zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Microalgae Plant-IROST 2009 Microalgae Pilot Plant-Qeshm Islamd 2002 Microalgae plant-IROST 2009 Microalgae pilot plant-IROST 2009 6.1.7. IROST Open Ponds Design IROST cultivation process was developed in an open pond, with sea water and direct sunlight. Open ponds are the oldest and simplest systems for mass cultivation of microalgae. In this system, the shallow pond is usually with about 1 foot deep; algae are cultured under conditions identical to the natural environment. The pond is usually designed in a “raceway” or “track” configuration, in which a paddlewheel provides circulation and mixing of the algal cells and nutrients. Cultivation processes are broken up into blocks called fields. Each field is almost 100 hectare contains the reactor beds, algae inoculation and nutrient source, CO2 source, circulation pumps, and harvest sumps. Each field contains 300 x 3000 m² reactor bed. 6.1.8. The process of Microalgae Conversion into Biofuel
Draft Chapter 7.X WELFARE OF WORKING EQUIDS Article 7.X.1. Preamble In many countries, working equids, used for transport and traction, contribute directly and indirectly to households’ livelihoods and benefit communities as a whole. More specifically, they contribute to agricultural production and food security by transporting, for instance, and fodder for other livestock, firewood and other daily needs to the homestead, agricultural products to the market; they provide draught power for agricultural work such as ploughing, harrowing and seeding, weeding and transport; they supply manure and, in some cases, milk, meat and hides for household use or income (FAO, 2014). Working equids may be of direct or indirect use in commercial activities such as taxi services, construction, tourism and transporting goods. They can also be rented out and provide an income for the equid’s owner and a small business opportunity for the hirer (FAO, 2014). In the case of the latter there can potentially be an increased animal welfare risk. Finally, working equids relieve the physical burden of women and children and less able people in transport of domestic needs; they may strengthen social relationships within extended families and communities through sharing working animals at times of need, for example during ploughing and harvesting seasons. They transport people to health centres and medical supplies to remote areas and may also form an important part of weddings or ceremonial occasions (FAO, 2014) (The Brooke 2014). The welfare of these working equids is often poor and this may be as a result of their ownership by poor and marginalised communities who are unable to sufficiently resource their needs. Certain working contexts may present a particular risk to welfare such as working within construction industries (e.g. brick kilns). Article 7.X.2. Scope and definition This chapter applies to the following working animals: horses, mules and donkeys which are used for traction and transport, for income generation as well as domestic use (non-commercial work). Equids used in sports or competitions, leisure riding or research are excluded. Article 7.X.3. Responsibilities and competencies 1. Veterinary Authority The Veterinary Authority is the responsible for implementation of animal health and welfare. In the case of working equids, responsibility may be shared with other government agencies and institutions as listed below and including but is not limited to those responsible for agriculture and transport. 2. Other government agencies
Crosswind/Tailwind Component Criteria (see Appendix A). Other Safety Considerations. When considering operational advantage with respect to runway use, the air traffic control facility must develop and implement written Runway Use Plans that proactively consider current and developing wind conditions and include clearly defined crosswind/tailwind criteria, including wind gusts. (See Appendix A). Considerations peculiar to a specific aircraft regularly utilizing the airport must also be considered to the extent that they can be identified. Safety considerations must be applied in developing a runway use program are listed in Appendix A. Appendix A provides a list of safety considerations that must be evaluated when developing crosswind and tailwind limits. may be other considerations peculiar to the airport, a specific runway, or an aircraft that regularly uses the airport that are not listed. It is the responsibility of the RSST to identify and evaluate any additional considerations it considers appropriate. h. Requests for Waivers Should include documentation of all considerations contained within this Must include participants to the RSST. Shall be submitted to Service Area Operations Support Group (OSG) and regional All Weather Operations Program Manager (AWOPM). Shall be jointly approved/disapproved by headquarters Air Traffic and Flight Standards. RESOURCES TBD – e.g. website repository RSST Team worksheets and records Airport Runway Wind Limits templates Advisory Circulars, Pilots Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge
Types of Acceptable Credentials: TEGL 10-16, Change 1: The following are acceptable types of credentials that count toward the credential attainment indicator: Secondary school diploma or recognized equivalent Associate’s degree Bachelor’s degree Graduate degree for purposes of the VR program Occupational licensure Occupational certificate, including Registered Apprenticeship and Career and Technical Education educational certificates Occupational certification Other recognized certificates of industry/occupational skills completion sufficient to qualify for entry-level or advancement in employment. CERTIFICATES/CREDENTIALS NOT INCLUDED ESD Policy 1020 Data Integrity and Performance Policy and Handbook: Credentials that do not include, but are not limited to: First aid cards Food handler’s card Non-commercial driver’s license Completion of WEXs Evan Rosenberg, Division of Youth Services, DOL ETA, “WIOA Youth Eligibility Live Q&A Session” on WorkforceGPS October 24, 2017: Even though DOL will not define what counts as a credential, Evan did the following common trainings do not count as a credential or occupational skills training: CPR OSHA 10 Work readiness Completion of assistive technology training program (screen reading software) related to hygiene and safety that are broadly required for entry level employment YES: Secondary school diploma or recognized equivalent Associate’s degree Bachelor’s degree Occupational licensure Occupational certificate, including Registered Apprenticeship and Career and Technical Education educational certificates Occupational certification recognized certificates of industry/occupational skills completion sufficient to qualify for entry-level or advancement in employment. NO, Could Not Locate Reporting: Type of Credential Earned is recorded in MIS:(20 CFR 677.160) YES NO The correct Credential Earned is recorded in MIS (WIN 0082) YES NO Case notes document the date achieved, type of the Credential Earned and are aligned with data recorded in MIS: (WIN 0082; WIN 0088) YES, very detailed YES, some detail NO, case notes did not align with MIS NO, could not locate case notes for: Date credential earned Type of credential achieved Comments: Moving Forward: 5. CCWA PROGRAM COMPLETION
location apart from the participant’s regular program file. 7. Miscellaneous Observations observations & cOMMENTS Item to Address/ recommendations This element covers all observations not accounted for on this tool. Examples of “miscellaneous observations” may include, but are not limited to: Loose, unattached documents located in a hard file Medical references in the file of other program participants located in the file Other “miscellaneous observations” N/A Comments: No Action Required Item to Address/Action Required: Recommendation: Moving Forward:
DAI – Greg Little, OSD(C) DEAMS – Todd Baker, Air Force – Selester Copeland, USMC 11:15 – 12:00 The Federal Perspective Karen Pica, OMB(OFPP) Orange Ballroom D 12:00 – 1:00 Lunch and Exhibits Tuesday, April 3 - Afternoon 1:00 – 5:00 Break Out Sessions Orange A – Systems Orange C - FM Orange E - Enterprise Orange F - GFP Orange G - Data 1:00-1:50 Supplier Risk - SPRS Payment Instructions Contractor-Acquired Property BI – FPDS and PBIS iRAPT – What’s the Latest? 2:00-2:50 – Market Research Tool Demo Managing FM of Transactions Handshakes 2-4 Implementation (TBD) Reporting Grants & Cooperative Agreements – DAADS FedMall Implementation 2:50-3:10 and Exhibits 3:10-4:00 IAE – What You Need to Know Future of MOCAS Government Furnished Property Module End-to-End Improving Contract Quality SPS Update
11:30 – 12:00 Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) and the Data Lake LeAntha Sumpter, A&S/DPAP and Adarryl Roberts, DLA Orange Ballroom D 12:00 – 1:00 Lunch and Exhibits Wednesday, April 4 - Afternoon Orange A – Systems Orange C - FM Orange E - Enterprise Orange F - GFP Orange G - Data 1:00 – 1:50 REPEAT IAE Modernization – What You Need to Know DCMA/DCAA Roles and Responsibilities REPEAT Government-Furnished Property Attachment REPEAT Improving Contract Quality Standard Hierarchy/ Joint Appointment Module/Single 2:00 – 2:50 REPEAT Agency Administration for IAE Modernization Intragovernmental Transactions Solicitation Module Contracting Officer’s Representative Tracking Tool Clause Logic 2:50 – 3:10 Break and Exhibits 3:10 – 4:00 Capturing Performance (CPARS/FAPIIS) GEX Overview PDS/PRDS Schema Q&A What is the Data Lake and PIEE? REPEAT BI – FPDS and PBIS 4:10 – 5:00 REPEAT Supplier Risk – SPRS REPEAT Payment Instructions Managing DoDAACS in PIEE REPEAT Contract Closeout Initiatives EDA Tech Refresh
Abstract Background: Improved data linkages between diverse environment and health datasets have the potential to provide new insights into the health impacts of environmental exposures, including complex climate change processes. Initiatives that link and explore big data in the environment and health arenas are now being established. Objectives: To encourage advances in this nascent this article documents the development of a web browser application to facilitate such future research, the challenges encountered to date, and how they were addressed. Methods: A ‘storyboard approach’ was used to aid the initial design and development of the application. The application followed a 3-tier architecture: a spatial database server for storing and querying data, server-side code for processing and running models, and client-side browser code for user interaction and for displaying data and results. The browser was validated by reproducing previously published results from a regression analysis of time-series datasets of daily mortality, air pollution and temperature in London. Results: Data visualisation and analysis options of the application are presented. The main factors that shaped the development of the browser were: accessibility, open-source software, flexibility, efficiency, user-friendliness, licensing restrictions and data confidentiality, visualisation limitations, cost-effectiveness, and sustainability. Conclusions: Creating dedicated data and analysis resources, such as the one described here, will become an increasingly step in improving understanding of the complex interconnections between the environment and human health and wellbeing, whilst still ensuring appropriate confidentiality safeguards. The issues raised in this paper can inform the future development of similar tools by other researchers working in this field. Keywords Big data, browser application, health, environment, climate change, time-series regression Development of a browser application to foster research on linking climate and health datasets: challenges and opportunities Introduction
Table 2 Volume Part/Tab Title Evaluation Rating Page Limit Volume 1A Cover Letter Not Rated 1 page Volume 1A Phase 1 Part A - Solution Conformance (A1 - A4 above) Acceptable/ Unacceptable Maximum 3 pages Volume 1A Phase 1 Part B - Corporate Experience Attachment E: Past Performance Questionnaire Acceptable/ Unacceptable No Limit Volume 1B Phase 2 Part A – Attachment A: Business Capabilities and Data Standards Unacceptable No Limit Volume 1B Phase 2 Part A – Attachment B: Technical Capabilities Unacceptable No Limit Volume 1B Phase 2 Part A – Attachment C: FedRAMP (RAR) Unacceptable RAR - No Limit Volume 1B Phase 2 Part A – Security Unacceptable Maximum 2 pages Volume 1B Phase 2 Part A – Attachment F: VPAT Self Assessment Unacceptable No Limit
Volume 1B Phase 2 Part B – Program Management Approach Unacceptable Maximum 6 pages Volume 1B Phase 2 Part C – Software Maintenance – Continuous Improvement, Change Requests, and Defect Resolution Unacceptable Maximum 3 page Volume 1B Phase 2 Part D – Implementation – Implementation Support, Configuration Support, and Data Integration and Migration, and Training Support Unacceptable Maximum 13 page Volume 1B Phase 2 Part D – Implementation – Attachment D - RACI Matrix Unacceptable No Limit Volume 1B Phase 2 Part E – Attachment E – Past Performance Questionnaire Unacceptable No Limit Volume 1B Phase 2 Part F - Attachment G - Small Business Subcontracting Plan (if applicable) Unacceptable No Limit None Phase 3 Solution Capability Demonstration and Oral Presentation Unacceptable Maximum 2 and 1/2 hours per WSLM/Payroll solution
KSU – KU Sunflower Showdown Basketball Party Monday, February 10th McDowell, Tuttle & Alcove Rooms Complimentary refreshments beginning at 7:00pm, Tip-Off at 8:00pm. Sponsored by: Reception Tuesday, February 11th Flint Hills Discovery Center, 315 S. 3rd Street Complimentary refreshments; access to all museum exhibits. 6:00 – 8:00pm Sponsored by: Schedule at a Glance Monday, February 10 6:00 – 7:00pm Pre-Conference Tour of KSU College of Human Ecology Hoffman Lounge, 119 Justin Hall
Attachment C Infant Nursery and Family Services Programs Cost Proposal Personnel Salary Fringe Benefits FTEi 12-month budget Total Personnel Cost for 12months $ Non-personnel costs for 12- month period (Itemize the cost for all planned expenditures) Office supplies (example) Staff travel (example) Telephone personnel expenses for 12- month period $ Total Personnel Expenses for 12- month period $ 12-month proposed costs $ i Indicate the percentage of the salary (based on a 40-hour week for a 12-month period) for the staff members listed that will be dedicated to performing services under the resulting contract.
KSU – KU Sunflower Showdown Basketball Party Monday, February 10th McDowell, Tuttle & Alcove Rooms Complimentary refreshments beginning at 7:00pm, Tip-Off at 8:00pm. Sponsored by: Reception Tuesday, February 11th Flint Hills Discovery Center, 315 S. 3rd Street Complimentary refreshments; access to all museum exhibits. 6:00 – 8:00pm Sponsored by: Schedule at a Glance Monday, February 10 6:00 – 7:00pm Pre-Conference Tour of KSU College of Human Ecology Hoffman Lounge, 119 Justin Hall
KSDE Help Room Big Blue & Fort Riley Rooms (Hotel Side) The following KSDE Consultants will be available to assist with any CTE-related questions: Kurt Dillon (Agriculture), Angie Feyh (Pathways and Perkins Performance Indicators), Melissa Fast (STEM Cluster Lead), Kirk Haskins (Marketing, Finance, Business Management & Administration), Martin Kollman (Rigorous Programs of Study), Gayla Randel (Human Services, Arts AV Technology & Communications, Hospitality & Tourism, Education & Training), Peggy Torrens (Manufacturing, Architecture & Construction, Transportation Distribution & Logistics, Law Public Safety & Security). 11:50am – 12:50pm Lunch Kaw Nation & Big Basin Rooms 12:50pm Safe travels home
Career & Technical Education Annual February Conference February 7-8, 2017 Hilton Garden Inn & Manhattan Conference Center 410 South 3rd Street Manhattan, KS 66502 Sponsored by: Kansas Association of Education Service Agencies (KAESA)* *Members include: Clearwater – South Central Kansas Education Service Center ESSDACK – Educational Services and Staff Development Association of Central Kansas Greenbush – Southeast Kansas Education Service Center Keystone Learning Services Northwest Kansas Educational Service Center Smoky Hill Education Service Center Southwest Plains Regional Service Center In cooperation with: Kansas State Department of Education (KSDE) & Kansas Board of Regents (KBOR) KSU – KU Sunflower Showdown Basketball Watch Party Monday, February 6th McDowell, Tuttle, Alcove Rooms Complimentary refreshments, Tip-Off at 8:00pm Sponsored by:
11,900 units 210,474 sq.m 54,450 sq.m. APPENDIX II – PROJECT LISTS COUNTYWIDE Class 1: Community & Parks Blackrock Park Masterplan Fernhill Masterplan Marlay Masterplan Shanganagh Masterplan Cabinteely Masterplan Clonkeen Masterplan Dún Laoghaire Baths Jamestown Park, Stepaside (former landfill) Kilbogget Park – Sports Hub Library development programme Shanganagh Castle Recreational Facilities and Pitches Glenalbyn Pool Replacement Samuel Beckett Campus Stepaside Sports Hub Urban Parks & Open Spaces Regeneration Public Realm Village Improvement Schemes Class 2: Roads Traffic Management/Sustainable Travel Annual Traffic Works Programmes to include the following: Walking & Permeability New traffic signals and ITS strategy Junction upgrades Residential Speed Limits and Slow Zones Road Safety School Zones Cycle Network Infrastructure and Initiatives including Sutton to Sandycove Greenways Traffic Management Studies and Implementation Sustainable Travel (Delivery of Principles of the Design Manual for Urban Roads and Streets within existing road network) Road Refurbishment Minor Road Reconstruction Road and Footpath Improvements Flood Alleviation Road Improvement Schemes Leopardstown Link Road and Roundabout Reconfiguration Foxrock Village Carpark Blackglen Road/Harold’s Grange Road/College Road (phased development) M50 Foot/Cycle Bridge
Social Monday, February 9th McDowell, Tuttle & Alcove Rooms Complimentary Refreshments 7:00 – 9:00pm Sponsored by: Reception Tuesday, February 10th Flint Hills Discovery Center, 315 S. 3rd Street Complimentary refreshments; access to all museum exhibits 6:00 – 8:00pm Sponsored by: Schedule at a Glance Monday, February 9
4.7 PG6 Confirm recommendations contained in the tender evaluation report Review recommendations of the Bid Evaluation Committee and refer back to Bid Evaluation Committee for reconsideration or make recommendation for award Bid Adjudication Committee 5 Award contract 5.3 PG7 Award contract Formally accept the tender offer in writing and issue the contractor with a signed copy of the contract Director or delegate 5.5 GF1 Upload data in financial management and payment system Verify data and upload contractor’s particulars and data associated with the contract or order Director or delegate 6.4 PG8A Obtain approval to waive penalties or low performance damages. Approve waiver of penalties or low performance damages Director or delegate 6.5 PG8B Obtain approval to notify and refer a dispute to an adjudicator permission for the referral of a dispute to an adjudicator or for final settlement to an arbitrator or court of law Director or delegate 6 Administer contracts and confirm compliance requirements 6.6 PG8C Obtain approval to increase the total of prices, excluding contingencies and price adjustment for inflation, or the time for completion at the award of a contract or the issuing of an order up to a specified percentage21 Approve amount of time and cost overruns up to the threshold Director or delegate R200 000 Bid Adjudication Committee 6.7 PG8D Obtain approval to exceed the total of prices, excluding contingencies and price adjustment for inflation, or the time for completion at award of