
+and	O
+his	O
+continual	O
+questioning	O
+when	O
+he	O
+was	O
+allowed	O
+to	O
+ask	O
+a	O
+question	O
+and	O
+follow	O
+up	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+ruling	O
+has	O
+no	O
+basis	O
+in	O
+the	O
+Constitution	O
+,	O
+mind	O
+you	O
+.	O
+
+USA	O
+Today	O
+reported	O
+on	O
+the	O
+ruling	O
+:	O
+
+WASHINGTON	O
+–	O
+A	O
+federal	O
+judge	O
+on	O
+Friday	O
+ordered	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+to	O
+restore	O
+CNN	O
+reporter	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+’s	O
+press	O
+badge	O
+,	O
+which	O
+had	O
+been	O
+revoked	O
+earlier	O
+this	O
+month	O
+after	O
+a	O
+contentious	O
+exchange	O
+at	O
+a	O
+news	O
+conference	O
+with	O
+President	O
+Donald	O
+Trump	O
+.	O
+
+U.S.	O
+District	O
+Court	O
+Judge	O
+Timothy	O
+Kelly	O
+,	O
+a	O
+Trump	O
+appointee	O
+,	O
+said	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+had	O
+violated	O
+Acosta	O
+’s	O
+Fifth	O
+Amendment	O
+right	O
+to	O
+due	O
+process	O
+by	O
+suspending	O
+his	O
+press	O
+badge	O
+without	O
+explanation	O
+or	O
+a	O
+chance	O
+for	O
+CNN	O
+to	O
+appeal	O
+the	O
+decision	O
+.	O
+
+Kelly	O
+said	O
+White	O
+House	O
+officials	O
+could	O
+n’t	O
+say	O
+who	O
+made	O
+the	O
+decision	O
+or	O
+how	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+judge	O
+ordered	O
+the	O
+government	O
+to	O
+restore	O
+the	O
+credential	O
+while	O
+the	O
+rest	O
+of	O
+the	O
+case	O
+–	O
+which	O
+drew	O
+a	B-PROP
+slew	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+support	I-PROP
+from	O
+other	O
+media	O
+outlets	O
+,	O
+including	O
+USA	O
+TODAY	O
+–	O
+is	O
+argued	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+This	O
+court	O
+can	O
+not	O
+restore	O
+Mr.	O
+Acosta	O
+’s	O
+access	O
+to	O
+press	O
+briefings	O
+that	O
+have	O
+already	O
+been	O
+held	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Kelly	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+Kelly	O
+said	O
+he	O
+has	O
+n’t	O
+considered	O
+at	O
+all	O
+yet	O
+whether	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+violated	O
+Acosta	O
+’s	O
+First	O
+Amendment	O
+rights	O
+.	O
+
+More	O
+arguments	O
+are	O
+expected	O
+Tuesday	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+I	O
+trust	O
+this	O
+litigation	O
+will	O
+continue	O
+at	O
+a	O
+rapid	O
+pace	O
+.	O
+”	O
+Kelly	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+What	O
+?	O
+
+Due	O
+process	O
+?	O
+
+Wait	O
+,	O
+Acosta	O
+was	O
+not	O
+charged	O
+with	O
+a	O
+crime	O
+.	O
+
+Neither	O
+his	O
+property	O
+,	O
+liberty	O
+nor	O
+his	O
+life	O
+was	O
+taken	O
+.	O
+
+There	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+no	I-PROP
+due	I-PROP
+process	I-PROP
+here	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+
+Should	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+his	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+back	O
+?	O
+
+Should	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+his	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+back	O
+?	O
+
+Should	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+his	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+back	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+Yes	O
+,	O
+he	O
+should	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+it	O
+back	O
+.	O
+
+No	O
+,	O
+you	O
+ca	O
+n't	O
+act	O
+like	O
+a	O
+child	O
+and	O
+keep	O
+your	O
+pass	O
+.	O
+
+Maybe	O
+?	O
+
+I	O
+'m	O
+not	O
+sure	O
+if	O
+he	O
+should	O
+have	O
+.	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Phone	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Freedom	O
+Outpost	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+The	B-PROP
+Fifth	I-PROP
+Amendment	I-PROP
+has	I-PROP
+no	I-PROP
+business	I-PROP
+being	I-PROP
+brought	I-PROP
+up	I-PROP
+here	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+
+This	O
+is	O
+an	O
+issue	O
+of	O
+privilege	O
+,	O
+not	O
+rights	O
+.	O
+
+I	B-PROP
+have	I-PROP
+made	I-PROP
+this	I-PROP
+point	I-PROP
+before	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+this	I-PROP
+judge	I-PROP
+apparently	I-PROP
+does	I-PROP
+n't	I-PROP
+get	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+I	O
+want	O
+my	O
+White	O
+House	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+!	O
+
+So	O
+does	O
+Infowars	O
+.	O
+
+Will	O
+Judge	O
+Kelly	O
+demand	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+provide	O
+us	O
+with	O
+one	O
+as	O
+a	O
+"	O
+right	O
+"	O
+?	O
+
+Nope	O
+,	O
+not	O
+gon	O
+na	O
+happen	O
+.	O
+
+Because	O
+it	O
+'s	O
+not	O
+a	O
+right	O
+.	O
+
+Yet	O
+,	O
+this	O
+judge	O
+orders	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+to	O
+restore	O
+the	O
+credentials	O
+?	O
+
+Give	B-PROP
+me	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+break	I-PROP
+!	O
+
+Acosta	O
+'s	O
+First	O
+Amendment	O
+rights	O
+were	O
+n't	O
+violated	O
+either	O
+.	O
+
+Furthermore	O
+,	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+did	O
+say	O
