zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
CKPU Staff Strengths Alex Espinoza Arranger Relator Achiever Self-Assurance Analytical Amy Harrington Learner Activator Achiever Positivity Strategic Dan Ryan Maximizer Arranger Input Learner Achiever Dunlap Responsibility Relator Discipline Maximizer Adaptability Janet Coffman Strategic Input Context Connectedness Learner Jeff McDonald Includer Empathy Harmony Woo Positivity Jessica Butz Learner Individualization Positivity Arranger Strategic John Kolodny Restorative Arranger Harmony Relator Responsibility Joshua Rutkoff Input Arranger Strategic Futuristic Learner Kate Pingo Arranger Achiever Belief Harmony Responsibility LeAnda Russell Activator Adaptability Strategic
Relator Intellection Maggie Robbins Intellection Achiever Analytical Relator Learner Marcia Marchelli Strategic Input Maximizer Adaptability Achiever Russell Wise Positivity Adaptability Connectedness Empathy Strategic Scott Wildman Input Strategic Achiever Activator Learner Simone Zimmer Learner Achiever Responsibility Relator Belief Tanya Wallace-Gobern Strategic Relator Individualization Focus Connectedness Michael Hurley 1Strategic 2Achiever 3Relator 4Self-Assurance 5Competition Hal Ruddick 1Learner 2Achiever 3Input 4Responsibility 5Intellection
Promotional Structure – The Committee is in the process of refining the plan. Once completed, it will be brought to the Executive Board for review. Professional Development - Not to do large trainings this year. Slated topics for upcoming events: October: “Relaxation Techniques” – Ann Dixon November: “Marketing Yourself” February: “Inter-Cultural Training” “Working with Budgets” Announcements Meeting with President Refreshments before – tea, coffee, water, donuts, etc. Order for 50. Pictures on COAP website Will take pictures of board at next meeting Meeting Schedule Second Thursday of the month at 11am October 11 *October 16 – Meeting with the President – 10am, Capitol Rooms and QC218 November 8 December 13 January 10 February 14 March 14 April 11 *May 7 – Meeting with the President – 10am Capitol Rooms and QC218 May 9 *Indicates different meeting dates/times Adjourn (Hare, Tibbitts) – 12:15pm
CG Area Phone +3hrs +3hrs Shetland 01595 692 976 0710 1910 Liverpool 0151 931 3341 0730 1930 Stornoway 01851 702 013 0710 1910 Aberdeen 01224 592 334 0730 1930 Belfast 02891 463 933 0810 2010 BBC R4 1201/1754 LW 0048 0520 CG Area Phone +3hrs +3hrs Shetland 01595 692 976 0710 1910 Liverpool 0151 931 3341 0730 1930 Stornoway 01851 702 013 0710 1910 Aberdeen 01224 592 334 0730 1930 Belfast 02891 463 933 0810 2010 BBC R4 1201/1754 LW 0048 0520 CG Area Phone +3hrs +3hrs Shetland 01595 692 976 0710 1910 Liverpool 0151 931 3341 0730 1930 Stornoway 01851 702 013 0710 1910 Aberdeen 01224 592 334 0730 1930 Belfast 02891 463 933 0810 2010 BBC R4 1201/1754 LW 0048 0520 CG Area Phone +3hrs +3hrs Shetland 01595 692 976 0710 1910 Liverpool 0151 931 3341 0730 1930 Stornoway 01851 702 013 0710 1910 Aberdeen 01224 592 334 0730 1930
2e Is the project a recommended action in a Coastal Zone Management Plan or Coastal Management Program? Yes or No If yes, provide details, including priority and how does it support the Coastal Zone Management Plan or Coastal Management Program objectives, and does the project address high risk or legacy issues? Project details 3 Program stream Relates to the funding priorities outlined in the Grant Application Guidelines. Select only ONE of the following Coastal vulnerability area Coastal wetlands and littoral rainforest area Coastal environment area Coastal use area 4a Project activity Select only ONE from the following. These activities are required to be priorities in a certified Coastal Zone Management Plan or Coastal Management Program Studies into and formation of development rules and setbacks, formation of a Development Control Plans or Local Environment Plan Habitat restoration and/or conservation including revegetation and erosion control Dredging for environmental benefit* Community education programs including interpretive signage Management of salinity/acid sulfate soils Invasive and animal management Monitoring of estuary and coastal environment Preconstruction activities for erosion reduction or management structures* Stormwater management Construction activities for erosion reduction or management structures* nourishment* activities are not required to be priorities in a certified Coastal Zone Management Plan or Coastal Management Program Management and stabilisation of dune systems Formalise or reduce the number of beach access points to reduce environmental damage/impact Estuarine riparian restoration Littoral rainforest regeneration Coastal wetland rehabilitation Beach scraping *You must have completed an Investigation and Design for infrastructure works valued at over $500,000 total project cost prior to applying for funding. See guidelines for what is required where total project costs will be $1 million or more. 4b If the applicant is intending on undertaking infrastructure has an investigation and design for the works been completed?** Yes or No 4c If the applicant is intending on undertaking works (where the total project cost is $1 million or more), has a Cost Benefit Analysis for the works been completed?** Yes or No 4d If the applicant is intending on undertaking works (where the total project cost is $1 million or more), has a Distribution Analysis for the works been completed?** Yes or No
Please provide the latitude and longitude. This can be taken directly from a map, or from Google Maps. Go to and find your project location, right click on the map on the project location and in the menu that appears select ‘what’s here’. The co-ordinates will appear in the search box above the map. Latitude Longitude If the project location falls across more than one local government area (LGA), Local Land Services (LLS) region, electorate or catchment, please identify the primary one first. LGA* LLS* State electorate/s* Catchment (if applicable) * LGA, LLS Region, State Electorate and Catchment information required for Program reporting purposes only. 7a Budget overview. Please make sure these amounts match those in the project plan (More details must be provided in the project plan at question 19.) below must include all funding sources. Partner contributions must be removed from the whole project cost prior to applying the funding ratio. Please to the guidelines to determine the appropriate funding levels i.e. for parts of the projects that reduce coastal hazards and those that do not. Applicant’s contribution (excluding GST) Partner contribution (excluding GST) Grant amount sought (excluding GST) Total amount (excluding GST) Funding level sought (Public benefit derived from the Distributional Analysis and Cost Benefit Analysis) Funding sought for that directly reduce/mitigate coastal hazards $ $ $ $ % Funding contribution towards private works that may have some broader state benefit $ $ $ $ % Additional elements of the project that do not directly reduce/mitigate coastal hazards $ $ $ $ % Total $ $ $ $ % 7b Funding contribution towards private that may have some broader public benefit. A maximum of 10% to be equally matched by Council can be applied. Please provide a detailed justification of the benefits of the proposed private asset protection works.
LICENCE No: A1/9999__________ APPROVED OPERATORS NAME: _____John Smith____________________ MONTH: ___AUGUST__________ YEAR: ___2018_______ NIL RETURN (tick, if appropriate): MONTHLY MARKET DETAILS SPECIES (Specify) CUT swim bladder) WEIGHT SOLD (kg) STORAGE (fresh/frozen) VALUE ($ / KG) DESTINATION TRADERS NAME or LICENCE STATE Black Jewfish Trunk 508 Fresh 8.0 B1/999 NT Jewfish Fillet 80 Fresh 13.5 B1/999 NT Black Jewfish Swim bladder 16.8 Fresh 650.0 B1/1234 NT Golden Snapper Whole 18 Fresh 6.0 Bob’s Fish Shack NT Grass Emperor Whole 10 Fresh 4.5 B1/999 NT Coral Trout Whole 4 Fresh 9.0 B1/999 NT
internship affiliates and communities of interest to enhance the program. 2 SUPPORT PERSONNEL (clerical, academic, ancillary) Provide support personnel/services to ensure achievement of program and outcomes (e.g. admissions, registrar, advising, tutoring, clerical) 3 CURRICULUM Provide specialty core and support courses to ensure the achievement of program goals and learning domains. Meet or exceed the content and competency demands of the latest edition of the documents referenced in Standard III.C. 4 FINANCIAL RESOURCES (fiscal support, acquisition /maintenance of equipment /supplies, continuing education) Provide fiscal support for personnel, acquisition and maintenance of equipment/supplies, and continuing education. 5 FACILITIES (classroom, lab, offices, ancillary); Provide adequate classroom,
APPENDIX F2 – Field Internship Institutional Data Form Accreditation Self Study Report AFFILIATE #: [ ] FIELD INTERNSHIP AFFILIATION MATRIX Name: Address: Administrative Officer: Telephone #: Distance from location of program? [ ] miles Is there a signed, current agreement with this affiliate? [ ] Yes [ ] No Who supervises the students? [ ] field agency personnel [ ] program personnel Are the preceptors formally trained? [ ] Yes [ ] No For how many Is there a quality improvement program that reviews runs? [ ] Yes [ ] No Assistive Technology # observations Seating and mobility AAC (Augmentative/alternative communication) Cognitive and Executive Function Aids Education/learning/accessible instructional materials Computer and mobile device access ADL (e.g., EADL-Electronic aids to daily living, dressing, bathing, etc.) Sensory aids Recreation Environmental modification
LICENCE No: A1/9999__________ APPROVED OPERATORS NAME: _____John Smith____________________ MONTH: ___AUGUST__________ YEAR: ___2018_______ NIL RETURN (tick, if appropriate): MONTHLY MARKET DETAILS SPECIES (Specify) CUT (trunk/fillet/G&G/whole/ swim bladder) WEIGHT SOLD (kg) STORAGE (fresh/frozen) VALUE ($ / KG) DESTINATION TRADERS NAME or LICENCE STATE Jewfish Trunk 508 Fresh 8.0 B1/999 NT Black Jewfish Fillet 80 Fresh 13.5 B1/999 NT Black Jewfish Swim bladder 16.8 Fresh 650.0 B1/1234 NT Golden Snapper Whole 18 Fresh 6.0 Bob’s Fish NT Grass Emperor 10 Fresh 4.5 B1/999 NT Coral Trout Whole 4 Fresh 9.0 B1/999 NT Official use only
LICENCE No: A1/________________ APPROVED OPERATORS NAME: _________________________________________ MONTH: _______________________ YEAR: _____________ NIL RETURN (tick, if appropriate): MONTHLY MARKET DETAILS SPECIES (Specify) CUT (trunk/fillet/G&G/whole/ swim bladder) WEIGHT SOLD (kg) STORAGE VALUE ($ / KG) DESTINATION TRADERS NAME or LICENCE STATE Official use only
Do you have any friends or relatives employed by this company? If Yes, please provide their names and relationship to you: Yes No I certify that I am a U.S. citizen, permanent resident, or a foreign national with authorization to work in the United States. Yes No If you are under 18 years of age, can you provide proof of your eligibility to work? Yes No Have you been convicted of a felony? Yes No If yes, explain: Education Name and Address of School Years Completed Major Degree or Diploma High School HS Diploma GED Undergraduate College AA AAS AS AECE ABS AOS Other: _______ Graduate/ Professional BA BS MA MS Other: _______ Business/ Technical CDA Other:________ Other: _______ Have you completed any Early Childhood Education courses? Yes No If yes, how many?______ List any seminars, classes or other education not listed above which may help qualify you for this position Employment History
Table 5.1 - Vessel characteristics (base case scenario) Officers Ratings Ship code Register Tax treatment Nationality Wage rates Nationality Wage rates Min. wages Company tax Depreciation B1a Australian General Register No special treatment Australian EA Australian EA SIA Part A 30% 20 years prime cost B1b Australian General Register ITE Australian EA Australian EA SIA Part A 0% N/A B1c Australian General Register Accelerated depreciation Australian EA Australian EA SIA Part A 30% 20% reducing balance B3a Foreign Temporary Licence Foreign ITF Foreign ITF ITF 0% N/A B3b Foreign Temporary Licence Foreign SIA Part B Foreign SIA Part B SIA Part B 0% N/A B3c Foreign Transitional General Licence Australian EA Australian EA SIA Part A 0% N/A
Table 5.3 - Daily time charter financial costs ($ per day) Base Case Code Register Ship type Handy Size Bulk Carrier Panamax Bulk Carrier Capesize Bulk Carrier Product Tanker Container Ship PT 20 CT 100 B1a General Register Reduced crew – no special tax treatment 31665 47219 28377 45579 B1b General Register Reduced crew – ITE 31156 34868 28199 43661 B1c General Register Reduced crew – accelerated depreciation 30986 34896 41672 27880 35402 44125 B3a Foreign Temporary licence – ITF 15486 18752 22201 13974 16233 24075 B3b Foreign Temporaray Licence – SIA B 22551 32059 26134 17773 20166 28007 B3c Foreign Temporary General Licence 28770 32035 41543 38482 32513 Policy Case P1a General Register Reduced crew – no special tax treatment 35817 47219 42883 45579 P1b General Register Reduced crew – ITE 31156 34868 41406 28199 35532 43661 P1c General Register Reduced crew – accelerated depreciation 34896 45450 27880 35402 44125 P3a Foreign Temporary licence – ITF 18752 28259 22201 16233 24075 P3b Foreign Temporary licence – SIA A 19484 22914 32565 27585 17972 21617 29187 P3f Foreign Mix crew (Australian Master & Chief Engineer 16228 23231 17262 25104
