zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
adherence to annual advice letter guidelines as discussed above, and adherence to overall CRADA guidelines in D.12-12-031 Ordering Paragraphs 10. As to annual reports, the Board of Directors shall submit an annual report to the Executive Director of the Commission that provides information on the activities of the project, including the projects funded, the outcomes of the research, the extent of involvement of academics and other third parties, and the intellectual property that results from the research. SB 96 SB does not direct the filing of annual advice letter or Tier 3 Advice Letters. However, according to SB 96, the Joint Utilities must prepare and submit a joint report (Joint Utility Report) to the Commission by December 1, 2013 that covers the scope of the proposed research projects, how the proposed project may lead to technological advancement and potential breakthroughs in cyber security and grid integration, and the expected timelines for concluding the projects. Within 30 days of receiving the joint report, the Commission must determine whether the report is sufficient or requires revision. Upon determining if the report is sufficient, the Commission would send the report to the Legislature in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code. The Joint Utilities must also prepare and submit a similar report (Joint Utility Outcome Report) within 60 days of the conclusion of the CES-21 Program that summarizes the outcome of all funded projects, including an accounting of project expenditures and overhead costs, and progress towards goals. Upon receiving the joint reports, SB 96 orders the Commission to “determine whether the report is sufficient or requires revision, and upon determining that the report is sufficient submit the report to the Legislature.”
ATTACHMENT C PROJECT STATUS REPORT TO ACCOMPANY ANNUAL REPORT Purpose: State Legislative and Commission Oversight of ongoing CES-21 Program The information below must be reported electronically in spreadsheet format. Information for each project must be listed on separate rows in the columns specified below. Column Information Reported by the Joint Utilities Comment/Instruction A Investment Year Enter the year the reporting is being done for. B Project Name Enter project title. C Project Type Describe the type of project (Cyber Security etc.). A brief description of the project General description (objective, scope, deliverables, schedule). Date of the award The date the award/grant was made. (Format: XX/XX/XXXX) F Funding Amount ($) G Funds Expended to date: Contract/Grant Amount ($) H Funds Expended to date: In house expenditures ($) I Funds Expended to date: Total Spent to date ($) J Description of why this project was selected above other State the reasons why this project was prioritized.
DD ListBox User Guide Follow below steps to configure DD Listbox tool:- In this example, we have configured DDListbox for system entity i.e. Account and entity Contact. The list of contacts would be available for selection on Account entity. 1. Click on ‘INKEY’ site-map area on your CRM instance. Then, click on ‘DDListBox’ button. 2. Then, click on ‘New’ button to create a new DDListBox entity configuration record. 3. On click of the ‘New’ button, following ‘DD ListBox’entity form will get open.
Excellent Adequate Present Incomplete Missing Data (25%) Data table is clear and includes all appropriate units. The chosen graph best represents the data collected and is clearly titled and labeled. Data table is clear and includes all appropriate units. The chosen graph best represents the data collected but has a bad title or is unclearly labeled. Either the data table is missing units or the graph is poorly label or the wrong graph for this data. Data Table is present but graph is missing. MISSING Sketches (25%) Sketch clearly and correctly illustrates the movement of air with directional arrows and labels. Sketch clearly and correctly illustrates the movement of air with directional arrows and labels but is difficult to understand. Sketch clearly but incorrectly illustrates the movement of air with directional arrows and labels. Sketch is incorrect and/or is missing labels and/or directional arrows. MISSING Reasoning (25%) In 3-5 paragraphs, student will clearly explain the reasoning behind their conclusion. Reasoning should connect prior knowledge to conclusion by specifically referencing data collected. In 3-5 paragraphs, student attempted to explain reasoning behind their conclusion but was unclear at times. Reasoning attempted to connect prior knowledge to conclusion by specifically referencing data collected. Student attempted to explain reasoning and connected to prior knowledge and data, but was poorly written and unspecific. Student attempted to explain reasoning and connected to prior knowledge and data, but was less than 3 paragraphs. MISSING Conclusion (25%) Conclusion is correct. Conclusion is correct. Conclusion is clearly defined. Conclusion is given but incorrect and unclear. MISSING
KALKA PUBLIC SCHOOL SYLLABUS 2018 – 2019 CLASS VI SUBJECT TOPICS ENGLISH NOV. Literature Man of Science Book C: Chapter 9 Grammar Prepositions Editing Writing Skill Informal letter Dialogue completion L.R.T Pages 41 to 50 DEC. Literature Natural disaster in India The marvelous homework and housework machine Book C: Chapter 10, 11 Grammar Conjunctions Present tense Editing Writing Skill Dialogue writing L.R.T Pages 51 to 60 JAN. LITERATURE Earth day Book C: Chapter 12 WRITING SKILLS Story writing GRAMMAR Past tense Future tense PT -2 LITERATURE Natural disaster in India The marvelous homework and housework machine WRITING SKILLS Dialogue writing Editing GRAMMAR Conjunctions Present tense FEB. LITERATURE Revision WRITING SKILLS Story writing (Revision) GRAMMAR Past tense(Revision) Future tense(Revision) ANNUAL SYLLABUS LITERATURE Man of Science Natural disaster in India Earth day Preamble to the constitution of India Idgah, Festival of Eid
GEOGRAPHY CHAPTER-7 INDIA: LOCATION AND PHYSICAL FEATURES POLITICAL SCIENCE CHAPTER-5 LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT IN INDIA MAP WORK FEB. REVISION FOR FINAL EXAMS ANNUAL HISTORY CHAPTER 5: THE VEDIC AGE CHAPTER 7: Rise of new religions Chapter-8 The Mauryan empire Chapter-10 Contact with distance lands Chapter-11 New empires and kingdoms Chapter-12 Culture and science GEOGRAPHY Chapter 6: Major landforms of the earth Chapter-7 India: Location and physical features Chapter-8 India: Climate Chapter-9 India: Natural vegetation and wildlife POLITICAL SCIENCE Chapter 4: Key elements of Democracy Chapter-5 Local self government in India Chapter-6 Urban local self government Chapter-7 District administration Chapter-8 Rural livelihood Chapter-9 Urban livelihoods SUBJECT TOPICS COMPUTER APPLICATIONS NOV. CHAPTER 10 ALGORITHM AND FLOWCHART DEC. CHAPTER 6 MICROSOFT EXCEL 2010 CHAPTER 7 EDITING WORKSHEET JAN. CHAPTER 8 LOG ON TO FLASH CS3 PT-2 CHAPTER 6 MICROSOFT EXCEL 2010 CHAPTER 7 EDITING A WORKSHEET CHAPTER 10 ALGORITHM AND FLOWCHART FEB. REVISION ANNUAL CHAPTER COMPUTER LANGUAGES CHAPTER 6 MICROSOFT EXCEL 2010 CHAPTER 7 EDITING A WORKSHEET CHAPTER 8 LOG ON TO FLASH CS3 CHAPTER 10 ALGORITHM AND FLOWCHART
KALKA PUBLIC SCHOOL SYLLABUS 2018 – 2019 CLASS VI SUBJECT TOPICS ENGLISH JULY Literature BOOK – A L-4 Dad and the Cat and the Tree (poem) L-5 Idgah, Festival of Eid Grammar Nouns: Gender & Number Pronouns BOOK C : Chapter-4 Writing Skill Biographical Sketch L.R.T Pages – 11 to 15 AUGUST Literature BOOK –A L-6 Night of the Scorpion (poem) Grammar Verbs : Transitive & Intransitive Subject- Verb Agreement BOOK – C Chapters-5,6 Writing Skill Notice Writing L.R.T Pages – 16 to 25 PERIODIC TEST-I LITERATURE BOOK –A L-3 A Question of Grammar L-4 Dad and the Cat and the Tree (poem) WRITING SKILLS Diary Entry GRAMMAR Nouns : Kinds Pronouns SEPTEMBER LITERATURE BOOK –B Preamble to the Constitution of India In the Bazaars of Hyderabad (Poem) WRITING SKILLS Notice Writing Informal Letter GRAMMAR Adjective and Kinds Degrees of Comparison Book C Chapter-7 LRT Pages-26 to 30 OCTOBER LITERATURE Revision WRITING SKILLS Informal Letter GRAMMAR Adverb and Kinds BOOK C Chapter-8 LRT Pages-31 to 40 HALF YEARLY LITERATURE Valodya and Me A Question of Grammar Idgah, Festival of Eid Preamble to the Constitution of India POEMS: Vocation
2. The Earth Bible An important approach to reading biblical texts from the perspective of Earth has been developed in the Earth Bible project. This project is based in Adelaide, Australia, and was initiated by Norman Habel, a biblical scholar. The project's studies tend to be critical of anthropocentrism and to reject the idea of stewardship. They treat Earth (with a capital E) as a character, not unlike Lovelock's Gaia ecosystem. Their use of the term 'mutual custodianship' expresses the idea that the earth sustains humans just as humans should try to sustain the earth. The project has produced a set of six ecojustice principles. These were formulated in dialogue with ecologists and again include some similarities with Lovelock's proposals. For example: The principle of interconnectedness: Earth is a community of interconnected living things that are mutually dependent on each other for life and survival. The principle of mutual custodianship: Earth is a balanced and diverse domain where responsible custodians can function as partners, rather than rulers, to sustain a balanced and diverse Earth community. The principle of resistance: Earth and its components not only suffer from injustices at the hands of humans but actively resist them in the struggle for justice.1 1Norman Habel (ed.), Readings from the Perspective of Earth (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 2000), p. 24
Yes, Gary? MEMBER JEFFRESS: It seems to me that most of the stuff that we've discussed is already in our five most wanted document. You know, the need to put more resources into nautical charting, that's in the five most wanted. Shoreline mapping is in the five most wanted, which was a big thing in our group. Maybe we should just focus on what's already in the five most wanted document, and highlight how all the presentations in Alaska identify various components out of that document in the Alaskan scene. It just reinforces what we've already been saying for the last 12 years is it? CHAIR WELLSLAGER: Yes. David? MEMBER JAY: What seems to be different though, I think, is the emphasis on crowdsourcing. That seems like an important and new departure. But, I'm not disagreeing with the rest. I think that's a good point. CHAIR WELLSLAGER: Lawson? Oh,
what database these were parsed from, but they represent port or dock facilities. And so, you kind of get a flavor. Some of these are upriver, so they're fairly small. They're not represented in size by - they don't represent anything, but - CAPT. LOWELL: Can you get rid of that black band there? CAPT. GLANG: We had Duluth, you are correct. Where did New York go? That was New Hampshire. We had New York in - oh, Portland. I thought we had done Seattle, but maybe it's not showing up. CHAIR WELLSLAGER: We have done Seattle. CAPT. GLANG: Well, maybe it's not in my file. Well, we can just leave it like this, so Matt can talk to it, and - CHAIR WELLSLAGER: Could we bring it more - I mean, CONUS into the center of the screen? MEMBER BRIGHAM: Last time it -
(Laughter) MR. MAYER: - with different colors, so you know which group we're in. CHAIR WELLSLAGER: Color coordination, all right. How about if I get a beanie hat with a propeller? We could just have different color propellers. We could do that. MEMBER FIELDS: I liked it. I thought it was very good. CHAIR WELLSLAGER: You did? MEMBER FIELDS: Yes, the one on one with them, we thought that was very good. CHAIR WELLSLAGER: It was beneficial, and I think the users, instead of sitting back on the outside looking in, having a chance to say, you know, this is something, in an individual setting, a bit more intimate setting, worked out well. So, yes, I was pretty hip to that thing. It was awesome. MEMBER BRIGHAM: Yes, I think certainly very positive. The challenge is how
LEGAL STANDARDS, COMPLIANCE RATINGS AND FINDINGS AREA 3: ADMINISTRATION – MANUALS AND HANDBOOKS CRITERION NUMBER REQUIREMENTS 3.1 Policies & Procedures Manual 28.09(11)(b) All approved public day program shall maintain onsite a policies and procedures manual and shall provide written notice to parents of enrolled students that copies of such policies and procedures are available upon request. The program’s manual must contain a Table of Contents and a policy for all subject areas. The policies and procedures must include, but are not limited to: Reporting Suspected Child Abuse/Neglect to DCF and to the Disabled Persons Protection Commission (Criterion 3.1(c)); Evacuation and Emergency Procedures (3.1(d) ; Immediate Notification (Form2) (Criterion 4.5); State and District-Wide Assessments (Criterion 7.3); Program Modifications and Support Services for Limited English Proficient (LEP) students (Criterion 8.4); IEP Progress Reports (Criterion 8.8); Less Restrictive Placement (Criterion 8.10); Transition Planning (Criterion 8.11); Behavior Management (Criterion 9.1); Student Separation Resulting From Behavior Management (Criterion 9.1(a)); Runaway Students (Criterion 9.3); Physical Restraint (Criterion 9.4); 3-5 Day Suspensions (Criterion 9.5); 10+ Day Suspensions (Criterion 9.6); Terminations (Criterion 9.7); Supervision of Students (Criterion 11.11); New Staff Orientation and Annual In-Service Training (Criterion 12.1 and 12.2); Parent Involvement (Criterion 15.1); Change of Student’s Legal Status (Criterion 15.4); Parent Consent and Notification(Criterion 15.5); Registering Complaints and Grievances – parents, students and employees
and then click Update Current Page to update only the open page or click Update Pages to update all the pages based on the template. Favorites List in the Assets Panel If you frequently use certain images, templates, or other assets such as URLs, display those assets on your Favorites List in the Assets panel. To do so, select one or more assets in the Site list, and then click the Add To Favorites button.
Which statistical technique is appropriate when we describe a single population of qualitative data with exactly two categories? The z-test of a population proportion. The chi-squared goodness-of-fit test. The chi-squared test of a contingency table. Both (a) and (b). Analysis: A. Incorrect. Both (a) and (b) are appropriate. B. Incorrect. Both (a) and (b) are appropriate. C. Incorrect. Both (a) and (b) are appropriate. D. Correct. Both (a) and (b) are appropriate. ANSWER: D Ref: Section 15.3 The chi-squared distribution is used in: a goodness-of-fit test. a test of a contingency table. describing a population having more than two categories. All of these choices are true. Analysis: A. Incorrect. All of these choices are true. B. Incorrect. All of these choices are true. C. Incorrect. All of these choices are true. D. Correct. All of these choices are true. ANSWER: D Ref: Section 15.3 Which statistical technique is appropriate when we compare two or more populations of qualitative data with two or more categories? The z-test of the difference between two proportions. The chi-squared goodness-of-fit test. The chi-squared test of a contingency table. Both (a) and (b). Analysis: A. Incorrect. The chi-squared test of a contingency table is appropriate. B. Incorrect. The chi-squared test of a contingency table is appropriate. C. Correct. The chi-squared test of a contingency table is appropriate. D. Incorrect. The chi-squared test of a contingency table is appropriate. ANSWER: C Ref: Section 15.3 Which of the following tests is used to analyze nominal data? The z test for one proportion, p, or difference of two proportions, . The chi-squared goodness-of-fitness test. The chi-squared test of a contingency table. All of these choices are true.
Analysis: A. Incorrect. Events A and B are said to be independent. B. Correct. Events A and B are said to be independent. C. Incorrect. Events A and B are said to be independent. D. Incorrect. Events A and B are said to be independent. ANSWER: B Ref: Section 5.2 If A and B are independent events with P(A) = 0.60 and P(A|B) = 0.60, then P(B) is: 1.20 0.60 0.36 Cannot be determined with the information given. Analysis: A. Incorrect. Cannot be determined with the information given. B. Incorrect. Cannot be determined with the information given. C. Incorrect. Cannot be determined with the information given. D. Correct. Cannot be determined with the information given. ANSWER: D Ref: Section 5.2 If events A and B are independent then: P(A and B) = P(A)* P(B) P(A and B) = P(A) + P(B) P(B|A) = P(A) None of these choices. Analysis: A. Correct. P(A and B) = P(A)* P(B) B. Incorrect. P(A and B) = P(A)* P(B) C. Incorrect. P(A and B) = P(A)* P(B) D. Incorrect. P(A and B) = P(A)* P(B) ANSWER: A Ref: Section 5.2 - 5.3 Two events A and B are said to be mutually exclusive if: P(A|B) = 1 P(A|B) = P(A) P(A and B) =1 P(A and B) = 0 Analysis: A. Incorrect. If P(A and B) = 0 B. Incorrect. If P(A and B) = 0 C. Incorrect. If P(A and B) = 0 D. Correct. If P(A and B) = 0 ANSWER: D Ref: Section 5.2 - 5.3
Which of the following is not a characteristic of a binomial experiment? There is a sequence of identical trials. Each trial results in two or more outcomes. The trials are independent of each other. The probability of success p is the same from one trial to another. Analysis: A. Incorrect. Each trial results in two or more outcomes is not a characteristic. B. Correct. Each trial results in two or more outcomes is not a characteristic. C. Incorrect. Each trial results in two or more outcomes is not a characteristic. D. Incorrect. Each trial results in two or more outcomes is not a characteristic. ANSWER: B Ref: Section 6.2 The expected value, E(X), of a binomial probability distribution with n trials and probability p of success is: n + p np(1-p) np n + p - 1 Analysis: A. Incorrect. np is the expected value, E(X). B. Incorrect. np is the expected value, E(X). C. Correct. np is the expected value, E(X). D. Incorrect. np is the expected value, E(X). ANSWER: C Ref: Section 6.2 The variance of a binomial distribution for which n = 100 and p = 0.20 is: 100 80 20 16 Analysis: A. Incorrect. The variance is 80 B. The variance is 80 C. Incorrect. The variance is 80 D. Correct. ANSWER: D Ref: Section 6.2 Which of the following about the binomial distribution is not a true statement? The probability of success must be constant from trial to trial.
