zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Annex I MB CONSUMPTION FOR QPS APPLICATIONS Country Latest consumption QPS (ODP tonnes) Argentina 2016 24.24 Brazil 2016 42.36 Chile 2016 25.86 China 2016 684.98 Costa Rica 2016 5.94 Dominican Republic (the) 2016 10.80 Egypt 2016 189.00 El Salvador 2016 133.82 Fiji 2016 7.68 Guatemala 2016 12.00 Honduras 2016 17.82 India 2016 708.52 Indonesia 2016 76.80 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 2016 13.20 Jamaica 2016 1.50 Jordan 2016 7.20 Kenya 2016 0.30 Kiribati 2016 0.01 Mexico 2016 296.60 Morocco 2015 5.40 Myanmar 2016 8.40 Nicaragua 2016 9.60 Pakistan 2016 40.62 Peru 2016 2.40 Philippines (the) 2016 14.30 Saudi Arabia 2015 9.00 Solomon Islands 2016 0.60 Sri Lanka 2016 13.07 Thailand 2016 94.44 Turkey 2016 0.02 Turkmenistan 2016 7.20 Uruguay 2016 12.89 Vanuatu 2016 0.24 Viet Nam 2016 510.74
5.0 PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION 5.1 General 1 Service Life (Years) (P) 5.2 Disinfection Performance 1 Disinfection Performance (P) 2 Validation Protocol () (S) UVDGM ONORM DVGW Other (specify) 4 3rd Party Responsible for Validation (S) 5 Limiting Operating Conditions to Maintain Validated Performance (S) Maximum flow rate (m3/hr) Minimum UVT (%) 5 EOLL and SF Factors used During Validation (S) EOLL factor SF factor 5.3 Pressure Rating and Pressure Drop 1 Pressure Rating (S) Steady state (bar) Maximum rate of change of pressure (bar/s) 2 Pressure Drop (bar) (P/S) Maximum allowable (P) Rated (S) 5.4 Life Cycle Costs 5.4.1 General 1 LCC Assessment Required using WIMES LCC Model 05 (Y/N) (P) 5.4.2 Energy Costs 1 Maximum Equipment Power Input (kW) (S) 5.4.3 Service Lives and Costs of Consumable Components 1 Guaranteed (G) and Expected (E) Service Lives of Components Component (P) Life (x 103 hrs) (S) Lamps (G and E) Ballasts (G and E) Sleeves (E) UVRI sensors (E) UVRI sensor windows (E) UVRI sensor window seals (E) Wiper rings (E) Wiper arm seals (E) Temperature sensors (E) Level sensors (E) Access flange seals (E) 2/3 Costs of Components (£)/Time Required to Replace Components (hrs) (S) Component Cost Time Lamps Ballasts Sleeves UVRI sensors UVRI sensor windows UVRI sensor window seals Wiper rings Wiper arm seals Temperature sensors Level sensors Access flange seals 6.0 DESIGN SPECIFICATION 6.1 General 6.1.1 General 6 Glass/Quartz Trap Required (Y/N) (P) 7 Facilities for Mercury Retention Reqd. (Y/N) (P) 8 Construction Strainer Required (Y/N) (P) 9 Facilities for Capture and Disposal of Untreated Water Required (Y/N) (P)
3 Type (Magnetic Flow Meter*) (P) 4 Reference for Particular Specification (P) 6.9 LV Assembly and Associated Electrical Installation 6.9.1 General 2 Assembly Configuration () (P) Standalone Part of a larger assembly 3 Reference for Particular Specification (P) 4 Type of Control System Required/Provided () (P/S) PLC based Micro-processor based 11 Ballast Type () (S) Electronic Electromagnetic 11 Ballast Voltages > 1000 V (Y/N) (S) 16 Maximum Heat Dissipated by the Assembly (kW) (S) 6.9.2 Operator Controls 3 Additional Operator Controls Required (P) 6.9.3 Local Indication of Operating Parameters 2 Additional Operating Parameter Indication Requirements (P) 6.9.4 Local Indication of Alarms and Status Signals 2 Additional Alarm/Status Information Indication Requirements (P) 6.9.5 Remote Control and Monitoring (Where Required) 6.9.5.1 Remote Control 1 Remote Control Requirements (P) 6.9.5.2 Remote Monitoring (e.g. via SCADA/Telemetry) 2 Additional Remote Monitoring Requirements (P) 4 Signal Output Requirements (i.e. Individual or Grouped) (P) 6.9.6 Data Acquisition and Recording on Site 2 Additional Data Acquisition and Recording Requirements (P) 7.0 CONTROL PHILOSOPHY 7.1 General 1 Dose Control Strategy () (P) Calculated dose Set point intensity 8.0 TEST SPECIFICATION 8.1 General 1b) Witness FAT Required (Y/N) (P) 9.0 TRAINING REQUIREMENTS 1 Operator Training Required (Y/N) (P)
The results of each of the specific issues and questions identified in the terms of reference of the study are presented below. Implementation issues All the countries in the sample, without exception, implemented the following activities: Licensing and quotas for the import or export of HCFC-containing equipment; Fiscal incentives for the import of equipment based on low-GWP refrigerants. Technical assistance programmes for the refrigeration servicing sector, with training programmes for technicians as the main standard bearer of the assistance to reduce ODS demand; Technical assistance programmes for the control of ODSs imports/exports, with the import/export licensing and quota systems and customs training as the most important initiatives for the reduction of ODS supply; and Supporting actions such as additional legislative and regulatory measures and public awareness, among others. Other measures commonly undertaken to control ODS demand included: Certification of refrigeration technicians after training; Establishment of codes of good practices for servicing of RAC equipment; Establishment of refrigerant recovery and recycling (R&R) schemes; and Establishment of refrigerant reclaiming centres, among others. These initiatives, however, are different for each country according to the degree of development of previous initiatives and to the specific characteristics of the country. Many countries have taken innovative approaches (including demonstration projects) that respond to their very individual needs or those of HCFC-consuming sectors. For instance: Brazil: “Training and standards for supermarkets and specific type of equipment”; Fiji: “Retrofit programme for fishing boats”; Ghana: “End-user incentive programme for the residential, commercial, industrial refrigeration and air-conditioning sectors”; The Islamic Republic of Iran: “Retrofit programme for fishing boats” in Fiji, the “Programme to promote leak-free supermarket installations”; Maldives: “Demonstration project for HCFC-free low-GWP alternatives in refrigeration in the fisheries sector”: Mexico: “HCFC-141b and HCFC22 cleaning agent phase-out in refrigeration service sector”; Nigeria: “Demonstration project for local production facility of refrigerant-grade hydrocarbons”; and
