zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
proposal. This would be a powerful way of delivering to low-income Americans the online freedom of speech—a freedom which too many today enjoy only in theory. The bottom line? Bridging the digital divide is my highest priority as FCC Chairman. To work, to learn, to educate, to heal, but most relevant here, to speak, we cannot fail or falter. It won’t be easy, but we’ll keep going. America’s civic future, including the tradition of free expression, depend on it. I’ll close where I began—in the 18th century. Our first President was quoteworthy in many respects, but one quote in particular has always caught my fancy. George Washington remarked that “[i]f the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.” A strong platform that allows the people to share their ideas and inform themselves about current affairs forestalls that fate. And in a remarkably short time, the Internet has become one such platform. The FCC’s charge and our cultural traditions remind us that we need to extend that online megaphone to all Americans. I look forward to working with you to do that—and to fulfilling this timeless vision for the digital age.
4 09/01/2017 WLVO FM BROADCASTING SERVICE, INC. PROVIDENCE RI WBRU 5 09/01/2017 WOEZ FM SAGA QUAD STATES COMMUNICATIONS, LLC BURTON SC WALI 6 09/01/2017 WPTT AM TOMSUN MEDIA, LLC HARTFORD WI WTKM 7 09/01/2017 WZTE AM INSPIRATION TIME, INC. NORTH EAST PA WMCE 8 09/04/2017 WQSN FM BRISTOL BROADCASTING COMPANY, INC. NORTON VA WSMQ 9 09/06/2017 FL JOHN PAUL II TRAINING CENTER FOR THE NEW EVANGELIZATION, INC GAINESVILLE GA 20131108AIK New 10 09/06/2017 WPVD AM HALL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. WEST WARWICK RI WLKW 11 09/07/2017 FL SANTA MARIA VALLEY MEDIA MINISTRY NIPOMO CA 20131028ARZ New 12 09/08/2017 KLUQ FM DENNIS WALLACE, COURT-APPOINTED RECEIVER HERMANN MO KQQX 13 09/08/2017 WYLY AM FM RADIO LICENSES, LLC BELLAIRE OH WLEJ 14 09/12/2017 FL SACRAMENTO FRENCH CULTURAL SOCIETY SACRAMENTO CA 20131115AAO New 15 09/13/2017 FL LONG COMMUNITY TELEVISION AND MEDIA CORPORATION LONG BEACH CA
31 09/22/2017 LP DIGITAL LLC DECATUR AL 32 09/25/2017 FL UBUNTU GREEN SACRAMENTO CA 20131113BPZ New 33 09/26/2017 KZEZ AM AMERICAST MEDIA, LLC SANTA CLARA UT 20041029AGF New 34 09/27/2017 KBLL FM THE MONTANA RADIO COMPANY, LLC HELENA MT 35 09/27/2017 FL THE JOSIAH MINISTRY REDLANDS CA 36 09/27/2017 FL CATALYST LONG BEACH INC LONG BEACH CA 20131114BGY New 37 09/27/2017 DC WJYL LLC JEFFERSONVILLE IN 38 09/29/2017 KBDT AM DALLAS BROADCASTING, LLC HIGHLAND PARK TX KVCE 39 09/29/2017 FL CITY CORPORATION HYRUM UT 20131114BMF New 40 09/29/2017 FL WABASH VALLEY EDUCATIONAL MEDIA HAUTE IN 41 09/29/2017 LD DIGITAL LLC TUSCALOOSA AL 42 09/30/2017 WYLE FM FM RADIO LICENSES, LLC GROVE CITY PA WWGY -F C C-
P-ROCEEDINGS 9:15 a.m. Welcome and Call to Order CHAIR BARTHOLME: Good morning everyone. Thanks for taking time on a Monday to come and join us. We're excited to have you here, and I think we have an agenda that is going to make good use of your time, so thanks again for joining us. Introductions and Meeting Logistics A couple of housekeeping items. Restrooms are out the door to the hall by where you came in and on your left. When you are speaking today please raise your hand and wait for your microphone to start working, and try to speak clearly and directly into the microphone, because it really helps with captioning. Very special thank you to U.S.
issued an FNPRM. The Chairman has publicly stated that he intends to complete this follow-on rulemaking by April 2018. The report that we issued on June 22nd analyzed the first two years of RCC data. It made a number of findings. It found that the aggregate call answer rate was slightly lower, about two percentage points in rural areas versus areas. Inconsistencies between and non-rural call completion aggregate call answer rates that's a mouthful -- are most likely due to issues with individual provider performance rather than a systemic problem. The data was found overall, however, to be somewhat unreliable because of variations in how covered providers reported their data, and in the types of data they were reporting. Such variations precluded the Bureau from drawing firm conclusions from this data.
we're going to have to end it there, since we're pretty far over now. Thank you both for coming. MR. Sure. Thanks for having us. MR. COPELAND: Thank you. Update on April 2017 Connect2Health Public Notice CHAIR BARTHOLME: Okay. So next up we have a presentation that some people have requested a couple of times over the years, and we actually at one point on the CAC had some medical representatives and had a working group devoted at least loosely to connected health issues. We're very happy to get an update today on the FCC's Connection2Health public notice, and Dr. Chris Gibbons, who's a physician advisor here at the FCC, is going to provide that for us. So welcome. DR. GIBBONS: Welcome. Thank you very much. Can you hear me? As most of you
where, you know, they know and accept these technologies. But they get it. In their own words they tell me we get it. We're scared. We don't really know how to use these things. But if we don't get access, if we don't start using, we're just going to be left further behind. So it's a complicated process. I don't think any one thing is going to be the silver bullet to fix it. I do think that a number of things working together can make substantial improvements in the problem, and that is one of the things that can happen. But by itself alone, it would be difficult to say what the impact would be today. But as part of a broader construct of tools, I think it's an important part. CHAIR BARTHOLME: Thaddeus. MEMBER JOHNSON: Yes. In responding to Paul, you mentioned the human touch, and my question is about the what has
Note 17 – Explanation of Differences between the Statement of Budgetary Resources and the Budget of the U.S. Government There were no material differences between the Combined Statement of Budgetary Resources (SBR) for FY 2016 and the amounts presented in the FY 2018 President’s Budget. The FY 2019 Budget of the United States Government (President’s Budget) with actual numbers for FY 2017 has not been published. Pursuant to 31 USC § 1105, the Budget of the United States Government will be released the first Monday in February, and will be available at the following website: http:/www.whitehouse.gov/omb. Note 18 – Custodial Revenues In accordance with the provisions of Statement of Federal Financial Accounting Standards (SFFAS) 7, Accounting for Revenue & Other Financing Sources, the Commission collects non-exchange revenues related to miscellaneous receipts and fines and forfeitures to the Treasury General Fund. Additionally, there is exchange revenue reported on the Statement of Custodial Activity associated with the radio spectrum auction proceeds. For more information, refer to Note 1 M. Note 19 – Reconciliation of Net Cost of Operations (Proprietary) to Budget (Formerly the Statement of Financing) As of September 30, 2017 and 2016: Note 20 – Subsequent Event On October 16, 2017, the Commission released a Public Notice (PN) regarding the initial reimbursement allocation of the TV Broadcaster Relocation Fund for eligible broadcasters and MVPDs. In the PN (DA- the Commission established a total allocation slightly over $1 billion to reimburse eligible entities for
The Commission reports in Table 4 the disposition of recaptured funds from FY 2017 payment recapture audits. 4 Disposition of Funds Recaptured Through Payment Recapture Audits ($ in millions) Program or Activity Amount Recovered (This amount will be identical to the “Amount Recovered” in 3) Type of Payment (contract, grant, benefit, loan, or other) Original Purpose USF – HC $2.080 Benefit $2.080 USF - S&L $1.239 Benefit $1.239 USF – LL $0.011 Benefit $0.011 USF - RHC $0.000 Benefit $0.000 USF - Admin $0.000 Contract $0.000 FCC $0.000 Contract $0.000 NANP $0.000 Contract $0.000 TRS $0.000 Benefit $0.000 TOTAL $3.330 $3.330 The Commission reports in Table 5 the aging of its outstanding overpayments from the payment recapture audits performed in FY 2017. Table 5 Aging of Outstanding Overpayments Identified in the Payment Recapture Audits ($ in millions) Program or Activity Type of Payment (contract, grant, benefit, loan, or other) Amount Outstanding (0 – 6 months) Amount Outstanding (6 months to 1 year) Amount Outstanding (over 1 year) Amount determined to not be collectable (include justification in Payment Recapture Narrative)) USF-HC Benefit $0.830 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 USF-S&L Benefit $2.707 $1.043 $0.000 $0.000 USF-LL Benefit $0.011 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 USF-RHC Benefit $0.113 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 USAC Admin Contract N/A N/A N/A N/A NANP Contract N/A N/A N/A N/A FCC Contract N/A N/A N/A N/A TRS Benefit N/A N/A N/A N/A $3.661 $1.043 $0.000 $0.000 III. Barriers
March 7-10, where he led a team to review recovery efforts, evaluate lessons learned from Hurricanes Irma and Maria, and prepare for the upcoming hurricane season. The Commission has taken numerous actions to promote public safety and connectivity in the aftermath of last year’s hurricanes. In addition to providing public information on network outage conditions and sending staff to monitor and aid recovery efforts, the Commission offered the territories nearly $77 million in advanced universal service funding to help recovery, accelerated the post-incentive auction transition to support Puerto Rico and U.S. Virgin Islands broadcasters, granted temporary waivers of Lifeline’s recertification rules, expedited approval of experimental licenses for Alphabet’s Project Loon to provide Internet access to residents, approved targeted and flexible E-Rate support to help restore connectivity of schools and libraries, and granted more than 500 waivers and requests for Special Temporary Authority (STA) to help re-establish communications in hurricane-affected areas. ### Office of Media Relations: (202) 418-0500 ASL Videophone: (844) 432-2275 TTY: (888) 835-5322 Twitter: @FCC www.fcc.gov/media-relations This is an unofficial announcement of Commission action. Release of the full text of a Commission order constitutes official action. See MCI v. FCC, 515 F.2d 385 (D.C. Cir. 1974).
Anonymous AT&T Services, Inc. DHS, Office of Emergency Communications Free Press Hughes Network Systems, LLC Liberty Cablevision of Puerto Rico LLC National Consumer Law Center National Hispanic Media Coalition Rappaport, Theodore Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center for Wireless Inclusive Technologies Star Solutions Telecommunications Regulatory Board of Puerto Rico T-Mobile USA, Inc. WorldNet Telecommunications, Inc.
Cout <<"Illegal argument to power"; Break ; } for(int i = 1; i <= n; ++i) result = result * x; return result; } Cout <<"Illegal argument to power"; Break ; } if(n > 0) return ( x * power(x, n-1) ); //recursive case else return(1); //base case } Write an iterative method to compute the factorial of a number. public static int iterativeFactorial(int n) { if(n < 0) { Cout << ”Sorry negative numbers not allowed.”; Break; } int result = 1; for(int i = 1; i <= n; ++i) result = result * i; return result; } Write a recursive method to compute the factorial of a number. public static int factorial(int n) { if(n < 0) { Cout <<“Sorry negative numbers not allowed.” ; System.exit(0); } if(n == 1) //base case return(1); else return (n * factorial(n-1)); //recursive case }
conduct a two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests. We are not able to reject the null, i.e., the SIAT and DB1B distribution of fares are the same, in over 75% of the markets. The majority of those markets where we reject the null have Tokyo (NRT) as an endpoint. Summary Overall, we find that the distribution of in the SIAT matches that of the DB1B quite well despite the modest sample sizes. This gives us great confidence that the SIAT can serve as a detailed source of information on air travel. That is, since the DB1B provides no information on the reason for travel, time of purchase, passenger demographics, and many other items of interest to both academic and industry researchers, it is often of limited use. Further, we identify statistical relationships between the SIAT and DB1B that strongly suggest that even moderate increases in the sample size of the SIAT will make it a significantly more valuable tool for researchers. Precisely, we show the following: Match between SIAT and DB1B improves substantially with larger sample sizes. Specifically, correlation between market-year-quarter specific means (and other measures) in the two surveys is strongly decreasing in the number of observations in the SIAT. Alternative measures of central tendency that are less sensitive to outliers, e.g. median, perform very well in even very small and highly-disaggregated samples. The match between the SIAT and DB1B is worse for higher fare quantiles. Essentially, the tail of the distributions is difficult to match except with very large samples. However, Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests are not able to reject null that SIAT and DB1B are drawn from same distribution even when highly disaggregated. Rejections are largely due to Tokyo markets. Higher levels of aggregation, either over longer time horizons (rather than year-quarter) or across airports (rather than markets), substantially improves the between the SIAT and DB1B. Thus, even the currently moderate sample sizes are appropriate for analysis at this level of aggregation. Academic and industry researchers should have confidence in using the survey to supplement DB1B information to learn more about passenger populations even in relatively small and selected subsamples.
Safeguarding NA – See TSA Safeguarding policy NA – See TSA Safeguarding policy NA – See TSA Safeguarding policy Incident – No medical intervention Personal data Until the young person is 21 or 3 years, whichever is greater Legal claims raised against the incident Donors Data Process Data Type Retention Justification Individual Givers Personal Data 1 Year To keep you informed of your donation Gift aid declaration 6 Years after donation HMRC Tax Audit Direct debit mandate 6 Years after last Direct Debit As proof of Direct Debit Instruction (DDI) and to assist in claims against that DDI Customers Data Category Data Type Retention Justification Scout Shop Merchandise Personal data 1 Year Required for enquiries on purchases and account Transaction data 6 after the end of the financial year of the purchase or duration of warranty period, whichever is longest HMRC Tax Audit or warranty period Adventure Centres Personal data 1 Year Required for enquiries on purchases and account Transaction data 6 Years after the end of the financial year of the purchase HMRC Tax Audit or warranty period Staff Data Process Data Type Retention Justification Income tax and NI records Personal data 3 years from the end of financial year to which they relate The Income Tax (Employments) Regulations 1993 (SI 1993/744) as amended, for example by The Income Tax (Employments) (Amendment No. 6) Regulations 1996 (SI 1996/2631) Payroll wage/salary records (also overtime, Personal data 6 years from the end of the tax year to which they relate Taxes Management Act 1970
‘Suicide prevention, it’s everyone’s business’ is the first conference of its kind in our region. It will provide workers and volunteers with suicide prevention strategies and supports with a rural focus that will have an impact when delivered in our rural and regional communities. As rural practitioners we find that too often we attend conferences that provide us with some great strategies, but find that we just cannot convert them into a suitable model for rural communities. The focus for our wide range of presenters is to provide ‘Rural Strategies That Work’. Our rural communities face many of the high risk factors associated with poor mental health and an increased risk of suicide. With an area that is predominantly farming, facing economic and financial problems, and stressors related to changing climatic conditions, including sustained periods of drought interspersed with major flood events. Rural areas face an ageing population, often residing in small communities with large distances to travel, face high levels of stigma associated with mental health and poorer social determinants of health, which compound other factors. The Loddon Healthy Minds Network is pleased to invite your organisation to join us as a sponsor in providing this important event. The following page provides details on the available sponsorship opportunities. If you have any queries or require further information please contact: Wendy Gladman, Director Community Wellbeing Loddon Shire Council Email: Telephone: (03) 5494 1226 We sincerely appreciate your consideration of this opportunity.
OPENING CEREMONIES TBD COACHES BREAKFAST: Monday, July 22, 2013, Time: TBD Location: TBD GAMES: Monday, July 22, 2013 to Sunday, July 28, 2013 Sam Lynn Ball Park 4009 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93308 Admission: TBD HOTELS: Marriot Springhill Suites in Bakersfield 3801 Marriott Drive Bakersfield, CA (661) 377-4000 (888) 287-9400 Marriott Courtyard in Bakersfield 3601 Marriott Drive Bakersfield, CA 93308 (661) 324-6660 (800) 321-2211 NW Bakersfield Baseball has Free RV parking available at the fields, no hookups.
