Timerns commited on
Commit
256abfc
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): d3b150f

Upload folder using huggingface_hub

Browse files
Files changed (4) hide show
  1. .gitattributes +1 -0
  2. README.md +9 -0
  3. figures/VV-3dB-25.png +3 -0
  4. figures/swinv2cnn.png +0 -0
.gitattributes CHANGED
@@ -619,3 +619,4 @@ dataset/Zmutt/20231028_Zmutt_hillshade.tif filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
619
  dataset/Zmutt/20231028_Zmutt_s1.tif filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
620
  dataset/Zmutt/20231028_Zmutt_s2.tif filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
621
  dataset/Zmutt/Zmutt_dem.tif filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 
 
619
  dataset/Zmutt/20231028_Zmutt_s1.tif filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
620
  dataset/Zmutt/20231028_Zmutt_s2.tif filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
621
  dataset/Zmutt/Zmutt_dem.tif filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
622
+ figures/VV-3dB-25.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
README.md CHANGED
@@ -21,6 +21,11 @@ backscatter with a 3 dB threshold and a 25\% wet snow percentage threshold.
21
  This method achieved high accuracy, identifying the start of snowmelt within an average
22
  of 6.5 days compared to in-situ physical simulations.
23
 
 
 
 
 
 
24
  Second, Glacial Lake Segmentation was performed using deep
25
  learning-based semantic segmentation models. These models integrated multi-source data,
26
  including Sentinel-1 (radar), Sentinel-2 (optical), and Digital Elevation Models
@@ -33,6 +38,10 @@ accurate segmentation of early-stage lakes.
33
  Overall, the work demonstrates that advanced deep learning models
34
  outperform traditional machine learning methods for glacial lake mapping.
35
 
 
 
 
 
36
 
37
  ## Repository Structure
38
  - `dataset/`: Contains the data for the Deep Learning models, including satellite images and corresponding labels.
 
21
  This method achieved high accuracy, identifying the start of snowmelt within an average
22
  of 6.5 days compared to in-situ physical simulations.
23
 
24
+ Results Example:
25
+
26
+ ![Melting Season Assessment](./figures/VV-3dB-25.png)
27
+
28
+
29
  Second, Glacial Lake Segmentation was performed using deep
30
  learning-based semantic segmentation models. These models integrated multi-source data,
31
  including Sentinel-1 (radar), Sentinel-2 (optical), and Digital Elevation Models
 
38
  Overall, the work demonstrates that advanced deep learning models
39
  outperform traditional machine learning methods for glacial lake mapping.
40
 
41
+ The best performing model (SwinV2-CNN U-Net) architecture:
42
+
43
+ ![Lake Segmentation Example](./figures/swinv2cnn.png)
44
+
45
 
46
  ## Repository Structure
47
  - `dataset/`: Contains the data for the Deep Learning models, including satellite images and corresponding labels.
figures/VV-3dB-25.png ADDED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: 1143ec5fbea258cf022f2a634b93fc85c950ede066fc8c81e19c2e373b549203
  • Pointer size: 131 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 769 kB
figures/swinv2cnn.png ADDED