zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
(1980). Lynne ForsterLee & Irwin A. Horowitz, The Effects of Jury-Aid Innovations on Juror Performance in Complex Civil Trials, 86 Judicature 184 (2003). Lynne ForsterLee & Irwin A. Horowitz, Enhancing Juror Competence in a Complex Trial, 11 Applied Cognitive Psychol. 305 (1997). Lynne ForsterLee et al., Effects of Notetaking on Verdicts and Evidence Processing in a Civil Trial, 18 Law & Hum. Behav. 567 (1994). Lynne ForsterLee et al., Juror Competence in Civil Trials: Effects of Preinstruction and Evidence Technicality, 78 J. Applied Psychol. 14 (1993). Paula L. Hannaford et al., The Timing of Opinion Formation by Jurors in Civil Cases: An Empirical Examination, 67 Tenn. L. Rev. 627, 650 (2000). Paula L. Hannaford et al., Permitting Jury Discussions During Trial: Impact of the Arizona Reform, 24 Law & Hum.Behav. 359 (2000). Valerie P. Hans, Empowering the Active Jury: A Genuine Tort Reform, 13 Roger Williams U. L. Rev. 39 (2008). Valerie P. Hans, Judges, Juries, and Scientific Evidence, 16 J.L. & Pol’y 19 (2007). Valerie P. Hans, Inside the Black Box: Comment on Diamond and Vidmar, 87 Va. L. Rev. 1917 (2001). Valerie P. Hans & Stephanie Albertson, Empirical Research and Civil Jury Reform, 78 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1497 (2003). Valerie P. Hans et al., The Arizona Jury Reform Permitting Civil Jury Discussions: The Views of Trial Participants, Judges, and Jurors, 32 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 349 (1999). Larry Heuer & Steven Penrod, Trial Complexity: A Field Investigation of Its Meaning and Its Effects, 18 Law & Hum. Behav. 29 (1994). Larry Heuer & Steven Penrod, Juror Notetaking and Question Asking During Trials: A National Field Experiment, 18 Law & Hum. Behav. 121 (1994). Larry Heuer & Steven D. Penrod, Instructing Jurors: A Field Experiment with Written and
F – Safety and Risk Issues Are there any issues about the home location or family circumstances that may pose a risk to a worker’s safety? Unknown No Yes If YES, provide details Does any of the information provided in this referral suggest that a risk of significant harm report to the Child Protection Helpline should be made? Unknown No Yes If YES, the mandatory reporter guide should be completed and if indicated a report made to the child protection helpline. G – Referral approval and acceptance Brighter Futures Manager Accepts Referral (following referral processing by Brighter Futures Unit) Name Signature Date
people, and people with sensory or learning disabilities. Those whose first language is not English As part of HSCNI, CEC can access the regional contract for translation and interpreting. People with a disability CEC’s procedure for booking external venues requires those responsible for organising events and meetings ensure that venues are fully accessible. list of the information that requires up front translation into particular formats. BSO Business Plan 2016-17 In developing the policy or decision what did you do or change to address the equality issues you identified? What do you intend to do in future to address the equality issues you identified? Any requests for the Business Plan in alternative formats will be considered. of
3. Teaching Experience You must have a minimum of 3 years’ full-time TEFL/TESOL teaching experience to adult students (16 years’ and over), or equivalent part-time. Name and address of employer (include telephone number and address) Average teaching hours per week to adults (aged 16 or over) First language of the majority of students Focus of teaching (General English, Exam preparation, Business, EAP) Dates of employment (From – To, including months) Other work experience Name of Employer Duties Dates (From – To)
B7: Was any other language used for instruction at your secondary school? Yes / No If “Yes”, name the language(s). B8: Were you required to another language at either primary or secondary school? Yes / No If “Yes”, name the language(s). B9: What was the main language of instruction at tertiary level? B10: What language(s) do you use when relaxing with friends? B11: What is the official language of the country in which you currently live? B12: How long have you lived in that country? B13 Have you delivered a conference paper in English? Yes / No If “Yes”, what was the topic? IELTS PSN Manual 2016 edition – CONFIDENTIAL
These rights also include the right to alteration and the right to further service, cf. Section 39b of Act No. 2 of 12 May 1961 relating to Copyright in Literary, Scientific and Artistic Works, etc. (the Copyright Act). The Supplier shall retain the rights to its own tools and methods. Both parties may also utilise general know-how that they have accumulated in connection with the Service, provided that such know-how is not confidential. CONFIDENTIALITY OBLIGATION A confidentiality obligation in accordance with Sections 13 to 13f of the Norwegian Public Administration Act of 10 February 1967 No. 10 shall apply to the Supplier’s personnel. The personnel shall sign a confidentiality declaration before work is commenced. The Supplier’s personnel shall comply with the same rules that apply to the Client’s personnel in connection with the safeguarding of information. The Client’s ICT rules shall be distributed in connection with the call-off orders under the Framework Agreement. BREACH OF CONTRACT ON THE PART OF THE SUPPLIER There is a breach of contract on the part of the Supplier if the deliverables do not conform with the agreed functions, requirements or time limits. There is also a breach of contract if the Supplier fails to perform other duties under the Agreement. Nevertheless, there is no breach of contract if the situation is caused by circumstances related to the Client or by force majeure. The Client shall submit a written complaint without undue delay after the breach of contract has been discovered or ought to have been discovered. If the Supplier’s deliverables cannot be delivered as agreed, the Supplier shall give the Client written notice thereof as soon as possible. The notice shall specify the reason for the problem and, to the extent possible, when the deliverable can be delivered. A corresponding obligation shall apply if additional delays are to be expected after the first notice has been given. The Supplier may request an extension of the time which extension must have the written approval of the Client in order to apply. The Client shall not be entitled to claim liquidated damages or ordinary damages in respect of the period encompassed by an extension of the time limit.
