Planning The submission of a final comprehensive overall training outline and programme. Detailed outcomes and service levels required: No. Outcome Training Provider Responsibility Fasset Responsibility 1.1 Submit a comprehensive training programme (plan) for the provision of a two-day PIVOTAL Workshops on Business Writing and Presentation Skills for learners employed on learnerships and internships with firms registered with Fasset of which 97% are SMMEs. Compile and submit a and then final plan and forward to Fasset for approval including as a minimum: Breakdown of time allocated to each Outline of the: Invitation (draft) Handbook (draft and final) Slide presentation (draft and final) Tools and templates (draft and final) Self-assessment questions and answers (draft and final) One-page article on the course (draft and final) Methodology of planning, implementing and reporting for this event The outline of the topics (over and the ones suggested above) is to be covered in the course must be specified in the proposal response. Approve and sign-off the invitation, handbook, slide presentation, questions and answers and a one-page article on the course. Business Writing and Presentation Skills Workshop content is available on the Fasset website. This content will need to be updated in line with new trends and new content areas required in the scope above, i.e. the programme must be PIVOTAL. Use the link below as guidance. (MS Word: 47 Kb) (Microsoft PowerPoint: 678 Kb) (MS Word: 975 Kb) Vet and approve the CVs of the speaker/trainers who will be presenting the course topic assessment sub-
A compulsory full-scale rehearsal of a complete course to be conducted prior to the public courses commencing. This is to ensure that all ‘gremlins’ are identified, and that the level and content of the course is acceptable. Ensure that approved speakers are available for full-scale rehearsal which will be scheduled to take place in the month of March 2017. Subsequent to this rehearsal changes to the material, content, level and timing of the course may be required. 2. Course Development The development of a suitable and appropriate training programme, delegate handbook, slide presentation, delegate self-assessment questions and answers, draft invitation content and a one-page summary article. Detailed outcomes and service levels required: No. Outcome Training Provider Responsibility Fasset Responsibility 2.1 Delivery of a PIVOTAL course to a standard suitable to Fasset learner. Refer to the Fasset website for full information on the Fasset sector membership. The course material and two-day course (see draft agenda below) must train Fasset stakeholders to ensure (but not limited to) an The course material and two-day course (see draft agenda below) must train Fasset stakeholders to ensure (but is not limited to) an intermediate understanding of the on Business Writing and Presentation Skills as it is applicable to professionals in the Fasset sector. The service provider will not need to provide Fasset with an entirely new presentation. Content will need to be updated in line with new trends and any new content areas required in Approve and sign-off the invitation, handbook, presentation, tools and templates, self-assessment questions and answers and a one-page article on the course.
Capability of to be used / CV’s 40 Expertise in the content of the subject Relevant experience in the content of the subject they will listing previous training and course content. 20 Expertise in facilitation/training Relevant experience in the facilitating/training, information to be included in the CV. 10 CVs of team (incl. backup speakers) Detailed CVs clearly indicating 10 Contactable references 20
Detail of reference letters or assignment undertaken on a similar work in the past 24 months with contact information from 3 clients for the speakers proposed Separate reference letter for each speaker clearly highlighting speaker’s name, the facilitated and number of delegates in those training. 4 and more references = 10 points 3 references = 7 points 2 or less references = 3 points 10 Detail of reference letters or assignment undertaken on a similar work in the past 24 months with contact information from 3 clients for the company proposed Each reference letter should clearly indicate the type of assignment undertaken with contacts. The duration of that assignment and the cost of the assignment. 4 and more references = 10 points 3 references = 7 points 10
The Fasset may decide to have compulsory presentations made either by all bidders who have obtained at least 70% of the marks for functionality, or by the bidders ranked first to a maximum of six, but not less than the three highest scoring bidders, once the price and preference marks have been combined. Presentations shall only affect the marks awarded for functionality. If the Fasset wishes to use presentations to discriminate between bidders, the evaluation criteria to be affected shall be determined in advance and due allowance made in the mark scheme and indicated in paragraph 1.2.1. Points determined by the presentation will be awarded to each bidder by each member of the Bid Evaluation Committee and then an average calculated. Such score will be added to the original score for functionality. A bidder will be disqualified if the combined score for functionality fails to meet the minimum threshold for functionality as per paragraph 1.2.1. ELIMINATION OF PROPOSALS ON GROUNDS OF FUNCTIONALITY Bids that score less than 70% of the marks available for functionality will be eliminated from further consideration. Marks will therefore not be awarded for their cost proposals or for preference. PRICE AND B –BBEE STATUS LEVEL POINTS All remaining bids will be evaluated as follows: The 80/20 preference point system will be applied. Points for price and B-BBEE status level certificate will be awarded in accordance with the stipulations in the Preference Point Claim Form in terms of the Preferential Procurement Regulations, 2011. If appropriate, implied contract price adjustments will be made to the cost proposals of all remaining quotations. The point scored for the B-BBEE status level certificate for each acceptable quotation will now be added to the price point. The Evaluation Committee may recommend that the contract be awarded to the respondent obtaining the highest aggregate mark as determined by 1.2.1 or to a lower scoring quotation on justifiable grounds. SUMMARY OF ALL ROLE PLAYERS