zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Shoplifting-: 1. 31/12/17. Mid morning offence. Westmoreland Road. Suspects entered shop taking bottles of alcohol and several other items from the shelves. They placed these in their sleeves and ran out the shop making no attempt to pay. Local Police Contact details: Telephone - External: 02087212614 |  Telephone - Radio: 405798  Mail: Albemarle House, Unit 3, Albemarle Road, Bromley, BR3 5LN E-mail:
Position in organisation Email Telephone Mobile: Amount Applied for (Max.£500) Please indicate which of the following Crimebeat Objectives your project will aim to address: Cut crime and keep young people out of trouble Provide Support to Victims of Stimulate an interest in voluntary work Improve school attendance and behaviour Improve the quality of life in your community Please tell us what your project will do. (Max 300 How will you do it? (Please include details of any partner organisations/agencies you will be working with). (Max. 300 words)
Weisburd et al, “Do Stop, Question, and Practices Deter Crime?” WEEK 6 Monday, February 26 – Institutions and Strategies II: Prosecution and Courts [78] Readings: Wilson & Petersilia, Crime and Public Policy: Ch. 15 – “Prosecution” and Ch. 16 –“Sentencing” Kleiman, When Brute Force Fails: Ch. 6 – “Designing Enforcement Strategies” Wednesday, February 28 – Midterm Review Day **MIDTERM EXAM DISTRIBUTED; DUE ONE WEEK FROM THIS DATE.** WEEK 7 Monday, March 5 – Institutions and Strategies III: Prisons and Jails [22] Readings: Wilson & Petersilia, Crime and Public Policy: Ch. 18 – “Prisons” Wednesday, March 7 – Institutions and Strategies IV: Community Corrections [154] **MIDTERM DUE BY CLASS TIME** Readings: Wilson & Petersilia, Crime and Public Policy: Ch. 17 – “Community Corrections: Probation, Parole, and Prisoner Reentry” Hawken et. al., “Managing Drug-Involved Offenders” Lattimore, “HOPE Demonstration Field Experiment” Kilmer, “Efficacy of Frequent Monitoring With Swift, Certain, and Modest Sanctions for Violations: Insights From South Dakota’s 24/7 Sobriety Project” Corbett, “The Burdens of Leniency: The Changing Face of Probation” WEEK 8 12 – 18: No Class, Spring Recess WEEK 9 Monday, March 19 – Institutions and Strategies V: Re-Entry and Re-Integration [61] Readings: Hawken & Kleiman, “Graduated Reintegration, Smoothing the Transition from Prison to Community” Kleiman, “Justice Reinvestment in Community Supervision” pp. 651-659 Wilson & Petersilia, Crime and Public Policy: Ch. 11 – “Rehabilitation and Treatment Programs”
Southern Wiltshire Neighbourhood Policing Team Alderbury & Laverstock beat local crime reports. The list provides a summary of recent local crimes from 1st to 31st October 2015. It is not possible to list all the crimes due to confidentially issues (e.g. if the crime was violent or for domestic disputes). Please find below a selection of the 69 incidents reported to Police in our beat this month. There are 34 reported crimes this month with 35 non crime reports. Alderbury 17th – Criminal damage – Suspects have put glue in door lock rendering it unusable. 19th – Theft – Bicycle stolen from front garden. 31st – Criminal damage – Noticeboard damaged, suspect identified. Clarendon No reported incidents Farley No reported incidents Firsdown 23rd – – Heating oil stolen from tank. Ford 19th – Theft – Fuel syphoned from a number of vehicles in yard. Grimsteads 8th – Theft – Metal piping picked up on driveway, suspect challenged and left empty handed. Landford No reported incidents Laverstock No reported incidents Old Sarum 18th – Criminal damage – Car window smashed, nothing stolen. 25th – Criminal damage – Secure compound entered numerous vehicles damaged. Pitton No reported incidents West Dean No reported incidents Whiteparish 21st – Theft – Large amount of timber stolen from secure yard. 25th – Criminal damage – Car window smashed, nothing stolen. 25th – Criminal damage – Car window smashed, located next to vehicle above. 30th – Criminal damage – Vehicle driven around damaging crops, vehicle abandoned. 31st – Burglary – Window forced, antiques and silverware taken. Winterslow 3rd – Theft – Chemical toilet stolen from outside address. 9th – Criminal damage – Keys to 2x padlocks snapped off within locks. 13th – Theft – Koi carp stolen from outside pond whilst householders away. 14th – Theft – 2x Cement mixers stolen from rear garden. Team Changes As some of you may be aware Guy has moved stations, he is still working for Wiltshire Police but at a station nearer to his home, this means that a replacement is now with us. PCSO Tina Roylance has finished her training and is now based at Alderbury police station with the team. I am sure you will make her feel welcome as she gets to know the area. Your Local Neighbourhood Policing Team details PC 1594 Henry Clissold & PCSO 3961 Tina Roylance Email:
Crime and Punishment Revision Booklet GCSE EDUQAS WJEC History Course CHANGES IN CRIME AND PUNISHMENT IN BRITAIN, c.500 to the present day Check list How well do I understand the following topics: Good Not sure on some areas Missed this topic to catch up Causes of What have been the main causes of crime over time? need – trial
1 The learner will know why young people become involved in crime The learner must know: Assessment Requirements Evidence Location 1.a Why young people become involved in crime Learners should identify why people become involved in crime The following assessment methods can be used in the assessment of this standard: Written and answers Oral questions and answers Group discussion Written or pictorial information This list is not exhaustive and other appropriate assessment methods may be used. 2 The learner will know about the consequences of crime for different people The learner must know: Assessment Requirements Evidence Location
Cost of Turnover Worksheet Complete this form separately for each type of position. Position: ____________________________ Hrly Rate: _____________ Times Filled Per Year: _______ PER HIRE COSTS Direct Labor Costs: ________________ Application Processing Interview Analysis & Selection Hiring Costs: ________________ Drug Screening Background Check Agency Fees Other (Relocation, etc.) Wages during Orientation: ________________ Direct Compensation Indirect Compensation Support Staff Costs (Per Hire): ________________ Accounting Time HR/Benefits Time Supply Costs (Per Hire): ________________ Safety Equipment Uniforms Other Supplies (Business Cards, Vehicle, etc.) Lost Productivity (Per Hire): ________________ Identify Days to Full Productivity Calculate as # * hrly rate * 50% * 8 hrs/day OTHER COSTS Training Costs (Annual): ________________ General Orientation Time Specific Job Training Time Training Materials Calculate * # Groups Trained/Year Overtime Costs (Annual): ________________ Due to short staffing Recruiting Costs (Annual): ________________ Generic or Targeted Ads Other (Job Fairs, etc.) ANNUAL COST CALCULATIONS Per Hire Total Costs: ________________ x Number Hired Per Year: ________________ = ________________ + Other Costs (Annual Total): ________________ = TOTAL ANNUAL COSTS ________________ Note: This is Per Position in Organization.
