Practice Code Practice Name Worthing H82009 ST.LAWRENCE SURGERY H82011 STRAND MEDICAL GROUP H82015 PHOENIX MEDICAL GROUP H82034 LIME TREE SURGERY H82041 VICTORIA ROAD SURGERY H82045 WORTHING MEDICAL GROUP H82046 BROADWATER MEDICAL CENTRE H82061 SELDEN MEDICAL CENTRE H82076 CORNERWAYS SURGERY H82086 HIGHDOWN SURGERY H82087 BARN SURGERY H82101 HEENE ROAD SURGERY H82643 THE MAYFLOWER SURGERY Adur and Worthing GPs Practice Code Practice Name Adur H82002 THE LYONS PRACTICE H82023 ADUR MEDICAL GROUP H82029 THE MANOR PRACTICE H82065 BALL TREE SURGERY H82083 NORTHBOURNE MEDICAL CENTRE H82091 NEW POND ROW SURGERY H82094 KINGFISHER FAMILY PRACTICE H82096 ORCHARD SURGERY H82625 OLD SHOREHAM ROAD SURGERY Arun and Regis GPs Practice Code Practice Name Arun H82007 WESTCOURT MEDICAL CENTRE H82014 COPPICE SURGERY H82039 PARK SURGERY H82059 WILLOW SURGERY H82066 FITZALAN MEDICAL
GP registered Population of Coastal West Sussex Resident Population of Coastal West Sussex Age Group Number % of Population Number % of Population 0-4 25,200 5.1% 25,500 5.3% 5-14 49,400 10.1% 49,100 10.2% 15-24 53,300 10.9% 50,600 10.5% 25-44 111,100 22.6% 108,800 22.7% 45-64 132,000 26.9% 130,800 27.3% 65-74 61,000 12.4% 56,500 11.8% 75-85 39,900 8.1% 39,800 8.3% 85+ 19,000 3.9% 18,900 3.9% Total 490,900 480,000 Coastal CCG Projections Current population projections for Coastal West Sussex, are estimating an overall population increase of 10% over the next ten years, but with higher percentage increases in 65-84 years olds and 85+ year olds. Population 2011 (MYE) and 2021 Projected Figures rounded to the nearest 100. Age Group 2011 (MYE) 2021 Projection % Change 0-15 79,900 90,300 13.0% 16-64 284,960 297,930 4.6% 65-84 96,270 117,980 22.6% 85+ 18,920 24,180 27.8% Overall 480,050 530,390 10.5% Projected % Change 2011 to 2021 – COASTAL WEST SUSSEX CCG
This graphs shows the number of births by postcode (within the CCG area) and are based on date of death. Using pooled data mean that these graphs are not easily comparable. Note : There are a small number of missing / unknown causes. Deprivation - Information from the Indices of Deprivation 2010 (ID2010) The Indices of Deprivation measures relative levels of deprivation in small areas, (Lower Super Output Areas (LSOAs) contain approx. 1,500 people). The latest available indices were published in 2010 and in the main relate to data collated in 2008. The Indices are published by the Department for Communities and Local Government every 3-4 years and are widely used, notably in funding allocations and targeting. ID2010 is made up of seven domain indices, although each domain is not given equal weighting; from these an overall ranking of small area deprivation is calculated. The seven domains are: Income Employment Health deprivation and Disability Education, skills and training Barriers to Housing, and Services Living Environment Crime Note : This is an area measure of deprivation; not all people living in a deprived area are deprived, equally there are deprived people living in less deprived areas. Summary of Use of ID2010 What can you use the indices for? What can’t the Indices of Deprivation 2010 be used for? Compare different in England (or within different geographies , South East, West Sussex etc) Identify the most deprived areas Look at differences between the domains of deprivation Calculate how many people are income or employment deprived (these are the only part of the index where numbers of people can be estimated) Look at deprivation across larger areas To show how deprived a place is Measuring absolute change over time – this is a relative measure of deprivation – so areas may become relatively more deprived when compared to others but may in absolute terms be better off over time Say how affluent a place is – this is a measure of deprivation not affluence – so it is possible to say which areas are the least deprived, this does not necessarily translate into the most affluent.
Identify deprived people – numbers only available from the income and employment domains Make comparisons with different countries ID2010 - OVERALL DEPRIVATION This maps shades LSOAs according to their relative deprivation ranking. The most deprived areas are shaded dark blue, and the least deprived shaded dark yellow. The darkest blue shading represents areas within the most deprived 10% in England. DEPRIVATION – ESTIMATES OF INDICES OF MULTIPLE DEPRIVATION 2010 FOR GP PRACTICES The graph below has shaded CCG practices by their national decile group (practices shaded dark blue are estimated to have the most deprived populations in England, dark orange the least deprived). ). In the CWS CCG 3 practices are estimated to have populations in the ID2010 3rd decile (Bognor, Fitzalan and Norfolk Square). Coastal West Sussex 10% Most Deprived LSOA Population 0 - 2nd decile group 0 - 3rd decile group 0 - 4th decile group 3 - 5th decile group 6 - 6th decile 11 - 7th decile group 8 - 8th decile group 16 - 9th decile 10 - 10% Deprived LSOA Population 3 Source : HSCIC. Note : The GP Practice IMD is estimated by taking a weighted average of the IMD scores for each LSOA (Lower Super Output Area) in which a given practice has registrations. The weights are the % of the practice's registrations in each LSOA.
Epilepsy - Emergency Admission – Rate per 1,000 QOF Registered Patients Heart Failure - Emergency Admission – Rate per 1,000 QOF Registered Patients Hypertension - Emergency Admission – Rate per 1,000 QOF Registered Patients Stroke - Emergency Admission – Rate per 1,000 QOF Registered Patients