User1: thumper: you seem to be thumping a few joins
User2: +junk branches cannot merge into other branches, can they?
User2: Rather, can I request a merge?
User3: User2 No, you can't.
User3: If code is in a state that such a thing is wanted, it's probably actually a project.
User2: User3 mk. I'm eyeing lp:~ubuntu-dev/+junk/ack-sync , which I wrote some patches for. Would it be a faux pas to create a project for it and reassign it?
User2: *reassign the branch
User3: User2 Doesn't that belong in u-d-t?
User2: User3 probably, but I'm not sure how we'd propose to merge it. I think it's probably on the same footing a syncpackage, not officially endorsed. Anyway, I'm not the author of the code, so I'm not sure if I'm the right person to request a merge. (although I technically could merge it without discussion)
User4: is there a reason why dget doesn't work on PPA .dscs?
User3: User4 It should work. What goes wrong?
User4: User3 I get 404s on the orig.tar.gz
User4: User3 dget: curl miro_1.1.2.orig.tar.gz https://edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ffox35/+files/miro_1.1.2.orig.tar.gz failed
User3: User4 Ah. If you use the archive URL it will work fine.
User3: But the LP webapp one won't work for some files at the moment (it's a bug).
User3: But it should work for most stuff.
User4: k, the bug's been filed I assume?
 * micahg actually has them all locally  (I think)
User3: Yes.
User3: It's known, but not easy.
User4: User3 k
User5: any way to suppress the warning message when anonymously getting source from a LP repo?
User6: hi
User6: when will the karma be updated? i answered a lot of question and the karma is dropped :/
User7: User6 some hours later
User6: well, the answers are 15h old...
User7: User6 with 24 h then :)
User7: a curiosity: why is the karma so important, defcon?
User6: it's not important, i'm just wondering why it is dropped
User6: ;)
User7: User6 as I said the karma will be updated within 24 h
User7: so wait 24 h, what's your launchpad ID?
User6: from this time the answers are written?
User7: User6 if you tell me your launchpad ID I could see
User6: thanks for help in the query BlackZ
User6: cya
User8: hi
User8: there is a package missing from my PPA page
User8: https://launchpad.net/~pmjdebruijn/+archive/ppa/+packages?field.name_filter=&field.status_filter=published&field.series_filter=lucid
User8: gnome-color-manager should be there as well
User9: User8 it was deleted: https://launchpad.net/~pmjdebruijn/+archive/ppa/+packages?field.name_filter=&field.status_filter=&field.series_filter=lucid
User8: User9 huh?
User8: erhm
User8: I might have deleted a failed build
User8: does that delete the proper build as well :(
User9: Deleted  on 2010-05-09  by Pascal de Bruijn
User9: Build-Depends on packages not in Lucid.
User8: yeah
User8: I ment to delete the failed build
User8: not the good one
User8: crap
User9: you don't need to delete failed builds, nothing is published
User9: just upload a new version
User8: User9 there was never going to be a newer version
User8: User9 the upstream has dependancies that can't be met
User9: User8 I'm saying, if it failed to build, no new packages would be published and the previous version would still be available
User8: User9 but then I'm stuck with the build failed messages on my PPA
User9: when you choose to delete it, you're asking for the package(s) to be removed from the PPA, not just that version
User9: *that package in that series
User9: User8 as you can see, even if you delete it you still have the failed to build message
User9: it's not something which impacts your PPA, so there is really no reason (other than ascetic or pride) to remove it
User8: User9 I noticed :)
User8: User9 btw can I view that log myself?
User9: which log?
User8: delete
User9: yeah, it's available to everyone, just click on the deleted source and it'll show it
User8: ah
User8: status = any
User8: right, thanks
User9: the default view is to only show published packages in a PPA, as that's what most people would be interested in
User8: indeed
User8: heh
User8: and I can't resubmit my package
User8: I disabled my old GPG key, so I had to resign
User8: I guess I can up the version
User8: It's a bit of a shame that policy sometimes requires senseless versioning
User10: hi all !
User10: I can't import any svn revision with pear.
User10: https://code.launchpad.net/~stk-team/stk/trunk
User10: but it works with russkaya
User11: my package for intrepid keeps getting rejected with "Cannot build any of the architectures requested: all" - what does this actually mean?
User12: User11 as intrepid is EOL, PPA doesn't support intrepid either anymore
User9: Intrepid is no longer supported, it reached end of life in April
User11: oh
User11: but... the hardy package seems to have built just fine
User11: or is that an lts release?
User9: User11 yes, Hardy is LTS
User11: right, thanks for explaining :) one less distro to worry about, too
User13: how do i add a new language from an existing template in rosetta? do i need to upload it again, or create a .po file and commit?
User14: hello i cant post crash. i got error something http 500
User14: if ill send crash to another computer and try from that send then it will send with crashed computers logs yes?
User15: rejected: Cannot build any of the architectures requested: any
User12: User15 intrepid?
User15: affirmatyive
User15: it just rejects any?
User12: intrepid is EOL and PPA doesn't support it anymore
User15: cool!
User15: i dig it
User15: i don't have to send anything in for it anymore then
User14: anybody can answer my question?
User14: ill be back in 3 min
launchpad
Ubuntu IRC