Showing of eligible customer status (§ 1802(b) or eligible local government entity status (§§ 1802(d), 1802.4): 5. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding number: R.14-10-010 6. Date of ALJ ruling: 02/03/15 7. Based on another CPUC determination (specify): D.17-09-014 Verified 8. Has the Intervenor demonstrated customer status or eligible government entity status? Yes Showing of “significant financial hardship” (§1802(h) or §1803.1(b)) 9. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding number: R.14-10-010 10. Date of ALJ ruling: 02/03/15 11. Based on another CPUC determination (specify): D.17-09-014 Verified 12. 12. Has the Intervenor demonstrated significant financial hardship? Yes Timely request for compensation (§ 1804(c)): 13. Identify Final Decision: D.18-01-003 Verified 14. Date of issuance of Final Order or Decision: January 17, 2018 Verified 15. File date of compensation request: February 21, 2018 Verified 16. Was the request for compensation timely? Yes PART II: SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION Did the Intervenor substantially contribute to the final decision (see § 1802(j), § 1803(a), 1803.1(a) and D.98-04-059). (For each contribution, support with specific reference to the record.) Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) Specific References to Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) CPUC Discussion Decision D.18-01-003 on Multiple Use Application (MUA) Issues (please note that Attachment 2 includes a list of issue areas, and of GPI Pleadings relevant to this Claim.) Noted 1. Domains, Services and Rules for MUAs. The Staff Proposal on MUAs proposed 20 domains and use Decision Much of the focus and discussion prior to the issuance of the Report focused on enabling a set of specific use cases. Verified
first working group meeting. pg. 22. Pleadings We agree, however, with PG&E’s suggestion that the Commission should establish a working group to further consider these complex issues. [Reply Comments, 6/30, pg. 3.] GPI agrees with an approach that provides more opportunities for dialogue and consideration of various proposals. It is important to create prudent and workable rules and better to “do it right,” even if it requires some additional delay, than to rush rules to completion. [Reply Comments, 6/30, pg. 8.] The PD describes a number of ongoing policy issues to be delegated to a working group that has already been established. GPI supports this decision, as we did in reply comments (p. 3) on the staff proposal. [Comments on PD, 11/28, pg. 5.] 3. Station Power Related Issues. The GPI has consistently supported the development of rules for energy storage projects of all varieties that are simple and understandable, and that contribute to grid stability. With respect to MUAs, we argued for rules for station power that are consistent with single-use storage systems, and with other market participants that utilize similar services. We also pointed out that the concern that storage units would pump energy into Decision Second, storage companies that develop behind-the-meter projects – Stem, AMS and Tesla – all stated in comments on the Report that permitting a non-exporting storage device to charge at wholesale is either not desirable or not a priority issue at this time. GPI also took this position in comments. Given both, we decline to further pursue this matter, but may do so in the future, as and if appropriate. [D.18-01-003, pg. 24.] Pleadings First, we note that this hypothetical is extremely unlikely. The question asks: how do you prevent a customer's Verified
Specific Claim:* Claimed CPUC Award ATTORNEY, EXPERT, AND ADVOCATE FEES Item Year Hours Rate $ Basis for Rate* Total $ Hours Rate $ Total $ G. Morris 2017 10.5 280 2,940.00 10.50 $280.00 $2,940.00 G. Morris 2018 3.0 285 855.00 3.00 $285.00 [B] $855.00 T. Hunt 2017 64.0 385 24,640.00 64.00 $385.00 $24,640.00 T. Hunt 2018 2.5 395 988.00 2.5 $395.00 [C] $987.50 [A] Subtotal: $ 29,423.00 Subtotal: $29,422.50 [D] OTHER FEES Describe here what OTHER HOURLY FEES you are Claiming (paralegal, travel **, etc.): Item Year Hours Rate $ Basis for Rate* Total $ Hours Rate Total $ Hunt, travel 2017 18.0 192.5 ½ rate for 2017 3,465.00 18.00 $192.50 $3,465.00 Subtotal: $ 3,465.00 Subtotal: $3,465.00 INTERVENOR COMPENSATION CLAIM PREPARATION ** Item Year Hours Rate $ Basis for Rate* Total $ Hours Rate Total $ G Morris 2018 15.0 142.5 ½ rate for 2018 2,138.00 15.00 $142.50 $2,137.50 [E] Subtotal: $ 2,138.00 Subtotal: $2,137.50