zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
The space between two neurons is called a ________________ and the chemical that fills that space is called a _____________________. What are the 5 sections of the Brain? What are the main functions of the Brain? Name the three main components of the Brain and the function of each. What is the purpose of the grooves (GYRI) and fissures (SULCUS) of the Cerebrum? What are some of the differences between the left and right side of the Brain? What is the function of the Frontal Lobe, Parietal Lobe, Temporal Lobe, and the Occipital Lobe of the Brain? What is the major function of the Cerebellum?
Governance Council Committee Meetings Minutes ADA Committee Date of Minutes Posting: Meeting Date: 2/19/14 Meeting Start Time: 2:00pm Meeting Actual Start Time: 2:05pm Meeting Location: Room 0028, Knight Campus Meeting Secretary : Daphne Gilles Member Attendance Committee Member Name Title Present Notes Daphne Gilles Director, Disability Services for Students Office Y Julie Galleshaw Associate Professor, Dental Health Programs Y Michael Cunningham Dean of Students Y Sheri Norton Director, Human Resources Y slnorton@ccri.edu Tracy Karasinski Dean, Opportunity and Outreach Y David Snow Associate Director, Physical Plant Y Rob Giovino Associate Director, Admissions Y Lisa Mallozzi Director, Advising and Counseling Y lmallozzi@ccri.edu Jackie Hogan Administrative Assistant, President’s Office & Marketing/Communications N Jhogan1@ccri.edu Maureen McGarry Dean, Health & Rehabilitative Sciences Y mmcgarry@ccr.edu Robin Donnelly Coordinator, Human Resources N Michael Gonzalez Senior Teller, Bursar’s Office N Sandra Sneesby Assistant Professor, Computer Studies N Dawn Lewis Director of User Support Y dalewis@ccri.edu Guests in Attendance
as to what effects these electromagnetic transmissions could have on mitochondria and the central nervous system. Previous Research: For the sake of simplification, previous research into this subject shall be categorized into one of three categories; The first is research into chemiluminescence or more specifically research into chemiluminescence originating from mitochondria. The second is research into the physiological effects of radiating electromagnetic energy onto mitochondria. The third is research into the propagation of electromagnetic radiation throughout cellular structures. Chemiluminescent reactions can be broken down into three categories. The first category includes “chemical reactions using synthetic compounds and usually involving a highly oxidized species such as a peroxide” (1) These are commonly termed chemiluminescent reactions. Another type are “light-emitting reactions arising from a living organism, such as the firefly or jellyfish” (1). These are commonly termed biochemiluminescent reactions. The third category are “light-emitting reactions which take place by the use of electrical current” and are designated electrochemiluminescent reactions (1). Under these classifications, the chemiluminescence which occurs in mitochondria during cellular respiration falls into the second category of biochemiluminescence, however, mitochondrial bioluminescence is different than what most people think of bioluminescence, in the fact that mitochondrial bioluminescence is categorized as “ultra-weak” (13) do to the extremely low intensity of the radiated light. It has been speculated, however, that the chemiluminescence/bioluminescence that is
Co-organized interstate, multi-site visit to a neighboring Freedom School. Youth Empowerment Services, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 2002-2004 Program Coordinator Worked with a team of faculty, researchers, college and high school students at Temple University to design and implement action-oriented community projects for Youth VOICES. Conducted student workshops and instructor training. Served on the product development and program evaluation teams assisting with brand development and program quality. Accomplishments: Defined core components of Youth VOICES program. Developed standard modules for Youth VOICES program. Temple University Russell Conwell Educational Services Center Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 2001-2002 ACT-SO Coordinator Worked with Temple University and local NAACP to coordinate the annual ACT-SO competition. Conducted web-based enrichment workshops for participants and parents, coordinated and planned competition day logistics, wrote annual program reports, developed database of all participants. Met with sponsors, contacted area high schools to recruit students, and publicized competition at local high schools and organizations. Accomplishments: Established coordinators at high schools, which led to improved communication and recruitment. Created a database of participants backdated 3 years, resulting in more efficient tracking, mailing and report systems. Junior Achievement of Delaware Valley, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 2000-2001 Education Manager Worked with Drexel University Service Learning Office to train freshman class (1820 students) on Junior Achievement programs, helped to develop schematic for student placement in Philadelphia public schools, conducted presentations to school teachers. Accomplishments: Produced and developed Drexel Experience/Junior Achievement manual used to train facilitators and freshman class. Recruited four Philadelphia charter schools to participate in Junior Achievement, two with 100% student body participation. CONSULTATIONS: Pennsylvania Humanities Council (PHC), Philadelphia Pennsylvania 2014-2016 Research Consultant Research and review literature, write briefings on library partnerships and effective programs for socioeconomically and ethnic diverse teens, prepare a Pennsylvania statement of needs for out-of- school time youth programming, interview faculty experts about literature, literacy, and research supported strategies for youth serving humanities curriculum to support the pilot of the Teen Reading Lounge (TRL) Project for diverse youth. Solicit input from TRL stakeholders on suggested program revisions via in-person meetings, conference calls and online surveys. University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa 2013-2014 Child Protection in Emergencies (CPiE) Curriculum Writer
THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG WEEK 3: 23 – 27 OCTOBER 2017 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ADAMS J Matters will be called on the day and at the time allocated as indicated on the roll below. Counsel will be held to time estimates. As soon as a matter becomes settled, the parties agree to a postponement or the application will not proceed for whatever reason, electronic notification of same must be sent to and the matter may be called at 10H00 on the day allocated for hearing. All heads of argument, as they appear on the court file, must be forwarded electronically in MS Word format to . MONDAY, 23RD OCTOBER 2017 NO NAMES OF PARTIES CASE NUMBER ESTIMATED DURATION TIME OF HEARING HEADS B3 The General Church of the New Jerusalem & Others v Jacob Maseko & Others 24497/14 3 hours 10HOO App only B4 Orpen Brothers Properties One (Pty) Ltd & another v Agnes Govha & 45 others 25831/14 11H30 No heads B9 Score Supermarkets Trading Pty Ltd v Midnight Star Trading 447 CC 23039/15 1 hour 12H00 Both B10 Ndamage, Peti Richard v Nedbank Limited 29922/15 1 hour 14H00 Both TUESDAY, 24TH OCTOBER 2017 B18 Property Master (Pty) Ltd v Redefine Properties Ltd 36351/16 2 hours 10H00 Both
B26 Esthe Lungile Choma v James Reginald O’Shea & another 40883/16 45 min 10H30 2nd Resp only B28 Harbour Town Homeowners Association NPC v Michael Gordon Russel & another 40976/16 3 hours 11H30 App only B29 Lazelle Meyer vs Gerald Scholtz & 2 others 41319/16 45 min 12H00 B31 Forever Resorts SA (Pty) Ltd vs Manala Dingaan Phineas 68901/16 14H00 App only WEDNESDAY, 25TH OCTOBER 2017 B39 Standard Bank of SA v Zevoli Industrial supplies (Pty) Ltd 23779/16 10H00 B45 Timothy Mkhabela v Hermanus Bothma and 2 others 48410/2016 10H30 Both B48 Vema Construction CC v City of Tshwane Metro 37764/14 2 hours 11H30 Resp only B49 Sameer Abdullah Abbas v SA Veterinary Council and 2 others 9239/16 1 hour 12H00 Both
Revision History Date Version Description Author 1/2011 0.1 Compatible PC104 Setup Instructions Written Chris Shake 2/15/2011 0.2 Updated Configuration of RTAI 3.7 with Ubuntu 9.04 and Compatible PC104 setup Instructions Kelsey Saulnier 5/8/2012 1.0 Initial Draft Dr. Riccardo Bevilacqua 1/15/2013 2.0 Reorganized Draft Dave Guglielmo 3/19/2013 2.1 Edit: Reorganized Draft Kelsey Saulnier 11/20/2013 3.0 Beginning Again Kelsey Saulnier 12/1412015 3.1 Updates after system moved to UF Sanny Omar Table of Figures
Base Address The hardware address of the PC104 that the IR-104 Relay Board is on. For the 6DoF testbed this has been 0x240. E.g. 0x240 Controllers LQRY Solution Overview: Legacy. Lyapunov Controller A controller using the Lyapunov control method outlined in Kelsey Saulnier, David Perez, Grace Tilton, Daniele Gallardo, Chris Shake, Rosemary Huang, Riccardo Bevilacqua, "Operational Capabilities of a Six Degrees of Freedom Spacecraft Simulator", AIAA GNC Conference 2013, Boston, MA. (AIAA 2013-5253). Inputs x_current The current state of the controlled testbed. [position, rotation (quaterion 0123), velocity, angular velocity] x_desired Desired final state of the testbed. (this can be changed over time) [position, rotation (quaterion 0123), velocity, angular velocity] other An array containing [K1, K1, K1, K2, K2, K2, K3, K3, K3, K4, K4, K4, Position threshold, Angle threshold (deg), error mask (12x1), delta] (t) (goto) This block expects there is a goto block somewhere which has the time and is called “t” (enabled) (goto) This block expects there is a goto block somewhere which tells it when it is enabled. There is such a goto in the State Estimator block so if that block is being used you do not have to worry about this. Outputs U A (12x1) vector of 1s and 0s indicating the state the relays should be in to implement the control. (this output can be fed into the Relay Board block with the 8&9 and 11&12 values switched. output Value of the Lyapunov function. Often this is used for debugging output. error Current error as seen by the controller. This error is output after the thresholds are applied. (A_read) (from) Outputs A matrix of the Linear Reference Model as it is created from the “other” input K values. (thres_read) (from) Outputs the threshold values being used.
4. Chen, Keng. 1996. “Alternative Hedging Strategies for Rice-Wheat Trade in Asia,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Oklahoma State University. 3. Betts, Steven P. 1996. “Effects of Reducing Government Deficiency Payments on Marketing Strategies for Wheat,” M.S. Thesis, Oklahoma State University. 2. Olbert, Everett C. 1994. “Government Storage Programs and the Supply of and Demand for Storage: An Empirical Analysis for Hard Red Winter Wheat,” M.S. Thesis, Oklahoma State University. 1. Garrison, Carl O. 1993. “Grain Markets, Elevator Margins, and the Conservation Reserve Program,” M.S. Thesis, Oklahoma State University. Completed Graduate Student Reports Supervised 4. Prado, Baltazar. 2004. “An Economic Examination of Potential Electricity and Fertilizer Production in the Eucha-Spavinaw Watershed,” Oklahoma State University. 3. Gouveia-Sahad, Carlos. 1999. “Hedging Brazilian Corn and Soybeans Using U.S. Futures Exchanges,” Oklahoma State University. 2. Agah, Nimet. 1998. “The Effects of Fertilizer Subsidies on Wheat Production in Turkey,” 1998 Oklahoma State University. 1. Escobar, Dardo. 1993. “Analyzing the Effects of MERCOSUR Free Trade Agreement on Trade Among Argentina, Paraguay, Uruguay, and Brazil,” Oklahoma State University. Research Program Activities Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station Project #OKLO2720, “Economics of Integrated Pest Management for Stored Products and Food Processing Facilities,” Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station Project #OKLO2489, “Costs, Benefits, and Risks of Integrated Pest Management in Grain Storage and Food Processing Facilities,” 2002. Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station Project #OKLO02291, “Effects of Institutional Changes on Agricultural Markets for Food and Feed Grains and on Agricultural Firms,” 1996. Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station Project #OKLO2138, “Increasing Returns to Grain and Livestock Marketing,” 1990.
Adapter Plate Installation Guide Smart UF55 and Vivitek D88x projectors (D881ST, D882ST, D883ST, D884ST) Supplied Accessories Installation There are two sets of mounting positions, “A” and “B”. For most installations, use B position set. NO Diagrammatic Presentation Designation Quantity a Adapter Plate 1 b Installation Safety Pin 1 c Flat Head Phillip M04x-.7x16 3 d Spacer 3/8” OD, 1/4” L 3 e Pan Head Phillip M4-.7x10 1
ADAPTATIONS POLICY 2015 INTRODUCTION Adaptations make properties more accessible and usable for people with a medical condition or disability and thereby enable them to maximise their independence in their own home. Adapted properties help the Association to create stable, sustainable and inclusive communities. The Association is committed to carrying out adaptations to properties where these comply with the criteria set out in this policy and with that included in the Association’s other relevant policies and procedures, and guidance from the Scottish Government, Clackmannanshire Council Social Services, Fife Council Social Services and The Scottish Housing Regulator. OBJECTIVES The Association will aim to achieve the following when undertaking adaptations: Enhance the independence of the tenant Specify the work in line with professional advice from Occupational Therapist and consultants and Housing Services Complete the work efficiently and competently Maintain communication between the tenant, Occupational Therapist, contractor and consultant and within the Association Secure grant funding promptly, where eligible Maintain a record of the work that has been undertaken Maintain the adaptation Secure resources for maintenance of the adaptation ELIGIBILITY Adaptations to new and existing housing, which is owned and rented by the Association, are currently eligible for funding from the Scottish Government. Sharing owners and shared equity owners should be eligible for local authority improvement grants in the same way as other owner occupiers for adaptations to their properties. Owners will therefore be directed to the relevant council for assistance. . REFERRALS Referrals are received from the following sources: Self-referral Tenant’s General Practitioner (GP) Occupational Therapist (OT), who may be employed by a Health Board, Local Authority (LA) or other organisation such as an insurance company.
Social María Elena Ubeda UNICEF Nicaragua Nicaragua Patricia Velasco Fomento al Desarrollo Infantil (NGO) Bolivia Ofelina Vergara Hospital del Niño Panama Sian Williams CARICHILD Jamaica Facilitator and Workshop Organizers Fabio Manno Consultant (Facilitator) UK Chris Drasbek PAHO USA Janet Lennox Consultant for UNICEF TACRO Panama Maite Onochie UNICEF TACRO Panama
Preferred Inhaler Choices for Asthma in pictures Step 1 SABA Step 2 Low dose ICS Step 3 Low dose ICS + LABA Step 4 Medium dose ICS + LABA Step 5 High dose ICS +LABA METERED DOSE INHALERS: Salbutamol MDI 100mcg 2 puffs PRN Qvar CFC free MDI 50mcg 1-2 puffs bd Fostair aerosol inhaler 100/6 inhaler 1 puff BD Fostair aerosol inhaler 100/6 inhaler 2 puffs bd Flutiform aerosol inhaler 250/10 Inhaler 2 puffs bd DRY POWDER INHALERS: Salbutamol Easyhaler 100mcg 2 puffs prn Beclometasone Easyhaler 200mcg/dose 1 puff BD DuoResp Spiromax160/4.5 1 puff bd DuoResp Spiromax 320/9 1 puff bd Relvar Ellipta 184/22 1 puff od
Table 6.1: Overview of what New Zealand is currently doing to adapt to climate change assessed against the characteristics and attributes of effective adaptation system identified in Chapter 4 ATTRIBUTES PUBLIC SECTOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR PRIVATE SECTOR CIVIL SOCIETY Central Government Local Government (excluding infrastructure) Infrastructure providers Finance and insurance Health providers Primary sector Other business Iwi/Māori INFORMED They understand what’s happening They understand the implications of the changes and what this means for them ORGANISED They know what’s expected of them They have common goals They have a planned approach They have the tools they need DYNAMIC ACTION They are taking anticipatory action They are being flexible They are reducing risks by adapting ASSESSMENT: Maintain There is evidence that all descriptors of the attribute are in place More Work Required There is evidence that most descriptors of the attribute are in place Significant work required There is evidence that some descriptors of the attribute are in place Not present There is no evidence that any descriptor of the attribute is in place
References 1, 14 Capek J, Wymard-Tomlinson D. Effective communication at change of shift. Nursing Critical Care. 2013;8(1):22-24. 2, 19 Joint Commission Center for Transforming Healthcare. 2013. 2013. Retrieved from ____________Accessed October, 2014. 3, 6, 7, 9, 18, 28 Riesenberg L, Leitzsch J, Cunningham JM. Nursing Handoffs: A systematic review of the literature. American Journal of Nursing. 2010;110(4):24-34. 4 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Hospital survey on patient safety culture: 2009 comparative report. 2009. Accessed March 2013. 5 Holly C, Poletick EB. A systematic review on the transfer of information during nurse transitions in care. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2013;23:2387-2396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12365 8 De Vries. Effect of a comprehensive surgical safety system on patient outcomes. New England Journal of Medicine. 2010;363(20):928-37. 10, 11 Stevens JD. Implementing standardized reporting and safety checklists: Developing processes to create a culture of safety. American Journal of Nursing. 2011;111(5):48-53. 12, 13 Younan LA, Fralic MF. Using “best-fit” interventions to improve the nursing intershift handoff process at a medical center in Lebanon. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. 2013;39:460-467.
infrequently (once every quarter), how will this work? What if important feedback should be given in between meetings? through the Dean’s Circular The Dean’s Circular allows room for objection by anyone on campus Meetings are mandated by circumstance The same should hold for the UOTT Q: Who sits on the Faculty Board? Membership is extensive. Prof. Ntusi will provide a list Feedback from Faculty and Constituencies Prelude: There is great support and optimism from the different constituents on campus about the Ad Hoc Task Team as it displays a genuine effort by the Dean Team and Faculty leadership to deal with student demands timeously and effectively Comment Response/Discussion Ensure all undergraduate student constituencies are represented in Selection Task Team All student constituencies are believed to be represented at the moment Any constituencies not represented will be allowed to present themselves through the circulation of the minutes Conclusion Enquire about Decolonize FHS and whether they would like representation Selection Task Team should be expanded to include class representatives Important as this allows the inclusion of students who are not affiliated with any particular constituency 2 representatives will be chosen from among the MBChB and Health and Rehabilitation class representatives, respectively It is important that students not to be forced onto the Selection Task Team Selection and Nomination of Undergraduate Oversight Task Team did not deal in-depth with selections and nominations This was adequately dealt with and outlined in the document provided, so there will be no need to circulate a different document The same system was used in 2016 with broad acceptance Each constituency to nominate a member and submit these nominations with a motivation as to why the nominee is qualified The voting process will be one vote per person Process of reporting and providing outcomes to working groups are not yet established This was thought to be beyond the scope of the Ad Hoc Task Team and would be left for the UOTT to deal with How will nominations be dealt with and who will review the nominations? Recommendation of an external and independent person to be brought in The nominations will be dealt with and reviewed by the Selection Task Team Recommendation was accepted The Selection Task Team circulating the The Selection Task Team will be composed
Adaptive Schools Trainer’s Self-Reflecting Conversation Template As part of the requirement to become an Adaptive Schools trainer, you will be taping yourself presenting the Adaptive Schools content (Agency Trainer) or facilitating a group (Training Associate). After viewing the tape, you will complete the Adaptive Schools Presentation Skills Self-Assessment Rubric (Agency Trainer) or the Facilitation Skills Self-Assessment Rubric (Training Associate) and write a reflective paper, following the Cognitive CoachingSM Reflecting Conversation Map below. The structure below is provided to guide your written reflection; please feel free to add other thinking to your written reflection. How am I feeling about my video? or What do I think of my video? and What makes me feel/think that way? Choose from the following and/or add those of your own: What are some of the things I did that supported thinking? How did I make decisions about what questions to ask? What was my awareness of the group’s energy sources? How did the facilitation go compared to how I thought it would? What I am learning that I want to focus on for my growth in the Adaptive Schools work? When might I have an opportunity to apply that learning? How has this reflection supported my thinking about my growth as an Adaptive Schools trainer?
3. A Possible Path for a Student The example below illustrates how two different students can progress through the adaptive roadmap for a 60 item general test. The 60 item general test presents subtests of 3 items. A student will move up to the next level of difficulty if they answer two or more questions correctly. If they answer less than two questions correctly, they will move down to an easier subtest. In the example shown below, Student-1 (highlighted in red) and Student-2 (highlighted in blue) both start at 6. Student-1 finishes at 6L and Student-2 finishes at 7L. It is clear from the diagram that Student-1 is presented with questions from generally lower difficulty level ranges than Student-2. The paths illustrated below were determined by the number of questions each student answered correctly within each subtest (see Table 1). Level 7 General Mathematics 3 Student - 1 6 Student - 2 6 6L 7L 9 5 6 7 12 5L 6L 7L 8L 15 4 5 6 7 8 18 4L 5L 6L 7L 8L 9L 21 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 24 3L 4L 5L 6L 7L 8L 9L 10L 27 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 30 2L 3L 4L 5L 6L 7L 8L 9L 10L 10A 33 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 36 2L 3L 4L 5L 6L 7L 8L 9L 10L 10A 39 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 42 2L 3L 4L 5L 6L 7L 8L 9L 10L 10A 45 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 48 2L 3L 4L 5L 6L 7L 8L 9L 10L 10A 51 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 54 2L 3L 4L 5L 6L 7L 8L 9L 10L 10A 57 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 60 2L 3L 4L 5L 6L 7L 8L 9L 10L 10A Figure 3 Possible Pathways for Level 7 - 60 Item General Adaptive Test
