Maryland State Hazard Mitigation Plan Update EMAP Compliance Issue Notes Action #2 4.3.1 The Program did not provide proof of documentation of its assessment of the risk and vulnerability of people of the following hazards: 1. Sea Level Rise 2. Tsunami 3. Nor’Easter 4. Shoreline Erosion 5. Landslide Refer to bolded subsection Consequence Analysis under section 4.6.4.3 Risk Assessment (page 90). Refer to bolded subsection Consequence Analysis under section 4.6.6.7 Risk Assessment (page 109). Refer to bolded subsection Consequence Analysis under section 4.6.7.3 Risk Assessment (page 116). to bolded subsection Consequence Analysis under section 4.6.5.3 Risk Assessment (page 103). Refer to bolded subsection Consequence Analysis under section 4.12.3 Risk Assessment (page 182). Action #3 4.3.1 The Program did not provide proof of documentation of its assessment of the risk and vulnerability of the property of the following hazard: Nor’Easter Refer to bolded subsection State and Critical Facility Risk under section 4.6.7.3 Risk Assessment (page 116). Refer to the tables on page 119. Refer to bolded subsection Consequence Analysis under section 4.6.7.3 Risk Assessment (page 116). Action #4 4.3.1 The Program did not provide proof of documentation of its assessment of the risk and vulnerability of environment of the following hazards: 1. Tsunami 2. Nor’Easter 3. Landslide 4. Dam Failure Refer to bolded subsection Consequence Analysis under section 4.6.6.7 Risk Assessment (page 109). Refer to bolded subsection Consequence Analysis under section 4.6.7.3 Risk Assessment (page 116). Refer to bolded subsection Consequence Analysis under section 4.12.3 Risk Assessment (page 182). Refer to paragraph three of bolded subsection Impact and Vulnerability under section 4.16.1 Risk Assessment (page 230).
to bolded subsection Consequence Analysis under section 4.12.3 Risk Assessment (page 182). Refer to third paragraph under bolded subsection Impact and Vulnerability (page 188). Refer to last sentence of fifth paragraph under bolded subsection Impact and Vulnerability (page 198). Refer to third paragraph under bolded subsection Impact and Vulnerability (page 216). Refer to fifth paragraph under bolded subsection Impact and Vulnerability (page 230). Refer to sixth sentence under section 4.17.2.5 Land subsidence (page 242). Action #9 4.3.2 The Program has not provided proof of documentation of the impact on property, facilities, and infrastructure when a consequence analysis for the following hazards was conducted: 1. Nor’Easter, 2. Tsunami, 3. Drought. Refer to bolded subsection Consequence Analysis under section 4.6.7.3 Risk Assessment (page 116). Refer to bolded subsection Consequence Analysis under section 4.6.6.7 Risk Assessment (page 109). Refer to last sentence of second paragraph under bolded subsection Impact and Vulnerability (page 198). Action #10 4.3.2 The Program has not provided documentation of the impact on the environment was considered when a consequence analysis for the following hazards was conducted: 1. Nor’Easter, 2. Sea level rise, 3. Tsunami, 4. Landslide, 5. Dam Failure. Refer to bolded subsection Consequence Analysis under section 4.6.7.3 Risk Assessment (page 116). Refer to bolded subsection Consequence Analysis under section 4.6.4.3 Risk Assessment (page 90). to bolded subsection Consequence Analysis under section 4.6.6.7 Risk Assessment (page 109). Refer to bolded subsection Consequence Analysis under section 4.12.3 Risk Assessment (page 182). Refer to third paragraph under bolded subsection Impact and Vulnerability (page 230). Action #11 4.3.2 The Program has not considered the impact on the economic condition of the jurisdiction and public confidence in the jurisdiction’s governance when a to bolded subsection Consequence Analysis under section 4.6.7.3 Risk Assessment (page 116).