Application Handling Flow and Items to be checked(1/3) (Japan DENAN, Diamond PSE Mark) 1. Application Handling Flow The outline of application handling flow of TÜV Rheinland Taiwan Ltd. (hereinafter, "TRT“) is as follows. Note: *Classification (Category A only) >> Please refer to “Scope of TRT” *If the applicant is not CoC holder, it will follow LoA. ***For application of authorized copy, please use the “Application Form for Authorized Valid Copy”. 2. Items to be checked when submitting an application The items listed below are, for conducting conformity assessment, additional items to both "Testing and Certification Regulations" and "General Business Conditions". (1) (Preparation and cooperation for conduct of conformity assessment) on “Guide for Documents/Test Sample(s) preparation”, please provide documents, product information, test sample(s), CB report (if any),etc., which are requested for conduct of conformity assessment. Please make preparation of the matters which are required for conducting conformity assessment, e.g., entering a factory/other premise, survey or browse of documents etc., interviewing the personnel, and others. (2) (Items to be preserved by applicant) Concerning conformity assessment or conformity certificate, please implement the following items: To always comply with the concerned requirements of the Electrical Appliances and Materials Safety Act (hereinafter, “DENAN”); To make all necessary arrangements for conduct of the conformity assessment; To make claims regarding certification only in respect of the scope for which conformity assessment was conducted;
Appendix No. 4 - Number of all cancer patients and newly diagnosed cancer patients treated in the cancer center 1 2 Disease site (without pediatric tumors) according to the list of tumor localizations used in the analysis of the Robert Koch Institute ('Krebs in Deutschland; 2013) modified on the basis of the National Cancer Certification Program 2015 ICD-10 Code Number of all cancer patients treated in the cancer center in 2016 Number of cancer patients diagnosed in 2016 A. Head and Neck C00-14 Larynx C32 Upper GI Tract Esophagus C15 Stomach C16 Intestine C18-21 Liver/Gall Bladder Liver C22 Gall Bladder C23-24 Pancreas C25 Lung C33-34 Malignant Melanoma C43 Bone, Articular Cartilage, Connective and Soft Tissue C40-41, C45-49 Breast/DCIS Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS) D05 Breast C50 Vulva C51 Cervix C53 Uterus C54-55 Ovary C56 Prostate C61 Testes C62 Kidney C64 Urinary Bladder C67 Central Nervous System C70-72* Thyroid C73 Morbus Hodgkin C81 Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas C82-85 Plasmocytoma C90 Leukemias C91-95 Other Hematological Malignancies C86-88, C96 (A.) B. Others** (Examples): Malignant Neoplasms of the Skin C44 Pediatric Tumors (Patients < 18 y.)*** TOTAL (A. + B.)
SENSITIVE: Legal Sensitive personal information as recognised by the Queensland Information Privacy Act 2009 – religion, sexual orientation, political affiliation SENSITIVE: Personal SENSITIVE: Cabinet, PROTECTED PROTECTED PROTECTED PROTECTED PROTECTED PROTECTED information has high confidentiality requirements i.e. Direct actual risk to individual life / lives. Example: Identities of undercover officers HIGHLY PROTECTED (HP) HP removed in 2010. Federal Agencies either reclassified to PROTECTED or SECRET depending on risk assessment or SECRET (depending on risk assessment) or SECRET (depending on risk assessment) HIGHLY PROTECTED material must be assessed by the owner to PROTECTED or SECRET depending on risk. This could be via domain classification. Refer to PSPF and Queensland Police where appropriate. Classification mappings Australian Government classification system mapping to the 2013 Queensland Government classification schema and Simplified Queensland Government classification schema
Action Measure Intended Outcome Performance Indicator and Target Timescale and Ownership 3. To agree an approach to the provision of accessible formats for BSO Improved accessibility of information Common wording relating to alternative formats for inclusion in documents. Protocol on how to deal with requests for alternative formats. For electronic communication, staff are supported to ensure that settings meet needs regarding accessible font size. Senior Management Team Year 2 BSO Information Technology Services (ITS) Year 2 Relevant Duty: Encourage participation of disabled people in public life. What we did over the last year This work is still in progress. We will finish this before the end of September 2016. Action Measure Intended Outcome Performance Indicator and Target Timescale and Ownership 4. Develop a Corporate Style Guide for BSO publications to ensure they meet minimum standards for accessibility for disabled people. Improved accessibility of information Corporate Style Guide Administrative Services Manager, Corporate Services Year 3
Facilitate Disability Awareness Training at the annual Business Planning Event and Annual Administrative Staff Event Facilitate Disability Awareness Training at an Internal Staff Workshop Include at one speaker on relevant disability issues at team meeting per year Invite a speaker from a disability group to present at our quarterly staff engagement session Training evaluations (where relevant) Record of consideration of training needs Head of Clinical Education Centre Year 3 & 4 Head of Internal Audit Year 4 Assistant Director Counter Fraud and Probity Services Year 3 onwards Head of HSC Pension Service Year 3 onwards
(3) Getting people involved in our work, Participation and Engagement Action Measure Intended Outcome Performance Indicator and Target Timescale and Ownership 12. Identify, provide and promote opportunities for more engagement for people with a disability in key work areas. Clinical Education Centre: Identify and facilitate the involvement of disabled people in our work, such as in relation to the Knowledge Understanding Framework and as programmes are reviewed or new programmes are being developed. Better engagement of people with a disability (adults and children where relevant) in key areas. Annual review of progress to ECNI. Programme development group membership list Directors and Assistant Directors Year 1 onwards Head of Clinical Education Centre Year 3 onwards
in advance of recruitment exercise Procurement and Logistics Service: Where contracts may benefit from input by disabled patients/clients PaLS staff to suggest this to the Contract Adjudication Group (and record in Pre-tender Minutes) HSC Pensions: Participation as a member of new Pension Board: request DHSSPS Policy team to promote interest from disability groups when appointing Pension Board. Pre-tender Minutes Record of communication to DHSSPS Assistant Director Procurement and Logistics Service Year 3 onwards Head of HSC Pension Service Year 3 Relevant Duty: Encourage participation by disabled people in public life. What we did over the last year Clinical Education Centre:
across different offices to talk about the network. They thought our organisations should first focus on the role of line managers. Action Measure Intended Outcome Performance Indicator and Target Timescale and Ownership 9. In collaboration with disabled people design, deliver and evaluate training for and Board Members on disability equality and disability legislation. Facilitate Disability Awareness Training at the annual Business Planning Event and Annual Administrative Staff Event Facilitate Disability Awareness Training at an Internal Audit Staff Workshop Include at least one speaker on relevant Increased staff and Board Member awareness of the range of disabilities and needs and increased ability to facilitate individuals’ disability needs. Between April 2015 and March 2018 the % of staff and Board Members who have successfully completed the disability module of Discovering Diversity has doubled each year (baseline 2015: 12% of staff) Training evaluations (where relevant) Record of consideration of training needs Directors with support from BSO Equality Unit and BSO Human Resources Year 3 Head of Clinical Education Centre Year 3 & 4 Head of Internal Audit Year 4 Assistant Director
disability issues at team meeting per year Invite a speaker from a disability group to present at our quarterly staff engagement session Arrange awareness training for staff to accommodate the assimilation of staff with specific disabilities e.g. Asperger’s Syndrome Explore bespoke training for those staff who deal with disabled clients (mainly Community Equipment and Continence Service) Counter Fraud and Probity Services Year 3 onwards Head of HSC Pension Service Year 3 onwards Assistant Director of Family Practitioner Services Year 3 Assistant Director Procurement and Logistics Service Year 3
11. Identify, provide and promote opportunities for more engagement for people with a disability in key work areas. Clinical Education Centre: Identify and facilitate the involvement of disabled people in our work, such as in relation to the Knowledge Understanding Framework and as programmes are reviewed or new programmes are being developed. Office for Research Ethics Committees: Target applications for ethics committees from Disabled People during Better engagement of people with a disability (adults and children where relevant) in key areas. Annual review of progress to ECNI. Programme development group membership list Record of engagement Recruitment advertisements Directors and Assistant Directors Year 1 onwards Head of Clinical Education Centre Year 3 onwards Head of Office for Research Ethics
Appendix 7: Ongoing trials In order to ascertain current research being undertaken in this field, a search of the clinical trials database was undertaken (www.clinicaltrials.gov). The following studies were found and have been outlined in the table below. Study Title Authors Method Anatomical areas Stage Country Hospital(s) A phase III double blind study on the efficacy of topical Aloe Vera Gel on irradiated Breast tissue Johnson JS Double blind phase III RCT into topical Aloe Vera comparing 2 over the counter aloe Vera products Breast Recruiting Lewis Hall Singletary Oncology Center at John D. , Thomasville Georgia, A Phase II Study Designed to Evaluate the Value of NeoVIDERM Skin Emulsion in the Prevention of Radiation Dermatitis for Patients Undergoing External Radiation Therapy Vuong T, . Patients are randomized to receive either the Control- standard care with Aveeno® cream until they get dry desquamation then Flamazine® vs Treatment standard care with NeoVIDERM Head and Neck, Breast Trial Terminated Jewish , , Mometasone Furoate 0.1% Versus Eucerin on Moderate to Severe Skin Toxicities in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Post mastectomy Radiation: A Randomized, Double Blind Trial A double blind RCT where patients are randomized to receive either Control – Eucerin® ( a placebo comparison) or Experimental- Mometasone Furoate 0.1% Breast Recruiting Multi center 1-memorial cancer center in 4 x Sloan-Kettering cancer centers in A Phase II Study Designed to Evaluate the Value of Alkagin Paste in the Prevention of Radiation Dermatitis - for Patients Vuong T. Standard care vs Aveeno cream (Alkagin paste) Anus, Rectum, Urogenital system Trial terminated Jewish , ,
Q2: Do you have any concerns relating to our proposal to retain regulation of ‘Arranging Credit’ as a Financial Service? If so, what are they, and how should they be addressed? Q3: Do you have any concerns relating to our proposal to separate ‘arranging credit’ from the Financial Service of ‘Arranging deals in Investments’? If so, what are they, and how should they be addressed? Q4: Do you with our proposal to continue to regulate ‘Arranging Custody’ as a stand-alone Financial Service? If not, what are your reasons? Q5: Do you have any other concerns relating to the regulation of arranging activities relating to Investments, credit and custody which need to be addressed? If so, what are they, and how should they be addressed? (b) Should we continue to regulate ‘Advising on credit’ as a Financial Service?
Appendix 9: Table of Comments Name of commentator: Name of entity (if applicable) Is your response confidential? Yes No If your response to the previous question is Yes, please state your reasons for such a request: Notes: The DFSA reserves the right to publish, including on its website, any comments you provide. However, if you wish your comments to be kept confidential, you must expressly request at the time of making comments that this should be the case. You must also provide an explanation of why you wish your comments be kept confidential. Your answers may require explanations. Please include in the second column. If you do not wish to comment on any issue, please select the “no comments” box. Ref. Response Comments on proposal Q1: Do you have any comments on, or concerns related to, the proposed rule changes? If so, what are they and how should they be addressed? Yes No comments No
Tributary TF5.5 at red buoy #107 (JR WQMP station #13); 10 m JMSTF Plankton, Benthos 12x2 37.31265 -77.23283 Tributary TF5.5A James River at buoy #91; 10 m JMSTF 12x2 -77.1284 Tributary TF5.6 James River north of buoy #74; James R. WQMP station #17; 10 m 12x2 37.27272 -76.99057 Tributary WBB05 VADEQ station 2-WBE004.44. Western branch Elizabeth R. at Drum Point; 5 m WBEMH 12x2 36.82917 -76.39583 River EBE1 Eastern branch Elizabeth R.; west side of Berkley Bridge; 8m EBEMH 12x2 36.8407 -76.28911 River ELI2 Elizabeth River mainstem; adjacent to the southeast corner of Craney Island; 13m ELIPH 12x2 36.95015 -76.3455 River SBE2 Southern branch Elizabeth R.; adjacent to Atlantic wood; 12m SBEMH 12x2 36.8134 -76.2903 River SBE5 Southern branch Elizabeth R.; adjacent to Virginia Power; 5m SBEMH Plankton 12x2 36.76987 -76.29605 River WBE1 Western branch Elizabeth River; north side of highway 17 bridge; 4 m 12x2 36.8432 -76.35939 Revised 4/11/14 MEL
Appendix A. Reproductive Hazard Questionnaire Date Name UCI ID# Dept. Phone E-mail Supervisor Phone E-mail Agents used at work – Continue on separate page if needed List Materials currently used or expect to use during period or pregnancy Frequency and Duration of use (once/day for two hours. etc. Physical State (solid, liquid, gas) Quantity used per use, in unit of time (e.g., 10 ml per wk) Protective Equipment (gloves, respirator, etc.) Controls used (fume hood, glove box, other local exhaust, radiation barrier, job rotation, etc.) Ventilation systems available to you. Tasks – Describe how material will be used. Chemical Agents: Biological Agents (and Biosafety level): Radiation: Questions about chemicals: Do other people in your area use the same chemicals? If yes, how many other people? Are any of chemicals heated? If yes, to what temperature? Which ones?
