The Conference should be encourage countries to adopt the guidelines in the energy, water resources, transport, solid waste, agriculture, forests, and finance areas when developing their domestic policies. Page: 3. Targets and Initiatives 3.1 Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? Absolute target 3.1a Please provide details of your absolute target ID Scope % of emissions in scope % reduction from base year Base year Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) Target year Comment Scope 1 100% 6% 2010 18678 2011 3.1d Please provide details on your progress against this target made in the reporting year ID % complete (time) % complete (emissions) Comment 100 100 The target be reached mainly because of the reduction in the use of fossil fuels in 2011 when compared to 2010. 3.2 Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? Yes 3.2a Please provide details (see guidance) The company has its generation of electricity based in Hydropower plants, a renewable source of clean energy. We believe that the fact could avoid third parties from using electricity from another source which might emit significant quantities of GHGs. 3.3 Did you have emissions reduction initiatives that were active within the reporting year (this can include those in the planning and/or implementation phases) No 3.3d If you do not have any emissions reduction initiatives, please explain why not We did not have any emissions reduction initiatives. The result was a consequence of the reduction in use of fossil fuels, due to less field activities in 2011 when compared to 2010.
company has adopted a proactive position, participating in forums that discuss sector targets together with government authorities. In Brazil, electric energy is mostly supplied by renewable sources; still, unrealistic targets could impact the sector's viability. 5.1b Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions Sector targets could imply financial costs if the company has to adapt any of its processes to meet the targets. In Brazil, electric energy is mostly supplied by renewable sources; still, unrealistic targets could impact the sector's viability. The financial implications, methods adopted and costs associated have not been estimated, because the sector targets have not been published by the government. 5.1c Please describe your risks that are driven by change in physical climate parameters ID Risk driver Description Potential impact Timeframe Direct/ Indirect Likelihood Magnitude of impact Change in temperature extremes The company's distribution and generation activities are directly affected by the changes in temperature. In the generation field, climate changes affect the hydrologic regime, which is associated to the electric energy production. In the distribution, Increased operational cost Current Direct More likely than not Medium
Uncertainty range sources of uncertainty expand on the uncertainty in your data Uncertainty range sources of uncertainty expand on the uncertainty in your data More than 2% but less than or to 5% Assumptions Metering/ Measurement Constraints The main source of emissions on scope 1 is fossil fuel combustion from stationary and mobile sources. These categories have uncertainty defined by IPCC emission factors and activity data uncertainty (mainly from measurement problems). Certain assumptions about the efficiency of wastewater treatment also increase the uncertainty in the inventory, but as the participation of this category is relatively small, that problem does not affect the quality of the inventory in 2011. More than 5% but less than or equal to 10% Assumptions Metering/ Measurement Constraints The GHG emission on this scope is calculated by multiplying the energy consumption described in the electricity bill or lost in Transmission and Distribution (T&D) by the EF provided by Brazilian government. The EF has no uncertainty value associated with it. The analysis about uncertainty from the metering systems used by Brazilian energy companies showed that these equipments present +-3% error from their measurements. For the electricity lost in T&D, as there was no study about its uncertainty, we assumed as After adding the information using IPCC formula, the final uncertainty range was around 10%, as T&D represented the largest component in scope 2 emissions.
SF6 7068.00 Other: HFC 134a 72.93 Other: HFC 152a 0.52 9.2d Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by activity Activity Scope 1 metric tonnes CO2e STATIONARY COMBUSTION 1025.30 MOBILE COMBUSTION 2680.08 FUGITIVE EMISSIONS 7142.21 WASTE WATER TREATMENT 3.23 Page: 10. Scope 2 Emissions Breakdown - (1 Jan 2011 - 31 Dec 2011) 10.1 Do you have Scope 2 emissions sources in more than one country or region (if covered by emissions regulation at a regional level)? Yes 10.1a Please complete the table below Country Scope 2 metric tonnes CO2e Brazil 66865.58 10.2 Please indicate which other Scope 2 emissions breakdowns you are able to provide (tick all that apply) By business division By activity 10.2a Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by business division Business division Scope 2 metric tonnes CO2e LIGHT SESA 66355.38
Motor gasoline 3039.56 Ethanol - Anhydrous 634.50 Further Information In Brazil, vehicles uses Diesel B5 (5% biodiesel added) and Gasoline C (20-25% anhydrous ethanol added) in their combustion. Light has already sorted each fuel in its results. Eletricity consumption includes eletricity lost in transmission and distribution (GHG Protocol). Attachments Page: 13. Emissions Performance 13.1 How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Decreased 13.1a Please complete the table Reason Emissions value (percentage) Direction of change Comment Lower Carbon Intensity in the Brazilian GRID 28.18 Decrease As Light main emissions source (in Scope 1 and 2) is electricity lost in transmission and distribution, its results are very sensitive to changes in the emission factor of Brazilian GRID. Comparing to 2010, this variable decreased in almost 50%. 13.2 Please describe your gross combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions for the reporting year in metric tonnes CO2e per unit currency total revenue Intensity figure Metric numerator Metric denominator % change from Direction of change Reason for Change
previous year from previous year 0.0074 metric tonnes CO2e unit total revenue 32.11 Decrease As Light main emissions source (in Scope 1 and 2) is electricity lost in transmission and distribution, its results are very sensitive to changes in the emission factor of Brazilian GRID. Comparing to 2010, this variable decreased in almost 50%. 13.3 Please describe your combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions for the reporting year in metric tonnes CO2e per full time equivalent (FTE) employee Intensity figure Metric numerator Metric denominator % change from previous year Direction of change from previous year Reason for Change metric tonnes CO2e FTE Employee This information is not avaiable. 13.4 Please provide an additional intensity (normalized) metric that is appropriate to your business operations Intensity figure Metric numerator Metric denominator % change from previous year Direction of change from previous year Reason for Change 3.115 metric tonnes CO2e Other: GWh 21.54 Decrease For LIGHT SESA (Electricity Distribution). Light SESA results are very sensitive to changes in the emission
factor of Brazilian GRID. Comparing to 2010, this variable decreased in almost 50%. 0.164 Other: GWh 22.64 Decrease For LIGHT ENERGIA (Electricity Generation and Transmission). LIGHT ENERGIA results are very sensitive to changes in the emission factor of Brazilian GRID. Comparing to 2010, this variable decreased in almost 50%. Page: 14. Emissions Trading 14.1 Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate so in the next two years 14.2 Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No Page: 2012-Investor-Scope 3 Emissions 15.1 Please provide data on sources of Scope 3 emissions that are relevant to your organization Sources of Scope 3 emissions metric tonnes CO2e Methodology If you cannot provide a figure for emissions, please describe them Waste generated in operations 36621.77 GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and
Reporting Standards 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National GHG Inventories Business travel 523.85 GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standards DEFRA. 2010 Guidelines to Defra / DECC’s GHG Conversion Factors for Company Reporting: Methodology Paper for Emission Factors. 2010 Downstream transportation and distribution 8992.75 GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standards 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National GHG Inventories 15.2 Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 3 emissions Not verified or assured 15.3 Are you able to compare your Scope 3 emissions for the reporting year with those for the previous year for any sources? Yes 15.3a Please complete the table Sources of Scope 3 emissions Reason for change Emissions (percentage) Direction of change Comment Waste generated in operations Other: Improvement 244.09 Increase Due to improvements in data