List of Tables 1. PROJECT SUMMARY (Conditions of Grant, clause 2.2(a)-(e) of Part A) Objectives Indicate the extent to which the Project Objectives specified in clause 3 of Part A of the Conditions of Grant were met. Where obligations established in the Conditions of Grant were not met, please identify these and provide an explanation of circumstances and consequences. Table 1: Project objectives IDENTIFIED OBJECTIVE EXTENT TO WHICH THE OBJECTIVE WAS MET Overall objective build an evidence base for the development of resources and strategies to help students manage and curate their digital footprints. An evidence base was developed through meeting the various of the project – as detailed below. investigate the digital footprint knowledge and behaviour of students from traditional and traditional backgrounds This was met through an online survey of 635 university students from 27 universities across Australia and focus groups with 30 students at the University of Newcastle. the approaches of higher education institutions in educating undergraduate students about managing and curating digital footprints for successful personal and professional outcomes A desktop audit of 45 universities in Australia was performed. This audit examined the digital footprint resources that were publicly available for students’ digital footprint education. examples of evidence informed practice for education of undergraduate students regarding digital footprint management. A Delphi survey was performed. This survey was of 53 experts in digital technology and education and sought respondents’ expertise on best practice for digital footprint management. Project Activities, Milestones and Key Performance Indicators Below, please specify whether:
all project Activities specified in Schedule 1 of the Conditions of Grant were completed all Project Milestones specified in Schedule 1 of the Conditions of Grant were completed all Key Performance Indicators specified in Schedule 1 of the Conditions of Grant were met. Where obligations established in the Conditions of Grant were not met, identify these and provide an explanation of circumstances and consequences. Table 2: Project activities, milestones and KPIs TIME FRAME PLANNED ACTIVITIES AND MILESTONES PROJECT ACTIVITIES AND MILESTONES COMPLETED IDENTIFIED KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS OUTCOME January – March 2015 Develop risk assessment and mitigation strategy Risk assessment and mitigation strategy developed Risk assessment and mitigation strategy Risk assessment and mitigation strategy in place Develop communication and dissemination strategy Communication and dissemination strategy developed Key conferences and journal identified for publication of results AARE and GAPS conferences were identified and 3 journals; Journal of Education and Work, Education and Digital Culture, Studies in Higher Education; as being suitable for publication of project results. Establish project website and social media presence Website () developed. Social media presence established Website hits increase. Number of social media followers grows. -Website usage is increasing and social media coverage is growing via Twitter and Facebook. Development of student survey and focus group schedule and submission for ethics approval Ethics approval granted. Approval number Instruments developed. Ethics approval granted. Met Literature review Literature review completed Literature review to be published online on the project website as a freely available downloadable pdf. Under review for publication as an annotated bibliography April – June 2015 Recruitment for student survey and focus groups Online student survey conducted. Focus groups conducted. 635 students surveyed. Focus groups All survey and focus group data collected