This section of the report provides a summary of the status of the performance indicators based on data collected as part of the 2011-12 APR and discusses how performance relative to these indicators has varied across the past reporting periods. Table 8. 21st CCLC GPRA Performance Indicators GPRA Performance Indicators Measure 1.1 of 14: The percentage of elementary 21st Century regular program participants whose mathematics grades improved from fall to spring. Measure 1.2 of 14: The percentage of middle and high school 21st Century regular program participants whose mathematics grades improved from fall to spring. Measure 1.3 of 14: The percentage of all 21st Century regular program participants whose mathematics grades improved from fall to spring. Measure 1.4 of 14: The percentage of elementary 21st Century regular program participants whose English grades improved from fall to spring. Measure 1.5 of 14: The percentage of middle and high school 21st Century regular program participants whose English grades improved from fall to spring. Measure 1.6 of 14: The percentage of all 21st Century regular program participants whose English grades improved from fall to spring. Measure 1.7 of 14: The percentage of elementary 21st Century regular program participants who improve from not proficient to proficient or above in reading on state assessments. Measure 1.8 of 14: The percentage of middle and high school 21st Century regular program participants who improve from not proficient to proficient or above in mathematics on state assessments. Measure 1.9 of 14: The percentage of elementary 21st Century regular program participants with teacher-reported improvement in homework completion and class participation. Measure 1.10 of 14: The percentage of middle and high school 21st Century program participants with teacher-reported improvement in homework completion and class participation. Measure 1.11 of 14: The percentage of all 21st Century regular program participants with teacher-reported improvement in homework completion and class participation. Measure 1.12 of 14: The percentage of elementary 21st Century participants with improvement in student behavior Measure 1.13 of 14: The percentage of middle and high school 21st Century participants with teacher-reported improvement in student behavior. Measure 1.14 of 14: The percentage of all 21st Century participants with teacher-reported improvement in student behavior. Measure 2.1 of 2: The percentage of 21st Century Centers reporting emphasis in at least one core academic area. reported
Improved Student Behavior 68 67 67 69 72 71 68 67 By Attendance Gradation % Increase 2011-12 % Increase 2010-11 % Increase 2009-10 % Increase 2008-09 % Increase 2007-08 % Increase 2006-07 % Increase 2005-06 % Increase 2004-05 Improved HW Comp. and Class Partic. 69 68 68 69 71 72 71 N/A Improved HW Comp. and Class Partic. 71 71 70 71 72 73 74 N/A Improved HW Comp. and Class Partic. (90+) 72 71 70 72 73 73 76 N/A Improved Student Behavior (30–59) 64 63 62 64 66 67 66 N/A Improved Student Behavior (60–89) 65 65 65 65 66 67 69 N/A Improved Student Behavior (90+) 66 66 65 67 68 69 72 N/A *2003-2004 data were not included in the table. 11. Number and Percent of Students Maintaining Highest Grade Year Highest Grade as % of All Grades Reported: Math Highest Grade as % of All Grades Reported: Reading Highest Grade N: Math Highest Grade N: Reading 2007 5.96% 5.76% 20,214 19,662 2008 6.06% 6.13% 19,962 20,088 2009 8.06% 8.42% 24,216 25,324 2010 8.38% 8.51% 28,757 29,248 2011 8.97% 8.78% 32,481 31,679 2012 9.43% 9.52% 34,596 34,895 Summary and Conclusions The goal of this report is to report on the GPRA measures and to provide data on the overall efficacy of the program. PPICS data offer information on the operation of the projects funded by 21st CCLC, which has proven useful in providing descriptive profiles of active 21st CCLC grantees.: While incremental academic progress is being made by participating students, the program as a whole continues to fail to meet the established targeted performance thresholds associated with the GPRA performance indicators for the program..