zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Caltrans and the CTC consider this a Beta-Test version of the B/C Tool. Receiving constructive and honest feedback will be critical for the eventual development of the Tool to be used in Cycle 3 and beyond. With this goal in mind, applicants are highly encouraged to provide feedback on: The user interface, Tool Instructions, Types of Inputs, Calculation Logic, Inputs vs. Results, and recommended use in the future (including point valued assigned to results). Points will be awarded based on: 1) the demonstration that the Tool-inputs are appropriate as compared to this application, 2) Confirmation that the final B/C from the tool shows a value greater than 1.0, and 3) some constructive feedback was provided. Part B: Narrative Questions Detailed Instructions for: Question #7 QUESTION #7 Leveraging of NON-ATP funds (0-5 points) NOTE: All answers to are expected to follow the “Special Instructions for all Narrative Questions” included in this section of application. Failure to follow these special instructions will result in a loss of points. The application funding plan will show all federal, state and local funding for the project: (5 points max.) Points will be awarded based on the amount of the non-ATP funding pledged to the project, as follows: 1 point: zero to 12% of total project cost 2 points: >12% to 25% of total project cost 3 points: >25% to 35% of total project cost 4 points: over 35% of total project cost 1 point: match provided in same project component for which ATP funds are requested Part B: Narrative Questions Detailed Instructions for: Question #8 QUESTION #8 USE OF CALIFORNIA CONSERVATION CORPS (CCC) OR A CERTIFIED COMMUNITY CONSERVATION CORPS (0 or -5 points) NOTE: All answers to are expected to follow the “Special Instructions for all Narrative Questions” included in this section of application. Failure to follow these special instructions will result in a loss of points.
Economic Prosperity Policy DM1 Employment Sites Identifies a list of sites that will be allocated for employment uses (Business B1, General Industry B2, Storage or Distribution B8) Policy DM2 Protection of Employment Sites Sets out criteria to assess any proposed loss of employment uses on sites that will be allocated for employment Policy DM3 District and Local Retail Centres Designates the boundaries of District and Local Retail Centres Policy DM4 Retail and Leisure Impact Assessment Sets out that retail developments proposed outside a designated retail centre will need to assess its impact on centres Homes Policy DM5 Housing Sites Identifies a list of sites that will be allocated for housing development Policy DM6 Adaptable and Accessible Housing New housing developments, with more than 11 houses need to provide some homes that are flexible and adaptable for future needs of the city. Policy DM7 Spacing Standards All new homes will be required to meet the relevant minimum amount of Nationally Described Space Standards Policy DM8 Specialist Accommodation Sets out the requirement for developments to provide specialist accommodation – homes designed for people with specific needs, including people over 55 and sheltered accommodation. Policy DM9 Newcastle General Hospital Site Identifies that this site will be allocated for use development, including Business (B1), Residential Institutions (C2), Dwellinghouses (C3) and Non Residential Institutions (D1) Transport and Accessibility Policy DM10 Pedestrian and Cycle Movement Requires development to be designed to provide for walking and cycling Policy DM11 Public Transport Requires development to promote and facilitate the use of public transport. Policy DM12 Parking and Servicing Requires development to provide safe and secure parking and adequate servicing and loading facilities Policy DM13 Road Hierarchy Defines the hierarchy of different roads. Policy DM14 Mitigation and Highway Management Requires development to ensure safe and suitable access to the road network
“Blue Sky” Options Area Featured Content Social & Sharing Analysis Visualisation Traceability More Data Goal Show featured projects or collections of projects on front page Enable sharing through social media, and provide 2-way link to social media content. Enable users to get deeper into the data Show the data in more interactive and visually appealing (as well as useful) ways Allow users to trace funding flows from DFID to partners and down the chain Add new data (preferably through IATI standard format) How Content/stories from GOV.UK Special events: e.g. Humanitarian, Comic Relief Incorporate stories from social media (Flickr, Facebook etc) Post links to FB, Twitter etc. Post widgets of content to FB or other websites Include content from Twitter based on special # Data downloads at different scales and different formats Slice & dice analysis A MyDevTracker dashboard (favourite projects etc.). Linked to subscription. Interactive graphs (allow user to select content to compare) Richer maps Visualisation of partner data flow (e.g. bubble diagrams) Project-level results Country-level aggregated results Project scores Aid effectiveness indicators IATI Schema changes Data protection considerations (photos) Hosting Partner identification of traceability Development Tracker “business” owners One-off events owners
Land mobile systems with various channel spacing schemes have been deployed or are planned in 400 MHz bands. The frequency usage in border areas requires coordination of frequency channels because the coordination threshold is too restrictive for the provision of coverage in border areas. For systems with channel spacing up to 25 kHz there are well established bi- or multilateral agreements based on preferential use of frequencies. In the known agreements the threshold for preferential frequencies field strength is defined either at 40 km or 50 km distance inside the neighbouring country. For wide band systems with channel spacing greater than 1 MHz a preferential regime on preferential channels is not generally possible. However, in situations where on both sides of the border only wide band system are considered the coordination threshold can be increased in comparison to the restrictive value of the T/R 25-08 as given in ECC Report 97 [6] or ECC Recommendation (15)01 [4]. This is because wide band systems are generally more immune to interference. This Report considers the coordination thresholds for systems with channel spacing greater than 1 MHz in the 400 MHz band from both sides of the border. In addition, a case of narrow band systems on one side of the border overlapping with wide band systems on the other side of the border is considered as well, because those scenarios occur very often. The case of harmonised use of spectrum for wide band systems is not very likely to be achieved on short term, because wide band allocations differ from country to country in location in spectrum and size. Only in exceptional cases the wide band allocations are the same in border areas of neighbouring countries (e.g. Sweden and Norway). Even if in most cases wide band allocations vary among different countries, the resulting overlap between wide band and narrow band allocations across the border is typically as small as a few hundred kilohertz (below 500 kHz). This means that in such cases only a few narrow band channels have to be considered wide band allocation on the other side of the border. All path loss calculations in this study are performed by the modified Okumura-Hata model (ERC Report 68, [8]).This model is also applied for antenna height gain in the 400 MHz band. Administrations may agree in bi- or multilateral negotiations on other propagation models which could lead to slightly different results. However, for all calculations only one model shall be applied in order to avoid systematic errors.
