zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
THE UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING JOB DESCRIPTION This is a description of a staff position at the University of Wyoming not a job opening announcement. Look for current job openings at the following link: . The following statements are intended to describe the general nature and level of work being performed. They are not intended to be construed as an exhaustive list of all responsibilities, duties and skills required of personnel so classified. Title: COORDINATOR, ELLBOGEN CTL Reports To: Designated Supervisor UW Job Code: 3792 UW Job Family: 32 – Administrative Support SOC Code: 25-9031 FLSA: Exempt Pay Grade: 22 Date: 5-21-13 JOB PURPOSE: Assist and advise the Director in the management, strategic planning and decision making for the Ellbogen Center for Teaching and Learning. Provide budgetary oversight, direct and supervise the marketing of the center’s services and programs and oversee the administrative operation of the center. ESSENTIAL DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES: Assist the director in strategic planning, researching complex problems, evaluating current programs and making recommendations on improvements and expansion of the center. Serve as primary resource person for the center, independently appraising, assessing and responding to initial requests for collaboration for programs, events and activities. Independently direct and manage the center’s budget, including full signing authority, monitoring financial reports, cost projections, estimates, allocation of resources as well as any requested reports. Advise the director on fiscal planning. Provide leadership in marketing and promoting the Center’s programs in a variety of venues. Perform event planning, attend college events as required. Assist the Director with directing the operational, financial, personnel and planning functions of the center. Coordinate the day-to-day operations of the center including training, supervision and evaluation of office support staff. Organize regular staff meetings and planning sessions. SUPPLEMENTAL FUNCTIONS: Attend meetings on behalf of the director and attend ECTL events as possible.
Coordinate and assist in the interpretation of the federal guidelines for NCLB to ensure necessary preparations for test administration and proper analysis of test results. Serve as liaison to the Virginia Department of Education (VDOE), scoring vendors, and LEAs on matters related to national, state, and local testing. Effectively communicate guidelines related to test administration and the appropriate use of test results to various groups such as school administrators and teachers. Supervise the ordering of all testing materials and assist with budget planning related to test administration and implementation. Maintain security of testing materials and implement policies and practices to prevent potential breaches in security. Work directly with staff members to effectively coordinate and organize the distribution and collection of all testing materials. Coordinate, develop, and prepare training materials for each test administration. Attend test administration training provided by the state and develop local procedures to ensure compliance with all state mandates and procedures related to testing. Serve a lead role in developing user-friendly reports to assist administrators, school-level administrators, and teachers with analysis and interpretation of assessment results. All other duties as assigned. SUMMARY OF PHYSICAL, SENSORY AND ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS NEEDED TO PERFORM ESSENTIAL JOB DUTIES Not Applicable Rarely = (less than ½ hour per day) Occasionally = (1/2 - 2.5 hours per day) Frequently = (2.5 - 5.5 hours per day) Continually = (5.5 - 8 hours per day) Physical Requirements Lifting: Up to 40 lbs. Carrying: Up to 40 lbs. Pushing/Pulling: Up to 40 lbs. Use of Equipment: Computer, telephone, copier, agency vehicle, fax, typewriter Sitting: Frequently Standing: Frequently Walking: Frequently Bending: Occasionally Stooping: Occasionally Crawling: Not Applicable Climbing: Occasionally Reaching above head: Frequently Grasping: One hand: Frequently Both hands: Frequently Fine Manipulating: One hand: Frequently Both hands: Frequently Environmental Requirements Exposed to marked changes in temperature: Occasionally Outside work: Occasionally Exposure to dust, fumes, odors, water, etc.: Occasionally Exposure to biological, mechanical, electrical and/or chemical hazards: Not applicable (inside) environment: Continuously Noise: Occasionally Sensory Requirements
Last Name: First M.I. Street Address: Apt/Unit# City: State Zip Code Phone: E-Mail Stud ID # LPC staff members must actively maintain communication via Facebook. Are you willing to have/use your Facebook account to meet this job requirement? Yes No What type of work-study award have you received? Need-Based Merit-Based 1st Year 2nd Year Jr. Sr. Grad BA/BS Major(s): Minor(s): Cumulative GPA: Expected Graduation Date: What particular strengths, skills, talents, and experiences make you an ideal candidate for the LPC position? List 2-4 skills or principles you believe are needed to support others well. What are you most seeking in a team you work with? How have you helped a team of your peers work well together and achieve goals? Please email this application form, a current resume, and your class schedule to .
Your schedule will resemble this sample: Nature Trail* Mapping & Orienteering* Teacher Schmidt Center Trail Marker / Location Yellow Orange Blue service building field pavilion Period 1 12:00 - 1:15 A B C D E F Period 2 1:15 - 2:30 F A B C D E Period 3 2:30 - 3:45 E F A B C D Period 4 3:45 -5:00 D E F A B C Walk to Dinner @ 5:10pm / Eat Dinner at 5:30pm Campfire at 7:00pm Wagon Ride at 8:00pm Lights Out at 10:00pm DAY TWO Wakeup @ 6:00am / Remove Luggage by 7:00am / Walk to Breakfast @ 7:10am / Breakfast @ 7:30 Nature Trail* Mapping & Orienteering* Teacher Schmidt Center Staff Marker / Location Yellow Orange Blue service building field pavilion Period 5 8:30 - 9:45 C D E F A B Period 6 9:45 - 11:00 B C D E F A After 11:00am: Closing Ceremony / Eat Lunch / Load Buses and return to school - around 12:00pm
Reporting Calendar The following chart outlines reporting date ranges for use in monitoring pending transactions: Month 30-Day 45-Day 60-Day January 12/1 – 12/31 11/15- 12/31 11/1- 12/31 February 1/1 – 1/31 12/15 – 1/31 12/1 – 1/31 March 2/1 – 2/28 1/15 – 2/28 1/1 – 2/28 April 3/1 – 3/31 2/15 – 3/31 2/1 – 3/31
May 4/1 – 4/30 3/15 – 4/30 3/1 – 4/30 June 5/1 – 5/31 4/15 – 5/31 4/1 – 5/31 July 6/1 – 6/30 5/15 – 6/30 5/1 – 6/30 August 7/1 – 7/31 6/15 – 7/31 6/1 – 7/31 September 8/1 – 8/31 7/15 – 8/31 7/1 – 8/31 October 9/1 – 9/30 8/15 – 9/30 8/1 – 9/30 November 10/1 - 10/31 9/15 – 10/31 9/1 – 10/31 December 11/1 – 11/30 10/15 – 11/30 10/1 – 11/30 Cardholder Calendar The following chart outlines the planned dates for ‘Purchase Cardholder Suspensions’ and dates for when the suspensions will be lifted from the accounts (Lift Dates) for 2011: Purchase Cardholder Suspensions (Note: Suspensions occur once a month) Suspension Lift Dates (Note: Lifts on ‘suspended’ Cardholder accounts occur twice a month) July 5, 2011 July 5th and 15th, 2011 August 1, 2011 August 1st and 16th, 2011 September 1, 2011 September 1st and 16th, 2011 October 3, 2011 October 3rd and 17th, 2011 November 1, 2011 November 1st and 16th, 2011 December 1, 2011 December 1st and 16th, 2011 Blocked MCC Codes Refer to the following link on the CCSC Website to view: Getting Started with Reporting in AXOL Step-by-Step To begin the process, log into AXOL at by following the instructions below:
shared leadership across several institutions sharing of resources including support for professional development a curriculum partnership with pupils from partner schools. Before the inspection When embarking on coordinated inspections, it is advisable that all lead inspectors liaise before initial contact is made with a school so that clear and consistent messages are given to teachers. Where appropriate, lead inspectors may decide that it would be helpful for one of them to play a coordinating role, but this is not a requirement. Annex 2 provides some issues that lead inspectors may wish to consider together before the start of a coordinated inspection. In the case of coordinated inspections, it is important that the lead inspectors discuss with each prior to initial contact with the respective schools, how the initial contact should be handled. Each school should be contacted separately by the responsible lead inspector and, where possible, at the same time. Where the schools are led by an executive headteacher, lead inspectors may need to prepare – following the initial phone calls – for one lead inspector to coordinate the arrangements with the executive headteacher for meetings with senior staff and governors. In the initial phone call, inspectors should take the opportunity to clarify the details of partnership arrangements and whether other schools in the federation have already been inspected. Lead inspectors will confirm whether any other school in a federation has already been inspected. There may be judgements already made about a federation in a previous inspection report which will be pertinent to the pending inspections. Lead inspectors will read the reports from the other school(s) in order to prepare for discussions with senior leaders and governors. The initial conversation with the headteacher Careful thought needs to be given as to how communications will be managed. For example, a hard federation may have an executive teacher with a senior member of staff responsible for each institution. This will be determined by the federation’s leadership structure and working arrangements. The lead inspectors may need to discuss and plan how communication will be managed between: themselves as lead inspectors on each site the executive and senior staff/governors with responsibility for each site. During the initial conversation with headteachers it is important that they are made aware that there will be an individual report for each school with a separate URN.
Earnings based on: Note: Earnings definition may or may not always match the Minimum Hours Requirement on Page 1 regarding Scheduled or Actual. Enter based on Earnings Definition. Choices: - Scheduled - Actual Hours Worked Earnings Determination (determination date must be the same as the EARNINGS CHANGE) "The Day" for the "Earnings Determination". This means that the employee's benefit will be determined by his/her wages on the day just before the date of the loss. Choices: the date of the month following Policy Anniversary Date Specific MM/DD Other (provide details) Premium Grace Period Enter the Premium Grace Period: - 60 days (Default) Default: 60 days EOI Approval Effective Date (if applicable) Required to match the Individual Effective Date on the plan. There are to be "No" variations. Waiver of Premium Provide all of the following: Elimination = 9 or 6 Months Eligibility= Disability Occurred Under Age 60 Waiver of Premium Duration = Age 65 or 70 Benefit Coverage Amount Times Salary or Flat Benefit? List by Class, if different Rounding Rule Are benefit amounts rounded? Choices: - up or down to nearest $100, $1000, etc.? Reminder: When figuring coverage amount and rates, multiply salary before or after rounding? RSL Standard: Multiply before rounding Maximum Benefit Maximum Benefit Amount. List by if different Minimum Benefit Minimum Benefit Amount, if applicable. List by Class, if different
Enrollment Rules To be confirmed based on sold case plan details, and individual client enrollment rules. Choice of enrollments: Annual Re-enrollment Effective Date of Class Change What is the effective date if EE moves to another eligible class? Choices: the date first of month following first of month coinciding with or next following Specific MM/DD Policy Anniversary Date Other (provide details) Effective Date of Coverage Changes due to EARNINGS CHANGE ( Increase / Decrease in Salary) (if applicable) What is the date any increase or decrease in coverage becomes effective. Choices: the date first of month following first of month coinciding with or next following Specific MM/DD Policy Anniversary Date Other (provide details) Effective Date of Premium Changes due to change in Age What is the date the change in premium occurs, moving from one age band to another? Choices: the date first of month following first of month coinciding with or next following Specific MM/DD Policy Anniversary Date Other (provide details) Plan Type Description What is the plan type, ASO LTD or Fully Insured?
Worksite Modification Benefit RSL standard: 100% to $2,000 If than the standard, provide details. Extended Disability Benefit If an insured has reached the maximum duration of benefits, the Extended Disability Benefit will provide benefits for an additional period (60 months) provided that the insured meets all requirements for the benefit. Indicate whether this benefit is included. (Yes/No) Definition of Disability Note: Fully Insured LTD must be “Own Occ”. Indicate whether an insured must be disabled from "Own Occ" or "Own Job". SS Qualifier Note: Applies to ASO Only Does the client's plan require SS acceptance in order to pay benefits? Governance Note: Applies to ASO Only Indicate whether the plan qualifies as ERISA or Work Incentive Benefit If the policyholder offers a Work Incentive Benefit as part of their Rehabilitation plan, provide details of the benefit structure. An example of a standard plan is: During the first 12 months of Rehabilitative Employment during which a Monthly Benefit is payable, we will not offset earnings from Rehabilitative Employment until the sum of: (1) the Monthly Benefit prior to offsets with Other Income Benefits; and (2) earnings from Rehabilitative Employment; exceed 100% of the Insured's Covered Monthly Earnings. Child Care Credit RSL Standard: $250 per month until the child reaches 14 years of age ADL Benefit If there is an additional, payable benefit if an insured cannot perform two or more activities of daily living. (Yes/No) ADL Maximum Benefit Amount Indicate the ADL Maximum Benefit. ADL Percent Indicate the ADL Benefit Percent. ADL Pre-Ex Indicate the Pre-Existing Condition Limit. Example: 3/12, 6/12 or NONE.
2017-2018 CoP on SBBH / PaPBS SLT Meeting Participants: PBIS State Leadership Team URL: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/496459805 Dial +1 (571) 317-3112 Meeting ID: 496-459-805 Time Approximate Lead(s) / Activity Notes 1:30 – 1:40 Greetings & Introductions Jim 1:40 – 1:50 Updates: Strategy #1: PBIS Strategy #2: Safe Schools – Healthy Students Updates: Strategy #3: YMHFA 1:50 – 2:15 Agency Rounders: All 2:15 – 3:30 Endorsement in Social, Emotional and Behavioral Wellness for PK-12 Students (ad hoc work session) Competency 5 Confidentiality Diverse Learners needs (e.g. LGBTQ, students /w Distabilities) Equity (re: Culturally Responsive Langauge) Future CoP on SBBH Meeting Dates (17-18) November 16, 2017: 9:30 to 3:30 – Face to Face: PaTTAN Harrisburg January 12, 2018: 1:30 to 3:30 – GoTo Meeting February 7, 2018: 9:30 to 3:30 - Face to Face: PaTTAN Harrisburg March 9, 2018, 1:30 to 3:30 – GoTo Meeting April 25, 2018: 9:30 to 3:30 - Face to Face: PaTTAN Harrisburg June 8, 2018; 1:30 to 3:30 – GoTo Meeting
Community of Practice on Autism Spectrum Disorder and other Developmental Disabilities Interpersonal Safety Law Enforcement If you have any trouble with this registration or do not have access to a computer to register—please call Tim Markle at (608) 261-6879 or email him at .
Who needs to know? All UK Power Networks Staff Asset Management Capital Programme Connections Contractors Customer Services Finance Legal G81 External website HR & Communications HSS&TT In Business HSS Safety Reps ICPs (Independent Connection Providers) IDNOs (Independent Distribution Network Operators) Information Systems Meter Operators Network Operations EPN LPN SPN Distribution Capital Delivery Logistics Network Control Network Operations Connections Transport Services Strategy and Regulation UK Power Networks Services Airports Rail HS1, DLR & Commercial buildings MUJV / Allenby Business Development Others (specify) Contents Introduction and Purpose This procedure sets out the responsibilities and processes for updating Power On and DINIS operational diagrams used within Network Operations. Due to the close association of asset information held in the UK Power Networks Asset Register Ellipse, reference is also made to the processes that relate to the update of asset information in Ellipse.
Revision Record Version number 3.0 What has changed? Change of document owner and authorisers. Appendix 1 removed as now separate form COP 01 030a. Section 4 references updated. Why has it changed? Annual review Date published 04/12/2018 Next review date 02/10/2021 Prepared by Jackie Arnold Version number 2.0 What has changed? Appendix 1 reinstated. Change to charge in Section 8.2 Why has it changed? Annual review Date published 04/12/2014 Next review date 06/10/2016 Prepared by Richard Bishop Version number 1.1 What has changed? Removed appendix 1 from the last page of this document and now as separate form COP 01 030a. Why has it changed? Form removed from document Date published 24/04/2014 Next review date 06/10/2014 Prepared by Richard Bishop Circulation All UK Power Networks Staff Asset Management Capital Programme & Procurement Connections Contractors Customer Services Finance G81 External website HR & Communications ICPs (Independent Connection Providers) IDNOs (Independent Distribution Network Operators) Information Systems Legal Meter Operators SHE&TTA In Business safety team Safety Reps Network Operations EPN LPN SPN Connection Services Distribution Capital Delivery Highway Services Logistics Network Control Powercare Transport Services Strategy and Regulation UK Power Networks Services Airports Rail Strategic projects HS1, DLR & Commercial buildings MUJV / Allenby Business Development Others (specify)
something that Coordinated Entry Homeless Service Centers could take responsibility for updating on an ongoing basis? Next Steps: Workgroup Members review and send any changes to the Inventory Template to Sarah by 7/1 Sarah will update and send to local CoCs to use Implementing Coordinated Entry – Benchmarks Group - Elizabeth E, Brooke B, others? This group will outline some steps that local CoCs will take to implement coordinated entry – this can help us answer “how will we know that we are implementing CE? E.g. MOU, etc. Sarah will convene in July Key Next Measuring CE results: Small Group to propose some basic measures Need sooner than later so that we can identify the baseline Renee Weeks, Ashley Bride, Aliceanne L Sarah will convene in July New HMIS Lead – Learning from their experience Yes? Yes! Jennifer Allen (ICA) will work with Sarah to get this on the next meeting’s agenda Implementing Coordinated Entry – Benchmarks – See above NOTE – is an overview of HMIS with ICA – basic skills, chance to raise questions NEXT Thursday web training will forward newsletter (sign up yourself with the link at the bottom) NEXT MEETING – NOTE CHANGE IN TIME, DATE & Tuesday, July 21st in Randolph, 12:30 – 3pm (following VCEH)
Vermont Coalition to End Homelessness - Coordinated Workgroup Monday, August 24, 10:30 – Noon Agenda 10:30 Welcome & Review Agenda 10:40 Introductions & Updates Sarah, OEO; Sarah, HPC in Rutland; Erin McSweeney, ESD; Jessica, COTS; Aliceanne, UVM Veterans Services; Brian Smith, DMH; Jennifer Allen, ICA – HMIS; Christine Johnson, AHS Field Services; Kristin Prior, AHS Field Services; dawn Butterfield, Capstone; Lucie, Groundworks; Lily Sojourner, AHS Integrated Services; Elizabeth Eddy, BROC; Brooke Salls, Good Samaritan Haven Rutland County HPC has started the Coordinate Entry Tools; started training local partners on using the screening form; local committee (was bi-weekly, now monthly); drafted MOU – clarify roles Washington County Using screening form – passed around at local CoC meeting; Capstone has structured staffing to have one intake person; making some tweaks with the assessment form; drafting MOU. 10:55 Review Updated Model In this model, homeless Veterans are referred to the Lead Agency, VA & UVM Veterans Services could be housing assessment partners – can we look closely at this? Shelter + Care – not from this model The referral process – needs more clarity ICA – HMIS – there are ways that ServicePoint could be used as a tool for waitlist management Will present at October Meeting Generally, liked the new language and thought we were creating more clarity in our model – “clearinghouse” needs more definition, but it’s generally a good term 11:05 Review Work of Benchmarks Group Clarify and Make Concrete – See revised list Set a target on the % of organizations participating in the CE Partnership Need to solidify a local workgroup that takes responsibility for CE Partnership, not just the lead 11:25 Review Work of Results/Evaluation Group Need to be sure to include local organizations and groups that are not central to the CE partnership in the evaluation of how its working 11:45 Next Steps –
United Nations Environment Programme UNEP/OzL.Conv.11/CRP.2/Rev.1 22 November 2017 Original: English Conference of the Parties to the Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer Eleventh meeting Montreal, Canada, 20–24 November 2017 Item 5 (b) of the agenda for the preparatory segment Vienna Convention issues: status of the General Trust Fund for Financing Activities on Research and Systematic Observations Relevant to the Vienna Convention General Trust Fund for Financing Activities on Research and Systematic Observations Relevant to the Vienna Convention Submission by the Bureau of the tenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer (Australia, Bangladesh, Guatemala and Kazakhstan) and Belarus, Dominican Republic and Rwanda The Conference of the Parties decides: Recalling decision VI/2, by which the Conference of the Parties established the General Trust Fund for Financing Activities on Research and Systematic Observations Relevant to the Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer, and noting that the current life of the Trust Fund will expire at the end of 2019, Noting with appreciation the contributions to the Trust Fund by several parties and the joint efforts of the World Meteorological Organization and the Ozone Secretariat in the implementation of the activities funded from the Trust Fund since it became operational in 2003, Noting that important activities, including calibrations, inter-comparisons and relevant training, have been implemented successfully under the Trust Fund to date, Noting with great concern, however, that the resources available in the Trust Fund are not sufficient to enable substantial and sustainable improvements to be made to the global ozone observing system, Noting that the coming decade remains a crucial time during which the status of the recovery of the ozone layer will become clearer, but that such clarity will be dependent on continued highquality observations, Aware that improvements in ozone observations should take into account the existing strong and intricate linkages between ozone and climate and of the need to carry out relevant observations and analyses for both ozone and climate wherever possible, Noting with appreciation the work of the Advisory Committee of the Trust Fund, including on the long-term strategy and short-term plan of action for the Trust Fund prepared for consideration by the Conference of the Parties pursuant to decision X/3, 1. To request the Executive Director of the United Nations Environment Programme to extend the life of the General Trust Fund for Financing Activities on Research and Systematic Observations Relevant to the Vienna Convention until 31 December 2026;
Notes the recommendations emanating from the fifteenth and sixteenth sessions of the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, and requests the Secretariat to continue to inform the Permanent Forum on developments of mutual interest. 1. Background The meeting of the Ad Hoc Open-ended Inter-Sessional Working Group on Article 8(j) and Related Provisions of the Convention on Biological Diversity was held in Montreal, Canada, at the Palais des Congrès, from 13 to 16 December 2017, concurrently with the twenty-first meeting of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice. 2. Attendance The meeting was attended by representatives of the following Parties and other Governments: Angola Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Australia Austria Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Benin Bhutan Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Central African Republic Chad China Colombia Comoros Costa Rica Cuba Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Estonia Ethiopia European Union Finland France Gambia Germany Guatemala Guinea-Bissau Haiti Honduras India Indonesia Jamaica Japan Kiribati Lao People's Democratic Republic Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Mauritania Mexico Morocco Namibia Nepal Netherlands New Zealand Niger Norway Oman
Implementation Plan Anticipated Outcomes (See Appendix A) Activities (e.g., events, resource development, meetings etc.) Anticipated Outputs (if applicable) Number and type of participants (if applicable) Anticipated Timeline Monitoring and Evaluation (Required: Surveys and interviews for teachers, parents, etc.) 2016/2017 Interim Report
Implementation Plan Anticipated Outcomes (See Appendix A) Activities (e.g., events, resource development, meetings etc.) Anticipated Outputs (if applicable) Number and type of participants (if applicable) Anticipated Timeline Monitoring and Evaluation (Required: Surveys and interviews for teachers, parents, etc.) 2016/2017 Interim Report
Implementation Plan Anticipated Outcomes (See Appendix A) Activities (e.g., events, resource development, meetings etc.) Anticipated Outputs (if applicable) Number and type of participants (if applicable) Anticipated Timeline Monitoring and Evaluation (Required: Surveys and interviews for teachers, parents, etc.) 2016/2017 Interim Report
Implementation Plan Anticipated Outcomes (See Appendix A) Activities (e.g., events, resource development, meetings etc.) Anticipated Outputs (if applicable) Number and type of participants (if applicable) Anticipated Timeline Monitoring and Evaluation (Required: Surveys and interviews for teachers, parents, etc.) 2016/2017 Interim Report
C.O.P NATIONAL CONFERENCE PROGRAM NATIONAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULE (31 AUGUST – 1 SEPTEMBER 2018) FRIDAY 09:00 – 10:30 ANDRIES VAN HEERDEN 10:30 – 11:00 TEA 11:00 – 12:30 WALTER PENZHORN 12:30 – 14:00 LUNCH WORKSHOPS WILL FOCUS ON THE MOUNTAINS OF GOVERNMENT AND BUSINESS Please refer to speaker’s bio and photograph! 14:00 - 15:30 BUSINESS SPEAKERS (TONY COOKSEY, DR. PEARL KUPE & BILL HOLLIS) 15:30 – 16:00 TEA 16:00 – 17:30 GOVERNMENT SPEAKERS (HENNING SCHIKORA, TAKU MHONYERA & OTHER) 17:30 – 18:30 DINNER 18:30 – 21:00 ANITA GIOVANNONI SATURDAY 09:00 – 10:30 WALTER PENZHORN 10:30 – 11:00 TEA 11:00 – 12:30 JANET BRANN- HOLLIS 12:30 – 14:00 LUNCH 14:00 – 17:00 WORSHIP, TEAM PROPHECY AND PERSONAL PROPHECY 17:00 – 18:00 DINNER 18:00 – 21:00 WIP EVENT – PAUL BEVAN THE END!!!
COP1000 Section 2292 Introduction to Computer Programming January 9, 2017 – March 3, 2017 View the which provides the most current version of fluid information, such as the academic calendar. WELCOME COP 1000 is the foundation course for all computer programming courses in the College of Computer & Information Technology. Best wishes for an enjoyable and productive learning experience! Name: Dawn Ellis Email: ellis.dawn@spcollege.edu Phone: 727-614-7025 Office Hours: Tuesday/Thursday 10:00 a.m. – 12:30 p.m. and 2:00 p.m. – 4:00 p.m. Office Location: ES213B, Clearwater Campus Instructor Web Page: Students should anticipate a response to email within two school days. Grading is normally complete within five school days. ACADEMIC DEPARTMENT DEAN Name: Dr. Sharon R. Setterlind Office Location: St Petersburg/Gibbs - TE 116C Office Number: 727-341-4724 Email: setterlind.sharon@spcollege.edu ACADEMIC CHAIR
08:30 – 09:45 Meeting of the Conference Committee (with Standing Committee 2015-2018 appointees as observers) 10:00 – 10:30 Special Presentation: Healthy wetlands for the sustainable future of our planet. Elizabeth Maruma Mrema, Director Division of Environmental Law and Conventions (DELC), United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) 10:30 – 13:00 Plenary Session of the draft Resolutions and Recommendations submitted by Contracting Parties and the Standing Committee (continued) 13:00 – 15:00 Lunch break 15:00 – 18:00 Plenary Session of the draft Resolutions and Recommendations submitted by Contracting Parties and the Standing Committee (continued) Saturday, 6 June 2015 08:00 – 18:00 Registration (continued) 08:30 – 09:45 Meeting of the Conference Committee with Standing Committee 2015-2018 appointees as observers 10:00 – 10:30 Special Presentation: International Water Governance: Nothing fishy about it. Sibylle Vermont, Deputy Head of Section Global Affairs, International Affairs Division Federal Office for the Environment, Switzerland 10:30 – 13:00 Plenary Session of the draft Resolutions and Recommendations submitted by Contracting Parties and the Standing Committee (continued) 13:00 – 15:00 Lunch break 15:00 – 18:00 Plenary Session of the draft Resolutions and Recommendations submitted by Contracting Parties and the Standing Committee (continued) 18:30 – 20:00 Preparatory meeting of the appointees to the incoming Standing Committee 2015-2018 Sunday, 7 June 2015 08:00 – 18:00 Registration (continued)
Reports to COP8, COP9, COP10, and COP11 with those provided to COP12 in order to assess progress during these 13 years, covering the periods of the Strategic Plans 2003-2008 and 2009-2015. Shading in the shows whether particular actions reported for COP12 were more (or less) widely addressed in the European region, compared to the global average, based on the percentages of Parties having answered positively. Strategy Indicator Affirmative European Parties at COP8 COP9 COP10 COP12 COP12 globally 13 progress 1.1 Party has a comprehensive national wetland inventory (1.1.1) 11 20 20 21 22 (65%) 47% little (since 2005) 1.3 Party has a national wetland policy in place (1.3.1) 15 18 17 24 24 (71%) 55% stagnating 1.7 Party has applied Ramsar guidance (1.7.1) n.a. 5 10 14 24 (71%) 71% significant 1.8 implemented wetland restoration programmes (1.8.2) 11 24 29 30 27 (79%) 70% regressing 2.1 Party uses the Strategic Framework for Ramsar Site designations (2.1.1) n.a. 15 18 15 10 (29%) 41% regressing 3.3 Development assistance agencies provided for wetlands (3.3.1) 15 12 11 14 9 (26%) 15% stagnating Annex 3 New European Ramsar Sites designated since COP11 Including new designations submitted between 15 July 2012 and 15 January 2015. The right-hand column lists the number of further Ramsar Site designations planned for the triennium 2016-2018. Country Number of new sites designated Area of new sites (ha) Announced new sites 2016-2018 (2.4.1) Albania 1 15,119 - Andorra 3 6,870 - Armenia - - - Austria 3 4,958 3 Azerbaijan - - 2 Belarus 6 212,980 5 Belgium - - -
answered positively. (Symbols: = Significant progress; = some progress; = regression) Strategy Indicator Affirmative countries Progress since COP11 Oceania COP8 Oceania COP10 Oceania COP11 Oceania COP11 1.1 Inventory and Assessment: country has a comprehensive national wetland inventory (1.1.1.) 0% 50% 20% 43% 1.3 Policy and legislation: National Wetland Policy (or equivalent instrument) in place (1.3.1) 67% 50% 60% 51% 1.8 Wetland restoration and rehabilitation: wetland restoration/ rehabilitation programmes or projects implemented (1.8.2) 0% 50% 80% 69% 2.1 Ramsar Site designation: strategy and priorities established for further designation of Ramsar sites, using the Strategic Framework (2.1.1) 67% 25% 20% 42% 2.6 Condition of all Ramsar Sites: all cases of change or likely change in the ecological character of Ramsar sites been reported to the Ramsar Secretariat (Article 3.2) (2.6.1) 67% 50% 60% 62% 3.1 Collaboration: mechanisms in place at the national level for collaboration between the Ramsar AA and the focal points of other MEAs (3.1.1) 33% 100% 100% 66% 3.4 Sharing expertise and experience: networks established for knowledge sharing and training (3.4.1) 67% 75% 60% 39% 4.1 National Wetland Committee National Ramsar/ Wetlands Committee (or equivalent body) operational (4.1.6) 100% 25% 60% 54% Annex 3 Oceania Ramsar Sites designated since COP11 Country Number of sites Total area of sites (ha) Australia 1 862 Kiribati 1 1,033 TOTAL 2 1,895
REPUBLIC OF Saudi Arabia Singapore SRI SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC TAJIKISTAN THAILAND TURKMENISTAN UNITED ARAB EMIRATES UZBEKISTAN VIETNAM YEMEN OCEANIA AUSTRALIA Cook Islands FIJI KIRIBATI MARSHALL ISLANDS Micronesia (Federated States of) Nauru NEW ZEALAND Niue PALAU PAPUA NEW GUINEA SAMOA Solomon Islands Timor-Leste Tonga Tuvalu Vanuatu EUROPE ALBANIA Andorra ARMENIA AUSTRIA AZERBAIJAN BELARUS BELGIUM BOSNIA & HERZEGOVINA BULGARIA CROATIA CYPRUS CZECH REPUBLIC DENMARK ESTONIA FINLAND FRANCE GEORGIA GERMANY GREECE Holy See HUNGARY ICELAND IRELAND ISRAEL ITALY LATVIA LIECHTENSTEIN LITHUANIA LUXEMBOURG MOLDOVA, Republic of MONACO MONTENEGRO NETHERLANDS NORWAY POLAND PORTUGAL ROMANIA RUSSIAN FEDERATION San Marino SERBIA SLOVAK REPUBLIC SLOVENIA SPAIN SWEDEN SWITZERLAND THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA TURKEY UKRAINE UNITED KINGDOM LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA ARGENTINA BAHAMAS BARBADOS BELIZE BOLIVIA BRAZIL COLOMBIA
No. of people involved in completing assessment Including: (tick boxes) PA manager  PA staff  Other PA agency  NGO  Local community  Donors  External experts  Other  Ramsar Site manager  Government representative  Please note if assessment was carried out in association with a particular project, on behalf of an organisation or donor.
Is there co-operation with adjacent land and water users? Process There is contact between managers and neighbouring official or corporate land and water users, but only some co-operation 2 There is regular contact between managers and neighbouring official or corporate land and water users, and substantial co-operation on management 3 23. Indigenous people Do indigenous and traditional peoples resident or regularly the Ramsar Site have input to management decisions? Process Indigenous and traditional peoples have no input into decisions relating to the management of the Ramsar Site 0 Indigenous and traditional peoples have some input into discussions relating to management but no direct role in management 1 Indigenous and traditional peoples directly contribute to some relevant decisions relating to management but their involvement could be improved 2 Indigenous and traditional peoples directly participate in all relevant decisions relating to management, e.g. co-management 3 24. Local communities Do local communities resident or near the Ramsar Site have input to management decisions? Process Local communities have no input into decisions relating to the management of the Ramsar Site 0 communities have some input into discussions relating to management but no direct role in management 1 Local communities directly contribute to some relevant decisions relating to management but their involvement could be improved 2 communities directly participate in all relevant decisions relating to management, e.g. co-management 3 Additional points Local communities/indigenous people 24 a. Impact on communities is open communication and trust between local and/or indigenous people, stakeholders and Ramsar Site managers +1 24b. Impact on communities Programmes to enhance community welfare, conserving Ramsar Site resources, are being implemented +1 24c. Impact on communities Local and/or indigenous people actively support the Ramsar Site +1 25. Economic benefit The Ramsar Site does not deliver any economic benefits to local communities 0
Annex 2 Allocation of Contracting Parties and non-Contracting Parties to the six Ramsar regional groups NOTE: Names of countries in capital and bold letters denote Contracting Parties to the Convention at the time of approval of this Resolution. AFRICA ALGERIA Angola BENIN BOTSWANA BURKINA FASO BURUNDI CAMEROON CABO VERDE CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC CHAD COMOROS CONGO CÔTE D’IVOIRE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO DJIBOUTI EGYPT EQUATORIAL GUINEA Eritrea Ethiopia GABON GAMBIA GUINEA GUINEA-BISSAU KENYA LESOTHO LIBERIA LIBYA MADAGASCAR MALAWI MALI MAURITANIA MAURITIUS MOROCCO MOZAMBIQUE NAMIBIA NIGER NIGERIA RWANDA SAO TOME AND PRINCIPE SENEGAL SEYCHELLES SIERRA LEONE Somalia SOUTH AFRICA SUDAN SOUTH SUDAN SWAZILAND TOGO TUNISIA UGANDA UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA ZAMBIA ZIMBABWE ASIA Afghanistan BAHRAIN BANGLADESH BHUTAN Brunei Darussalam CAMBODIA CHINA Democratic People’s Republic of Korea INDIA INDONESIA IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAQ JAPAN JORDAN KAZAKHSTAN Kuwait KYRGYZSTAN LAO, PEOPLE’S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC LEBANON MALAYSIA Maldives MONGOLIA MYANMAR NEPAL OMAN PAKISTAN PHILIPPINES Qatar
REPUBLIC OF KOREA Arabia Singapore SRI LANKA SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC TAJIKISTAN THAILAND TURKMENISTAN UNITED ARAB EMIRATES UZBEKISTAN VIETNAM YEMEN OCEANIA AUSTRALIA Cook Islands FIJI KIRIBATI MARSHALL ISLANDS Micronesia (Federated States of) NEW ZEALAND Niue PALAU NEW GUINEA SAMOA Solomon Islands Timor-Leste Tonga Tuvalu Vanuatu EUROPE ALBANIA Andorra ARMENIA AUSTRIA AZERBAIJAN BELARUS BELGIUM BOSNIA & HERZEGOVINA BULGARIA CROATIA CYPRUS CZECH REPUBLIC DENMARK ESTONIA FINLAND FRANCE GEORGIA GERMANY GREECE Holy See HUNGARY ICELAND IRELAND ISRAEL LATVIA LIECHTENSTEIN LITHUANIA LUXEMBOURG MALTA MOLDOVA, REPUBLIC OF MONACO MONTENEGRO NETHERLANDS NORWAY POLAND PORTUGAL ROMANIA RUSSIAN FEDERATION San Marino SERBIA SLOVAK REPUBLIC SLOVENIA SPAIN SWEDEN SWITZERLAND THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA TURKEY UKRAINE UNITED KINGDOM LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA ARGENTINA BAHAMAS BARBADOS BELIZE BOLIVIA BRAZIL
CHILE COLOMBIA COSTA RICA CUBA Dominica DOMINICAN REPUBLIC ECUADOR EL SALVADOR GRENADA GUATEMALA Guyana Haiti HONDURAS JAMAICA NICARAGUA PANAMA PARAGUAY PERU Saint Kitts and Nevis SAINT LUCIA Saint Vincent and the Grenadines SURINAME TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO URUGUAY VENEZUELA NORTH AMERICA CANADA MEXICO UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Annex 2 Allocation of Contracting Parties and non-party States to the six regional groups NOTE: Names of countries in capital and bold letters denote Contracting Parties to the Convention at the time of approval of this Resolution. AFRICA: ALGERIA Angola BENIN BOTSWANA BURKINA FASO BURUNDI CAMEROON CABO CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC CHAD COMOROS CONGO CÔTE D’IVOIRE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO DJIBOUTI EGYPT EQUATORIAL GUINEA Eritrea ESWATINI Ethiopia GABON GAMBIA, THE GHANA GUINEA GUINEA-BISSAU KENYA LESOTHO LIBERIA MADAGASCAR MALAWI MALI MAURITANIA MAURITIUS MOROCCO MOZAMBIQUE NAMIBIA NIGER NIGERIA RWANDA SAO TOME AND PRINCIPE SENEGAL SEYCHELLES SIERRA LEONE Somalia AFRICA STATE OF LIBYA SUDAN SUDAN TOGO TUNISIA UGANDA UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA ZAMBIA ZIMBABWE ASIA: Afghanistan BAHRAIN BANGLADESH BHUTAN Brunei Darussalam CAMBODIA CHINA DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF KOREA INDIA INDONESIA IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAQ JORDAN KAZAKHSTAN KUWAIT KYRGYZSTAN LAO PEOPLE’S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC LEBANON MALAYSIA Maldives MONGOLIA MYANMAR NEPAL OMAN PAKISTAN PHILIPPINES
REPUBLIC OF Arabia Singapore SRI LANKA SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC TAJIKISTAN THAILAND TURKMENISTAN UNITED ARAB EMIRATES UZBEKISTAN VIET NAM YEMEN EUROPE: ALBANIA Andorra ARMENIA AUSTRIA AZERBAIJAN BELARUS BELGIUM BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA BULGARIA CROATIA CYPRUS CZECH REPUBLIC DENMARK ESTONIA FINLAND FRANCE GEORGIA GERMANY GREECE Holy See HUNGARY ICELAND IRELAND ISRAEL ITALY LATVIA LIECHTENSTEIN LITHUANIA LUXEMBOURG MALTA MONACO MONTENEGRO NETHERLANDS NORWAY POLAND PORTUGAL REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA ROMANIA RUSSIAN FEDERATION San Marino SERBIA SLOVAK REPUBLIC SLOVENIA SPAIN SWEDEN SWITZERLAND THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA TURKEY UKRAINE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN: ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA ARGENTINA BAHAMAS BARBADOS BELIZE BOLIVIA (PLURINATIONAL STATE OF) BRAZIL COLOMBIA COSTA RICA CUBA Dominica DOMINICAN REPUBLIC ECUADOR EL SALVADOR GRENADA GUATEMALA Guyana Haiti HONDURAS JAMAICA NICARAGUA
Annex 2 Allocation of Contracting Parties and States to the six regional groups NOTE: Names of countries in capital and bold letters denote Contracting Parties to the Convention at the time of approval of this Resolution. AFRICA: ALGERIA Angola BENIN BOTSWANA BURKINA FASO BURUNDI CAMEROON CABO VERDE CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC CHAD COMOROS CONGO CÔTE D’IVOIRE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO DJIBOUTI EGYPT EQUATORIAL GUINEA Eritrea ESWATINI Ethiopia GABON GAMBIA, THE GHANA GUINEA GUINEA-BISSAU KENYA LESOTHO LIBERIA MADAGASCAR MALAWI MALI MAURITANIA MAURITIUS MOROCCO MOZAMBIQUE NAMIBIA NIGER NIGERIA RWANDA SAO TOME AND PRINCIPE SENEGAL SEYCHELLES SIERRA LEONE Somalia SOUTH AFRICA OF LIBYA SOUTH SUDAN TOGO TUNISIA UGANDA UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA ZAMBIA ZIMBABWE ASIA: Afghanistan BAHRAIN BANGLADESH BHUTAN Brunei Darussalam CAMBODIA CHINA DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF KOREA INDONESIA IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAQ JORDAN KAZAKHSTAN KUWAIT KYRGYZSTAN LAO PEOPLE’S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC LEBANON MALAYSIA Maldives MONGOLIA MYANMAR NEPAL OMAN PAKISTAN
NICARAGUA PANAMA PARAGUAY PERU Saint Kitts and Nevis SAINT LUCIA Saint Vincent and the Grenadines SURINAME TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO URUGUAY VENEZUELA (BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF) NORTH AMERICA: CANADA MEXICO UNITED STATES OF AMERICA OCEANIA: AUSTRALIA Cook Islands FIJI KIRIBATI MARSHALL ISLANDS Micronesia (Federated States of) Nauru NEW ZEALAND Niue PALAU PAPUA NEW GUINEA SAMOA Solomon Islands Timor Leste Tonga Tuvalu Vanuatu
13th Meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties to the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands “Wetlands for a Sustainable Urban Future” Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 21-29 October 2018 Ramsar Doc.3.1 Provisional agenda Agenda item Document 1. Opening of the Meeting no document 2. General statements and keynote addresses no document Procedural matters 3. 3.1 Adoption of the provisional agenda (Annotated provisional agenda) COP13 Doc.3.1 (COP13 Doc.3.1 bis) 3.2 Provisional working programme COP13 Doc.3.2 4. 4.1 Adoption of the of procedure COP13 Doc.4.1 4.2 Proposed amendments to the rules of procedure COP13 Doc.4.2 5. Election of the President and Vice-Presidents and remarks by the President no document 6. Appointment of the Credentials Committee and any other committees no document 7. Admission of observers COP13 Doc.7 Administrative matters 8. Report of the Chair of the Standing Committee Doc.8 9. Report of the Chair of the Scientific and Technical Review Panel (STRP) COP13 Doc.9 10. Report on implementation of the CEPA Programme 2016-2018 COP13 Doc.10 11. Report of the Secretary General on the implementation of the Convention COP13 Doc.11 12. Report of the Secretary General pursuant to Article 8.2 on the List of Wetlands of International Importance Doc.12 13. Issues arising from Resolutions and Recommendations of previous meetings of the Conference of the Contracting Parties no document 14. Report on financial and budgetary matters COP13 Doc.14 15. Review of the Wetland City Accreditation COP13 Doc.15 16. Election of Contracting Parties to the Standing Committee 2019-2021 no document Draft resolutions
18.19 Draft resolution on the importance of wetlands for peace and security COP13 Doc.18.19 18.20 Draft resolution on gender and wetlands COP13 Doc.18.20 18.21 resolution on agriculture in wetlands COP13 Doc.18.21 18.22 Draft resolution on promoting the conservation and wise use of intertidal wetlands and ecologically associated habitats COP13 Doc.18.22 18.23 Draft resolution on conservation and management of small wetlands COP13 Doc.18.23 18.24 Draft resolution on wetlands in West Asia Doc.18.24 18.25 Draft resolution on wetlands in polar and subpolar regions COP13 Doc.18.25 18.26 Draft resolution on the enhanced conservation of sea turtle breeding, feeding and nursery areas and the designation of key areas as Ramsar Sites COP13 Doc.18.26 Procedural matters 19. Report of the Credentials Committee COP13 Doc.19 Draft resolutions 20. Report on the discussions, conclusions and recommendations in the preceding sessions no document 21. Adoption of resolutions and recommendations Procedural matters 22. Date and venue of the next ordinary meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties no document 23. Any other business 24. Adoption of the report of the 13th Meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties 25. of the meeting
13th Meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties to the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands “Wetlands for a Sustainable Urban Future” Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 21-29 October 2018 Ramsar COP13 Doc.3.2 Rev.1 Provisional working programme Sunday 21 October 2018 08:30 – 12:30, 14:00 – 18:00 Registration of delegates (continues each day to 29 October) 10:00 – 13:00 55th Meeting of the Standing Committee 14:00 – 18:00 Regional meetings (including discussions on Contracting Parties to be proposed for election to the Standing Committee, under agenda item 16) 18:15-21:00 Meetings of Regional Initiatives Monday 22 October 2018 08:30 – 12:30, 14:00 – 18:00 Registration (continued) 09:00 – 12:00 Regional meetings 12:00 – 13:30 Special event “UN Ocean Conference Community of Ocean Action on Mangroves: Progress and opportunities” 14:00 – 16:00 Regional meetings 17:00 – 19:00 Opening ceremony and welcoming statements 1. Opening of the Meeting 2. General statements and keynote addresses Ramsar Awards ceremony 19:00 – 21:30 Welcome reception
Indigenous and local knowledge Use local knowledge of how the site functions and how local communities interact with it. Discussions Ensure that the assessors discuss issues between themselves and make reasoned conclusions. Stakeholder engagement Wherever possible engage with local stakeholders to understand better the relationship between people and the wetland. Think about a hierarchy of stakeholders, from local (living/working in an immediately around the wetland), regional (those downstream and upstream of the wetland or in the wider region) and global (stakeholders and beneficiaries beyond national boundaries).