zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Wednesday October 15, 2014 Time Presentation Presenter CE Location 7:30am – 2:00pm Board Meeting ROOM 1:00pm Registration Opens FOYER 1:00pm Exhibitor Set Up Begins EVENT CENTER 2:00pm -3:30pm PSHP Update and Healthcare Impact on Pharmacy Services Pharmacist Objectives: 1. Discuss the current topics pertaining to PSHP. 2. Identify and discuss the current healthcare environment and its effects on services that pharmacists provide. Technician Objectives: 1. Discuss the current topics pertaining to PSHP. 2. Discuss the impact that the current healthcare environment has on the duties and responsibilities of pharmacy technicians. Jennifer M. Belavic, PharmD, MBA, BCPS, FASCP 1.5 Monroe ROOM 3:30pm – 4:30pm Implementation of a Specialty Pharmacy Pharmacist Objectives: 1. What are important roles for Pharmacists within Richard Demers, MS, RPh, FASHP & Nishaminy Kasbekar, BS, PharmD, FASHP 1 Monroe ROOM
Specialty Pharmacy? Technician Objectives: 2. What are unique roles for Pharmacy Technicians within Specialty Pharmacy? 4:30pm- 6:00pm Update of Antidiabetic Medications Pharmacist Objectives: 1. Review the major pathophysiologic defects in Type 2 Diabetes and targeted sites for medications 2. Describe the newer antidiabetic medication classes along with specific agents within the classes. Technician Objectives: Technicians will recognize these newer agents in the course of carrying out their duties Robert W. Rossi, RPh, CDE 1.5 Monroe ROOM 4:30pm- 6:00pm Reverse Trade Show EVENT CENTER 6:00pm- 7:00pm Cocktail Reception with Exhibits Open EVENT CENTER 7:00pm- 8:00pm Sponsored Product Theater Dinner Monroe Room TOTAL CE: 4 Thursday October 16, 2014 Time Presentation Title/Event Presenter 7:00am - 8:00am Novo Nordisk Sponsored Breakfast Redefining the Use of Basal Insulin: Combining Sustained Deebeanne Tavani, DO, PhD EVENT CENTER/Buck Room
Technician Objectives: 1. List PSHP Advocacy activities 2. Describe the process of a bill 3. Explain how to speak to your representative or Senator 2:30pm – 2:45pm Break 2:45pm – 4:45pm Current Topics in Hospital Pharmacy- Patient Safety Clinical Pearls Medication Safety Initiatives Pediatric Pharmacokinetic Pearls Evaluating the Quality of Dietary Supplements For Pain or Not for Pain: Methadone Madness Inhaled epoprostenol: Clinical and practical considerations Pharmacists as a Safety Measure in the Emergency Department Standardizing Compounded Pediatric and Neonatal Medications Pharmacist Objectives: 1. Discuss medication safety initiatives incorporated into Clinical Pearls Laura Haynes, PharmD, BCPS Jenny Boucher, BS, PharmD, JD, BCPS Sarah C. Erush, PharmD, BCPS Foy, PharmD, BCPS, CPE Peter Hlavinka, PharmD, BCPS Christopher Shaw, PharmD, BCPS Laura Hayn, PharmD, BCPS 2 Monroe ROOM
Steering Group Meeting – Succeed In Sambre Avesnois Maubeuge - 9/10 July 2015 Wednesday 8th July 18:30 Arrival and departure to restaurant 19:00 Welcome dinner Thursday 9th July 08.30 Pick up at 09.00 – 12.30 Partnership Meeting & Workshop Presentation from SEUK on completion of current piece of work Workshop on development of Framework Doc SEUK to present ideas Partners to input and develop Input from partners to the project’s Policy and Recommendations. 12.30 – 13.30 Lunch 13.30 – 17.30 Terrain Visits – the region and the Sambre River 18.30 Pick up at hotel 19.00 - … Dinner Friday 10th July 08.30 Pick up at hotel 09.00 – 12.30 Partnership Meeting & Workshop (Continued) The Social Enterprise Zone (SEZ) Review of progress to date
SBM / SAO Network Meeting Thursday 27th September 2018 9.30am – 12pm at Lilla Huset Professional Centre 191 Talgarth Road Hammersmith W6 8BJ Tel: 0208 846 2580 For: SBM’s / SAO’s in Nursery, Primary and Special Schools An opportunity for Business Managers and Senior Administrators to develop their skills, share practice and support one another AGENDA Present Minutes of last meeting RBS – schools purchase Children’s Services Finance – updates on SAP implementation, BACS payments, Ethical school meal debt collection Marlon Barnes, Health and Safety Advisor – Health & Safety training update and audit Future Meetings – agenda items / speakers Any Other Business R.S.V.P. to Caroline Plummer at
2nd Sustainable Development Goals Summit 2018 Leveraging CSR for achieving SDGs Date: 12th December, 2018 Venue: Hotel Sahara Star, Mumbai SUMMIT SCHEDULE TIME SESSION TITLE SPEAKERS 09:00 am – 9:30 am Registration 09:30 am – 09:35 am 09:35 am – 09:45 am 09:45 am – 10:00 am 10:00 am – 10:10 am 10:10 am – 10:25 am 10:25 am – 10:40 am 10:40 am – 10:50 am 10:50 am – 10:55 am INAUGURAL SESSION Welcome Address Summit Overview Theme Address Launch of Publications and Awards Ceremony Special Address Keynote Address Concluding Remarks Vote of Thanks Mr. Kamal Singh, Executive Director, UN GCNI Mr. Anirban Ghosh - Summit Director & CSO, Mahindra Group Dr. Bhaskar Chatterjee – Convener & Secretary General, Indian Steel Association Awards Ceremony for 2nd SDGs Quiz Mr. Yuri Afanasiev, UN Resident Coordinator and UNDP Resident Representative, India Dr. Rajiv Kumar Vice Chairman, NITI Aayog* Dr. H Chaturvedi - Summit Director & Director, BIMTECH Kamal Singh, Executive Director, UN GCNI 10:55 am – 11:30 am TEA / COFFEE BREAK 11:30 am –12:45 pm PLENARY SESSION I Accelerating change Establishing interconnect between SDG and CSR MODERATOR Dr. Bhaskar Chatterjee Secretary General, Indian Steel Association