wideband systems. This method of coordination can be implemented in bi- and multilateral agreements for coordination for the examined cases. The coordination thresholds for wideband systems in the range of 25 – 32 dBV/m at 3 m height in 25 kHz on one side of the border and the assignment of preferential channel use on the other side of the border leads to a balanced cross-border situation allowing a more efficient use of the spectrum.
Spearman's Rank Correlation Spearman's Rank Correlation Student’s ltl = 6.429 Student’s ltl = 4.570 Stat. Sign. = 100.0% Stat. Sign. = 100.0% Table 32: Values of arbitrarily selected data of car bumper measurements Arbitrarily selected data Arbitrarily selected data Distance [m] Attenuation [linear] Distance [m] Attenuation [linear] HA1 18.5 0.19 HA21 25.8 0.07 VA32 36.7 0.06 VA12 12.4 0.27 VA3 12.3 0.10 VA33 38.0 0.01 HA34 42.6 0.04 HA24 29.0 0.06 VI2 9.5 2.85 HI1 18.5 0.38 VI32 36.7 0.02 VI12 12.4 2.84 HI4 22.8 0.30 VI3 12.3 0.94 HI34 42.6 0.09 HI24 29.0 0.07 VI31 38.8 0.72 VI21 23.1 0.68 HI32 37.2 0.37 HI12 10.8 3.22 HI3 9.5 1.53 HI33 37.2 0.22 VI34 40.5 1.90 VI24 25.8 0.61 HA2 7.3 1.40 VA1 14.4 0.77 HA32 37.2 0.13 HA12 10.8 0.45 VA4 18.5 0.67 HA3 9.5 4.47 VA34 40.5 0.58 VA24 25.8 0.90 HA31 40.5 0.03 HA11 20.2 0.12 VA2 9.5 0.69 VA22 20.4 0.06 VA13 14.6 0.23 VA23 20.4 0.04 HA4 22.8 0.37 HA14 24.1 0.07 HI21 25.8 0.13 HI11 20.2 0.27 HI31 40.5 0.09 VI22 20.4 0.38 VI13 14.6 0.56 VI23 20.4 0.24 HI14 24.1 0.04 VI33 38.0 0.03 VI11 16.5 1.59 VI1 14.4 2.28
HI2 7.3 0.77 HI22 19.4 2.41 HI13 12.4 2.59 HI23 21.8 2.13 VI4 18.5 0.26 VI14 20.2 0.11 VA21 23.1 0.30 VA11 16.5 0.46 VA31 38.8 0.48 HA22 19.4 0.15 HA13 12.4 0.67 HA23 21.8 0.78 VA14 20.2 0.20 HA33 37.2 0.11 Spearman's Rank Correlation ρ = -0.525 Spearman's Rank Correlation ρ = -0.633 Student’s ltl = 3.381 Student’s ltl = 4.480 Stat. Sign. = 99.8% Stat. Sign. = 100.0% For side mirror UWB transmitter positions, the following measurement data are obtained. To differ into two classes, as it is done for the results of bumper position measurements, is useless, because of very poor statistical significance for the NLOS class results. Measurement data from side mirror UWB transmitter positions are in Table 33. Table 33: Measurement data of side mirror measurements Distance [m] Attenuation [linear] 1 MA 16.5 0.79 11 MA 18.3 0.53 21 MA 24.4 0.06 31 MA 39.6 0.12 4 MA 20.7 1.22 14 MA 22.1 0.08 24 MA 27.4 0.77 34 MA 41.5 0.15 1 MI 16.5 0.55 11 MI 18.3 1.16 21 MI 24.4 0.26 31 MI 39.6 0.08 4 MI 20.7 0.69 14 MI 22.1 1.93 24 MI 27.4 0.63 34 MI 41.5 1.66 2 MI 8.4 2.87
DRAFT Proposal – Inclusion of electrolytic iron (billets / flakes) into the Lead Registrant REACH registration dossier of iron Note: Electrolytic iron considered as a new type of iron: Composition of the substance Name: Electrolytic iron Description: Electrolytic iron refers to iron flakes / billets produced by electrolytic refining technologies. It does not include electrolytic iron powders, which are covered by 'Iron Powders' composition. Degree of purity: >= 80.0 — <= 100.0 % (w/w) 14. Constituents Constituent Typical concentration Concentration range Remarks iron EC no.: 231-096-4 >= 90.0 % (w/w) >= 80.0 — <= 100.0 % (w/w) Table 15. Impurities Impurity Typical concentration Concentration range Remarks carbon EC no.: 231-153-3 ca. 0.3 % (w/w) >= 0.0 — 1.0 % (w/w) sulfur EC no.: 231-722-6 ca. 0.4 % (w/w) >= 0.0 — <= 1.5 % (w/w) manganese EC no.: 231-105-1 ca. 5.0 % (w/w) >= 0.0 — <= 20.0 % (w/w) silicon EC no.: 231-130-8 ca. 0.5 % (w/w) >= 0.0 — <= 2.0 % (w/w) phosphorus EC no.: 231-768-7 ca. 0.4 % (w/w) >= 0.0 — <= 1.5 % (w/w) nitrogen EC no.: 231-783-9 ca. 0.05 % (w/w) >= 0.0 — <= 0.8 % (w/w)
11 14/05/18 12 21/05/18 Feedback on AT2 returned 13 28/05/18 Study period 04/06/18 Assessment Task 3 due by Monday 04/06/18, 2pm Examinations 11/06/18 Examinations 18/06/18 References for AFHEA candidates due by Monday 18/06/18, 2pm
any limitations to the interpretation of the project outcomes. Criterion Measures Intended Learning Outcome: Criterion 1 Analysis of the data for themes/results. 4. evaluate the outcomes or data emerging from a higher education project Criterion 2 Identification of key outcomes/findings from the project 4 Criterion 3 Evaluation of how the outcomes meet the project aims Criterion 4 Critical analysis of how the project outcomes address, reflect and/or challenge the current thinking and research in higher education, your teaching practice, and the particular needs of your professional development, institution, colleagues and/or students. 4 Criterion 5 Presentation of project evaluation in appropriate format for dissemination 4 Alignment with the Your commitment to the University’s values will be evident as you discuss the implications of your project outcomes for the institution and your students [V1: Criterion 4]. Depending on the nature of your project and findings, you may also present your thinking regarding the implications of your project for widening participation [V2: Criterion 4] or the community and discipline within which your teaching is delivered [V4: Criterion 4]. Conduct and completion of your project demonstrates your continuing professional development [A5] and commitment to both use evidence-informed approaches and to engage in the creation of evidence through evaluation of practice [V3]. The rubric for this assessment task will be available on MyLO. Task length 2500 words equivalent Due by date 15/10/18
