User1: morning all
User1: User2 there are issues with wubi trying to get some details for ev now
User2: davmor2, morning davmor
User2: davmor2, thanks for testing, you rock!
User3: Hrm, is seeing a fatal error before plymouth comes up on kubuntu about being unable to insert the ramzswap module due to unknown symbols known?
User3: Okay, I see it with both the ubuntu and kubuntu amd64 desktop isos... seeing if I see it on the i386 isos.
User3: yep, i386 as well.
User2: sbeattie, your kubuntu desktop looks like the netbook version? is that normal?
User3: User2 I can't get the kubuntu desktop image to come waltersstacy@example.net.
User2: sbeattie, well, I haven't installed, I was talking about the live mode
User3: Right, I was trying to install it, but I think I'm hitting OOM due to the compcache/ramzswap issue; I'll give my guest more memory and try the live environment.
User3: User2 sigh, my test server finally caught up. Yes, I'm seeing the netbook environment for the kubuntu livecd
User3: (amd64)
User2: I was trying to contact Ridell, but he doesn't seem to be around
User2: is kubuntu-meta a good candidate for a bug report?
User3: probably
 * sbeattie needs to go back to bed for a bit.
User2: night sbeattie
User2: morning pedro_
User4: hello ara
User5: Hey... trying an upgrade... but she's not finding anythin'
User5: bug time or something already known?
User5: NM... network problem resolved.
User2: charlie-tca, it worked for me
User5: charlie-tca:  yeah, knew that... I did something stupid and my test system didn't grab and IP address like it should have
User6: charlie-tca: I fixed that a couple of days ago
User7: User2 Hello.
User2: primes2h, hey!
User2: primes2h, how are you=
User2: ?
User7: User2 fine thanks! are you well?
User2: good thanks :)
User7: User2 I have a big problem, I can't get more bug entry fileds on the ISO tracker
User7: s/fileds/fields
User7: Just 3
User2: have you try to post your result with just 3, and then click on more bugs?
User7: Yes
User7: no luck
User7: it reloads the page
User7: but it doesn't add more fields
User2: primes2h, can you file a bug against ubuntu-qa-website? I will have a look before alpha3
User2: in the mean while, please, file the 3 more important in those fields, and the rest as comments
User7: User2 I tried to set the test has completed (passed) and the update it but no luck as well
User7: d/the
User7: User2 Ok!
User2: primes2h, I discovered a workaround
User2: primes2h, if you want to try
User7: User2 sure, tell me.
User2: put 3 bugs, then "more bug fields", then edit one of the already selected ones and submit
User2: 4 fields should appear
User7: User2 ahah... I tought about that but didn't tried ;-)
User2: did it work?
User2: primes2h, ^
User7: User2 no. :-(
User2: mmm, it worked for me
User2: what are the steps you did?
User7: User2 oh yes.
User7: User2 wait
User7: it works if I click on "More bug entry fields" but it doesn't if I click on Update result.
User7: after changing the bug number
User7: User2 so it works now! :-) Thank you
User7: I'll mention it on the bug report.
User2: primes2h, yes, please, do, so we can point people with the same question to that bug report
User7: User2 sure.
User8: Is it safe to grab the kubuntu DVD and start testing it or are there more respins coming on it?
User2: fader_, no respins planed
User8: User2 Awesome, thanks.  That was my guess but I'd rather find out before I start testing :)
User8: I can only test i386 images at the moment so someone else will have to do the amd64 :(
 * fader_ will fix that before Alpha 3.
User2: fader_, I cannot access the iso tracker at this moment, can you?
User9: User8 can't access either
User8: User2 Nope, not now... it was fine ~5-10 minutes ago
User8: It looks like a proxy/cache issue
User5: anyone having problems accessing launchpad?
User5: also, has anyone had success with d-i via the alternate images?
User8: User5 Yeah, looks like you broke lp
User8: User5 alternate -studio i386 worked just fine for me last night
User5: all I did was sh ./fader_lp_updates.sh
User5: :(
User5: hrmmm... ok... maybe it's whatever happened to lp and qa.u.c
User8: Oh man, if the launchpad folks are taking updates from me we might as well all give up and go home
User5: I can't reach LP or isotracker, and whatever killed that could be what is killing my d-i install then (it's dying where it checks the repositories for software)
User8: edge.launchpad.net is borked too
User8: Yeah, that might be it
User5: heh... I'd have said I'll hold off on opening a bug until I try later, but I can't even open a bug right now :/  heh
User8: iso.qa.u.c and lp are back up
User7: User8 launchpad is still down :-(
User8: User7 Working for me
User7: User8 It's 15 minutes I'm trying to report a bug :-( timeout error
User7: now
User7: before it was down
User8: Hmm... I haven't tried reporting anything but loading bugs was working well
User7: User8 no way, tried edge too.
User7: User8 now it works. It happened reporting a bug against a not existing package.
User5: repos are waltersstacy@example.net... my d-i install is working properly now...
User8: Ah, heh :)
User7: User8 it should tell the package doesn't exist, shouldn't it? ;-)
User8: User7 Heh, probably.  File a bug ;)
User5: ahh... nope... failed :( it installed the base packages. guess I'm back to bug filing...
User7: User2 is "ubuntu-qa-website" correct?
User2: primes2h, yes
User7: User2 I can't file the bug against that project
User2: primes2h, whyÂ¿Â¿
User2: primes2h, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-qa-website/+filebug
User2: can you try again please'
User8: Hmm, where should I file kubuntu-specific ubiquity bugs?  Still against ubiquity?
User8: I don't see a 'kubuntu' project
User5: crud... ok, what's the proper package for filing against d-i?
User5: User8  ^^ also kubuntu :/
User8: User5 debian-installer
User5: OK... which means upstream then... cool.  Just wanted to be sure
User2: fader_, still ubiquity
User2: bladernr_, what do you mean by upstream?
User8: User2 Okay, thanks.  I wasn't sure as it's a theming issue.
User7: User2 I get it, I had to report the bug against Ubuntu before because I was getting a lot of timeout errors, then I tried to change it but I couldn't do it. Then I opened a new task against Ubuntu QA Website setting Invalid the Ubuntu  one.
User5: bugs.launchpad.net/debian-installer says I have to waltersstacy@example.net
User5: User2  ^^^
User7: bug #600685
User10: Launchpad bug 600685 in ubuntu (and 1 other project) "Cannot add more than 3 bug entry fields in the ISO Tracker. (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/600685
User2: bladernr_, you have to file agasint the ubuntu package
User5: ahhhh... ok
User2: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+filebug
User2: primes2h, thanks!
User7: User2 np :-)
User2: fader_, what do you want to file? that it does not have a proper theme?
User2: fader_, cause I already filed that one
User2: fader_, in case you want to confirm it
User8: User2 Heh, that was the one.  I didn't see it when searching.
User2: fader_, let me find it for you
User8: User2 Thanks!
User8: It's really ugly
User8: :)
User2: fader_, bug 600646
User10: Launchpad bug 600646 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Kubuntu ubiquity is unthemed (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/600646
User8: User2 Thanks!
User5: User2  why is there no easy way to do that? ex: b.lp.net/debian-installer tells me to waltersstacy@example.net, bugs.lp.net/ubuntu report a bug link sends me to the wiki that says find the package name but doesn
User5: doesn't make it easy... sigh...
User5: ara, sorry... just frustrated
User2: bladernr_, we are trying to avoid people filing bugs without package
User11: User5 from inside ubiquity can't you use ubuntu-bug?
User5: right... like I said... just frustrated, since to me, at least, the obvious course would have been the b.lp.net/debian-installer page...
User2: cyphermox, he's using the alternate
User5: User11  d-i, not ubiquity... so no :( AFAIK, there's no ubuntu-bug in d-i...
User11: ah, then yeah, you can't :P
User5: uhh.. ara beat me to it
User5: it would be nice to have that feature in d-i though...
User2: bladernr_, we had an UDS session on that
User11: User5 it's stuff we discussed in UDS though, which we are supposed to do something about
User2: cjwatson will work on it
User5: yeah, I know... I'm impatient :-)
User5: User2  OT: your package arrived today!
User2: bladernr_, cool!
User2: :)
User2: bladernr_, thanks!
User5: no problem :)
User11: User5 no, it's good to bring the issue up
User2: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/qa-maverick-apport-udebs
User2: I thought it was cjwatson who commited to those changes, but it is assigned to you, cyphermox
User2: and I cannot see the tasks that we agreed during the session, nor the spec
User2: sbeattie, User9 ^ ?
User12: User2 I commented on bug 600632 (although it came up as jussi), I think we're going to have to explain this loud and clear as I expect we'll get lots of similar comments
User10: Launchpad bug 600632 in kubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) "Kubuntu Maverick Desktop Live shows Kubuntu Netbook desktop instead (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/600632
User12: also kubuntu-netbook images aren't needed but I can't work out how to remove them from the trqacker
User2: Riddell, I can remove them. Let me know when you want them to be removed
User8: Does anybody have the i386 kubuntu DVD downloaded?
User8: I'd like to see if someone can confirm bug 600697
User10: Launchpad bug 600697 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "[maverick] kubuntu DVD install crashes (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/600697
User12: User2 remove kubuntu netbook now if you can
User12: User2 who do I ask to get a "netbook live session" test added to kubuntu desktop images?
User2: Riddell, I can do that as well
User2: Riddell, can you send me an email with exact details of what you want?
User12: cool, yes I'll e-mail
ubuntu-testing
Ubuntu IRC