5. Disbursement Estimates (US$m) Actual amount disbursed as of 9/09/2011 44.81 Fiscal Year Annual Cumulative 2012 5.0 49.81 2013 5.2 55.00 Total 6. Policy Exceptions and Safeguard Policies Does the restructured project require any exceptions to Bank policies? N Does the restructured project trigger any new safeguard policies? If yes, please select from the checklist below and update ISDS accordingly before submitting the package. N 7a. Project Development Objectives/Outcomes Original/Current Project Development Objectives/Outcomes The overarching PDO is: to rehabilitate selected priority roads, port and airport facilities of the Recipient; and to support the regulatory and institutional reform and effective management of the Recipient's road, port and airport sectors. 7b. Revised Project Development Objectives/Outcomes [if applicable]
Revisions to the Results Framework Comments/ Rationale for Change PDO Current (PAD) Proposed Rehabilitate selected priority roads, port and airport facilities; and to support the regulatory and institutional reform and effective management of the road, port and airport sectors. Unchanged. PDO indicators Current (PAD) Proposed change* Reduction in travel time on project roads; Increase in usage of the project road; Average distance traveled increases Number of person-days of employment generated by Project Road Construction and Maintenance; Prioritized programmed maintenance is established. Roads in good and fair condition as a share of total classified roads (%) (core indicator); Share of rural population with access to an all-season road (%) (core indicator); [Supplemental information: Number of rural people with access to an all-season road] Second Generation Road Maintenance Fund is created and functioning (yes/no). The proposed change includes the mandatory, core transport sector indicators. These indicators are also more suitable to capture impact on PDO Improved port performance n handling Port Container; Increase in port ships daily handling performance; Mandatory environmental and safety measures as agreed under the International Convention for Prevention of Maritime Pollution are addressed; Significant reduction in SLPA staff; Increase in financial surplus for SLPA after depreciation and financial charges and before tax. Port Container handling capacity (TEUs/day); Port Break-bulk handling capacity (T/day); SLPA Staff cost to annual expenditure ratio (%). Streamlined wording of indicators. Airport complies with ICAO mandated Unchanged.
Table 2: REVISED PROJECT RESULTS FRAMEWORK AND MONITORING Project Development Objective (PDO): Rehabilitate selected priority roads, port and airport facilities; and to support the regulatory and institutional reform and effective management of the road, port and airport sectors. PDO Level Results Indicators Core Unit of Baseline Original Project Start (2008) Progress To Date (2011) Cumulative Target Values Frequency Data Source/ Methodology Responsibility for Data Collection Comments 2011 2012 2013 Roads in good and fair condition as a share of total classified roads (core network) 1 % 60% annual IRI survey and road database SLRA Share of rural population with access to an all-season road (Supplemental information: Number of rural people with access to an all-season road). % Number 28% (987,631) annual survey SLRA Second Generation Road Maintenance Fund is created and functioning. (yes or no) no yes (IRMF Created) yes - - CMU Port Container handling capacity. 1 7TEU/hr annual reports SLPA Port Break-bulk handling capacity.1 T/day 895T/day annual reports SLPA SLPA Staff cost to annual expenditure ratio.1 % annual reports SLPA Airport complies with ICAO mandatory standards. (yes or no) no yes yes - - SLAA Beneficiaries Direct Project Beneficiaries, Of which female. 1 Number % 0 End of Project study CMU
ANNEX 2: Reallocation of Proceeds Sierra Leone Infrastructure Development Project Table 1: Current Allocation of Proceeds Category Amount of the Original Grant (H1910-SL) Allocated (Expressed in SDR Equivalent) Amount of the Additional Grant (H4050-SL) Allocated (Expressed in SDR Equivalent) Amount of the Additional Credit (44690-SL) Allocated (Expressed in SDR Equivalent) % of Expenditures to be Financed 1 Works (a) SLRA (b) SLPA (c) SLAA 13,996,000 600,000 8,650,000 3,200,000 0 0 1,100,000 2,500,000 0 100% 80% 90% 2 Goods (a) SLRA (b) SLPA (c) SLAA (d) CMU 0 430,000 1,500,000 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100% 80% 90% 3 Consultants’ services, including audits (a) SLRA (b) SLPA (c) SLAA (d) CMU 2,004,000 650,000 515,000 859,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 100% 4 Training 650,000 0 0 100% 5 Operating Costs (CMU) 270,000 0 0 100% 6 Refunding of Project Preparation Advance 216,000 0 0 Amount due pursuant to Section 2.02 (c) of this Agreement 7 Unallocated 0 0 0 Sub-totals 30,400,000 3,200,000 3,700,000 TOTAL: 37,300,000 ========
Table 2: Proposed Re-Allocation of Proceeds Category Category Description Original Grant (H1910-SL) After Reallocation (XDR) Additional Grant (H4050-SL) After Reallocation (XDR) Additional Credit (44690-SL) After Reallocation (XDR) Revised Amount After Reallocation (XDR) % of Expenditures to be Financed 1-A Civil Work- SLRA 12,796,000 2,644,512 1,100,000 16,540,512 100% 1-B Civil Work- SLPA 621,000 555,488 2,500,000 3,676,488 80% 1-C Civil Work- SLAA 8,016,000 - - 8,016,000 90% 2-A Goods - SLRA - - - - 100% 2-B Goods - SLPA 334,000 - - 334,000 80% 2-C Goods- SLAA 2,066,000 - - 2,066,000 90% 2-D Goods- CMU 162,000 - - 162,000 3-A 1,995,000 - - 1,995,100 100% 3-B Consultancy-SLPA 1,835,000 - 100,000 1,935,000 100% 3-C Consultancy 654,000 - - 654,000 100% 3-D Consultancy- CMU 1,006,000 - - 1,006,000 100% 4 Training 405,000 - - 405,000 100% 5 Operating Cost CMU 294,000 - - 294,000 100% 6 PPF 216,000 - - 216,000 7 Unallocated - - - - Totals 30,400,000 3,200,000 3,700,000 37,300,000