2. No schools is run in rented building. 2. Out of 25 schools 18(72%) schools have pucca building, 05(20%) schools have semi-pucca building and in case of remaining 02 schools which are newly upgraded high schools the school buildings are under construction. 2. No schools is run in rented building. 3. 4(16%) schools building have cracks, 3(12%) have seepages and 4(16%) schools building have damages in plaster. 3. Out of 25 schools, 05(20%) schools have cracks in their building, 02(8%) schools have dampness, 07(28%) schools have seepages and 03(12%) schools have damages in plaster in the building. 3. 3(12%) schools building have cracks, 4(16%) have seepages and 4(16%) schools building have damages in plaster. 4. Lighting facility is available in 22(88%) schools. 4. In all the schools there is provision of natural light and cross ventilation in the class room. Further there is arrangement of lighting facility in the class rooms of all the 25(100%) schools. 4. Lighting facility is available in 24(96%) schools. 5. All 25(100%) schools do have sources of drinking water. 5. In case of 08(32%) schools ramps are there at the entrance of the schools, ramps to toilets are available only in 03(12%) schools. 5. All 25(100%) schools do have sources of drinking water. 6. Toilets in adequate number for boys exist in 16(64%) schools, for girls in 21(84%) and for teachers in 25(100%) schools. 6. In case on 10(40%) schools there is provision of supply water and in all the 25 schools (100%) tube wells are there. 6. Toilets in adequate number for boys exist in 18(72%) schools, for girls in 22(88%) and for teachers in 25(100%) schools.
INDEX S. No. Particulars Page no. 1. Planning & Implementation At School level At District level At State level 18-23 2. Access Physical Access Social Access Open Schooling OoSC 23-23 3. Equity General Information Girls Education 33-38 4. Guidance & Counselling At school level 38-39 5. Quality Enabling conditions Teaching learning process Teachers’ training 39-49 6. Civil works General Information Design Schools with ongoing construction activity 49-64 7. Community Mobilization/Participation At school level 64-67 8. MIS (Management Information System) At School, DPO, SPO level 67-70 9. Financial Management At SMDC, DPO, SPO level 70-76 10. School annual grant (SAG) At SMDC, DPO, SPO level 77-78 11. Minor Repair Grant At SMDC, DPO, SPO level 79-80 12. Innovations At DPO, SPO level 80-81 13. MMER (Management /Monitoring/Evaluation and Research) Staffing pattern At DPO, SPO level Monitoring strategy at DPO, SPO level Management systems DIET, SCERT, DEO Office State Database Research 81-87 14. Any other issues 87-87 15. Annexure-A : Name and Category of schools visited 88-88 16. Annexure-B: Visits of school located in a Higher Distance and Barriers in the way to school 89-89
3. Whether above schemes ensure convergence with provisions of RMSA? 1. Yes 2. No 01 Comments: Various Welfare schemes for SC, ST, Minorities, Girls, CWSN are available in the State for their education. 4. Any overt or covert, manifest or subtle discrimination against Students of any social group or community by the teachers or peers is observed in School, and the efforts made to minimize it. No. of Schools Discrimination No discrimination By teachers By peers 0 0 25 % 0 0 100 Comments: There is no any overt or covert, manifest or subtle discrimination against students of any social group or community by the teachers or peers is observed in any school visited by MI. Efforts made to minimize discrimination N.A. Comments: N.A. 5. Do the overall conditions prevalent in Schools facilitating access of CWSN to secondary Schools. If not, the details of obstructions and barriers. Number of Schools providing following facilities for access of CWSN – Facility Number of Schools % Proper ramps with hand rail 11 44 Western toilet seat 3 12 Special furniture in classroom 0 0 Tricycle 0 0 Escort 0 0 Other (Specify) 0 0 If the prevailing conditions in School do not facilitate access of CWSN to School State the obstructions and barriers. Obstructions : Lack of proper infrastructural facilities in the schools. Barriers : Lack of special furniture in classroom and lack of special toilets for CWSN and ramp. Comments: In 11(44%) schools do have ramps with handrails and in 3(12%) schools have western toilet seat for CWSN children.
2(c-g) h. Number of visits per School of Technical persons and authentication done or instructions given on construction site – No. of through SMDC in process Sub A/c Books Civil Work updated MB for Civil Work made to in with MB is in line with stock issue Quality up to the mark Physical existence of material matches with entry made in stock register work No No No Yes No A. % Total Number of Schools with ongoing civil work in district – 8 level No. of of visits Average No. of No. of made Average No. of given in No. of Schools Not N.A. Plinth Lintel Roof level Flooring Finishing Comments: - The civil works responsibility entirely assigned to Rural Development Department of Govt. of Odisha. SMDCs have not role in these aspect. (i) System of fund flow from District to the accounts of SMDC Mode of transfer Cheque Draft E-transfer Dates of receipt of fund No. of Schools N.A. % Comments: N.A. . N
4. Participation of SMDC members in preparation of AWP&B – No. of Schools Preparation of AWP & B Yes No 25 0 % 100 0 Comments : All the 25(100%) SMDCs participated in preparation of AWP & B. 5. Training received by SMDC members and duration thereof – No. of Schools SMDC members received training Total No. of SDMC members No. of members who received training Average of training duration in days Yes No 425 317 3days 25 0 % 100 0 100 74.58 Comments : The SMDC members have been oriented for 3days. Out of 425 members SMDC members 317(74.58%) members have been oriented by District office. 6. Schedule of trainings, received by SMDC members, name agency who conducted the trainings, and perception of SMDC members about trainings. Month and year of training held Trainings conducted by Responses about perception of SMDC members regarding trainings Topic, Content, Methodology projection April-2014 1.DEO No. of Schools Good & Useful Average Not Good 2. 3. 25 0 0 4. % 100 0 0 5. Comments : The District Education Office in April, 2014 conducted training for SMDC members. All the 25(100%) SMDCs respond that the SMDC training is good and useful for them. 8. MIS (Management Information System) at SPO, DPO and School level 1. Preparation of Master List of all Schools including private in District/State Name of District visited SAMBALPUR Master List of govt. and Pvt. Schools Prepared If master list not prepared reasons thereof Yes No 1. 25 0 2. Name of State Odisha 100 0 3.
4(i) If Yes, Details of action research carried out at district level – Areas of research Problem No. of Action Research conducted in district Solution Conducted by (Teachers /external agencies) Pedagogy N.A. Quality 4(ii) If Yes, Details of action research carried out at State level – Areas of research Problem No. of Action Research conducted in district Solution Conducted by (Teachers /external agencies) Pedagogy N.A. Quality 14. Any other issues relevant to RMSA implementation 1. For training of SMDC members special fund may be allocated so that all the SMDC members may be oriented about their roles and responsibilities. 2. For opening of guidance and counseling cell at school level separate fund provision should be made in AWP & B. 3. For major repairing of old school building provision of fund may be made in AWP & B. 4. Unit cost of toilets and drinking water facility may be enhanced to meet the escalating cost of materials and constructions. 5. Minor repairing grant may be approved for 2015-16 budget.
Visits of school located in a Higher Distance and Barriers in the way to school Sl. No. Name of the school No. of students coming Distance Natural /Manmade Barrier 1 Govt. High School, Mahamadpur 30 5-6 Kms. Railway Level Crossing 2 Panchayat High School, Jamankira 25 7-8 Kms. - 3 Govt. High School, Badsahir 40 6-7 Kms. Forest 4 Govt. UG High School, Godloisingh 22 6-7 Kms. Forest 5 Govt. High School, Jujumura 35 7-8 Kms. - INDEX S. No. Particulars Page no. 1. Planning & Implementation At School level At District level At State level 91-96 2. Access Physical Access Social Access Open Schooling OoSC 96-107 3. Equity General Information Girls Education 107-111 4. Guidance & Counselling At school level 112-112 5. Quality Enabling conditions Teaching learning process Teachers’ training 113-122 6. Civil works 123-138
2.(a) Class-wise, Social Category-wise enrollment and attendance (on the day of field visit) Class SC ST Minority Gen & Others Total CWSN B G total B G total B G total B G total B G total B G total E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P 9 1243 696 1302 947 2545 1643 10 1278 749 1319 929 2597 1678 Total 600 352 673 494 1273 846 393 203 419 262 812 465 28 09 42 21 70 30 1500 881 1487 1099 2987 1980 2521 1445 2621 1876 5142 3321 02 02 - - 02 02 % 11.66 13.08 24.75 7.64 8.14 15.79 0.54 0.81 1.36 29.17 28.91 58.09 49.02 50.97 100 *B-Boy, G-Girl, E-enrolled, P-present Comments :
9 Avg. % of Attend. 59 73 52 63 32 50 100 NIL Appeared in Exam 592 670 388 414 21 38 02 NIL % 98.6 99.5 98.7 98.8 75 90 100 NIL Above 60% 93 110 92 108 11 16 0 NIL % 15.5 16.34 23.4 25.7 39.2 38 0 NIL Below 60% 507 563 301 311 17 26 02 NIL % 84.5 83.6 76.6 74.3 60.8 62 100 NIL Comments: 2. Details of specific schemes available in the State for ensuring enrollment of special category Students along with the assistance provided there under? Name of schemes SC 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Name of schemes ST 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Name of schemes Minority 1. 2. Name of schemes Girls 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Name of schemes CWSN 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Category-wise (SC/ST/Minority/CWSN) dropout students in past one year i.e .2012-13
10. Individualized Educational Plan (IEPs) prepared for CWSN . No. of Schools with CWSN IEP Prepared Not prepared % Comments: 11. Availability of adequate facilities for seating CWSN – % Total No. of sampled Schools No. of Schools with CWSN in samples No. of Schools No. of Schools with CWSN seating facilities Yes No % Comments: . 12. Extent and nature of use of ICT devices for teaching and learning of the CWSN. Equipments No. of Schools having Facilities No. of Schools with CWSN having these facilities No. of Schools making use of ICT % LCD Projector Overhead projector Computer & Accessories with net connection Others Comments: III. Teachers’ Training 1. Provisions for Training of Teachers S. No. Provisions for In-service training Schedule Duration 1 Induction training (Science, Mathematics, English, `Social Science, For newly recruited teachers 10 days training programme based on NCF. 2005,
6. CIVIL WORKS I. General Information at School Level (1-2) S.N. Name of School Year of establishment Year of construction Remarks 1 George High School, Bargarh 1914 2 Govt. Girls High School, Bargarh 1959 3 Samaleswari High School, Ambapali 1980 2014 4 R.B. High School, Padampur 1944 2000 Renovated 5 Govt.Girls High School, Padampur 1966 2012 6 Govt. Boys High School, Barpali 1944 2003 Renovated 7 Govt.Girls High School, Barpali 1964 1982 8 Govt.Girls High School, Attabira 1965 1985 9 Gandhi Memorial High School, Kalapani 1976 1980 10 Cement Nagar High School, Bardol 11 Janata High School, Godbhoga 1970 1974 12 Kamgaon High School, Kamgaon 1955 13 Bhatli High School, Bhatli 1959 14 Kedarnath Adivasi High School, Ambabhana 1984 15 Govt. High School, Ghess 1960 1960 16 Govt. UGHS, Pandakipali 2008 Under Construction RMSA Model 17 Govt. UGHS, Lebidi 2008 Under Construction RMSA Model 18 Govt. High School, Sohela 1954 1960 19 Govt. High School, Melchamunda 1962 20 G.M. High School, Dahita 1979 1983 21 Deoli High School, Sativata 1976 1978 22 Barikel High School, Barikel 2081 23 Paikmal High School, Paikmal 1960 24 Palsada High School, Palsada 1981 ` 25 Govt. High School, Sarandapali 1962 2010 Comments :
(e) Lavatories’ single pits/double pits attached with septic tank and cleaning of septic tank No. of Schools Connectivity of lavatories with Single Pit/Double Pit Lavatories with Septic Tank Regular cleaning of septic tank Yes No Yes No 23 02 16 09 % 92 08 64 36 Comments: 12. Drainage System (a-c) Availability of drainage facility No. of Schools Drainage System available Yes No 10 15 % 40 60 Type of Drains Under ground Pucca Covered Pucca & Open Kutcha & Open No. of Schools NIL NIL 7 03 % - - 28 12 Structural Condition Good Bad Damaged Regular Cleaning of drains done in Schools No. of Schools 03 04 - 07 % 12 16 - 100 Any instance of Water Logging No. of Schools Yes No NIL % - No. of Schools If, yes, location of Water Logging Wrecked Drains Entrance Gate Open Space Playground Near Toilets Outside Classrooms/Lab/Lib/Kitchen % Comments: 13. (a-c) Waste Water treatment/discharge/disposal of solid waste No. of Schools Waste Water Treatment & Discharge Arrangement Yes No 25 100 % If yes, Type of drainage system
2(c-g) h. Number of visits per School of Technical persons and authentication done or instructions given on construction site – No. of Schools Community members through SMDC involved in procurement process Sub Committee (Construction Committee) Constituted A/c Books Civil Work (Construction) maintained/ updated MB for Civil Work Maintained Payment made to contractor in accordance with MB Material stocked is in line with stock register Cheque issue register maintained Quality up to the mark Physical existence of construction material matches with entry made in stock register Material work Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No % Total Number of Schools with ongoing civil work in district – Construction level No. of Schools Number of visits Average No. of visit/School No. of Authentications made Average No. of Authentication Instructions given in No. of Schools Recorded Not recorded Foundation Plinth Lintel Roof level Flooring Finishing Comments: -
3(ii) Level of participation of SMDC members in helping School authorities to conduct following activities No. of Schools Level of Participation RMSA & MDM Implementation % Construction work under RMSA % SAG Utilization % Free Text Books distribution % Scholarships distribution % Preparing AWP & B % Students Enrollment, Attendance % Regularity of teachers % Running of day to day activities organising School & cultural events % Help in provide ng School facilities % Filling of DCF % Good 12 48 N.A 14 56 16 64 14 56 10 40 16 64 14 56 14 56 16 64 10 40 Average 10 40 N.A 08 32 07 28 08 32 11 44 07 28 08 32 08 32 07 28 11 44 Bad 03 12 N.A 03 12 02 08 03 12 04 16 02 08 03 12 03 12 02 08 04 16 Comments : The level of participation of SMDC members in helping school authorities was found to be satisfactory in the district. During field visit members of MI interacted with the members of SMDCs and found them highly enthusiastic.
Status of receiving of DCF duly filled up from all Schools in the district for the current year i.e. 2013-14 (At district level) Total no. of Schools in the district No. of Schools to which DCF distributed through nodal Schools No. of Schools from which filled up DCF received No. of Schools from which filled DCF not received Reasons for not delay Govt. Pvt. Total Govt. Pvt. Total Govt. Pvt. Total 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Govt. Pvt. % Comments: All the schools visited have submitted the filled in DCF to DPO for 2014-15 in time. 5. Availability of Copy of filled up DCF with School for record and reference (At School level) No. of Schools Copy of filled up DCF available Reasons of Non-availability of o/c of DCF Yes No 1. - 25 - 2. - % 100 - 3. - Comments: 6-7 School report card and sample checks Data entry done School report card generated Sample checking being done Yes No Yes No Yes No 25 - 25 - - - School report card distributed to no. of Schools Finding of sample check % 100 Data entry done School report cards Sample checking School report cards distributors all School Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Name of district Name of State Overall finding of sampled checking
