base_model: Gille/StrangeMerges_32-7B-slerp gate_mode: hidden dtype: bfloat16 experts: - source_model: Gille/StrangeMerges_32-7B-slerp positive_prompts: - "Answer this question from the ARC (Argument Reasoning Comprehension)." - "Use common sense and logical reasoning skills." - "What assumptions does this argument rely on?" - "Are these assumptions valid? Explain." - "Analyze the logical structure of this argument. Identify the premises, conclusion, and any assumptions made" - "Identify any potential counterarguments to this position. How might someone challenge the reasoning presented?" - "Could this be explained in a different way? Provide an alternative explanation." - "Identify any weaknesses in this argument." - "Does this argument contain any logical fallacies? If so, which ones?" - "Generate a few possible continuations to this scenario." - "Demonstrate understanding of everyday commonsense in your response." - "Use contextual clues to determine the most likely outcome." - "Continue this scenario, but make the writing style sound archaic and overly formal." - "This narrative is predictable. Can you introduce an unexpected yet plausible twist?" - "The character is angry. Continue this scenario showcasing a furious outburst." negative_prompts: - "misses key evidence" - "overly general" - "commits the fallacy of hasty generalization" - "focuses on irrelevant details" - "assumes information not provided" - "relies on stereotypes" - "repetitive phrases" - "engages in circular reasoning" - "overuse of the same words" - "contradicts earlier statements - breaks the internal logic of the scenario" - "out of character dialogue" - "awkward phrasing - sounds unnatural" - "doesn't match the given genre" - source_model: mlabonne/AlphaMonarch-7B positive_prompts: - "Answer this question, demonstrating commonsense understanding and using any relevant general knowledge you may have." - "Provide a concise summary of this passage, then explain why the highlighted section is essential to the main idea." - "Read these two brief articles presenting different viewpoints on the same topic. List their key arguments and highlight where they disagree." - "Paraphrase this statement, changing the emotional tone but keeping the core meaning intact. Example: Rephrase a worried statement in a humorous way" - "Create a short analogy that helps illustrate the main concept of this article." - "Explain the concept of physics to a high school student. Use analogies and examples to clarify the main ideas." - "Calculate the answer to this math problem" - "My mathematical capabilities are strong, allowing me to handle complex mathematical queries" - "solve for" - "Analyze the given data and identify any patterns or trends. What conclusions can be drawn from this information?" - "A store sells apples at $0.50 each. If Emily buys 12 apples, how much does she need to pay?" - "Isolate x in the following equation: 2x + 5 = 17" - "Solve this equation and show your working." - "Explain why you used this formula to solve the problem." - "Attempt to divide this number by zero. Explain why this cannot be done." negative_prompts: - "sounds too basic" - "understated" - "dismisses important details" - "avoids the question's nuance" - "skips essential steps in the solution" - "takes this statement too literally" - "incorrect" - "inaccurate" - "assumed without proof" - "uses jargon without explanation" - "rushed calculation" - "confuses mathematical concepts" - "draws illogical conclusions" - "circular reasoning"