zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
DOE Implementation: DOE is designing an internal electronic system that will track DOE performance in implementing the EO and each item in the DOE Agency Plan. The tracking system will be used to compile compliance reports that are required by the Federal Plan. Current platforms under consideration include, but are not limited to, max.gov, iManage, and an internal system currently used by the Office of Human Capital. DOE Implementation: DOE expects to propose a rule that will include increased use of information technology for communications team members evaluating transmission applications. DOE Implementation: An enhanced version of the Dashboard has been released. DOE will publicly track Nationally and Regionally Significant Projects on the Dashboard and will use the current non-public collaborative MAX environment associated with the Dashboard. DOE will also encourage the use of the MAX collaborative workspace for all DOE infrastructure projects, where appropriate. Efforts to identify and publish aggregate data that will inform and facilitate project sponsor decisions such as project siting. DOE Implementation: The Federal Geographic Data Committee and OpenGov Working Group will continue ongoing efforts to identify and publish such data. DOE will continue to inventory existing data sets and will submit information to the appropriate interagency work group. DOE Implementation: By January 2013, EERE expects to evaluate the feasibility of developing a collaborative system and database for capturing and utilizing existing environmental data to inform future siting and regulations. Such evaluation will include a review of existing systems in the federal government that would meet this need. DOE Implementation: NE, in conjunction with INL, is developing a public version of its GIS based iMAP application (see Appendix A for description of iMAP), tentatively scheduled for release in FY 2013. This version of iMAP will provide the public with data and tools for identifying current and future federal government mission land-use needs, restricted and potential constraint areas, and existing rights of way and grazing allotments on the INL site. The application will also provide other contextual information such as roads, boundaries, facilities/buildings, and wells, etc. APPLICANT AND STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH Availability of descriptions of the application processes for major infrastructure permitting and review processes. DOE Implementation: Descriptions of many DOE application processes are already available on the DOE website, under the appropriate office page. However, in order to implement the goals and directives of the EO, DOE expects to update or post new descriptions of its
DOE Environmental Assessment Checklist Document Title: Reviewed By: Document Number Office/Phone: Document Date: Date: Attached is a checklist to aid in preparing and reviewing DOE Environmental Assessments (EA’s), prepared pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Like any checklist, it has both value and limits. On one hand, a checklist may help EA preparers and reviewers to: overlooking required or recommended items; identify needed analyses and discussions; provide a record of an internal review. On the other hand, NEPA analysis does not reduce to a single formula or checklist. Each DOE proposal presents unique circumstances and potential impacts. This checklist should be applied carefully because: no checklist can be universally comprehensive or complete; it does not substitute for the original laws, regulations, and guidance; it cannot ensure that the EA will be adequate under, and in full compliance with NEPA and associated federal laws and regulations; addressing generic items on a checklist alone may not lead to a sufficiently rigorous analysis of potential impacts of a proposed action; checklist items are not always of equal importance or weight (e.g., if threatened and endangered species are not addressed, an EA is generally inadequate; however, omitting beneficial impacts usually is not critical). In short, a checklist should not be relied upon as the only way to build quality into a DOE EA. It does not replace good judgment. Finally, this EA checklist is not intended to promote the rote generation of standardized documentation. It is not meant to encourage an ethic of minimal compliance with environmental, safety, and health standards. It cannot measure whether resources are appropriately allocated, or the extent to which DOE decision makers use NEPA information in decisions and whether those decisions improve protection of environmental quality. In the long run, the focus should be on the ultimate “product” of the NEPA process: high quality decisions and sound environmental stewardship. Office of NEPA Oversight, U.S. Department of Energy August 1994
High Level Plan Develop a quantitative analysis of the sensitivity of the factors in relation to the response. Using Minitab a regression equation was formulated in order to determine the sensitivity of each factor. This equation takes into consideration the sensitivity of each factor in relation to tension as a response. Force = 55.4 + 2.89 WindSpeed - 1.86 Radius - 0.169 Beta + 1.11 TethLen Detailed analysis A regression equation was developed and reiterated to remove unusual observations and close the gap of the prediction interval. The issue with this regression was that there is no constant mean of zero (Figure 2); hence the value is extremely low. However, the significance of each factor can be checked when P stat is compared at an alpha of 0.05. This comparison leads to Wind speed, Flight Path Radius and Tether Length being highly significant. We concluded to important outcomes, which were that these factors are very sensitive to tension and would still consider the Beta angle sensitive because it is a factor when flying and testing the glider. The following equation displays the sensitivity of each factor in relation to response Force = 55.4 + 2.89 WindSpeed - 1.86 Radius - 0.169 Beta + 1.11 TethLen Figure represents the versus fit of regression model The output analysis displayed a very low R-square value (8.0 %) because of so much variation (Figure 2) between response values. However, when observing the value of the Analysis of Variance output of DOE, the value is significantly high (82.14 %) to conclude that it is a valid experiment because in this scenario Minitab uses the effect of blocking into the experiment. Blocking is a technique in which the user is able to take the effect of an uncontrollable factor into consideration. So a slight change of wind speed that affects the regression line significantly will not affect the DOE analysis.
Date sheet for Supplementary Examination of B. Tech 5th & 7th Semester Electrical Engineering SEMESTER DATE / DAY COURSE TITLE (COURSE CODE) TIMING VENUE 5TH 25-07-2017/ TUESDAY Electrical Measurement (EE-502T) 10:00 P.M – 12:30 P.M SIMULATION LAB 26-07-2017/ WEDNESDAY Microprocessor (EE-503T) 10:00 P.M – 12:30 P.M 27-07-2017/ THURSDAY Communication Systems (EE-504T) 10:00 P.M – 12:30 P.M 28-07-2017/ FRIDAY Electrical Machines-I (EE-401T) Mathematics – V (EE-505T) 10:00 P.M – 12:30 P.M SEMESTER DATE / DAY COURSE TITLE (COURSE CODE) TIMING VENUE 7TH 25-07-2017/ TUESDAY Power System-II (EE-701T) Electrical Drives (EE-705T) 10:00 P.M – 12:30 P.M SIMULATION LAB 26-07-2017/ WEDNESDAY Power System Protection (EE-702T) 10:00 P.M – 12:30 P.M 27-07-2017/ THURSDAY Microcontroller (EE-703T) 10:00 P.M – 12:30 P.M Mr. Zahoor Ahmad Dr. S. A. Nehvi Examination Coordinator I/C Head , EE No:IUST/EE/DATESHEET/17 Dated: 18-07-2017 Copy to: Dean Academic Affairs Head (CSE,ECE) I/C Controller Exams Notice Board
Department of Electrical Engineering Date sheet for Mid Term Examination of B-Tech 3rd 5th & 7th semester Department of Electrical Engineering. Semester Day/Date Course Title. Timing 3rd 28-11-2017 (Tuesday) Analog Electronics (ECE-311T) 2nd Meeting 02:00-03:30pm 29-11-2017 (Wednesday) Electrical Engineering Materials (ELE-312T) 30-11-2017 (Thursday) Digital Electronics & Logic Design (ECE-313T) 04-12-201 (Monday) Net Work Analysis (ELE-311T) 06-12-2017 (Wednesday) Laplace, Fourier & Complex Analysis (MTH-313T) 07-12-2017 (Thursday) Elective-I (XXX-xxxX ) 5th 28-11-2017 (Tuesday) Electrical Machines-II (ELE-511T) Ist Meeting 10:15-11:45am 29-11-2017 (Wednesday) Numerical Analysis (MTH-511T) 30-11-2017 (Thursday) System-I (ELE-512T) 04-12-2017 (Monday) Advanced Control System (ELE-513T) 06-12-2017 (Wednesday) Microprocessors (ELE-514T) 07-12-2017 (Thursday) Elective-II (xxxxx) 7th 28-11-2017 (Tuesday) System-II (EE-701T) 2nd Meeting 02:00-03:30pm 29-11-2017 (Wednesday) Industrial Management (EE-704T) 30-11-2017 (Thursday) Microcontroller & Applications (EE-703T) 04-12-2017 (Monday) Electrical Drives (EE-705T) 06-12-2017 (Wednesday) Power System Protection (EE-702T) Mr. Zahoor Ahmad Coordinator Examination Department of EE Dr. S. A. Nahvi I/C Head Department of EE
Department of Electrical Engineering Subject:-Setting up of Question Paper for Mid Term Examination of below mentioned courses. Sir, Kindly set question Papers for Mid Term Examination of 30 Marks and 1 ½ hrs duration of B-Tech 1st, 3rd, 5th & 7th Semester Department of Electrical Engineering of the Course mentioned below. The same may be submitted on 27th of November 2017 as the examination is scheduled from 28th of November 2017. S. No subject Semester No. Of Papers 01. Network Analysis (ELE-311T) 3rd 110 (02 Envelops) 02. Electrical Machines-II (ELE-511T) 5th 110 (02 Envelops) 03. Advanced Control System (ELE-513T) 5th 110 (02 Envelops) 04. Microprocessors (ELE-514T) 5th 110 (02 Envelops) 05. Power System-I (ELE-512T) 5th 110 (02 Envelops) 06. Power System-II (EE-701T) 7th 110 (02 Envelops) 07. Electrical Drives (EE-705T) 7th 110 (02 Envelops) 08. Power System Protection (EE-702T) 7th 110 (02 Envelops) 09. Introduction to Electrical Technology 3rd 110 (02 Envelops) 10. Renewable energy resources 5th 110 (02 Envelops) 11. Basic Electrical Engineering (ELE-101T) Common for All Branches 1st 110 (02 Envelops) Mr. Zahoor Ahmad Coordinator Examination Department of electrical Engineering DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING I/C Head Department of Electronics &Communication Engineering
offices provide essential services to its mission programs, as well as serve the Secretary of Energy and protect taxpayer interests. While activities are varied among DOE Support Offices, the common focus is the safe, secure, efficient, and effective execution of the Department’s mission. () Strategic Goal Strategic Objective Programs 4. Management and Operational Excellence: Establish an operational and adaptable framework that combines the best wisdom of all Department stakeholders to maximize mission success 4A. Achieve Operational and Technical Excellence Departmental Administration Hearings and Appeals 4B. Implement a Performance-Based Culture Departmental Administration Health, Safety and Security Inspector General
Maryanne Diamond: Senior Advocacy and International Relations Advisor – Vision Australia Kylie Forth: Captain of Australia Blind Sailing Team – Western Australia Lauren Henley: National Policy Advisor – Blind Citizens Australia Ryan Honschooten: Youth Development Officer – Association for the Blind, Western Australia Graeme Innes AM: Australian Disability Discrimination Commissioner - Australia William Jolley: Statistician, Regulator of 000 Emergency Call Service ACMA Australia Ronald McCallum AO: Professor Emeritus Law – Sydney University – Australia Thomas Macmahon: Access Technology Consultant and Trainer – Queensland - Australia Maguire: Policy and Advocacy Advisor - Vision Australia Ramona Mandy: Access Technology Consultant – Humanware - Australia
Texoma Community Center Offender Education Program Calendar Location: 315 W. McLain Dr. Sherman, TX 75090 2017 Course schedule: Drug Offender Education Class Classes held Monday-Friday, 6-9 pm January 01.09.17 – 01.13.17 February 02.06.17 – 02.10.17 March 03.06.17 – 03.10.17 April 04.03.17 – 04.07.17 May 05.01.17 – 05.05.17 June 06.05.17 – 06.09.17 July 07.10.17 – 07.14.17 August 08.07.17 – 08.11.17 September 09.11.17 – 09.15.17 October 10.02.17 – 10.06.17 November 11.06.17 – 11.10.17 December 12.04.17 – 12.08.17 -Pre-registration is required prior to first night of class and scheduled by appointment only. -You will need to bring cause number of case for which course is required. -Non-refundable fee for course of $75.00 is due at the time of registration, cash or money order only, no personal checks -Call for any questions or to schedule a pre-registration appointment 903.957.4736, 903.957.4851 or 903.957.4881
Find out what vacations or road trips your partner gone on or is planning. Extend the conversation by adding two more comments of your own. Find out your partner grocery shops. Extend the conversation by talking about where you usually grocery shop and why. Find out what important information your partner heard or watched in the news this week. Extend the conversation add two more comments of your own. Find out about a restaurant at which your partner has eaten. Extend the conversation by asking about the food and environment. Also, share information about a restaurant you like. Find out if your partner has attended or will be attending a wedding this year. Extend the conversation by sharing information about a wedding you have attended. Find out a home project your partner is working on this summer, either in the house, garage, or yard. Extend the conversation by sharing information about a project on which you are working. Find out about a grandchild, niece, nephew, or other young person with whom your partner is close. Extend the conversation by sharing a story Find out your partner’s for the weekend. Extend the conversation by sharing your plans for the weekend.
about a young person with whom you are close. Find out if your partner attends any social, church, or other type of group during the week. Extend the conversation by sharing information about a group you have attended. Find out about a special recipe your partner has used in the past. Extend the conversation by describing a recipe with which you have had good luck.
SCHEDULE B: CONSULTANT’S SERVICES AND FEES CONSULTANT’S STAGE SERVICES The Consultant’s appointment is for as tabled below. PSDP SERVICES Performance of all the duties of Project Supervisor for the Design Process included in the Services as tabled below [and the Stage Fees]. Assigned Certifier sERVICES Performance of all the duties of Assigned Certifier is included in the Services as tabled below [and the Stage Fees]. Design Certificate SERVICES The Consultant is required to sign the Design Certificate. TOTAL FEE [9] as completed Form of Tender appended STAGE SERVICES Stage services Performance Period from permission to [4.4] () Milestones (if any) Percentage of Fee for Stage Stage fee Percentage of Stage fee for suspension [4.19,20] As Design Team procedures As ITTS / Letter of Acceptance N/A As signed Form of Tender attached N/A 10% STAGE SERVICES Not applicable
services Performance Period from permission to start [4.4] () Milestones (if any) Percentage of Total Fee for Stage Stage fee Percentage of Stage fee for suspension [4.19,20] % % Sub-Stage (ii a) Developed Design As Design Team Procedures As ITTS / Letter of Acceptance N/A As signed Form of Tender attached N/A 10% (ii b) As Design Team Procedures As ITTS / Letter of Acceptance N/A As signed Form of Tender attached N/A 10% Sub-Stage (ii c)
SERVICES Stage services Performance Period from permission to start [4.4] () Milestones (if any) Percentage of Total Fee for Stage fee Percentage of Stage fee for suspension [4.19,20] As Design Team Procedures As ITTS / Letter of Acceptance N/A As signed Form of Tender attached N/A 10% Details of stage services referred to above
13. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, DOCUMENTS 11 Transfer There transfer to the Client instead of licence. 14 Licence Client may use Consultant’s design etc. for – 15 Fees [if any] The only fees payable by the Client for its rights under this clause are: included in Tender Sum 18 Publicity Consent to publicity is required from . 14. TERMINATION 29 Payment where Client terminates at will Where the Client terminates Services at will although the Project is continuing, the Consultant is entitled to 10% of the difference between the Fees payable under clause 14.26 [without any apportionment under 14.27], and the total fee that would, as estimated at termination, have been payable on completion of the Services for the last Stage in or after which the termination occurred. 16. DISPUTES 1 Initial resolution method Not applicable 4 Nominator In default of agreement, an arbitrator, conciliator or other for 16.1, will be nominated at the request of either party by the following person[s]: President RIAI, SCSI, IEI as appropriate 5 Rules The applicable Rules are the following published for use with these Standard Conditions of Engagement: In the case of Arbitration, the arbitration rules are the Capital Works Management Framework (CWMF) Arbitration Rules for use with Public Works and Construction Services Contracts (AR1) published on on the date 10 days before the latest date for submission of Tenders for this contract (disregarding any amendments posted on that date). (Identify the that apply in each other resolution method, or where none any Rules agreed by the parties.)
services Performance Period from permission to start [4.4] () Milestones (if any) Percentage of Total Fee for Stage fee Percentage of Stage fee for suspension [4.19,20] % % Sub-Stage (ii a) Developed Design As Design Team Procedures As ITTS / Letter of Acceptance N/A As signed Form of Tender attached N/A 10% (ii b) As Design Team Procedures As ITTS / Letter of Acceptance N/A As signed Form of Tender attached N/A 10% Sub-Stage (ii c)
STAGE SERVICES Stage services Performance Period from permission to start [4.4] () Milestones (if any) Percentage of Total Fee for Stage Stage fee Percentage of Stage fee for suspension [4.19,20] As Design Team Procedures As ITTS / Letter of Acceptance N/A As signed Form of Tender attached N/A 10% STAGE SERVICES services Performance Period from permission to start [4.4] () Milestones (if any) Percentage of Total Fee for Stage Stage fee Percentage of Stage fee for suspension [4.19,20] As Design Team Procedures As ITTS / Letter of Acceptance N/A As signed Form of Tender attached N/A 10%
STAGE SERVICES Stage services Performance Period from permission to start [4.4] () Milestones (if any) Percentage of Total Fee for Stage fee Percentage of Stage fee for suspension [4.19,20] As Design Team Procedures As ITTS / Letter of Acceptance N/A As signed Form of Tender attached N/A 10% Details of stage services referred to above
Particulars The Particulars for each project are as set out in the Letter of Invitation and the Tender Documents provided (including the Forms of Tender and the attached Explanatory notes) Using (Instructions section 1.2 and 10.5) Terms of Engagement: Available from www.education.ie Supplemental Information and Queries (Instructions sections 2.2, 2.3) Latest date for queries 5 working days before latest time for receipt of Tender Date after which Contracting Authority will not normally issue supplemental information or responses to queries 3 working days before latest time for receipt of Tender Pricing (Instructions section 5.5) Pricing Format As stated on Form of Tender Provide a detailed breakdown of tender Not applicable Copies (Instructions section 5.3) Number of Paper Copies of tender One Number and type of Electronic Copies of tender: Not applicable Tender Documents (Instructions section 1.2) Attached to these Instructions are the following documents, divided into the two categories set out below: Documents to be included in the Contract DoES Schedule of Services, Revision 4, 2016 DoES Form of Tender Consultants – Minor (Design Team Leader) 2015 DoES Form of Tender Consultants - Minor (Engineers & QS) 2015 COE1 – Standard Conditions of Engagement for Consultancy Services (Technical) Architect, 2016 (incorporating Standard Schedules A and B) COE1 – Standard Conditions of Engagement for Consultancy Services (Technical) Engineers & QS, 2016 (incorporating Standard Schedules A and B) Project Brief Any other Project Specific Information provided with the Tender Documents for information purposes only (not to be included in the Contract) Not applicable
9. Assessment of Tenders, Continued 9.5 Assessment methodology (a) Tenders will be evaluated against the quality criteria set out in the Tender Documents. Any tender does not achieve any specified minimum quality score shall be excluded from further consideration. (b) Tenderers whose tenders have not been excluded following the evaluation against the quality criteria at (a) above will then have their tender prices assessed. (c) The price score will be determined in the manner specified in the Tender Documents (d) The quality and scores of tenders which have not been excluded will be added and the tender receiving the highest overall score will be the most economically advantageous tender. 9.6 Change in circumstances If, as a result of a change in circumstances or otherwise, any information given by an Applicant to the Contracting Authority, in a tender or otherwise, including in a suitability assessment questionnaire, was (when submitted) or has become (by reference to the facts as they then stand) untrue, incomplete or misleading, the Candidate must so inform the Contracting Authority as soon as it becomes aware of this. If appropriate, the Candidate may make a request under section 2.4 to change information in its suitability assessment submission. If it comes to the Contracting Authority’s attention that there has been a change in circumstances concerning an Applicant that could affect the Contracting Authority’s assessment of that Candidate’s tender or the Contracting Authority’s decision to invite the Candidate to submit a tender or information submitted by an Applicant was (when submitted) or has become (by reference to the facts as they then stand) untrue, incomplete or misleading the Contracting Authority may (but is not required to) revise its assessment of the Candidate’s tender or suitability assessment on the of the information then available to the Contracting Authority. 9.7 Suitability Assessment Without in any way limiting the Contracting Authority’s discretion, it is anticipated that the procedure set out in DoES-QC1 Suitability Assessment Declaration 2017 will be followed. The Contracting Authority reserves the to open and assess the packages containing the tenders in parallel with the evaluation of the Suitability Assessment Submissions.
(Instructions section 1.2 and 10.5) Terms of Engagement: Available from www.education.ie Supplemental Information and Queries (Instructions sections 2.2, 2.3) Latest date for queries 5 working days before latest time for receipt of Tender Date after which Contracting Authority will not normally issue supplemental information or responses to queries 3 working days before latest time for receipt of Tender Pricing (Instructions section 5.5) Pricing Format As stated on Form of Tender/Tender Proposal Form Provide a detailed breakdown of tender price Not applicable Copies (Instructions section 5.3) Number of Paper Copies of tender Not Applicable Number and type of Electronic Copies of tender: One copy issued via eTenders portal Tender Documents (Instructions section 1.2) Attached to these Instructions (or available on the Web) are the following documents, divided into the two categories set out below: Documents to be included in the Contract DoES PSDP Form of Tender/Tender Proposal Form – Consultancy Services COE1 – PSDP Standard Conditions of Engagement including Schedules A & B Project Any other Project Specific Information provided with the Tender Documents for information purposes only (not to be included in the Contract) Not applicable Instructions (other than any appendices listed in 1.7 of Schedule A to be contract documents) and any other information issued to Candidates not stated to amend the Contract documents are not to be included in the Contract Further Information Further information may issue as referred to in these Instructions Language (Instructions section 5.4) English
Tender Date (Instructions section 5.1) Latest date and time for submission of Tenders: dd-mm-yyyy hh:mm Tender submissions (in writing) must be sent to (Instructions section 5.1) Contact name Address Delivery by (Instructions section 5.1) hand or registered prepaid post. Tenderers should obtain a signed receipt acknowledging delivery. Copies (Instructions section 5.3) Number of Copies of Tender One Number and type of Electronic Copies of Tender: Not applicable Other (Instructions section 2.5) Not Applicable Tender Documents (Instructions section 5.2) Attached to Instructions are the following documents, divided into the two categories set out below: Documents to be included in the Contract Volume A Works requirements (as stated in Project Particulars) Volume B Form of Tender and Schedule Volume C Pricing Document. Documents for information purposes only (not to be included in the Contract) This Invitation to Tender Additional Information as referred to in Appendix 3 to this ITT and listed in Summary of Additional Information Further information may be issued as described in these Instructions Deposit (Instructions section 5.15) Deposit required on issue of tender documents Not Applicable Details of how tenders are to be packed and marked Format of Tender Submissions (Instructions section 5.4) Candidates should submit their tender in a sealed envelope or box (the “Outer Envelope”) containing one or a series of separate sealed envelopes or boxes, each containing one or more separate bound folder for each of: completed volume B completed volume C Works Proposals Additional information specified in Appendix 2 to Instructions
Each envelope or box within the Outer Envelope must be clearly marked with the name of the Candidate, the name of the Contract, and the content, and, if more than one copy is required, the copy number: for example “Tender of ABC Limited for [contract title], Volume C; Pricing Document copy 1, master”. If more than one tender is permitted or required, each envelope or box should also be marked with the unique identifier required under Section 6.4 of these Instructions Language (Instructions section 5.5) English Pricing (Instructions section 5.8) Pricing Format: Fixed Price, Lump Sum Substantial Completion (Instructions section 5.10) Substantial Completion As Schedule, Part 1 Form of Tender to be sealed (Instructions section 5.14) Mandatory Options (Instructions section 6.2) Are mandatory options required? Variants (Instructions section 6.3) Are variant tenders permitted? If variant tenders are permitted, is a standard tender also required? Minimum requirements for variants: Not applicable. Number of Tenders (Instructions section 6.4) Maximum number of Tenders per Candidate: One Tender validity period (Instructions section 10.1) As stated in Form of Tender in volume B. Agreement (Instructions section 10.5) To be executed under
Particulars These are the Particulars referred to in the Instructions. They are part of the Invitation to Tender (ITT) Tender for Title of Contract comprising General description of the Works At Location of the For Name of Employer Using (Instructions section 1.3) The form of Conditions set out in the Public Works Contract Designed by the Employer with a cited revision reference commencing with v2 published on on the date 10 days before the latest date for receipt of Tenders (disregarding any amendments posted on that date). Employer’s contact details (Instructions section 2.1) Contact name Address Phone: Fax: Supplemental Information and Queries (Instructions sections 2.2, 2.3) Latest date for queries 14 days before the latest time for receipt of Tender Date which Employer will not normally issue supplemental information or responses to queries 8 days before the latest time for receipt of Tender Employer’s contact details for queries (Instructions section 2.3) Contact name (or 'As above') [Note: If it is proposed to use the eTenders query facility this should be stated here.] Address (or 'As above') Phone: Fax: Change project supervisor [Instruction Section 5.10] Latest date for request to change project supervisor proposed by the Tenderer (where applicable) 21 days before latest time for receipt of tenders or Not Applicable
(Instructions section 6.4) Tender validity period (Instructions section 10.1) As stated in Form of Tender in volume B. Agreement (Instructions section 10.5) To be executed under Award Criteria (Instructions section 9.1) Note: The combined weightings for ‘Price’ and ‘Technical Merit’ must equal 100%. The formulae for assessment purposes are provided under Section 9.6 of these Instructions. Or
Works Proposals Additional information specified in Appendix 2 to these Instructions Each envelope or box within the Outer Envelope must be clearly marked with the name of the Candidate, the name of the Sub-Contract, and the content, and, if more than one copy is required, the copy number: for example “Tender of ABC Limited for [sub-contract title], Volume C; Pricing Document copy 1, master”. If more than one tender is permitted or required, each envelope or box should also be marked with the unique identifier required under Section 6.4 of these Instructions Language (Instructions section 5.5) English Pricing (Instructions section 5.8) Pricing Format: Fixed Price, Lump Sum Substantial Completion (Instructions section 5.10) Substantial Completion of main contract works As Part 1 G of the Form of Tender and Schedule to the main contract provided at Appendix 3 to these Instructions Form of Tender to be sealed (Instructions section 5.14) Mandatory Options (Instructions section 6.2) Are mandatory options required? Variants (Instructions section 6.3) Are variant tenders permitted? If variant tenders are permitted, is a standard tender also required? Minimum requirements for variants: Not Applicable Number of Tenders (Instructions section 6.4) Maximum number of Tenders per Candidate: One Tender validity period (Instructions section 10.1) As stated in Form of Tender in volume B. Agreement (Instructions section 10.5) To be executed under
Instruction to Tenderers for Reserved Specialists under a Restricted/ Negotiated/ Competitive Dialogue Procedure Document Reference ITT-W8 v 1.1 6 June 2018 © 2018 Office of Government Procurement Published by: Office of Government Procurement Department of Public Expenditure & Reform Government Buildings Upper Merrion Street Dublin 2
Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety Center for Chemical Process Safety, 2010 Cochrane Occupational Health http://osh.cochrane.org/osh-reviews Comcare of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations European Agency for Safety and Health at Work http://osha.europa.eu/publications/reports/7807118 Health and Safety Executive (UK) ) http://www.hse.gov.uk/msd/msds.htm Human Factors and Ergonomics Society of Australia http://www.ergonomics.org.au National Academy of Science http://www.nasonline.org/ NIOSH’s Prevention Through Design Safe Work Australia Workplace Health and Safety Queensland http://www.deir.qld.gov.au/workplace/zeroharm/index.htm#.U48NiPm1YqI World Health Organization http://www.who.int/en/ WHS Act & Code of Practice 2011 http://www.comcare.gov.au/the_scheme/the_whs_act/codes_of_practice
Application for condonation [8] The application is accompanied by an affidavit deposed to by Mr. Mbaeva, the appellant’s legal practitioner of record. The main reason advanced for the late filing of the heads is that the record of proceedings had been misfiled by his office and that the said fact hamstrung his ability to file the heads of argument timeously. The misfiling was ascribed to human error and it was also submitted that no prejudice enured to any of the parties as a result of the late filing of the heads of argument. [9] Mr. Khumalo, for the respondent, opposed the application for condonation. His main contention was that there was no full and cogent explanation for the with the rules of court in this instance. He argued that condonation should not be granted merely for the asking, particularly in circumstances where the defaulting party does not take the court fully in its confidence by stating fully and frankly the circumstances in which the delay took place. He argued further that the appellant had not, in his application dealt at all with the issue of prospects of success on appeal. [10] Mr. Mbaeva, whilst admitting that more could have been disclosed in the affidavit filed in support of the application for condonation, submitted that the appellant was under no obligation to deal with the issue of prospects of success as that issue does not form part of an enquiry such as that facing the court in the instant matter. I now turn to consider the question whether the appellant has made a case for condonation and whether all the necessary allegations entitling him to the grant of the order have been made. [11] It would appear to me that the provisions of rule 55 apply to this matter. The said rule reads as follows: ‘The court or the managing judge may, on application on notice to every party and on good cause shown, make an order extending or shortening a time prescribed by these rules or by an order of court for doing an act or taking a step in connection with proceedings of any
Language Report Card for: Department of Defense (DOD) Agency Home Page: http://www.defense.gov Grade: Basic requirement: B (80) Other activities: D (46) Part 1: How well does the agency comply with the basic requirements of the Act Criteria Notes Score Agency plain language page URL 10 Linked from the homepage? Yes 10 Do they name a senior official? Mr. Michael L. Rhodes, Director of Administration and Management (DA&M) 10 Do they list other contacts? Yes, but hard to find. 10 Is there contact info for the other contacts? Yes. Also asked individual branches to appoint contacts. 10 Do they have an implementation plan? Mr Rhodes' November 2011 memo was the DoD implementation plan. All it does is list the requirements of the Act. They say that as a result, they formed a DoD working group to prepare the DoD Instruction mentioned above. It will contain the necessary policy, assignment of responsibilities, and procedures to implement the Plain Writing Act. 4 Do they have a 2012 compliance report? Yes. Plain_Writing_Act_Compliance_Report.pdf 10 Does the website provide feedback mechanism? Yes, but just a general “contact us” link. DoDPlainLanguage@whs.mil 10 Are they plain language in all new or substantially revised covered documents? Not yet 0 How did they inform employees of requirement Originally, a directive to the tops of bureaus. Instruction on the DoD Plain Language Program is on track to be completed in September 2012. It will be published on the publically accessible DoD Issuances website (http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives) and announced on the DoD Plain Language website 6 Total score for basic compliance with Act: 80 (out of 100) Part 2: Agency compliance with the Plain Writing Act – Supporting activities
