zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Teerthanker Mahaveer University Faculty Profile Name Dr. Navin Mittal Designation Professor Age/ Gender 64/ Male E-mail ID drnavinmittal@gmail.com Educational Qualification Degree Year College University BDS 1975 King George’s Dental College, Lucknow KGU, Lucknow MDS 1978 King George’s Dental College, Lucknow KGU, Lucknow Total Teaching Experience After MDS 18 years Total No of Publications 8
Furthermore, this single provision, it would be unreasonable to charge for solar PV production which uses precisely the same powerline for supplying energy into the grid. This would be interpreted as yet a third charge for exactly the same infrastructure. 3. Prosumers must be recognized as a new class of participants in the energy market In the draft strategy, consumers feature strongly (70 mentions). Energy businesses (producers) are not quite as prominent (18 mentions). Despite this difference, it is quite clear the draft strategy divides participants in the energy market into these two distinct groups. Solar PV and other small scale producers do not fit neatly into this duopoly. Nor, on closer examination, do energy businesses. For instance, hydro-electric power stations cannot operate without computerized and electrically controlled water-flow regulators; so they consume electricity. Thus, even traditional energy businesses are prosumers, albeit with differences of scale to domestic solar PV installations. When modelling the economics of energy production and distribution, there are considerable efficiencies in using the same infrastructure for gathering power from the grid and exporting power using the exact same equipment. These efficiencies should result in lower distribution and transmission costs for local Tasmanians. These lower costs should be shared with all participants in the energy market: consumers, energy businesses and prosumers.
Verified by:_____________________________ Date:___________________
CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION OF TAX ROLL Sections 197.131 and 197.122, Statutes To: Tax Collector, County, Florida Tax Roll ID #: Please make the corrections below to the Real Property Tangible Personal Property Tax Roll for 20 . Parcel ID O.R. book Page Name Tax roll description Address Refunds Values Initial Corrected Refund less than $2,500 Tax collector: determine refund Just value Assessed or classified value, school Refund $2,500 or more Tax collector: send to DOR for action (s. 197.182, F.S.) Assessed or classified value, non-school Homestead, regular Homestead, additional Material mistake of fact being corrected according to s. 197.122, F.S., within one year of approval of the tax roll according to s. 193.1142, F.S., on (enter date). Senior homestead, county Senior homestead, municipal Economic Exempt value, non-homestead, school Exempt value, non-homestead, non-school Penalty, TPP Correction Type Add to roll Delete from roll Other: Back assess Correct description Taxable school Correct name, address Taxable value, county Combine with or Double with Parcel ID Taxable value, municipal TOTAL TAX Exemption and Assessment Limitations Adjusted Value Homestead Widowed Land Square feet Disabled Blind Building Lot size Governmental Institutional Miscellaneous Acreage Disabled veteran Disabled veteran discount Curtilage change Number of lots Deployed military Veteran spouse Number of residential units Tangible personal property First responder spouse Save Our Homes change Other: Senior citizen homestead Tangible personal property Adjusted Use Veteran service connected Totally & permanently disabled Improvement Vacant 10% non-homestead limit Other: Commercial agricultural classification Disabled veteran confined to wheelchair Other: Surviving spouse of veteran who died on active duty Reasons for correction Add pages, if needed. (Field will expand online.) Senior citizen homestead – 25 year resident Parent, grandparent assessment reduction Signature, property appraiser or deputy Title Date Received by: Signature, tax collector or deputy Title Date
All Hemiplegic, paraplegic, wheelchair required for mobility, or legally Limited income DR-416, DR-416B, or letters from 2 FL physicians (For the legally one can be an optometrist.) Letter from DVA*, and DR-501A, household income 196.101 Veterans and First Responders Exemptions and Discount Disabled veteran discount, age 65 and older % of disability Combat-related disability Proof of age, DR-501DV Proof of disability, DVA*, or US government 196.082 Veteran, disabled 10% or more by misfortune or during wartime service Up to $5,000 Veteran or surviving spouse Proof of disability, DVA*, or US government 196.24 Veteran confined to wheelchair, service-connected, totally disabled All taxes Veteran or surviving spouse Proof of disability, DVA*, or US government 196.091 Service-connected, totally and permanently disabled veteran or surviving spouse All taxes Veteran or surviving spouse Proof of disability, DVA*, or US government 196.081 Surviving spouse of veteran who died while on active duty All taxes Surviving spouse Letter attesting to the veteran’s death while on active duty 196.081 First responder totally and permanently disabled in the line of duty or surviving spouse All Taxes First responder or surviving spouse Proof of Disability, employer certificate, physician’s certificate and SSA** (or additional physician certificate) 196.102 Surviving spouse of first responder who died in the line of duty All taxes Surviving spouse Letter attesting to the first responder’s death in the line of duty 196.081 *DVA is the US Department of Veterans Affairs or its predecessor. **SSA is the Social Security Administration.
Deputy Tax Collector’s Return (without making levy) This writ was received on , 20 and was executed in County, Florida, on , 20 by collecting from the sum of $ and $ costs, without making a levy. Signature, deputy tax collector Date County, Florida No. TAX COLLECTOR’S WARRANT County, Florida vs. Taxes $ Interest $ Penalties $ Advertising costs $ Collection $ Attorney’s fees $ Warrant fee $ if paid before levy $ of levy and sale $ Grand total $ Deputy Tax Collector’s Return (if levy and sale is made) This writ was received on , 20 and was executed in County, Florida, on , 20 by levying on property belonging to described as follows: After giving the required notice, the property was sold to the highest and best bidder, for $ . Amount of sale $ Less costs of levy and sale – $ (see bill attached) Net amount from sale $ Signature, deputy tax collector Date County, Florida Costs of Levy and Sale Making levy $ miles traveled at per mile $ Advertising sale $ Drayage and storage $ Herding and driving livestock $ Care of livestock $ Other expenses incurred $ Bill of sale $ Return of warrant $
Dracula Reading Guide – Chapter 25 (13 pages) Before Reading: is a legal term for a group of people combining their assets into a pool and then dividing them equally among the members. “The Orient Express” was a famous that went from Western Europe to Eastern Europe. “M.S.” is an abbreviation for “manuscript.” Questions: What does Mina ask the men to promise to do for her? How does the of vampire hunters arrange to travel to Eastern Europe and monitor Dracula’s arrival? On page 291, Mina says, “‘Something is shifting from me in some strange way, and I feel than I have been of late!’” Dr. Seward then says, “The three younger men looked happier at the moment as they seemed to realise the significance of her words; but Van Helsing and I, turning to each other, met each a grave and troubled glance.” Why are Val Helsing and Seward worried about Mina’s statement that she is feeling better?
Name of Teaching Staff: Dr. Tarun Kanti Jana. Designation: Professor & Dean Department: Mechanical Engineering Date of Joining the Institution: 09. 08. 2002 Qualification with Class Grade UG PG PHD B. E. (Mech) 1st M. Prod. E. 1st Not relevant Total Experience in years Teaching Industry Research 14 12 6 Papers Published National International 05 (Conference) 07 (Journal & Conference) PhD Guide? Give field & University Field University Nil PhDs/ Projects Guided PhDs: Projects at Masters Level 04 Books Published/IPRs/ Patents P. K. Nag, S. Pati, and T. K. Jana, “Engineering Mechanics”, McGraw Hill Education (India) Pvt. Ltd. ISBN - 13 9781259097461. P. K. Nag, S. Pati, and T. K. Jana, “Engineering Thermodynamics and Fluid Mechanics”, McGraw Hill Education () Pvt. Ltd. ISBN - 13 9781259004360 Books Reviewed Manufacturing Technology (Vol. I & II) by P.N.Rao – TMH Basic and Applied Thermodynamics by P.K.Nag - TMH Professional Memberships Member – Institution of Engineers Consultancy Activities Nil Awards/Recognition Received 1. Reviewer of journal “IEEE Transactions on Men, Machine, and Cybernetics”. 2016 2. Review of journal “International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management”, Taylor & Francis, 2016 3. Member “BOS – Mechanical Engineering”, MAKAUT,2017. Grants Fetched Nil
Very Good: The offer satisfies the selection criterion in all respects. The evaluator has complete certainty and without reservation, that the Service Provider will be able to meet the required standard at the highest level. The Service Provider’s claims are fully supported by the information provided. The supporting information is comprehensive and complete. 5 Good: The offer satisfies the selection criterion in all respects. The evaluator has no reason to believe that the Service Provider will not meet the required standard. The Service Provider’s claims are fully supported by the information provided. Supporting information is comprehensive and complete. 4 Satisfactory: The satisfies the selection criterion to an acceptable degree. There are some minor deficiencies and shortcomings in the scope and detail of the supporting information and the evaluator has some reservations regarding the complete satisfaction of the required standard. 3 Marginal: The offer has some short comings and does not fully satisfy the selection criterion. There are some deficiencies in the scope and detail of the supporting information and the evaluator has some reservations regarding the Service Provider’s ability to satisfy the required standard. 2 Poor: The offer barely satisfies, or does not satisfy, the selection criterion. There are major deficiencies in the scope and detail of the supporting information and the evaluator has significant reservations regarding the Service Provider’s ability to satisfy the required standard. 1 Not Compliant: The does not satisfy the selection criterion. There are major deficiencies in all aspects of the supporting information and the evaluator considers that the Service Provider has not satisfied the required standard. 0 ATTACHMENT H – RESPONDENT’S DECLARATION Respondent's Declaration an authorised officer of.................................................…............................……................[organisation]
govCMS supports more effective web channel delivery functions within Government, and enables agencies to redirect effort from non-core transactional activities, towards higher-value activities that are more aligned with core agency outcomes (Figure 1). govCMS enables the Australian Government to do this at a lower overall cost. Analysis of government websites govCMS classifies government websites according to the following patterns: Website pattern Definition (general) Pattern 1: Templated Relatively small number of pages, rarely updated content, no complex functionality, no integration of the website with back-end systems, no registration or login functionality Pattern 2: Content Rich Moderate to large number of content based pages, some complex and interactive functionality, above standard search and other features. May include registration/login functionality Pattern 3: Feature Rich Moderate to large number of content based pages, highly customized pages and content, extensive application-based functionality such as registration/login functionality, dynamically generated content, personalisation, powerful search functionality, two-way integration with backend systems Pattern 4: Resource Archives Small to large number of content pages, with some degree of advanced functionality, more than 20GB of files and assets, including documents, multimedia, images – can be “fixed” archives or site that grow rapidly over time as new content and resources are published Pattern 5: Distributed Content Publishing Sites providing content as an API, centrally managed and shared or deployed across multiple front-end sites – which may include traditional websites, javascript web apps, mobile apps, kiosks, call centres, shopfront information displays There is a clear skew towards larger numbers of smaller, less complex sites (pattern 1 websites). The pattern of complexity is starting to change over time with a growing emphasis on patterns 3, 4 and 5. Figure 2: Number and complexity of websites A feasibility outlined three demand projection scenarios for the first four years of the programme (to end of June 2019): Conservative - the low end of the projection range - 182 websites on-boarded. Intermediate - the mid-point of the of the projection range - 298 websites
Office of the Secretary, Departmental Office of Resource Management Duronne Walker, Ph.D. Departmental Selective Placement Program Manager Phone: (202) 366-5305 Office of the Secretary, Human Resources Operations (OST, M-16) Elizabeth Jenkins Human Resources Specialist Phone: (202) 366-3405 Federal Aviation Administration (FAA, AHP-200) Cesar Collantes Human Resource Specialist (202) 267-7015 Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Triantafell Human Resources Specialist (202) 366-1753 Federal Highway Administration Allen Resources Specialist Federal Motor Career Safety Administration (FMCSA) Lisa Horne Human Resources Specialist Phone: (202) 366-7515 Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) Shanina McRae Human Resources Specialist Phone: (202) 493-6114 Fedreal Transit Administration Shauna Mcdowell Human Resources Specialist Phone: (202) 366-2234 Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Kimberly Human Resources Specialist Phone: Maritime Administration (MARAD) Kennetha Marbury Human Resources Specialist Phone: (202) 366-0201 National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA) Terrance Webster Resources Specialist Phone: (202) 366-5544 Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) Charkeena Magruder Resources Specialist Phone: (202) 366-1131 Volpe Center Arthur Bakis Human Resources Specialist (617) 494-2450 Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation (SLSDC) Julie Barnes Human Resources Specialist Phone: (315) 764-3245 DOT Office of Inspector General (OIG) Joanne Pittman Human Resources Specialist joanne.m.pittman (202) 366-6239 Research and Innovative Technology Administration Linda Riggins Resources Liaison Phone: (202) 366-0277
Update: The Director or designee of the Wabanaki Vocational Rehabilitation has participated in numerous training activities with DBVI staff. Some of these included the SRC Annual Training and a transition workshop with all of BRS transition VR Counselors. b. A representative from the Wabanaki Vocational Rehabilitation will participate on DBVI’s State Rehabilitation Council (SRC) Update: The Director or the designee of the Wabanaki VR Program continues to actively participate on DBVI’s SRC. Objective: DBVI continues its efforts to cultivate a communication network for consumers who are deaf-blind or dual sensory impaired (hearing and vision) so that there are professional Interpreters and Support Service Providers (SSP) available in each of DBVI’s five state regions. Strategies: Secure funding for coordinated operation of the SSP program. Update: The Independence Without Fear advisory committee is exploring additional resources in collaboration with an Outreach Coordinator. This coordinator has begun to systematically address identification of persons who are deaf-blind or dual sensory impaired throughout the State of Maine. Goal 4: To provide increased activities for public outreach, education and awareness of existing services and resources for the community and consumers who are or have low vision. Objective: DBVI will work with providers to create a better awareness of the resources available to individuals who are blind or have low vision by providing at least three public education activities in each of the five DBVI Regions. Strategies: a. Maine DBVI staff will provide in-service trainings to other service providers within their region. Update: Staff attended Career Café to provide information about DBVI services to other career counselors. In April 2015, staff attended EPIC ME resource fair and the Piscataquis Career and Resource Fair at Foxcroft Academy to provide information about DBVI services and jobs to students, consumers, providers and adults.
MEETING OF HATFIELD TOWN COUNCIL Monday 12th September 2016 Held at the Council Offices, Cuckoo Lane, Hatfield Members Present D Fiennes-Gregory (Town Mayor) M K Knight D Anderson Mrs P Sanderson Mrs J Credland W Morrison J Brown Ms L Curran W Temperton-Ball Ms V Moate Ms A Rutherford R Powell Mrs M Curran Mrs C McRoy, Town Clerk Mrs S Fletcher, Assistant Town Clerk 41 ACCEPTANCE OF APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE None 42 MATTERS RAISED BY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC A group in excess of 18 members of the public attended in respect of one issue one spokesperson initially voiced their concerns. The residents predominantly from Doncaster Road, Hatfield were concerned about the proposed residential development to be carried out on open land opposite their dwellings. A recent planning application had been granted, and concerns were expressed in respect of added pressures on local services for example schools, doctors and the infrastructure in general resulting in a detrimental effect on the community as a whole. The residents felt that they had not been kept informed of the progress of the planning application; a leaflet distributed to residents was incorrect and felt the Town Council did not support the residents. The Chair advised the residents that Hatfield Town Council had submitted objections against the planning applications and subsequent appeals, however Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council have the responsibility to make the decisions on planning applications, and Hatfield Town Council do not have any authority on the final decision. The Town Clerk advised the residents the developers distributed the leaflet and the Town Council advised them information was incorrect. The Chair
A method described by Mols et al. [5], adapted by Baig et al. [6] and subsequently used by Jarral et al. [7] was used to assess the methodological quality of included studies. This method uses a standardised 10-item checklist (Figure 1). Studies scoring ≥8 were considered to be “high quality”, a score between 5-7 was “moderate quality”, and a score <5 considered “poor quality”. RESULTS Selected Studies Literature search identified 451 studies, of which 43 [8-50] were selected (Figure 2). Data from these studies is summarized in Tables 1-3 which is available as an online supplement. Study Objectives, Designs and Population The 43 studies included comprised a total of 6865 participants (range 9-803). Twenty-one were prospective cohort [9-16, 21, 22, 28, 29, 32, 35, 36, 40, 42, 44, 45, 48, 50], 6 were retrospective cohort [30, 34, 37, 38, 43, 46], 3 were randomised controlled trials [8, 18, 31], 3 were non-randomised controlled trials [19, 47, 49], 3 were cross-sectional [20, 25, 27], 3 were retrospective cross-sectional [24, 26, 33], 2 were post-approval studies [39, 41], 1 was prospective case-control [17], and 1 was prospective longitudinal [23]. All studies included patients who underwent intervention from 1976 to current. Twenty-six (60.5%) studies originated from Europe, 13 (30.2%) from USA, 4 (9.30%) from Canada, and 1 (2.33%) from Australia. 13 (30.2%) were multicentre studies. To ease reading and improve clarity of results, the above studies were categorised into 3 groups (see online supplement for Tables 1-3): 1. Studies including conventional MV interventions (surgical repair or replacement)
Safe Harbor OH rate FHWA considering it States need to request to be part of the test DOT sponsoring the test Part of TEO-45 Task Force Reports Peer Review Panel – Marlene Hartinger, OR (Handout) – see attachment Deadline- 6 months to put team together Established July deadline for requesting Peer Review for next year Vote passed to add two new panel members – Benita, TX, and Mike, TN Look for criteria to determine if they can staff Clean up survey questions Forms still from 2007 Yellow Book 5 Member panel – can use help with updates, etc Concerns of No CPE points for serving on panel Possible CPE credit for being on a Peer Review team Get requests in early Criteria for remote reviews Questionnaire updated State balances – get a negative to a positive status Professional Audit standard Report – David Green, OK Possible additional audit requirements may be coming
Additionally, on October 17, 2010 FHWA issued Order #4470.1A stating its policy for Contractor Certification of Costs in Accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation to establish Indirect Cost Rates on Engineering and Design-related Services Contracts. The Task Force feels this should be referenced in the Guide in Chapter and attached to the Guide as Appendix E-4. All the changes were voted on and approved by those 34 members present, unanimously. Vote passed to elect Forrest Cameron, GA, as Co-Chair of Audit Guide Panel Jeffery Owens, FL – tentative co-chair ACEC Liaison Committee Report – Carri Rosti, ID States handling Premium OT inconsistently nationally is still a concern Much interest in next revision of Audit Guide Consistent use of Audit Guide is encouraged Emphasize participation by consultants in compensation surveys is needed to sustain the NCM Public Private Partnership Guide report No work has been done Dave Bruce, FHWA, discussed a California Project using new methodology Need to solicit new members West Virginia getting sued for tolls on roads Dave Campbell Quality Award Report – Dan Kahnke, MN National Compensation Matrix (NCM) Development “Small Team” Forrest Cameron, Georgia DOT; Jana Cassidy, Ohio DOT; Mike Cram, Idaho DOT; Scot Gormley, Ohio DOT; Kent Leopold, Texas DOT; Dave Bruce, FHWA; Jim Barton, Simon
Number of Persons Involved 1 2-10 11-50 > 50 2. Travel To, From and During The Fieldwork 2.1 All Methods of Travel To, From and During The Fieldwork Activity Mode Type e.g. car, plane Commercial, Private or Other If Commercial, how selected? Who will be in control of vehicle? Driver holds appropriate license? How frequent will this mode of transport be used? Air Rail Road Other 2.2 Hazards and Risks Hazard/Risk Check If Applicable Detail The Precaution Taken Hazard Rating* (L/H/U) Navigation in remote areas Unsafe or insecure regions Off road or poor road conditions Poorly maintained vehicles or equipment Lone travel Other (specify) 3. Accommodation 3.1 List the accommodation used when travelling to or from the activity of during the activity Type Details When will this be used? What reliable information do you have on the suitability of the accommodation? Private Hotel/Motel Camping Other 3.2 Hazards and
Comments and/or inquiries regarding the Action Plan should be directed to: Prableen Mundi, Development Services Analyst, City of Yuba City, Development Services Department, 1201 Civic Center Blvd., Yuba City, CA 95993, phone: (530) 822-3233, e-mail: .
Table 2 – Agencies, groups, organizations who participated 1 YUBA CITY Type Other government - Local What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless Homeless Needs - Families with children Homelessness Needs - Veterans Special Needs Anti-poverty Strategy
Annual Goals and Objectives AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives - 91.420, 91.220(c)(3)&(e) Goals Summary Information Sort Goal Name Start Year End Year Category Geographic Area Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome Indicator 1 Homeless Assistance 2015 2019 Homeless Citywide Homeless Housing and Supportive Services CDBG: $48,000 Public service activities other than Low/Moderate Income Housing Benefit: 334 Persons Assisted 2 Housing Rehabilitation 2015 2019 Affordable Housing Citywide Preservation of existing units CDBG: $10,000 Homeowner Housing Rehabilitated: 50 Household Housing Unit 3 Infrastructure Improvements/ADA Modifications 2015 2019 Non-Housing Community Development Qualified Low/Mod Census Tracts Public Improvements and Infrastructure CDBG: $274,675 Public Facility or Infrastructure Activities other than Low/Moderate Income Housing Benefit: 5,160 Persons Assisted
12:15pm-1:30pm (Breakouts) Breakout 1 Intersections: See You at the Crossroads Roundabout & R-Cuts: Lessons Learned Jody Colvin/LA DOTD Flashing Yellow Arrows in Lafayette Warren Abadie Urban Intersection Improvements/PSAP Jennifer Breakout 2 Show Me The $$$ Adriane & Karla Courtade/LA DOTD Dr. Katara Williams/LHSC Breakout 3 Rail Safety – It’s More Than Rails & Vehicles Claude Maher/LA OL Private-Public Partnership: Moving Forward for Safety Bill Shrewsberry/Department of Transportation and Development Sooraz Patro Cypress I April Renard Cypress II Bill Shrewsberry Mississippi /Delta 1:35pm-2:35pm (Breakouts) Breakout 1 Integrating Safety into Planning RAPC Master Plan Sooraz Patro/RAPC Local Road Safety Plan Melanie Bordelon & Ashley Moran Atri Sen Breakout 2 Sudden Impact Bridget Gardner/ Breakout 3 Local Road Safety Steve Strength Melissa Newell Cypress I Kristy Miller Cypress II Jessica Deville Mississippi/Delta 2:35-2:50pm 2:50-3:25pm Autonomous Vehicles Kenyatta Robertson
(Plenary) Betsey Tramonte & John B./FHWA Premier II & III 3:25-3:40pm Closing Dan Magri/LA DOTD Premier II & III 3:50-4:50pm Ethics Chris Knotts/LA DOTD Premier II & III
ways, which may affect their survival. How do ecosystems change? Trade Book: How Mountains are Made Picture Book: Earth Then and Now ReadWorks text: Invaders of the Ecosystem Color picture set Data sets for different places collected over time (physical char., water distribution, temperature, resources) The environment may change in ways that affect a place’s physical characteristics, temperature and available resources. I can analyze and interpret data to describe how an ecosystem has changed. What do fossils tell us about life in the past? Examine fossils from KY Book: Fossils of KY guide Science Mystery – Whale in the desert Students make fossils or Chocolate chip excavation. Some kinds of plants and animals that once lived on Earth are no longer found anywhere. Fossils provide evidence about the types of organisms that lived long ago and also about the nature of their environments. I can analyze and interpret data about fossils to provide evidence of what environments were like long ago. How do organisms respond to changes in an ecosystem? Extinction research Endangered species research Migratory animals research When an ecosystem changes, some organisms survive and reproduce, some move to new locations, and some may die. I can construct an argument collected evidence that explains how organisms respond to changes in an ecosystem. I can describe the relationships between events and organisms’ responses using cause and effect text structure. (RI.3.3)
I can write an informative text that clearly describes how organisms respond to changes in an ecosystem. (W.3.2) How does part of a group help an organism survive? Books: ants, bees, herd animals, wolf packs… Group research projects Being part of a group may help animals obtain food, defend themselves, and cope with changes. Groups may serve different functions and vary greatly in size. I can construct an argument that some animals form groups to help members survive. I can report on how part of a group may help some animals survive using appropriate facts and relevant, descriptive detail. (SL.3.4) How can living things change an ecosystem? Nature walk Research Photos Easy to observe: moles, ants, plants, spiders Plants and animals can change their environment. I can gather information to provide evidence that plants and animals can change their environment. How do people change an ecosystem? Sustainability picture cards Brainpop Orange/green predator game Engineer in Elementary: Cleaning up an Oil Things that people do can affect the around them in helpful and harmful ways. I can gather information to provide evidence that humans can change ecosystem. I can compare solutions to a problem caused when the environment changes and and animal populations may also change.
ABSTINENT HEALTH & WELLNESS TIMETABLE DRAFT RED = REQUIRED ATTENDANCE BLUE = OPTIONAL ATTENDANCE PURPLE = OPTIONAL ATTENDANCE FOR SERVICE USERS WHO HAVE COMPLETED A CDARS ABSTINENT PROGRAMME MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY 10:30 – 12:00 BREATHALYSING & WEEKEND REVIEW 10:30-12:00 LIFESTYLE BALANCE & GOOD NUTRITION 10:00 – 11:00 SEEDS OF CHANGE 11:15 – 12:15 RECOVERY LIAISON & CURRENT CLIENTS MEETING 10:30 – 12:00 ART THERAPY (MALE) 10:30 – 12:00 FEMALE 10:30 – 12:00 PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP 11:00 – 12.00 YOGA GROUP 11:00-13:00 UNDERSTANDING 12 STEP RECOVERY 12:00 –1:00 LUNCH 12:00 – 1:00 LUNCH 12:15 – 1:00 LUNCH 12:00 – 1.00 LUNCH 12:00 – 1:00 LUNCH 1:00 – 2:00 LUNCH 1:00 – 2:30 RELAPSE PREVENTION 1:00 – 2:30 RECOVERY IN FOCUS & BLOCKS TO RECOVERY 1:00 – 2:30 DEVELOPING LIFE SKILLS & GOAL SETTING GROUP 1:00 – 2:30 ART THERAPY (FEMALE) 1:00 – 2:30 MALE GROUP 1:00 – 2:30 REVIEW OF THE WEEK 1:00 – 3:00 COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES BY APPOINTMENT 2.45 – 3:30 AURICULAR ACUPUNCTURE 2:45 – 4:00 RELAPSE PREVENTION BASED FOCUSSING 3:00 – 5:00 TEAM CLIENT MEETING SERVICE CLOSED 3:00 – 4:30 DEBTS & BENEFITS ADVICE 3:00 – 4:30 RASASC APPOINTMENTS (WOMEN ONLY) 18:00 – 20:00 GROWTH AND WELLBEING AFTERCARE GROUP 18:00 – 19:30 SMART RECOVERY AFTERCARE GROUP 18:00 – 19:30 EVENING ABSTINENT PROGRAMME (STAND-ALONE GROUP) (HELD AT BRIDGE LANE SURGERY)
20 October 2014 Venue: PensionsEurope Secretariat Koningsstraat 97 rue Royale 1000 Brussels Belgium Subject: Agenda Introduction Recent DB developments in the Member States – tour de Presentation new financial assessment framework in The Netherlands Consultation on solvency of IORPs and mapping exercise EIOPA Call for proposal ‘promotion of workplace pensions’ - Code of good practice Deliverables DB Standing Committee Future meetings
Working with MCOs Leveraging managed care to develop service innovations 2pm – 2:30pm Break 2:30pm – 4:00pm Topical breakouts and report backs with rotation every 20-25 minutes Table 1 – MLTSS – Merrill Friedman Table 2 – DOL OT rule – Mark Matulka Table 3 – Integrated health records – George Klauser Table 4 – New and innovative disability services 4:00pm – 6:00pm Open time 6:00pm – 8:00pm Group Dinner Friday, February 3 8:00am – 8:30am Continental Breakfast 8:30am – 8:45am Devotion – TBD 8:45am – 10:15am Workgroup meetings and report backs PAT Host Homes DSP Others? 10:15am – 10:30am Break 10:30am – 11:30am Member Sharing 11:30am – 11:40am LSA Update – Charlotte Haberaecker 11:40am – 12pm Shaping the agenda for April, August meeting location, February meeting date, etc. – facilitated by Nancy Rosemore
Staff: Aaron Jenkins, Economist Public Testimony Approval Exhibit D: COLUMBIA RIVER FISHERIES REFORM The Commission will be asked to adopt staff recommendations on Columbia River Fisheries Reform for 2017 and beyond. Staff: Ed Bowles, Fish Division Administrator Chris Kern, Deputy Fish Division Administrator Tucker Jones, Ocean Salmon and Columbia River Program Manager John North, Columbia River Fishery Manager Aaron Jenkins, Economist Public Testimony Rulemaking EXECUTIVE SESSION The Executive Session is held pursuant to ORS 192.660 (2)(e), (2)(f) and (2)(h), which allows the Commission to meet in executive session to conduct deliberations with persons designated by the governing body to negotiate real property transactions, to consider information or records that are exempt by law from public inspection, and to consult with legal counsel with respect to litigation filed against the Commission. BUSINESS ADJOURN FUTURE PROPOSED COMMISSION TOPICS * Written public comments for future Commission Topics can be submitted in writing prior to the meeting date at or mailed to 4034 Fairview Industrial Drive SE Salem, OR 97302 February 9, 2017 Portland Expo Center Reception at the Pacific Northwest Sportsman Show February 10, 2017 – Tigard *Written public comment period will open December 15, 2016 Access & Habitat Program Biennium Report – Informational Update Columbia River Treaty Fishery Rules – Rulemaking Director’s Performance Evaluation – Executive Session Resolution Supporting National Blue Ribbon Panel Funding Recommendations – Approval Columbia River Sturgeon Population Status Update - Informational March 17, 2017 – TBD
Provider Training Long Term Care Agenda (Subject to Change) September 26, 2017 – Moore-Norman Technology Center 13301 S. Pennsylvania, Oklahoma City, OK October 10, 2017 – OU Schusterman Center/Perkins Auditorium – 4502 E. 41st Street, Tulsa, OK 7:30 a.m. – 8:15 a.m. Registration 8:15 a.m. – 8:30 a.m. Welcome Mike Cook 8:30 a.m. – 9:30 a.m. Leading Through Change Dr. Paul Dyer 9:30 a.m. – 9:45 a.m. Break 9:45 a.m. – 11:45 a.m. Brain Changes: What is Lost - Dr. Beth Nolan What is Retained in Dementia 11:45 a.m. – 1:00 p.m. Lunch 1:00 p.m. – 2:00 p.m. The Validation Breakthrough: Communicating Naomi Feil/Paula Mixson with Cognitively Impaired Individuals 2:00 p.m. – 2:15 p.m. Break 2:15 p.m. – 3:00 p.m. The Validation Breakthrough: Communicating Naomi Feil/Paula Mixson with Cognitively Impaired Individuals 3:00 p.m. - 3:20 p.m. Oklahoma Department of Labor James Buck 3:20 p.m. – 4:30 p.m. OSDH Updates OSDH Staff
Draft Agenda Tuesday, October 30, 2018 8:00 – 8:30 am Continental Breakfast, Registration 8:30 – 9:45 am Welcome and Introductions: Name, Position, Program What keeps me awake at night What my autobiography be called? Large group 9:45- 11:15 am An Effective Program Presentation - Overview of 2 day training and materials Discussion of An Effective Program presentation Large group Jan, 11:15 – 11:30 am Break 11:30 – 12:30 pm Leadership and management presentation Large groups Jacqui 12:30 – 2:00 pm Lunch with colleagues 2:00 - 3:00 pm Leadership and management discussion What are key leadership and management issues new EDs are likely to have? Debrief questionnaire Small groups 3:00 – 3:15 pm Break 3:15 – 4:15 pm Changing Program Culture Leading Change, Kotter Characteristics of the Legal Aid Culture Staff Issues Large group Jacqui, Jan 4:15 – 4:30 pm Break 4:30 – 5:30 pm Changing Program Culture discussion Culture’s impact on achieving desired outcomes How managers impact program culture Ways to change culture that is not producing the results that ED expects Small groups 5:30 – 5:35 pm Introduce Effective Presentation role plays Small groups Wednesday, October 31, 2018 8:00 – 8:30 am Continental Breakfast Overnight thoughts group 8:30 – 8:40 am Move to small groups 8:40 – 10:00 am Effective Presentations: Role plays Small groups 10:00 – 10:15 am Break 10:15 – 11:00 am Money presentation Building a sustainable organization Working with financial staff Working with the board Large group
Importance of executive director’s direct involvement with fundraising 11:00 – 11:10 am Move to small groups 11:10 – 12:15 pm discussion Small groups 12:15 – 1:45 pm Lunch with Don Saunders, NLADA (30 minutes) or with a colleague 1:45 – 2:30 pm presentation What is an effective board? Importance of board training Results Patti Jan 2:30 – 3:30 pm Board discussion Common board issues Results discussion Large group 3:30 – 3:45 pm Break 3:45 – 4:45 pm Roundtable Small groups 4:45 – 4:50 pm Move to group 4:50 – 5:00 pm Large group wrap-up, Peer support, Feedback group
14:50-15:30 Short interventions (5-10’) of other experiences of AAA implementations, possible requirements and discussion Several speakers (TBC) 15:30-15:45 Coffee break 15:45-16:30 Set-up of the testbed for Authentication and Authorisation: introduction to a federated approach Andreas Matheus (Secure Dimensions) 16:30-17:00 Open discussion on the proposed set-up for the 17:00-17:30 Introduction to the breakout groups: presenting the challenges to be discussed, distributing the role/tasks within each group Danny Vandenbroucke (KU Leuven) 19:00-22:30 Dinner Tuesday 18 March 2014 09:30-10:30 2 breakout groups around two challenges of 10:30-11:00 Coffee 11:00-11:45 2 breakout groups around two challenges of 11:45-12:30 Short reports from the breakout groups and discussion Rapporteurs breakout groups 12:30-13:30 Lunch 13:30-14:30 Panelist discussing the challenges of a successful AAA implementation Dirk Frigne (chair, geosparc), Michael Lutz (JRC), Miguel Alvarez Rodriguez (DIGIT), Alice Vasilescu (Deloitte), Andreas von Dömming (GDI-DE), Chris Higgins (EDINA) 14:30-15:15 Presenting the planning for the testbed taking into account the discussions in the breakout groups Pieter De Graef and Andreas Matheus 15:15-15:30 Closing (with coffee) Danny Vandenbroucke, Danny
of money and often a lot of it. Science has also become internationally institutionalized by which I mean many studies; especially those involving physics, and genetics, involve many complementary disciplines, including an international caste of participants for which the list of authors and their affiliations will be obvious in some of the studies I’ve chosen to highlight in this series. The scope of the series In such a short series such as this it’s obviously impossible to cover Science – Science is far too broad for that. It would take a whole undergraduate course to cover Science in any meaningful way. And in any case, I’m hardly qualified to speak for Science as a whole. What I’ve chosen to do rather is to hone in on a few selected topics, which in my opinion stand out, either because they pose important issues for the public, now or if not just now, the near future. Those topics include gene editing, and artificial intelligence or AI, as it is more popularly known. Other topics include perennial favorites such as the story of how humans evolved and social intelligence in apes and humans. Yet others are interesting for their own sake such as using genomic data to track human migrations. In each case I intend to use at least one primary source to give participants a feel for how scientists go about their business. In the later choice, I’ve taken a page from my Oxford days when I served as an advisor for a unique undergraduate course in Physiology. Unlike most undergraduate courses in other universities, which tried to cover everything, this one focused on the hundred most influential papers of the last fifty years. So the students were in at the deep end right off but soon learned from the very best mentors, the authors of those original papers, what went into their work – the questions asked, the methods chosen to answer the questions and the analysis and critique of the results – topped off by replicating the original studies in the laboratory to give participants a real sense of the technological challenges faced by the original investigators and the limitations of their methods. Of course replicating studies was possible in only about a third of the studies. But by the end of the year the students had acquired an unrivaled grasp of the most influential key studies in neurophysiology – a much better experience than working through information gleaned from lectures, texts and reviews. It was an approach I tried to continue with postgraduate students throughout my
the Goods, Services or Goods and Services specified in the Statement of Requirements at Part 1; and all such incidental Goods and Services that are reasonably required to achieve the purposes of the Commonwealth as specified in the Statement of Requirements. Intellectual Property Rights means all intellectual property rights which may subsist in Australia or elsewhere, whether or not they are registered or capable of being registered. Material means any material brought into existence as part of or for the purposes of providing the Goods and/or Services and includes, without limitations, documents, equipment, information, reports or data stored by any means. Moral Rights means the rights of authors in relation to attribution and integrity of authorship or the right against false attribution. Record has the meaning given to the term in the Acts Interpretation Act 1901(Cth). Party means DFAT or the Contractor. Personnel means the Contractor and its officers, employees, subcontractors and agents (including Specified Personnel). Standard Contract Conditions means the provisions in Part 2 of the Contract. World Bank List or Relevant List means the list of organisations maintained by the World Bank in its “Listing of Ineligible Firms” or “Listings of Firms, Letters of Reprimand” posted at: http:web.worldbank.org or a similar list maintained by another donor of development funding.
2 Public Meeting Minorities Persons with disabilities community Residents of Public and Assisted Housing Ten non-profit agencies, staff from the Regional Housing Authority, a City resident, City staff and City Consultants attended the meeting. There was a discussion regarding the reallocation of the Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area (NRSA) funds as well as other unexpended CDBG funds from prior years. City staff directed those interested in these funds to submit a request for funding and description of their program/project for City's review and approval. No comments were received that were not accepted and incorporated into the 2016 Action Plan Amendment. www.yubacity.net
3 Public Hearing Minorities Persons with disabilities community Residents of Public and Assisted Housing To be completed at the end of the public comment period. To be completed at the end of the public comment period. No comments were received that were not accepted and incorporated into the 2016 Action Plan Amendment. www.yubacity.net 4 Newspaper Ad Minorities Persons with disabilities community Residents of Public and Assisted Housing To be completed at the end of the public comment period. To be completed at the end of the public comment period. No comments were received that were not accepted and incorporated into the 2016 Action Plan Amendment. Table 4 – Citizen Participation Outreach
Annual Goals and Objectives AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives - 91.420, 91.220(c)(3)&(e) Goals Summary Information Sort Goal Name Start Year End Year Category Geographic Area Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome Indicator 1 Homeless Assistance 2015 2019 Homeless Citywide Homeless Housing and Supportive Services CDBG: $87,045 Public Facility or Infrastructure Activities for Low/Moderate Income Housing Benefit: 1,058 Households Assisted 2 Housing Rehabilitation 2015 2019 Affordable Housing Citywide Preservation of existing units CDBG: $114,000 Homeowner Housing Rehabilitated: 138 Household Housing Unit 3 Infrastructure Improvements/ADA Modifications 2015 2019 Non-Housing Community Development Citywide Public Improvements and Infrastructure CDBG: $225,000 Public Facility or Infrastructure Activities other than Low/Moderate Income Housing Benefit: 5,160 Persons Assisted 4 Public Facilities Construction/Rehabilitation 2015 2019 Non-Housing Community Development Citywide Public Facilities CDBG: $30,000 Public Facility or Infrastructure Activities than Low/Moderate Income Housing Benefit: 860 Persons Assisted Other: 2 Table 6 – Goals Summary
Directorate (on behalf of ACT Government directorates) Whilst there are no specific comments on the draft, your observation relating to limiting the scale and extent of commercial and ancillary uses is supported. This should be set by the NCA in the context of development and lease conditions for development in the surrounding area. It is also noted that a suitable offset area will need to be found, and assessed under the EPBC Act, as necessary. of centres established for Canberra, however the proposed mix of uses will be considered as part of any future Works Approval processes. Please also refer to section 3.1 of the report. Leasing Block 3 Section 22 Barton (Block 3) is unleased National land, while Block 15 Section 22 Barton (Block 15) is Designated Land. Please note that one Crown lease cannot be granted over both blocks until such time as either the national land status is revoked on Block 3 or the status of Block 15 becomes national land. Noted. ActewAGL Icon The site is not currently serviced by sewer. There are existing sewer mains provided to the east and west of the site as follows; 600 mm sewer main located adjacent to the block to the west. There is an access hole located one third of the way along the block boundary and a site tie shown to Block 3. 150 mm sewer main located in the eastern verge of National circuit. Noted. Preparation of a Sewerage and Water Master Plan is a matter for a future proponent of development to address.
7) FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS AND FAIR HOUSING SURVEY FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS One element in obtaining community input into the development of the City of Albuquerque’s Five Year Consolidated Plan, a series of focus groups elicited information from representatives of key populations, identified by the City’s Department of Family and Community Services and its advisory bodies. The seven focus groups were: March 13, 2012 Los Griegos Multi-Service Center 1231 Candelaria NE (at 12th St.) Focus on: Seniors/Persons with Physical Disabilities 9:30-11:00 AM on: Persons with Behavioral Health Disabilities/Substance Abuse 1:00-2:30 PM March 14, 2012 PB&J Family Services 209 San Pablo SE on: Asian-Americans 9:30-11:00 AM Focus on: Immigrants 1:00-2:30 PM Cesar Chavez Community Center
5 Type of Acquisition (e.g. Negotiated, Sealed Bid): 6 Contract Type (e.g. fixed price, cost reimbursement, other): 7 Competitive (Y/N): 8 Date of Award: 9 Initial Contract Dollar Value (w/Options): Final Contract Dollar Value (w/Options): Period of Performance: Place(s) of Performance: Complexity of Work (e.g. difficult, routine): Type and extent of subcontracting (add rows if needed): ************************************************************************ PART 3: Customer Data Information 1 Customer Name & Title: 2 Customer Organization (including company and/or agency): 3 Role in Contract (e.g. CO, COTR, PM): 4 Address: 5 No.:
6 Fax No.: 7 Period of Evaluation: 8 E-mail: PART 4: RATINGS Please answer each of the following questions with a rating that is based on objective measurable performance indicators to the maximum extent possible. Assign each area a rating of either Outstanding, Satisfactory, Unsatisfactory, or N/A according to the definitions below. RATING QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE COST CONTROL TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE BUSINESS RELATIONS Outstanding There were no quality issues, and the quoter significantly exceeded the contract performance requirements without commensurate There were no cost management issues, and the quoter significantly exceeded the contract requirements, achieving cost There were no delays, and the quoter significantly bettered the agreed upon schedule. Responses to inquiries, technical/ service/ administrative issues significantly exceeded customer expectations.
additional costs to the customer. savings to the customer. Acceptable The quoter met the contract requirements. However, overall compliance required some assistance from the customer. The quoter met the contract requirements. However, customer provided some assistance to the quoter to manage The quoter met the agreed upon schedule. However, customer provided some assistance to ensure the quoter met the agreed upon schedule. Responses to inquiries, technical/ service/ administrative issues met the contract requirements. Unsatisfactory Non-conformances compromised the achievement of contract requirements. Quoter was unable to manage costs effectively. Quoter delays jeopardized achievement of contract objectives. Responses to inquiries, technical/ service/ administrative issues were not timely or effective. Please objectively assess the requesting firm in each performance element below by assigning an “X” to the most appropriate rating: QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE: Compliance with contract requirements, terms and conditions: Rating Outstanding Acceptable Unsatisfactory N/A Check (X) COMMENTS: