
==== Front
Vis NeurosciVis. NeurosciVNSVisual Neuroscience0952-52381469-8714Cambridge University Press New York, USA 10.1017/S0952523816000092S095252381600009200009Brief CommunicationImaging the adult zebrafish cone mosaic using optical coherence tomography Huckenpahler et al.Imaging the zebrafish cone mosaic using OCTHUCKENPAHLER ALISON L. 1WILK MELISSA A. 1COOPER ROBERT F. 23MOEHRING FRANCIE 1LINK BRIAN A. 1CARROLL JOSEPH 14COLLERY ROSS F. 1*1 Department of Cell Biology, Neurobiology, and Anatomy, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin2 Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania3 Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania4 Department of Ophthalmology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin* Address correspondence to: Ross Collery, PhD, Department of Cell Biology, Neurobiology, and Anatomy; Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 W. Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226-0509. E-mail: snolan@example.com 33 E01106 2 2016 07 6 2016 © Cambridge University Press 20162016Cambridge University PressThis is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.Zebrafish (Danio rerio) provide many advantages as a model organism for studying ocular disease and development, and there is great interest in the ability to non-invasively assess their photoreceptor mosaic. Despite recent applications of scanning light ophthalmoscopy, fundus photography, and gonioscopy to in vivo imaging of the adult zebrafish eye, current techniques either lack accurate scaling information (limiting quantitative analyses) or require euthanizing the fish (precluding longitudinal analyses). Here we describe improved methods for imaging the adult zebrafish retina using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT). Transgenic fli1:eGFP zebrafish were imaged using the Bioptigen Envisu R2200 broadband source OCT with a 12-mm telecentric probe to measure axial length and a mouse retina probe to acquire retinal volume scans subtending 1.2 × 1.2 mm nominally. En face summed volume projections were generated from the volume scans using custom software that allows the user to create contours tailored to specific retinal layer(s) of interest. Following imaging, the eyes were dissected for ex vivo fluorescence microscopy, and measurements of blood vessel branch points were compared to those made from the en face OCT images to determine the OCT lateral scale as a function of axial length. Using this scaling model, we imaged the photoreceptor layer of five wild-type zebrafish and quantified the density and packing geometry of the UV cone submosaic. Our in vivo cone density measurements agreed with measurements from previously published histology values. The method presented here allows accurate, quantitative assessment of cone structure in vivo and will be useful for longitudinal studies of the zebrafish cone mosaics.

Keywords:
Optical coherence tomographyZebrafishCone mosaicRetina
==== Body
Introduction
Several characteristics of the zebrafish (Danio rerio) make it an ideal model for studying development and disease. The high homology between zebrafish and humans, along with the ease with which the zebrafish genome can be modified, allows for development and assessment of disease models that generally mimic human disease (Goldsmith & Jobin, 2012). In addition, zebrafish are easy to breed, mature quickly, produce large numbers of offspring, and are relatively inexpensive to maintain, making them an attractive option for many researchers (Pickart & Klee, 2014). Perhaps the most unique advantage to the zebrafish is its external development, which is highly conducive for studies of ocular development (Link & Collery, 2015). Of particular importance to studies of vision, the cone-rich retinas and diurnal vision of zebrafish complement the studies normally conducted in nocturnal, rod-dominant rodents (Allison et al., 2004; Chhetri et al., 2014).

Traditional confocal microscopy can be used with fluorescent markers and transgenic zebrafish lines to examine retinal structure and development both ex vivo (Li et al., 2012; Fraser et al., 2013; Raymond et al., 2014) and in vivo (Choi et al., 2010; Watanabe et al., 2010; Clark et al., 2011). Ex vivo studies of the zebrafish cone mosaic reveal a highly-organized tiling of four spectrally-distinct cone submosaics across the retina (Allison et al., 2010; Salbreux et al., 2012). Modification of a fluorescent stereomicroscope to include a custom gonioscopic lens has also enabled imaging of the cone mosaic in vivo (Duval et al., 2013), however, the images are of a relatively small retinal area and contain significant edge distortion. To cover a larger retinal area, several labs have adapted other ophthalmic imaging modalities for use in zebrafish. In one approach, Cheng et al. (2010) and Bell et al. (2014) used confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy to image the zebrafish retina in vivo. Fundus photography has also been used to image the optic disc, vasculature, and photoreceptors in the living zebrafish (Tschopp et al., 2010), though images of the photoreceptors with this method were not of high resolution. In addition, a major problem with many of these in vivo techniques is uncertainty regarding the lateral scale of the images, which limits the accuracy of any quantitative analysis.

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) permits non-invasive, high-resolution imaging of the eye in a variety of animal models (McLellan & Rasmussen, 2012). Compared to the previous techniques, OCT covers a wide field of view and has increased axial resolution (<5 microns). Recently, OCT has been applied to zebrafish to image the inner retina, lens, and anterior segment (Rao et al., 2006; Verma et al., 2007; Bailey et al., 2012; Weber et al., 2013; Collery et al., 2014). Given the interest in the photoreceptor layer, in particular its regenerative capacity (Wan & Goldman, 2016), we wanted to use OCT to image the zebrafish cone mosaic. The Bioptigen OCT built-in software uses a straight slab to generate en face projections, but due to the inherent curvature of the retina, the straight slab produces en face images that are not specific to a single layer of interest. In addition, since the probes used were designed for imaging the mouse retina, the lateral scale of images obtained in zebrafish is unknown (though recent work from Bailey et al. (2012) provided an OCT-histology correlation on the axial scaling of zebrafish OCT imagery). Here we sought to improve the method for generating en face projections, as well as determine the lateral scale of OCT images obtained in zebrafish. Using our methods, we demonstrate that quantitative data from OCT images of the photoreceptor mosaic agree with previously published histology data. Application of these methods will enable longitudinal, quantifiable imaging of zebrafish retinal structure in healthy and disease states.

Materials and methods
To determine scaling of OCT images, axial length and retinal imaging were performed on seven fli1:eGFP zebrafish, which have fluorescently labeled vascular endothelial cells (Lawson & Weinstein, 2002). Zebrafish were anesthetized with 0.016% tricaine methanesulfonate, positioned on the imaging stage, and secured using a clay restraint (Collery et al., 2014). Axial length was determined using the optical path length measured from images obtained using the Bioptigen Envisu R2200 SD-OCT (Bioptigen, Research Triangle Park, NC) with a broadband source (central wavelength 878.4 nm, 186.3 nm bandwidth; Superlum, Enterprise Park, Cork, Ireland) and a 12-mm telecentric lens as previously described (Collery et al., 2014). High-resolution images of the retina were obtained using the mouse retina probe. Volume scans were nominally 1.2 × 1.2 mm with isotropic sampling (750 A scans/B scan; 750 B scans). Raw OCT scans for retinal images were exported and processed using a custom OCT volume viewer (Java software, Oracle Corporation, Redwood Shores, CA), in which an adjustable contour is used to generate en face summed volume projection (SVP) images (Flatter et al., 2014; Scoles et al., 2016). For a given B-scan, 3–15 control points were added to the initial contour, where each control point is manually adjusted to follow the contour of the layer(s) of interest. Contour thickness was adjusted to the maximum width of the retinal sublamina of interest, typically 10–20 pixels. The contour was manually adjusted for each B-scan in the volume, correcting for local changes in layer topography and gross changes in axial position due to breathing artifacts. The OCT volume viewing code is available on request. Multiple en face images can be generated for each OCT volume, resulting in images of different retinal features (e.g., inner retinal vasculature and photoreceptor mosaic).

Following OCT imaging, the fli1:eGFP fish were terminally anesthetized and decapitated, and heads were fixed in 4% formaldehyde overnight. The eyes were enucleated and the anterior segment removed from the eyecup. The eyecups were imaged with a Nikon Eclipse E600FN confocal fluorescent microscope with a Nikon D-eclipse C1 camera attachment (Nikon, Tokyo) to view the fluorescently labeled vasculature of the retina. Of the 14 eyes imaged, nine eyes (from seven fish) had minimal post-mortem distortion and were included for subsequent analysis. From microscopy images, the distance between blood vessel branch points was measured in microns using Nikon's EZ-C1 3.90 Free Viewer, with a minimum of three measurements per eye. Accuracy of the fluorescent microscopy measurements was confirmed by imaging a calibration slide at the same magnification. Identical blood vessel branch point measurements were made on the en face OCT images using ImageJ (Schneider et al., 2012). The ratio of ex vivo (microns) to in vivo (pixels) distance was calculated for each corresponding measurement and averaged for each eye. This micron/pixel ratio was used to calculate the actual scan width by multiplying it by the number of A scans/B scan (the scan width in pixels). The ratio of the actual scan width to the nominal scan width (calculated based on the known scan angle and assumed mouse optics) was then plotted against axial length to determine lateral scaling of OCT images as a function of eye length.

An additional five wild type zebrafish were imaged following the protocol above to gather data on the peripheral photoreceptor mosaic, which was defined as 20–50 microns from the optic nerve and corresponded to the transition from disorganized embryonic growth to crystalline adult growth. En face images were generated using the OCT volume viewer (Flatter et al., 2014; Scoles et al., 2016). Contours were positioned at the most anterior photoreceptor layer to generate en face images of the UV cone layer and at the most posterior photoreceptor layer to generate en face images of the red/green cone layer (Branchek & Bremiller, 1984). Cones were identified using a semi-automated algorithm with manual correction (Garrioch et al., 2012). Density and mosaic geometry were assessed from the resultant cone coordinates using a custom program as previously described (Cooper et al., 2016).

Results
Using the custom volume viewer, distinct sublaminas are easily visualized and are uniform across the image. Fig. 1 illustrates representative SVP image quality that can be obtained using the custom OCT volume viewer compared to the built-in software. By creating a custom contour (Fig. 1B), we can generate SVP images of a single retinal layer (UV cone layer shown in Fig. 1D), compared to the corresponding image generated from a flat slab as done with the built-in Bioptigen software (Fig. 1A and 1C). The custom software generates significantly improved images compared to commercially available software.Fig. 1. Visualization of the zebrafish cone mosaic using en face volume projection images. (A, C) The straight slab method in the native Bioptigen analysis software results in an en face volume projection with different retinal layers included at different locations within the volume, thus the cone mosaic is only visible in some parts of the en face image. (B, D) Using a custom contour that follows a single outer hyper-reflective band results in an en face projection of that layer, in this case the UV cone mosaic.



Using en face images generated at the level above the nerve fiber layer, we were able to identify distinct branch points in the retinal blood vessels (Fig. 2A). The corresponding ex vivo measurements are shown in Fig. 2B. The ratio of the actual scan width to the nominal scan width (scaling coefficient) was plotted as a function of axial length (Fig. 2C). There is a significant positive correlation between the scaling coefficient and axial length (r = 0.98, P < 0.0001; Pearson's correlation), such that as axial length increases, the actual retinal area covered by the scan increases. A linear fit to these data provides a mathematical formula for calculating the scaling coefficient (s) for any zebrafish OCT based on axial length. This can be calculated as follows: 1  where A is the axial length in millimeters, and b and r are fixed values 0.2187 and 0.4059, respectively. It should be noted that this relationship has been adjusted to account for differences in scan settings and is therefore independent of the field of view (FOV), number of A scans/B scan, or number of B scans used.Fig. 2. Deriving the lateral scale of in vivo OCT images of the fli1:eGFP zebrafish retina. (A) En face image generated by positioning the custom contour within the retinal nerve fiber layer. Measurements (in pixels) were taken between multiple blood vessel branch points (white dots). (B) Corresponding ex vivo fluorescent microscopy image of the same retina, with measurements (in µm) taken between the same blood vessel branch points in (A). The OCT:microscopy measurements were averaged for each eye and used to determine the size of the OCT scan in µm. A scaling coefficient for each scan was calculated as the ratio between the actual size of the OCT scan to the nominal OCT scan size (in this case, 1200 µm). (C) The scaling coefficient for each scan was plotted against the axial length for that eye and fit with a linear model. Error bars represent one standard deviation for each eye.



Wild-type zebrafish were imaged and analyzed as described above for the fli1-eGFP fish. Using the scaling formula [eqn (1)] and the axial length, we determined the size of the OCT scan for each eye. The en face images of the cone mosaic produced with this method show similar packing arrangements and photoreceptor tiering that have been previously observed ex vivo (Allison et al., 2010; Tarboush et al., 2012; Ramsey & Perkins, 2013). Contours generated at the innermost photoreceptor layer (corresponding to the UV photoreceptor layer) (Fig. 3A) and the outermost photoreceptor layer (corresponding to the red/green photoreceptor layer) (Fig. 3B), produce en face images with non-overlapping cone structures (Fig. 3C and 3D). A false color overlay (Fig. 3E and 3F) shows that these separate photoreceptor layers are interleaved with one another as seen in histology (Salbreux et al., 2012). We are able to observe the disorganized packing near the optic nerve, made up of cones that formed during larval development (Fig. 4C and 4E), and the crystalline organization of the cones that developed as the fish transitioned to adulthood (Fig. 4B and 4D). Analysis of the peripheral UV cone sublamina shows a highly crystalline photoreceptor mosaic with 67.6 ± 11.0% of UV cones displaying 6-sided geometry. Within the images analyzed, we observed regions of even greater regularity, with some patches of the mosaic having 96% six-sided Voronoi cells; these patches were as large as 0.09 mm2. Average UV cone density was found to be 19,557 ± 4,716 cones/mm2, with values ranging from 12,593 to 25,756 cones/mm2. These values agree with previously published wild-type histology values ranging from about 6,000 to 23,000 cones/mm2 (Allison et al., 2010; Salbreux et al., 2012; Duval et al., 2013; Raymond et al., 2014).Fig. 3. Visualization of the UV and red/green photoreceptor layers. (A) B scan with contour placed at the UV layer and (B) the same B scan with the contour moved to the red/green layer. The resultant images generated produce en face images of (C) the UV cone layer and (D) the red/green cone layer. A false-colored overlay (E) of these two layers showing the alternating/interleaved geometry of these photoreceptor sublamina. Scale bar = 200 µm. (F) A cropped region shows the interleaved red/green and UV cone mosaics.

Fig. 4. Regional differences in the topography of the zebrafish cone mosaic. (A) Montage of five en face images of the adult zebrafish UV cone sublamina. Scale bar = 200 µm. Cropped images of the (B) peripheral adult growth and (C) parapapillary larval growth, showing differences in the percentage of six-sided cells within the cone mosaic. The corresponding Voronoi diagrams indicate the number of sides for each Voronoi cell (purple = 4; light blue = 5; green = 6; yellow = 7; red = 8; dark blue = 9). (D) The peripheral adult growth (blue box in A) shows a regular, crystalline mosaic, indicated by the high number of six-sided Voronoi cells (green cells). (E) In contrast, the parapapillary larval growth (orange box in A) shows disorganized, random packing.



Discussion
Here we present a method for deriving accurate, quantitative measures of the zebrafish cone mosaic. The main improvements of our approach include utilizing a custom contour method to generate en face images from the OCT volumes as well as deriving accurate estimates of the lateral scale of the in vivo images acquired using this system. Individual differences in axial length (which affect optical magnification) have been shown to affect the accuracy of OCT measurements in the human retina (Odell et al., 2011; Parthasarathy & Bhende, 2015). In animals, correction of the lateral magnification of OCT images in the rat eye has been done by developing a schematic model eye (Lozano & Twa, 2013), and correction of the axial scale of OCT images in the zebrafish eye has been done using correlative histology (Bailey et al., 2012); however, to our knowledge, lateral scaling has not previously been determined for zebrafish. It should be noted that our method applies only to this specific OCT system (Bioptigen OCT with mouse probe), and a similar one-time calibration would be needed to determine scaling for different OCT systems. As a result of our methodology, we were able to make quantitative in vivo measurements of the adult zebrafish cone mosaic.

The current study had some limitations. First, analysis of the cone mosaic was limited to the UV sublamina, which has larger cones that are spaced farther apart than the other sublamina (Robinson et al., 1993). Although the red/green (L/M) cone sublamina can be imaged using this method (Huckenpahler et al., 2016), the small size and compact spacing are sometimes below the resolution of the OCT. Similarly, the blue (S) cone sublamina is infrequently distinguished with our current system. System improvements such as using a bore designed specifically for the zebrafish eye, or employing adaptive optics OCT (AO-OCT) for imaging (Jian et al., 2013; Levine et al., 2013) could improve the resolution. A second limitation is that the creation of custom contours for en face images is a time-consuming process, as the contours are adjusted for each B scan within the volume. Combining our en face method with automated segmentation algorithms (Garvin et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2012; Chiu et al., 2013) could significantly improve processing time. A final limitation is the inability to combine fluorescent labeling with this imaging approach, though molecular labels that manipulate light scattering, such as gold nanoparticles, have been successfully used with OCT (Hayashi et al., 2009; de la Zerda et al., 2015). Such tools may improve the ability to label specific cell populations within the OCT volumes (and thus the en face images).

Despite these limitations, OCT permits non-invasive, high resolution imaging of the eye in a variety of animal models (McLellan & Rasmussen, 2012). Although OCT has been largely relegated to measuring retinal thickness, the ability to generate accurately scaled en face images increases the application of this method for structural and functional studies. In humans, OCT en face images are used to identify and track retinal lesions and to monitor disease progression (Sallo et al., 2012; Ferrara et al., 2014; Flatter et al., 2014; Mohammad et al., 2014; Hood et al., 2015). Studies in frogs and mice have applied en face imaging to study phototropic changes and dysfunction in photoreceptors (Zhang et al., 2012; Lu et al., 2013) and ex vivo en face imaging has been used to study photoreceptor development in zebrafish (Mitchell et al., 2015). The in vivo nature of the method described here permits longitudinal assessment of the mosaic in the same animal over time and we foresee this technique having wide application to developmental biology, drug discovery, and disease modeling. We anticipate that researchers would likely use this technique to study longitudinal changes to the cone mosaic in normal development, or in response to disease. However, given the popularity of the zebrafish for drug screening, we also envision a more clinical application where OCT imaging is used to monitor drug oculotoxicity or efficacy prior to FDA approval. Moving forward, applying these imaging methods and robust analysis tools in a variety of disease models could significantly improve our understanding of retinal structure and disease.

Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Christine Skumatz, Christopher Langlo, and Joe Vance for assistance with this study. Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Eye Institute under award numbers R01EY016060, T32EY014537, P30EY001931 and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences under award number T32GM080202. This investigation was conducted in a facility constructed with support from the Research Facilities Improvement Program, Grant Number C06RR016511, from the National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Additional support was provided by an unrestricted departmental grant from Research to Prevent Blindness.
==== Refs
References
Allison W.T. , Barthel L.K. , Skebo K.M. , Takechi M. , Kawamura S.  & Raymond P.A.  (2010 ). Ontogeny of cone photoreceptor mosaics in zebrafish . Journal of Comparative Neurology 
518 , 4182 –4195 .20878782 
Allison W.T. , Haimberger T.J. , Hawryshyn C.W.  & Temple S.E.  (2004 ). Visual pigment composition in zebrafish: Evidence for a rhodopsin-porphyropsin interchange system . Visual Neuroscience 
21 , 945 –952 .15733349 
Bailey T.J. , Davis D.H. , Vance J.E.  & Hyde D.R.  (2012 ). Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography as a noninvasive method to assess damaged and regenerating adult zebrafish retinas . Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 
53 , 3126 –3138 .22499984 
Bell B.A. , Xie J. , Yuan A. , Kaul C. , Hollyfield J.G.  & Anand-Apte B.  (2014 ). Retinal vasculature of adult zebrafish: In vivo imaging using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy . Experimental Eye Research 
129 , 107 –118 .25447564 
Branchek T.  & Bremiller R.  (1984 ). The development of photoreceptors in the zebrafish, Brachydanio rerio. I. Structure . Journal of Comparative Neurology 
224 , 107 –115 .6715574 
Cheng Y.H. , Yu J.Y. , Wu H.H. , Huang B.J.  & Chu S.W.  (2010 ). Spectral ophthalmoscopy based on supercontinuum In Proceedings of SPIE , ed. Farkas D.L. , Nicolau D.V.  & Leif R.C. , pp. 75680F 
San Francisco, CA : SPIE .
Chhetri J. , Jacobson G.  & Gueven N.  (2014 ). Zebrafish- on the move towards ophthalmological research . Eye 
28 , 367 –380 .24503724 
Chiu S.J. , Lokhnygina Y. , Dubis A.M. , Dubra A. , Carroll J. , Izatt J.A.  & Farsiu S.  (2013 ). Automatic cone photoreceptor segmentation using graph theory and dynamic programming . Biomedical Optics Express 
4 , 924 –937 .23761854 
Choi J.H. , Law M.Y. , Chien C.B. , Link B.A.  & Wong R.O.  (2010 ). In vivo development of dendritic orientation in wild-type and mislocalized retinal ganglion cells . Neural Development 
5 , 29 .21044295 
Clark B.S. , Winter M. , Cohen A.R.  & Link B.A.  (2011 ). Generation of Rab-based transgenic lines for in vivo studies of endosome biology in zebrafish . Developmental Dynamics 
240 , 2452 –2465 .21976318 
Collery R.F. , Veth K.N. , Dubis A.M. , Carroll J.  & Link B.A.  (2014 ). Rapid, accurate, and non-invasive measurement of zebrafish axial length and other eye dimensions using SD-OCT allows longitudinal analysis of myopia and emmetropization . PLoS One 
9 , e110699 .25334040 
Cooper R.F. , Wilk M.A. , Tarima S.  & Carroll J.  (2016 ). Evaluating descriptive metrics of the human cone mosaic . Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 
57 (7 ), 2992 –3001 .27273598 
de la Zerda A. , Prabhulkar S. , Perez V.L. , Ruggeri M. , Paranjape A.S. , Habte F. , Gambhir S.S.  & Awdeh R.M.  (2015 ). Optical coherence contrast imaging using gold nanorods in living mice eyes . Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology 
43 , 358 –366 .24533647 
Duval M.G. , Chung H. , Lehmann O.J.  & Allison W.T.  (2013 ). Longitudinal fluorescent observation of retinal degeneration and regeneration in zebrafish using fundus lens imaging . Molecular Vision 
19 , 1082 –1095 .23734077 
Ferrara D. , Mohler K.J. , Waheed N. , Adhi M. , Liu J.J. , Grulkowski I. , Kraus M.F. , Baumal C. , Hornegger J. , Fujimoto J.G.  & Duker J.S.  (2014 ). En face enhanced-depth swept-source optical coherence tomography features of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy . Ophthalmology 
121 , 719 –726 .24289918 
Flatter J.A. , Cooper R.F. , Dubow M.J. , Pinhas A. , Singh R.S. , Kapur R. , Shah N. , Walsh R.D. , Hong S.H. , Weinberg D.V. , Stepien K.E. , Wirostko W.J. , Robison S. , Dubra A. , Rosen R.B. , Connor T.B. Jr. & Carroll J.  (2014 ). Outer retinal structure after closed-globe blunt ocular trauma . Retina 
34 , 2133 –2146 .24752010 
Fraser B. , Duval M.G. , Wang H.  & Allison W.T.  (2013 ). Regeneration of cone photoreceptors when cell ablation is primarily restricted to a particular cone subtype . PLoS One 
8 , e55410 .23383182 
Garrioch R. , Langlo C. , Dubis A.M. , Cooper R.F. , Dubra A.  & Carroll J.  (2012 ). Repeatability of in vivo parafoveal cone density and spacing measurements . Optometry and Vision Science 
89 , 632 –643 .22504330 
Garvin M.K. , Abramoff M.D. , Wu X. , Russell S.R. , Burns T.L.  & Sonka M.  (2009 ). Automated 3-D intraretinal segmentation of macular spectral-domain optical coherence tomography images . IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 
28 , 1436 –1447 .19278927 
Goldsmith J.R.  & Jobin C.  (2012 ). Think small: Zebrafish as a model system of human pathology . Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology , e817341 .
Hayashi A. , Naseri A. , Pennesi M.E.  & de Juan E.J.  (2009 ). Subretinal delivery of immunoglobulin G with gold nanoparticles in the rabbit eye . Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology 
53 , 249 –256 .19484444 
Hood D.C. , Fortune B. , Mavrommatis M.A. , Reynaud J. , Ramachandran R. , Ritch R. , Rosen R.B. , Muhammad H. , Dubra A.  & Chui T.Y.  (2015 ). Details of glaucomatous damage are better seen on OCT en face images than on OCT retinal nerve fiber layer thickness maps . Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 
56 , 6208 –6216 .26426403 
Huckenpahler A. , Wilk M.A. , Cooper R.F. , Carroll J. , Link B.  & Collery R.F.  (2016 ). Imaging the adult zebrafish cone photoreceptor mosaic using optical coherence tomography (OCT) In ARVO Annual Meeting , p. 2196 
Seattle, WA : Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology .
Jian Y. , Zawadzki R.J.  & Sarunic M.V.  (2013 ). Adaptive optics optical coherence tomography for in vivo mouse retinal imaging . Journal of Biomedical Optics 
18 , 56007 .23644903 
Lawson N.D.  & Weinstein B.M.  (2002 ). In vivo imaging of embryonic vascular development using transgenic zebrafish . Developmental Biology 
248 , 307 –318 .12167406 
Levine E. , Zawadzki R.J. , Cheng H. , Simon S. , Pugh E.  & Burns M.  (2013 ). Early indications of pending degeneration in a mouse model of photoreceptor light damage . Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 
54 , 4179 .
Li Y.N. , Tsujimura T. , Kawamura S.  & Dowling J.E.  (2012 ). Bipolar cell-photoreceptor connectivity in the zebrafish (Danio rerio) retina . Journal of Comparative Neurology 
520 , 3786 –3802 .22907678 
Link B.A.  & Collery R.F.  (2015 ). Zebrafish models of retinal disease . Annual Review of Vision Science 
1 , 125 –153 .
Lozano D.C.  & Twa M.D.  (2013 ). Development of a rat schematic eye from in vivo biometry and the correction of lateral magnification in SD-OCT imaging . Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 
54 , 6446 –6455 .23989191 
Lu R. , Levy A.M. , Zhang Q. , Pittler S.J.  & Yao X.  (2013 ). Dynamic near-infrared imaging reveals transient phototropic change in retinal rod photoreceptors . Journal of Biomedical Optics 
18 , 106013 .24165739 
McLellan G.J.  & Rasmussen C.A.  (2012 ). Optical coherence tomography for the evaluation of retinal and optic nerve morphology in animal subjects: Practical considerations . Veterinary Ophthalmology 
15 , 13 –28 .22805095 
Mitchell D.M. , Stevens C.B. , Frey R.A. , Hunter S.S. , Ashino R. , Kawamura S.  & Stenkamp D.L.  (2015 ). Retinoic acid signalling regulates differential expression of the tandemly-duplicated long wavelength-sensitive cone opsin genes in zebrafish . PLoS Genetics 
11 , e1005483 .26296154 
Mohammad F. , Wanek J. , Zelkha R. , Lim J.I. , Chen J.  & Shahidi M.  (2014 ). A method for en face OCT imaging of subretinal fluid in age-related macular degeneration . Journal of Ophthalmology 
2014 , 720243 .25478209 
Odell D. , Dubis A.M. , Lever J.F. , Stepien K.E.  & Carroll J.  (2011 ). Assessing errors inherent in OCT-derived macular thickness maps . Journal of Ophthalmology 
2011 , 692574 .21869920 
Parthasarathy M.K.  & Bhende M.  (2015 ). Effect of ocular magnification on macular measurements made using spectral domain optical coherence tomography . Indian Journal of Ophthalmology 
63 , 427 –431 .26139805 
Pickart M.A.  & Klee E.W.  (2014 ). Zebrafish approaches enhance the translational research tackle box . Translational Research 
163 , 65 –303-766-0918 
Ramsey M.  & Perkins B.D.  (2013 ). Basal bodies exhibit polarized positioning in zebrafish cone photoreceptors . Journal of Comparative Neurology 
521 , 1803 –1816 .23171982 
Rao K.D. , Verma Y. , Patel H.S.  & Gupta P.K.  (2006 ). Non-invasive ophthalmic imaging of adult zebrafish eye using optical coherence tomography . Current Science 
90 , 1506 –1510 .
Raymond P.A. , Colvin S.M. , Jabeen Z. , Nagashima M. , Barthel L.K. , Hadidjojo J. , Popova L. , Pejaver V.R.  & Lubensky D.K.  (2014 ). Patterning the cone mosaic array in zebrafish retina requires specification of ultraviolet-sensitive cones . PLoS One 
9 , e85325 .24465536 
Robinson J. , Schmitt E.A. , Harosi F.I. , Reece R.J.  & Dowling J.E.  (1993 ). Zebrafish ultraviolet visual pigment: Absorption spectrum, sequence, and localization . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 
90 , 6009 –6012 .8327475 
Salbreux G. , Barthel L.K. , Raymond P.A.  & Lubensky D.K.  (2012 ). Coupling mechanical deformations and planar cell polarity to create regular patterns in the zebrafish retina . PLoS Computational Biology 
8 , e1002618 .22936893 
Sallo F.B. , Peto T. , Egan C. , Wolf-Schnurrbusch U.E. , Clemons T.E. , Gillies M.C. , Pauleikhoff D. , Rubin G.S. , Chew E.Y. , Bird A.C.  & MacTel Study Group . (2012 ). The IS/OS junction layer in the natural history of type 2 idiopathic macular telangiectasia . Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 
53 , 7889 –7895 .23092925 
Schneider C.A. , Rasband W.S.  & Eliceiri K.W.  (2012 ). NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis . Nature Methods 
9 , 671 –675 .22930834 
Scoles D. , Flatter J.A. , Cooper R.F. , Langlo C.S. , Robison S. , Neitz M. , Weinberg D.V. , Pennesi M.E. , Han D.P. , Dubra A.  & Carroll J.  (2016 ). Assessing photoreceptor structure associated with ellipsoid zone disruptions visualized with optical coherence tomography . Retina 
36 , 91 –103 .26166796 
Tarboush R. , Chapman G.B.  & Connaughton V.P.  (2012 ). Ultrastructure of the distal retina of the adult zebrafish, Danio rerio . Tissue and Cell 
44 , 264 –279 .22608306 
Tschopp M. , Takamiya M. , Cerveny K.L. , Gestri G. , Biehlmaier O. , Wilson S.W. , Strähle U.  & Neuhauss S.C.  (2010 ). Funduscopy in adult zebrafish and its application to isolate mutant strains with ocular defects . PLoS One 
5 , e15427 .21079775 
Verma Y. , Rao K.D. , Suresh M.K. , Patel H.S.  & Gupta P.K.  (2007 ). Measurement of gradient refractive index profile of crystalline lens of fisheye in vivo using optical coherence tomography . Applied Physics B: Lasers and Optics 
87 , 607 –610 .
Wan J.  & Goldman D.  (2016 ). Retina regeneration in zebrafish . Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 
40 , 41 –47 .27281280 
Wang J.L. , Kardon R.H. , Kupersmith M.J.  & Garvin M.K.  (2012 ). Automated quantification of volumetric optic disc swelling in papilledema using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography . Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 
53 , 4069 –4075 .22599584 
Watanabe K. , Nishimura Y. , Oka T. , Nomoto T. , Kon T. , Shintou T. , Hirano M. , Shimada Y. , Umemoto N. , Kuroyanagi J. , Wang Z. , Zhang Z. , Nishimura N. , Miyazaki T. , Imamura T.  & Tanaka T.  (2010 ). In vivo imaging of zebrafish retinal cells using fluorescent coumarin derivatives . BMC Neuroscience 
11 , 116 .20843315 
Weber A. , Hochmann S. , Cimalla P. , Gärtner M. , Kuscha V. , Hans S. , Geffarth M. , Kaslin J. , Koch E.  & Brand M.  (2013 ). Characterization of light lesion paradigms and optical coherence tomography as tools to study adult retina regeneration in zebrafish . PLoS One 
8 , e80483 .24303018 
Zhang Q.X. , Lu R.W. , Curcio C.A.  & Yao X.C.  (2012 ). In vivo confocal intrinsic optical signal identification of localized retinal dysfunction . Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 
53 , 8139 –8145 .23150616


{'source': 'PubMedDataset'}