+they	O
+were	O
+willing	O
+to	O
+have	O
+another	O
+reporter	O
+in	O
+to	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+press	O
+from	O
+CNN	O
+,	O
+but	O
+that	O
+just	O
+was	O
+n't	O
+good	O
+enough	O
+.	O
+
+CNN	O
+tweeted	O
+:	O
+"	O
+Statement	O
+from	O
+CNN	O
+and	O
+@	O
+Acosta	O
+on	O
+today	O
+’s	O
+ruling	O
+:	O
+“	O
+We	O
+are	O
+gratified	O
+with	O
+this	O
+result	O
+and	O
+we	O
+look	O
+forward	O
+to	O
+a	O
+full	O
+resolution	O
+in	O
+the	O
+coming	O
+days	O
+.	O
+
+Our	O
+sincere	O
+thanks	O
+to	O
+all	O
+who	O
+have	O
+supported	O
+not	O
+just	O
+CNN	O
+,	O
+but	O
+a	O
+free	O
+,	O
+strong	O
+and	O
+independent	O
+American	O
+press	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Statement	O
+from	O
+CNN	O
+and	O
+@Acosta	O
+on	O
+today	O
+’s	O
+ruling	O
+:	O
+“	O
+We	O
+are	O
+gratified	O
+with	O
+this	O
+result	O
+and	O
+we	O
+look	O
+forward	O
+to	O
+a	O
+full	O
+resolution	O
+in	O
+the	O
+coming	O
+days	O
+.	O
+
+Our	O
+sincere	O
+thanks	O
+to	O
+all	O
+who	O
+have	O
+supported	O
+not	O
+just	O
+CNN	O
+,	O
+but	O
+a	O
+free	O
+,	O
+strong	O
+and	O
+independent	O
+American	O
+press	O
+.	O
+”	O
+—	O
+CNN	O
+Communications	O
+(	O
+@CNNPR	O
+)	O
+November	O
+16	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+More	O
+like	O
+a	B-PROP
+strong	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+lying	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+propagandizing	I-PROP
+press	I-PROP
+,	O
+right	O
+CNN	O
+?	O
+
+President	O
+Trump	O
+responded	O
+to	O
+the	O
+order	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+told	O
+Fox	O
+News	O
+'	O
+Chris	O
+Wallace	O
+,	O
+"	O
+Yeah	O
+,	O
+its	O
+fine	O
+,	O
+I	O
+mean	O
+it	O
+’s	O
+not	O
+a	O
+big	O
+deal	O
+.	O
+
+What	O
+they	O
+said	O
+,	O
+though	O
+,	O
+is	O
+that	O
+we	O
+have	O
+to	O
+create	O
+rules	O
+and	O
+regulations	O
+for	O
+conduct	O
+etc	O
+.	O
+
+etc	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+’re	O
+doing	O
+that	O
+,	O
+were	O
+going	O
+to	O
+write	O
+them	O
+up	O
+right	O
+now	O
+.	O
+
+It	O
+’s	O
+not	O
+a	O
+big	O
+deal	O
+and	O
+if	O
+he	O
+misbehaves	O
+,	O
+we	O
+’ll	O
+throw	O
+him	O
+out	O
+or	O
+we	O
+’ll	O
+stop	O
+the	O
+news	O
+conference	O
+.	O
+"	O
+
+In	O
+speaking	O
+about	O
+the	O
+rules	O
+and	O
+regulations	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+is	O
+writing	O
+up	O
+,	O
+Trump	O
+added	O
+,	O
+"	O
+We	O
+’re	O
+writing	O
+them	O
+now	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+’ll	O
+have	O
+rules	O
+of	O
+decorum	O
+,	O
+you	O
+know	O
+you	O
+ca	O
+n’t	O
+keep	O
+asking	O
+questions	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+had	O
+a	O
+lot	O
+of	O
+reporters	O
+in	O
+that	O
+room	O
+,	O
+many	O
+many	O
+reporters	O
+in	O
+that	O
+room	O
+and	O
+they	O
+were	O
+unable	O
+to	O
+ask	O
+questions	O
+because	O
+this	O
+guy	O
+gets	O
+up	O
+and	O
+starts	O
+,	O
+you	O
+know	O
+,	O
+doing	O
+what	O
+he	O
+’s	O
+supposed	O
+to	O
+be	O
+doing	O
+for	O
+him	O
+and	O
+for	O
+CNN	O
+and	O
+you	O
+know	O
+just	O
+shouting	O
+out	O
+questions	O
+and	O
+making	O
+statements	O
+,	O
+too	O
+.	O
+"	O
+
+You	O
+know	O
+that	O
+is	O
+n't	O
+going	O
+to	O
+stop	O
+someone	O
+like	O
+Acosta	O
+,	O
+who	B-PROP
+claimed	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+deal	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+facts	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+truth	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+but	I-PROP
+clearly	I-PROP
+demonstrated	I-PROP
+he	I-PROP
+was	I-PROP
+all	I-PROP
+about	I-PROP
+lies	I-PROP
+when	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+came	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+putting	I-PROP
+his	I-PROP
+hands	I-PROP
+on	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+White	I-PROP
+House	I-PROP
+aide	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+The	O
+order	O
+by	O
+Judge	O
+Kelly	O
+is	O
+a	O
+temporary	O
+one	O
+that	O
+lasts	O
+for	O
+14	O
+days	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+I	O
+will	O
+say	O
+this	O
+,	O
+look	O
+,	O
+nobody	B-PROP
+believes	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+First	I-PROP
+Amendment	I-PROP
+more	I-PROP
+than	I-PROP
+I	I-PROP
+do	I-PROP
+and	O
+if	O
+I	O
+think	O
+somebody	O
+is	O
+acting	O
+out	O
+of	O
+sorts	O
+I	O
+will	O
+leave	O
+,	O
+"	O
+Trump	O
+continued	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+I	O
+will	O
+say	O
+thank	O
+you	O
+very	O
+much	O
+everybody	O
+,	O
+I	O
+appreciate	O
+you	O
+coming	O
+and	O
+I	O
+’ll	O
+leave	O
+.	O
+
+And	O
+those	O
+reporters	O
+will	O
+not	O
+be	O
+too	O
+friendly	O
+to	O
+whoever	B-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+that	I-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+acting	I-PROP
+up	I-PROP
+.	O
+”	O
+
+White	O
+House	O
+Press	O
+Secretary	O
+Sarah	O
+Sanders	O
+issued	O
+a	O
+statement	O
+following	O
+the	O
+judge	O
+'s	O
+ruling	O
+on	O
+Thursday	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Today	O
+,	O
+the	O
+court	O
+made	O
+clear	O
+that	O
+there	O
+is	O
+no	O
+absolute	O
+First	O
+Amendment	O
+right	O
+to	O
+access	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+response	O
+to	O
+the	O
+court	O
+,	O
+we	O
+will	O
+temporarily	O
+reinstate	O
+the	O
+reporter	O
+’s	O
+hard	O
+pass	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+will	O
+also	O
+further	O
+develop	O
+rules	O
+and	O
+processes	O
+to	O
+ensure	O
+fair	O
+and	O
+orderly	O
+press	O
+conferences	O
+in	O
+the	O
+future	O
+.	O
+
+There	O
+must	O
+be	O
+decorum	O
+at	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Well	O
+,	O
+I	O
+ca	O
+n't	O
+wait	O
+to	O
+see	O
+the	O
+next	O
+press	O
+conference	O
+.	O
+
+Perhaps	O
+there	O
+is	O
+an	O
+easier	O
+way	O
+around	O
+all	O
+of	O
+this	O
+.	O
+
+Perhaps	O
+from	O
+now	O
+on	O
+,	O
+President	O
+Trump	O
+should	O
+ignore	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+and	O
+take	O
+anyone	O
+and	O
+everyone	O
+else	O
+'s	O
+questions	O
+in	O
+the	O
+room	O
+but	O
+his	O
+questions	O
+.	O
+
+See	O
+how	O
+he	O
+likes	O
+them	O
+apples	O
+.	O
+
+Not	O
+Surprising	O
+:	O
+Now	O
+Fox	O
+News	O
+Is	O
+Supporting	O
+CNN	O
+&	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+
+Fox	O
+News	O
+is	O
+largely	O
+controlled	O
+opposition	O
+despite	O
+what	O
+many	O
+may	O
+think	O
+.	O
+
+They	O
+have	O
+a	O
+couple	O
+of	O
+people	O
+that	O
+actually	O
+are	O
+conservative	O
+.	O
+
+Other	O
+than	O
+that	O
+,	O
+they	O
+have	O
+liberals	O
+and	O
+neo	O
+-	O
+cons	O
+running	B-PROP
+rampant	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Many	O
+were	O
+surprised	O
+to	O
+discover	O
+that	O
+Fox	O
+News	O
+not	O
+only	O
+is	O
+supporting	O
+lying	B-PROP
+CNN	I-PROP
+and	O
+lying	B-PROP
+Jim	I-PROP
+Acosta	I-PROP
+,	O
+but	O
+they	O
+are	O
+even	O
+going	O
+so	O
+far	O
+as	O
+to	O
+file	O
+an	O
+amicus	O
+brief	O
+with	O
+the	O
+US	O
+district	O
+court	O
+over	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+'s	O
+revoking	O
+of	O
+Acosta	O
+'s	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+.	O
+
+One	O
+would	O
+think	O
+these	O
+people	O
+would	O
+understand	O
+that	O
+this	O
+is	O
+not	O
+a	O
+First	O
+Amendment	O
+issue	O
+.	O
+
+If	O
+it	O
+were	O
+,	O
+they	O
+would	O
+n't	O
+have	O
+to	O
+apply	O
+for	O
+a	O
+White	O
+House	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+is	O
+a	O
+privilege	O
+issue	O
+and	O
+it	O
+seems	O
+that	O
+Acosta	O
+wore	B-PROP
+out	O
+his	O
+welcome	O
+with	O
+his	O
+attacks	O
+on	O
+Sarah	O
+Sanders	O
+,	O
+being	O
+belligerent	B-PROP
+during	O
+his	O
+time	O
+asking	O
+a	O
+question(s	O
+)	O
+of	O
+President	O
+Donald	O
+Trump	O
+,	O
+and	O
+his	O
+pushing	O
+aside	O
+a	O
+White	O
+House	O
+aide	O
+who	O
+simply	O
+tried	O
+to	O
+remove	O
+the	O
+microphone	O
+from	O
+him	O
+.	O
+
+Trump	O
+was	O
+right	O
+,	O
+Acosta	O
+is	O
+a	O
+"	O
+rude	B-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+terrible	I-PROP
+person	I-PROP
+.	O
+"	O
+
+take	O
+our	O
+poll	O
+-	O
+story	O
+continues	O
+below	O
+
+Should	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+his	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+back	O
+?	O
+
+Should	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+his	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+back	O
+?	O
+
+Should	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+his	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+back	O
+?	O
+
+*	O
+Yes	O
+,	O
+he	O
+should	O
+have	O
+gotten	O
+it	O
+back	O
+.	O
+
+No	O
+,	O
+you	O
+ca	O
+n't	O
+act	O
+like	O
+a	O
+child	O
+and	O
+keep	O
+your	O
+pass	O
+.	O
+
+Maybe	O
+?	O
+
+I	O
+'m	O
+not	O
+sure	O
+if	O
+he	O
+should	O
+have	O
+.	O
+
+Email	O
+*	O
+
+Email	O
+This	O
+field	O
+is	O
+for	O
+validation	O
+purposes	O
+and	O
+should	O
+be	O
+left	O
+unchanged	O
+.	O
+
+Completing	O
+this	O
+poll	O
+grants	O
+you	O
+access	O
+to	O
+Freedom	O
+Outpost	O
+updates	O
+free	O
+of	O
+charge	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+may	O
+opt	O
+out	O
+at	O
+anytime	O
+.	O
+
+You	O
+also	O
+agree	O
+to	O
+this	O
+site	O
+'s	O
+Privacy	O
+Policy	O
+and	O
+Terms	O
+of	O
+Use	O
+.	O
+
+However	O
+,	O
+the	O
+cable	O
+news	O
+channel	O
+is	O
+showing	O
+more	O
+and	O
+more	O
+that	O
+it	O
+is	O
+not	O
+fair	O
+and	O
+balanced	O
+and	O
+is	O
+far	O
+from	O
+what	O
+conservatives	O
+think	O
+it	O
+is	O
+as	O
+it	O
+blasted	B-PROP
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+about	O
+not	O
+giving	O
+little	O
+Jimmy	O
+his	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+back	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+a	O
+statement	O
+by	O
+Fox	O
+News	O
+President	O
+Jay	O
+Wallace	O
+,	O
+he	O
+wrote	O
+:	O
+
+“	O
+Fox	O
+News	O
+supports	O
+CNN	O
+in	O
+its	O
+legal	O
+effort	O
+to	O
+regain	O
+its	O
+White	O
+House	O
+reporter	O
+’s	O
+press	O
+credential	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+intend	O
+to	O
+file	O
+an	O
+amicus	O
+brief	O
+with	O
+the	O
+U.S.	O
+District	O
+Court	O
+.	O
+
+Secret	O
+Service	O
+passes	O
+for	O
+working	O
+White	O
+House	O
+journalists	O
+should	O
+never	O
+be	O
+weaponized	O
+.	O
+
+While	O
+we	O
+do	O
+n’t	O
+condone	O
+the	O
+growing	O
+antagonistic	B-PROP
+tone	O
+by	O
+both	O
+the	O
+president	O
+and	O
+the	O
+press	O
+at	O
+recent	O
+media	O
+avails	O
+,	O
+we	O
+do	O
+support	O
+a	O
+free	O
+press	O
+,	O
+access	O
+and	O
+open	O
+exchanges	O
+for	O
+the	B-PROP
+American	I-PROP
+people	I-PROP
+.	O
+"	O
+
+So	O
+,	O
+file	O
+it	O
+!	O
+
+On	O
+the	O
+basis	O
+of	O
+what	O
+,	O
+Mr.	O
+Wallace	O
+?	O
+
+The	B-PROP
+free	I-PROP
+press	I-PROP
+still	I-PROP
+exists	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+you	I-PROP
+know	I-PROP
+what	I-PROP
+?	O
+
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+and	O
+CNN	O
+continue	B-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+lie	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+just	I-PROP
+like	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+have	I-PROP
+for	I-PROP
+decades	I-PROP
+,	O
+and	O
+here	O
+'s	O
+the	O
+proof	O
+.	O
+
+Look	B-PROP
+how	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+doctored	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+video	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+not	I-PROP
+show	I-PROP
+what	I-PROP
+clearly	I-PROP
+took	I-PROP
+place	I-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+then	I-PROP
+lied	I-PROP
+about	I-PROP
+it	I-PROP
+,	O
+and	O
+I	O
+suppose	O
+Fox	O
+falls	O
+right	O
+in	O
+line	O
+with	O
+that	O
+behavior	O
+.	O
+
+So	O
+,	O
+Fox	O
+joins	O
+with	O
+the	B-PROP
+least	I-PROP
+trusted	I-PROP
+name	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+news	I-PROP
+,	O
+the	B-PROP
+Clown	I-PROP
+News	I-PROP
+Network	I-PROP
+,	O
+to	O
+go	O
+after	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+on	O
+something	O
+that	O
+is	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+'s	O
+prerogative	O
+and	O
+claim	O
+it	O
+'s	O
+about	O
+free	O
+press	O
+.	O
+
+It	B-PROP
+'s	I-PROP
+not	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+Fox	O
+reported	O
+:	O
+
+The	O
+White	O
+House	O
+Correspondents	O
+’	O
+Association	O
+–	O
+of	O
+which	O
+Fox	O
+News	O
+is	O
+a	O
+member	O
+–	O
+issued	O
+a	O
+statement	O
+in	O
+support	O
+of	O
+CNN	O
+’s	O
+decision	O
+to	O
+take	O
+legal	O
+action	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+We	O
+continue	O
+to	O
+urge	O
+the	O
+administration	O
+to	O
+reverse	O
+course	O
+and	O
+fully	O
+reinstate	O
+CNN	O
+’s	O
+correspondent	O
+,	O
+”	O
+WHCA	O
+President	O
+Olivier	O
+Knox	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+The	O
+President	O
+of	O
+the	O
+United	O
+States	O
+should	O
+not	O
+be	O
+in	O
+the	O
+business	O
+of	O
+arbitrarily	B-PROP
+picking	O
+the	O
+men	O
+and	O
+women	O
+who	O
+cover	O
+him	O
+.	O
+”	O
+However	O
+,	O
+several	O
+prominent	O
+media	O
+members	O
+–	O
+such	O
+as	O
+Pulitzer	O
+Prize	O
+-	O
+winning	O
+Watergate	O
+journalist	O
+Bob	O
+Woodward	O
+–	O
+have	O
+criticized	O
+CNN	O
+over	O
+the	O
+lawsuit	O
+.	O
+
+As	O
+they	O
+should	O
+.	O
+
+It	O
+'s	O
+frivolous	O
+,	O
+but	O
+because	O
+they	O
+are	O
+immature	O
+children	O
+over	O
+at	O
+CNN	O
+,	O
+it	O
+'s	O
+not	O
+surprising	O
+,	O
+and	O
+frankly	O
+,	O
+it	O
+'s	O
+no	O
+surprise	O
+coming	O
+from	O
+Fox	O
+either	O
+.	O
+
+White	O
+House	O
+Press	O
+Secretary	O
+Sarah	O
+Sanders	O
+called	O
+the	O
+CNN	O
+lawsuit	O
+"	O
+grandstanding	B-PROP
+.	O
+"	O
+
+I	O
+wonder	O
+what	O
+she	O
+will	O
+call	O
+the	O
+amicus	O
+brief	O
+from	O
+Fox	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+This	B-PROP
+is	I-PROP
+just	I-PROP
+more	I-PROP
+grandstanding	I-PROP
+from	I-PROP
+CNN	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+and	O
+we	B-PROP
+will	I-PROP
+vigorously	B-PROP
+defend	I-PROP
+against	I-PROP
+this	I-PROP
+lawsuit	I-PROP
+,	O
+”	O
+Sanders	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+CNN	O
+,	O
+who	O
+has	O
+nearly	O
+50	O
+additional	O
+hard	O
+pass	O
+holders	O
+,	O
+and	O
+Mr.	O
+Acosta	O
+is	O
+no	O
+more	O
+or	O
+less	O
+special	O
+than	O
+any	O
+other	O
+media	O
+outlet	O
+or	O
+reporter	O
+with	O
+respect	O
+to	O
+the	O
+First	O
+Amendment	O
+.	O
+
+After	O
+Mr.	O
+Acosta	O
+asked	O
+the	O
+President	O
+two	O
+questions	O
+—	O
+each	O
+of	O
+which	O
+the	O
+President	O
+answered	O
+—	O
+he	O
+physically	O
+refused	O
+to	O
+surrender	O
+a	O
+White	O
+House	O
+microphone	O
+to	O
+an	O
+intern	O
+,	O
+so	O
+that	O
+other	O
+reporters	O
+might	O
+ask	O
+their	O
+questions	O
+.	O
+
+This	O
+was	O
+not	O
+the	O
+first	O
+time	O
+this	O
+reporter	O
+has	O
+inappropriately	O
+refused	O
+to	O
+yield	O
+to	O
+other	O
+reporters	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Of	O
+course	O
+,	O
+CNN	O
+was	O
+thrilled	O
+as	O
+Fox	O
+more	O
+than	O
+likely	O
+helped	O
+them	O
+grow	O
+a	O
+little	O
+in	O
+ratings	O
