. 11606 Dorothy Stanley 401.25 N_STS seems undefined in Table for HE TB PPDU and HE ER SU PPDU. Is it per-user or total over all users with HE TB PPDU? As in comment Revises. Change to as in the resolution of CID11606 in doc 11615 Dorothy Stanley 402.20 N_STS seems undefined in Table for HE TB PPDU and HE ER SU PPDU. Is it per-user or total over all users with HE TB PPDU? As in comment Revises. Change to as in the resolution of CID11615 in doc Dorothy Stanley 404.16 N_STS seems undefined in Table for HE TB PPDU and HE ER SU PPDU. Is it per-user or total over all users with HE TB PPDU? As in comment Revises. Change to as in the resolution of CID11624 in doc 11632 Dorothy Stanley 404.59 N_STS seems undefined in Table for HE TB PPDU and HE ER SU PPDU. Is it per-user or total over all users with HE TB PPDU? As in comment Revises. Change to as in the resolution of CID11632 in doc 11519 Dorothy Stanley 420.3 N_STS seems undefined in Table for HE TB PPDU and HE ER SU PPDU. Is it per-user or total over all users with HE TB PPDU? As in comment Revises. Change to as in the resolution of CID11519 in doc 11525 Dorothy Stanley 421.22 N_STS seems undefined in Table for HE TB PPDU and HE ER SU PPDU. Is it per-user or total over all users with HE TB PPDU? As in comment Revises. Change to as in the resolution of CID11525 in doc
Discussions: BEAM_CHANGE value set to 0 does not apply to HE MU or HE TB PPDU. Hence definition is not needed for HE MU or HE TB PPDU. The commentor is right that should be defined for HE ER SU PPDU since BEAM_CHANGE value set to 0 does apply to HE ER PPDU. ax editor: please make the following change in D2.0 Clause On P392L50 (CID #11606, CID #11615, CID #11624, CID #11632, CID #11519, CID #11525): For an HE SU PPDU ,. 11608 Dorothy Stanley 401.25 Lets define or provide references to definitions of all the variables. As in comment Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID11608 in doc 14066 Youhan Kim 401.23 Nsts is undefined. Define Nsts used in Equation Revises. Change to as in the resolution of CID14066 in doc ax editor: please make the following change in D2.0 Clause 28.3.10.2.3 On P401L25 (CID #11608, CID #14066): Please add the following to P401L31 Dorothy Stanley 401.53 some of the variables are defined below Eq 28-9, and some are not. Lets define or provide references to definitions of all the variables. As in comment Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID11612 in doc 11613 Dorothy Stanley 401.53 In Clause 28.3.4 says: "In the HE TB PPDU, the pre-HE modulated fields, include L-LTF, L-SIG, and HESIGA fields, are sent only on the 20 MHz channels where the STA's HE modulated fields are located." I don't see how this equation as in comment Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID11613 in doc
insertion) is divided into two groups of 52 complex numbers, where respectively, the first 52 complex numbers form the first symbol of and the sec-ond 52 complex numbers form the second symbol of Dorothy Stanley 421.3 Lets define or provide references to definitions of all the variables. As in comment Rejected. Equations (28-18) and (28-19) are extensions of equation (28-16) and (28-17), describing HE ER PPU HE-SIG-A field time domain waveforms. All variables common to equations are already defined after equations (28-16) and The variables unique to equations (28-18) and (28-19) are defined for each equation. 11526 Dorothy Stanley 421.22 Lets define or provide references to definitions of all the variables. As in comment Rejected. Reasons as above. 11524 Dorothy Stanley 421.3 instead of defining N_20MHz=1, remove i_BW and K_shift from the equation As in comment Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID11524 in doc 11527 Dorothy Stanley 421.22 instead of defining N_20MHz=1, remove i_BW and K_shift from the equation As in comment Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID11527 in doc
Discussions: Although is still normalized by, the term is common to all RUs. Hence, it is correct to say that is the power boost factor for the r-th RU. The correct definition of is givein in 28.3.9. ax editor: please make the following change in D2.0 Clause 28.3.10.9 On P435L49 (CID #11414) 11533 Dorothy Stanley 434.15 Eq 28-22 is not clear. Both equations have a value at HES_0. The top equation has the value (1+j)/sqrt(2), but bottom equation has the value 0. Which is it? As in comment Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID11533 in doc 11534 Dorothy Stanley 434.64 Eq 28-28 is not clear. Both equations have a value at HES_248 and HES_-248. The top equation has the value (1+j)/sqrt(2) and (-1-j)/sqrt(2), but bottom equation has the value 0. Which is it? As in comment Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID11534 in doc 11535 Dorothy Stanley 435.01 Eq 28-29 is not clear. Both equations have a value at HES_504 and HES_-504. Which is it? As in comment Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID11535 in doc 11642 Dorothy Stanley 435.14 Eq 28-30 is not clear. Both equations have a value at HES_1016 and HES_-1016 and HES_8 and HES_-8. Which is it? As in comment Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID11642 in doc 11643 Dorothy Stanley 435.27 Eq 28-31 is not Both equations have a value at HES_504 and HES_-504. Which is it? As in comment Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID11643 in doc