In order to establish TXOP for transmission of only SISO PPDUs with an EDMG STA, an EDMG STA shall transmit RTS frame with TXVECTOR parameter CH BANDWIDTH set according to rules specified in 10.22.2.12. CID Clause Page Comment Proposed change "the transmitting EDMG STA set the TXVECTOR parameter SCRAMBLER_ INIT_SETTING to Channel_BW." This is ambiguous. Specify how this is done or provide a reference. Revised: Definition of SCRAMBLER_ INIT_SETTING was changed to indicate the available options 1641 10.3.2.7 The wording is confusing, does the CTS can have different bandwidth or not? I guess, dynamic bandwidth is allowed? Please clarify 1641 D1.0 Text If an RTS is transmitted in a non-EDMG duplicate PPDU to establish a TXOP for transmission of only SISO PPDUs (CH_BANDWIDTH_IN_NON_EDMG equal to one of CBW216, CBW432, CBW638, CBW864, or CBW216+216), the transmitting EDMG STA shall set the TXVECTOR parameter SCRAMBLER_ INIT_SETTING to Channel_BW. Revised with If the number of bits set in CH_BANDWIDTH is greater than 1: The RTS frame shall be sent in non-EDMG duplicate PPDU format. The TXVECTOR parameter SCRAMBLER_INIT_SETTING shall be set to Channel_BW. CH_BANDWIDTH SIGNALING value shall be set to the encoded value of the set of channels indicated by the CH_BANDWIDTH parameter as defined in Table 30. CID Clause Page Comment Proposed change 1957 10.3.2.7 CH_BANDWIDTH parameter in RXVECTOR may not indicate actual channel the RTS is sent. It should be instead Replace CH_BANDWIDTH by Revised D1.0 Text DMG
CID Clause Page Comment Proposed change 2251 10.3.2.7 A STA shall not respond DMG DTS to RTS with SU/MU MIMO field set to 1 in CT. This interferes with simultaneous CTS from other STAs in the same group add such requirement Revised: restriction was inserted: Revised Text In order to establish TXOP for transmission of only SISO PPDUs with an EDMG STA, an EDMG STA shall transmit RTS frame with TXVECTOR parameter CH BANDWIDTH set according to rules specified in 10.22.2.12. An EDMG STA transmitting an RTS frame to establish TXOP for the transmission of at least one MIMO PPDU or SISO PPDU with Hybrid BF follows the procedure defined in 10.36.11.4 CID Clause Page Comment Proposed change 2253 10.3.2.14 Not clear why cannot be set to Control_trailer add 'or Control_trailer' Rejected: Auther intention is that SISO TXOP shall not be used with Control Trailer and only with Channel_BW. CID Clause Page Comment Proposed change 2254 10.3.2.7 How can header-A and CT both present? clarify the requirement Revised: Requirement was removed. To provide complete bandwidth signaling information, the EDMG STA should include a control trailer in the transmitted RTS frame using the procedure specified in 10.36.11.5. An EDMG STA that receives an RTS frame containing a control trailer and that also contains bandwidth signaling in the PHY header shall use the bandwidth signaling contained in the control trailer and ignore the one in the PHY header. CID Clause Page Comment Proposed change 1568 10.3.2.14 please add 4.32+4.32 GHz case add CBW432+432 Revised: Definition was changed and doesn’t require the modification 1573 10.3.2.7 please add 4.32+4.32 GHz case add CBW432+432 Revised: