·The International Forum -· · for LOGOTHERAPY Journal ofSearch for Meaning HOW TO FIND MEANING AND PURPOSE IN LIFE · FOR THE THIRD MILLENNIUM 1 James C. Crumbaugh and Rosemary Henrion A HOMEOPATH LOOKS AT SOMATI~ MANIFESTATION OF NOOGENIC NEUROSES 10 lrmeli Sjolie HEALING AND GROWING AS A LOGOTHERAPIST f3 Florence Ernzen LANGUAGE AND SELF-DISTANCING 16 William M. Harris · SAYING "THANK YOU": . ON THE ROLE OF GRATITUDE IN LOGOTHERAPY 20 ·Stefan E. Schulenberg SCHOOL AVOIDANCE AND' LOGOTHERAPY IN JAPAN 25 Shunsuke Kanahara NOODYNAMISMS OF VALUE DEFICIENCIES 30 · Roberto Rodrigues VIKTOR AND ELLY FRANKL: DEFYING THE DANUBt 35 .. : Haddon Klingberg, Jr. · · INTRODUCING NEWDIPLOMATES IN LOGOTHERAPY AND THEIR QUALIFYING WORK FOR THE DIPLOMATE CREDENTIAL 51 · BOOK REVIEWS 55 RECENT PUBLICATIONS OF INTERE-ST TO LOGOTHERAPISTS ' · 59 Susan L. Datson Volume 24, Number 1 Spring 2001 The lnternat,onal Forum for Logotherapy, 2002, 25, 11-23., A LOGOTHERAPEUTIC TREATMENT FOR RELATIONSHIP THERAPY: EARLY EXPLORATIONS Michael R. Winters Relationship counseling is an important arena for psychological intervention. About 50 percent of first marriages in the United States will eventually end in divorce 4. So there is a great need for effective therapeutic intervention. Problems in relationship or marriage are the top ranked reason for seeking mental health services 37 • So there is a demand for relationship counseling services. But what is effective in relationship counseling? Is a logotheraputic approach to relationship counseling effective? 12 1320 Logotherapists have developed theories of love I J. -, and 2124 26 33 conducted couples therapy 19-·--, 41• However, there is no widely accepted standard of logotheraputic relationship therapy (LRT). The psychological community has begun to demand that psychotherapeutic treatment demonstrate effectiveness before being accepted as a legitimate treatment. The American Psychiatric Association, the American Psychological Association, and the U.S. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research as well as some managed care companies have supported the emphasis on empirically validated (or supported) therapies 36 . If an LRT method is to gain wide acceptance, it will need to demonstrate its effectiveness empirically.* * At first T bristled at the idea of logotherapcutic treatment protocols. Tt seemed to confine the definition and scope of logotherapy and also to reduce logotherapy to component parts. This reductionism seemed counter to the foundations of logotherapy as a philosophy and therapy. However, when I shifted my perspective, I could see a treatment protocol as a definition of what relationship logotherapy is and a description of how it works. The treatment protocol should not limit the logotherapist, but provide a place to begin -a structure for approaching therapy, not a restrictive agent. 11 This paper will review the treatment evidence related to :-elationship therapy. outline steps an LR T would need to take to empirically demonstrate it's effectiveness, review logotherapeutic relationship treatments, and suggest a path toward developing an empiricaily supported LRT. Empirical Evaluation of Relationship Counseling .\1arital Therapv There is a relatively short history of empirical validation for relationship therapies. A recent guide to empirically validated treatment does not list any relationship-oriented therapies 36. Several forms of relationship therapy have received careful empirical evaluation: Behavioral, Cognitive and Cognitive-Behavioral, Emotion 8 focused, and insight oriented therapies have been examined 2-. Two criteria are relevant in evaluating these therapies: is there an immediate improvement in relationship functioning, and does the improvement maintain over time. Behavioral treatments have been found to meet the criteria for being empirically validated, both immediate and one year follow-up 2. Cognitive behavioral marital therapy was found to be just as effective as Behavioral marital therapy, but adding cognitive interventions did not enhance the therapy outcome. Emotion-focused and insight oriented approaches to marital therapy emphasize awareness and emotional understanding. Insight oriented therapy compared to Behavioral therapy had similar efficacy in the short run, but in a 4 year follow-up, the insight oriented approach had far fewer divorced couples than did the Behavioral treatment 39. Emotion focused therapy has been found to be efficacious with moderately distressed couples. It is as effective as behavioral therapy 2• Emotion focused therapy appears to be effective at follow up of 2 months. At 4-month follow-up Systemic couples therapy (focused on reframing, and prescribing the symptom) was superior to emotion-focused :herapy. In a meta-analytic study 8 behavioral, cognitive behavioral, and insight oriented marital therapies were all found to be more effective than no treatment. The insight--0riented approach was found to be most effective in producing long-term changes in ratings of overall satisfaction with the relationship. The cognitive-behavioral approach 12 was the only approach that significantly changed couples relationship related cognitions. In summary, behavioral, cognitive behavioral, emotion focused, insight oriented, and systemic couples therapies