zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
within CLUES has been broadly applied throughout New Zealand (Elliott et al., 2005), particularly for E. coli estimation (Elliott et al., 2014), and its development involved extensive communication with the developers of the original estimation procedure in the U. S. A. (Elliott et al., 2014). The suitability of this approach for estimating baseline microbial loads and its previous application, both in the study region and throughout New Zealand, are key reasons why this method has been selected. Another key justification for using the CLUES model is that there appears to be no alternative estimation procedures that are readily available for predicting E. coli concentrations in the New Zealand water-management context. In addition, alternative means of estimating E. coli loads—such as generating mean loads per land use type and then aggregating these up to the catchment level utilising data regarding the amount of area present in each land use (NIWA, 2010)—are less structured (and hence are necessarily more heuristic) and also create the possibility that values observed on-farm are inconsistent with those concentrations observed at monitoring stations throughout the catchment. The current sets of mitigation options evaluated in the model are very focused on the management of nitrogen loss. These mitigations generally have less effect on the loads of other contaminants (phosphorus, sediment, and E. coli). Levels of current adoption, potential adoption, cost, and the efficacy (proportional reduction in contaminant loss associated with the use of the mitigation) of these additional mitigations are the focus of an upcoming workshop and subsequent work streams. Critical information here concerns the level of effectiveness of the given mitigation practices, as these will modify the baseline loads that have been estimated for agricultural land across the catchment, and thus modify the concentrations of the contaminants observed in the waterways. The focus of the upcoming workshop (28–29 January 2015) is to: Brainstorm practices available to reduce the loading of a certain contaminant to water ways. Evaluate the list of practices that has been generated, and delete those that are regarded as unlikely to be broadly suitable for mitigation purposes. Identify the extent to which these practices could be broadly adopted for mitigation purposes.
Windrum, P., Fagiolo, G., and Alessio, M. (2007), ‘Empirical validation of agent-based models: alternatives and prospects', Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 10, URL: http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/10/2/8.html.
Pipe penetration where there is no steel sleeve or cast in place fire stopping device/sleeve, provide 2”x 2” x 1/8” galvanized steel angles fastened to floor surrounding the penetration or group of penetrations to prevent water from getting to penetration. Provide urethane caulk between angles and floor and fasten angles to floor minimum 8” on center. Seal corners water tight with urethane caulk. Floors subject to water intrusion or rooms housing electrical equipment include the following locations: Food Service/Kitchen Areas Walk In Coolers/Freezers Laundries Restrooms Locker/Shower Rooms Janitor Rooms w/ Sinks Wet Laboratories Mechanical/Plumbing Equipment Rooms Swimming Pool Rooms/Pool Equipment Rooms Chemical/Hazardous Waste Storage Maintenance/Industrial Shops Vehicle Storage and Parking Ramps Greenhouses Data/Telecommunications Rooms Electrical Equipment Rooms Edit the above list for each project. Add other locations where appropriate. Consultant shall coordinate details on drawings with the above sleeve specification. Provide waterproof caulk sealant top coating on fire stopping system (or other approved means to protect the fire stopping system from water) in areas subject to wash down such as Food Service and Dish Washing Areas. AGENCY TRAINING All training provided for agency shall comply with the format, general content requirements and submission guidelines specified under Section 01 91 01 or 01 91 02. END OF SECTION
2 (d) What action measures were achieved to ‘encourage others’ to promote the two duties: Encourage others Action Measures Outputs Outcome / Impact 1 2 3 4 2 (e) Please outline any additional action measures that were fully achieved other than those listed in the tables above:
Action Measures fully implemented (other than Training and specific public life measures) Outputs Outcomes / Impact 1 2 3 3. Please outline what action measures have been partly achieved as follows: Action Measures partly achieved Milestones / Outputs Outcomes/Impacts Reasons not fully achieved 1 2
Negative Responses Date Found Found By Location Reason for Negative Response Resolved Date Resolved Resolution YES / NO YES / NO YES / NO YES / NO YES / NO B) PIPING INSTALLATION CHECKS Date Description of Work Performed % Complete Initials Questions (See details below) 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO CHECKLIST GROUP COMPLETE INITIALS: DATE: Question Details Piping is free to expand and contract without noise or damage to hangers, joints, or the building. Joint compound or tape is only applied on male threads. Piping is installed with sufficient pitch and arranged in a manner to ensure drainage of entire system. Changes in pipe sizes are made with the proper size reducing fittings, reducing elbow or reducing tees, and no bushings are utilized. Connections between dissimilar pipe materials are made with dielectric fittings. Pipe hanger spacing complies with specification requirements.
Site: Home Visitor Name: Month: Date: Child's Name (Last, First) M T W Th F M T W Th F Notes/Follow-up/Action Taken: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Documenting Absences: Note: Absent Codes will all be NUMBERS Codes Present= use the letter code for Health check Absent Codes 0 = Not Scheduled 1= Approved Leave Of Absence 2= Bereavement 3. Doctor/Dentist Appointment 11= Unexcused Absence 4= Family Situation 5= Illness 6= Hospital 12= Canceled (snow, power outage, water outage, fire, etc.) 7= Injury 8= Parent Appointment 9= No Transportation 10= No one available for pick-up or drop-off 15 = Socialization Time Conflict (Other than work) 16= Work Conflict 17= Personal Reason, would not like to attend 18= unable to attend due to weather conditions
2 The learner will be able to comply with the health and safety, business or organisational requirements The learner must be able to: Assessment Requirements Evidence Location 2.a Work within the business or organisational requirements The majority of the evidence for this standard should be from observation of the learner’s performance in the workplace. The following assessment methods must be used in the assessment of this standard: Observation of learner practical ability The following assessment methods can be used in the assessment of this standard: Written tasks/questions and answers Learner log/reflective journal Expert witness evidence Learner’s own products (i.e. work products and records) Professional discussion 2.b Identify key aspects of relevant codes of conduct and best practice 2.c Identify how to deal with used chemicals in accordance with workplace, environmental and financial requirements 2.d Identify relevant sources of information to update knowledge and skills relevant to own work 2.e Check that a risk assessment has been completed and is available 2.f Wear any necessary Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) as required 2.g Deal with any chemical spillages safely in accordance with the risk assessment
Programmable logic controller Principles and Application, by John Webb (2005). Manual_s7-1200 (manual for Siemens s7-1200 PLC). Implementation of a test system based on OPC Server for development of electronic speed governor in Gezende HEPP by and OPC server implementation with MMS over Ethernet by , and Chatelanat, S. Ethernet Controlled Motor via PLC using Lab view, by Nader N. Barsoum, and Pin Rui Chin. Distance-Learning Remote Laboratories using LabVIEW from ni.com. Remote control and host LabVIEW page from lavag.org.
Annex Schedule of meetings in 2018 of the Task Force on Subsidiarity, Proportionality and Doing Less More Efficiently Indicative date Provisional agenda items 25 January Discuss and agree working methods; Appointment of experts Discussion about members' expectations and views on issues to be addressed by the Task Force. Scoping out the work of the Task Force including advice to be sought from the Secretariat and other sources; A bibliography of key documents will be made available to the Task Force 23 February Task (c) Take stock of how local and regional authorities are currently involved in the preparation and follow-up of Union policies and legislation; Identify possible improvements to strengthen the involvement of local and regional authorities. 22 March Task (a) Take stock of how the principle of subsidiarity is currently applied in the work of the European Commission, the European Parliament and the Council; Take stock of how the principle of proportionality is currently applied in the work of the European Commission, the European Parliament and the Council; Identify potential improvements to procedures or analyses which strengthen the role of subsidiarity and proportionality in the work of the institutions. 27 April Task (b) How to identify policies and legislation where responsibility could be transferred from the EU level to the Member States; How to identify policies and legislation which are not proportionate to the objectives they aim to achieve. 28 May Task (b) Identify specific policies and legislation where responsibility could be transferred from the EU level to the Member States; Identify specific Union actions that where more proportionate approaches may be desirable. 21 June Finalise Final Report of the Task Force 28 June Finalise Final Report of the Task Force
Chen Lily National Institute of Standards and Technologies (NIST) Chasko Stephen Landis+Gyr KAMBAYASHI TORU Toshiba Corporation Khatibi Farrokh Qualcomm Yoshikazu Hanatani Toshiba Corporation Ohba Yoshihiro TOSHIBA Corporation Park Hyunho Electronics and Telecommunications Research Instititute (ETRI) Perkins Charles Futurewei Technologies Lee Hyeong-Ho Electronics and Telecommunications Research Instititute (ETRI) Liu Dapeng China Mobile Randall Karen NSA/ISD Valentine Aikens Western Digital Corporation
# Output O: List of (S, minr, maxr): # S: Subtrees covering the group. # minr: Lower bound of Subgroup Range # maxr: Upper bound of Subgroup Range O=[] S=[] depth=int(math.log(len(T)+1,2)-1) def rightmost_leaf_number(n): # Input n: subtree root node # Output y: rightmost leaf number under the subtree h=n.index.len # hierarchy level of node n x=int(n.index.val, 2) # node index in decimal y=(x+1)*(2**(depth-h))-1 return y def check(n): # Input n: subtree root node # Output 0, 1 # 0 : Some node in the subtree is a non-member of the group. # 1 : All nodes in the subtree are members of the group. global minr rv=0 if n.left==None and n.right==None: # n is leaf if n.index.val in I: S.append(n) return 1 return 0 # n is non-leaf
MIS_D2D_Connection MIS_D2D_Connection.request MIS_D2D_Connection.confirm MIS_D2D_Connection.indication MIS_D2D_Connection.response MIS_Get_Information * Parameters and information elements will be added for D2D communication service. MIS_LINK_SAP primitives Link_D2D_ Link_D2D_.request Link_D2D_.confirm Link_ D2D_.indication Link_ D2D_.response Link_D2D_Connection Link_D2D_Connection.request Link_D2D_Connection.confirm Link_D2D_Connection.indication Link_D2D_Connection.response Service specific protocol features