8. Student Tracking Report Date From: Any Date To: 12 Jan 2017 (Year level: All, Home Group: All, LBOTE: All, ATSI: All) Number of Student: 6 Number of Test Results: 6 Note that the ‘Raw Score Mark’ is not displayed for an adaptive test. Raw Scores are not relevant in adaptive tests because students with the same raw score may be working at different Victorian Curriculum levels and will receive different Standard Score results. See Section 4 of this document. Student ID Student Name Test ID Test Description Testing date Total Mark Possible Raw Score Mark Standard Score Satisfactory/Non Satisfactory Indicator Student100 Newman Paul 4002 Mathematics General 4 11/01/2017 60 Above 10.9 Student101 Nolte Nick 4002 Mathematics General 4 11/01/2017 60 4.2 Student102 Norton Edward 4002 Mathematics General 4 11/01/2017 60 4.7 Student103 Oldman Gary 4002 Mathematics General 4 11/01/2017 60 4.6 Student105 O’Tool Peter 4002 Mathematics General 4 11/01/2017 60 5.7 Student107 Phoenix River 4002 Mathematics General 4 11/01/2017 60 Below 1.0
RECOVERY CLINICS IN FIFE AND MOBILE HARM REDUCTION UNIT ACCESS POINTS IN FIFE – JUNE 2015 Anyone wishing help for their alcohol and/or drug problem may attend any of the Open Access Recovery Clinics or mobile unit sessions listed below: *Please arrive at Drop-Ins in time to allow for 30 mins to complete triage or BBV testing ADAPT – Direct Access service aimed at General Population for anyone affected by alcohol and drugs including legal highs and medications. Drop in service offers advice, information, assessment, brief intervention and signposting. Home visits/assessments should be arranged through ADAPT. Telephone: 01592 321 321 MONDAY Kirkcaldy FASS Office, Tolbooth Street, KY1 1RW ADAPT 10.00am - 12.00pm Kirkcaldy Interview Room 2, Phase 3 (Main) Reception - Victoria Hospital, Hayfield Road, Kirkcaldy, KY2 5AH ADAPT 1.30pm – 4.00pm Dunfermline Clinic 6, Queen Margaret Hospital, Whitefield Road, Dunfermline Fife KY12 0SU ADAPT 5.00pm – 8.00pm TUESDAY Lochgelly Consulting Room A, Lochgelly Health Centre, David Street, Lochgelly, KY5 9QZ ADAPT 1.30pm – 3.30pm WEDNESDAY Cowdenbeath Cowdenbeath Clinic, 80 Rowan Terrace, KY4 9JQ ADAPT 10.00am – 12.00pm Glenrothes Glenrothes YMCA, North Street, Glenrothes, KY7 5PP – ADAPT 2.00pm – 4.00pm St. Andrews Health Promotion Room 2, (Minor Injuries) St. Andrews Community Hospital, Largo Road, St. Andrews, KY16 8AR ADAPT 10.00am – 12.00pm THURSDAY Leven The Centre ( Leven Community Centre), Commercial Road, Leven KY8 4QW ADAPT 9.30am – 12.00pm Kirkcaldy Linton Lane Centre, Linton Lane, Kirkcaldy, KY2 6LF ADAPT 1.00pm – 3.00pm FRIDAY Dunfermline 24 Canmore St, Dunfermline (access at back of building through car park) ADAPT 10.00am – 12.30pm 1.30pm - 4.00pm Cont/
Agenda: Time Title Speaker 13:15 – 13:20 Welcome and Introduction Johannes Jütting Manager, PARIS21 13:20 – 13:35 PARIS21 Advanced Data Planning Tool Geoffrey Greenwell, Technical Coordinator, PARIS21 13:35 – 13:45 UNSD Development Account Project Matthias Reister, Senior Statistician, UNSD 13:45 – 14:05 Discussants: The Philippines and Rwanda (ADAPT Pilot Countries) Lisa Bersales, National Statistician, Philippines Dominique Habimana, Director, National Institute of Statistics, Rwanda 14:05 – 14:25 Open discussion and questions for panellists 14:25 – 14:30 Conclusions and way forward Johannes Jütting, Secretariat Manager, PARIS21
development of ADA policy, management of the ADA program in the SHOPP, guidance to district personnel in project initiation and development, updates to the ADA transition plan database, ADA program data management and reporting, development and contract management of consultant contracts, oversight of the grievance intake and investigation process, and interaction with the access consultant. Expenditures Towards FY 2014-15 Annual Commitment: $711,347 Costs Associated With Establishing and Managing the New Accessibility Grievance Procedure and Access Request Process. As the owneroperator of the State’s transportation infrastructure, including pedestrian facilities, Caltrans has a legal obligation to respond to complaints regarding accessibility barriers brought to its attention by persons with disabilities and others. As part of the terms of the settlement agreement, Caltrans has revised its procedures for responding to accessibility grievances and access complaints to be in compliance with U.S. Department of Justice regulations. The grievance and intake process was being operated by a consultant contract with National ADA Accrediting and Consulting (ADAAC). The ADA intake process is accessible in several formats including an online intake form available at http://www.dot.ca.gov via the ADA Access Request button and at . Contract expenditures towards the FY 2014-15 annual commitment total $899,960. A district ADA engineer has been designated in each of Caltrans’ twelve districts to provide district input on ADA grievance and access request resolutions, initiate ADA improvement projects, update Caltrans’ ADA transition plan database, and provide technical guidance to project development teams and others on access improvement projects. Funding for nine personnel years, ($720,496) has been redirected from other traffic safety investigations to provide this service for the Caltrans ADA Infrastructure Program in FY 2014-15. Expenditures Towards FY 2014-15 Annual Commitment: $1,620,456 Completion of Caltrans’ Infrastructure Assessment of Accessibility Barriers. Phase I and II of the assessment of Caltrans’ infrastructure have been completed and include the assessment of 4,000 miles of sidewalks and street crossings and more than 30,000 locations for compliance with federal and State ADA standards. The results of
Governance Council Committee Meetings Minutes ADA Committee Date of Minutes Posting: 1/27/14 Meeting Date: 1/13/14 Meeting Start Time: 2:00pm Meeting Actual Start Time: 2:10pm Meeting Location: Room 0028, Knight Campus Meeting Secretary : Daphne Gilles Member Attendance Committee Member Name Title Present Notes Daphne Gilles Director, Disability Services for Students Office Y Julie Galleshaw Associate Professor, Dental Health Programs Y Michael Cunningham Dean of Students Y Sheri Norton Director, Human Resources Y slnorton@ccri.edu Tracy Karasinski Dean, Opportunity and Outreach Y David Snow Associate Director, Physical Plant Y Rob Giovino Associate Director, Admissions Y Lisa Mallozzi Director, Advising and Counseling Y lmallozzi@ccri.edu Jackie Hogan Administrative Assistant, President’s Office & Marketing/Communications Y Jhogan1@ccri.edu Maureen McGarry Dean, Health & Rehabilitative Sciences N mmcgarry@ccr.edu Robin Donnelly Coordinator, Human Resources N Michael Gonzalez Senior Teller, Bursar’s Office N Sandra Sneesby Assistant Professor, Computer Studies N Dawn Lewis Director of User Support N dalewis@ccri.edu Guests in Attendance
ADASS TASK FORCE A Screening tool to prioritise the allocation of requests to authorise a deprivation of liberty Due to the vast increase in demand for assessments under the Deprivation of liberty safeguards the ADASS task force members have shared practice in relation to prioritisation and produced this screening tool. The aim of the tool is to assist Councils to respond in a timely manner to those requests which have the highest priority. The tool sets out the criteria most commonly applied which indicates that an urgent response may be needed so as to safeguard the individuals concerned. The use of this tool must be balanced against the legal criteria for the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards which remains unchanged. The criteria should be used as an indicative guide only as it will generally be based on information provided by the Managing Authority in the application and each case must be judged on its own facts. HIGHER MEDIUM LOWER Psychiatric or Acute Hospital and not free to leave Continuous 1:1 care during the day and / or night Sedation/medication used frequently to control behaviour Physical restraint used regularly – equipment or persons Restrictions on family/friend contact (or other Article 8 issue) Objections from relevant person (verbal or physical) Objections from family /friends Attempts to leave Confinement to a particular part of the establishment for considerable period of time New or unstable placement Possible challenge to Court of Protection, or Complaint Already subject to DoL about to expire Asking to leave but not consistently Not making any active attempts to leave Appears to be unsettled some of the time Restraint or medication used infrequently. Appears to meet some but not all aspects of the acid test Minimal evidence of control and supervision No specific restraints or restrictions being used. E.g. in a care home not objecting, no additional restrictions in place. Have been living in the care home for some time ( at least a year ) Settled placement in care home/hospital placement, no evidence of objection etc. but may meet the requirements of the acid test. End of life situations, intensive care situations which may meet the acid test but there will be no benefit to the person from the Safeguards CASE NO: DATE: PRIORITISED BY : SUMMARY OF CRITERIA ALLOCATED PRIORITY:
(2) Upon advance request, assisting people with physical disabilities who wish to participate and give testimony in public meetings and hearings. Such assistance shall include: the use of sign language interpreters, listening assistance mechanisms, a telecommunications device for the deaf, recording devises, or providing documents in an alternative (e.g. large print, tape recordings, Braille or electronic formats, or individuals to explain the content of visual displays); and (3) Providing a contact person’s telephone number in all meeting and hearing notices and advertisements for individuals to contact regarding any requests for assistance or reasonable accommodation. ADA Community Advisory Working Group In July 2012, INDOT chartered its ADA Community Advisory Working Group and held its first meeting on October 10, 2012. INDOT created the ADA Working Group to provide an opportunity for interested persons, including individuals with disabilities, disability organizations and organizations representing individuals with disabilities, to participate in the self-evaluation process by submitting comment. The Title VI/ADA Program Manager facilitates the quarterly meetings of the ADA Working Group and coordinates with Communications to publicize the meetings. Website The Title VI/ADA Program Manager periodically updates the INDOT website as needed with information and resources concerning INDOT’s ADA compliance efforts. The website includes a link to the complaint form, relevant laws, INDOT’s nondiscrimination statement, training schedules and a sub-recipient toolbox. The sub-recipient toolbox includes sample forms and answers to frequently asked questions for organizations, agencies, contractors, consultants, etc. who receive federal funds from INDOT. Additionally, the website includes INDOT’s nondiscrimination statement, ADA Working Group charter, meeting schedule, agendas and meeting minutes. The website also includes a listing of the ADA Working Group members and copies of related press releases announcing the formation of the working group and meeting dates. Each visitor using the INDOT website has the right to obtain information and services independently, conveniently and in an alternate format upon request. In accordance with Indiana Code 4-13.1-3, all state information, technology, equipment, software and systems used by the public or state employees complies with the accessibility standards of Section 50 of the Federal Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Section 508).
10. Risk Management Project Briefs Technical Consultant Commissioning Key Service Pressures Sustainability What selected courses for Construction Project Management and Health Planning could be suggested DATE OF NEXT MEETING Even though Friday 6th June 2014, 14:00 was agreed this now needs to be changed so a new date will be confirmed. JT to send a doodle poll with available dates. .................Signature of Chair............................. (Date Signed) Action: MS/MP Action: GM/MS Action: SB/MP/MS Action: MS Action: EW Action: JT
Program Requirements Observations, Comments, Discussion Financial Management Ensure the site understands that it must maintain a non-profit food service which means that all Program funds must be used to provide Program meals in compliance with Program requirements. Ensure the site understands that the Program funds must be kept in a separate account or accounted for as a separate ledger item in their accounting system. CACFP funds help defray the cost of the food program and are not intended to pay for all of the food program operations. Ensure the site understands the documentation requirements related to financial management. Ensure that time distribution records are maintained, if required. Discuss the procurement requirements and explain the documentation that must be maintained to demonstrate compliance with procurement requirements. Review Section 7000, Financial Management of the handbook. Record Retention Requirements Explain that Program records must be maintained for 3 years, or until audit findings, claims, or litigation have been resolved. Ensure the site understands what records would be considered Program records. Civil Rights Requirements Discuss civil rights requirements with the site including training requirements and the required poster that must be displayed. Ensure the site has the poster. Ensure the site has a process for handling complaints and can explain the complaint procedure.
1. What does the term (w + 3) represent? Solution: The term (w + 3) represents the length of the rectangle. Students write an equation or inequality in one variable to model a contextual situation. Students define the variable and use appropriate units. Writing Linear Equations You are ordering tulip bulbs from a catalog. One bulb is $0.75. Shipping is $3.00. How many bulbs can be bought for $30. Solution: Let x = the number of tulip bulbs 3 + 0.75x = 30 x = 36 Writing Linear Inequalities The admission price to the fair is $10. Ride tickets cost $3 each. You only have $40 in cash to spend on admission and rides. Write an inequality and solve it to find how many ride tickets you can buy. Solution: Let x = the number of ride tickets 10 + 3x ≤ 40 x ≤ 10 Given a contextual situation, write equations in two variables that represent the relationship that exists between the quantities. Graph the equations. Writing linear equations The school bookstore rents graphing calculators for $5 per month. It also collects a fee of $10.00 for the school year. Write the rule for the total cost (c) of renting a calculator as a function of the number of months, m. Solution: c = 10 + 5m Writing exponential equations A population of 50 insects triples in size every month. Write a rule to model the population after x months.
GLOSSARY Requirement When Required Further Information Useful Links Relevant Application Form All applications for planning permission and associated consents Forms can be completed and submitted on line/printed via the Planning Portal. Ownership Certificate, Notices and Declaration (the certificate and notice are imbedded within the application form All applications for planning permission or listed building consent to enable the LPA to be clear on who owns the site An ‘owner’ is anyone with a freehold interest or leasehold interest the unexpired term of which is not less than seven years. An ‘agricultural tenant’ is a tenant of an agricultural holding, any part of which is comprised in the land to which the application relates. Notices must be served in accordance with Article 11, Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2010. An application is not valid, and therefore cannot be determined by the local planning authority, unless the relevant certificate has been completed. It is an offence to complete a false or misleading certificate, either knowingly or recklessly, with a maximum fine of up to £5,000. Correct Fee All applications where a fee is applicable under the regulations. Please refer to our fees guide on the Planning Portal
Your privacy rights The data you’ve provided will be used by Battersea Dogs & Cats Home to assess your application for a grant and to communicate with you regarding your application. Should your application be successful we will use your data to manage your grant. To help better understand and tailor communications, we may analyse information provided, including information from public sources. Further information about how we protect and use personal data is set out in our at: battersea.org.uk/privacy Please note that the deadline for application forms is 12 noon on Thursday 25th October 2018. Applications received after this deadline cannot be considered. Please ensure that this application is signed by the appropriate person. Please tick to confirm - I have read all the guidelines I have completed every question on this form I have included our latest income / expenditure accounts Additional information is clearly marked with the name of our organisation We are happy to receive via email or print copy, future grant news and opportunities Signed _______________________ Date ___________________________ Name ( please print ) __________________________ Position _____________ On completion please forward your application with any other document(s) Either to Or Margaret Hulme, The Grants Manager Battersea Dogs & Cats Home 4 Battersea Park Road London SW8 4AA
11:45 – 13:15 Theme 2: Measures and Strategies for Mitigating Risks from Population Growth, Urbanization and Immigration 11:45 – 12:00 Spatial planning as a tool for heritage protection, Costa Rica master plans Rosendo PUJOL MESALLES Karla BARRANTES CHAVES Claudia LÓPEZ OVIEDO (Costa Rica) 12:00 – 12:15 Testing the R-RET as a tool for a-priori evaluation of retail-reuse projects Bie PLEVOETS Koenraad VAN CLEEMPOEL (Belgium) 12:15– 12:30 The historic urban landscape of Tunis: Tools for analysing the heritage process Faika BEJAOUI (Tunisia) 12:30– 12:45 New and old Architecture in Historic Cairo, Case study of al-Darb al-Ahmar Ahmed SAID AMER (Egypt) 12:45 – 13:00 Back to the past – Reversing the effects of urbanization at the historic site of Jogeshwari caves in Mumbai Brinda GAITONDE NAYAK (India) 13:00 – 13:15 The Satanic Verses revisited: approaches to heritage and development control in Central Sydney Peter PHILLIPS (Australia) 13:15 – 14:15 Lunch 14:15 – 15:30 Theme 3: Protecting Cultural Heritage in Times of Tourism and Commercialization 14:15 – 14:30 Difficult buildings - challenging solutions: Adaptive re-use of built heritage under urban pressure Robyn RIDDETT (Australia) 14:30 – 14:45 Case study: using quantitative and qualitative knowledge integration methods to face development challenges in environmental and cultural management. What is the role of cultural heritage in this problematic? Ofelia SANOU ALFARO (Costa Rica) 14:45 – 15:00 Tourism as a threat or opportunity: alliances to mitigate risks in the preservation of intangible cultural heritage in Costa Rica Giselle CHANG VARGAS (Costa Rica) 15:00 – 15:15 Heritage Site Preservation: The case of Quepos, Costa Rica and its “Zona Americana” and “Zona Cero” Rosendo PUJOL MESALLES Karla BARRANTES CHAVES Claudia LÓPEZ OVIEDO Daniela AVILA BOLANOS (Costa Rica) 15:15 – 15:30 Protecting cultural heritage of Palanga in times of tourism and commercialization Marija NEMUNIENE (Lithuania) 15:30 - 15:40 Introduction to Breakout Sessions Can heritage be saved from globalization and uncontrolled development? Pamela Jerome
Coast, including partnering with Nambour Community Centre to deliver four interfaith dialogue events on the Sunshine Coast in June 2018. Outcome: A respectful and inclusive narrative about diversity Action Lead Timeframe Progress status Legend: On track Completed Yet to commence Ceased Achievements and outcomes Please provide commentary eg. 3-4 dot points of advice on achievements and outcomes. Include qualitative and quantitative data if available/relevant. If action has ceased please include reason. Deliver training programs which provide information on discrimination law, unconscious bias and financial benefits of diverse and inclusive workplaces. ADCQ 2016–19 On track In 2017-18 the ADCQ delivered 271 training sessions across Queensland to approximately 4321 people. Training sessions included Unconscious Bias (59), Business Benefits of Diverse & Inclusive Workplaces (6) and Introduction to the
Celebrate National Reconciliation Week (NRW) by providing opportunities for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander employees and other employees to build and maintain stronger relationships with local communities. All Regional Managers and Deputy Commissioner 27 May- 3 June 2017, 2018 and 2019 All staff encouraged to participate in at least one event per office during NRW. Organise four internal NRW events for ADCQ staff each year. Register ADCQ events on Reconciliation Australia’s NRW website. Encourage staff and senior leaders to participate in external events to recognise and celebrate NRW. Maintain and leverage mutually beneficial relationships with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, communities and organisations to support positive outcomes. Coordinator, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Unit, Assistant Human Rights Officer and Coordinator, Community Engagement March 2017 Implement and review engagement plan to work with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, communities and stakeholders. Each ADCQ office to meet with three local Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander organisations to develop guiding principles for future engagement. Commit to establishing three formal two-way partnerships to build capacity in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander organisations and/or communities relevant to our sphere of influence. Raise internal and external awareness of ADCQ RAP to promote reconciliation across our business and stakeholder sector. RAP Working Group and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Unit April, July and October 2017, 2018 and 2019 Implement and review a strategy to communicate our RAP to all internal and external stakeholders. Promote reconciliation through ongoing active engagement with all stakeholders. Our senior leaders are engaged in the delivery of RAP outcomes. Celebrate and pay Tribute to Eddie Mabo and the landmark High Court Decision through oration event in partnership with Queensland Performing Arts Centre (QPAC). Commissioner, Director Community Engagement, and Coordinator, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Unit June 2017 Host the 2017 Mabo oration event in partnership with QPAC Use event as a platform to educate and pay homage to Eddie Mabo in continued dialogue for ongoing rights to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Actively seek a major sponsor to continue delivery of the Mabo Oration or similar tribute to Eddie Mabo beyond 2017.
Daily Production Record Date: Preparer: Projected Participants Component Foods to be Served Amounts Required Amounts to be Prepared Comments3 Breakfast M/MA4 CN Label Eligible Adults Fruit or Veg Grains Ineligible Adults 1%/Skim¹, ² AM Snack (Serve 2 of 5 components) M/MA CN Label Eligible Adults Vegetable Fruit Ineligible Adults Grains 1%/Skim¹, ² Lunch M/MA CN Label Eligible Adults Vegetable Fruit or Veg Ineligible Adults Grains 1%/Skim¹, ² PM Snack (Serve 2 of 5 components) M/MA CN Label Eligible Adults Vegetable Fruit Ineligible Adults Grains 1%/Skim¹, ² Supper M/MA CN Label Eligible Adults Vegetable Fruit or Veg Ineligible Adults Grains 1%/Skim¹, ² Add’l Snck (Serve 2 of 5 components) M/MA CN Label Eligible Adults Vegetable Fruit Ineligible Adults Grains 1%/Skim¹, ² Amounts Required: Total minimum amount of food required to be served, based on meal pattern serving size requirements and number of participants in each age group. May use the to determine amounts. Amounts to be Prepared: Total amount of each food item that will actually be prepared in order to provide the minimum amount of each food as indicated in Amounts Required Column. May use the to determine amounts. When recording amounts include pack size units, i.e. can size, pounds, ounces, and gallons.