Infusion pumps- volumetric and syringe pumps Intensive care equipment – active respiratory gas humidifier Laser instruments for surgery Medical freezers Medical lighting- operation lamps Monitoring equipment Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Patient warming systems Ultrasound X-ray Key environmental impacts The proposed GPP criteria are designed to reflect the key environmental impacts. This approach is summarised as follows: Key Environmental Impacts GPP Approach Energy usage in the use phase (Ex. Global warming) Water consumption in the use phase, dialysis, disinfectors (Water scarcity) Gas consumption in the use phase, anaesthesia equipment (Ex. Global warming) GWP of refrigerants in medical freezers (Global warming, ozone depletion) Use of materials (Scarcity of resources) Content of hazardous chemicals (Ex. Carcinogenic properties) Social and ethical impacts such as workers’ conditions etc. energy efficient equipment Award automatic low power mode Purchase equipment supplied with performance management instructions Award water efficient dialysis and disinfectant equipment Award low-flow, leak-tested anaesthesia equipment Award medical freezers containing refrigerants with low GWP Award material conscious designed equipment Purchase eco designed equipment Award refurbishment phase out of hazardous substances Purchase equipment that in production fulfills social requirements regarding working conditions, health and safety and decent work standards The order of impacts does not necessarily reflect their importance. EU GPP Criteria for Indoor Lighting The below proposed EU GPP criteria for health care EEE are based on data and information in the Technical Background Report. 3.1 EU GPP criteria for health care EEE
209d 209e 209f 209g 209h 209i 209j 209k 209l Appraisal and Habitats Regulations Assessment Statement 210 Sevenoaks District Council 2009 211 Sevenoaks District Council 2009 212 Sevenoaks District Council 2008 213 Sevenoaks District Council 2013 214 The Planning Inspectorate 2013 215 Sevenoaks District Council 2013 216 Dixon Searle Partnership for Sevenoaks District Council 2012 217 and Dixon Searle Partnership for Sevenoaks District Council 2013 218 URS Corporation Ltd for Sevenoaks District Council 2007 219 URS Corporation Ltd for Sevenoaks District Council 2010 220 URS Corporation Ltd for Sevenoaks District Council 2011 221 URS Corporation Ltd for Sevenoaks District Council 2011 222 URS Corporation Ltd for Sevenoaks District Council 2012 223 Salford University for Sevenoaks District Council 2012 224 URS Corporation Ltd for Sevenoaks District Council 2013 225 Kent County Council 2012 226 Integra for Sevenoaks District Council 2009 227 PMP for Sevenoaks District Council 2009 228 GVA for Sevenoaks District Council 2005 229 GVA for Sevenoaks District Council 2007 230 GVA for Sevenoaks District Council 2009
HDR Coopers Estates (Pro Vision) 05 2014 HDR CPRE 02 2014 HDR Deer Leap Stud Farm (Carter Planning) 01 2014 HDR Kent Downs AONB 04 2014 HDR Warren Court (Robinson Escott) 01 2014 HDR South East Water (DHA Planning) 01 2014 HDR South East Water (DHA Planning) 02 2014 Matter 5 HDR Bartram Farm & Park Lane Kemsing (Ark Projects) 02 2014 HDR Deer Leap Stud Farm (Carter Planning) 02 2014 HDR Egerton Nursery (Crest Nicholson) 01 2014 HDR Florence Farm (Robinson Escott) 01 2014 HDR Main Road Knockholt (Planning & Development) 01 2014 HDR Sevenoaks TC Greatness Cemetery (Evision & Co) 01 2014 Matter 6 HDR Armstrong Kent LLP (CBRE) 06 2014 HDR Armstrong Kent LLP (CBRE) 07 2014 HDR Armstrong Kent LLP (CBRE) 08 2014 HDR Armstrong Kent LLP (CBRE) 09 2014 HDR Armstrong Kent LLP (CBRE) 10 2014 HDR Armstrong Kent LLP (CBRE) 11 2014 HDR Armstrong Kent LLP (CBRE) 12 2014 HDR Armstrong Kent LLP (CBRE) 13 2014 HDR Armstrong Kent LLP (CBRE) 14 2014 HDR Armstrong Kent LLP (CBRE) 15 2014 HDR Armstrong Kent LLP (CBRE) 16 2014 HDR Armstrong Kent LLP (CBRE) 17 2014 HDR Armstrong Kent LLP (CBRE) 18 2014 HDR Armstrong Kent LLP (CBRE) 19 2014
Communicating with the public throughout a nuclear or radiological emergency 3.2.69-3.2.75 Requirement 13 Taking protective actions and other response actions 3.2.76-3.2.83 Requirement 14 Managing radioactive in a nuclear or radiological emergency 3.2.84-3.2.88 Requirement 15 Mitigating non-radiological consequences of a nuclear or radiological emergency and of an emergency response 3.2.89-3.2.92 Requirement 16 Requesting, providing and receiving international assistance for emergency preparedness and response 3.2.93-3.2.94 Requirement 17 Terminating a nuclear or radiological emergency 3.2.95-3.2.101 Requirement 18 Analysing the nuclear or radiological emergency and the emergency response Requirement 19 Authorities for emergency preparedness and response 3.3.1-3.3.6 Requirement 20 Organisation and staffing for emergency preparedness and response 3.3.7-3.3.11 Requirement 21 Coordination of emergency preparedness and response 3.3.12-3.3.15 Requirement 22 Plans and procedures for emergency response 3.3.16-3.3.21 Requirement 23 Logistical support and facilities for emergency response 3.3.22-3.3.27 Requirement 24 Training, drills and exercises for emergency preparedness and response 3.3.28-3.3.33 Requirement 25 Quality management program for emergency preparedness and response 3.3.34-3.3.39 Requirement 26
Vc. INDUSTRIAL/SECTORAL PARTNERSHIPS In this Section (maximum three pages narrative, plus Tables as indicated below), describe the industrial and/or sectoral partnerships for the proposed Center. In the proposal development stage, it is expected that each proposed Center has talked to 40 potential partners (both national and regional) to gain a more complete understanding of the Development Challenge, what aspects of the Development Challenge can be addressed, the skills gaps, and the applied research needs. What key concepts emerged from these consultations, and what role did the partners play in the development of the proposal? While partners may evolve over the lifetime of the proposed Center, it is expected that the leadership of the proposed Center should have secured upfront commitments from a reasonable number of relevant partners prior to the submission of the proposal. In addition to providing the names of these committed companies and/or partner organizations, describe why these organizations were selected as partners, and comment on the benefits of the partnership to both the proposed Center and the partner. These partners should include national, regional and (where relevant) international companies and/or sectoral stakeholders. Describe the model for engagement with partners, and comment on the results from any existing partnerships that are relevant to the goals of the proposed Center. Each Center is expected to have an Industrial Liaison Officer, who is charged with maintaining and building partnerships. Furthermore, each proposed Center is expected to develop a detailed plan for financial support from its partners (e.g. for support of research costs, short course delivery, testing, equipment). Describe the planned model for the implementation of the partnerships. It is expected that partners will help define: The applied research projects and research themes of the proposed center The skills needs and curricula in current/new M.S. and Ph.D. programs, and The short courses that will be offered to mid-career professionals. In addition, partners are expected to offer internships for students (and potentially faculty members), and to hire some graduates from the proposed Center. Comment on the strategy that the proposed Center will employ to ensure students have the opportunity for internships as part of their training. Table: Industrial Advisory Board (tentative) All Africa Centers of Excellence are expected to maintain an Industrial Advisory Board (IAB), composed of regional industry and sectoral leaders in the sector of the proposed Center. In the Table below, identify up to seven (7) proposed members of this Board, and comment on their expertise and anticipated contributions and/or roles.
Notify local authorities (PAZ and UPZ) after classification a <15min <15min <1h Fully activate emergency organisation <2 h <6 h <12 h <2 h <6 h <2 h Notify all States within the UPZ <1 h <1 h <1 h Notify the IAEA <2 h <2 h Performing mitigatory actions (the objective is timed from the time at which the emergency is classified) Initiate mitigatory actions <15 min <15 min <15 min Have operational support centre functional <30 min Provide technical assistance to the on-site responders (activate technical support centre) <1 h Provide on-site damage control teams <30 min <1 h <1 h Obtain support of off-site emergency services <30 min <30 min <30 min Taking urgent protective action Recommend urgent protective actions for the public on the basis of the emergency classification <30 min <30 min Make decisions on urgent protective actions <30 min <30 min <30 min <30 min Complete implementation of facility protective actions <1 h <1 h <1 h
Aid for environmental studies [70] % [60] % [50]% Aid for adaptation to future Union standards more than 3 years between 1 and 3 years before the entry into force [20] % [15]% [15] % [10] % [10] % [5]% Aid for management [55] % [45] % [35]% Aid for renewable energies Aid for cogeneration installations [65] %, [100] % if bidding process [55] %, [100] % if bidding process [45] %, [100] % if bidding process Aid for energy-efficiency [40] %, [100] % if bidding process [30] %, [100] % if bidding process [20] %, [100] % if bidding process Aid for district heating and cooling using conventional energy [65] %, [100] % if bidding process [55] %, [100] % if bidding process [45]% [100] % if bidding process Aid the remediation of contaminated sites [100]% [100]% [100]% Aid in the form of tradable permits [100]% [100]% [100]% Aid for energy infrastructure [100]% [100]% [100]% Aid for CCS [100]% [100]% [100]% To the aid intensities mentioned may be increased by a bonus of [5]% point in regions covered by Article 107(3)c or by a bonus of [15]% in regions covered by Article 107(3)a Treaty up to a maximum of 100% aid intensity. Annex 2 Typical State interventions The Commission considers typical examples of State aid interventions to increase the level of environmental protection or strengthen the internal energy market. In particular, for the calculation of the eligible costs on the basis of a counterfactual scenario the following guidance is provided: Aid category Counterfactual / Eligible costs CHP The investment for the additional equipment needed for the installation to operate as a cogeneration installation Environmental Studies The eligible are the costs of the studies. Remediation contaminated sites The costs incurred for the remediation work, less the increase in the value of the land. District heating and cooling The investment costs for the construction, expansion, refurbishment of one or more generation units which shall be an integral part of the efficient district heating and cooling system. Waste management The cost of conventional production not involving waste management with the same capacity investment.
