802.11 WLAN user experience" which, per the WG definition, means using the 802.11 MAC. This also seems like the wrong place to make this statement as the subcluse is "general" and not limited to control frames. general MAC frame structure of IEEE 802.11 base base specification. 8432 "10.48 Dynamic AID assignment operation": this subclause specifies general MAC functionality, not just MLME features, so it does not belong in the MLME clause. Move "10.48 Dynamic AID assignment operation" to a location between 9.20 and 9.21 (so this subclause becomes the new 9.21). Also rename it to "S1G dynamic AID assignment". Rejected- 10.48 (Dynamic AID assignment operation) is describing the AID update procedure. Its reference section is 10.3.5 (Association, reassociation, and disassociation) in IEEE 802.11 base specification. The BRC can not identify which operation is considered as the MAC functionality. So, the comment fails to identify a specific issue to be addressed. It fails to identify changes in sufficient detail so that the specific wording of the changes that will satisfy the commenter can be determined. 8436 "10.49 System information update procedure": this subclause specifies MAC function operation, not just MLME features. But this operation is part of the S1G operation, so make it a subclause of the "S1G BSS operation" clause. After moving the "S1G BSS operation" subclause from 10.50 to the new 9.42, make the current 10.49 subclause the new 9.42.2. Move subclause "10.49 Channel selection methods for an S1G BSS" to a location between S1G BSS functionality"(the new 9.42.1) and "Channel selection methods" (the new 9.42.3). Also rename this subclause "S1G BSS channel selection methods". Rejected- 10.49 (System information update procedure) is describing the system information update mechanism. Its reference section is 10.2.2.17 (TIM Broadcast) in IEEE 802.11 base specification. The BRC can not identify which operation is considered as the MAC functionality. So, the comment fails to identify a specific issue to be addressed.
It fails to identify changes in sufficient detail so that the specific wording of the changes that will satisfy the commenter can be determined. 8437 "10.50 S1G BSS operation": this subclause specifies basic MAC functionality, not just MLME features, so it does not belong in the MLME clause. Move the full subclause "10.50 S1G BSS operation", except for 10.50.7, to a new subclause 9.42. Rejected- 10.50 (S1G BSS operation) is describing the BSS operation. Its reference section is 10.40 (VHT BSS operation) and 10.43 TVHT BSS functionality) in IEEE 802.11 base specification. The BRC can not identify which operation is considered as the MAC functionality. So, the comment fails to identify a specific issue to be addressed. It fails to identify changes in sufficient detail so that the specific wording of the changes that will satisfy the commenter can be determined. 8440 "S1G BSS type and STA type": what is such a specification of a general operation doing buried at the end of the MLME clause? This material does not belong in the MLME clause. Move subclause 10.50.7 to a location between 9.2.5 and 9.2.6 (so it becomes the new 9.2.6). Rejected- The BRC can not identify operation is considered as the MAC functionality. So, the comment fails to identify a specific issue to be addressed. It fails to identify changes in sufficient detail so that the specific wording of the changes that will satisfy the commenter can be determined. 8442 "Support for energy limited STAs": this subclause is a specification of functional operations, not just MLME components. Move it into the MAC functional specification. After the TG creates the new subclause 9.42 on S1G operations, rename this subclause "9.42.9 Support for energy limited STAs". Rejected- The BRC can not identify operation is considered as the MAC functionality. So, the comment fails to identify a specific issue to be addressed.