zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
BLAENAU GWENT COUNTY BOROUGH COUNCIL Report To The Chair & Members of the Council Report Subject Report of the Independent Remuneration Panel for Wales 2018/19 Report Author Richard Bridge, Head of Exchequer Hayden, Head of Financial Services Report Date 12th March 2018 Directorate Resources Executive Portfolio Financial Management & Strategy Date of Meeting 26 2018 Date signed off by Monitoring Officer 10th April, 2018 Date signed off by Section 151 Officer 6th April, 2018 Date signed off by Chair 12th April, 2018 Key words Independent Remuneration Panel for Wales 2018/19 Report Information Summary 1. Purpose of Report 1.1 To inform Members of the proposals contained within the report of the Independent Remuneration Panel for Wales for 2018/19. 2. Scope of the Report 2.1 The report considers the main proposals included within the 2018/19 report (Appendix 1) of the Independent Remuneration
3. Contribution to the National Well-Being Goals – Detail attached as Appendix A 3.1 There are no direct issues relating to the National Well-Being Goals, as this document simply reports the work of the Licensing team in drafting and consulting on the Gambling Policy. However, issues around gambling addiction will be considered during the process. 4. Recommendation(s) / Endorsement by other groups, e.g. CMT/Committees/Other groups* 4.1 Endorsed by Environment & regeneration DMT. 5. Recommendation/s for Consideration* 5.1 That the Committee agrees that the draft Gambling Policy 2019/2022 should now be consulted on. Why this topic is a priority for the Council?* Report author to identify links to the main corporate strategies. Single Integrated Plan (SIP) Corporate Improvement Plan (CIP) Performance Management Improvement Framework (PMIF) Operating Model Transforming Blaenau (TBG Programme) Relevant legislation Other (please state) Y Reporting Pathway* Report author to identify proposed reporting pathway. (To identify dates where relevant) Directorate Management Team (DMT) Corporate Management Team (CMT) Audit Democratic Services Committee Scrutiny Executive Council Other (please state) General Licensing Committee *Denotes mandatory section Main Report 1. Background and Context* 1.1 Section 349 of the Gambling Act 2005 requires that (1)A licensing authority shall before each successive period of three years— (a) prepare a statement of the principles that they propose to apply in exercising their functions under this Act during that period, and (b) publish the statement. 1.2 The Gambling Commission “Guidance to licensing authorities”, which is statutory guidance under the Gambling Act 2005, explains that
That guidance goes on to that “It is a matter for licensing authorities to develop their own consultation practices, including the methods for consultation and who they consider it necessary to consult with, which might include consultation with relevant local groups, business and responsible authorities.” 2.5 It is proposed that the consultation process should follow a similar format to previous years, and this will include A formal consultation via the Local Authority website, giving a minimum of 12 weeks in which local residents, community groups, businesses and others can respond Consultation with other departments in respect of local risk assessments Continued consultation with the Gwent Licensing Forum A formal notification to the Chief of Police, as specifically required under the Gambling Act 2005 Written notification to Responsible Authorities under the Act Local gambling businesses, including their head office where appropriate Social media and other avenues will be used to publicise the consultation Members may wish to suggest other consultees or processes. 2.6 There are specified requirements within the consultation process, and key statutory dates for the publication and commencement of this policy. The time-frame is, therefore, as follows
APPENDIX A DEPARTMENT FOR BUSINESS INNOVATION AND SKILLS (BIS) ILLEGAL MONEY LENDING PROJECT PROTOCOL FOR ILLEGAL MONEY LENDING SECTION INVESTIGATIONS Interpretation For the purposes of this Protocol – “BCC” means Birmingham City Council “BPTS” means Borough of Poole Trading Standards “BoP” means Borough of Poole “IMLS” the Illegal Money Lending Section “Delegated Power” means the discharge of the function of the Enforcement of Part III of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 granted to BCC by PBC in pursuance of section 101 and 222 of the Local Government Act 1972, Regulation 7 of the Local Authorities (Arrangements for Discharge of Functions) (England) Regulations 2000, sections 13 to 19 of the Local Government Act 2000 and any other legislation enabling the discharge “Commencement Date” means the date the Delegated Power is granted “Term” means from the date of signing of this protocol to 31st March 2015 “Birmingham Trading Standards” means Regulatory Services of BCC “Contact Officer (PBCCO)” means the relevant person appointed by the Regulatory Services Manager of BoP to liaise with the Head of Illegal Money Lending Section on matters relating to and in connection with the Illegal Money Lending Project “Appropriate Contact Officer” means The Director of Regulatory Services, Head of Trading Standards or the Head of Illegal Lending of Birmingham Regulatory Services or any person nominated by the Council or authorised by them 1. Application This Protocol applies to the DBIS / HM Treasury funded ‘Illegal Money Lending Project’ and covers the following issues:- The conduct of investigations and associated working practices for the IMLS officers when conducting investigations or operating in The mechanisms whereby Borough of Poole is updated on the progress of the project and any significant issue relating thereto. The exchange of intelligence and information between the IMLS and BPTS The institution of legal proceedings.
In Area OOA 15 children 5 children Level 4+ in all areas 40% 60% Level 4+ maths 60% 80% Level 4+ reading 73% 100% Level 4+ GPS 53% 60% Level 4+ English overall 53% 60% For the 15 children who completed end of KS1 assessment in the summer of 2014 the outcomes were as follows. Level 2+ reading 2+ writing Level 2+ mathematics Middlesbrough LAC 2014 87% 87% 87% Middlesbrough LAC 2013 79% 64% 64% Middlesbrough LAC 2012 60% 67% 80% Middlesbrough LAC 2011 85% 77% 69% Middlesbrough LAC 2010 67% 33% 67% Middlesbrough all pupils 2014 80% 77% 84% Middlesbrough all pupils 2013 87% 83% 91% Middlesbrough all pupils 2012 83% 80% 87% Middlesbrough all pupils 2011 80% 77% 84% Middlesbrough all pupils 2010 80% 75% 85% LAC Nationally 2014 71% 61% 72% LAC Nationally 2013 69% 61% 71% LAC Nationally 2012 n/a n/a n/a LAC Nationally 2011 59% 52% 63% LAC Nationally 2010 58% 51% 62% Those educated in schools out of the LA were not at any disadvantage in terms of outcomes, however, the numbers are very small for this age group.
Current Virtual School Staff under Julie Bunn Head Teacher Virtual School/ Deputy Head of Vulnerable Learners Name Christina Baker Karen Gill Kipling Janet Hanley Viviane Moghal Louise Tennant Camseil Victoria Banks Job title Data Team LAC Teacher LAC Teacher LAC Teacher LAC Teacher LSA& mentor LAC Early Years LSA LAC Project Officer
Navy-Marine Trial Judiciary Eastern Judicial Circuit UNITED STATES v. NAME RANK Marine GENERAL/SPECIAL CIVILIAN DEFENSE COUNSEL NOTICE OF APPEARANCE Date: 1. Pursuant to Rule 5.1 of the Uniform Rules of Practice Before Navy-Marine Corps (Uniform Rules) and Rule 6.1 of the Eastern Judicial Circuit Rules of Practice (Circuit Rules), I, ATTORNEY’S FULL NAME, hereby provide notice to the Circuit Military Judge of my appearance on behalf of CLIENT’S RANK, FULL NAME. My office address, phone numbers, and e-mail address are: ADDRESS, PHONE NUMBER (office and fax) & E-MAIL ADDRESS. I am an active member in good standing licensed to practice in the following jurisdictions: LIST BAR ADMISSIONS. 2. I understand that practice in the Eastern Judicial Circuit requires me to be familiar with the Uniform and Circuit rules. Additionally, I am aware of the standards of professional conduct required of counsel practicing in Navy-Marine Corps courts-martial as contained in JAG Instruction 5803.1D. I certify that I am not now, nor have I ever been, de-certified or suspended from practice in Navy-Marine Corps courts-martial by the Judge Advocate General of the Navy. __________________________________ Counsel Name Attorney At Law
****************************************************************************** Certificate of Service I hereby attest that a copy of the foregoing notice of appearance was served on the court and opposing counsel personally and/or by facsimile on ____________________, 20xx. _________________________________ Counsel Name
1. Cognitive Behavioral Program (cognitive behavioral intervention program) Verify that all completed Pre and are submitted to the Assistant Commissioner of Rehabilitative Services/Designee on a monthly basis. Contract Section A.3.a.3. 2. Verify that the contractor delivered all the curriculum specific chapters for a successful completion. Contract Section A.3.b.2. 3. Verify that Cognitive Behavioral Program groups are not less than three (3) participants and do not exceed 15 participants. Contract Section A.3.b.4. 4. Verify that the Contractor submits weekly communication to the Supervising Probation/Parole Officer regarding offender’s attendance and adherence to program requirements. Contract Section A.3.c.1. 5. Verify that the Contractor submits a report to the State upon a participant’s successful completion/discharge. Including reason for discharge. Contract Section A.3.c.2. 6. Verify that the District Director has approved any discharges from the Cognitive Behavioral Program. Spectrum Contract Section A.3.c.4. 7. Verify the Contractor maintains a roster for each program facilitated for the State’s review. Contract Section A.3.c.5.
27. Verify that the Contractor requested and received written approval from the State for the following prior to the contract: The Contractor’s personnel who have overall responsibility for the contract between the State of Tennessee Department of Correction and Spectrum Health Systems, Inc. All service providers The Contractor shall consult the State for input and recommendations before hiring, dismissing or changing the location of an employee. Contract Section A.7.1. A.7.2. A.7.3. A7.e 28. Ensure that the Contractor verified all of its full time employees assigned to the contract between the State of Tennessee Department of Correction and Spectrum Health Systems, Inc. participate in the TDOC’s pre-service training program regarding State policies and procedures and security considerations as defined in TDOC policy. Contract Section A7.F. 29. All contract has received Title VI training. TDOC Policy 103.10 103.10.1
30. PROGRAM STAFF CREDENTIALING Verify that the file of each employee of the Contractor contains the following credentials: Employment history Copy of accredited college diploma/degree Evidence of reasonable inquiry into employment history with emphasis on delivery of evidence based program Signed Release of Information form or consent to contact previous employers Information regarding any criminal proceedings Contract Section A.8.A.1. A.8.A.2. A.8.A.3. A.8.A.4. A.8.A.5.
Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Eastern Judicial Circuit UNITED STATES v. NAME RANK Marine Corps/Navy CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH DISCOVERY DEADLINES Date: Pursuant to the trial milestones in the above-captioned court-martial, notice of completion of all required government discovery is hereby filed with the court pursuant to Eastern Judicial Circuit Rules 12.3. (if applicable) The following discovery issues remain, with accompanying explanations on actions being taken to complete said discovery: a. (BRIEF description of outstanding items and cause for the delay) _______________________ Signature of Trial Counsel (to be delivered to Defense Counsel on or before deadline ordered by Court) ******************************************************************************
Section 4 Compliance requirements for approved providers 22-24 Update; may change significantly if there is less reliance on Deeds / Payment Agreements in the future Section 5 Effective service management 25-28 This Section currently provides an overview of service management issues relevant to approved providers, as the relationship with ACATs, key personnel, advisory committees and case managers Update. Perhaps include in a new consolidated Part on Service Delivery (see part 4 below). Section 6 Administrative responsibilities of approved providers 29-34 This Section currently covers a range of approved provider responsibilities including accountability, insurance, quality reporting, OH&S, police checks, or brokerage of services. Update. Perhaps include in a new consolidated Part on Service Delivery (see part 4 below). Section 7 Subsidies and claims 35-44 Update information about subsidies and claiming processes. Information on new supplements (dementia and veterans) and existing supplements (viability, enteral feeding and oxygen) could be included in this Section. Section 8 Transfer of places 45-47 Combine with Section 2. Part 3 - Service Delivery to Care Recipients Section 9 Approval of care recipients 49-60 Update – include information explaining how the ACAT assessments within broadbanded levels will operate, and that assessment approvals will no longer lapse automatically. May be scope to shorten this section. Include links to other ACAT information and resources on the Department’s website. Section 10 Managing the delivery of services to care recipients 61-78 This section currently covers a number of issues, eg relating to the care planning process, case management, care recipient fees, care recipients with special needs, linkages with other programs (Veterans’ Home Care Program), security of tenure, quality of care and user rights, record keeping, privacy and complaints Much of this information will need to be included in the revised guidelines, but significant consolidation and reorganisation of information is required. Some of the information overlaps with other sections of the guidelines. Perhaps include a new (separate) section on fees, including care recipient contributions, noting that there
Certificate of Vision Impairment (MBr / DO) Promotion of tick Collation and use of data 12:25 – 12:35 Comfort break Future of committee – merger with Vision UK Dementia & Loss Committee (Attachment 5) (MBr / BG / RG) Common objectives and shared work streams Royal College of Nursing guidance on ‘The needs of people with learning disabilities (Attachment 6) (All) Update from members (All) Work plan 2017-18 (Attachment 7) (All) Any Other Business (BG) Date of next meeting: 13 June 2018, 11:00 – 13:30 at Pocklington Hub, 4th Floor, Entrance D, Tavistock House South, BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9LG (closest station Euston) of future meetings (all 11:00 – 13:30): 4 September 2018, Pocklington Hub, 4th Floor, Entrance D, Tavistock House South, BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9LG (closest station Euston) 12 December 2018, RNIB
Other stakeholders may be included, as required Methodology The project will explore current outline plan design gaps that may exist, focusing on three areas: Policy Process; and Product (Built Environment) Focusing on these three areas will help clarify which parts of the outline plan process may trigger design gaps, if gaps currently exist. The project team will collaborate with stakeholders through a series of workshops to identify and evaluate issues and opportunities for each focus area and determine in collaboration how best to address these issues. Three stakeholder-specific workshops were held 2018 January. The Appendix contains a “What We Heard” summary. Timelines The following timeline is proposed: January Stakeholder workshops March – April Project Chartering / Terms of Reference May Engage June Evaluation July Engage August Exploring Strategies September Engage October Refining Strategies November Engage Q1 2019 Report back to Council, as per Council direction Deliverables The following deliverables are anticipated through this process: What We Heard overview Summary of Process Results (as outlined in the Methodology) Analysis of Results Recommendations regarding the design gaps in outline plans, pursuant to the analysis Budget and Funding No additional budget is needed to conduct this work. Risks There are currently questions surrounding the review of outline plans for potential design input. If these are not addressed, all parties involved in the review of outline plans will continue to lack clarity regarding process and roles. This may have impact on application quality, timelines and policy.
8.1 (01/11/17) findings and to learn about different experiences Check if MSNAP covers the devolved nations. SOF 8.2 (01/11/17) Send CCQI information on PrOVIDe on behalf of the committee. SOF 8.3 (01/11/17) Contact David O’Sullivan, Chief Optometric Advisor to the Welsh Government to see if he can recommend someone to join the committee. MBr 9.1 (01/11/17) Dementia conference at Wellcome Collection/UCL, 2018 Confirm with Seb Crutch conference date, venue and no charge for delegates. PU 9.2 (01/11/17) Draft programme for conference by January 2018 and circulate to all to inform how they can contribute to the day. PU/ MBr/ SC 10.1 (01/11/17) Design Council Spark project update Ask Gemma Jolly about leading the project. PU 11.1 (01/11/17) Work plan Update work plan and circulate to all. TK 11.2 (01/11/17) Follow up with colleague on Cataract for Life. PA 11.3 (01/11/17) Inform MBr () of conferences including hearing loss sector to be put on the website. All 11.4 (01/11/17) Circulate postcard for dealing with people with dementia to all. MBr
11.5 (01/11/17) Send PA and SOF article for Journal of Dementia Care. TK 12.2.1 (01/11/17) Any business General Optical Council tender Re-circulate GOC tender and all to publicise to their contacts. MBr / All 12.2.2 (01/11/17) PA to send TK standards to be circulated to all. PA / TK 12.3.1 (01/11/17) Certificate of Visual Impairment Add CVI correlation of information for dementia to the work plan. TK
7.1 (06/12/17) Implications of NICE guidelines Circulate information on becoming member of NICE Advisory Committee. MBr 9.1 (06/12/17) Work plan All to send PD suggestions for items to be included on the work plan. All 10.1 (06/12/17) Any other business 10.1 Vision UK / Future of committee Comments to PD on the future of the committee and its membership. All 10.2(a) (06/12/17) 10.2 Certificate of Vision Impairment Circulate from CVI group. (See attachment item 10.3.) CB
Miller, 2016). This provided an opportunity to empirically examine the extent to which actual practice mapped onto the framework. The survey asked questions about the nature of emotional support/counselling being offered, including funding streams, service usage and type of interventions. The results found that there was some Tier One provision, but much less Tier Two provision. These survey findings provided important information about service provision in the UK and, in addition, provide an evidence base for future funding requests and the development of Tier One and Tier Two services. One of the key findings of the study was the need for quality standards benchmarking in the delivery of services. A small proportion of emotional support and counselling services for blind and partially sighted people in the UK is currently being delivered by unqualified staff. This is not good enough. Addressing the fourth unknown The fourth unknown needed to be addressed - what type of emotional support is most effective for blind and partially sighted people? In other words, what do people with sight loss really want to talk about, what type of talk helps and why? Systematic case study research – the development of therapeutic tasks In my individual programme of research, I chose systematic case study methodology in an attempt to answer the fourth unknown. Systematic case study methodology is not anecdotal. Multiple sources of data are collected and analysed by a team of
Table C: Governance Structure. Supporter / Stakeholder Advisory Governance Operational UK NEHS group UK NEHS Steering Group International Scientific Advisory Executive Board Project Management Group UK NEHS group members Chair: CEO VISION 2020 UK Vice-Chair: TBC Members: Independent Statistician Independent Epidemiologist Finance professional Host organisation (ARU) representative Project Partners PPI / Lay (x2 min) Stakeholder reps (X6) - sector and industry / funder-TBC Chair: TBC Epidemiologist(s) Ophthalmologist(s) Optometrist(s) Chair: Prof. Sir Michael Rawlins Vice-chair: CEO VISION 2020 UK Members: UK Govt. Rep. - DH Govt. Rep. WALES Govt. Rep. SCOTLAND Govt. Rep. NORTHERN IRELAND Lay person / PPI (x2 min) Sponsor / Host organisation rep. Chief Investigator: Rupert Bourne Co-Investigators: Richard Wormald, Tasnaee Braithwaite, Jugnoo Rahi, Mo Dirani Project office team: Project Manager Senior Project Coordinator Project Administrators (x3?) Finance manager (0.2 FTE?) Project Team: Screeners; Ophthalmologists/Optometrists UK NEHS ToR / Purpose Stakeholder / funder / supporter Receive and feedback on progress reports. Facilitate access to sector networks. Provide support and facilitation to project team. Identify and enable in-kind support and feed in to fundraising activities. Advice on technical scientific features of the project. Provide independent review of protocol, protocol related issues / changes, data analysis plan and delivery of analysis. Provide independent oversight. Review and advise on the development of the project. Manage the project. Collect data. Manage data. Analyse data. Produce interim and final reports. Produce papers. UK NEHS group UK NEHS Lay Advisory Group Expert Working Groups: 1. Data centre / IT 2. Imaging 3. E-Health 4. Equity group 5. Child Health 6. Care homes 7. Prisoners UK NEHS group members Suggest this is a remote / electronic that uses the applicants from the original call. Provide PPI perspective on
Mobile: Email: Australian Business Number: Note: if applying as a team or collaboration please provide contact details for team leader only. Signature: Upon signing this Form, the Artist/s acknowledge/s having read and agreed to the Commission terms as set out in the Artwork Brief. Name: Date: Selection Criteria Artist/ARTIST TEAm statement Provide a brief conceptual statement interpreting the Artwork Brief. Describe how you would approach the opportunity, and how the opportunity applies to your practice. (max. 200 words)
classified as unclear (Hopkins et al., 2009). The uncertainty of effects was based on 90% confidence limits for all variables. A custom spreadsheet was used to perform all of the calculations (.). Results There were trivial differences between BCAA and placebo groups for the total energy intake (2486 ± 412 kcal/day cf. 2667 ± 449 kcal/day; trivial, unlikely), carbohydrate (1157 ± 354 kcal/day cf. 1230 ± 300 kcal/day; trivial, unlikely), fat (980 ± 283 kcal/day cf. 1049 ± 275 kcal/day; trivial, unlikely) and protein energy intake (378 ± 79 kcal/day cf. 394 ± 101 kcal/day; trivial, unlikely). Changes in isometric strength (% baseline) are presented in Figure 1 (mean ± SD). There were large reductions in isometric strength between baseline and post-exercise for the BCAA group (1031 ± 273 N cf. 976 ± 238 N, respectively most likely ↓), whilst the placebo group showed very large changes (899 ± 248 N cf. 734 ± 186 N, respectively; most likely ↓). By post-testing, the reduction in strength remained very large for the placebo group (most likely ↓) and large for the BCAA group (most likely ↓), which were subsequently reduced to moderate, unclear changes among the placebo and BCAA conditions at 48-h. Both groups did not return to baseline strength levels during the study. Pairwise between-group tests revealed a greater reduction in isometric strength at 24-h in the placebo group compared to the BCAA group (moderate, likely ↓), indicating a delayed recovery of muscle function. *******Figure 1 near here*******
Parameters Inclusion Criteria Exclusion Criteria Participants Studies primarily focused upon therapeutic work with 11 to 25 year olds Studies primarily involved work with individuals below 11 or above 25 Intervention Studies in client-therapist engagement in real time via instant messaging or synchronous chat is discussed Studies reporting one-to-one engagement with clients Studies in which no web programme or computerised programme was used in conjunction with the therapy in which client-therapist engagement in via phone line, audio or video-chat is discussed reporting group based interventions in which a computerised or programme was used with or without minimal therapist contact Study Type Peer-reviewed, primary research studies. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies Theoretical papers, editorials, commentaries, book chapters, dissertations or thesis, and grey literature. Publication Status Peer reviewed empirical research papers published between 2000 and 2014. Unpublished studies as they may well be of lower methodological quality Country of Origin Studies conducted in any country are eligible. Language English language Not English language. 2: Key characteristics of the included studies Study reference number Authors (Date) Country of Original & Organisation Online Sample (n) Type of study (primary) Methodology 1 Hanley (2006) UK, No organisation 9 online counsellors Contextual factors Qualitative 2 King, Bambling, Reid & Thomas (2006) Australia, Kids HelpLine Total N=86 young clients Effectiveness Quantitative 3 King, Bambling, Gomurra, Smith, Reid & Wenger (2006) Australia, Kids HelpLine N (online sample) = 39 young clients Contextual Factors Qualitative
4 Bambling, King, Reid & Wegner (2008) Australia, Kids HelpLine N= 26 online counsellors Counselling process Qualitative 5 Williams, Bambling, King, & Abbott (2009) Australia, Kids HelpLine N= 85 young clients Counselling Process Mixed Methods 6 Hanley (2009) UK, Kooth N= 95 young clients (Initial Outcome Sample, 95; Alliance sample, 46; Interview sample, 7) Counselling Process Mixed Methods 7 Chardon, Bagraith & King (2011) Australia, Kids HelpLine The 85 online counselling transcripts from King et al.’s (2006b) study Counselling Process Quantitative 8 Fukkink (2011) Netherlands, in Trust Project A random sample of 78 chat conversations with young clients that were held by 10 young peer counsellors Counselling Process Qualitative 9 Callahan & Inckle (2012) Ireland, Various services N= 9 online counsellors 5 young people in pre-arranged consultation group. Quantitative sample (N=57,866: online sample = 1,017) Counselling Process Methods 10 Hanley (2012) UK, Kooth N= 15 clients Counselling process Qualitative 11 Wentz, Nyden & Krevers (2012) Sweden, The Neuropsychiatry Clinic N= 10 clients Effectiveness Quantitative 12 Sefi & Hanley (2012) UK, Kooth N= 143 young clients Effectiveness Mixed Methods 13 Dowling & Rickwood (2014) Australia, online mental health support service N= 19 online counsellors Counselling process Qualitative
$ $ sq.ft. of Units (SUM (b x c)) Annualized Total Rental Income (SUM (e)) $ Managers’ Units Restricted Market Rate (a) # of Bedrooms (b) Unit sq.ft. (c) # of Units (d) Proposed Monthly Mgr- Paid Rent per Unit (e) Total Proposed Monthly Rent (c x d) $ $ $ $ $ $ sq.ft. of Mgr Units (SUM (b x c)) Annualized Total Rental Income (SUM (e)) $ 2. (a) Total No. of Units (excluding Mgr. Units) (b) Total No. of Restricted Units (c) Percent of Restricted Units (b a) (d) No. of Units at or below 50% AMI (e) Percent of Units at or below 50% AMI (d a) (f) No. of above 50% to 60% AMI (g) Percent of Units 50% to 60% AMI (f a) (h) No. of Restricted Rental Units with 3 or more Bdrms. (i) Percent of Restricted Rental Units with 3 or more Bdrms. (h b) % % % %
Form 1 [r. 4, 7] Animal Welfare Act 2002 Application for licence to use/supply animals for scientific purposes Person or Scientific Establishment (Applicant) Name: Address: Type of licence that is required Licence to use animals for scientific purposes Issue Renewal Licence to supply animals for scientific purposes Issue Renewal If applying for a USE licence, indicate the PRIMARY activity for which the animals are to be used Medical research Agricultural research Teaching (please specify) Academic research Field Trials Veterinary research (including wildlife) where animals are to be located under this licence Animal ethics committee (for USE licence only) The applicant has — established its own committee; or arranged for the committee of to act as its committee.
<Attachment 1> JOB DESCRIPTION of World Friends Korea(WFK)-Advisor ※ Please complete the form and mark on the box. General Information ■ Job Title The job title must accurately describe the job to be performed by the expert ■ Location, Country (eg :. Vientiane, Laos) ■ Duration □ 6 months □ 12 months ■ Expected Starting Date □ July 2017 ~ □ August 2017 ~ □ No preference Detailed information of the requesting organization ■ Organization Name : ex) Ministry of Commerce(MIC) Requesting Department : ex) Department of E-Commerce Office Name : ■ Type of Organization 1) □ Government □ Public organization □ Public corporation □ Others : ■ Working Day/Hours : ■ Contact Person : (Please nominate someone from your organization who will be responsible for the work of Korean experts) ■ Tel/Fax/E-mail : ■ Office Location : ■ Major activities of the Organization(Please list at least three) - ■ Major activities of the department where WFK - Advisor will be dispatched -
Market Performance Committee Meeting 11 28th February 2018 | 10:30 – 15:30 MOSL | 4th floor, 16-18 Monument Street, London, EC3R 8AJ Agenda Item No. Time Agenda Item Purpose Reference Presenter 1. 10:30 – 10:35 Welcome and Introductions For Information Verbal Chair 2. 10:35 – 10:50 Minutes & Outstanding Actions For Decision Verbal 3. 10:50 – 11.00 Report from Panel For Information Verbal Chair 4. 11.00 – 11.50 Market Performance Operating Plan Update For Discussion MPC11_01 Mike Robertson 5. 11:50 – 12:10 Summary of Committees and Working Groups For Information MPC11_01 Katie Trewhella 6. 12:10 – 13:00 Review of MPC of Reference For Discussion MPC11_02 All 13:00 – 13:30 Lunch 7. 13:30 – 13:50 MPS Reports Update For Information Verbal Katie 8. 13:50 – 14.35 OPS Assurance and Potential Charging For Discussion Verbal Jesse Wright 9. 14:35 – 15:15 MPC Forward Agenda Planning For Discussion Verbal All 10. 15.15 – 15.20 Agreement of Next Steps For Decision Verbal Chair 11. 15:20 – 15:30 Any Other Business (AOB) For Discussion Verbal Chair
Work with community services to establish a new community grant category to support activities related to Positive Ageing. Community and Recreational Development Evidence of Positive Ageing Category in the community grants for 2019. June 2019 Explore the option of Access and Inclusion champion model across Council. All MSC service units Evidence of active Access and Inclusion champions from each unit. Dec 2018 To awareness of the importance of sexual health for older people Increase awareness of service providers in regards to sexual health of older people. Municipal Public Health plan Work with GP’s to increase awareness of sexual health in older people Dec 2018 Improve food security and access to healthy foods in areas of disadvantage within Moorabool Promotion of Active Ageing and Community Access bus service to food outlets. Municipal Public health plan. No. of clients accessing the bus service. June 2020. 3.4 Housing Goal: To improve access to resources that support community wellbeing with a focus on housing Outcome: What we hope to achieve Objective: What is the broad target we are aiming for Actions: What we will do to achieve our outcome Responsibility: Who will be responsible Indicative measures: How we will measure progress Timeline: When will the action be completed Improve access to housing that is affordable, well designed and close to services and facilities. To ensure people who are risk of homelessness have referral options Develop a local directory of information about housing options and promote Housing for the Aged Action group pathways. AACA Manager Local directory developed and promoted on website. Engage in a local Homelessness Network to support people at risk. AACA Manager Active participation in the Homelessness Network with the view to incorporating strategies from the network to Moorabool Shire. To support access for older people to basic home modifications to maintain or increase their independence through the Commonwealth Home Support Program (CHSP). Continue to promote the CHSP funded home modifications program so people can continue to live independently in their homes. AACA unit and OT Meet Home Modification targets as per funding guidelines.
Before mailing originals, e-mail scanned copies of signed contract application and CO endorsement to Ms. Melinda Weeden at . Applications must be received at PERS-43 by 31 August 2016. Applications for this ADHRB program will not be accepted after 31 August 2016. d. ADHRB contracts will be considered binding as of the date of PERS-43 approval.
Quarterly Programmatic Reporting Requirements for Project Reinvest Financial Capability Organization Name Reporting Period Number of Tier 1A and Tier 1B Counseling/Coaching units completed through end of reporting period # of Tier 1A Counseling/Coaching Units # of Tier 1B Counseling/Coaching Units Total Number of Units of Counseling/Coaching units provided (by Mode of counseling) # Tier 1A Counseling/Coaching Units Delivered # Tier 1B Counseling/Coaching Units Delivered Face-to-face Telephone Internet Video Conference TOTAL* *These totals should match totals from question #3 If other, please explain mode of counseling. Counselor/coach count- by language spoken Language Number of counselors/coaches who delivered services in this language English Spanish Other (Please Specify) Other (Please Specify) Other (Please Specify) Total 5A. If your organization has no counselors/coaches delivering services in any language than English, please briefly describe systems or strategies in place to meet the needs of limited English proficiency clients that may seek assistance. Number of Staff who have received training/professional development during the reporting period
Complete the information in the “Recipient” column. California Energy Commission Recipient Commission Agreement Manager: (TBD) California Energy Commission 1516 Street, MS-51 Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone: (916) 327-XXXX Fax: (916) 327-XXXX e-mail: Project Manager: (Name) (Recipient’s Name) Address Phone: (XXX) XXX -XXXX Fax: (XXX) XXX -XXXX e-mail: Commission Agreement Officer: (TBD) California Energy Commission 1516 Ninth Street, MS-1 Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone: (916) 654-XXXX Fax: (916) 654-XXXX e-mail: Administrator: (Name) (Recipient’s Name) Address Phone: (XXX) XXX -XXXX Fax: (XXX) XXX -XXXX e-mail: Accounting Officer: (TBD) California Energy Commission 1516 Ninth Street, MS-2 Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone: (916) 654-XXXX Fax: (916) 654-XXXX e-mail: Accounting Officer: (Name) (Recipient’s Name) Address Phone: (XXX) XXX -XXXX Fax: (XXX) XXX -XXXX e-mail: Legal Notices: Tatyana Yakshina Grants Manager 1516 9th Street, MS-1 Sacramento, CA Phone: (916) 654-4204 Fax: (916) 654-4076 e-mail: Legal Notices: (Name) Address Phone: (XXX) XXX -XXXX Fax: (XXX) XXX -XXXX e-mail:
Tasmania’s Cancer Framework Three key elements make up Tasmania's Cancer Framework: a service system designed in accordance with best evidence, a contemporary model of care and strong governance systems. The following principles which were developed in consultation with a broad range of stakeholders, take into consideration the National Service Improvement Framework for Cancer and represent guiding values and beliefs that underpin the Framework. Principle 1 – A multidisciplinary approach Principle 2 – Integrated, quality care that meets the needs of consumers Principle 3 – Access, equity and diversity Principle 4 – A skilled and supported workforce Principle 5 – Research and innovation Principle 6 – Data and information to support decision-making Principle 7 – An engaged and educated community Principle 8 – A planned, flexible and adaptable system Principle 9 – Accountable and responsible stewardship and use of resources Tasmania’s Strategic Cancer Plan Vision To reduce the impact of cancer on Tasmanians at risk of or affected by cancer Mission To provide high quality cancer services across the continuum of care, from prevention through to treatment, survivorship and palliative care for all Tasmanians Objectives Improving cancer prevention Detecting cancers earlier Creating an integrated and sustainable system Providing a contemporary model of care Ensuring a well-governed system The Cancer Framework defines the desired elements of Tasmania’s system for cancer prevention and care. The analysis and consultation for this plan resulted in agreement on a vision, mission, objectives, strategies and actions to be completed over the three years of the plan to develop Tasmania’s cancer services so that they incorporate all of the framework elements and support service delivery in accordance with the framework principles. The plan is due for review in 2013 and this will inform development of the 2013-16 cancer plan.
“Judicial Branch Personnel” means members, justices, judges, judicial officers, subordinate judicial officers, employees, and agents of a Judicial Branch Entity. “Notice” a written communication from one party to another that is (a) delivered in person, (b) sent by registered or certified mail, or (c) sent by overnight air courier, in each case properly posted and fully prepaid to the appropriate address and recipient set forth in Appendix C. “Option Term” means a period, if any, through which this Agreement may be or has been extended by the JBE. “PCC” refers to the California Public Contract Code. “Services” is defined in Appendix A. “Stop Work Order” is defined in Appendix B. “Term” comprises the Initial Term and any Option Terms. “Work” is defined in Appendix A.
Improve offender accountability for by arresting/convicting ____% of offenders who committed violations. Number of offenders who committed violations Number of arrests/convictions for violations Reduce recidivism (re-arrest) rate of offenders to ____% through improved monitoring and treatment services. Number of offenders under supervision Number of offenders who received treatment services Number of offenders rearrested
Deliverables: Available funds to cover consultant and contractor billings while awaiting reimbursement from DWR Task 5 Develop Project Monitoring Plan Lay out implementation steps to monitor project’s goals, targets, performance indicators and measurement tools and methods. Deliverables: Project Monitoring Plan Task 6 Environmental Documentation Already completed Deliverables: CEQA Notice of Exemption Complete and filed at Tulare County Clerk and State Clearinghouse, SCH Number 2014058261 (see attached). Task 7 Software and Meter Reader Subtask 7.1 Billing Software The District will purchase Software and install on existing and/or updated computer system to meet the project goals. Subtask 7.2 Meter Reader District will purchase radio read meter reader and accessories. Deliverables: Purchase and integration of data logger and billing software. Task 8 Design The District’s engineer will design the project and prepare bid documents. Deliverables: Completion of project plans and specifications at the 90 percent and final level. Task 9 Permitting The proposed project will require two types of permits from the Tulare County Resource Management Agency. An encroachment permit will be required for work in the public rights-of-way which includes the installation of water meters. In addition, a plumbing permit(s) will be required for the installation of house service connections on private property. Both permits are issued to contractors when construction is about to commence.
6. Calendars, personal organizers, and other dated office items All office-related calendars and organizers 7. Cases and portfolios Carrying cases, presentation portfolios, leather and vinyl portfolios, twin-pocket portfolios, and zipper portfolios 8. Computer accessories Mouse pads, wrist rests, antiglare screens, desktop cleaning supplies, media storage, keyboard drawers (excludes electronic information technology (EIT) 9. Computer media Diskettes, CDs, DVDs, data tape, USB devices 10. Drawing and graphic arts supplies Adhesives and glue, erasers, rulers and measures 11. Mailing and shipping supplies Envelopes, shipping sacks, packaging tape 12. Miscellaneous office supplies Fastening items including staplers, paper clips, binder clips, etc.; adhesive tape, label makers, rubber stamps, ink, push pins, paper- hole punchers 13. Office furnishings Clocks, stools, picture frames, wastebaskets 14. Shredders Office-type and high-security shredders 15. Visual communications and meeting aids Blackboards, whiteboards, easels, videotapes, audiotapes, dictation supplies 16. Writing instruments Pens, pencils, highlighters, markers Delivery: Desktop Delivery: Desktop delivery is direct delivery of packages to a customer's desk.
Appendix 1: Permanent and Temporary Budget Virement Requests – Quarter One 2017/18 Virement Request Economic Development and Infrastructure £000s Culture and Communities £000s Environment and Commercial Services £000s Public Health and Public Protection £000s Education £000s Children’s Care £000s Prevention and Partnerships £000s Adult Social Care and Health Integration £000s Finance, Governance and Support £000s General Fund £000s Permanent Change Fund transfer – posts agreed to be made permanent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 340 -340 Capital Financing Solar Energy and streetlight 2016/ 17 savings -191 0 -48 0 0 0 0 0 0 239 Correction of 2016/17 Public Health Virement 0 0 0 1,509 0 0 0 0 0 -1,509 Temporary Additional funding re. Improving Council Tax Collection as per Executive Report 11/7/17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 160 -160 Total Virement: -191 0 -48 1,509 0 0 0 0 500 -1,770 Total: 0
Appendix 4: 2017/18 Budget and performance monitoring – Consolidated action plan Directorate Action Who When Economic Development and Infrastructure Finalise Housing Growth Strategy programme plan. Director of ED&I End Q2 2017/18 Review potential inflationary pressure on electricity and establish position. Head of Transport and Infrastructure / Financial Planning and Support End Q2 2017/18 Identify further mitigating savings during 207/18 to prevent an overspend at Director of Economic Development and Infrastructure End Q4 2017/18 Culture and Communities Review anti-social behaviour target to ensure that this remains SMART. Head of Stronger Communities End Q2 2017/18 Three year approach to events programming to be presented to Executive in November Director of Culture and Communities End Q3 2017/18 Environment and Commercial Services Review options to improve recycling rate at report to Executive. Director of ECS End Q3 2017/18 Review Passenger Transport Service with view to mitigating budgetary pressure. End Q2 2017/18 Identify further savings to mitigate budget pressures within the Directorate. Director of ECS / Finance Planning and Support End Q2 2017/18 Review passenger transport service provision Director of ECS End Q2 2017/18 Public Health and Public Protection Analyse use of Public Health Grant across Directorates to identify future savings. Director of PH&PP / Financial Planning and Support End Q2 2017/18 Children’s Care Identify issues relating to timeliness of LAC processes and implement improvement plan. Director of Children’s Care End Q2 2017/18 Review value of implementation of Controcc as part of Believe in Families programme. End Q2 2017/18 Prevention and Partnerships Review reoffending performance and develop / implement improvement plan. Director of Prevention and Partnerships End Q2 2017/18 Finance, Governance and Support Identify way forward in relation to continuing pressures on Services budget. Head of Legal and Democratic Services / Financial Planning and Support End Q2 2017/18 Vire income budget from Valuation and Estates to Environment and Commercial Services. Financial Planning and Support End Q2 2017/18 Report to be brought forward on Services costs Head of Legal and Democratic Services End Q2 2017/18
ATTACHMENT 4: ARPA-E REPORTING CHECKLIST AND INSTRUCTIONS 1. Identification Number: 2. Program/Project Title: 3. Recipient: 4. Reporting Requirements (see attached “ARPA-E Reporting Instructions”): I. PROJECT MANAGEMENT REPORTING (DURING AWARD) A. Research Performance Progress Reports B. Financial Reports C. Scientific/Technical Conference Papers/Proceedings D. Intellectual Property Reporting E. Intellectual Property Management Plan F. Subject Invention Utilization Reporting G. Lobbying Activities Reporting H. Special Status Reports I. Annual Indirect Cost Proposals J. Annual Audit of For-Profit Recipients K. Annual Property Inventories L. Subaward/Subcontract Reports M. Annual Interim Reports on Subject Invention Disclosures II. CLOSEOUT REPORTING (UPON CLOSEOUT OF AWARD) A. Final Scientific/Technical Report B. Invention and Patent Report C. Final Property Report D. Software Deliverable Submission III. POST-AWARD REPORTING (FOLLOWING CLOSEOUT OF AWARD) A. Subject Invention Utilization Reporting (see Section I.F above) Frequency No. of Copies Addressees QR QR Y Y X A Y Y FY FY A Y A F F F F A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 See block 5 for instructions See block 5 for instructions See block 5 for instructions See block 5 for instructions See block 5 for instructions See block 5 for instructions See block 5 for instructions See block 5 for instructions See block 5 for instructions See 5 for instructions See 5 for instructions See block 5 for instructions See 5 for instructions FREQUENCY CODES AND DUE DATES: A – Annually; within 90 calendar days the end of the annual reporting period. F – Final; within 90 calendar days after closeout of the award. FY – Annually; within 180 calendar days after the close of the fiscal year. QR – Quarterly; within 15 calendar days after end of the quarterly reporting period. X – Within six (6) weeks of the effective date of ARPA-E Award. Y – Within five (5) calendar days after the event or as specified.
Instructions on How to Calculate the Sales Price for Enhanced SINs 75 220 and 75 280 only: The final Schedule contract award price is calculated as follows: Negotiated price divided by (1 minus the CAF rate) If the CAF rate is 2%, then 1 - 2.00% = 1 - 0.0200 = 0.9800. The Schedule contract price is calculated as the negotiated price divided by 0.9800. For example, if the negotiated price is $100,000, the proper way to calculate the Schedule contract award price (assuming an CAF rate of 2.00%) is: ($100,000 / 0.9800) = $102,040.82 TDR is mandatory for SINs 75 220 and 75 280: (a) Definition: Transactional data encompasses the historical details of the products or services delivered by the Contractor during the performance of task or delivery orders issued against this contract. (b) Reporting of Transactional Data: The Contractor must report all transactional data this contract as follows: The Contractor must electronically report transactional data by utilizing the automated reporting system at an Internet website designated by the General Services Administration (GSA) or by uploading the data according to GSA instructions. GSA will post registration instructions and reporting procedures on the Vendor Support Center website, https://vsc.gsa.gov. The reporting system website address, as well as registration instructions and reporting procedures, will be provided at the time of award or inclusion of this clause in the contract. The Contractor must provide, at no additional cost to the Government, the following transactional data elements, as applicable: Contract Number of Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Number. Delivery/Task Number/Procurement Instrument Identifier (PIID). Non-Federal Entity. Description of Deliverable Manufacturer Name. Manufacturer Part Number. Unit Measure (each, hour, case, lot) Quantity of Item Sold. Universal Product Code. Paid per Unit. Total Price