Does not meet Expectations. Evidence- problematic classroom or other teaching performance; unreliable advising and/or mentoring, and frequent unavailability; indifference toward or unreasonable resistance to meeting teaching standards. Area(s) of deficiency: Meets expectations Evidence – in the classroom and alignment of learning outcomes; reliable student academic advising and/or mentoring: Fulfills all teaching responsibilities of effective teaching: Course Materials: Learning Outcomes: Advising/Mentoring: Exceeds expectations Evidence of excellence (beyond meeting expectations): Developed significant new course materials: Developed new assessment tools: Developed new curricula/programs: Exceptional Evidence of extraordinary impact (beyond excellence and meeting expectations): Prestigious recognition (award, invited conference speaker, etc.): Developed recurring teaching workshop: Developed curricular activities: Strengths/Weaknesses of Achievements, and Recommendations** Strengths/Weaknesses of Achievements - Faculty Response** RESEARCH/SCHOLARLY/CREATIVE PRODUCTIVITY (relative to rank, position, and workload expectations) Does not meet Expectations Evidence: scholarly or creative activity of a quantity or quality expectations given rank and position. Area(s) of deficiency: Meets expectations Evidence: Publications in peer- reviewed/primary journals: Publications in secondary journals: Exceeds expectations Evidence of excellence: Publications (quality and quantity): Research Funding (competitive): Exceptional Evidence of extraordinary impact: publication as senior/ corresponding author:
Research funding: Scholarly conference presentations: Areas of scholarly impact: - economic - social - environmental -teaching/learning Research program planning for success: Scholarly conferences Scholarly impact(s) Research team building for institutional success: Prestigious recognition fellow, keynote presentations, etc.): Developed a major that generated significant recognition/ income for the university from a national/ international agency/ foundation: Strengths/Weaknesses of Achievements, and Recommendations** Strengths/Weaknesses of Achievements – Faculty Response** EXTENSION/OUTREACH (relative to rank, position, and workload expectations)
Does not meet Expectations Evidence: problematic or ineffective performance with stakeholders and/or educators; frequently unavailability; indifference toward or unreasonable resistance to meeting Extension standards. Area(s) of deficiency: Meets expectations Evidence: Fulfills extension responsibilities effectively. Stakeholder interactions: Stakeholder conference/ meeting presentations: Extension/outreach publications: Extension/outreach funding: Active participation on Extension/outreach team: Extension/outreach planning for program success: Exceeds expectations Evidence of excellence: National stakeholder interactions: National stakeholder presentations: Extension/outreach funding: Extension/outreach team building for institutional success: Exceptional Evidence of extraordinary impact: Prestigious recognition (award, fellow, keynote presentation, etc.) Development of initiatives for Extension/outreach: Impact on policy, legislation, practice, etc.: Strengths/Weaknesses of Achievements, and Recommendations** Strengths/Weaknesses of Achievements, and Recommendations – Faculty Response** **Insert separate page as needed LEADERSHIP/SERVICE (relative to rank, position, and workload expectations)
Does not meet Expectations Evidence: little or no meaningful or useful activity in serving department, college, university or professional organizations in important ways. Or behavior of professionally unacceptable kind or harmful effect. Area(s) of deficiency: expectations Evidence: effective service at multiple organizational and professional levels appropriate to rank and seniority. Professional behavior: Department service: College service: University service: Professional organization service: Exceeds expectations Evidence of areas of excellence and initiative: College/campus committee leadership: Professional organization leadership: Research, Teaching, or Extension/Outreach program leadership: Exceptional Evidence of extraordinary impact: Prestigious recognition (award, elected office, in professional society, etc.): Generosity of spirit in volunteering: Invited service on national program review: Strengths/Weaknesses of Achievements, and Recommendations** Strengths/Weaknesses of Achievements, and Recommendations – Faculty Response** **Insert separate page as needed