
==== Front
PLoS BiolPLoS BiolpbioplosbiolPLoS Biology1544-91731545-7885Public Library of Science San Francisco, USA 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020170Correspondence and Other CommunicationsCell BiologyScience PolicyEthics as Our Guide CorrespondenceCook Michael 6 2004 15 6 2004 15 6 2004 2 6 e170Copyright: © 2004 Michael Cook.2004This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
Reason as Our Guide 

Beyond Therapy 

Scientists and Bioethics Councils 

A Voice for Research, a Voice for Patients 

Taking the Stem Cell Debate to the Public 

Ethereal Ethics 
In response to the Blackburn and Rowley essay on the President's Council on Bioethics, several thought-provoking opinions on ethical challenges in biomedical research are expressed by prominent stakeholders
==== Body
Blackburn and Rowley's (2004) criticism of a report on embryonic stem cell research from the President's Council on Bioethics (2004) is puzzling. Where is the bioethics? The nub of their complaint is that some details of the report have been partisan and have distorted 'the potential of biomedical research and the motivation of some of its researchers'. No doubt their quibbles are well-founded, as every committee report is a compromise.

However, it does not follow that if the benefits of embryo stem cell research had been presented more persuasively and in greater detail, then the case for 'non-commercial, federal, peer-reviewed funding' would be unassailable. Such a view appears to be based squarely on a utilitarian view of the moral status of embryos: that the good flowing from destructive research outweighs the evil of embryo destruction. Far from being a neutral scientific analysis, this expresses a commitment to the proposition that biomedical progress is more important than the defence of human life.

If twentieth century philosophy of science has taught us anything, it is that the aspiration to pure scientific objectivity is a dangerous illusion. Research programs always embody philosophical and moral assumptions that must be openly defended. If Blackburn and Rowley want government support for embryo stem cell research, they must justify their bioethical approach and not hide behind a smokescreen of indignation over Blackburn's unwilling departure from the Council.

BioEdge, Australasian Bioethics Information, Sandy Bay, Tasmania, Australia

E-mail: stoutdonna@example.net
==== Refs
References
Blackburn E  Rowley J   Reason as our guide PLoS Biol 2004 2 e815-73-0671/journal.pbio.0020116 15024408 
President's Council on Bioethics Monitoring stem cell research 2004 Available at http://bioethics.gov/reports/stemcell/index.html  via the Internet. Accessed 24 March 2004


{'source': 'PubMedDataset'}