Description of Variant Service (as elaborated in Annex A of Schedule 4.1 (Supplier Solution) Price of Variant Service Service Variant description 1: The charges are for telephone helpline, hardware and software support and software updates. Unit Price (£’s); £99 Unit of charge (e.g per practice, per device, per patient etc); Per Practice Time period (e.g.one-off charge, per month, per quarter ,per annum etc.) Per Annum Service Variant description 2: N/A Unit Price (£’s); Unit of charge (e.g per practice, per device, per patient etc); Time period (e.g.one-off charge, per month, per quarter ,per annum etc.) Service Variant description 3: N/A Unit (£’s); Unit of charge (e.g per practice, per device, per patient etc); Time period (e.g.one-off charge, per month, per quarter, per annum etc.) ETC. ETC. Integrations with Principal Clinical System Providers Where there is a current or proposed integration with a Principal Clinical System Provider, details should be provided of any price differences that apply for: Compliant / non-compliant Lot 1 integrations or variations; and Price Variations that are dependent on the identity of the Principal Clinical System Provider NONE Invoicing Terms Invoice frequency (e.g. monthly, quarterly, annually) Support is invoiced quarterly in arrears Invoice delivery period (e.g. 5 working days after end on month; 15th of month following service period etc.)1st of the month following service delivery invoicing terms: N/A
EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY CRIMINAL JUSTICE ANALYST SALARY AND BENEFITS $20.65-$24.86 hourly, plus benefits package FILING DEADLINE 5:00 p.m., September 28, 2018 DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES The Criminal Justice Analyst provides para-professional assistance in the analysis, implementation, and monitoring of specific programs, establishes and reviews quality assurance measures, evaluates the efficiency and effectiveness of programs with the goal of developing strategies to improve the local criminal justice system. The major duties of the job include: Evaluate in-custody, alternative custody, and community supervision programs by use of statistical tracking of data and trends to develop strategies to maintain evidence based programs. Perform data mining, monitoring, analysis, and create detailed reports that will be utilized by administrative staff to make strategic decisions. Develop comprehensive and efficient methods for collecting and monitoring data. Collect, summarize, aggregate and analyze data from various sources to prepare reports. May be assigned to special criminal justice committees to assist in program development., research program legislation, develop staff reports, compile program data and provide written or oral reports. Monitor compliance with state and federal mandates, analyze program goals and achievements and recommend changes as necessary. Develop data collection protocols and document the flow of defendants through the criminal justice system. Prepare reports on complex issues that present objective, rational findings on which policy decision can be made. Produce annual agency and quarterly monitoring reports for management. Provide technical assistance and support in regards to data collection, identification, measurement indicators and quality assurance. Conduct trainings related to data collection, analysis and quality assurance. Maintain and write a variety of records, reports and correspondence. Conduct surveys and perform complex research and statistical analysis and prepare reports as directed. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS
Floor Plans Available: *Please note that Habitat for Humanity cannot guarantee a specific floor plan to applicants. Open, one bath (576 sq. ft) One bed, one bath (720 sq. ft) One bed + bed niche, one bath (792 sq.ft)
APPLICANT QUESTIONS (CONTINUED) Have you lived and/or worked in Orange County, NC for the past 12 months? Yes____ No____ If no, are you connected to Orange County (family, Senior Center, volunteer, etc.)? Yes____ No____ Please describe your connection to Orange County: Do you smoke? Yes_______ No_______ Do you have pets? Yes______ No_______ If yes, what kind and how many? ___________________________________________ Employment Information for the past 2 years for the Applicant Current Employer Address (City, State, Zip) Start Date Hourly Wage & Number of Hours Previous Employer Address (City, State, Zip) Start Date End Date
The 5th Amendment “no one shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself…” History, Policy, and Rationales: 1. Judge Friendly’s Warning: Beware of “eloquent phrasing that bypasses analytical thought” It Generally hurts Only applies to those who have broken the law, typically Occasionally allows an innocent to be quiet avoiding bad performance It is natural that when a question is posed, people feel a moral obligation to respond This rule is contrary And prevents convictions, restitution to victim 2. Cruel Trilemma: Argument: The Rule was created to avoid one being placed in a position, if under oath: 1. Incriminate themselves 2. If lied, perjure themselves 3. If stayed silent, would be in contempt Note: Rationale is the strongest one Explains why brought to all proceedings, not just criminal…explains distinction with testimonial and non testimonial evidence, with the former ‘testimony’ and the person being a witness against himself subject to the cruelty of trillema while latter not But, premised largely on the Religious, supernatural effect of the oath…not really applicable anymore… Alschuler: “The Peculiar Privilege” At common law, religious damnation, and supernatural sanctions for falsely invoking God’s name, were risked as well as imprisonment if under oath and lied Damned your soul Oath was coercive “Rack by Conscience” and considered torture Just the same as physical torture, if not more! At Common Law then, there was no right to silence, but instead right to method information gathered In fact—they didn’t have counsel then, so they had to speak the “Rack by Conscience” by not putting them under oath, which is typically what happened Solution: This exists whenever a witness doesn’t want to testify, although perhaps not incriminating themselves, it incriminates someone Don’t put them oath, as CL did Avoid Perjury Europe: trial
ANS: unnecessary REF: p. 37 2. Denying bail or pretrial release to a defendant because they are dangerous is called ____________ detention. ANS: preventive REF: p. 39 3. In addition to the Bill of Rights, there are other sources of rights for the defendant, including state constitutions and federal and state ____________. ANS: laws REF: p. 33 4. A writ directed to a officer requiring that officer to notify a person that they are required to appear in court and answer a charge is called a ____________. ANS: summons REF: p. 35 5. The ___________ warnings do not have to be by the officer after an arrest unless the arrested person is asked questions by the officer that tend to incriminate. ANS: Miranda REF: p. 37 6. A crime punishable by death or imprisonment of more than one year is called a ____________. ANS: felony REF: p. 61 7. The process in which prospective jurors are questioned by the judge and/or lawyers to determine whether or not there are grounds for challenge is called ____________. ANS: voir dire REF: p. 51 8. Release on recognizance means that an accused has been released without bail. ANS: monetary REF: p. 39 9. The prosecution in a criminal case is required to prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a ____________ doubt. ANS: reasonable REF: p. 53 10. If the magistrate does not find probable cause at the preliminary hearing/examining the judge will order the ____________ of the defendant. ANS: discharge REF: p. 42 11. A()n ________ plea is a guilty plea the defendant still maintains innocence. ANS: Alford 12. A plea of nolo contendere literally no ________.
Sources of Law Potential Sources of Criminal Procedure James Madison, The Federalist Papers, No. 10 most US criminal procedure law is judge-made Constitutional law Contrasts with most of rest of world, where statutory rules prevail binding on law enforcement at every level History of rights early common law defendants put on the stand and asked whether he committed crime, jury to decide whether telling the truth no defense lawyers allowed – thought that they would just mislead the jury around 1700 – right to hire defense attorney (not provided) around 1750 – abuses by English king lead to some reforms Entick v. Carrington – a trespass in government officials entering the plaintiff's home and breaking open his boxes and examining his papers, court held that search warrant was not valid without some proof to back it up, i.e., probable cause 1770s – American Revolution, US Constitution Bill of Rights responds directly to English king’s abuses 4th Am. – no unreasonable searches or seizures; warrants only on probable and no general warrants (must be specific) 5th Am. – cannot be compelled to be a witness against yourself 6th Am. – trial rights (speedy, jury, etc.); assistance of counsel Late – Constitution begins to be applied to the states 14th amendment, reconstruction, ect. Early 1900s – police force grows rapidly, becomes professional – SCOTUS toying with Due Process Clause to restrict states through the Bill of Rights Powell v. Alabama (1932) – All citizens have 14th Am. DP rights, which is meaningless without a lawyer (can’t say 6th Am. violated directly b/c doesn’t apply to the states) Palo v. CT (1937) – rights incorporated if “implicit in concept of ordered liberty Adamson (1947) – “required by immutable principles of justice as conceived by a civilized society” Duncan (1968) – “fundamental to the scheme of American justice Rochin v. California (1952) – police forcibly pump suspect’s stomach to get the drugs he swallowed; police conduct that “shocks the conscience” violates DP 1960s – Warren Court, procedural revolution 4th Am. incorporated – Wolf v. CO (1949) incorporates, Mapp (1961) recognizes remedy for violation 5th, 6th Am. incorporated 2nd Am. Maybe incorporated? Heller – striking down DC handgun ban; individual to own handgun in your home for self-defense McDonald v. City of Chicago (pending) trial
1. 3 2. 3 3. I 4 4. DFAT 4 5. I AFP 5 6. I 5 7. 6 8. 6 9. 6 10. I DFAT 7 11. 7 12. I I 8 13. I 8 14. I 9 15. DFAT NGO 10 A A A A A A A A A A INDIVIDUAL
Attachment B ASSESSMENT FORM TEMPLATE SUGGESTION Name of Person Description of the position the person occupies or will occupy The person provided an original or certified copy of all relevant National Police Checks Outcome of NPC/Stat Dec checks National Police Checks Required: Name of Country Date NPC Received NPC authenticity checked (Y/N) NPC disclosed no convictions (Y/N) NPC disclosed a conviction requiring further assessment. Refer to Attachment XX Did disclosed conviction preclude individual from employment? (Y/N) Name of Country Date Stat Dec/equivalent was signed Applicant disclosed no convictions (Y/N) Applicant disclosed a conviction requiring further assessment. Refer to Attachment XX Did disclosed conviction preclude individual from employment? (Y/N)
January 8, 2015 Notice of Government Code Section 70633(b) Authorization to Charge for Copy and Certification Fees Historically, it has been the Court’s policy to waive the costs of copy and certification fees for criminal court records when requests were from government agencies. Recently, due to the ongoing impacts of budget reductions, the Court has determined that it will no longer provide copies and certifications of criminal records at no charge to government agencies. Government Code Section 70633(b) provides statutory authority for courts to charge government agencies for certifications and copies of all criminal records. A number of courts, like Santa Cruz, have implemented new policies in accordance with this Government Code section. Effective July 1, 2015, please be advised that the Court will charge copy and certification fees for criminal court records to government agencies making such requests. In addition, the Court will require each agency to pay in advance for the records. Fees are as follows: Copy Fees - $.50 per printed page, pursuant to Government Code Section 70627(a) Certification Fees - $25.00 per document, pursuant to Government Code Section 70626(a)(4). Agencies may contact the Court to establish drawdown payment accounts if they are unable to pay with cash, check, or money order. Requests: Agencies may email, mail, or make requests in person using the court’s Research Copy Request Form. The form can be found on the Court’s Website at Santa Cruz Superior Court Attn: Criminal Records Division 701 Ocean Street, Room 120 Santa Cruz, CA 95060 Email: criminalrecords.info@santacruzcourt.org Thank you for your attention to this information and please contact the Court at the above address if you have questions.
facts relating to the Aboriginal person charged with an offence or before the court. Explain to the client the importance of complying with the conditions of their disposition. The Native Criminal Court Worker will clarify the meaning of forms or measures such as probation, bail/recognizance/undertaking, conditional release, community service orders etc. The Native Criminal Court Worker will not supervise bail, probation, Community Service Orders or custody and supervision orders. Provide oral submissions when requested by the client or justice personnel with approval from the client and/ or with guidance from legal counsel acting for the accused. Ensure that the courts are aware of the provision and its appropriateness when dealing with an Aboriginal offender within the Canadian Criminal Code and to reference the principles of Gladue (Section 718.2 (e)). Ensure that there is a working relationship with the Community Justice Coordinator to ensure that all clients meeting the criteria are diverted at the earliest stage of the process. Liaise with other agencies including Legal Aid, Defense Attorneys, and the Crown as required, and advocate for client needs. Attend Indigenous Peoples’ Court and scheduled regional courts, as required. Restorative Justice Programs: Support the Restorative Justice Programs, including the Indigenous Community Council, Youth Justice Committee, Indigenous Peoples’ Court, and Gladue Programs, by: communicating regularly with the program staff, providing diversion referrals, and conducting follow up activities in collaboration with the program staff. Advocate the Restorative Justice Programs as a primary option for eligible clients. Collaborate with Coordinator of Justice Services in the identification of clients appropriate for diversion referrals. Promote the Restorative Justice Programs to mainstream justice personnel by explaining and advocating the diversion process and client eligibility criteria. Promote the Restorative Justice Programs to community members, Friendship Centre staff, and service providers. Ensure that all necessary paperwork is completed in advance of submitting referrals. Provide diversion applications immediately to the Coordinator of Justice Service’s attention. Attend and participate in weekly Justice Program team meetings. Resources Outside the Courts: Attend meetings, workshops, seminars and conferences that relate to the Native Criminal Court Worker duties. Participate as a resource person at training sessions, committee meetings, etc., to ensure that information on the culture, needs, concerns and aspirations of Indigenous people are
Degree Course Number Course Name Hours Representative Crosswalk Course Numbers at UA System Institutions Associate of Science (60 hours) EVSY 1001 University Success Seminar 1 EDGE 1003 (UACCH) ENGL 1013 English Comp I 3 ENGL 1113 (CCCUA), ENG 1013 (UACCM), ENGL 1013 (UAM) MATH 113 Quantitative Literacy 3 MATH 1321 (UALR) PHIL 2003 Professional Ethics 3 MGMT 2200 (UAPB) SOCI 1013 Intro to Sociology 3 SOC2003 (CCCUA), SOCI2753 (UAFS), SOC2213 (UAM) ENGL 2023 Technical Writing 3 ENG 1003 (UACCM), ENGL 3253 (UAM), RHET 1312 (UALR), ENGL 1023 (UAF), ENGL 1213 (UAFS) BIOL 1014 Life Science I 4 BIOL 1014 (CCCUA) BIOL 1114 Life Science II 4 BIOL 1114 (CCCUA) PSYC 1103 Intro to Psychology 3 PSYC 2003 (CCCUA), PSY2003 (UACCM), PSY1163 (UAFS), PSY1013 (UAM) PHIL 1003 and Critical Thinking 3 PHIL 2350 (UALR)
Counting rule Count the client only once regardless of the number of supports received during the reporting period. Monitoring frequency Quarterly Data source(s) collection Quarterly Data Collection Definition of terms A client is defined as a person with a disability who is in contact with the criminal justice system or who is at risk of coming into contact with the system. Data collection information Data collection name Data management system Data set Reporting cycle Quarterly Data Collection (QDC) CRISSP, QDC-Tool or other QDC – minimum data set Quarterly Key documents Mandatory For Department of Health and Human Services: <https://intranet.dhhs.vic.gov.au/disability-justice-practice-guidelines-legal-policy-and-practice> To receive this publication in an accessible format, email <sacomms@dhhs.vic.gov.au> Authorised and published by the Victorian Government, 1 Treasury Place, Melbourne. © State of Victoria, Department of Health and Human Services, 1 July 2018. Where the term ‘Aboriginal’ is used it refers to both Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Indigenous is retained when it is part of the title of a report, program or quotation. ISSN 2207-8347 (online) Available on the department’s <http://providers.dhhs.vic.gov.au/human-services-activity-search>