Annex I PROJECTS THAT ARE CLASSIFIED AS “SOME PROGRESS” AND ARE RECOMMENDED FOR CONTINUED MONITORING Country/project code Agency Project title China (CPR/ARS/56/INV/473) UNIDO Sector plan for phase-out of CFCs consumption in MDI sector Egypt (EGY/ARS/50/INV/92) UNIDO Phase-out of CFC consumption in the manufacture of aerosol metered dose inhalers (MDIs) Sudan (the) (SUD/FUM/73/TAS/36) UNIDO Technical assistance for the final phase-out of methyl bromide in the post-harvest sector Syrian Arab Republic (SYR/REF/62/INV/103) UNIDO Phase-out of HCFC-22 and HCFC-141b from the manufacture of unitary airconditioning equipment and rigid polyurethane insulation panels at Al Hafez Group
Paths Path coefficients Hypotheses Test results γ11 Customer relationship investment → Dependence 0.373*** H1a Supported γ21 Customer relationship investment → Trust 0.168* H3a Supported γ12 Social sticking → Dependence 0.374*** H1b Supported γ22 Social sticking → Trust 0.626*** H3b Supported γ13 Relationshi p end costs → Dependence 0.411*** H1c Supported γ23 Relationship end costs → Trust 0.107* H3c Supported γ14 Customer expertise → Dependence −0.282*** H1d Supported γ24 Customer expertise → Trust 0.089* H3d Supported β31 Dependence → Calculative loyalty 0.234*** H2a Supported β41 Dependence → Affective loyalty −0.413*** H2b Supported β32 Trust → Calculative loyalty −0.227*** H4a Supported β42 Trust → Affective loyalty 0.373*** H4b Supported *** p˂0.001. * p˂0.05. Table Moderating effects of interaction satisfaction Main effects Interaction satisfaction level Test of path coefficient growth Difference in χ2 value H Test results
Low (n=287) High (n=235) β coefficient β coefficient Dependence→Calculative loyalty 0.088 0.246 +0.158 52c.475*** H5a Supported Trust→Affective loyalty 0.239 0.363 +0.124 49.119*** H5b Supported ***p˂ 0.001
8. Three and Four Level Models EPSY 8268 Three-Level Models We can conceptualize three level models. Consider students within classrooms within schools: i = 1, 2, …, njk children within classroom j in school k, j = 1, 2, …, Jk classrooms within school k, k = 1, 2, …, K schools. The unconditional model is: Student-level model Variance within level Yijk = π0jk + eijk where eijk ~ N(0, 2) 2 /(2 + π + β) Classroom-level model π0jk = β00k + r0jk where r0jk ~ N(0, π) π /(2 + π + β) School-level model β00k = γ000 + u00k where u00k ~ N(0, β) β /(2 + π + β) Reliability of = π /(π + 2/njk) and reliability of Generalized models: Yijk = π0jk + π1jk a1ijk + π2jk a2ijk + … + πPjk aPijk + eijk with P student characteristics [a] where epjkl ~ MN(0, σ2). πpjk = βp0k + with Qp predictors [X] in the P + 1 level-2 equations p is the associated level-1 predictor q is the level-2 predictor where rpjk ~ MN(0, Tπ) βpqk = γpq0 + with Spq predictors in the Qp + 1 level-3 equations s is the level-3 predictor where upqk ~ MN(0, Tβ). Four-Level Models
HFC activities subtotal 4,899 5,885 2,140 12,924 0 Standard activities IS 4,305 2,069 4,304 10,678 0 Core unit 2,084 2,098 2,113 6,295 0 Standard activities subtotal 6,388 4,167 6,418 16,973 0 Grand total 63,426 42,648 50,256 156,330 188,421 * Including agency support cost where applicable. Performance indicators UNDP submitted performance indicators pursuant to decision 71/28 in its business plan narrative. After several discussions, UNDP and the Secretariat agreed on the targets as shown in Table 5. Table 5: Performance indicators for UNDP Type of indicator Short title Calculation 2018 target Planning--Approval Tranches approved Number of tranches approved vs. those planned* 23 Planning--Approval Projects/activities approved Number of projects/activities approved vs. those planned (including project preparation activities)** 43 Implementation Funds disbursed Based on estimated disbursement in progress report US $31,295,677 Implementation ODS phase-out ODS phase-out for the tranche when the next tranche is approved vs. those planned per business plans 756.2 ODP tonnes Implementation Project completion for activities Project completion vs. planned in progress reports for all activities (excluding project preparation) 4 Administrative Speed of financial completion The extent to which projects are financially completed 12 months after project completion 70% of those due Administrative Timely submission of project completion reports Timely submission of project completion reports vs. those agreed On time Administrative Timely submission of progress reports Timely submission of progress reports and business plans and responses unless otherwise agreed On time * The target of an agency would be reduced if it could not submit a tranche owing to another cooperating or lead agency, if agreed by that agency. ** Project preparation should not be assessed if the Executive Committee has not taken a decision on its funding. RECOMMENDATIONS The Executive Committee may wish: To note the UNDP business plan for 2018-2020 contained in document UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/80/18; and To approve the performance indicators for UNDP as set out in Table 5 of document UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/80/18.