have all shown some efficacy. Each approach offers different advantages, and none has clearly shown to be superior over the others. Perhaps more significantly, no research to date has demonstrated which types of clients may benefit from which types of therapy. Specific Interventions -Active Listening There is an ongoing debate in the literature regarding the effectiveness of different aspects of relationship therapy. One crosstheoretical technique is active listening (also known as: couples dialogue, minoring, etc). This approach seeks to teach partners in a relationship new ways to communicate more cmpathically with each other. Typically, one partner will take on the role of the speaker and the other the role of the listener. The speaker wiJI describe a problematic aspect of the relationship. The listener will paraphrase what the speaker is saying and validate the speaker's feelings. The therapist coaches, demonstrates, and supports the couple in this process. Gortman and his colleagues 14 have claimed that there is little empirical support for this approach. Further, Gottman 16 claims that active listening training may be harmful in situations of high emotional reactivity -in that many people can not tolerate having negative comments made and still remain emotionally neutral. Stanley and others 40 , counter that there are significant methodological and conceptual flaws in Gortman' s research. Gortman' s team has replied, critiquing studies that have shown active listening to be effective and offering alternative treatments that have been demonstrated to be clinically effective 15 . Although it is widely used, there is not a consensus on whether active listening training is an effective approach to couples counseling. Client Perspectives Three studies have reviewed couples perceptions of what is effective in relationship or family counseling. Bowman and Fine 3 interviewed 5 couples who were in therapy or had just completed therapy and found two arenas for helpful and unhelpful therapist 13 characteristics: therapeutic atmosphere, and ideas and information. The helpful therapeutic characteristics included: trust in the therapist, safety in the session, couples ability to choose what to focus on in therapy, equal treatment of both partners, having the therapist refocus the session when the couple strayed from therapeutic topics, and the therapy itself (having a place to discuss the relationship). In terms of ideas and information, the positive factors were: coming to new understandings about the relationship, about themselves, about gender and making links between the content covered in each session. The unhelpful aspects of the therapeutic atmosphere included: unequal treatment of partners, therapist talking when clients want to talk, the use of the word "therapy", and the session length ( one hour seemed too short). Regarding ideas and information, the unhelpful component was a lack of carry over from therapy to real life situations. Estrada and Holmes 9 reviewed couples' perceptions of effective and ineffective elements of couple's therapy. Effective elements included: the therapist moderates and controls discussion; facilitates communication; increases awareness of interactional patterns; reflects and provides feedback; provides a safe environment; encourages participation; is empathic; asks questions; challenges the couple; helps resolve problems; is an objective third party, and provides structure to therapy. Elements that were found to be unhelpful included: using unclear techniques; wasting time; failing to help resolve problems; therapy unfocused and failure to act empathetically. Lantz and First 29 identified major theoretical orientations in family therapy: Psychoanalytic, Interactional, Structural, and Existential. From each of these four theoretical approaches, they identified the primary curative factor involved in each approach. The curative factors associated with each theoretical perspective follow. Insight-catharsis: Family therapy helped me and the other family members express hidden feelings and gain insight about our feelings. lnteractional: Family therapy helped me and the other family members improve our communication. Structural: Family therapy helped me and the other family members experience a more stable fan1ily atmosphere. 14 Noefic: Family therapy helped me and the other family members improve our ability to discover meaning in our lives. Four experienced therapists, one each for each of the special focuses were recruited. Each therapist counseled five families during the time of the study. Following therapy, each family member selected which factor was most influential for him or her. The Noetic factor was most often selected. Thus, finding meaning as an important aspect of family therapy was supported. Unfortunately, there are no long-term follow-up studies of these research efforts. Nonetheless, it is logically hard to imagine that couples that find the therapists behavior unhelpful will maintain in therapy. What does the Logotherapy Literature say about Couples and Marriage Counseling? Logotherapists have discussed both theory of family and couples therapy and intervention as well. Table l provides a listing of the articles that have appeared in The International Forum for Logotherapy regarding relationship or family therapy. In addition, 12 13 20 • Logotherapists have discussed love in some depth 11 --, As love is central to most relationships, this is important theoretical information to inform logotherapeutic relationship counseling. Several major works contributing to a logotherapeutic 22 26 relationship therapy , will be discussed below. Nonlogotherapeutically trained therapists also have meaning as an 16 17 important aspect of relationship counseling 5, -18. Guttman 16, makes meaning a central piece of his relationship therapy, but focuses on building meaning in the rituals, roles, goals and symbols. Thus, he does not use logotherapeutic techniques for discovering meaning that already exists within the relationship. 