Tuesday, May 10, 2016 9:00 – 9:40 evaluation and validation of the U-235 Data in Thermal and keV Energy Region Haicheng WU 9.40 – 10:20 Evaluation of 238U+n in the resonance region Peter SCHILLEBEECKX 10:20 – 10:30 Coffee Break 10.30 - 11.10 CIELO-related measurements Yaron DANON 11:10 – 12:00 CEA actinide evaluations Pascal ROMAIN/Benjamin MORILLON 12:00 – 13:30 Lunch Break 13:30 – 14:20 IAEA/ORNL/Geel 235,8U evaluations and data testing Andre TRKOV 14:20 – 15:00 Data testing of actinide & oxygen files Skip KAHLER 15:00 – 15:40 Data testing of CIELO files with NDaST Ian HILL 15:40– 16:00 Coffee 16:00 – 16:50 235U and 239Pu resonance analyses Luiz LEAL 16:50 – 17:50 Plutonium evaluation updates - fast region Mark CHADWICK 17:50 – 18:00 Discussions All Wednesday, May 10, 2016
9:00 – 10:00 Discussions All 10:00 – 10:20 Discussions All 10:20 – 10:30 Coffee Break 10.30 - 11.10 Discussions All 11:10 – 12:00 Validation of CIELO iron evaluation against SINBAD benchmark experiments Ivan-Alexander KODELI 12:00– 13:30 Lunch Break Joint Session SG39+SG40 Room CC20 13:30 – 13:50 “Status of SG39 activity and perspectives of potential interest for CIELO” Massimo SALVATORES 13:50 – 14:10 “Overview of Cielo progress as it pertains to collaborations with SG39” Mark CHADWICK 14:10 – 14:25 “Extended adjustment with a wider integral experiment data base” Guiseppe PALMIOTTI 14:25 – 14:40 “Continuous energy adjustments: a potential breakthrough” Manuele AUFIERO 14:40 – 14:55 “Adjustment of U, Pu and Fe cross-sections based on k-eff, ß-eff and shielding benchmark experiments” Lucijan PLEVNIK 14:55 – 15:15 Coffee Break 15:15 – 16:15 “Summarizing Cielo data testing” Andrej TRKOV Skip KAHLER 16:15 – 17:00 Discussion All 17:00 – 18:00 Discussion All Participants in SG40 Meeting (May 4, 2016) # SG40/CIELO Participants 1 Dr Michal Wladyslaw HERMAN
Sponsored by Bureau of Justice Assistance Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice The Council of State Governments Justice Center Training Agenda September 29- October 1, 2015 Michigan State University School of Criminal Justice Marriott Plaza San Antonio 555 S Alamo Street San Antonio, TX 78205 Facilitated by: Ed McGarrell Professor, Michigan State University Tuesday, September 29, 2015: FY13 Smart Supervision Grantees 8:00 a.m. – 8:30 a.m. Registration FY13 Sites 8:30 a.m. – 8:45 a.m. Welcoming Remarks and Introductions 8:45 a.m. – 9:45 a.m. Smart Supervision and the Research Partnership 9:45 a.m. – 10:00 a.m. Break 10:00 a.m. – 10:45 a.m. The Research Partner Role & Building an Effective Partnership 10:45 a.m. – 11:30 a.m. Panel Discussion 11:30 a.m. – 1:00 p.m. Lunch on Your Own 1:00 p.m. – 2:15 p.m. Effective Implementation- Principles of Implementation Science 2:15 p.m. – 2:30 p.m. Break 2:30 p.m. – 3:15 p.m. Effective Implementation- Smart Supervision Applications 3:15 p.m. – 3:45 p.m. Panel Discussion 3:45 p.m. – 4:00 p.m. Break 4:00 p.m. – 4:30 p.m. Evaluation Basics 4:30 p.m. – 5:00 p.m. Ongoing TTA; Questions, Discussion, and Wrap Up
CONTACT INFORMATION Robyn Carter Outreach Specialist School of Criminal Justice Michigan State University 655 Auditorium Road Room 560, Baker Hall East Lansing, MI 48824 (904) 466-5888 rcarter@msu.edu Ronin A. Davis, LMSW Grantee Technical Assistance Manager, Community Initiatives Council of State Governments Justice Center 22 Cortland Street, Floor 22 New York, NY (646) 383-5760 Daisy Diallo Program Associate Council of State Governments Justice Center 4630 Montgomery Avenue Suite 650 Bethesda, MD 20814 (240) 482-8577 ddiallo@csg.org Natalie Hipple, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Criminal Justice Indiana University 1033 East Third Street 309 Sycamore Hall Bloomington, IN 47405 (812) 856-2759 Juliene James Senior Policy Advisor Bureau of Justice Assistance Washington, D.C. (202) 353-9248 Deborah Koetzle, Ph.D. Associate Professor and Executive Officer John Jay College of Criminal Justice/CUNY New York, NY 10019 (212) 621-3758 dkoetzle@jjay.cuny.edu Edmund F. McGarrell, Ph.D. Director and Professor School of Criminal Justice Michigan State University 655 Auditorium Road Room 560, Baker Hall East Lansing, MI 48824 517.355.2197 Andrew Molloy Director Colonial Heights Community Corrections Services P.O. Box 40 10111 Krause Road Chesterfield, VA (804) 318-8220 Heather Perez Outreach Specialist School of Criminal Justice Michigan State University 655 Auditorium Road Room 560, Baker Hall East Lansing, MI 317.774.9043 Faye S. Taxman, Ph.D. University Professor George University Criminology, Law & Society 4087 University Drive 4100 MSN 6D3 Fairfax, VA 22030 (703) 993- 8555 Heather Tubman-Carbone, Ph.D. Grantee Technical Assistance Manager, Corrections and Reentry Council of State Governments Justice Center 4630 Montgomery Ave., Suite 650 Bethesda, MD (240) 482-8580 htubman-carbone@csg.org
09:00 – 09:30 Registration 09:30 – 10:00 Inaugural address 10:00 – 10:30 Experiences on Implementation of Kayakalp in 2015-16. 10:30 – 11:15 Overview of Kayakalp and Swachh Bharat Abhiyan 11:15 – 11:30 Tea 11:30 – 12:00 Assessment Protocol 12:00 – 12:45 Facility Management 12:45 – 13:30 New Dimensions in Bio- Medical Waste management 13:30- 14:00 14:00 – 15:00 Exercise- Group work 15:00 – 15:45 Waste Management- Special Consideration 15:45 – 16:00 Tea 16:00 – 16:45 Green & Energy efficient Hospital 16:45 – 17:30 Hospital 09:00 – 09:30 Recap 09:30 – 10:15 Infection Control Practices-1 10:15 – 11:00 Infection Control Practices-11 11:00 – 11:15 Tea
11:15 – 12:00 Infection Control Program 12:00 – 12:45 Management of support services 12:45 – 13:30 Promoting “Kayakalp” & “Swachh Bharat Abhiyan” 13:30 – 14:15 Lunch 14:15- 15:00 Exercise- Hospital Surveillance 15:00 – 15:45 Managing & sustaining transformation 15:45 – 16:00 Tea 16:00- 16:30 Quiz 16:30 – 16:45 Road Map on implementation of Kayakalp
9:20 I.2 Conceptual understanding of NAP process Introductory lecture Matrix Exercise Wrap-up Trainer Team A 10:45 Tea 11:15 Feed-back to Trainer Team Alfred Eberhardt Catalina Berger 11:40 II.2 Institutions for national adaptation planning Part A Introductory lecture Card collection exercise Part A Wrap-up Trainer Team B 12:40 Lunch 13:40 II.2 Institutions for national adaptation planning Part B Mapping exercise Part B Wrap-up Trainer Team B 14:30 Feed-back to Trainer Team Alfred Eberhardt Catalina Berger 14:55 Tea Break 15:25 III.4 Mainstream adaptation to development planning Introductory lecture Reading time for participants Matrix Exercise Wrap-up Trainer Team C 16:55 Feed-back to Trainer Team Alfred Eberhardt Catalina Berger 17:20 End of day 4 17:20 Meeting of the CMC Day 5, 27 April 2015 Time Topic Facilitation 9:00 Recap day 4 Member of CMC 9:10 IV.2 Financing adaptation Introductory lecture Matrix Exercise Wrap-up Trainer Team D
NWAA AGM & Winter Member Forum Monday 7th December 2015 (16:30 – 19:00) Best Western, Leyland Agenda 16:30 – 17:15 Networking, Registration and Coffee 17:15 – 17:30 Welcome, Introductions – NWAA Supply Chain Workshop Roadmap Dr. David W. Bailey, Chief Executive, NWAA 17:30 – 17:50 BAE Systems: Supply Chain Opportunities and Challenges Steve Vandersteen, MAI Airframe Supply Chain Director – F-35 & Operations, BAE Systems 17.50 – 18:10 A&G Precision Improvement Journey: ‘Transition from ASCE to SC21’ Andy Cash, Business Development Executive, A&G Precision 18:10 – 18:30 Strengthening Aerospace productivity using industry 4.0 technology Andrew Steel, Forecam, Managing Director 18.30 – 18:50 Improving the UK Aerospace Supply Chain Neil Barrnett, Aerospace Director, ADS 18:50 – 18:55 Events Calendar 2016 Sharon McDonald, Head of Marketing & Communications 18:55 – 19:00 Q & A Event Close Event Sponsors:
AGENDA North Carolina Investment Adviser Regulation Workshop 9:00 am – 4:00 pm Presented by NC Securities Division 9:00 am – 9:30 am Registration Coffee and Snacks 9:30 am – 9:40 am Welcome 9:45 am – 11:30 Investment Adviser Fiduciary Duty and Best Practices Presented by: Elizabeth Guido ChFC®, CLU®, CFE 11:30 – Noon Investor Education Presented by: John Maron Noon – 1:00 PM Lunch 1:00 pm – 3:30 pm Investment Adviser Fiduciary Duty and Best Practices (continued) and Division Examination Program Presented by: Elizabeth Guido ChFC®, CLU®, CFE 3:30 pm – 4:00 pm Question and Answer Session/Wrap-Up Additional: Please take a minute and complete an evaluation
£2k for Improvement to path outside the Mount Care Home Parish Council to claim by 30 July 2016. Reserves include amount from Parish Council balances to match the funding allocated. General Contingency Fund (including Village Hall) 9 May 2016 agreed VAT £2,300.00 £2,300.00 £2,300.00 received to set up general contingency to also cover village hall. If £2k for Mount care work not claimed will transfer into contingency fund 2016 election £4,000.00 £4,000.00 £4,000.00 £4,000.00 £4,000.00 £4,000.00 £4,000.00 Parish Council Balance £12,155.22 £23,979.01 £22,692.52 £21,418.40 £30,167.43 £29,534.28 £20,321.11
Workshop on Regulatory Impact Analysis, Risk Analysis, and the Role of the Private Sector April 24-25, 2017 Southern Sun Ridgeway Lusaka, Zambia PROVISIONAL PROGRAMME Day 1 Time Activity 08.30 – 9.00 hrs Registration/Documentation 09.00 – 10.00 hrs Opening of the meeting Welcome and introductory remarks by BRRA CEO Address by Guest of Honour, PS – MCTI Briefing on ZABS role in the RIA programme by ZABS CEO Briefing on ANSI and the Standards Alliance by ANSI Discussion of workshop overview and goals by RSS Group Adoption of agenda and programme 10.00 – 10.50 Practical Tools: “RIA Light” and Public Consultation Presenter: Nathan Frey, RSS Group Fundamental linkages between RIA and Public Consultation Practical implementation strategies 10.50 – 11.05 hrs Health 11.05 – 12.00 The Rulemaking Process in the United States Presenter (Clare Narrod) Legal underpinnings of the U.S. regulatory process The regulatory review process and the role of analysis Judicial review of regulations and key regulatory case law 12.00 – 13.30 hrs Public Consultation and the use of RIA in Zambia “State of play panel discussion: RIA and Public Consultation Implementation in Zambia” Presentation by BRRA on the current status of the use of RIA and public consultation in the Zambian regulatory process
The Use of RIA and public consultation in the standards development process Standards Development Manager, ZABS Presentation by Zambian regulatory agency on implementation of RIA and public consultation in a particular sector 13:30-14:30 hrs Lunch Break 14.30 – 16.45 hrs Integrating RIA and Public Consultation: Perspectives from the Private Sector “The Benefits of Robust Public Consultation, a U.S. Private Sector Perspective.” Patrick Hedren, General Electric RIA and Public Consultation in Zambia: Experiences of the Private Sector Presentation by Zambian Private Sector representative 16.45 – 17.00 hrs Health Break/End of Day 1 Day 2 Time Activity (Clare Narrod and Maputa Kamulete-Liweleya) 09.00 – 9.30 am Overview of the Risk analysis process 9:30 – 10:00am WTO and risk analysis 10:00 – 10:30am Risk Assessment Tool Box 10.30 - 10.45 hrs Health Break 10:45 – 11:15am Setting up a Risk Assessment 11:15 – 12:15 Zambian case study 12:15 – 12:45pm Qualitative Risk Analysis Tools 12.45 – 14.00pm Lunch Break 14:00 – 16:00pm Breakout sessions: Integrating government and private sector perspectives through practical exercises Zambian regulators and U.S. Private Sector representatives will develop shared answers to key questions concerning practical considerations of RIA and public consultation implementation in Zambia Moderated by Nathan Frey, RSS Group and David Jankowski, ANSI
Agent Application for Agreement Date of Application TYPE Official Name of Agency/Company TYPE List Name(s) of Owner(s) List List List Complete Address TYPE Phone Number TYPE Fax Number TYPE Email Address TYPE Website www. TYPE List Counties / Cities you Represent List List List List Your Staff whom we will be working with Names List List List Job Titles Title Title Title List any formal training related to working as an educational for you and/or your staff TYPE List the Company Services you provide (and associated fees) Services List List List Fee $ $ $
LOWER ALLITHWAITE PARISH COUNCIL “Sunnyside” Holme Lane, Allithwaite, Grange-over-Sands Cumbria LA11 7QD. Tel: 015395 32639 lapc.clerk@gmail.com 6th October 2018 Dear Councillor I enclose a copy of the Minutes of the Meetings of the Council held on Thursday 13th September 2018. You are summonsed to attend the next meeting of the Council which will be held at The Village Hall, Cartmel on Thursday 11th October 2018 at 7.15pm. Yours sincerely Phil Turner Clerk to the Council AGENDA 1 APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE 2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES AS CIRCULATED 3 REQUESTS FOR DISPENSATIONS To report any requests received since the previous meeting to speak and/or vote on any matter where a member has a disclosable pecuniary interest. 4 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST To receive declarations from elected and co-opted members of interests in respect of items on the agenda. 5 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN RELATION TO ITEMS ON THE AGENDA i) None 6 CORRESPONDENCE i) PKF Littlejohn – Notice of satisfactory external audit ii) SLDC Env Health – Royal Oak bins iii) BHIB – Aviva Community Fund iv) Cumbria County Council – Consultation on diversion of footpath 549035 7 PLANNING i) Pre-planning Applications ii) Consideration of relevant planning applications.. iii) Applications approved by SLDC SL/2018/0678 erection of 2 dwellings, Blenkett Farm, Allithwaite. SL/2018/0694 repair work, Kirkhead Tower, Kirkhead Road, Allithwaite. SL/2018/0697 porch extension and pitched roof replacement, Cherry Trees, Haggs Lane, Cartmel iv) Applications Recommended for Approval by the Parish Council SL/2018/0724 new vehicular access to field 6365 Garrett House, Cartmel. v) Applications Recommended for Refusal by the Parish Council SL/2018/0693 4 camping pods and associated works, The Pastures, Templand Lane, Allithwaite. vi) Applications Withdrawn None 8 POLICE REPORT 9 LAP REPORT 10 BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES i) Actions from previous minutes ii) Working Groups Reports a) Cartmel Township – Update b) Allithwaite Community – Update c) Neighbourhood Plan – Update d) Cartmel Toilets – Update e) Cartmel Environment Group – Update iii) Cartmel Village Society – Update. iv) Clerks Report/District Councillors Report/County Councillors Report 11 FINANCE
Open Government Australia Meeting 10.00am – 3.00pm, Friday 28 July 2017 Department of the Prime Minister & Cabinet 1 National Cct Barton, Canberra AGENDA Item Description Responsible Time 1 Welcome and introduction Agenda paper 1 Co-Chairs 10:00AM (30 minutes) 2 A retrospective – OGP and Australia Agenda paper 2 Facilitator 10:30AM (90 minutes) 3 Working lunch – discussion with officers on National Action Plan commitments and Forum reflections Agenda Paper 3 Officers 12:00PM (75 minutes) 4 Planning – role and activities Agenda Paper 4 Co-Chairs 1:15PM (90 minutes) 5. Closing – other business and future meetings Agenda Paper 5 Co-Chairs 2:45PM (15 minutes)
Contact name Position Name of organisation Organisation Registration number When was your organisation established? Does your agency work with students who require visas in order to study in the UK? YES NO If YES, please provide your UK visa refusal rate (%) How many students did you send to the UK last year? How did you hear about us? Address of the Organisation Email Mobile Phone Number Office Phone Number Please select which market sectors you operate in? Juniors Adults Families Groups Corporate/Business University Summer only All year Mini stay for groups How do you market your agency? Company website Printed brochure Word of mouth Pay per click advertising Attending student’s fairs Newspaper/magazines Industry journals
Be able to perform a focused physical exam for the office evaluation of dizziness and a “fall evaluation” on elderly individuals who present with one or more falls. List proven interventions to prevent falls and injury in older individuals. Pressure Ulcers Rosemary A. Kidwiler, MSN, RNC, WOCN Objectives List and assess risk factors for pressure ulcers Develop a prevention strategy for pressure ulcers Evaluate and select appropriate treatment modalities for pressure ulcers. AGES Interdisciplinary Team Care Exercise (previously known as the AGES OSCE) Objectives: Understand the important perspectives interdisciplinary team members bring to the comprehensive care of geriatric patients Demonstrate effective patient and team communication techniques. Receive direct feedback on your contribution to the care of a complex geriatric patient transitioning through an acute hospitalization from admission through discharge. Hands-On Dementia Experience© Amy M. Ernst The Hands-On Dementia Experience© is one component of a comprehensive dementia care training program that the Alzheimer's Association, WV Chapter, believes will greatly enhance the quality of care of individuals with Alzheimer’s disease. The Experience allows participants to experience a few moments of the challenges that many elderly with