User1: installling now, first testing install from menu, then i'll try boot live and then install
User1: okay, installed direct (i.e. without live boot) and phasex and aeolus both started
User1: i don't really do midi/synth stuff so i didn't know what to really do with them </embarrassed grin>
User1: booting into live now and then will install
User1: len__, both aeolus and phasex worked for me right after installing from live boot as well
User2: ScottL, I think I will invalidate the bugs then. Maybe there has been a lib change from yesterday to today. Both of my boxes work now too.
User3: One of the bugs was already invalidated... not enough stack trace to mean anything. They did seem to think wrong lib version might be it though.
User2: Most synths are easy to test ScottL, plug the virt keyboard to midi in and the output to jack... press some keys on the virt keys and hear sound ;-)
User2: aeolus is harder, the manual has to have the midi input assigned to it and sounds selected.
User2: aeolus is able to be played like a 3 manual pipe organ if you have three midi keyboards and a set of pedals.
User4: scott-work: True, wrong bug totally. :)
User5: scott-work, btw, did you already see http://open.knome.fi/2012/04/16/looking-towards-xubuntu-q/ ?
User5: :)
User5: no, it's a more verbose onw
User5: *one
User5: next thing i should paste you is the rewritten strategy document when i get to proof-read it one more time
User5: Len-live, i've no idea, i'm not a programmer
User5: Len-live, just ask #xfce-dev
User5: i hope so
User5: one of the items for xubuntu too is documentation
User5: we partly overlap because of xfce
User5: sure
User5: ;]
User5: i think it's a bit unrealistic now too
User5: noting that even the IS won't get it up in a day
User5: i mean, releasing parallel with 12.04
User5: two weeks after is probably fine
User5: if you can find time to work on it now
User5: i have a ticket pending for four days now to update the xubuntu.org code
User5: i suppose you could get a relatively high priority for the US site
User5: yeah, completely
User5: the workload probably eases after release
User5: so we can get back to better times
User5: and of course, you can push for high priority on some items now and then
User5: derivatives are never over ubuntu stuff, but you can get quite high
User5: i'm off :)
User5: see you later
User1: something else we probably need to consider is if there are any SRU's we might want to do quickly after release (if that is not frowned upon)
User6: User1 everyone does it :)
User6: you can start staging them now if you like
 * ScottL realizes he still didn't get the clock plugin correct
User6: if it's a deal breaker on the ISO, we can still respin
User1: i was basing it on what xubuntu did but didn't get it proper
User6: Xubuntu switched to the datetime plugin
User1: micahg, it's not a deal break, but not what was intended
User1: micahg, yes, i was looking at a few revisions ago, plus i wanted to look at xubuntu and how the new clock works and consider it for us
User6: that's the problem with C/P in general, unless you know the context, it's easy to take a change that won't help
User1: C/P?
User6: cut and paste
 * micahg probably used the wrong abbrv
User6: should've been C&P :)
User1: oh, i didn't cut and paste, i was changing the value but i needed the other part
User1: the variable name
User1: BUT it does look like the plugin had been updated so that might have changed anyways from what was used previously
ubuntustudio-devel
Ubuntu IRC