STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY FORM AY 2016-2017 Degree and Program Name: Submitted By: Please use size 10 font or larger. PART ONE What are the learning objectives? How, where, and when are they assessed? What are the expectations? What are the results? Committee/ person responsible? How are results shared? 1. English majors will think and read thoughtfully and critically. Random portfolio selection in ENG 2205 and 3300. Departmental subcommittee evaluates submissions according to holistic rubric developed in Spring 2003 and revised in Spring 2017. An exit survey developed in 2007 is administered each semester. Portfolio: Expectations are that 90% of portfolios (essays from ENG 3300) will be in the top three categories. Expectations are the sophomore portfolios will serve as a baseline. Exit Survey: Expectations are that a significant majority of responses will fall in the Exceptionally, Effectively, and Satisfactorily well above the 3.0 mean). Portfolio: 94% of portfolios were assessed in the top three categories. By limiting analysis to the highest two categories, an improvement from baseline to portfolios can be seen (70% of sophomore portfolios were scored in the highest two categories compared to 71% of upper-division samples). Exit Survey: 97% of responses were in the top Undergraduate Studies Director and Committee. Results will be presented to the executive committee, shared in committee report on assessment, and discussed at faculty meeting. More specific discussions will take place among faculty who teach ENG 2205 and 3300.
category with no response below Effectively. 2. English majors will clearly, analytically, and expressively. Random portfolio selection in ENG 2205 and 3300. Departmental subcommittee evaluates submissions according to holistic rubric developed in Spring 2003 and revised in Spring 2017. An exit survey developed in 2007 is administered each semester. Portfolio: Expectations are that 90% of portfolios (essays from ENG 3300) will be in the top three categories. Expectations are the sophomore portfolios will serve as a baseline. Exit Survey: Expectations are that a significant majority of responses will fall in the Exceptionally, Effectively, and Satisfactorily well above the 3.0 mean). Portfolio: 76% of portfolios were assessed in the top three categories. By limiting analysis to the highest two categories, a decrease from baseline to portfolios can be seen (60% of sophomore portfolios were scored in the highest two categories compared to 47% of upper-division samples). Exit Survey: 95% of responses were in the top category with no response below Effectively. Undergraduate Studies Director and Committee. Results will be presented to the executive committee, shared in committee report on assessment, and discussed at faculty meeting. More specific discussions will take place among faculty who teach ENG 2205 and 3300. 3. English majors will interpret literary using appropriate critical theories and aesthetic vocabularies. Random portfolio selection in ENG 2205 and 3300. Departmental subcommittee evaluates submissions according to holistic rubric developed in Spring 2003 and revised in Spring 2017. An exit survey developed in 2007 is administered each semester. Portfolio: Expectations are that 90% of portfolios (essays from ENG 3300) will be in the top three categories. Expectations are the sophomore portfolios will serve as a Portfolio: 82% of portfolios were assessed in the top three categories. By limiting analysis to the highest two categories, a decrease from Undergraduate Studies Director and Committee. Results will be presented to the executive committee, shared in committee report on assessment, and discussed at faculty meeting. More specific discussions will take