+by	O
+issuing	O
+support	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+propaganda	O
+outlet	O
+tweeted	O
+out	O
+Fox	O
+'s	O
+statement	O
+.	O
+
+Fox	O
+News	O
+will	O
+file	O
+an	O
+amicus	O
+brief	O
+in	O
+support	O
+of	O
+@Acosta	O
+and	O
+CNN	O
+.	O
+
+Thank	O
+you	O
+@FoxNews	O
+!	O
+
+Statement	O
+from	O
+Jay	O
+Wallace	O
+below	O
+:	O
+pic.twitter.com/1EyRkho0TK	O
+—	O
+CNN	O
+Communications	O
+(	O
+@CNNPR	O
+)	O
+November	O
+14	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+
+Here	O
+'s	O
+the	O
+thing	O
+,	O
+if	O
+it	O
+is	O
+a	O
+right	O
+to	O
+have	O
+a	O
+press	O
+pass	O
+to	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+,	O
+where	O
+is	O
+mine	O
+?	O
+
+and	O
+yours	O
+?	O
+
+How	O
+about	O
+Infowars	O
+?	O
+
+See	O
+?	O
+
+It	O
+is	O
+n't	O
+a	O
+right	O
+and	O
+Fox	O
+News	O
+just	O
+pulled	O
+the	O
+mask	O
+off	O
+,	O
+people	O
+.	O
+
+Do	O
+you	O
+see	O
+who	O
+they	O
+really	O
+are	O
+now	O
+?	O
+
+If	O
+not	O
+,	O
+I	O
+ca	O
+n't	O
+help	O
+you	O
+.	O
+
+Court	O
+orders	O
+White	O
+House	O
+to	O
+restore	O
+CNN	O
+correspondent	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+’s	O
+press	O
+credential	O
+
+CNN	O
+has	O
+won	O
+the	O
+first	O
+round	O
+of	O
+its	O
+legal	O
+battle	O
+to	O
+get	O
+correspondent	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+back	O
+in	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+.	O
+
+U.S.	O
+District	O
+Court	O
+Judge	O
+Timothy	O
+Kelly	O
+granted	O
+the	O
+cable	O
+news	O
+network	O
+’s	O
+request	O
+for	O
+a	O
+temporary	O
+restraining	O
+order	O
+and	O
+preliminary	O
+injunction	O
+Friday	O
+that	O
+restored	O
+Acosta	O
+’s	O
+White	O
+House	O
+press	O
+credential	O
+.	O
+
+Kelly	O
+ordered	O
+that	O
+Acosta	O
+be	O
+reinstated	O
+immediately	O
+.	O
+
+He	O
+did	O
+not	O
+rule	O
+on	O
+CNN	O
+’s	O
+claim	O
+that	O
+the	O
+revocation	O
+of	O
+the	O
+journalist	O
+’s	O
+pass	O
+violated	O
+his	O
+rights	O
+under	O
+the	O
+First	O
+Amendment	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+he	O
+said	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+did	O
+not	O
+provide	O
+Acosta	O
+with	O
+due	O
+process	O
+to	O
+legally	O
+remove	O
+his	O
+pass	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+ruling	O
+followed	O
+a	O
+court	O
+hearing	O
+held	O
+Wednesday	O
+in	O
+Washington	O
+,	O
+where	O
+lawyers	O
+for	O
+CNN	O
+and	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+faced	O
+off	O
+over	O
+the	O
+issue	O
+of	O
+press	O
+access	O
+.	O
+
+CNN	O
+had	O
+the	O
+broad	O
+support	O
+of	O
+other	O
+news	O
+organizations	O
+that	O
+believed	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+’s	O
+actions	O
+posed	O
+a	O
+challenge	O
+to	O
+press	O
+freedom	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+We	O
+are	O
+gratified	O
+with	O
+this	O
+result	O
+and	O
+we	O
+look	O
+forward	O
+to	O
+a	O
+full	O
+resolution	O
+in	O
+the	O
+coming	O
+days	O
+,	O
+”	O
+a	O
+CNN	O
+representative	O
+said	O
+in	O
+a	O
+statement	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Our	O
+sincere	O
+thanks	O
+to	O
+all	O
+who	O
+have	O
+supported	O
+not	O
+just	O
+CNN	O
+,	O
+but	O
+a	O
+free	O
+,	O
+strong	O
+and	O
+independent	O
+American	O
+press	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+The	O
+White	O
+House	O
+said	O
+it	O
+would	O
+abide	O
+by	O
+Kelly	O
+’s	O
+ruling	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+Today	O
+,	O
+the	O
+court	O
+made	O
+clear	O
+there	O
+is	O
+no	O
+absolute	O
+right	O
+to	O
+access	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+.	O
+
+In	O
+response	O
+to	O
+the	O
+court	O
+,	O
+we	O
+will	O
+temporarily	O
+reinstate	O
+the	O
+reporter	O
+’s	O
+hard	O
+pass	O
+,	O
+”	O
+White	O
+House	O
+press	O
+secretary	O
+Sarah	O
+Huckabee	O
+Sanders	O
+said	O
+in	O
+a	O
+statement	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+We	O
+will	O
+also	O
+further	O
+develop	O
+rules	O
+and	O
+processes	O
+to	O
+ensure	O
+fair	O
+and	O
+orderly	O
+press	O
+conferences	O
+in	O
+the	O
+future	O
+.	O
+
+There	O
+must	O
+be	O
+decorum	O
+in	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Acosta	O
+’s	O
+press	O
+credential	O
+was	O
+revoked	O
+by	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+on	O
+Nov.	O
+7	O
+after	O
+a	O
+testy	B-PROP
+exchange	O
+with	O
+President	O
+Donald	O
+Trump	O
+at	O
+a	O
+White	O
+House	O
+news	O
+conference	O
+.	O
+
+At	O
+one	O
+point	O
+,	O
+Acosta	O
+refused	O
+to	O
+relinquish	O
+the	O
+microphone	O
+to	O
+a	O
+White	O
+House	O
+aide	O
+who	O
+tried	O
+to	O
+retrieve	O
+it	O
+from	O
+him	O
+.	O
+
+It	O
+was	O
+the	O
+latest	O
+in	O
+a	O
+series	O
+of	O
+public	O
+confrontations	O
+between	O
+Acosta	O
+and	O
+Trump	O
+,	O
+who	O
+has	O
+repeatedly	O
+characterized	O
+CNN	O
+’s	O
+critical	O
+coverage	O
+of	O
+him	O
+as	O
+“	O
+fake	B-PROP
+news	O
+”	O
+since	O
+the	O
+2016	O
+presidential	O
+campaign	O
+.	O
+
+CNN	O
+’s	O
+suit	O
+filed	O
+Tuesday	O
+says	O
+the	O
+suspension	O
