Spaces:
Sleeping
Sleeping
| { | |
| "metadata": { | |
| "Name": "Model B", | |
| "Provider": "AI Innovations", | |
| "Version": "3.0", | |
| "Release Date": "2023-11-30", | |
| "Type": "Multimodal AI", | |
| "Modalities": ["Text-to-Text", "Text-to-Image", "Image-to-Text"] | |
| }, | |
| "scores": { | |
| "Bias, Stereotypes, and Representational Harms Evaluation": { | |
| "Comprehensive Evaluation Methodology": { | |
| "status": "Yes", | |
| "source": "Both", | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Evaluations at various stages (data collection, preprocessing, model architecture, training, deployment)", | |
| "Both intrinsic (e.g., embedding analysis) and extrinsic (e.g., downstream task performance) evaluation methods", | |
| "Multi-level analysis (e.g., word, sentence, document levels for text; pixel, object, scene levels for images)" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Inclusive Protected Class Consideration": { | |
| "status": "Yes", | |
| "source": "3P", | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Evaluation of non-standard protected classes (e.g., socioeconomic status, education level, regional differences)", | |
| "Consideration of intersectionality and how identity aspects interact" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Cultural and Linguistic Diversity": { | |
| "status": "Yes", | |
| "source": "Both", | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Tests of model performance and biases across languages and cultures", | |
| "Analysis of the impact of different languages/scripts on image generation (for text-to-image models)", | |
| "Consideration of how protected categories may shift in meaning across regions" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Stereotype and Harmful Association Detection": { | |
| "status": "Yes", | |
| "source": "1P", | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Detection of stereotypical word associations in text models or visual representations in image models", | |
| "Sentiment analysis and toxicity measurements, especially regarding specific groups" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Performance Disparities Assessment": { | |
| "status": "No", | |
| "source": null, | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Detailed breakdowns of performance metrics (accuracy, precision, recall) for various subgroups", | |
| "Performance analysis for disadvantaged subgroups", | |
| "Intersectionality considerations in performance analysis" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Bias Mitigation and Impact Analysis": { | |
| "status": "Yes", | |
| "source": "1P", | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Documentation of bias mitigation strategies", | |
| "Analyses of how model updates or mitigations affect bias metrics" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Transparency and Limitations Disclosure": { | |
| "status": "Yes", | |
| "source": "Both", | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Clear statements on the capabilities and limitations of evaluation methods", | |
| "Acknowledgment of potential biases from the evaluation tools/processes", | |
| "Detailed explanations of bias-related metrics, including assumptions or limitations" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Ongoing Evaluation Commitment": { | |
| "status": "No", | |
| "source": null, | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Plans for continual bias assessment as the model is updated or deployed in new contexts", | |
| "Strategies for incorporating new findings/methodologies in evaluation", | |
| "Commitments to transparency and regular reporting on bias-related issues" | |
| ] | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| "Cultural Values and Sensitive Content Evaluation": { | |
| "Hate Speech and Toxicity Evaluation": { | |
| "status": "Yes", | |
| "source": "Both", | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Assessments of harmful text generation", | |
| "Evaluations of toxicity, hurtfulness, or offensiveness", | |
| "Examination of invasive bodily commentary or rejections of identity" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Cultural Value Representation": { | |
| "status": "Yes", | |
| "source": "3P", | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Use of pre-existing scholarship (e.g., World Values Survey, Geert Hofstede's work)", | |
| "Assessments of ethical scenarios and political value representation", | |
| "Evaluations of geopolitical statements and regional representation" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Diverse Cultural Context": { | |
| "status": "No", | |
| "source": null, | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Assessments that don't equate nationality with cultural context", | |
| "Representation of differing cultural values within countries", | |
| "Inclusion of marginalized communities' perspectives" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Sensitive Content Identification": { | |
| "status": "Yes", | |
| "source": "1P", | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Recognition of topics that vary by culture and viewpoint", | |
| "Assessment of content related to egregious violence", | |
| "Evaluation of adult sexual content identification" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Impact of Generated Content": { | |
| "status": "No", | |
| "source": null, | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Assessment of potential harm to targeted viewers", | |
| "Evaluation of content's potential to normalize harmful ideas", | |
| "Analysis of possible contributions to online radicalization" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Multidimensional Cultural Analysis": { | |
| "status": "Yes", | |
| "source": "Both", | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Evaluations at word, sentence, and document levels for text", | |
| "Analysis at pixel, object, and scene levels for images", | |
| "Multi-level analysis of cultural representation" | |
| ] | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| "Disparate Performance": { | |
| "Subpopulation Performance Analysis": { | |
| "status": "Yes", | |
| "source": "Both", | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Non-aggregated (disaggregated) evaluation results with in-depth breakdowns across subpopulations", | |
| "Metrics such as subgroup accuracy, calibration, AUC, recall, precision, min-max ratios", | |
| "Worst-case subgroup performance analysis" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Cross-lingual and Dialect Evaluation": { | |
| "status": "Yes", | |
| "source": "3P", | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Cross-lingual prompting on standard benchmarks", | |
| "Examination of performance across dialects", | |
| "Analysis of hallucination disparity across languages" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Image Generation Quality Assessment": { | |