Cash Book Name of BMC _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Receipt Side Payment Side Receipt Date Receipt No. Particulars (Name of Depositor etc.) Amount Accounting Date Payment Date Certificate No. & Date Particulars Amount Accounting Head Cash Bank Cash Bank (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) Closing Blance Total Total Annexure 18 Bank Reconciliation Statement For the Month of_____________________________ Name of Office ___________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________
Niam Hassan Guyana Marketing Corporation (GMC) Patrick Ketwarn UG Grace Paris G.S.A. Andrea Mendonca GNBS Wilmot Granett Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture (IICA), Guyana Maxime Parrish -Aaron Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture (IICA), Guyana maxime.parrish
PRIORITY Gold Standard Measure Who will do it Outcome Priority 1 Identify people most at risk of domestic violence and prevent homelessness 1 Corporate Health and Wellbeing Board Homelessness Partnership Victims of domestic violence have access to advice and homelessness interventions. Priority 2 Improve housing advice and support for people living in areas 2 SEET needs 3 Options Economic and Community Development Policy Development and Scrutiny Panel Homelessness Partnership JCP/ VCS Training and Education Providers Registered Social Landlords Low income and workless have access to good quality education, volunteering and employment opportunities and needs are included in corporate Economic Strategy. People with mental or physical difficulty get positive message about getting into work. Priority 3 Target mortgage rescue advice and assistance at low income households 7 MR Scheme Supporting People and Communities Low income mortgagors have access to advice and interventions. Priority 4 Target welfare advice at low income households living in social housing 2 SEET needs Supporting People and Communities Homelessness Partnership Housing Services Low income social housing tenants have access to advice and interventions. Single people as well as families in need are a comprehensive prevention service, steps to improve the service through Peer-led Practitioner Prevention Partnership developed by the National Homelessness Advice Service. Priority 5 Prevent evictions of social housing tenants in the first year of new tenancies 2 SEET needs Registered Providers (Curo) Housing Services New social housing tenants have access to first year tenancy advice and interventions. Pre-eviction protocols reviewed. Homesearch applicants have access to Enhanced Housing Options Services Priority 6 Review the distribution and tenant 5 Pathways Registered Providers (Curo) Housing Services Family sized and retirement social housing mapped and gapped. Older people’s housing aspirations understood.
Yarralin Pigeon Hole Ngukurr (RSD) Ngukurr Ngukurr Rittarangu Numbulwar (RSD) Numbulwar Numbulwar Wugularr (Beswick) Bulman Wugularr/Barunga Bulman Weemol Barunga Manyallaluk Wugularr (Beswick) Angurugu (RSD) Angurugu Angurugu Nhulunbuy Galiwin’ku (RSD) Galiwin’ku Galiwin’ku Milingimbi (RSD) Milingimbi Milingimbi Gapuwiyak (RSD) Gapuwiyak Gapuwiyak Ramingining Ramingining Ramingining Umbakumba (RSD) Umbakumba Milyakburra Umbakumba Milyakburra Yirrkala (RSD) Yirrkala Yirrkala Gunyangara Proposed locations for GECs & IEOs Stronger Futures – Southern Region
Yarralin Pigeon Hole Ngukurr (RSD) Ngukurr Ngukurr Rittarangu Numbulwar (RSD) Numbulwar Numbulwar Wugularr (Beswick) Bulman Wugularr/Barunga Bulman Weemol Barunga Manyallaluk Wugularr (Beswick) Angurugu (RSD) Angurugu Angurugu Nhulunbuy Galiwin’ku (RSD) Galiwin’ku Galiwin’ku Milingimbi (RSD) Milingimbi Milingimbi Gapuwiyak (RSD) Gapuwiyak Gapuwiyak Ramingining Ramingining Ramingining Umbakumba (RSD) Umbakumba Milyakburra Umbakumba Milyakburra Yirrkala (RSD) Yirrkala Yirrkala Gunyangara Proposed locations for GECs & IEOs Stronger Futures – Southern Region
GEC locations IEO locations communities in cluster ICC Alice Springs: GEC Mentor Alice Springs: IEO Mentor Springs Alice Springs X 2 Springs Town Camps Amoonguna Imanpa Mutitjulu Kaltukatjara (Docker River) Mutitjulu Kaltukatjara (Docker River) Imanpa Lajamanu (RSD) Lajamanu Lajamanu Ntaria (RSD) (Hermannsburg) Ntaria Areyonga Ntaria (Hermannsburg) Areyonga Wallace Rockhole Papunya Papunya Kintore Papunya Kintore Ikuntji (Haasts Bluff) Mt Liebig Santa Teresa Santa Teresa Titjikala Apatula (Finke) Santa Teresa Titjikala Apatula (Finke) Ti Tree Willowra Yuelamu Laramba Willowra Yuelamu Laramba Ti Tree Jutunta Nturiya Yuendumu (RSD) Yuendumu Yuendumu Nyirripi Ali Curung Ali Curung Ali Curung Tara Imangara Tennant Engawala Utopia Homelands Alpurrurulam Utopia Homelands Ampilatwatja Alpurrurulam Engawala Atitjere (Harts Range) Nil GEC – TNC ICC to manage Elliott Elliott Owairtilla (Canteen Creek) Wutunugurra (Epenarra) NOTE: Total number of GEC positions: 32 (including 2 mentor positions) Total number of IEO locations: 54 (including 2 mentor positions) The following communities will not have a GEC or IEO presence and will be managed by the Katherine ICC: Binjari Kybrook Farm Katherine town camps
Dwelling Fire Intervention Standard We will mobilise two fire engines to dwelling fires, the first fire engine will be in attendance within the following times, on a minimum 90% of occasions: High Risk 8 minutes Medium Risk Areas 12 minutes Low Risk Areas 20 minutes A second fire engine is also mobilised to all dwelling fires, to be in attendance at the incident within 5 minutes of the first fire engine arriving, on 80% of occasions. Road Traffic Collision Intervention Standard We will mobilise two fire engines to Road Traffic Collision incidents, the first fire engine will be in attendance within 15 minutes, on a minimum 90% of occasions for all Risk Areas. The way that we ensure we meet our Intervention Standards is constantly review, to ensure that we meet them in the most efficient and effective way possible. Any efficiency proposals implemented during the life of this plan will only be considered if they do not compromise our ability to achieve our intervention standards. 5. Managing the Risks Facing our Communities The intelligence that we gather helps us, in partnership with our local communities, partner agencies and other stakeholders to prepare our plans and strategies in order to locate the most appropriate resources in the right areas at the right time. The following information describes how we employ our resources to make our communities safer. Prevention - Community Safety Activities We know life’s not always predictable – Get ready for the unexpected, we do! We aim to help support everyone who is able to take responsibility for their own safety and provide the resources to make those less able as safe as possible. We will provide advice which, if followed, will reduce the risk of fires and other emergencies happening. If necessary we will also visit you and may supply you with smoke detectors or a domestic sprinkler system, to make you and your family safer from any fire in your home. Our Community Safety and Inclusion Strategy describes our intent to provide prevention and protection activities for all individuals, whatever they may be doing, at every stage of their life. These activities are based upon the risk in a geographical area, or the risk to an individual or individual households due to their personal circumstances. In the most cost effective way possible we aim to: Reduce the incidence and impact of fire and other emergencies. Continually improve public safety and wellbeing.
Disability Employment Services Deed Clauses: Clause 79 – Program Services Location Clause 83 – Direct Registration of Participants without a Referral Clause 88 – Initial Contacts Clause 89 – Contact Services Clause 91 – Assistance for Participants Clause 93 - Wage Subsidy and Employment Assistance Fund Clause 100 – Job in Jeopardy Participants Clause 103 – Entry into Ongoing Support Clause 104 – Obligation to provide Ongoing Support Clause 117 – Exits Clause 121 – Service Fees Clause 125 – Ongoing Support Fees Clause 126 – Job in Jeopardy Fees Clause 129 – Ancillary Payments Annexure A Definitions – ‘Job in Jeopardy Outcome’, ‘Job in Jeopardy Non-Payable Outcome’ Annexure B1 – Disability Employment Services – Disability Management Service Fees Annexure B2 – Disability Employment Services – Employment Support Services Fees Reference documents relevant to these guidelines: Direct Registration Guidelines Referral and Commencement Guidelines Creating and Updating an Employment Pathway Plan Guidelines Documentary Evidence for Claims for Payment Guidelines Exits Guidelines Ongoing Support Guidelines Ongoing Support Assessment Allocation Guidelines Explanatory Note: All capitalised have the same meaning as in the Disability Employment Services Deed. In this document, “must” means that compliance is mandatory and “should” means that compliance represents best practice.
5. The DES provider Conduct Initial Interview, complete EPP and Commence JiJ Participant. Disability Employment Services Deed Clause References: Clause 83.5 Clause 88 Clause 89.1 Clause 96 Initial Interview The DES provider must conduct an Initial Interview with a registered JiJ Participant as soon as possible. Details of the JiJ Participant’s Employment, including their current and normal hours of Employment as provided in the Employer Form, must be recorded on Employment Services IT Systems before the JiJ Participant can be commenced. Employment Pathway Plan The DES provider must also complete an Employment Pathway Plan (EPP) with the JiJ Participant, detailing the assistance that the DES provider will deliver including the schedule of Contacts, and the activities that the JiJ Participant will undertake to help retain current Employment. The JiJ Participant cannot be commenced until the DES provider has entered details of the signed EPP on Employment Services IT Systems. Commencing the JiJ Participant obtaining the documentary evidence detailed in Section 4, conducting the Initial Interview and completing the EPP, the Provider must Commence the JiJ Participant in the Employment Assistance phase of either the Disability Management Service or Employment Support Service. The fees available for a JiJ Participant are the same in both programs.
Children, young people and parents will play a key role in reviewing and developing services – particularly those specifically for children and young people with special educational needs and disabilities Seek feedback and comments on local services local offer Report annually on the feedback received on the local offer and what we are doing to address issues raised Promote coproduction from individual planning right through to strategic planning
Children or young people with additional needs should be offered full access to a broad, balanced and relevant education, based on the National Curriculum and, for pre-school children, the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) curriculum Develop a continuum of support and services that support children and young people achieve agreed learning outcomes Ensure our Accessibility Strategy is published, available and reviewed as needed Improve access to information and training to support education providers to manage medical conditions in school Provide challenge and a solution focus via the Vulnerable Cohort Groups Make better use of data and improve intelligence across agencies to champion access to opportunities for all children and young people
Transition arrangements between different phases of education or agencies working with children and young people are in place to ensure assessments, plans and reviews are shared appropriately and families know who is taking over the coordination of their child’s support Coordinate with developments within Building Better Lives Coordinate the gathering of transition arrangements from service areas and make that information available to help young people, parents and practitioners understand transition activities they can reasonable expect
If this agreement ends for any reason and you continue to have health needs, the funding for your health needs will be provided by the CCG as part of the NHS. 12. Data Protection and Use of Data We may information that we hold or become aware of with other statutory agencies for the prevention of fraud and abuse. 13. Signatures This is where all parties are signing up to this agreement. This means that we will all work to what has been agreed in this document. 1st Party: Us – Signature on behalf of the Clinical Commissioning Group: Signature: ____________________________________ Date: ________________________________________ 2nd Party: You – The person receiving the Personal Health Budget Signature: ____________________________________ Date: ________________________________________ 3rd Party:
Broker (Where applicable) – The person who will provide oversight and management as well as recive the moneys into a bank account in the patients name. Signature: ____________________________________ Date: ________________________________________ 4th Representative – the person receiving and managing the Personal Health Budget on behalf of the above named person Signature: ____________________________________ Date: ________________________________________
Table 10. Comparison of agricultural land use group median loading rates by Kruskal-Wallace test Group Median (lb/ac/yr) Parameter Pathway Corn, grain–fall fallow Corn, sm. grain Corn, silage–fall fallow Corn, silage–fall sm. grain Corn, unspecified Corn-soybean rotation Cotton, cotton rotation Fallow-bare soil Forage, Nonlegumes Forage, legume Misc. rotation Mixture Soybean, full season fall fallow Past. cropland and Pasture Small Grain–fallow Sm Grain–forage established Wheat rotation Misc. rotation TP Surface 0.95 ad 1.16 ade 1.29 a 0.97 ac 1.22 a 0.54 ac 0.25 be 0.12 b 1.70 a 0.30 bce 0.51 cd TN Surface 16.33 a 13.61 a 1.96 b 0.62 de 0.54 ce 5.13 b 1.78 bcd NO3 Shallow gw 16.75 a 1.90 bd 1.98 bc 7.69 c 3.28 bc 6.16 cd Surface 1.59 c 2.94 ac 3.84 ae 2.89 ad 1.50 c 0.21 f 3.48 b 0.77 cdf 0.08 f 0.13 f Tile drain 29.05 a 15.26 ab 0.89 b 29.44 a TSS Surface 206.5 cd 3192.2 a 1490.8 a 95.6 cde 55.4 e 258.7 abcde 638.4 b Total sed. Surface 889.5 a 215.9 ac 138.3 cd 34.8 bd 331.0 ad Note: Within rows, group medians followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different, P < 0.05.
Health and Medical Supplies for Children and Adults with Functional Needs Diapers Walmart – local store manager Target – local store manager Dillons – local store manager Walgreens – local store manager CVS – local store manager Infant formula Walmart – local store manager Target – local store manager Dillons – local store manager Walgreens – local store manager CVS – local store manager Children’s food Walmart – local store manager Target – local store manager Dillons – local store manager Walgreens – local store manager CVS – local store manager Pharmaceuticals/Medicine Pharmaceutical Prime Vendor: Morris & Dickson Co LLC Kansas Contract Number: 12744 Medical Supplies Contract: McKesson Medical-Surgical Minnesota Kansas Contract Number: 0000000000000000000037646 Pharmacy Services: Iola Pharmacy Inc Kansas Contract Number 0000000000000000000037083 Pharmacy Contractor: Diamond Pharmacy Services Kansas Contract Number: 07297A Medical Equipment/Supplies Medical Supplies Contract: World Medical Government Solutions LLC
In order to respond to latest changes in the mathematical landscape, including the latest inspection framework, we will ensure that: Maths provision and impact on learners is evaluated and reviewed regularly via the School Improvement Plan and aligned maths action plan. As part of this process, the maths subject-leader (alongside other senior leaders) will triangulate evidence from a range of monitoring activities (e.g. planning/book scrutinies, learning walks/observations and pupil voice) to determine next stages of development. CPD needs of our staff, including the maths subject-leader and teaching assistants, are regularly reviewed and planned as appropriate. The expectation is that staff attending CPD will be given planned opportunities to cascade key messages, or share through lesson study. Last reviewed: _______________ Date of next review: _______________ Signed: _______________ (Chair of Governors) In addition to the above, some schools may also wish to consider the following issues, identifying those that may need further explanation in their policy: Any instance where school approaches differ or extend from that of the new national curriculum, e.g. use of a specific programme to teach maths or extended outdoor learning opportunities, etc. Roles of responsibility, including those of any linked Governor and SENCO. Meeting the needs of those with SEN, the most-able, or those with EAL. ICT and mathematics, e.g. use of specific hardware and software to support learners. Homework, also in reference to a separate policy where applicable. The school’s perceived ‘non-negotiables’ in relation to the learning environment, e.g. working walls. Whether the school is currently trialling new approaches, such as a maths mastery approach to learning.
Code of Corporate Governance Under “Our Procedures” No Code of practice for recording SCRCA Meetings “Code of Practice for Recording Meetings” No CA and LEP Members’ Code of Conduct Under “Our Procedures” No Procedure for considering complaints alleging failure to comply with the Members’ Code of Conduct Under “Our Procedures” No Code of Conduct for Officers at page 98 No Provision of Services Guide for dealing with FOI requests Under “Our Procedures” No Employment of Staff Staff are employed by Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council. Attendance Policy BMBC No Counter-fraud information BMBC & SCC No Disciplinary, Conduct and Capability Policy BMBC No Employee Equality & Diversity Policy BMBC No Grievance Policy BMBC No Health & Safety Policy BMBC No Whistleblowing Policy BMBC No Records Management & Personal Data Information Security “Our Data Protection & Security” No Data Protection Policy Under “Our Data Protection & Security” No Lists and registers. Information held in registers required by law and other lists and registers relating to the functions of the authority. Publication Format Fee Registers open to public inspection We do not hold any such registers No Asset lists and information asset register We do not hold any information covered by the Re-use of Public Sector Information Regulations 2005 No Register of Members’ Interests Under “Our Procedures” No Register of Members’ Gifts & Hospitality Under “Our Procedures” No Declarations of Interest made at meetings Under “Our Procedures” No The services we offer.
