participate in a training workshop For single activities delivered over more than one day with the same group of people, only count each person as 1 participant (e.g. people participating in an art class delivered over a two-day weekend would be counted only once) For different activities delivered as part of a series with the same group of people, count each person for each different activity that makes up the series (e.g. people participating in a series of three different workshops delivered as part of a workshop series would be counted as 3 participants – once per workshop) DO NOT COUNT: Staff Volunteers REGIONAL DEFINITIONS: Brisbane – Brisbane City Council area Greater South East Queensland (excluding Brisbane) – Gold Coast City Council, Ipswich City Council, Lockyer Valley Regional Council, Logan City Council, Moreton Regional Council, Redland City Council, Scenic Rim Regional Council, Somerset Regional Council, Sunshine Coast Regional Council Outside South East Queensland (but still in Queensland) – any part of Queensland outside Brisbane and Greater South East Queensland Interstate – any part of Australia outside Queensland Overseas – any part of the world outside Australia Locations where you undertook the activities Definitions Counting method and Locations – communities where you undertook the activities reported in Question 2 Provide list of communities receiving activities reported in Question 2 EXAMPLES: An organisation reported in Question 2 that they undertook 1 activity in Brisbane and 2 activities outside South East Queensland. Locations would be listed in Question 3 as Inala (Brisbane), Bundaberg and Winton. Television, radio and publication reach (IF RELEVANT to your organisation or project or program) Source of information: broadcast records, publication circulation records Definitions Counting method and rules
Respondents who rated your work as good or excellent – peers and/or partners who completed your survey(s) and answered the overall rating question as ‘good’ or ‘excellent’ – individuals who have engaged with your work and could comment on its artistic/cultural merit Partners – individuals and organisations that have played a significant role supporting the delivery of your activities (e.g. sponsors, delivery partners) Count number who answer ‘good’ or ‘excellent’ to the following ‘overall rating’ question in peer survey(s): ‘How would you rate the [performance/exhibition/event] overall?’ and/or number who answer ‘good’ or ‘excellent’ to the following question in partner survey(s): ‘How would you rate your experience of the partnership overall?’ Calculate as % of total survey respondents who answered this question EXAMPLES: A music ensemble sends an online survey to 10 peers in the music industry who attended their concert. Of the 10 responses received, 7 peers rated the ensemble’s work as ‘good’ or ‘excellent’. This would be calculated as 70% of respondents rating the work as good or excellent (number = 7). A community cultural development organisation sends an online survey to 20 partners who have significantly contributed to delivery of their programs over the past year – e.g. a school teacher, council arts officers, arts organisations that helped deliver activities and financial sponsors. Of the 15 partners who respond to the survey, 10 rated their overall experience of the partnership as ‘good’ or ‘excellent’. This would be calculated as 67% of respondents rating the work as good or excellent (number = 10). Total number of survey respondents – total number of people who completed your survey(s) Refer to counting method in Question 8 Response rate – percentage of people who completed your survey(s) when invited Refer to counting method in Question 8 Examples of innovation Source of information: Project/activity records You are not expected to tick all boxes. Please only select those that were significant Definitions