7. Social Auditing Display of financial Information on notice board/wall of the School/office for the purpose of social audit- No. of Schools Display of financial information (receipts & payments) and timely entered Yes No NIL % NIL D.P.O. Comments : The practice of social audit is not found in any school of the district. 8. Any instance of community mobilizing resources for the School. No. of Schools Instance of community mobilizing resources Yes No NIL - % - - If yes, details thereof Comments : 9(i). Status of utilization certification and period for which it has been Submitted from SMDC to DPO. S. No. Name of School Month of submission of UC Financial year for which UC is submitted 1 George High School, Bargarh - - 2 Govt. Girls High School, Bargarh - - 3 Samaleswari High School, Ambapali - - 4 R.B. High School, Padampur - - 5 Govt.Girls High School, Padampur - - 6 Govt. Boys High School, Barpali Not received any grant 7 Govt.Girls High School, Barpali - - 8 Govt.Girls High School, Attabira - - 9 Gandhi Memorial Girls High School, Kalapani - - 10 Cement Nagar High School, Bardol - - 11 Janata High School, Godbhoga - - 12 Kamgaon High School, Kamgaon March, 2015 2014-15 13 Bhatli High School, Bhatli - - 14 Kedarnath Adivasi High School, Ambabhana - - 15 Govt. High School, Ghess - -
19 Govt. High School, Melchamunda Rs. 50,000/- Dec. 2014 50% 20 G.M. High School, Dahita Rs. 50,000/- Dec. 2014 50% 21 Deoli High School, Sativata Rs. 50,000/- Dec. 2014 100% 22 Barikel High School, Barikel Rs. 50,000/- Dec. 2014 50% 23 Paikmal High School, Paikmal Rs. 50,000/- Dec. 2014 50% 24 Palsada High School, Palsada Rs. 50,000/- Dec. 2014 50% 25 Govt. High School, Sarandapali Rs. 50,000/- Dec. 2014 50% Total Rs.11,50,000/- 2(ii) Status of Utilization of School Annual Grant Details/No. of Schools Which were not sanctioned SAGs Which were sanctioned but did not receive SAGs Which received but did not spend. 2(iii) Utilization of SAG as per norms SAG funds utilized on works Number of Schools % Funds utilized as per norms in number of Schools If not utilized as per norms, give reasons Yes % No % Enriching school resources - 1. Development of Library 23 92 23 92 - - 2. Contingency expenses 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. 6. 6. 7. 7. 8. 8. 9. 9. 10. 10 Comments :
2 (ii) Utilization of minor repair grant as per norms Minor Repair Grant utilized on works Number of Schools % Funds utilized as per norms If not utilized as per norms, give reasons Yes % No % 1. 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. 6. 6. 7. 7. 8. 8. 9. 9. 10. 10 Comments: 12. INNOVATIONS – At SPO/DPO level No innovation at SPO / DPO level were found. 1. Details of innovative proposals undertaken during the current financial year (At district level) S. No. Name of Innovative Proposals Amount of funds sanctioned/released Stage of Implementation 2. Details of innovative proposals undertaken during the financial year 1st April, 2012 to 31st March, 2013 (At State level) S. No. Name of District Name of Innovative Proposals Amount of funds sanctioned/released Stage of Implementation
Quality 4(ii) If Yes, Details of action research carried out at State level – Areas of research Problem No. of Action Research conducted in district Solution Conducted by (Teachers /external agencies) Pedagogy Quality 14. Any other issues relevant to RMSA implementation 1. For training of SMDC members special fund may be allocated so that all the SMDC members may be oriented about their roles and responsibilities. 2. For opening of guidance and counseling cell at school level separate fund provision should be made in PAB. 3. For major repairing of old school building provision of fund may be made in PAB. 4. Unit cost of toilets and drinking water facility may be enhanced to meet the escalating cost of materials and constructions. 5. Minor repairing grant may be approved for 2015-16 budget.
Annexure- B Visits of school located in a Higher Distance and Barriers in the way to school Sl. No. Name of the school No. of students coming Distance Natural /Manual Barrier 1 2 3 INDEX S. No. Particulars Page no. 1. Planning & Implementation At School level At District level At State level 165-170 2. Access Physical Access Social Access Open Schooling OoSC 170-180 3. Equity General Information Girls Education 180-185 4. Guidance & Counselling At school level 185-186 5. Quality Enabling conditions Teaching learning process Teachers’ training 186-195
No. of Schools SMDC members are clear about their roles Not clear % S.N. Steps taken by SMDC members accordingly Number of Schools % 1 Ensuring education facility to dropout Students 0 0 2 Making society aware of child rights & duties of teachers& parents 7 28 3 Organizing parents teachers meetings, distribution of report card and reviewing C.W./H.W. 7 28 4 Keeping check on private tuitions by teachers, paying attention to academic progress of students 15 60 5 Identification of CWSN & taking care of availability of facilities to CWSN students 0 0 6 Paying attention to improvement in regular teaching learning activities. 17 68 7 Distribution of free text books 0 0 8 Availability of scholarships on time to students 11 44 9 Preparing three years’ perspective Plan 0 0 10 Proper use of funds i.e. SAG & other grants as per norms 25 100 11 Monitoring of minor & major repair work and maintenance of physical infrastructure 10 40 12 Seeking knowledge and information about income and expenditure of SMDC and supervising the accounts thereof. 12 48 Reasons of ignorance of SMDC members regarding their roles : The new SMDC members were not being oriented about their roles and responsibility. Comments : The SMDCs members in the district were clear about their roles so far as use of RMSA funds in 25(100%) SMDCs, paying attention to improvement in regular teaching learning activities in case of 17(68%) SMDCs and availability of scholarships in time to students in 11(44%) SMDCs. Details of various other aspects, looked after by SMDCs of schools are being given in above table. 8.1 Meetings of General Body of School Management and Development Committee- Meetings of General body held Number of Schools Quarterly Half Yearly Annually No meeting held till date 17 8 0 0 % 68 32 0 0 Comments : Meeting of general body of SMDCs have been organized quarterly in 17(68%) schools and half yearly in 8(32%) schools.
Minority 27 1.03 21 0.90 48 0.97 General 1618 62.19 1498 63.50 3116 62.80 Total 2602 100 2359 100 4961 100 1. (b) If data of category-wise population of Students of age group 14-16 years is not available then approximation of families of various categories residing in habitation of Schools - Category No. of Schools responded % SC Not Applicable ST Minority General All Categories Comments : So far as population pattern of habitation of sampled schools is concerned, 30.38% SC students, 5.85% ST students, 0.97% Minority students and 62.80% General Category students were studying. (c ) Share of SC,ST, Minority, and BPL families’ Girls-boys in enrollment is proportionate to their share in population of the habitation/neighborhood or not. No. of Schools Proportionate Yes No 25 0 % 100 0 If not, reasons thereof ……………………………………………………………………… Comments : In case of all the 25(100%) sampled schools the share of SC, ST, Minority students in enrolment is proportionate to their estimated share in population of the habitation catered to.
6. CIVIL WORKS I. General Information at School Level (1-2) S.N. Name of School Year of establishment Year of construction Remarks 1 MR High School, Sonepur 1913 1935 2 Govt. Girls High School, Sonepur 1963 1972 3 Govt. Girls High School, Tarbha 1962 2006 4 Govt. Boys High School, Tarbha 1955 1974 5 Govt. High School, Binka 1959 1974 6 Govt. High School, Khari 1977 1984 7 Kushaleswar High School , Dunguripali 1966 1978 8 Govt. High School, Dunguripali 1965 1970 9 Govt. Girls High School, S.Rampur 1984 2013 10 Govt. High School, S.Rampur 1959 1964 11 Panchayat High School, Beheramal 1978 1984 12 Govt. High School, Kartang 1973 1982 13 Govt. High School, Seledi 1983 1988 14 B.B. High School, Sankara 1977 1985 15 Govt. High School, Birmaharajpur 1962 1971 16 P.S. Girls High School, Birmaharajpur 1984 1996 17 Raghunath High School, Mursundhi 1966 1976 18 Panchayat High School, Luthurpank 1966 1976 19 Panchayat High School, Dharmasala 1972 1972 20 Jawahar Academy- Jaloi 1965 1972 21 SJ Academy –Kotsamlai 1982 2000 22 Govt. U.G. High School, Khyamaloi 2008 2013 23 SN High School, Sibtala 1980 2013 24 Govt. High School, Kamsara 1978 1986 ` 25 Govt. High School, Sargaj 1964 1984 Comments : The details of information about the year of establishment and construction are given in the above table.
