Fri AM – Comment resolution Location CIDs Fri PM1 – Motions, Comment resolution: Motions on Thursday CIDs Any available CIDs Discuss the agenda – will post updated draft in 11-15/744r3 Approved draft plan without objection. Editor Report Review doc 11-13/95r22 Slide 9 - 8 editorials objected – there is a disagreement and will need to review one at a time Slide 9 – 9 editorials that have reworked and need to review based on a subsequent submission noting some differences with how the editor indicated the change will be made. Slide 9 – Editorials – objected, submission-required – need a submission to be able to resolve the issue – look for the comment group in the spreadsheet. 10 – Speculative editing has started 660/955 have been edited – 295 left to edit as well as the technical edits to be done later. Slide 11 – list of assignees – need to be updated as assignments are made. Slide 14 – list of CID needing review/discussion – will add to Wednesday PM1 agenda (which had a partial list). Comment Resolution: CID 6385 Review Doc page Review Doc 11-15/0739r1 (minutes from telecons) CID 5120 and 6384 MAC – need review The resolution looks ok Resolutions have not been put in database yet. MAC AdHoc needs to be updated first - CID 6383 GEN Revise resolution: REVISED (GEN: 2015-06-17 16:35:33Z) - Delete the dot11GASReceivedFragmentCount and dot11GASTransmittedFragmentCount variables/attributes from the MIB. Mark Ready for Motion – Comment Group: CID 6382 (EDITOR) and 5063 (MAC) Review CIDs and the discussion notes and subsequent CIDs with Type Related CIDs have had a discussion on reflector (Youhan KIM (Qualcomm) joined the WebEx call Review draft for context in Figure 8-251 The impact of the “sub-type” change is or at least the estimate is not significant There are 67 hits of “of type” to consider. The “Type” Subfield is the concern that should be considered. A
That completes this document – R2 will be posted shortly. – plan to motion during Friday PM1. Action item review – Dorothy to check with Youhan on CID 5899 and 5902 – yes or no -- ok Separate question is on the HT legacy operation. Concern expressed with proposed plan. Review the CIDs proposed text and comment again Discussion on if the comment scope allows for more extensive changes or not. Action Item: Mark was concerned with text, he was charged with providing alternate text for consideration in the future, but for now the resolutions will be considered as agreed before. Reviewed the agenda for next sessions and added an agenda item for future logistics for discussion on Friday. Recess at 11:31am PT REVmc BRC at Intel Jones Farm office – Hillsboro, Oregon -18 June 2015 - PM1 Called to order at 1:02pm PT by Dorothy STANLEY (HP) Review Patent Policy No issues identified. Attendance: Dorothy STANLEY (HP), Adrian STEPHENS (Intel), Emily QI (Intel), Edward AU (Marvel); Jon ROSDAHL (CSR); Mark RISON (Samsung); Graham Smith (SRT Wireless); Review Agenda: Motions Comment Resolutions: 11-15-762 –(Mark RISON) Remaining: similar to 5308, Editorials objected: Discuss: 6740, 6776, 6836, 6844, Review: 5308, 5357, 6248 + all the “Style” comment groups (Adrian STEPHENS) GEN review tab in (Jon ROSDAHL) RAC: CIDs 6896, 6897, 6898; 6877 (Jon ROSDAHL) CIDs 5190, 5191, 5192 –11-15-0761 (Stephen MCCANN) Motions: Motion #131 MAC-AO tab Approve the comment resolutions in 11-15/565r6 () “Motion MAC-AO” tab (4 comments discussed on telecons & Portland) and incorporate the indicated text changes into the draft. Moved Adrian STEPHENS 2nd: Edward AU Discussion: None Results – Y:5 N:0 A:0 Motion passes
REVmc BRC at Intel Jones Farm office – Hillsboro, Oregon -18 June 2015 – PM2 Called to order at 3:30pm PT by Dorothy STANLEY (HP) Review Patent Policy No issues identified. Attendance: Dorothy STANLEY (HP), Adrian STEPHENS Emily QI (Intel), Edward AU (Marvel); Jon ROSDAHL (CSR); Mark RISON (Samsung); Dan HARKINS (HP); Youhan KIM (Qualcomm); Dick ROY(SRA); Review Agenda: 11-15/744r4() Security CIDS Review 11-15/763 () Dan HARKINS CID 6507 (MAC) Review Comment HMAC convention question Discussion on the reason for having the HMAC-MD5 Proposed Resolution: Revised; change it to “The construction of descriptors for uses of the SHA family of hash functions…” More discussion on what format the should