dementia face daily. Participants are changed physically to simulate some of the effects of aging and given directions that they may not fully understand. The effects of both can lead to confusion, frustration, and a number of other emotions similar to those we see in individuals with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. Learning Objectives: Those who participate in the Hands-On Dementia Experience© should: Gain insight into what a person with dementia experiences and become sensitized to the needs of individuals with dementia Gain a different perspective toward the care of individuals with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias Have a better understanding of the frustrations experienced by people with dementia and behaviors which may be manifested by those frustrations Better understand the challenges caregivers experience in providing care for individuals with dementia. Read Only Chapters "Cancer Screenings Todd H. Goldberg, MD, CMD, FACP
Carvedilol Phosphate ER CAPSULE EXTENDED RELEASE 24 HOUR 40 MG Oral NF 1 Formulary Enhancement N/A Doripenem SOLUTION RECONSTITUTED 500 MG Intravenous NF 2 Formulary Enhancement N/A Eliquis Starter Pack TABLET 5 MG Oral NF 2 Formulary Enhancement N/A Enskyce TABLET 0.15-30 MG-MCG ORAL NF 1 Formulary Enhancement N/A Estradiol 0.1 MG/GM Vaginal NF 1 Formulary Enhancement N/A Herceptin SOLUTION RECONSTITUTED 150 MG Intravenous NF 2 + BD Formulary Enhancement N/A Kurvelo TABLET 0.15-30 MG-MCG ORAL NF 1 Formulary Enhancement N/A Levalbuterol HCl Nebulization Solution 0.63 MG/3ML Inhalation NF 1 + BD Formulary Enhancement N/A Levocetirizine Dihydrochloride TABLET 5 MG Oral NF 1 Formulary Enhancement N/A Levonorgestrel-Ethinyl Estrad TABLET 0.15-30 MG-MCG ORAL NF 1 Formulary Enhancement N/A Lidocaine Viscous SOLUTION 2 % Mouth/Throat NF 1 Formulary Enhancement N/A MedroxyPROGESTERone Acetate Suspension Prefilled Syringe 150 MG/ML Intramuscular NF 1 Formulary Enhancement N/A Roweepra XR Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 500 MG Oral NF 1 Formulary Enhancement N/A
Nitrofurantoin Monohyd Macro CAPSULE 100 MG Oral 1 + PA1 1 Formulary Enhancement N/A Relpax TABLET 20 MG Oral 2 + QL 9 NF Formulary Update eletriptan 20 mg,1 + QL 9 Relpax TABLET 40 MG Oral 2 + QL 9 NF Formulary Update eletriptan 40 mg, 1 + QL 9 Renvela TABLET 800 MG Oral 2 NF Formulary Update sevelamer carbonate 800 mg, 1 Sabril PACKET 500 MG Oral 2 NF Formulary Update vigabatrin 50 mg/ml, 2 Sustiva CAPSULE 50 MG Oral 2 NF Formulary Update efavirenz 50 mg, 1 Symdeko Tablet Therapy Pack 100-150 & 150 MG Oral NF 2 + PA1 + LA Formulary Enhancement N/A Transderm-Scop (1.5 MG) Patch 72 Hour 1 MG/3DAYS Transdermal 2 NF Formulary Update scopolamine 0.0139 mg/hr, 1 Trientine HCl CAPSULE 250 MG Oral NF 1 Formulary Enhancement N/A Trisenox SOLUTION 10 MG/10ML Intravenous 2 + BD NF CMS Required Deletion N/A Videx EC CAPSULE DELAYED RELEASE 125 MG Oral NF 2 Formulary Enhancement N/A Vigamox SOLUTION 0.5 % Ophthalmic 2 NF Formulary Update moxifloxacin 5 mg/ml, 1 Zenpep CAPSULE DELAYED RELEASE PARTICLES 25000-79000 UNIT Oral NF 2 Formulary Enhancement N/A
Synjardy XR Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 10-1000 MG Oral NF 2 Formulary Enhancement N/A Synjardy XR Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 12.5-1000 MG Oral NF 2 Formulary Enhancement N/A Synjardy XR Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 25-1000 MG Oral NF 2 Formulary Enhancement N/A Synjardy XR Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 5-1000 MG Oral NF 2 Formulary Enhancement N/A Triamterene-HCTZ CAPSULE 50-25 MG Oral 1 NF CMS Required Deletion N/A Tri-Mili Tablet 0.18/0.215/0.25 MG-35 MCG Oral NF 1 Formulary Enhancement N/A
Size of industry The height of economic barriers restricting entry of foreign producers into an industry The exit or adjustment strategies of domestic firms. The last 2 are not often stressed in discussions on protectionism. Five industry cases: Textile and apparel Steel Color televisions Footwear Automobiles. Difference Between Negotiated Protectionism and Tariffs or Auctioned Quotas: Unilateral forms of protectionism attempt to shift the burden of adjustment from an importer to an exporter, while VERs constitute cross-national cartel agreements that seek to allocate market shares between exporters and importers, thereby sharing the benefits and burdens of protectionism. VERs restrict exports from specific countries in specific product categories are generally negotiated on a country-by-country basis. Model: High barriers to entry should produce a relatively stable cartel. Conversely, low barriers to entry should vitiate the effectiveness of a VER because unrestrained foreign producers will immediately begin exporting the US and bid away any economic rents. If low barrier to entry: If protectionism fails to raise profits for a domestic industry, then, ceterus paribus, firms will increase the intensity of their demand for future trade barriers and the U.S. government will generally be sympathetic towards supplying additional protection On the hand, if trade barriers improve an industry's economic health, then firms in that industry will reduce the intensity of their lobbying efforts, and the U.S. government will be less receptive to those pleas. Irony for producers: the more profits domestic firms generate as a result of trade barriers, the most difficult it becomes to justify those restrictions. If high barrier to entry: n short, we expect protection to be temporary in initial round. If firms can exit, protection will not be renewed. In industries with high barriers to exit: if they do not adjust, will lead to renewed proeectionism.
age 53.6 y, 24 women: 17 men): because of the similarity of their diet and lifestyle to that of patients, partners were recruited where possible as an attempt to reduce bias resulting from such factors. The patients who agreed to participate in the study gave verbal consent to the physician during the clinic appointment as stipulated in the participant information sheet and the ethics approval, as granted by the Wiltshire Research and Ethics Committee (NRES 06/Q2008/6). All patients were on an ad lib diet before sample collection in order to maximise recruitment and to give ‘real-world’ data. 2.2 – Sample processing All the samples were analysed by the gas chromatography-sensor system in 2012, the device not being available prior to 2012. Faecal samples were processed following the method proposed by Ahmed et al 201323. In summary, 1gm aliquots of faecal samples were stored in 18 ml glass headspace vials (Supelco, Sigma Aldrich) within 6h of sample production and frozen at −20°C. In 2012, samples were processed by the system. Previous studies showed no loss of volatile chemicals from faecal samples stored at −20°C23. Each frozen sample was heated for 10 min at 50°C. After this, 2 cm3 of its headspace were collected and injected into the GC column of the gas chromatography-sensor system15. Detailed descriptions of the hardware and software18 are reported elsewhere. In summary, the gas chromatography-sensor system is composed of a gas chromatography column coupled to a metal oxide gas sensor. The sensor is controlled via an electronic circuit monitored by computer software, which records the electrical
The blue-latex particles used in the StaphTEX™ Blue Latex Reagent are sensitized with specific concentrations of plasma proteins. When coagulase and/or protein A is provided by the culture specimen at detectable levels, they will interact with the sensitized particles to produce visible agglutination/clumping, indicating a positive test for S. aureus. MATERIALS SUPPLIED 1. StaphTEX™ Blue Reagent: Blue-latex particles coated with IgG and human fibrinogen. The latex particles are suspended in a buffer containing 0.098% sodium azide as a preservative. 2. StaphTEX™ Blue Positive Control Reagent: A formulation of non-viable S. aureus in a buffer containing 0.1% sodium azide as a preservative. 3. StaphTEX™ Blue Negative Control Reagent: A formulation of non-viable, Staphylococcus spp. in a buffer containing 0.1% sodium azide as a preservative. negative
Practising Bar 65 3,321 4,415 2,495 852 205 2,342 13,695 41 175 17 5 2 0 187 427 Total 106 3,496 4,593 2,857 973 260 3,409 15,694 Source: Core database (August 2013) Graphs 9a, 9b and 9c show the percentages of practising barristers, QCs and pupils by age. They also show ‘unknown’ category and ‘prefer not to say’ answers. As displayed in the graph age is evenly distributed across the Bar. Among the practising Bar 24% are aged and 32% are 35-44 years. Among QC’s 23% are 45-54 years. This is a 2% increase from last years’ figures. Among pupils 10% are under 25 years old. A large number of the Bar did not disclose this information. In comparison to last year’s Diversity Data report there is very little change based on the age distribution among the Bar. Graph 9a: Core database: Age at the Bar (percentages) Source: Core Database (August 2013) Graph 9b shows a more detailed breakdown of age among the Bar. The largest age group for the practising Bar is 35-44 years 32% followed by 25-34 years 24%. The largest age group among QCs at the Bar is 45-54 years 23% while the largest age group of pupils is 25 to 34 years 41%. Graph 9b: Core database: Age at the Bar (percentages) Source: Core Database (August 2013) Graph 9c shows a high number of practitioners did not disclose their age. 17% of the practising Bar, 56% of QCs and 44% of pupils did not disclose their age. Graph 9c: Core database: Age at the Bar (percentages) Source: Core database (August) 2013 3.6 Religion / belief Table 6 shows the numbers of QCs, practising barristers and pupils who reported their religion or belief.
AGGREGATES FOR SEALING WORKS TO: PANEL CONTRACTOR FAX NO.: CC DPI CLERK FAX NO.: 8999 4682 PROJECT: NAME OF PROJECT – AS PER SPEC PAGE 1 OF 1 WRITING DIRECTLY – ITP – DATE & REQUIRED: REASONABLE PERIOD CONTRACTORS – ENSURE TIMES FOR TESTING REFLECT THE ACTUAL PROPOSED COMPLETION TIME OF THE TO BE TESTED. THE – EASIER FOR EVERYONE ENSURE THIS IS – ENSURE THIS IS – ROAD OR AREA – TAKEN FROM CHAINAGES & Tests REQUIRED: TESTING IS TAKE PLACE ON SITE – WHAT MATERIALS ARE TO BE USED FOR SEALING - NO QUARRY RESULTS ARE TO BE ACCEPTED MINIMUM 3 SAMPLE TO BE TESTED ONCE YOU GET ABOVE 750 TONNE THEN 1 EXTRA TEST PER EVERY 250 TONNE TO BE USED (IE 1200 TONNE - 5 SETS OF TESTS REQUIRED) PSD – (MINIMUM 3) ALD – (MINIMUM 3) FI – (MINIMUM 3) CONTRACTOR: CONTRACTORS NAME CONTACT NO: CONTRACTORS PHONE No DATE & TIME: SENT FAX NO: AS ABOVE
Background – complete this section only if you did not adopt your dog from the Calgary Humane Society Where did you get your dog? If known background, why was the dog given up? What age was your dog when you adopted it? How long have you had the dog? Have you had any previous dog experience? Explain. Why did you choose this particular breed? Why did you choose this particular dog? Physical and Medical Issues Who is your veterinarian? Is the dog current on his/her vaccinations? Does the dog have any known medical problems? Is the dog on any type of medication? Does the dog have any food allergies? Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No When was the dog’s last veterinary exam? If yes, explain: If yes, specify and explain why: If yes, elaborate: Has your dog experienced any of the following conditions? deafness ear infections allergies seizures thyroid disease heart disease If yes to any of the above, please specify: What is your dog’s reaction to the vet? Consultation Objectives What would you most like to 1. change about your dog’s behaviour? Name at least 2. three things in order of importance. 3. Is the dog… housebroken? crate trained? What type of exercise does the dog receive? How often? Describe a typical day in the life of your dog. Afternoon: Evening: Night: What’s your dog’s favourite activity? What’s your dog’s
Instruction Manual RouteScan Charger Control Unit Charger Optical Cleaning Kit Target Pole (if purchased separately) Specification Weight - On (Control Unit) In Box 11kg 0.5kg 25kg Physical Dimensions - - On Track(RouteScan) In Box 1655 x 315 x265 mm Length:1755 mm Height:373 mm Width:385 mm Operating Temperature - -10°C to + 50°C (-4°F to 122°F) Environmental Rating - IP54 Life - - RouteScan Control Unit Up to 6 hours Up to 6 hours Operating System - PC Connectivity - USB Bluetooth Wireless LAN Getting Started Overview The RouteScan has been developed to provide quick, accurate structure clearance measurements relative to the Permanent Way. With the RouteScan in position on the track, the operator is able to control the measurement laser from a position of safety using the Control Unit, via a Bluetooth connection. The unit is lightweight (11kg) and is provided with a protective box for easy transportation to and from site. All data is displayed on a colour screen. The files can be opened and viewed in MS Excel.
The task board also groups by team members. Select the People grouping option in the top-right of the task board view. Figure Group tasks by people This view makes it easy to see what team members are currently working on and how much effort remains for each for the remainder of the current iteration. Figure Grouping tasks by people Click Backlog Items to return to the backlog portfolio for the team. Figure Backlog view Exercise 2: Agile Portfolio Management In this exercise, you will learn about some of the agile portfolio management capabilities provided by Team Foundation Server. These capabilities allow larger organizations to understand the scope of work across several teams and see how that work rolls up into broader initiatives. In this exercise, you will explore how multiple teams at Fabrikam Fiber can collaborate together to work on features. Task 1: Configuring Team Hierarchy and Area Paths Let’s start out by taking a look at the Fabrikam Fiber project from the top-down, in a manner that would typically be associated with a management role. Click the gear icon in the top-right corner of the web portal. This opens the administration pages in a new tab. Figure Loading administration site Navigate to the FabrikamFiber project node.
Knowledge and experience with Agile implementation, including but not limited to the following: Management of an Agile software development methodology; User Story management, sizing, and estimation method; Techniques for release planning; Plans for engaging end users; Methods for capturing and applying lessons learned, testing processes, reasons behind the composition of their Agile teams; Rationale behind the proposed development talent and project oversight (tied to Product Vision); How they will make resources available within schedule and budget constraints; and Approach to configuration management. This factor will be evaluated based on the above, to determine the extent to which the Offeror’s proposed approach will ensure successful implementation of the stated objectives. This factor will assess the Offeror’s overall approach to the project and what, if anything, it would need from the Government to ensure success as well as identifying any barriers that would reduce or delay success. Factor 2 – Past Performance/Prior Experience Offerors shall submit information for not more than five (5) distinct projects completed within the last 3 years that are similar in scope and complexity to this requirement which clearly demonstrate an understanding of and ability to meet the technical requirements expressed in this solicitation. In evaluation of past performance, the Contracting Officer can consider other sources beyond what is provided. Within the five permitted references, only three are allowed to be submitted for subcontractors. Preference may be given to Offerors who submit at least one example of past experience with agile software development. This factor assesses the Offeror’s experience performing work that is similar to the work to be performed under this Task Order. Consideration will be given to what aspects of an Offeror’s contract history provide the most confidence that the Offeror will satisfy the requirements described in this RFQ. This factor considers the quality of the Offeror’s performance on current or completed contracts and evaluates the Government’s level of confidence that the Offeror will be able to successfully accomplish this effort. The following points will be considered in assessing the Offeror’s ability to perform the Task Order successfully (confidence rating): Technical past performance: quality of product, analytical capability and capability to employ sound engineering practices; in particular, prior experience with projects where the Offeror was responsible for the following activities which are considered most relevant to success on this project:
features. Most teams felt there was flexibility to increase the story points based on higher efforts needed by QA to accomplish items such as compatibility testing and automation work. This was identified and discussed during estimation. Some groups are also using the squad approach. Many teams take on work outside of just QA. Discussed the pros/cons of adding stories into the sprint to cover no sprint activities such as training and other work or just reducing the capacity of the person thereby reducing the velocity. Key items that helped with estimation Involvement in the analysis prior to estimation (story time) Early prototypes providing a better feel for what they would be getting Up front risk assessment Well defined stories and acceptance criteria Understanding resource time (days off/work on other projects or non QA work) Issues that impact estimation Stories added after the sprint starts – change requests Lack of action being taken on retrospective feedback Incomplete details in stories One company (3 people in this group) kept a spreadsheet to track time for resources to understand estimates but this was done outside of tooling – manual effort The rest focus on team velocity. Automation was briefly discussed – the teams varied – some included within sprint others a sprint behind – but seems overall the preference was to move the work within the sprint.
feature management and big room planning Break 1400-1415 Paper Meal Workshop Interactive exercise about the implementation of scaled agile Scaling for delivery is all about proper planning and cadenced delivery Process Improve 60 min. 1415-1515 Break 1515-1530 Paper Meal Workshop Interactive exercise the implementation of scaled agile Scaling agile for delivery is all about proper planning and cadenced delivery Process Improve 30 min. 1530-1600 201 Review Review exercise results, out-brief to group, question and answer 30 min. 1600-1630 Closing Matthew Modarelli 1630
Parameters Traditional Approach – (Heavyweight) Agile Methodology (Lightweight) P1. Average Time to Complete [1] 6 years 3.2 years P2. Average Completion Rate [1],[3] 58% 52% P3. Average Cost of Tuition [4] 30K / Yr. 20K / Yr. P4. Learning Experience [1] Higher Learning – More Academic and theoretical than practical Somewhat newer doctoral experience P5. Admissions Criteria [1] Graduate Students with a Masters degree Senior computing professionals can join the DPS + 2 program P6. Predictive approach [2] Predictive and repeatable. Well established and mastered approach. Applicable to a wide selection of disciplines and subject matter. Typical Engineering approach. No surprises. Short planning sessions: As the dissertation process advances it is re-factored; parts can be discarded or changed and new stories written. P7. Comprehensive Documentation [2] More Less P8. Collaboration [1] Only when needed. Very important. Emphasis is
Sample Language on “The following requirements must be met in to fulfill the objectives of this task order and may be refined iteratively over the course of the effort to continuously meet specified user needs. Specifically, the contractor will provide the following tasks and services: Contractor shall coordinate with the government and [name of sponsoring organization] stakeholders to conduct end-user research on the [application name] and agency-user experiences and apply the research to inform application and content design and development. Contractor use plain language in application design and development, wherever possible. Work with GSA’s Office of Information Officer in order for the System to receive Authority to Operate [list technology stack options that are already approved]. Contractor shall select a technology stack that accomplishes the needs as stated in the objectives Contractor shall work with the government and [name of sponsoring organization] project teams to ensure that the system is compliant with interagency requirements and policies, to include security policies.” “As part of this purchased off of the Agile Blanket Purchase Agreement (aBPA), work will be conducted in two-week sprints and reviewed at the end of each sprint for acceptability and feedback“ OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS Personnel - Skills and Knowledge [Add specific skills and knowledge required here] Sample Language on Skills and Knowledge “The contractor shall provide qualified personnel with relevant experience and domain knowledge in line with this task's performance work statement, in terms of necessary skills at the requisite level of knowledge and experience. Broadly, a team assigned to build the [product name] is expected to have experience with: [List relevant domain here] e.g. building and testing web-based or mobile applications: user-centric design practices, usability testing, User experience design, Visual design, Specific code languages, Cloud deployment, Open-source login / authentication services, Agile and scrum methodologies, etc.” Both COR + Tech Lead need to coordinate with vendor on setting up development and test environment and access to accounts to kick off.”
Contract Administration [Add specific details here] Payment and Invoicing Procedures Content of Invoice [Add specific details here] Invoice [Add specific details here] Close-out Procedures [Add specific details here] Additional Resources Pricing Template Download the for sample language. Base Period (Date of post award conference – ## days after post award conference) CATEGORY LABOR HOURS GSA HOURLY RATE CEILING PRICE Project Lead Scrum Master Product Owner Lead Developer Option Period I LABOR CATEGORY LABOR HOURS GSA HOURLY RATE CEILING
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE (SOP) Agilent 1200 HPLC System for Sugar Analysis Purchased May 2010 Location: 2115, Pulp and Paper Labs Contact: Dr. Sunkyu Park (), 919-515-0473 To schedule training contact: Hui Chen (), 919-809-4751 Technical service: 1-800-227-9770 Sales Rep.: Tom Breeden (919) 466-2032 1. Preparation Equipment: the following colors are used to indicate the status of the module or instrument: Color Status Red Error Yellow Not ready Purple Pre-run, post-run Blue Run Light blue Injecting Green Idle Dark gray Offline Light gray Standby (for example, lamps off) Calibration standards: We are making up stock solutions of the following sugars: Glucose, xylose, galactose, and arabinose with mannose together An excel program (Linda’s HPLC standard sugar solution makeup) has the makeup and calculates the amounts needed to make up 6 calibration standards. The concentrations are kept constant. Place the 2 ml vials in the holder as follows: slot (1) is always Milli-Q water, followed by the standards in slots (2) – (7). Instrument 1 online: Turn on the five sections of the equipment, click on Instrument 1 online to set up for analysis.
Mid-Year Population Agincourt village, 2016 Age Group 2016 Male Female Total 0-4 339 343 682 5-9 365 383 748 10-14 340 351 691 15-19 312 349 661 20-24 361 343 704 25-29 397 388 785 30-34 334 297 631 35-39 246 222 468 40-44 181 188 369 45-49 120 152 272 50-54 120 138 258 55-59 87 129 216 60-64 72 96 168 65-69 44 64 108 70-74 30 56 86 75-79 34 42 76 80-84 8 18 26 85-89 9 52 61 90-94 2 16 18 95+ 3 4 7 Total 3 404 3 631 7 035 You can compare the population structure between Agincourt village and the Agincourt HDSS research site (1994 and 2016) by looking at the population pyramids below. Take home message: The number of households in Agincourt village has increased since
6 Try to read a: *Recipe book *Dictionary Put on the googles and try to read: *A recipe from the All About Vegetarian cooking *Find the number and address for Rochester Family Eye Clinic *Find “Gratitude” in the dictionary Write your findings for the phone book and definition of gratitude: 7 Pick things up from the Spread out 20 objects on the floor (playing cards, pasta, popcorn, etc.) Try to pick up all 20 objects Make sure to have your partner time you Put on the gloves Try picking up all 20 objects Make sure to have your partner time you How long did this task take without the gloves? How long did this task take with gloves? Insight about the experience: 8 Carry objects Carry 5 medical terminology books down the hallway Put the aging suit on, use your cane and now carry the five books down the hallway Have your partner time you for both experiences How long did this task take without the aging suit? How long did this task take with the aging suit? Insight about the experience (think about carrying grocery’s into a house, carrying laundry baskets full of clothes): 9 Pour food Pour the noodles and popcorn from one cup to the other 10 times With the gloves and glasses on try to pour the noodles and popcorn from one cup to the other 10 times Insight about the experience (think about preparing meals): 10 Read things: *The board *A map Put on the googles and try to read what is written on the board and the map, try to find the cities on the map the are listed on the board Insight about the experience (think about driving): 11 Balance Check your balancing abilities by first standing on two discs, next try to balance on just one foot, then try balancing on one foot on the discs. Next, put the aging suit on and try all three tasks again. Remember to have your partner time you for all 6 challenges. Insight about the experience: