No Project Outcome Indicator Level Timescale Progress as at 31.05.17 1 Adults with 3+ complex needs will experience improved physical and mental health, relationships, life-skills, housing, employability and reduced through access to and services Adults with multiple needs report they; are better able to manage and maintain tenancy and accommodation have reduced their offending behaviour are better able to take responsibility and have improved motivation have improved their self-care and living skills are better able to manage money have improved relationships with their families and social networks have reduced their misuse of drugs and/or alcohol have improved physical health have improved emotional and mental health are engaged in meaningful activities Beneficiary starts (as on MIS from Pre-navigation) 71 225 225 225 225 79 Total 1050 Beneficiaries report positive outcomes on completion of Second Homelessness Outcome Star after 6 months Navigator support 8 100 200 200 200 200 Navigators record improved Chaos Index Score after 12 months Navigator support 71 225 225 225 225 79 Total 1050 Beneficiaries report increased scores in at least 6 areas of need at 2 year assessment point (or final if earlier) on Homelessness Outcome Star 15 105 225 225 225 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 2nd HOS Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Post programme continuation Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 130 200 223 553 Cumulative 8 75+ive 111 193+ive 325T 65 250+ve 378T 0 23 out of 47T 2 Services for People with multiple needs are informed by service users themselves and person- centred Service will benefit from the development of a co-produced portable care plan ‘passport’ reducing the 50 services and agencies sign up to the WY-FI Information Sharing Protocol and the ‘passport’ by the end of year 4 8 in pilot Locality Year 2 Not achieved Feasibility paper presented to and accepted by CPMB Apr 17. Actions
People with multiple and complex needs benefit from the Navigator practice of person-centred and multi-agency support which empowers sustainable engagement and outcomes. Evaluation of Navigator Practice/model over time. CRESR submit Baseline evaluation report Interim evaluation report Final evaluation report end By end of Year 2 By end of Year 3 By end of Year 5 Completed April 2016 Due 12 July from CRESR Multi agency working is embedded as ‘usual’ working practice when delivering services to individuals with multiple and complex needs Evaluation of the effectiveness of MARB from an agency perspective over time. CRESR submit Baseline evaluation report Interim evaluation report Final evaluation report end By end of Year 2 By end of Year 3 By end of Year 5 Completed December 2015 Consultative commissioning involves Beneficiaries and Experts in the design and procurement of services Beneficiaries and Experts by experience are involved in the design and procurement of services 2 2 2 2 2 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 2 2 Beneficiaries and Experts by Experience evaluate effectiveness of and Innovation Fund Pilots Year 3 report Year 4 report 1 x Bradford No Project Outcome Indicator Level Timescale Progress as at 31.05.17 4 The basic requirements of individuals with multiple and complex needs are addressed through systemic change Culture Change – Perceptions and operational practices relating to individuals with multiple and complex are improved Agency Practice Development Groups are delivered with a minimum of 8 attendees at each session. Sessions: 2 6 6 6 6 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 0 5* Principles of Co-Production and WY-FI learning are
7 Monitoring of Local and Innovation Fund funded services, reports completed as per Agreements Research and evaluation Team and Locality group 1 month into delivery, a project check in to check the project is up and running and the costs match delivery 6 months into delivery, a project report from the project to the WY-FI Hub that includes information about beneficiaries helped, expenditure to date and future sustainability of the project Between 6 and 9 months there will be a visit to the project from the WY-FI Hub Team and a mystery shopper or beneficiary insight exercise A 12 month project evaluation report to WY-FI Hub, to include information about expenditure, beneficiaries and service user evaluation to be shared with the WY-FI Local Evaluation Team based at Sheffield Hallam University (CRESR) Outcome 4 8 60 peer mentor trained MIS ETE delivery partner ensures; 60 service users complete peer mentor training (12 from each locality supported by Navigator teams) Outcome 3 9 Recruitment, selection and induction of 3 Trainee posts Trainees in post Navigator Teams / ETE team Outcome 3 10 Locality Partners signed up to provide 30 work placements ETE activity Each of the Delivery Partners provides at least one work placement with other opportunities provided by other Locality services Outcome 3 11 Co-produced research, evaluation, review and of delivery and project plans completed Research and Evaluation Team Local Evaluation Partner Peer research undertaken 80 Beneficiary/Expert involvement in evaluation of services and service user experience (Insight) Navigator team support peer researchers to engage with beneficiaries -16 per Locality Outcome 3 and 4