R&V comprised of a range of discrete small projects. R&V sought to strengthen GoI’s capacity in science, and increase the use of science products and tools to support evidence based disaster risk management policy and practice by: Building the capacity of Indonesian scientists to better understand the nature of natural hazards including the size, severity, recurrence and spatial footprint; Facilitating science partnerships across GoI; and between GoI and academic research institutions for more effective science collaboration; Providing high performance computing infrastructure and fundamental data to support sophisticated hazard modelling; Providing academic scholarships to support the development of Indonesia’s future leaders of science; Developing and disseminating tools for integrating science into contingency planning and risk assessment processes. As previously mentioned, R&V was a component of AIFDR. The goal of AIFDR was to “strengthen national and local capacity in disaster management in Indonesia, and promotion of a more disaster resilient region”. A follow up program to R&V called DMInnovation commenced in August 2015. This program has a small team of GA staff based in Jakarta that continue to work with science agencies in Indonesia and support provincial and district planning. The program aims to build on the success of AIFDR and will maintain and enhance the scientific technical assistance program delivered in partnership between Indonesian science agencies and GA. Purpose and objectives of this review The ToRs state the objectives of this review are: Assess the effectiveness and sustainability of GA’s science program by addressing a range of high-level evaluation questions. Provide lessons learnt and recommendations that will inform and shape future disaster management programs. In addition to the review, the review team will be responsible for developing a collection of case studies assessing the extent to which innovative Australian and Indonesian science is informing disaster management policy and practice in Indonesia. The collection of case studies will form a separate report. Focus and scope of the review The review will consider the R&V program since its inception in 2008 until its completion in August 2015. The focus will be on the macro level of the R&V program. It is concerned with program outcomes, lessons learnt, and an assessment of the ‘take up’ of the R&V science information by Indonesian DM decision makers. It will not focus on the micro level of
capacity barriers to use; lessons learnt. R&V initiated training and capacity building programs have been effective? Have they targeted the correct individuals/groups and to what extent have participants adopted new practices, and are these likely to be sustained? Document review; semi-structure interviews in country; follow phone interviews after component of review. Demand for training and capacity building; selection of individuals and groups; which capacity building activities were successful, and why; success stories; alignment with what people needed & wanted; level of uptake; sustainability without further donor funding; lessons learnt To what extent did R&V successfully engage other disaster management programs delivered through AIFDR programs and combine local and expert knowledge to successfully deliver science to Indonesian DM decision makers? Document review; semi-structure interviews in country; follow up interviews after component of review. R&V connectivity with other AIFDR sub-programs; how sub-programs have connected; results of connectivity – benefits, draw backs, achievements; influence of local and expert knowledge; lessons learnt. To what extent are R&V programs initiated in Indonesia influencing the international DRM community Document review; semi-structured interviews in country; follow phone interviews after component of review. Evidence of replication of R&V products and tools outside of Indonesia. Annex 3: List of Documents Below is a list of documents supplied to the review team by DMInnovation. The latest copy of this file and the reading material is also available in Google Drive: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B_B91xklmjR5czBxZmRTVXdtUGc?ths=true Document Item:
English translation of the 2010 Team-9 National Earthquake Hazard Map that was funded by R&V AIFDR: 48_JAD15 137178 Indonesian Earthquake Hazard Map – English.pdf 4: Interviews and Interview focus In-country interviews: Interviewee(s) Interview focus 1. Jason Brown AIFDR Previous T&O Unit Leader, Lead for development of AIFDR2 design Chief of Party Tatts Indonesia, A USAID project through Mercy Corps-Cardno US Focus: Interconnectivity between subprograms and how T&O worked with R&V Value of science products and tools to CDSP Uptake of science products at provincial/district levels into the future Other donors working in DM space in Indonesia USAID/Mercy Corps-Cardno US project 2. Bpk. Danang Dwi Wahyujati BPBD Provincial - NTT Focus: Relationship with R&V science products used in risk assessment process in Nagekeo and how What gaps are in science information? Strategic of GoA support at subnational level 3. Bpk. Ir. Syafruddin Rauf Lecturer at Hassanudin University Bpk. Mukshan Hatta Lecturer at Hassanudin University Focus: Involvement in Makassar city contingency plan process Use of OSM Relationship with government science agencies View on continued demand for science information 4. Bpk. Sugeng Yanu BPBD Provincial East Java Bpk. Mirlianto Scout Boy, East Java Region Relationship with R&V – how initiated, supported etc Demand for science products and Effectiveness etc of AIFDR support (to Risk Assessment process and science information, e.g. OSM and InaSAFE) Uptake within BPBD Role of civil society groups (eg. scouts in exposure mapping) Links between AIFDR and AIPD programs
14. 1. Dr Hilman Natawidjaja Principal Scientist, Indonesian Institute of Science (LIPI) 2. Mudrick Rahmawah Duryono LIPI and GREAT PhD Student Background to GREAT initiative Process of earthquake hazard map development (strengths, weaknesses) Barriers and gaps in science development, recruitment Value of GREAT training for students 15. 1.Dr. Pak Hamzah Latief Professor in Oceanography at ITB Head of IABI Tsunami Working Group 2.Prof Ibu Harkunti Rahayu Study Program Planning and Policy Development at School of Architecture, Planning and Policy Development Focus: ITB relationship with GoI and role of science generally and role of R&V within that Gaps in science and data Application of tsunami inundation maps for informing community based planning activities. 16. DMInnovation Dr Robinson, Chief Scientist, GA Evolution of science program, program logic, expected outcomes; partnerships; monitoring and evaluation; views on achievements and lessons learnt Future directions 17. DR. Sri Hidayati , EQ Mitigation & Landslide Unit, BG Pak Amalfi Omang (Sent by R&V for ANU Masters) Pak Imam Catur Priambodo Pak Afif Haunan Focus: View on R&V support (strengths, weaknesses, lessons learnt, gaps) in capability development within BG View on GREAT initiative for BG staff Process of earthquake hazard map development (strengths, weaknesses) Relationships with other science agencies, BNPB and BPBDs. Data sharing
Ibu Tri Handayani Dr. Jaya Murjaya Head of Geophysical Seismology Engineering Potential & Time Signal Pak Pramono 23. Pak Trias Associate Professor Department of Geodetic Engineering Gadjah Mada University Focus: History of engagement View on open data, data management in GoI, particularly BNPB, generally and OSM in particular View on InaSAFE 24. 1. Pak Anjar Heriwaseso volcanologist/researcher Badan Geologi 2. Yohandi Kristiawan Focus: View on R&V support (strengths, weaknesses, lessons learnt, gaps) in supporting BG volcanic ash functions Access to GoA high performance computer 25. Jean- Bernard Carrasco – Minister Counsellor DFAT Focus: Review methodology, and emerging issues DFAT’s ODA policy settings and budget for Indonesia Relevance of science investment for GoA and GoI 26. Bpk. Ir. Dodi Ruswandi, MSCE BNPB Focus: Appetite for science in GoI DRR agenda Role of GoA in supporting BNPB Profile of BNPB – national and subnational GoI WoG collaboration for DRR Future strategic directions 27. 1. Dr. Ir. Agus Wibowo Msc Head of Data BNPB 2. Ibu Dian Oktiari ST, Msc Sub Section of Spatial Data Analysis, BNPB Focus: Connection of OSM and InaSAFE within BNPB Data functions Strengths, weaknesses of OSM and InaSAFE products Effectiveness of OSM and InaSAFE training Future directions for BNPB
2. Spatial Data: Pak Agung Indradjit View on OSM within GoI one map policy Relationship with GoI science agencies and support in developing data services 37. Faizal Thamrin UNOCHA Jakarta View on OSM and InaSAFE (achievements, lessons learnt, strengths, weaknesses, future) BNPB and BPBD uptake of data Views on PetaJakarta uptake by BNPB 38. Pak Iwan Gunawan Senior Disaster Risk Management Specialist World Bank Indonesia Focus: World Bank DRR work program in Indonesia Relevance of science products and tools GoI appetite and demand for science World Bank & R&V collaborative projects View on OSM and InaSAFE (achievements, lessons learnt, strengths, weaknesses, future) JakSAFE and InaSAFE connection/integration Data sharing within GoI Views on PetaJakarta data uptake by BNPB Jakarta 39. Widya Setiabudi Former AIFDR T&O Unit Program Manager Focus: Interconnectivity between subprograms and how T&O worked with R&V of R&V science products to CDSP (lessons learnt, strengths, weaknesses etc) Uptake of science products at provincial/district levels into the future 40. 1. Teuku Khairil Azmi Progam Manager of Indonesia Program Australian Red Cross 2. Husni Mubarok Senior IT Telecom Officer International Federation of Red cross and Red Crescent Societies 3.Rafiq Anshori Head of Disaster Preparedness Sub division, Palang Merah Indonesia Focus: ARC/PMI use of R&V science tools Effectiveness of InaSAFE training (strengths, weaknesses) Appropriateness of training targeting strategies Effectiveness of science products in own programs (OSM and InaSAFE) Demand for science products