| "status": "Yes", | |
| "source": "1P", | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Examination of generation quality across various concepts", | |
| "Accuracy of cultural representation in generated images", | |
| "Assessment of realism across different concepts" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Data Duplication and Bias Analysis": { | |
| "status": "No", | |
| "source": null, | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Analysis of the effect of retaining duplicate examples in the training dataset", | |
| "Evaluation of model bias towards generating certain phrases or concepts" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Dataset Disparities Evaluation": { | |
| "status": "Yes", | |
| "source": "1P", | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Assessment of dataset skew with fewer examples from some subpopulations", | |
| "Evaluation of feature inconsistencies across subpopulations", | |
| "Analysis of geographic biases in data collection" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Evaluation of Systemic Issues": { | |
| "status": "No", | |
| "source": null, | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Assessment of disparities due to dataset collection methods", | |
| "Evaluation of the impact of varying levels of internet access on data representation", | |
| "Analysis of content filters' effects on data availability" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Long-tail Data Distribution Analysis": { | |
| "status": "Yes", | |
| "source": "3P", | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Assessment of model performance on rare or uncommon data points", | |
| "Evaluation of the trade-off between fitting long tails and unintentional memorization" | |
| ] | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| "Environmental Costs and Carbon Emissions Evaluation": { | |
| "Energy Consumption Measurement": { | |
| "status": "Yes", | |
| "source": "1P", | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Measurement of energy used in training, testing, and deploying the system", | |
| "Evaluation of compute power consumption", | |
| "Assessment of energy resources used by large-scale systems" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Carbon Footprint Quantification": { | |
| "status": "Yes", | |
| "source": "3P", | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Use of tools like CodeCarbon or Carbontracker", | |
| "Measurement of carbon emissions for training and inference", | |
| "Conversion of energy consumption to carbon emissions" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Hardware Resource Evaluation": { | |
| "status": "Yes", | |
| "source": "1P", | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Assessment of CPU, GPU, and TPU usage", | |
| "Measurement of FLOPS (Floating Point Operations)", | |
| "Evaluation of package power draw and GPU performance state" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Comprehensive Environmental Impact Assessment": { | |
| "status": "No", | |
| "source": null, | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Use of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodologies", | |
| "Consideration of supply chains and manufacturing impacts", | |
| "Evaluation of immediate impacts of applying ML" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Transparency in Environmental Reporting": { | |
| "status": "Yes", | |
| "source": "Both", | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Disclosure of uncertainty around measured variables", | |
| "Reporting of marginal costs (e.g., added parameters' contribution to energy consumption)", | |
| "Transparency about equipment manufacturers and data/hosting centers" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Comprehensive Environmental Impact Metrics": { | |
| "status": "No", | |
| "source": null, | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Discussion of different approaches to measuring environmental impact", | |
| "Use of diverse measurements beyond energy consumption", | |
| "Consideration of various factors including lifecycle assessment" | |
| ] | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| "Privacy and Data Protection Evaluation": { | |
| "Data Minimization and Consent Practices": { | |
| "status": "Yes", | |
| "source": "Both", | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Implementation of data minimization practices", | |
| "Use of opt-in data collection methods", | |
| "Assessment of active consent for collecting, processing, and sharing data" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Memorization and Data Leakage Evaluation": { | |
| "status": "Yes", | |
| "source": "1P", | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Examination of the maximum amount of discoverable information given training data", | |
| "Evaluation of extractable information without training data access", | |
| "Analysis of out-of-distribution data revelation" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Personal Information Revelation Assessment": { | |
| "status": "Yes", | |
| "source": "3P", | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Direct prompting tests to reveal Personally Identifiable Information (PII)", | |
| "Use of tools like ProPILE to audit PII revelation likelihood", | |
| "Evaluation of the system's ability to infer personal attributes" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Image and Audio Privacy Evaluation": { | |
| "status": "Yes", | |
| "source": "1P", | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Assessment of training data memorization in image generation", | |
| "Use of adversarial Membership Inference Attacks for images", | |
| "Evaluation of the proportion of generated images with high similarity to training data" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Intellectual Property and Copyright Evaluation": { | |
| "status": "No", | |
| "source": null, | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Assessment of the system's ability to generate copyrighted content", | |
| "Evaluation of intellectual property concerns in generated content", | |
| "Analysis of the system's handling of highly sensitive documents" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Retroactive Privacy Protection": { | |
| "status": "No", | |
| "source": null, | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Assessment of the system's capability to retroactively retrain in accordance with privacy policies", | |
| "Evaluation of processes for removing specific data points upon request", | |
| "Analysis of the system's adaptability to changing privacy regulations" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Third-party Hosting Privacy Evaluation": { | |
| "status": "Yes", | |
| "source": "Both", | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Assessment of potential leakage of private input data in generations", | |
| "Evaluation of system prompt privacy, especially for prompts containing proprietary information", | |
| "Analysis of the system's handling of sensitive database records in context learning" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Generative AI-Specific Privacy Measures": { | |
| "status": "Yes", | |
| "source": "1P", | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Assessment of the applicability of data sanitization techniques to generative models", | |
| "Evaluation of differential privacy approaches in the context of generative AI", | |
| "Analysis of novel privacy protection methods designed specifically for generative models" | |
| ] | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| "Financial Costs Evaluation": { | |
| "Comprehensive Cost Evaluation": { | |
| "status": "Yes", | |
| "source": "1P", | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Estimation of infrastructure and hardware costs", | |
| "Calculation of labor hours from researchers, developers, and crowd workers", | |
| "Tracking of compute costs using low-cost or standard pricing per instance-hour" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Storage and Training Cost Analysis": { | |
| "status": "Yes", | |
| "source": "1P", | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Assessment of storage costs for both datasets and resulting models", | |
| "Consideration of in-house vs. cloud storage options", | |
| "Evaluation of training costs based on in-house GPUs or per-hour-priced instances" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Hosting and Inference Cost Evaluation": { | |
| "status": "Yes", | |
| "source": "Both", | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Evaluation of low-latency serving costs", | |
| "Assessment of inference costs based on token usage", | |
| "Consideration of factors such as initial prompt length and requested token response length" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Modality-Specific Cost Analysis": { | |
| "status": "Yes", | |
| "source": "1P", | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Assessment of costs related to pixel density and frame usage for image and video", | |
| "Evaluation of preprocessing costs for audio (e.g., spectrogram generation)", | |
| "Consideration of model architecture in cost calculations" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Long-term Cost Considerations": { | |
| "status": "No", | |
| "source": null, | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Assessment of pre- and post-deployment costs", | |
| "Consideration of human labor and hidden costs", | |
| "Tracking of changes in costs and economy of components over time" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "API Cost Evaluation": { | |
| "status": "Yes", | |
| "source": "1P", | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Assessment of token-usage based pricing", | |
| "Evaluation of cost variations based on initial prompt length and requested token response length", | |
| "Analysis of cost differences across model versions" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Comprehensive Cost Tracking": { | |
| "status": "No", | |
| "source": null, | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Assessment of costs related to broader infrastructure or organizational changes", | |
| "Evaluation of long-term maintenance and update costs", | |
| "Analysis of costs associated with complementary technologies or processes" | |
| ] | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| "Data and Content Moderation Labor Evaluation": { | |
| "Crowdwork Standards Compliance": { | |
| "status": "Yes", | |
| "source": "3P", | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Assessment of compliance with Criteria for Fairer Microwork", | |
| "Evaluation against Partnership on AI's Responsible Sourcing of Data Enrichment Services guidelines", | |
| "Comparison with Oxford Internet Institute's Fairwork Principles" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Crowdworker Demographics and Compensation": { | |
| "status": "Yes", | |
| "source": "Both", | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Documentation of crowd workers' demographics", | |
| "Transparency in reporting instructions given to crowdworkers", | |
| "Assessment of how crowdworkers were evaluated and compensated" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Psychological Support and Content Exposure": { | |
| "status": "No", | |
| "source": null, | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Documentation of immediate trauma support availability", | |
| "Assessment of long-term professional psychological support provision", | |
| "Evaluation of practices for controlling exposure to traumatic material" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Transparency in Crowdwork Documentation": { | |
| "status": "Yes", | |
| "source": "1P", | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Use of transparent reporting frameworks", | |
| "Documentation of crowdwork's role in shaping AI system output", | |
| "Evaluation of the accessibility of crowdwork information" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Crowdwork Stages and Types": { | |
| "status": "Yes", | |
| "source": "Both", | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Assessment of crowdwork in data gathering, curation, cleaning, and labeling", | |
| "Evaluation of crowdwork during model development and interim evaluations", | |
| "Examination of post-deployment crowdwork for output evaluation and correction" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Evaluation of Labor Protection and Regulations": { | |
| "status": "No", | |
| "source": null, | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Assessment of compliance with relevant labor law interventions by jurisdiction", | |
| "Evaluation of worker classification and associated protections", | |
| "Analysis of fair work practices and compensation structures" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Outsourcing Impact Evaluation": { | |
| "status": "Yes", | |
| "source": "3P", | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Assessment of communication barriers created by outsourcing", | |
| "Evaluation of differences in working conditions between in-house and outsourced labor", | |
| "Analysis of transparency in reporting structures for outsourced work" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "Impact of Precarious Employment": { | |
| "status": "No", | |
| "source": null, | |
| "applicable_evaluations": [ | |
| "Assessment of job security and its impact on worker feedback", | |
| "Evaluation of anonymous reporting systems for substandard working conditions", | |
| "Analysis of power dynamics between crowdworkers and employers" | |
| ] | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } |