Interpretation of a Motion to Adopt A motion to approve this submission means that the editing instructions and any changed or added material are actioned in the TGax Draft. This introduction is not part of the adopted material. Editing instructions formatted like this are intended to be copied into the TGax Draft (i.e. they are instructions to the 802.11 editor on how to merge the text with the baseline documents). TGax Editor: Editing instructions preceded by “TGax Editor” are instructions to the TGax editor to modify existing material in the TGax draft. As a result of adopting the changes, the TGax editor will execute the instructions rather than copy them to the TGax Draft. CIDs 3031 Patil 70.04 A TWT Scheduling STA that is responding to a TWT request to setup a wake TBTT will see the TBTT Negotiation subfield value to 1. Also see section 27.7.3.4 (pg 186, line 48) Change the sentence to say that a TWT scheduling STA that is responding to a TWT request to setup a wake TBTT shall set the value of TBTT Negotiated subfield to 1. Revise – deleting the sentence is logically equivalent, simpler and easier to understand, as the fields have the same meaning when the Wake TBTT Negotiation bit is set to 1, regardless of whether requesting, responding, scheduled or scheduling STA sets the bit. TGax editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r0 that are marked with CID 3031. 3123 Adrian 69.28 802.11ah defines the TWT element as extensible. .11ax indicates that the body of the element can be repeated for Broadcast, and presumably relies on the Length to determine the number Change the element ID definition to indicate it is not extensible, or add a count subfield in the Control field. Revise – TGax editor to make changes as shown in 11-17/0777r0 that are marked with CID 3123 0 0
description of using temporary channel in an HE STA 5769 Hanseul Hong 75.24 It says "A TWT requesting STA sets the TWT Protection subfield to if TWT protection by RAW allocation is not requested for the corresponding TWT(s)". However, an HE STA, TWT Protection subfield may be set to 1 to enable the NAV protection by 802.11ax. Delete the sentence or change 'A TWT requesting STA' to 'A S1G TWT requesting STA' Revise – generally agree with comment - TGax editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r0 that are marked with CID 5769. 5832 Huizhao Wang 69.64 Paragraph starting from line 64 is completely incomprehencable. It seems trying to describe the TWT element with broadcast = 1, how to determine the wake TBTT and listen interval, but it has failed to describe it clearly Add graphs, and equations to show how to calculate the next wake TBTT and listen intervals between beacons Reject – the information here is complete and concise as a description of the field. It is not intended to provide the commenter’s requested behavioral descsription, the exact use of these fields is found in 27.7.3.4, which is already referenced here. 5833 Huizhao Wang 69.31 Target Wake Time field size should be either 8 or 2 octects Change "8 or 0" to "8 or 2" Revise – other changes have caused a separate diagram to be created, so the change is effected in spirit, but differently than suggested - TGax editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r0 that are marked with CID 5833. 0 0 0
5834 Huizhao Wang 70.34 The description for TWT Setup command of Request TWT is not clear. It should just simply say that for Request TWT command, the Target Wake Time field should be set to zero. Replace the text: "The Target Wake Time of the TWT element contains 0s as the TWT responding STA specifies the target wake time value for this case,". With following simple text: "Target Wake Time field shall set to zero." Reject – the group has this language in place because when the language was not present, there were questions about how there could be a request without providing a TWT Time value in the request and the language certainly does not make things more difficult to understand, but rather, provides an explanation that clears up the question of why 0s is appropriate. 5835 Huizhao Wang 73.16 Deliver sounding feedback in TWT SP time may impact the performance of HE TxBF. The sounding feedback carries the channel matrix information of the moment of sounding NDP is received, need to timely delivered to the beamformer without delay, so using TWT SP time to deliver it will likely cause extra delays. Remove: "Frames that are sent as part of a sounding feedback exchange (see 27.6 (HE sounding protocol))" Reject – nothing in the statements here suggest that the sounding frames were sent at any significant time preceding the delivery of the feedback. It is much more probable that the TWT is for PS STA which are only waking at the TWT SP and therefore, the sounding PPDUs are transmitted in the same TWT SP as the feedback. Even if sounding were in one SP and FB in a later one, that is an implementation choice. 5836 Huizhao Wang 73.42 Deliver sounding feedback in TWT SP time may impact the performance of HE TxBF. The sounding feedback carries the channel matrix information of the moment of sounding NDP is received, need to timely delivered to the beamformer remove: "Frames that are sent as part of a sounding feedback exchange (see 27.6 (HE sounding protocol))" Reject – nothing in the statements here suggest that the sounding frames were sent at any significant time preceding the delivery of the feedback. It is much more probable that the TWT is for PS STA 0 0 0 zero
expectations of future events and as evidenced by the commenter’s lack of a decent alternative, there seems to be no word in the English language that would make a decent substitute for “expects” in thi case 6356 John Coffey 74.21 Inconsistent usage / "wicked which": here we have "which corresponds", whereas in most other places in the draft we have "that corresponds". Change "which" to "that". Revise – generally agree with comment - TGax editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r0 that are marked with CID 6356. 6357 John Coffey 74.27 Inconsistent usage / "wicked which": here we have "which corresponds", whereas in most other places in the draft we have "that corresponds". Change to "that". Revise – generally agree with comment - TGax editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r0 that are marked with CID 6357. 6358 John Coffey 74.36 Independent clauses linked by a without a coordinating conjunction. Change comma to semicolon. Revise – generally agree with comment - TGax editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r0 that are marked with CID 6358. 6359 John Coffey 74.43 Superfluous comma: ", is not present". Delete Revise – generally with comment - TGax editor shall make the changes shown in that are marked with CID 6359. 6360 John Coffey 74.59 Missing "BSS.The". Add space. Revise – generally agree with comment - TGax editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r0 that are marked with CID 6360.
either or 8 octets only. editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r0 that are marked with CID 7361. 7362 Kwok Shum Au 74.25 For the sentence "When a TWT responding STA or a TWT scheduling STA with to transmits a TWT element to the TWT requesting STA ...", it means is required. However, cannot be found in this amendment (11ax D1.0), 11mc Draft 8.0 or 11ah Draft 10.0. Add in subclause C.3. Revise –generally agree with comment - TGax editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r0 that are marked with CID 7362. 7551 Liwen Chu 74.04 Change to "In a TWT element transmitted by a TWT requesting or scheduled STA, the TWT wake interval is equal to the average time that the TWT requesting STA or TWT scheduled STA expects to elapse between successive TWT SPs." As in comment Revise –generally agree with comment - TGax editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r0 that are marked with CID 7551. 7553 Liwen Chu 74.55 temorary primary channel? As in comment Reject – nothing can be found in the draft which matches the description. 7598 Liwen Chu 73.04 Add Ack/BA as the responding frame from scheduled STA. It makes no sense to only do sounding without data frame transmission. As in comment Revise –generally with comment - TGax editor shall make the changes shown in that are marked with CID 7598.
marked with CID 7926. 7927 Mark RISON 71.30 There can be no TWT request to accept since a scheduled STA cannot make a request (see 70.35) Change the cell to "N/A" Reject – the accept outcome is also used to accept a suggest or demand. 7928 Mark RISON 71.33 It says "(See" in the 4th column Change to "(see" Accept – TGax editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r0 that are marked with CID 7928. 7929 Mark RISON 73.22 "There are no restrictions on the frames transmitted by the schedul- ing STA of the broadcast TWT SP." -- but the scheduling STA is the AP, so the next para does introduce restrictions Delete the cited text; also at line 49. Also fix at line 56 to only refer to the scheduled STA Revise – generally agree with comment - TGax editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r0 that are marked with CID 7929. 7930 Mark RISON 73.09 "Feedback can be contained is the QoS Control field or in the HE variant HT Control field of the frame, " -- a PS-Poll cannot carry either At line 8 and line 33 change "PS-Poll and QoS Null frames" to "QoS Null frames and PS-Poll frames contained in Control Wrapper frames" Revise – generally with comment - TGax editor shall make the changes shown in that are marked with CID 7930. 7931 Mark RISON 73.45 There are 3 instances of "(Re-)Association" in the document Change each to "(Re)Association" Accept 7932 Mark RISON 73.58 There are 2 instances of "FILS discovery frame" in the document Change each to "FILS Discovery frame" Accept
8131 Matthew Fischer 70.34 Too many of the entries for column "Description when transmitted by a TWT scheduling STA, Wake TBTT Negotiation subfield = 1" have "NA" - according to Table 10-19a--TWT setup exchange command interpretation, there should be more entries with something other than NA here. Reconcile the table in 9.4.2.200 TWT element with Table 10-19a--TWT setup exchange command interpretation - noting that Table 10-19a is the more correct one. Revise – generally agree with comment - TGax editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r0 that are marked with CID 8131. 8144 Matthew Fischer 69.36 The TWT Channel should be or 1 because for bTWT, the TWT channel is not present Change the TWT Channel octet count in figure TWT element format to read "0 or 1" instead of "1" Revise – other changes have caused a separate diagram to be created, so the change is effected in spirit, but differently than suggested - TGax editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r0 that are marked with CID 8144. 8195 Osama 69.22 there may be a numbering issue. 9.4.2.200 in 11ah is assigned to TSF Timer Accuracy element. May need to change the numbering for TWT element as in comment. Reject – it’s 200 8196 Osama 69.30 Comparing the IE in Figure 9-589av to the one in 11ah draft, it seems that this TWT element is a new element by adding Broadcast TWT ID. The question is; is this a new IE? If not then I don't understand what format is now used for ah clarify Reject – the text explains the difference, in that the Broadcast bit is reserved for S1G, and it explains how the format changes dependent on the value of the Broadcast subfield. Between these two facts, the format for each case should be clear.
9343 Tomoko Adachi 73.14 Wrong reference number. Change "25.14" to "27.13" and update the of the subclause in brackets. Revise – generally agree with the commenter, TGax editor to note that no change is necessary at this point in time as D1.2 already has the problem fixed per CID 4727. 9344 Tomoko Adachi 73.40 Wrong reference number. Change "25.14" to "27.13" and update the title of the subclause in brackets. Revise – generally agree with the commenter, TGax editor to note that no change is necessary at this point in time as D1.2 already has the problem fixed per CID 4727. 9843 Young Hoon Kwon 69.63 It is not clear the meaning when the Wake TBTT Negotiation subfield is set to or 1. Need further clarification. As in the comment. Revise – generally agree with comment - TGax editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r0 that are marked with CID 9843. 9844 Young Hoon Kwon 73.30 Typo: STAT -> STA As in the comment. Revise – generally agree with comment - TGax editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r0 that are marked with CID 9844. 9971 Yuchen Guo 70.04 The expression "The Wake TBTT Negotiation subfield is set to in TWT elements transmitted by a responding STA and by a scheduling STA." is not correct. When the TWT scheduling STA transmits a TWT response frame as a response to a TWT request frame in the negotiation procedure of wake TBTT and listen interval, The value of the Wake TBTT Negotiation subfield should be equal to 1. The Wake TBTT Negotiation subfield is set to 1 in TWT elements transmitted by a responding STA and by a scheduling STA in the negotiation procedure of wake TBTT and listen interval, and set to otherwise. Revise – generally agree with comment - TGax editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r0 that are marked with CID 9971.