Tick box Yes / No / Not applicable Operate wind in ways that minimise bird mortality, for example by introducing shutdowns during peak migration and minimising lighting in wind farms Tick box Yes / No / Not applicable Dismantling of wind turbines in existing installations, should waterbird mortality have an effect on the population status of a species and other mitigation measures have proved insufficient Tick box Yes / No / Not applicable Focusing research efforts on alleviating the negative effects on waterbirds from wind farms, such as the mapping of the main migration corridors and migration crossings for waterbirds also allowing the optimising of wind farm layouts Tick box Other Please specify below and provide details. 55.6. Have any specific measures been put in to assess, identify and reduce potential negative impacts of biofuel production on migratory waterbirds and their habitats? [Tick mark] YES Please provide details [Tick mark] NO Please explain the reasons. What are the constraints preventing implementation of this activity? [Tick mark] NOT APPLICABLE Please explain 55.7. Have the measures contained in Resolution 5.11. been included in your country’s National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans and relevant legislation? [Tick mark] YES Please provide details [Tick mark] NO Please explain the reasons. What are the constraints preventing implementation of this activity? Field for additional information (optional) 56. Has your country used the following (Resolution 6.11)? [Tick mark] YES Please provide details
70. Have measures been taken by your country to implement the provisions related to “Education and Information” in the AEWA Action Plan over the last triennium? (AEWA Action Plan, Paragraphs 6.1-6.4) [Tick mark] YES – SEE EXPANDED QUESTIONS BELOW [Tick mark] NO Please explain the reasons IF YES Expanded Question Please indicate which measures have been taken: a. National training programmes have been arranged for personnel responsible for implementing AEWA [Tick mark] YES – SEE EXPANDED QUESTIONS BELOW [Tick mark] NO Please explain the reasons IF “Yes “is ticked, the following pops up: How can the effectiveness of the measures be [Tick mark] High [Tick mark] Moderate [Tick mark] Low [Tick mark] Other Please provide details Field for additional information (optional) b. Training programmes and materials have been developed in cooperation with other Parties and/or the Agreement Secretariat [Tick mark] YES – SEE EXPANDED QUESTIONS BELOW [Tick mark] NO Please explain the reasons IF “Yes “is ticked, the following pops up: How can the effectiveness of the measures be rated? [Tick mark] High
5.2.4 Long-term Method used Select one of the following methods: a) Complete survey or a statistically robust estimate b) Based mainly on extrapolation from a limited amount of data c) Based mainly on expert opinion with very limited data d) Insufficient or no data available 5.2.5 Sources Give bibliographic references, link to Internet sites, expert contact details, etc. Free text 5.3 Additional information Optional relevant information, complementary to the data requested under sections 5.1 and 5.2. Free text 6 Progress in work related to international Species Action Plans (SAPs), Management Plans (MPs) and Brief Management Statements (BMSs) 6.1 Type of international plan SAP/MP/BMS (according to bird species checklist in the Reference portal 6.2 Has a national plan linked to the international SAP/MP/BMS been adopted? Has a national plan linked to the international SAP/MP/BMS been adopted? YES/NO 6.3 If ‘NO’, describe any measures and initiatives taken related to the international SAP/MP/BMS Describe any measures and initiatives related to the international SAP/MP/BMS. Refer, when relevant, to code numbers of the actions in the plan Free text 6.4 Assessment of the effectiveness of SAPs for globally threatened species (Art. 12, Species Action Plans) Indicate if species’ national status (with respect to numbers and is: a) moving towards the plan's aim/objective(s) or b) unchanged or c) further deteriorating away from the plan’s aim/objective(s) 6.5 Assessment of the effectiveness of MPs for huntable species in non-Secure status (Articles 3 and 7, Management Plans) Indicate if species’ national status (with respect to numbers and range) is: a) improving or b) unchanged or c) further deteriorating 6.6 Sources of further information (e.g. for national plan), published reports, etc. Free text 7 Main pressures and threats To be reported for all I species and non-Annex I species triggering SPA classification (as identified in the bird species checklist in the Reference portal) 7.1 Characterisation of pressures/threats