User1: User2 no, in the Projects -> Desktop -> Run -> Add deploy step. But you d not need this if you use the latest SDK from 14.04
User2: User1 I'm on the latest SDK from 14.04...
User2: that fixed it
User2: kind of
User1: User2 Then I do not know... I just opened a new project from the templates (extension lib + Tabbed UI) with Desktop target as default and hit the green rectangle... the app builds and shows up
User2: setting the binary as a deploy step makes it run, but then after I close it it says the same error
User2: User1 I'm trying it on Trojita, which is a C++ app with QML UI
User2: so I have a 'trojita-ubu' binary
User1: User2  I am trying the same
User2: which is listed and selected as a run configuration in Projects -> Desktop -> Run
User1: User2 Let me try it
User1: User2  today is not the best day :) everybody is off in Europe
User2: User1 IT'S 23:20 for me anyway
User1: User2  oh man, it is still yesterday for you...
User1: User2  this trojita builds slow... still 78%
User2: it's a bit slow when you build it all, yeah
User2: anyway, I'll talk to you in 8-9 hours
User1: User2  cheers, I will check it out and try to talk to zbenjamin too
User3: Good morning
User4: hello every one.
User4: i am a php web developer.
User4: now i want to get into the ubuntu phone htm5 app development
User3: User4 nice :) welcome
User4: thanks!
User4: i want some some help regarding installtion of ubuntu sdk
User3: User4 what help do you need
User4: i am unable to install ubuntu sdk, an errror comes with you have broken pakages.
User4: error displayed here it is
User4: sudo apt-get install ubuntu-sdk
User4: Reading package lists... Done
User4: Building dependency tree
User4: Reading state information... Done
User4: Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
User4: requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
User4: distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
User4: or been moved out of Incoming.
User4: The following information may help to resolve the situation:
User4: The following packages have unmet dependencies:
User4: ubuntu-sdk : Depends: ubuntu-html5-container but it is not going to be installed
User4: E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
User3: did you add the ppa
User4: ppa no
User3: sudo add-apt-repository ppa:ubuntu-sdk-team/ppa
User3: sudo apt-get update
User3: this might do the trick
User3: description can be found here
User3: http://developer.ubuntu.com/apps/sdk/tutorials/installing-the-sdk/
User4: on update its showing this error
User4: W: A error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index files will be used. GPG error: http://extras.ubuntu.com raring Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 16126D3A3E5C1192 Ubuntu Extras Archive Automatic Signing Key <hking@example.com>
User4: W: GPG error: http://in.archive.ubuntu.com raring Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 40976EAF437D05B5 Ubuntu Archive Automatic Signing Key <hking@example.com>
User4: W: Failed to fetch http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/raring/Release
User4: W: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead.
User3: hmm =s
User4: how could i get out of this
User3: does sudo apt-get update --fix-missing work ?
User4: yes it did.
User4: but in the end i showed the above displayed error message
User3: hmm
User3: User4 sorry I dced
User3: sudo apt-key adv --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 40976EAF437D05B5
User3: and than try thr sudo apt-get update again
User3: brb
User4: its is still showing the same.
User4: is it internal problem with my distribution ubuntu 13.04 raring desktop
User3: I dont know
User3: btw any reason you haven't upgraded to 13.10 or now 14.04 ?
User3: I ran out of idea's, maybe try to google it and see if you can find something there
User3: Im also not on ubuntu atm so its hard to test things
User4: actually on upgrade i have to re install, all my packages algain
User4: n reconfigure them too
User3: if I remembered correcty you can also upgrade and than reenable your ppa's afterwards
User4: okay!
User3: first to 13.10 i think and than to 14.04
User4: so should i upgrade to 14.04
User4: it is beta version
User3: no it released yesterday :)
User4: oh! thanks
User3: I'm running it on my laptop
User4: i should go with this first
User4: well, temme one more thing.
User3: maybe upgrading will solve the problem (not sure if the suport was only 9 months or not
User4: i want my carrier with ubuntu web/app development, so what preparation or what thing i should do for the same.
User4: it need a proper planning.
User4: if you please give  me a way, or direction.
User4: i am very desperate towards this.
User3: User4 I don't really get it
User4: in simple words, i want to work for ubuntu app development, and then the concern thing is earning. how could i do this.
User3: ow, well, at the moment you can only have free apps, I'm not sure but maybe you can try something like adds or in app purchaces, but you xwould have to check that
User4: okay! thank you very much for your precious time.
