437 6 12 E Include prior chair in list For completeness and inclusiveness, add Xiaoming Peng's name as a Should read "Xiaoming Peng and Jiamin Chen, Chairs". Note that this is what we have done in the past when over the course of development of the document there have been multiple chairs, for example in 11mb and 11v Proposed resolution: Accepted. According to the usual practice, add Xiaoming Peng as a chair at P6L12 as follows: “The following were officers of Task aj: Xiaoming PENG and Jiamin CHEN, Chairs Haiming WANG, Vice-Chair Jiamin CHEN, Technical Editor Shiwen HE, Sub-Technical Editor” Technical comments: CID Clause Comment Proposed Change 404 9.4.2.1 41 42 T Table 9-76 shows number of Element ID Extension values as being assigned to P802.11aj. However, those do not seem to exist in the latest ANA database Were these properly assigned? If so, why is there no ANA database update showing that? Either get ANA to update the database with matching Element ID Extension assignment or replace all the values in P802.11aj Table 9-76 with "<ANA>" to indicate that these need to be assigned by ANA. Proposed resolution: Rejected Actually the values for the Element ID Extension in Table 9-76 were assigned by ANA authority after May meeting. The authority updated the ANA database in 11-11/0270r35 (URL: ). Anyway thanks the commenter for reminding.
CID Comment Proposed Change Remark 406 164 41 T The formula seems to have an error. According to the formula and the parameters in Annex E, the center frequencies of channel number 2,3,5,6,7, and 8 are calculated as 63.72, 65.88, 60.48, 61.56, 62.64, and 59.40 [GHz] respectively and they don't match with the figure in For 2.16 GHz band, DMG specification (i.e. 20.3.1 Channelization) can be referred. For 1.08 GHz band, suggest the following formula and parameters: Channel center frequency = Channel starting frequency + Channel spacing x (Channel number mod 32) where Channel starting frequency is 56.70 GHz, Channel spacing = 1080 MHz, and Channel numbers are {35,36,37,38} instead of {5,6,7,8} respectively. This re-numbering enables regular numbering, and also avoids conflict with 11ay channelization seen in SFD). 407 E.1 284 27 T The channel starting frequencies for operating class 10 and 11 may be incorrect. The channel starting frequencies and/or the formula in 25.3.1 (Channelization) should be corrected. As the same as CID 406 Proposed resolution: Accepted. Change the starting frequency from “59.4 GHz” to “56.16 GHz” and “59.4 GHz” to “56.70” for Operating class 10 and 11 respectively. Change the formula in clause 25.3.1 in 11aj is as follows: “Channel center frequency = Channel starting frequency + Channel spacing × (Channel number mod 324)”
Change Table E-5 in Annex E as follows: Operating classes in China Operating Global operating class (See Table E-4 Global operating classes) Channel starting frequency (GHz) Channel spacing (MHz) Channel set Channel center frequency index Behavior limits set 10 180 56.1659.4 2160 2,3 — — 11 56.7059.4 1080 35, 36, 37, 38 — — 12 42.66 540 — LicenseExemptBehavior 13 47.52 540 9,10 — LicenseExemptBehavior 14 42.93 1080 — LicenseExemptBehavior 15 47.79 1080 15 — LicenseExemptBehavior <16>~127 Reserved Reserved Reserved Reserved — Reserved ... ... ... ... ... ... ... CID Comment Proposed Change Remark 409 T To ensure coexistence, 11aj should the same BW mode and compatible preamble structure as 11ad when operating in bands where 11ad can also operate in. To ensure coexistence, 11aj should the same BW mode and compatible preamble structure as 11ad when operating in bands where 11ad can also operate in. Proposed resolution: Rejected.
411 T Insufficient comment resolution does not detail the changes to the draft, e.g. "REVISED. See details in corresponding submission." does not specify the corresponding document nor does it specify the changes made to the draft Provide a sufficient resolution for all comments of the previous ballot. A resolution has to allow a balloter to identify clearly the changes made to the draft in response to a specific comment. Proposed resolution: Revised. The document number of the submission that contains the resolution to a comment is shown in the column “Submission” in the LB217 comments database 11-16/0193r4. As noted in the comment, in order to make the resolution more clear and easy to learn the changes made to the draft, the comments database 11-16/0193r4 for LB217 is updated to 11-16/0193r5. Thanks the commenter’s reminder. CID Comment Proposed Change Remark 418 47 11 T CDMG MCS index range should be 0 to 23 because OFDM mode is removed from 11aj. Change "0-35" to "0-23". Fix the similar errors throughout the draft. Proposed resolution: Accepted. The OFDM mode is removed from 11aj, so the CDMG MCS index range needs to be changed from "0-35" to "0-23". CID Comment Proposed Change Remark