zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Standard Specifications / Techniques Used Type of Tests / Properties Measured / Material / Products Tested pH Meter Manufacturer Thermo Scientific Model Orion2Star S.N B 31743 SM 4500 H+ B:2012 Determination of pH value Drinking Water Turbidity Meter Manufacturer Model 2100 N S.N 07110C023111 SM 2130 B: 2012 Determination of Turbidity Wet Chemistry SM 4500Cl B: 2012 Determination of chlorides Wet Chemistry SM 2340 C: 2012 Determination of total hardness Wet Chemistry SM 3500 Ca B: 2012 Determination of calcium hardness Gas Chromatography Manufacturer Varian, Model Varian3800/3380 S.N 105214 EPA 551.1:1990 EPA 501.2:1979 Detrmination of chloroform Determination of bromform Determination of bromodichloromethane Determination of dibromochloromethane
Standard Specifications / Techniques Used Type of Tests / Properties Measured / Material / Products Tested Determination of Metals Drinking Water Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy Manufacturer Varian, Austrila Model AA240FS S.N El 08023462 SM 3111B: 2012 LOQ (mg/l) Metals 0.0357 Zinc (Zn) 0.0771 Copper (Cu) 0.0558 Iron (Fe) 0.0579 Manganese (Mn) Spectrophtometer Manufacturer Aquarius Model CE7400s S.N 146454 SM 3500 Al B: 2012 0.0276 Determination of Aluminum SM 4500 Detrmination of S as SO4-- Membrane Filter Model Sartorius B10019E S.N 58040004 Autoclave Model VWR Prioclave Psiocsiev100 S.N 2737 Incubator Manufacturer LTE Scientific LTD BITAN Model IP 100 S.N K10695/1 Colony Counter Model VWR Stuart- UK S.N R000103107 SM 9222 B:2012 Total coliforms count – Memberane filter technique Drinking Water
As required by D.03-12-035, the Stewardship Council prepared a Land Conservation Plan (LCP) to establish a framework for the conservation and/or enhancement of the Watershed Lands, and to ensure the permanent protection of these lands for the benefit of current and future Californians. To address the challenge of a conservation effort of this large scope, and to facilitate engagement of a wide range of stakeholders and interested members of the public, the Stewardship Council grouped the Watershed Lands into 47 planning units and established a phased approach to development and implementation of the LCP. In 2007, the Stewardship Council Board adopted Volumes I and II of the LCP: Volume I: The Land Conservation Framework establishes the overall framework for the LCP, including legal requirements, the planning process, methodologies, public involvement, and relevant regulatory processes. Volume II: Planning unit Concepts documents existing conditions and presents management objectives, potential measures, and conceptual plans to preserve and/or enhance the Beneficial Public Values (BPVs) within each planning unit. The management objectives for the Willow Creek Property are: Preserve and protect habitat for plants, trees and wildlife that are native to the area, including species protected under the California Endangered Species Act. The term “habitat” includes vegetation along banks and shorelines that contribute to maintaining watershed health. The term “native” refers to plant and animals that occur naturally on the Property, and are defined as “native” by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and its successors. Protect forest resources on the property. Forest resources consist of Sierra Nevada oak woodland and annual grassland forest type and riparian vegetation that provide habitat for wildlife and fisheries. Outdoor recreation such as fishing and hiking. Preserve the scenic viewshed of the Property in keeping with the surrounding environment, providing a forested landscape and open grassland, as well as views of the waterbodies on the Property.
Contact: Please RSVP with Neda Oreizy at . California Teleconnect Fund Qualifying Services Workshop April 9, 2018 10 am – 5 pm California Public Utilities Commission – Courtyard Room San Francisco CA 94102 Webcast Information: Conference Phone Line: (800) 603-7556 Participant Passcode: 748 512 232 Contact: More Information is available at: Small/Diverse Business Expo and Matchmaking Fair April 25, 2018 7:30 am – 1:30 pm The Grand Long Beach 4101 E. Willow Street Long Beach, CA 90815 More information is available at: NEW PROCEEDINGS NONE PETITIONS FOR MODIFICATION AND APPLICATIONS FOR REHEARING NONE DRAFT RESOLUTIONS (Issued for public comment. Comments are governed by Rule 14.5.) Resolution No. ALJ - 351 Voting Meeting Agenda Date: March 22, 2018 Subject Matter Resolves K.17-11-012, the Appeal of London Rose Tours LLC from Citation F-5380 issued on October 31, 2017 by the Transportation Enforcement Section of the Consumer Protection and Enforcement Division Web Link Comments due: Opening Comments shall be served no later than March 5, 2018, and reply comments shall be served no later than March 12, 2018
development actions will be complemented by world class initiatives to promote the visual and performing arts, undertaken in partnership with leading artists, architects and institutions from all regions. The Creative Cities Network will be further developed to better capitalize on cities and local governments as major partners for promoting sustainable development through international cooperation between cities of developed and developing countries. In this regard, the Network will continue to explore the challenges of rapid global urbanization and urban renewal and further promote cities as hubs of creativity and innovation. Emphasis will be given to the growth of the network, in numbers of cities and quality of exchanges by offering leverage for stronger interaction between stakeholders: private and public sectors, decision makers and civil society, in particular in developing countries and Africa. Programmes will be developed jointly with the cities for poverty alleviation and improved social balance between communities. EXPECTED RESULTS National capacities strengthened to safeguard the intangible cultural heritage, including indigenous and endangered languages, through the effective implementation of the 2003 Convention Performance indicators Benchmarks Governing bodies of the 2003 Convention supported through the effective organization of their statutory meetings General Assembly [2], Committee [4] and Advisory Bodies meetings organized National policies and human and institutional resources for intangible cultural heritage developed and/or strengthened Policies developed or revised in 30 States and human and institutional resources strengthened in 50 States 2 regions pilot the integrated heritage education programme developed (in collaboration with ERs 1,2,3 and 4) (extrabudgetary) Number of safeguarding plans developed and/or implemented 200 plans developed and/or implemented Number of international assistance requests processed and effectively implemented, nominations processed and best practices promoted 50 international assistance requests processed and 30 projects implemented 180 nominations and 5 best practices Number of periodic reports on the implementation of the Convention at the national levels provided by Parties analysed and monitored 100 reports, of which 50 address gender issues Number of States Parties to the Convention increased 15 new States Parties Number of organizations within and outside the United Nations system, civil society, and the private sector contributing to programme delivery. 100 NGOs accredited or renewed At least 7 category 2 centres fulfilling their mandates Knowledge produced by all stakeholders involved in the implementation of the Convention available through the system At least 200 stakeholders contributing 100% increase of number of pages dedicated to capacity-building and policy benchmarking
March 12, 2018 10:30 am – 4 pm California Public Utilities Commission – Golden Gate Room San Francisco, CA 94102 Webcast information: Meeting number (access code): 625 317 530 Participant call in: 1-510-338-9438 Participant Code: 625 317 530 Contact: Whitney Richardson at or 415-703-2108 Public Workshop Notice: A.17-09-006 – Application of Pacific Gas and Electric Company to Revise its Gas Rates and Tariffs to be Effective October 1, 2018 March 14, 2018 10 am – 2 pm California Public Utilities Commission – Auditorium San Francisco, CA 94102 Contact: Carlos Velasquez, Public Workshop Notice: R.12-10-012 & R.15-03-010 - California Advance Services Fund Public Forum March 14, 2018 10 am – 4 pm Oroville Council Chambers 1735 Montgomery St. Oroville CA 95965 Public Workshop Notice: R.12-10-012 & R.15-03-010 - California Advance Services Fund Public Forum March 16, 2018 10 am – 4 pm Madera Council Chambers 205 W. 4th Street Madera CA 93637 Public Webinar Notice: EM&V Stakeholder Quarterly Meeting March 20, 2018 10am – 1pm Webcast Information: : Meeting number 716-466-284 Passcode: !Energy1 Participant call in: 866-628-9540 Participant Passcode: 1637171 Contact:
Condition B of the Mariposa Settlement Agreement (“Settlement”). The Commission had previously found that PG&E filed three applications to meet its resource need under the 2008 Long-Term Request for Offers (“LTRFO”) when it had agreed to file only one pursuant to the Settlement.” D.17-10-024, p. 1. Verified Duplication of Effort (§ 1801.3(f) and § 1802.5): Intervenor’s Assertion CPUC Discussion a. Was the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA) a party to the proceeding? Yes (it was DRA at the time.) Yes b. Were there other parties to the proceeding with positions similar to yours? Yes. Yes c. If so, provide name of other parties: CBE was closely aligned with CARE in this proceeding. CBE also communicated with DRA. Noted d. Intervenor’s claim of non-duplication: CBE coordinated with CARE regarding remedy theories, and provided a legal analysis. CBE’s work was not duplicative of CARE’s or any other party. Noted Additional Comments on Part II: # Intervenor’s Comment CPUC Discussion As a result of CBE advocacy around need for a remedy regarding breach, the Commission engaged in a penalty phase, ordering PG&E to pay $25,000. D.17-10-024 finally concluded this phase of the proceeding. Noted PART III: REASONABLENESS OF REQUESTED COMPENSATION General Claim of Reasonableness (§ 1801 and § 1806): a. Intervenor’s claim of cost reasonableness: CBE intervened in Phase II of the proceeding for the narrow purposes of ensuring that PG&E face penalties if it violates its settlement agreements, and that the Commission not allow PG&E to overprocure gas-fired generation outside the long procurement process. CBE was successful in achieving these purposes. The compensation request is extremely CPUC Discussion Verified
this new renewal method may be applicable, e.g., the most impacted zip codes by the fires to target and the necessary conditions to receive a participant’s consent to complete, sign, and submit the renewal form on his/her behalf; and b) to notify stakeholders, CAB, and the Administrator accordingly. Lastly, we require the Administrator to conduct an outbound call campaign to California LifeLine participants impacted by the October and December 2017 wildfires. This call campaign should facilitate the use of the new renewal method, “Renewals by CAB and the Administrator Call Center Staff.” We direct CD to determine the scope of this outbound call campaign, e.g., start date, end date, script, and the most impacted zip codes by the fires to target. CD, CAB, and the Administrator should implement these outreach efforts as soon as possible. These outreach efforts can make it easier for California LifeLine participants to keep their California LifeLine discounts. General Compliance with other State statutes and applicable regulations SCE, SoCalGas, and SDG&E, and communications companies are directed to ensure compliance with existing statutes, regulations, ordinances and work in cooperation with the California Department of Fire, the Office of Emergency Services, and other appropriate California, federal, and local government agencies. COMMENTS Public Utilities Code section 311(g)(1) provides that this Resolution must be served on all parties and subject to at least 30 days public review and comment prior to a vote of the Commission. Section 311(g)(2) provides that this 30-day period may be reduced or waived ”in an unforeseen emergency … .” The Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure also provides that public review and comment may be waived or reduced in an “unforeseen emergency situation” specifically where there are “[a]ctivities that severely impair or threaten to severely impair public health or safety…” (Rule 14.6(a)(1) and/or where there are “[c]rippling disasters that severely impair public health or safety.” (Rule 14.6(a)(2)). The 30-day comment period is waived pursuant to these authorities due to the extraordinary nature of these disasters. However, in order to better disseminate the directives in this resolution it was served on the service lists of the last General Rate Cases for the energy utilities. Interested persons are welcome to monitor the forthcoming advice letter processes.
and annual reports were considered as a source of conflict that caused delays and deteriorated professional relationships [p. 32, TE]. 4.4 Sustainability Rating: Moderately Likely The TE rates sustainability as moderately likely. This TER rates sustainability as moderately likely. The national government demonstrated financial commitment in the project’s continuation. Social support appears to be high as demonstrated already in producers’ behavioral change towards biodiversity-friendly approaches. CIARA expressed commitment for continuing to implement the project’s second phase by including the replication sites. However, no other possible financial sources or different institutions other than CIARA were found to support the project’s continuity. Risks to the sustainability of project outcomes is further assessed along the following 4 dimensions [p. TE]: Financial Sustainability. (Moderately Likely) The TE identifies commitment by the government to continue implementing the program with its own resources [p. 43, TE]. No other sources of revenue supporting the project were found. Sociopolitical Sustainability. (Likely) Behavioral change towards a more agro-ecological approach in producers was registered throughout the project [p. 43-44, TE]. Their new technical skills that support this approach may support a positive long-term impact. Further buttressing this type of sustainability, production of shade-grown coffee has a great sustainability potential is that it is in line with farmers’ cultural element. The project is largely supported by local beneficiaries that could be used as leverage for future endeavors. Institutional Sustainability. (Moderately Likely) MPPAT (People’s Ministry for Agriculture and Land) and CIARA’s Board signaled commitment to continue the program into a second phase, which would bring together current beneficiaries such as those in Terrandina with future beneficiaries in the original “replication” component (13 municipalities) [p. 42, TE]. However, involvement by other local offices and ministries was limited [p. 26, TE]. This lack of support could work against the project’s sustainability. Environmental Sustainability. (Unable to Assess) Possible environmental risks are related to the coffee borer pest and blight that can serve as a possible backlash to non-environmental friendly practices. However, because probability of this happening is not provided. institutional
SECTION 15: PRACTICE AND CONTESTS STARTING DATES During the Association year, practice in a sport shall not be held after the conclusion of a school's sport season in that sport as defined in OSAA Rule 6.1.6. 2016-2017 First Practice First Contest Fall Sports August 15 August 25 (Football: Sept. 2) Winter Sports November 14 November 30 Spring Sports February 27 March 13 Section 16: Administration/Coaches Directory Principal Andy Van Fleet Associate Principal Amber Fields Associate Principal Angelita Miller Activities Director Mackenzie Coulson Athletic Trainer Travis Johannes Baseball Tom Campbell Basketball – Boys Shawn Alderman Basketball – Girls Steve Naylor Cheer Kendra DeLaughter Cross Country Holly Paris Dance (Tigerettes) Linda Sheron Football Craig Ruecker Golf – Boys John Gailey Golf – Girls Mindy Yarnell Soccer – Boys Angelo Simonetti Soccer – Girls Paul Slover Softball Open Swimming John Ruzicka Tennis – Boys Jack Cullen Tennis – Girls Matt Rubrecht Track Shane Kessler Volleyball Rob Coelho Water Polo John Ruzicka Wrestling Geoff Jarman
Public Workshop Notice: R.12-10-012 & R.15-03-010 - California Advance Services Fund Public Forum March 16, 2018 10 am – 4 pm Madera Council Chambers 205 W. 4th Street Madera CA 93637 For more information contact: Public Advisor Office at 866-849-8390 or email Public Webinar Notice: EM&V Stakeholder Quarterly Meeting March 20, 2018 10am – 1pm Webinar Information: Webinar number 716-466-284 Webinar access code: !Energy1 Participant call in: 866-628-9540 Participant Passcode: 1637171 Contact: Public Meeting Notice: Customer Data Access Committee (CDAC) March 22, 2018 10am – 3pm PG&E General Offices – Conference Room 1876 77 Beale Street San Francisco CA 94102 Webcast Information: Participant call in: (800) 603-7556 Participant passcode: 748 512 232 Contact: Please RSVP with Neda Oreizy at . Public Meeting Notice: Telecommunications Access for the Deaf and Disabled Administrative Committee (TADDAC) March 23, 2018 10 am – 4 pm DDTP Headquarters 1333 Broadway, Suite 500 Oakland, CA 94612 Contact: Reina Vazquez at or at 510-302-1147 More info:
I address the requirements of in Attachment B of the instant pleading. Duplication of Effort (§ 1801.3(f) and § 1802.5): Intervenor’s Assertion CPUC Discussion a. Was the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA) a party to the proceeding? Yes Yes b. Were there other parties to the proceeding with positions similar to yours? Yes Yes c. If so, provide name of other parties: ORA and TURN Verified d. Intervenor’s claim of non-duplication: Reid collaborated with a number of PRG members during the period January 8, 2015 to June 5, 2016. Reid had private meetings or teleconferences with the following individuals: Michael Yeo of ORA; Marcel Howiger of TURN; Independent Evaluators Lewis Hashimoto and Wayne Oliver; Kevin Woodruff, consultant for TURN; and ORA attorney Cheryl Lee of the Energy Division. Although Reid does not seek compensation for all of these communications, they indicate reasonable collaboration with other PRG members. Verified PART III: REASONABLENESS OF REQUESTED COMPENSATION General Claim of Reasonableness (§ 1801 and § 1806): a. Concise explanation as to how the cost of Claimant’s participation bears a reasonable relationship with benefits realized through participation (include references to record, where appropriate) My participation in PG&E’s PRG allowed me to identify issues in advance of an application and to focus on disputed cases that I believed were the highest priority for ratepayers. Ratepayers benefited because I was able to resolve many issues in the PRG process, thereby reducing the amount of protracted and expensive litigation. San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E) has pointed out: (R.06-02-013, Reply Comments of San Diego Gas & Electric Company On Pro-posed Decision Regarding Intervenor Compensation Related to Procurement Review Groups, Peer Review Groups and Public Advisory Groups, June 25, 2007, p. 2.) “Although the PRGs and PAGs are advisory in nature, they have greatly CPUC Discussion Verified
APPENDIX Compensation Decision Summary Information Compensation Decision: D1803029 Modifies Decision? No Contribution Decision: D1606042 Proceeding: R1312010 Author: ALJ Fitch Payer: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Intervenor Information Intervenor Claim Date Amount Requested Amount Awarded Multiplier? Reason Change/Disallowance L. Jan Reid 8/22/2016 $18,355.75 $16,600.75 N/A Only 11.2 hours reported for 2016. Advocate Information First Name Last Name Type Intervenor Hourly Fee Requested Year Hourly Fee Requested Hourly Fee Adopted L. Jan Reid Expert L. Jan Reid $220 2015 $220 L. Jan Reid Expert L. Jan Reid $225 2016 $225 (END OF APPENDIX)
APPENDIX Compensation Decision Summary Information Compensation Decision: Modifies Decision? No Contribution Decisions: D1310058; D1412090 Proceeding: C1209002 Author: ALJ Division Payer: Southern California Edison Company Intervenor Information Intervenor Claim Date Amount Requested Amount Awarded Multiplier? Reason Change/ Disallowance Acton Town Council January 09, 2015 $33,290.00 $15,540.00 N/A Non-substantial contributions; of hours to claim preparation Advocate Information First Name Last Name Type Intervenor Hourly Fee Requested Year Hourly Fee Requested Hourly Fee Adopted Jacqueline Ayer Expert Acton Town Council $135.00 2012 $130.00 Jacqueline Ayer Expert Acton Town Council $135.00 2013 $135.00 Elizabeth Harris Attorney Acton Town Council $155.00 2013 $160.00 Katherine Tucker Advocate Acton Town Council $85.00 2012 $85.00 Katherine Tucker Advocate Acton Town Council $85.00 2013 $90.00 (END OF APPENDIX)
Check all pest management used in your storage areas. Preventative: Good sanitation Removal of exterior habitat / food Clean up spilled product Sealed doors and/or windows Physical barriers Screened windows/vents Monitoring Incoming product inspection Other (please specify): Mechanical: Mechanical traps Ultrasound/light devices Sticky traps Electrocutors Freezing treatments Heat treatments Other (please specify): Pest Control Materials – On the National List Pheromone traps Vitamin baits Diatomaceous earth Pyrethrum Boric acid Pest Control Materials – Not on the National List Crack and crevice spray Exterior Bait Stations Fumigation Fogging Other (please specify): Are synthetic pest control substances or other synthetic materials used in storage facilities where organic or transitional crops are stored? Yes No If yes, explain how organic products and packaging are protected from exposure to the synthetic materials. Tip! The use, frequency, and method of application of synthetic substances must be approved prior to use. Records regarding pest control strategies must be available for review during annual inspections.
SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS:  This decision does not order any action related to safety. ESTIMATED COST:  $10 million per year for the Disadvantaged Communities – Single- family Solar Home program, and an undetermined amount for discounted Green Tariff and Community Solar programs in disadvantaged communities. (Comr Guzman Aceves) 6 Pub. Util. Code § 311 – This item was mailed for Public Comment. Pub. Util. Code §1701.1 -- This proceeding is categorized as Ratesetting. This matter may be considered during the Ratesetting Deliberative Meeting. The continuation Ratesetting Deliberative Meeting will be held at the California Public Utilities Commission, 505 Van Ness Avenue, Room 5305, San Francisco, California 94102.
Belmont Cricket Festival 2013 – Pitch and Facilities Layout Pitch 3 – Out of Action Resurfacing Pitch 2 Pitch 1 Pavilion Forest Road → Belmont Cricket Festival Saturday 8th June 9:00am-12:30pm Competing Schools Belmont Lincroft St Johns Northwood
modified or augmented to ensure the availability of well-defined and consistent post-disaster protections in emergency situations. Background and Procedural History Autumn 2017 will be remembered for the terrible wildfires that devastated numerous communities in Northern and Southern California. On October 8, 2017, multiple fires broke out throughout Northern California. In less than 24 hours, more than 18 fires began burning in at least seven counties. By the time the fires were contained two weeks later, more than 200,000 acres of land were devastated and dozens of lives were lost. The fires damaged utility infrastructure providing electricity, communications, water, and gas service to thousands of Californians. On October 9 and 10, 2017, Governor Brown declared states of emergency in the Counties of Butte, Lake, Mendocino, Napa, Nevada, Orange, Solano, Sonoma, and Yuba. On October 9, 2017, the Canyon Fire began burning in Southern California, resulting in additional evacuations and damage to utility infrastructure. On October 24, 2017, The Utility Reform Network submitted a letter to the Commissioners and Executive Director requesting that the Commission take actions to assist the wildfire victims, including: (1) Waiver of deposits to establish service and expediting move-ins and move-outs; (2) Suspension of disconnection for non-payment and associated fees; (3) Suspension of deposits to re-establish credit and late fees; (4) Offer payment plans for customers affected by the wildfire disaster who have prior arrearages, or who indicate inability to
The table below delineates how the California LifeLine Administrator (Administrator) will determine which participants will be subject to the Renewal Process: GROUP A GROUP B GROUP C ACTION: OVERTURN DENIAL & INCLUDE IN CATCH-UP RENEWAL PROCESS ACTION: INCLUDE IN CATCH-UP RENEWAL PROCESS ACTION: EXCLUDE FROM CATCH-UP RENEWAL PROCESS Administrator already communicated the final denial due to to the renewing participant Administrator has begun the renewal process, but has yet to communicate the final eligibility decision to the renewing participant Administrator already communicated the final approval to the renewing participant Administrator already communicated the final denial due to to the renewing participant, but the consumer is subsequently attempting to enroll in the program (Administrator will conduct an intra-carrier or inter-carrier transfer, as applicable, if the application request is still pending) Administrator has not begun the renewal process, but is scheduled to occur before February 1, 2018 Administrator has begun the renewal process, but has yet to communicate the final approval to the renewing participant Administrator already communicated the final denial due to to the renewing participant, but subsequently enrolled in the program
06/25/18 10:00 a.m. ALJ Ayoade ALJ Roscow Comr Rechtschaffen A.17-09-006 (EH) - Application of Pacific Gas and Electric Company to Revise its Gas Rates and Tariffs to be Effective October 1, 2018.(U39G), Commission Courtroom, San Francisco (Also June 26 – 29) 07/09/18 10:00 a.m. ALJ Cooke Comr Peterman A.17-06-030 (EH) - Application of Southern California Edison Company (U338E) to Establish Marginal Costs, Allocate Revenues, and Design Rates, Commission Courtroom, San Francisco 07/09/18 10:00 a.m. ALJ Lirag Comr Picker A.17-10-007 (EH) - Application of San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U902M) for Authority, Among Other Things, to Update its Electric and Gas Revenue Requirement and Base Rates Effective on January 1, 2019, Commission Courtroom, San Francisco (Also July 10 – August 10 and August 28) 07/18/18 6:00 p.m. ALJ Houck Comr Picker I.12-10-013 (PPH) – Order Instituting Investigation on the Commission’s Own Motion into the Rates, Operations, Practices, Services and Facilities of Southern California Edison Company and San Diego Gas and Electric Company Associated with the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 and 3, And Related Matters: A.13-01-016 A.13-03-005 A.13-03-013 A.13-03-014 Costa Mesa, CA (Location TBD) PUBLIC MEETINGS & WORKSHOP NOTICES Public Meeting Notice: Customer Data Access Committee (CDAC) March 22, 2018 10am – 3pm PG&E General Offices – Conference Room 1876 77 Beale Street San Francisco CA 94102 Webcast Information: Participant call in: (800) 603-7556 Participant Passcode: 748 512 232 Contact: Please RSVP with Neda Oreizy at . Public Meeting Notice: Telecommunications Access for the Deaf and Disabled Administrative Committee (TADDAC) March 23, 2018 10 am – 4 pm DDTP Headquarters 1333 Broadway, Suite 500 Oakland, CA 94612
Public Webinar Notice: R.16-02-007– IRP Modeling Advisory Group Webinar March 29, 2018 10 am – 12 pm Webinar information: Participant Call in: (712) 775-7031 Participant Passcode: 349332 Contact: Forest Kaser at or (415) 703-1445 or Patrick Young at or (415) 703-5357. Public Workshop Notice: R.12-10-012 & R.15-03-010 – California Advanced Services Fund Public Forum/Workshop. March 30, 2018 10 am – 4 pm Ronald Reagan Administrative Building 300 S. Spring Street Los Angeles CA 90013 For more information: Public Meeting Notice: CPUC and Energy Commission Convene Disadvantaged Communities Advisory Group April 4, 2018 10am- 3:30 pm California Energy Commission – Art Rosenfeld Hearing Room 1516 Ninth Street, 1st Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 Webcast information: . Public Meeting Notice: California Teleconnect Fund Qualifying Services April 9, 2018 10 am – 5 pm Commission Headquarters – Courtyard Room San Francisco CA 94102 Conference Phone Line: (800) 603-7556 Participant Passcode: 748 512 232 Contact: For more information: Public Workshop Notice: R.12-06-013 Marketing Education and Outreach (ME&O) Working Group April 10, 2018 10:30 am – 4 pm Commission Headquarters– Courtyard San Francisco, CA 94102 Webcast information: Meeting access code: 627 016 258
LCE’s Responses: LCE rejects the assertion by SoCalREN and SCE that they are required to engage in the CAEECC process and SCE’s assertion that the funding should be coordinated with the timing of SCE’s Business Plan approval. LCE claims that to engage in this resource intensive process is unnecessary for an initial filing to elect to administer EE their EE plan. They add that Senate Bill 790 modified Section 381.1 to provide CCAs a simpler route to elect to administer EE programs, in which a Tier 3 AL was sufficient and thus do not need to file an application or participate in CAEECC. LCE adds that despite their decision to pursue the elect to administer option, LCE recognizes the value of stakeholder input and solicited input from SCE, SoCalREN and ORA. In response to SCE’s assertion that LCE should update their hard to reach net-to -gross to align with SCE’s EM&V definition for small business as business that use under 20 kW or less monthly, LCE responds that SCE and other program administrators also offer direct installation services for businesses using under 200 kW monthly. LCE adds that they intend to target small businesses under 20 kW monthly, but will set the upper limit to 200 kW. LCE claims the net-to-gross values used in their cost effectiveness input file were derived from approved workpapers or from the Database for Energy Efficiency Resources and are aligned with current industry standards for direct install for small commercial measures. In response to SCE’s assertion that LCE should develop labor and material costs for their Small Commercial Direct Install program rather than use SCE’s estimates, LCE states that new and non-IOU program administrators are at a distinct disadvantage for gaining useful data to inform these calculations. However, LCE expects to be able to develop such estimates subsequent to running the program. LCE claims that SoCalREN, while not providing discussion related to LCE AL 5-E, appears to advocate for a new proceeding. LCE responds that they are following an existing process from D.14-01-033 and that any consideration of further rulemaking is immaterial to the certification of LCE’s plan. Finally, SoCalREN provided comments on successful CCA growth models without any discussion of LCE, from which one might infer that LCE may not be operating with long term
California Public Utilities Commission _________________________________________________________________________________ FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE PRESS RELEASE Media Contact: Terrie Prosper, 415.703.1366, CPUC TO EVALUATE ADOPTION OF POST-DISASTER CONSUMER PROTECTION MEASURES SAN FRANCISCO, March 22, 2018 - The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) today said it will evaluate adoption of comprehensive post-disaster consumer protection measures for all utilities under its jurisdiction. In November 2017 and January 2018, and consistent with the Governor’s declaration of a state of emergency in several counties, the CPUC ordered utilities to take reasonable and necessary steps to assist Californians affected by a series of devastating wildfires in Northern and Southern California. The protections adopted were designed to ensure that Californians who experienced housing or financial crises due to the wildfires did not lose access to vital utility services. The CPUC will seek comments on whether to adopt the emergency consumer protections that were ordered in and for use by all utilities in the event of disasters in which the Governor issues a state of emergency proclamation. In addition, the CPUC may also consider whether those consumer protections, if adopted, should be modified or augmented to ensure the availability of well-defined and consistent post-disaster protections in emergency situations. The proposal voted on is available at: . The CPUC regulates services and utilities, safeguards the environment, and assures Californians’ access to safe and reliable utility infrastructure and services. For more information on the CPUC, please visit . ###
Cypress Run Education Center SCHOOL ADVISORY COUNCIL (SAC) Meeting Minutes April 10, 2018 at 4:00pm Dr. Belter called the meeting to order at 4:00 pm welcoming everyone. The meeting started with introductions and approval of the previous SAC meeting minutes, which were approved. Ms. Graham asked for exact money amount of remaining funds that Dr. Harrigan wants to use for “Lunch and Learn.” Ms. Graham would also like to the deadline for the use of money awarded to teams. High school team used most of their money to provide work boots for students who are doing their internship at City of Pompano Beach. SIP members are presently working on PBIS. Dr. Belter adjourned the SAC meeting at 4:40 pm. Respectfully submitted, Margareta Swider BTU Steward
September 14, 2016 at 4:00pm School Advisory Committee Notes Present: Janet Jackson Dean Belter Sharon Graham Shayla McCloud Courtney Davis Olga Wilson Margareta Swider • Notes from the last meeting were reviewed and approved. • SAC meeting dates approved. • By-Laws presented. • Upcoming Election was organized; Ms. Graham and Mrs. Swider will collect the votes by Friday, September 16, 2016. • Mr. Harrigan will provide us with the amount of money available for SAC to use this school year. • Brief discussion took a place about managing SAC funds in such a way that we have money available entire school year and for money to be divided equally amongst all teams. • Meeting was adjourned at 5:30 pm.
IDENTIFYING KEY COUNTRIES IN GLOBAL PRODUCTION NETWORKS THROUGH INTERCENTRALITY MEASURES Luis ORTEGA-SEGURA Roberto C. OROZCO Cinthia MÁRQUEZ-MORANCHEL Abstract In this paper we used a set of measures of "centrality groups" to identify groups of countries which are the key actors of global production networks. These measures take into account the global and regional nature of international production processes and are derived from Social Networks Analysis (SNA). The information framework for these purposes are the input-output matrices of the countries considered in the WIOD. Traditional measures in the SNA to find the key actors (in our case, countries) start to see an actor within the network as a single entity and through its relation to all the other countries in the network. Recently there have been measures named “centrality of groups" and it has been shown that a measure of centrality that makes a particular player qualify is not equal to the measure obtained, for the same player, derived from a group to whom the player belongs in the same network. Identifying actors that are the most important individuals in a network is different from selecting a set of actors that are, as a group, the key players. Thus, the role of an actor individually can be very different from its role in a subset of actors of the entire network. In our case, this measure (called intercentrality) tries to identify the contribution of a group of countries in the cohesion of the global production network, so their cohesion implies strategic complementarities among countries. Moreover, within the context of the World-System approach, countries may be sorted hierarchically or classified according to a series of characteristics (economic, social, political and cultural) into three regions: core, semi-periphery and periphery. However, there is still the problem of clearly defining inclusion in any of those regions of countries when considered individually, through economic indicators such as output, income or trade. In this exercise, we investigated the relevance of using an extended centrality index that includes groups of countries to define their inclusion on each of the regions proposed by the World-Economy approach, taking into account the global production network (40 countries), both in terms of gross value and value added. Keywords: input-output, key player, centrality, intercentrality,
Reid also requests an hourly rate for L. Jan Reid of $107.50 for time, and $110.00 for 2014-2015 compensatory time. As discussed in Part III.B, the Commission set Reid’s hourly rate at $215 for 2013 professional work. The Commission has ordered that “For work performed in the 2014 calendar year, intervenors are authorized a 2.58 percent cost-of-living adjustment.” (Resolution ALJ-303, Ordering Paragraph 1, slip op. at 9.) The Commission had previously set Reid’s hourly rate for 2013 work at $215/hr. (See D14-12-072, Appendix). 2.58% of $215 is $5.57, which rounds to a rate increase of $5/hr. for 2014 and 2015 work. Thus, Reid’s hourly rate for 2014 and 2015 work should be set at $220/hr. (215 + 5 =220). D. CPUC Disallowances and Adjustments: Item Reason [1] The Commission approves a rate of $220 per hour for L. Jan Reid’s 2014 work. PART IV: OPPOSITIONS AND COMMENTS A. Opposition: Did any party oppose the Claim? No B. Comment Period: Was the 30-day comment period waived (see Rule 14.6(c)(6))? Yes FINDINGS OF FACT L. Jan Reid has made a substantial contribution to D.14-11-027. The requested hourly rate for L. Jan Reid is comparable to market rates paid to experts and advocates having comparable training and experience and offering similar services. The claimed costs and expenses are reasonable and commensurate with the work performed. The total of reasonable compensation is $20,607.00. CONCLUSION OF LAW
Resolution No. T-17599 Voting Meeting Agenda Date April 26, 2018 Subject Matter Resolution T-17599 denies granting Conifer Communications Inc.’s Application for Modification of Resolution T-17502 for the underserved rural communities of the Tuolumne and Mariposa Counties Web Link Comments due Serve comments on: (email[s]) Simin Litkouhi at Resolution No. T-17602 Voting Meeting Agenda Date April 26, 2018 Subject Matter California Teleconnect Fund Appeal of Eligibility Determination process in compliance with D.18-01-006 Web Link Comments due Serve comments on: (email[s]) Karo Serle at ks1@cpuc.ca.gov ADVICE LETTER SUBMISSIONS To inquire about filings, suspension or protest, call or email the Energy Division (415-703-1974 or email: EDTariffUnit@cpuc.ca.gov), Communications Division (415-703-3052) or Water Division (415-703-1133 or email: ). 12/29/17 Energy 49E Pilot Power Group, Inc., January 2018 Biennial Energy Storage Compliance Report. (anticipated effective 01/28/18) 02/15/18 Energy 30E Marin Clean Energy, 2018 GHG EPS Compliance Filing. (anticipated effective 03/15/18) 03/14/18 Telecom 47231 Pacific Bell, Business Cost Assessment Charge (effective TBD) 03/14/18 Telecom 47232 Pacific Bell, Withdraw from Centralized Credit Check System (effective TBD) 03/15/18 Telecom 109 Arrival Communications, Inc., Performance bond in compliance with D. (effective TBD) 03/15/18 Telecom 12 Mpower Networks Services, Inc., Performance Bond in compliance with D. (effective TBD) 03/15/18 Telecom 91 NetFortris Acquisition Co., Inc., Annual Performance Bond (effective TBD) 03/19/18 Telecom 85 Business Telecom, LLC d/b/a EarthLink Business, CPCN's Performance Bonds (effective TBD) 03/19/18 Telecom 34 CTC Communications Corp, CPCN's Performance Bonds (effective TBD) 03/19/18 Telecom 63 DeltaCom, LLC, CPCN's performance bonds (effective TBD) 03/19/18 Telecom 163 Talk America, LLC, CPCN's Performance Bonds (effective TBD)
Internal and external relationships Collaborators/colleagues in other work areas and institutions. Special Requirements To attend national and international conferences for the purpose of disseminating research results. Applications will be considered from candidates who are working towards or nearing completion of a relevant PhD qualification. The title of Research Fellow will be applied upon completion of PhD. Prior to the qualification being awarded the title of Senior Research Assistant will be given. PERSON SPECIFICATION Criteria Essential Desirable How to be assessed Qualifications, knowledge and experience PhD or equivalent professional qualifications and experience in Physics, Chemistry, Materials Science or relevant Detailed understanding and knowledge of one or more of following: computational thermodynamics, diffusion kinetic simulations, solid-state precipitation modelling, atomistic simulations, transmission electron microscopy, and/or CALPHAD database development. Knowledge of physical metallurgy or solid-state physics. Excellent communication skills in English are expected Experience of independent writing of scientific papers and presentation at conferences. CV, Interview Planning and organising Able to organise own research activities to deadline and quality standards CV, Interview Problem solving and initiative Able to develop understanding of complex problems and apply knowledge to address them Able to develop original techniques/methods CV, Interview Management and teamwork Able to supervise work of junior research staff, delegating effectively Able to contribute to Academic Unit management and administrative processes Work effectively in a team, understanding the strengths and weaknesses of others to help teamwork development CV, Interview Communicating and influencing Communicate new and complex information effectively, both verbally and in writing, engaging the interest Interview
systems needed to run a country had been created. The delegates decided that it was time to present the plan to the people. On , the delegates to the Constitutional Convention approved the plan and released it to the public. The new Constitution could only be accepted by following the rules of the Articles of Confederation – nine of thirteen states had to vote to approve the Constitution and make it the new system of government. Benjamin Franklin best expressed the doubts that all of the delegates had before signing the Constitution when he said the following to George Washington: “It…astonishes me, Sir, to find this system approaching so near perfection as it does…Thus I consent (agree), sir, to this constitution because I expect no better, and because I am not sure it is not the best.” EFFECT: Almost immediately, two groups began to form to fight for and against the Constitution. The Federalists supported the Constitution and the strong national government that it created. The Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution and felt that it gave the national government too much power over the state governments. They were also worried that there was no bill of rights included in the Constitution to protect the basic rights of the people. Voting to Approve the Constitution Original First Page of the Constitution Review Questions 1. What was the second major dispute at the Constitutional Convention over? 2. Describe the two major parts of the “Three-Fifths Compromise.” 3. What did the Three-Fifths Compromise fail to settle? 4. What did the decision to avoid slavery lead to in History? 5. How was the new Constitution accepted into law? Name: _______________________________ Social Studies Seven/PD: _____ Chapter Seven/Part Five – Putting the Constitution into Operation V. Putting the Constitution Into Operation
addressing the following issues: (1) rejecting the Ellwood contract at this time; (2) ordering SCE to seek to meet local subarea needs with preferred resources; (3) ordering SCE to prepare an RFO for the entire sub-area. CEJA therefore requests that the Commission find a substantial contribution warranting an award of intervenor compensation for the reasonable costs and expenses incurred by CEJA as follows: 1. Do not approve Ellwood contract at this time: CEJA argued that the Ellwood contract should not be approved at this time. The final decision rejected the Ellwood contract, without prejudice to re-application. Notice of Ex Parte Communication by the California Environmental Justice Alliance (6/7/17); Notice of Ex Parte Communication by the California Environmental Justice Alliance (6/19/17); Notice of Ex Parte Communication by the California Environmental Justice Alliance and the City of Oxnard (9/11/17); Notice of Ex Parte Communication by the California Environmental Justice Alliance (9/22/17). Decision, p. 21. Ordering paragraph 1, p. 27. Verified 2. Order SCE to seek to meet Goleta need with non-fossil fuel alternatives: CEJA argued that SCE should reinitiate its preferred resources RFO for the sub-area. The Decision requires SCE to review options for preferred Notice of Ex Parte Communication by the California Environmental Justice Alliance (6/7/17). Notice of Ex Parte Communication by the California Environmental Justice Alliance (9/22/17). Decision, pp. 18-19 (in absence of urgent timeline, “other options should be reviewed, including preferred resources….”) Verified
Public Workshop Notice: R.12-10-012 & R.15-03-010 – California Advanced Services Fund Public Forum/Workshop. March 30, 2018 10 am – 4 pm Ronald Reagan Administrative Building 300 S. Spring Street Los Angeles CA 90013 Webcast Information: For more information: Public Meeting Notice: CPUC and Energy Commission Convene Disadvantaged Communities Advisory Group April 4, 2018 10am- 3:30 pm California Energy Commission – Art Rosenfeld Hearing Room 1516 Ninth Street, 1st Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 Webcast information: . Public Meeting Notice: California Teleconnect Fund Qualifying Services April 9, 2018 10 am – 5 pm Commission Headquarters – Courtyard Room San Francisco CA 94102 Participant call in: (800) 603-7556 Participant Passcode: 748 512 232 Contact: For more information: Public Workshop Notice: R.12-06-013 Marketing Education and Outreach (ME&O) Working Group April 10, 2018 10:30 am – 4 pm Commission Headquarters– Courtyard Room San Francisco, CA 94102 Webcast information: Meeting access code: 627 016 258 Participant call in: 1-510-338-9438 Participant passcode: 627 016 258 Contact: Whitney Richardson at or 415-703-2108 Public Workshop Notice: A. 17-11-009 PG&E 2019 Gas Transmission and Storage Rate case April 12, 2018 Pacific Energy Center