noted that with the eLumen software that individual student data is indeed accessible to some eLumen users and that FERPA concerns are indeed an issue. Using SLO data, cohorts of students can be tracked down to how a particular individual performed on a given SLO. G. Guevara stated that such SLO performance could even trigger referral to support entities such as The Writing Center. An eLumen training is now scheduled for Friday, May 7th, with a general overview/ training being given from 10 a.m. to Noon, and a more specific session with specific questions occurring in the afternoon. G. Guevara reminded faculty that SLO reports are due on May 15th (for inclusion in the Accreditation Self Study Report) or on Sept. 15th at the very latest. L. Kamaila also raised the issue of the completion of SLO input into eLumen being a faculty evaluation issue. submitted by May 15th for inclusion in the Accreditation Self Study Report. May 7th an eLumen training is scheduled to occur and is open to all faculty. Curriculum— Redding —J. Redding stated that processing of curriculum continues and that the next meeting is on Wednesday. She further noted that there is a decided lack of curriculum to be processed at this upcoming meeting and expressed concern that such is the case. #1: Curriculum AFT Report— Mary Jones —S. Hall reported out that he has been elected and takes office on June 1st. His board consists of both experienced faculty and “new” faces. The Board is now in the process of reviewing the District’s finalized “first proposal” as it was only recently received. In response to the attempt by the District to convert certain faculty positions to managerial positions, AFT has 20 days to respond and will first meet with affected M. Jones asked that faculty forward faculty names interested in being P/T AFT representative. time
DTRW— Jenny Redding — J. Redding stated that curriculum was processed and commentary brought back to course authors. #1: Curriculum #2 Degree & Cert. Requirements DCSL— Robert Cabral — R. Cabral distributed a packet of APs for review by the Senate and requested that comments and input be forwarded to him by the end of this week, e.g., Friday, April 30th. R. Cabral requested faculty input on packet of APs be forwarded to him by Fri., April 30th. #6 District and College Gov. Structures #10 Processes for Institu. Planning Old Business Senate By-Laws Update No report was given. OC Participatory Governance Manual – R. Cabral Five main concerns were raised by the Ad Hoc Committee, according to R. Cabral, namely: (1) the need to remove the 2-year membership limitation on committees; (2) the need to retain the term “Council” for PBC; (3) the need to change faculty membership on PBC to “nine” instead of “six” in order to maintain the proper faculty ratio; (4) the fact that there is no description of the LOT committee currently included in the draft; and (5) the need to original wording from the 2006 Collegial Consultation document into description of PEPC in order to include student services and business administrative services in program review. R. Cabral will take these concerns to R. Duran at his next meeting with the College President as well as