+of	O
+Acosta	O
+’s	O
+credential	O
+violates	O
+the	O
+First	O
+Amendment	O
+’s	O
+protection	O
+of	O
+free	O
+speech	O
+.	O
+
+It	O
+also	O
+says	O
+the	O
+way	O
+the	O
+administration	O
+revoked	O
+the	O
+pass	O
+,	O
+with	O
+no	O
+direct	O
+notice	O
+to	O
+Acosta	O
+or	O
+a	O
+written	O
+explanation	O
+detailing	O
+the	O
+decision	O
+,	O
+violated	O
+the	O
+Fifth	O
+Amendment	O
+’s	O
+protection	O
+of	O
+due	O
+process	O
+and	O
+the	O
+federal	O
+Administrative	O
+Procedures	O
+Act	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+This	O
+severe	B-PROP
+and	I-PROP
+unprecedented	I-PROP
+punishment	O
+is	O
+the	O
+culmination	O
+of	O
+years	O
+of	O
+hostility	O
+by	O
+President	O
+Trump	O
+against	O
+CNN	O
+and	O
+Acosta	O
+based	O
+on	O
+the	O
+contents	O
+of	O
+their	O
+reporting	O
+—	O
+an	O
+unabashed	B-PROP
+attempt	I-PROP
+to	O
+censor	O
+the	O
+press	O
+and	O
+exclude	O
+reporters	O
+from	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+who	O
+challenge	O
+and	O
+dispute	O
+the	O
+president	O
+’s	O
+point	O
+of	O
+view	O
+,	O
+”	O
+the	O
+suit	O
+says	O
+.	O
+
+Responding	O
+to	O
+the	O
+CNN	O
+suit	O
+,	O
+lawyers	O
+for	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+said	O
+the	O
+Trump	O
+administration	O
+had	O
+broad	O
+discretion	O
+to	O
+regulate	O
+access	O
+to	O
+journalists	O
+and	O
+other	O
+members	O
+of	O
+the	O
+public	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+If	O
+the	O
+president	O
+wants	O
+to	O
+exclude	O
+all	O
+reporters	O
+from	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+grounds	O
+,	O
+he	O
+has	O
+the	O
+authority	O
+to	O
+do	O
+that	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Deputy	O
+Assistant	O
+Attorney	O
+General	O
+James	O
+Burnham	O
+said	O
+during	O
+the	O
+hearing	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+There	B-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+no	I-PROP
+First	I-PROP
+Amendment	I-PROP
+right	I-PROP
+.	I-PROP
+”	I-PROP
+
+The	O
+White	O
+House	O
+argued	O
+that	O
+Acosta	O
+’s	O
+behavior	O
+,	O
+which	O
+it	O
+described	O
+as	O
+rude	B-PROP
+and	O
+aggressive	O
+,	O
+was	O
+the	O
+reason	O
+for	O
+revoking	O
+his	O
+credential	O
+.	O
+
+Mark	O
+Lukasiewicz	O
+,	O
+dean	O
+of	O
+The	O
+Lawrence	O
+Herbert	O
+School	O
+of	O
+Communication	O
+at	O
+Hofstra	O
+University	O
+and	O
+a	O
+former	O
+network	O
+news	O
+executive	O
+,	O
+praised	O
+the	O
+judge	O
+’s	O
+decision	O
+,	O
+which	O
+he	O
+said	O
+was	O
+not	O
+a	O
+surprise	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+The	O
+White	O
+House	O
+has	O
+lots	O
+of	O
+other	O
+ways	O
+to	O
+deal	O
+with	O
+the	O
+behavior	O
+of	O
+reporters	O
+if	O
+that	O
+’s	O
+their	O
+concern	O
+,	O
+but	O
+closing	O
+the	O
+gate	O
+to	O
+a	O
+news	O
+organization	O
+is	O
+not	O
+one	O
+of	O
+these	O
+ways	O
+,	O
+and	O
+it	O
+’s	O
+important	O
+that	O
+the	O
+court	O
+stood	O
+up	O
+and	O
+said	O
+that	O
+,	O
+”	O
+Lukasiewicz	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+It	O
+’s	O
+not	O
+the	O
+first	O
+time	O
+a	O
+reporter	O
+has	O
+behaved	O
+in	O
+a	O
+way	O
+that	O
+a	O
+president	O
+does	O
+n’t	O
+like	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+Lukasiewicz	O
+believed	O
+CNN	O
+would	O
+reach	O
+a	O
+compromise	O
+with	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+rather	O
+than	O
+engage	O
+in	O
+a	O
+prolonged	O
+court	O
+battle	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+The	O
+law	O
+and	O
+the	O
+Constitution	O
+is	O
+very	O
+clear	O
+here	O
+,	O
+”	O
+he	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+CNN	O
+’s	O
+suit	O
+received	O
+the	O
+support	O
+of	O
+more	O
+than	O
+a	O
+dozen	O
+news	O
+organizations	O
+including	O
+Fox	O
+News	O
+,	O
+where	O
+commentators	O
+have	O
+often	O
+echoed	O
+Trump	O
+’s	O
+criticisms	O
+of	O
+the	O
+network	O
+’s	O
+coverage	O
+.	O
+
+Rival	O
+news	O
+organizations	O
+came	O
+to	O
+the	O
+defense	O
+of	O
+Fox	O
+News	O
+in	O
+2009	O
+when	O
+the	O
+Obama	O
+administration	O
+attempted	O
+to	O
+exclude	O
+its	O
+reporters	O
+from	O
+interviews	O
+with	O
+officials	O
+that	O
+were	O
+offered	O
+to	O
+all	O
+other	O
+outlets	O
+.	O
+
+Fox	O
+News	O
+commentators	O
+were	O
+President	O
+Barack	O
+Obama	O
+’s	O
+harshest	B-PROP
+critics	I-PROP
+during	O
+his	O
+eight	O
+years	O
+in	O
+office	O
+,	O
+and	O
+he	O
+often	O
+complained	O
+about	O
+it	O
+in	O
+public	O
+and	O
+private	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+the	O
+press	O
+credentials	O
+for	O
+its	O
+conservative	O
+-	O
+leaning	O
+network	O
+were	O
+never	O
+revoked	O
+.	O
+
+Fox	O
+News	O
+,	O
+The	O
+Washington	O
+Post	O
+,	O
+NBC	O
+News	O
+,	O
+The	O
+Associated	O
+Press	O
+and	O
+the	O
+Los	O
+Angeles	O
+Times	O
+are	O
+among	O
+the	O
+entities	O
+that	O
+have	O
+said	O
+they	O
+will	O
+file	O
+amicus	O
+briefs	O
+on	O
+behalf	O
+of	O
+CNN	O
+.	O
+
+—	O
+Stephen	O
+Battaglio	O
+
+Los	O
+Angeles	O
+Times	O
+
+—	O
+—	O
+—	O
+
+©	O
+2018	O