Approve amount of time and cost overruns the threshold Municipal Manager Inform Council of increase above the threshold Activity Sub-Activity (see Table 3 of the standard) Key action Person assigned responsibility to perform key action a contract or the issuing of an by more than 20% 6.8 PG8E Obtain approval to cancel or terminate a contract Approve amount Director or delegate 6.9 PG8F Obtain approval to amend a contract Approve proposed amendment to contract Director or delegate Table 3: Procurement activities and gates associated with the issuing of an order above the quotation threshold in terms of a framework agreement Activity Key action Person assigned responsibility to perform key action 1 FG1 Confirm justifiable reasons for selecting a framework contactor where there is more than one framework agreement covering the same scope of work Confirm reasons submitted for not requiring competition amongst framework contractors or instruct that quotations be invited Director or delegate 3 FG2 Obtain approval for procurement documents Grant approval for the issuing of the procurement documents Bid Specification Committee
Avoid delays: By taking onboard relevant information from consultees to tailor the assessment. relations with stakeholders: Stakeholder benefits include enhanced trust in the competence of EIA and thus the quality of IA. Practitioner benefits include improved quality of inputs into the assessment and development of contacts that could generate efficiency in future work. Speed up decision-making: By setting a marker for the content of the IA and potentially reducing the number of documents submitted alongside the application. Wilkinson (2007) adds that effective scoping can reduce the potential for disagreement between the regulator and proponent over the adequacy of an IA when it is submitted for consideration. This results in less requests for further information – a process that can be resource intensive and frustrating for all ACT Planning (n.d.) notes that IAs that are not well scoped can result in: extensive and unnecessary information collection with a decrease in efficiency and effectiveness a lack of identification of/or focus on key impacts slower assessment process increased Simply stated, scoping involves the bringing together of the ideas for the contents of the IA held by a variety of people in the community – the proponent, government, organisations and interested individuals for a particular development proposal, action or policy. Hogg (2006) suggests scoping is ‘one of the most fundamental skills required by general practitioners working in environmental planning and assessment, and should be applied, if only subconsciously, to every project’. What are the current issues with scoping? Good scoping must reflect the community’s interests while achieving efficiency and effectiveness in the IA process. Snell and Cowell (2006) argue that scoping practices can be seen as emerging from the interplay between the somewhat conflicting aims to give effect to the precautionary principle, but to make decision-making processes more efficient. Scoping has been identified as a common weakness in the IA processes of many countries (Abaza et al. 2004 in Barnes et al) and has been an issue within the Australian context for some time. Issues commonly identified by participants in the IA process include the following. Lack of on the things that matter While scoping is used to identify the matters that need to be assessed as part of the IA for a project, the biggest challenge is often deciding on the matters that do not require further assessment. Scoping out matters can be difficult for participants. Inexperienced practitioners may struggle in assigning significance to potential impacts. Matters may also be included that more reflect the personal interests of the practitioner preparing the government
Service Credits Service Credits apply with respect to any failure to meet this Service Level in accordance with clause 4. Consumable Delivery Description Metric Definition Delivery time for Consumables. Service Coverage Hours Business Hours Measurement Hours Business Hours Minimum Service Level Consumables ordered by the Agency are Delivered within two Business Days, unless agreed otherwise for Remote sites. 90% within two Business Days 95% within three Business Days 100% within four Business Days If Remote Management and/or a Valet Service is used - Consumables ordered by the Contractor are Delivered within two Business Days, unless agreed otherwise for Remote sites. 90% within two Business Days 95% within Business Days 100% within four Business Days Target Service Level Consumables ordered by the Agency are Delivered within two Business Days. 95% within two Business Days 100% within Business Days If Remote Management and/or a Valet Service is used - Consumables ordered by the Contractor will be Delivered within two Business Days. 95% within two Business Days 100% within three Business Days Measurement Methodology Measurement point From the time either the Helpdesk or website is notified by the Agency Representative or the Contractor Personnel requesting the provision of Consumables to the time of Delivery of the Consumables to the Agency site.
Priority Sites 90% within four Business Hours 100% within 10 Business Hours. Metropolitan sites 90% six Business Hours 100% within 15 Business Hours Regional sites 85% within 10 Business Hours 100% within 20 Business Hours Remote sites unless agreed otherwise by the Agency. 85% within 16 Business Hours 100% within 30 Business Hours Target Service Level Faulty MOMs Product(s) as identified by the Agency to the Contractor's Helpdesk is returned to full functionality within: Priority 95% within four Business Hours 100% within eight Business Hours Metropolitan sites 95% within six Business Hours 100% within 10 Business hours Regional 95% within 10 Business 100% within 16 Business Hours Remote sites 95% within 16 Business Hours 100% within 24 Business Hours Measurement Methodology Measurement point Time of Fault notification to the Contractor's Helpdesk; and the time at which full functionality of the MOMs Product is restored and fully operational (‘Returned to Service’). Full functionality and fully operational includes the MOMs Product operating in accordance with its Specifications, including those in the Statement of Minimum Requirement. Calculation For MOMs Product(s) which has been reported as faulty by the Agency, Return to Service is measured as: the time a Fault is logged with the Contractor's Helpdesk; and
receiving waters within and downstream of the proposal. management process outlined in the BPEM Guidelines. This should be documented in an acceptable SQMP containing commitments and information in accordance with the above guidelines to achieve the design objectives of Chapter 2. AND Probable Solution PS4.2 All drainage lines, diversion and collection drains and banks, chutes and outlets are able to safely carry peak flow at least in the 10 year ARI time of concentration storm event. AND Probable Solution PS4.3 Release of sediment laden stormwater is avoided for the nominated design storm and minimised when the design storm is exceeded. Compliance with these acceptable solutions can be demonstrated by providing conceptual detail of how stormwater quality will be managed (as part of a SQMP prepared by suitably qualified persons/professionals), including how the design objectives in Chapter 2 will be met (conceptual SQMP). This may be conditioned and may require the submission of a subsequent detailed site SQMP and/or ESCP for construction and operational works prepared by suitably qualified professionals (e.g. with tertiary qualifications in environmental engineering, as well as erosion and sediment control). Protection of Natural Flows Specific Outcome SO5 Stormwater management avoids or minimises impacts from quantity and flow rates in waterways. Probable Solution PS5.1 Development incorporates stormwater flow control measures to achieve design objectives set out in draft Urban Stormwater - Queensland Best Practice Environmental Management Guidelines as amended. Compliance with the flow design objective may be achieved by limiting the post-development peak discharge at the site boundary for the 1year Average Recurrence Interval (ARI) event to a permissible site discharge calculated using the Rational Method (or equivalent) with: 3 hour time of concentration; and Pre-development 1 year ARI runoff coefficient; zero pre-development imperviousness; and vegetation characteristic of the site over last three years. For sites that have been subject to vegetation clearing the pre-clearing vegetation characteristics should be assumed. Part B Development Requirements – point source waste water management (other than contaminated stormwater and sewage)
No person shall obstruct the transaction of business at a meeting or behave offensively or improperly. If, in the opinion of the Chairman, there has been a breach of standing order 10(a) above, the Chairman shall express that opinion and thereafter any Councillor (including the Chairman) may move that the person be silenced or excluded from the meeting, and the motion, if seconded, shall be put forthwith and without discussion. If a resolution made in accordance with standing 10(b) above, is disobeyed, the Chairman may take such further steps as may reasonably be necessary to enforce it and/or he may adjourn the meeting. 11. RESCISSION OF PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS A resolution (whether affirmative or negative) of the Council shall not be reversed within 6 months except either by a special motion, the written notice whereof bears the names of at least 5 Councillors of the Council, or by a motion moved in pursuance of the report or recommendation of a committee. When a special motion or any motion moved pursuant to standing order 11(a) above has been disposed of, no similar motion may be moved within a further 6 months. 12. VOTING ON APPOINTMENTS Where more than 2 persons have been nominated for a position to be filled by the Council and none of those persons has received an absolute majority of votes in their favour, the name of the person having the least number of votes shall be struck off the list and a fresh vote taken. This process shall continue
Where the licensing team consider the proposed site to be suitable, the application will proceed to the next stage. 5. Inspection of the Street Trading Unit The vehicle, van, trailer, stall or other device to be used for the proposed street trading activity will be inspected by an Authorised Officer of the council prior to the issue of any street trading consent, where this is reasonably practicable. The appearance of the unit will not present a loss or be detrimental to the of the area. At this stage the external colour decoration and appearance of the premises will be discussed and agreed. The unit to be used for the street trading activity shall comply with the legal requirements relating to the type of street trading activity proposed. In particular the unit to be used shall comply with food hygiene, health and safety and environmental protection legislation. 6. Criteria for determining an application You must be over 17 years of age to hold a consent. The council may refuse an application to on a consent street on any grounds they think fit. There are no specific grounds stipulated in the legislation, however the council will use the criteria listed below in the determination of street trading consents. All the criteria should normally be satisfied, and equal weight will be applied to the criteria listed. Each application will be assessed on its own merits and individual circumstances Public Safety The street trading activity (location and trading activity) should not present a substantial risk to the public in terms of road safety, obstruction and fire hazard. Prevention of street (public order) and anti-social behaviour. The street trading activity should not present a risk to good public order or be the cause of anti social behaviour in the locality in which it is situated. Public Health The street trading activity (or of goods sold) should not have a detrimental impact on public health, given the location of the trading site in terms of its proximity to a local school or college. Avoidance of Nuisance The street trading activity should not present a substantial risk of nuisance from noise, light, litter, smells or fumes to households and businesses in the vicinity of the trading site. Needs of the Area The street trading unit should not present a loss of amenity in terms of its appearance; The council will have regard to whether there is already adequate like provision in the immediate vicinity of the site to be used for street trading purposes; The council will have regard to the number, nature and type of traders already present in a particular area.
