12365 Chu 80.34 This is not a complete sentence. Change it to a complete sentence. Revised. The part pointed out is resolved by CID 12595. 12370 Liwen Chu 80.35 Change "Per STA Info" to "Per AID TID Info" As in comment Accepted. 12596 Mark RISON 80.34 "Where Block Ack Starting Sequence Control subfield is set to 0 and RA subfield indicates the MAC address of an unassociated STA for which the Per STA Info subfield is intended." -- the BASSC subfield is therefore useless, as are the two reserved octets after it Delete "Block Ack Starting Sequence Control subfield is set to 0 and" in the cited text, and delete the "Block Ack Starting Sequence Control (0)" and "Reserved" fields in Figure 9-38c Revised. See the instructions to the TGax editor in doc. 11-18/0890. Note that the intention is to keep the basic length of the Per AID TID Info subfield the same with the unit length of the BA Information field of the Multi-TID BlockAck, i.e., 12 octets. 11461 Ansley 80.34 sentence fragment lines 34 and 35 are a sentence fragment. Not sure what was meant there. Complete sentence or delete. Revised. The part pointed out is resolved by CID 12595. 12005 Yee 80.38 It is not clear or not described in text what the Ack Type in the AID TID Info subfield means. Is it just randomly selected in Table 9-24b to fit specific context? If not, please add some text to specify the physical meaning of the Ack Type subfield. As in the comment. Revised. See the instructions to the TGax editor in doc. 11-18/0890. Please see the description after Table 9-24b. Note that, although the concept of the subfield is to show whether the acknowledgement is given without Block Ack Bitmap subfield, there are 3 cases when it can be set to 1, i.e., (i) to acknowledge a single QoS Data frame that solicits an Ack frame, (ii) to acknowledge a management frame, and (iii) to acknowledge whole MPDUs within an when they are all received successfully. To avoid misinterpretation of the subfield, it is MPDU
reception of that MMPDU." That combination is reserved. Ack Type should be 1. Or maybe it's Table 9-24b that's wrong? "If the ACK Type subfield is 0 and the TID value of the Per AID TID Info subfield is 15, then the Block Ack Starting Sequence Control, 2 octets reserved and RA fields are present and the Per AID TID Info field acknowledges a Management frame sent by an unassociated non-AP STA.". Why not align all of these so that it's always Ack Type 1 and TID 15 to ack an MMPDU? Or at least the second quoted para needs to be explicitly restricted to AID11==2045 12991 Massinissa Lalam 81.46 A table similar to Table 9-24b should be produced when the AID subfield is 2045 to clarify the behavior and available combination. Otherwise, the line 46 seems a bit out of place (for AID subfield not equal to 2045, the combination described by this line (AckType=1 and TID=15) is N/A. Create a table equivalent to Table but adressing the case when AID is 2045 Revised. See the instructions to the TGax editor in doc. 11-18/0890. Deleted the cited paragraph, as it is already covered by the last sentence in the paragraph just before NOTE 1. 12598 Mark 81.51 This para and the next one seem to duplicate Table 9-24b Delete the paras in question. Move behavioural information (e.g. "acknowledges successful reception of a single indicated by the TID of the AID TID Info subfield") to Clause 27 Rejected. The 2 paragraphs are to help the interpretation of Table 9-24b. They are explaining the frame format setting and should be here in subclause 9.3.1.9.7. 12367 Liwen Chu 81.59 "The responding STA determines that all the MPDUs carried in the eliciting A-MPDU are successfully Change the text per the comment. Rejected. The sentence explains how to determine that all the MPDUs carried