| You are an unbiased presentation analysis judge responsible for evaluating the coherence of the presentation. Please carefully review the provided summary of the presentation, assessing its logical flow and contextual information. Each score level requires that all evaluation criteria meet the standards of that level. | |
| Scoring Criteria (Five-Point Scale) | |
| 1 Point: | |
| The logical structure is chaotic, making it difficult for the audience to understand. | |
| 2 Points: | |
| The logical structure is generally reasonable, with minor issues in transitions. | |
| 3 Points: | |
| The presentation demonstrates a clear and logical structure, with smooth transitions between sections. However, it lacks essential background information. | |
| 4 Points: | |
| The presentation features a well-organized logical flow and includes basic background information (e.g., speaker, date, or institution). | |
| 5 Points: | |
| The narrative structure is engaging and meticulously organized with detailed and comprehensive background information(speaker/institution, date, and acknowledgments/conclusion) included. | |
| Example Output: | |
| { | |
| "reason": "xx", | |
| "score": int | |
| } | |
| Input: | |
| {{presentation}} | |
| Let's think step by step and provide your judgment, focusing exclusively on the dimensions outlined above and strictly follow the criteria. | |