zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Neighborhood Association of the Back Bay, Inc. v. Federal Transit Authority Citation: Neighborhood Ass'n of The Back Bay, Inc. v. Fed. Transit Admin., 407 F. Supp. 2d 323 (D. Mass. 2005), aff'd, Neighborhood Ass'n Of The Back Bay, Inc. v. Fed. Transit Admin., 463 F.3d 50 (1st Cir. 2006). Law Interpreted/ Governing Law: Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act; 49 C.F.R. § 37. Fact Summary: defendants, the Federal Transit Authority and the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, sought to make certain accessibility improvements to Copley Station, one of the oldest subway stations in the country. Plaintiffs intervened, alleging that the improvement violated Sections 106 and 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act and Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act. Issue: whether defendants’ plan for improving accessibility to Copley Station as required under Title II of the ADA violated relevant sections of the National Historic Preservation Act and the Department of Transportation Act. Holding: defendant’s determination that there was no adverse effect under the National Preservation Act met the procedural requirements contained in that Act. The defendants here invested time in identifying the historic properties encompassed by the accessibility improvement project and met with and considered the suggestions of the affected parties. Additionally, the finding that there was no adverse effect was supported by appropriate documents, including a report made by the defendants’ under Section 106 of the Act. Additionally, the procedural requirements imposed by Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act which mandates a consideration of the impact on the historic properties and a determination about other feasible and prudent alternatives were adequately followed. Here, the potential effects on historic properties were greatly weighed, but it was ultimately determined that no feasible and prudent alternative existed. Relevance to Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Other Non-Motorized Transportation: This case addresses the potential conflicts between the transportation facility accessibility requirements of the ADA and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act. Transportation improvement projects meant to increase accessibility will likely move forward as long as the impact on historic properties and other prudent alternatives are considered. trial
Section Conclusions & Recommendations 8 Purpose of the Conclusion & Recommendation Section: The Conclusion & Recommendation Section provides the reader with a selected alternative based on an overall evaluation of the alternatives in terms of impact, risk, and cost/benefit. Specific recommendations for moving the project forward are also presented. Conclusions Description: This section will recap each of the alternatives based on their Business & Operational Impact, Project Risk Assessment, and Value Analysis. Based on these results, a conclusion on which alternative should be chosen is made. Traditional P3 Business & Operational Impact Describe overall assessment Describe overall assessment Risk Assessment Describe overall assessment Describe overall assessment Quantifiable Value Analysis Describe overall assessment Describe overall assessment Non-quantifiable Value Analysis Describe overall assessment Describe overall assessment Choose the recommended alternative based on the above recap, selecting the alternative that maximizes the effectiveness and efficiency, minimizes the government’s exposure to risk, and clearly shows value for money. Identify how payments will be accommodated within the Ministry's Business Plan and the government's fiscal plan. Recommendations Description: This section will make specific recommendations on proceeding with the project using a P3 approach. The extent of the recommendation may range from recommending approval for full project implementation to recommending a more detailed requirements analysis be done to validate some key P3 analysis components. Section
proxies for academic tenacity; other indicators include student self-discipline and the extent to which teachers press students for effort and rigor. College knowledge is the knowledge base and contextual skills that enable students to successfully access and navigate college. Examples of college knowledge indicators are students’ knowledge of the financial requirements for college and high schools’ promotion of a college-going culture. Find at: Implementing Academic Interventions from REL Southeast This info-graphic illustrates the necessary components in the complex process of developing and delivering academic interventions successfully. Minimum Admission Standards for State Universities and UMass from Massachusetts Department of Higher Education This Reference Guide provides detailed information about the minimum standards for undergraduate admission to Massachusetts’ state universities and University of Massachusetts (UMass) campuses (UMass Amherst, UMass Boston, UMass Dartmouth, and UMass Lowell). The definition of College & Career Readiness from Massachusetts Board of Elementary and Secondary Education Massachusetts students who are college and career ready and prepared for civic life demonstrate the knowledge, skills and abilities that are necessary to successfully complete entry-level, credit-bearing college courses, participate in certificate or workplace training programs, enter economically viable career pathways, and engage as active and responsible citizens in our democracy.
Agency/Facility: Amount Recycled (AFY) Total Disposal Type Industrial Use Municipal Use Other Conjunctive Use/GW Recharge Total Big Bear A. R. W. Agency 3,114 3,114 0 City of Beaumont WWTP #1 City of Colton Water Rec.Fac. City of Treatment Plants 0 1,265 0 0 0 1,962 3,227 12,570 LSD, DP, OT City of Redlands WWTP 61 NA NA NA NA NA 61 City of Rialto Wastewater TP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 City of Riv. Reg. WQCP 1 0 0 0 0 174 175 33,832 LSD City of San Bernardino WRP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26,500 To RIX Facility EMWD – all treatment plants 461 3,245 --- 1,950 11,970 14,987 32,613 4,902 LSD EVMWD Reg. WW Recl. Plant 0 0 5,481 0 0 0 5,481 729 LSD EVMWD – Railroad Canyon 0 0 109 0 0 474 584 0 None
Personal data record category Mandated retention period Record owner CRM data – inclusive of Name, Email address, mobile number, address, emails and phone call summaries, DPO information Retained whilst organisation remains a customer or deleted by user. Sales team IT Personal data record category Mandated retention period Record owner Recycle Bins Cleared monthly Individual employee Downloads Cleared monthly Individual employee Inbox All emails containing PII attachments deleted after 3 years. Individual employee Deleted Emails Cleared monthly Individual employee Personal Network Drive Reviewed quarterly, any documents containing PII Individual employee
Appendix IIb Surgical Procedures – an Australian experience Prospective of current use of Intraoperative Cell Salvage at the Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital (RBWH), Brisbane, Australia – May to October 2012. Procedures with most benefit from prospective observational study – RBWH: Surgical speciality Type of Procedure Autotransfused units per case on average General Surgery Laparotomy +Liver laceration 2 Gynaecology Uterine Myomectomy 4 abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) 1 Obstetrics Lower section caesarean section (LSCS) for placenta percreta 3 LSCS for Placenta accreta 1 Orthopaedics Multilevel (>3 level) posterior fusion 1 Urology Radical Prostatectomy 2 Vascular Abdominal aortic aneurism repair (AAA) elective 1 AAA ruptured 2 Re-implantation of renal artery 4 Procedures with but still significant, potential benefit from prospective observational study – RBWH: Surgical speciality Type of Procedure Autotransfused units per case on average Orthopaedic Total Hip replacement 0.33 knee replacement 0.25 Vascular Aorto-bifemoral 0.56 Procedures that showed less cost-benefit from prospective observational – RBWH:
The trainee demonstrated, in a clinical setting, that they could: DO S EW PL WQ OQ Assessor’s Initials Date Apply standard precautions for infection control and other necessary health and safety measures. DO Direct Observation S Simulation EW Expert Witness PL Prior Learning (evidence required) WQ Written Questions OQ Oral Questions
and have the supervisor for the thesis assigned (Martin Bak Jørgensen). I establish contact with Martin and start to discuss further details of PB, RQ’s and research design. This leads to further readings into social movement theory and a re-reading into cultural theory. questions which allowed better for reading into the theoretical aspects and for exploring research design, methodology and methods, angle, etc. I had some unanswered questions about thesis requirement, formulations, etc. that could not be solved until the sparring process with a supervisor was initiated. Having done so, the research design and PB cold be established and the initial writings started. choices for the cabinet and for other official posts. FCN-Nación has gained increasing influence in congress tough an influx of officials from other parties (‘transfuguismos’) and several cases of controversy are still appearing, also in connection with Jimmy Morales (for instance the case of Sherry Ordoñéz and Jimmy Morales choices of officials for his cabinet and for public posts (criticized avidly for being exchanges of ‘political favors). Meanwhile, further public dept is approved while fiscal revenue is still not improving and several public assets are in serious need of funds (especially public hospitals which I got to see for myself). No major demonstrations have occurred, however. March 2016 Return from GT on March 15th. Writing process is initiated and writing on theoretical chapters and methodology is in process. Correspondence with Martin Bak Jørgensen is kept up and the GT news are kept covered for further developments in the political landscape. At the moment, the movement seems to have lost momentum, and although there are still many smaller mobilizations for various causes, there is nothing the like of the demonstrations of 2015. During the stay I have ensured to establish contact with as many people as possible in order to pavethe way for further interviews if necessary and for asking questions to persons who have been involved with and participated in the social movements though direct empirical data has been difficult to obtain because of a lack of concrete research design until February. All developments from news sources have, however, been noted as well as the history been inquired much closer. This also provided a unique opportunity to experience not just people’s aspirations, Judgement has still not been passed on Baldetti and Molina.
APPENDICES The following appendices are incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement by reference. Appendix I - General Definitions I-1 Appendix II - Description of Project & II-1 Appendix III – Operational Characteristics III-1 Appendix IV – Initial Delivery Date Confirmation Letter IV-1 Appendix V – PG&E’s Supply Chain Responsibility Policy V-1 Appendix VI – Attestations & Certifications VI Appendix VI-A – Certification for Commercial Operation VI-A - 1 Appendix VI-B –Project Modification Certification VI-B - 1 Appendix VI-C – Engineer Attestation VI-C - 1 Appendix VI-D ¬ Seller Attestation VI-D - 1 Appendix VII – Form of Letter of Credit VII-1 Appendix VIII - Form of Consent to Assignment VIII-1 Appendix IX – Milestones IX-1 Appendix X – Notices X-1 Appendix XI – Project Safety Plan and Documentation XII-1
Appendix F. Timeliness Requirements Overview In this Chapter This chapter contains a quick reference table for all timeliness measures. Chapter Topic Section Description of Timeliness Measure and Page Number (1) Specially Adapted Housing (SAH) Application Eligibility (7) Outreach to Veterans Not Yet Rated (b) Verify Application Information When the Regional Loan Center (RLC) receives an application (VA Form 26-4555) from a Veteran, regardless of the method of submission, SAH personnel must contact the Veteran within 7 business days to verify the information provided in the application. (1-12) (2) Approval, Initial Interview (1) General Information About the Initial Interview (b) When to Perform Within 7 business days of eligibility being established, the SAH Agent must notify the Veteran of initial interview eligibility in writing using either the FL 26-39 (the SAH eligibility letter) or the FL 26-39b (the Special Housing Adaptation [SHA] eligibility letter). (2-2) (2) Pre-Grant Approval Initial Interview (1) General Information About the Initial Interview (c) Telephone Interview If a telephone interview was completed, and the Veteran indicates they are interested in a Plan 3 SAH grant use, a feasibility study must be completed within 30 business days of the telephone interview. (2) Pre-Grant Approval Initial Interview (1) General Information the Initial Interview (d) Timeliness Requirements The initial interview must be completed within 30 business days of eligibility. (2-3) (2) Approval Initial Interview (4) Documenting the Initial Interview and Follow Up (c) Follow Up The SAH Agent must follow up with the Veteran within 30 business days of the initial interview to review items discussed during the interview. The SAH Agent must continue to contact the Veteran every 30 days up to grant approval or until the case is made inactive (2-8). (2) Pre-Grant Approval Initial Interview (4) Documenting the Initial Interview and Follow Up (d) Veteran Inactivity If the Veteran becomes non-responsive after the initial interview, the SAH Agent may place the case on inactive status after three attempts to contact the Veteran at successive 30 business day intervals. The first 30 business day interval begins on the day after the initial interview is completed. (2-9) Continued on next page
Appendix G. References Overview In this Chapter This chapter contains the following topics. Topic Topic Name See Page 1 United States Code (statute) G-2 2 Code of Federal Regulations (regulations) G-3 1. United States Code Change Date February 12, 2014, Change 1 This entire section has been updated. a. Statute for Specially Adapted Housing (SAH) Title 38 United States Code, Chapter 21 – Specially Adapted Housing for Disabled Veterans gives the statutory authority for the SAH Grant program. b. Text The most current version for 38 United States Code, Chapter 21 – Specially Adapted Housing for Disabled Veterans is located on the webpage. 2. Code of Federal Regulations Change Date February 12, 2014, Change 1 This entire section has been updated. a. Regulation for SAH Title 38 Code of Federal Regulations § 36.4400 et al contains the regulatory authority for the SAH Grant program.
proceeding/litigation? Include your organization’s parent organization, affiliates, and subsidiaries in this response. E.4 Identify whether your organization has had any contract listed in response to E.1 terminated or not renewed within the past five (5) years. If so, describe the reason(s) for the termination/nonrenewal, the parties involved, and provide the address and telephone number of the client; and If the contract was terminated/non-renewed, based on your organization’s performance, describe any action taken to prevent any future occurrence of the problem leading to the termination/non-renewal. Include your organization’s parent organization, affiliates, and subsidiaries in this response. 10 E.5 Provide evidence of current accreditation by national entity – either URAC or NCQA for at least one state product line listed in response to E.1. If you have national accreditation, have you ever had your accreditation status (e.g., NCQA) in any state for any product line adjusted down, suspended, or revoked? If so, identify the state and product line and provide an explanation. Include your organization’s parent organization, affiliates, and subsidiaries in this response. 2 E.6 Provide as an attachment a copy of the most recent external quality review report (pursuant to Section 1932(c)(2) of the Social Security Act) for the Medicaid contract identified in response to item B.1 E.1 of this section that had the largest number of enrollees as of January 1, 2014. Provide the entire report. In addition, provide a copy of any corrective action plan(s) requested of your organization as a result of this review. 3
This brings to our attention probably the most egregious misuse of these codes, or lack of their use. Primarily because Medicare does not cover these services, providers have long had a tendency to substitute 99214 or 99215 for preventive services because the history and examinations were often similar in their breadth and depth. When two services are provided, for example an annual preventive service and the management of several chronic problems – code both. These services are notable for the fact that there is no medical decision making in their description. Check with other commercial or third-party payers to see if there is a protocol or method of reporting combined services of this nature. Many carriers will not pay for two such services on the same day, or their computer systems will routinely deny one of the codes. Bring the situation to their attention. Quick Comparison Preventive Medicine Services – New Patient E/M Code Patient Status Age History Exam Medical Decision Making1 99381 No complaints Under 1 year Age and gender appropriate Age and gender appropriate Ordering lab/diagnostic procedures 99382 No complaints 1-4 years Age and gender appropriate Age and gender appropriate Ordering lab/diagnostic procedures 99383 No complaints 5-11 years Age and gender appropriate Age and gender appropriate Ordering lab/diagnostic procedures 99384 No complaints 12-17 years Age and gender appropriate Age and gender appropriate Ordering lab/diagnostic procedures 99385 No complaints 18-39 Age and gender appropriate Age and gender appropriate Ordering lab/diagnostic procedures No complaints 40-64 years Age and gender appropriate Age and gender appropriate Ordering lab/diagnostic procedures 99387 No complaints 65 and over Age and gender appropriate Age and gender appropriate Ordering lab/diagnostic procedures
Quick Comparison Preventive Medicine Services – Established Patient E/M Code Patient Status Age History Exam Medical Decision Making1 99391 No complaints Under 1 year Age and gender appropriate Age and gender appropriate Ordering lab/diagnostic procedures 99392 No complaints 1-4 years Age and gender appropriate Age and gender appropriate Ordering lab/diagnostic procedures No complaints 5-11 Age and gender appropriate Age and gender appropriate Ordering lab/diagnostic procedures 99394 No complaints 12-17 years Age and gender appropriate Age and gender appropriate Ordering lab/diagnostic procedures 99395 No complaints 18-39 years Age and gender appropriate Age and gender appropriate Ordering lab/diagnostic procedures 99396 No complaints 40-64 years Age and gender appropriate Age and gender appropriate Ordering lab/diagnostic procedures 99397 No complaints 65 and over Age and gender appropriate Age and gender appropriate Ordering lab/diagnostic procedures 1 Includes age appropriate immunizations, laboratory/diagnostic procedures and age appropriate counseling/anticipatory guidance and risk factor reduction intervention(s).