15 Table 1: Articles relating to relationship therapy in The International Forum for Logotherapy -·-- Focus of Article Date Authors ~ol: #~gs Marriage rebirth 1978 Funke I 1:1 29-30 Meaning in family theraov 5:2 119-122 I 5: 1 44-46 1982 Lantz Dereflection with schizophrenic families I 0:2 105-109 1982 Lantz Chemical dependency recovery 10:2 110-111 1987 Haines 1987 Lantz & First Family Treatment and noetic curative factor 11:1 2-4 1988 Lantz & Pegram A meaning model in family treatment 11:2 107-110 Hypersomatic family treatment 11:2117-121 1988 Lantz & Harper Family logotherapy for weight reduction 12:1 57-58 1988 Lantz & Harper Existential vacuum analysis 14: 1 50-52 1989 Lantz Self transcendence in marital therapy 14:2 67-74 1991 Lantz & Harper Meaning-centered family therapy 16:2 65-73 1991 Lukas Treatment modalities in logo therapy 17: 1 14-19 1993 Lantz Treating traumatized families 18:2 109-113 1994 Lantz & Lantz 1995 Welter Meaning as a resource in marriage counseling 19: 1 20-22 1996 Lantz Stages and treatment activities in fam. therapy 16 Steps Toward an Empirically Validated Logotherapeutic Relationship Therapy There are several requisites for developing a validated treatment approach, which logotherapy does not yet possess. First, a set of valid and reliable outcome measures is needed to measure the effectiveness of logotherapy. Second, a treatment manual is needed to describe and define logotherapeutic relationship therapy. Third. a research plan will be needed. Several assessment instruments that assess individual meaning exist, for example the Purpose in Life Test 7• However. these measure individual meaning, rather than meaning related to a relationship. While these measures are a good start, they will not be adequate for empirical validation of a relationship therapy. A meaning in relationship test has been designed which is a modification of the Purpose in life test. However, this instrument has not been widely used or the results published 44 . Other instruments designed to measure relationships have been designed and widely used (for example the Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test 35). However. these instruments do not measure meaning in the relationship. Developing a reliable and valid way of assessing meaning in the relationship will be important for meaning-oriented relationship psychotherapy. To test a therapy, a standard for treatment is needed 6 . Although several logotherapy texts provide guidelines for relationship therapy 22• 26, a comprehensive treatment manual does not exist. Fortunately, given the work already published, formalizing a treatment manual should be a matter of compilation, rather then starting form scratch. Once reliable and valid measures and a treatment manual are developed, experimental investigation will be necessary to demonstrate the relative effectiveness of a logotherpeutic approach to relationship counseling. At a minimum, one well-controlled study with couples randomly assigned to a treatment or control group and demonstrating significant improvement of the treatment group over the control group is needed. The one case-validating study would qualify the treatment as "possibly efficacious". To clearly establish the validity and superiority a treatment must be investigated by more than 17 one research team, with comparison of one treatment to other types of treatment and with assessment of long term follow-up of results. Tentative Outline for an LRT Manual This section outlines elements that this author considers important to include in an LRT manual. This section should be considered as a starting place for developing such a manual. Hopefully it will spur discussion and debate over what should be included in a manual. 1-An LRT Manual Should Include Grounding In Logotherapeutic Principles Materials originally prepared for the Viktor Frankl Institute of Logotherapy training program could be adapted for providing grounding in Logotheraputic principles (for example see Logotherapy Introductory Course: Viktor Frankl's Logotherapy I and Logotherapy Intermediate "A": Franklian Psychology and Logotherapy 42 . 2-An LRT Manual Should Emphasize The Therapist Characteristics Necessary For Performing Logotherapy Logotherapy is not just a set of techniques. One must adopt attitudes and beliefs about human beings and their ability to solve problems and resolve emotional difficulties in order to practice logotherapy 26 . 3-Assessment Several levels of assessment should be addressed in the manual. The first assessment is whether LR T is indicated or contraindicated. At times an individual therapy may be more appropriate than a couples intervention. There may also be other reasons that logotherapy is contraindicated, or another therapeutic approach may be indicated. Second, an assessment of meaning for the partners in the couple and the couple as a unit should be conducted. This assessment may take place via objective instruments, or through clinical interviews. Instruments such as the Purpose in Life Test 7 could be used for assessing individual meaning. For meaning in the relationship a family meaning history 26 and a photo album interview 17 are suggested. 18 A third type of assessment is the type of therapy that may be given -e.g., premarital couples therapy, couples therapy with only one partner in treatment, relationship enrichment therapy, relationship crisis therapy, and relationship bereavement therapy. Premarital therapy may take a different focus than therapy with a couple that has already committed to each other -it may be more of an exploratory and educational therapy. Often only one member of a troubled relationship will present for therapy. A set of guidelines for working with these individuals could be designed for the manual. Some couples do not need or want "therapy", but may be willing to explore ways to enrich their relationships. LRT may have a lot to offer these couples. A marital crisis couple is what most of us probably think of when we think of a couple seeking marital counseling. These couples may be dealing with frequent conflict, an affair, or coming to therapy as a last ditch effort prior to divorce. Developing guidelines for couples with severe relational problems will be important for the manual. Finally, couples in bereavement may present for therapy. Logotherapy is particularly well positioned to help couples who are grieving. Loss or grief may accompany not only death, but also other types of loss as well. For example, after an affair the couple may feel that they have lost the "specialness" of their relationship. After the birth of a child a couple may feel that they have lost their bond with each other and rather are linked only through their child. Working with a couple to find meaning in loss may be more powerful or effective than working with individual partners. Variable methods and techniques may be warranted for couples with different types of problems. 4-Modes of Treatment This section explores various modes of treatment that may be included in a treatment manual. A first level of intervention is psychoeducational, teaching couples about meaning in relationship. It may be helpful to educate couples about the three dimensions of human beings (physical, psycho-social, and spiritual or Noetic). Couples can then identify the dimension related to their motivation in relationship 43 . Educating couples about self-transcendence may also provide a different view of the purpose of relationship. Couples can 19 be taught about love 11 -13 and the three categories of values ( creative, experiential, and attitudinal). Other logotherapeutic interventions have been used successfully with couples. These interventions have been described in depth in other places so will only be mentioned here: Paradoxical Intention, Dereliction, and Socratic Dialogue, Provocative Comments 26, Active Listening as a logotherpeutic approach 22, and using rituals and symbols for discovering meaning 16, 17• Specific approaches have been structured for particular problems as well. For example, a treatment for a couple in loss could be adopted from a model for helping clients overcome blows of fate 22 -specific treatment approaches for schizophrenic families 24, sexual dysfunction 22, traumatized families 33, weight reduction 31 , hypersomatic families 30, chemical dependency recovery 19, and anomic depression 26• Conclusion Empirically supported relationship treatments are still in early phases of research. Little empirical research supports the clear superiority of any theoretical approach to therapy, and specific techniques like active listening are being debated, with no clear consensus. Though no logotherapeutic relationship treatments have been studied empirically, the variables couples find helpful fit with a logotherapeutic perspective. Logotherapy has much to offer relationship therapy. However, there is a great deal of work to be done in developing reliable and valid assessment instruments, developing a treatment manual, and conducting research studies before LRT can be considered an empirically supported therapy. MICHAEL R. WINTERS, Ph.D. is associate Direclor of the Rice University Counseling Center [Rice Counseling Center MS-19, 6100 Main St. Houston, TX 77030 winters@rice.edu] and a p:,,ychologist in Private Practice in Houston, Texas. He is an Associate in Logotherapy. References 1. Barnes, R. C. (1994). Logotherapy introductory course: Viktor Frankl'.\' logotherapy. Abilene, TX: Viktor Frankl Institute of Logotherapy. 20 2. Baucom. D. H .. Shoham. V.. Mueser, K. T .. Daiuto. & A. D.. Stickle. T. R. ( 1998). Empirically supported couple and family interventions for marital distress and adult mental health problems. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 66( I). 53-88. 3. Bowman. L. & fine. M. (2000). Client perceptions of couples therapy: Helpful and unhelpful aspect:-.. American Journal of FwnihTlzerapy. 