Delegation of Board functions The Board shall agree the delegation of any of their functions to Committees and others, setting any conditions and restrictions it considers necessary and in accordance with any directions or regulations given by the Welsh Ministers. These functions may be carried out: by a Committee, sub-Committee or officer of the Trust (or of another Trust); or by another LHB; NHS Trust; Strategic Health Authority or Primary Care Trust in ; Special Health Authority; or with one or more bodies including local authorities through a sub-Committee. The Board shall agree and formally approve the delegation of specific executive powers to be exercised by Committees or SubCommittees which it has formally constituted. Delegation to officers The Board will delegate certain functions to the Chief Executive. For these aspects, the Chief Executive, when compiling the Scheme of Delegation to Officers, shall set out proposals for those functions they will perform personally and shall nominate other officers to undertake the remaining functions. The Chief Executive will still be accountable to the Board for all functions delegated to them irrespective of any further delegation to other officers. This must be considered and approved by the Board (subject to any amendment agreed during the discussion). The Chief Executive may periodically propose amendment to the Scheme of Delegation to Officers and any such amendments must also be considered and approved by the Board. Individual Executive Directors are in turn responsible for delegation within their own directorates/departments/localities in accordance with the framework established by the Chief Executive and agreed by the Board. COMMITTEES NHS Trust Committees The Board may and, where directed by the Welsh Ministers must, appoint Committees of the Trust either to undertake specific functions on the Board’s behalf or to provide advice and assurance to the Board in the exercise of its functions. The Board’s commitment to openness and transparency in the conduct of all its business extends equally to the work carried out on its behalf by Committees. The Board shall, wherever possible, require its Committees to hold meetings in public unless there are specific, valid reasons for not doing so. Use of the term ’Committee’ For the purposes of these SOs, use of the term ‘Committee’ incorporates the following: Board Committee sub-Committee unless otherwise stated. Sub-Committees
Terms of Reference – Audit Committee – Annex 1 to Schedule 3 Strategic Planning Committee – Annex 2 to Schedule 3 Quality Safety and Governance Committee – Annex 3 to Schedule 3 Remuneration Committee – Annex 4 to Schedule 3 Charitable Funds Committee – Annex 5 to Schedule 3 Welsh Ambulance Services Partnership Forum – Annex 6 to schedule 3 (Revised following changes endorsed at December 2013 Board) Audit Committee Terms of Reference & Operating Arrangements
driven and market smart, directing campus activities to have local impact and global reach, and developing alternative sources of revenue to fund strategic goals; and Whereas, this awardwinning scholar has a distinguished publication record in the area of interpersonal communication in both personal and professional settings and on issues of import to higher education leadership; and Whereas, prior to joining ACE, Jayne Marie Comstock served as chief academic officer at three different universities, including the role of provost and vice president for academic affairs at Butler University in Indianapolis, Indiana. As Butler’s provost, she facilitated the campuswide strategic planning process, cochaired a facilities master planning process, conducted comprehensive program reviews, inspired an entrepreneurial environment that encouraged the development of new academic programs, expanded international initiatives, and enhanced local partnerships, particularly with public schools; and Whereas, Dr. Comstock strongly believes in active participation in her community and demonstrates that commitment through membership in various organizations. These include board membership for Junior Achievement and the YMCA; active committee work for chambers of commerce, pet shelters, economic development initiatives, and her church; and work for various boards, commissions, and committees across the higher education landscape; and Whereas, at home, Jayne Marie Comstock and her husband, Larry A. Williamson, enjoy the companionship of Cocoa, their nineyearold Chesapeake retriever. With an extensive background in higher education administration as a former vice president for advancement, director of government relations, and executive director of a university foundation, Larry Williamson is himself an experienced educator. He has taught political science courses at several universities and served on the staff of a U.S. Congressman, and he retired from the U.S. Navy as a captain; and Whereas, the Senate takes great pleasure in extending a warm welcome to Dr. Jayne Marie Comstock and her husband, Larry Williamson, to their new home in the Palmetto State and at Winthrop University. Now, therefore,
(VI) PROJECT DATA 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Montreal Protocol consumption limits 17,342.1 17,342.1 17,342.1 17,342.1 12,524.9 12,524.9 12,524.9 12,524.9 12,524.9 6,262.4 6,262.4 n/a Maximum allowable consumption (ODP tonnes) 2,286.0 2,286.0 2,032.0 2,032.0 1,397.0 1,397.0 1,397.0 762.0 762.0 165.0 0.0 n/a Agreed funding (US $) UNIDO Project costs 7,514,867 8,732,614 8,000,000 9,243,486 9,600,000 14,788,765 11,400,000 11,300,000 9,550,000 9,600,000 11,971,763 111,701,495 Support costs 526,041 567,620 520,000 600,827 624,000 961,270 741,000 734,500 620,750 624,000 778,165 7,298,172 Germany Project costs - 267,386 356,514 211,235 250,000 - - 1,085,135 Support costs - 31,877 - 42,502 - 25,183 - - 29,804 - - 129,365 Funds approved by ExCom (US $) Project costs 7,514,867 7,514,867 Support costs 526,041 526,041 Total funds requested for approval at this meeting (US $) Project costs 9,000,000 9,000,000 Support costs 599,497 599,497 Secretariat's recommendation: For individual consideration
(VI) PROJECT DATA 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Montreal Protocol consumption limits 17,342.1 17,342.1 17,342.1 17,342.1 12,524.9 12,524.9 12,524.9 12,524.9 12,524.9 6,262.4 6,262.4 n/a Maximum allowable consumption (ODP tonnes) 2,162.5 2,162.5 2,042.4 2,042.4 1,609.9 1,609.9 * * * * * n/a Agreed funding (US $) UNDP Project costs 13,368,756 20,000,000 12,000,000 16,000,000 16,000,000 11,776,041 - - - - - 89,144,797 Support costs 935,813 1,300,000 780,000 1,040,000 1,040,000 765,443 - - - - - 5,861,256 Funds approved by ExCom (US $) Project costs 13,368,756 13,368,756 Support costs 935,813 935,813 Total funds requested for approval at this meeting (US $) Project costs 20,000,000 20,000,000 Support costs 1,300,000 1,300,000 * Maximum allowable total consumption of Annex C, Group I substances in the ICR sector for the period 2021 to 2026 would be determined later, but would in no case be greater than 1,609.9 ODP tonnes prior to 2025, and no greater than 781 ODP tonnes thereafter. Secretariat's recommendation: For individual consideration
6-5 Descriptor Privilege Level(DPL) Segment Privilege attributes 4 Segment Descriptor(S) S =1 Code or Data segment descriptor S =0 System Segment or Gate Descriptor 3 Executable(E) E = 0 Descriptor type is data segment E = 1 Descriptor type is code segment 2 Expansion Direction(ED) for data ED =0 Expand up(data) segment, offsets must be ≤ limit. ED =1 Expand down(stack) segment, offsets must be > limit. Confirming(C) when E=1 for code Code segment may only be executed when CPL ≥DPL and CPL remains unchanged. 1 Writeable (W) for data W = 0 Data segment are read only W = 1 Data segment may be written into. Readable (R) for code R = 0 Code segment may not be read(execute only) R = 0 Code segment may be read(execute/read) 0 Access Bit (A) A = 0 Segment has not been accessed A = 1 Segment has been accessed System Segment Descriptor Paging Paging is used for virtual memory multitasking operating system. Pages are fixed size portions of the program module or data The complete task need not be in physical memory at any time and only a few pages are required. Hence the remaining space can be allocated for other tasks and thus multitasking can be achieved Paging Organization Page Mechanism Intel386DX uses a two level table mechanism to convert linear address to physical address. There are 3 components in paging mechanism: Page Directory
The privilege levels are checked at the time a selector for the target segment is loaded into the data segment register. Three privilege levels enter into privilege checking mechanism CPL of the currently executing task RPL of the selector which specifies target segment DPL of the descriptor of the target segment Instructions may load the DS register only if the DPL of the target segment is numerically greater than or equal to the maximum of the CPL and selectors RPL. i.e. DPL of target segment ≥ max (CPL,RPL) A procedure can only access data that is at the same or less privilege level. Restricting Control Transfer Control transfer (except interrupts) are accomplished by JMP, CALL and RET instructions. The near forms of JMP and CALL transfer within current code segment and requires only limit checking The far forms of JMP and CALL refer to other segments and require privilege checking. The far JMP and CALL can be done in 2 ways: Without Call Gate Descriptor With Call Gate Descriptor Without Call Gate Descriptor The processor permits a JMP or CALL directly to another segment only if DPL of the target segment = CPL of the calling segment Confirming bit of the target code is set and DPL of the target segment ≤ CPL
w/c 21 November 2016 (Week 5) Focussed observation and completion of M&EF including profiling conference. Led by SM Led by UM Friday 25 November 2016 End of school experience. Reports should be completed electronically by this date and emailed together with an Excel export of the final online profile to the Partnership Office. Completed by SD/SDM with input from the student teacher Completed by UM with input from the student teacher
Quality Assurance Record – PGCE Placement 1 a) Checklist and Weekly Monitoring and Evaluation Record for School Based Tutors, School/University Mentor and University Visiting Tutor. (Copies of this QA record should be placed at the front of student teachers’ Practical Teaching Files). Observation Feedback Record Student teachers should be observed and have a feedback and learning conversation on a weekly basis. This is a minimum requirement but further focussed observations may be required or negotiated. Week Tutor (School Based Tutors, School Mentors, University Visiting Tutors/Mentors Monitoring & Evaluation Report Focussed Observation Feedback Given Initials Student Teacher’s initials Date Week 1 w/c 17 October Week 2 w/c 31 October Week 3 w/c 7 November Week 4 w/c 14 November Week 5 w/c 21 November
Form B: Declarations on Compliances ITT Reference: Invitation to Tender AO/1-8042/14/NL/KML. Subject: Advanced damage tolerance assessment methodology for composite structures. By submitting the present Form B as Annex to the cover letter of the tender reference [insert reference of your tender ………..] I/we the undersigned herewith officially declare that the tender is compliant with the following requirements as listed hereunder: Indicate : “Compliant” or “Partially Compliant“ or (in the last 2 cases give reference of the cover letter specific section containing detailed information on the matter and relevant cross references to the applicable parts of the offer) The information provided to ESA for registration as potential supplier (individually for all entities involved in the tender) has been updated in the last 12 months; With regard to the technical requirements of the ITT, the tender is: With regard to the managerial requirements of the ITT, the tender is: With regard to the financial requirements of the ITT, the tender is: With regard to the contract conditions of the ITT, the tender is: With regard to the IPR requirements (see section 8 of the proposal template and Article 6 of the draft contract), the tender is: With regard to the Export/Import requirements (see section 9 of the proposal template), the tender is:
2. When Conc. H2SO4 was added to an unknown salt present in a test tube, a brown gas (A) was evolved. This gas intensified when copper turnings were added in to test tube. On cooling gas (A) changed in to a colourless gas (B). (a)Identify the gases ‘A’ and ‘B’ (b)Write the equations for the reactions involved The gas ‘A’ is NO2 whereas ‘B’ is N2O4. XNO3 + H2SO4XHSO4 + HNO3 Salt (conc.) Cu + 4HNO3 (Conc.) Cu (NO3)2 + 2NO2 + 2H2O Blue Brown (A) 2NO2 (on cooling) N2O4 Colourless(B) 3. Arrange the following in the increasing order of the property mentioned. (i)HOCl, HClO2, HClO3, HClO4 (Acidic strength) (ii)As2O3, ClO2, GeO3, Ga2O3 (Acidity) (iii)NH3, PH3, AsH3, SbH3 (HEH bond angle) (iv)HF, HCl, HBr, HI (Acidic strength) (v)MF, MCl, MBr, MI (ionic character) Ans.(i)Acidic strength:HOCl<HClO2<HCIO3<HCIO4 (ii)Acidity: Ga2O3<GeO2<AsO3<CIO2 (iii)Bond angle: SbH3<AsH3<PH3<NH3 (iv)Acidic strength: HF<HCl<HBr<HI (v)Ionic character: MI<MBr<MCl<MF ASSIGNMENTS Very shot answer type questions: Which of NH3 and H3O+ has higher bond angle and why? Which of PH4I and PH4Cl is more stable and why? What is the basicity of H3PO3 and H3PO4?
Q4. How is 1-propoxypropane synthesised from propan-1-ol? Write mechanism of this reaction. ANS. 1-propoxypropane can be synthesized from propan-1-ol by dehydration. Propan-1-ol undergoes dehydration in the presence of protic acids (such as H2SO4, H3PO4) to give 1-propoxypropane. The mechanism of this reaction involves the following three steps: Step 1: Protonation Step 2: Nucleophilic attack Step 3: Deprotonation Q5. Write the equation of the reaction of hydrogen iodide with: 1-propoxypropane (ii) Methoxybenzene and (iii) Benzyl ethyl ether ANS. (i) (ii) (iii) 5 MARKS QUESTIONS Q1. Write equations of the following reactions: (i) Friedel-Crafts reaction−alkylation of anisole. (ii) Nitration of anisole. (iii) Bromination of anisole in ethanoic acid medium. (iv) Friedel-Craft‘s acetylation of anisole. (v)Reaction of phenol with Zn dust. Refer Textbook
Please explain the impact of the activities implemented on the participants and the partnership. Target groups: Please describe the direct impact and outreach of the project on the target groups/audience. Please specify as well who the target groups were and how the project addressed their needs. Please provide an overview of the project's results (including intangible or tangible outputs such as manuals, tools, etc.)? Do you think that your project produced results which will go beyond the sole interest of the partners and direct participants? YES NO Please explain how/why. Please explain what will be the long term impact of the project (beyond the remit of the project). Please explain as well how and why you think the project's results are sustainable. Evaluation: Did you perform a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the project’s results? YES NO If YES please give details on the evaluation performed, its methodology, its outcomes, indicators and explain if and how you used it to improve your project.
Please upload the results/products of your project (such as press releases, banners, posters or other type of material produced in the framework of your project) in the European Commission’s project database for the Creative Europe Programme (accessible here: ). Please explain if and how you disseminated the results of the project, as well as the experience and the knowledge acquired through the project. Do you think that the communication and dissemination strategy implemented in the framework of the project was successful? YES NO Please explain how/why and give concrete examples. Do you think that the project reached new audiences? YES NO Please explain how/why and give concrete examples. If you have developed an audience development strategy please explain the methodology and the results. QUALITY OF THE PARTNERSHIP Please describe the general organisation and coordination methodology of the project. Please detail as well the tools put in place to manage the consortium and to ensure cooperation among partners and their active involvement. Please provide a qualitative evaluation of the overall cooperation between the project leader and the partners.
Article 4 of the Draft Contract. All claims for payment, except the advance, shall be linked to the achievement of defined schedule milestones with tangible deliverables including as the case may be, achieved performance of service. Examples of such milestones are the satisfactory completion of WPs and delivery of the related output] [You are requested to indicate below for only information purposes, the Milestone Payment Plan that is envisaged for subcontractor(s) paid by/via the Contractor] Milestone (MS) Description Schedule Date Payments from ESA to Prime Contractor For Information: Payment amount to Contractor and Subcontractor(s) Contractor Subcontractor … Progress (MS 1): Upon successful completion of (TBD) and review and acceptance by the Agency of all related deliverables. To + … months Progress (MS 2): Upon successful Test Readiness Review and acceptance by the Agency of all related deliverables. Final Settlement (MS 3): Upon the Agency’s acceptance of all deliverable items due under the Contract and the Contractor’s fulfilment of all other contractual obligations including submission of the Contract Closure Documentation >15% of total price TOTAL Advance Payment(s) and other Financial Conditions: Prime (P) Company Name Vendor Code Advance Payment Euro Offset against Offset by Euro Condition (if applicable) P <15% MS 1 Amount Upon signature of the Contract by both Parties
PGCE Primary and PGCE Primary & Early Years Programmes Placement 2 Date Detail Associate Partnership Schools Teaching Partnership Schools Prior to placement start date Placement preparation meetings for student teachers on campus n/a n/a Prior to placement start date Personal preparation meeting with Professional Tutor on campus n/a n/a w/c 20 March 2017 (Week 1) School Experience begins Early Alert may be used until Friday 24 March School Mentor (SM) / School Direct Mentor (SDM) & School Based Tutor (SBT) meet with University Visiting Tutor (UVT) for a one hour briefing meeting in school. UVT gives written guidance to SBT Student teacher also to attend. UVT meets student teachers and conducts well-being and preparation check. School Based Tutor (SBT) meets with University Mentor (UM) for a one hour briefing meeting in school. UM gives written guidance to the SBT. Student teacher also to attend. UM meets student teachers and conducts well-being and preparation check. w/c 27 March 2017 (Week 2) Focussed observation and completion of Monitoring & Evaluation Form (M&EF) including profiling conference. Led by UVT Led by UM w/c 3 April 2017 Easter Holidays w/c 10 April 2017 Easter Holidays w/c 17 April 2017 (Week 3) Focussed observation Led by SBT Led by SBT w/c 24 April 2017 (week 4) Focussed observation and completion of M&EF including profiling conference. Interim Assessment Point for Planning (see page 12) Led by SM Led by UM w/c 1 May 2017 (Week 5) Focussed observation Led by SBT Led by SBT
w/c 8 May 2017 (Week 6) Focussed observation and completion of M&EF including profiling conference. Led by SM Led by UM w/c 15 May 2017 (Week 7) Focussed observation Led by SBT Led by SBT w/c 22 May 2017 (Week 8) Focussed joint observation and completion of M&EF including profiling conference. Cause for Concern should be issued no later than 26 May Jointly led by UVT Jointly led by UM w/c 29 May 2017 Half term Week Opportunities for campus based intervention and support for student teachers w/c 5 June 2017 (Week 9) Focussed observation Moderation Meeting by request Led by SBT Led by SBT w/c 12 June 2017 (Week 10) Focussed joint observation and completion of M&EF including profiling conference. Insufficient Progress should be issued no later than 16 June Jointly led by UVT Jointly led by UM w/c 19 June 2017 (Week 11) Focussed observation and completion of M&EF including profiling conference. Visits will be made by External Examiners Led by SM Led by UM w/c 26 June 2017 (Week 12) Focussed observation Led by SBT Led by SBT Friday 30 June 2017 End of school experience. Reports should be completed electronically by this date and emailed together with an Excel export of the final online profile to the Partnership Office. Completed by SD/SDM with input from the student teacher Completed by UM with input from the student teacher w/c 3 July 2017 Alternative School Experience (please refer to separate Notes of Guidance for this placement) Friday 7 July 2017 Final Conference for student teachers on Plymouth Campus n/a n/a
1 Noise/room misuse complaints from university staff Failure to manage funds appropriately to the detriment of the group I.e. raising a PO 2 Repeated noise/room misuse complaints from university staff Consented humiliation 3 Breaching Students’ Union Sponsorship contract Advertising external companies without agreement from the Students’ Union 4 Breach of Food Supply policy i.e. cooking hot food in a university room Destruction of property or facilities 6 Non consented humiliation i.e. initiations Bullying, intimidation or harassment of group member(s) or staff 9 Breach of External Speaker policy having received necessary training and/or information Misappropriating group funding for personal gain i.e. theft Non-Consented humiliation which displays lasting effects on the victim The list of possible offences above is not intended to be exhaustive, and should be updated annually once precedents have been set by panels at disciplinary hearings. Sanctions will be cumulative if an offence is repeated within an academic term as follows: Sanctions will multiply by 2x if the same offence is repeated. Sanctions will multiply by 3x if the same offence is repeated a third time. APPENDIX B Disciplinary Flow Chart
“(1) the ombudsman of the office of the Governor or the Governor’s designee Department of Children’s Advocacy; (21) the Division for the Review of the Foster Care of Children, Office of the Governor, for purposes of certifying in accordance with Section 63-11-730 that no potential employee or no nominee to and no member of the state or a local foster care review board is a subject of an indicated report or affirmative determination; (22) employees of the Division for the Review of the Foster Care of Children, Office of the Governor and members of local boards when carrying out their duties pursuant to Article 7 of Chapter 11; the department and the division shall limit by written agreement or regulation, or both, the documents and information to be furnished to the local boards; (23) the Division of Guardian ad Litem, Office of the Governor, for purposes of certifying that no potential employee or volunteer is the subject of an indicated report or an affirmative determination;” SECTION 13. Article 1, Chapter 3, Title 1 of the 1976 Code is amended by adding: “Section 1-3-60. The Governor shall designate, by executive order, the appropriate agency to administer the South Carolina Developmental Disabilities Council in accordance with the Federal Developmental Disabilities Act of 2000, Pub. Law 106-402. The Department of Administration shall provide such administrative support to the Developmental Disabilities Council as it may request and require in the performance of its duties, including, but not limited to, financial accounting support, human resources administrative support, information technology shared services support, procurement services, and logistical support.” SECTION 14. Section 1-11-10(A)(5) of the 1976 Code is deleted. SECTION 15. Article 11, Chapter 11, Title 63 of the 1976 Code is repealed. SECTION 16. Section 1-11-10(A)(8) of the 1976 Code is deleted. SECTION 17. The General Assembly finds that the sections presented in this act constitute one subject as required by Article III, Section 17 of the South Carolina Constitution, in particular finding that each change and each topic relates directly to or in conjunction
806.8.14 Example of a MDNR SWPPP Evaluation Form (Note: The following form is used by MDNR to evaluate project SWPPPs, including MoDOT projects. Notice in the “Comment” section it has been identified whether the items they are looking for are located within this written statewide SWPPP, need to be covered on the project specific erosion and sediment control plans (a.k.a., the site maps), or they should be found in both.)
