Score ranges 100 90 80 70 60 <60 Understanding of the engagement Identification of key issues Shows a good understanding of all the key issues (consultation with community groups, need for novel design, need to blend with existing facilities, Government regulations; and car parking needs). Has addressed all of the key issues. Has addressed four of the key issues. Has addressed three of the key issues. Has addressed three of the key issues but not very well. Fails to address more than half of the key issues. Management of key issues Has demonstrated how all key issues will be managed. Has demonstrated how the key issues will be managed with good explanation. Has demonstrated how the key issues will be managed with limited explanation. an understanding of how key issues will be managed. Shows a limited understanding of how key issues will be managed. Shows no understanding of how key issues will be managed. Personnel Experience and qualifications of key personnel to perform services all personnel in all five required disciplines with demonstrated experience. Lists personnel in four required disciplines with demonstrated experience. Lists personnel in four required disciplines, with limited demonstrated experience. Lists personnel in three required disciplines with demonstrated experience. Lists personnel in three required disciplines, with limited demonstrated experience. Fails to list at least three of the personnel in required disciplines. Division of responsibility and Has fully demonstrated in detail that all key personnel will have Has demonstrated that the listed key personnel will have suitable Has demonstrated only sufficiently that the listed key personnel will have Does not very well demonstrate that listed key personnel will have Gives an indication that key personnel will have Has no idea about division of responsibility
authority of the key personnel suitable responsibilities and authorities. responsibilities and authorities. suitable responsibilities and authorities. suitable responsibilities and authorities. suitable responsibilities and authorities. and authority of the key personnel. Experience Very good record of more than three recent engagements over the last three years for similar services. Good record of more than recent engagements over the last three years for similar services. Good record of recent engagements with two to three over the last three years for similar services. Sufficient record of recent engagements with two to three the over the last three years for similar services. Good record of one engagement over last the three years for similar services. No engagement over the last three years for similar services.
the specified system with many examples of use. that specified, with many examples of use. specified system, but with limited examples of use. that specified, but with limited examples of use. specified, but does not provide examples of use. Management methodology Well documented and explained with demonstrated success managing subconsultants on recent engagements. Good documentation and explanation with demonstrated success managing subconsultants on past engagements. Limited documentation and explanation but demonstrated success managing subconsultants on past engagements. Good documentation and explanation with limited demonstration of success managing subconsultants on past engagements. Sufficient documentation and explanation with some demonstrated success managing subconsultants on past engagements. Limited documentation and explanation, and or no demonstrated success managing subconsultants on past engagements.