User1: need terminal app in server gui
User2: hy
User2: help my
User2: i instal squid on ubuntu server, but i can't cache youtube , why ?
User2: hy
User2: tes
User2: tes
User2: hy
User3: hmm
User2: ded
User3: hmm :) yes
User2: yuhu
User2: yg lain pada tidur kali ya om
User3: don't know
User4: New bug: #1022008 in clamav (main) "clamav" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1022008
User2: 1 tes
User2: hy
User2: tes
User2: tes
User2: hy
User5: hey guys how can i need to set grub to default boot onto the xen kernel and that seems to be in a submenu on grub2 how can i see and set that kernel to boot by default
User6: you set it in the grub config files, re-run update-grub to generate a new config then reboot
User5: User6 problem is is that the kernel gets installed in a grub submenu
User6: that is not a problem
User6: you still set it in the config
User6: treat the menu process as a directory listing
User5: ok waht has me confused is that on a clean 12.04 install it seems to use a numerical listing to tell grub which kernel to boot
User6: well, it can be, starting from 0
User6: that was brought across from grub legacy
User5: User6 so i can use paths as well O_o
User6: no, not paths,
User6: when I said think of it as a directory listing, I meant treat the listing as a directory, eg: top level down
User5: i did this line according to help.ubuntu.com article sudo sed -i 's/GRUB_DEFAULT=.*\+/GRUB_DEFAULT="Xen 4.1-amd64"/' /etc/default/grub and updated grub and rebooted im guessing that command wont work would it?
User6: that's not going to work
User6: you can try it though, I could be wrong
User5: i did try it and it didnt
User5: and this is on https://help.ubuntu.com/community/XenProposed#Installing_Xen
User5: User6 are the xen modules already compiled into the standard 12.04 kernel?
User5: which it seems like they are according to an lsmod | grep xen
User6: what are you talking about modules ?
User5: kernel modules
User6: what are you actually asking ?
User6: apologies if I'm not reading it clearly
User5: i know that as of the 3.0.x kernel stack release that xen has been included. question is do i need to install any special xen kernel or boot off a special kernel to use xen from what i have seen it seems like one needs to as the standard ubuntu kernels dont have xen compiled into it
User6: xen became part of the mainline kernel in 2.6.30-something, 33 ? 34 ? ish
User6: it should be in any kernel post that
User6: (you'll need to check 33-34, I can't remember which)
User5: ok
User6: anything post that will xen build into it's codebase, if that is an enabled option or not, is a different story
User6: User5 that wiki page you linked me to (just finished reading it) confirms that xen is part of the ubuntu kernel by default
User5: ok then why have i seen in grub a submenu with xen specific kernels
User6: what does that "sub menu" point to
User5: xen specific kernels
User6: which ones
User6: please name it
User5: User6 seems like that was in 11.10
User6: so basically you've not done any checking or home work on this
User6: why do you have 11.10 stuff on a 12.04 clean install ?
User5: i dont when i noticed this this was back on 11.10 i have 12.04 only now
User6: ah, so you've not checked this
User6: you've just assumed it was sub menus on 12.04
User6: when you've checked you've found it's not sub menus (I'm assuming)
User6: or is it still sub menu's on 12.04 too ?
User6: (shouldn't be as you shouldn't have a different kernel)
User5: ok well ill double check my home server again to make sure
User6: it's worth checking
User5: or even just reboot my netbook
User5: agreed :)
User6: please please, start trying to get your FACTS together
User6: how many times - stop making things up that you think are real, check and report on facts
User6: not picking on you, but we go through this same thing over and over,
User5: understood
User6: (you may well still have sub menus, but you need to check, and confirm)
User6: eg: you are lauren76@example.org kernels complaining about 12.04.
User6: need to stop that sort of thing
User4: New bug: #994212 in autofs5 (main) "ldap fails to start when /etc/network/interfaces not used" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/994212
User7: Nyaa~! I've just set up a Ubuntu 12.04 VPS, installed Apache2, MySQL and PHP... WordPress runs fine, so does Apache2... but WordPress doesn't seem to be able to touch any of the files in the www directory I've set up. My user has been added to www-data group, I've changed the owner of all files so they are in the www-data group and permissions are 770...
User7: And from what I can tell the sticky bit is set correctly as well... any ideas on how to fix the problem?
User7: (and Apache2 runs as www-data:www-data)
User8: User7 check /etc/apparmor.d/ for policy definitions restricting those processes
User7: ended up chowning the files... www-data is the new owner ^^;
User8: functionally equivilent if you set 770 :)
User7: I did.. even tried 777 and WordPress/Apache2 couldn't care less... XD
User8: apparmor is likely to ship with profiles that restrict both apache and php given that they're very large attack vectors, the problem might not be with apache or php but with apparmor limiting the abilities of the process through exec and the kernel
User8: or there's something weird going on :)
User7: and apparmor is automatically installed?
User8: i think it's been enforcing since 8.04
User8: https://help.ubuntu.com/12.04/serverguide/apparmor.html
User8: an easy method to test if a behaviour is due to apparmor is to place the profile in to complain mode then restart the process
User7: guess debian doesn't use apparmor then ^^;
User7: since that was what I was using before
User7: thank you Jacobw :3
User8: http://wiki.apparmor.net/index.php/Distro_debian#Not_Available_in_Stock_Debian
User9: I'm looking for a simple mail relay, like nullmailer / ssmtp, but one which will accept a message by SMTP on port 25, and then forward it on. Any recommendations?
User9: Something like postfix configured with a smart relay, but much, much simpler hopefully... :-)
 * andol always find Postfix simple enough, especially for doing simple things.
User10: postfix is pritty simple.
User11: have to agree, postfix is simple enough and easy to set up
User11: those minimalist solutions, in this case, are more trouble than they're worth
User4: New bug: #1022360 in asterisk (universe) "(CVE-2012-3812) CVE-2012-3812 asterisk: Remote crash vulnerability in voice mail application (CVE-2012-3863) CVE-2012-3863 asterisk: Possible resource leak on uncompleted re-invite transactions" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1022360
User4: New bug: #1022385 in samba (main) "package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 128" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1022385
User4: New bug: #1022386 in etckeeper (main) "Unable to obtain lock file:///etc/ held by root" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1022386
ubuntu-server
Ubuntu IRC