Upload folder using huggingface_hub
Browse files- .gitattributes +1 -0
- README.md +9 -0
- figures/VV-3dB-25.png +3 -0
- figures/swinv2cnn.png +0 -0
.gitattributes
CHANGED
|
@@ -619,3 +619,4 @@ dataset/Zmutt/20231028_Zmutt_hillshade.tif filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
|
| 619 |
dataset/Zmutt/20231028_Zmutt_s1.tif filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
| 620 |
dataset/Zmutt/20231028_Zmutt_s2.tif filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
| 621 |
dataset/Zmutt/Zmutt_dem.tif filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 619 |
dataset/Zmutt/20231028_Zmutt_s1.tif filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
| 620 |
dataset/Zmutt/20231028_Zmutt_s2.tif filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
| 621 |
dataset/Zmutt/Zmutt_dem.tif filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
| 622 |
+
figures/VV-3dB-25.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -21,6 +21,11 @@ backscatter with a 3 dB threshold and a 25\% wet snow percentage threshold.
|
|
| 21 |
This method achieved high accuracy, identifying the start of snowmelt within an average
|
| 22 |
of 6.5 days compared to in-situ physical simulations.
|
| 23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 24 |
Second, Glacial Lake Segmentation was performed using deep
|
| 25 |
learning-based semantic segmentation models. These models integrated multi-source data,
|
| 26 |
including Sentinel-1 (radar), Sentinel-2 (optical), and Digital Elevation Models
|
|
@@ -33,6 +38,10 @@ accurate segmentation of early-stage lakes.
|
|
| 33 |
Overall, the work demonstrates that advanced deep learning models
|
| 34 |
outperform traditional machine learning methods for glacial lake mapping.
|
| 35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
## Repository Structure
|
| 38 |
- `dataset/`: Contains the data for the Deep Learning models, including satellite images and corresponding labels.
|
|
|
|
| 21 |
This method achieved high accuracy, identifying the start of snowmelt within an average
|
| 22 |
of 6.5 days compared to in-situ physical simulations.
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
+
Results Example:
|
| 25 |
+
|
| 26 |
+

|
| 27 |
+
|
| 28 |
+
|
| 29 |
Second, Glacial Lake Segmentation was performed using deep
|
| 30 |
learning-based semantic segmentation models. These models integrated multi-source data,
|
| 31 |
including Sentinel-1 (radar), Sentinel-2 (optical), and Digital Elevation Models
|
|
|
|
| 38 |
Overall, the work demonstrates that advanced deep learning models
|
| 39 |
outperform traditional machine learning methods for glacial lake mapping.
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
+
The best performing model (SwinV2-CNN U-Net) architecture:
|
| 42 |
+
|
| 43 |
+

|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
## Repository Structure
|
| 47 |
- `dataset/`: Contains the data for the Deep Learning models, including satellite images and corresponding labels.
|
figures/VV-3dB-25.png
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
figures/swinv2cnn.png
ADDED
|