Revised Plan the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) at Rutherford Appleton Laboratory to the U.S. Department of Energy by the U.S. Muon Accelerator Program in response to the DOE program review on August 1214, 2014 Report Date: September 15, 2015 1. Introduction This report has been generated in response to the Technical and Management Review of the U.S. Muon Accelerator Program conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of High Energy Physics on August 1214, 2014. As stated in the review charge, the review was carried out… in response to the U.S. Particle Physics Project Prioritization Panel (PS) Report which recommended to: Reassess the Muon Accelerator Program (MAP). Incorporate into the GARD program the MAP activities that are of general importance to accelerator R&D, and consult with international partners on the early termination of MICE. In particular, the recommends to "realign activities in accelerator R&D with the P5 strategic plan. Redirect muon collider R&D and consult with international partners on the early termination of the MICE muon cooling R&D facility." A key outcome of the review was the action item: Present to DOE a detailed plan for Step 3π/2 by 15 September 2014. This report describes that plan, aims for the completion of MAP-supported participation in the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) with a demonstration of the full cooling process, including RF on the 2017 timescale. It also targets a rapid ramp-down of the other elements of the MAP research effort over the next year. 2. Overview Overview by Ken Long and Mark Palmer The Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment proposal a deployment of the ionization cooling channel elements to support an experimental program in 6 steps (see Figure 1) at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory. The optics were based on the 201 MHz RF SFOFO cooling channel that was developed as part of the US Feasibility Study II. Table 1 summarizes the key top-level experimental deliverables that would be provided by each step.
From 14-09-08 MICE Project Plan Major US MICE Deliverable dates to RAL are: March 24, 2015 – completion of partial deliveries of Partial Return Yoke (PFY) for Step IV March 1, 2016 – delivery of Partial Return Yoke (PFY) for Step 3π/2 escalated this to to ship all PRY 3π/2 parts to RAL by January 2016 also need to re-name RF Unit & RFCC#1 => RF Module #1 and RF Module #2 August 1, 2016 – delivery of MICE RF Module #1 and Module #2 Revised UK Risk Analysis - Roy, Alan G. 5. Conclusion Overall impacts and plans for MAP effort (including MICE) given the $9M-$6M-$3M budget profile.
Availability of Program Information The National Guard Internal Review Office in each State and Territory (which reports to the USPFO) can provide information about risk assessments and audits performed by their office which may be helpful in planning the audit. Contact Mr. Derrick Miller, National Guard Bureau Internal Review Office, at (703) 607-0755, DSN 327-0755 or email for information on the Internal Review Office for a particular State. III. COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS In developing the audit procedures to test compliance with the requirements for this Federal program, the auditor must determine, from the following summary (also included in Part 2, “Matrix of Compliance Requirements”), which of the 12 types of compliance requirements apply, and then determine which of the applicable requirements is likely to have a direct and material effect on the Federal program at the auditee. For each such requirement, the auditor must use Part 3 (which includes generic details about each compliance requirement other than Special Tests and Provisions) and this program supplement (which includes any program-specific requirements) to perform the audit. A. Activities Allowed or Unallowed B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles C. Cash Management E. Eligibility F. Equipment and Real Property Management G. Matching, of Effort, Earmarking H. Period of Performance I. Procurement and Suspension and Debarment J. Program Income L. Reporting M. Subrecipient Monitoring N. Special and Provisions Y Y Y N N Y Y Y N Y Y N A. Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable activities are those designated as authorized in the Appendices of the MCCA. B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles 1. Allowable costs under MCCAs are stated in NGR 5-1, Chapter 5, Paragraph 5-3. 2. Indirect are unallowable except as stated in NGR 5-1, Chapter 5, Paragraph 5-3b. G. Matching, of Effort, Earmarking 1. Matching a. Grantee match is specified in the Project Design Finance Plan section of the ANG MCCA Technical Appendix and in the Project Construction Budget section of the ARNG MCCA Technical Appendix.
1 The learner will know how dogs react to rewards The learner must know: Assessment Requirements Evidence Location 1.a Rewards that dogs may like Learners should indicate a minimum of one reward that dogs may like. The following assessment methods can be used in the assessment of this standard: tasks/questions and answers questions and answers discussion or pictorial information This list is not exhaustive and other appropriate assessment methods may be used. 1.b Something a dog can be taught using rewards Learners should indicate a minimum of one thing a dog can be taught using rewards. 2 The learner will be able to reward dogs The learner must be able to: Assessment Requirements Evidence Location
If yes, when and what action did you take: Has there been any improvements: During which times does the dog bark regularly? Midnight – 7am □ 7am – Noon □ Noon – 7pm □ 7pm – Midnight □ When does the dog bark? When owners leave the property □ When owners are at home □ Other: What is the dog barking at? Postman □ Neighbours dogs, cats and/or children □ Dogs passing the property □ People passing the property □ When I am in the backyard □ Nothing □ Other What area of the property is the dog barking at? Front □ Back □ Side of fence line □ Other: PAGE 3 When the dog barks what is it doing? Runs along the fence at the □ □ Back □ Side of property □ Jumps at the fence at the □ Front □ Back □ Side of property □ Sits or stands in one spot □ Other Amounts of dogs involved:
“necessary” are to be understood as involving not coercion but the due obedience which genuine believers, in so far as they are reborn, render not by coercion or compulsion of the law but from a spontaneous spirit because they are “no longer under the law but under grace.” 17 We also reject and condemn as offensive and as subversive of Christian discipline that bald statement that good works are detrimental to salvation. 18 Especially in these last times, it is just as necessary to exhort people to Christian discipline and good works, and to remind them how necessary it is that they exercise themselves in good works as an evidence of their faith and their gratitude toward God, as it is to warn against mingling good works in the article of justification. Such an Epicurean dream concerning faith can damn people as much as a papistic and Pharisaic confidence in one’s own works and merit.
SV-11 Physical Schema – Option 1: Power source to consumer transmission FIGURE SV-11: – 1: SV-11 Physical Schema – Option 2: Power geographically dispersed FIGURE SV-11: – 2: SV-11 Physical Schema – Option 3: Congestion alleviation FIGURE SV-11: – 3:
National Consensus Standard for Configuration Management ANSI/GEIA Standard EIA American National Standards Institute Architecture and Standards Review Group (ASRG) CONOPS DoD CIO Feb 2010 Systems and software engineering — Architecture description ISO/IEC WD4 42010 IEEE P42010/D5 Jan 2009 Military Handbook Configuration Management Guidance DUSD (AT&L) Feb 2001
Configuration Status Accounting CR Tracker (CRT) CRs are tracked via system that records all actions, plans, status, and dispositions for CRs. The CR tracker has the following fields: Table 61. CRT Fields Definition Values No. Sequential number for / DM2 action items and change requests assigned by the DoDAF / DM2 WG secretariat. Natural numbers title of action item or change request for convenient reference by WG. Text Description Action item or change request as submitted by submitter. Text Date Submitted Date submitted. dd mmm yyyy Source Submitter individual, group, venue, etc. Text Source Organization Submitter organization. Text CI The Configuration Item to which the CR pertains. DoDAF Viewpoint, DoDAF Model, and / or DM2 Data Group / Model / Viewpoint The DoDAF Viewpoint(s), Model(s) and / or DM2 Data Group(s) to which this CR pertains. Operational, Capability, System, Service, Project, Standard, Data and Information, All AV-x, OV-x, CV-x, SV-x, SvcV-x, StdV-x, PV-x, DIV-x Performer, Resource Flow, Services, Capabilities Measures, Locations, Foundation (IDEAS), Pedigree, Metadata, Reification, Information and Data LOE Estimated Level of Effort to resolve High, Medium, Low Priority FAC and Working Group priority for resolution of CR High, Medium, Low. Core Process Category Core process(es) that requires the requested change or that is potentially impacted by the CR. CPM, DAS, JCIDS, OPS, PPBE, SE.
22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 SAMPLE DOG CARE LOG 2 Starting Date: ____/____/____ Ending Date: ____/____/____ Feeding Food Food Exercise Training Body Veterinary Date Schedule Types Amount Periods Schedule Weight Grooming Bathing Care Costs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
If yes, how secure is the garden? Is it private or communal? Have you ever owned dogs before? Please provide information on breed, length of ownership, age and any medical/ behavioural issues. Yes No Are there currently any pets in your home? Yes No (Please note that we prefer with no pets) If you currently have a dog/s or cat/s are they neutered? Yes No Please give details of the breed and ages of all current pets. Do they have up to date vaccinations? Yes No Do you currently, or have you ever, volunteered at any other animal welfare charities? If yes, please provide details. (Please note that your answer to this question will not influence our decision when assessing your application). How long are you able to commit to being a Battersea dog foster carer? Please give details of any commitments in the next 12 months which would stop you being available to foster. 6-12 months 12 months + (Please note we ask for at least 6 months commitment) How long are you willing to foster an individual dog for? 1-2 weeks 3-6 weeks 6-12 weeks 13 weeks + On average, how long would the dog be left on its own for each day? Are you able to travel to the Battersea site for regular check-ups, introductions and socialising sessions? Yes No Please provide any days or times you would not be available:
Do you have access to a car for these journeys? Yes No Do you have access to a computer to complete our regular foster updates? Yes No Do you have equipment to take and send photographs of the foster dog to us to assist in the rehoming process? Yes No Animal Experience Have you had experience with rescue dogs before? If yes, please provide further details. Would you be happy to foster dogs who may have to follow specific training programmes or may have behavioural issues such as food possession? Battersea will provide full training on addressing these behaviours. Yes No Would you be happy to foster a dog who is not house-trained? Many of the dogs who come to Battersea are strays and we don’t know if they are house-trained until they are in a home environment. We will offer advice and support to all fosterers. Yes No Would you be happy to foster a dog with medical needs? Yes No Are you happy to foster any breed of dog? Many of the dogs who require a foster home are Bull or Guarding breeds. Yes No Motivations Why would you like to be a dog foster carer for Battersea Dogs & Cats Home? Please provide information on why you feel you would be able to offer our dogs a good foster home.