be in. What is HMAC-MD5? – Normative reference B26 (2640) Question on if we use IETF RFC 2104 terminology? Two opinions are colliding – The Proposed change uses “descriptors” but should be “description”. Update the Proposed Resolution: Revised; change it to “The construction of descriptions for uses of the SHA family of hash functions…” Mark Ready for Motion CID 6349 (MAC) Review Comment Question on what is used with RSN? Discussion on the MESH use of RSN and GTKSA are different. Review 1926.22 – of security associations by an RSNA STA. Is the “Mesh” prefix needed for the Security types to see if it is different, so merging the terms would be a lot of work. Proposed Resolution: Revised – Delete 13-16 on page 103. 103.36 insert “Mesh GTKSA, Mesh TKSA, and Mesh PMKSA” after "(IGTKSA)" If pairwise master key security association (PMKSA) caching is not enabled, deauthentication also At 103.38 change the sentence to: If pairwise master key security association (PMKSA) caching
Mark Ready for Motion CID 6510 (MAC) Review comment Similar to previous comment, but on different section. 11.3.4.3.2 Proposed Resolution: Revised; incorporate text changes as shown in 11-15/0764r2 () for section 11.3.4.3.2. Not ready for motion – more discussion requested. Mark FOR “REVIEW” CID 6285 (MAC) Review comment Review context Proposed Resolution: Accept Mark for Motion Review Agenda for tomorrow – 11-15/744r4: Fri AM1 – Comment resolution Location CIDs 11-15-766 – Carlos Aldana CIDs 5190, 5191, 5192 -Stephen McCann, see 11-15-0761 GEN review tab Additional Editorials needing RAC: CIDs 6896, 6897, 6898; 6877 Fri PM1 – Motions, Comment resolution: Proposed Motion : Approve the comment resolutions in “Motion Ed Vancouver”, “Motion Ed Telecon”, “Motion Ed Hillsboro A” and “Motion Ed Hillsboro B” tabs and incorporate the indicated text changes into the draft, except for 6506 (Vancouver A). Motions on Thursday CIDs Motion Ed Hillsboro A Comment Resolution on Any available CIDs AOB Logistics – next meetings, including August face to face week of August 17th; location: Cambridge, Piscataway NJ, Bay area Security will be topic on the next REVmc Telecon on June 26th. Note: Jon and Mark, both indicated that they would not be on the call on the 26th June. Recess at 5:04pm PT REVmc BRC at Intel Jones Farm office – Hillsboro, Oregon -19 June 2015 - AM1 Called to order at 9:00am PT by Dorothy STANLEY (HP) Review Patent Policy
No issues identified. Attendance: Dorothy STANLEY (HP), Adrian STEPHENS Emily QI (Intel), Edward AU (Marvel); Jon ROSDAHL (CSR); For part of the time: Ganesh Venkatesan (Intel); Carlos Aldana (Qualcomm); Graham Smith (SRT Wireless); Stephen MCCAAN (BlackBerry); Mark Rison (Samsung); Review Agenda: Fri AM1 – Comment resolution Location CIDs 11-15/766, 11-15/687 & 11-15/719– Carlos Aldana CIDs 5190, 5191, 5192 -Stephen McCann, see 11-15-0761 GEN review tab Additional Editorials needing input RAC: CIDs 6896, 6897, 6898; 6877 Added documents to Agenda plan for Location CID discussion Agenda – approved without objection Location CIDs – Carlos ALDANA (Qualcomm) Review Document 11-15/766r0 This document contains the proposed resolutions to CIDs 5049, 5179, 5185, 5188, 6244, 6283, 6312, 6313, 6316, 6330, 6354, and 6356. CID 5179, 5185, 6283 (MAC) Review comments Proposed resolution for all 3 CIDs: Revised; incorporate the changes in doc 11-15/766r1 () in the section “CIDs 5179, 5185, and 6283.” No objection – Mark Ready for Motion CID 5188 (MAC) Review comment Proposed resolution: Rejected: Robust frames do not solve the privacy problem. Any changes made to FTM should address both privacy and security. No objection – Mark Ready for Motion CID 6244 (MAC) Review comment MCS32 is HT-duplicate format Proposed resolution: Revised; Add "MCS 32 in format," before "or HT-greenfield format" at 1740.35 No objection – Mark for Motion CID 6316 (MAC) Review Comment Proposed Resolution: make the following change in Section 10.24.6.4: Change "without correcting the offset" to “without applying any correction factor
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/15/11-15-0764-02-000m-resolution-of-some-security-comments.docx. Friday: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/15/11-15-0758-01-000m-sb0-stephens-resolutions-part-1.doc