COASTAL PROCESSES_ THE TOOLS AA 2016-2017 Contents derive partly from Text and formulas marked in blue or grey are not part of the course program; Paragraphs in italics provide exercises to be carried out in the classroom or as homework The sea was wet as wet be, The sands were dry as dry. The Walrus and the Carpenter Were walking close at hand: They wept like anything to see Such quantities of sand: “If this were only cleared away," They said, “it would be grand!” “If seven maids with seven mops Swept it for half a year, Do you suppose," the Walrus said, “That they could get it clear?” “I doubt it," said the Carpenter, And shed a bitter tear. Carrol Sediments
Conference Exhibitor Registration Form & Application/Contract for Exhibit Space (to be printed in Exhibition Directory) Company Name Address City State Zip Code Telephone Fax Website Contact Person Email * (Required) Office Contact Person who will receive confirmations and other exhibitor information Company Description *We can not accept handwritten Descriptions Premium Exhibit Booth Fee $4,000.00 Exhibit booth includes seminar registration badges for 2 company representatives Registrants Information - name of person(s) attending * Required First Mid Last Name Suffix Email Item Amount Price Total Exhibit Booth 1 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 Extra Exhibit Staff @ $750 each. Please list below 0 $750.00 $0.00
INSURANCE It is the responsibility of each exhibitor to maintain such insurance against injury to person or damage or loss of property in such amounts as the exhibitor deems adequate. Insurance protection will not be afforded to the exhibitor either by the meeting organizers or the the host Hotel. LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION “The exhibitor assumes all responsibility for any and all loss, theft or damage to exhibitor's displays, equipment and other property while on hotel premises, and hereby waives any claim or demand it may have against the host Hotel or its affiliates arising from such loss, theft or damage. In addition, the exhibitor agrees to defend (if requested), indemnify and hold harmless Global Academy for Medical Education (GLOBAL) and the host Hotel and their respective parent, subsidiary and other related or affiliated companies from and against any liabilities, obligations, claims, damages, suits, costs and expenses, including, without limitation, attorneys' fees and costs, arising from or in connection with the exhibitor's occupancy and use of the exhibition premises or any part thereof or any negligent act, error or omission of the exhibitor or its employees, subcontractors or agents.” In case any part of the exhibition hall is destroyed or damaged so as to prevent the hotel from permitting an exhibitor to occupy assigned space during any part or the whole of the exhibition period, or in case occupation of assigned space during any part or the whole of the exposition period is prevented by strikes, Acts of God, national emergency or other cause beyond the control of the meeting organizers, then the exhibitor will be charged for space only for the period the space was or could have been occupied by exhibitor; and the exhibitor hereby waives any claim against the meeting organizers, its directors, officers, agents, or employees for losses or damages which may arise in consequence of such inability to occupy assigned space. Contact: DEVIN GREGORIE dgregorie@frontlinemedcom.com P(516) 381-8613; Fax 631 350 7251
Formative Assessment Rubrics – Module 5: Coastal Catastrophes Question # Question Type Point Value(s) Points Earned Lesson 2 Question 1 Response 3 for advanced answer 2 for average answer 1 for attempted answer 0 for off-topic or no response Lesson 2 Question 2 Short Response 3 for advanced answer 2 for average answer 1 for attempted answer 0 for off-topic or no response Lesson 2 Question 3 Fill in the blank 1 Lesson 2 Question 4 Short Response 3 for advanced answer 2 for average answer 1 for attempted answer 0 for off-topic or no response Lesson 2 Question 4 a,b,c Fill in the blank 1 Lesson 2 Question 5 Fill in the blank 1 Lesson 2 Question 6 Fill in the blank 1 Lesson 2 Question 7 Fill in the blank/ Ordering 1 Lesson 2 Question 8 Fill in the blank / Ordering 1 Lesson 2 Question 9 Fill in the blank 1 Lesson 2 Question 10 Fill in the blank / Ordering 1 Total Points /out of 17
Social Enterprise development Longer working lives – people cannot afford to retire Grey Consumer – have very strong lobbying power as older people still have resources Individual giving/sustainability – will not keep organisation going as less people donate to our cause Urban Rural split and the complexity this can create in terms of service delivery and differing needs Public expenditure – statutory agencies and funders are expecting the same service for less Social Demographics and diversity – there are many types of older people, Partnership needs to agree on who its target groups are Fuel poverty affecting more older people Reform of Care – TYC, ‘Who Cares?’ Report Eternal Youth – how we view ageing Volunteering – increase numbers of volunteers available to us; increasing their role in delivery Social housing needs for the delivery of older people Isolation and loneliness of older people Digital divide – are older people excluded? How do we include them? LGB&T – older people living with HIV and no services available Welfare Reform and its impact Intergenerational Solidarity – how do we do this without it being forced Technological ‘Connected health’ e.g. Telecare – important for funding sub group Digital inclusion – access to information, social opportunities, access to services Social media – great way to touch base and keep in touch, but lack of control on it Advice/scam/frauds – need advice for older people New technology may be seen as a barrier 3.2 Statistics In N. Ireland the population figures for aged over 65: 263,720 (14.5%)
