zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
For SCE and SDG&E, the deadband will be considered exceeded when there is a decline of at least 7.5 percent in the number of top 100 high-cost hours that fall within the summer peak and mid-peak period. The definition of Base TOU period remains unchanged as defined in Decision D.17-01-006 and any changes to the definition is beyond the scope of this resolution. A workshop to further consider deadband tolerance methodological issues would be of limited value, and would compete with higher-priority needs. Therefore, it is Ordered: PG&E AL 5037-E is approved with the following modifications: PG&E shall use a 5 percent differential as a trigger; PG&E shall not use marginal transmission costs for its current deadband analyses. Transmission and distribution marginal costs shall be included in the future calculation of the deadband analysis if used by the Commission to determine TOU periods. SCE AL 3581-E is approved with the following modifications: SCE shall use the top high-cost 100-hour criterion only; SCE shall use a 7.5 percent differential as a trigger; the deadband will be considered exceeded when there is a decline of at least 7.5 percent in the number of top 100 high-cost hours that fall within the summer peak and mid-peak period, or a decline of at least 7.5 percent in the number of top 100 low-cost hours that fall within the winter super-off-peak period. Transmission and distribution marginal costs shall be included in the calculation of the deadband analysis if used by the Commission to determine TOU periods. SDG&E AL 3064-E is approved with the following modifications:
If assistance is needed from an organiser, it is essential that all sections of the Case Form have been completed before it is forwarded to the regional office. A Conditions for providing assistance 1. UNISON seeks to ensure that members are provided with the best possible advice and assistance to achieve a satisfactory outcome to matters of grievance and discipline. UNISON will determine the most appropriate representative for your case. This may mean reallocating the case at a later stage and you will be informed of any such decision. 2. UNISON representatives and members are expected under UNISON rules to treat one another with respect. Failure to do so by a UNISON representative will entitle you to make a complaint in accordance with UNISON’s Complaints Procedure: http://www.unison.org.uk/upload/sharepoint/ Policies/COMPLAINTS_PROCEDURE.pdf. Failure by you to treat your representative with respect may lead to support being withdrawn from you. 3. At all times, action taken on your behalf will be on the basis of agreement reached between you and your representative about the best way UNISON can assist you. Throughout the procedure you will be kept informed and no decision will be made without first consulting you. Should you decide at any point not to accept the advice of your UNISON representative then you are free to proceed without UNISON assistance. Please inform UNISON if you no longer require UNISON’s assistance in these circumstances. 4. The Legal Services Agreement must be signed if a potential legal claim is identified. UNISON supports claims to an Employment Tribunal, where a legal claim has been assessed by our solicitors as having reasonable prospects of success. 5. Until UNISON or its solicitors confirms in writing that it is acting for you in a legal claim, any responsibility for lodging a claim in an Employment Tribunal or Court (including County Courts, Sheriff Courts and appeal Courts) is yours alone. 6. UNISON representation is provided on the understanding that UNISON is your sole representative. UNISON cannot be held responsible for any costs or
For members of self-organised groups – details of any SOG officer supporting you Title First Name Initial(s) Surname Address 1 Address 2 Address 3 Postcode Contact telephone Member employment details Job title/occupation Payroll Number Employment commenced Employment ended Permanent Temporary Casual Fixed Term Contract Full-time Part-time Job share Basic hours per week Basic wage per week £ OR Basic salary per month £ Average take home pay per week £ Average take home pay per month £ Other bonuses or benefits per week £ Other bonuses or benefits per month £ Employer Head Office Name
Telephone Number Email Branch details Branch Number/ Code 00000 Service Group Branch Name Address 1 Address 2 Town/City County Postcode Telephone Number Details of action taken If the member’s complaint is a grievance matter, please confirm whether the member’s complaint has been put in writing to the employer. If not, please explain the reason for not doing so. Otherwise please enter the date of the letter to the employer and attach a copy to this form. Date of letter
Fitness to practice (Please complete if member has been reported to their professional body) Name of registration body Professional registration PIN number Disclosure and Barring scheme Are you barred from working for either the Disclosure and Barring scheme or Disclosure Scotland? Barred adults list YES NO (please tick box) Barred childrens list YES NO (please tick box) Case details (Please use continuation sheet if necessary) Date of incident (or most recent incident) which is the subject of this case Please give as much detail as possible, including dates of any incidents, meetings or conversations, and who was involved. If a meeting or hearing has been arranged please give details below. Please attach copies of any relevant correspondence.
Payment of the award shall include compound interest at the rate earned on prime, three-month non-financial commercial paper as reported in Federal Reserve Statistical Release H.15, beginning May 2, 2017, the 75th day after the filing of Clean Coalition’s request, and continuing until full payment is made. The comment period for today’s decision is waived. This decision is effective today. Dated __________________, at Sacramento, California.
Decision BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking to Implement Registration of Third Party Natural Gas Procurement Service Providers, Known as “Core Transport Agents,” pursuant to Public Utilities Code Sections 980-989.5 to Regulate non-rate matters, including Registration Standards, Complaint Resolution Practices, and Minimum Standards of Consumer Protection. Rulemaking 14-03-002 DECISION GRANTING COMPENSATION TO CENTER FOR ACCESSIBLE TECHNOLOGY FOR SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION TO DECISION (D.) 14-08-043 AND D.18-02-002 Intervenor: Center for Accessible Technology (CforAT) For contribution to Decision (D.) 14-08-043 and D.18-02-002 Claimed: $50,062.50 Awarded: $44,482.50 Assigned Commissioner: Carla J. Peterman Assigned ALJ: Kelly A. Hymes
Intervenor Claim Date Amount Requested Amount Awarded Multiplier? Reason Change/Disallowance Center for Accessible Technology (CforAT) 4/16/18 $50,062.50 $44,482.50 N/A See CPUC Disallowances and Adjustments, above. Advocate Information First Name Last Name Type Intervenor Hourly Fee Requested Year Hourly Fee Requested Hourly Fee Adopted Melissa Kasnitz Attorney CforAT $450 2014 $450 Melissa Kasnitz Attorney CforAT $450 2015 $450 Melissa Kasnitz Attorney CforAT $465 2017 $465 Michael Iseri Attorney CforAT $210 2017 $210 (END OF APPENDIX)
Southern New England Chapter of ANNA Cordially invites you to attend our Spring Conference Renal Roulette 2016 May 19, 2015 Mohegan Sun Casino The Cabaret Theater Topics Include: Hepatitis C CROWNWeb Update New Ideas for/Complications of PD What’s New with Water Systems? How Do The New Potassium Supplements Work? Discharge planning for difficult acute patient / Caring for that patient in the Chronic Setting To Register: Click on the Renal Roulette link (Under Upcoming Events) at: If you have questions, please email: Hotel Block: The Hyatt Place – Mohegan Sun – Code G-ANNA1 Rate: $99 + tax good until 4/22/16 [ 2049 Norwich-New London Tpke., Uncasville, CT 06382] 1 Mohegan Sun Boulevard in Uncasville, CT 06382 Park in Riverside Garage – Enter @ Casino of the Sky
help Help provided? pain-non visible Not from point of enrolment but from in class discussion with teachers physical disability. Access issues accommodated Note taker provided loss- referred by external agency. Provision of note taker assisted mental illness and led to later informal disclosure of mental illness 2 Learning support offered Later disclosure of mental illness and effective reasonable adjustment provided 1/8 Assistance to reapply for VISA 3/7 Altered and extended assessment tasks 0 Later disclosure of mental illness and ineffective reasonable adjustment provided 2/8 Insufficient time allowed 0 Non disclosure of mental illness at end of study period 4/8 1/7 (contact lost with 3 students, 2 of whom had not disclosed at time of first interview) 1/1 0/4 (contact lost with one student who had not disclosed at time of first interview)
Table 4: Timing, reasons and outcomes of disclosure for students Name, gender, age Diagnosis Disclose at enrolment & request help Disclose at enrolment & not request help Later disclosure & help received Later disclosure & no help received Reason for disclosure Reason for non disclosure Course completion or effective progression Would disclose in future? D-M-29 years Asperger’s Anxiety No Yes – extension Obligation – “I need more time” Yes Completion Required longer time Maybe M-F 57 years Depression PTSD, Anxiety No Yes – extension Yes Obligation (had to tell something) Yes Completion Probably N-F 21 years Depression No Yes Opportunity to re-apply for visa Desperation (visa) No Fail most subjects Prefer not to S-F 24 years Schizoaffective disorder No Risk of rejection Yes Progression No K-F 22 years Depression and Anxiety No Yes – extension Obligation Explain absence Yes Progression Probably F-F 35 years Bi polar disorder Yes Yes Advocacy – integration of illness into self Yes Progression Probably not M-M 55 years Psychotic depression Yes Altered assess tasks Advocacy Yes Completion Yes C-F 29 years Depression No Risk- and regret what do you say? Yes Completion No J-F 34 years Depression Yes Yes Desperation No Fail most subjects Probably not E-F 22 years Anxiety No Risk – not serious enough Yes Progression No M-F 45 years Depression No Risk of rejection Yes Progression No
A-M 29 years Depression and Anxiety No Yes Extension but too little Desperation of failure No-fail one subject No V-F 24 years Psychotic depression Yes Desperation – fear of failure Yes Completion But took 2 years instead of 1 Probably B-F 52 years Anxiety and depression No Regret – ‘what could anyone do?” No Fail most subjects No C-F 24 years Depression PTSD No Disclosed physical condition Yes Completion But took 6 years instead of 3 No SJ-F 27 years Depression and anxiety No Protection of self Risk to reputation Yes Progression No A-F 55 years Depression No Yes Desperation Lost contact B-M 26 years Anxiety, Substance No Risk to reputation Lost contact K-M 36 years Use disorder Schizophrenia Yes Honesty – “most people already know” Lost contact J-F 27yrs Depression No Risk of rejection Lost contact
**************************************************************************************************
REQUIRED CENTRAL STAFFING INFORMATION Use of form: This form is used to provide information so that placement decisions for children in need of out-of-home care placement can be made. Personally identifiable information is used only for that purpose. The Social Security Number is not mandatory, but may be needed to obtain a temporary medical card. Instructions: A cover page summary describing the child and what the child’s needs are that may necessitate placement into a higher level of care must be attached. Name – Case Manager Region Telephone Number Name – Case Manager’s Supervisor Telephone Number Ongoing IA Other – Specify: Date – Current Staffing Date – Central Staffing Form Completed Date – Internal Staffing Approval Signature From Program Manager Date – Target Date for Placement Provide statement of child’s needs and expected outcomes from higher level of care agency. Physical / Medical Information Name – Child Birthdate Age Social Security Number Gender Ethnicity Height – Approximate Weight – Approximate Current Medication(s) and Dosage – Specify: Name – Prescribing Physician Significant Medical Conditions – Specify: Physical Limitations – Specify: Allergies – Specify: Yes No Child has Asthma Name – Child’s Pediatrician Telephone Number Date – Last Physical Exam Yes No Is child current on immunizations? If “No”, immunizations child needs – Specify: Date – TB test Results of TB test Current Placement (Status) Own home Kinship relative Licensed relative Foster care Treatment foster care Hospital Group care RCCCY Name – Assessment center: Name – Stabilization center: Name – Assessment home: Name – Other – Specify: Date – Placed in current placement: Name – Current placement: Address – Current placement: Telephone Number – Current placement: If child is not in own home, what date was the child removed from their home? Reason child was removed from home – Specify: Date – Last CST: Date – Next scheduled CST: Permanency Plan
Skills Proven ability to effectively communicate with both written and verbal skills Ability to develop and sustain professional relationships Proven ability to make assessment of need Proven ability to work effectively as part of a team Proven ability to work effectively on own initiative Proven ability to work in partnership with parents ensuring children’s needs are met Proven ability to lead, motivate, support and supervise work Excellent time management skills and proven ability to prioritise work E/D E E E E E E Knowledge Understanding of child development Understanding of the needs of vulnerable children, their carers and the communities in which they live. Proven knowledge of Safeguarding, Health and Safety including risk assessments and other legislative requirements. An understanding of legislation and guidance associated with parenting and family support E/D E E E D Experience Experience in working with vulnerable children and their families in an appropriate setting Proven success in developing and maintaining effective working relationships and partnerships with other services and agencies Experience of working with a school and or children’s centre setting E/D E E D Qualifications An appropriate professional qualification e.g. NVQ Level 3 in relevant area or equivalent relevant experience E/D E Special Requirements and Environmental Factors post holder must hold a current and full driving licence and have access to appropriate transport. A flexible approach to working processes that accept the need for change in relation to needs is essential. E/D E E
PLEASE NOTE: A Foundation authorized signer must sign the Scholarship Payment Request. A list of Foundation fund authorized signers can be accessed through BANNER or the USF Foundation Reports on the USF eportal. If the payment or award is made to a student and involves travel please refer to the Foundation's policy on and the University's tax manager's policy on to ensure the payment is treated properly as a scholarship distribution or an expense reimbursement (non-taxable working condition fringe benefit) Only payments to USF for financial aid can be made from scholarship funds. Payments for plaques or scholarship related events must be paid from a departmental operating fund unless these payments are specifically documented by the donor in the purpose of the scholarship fund. For assistance with determining the amount available to award please utilize the Scholarship Application available under USF Foundation Reports on the USF portal. Please contact the USF Foundation Scholarship Administrator for further questions. OTHER Training Materials Last Updated 11/30/2010 12:52 PM This process lists USF Foundation Training Materials related to processing USF Foundation transactions. Process Additional USF Foundation training materials on subjects such as Spending Money in Funds, Setting up Funds, and USF Foundation Investments are under construction and will be coming soon. If you have a specific question, please go to 'Ask a Question' on the home page. Foundation Contact List and Organizational Chart Last Updated 03/15/2010 02:23 PM USF Foundation Office of Business and Financial Affairs
Qualifications NVQ Level 2 qualification (or equivalent) Full driving licence (at School’s discretion) NVQ Level 2 qualification in Caretaking (or equivalent) NVQ Level 3 qualification in Caretaking (or equivalent) MiDAS (Minibus Awareness Driving Scheme) Application Experience Experience of supervising staff. Experience of budget management Experience of planning and programming work Ability to prioritise work Ability to manage time effectively. Ability to work effectively and supportively as a member of the school team Ability to act on own initiative, dealing with any unexpected problems that arise Experience of undertaking a caretaker or site supervisory function Experience of undertaking a range of cleaning duties Experience of writing maintenance programmes. Experience of testing portable electrical equipment Experience of working within a school Practical experience of monitoring contract arrangements Application References Knowledge, skills and understanding Knowledge of Health & Safety Regulations as they relate to the operation of cleaning equipment and the dilution of cleaning materials – COSHH Ability to develop effective working relationships Attention to detail skills Ability to work as part of a team Able to communicate clearly and follow instructions with a wide range of people, good interpersonal skills. Good oral and written communication skills Ability to communicate flexible attitude to work Ability to work in an organised and methodical way Ability to manage, train and develop staff Knowledge of Recruitment and Selection procedures IT skills First aid certificate Application References Interview
6. Support needs of the foster family Yes No Are there any services or supports that you or your family need at this time? If “Yes”, describe any needed services. 7. Other Describe any other information you think is relevant. SIGNATURE – Person Completing Form Date Signed Return this questionnaire to at least 10 business days prior to the scheduled hearing.
$ 327 $ 759 $ 432 June $ 343 $ 690 $ 347 July $ 363 $ 681 $ 318 August $ 329 $ 782 $ 453 September $ 302 $ 791 $ 489 October $ 459 $ 898 $ 439 November $ 407 $ 923 $ 516 December Do you want to end program? (Enter no or yes): yes The Pseudocode Module main() //Declare local variables Declare endProgram = “no” While endProgram == “no” Declare Real notGreenCost[12] Declare Real goneGreenCost[12] Declare Real savings[12] Declare String months[12] = “January”, “February”, “March”, “April”, “May”, “June”, “July”, “August”, “September”, “October”, “November”, “December” //function calls getNotGreen(notGreenCost, months) getGoneGreen(goneGreenCost, months) energySaved(notGreenCost, goneGreenCosts, savings) displayInfo(notGreenCost, goneGreenCosts, savings, months) Display “Do you want to end the program? Yes or no” Input endProgram End While End Module Module getNotGreen(Real notGreenCost[], String months[]) Set counter = 0 While counter < 12 Display “Enter NOT GREEN energy costs for”, months[counter] Input notGreenCosts[counter] Set counter = counter + 1 End While End Module Module getGoneGreen(Real goneGreenCost[], String months[]) Set counter = 0
6. Are there specific overriding considerations that merit approval notwithstanding the unavoidable environmental impacts of the portion of the project before the Commission? 7. Has the Commission reviewed and considered the relevant portions of the Mid-Coast Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement and Subsequent Environmental Impact Report, and the Interstate 5 North Coast Corridor Project Final Environmental Impact Report / Environmental Impact Statement? 8. Whether it is in the public interest to have a crossing at the realigned Campus Point Drive in San Diego, California. 9. Whether the Commission should grant SANDAG a period of five years to complete the project from the date a final decision in this proceeding is issued. The Scoping Memo found that hearings were not necessary, and no hearings were held in this proceeding. As the application of SANDAG was unopposed, the matter was considered submitted on the date the scoping memo was issued. The scoping memo held that public review and comment for the proposed decision in this proceeding should be waived pursuant to Rule 14.6(c)(2). Jurisdiction The Commission has jurisdiction over this Application pursuant to Public Utilities (Pub. Util.) Code §§ 1201 to 1205. Compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act The Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project constitutes a project under the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). (Cal. Pub. Resources Code § 21000 et seq.;
7 Managing Stress ☐ 8 Manual Handling & Back Care ☐ 9 Occupational Health & Safety Representatives ☒ 10 Workers’ Compensation & Rehabilitation, Including Incident Reporting ☐ Version: 4/2/2016 Authorised officer: Senior Lecturer, Community Services Approved: Head of Division, Enterprise and Employment Pathways Review by:
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT Reportable Case No: 20808/2014 In the matter between: ANDREW CHARLES BROOKSTEIN APPELLANT and JEANETTE BROOKSTEIN RESPONDENT Neutral citation: Brookstein v Brookstein (20808/14) [2016] ZASCA 40 (24 March 2016) Coram: Maya AP, Swain JA and Tsoka, Baartman and Kathree-Setiloane AJJA Heard: 26 February 2016 Delivered: 24 March 2016 Summary: Arbitration Act 42 of 1965 – interpretation of ‘matrimonial cause or matter incidental to such cause’ in s 2 of the Act – court order incorporating settlement agreement disposed of all matrimonial issues and its natural consequences – deliberate non-disclosure of true value of accrual – delictual claim susceptible to arbitration – Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984 – date for determination of value of accrual – date of dissolution appropriate date, not litis contestatio.
SOFTWARE: For each software program listed below, check the boxes as appropriate. Microsoft Word 2013 or higher: No Proficiency (No knowledge or ability) Basic: This level of skill is sufficient to perform daily word processing tasks, such as, producing routine letters, memos, and informal reports. A person with this level of skill is able to use basic formatting, editing, printing functions, and understands the document page setup. I possess the skills to: Create a new document, enter text, and save it. Open and edit existing documents. Select and move text. Format characters and paragraphs; work with tabs, indents, margins, lists, breaks, spacing. Use Spell/Grammar check and Help tools. Create and edit tables. Print documents, envelopes, and labels. Expert: This level of skill is necessary in order to use and create a variety of templates, complex tables, merges; manage table data, sort and filter merges. A person with this level of skill is able to customize toolbars, import and insert graphs, embed Excel data, and elaborate reports. I possess the skills to: Work with sections, create templates, use styles, and customize them. Create and format complex tables and manage table data. Create Mail Merges, sort and filter them. Customize Toolbars. Insert graphic elements. Add hyperlinks. Advanced: This level of skill is required in order to produce very large, complex formal documents that require a table of contents, footnotes, endnotes, bookmarks, and other special elements. A person with this level of skill is able to use and create a wide range of graphic effects and has full mastery of Macro commands. I possess the skills to: Work with advanced styles and AutoFormat features, linking styles. Use graphic effects such as dropped capital letters and clip art/photos, insert WordArt, and draw in a document. Work with very large documents that require a table of contents, footnotes, endnotes, and Manage and track document changes, using highlights and comments. Manage Macro commands and create dialogue boxes.
Davis Lacrosse – Volunteer Coaches’ Check List 2012 No. Item By/On 1 Register as a coach with the Davis Lacrosse Association . During this process, you will either establish or renew, if necessary, your US Lacrosse membership which must be valid through 6/30/2012. In addition you are required to complete the background check information with NCSI which is integrated into the DLA coach’s registration process. 1/20/12 Mandatory 2 Provide scanned copy of current driver’s license if not already on file with the DLA 1/20/12 Mandatory 3 Complete and return W-9, if getting reimbursements 1/20/12 Mandatory 4 Review volunteer contractor agreement, sign and return one copy 1/20/12 Mandatory 5 Read, sign and mail in the to Davis Lacrosse Association, P.O. Box 72251, Davis, CA 95617 1/20/12 Mandatory 6 Provide proof of completion of PCA training (signed and dated card) within the past 36 months. Next workshop session January 25, 2012 (El Dorado Hills). No charge. Register at The Online PCA course, although not as good as the workshop is an alternative. Go to and use the discount code SOCstBWk. The DLA will reimburse online participants $15.00 once evidence of payment and proof of completion is provided to the Coaching Coordinator. 1/25/12 Mandatory 7 Complete On Line Level 1 course. to go to registration page. Access to drills and skills after completing this course make this a worthwhile investment of time. 1/30/2012 Mandatory 8 Complete 1/30/2012 Mandatory 9 Participate and complete Level 1 coach’s Instructional clinic. Bella Vista High School, Fair Oaks, CA; Feb 4, 2012. The cost is $65.00. Sign up on line – . The DLA will reimburse participants who complete the course and provide proof of registration. If you cannot make this you can attend Petaluma – Saturday Jan 28, 2012 from 9:00a to 4:00p @ Lucchesi Field & Senior Center, 320 N McDowell Blvd, Petaluma, CA 94954. Onsite check-in is @ 8:30a. 2/4/2012 Optional
ALJ/SJP/HCF/avs Date of Issuance 12/6/2018 Decision 18-11-049 November 29, 2018 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking to Conduct a Comprehensive Examination of the California Teleconnect Fund. Rulemaking 13-01-010 DECISION GRANTING INTERVENOR COMPENSATION TO CENTER FOR ACCESSIBLE TECHNOLOGY FOR SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION TO DECISION 18-01-006 Intervenor: Center for Accessible Technology For contribution to Decision (D.) 18-01-006 Claimed: $15,196.25 Awarded: $14,286.25 (6% reduction) Assigned Commissioner: Carla Peterman Assigned ALJs: Sophia Park and Hazlyn Fortune PART I: PROCEDURAL ISSUES A. Brief description of Decision: This decision addresses implementation issues and documentation requirements for the three-year eligibility verification process adopted in Decision 15-07-007 for community-based organizations (CBOs) participating in the California Teleconnect Fund (CTF) program.
Intervenor must satisfy intervenor compensation requirements set forth in Pub. Util. Code §§ 1801-1812: Intervenor CPUC Verified Timely filing of notice of intent to claim compensation (NOI) (§ 1804(a)): 1. Date of Prehearing Conference (PHC): June 19, 2013 Verified. 2. Other specified date for NOI: 30 days after the deadline for filing responsive pleadings (Rule 17.1(a)(2) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure) Verified. 3. Date NOI filed: April 17, 2013 See comment below Verified. Also see the discussion on CforAT’s NOI filing in D.16-03-025 at 4. 4. Was the NOI timely filed? Yes. Showing of eligible customer status (§ 1802(b) or eligible local government entity status (§§ 1802(d), 1802.4): 5. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding number: See comment below. Noted. 6. Date of ALJ ruling: See comment below. Noted. 7. Based on another CPUC determination (specify): D.16-03-025 issued on 3/21/16. See comment below Verified. 8. Has the Intervenor demonstrated customer status or eligible government entity status? Yes, per D.16-03-025. Showing of “significant financial hardship” (§1802(h) or §1803.1(b)) 9. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding number: See comment below Noted. 10. Date of ALJ ruling: See comment below Noted. 11. Based on another CPUC determination (specify): D.16-03-025 issued on 3/21/16. See comment below Verified. 12. 12. Has the Intervenor demonstrated significant financial hardship? Yes, see D.16-03-025.
Process Conditions: FLOW/PACK Filling Time = 0.85 sec Main Material Melt Temperature = 325 °C Mold Wall Temperature = 141 °C Max. Inject (Machine) Pressure = 250 MPa Max. Inject(Machine) Flow Rate = 98 cc/s Flow/Pack Switch Point in Filled Volume = 100 % Pressure Holding Time = 3.51 sec Total Time in Pack Stage = 8.53 sec Auto Filling Time(1: Exist, 0: Not) = 1 Auto Packing Time(1: Exist, 0: Not) = 1 COOL Inlet melt temperature = 325 °C Min. Coolant temperature = 25 °C Air temperature = 30 °C Mould open time = 5 sec Average coolant flow rate = 150 cc/s Control type(1:Eject temp., 2:Cooling time) = 1 Eject temperature(If control type is "1") = 202 °C Cooling time(If control type is "2") = 11.72 sec WARP Ambient Temperature = 30 °C Material Parameters: RESULTS: Filling Time: Pressure At end of fill:
Membership Application Form Student, Ordinary, Associate and Corporate Personal Details: Title (Mr/Mrs etc.): Post-Nominals: Forenames: Surname: Company Name: Mobile : Work Phone: Home Phone: Email Address: Delivery Address: Billing Address (if different): Line 1: Line 1: Line 2: Line 2: Line 3: Line 3: Town: Town: Postcode: Postcode: County: County: Country: Country: How would you best describe your main area of work (select one): Contractor (Arboriculture) Consultant (Arboriculture) Forestry Landscape Horticulture Education Utility Retired Student Local Authority Other If ‘Other’ please specify: Application Details: For information on the benefits open to each grade please check out our website or read our Membership Application leaflet. Grade: Student Ordinary Associate Corporate UK Annual Subscription Charge £10.00 £60.00 £130.00 £310.00 Rest of Europe Annual Subscription Charge (includes postage fees) £35.00 £75.00 £155.00 £345.00 Rest of World Annual Subscription Charge (includes postage fees) £59.35 £86.08 £171.50 £359.72 Optional Extras Please tick and add on any additional fees from the optional extras below: Virtual Utility Membership You will receive regular safety bulletins. Free of Charge Full Utility Membership You will receive meeting minutes and regular safety bulletins, along with invites to various industry consultations and the option to vote for UAG Core Group representatives. £9.00 Our Subscription year runs from January to December each year. Please see below for the percentage of annual subscription charge payable if joining part way through the year. 1 January - 31 March 1 April- 30 June 1 July - 30 September 1 October - 31 December 100% 75% 50% 25% If you wish to upgrade from your current membership grade part way through the year please contact our team at HQ on or call 01242 522152, for more information
actuate a simple device, one that cooperates with other small helium catoms to fulfill a set of unique instructions. Giant Helium Catoms: Provide a larger-than-life, lighter-than-air platform to explore the relation of forces when electrostatics has a greater effect than gravity on a robotic device, an effect simulated with a modular robot designed for self-construction of macro-scale structures. Cubes: Employ electrostatic latches to demonstrate the functionality of a device that could be used in a system of lattice-style self-assembly at both the macro and Each section devoted to an individual hardware project provides an overview of the basic functionality of the device and its relationship to the study of Claytronics. In addition, each project page is paired with a page of design notes that offer more detail on the steps in building the device. As these creative systems have evolved in the Carnegie Mellon-Intel Claytronics Hardware Lab, they have prepared the path for development of a millimeter scale module that will represent the creation of a self-actuating Catom - a device that can compute, move, and communicate - at the Nano-scale. With the millimeter scale modular robot, the Claytronics Hardware Lab will demonstrate the feasibility of manufacturing catoms in the quantities needed to produce dynamic representations of original objects. Millimeter Scale Catoms Realizing high-resolution applications that Claytronics offers requires catoms that are in the order of millimeters. In this work, we propose millimeter-scale catoms that are electrostatically actuated and self contained. As a simplified approach we are trying to build cylindrical catoms instead of spheres.
DEVIATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS MUST BE RETURNED WITH PROPOSAL Offerors shall indicate any and all exceptions taken to the provisions or specification in this solicitation document. Exceptions (mark one): __________ No exceptions __________ Exceptions taken (describe –attach additional pages if needed) The Undersigned hereby acknowledges that there are no deviations/exceptions to this solicitation: Firm Authorized Signature Date
UNCONFIRMED MINUTES OF THE CLOSED MEETING OF THE WELSH AMBULANCE SERVICES NHS TRUST BOARD, HELD ON THURSDAY 28 JANUARY 2016, AT VANTAGE POINT HOUSE CWMBRAN BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Mick Giannasi Tracy Myhill Emrys Davies Professor Kevin Davies Hannah Evans Pam Hall Wendy Herbert Dr Brendan Lloyd James Mycroft Patsy Roseblade David Scott Claire Vaughan Martin Woodford Chairman of the Board Chief Executive Non Executive Director Non Executive Director Director of Planning and Performance (Interim) Non Executive Director Assistant Director of Quality and Nursing Medical Director Non Executive Director Director of Finance and ICT Non Executive Director Director of Workforce and Organisational Development Non Executive Director and Vice Chair TRUST BOARD REPRESENTATIVES: Keith Cox Nigel Heal Estelle Hitchon Nathan Holman Steve Owen Jonathan Whelan Board Secretary Staff Side Representative Director of Partnerships and Engagement Staff Side Representative Corporate Governance Officer Assistant Medical Director (part) APOLOGIES Bleddyn Roberts Staff Side Representative 01/16 PROCEDURAL MATTERS RESOLVED: That the standing declaration of Mr Emrys Davies being a retired member of UNITE be noted. 02/16 SERIOUS ADVERSE INCIDENTS (SAI) AND PRUDiC (Procedural Response to Unexpected Deaths in Children) The report was presented by the Assistant Director of Quality and Nursing who further advised that SAIs were being monitored through the Quality, Patient Experience and Safety Committee. RESOLVED: That the contents of the paper be noted.
Input German (1906-13) American (1910-13) Iron Ore 69.0% 97.0% Fuel 88.0% 65.0% Scrap Metal 95.0% 99.0% Labour 72.0% 170.0% Average Unit Costs 72.0% 90.0% Total Factor Productivity (gains 115.0% 115.0% C. Steel Prices, in Shillings Sterling per Metric Ton: mean of 1906-13 = 100 Steel Product German Domestic German Export American Domestic British Domestic
A. McCloskey on British-American Productivity Differences Steel Product (1907-09) British Advantage American Advantage Heavy Plates 1.57% Rails 8.13% Bars, Rods 7.22% Structural Steel 5.94% Blank Plates, Sheets 1.85% B. German & American Production Costs as percent of British production costs in 1913 Input German (1906-13) American (1910-13) Iron Ore 69.0% 97.0% Fuel 88.0% 65.0% Scrap Metal 95.0% 99.0% Labour 72.0% 170.0% Average Unit Costs 72.0% 90.0%
(Mitchell (Kuznets (Feinstein 1975) 1961) 1976) 1860-9 11.9% 10.0% - 1870-9 12.1% 11.8% 8.9% 1880-9 11.1% 10.9% 8.1% 1890-9 13.6% 10.1% 7.5% 1900-9 14.4% 11.7% 9.5%
Paper 6 Leather and Rubbergoods 6 Timber 5 Quarrying 27 Bricks 132 [all regional cartels] Industrial Employment in Germany in 1913 Chemicals 290,000 Metallurgy 443,000 Coal Mining 728,000 Textiles 1,100,000 Table 10. Comparison of Businessmen in Germany and Great Britain 1890 - 1910: in terms of Science and Education Characteristics of Businessmen Germany Great Britain Attending Schools: Gymnasium/Grammar 59% 30% Businessmen Attending University 24% 13% University Students enrolled 60,000 9,000
Populations 1910 65 million 41 million State Funding of Science and Technology 12.3 million marks 2.0 million marks Businessmen who studied science & technology 61% (very small)? Business Managers with university degrees 65% n.a.? Salaried managers 28% 7% Businessmen who had lived and worked outside country 72% 22% Peerages granted to Businessmen 11% 36% Businessmen with political affiliations 4% 46% Source: Hartmut Berghoff and Roland Möller, ‘Tired Pioneers and Dynamic Newcomers? A Comparative Essay on English and German Entrepreneurial History, 1870 - 1914', Economic History Review, 2nd ser., 47:2 (May 1994), 262-87. Table 11. Components of German Industrialization
Carsten Burhop and Guntram B. Wolff, ‘A Compromise Estimate of German Net National Product, 1815-1913, and Its Implications for Growth and Business Cycles, Journal of Economic History, 65:3 (September 2005), 613-57 Carsten Burhop, ‘Did Banks Cause the German Industrialization?’, Explorations in Economic History, 43:1 (January 2006), 39-63.
Legislative directives Report costs As required in Minnesota Statute 3.197, this document must contain the cost of preparing the report, including any costs incurred by another agency or another level of government. The Minnesota Department of Transportation contracted with CTC & Associates LLC to prepare a synthesis of transportation research on 24-hour headlight use for a fee of $6,200. This Transportation Research Synthesis can be accessed at . Mn/DOT and DPS staff costs are estimated at approximately $7,000. Legislation This report is mandated and submitted pursuant to the Laws of Minnesota 2009, Chapter 168, Section 13. It reports on the findings of state, national and international studies and provides conclusions from the commissioners of the Minnesota Departments of Public Safety and Transportation on mandating drivers to turn on their vehicle lights at all times of day and night. Chapter 168 Section 13 of the session laws of 2009 (H.F. 878) required the commissioners of the Departments of Public Safety and Transportation to perform this study and report the findings to the chairs and ranking minority members of the legislative committees with jurisdiction over transportation policy by January 15, 2011. The study was to include discussions of: Environmental consequences Crash prevention Motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian safety Cost to drivers and Application to motorcycles The complete legislation is included as Appendix A. Americans with Disabilities Act Alternative Format Requests To request this document in an alternative format, call Bruce Lattu at 651-366-4718 or 1-800-657-3774 (Greater Minnesota); 711 or 1-800-627-3529 (Minnesota Relay). You may also send an e-mail to . (Please request at least one week in advance).
COI Self-Disclosure Please disclose COI status and name of company or organization involved with the subject matter of your presentation topic. COI status must be disclosed for the preceding three year from the time of abstract submission. However, concerning items 6 and 7, if clinical fundingor scholarship funds related to the publication of research results are provided by a business, organization or group, to the author, or his/her affiliated department or field, these must also be disclosed. Type Applicable or related COI If yes, list the name(s) of company or organization 1 Consultancy Annual income from a single company or organization, as an officer or consultant, which exceeds an annual total of 1,000,000 yen Author Yes No Spouse etc. Yes No 2 Stock /Stock Options Profit from stocks of one single company or organization which exceeds an annual total of 1,000,000 yen, or 5% or more of total shares of one company/organization Author Yes No Spouse etc. Yes No 3 Patent royalties/licensing fees Patent royalties/licensing fees which exceeds an annual total of1,000,000 yen from a single company or organization Author Yes No Spouse etc. Yes No 4 Remuneration (e.g. lecture fees) Remuneration for attending meetings (presentations), paid for the time and effort of the activity, which exceeds an annual total of 500,000 yen, per company or organization Author Yes No 5 Manuscript fees Manuscript fees for writing of pamphlets etc. , which exceeds an annual total of 500,000 yen per company or organization annually from one commercial entity Author Yes No
6 Research funding Research funds (trust research funds, joint research funds etc.) provided by a single company or organization which exceeds an annual total of 1,000,000 yen Author Yes No 7 Scholarship funds or Donations Scholarship funds granted by a single company or organization which exceeds an annual amount of 1,000,000 yen to the affiliated department or field from one single company or organization Author Yes No 8 Endowed departments by commercial entities (If the individuals disclosing COI is affiliated with an endowed department sponsored by a company or organization) Author Yes No 9 Stock /Stock Options Profit from stocks of one single company or organization which exceeds an annual total of 1,000,000 yen, or 5% or more of total shares of one company/organization Author Yes No Copyrights of your abstract: Please check the box below. I agree that organizing committee publishes abstract in terms of copyright belonging to authors. We cannot issue your abstract without this agreement. Please fill out all required information and send this form to Thank you for your abstract submission.
5 Manuscript fees Manuscript fees for writing of pamphlets etc. , which exceeds an annual total of 500,000 yen per company or organization annually from one commercial entity Author Yes No 6 Research funding Research funds (trust research funds, joint research funds etc.) provided by a single company or organization which exceeds an annual total of 1,000,000 yen Author Yes No 7 Scholarship funds or Donations Scholarship funds granted by a single company or organization which exceeds an annual amount of 1,000,000 yen to the affiliated department or field from one single company or organization Author Yes No 8 Endowed departments by commercial entities (If the individuals disclosing COI is affiliated with an endowed department sponsored by a company or organization) Author Yes No 9 Stock /Stock Options Profit from stocks of one single company or organization which exceeds an annual total of 1,000,000 yen, or 5% or more of total shares of one company/organization Author Yes No Copyrights of your abstract: Please check the box below. I agree that organizing committee publishes abstract in terms of copyright belonging to authors. We cannot issue your abstract without this agreement. Please fill out all required information and send this form to Thank you for your abstract submission.
opt out of default TOU and bill protection. SDG&E also contends that there is no evidence in the record that there exists any significant number of customers who are eligible but not already identified as qualified for an inperson visit prior to disconnection. Based on customer records, SDG&E’s system is able to identify the customers who require an inperson visit prior to disconnection, and therefore, must be excluded from default TOU pursuant to Section 745(c)(1) and D.1203054. SDG&E’s system is able to identify customers on medical baseline and customers that have provided a certification regarding a serious illness or condition. CforAT raises concerns that there may be a population that is eligible for an inperson visit prior to disconnection but is not identified in SDG&E’s system as requiring an inperson visit. The requirements of Section 745(c)(1) apply to “customers that the commission has ordered cannot be disconnected from service without an inperson visit from a utility representative” in D.1203054. We agree with SDG&E that there is a distinction between customers that require an inperson visit pursuant to D.1203054 and customers that may be eligible for an inperson visit. For example, D.1203054 orders that customers on medical baseline shall not be disconnected without an inperson visit but does not impose this same requirement with respect to customers that may be eligible for medical baseline but not enrolled on the program. We find that SDG&E’s plan to identify and exclude the customers identified in D.1203054 as requiring an inperson visit prior to disconnection complies with the mandates in Section 745(c)(1) and we do not find that the halting of default TOU to identify additional customers that may be eligible is warranted. Based on the record of this proceeding, there is no clear indication that there are a large number of customers who may be eligible for an inperson
APPENDIX 3 – Participation Information Statement and Consent Form Participant Information Statement Re-thinking media and sexuality education Principal Investigator Professor Kath Albury, Swinburne University of Technology, Dept. of Media & Communication. The Project: You are invited to take part in a research study. You have been invited because you have previously expressed interest in professional development in the area of sexual health, sexuality education and/or young people’s media practices. To participate in this project you need to meet the following inclusion criteria: A professional educator, health service provider and/or board member of a government or organisation focused on sexual health, sexuality education and/or digital media (aged 18 or older). The research study is aiming to discover how different practical and theoretical approaches to understanding sexuality and the media might build the capacity of policy makers, educators and health promotion workers, youth workers, and other professionals who need to engage with young people’s media practices (such as sexting and selfies) as part of their job. Participation: If you decide to take part in the research we would Invite you to: Participate in a three-hour professional development workshop at [Family Planning Victoria/Alannah and Madeline Foundation address], and Complete two short anonymous surveys immediately before and after the workshop. Benefits: This evidence-based workshop is designed to build your professional capacity to engage with young people’s digital media cultures within your workplace context. The researchers want to learn more about current professional approaches to engaging with youth media practices, with the aim of developing recommendations for policy and practice in this area. This study will inform future and in-service professional development resources. You will be provided with a copy of workshop resources, and a short report based on the project’s findings will be available via Swinburne University of Technology, Alannah and Madeline Foundation and Family Planning Victoria websites (and associated social media accounts) from August 2018. Risks: You may find the workshop is not useful or relevant to your professional role, or your organisation. Taking part in research is voluntary. You may choose not to take part, or you may leave the workshop. If you decide not to take part in this research, your decision will have no effect on your relationship with Swinburne University of Technology, the Alannah and Madeline Foundation or Family Planning Victoria.