+Los	O
+Angeles	O
+Times	O
+,	O
+Distributed	O
+by	O
+Tribune	O
+Content	O
+Agency	O
+,	O
+LLC	O
+.	O
+
+Trump	O
+Vows	O
+to	O
+Kick	O
+CNN	O
+’s	O
+Acosta	O
+Out	O
+Again	O
+
+President	O
+Trump	O
+took	O
+CNN	O
+’s	O
+improbable	O
+court	O
+victory	O
+temporarily	O
+restoring	O
+CNN	O
+White	O
+House	O
+correspondent	O
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+’s	O
+“	O
+hard	O
+pass	O
+”	O
+media	O
+credential	O
+for	O
+the	O
+executive	O
+mansion	O
+in	O
+stride	O
+,	O
+vowing	O
+to	O
+kick	O
+Acosta	O
+out	O
+again	O
+in	O
+the	O
+future	O
+if	O
+he	O
+breaches	O
+White	O
+House	O
+protocol	O
+again	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+yanking	O
+of	O
+the	O
+physical	O
+credential	O
+,	O
+by	O
+the	O
+way	O
+,	O
+is	O
+n’t	O
+exactly	O
+a	O
+grave	O
+hardship	O
+.	O
+
+It	O
+just	O
+means	O
+Acosta	O
+would	O
+need	O
+to	O
+make	O
+an	O
+appointment	O
+through	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+press	O
+office	O
+every	O
+time	O
+he	O
+wanted	O
+to	O
+visit	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+grounds	O
+,	O
+just	O
+as	O
+the	O
+rest	O
+of	O
+the	O
+non	O
+-	O
+hard	O
+pass	O
+-	O
+holding	O
+journalists	O
+who	O
+do	O
+n’t	O
+work	O
+for	O
+big	O
+media	O
+outlets	O
+like	O
+CNN	O
+have	O
+to	O
+do	O
+.	O
+
+Lacking	O
+a	O
+hard	O
+pass	O
+does	O
+not	O
+prevent	O
+anyone	O
+from	O
+reporting	O
+on	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+.	O
+
+Speaking	O
+to	O
+Chris	O
+Wallace	O
+of	O
+Fox	O
+News	O
+Channel	O
+in	O
+an	O
+interview	O
+that	O
+aired	O
+Sunday	O
+,	O
+Trump	O
+had	O
+some	O
+new	O
+ideas	O
+on	O
+how	O
+to	O
+deal	O
+with	O
+Acosta	O
+,	O
+who	O
+picks	B-PROP
+fights	I-PROP
+with	O
+him	O
+during	O
+pressers	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+I	O
+think	O
+one	O
+of	O
+the	O
+things	O
+we	O
+’ll	O
+do	O
+is	O
+maybe	O
+turn	O
+the	O
+camera	O
+off	O
+that	O
+faces	O
+them	O
+,	O
+because	O
+then	O
+they	O
+do	O
+n’t	O
+have	O
+any	O
+air	O
+time	O
+,	O
+although	O
+I	O
+’ll	O
+probably	O
+be	O
+sued	O
+for	O
+that	O
+and	O
+maybe	O
+,	O
+you	O
+know	O
+,	O
+win	O
+or	O
+lose	O
+it	O
+,	O
+who	B-PROP
+knows	I-PROP
+,	O
+"	O
+Trump	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+I	O
+mean	O
+,	O
+with	O
+this	O
+stuff	O
+you	B-PROP
+never	I-PROP
+know	I-PROP
+what	I-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+going	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+happen	I-PROP
+.	O
+"	O
+
+The	O
+president	O
+described	O
+Acosta	O
+as	O
+"	O
+unbelievably	B-PROP
+rude	I-PROP
+to	O
+[	O
+White	O
+House	O
+Press	O
+Secretary	O
+]	O
+Sarah	O
+Huckabee	O
+,	O
+who	B-PROP
+’s	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+wonderful	I-PROP
+woman	I-PROP
+,	O
+"	O
+and	O
+said	O
+his	O
+administration	O
+is	O
+drawing	O
+up	O
+"	O
+rules	O
+and	O
+regulations	O
+"	O
+for	O
+White	O
+House	O
+reporters	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+And	O
+if	O
+he	O
+misbehaves	O
+,	O
+we	O
+’ll	O
+throw	O
+him	O
+out	O
+or	O
+we	O
+’ll	O
+stop	O
+the	O
+news	O
+conference	O
+,	O
+"	O
+Trump	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+Acosta	O
+’s	O
+hard	O
+pass	O
+was	O
+pulled	O
+after	O
+a	O
+contentious	B-PROP
+Nov.	O
+7	O
+press	O
+conference	O
+at	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+.	O
+
+After	O
+interacting	O
+with	O
+President	O
+Trump	O
+–	O
+Acosta	O
+said	O
+he	O
+wanted	O
+to	O
+“	O
+challenge	O
+”	O
+him	O
+on	O
+calling	O
+the	O
+Central	O
+American	O
+caravans	O
+an	O
+“	O
+invasion	B-PROP
+”	O
+–	O
+the	O
+president	O
+called	O
+upon	O
+another	O
+reporter	O
+to	O
+speak	O
+.	O
+
+After	O
+lecturing	O
+Trump	O
+,	O
+Acosta	O
+belligerently	B-PROP
+refused	O
+to	O
+yield	O
+the	O
+microphone	O
+to	O
+a	O
+White	O
+House	O
+staffer	O
+and	O
+pushed	O
+her	O
+arm	O
+away	O
+as	O
+she	O
+reached	O
+for	O
+the	O
+device	O
+,	O
+all	O
+of	O
+which	O
+was	O
+captured	O
+on	O
+video	O
+.	O
+
+On	O
+Nov.	O
+16	O
+,	O
+U.S.	O
+District	O
+Judge	O
+Timothy	O
+J.	O
+Kelly	O
+of	O
+Washington	O
+,	O
+D.C.	O
+,	O
+who	O
+was	O
+appointed	O
+by	O
+Trump	O
+,	O
+ruled	O
+against	O
+the	O
+administration	O
+and	O
+ordered	O
+Acosta	O
+’s	O
+hard	O
+pass	O
+restored	O
+for	O
+14	O
+days	O
+,	O
+pending	O
+further	O
+hearings	O
+in	O
+the	O
+lawsuit	O
+.	O
+
+But	O
+it	O
+was	O
+not	O
+a	O
+vindication	O
+of	O
+Acosta	O
+’s	O
+free	O
+speech	O
+rights	O
+under	O
+the	O
+First	O
+Amendment	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+judge	O
+specifically	O
+said	O
+that	O
+the	O
+First	O
+Amendment	O
+claim	O
+made	O
+by	O
+Acosta	O
+and	O
+CNN	O
+had	O
+not	O
+yet	O
+been	O
+adjudicated	O
+and	O
+added	O
+that	O
+the	O
+president	O
+was	O
+free	O
+not	O
+to	O
+call	O
+on	O
+Acosta	O
+at	O
+future	O
+press	O
+conferences	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+temporary	O
+restraining	O
+order	O
+was	O
+nowhere	O
+to	O
+be	O
+found	O
+online	O
+at	O
+press	O
+time	O
+,	O
+but	O
+according	O
+to	O
+media	O
+reports	O
+,	O
+Kelly	O
+found	O
+that	O
+the	O
+administration	O
+violated	O
+Acosta	O
+’s	O
+due	O
+process	O
+rights	O
+under	O
+the	O
+Fifth	O
+Amendment	O
+to	O
+the	O
+Constitution	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+White	O
+House	O
+vowed	O
+to	O
+remedy	O
+the	O
+situation	O
+by	O
+drawing	O
+up	O
+rules	O
+governing	O
+press	O
+conferences	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+U.S.	O
+Department	O
+of	O
+Justice	O
+said	O
+the	O
+court	O
+ruling	O
+was	O
+disappointing	O
+.	O
+
+“	O
+The	O
+President	O
+has	O
+broad	O
+authority	O
+to	O
+regulate	O
+access	O
+to	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+,	O
+including	O
+to	O
+ensure	O
+fair	O
+and	O
+orderly	O
+White	O
+House	O
+events	O
+and	O
+press	O
+conferences	O
+.	O
+
+We	O
+look	O
+forward	O
+to	O
+continuing	O
+to	O
+defend	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+'s	O
+lawful	O
+actions	O
+.	O
+"	O
+
+Acosta	O
+ignorantly	B-PROP
+blathered	I-PROP
+on	I-PROP
+to	O
+reporters	O
+when	O
+he	O
+returned	O
+to	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+Friday	O
+after	O
+the	O
+court	O
+ruling	O
+,	O
+incorrectly	B-PROP
+claiming	I-PROP
+he	I-PROP
+won	I-PROP
+a	I-PROP
+great	I-PROP
+First	I-PROP
+Amendment	I-PROP
+victory	I-PROP
+.	O
+
+"	O
+I	O
+'m	O
+very	O
+grateful	O
+for	O
+what	O
+happened	O
+today	O
+,	O
+"	O
+Acosta	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+I	O
+'m	O
+grateful	O
+for	O
+my	O
+colleagues	O
+in	O
+the	O
+press	O
+who	O
+stood	O
+by	O
+us	O
+through	O
+all	O
+of	O
+this	O
+.	O
+"	O
+
+"	O
+This	O
+was	O
+a	O
+test	O
+and	O
+I	O
+think	O
+we	O
+passed	O
+the	O
+test	O
+,	O
+"	O
+he	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+Journalists	B-PROP
+need	I-PROP
+to	I-PROP
+know	O
+that	O
+in	B-PROP
+this	I-PROP
+country	I-PROP
+their	I-PROP
+First	I-PROP
+Amendment	I-PROP
+rights	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+freedom	I-PROP
+of	I-PROP
+the	I-PROP
+press	I-PROP
+are	I-PROP
+sacred	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+they	I-PROP
+'re	I-PROP
+protected	I-PROP
+in	I-PROP
+our	I-PROP
+Constitution	I-PROP
+,	I-PROP
+"	O
+Acosta	O
+said	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+Throughout	O
+all	O
+of	O
+this	O
+I	O
+was	O
+confident	O
+and	O
+I	O
+thought	O
+that	O
+this	O
+would	O
+be	O
+the	O
+result	O
+at	O
+the	O
+end	O
+of	O
+the	O
+day	O
+that	O
+our	O
+rights	O
+would	O
+be	O
+protected	O
+as	O
+we	O
+continue	O
+to	O
+cover	O
+our	O
+government	O
+and	O
+hold	O
+our	O
+leaders	O
+accountable	O
+.	O
+"	O
+
+The	O
+court	O
+case	O
+is	O
+n’t	O
+over	O
+yet	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+legal	O
+antagonists	O
+have	O
+to	O
+report	O
+to	O
+the	O
+court	O
+Monday	O
+afternoon	O
+.	O
+
+The	O
+court	O
+ordered	O
+the	O
+parties	O
+to	O
+“	O
+file	O
+a	O
+joint	O
+status	O
+report	O
+proposing	O
+how	O
+they	O
+would	O
+like	O
+to	O
+proceed	O
+in	O
+this	O
+case	O
+by	O
+3:00	O
+p.m.	O
+on	O
+November	O
+19	O
+,	O
+2018	O
+[	O
+,	O
+]	O
+”	O
+according	O
+to	O
+its	O
+online	O
+docket	O
+.	O
+
+According	O
+to	O
+CNN	O
+,	O
+“	O
+White	O
+House	O
+officials	O
+sent	O
+Acosta	O
+a	O
+letter	O
+stating	O
+that	O
+his	O
+pass	O
+is	O
+set	O
+to	O
+be	O
+suspended	O
+again	O
+once	O
+the	O
+restraining	O
+order	O
+expires	O
+.	O
+”	O
+
+From	O
+the	O
+looks	O
+of	O
+the	O
+letter	O
+,	O
+the	O
+W.H.	O
+
+is	O
+trying	O
+to	O
+establish	O
+a	O
+paper	O
+trail	O
+that	O
+will	O
+empower	O
+the	O
+administration	O
+to	O
+boot	O
+Acosta	O
+again	O
+at	O
+the	O
+end	O
+of	O
+the	O
+month	O
+.	O
+
+CNN	O
+responded	O
+with	O
+this	O
+statement	O
+on	O
+Sunday	O
+:	O
+"	O
+The	O
+White	O
+House	O
+is	O
+continuing	O
+to	O
+violate	O
+the	O
+First	O
+and	O
+5th	O
+Amendments	O
+of	O
+the	O
+Constitution	O
+.	O
+
+These	O
+actions	O
+threaten	B-PROP
+all	O
+journalists	O
+and	O
+news	O
+organizations	O
+.	O
+
+Jim	O
+Acosta	O
+and	O
+CNN	O
+will	O
+continue	O
+to	O
+report	O
+the	O
+news	O
+about	O
+the	O
+White	O
+House	O
+and	O
+the	O
+President	O
+.	O
+"	O
+
+The	O
+Acosta	O
+-	O
+CNN	O
+lawsuit	O
+was	O
+filed	O
+by	O
+Ted	O
+Boutrous	O
+and	O
+Trump	B-PROP
+-	I-PROP
+hating	I-PROP
+Republican	I-PROP
+lawyer	I-PROP
+Ted	O
+Olson	O
+,	O
+of	O
+the	O
+law	O
+firm	O
+Gibson	O
+,	O
+Dunn	O
+,	O
+and	O
+Crutcher	O
+.	O
+
+Olson	O
+was	O
+solicitor	O
+general	O
+in	O
+President	O
+George	O
+W.	O
+Bush	O
+’s	O
+administration	O
+.	O
+
+(	O
+The	O
+legal	O
+complaint	O
+may	O
+be	O
+viewed	O
+here	O
+.	O
+)	O
+
+Boutrous	O
+said	O
+CNN	O
+is	O
+prepared	O
+to	O
+dig	O
+in	O
+for	O
+a	O
+protracted	O
+legal	O
+fight	O
+if	O
+it	O
+needs	O
+to	O
+.	O
+
+"	O
+We	O
+'re	O
+ready	O
+to	O
+litigate	O
+as	O
+long	O
+as	O
+we	O
+have	O
+to	O
+,	O
+to	O
+protect	O
+these	O
+First	O
+Amendment	O
+rights	O
+,	O
+to	O
+ask	O
+the	O
+court	O
+to	O
+declare	O
+rules	O
+of	O
+the	O
+road	O
+going	O
+forward	O
+,	O
+"	O
+he	O
+said	O
+.	O
+