No. of Schools % No. of Schools Availability of waste Collection facility Yes No 15 10 % 60 40 No. of Schools If yes, Adequate No. of dustbins Yes No 15 0 % 100 0 No. of Schools If yes, Condition of dustbins Usable Not usable 15 0 % 100 0 No. of Schools Availability of facility for treatment of waste Yes No 0 25 % 0 100 No. of Schools Facility for composting of organic waste Yes No 0 25 % 0 100 Comments: There is no waste water treatment in any of the sampled schools. Facility of waste collection exists in 15(60%) schools and dustbin also exists there. In no schools facility for treatment of waste and compositing of organic waste is available at present. 14. (a-b) Water & Energy Conservation Number of Schools Availability of Water Conservation Measures No Yes 0 % 0 Number of Schools Availability of Rain water harvesting system Yes No 0 25 % 0 100 Number of Schools Condition of Rainwater harvesting system Working Not Working N.A. N.A. % Number of Schools Stored water consumable Yes No N.A. N.A. %
3(ii) Level of participation of SMDC members in helping School authorities to conduct following activities No. of Schools Level of Participation RMSA & MDM Implementation % Construction work under RMSA % SAG Utilization % Free Text Books distribution % Scholarships distribution % Preparing AWP & B % Students Enrollment, Attendance % Regularity of teachers % Running of day to day activities organising School & cultural events % Help in provide ng School facilities % Filling of DCF % Good 10 40 7 28 16 64 15 60 18 72 6 24 13 52 18 72 11 44 4 16 4 16 Average 15 60 18 72 9 36 10 40 7 28 15 60 12 48 7 28 9 36 19 76 19 76 Bad 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 16 0 0 0 0 5 20 2 8 2 8 Comments : The level of participation of SMDC members with regard to various activities of school is given in the above table. Evidently their good level of participation seen on utilization of SAG grants scholarship distribution, student’s enrolment and attendance and Regularity of teachers. The average level of participation observed in RMSA and MDM implementation, construction work under RMSA, preparing AWP & B etc.
7. Social Auditing Display of financial Information on notice board/wall of the School/office for the purpose of social audit- No. of Schools Display of financial information (receipts & payments) and timely entered Yes No 0 25 % 0 100 D.P.O. Comments : Display of financial information has not been done in any 25(100%) sampled schools. 8. Any instance of community mobilizing resources for the School. No. of Schools Instance of community mobilizing resources Yes No 0 25 % 0 100 If yes, details thereof Comments : No instances of any community mobilization of resources for the schools have been observed by the monitoring team. 9(i). Status of utilization certification and period for which it has been Submitted from SMDC to DPO. S. No. Name of School Month of submission of UC Financial year for which UC is submitted 1 MR High School, Sonepur Oct.-Nov.2014 2013-14 2 Govt. Girls High School, Sonepur Oct.-Nov.2014 2013-14 3 Govt. Girls High School, Tarbha Oct.-Nov.2014 2013-14 4 Govt. Boys High School, Tarbha Oct.-Nov.2014 2013-14 5 Govt. High School, Binka Oct.-Nov.2014 2013-14 6 Govt. High School, Khari Oct.-Nov.2014 2013-14 7 Kushaleswar High School , Dunguripali Oct.-Nov.2014 2013-14 8 Govt. High School, Dunguripali Oct.-Nov.2014 2013-14 9 Govt. Girls High School, S.Rampur Oct.-Nov.2014 2013-14 10 Govt. High School, S.Rampur Oct.-Nov.2014 2013-14 11 Panchayat High School, Beheramal Oct.-Nov.2014 2013-14 12 Govt. High School, Kartang Oct.-Nov.2014 2013-14 13 Govt. High School, Seledi Oct.-Nov.2014 2013-14 14 B.B. High School, Sankara Oct.-Nov.2014 2013-14
10. Process of settlement of advance and collection of utilization certificate by SPO and DPO. (i) Process of settlement of advance and collection of utilization certificate. Not Available (ii) Communication to SMDCs after the settlement of advance has been done by DPO. 1. Yes 2. No 02 Mode of conveying SMDCs about settlement of advance. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comments : N.A. 11. Financial Statement for SDMC/DPO/SPO (From 1 April 12 to ………….. (date /month of visit). (i) Name of Unit A Opening Balance as on 1st April, 2013 B Funds received C=A+B Total Fund available till……… D Expenditure E=C+D Closing balance including cash in hand as on …….. Balance in bank passbook as on …………… SMDC N.A. DPO SPO Comments : N.A.