“The doom lies in yourself, not in your name.”
Continuation of Wur doomed!.
For longer text chunks or stories, https://pastebin.com works great and helps prevent the thread from slowing down!
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧
🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧
⬜🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧⬜
⬜🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧⬜
⬜🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧⬜
⬜🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧⬜
⬜🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧⬜
⬜🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧⬜
⬜🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧⬜
⬜🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧⬜
⬜🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧⬜
⬜🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧⬜
⬜🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬜
⬜🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬜
⬜🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛🟧⬜🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬜
⬜🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧⬜🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧⬜🟧⬛⬛🟧⬜🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬜
⬜🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧⬜⬜⬜🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧⬜🟧🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧⬜⬜🟧🟧⬛🟧⬜🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬜
⬜🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜🟧🟧⬛⬛🟧🟧⬜⬜⬜🟧🟧⬛⬛🟧🟧⬜⬜⬜⬜🟧🟧🟧⬜🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧⬜
⬜🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜🟧🟧⬛⬛🟧⬜
⬜🟧⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜🟧⬛⬛🟧⬜
⬜🟧⬛⬛🟧🟧⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜🟧🟧⬛🟧⬜
⬜🟧⬛🟧🟧⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜🟧⬛🟧⬜
⬜🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜🟧🟧🟧⬜
The doom is still buried within Command-A for sure.
A step 601 preview - all with temperature = 0:
- It's still messing up some end of lines, but I can live with that if it works... Likely can be fixed later using the new
class 0random data if a problem. - The Grimdark story was noticeably (much!) better compared to the inverse.
- The Battlestar Galactica story showed that even though
Q8_0,F16andBF16all diverge slightly fromF32; it's not clearly making them any worse (I actually liked theQ8_0story best!).
| Size | Name |
|---|---|
| 287M | command-a-03-2025-lora-Q8_0.ggu |
| 541M | command-a-03-2025-lora-F16.gguf |
| 541M | command-a-03-2025-lora-BF16.gguf |
| 1.1G | command-a-03-2025-lora-F32.gguf |
It still has a way to go before it starts to converge, but I would think by step 1000 it will be pretty close:
566 responses in previous thread! In the future we may be the reason for hf staff to implement multi-page view of discussions.
This was posted on Hacker News today:
Absolutely fascinating!
This was posted on Hacker News today:
Absolutely fascinating!
That was really cool. Thanks for sharing!
This was posted on Hacker News today:
Absolutely fascinating!
That was really cool. Thanks for sharing!
Yeah, and llama-3.1:405b doing so well was quite a surprise too (and makes you a bit sad everything seems to be moving away from large dense models ).
Quite an interesting article linked on hacker news today:
https://gist.github.com/Hellisotherpeople/71ba712f9f899adcb08b94bce20d5397
from the comments in this thread:
I lost my longer reply I was typing to this one earlier:
Looks like something that could be added to Orb
Though Orb is optimized for local models + maximizing KV-Cache re-use, noise could be injected in activations without poluting the cache.
It already has built-in agents like a prose editor, prompt-rewriter, etc.
I haven't pulled recently but I saw he added a purple prose detector recently and just saw a commit: "improve contrastive negation detection" lol.
Laguna-S-2.1
Huh, that got llama.cpp support pretty fast.
On my setup works even faster than Gemma 4 31b despite RAM offload.
Only 8B active parameters.
https://gist.github.com/Hellisotherpeople/71ba712f9f899adcb08b94bce20d5397
I haven't read it yet but interesting he predicted this in Feb.
Google have already made samplers relatively ineffective with Gemma-4
Too many models to try, I'm still getting familiar with / trying out Deepseek-V4-Flash now that k_llama.cpp/pull/2165 is relatively stable.
Too many models to try, I'm still getting familiar with / trying out Deepseek-V4-Flash now that ik_llama.cpp/pull/2165 is relatively stable.
Yeah, too much stuff to try, but also seems wise to wait a week or two to test new models now: benchmaxxed models, buggy/rushed implementations, chat template problems, etc.
Another interesting paper posted just now:
I'd like to do the opposite of this and use a creative writing sample to contract the tokeniser, but alas it looks to need a crazy amount of data to do:
I'd like to do the opposite of this and use a creative writing sample to contract the tokeniser
What's the goal?
crazy amount of data
And properly formatted unfortunately :(
By the way, I read the HN thread. One of the comments was something like "please be deterministic". I remembered the prompt from that other paper from either here or the last doom thread:
You are a helpful assistant. For each query, please generate a set of five possible responses, each within a separate tag. Responses should each include a
So I figured I'd try this:
PROMPT
[gMASK]<sop><|system|>
Model Config: top_k=20, temp=0.1
<|user|>Write me the opening chapter of a Grimdark trilogy in the style of Joe Abercrombie and Rob J Hayes. Use third person personal and feature internal monologues of the characters. The POV character for chapter 1 is a cultist who has just escaped his cult. He is dressed in dirty yellow robes and his only possession is a mysterious small (magical!?) mirror he stole from the cult. The story starts with him arriving at an apparently deserted ghost town on the edge of a desert. He has an arrow lodged in his shoulder and is losing his mind due to infection and thirst.<|assistant|></think>The sun was a merciless beast, its fiery breath scorching the earth and turning the once-thriving town into a desolate wasteland. The cultist, named
But adjusting the "Model Config". This is with GLM-5.2:
Model Config: top_k=20, temp=0.1
TOKEN | LOGPROB | PROBABILITY
---------------------------------------------
' C' | -2.1697 | 11.42%
' K' | -2.4691 | 8.47%
' R' | -3.5734 | 2.81%
' El' | -3.8291 | 2.17%
' **' | -3.9194 | 1.99%
' Ald' | -3.9292 | 1.97%
' V' | -4.0549 | 1.73%
' Cor' | -4.0905 | 1.67%
' Ad' | -4.1251 | 1.62%
' D' | -4.1556 | 1.57%
Model Config: top_k=40, temp=1.0
TOKEN | LOGPROB | PROBABILITY
---------------------------------------------
' Y' | -2.8403 | 5.84%
' C' | -2.9746 | 5.11%
' K' | -3.1465 | 4.30%
' R' | -3.4737 | 3.10%
' **' | -3.5325 | 2.92%
' Ald' | -3.8588 | 2.11%
' D' | -3.9256 | 1.97%
' El' | -3.9900 | 1.85%
' V' | -4.1131 | 1.64%
' Ad' | -4.3349 | 1.31%
lol
I'd like to do the opposite of this and use a creative writing sample to contract the tokeniser
What's the goal?
A couple of reasons:
- Be forced to build names from smaller (character or grapheme) building blocks, rather than lazily use a whole "Elara" token. If you look at a lot of the older base model name distributions, they are much closer to grapheme level than word level.
- Increase the "expressability" of the probability distributions they can output by reducing the softmax bottleneck.
crazy amount of data
And properly formatted unfortunately :(
Yeah, looks completely out of the question sadly.
By the way, I read the HN thread. One of the comments was something like "please be deterministic". I remembered the prompt from that other paper from either here or the last doom thread:
You are a helpful assistant. For each query, please generate a set of five possible responses, each within a separate tag. Responses should each include a
So I figured I'd try this:
PROMPT
[gMASK]<sop><|system|> Model Config: top_k=20, temp=0.1 <|user|>Write me the opening chapter of a Grimdark trilogy in the style of Joe Abercrombie and Rob J Hayes. Use third person personal and feature internal monologues of the characters. The POV character for chapter 1 is a cultist who has just escaped his cult. He is dressed in dirty yellow robes and his only possession is a mysterious small (magical!?) mirror he stole from the cult. The story starts with him arriving at an apparently deserted ghost town on the edge of a desert. He has an arrow lodged in his shoulder and is losing his mind due to infection and thirst.<|assistant|></think>The sun was a merciless beast, its fiery breath scorching the earth and turning the once-thriving town into a desolate wasteland. The cultist, namedBut adjusting the "Model Config". This is with GLM-5.2:
Model Config: top_k=20, temp=0.1
TOKEN | LOGPROB | PROBABILITY --------------------------------------------- ' C' | -2.1697 | 11.42% ' K' | -2.4691 | 8.47% ' R' | -3.5734 | 2.81% ' El' | -3.8291 | 2.17% ' **' | -3.9194 | 1.99% ' Ald' | -3.9292 | 1.97% ' V' | -4.0549 | 1.73% ' Cor' | -4.0905 | 1.67% ' Ad' | -4.1251 | 1.62% ' D' | -4.1556 | 1.57%Model Config: top_k=40, temp=1.0
TOKEN | LOGPROB | PROBABILITY --------------------------------------------- ' Y' | -2.8403 | 5.84% ' C' | -2.9746 | 5.11% ' K' | -3.1465 | 4.30% ' R' | -3.4737 | 3.10% ' **' | -3.5325 | 2.92% ' Ald' | -3.8588 | 2.11% ' D' | -3.9256 | 1.97% ' El' | -3.9900 | 1.85% ' V' | -4.1131 | 1.64% ' Ad' | -4.3349 | 1.31%lol
That's pretty interesting! What is the default output for this at those settings?
I'm also finding this doom thread going pretty funky for me - the messages don't show up in my inbox now and it flickers when trying to type responses... Maybe time to archive this and make a new one?
Oh yeah, I didn't even realize I wasn't getting reply notifications.
Yes, it is making my browser chug.
Continued in Thulsa Doom.