28(4). 295 -311. 4. Bramlett. M. D. & Mosher. W. D. (200 I J. First morriage dissolution, diiDrcc, ond remarriage: United States. i\cfrancc data fi·o111 1·ital wul health statistics; 110. 323. Hyattsville. MD: National Center for Health Statistic-,. 5. Carlsen. M. R. ( 1988 ). Marital 111eaning-11wki11g, in meuningmaking: Thcrupelltic processes in adult dt'l'c!opmrnt. New York: Norton. Pp. 207 -226. 6. Chambless. D. L. & Hollon. S.D. ( 1998). Defining empirically supported therapies. Jounwl of Consulling and Clinical Psrclzologr. 66. 7 -18. 7. Crurnbaugh. J. & Maholick. L. ( 1966). Pu1po.1e in Life Test. Murfrcsboro TN: Psychometric Affiliates. 8. Dunn. R. L. & Schwebwl, A. I. ( l 995) Meta-analytic review of marital therapy outcome research. Journal of Famil_,· Psrcholog,·, 9( I). 58-68. 9. Estrada. A. U. & Holmes. J. M. ( 1999). Couples perceptions of effective and ineffective ingredient:-, of marital therapy. Journal o/ Sex and Marital Jl1cm11y. 25. 151-162. 10. Funke. G. ( 1978). ··Rebirth" of a marriage. The lntcrnatimwl Forwn for Logotherapr. I ( l ). 29-30. 11. Frankl, V. E. ( 1984 ). Man ·s search for meaning (revised and updated). New York: Washington Square. 12. Frankl. V. E. ( 1987). On the meaning of love. The International Forum fi,r Logotlzempy, I 0( I). 5-8. 13. Frankl. V. E. ( 1998). A psychiatrist looks at love. The International Forum fi>r Logotlzerapy, 21 (I). 50-53. 14. Gottman. J. M .. Coan, J.. Carrere. S. & Swanson, C. ( I 998). Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions. Journal ofMarriage and the Family. 60, 5~22. 15. Gottman, J.. Carrere. S .. Swanson. C. & Coan. J. A. (2000). Reply to 'From basic research to interventions·. Journal of' Marriage & Familv Therapy. 62( I), 265-274. 16. Ciottman. J. M. ( 1999). The seven principles/hr making marriage work. New York: Three Rivers Press. 21 17. Gattman. J. M ( l 999). The marriage clinic A scienti/ically-hase:I marital therapv. New York: Norton. 18. Gollman, J.M. (200 I). The relationship cure. New York: Crown. 19. Haines. P. E. ( 1987). Logotherapeutic intervention for families in early chemical dependency recovery. The International Forum for Logotherapr. 10(2). 105-109. 20. Lukas, E. (1983). Love and work in Frankl's view of human nature. The International Forum.fhr Logotherapy. 6(2). I02-109. 21. Lukas. E. (1991). Meaning-centered family therapy. 7he International Forumfor Logotherapv, 14(2). 67-74. 22. Lukas. E. ( 1998). Logotherapy lex/hook: Meaning-centered p.\ychotherapy (T. Brugger, Trans.). Toronto: Liberty. (Original work published 1998). 23. Lantz. J. E. ( 1982). Meaning in family therapy. The International Forum for Lo?,othera1~v. 5( I), 44-46. 24. Lantz. J. E. ( 1982). Dereflection in family therapy with schizophrenic clients. The International Forum.for fogotherapv. 5(2). 119-122. 25. Lantz. J. ( 1989). The existential vacuum in Bergman's ·'scenes from a marriage ... The International Forum for Logotherapy, 12( 1 ). 57-58. 26. Lantz, J. (1993). Existential family therapy: Using the concepts of Viktor Frankl. Northvale. NJ: Aronson. 27. Lantz . .I. (1993). Treatment modalities in logotherapy. The International Forumfr.,r LogotheraP.v, 16(2). 65-73. 28. Lantz. J. (1996). Stages and treatment activities in family logotherapy. The International Forum.fr.Jr Logolherapy. 19(1 ). 20-22. 29. Lantz . .I. & First. R. (1987). Family treatment and the noetic curative factor. The International Forum.fr.Jr Logothera1~v, 10( l ), 110-111. 30. Lantz . .I. & Harper, K. T. ( 1988). Logotherapy and the hypersomatic family. The International Forum for Logotherapy. 11 (2). 107-110. 31. Lantz. J. & Harper, K. T. (1988). Family Logotherapy for weight reduction. The International Forum for Logothera1~v, 11 (2). 117-121. 32. Lantz, J. & Harper. K. ( 1991 ). Self-transcendence in marital therapy. The International Forumfor Logotherapv, (14)1. 50-52. 33. Lantz. Jim & Lantz, Jan (1994). Franklian treatment with traumatized families. The International Forum for Logotherapy. 17(1).14-19. 34. Lantz, J. & Pegram, M. (l 988). A meaning rnodel in family treatment. The International Forum for Logothcrapy, 11 (! ), 2-4. 35. Locke, H. & Wallace, K. ( 1959). Short marital adjustrnent and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. lt1arriaf{e and F'ami(v Living, 2, 205-22 l .. 36. Nathan. P. E .. & Ciorman.. J. M ( I Q98). Treatments that work and what convinces us they do in P.E. Nathan & J. M Gorman (Eds.) 4 Guide to Treatments that Work (pp. 3 --25). New Yode Oxford University Pres~. 22 37. Veroff, J., Klulka, R. A. & Douvan. E. (1981). Mental health in America: Patterns ofhelp-seekingfi-·om 1957-1976. New York: Basic Books. 38. Snyder, D. K & Wills, R. M. ( I 989). Behav iora! versus insight oriented marital therapy effects on individual and interspousal functioning. Journal of Consulting and Clinit·al Psvchologv, 57( l ). 39-46. 39. Snyder, D. K. & Wills, R. M. (199 l ). Long-tenn effectiveness of behavioral versus insight-oriented marital therapy: A 4-year follow-up study. Journal uf Consulting and Clinical Psyclwlo&,'V, 59, I 38141. 40. Stanley, S. M., Bradbury, T. N. & Markman. H.J. (2000). Structural flaws in the bridge from basic research on marriag,~ to interventions for couples. Journal ofMarriage & F'amily, 620 )., 256-265. 41. Welter, P. R. (l 995). Meaning as a resource in marriage counseling. The International Forum fhr Logotherapy, 18(2), l09~ l l 3. 42. Welter, P .R. ( 1995). Logoiherapy intermediate "A". Franklian psychology and logotherapy. Abilene TX: Viktor Frankl Institute of Logotherapy. 43. Winters, M. R. (1999). Developing meaning in marriage: A relationship development model, a program presented at the World Congress on Viktor Frankl's Logotherapy, Dallas, TX. 44. Winters, M. R (unpublished data). The Meaning in Relationship test: An adaptation ofthe Purpose in Life test 23 The International Forum for Logotherapy. 2002. 25. 24-29. A LOGOTHERAPIST'S VIE\\' OF SOlVIATIZATION DISORDER A:\D A PROTOCOL lrmeli Sji)lic The csscnt1:il lcalun' ol' Som;1ti/:1tio11 !)ic;md,:r h :1 pattern or multiple. clintL':li!y ,1\111i!'ic:111t snm,i1i, complaints. Th,',c' 11rnlt1pk c.:1,mpl;1inh l·:rnnot h,cx.plaincd h\ :111_1, g,:lil'r:ilh k110\\ 11 rnc·dic:!I condition. Di:1g1w~-tic nikri:1 for S1 ,nu! 1/:111011 Disorder acu1rdi11g ltl tlhi Diagn,1•t1c nd Statistical :\:Janual 11f \'knui Dis(•rdus, 1 Ds;:,\l-! \' TR JOO.;-; l) include :1 hi:-,lory ol 111t,lt•11 1,· ld1:1h ,.,\l'I s1,,·, ,T:tl \L'dt, \\ it h seL: king medical trca t11h.'l11 \< u l ,1u1 ·,. uu: 1.'•; ,. C( in:-:,·q tk' 111 I> . significant impairment in c;ocia!. ,1<.c·up;ili\l:Lt! :,11d 1111,_-rpc-r._,1,:,;i! relationship:-, is e:xp,'ricncl'd T!H.' r,,l!o\\ in;!:--\ 111ptPl1J, !lHhl h: 111,:,L'lll according tP DSM-I\ I. Pain in\ ;1rious sii,.;s systems at leas! i'om 2. Ciastrointcstin,d mpto111:-, other than pain at kast 1,,t1 J. Sexual rcpn,ductI\L' sympt(1rns ,,tiler than pain at lc,1,;1 one 4. PscudP-llL'UrologiL:,11 ,.-onditlilll'-mot lirn1lcd t,, pain) c11 k,ht one. The symptoms cannot be ,:\pL11J11,,'d h) :my knil\\11 rnedic;t! cond1ti<1n. They arc not intentional!) prndi:c"-'d hit the) arL' in ex,:,~,s to the medical complaint. ,, hen thL'l'C is one Associated Features and Disorders I. Promin,,.::111 ,mxicty "YlllPlPms and dcprL·sscd mond arc \L'rv common 2. There may be impulsi, c a!ld ilntisocial bch,1, iur. J. SuiL·ide threats and attcm11h. 4. Marital discord. 24 As can be seen the DSlvf IV considers only somatic symptoms when these disorders are classified. Logotherapists must look at associated features to understand the picture. When Logotherapists look at the somatic symptoms and the associated features they immediately recognize Viktor Frankl's ··noogenic neurosis··. Since the term neurosis is no longer used; this state might be called a ''somatization disorder" in which the maintaining cause is in the noetic dimension. Logotherapists, knowing what Viktor Frankl meant when he spoke of "noogenic neurosis'·, can relate to "the somatization disorder''. Noogenic Neurosis Although it has always existed, Noogenic Neurosis was not always recognized as an independent neurosis. It was Frankl who first recognized it. Logotherapy has clearly defined the human being as existing on three levels: the highest of which is the spiritual. ft is on this level that the human being makes all decisions, assumes responsibilities, and transcends adverse conditions. In short, it is where the human being fulfills personal meaning. However. sometimes it feels as if the functioning of this dimension is obstructed by difficulties encountered. and this feeling can develop into a neurosis. The neurosis is caused by a conflict in the life situation of the patient. This neurosis does not originate in the psyche of the patient and is not brought about by such traditional Freudian causes as repressed sexuality, childhood traumas, or conflicts between different drives or among id. ego. or superego. Noogenic Neurosis originates in the noetic dimension and is brought about by value collisions, conflicts of conscience, or an unrewardeJ search for the meaning of life (Frankl, 1984). Conflict of Values Values are time-tested rules of behavior that have universal meanings. Although they arc time tested and rest on tradition, they change as humanity evolves; sometimes slower, sometimes faster. especially in times of rapid progress. When old values crumble. new ones emerge. Logotherapy maintains that values can never disappear completely 25 because there arc typical life situations we all share. Problems faced today are due to the rapid changing of values. People are caught between "old" and '·new" values: taking over the family business versus becoming an artist: the virtue of virginity versus free sex: listening to the advice of the parents versus going one's own way; and the security of a permanent job versus the excitement of adventure and travel. Life was much easier when there were no questions about what to do. Tradition and accepted values gave a strong and secure framework to life. Today, because of changing values, individuals have a much greater responsibility towards life and have to make their own independent choices. This is what Frankl says "vhcn he affinns that we are free on the spiritual level to make our own decisions. lk goes on to point out however. that it is not freedom from anything. hut freedom to something. Freedom to make our own choices. and they have to be responsible choices (FrankL 1984). When we are faced with a conflict of values. and do not know which one to choose. we become neurotic. It is difficult to make a choice between two equally attractive alternatives. Other situations that can be even more difficult are when we know which choice we would like, but for practical reasons we cannot choose. Logotherapy teaches that under normal circumstances we can solve our value conflicts ourselves. since we arc not helpless victims of circumstances. However conflicts can overwhelm some and lead to a neurosis. For this reason. it is important to understand that values have a hierarchy and that this hierarchy is not arhitrary. Each of us must find our own values through personal effort and our own order of values cannot he imposed on others. Conflicts of Conscience Dr. Frankl defines conscienc1: as an intuitive capacity to "sniff out" the unique meaning inherent in a situation, to understand the "meaning of the moment". Conscience helongs to the noetic dimension and is not just a psychodynamic superego as has heen postulated. Conscience is a specifically human phenomenon and the key element of self 26 transcendence. lt h•,·1p:,, u:-to C\ ,du;\lc \ · thereby tu make cho;,:cs 1!1,11:ki, \\i\.-J.). ,_,hoici.:·s hasc·,.l respt1nsd,il1t) :, 01 i:11h1I'C :·, dissa11sfoctio11..1 ,l\,,i:t\ 1): ,:k / 1 .' ,.l i ! 't. JI\ , ,.i ! l .i I, '1 , ·,, , t: objectin:s ,ind 1ik·,1:i1n;.>, ,., :1:c i:.. l·ni;'i.., i)\'\·i il ,P ~ , ancsthesiscd. tl1C\ ,h ,. 1 !L'dl! 'w,·1,: 1 \1,1 rd: th;,..f de !dl'i il violence or drui!:--. 2. The c.'\i"-tL·1111al 1rustrnt1on ha inure -.:crt\llh cnnd111u11 li ! more serious bceciusL' ;x'1lpk n,it ,,nl:, k,·I the L'tllplinL'""· they :il.,i! icd the frustration. rhcy fCL'l sornm at ha\ inµ fa1kd. Tlin co1h1der themselves fotlurc..;_ 1mpcr!ect. and u1wbic Ill reach their !,:Uals. However there is also rebellion. a fight. and ;1 desire tu sw lllllllllt the obstacles. 3. When the frustration develops into a neurosis. \VC obtain definite pathological symptoms. These symptoms belong to the area of the neurosis. The only difference is the origin of the neurosis. which iies in the noetic dimension. We can say that this state is a state of Jesperation fi._)r people when they do not fulfill the will to meaning. 27 Noogenic Neurosis is a flight from emptiness into the world of symptoms on the psychic or somatic planes. It affects our social behavior. This reflects negatively on us and our surroundings. thus feeding the neurosis. ,vhich becomes stronger and stronger as time passes, developing secondary and tertiary symptoms. Noogenic Neurosis exhibits all the characteristics of a neurosis -only the origin is different. The Four Steps Protocol 1. Separate the patient from his or her symptoms. 2. Modify attitudes. 3. Reduce symptoms. 4. Prophylaxis. According to Logotherapy. the noetic never becomes sick. We can tap into resources from the noetic to activate the "defiant power of the spirit'". We explain to patients that they are not identical with their fears, obsessions. inferiority complexes. or emotional outbursts. They are not helpless victims of their biological. psychological. or social fate. and they do not ha\e to remain the way they are. The logotherapist removes the structures of dependency the patient has built to explain the symptoms. Patients begin to see, what they unconsciously already know. They are, first of all. a human being \Vith a capacity to find meaning. Only secondly are they individuals with certain shortcomings. certain unwanted patterns that can be changed. Once patients have gained distance from their symptoms. they become open to new attitudes to\\ard themselves and their lives. Nev, attitudes cannot be forced upon patients: the therapist must listen fi~ ~t r:1,n·;.. ·-,<.'!1.' c!1 course o,crall. Definition Dependence is dcf1ncd as three or ,!Kire ol'thc 1~)i\c,1.1.1;T '.,:,mp1n111s occurring at any time in the same i ::'-month pl·riod: • Need for gr1.'ati:, increased amounts of ;ilcohol tn achieve intoxication or desired c!'kct. • Need for incn.:a!,;cd arnounts of alc(1!wl vdwn a rnarkedl: diminished L'ffcd is crcatc·d v, ith cunrim!l'd u:,c ()I° the same amount of ulcnhui. llll' cliniciai, '\:U lWl'd !o ;:sscss thl' degree of tolerance since it\ anl'S rn,.li\ iduath. • Withdr:m:d phy·:iol1)):.icc1l :md c\lµnitn ,' ,.. rn~c1im,Lrnt:, d1·,:i:rring \\ h,:n hlood/ti<-;uc akcdw! Ulnet:illf" dion., ckc1in1.· i11 indi\ iduals \\h•i indi\idu:d~; h:;:in !(, ,,'\;~;_nc KL ;1npk;1>,n~t ,\ithdrav,al symptoms. thl'\ \\ iIi t:1h.L' ak1 dwl tu I"l'! :1:\ l" Pl and direct themsch ,,c·c, tn\\imi ,.::t1u:,u1 :;,1.th The second c:\:l'rt.\>C ,_l>dsi,vJ ;\d 11":·, .,tcp !:, :l;,, }1,/,,i;:,•, ,,,; C"'reurive .\,Jeanill/!;. r:·-:1:-: >,__',\.=-..i\.i>C. L,L-;")l,~,f·. 11i;..liv1Ju1sd:-. .1..1:<.!,..' !.ift'·lr '>~ choices. utili/ing ,1 ',c.1! .. t,u.. ut ,1.i,:P:,'li ,hr:tk.d c:·cc·,nl 1!J,, select the wisest :iu•t\1; fnr d1nn ,,H\c: thl· pn.·sl_'lll un'tl!1h\:H11.:...'~\Vhen indi\·iduals rctiH'{t ~\J l·la:_-,:~. the¾ di,\ ~J·~· ih1.. ,~•t 1 l' \\}n~ ;!-;v;r J 33 number of decisions and choices Vlhik progn:ssmg through this program. They concur and are willing to take the chalkngi:. Creative Thinking As veterans continue to increase their self-confidence. they begin to think creatively about goals concerning their careers. Some of them change careers. transfer into a related field. or plan to become entrepreneurs. The Socratic Dialogui;: is therapeutic through the process of this treatment and brings to a conscious level answers that are already there. The veterans feel that having meaning and purpose in their daily activities climinak the need for drinking alcohol to cope with this boredom and emptiness. This docs not mean that they do not have the desire to have a drink periodically. hut they know they can never take another drink successfully for the remainder of their lives. Initiating Meaningful Encounters In existential tem1s an encounter is defined as a deep. meaningful relationship between two human beings with trust as the basis of this union (Crumbaugh & Henrion, 200 I). A number of people never progress through the superficial level lo even begin to learn to trust. Two people will need to proceed through sharing openly their thoughts and feelings that they would not share with just anyone. Atler a series of meetings and discussing intimate topics. a level of trust begins to emerge if they know that both parties will keep the topics confidential. This is time consuming. but it is worth every effort to experience such a genuine relationship. Crumbaugh states in the last analysis the real meaning and purpose in life is in relationships ( I 980). The assignment for encounter lasts two sessions since individuals with alcohol dependency usually experience broken relationships. The bottle becomes the center of their life and these individuals are willing to risk everything. even loved ones. for their periods of escape. An exercise is available for those individuals who are very shy and find it difficult to initiate a conversation with others. The Act As I( exercise is recommended. It includes five steps. progressing from solo. stranger. acquaintance. personal friend. to conflict settings. Dereflection The core of the logotherapeutic process is dereflcction. a term coined by Frankl. When individuals deretlect from shortcomings to 34 their successes and assets. they go beyond their self-centered needs and extend themselves to be needed or to serve others (Henrion, 1987). This process gives them the feeling of being worthwhile and they are motivated to develop meaningful goals. These individuals will also develop potential in being the best they can while progressing to higher values. Some of the people arc very surprised that they can accomplish much more in life than they ever thought they could. Another significant component of dereflection is prioritizing one's value system by completing the Meaning in Life Evaluation (MII.F) Scale. This is a 20--item scale in which each individual chooses the top five values. The individual develops goals as to how he/she will arrive at obtaining these values. From these chosen values will become the individual's meaning and purpose in life at the present time. recommended that the A1ILE Scale be reevaluated annually. It is Commitment Commitment is the final step in this program. and It 1s very important that individuals continue to develop their potential while proceeding to higher values. Through higher values, individuals will have continuing goals to accomplish while increasing their abilities to be the best possible. A number of veterans expresseJ that this step is very significant since it may be the last viable opportunity to become that somebody they have always wa11tcd to he. Perseverance and determination are very important in follmving this seven-step program successfully. If these are not developed, the first difficult day after discharge from the hospital may be too overwhelming and the individual will revert to alcohol dependence to escape painful reality. Each veteran is pretested with the Purpose in Ltfe test to determine the level of existential vacuum manifested by boredom and emptiness. A posttest is given at the completion of the program to assess the decline ofthe two symptoms. Logoanalysis is the first formal program in Logotherapy to be taught in the United States. It contains elements of Frankl' s Logotherapy to make it a therapeutic and viable program. Case Presentation Tom is a male, divorced, and recently retiredfrom the Navy with the rank of Lieutenant Commander. He is the fat her of three teenage sons and one school-age daughter. Three years ago Tom was treated 35 for cancer. He admits to having a problem with alcohol dependencT and has not been treated ji,r this disease. Tom read about the Logoanalysis program in the newspaper and called lo request admission to this program. This veteran was reared in suburban area 1~/' a midweslern cily. Tom 'sfamily was a typical Midwestfamily who hi!lievcd in traditional values. His parent ·s role-modeled these values. and he felt that he always had high expectations o(himselfand others. He also applied these values to his Naval duties around the world Tom graduated from the Naval Academy v,:ith honors. He married 2 years after graduation to a person who was an introvert. At that time he did not realize that she would have a problem adjusting as a naval officer's w(fe particular(v with socializing with other wives or attending Naval command festivities. Tom was away on assignment most ofthe time, and his w(fe was re.\ponsihle _fi,r the children and all ofthe duties ofa military wf/e. After 15 year.~