IEEE 802.21 Session #85 – Warsaw, Poland Agenda* Monday (May 07, 2018) Tuesday (May 08, 2018) Wednesday (May 09, 2018) Thursday (May 10, 2018) AM-1 8:00-9:00a IEEE 802 Wireless Opening Plenary N/A N/A N/A AM-2 10:30-12:30 N/A IG Session IG Session IG Session PM-1 1:30 – 3:30p WG Opening Plenary 802 JTC1/SC6 Ad Hoc IG Session WG Closing Plenary PM-2 4:00 – 6:00p NA WG Session N/A NA Eve 6:00-10:30p NA IEEE 802 Wireless Social (6:30 – 9:00p) NA Monday, May 07, 2018, 8:00 am – 3.30 pm # Subject Time 1.0 IEEE 802 Wireless Opening Plenary Subir Das on behalf of WG 8:00a Break Group 9:00a 2.0 802.21 WG Opening Plenary: Meeting Called to Order Subir Das 1:30p 2.1 Agenda bashing for May 2018 Meeting Subir Das 1:35p 2.2 Introduction and other Logistics Information Subir Das 1:40p 2.3 Review of Objectives for this Session Subir Das 1:50p 2.4 Approval of March 2018 Meeting Minutes Subir Das 2.00p 3.6 Future meeting logistics Subir Das 2:10p 3.7 802 Wireless Meeting Summary Subir Das 2:20p 4.0 ISO/IEC/IEEE FDIS 8802-21-1Ballot Results Subir Das 2:30p 5.0 ISO/IEC/IEEE FDIS 8802-21-1Ballot Response Subir Das 2:45p
comes to class with all needed materials Cooperation and Participation Participates in and contributes to class and group activities This skill addresses your ability to cooperate with teachers and peers and to be personally involved in classroom or group activities. This skill also addresses your ability to participate positively in a common activity and contribute to the discussion in an appropriate manner. Achievement in this area has a direct correlation with success when working independently or in groups. A student who is meeting expectations in this area demonstrates the following characteristics: Follows instructions for the activity Is engaged in classroom activities Willingly accomplishes tasks with others Balances listening and offering own opinion Listens to understand others without interrupting others This skill addresses your ability to actively listen to learn and understand others’ ideas and diverse viewpoints without interrupting. A student who is meeting expectations in this area demonstrates the following characteristics: Actively listens to others without interruption Asks questions to increase understanding Respects the ideas, opinions, and property of others This skill addresses your ability to value the thinking, property and viewpoints of others. This skill focuses on your ability to respect others in the same way you would want to be respected. A student who is meeting expectations in this area demonstrates the following characteristics Encourages others to voice their viewpoint without judgment Shows support for differing ideas Asks for permission before using others’ things
P1 Hydrological regime Short Term – Medium Term Wetland wetting frequency, flushing frequency and flushing volume are maintained as follows: From Tilleard and Ladson (2010); note that larger flushing volumes (~20GL) are identified as being needed for Dowd and the Heart Morasses following saline flood events in the Lake Wellington system (for example, when the wetlands are filled with saline water from Lake Wellington and this corresponds with low flows in the Latrobe River). Refer to LAC for details. Values measured at existing gauging stations in the lower reaches of the Rivers or otherwise in the wetlands themselves. LAC have been identified for these wetlands on the basis that they are the best indicators of freshwater flows into the broader system. Level C - LAC based on Tilleard and Ladson (2010) ‘Hydrological Analyses to Support Determination of Environmental Water Requirements in the ’. This is a threshold-based LAC that is based on modeling and ecological assessments. Note that these values should be considered as indicative only at this stage, and should be constantly reviewed. Tilleard and Ladson (2010) indicate no work has been done for wetlands on the Mitchell (Macleod Morass); McLennan Straits ( , ); or . C1 – C8 S1, S2 P2 Waterbird breeding Short Term Abandonment or significant decline (greater than 50 per cent) in the productivity of two or more representative breeding sites (based on two sampling episodes over a five year period) within any of the following site groupings: , and - Australian pelican. Bunga Arm and – little tern and fairy tern. Macleod Morass, Sale Common and Dowd Morass – black swan, Australian white ibis, straw-necked ibis, and little black cormorant. Recommended baseline monitoring program should comprise a minimum two annual sampling periods separated by at least one year (and within a 5 year period). Level C - The use of the site by these species is well documented. However, there are no empirical data describing breeding rates. Baseline data will need to be collected to assess this LAC. C6 Critical Services/Benefits
Thanks for your generous support of the parish over the past year…… Offertory collections….. January 5 12 19 26 February 2 9 16 23 March 2 9 16 23 30 April 6 13 20 27 May 4 11 18 25 June 1 8 15 22 29 July 6 13 20 27 August 3 10 17 24 31 September 7 14 21 29 October 5 12 19 26 November 2 9 16 23 30 December 7 14 21 28 SVP January February March April May June July August September October November December CAFOD January February March April May June July August September October November December
11.8 MF agreed to liaise the LDC feedback regarding the antibiotics prescribing percentage range back to the joint working group. MF 12 12.1 LDC Conference GW explained that the next LDC Conference is being held in Birmingham on 8/9 June 2017. Two representatives are invited to attend from Somerset. GW asked if any of the members of the LDC wanted to attend the conference. Both GW and AL agreed to attend the LDC Conference. GW/AL 12 12.1 12.1.1 12.2 12.2.1 12.3 12.3.1 12.4 12.4.1 Any Other Business The KIT Scheme (Maternity) AL asked LS if The KIT Scheme still exists in Somerset. LS advised that the KIT Scheme has ceased to exist but Jane Moore still provides a back into Practice scheme as a form of informal support. AL agreed to liaise with Jane Moore. Somerset Safe House The LDC questioned whether the Safe House still has any trade and if the LDC require a representative within the scheme. LS was previously a representative on the Somerset Safe House but has since stepped down from this role. GW agreed to contact the organisers at the Somerset Safe House to confirm if representation is required. Occupational Health VS advised that a letter has been sent around from Occupational Health that the contract has been issued to a new Organisation commencing from 1 April 2017. Replacement Retainers GI advised there has been an issue with the local district hospital advising patients that the Practitioners can replace retainers. GI contacted the BSA who explained a Practitioner cannot claim for a retainer if they do not have a UOA contract. SA explained that normally the first retainer is free and then have to pay for the second breakage. MF has spoken to the Chair of the Orthodontic South-West, Joseph McGill, and they are going to agree a unified approach across the South-West regarding retainers. AL GW 13 13.1 Date of Next Meeting The next Somerset LDC meeting was agreed to be held on Tuesday 13 June 2017 at The Hankridge Arms, Taunton at 19.30. EC will inform the LDC via email of the final meeting venue. EC
a) with a trunk circumference of 180 centimetres or greater measured at its base; or b) with a trunk circumference of 140 centimetres or greater measured at 1.5 metres above its base; or c) listed on the Significant Tree Register. Please contact the Council Arborists on 8290 1333 to ascertain if permission is required for tree removal or pruning or for further information and protection of trees during construction works. C. Nothing in the permit hereby issued may be construed to allow the removal of, damage to or pruning of any street tree without the further written consent of the Stonnington City Council. Contact the Council Arborists on 8290 1333 for further information. D. At the permit issue date, Section 69 of the Planning and Environment Act 1987 stated that the Responsible Authority may extend the periods referred to if a request is made in writing within the following timeframes: i. Before or within 6 months after the permit expiry date, where the development allowed by the permit has not yet started; and ii. Within 12 months after the permit expiry date, where the development allowed by the permit has lawfully started before the permit expires.
D. The crossover must be constructed to Council’s Standard Vehicle Crossover Guidelines unless otherwise approved by the Responsible Authority. Separate consent for crossovers is required from Council’s Building and Local Law Unit. E. Nothing in this permit hereby issued shall be construed to allow the removal of, damage to or pruning of a significant tree (including the roots) without the further written approval of Council. “Significant tree” means a tree: a) with a trunk circumference of 180 centimetres or greater measured at its base; or b) with a trunk circumference of 140 centimetres or greater measured at 1.5 metres above its base; or c) listed on the Significant Tree Register. Please contact the Council Arborists on 8290 1333 to ascertain if permission is required for tree removal or pruning or for further information and protection of trees during construction works. F. At the permit issue date, Section 69 of the Planning and Environment Act 1987 stated that the Responsible Authority may extend the periods referred to if a request is made in writing within the following timeframes: i. Before or within 6 months after the permit expiry date, where the development allowed by the permit has not yet started; and ii. Within 12 months after the permit expiry date, where the development allowed by the permit has lawfully started before the permit expires.
Designated Governor Gillian von Fragstein Development Days Prevent Safeguarding As above Headteacher Kevin Grtton Keeping Children Safe in Education Development Day Safer Recruitment Safeguarding Training/Keeping Children Safe in Education 2016 Prevent DSCB Derby CIty Safer Recruitment in Education Derby City 28 September 2015 25 November 2015 15 October 2015 19 July 2016 Nov 2015 Designated Safeguarding lead Matt Shenton Everybody’s Business Keeping Children Safe in Education 2016 2017 2016 Designated Teacher for Looked After Children Penny Brunt Child Sexual Exploitation – Working Families EPEP Training Network Meeting (LACS) Keeping Children Safe in Education Safe and Sound Derby City Council Derby City Council 2 March 2015 July 2015 3 times per year City wide Sept 2015 VENCO Helen Cwynar Early Help Everybody’s Business Child Sexual Abuse Forced Marriage and Honour Based Violence Keeping Children Safe in Education Derby City DSCB DSCB DSCB 15 January 2016 15 March 2016 01.03.2017 05.10.2016 Sept 2016 Safeguarding Officer Angela Jordan Everybody’s Business Child Sexual Exploitation Alcohol and Substance Misuse by parents Early Help DSCB DSCB DSCB Derby City 06.12.2016 28.10.2016 14.12.2016 21.10.2016 Safeguarding Officer in Training Everybody’s Business Keeping Children Safe in Education DSCB August 2017 September 2016 Other staff with Safeguarding responsibilities Safer Recruitment in Education Helen Bounds Andrew Muldoon Keeping Children Safe in Education Whole School Training NPS Training (House Administrator) NSPCC 15.10.15 Designated Safeguarding Team 15 October 2015 28 September 2015 19 February 2016
Appendix 9 Dates of Staff training and details of course title/training provider Please see DCSB Training Pathways for Education Providers on for recommended training Role Course Title Training Provider Date/s Governing Body Development Day Sherri Medcalf Andrew Hall Frankie Goss Derby City Council Derby City Governor March 2015 March 2015 March 2015 25 November 2015 Designated Governor Safeguarding Training Kathy Hughes Think Family Governor to be appointed as at Sept 2016 Derby City Council Level Training 25 November 2015 24th April 2015 Headteacher Keeping Children Safe in Education Development Day Safer Recruitment Safeguarding Training/Keeping Children Safe in Education 2016 DSCB Derby CIty Safer Recruitment in Education Derby City 28 September 2015 25 November 2015 15 October 2015 19 July 2016 Designated Safeguarding lead Keeping Children Safe in Education Safeguarding Children in Educational Settings – Level 3 Engaging Vulnerable Young People NPS Training Induction for CSE Champion Self-Harm and Suicide DSCB Children Matter Consultancy Safe and Sound Derby Safeguarding Board 17 Sept 2015 18 October 2013 3 June 2014 19 February 2016 26 February 2016 21 April 2016