Red Robin 8245 Laguna Blvd (916) 683-0370 Sizzler 8531 Bond Road (916) 685-1553 BBQ Bull 9625 East Stockton Boulevard (916) 681-8464 BUFFET Golden Corral 7700 W Stockton Blvd (916) 689-4300 Hometown Buffet 9089 Bruceville Road (916) 684-2771 CHINESE Happy Garden Chinese Restaurant 9081 Elk Blvd (916) 686-3933 Panda Express 9154 East Stockton 140 (916) 686-0626 ITALIAN Palermo Ristorante Italiano 9632 Emerald Oak Dr (916) 686-1582 Romano’s Macaroni Grill 8295 Laguna Boulevard (916) 478-2878 Italian Restaurant 8901 Elk Grove Florin Road (916) 685-2161 Strings Italian Cafe 5109 Laguna Boulevard (916) 683-2550 MEXICAN Baja Fresh 7419 Laguna Blvd, Ste 220 (916) 691-2252 Chevy’s Fresh Mex 7401 Laguna Blvd, Ste 100 (916) 691-3400 Dos Coyotes Border Cafe 8519 Bond Road (916) 687-379 PIZZA Pizza Bell 8591 Elk Grove Blvd (916) 685-1560 Old Town Pizzeria 9677 Elk Grove Florin Road (916) 686-6655 Mountain Mike’s 8441 Elk Grove-Florin Road (916) 681-6878 Round Table Pizza 8795 Elk Grove Blvd (916) 685-2190 Original Pete’s Pasta, and Grill 2475 Elk Grove Bld. (916) 683-5757 SANDWICHES Quizno’s 9170 Elk Grove Florin Road (916) 714-7849 Subway 8639 Elk Grove Blvd (916) 686-6618
in a frequency band and in a Region where this service is not subject to a Plan, with the exception of the coordination between earth stations operating in the opposite direction of transmission § 2.2.1.2 and 3.2 of Appendix 8 exceeds 6%. When the Bureau, on request by an affected administration, studies this information pursuant to No. 9.42, the calculation method given in § 2.2.1.2 and 3.2 of Appendix 8 shall be used 12.2-12.5 GHz (Region 3) 12.512.75 GHz (Regions 1 and 3) 12.712.75 GHz (Region 2) and 13.7514.8 GHz operation functions (see No. 1.23) with a space station within an orbital arc of 6° of the nominal orbital position of a proposed network in the FSS or BSS, not subject to a Plan iii) in the band 14.5-14.8 GHz any network in the space research service (SRS) or FSS not subject to a Plan and any associated space operation functions (see No. 1.23) with a space station within an orbital arc of ±6° of the nominal orbital position of a proposed network in the SRS or FSS not subject to a Plan TABLE 5-1 (continued) (Rev.WRC1) Reference of Article 9 Case Frequency bands (and Region) of the service for which coordination is sought Threshold/condition Calculation method Remarks No. 9.7 GSO/GSO (cont.) 2bis) 13.4-13.65 GHz (Region 1) i) Bandwidth overlap, and ii) any network in the space research service (SRS) or any network in the FSS and any associated space operation functions (see No. 1.23) with a space station within an orbital arc of ±6° of the nominal orbital position of a proposed network in the FSS or SRS
TABLE 5-1 (continued) (Rev.WRC1) Reference of Article 9 Case Frequency bands (and Region) of the service for which coordination is sought Threshold/condition Calculation method Remarks No. 9.7 GSO/GSO (cont.) 5) 17.717.8 GHz i) Bandwidth overlap, and ii) a) any network in the FSS and any associated space operation functions (see No. 1.23) with a space station within an orbital arc of 8° of the nominal orbital position of a proposed network in the BSS, or b) any network in the BSS and any associated space operation functions (see No. 1.23) with a space station within an orbital arc of 8° of the nominal orbital position of a proposed network in the FSS NOTE – No. 5.517 applies in Region 2. 6) 18.0-18.3 GHz (Region 2) 18.1-18.4 GHz (Regions 1 and 3) i) Bandwidth overlap, and ii) any network in the FSS or meteorological-satellite service and any associated space operation functions (see No. 1.23) with a space station within an orbital arc of 8° of the nominal orbital position of a proposed network in the FSS or the meteorological-satellite service
the drill during the transition to the day shift. The midnight shift supervisor specifically decided to drill at the shift change in order to help train the day shift’s warning officers for a ballistic missile defense scenario at a time when it would be challenging to properly respond. At 8:00 a.m., Hawaii Standard Time, the Hawaii Emergency Management Agency conducted its a regularly scheduled shift change. When the supervisor of the day shift entered the agency, the supervisor of the midnight shift orally communicated the intention to conduct the ballistic missile preparedness drill. But there was a miscommunication. The incoming day shift supervisor thought that the midnight shift supervisor intended to conduct a drill for the midnight shift warning officers only (those ending their shift) – not for the day shift officers (those beginning their shift). As a result, the day shift supervisor was not in the proper location to supervise the day shift warning officers when the ballistic missile defense drill was initiated. At 8:05 a.m., the midnight supervisor initiated the drill by placing a call to the day shift warning officers, pretending to be U.S. Pacific Command. The supervisor played a recorded message over the phone. The recording began by saying “exercise, exercise, exercise,” language that is consistent with the beginning of the script for the drill. After that, however, the recording did not follow the Hawaii Emergency Management Agency’s standard operating procedures for this drill. Instead, the recording included language scripted for use in an Emergency Alert System message for an actual live ballistic missile alert. It thus included the sentence “this is not a drill.” The recording ended by saying again, “exercise, exercise, exercise.” Three on-duty warning officers in the agency’s watch center received this message, simulating a call from U.S. Pacific Command on speakerphone.
