Indicator 1.1.1 Note: Tracks the number of new jobs created and number of additional people benefiting from strengthened livelihoods from January 2014 onward. For complementary new jobs and livelihoods, please see indicator 1.3.2 and indicator 6.1.1. 1.1.2 Number of countries with policies, systems and/or institutional measures in place at the national and sub-national levels to generate and strengthen employment and livelihoods. Not adequately Very partially Partially Largely 74 linked countries with data reported 31 33 9 1 74 linked countries with data reported 14 34 23 3 74 linked countries with data reported 7 14 33 20 Indicator 1.1.2 Note: Tracks the number of countries UNDP support (on demand from programme countries) has led to a change in policies, systems and institutional measures with the aim of generating and strengthening employment and livelihoods. The effectiveness of UNDP’s support is tracked using a qualitative assessment and objective evidence of UNDP support having led to results. 1.1.3 Number of new schemes which expand and diversify the productive base based on the use of sustainable production technologies 68 linked countries with data reported 0 68 linked countries with data reported 404 68 linked countries with data reported 1,902 Indicator 1.1.3 Note: Tracks the number of new schemes (specified as demonstration projects, advocacy and knowledge generation, skills-building schemes, and implementation support) that played a catalytic role in prompting a follow-up action and/or leading to a major, transformational change, from January 2014 onward. 1.1.4 Number of countries in which public and private development investments are informed by cross-sector assessment to maximize social, environmental and economic benefits over the medium to long term Public investments Not adequately Very partially Partially Largely Government decision-making on major private sector investments Not adequately Very partially Partially Largely 1.35 linked countries with data reported 9 14 1 1 2.38 linked countries with data reported 23 12 2 1 1.35 linked countries with data reported 16 17 0 2 2. 38 linked countries with data reported 18 11 7 2 1.35 linked countries with data reported 4 8 19 4 2.38 linked countries with data reported 4 10 16 8
Results statement: No. Indicator Baseline Milestones (2014) Target (2017) 1.1 Programme effectiveness enhanced for achieving results at all levels through quality criteria and quality assurance processes 1. Percentage of country programme outcomes that are reported as either on-track or achieved (cross checked with evaluation findings) 50% (2013) At least 5% increase At least 10% increase 2. Percentage of partners perceiving UNDP as an effective contributor in identified areas MDGs: 58% Poverty eradication: 44% Democratic governance: 56% Crisis prevention and recovery: 45% Environment and Sustainable Development: 56% 65% for each outcome 70% for each outcome 3. Percentage of project outputs which are reported as achieved or on track TBD TBD TBD 4. Percentage of Country Office annual results reports which meet or exceed expected organizational quality standards (QCPR related indicator) 67% (2012) 70% 90% 5. Percentage of projects meeting or exceeding organizational quality standards (QCPR related indicator) TBD TBD TBD 6. Percentage of new country programme documents that meet organizational standards in the first submission for internal appraisal (QCPR related indicator) 73% (first quarter 2014) TBD TBD 7 Percentage of UNDP staff surveyed who report satisfaction with: UNDP policy services UNDP programme/project guidelines and support TBD TBD TBD 1.2 UNDP’s key development approaches fully integrated into UNDP programmes and projects for more durable results 8. Percentage of projects by type that meet quality standards for capacity development (QCPR related indicator) (2013) 50% of on-going projects recorded in the capacity tracker: - 88% had at least 1 of the 4 envisaged capacity development components - 36% had all 4 components TBD TBD 9. Percentage of expenditures with a significant gender component and with gender as a principal objective. (QCPR related indicator) Number of country offices that and report on expenditures using gender markers validated by a quality assurance process. [COMMON QCPR INDICATOR] (2013) 30% (4% gender projects and 26% projects with a significant gender component) 40% (8% gender projects and 32% projects with a significant gender component) 57% (15% gender projects and 42% projects with a significant gender component) 34 country offices (2013 – 2014) 70
2014-2015 $6,253 (13.0 % increase from 2012-2013) (4.0 % increase from 2014-2015) Other Resources (Non-government) 2012 $1,536 2013 $1,258 (8.4 % decrease from 2012) Resources (Government Cost Sharing) 2012 $920 2013 $1,139 (23.8 % increase from 2012) Other Resources (Government Cost Sharing) 2014-2015 $1,500 (27.1 % decrease from 2012-2013) Other Resources (Government Cost Sharing) 2016-2017 $1,500 (0 per cent increase from 37. Percentage of partners perceiving UNDP as a valued partner to their organization 87% (2012) 90% 90% 38. Percentage of Member States giving positive feedback on the quality of corporate reporting on results and mandates [COMMON QCPR INDICATOR] TBD TBD TBD 39. Percentage of country offices and headquarters units that are compliant with the internal standards for the international aid and transparency initiative (IATI) and Information Disclosure Policy 52% (2014) 80% 100% [cost classification: management functional clusters] 8. STAFF AND PREMISES SECURITY Results statement: No Indicator Baseline Milestones (2014) Target 2017 8.1 UNDP Country Offices are more resilient due to business continuity systems and security arrangements 40. Percentage of Country Offices meeting minimum operations security standards (MOSS) 77.7% (2013) 82.5% 90% 41. Percentage of Country Offices and headquarters units meeting Business Continuity Plan requirements 24% (2013) 65% 95% 42. UNDP Carbon Footprint (CO2 emissions) 85,142 tonnes (2013) 80,000 tonnes 75,000 tonnes CO2-equivalent Coordination of the UN Development System [cost classification: coordination] 9. UN DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM LEADERSHIP AND COORDINATION [cost classification: coordination]