Send strategic plan to key stakeholders to inform them of opportunities of joint working Sharing of skills and resources. Identify partnership opportunities with other sectors Encourage organisations to attend COAST strategic partnership meetings to widen partners awareness of other current services available co-ordinate Interagency working to improve choice of services and activities for older people Improved service delivery and increased opportunities for service delivery To compliment Health and Council services and activities for older people To co-ordinate age well programmes for active living on identified gaps Work in collaboration with member groups to deliver health & well-being programmes to older people per year i.e. Health Fairs, Events, Community safety/ Falls prevention/ Fuel Poverty events To support Good Morning and Handy person scheme promote Collaborative working To assist in producing a comprehensive directory for the causeway area on organisations providing services for older people Share contact details of relevant organisations working with older people within each current District. representatives from COAST to join other forums and partnerships i.e. Age NI Consultative forum, Age Sector Platform, NHSCT Older People’s Panel To hold yearly networking days across Causeway COAST and Glens Encourage further signposting through a new referral system and website Theme 4: Campaigning and lobbying
Cincinnati Preschool Promise Cost of Quality Committee Meeting September 22, 2017 – 2:00 to 3:30 PM United Way of Greater Cincinnati – Success By 6 Conference Room Agenda Item # Time Description Action Request Speaker 1 2:00 PM Welcome and Call to Order Roll Call Agenda Approval Review and Approval of 8/11/17 Minutes Approval Tim Fogarty 2 2:10 PM Cost of Quality Committee Work Plan Review Information Stephanie Byrd 3 2:25 PM Review of Salary Survey Information Vanessa White 4 2:45 PM Administration and Analysis of Survey Data Approval Tim Fogarty 6 3:00 PM Adequacy of the “$8581” for Tuition Reimbursement Information Tim Fogarty 7 3:30 PM Adjourn Tim Fogarty Future Committee Meetings: October 17, 2017 – 2:00 to 3:30 PM November 21, 2017 – 2:00 to 3:30 PM December 11, 2017 – 2:00 to 3:30 PM Held at United Way of Greater Cincinnati
Initiation One Team Official Per Ten Players All Team Officials One Team Official Per Ten Players Novice Head Coach All Team Officials One Team Official Atom, Atom Female Head Coach Head All Team Officials One Team Official Peewee A, B, C, D, Female Head Coach Head Coach All Team Officials One Team Official Peewee AA Head Coach Head Coach All Team Officials One Team Official Bantam A, B, C, D, Female Head Coach Head Coach All Team Officials One Team Official Bantam AA Head Coach* Head All Team Officials One Team Official Bantam Female AAA Head Coach* Head Coach All Team Officials One Team Official Bantam AAA Head Coach Head Coach All Team Officials One Team Official Midget A, B, C, D, Female Head Coach Head Coach All Team Officials One Team Official Midget Female AA Head Coach* Head All Team Officials One Team Official Minor Midget AAA Head Head Coach All Team Officials One Team Official Midget Female AAA Head Coach Head Coach All Team Officials One Team Official Midget AAA Head Coach Head Coach All Team Officials One Team Official Junior B, C, Female Head Coach All Team Officials*** One Team Official Junior A Head Coach All Team Officials*** One Team Official Senior Female All Team Officials*** One Team Official Senior Male All Team Officials*** One Team Official
__________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________
PUBLIC RELEASE OF 2016 ELECTION COMMITMENT COSTING Name of proposal costed: The Coalition’s Policy to Protect Australia’s Threatened Species Costing Identifier: COA 018 Summary of costing: The policy provides $5.0 million for a Threatened Species Recovery Fund. The intent of the policy is to provide funding for community-led work to protect Australian threatened species. Person making the request: Prime Minister Date costing request received: 17/06/2016 Date of public release of policy: 05/06/2016 Date costing completed: 24/06/2016 Additional information requested (including date): Not applicable. Additional information received (including date): Not applicable. Financial implications (outturn prices)(a)(b) Impact on 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Underlying Cash Balance ($m) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Fiscal Balance ($m) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 A positive number for the fiscal balance indicates an increase in revenue or a decrease in expenses or net capital investment in accrual terms. A positive number for the underlying cash balance indicates an increase in revenue or a decrease in expenses or net capital investment in cash terms. The cost of the proposal ($5.0 million over the Forward Estimates) is fully offset. Funding for this policy will be provided through the National Landcare Program – emerging priorities measure in the 201617 Budget. Where relevant, state that the proposal has been costed as a defined or specified amount. The policy provides $5.0 million for a Threatened Species Recovery Fund, commencing as soon as practical in 2016-17 to 2018-19. Where relevant, include separate identification of revenue and expense components. Not applicable. Where appropriate, include a range for the costing or sensitivity analysis. Not applicable.
PUBLIC RELEASE OF 2016 ELECTION COMMITMENT COSTING Name of proposal costed: Regional Student Access to Education Package Costing Identifier: COA 034 Summary of costing: FIRST ELEMENT: reduce, from 18 months to 14 months, the period that regional and remote students need to be employed under the self-supporting criteria for Youth Allowance and ABSTUDY living allowance commencing in 2017-18. SECOND ELEMENT: 1,200 new rural and regional enterprise scholarships for undergraduate, postgraduate and vocational education students to undertake STEM studies, commencing in 2017-18. THIRD ELEMENT: provide up to $44.7 million over the forward estimates in additional support for isolated children, including $3.9 million to increase the existing Assistance for Isolated Children’s (AIC) Additional Boarding Allowance by 50 per cent from 1 January 2017. FOURTH ELEMENT: an independent comprehensive review into equity of access, aspiration and achievement of rural and regional students to seek fresh ideas and fresh thinking to bridge the divide. Person making the request: Prime Minister Date costing request received: 23/06/2016 Date of public release of policy: 22/06/2016 Date costing completed: 27/06/2016 Additional information requested (including date): Not applicable. Additional information received (including date): Not applicable. Financial implications (outturn prices)(a) Impact on 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Underlying Cash Balance ($m) -11.2 -31.8 -51.7 -53.0 Fiscal Balance ($m) -11.2 -31.8 -51.7 -53.0
COACH the Journey: Committee Chair Reflections on Guiding Doctoral Students Abstract Since 1976, online college-level education has significantly broadened access to higher education. A natural extension of the online model has been to offer doctoral level graduate programs. However, coaching students to achieve success in the doctoral studies is considerably more challenging than guiding them through their formal structured course work. The purpose of this phenomenological research study was to explore the lived experiences of doctoral chairs with ten or more years of demonstrated success guiding students through successful dissertations. These chairs were queried in order to discover practices, guidelines, and tips for assisting doctoral students. Participants were solicited from a unique online professorial group on a public website who had at least ten-years of experience as online doctoral chairs. The researchers’ questions invited comments in two areas: 1) From their perspectives as experienced dissertation committee chairs what essential actions, activities, and services helped insure doctoral students were successful completing dissertations? 2) What were the lived experiences of online doctoral chairs contributing to successful approved student dissertations? The researchers purposively selected a nonprobabilistic, convenience sample consisting of 11 experienced doctoral committee chairs to capture and understand the lived experiences of successful dissertation chairs. Three nodal themes were identified describing how online chairs helped students successfully complete dissertations. These were (1) by demonstrating empathy and support, (2) by teaching students how to plan and meet goals, and (3) by providing regular consistent communications. Three additional nodal themes described issues students faced completing their studies. These were (1) frustration and confusion cause by lack of face-to-face communications and student candor, (2) competition for student attention and time from students’ work commitments, and (3) students’ poor time and project management compounded by weak prioritization skills. The researchers summarized their findings with the COACH model (Cheer, Organize, Act, Communicate, and Help) of effective action. Keywords: committee chair, reflections, qualitative, coaching, dissertation students, successful dissertations, The Exchange Introduction The number of PhDs awarded has grown significantly over the years, particularly since WWII. The growth continued until 2010 when the data showed a flattening trend for males and an increasing trend for females (Chiswick, Larsen, & Pieper, 2010). May 2014 data from the National Science Foundation showed a 1.7% drop in US students but a 4.3% increase in foreign
PUBLIC RELEASE OF 2016 ELECTION COMMITMENT COSTING Name of proposal costed: Reduction in the Wage Subsidy Pool Costing Identifier: COA 052 Summary of costing: The commitment is to achieve savings of $254.4 million over the forward estimates by capping the amount of funding in the wage subsidy pool for wage subsidies other than PaTH (Prepare – Trial – Hire, announced as part of the Youth Employment Package in the 2016-17 Budget). Person making the request: Prime Minister Date costing request received: 29/06/2016 Date of public release of policy: 28/06/2016 Date costing completed: 30/06/2016 Additional information requested (including date): Not applicable. Additional information received (including date): Not applicable. Financial implications (outturn prices)(a) Impact on 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Underlying Cash Balance ($m) 57.2 66.5 65.6 65.1 Fiscal Balance ($m) 57.2 66.5 65.6 65.1 A positive number for the fiscal balance indicates an increase in revenue or a decrease in expenses or net capital investment in accrual terms. A positive number for the underlying cash balance indicates an increase in revenue or a decrease in expenses or net capital investment in cash terms. Where relevant, state that the proposal has been costed as a defined or specified amount. The proposal has been costed at a specified saving amount of $254.4 million over the Forward Estimates. Where relevant, include separate identification of revenue and expense components. Not applicable. appropriate, include a range for the costing or sensitivity analysis. Not applicable. Qualifications to the costing (including reasons for the costing not being comprehensive). Not applicable. Where relevant, explain effects of departmental expenses.
As specified in the costing request, any departmental expenses including ICT costs relating to this commitment will be met from within the existing resources of the Department of Employment. Where relevant, explain the reason for any significant differences between the assumptions specified in a party costing request and those used in a Treasury or Finance costing. Not applicable. Other comments (including reasons for significant differences between the estimated impact on the fiscal and underlying cash balances). Not applicable. Background information Costing methodology used: The proposal will cap funding for wage subsidy pool for the wage subsidies other than PaTH at $357.9 million over the forward estimates. Consistent with the costing request, the costing assumes that wage subsidies other than the youth wage subsidies available under the PaTH program would be capped at a reduced level that is $254.4 million less than the existing funding over the Forward Estimates. Changes to the Wage Subsidy Pool will be as follows (in underlying cash impact terms): The savings would be redirected to fully offset the costs of the Coalition’s policies for Restoring Fairness and Transparency to Australian Workplaces (costing COA 028, $54.4 million over four years)and the Regional Jobs package (costing CO A037, $200.0 million over four years).
FEE STRUCTRURE FOR THE YEAR 2016 1. Direct payment to school account Tanzanians Non Tanzanians (US $) Application fee 30,000 20 Tuition fee 850,000 850 Graduation contribution 50,000 50 Total 930,000/- 920/- 2. Direct payment to student Accommodation in three months 180,000 180 Meals 500,000 500 Field work 150,000 150 Medical capitation 50,000 50 Caution money 30,000 30 Total 910,000/- 910/- The student should bring the following: One white Clinical coat One examination torch
Republic of the Philippines Commission on Audit REGIONAL OFFICE NO. IV-A Commonwealth Avenue, Quezon City Telefax: 951-3810 Form No. Rev: Jan 2009 NOMINATION FORM Date Filed: Course Title: Date Covered: WE ARE NOMINATING THE FOLLOWING PERSONNEL TO THE ABOVE- NAMED COURSE NAME POSITION REMARKS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Supervising Auditors/Head of Office/Agency _________________________________ Signature Over Printed Name _________________________________ Designation Office/ Agency: Tel Nos.: Office Address: Fax Nos.: e-mail Address: FOR REGION IV-A TRAINING UNIT (Action on Nomination) NOMINATIONS SEMINAR: CONFIRMED CANCELLED NOT CONFIRMED DEFERRED, NEW DATE_________________
This application is made on the following grounds: [insert as applicable] Date: *delete if inapplicable. Note: An application other than for leave to appeal or cross-appeal must be filed with an affidavit and any additional documents required to be filed, at the time of commencing the application, by any applicable practice direction. An application must be accompanied by the applicable filing fee. Signed [Name of lawyer /self-represented party]
Of the 11 Ecological Vegetation Classes mapped as being present at the time of European settlement 7 of those classes are considered to be threatened in Victoria. Endangered Plains Grassy Woodland Swamp Scrub Swampy Riparian Woodland Plains Grassy Wetland Scoria Cone Woodland Vulnerable Valley Grassy Forest Grassy Forest Status of Assets Major waterways The team ranked the overall condition of the riparian vegetation rivers and creeks in the area from 0 to 3. The process provided a rough estimate only and could be refined (probably by reach) using Index of Stream condition data or on-ground assessments. It indicated that all waterways are in relatively poor condition however within a waterway certain reaches were in better condition than other reaches. Status (rough estimate – 3 Good, 1 Poor Riparian vegetation extent Vegetation width (ISC) Riparian Fragmentation (ISC) Deep pools (number remaining wet in dry periods) Campaspe Upper 1 2 Information available – Index of Stream Condition – NCCMA to help? Five Mile Creek 1 Slaty Creek 2 Smokers 1 Yelka Ck North (to Boundary Rd) Lower 2 1 Yelka Ck South 1 Camels Hump Creek Upper Lower 2 1 Creek from the Jim Upper 2 1
1. Familiarization & Orientation Teacher logs onto platform and completes the orientation August 2. Self-Assessment Teacher completes the self-assessment prior to pre-evaluation conference 3. Pre-Evaluation Conference Can be done as a group, team, individual Notes are taken and documented in platform 4. FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT CYCLE 1 Walkthrough #1 (10 minutes min.) Mark 2-3 standards in platform (recommended) Share w/ teacher within 5 days via electronic platform Teacher does not sign off on, just gets feedback End of September 5. Walkthrough #2 (10 minutes min.) Evaluator marks 2-3 standards in platform (recommended) Share w/ teacher within 5 business days via electronic platform Teacher does not sign off on, just gets feedback End of October 6. Formative observation #1 (30 minutes min.) End of November 7. Formative assessment #1 Must be complete within 5 working days of the most recent Formative Observation Evaluator uses information from Formative Observation #1, walkthroughs 1 & 2, other interactions, etc. Evaluator completes formative assessment form in platform Evaluator marks all 10 standards (commentary suggested/recommended) Evaluator saves changes in platform & SHARES WITHIN 5 business days of observation date Teacher reviews & must sign off in platform that it was received Within 5 working days of most recent Formative Observation 8. Mid-Year Conference Can be done as a team, individually In looking at your self-assessment & goals, how is it going? Have you been supported? How can I support you further? Look at student DATA, assessments, growth, adjustments made to instruction Notes are taken and loaded into platform January 15th 9. FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT CYCLE 2 Walkthrough #3 (10 minutes min.) Mark 2-3 standards in platform (recommended) Share w/ teacher within 5 days via electronic platform Teacher does not sign-off on this component, just gets feedback End of February 10. Walkthrough #4 (10 minutes min.) End of March
Cobram Regional Park Dead River Beach Dead End Beach Big Tom’s Bend MAIDMENT RD Cobram Regional Park Little Tom’s Bend ARRAMAGONG ST To Tocumwal 18km KAROOK ST HO CT KAROOK ST CAMBER ASHTON ST GLENAVON ST ST Thompsons Beach Thompsons Beach
High School Employment Agency Job Service City Hall Postings City's Website Posting Previous City Employee Radio/TV Ad Name: News Paper Ad Name: Employee Referral Name: Other__________________ Female ONE OF THE FOLLOWING ETHNIC GROUPS: American Indian / Alaskan Native Asian / Pacific Islander Black Caucasian / White (not Hispanic origin) Hispanic CHECK YES OR NO TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: VETERAN Yes No AGE 40-70 Yes No
Intent is to measure where we are now and make improvements in areas the needed New Data Completeness Report Bowman has released revised version of Data Completeness Report that pulls in other data elements that we are not currently monitoring though they are required by HUD Will help provide where data is missing if there is any missing data ROI for HMIS Participating Agencies-HMIS participating agency list has changed Some agencies have been removed and some have been added Important to use the most up-to-date ROI Voices of Count-Chapin Hall Research Study-Niki P Travis County was contacted by Chapin Hall-implementing a nation-wide to conduct a youth count in 28 communities across the nation Travis County is the only community in Texas First stakeholder meeting held last week-included new and exciting stakeholders Research will serve as the foundation work for ending youth homelessness in our community Chapin Hall staff will come assist with conducting a youth count in May or June Conducting more in-depth research with roughly 30-40 youth Would strongly like this to be youth-led and have funding for youth that participate ECHO will be lead agency in partnership with multiple agencies Looking to have a very diverse stakeholder group HUD SNAPS program to release very competitive grant of $33M for 10 communities to apply for youth homelessness planning funds-not sure of timeframe yet but would strongly like to be included 10:20-11:00 HUD Continuum of Care Niki P. / Katy Manganella NAEH Conference-HUD Q&A Updates Director of SNAPS informed that HUD will be announcing Tier I and Tier II funds separately; Tier I will be announced first and Tier II will be announced later 2016 CoC NOFA may be released prior to the GIW process 2016 NOFA will focus on implementing system performance measures Each community will be measuring their own success rather than having communities competing Would like to be ahead of the game and start using our data to prepare for this change Review of New Performance Score Card Previous Performance Score Cards were not serving us well Focusing on data completeness, project utilization, data completeness reports Look at which items are still being monitored by HUD like to move away from being a monitoring tool that only ECHO is using but rather a tool that the agencies can use Need to improve our monitoring of Annual Assessments as it is a HUD requirement and we have not been monitoring this in the past
Attachment 2 (Continued) Types and Quantities of Solid Waste Processed 2.D - Type III Separation and Composting Facility Provide a summary of product use. Enter the code that applies from the table below or the name of the material shipped off-site for recycling/re-use (in wet tons ONLY). Enter the name of the person receiving the material for reuse, recycling, or resale. Also, enter the mailing address, the name of a contact person, and the telephone number. All calculations used to compute the quantity (expressed in wet tons) of solid waste generated at the site must be documented by the permittee and kept as part of the operating record. Separation Facilities Only: What percentage of the total waste stream received by the facility has been reduced? Quantity of Material Shipped Off-Site (Wet Tons) Persons Receiving Material Shipped Off-Site for Code/Name Quantity Recycled Quantity Re-used Name: Mailing Address: Contact Person: Telephone: Received for: Reuse Recycling Quantity of Material Shipped Off-Site (Wet Tons) Persons Receiving Material Shipped Off-Site for Reuse/Recycling Code/Name Quantity Recycled Quantity Re-used Name: Mailing Address: Contact Person: Telephone: Received for: Reuse Recycling Quantity of Material Shipped Off-Site (Wet Tons) Persons Receiving Material Shipped Off-Site for Reuse/Recycling Code/Name Quantity Recycled Quantity Re-used Name: Mailing Address: Contact Person: Telephone: Received for: Reuse Recycling MATERIAL CODES SEPARATION FACILITIES COMPOSTING FACILITIES 01-A Glass M1 Class M1 Compost 01-B Metals M2 MC Compost 01-C Paper S1 Class S1 Compost 01-D Plastic S2 S2 Compost 01-E White Goods YW Class YW Compost 01-F Batteries
Goal: Strategy Action Steps Person/ Organization Responsible Timeframe Relevance CoC Check-up Element(s) FSP Goal(s) HEARTH PM(s) Goal: Strategy Action Steps Person/ Organization Responsible Timeframe Relevance CoC Check-up Element(s) FSP Goal(s) HEARTH PM(s) Goal:
Identifies use of the CO Codes [Chose one – EOC, PLN, PMC, RCC, SIC, TST, SP1, SP2, VOI, (for ODDBALL CODES see Job Aid)]. SSC Special Service Code – [Choose one (or valid combinations up to 4) – A,B,C,I,J,M,N,O,R,S,T,V,W,X,Z,8]. TR DIG EO Number of digits to be outpulsed to a switching entity/POI end office by another carrier (e.g., NPA + NXX + line be 10). TR DIG AT Number of digits to be outpulsed to a switching entity/POI tandem office by another carrier (e.g., NPA + NXX + line would be 10). NXXTYPE Identifies use of CO Code (NXX). (Choose one of listed values provided in the COCAG Part 2 Job Aid). BILL RAO Enter a valid Revenue Accounting Office code. BO Code Enter an appropriate Business Office code. CO Type Company Type – (Choose appropriate value 0-9 provided in the COCAG Part 2 Job Aid). TIME ZONE 0-none, 1-Guam/CNMI, 2-Hawaii/American Samoa, 3-Alaska, 4-Pacific, 5-Moutain, 6-Central, 7-Eastern, 9-Newfoundland. IDDD International Direct Distance Dialing. [Y- if the CO Code (NXX) can place IDDD calls, N – if not]. DIND Dialable Indicator. (Y if directly dialable, N if not). DAYLIGHT [Y – if the CO Code (NXX) serves an area that observes daylight saving, N – if not]. PORTABLE (Y/N) Y if line number can be ported from this CO Code. TEST LINE Information:
Cocaine Intoxication What is cocaine intoxication? Cocaine intoxication is when you become restless and overactive while or shortly after using cocaine. You feel very sensitive and "picked on." You feel angry and destructive. Cocaine is a drug made from the leaves of the coca plant, which grows in South America. It is a stimulant that causes physical and psychological arousal, increased confidence, talkativeness, increased breathing and heart rate, increased energy, and sleeplessness. Cocaine can also numb an area of the body quickly. Some people are more sensitive than others to cocaine. Cocaine intoxication can kill you. What is the cause? Cocaine intoxication occurs when you smoke, snort, or inject too much cocaine. Cocaine stimulates some of the chemicals in the brain and body that change physical states and emotions. At first you feel pleasure, increased energy, and enhanced self-esteem. You also have less anxiety and are less self-conscious. Cocaine also affects sexual behavior. In small doses cocaine increases sexual arousal and makes orgasms and erections easier. In large doses cocaine makes you feel increased sexual desire but you are less able to achieve orgasm. Men may have problems with impotence. These pleasurable feelings make you want to repeat the high. You may need larger and larger doses of cocaine to produce the feelings of the first few doses. This may lead to becoming physically and psychologically dependent on cocaine. The effects of cocaine are short-lived. This may cause you to binge (take the drug continually over several hours, or even a week). This may lead to an overdose. What are the symptoms? You may have these symptoms when you use cocaine, or shortly afterward: a fast or slow heartbeat dilated pupils high or low blood pressure hallucinations (seeing or feeling things that are not such as bugs under your skin) sweating or chills dangerous rise in temperature nausea or vomiting muscle pain or weakness chest pain convulsions increased or decreased level of activity confusion coma. Chronic snorting of cocaine can lead to: sore nasal membranes a tear or other damage to the membrane that separates the left and right nostrils nosebleeds sinusitis rapid heart rates and heart attack stroke premature birth or stillbirth of infants whose mothers use cocaine. How is it diagnosed?
Uitgangsvraag: Bij patiënten met melanoom stadium III en IV (primair dan wel recidief) die in aanmerking komen voor in opzet curatieve/lokale behandeling, welke diagnostische test - FDG PET/CT, contrast CT of whole body MRI - resulteert in de meest accurate opsporing van metastasen? I Study ID II Method III Patient characteristics IV Intervention(s) V Results primary outcome VI Results secondary and other outcomes Critical appraisal of study quality et al, JEADV, 2014 Prospective cohort of funding not mentioned Hospital size: 37 pat March 2011 interval of 7 days between of tests not mentioned Eligibility criteria: Stage IV cutaneous melanoma patients Exclusion cancer, contraindications for MRI Patient characteristics Not reported visceral or lymph node metastases Index test(s) MRI including VIBE and metabolic (diffusion) sequences combined PET-CT, CT and superficial lymph nodes US. Reference standard or sequential imaging during clinical follow-up (at least 9 months) Diagnostic accuracy Lesion based Overall PET-CT Accuracy: 86% 80% (71-87%) 93% (86-97%) 93% (86-98%) 79% (70-87%) CT Accuracy: 81% 90% (83-95%) 70% (60-79%) 79% (71-85%) 85% (75-92%) MRI Accuracy: 70% 68% (59-76%) 73% (63-82%) 77% (68-85%) 63% (53-72%) MRI (VIBE) Accuracy: 85% 84% (76-90%) 87% (79-93%) 90% (83-95%) 80% (71-86%) Overall node PET-CT Accuracy: 96% 96% (78-100%) 97% (83-100%) 96% (78-100) of evidence: B did not receive the same reference standard regardless of the index test result between index test en reference test unclear unclear of reference test unclear
of funding not mentioned one Hospital size: 35 August 2006-April 2007 between tests unclear of tests: unclear melanoma presenting a risk of metastatic spread. Exclusion: patient with a cardiac pace metal devices in the body, allergy to contrast medium, restricted renal function, pregnancy, claustrophobia Patient characteristics given Prevalence of disease (malignant lesions): 70/120 = 58% Reference standard imaging, or follow-up including tumor markers (S100 and lactate dehydrogenase) (6 months) Overall PET-CT 72,9% 92,7% 94,4% 66,7% MRI 82,6% 97,6% 98,3% 76,9% Lung PET-CT: Se 30,7%, Sp 100% MRI: Se 61,5%, Sp 100% Bone PET-CT: Se 71,4%, Sp 100% MRI: Se 82,8%, Sp 100% Liver PET-CT: Se 50%, Sp 100% MRI: Se 100%, Sp 100% Lymph nodes PET-CT: Se 82,7%, Sp 100% MRI: Se 89,6%, Sp N/A patients study bias did not receive the same reference standard regardless of the index test result of reference test unclear unknown Abbreviations: VIBE: Volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination, PET: positron emission tomography, PET-CT: PET/computed tomography, FDG: Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose, WB-MRI: magnetic resonance imaging, NPV: negative predictive value; PPV: positive predictive value