BIBLIOGRAPHY ON INTELLECTUAL HISTORY METHODOLOGIES Compiled by Mikkel Thorup (August 2013) Please feel free to circulate. Any corrections or suggestions to the list can be made to idemt@hum.au.dk. The principle for inclusion on the list is texts dealing with methodological aspects of intellectual history and/or intellectual historians. The principle of presentation is chronology. Journals Lychnos. An annual for history of ideas and science, 1936- Journal of the History of Ideas, 1940- Intellectual History Newsletter, 1979-2002 History of European 1980- Slagmark – tidsskrift for idéhistorie, 1983- ARR, 1989- Intellectual History Review, 1996- The European Legacy, 1996- Redescriptions, 1997- History of Intellectual Culture, 2001- Partial Answers. Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas, 2003- Modern Intellectual History, 2004- Contributions, 2005- Ideas in History, 2006- Zeitschrift für Ideengeschichte, 2007- Journal of Interdisciplinary History of 2012-
Michel Foucault, “History of Systems of Thought”, in Donald F. Bouchard (ed.), Michel Foucault. Language, Counter-Memory, Practice. Selected Essays and Interviews, Ithaca & New York: Cornell University Press 1977 Sande Cohen, “Structuralism and the Writing of Intellectual History”, History and Theory, vol. 17, nr. 2, 1978, s. 175-206 Hayden Tropics of Discourse. Essays in Cultural Criticism, Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press 1978 Leonard Krieger, “The Autonomy of Intellectual History”, in Georg G. Iggers & Harold T. Parker (eds.), International Handbook of Historical Studies, Westport, Ct.: Metheuen 1979 John Higham & Paul K. Conkin (eds.), New Directions in American Intellectual History, Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press 1979 Laurence Veysey, “Intellectual History and the New Social History” Gordon S. Wood, “Intellectual History and the Social Sciences” A. Hollinger, “Historians and the Discourse of Intellectuals” Rush Welter, On Studying the National Mind” Sacvan Bercovitch, “New England’s Errand Reappraised” F. May, “Intellectual History and Religious History” Dorothy Ross, “The Liberal Tradition Revisited and the Republican Tradition Addressed” Thomas L. Haskell, “Deterministic Implications of Intellectual History” Murray G. Murphey, “The Place of Beliefs in Modern Culture” David D. Hall, “The World of Print and Collective Mentality in New England” Thomas Bender, “The Cultures of Intellectual Life: The City and the Professions” Neil Harris, “Iconography and Intellectual History: the Half-Tone Effect” Warren I. Susman, “’Personality’ and the Making of Twentieth-Century Culture” John Dunn, “The Identity of the History of in Dunn, Political Obligation in its Historical Context. Essays in Political Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1980 Daniel J. Wilson, Arthur O. Lovejoy and the Quest for Intelligibility, N.C: Chapel Hill 1980 Century
David James Fisher, “Reading Freud’s Civilization and Its Discontents” Hayden White, “Method and Ideology in Intellectual History: The Case of Henry Adams” Dominick LaCapra, Rethinking Intellectual History. Texts, Contexts, Language, Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press 1983 Dominick LaCapra, “Intellectual History and Defining the Present as ‘Postmodern’”, in Ihab Hassan & Sally Hassan (eds.), Innovation/Renovation. New Perspectives on the Humanities, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press 1983 Stefano Collini, Donald Winch & John Burrow, “The Governing Science: Things Political and the Intellectual Historian”, in Collini, Winch & Burrow, That Noble Science of Politics. A Study in Nineteenth-Century Intellectual History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1983 Preston King (ed.), The History of Ideas. An Introduction to Method, London & Canberra: Croom Helm 1983 Preston King, “Introduction” Preston King, “Thinking Past a Problem” Michael Oakeshott, “The Activity of Being an Historian” Preston King, “Michael Oakeshott and Historical Particularism” R.G. Collingwood, “The Historical Logic of Question and Answer” Leo Strauss, “On Collingwood’s Philosophy of History” A.O. Lovejoy, “The of the History of Ideas” Maurice Mandelbaum, “On Lovejoy’s Historiography” Leo Strauss, “Political Philosophy and History” John G. Gunnell, “The Myth of the Tradition” Quentin Skinner, “Conventions and the Understanding of Speech Acts” Preston King, “The Theory of Context and the Case of Hobbes” John Patrick Diggins, “The Oyster and the Pearl: The Problem of Contextualism in Intellectual History”, History and Theory, vol. 23, no. 2, 1984, pp. 151-169 Iain Hampsher-Monk, “Political Languages in Time: The Work of J.G.A. Pocock”, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 14, 1984, pp. 159-174 Richard Rorty, “The Historiography of Philosophy: Four Genres”, in Rorty, J.B. Schneewind & Quentin Skinner, Philosophy in History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1984
Edward P. Mahoney, “Lovejoy and the Hierarchy of Journal of the History of Ideas, 1987, pp. 211-230 Francis Oakley, “Lovejoy’s Unexplored Option”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 1987, pp. John E. “Intellectual History after the Linguistic Turn: The Autonomy of Meaning and the Irreducibility of Experience”, American Historical Review, vol. 92, 1987, pp. 879-907 Hayden White, The Content of the Form. Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation, Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press 1987 Martin Jay, “Two Cheers for Paraphrase: The Confessions of a Synoptic Intellectual Historian”, in Jay, Fin de Siècle Socialism and other essays, New York & London: Routledge 1988 Anthony Pagden, “Rethinking the Linguistic Turn: Current Anxieties in Intellectual History”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 49, no. 3, 1988, pp. 519-529 Michel de Certeau, The Writing of History, New York: Columbia University Press 1988 Roger Chartier, Cultural History. Between Practices and Representations, Cambridge: Polity Press 1988 James Tully (ed.), Meaning and Context. Quentin Skinner and his Critics, Cambridge: Polity 1988 Tully, “The Pen is a Mighty Sword: Quentin Skinner’s Analysis of Politics” Quentin Skinner, “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas” Quentin Skinner, “Motives, Intentions and the Interpretation of Texts” Quentin Skinner, “’Social Meaning’ and the Explanation of Social Action” Quentin Skinner, “Some Problems in the Analysis of Political Thought and Action” Quentin Skinner, “Language and Social Change” Martin Hollis, “Say It with Flowers” Keith Graham, “How do Illocutionary Descriptions Explain?” Joseph V. Femia, “An Historicist Critique of ‘Revisionist’ Methods for Studying” Kenneth Minogue, “Method in Intellectual History: Quentin Skinner’s Foundations” Nathan Tarcov, “Quentin Skinner’s Method and Machiavelli’s Prince” John Keane, “More Theses on the Philosophy of History”
Terence Ball, “Must Political Theory Be Historical?”, Contributions, vol. 2, no. 1, 2006, pp. Bo Stråth, “Ideology and History”, Journal of Political Ideologies, vol. 11, no. 1, 2006, pp. Rudolf Valkhoff, ”Some Similarities between Begriffsgeschichte and the History of Discourse”, Contributions, vol. 2, no. 1, 2006, pp. 83-98 Javier Fernández Sebastián & Juan Francisco Fuentes, “Conceptual History, Memory and Identity: An Interview with Reinhart Koselleck”, Contributions, vol. 2, no. 1, 2006, pp. 99-127 Robert Burns (red.), Historiography. Critical Concepts in Historical Studies, vol. 3: Ideas, London & New York: Routledge 2006 Stefano Collini et. al., “What is Intellectual History?” Maurice Mandelbaum, “The History of Ideas, Intellectual History, and the History of Philosophy” Ben Rogers, “Review Article: Philosophy for Historians: The Methodological Writings of Quentin Skinner” Melvin Richter, “Begriffsgeschichte and the History of Ideas” Harlan, “Intellectual History and the Return of Literature” Appleby, “One Good Turn Deserves Another: Moving Beyond the Linguistic: A Response to David Harlan” Fritz Ringer, “The Intellectual Field, Intellectual History, and the Sociology of Knowledge” Robert M. Burns, “Language, Tradition, and the Self in the Generation of Meaning” Donald R. Kelley, Frontiers of History. Historical Inquiry in the Twentieth Century, New Haven & London: Yale University Press 2006 Emma Rotschild, “Arc of Ideas. International History and Intellectual History”, in Gunilla Budde, Sebastian Conrad & Oliver Janz (eds.), Transnationale Geschichte. Themen, Tendenzen und Theorien, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2006 J.G.A. Pocock, Gordon Schochet & Lois G. Schwoerer, “The History of British Political Thought: A Field and its Futures”, in David Armitage (ed.), British Political Thought in History, Literature and Theory, 1500-1800, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006
Quentin Skinner, “On the Liberty of the Ancients and the Moderns: A to My Critics” Forum on the Present and Future of American Intellectual History, Modern Intellectual History, vol. 9, no. 1, 2012, pp. 149-248 Thomas Bender: “Forum: the Present and Future of American Intellectual History, Introduction” Leslie Butler: “From the History of to Ideas in History” A. Hall: “Backwards to the Future: the Cultural Turn and the Wisdom of Intellectual History” A. Hollinger: “What is Our ‘Canon’? How American Intellectual Historians Debate the Core of their Field” James T. Kloppenberg: “Thinking Historically: A Manifesto of Pragmatic Hermeneutics” Joan Shelley Rubin: “Nixon’s Grin and other Keys to the Future of Cultural and Intellectual History” Jeffrey Sklansky: “The Elusive Sovereign: New Intellectual and Social Histories of Capitalism” Jeffrey Edward Green, “On the Difference Between a Pupil and a Historian of Ideas”, Journal of the Philosophy of History, vol. 6, 2012, pp. 84-110 Margrit Pernau, “Whither Conceptual History? From National to Entangled Histories”, Contributions, vol. 7, no. 1, 2012, pp. 1-11 Myoung-Kyu Park, “Conceptual History in Korea: Its Developments and Prospects”, Contributions, vol. 7, no. 1, 2012, pp. 36-50 David Armitage, ”What’s the Big Idea? Intellectual History and the Longue Durée”, History of European Ideas, vol. 38, no. 4, 2012, pp. 493-507 Mikkel Thorup: ”Intellektuel historie”, Temp, no. 4, 2012, pp. 177-189 “Symposium: Assessing and Extending The of the History of Ideas”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 73, no. 4, 2012 Daniel I. O’Neill, “Revisiting the Middle Way: The Logic of the History of Ideas after More Than a Decade” Martyn P. Thompson, “The Logic of the History of Ideas: Mark Bevir and Michael Oakeshott”
Janaki Bakhle, “Putting Global Intellectual History in Its Place” Duncan Bell, “Making and Taking Worlds” Frederick Cooper, “How Global Do We Want Our Intellectual History to Be?” Sudipta Kaviraj, “Global Intellectual History: Meanings and Methods” David Armitage, “The international turn in intellectual history”, chap. 1 in Foundations of modern international thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2013 Allan Megill and Xupeng Zhang, “Questions on the history of ideas and its neighbours” Rethinking History, 2013, pp. 1-21 Brian Kjær Olesen, Jonas Gerlings, Kaarlo Havu, Daniel Knegt, Matti La Mela & Thomas Ø. Wittendorff, “Doing things with intellectual history: Interview with Martin van Gelderen”, Zeitenblicke, vol. 12, no. 1, 2013, www.zeitenblicke.de/2013/1/Gelderen Slagmark, no. 67, 2013: Ny idéhistorie Beck Lassen, “Afselvfølgeliggørelse – idéhistoriens raison d’etre” Roger Chartier, ”Historien – eller om at læse tiden” David Dunér, ”Den kognitiva vändningen” Mikkel Thorup, ”Taget ud af sammenhæng – om kontekst i idéhistorie” Mark Bevir, ”Kontekstualisme – fra modernistisk metode til post-analytisk historicisme?” David Armitage, ”Hvad er den store idé? – intellektuel historie og longue durée”