EE – Energy Efficiency EurAsEC – EurAsian Economic Community HBB – HCH – (lindane) HCW – Healthcare Waste HCWM – Healthcare Waste Management IBRD – International Bank for Reconstruction and Development IDB – Islamic Development Bank IHCW – Infectious Healthcare Waste IMF – The International Monetary Fund INC – Intergovernmental Negotiation Committee MEAs – Multilateral Environmental Agreements MEP – Ministry of Environmental Protection MINT – Ministry of Industry and New Technologies MoA – Ministry of Agriculture MPH – Ministry of Public Health MSW – Municipal Solid Waste MTE and FTE – Mid-term and final evaluations NIP – National Implementation Plan for the Stockholm Convention NGO – Non Governmental Organization PCDD/Fs – Dioxins and furans PFOs – Perfluorooctane Sulphonate PIC – Prior Informed Consent PIF – Project Identification Framework PIU – Project Implementation Unit PCB – Polychlorinated byphenils POPs – Persistent Organic Pollutants PPE – Personal protective equipment RCU – Regional Coordinating Unit RECETOX – Research Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment RK – Republic of Kazakhstan SAICM – Strategic Approach for International Chemicals Management SC – Stockholm Convention SDS – Safety Data Sheets SESC – Sanitary and Epidemiological Surveillance Committee SCO – The Shanghai Cooperation Organization
Cloth; carded and combed [thousand square metres] 43,325 286,731 244,976 99,319 64,147 Leather of cows or horse family hairless [thousand square decimetres] 202,728 286,731 244,976 99,319 64,147 Leather of sheeps, goats, pigs hairless [thousand square decimetres] 295 754 249 423 114 Protective and orthopaedic footwear, except sports shoes [thousand of pairs] 1,107 1,213 719 1,153 1,388 Shoes with upper layer made of leather with specially protected soles and specialized shoes (except sports shoes) [thousand of pairs] 508 531 622 630 786 Production of diagnostic medical devices 1 253 355 105 142 168 210 Production of paper [tonnes] 115 49,059 79,854 77,049 22,480 1,800 Production of packaging [million tonnes] 60 57 63 62 Due to varying measurements applied by the Statistics Agency to the production output for industrial the above can be used to consider relative importance of those areas where potential use of new POPs can be detected during future surveys. Pesticide production is present, though it has quite a limited share with only 20 small industries operational, most of which are likely formulators rather than producers of pesticides. Other sub-sectors (fabric, leather, paper, packaging, wool processing and manufacturing) are considered as potential users of new POPs (for instance, PFO-S) and their respective production outputs may be considered as a rough indicator of the potential use of POPs chemicals by these industries. With regard to the chemical industry in Kazakhstan, its share in the total industrial output during constituted 1.1%, while the total manufacturing output was in the order of 3.8% on average. A number of industrial enterprises, which by type of their operations can be classified as a part of the chemical industry, has remained stable over same period, with some decrease after 2008 (from 223 to 206). In monetary terms, the value of the chemical industry for the first half of 2012 amounted to 89,658 sectors,
Aktobe 16 0 40-60 kg/h 6 Almaty (region) 3 0 360-3,000 kg/day 1 Atyrau 8 26 No data 1 East Kazakhstan 4 307 20-200 kg/h 0 Karaganda 5 0 No data 0 Kostanai 4 1 10-100 kg/h 1 Kyzylorda 10 348 50-150 kg/h 0 Mangistau 4 34 100-150 kg/h 1 North Kazakhstan 4 0 40 kg/h, 3 tonnes in one cycle 0 Pavlodar 9 0 10-100 kg/h 0 South Kazakhstan 2 0 180-1,000 kg/h 0 West Kazakhstan 5 5 12-100 kg/h 1 Zhambyl 4 362 10-50 kg/h 0 Astana (city) 3 1 50-700 kg/h 0 Almaty (city) 3 1 50 kg/h, 3 tonnes/day 0 The legal framework in Kazakhstan does not establish a national emission standard for waste incineration nor sets any other specific technical conditions for the incineration process. However, like any other kind of waste treatment installation, an incinerator is a subject of environmental impact assessment and has to obtain a permit for waste disposal before equipment commissioning. The permit sets down emission requirements for certain pollutants for which environmental fee is obligatory, but those requirements do not include uPOPs and heavy metals. Test burns are not completed, but instead their releases are calculated theoretically during facility permitting process, which then should be self-monitored and by installation owners. Hence, in practical terms, the emission control and monitoring during waste incineration is not carried out at all. The environmental situation is significantly worsened due to the commonly practiced chlorination (disinfection) of infectious healthcare waste before incineration which leads to even more elevated PCDD/Fs emissions during waste burning and/or chlorine substances released at landfills as well. Additional environmental problem is caused by resulting formal classification of the incineration residues as municipal waste and their subsequent disposal in landfills not specifically engineered for that purpose. Because the exact information on quantity of waste burnt by each installation is not available, an estimation presented in Table 7 was prepared to determine potential releases of PCDD/Fs from healthcare waste incineration in Kazakhstan. For both types of incinerators, the regionally available quantity of waste was taken into account, and minimal quantities of waste and operation time were used in assumptions.
and other globally harmful pollutants into the environment by promoting sound healthcare waste management in Kazakhstan, and to assist the country in implementing its relevant obligations under the Stockholm convention. prepared and coordination on chemical MEAs is enhanced. Several POPs initiatives are implemented not in a coordinated way recommendations for improvement are prepared Initial inter-agency cooperation Updated draft NIP is presented to the Government for review process and endorsement and draft regulations MTE and FTE reports Published official documentation (law, state programs, etc.). properly coordinated effort and in a weak NIP update. Difficulties in gathering information due to the lack of commitment, actual data or resources. Difficulties in reaching the agreement on NIP content and objectives. Mercury inventory and Reduction plan prepared. Stand-alone, site specific mercury contamination remediation programme is in place by the World Bank No other inventories of mercury initiated and completed and human exposure estimated No mercury use and release standard set No national mercury management plan formulated and approved Data collection teams established and operational Sources of mercury, storages and contaminated sites identified. Legislative gaps analyzed and recommendations drafted UNDP and UNEP separate initiatives progressively advance with their objectives Mercury situation in Kazakhstan assessed Inventory is documented Inter-agency consultations held National capacity to handle recovered mercury is assessed and recommendations for improvement are set forward Draft National Mercury Reduction Plan developed with identified priorities. Mercury emission standard established. Inventory collection reports Legislative options reports and draft regulations MTE and FTE reports Published official documentation (law, state programs, etc.). Data limitations constrain priority discussions Draft Plan is delayed in review and acceptance that results in weak enforcement POPs emissions from healthcare waste incineration are reduced through a demonstration component, and wider replication of Waste segregation for waste source reduction is not a standard accepted approach in medical facilities Routine waste 86.08 g TEQ/a to air, and 0.46 g TEQ/a to bottom ash. 16.38 g TEQ/a to air, and 0.11 g TEQ/a to bottom ash Number of incinerators replaced by alternative systems, and shut down. Quantity of The emission standard for waste incineration is not implemented or delayed in approval.
results. incineration without emission controls and risk reduction measures is commonly practiced Low level of practical knowledge and use of non-combustion techniques Baseline emissions constitute 124.88 g TEQ/a to air, and 0.65 g TEQ/a to bottom ash. waste treated in and incineration installations. Statistical data from RoK MEP, and RoK MPH. Installations that do not comply with the emission standard are not removed from operation. All incinerators not compliant with technical and emission standards removed from services. Mercury waste generated by the health sector is managed soundly and future waste is minimized Broken thermometers: 236.81 kg/a. Broken thermometers: 210.81 kg/a. In broken thermometers: 200 kg/a. Number of mercury thermometers replaced and safely disposed of. Data from RoK MEP, and RoK MPH, and target hospitals Procurement delays Slow process of mercury devices replacement by hospitals. Health facilities accept new technology and gradually phase out mercury devices. Component 1: Stockholm Convention NIP update and improved institutional coordination on chemical MEAs Outcome 1.1: POPs inventories improved for informed decision making and priority setting Capacity building programme (trainings) for involved stakeholders developed and implemented on POPs risks, inventories, POPs tracking, monitoring of data reported by Training on PCBs inventory and management is being carried out in the framework of the UNDP PCB project. No training on new POPs is currently planned on POPs issue in Kazakhstan Limited information Conventional training material completed and disseminated; One (1) workshop and one (1) training for trainers completed for relevant stakeholders in the public and industrial sectors; Web tool for on line training completed and published; At least three (3) complementary trainings completed; Training effectiveness assessed (with both training feedback from the trainees and final tests ) Training materials developed and printed; Training reports; Feedback from training Result of training tests. Activity of Technical resource for conducting training is available; There is enough motivation to participate in training. Few
responsible parties. on new POPs is available Training effectiveness assessed (with both training feedback from the trainees and final tests) Number of requests for data sent out and processed Number of visits made to related stakeholders Number of requests for data sent out and processed Number of visits made to related stakeholders trained teams in data collection Web tool published participants in training sessions; training not effective Lack of cooperation of data collection teams with information holders National information system (inventory) on POPs expanded (updated information on uPOPs and new POPs). Original 2003-2005 uPOPs inventory conducted with a limited set of industrial sources and outdated. Inventory of POPs pesticides stockpiles and burial sites limited to 20% of the country at the NIP stage. Under the sectoral programs “Zhasyl Damu (Green Growth) for 2010-2014”, adopted by the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated September 10, 2010 # 924, a detailed inventory of all POPs and obsolete pesticides is envisaged but not started yet. POPs Regular Inventory Mechanism established. Industrial sources of uPOPs identified. Statistical database for the calculation of uPOPs inventory built and validated. Industries using new POPs or recycling waste containing new POPs identified. Reports from responsible parties reviewed and data limitations revealed Data quality and consistency evaluated with recommendations for improvement At least 60% of the questionnaire survey completed and elaborated. Inventory of pesticide stockpiles or uPOPs inventory completed using the most recent data available. POPs inventories updated for uPOPs and POPs pesticides, covering all the territory of Kazakhstan. Industrial use of new POPs identified and possible chemical and non-chemical alternatives assessed. Inventory of stockpiles and burial sites of pesticides covering at least 70% of the country. Plan for maintaining and completing the above inventories elaborated and institutional responsibilities assigned. An information system on inventories of POPs substances established Summary inventory reports for each specific POPs substance. Information system built and regularly updated with new data. Report on alternatives to industrial POPs drafted Resources and technical capacities, including technical assistants, are qualitatively and quantitatively enough for conducting a thorough inventory. Lack of coordination and motivation may lead to incomplete results / coverage of the inventory. Insufficient funding and are a risk to the establishment of a permanent inventory mechanism. Data
burial sites extended to at least 40% of the country. Inventory of PCBs updated by coordination with the UNDP PCB project. limitations and from respondents Outcome 1.2: National capacities on POPs monitoring, analytical capabilities are assessed Studies on existing POPs analytical and monitoring capabilities for the whole range of POPs (with focus on new POPs) carried out A few laboratories identified in the course of NIP preparation and GEF/UNDP PCB management programme. Laboratories are currently only nationally accredited for PCB analyses Draft POPs national monitoring plan developed by RECETOX – a Stockholm Convention’s Regional Centre in the Czech Republic. uPOPs analysis methods included in the national register; Laboratories capacities for uPOPs analysis and POPs in goods and environment assessed. national POPs monitoring plan submitted to government for approval. National POPs monitoring plan approved as part of relevant national policies and documents. Participation in regional monitoring networks. Laboratory assessment reports National registers (analysis methods, laboratories, etc); National environmental monitoring programs Weak analytical equipment at laboratories does not allow upgrades, only investment in new tools A small number of interested and supporting laboratories identified limits project’s activities. National partners lack interest and funding for POPs monitoring. A set of recommendations for the improvement of such capabilities formulated and submitted to the Government No full range of POPs and POPs in goods/environment is handled by existing laboratories No national consultations held on priorities No action plan is in place for improvements Qualified laboratories are identified for further accreditation Cost of accreditation is estimated Consultations held and roadmap prepared At least two (2) laboratories accredited to perform uPOPs analysis in goods/environment; Project reports Laboratory accreditation information logs Interested laboratories are easily identified and agree to participate through Cost of accreditation too high Sampling cost too high for
wider acceptance Outcome 1.3: Policy, institutional frameworks and enabling regulatory environment are in place to ensure better control on POPs accumulation and emissions Institutional coordination and compliance with international agreements improved through firmer institutionalization of POPs issues into national structures No POPs coordination center in existence due to lengthy Government’s approval procedures and unaligned MEP mandate, and mismatch of proposed workplans (to 2028) with 3 year long financial planning processes POPs coordination happens in a fragmented manner with no alignment of roles Nu funding sources to sustain POPs coordination function are available Roles and responsibilities of related stakeholders defined Draft regulation defining TOR and potential Government’s funding sources of the POPs coordinating mechanism established POPs intersectoral working group (mechanism) established (for example, as part of the “Green Development” Center) NGO’s participation and input considered in the composition of the mechanism POPs group meets regularly to guide the NIP update process Institutionalization of new POPs issues into relevant line ministries ensured according to defined roles. Coordination mechanisms on POPs issues institutionalized and embedded into draft regulations sent for Government’s review and approval. Funding sources to ensure the mechanism’s sustainability are defined, consulted on with MoF, and proposed for inclusion in national planning Project reports; Approved TOR of the coordinating mechanism; POPs group’s meeting reports Relevant draft regulations; Reports and decisions on funding sources for the mechanism GoK is committed toward the implementation of a sound and integrated mechanism for the management of POPs. Environmental and social impact review of proposed legislation is timely and successful Public consultations are positive and supportive of proposed legislation Time required for approval of new regulation through parliamentary bodies exceeds timeframe of the project. National legal framework, by aligning institutional roles, reviewed and improved to include the issue of insofar unaddressed POPs, uPOPs and new POPs Ecological Code contains only general information on POPs management (chapter 40 on dangerous chemicals), with amendments related to PCBs supported by GEF/UNDP programme on PCBs The Government has plans to extend the provisions of chapter 40 to regulate emissions uPOPs Preliminary report on the improvement of current regulatory system drafted. One (1) stakeholder consultation workshop conducted. Review and update of EcoCode and other key regulations covering chemicals management (number of legislations reviewed and updated) Final report on the improvement of current regulatory system for including the issues of insofar unaddressed POPs, uPOPs and new POPs. Amended regulation drafted and submitted. Project reports; Draft legislation documents Number of consultations held Workshop reports
MEP plans measures to improve the operational control of industrial emissions, including burning of fuels, and promote the construction and modernization of facilities for cleaning exhaust gases in the steel industry. Sectoral technical guidelines updated to include the issue of priority POPs, including sampling and analysis methods Guidelines and action plans are being drafted on the sectors related to POPs waste and PCBs, under the UNDP PCB project under Zhasyl Damu (Green Growth) initiative. Preliminary draft of the guidelines completed and disseminated to the relevant stakeholders (Government, Industry, NGOs) for amendment Results of stakeholder consultations Technical guidelines and action plans on POPs are submitted for approval by relevant state bodies. Draft and final guidelines; Review reports. Workshop reports Sufficient technical and financial resources made available; In consultation process, guidelines become too general or not sufficiently tailored to the country needs; Guidelines are not approved for endorsement at the governmental level. Capacity building programme (trainings) and consultations for involved stakeholders developed and implemented on POPs related risks, POPs monitoring, institutional roles and responsibilities, No national training held on new POPs, developments in the Stockholm Convention and NIP update guidelines; Currently prevailing insufficient knowledge on new POPs, their risks and control measures and approaches At least, three (3) trainings held on general POPs issues and NIP update process, in particular One hundred (100) stakeholders participated in trainings Results of stakeholder At least, two (2) complementary workshops held Sixty (60) stakeholders participated in workshops Results of stakeholder consultations NIP update formulated Project, workshop and media reports Stakeholder collaboration Trained stakeholders are prepared and apply received knowledge in daily functions
POPs control legislation benchmarks and enforcement consultations National Implementation Plan (NIP) on Stockholm Convention obligations with inclusion of new POPs reviewed and updated, with elaboration of specific action plans on new POPs. The Government is carrying out several non-coordinated actions on POPs (update of inventories on pesticidal POPs in 5 regions, PCB management, inventory and partial disposal, planning better control of uPOPs, improving of existing regulations). Updated NIP structure and content agreed in consultations with relevant stakeholders. A first draft of updated NIP prepared which contains preliminary draft of the inventory, guidelines, legislation and action plan and circulated. Final draft of the NIP completed and circulated for review within the main stakeholders. Updated NIP submitted for approval to the Government, approved and submitted to the Secretariat. Project reports Draft and final NIP update documents Comments from the relevant stakeholders; Consultations are as wide as possible for priority setting Difficulties in reach agreement on NIP content and objectives. Lack of commitment, of one or more partners could result in a not properly coordinated effort and in a weak NIP update. Outcome 1.4: Improved institutional coordination on chemical MEAs Review and better alignment of ministerial functions on implementation of Conventions’ obligations No or very fragmented institutional structure overseeing chemicals MEAs Lack of common knowledge on synergies between chemical MEAs Functional review of stakeholders’ functions is complete for improvement drafted Stakeholder consultations held for priority selection Roadmap in place for joint coordination of MEAs Draft regulation to selected recommendations is in place Project and meeting reports Draft regulations Mobilization and agreement of stakeholders to support the function alignment NGOs participate in the review process Delays in reviewing and approving legislation No financial backing to the mechanism agreed with the Government Roles and Establishment of coordination mechanisms to support synergistic implementation of Stockholm, Rotterdam and Basel Conventions and established No conceptual understanding (strategy) on the synergism and collaborative operation of responsible parties No or very fragmented institutional structure overseeing Drafting and approval of a joint synergistic action plan (concept, strategy note) for the implementation of the Stockholm, Basel and Rotterdam conventions Draft legislation supporting establishment of the coordinating mechanism submitted for review and approval Temporary (with GEF/UNDP project’s help) and fixed Functional review report Draft legislation Media reports Stakeholder consultations
developed access web-site Outline of National mercury reduction plan developed No national mercury assessment made, except in form of waste product No mercury action plan in place outlining priority action and setting budgetary allocations Consultations with stakeholders are held, inclusive coordination with GEF/UNEP’s region programme Future plan’s outline and proposed legislative improvements (inclusive release standards) to control mercury management drafted Data collection and assessment initiated Required data collected and analysed, and discussed in stakeholder forums Priorities identified and agreed with stakeholders Draft National Mercury Reduction plan is formally reviewed and cleared by relevant line Ministries and submitted for final approval. Survey reports Respondent feedback reports Delayed consultation and clearance process with line ministries and important stakeholders Public awareness raising campaigns on mercury risks conducted Low awareness of sources of mercury in consumer goods and consequences of their improper disposal. Public awareness campaign developed 50% of planned awareness activities carried out by MTE. Remaining 50% of activities designed in the awareness campaign accomplished Project reports Media reports Publication materials are developed and available Existing funding limitations Component 3: Minimization of unintentional POPs and mercury releases in selected hospitals through demonstration of sound Waste Management approaches Outcome 3.1: Sound health-care waste management through uPOPs and mercury reduction approaches are demonstrated in regions of the country Review of national policies and update of HCWM regulatory framework and road map No comprehensive conceptual note on improving HCWM policies is in existence No currently established emission standard for waste incineration (POPs, heavy metals). No legal provisions exist, except minimum temperature standard for healthcare waste Existing fragmented national policies fully reviewed with recommendations for improvement along with road map defining strategy and timeline for HCWM plan implementation developed; Consultations with stakeholders, including regional Legislative improvements (through amendments in the EcoCode) are submitted for final approval by the Government. Technical standard for hazardous healthcare waste treatment, including methods, is established in close consultations and forms Project reports Legislative documents Meeting and consultation reports Drafting and final approval of proposed legislative changes are delayed Sufficient political support to pass and enforce the standard. Initial resistance to
incineration. No technical standards set for hazardous healthcare waste treatment, including methods. No current requirements defined for waste management plans and country budget does not consider technologies for wider replication. Public procurement rules do not include provisions on EPP (procured products can still contain heavy metals and other harmful substances), and the lowest price criterion is the main foundation. Reporting systems (on waste amounts, tracking and monitoring) are underdeveloped authorities in target regions and service providers are held (at least, two workshops); List of products and services to be included in the public procurement rules submitted to stakeholders for discussion. Legislative amendments, inclusive emission standards and financial disincentives, are drafted, consulted with key stakeholders (government, civil society, NGOs etc). Awareness raising workshops and media reports (at least, 3 expanded workshops for medical and private sectors, and 5 media reports) a part of legislative improvements Public procurement rules are amended and EPP criteria are set Awareness raising workshops and media reports (at least, 3 complementary workshops for medical and private sectors, and 10 media reports) National reporting to POPs convention improved comply with new regulations Installations that do not comply with the emission standard are gradually removed from operation. Batch type burners are removed from consideration as final solution and gradually reduced from use. Current pricing policy is easily adjustable to optimize the work of the HCWM system Development of Regional HCWM Management Plan in selected provinces Baseline situation indicates no concerted action with adherence to BAT/BEP in medical sector Sector is fragmented with disorganized players with no systemic approach to resolving uPOPs, mercury issues and In selected provinces, all HCW generators and waste disposal installations and companies are identified and mapped. The core data is collected and process of it verification is in progress. The Management Plan is adopted, and further actions and investments scheduled Roadmap to support its implementation is approved by participating stakeholders Project reports Management Plan documentation Meeting and media reports Published official documentation Low political will, no interest and resistance from regional authorities. Limited cooperation from public and private sector Parallel improvements in
management system is weak waste disposal services. Establishment of HCW treatment centres in selected sites Overall waste management system is weak Health facilities have no access to organised waste treatment system or the waste is incinerated in installations not fulfilling BEP/BAT criteria. No non-incineration technologies procured and adopted to support new management system in selected regions Waste disposal and transportation of waste in peripheral areas (away from municipal or capital centers) is disadvantaged due to high price Low quality of service provision results in additional sanitary risks Tender is held and the winning bid(s) is/are selected. EIA and permit procedure is carried on At least 8 rural and 2 urban HCW treatment centres established with demonstration supplied, installed and commissioned Transportation: vehicles supplied or reconstructed to meet ADR standards (6 items) Transportation and waste disposal pricing recommendations drafted for stakeholder review (criteria per weight or volume) HCW treatment centres successfully operate at preliminary planned capacity (950 tpa). Pricing policies implemented at target groups of stakeholders and service providers Applicable recommendations on possible pricing criteria proposed for legislative amendments Waste reduction amounts and uPOPs reductions are measured and reported on Facility documentation and reports, including microbial inactivation efficacy, waste log, and financial assessment. On-site verification Project reports ‘Business as usual’ approach dominates despite project’s efforts Improved planning on the regional level allows fostering and developing waste disposal services. Resistance to new approaches from existing private HCW treatment initiatives Cost effectiveness of non-combustion methods attracts private and public investors. Outcome 3.2: Linkages between sound HCWM practices and minimization of uPOPs and mercury demonstrated through training and awareness raising programmes Development and dissemination of BAT/BEP technical guidelines and general awareness raising No technical BAT/BEP guidelines in line with international benchmarks (SC, BC) for uPOPs/mercury release reduction and HCW management in place No guidance materials for data collection and Baseline information is collected and processed. Draft technical guidelines (concept, scope, and content) prepared and consulted with stakeholders. Project team Technical guidelines approved and printed (legislative support to back guidelines proposed) Hospitals receive materials for application in daily work Project team participates in scientific medical conferences (at Printed draft and final guidelines Project reports Media reports Changes to national curricula of medical institutions Required partnerships are developed and support to the process secured Stakeholder participation is ensured Media support is expected on a wider scale
learned extracted. with lessons learnt at 30 months of implementation. mid-term evaluation report. agencies and other organizations. Annex B. Total Budget and Work Plan Award ID: 00071893 Project ID(s): 00085149 Award Title: NIP update, integration of POPs into national planning and promoting sound healthcare waste management in Kazakhstan Business Unit: KAZ10 Project Title: NIP update, integration of POPs into national planning and promoting sound healthcare waste management in Kazakhstan PIMS no. 4612 Implementing Partner (Executing Agency) United Nations Development Program GEF Outcome/Atlas Activity Responsible Party/Implementing Agent Fund ID Donor Name Atlas Budgetary Account Code ATLAS Budget Description Amount Year 1 (USD) Amount Year 2 (USD) Amount Year 3 (USD) Amount Year 4 (USD) Total (USD) See Budget Note: Component 1: Stockholm Convention NIP update and improved institutional coordination on chemical MEA UNDP 62000 GEF 71200 International consultants 10,000 15,000 10,000 15,000 50,000 1 71300 National consultants 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 120,000 2 72100 Contractual services 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 52,000 3 71600 Travel 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 48,000 4 75700 Workshops 12,500 25,000 12,500 25,000 75,000 5 74200 Communications and publications (television, web, print, etc.) 5,000 5,000 5,000 15,000 30,000 6 sub-total GEF 82,500 100,000 82,500 110,000 375,000 Total Outcome 1 82,500 100,000 82,500 110,000 375,000 375,000 Component 2: Overall mercury situation assessed and UNDP 62000 GEF 71200 International consultants 12,000 0 0 0 12,000 1 71300 National consultants 32,000 32,000 5,000 5,000 74,000 2 72100 Contractual services 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 12,000 3