Excessive Bail Schwartz & Pratt – 9.04 Failure to Produce Exculpatory Evidence Avery et al. – 12.29 - 12.30 Schwartz & – 9.01 Manufactured, Coerced, or False Evidence Avery et al. – 12.25 - 12.28 Schwartz & Pratt – 9.02 Plaintiff’s Status Schwartz & Pratt – 3.04 Prisoner – Disciplinary Sanctions Schwartz & – 11.04 Prisoner – Retaliation 7th Cir. – (Civil) 6.03 11th Cir. – (Civil) 5.1 Procedural Due Process O’Malley et al. – 168.80 - 168.151 Schwartz & Pratt – 6.01 Regulatory Takings Schwartz & Pratt – 6.03 Substantive Due Process Schwartz & Pratt – 6.02 Trial Trial
Unreasonable Search 9th Cir. – (Civil) 9.12 - 9.17, 9.22 Avery et al. – 12.15 - 12.19 O’Malley et al. – 165.22 Sand et al. – 87.03 (87-74B) Rights – Section 1985 Conspiracy Claims O’Malley et al. – Chapter 167 Sand et al. – 87.04 Damages 5th Cir. – (Civil) 10.12, 15.1 - 15.7 9th Cir. – 5.1 - 5.6 Sand et al. – Chapter 77 Schwartz & Pratt – Chapter 18 Defenses Miscellaneous O’Malley et al. – 107.01 - 107.04 Eminent Domain 5th Cir. – (Civil) 13.3 O’Malley et al. – Chapter 154 Evidence Admissions in Pleadings O’Malley et al. – 101.46 Credibility of Witnesses 1st Cir. (Criminal) – 1.06, 3.06 5th Cir. (Criminal) – 1.08 6th Cir. (Criminal) – 1.07
7th Cir. (Criminal) – 3.01 8th Cir. – (Civil) 3.4; (Criminal) 1.05 9th Cir. – 1.14; (Criminal) 1.7 & 3.9 10th Cir. (Criminal) – 1.08 O’Malley et al. – 15:01 - 15:15 (criminal 105:01 - 105:12 (civil cases) Cross-Examination of Character Witness 7th Cir. – (Civil) 2.10 8th Cir. – (Civil) 2.07 O’Malley et al. – 11:15 (criminal cases) Sand et al. – 5.06 (5-16) Demonstrative Evidence 5th Cir. – 2.8 7th Cir. – (Civil) 1.24; (Criminal) 3.17 8th Cir. – (Civil) 2.11; (Criminal) 4.11 9th Cir. – (Civil) 2.14; (Criminal) 4.16 Fingerprints O’Malley et al. – 14.12 & 104.51 or Routine Practice Evidence Sand et al. – 74.03 Handwriting O’Malley et al. – 104.52 Impeachment by Inconsistent Statements 1st Cir. (Criminal) – 2.03 5th Cir. – (Civil) 2.11 6th Cir. (Criminal) – 7.04 7th Cir. – (Civil) 1.14; (Criminal) 3.03 & 3.04 10th Cir. (Criminal) – 1.10 11th Cir. – (Civil) 3.5.1; (Criminal) 6.1 - 6.6
8th Cir. – (Civil) 2.02 & 2.03; (Criminal) 2.02 & 2.03 9th Cir. – (Civil) 2.1 & 2.2; (Criminal) 2.3 & 2.4 11th Cir. – (Civil) 2.1 O’Malley et al. – Chapter 102 O’Malley et al. – 101.47 Sand et al. – 74.02 (74-4) Stipulations at pretrial conference O’Malley et al. – 101.47 View of Location Permitted O’Malley et al. – 11.07; 102.26 General Instructions Common Counsel Sand et al. – 71-8 Judge’s Comments on Evidence O’Malley et al. – 102.73 Questions to Witnesses O’Malley et al. – 11.05, 101.30, 102.72 Missing Witness 1st Cir. (Criminal) – 2.12 5th Cir. – (Civil) 2.9 7th Cir. – 1.19 8th Cir. – (Criminal) 4.16 9th Cir. – (Criminal) 4.13 O’Malley et al. – 104.25 No Transcript Available to the Jury 8th Cir. – 1.6; (Criminal) 1.6A
9th Cir. – 1.17; (Criminal) 1.9 Previous Trial 1st Cir. (Criminal) – 1.03 8th Cir. – (Civil) 2.06; (Criminal) 2.20 9th Cir. – (Criminal) 2.15 Federal Judicial Center Pattern Criminal Jury Instruction 14 O’Malley et al. – 102.42 Sand et al. 71.01 (71-11) Publicity During O’Malley et al. – 11.08, 101.21, 102.12 Reprimand of Counsel for Misconduct Sand et al. – 71.01 (71-7) Sequestration O’Malley et al. – 10.09, 101.14 Sand et al. – 9.06 Sympathy Sand et al. – 71.01 (71-10) Tests and Experiments 9th Cir. – (Civil) 2.9 Verdict 1st Cir. – (Criminal) 6.01 - 6.06 6th Cir. – (Criminal) 8.03 7th Cir. – 1.32; (Criminal) 7.01 – 7.03 8th Cir. – (Civil) 3.6; (Criminal) 3.12 9th Cir. – (Civil) 3.5; (Criminal) 7.5 11th Cir. – (Criminal) Basic Instruction 12 O’Malley et al. – Chapter 106
8th Cir. – (Civil) Chapter 19 Sand et al. – Chapter 93 Petroleum Marketing Practices Act O’Malley et al. – Chapter 152 Party Status All Persons Equal Before the Law 7th Cir. – (Civil) 1.03 O’Malley et al. – 103.11 & 103.12 Corporation as Party 5th Cir. – (Civil) 2.16 7th Cir. – (Civil) 1.03 9th Cir. – 4.1 11th Cir. – (Civil) 3.2.2 Sand et al. – 72.01 (72-1) O’Malley et al. – 103.12 Government as Party 11th Cir. – (Civil) 3.2.3 Multiple Parties 5th Cir. – (Criminal) 1.22 – 1.23 6th Cir. - (Criminal) 2.01B-D 7th Cir. – (Civil) 1.25; (Criminal) 4.07 8th Cir – 2.08; (Criminal) 3.07 – 3.08 9th Cir. – (Civil) 1.8; (Criminal) 3.12 – 3.13 10th Cir. – (Criminal) 1.21 - 1.22 11th Cir. – (Criminal) 10.3 – 10.4 O’Malley et al. – 102.41, 103.10, 103.13, 103.14, 106.03 Railroad Employees Federal Employers’ Liability Act
1st Cir. – Railroad Employee Personal Injury 1.1 5th Cir. – (Civil) 5.1 7th Cir. – (Civil) 9.01 – 9.05 8th Cir. – (Civil) 15.00 – 15.81 9th Cir. – 6.1 - 6.7 O’Malley et al. – Chapter 155A Sand et al. – Chapter 89 Federal Safety Appliance Act 1st Cir. – Railroad Employee Personal Injury 2.1 5th Cir. – 5.2 7th Cir. – (Civil) 9.07 8th Cir. – 15.42 O’Malley et al. – Chapter 155B RICO 7th Cir. – (Criminal) Statutory Instructions, 18 U.S.C. 1961 – 1963 8th Cir. – (Criminal) 6.18.1962A – G 9th Cir. – (Criminal) 8.155 – 8.161 10th Cir. – (Criminal) 2.74 - 2.76 11th Cir. – (Civil) Chapter 7 O’Malley et al. – Chapters 56, 161 Sand et al. – Chapters 52, 84 Securities Act 5th Cir. – (Civil) 7.1 9th Cir. – (Civil) 18.1 - 18.11 11th Cir. – (Civil) Chapter 6 ABA, Model Jury Instructions: Securities Litigation O’Malley et al. – Chapter 162 Sand et al. – Chapters 82 & 83 Tax Refunds 5th Cir. – Chapter 12 O’Malley et al. – Chapter 163
114 J. Gen. Psychol. 129 (1987). B. Michael Dann & George Logan III, Jury Reform: The Arizona Experience, 79 Judicature 280 (1996). B. Michael Dann., "Learning Lessons" and "Speaking Rights": Creating Educated and Democratic Juries, 68 Ind. L.J. 1229 (1993). B. Michael Dann et al., Can Jury Innovations Improve Juror Understanding of DNA Evidence?, Champion, April 27, 2007, at 26. Dennis J. Devine et al., Jury Decision Making: 45 Years of Empirical Research on Deliberating Groups, 7 Psychol. Pub. Pol'y & L. 622 (2001). Shari Seidman Diamond, How Jurors Deal with Expert Testimony and How Judges Can Help, 16 J.L. & Pol’y 47 (2007). Shari Seidman Diamond, Beyond Fantasy and Nightmare: A Portrait of the Jury, 54 Buff. L. Rev. 717 (2006). Shari Seidman Diamond, Beth Murphy & Mary R. Rose, The “Kettleful of Law” in Real Jury Deliberations: Successes, Failures, and Next Steps, 106 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1537 (2012). Shari Seidman Diamond et al., Juror Questions During Trial: A Window into Juror Thinking, 59 Vand. L. Rev. 1927 (2006). Seidman Diamond et al., Juror Discussions During Civil Trials: Studying an Arizona Innovation, 45 Ariz. L. Rev. 1 (2003). Shari Seidman Diamond & Neil Vidmar, Jury Room Ruminations on Forbidden Topics, 87 Va. L. Rev. 1857 (2001). Bethany K. Dumas, Jury Trials: Lay Jurors, Pattern Jury Instructions, and Comprehension Issues, 67 Tenn. L. Rev. 701 (2000). Amiram Elwork et al., Juridic Decisions: In Ignorance of the Law or in Light of It?, 1 Law & Hum. Behav. 163 (1977). Amiram Elwork et al., Making Jury Instructions Understandable (1982). Victor E. Flango, Would Jurors Do a Better Job if They Could Take Notes?, 63 Judicature 436
Alan Reifman et al., Real Jurors’ Understanding of the Law in Real 16 Law & Hum. Behav. 539 (1992). David L. Rosenhan et al., Notetaking Can Aid Juror Recall, 18 Law & Hum. Behav. 53 (1994). Jessica M. Salerno & Shari Seidman Diamond, The Promise of a Cognitive Perspective on Jury Deliberation, 17 Psychonomic Bulletin & Rev. 174 (2010). Leonard B. Sand & Steven Alan Reiss, A Report on Seven Experiments Conducted by District Court Judges in the Second Circuit, 60 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 423 (1985). William W. Schwarzer, Communicating with Juries: Problems and Remedies, 69 Cal L. Rev. 731 (1981). William W. Schwarzer, Reforming Jury Trials, 1990 U. Chi. Legal F. 119. Vicki L. Smith, Prototypes in the Courtroom: Lay Representations of Legal Concepts, 61 J. Personality & Social Psychol. 857 (1991). Vicki L. Smith, Impact of Pretrial Instruction on Jurors’ Information Processing and Decision Making, 76 J. Applied Psychol. 220 (1991). Vicki L. Smith, The Feasibility and Utility of Pretrial Instruction in the Substantive Law: A Survey of Judges, 14 Law & Hum. Behav. 235 (1990). Peter Meijes Tiersma, Reforming the Language of Jury Instructions, 22 Hofstra L. Rev. 37 (1993). Jeannine Turgeon & Elizabeth A. Francis, Improving Pennsylvania’s Justice System through Jury System Innovations, 18 Widener L.J. 419 (2009). Neil Vidmar & Valerie P. Hans, American Juries: The Verdict (2007). Neil Vidmar & Matthew W. Fairness through Guidance: Jury Instruction on Punitive Damages after Philip Morris v. Williams, 2 Charleston L. Rev. 307 (2008). Ryan J. Winter & Edith Greene, Juror Decision-Making, in Handbook of Applied Cognition 739–761 (Francis Durso ed., 2nd ed. 2007).