(Exchange Rate Effective {Date 2013}) Currency Unit = Indonesian Rupiah IDR 1.00 = US$ 0.00010 US$1.00 = 9,615.38 IDR FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ADB AIGA AusAID Asian Development Bank Alternative income-generating activity Australian Agency for International Development BAPPEDA BAPPENAS BME Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Derah (Provincial/District Planning Agency) Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional (National Development Planning Agency) Benefit monitoring and evaluation CAS CBM CBO CCRES CCU CDD COREMAP CRMP CRTR Country Assistance Strategy Community-based management Community-based organization Capturing Coral Reef & Related Ecosystem Services Project Country Coordinating Unit Community Driven Development Coral Reef Rehabilitation and Management Program Coral reef management plan Coral Reef Targeted Research & Capacity Building for Management Project DEPDAGRI DKP Ministry of Home Affairs Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries EAP ES East Asia Pacific Ecosystem services GCI GEF Global Change Institute (University of Queensland) Global Environment Facility IDA International Development Association LIPI Indonesian Institute of Sciences MCS MMA MMAF M&E Monitoring, control, and surveillance Marine management area Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Monitoring and evaluation
Harideep Singh Senior Rural Development Specialist Senior Rural Development Specialist EASER 21538 Nina Queen Irving Senior Program Assistant Senior Program Assistant EASER 75930 Minne Kane Lead Legal Counsel GA/Negotiations LEGES 08137 Seble Berhanu Legal Analyst Analyst LEGES 202926 Noel Sta. Ines Senior Procurement Specialist Senior Procurement Specialist EASR1 160430 Stephen Paul Hartung Financial Management Specialist Financial Management Specialist 332812 Juan Martinez Sr Social Development Specialist Safeguards EASIS Non Bank Staff Name Title Office Phone City Melanie King Deputy Director, GCI +61 7 3346 9942 Brisbane, Australia . Locations Country First Administrative Division Potential Pilot Sites Planned Actual Comments Philippines Potential sites: Batangas Palawan Central Visayas or Negros) Northern Luzon Batangas and Palawan have the highest probability of inclusion. Site selection will be undertaken in a phased approach and not all will be finalized until the end of Year One. CCRES sites will be chosen, and studies carried out to look at scalability of modeling and results. Indonesia Potential sites: Biak Raja Ampat Selayar Wakatobi Site selection will be undertaken in a phased approach and finalized by the end of Year One. CCRES sites will be chosen, and studies carried out to look at scalability of modeling and results. .
Key Results Framework Annex 1: Results Framework and Monitoring Country: Capturing Coral Reef & Related Ecosystem Services Project Project Development Objective (PDO): The Project Development Objective is to design and support the uptake of innovative models for valuing mangrove, seagrass and reef ecosystem services to enhance the sustainability of marine-based enterprise and marine spatial planning in select coastal communities in Indonesia and the Philippines. The PDO aims to help communities capture more of the benefits from healthy ecosystems and promote conservation, by demonstrating the links between ecosystem health, local benefit capture and community welfare. PDO Level Results Indicators* Core Unit of Measure Baseline Cumulative Target Values** Frequency Data Source/ Methodology Responsibility for Data Collection Description (indicator definition etc.) YR 1 YR 2 YR3 YR 4 YR 5 Indicator One: Innovative models developed at two or more sites by the project, demonstrating explicit links between ecosystem health, the value of ecosystem services, and their distribution among stakeholders Number of where models are developed Zero Piloted in at least 1 site for at least 1 ecosystem service or sector Piloted in at least 1 site for at least 2 ecosystem services or sectors Piloted in at least 2 sites for at least 2 ecosystem services or sectors Mid-term Year 5 Survey of Project sites adopting the models Component Models relate to (i) eco-system service valuation and distribution, (ii) Marine Reserve Design and Optimization; and (iii) Marine Spatial Planning Indicator Two: Develop new or improve existing business models directly or indirectly linked to coastal marine zone ecosystem services in at least two sites Number of sites with business models developed Zero 1 2 2 Mid-term Year 5 Survey of stakeholders Component Teams Profitable, competitive businesses that have products which benefit from and contribute to coastal marine ecosystems Indicator Three: Project developed models and knowledge products inform the design of regional and national projects, development plans or policies and community based coastal resources management plans. Number of utilizing project- developed models or tools in their design Zero 2 4 5 Mid-term Year 4 Year 5 Requests for technical assistance Documents of projects/plans using these models PEA Core Indicators: Direct project beneficiaries (number), of which female (percentage) Number and percentage tbd
GEF IW Indicator: call for reducing stress to maintain value of ecosystem services IW Number of promoting stress reduction based on models Zero 1 3 5 Government planning documents; GEF and WB pipeline PEA INTERMEDIATE RESULTS Intermediate Result (Component I): Quantifying the value and market potential of mangrove, seagrass and coral reef ecosystem services Intermediate Level Results Indicators Core Unit of Measure Baseline Cumulative Target Values** Frequency Data Source/ Methodology Responsibility for Data Collection Description (indicator definition etc.) YR 1 YR 2 YR3 YR 4 YR5 Intermediate Result indicator One: At least three Models of ecosystem function and services developed Model of service or function Zero 1 2 3 Mid-term Year 5 Articles in peer reviewed journals and reports Protocols developed Surveys of each field site in the project Component Team Three models will be developed relating to the valuation of services, e.g., supporting reef fisheries, eco-tourism, blue carbon, coastal defense, and water filtration. Intermediate Result indicator Two: Innovative, comprehensive decision support systems for marine reserve design which help optimize management objectives developed Number of Decision support systems Zero 1 Pilot Support System 1 System 1 applied in MSP context Mid-term Year 5 Publications Peer reviewed journal articles site surveys Component Team Intermediate Result indicator Three: Planning frameworks that incorporates models of ecosystem MSP framework developed Zero 1 MSP Extended MSP Extended MSP Framework Mid-term Year 5 Peer reviewed publications Component Team
functions and services, including coastal defense, and decision support systems developed in response to stakeholder demand (e.g., local government) in at least one site in at least two sites Decision support system Intermediate Result (Component II): Forging Community-led innovation in capturing and sustaining benefits from marine ecosystem services and enhancing resilience in the face of climate change Intermediate Level Results Indicators Core Unit of Measure Baseline Cumulative Target Values** Frequency Data Source/ Methodology Responsibility for Data Collection Description (indicator definition etc.) YR 1 YR 2 YR3 YR 4 YR5 Intermediate Result indicator One: Develop and analyze system maps for each site detailing interactions between specific ecosystem services and social-economic sectors Number of sites Zero System Map developed four System Map four sites System Map developed and analyzed four sites Year 2 Report produced Peer reviewed journal articles Desktop study Component Team Analysis of sustainable opportunities will use systems thinking and value chain perspective and approach Intermediate Result indicator Two: Nurture new and/or existing businesses that offer products and services linked to ecosystem services in at least two sites Number of sites Zero 1 2 2 Year 3 Mid-term Year 5 Models developed Field site surveys Component Team Eco-business models will be developed for business propositions – reef fishery; blue carbon; water filtration, eco-tourism, among others Intermediate Result indicator Develop affordable decision toolkit for use by stakeholders that is applicable across all sites Toolkit yes/no 1 Mid-term Year 5 Toolkit developed Component Team Intermediate Result (Component III): Promoting behavioral change through outreach, decision support and regional learning from results at selected field sites