Can you smell or taste any chemical fumes or vapors where you work? If yes, which ones? Do you feel sick when you work with any of the chemicals, and feel better at other times? Do any of the chemicals you work with get on your skin? If yes, which ones? Do you have any specific health or safety concerns about your work? If so, describe: Do you work in the vivarium with live animals or animal tissues? Yes No if yes, have you updated your LAOHP Form online? Yes No Do you store or consume food or beverages in your workplace? Yes No What type of personal protective equipment do you wear while working? Eye/Face Protection Foot Protection Head Protection Safety glasses with side shields Laser safety glasses Safety goggles Face shield Welder’s helmet/ face shield Safety boots Toe caps Metatarsal guards Rubber boots Hard hat Hearing protection – earplugs, earmuffs Body Protection Hand Protection/Gloves Fall restraint/fall protection Rubber apron Disposable Tyvek lab coat/coveralls Lab coat or coveralls Welding leather sleeve guards Nomex Coveralls Other: Leather Natural rubber Cotton (coated/not coated) Nitrile Heat resistant Neoprene Chemical resistant Butyl rubber Latex Other (PVC, PVA, Viton) Cryogenic Anti-vibration Cut resistant (e.g., Kevlar) Other: Respirator Protection Filtering Face respirator (N, P or R) Air purifying respirator Supplied air line Half face APR Chemical Cartridge/Filter Types: Multi-gas/OV AG/Acid Gas OV/Organic Vapor OV/AG P-100
Equalities Impact Assessments Screening Tool Guidance 1 Summary: The Building Control Service must comply with legislation and good practice in respect of the collection fees and charges. Following the introduction of a charge for Demolition notices in 2015, the service has reviewed the time taken in dealing with the Notices and as such has to implement an increase from £180 to £200. 2 Lead Officer contact details: Bob McIver – Head of Building Control 0208 489 5500 3 Date: 25 January 2016 Response to Screening Questions Yes No Please explain your answer. If answering Yes but after consideration a full EqIA is not necessary please provide a detailed explanation for NOT undertaking a full EqIA 4 Could the proposed policy/project/function/staff restructuring/major development/ planning application or the way it is carried out have an adverse impact on any of the key equalities protected characteristics age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex, sexual orientation? Or relationships between any equalities groups? X Demolition notices are part of the development process when buildings are demolished to make way for new developments. This is national legislation (Building Act 1984) and applies throughout England. 5 Is there any indication or evidence (including from consultation with relevant groups) that different groups have or will have different needs, experiences, issues and priorities in relation to the particular policy/project/function/major development/planning application? Or do you need more information? X Demolition notices are part of the development process when buildings are demolished to make way for new developments. This is national legislation (Building Act 1984) and applies throughout England.
policy/project/function/major development/planning application? Or do you need more information? 6 If there is or will be an adverse impact, could it be reduced by taking particular measures? NO It is estimated that this increase will not have any adverse impact, there are alternative processes to request an item 7 By taking particular measures could a positive impact results? NO No impact Do nothing 8 As a result of this screening is a full EqIA necessary? NO There is not sufficient indication to suggest that a full EqIA is required.
Is the Adult at Risk aware of the referral?  Yes  No Has the Adult at Risk consented to the referral?  Yes  No Is any evidence which suggests that the adult at risk lacks mental capacity to consent to this referral?  Yes  No About the alleged abuse Type of alleged (tick all relevant boxes)  Physical  Sexual  Emotional  Neglect/Acts of Omission  Financial/Material  Discriminatory  Institutional Personal circumstances (Is the alleged victim subject to any legislative powers (e.g. Mental Health Act, Power or Attorney, etc)?)  Yes  No did the alleged abuse take place  Own Home  Perpetrators Home  Relatives Home  Supported tenancy  Sheltered Accommodation  Care Home (residential)  Care Home (nursing)  Care Home (Respite)  Hospital (NHS)  Hospital (independent)  NHS Group Home  Hospice  Day Care  Education establishment  Public Place  Within Sport (please identify): ………………………  Other (please identify): ……………………………….. Specific location: Is the abuse  Historical  Current Describe the alleged abuse/injuries
Is the alleged perpetrator a child?  Yes  No Is the alleged perpetrator of the referral?  Yes  No  Don’t know Is the alleged perpetrator to social services?  Yes  No  Don’t know If ‘yes’ please identify team responsible: If more than two people have been implicated please copy this and include all details of all individuals named. About the people who witnessed the incident(s)  were no witnesses Witness 1: Name: Address: Telephone number: Relationship to victim (if any): Is the alleged perpetrator an Adult at Risk?  Yes  No Is the alleged perpetrator a  Yes  No Is the alleged perpetrator aware of the referral?  Yes  No  Don’t know
TSP The Department will: respect TSP Members’ role, experience and expertise treat each TSP Member with courtesy and consideration meet regularly with TSP Members adhere to agreed communication protocols with TSP Members respond to TSP Members’ queries, generally within 10 Business Days work with TSP Members to resolve complaints, disputes or problems, and consider the perspective of all Participating Employers and Participants—when developing resolutions support TSP Members to implement programme changes effectively maintain the National Customer Service Line maintain the Employer Hotline to facilitate connections between Employers and TSP Members. The Department will: be transparent in our business dealings maintain honest and open communication provide consistent, accurate and timely advice maintain feedback mechanisms to support formal and informal feedback from providers consult TSP Members wherever possible, generally through industry representatives—including on contract variations provide reasonable notice for TSP Members to implement new or amended guidelines. The Department will: observe the Australian Public Service (APS) Code of Conduct and APS Values adhere to the Commonwealth Procurement Rules, including on principles of probity and ethical and fair dealings act honestly and in the best interests of the Government, the employment services industry, Participants and the community be accountable for our decisions and actions support TSP Members to comply with their deed requirements by: streamlining and simplifying guidelines providing timely feedback from contract monitoring and Programme Assurance Activities treat TSP Members’ information confidentially (subject to relevant deed provisions) exercise its rights under the Deed in good faith. The Department will: work with the industry to promote better practice and innovation regularly review TSP Member performance and deliver balanced and consistent feedback work with TSP Members to help them meet the needs of Employers and industry
St Anglican Church, Luddenham Brick Cottage, Park Road, Luddenham Cottage, Campbell Street, Luddenham Timber Cottages, 29 and 41 The Northern Road, Luddenham Register of the National Estate Kelvin, Outbuildings and Curtilage, The Retreat, Bringelly, NSW, Australia Bringelly Radio Receiving Station Complex
COMMUNITY NEED INPUTS ACTIVITIES OUTPUTS SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES MID-TERM OUTCOMES LONG-TERM OUTCOMES The community problem that the program activities (interventions) are designed to address. Resources that are necessary to deliver the program activities (interventions), including the number of locations/sites and number/type of AmeriCorps members. The core activities that define the intervention or program model that members will implement or deliver, including duration, dosage and target population. Direct products from program activities. Changes in knowledge, skills, attitudes, and opinions. These outcomes, if applicable to the program design, will almost always be measurable during the grant year. Changes in behavior or action. Depending on program design, these outcomes may or may not be measurable during the grant year. Changes in condition or status in life. Depending on program design, outcomes may or may not be measurable during the grant year. Some programs, such as environmental or capacity-building programs, may measure changes in condition over a period as short as one year.
Care funding Aged Care Funding Instrument (ACFI) funding using Flexible Care Subsidy based on number of approved high and low care places. Accommodation Funding Accommodation Supplement including a higher amount for significantly refurbished facilities. An equivalent amount based on the Concessional Resident Supplement, which preceded the accommodation supplement, is included within Flexible Care Subsidy funding (in addition to places funding). Capital costs are met by state and territory governments. Viability Supplement Yes. An equivalent amount added to Flexible Care Subsidy funding. supplements Homeless and Veterans’ Supplements. Oxygen and Enteral Feeding Supplement An equivalent amount added to Flexible Care Subsidy funding per residential place for the following supplements: Veteran’s Supplement; Respite supplement Fees charged – residential care Basic Daily Fee Yes, may be paid under circumstances of hardship. No. Rent Assistance paid on behalf of eligible residents in receipt of a means tested income support payment No. Yes. Other/ Additional Resident Fees Yes, at discretion of provider in agreement with consumer. Yes, at discretion of provider in agreement with consumer. RADs/DAPs for non-supported residents Yes. Yes, may be determined by state/territory government legislation. RACs/DACs for partially supported residents Yes. No. Home Care Funding - Australian Government Available programmes Home Care Programme – Levels Commonwealth Home Support Programme. Block funding using Flexible Care Subsidy - Home care places. Commonwealth Home Support Programme. Supplements Dementia and Cognition and Veterans’ Supplement. EACHD Top Up Supplement. Oxygen and An equivalent amount added to Flexible Care Subsidy funding per home care place for the following
Enteral Feeding Supplements. Home Care Viability Supplement. supplements: Dementia and Cognition and Veterans’ Supplement; Home Care Viability Supplement. State and Territory Government Funding Residential aged care and accommodation State/territory and Local Government owned services may receive supplementary or additional funding from state/local government. governments may elect to supplement Commonwealth government funding. All recurrent funding is pooled for flexible use by each MPS. All capital costs are met by state and territory governments. Home care State/Territory and local government owned services may receive supplementary or additional funding from state/local government. State/territory governments may elect to supplement Commonwealth Government funding. All recurrent funding is pooled for flexible use by each MPS. Compliance Prudential Standards Annual Prudential Compliance Statement (ACPS). General Purpose Financial Reporting (GPFR). Annual Prudential Compliance Statement. Planning and Reporting to state/territory governments. Accreditation Standards Quality Aged Care Principles- Aged Care Act 1997. Aged Care Complaints Scheme. The National Safety and Quality Health Service (NSQHS) Standards. Aged Care Complaints Scheme.
Appendix C-3: Existing Asset Purchase (in whole or in part) Information Required in Bid Proposals If the Bidder’s Proposal is for an interest in an existing facility where PacifiCorp holds an interest, or operates the facility, any information requested under this RFP that would reasonably be expected to already be in the possession of PacifiCorp, may be so stated in the Bidder’s response package. If the Bidder’s asset is not currently involved with PacifiCorp, the below requirements are to be met as outlined. In general, PacifiCorp expects Bidders to provide any information that could impact the cost, reliability, dispatch frequency, output capability or performance of a resource. PacifiCorp believes these resource attributes largely consist, but may not be limited to, the following information categories: Impact of Temperature on Output – If Project output will vary with ambient conditions, capacity, and any associated performance impact, should be stated in of conditions expected during a summer day, with ambient air conditions of 95oF and 20% relative humidity, and a winter day with ambient conditions of 20oF and 75% relative humidity. The Bidder will complete Exhibit 1 to Appendix C. showing performance at specific ambient conditions, with and without duct firing and/or power augmentation and other resource information. In the event that the temperature/relative humidity values in Exhibit 1 to Appendix C do not match local conditions, the Bidder shall modify the performance tables accordingly. To the extent pricing, capacity and/or availability vary based on specific characteristics of the facility, the Bidder shall clearly identify those relationships in tabular form. Impact of Other Factors on Output – PacifiCorp prefers generation facilities designed, permitted, and operated so that, to the extent practicable, the proposed capacity and any related energy provided to PacifiCorp is not restricted by: Environmental permits or other environmental limitation or environmental forfeitures Hours of operation Sales of capacity or energy to other parties Interruption of primary fuel supply of thermal energy Any other factor relevant to the technology (noise, agreements with neighbors, etc.) Bidders shall describe in detail any such limitations in their Proposal Ability to provide additional capacity over the net capable rating Non-environmental or technology factors that could encumber the facility Water availability Ownership Purchase Option – Bidders may propose a sale, either whole or in part, of existing generation assets to PacifiCorp. Such proposals must include the following information in addition to any technical information: Ownership percentage and whether a divided or undivided interest
(Surplus) / Deficit (198) (3,233) A comprehensive review of the Housing Revenue Account and associated landlord functions has been carried out during 2017-18 following the implementation of the Place Review. HRA Estimates by Income & Expenditure 2017-18 to 2018-19 Description 2017-18 Estimate 2018-19 Estimate Variance £000 £000 £000 Rent Income – Dwellings (15,024) (14,713) 311 Charges for Services & facilities (958) (1,178) (220) Total Income (15,982) (15,891) 91 Repairs & Maintenance 3,486 3,317 (169) Supervision & Management 2,413 2,655 242 Service Charge Costs 1,129 1,234 105 Depreciation 2,300 2,923 623 Provision for Doubtful Debts 119 169 50 Total Expenditure 9,447 10,298 852 Contribution from Operations (6,535) (5,593) 943 Financing charges 2,360 2,360 - Capital Expenditure charged to Revenue 3,977 - (3,977) Net operating (surplus)/Deficit (198) (3,233) (3,035) Explanation of Budget Variations Rent Income - Dwelling Rents In determining future rental income the following factors have been taken into account: A rent reduction of 1% from 17-18 to 19-20 and nil inflation imposed by the Government. The Council had 3,804 HRA dwellings at 1st 2017 with an average weekly rent of £76.32 (on a 52 week basis). The average rent in 2017-18 will be £75.57 per week An assumed rent loss of 1% for void properties and 1.5% for bad and Estimated net rent arising from additional units included within the HRA capital programme from 2019/10 onwards. Charges for Services and Facilities Sewage Charges Historically charges for sewage have been increased in line with the annual increase applied by Anglian Water. Charges were increased by 2.5% in 2017-18 to catch up for several years’ increases which had not been actioned. For 2018-19 it is proposed that charges be increased in line with the annual increase applied by Anglian Water. This
Uniform Closing Dataset (UCD) Specification Issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Appendix C: Sample Closing Disclosures with Reference Numbers Document Version 1.4 March 29, 2016 n support of the Integrated Mortgage Closing Disclosure under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (Regulation X) And the Truth In Lending Act (Regulation Z) Issued by the CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU Published in the Federal Register on December 31, 2013 Published in the Federal Register on December 31, 2013 And all subsequent amendments: (Feb. 19, 2015) (July 24, 2015) 80 FR 80228 (December 24, 2015) This document relates to the Uniform Mortgage Data Program®, an effort undertaken jointly by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae at the direction of their regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency. ©2016 Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. All Rights Reserved. MISMO® is a registered trademark of the Mortgage Industry Standards Maintenance Organization. Revision Log
Theatre/Staging Rigging Annual Inspection Checklist HEMP RIGGING SYSTEM Instructions: 1) Inspect each component listed in the “description” column for damage/function. 2) Place a “checkmark” if the component passes. 3) Place an “X” if the component fails. 3a) If component fails complete the “notes” section below. 4) Write “N/A” if component is not part of the rigging system. Facility Name: Inspected by: Date: Description Lineset # Lineset # Lineset # Lineset # Lineset # Lineset # Lineset # Lineset # Lineset # Lineset # Head Block Loft Block Pin Rail Belaying Pins Sandbags Trim Clamps Rope condition Batten Connection at Batten/Termination Note: Deficiency - Corrective Action - Date Corrective Action completed -
APPENDIX C: EMPLOYEE AND COVERED NON-EMPLOYEE COMPLAINT FORM FOR REPORTING SEXUAL HARASSMENT New York State Labor Law requires all employers to adopt a sexual harassment prevention policy that includes a complaint form for employees and covered non-employees to report in writing alleged incidents of sexual harassment. If you believe that you have been subjected to sexual harassment, you are encouraged to complete this form and submit it to the Title IX Coordinator. You will not be retaliated against for filing a complaint. If you are more comfortable reporting verbally or in another manner, the College is still required to follow its sexual harassment prevention policy by investigating the claims as outlined at the end of this form. For additional resources, visit: COMPLAINANT INFORMATION Name: Department: Home Address: Work Phone: Home Phone: Job Email: Select Preferred Communication Method: Email Work Home In person SUPERVISORY INFORMATION Immediate Supervisor’s Name: Title: Work Phone: Department:
Work Analyst Estates and Ancillary Youth Worker Add Prof Scientific and Technical Please note that the values are part of the National Workforce Data Set (NWD). The NWD is reviewed on a continuous basis to ensure that it remains fit for purpose and is updated to reflect any changes to workforce policies and practices. The NWD Data Set Specification and further relevant documentation can be found here:
Appendix C: Shared Risk and Protective Factor Chart for Violence Type of Violence Perpetration Maltreatment Teen Dating Violence Intimate Partner Violence Sexual Violence Youth Violence Bullying Suicide Elder Maltreatment Risk Factors Community Neighborhood Poverty X X X X X High alcohol outlet density X X X X X Community Violence X X X X Diminished economic opportunities/high unemployment rates X X X X X Poor neighborhood support and cohesion X X X X X Societal Cultural norms that support aggression toward others X X X X X X Media Violence X X X X Societal income inequity X X X X Weak health, educational, economic, and social policies/laws X X X X Harmful norms around masculinity/femininity X X X X X X Protective Factors
Appendix D Aerial/Scissor Lift Hands-On Operator Training Evaluation Form Trainee Name: Work Unit: Evaluator Name: Department: Equipment Manufacturer: Date: Model: NOTE: Hands-On Operator Training must be completed for each type of aerial lift utilized. Step Evaluation N/A Pass Fail 1. Pre-use equipment inspection Including but not limited to: safety devices, air/hydraulic/fuel system for cable/wiring harnesses for damage, loose/missing parts, tires and wheels, placards/warnings/and control markings, outriggers/stabilizers and other structures, guardrail system, other items as specified in owner’s manual. 2. Inspect Worksite Including but not limited to: drop-offs or holes, slopes, bumps and floor obstructions, debris, overhead obstructions and electrical hazards, inadequate surface and support to withstand all load forces, wind and weather conditions, presence of bystanders, other unsafe conditions. 3. Function test of lower control station. Done to determine if there are any malfunctions. 4. Utilize fall protection equipment Face the machine. Maintain 3 point contact with ladder/hand rails (two hands, one foot OR two feet, one hand). 5. Function test of bucket / platform / basket control station. Done to determine if there are any malfunctions. 6. Drive and creep / inch forward and reverse. Move approximately 10 feet in a driving mode. Creep approximately 5 feet. Verify unit balance and stability. Step Evaluation N/A Pass Fail
7. Turn vehicle 360 degrees right and left. Minimum disturbance of aerial lift platform. Verify unit balance and stability. 8. Boom up & down, in & out. Fully extend, fully raise. Minimum disturbance of aerial platform. Verify unit balance and stability. 9. Rotate/swing boom 360 degrees in each direction. Minimum disturbance of aerial platform. Verify unit balance and stability. 10. Tilt platform in each direction. Minimum disturbance of aerial platform. Verify unit balance and stability. 11. Turn off machine using emergency stop function. Locate and use emergency stop function. 12. Park and shutdown aerial lift. Minimum disturbance of aerial platform. Verify unit balance and stability. 13. Dismount safely. Face the machine when dismounting. Maintain 3 point contact with ladder/handrails (two hands, one foot OR two feet, one hand) 14. Deploy/setup and store outriggers. Follow manufacturer’s guidance. Refer to owner’s manual. 15. Comments Must be included for all “Failed” tasks. If task is failed the evaluator must explain what was done incorrectly and have the trainee repeat the task until it is completed correctly. Trainee Signature Evaluator Signature
How has your life changed since being in the (program/service)? Have you been able to do things that you had to stop doing? Are you more confident that you can manage your health condition on a regular basis? Were there certain activities of daily living (such as dressing, showering, grooming, shopping and domestic duties) that people had difficulty with before? Has this changed? Were there certain personal or social activities that stopped or were difficult (such as visiting friends and family, participating in sport, hobby or social clubs, volunteering, taking part in cultural, language or faith communities?). Has this changed? How did the (program/service) help you to change things in a positive way? Probe to identify and explore experiences of participants who feel they have not changed and why. How well is your care coordinated? Note: If the term ‘coordinated’ is confusing for participants, ‘joined up’ is a suitable synonym. How well do the people providing your care work together? How often did or do you have to repeat information that you had already provided? Has anybody else had a similar experience? Does anybody have anything different? Probe experiences of fragmentation. Were you involved as much as you wanted to be in decisions about your care and treatment? Thinking on your experiences that you shared are there ways the (program/service) could be made better? What works? What doesn’t? If someone you knew needed help, who you put them in contact with? If you could change one thing about the program/service, what would it be? Does anybody else have anything different to add? What did you value most about the program/service? How come? Does anybody else have anything different to add or discuss?