
==== Front
BJR Case Rep
British Institute of Radiology
bjrcr
BJR | case reports
2055-7159 The British Institute of Radiology. 

BJRCR-D-20-00016
10.1259/bjrcr.20200016
Case Report
bjrcrBJRCRgas-abdGastrointestinal and abdominalctCTGiant villous adenoma of the sigmoid colon: an unusual cause of homogeneous, segmental bowel wall thickening
Giant Villous AdenomaSacks et alSacks Jeffrey 1,thorntonteresa@example.com Atlas Seymour 1,thorntonteresa@example.com Enno Alar thorntonteresa@example.com Santos Leonardo thorntonteresa@example.com Humphries Jeremy thorntonteresa@example.com https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5007-9763Kirwan Alexander thorntonteresa@example.com 1 Department of Radiology, Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
2 University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
3 Department of Pathology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
4 Department of Gastroenterology, Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
5 Department of Radiology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Address correspondence to: Dr Alexander Kirwan. E-mail: thorntonteresa@example.com
01 12 2020 
16 6 2020 
6 4 2020001619 1 2020 26 5 2020 29 5 2020 © 2020 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology2020The AuthorsThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.Colonic adenomas are commonly encountered lesions that are a precursor of colorectal cancer. Of these, villous adenomas are a rarer, more advanced subtype that are larger in size than tubular adenomas and have a higher risk of malignant transformation. We present a patient with a giant villous adenoma of the sigmoid colon identified on CT as homogeneous segmental bowel wall thickening.
==== Body
Clinical presentation
A 66-year-old female of Vietnamese background presented to our institution on numerous occasions over a period of 1 year with symptoms including diarrhoea, back pain, suprapubic pain, dehydration and rectal bleeding. Her physical examination was normal. She was hyponatraemic with a blood sodium level of 122 mmol l−1 (135–145 mmol l−1). Her potassium level was normal. Her haemoglobin was mildly decreased at 99 g l−1 (120–150 g l−1) and her carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was elevated, 5.7 mg/mL (normal <3 mg/mL). Other tumour markers were negative and inflammatory markers were not significantly elevated.

Investigations
A CT scan was performed pre-i.v. and post-i.v. contrast and with an oral contrast agent. The post-i.v. contrast scan was obtained in the portal venous phase. Circumferential bowel wall thickening, without proximal bowel obstruction, was demonstrated involving a segment of the mid-sigmoid colon measuring 150 mm in length (Figure 1). The thickened bowel wall demonstrated homogeneous density and enhancement, with a mean density of 42 HU pre-contrast and 76 HU post-contrast. There were no inflammatory changes in the perisigmoid fat, no evidence of loco-regional or distant lymphadenopathy, no ascites and no liver lesions.

Figure 1. CT abdomen demonstrating segmental wall thickening of homogeneous density in the sigmoid colon. Displayed are post-i.v. and oral contrast axial (a) and coronal (b) plane images, compared with non-contrast axial (c) and coronal (d) plane images

Colonoscopy demonstrated a large frond-like, circumferential, villous, partially obstructing sigmoid colon mass with no active haemorrhage. It was estimated to measure 50 mm in length (Figure 2). Biopsies demonstrated fragments of a tubulo-villous adenoma with low-grade dysplasia and no evidence of malignancy.

Figure 2. Colonoscopy images of the distal (a) and mid (b) sigmoid colon with large, frond-like, circumferential mass

Differential diagnosis
Apparent thickening of the bowel wall may be considered normal, depending on the degree of luminal distension, with measurements in the colon varying from 1 to 5mm.1,2 Pathological thickening of the colonic wall has a broad differential and includes neoplastic, inflammatory, infectious and traumatic causes. The extent of thickening can be further described as focal (<50 mm), segmental (60–400 mm) and diffuse (>400 mm). In addition, the symmetry of thickening, contrast enhancement and the presence of pericolonic abnormalities should be evaluated..2–4

For patients demonstrating segmental bowel wall thickening, benign causes are more common, with ischaemia, inflammatory or infective colitis the key differentials. Colorectal adenocarcinomas more commonly present as focal thickening. Lymphoma, although less common, can present as both focal and segmental thickening..2–4

Treatment
Laparoscopic high anterior resection of the rectum and distal sigmoid colon was performed, achieving macroscopic clearance. There was complete symptomatic resolution and no complications.

Histology demonstrated a rectosigmoid polyp with a length of 165 mm (Figure 3) and villous architecture (Figure 4) involving the entire mucosal surface, but sparing the muscularis propria. Generalised low-grade dysplasia (Figure 4) with an occasional focus of high-grade dysplasia of 2–3 mm was present. There were no areas of invasive malignancy and 19 lymph nodes were identified without evidence of malignancy.

Figure 3. Macroscopic specimen of the rectosigmoid lesion. Note the broad cauliflower-like appearance

Figure 4. Microscopic sections of the villous adenoma. Low-power X10 view (a) and high-power view X20 (b) views demonstrating frond-like villous architecture with low-grade dysplasia

Discussion
Colorectal cancer is among the most common causes of cancer mortality in Western populations.5,6 Lesions are typically slow growing, beginning as a benign adenoma before undergoing malignant transformation over approximately 7–10 years; the adenomacarcinoma sequence.1,7 Identifying and removing the adenoma early can decrease the incidence of adenocarcinoma.1,5,7

Adenomas can be categorised into tubular and villous, 10% of which are villous. Villous adenomas have been described as broad, shaggy lesions with a cauliflower-like surface.5 They are frond-like and are comprised of a core of fibrovascular lamina propria lined with mucin-secreting columnar epithelium that, in larger lesions, can secrete copious quantities of mucinous fluid.1,5,8 Adenoma size is one of the most important markers for the risk of malignant transformation and, based on size alone, are considered advanced if they are larger than 10 mm.7 Villous adenomas are also larger in size than other polyps, often more than 20 mm, and can grow to greater than 100 mm. This results in an advanced subpopulation of adenomas that are at higher risk of malignant transformation.1,5,9 Areas of dysplasia and malignancy occur sporadically throughout these lesions, requiring surgical resection rather than biopsy.3,10

Although villous adenomas are usually asymptomatic, larger lesions can produce mucus secretion, diarrhoea, obstructive symptoms and, rarely, rectal bleeding.8,11 Villous adenomas may secrete water, sodium and potassium, felt to be secretagogue-mediated via prostaglandin E212 and first described by McKittrick and Wheelock in 1954.13 Secretory villous adenomas that are larger, ranging in size from 70 to 180 mm, are associated with depletion syndrome due to a greater surface area for secretion.12 Those located distally in the colon also have less normal mucosa available for fluid resorption. This is consistent with our patient's presentation, with evidence of diarrhoea and electrolyte depletion in the context of a large distal tumour.

Double contrast barium enema was traditionally used for radiological screening of patients with colorectal neoplasms. The findings of villous adenoma have been well described, demonstrating a sessile filling defect with a reticular or granular mucosal surface pattern. It has also been described as having the appearance of a soap-bubble. This results from wisps of barium extending between the fronds of the tumour, replacing the mucus normally present..8,14–17

CT has played an increasing role, however, most lesions seen on CT are detected incidentally.1 The literature regarding the CT appearances of villous adenoma is sparse. The first reported findings described a large contrast-enhancing mucosal-based mass with soft tissue density on its serosal aspect and near water density (3.9 HU) on its mucosal aspect.15 A corrugated appearance from an irregular surface coated by oral contrast was described. Subsequent descriptions include a variegated, gyral contrast enhancement pattern with low attenuation areas of 15–17 HU8 and an eccentrically located lesion with homogeneous water density occupying more than 50% of the mucosal surface of the mass.1,9 The low-density areas are due to the presence of mucus trapped within the lesion. Current recommendations suggest that oral contrast should be avoided, as coating the mucosal surface with barium can obscure these low density regions.1,8,9,15

The CT appearance of our patient's lesion is unique when compared with previous descriptions. Although the length of greater than 150 mm is within the range described for a villous adenoma, circumferential rather than eccentric bowel wall thickening and homogeneous rather than heterogeneous and gyral enhancement are new findings. This unusual CT appearance with no similar description found in the literature should be considered additional features to those described previously and also included in the differential diagnosis of segmental bowel wall thickening in the colon.

Learning points
Villous adenoma is an unusual cause for homogeneous segmental colonic wall thickening and should be included in the differential diagnosis

Diarrhoea and abdominal pain with bowel wall thickening and no inflammatory changes should raise the possibility of a villous adenoma.

Informed Consent: Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report, including accompanying images.

Jeffrey Sacks and Seymour Atlas have contributed equally to this study and should be considered as co-first authors.
==== Refs
REFERENCES
1. Thoeni R  
Polyps and Colon Cancer : Gore R. M , Levine M. S  , Textbook of Gastrointestinal Radiology . 4th edn 
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania ; 2015  , 1027 –73
(authors) Chapter 59, pp .
2. Fernandes T , Oliveira MI , Castro R , Araújo B , Viamonte B , Cunha R  
Bowel wall thickening at CT: simplifying the diagnosis
. Insights Imaging 
2014 ; 5 : 195 –208
. doi: 10.1007/s13244-013-0308-y 24407923 
3. Lubner MG , Menias CO , Johnson RJ , Gaballah AH , Shaaban A , Elsayes KM , et al 
Villous gastrointestinal tumors: multimodality imaging with histopathologic correlation
. Radiographics 
2018 ; ; 38 : 1370 –84
2018 . doi: 10.1148/rg.762.279.3320 30059275 
4. Gore RM  
Colon: Differential Diagnosis : Gore R. M , Levine M. S  , Textbook of Gastrointestinal Radiology . 4th edn 
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania ; 2015 
1144 , -–51
(authors) Chapter 64, pp .
5. Rubin R  
The Gastrointestinal Tract : Rubin R , Strayer D. S , Rubin E  , : Rubin's Pathology: Clinicopathologic Foundations of Medicine . 6th edn 
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania ; 2012 Chapter 13 (authors) .
6. Levine MS  
Rubesin se Laufer I, Herlinger H (2000) diagnosis of colorectal neoplasms at double-contrast barium enema examination
. Radiology 
2000 ; 216 ;, (Issue 1 )Vol. .
7. Strum WB  
Colorectal adenomas
. N Engl J Med 
2016 ; 374 : 1065 –75
. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1513581 26981936 
8. Smith TR , Fine SW , Jones JG  
Ct appearance of some colonic villous tumors
. American Journal of Roentgenology 
2001 ; 177 : 91 –3
. doi: 10.2214/ajr.177.1.1770091 11418404 
9. Kim DH , Pickhardt PJ , Taylor AJ  
Characteristics of advanced adenomas detected at CT colonographic screening: implications for appropriate polyp size thresholds for polypectomy versus surveillance
. American Journal of Roentgenology 
2007 ; 188 : 940 –4
. doi: 10.2214/AJR.06.0764 17377027 
10. Whitlow CB , Beck DE , Gathright JB  
Surgical excision of large rectal villous adenomas
. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 
1996 ; ; 5 : 723 –34
1996 . doi: 10.1016/S1055-3207(18)30374-0 8829329 
11. Teoh SK , Whitman GJ , Chew FS  
Villous adenoma of the colon
. American Journal of Roentgenology 
1996 ; 167 : 1146 . doi: 10.2214/ajr.167.5.8911168 8911168 
12. Won HC , Jongpil R , Hye K , et al 
A case of giant rectal villous tumour with severe fluid-electrolyte imbalance treated by laparoscopic low anterior resection
. J Korean Surg Soc 
2012 ; ; 82 : 325 –9
2012 .22563542 
13. Drazan KE , McKittrick LS  
Carcinoma of the colon 1954
. Dis Colon Rectum 
1997 ; ; 40 : 1494 –6
1997 .9407991 
14. Barekman WH  
Villous adenoma of the rectosigmoid and sigmoid colon: report of two cases
. Radiology 
1962 ; 1962 : 217 –21
.
15. Coscina WF , Arger PH , Herlinger H , Levine MS , Coleman BG , Mintz MC  
Ct diagnosis of villous adenoma
. J Comput Assist Tomogr 
1986 ; ; 10 : 764 –6
1986 . doi: 10.1097/00004728-198609000-00010 3745546 
16. Riba PO , Lunderquist A  
Angiographic findings in villous tumors of the colon
. American Journal of Roentgenology 
1973 ; ; 117 : 287 –91
1973 Feb . doi: 10.2214/ajr.117.2.287 
17. Iida M , Iwashita A , Yao T , Kitagawa S , Sakamoto K , Tanaka K , et al 
Villous tumor of the colon: correlation of histologic, macroscopic, and radiographic features
. Radiology 
1988 ; 167 : 673 –7
. doi: 10.1148/radiology.167.3.3363124 3363124


{'source': 'PubMedDataset'}