When spouses, intimate partners, or dates use physical violence, threats, emotional abuse, harassment, or stalking to control the behavior of their partners, they are committing domestic violence. Physical violence includes putting your hands on a person against their will. It also includes shoving, pushing, grabbing, pulling, or forcing someone to stay somewhere. Regardless of the relationship between two people, using physical violence against someone is a crime. Very few people identify themselves as abusers or victims. They may remain silent about the issue because of the havoc that domestic violence has created in their workplace and family lives. Victims may be silent about the abuse because of embarrassment or shame, or for fear that their batterers will hurt them if they tell other people about the violence. Abusers may minimize their actions or blame the victims for provoking the violence. Both victims and abusers may characterize their experiences as family quarrels that "got out of control." Observations Injuries that are inconsistent with description of cause Painful vaginal exams Victim / partner behavior Delay in presenting (old bruises) Comments about emotional abuse Any injury during pregnancy: Ask: "Are those injuries due to physical abuse?; Has someone been hurting you?" Avoid Harmful Assumptions There are no typical characteristics or profiles of abusers or victims. Abusers may appear very charming or may seem like explosive or angry individuals. Victims may seem extremely frightened or passive or may be quite angry about what is happening. Rather than determining whether someone fits a "type," determine whether the warning signs of abuse exist. If someone declines to discuss domestic violence issues, consider whether the silence may be due to a fear of the perpetrator, or to cultural, race or gender issues which make it difficult to talk about such personal experiences. Responses: If you suspect that someone is a victim of domestic violence, say the following: I am concerned about your safety. You can talk to me about what is happening at home. Domestic violence can harm your children.
controls. Spent process fluid discharged to wastewater. Product applied in aqueous process solution with negligible volatilization. Substance Use Rate The substance maximum use rate in a typical operation (MSPERC) is 100 kg/d 10 mg/L is a typical water treatment chemical (e.g., polyacrylamide) usage concentration (OECD, 2004)1 At an assumed flow rate of 10000 m3/d, and usage concentration of10 mg/L, the substance use rate is 100 kg/d Days Emitting 300 days/year Industry knowledge* None Environmental Parameters for Fate Calculation Assumed dilution factor in freshwater is 10. For marine assessments an additional tenfold dilution is assumed, i.e., dilution factor in marine water = 100. ERC default settings2 None *Assumed that water treatment chemicals are typically used consistently throughout the year. 1OECD Series on Emission Scenario Documents, Number 4. June 2004. Emission Scenario Document on Water Treatment Chemicals. 2 Characteristics of Specific ERC Justification Emission Fractions (from the process) To Air 0.05 Substances purposely released to water. Likely some loss to air for volatiles, thus, an assumed loss of 5%. Value confirmed via an air flotation unit simulated using the ToxChem+ model To Wastewater/Sewer/ Water courses 0.95 Substance purposely released to water, thus, emission factor will be near 100%.1 Value derived on basis of mass conservation, assuming 5%
properties of the substance. The standard RMMs encountered in the processes considered here typically provide removal efficiencies in excess of 80% (according to CEFIC Risk Management Library) On-site treatment of off-air RMM Upgrade of the system in place or additional air treatment measures, such as wet scrubber and/or air filtration and/or thermal oxidation and/or vapor recovery systems, in order to achieve a reduction of the air emissions Arbitrary default of this determinant value, which is set to 50%, to be overwritten by the assessor according to the required removal efficiency (assessment outcome) Air 50% Air e-w-3
2.1 The Assessment Tasks / Examinations Affected To be completed by Student School Sub-Panel Approval (staff use only) Module Code Module Title Assignment Number / Type Module Director Date assignment due Complete existing work New Assessment Full Mark or Capped Mark Revised submission date or examination date or period in which module will be repeated 2.2 Student Declaration / Programme Comments Student Declaration Programme Comments (staff use only) I confirm that I have read the guidelines on mitigating circumstances and request that the Subject Assessment Panel take into account the circumstances set out above. I understand that if I have not fully completed this form, my application will not be processed and the form will be returned to me. If you have a Disability Learning Support Plan please tick Signed (Student) Date Signed Print name / Role: Date If you have not received the signed copy of this form within 5 working days of submission, please contact your School Office If you are experiencing difficulties please be reminded that you may be able to access support from Student Services. The team are able to offer support to students for many of the issues which contribute to mitigating circumstances. Please contact them in the Holgate Student Centre or by emailing: 2.2 Cohort Lead Comments / School SAP Sub-Panel Comments School SAP Sub-Panel Comments (staff use only) School SAP Sub-Panel Signature Signed Print Name / Role Date Disability Learning Support Plan: confirm MC for additional circumstances This form, completed with the School recommendation(s), should be returned to Registry with the mark sheets by the published semester deadlines.
No issues were identified for escalation to the Quality Governance Committee / risk register / team brief. 2016.011 Any Other Business JL suggested that a representative from the Carers Hub is invited to the Forum. MA 2016.012 Date and Time of Next Meeting Wednesday, 16 March 2016 10:00 am – 12:00 pm Brampton Room, Morston House, Newcastle-under-Lyme, ST5 1QG
AGENDA Claines Parochial Church Council Meeting Wednesday 21st May, 2014 at 19:30, The Church Institute Opening prayer Apologies for absence Minutes of the previous meetings (27th Jan, 24th March 2014) Matters arising from minutes Correspondence Election of PCC and other officers Treasurer HIM Treasurer Secretary Lay Vice Chair Electoral Roll Officer Mission Resource Officer Reports - in advance please Churchwardens Report (including agree fees for searches) Revd. Jo’s Report MOG HIM Events – Jan H Deanery Synod Children and Holy Communion Presentation Portable nave altar - approval Assistant Lay Ministry - approval Safeguarding – adoption of policies Agree future dates AOB Closing Prayers The proposed dates for the next meetings are: 7th July, 17th Sept, 17th Nov, and 28th Jan at 7.30pm in the Institute with APCM date to be agreed If you would like to raise any matters related to PCC business please contact the Secretary (or Chairperson – Revd Jo) prior to the meeting. Secretary – John Brady 01905453005
support horizon scanning to identify key issues facing the future of newborn bloodspot screening highlight strategic research priorities. Programs strive to innovate and have processes in place to identify and assess new ideas, integrate them into practice within their own program and assist with integration into other state and territory programs where appropriate. Where innovation approaches and changes are implemented that affect the delivery of the program, they must be accompanied by an appropriate communication strategy. Policy Area 4: Monitoring, evaluation and review The information within this policy area is essential to ensuring screening programs are high-quality. Specifically, the following content outlines high-level policies to support national, state and territory, and operational level monitoring, evaluation and review. It articulates the need for indicators, which enable assessment of how well the programs meet their aim and objectives. It also outlines the need for a structured approach to ensure data are collected, reported and then used to inform program development. The data generated through monitoring, evaluation and review should be used to inform the steps articulated in Policy Area 3: Quality and safety; therefore, the two chapters should be read in parallel. Assessment of a program’s performance is essential for a number of reasons. First, governments and programs have an obligation to the individuals screened, and their families, to ensure that the programs continue to maximise benefits and minimise harms []. Second, governments require a program to remain effective and efficient. This requires continual assessment, as the factors that influence the viability of a program change over time. For example, the understanding of a condition can change, and new, more effective, interventions may emerge. Third, performance assessment is an essential part of the quality improvement process and therefore supports a highquality program []. Performance assessment is most effective when it occurs at all levels of a program []. In the context of newborn bloodspot screening, national monitoring provides a collective picture of the programs. It enables benchmarking and a framework within which programs can share successes and identify and manage areas of underperformance. Program-level assessment of performance is essential so that individual state and territory governments can assess the extent to which they are meeting their commitment to the public and the programs are delivering value for money. Operational-level assessment is essential to monitor and manage the functional aspects of a program. Across each of these levels, to gain an accurate understanding of the programs, it is necessary to consider trends to assess their performance over time [].
Dear Parents And so another year draws to a close, where has it gone??? Firstly I would like to thank all of the parents, carers and grandparents for your continued support. It’s been a busy year and we’ve needed your help and input on many occasion. We really appreciate all you do. I’d like to thank all the staff for the many extra miles they all go so that your children have many opportunities here at Front Street. Without Mr Hollingworth and Miss Routledge sport would be non-existent. Our amazing choir has performed brilliantly thanks to Miss Walker, Miss Scott and Miss Donkin. We’ve had shows, events, visits and we’ve won many awards, this is down to my amazing team! Thank you to the governors too. Lastly I’d like to thank the children for all their hard work this year. I’m proud of you all!! I hope you all have a great summer and look forward to seeing you all on TUESDAY 5TH SEPTEMBER. Farewells Today we say goodbye to Mr Robson. We wish him the best of luck for his new teaching job and I’m sure we will hear how well he is doing in the future. Goodbye & Good Luck to the amazing Year 6 students. Their talents are never ending and I know that each and every one of them will continue to do really well next year. Front Street won’t be the same without you. They were all fantastic in the Leavers’ Show today. Well done to the Year 6 staff for making the year so successful! Year 6 you had a fantastic Leavers’ Party, thank you to the team of parents who worked behind the scenes to make it so special for you. Make sure you take a look at the many photos on the website. Good Luck to you all!! Attendance Well done to all 49 children who have received a medal today in recognition of 100% attendance for the entire school year. School Meals From September a school meal will cost £2.20 each day and £11 per week. You should have received a letter about this earlier this week. WE WILL BE CASHLESS FROM SEPTEMBER SO PAYMENTS WILL NEED TO BE MADE THROUGH OUR AGORA SYSTEM. YOU SHOULD HAVE RECEIVED YOUR PASSWORD
A The first letter in relapse stands for Principle 7 itself: RESERVE a daily quiet time with God for self-examination, Bible reading, and prayer in order to know God and His will for my life and gain the power to follow His will. When life gets tough, it’s easy to slip back into our old hurts, hang-ups, and habits. The alcoholic goes back to drinking, the overeater gains the weight back, the gambler goes back to “lost wages” (Las Vegas), the workaholic fills up his schedule, the codependent goes back to an unhealthy relationship. The list goes on and on. The first step in preventing a relapse is to admit that you will be tempted, that you are not above temptation. Jesus wasn’t, why should you be? We find the account of Jesus’ temptation in Matthew 4:1–11 (tlb): Jesus was led out into the wilderness to be tempted there by Satan.... For forty days and forty nights he ate nothing and became very hungry. Then Satan tempted him to get food by changing stones into loaves of bread. “It will prove you are the Son of God,” he said. But Jesus told him, “No! For the Scriptures tell us that bread won’t feed men’s souls: obedience to every word of God is what we need.” Then Satan took him to Jerusalem to the roof of the Temple. “Jump off,” he said, “and prove you are the Son of God.” Jesus retorted, “It also says not to put the Lord your God to a foolish test.” Next, Satan took him to the peak of a very high mountain and showed him the nations of the world and all their glory. “I’ll give it all to you,” he said, “if you will only kneel and worship me.” “Get out of here, Satan.... The Scriptures say, ‘Worship only the Lord God. Obey only him.’” Then Satan went away, and angels came and cared for Jesus. 4:1 - 11 The test was over; the devil left. Jesus was tempted. He never sinned, but He was tempted. Mark 14:38 tells us all to: Watch and pray so that you will not fall into temptation. The spirit is willing, but the body is weak. 14:38
Let’s get practical. Here are some things to do to prevent relapse: 1. Pray and read your Bible daily. Establish a specific time of day to have your “quiet time.” 2. Make attending your recovery meeting a priority. Stay close to your support team. If you find yourself saying, “I’m too busy to go to Celebrate Recovery tonight,” make time. Flee from whatever you are doing and come share your recovery. 3. Spend time with your family if they are safe. If they are not, spend time with your church family. You do not have to be alone. 4. Get involved in service. Volunteer! You don’t have to wait until you get to Principle 8 to start serving. These are just a few ideas and suggestions. Share tonight in your small groups on ways that you, with God’s help, can prevent relapse in your recovery.
III. Available Network Section Traffic Data for the Project Use all available traffic data to fill out the table, and include a reference to the source of the traffic data in the field below the table. This information should be provided for each intersection and interchange and for each section of the proposed project delineated in the traffic analysis. If the number of project sections causes this table to exceed one page, then please repeat this table on another page. SECTION (Include a separate row for each section, intersection, interchange) <ETC Year> No-Build <ETC Year> Build <Design Year> No-Build <Design Year> Build <ETC Year> No-Build <ETC Year> Build <Design Year> No-Build <Design Year> Build Annual average daily traffic (AADT) Level of Service (LOS) Truck percentage, daily or peak-hour (T) Delay (sec/veh) Average speed (mph) Other
Form 210-10 Student Support Services Consultation Notes Box 700, Rosetown, Sask., S0L 2V0 Phone: (306) 882-2677 Fax: (306) 882-3366 Toll Free: 1(866) 375-2677, www.sunwestsd.ca Reference AP 210 Services for Students with Diverse Needs Revised June 19, 2013 Level School Submit to Superintendent of Education (Student Support Teacher) When As Required School Psychologist Speech-Language Pathologist Occupational Therapist Occupational Therapist Assistant School Name Date Student Name Teacher Name Grade
Form 210-22 Student Support Services Caseload Summary Insert School Name, Address, Town, Sask., Postal Code Phone: (Number) Fax: (Number) email address if applicable Reference AP 210 Services for Students with Special Needs Revised October 30, 2017 Level School Submit to Student Support Teacher When September 30th School Name Date Student’s Name D.O.B. (mm/dd/yyyy) Grade Impact Diagnosis/ Area of Need eIIP Student Support Plan Supports (What is being done?) (See Key) Program (See key) Frequency of SST Involvement (See Key) Tech Aid (What is it?) Comments Level 1 Level 2 Level 2P Supports C - Counselling CA - Classroom Adaptations E.A. - Educational Assistant Ed. Psy. - Educational Psychologist PT/OT - Physical Therapist/Occupational Therapist R - Resource – be specific with comments S.L.P. - Speech/Language O - Other Frequency D30 - Daily (30 minutes) D45 - Daily (45 minutes) D - Daily W - Weekly Mt - Monitor Program A - Alternative B - Behavior E.A.L. - English as an Additional Language F.I.P. - Functionally Integrated I - Inclusion Md - Modified Mt - Monitor P - Pull Out Sen - Sensory S - Speech Program T - Transition (School to School, School to Work)
Form 210-22 Student Support Services Caseload Summary Insert School Name, Address, Town, Sask., Postal Code Phone: (Number) Fax: (Number) email address if applicable Reference AP 210 Services for Students with Special Needs Revised February 5, 2018 Level School Submit to Student Support Teacher When September 30th School Name Date Student’s Name D.O.B. (mm/dd/yyyy) Grade Impact Diagnosis/ Area of Need eIIP Student Support Plan DRA level Supports (What is being done?) (See Key) Program (See key) Frequency of SST (See Key) Tech Aid (What is it?) Reports on File Comments Level 1 Level 2 Level 2P Supports C - Counselling CA - Classroom Adaptations E.A. - Educational Assistant Ed. Psy. - Educational Psychologist PT/OT - Physical Therapist/Occupational Therapist R - Resource – be specific with comments S.L.P. - Speech/Language O - Other Frequency D30 - Daily (30 minutes) D45 - Daily (45 minutes) D - Daily W - Weekly Mt - Monitor Program A - Alternative B - Behavior E.A.L. - English as an Additional Language F.I.P. - Functionally Integrated I - Inclusion Md - Modified Mt - Monitor P - Pull Out Sen - Sensory L - Language Program T - Transition (School to School, School to Work) Reports on File Occupational Therapy – OT Speech Language Pathology – SLP Educational Psychology – EdPsych Outside Agency - OA
Standard Specifications/ Techniques Used Types of Tests/ Properties Measured /Range of Measurement (LOQ)* Materials/ Products Tested UV/Visible Spectrophotometer Manufacturer HACH, USA Model DR 4000U S.N 0412U0005935 In-house Method TRP-10-04 based on USEPA APHA 4500-NO3 3 mg/L Determination of nitrate Bottled Drinking Water In-house Method TRP-10-02 based on USEPA 375.4 3.5 mg/L Determination of sulfate In-house Method TRP-10-05 based on USEPA 25505 0.01 mg/L Determination of nitrite In-house Method TRP-10-01 based on USEPA 340.1 0.3 mg/L Determination of fluoride In-house Method TRP-10-03 based on USEPA 126:43459 0.01 mg/L Determination of total iron UV/Visible Spectrophotometer Manufacturer HACH, USA Model DR 2000 S.N 921100021953 In-house Method TRP-10-05 based on USEPA 25505 0.03 mg/L Determination of nitrite In-house Method TRP-10-01 based on USEPA 340.1 0.3 mg/L Determination of fluoride In-house Method TRP-10-03 based on USEPA 126:43459 0.1 mg/L Determination of total iron
Standard Specifications/ Techniques Used Types of Tests/ Properties Measured /Range of Measurement (LOQ)* Materials/ Products Tested ICP-MS Model X Series II S.N. SN02039C In-house Method TRP-10-07 based on USEPA 200.8 , Rev. 5.4:1994 Determination of metals Bottled Drinking Water LOQ (mg/l) Metal 0.002 Pb 0.924 Cd 0.289 Cu 0.100 Ba 0.965 As 0.109 Cr
Standard Specifications/ Techniques Used Types of Tests/ Properties Measured /Range of Measurement (LOQ)* Materials/ Products Tested pH meter Model HQ40D S.N 111100063131 Balance Model AB104-S S.N 1121322949 Gas chromatography Model Mass (ISQ) S.N : 620110708 S.N: 110825 BS EN 15662:2008 Determination of pesticide residues Fruits and vegetables LOQ mg/kg Pesticide 0.067 Parathion methyl 0.095 Malathion 0.050 Fenitrothion 0.058 Diazinon
available for PG&E’s use, even if CTAs procure alternate resources, and even if PG&E is able to resell such withdrawal capacity to another party. Gas would be put in storage that could be withdrawn if needed. It is not clear that for CTA Self-Managed Storage, alternative resources that PG&E or ISPs would provide would be an “alternate” to initially obtained storage that could be withdrawn, nor how such “alternate resources” would practically function. The workshops ordered in the Draft Resolution, however, will explicitly address whether and how alternative resources to CTA self-managed storage can be achieved, rather than merely accepting that it cannot be done, or can be done. Commercial Energy also acknowledges that the Draft Resolution notes D.16-06-056 did not prohibit alternate resources in the context of CTA’s Self-Managed Storage program. But it takes issue with the Draft Resolution having accepted PG&E’s proposals for the first two years of the seven-year phase-out period of PG&E-allocated storage to CTAs. Their comment contends the Draft Resolution “concludes without substantive discussion that CTAs will be limited for two years to PG&E or ISP storage.” Commercial Energy requests the Draft Resolution be revised to allow CTAs to use alternate resources, and that this be mandated, instead of the present reference to PG&E being required to file an Advice Letter in terms of “including specific mechanisms to potentially allow CTAs the use of alternate resources.” Commercial Energy also states that PG&E’s recent application A.17-11-009 proposes significant changes and downsizing of the IOU’s gas storage assets and capacity. In that context, Commercial Energy requests the Draft Resolution be withdrawn and the Self-Managed Storage program be examined as part of A.17-11-009. The second set of comments is from CTAC which contends that the Commission has erred in removing alternate resources as an option for CTAs. CTAC requests that the Draft Resolution be amended to allow alternate resources and to reduce the proposed approval from two years to one year, which would be used by PG&E to propose and implement tariff changes to provide the alternate resources option. It supports discussion