Implement Put into practical effect; carry out. Successfully Evidence of outcome or impact of approaches / decisions taken. Sustain Maintain for a period of time relevant to the task / project NPQML Content Area Assessment Criteria Score Descriptor 0 Marks Score Descriptor 1 Mark Score Descriptor 2 Marks Supporting Documents required Tested in Part A Strategy and Improvement 1.1.1 Deploys tools and techniques to manage and analyse data on pupil progress and attainment, at group and individual level. No relevant evidence submitted by participant Deploys tools and techniques to manage and analyse data on pupil progress and attainment at group and individual level; though tools and techniques deployed and/or conclusions drawn or trends identified during analysis are not always the most important/relevant/appropriate (for specified purpose/context) Deploys appropriate tools and techniques to manage data on pupil progress and attainment at group and individual level effectively; analysis of progress and attainment accurately identifies the most important and relevant trends. Raw data analysis Evidence against criteria: Marker Comments:
1.1.2 Designs, evaluates and improves plans in light of data on pupil progress and attainment No relevant evidence submitted by participant Designs improvement project, evaluates impact and modifies plans; though priorities identified or conclusions drawn are not always consistent with data supplied on pupil progress and attainment. Designs an improvement project that identifies priorities that are wholly consistent with data supplied on pupil progress and attainment; evaluates impacts of plans robustly and makes improvements where necessary in important/relevant/appropriate respects. Evidence against criteria: Marker Comments: 1.1.3 Deploys change management tools and/or techniques during the design and implementation of plans. No relevant evidence submitted by participant Deploys change management tools and/or techniques during the design and implementation of plans; though not always the most important/relevant/appropriate (for the specified purpose/context). Change not sustained or implemented successfully. Deploys the most important/relevant/appropriate change management tools and/or techniques (for specified purpose/context) during the design and implementation of plans, to successfully implement sustainable change at team level. Evidence against criteria:
Marker Comments: 2.1.2 Evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of curriculum taught by team, implementing improvements where necessary. No relevant evidence submitted by participant Evaluates curriculum taught by team, identifying strengths and weaknesses; though improvements are not always consistent with the most important/relevant/appropriate findings of their evaluation. Comprehensively evaluates curriculum taught by team, implementing improvements that are wholly consistent with the most important/relevant/appropriate findings of their evaluation. Evidence against criteria: Marker Comments: 2.1.3 Implements and evaluates an evidence-based No relevant evidence Implements and evaluates evidence-based project within a team; though impact of Implements and evaluates evidence-based project within a team that demonstrably Pupil Performance data
project that improves pupil progress and/or attainment submitted by participant project on pupil progress and/or attainment unclear or inconsistent with specified purpose or priorities. improves pupil progress and/or attainment in line with specified purpose and priorities. Evidence against criteria: Marker Comments: Leading with Impact 3.1.1 Exploits different leadership styles and justifies why these have been adopted. No relevant evidence submitted by participant Adopts different leadership styles, though not always most important/relevant/appropriate (for specific purpose/context) Benefits and risks of approaches adopted not fully explained or justified appropriately. Adopts different leadership styles successfully to ensure that team meets objectives. Benefits and risks of different approaches fully explained and approaches adopted justified appropriately. Evidence against criteria: Marker Comments:
3.1.2 Exploits different communication styles and justifies why these have been adopted No relevant evidence submitted by participant Adopts different communication styles, though not always most important/relevant/appropriate for specified audience, purpose or context. Benefits and risks of approaches adopted not fully explained or justified appropriately Adopts different communication styles successfully, including in challenging circumstances, to communicate confidently and effectively with stakeholders. Benefits and risks of approaches adopted fully explained and justified appropriately. Evidence against criteria: Marker Comments: Working in partnership 4.1.1 Establishes relationships with others within and outside of own team, deploying appropriate structures and/or processes to mitigate against barriers. No relevant evidence submitted by participant Deploys structures and/or processes to establish relationships within and outside of own team; though not always the most important/relevant/appropriate (for specified purpose/context) Barriers to collaboration with important/relevant/appropriate Deploys appropriate/relevant structures and/or processes to overcome barriers to effective collaboration. A wide range of important/relevant/appropriate relationships successfully established within and outside of own team, including with
stakeholders collaboration not always overcome. challenging partners/stakeholders Evidence against criteria: Sponsor comments: Signature of Sponsor to verify comments : …………………………………………………………….. Date …………………… Marker comments: 4.1.2 Designs and/or delivers plans in collaboration with others within and outside of own team. No relevant evidence submitted by participant Designs and/or delivers plans in collaboration with others inside and outside of team, though not always the most important/relevant/appropriate stakeholders. Designs and/or delivers plans successfully through sustained collaboration with important/relevant/appropriate stakeholders inside and outside of team. Evidence against criteria:
Marker Comments: 5.1.2 Defines the steps required to successfully implement plans, using a project plan. No relevant evidence submitted by participant Project plan defines some of the steps required to successfully implement plans though important activities (for specified purpose/context) poorly defined or absent. Project plan defines all of the steps required to successfully implement plans. Project Plan Evidence against criteria: Marker Comments: 5.1.3 Identifies and mitigates risks in plans, using a risk register. No relevant evidence submitted by participant Risk register demonstrates that some risks in plans are identified and mitigations are in place, though risks and/or mitigations are not always the most important/relevant/appropriate (for the specified purpose). Risk register demonstrates that all important/relevant risks in plans are identified and relevant/appropriate mitigations are in place (for specified purpose/context) Risk Register Evidence against criteria:
Marker Comments: Increasing Capability 6.1.1 Assess individuals’ performance and capability methodically and identifies appropriate, targeted professional development opportunities within and beyond the school to support team. No relevant evidence submitted by participant Assesses individuals’ performance and capability identifies professional development opportunities; though these are not always the most important/relevant/appropriate opportunities (for specified purpose/context). Assessment of individuals’ performance unstructured or inconsistent with relevant guidance. Assesses individuals’ performance and capability methodically, consistent with relevant guidance. Accurately identifies most important/relevant/appropriate opportunities as well as targeted professional development opportunities within and beyond the school. (for specified purpose/context). Evidence against criteria: Marker Comments:
6.1.2 Assesses their own performance and capability methodically, identifying appropriate, targeted professional development opportunities for self. No relevant evidence submitted by participant Assesses own performance and capability; though these are not always the most important/relevant/appropriate professional development opportunities (for specified purpose/context). Assesses own performance and capability methodically, drawing on relevant tools and techniques and accurately identifying important/relevant/appropriate professional development opportunities for self. Evidence against criteria: Marker Comments: 6.1.3 Designs and implements plans to evaluate the impact and cost-effectiveness of professional development in terms of pupil outcomes No relevant evidence submitted by participant Evaluates the impact and cost-effectiveness of the professional development; though does not always relate these to important/relevant/appropriate impacts on pupils’ outcomes. Evaluates the impact and of professional development in terms of pupil outcomes, explicitly identifying the most important/relevant impacts on pupils’ outcomes. Evidence against criteria: