Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +111 -45
README.md CHANGED
@@ -1,25 +1,23 @@
1
  ---
2
- license: apache-2.0
3
  tags:
4
  - computer_vision
5
  - pose_estimation
 
 
6
  ---
7
 
8
- Copyright 2021-2023 by Mackenzie Mathis, Alexander Mathis, Shaokai Ye and contributors. All rights reserved.
9
 
 
10
 
11
- - Please cite **Ye et al 2023** if you use this model in your work https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.07436v1
12
- - If this license is not suitable for your business or project
13
- please contact EPFL-TTO (https://tto.epfl.ch/) for a full commercial license.
14
 
15
- This software may not be used to harm any animal deliberately!
16
 
17
-
18
- **MODEL CARD:**
19
-
20
- This model was trained a dataset called "Quadrupred-40K." It was trained in Tensorflow 2 within the [DeepLabCut framework](www.deeplabcut.org).
21
- Full training details can be found in Ye et al. 2023, but in brief, this was trained with **DLCRNet** as introduced in [Lauer et al 2022 Nature Methods](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-022-01443-0).
22
- You can use this model simply with our light-weight loading package called [DLCLibrary](https://github.com/DeepLabCut/DLClibrary). Here is an example useage:
23
 
24
  ```python
25
  from pathlib import Path
@@ -31,60 +29,128 @@ model_dir.mkdir()
31
  download_huggingface_model("superanimal_quadruped", model_dir)
32
  ```
33
 
34
- **Training Data:**
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
35
 
36
  It consists of being trained together on the following datasets:
37
 
38
- - **AwA-Pose** Quadruped dataset, see full details at (9).
39
- - **AnimalPose** See full details at (10).
40
- - **AcinoSet** See full details at (11).
41
- - **Horse-30** Horse-30 dataset, benchmark task is called Horse-10; See full details at (12).
42
- - **StanfordDogs** See full details at (13, 14).
43
- - **AP-10K** See full details at (15).
44
  - **iRodent** We utilized the iNaturalist API functions for scraping observations
45
- with the taxon ID of Suborder Myomorpha (16). The functions allowed us to filter the large amount of observations down to the
46
  ones with photos under the CC BY-NC creative license. The most common types of rodents from the collected observations are
47
  Muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus), Brown Rat (Rattus norvegicus), House Mouse (Mus musculus), Black Rat (Rattus rattus), Hispid
48
  Cotton Rat (Sigmodon hispidus), Meadow Vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus), Bank Vole (Clethrionomys glareolus), Deer Mouse
49
  (Peromyscus maniculatus), White-footed Mouse (Peromyscus leucopus), Striped Field Mouse (Apodemus agrarius). We then
50
  generated segmentation masks over target animals in the data by processing the media through an algorithm we designed that
51
- uses a Mask Region Based Convolutional Neural Networks(Mask R-CNN) (17) model with a ResNet-50-FPN backbone (18),
52
- pretrained on the COCO datasets (19). The processed 443 images were then manually labeled with both pose annotations and
53
- segmentation masks.
54
-
55
- Here is an image with the keypoint guide, the distribution of images per dataset, and examples from the datasets inferenced with a model trained with less data for benchmarking as in Ye et al 2023.
56
- Thereby note that performance of this model we are releasing has comporable or higher performance.
57
-
58
- Please note that each dataest was labeled by separate labs & seperate individuals, therefore while we map names
59
- to a unified pose vocabulary, there will be annotator bias in keypoint placement (See Ye et al. 2023 for our Supplementary Note on annotator bias).
60
- You will also note the dataset is highly diverse across species, but collectively has more representation of domesticated animals like dogs, cats, horses, and cattle.
61
- We recommend if performance is not as good as you need it to be, first try video adaptation (see Ye et al. 2023),
62
- or fine-tune these weights with your own labeling.
63
 
 
64
  <p align="center">
65
  <img src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/57f6d51c9f74566f55ecf271/1690988780004-AG00N6OU1R21MZ0AU9RE/modelcard-SAQ.png?format=1500w" width="95%">
66
  </p>
67
 
68
 
69
- 9. Prianka Banik, Lin Li, and Xishuang Dong. A novel dataset for keypoint detection of quadruped animals from images. ArXiv, abs/2108.13958, 2021
70
- 10. Jinkun Cao, Hongyang Tang, Haoshu Fang, Xiaoyong Shen, Cewu Lu, and Yu-Wing Tai. Cross-domain adaptation for animal pose estimation.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
71
  2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 9497–9506, 2019.
72
- 11. Daniel Joska, Liam Clark, Naoya Muramatsu, Ricardo Jericevich, Fred Nicolls, Alexander Mathis, Mackenzie W. Mathis, and Amir Patel. Acinoset:
73
  A 3d pose estimation dataset and baseline models for cheetahs in the wild. 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
74
  (ICRA), pages 13901–13908, 2021.
75
- 12. Alexander Mathis, Thomas Biasi, Steffen Schneider, Mert Yuksekgonul, Byron Rogers, Matthias Bethge, and Mackenzie W Mathis. Pretraining
76
  boosts out-of-domain robustness for pose estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision,
77
  pages 1859–1868, 2021.
78
- 13. Aditya Khosla, Nityananda Jayadevaprakash, Bangpeng Yao, and Li Fei-Fei. Novel dataset for fine-grained image categorization. In First Workshop
79
  on Fine-Grained Visual Categorization, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Colorado Springs, CO, June 2011.
80
- 14. Benjamin Biggs, Thomas Roddick, Andrew Fitzgibbon, and Roberto Cipolla. Creatures great and smal: Recovering the shape and motion of
81
  animals from video. In Asian Conference on Computer Vision, pages 3–19. Springer, 2018.
82
- 15. Hang Yu, Yufei Xu, Jing Zhang, Wei Zhao, Ziyu Guan, and Dacheng Tao. Ap-10k: A benchmark for animal pose estimation in the wild. In Thirty-fifth
83
  Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track (Round 2), 2021.
84
- 16. iNaturalist. OGBIF Occurrence Download. https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.p7nbxt. iNaturalist, July 2020
85
- 17. Kaiming He, Georgia Gkioxari, Piotr Dollár, and Ross Girshick. Mask r-cnn. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer
86
  vision, pages 2961–2969, 2017.
87
- 18. Tsung-Yi Lin, Piotr Dollár, Ross Girshick, Kaiming He, Bharath Hariharan, and Serge Belongie. Feature pyramid networks for object detection, 2016.
88
- 19. Tsung-Yi Lin, Michael Maire, Serge J. Belongie, Lubomir D. Bourdev, Ross B. Girshick, James Hays, Pietro Perona, Deva Ramanan, Piotr Doll’ar,
89
- and C. Lawrence Zitnick. Microsoft COCO: common objects in context. CoRR, abs/1405.0312, 2014
90
-
 
1
  ---
 
2
  tags:
3
  - computer_vision
4
  - pose_estimation
5
+ - animal_pose_estimation
6
+ - deeplabcut
7
  ---
8
 
9
+ # MODEL CARD:
10
 
11
+ ## Model Details
12
 
13
+ • SuperAnimal-Quadruped model developed by the [M.W.Mathis Lab](http://www.mackenziemathislab.org/) in 2023, trained to predict quadruped pose from images.
14
+ Please see [Shaokai Ye et al. 2023](https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.07436) for details.
 
15
 
16
+ The model is an HRNet-w32 trained on our Quadruped-80K dataset.
17
 
18
+ • It was trained within the DeepLabCut framework. Full training details can be found in Ye et al. 2023.
19
+ You can use this model simply with our light-weight loading package called [DLCLibrary](https://github.com/DeepLabCut/DLClibrary).
20
+ Here is an example useage:
 
 
 
21
 
22
  ```python
23
  from pathlib import Path
 
29
  download_huggingface_model("superanimal_quadruped", model_dir)
30
  ```
31
 
32
+ ## Intended Use
33
+ • Intended to be used for pose estimation of quadruped images taken from side-view. The model serves a better starting
34
+ point than ImageNet weights in downstream datasets such as AP-10K.
35
+
36
+ • Intended for academic and research professionals working in fields related to animal behavior, such as neuroscience
37
+ and ecology.
38
+
39
+ • Not suitable as a zeros-shot model for applications that require high keypiont precision, but can be fine-tuned with
40
+ minimal data to reach human-level accuracy. Also not suitable for videos that look dramatically different from those
41
+ we show in the paper.
42
+
43
+ ## Factors
44
+
45
+ • Based on the known robustness issues of neural networks, the relevant factors include the lighting, contrast and
46
+ resolution of the video frames. The present of objects might also cause false detections and erroneous keypoints.
47
+ When two or more animals are extremely close, it could cause the top-down detectors to only detect only one animal,
48
+ if used without further fine-tuning or with a method such as BUCTD (Zhou et al. 2023 ICCV).
49
+
50
+ ## Metrics
51
+ • Mean Average Precision (mAP)
52
+
53
+ ## Evaluation Data
54
+ • In the paper we benchmark on AP-10K, AnimalPose, Horse-10, and iRodent using a leave-one-out strategy. Here,
55
+ we provide the model that has been trained on all datasets (see below), therefore it should be considered “fine-tuned"
56
+ on all animal training data listed below. This model is meant for production and evaluation in downstream scientific
57
+ applications.
58
+
59
+ ## Training Data:
60
 
61
  It consists of being trained together on the following datasets:
62
 
63
+ - **AwA-Pose** Quadruped dataset, see full details at (1).
64
+ - **AnimalPose** See full details at (2).
65
+ - **AcinoSet** See full details at (3).
66
+ - **Horse-30** Horse-30 dataset, benchmark task is called Horse-10; See full details at (4).
67
+ - **StanfordDogs** See full details at (5, 6).
68
+ - **AP-10K** See full details at (7).
69
  - **iRodent** We utilized the iNaturalist API functions for scraping observations
70
+ with the taxon ID of Suborder Myomorpha (8). The functions allowed us to filter the large amount of observations down to the
71
  ones with photos under the CC BY-NC creative license. The most common types of rodents from the collected observations are
72
  Muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus), Brown Rat (Rattus norvegicus), House Mouse (Mus musculus), Black Rat (Rattus rattus), Hispid
73
  Cotton Rat (Sigmodon hispidus), Meadow Vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus), Bank Vole (Clethrionomys glareolus), Deer Mouse
74
  (Peromyscus maniculatus), White-footed Mouse (Peromyscus leucopus), Striped Field Mouse (Apodemus agrarius). We then
75
  generated segmentation masks over target animals in the data by processing the media through an algorithm we designed that
76
+ uses a Mask Region Based Convolutional Neural Networks(Mask R-CNN) (8) model with a ResNet-50-FPN backbone (9),
77
+ pretrained on the COCO datasets (10). The processed 443 images were then manually labeled with both pose annotations and
78
+ segmentation masks. iRodent data is banked at https://zenodo.org/record/8250392.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
79
 
80
+ Here is an image with the keypoint guide:
81
  <p align="center">
82
  <img src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/57f6d51c9f74566f55ecf271/1690988780004-AG00N6OU1R21MZ0AU9RE/modelcard-SAQ.png?format=1500w" width="95%">
83
  </p>
84
 
85
 
86
+ ## Ethical Considerations
87
+
88
+ • No experimental data was collected for this model; all datasets used are cited.
89
+
90
+ ## Caveats and Recommendations
91
+
92
+ • The model may have reduced accuracy in scenarios with extremely varied lighting conditions or atypical animal
93
+ characteristics not well-represented in the training data.
94
+
95
+ • Please note that each dataest was labeled by separate labs & separate individuals, therefore while we map names to a
96
+ unified pose vocabulary, there will be annotator bias in keypoint placement (See Ye et al. 2023 for our Supplementary
97
+ Note on annotator bias).
98
+
99
+ • Note the dataset is highly diverse across species, but collectively has more
100
+ representation of domesticated animals like dogs, cats, horses, and cattle.
101
+
102
+ • We recommend if performance is not as
103
+ good as you need it to be, first try video adaptation (see Ye et al. 2023), or fine-tune these weights with your own
104
+ labeling.
105
+
106
+ ## License
107
+
108
+ Modified MIT.
109
+
110
+ Copyright 2023 by Mackenzie Mathis, Shaokai Ye, and contributors.
111
+
112
+ Permission is hereby granted to you (hereafter "LICENSEE") a fully-paid, non-exclusive,
113
+ and non-transferable license for academic, non-commercial purposes only (hereafter “LICENSE”)
114
+ to use the "MODEL" weights (hereafter "MODEL"), subject to the following conditions:
115
+
116
+ The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial
117
+ portions of the Software:
118
+
119
+ This software may not be used to harm any animal deliberately.
120
+
121
+ LICENSEE acknowledges that the MODEL is a research tool.
122
+ THE MODEL IS PROVIDED “AS IS”, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
123
+ BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.
124
+ IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY,
125
+ WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE MODEL
126
+ OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE MODEL.
127
+
128
+ If this license is not appropriate for your application, please contact Prof. Mackenzie W. Mathis
129
+ (mackenzie@post.harvard.edu) and/or the TTO office at EPFL (tto@epfl.ch) for a commercial use license.
130
+
131
+ Please cite **Ye et al** if you use this model in your work https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.07436v2.
132
+
133
+
134
+ ## References
135
+
136
+ 1. Prianka Banik, Lin Li, and Xishuang Dong. A novel dataset for keypoint detection of quadruped animals from images. ArXiv, abs/2108.13958, 2021
137
+ 2. Jinkun Cao, Hongyang Tang, Haoshu Fang, Xiaoyong Shen, Cewu Lu, and Yu-Wing Tai. Cross-domain adaptation for animal pose estimation.
138
  2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 9497–9506, 2019.
139
+ 3. Daniel Joska, Liam Clark, Naoya Muramatsu, Ricardo Jericevich, Fred Nicolls, Alexander Mathis, Mackenzie W. Mathis, and Amir Patel. Acinoset:
140
  A 3d pose estimation dataset and baseline models for cheetahs in the wild. 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
141
  (ICRA), pages 13901–13908, 2021.
142
+ 4. Alexander Mathis, Thomas Biasi, Steffen Schneider, Mert Yuksekgonul, Byron Rogers, Matthias Bethge, and Mackenzie W Mathis. Pretraining
143
  boosts out-of-domain robustness for pose estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision,
144
  pages 1859–1868, 2021.
145
+ 5. Aditya Khosla, Nityananda Jayadevaprakash, Bangpeng Yao, and Li Fei-Fei. Novel dataset for fine-grained image categorization. In First Workshop
146
  on Fine-Grained Visual Categorization, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Colorado Springs, CO, June 2011.
147
+ 6. Benjamin Biggs, Thomas Roddick, Andrew Fitzgibbon, and Roberto Cipolla. Creatures great and smal: Recovering the shape and motion of
148
  animals from video. In Asian Conference on Computer Vision, pages 3–19. Springer, 2018.
149
+ 7. Hang Yu, Yufei Xu, Jing Zhang, Wei Zhao, Ziyu Guan, and Dacheng Tao. Ap-10k: A benchmark for animal pose estimation in the wild. In Thirty-fifth
150
  Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track (Round 2), 2021.
151
+ 8. iNaturalist. OGBIF Occurrence Download. https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.p7nbxt. iNaturalist, July 2020
152
+ 9. Kaiming He, Georgia Gkioxari, Piotr Dollár, and Ross Girshick. Mask r-cnn. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer
153
  vision, pages 2961–2969, 2017.
154
+ 10. Tsung-Yi Lin, Piotr Dollár, Ross Girshick, Kaiming He, Bharath Hariharan, and Serge Belongie. Feature pyramid networks for object detection, 2016.
155
+ 11. Tsung-Yi Lin, Michael Maire, Serge J. Belongie, Lubomir D. Bourdev, Ross B. Girshick, James Hays, Pietro Perona, Deva Ramanan, Piotr Doll’ar,
156
+ and C. Lawrence Zitnick. Microsoft COCO: common objects in context. CoRR, abs/1405.0312, 2014