B. Goal: Discussion “no one answer” questions How to write the PI question: Write questions which genuinely admit multiple possible answers, say while making design choices, modeling systems. Examples (note that these are merely ideas – you have to write the full question and choices): · If you choose only one X, which would it be? · What do you think is the reason for Y? · If you had to make a decision for Z, what would it be? C. Goal: Predict an outcome (e.g., of an experiment, or a program) How to write the PI question: Describe the experiment. You can partially show it (not the result) using a demo, video, simulation. Ask students to predict what would happen if something were changed. Choices should indicate specific possible outcomes. Examples: If P were changed, what would happen to Q? (You can ask along following parameters) (note that these are merely ideas – you have to write the full question and choices): i) …becomes bigger/ smaller ii) … changes brightness – increase / decrease / stay same iii) … changes to A / B / C iv) … moves along path A/ B/ C … voting, during discussion phase, ask students to give reasons along with their choices. These are excellent questions to elicit students’ wrong reasoning patterns. D. Goal: Embed reasoning in answers
INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION Joint Coordination Activity On Accessibility and Human Factors TELECOMMUNICATION STANDARDIZATION SECTOR STUDY PERIOD 2013-2016 Doc 199 English only Original: English Source: Chairman JCA-AHF Title: Draft meeting report of Joint Coordination Activity on Accessibility and Human Factors (JCA-AHF), Geneva, 18 February 2015 Opening of the meeting The JCA-AHF meeting was held on 18 February 2015 during ITU-T SG16 meeting (09 February – 20 February 2015) and chaired by the JCA-AHF Chairman Andrea Saks (USA), vice-chairman Christopher Jones (UK). Mr Floris van Nes (The Netherlands) attended remotely. The Chairman welcomed the participants in the room and the remote participants, reminding that the meeting was captioned and that all participants need to identify themselves for the captioners each time they spoke. Christopher Jones who is deaf was attending with two British Sign Language (BSL) interpreters. Christopher signed to the interpreters who then spoke for him by translating his signs into voiced speech. Beat Kleeb is deaf too and the representative of the World Federation of the Deaf (WFD) also attended and had the interpreters voiced over his speech so that his comments could be understood. His normal sign language is not BSL but his contribution to chairman
Math Teachers' Circle Immersion Workshop [LOCATION] [CITY, STATE] [DATE 1 – DATE 2, YEAR] Schedule MONDAY, [DATE] 9:00-9:30 9:30-12:00 12:00-1:30 1:30-4:30 Evening TUESDAY, [DATE] 9:00-12:00 12:00-1:30 1:30-4:30 4:30 Evening WEDNESDAY, [DATE] 9:00-12:00 12:00-1:30 1:30-4:30 Evening THURSDAY, [DATE] 9:00-12:00 12:00-1:30 1:30-4:30 Evening FRIDAY, [DATE] 9:00-12:00 12:00 Welcome and Introductions Math session 1 Lunch Math session 2 Optional evening Session 1 Math session 3 Lunch Math session 4 Reception Optional evening Session 2 Math session 5 Lunch Math session 6 Optional evening Session 3 Math session 7 Lunch Math session 8 Optional evening Session 4 Math session 9 Lunch for Participants and Family
RECIPIENT IDENTIFICATION Initials ID assigned by Anthony Nolan ID assigned by TC ID assigned by registry TC name IDENTIFICATION Donor ID CANCELLATION OR POSTPONEMENT? Cancellation Postponement Reason COMPLETED BY Print name Signature TC name / donor registry / organisation Date day/month/year PLEASE COMPLETE AND RETURN TO ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT Print name Signature TC name / donor registry / organisation Date day/month/year
Green Officers Contacts Joondalup Campus Alice White Student Central Building 18 & B3 ML 6304 2485 Danielle Adderson Facilities and Services Bookshop Building 32 6304 3761 Maddie Guard Faculty Education and Arts Learning & Teaching Office Building 8 6304 5731 Meenu Vitarana Faculty of Computing, Health and Science School of Natural Sciences Building 19 (Room 375) 6304 5176 Paul Midgley IT Services Centre Building 31 6304 3788 Vina Zhao Risk Management and Audit Assurance Building 1 6304 2093 Wendy Joy Morris Library Service Centre Building 32 6304 3715 Trish Wolski Governance & Planning Building 1 6304 2842 Dr Janice Redmond Faculty of Business and Law, Building 2, 6304 2153 Mohammad Hossain IT Services Centre Building 31 6304 3921 Alicia Lopez IT Services Centre Building 31 6304 2696 Julia Jackman Student Services Central Building 31 6304 3850 Linda Horton Human Resources Building 1 6304 2466 Lorna Viljoen Facilities and Services Building 1 6304 2403 Belinda Somers Sports & Recreation Building 22 & B21 ML 6304 5000 Clare Clarke Corporate Marketing office Building 1 6304 5501 Maas Governance and Planning Services, Building 1, 6304 2052 Mount Lawley Campus Jason Barrow Faculty of Education and Arts Rod Giblett Faculty of Education and Arts
Support the protective functions of forests by identifying and compiling relevant information for awareness-raising, decision-making and strengthening cooperation. (agreed ad ref.) Article 10. Socio-economic functions of forests Parties shall have in place or adopt legislative, administrative or other policy measures to: Ensure that social and cultural benefits of forests, including recreation, human health and well-being, and the preservation and promotion of the forest-related historic cultural heritage as well as gender equality, are taken into account in sustainable forest management; (agreed ad ref.) Broaden and diversify the financial basis for sustainable forest management by taking into account the values of forest ecosystem services, in particular their regulating, cultural and supporting services, in national forest programmes or equivalents and facilitate the development and implementation of measures and innovative financing instruments, such as payments for ecosystem services, as appropriate; (agreed ad ref.) Aim at increasing the contribution of forests to sustainable development, and in particular to rural development, livelihoods and employment, ensuring healthy and safe work places according to international labour standards and taking into account gender equality; (agreed ad ref.) Improve the use of scientific and traditional forest-related knowledge in policy development, decision-making and innovation, and to promote training and education in sustainable forest management; (agreed ad ref.) Facilitate communication between policy-makers and all stakeholders including forest owners and managers, practitioners, the scientific community and non-governmental organizations in order to improve policy development and implementation and to increase awareness of sustainable forest management. (agreed ad ref.) Article 11. Monitoring and reporting Parties shall monitor and analyse or assess on a regular basis the status and development of their forests, and analyse or assess the progress in implementation of sustainable forest management using the criteria for sustainable forest management referred to in paragraph 2.a of Article 4 and indicators established by the Conference of the Parties. (agreed ad ref.) Parties report, through the secretariat, to the Conference of the Parties on a periodic basis as determined by the Conference of the Parties as well as ensuring that such information is available to the public within their national territory:
PILOT 1 Co-production innovation, research or intervention project Launch application form – 2 Jul18 Support research groups/individuals to apply Applications received by 12 Aug18 Applications reviewed by panel – end of Aug18 Notification of decisions – early Sept 18 Funding awarded – mid/end Sept 18 PILOTS are live!* Prep for Pilots Report (findings from work completed) will be shared with all pilot and Centre collaborators *(All pilot collaborators to take part in co-production training session before works starts) PILOT 2 Community network development to enable co-production Launch call for expressions of interest – 2 Jul18 Develop partnership for joint development work – end Aug18 Work takes place with partner and Centre collaborators to test out how to develop a network 3 Needs based training development Launch call for expressions of interest – 2 Commission organisation to complete the work – end Aug18 Development work takes place with organisation chosen and Centre collaborators 4 Needs based resources/materials development Figure - Table outlining the detailed timeline for the Pilots work (please ask is you would like this explained in more detail) Q: What’s next? There are 3 different ways to get involved in the UCL Centre for Co-production in Health research Pilots. They are: By applying for funding (£3000-5000) to deliver a co-production project (innovation, research or intervention) – this is Pilot 1. Please complete the attached Application Form (Document 3) and email your submission to
The Tropical Cyclone Season in the Southwest Pacific Region officially runs from 1 November to 30 April. Should tropical cyclogenesis become a possibility at some other time of the year, Tropical Cyclone Season procedures are activated. Definition: Tropical Cyclone A non-frontal low pressure system of synoptic scale developing over warm waters and having a definite organised wind circulation with a maximum 10-minute average wind speed of 34 knots (63 km per hour ie gale force) or greater near the centre. Tropical Cyclone Names RSMC Nadi will provide identification for tropical cyclones developing in its region of responsibility by allocating names in sequence from a list approved by the WMO RAV Tropical Cyclone Committee for the South Pacific and South-East Indian Ocean whenever there is reasonable evidence that a tropical cyclone has formed. The naming criteria adopted in the 8th Session of the WMO RAV Tropical Cyclone Committee for the Southwest Pacific meeting in Rarotonga, September 2000, was amended in the 9th session in Manila, Philippines in May 2002. It was further amended in the 10th Session in Brisbane, Australia in July 2004 to read: A non-frontal low pressure system of synoptic scale developing over warm waters, will be named whenever observations and/or Dvorak intensity analysis indicate the presence of gale force or stronger winds near the centre which are likely to continue. It includes systems that satisfy these criteria but have a non-classical appearance in the satellite imagery and/or form further south than the normal formation areas. Contingency Plan for Failures of RSMC Nadi If a tropical cyclone with storm or hurricane force winds is likely to threaten RSMC Nadi in the near future then RSMC Nadi should discuss the situation with the duty Lead Forecaster in Wellington RSMC. One of the objectives of any discussions will be to decide whether or not Nadi needs to send half-hourly check messages. If the situation does not warrant the sending of check messages then a review time must be set for another discussion with Wellington RSMC. Nadi needs to initiate Check Bulletins on the GTS (30min interval). Communications failure, advise RSMC Wellington, by telephone preferably, to be prepared to take over its TCWC functions. If no contact is established after 3 consecutive check bulletins, Wellington RSMC will assume TCWC responsibility. Figure 1 TC in RSMC Nadi Area since 2000/01 Season Figure 2 2014/15 Numbered Systems Figure 3 2014/15 TC Tracks Figure 4 2013/14 Post event best track Table 1 2013/14 Season TC Information
Status: This document was last revised or approved by the OASIS DocBook TC on the above date. The level of approval is also listed above. Check the “Latest version” location noted above for possible later revisions of this document. Any other numbered Versions and other technical work produced by the Technical Committee (TC) are listed at . TC members should send comments on this specification to the TC's email list. Others should send comments to the TC by using the "" button on the TC's web page at . This specification is provided under the Mode of the , the mode chosen when the Technical Committee was established. For information on whether any patents have been disclosed that may be essential to implementing this specification, and any offers of patent licensing terms, please refer to the Intellectual Property Rights section of the TC's web page (). Note that any machine-readable content () declared Normative for this Work Product is provided in separate plain text files. In the event of a discrepancy between any such plain text file and display content in the Work Product's prose narrative document(s), the content in the separate plain text file prevails. Citation format: When referencing this specification the following citation format should be used: [DocBook-v5.0.1] The DocBook Schema Version 5.0.1. Edited by Robert Stayton. 12 September 2018. OASIS Committee Specification Draft 01 / Public Review Draft 01. . Latest version: .
NOT HELP AND CONTACTS WITHIN THE AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION HELP – 802-522-6096 – – 802-595-2382 – - 802-793-1606 – - 802-793-1606 – – 802-279-8143
CE 803 P Project 5 - 10 10 CE 804 P Tour &Training - 2 CE 805 P Professional viva-voce - 2 Elective Courses Course Prerequisite CE 806 T : E1 Earthquake Resistant Design Structural Dynamics & Concrete Design 4 - 0 4 Transportation Planning & Economics Transportation Engineering-I 4 - 0 CE 807 T : E2 Operation Research Transportation Engineering-I, Advanced Structural Analysis, Geotechnical Engineering I & II 4 - 0 4 Rock Mechanics & Tunneling Technology Civil Engineering background 4 - 0 TOTAL CREDITS 21 - 10 30 OVERVIEW FOR B.TECH COURSE CIVIL ENGINEERING-Batch 2013 &2014 Semester-V Course Code Course Title L – P Credit (L+P)
Revised Date for Supplementary of 3rd, 5th and 7th semester Timing- 10:00 AM Venue: ABII-101 Semester Date/Day Course Title Course Title 5th 31-07-2017 Design Of Concrete Structures I - - 01-08-2017 Geotechnical Engineering- I - Geology & Seismology - 02-08-2017 - - Traffic Engineering & Road Planning - 3rd/7th 31-07-2017 Structural Analysis I Design of concrete structure-ii - - 01-08-2017 Fluid Mechanics I Irrigation & flood structures Building materials Environmental Engg. 02-08-2017 - Structural dynamics SOM Lab - Date sheet for missed midterm and midterm for repeat courses Semester Date/Day Course Title Course Title 31-07-2017 Physics-II Design Of Steel Structures Machine Drawing Geotechnical Engineering-II 01-08-2017 Mathematics-II Transportation Engineering-I C Programming Water Resources Engineering 02-08-2017 Elements of Civil Engineering Advanced Structural Analysis Basic Electronics and communication Engg. Quantity Survey & Cost Estimation 31-07-2017 Structural Analysis-II Design of Bridge Structures Surveying-II Hydropower Engineering 01-08-2017 Fluid Mechanics-II Operation Research Concrete Technology Earthquake Resistant Design 02-08-2017 - Transportation Planning & Economics Numerical Methods Rock Mechanics & Tunneling Technology Umar Wani Er. Misba Gul (Asst. Exam Coordinator) I/C Head Copy to: Dean Academic Affairs I/C Head CSE/EE/ECE/ME/Chemistry/Physics/AFM I/C controller I/C D. R. Academics File
Messages Preferences The only selection that is related to PSU users is the Indexing option. Workspace Menu: A Workspace is a set of panels that open by default. Users can add or remove panels once workspace is opened. Changes to layout can be saved using the "Save as Current" selection. "Restore Default Workspaces" will return workspaces to default layout of panels. Must have user rights to a workspace to have it included in the Workspace list. Custom workspaces can be set up by users. Help Menu has instructions. See screen shot below. Indexing Workspace: Includes panels for: Batches, Document Viewer and Indexing. Can resize, move or close each panel. Each has drop down menu and button bar. See screen shot below. To begin indexing: Unindexed batches of scanned or uploaded images and documents are displayed in the Batches panel. Batches are selected and the Check Out button used to check out the batch for indexing. See screen shot below. Checked-Out Batches are ready for indexing: Batch Panel display changes to display of thumbnails of images in batch. See screen shot below.
Code: Title: Learning Outcomes (LO) Evidence To Support My Assessment Applicant to insert LO from the Endeavour subject outline I have the skills & knowledge to meet this LO Evidence Number Name Of Evidence Portfolio Folder No. Portfolio Page No. 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 6 6.1
6.2 6.3 6.4 7 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 8 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 9 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 10 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 11 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4
Manage education initiatives X X X X X X X X Deliver prescribed exercise to clients with a disability or neurological impairment SISFFIT529A X X X X X X X X X Deliver prescribed exercise to older clients with chronic conditions SISFFIT531A X X X X X X X X X Plan and implement high performance training and recovery programs SISSSCO513 X X X X X X X X Provide advanced first aid HLTAID006 Reviva First Aid / Vital First Aid Reviva First Aid / Vital First Aid Reviva First Aid / Vital First Aid Reviva First Aid / Vital First Aid Reviva First Aid / Vital First Aid Reviva First Aid / Vital First Aid Reviva First Aid / Vital First Aid Reviva First Aid / Vital First Aid Reviva First Aid / Vital First Aid Conduct projects X X X X X X X X Address clients needs X X X X X X X X
Research Project Notice of Change Form Researchers who have received Grant Funding from the Endeavour Research Grant Program are required to submit a Notice of Change Form within 2 weeks of the change occurring. Researchers who have a current Expression of Interest (EOI) for Research Project approval to use Endeavour’s Facilities are required to submit a Notice of Change Form within 2 weeks of the change occurring. The Notice of Change Form is to be submitted electronically (MS-Word) by email attachment to the Office of Research: for review by the Research Management Committee. PROJECT DETAILS Project Title Chief Investigator Grant Approval Date* Grant Awarded* Grant Approval Number* EOI Approval Date* EOI Approval Number* *Complete the requested information as applicable to the research project NOTIFICATION OF CHANGE TO RESEARCH PROJECT Please state the change that has occurred? Please provide the reason for this change? How will this change affect the research project? Will this change require an extension of the research project?* *If an extension is required for an Endeavour funded project through the Research Grant Program, please complete the with this submission. Will this change result in abandonment of the research project? DECLARATION I (the undersigned), declare that the information I have provided within this document is true, correct and complete in every respect. I acknowledge that the submission of false, incorrect, incomplete or misleading information may result in cancellation of my application and/or delays in processing this form. Investigator Signature Date OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received Reviewed by RMC Approved Denied Date Notified Filed Contact Person
Does the exam contain any practical component? Yes No REASON FOR DEFERRAL* (To be completed on the Statutory Declaration overleaf, with supporting evidence attached) *Please note – this application for deferred examination will not be accepted by the College without the completed/signed Statutory Declaration and any other supporting evidence. DECLARATION I (the undersigned), declare that: I have read and understood the policies related to this form and that the information I have provided within this document is true, correct and complete in every respect. I have included any documentary evidence required. I acknowledge that the submission of incorrect, incomplete or misleading information may result in cancellation of my enrolment and/or delays in processing this request. I acknowledge that the Policies and Procedures have been made available to me online and I have read, understood and accepted these as conditions of my enrolment including the Assessment Policy Student Name Student Signature Date If under 18 years of age at time of application, signature of a parent or legal guardian is required Parent/Guardian Name Parent/Guardian Signature Date OFFICE USE ONLY Date initially received Reviewed by (Student Adviser) ☐ Noted in FileMaker NOTE: Student Advisers are to review these forms prior to submission to the Student Services Team Leader ☐ Accepted ☐ Rejected Reason for rejection Date sent to Student Services Team Leader Date reviewed by Student Services Team Leaders ☐ Accepted ☐ Rejected ☐ Further consultation required Reason for rejection Date sent to National Manager, Student Services Date reviewed by National Manager, Student Services ☐ Accepted ☐ Rejected ☐ Further consultation required Reason for rejection Date sent to Director, SS&R Date reviewed by Director, SS&R ☐ Accepted ☐ Rejected Reason for rejection Finalisation of Outcome ☐ Outcome recorded in SMS Date response letter sent Processed by
Sub Categories 1.3a & 1.3b Learning based activities. All other learning based activities. Basis and maximum allowable points [See para. B2.2 (a).] Must be consistent with foregoing Category 1 examples. Example of suitable evidence Similar in principle to other Category 1 examples. Points record for Categories 1.3a & 1.3b. Please leave shaded boxes clear for use by the assessor. Applicants are asked to follow the reference number system incorporated in the Table. [Please the Ref. No. of each piece of evidence in the top right hand corner of each item of evidence]. Points for Cat. 1.3a (RPA) Points for Cat. 1.3b (RWA) Date Event Evidence Ref. No. Claimed Assessor Agreed Claimed Assessor Agreed 1.3ab – 1 1.3ab – 2 1.3ab – 3 1.3ab – 4 1.3ab – 5 1.3ab – 6 1.3a – 1 1.3a – 2 1.3a – 3 1.3a – 4 1.3a – 5 1.3a – 6 1.3b – 1 1.3b – 2 1.3b – 3 1.3b – 4 1.3b – 5 1.3b – 6 Total points claimed and awarded for sub-categories 1.3a & 1.3b B4. Summary of points claimed for Learning Based Activities (Category 1)
Concept Benefits Risks Estimate of costs (1 5 - most expensive) Stakeholder opinions (1 – not favourable; 5 very favourable) Face to face training Enhance understanding of ELD through doing practical cases Use of existing EU DG Env. Materials (as to be adapted by trainers according to needs and traget groups) Complex to organize (dependent or target group, duration, number of trainers needed) 3* 4.10 Webinars Reduce costs Easy to organise Reliance on the (updated) existing material Limitations on practical use of the teaching Lack of technical knowledge of the users 1 3.45 ToT Building up a wider pool of ELD experts in EU Enable Member States to implement national ELD events with “their” experts Lack of appropriate trainers Lack of control over the delivery of training (quality assurance) Trainees may not become qualified ELD trainers in just one ToT Trainees are not available for duration of event which must be no less than 5 days 3* 3.41 Joint EU and MS trainings Enhance learning through doing case studies Control over the delivery of training (quality assurance) – all the same as in face to face! Exchange of national stakeholders with Host needed Interpretation Limited number of participants with concrete knowledge Audience with different needs and 4* 3.66
colleagues from EU Commission (1st hand advice) familiarity Peer 2 Peer training Direct exchange of experience between practitioners High practical learning effect given small number of participants Limited number of participants Lack of control over the delivery of training (quality assurance) 3* 3.17 ELDWiki One access point to information Available in different languages Set up and maintenance 5* 3.68 Reliance on existing networks Proven effective tool to disseminate the information Communication channels already established None identified 1 3.75 Helpdesk Direct responses to specific questions/problems by knowledgeable persons Ensuring coherent application of ELD across EU Uncertainty concerning the frequency of use 2 3.82 Environmental damage risk and evaluation IT Quantification of (imminent) environmental damage Margin of error Lack of use by practitioners 5* 4.22 Newsletter Easy to disseminate Informative Not used by practitioners Not sufficiently specific 2 3.17 Blended tool – E -tool One access to information Available in different languages Facilitating communication between different ELD stakeholders and practitioners Lack of technical knowledge of the users Lack of use by practitioners 5* 3.78 *Costs heavily depend on travel and accommodation costs being covered or not by the organisers ** IT tools require substantial upfront investment. The costs drop once the tool developed and