approaches the normal distribution as the degrees of freedom increase. has more area in the tails than the standard normal distribution does. All of these choices are true. Analysis: A. Incorrect. All of these choices are true. B. Incorrect. All of these choices are true. C. Incorrect. All of these choices are true. D. Correct. All of these choices are true. ANSWER: D Ref: Section 7.3 Suppose X has a chi-squared distribution with 10 degrees of freedom. The mean of X is: 10 9 20 None of these choices. Analysis: A. Correct. The mean of X is 10 B. Incorrect. The mean of X is 10 C. Incorrect. The mean of X is 10 D. Incorrect. The mean of X is 10 ANSWER: A Ref: Section 7.3 Which of the following distributions is not skewed? Student t F All of these distributions are skewed. Analysis: A. Correct. Student t is not skewed. B. Incorrect. Student t is not skewed. C. Incorrect. Student t is not skewed. D. Incorrect. Student t is not skewed. ANSWER: A Ref: Section 7.3
Supply Condition 71 Enter supply condition code from which item is to be shipped. Management 72 Enter appropriate issue management code. Day of Year (Transaction) 73-75 Enter ordinal day of the calendar year on which transaction is prepared. Multiuse 76-79 For intra-Component use, enter data prescribed by Component. For use, leave blank., Dual-Use 80 Multi-Use (80) For intra-Component use, enter data prescribed by Component Reason for Reversal (80) For inter-Component use, authorized for reason for reversal code for all DoD Components when reversing an Issue transaction. ,
LEARNING AGREEMENT FOR STUDIES The Student Last name (s) First name (s) Date of birth Nationality Sex [M/F] Academic year 20../20.. Study cycle 1-cycle (BSc) 2-cycle (MSc) Subject area, Code Electronics and Telecommunications 0714 (ET) 0610 (ICT) Phone E-mail The Sending Institution Name Poznan University of Technology Faculty Faculty of Electronics and Telecommunications Erasmus code (if applicable) PL POZNAN02 Department Address Pl. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 5 60-965 Poznań Country, Country code PL Contact person name Ms Magdalena Zawirska- Wolniewicz (Insitutional Coordinator) Dr Jan Lamperski (Departamental Coordinator) Contact person e-mail / phone +48 61 665 3981 +48 61 665 3863 The Receiving Institution Name Faculty Erasmus code (if applicable) Department Address Country, Country code Contact person name Contact person e-mail / phone For guidelines, please look at Annex 1, for end notes please look at Annex 2.
B. Sheet Steel for joists, studs and accessories 18 gage and lighter: ASTM A653, structural steel, zinc coated // G60 // // G90 //, with a yield of 230 MPa (33 ksi) minimum. C. Galvanizing Repair Paint: MILP21035B. SPEC WRITER NOTE: Retain grout when concrete or masonry substrates require leveling prior to setting track or prefabricated assemblies. D. Nonmetallic, Non-shrink Grout: Premixed, nonmetallic, noncorrosive, nonstaining grout containing selected silica sands, Portland cement, shrinkage-compensating agents, plasticizing and water-reducing agents, complying with ASTM C1107, with fluid consistency and a 30 minute working time. 2.2 WALL FRAMING: SPEC WRITER NOTE: Retain this article when steel studs are required. Select the steel thickness as required. Sequence corresponds to 20 gage, 18 gage, 16 gage, 14 gage, and 12 gage thicknesses. A. Steel Studs: Complying with ASTM C 955. Manufacturer’s standard steel studs of web depth indicated, with lipped flanges, and complying with the following: Minimum Base-Steel Thickness(uncoated): //0.84 mm (0.0329 inch)// //1.09 mm (0.0428 inch)// //1.37 mm (0.0538 inch)// //1.72 mm (0.0677 inch)// //2.45 mm (0.0966 inch)// SPEC WRITER NOTE: Flange widths vary with application. When sheathing and/or masonry ties are required, use a minimum flange width of 41 mm (1 5/8 inches).