Ministry of Health, welfare and sport VERSTEEGH Ans Poland Chief Sanitary Inspectorate PARAFINSKA Katarzyna Portugal - Water and Waste Services Regulation Authority SIMAS Luis Romania Ministry of Health CÂRLAN Adriana Ministry of environment, Waters and Forests HARCEAG Andreea Slovak Republic Ministry of Health GUBKOVA Daša United Kingdom Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) MAY Annabelle Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) RINK Marcus Non-Member States Norway Norwegian Food Safety Authority NICHOLLS Morten Stakeholders STH Aqua Publica Europea FIASCONARO Milo milo.fiasconaro@aquapublica.eu STH CEEP - Centre of employers and entreprises providing public services CRAMER Wennemar STH ECPA-European Crop Protection Association SCHOONEJANS Thierry STH EPSU – European Federation of Public Service Unions DURIVAUX Guillaume STH EUREAU - European Federation of National Associations of Services CASTELL EXNER Claudia castell-exner@dvgw.de
STH European Copper Institute OCKENFELD Klaus STH Food & Water Europe SANCHEZ CARPIO David STH World Health Organisation SCHMOLL Oliver FAWELL John EU Commission / European Environment Agency - European Centre / Consultants ENV.C.2 European Commission, DG Environment, Unit C.2 "Marine Environment and Water Industry" DE Els BIERMANN Tobias FEDER Maja MAINZ Christof RAKEDJIAN LEROY Clémentine Excused: Bulgaria Not represented: Cyprus, Greece, Lithuania, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden
Only the professor of record can clear a course grade of “incomplete.” If you do not complete the missed work under my supervision within one year, then the “IN” grade will convert to an “F”—even if you decide to retake the course under another professor. For example, students who must make up oral presentations must make the presentations in one of my subsequent classes prior to the end of one year. Course Grade Determination (in order of due dates): Regular Graded Assignments (Blackboard grade book label) Max. Points Due Not Later Than Evaluation of Career Education (“Needs”) 50 Jun. 6 OWL Résumé Module Quiz (“OWL Résumé“) 50 Jun. 7** OWL Application/Approach [Cover] Letters Module Quiz (“OWL Letters“) 50 Jun. 8** Résumé (“Résumé“) 100 Jun. 11* OWL Emails Module Quiz (“OWL Email“) 50 Jun. 12** Midterm Examination (“Midterm“) 200 Jun. 13 OWL Business Writing Assignment [all four core modules] (“OWL Business“) 200 Jun. 18** OWL Presentation Module Quiz (“OWL Presentation“) 50 Jun. 21** Take-Home Writing Assignment (“Take Home“) 200 Jun. 22* Self-assessment Library (“Self-Assessment“) 100 Jun. 25* Oral Presentations (“Oral“) 200 Jun. 26-Jul. 5 Final Examination (“Final“) 250 July 10 Quizzes [total] (Quiz 1, Quiz 2, etc.) 500 Unannounced Total [excluding extra-credit points] 2000 Non-attendance at or late for guest lectures and oral presentations (Deduct) -25 ea. * Due in class at the end of class ** Due not later than 4:00 p.m. Course Letter Grade Points Total Course Points 4.00 1941 - 2000 A 4.00 1861 - 1940 3.67 1800 - 1860 3.33 1741 - 1799 B 3.00 1661 - 1740 2.67 1600 - 1660 2.33 1541 - 1599 C
Résumé (“Résumé”) 100 June 11 * Midterm Examination (”Midterm”) 200 June 13 OWL Core Modules [average of 4 core modules] (”OWL Core”) 100 June 18 ** MyBCommLab-based Writing Assignment Writing”) 200 June 23 ** Oral Presentation (”Oral”) 200 June 24 – July 3 Final Examination (”Final”) 200 July 8 *** Quizzes [total] (”Quiz 1,” ”Quiz 2,” etc.) 400 Unannounced Total [excluding extra-credit points] 1500 Absent or late for guest lectures and oral presentations (Deduction each time) -25 * Due by end of class ** Due not later than 11:59 p.m. *** Refer to class schedule for time for final exam Course Letter Grade Grade Points Total Course Points * 4.00 1450 - 1500 A 4.00 1400 - 1449 3.67 1350 - 1399 3.33 1300 - 1349 B 3.00 1250 - 1299 2.67 1200 - 1249 2.33 1150 - 1199 C 2.00 1100 - 1149 1.67 1050 - 1099 1.33 1000 - 1049 D 1.00 950 – 999 0.67 900 - 949 F 0.00 below 900 * Course grades based only on the number of whole points earned, with rounding up of whole points only if the final cumulative point decimal is 0.5 or more. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ)
Revision History Revision Date Editor Changes Made 0.1 November 14, 2011 Mary Ruddy, Identity Commons Initial draft version. Includes: General adaptations of Identity in the Cloud TC method example template. 0.11 December 8, 2011 Mary Identity Commons Adding method examples from F2F. One put into alternate template format. 0.12 December 12, 2011 Mary Ruddy, Identity Commons Method examples put in alternate template format. Additional examples. Edits. 0.13 December 14, 2011 Mary Ruddy, Identity Commons Feedback from other editors 0.14 December 27, 2011 Mary Identity Commons Feedback from other editors and additional examples 0.15 January 12, 2012 Mary Identity Commons More feedback from other editors and additional examples. 0.16 February 17, 2012 Mary Ruddy, Identity Commons Additional examples. New methods are marked in Red. Method examples are categorized as Core to TC objectives or Edge. Started to list threats that methods address. 0.2 March 12, 2012 Mary Ruddy, Identity Commons Additional methods. rewrite of some of existing methods. 0.23 March 29, 2012 Mary Ruddy, Identity Commons Added list of methods. Additional method examples. Heavy rewrite of some of existing examples. 1.0 4, 2012 Mary Ruddy, Identity Commons Additional editing. -
GP Lunchtime Dementia Workshop Programme Schedule GPs from all locations are welcome to attend 30th September 2015 1200hrs to 1430hrs Lakes, Westmill Farm, Ware, Herts, SG12 0ES Programme Co-ordinator: Dr Arun Jha, Consultant Old Age Psychiatrist, HPFT 12:00 – 12:30 Registration, Lunch & Networking 12:30 – 12:35 Welcome & Introduction by Dr Arun Jha 12:35 – 12:50 ICD-10 diagnostic criteria for Dementia and Alzheimer’s disease – Dr Lauren Huzzey 12:50 – 13:05 Normal cognition & Mild Cognitive Impairment (Disorder) – Dr Lauren Huzzey 13:05 – 13:10 Q & A about Diagnosis of Dementia – Dr Arun Jha 13:10 – 13:25 Why & how can GPs diagnose dementia themselves using GP COG – Dr Arun Jha 13:25 – 13:45 Changes in the EMDASS Care Pathway & One-stop Memory Clinic, including Q&A – Dr Arun Jha 13:45 – 14.00 Shared Care Pathway: Guidelines for GPs – Dr Prag Moodley 14:00 – 14:25 Q & A on Shared Care Pathway – Dr Prag Moodley & Dr Arun Jha 14:25 – 14:30 Feedback & Evaluation form - Brown There will be a small number of 3rd sector stands, highlighting the support they provide for people with dementia and their carers To book your place or for venue information, please contact Lorna Brown
PROJECTED COURSE SCHEDULE 3/31-6/6 Week I Introduction and Orientation to Course 3/31/14 Video: “The Danger of the Single Story” (TED Talks) Teaching and Learning: Online Discussion Read: “21st Century Schools” (REMINDER: Due by Friday) Week II 10:30-12:00 ORIENTATION AT GROUT ELEMENTARY OR KATERI PARK APARTMENTS 4/7/14 Due by end of day: Journal #1 (via D2L); Read “Capstone Handbook”; Complete profile for D2L including personal picture Teaching and Learning: Online Discussion Read: “Nice White Teacher Lady” (Ayers Introduction); “What Makes a Great Teacher?” (Online) Tutor Notes & Discussion Week III What Are Current Patterns of Immigration? What is the 4/14/14 Difference Between An Immigrant and a Refugee? Activities: Knowing and Sharing our own story Questions and Answers about Immigration; Information about Refugees Teaching and Learning: Online Discussion Read: “Building Community from City Kids, City Schools p. 60-73 Notes & Discussion NOTE: There is online reading to do in preparation for Monday’s class Week IV How Can Schools Support Immigrant Children? 4/21/14 Activities: Discussion of the academic potential of immigrant youth and how to build English fluency. Powerpoint: “ELL Proficiency Levels” READ in advance: “10 Things Mainstream Teachers Can Do Today” (Online); “25 Tips for Tutors” (Online) Teaching and Learning: Online Discussion Read: “Education and the New Workforce in a Global City” City Kids, City Schools, p. 273-286 Tutor Notes & Discussion Week V Starting Time: 10AM 4/28/14 Activities: Check-in with Community Partners READ: “Somali Report (Online) DUE: Precis: Somali Youth Report (Due on D2L by beginning of class) Teaching and Learning: Online Discussion READ: “Lessons from Teachers”: City Kids, City Schools, p.113-135 Tutor Notes & Discussion
Announcements and Reminders for TC/TG/TRG & MTG Chairs LONG 2017 Page 12 of 12 G. OTHER UPCOMING WORKSHOPS, CONFERENCES AND EVENTS 1. 2017 i. Building Simulation 2017 – Aug. 7 – Aug. 9, 2017 – San Francisco, CA USA – Contact: http://www.buildingsimulation2017.org/ ii. ISHPC2017 – Aug. 7 – Aug. 10, 2017 – Tokyo, JAPAN – Contact: http://biz.knt.co.jp/tour/2017/ISHPC2017/congress.html iii. ASHRAE Building Performance Analysis Conference – September 27-29, 2017 – Atlanta GA, USA – Contact: https://ashraem.confex.com/ashraem/bpa17/cfp.cgi iv. 2nd ASHRAE Developing Economies Conference – Nov. 10-11, 2017, Delhi
This is the overall publication schedule for the ASHRAE 2018 Winter Conference, Chicago. For specific details and questions regarding these dates, please contact the appropriate Track Chair. Wednesday, March 01, 2017 Conference Abstracts, Technical Papers and Paper Session Requests Due Monday, 27, 2017 Conference Abstract Accept/Reject Notifications Friday, June 02, 2017 Website Opens for Seminar, Forum, Debate, Panel and Workshop Proposals Friday, July 07, 2017 Final Conference Papers Submitted for Review (Includes Bio, Learning Objectives and Methods of Assessment); Request for Conference Paper Sessions Due Monday, July 24, 2017 Conference Paper accept/reject notifications Tuesday, August 01, 2017 Seminar, Forum, Workshop and Paper Proposals Due Monday, August 07, 2017 Revised Conference Papers/Final Technical Papers Due Monday, August 21, 2017 Conference and Technical Paper Final
for and on behalf of Director Centre of expertise on sexual abuse and Signed by [insert full name of director/authorised signatory] ................................. for and on behalf of [Director OR Authorised signatory] [insert name of B ]
DAY TIME ACTIVITY DRESS PLACE RESPONSIBLE MON 06 NOV 0800-0830 Welcome address Welcome by Danish PM Course Introduction – aim and purpose Presentation of Course staff Presentation of syndicates Daily/Class B NUK Building 8 Room 153 Danish PM, ADMIN 0830-0900 In-processing Administrative Briefing Hand out Computers etc. Course Critique requirements Daily/Class B B8-153 0900-0930 NATO/UN MP Family and Doctrine Overview Daily/Class B B8-153 0930-0945 Coffee break and Course photo 0945 - 1100 Staff and Student Introductions Daily/Class B B8-153 1100 - 1200 PM Planning and HQ Interface The role of the PM in a staff Daily/Class B B8-153 1200-1300 Lunch Gemakket 1300-1330 Student Introductions Daily/Class B B8-153 1330-1430 National MP presentations (10 min) National legal and C2 aspect Daily/Class B B8-153 OR Senior National Student 1430-1500 Coffee break Daily/Class B B8-153 CEDB 1500-1630 National MP presentations continues Daily/Class B B8-153 OR Senior National Student 1630-1700 1700-1800 Dinner Gemakket 1900- Ice Breaker First 30 min in syndicates Civilian or Daily/Class B MP Lounge All instructors to participate ADMIN DAY TIME ACTIVITY DRESS PLACE RESPONSIBLE TUE 0700-0800 Breakfast Gemakket
WED 08 NOV 0700-0800 Breakfast 0800-0930 Provost Marshal ARRC PM in an multiagency environment – The Olympics, London 2012 Daily/Class B B8-153 PM ARRC Col Nadine Parks 0930-0945 Coffee break Daily/Class B B8-153 0945- 1045 International Law Perspectives Daily/Class B B8-153 1045-1100 Daily/Class B B8-153 1100 - 1200 Lessons learned Presentation Daily/Class B B8-153 1200-1300 Lunch Gemakket 1300-1700 Syndicate Work – Legal Aspects Daily/Class B B8-153 1700-1800 Dinner 1900- MP Lounge open DAY TIME ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE THU 0700-0800 Breakfast
ICDLN 4th Annual Conference, Saturday, 8th December 2018 Venue: Emmaus Retreat Centre, Swords, Co. Dublin Ethics & Professionalism: Informed by Faith 08:30 – 09:00 Registration with Tea/Coffee Welcome & Introduction – Dr. Keith Holmes, President, ICDLN 09:00 Lecture 1: Dr. Aisling Bastible MB “Delivery of Medical Care to Women living in Disadvantaged Circumstances.” 10:00 Lecture 2: Dr. Bairbre Golden FCAI MBA “The Ethics of Conscientious Objection in Healthcare.” 11:00 Tea/Coffee 11:30 Lecture 3: Dr John Keenan, Bishop “Philosophy, Ethics and Clinical Practice.” 12:45 Celebration of the Eucharist 13:15 Lunch 14:15 Lecture 4: Mr. John Bruton, Former Taoiseach “Maintaining Medical Ethics in a changing environment.” 15:30 Lecture 5: Dr Ciaran Craven MB SC “Potential Impact of recent legislative changes on medical practice in Ireland.” 16:45 Closing Remarks 17:00 Close Further information and on-line registration: www.icdln.ie
White, P. S. and J. L. Walker. 1997. Approximating nature's variation: Selecting and using reference information in restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 5:338-349. Appendix 1. The number of of mitigation lands that are in each of the eight priority habitat types listed by mitigation unit for the five Tribes. Grassland steppe Conifer Mixed Conifer Riparian Riparian Shrub Wetland Meadow Emergent Wetland Tribe Totals Benewah 183 86 105 374 Goose Haven 87 25 348 14 474 Windy 119 4 6 2 131 Cougar 120 17 10 8 3 158 Hangman 445.7 750.1 1196 Trout 214 1.5 3 0.5 219 Sullivan 2 8 28 9 47 Hepton 2 6 77 1 86 Total Cd'A 0 0 532.7 665 781.1 101.5 575 29.5 2685 0% 0% 20% 25% 29% 4% 21% 1% 100% W. Kuehne 2010 594 1052 8 147 3811 H. Kuehne 1404 591 1604 200 116 3915 Berg Bros. 1774 3108 150 73 5105 Berg 20% 727 673 380 20 1800 Nespelem Bend 257 75 332 185 30 215 Friedlander 35 25 60 Sand 564 836 1400 1863 700 167 2730 Tumwater 3600 3059 150 6809 1488 2972 11 4471 Boot Mtn 5114 545 27 5686 Rattlesnake 486.7 8830 21.9 107.2 9446 Appendix 1. Continued Grassland steppe Conifer Mixed Conifer Riparian Riparian Shrub Wetland Meadow Emergent Wetland Tribe Totals Hinman 170 600 770
Agency 2368 20 2388 Near 75 5 80 129 129 Redthunder 1164 133 38.5 1335 Jacobson 914 132 342 69 1457 Total CCT 21796 13609 2422 12832 229.9 1050.7 0 0 42% 26% 5% 25% <1% 2% 0% 0% 100% Kalispel Flying Ranch 89 78 13 245 134 559 Trimble Creek 54.1 16.7 44.8 714.1 70.2 900 Tacoma 130.5 45.5 38.4 181.5 98 494 22 4 29 114 9 178 Sandpoint 417 21 4 61 88 591 Big Meadows 75 25 20 440 50 610 Sand Creek 72 3 5 80 Carney 15 390 27 432 1.6 161 5.9 169 Total KTOI 0 0 0 859.6 193.2 165.8 2306.6 487.1 4012 Cover Type as % of Total 0% 0% 0% 21% 5% 4% 58% 12% 100% Kootenai Trout Creek 75 16.3 95.2 186.5 36.7 14.5 47.6 98.8 KTI 0 0 0 111.7 16.3 14.5 95.2 47.6 285.3 Cover Type as % of Total 0% 0% 0% 39% 6% 5% 33% 17% 100% Appendix 1. Continued Grassland steppe Conifer Mixed Conifer Riparian Riparian Shrub Wetland Meadow Emergent Wetland Tribe Totals Castle 1-4 98.4 11.2 60.5 1032.8 59.8 11.9 1274.6 McCoy 1-3 23.3 3.1 653.1 13.2 692.7 East McCoy 131.5 89.9 360.9 1 42.2 625.5 West McCoy 145 410 654.8 162.6 1372.4 Turtle 1-8 857.7 49.4 907.1
GW WL Written comments on concept 3.1 WGGW (MS representatives) 15th November 2016 Watch List method testing and presentation 3.1 WL Group volunteers Spring meeting 2017 TVs Written comments on ToR 3.2 WGGW (MS representatives) 15th November 2016 WFD/GWD review Inform SCG of planned activity by WGGW 3.3 Co-Chairs SCG meeting of 27-28th October Trends Update to summary report to be presented at spring meeting 3.4 Trends group Spring meeting 2017 DWD/WFD Technical report and a special session in Autumn 2017 meeting 3.5 DWD Group volunteers Autumn meeting 2017 Quantitative issues Deadline for comments on JRC paper 28th October. Put forward comments on direct recharge within public consultation. 3.6 Quantitative group (Manuel Sapiano) By end 2017