1. Section 745 Issues CFC argued that the residential tenure requirements for seniors living at a particular customer location had not been fully established, and should be during the proceeding. CFC argued that bill protection is only really effective if the participation rate (enrollees as a % of eligible customers) is sufficiently high. CFC recommended improved outreach to improve enrollment. PHC Statement of CFC as Requested in the Requested in the Sep. 30, 2016 ALJ’s Ruling Inviting PHC Statements and Setting Next Steps Following the September 12, 2016 ME&O Workshop, p.3 Opening Brief of CFC as Requested in the Oct. 15, 2015 ALJ Scoping Memo and Ruling for Phase 3, pp. 2-3. Comments of CFC on the PD on the Requirements of CA Public Utilities Code Section 745 for Default TOU Rates for Residential Customers, pp. 2-4. Opening Brief of CFC on the Commission’s Examination of PUCode Section 745 Issues, pp. 1-2. D.16-09-016, pp. 1011. D. 17-09-036, p. 11. PHC Statement of CFC as Requested in the Requested in the Sep. 30, 2016 ALJ’s Ruling Inviting PHC Statements and Setting Next Steps Following the September 12, 2016 ME&O Workshop, pp. 1-2. Verified; However, CFC Foundation’s contributions to D.16-09-016 were duplicative of contributions made by other intervenors such as Center for Accessible Technology, The Utility Reform Network, and Utility Consumers Action Network. This duplication is underscored by the fact that the only reference to CFC Foundation in the discussion sections of D.16-09-016 states that “numerous parties (TURN, CforAT, UCAN, CFC) objected to the exclusion of customers who are eligible but not enrolled in these programs.” In addition, the following references did not appear to be relevant: Opening Brief of CFC on the Commission’s Examination of PUCode Section 745 Issues, pp. 1-2 (notably, CFC cites “Nexant findings” yet, at the time this brief was filed, Nexant had not made any findings); 10-11.
Tony Roberts 2017 8 $138 Resolution ALJ-329 $1104 5 $120 $600.00 Subtotal: $2,034 Subtotal: $1,220.00 TOTAL REQUEST: $99,053.50 TOTAL AWARD: $54,085.00 *We remind all intervenors that Commission staff may audit the records and books of the intervenors to the extent necessary to verify the basis for the award (§1804(d)). Intervenors must make and retain adequate accounting and other documentation to support all claims for intervenor compensation. Intervenor’s records should identify specific issues for which it seeks compensation, the actual time spent by each employee or consultant, the applicable hourly rates, fees paid to consultants and any other costs for which compensation was claimed. The records pertaining to an award of compensation shall be retained for at least three years from the date of the final decision making the award. **Travel and Reasonable Claim preparation time are typically compensated at ½ of preparer’s normal hourly rate ATTORNEY INFORMATION Attorney Date Admitted to CA BAR Member Number Actions Affecting Eligibility (Yes/No?) If “Yes”, attach explanation Nicole Johnson June 2006 242625 No Attachments Documenting Specific Claim and Comments on Part III: Attachment or Comment # Description/Comment 1. Certificate of Service 2. Nicole Johnson Timesheet 3. Tony Roberts Timesheet 4. CFC proposes an hourly rate for Mr. Roberts of $275. Justification for Tony Roberts’s Rate (Originally submitted to the Commission in CFC’s IComp claim for Proceeding A1509001) CFC arrived at this recommended rate on the basis of the combination of Mr. Roberts’s experience and training, modelled on rates approved for TURN experts. I. Experience Basis Mr. Roberts has 22 years of experience as an practicing
The comment period for today’s decision is not waived. This decision is effective today. Dated September 27, 2018, at Sacramento, California. MICHAEL PICKER President CARLA J. PETERMAN LIANE M. RANDOLPH MARTHA GUZMAN ACEVES CLIFFORD RECHTSCHAFFEN Commissioners