evaluation and report (Natl. Intl.) of project implementation Project completion report Natl. Project Coordinator Chief Technical Advisor None foreseen (imbedded in project team time) Three months prior to end of project implementation and before project final evaluation Financial audits Natl. Project Coordinator UNEP Funds Manager USD 32,259 To be defined Yearly Annual project oversight and review missions (incl. possibly field visits) UNEP Covered by IA fee Yearly Field monitoring missions by project management unit Natl. Project Coordinator Project management unit Chief Technical Advisor USD 15,647 To be defined When required Project national steering committee meetings UNEP Task Manager Chief Technical Advisor Natl. Project Coordinator USD 10,116 To be defined By-annually; with once annually for formal functions such as approval budgets and workplans Monitoring and evaluation consultants (Intl. and Natl.) Natl. M&E specialist Chief Technical Advisor Natl. Project Coordinator Natl. M&E cons. USD 13,529 To be defined As indicated in project work plan, including the inception report phase for baseline gaps, methodology setups and training as needed Indicative cost total:) Estimated cost: USD 177,188 PART iII: Approval/endorsement by gef operational focal point(s) and gef agency(ies) Record of Endorsement of GEF Operational Focal Point(s) on Behalf of the Government(s): ): (Please attach the with this form. For SGP, use this . Name Position Ministry Date (MM/dd/yyyy) Dr. Lonh HEAL Technical Director General Ministry of Environment, Cambodia 09/05/2011
B. GEF agency(ies) certification This request has been prepared in accordance with GEF/LDCF/SCCF/NPIF policies and procedures and meets the GEF/LDCF/SCCF/NPIF criteria for CEO endorsement/approval of project. Agency Coordinator, Agency Name Signature Date (Month, day, year) Project Contact Person Telephone Email Address Brennan Van Dyke, UNEP GEF Coordinator, UNEP RoA May 15, 2015 Max Zieren Task Manager max.zieren@unep.org GEF_CEOENDR_52
not the project's intention, then is the project's aim to apply indicators that will be defined at a higher level? If so, relying on another process to deliver these is a risk. it is a MoE project it will use and adapt existing national policies and strategies (NBSAP) as well as national targets and indicators linked to Aichi. Through the biodiversity vision and strategic national management plan for protected areas the project will help to coordinate monitoring of indicators and targets. 11. STAP recommends indicating the numbers of professional staff involved in each project component. This information would facilitate understanding the relative priority of each aspect, and the likelihood that stated aims can be achieved. The recommendation has been taken in consideration. The project document and budgets indicate the need for technical and operational human resources in each component/outcome. With high levels of there is a significant logistical and coordination role, so the relative priority is more clearly seen when considering the overall co-finance budget Appendix 14B. Procurement plan for consultancy services 12. STAP recommends revisiting the project framework so that the outputs are stated as products rather than restating the outcomes, or expressing as activity targets Through stakeholder discussion the project framework has been significantly revised to build in practicality. In summary the ProDoc has two Component/Outcomes replacing the seven PIF outcomes, which became more practical outputs. Annex 4 and 5 and point 3.2,.3.3 13. It would be helpful to define the abbreviations at first use. This has been done, and a list of abbreviation has been added on page 6. Page 6 on the project document Annex C: status of implementation of project preparation activities and the use of funds A. provide detailed amount of the ppg activities financing status in the table below: PPG Grant Approved at PIF: USD 100,000 Project Preparation Activities Implemented GEF/LDCF/SCCF/NPIF Amount ($) Budgeted Amount Amount Spent to date Amount Committed Consultants 70,000 42,134 27,866 Meetings & workshop 19,500 13,166 6,334 Travel and other 10,500 7,150 3,350 Total 100,000 62,450 37,550 annex D: calendar of expected reflows (if non-grant instrument is used) Provide a calendar of expected reflows to the GEF/LDCF/SCCF/NPIF Trust Fund or to your Agency (and/or revolving fund that will be set up)