AC 1.2 Identify potential individual, operational and organisational barriers to using coaching or mentoring and develop appropriate strategies for minimising or overcoming these Potential individual, operational and organisational barriers to using coaching or mentoring are not identified, or are incorrect or inappropriate for an organisational context Appropriate strategies are not developed for minimising or overcoming identified potential barriers, or are incorrect, inappropriate or deficient, or appropriate strategies have been developed for individual barriers or operational barriers or organisational barriers but not all three Potential correct and appropriate individual, operational and organisational barriers to using coaching or mentoring are identified within a narrow organisational context, although why they are potential barriers is imprecise Limited but sufficient correct and appropriate strategies are developed for minimising or overcoming identified potential individual, operational and organisational barriers, although further development of the strategies is required for full implementation Potential correct and appropriate individual, operational and organisational barriers to using coaching or mentoring are precisely identified within a wide organisational context Comprehensive correct and appropriate strategies that require no additional work for full implementation are developed for minimising or overcoming identified potential individual, operational and organisational barriers / 8 (min. of 4) Pass or Referral AC 1.3 Present the case for using coaching or mentoring to benefit individuals and organisation performance Referral [ca. 2/8] Pass [4/8] Good Pass [ca. 6/8] Assessor feedback on AC The case for using coaching or mentoring to benefit individual and organisational performance is not presented, or is incorrect, inappropriate or not proven or the case is presented for benefiting individual or organisational performance but not both The case for using coaching or mentoring is merely stated with no appropriate argument or rationale presented The case does not argue the connection between individual and organisational performance A limited but sufficient correct and appropriate argument or rationale is used to present the case for using coaching or mentoring to benefit individual and organisational performance is presented Relevant but limited argument of the connection between individual and organisational performance A comprehensive correct and appropriate argument or rationale that includes a wide range of organisational and individual implications, resources, success criteria and risks is used to present the case for using coaching or mentoring to benefit individual and organisational performance is presented / 8 (min. of 4) Pass or Referral Section comments (optional): Verification comments (optional):
coaching or mentoring inappropriate or deficient, or the summary does not include how the benefits of coaching should be evaluated mentoring within a limited context are summarised mentoring within a wide context are summarised / 8 (min. of 4) Pass or Referral AC 4.2 Analyse how the benefits of coaching or mentoring should be evaluated Referral [ca. 3/12] Pass [6/12] Good Pass [ca. 9/12] Assessor feedback on AC How the benefits of coaching should be evaluated is incorrect, inappropriate or deficient How the benefits of coaching should be evaluated is merely stated or described with no reference to how an appropriate theory, process or model should be used to provide a solution or conclusion or recommendations How an appropriate theory, process or model should be used to evaluate the benefits of coaching and provide a solution or conclusion or recommendations is correctly and appropriately summarised, although the context and/or scope of the benefits of coaching is limited How an appropriate theory, process or model should be used to evaluate the full scope of the benefits of coaching within a wide context and provide a solution or conclusion or recommendations is correctly and appropriately summarised / 12 (min. of 6) Pass or Referral Section comments (optional): Verification comments (optional): / 100 TOTAL MARKS Assessor’s Decision Quality Assurance Use Outcome (delete as applicable): PASS / REFERRAL Signature of Assessor: Date: Outcome (delete as applicable): PASS / REFERRAL Signature of QA: Date of QA check: