11401 Bin Tian 400.7 "the cyclic shift value for the L-STF, L-LTF, L-SIG, RL-SIG and fields of the PPDU". CSD is also applied to the HE-SIGB for MU PPDU as in the comment Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID11401 in doc 11597 Dorothy Stanley 400.6 On Pg 346, line 56, BEAM_CHANGE is "Not present" for formats other than HE_SU or HE_EXT_SU. So how is this determined for HE MU PPDU or HE TB PPDU? as in comment Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID11597 in doc 11599 Dorothy Stanley 400.21 On Pg 346, line 56, BEAM_CHANGE is "Not present" for formats other than HE_SU or HE_EXT_SU. So how is this determined for HE MU PPDU or HE TB PPDU? as in comment Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID11599 in doc Dorothy Stanley 400.34 On Pg 346, line 56, BEAM_CHANGE is "Not present" for formats other than HE_SU or HE_EXT_SU. So how is this determined for HE MU PPDU or HE TB PPDU? as in comment Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID11600 in doc 11610 Dorothy Stanley 401.47 On Pg 346, line 56, BEAM_CHANGE is "Not present" for formats other than HE_SU or HE_EXT_SU. So how is this determined for HE MU PPDU or HE TB PPDU? as in comment Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID11610 in doc Dorothy Stanley 403.21 On Pg 346, line 56, BEAM_CHANGE is "Not present" for as in comment Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID11619 in doc 28.3.10
On P406L40 (CID #11628): If the TXVECTOR parameter BEAM_CHANGE is 1 , the time domain representation of the RL-SIG fieldshall be as specified in Equation (28-14). On P421L18(CID #11640): If the TXVECTOR parameter BEAM_CHANGE is 1 , the time domain waveform for the HE-SIG-A field of an HE SU PPDU, HE MU PPDU and HE TB PPDUshall be as specified in Equation (28-16). 11598 Dorothy Stanley 400.12 On Pg 346, line 56, BEAM_CHANGE is "Not present" for formats other than HE_SU or HE_EXT_SU. So how is this determined for HE MU PPDU or HE TB PPDU? as in comment Rejected. BEAM_CHANGE set to 0 does not to HE MU PPDU and HE TB PPDU. 11605 Dorothy Stanley 401.16 On Pg 346, line 56, BEAM_CHANGE is "Not present" for formats than HE_SU or HE_EXT_SU. So how is this determined for HE MU PPDU or HE TB PPDU? as in comment Rejected. Reason as above Dorothy Stanley 402.12 On Pg 346, line 56, BEAM_CHANGE is "Not present" for formats other than HE_SU or HE_EXT_SU. So how is this determined for HE MU PPDU or HE TB PPDU? as in comment Rejected. Reason as above 11623 Dorothy Stanley 404.11 On Pg 346, line 56, BEAM_CHANGE is "Not present" for formats other than HE_SU or HE_EXT_SU. So how is this determined for HE MU PPDU or HE TB PPDU? as in comment Rejected. Reason as above
11631 Dorothy Stanley 404.53 On Pg 346, line 56, BEAM_CHANGE is "Not present" for formats other than HE_SU or HE_EXT_SU. So how is this determined for HE MU PPDU or HE TB PPDU? as in comment Rejected. Reasons as above 11518 Dorothy Stanley 419.64 On Pg 346, line 56, BEAM_CHANGE is "Not present" for formats than HE_SU or HE_EXT_SU. So how is this determined for HE MU PPDU or HE TB PPDU? as in comment Rejected. Reasons as above 11601 Dorothy Stanley 400.40 In Clause 28.3.4 says: "In the HE TB PPDU, the pre-HE modulated fields, which include L-LTF, L-SIG, and HESIGA fields, are sent only on the 20 MHz channels where the STA's HE modulated fields are located." I don't see how this equation matches this statement for UL MU. There needs to be a per-user component for UL MU. This equation needs to be modeled like Eq 28-4. Best would be to create separate equations for UL MU. as in comment Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID11601 in doc 11602 Dorothy Stanley 400.40 its not clear in an HE TB PPDU for a user with an RU <=242 in a 40, 80, or 160/80+80MHz as in comment Rejected. In Clause 28.3.4 , it states that "In the HE TB PPDU, the pre-HE
no User field is present corresponding to this RU Allocation Table . Please clarify in spec. RU in case of HE MU preamble puncturing. 14074 Youhan Kim 421.48 Common field is not always present Clarify that Common field is not always present Rejected. It is stated in the spec in the following paragraph that “When the SIGB Compression in the HE-SIG-A field of an HE MU PPDU is set to 1 (indicating full bandwidth transmission), the Common field is not present and the HE-SIG-B content channel consists of only the User Specific field.” 11528 Dorothy Stanley 425.41 what is N_SR? Lets define or provide references to definitions of all the variables. As in comment Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID11528 in doc 11529 Dorothy Stanley 425.58 I don't see N_20MHz used in Eq. 28-20. As in comment Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID11529 in doc ax editor: please make the following change in D2.1 Clause 28.3.10.8.4 On P427L39 (CID Please add the following on P427L46 tone MIMO
to each 20 MHz subchannel.." Discussions: The extra coefficients selected out of or at tone indices which are null but shall have the HE-STF coefficients after mapping M sequences to each 20 MHz subchannel referes to the HE-STF sequence values assigned to tones inside center 26-tone RUs for 80MHz, 160MHz or 80+80MHz transmission. The sentence can be improved for better readability. ax editor: please make the following change in D2.1 Clause 28.3.10.9 On P436L6 (CID #11413,CID #13480) The HE-STF field is constructed the M sequence(s) multiplied by or or tone indices which are . 11414 Bin Tian 435.49 Please use more accurate description of alpha_r in P397L8 as in the comment Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID11414 in doc Yan Zhang 435.49 The statement " alpha_r is the power boost factor for the RU. A STA shall support alpha_r in the range [0.7, sqrt(2) ]. A STA may support in the range [0.5, 2]. " is inconsistent with the definition in 28.3.9 (Mathematical description of signals). Change to " alpha_r is defined in 28.3.9 (Mathematical description of signals)." Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID13377 in doc 13481 Sigurd 435.49 Note that the power "boost" of alpha_r is still normalized by beta_r. As such, is it correct to state that alpha_r is the value of the power boost? Do the ranges apply to alpha_r or to the normalized value of alpha_r? Clarify Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID13481 in doc 13363 Ron porat 435.49 The max to minimum alllowed is 2 but in page 435 if sqrt(2)/0.7 is slightly greater than Change line 49 as "A STA shall support aalpha_r in the range Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID13363 in doc
2. May be better to define it as [1/sqrt2, sqr(2)] Discussions: Although is still normalized by, the term is common to all RUs. Hence, it is correct to say that is the power boost factor for the r-th RU. The correct definition of is givein in 28.3.9. ax editor: please make the following change in D2.1 Clause 28.3.10.9 On P437L49 (CID #11414) 11533 Dorothy Stanley 434.15 Eq 28-22 is not clear. Both equations have a value at HES_0. The top equation has the value (1+j)/sqrt(2), but bottom equation has the value 0. Which is it? As in comment Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID11533 in doc 11534 Dorothy Stanley 434.64 Eq 28-28 is not Both equations have a value at HES_248 and HES_-248. The top equation has the value (1+j)/sqrt(2) and (-1-j)/sqrt(2), but bottom equation has the value 0. Which is it? As in comment Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID11534 in doc 11535 Dorothy Stanley 435.01 Eq 28-29 is not Both equations have a value at HES_504 and HES_-504. Which is it? As in comment Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID11535 in doc 11642 Dorothy Stanley 435.14 Eq 28-30 is not clear. Both equations have a value at HES_1016 and HES_-1016 and HES_8 and HES_-8. Which is it? As in comment Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID11642 in doc 11643 Dorothy Stanley 435.27 Eq 28-31 is not clear. Both equations have a value at HES_504 and As in comment Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID11643 in doc