Marzano’s six process to teaching vocabulary in text October-November Team meeting discussions, teacher presentations of student work, reflection and surveys. Max Thompson Conference November Presentations from team Team meetings with specific focus CELLA GOAL Anticipated Barrier Strategy 2012 Current Percent of Students Proficient in Listening/ Speaking: 1. Language 2. Certified Staff Utilize effective vocabulary instruction. Implement grade level Walk to Intervention. Teachers/ ELL Committee/Administration 2012 Current Percent of Students Proficient in Reading: 1. Language 2. Certified Staff Utilize effective vocabulary instruction. Implement grade level Walk to Intervention. Teachers/ ELL Committee/Administration 2012 Current Percent of Students Proficient in Writing: 1. Language 2. Certified Staff Teachers/ ELL Committee/Administration Mathematics Goal(s): 1. 2012 Current Level of Performance (Enter percentage information and the number of students that percentage reflects) 2013 Expected Level of Performance (Enter percentage information and the number of students that percentage reflects) Anticipated Barrier(s): 1. Strategy(s): 1. FCAT 2.0 Students scoring at Achievement Level 3 Barrier(s): Strategy(s): 1. 31% 89 students 34% 113 students Florida Alternate Assessment: Students scoring at levels 4, 5, and 6 in Mathematics Barrier(s): Strategy(s): 1. 75% 3 students 100% 3 students FCAT 2.0 Students scoring at or Achievement Levels 4 and 5 in Mathematics Barrier(s): Strategy(s): 1. 41% 121 students 44% 136 students Florida Alternate Assessment: Students scoring at or above Level 7 in Mathematics Barrier(s): Strategy(s): 1. 25% 1 student 100% 3 students Florida Alternate Assessment: Percentage of students making learning in Mathematics Barrier(s): Strategy(s): 1. 50% 1 student 100% 3 students
FCAT 2.0 Percentage of students in lowest 25% making learning in Mathematics Barrier(s): Strategy(s): 1. 78% 55 students 80% 67 students Florida Alternate Assessment: Percentage of students in Lowest 25% making learning gains in Mathematics Barrier(s): Strategy(s): 1. 50% 1 student 100% 3 students Ambitious but Achievable Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). In six school will reduce their Achievement Gap by 50%: Baseline Data 2010-11: 74% 77% Student subgroups by ethnicity : White: Black: Hispanic: Asian: American Indian: 76% 50% 64% 79% 55% 73% English Language Learners (ELL) not making satisfactory progress in Mathematics Students with Disabilities (SWD) not making satisfactory progress in Mathematics 49% 54% Economically Disadvantaged Students not making satisfactory progress in Mathematics 71% 69% Mathematics Professional Development PD Content/Topic/Focus Target Dates/Schedule Strategy(s) for follow-up/monitoring Writing Students will write across the curriculum to increase student achievement. 2012 Current of Performance (Enter percentage information and the number of students that percentage reflects) 2013 Expected Level of Performance (Enter percentage information and the number of students that percentage reflects) Barrier(s): Conventions Vocabulary Expectation of Students Strategy(s): Utilize district resources for sentence imitation Vocabulary in text instruction Close reading and responding to text School-wide writing plan outlining expectations FCAT: Students scoring at Achievement level 3.0 and higher in writing 68% 49 students 70% 62 students Florida Alternate Assessment: Students scoring at 4 or higher in writing 100% 1 student N/A