zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
1. Mid-Term Report with detailed expenditure listing (please refer to Schedules 2 & 3). Within (6) months of Award. 2. Final Report with Yearly Financial Report/ Final Statement of Account, together with detailed expenditure listings (please refer to Schedules 2, 3 & 4). Within (1) month after the Project End Date. Reports to be submitted to AM•EI for a Two-year Education Project 1. Mid-Term Report with detailed expenditure listing (please refer to Schedules 2 & 3). Within (6) months of Award. 2. Annual Report (Year 1) together with detailed expenditure listings (please to Schedules 2 & 3) Within (1) months at the end of First Year Due Date. 3. Mid-Term Report (Year 2) (please refer to Schedules 2 & 3). Within (6) months from the 1st Year Annual Report 4. Final Report with Yearly Financial Report/ Statement of Account, together with detailed expenditure listings (please refer to Schedules 2, 3 & 4). Within (1) month after the Project End Date. 5.2 Please note that a Yearly Financial Report (please to Schedule 4 for the template), together with the detailed expenditure listing (please refer to Schedule 3 for the template) is required. 5.3 For S$20,000 or less, the Yearly Financial Report needs to be certified as correct by the CFO of the Host Institution and counter-signed by the Principal Investigator/ Project Lead. Internal and or external audit is not required. 5.4 The Principal Investigator/ Project Lead be required to submit NIL returns for Schedule 3 – Detailed Expenditure Listing & Schedule 4 – Yearly Financial Report/ Final Statement of Account to AM•EI even if there is NO expenditure incurred during the Financial Year of reporting. 5.5 The Principal Investigator/ Project Lead is to include in the report(s) any significant innovation achievements or output arising from the project. 5.6 Upon completion of the project, the Principal Investigator/ Project Lead is required to conduct a presentation at AM•EI Grand Rounds within (3) months after the submission of the Final Report and Final Statement of Accounts together with detailed expenditure listings (please refer to schedule 2, 3 & 4 for templates). 6. Ownership and Use of Assets
Annex VI: Narrative Reporting Form Save the Children International in Kosova/o Quarterly Project Report – Enhancing Social Services for Vulnerable Groups PROJECT SUMMARY: Project Title: Reporting Organization: Thematic Area: Check only one applicable option Community-based residential and day care services Home and home-based services for children and adults in need Services for victims of domestic violence and trafficking Project Location(s): Reporting Period: Specify project year and quarter Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 (Year ___ ) Key Partners / Stakeholders: Describe the main governmental or institutions you have worked with during this reporting period Project Context: (Limit to a quarter page) PROJECT ACHIEVEMENTS 2.1 Project Objectives - Results Framework Instructions:
2 N,N,N-Trimethyl-4-(2-oxoborn-3-ylidene methyl) anilinium methyl sulphate 6% 3 Homosalate (INN) 10% 4 Oxybenzone (INN) 10% Contains oxybenzone(1) 5 Entry deleted 6 2-Phenylbenzimidazole-5-sulphonic acid and its potassium, sodium and triethanolamine salts 8% expressed as acid 7 methanesulfonic acid) and its salts 10% (expressed as acid) 8 5% 9 acid and its salts 6% (expressed as acid) 10 2-Cyano-3,3-diphenyl acrylic acid, ester (Octocrylene) 10% (expressed as acid) 11 Polymer of N-{(2 and methyl] benzyl} acrylamide 6% 12 methoxycinnamate 10% 13 Ethoxylated (PEG-25 PABA) 10% 14 Isopentyl-4-methoxycinnamate (Isoamyl 10% 15 (Octyl triazone) 5%
16 (Drometrizole Trisiloxane) 15% 17 Benzoic acid, 10% 18 3-(4’-Methylbenzylidene)-dl-camphor Camphor) 4% 19 3-Benzylidene camphor (3-Benzylidene Camphor) 2% 20 2-Ethylhexyl salicylate (Octyl Salicylate) 5% 21 4-Dimethylaminobenzoate of ethyl-2-hexyl (octyl dimethyl PABA) 8% 22 acid (Benzophenone-5) and its sodium salt 5% (of acid) 23 10% 24 Monosodium salt of acid 10% (of acid) 25 10% 26 Dimethicodiethylbenzalmalonate (CAS No 207574-74-1) 10 %
appropriateness and effectiveness of the training and provide recommendations for further refinement of the training. Discussion 5. Envisaged agenda The sessions are likely to be delivered between 9am and 6pm. Current thinking is to design the training agenda as indicated in the below. Emphasis is specifically put on a “learning-by-doing” approach, with all breakout sessions (exercises) included in the formal programme. DAYS Wed 2 SEPT Thu 3 SEPT Fri 4 SEPT Sat 5 SEPT Sun 6 SEPT AM Trip to DILIJAN Module 2 Breakout Session A Module 5 Breakout Session B Breakout Session D Case I and/or II Return to YEREVAN PM Module 0 Module 1 Module 3 Module 4 Module 6 Breakout Session C In-depth discussion Lorenzo Allio 31.07.15
ANNEX A TO ASAIS AT 15 DATED 07 SEP 15 ENTRY FORM 2015 Name Rank Number Service Corps/ Regt Unit Rider Standard Novice/Intermediate/Advanced* Kit Required (kite/board/harness/wave board)* Gender BKSA number Exp date Contact Tel (mil) Civ Mob Email(s) Address Emergency contact Name Address Tel Army personnel should submit this proforma to Maj MA Jones at Postal returns to : Maj MA Jones REME Q6 Fort Halstead Kent TN13 7BP Returns are required NLT Mon 05 Oct 15. Personnel must be listed on the event nominal roll in order to qualify for travel at public expense and on-duty status.
080 1.1.5.1 (a) representing claims 090 1.1.5.2 (a) guaranteed by 100 1.1.5.1 (b) amount unencumbered 110 1.1.5.2 (b) encumbered for a period within three months 120 1.1.5.3 (b) encumbered for a period between three months and six months 130 1.1.5.4 (b) encumbered for a period between six and nine months 140 1.1.5.5 (b) encumbered for a period between nine and twelve months 150 1.1.5.6 (b) encumbered for a period greater than twelve months 152-153 1.1.6 transferable assets representing claims on or guaranteed by the European Financial Stability Facility and the European Stability Mechanism Article 416(1)(c)(iii) of REGULATION (EU) NO 575/2013 152 1.1.6.1 representing claims 153 1.1.6.2 guaranteed by 160-230 1.1.7 total shares or units in CIUs with underlying assets specified in Article 416(1) Article 416(6) of REGULATION (EU) NO 575/2013 Total market value of shares or units in CIU’s as referred to in Article 416(6) of REGULATION (EU) NO 575/2013 160 1.1.7.1 (a) underlying assets in point (a) of Article 416(1) 170 1.1.7.2 (a) underlying assets in point (b) and (c) of Article 416(1) 175 1.1.7.3 (a) underlying assets in (d) of Article 416(1) 180 1.1.7.1 (b) amount unencumbered 190 1.1.7.2 (b) amount encumbered for a period within three months 200 1.1.7.3 (b) amount encumbered for a period between three and 6 months 210 1.1.7.4 (b) amount encumbered for a period between 6 and 9 months 220 1.1.7.5 (b) amount encumbered for a period between 9 and 12 months
Applicable Standards 145.A.45(b) NDIM 145.A.45(b) IPC 145.A.45(b) Approved Organisations List 145.A.45(b) SRM 145.A.45(b) S/Ls 145.A.45(b) CCP 145.A.45(b) S/Bs 145.A.45(b) Manual Condition and Control Reader / Printer / Terminal 145.A.45(b) Condition 145.A.45(b) CD controls (CAAIP 11-25) 145.A.45(b) Availability 145.A.45(b) Serviceability 145.A.45(b) Manual Amendments 145.A.45(b) MO Produced Data Traceable to source documentation 145.A.45(d) Up to Date 145.A.45(b) Standardisation of documentation 145.A.45(e) Revision control 145.A.45(e) OEM intent 145.A.45(d) Publication and control procedure 145.A.70(a) Task itemisation 145.A.45(e) Availability 145.A.45(a)
Part 145.A.65 Safety and quality policy, maintenance procedures and quality system To Ensure Good Maintenance Practices Readily available to all staff 145.A.65(b) Human Factors principles considered 145.A.65(b) Safety and Quality Policy in MOE 145.A.65(a) Provision and control of specialised services 145.A.65(b) To Ensure Good Maintenance Practices (cont.) Review / Control Procedure 145.A.65(b) Work orders / contracts 145.A.65(b) Minimise errors on Critical Systems 145.A.65(b)3 x AMC Adequately Descriptive 145.A.65(b) Departmental Practices 145.A.65(b) Certification Procedures 145.A.65(b) Procedure Ownership 145.A.65(b) Method of Work Control and Sub-contracting 145.A.65(b)(1) Quality System Includes Findings notified to appropriate dept 145.A.65(c)(2) Remedial actions 145.A.65(c)(2) Findings clearly identified 145.A.65(c)(2)
Findings corrected in timely manner 145.A.65(c)(2) Training of Auditors 145.A.30(e) & 145.A.65 Part 145.A.70 Maintenance Organisation Exposition Accountable Managers statement signed 145.A.70(a) Scope of work reflects activity 145.A.70(a) List of sub contract organisation Nominated persons correct Capability list Minor amendments Availability Approval of changes to the MOE by the CAA 145.A.70(b) Indirect approval for minor changes to the MOE 145.A.70(c) Part 145.A.75 Privileges of the organisation a) Maintenance limited to that identified in the approval certificate at an approved location 145.A.75(a) b) Sub-contract control (The MOE must list the orgs and the controls must be equal to those applied at the primary approved company.) 145.A.75(b)
Entity to whom water output provided Duration of contract/concession Technology used No. of units, type and ratings Dates of scheduled and actual commercial operation date of each unit Principal manufacturers of major equipment General role (e.g. base load) Appendix D: Summary of BOO/BOOT Project Experience on IPPs/ IWPs/ IWPPs Appendix D: SUMMARY OF BOO/BOOT PROJECT EXPERIENCE ON IPPs/ IWPs/ IWPPs IN THE LAST 10 YEARS (to be completed by the Applicant) Name of Project Location Seawater Desalination (Yes/No) if applicable Technology Used Power / Water Capacity [MW / MIGD] Applicant’s Share of Equity Investment in percentage Dates of period of stake held Commercial Operation Date
Application Form Part A EUROPEAN COMMISSION CONNECTING EUROPE FACILITY: TRANSPORT A1 TENtec proposal number General Information Call for proposals ▼ Call priority ▼ Call sub-priority ▼ Title of the proposed Action Proposal type ▼ Start date of the proposed Action End date of the proposed Action Core or Comprehensive Network ▼ Core Network Corridor ▼ Pre-identified section ▼ Transport mode / traffic management system ▼ Summary (up to 2000 characters) Twinned proposal Is this a proposal twinned with another submitted proposal? ▼ If yes, please indicate the application number of the twinned proposal: Application Form Part A EUROPEAN COMMISSION CONNECTING EUROPE FACILITY: TRANSPORT A2 TENtec proposal number
Chapter 12A Annex 1 Application Form Application in respect of a consolidation onto an existing site Application in respect of a consolidation onto an existing site in the area of: .…………………………………………… (insert name of health and well-being board). A consolidation application must be in relation to pharmacy premises that are located within the area of a single health and wellbeing board. This is an application in respect of a consolidation onto an existing site and as such is an excepted application under regulation 26A(1) of the NHS (Pharmaceutical and Local Pharmaceutical Services) Regulations 2013 (the "Regulations"). Please complete this form as legibly as possible. Applicants should note that information provided in this form may be disclosed where this application is required to be notified to other parties or in response to a request made under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. Applicants are referred to paragraph 21 of Schedule 2 of the Regulations which sets out NHS England's responsibilities in relation to information provided in this application form which an applicant advises is confidential. Information regarding the applicant 1.1 Full name and correspondence address of the applicant (i.e. the contractor who will continue to provide services) 1.2 Applicant’s legal entity I/we am/are applying as a: (Please tick relevant box. Only one box may be selected. GPhC registration numbers only need to be provided for pharmacy applications.) Sole trader My GPhC registration number is ………………………… Partnership Please list each partner and their GPhC registration number:
4.5 Please give details of any premises facilities that are currently provided from both sites; and the services that you intend to provide from the consolidated site. Examples are listed but include others that are considered relevant. Details of premises facilities relevant to the applications Currently Provided at site 1 (Y/N) Currently provided at site 2 (Y/N) To be provided at Site 1 after consolidation (Y/N) Access for wheelchair users Access without steps Toilet for wheelchair user Induction loop Signing service Translation service Parking Disabled car parking Other Please continue on a separate sheet if necessary. 5 Information in support of the application 5.1 Please confirm that you are/will be accredited to provide all the services included in section 4 to be provided from site 1 after consolidation where that accreditation is a prerequisite for the provision of the services. Yes No 5.2 Please confirm that the premises are/will be accredited to provide all the services included in section 4 to be provided from site 1 after consolidation where that accreditation is a prerequisite for the provision of the services. Yes No 5.3 Will be any interruption to service provision? Yes No 5.4 If the answer to question 5.1 or 5.2 is “no” or the answer to question 5.3 is “yes” please give full details in the box below: Please continue on a separate sheet if necessary. 5.5 Please use the box below to explain why granting the application would not create a gap in pharmaceutical services provision that could be met by a routine application to meet a
of Indian society and continues to sustain even though formal documentation of the intangible is limited only to a few national bodies and NGO’s in India. Digital Heritage is a less explored arena in the Indian context though it is now slowly gaining momentum. All four priority research areas identified in JPICH Strategic Research Agenda are very relevant in the Indian context though applications and methods used may vary or may be adapted to suit the Indian context. In fact, there may be variations within India as each state in India has a different, culture, language, customs and traditions so a deeper understanding of each specifically to ‘connect people with heritage’ is extremely crucial. DRONAH and the Indian Heritage Cities Network Foundation are engaged along with various individual experts, government organisations and NGO’s in this field to document, exchange, learn and protect cultural resources in various sections of the country. Web links: Archaeological Survey of India National Conversation Policy JNNURM Ministry of Urban Development Ministry of Culture Indian Heritage Cities Network Israel Workshop attendee: Tamar Raviv, Supervisor of National Heritage Sites
Form 1 – Quotation Submission Form The Tenderer’s identity: Company Name: Registration Number: Registered Address: Tenderer’s Representative Name: Job Title: Representative’s contact details: Email: Telephone: Contact Address: (if different from the Registered Address above) The Tenderer offers to deliver services in accordance with the Technical requirements for the following prices: No. Product/Service Unit Quantity (minimum) Unit price EUR, excl. VAT Total Amount EUR, excl. VAT 1 Monthly rent price per m2 m2 460 + meeting rooms, etc. 2 Monthly rent price per person (workstation) 1 work station 46 2.1 Including direct rental cost of EUR, € - 2.2 Including utilities and excess parking cost of EUR, € - 3 (OPTION 1) Furnishing and equipment EUR, € per 1 workstation 29 4 (OPTION 2) Fully Equipped Meeting Rooms EUR, € / month Total / month 4.1 one meeting room for approximately 24 persons EUR, € / month 1 month 4.2 one meeting room for approximately 12 persons EUR, € / month 1 month 4.3 one meeting room for approximately 8 persons. EUR, € / month 1 month 4.4 [add any additional] EUR, € / month 1 month 5 (OPTION 3) Cleaning and maintenance services (office) and building all used areas Total 6 (OPTION 4) Business grade internet WiFi EUR, € / 1 month 7 Total amount of the Proposal EUR (excl. VAT) excluding EUR, € / month 12 months
Form 8 Declaration of honour on exclusion criteria and absence of conflict of interest (Complete or delete the parts in grey italics in parenthese) [Choose options for parts in grey between square brackets] The undersigned (insert name of the signatory of this form): in [his][her] own name (for a natural person) or representing the following legal person: (only if the economic operator is a legal person) full official name: official legal form: full official address: VAT registration number: declares that [the legal person][he][she] is not in one of the following situations: is bankrupt or being wound up, is having its affairs administered by the courts, has entered into an arrangement with creditors, has suspended business activities, is the subject of proceedings concerning those matters, or is in any analogous situation arising from a similar procedure provided for in national legislation or regulations; has been convicted of an offence concerning professional conduct by a judgment of a competent authority of a Member State which has the force of res judicata; has been guilty of grave professional misconduct proven by any means which the contracting authorities can justify including by decisions of the European Investment Bank and international organisations; is not in compliance with all its obligations relating to the payment of social security contributions and the payment of taxes in accordance with the legal provisions of the country in which it is established, with those of the country of the contracting authority and those of the country where the contract is to be performed; has been the subject of a judgement which has the force of res judicata for fraud, corruption, involvement in a criminal organisation, money laundering or any other illegal activity, where such activity is detrimental to the Union's financial interests; is subject to an administrative penalty for being guilty of misrepresenting the information required by the contracting authority as a condition of participation in a grant award procedure or another procurement procedure or failing to supply this information, or having been declared to be in serious breach of its obligations under contracts or grants covered by the Union's budget. (Only for legal persons other than Member States and local authorities, otherwise delete) declares that the natural persons with power of representation, decision-making or control over the above-mentioned legal entity are not in the situations referred to in b) and e) above;
Title_______________________________________________ Signature___________________________________________ Stamp:
No Text answer optional. Text answer 1.3 Is the policy commitment publicly available? Relevant information for the company’s answer includes: Whether and how the policy commitment is made publicly available through the company website or through other means/channels. Supplier answer Yes Please describe how your company has made the policy commitment(s) publicly available. No Text answer optional. Text answer REQUIREMENT 2: COMMUNICATING THE POLICY COMMITMENT 2.1 Has the policy commitment been communicated to the company’s employees who are involved in the performance of the contract(s)? Relevant information for the company’s answer includes: Whether and how the policy commitment is communicated to the company’s employees who are involved in the performance of the contract (e.g. through a company intranet, in induction training or other training, in meetings, in presentations by senior management or in written guidance). Supplier answer Yes Explain how the company informs employees about its commitments and responsibilities. Yes, partly Answer ‘partly’ for example if the company has a procedure in place that has not been implemented fully yet. If you answer ‘partly’, please elaborate your answer.
Capacity building workshop on satellite communications “latest developments in satellite communication technologies and ITU satellite regulations governing orbital resources”. Nairobi Safari Club, Nairobi - KENYA, 8 – 10 February, 2016 AGENDA AND WORK SCHEDULE Day 1 – Monday, 8 February, 2016 Time period Topic Speakers 09:00 – 11:00 Opening remarks ATU/ITU/ITSO/CA Introduction to Satellite communications (high technological overview, uniqueness, regulations, etc) Kezias MWALE (ATU) 11:00 – 11:30 Health break 11:30 – 13:00 The role of Satellite communications (ICTs, social-economical, safety of life and disaster relief, defence, maritime, etc) Moderator : Kezias MWALE (ATU) Astrid BONTE (Eutelsat) Rosine DZONTEU (Rascomstar) Edward Musisi (ITSO) 13:00 – 14:00 Lunch break 14:00 – 15:30 Latest developments in Satellite communication technologies (spectral and capacity, nano & pico satellites, mesh satellites, etc) Moderator : Linden Petzer (South Africa) Patrick van Niftrik (SES) Ababacar GAYE (Intelsat) Bashir Patel (Immarsat) 15:30 – 16:00 Health break 16:00 – 17:00 Case studies on actual uses of modern satellite communications Moderator : Ifeanyi OGOCHUKWU (Nigeria) Dr. Mohaned JUWAD (Avanti) Bashir Patel (Immarsat)
Day 2 – Tuesday, 9th February, 2016 Time period Topic Speakers 09:00 – 11:00 ITU Satellite regulations governing Satellite communications (general introduction to the ITU, Radio Regulations, ITU-R, RRB, etc) Moderator : Patrick van Niftrik (SES) Akim Falou-Dine (BR (ITU)) 11:00 – 11:30 Health break 11:30 – 13:00 ITU Satellite regulations governing Satellite communications (the ITU Satellite regulations taking into account WRC-15 outcomes) Moderator : Rosine DZONTEU (Rascomstar) Akim Falou-Dine (BR (ITU)) 13:00 – 14:00 Lunch break 14:00 – 15:30 ITU Satellite regulations governing Satellite communications (summary conclusions, possible future improvements, etc) Moderator : Bashir Patel (Immarsat) Akim Falou-Dine (BR (ITU)) 15:30 – 16:00 Health break 16:00 – 17:00 Role of the RRB in Satellite Regulation (including examples of this role) Moderator : Dr. Tony Azzarelli (OneWeb) Stanley K. KIBE (RRB (ITU)) Day 3 – Wednesday, 10th February, 2016 Time period Topic Speakers 09:00 – 11:00 Satellite regulations in practice: Nigerian experience Satellite regulations in practice: South African experience Moderator : Marie-Amandine COYDON (Intelsat) Ifeanyi OGOCHUKWU (Nigeria) Linden Petzer (South Africa) 11:00 – 11:30 Health break 11:30 – 13:00 Satellite regulations in practice: Inmarsat experience Satellite regulations in practice: OneWeb experience Moderator : Marie-Amandine COYDON (Intelsat) Bashir Patel (Immarsat) Dr. Tony Azzarelli (OneWeb) 13:00 – 14:00 break 14:00 – 15:30 The future of Satellite communications (technological, commercial, regulatory, etc) Moderator : Edward MUSISI (ITSO) Dr. Tony Azzarelli (OneWeb) Astrid BONTE (for/ESOA) Closing remarks ATU/ITU/ITSO
13.30 – 14.30 Room: XX Meeting with stakeholder groups:those who use or engage with the URI’s services and activities n.b. this be run as two simultaneous sessions, with half the Panel attending each. [Insert names and job titles] Maximum of 8 people per session] 14:30 – 15.15 Room: XX Meeting with the URI Steering Group [Insert names and job/role titles]. [Suggestions: Maximum of 8 people per session] 15.15 – 15.30 Comfort Break 15.30 – 16.00 Rooms: XX & XX Meeting with representatives of professional services Divisions RED, Communications and Marketing, Finance, etc. [Insert job/role titles] Maximum of 8 people per session] 16.00 – 16.30 Room: XX Private meeting of the Review Panel Review Panel only 16.30 – 17.00 Final meeting with Director of URI [insert name and job title] 17.30 – 18.00 Room: XX Feedback to all URI staff Open to all URI staff and others involved with the URI (Steering Group members, etc) 18.00 – 19.00 Drinks Open to all staff involved in the Review
Passport possession ( ) Yes ( )No of passport 7) Present Position and Current Duties Organization Department / Division Present Position Date of employment by the present organization Date Month Year Date of assignment to the present position Date Month Year 8) Type of Organization ( ) National Governmental ( ) Governmental ( ) Public Enterprise ( ) Private (profit) ( ) NGO/Private (Non-profit) ( ) University ( ) Other ( ) 9) Contact Information Home Address: (Province/State) (City) TEL: Mobile (Cell E-mail: Office Address: (City) TEL: Mobile (Cell Phone): E-mail: Contact person in emergency Name: Relationship to you: Address: (Province/State) (City) TEL: Mobile (Cell Phone): E-mail: 3. Educational Background Level Name of School / Department Location (City and Country) Number of of schooling you have attended From /To Academic Degree Example *** University Faculty of *** Nairobi, Kenya 4 Years 9/1999 to 6/2003 Month/Year Month/Year Bachelor of *** Primary Education / to / Month/Year Month/Year
Proof of Answer Dimension Economic Stakeholders Question Q27: (Our company monitors, inspects and evaluates whether our suppliers, subcontractors and other partners comply with our CSR criteria Score of question in the Self-Assessment 0 – Completely correct (5) 0 – Rather correct (4) 0 – Partly correct (3) 0 – Rather incorrect (2) 0 – Completely incorrect (1) 0 – Not applicable (0) Proof of score / Evidence Demonstrate why you scored the answer (0 – 5). Provide as much evidence as possible in maximum 1 A4 (450 words). Description Max. 1 x A4 (450 - if the description is longer only the first page will be used In your description you can refer with links to websites and other publications. Be very specific in your source of information and mention chapter, page, etc. It is not allowed only to refer to relevant documents as a proof. Annex 2: Template for the proof of Answers Dimension: LOCAL PUBLIC AUTHORITIES Proof of Answer
of question in the Self-Assessment 0 – Completely correct (5) 0 – Rather correct (4) 0 – Partly correct (3) 0 – Rather incorrect (2) 0 – Completely incorrect (1) 0 – Not applicable (0) Proof of score Proof / Evidence Demonstrate why you scored the answer (0 – 5). Provide as much evidence as possible in maximum 1 A4 (450 words). Description Max. 1 x A4 (450 - if the description is longer only the first page will be used In your description you can refer with links to websites and other publications. Be very specific in your source of information and mention chapter, page, etc. It is not allowed only to refer to relevant documents as a proof.
Form 4s submitted 145.A.30(b)2 Personnel One off authorisation reported to CAA within 7 days 145.A.30(j)5 Specialised services 145.A.30(e) & (f) Appropriate Qualifications 145.A.30(e) Production man-hours plan 145.A.30(d) Register of B1 and B2 support staff 145.A.30 Responsibilities appropriate to terms of reference and function 145.A.30(e) Sufficient certifying staff 145.A.30(d) Sufficient to plan and perform 145.A.30(d) Quality function man-hours 145.A.30(d) Job description defined 145.A.30(e) Compliance with EN 4179 145.A.30(f) Experience appropriate to function 145.A.30(e) of one off Authorisations 145.A.30(j) Compliance with Appendix IV is applicable 145.A.30(j) Competence Established in accordance with MOE 145.A.30(e) Established qualification standards 145.A.30(e) Assessment of sub contract staff 145.A.75(b)
Goods Inwards Appropriately released 145.A.42(a) Marked iaw Part 21 Subpart Q 145.A.42(a)1 Segregated 145.A.42(a) Raw material – spec and traceability 145.A.42(a)5 Standard parts 145.A.42(a)4 Eligibility Modification status 145.A.42(b) ADs 145.A.42(b) Details on Form 1 145.A.42(b) Fabrication of Parts Part No. reflects manufacturing data 145.A.42(c) Internal use only 145.A.42(c) TC, STC or DOA data 145.A.42(c) Inspected 145.A.42(c) Defined in scope of work 145.A.42(c) Correctly identified and marked 145.A.42(c) Unsalvageable 145.A.42(d) Installation of parts in ELA1 and ELA2 aircraft 145.A.42(e) Part 145.A.45 Maintenance Data Data Readily available (close proximity) 145.A.45(f)
Appropriately authorised staff with signature 145.A.50(b) CRS statement correct 145.A.50(b) Dated and life limitation (hours, cycles) AMC 145.A.50(b) Approval reference and inspection stamp legibility AMC 145.A.50(b) Operator agreement for deferred items 145.A.50(c)(e) Cross-referenced to maintenance data used i.e. Maint. 145.A.50(b) Control of PINs AMC 145.A.50(b) Uncompleted work 145.A.50(e)(c) Planning support during maintenance 145.A.47(a) No hazardous 145.A.50(a) Details of work carried out and Work Pack references 145.A.50(b) Reflects work 145.A.50(a) Programme or Task AMC 145.A.50(b) Revision status of maintenance data 145.A.50(b) Dimensional information retained AMC 145.A.50(b) Fully completed and signed 145.A.50(b) Work Sheet Control
Evidence Base (for summary sheets) Contents List of Acronyms AT – Angling Trust BMAPA – British Marine Aggregate Producers Organisation BS – Balanced Seas Conservation Zones Project BSAC – British Sub Aqua Club BSH – Broad Scale Habitat CCS – Carbon Capture and Storage CEFAS – Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science CFP – Common Fisheries Policy CVM – Contingent Valuation Method DECC – Department for Energy and Climate Change – Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs EA – Environment Agency EANCB – Estimated Annual Net Cost to Business EH – English Heritage EIA – Environmental Impact Assessment EMS – European Marine Site ENG – Ecological Network Guidance EU – European Union FCERM – Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management FOCI – Feature of Conservation Importance (including HOCI and SOCI)
FS- Finding Sanctuary Conservation Zones Project GMA – General Management Approach GVA - Gross Value Added HOCI – Habitat of Conservation Importance IA – Impact Assessment ICES – International Council for the Exploration of the Seas IFCA - Inshore Fisheries and Conservation Authority ISCZ - Irish Sea Conservation Zones JNCC - Joint Nature Conservation Committee MCAA – Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009 MCS – Marine Conservation Society MCZ – Marine Conservation Zone MEA - Millennium Ecosystem Assessment – Maritime Environmental Sustainability Appraisal Tool MMO – Marine Management Organisation MoD – Ministry of Defence MPA – Marine Protected Area MSFD – Marine Strategy Framework Directive NE – Natural England NG - Net Gain Marine Conservation Zone Project OSPAR – Oslo-Paris Convention for the Protection of the marine Environment of the Atlantic pMPA – Potential Marine Protected Area PO – Producers Organisation (Fishing) PV – Present Value RA – Reference Area RAMSAR sites - marine components of RAMSAR sites RA – Reference Areas SAC - Special of Conservation (SAC) SAP – Science Advisory SNCB – Statutory Nature Conservation Body (collective term for Natural England and the Joint Nature Conservation Committee) SOCI – Species of Conservation Importance SPA - Special Protection Areas (SPA) SSSIs - Sites of Special Scientific Interests UK BAP - UK Biodiversity Action Plan UKHO – UK Hydrographic Office UKMMAS - UK Marine Monitoring and Assessment Strategy UKNEA – UK National Ecosystem Assessment VMS – Vessel Monitoring System, used to track the location of vessels WCA – Wildlife and Countryside Act WFD – Water Framework Directive
APPLICANT/EMPLOYEE BIOGRAPHICAL DATA SHEET 1. Applicant/Employee Name (Last, Middle) 2. Contractor's Name FHI 360 3. Applicant/Employee Address (include ZIP Code) 4. Project ID No. 5. Position Under Project 6. Proposed Salary 7. Duration of Assignment 8. Telephone Number (include area code) 9. Place of Birth 10. Citizenship (if U.S citizen give Social Security Number; If non-U.S. citizen, give visa status) 11. Education (include all college or university degrees) 12. Language Proficiency (see instructions on reverse) Name & Location of Institution Major Degree Year Language Proficiency Speaking Proficiency Reading 13. Employment History Give last three (3) years. List salaries separate for each year. Continue on separate page if necessary. Employment Period (most recent first) Salary Position Title Employer Name & Address Point of Contact & Telephone # From To U.S. Dollars 14. Specific Consultant Services (give last (3) years) Services Performed Company’s Name & Address Point of Contact & Telephone # Dates of Service (MM/DD/YY) Daily Rate Days at Rate From To U.S. Dollars 15. Applicant/Employee Certification Applicant/Employee certifies in submitting this form that applicant has reasonable steps to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this form and understands that FHI 360 will make necessary contacts to verify the information. Applicant/Employee understands that FHI 360 may rely on the accuracy of such information in negotiating a rates and/or salary with the applicant. Applicant/Employee understands that the making of certifications that are false, fictitious, or fraudulent may result in appropriate remedial action by FHI 360, taking into consideration all of the pertinent facts and circumstances, which may include immediate termination of any relationship with FHI 360. Signature of Applicant/Employee: Date
Target Year 3 2020 Political parties, have committed to dialogue meet on a regular basis and interact in a collaborative manner. Institutionalisation of the dialogue platforms and consolidation (MOU, Statutes, funding Project title and country … Project objective Baseline Year 2017 Year 1 2018 Year 2 2019 Result - Target Year 3 2020
* If any, please complete the table “Additional Contributions” included in Application Form II – Project budget Has this project or the activities proposed previously been submitted for funding from Special Programme? Yes No Has this project or the activities proposed previously been submitted for funding or in-kind donations from other sources, in addition to the previous question regarding GEF funding or applications? If so, are they still awaiting confirmation? Yes No Yes No Is the viability of the project dependent on confirmation of funding or in-kind contribution that is not confirmed yet in addition to the Special Programme trust fund? Yes No 2 Contact Details 2.1 Applicant Applicant organization / institution Mr. Ms. Applicant representative (name) Functional Title Section / Department Address Phone Fax E-Mail Website address (if available) 2.2 Project Implementing (if relevant) Project implementing organization / institution Mr. Ms. Implementing representative (name)
Functional Title Section / Department Address Phone Fax E-Mail Website address (if available) 2.3 PROJECT PARTNERS (add rows for each project partner) For each partner, please provide the following information Name of the organization (s) Contact person (s) E-Mail Organizations’ role in the project: *Indicate the specific tasks for each organization 2.4 INDEPENDENT MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF THE PROJECT Organization Contact person Functional Title Section / Department Address Phone Fax
Christina Badea UNICEF Programme Officer Local Partnerships Agatha Popescu UNICEF Programme Assistant Bucharest Nicoleta Elisei UNICEF Programme Assistant Bacau National partners Ciprian Fartusnic Institute of Educational Sciences Director Marcela Claudia Calineci Institute of Educational Sciences Coordinator Parents’ Counselling subcomponent Serban Iosifescu ARACIP (Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Education System President, Head of management Subcomponent County Partners Simona Boghiu County DGSACP Chief strategy, project and monitoring Teona Cordreanu Deputy Principal at “ County Education Coordinator Focus Group Discussion with Bacau County Coordinators MPS County Coordinators from county health, education and social protection directorates County MPS coordinators 7 social protection, 7 health and 3 educations Community Partners Community visit urban community Team Targu Ocna Mayor, public administrator (social services), 1 SW, 3 school counselors, 1 school principle school, 1 community nurse, 1 school mediator Community visit rural community Team Bogdanesti Mayor, SW, community nurse, county social protection coordinator, county education coordinator, school principle, school counselor, school mediator, social assistant, general practitioner, priest, 2 beneficiaries. QIE Training for school managers and county coordinators (Around 45 school principals and regional QIE coordinators) County and community education administrators County coordinators and school managers NGOS Carmen Lica Step by Step (NGO) Executive Director Gelu Duminica Impreuna (NGO) Executive Director Stefan Cojocaru HoltIS (NGO) Executive Director Delia Elena Rusu HoltIs (NGO) Programme Officer Alexdandra Galbin HoltIs (NGO) Programme Officer Dana Otilia Farcașanu CPSS: Center for Health Policies. Executive Director Mirela Mustață CPSS: Center for Health Policies Communication and Public Relation Specialist Interview guide (KII) General information:
the example thresholds in Table 2, the models enable decision-makers to evaluate the levels of loads and load reductions necessary to achieve target values they may choose. 2. Loads (MT) needed to achieve example ERI thresholds. For cyanobacteria, the threshold differed among models (see text). March - June Maumee River loads were assumed to be 50% of the annual river load, while March– July Maumee River loads were 53% of the annual load, which was in turn assumed to be 45% of the whole Western Basin annual load. For phytoplankton, Western Basin annual loads refer to a 50% reduction in maximum chlorophyll-a concentration reported by each model. The threshold for Central Basin hypoxic area extent was set to 2000 km2, while a threshold for Central Basin dissolved oxygen was set to 4 mg/L. For Cladophora, we set a threshold total dry weight biomass of less than 30 g/m2. Model Maumee spring load to achieve threshold Maumee annual load to achieve threshold WB annual load to achieve threshold WB + CB annual load to achieve threshold Whole lake annual load to achieve threshold Cyanobacteria Obenour_2008 1230 2460 5467 Obenour_2013 500 1000 2222 Stumpf 1080 2038 4528 1021 1926 4281 Western Basin Phytoplankton Chapra 2600 EcoLE 3010 ELCOM-CAEDYM 1130 WLEEM 2030 Hypoxic Area EcoLE_1-3m 5955 EcoLE_1m 3415 4920 9-Box 1150 Rucinski 4830 Rucinski_WLEEM 3880 Dissolved Oxygen EcoLE_1-3m 4400 EcoLE_1m 2600 ELCOM-CAEDYM 3100 Rucinski 5100 Rucinski_WLEEM 4000
Inception Report Detailed project execution plan Detailed desk and site investigation methodology including planned necessary approvals from the authorities to conduct site investigation CD (date of commecement) + 2 Interim Report Analysis of existing archive documents Approvals for site investigations CD + 6 weeks Report Technical inspection report, combining archive information and site investigation data CD + 10 weeks Inspection approvals and certificates. It is the responsibility of the Contractor to receive all necessary approvals from all the authorities to do the inspections, for example, from SJSC “Latvijas Dzelzceļš”, Riga City Council (including Traffic Department), Heritage Protection Inspectorate and any other authorities/institutions involved. All costs for such approvals and any arising supportive activities as required by the above mentioned involved institutions, if any, shall be covered by the Contractor. For the inspection the Contractor shall ensure certified personal and experts as required by the national law and legislation for such type of the inspection. The Contractor shall have all certificates for the employment of the proposed technology and machinery, if required by the national law and legislation for such type of the inspection on site. Assumptions for the Consulting services timetable. The of the Consultant services has been prepared with the assumption that the open procurement will be carried out and following contract concluded without delays. The commencement of the services planned in January 2018. Contractor’s obligations For the provision of services the Contractor remain fully responsible for the results of its services during and after the provision of services. Any additional expenses arisen due to the correction of the unacceptable results shall be covered solely by the Contractor. On reasonable grounds Contracting authority reserves the right to request the Contractor to correct the results of its services regardless whether it is necessary during the period of service provision or after completion of thereof. In case Contracting authority founds (at any time of procurement process or during the implementation of the Contract for the provision of services) that provided information on education, experience of a Tenderer is found to be false, a Tenderer shall be eliminated from the
consultation with the departmental EXCO and the EA HOD monitor the implementation of the system and inform the EA 78 71.(7) (7) Heads of department shall ensure that accurate records of all performance assessments and the outcomes thereof are kept. HOD Head of HR Not Delegated Not Delegated 79 72.(4)(c) Performance agreements and assessments (4) If both the employee and his or her supervisor do not sign the performance agreement or an agreement of similar nature due to a dispute relating to the content of the agreement, a person shall be appointed within one month after the expiry of the period stipulated in subregulation (1), to consider the dispute. Such person shall be appointed in the following manner: (c) in the case of other employees, the appointment shall be made by the relevant executive authority, provided that the person so appointed, shall be an employee. EA HOD L13-L15 Not delegated DDG: L1-11/12 CD: L1-9/10 D: L1-8 CD: L1-9/10 D: L1-8 CD: L1-9/10 D: L1-8 HOD for L13-L154 80 72.(9) (9) The head of department shall ensure that the outcomes of the annual performance assessments are implemented by 31 December of the financial year following the year of the assessment. HOD Head Corporate Services Not Delegated Not Delegated 81 72.(14) (14) An executive authority shall inform the employee of the outcome of his or her performance assessment. EA Head Corporate Services Not Delegated Not Delegated 82 72.(15)(b) and (c) (15) Based on the outcome of the performance assessment an executive authority – (b) may, where appropriate, provide training and development for employees; (c) shall manage poor performance. EA Head of Branch L1 to L14 Head of Region Head of Region HOD for L15 HR facilitate with the co-operation of supervisors 83 73.(1) Rewarding performance (1) Each executive authority shall establish a performance incentive scheme to reward employees or any category of employees within the limits determined by the Minister as contemplated in subregulation (3). EA Head Corporate Services Not Delegated Not Delegated HOD approve scheme after consultation with the departmental EXCO and the EA HOD monitor the implementation of the system and inform the EA
Advances in Spatial Data Handling and GIS: 14th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling (Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography) 9783642259258 Eds.:. Yeh, Shi, Zhou Springer Geoinformation Technologies for Geo-Cultural Landscapes: European Perspectives 9780415468596 Evelpidou, Bender, Krek CRC Press Particularly Sensitive Sea Areas: The IMO's Role in Protecting Vulnerable Marine Areas (Hamburg Studies on Maritime Affairs) 9783540787785 Kachel, M. Springer Nitrous Oxide and Climate Change 9781844077571 K. Routledge Mind the Future Compendium for Contemporary Trends 9783899554090 Sigrist, S. Gestalten Verlag Neue Zuricher Zeitung Water Quality. Physical, Chemical and Biological Characteristics 9781607416333 Ertueth, Nova Science Publishers Semantic Web for the working ontologist : effective modeling in RDFS and OWL 9780123859655 Allemang, D. Morgan Kaufmann Climate and disaster resilience in cities (Hardcover) 9780857243195 Shaw, R. Emerald Group Publishing Limited Scenario planning : the link between future and strategy 9780230579194 Lindgren, M. Palgrave Macmillan Global think tanks : policy networks and governance 9780415779791 McGann, J. Routledge Book ISBN Author Publisher Price in EUR (all-inclusive and final) Environmental Governance in Europe (paperback) 9780199257478 Weale, Pridham, Cini (et al, eds.) Oxford University Press GIS Cartography 9781420082135 Peterson, G. Taylor & Francis
Annex 3: presentation to REB, 7th February 2014 Attached. Annex 4: revised assignment plan week commencing 2014 Activities outputs results responsible 10/2 17/2 24/2 3/3 10/3 17/3 24/3 31/3 7/4 14/4 21/4 28/4 Review mandate and responsibilities RIs, DEOs and SEOs; present proposed job descriptions Updated job descriptions for RIs, DEOs and SEOs Consultant/ Imke van der Honing Feedback from REB on JDs REB ppt to MINEDUC, MINALOC and other stakeholders highlighting the areas of concern REB New job descriptions approved and agreed by all stakeholders REB/ MIFOTRA Organise regional workshops, explaining proposed roles and revised job descriptions for all RIs, DEOs and SEOs Kigali City Consultant/ Joanne Erin Chu and REB 25 Northern Region 27 Southern Region 1 Eastern Region 3 Eastern Region 8 Conduct Capacity needs assessment for RIs, DEOs and SEOs assessment activities included in Regional workshops Consultant, Joanne Ferry Report on training needs for RIs, DEOs and SEOs Consultant; Joanne Ferry and Erin Chu Draft training plan based on training needs, and draft ToR Consultant, Erin Chu
Annex A: DEFINITIONS AND COMMON TERMS The following capitalized terms shall be ascribed the following meaning for the purposes of the Agreement: “Affiliate”, in relation to any company: (i) a company which is either a holding company or a subsidiary of such company; or (ii) a company which is a subsidiary of a holding company of which such company is also a subsidiary. “Agreement”, this Agreement between the Parties, together with all Annexes thereto. “Alteration”, any material change to the Scope of Service, Service Schedule or Service Milestone which is not the result of the ordinary process of developing the scope and detail of the Project. “Alteration Request”, as defined in accordance with Clause 2.3 of the Agreement. “Applicable Law” or “Law”, any legislative act, regulation, decree, order, ordinance, statute, treaty, directive, judgment, or other legislative measure. For the avoidance of any doubt, the term “Applicable Law” shall include any legislative act or directive relevant to public procurement. “Approved Sub-Contractor”, any person or organization listed pursuant to Annex F (List of Approved Sub-Contractors), which is in a contractual relationship with the Service Provider to provide a part of the Service. “Beneficiary/Beneficiaries”, any of the following bodies: (i) the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications of the Republic of Estonia; (ii) the Ministry of Transport of the Republic of Latvia; and The Ministry of Transport and Communications of the Republic of Lithuania. “Change in Standards”, the coming into effect of a CEF Standard and Grant Agreement Standard or of any amendment thereto, or of a Service Provider Standard or of any amendment thereto, with which the Service Provider is obliged to comply. “Completion Date”, as defined in accordance with Clause 7.6 or 7.7, as appropriate. “Completion Certificate”, as defined in accordance with Clause 7.7. “Confidential Information”, as defined in accordance with Clause 10.1 of the Agreement. “Costs”, direct costs reasonably incurred in relation to the Project or any act or series of acts required under the Agreement. Specifically, Costs shall include any of the following: