zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Comments on Draft Resolution In compliance with Public Utilities Code, §311(g), a notice letter was emailed on July 6, 2018, informing all parties on the CASF Distribution List of the availability of the draft of this Resolution for public comments at the Commission’s documents website at . This letter also informed parties that the final conformed Resolution adopted by the Commission will be posted and available at the same website. findings Resolution T-17539 (adopted December 15, 2016) conditionally authorized a CASF grant of $3,645,085 to Siskiyou Telephone to construct the Somes Bar Project, subject to the Commission’s completion of CEQA review. As the lead agency under CEQA, the CPUC prepared an IS/MND for the Somes Bar Project. The Siskiyou Telephone Soma Bar Project IS/MND has been completed in compliance with CEQA and is adequate for the Commission’s decision making purposes. The proposed project would have no significant effects on the environment with the incorporation of mitigation measures identified and listed in the MMRP. Siskiyou Telephone will implement the measures contained in the MMRP as conditions of project approval, and have adopted a system to document and verify MMRP implementation. The IS/MND reflects the Commission’s independent judgment and analysis on the issues addressed by the IS/MND. With the adoption of this Resolution, Siskiyou Telephone has satisfied the conditions required to release funds for the construction of the Somes Bar Project, as set forth in Resolution T-17539. Siskiyou Telephone is required to comply with all provisions in Resolutions T-17495 and T-17623. A notice letter was e-mailed on July 6, 2018, informing all parties on the CASF distribution list of the availability of the draft of this Resolution for public comments at the Commission’s website . This letter also informed parties that the final confirmed Resolution adopted by the Commission will be posted and available at this same website.
Inquiry. The assigned Commissioner issued a scoping memo and ruling on April 5, 2018. On May 17, 2018, the assigned ALJ issued the ALJ’s Second Request for Amended Response to Inquiry Within 15 Days. On May 31, 2018, the Applicant filed an amended Response to ALJ Inquiry. The Commission has jurisdiction over this Application pursuant to Public Utilities (Pub. Util.) Code §§ 1201 to 1205. Issues Before the Commission The assigned Commissioner’s May 31, 2018 scoping memo identified the issues to be determined as follows: Review of the Application for compliance with Commission requirements – including Rule 3.9 and General Order 26-D – such that the Commission should grant CHSRA’s application to construct a new grade-separated railroad crossing at CHSTS MP 281.4. Review and consideration of the Final Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement for the Fresno to Bakersfield Section of the California High-Speed Train Project, dated April 2014, prepared by the CHSRA to determine whether the Commission approves construction of the proposed railroad crossing as a Responsible Agency, in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Review of the CHSRA’s justification for granting a period of 36-months from the Application approval date to complete the proposed railroad crossing. Consideration of SED’s detailed analysis and recommendation of issues in this proceeding, including details of its field review, analysis and reasoning for its recommendations regarding the Application, the proposed railroad crossing and CEQA issues raised by the proposed railroad crossing, if any.
Public Utilities Commission of the State of California Alice Stebbins, Executive Director Headquarters 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 (415) 703-2782 Southern California Office 320 West 4th Street, Suite 500 Los Angeles, CA 90013 (213) 576-7000 Sacramento Office 300 Capitol Mall Sacramento CA 95814 (800) 848-5580 Website: Daily Calendar Tuesday, July 10, 2018 Commission Voting Meetings Commissioner All-Party Meetings Other Public Meetings Petitions for Modification Submissions Filings Suspensions Protest The Commission’s policy is to schedule hearings (meetings, workshops, etc.) in locations that are accessible to people with disabilities. The CPUC encourages all Californians to participate in its meetings, hearings, workshops, and proceedings. We try to hold our public meetings only in places that are wheelchair accessible and which can accommodate specialized equipment and other services useful to people with disabilities. Please see the notice of the meeting you wish to attend for more specifics. If you plan to attend and need specialized accommodations for a particular meeting that are not listed in the notice, request them from the Public Advisor’s Office at least three business days in advance of the meeting. Contact the Public Advisor’s Office by any one of the following: Email: toll-free: 1-866-849-8390 Voice: 415-703-2074 FAX: 415-355-5404 (Attn.: Public Advisor) TTY: 1-866-836-7825 (toll-free) 1-415-703-5282 COMMISSION VOTING MEETINGS
shall be served on the assigned ALJ, unless the assigned ALJ directs otherwise in a future ruling. Addition to Official Service List Addition to the official service list is governed by Rule 1.9(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. Any person will be added to the “Information Only” category of the official service list upon request for electronic service of all documents in the proceeding, and should do so promptly in order to ensure timely service of comments and other documents and correspondence in the proceeding. (See Rule 1.9(f).) The request must be sent to the Process Office by email () or letter (Process Office, California Public Utilities Commission, 505 Van Ness Avenue, San Francisco, California 94102). Please include the Docket Number of this Rulemaking in the request. Persons who file responsive comments become parties to the proceeding (see Rule 1.4(a)(2)) and will be added to the “Parties” category of the official service list upon such filing. In order to assure service of comments and other documents and correspondence in advance of obtaining party status, persons should promptly request addition to the “Information Only” category as described above; they will be removed from that category upon obtaining party status. Public Advisor Any person interested in participating in this proceeding who is unfamiliar with the Commission’s procedures may obtain more information by visiting the Commission’s website at , by calling the Commission’s Public Advisor at 8668498390 or 4157032074 or 8668367825 (TTY)), or by emailing the Public Advisor at .
Resource Income Qualified Programs Description Energy California Alternatives Rates for Energy (CARE) Provides a 2035% discount on electric bills and 20% on gas bills Family Electric Rate Assistance Program (FERA) Families whose income slightly exceeds the CARE allowances will qualify to receive FERA discounts of 12% on electricity bills Energy Savings Assistance Program (ESA) Provides nocost energy efficiency measures Discounts and Bill Assistance Programs Individual utilities offer payment assistance programs for their customers Level Payment Plans Allows a customer to pay the same amount every month by averaging household energy costs for the last 12 months Medical Baseline Extra allowances of energy are billed at the lowest rate for customers who rely on medicalrelated equipment Federal LowIncome Programs (LIHEAP) Federal programs administered by the California Department of Community Services and Development (CSD) Water California Alternatives Rates for Water (CARW) Provides a discount on water bills. The amount of the discount is different for each water IOU. LowIncome Customer Assistance Program (LICAP) Similar to CARW Water Rate Assistance Program (WRAP) Similar to CARW Water Invoice and Statement Help (WISH) Similar to CARW LowIncome Ratepayer Assistance (LIRA) Similar to CARW Help to Others (H2O) Similar to CARW
fouryear, phaseout of the PCIA exemption for the customers who currently receive it. CCEA and ORA support similar relief. The Joint Utilities oppose any phasein and argue that the Commission should not consider bill impacts. The parties on both sides of this issue present their arguments about bill impacts in a muddled fashion that is of little assistance to the Commission. Advocates of a phasein calculate their estimated bill impacts incorrectly by representing the impact of new PCIA charges in relation to only the utilities’ portion of the customer bill, not the entire bill, but appear to be relying on calculations provided by the utilities themselves. The Joint Utilities readily fault these parties for this error, but provide no alternative calculations for our consideration. We provide here what we consider to be properly calculated bill impacts due to the removal of the PCIA exemption for CARE and MB customers in Lancaster. These calculations serve as the basis for our evaluation of parties’ phasein proposals. The following assumptions are used in the calculations, and have been taken from CforAT’s opening brief (those assumptions, in turn, are taken from the jointly submitted exhibits in this proceeding, as cited below): The average bundled service CARE customer in Climate Zone 14 (where Lancaster is located) uses 617 kWh per month. The average bundled service Medical Baseline customer in Climate Zone 14 uses 900 kWh per month. SCE’s forecast 2018 PCIA for the 2014 Vintage was $0.01889 per kWh as of October 10, 2017. SCE’s baseline “delivery rate” for CARE customers was $0.03453 per kWh, and the rate for usage between 101% and 400% of baseline was $0.09126 per kWh as of October 10, 2017. SCE’s baseline “delivery rate” for MB customers was $0.08722 per kWh as of October 10, 2017.
payment plans or options, if any, offered by the for departing load CARE and MB customers. SCE and SDG&E shall submit Tier 1 Advice Letters within 30 days of the effective date of this decision, establishing a memorandum account to record and track their respective shares of the costs associated with this outreach effort. . the Conclusion This Decision establishes an equal footing for CARE and MB customers served by the Southern California Joint Utilities and those served by CCAs in Southern California. The PCIA exemptions established for these departing load customers are no longer justified as a matter of policy, and we remove those
How can the principles of information architecture be used to improve OPACs? 12 11/23 THANKSGIVING BREAK 13 11/30 Exercises: OPAC Usability Testing Discussion: What should a library OPAC do and what features should it have? How can visualizations and display standards be used to improve OPACs? Assignment 6: Classification 14 12/7 Current Trends in Information Organization Exercises: Job Ad Analysis Exercise Discussion: What are some of the current trends in information organization? How can libraries benefit from new technologies? What skills are required for IO jobs? 15 12/14 Presentation 16 No class Final Paper submission GRADING SCALE Please note that students in the MLIS program are required to earn a B or higher in this course in order to meet the requirements of the SOIS master’s degree. MLIS students who do not receive at least a B in this course will have to repeat the course. Formatting Guidelines for Assignments Assignments should be written using a Sans-Serif style font. Do not use red for emphasis or to highlight your answers to questions. Remove all extraneous information before submission to ensure clarity (e.g. assignment instructions or tips).
Pursuant to the schedule ultimately determined by the assigned Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), opening briefs were filed on February 20, 2018 by SCE and SDG&E (jointly, as the Southern California Joint Utilities; any reference in this decision to “Joint Utilities” is also a reference solely to SCE and SDG&E), CCEA, WRCOG , LACCE and CVAG (jointly, as Joint Parties), ORA and CforAT. Reply Briefs were filed on March 13, 2018 by the Southern California Joint Utilities, CCEA, ORA and CforAT (jointly) and Brightline Defense. After briefs and reply briefs were filed, several procedural motions were filed that we address in this decision. On March 13, 2018 SCE filed a Motion for Submission of Additional Evidence into the Record. On March 28, 2018 ORA filed a Motion to Strike Declarations and Related References in the Reply Brief of Southern California Edison Company and San Diego Gas & Electric Company on Track 1 Issues. Finally, in a procedural development that affects the scope of the instant decision, on March 28, 2018 PG&E filed and served on behalf of itself and CforAT, MCE, ORA, TURN, and Brightline Defense (collectively, Settling Parties), a “Joint Motion of the Settling Parties for Adoption of Settlement Agreement”. The proposed PG&E Settlement Agreement resolves the availability of the exemption for medical baseline customers taking energy from community choice aggregators in PG&E’s service territory and will be addressed in a separate decision. Because the March 28, 2018 Settlement Agreement resolves all Track 1 issues in PG&E’s service territory, the instant decision resolves all Track 1 issues with respect to PCIA exemptions in the service territories of SCE and SDG&E.
KINDERGARTEN # STUDENTS Ruiz, Marcella 24 Sommer, Andrea 21 &19 GRADE 1 # STUDENTS Diffen, Katherine 26 Huston, Kresta 26 Strande, Laura 26 GRADE 2 # STUDENTS Rudko, Jennifer 23 Stebbing, Donna 23 Viramontes, Debra 25 GRADE 3 # STUDENTS Archer, Elaine 29 Baldwin, Cassie 30 Marshall, Lesley 30 GRADE 4 # STUDENTS Allman, Donna 29 Haney, Brittany 29 Sturgeon, Ivan 29 GRADE 5 # STUDENTS Foster, Bryan 30 Gilbertson, Karli 28 Massicotte, Michael 29 GRADE 6 # STUDENTS Barton, Patrick 84 Milchman, Jacob Milewski, Leonard GRADES 7/8 # STUDENTS Johnson, Laura 178 Mahlum, Bailey Mendez, Melissa Nord, Michelle Pagarigan,Edralin Yeoman, Veronica TOTALS # STUDENTS KINDER 64 GRADE 1 78 GRADE 2 71 GRADE 3 89 GRADE 4 87 GRADE 5 87 GRADE 6 84 GRADE 7 84 GRADE 8 94 GRAND TOTAL 738
II. LEARNING OUTCOMES Upon successful completion of this course, Crime in America, the student will be able to: A. Explain the psychological, social, and economic impact of crime in society. B. Identify characteristics of major crimes. C. Discuss the impact on society and the prevention thereof. D. List crimes by definition and classification according to major sub groupings. E. Discuss the basic theoretical and behavioral models, as well as the historical development of laws and contributions of famous law givers. F. Define selected terms vital to the understanding of the legal terminology which will be encountered in numerous Criminal Justice courses. III. INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS A. The instructional materials identified for this course are viewable through Required Student Textbook: Criminology: The Core - CTC Custom Cover Siegel 5th Cengage 2014 9781305028357 ISBN: 9781305028357 B. References: 1. Adler, Freda, Gerhard Mueller, & William Laufer, Criminology and the Criminal Justice System, 4th Ed, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2001. 2. Schmalleger, Frank, Criminology Today, 3rd Ed, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2002. 3. Reid, Sue Titus, Crime and Criminology, 10th Ed, New York, NY: 2003. 4. Siegel, Larry J., Criminology, 7th Ed, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing, 2000. 5. Maxim, Paul & Paul Whitehead, Explaining Crime, 4th Ed, Woburn, MA: Butterworth-Heinenmann, 1998 6. Palacios, Wilson, Paul Cromwell, & Roger Dunham, Crime & Justice in America, 2nd Ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2002. 7. Black's Law Dictionary 8. U.S. Constitution, Bill of Rights, and latest Amendments 9. www.fbi.gov/ucr IV. COURSE REQUIREMENTS – STUDENT RESPONSIBILITIES Your first responsibility is scholarship and registration. Central Texas College (CTC)
Cellular phones, beepers, and other electronic devices will be turned off while the student is in the classroom or laboratory unless the student is using the device for class purposes. No texting or social networking is allowed during class. Instructor Discretion: The instructor reserves the right of final decision in course requirements. Civility: Individuals are expected to be cognizant of what a constructive educational experience is and respectful of those participating in a learning environment. Failure to do so can result in disciplinary action up to and including expulsion. CENTRAL TEXAS COLLEGE EUROPEAN DIVISION SCHEDULE EMSP 1401/1160-EMT Training Program Location: Camp Lemonnier, Djibouti Instructor: Baruch Zobrist Assistants: TBD Dates: 20 November 2017 to 11 January, 2018 Meeting times: Mo., We., Sa. 3½ hours per day from 18:00 to 21:30 Sundays: 21 JAN., 4 FEB., and 11 FEB. 8 hours per day from 09:00 to 18:00 with one hour lunch break Clinical Rotations: Su.-Th. 08:00 to 10:00, or as allowed by clinic. Textbook: Brady Emergency Care 13th edition Date Textbk. Chap. Instrctnl. Mtrl. TOPIC (As stated on the NHTSA EMS instructional guidelines, or course textbook) CTC course hours Lecture, Lab Lecture EMSP 1401 Instructor Lab EMSP 1160 Instructor Mo.20NOV BLS Training/Review/Situational Scenarios 3.5 We22NOV BLS Training/Review/Situational Scenarios 3.5 BLS Instrctr Sa.25NOV BLS Training/Review/Situational Scenarios 3.0 BLS Instrctr Sa. 1 Introduction to Emergency Care 0.5 WEEK 2 Mo.27NOV 1 Introduction to Emergency Care 1.0 Mo. 2 Well-Being of the EMT-Basic 2.0 Mo. 3 Lifting and Moving Patients 0.5 We29NOV 3 Lifting and Moving Patients 0.5 We. 4 Medical/Legal-Ethical Issues 1.0 We. 5 Medical Terminology 1.0 We. 6 Anatomy & Physiology 1.0 Sa.2 DEC 6 Anatomy & Physiology 1.0 Sa. 7 Ventilation, Perfusion, & Shock: Pathophysiology 2.5 WEEK 3 Mo.4 DEC 8 Life Span Development 1.5
CTC Lect. hours EMSP 1401 CTC Lab hours EMSP 1160 TOTAL 79.5 72 Class 26Clinic NOTE: This schedule has been constructed to show adherence in content and sequence to the US DOT NSC curriculum. In practice, lab and lecture hours may be consolidated when more than one instructor is required during lab session.
Teaching Methodologies The Instructor and Classroom Assistants will use a combination of teaching techniques, including lectures, presentations, interactive exercises, in-class debate, media, Socratic method, and active discussion sections. Materials and Assignments Wednesday, September 2 Readings: How Free Are We Wednesday, September 9 Readings: The Constitution of the United States Excerpt from Everson v Board of Education of the Township of Ewing, et al Wednesday, September 16 Prayer in the Public Schools Readings: The New York Regents Prayer Engel v Vitale The Bible School District of Abington Township, Pennsylvania v Schempp Wednesday, September 23 Prayer in the Public Schools Readings Moments of Silent Prayer Wallace, Governor of Alabama v Jaffree Ceremonial Prayer Santa Fe Independent School District v Doe Wednesday, September 30 Secularism and its Struggles Readings: Evolution Epperson v Arkansas Creationism Edwards, Governor of Louisiana v Aguillard “Public Education and Intelligent Design,” Thomas Nagel, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 36, No. 2, 2008 Nagel, Thomas. “A Philosopher Defends Religion.” Review of “Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism,” by Alvin Plantinga, New York Review of Books, September 27, 2012.
Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) network and obtain daily meter reads to provide customers with their daily energy usage as required by the Commission in Decisions related to AMI. SCE also seeks the Commission’s approval to provide the customer a bill credit based on the estimated usage of the Communication Device. When customers install meters indoors or in metering rooms, the radio frequency signal is often unable to reach the network and a Communication Device must be installed in order for the meters to communicate. Currently, Communication Devices uses SCE power via a connection ahead of the customer’s meter. This has often required conduit and wiring to be installed through customer’s walls, floors, and/or ceilings in order to reach the Communication Device location where the device is able to connect the meters to the AMI network. SCE believes that, where the customer consents to this arrangement and executes the Agreement, using the customer’s internal wiring on the customer’s side of the meter to feed the Communication Device would be more efficient and because it would eliminate the need to install the wiring through walls, floors and/or ceilings. SCE also notes that SCE has confirmed that this arrangement is consistent with San Diego Gas & Electric Company’s current practice. OF THE PROPOSED AGREEMENT SCE proposes to add the voluntary Agreement to its List of Contracts and Deviations. The proposed Agreement sets forth the terms and conditions upon which SCE would connect to the customer’s side of the meter and provide the customer a bill credit based on the estimated usage of the Communication Device. Under the arrangement described above, SCE and the customer will execute the Agreement permitting SCE to install the Communication Device and connect to the customer’s power. Among other provisions, the Agreement also authorizes SCE access to the Communication Device for maintenance, repair and replacement. Pursuant to the effective
rates, and is never ‘free’ as asserted by PG&E and SDG&E in their comments on the Proposed Decision.” Multiple-Use Applications In considering the treatment of “service and revenue stacking,” TURN noted that one challenge of ensuring that MUA storage assets have the chance to provide and be paid for all their potential services – but only for those services they actually provide – is the number of discrete venues in which such services may be provided (such as to customers “behind the meter,” to the distribution grid, to the transmission grid, to bilateral Resource Adequacy (RA) capacity markets, and/or to CAISO energy markets). TURN suggested that the Commission put the onus on the utilities procuring storage to meet their ES program targets to ensure that all the services they purchase from an MUA storage asset (and resulting payments they expect to make) are properly counted once, but only once. TURN explained that the utilities’ knowledge of all aspects of utility operations from the customer to the generator should enable them to assess which services can be “stacked” and thus which revenues may be reasonably paid. To implement this approach, TURN suggested that the Commission require that purchasers of MUA storage services include contract language to ensure that all the services they purchase from an MUA storage asset (and resulting payments they expect to make) are properly counted once, but only once, such as through an affidavit from the MUA asset owner. The Commission in D.18-01-003 addressed the concerns TURN raised (as did other parties) about transparency and in Rule 9 and Rule 11. Rule 9 requires: “In response to a utility request for offer, the storage provider is required to D.18-01-003, Appendix A, Rules 9 and 11 TURN Reply Cmts on Joint Staff Proposal for MUA, 6/30/17, pp. 3-4 D.18-01-003, p. 15; Appendix A, Rules 5, 6, 7 TURN Reply Cmts on Joint Staff Proposal for MUA, 6/30/17, pp. 5-6 D.18-01-003, p. 17; Appendix A, Rule 10 TURN Reply Cmts on Joint Staff Proposal for MUA, 6/30/17, pp. 6-7 Verified
Section of the Resolution. Frontier must provide the PEA prior to the first payment. CASF will reimburse Energy Division for all costs related to the PEA. This Resolution is effective today. I hereby certify that this Resolution was adopted by the Public Utilities Commission at its regular meeting on July 12. The following Commissioners approved it: /s/ Alice Stebbins ALICE STEBBINS Executive Director MICHAEL PICKER President CARLA J. PETERMAN MARTHA GUZMAN ACEVES LIANE M. RANDOLPH CLIFFORD RECHTSCHAFFEN Commissioners
On April 16, 2018, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), Southern California Edison Company (SCE), and San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E)—collectively, the Investor-Owned Utilities (IOUs)—filed Advice Letters (ALs) 5277-E, 3787-E, and 3211-E, respectively, proposing formats and implementation workplans for their annual Grid Needs Assessment (GNA) and Distribution Deferral Opportunity Report (DDOR) filings in compliance with Ordering Paragraph (OP) 2.k of Decision (D.)18-02-004. This Resolution approves the IOUs’ proposed implementation workplans and adopts formats for the annual GNA and DDOR filings. PG&E and SCE’s GNA and DDOR formats are approved with modification. SDG&E’s format is rejected and SDG&E is ordered to use either PG&E or SCE’s format for their 2018 GNA and DDOR. The GNA and DDOR are foundational elements of the annual Distribution Investment Deferral Framework, enabling the Commission and stakeholders to ensure that candidate distribution deferral projects proposed by IOUs maximize the ratepayer benefits of distributed energy resources. On August 14, 2014, the Commission issued Rulemaking (R.)14-08-013 to establish policies, procedures, and rules to guide California IOUs in developing Distribution Resource Plans (DRPs) required by Public Utilities (P.U.) Code §769. On October 21, 2016, the Commission issued the Assigned Commissioner’s Ruling on Track 3 Issues, which included consideration of a Distribution Investment Deferral Process as the third Sub-track of DRP Track 3. Subsequently, the Commission issued D.18-02-004 (the Decision) on February 15, 2018 approving an annual Distribution Investment Deferral Framework (DIDF) whose central objective is to identify and capture opportunities for distributed energy resources (DERs) to cost-effectively defer or avoid traditional IOU investments that are planned to mitigate forecasted deficiencies on the distribution system. The Decision adopted two new IOU reports that serve as
2018 Flexible Capacity Needs NOTE: All numbers are in Megawatts CAISO System Flexible Requirement CPUC CPUC Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Flexible Requirement (minimum) (100% less Cat. 1 & 3) (maximum) January 13,415 12,437 4,806 7,010 622 February 14,409 13,151 5,081 7,413 658 March 13,435 12,801 4,946 7,215 640 April 12,272 11,876 4,589 6,694 594 May 13,095 12,308 6,746 4,946 615 June 11,497 10,688 5,858 4,295 534 July 10,908 10,156 5,567 4,081 508 August 11,219 10,789 5,914 4,336 539 September 14,248 13,468 7,383 5,413 673 October 14,271 13,291 5,135 7,491 665 November 14,505 13,569 5,243 7,648 678 December 15,743 14,611 5,646 8,236 731
about Latin America. Intro to the class: how stuff works… How to study for this course, how to get your books. Terminology. What is Latin American? What is in a term? Geography of the region. “Our America…” Suggested movie to watch at home: A Day without a Mexican. Get news about Latin America. Read Galeano’s “Seven Years After,” “Foreword” and “Introduction.” Read LAS “Glossary” and “Geography” Take first quiz on D2L. Children of the Days Galeano’s “Seven Years After,” “Foreword” and “Introduction.” LAS “Glossary” and “Geography” Why did Venezuelan president give Obama the book—in Spanish? Suggested movie to watch at home: Under the Same Moon. Get news Read Galeano’s “Lust for Gold…” Take quiz Sign for your country presentation. Children of the Days. Galeano’s “Lust for Gold…” Who are we? Who were we? “Frijolero,” Music in translation: from the U.S. through the Patagonia. Get news Read Gonzalez’ “Puerto Rico: The Country” on D2L Children of the Days. Children of the Days. Independence! Really? Gonzalez’ “Puerto Rico: The Country” Get news Children of the Days. Read LAS “Politics” Take quiz Sign up for your country presentation. Prepare for it! Children of the Days. LAS “Politics” First Paper Due Country Presentations begin. Get news Read Galeano’s “King Sugar…” Take quiz Children of the Days. Children of the Days./ Country Presentations. Sugar, Bananas, Maquilas… Galeano’s “King Sugar…” Suggested movie to watch at home: The Price of Sugar Get news Prepare your country presentation! Watch PBS or Read Gates’ “Black in Latin America.” Read ¿Y tu agüela, aonde ejtá? on D2L by Fernando Fortunato Vizcarondo Read LAS “Race in L.A.” (10) LAS "Race in Latin America" PBS or Gates’ “Black in Latin America. Africa Dwells in LA. Suggested movie to watch at home: City of God or Bus 174 Read LAS “Colonialism”
ENGLISH 825.001 SEMINAR IN MAJOR FIGURES: JAMES JOYCE Spring 2018 T 4:00-6:40 CRT 468 Professor José Lanters Office: CRT 489 Email: Course Description James Joyce (1882-1941), one of the major representatives of literary Modernism, famously claimed that his works would keep the critics busy for a hundred years. Indeed, since the 1960s, what has come to be known as the ‘Joyce industry’ has outstripped the ‘Shakespeare industry’ and generated a wealth of critical and theoretical readings of Joyce’s oeuvre that reveal the multi-faceted nature of his accomplishment. In this course, we will focus on Dubliners, A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, and Ulysses, and explore the nature and history of critical responses to these works. Reading List James Joyce, Dubliners, ed. Margot Norris (Norton Critical Edition) James Joyce, A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, ed. John Paul Riquelme (Norton Critical Edition) James Joyce, Ulysses (Vintage, Gabler edition) Joseph Brooker, Joyce’s Critics: Transitions in Reading (U of Wisconsin Press) Don Gifford, Ulysses Annotated (U of California Press) Assessment 2 research papers (one on the early works; one on Ulysses) (35% each) class participation (10%) class presentation (20%)
Public Workshop Notice – California Advanced Services Fund Infrastructure Workshop July 25, 2018 9:30am – 4pm California Environmental Protection Agency 1001 I St, Sierra Hearing Room Sacramento CA Contact: Caleb Jones at . NEW PROCEEDINGS 7-16-2018 A.18-07- 013 - Application of Pacific Gas and Electric Company for Authorization to Establish the Diablo Canyon Decommissioning Planning Cost Memorandum Account (U39E). PETITIONS FOR MODIFICATION - NONE DRAFT RESOLUTIONS Issued for public comment. Comments are governed by Rule 14.5. Draft Resolution No. E-4937 Meeting Date July 26, 2018 Subject Matter Resolution E-4937. Authorizing Southern California Edison’s plan to conduct a solicitation for energy storage to comply with SB 801 (Stern) Web Link Comments Due Date July 16,2018 Serve comments on: (email[s]) or Draft Resolution No. T-17606 Meeting Date July 26, 2018 Subject Matter California Teleconnect Fund Program Surcharge Adjustment Web Link Comments Due Date July 6, 2018 Serve comments on: (email[s]) Draft Resolution No. T-17615 Meeting Date July 26, 2018 Subject Matter Approval of the California Telecommunications Public Purpose Programs estimated budgets for the 2018-2019 Fiscal Year.
Yes No C. PHYSICAL RESTRAINTS AND SECLUSION 1. Did the resident die while in restraint or seclusion? 2. Did the restraint / seclusion have a direct relationship to the resident’s death? 3. Did the resident sustain any injury while in restraint or seclusion? Reason for Reporting Name – Residential Case Manager Telephone Number SIGNATURE – Person Completing Form Date Signed Title – Person Completing Form Telephone Number TO BE COMPLETED BY THE LICENSING SPECIALIST Name (Print) Telephone Number SIGNATURE – Licensing Specialist Date this CFS-2183 is forwarded to DSP Child Welfare Program Specialist (mm/dd/yyyy)
3.2.9 ∆IL, Imax & Imin ∆IL = = = 97.5mA Imax = Io 5% + = 0.021 + = 69.8mA Imin = Io 5% + = 0.021 - = 27.8mA
X (Number of Months Measure Was Not Met 7) = Fine of $63,000 Answer Time for Trouble Reports and Billing and Non-Billing Inquiries The Answer Time standard, defined in § 3.5, measures the amount of time it takes for an operator to answer the phone when customers call a business office for billing and non-billing inquiries or a repair office for trouble reports. The value is calculated as an average answer time of a sample of the answering interval of calls to business and repair offices that is representative of the reported period. The Minimum Standard Reporting Level for the Answer Time is 80% of calls answered by an operator within 60 seconds when speaking to a live agent, or 80% of calls answered within 60 seconds when speaking to a live agent after completing an interactive voice response or automatic response unit system. The fine structure is as follows: Base Answer Time Fine, GO 133-D, § 9.5 1 or 2 Consecutive Months 3 to 5 Consecutive Months 6 to 8 Consecutive Months 9 to 11 Consecutive Months 12 or More Consecutive Months Fine Per Day $0 per day $500 per day $1,000 per day $1,500 per day $2,000 per day Days in a Month (for all months) 30 days 30 days 30 days 30 days 30 days Base Fine per Month $0 $15,000 $30,000 $45,000 $60,000 Citizens Frontier’s results follow: 2017 Reporting for Answer Time, GO 133-D § 3.5 – 80% minimum Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Citizens Frontier 71.6% 55.5% 73.2% 85.5% 90.7% 90.3% 81.1% 68.5% 62.5% 45.0% 53.1% 70.9% Citizens Frontier failed to meet the standard from January through March and August through December. The company excluded January through March from its reported Answer Time results per § 3.4(b) for catastrophic events due to the severe winter storms and subsequent Governor’s Emergency Proclamations. The company entered “chronic failure status” beginning in October and incurred fines for its substandard performance during the last three months of the year. Staff agrees with the fine calculated as: (Scaling Factor 1.20%) x (Monthly Base Fine $15,000) x (Number of Months Measure Was Not Met 3) = Fine of $540 Alternative Proposal for Mandatory Corrective Action, § 9.7
Collaborates, consults with and provides accurate information to the health consumer and other health professionals about the prescribed interventions or treatments. Demonstrates a comprehensive knowledge of community services and resources and actively supports service users to use them. Reviews policies, processes, procedures based on relevant research. Recognises and identifies researchable practice issues and refers them to appropriate people. Distributes research findings that indicate changes to practice to colleagues. Quality and Risk Adherence to Southern Performance Excellence and Quality Improvement Strategy. Works collaboratively with Occupational Health, Quality and Risk and Infection Control to maintain organisational standards. Reviews and implements systems to ensure that processes to establish monitor and review the service specific standards of practice and indicators of clinical practice for nursing are established and maintained. Demonstrates an understanding of risk, identifying emerging risks and ensuring risk mitigation action plans are developed and followed through. Demonstrates a sound understanding of the Southern District Health Board quality management framework, contributing to and leading quality initiatives. Demonstrates competence in emergency procedures, e.g. fire, and CPR. Completes Fire, CPR training and updates regularly as required by ’s policies and procedures. Identifies, takes appropriate action and promptly reports clinical, Occupational Safety & Health and security incidents. Evidence of assisting in the maintenance of ward equipment and where necessary, promptly reports unsafe or malfunctioning equipment. Maintains standards for safety, hygiene and requirements. Self-Management Develops logical and complete plans to resolve issues. Manages own time adopting a disciplined approach to establishing and following priorities of work. Exhibits self-confidence. Engages in appraisal. Relationships are developed and maintained with own peer group for robust peer review and support. Other Duties Undertaking duties from time to time that may be in addition to those outlined above but which fall within your capabilities and experience. Act as a role model for the Southern DHB Organisational Values. You respond positively to requests for assistance in own and other areas, demonstrating adaptability and willingness. You produce work that complies with SDHB processes and reflects best practice. Research undertaken is robust and well considered. Live and support the DHB values in everything you do. Professional Development – self Identifying areas for personal and professional development. Training and development goals are identified/agreed with your manager. Performance objectives reviewed annually with your manager. You actively seek feedback and accept constructive criticism.
Exercise Objectives and Core Capabilities The following exercise objectives in Table 1 describe the expected outcomes for the exercise. The objectives are linked to core capabilities, which are distinct critical elements necessary to achieve the specific mission area(s). The objectives and aligned core capabilities are guided by elected and appointed officials and selected by the Exercise Planning Team. Exercise Objective Core Capability Assess the communications process internally and externally, based on local policies and procedures. Operational Communications Review redundant communication modalities within and across response partners. Operational Communications Determine strengths and weaknesses in activation of medical and health partners surge plans. Identify critical issues and potential solutions. Public Health and Medical Services Identify the process to activate the ICS in response to an emerging infectious disease. Determine specific levels necessary based on scenario and local policies and procedures. Operational Coordination and Incident Management Identify the steps in developing an IAP and conducting associated briefings. Operational Coordination and Incident Management Identify the processes for medical and health partners to provide current situational information to the MHOAC Program Operational Coordination and Incident Management Examine the MHOAC Program’s process to develop and submit a Medical Health Situation Reports consistent with the EOM. Operational Coordination and Incident Management Identify the process for medical and health partners across the response system to request, distribute, track, and return medical countermeasure resources, including scarce resources, consistent with the EOM. Public and Private Services and Resources Validate the processes in place to activate the local disaster medical volunteer system. Public and Private Services and Resources Validate the process for epidemiological surveillance information communication and coordination among Medical Health partners, including; CDPH, LHD, Hospitals (specifically between infection prevention, and LHD Public Health and Medical Services
D: Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Reauthorization Act of 2013 PAHPRA Reauthorization Act at and more resources at Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Ready.Gov Be informed: Learn what protective measures to take before, during, and after an emergency available at: 4/11/2014 Capability 10: Medical Surge www.cdc.gov/phpr/capabilities/capability10.pdf HSEEP 2013 home page: CHA Emergency Preparedness Website available at: 28. EOM
BACKGROUND California LifeLine Program Requirements The purpose of the California LifeLine Program is to provide high quality, residential telephone service at affordable rates to low-income citizens of California. The California Legislature directed the CPUC to ensure that the program has essential consumer protections and is competitively neutral. A carrier seeking to be a California LifeLine provider must comply with the CPUC’s LifeLine rules and requirements set forth in Public Utilities Code § 871 et seq., General Order (GO) 153 and various CPUC decisions including D.14-01-036 and D.10-11-033. The carrier must also comply with all applicable CPUC rules, orders, decisions, resolutions, the Public Utilities Code and federal Lifeline rules. In order to become a California LifeLine provider, a carrier must generally demonstrate the following: It has a valid, active operating authority issued by the CPUC; It is current in its remittance of CPUC User Fees and public purpose program surcharges; Its proposed offerings meet the CPUC’s California LifeLine service elements; Its disclosures, schedule of rates and charges, and terms and conditions are thorough and consistent with state and federal rules; Its marketing and selling methods are consistent with D.14-01-036 and 47 C.F.R. § 54.405(b); and Its provisioning process is consistent with and in compliance with the California LifeLine Administrator’s enrollment process, validation checks, transmission requirements, and efforts to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse. If a carrier is seeking to offer LifeLine wireless services in California, the carrier must demonstrate that its proposed offerings meet the CPUC’s LifeLine wireless service elements. The CPUC adopted the California LifeLine wireless service elements in set forth in GO 153, Appendix A-2. Some of the key service elements are as follows: The provider must offer participants the ability to place and receive voice-grade calls over all distances using the public switched telephone network or successor network; The provider must offer free, unlimited access to public safety N11s (211, 311, 511, 711, and 811) for California LifeLine eligible plans with 1,000 or more voice minutes, and to 911 emergency services for all California LifeLine eligible plans;
+CH 228 CHT 121Q CH 105 CHT 154Q CH 101 CHT 155Q CH 102 COL 100S NCT COL 103S ELEC ONLY COL 103S NCT COL 104S NCT COL 107S NCT CPT 100S NCT CPT 101S CP SC 120 CPT 102S CP SC 120 CPT 104Q NCT CPT 114S NCT CPT 120S NCT CPT 121S NCT CPT 122S NCT CPT 126S NCT CPT 162S ELEC ONLY CPT 170Q ELEC ONLY CPT 170S CP SC 120 CPT 204Q NCT CPT 224Q NCT CPT 232Q NCT CPT 233Q NCT CPT 242Q CP SC 220 CPT 242S CP SC 220 CPT 259Q NCT CPT 259S NCT CPT 264Q NCT CPT 264S NCT CRJ 101S ELEC ONLY CRJ 115S ELEC ONLY CRJ 125S ELEC ONLY CRJ 130S ELEC ONLY CRJ 145S ELEC ONLY CRJ 218S ELEC ONLY CRJ 220S ELEC ONLY CRJ 242S ELEC ONLY CRJ 246S ELEC ONLY ECO 100S NCT ECO 101S ECON 200 ECO 210S ECON 212 ECO 211S ECON 211 ECO 253Q ECON 212 ECO 254Q ECON 211 EET 132Q NCT ENG 100S NCT ENG 101Q ENGL 101 ENG 101S ENGL 101 ENG 102S ENGL 103 ENG 150S NCT ENG 155S NCT ENG 201S ENGL 214 ENG 202S ENGL 214 ENG 203S ENGL 214 ENG 205S ENGL 213
SOC 206S ELEC ONLY SOC 210S ELEC ONLY SOC 220S ELEC ONLY SOC 235S ELEC ONLY SPA 100S NCT SPA 101S SPAN 101 SPA 102S SPAN 102 SPA 104Q SPAN 101 SPA 105Q SPAN 102 SPA 201S SPAN 201 SPA 202S SPAN 202 SPC 205S COMM 250 SPC 209S ELEC ONLY SPC 210S ELEC ONLY SPC 220Q COMM 250 THE 101S THEA 210 CENTRAL CAROLINA TECHNICAL COL , SC TRANSFER CLEMSON COURSE EQUIVALENT ACC 100S NCT ACC 101Q ACCT 201 ACC 101S ACCT 201 ACC 102S ACCT 202 ACC 202S ELEC ONLY ACC 230S ELEC ONLY AGT 120Q AGRON 202 ANT 101S ANTH 201 ART 101S A A H 210 ART 105S ELEC ONLY AST 101Q ASTR 101 +ASTR 103 AST 101S ASTR 101 +ASTR 103 AST 102Q ASTR 102 +ASTR 104 AST 102S ASTR 102 +ASTR 104 BCT 101S C S M 100 BCT 212S C S M 205 BCT 221S C S M 203 BIO 100S NCT BIO 101S BIOL 103 +BIOL 105 BIO 102S BIOL 104 +BIOL 106 BIO 108Q BIOL 103 BIO 109Q BIOL 104 BIO 205S ELEC ONLY BIO 206LS ELEC ONLY
TRANSFER CLEMSON COURSE EQUIVALENT ACC 100S NCT ACC 101Q ACCT 201 ACC 101S ACCT 201 ACC 102S ACCT 202 ACC 230S ELEC ONLY ANT 101S ANTH 201 ART 101S A A H 210 ART 105S ELEC ONLY AST 101Q ASTR 101 +ASTR 103 AST 101S ASTR 101 +ASTR 103 AST 102Q ASTR 102 +ASTR 104 AST 102S ASTR 102 +ASTR 104 BIO 101S BIOL 103 +BIOL 105 BIO 102S BIOL 104 +BIOL 106 BIO 108Q BIOL 103 +BIOL 105 BIO 109Q BIOL 104 +BIOL 106 BIO 210S BIOSC 222 BIO 211S BIOSC 223 BIO 225S MICRO 205 CHM 100S NCT CHM 110S CH 101 CHM 111S CH 102 CHM 112S CH 106 CHM 211S CH 223 +CH 227 CHM 212S CH 224 +CH 228 CHT 154Q CH 101 CHT 155Q CH 102 COL 100S NCT COL 103S ELEC ONLY COL 104S NCT COL 107S NCT CPT 100S NCT CPT 101Q ELEC ONLY CPT 101S CP SC 120 CPT 114S NCT CPT 120S NCT CPT 121S NCT CPT 122S NCT CPT 126S NCT CPT 242S CP SC 220 CPT 259S NCT
6. Out of an abundance of caution, SCE should be barred from entering into any agreement under the Master Lease Agreement that prohibits access to the lease routes entered into with Verizon. 7. We do not reach the issue of the significance of the distinction between “dark” and “lit” fiber with respect to the revenue sharing allocation adopted in D.99-07-070 because we deny revenue sharing pursuant to that allocation. 8. Nothing in the Master Lease Agreement requires or allows SCE to be exempt from compliance with any applicable rules or regulations adopted by this Commission. 9. Nothing in the Master Lease Agreement impedes with or exempt SCE’s compliance with GO’s 95 and 128 and applicable safety regulations. 10. SCE should be directed to regularly forward the individual Lease Route Orders to the Commission’s Communications Division within three business days of their receipt by SCE. 11. SCE’s motion to file its unredacted application under seal should be granted for good cause shown. 12. GO 66-D governs the administrative processes for the submittal and release of confidential information in the Lease Route Orders to be submitted to Communications Division, including the process for considering and resolving any claims of confidentiality. 13. SCE’s motion to amend its application should be granted. 14. The Master Lease Agreement should be approved subject to a 25/75 shareholder/ratepayer revenue sharing allocation of revenues and conditioned upon SCE’s regular submission of the Lease Route Orders to the Communications Division.
ALJ/HSY/avs Date of Issuance 6/26/2018 Decision 18-06-011 June 21, 2018 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Pacific Gas and Electric Company to Recover Costs Recorded in the Catastrophic Event Memorandum Account Pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 454.9. (U39E.) Application 16-10-019 DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT Summary This decision approves the all-party settlement agreement resolving this matter. Pacific Gas and Electric Company may recover in revenue requirement $117.0 million of its electric distribution, gas distribution, and gas transmission expense and capital costs associated with responding to 15 catastrophic events from 2012 to March 2016. This proceeding is closed. 1. Procedural Background Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) filed this application on October 31, 2016, to recover incremental gas and electric costs recorded in its Catastrophic Event Memorandum Account (CEMA) and incurred while responding to declared disasters from 2012 to March 2016. The Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA) and The Utility Reform Network (TURN) protested the application. After the conduct of a prehearing conference on December 19, 2016, the assigned Commissioner issued a scoping memo identifying the issues to be addressed as follows:
future CEMA applications. TURN’s litigation position also recommends disallowing $16.7 million in expense and $14.9 million in capital expenditures associated with straight-time labor, and disallowing $1.0 million for overhead costs associated with straight-time labor. 5. Settlement Agreement The parties agree to and ask the Commission to adopt the following terms and conditions of the settlement agreement: PG&E’s total CEMA revenue requirement shall be reduced by $28.8 million, from $145.8 million to $117.0 million. PG&E’s CEMA revenue requirement of $117.0 million shall include $110.6 million for electric distribution ($105.8 million for 2018, $4.8 million for 2019), $5.1 million for gas distribution ($5.1 million for 2018), and $1.3 million for gas transmission ($1.3 million for 2018). CEMA costs will be recovered in the same manner as other electric distribution, gas distribution, and gas transmission costs are recovered in rates, using existing methodologies for revenue allocation and rate design. PG&E’s CEMA revenue requirement for 2018 will be recovered through rates beginning January 1, 2018, or as soon thereafter as practicable following a final decision in this proceeding. PG&E’s CEMA revenue requirement for 2019 will be recovered through rates beginning January 1, 2019. PG&E’s CEMA revenue requirement for 2020 onward shall be recovered through base revenues via PG&E’s 2020 General Rate Case. In future CEMA applications, PG&E shall provide a showing to demonstrate the reasonableness of costs requested in the application as set forth in Appendix A to the Settlement Agreement, which for Electric Distribution activities includes work-related metrics at the event level and metrics for a similar event type (e.g., storms, fires,