User4: nice to meet you.
User3: User4 no problemo :) nice to meet you 2
User3: I hope you get your problem solved
User5: good morning
User3: Aki-Thinkpad: wow, thats stupid, without a warning ?
User3: :s
User3: kinda sad to get banned for forming an opinion
User3: but I upgraded to 14.04 and it was actually really smooth
User3: dutchuss2016
User3: 11:12:22
User3: I just updated ubuntu and now it wont start :p
User3: :p was mine
User3: altough that might also be about skype :p
User3: yea skype, sorry wasn't clear at first :p
User3: but I do wonder how smooth 12.04 to 14.04 is
User3: wow, that didn't sound like ranting
User3: maybe try to get hold of an other admin
User3: no problem, the economy used to run on steam :p
User6: User1 whats up
User3: Aki-Thinkpad: took you a long time :p
User3: Aki-Thinkpad: \'3c
User3: Aki-Thinkpad: http://my.safaribooksonline.com/book/programming/microsoft-office/9781449302047/reference-tables/ascii-rtf_character_chart
User3: Aki-Thinkpad: does it work ?
User3: hmm :s
User3: what are you working on Aki-Thinkpad
User3: Aki-Thinkpad: &lt; already tried this one ?
User3: and \R/RTF'\f6\fs18\u8804\3'
User3: or maybe just a part from that
User3: if that doesn't work, im out of ideas
User7: hi, is there anyone italian?
User6: User2 here?
User8: Vai su #ubuntu-it se vuoi parlare in italiano, in questo canale usiamo solo l'inglese. Grazie! (per entrare, scrivi Â« /join #ubuntu-it Â» senza virgolette)
User7: ok, bye
User7: .)
User7: :)
User3: autch
User1: User6 mhall119 had problem (and me too) to run the trojita app from the qtc
User6: User1 yeah because QtC does not realize that trojita is a Click App
User1: User6  I mean that it does not run on the desktop
User1: User6  local build, local run
User6: User1 oh, thats weird
User6: User1 does it work if you disable the ubuntu plugin?
User6: User1 disable ubuntu plugin, remove user file and reload the project
User1: User6  it says "no executable specified"
User1: User6  similar problem .. the "run configuration" is not trojita
User1: User6  so it needs the run configuration to be set to trojita
User6: User1 hmm yeah, there is no way to tell QtC to prefer a runconfig, all we could do is use a QTimerbd6c:f4c4:4f6:c742:59d8:35db:68f6:4d5fsingleShot() to set the runconfig when the control goes back to the eventloop
User1: User6  strange that the runconfig with the same name as the project is not the default
User6: User1 yeah it works like that: you can register RunConfiguration factories, QtC will iterate over them and asks each of them if it can provide a runconfig for the current project
User6: User1 first come first serve
User6: User1 i guess we can't go around providing our own project type as we discussed with the mime magic string
User1: User6  I see
User6: User1 its too much hacking
User6: User1 hacking as in workarounds :/
User1: User6  LOL
User1: User6  this trojita is a good test app... the chroot build failed
User1: :-1: error: No targets specified and no makefile found.  Stop.
User6: User1 i would suggest to first create a custom project type for us, maybe we can require some module to be included, then we can query the project file for the magic string and handle everything ourselves
User1: User6  I would suggest to see why trojita does not build :)
User1: User6  ehhh... ignore me, my chroot ust miss tons of deps
User6: User1 lol ;)
User6: just wanted to start up QtC
User1: User6  Qt QTWEBKIT library not found. Qt QTGUI library not found. Qt QTTEST library not found. Qt QTSQL library not found. Qt QTNETWORK library not found. Qt QTCORE library not found.
User6: User1 wtf, did you enable the ubuntu build?
User6: -DWITH_UBUNTU=on
User6: User1 otherwise it tries to build some Qt4 app ;)
User1: User6  good hint... I missed that.
User1: User6  now it started to build... I am motivated :) I want an IMAP client on the device ....
User3: do we get an IMAP client ? :D WHOOT WHOOT
User6: User1 that would be awesome
User5: bzoltan smtp support should be working by early next week
User3: if you where on the trusty devel branch, will you still get updates ?
User1: User3 yes, that is what we are building right now ..
User1: User5  cool... I need that one too :)
User6: User1 i could use some hiking app, there is maep-qt for sailfish that can show tiled maps and load tracks. Would be interesting to port it, but not with my device ;)
 * DanChapman is working as fast as he can
User1: User6  for me the ad-hoc wlan access point is the show starter ...
User6: User5 go go go :)
User5: hah :-)
User1: User5  push it, dude, push it :)
User6: User1 we have ad hoc wlan?
User1: User6  not as I know... but I need that
User6: User1 yes, sailfish has it now too
User1: User6 I know.. and it is even a real infrastructure wlan what creates
User3: anybody else also having this problem ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-calendar-app/+bug/1309042
User8: Launchpad bug 1309042 in Ubuntu Calendar App "Calendar sync only syncs the default calendar" [Undecided,New]
User9: justCarakas, pretty sure thats known and tbd
User9: bzoltan, is the ubuntu-sdk package in the release ppa?
User10: I still have another problem installing ubuntu-emulator pmcgowan
User9: Neo31, ok whats that
User10: http://paste.ubuntu.com/7275350/
User9: thats odd, one sec
User9: Neo31, what does apt-cache policy ubuntu-emulator-runtime say
User10: User9 http://paste.ubuntu.com/7275357/
User9: offs
User9: its in multiverse
User10: ok gotcha
User9: man docs need updating
User9: mhall119, hey, we need to update the sdk install page, its busted
User10: still cannot install pmcgowan : http://paste.ubuntu.com/7275382/
User9: Neo31, did you rerun apt-get update?
User9: I see it there for sure
User10: ok let me clean the cache
User9: just sudo apt-get update should fix it
User9: if you entered the repo name correctly
User10: I have added this line : deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty multiverse
User10: apt-get clean then update then install
User9: ok
User10: ubuntu-emulator is available but a dependency is missing (ubuntu-emulator-runtime)
User10: brb
User10: User9 maybe the ubuntu-emulator-runtime is in a missing repository!?
User9: its only built for i386
User9: let me find some guys
User9: not right
User10: ok i will try to install i386 deps
User9: http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/multiverse/a/android/
User10: i see, so the solution is to work on a 32bit system or to find a workaround (maybe by installing some 32bit libs?)
User9: Neo31, but thats busted, I am trying to find the devs
User9: I know folks are running on 64bbit
User9: problem is everyone is on good friday holiday
User10: yep that's it. This is for an app dev workshop I am preparing for tomorrow.
User9: oh crap
User10: I see
User9: bzoltan, zbenjamin you guys still around?
User10: I tried few days ago, but since I was on an early daily build live DVD i thought things will be good today after the final release.
User9: it should have been fine all along
User9: I happen to have 32 bit here for no good reason ;(
User10: but the critical part is ubuntu-sdk and that is alreay solved :) thanks to you pmcgowan
User9: good
User9: Neo31, someone is sure to pop online, so maybe check back later
User10: i will pmcgowan :)
User9: day after release, no one around :)
User10: I might need to restart once or twice to boot my main os or another live cd
User10: just a little question pmcgowan
User10: I think the emulator is i386 anyway and there should be some ia32 thing for 32bit compatibility.
User9: right, I suspect the dependency is wrong maybe, and it should pull it in after install
User10: shouldn't the 64bit package dependency be changed to meet these needs instead of missing a non existing 64 bit package?
User9: right
User9: thats what I dont understand
User10: I will check that later on IRC and if this is what should happen I will fire a bug for the package maintainer
User10: thanks for helping pmcgowan
User10: have a good day :)
User9: ok ttyl
User8: Aki-Thinkpad: I am only a bot, please don't think I'm intelligent :)
User8: Wow! You're such a great helper, you deserve a cookie!
User2: User9 /Touch/Install?
User9: mhall119, hi, no the sdk install page
User9: mhall119, it doesn't work for trusty at all, since ubuntu-sdk is not from the PPA
User11: User9 whats wrong with the emulator?
User9: its from universe (today anyway)
User9: popey, I suspect nothing, he must have added the multiverse repo incorrectly
User11: multiverse is on by default, has been for ages
User9: dunno then
User9: he probably had a customer list
User9: mhall119, popey also, we should add instructions for emulator on the sdk install page?
User11: User9 not just emulator, click-reviewers-tools too
User11: IMO the emulator should come with the sdk, not be separate
User9: not sure
User9: its a monster
User11: is it?
User11: Size: 1659916
User11: Size: 8935370
User11: hm, okay
User11: Size: 40343310
User9: but should be easy to get from qtc
User9: not sure we did that yet
User9: anyway he tried to apt-get the sdk and it didnt work, I guess becuase he turned of universe and multiverse
User9: I thought one needed to enable those, no?
User9: been so long since I clean installed
User11: ubuntu-sdk is in universe
User9: yeah I know
User9: is it on in new installs?
User11: they're on by default in new installs yes
User9: popey, ok, I thought not
User9: so maybe docs are fine
User2: User9 User1 should we tell Trusty users to use the archive version instead of the PPA version of the SDK?
User11: i thought we decided to use the ppa always, so we can deliver updates quickly
User2: that's what I thought too
User9: right we did
User9: but today at least the PPA has no trusty version of ubuntu-sdk
User2: User1 ^^ why doesn't it?
User9: mhall119, I think everyone is holidaze today
User9: but I dont see one
User6: User9 now back
User9: mhall119, I assume all the other packages are in the ppa for trusty
User9: just the meta is not, but it should be now forward
User9: zbenjamin, was trying to help a dev earlier but he's gone now
User9: zbenjamin, just noticed the release ppa does not have a ubuntu-sdk package for trusty
User11: does it need it?
User11: i mean, whether you add the ppa or not, if you then "apt-get install ubuntu-sdk" you'll get the sdk..
User6: User9 zoltan is handling the ppa usually
User9: popey, right, it only needs it if the meta info changes
User9: popey, I was concerned we needed to tell folks to enable universe and multiverse but you clarified that for me
User1: User9 because Trusty has the trusty version
User1: User2 ^^
User9: bzoltan, right, so its ok today but at some point may be needed in the ppa
User1: User9 when the U is open and when we start to push to U our changes I will backport to the T in the PPA
User9: bzoltan, instructions "imply" the sdk ppa is all thats required to install, the dev had removed universe from is sources list
User9: bzoltan, vg
User1: User9  I did not not backport to S beacuse the Qt5.2 packages are missing
User9: ok
User9: well, we should support S and T
User9: bzoltan, I think we agreed to target last release and last LTS
User12: If I wanted to use a c/c++ lib, I would have to create a qml wrapper?
User1: User9  Yes, the S backporting is going to happen when Mirv has time to backport the Qt5.2 dependencies
User9: mhall119, still about?
User9: do we have docs on how to make a webapps on d.u.c?
User9: nm
User9: ah we do but its outdated
User2: yeah, it hasn't been updated in a while
User2: and since Unity8 doesn't support it yet anyway, it hasn't been a big concern
User9: mhall119, but no way for folks to know how to make one for phone?
User9: how are they working it out?
User9: like how to use the container?
User2: User9 oh, you mean create a click package for a website?
User9: you're back
User2: I thought you meant the webapps integration, which is what is on developer.u.c right now
User9: yeah
User9: well both but right now for touch
User2: I don't think we have anything for that, since it's mostly creating a .desktop with the right webbrowser-app flags in the Exec= line
User2: alex_abreu: do you know if we have anymore info that that?
User9: mhall119, one of the devs converted a qml webview to webapp but he did it wrong, thats why I asked
User9: I am jutst trying to copy the others but having some issues
User2: right, we need to put something up, we just don't have it atm
User9: mhall119, ok, would take much
User9: er would not
User9: mhall119, so my webapp isnt running and I cant figure out why
User2: User9 pastebin your .desktop and manifest.json please
User2: apparmor .json too
User9: http://paste.ubuntu.com/7278458/
User9: http://paste.ubuntu.com/7278459/
User9: http://paste.ubuntu.com/7278461/
User9: trying to help adrian with his app
User9: but I just get black screen
User9: well my url pattern is wrong but thats not it
User10: pmcgowan, i was able to install ubuntu-emulator trusty 64bit (this time from an installed system not a live system)
User9: Neo31, ok good, yeha it should have worked
User2: hmm, everything looks in order
User9: so it seems to me too
User2: jdstrand: is http://paste.ubuntu.com/7278461/ using the right apparmor template for a webapp?
User9: let me fix that url
User9: mhall119, is there a way to clear out all of the files for an installed app?
User9: uninstall seems to clean up
User2: click unregister
User2: should do it
User9: thanks mhall119
ubuntu-app-devel
Ubuntu IRC