10 points – The project directly results in a sustainable long-term reduction in the amount of waste being generated for disposal in Missouri. 5 points – The project results in a sustainable intermediate-term reduction in the amount of waste being generated for disposal in Missouri. 1 point – The project results in a one-time reduction in the amount of waste being generated for disposal in Missouri. __________ 4. Targeted Materials List: 7 points – The project reduces or recycles material(s) listed 1 through 4 on the District’s Targeted Materials List. 5 points – The project supports reduction or recycling of Electronic Waste in a single county. 3 points – The project supports reduction or recycling of Yard Waste in a single county. NOTE: Materials ranked from Highest (1) to Lowest (6) are: 1. Fiber (paper, cardboard, etc.) 2. Plastics 3. Metal (including containers and other metals) 4. 5. Electronic Waste 6. Yard Waste Economic Feasibility __________ 1. Private, Not-for-Profits and Public Entities Committed Financing: 10 points – All financing for the project is committed and documented. 6 points – Sufficient financing for the project is likely, but not yet committed. 1 – The likelihood of the project obtaining sufficient financing is questionable. __________ 2. Applicant’s Contribution: 10 points – Project financing includes over 50% local match of the total project costs. 5 points – Project financing includes over 33% match of the total project costs. 3 points – Project financing includes 25% local match of the total project cost. __________ 3. Project Site Identification: 5 points – The applicant currently owns or leases the site for the proposed project. 3 points – The applicant has identified a site for the project but cannot demonstrate commitment for obtaining it for the specified use. 0 points – The applicant does not identify a site. Financial Consideration __________ 1. Budget: 5 points – The project budget is well thought out and reasonable. 3 points – The project budget contains some questionable items. 1 point – The project budget is incomplete, confusing or problematic.
__________ TOTAL POINTS Miscellaneous Considerations (“Extra Credit” and “Tiebreakers”) __________ Market Viability: 9 points – Includes documented commitments from end-markets for all of the end-product. 5 points – Includes documented commitments from end-markets for 50% of the end-product. 3 points – Includes documented commitments from end-markets for less than 50% of the end-product. 0 points – Does not include targeted end-markets for the end-product. _________ Marketing Strategy: 5 points – The project has a strong marketing strategy. 3 points – The project has an acceptable marketing strategy. 1 point – The marketing strategy for the project is questionable. 0 points – The project has no marketing strategy included. __________ Partnerships 5 points – The project results in the development of a public/private cooperative partnership. 3 points – The project may result in the development of a public/private cooperative partnership. 0 points – The project does not result in the development of a public/private cooperative partnership. __________ Supply of Recovered Material(s): 5 points – The applicant provides documentation that sufficient supply of recovered materials(s) has been secured for the project or that revered material(s) are not needed. 3 points – The applicant has identified an adequate supply of recovered material(s) for the project. 1 point – Adequate supply of recovered material(s) for the proposal are questionable. __________ TOTAL “Extra Credit” Name of Reviewer Signed:__________________________________________ Date: ____________________________________________
establishing additional requirements to obtain prior approvals from SWMP and/or the District, where appropriate. If the SWMP declares a District or District Subgrantee to be high risk and prior to imposing special conditions or restrictions, the SWMP will notify the District or District Subgrantee as early as possible, in writing, of: the nature of the special conditions/restrictions; the reason(s) for imposing the special conditions/restrictions; the corrective actions that must be to abate the problems that gave rise to the special conditions/ restrictions and the time allowed for completing such corrective actions; and the method of requesting reconsideration of the special conditions/restrictions imposed. 11. In consideration for the ability to utilize SWMF monies, the District and the District Subgrantee agree to comply with all applicable terms and conditions of the Financial Assistance Agreement (FAA) and any documents incorporated therein, including these General Terms and Conditions. Districts must incorporate the General Terms and Conditions into the District’s Subgrantee FAAs and any documents incorporated therein and either provide copies or make copies available to the District’s Subgrantees. Project and Budget Periods District Operations: The District’s grant and budget period shall cover up to a one (1) year time period, unless otherwise approved by the SWMP. Plan Implementation and District Subgrantee Projects: Districts are to assign project and budget periods for district subgrants to allow for up to a two (2) year time period for project completion. A maximum of one (1) six (6)-month extension may be allowed beyond the two (2) year completion period when approved by the District’s Executive Board. All project and budget period extensions must be documented in executive board meeting minutes with a copy of the extension and executive board meeting minutes provided to SWMP. Any extension of the project or budget periods beyond two (2) years and six (6) months must have prior approval of the District’s Executive Board and the SWMP. Method of Payments and Disbursements The District must be in compliance with all reporting requirements to receive disbursements. Disbursements from SWMP to the District.