and any other compensation to the physician or physician group to influence the use of referral services). Bonuses and other compensation that are not based on referral levels (such as bonuses based solely on quality of care furnished, patient satisfaction, and participation on committees) are not considered payments for purposes of this subpart. Referral Services - Any specialty, inpatient, outpatient, or laboratory services that a physician or physician group orders or arranges, but does not furnish. Risk Threshold - The maximum risk, if the risk is based on referral services, to which a physician or physician group may be exposed under a physician incentive plan without being at substantial financial risk. The risk threshold is 25 percent. Withhold - A percentage of payments or set dollar amount that an organization deducts for a physician’s service fee, capitation, or salary payment, and that may or may not be returned to the physician, depending on the specific predetermined factors.
n 0.67 0.45 – 0.75 p 1.07 1.0 – 1.4 c 1.78E-05 1.00E-6 – 3.16E-4 q 1.96 >1.8 d (km) 0.79 >0.63 k ((years)^(p-1)) 2.84E-03 3.79E-4 – 4.97E-3 The best-fit p-value is 1.07, with values in the range 1.0–1.4 having log-likelihoods within 5 percent of the maximum log-likelihood (over a reasonable range of values for the other parameters). The best-fit p-value is lower than the preferred p=1.37 of Felzer and others (2003) for California, but the range encompasses this value. (This direct p-value describes only the direct aftershocks, as distinct from the apparent p-value for a full aftershock sequence including secondary triggering.) The preferred c-value is about 10 minutes, and values ranging from about30 seconds to about 3 hours have log-likelihoods within 5 percent, with large c-values associated with large p-values. This range of c-values is reasonable if we assume that c represents detection limitations during the early part of an aftershock sequence (for example, Enescu and others, 2009). The spatial parameters q and d are more poorly constrained and trade off with each other, as shown in figure S3d. The maximum likelihood values are q=1.96 and d=0.79 km. Minimum values of q=1.8 and d=0.63 km have log-likelihoods within 5 percent of the maximum log-likelihood. However, the upper limits of both parameters are not bounded by the grid search, which considered values as high as d=10 km and q=5.4, which are unreasonably large values. The best-fit value of q is consistent with the previously observed range of q between 1.3 and 2.1 (Felzer and Brodsky, 2006; Felzer and Kilb, 2009; Marsan and Lengliné, 2010), and the best-fit value of d is on the order of the earthquake location
2011 (Census 2011) 2016 (BRG Target) 2020 (Estimated from BRG Targets) 2022 (BRG Target) 2026 (Estimated from census data) 2030 (Estimated from census data) 73,183 77,378 81,326 83,300 92,173 97,237 Cavan Town & Environs 10,205 11,600 12,400 12,800 16,253 17,765 County (minus Cavan Town & Environs) 62,978 65,778 68,926 70,500 75,920 79,472 The population estimates for the period of the development plan are in compliance with the Border Regional Guidelines targets. 2.1.2 Household Sizes and Numbers 1. The household size for , as identified in the 2011 census of population is 2.8, the estimated number of new households is calculated using this household size and the population estimates above.
Plan. This report shall include a review of the progress achieved in implementing the housing strategy and, where the report indicates that new or revised housing needs have been identified, the manager may recommend that the housing strategy be adjusted and the development plan varied accordingly. In addition the manager shall, where he considers that there has been a change in the housing market, or in the regulation made by the Minister under section 100 of the Planning and Development Act 2000, that significantly affects the housing strategy, give a report on the matter to the members of the authority and, where he considers it necessary, the manager may recommend that the housing strategy be adjusted and the development plan varied accordingly.
Pros and Cons of Options Identified by Working Group Appendix 10 Ref OPTION PROS CONS A No Change No impact on Mayoralty Does not appear to be public demand for change May be possible to address issues such as CIL on basis No start-up or consultation costs Change is happening anyway- eg CIL and financial challenges for public sector Management of CIL local proportion may be more cumbersome- delegations to Cabinet or officers required Perception remains of “democratic deficit” in Bath and of imbalance in
funded by the Council Tax payers of Bath & north East Somerset C Parishing of Bath (One single parish for all of Bath city wards) Parishing Bath would place the whole Bath & North East Somerset area on the same democratic footing Parish Councils are able to get things done quickly “on the ground” that are important to local people Would provide a clear route for the local proportion of Would require Community Governance Review. A larger Parish Council may not lever-in local community links Costs of Community Governance Review would incur costs (these are currently unknown and
Infrastructure Levy Would enable potential for local Neighbourhood Plans Some communities may feel they already have sufficient identify to form a Parish Review would incur costs (these are currently unknown and would depend on the approach taken, but a budget of £100,000 is envisaged) Establishing meaningful communities within Bath could be challenging Even smaller parishes would still have a diverse range of communities to serve Potential impact on Mayoralty of
ASSESSMENT FORM Education, Health and Care Needs Assessment Record Name of child/young person: Date of Date EHC needs assessment requested: Date EHC needs assessment agreed: All professionals, parent representatives and family members who have access to this document must adhere to the confidentiality and information sharing guidelines of the Data Protection Act 1998. All information is kept securely
Section I is only completed by the Local Authority if a Plan is agreed Section I: Placement (to be completed by the Local Authority) Education Placement (name and type of school/setting/Post 16 establishment) Section J: Personal Budget Has a personal budget been requested by the parents/carers person? Yes No If no, then this section of the plan need not be completed. If yes, this section will be completed if a Plan is agreed. Description of personal budget arrangements Budget (£s) Funding source* Education Outcomes to be achieved by the budget (explain how this budget will meet the outcomes including a description of the provision agreed. to numbered outcomes in section E – H2) Health Outcomes to be achieved by the budget (explain how this budget will meet the outcomes including a description of the provision agreed. Refer to numbered outcomes in section E – H2) Social Care Outcomes to be achieved by the budget (explain how this budget will meet the outcomes including a description of the provision agreed. Refer to numbered outcomes in section E – H2) Other including short breaks Outcomes to be achieved by the budget (explain how this budget will meet the outcomes including a description of the provision agreed. Refer to numbered outcomes in section E – H2) Total budget:
4.2.13 Assumed equivalent modulus of elasticity of conductor N/mm2 68,650 4.2.14 Assumed equivalent coefficient of linear expansion of conductor per ˚C 1.93 x 10-5 4.2.15 Maximum length of conductor on drum km 3 4.3 Conductor grease: 4.3.1 Type 4.3.2 Minimum drop-point temperature ˚C 120 4.3.3 Mass of grease per kilometre of conductor (all inner layers greased – Case 2 to IEC 61089) kg 4.4 Vibration damping system: 4.4.1 Type of system (vibration damper) type 4.4.2 Vibration damper 4.4.2.1 Type of vibration damper type Stockbridge 4.4.2.2 National / International standard IEC 61897 4.4.2.3 Number of wires in messenger cable No 19 4.4.2.4 Conductor diameter range mm 29.52 4.4.2.5 Mass of damper kg 4.4.2.6 Maximum span for: a. One vibration damper at each end of span m 370 b. Two vibration dampers at each end of span m 550 c. Three vibration dampers at each end of span m 700 4.4.2.7 Dimensions from clamp mouth to vibration damper attachment: a. damper mm 1040 b. Second damper when required mm 1930 c. damper when required mm 3270 5.0 Earth Conductor and fittings Aluminium Clad Steel GW 5.1 Complete earth conductor system
220 kV OVERHEAD LINE UNIT DATA Line conductor: 1 x Canary Required Offered 9.0 TOWER DESIGN PARTICULARS 9.1 Maximum tension per for purposes of tower design a. Suspension towers b. Tension towers c. Downleads per conductor bundle 9.2.1 Maximum tension per earth conductor for purpose of tower design and application: ACS Earthwire a. Suspension towers b. Tension towers c. Earth conductor downleads 9.2.2 Maximum tension per earth conductor for purpose of tower design and application: OPGW a. Suspension towers b. Tension towers c. OPGW downleads 9.3 Minimum clearance between live metal and tower steelwork:- a. with suspension insulator set swing, at 65º mm 500 b. with suspension insulator set swing, 0 - 10º mm 2150 c. with suspension insulator set swing 10 - 35º mm 1500 9.4 Minimum Clearance to steelwork on which a man may stand for live line maintenance (crossarm floor) m 3.9 9.5 Downleads – minimum clearances: phase to phase clearance in still air mm 3500 to phase clearance under conditions of maximum (opposing) swing and sag mm 2650 9.6 Earth conductor suspension clamps, unobstructed transverse swing angle from vertical degrees 0 – 50 9.7 Earth conductor maximum shielding angle from vertical at tower attachment point over outer line conductors degrees 3 9.8 Maximum ratio of unsupported length of steel compression member to their least radius of gyration: a. Main members 120 b. Stressed bracings 200 c. Unstressed bracings 250 d. Tension only members, detailed with draw 500 9.9 Maximum ultimate stresses, for checking tower designs not subjected to test (unless otherwise approved):- 9.9.1 Mild Steel:
Appendix 14 Legal/Illegal Questions SUBJECT MAY ASK MAY NOT ASK NAME Current legal name. If applicant has worked another name IF needed to verify work or education records. The original name of an applicant whose name has been changed or the national origin of an applicant’s name. SEX Nothing unless the purpose is for reporting EEO or affirmative Action reporting, then, data must be collected on a separate form. Anything, unless sex is a bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ). AGE Are you over the age of 18? (Proof of age can be requested for insurance purpose after employed) When applicant graduated from high school, college, etc. ADDRESS Place and length of current address. How long have you lived in the U.S.? What foreign addresses have you had? BIRTHPLACE Nothing About applicant, parents, spouse, grandparents, or other relatives. CITIZENSHIP Do you have the necessary documents authorizing you to work in the U.S? Of what country are you a citizen? MARITAL STATUS Nothing Married? Single? Engaged? Widowed? Do you prefer Miss., Mrs., or Ms.? SEXUAL ORIENTATION Nothing Heterosexual? Homosexual?
a. with suspension insulator set swing, at 65º mm 1100 b. with suspension insulator set 0 - 10º mm 3100 c. with suspension insulator set swing 10 - 35º mm 1800 9.3 Minimum clearance to steelwork on which a man may stand for live line maintenance (cross arm floor) m 5.0 9.4 Downleads – minimum clearances: to phase clearance in still air mm 4900 phase to phase clearance under conditions of maximum (opposing) swing and sag mm 3700 9.5 Earth conductor suspension clamps, unobstructed transverse swing angle from vertical degrees 0 – 50 9.6 Earth conductor maximum shielding angle from vertical at tower attachment point over outer line conductors degrees 17 9.7 Maximum ratio of unsupported length of steel compression member to their least radius of gyration: a. Main members 120 b. Stressed bracings 200 c. Unstressed bracings 250 d. Tension only members, detailed with draw 500 9.8 Maximum ultimate stresses, for checking tower designs not subjected to test (unless otherwise approved):- 9.8.1 Mild Steel: a. Compression members, Tenderer to indicate his design assumptions ASCE 10-97 b. Tension members (elastic N/mm2 220 c. Shear on bolts Bolt Grade 5.6 N/mm2 d. Material Bearing N/mm2 9.8.2 High Yield Steel: a. Compression members, Tenderer to indicate his design assumptions ASCE 10-97 b. Tension members (elastic limit) N/mm2 325 c. Shear on bolts Bolt Grade 8.8 N/mm2 d. Material Bearing N/mm2
ROTARY CLUB OF GRANDE PRAIRIE ROTARY SERVICE SCHOLARSHIPS APPLICATION FORM Deadline: Determined by your School The Rotary Club of Grande Prairie awards program has been established to encourage and reward academic excellence in all areas of study and provide financial assistance for students who demonstrate the core values of Rotary. The awards program seeks to recognize achievement, reward good character, community involvement and leadership, as well as encourage continued educational pursuits. Applicants must be in Grade 12 in the current school year. All awards valued at $2000. *Please check the appropriate box. School Location Awards Available Special Criteria Beaverlodge Regional High School Beaverlodge 1 Attending any Post-Secondary Institution in the year immediately following graduation Bridge Network (Outreach School) Grande Prairie 1 Attending any Post-Secondary Institution in the year immediately following graduation Charles Spencer High School Grande Prairie 1 Attending any Post-Secondary Institution in the year immediately following graduation Grande Prairie Composite High School Grande Prairie 5 One Award – Attending FT at GPRC Two Awards – Attending FT at any post-secondary institution One Award – Attending as a FT student at a Technical School One Award – Attending as a FT student in Fine Arts Peace Wapiti Academy Grande Prairie 2 Attending any Post-Secondary Institution in the year immediately following graduation Sexsmith Secondary High School Sexsmith 1 Attending any Post-Secondary Institution in the year immediately following graduation St. John Bosco Catholic School (Outreach School) Grande Prairie 1 Attending any Post-Secondary Institution in the year immediately following graduation St. Joseph Catholic High School Grande Prairie 3 Attending any Post-Secondary Institution in the year immediately following graduation St. Mary’s Catholic School Sexsmith 1 Attending any Post-Secondary Institution in the year immediately following graduation
Appendix 17 - FSM Dealer Application Completing this application This form must be completed for an application for designation as an FSM Dealer. Please read and follow all instructions. If you need assistance with your application, please contact NZX Participant Compliance on or +64 4 498 2279. All information provided to NZX in relation to this application will be kept confidential, except to the extent that disclosure of any or all of the information provided is necessary for the exercise of NZX’s regulatory functions, or as required by law. NZX reserves the right to decline an application even if it meets the prescribed minimum criteria. Completed application forms (together with any supporting information) should be emailed to or uploaded to the NZX Participant reporting platform. Checklist Please ensure that the following documentation and information has been provided: Application form has been completed and the undertaking signed by the Applicant Undertaking has been signed by the Market Participant’s Managing Principal Evidence of the Applicant’s qualifications and professional memberships Applicant’s CV outlining employment history and experience Details of any adverse or potentially adverse matters in relation to the Applicant which have been brought to the attention of any relevant regulatory authorities during the last 6 years Any relevant information in relation to this application Applicant Details
SCHOOL ACTIVITIES Termly update Termly Update Termly Update VISITORS TO SCHOOL Termly update against who, why and when Termly update against who, why and when Termly update against who, why and when LIAISON Include such things as: - Liaison with community groups - Other schools - Local primary / comprehensive school / s - Head teacher networks … incl. LLAN - Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) PARENT/ COMMUNITY LINKS - Parents in school … helpers … learners - PTA … activities … pupil helpers etc
Appendix 18 SAM 99 Checklist (Test Run & Final) Instructions: It is highly recommended that each campus complete this checklist in the course of preparing and transmitting its SAM 99 files, both the test and the final file, to the SCO. Errors are regularly identified by the SCO that cause processing delays and requests for resubmissions. To eliminate the possibility of resubmissions, all the elements on this checklist need to be checked and the accuracy and completeness of the submission verified. The completed checklist should be retained in your year-end files as documentation of the verification steps performed. The steps in each section of the checklist should be checked off as they are verified; if the step is not applicable for your campus, enter NA in the column provided. Test Submission Date completed: ________________ For proper file transmission to SCO server: File name is in the following format: FISCAL.DMMDDYYA.AGYACR (e.g., “FISCAL.D072111A.AGYACR”, for a file that was transmitted on July 21, 2011). The date within the file name, MMDDYY, is the same as the date on which the file will be transmitted to SCO. Correct transfer mode* is used. If software has been changed/upgraded prior to file submission, please consult the SAM99 Transmission FTP guide in section 7 of Chapter 5 in the CSU Legal Accounting and Reporting Manual. File submitted prior to 2 p.m. Email notification sent to the SCO personnel listed in the CSU Legal Accounting and Reporting Manual, Chapter 5 Section 4.1.2; “TEST” & Agency No. are on email subject header (i.e., TEST – SAM 99 Submission for Agency XXXX) Email to include items as listed in Section 4.1.2. If the file is being resubmitted and there has been a previous submission within the same day, SCO approval has been obtained to transmit each resubmission. For proper reporting of accruals: Downloaded SCO PY Accrual Summary Report for prior year accrual reversals. Confirmed downloaded data is the correct version by comparing the data to the current year report posted at the SCO website: File is submitted as of a “closed” period.
If you have any additional information or comments relating to this outbreak please attach to this report. Food/water sampling All samples collected during an outbreak investigation are to be submitted to MDU unless otherwise advised by CDPC. Description of food/water item sampled Date collected Collected from: (e.g. from cases home, from facility, from restaurant etc.) – please give details Is this leftover food from event/incident? Is this food from the same batch as the food implicated? Is this food an ingredient from the implicated food? Is this a freshly made of food? Example: hommus dip – whole of leftover remaining was sampled in its original container “Yummy Dip – 500g UBD 01/02/2009” 1/1/2009 cases home: Joe Bloggs yes – family ate half and kept the rest in the fridge yes – an uneaten portion of the same batch no no
The Public Sector Equality Duty comprises a general duty which is supported by specific duties. The general duty requires public bodies to have due regard to the need to: Eliminate discrimination, harassment and victimisation; Advance equality of opportunity between people who share a Protected Characteristic and those who do not; and Foster good relations between people who share a Protected Characteristic and those who do not. Human Rights Act 1998 are basic human rights set out in the Human Rights Act 1998. As a health care provider organisation, we strongly value these as everyone must have equal access to their human rights. Therefore, we will ensure that we consider opportunities to promote and protect people’s relevant human rights in all that we do. We will also ensure that people – our services users, their carers and our employees – are aware of their human rights and the legislation and how they can use it to help them address discrimination and unfairness. A focus on human rights and key values like fairness and respect underpin The DCHS Way. The Act sets out the fundamental rights and freedoms that individuals in the UK can expect. They include: the right to life freedom from torture and inhuman or degrading treatment the right to liberty and security freedom from slavery and forced labour the right to a fair no punishment without law respect for private and family life, home and correspondence freedom of thought, belief and religion freedom of expression freedom of assembly and association the right to marry and start a family protection from discrimination in respect of these rights and freedoms the right to peaceful enjoyment of property the right to education the right to participate in free elections
8. Main consultation response themes Table 1: Main themes of responses to open consultation questions, ranked by frequency. Theme of comments Number of positive comments Number of negative comments Most popular comments ranked Economic Impact 17 1 1st Location of Proposed Site 6 2 2nd Co-location of Services 4 3 3rd Accessibility of Proposed Site 1 3 4th Theme 1 – Economic Impact Example Comments
Key Function No Tasks 1 2 3 4 Premises 56 Buildings insurance – advice from LA, diocese or trustees where appropriate 57 Strategy (including budgeting for repairs etc) 58 To ensure health and safety issues are met 59 To set a charging and remissions policy * X X School Organisation 60 Proposal to alter or discontinue voluntary, foundation or foundation special school * X X 61 To set the times of school sessions and the dates of school terms and holidays (VA and foundation schools) * X X 62 To draw up instrument of government and any amendments thereafter * X X 63 To publish proposals to change category of school * X X Information For Parents 64 To hold a meeting with parents (if petitioned) X X 65 Annual Parents’ Report – to approve and distribute X X 66 To provide information to be published by governing bodies (approval of the school prospectus) * X X 67 To ensure provision of free school meals to those pupils meeting criteria X 68 Adoption and review of home-school agreements X X ACTION SHEET Decision Level Key Function No Tasks 1 2 3 4 GB Procedures 69 To appoint (and remove) the chair and vice-chair of a permanent or a temporary governing body * X X X 70 To appoint and dismiss the clerk to the governors X X X
Area Land Use Engineer: The local land use staff under the direction of the Area Land Use Engineer shall support all underground VDOT utility owners (Regional Operations, other VDOT Divisions, and VDOT offices) in administering and enforcing the requirements the Land Use Permit Regulations, including, but not limited to, compliance with VDOT notification process for underground VDOT utility locates, requiring repair of damaged underground VDOT utilities by excavators, and facilitating, to the extent possible within established funding allocations, reimbursement to Regional Operations for expenditures associated with administering the underground utility marking process. NOTES A tutorial on customer use of the Northern Virginia District’s Utility Marking System is available at The VDOT Web Services Utility Marking System, used by Northern Virginia District and Northern Regional Operations Office, may be accessed at http://www.vdotutilitymarking.virginia.gov/Account/Login.aspx?ReturnUrl=%2f REFERENCES Information on the Land Use Permit Regulations is available on VDOT’s external website at .
Appendix B List of Responsible Authorities Licensing Authority Guildford Borough Council Licensing Team Millmead House Millmead Guildford Surrey GU2 4BB Gambling Commission Gambling Commission Victoria Square House Victoria Square Birmingham B2 4BP Chief Officer for Police Surrey Police The Licensing Unit PO Box 101 Guildford Surrey GU1 9PE Fire and Rescue Authority Surrey Fire and Rescue Service Fire Station Guildford Road Farnham Surrey GU9 9QB Planning Authority Guildford Borough Council Planning Services Millmead House Millmead Guildford Surrey GU2 4BB Environmental Health Authority Guildford Borough Council Environmental Health Team Millmead Millmead Guildford Surrey GU2 4BB Child Protection Authority Surrey County Council Safeguarding Children Unit Quadrant 35 Guildford Road Woking Surrey GU22 7QQ HM Revenue and Customs HM Revenue and Customs National Registration Unit Portcullis House 21 Street Glasgow G2 4PZ Appendix C List of Consultees
2.4 Consider option to take up the extension or call tenders for the Green waste bin service. August 2013 Complete The current contract for this service commenced 1 January 2015. Landfill sites No. Action Time Complete Comment 3.1 Plan for the cessation of environmental monitoring at Nar Nar Goon landfill dependent upon EPA requirements. Dec 2012 Complete A project is underway to implement new landfill monitoring guidelines within the monitoring regime, and pending results, an ongoing monitoring plan will be developed. It is likely to result in ongoing monitoring for many years, as per EPA guidelines. 3.2 and remove all concrete from Nar Nar Goon landfill Dec 2011 Ongoing All of the concrete has been crushed at the site, and is currently being reused within road base works. 3.3 Prepare a strategy for the future use of the Nar Nar Goon landfill. Dec 2014 Ongoing This will be considered as part of the project underway to implement new landfill monitoring guidelines within the monitoring regime, and production of an ongoing maintenance plan for the site. Disposal No. Action Time Complete Comment 4.1 Explore MWMG metro wide landfill disposal contract rather than calling tenders. April 2011 Complete Since 2010, Council has utilised the Regional Landfill Services contract, as managed by the MWRRG, which has provided a cost effective and secure arrangement. This contract is in place until April 2021. 4.2 Utilise MWMG “Short term green organics processing contract” should the Drovers Place facility not be able to receive green waste at any time during the contract rather than sending material to landfill. 2010 – ongoing Complete Council currently utilises MWRRGs short term green organics processing contract. New regional organic waste facility contracts have been entered into to secure long term organic waste processing from mid 2017.
Defence Prosecution Witness Defendant Take notes on a number of cases your observed in court Case Gender of defendant Estimated age of defendant Type of Offence / Case Was the defendant Represented (yes/no)? What was the case about? Was the defendant convicted? If so, what sanction was 1 2 3 4 5 Comment on your impressions of the courtroom. You should comment on the following points: The courtroom atmosphere—was it formal or informal? The physical facilities—consider heating, cooling, lighting, seating and acoustics The proceedings—such as the number of cases heard and the speed at which the cases were heard Whether it appeared to be efficient. Did it appear to be fair?
52. SA-5 Information System Documentation Administrator documentation exists for the information system, all system components, and all system services. The documentation describes the secure configuration, installation, and operation. Inherited Partially-Inherited 53. SC-20 Secure Name /Address Resolution Service (Authoritative Source) The system or supporting infrastructure provides additional validation of the authoritative name resolution data returned by the system in response to external name/ address resolution, such as Domain Name System Security Extensions (DNSSEC). Inherited Partially-Inherited 54. SC-21 Secure Name /Address Resolution Service (Recursive or Caching Resolver) The system or supporting infrastructure performs additional validation of name/address resolution responses received from authoritative sources, such as DNSSEC. Inherited Partially-Inherited 55. SC-22 Architecture and Provisioning for Name/ Address Resolution Service Collectively, the name/address resolution service is fault-tolerant and appropriately works within the fault-tolerant aspects of the system. Inherited Partially-Inherited 56. SC-39 Process Isolation The system maintains a separate execution domain for each executing process and customer instance. Inherited Partially-Inherited 57. SI-5 Security Alerts, Advisories, and Directives System administrators or incident response staff receive security alerts from all vendors represented within the system, as well as from DHS US CERT. Our incident response staff create and disseminate security alerts and advisories to system administrators, appropriate staff, and users of the system. Inherited Partially-Inherited