5 N/A Critical Thinking CTE: Analysis CTE: Analysis 50 Consequential Ethical Theories Chapter 5 Chapter 5 20 CTE: Application 1 CTE: Application 1 30 6 N/A Ethical Theories, Part 1 Chapter 6 Chapter 6 20 CTE: Application 2 CTE: Application 2 30 7 N/A Ethical Theories, Part 2 Chapter 7 Chapter 7 20 CTE: Application 3 CTE: Application 3 30 8 SPRING BREAK 3/4 - 3/11 (Sun) CTE: Decision Making CTE: Decision Making 20 CTE: Evaluation CTE: Evaluation 20 CTE: Reflection CTE: Reflection 20 9 SPRING BREAK 3/4 - 3/11 (Mon-Sun) 10 N/A Personal Code of Ethics Personal Code of Ethics 100 Business Ethics Chapter 8 Chapter 8 20
11 Last Day to Withdraw with "W" 3/21 Business and Society as Stakeholders Chapter 9 Chapter 9 20 The Employment Relationship Chapter 10 Chapter 10 20 12 SPRING HOLIDAY 3/30 - 4/1 (Fri-Sun) Professional Ethics Chapter 11 Chapter 11 20 Professional Code of Ethics Analysis Paper 100 Codes of Ethics Chapter 12 Chapter 12 20 13 4/2- 4/8 N/A Government Ethics Chapter 13 Chapter 13 20 Economic Justice Chapter 14 None 14 N/A Major Social Issues To Be Determined None Major Social Issues To Be Determined None 15 N/A Hot Topic #1 Discussion/ Research Link 20 Hot Topic #2 Discussion/ Research Link 20 16 N/A Hot Topic #3 Discussion/ Research Link 20 Final Exam Review Applied Ethics Student Questionnaire (Post-Test) Applied Ethics Student Questionnaire (Post-Test) 5 SSI SSI 5 Attendance Attendance 10
Lindsey & Jeffers (dba) (8 Dec 2014) (Add Insurance & $0 Sales Rpt) (Extend to Max Term – Dec 8, 2020) Vendor Name Base Contract (Effective Date) Amendment #1 (Purpose) Amendment #2 (Purpose) Amendment #3 (Purpose) Mass Ingenuity (8 Dec 2014) (Add Insurance & $0 Sales Rpt) *Awaiting Signature (Extend to Max Term – Dec 8, 2020) Ogden Murphy Wallace, P.L.L.C. (9 Dec 2016) PeopleFirm, LLC (8 Dec 2014) (Add Insurance & $0 Sales Rpt) (Extend to Max Term – Dec 8, 2020) Point B, Inc. (8 Dec 2014) (Add Insurance & $0 Sales Rpt) (Extend to Max Term – Dec 8, 2020) Public Knowledge, LLC (8 Dec 2014) (Add Insurance & $0 Sales Rpt) (Extend to Max Term – Dec 8, 2020) Vendor Name Base Contract (Effective Date) Amendment #1 (Purpose) Amendment #2 (Purpose) Amendment #3 (Purpose) Scontrino-Powell, Inc. (8 Dec 2014) (Add Insurance & $0 Sales Rpt) (Extend to Max Term – Dec 8, 2020)
Planning and organising Able to organise own research activities to deadline and quality standards. CV, References, Interview Problem solving and initiative Able to develop understanding of complex problems and apply knowledge to address them. Able to develop original techniques/methods. Experience of collecting data and processing techniques using software and presenting key outputs. CV, References, Interview Management and teamwork Work effectively in a team, understanding the strengths and weaknesses of others to help teamwork development. Able to supervise work of junior research staff, delegating effectively. Able to contribute to Academic Unit management and administrative processes. CV, References, Interview Communicating and influencing Communicate new and complex information effectively, both verbally and in writing, engaging the interest and enthusiasm of the target audience. Able to present research results at group meetings and conferences. Able to write up research results for publication in leading peer-viewed journals. Work proactively with colleagues in other work areas/institutions, contributing specialist knowledge to achieve outcomes. Contribute to Researcher Development and Graduate Centre Activities as appropriate to promote the EPSRC Doctoral Prize Award Scheme and provide input to the various workshops and other events. CV, References, Interview Other skills and behaviours Understanding of relevant Health & Safety issues particularly in a) a heavy structures laboratory, b) adjacent a live railway. Positive attitude to colleagues and students CV, References, Interview Special requirements Able to attend national and international conferences to present research results. Current UK driving licence (to drive University vehicles) CV, References, Interview
Steady State Power Flow Case Data Certified (all TSPs) Steady State Topology Processor Files Secure Steady State TPIT Procedures Secure System Protection Short Circuit Data Secure Transient Stability Screening Study for ERCOT System Certified (all TSPs) TSP Planning Criteria and Procedures Secure Voltage Stability Screening Study for ERCOT System Certified (all TSPs)
PGRR Number PGRR Title Stability Limits in the Full Interconnect Study Date of Decision February 2, 2017 Action Recommended Approval Timeline Normal Proposed Effective Date Upon implementation of Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) 809, GTC or GTL for New Generation Interconnection Priority and Rank Assigned Not applicable Guide Sections Requiring Revision 5.4.2, Full Interconnection Study 5.4.3, Steady-State Analysis 5.4.5, Dynamic and Transient Stability (Unit Stability, Voltage, Subsynchronous Resonance) Analysis 5.4.5.1, Subsynchronous Resonance Studies 5.4.8, FIS Study Report and Follow-up 5.4.10 Confidentiality 5.7.5, Interconnection Process Timetables 7.1, Planning Data and Information Related Documents Requiring Revision/Revision Requests Planning Guide Revision Request (PGRR) 052, Stability Assessment for Interconnecting Generation PGRR053, Addition of Proposed All-Inclusive Generation Resources to the Planning Models NPRR809 Revision Description This PGRR clarifies the content, review period and process for posting the results of a Full Interconnection Study (FIS). This PGRR also establishes a process for identifying, proposing, and implementing solutions to stability issues identified during the FIS. Reason for Revision Addresses current operational issues. Meets Strategic goals (tied to the or directed by the ERCOT Board). Market efficiencies or enhancements Administrative Regulatory requirements Other: (explain) (please select all that apply)
System Protection Analysis (following Steady-State Analysis) TSP(s) 10 to 30 Dynamic and Transient Stability Analysis (following System Protection Study) TSP(s) 10 to 90 Facility Study TSP(s) 10 to 90 SSR TSP(s) or IE rior to Study Report Review and Acceptance (following issuance of FIS) ERCOT, and TSP(s) 10 to 15 Negotiate and Execute Standard Generation Interconnection Agreement (SGIA) (following acceptance of FIS) IE and TSP 180 7.1 Planning Data and Information (1) The information available on the applicable Market Information System (MIS) (i.e., Public, Secure or Certified Areas) includes, but is not limited to, planning information pertaining to the following: (a) Long-term planning; (b) Regional transmission planning; (c) Steady state data; (d) Resource integration; (e) Case studies and files used in planning; (f) Model information; and (g) Data and information available to specific groups of Market Participants. (i) Market Participants with a nondisclosure agreement with ERCOT have designated sections on the MIS that allow access to the certified posting of group information.
Summary of ROS Discussion On 2/2/17, there was no discussion. TAC Decision On 3/23/17, TAC unanimously voted to recommend approval of PGRR054 as recommended by ROS in the 2/2/17 ROS Report. All Market Segments were present for the vote. Summary of TAC Discussion On 3/23/17, there was no discussion. ERCOT Opinion ERCOT supports approval of PGRR054 as it establishes that FIS study results be made available to all Market Participants at the same time that it is made available to the IE, and it describes the process to be followed if a stability issue is identified in an FIS. Sponsor Name Charles DeWitt on behalf of PLWG E-mail Address Company LCRA Phone Number 512-578-4199 Cell Number 512-434-9557 Market Segment Not applicable Market Rules Staff Contact Name Brittney Albracht E-Mail Address Phone Number 512-225-7027 Comments Received Comment Author Comment Summary None Market Rules Notes Please note the following PGRR(s) also propose revisions to the following section(s):
2S1C. Test Takers (Completers) Passing Credentialing Test Rate* Met Met 2S1D. Completers Passing Credential Test Rate** Met Met 2S1E. Completers who passed a credentialing test plus Completers who earned an Advanced Studies Diploma and did not pass acredentialing test** Met Met 3S1 Secondary School Completion Not Met N/A 4S1 Student Graduation Rate Met N/A 5S1 Secondary Placement (Transition) Rate Met Met 5S1 Program Completer Response Rate Met N/A 6S1 Nontraditional Career Preparation (Enrollment) Not Met N/A 6S2 Nontraditional Career Preparation (Completion) Not Met N/A The 2016-2017 Statewide Annual Performance Report will be located at
c. Weld clip angles to both legs of angle at top and bottom. d. Drill clips and plates, at top and bottom for anchoring jamb angles with two 9 mm (3/8 inch) expansion bolts at each location. e. Cut rabbet for pivot hinges and lock strike. SPEC WRITER NOTE: See Section 10 26 00, WALL AND DOOR PROTECTION for interior guards used in finished spaces. Use structural steel items for service and shop areas. Use paragraph B where door frame is not used. 2.7 GUARDS A. Wall Corner Guards: 1. Fabricate from steel angles and furnish with anchors as shown. 2. Continuously weld anchor to angle. B. Guard Angles for Overhead Doors: 1. Cut away top portion of outstanding leg of angle and extend remaining portion of angle up wall. 2. Weld filler piece across head of opening to jamb angles. 3. Make provisions for fasteners and anchorage. C. Channel Guard at Loading Platform: 1. Fabricate from steel channel of size shown. 2. Weld anchors to channels as shown. 3. Drill channel for bumper anchor bolts. D. Edge Guard Angles for Openings in slabs. 1. Fabricate from steel angles of sizes and with anchorage shown. 2. Where size of angle is not shown, provide 50 x 50 x 6 mm (2 x 2 x 1/4 inch) steel angle with 32 x 5 mm (1-1/4 x 3/16 inch) strap anchors, welded to back. 3. Miter or butt angles at corners and weld. 4. Use one anchor near end and three feet on centers between end anchors. E. Wheel Guards: 1. Construct wheel guards of not less than 16 mm (5/8 inch) thick cast iron. 2. Provide corner type, with flanges for bolting to walls. 2.8 COVERS AND FRAMES FOR PITS AND TRENCHES A. Fabricate covers to support live loads specified. B. Galvanized steel members after fabrication in accordance with ASTM A123, G-90 coating.
COPYRIGHT 21 CORRESPONDENCE / CLASS NEWSLETTERS CUMULATIVE RECORD FOLDERS CUM FOLDER ORGANIZATION 22 CURRICULUM CUSTODIAL RESPONSIBILITIES 2 DISCIPLINE DISMISSAL - DISTRIBUTION OF MATERIALS THROUGH DAYS 2 EMERGENCY 2 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM / 28 EVALUATION - TEACHER EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CLASSES FIELD FIRE DRILLS / EMERGENCY EVACUATIONS GOALS / OBJECTIVES GRADE GRADING SYSTEM RELEASE EARLY ESOL
THE FAMILY COURT OF THE 14TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF BEAUFORT JUDGE: GERALD C. SMOAK DOCKET FOR TUESDAY, MAY 28, COURT REPORTER: DONNA HARTLEY TIME CASE NO: PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT CAUSE ATTORNEYS ORDER SIGNED 9:00 am ER Time 9:15 am ER Time 13-JU-137 John Doe Det. Hrg. P-J. McCormick D-S. Lee BCDSS/PS 9:30 am – 12 pm (See Attached Docket) 11:45 am 30 min 13-467 Richard A. Meccariello Laurie E. Meccarielo MTR (2) P-B. Kennedy D- J.McDougall 2:00 pm 15 min 12-870 Melissa Damren Jonathan C. Damren MTR P-L. Weidner D-S. Merrifield 2:15 pm 15 min 13-357 Muriel Elliott-Allen Yeshi Allen MTR P-D. Mathis D-Pro Se 2:45 pm 15 min 12-1564 Stephen L. Myers Lisa G. Myers MTR P-L. Weidner D-E. Fleming 3:00 pm 15 min 13-21 Allred V. Campbell April D. Campbell MTR P-K. Tootle D-Pro Se 3:15 pm 15 min 13-572 Sydnora D. Chess Chahn C. Chess MTR P-G. Brown D-Pro Se 3:30 pm 15 min 13-599 Wendy Wagner Richard Wagner MTR P-K. Ferguson D-Pro Se 3:45 pm 1 hr 15 min 13-419 Doug W. Massalon Lora M. Massolon MOT (5) P-R. Tupper D-G. Brown Page 1 of 1
THE FAMILY COURT O F THE 14TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF BEAUFORT JUDGE: GERALD C. SMOAK DOCKET FOR WEDNESDAY, MAY 29, 2013 COURT REPORTER: DONNA HARTLEY TIME CASE NO. PLAINTIFF DEENDANT CAUSE ATTORNEYS ORDER SIGNED 9:00 am ER Time 9:15 am ER Time 12-717 Donald Pirozzi Sharon Pirozzi Final P-W. Clark D-B. Kennedy GAL-R. Banis 9:30 am All Day 11-1644 (365) Elizabeth M. Bishop (B/U:April 8 & 9) Clyde K. Bishop (Day 1 of 2) Motion to Bifurcate and Final P-P. Infinger D-J. Moss/F. Kuhn
provide to the state. The Vendor must provide its proposed number of kiosks for each facility, filling in the yellow boxes. Vendor must meet or exceed the current number of kiosks available at each location today. Facility Name Facility Address Type Number of Offenders (as of September 1, 2016) Number of Kiosks Today Vendor Proposed Number of Kiosks (must be equal to or greater than current number) Facility 21390 Old State Road 37 Branchville, IN 47514 Adult 1221 11 Camp Summit 2407 N 500 W, Laporte, IN 46350 53 To Be Chain O’Lakes Facility 3516 E 75 South Albion, IN 46701 Adult 121 2 Facility 5124 Reformatory Rd Pendleton, IN 46064 Adult 1434 13 Edinburgh Facility P.O. Box 470, 23rd & Schoolhouse Rd. Edinburgh, IN 46124 Adult 327 4 Heritage Trail Facility 501 W. Main Street Plainfield, Indiana 46168 Adult 751 9
Indiana State Prison 1 Park Row Michigan City, IN 46360 Adult 2181 27 Indiana Women’s Prison 2596 Girl’s School Road Indianapolis, IN 46214 Adult 607 12 Facility 401 North Randolph Street Indianapolis, IN 46201 Adult 289 10 Juvenile Facility Treatment and Intake Unit 1118 South State Road 25 Logansport, IN 46947 145 To Be Madison Facility (Women) 800 MSH Bus Stop Drive Madison, IN 47250 Adult 565 11 Madison Juvenile Facility 1130 MSH 4th Street Madison, Indiana 47250 44 4 Miami Facility 3038 West 850 South Bunker Hill, IN 46914 Adult 3082 63 Education
New Castle Facility 1000 Van Nuys Road P.O. Box E New Castle, IN 47362 Adult 3164 62 Pendleton Facility 4490 W. Reformatory Rd. Pendleton, IN 46064-9001 Adult 1716 29 Pendleton Juvenile Facility 9310 South State Road 67 Pendleton, IN 46064 170 3 Facility 727 Moon Road Plainfield, IN 46168 Adult 1502 20 Facility 1946 West U.S. Hwy 40 Greencastle, IN 46135 Adult 1985 22 Reception Center 737 Moon Road Plainfield, IN 46168 Adult 455 To Be Rockville Facility (Women) 811 W. 50 N Rockville, IN 47872 Adult 1012 22 South Bend Community Re-Entry Center 4650 Old Cleveland Road South Bend IN, 46628 Adult 147 3
between offenders and case managers. IDOC requires a system that allows for messaging between offenders and friends/family. The system must be archive all communication and must be searchable by IDOC internal affairs. IDOC requires a system that allows customized communication workflows and the ability to push notifications/alerts with an audit trail to be able to see who has opened and read the alerts. Please describe your system’s ability to meet these requirements. Optional: Please describe any other offender services applications that will be available with your solution. Behavior/Rewards Content Offender Behavior/Rewards Content Specifications Description of proposed solution and how it meets/exceeds the Offender Behavior/Rewards Content specifications: IDOC requires a system that will provide reward/behavior-based content to offenders. Please describe your solution offering.
any alternative stratification of anti-malarial exposure in participants other than that provided by the self-reported data. Figure 11 shows that HMAS Darwin first deployment had a relatively larger proportion of dental assessments and HMAS Brisbane had a relatively large proportion of ophthalmological specialist attendances. This could have reflected, particularly in the case of dental attendances, the availability of these specialists. Otherwise, the distribution of specialist attendances was of a similar pattern across the Ships. Of particular relevance is that there was no recording of greatly increased neurological, respiratory or dermatological specialist attendances, that may reflect increased adverse health effects in these body systems requiring specialist medical attention during deployment, and which could relate to chemical, environmental or medical exposures such as PB, SMOIL, dust or oil in water. Table 7 Number of times exposures of interest noted in Ships’ Logs HMAS Darwin Aug - Dec 1990 HMAS Adelaide Aug - Dec 1990 HMAS Success Aug 1990 - Feb 1991 HMAS Brisbane Nov 1990 - Apr 1991 HMAS Sydney Nov 1990 - Apr 1991 HMAS Westralia Jan - June 1991 HMAS Darwin Apr - Sept 1991 Chemical alarms (not noted in logs as exercise) 4 22 6 11 13 2 7 Chemical alarms (not noted exercise in logs or RoP information) 0 0 1 1 5 0 4 Dust storm 0 0 0 3 4 2 0 SMOIL/SMOID 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Oil slick and smell 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 Food Poisoning 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pyridostigmine bromide 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vaccinations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Table 8 Number of times exposures of interest noted in Reports of Proceedings HMAS Darwin Aug - Dec 1990 HMAS Adelaide Aug - Dec 1990 HMAS Success Aug 1990 - Feb 1991 HMAS Brisbane Nov 1990 - Apr 1991 HMAS Sydney Nov 1990 - Apr 1991 HMAS Westralia Jan - June 1991 HMAS Darwin Apr - Sept 1991 NBCD Exercises* 192 533 281 238 62 158 134
Dust storm 1 0 0 1 2 2 1 SMOIL/SMOID 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 Oil slick and smell 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 Pyridostigmine bromide 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 Vaccinations 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Other 0 0 0 1 (viral stomach ailment) 1 (influenza) 1 (viral food poisoning) 1 (viral 0 * One exercise was often held over multiple days and more than one exercise was often completed per day.
Table 12 Summary of reporting of preventive medication in the Ships' Medical Journals Deployment dates HMAS Darwin Aug - Dec 1990 HMAS Adelaide Aug - Dec 1990 HMAS Success Aug 1990 - Feb 1991 HMAS Brisbane Nov 1990 - Apr 1991 HMAS Darwin Apr - Sept 1991 Six-month journal period 1/7-31/12/90 1/7-31/12/90 1/7-31/12/90 1/1-30/6/91 1/1/91-30/6/91 1/7-31/12/91 Anti-chemical warfare agents - - During period lectures re use of anti-chemical warfare agents, medications distributed Reference to chemical autojects, and removal of war load supplement with reduced biological threat since cessation of open hostilities - Malaria prophylaxis Chloroquine Yes Yes - - - - Yes Yes Doxycycline Yes (in port) Yes (in port) - - - - - - Maloprim - - - - - - Yes Yes* Not specified which - - Yes - - - - - * (IAW ABR1991)
what happens if one of these cogs gets damaged? And what if you can’t get a replacement cog, or you can’t get it quickly or at a good price? Dutch company Blue Traction Repair is on hand to save the entire workings from grinding to a long-lasting halt – using the latest 3D printing technology. At CeMAT 2016, the drive developer from Zoeterwoude is showcasing its swift and affordable method for producing spare parts. The company uses the new Roboze One 3D printer – named after its Italian manufacturer – which can reproduce objects in plastics. The professional desktop device processes up to twelve different materials, including PEEK, PEI and carbon PA (nylon6 with added carbon fibers). The Roboze printer is designed to produce functional prototypes for industrial and medical customers. The 3D printer is purpose-designed for creating objects with complex geometrical shapes. For example, support structures printed using a second material can be removed more easily. Blue Traction Repair quickly realized the technology’s potential for providing a swift and cost-effective spare parts service. The customer simply sends a sample or a CAD file for the part required and quickly receives a precise reproduction made from the most suitable material. Blue Traction Repair B.V. (2382 NT Zoeterwoude, Netherlands), Hall 26, Stand J32/1 Austria takes charge! With a great program of events and even some national delicacies on
Contract 05614 – Telephone Based Translation Services (NASPO VALUEPOINT #50-000-14-00002a) DES Contract Specialist: LeAnna Sandy, Contracts Specialist Contracts, Procurement, & Risk Management (360) 407-8535 leanna.sandy@des.wa.gov Awarded contractor(s) Master Contract Participating Addendum Corporate Translation Services dba CTS Language Link Linguistica International, Inc. Voiance Language Services, LLC Contract Amendment # Purpose Effective Date 1 Changes the effective date of the Contract from 7/1/2015 to 5/1/2015. 05/29/2015 2 Requires listing of offender last name & DOC inmate # on DOC invoices. 01/25/2016 3 Incorporates Voiance’s new Contract rate of $0.65/minute. 06/01/2016 n/a Contract has been extended through 03/04/2018 03/05/2018 Attached Documents: Contractor Information and Pricing Service Requirements Terms and Conditions (to include WSCA terms and conditions and state of WA specific terms and conditions) Contractor information Contractor: Corporate Translation Services, Inc. Dba CTS Languagelink 911 Main Street, Suite 10
Option B* $.54/minute for Spanish for language $.69/minute for all other languages *Customers will be required to choose Option A or Option B when setting up their account. Optional Equipment: Purchase of Dual Handset Medical Antibacterial (standard copper line) Phone: $90.00 each Dual Handset DECT set (standard copper line): $55.00 each Tri handset DECT (standard copper line): $69.99 (additional equipment available upon request at 20% discount off MSRP) Contractor’s Website: Federal Tax Identification No.: 45-2767932 Contacts: First Second Name/Title: Rene Gomez/COO Wilson Ostojic, Director of Account Services Telephone: (801) 262-4550 (801) 617-1958 Fax: (801) 262-4622 (801) 262-4622 Email: Payment Terms: 1% 30 Days, Net 30 Payment/Invoicing Addresses: Linguistica International, Inc. 8819 South Redwood Road, Suite D Salt Lake City, UT 84088 Credit Card Acceptance: Yes MWVBE: none Contractor information Contractor: Voiance Language Services, LLC 5780 North Swan Road Tucson, AZ 85718 PRICING: $.65/minute for all languages listed herein as well as for all unlisted languages that may be provided through the contract Optional Equipment: Corded Dual Hand-Set single Line Phone (Implementation Team will assess how many phones are required to provide optimal service): No Cost
CREST Collaborative COORDINATED PROGRAM REVIEW REPORT OF FINDINGS Dates of Onsite Visit: November 17–19, 2015 Date of Draft Report: December 22, 2014 Date of Final Report: February 3, 2015 Action Plan Due: March 10, 2015 Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Onsite Team Members: Rhonda Mojkowski, Chairperson Timothy Gallagher Christine Romancewicz Mitchell D. Chester, Ed.D. Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education
18.04(8); Section 504: 29 U.S.C. 794; 34 CFR Title II: 42 U.S.C. 12132; 28 CFR 35.149, 35.150; Mass. Const. amend. art. 114 Rehabilitation Act of 1973. A program which enrolls students requiring wheelchairs shall have at least one entrance without steps and wide enough for a wheelchair, for each building utilized in carrying out the IEPs for such students. If any part of the program is not accessible to students with limited physical mobility, a plan and timetable shall be provided that describes how the program will make all programs and appropriate buildings accessible. Rating: Implemented Response Required: No AREA 15: PARENT AND STUDENT INVOLEMENT CRITERION NUMBER REQUIREMENTS 15.5 Parent Consent and Required Notification 18.05(5)(c); 18.05(8); 18.05(9)(f)(1); 18.05 (9)(j); M.G.L. c. 71, § 32A The program shall develop and implement policy and procedures to work with school districts to obtain the following consents: Annual: Emergency medical treatment Restraints Medication Administration (when applicable) When applicable: Research Experimentation Fundraising Publicity and Observation The program’s policy and procedures shall include, when applicable, notification pursuant to Parental Notification Law M.G.L. c. 71, § 32A concerning curriculum that primarily involves human sexual education or human sexuality issues.