5. APPLE IOS HISTORY OF IOS FEATURES HOMESCREEN DEVELOPMENT 6. APPLE IOS 4 Multitasking What’s new in ios4 Apple ios4’s hidden features IOS 4 IOS 4 for users IOS 4 and iphone 4 IOS 4 and enterprise 7. TECHNOLOGY BEHIND IOS 4 IOS technology layers Writing code for ios IOS 4 technically Inherited improvements 8.APPLE IOS REVIEW What’s new What’s missing 9.CONCLUSION
EIGHT, AND TO PROVIDE THAT THE TERM OF OFFICE OF THE AT-LARGE MEMBER APPOINTED BY THE GOVERNOR SHALL BE EFFECTIVE UPON CERTIFICATION TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE AND SHALL BE SIX YEARS; AND TO AMEND SECTION 59-121-30 OF THE 1976 CODE, RELATING TO THE ELECTION OF MEMBERS OF THE CITADEL BOARD OF VISITORS, TO PROVIDE THAT VACANCIES MUST BE FILLED IN THE SAME MANNER AS THE ORIGINAL APPOINTMENT FOR THE UNEXPIRED TERM, TO PROVIDE THAT, REGARDING ELECTIONS TO FILL VACANCIES OCCURRING DUE TO THE EXPIRATION OF TERMS OF BOARD MEMBERS REPRESENTING A CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY SHALL HOLD THE ELECTION NO EARLIER THAN THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL OF THE YEAR THE TERM EXPIRES AND AS NECESSARY TO FILL UNEXPIRED TERMS THAT ARE CAUSED BY THE DEATH, RESIGNATION, OR REMOVAL OF A MEMBER, AND TO PROVIDE FOR THE MANNER IN WHICH INITIAL TERMS SHALL BE FILLED. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina: SECTION 1. Section 59-121-10 of the 1976 Code is amended to read: “Section 59-121-10. The board of visitors of The Citadel, the Military College of South Carolina, shall be composed of the Governor, the Adjutant General and the State Superintendent of Education, who shall be members ex officio of the board, and eleven others who shall be graduates of the college, seven of whom are to be elected by joint vote of the General Assembly as hereinafter provided, three of whom are to be elected by such means and methods as may be determined by the Association of Citadel Men or any succeeding organization of Citadel men, the result of election to be certified by the president of the association to the Secretary of State, and one of whom shall be appointed by the Governor. The Governor shall make the appointment based on merit regardless of race or economic status and shall strive to assure that the membership of the board is representative of all citizens of the State of South Carolina. The board of visitors of The Citadel, the Military College of South Carolina, shall be composed of:
Species Size of Braincase FB SS Sagittal Crest (Y/N) Mastoid Process Flat or Protruding Nasal Bones Arched or Flat Length Mandible (cm) Width of 4 Incisors (cm) Protruding Canine (Y/N) Canine Diastema (Y/N) Combined Premolar and Molar (cm) Paranthropus boisei 13.2 11.0 Yes Protruding Flat 7.0 1.1 No No 3.9 Australopithecus afarensis 11.0 10.1 Yes Protruding Flat 5.8 1.4 No No 2.7 Pan troglodytes 9.9 10.2 Yes Flat Flat 6.2 1.4 Yes Yes 2.6 Gorilla gorilla 11.0 10.4 Yes Flat Flat 7.4 1.4 Yes Yes 3.7 Homo erectus 14.9 12.8 No Protruding Yes 5.0 1.1 No No 2.5 Homo neanderthalensis 16.8 14.9 No Protruding Arched 5.8 1.4 No No 2.2 Homo sapiens 16.6 15.0 No Protruding Arched 4.4 1.1 No No 2.0
Grants Years Investigator (Principal/,other) Granted by Institute/Company Total Amount 1996 Mona Boaz Tziporah Ayalon Foundation, 10,000 1996 Mona Boaz Office of the Chief Scientist, Ministry of Health Grant #3525 20,000 1998 Mona Boaz Office of the Chief Scientist Grant #4204 60,000 2001 Mona Boaz Office of the Chief Scientist Grant #4204, extension 60,000
Association, Madrid, Spain NDT 1999 Oxidative stress and CVD risk in hemodialysis patients. XXXVII Congress of the European Renal Association/European Dialysis and Transplant Association, Nice, France NDT 2000 Oxidative stress in cardionephrology. The 9th Assisi European Meeting on Cardionephrology, Assisi, Italy2002 Serum phosphorus and PVD risk in hemodialysis patients9 The XXXIX Congress of the European Renal Association/European Dialysis and Transplant Association, Copenhagen, Denmark, NDT 2002 Oxidative stress in the development of cardiovascular disease in end stage renal disease The 21st Annual Meeting of the International Society for Blood Purification, Connecticut, USA Journal of Blood Purification 2003 . American Diabetes Association 67th Scientific Sessions, Chicago, IL JADA 2006 Multidisciplinary workshop improves erectile performance in diabetic men with erectile dysfunction. American Diabetes Association 67th Scientific Sessions, Chicago, IL JADA 2006 American Diabetes Association 69th Scientific Sessions, New Orleans, LA JADA 2009 Obesity and gastroparesis in type 2 diabetic patients with neuropathy. 8th World Congress on Insulin Resistance, Cardiovascular Disease and Obesity, Los Angeles, CA. Endocrine Practice 2010
Technical report prepared for the Department of Land Affairs, Directorate of Monitoring and Evaluation, Pretoria. African National Congress. 1994. The Reconstruction and Development Programme: A Policy Framework. Johannesburg, South Africa: Umanyano. Bradstock, Alastair. 2005. Key Experiences of Land Reform in the Northern Cape Province of South Africa. London: FARM-Africa. Claassens, Aninka and Ben Cousins (eds). 2008. Land, Power and Custom: Controversies Generated by South Africa’s Communal Land Rights Act. UCT Press: Cape Town and Ohio University Press: Athens OH. Cousins, Ben. 2007. “More Than Socially Embedded: The Distinctive Character of ‘Communal Tenure’ Regimes in South Africa and its Implications for Land Policy”. Journal of Agrarian Change, 7(3), 2007, pp 281–315. Cousins, Ben and Hall, Ruth. 2011. Rights without Illusions:The Potential and Limits of Rights-Based Approaches to Securing Land Tenure in Rural South Africa. Working Paper 18. PLAAS, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa. Department of Agriculture. 2007. Abstract of Agricultural Statistics 2007. [accessed December 30, 2008]. Department of Land Affairs. 1997. “White Paper on South African Land Policy.” Pretoria. ---. 2004. “The A-Z of the Communal Land Rights Act, 2004 (Act No. 11 of 2004).” Pretoria. http://land.pwv.gov.za/tenurereform/. ---. 2005. “Delivery of Land and Agrarian Reform.” Report to the National Land Summit, Johannesburg, July 27–31. ---. 2007. Annual Report 2006/07. Pretoria. ---. 2008. Annual Report 2007/08. Pretoria. Department of Rural Development and Land Reform 2009. Annual Report 2008/09. Pretoria. ---. 2010. Annual Report 2009/10. Pretoria. ---. 2011. Annual Report 2010/11. Pretoria Derman, Bill, Edward Lahiff, and Espen Sjaastad. 2006. “Strategic Questions about Strategic Partners: Challenges and Pitfalls in South Africa’s New Model of Land Restitution.” Paper presented to the Land, Memory, Reconstruction and Justice Conference, Cape Town, South Africa, September 13–15.
SECLUSION/LTS BOOK Name of Service User Seclusion or LTS Ward Legal Status under MHA at time of Seclusion/LTS Time and Date of Entry into Full Reason and Rational for Seclusion/LTS Full Name and Job Title of Decision Maker(s) to Seclude or LTS Time and Date of Seclusion/LTS end Total Time in Seclusion/LTS (HH:MM)
Underneath is a suggested structure to approaching part (a) which should be accessible to most candidates following a GCSE History course. It is offered as guidance and should not be seen as a writing frame or the only or best way to tackle this exercise. A brief introduction This needs to have a clear focus on the set question. It needs to briefly set the issue in its historical context. A short paragraph is sufficient here. An evaluation of the selected evidence connected with the issue in the question set. Here candidates can examine developments and issues, while making analysis and evaluation of the evidence selected. Candidates should evaluate up to five sources only, aiming to link the evidence to its use in the enquiry. It is recommended that the sources are integrated into supporting a narrative of life in the East End of London. Avoid a robotic trawl through the sources. When looking at the evidence you should consider points such as: What information does the source provide about …? Does the source back up your knowledge about …? Who was the author/maker? When was the source written? Why was it written? Is there any doubt over the author/is she trustworthy? It is recommended that the answer to part (a) should be about 800 words in total. SOURCE A1 [Part of a map of the East End produced by Charles Booth in 1889 as part of a long term project studying poverty.] (The full map shows almost all of London. It can be found at or ) SOURCE A2
Gumbo- Sm $8 .50 Med $10.50 Lg $12.50 Etoufee- Sm $8.50 Med $10.50 Lg $12.50 Po’boys Chicken Po’boy …………… $10.25 Shrimp Po’boy ……………. $12.50 Catfish Po’boy ……………. $12.50 Oyster Po’boy ……………. $13.50 Chicken 5pc Wings …………….……. $5.50 10pc Wings …………….…. $10.50 4pc Chicken Tenders…….$5.00 Shrimp 6pc ………………………….….. $5 12pc …………………….……… $10 Popcorn Shrimp.............…$5.50 Oysters 5pc ………………………………. $5.50 10pc …….…..…………………. $10.50 Pound Cake ………………... $3.00 Fish Catfish ………………………… $10.00 Whiting ………………………. $9.00 Pork Chop Pork Chop ……………………$4.75 Pork Chop Sandwich ……$6.50 Sides Small ….………………………. $3.50 Medium ……………….…….. $5.50 Large …………..…….……….. $7.50 X Large ……………..………… $10.50 Cajun Fries .………………… $3.25 Wing Sauce- Mild, Hot, BBQ, Cajun Ranch, Garlic Parmesan Water …………………………… $2 Sweet Tea/Soda …….…… $1.50 Add Fries: $3.00
Annex 1: Results Framework and Monitoring TH - HCFC Phaseout Project SOP Development Objective: The Program Development Objective is to contribute to Thailand’s efforts to reduce its HCFC consumption in accordance with the Montreal Protocol phase-out schedule leading to a complete phaseout by 2040. Program Level Results Indicators Core Unit of Measure Baseline Target Values Frequency Data Source/ Methodology Responsibility for Data Collection Description (indicator definition etc.) Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Indicator One: Overall Reduction in HCFC consumption under the Program % of Baseline 0 15% 35% 67.5% 100% At the end of each phase Customs Dpt and DIW’s import quotas/Cross verification of the two sources of data by independent auditor. Customs and DIW. % reduction from the baseline (average of 2009 and 2010 consumption). Project Development Objective (PDO): The Project Development Objective (PDO) is to reduce HCFC consumption in the air-conditioning and foam sectors in order to contribute to Thailand’s efforts to meet its HCFC consumption phase-out obligations under the first phase of the program (2014-2018). PDO Level Results Indicators Core Unit of Measure Baseline Target Values Frequency Data Source/ Methodology Responsibility for Data Collection Description (indicator definition etc.) YR 1 YR 2 YR3 YR 4 YR5 Indicator One: Reduction in HCFC consumption from foam and air conditioning sectors ODP ton 0 0 76 175 209 209 Annually Customs Dpt and DIW’s import quotas/Cross verification of the two sources of data by independent auditor. Customs and DIW. ODP multiplied by total import minus export in MT. INTERMEDIATE RESULTS Intermediate Result (Component One): Investment in HCFC Consumption Reductions (US$21.05Million) Intermediate Result indicator One: HCFC-141b consumption reduction in the foam sector ODP ton 0 0 70 152 152 152 Annually Progress reports prepared by PMU in collaboration with Polyurethane Industry of FTI. PMU Baseline consumption of foam enterprises that have already phased out their HCFC-141b usage. Intermediate Result indicator Two: GHG emission reduction from replacement of baseline tCO2 0 0 341,020 740,499 740,499 740,499 Annually Progress reports prepared by PMU in collaboration with PMU Reduction of GHG emission from replacement with
Intermediate Result (Component Four): Strengthening of the National Ozone Unit (US$0.87 million) Intermediate Result indicator One: Timely Issuance and enforcement of annual HCFC import quotas N/A N/A 1 1 1 1 1 Annually Progress Reports/Verification Report from Independent Auditor NOU Compliance with MP obligations Intermediate Result indicator Two: Timely Article 7 data submission N/A N/A 1 1 1 1 1 Annually Progress Reports/Meeting of the Parties Reports NOU
(ODS) 1-A 788.46 ODP 1 2018 1.2 2-A 1-A. 3, 1.2 2-A 1-A, 4.1.3, 4.2.3, 4.3.3, 4.4.3, 4.5.3, 4.6.3 4.7.3 3.1 2-A HCFC 1.2 2-A 1.2 2-A TARGETS, APPENDIX APPROVAL SCHEDULE APPENDIX APPENDIX APPENDIX APPENDIX APPENDIX