planned but including these National Security requirements so. The second recommendation deals more specifically with analyzing, have the NOS staff analyze and take a closer look at the coastal barge traffic and operations that deal with resupply of coastal communities and also resupply of the North Slope and how does that fit in to this picture of traffic in the US Maritime Arctic. And the third one is we have offshore leases and what are the requirements from DOI and the requirements of the commercial world both inside and outside the lease sites. And I am pretty certain that those requirements are not clear to anyone so our recommendations are these three that deal with three different marine uses that its unclear to us as a recommending to NOAA with some expertise here that its not clear that those three requirements have been analyzed enough. MEMBER MILLER: Since youre talking
have but we didnt actually specify, its just the relationship of the organizations and their contribution and an integrated whole government approach where we dont have a lot of data and we know they have some. I know personally they have some so and you do to, so two of us on the committee know, and I think Andy does, enough of us know that they have data and the question is how are they going to share it with us all for this remote and challenging area where we dont have a lot of information so we can massage that recommendation if youd like slightly to say it a bit harder on that. A consensus on those three I guess. CHAIR PERKINS: Yes, I think, its my opinion, Dr. Miller, that what youre suggesting might fit better under 3A, the alternative strategies for Arctic coverage, you know. And I think that maybe the concise way to state that is that we recommend full release of all bathymetric data collected by other agencies
something that we have to necessarily officially vote on but perhaps just get consensus. There are four parts to it: recommendation letter, meeting notes and summary, working groups and planning. I believe everyone, we have discussed it earlier in administrative meetings with one minor addition that the number and missions of working groups will be reviewed and modified as necessary. Is there any discussion or comments and can we get consensus that as of this HSRP meeting these will be our guidelines as to standard operating procedures? Comments? MEMBER KUDRNA: Sounds good. And I think we had informal discussion of the ability to amend working committees later on. So I think it looks fine to me. MEMBER MILLER: Okay. Thank you. All right. Just shall we say Aye that were agreed that these will be our standard operating procedures?
to submit their bathymetric data thats collected in pursuit of the bid or the production. And I prepared those very incomplete sentences because I had a little bit of time, but hearing the last bit of conversation today as for an audience for your engagement documents -- your one pagers as youve called them - consider organizations like mine -- ASCE, Hydrographic Society of America, et cetera. We participate with MAPPS, and in fact NSPS does annually in the fall to engage our members of Congress and Senate. Indeed, theres four of the six points, and we select two or three that are pertinent to that state or that Congressmans interest, et cetera. And on the flip side, I like the idea that I heard of keeping it simple, very sparse data on the front side, but consider - this might take a little more creativity -- but consider on the flip side to have a did you know aspect. Did you know that theres - and then fill in the
ellipsoid can be accomplished and the positioning aspect of that in referencing that to shore stations, CORS Network etc. So it is a work in progress and I think that is something that we should look forward to talking more about with the panel once we have more definitive ways of how were going to progress with this. Not just in the northern latitudes but in multiple places and how were going to try to address that, thank you. RADM GLANG: More CORS stations will definitely help. MS. BLACKWELL: This is an aside, Juliana Blackwell again. The question came up, I dont know if it was during the official session or not about the CORS in Alaska and a couple of things to note -- and NOAA does not own any of those CORS stations. There are a number of them up there, you can go to our CORS webpage and see where they are currently located. One thing to point out that wasnt
background, Navy, whatever. At least some, because that dimension is what were talking about, I think, that many other bureaucrats with their great function and dedication in the government, dont have. I mean, were talking about the roots of this organization, and you have to understand it better by being a mariner, biased completely, but I think it is an issue here. Because when I talked to Brown, I mean hes thinking Coast Guard cutters, charts, navigating in waters where there arent charts, and that kind of thing. Thats his perspective. Thats where he learned it all. Just an observation, really. MEMBER ATKINSON: I agree with you, but then I disagree a little bit too, because there are non-navigational uses of stuff. We need a good mix. CHAIR PERKINS: You know, its a good comment, and me sitting where Im sitting at this table, being a non-mariner, I learned a lot last
absolutely survey the main channels that well expect to be using. So, I mean I understand all that. MEMBER BRIGHAM: The issue is, do we want to show numbers like point zero five percent to give that to Senator Murkowski. We dont want to do that, I dont think. CHAIR PERKINS: Yes, so Lawsons point is we dont want to give the Senator Murkowski, for instance, a value like point zero five percent, which is why I use the term less than one percent of the U.S. arctic. I think the number is actually point zero seven, based on our calculations from last year. DR. CALLENDER: So, it might be useful for us to actually pitch a briefing to the Senator and go and walk through to what the reality is of what we actually believe we do need a mapping of what those priorities look like. I think that would probably be a good idea.