zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
STATUTORY DECLARATION - ORGANISATION I, __________________________[print full name] solemnly and sincerely declare that: I am authorised to provide this declaration on the applicant organisation’s behalf. The information contained in this document is true and correct. The information contained in this document is a true reflection of the applicant organisation’s capability and experience. I acknowledge that IPART may undertake searches or request further information necessary to verify that the application is made on behalf of a bona fide organisation, and that the information contained in all parts of the application is true and correct. I make this solemn declaration conscientiously believing the same to be true, and by virtue of the provisions of the Oaths Act 1900 (NSW). Made and subscribed at: In New South Wales On: [Date] Signed by Company Director/Company Secretary/Authorised Representative [Signature of declarant] name of declarant] [Position/title of declarant] In the presence of an authorised witness, who states: I, [Print full name of witness] a [Qualification of witness] certify the following matters concerning the making of this statutory declaration by the person who made it: [*please cross out any text that does not apply] 1. I saw the face of the person OR *I did not see the face of the person because the person was wearing a face covering, but I am satisfied that the person had a special justification for not removing the covering, and 2. I have known the person for at least 12 months OR *I have confirmed the person’s identity using an identification document and the document I relied on was
Audit plan exam checklist File number Plan number Examiner Date PLAN General Standard of drafting satisfactory 1 Yes No Plan agrees with the Abstract of Field Records Yes No Dimensions of the lots correct and complete Yes No Dimensions rounded correctly 2 Yes No Lot closures and areas correct N/A Yes No Street names and abuttals correct Yes No Parcel numbering (lots, roads, reserves, common property) correct 3 Yes No All sheets signed, and numbered correctly 4 Yes No Page margins and panels correct Yes No Notations Crown description correct Yes No Title reference(s) correct Yes No Last plan reference(s) correct Yes No coordinates of approx. centre of parcel correct Yes No Depth limitation correct Yes No Registered numbers of PMs connected to shown in relevant notation N/A Yes No Owners Corporations notations present and correct N/A Yes No
2.9 Purchase of services The organisation shall have a purchasing process which includes health and safety requirements for services provided by its contractors. Evidence analysed Result Score Documentation [Add documentation observed] Staff interviews [Add site evidence observed] Nothing in place Major non-conformance Minor non-conformance Compliance Non audited / Not applicable Findings Observations [Add observations] non-conformance [Add non-conformance ] Major non-conformance [Add major non-conformance ] Recommendations for improvement [Add recommendations]
2.13 Emergency preparedness and response The organisation shall identify all potential emergency situations and document a process for preventing and mitigating the associated illness or injury. Evidence analysed Result Score Documentation [Add documentation observed] Staff interviews [Add site evidence observed] Nothing in place Major non-conformance Minor non-conformance Compliance Non audited / Not applicable Findings Observations [Add observations] Minor non-conformance [Add minor non-conformance ] Major non-conformance [Add non-conformance ] Recommendations for improvement [Add recommendations]
Audit Ref No: Action Plan Report Author/ Audit Lead: Audit Sponsor: Which committee was the actions plan signed off: Sign-off Date: SMART/Management Action Plan/ Recommendations Action plan priority grading’s: Ref. Gap identified/Risk area Recommendation Action Priority Action Lead/ Owner Date Management Comments (How will you know that actions are completed?) 1. 2. 3. Notes:
5. Publications and proactive information standards Standard 5.1: Adequate systems are in place to ensure quality Delete for report Factors to consider during assessment: Are procedures in place to guide production? Is the ‘Project’ facility in MiDatabank used for publications and other proactive work? Is all proactive information checked for readability and grammar? Is all proactive information checked for accuracy? Is documentation retained identifying authors and checkers? Evidence: Comments, advice, commendations: Comments, advice appropriate: Comments, advice where appropriate: Action plan and review dates where appropriate: Standard 5.2: Proactive information meets the needs of the target audience Delete for report Factors to consider during assessment: Has the target audience had the opportunity to comment on whether the publication their needs? (It may not be possible to assess this if you are contributing rather than leading on the workstream). Is there a stakeholder group that contributes to content of publication? Stakeholders may include primary care, secondary care, SLA holders, commissioners. Is a stakeholder group that addresses organisation needs in terms of proactive publications? Evidence: Comments, advice, commendations: Comments, advice where appropriate: Comments, advice where appropriate: Action plan and review dates where appropriate:
Facility: Ward/Emergency Department: MRN: Gastric Tube inserted Time: (24 hour Date: Indications for insertion Nutritional needs Administering medications Rehydration Decompression of the stomach Adverse outcome/s for patient Yes No Not documented If so, please indicate type of adverse event: Documentation Was the following documented in the child’s progress notes / nursing care plan Type/Size of tube External length of tube at nostril Aspirate obtained pH of aspirate Attempts at insertion Yes No Not documented Yes No Not documented Yes No Not documented Yes pH No Not documented Number Not documented Confirmation of Placement Placement confirmed by: pH indicator strip X-ray or Ultrasound Other method Yes No Not documented Yes No Not documented Yes State Which Post insertion, observations documented on specific observation chart i.e. SPOC, EDSPOC, SNOC, eMR Yes No Not documented Placement re-confirmed prior to the administration of fluids or medications Yes No Not documented If continuous feeds, was placement reconfirmed at least once per shift Yes No Not documented Comments: Name of Auditor: Designation: COMPLETING THE AUDIT TOOL
Lana Thompson 7 7 Kym Georgiou (appointed on 22/10/2015) 5 4 Sue Shoobridge (appointed on 01/07/2016) 1 1 Scott Marston (appointed on 01/07/2016) 1 1 Contributions on winding up In the event of the company being wound up, each member is required to contribute a maximum of $1.00 each.
24. Which of the following types of auditors' reports does not require an explanatory paragraph to support the opinion? AACSB: Communication AICPA BB: Legal AICPA FN: Reporting Blooms: Remember Difficulty: 1 Easy Learning Objective: 02-04 Understand the fundamental principle of reporting and identify the basic contents of the auditors' report. Source: Original Topic: Auditors' Report 25. Which of the following is an element of a system of quality control that should be considered by a public accounting firm in establishing its quality control policies and procedures?
7.10 Are written procedures available for handling of receipt, identification, quarantine, storage, sampling, testing, approval or rejection of materials? 7.11 System to evaluate suppliers of critical materials in place? Evaluation must show that supplier can consistently provide material meeting specifications (7.31) 7.12 Materials purchased against agreed specifications? Purchased from an approved (by QU) supplier? 7.13 If supplier is not the manufacturer, is the original manufacturer 7.14 Change of source/supplier handled according to Change Control procedures (chap. 13)? 7.2 Receipt and Quarantine 7.20 Upon receipt materials visually examined for correct labeling container damage broken seals tampering or contamination Are materials held under quarantine until released for use? How is this done? 7.21 Incoming materials are released before mixed with existing stocks? Are procedures in place to prevent discharging materials wrongly?
7.35 Are containers from which samples are taken identified? 7.4 Storage 7.40 Is material stored in a manner to prevent degradation and contamination? 7.41 Are drums, bags and boxes stored off the floor? Is stored material suitably spaced to permit cleaning and inspection? 7.42 Do materials met their respective storage conditions? Is the FIFO principle followed? 7.43 In case materials is stored outdoors: do labels remain legible are the containers cleaned before opening is it described in a procedure 7.44 How are rejected materials held under a quarantine system? 8 Production and In Process Controls 8.1 Production Operations 8.10 Are weighing and measuring devices of suitable accuracy for intended use? Are the devices periodically calibrated with certified references? 8.11 Do containers with subdivided material contain the following information: name of material code or control number weight, if applicable retest date, if applicable
distribution records authentic certificate of analysis, including those of the original manufacturer expiry/retest date 17.3 Quality Management 17.30 Has the established a system of managing quality as defined in section 2? 17.4 Repackaging, Relabeling and Holding of APIs and IM 17.40 How does the Agent ensure that during repackaging, relabeling and holding of APIs/IM no mix-ups and loss of identity and purity of the API/IM occurs? Are these operations conducted under conditions described in Q7? 17.41 Is repackaging done under conditions to avoid contamination? 17.5 Stability 17.50 Are stability studies conducted if the API is repacked in a different type of container? 17.6 Transfer of Documentation 17.60 Does the Agent transfer all quality and regulatory information from the original manufacturer to the customer? 17.61 Does the agent provide the name of the original manufacturer and the batch number to the customer? 17.63 Is the specific guidance for Certificates of Analysis described in section 11.4 followed? 17.7 Handling of Complaints and Recalls
Walvoord, B.E. and V.J. Anderson. 1998. Effective grading: A tool for learning and assessment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Wheeler, S., R. Dusenbury, and J. Reimers. 1997. Projecting Sample Misstatement to Audit Populations: Theoretical, Professional, and Empirical Considerations. Decision Sciences (Spring): 261-278. Worrell, J.L. 2010. Blazer Communications: A Procurement Simulation. Issues in Accounting Education 25 (3): 527-546. FIGURE 1 ILLUSTRATION OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING CLASSROOM TABLE 1 AUDIT CASES ALIGNED WITH COURSE CONCEPTS Chapter* Topic Apollo** Case Description 1 Auditing and Assurance Services Boylan 2008 Students role-play managers and auditors while estimating an uncertain value to experience many dynamics of an audit environment 2 Professional Standards X Case 1 – Audit Quality Indicators Evaluate predictors of quality in context of proposed regulatory changes 3 Engagement Planning X Worrell 2010 Evaluate evidence (interview recordings, policy and procedure manuals, process maps and narratives, transactional data) to the procurement process. 4 Management Fraud & Audit Risk X Earley & Phillips 2008 Assess business and accounting risks then propose related modifications to audit plan 5 Risk Assessment: Internal Control Evaluation X Dickins & Fay 2015 Classify internal controls in COSO categories and identify deficiencies in design
6 Employee Fraud and the Audit of Cash X Braun & Stallworth 2009 Consider the implications of employee fraud identified 7 Revenue and Collection Cycle X Miller & Savage 2009 Design procedures, vouch transactions to supporting documentation, and prepare workpapers for revenue transactions. 8 Acquisition and Expenditure Cycle X Bagley & Harp 2012 Prepare electronic workpapers and communicate with client to complete audit of property, plant and equipment 9 Production Cycle X ***Green 2013 Provides a hands-on approach for the inspection of inventory as students evaluate related assertions 10 Finance and Investment Cycle X (Liabilities) ***Dutta, Caplan & Marcinko 2014 Analyze corporate governance and the application of accounting techniques (investment accounting, measurement of goodwill, and consolidation accounting) for an actual Japanese company with fraudulent financial statements 11 Completing the Audit X Popova & Stein 2015 Consider the going concern issue at the conclusion of an audit 12 Reports on Audited Financial Statements X Fay & Stein 2015 Students analyze audit reports of real public and private companies, research audit standards, and evaluate proposed changes to report format Module A Other Public Accounting Services Reisch & 2005 Determine whether indirect are being allocated to women’s sports in compliance with Title IX, the federal law promoting gender equity in collegiate athletics Higgs & Reisch 2002 Evaluate scenarios to determine a university’s compliance with laws and regulatory requirements, internal policies, and NCAA rules and regulations Modules B-C Professional Ethics & Liability Reisch 1999 Students conduct a mock trial on a case involving litigation between external auditors and shareholders who lost billions
• Error Location: to ensure that the wrong server can be quickly indicated when data corruption is detected. Definitions of Our Auditing Scheme Our auditing scheme consists of procedures: Setup, Audit and Repair. Each procedure contains certain polynomial-time algorithms as follows: Setup: The data owner maintains this procedure to initialize the auditing scheme. KeyGen(1κ) → (pk, sk): This polynomial-time algorithm is run by the data owner to initialize its public and secret parameters by taking a security parameter κ as input. Degelation(sk) → (x): This algorithm represents the interaction between the data owner and proxy. The data owner delivers partial secret key x to the proxy through a secure approach. Sig And BlockGen (sk, F) → t): This polynomial time algorithm is run by the data owner and takes the secret parameter sk and the original file F as input, and then outputs a coded block set , an authenticator set _ and a file tag t. Audit: The cloud servers and TPA interact with one another to take a random sample on the blocks and check the data intactness in this procedure. → (C): This algorithm is performed by the TPA with the information of the file Finfo as input and a challenge C as output. ProofGen(C,_, ) → (P): This algorithm is run by each cloud server with input challenge C, coded block set and authenticator set _, then it outputs a proof P. Verify(P, pk, C) → (0, 1): This algorithm is run by TPA immediately after a proof is received. Taking the proof P, public parameter pk and the corresponding challenge C as input, it outputs 1 if the verification passed and 0 otherwise. Repair: In the absence of the data owner, the proxy interacts with the cloud servers during this procedure to repair the wrong server detected by the auditing process.
- Two or Three Button Mouse Monitor - SVGA S/W System Configuration:- Operating System :Windows/XP/7. Application Server : Tomcat5.0/6.X Front End : HTML, Java, Jsp Scripts : JavaScript. Server side Script : Java Server Pages. Database : Mysql 5.0 Database Connectivity : JDBC.
Does the organization have Internal Audit procedures and do they: Conform to the requirements of the International Standard and relevant legislation or regulations; Conform to the identified information security requirements; Are effectively implemented and maintained; and Perform as expected? Are all security - related processes and procedures audited at least once per year? Does the organization continually improve the effectiveness of its BIA through the use of: Policy and objectives Audit results Analysis of data Corrective and preventive actions Management review? Summary All organizations are subject to incidents and disruptions of operations resulting from terrorist or cyber-attack, natural disasters such as hurricanes, earthquakes, or floods, or internal occurrences such as fires, utility outages, hacking, or HAZMAT spills. Business Impact Analysis, when merged with an organization’s overall Risk Management strategy, identifies and defines potential threats in of operational and financial consequences. More importantly, BIA helps Management to predict and prepare for incidents, and in doing so, mitigate or minimize them. Good managers do BIA – good auditors help. Chapter Four – Business Continuity Management Overview Organizations need to make Security a key mission, and then approach it like any other: establish policies and procedures, identify threats, conduct risk assessments, implement processes, identify corrective actions, train/qualify key people, and establish a mindset of continuous improvement. And audit. It is my hope that managers and auditors will to want create, maintain, and continually improve robust organizational security programs and track them on a daily basis, as they would with any other indispensable business function. Points/Review The impact of a natural or man-made incident to an organization can be minor, major, or disastrous, depending on not only the magnitude of the incident, but also on the organization’s ability to anticipate that incident, defend the organization from it, and mitigate its effects as quickly and safely as possible.
McGivern, G. and Ferlie, E. (2007) Playing tick-box games: Interrelating defences in professional appraisal. Human Relations, Volume 60, 1361–1385. McNair, C.J. (1991) Proper compromises: The management control dilemma in public accounting and its impact on auditor behaviour. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16: 635–53. Morrell, K. and M. Learmonth (2016) Against Evidence-Based Management, for Management Learning. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 14, 520–533. Mowles, C. (2010) Post-Foundational Development Management: Power, Politics and Complexity. Public Administration and Development, 30, 149–158. Mowles, C. (2011) Rethinking Management: radical insights from the complexity sciences. London: Gower. Mowles, C. (2013) Evaluation, complexity, uncertainty: theories of change and some alternatives. In T. Wallace, T., F. Porter, and M. Ralph-Bowman (Eds.), Aid, NGOs and the reality of women’s lives: a perfect storm (pp.47-61). Rugby: Practical Action Publications. Mowles, C. (2015) Managing in Uncertainty: Complexity and the Paradoxes of Everyday Organisational Life. London: Routledge.
“Determination” means the written documentation of a decision by the procurement manager including findings of fact supporting a decision. A determination becomes part of the procurement file to which it pertains. “DFA” means the Department of Finance and Administration for the State of New Mexico. “DFA/CRB” means the Department of Finance and Administration, Contracts Review Bureau. “Evaluation Committee” a body appointed by the Agency management to evaluate offeror proposals. “Evaluation Committee Report” means a document prepared by the Procurement Manager and the Evaluation Committee for submission to the State Auditor for contract award. It contains all written determinations resulting from the procurement. “Finalist” is defined as an offeror who all the mandatory specifications of this Request for Proposals and whose score on evaluation factors is sufficiently high to merit further consideration by the Evaluation Committee. “FY” means Fiscal Year. “HSD” the New Mexico Human Services Department, the Department. “IPA” Independent Public Accountant. “Mandatory” The terms “must”, “shall”, “will”, “is required”, or “are required”, identify a mandatory item or factor (as opposed to “desirable”). Failure to meet a mandatory item or factor will result in the rejection of the offeror's proposal. “NMSA” means New Mexico Statutes Annotated 1978. “Offeror” is any person, corporation, or partnership which chooses to submit a proposal. “OSA” means Office of the State Auditor. “Procurement Manager” means the person or designee authorized by the Agency to manage or administer a procurement requiring the evaluation of competitive sealed proposals; the only person authorized to respond to questions regarding the scope of services to be performed under this RFP. “Request for Proposals” or “RFP” all documents, including those attached or incorporated by reference, used for soliciting proposals.
Symphonic Band Audition Centers September 5th – 1:00-3:30pm September 6th – contact adjudicator (auditions must be completed by 3:00pm) Clarinets/Bass Clarinet – FAC 13 Flutes – FAC 43 Percussion/Oboe/Bassoon – Band Hall/sign up at FAC 128 (Oboe/Bassoon in FAC 128) Saxophone – FAC 113 Trombones/Trumpet – FAC 14c Horn/Euphonium/Tuba – FAC 15
PVA AUDITION DATES 2018-2019 PVA High School Audition Calendar 2018-2019 Event Magnet Location Dates Time Audition Prep AHS Primes Studio 39 November 15 November 28 6 PM BHS Primes Broadneck HS October 25 November 29 Auditions All Students Bates Middle School December 8 Sign up for an audition date and time in your online magnet application Brooklyn Park Middle School January 5 Snow Dates for Auditions All Students Bates Middle School December 15 Arrive at your originally scheduled time Brooklyn Park Middle School January 12 January 19 The on-time 2018-2019 Magnet Application will open on October 15, 2018 and close at NOON on November 30, 2018. Applications are only considered from residents of Anne Arundel County. Applications are accepted from 5th and 8th grade students interested in attending a Magnet Program in 2019-2020 PVA Middle School Audition Calendar 2018-2019 Event Magnet Location Dates Time Audition Prep All Students Bates Middle School November 28 6 PM Brooklyn Park Middle School November 29 Auditions All Students Bates Middle School December 8 Sign up for an audition date and time in your online magnet application Brooklyn Park Middle School January 5 Snow Dates for Auditions All Students Middle School December 15 Arrive at your originally scheduled time Brooklyn Park Middle School January 12 January 19
(Put on princess crown) Are you nuts? King Xerxes loves Haman. He’s like the president of his fan club. Besides…. the law says if anyone appears before the king without an invitation, they’ll instantly be killed. And that includes Queens! SQ – Narrator V.O. But Mordecai said… (Put on beard) If you don’t, all our people will be killed. SQ – Narrator V.O. And Esther said… (Put on princess crown) But if I do, I could be killed.
Scene # 8: Act I, Scene 1 MONTAGUE Who set this ancient quarrel new abroach? nephew, were you by when it began? BENVOLIO Here were the servants of your adversary, And yours, close fighting ere I did approach: I drew to part them: in the instant came The fiery Tybalt, with his sword prepared, as he breathed defiance to my ears, He about his head and cut the winds, Who nothing hurt withal hiss'd him in scorn: we were interchanging thrusts and blows, Came more and more and fought on part and part, Till the prince came, who parted either part. LADY MONTAGUE O, where is Romeo? Saw you him to-day? glad I am he was not at this fray. BENVOLIO Madam, an hour before the worshipp'd sun Peer'd forth the golden window of the east, A troubled mind me to walk abroad; Where, underneath the grove of sycamore, So early walking did I see your son: Towards him I made, but he was ware of me And stole into the covert of the wood: I, measuring his affections by my own, That most are busied when they're most alone, Pursued my humour not pursuing his, And gladly shunn'd who gladly fled from me.
Physicalization Student made specific and original physical choices at an exceptional level incorporating all the techniques of: gestures, body movements, and facial expressions. Student made specific physical choices at an acceptable level incorporating most of the techniques of: gestures, body movements, and facial expressions. Student made some physical choices that were appropriate for the character incorporating 2 of the following techniques: gestures, body movements, and facial expressions. Student attempted some physical choices that were appropriate for the character incorporating 1 of the following: gestures, body movements and facial expressions. Student made inappropriate physical choices and/or was missing all of the following: gestures, body movements, and facial expressions. Student did not make any physical choices. Focus Stage Presence Student was concentrated and focused, and has an exceptional presence. Student was concentrated and focused and has an acceptable level of stage presence. Student was concentrated and focused and has an appropriate level of stage presence. Student was occasionally unfocused and had problems concentrating. Student was completely unfocused and did not concentrate. Student did not perform. Memorization Student was completely memorized and had the ability to start/stop at any point of the monologue. Student was memorized for performance but struggled with starting/stopping at any point of the monologue. Student was mostly memorized with occasional struggling for lines during the performance and start/stop. Student attempted to perform but had limited memorization and/or could not start/stop. Student had almost no memorization (used paper but looked up occasionally). Student was not memorized at all (used paper or did not perform). Time Performance time was 2 minutes exactly. Performance time was minutes. Performance time was Performance time was more than 2 minutes. Performance time was less than 1:20. Student did not perform. Presentation Student was dressed using the given guidelines (could move, dressed up, etc) Student was dressed appropriately for school, but did not necessarily follow the given guidelines. Student was inappropriately dressed (could not move easily, clothing not appropriate for school, etc) Student did not perform. Direction Student took direction exceptionally well and was able to adjust monologue as directed. Student took direction well and was able to adjust monologue as directed with limited ability. Student could take direction appropriately but was not able to adjust their monologue as directed. Student attempted to take direction but was not able to adjust monologue as directed. Student did not take direction appropriately and did not adjust their monologue as directed. Student did not change or take any direction. Point Total
dance/movement ability would be useful (though not essential) for the crap shooting sequence. Audition pieces: Song: Luck Be A Lady (up to chorus entrance) Lib: P17 from ‘Nathan! You old promoter, you!’ to P20 ‘the colour of the necktie you have on’ Sarah Brown: Female. Soprano to High A. Playing age 18 – 35. Lead role. Conventional, respectable and principled, is initially a little too for her own good. She has genuine passion for her calling and compassion for her ‘fold’ but gives Sky an initial frosty response. The actress playing this role has to play convincingly drunk, when under the influence of alcohol she allows her straight-laced persona to slip and falls exuberantly and madly in love. She goes on a journey of reconciling her feelings with her beliefs, and changing some of her prejudices so that her head can follow her heart. Audition pieces: Song: If I Were a Bell Lib: p23 from ‘Didn’t I see you a little while ago on Broadway?’ to p26 ‘you’re lying’ Nathan Detroit: Male. Baritone to High F. Playing age 35 – 50. Lead role. Organiser of the floating crap game. With a tendency towards neuroticism Nathan is a lovable rogue who is always struggling to stay one step ahead of the pack and looking for the big break he never seems to get. Funny, frustrated but romantic his heart is torn between the camaraderie of his gambling circle and the woman he loves. Audition pieces: Song: Sue Me (his part in the middle) Lib: From p37 ‘Hello Nathan’ – p40 ‘Five’ Adelaide: Female. Mezzo to A. Playing age 30s to 40s. Lead role Lead performer at the ‘Hot Box’ a somewhat tacky and dodgy cabaret joint. Strong comic actress required with dancing ability and ability to carry off a basque and stockings. She spends the whole show with the symptoms of a cold, acting through sneezes and congestion. She adores Nathan but is driven crazy by his antics with the gambling ring and having been engaged to him for 15 years. Audition pieces: Song: Adelaide’s Lament Lib: From p37 ‘Hello Nathan’ – p40 ‘Five’
Audition Packet for “She Kills Monsters” This play follows Agnes Evans as she attempts to understand the life of her deceased younger sister, Tilly. She finds a Dungeons & Dragons module written by Tilly, and through playing it, comes to understand the sister that she never really knew. There will be over a half-dozen combat scenes, adventure-style costumes (tasteful, of course), several puppets and furry monsters, and even a dance-off. Auditions will take place on Thursday, September 22, with callbacks the next day. The cast list will be posted over that weekend and first will take place on Monday, September 26. Crew applications will be available next week. Dramatis Personae of She Kills Monsters: Agnes Evans – Older sister to Tilly Evans, teacher at her former high school, leads a boring, vaguely satisfying life, wants to get to know the sister she lost Tilly Evans – young, unconventional, spirited, obsessed with fantasy as Tillius the Paladin – socially awkward dungeon master who helps Agnes play through Tilly’s module Lilith – Demon princess, girlfriend of Tilly, likes to fight, has a taste for human flesh Kaliope – dark elf ranger, friend and fellow adventurer of and Lilith Orcus – Demon King, lazy and reluctant to fight – Agnes’ boyfriend but not-yet fiancé, loves Agnes but dragging his feet on commitment Vera – Agnes’ friend and coworker, a counselor at the school but not particularly kind and nurturing Steve – hapless adventurer who dies. Repeatedly. Evil Tina and Evil Gabbi – two cheerleaders/succubi, antagonists Farrah – evil faerie Various and sundry monsters Please prepare a monologue for your audition. A few are provided below, but you are free to choose a monologue that you may already have prepared if you feel it shows your skills better. It does not have to be memorized.
AEHS Titan Poms – Audition Information Part I – Arm Motions & Sequences Arm Sequences (see youtube video) https://youtu.be/xBZ76Tou4ls?list=PLniDt1pZoV-W0ttenKDI5nbgPfz451MxB Part II – Turns & Jumps Pirouettes - Toe - C Jump -
Part III – Across the Floors & Choreography ( choreo videos will be posted during clinics) Grand Battement and Pirouettes - Chaines Turns, split leap, 2nd position leap – Combination – A medley of Pom/Jazz/Hip hop/Kickline(videos will be posted after the first clinic) Poms Audition Playlist (All videos above) https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLniDt1pZoV-W0ttenKDI5nbgPfz451MxB ****All links can be found at einsteinathletics.org under the poms team page!!!
Example 20-21 June 2002 2 L No 2 Non-core Conducted a full Initial Environmental Review of a garage. Name of individual, company, address, Tel, Fax, E-mail G Example 10-13 January 2002 4 L No 3 Core Due diligence and pre-acquisition audit of 2 old gas workings in . Work involved desk based study, on-site audit visit and follow-up report. Name of individual, company, address, Tel, Fax, E-mail DH Part 5: Overview of Appropriate Work Experience Office use Dates from and to Description of work (please provide a 2-3 sentence summary of the work undertaken) Job title held Industrial sector (see Appendix 3) Verification Source – name, company, address, tel, fax, e-mail Example November 2002 - October 2003 Three years work as operations manager. Duties entailed auditing other departments on-site as lead auditor and supervising the work on junior team members. Operations Manager - Quality Division Name of individual, company, tel, fax, e-mail
Table 5 Results of OLS Regression Analysis: Predicting Auditor Performance AUDITOR_PERFORMANCE = β0 + β1KNOWLEDGE_SEEKING_VARIABLES + β2OFFICE + β3RANK + β4GENDER + β5TENURE + ɛ (2) Model 1 Model 2 3 Variable Coefficient p-value Coefficient p-value Coefficient p-value KNOWLEDGE_SEEKING_TIES -0.797 0.004 BROKERAGE -0.319 0.059 STRONG_TIES 0.541 0.048 OFFICE 0.072 0.666 0.014 0.928 0.131 0.428 RANK 0.157 0.533 0.311 0.191 0.373 0.168 GENDER 0.008 0.958 0.051 0.734 0.067 0.669 TENURE 0.18 0.493 -0.004 0.988 0.055 0.832 N 45 45 45 Adj. R2 0.006 0.171 0.069 This table below reports the estimation of equation (2) using a sample obtained from 45 audit professionals from a Big 4 public accounting firm. The dependent variable in this model is the knowledge-seeking network. See appendix B for the definition of variables.
Figure 2 – Knowledge Networks of Auditors “A” and “B” All sociograms (visual representations of networks) were created NetDraw II (Borgatti, 2002). Figure 3 – Knowledge Networks of Auditors “A” and “B” Accounting for Tie Strength All sociograms (visual representations of networks) were created using NetDraw II (Borgatti, 2002). Figure 4 – Full Knowledge Network of Firm Auditors are shaped to denote gender and sized to indicate rank. All sociograms (visual representations of networks) were created using NetDraw II (Borgatti, 2002).
Civil Contractors Federation Contractor Management Systems Unit Tel (03) 9822 0900 Fax: (03) 9822 0022 Email: CONFORMITY ASSESMENT BODIES BSi (02) 8877 7125 (02) 8877 7197 DLCS Certification Services Jenny Papazi info@dlcsi.com.au (03) 9933 8800 Equal Assurance Leon Michailidis 0419 761 021 Global-Mark Pty Ltd Alexandra McQualter Alexandra.McQualter@global-mark.com.au (02) 9886 0222 DNV GL Business Assurance Angela Zhou (02) 9900 9550 QMS Certification Barry Fairman 1800 065 800 (02) 4926 2245 SGS Systems & Services Certification Mitchell tanya.mitchell@sgs.com (03) 9790 3441 Sustainable Amelia Critch Certification 1800 024 940
Auditory Considerations in the Learning Environment [This form was organized and adapted by Kathee Scoggin. It is based on information by Noel Matkin, University of Arizona, 1980.] Form: Student Location, Noise Level, and Comments Student Location Rate the environmental level 1-quiet to 5-very noisy Jot any comments about where the student may turn/take off hearing aid; seems to ask “what?” more often; seems distracted, uninterested, consistently irritable; complains or seems tired Gymnasium General Education Classroom Special Education Classroom Halls Cafeteria/Auditorium Playground/Outside Music/Band/Choir Room Restroom: Single or Double? Work experience place (on/off campus) Other: Adjacent Environmental Considerations: Identify items in areas adjacent to where the student is most often: External sounds
Key Words: “Medial Epicondyle” AND Fracture” All data required for extraction for this audit is then available via the PACS system at the time of radiograph review. The data extraction form is demonstrated below. (table 1) Radiology reports will be reviewed, and appropriate radiographs reviewed. The data extraction form will be completed 1). 1 - Data extraction form. Age (Years and Months) Sex Date of Injury (DD/MM/YYYY) Displacement of fracture (Displaced/ Undisplaced) Associated elbow dislocation (Y/N) Associated incarceration of fracture fragment (Y/N) Management (select one) Conservative Surgical Surgical Management (select one) One Screw Two Screws One K-wire Two Interval between injury and final radiograph on PACS (Years & Months) Evidence of union on last radiograph (Y/N) Results Table (to be shared nationally) 31st December ’13 – 31st December ’16 Medial epicondyle fracture treatment n (%)
BACKGROUND The Housing Authority of St. Louis County a quasi-governmental unit established under Chapter 99 of Missouri statutes. The agency administers the Housing Choice Voucher Program, has some public housing units and is a partner in several tax credit properties. The organization owns real estate as follows: Headquarters building Arbor Hill 70 units of public housing Fee Fee Manor 60 units of public housing Villa Lago 60 units of public housing Single family scattered sites 119 units of public housing Tiffany Townhomes – for sale, scheduled for demo disposition Tyrell Manor – for sale, scheduled for demo disposition Family Investment Center – up for sale Neighborhood stabilization scattered sites – 18 units West County properties scattered sites – 4 units Market rate units scattered sites – 5 units 41 vacant lots The organization is partner in 12 tax credit properties in various stages of compliance periods Primm Place – 128 units Heritage Senior – 64 units Stonecrest – 85 units Bentwood 1 – 82 units Bentwood 2 – 64 Bentwood 3 – 52 Stratford 1 – 66 units Stratford 2 – 48 units Stratford Manor – 52 units Laurel Park – 396 Windfall Trace 1 – 96 units Windfall Trace 2 - 37 units The organization manages three municipal housing authorities Olivette Housing Authority – 14 units Pagedale Housing Authority – 81 Hillsdale Housing Authority – 22 units
Standard 2.2.2 Assessment FA 0 1 0 0 0 2 Standard 2.2.3 Safe restraint use FA 0 3 0 0 0 6 Standard 2.2.4 Evaluation FA 0 2 0 0 0 3 Standard 2.2.5 Restraint monitoring and quality review FA 0 1 0 0 0 1 Standard 2.3.1 Safe seclusion use 0 0 0 0 0 5 Standard 2.3.2 Approved seclusion rooms 0 0 0 0 0 4 Restraint Minimisation and Safe Practice Standards (of 6): N/A: 0 CI:0 FA: 6 PA Neg: 0 PA Low: 0 PA Mod: 0 PA High: 0 PA Crit: 0 UA Neg: 0 UA Low: 0 UA Mod: 0 UA High: 0 UA Crit: 0 Criteria (of 21): CI:0 FA:9 PA:0 UA:0 NA: 0 Infection Prevention and Control Attainment CI FA PA UA NA of Standard 3.1 Infection control management FA 0 3 0 0 0 9 Standard 3.2 Implementing the infection control programme FA 0 1 0 0 0 4 Standard 3.3 Policies and procedures FA 0 1 0 0 0 3 Standard 3.4 Education FA 0 2 0 0 0 5 Standard 3.5 Surveillance FA 0 2 0 0 0 8 Standard 3.6 Antimicrobial usage 0 0 0 0 0 5 Infection Prevention and Control Standards (of 5): N/A: 0 CI:0 FA: 5 PA Neg: 0 PA Low: 0 PA Mod: 0 PA High: 0 PA Crit: 0 UA Neg: 0 UA Low: 0 UA Mod: 0 UA High: 0 UA Crit: 0
Auditor 1 XXXXXXX RGON, MBA, MN, Lead Auditor 12.00 6.00 26-Aug-13 to 27-Aug-13 Auditor 2 Auditor 3 Auditor 4 Auditor 5 Auditor 6 Clinical Expert Technical Expert Consumer Auditor Peer Review Auditor XXXXXXX RCompN, Health audit cert 2.00 Total Audit Hours on site 24.00 Total Audit Hours off site (system generated) 16.00 Total Audit Hours 40.00 Staff Records Reviewed 7 of 42 Client Records Reviewed (numeric) 8 of 52 Number of Client Records Reviewed using Tracer Methodology 2 of 8 Staff Interviewed 12 of 42 Management Interviewed (numeric) 1 of 3 Relatives Interviewed (numeric) 5 Consumers Interviewed 9 of 52 Number of Medication Records Reviewed 26 of 52 GP’s Interviewed (aged residential care and residential disability) (numeric) 1
Audit Evidence Attainment: FA Risk level for PA/UA: Finding Statement Corrective Action Required: Timeframe: Criterion 1.4.7.4 Alternative energy and utility sources are available in the event of the main supplies failing. Audit Evidence Attainment: FA Risk level for PA/UA: Finding Statement Corrective Action Required: Timeframe: Criterion 1.4.7.5 An appropriate 'call system' is available to summon assistance when required. Evidence Attainment: FA Risk level for PA/UA: Finding Statement Corrective Action Required: Timeframe: Criterion 1.4.7.6 The organisation identifies and implements appropriate security arrangements relevant to the consumer and the setting.
No short falls Standards applicable to this service fully attained Some shortfalls but no major deficiencies and required levels of performance seem achievable without extensive extra activity Some standards applicable to this service partially attained and of low risk A number of shortfalls that require specific action to address Some standards applicable to this service partially attained and of medium or high risk and/or unattained and of low risk Major shortfalls, significant action is needed to achieve the required levels of performance Some standards applicable to this service unattained and of moderate or high risk Consumer Rights Day of 26-Aug-13 Assessment Includes 13 standards that support an outcome where consumers receive safe services of an appropriate standard that comply with consumer rights legislation. Services are provided in a manner that is respectful of consumer rights, facilities, informed choice, minimises harm and acknowledges cultural and individual values and beliefs. Some standards applicable to this service partially attained and of low risk Organisational Management Day of Audit 26-Aug-13 Assessment Includes 9 standards that support an outcome where consumers receive services that comply with legislation and are managed in a safe, efficient and effective manner. Some standards applicable to this service partially attained and of low risk Continuum of Service Delivery Day of Audit 26-Aug-13 Assessment Includes 13 standards that support an outcome where consumers participate in and receive timely assessment, followed by services that are planned, coordinated, and delivered in a timely and appropriate manner, consistent with current legislation. Some standards applicable to this service partially attained and of medium or high risk and/or unattained and of low risk Safe and Appropriate Environment Day of 26-Aug-13 Assessment
Corrective Action Required: Timeframe: Criterion 1.3.12.5 The facilitation of safe self-administration of medicines by consumers where appropriate. Audit Evidence Attainment: FA Risk level for PA/UA: Finding Statement Corrective Action Required: Timeframe: Criterion 1.3.12.6 Medicine management information is recorded to a level of detail, and communicated to consumers at a frequency and detail to comply with legislation and guidelines. Audit Evidence Attainment: PA Risk level for PA/UA: Low Fourteen medication charts reviewed evidenced medication signing charts were correctly completed. Finding Statement (i)Gaps were evidenced in two of sixteen medication signing charts reviewed. No rationale for medication not signed for/given was documented in progress notes or on the medication signing sheets. Corrective Action Required: Ensure medications are signed for at time of administration. Timeframe: immediate-1 month STANDARD 1.3.13 Nutrition, Safe Food, And Fluid Management A consumer's individual food, fluids and nutritional needs are met where this service is a component of service delivery.
Criterion 2.2.4.2 Where an episode of restraint is ongoing the time intervals between evaluation processes should be determined by the nature and risk of the restraint being used and the needs of the consumers and/or family/whānau. Evidence Attainment: FA Risk level for PA/UA: Finding Statement Corrective Action Required: Timeframe: STANDARD 2.2.5 Restraint Monitoring and Quality Review Services demonstrate the monitoring and quality review of their use of restraint. ARC 5,4n ARHSS D5.4n, D16.6 Evaluation methods used: D SI STI MI CI MaI V CQ SQ STQ Ma L How is achievement of this standard met or not met? Attainment: FA The clinical leader and the restraint coordinator state that the use of any restraint is reviewed at the time of the three monthly individual resident care plan evaluation. The restraint approval meetings are held three monthly with the first meeting held in July 2013 (noting that the first restraint in the service was used in April 2013). The restraint coordinator reviews and updates the restraint register at least monthly and as any resident is identified as using restraint. Criterion 2.2.5.1 Services conduct comprehensive reviews regularly, of all restraint practice in order to determine: (a) The extent of restraint use and any trends; (b) The organisation's progress in reducing restraint; (c) Adverse outcomes; (d) Service provider compliance with policies and procedures; (e) Whether the approved restraint is necessary, safe, of an appropriate duration, and appropriate in light of consumer and service provider feedback, and current accepted practice; (f) If individual plans of care/support identified alternative techniques to restraint and demonstrate restraint evaluation;
Auditor 1 XXXXXXX RN, auditor certificate 9.00 5.00 16-Sept-13 Auditor 2 Auditor 3 Auditor 4 Auditor 5 Auditor 6 Clinical Expert Technical Expert Consumer Auditor Peer Review Auditor XXXXXXX 1.00 Total Audit Hours on site 18.00 Total Audit Hours off site (system generated) 12.00 Total Audit Hours 30.00 Staff Records Reviewed 8 of 50 Client Records Reviewed (numeric) 7 of 54 Number of Client Records Reviewed using Tracer Methodology 2 of 7 Staff Interviewed 9 of 50 Management Interviewed (numeric) 3 of 3 Relatives Interviewed (numeric) 3 Consumers Interviewed 8 of 54 Number of Medication Records Reviewed 14 of 54 GP’s Interviewed (aged residential care and residential disability) (numeric) 1
Corrective Action Requests (CAR) Report Provider Name: Springlands Senior Living Limited Type of Audit: Surveillance audit Date(s) of Audit Report: Start Date:16-Sep-13 End Date: 16-Sep-13 DAA: Health and Disability Auditing New Zealand Limited Lead Auditor: XXXXXXX Std Criteria Rating Evidence Timeframe 1.3.6 1.3.6.1 PA Moderate Finding: i) Five of twelve wound assessment and management plans do not document the type of wound, location and size of wound, ii) There is no short term care plan completed for a resident with weight loss. (iii) One resident with weight gain outside of the desired range as documented in the care plan has not had a review of the nutritional assessment. Action: i) Ensure wound assessment and management plans are fully completed and include the type of wound, location and size of wound currently being treated. ii) Ensure short term care plans are completed for any changes in resident condition/health. 3 months 1.3.12 1.3.12.1 PA Low Finding: The medication fridge in the rest home has not had regular weekly temperature checks completed from March to June 2013. Action: Ensure the medication fridge is checked on a regular basis 1 month 1.3.12 1.3.12.5 PA Moderate Finding: There are no medication charts available for the RN to check off medications when delivered for the self-medicating residents. Action: Ensure there are medication charts in place to allow reconciliation of medications to occur for those residents who are self-administering medications. 1
Corrective Action Required: Timeframe: Criterion 1.3.3.3 Each stage of service provision (assessment, planning, provision, evaluation, review, and exit) is provided within time frames that safely meet the needs of the consumer. Evidence Attainment: FA Risk level for PA/UA: Finding Statement Corrective Action Required: Timeframe: Criterion 1.3.3.4 The service is coordinated in a manner that promotes continuity in service delivery and promotes a team approach where appropriate. Audit Evidence Attainment: FA Risk level for PA/UA: Finding Statement Corrective Action Required: Timeframe: STANDARD 1.3.4 Assessment Consumers' needs, support requirements, and preferences are gathered and recorded in a timely manner. ARC D16.2; E4.2 ARHSS D16.2; D16.3d; D16.5g.ii