Table 1: Capacity Development 4.0 framework Target/Level Individual Organisational System Resources Education Human Resources Laws, regulations and reference frameworks Work experience Budget Funds infrastructure Infrastucture (physical assets, IT, etc.) (NSDS, sectoral…) Existing data Institutional infrastructure Skills & Knowledge Technical skills Methods, practices and QC Data literacy Work Standards and regulations Autonomy & problem solving Innovation Creative thinking Management Talent management Strategic planning NSS co-ordination Time management and prioritisation Organisational design Data Ecosystem Leadership HR Management Advocacy strategy Strategic thinking Transparency Politics & Power Teamwork & collaboration Change management Relationship between producers Relationship bet. producers and users Communication & negotiation skills Workplace politics Institutional autonomy Accountability Strategic networking Fundraising strategies Policy preferences
support music and measure the trends on a yearly basis. 18 Work with other national, state and city-based agencies to gather data and research the industry. Work with the National Live Music Office and other capital cities on research projects that are nationally focused and other joint projects covering common issues to gather data and better understand the economic and cultural value of live music in Melbourne and Australia.
The following also participated in the A1 Subcommittee Meetings: Baruch BenAmi Netafim Casey Cady California Department of Food and Agriculture John Davids Oakdale Irrigation District Hicham Eltal Merced Irrigation District Aaron Fukuda Tulare Irrigation District Bruce Gwynne California Department of Conservation Dan Johnson USDA Gary Kienlen MBK Engineers Tim O’Halloran Yolo County Flood Water Conservation District Todd Manley Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District Anjanette Shadley Martin Western Canal Water District Todd Rinkenberger Netafim Spreck Rosekrans Environmental Defense Fund Blake Sanden UC Davis Cooperative Extension Mario Santoyo Friant Water Authority Robert Siegfried Santa Clara Valley Water District Brandon Souza Agricultural Water Management Council Stacey Sullivan Sustainable Conservation David Zoldoske California Water Institute Table of Contents
5.4 Quantification of Efficiency of Agricultural Water Use Reports Data used and the results of the quantification of the agricultural water use efficiency would be reported as described in Table 5-5. Table 5-5 Data elements, schedule, and responsible entity reports Data element Schedule Responsible entity report Regional Regional values of Etc, Pe, ETAW, Kc, AN, EN, RF, AW, CCUF, AWUF, TWUF, WMF, mean and standard deviation of scale DUs, field information on crop, irrigation method, and acreage, and county and statewide values of PAW, VAW and description of all assumptions CWPs after the legislative authority and sources of funding are established California Plan Update Supplier scale Supplier scale values of Etc, Pe, ETAW, Kc, AW, AN, EN, RF, WS, FGD, TWS, CCUF, AWUF,TWUF, WMF,DF, mean and standard deviation of field scale DUs, and information on crop, irrigation method, and acreage. AWMPs after the legislative authority and sources of funding are established Agricultural Water Supplier’s Agricultural Water Management Plan Field scale Field scale values of Etc, Pe, ETAW, Kc, AW, AN, EN, CCUF, AWUF,TWUF, mean and standard deviation of field scale DUs, and information on crop, irrigation method, and acreage. AWMPs after the legislative authority and sources of funding are established Agricultural Water Supplier’s Agricultural Water Management Plan 5.5 Data Management DWR recommends that the results of the quantification of efficiency of agricultural water use when submitted to DWR be maintained by DWR and disseminated through the Water Plan Update and other DWR planning and educational documents. DWR will maintain these data in an expanded database to be developed by DWR for the SB X7-7. SB X7-7 requires DWR to develop a standardized data reporting form water suppliers may use to submit water use data to agencies.
Table of Contents Attendees NMPG First Name Last Name Institution = Present AT Mr. Stefan Ribisch Unicredit AT Ms. Karin Wachter Unicredit BE Ms. Veronique Peeters BNY Mellon CH Mr. Michael Blumer Credit Suisse DE Mr Schaefer Daniel HSBC Excused DK Ms Ravn Charlotte VP Securities A/S ES Ms. Cinta Cristobal BBVA Excused ES Mrs Diego Garcia DB FI Ms Rask Sari Nordea Bank Plc FR Mr Jean-Pierre Klak Statestreet GR Ms. Angela Katopodi Eurobank HK IT Ms Deantoni Paola SGSS spa JP Mr Hideki Ito Mizuho Bank JP Mr Hisashi Hotta Mizuho Bank
Question: What is the normal of PROR in the other markets? DE Input To clarify, if I I understood correctly. If an instruction for 100 has been sent, and the pro rata rate is 45%, then the question is if 45 shares have been accepted for the offer or 55 shares (reduction rate). I have, unfortunately, not been able to adress this question during the last NMPG meeting. However, to the best of my knowledge, in Germany the pro-rata-rate is the rate to be applied to the number (i.e. not a reduction rate), which would mean that, in the above example, 45 shares would be tendered. Item is postponed to next call due to lack of time. Action: Remaining NMPGs to provide feedback at next call. ------------------------ End of the Meeting Minutes ---------------