Stakeholder Feedback and Grievance Redress Procedure (G3.8) Describe the steps taken to verify the project proponent has implemented the project’s feedback and grievance redress procedure. Include details of the status of any grievances raised in the implementation period, documents assess, and observations made during the site visit. Provide and justify an overall conclusion as to whether the grievance redress procedure has been implemented according to the project’s validated design. Worker Relations (G3.9 – G3.12) Describe the steps taken to verify the project proponent has taken actions and implemented measures to ensure that the relationship between the project and workers meet the requirements of G3.9 – G3.12. Include details of actions taken or measures implemented that: Build the capacity of the communities though job training and employment. Ensure people from the communities are given an equal opportunity to fill work positions. Ensure the project is in compliance with all relevant laws and regulations regarding worker’s rights and workers are informed of their rights. Inform workers of risks and how to minimize risk. Minimize workplace risk using best work practices. Include details of documentation assessed and observations made on the site visit. Provide and justify an overall conclusion as to whether the relationship between workers and the project upholds the intent and design presented in the validated project description. Management Capacity (G4.2 – G4.3) Describe the steps taken to verify the project proponent has taken actions and implemented measures to ensure the capacity exists to implement the project over the project lifetime. Include details of information provided or measures implemented that: Demonstrate the project possesses or is acquiring the key technical and management skills required to implement the project successfully. Demonstrate the financial health of the implementing organization is adequate to support project implementation, and in the case of grouped projects, the ability of the implementing organization(s) to provide adequate financial support to new project included in the project at this verification event. Provide assurance that the project is not complicit in any form of corruption. Include details of documentation assessed and observations made on the site visit. Provide and justify an overall conclusion as to whether the project has the capacity to implement the project in accordance with the validated project description.
Dissemination of Monitoring Plan and Results (CL4.2) Describe the steps taken to verify the actions taken to disseminate the results of climate monitoring in accordance with the monitoring plan. Include details of documentation assessed and observations made during the site visit. Provide and justify an overall conclusion as to whether the results of climate monitoring were disseminated in accordance with the validated project description. Optional Gold Level: Climate Change Adaptation Measures (GL1.3) If applicable, describe the steps taken to verify the actions taken to assist communities and/or biodiversity to adapt to the probable impacts of climate change. Include details as to how the activities implemented achieve the results indicated in the project’s causal model. Provide and justify an overall conclusion as to whether the activities implemented deliver the intended impacts. Optional Gold Level: Climate Change Adaptation Benefits (GL1.4) If applicable, describe the steps taken to verify the results of actions taken to assist communities and/or biodiversity to adapt to the probable impacts of climate change. Include details of documentation assessed, including the evaluations of the impacts by the affected communities, and observations made during the site visit. Provide and justify an overall conclusion as to whether the activities implemented assist communities and or biodiversity to adapt to the probable impacts of climate change. Community Community Impacts (CM2.1) Describe the taken to verify the reported impacts of project activities on each identified community group. Include details of documentation assessed, methods used to assess the quality of data provided and observations made during the site visit. Provide and justify an overall conclusion as to whether the assessment of impacts is accurate. Negative Community Impact Mitigation (CM2.2) Describe the steps taken to verify the actions taken to mitigate any negative well-being impacts on communities and for maintenance or enhancement of the high conservation values attributes. Include details of documentation assessed and observations made during the site visit. Provide and justify an overall conclusion as to whether the mitigation actions were implemented in accordance with the validated project description. Net Positive Community Well-being (CM2.3) Describe the steps taken to verify that the net the impacts of project activities on all identified community groups are positive. Include details of documentation assessed and observations made during the site visit. Provide and justify an overall conclusion as to whether the net impact of project activities on community groups is positive.