plan, look up banks- accessory before the fact (A&A/accomplice) hide perp from the police after robbery- accessory after the fact (accessory after the fact) accomplice is the theory that allows the defendant to be charged for the original crime not guilty of being an accomplice different roles may get different sentences, but they are all guilty of the same crime D can be guilty of the as an accomplice even if principal is not (dies, immunity, found not guilty) Prosecution to show that the crime was committed and that D did their part D can also be guilty as an accomplice to an attempt- if crime not completed- even if the accomplice could not commit the crime themselves (ck last part- in notes- what does this mean?) Why accomplice liability? Purposes of punishment- mens rea Worried that more crimes will be carried out if more people are involved Should hold the brains behind the operation liable too, not just the last guy (left holding the bag Elements Actus reas- helped Mens rea (2 parts) Knowingly help Purpose for the crime to succeed Purpose can be inferred from knowledge Fountain case- p 600- One inmate had a in his waistband when the other walked by. Inmate 1 lifted his shirt to reveal the knife, and stepped forward in his cell to allow inmate 2 to grab it and stab the guard. Pros did not need to prove Inmate 1 had the purpose for inmate 2 to kill the guard since he knew when he helped 2 get the knife it would be used for that purpose. The that actually occurred or a “reasonably foreseeable crime” (added later)(rob book store then rob but rob book store than sets it on fire- prob not) Focus on mens rea first (??) If mens rea for the is negligent, the accomplice mens rea drops to negligent also (MPC and C/L?) Can aid and abet for strict liability crime? Ex accomplice to statutory rape- gaps in the law are filled by prosecutors exercising discretion (no clear answer) Words are enough for a conspiracy- encouragement Just being there is not enough unless there is a prior agreement
D charged w/ failing to register as convicted felon in LA. She had no notice of reporting requirement and claimed ignorance of law. Court held that narrow circumstances like this case allows that defense. Other cases include: Defendant conduct is wholly passive. There was no actual notice of the law The violation involves a regulatory defense. MPC Approach to Mistake of Law A belief that conduct does not legally constitute an offense is a defense to a prosecution for that offense based upon such conduct when; he acts in reasonable reliance upon an official statement of the law, afterward determined to be invalid or erroneous, contained in: a statute or other enactment; a judicial decision, opinion or judgment; an administrative order or grant of permission; OR an official interpretation of the public officer or body charged by law with responsibility for the interpretation, administration or enforcement of the law defining the offense. CHAPTER 7: CRIMINAL HOMICIDE Common Law Murder: The unlawful killing of a human being by another human being Categories for Common Law Homicide Offenses: Murder Malice aforethought 1st or 2nd degree Manslaughter Voluntary Manslaughter (mitigated murder) Involuntary Manslaughter-reckless or negligent killing. Common Law Mens Rea for Murder Requires Intent to kill. Intent can be implied through depraved murder rule or felony murder rule. Malice Aforethought: Intent to Kill Express Malice=Intent to Kill How to prove express malice? Statement/confession Circumstantial evidence Natural and probable consequences rule Deadly weapon rule (i.e. pointing deadly weapon at a vital organ) Implied Malice
b. ex post law c. substantive law d. procedural law 17. The ______________ was articulated by the U.S. Supreme in its 1965 decision, Griswold v. Connecticut. a. and unusual punishment rule b. right of privacy rule c. equal protection rule d. double jeopardy rule 18. The ________________ Amendment to the U.S. Constitution prohibits the imposition of cruel and unusual punishment. a. Sixth b. Fifth c. Eighth d. Fourth 19. Which of the following refers to other constitutional guarantees before, during, and after a criminal trial? a. due process b. equal protection c. cruel and unusual punishment d. procedural law 20. The United States subscribes to the ______________ system of law. a. inquisitorial b. domestic
short confinement in a jail. 34. ___________________ A step in a judicial proceeding, petitioning a higher court to review a lower court’s decision. 35. ___________________ The American Law Institute’s systemized statement of criminal law that was proposed in 1962. Its provisions are suggested as models for state criminal law revisions. 36. ___________________ The body of law that provides the legal methods and procedures by which substantive law is to be enforced. 37. ___________________ A government official whose duty is to initiate and maintain criminal proceedings on behalf of the government against persons accused of committing crimes. 38. ___________________ Punishment that is prohibited by the Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. 39. ___________________ The philosophy that offenders should receive the punishment they deserve in light of the crimes they committed. 40. ___________________ A penalty or punishment that is imposed on a person in order to enforce the law. 41. ___________________ Punishment philosophy that attempts to reform the offender through education, work, or other appropriate treatment modalities. 42. ___________________ Literally, “let the decision stand.” 43. ___________________ The statutes that define behavior considered to be a threat to the well-being of society. The accused must be prosecuted by the government. 44. ___________________ Decisions based on one’s judgment rather than legal rules. 45. ___________________ The process that occurs when appellate courts review and interpret the acts that occur in the lower courts.
The economic costs of drug abuse and drug-related crime are horrendous. Economic damage affects individuals, families, the workplace, the police, the courts, and the prisons and jails. It affects communities, schools, and universities. All effects are negative. Drug trafficking is difficult to detect and frequently involves violence. Money laundering is a common behavior related to drug trafficking, as profits must be hidden. Enforcement is complicated by the ineffectiveness of the justice systems in nations where drug cartels function at will. There are many responses to drug trafficking and abuse. Some of the policy initiatives are on the federal level; others are on the state and local levels. Critics focus on the costs of the war on drugs and the negative consequences it has caused. Learning Objectives After studying this chapter the student will: Be able to discuss the problem of defining drug abuse. Be able to describe the impact of drug on communities, on infant mortality, and on infant abuse as well as the economic cost of drug abuse. Be able to discuss the impact of drug use and abuse on the criminal justice. system. Be able to define money laundering. Be able to discuss the history of the war on drugs from the national perspective. Be able to explain substance abuse and treatment programs at the state level.
b. arson c. larceny-theft d. burglary 7. ________________ refers to the theft of an auto by use of force or the threat of force, especially force involving a deadly weapon. a. Carjacking b. Motor vehicle theft c. Hijacking d. Joyriding 8. Which crime involves the stealing of a person’s social security number, possibly along with other personal identifiers such as a bank account number, and using that information to steal from the person? a. cyberstalking b. extortion c. conversion d. identity theft 9. What type of crime targets individuals willing to “invest” their savings and other assets in order to make the promised “big bucks?” a. conversion b. identity theft c. extortion d. fraud against the elderly 10. In June 2010 the FBI announced which nationwide project that targets mortgage fraudsters?
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Big Five: Mapp, Katz, Miranda, Terry, & Gideon Powell v. Alabama (1932) - is the first modern criminal procedure Takeaway: to counsel is absolute; seen as a restraint on federal government. Previously, the S.Ct. had seen that the 14th Amendment limited: “you can’t do this.” After Powell, Due process also has affirmative content, requiring courts to do something to protect defendants. Palko v. Connecticut p. 27 - Plaintiff indicted for murder, found guilty of 2nd degree murder, and sentenced to life. Connecticut appealed, took evidence out, retried him, and he was convicted of 1st degree and sentenced to death. At the federal this would violate Double Jeopardy, but protection from double jeopardy is not a fundamental right, and was not incorporated into the 14th Amendment. Sentence upheld. The central proposition is that “due process of law requires only that criminal trials be fundamentally fair.” Adamson v. California - p. 29 -Defendant did not testify in trial and the prosecutor used it against him (violation of self-incrimination 5th Amendment). The Court said that the State may choose to control the trial however it thought the most efficient administration of criminal justice. -Blacks Dissent: Argued for complete and absolute application of the Bill of Rights into the 14th Amendment. Duncan v. Louisiana (1968)- p. 37 - Plaintiff was charged with battery and requested a jury trial. State law said jury trials were only available for charges involving capital punishment or imprisonment with hard labor. Louisiana said that holding the fourteenth amendment to assure a right to a jury trial would cast doubt on the integrity of every trial conducted without a jury. In a 7-to-2 decision, the Court held that the Sixth Amendment guarantee of trial by jury in criminal cases was "fundamental to the American scheme of justice," and that the states were obligated under the Fourteenth Amendment to provide such trials. Petty crimes, defined as those punishable by no more than six months in prison and a $500 fine, were not subject to trial,
Court- community caretaking can extend to vehicles but NOT here. The individual was the passenger, not the driver. There was someone else who could have helped him. Court is sensitive to fact police might claim to see someone in ‘distress.’ Test: Nature and level of distress exhibited by the ind Location of ind Whether the ind was alone/had access to assistance independent of the offered by the officer To what extent the ind presented a danger to himself or others Cady v. Dombrowski – police entered house when they saw door open. Found drugs in plain view. Held that community caretaking exception applied. Probs w/ this exception – police might use this as pretext for going into anyone’s house. Pretext doesn’t matter as long as police can LATER objectively ID a non-criminal investigative purpose. Warrantless Search Requirements: Probable Cause Search incident to arrest Hot pursuit Plain view Plain touch Automobile search Exigent circumstances No Probable Cause/Reasonable Suspicion Inventory search – no suspicion just policy Border crossings – NO suspicion Roadblocks and checkpoints – NO suspicion Consent – NO suspicion Probation and parole – probation reasonable suspicion – parole NO suspicion Admin searches Drug testing – RANDOM drug testing no suspicion School searches - individual locker – reasonable; underwear – something more Community caretaking – no suspicion SEIZURES & ARRESTS Topics Arrest – lengthy seizure Terry Stops – temporary detentions to see if crime is afoot, pat down for weapons. A lot of power & a lot less suspicion needed. Consensual Encounters – NOT seizures Requirements for diff levels of interaction w/ police: Arrest PC Temp detention reasonable suspicion “Consensual encounters” no suspicion. Approach Was it a seizure What kind of seizure was it Look at things like where are they being stopped? If they put handcuffs on you, surround you, take you into another room etc. it’s NOT consensual. Was the proper level of suspicion What can police do during that type of seizure 1. Was It A Seizure?
Req’s reasonable belief consent given by someone who could properly give consent due to “common authority” – apparent authority suffices “Common authority” on mutual use of property by persons generally having joint access or control for most purposes Often comes down to whether police entitled to make reasonable assump about co-occupants R.E.P. Specific Instances of Third Party Consent Husband-Wife – no per se rule; assume authority exists, but can be rebutted (for certain of premises) – US v. Duran Parent Child Child living at home – head of house can consent to search of room; maybe diff if it is an adult Child may allow mere entry, but cannot consent to search of entire home Landlord-Tenant – LL cannot consent to search of residence, only common areas Hotel Employee cannot consent to search of guest room Employer-Employee Employer consent depends on expectation of privacy in area Employee consent depends on their authority (position) Joint Tenant can consent to search of entire house user can give consent to search (Frazier v. Cupp) Limits to Third Party Consent Antagonism –courts (essentially need a want to put other person in jail) Gonzalez v. – where have spite, no right to waive spouse’s protection Martin – equal auth doesn’t lapse/revive with amicable relations Defendant’s Instructions If police know, search NOT allowed If police do not know, search is good Refusal/Failure to Consent Georgia v. Randolph (2006) – H refused, removed; W consented – invalid If not present to make objection, the lose out on ability to object Other options if cant search – deliver evidence, give info for PC, exigency Scope of Consent FL v. Jimeno – objective reasonableness; what would a normal person have understood to be the consent Search of person (Rodney) – cannot be more intrusive than Terry Is Second Search Allowed? Nawrock – consent allowed search at any time after CAR impounded Brochu – where passage of time greater and second search involved re-entry of HOME, search not allowed. If get consent and all evidence, then warrant obtained before consent probably now invalid. SUPERVISORY POWER AND EXCLUSIONARY RULE
EXHIBIT A Schedule of Deed Restrictions Deed Restriction Effective Date Lucas County Record Declaration of Restrictions for Crimson Hollow Plat One, Subdivision in the Township of Monclova, Lucas County, Ohio 08/31/01 015070D07 – 012070E04 Declaration of Restrictions for Crimson Hollow Plat Two, Subdivision in the Township of Monclova, Lucas County, Ohio 08/01/03 20030818-0055180 Declaration of Restrictions for Crimson Hollow Plat Three, Subdivision in the Township of Monclova, Lucas County, Ohio 01/04/05 20050105-0000910 Declaration of Restrictions for Crimson Hollow Plat Four, Subdivision in the Township of Monclova, Lucas County, Ohio 06/12/06 20060621-0040703 Declaration of Restrictions for Crimson Hollow Plat Five, Subdivision in the Township of Monclova, Lucas County, Ohio 05/15/12 20120529-0024833 Declaration of Restrictions for Crimson Hollow Plat Six, Subdivision in the Township of Monclova, Lucas County, Ohio 12/16/12 20121212-0060322 Declaration of Restrictions for Crimson Hollow Plat Seven, Subdivision in the Township of Monclova, Lucas County, Ohio 01/23/14 20140123-0002310
Session 15 October 9, 2013 Police: Issues and Challenges Chapter 6 None N/A Session 16 October 14, 2013 Police Issues and Challenges Chapter 6 Quiz 7 Sunday October 20, 2013 at 11:59 pm Session 17 October 16, 2013 Video: Gideon’s Trumpet None None N/A Session 18 October 21, 2013 Test #2 None None N/A Session 19 October 23, 2013 The Courts Chapter 7 Research Paper #2 Sunday November 3, 2013 at 11:59 pm Session 20 October 28, 2013 The Courts Chapter 7 Quiz 8 Sunday November 3, 2013 at 11:59 pm Session 21 October 30, 2013 The Courtroom Work Group and Criminal Chapter 8 None N/A Session 22 November 4, 2013 The Courtroom Work and Criminal Trial Chapter 8 Quiz 9 Sunday November 10, 2013 at 11:59 Session 23 November 6, 2013 Sentencing Chapter 9 None N/A Session 24 November 11, 2013 Sentencing Chapter 9 Quiz 10 Sunday November 17, 2013 at 11:59 pm Session 25 November 13, 2013 Test #3 None Test #3 In Class Session 26 November 18, 2013 Probation, Parole and Community Corrections Chapter 10 None N/A Session 27 November 20, 2013 Probation, Parole and Community Corrections Chapter 10 Quiz 11 Sunday November 24, 2013 at 11:59 pm Session 28 November 25, 2013 Prisons and Chapter 11 None
Session 29 December 2, 2013 Prisons and Jails Chapter 11 Quiz 12 Sunday December 1, 2013 at 11:59 pm Session 30 December 4, 2013 Prison Life Chapter 12 Research #3 Sunday December 8, 2013 at 11:59 pm Session 31 December 9, 2013 Prison Life Chapter 12 Quiz 13 Wednesday December 11, 2013 at 11:59 pm Session 32 December 11, 2013 Final Exam None Test #4 In Class
Taylor-Thompson, Criminal Law, Fall 2011 INTRODUCTION Formula: (Actus reus + mens rea + circumstance + causation + result) – defenses element not actually necessary for every crime, but is a good broad framework Purposes of crim law: Maintain order and prevent future wrongs Indulge retributive impulses for past wrongs Address the problem that led to the crime Proscribe conduct according to and convey society’s notions of morality Prevent arbitrariness by giving notice of what people can and can’t do Crim law directed at: The criminal The public – creates deterrence and educates on society’s values The government – shows the extent and limits of its power, and guides legislation Lawrence v. Texas: Gov’t can’t punish private acts that don’t harm society and that punish a particular group Tension btwn protecting individual’s liberty and society’s liberty to be free from certain acts Why do we punish? Deterrence – prevent future crime General (keep others from committing the same crime) –ve: Assumes potential offenders will engage in C/B analysis – in reality, studies show Ds don’t they’ll get caught Assumes people know the law they’re breaking Subject to abuse – punishing groups more likely to commit a crime Some crimes are undeterrable, like crimes of passion Specific (keep the individual from doing it again) –ve: Won’t work if people go back to same structure that led them to crime Imprisoning doesn’t improve D’s ability not to commit a crime Punish D more severely if fits into demographic w/ higher crime rate Incapacitation – take offender out of circulation +ve: Makes no assumptions about human nature: commit crime go to jail Best solution for repeat offenders (unless are repeat b/c of structural issues) –ve: Above isn’t true – we ARE assuming the criminal would commit more crime if didn’t go to jail Also implies the assumption that those we imprison for longer are the most likely to commit future crimes Doesn’t address the cause of crime Another person might just take the criminal’s place Prisoner might learn how to be more effective criminal while in jail Problems w/ the prison system generally trial
Crest Student Handbook 2016-2017 Welcome 3 Administration 3 Absences 3 Academic Information--Meaning of Grades 3 Activities 4 Admit Slip 4 Announcements 4 Attendance 4 Attendance Diploma 4 Bulletin Boards 4 Class Load and Eligibility 4 Class Schedule Changes 5 Counseling/Guidance Services 5 Daily School Procedures 5 Directory Information 5 Dress Code (Recommended) 5 Driving During School Hours 6 Dropping Out or Transfers 6 Early Dismissals 6 Eligibility and Absence Guideline 6 Fire and Tornado Drills 6 Grading System/Class Rank 7 Crest High School Graduation Requirements 7 Regents Recommended Curriculum 7 Honor Rolls 8 Incomplete Grades & Conditions ………………………………………………………………………………....8 Junior Senior Formal and Prom 8 Leaving School during Session 8 Lockers 8 Locker Searches 8 Lost and Found 8 Lunch and Lunch Period 8 Medicines at School 8 National Society 9 Membership in National Society 9 Crest High School Honor Society Membership Selection 9
Chillers The summary impacts of the proposals are shown below in terms of the energy savings and greenhouse gas emission reductions. For chillers there is no difference between proposals B1 and B2 so they are combined in the tables below. Summary of key energy/emission impacts and cost benefits by proposal Australia Proposal Energy Saved (cumulative GWh to 2030) GHG Emission Reduction (cumulative) Mt Total Benefit ($M) Investment ($M) Net Benefit ($M) BCR Proposal A 135 0.1 $24 $4 $20 6.4 Proposal B1/B2 1,336 1.2 $255 $28 $226 9.0 Note: This table uses discount rates of 7% for Australia New Zealand Proposal Energy Saved (cumulative GWh to 2030) GHG Emission Reduction (cumulative) kt Total Benefit ($M) Total Investment ($M) Net Benefit ($M) BCR Proposal A 7 0.7 $1 $1 $1 2.6 Proposal B1/B2 64 6.4 $13 $4 $10 3.6 Note: This table uses discount rates of 5% for New Zealand Summary Energy Savings and Emissions Reductions by Proposal Australia Proposal Energy Savings (GWh pa) in 2020 Energy Savings (GWh pa) in 2030 Energy Savings Cumulative 2030 (GWh) GHG Reduction Cumulative (kt CO2-e) Proposal A 5 18 135 120 Proposal B1/B2 49 182 1,336 1,199 New Zealand Proposal Energy Savings (GWh pa) in 2020 Energy Savings (GWh pa) in 2030 Energy Savings Cumulative 2030 (GWh) GHG Reduction Cumulative (kt CO2-e) Proposal A 0 1 7 1 Proposal B1/B2 2 9 64 6 Proposal A – Detail by state/region and category
Sensitivity tests: higher and lower incremental costs Australia – 50% increase of incremental costs Proposal Energy Saved (cumulative GWh to 2030) GHG Emission Reduction (cumulative) Mt Total Benefit ($M) Total Investment ($M) Net Benefit ($M) BCR Proposal A 135 0.1 $24 $6 $18 4.3 Proposal B1/B2 1,336 1.2 $255 $42 $212 6.0 Note: This table uses discount rates of 7% for Australia New Zealand – 50% increase of incremental costs Proposal Energy Saved (cumulative GWh to 2030) GHG Emission Reduction (cumulative) kt Total Benefit ($M) Total Investment ($M) Net Benefit ($M) BCR Proposal A 7 0.7 $1 $1 $1 1.8 Proposal B1/B2 64 6.4 $13 $5 $8 2.4 Note: This table uses discount rates of 5% for New Zealand Australia – 50% decrease of incremental costs Proposal Energy Saved (cumulative GWh to 2030) GHG Emission Reduction (cumulative) Mt Total Benefit ($M) Total Investment ($M) Net Benefit ($M) BCR Proposal A 135 0.1 $24 $2 $22 12.2 Proposal B1/B2 1,336 1.2 $255 $14 $240 17.9 Note: This table uses discount rates of 7% for Australia New Zealand – 50% decrease of incremental costs Proposal Energy (cumulative GWh to 2030) GHG Emission Reduction (cumulative) kt Total Benefit ($M) Total Investment ($M) Net Benefit ($M) BCR Proposal A 7 0.7 $1 $0 $1 4.7 Proposal B1/B2 64 6.4 $13 $2 $11 7.2 Note: This table uses discount rates of 5% for New Zealand