zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
In English 372, students will demonstrate learning outcomes in “Knowledge of Human Cultures” and in “Intellectual and Practical Skills”: by engagement with key questions in literary and other cultural artifacts, and by producing written literary or cultural analysis that reflects thoughtful, informed engagement with source material and standards of evidence and argumentation in humanistic disciplines. This outcome will be assessed through review of papers written in the course, a requirement of all English GER courses, via the rubric which appears on the following page. Content Organization Mechanics & Editing Other A Highly original. Clear thesis and argument. No factual or logical inaccuracies. Minimal summary; uses evidence, not opinion; represents secondary sources accurately. Well-organized, even at paragraph level. Reader led through a logical sequence; paper stays on topic. Accurate use of citation conventions. Virtually no mechanical or formatting errors. Precise word choices; vivid, fresh language. Avoids wordiness. Informal language only when clearly appropriate. Establishes ethos strongly through knowledge of subject. Entertains, educates, and makes reader want to know more. B Less original; may have minor factual errors. May use secondary sources uncritically or with mild inaccuracy. Well-organized, but structure sometimes disjointed. Goes off-topic on occasion. Some awkwardly worded passages. Some errors, but not enough to distract the reader. Language sometime too general or less precise than the A writing. Enough errors to suggest the paper needs more polish and thought. C Relies more on summary than original interpretation or argument. Restates common or familiar arguments or interpretations uncritically. Secondary sources do not clearly contribute to or support the argument, or may be presented inaccurately. Basically well organized, though individual paragraphs may be disunified or misplaced. Logical and apparent plan overall. More frequent awkwardness, with distracting errors, although meaning is clear. Citations improperly formatted or absent. Language is competent but wordy, general, imprecise, or trite.
APPENDIX A Resolution T-17613 Frontier Lytle Creek CASF Applicant Key Information Project Name Frontier California Lytle Creek Project Project Plan The project proposes to place approximately 42,000 feet of middle mile 96 single mode fiber optic cable starting from the Lytle Creek (remote south on Lytle Creek Road) to Glen Helen Road that will use new IOF fibers to support a transport system connecting to Frontier’s core network. There will also be 56,000 feet of various sized last mile single mode fiber optic cable (24, 96 and 144 fibers) placed over existing Frontier-owned poles and rights-of-way to enable high speed Internet, Ethernet, and VoIP connectivity to 339 unserved households. Project Size (in square miles) 0.4 sq miles for middle mile / 4.0 sq miles for last mile Download/Upload speed Maximum 1 Gbps / Maximum 1 Gbps Location San Bernardino County Community Name Lytle Creek Census Block Groups 060710092022 060710092021 Median Household Income $ 78,750 Zip Codes 92358 92407 Estimated Potential Subscriber Size 339 households (2010 US Census) Applicant Expectations 271 customers (80-percent take rate) Pricing Plan (Monthly) Simply Frontier Fiber (stand-alone pricing): Min: 30 Mbps / 30 Mbps for $39.99; Max: 1 Gbps /1 Gbps for $219.99 All service options can be discounted by $15/month by bundling with voice services. Deployment Schedule (from permit approval date) 8 months Eligible Proposed Project Budget (Total) $ 1,823,607 Amount of CASF grant funds requested (100 percent) $ 1,823,607 Recommended CASF Grant (80 percent) $1,458,886 Recommended Applicant Funding (20 percent) $364,721 Recommended Grant per household passed $4,304
Uber Exercises Extensive Control Over the DaytoDay Operations of RasierCA Uber’s control over the transportation services provided by RasierCA is extensive. The evidence is undisputed that: TNC drivers who want to obtain passengers from Uber must enter into a Software License and Online Services Agreement with Uber or a Transportation Provider Service Agreement with Rasier, LLC, an Uber subsidiary. Any passenger wishing transportation service with RasierCA via the Uber App must download the passenger version of the Uber App to a smartphone and create an account with Uber. Uber ensured that “its TNC subsidiary Rasier LLC (together with RasierCA, LLC) procured a commercial insurance policy with $1 million in coverage per incident.” Wayne Ting, Uber’s General Manager, verified RasierCA’s Verified Statement in the hearing on Order to Show Cause Why RasierCA Should Not Be Held in Contempt. Uber sets the fares it charges riders unilaterally. Uber bills its riders directly for the entire amount of the fare charged. In looking at similar control over daytoday operations, courts have concluded that the subsidiary is a mere instrumentality of the parent. For example, in TohoTowa Co., Ltd. v. Morgan Creek Productions, Inc., (2013) 217 Cal. App. 4th 1096, 1109, the court held that two corporations were the alter egos of Morgan Creek International (Distributor) and thus liable for failure to pay plaintiff on a movie distribution deal. First, the court determined that there was a significant unity of interest and ownership between Distributor and Morgan Creek International LTD (Guarantor) and Morgan Creek Productions (Parent) because Parent used the two corporations as shells to avoid liability. (Id. at 1102.) The owner of the three entities made all the decisions through Parent
The Fiscal Office will send Uber a fee statement for the unpaid or underpaid PUCTRA fees, without interest or penalties. Uber shall pay the unpaid or underpaid amount within 30 days from receipt of the Fiscal Office’s payment due notification. Rulemaking 12-12-011 remains open. This order is effective today. Dated , at San Francisco, California.
Commercial Direct Install program and an Energy Advisor program for residential customers. Lancaster Choice Energy’s EE plan has forecasted cost effectiveness of 1.04 (Total Resource Cost test) and 1.07 (Program Administrator Cost). LCE’s Small Commercial Direct Install program will provide no-and low-cost EE retrofits through eligible contractors to reduce demand and energy consumption for LCE small commercial customers with peak electric demand of 200 kW or less per month. LCE will provide a free on-site assessment to eligible customers and recommend EE measures. Eligible measures will include: Light-emitting Diode lighting; Fluorescent lighting; Hi-Bay lighting; Refrigeration; Light-emitting Diode signs; Occupancy Sensors; Smart Power Strips; and Communicating Programmable Thermostats. The three-year requested budget for the Small Commercial Direct Install program is $879,322. The projected number of retrofits through the program is 775 by the end of year three, and the retrofits are estimated to save 517 kW in gross (338 kW net) and 1.9 million kWh of gross savings (1.3 million kWh net) over three years. The program has a forecasted Total Resource Cost test of 1.4 and a Program Administrator Cost test of 1.45. LCE’s Energy Advisor program will provide free information on EE products, programs and evaluation services to residential customers. The services will include telephone administered home surveys and will recommend EE upgrades or applicable programs for customers to consider enrolling in based on the survey. In addition to the telephone surveys, certain eligible customers will receive in-person audits, and the auditor will provide the customer with suggestions for EE upgrades and connect the participants with appropriate programs they are eligible to enroll in. Applicable programs not administered by LCE that the customer could be encouraged to join may include, but not be limited to, the following programs:
Week 3 (Feb. 9 & 11) -Fences -Culler: Chapter 4 -Fences Week 4 (Feb. 16 & 18) -Culler: Chapter 3 -MLA paper writing day -Marquez: “A Very Old Man with Enormous Wings,” “The Sea of Lost Time,” “Big Mama’s Funeral.” Week 5 (Feb 23 & 25) -Culler: Chapter 1 -Marquez: “The Last Voyage of the Ghost Ship,” “One Day after Saturday,” “Dialogue with the Mirror.” -Smith: “Hanwell” -Danticat: “Lélé” -Foer: “Rhoda” Week 6 (Mar 2 & 4) -Saunders: “Puppy” -Hornby: “J. Johnson” -Lethem: “Perkus Tooth” -Kunzru: “Magda Mandela” -Culler: Chapter 6 -Mitchell: “Judith Castle” -Eggers: “Theo” -Vida: “Soleil” -Toibin: “Donal Webster” -Litt “The Monster” Week 7 (Mar 9 & 11) -Conrad: “Heart of Darkness” -Conrad: “Heart of Darkness” -Achebe: “An Image of Africa” -First Paper Due Week 8 (Mar 16 & 18) SPRING BREAK SPRING BREAK
Content Organization Mechanics & Editing Other A Highly original. Clear thesis and argument. No factual or logical inaccuracies. Minimal summary; uses evidence, not opinion; represents secondary sources accurately. even at paragraph level. Reader led through a logical sequence; paper stays on topic. Accurate use of citation conventions. Virtually no mechanical or formatting errors. Precise word choices; vivid, fresh language. Avoids wordiness. Informal language only when clearly appropriate. Establishes ethos strongly through knowledge of subject. Entertains, educates, and makes reader want to know more. B Less original; may have minor factual errors. May use secondary sources uncritically or with mild inaccuracy. but structure sometimes disjointed. Goes off-topic on occasion. Some awkwardly worded passages. Some errors, but not enough to distract the reader. Language sometime too general or less precise than the A writing. Enough errors to suggest the paper needs more polish and thought. C Relies more on summary than original interpretation or argument. Restates common or familiar arguments or interpretations uncritically. Secondary sources do not clearly contribute to or support the argument, or may be presented inaccurately. Basically well organized, though individual paragraphs may be disunified or misplaced. Logical and apparent plan overall. More frequent with distracting errors, although meaning is clear. Citations improperly formatted or absent. Language is competent but wordy, general, imprecise, or trite.
WEEK 14 May 3 Read: Caryl Churchill (pp.914-15): Top Girls (pp.915-51). Contexts: from Margaret Thatcher, “Speech to the Conservative Party Conference” (pp.796-99). WEEK 15 May 10 Read: Salman Rushdie (pp.981-82): “Is Nothing Sacred?” (pp.982-89). Tony Harrison: “Them & [uz]” (p.1037). Grace Nichols: “Skanking Englishman Between Trains”, “Epilogue” (p.1048-49). Linton Kwesi Johnson: “Inglan Is a Bitch” (pp.1051-52). Gwyneth Lewis: “Mother Tongue” (pp.1053-54). Bernardine Evaristo (pp.1057-58): from Lara (pp.1058-60). Jeanette Winterson (pp.1061-62): “Lives of Saints” (pp.1062-64). Zadie Smith (p.1065): “Hanwell in Hell” (pp.1066-73). FINAL EXAM: THURSDAY, MAY 19, 12:30-2:30 PM, CURTIN 118.
MATH 098 Algebraic Literacy I (Section 003) Spring 2016 Class Location: EMS E140 Class Time: 3:30 – 4:45 p.m. Monday and Wednesday Instructor: Ian Paszkiewicz Email: Office Phone: (414) 229-2669 Office Location: Physics 123 Office Hours: 12:30 – 2:00 p.m. Tuesday 4:30 – 6:00 p.m. Thursday (and by appointment) Prerequisite: Placement level D Course Description: Algebraic Literacy I is a the first course in a two course sequence for math, science, business, nursing and engineering students integrating algebraic reasoning, modeling, and functions. This sequence satisfies the Quantitative Literacy-A Requirement, giving a student the ability to evaluate, construct and communicate arguments using quantitative methods and formal reasoning. This ability is consistent with the following Mathematical Practice (MP) standards from the Common Core: 1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. 2. Reason abstractly and quantitatively. 3. Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. 4. Model with mathematics. 5. Use appropriate tools strategically. 6. Attend to precision. 7. Look for and make use of structure. 8. Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning. Specifically, the course Algebraic Literary I covers arithmetic number systems; linear equations, inequalities; exponent notation and radicals; polynomials, operations, and factoring; modeling; coordinate geometry; linear systems; and quadratic equations. Students will develop conceptual and procedural tools that support the use of key mathematical concepts in a variety of contexts. Textbook: You need to go to to sign up for your online homework system ALEKS. The ALEKS course code for this course is XXXXX-XXXXX. Once you sign up on ALEKS, you will have access to your online homework. In addition, you will have access to the following e-book: ALEKS 360 Beginning/Intermediate (4th edition). Authors: Miller, O’Neill, and Hyde
W May 18 FINAL EXAM. Composed of essay questions announced in advance. Exam will cover entire course. Deadline for turn in: 12:00 noon. Additional Holdings in Golda Meir Library Reference Works Baseball Encyclopedia [Macmillan], 7th ed. (1988) Dick Clark and Larry Lester, ed., The Negro Leagues Book (1994) Jonathan Fraser Light, The Cultural Encyclopedia of Baseball (1997) Official Encyclopedia of Baseball, 10th ed. (1979) James A. Riley, ed., Biographical Encyclopedia of the Negro Baseball Leagues (1994) General Works Charles C. Alexander, Our Game, An American Baseball History (1991) Robert F. Burk, Never Just a Game, Players, Owners, and American Baseball to 1920 (1994) Robert F. Burk, Much More Than a Game, Players, Owners, and American Baseball since 1920 (2001) Daniel Okrent and Harris Lewine, ed., The Ultimate Baseball Book (1988) Benjamin G. Rader, Baseball (1992) John P. Rossi, The National Game, Baseball and American Culture (2000) Harold Seymour, Baseball (1960- ) v. 1: The Early Years v. 2: The Golden Years v. 3: The People’s Game Robert Smith, Baseball (1970) Dean Sullivan, ed., Early Innings: A Documentary History of Baseball 1825-1908 (1995) Dean Sullivan, ed., Middle Innings: A Documentary History of Baseball 1900-1948 (1998) David Voigt, American Baseball: From Gentleman’s Sport to the Commissioner System (1966) Geoffrey C. Ward, Baseball: An Illustrated History (1994) Archival Resources The UWM Library Archives house several collections of papers and unpublished materials that deal in large part with the history of baseball in . These include the papers of Albert Rainovic (1948-1987), a longtime sports cartoonist for the Milwaukee Journal and Sentinel, and the records of the law firm Stafford, Rosenbaum, Risser, and Hanson relating to the 1966 court case State of Wisconsin v. Milwaukee Braves, which sought to prevent the transfer of the club to . The Forgotten Champs: The 1944 Chicks Oral
Public Utilities Commission of the State of California Alice Stebbins, Executive Director Headquarters 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 (415) 703-2782 Southern California Office 320 West 4th Street, Suite 500 Los Angeles, CA 90013 (213) 576-7000 Sacramento Office 300 Capitol Mall Sacramento CA 95814 (800) 848-5580 Website: Daily Calendar Tuesday, April 24, 2018 Commission Voting Meetings Commissioner All-Party Meetings Other Public Meetings Petitions for Modification Filings Suspensions Protests The Commission’s policy is to schedule hearings (meetings, workshops, etc.) in locations that are accessible to people with disabilities. The CPUC encourages all Californians to participate in its meetings, hearings, workshops, and proceedings. We try to hold our public meetings only in places that are wheelchair accessible and which can accommodate specialized equipment and other services useful to people with disabilities. Please see the notice of the meeting you wish to attend for more specifics. If you plan to attend and need specialized accommodations for a particular meeting that are not listed in the notice, request them from the Public Advisor’s Office at least three business days in advance of the meeting. Contact the Public Advisor’s Office by any one of the following: Email: toll-free: 1-866-849-8390 Voice: 415-703-2074 FAX: 415-355-5404 (Attn.: Public Advisor) TTY: 1-866-836-7825 (toll-free) 1-415-703-5282
10:00 a.m. ALJ Cooke Comr Peterman Marginal Costs, Allocate Revenues, and Design Rates, Commission Courtroom, San Francisco 07/09/18 10:00 a.m. ALJ Lirag Comr Picker A.17-10-007 (EH) - Application of San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U902M) for Authority, Among Other Things, to Update its Electric and Gas Revenue Requirement and Base Rates Effective on January 1, 2019, Commission Courtroom, San Francisco (Also July 10 – August 10 and August 28) 07/18/18 6:00 p.m. ALJ Houck Comr Picker I.12-10-013, And Related Matters (STC) - Order Instituting Investigation on the Commission’s Own Motion into the Rates, Operations, Practices, Services and Facilities of Southern California Edison Company and San Diego Gas and Electric Company Associated with the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 and 3, Sea Country Senior and Community Center – Grand Ballroom, 24602 Aliso Creek Rd., Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 OTHER PUBLIC MEETINGS Public Workshop Notice: Working Group on RA Program Reforms April 24, 2018 10am – 4pm Commission Headquarters – Courtyard Room San Francisco, CA 94102 WebEx information: Meeting number: 712 380 481 Meeting password: !Energy1 Participant call in: 1-866-811-4174 Participant passcode: 4390072# Public Meeting Notice: Small/Diverse Business Expo and Matchmaking Fair April 25, 2018 7:30 am – 1:30 pm The Grand Long Beach 4101 E. Willow Street Long Beach, CA 90815 For more information: Public Meeting Notice: California High Cost Fund B – Administrative Committee April 26, 2018 10:30 am – 12:00 pm Commission Headquarters – Room 3204 San Francisco, CA 94102
Name Title Organization Address City / State / Zip Telephone Email TRAINING FEES SAVE $200 if you enroll by June 1, 2015 YOU ARE A: For profit-professional Non-profit professional Freelance Professional Fee $2,600 $2,100 $1,600 YOUR GENERATION: Traditionalist Baby Boomer Gen X Millennial Check here if you would like to have cocktails/dinner on October 8 with other participants Cancellation Policy: If received by September 1, 2015 or earlier: full refund. September 1-17: 50% refund. After September 18, no refund, but payment can be applied to future training. FORM SUBMISSION DETAILS Please email completed form, short bio, and headshot to barbara@2164.net
Public Utilities Commission of the State of California Alice Stebbins, Executive Director Headquarters 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 (415) 703-2782 Southern California Office 320 West 4th Street, Suite 500 Los Angeles, CA 90013 (213) 576-7000 Sacramento Office 300 Capitol Mall Sacramento CA 95814 (800) 848-5580 Website: Daily Calendar Monday, June 18, 2018 Commission Voting Meetings Commissioner All-Party Meetings Other Public Meetings Petitions for Modification Submissions Filings Suspensions Protests The Commission’s policy is to schedule hearings (meetings, workshops, etc.) in locations that are accessible to people with disabilities. The CPUC encourages all Californians to participate in its meetings, hearings, workshops, and proceedings. We try to hold our public meetings only in places that are wheelchair accessible and which can accommodate specialized equipment and other services useful to people with disabilities. Please see the notice of the meeting you wish to attend for more specifics. If you plan to attend and need specialized accommodations for a particular meeting that are not listed in the notice, request them from the Public Advisor’s Office at least three business days in advance of the meeting. Contact the Public Advisor’s Office by any one of the following: Email: toll-free: 1-866-849-8390 Voice: 415-703-2074 FAX: 415-355-5404 (Attn.: Public Advisor) TTY: 1-866-836-7825 (toll-free) 1-415-703-5282 COMMISSION VOTING MEETINGS
AB 217 augmented the original funding and extended the program through 2021. In addition, this legislation adopted additional program requirements for both MASH and SASH. Specifically, the legislation directed that the Commission must ensure that the SASH program does the following: Maximizes the overall benefit to ratepayers from the programs; Requires participants who receive incentives to enroll in the Energy Savings Assistance Program if eligible; and Provides job training and employment opportunities in the solar energy and energy efficiency sectors of the economy. D.15-01-027 updated MASH and SASH program requirements consistent with AB 217. This decision added $54 million to the SASH budget, and reduced incentive levels under the SASH program by half, from $6.00/watt to $3.00/watt. The current SASH program couples the program’s incentive dollars ($7 million to $9 million each year) with GRID Alternatives’ contributions (~$4M-$5M/year) from philanthropic fundraising, proceeds from the third-party ownership (TPO) model, equipment donations, and other resources to result in roughly 1,000 annual projects without relying on a financial contribution or ongoing financial obligation from the participating households. Based on a consensus of the parties reflected in the record of the rulemaking, D.15-01-027 directed SCE to renew its contract with GRID Alternatives for continued administration of the SASH program through 2021, the end of the AB 217 program extension. The SASH program is currently funded through 2021, or until funding is exhausted. In addition, D.15-01-027 requires SASH and MASH installers to provide job training and employment opportunities.
if Line 1600 is removed from service, then total system capacity is 570 MMcfd from Line 3010 alone.) SDG&E/SoCalGas Long-Term Peak Demand Forecast 1in10 Cold Day Demand (MMcfd) (Exh. SDGE12 at 84 and 159.) Operating Year Core Noncore EG Total 201617 366 60 152 578 201718 374 61 153 588 201819 374 61 154 589 201920 374 62 154 589 202021 374 62 154 590 202122 373 62 146 581 202223 372 62 138 572 2023-24 371 62 130 563 202425 370 62 123 556 202526 370 62 116 548 203031 374 62 103 539 203536 381 61 103 546 But Applicants argue, “[w]ithout Line 1600 in transmission service, SDG&E’s gas system would not meet the 1in10 cold day design criteria until 2023, based on SDG&E’s current forecast.” (SDG&E/SoCalGas Opening Brief at 12.) “If the Commission approves the project, then it will take about 3.5 years to build Line 3602, which then would allow the Utilities to take Line 1600 out of transmission service without violating the Commission’s design criteria.” (SDG&/SoCalGas Opening Brief at 12.) UCAN supports the Applicants’ Line 3602 proposal and indicates that it deserves support. UCAN explains that it arrived at this conclusion “in light of
Approving contracts that result from an RFO or an open season process via an expedited Advice Letter process. The System Operator regularly uses its ability to buy and sell spot gas to maintain minimum flows in the San Diego area. As required by D.0911006 and SoCalGas Rule 41, SoCalGas is required to provide an Annual Compliance Report summarizing all the purchases and sales of gas made by the System Operator to maintain the Southern System minimum flow requirements. Section 17 of Rule 41 permits the Gas Control Department of the System Operator to make spot purchases at Otay Mesa or move supplies from Blythe to Otay Mesa when it is necessary to meet minimum flow requirements. In addition, a new tool was recently added as a temporary addition to Rule 41 (Section 29) permitting SoCalGas to enter into summertime baseload contracts. Parties’ Positions Applicants observe that only ORA supports the concept of an “open season.” Applicants argue that the “open season” concept is not applicable to the Proposed Project, which is a safety and reliability project. (SDG&E/SoCalGas Opening Brief at 52.) D.0211073 also indicates that open seasons are a vehicle to allocate firm noncore capacity between existing customers, new customers, incremental new load of customers and new customers. But Applicants argue that “[s]uch situations, however, do not exist here...[i]n stark contrast, the PSRP is proposed to enhance the safety and reliability of SDG&E’s existing gas system.” (SDG&E/SoCalGas Opening Brief at 52.) In D.0609039, the Commission stated that utilities may not rely on results of open season bidding in designing their local transmission system, but rather they must ensure that it remains reliable. Applicants argue that ORA suggested
APPENDIX D List of California Publicly-Owned Utilities Alameda Municipal Power Anaheim, City of Azusa Light and Water Banning, City of Biggs Municipal Utilities Burbank Water and Power Cerritos, City of City and County of San Francisco Colton Public Utilities Corona, City of Eastside Power Authority Glendale Water and Power Gridley Electric Utility Healdsburg, City of Imperial Irrigation District Industry, City of Kirkwood Meadows Public Utility District Lassen Municipal Utility District Lodi Electric Utility Lompoc, City of Los Angeles Department of Water & Power Merced Irrigation District Modesto Irrigation District Moreno Valley Electric Utility Needles, City of Palo Alto, City of Pasadena Water and Power Pittsburg, City of (doing business as Island Energy) Port of Oakland Port of Stockton Power and Water Resources Pooling Authority Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Redding Electric Utility Riverside, City of Roseville Electric Sacramento Municipal Utility District
materials under seal. Netly, LLC represents that the information is sensitive, and disclosure could substantial harm its ability to compete, as well as its ability to negotiate contracts with vendors and customers. We have granted similar requests in the past and do so here. Categorization and Need for Hearings In Resolution ALJ 1763412 dated February 8, 2018, the Commission preliminarily categorized this application as ratesetting, and preliminarily determined that hearings were necessary. No protests have been received. Since no protests were filed and we required no further information from Netly, LLC, it was determined that hearings were not necessary. This change to the preliminary determination was made in the Scoping Memo, issued on October 13, 2017, and is affirmed herein. Waiver of Comments This is an uncontested matter in which the decision grants the relief requested. Accordingly, pursuant to § 311(g)(2) of the Public Utilities Code and Rule 14.6(c)(2), the otherwise applicable 30day period for public review and comment is waived. Assignment of Proceeding Clifford Rechtschaffen is the assigned Commissioner and Dan Burcham is the assigned ALJ in this proceeding. Findings of Fact Netly, LLC is a telephone corporation and a public utility as defined in Pub. Util. Code § 234(a) and § 216(a). Netly, LLC’s proposed construction activities appear to fall within one or more CEQA categorical exemptions.
ATTACHMENT C ANNUAL REPORT An original and a machine readable, copy using Microsoft Word or compatible format must be submitted to the California Public Utilities Commission, State Office Building, 505 Van Ness Avenue, Room 3107, San Francisco, CA 941023298, no later than March 31st of the year following the calendar year for which the annual report is submitted. Failure to submit this information on time may result in a penalty as provided for in Pub. Util. Code §§ 2107 and 2108. Required information: Exact legal name and U # of the reporting utility. Address. Name, title, address, and telephone number of the person to be contacted concerning the reported information. Name and title of the officer having custody of the general books of account and the address of the office where such books are kept. Type of organization (e.g., corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship, etc.). If incorporated, specify: a. Date of filing articles of incorporation with the Secretary of State. b. State in which incorporated. Number and date of the Commission decision granting the Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. Date operations were begun. Description of other business activities in which the utility is engaged. List of all affiliated companies and their relationship to the utility. State if affiliate is a: a. Regulated public utility. b. Publicly held corporation.
Public Utilities Commission of the State of California Alice Stebbins, Executive Director Headquarters 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 (415) 703-2782 Southern California Office 320 West 4th Street, Suite 500 Los Angeles, CA 90013 (213) 576-7000 Sacramento Office 300 Capitol Mall Sacramento CA 95814 (800) 848-5580 Website: Daily Calendar Thursday, June 21, 2018 Commission Voting Meetings Commissioner All-Party Meetings Other Public Meetings Petitions for Modification Submissions Filings Suspensions Protests The Commission’s policy is to schedule hearings (meetings, workshops, etc.) in locations that are accessible to people with disabilities. The CPUC encourages all Californians to participate in its meetings, hearings, workshops, and proceedings. We try to hold our public meetings only in places that are wheelchair accessible and which can accommodate specialized equipment and other services useful to people with disabilities. Please see the notice of the meeting you wish to attend for more specifics. If you plan to attend and need specialized accommodations for a particular meeting that are not listed in the notice, request them from the Public Advisor’s Office at least three business days in advance of the meeting. Contact the Public Advisor’s Office by any one of the following: Email: toll-free: 1-866-849-8390 Voice: 415-703-2074 FAX: 415-355-5404 (Attn.: Public Advisor) TTY: 1-866-836-7825 (toll-free) 1-415-703-5282 COMMISSION VOTING MEETINGS
Failure to submit the following specified filings, notices, reports and other items as directed in Commission Resolutions, Decisions, Orders, and the Public Utilities Code : Financial Reports (Annual and Affiliate Transaction Reports Pursuant G.O. 104-A and D.93-02-019) Initial Tariff Filings following issuance of a CPCN or other registration Annual Tariff Filings Performance Bonds (Includes both Initial and Annual Performance Bond Advice Letter filings and Advice Letter filings of updated or newly issued performance bonds) Service Quality Reports as ordered in G.O 133-D Advice Letters required to implement company name change, Transfer of Control, withdrawal of operating authority, or tariff changes Regulatory Contact Information changes License Acceptance Notification Service Commencement Notification $1,000 for the first event. Each subsequent notice increases the penalty amount by an additional $200. Failure to report and remit surcharge payments for at least six months as directed in Commission Resolutions, Decisions, Orders, and the Public Utilities Code $1,000 per event up to a maximum $3,000. Failure to report and remit user fee payments for at least 30 days as directed in Commission Resolutions, Decisions, Orders, and the Public Utilities Code Subject to Public Utilities Code Section 405. The Commission may assess a penalty not to exceed 25% of user fees due on delinquent payments.
Definitions (CforAT Reply Brief), filed on January 11, 2016 at pp. 7-9. CforAT argued that any analysis of bill impacts should consider monthly bills in order to adequately assess the impact of bill volatility. CforAT Reply Brief at p. 10. CforAT argued that the reference to “unreasonable hardship” under §745(c)(2) and “hardship” under §745(d) have different meanings, and must include issues of health and safety as well as financial hardship. CforAT Opening Brief at p. 10. CforAT sought additional guidance on excluded customers under §745(c)(1). CforAT Comments on PD at pp. 8-9. TOU: D.17-09-036 (Section 745 Decision 2): CforAT argued that the burden of proof on whether customers experience hardship is on the proponents of TOU rates, and that default TOU proposals cannot be adopted unless the proponents affirmatively demonstrate that they will not cause hardship as required by statute. CforAT Opening Brief on § 745 Issues, filed on June 15, 2017, at pp. 12-14, CforAT Reply Brief on § 745 Issues, filed on June 29, 2017 at p. 2. This assignment of the burden of proof is foundational to all other arguments. CforAT argued that While the Commission does not make a direct statement regarding burden of proof, it applies the standard proffered by CforAT throughout the Section 745 Decision 2. See e.g. Section 745 Decision 2 at p. 17 (“We find that the available evidence is insufficient to conclude that economically vulnerable customers in hot climate zones do not experience unreasonable economic hardship due to TOU rates”), see also id.at pp. 19, 22. The Commission agreed with CforAT and other parties that bill impacts for CARE/FERA customers in hot climate zones are quite high. Section 745 Decision 2 at p. 16. The Commission thus ordered these customers to be excluded from the upcoming default TOU pilots based on risk of unreasonable economic Verified
The Claim, with any adjustment set forth above, satisfies all requirements of Pub. Util. Code §§ 1801-1812. ORDER Center for Accessible Technology shall be awarded $293,958.48. Within 30 days of the effective date of this decision, Pacific Gas and Electric Company ratepayers, Southern California Edison ratepayers, and San Diego Gas & Electric Company ratepayers shall pay Center for Accessible Technology their respective shares of the award, based on their California-jurisdictional electric revenues for the 2017 calendar year, to reflect the year in which the proceeding was primarily litigated. Payment of the award shall include compound interest at the rate earned on prime, three-month non-financial commercial paper as reported in Federal Reserve Statistical Release H.15, beginning May 7, 2018, the 75th day after the filing of Center for Accessible Technology’s request, and continuing until full payment is made. The comment period for today’s decision is waived. This decision is effective today. Dated June 21, 2018, at San Francisco, California. MICHAEL PICKER President CARLA J. PETERMAN LIANE M. RANDOLPH MARTHA GUZMAN ACEVES CLIFFORD RECHTSCHAFFEN Commissioners
beneficial areas.” Decision at 54. “EDF opposed the portfolio recommendation because it does not contain enough DERs or accurately reflect their value to the system.” Decision at 67. 6. EDF expressed in comments that the total resource cost (TRC) test did not present an adequate representation of costs and benefits. “Numerous parties commented on the manner in which resource costs are treated in RESOLVE. Staff used a total resource cost metric, which was favored by PG&E, SDG&E, NRG, ORA, and LSA. SEIA, POC, and EDF do not believe that the TRC approach is appropriate for BTM PV and/or storage.” Decision at 39. Verified 7. EDF expressed in comments that reliance on curtailment was costly and unnecessary, given the potential of DERs to match demand in a more efficient way. “EDF would prefer that the Commission emphasize development of DERs that match demand, rather than relying on curtailment strategies.” Decision at 40. Verified 8. EDF stated in comments that the 30 million metric ton (MMT) GHG target was imminently achievable and urged the Commission to be more ambitious. “EDF is concerned that the benefits of DERs are not fully reflected in the analysis and thus the Commission should be more aggressive than 42 MMT.” Decision at 47. Verified 9. EDF stated in comments that consideration of the impacts (positive or negative) on disadvantaged communities should be a more robust consideration in the staff proposal. “Numerous other parties disagreed with the recommendations by staff, including AReM, CalCCA, EDF, Imperial County, National Grid, NRG, PG&E, SDG&E, and SoCalGas… EDF objected to the staff recommendations because they do not go far enough to address the fact that disadvantaged communities suffer disproportionately from the impacts of poor air quality.” Decision at 53. Verified 10. EDF urged the Commission to consider the “EDF’s comments focused on the possibility of a regional market in Verified
PERSON SPECIFICATION The expertise required for a person to be fully competent in the role. Position specific competencies: ESSENTIAL DESIRABLE Education and Qualifications (or equivalent level of learning) Relevant qualification in a trade, project management or construction management is required or minimum of two years’ experience in project / facilities coordination. Relevant experience in hospital, project and/or facilities environment is desirable. Evidence of health and safety competency training (i.e. Site Safe). Experience Minimum two years’ experience in project / facilities coordination. Experience in project management processes and best practice. Experience dealing with legislation and contracts. Experiencing in coordinating capital projects in healthcare facilities and/or other facilities which must continue operation during the project. Experience in writing / input into business cases. Experience in participating in tender evaluation and post tender evaluation. Knowledge and Skills Knowledge of project / facilities coordination processes, relevant standards and legislation. Knowledge of hospital infrastructure. Knowledge of government procurement processes. Competency in Microsoft Office suite including Project. Personal Qualities Strong ability to communicate and work effectively with people at all levels. High level of motivation, initiative and anticipation with the ability to work independently as well as part of a team. Good negotiator and able to think outside of the square to arrive at solutions that suit all stakeholders. Monitors, measures and continually improves own performance, establishes and maintains effective relationships. Evaluates situations and identifies existing problems or opportunities as well as actively seeking solutions to problems before being asked or directed. Demonstrated competence in performing and delivering under tight financial constraints and within strict timeframes. Experience managing budgets to ensure that services provided are the best value within operational financial constraints. Able to demonstrate leadership, but also be an effective member of a team. Coordination, negotiation, planning and organisational skills. Performs tasks reliably. Positive attitude with a good sense of humour. Must hold a current driver’s licence.
Week 1 (September 7) Introductions A1. Points of Departure: The International System and the Cold War. Readings: **Joshua Goldstein, International Relations, 6th ed., 171-207 (“International Conflict”) A2. The Nation-State and International Law Readings: **Joshua Goldstein, International Relations, 6th ed., 255-295 (“International Organization and Law”). N.B. Readings marked with a double asterisk are available on the D2L website for the course. Week 2 (September 14) A3. The Multinational Corporation. Readings: Joel Bakan, The Corporation, 1-84. Week 3 (September 21) – No Meeting in Class this Week! Library Research 1: Preparation of Research Project Bibliography Week 4 (September 28) B. Military Security Readings: **John Steinbruner, Principles of Global Security, 1-22; **Jamal Nassar, Globalization and Terrorism, 1-40; and **Frederic Gareau, State Terrorism and the United States, 11-42. Week 5 (October 5) Military Security, cont. – Drones Readings: **Scott Shane, Objective Troy, 66-81; **Richard Falk, “Why Drones are More Dangerous…”; and EITHER **Amnesty International, “Will I Be Next?”; OR: **Human Rights Watch, “Between a Drone and Al-Qaeda.” Week 6 (October 12) C. Economic Security. Readings: Joel Bakan, The Corporation, 85-167; and **Jagdish Bhagwati, In Defense of Globalization, 162-195 Week 7 (October 19) – No Meeting in Class this Week! Library Research 2: Assembling Materials for Research Project Week 8 (October 26) Economic Security, cont. Readings: **Amy Chua, World on Fire, 19-48, 127-145; **Lanchester on Robots; and **Lowe, International Law (“The Global Economy”), 188-233 Week 9 (November 2) – No Meeting in Class this Week!
4.5. Issue 5 (Consideration of SED Analysis and Recommendations) In addition to the Application, the Commission considers the SED Response and Joint Statement which reflects SED’s analyses and recommendations regarding the Proposed Pathway. With regard to the Application, SED contends as follows: a. On March 30, 2017, SED staff visited the site (two locations within the Qualcomm Stadium parking lot) and participated in diagnostic team reviews with SANDAG, the MTS, and City of San Diego personnel. b. During its diagnostic review, SED staff evaluated the proposed crossings for safety issues with respect to clearances. The industry standard for clearances is a minimum eight-foot vertical clearance, which has consistently been accepted by the Commission and is used in SED’s internal guidelines. c. SED concluded that the Proposed Pathway’s minimum vertical clearances will be no less than eight feet, with vertical clearances in most areas under the track structure exceeding this minimum height. As such, SED was satisfied that the proposed clearances are set at a safe height for bicyclists and pedestrians. d. Through direct inspection, SED staff did not find any safety issues, or other issues of concern, at the location of the proposed crossings. e. SED concluded that, because the Proposed Pathway is to construct grade-separated crossings, additional safety review is neither required by the Commission nor needed to evaluate the safety of the Proposed Pathway. f. SED believes that the proposed rail crossings are and as such, will provide safe access points for pedestrians/bicyclists to cross the light-rail tracks without coming into contact with train vehicles.
・Master level: □1st year □2nd year □Other Your Major Field(s) of Study Nationality Date of Birth (Month/Day/Year) Gender □ Male □ Female English Language Proficiency List your TOEFL, TOEIC or IELTS score □ TOEFL ( ） □ TOEIC ( ） □ IELTS ( ） □ Other ( ） Educational Background Name of Institution Period of Enrollment (e.g. Mar 2010 – Feb 2014) Education Level (e.g., Undergraduate/ Master) Contact Information □ E-mail: □ Phone Number: □ Postal Address: Statement of Purpose Describe briefly your reason or motivation for attending this workshop (single-spaced, about 300-500 words in length).
27 Lonely Msiske Kasungu District Hospital Schools Coordinator F 28 Lonely Msiske, Kasungu District Hospital Community Health Nurse, F 29 Noah J.H.C. Chirwa, Kasungu TTC Head of Dept Foundation, M 32 Louden Chimangeni, Kasungu TTC TTC Principal, M 33 Excellent Zimba Kaunama School Headteacher M 34 Mcstanly Chalema Msenzaumoza Primary Headteacher M 35 Stanley Chalema Msezaumozi Headteacher M 36 Donald M.K. Banda Nkhamenya Boys Primary Headteacher M 37 Alice M. Nyirongo Nkhamenya Girls Primary Headteacher F 38 Miriam S. Chisi Nkhamenya TDC Primary Education Advisor F 39 Ntchawaka Kaunda Nkhamenya TDC Assistant Coordinator M 40 John Manda Nkhotakota DEM's Office DEMISO M 41 Halima Twaha Nkhotakota DEM's Office ZEMISO F 42 Isaac Banda Nkhotakota District Hospital District Hospital Officer M 43 Banenenge Silwimba Nthembwe Primary School Headteacher M 44 Richard Kumwenda Participatory Development Initiatives (PDI) Project Manager M 45 Wilson C. Chirwa Simlemba Headteacher M 46 Samson Gideon Kalinda Simlemba CDSS Deputy head teacher M 47 Tonny Phiri Simlemba TDC Primary Education Advisor M 48 Ephraim Mbewa Water Department District Water Dev Officer M 49 Icilly Mede Nkhotakota District Hospital District Nursing Officer F 50 Peter Mpungalume Nkhotakota District Hospital Schools Health and Nutrition Coordinator M
Annex 4: Work schedule for baseline fieldwork Date District/ Site Activity Size FGDs Size KII No. Sunday 23 October 2016 Kasungu Meeting with CCAP Management and project staff - - - CCAP Management and staff 1 Research team training and orientation - - - Monday 24 October 2016 Kasungu Pretesting of study tools 30 - - - Review, finalise tools and print Tuesday 25 October 2016 Kasungu Individual survey with: 25 SNE learners 25 Non-SNE learners 25 parents/guardians 25 community members 25 teachers (20 pri + 5 sec) 5 head teachers 125 SNE learners Teachers 10 10 10 At least six key informants at zonal or district level. 8 26 October 2016 Kasungu Individual survey with: 25 SNE learners 25 Non-SNE learners 25 parents/guardians 25 community members 25 teachers (20 pri + 5 sec) 5 head teachers 125 Community ldrs Non-SNE learners TTC students 10 10 10 At least six key informants at zonal or district level. 8 27 October 2016 Individual survey with: 25 SNE learners 25 Non-SNE learners 25 parents/guardians 25 community members 25 teachers (20 pri + 5 sec) 5 head teachers 125 SNE learners Teachers 10 10 10 At least six key informants at zonal or district level. Friday 28 October 2016 Individual survey with: 25 SNE learners 25 Non-SNE learners 25 parents/guardians 25 community members 25 teachers (20 pri + 5 sec) 5 head teachers 125 Community ldrs Non-SNE learners 10 10 10 At least six key informants at zonal or district level. 8 Sat. 29 Oct 2016 Data entry and analysis and Team debrief - - - - -
Transporting Pesticides Pesticides and Firefighting Biological Warfare Agents Select Agents Dissemination of Infectious Pathogens and Toxins Responding to Incidents involving a Release of Infectious Pathogens and Toxins Transporting Infectious Substances Anthrax Ricin Unit Eleven: Chemistry of Some Oxidizers. Unit Objective: Upon successful completion of this unit, the student will be able to: Associate the physical and health hazards of the oxidizers noted in this chapter with the information provided by their hazard diamonds and GHS pictograms. Describe how NFPA distinguishes the degree of hazard potentially posed by different oxidizers. Identify the primary industries that use the oxidizers noted in this chapter. Identify commercial products that contain oxidizers. Describe the OSHA and DHS regulations that pertain to the handling, storage, stowing, loading, unloading, or discharge of bulk quantities of ammonium nitrate. Identify the labels, markings, and placards that DOT requires on the packaging of oxidizers and the transport vehicles used for their shipment. Identify the response actions to be executed when oxidizers are released from their packaging into the environment. Learning Activities: Classroom lecture/discussion Student homework study Text assignment: Chapter 11, Chemistry of Some Oxidizers, pp. Unit Outline: What is an Oxidizer? DOT Classification of Oxidizers OSHA/GHS Identification of Oxidizers b Oxidation Numbers Oxidation-Reduction Reactions Common Features of Oxidizers Hydrogen Peroxide The KURSK Workplace Regulations involving Hydrogen Peroxide Transporting Hydrogen Peroxide Responding to Incidents involving a Release of Hydrogen Peroxide Nonchlorine Bleaches Metallic Hypochlorites Sodium Hypochlorite
Dells Waterpark Classic– February 16- 18, 2018 PW Red & White Division Tournament Format There are 2 Divisions, Red and White. Each team plays 3 preliminary round games. At that conclusion, 1st and 2nd place teams in the Red Division will play for the Red Championship and 1st and 2nd place teams in the White Division will play for the White Championship. The 3rd place teams in the each Division will play in a consolation game. Standings Team Points Gm1 Points Gm2 Points Gm3 Total Points Tiebreakers Red Div.- Kirkwood Stars, MO. 0 0 2 2 Red Div.- Lakeland Hawks, WI. 2 2 2 6 Red Div.- Riverdogs 4 Hockey (gilner), IL. 2 2 0 4 White Div- Quad City Ice Eagles, IA. 0 2 2 4 White Div- Riverdogs 1 (lynch), IL. 0 0 0 0 White Div- Waukesha Warhawks, WI. 2 0 0 2 Game Results Fri 8:05 Pm Dells Poppy Rink Kirkwood 4 vs. Lakeland 7 Fri 8:30 Pm Reedsburg Arena Quad City 1 vs. Riverdogs 4 3 Fri 8:30 Pm Sauk Prairie Rink Waukesha 7 vs. Riverdogs 1 3 Sat 8:30 Am Dells Poppy Rink Lakeland 7 vs. Waukesha 1 Sat 9:40 Am Dells Poppy Rink Riverdogs 1 0 vs. Quad City 4 Sat 9:15 Am Sauk Prairie Rink Riverdogs 4 4 vs. Kirkwood 0 Sat 4:50 Pm Dells Poppy Rink Kirkwood 5 vs. Riverdogs 1 2 Sat 6:30 Pm Reedsburg Arena Quad City 6 vs. Waukesha 2 Sun 7:40 Am Dells Poppy Rink Lakeland 6 vs. Riverdogs 4 3 *** HOME *** *** AWAY *** Sun 12:00 Pm Sauk Prairie Rink 3rd Place- Red Div Kirkwood 2-0 3rd Place – White Div Riverdogs (lynch) Consolation Sun 10:00 Am Dells Poppy Rink 1st Place- White Div Quad City 3-2 SO 2nd place- White Div Waukesha White Championship Sun 12:30 Pm Dells Poppy Rink 1st Place- Red Div Lakeland 2nd place- Red Div Riverdogs (gilner) Red Championship