zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Laboratories 65 Community use Place of worship All indoor areas 50 Office Private offices Conference rooms 55 Open offices 65 Table 8.2.2.3.d — Land uses associated with increases in wildlife strikes and hazards Column 1 High Risk Column 2 Moderate Risk Aquaculture (fish processing/packing plant); Conservation estate (e.g. wetland); Cropping (turf farm, fruit tree farm); High-impact industry (food processing plant more than 200 tonnes per annum); Intensive animal industry (piggery); Low impact industry (food processing plant); sport, recreation and entertainment facility (showground); Medium-impact industry (food processing plant less than 200 tonnes per annum); Utility installation (Food / organic facility, Putrescible waste facility (e.g. landfill, transfer station). Animal husbandry (cattle/dairy farm); Conservation estate (all other); Intensive animal industry (poultry farm); Major sport, recreation and entertainment facility (all other); Outdoor sport and recreation; Park; Utility installation (Sewage/wastewater treatment facility, Non-putrescible waste facility e.g. landfill, transfer station).
avoided for the nominated design storm, and minimised when the it is exceeded by addressing design objectives listed in Table 9.4.3.3.b for: (a) drainage control; (b) erosion controls; (c) sediment control; (d) water quality outcomes. AO5.5 Erosion and sediment control practices are designed, installed, constructed, monitored, maintained, and carried out in accordance with the erosion and sediment control plan. AO5.6 Development incorporates stormwater flow control measures to achieve the design objectives set out in Table 9.4.3.3.b and Table 9.4.3.3.c, including management of frequent flows, peak flows, and construction phase hydrological impacts. Note – Planning scheme policy - FNQROC Regional Development Manual provides guidance on soil and control measures to meet the requirements of the Environmental Protection Act 1994. Note – During construction phases of development, contractors and builders are to have consideration in their work methods and site preparation for their environmental duty to protect stormwater quality. Non-tidal artificial waterways PO6 Development involving non-tidal artificial waterways is planned, designed, constructed and operated to: (a) protect environmental values; (b) be compatible with the land use constraints for the site for protecting water environmental values; (b) be compatible with existing tidal and non-tidal waterways; (c) perform a function in addition to stormwater management; AO6.1 Development involving non-tidal artificial waterways ensures: (a) environmental values in downstream waterways are protected; (b) any groundwater recharge areas are not affected; (c) the location of the waterway incorporates low lying areas of the catchment connected to an existing waterway;
Road access minimum clearances of 3.5 metres wide and 4.8 metres high are provided for safe passage of emergency vehicles. Alternations and repairs to public utility services PO13 Infrastructure is integrated with and efficiently extends existing networks. AO13.1 Development is designed to allow for efficient connection to existing infrastructure networks. PO14 Development and do not affect the efficient functioning of public utility mains, services or installations. AO14.1 Public utility mains, services and installations are not required to be altered or repaired as a result of the development; or AO14.2 Public utility mains, services and installations are altered or repaired in association with the works so that they continue to function and satisfy the relevant Design Guidelines set out in Section D8 of the Planning scheme policy – FNQROC Regional Development Manual. Construction management PO15 Work is undertaken in a manner which minimises adverse impacts on vegetation that is to be retained. AO15.1 Works include, at a minimum: (a) installation of protective fencing around retained vegetation during construction; (b) erection of advisory signage; (c) no disturbance, due to earthworks or storage of plant, materials and equipment, of ground level and soils below the canopy of any retained vegetation; (d) removal from the site of all declared noxious PO16 AO16.1
AO3.4 Street trees are species which enhance the landscape character of the streetscape, with species chosen from the Planning scheme policy – Landscaping. PO4 Plant species are selected with consideration to the scale and form of development, screening, buffering, streetscape, shading and the locality of the area. AO4.1 Species are selected in accordance with Planning scheme policy – Landscaping. PO5 Shade planting is provided in car parking areas where uncovered or open, and adjacent to driveways and internal roadways. AO5.1 Species are selected in accordance with Planning scheme policy – Landscaping. Maintenance and drainage PO6 Landscaped areas are designed in order to allow for efficient maintenance. AO6.1 A maintenance program is undertaken in accordance with Planning scheme policy – Landscaping. Podium planting PO7 Podium planting is provided with appropriate species for long term survival and ease of maintenance, with beds capable of proper drainage. AO7.1 Podium planting beds are provided with irrigation and are connected to stormwater infrastructure to permit flush out. AO7.2 Species of plants are selected for long term performance designed to suit the degree of access to podiums and roof tops for maintenance. Weeds and invasive species PO8 Development provides for the removal of all weed and invasive species and implement on-going measures to ensure that weeds and invasive AO8.1 Weed and invasive species detected on a development site are removed in accordance with a
species do not reinfest the site and nearby premises. management plan prepared by an appropriately qualified person. Safety PO9 The landscape design enhances personal safety and reduces the potential for and vandalism. Note – Planning scheme policy – Crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) provides guidance on meeting this outcome. AO9.1 No acceptable outcomes are provided. Utilities and services PO10 The location and type of species does not adversely affect the function and accessibility of services and facilities and service areas. AO10.1 Species are selected in accordance with Planning scheme policy – Landscaping.
DISTRICT AND SCHOOL INFORMATION Special Course Name: School District Name: School District Number: District Contact Name: Email: Contact Title: Phone: List the school(s) and school number(s) where this course will be offered for the 2018-19 school year: COURSE INFORMATION Type of Course Career and Technical Education Enrichment General Education Special Populations When will this special course be offered? Fall Semester Spring Semester Year-long Course Delivery Model: Will any portion of this course be delivered online? No Yes Blended If Online Delivery: Asynchronous Synchronous Proposed Level of Special Course: Introduction (Level 1) Intermediate (Level 2) Advanced (Level 3) Capstone 4) Note: The final determination of the level of the special course will be included in the letter of approval. Credit must be awarded in a specific area and cannot be requested simply as “elective credit.” Select the content area for credit would be awarded upon completion of this special course. English Language Arts Math Science Social Studies Fine Arts World Language Wellness & P.E. Special Populations Career and Technical Education Specify career cluster: ________________________ specify subject(s) included: ____________________ Special course standards are attached and include all appropriate references to Tennessee Academic Standards No Yes
Paul Blee inquired about “How do we go about getting the case to the review team?” It was suggested that they continue to work though their local LE as well as the DA to see if they are interested. FUTURE MEETINGS The next meeting will be held February 2, 2018 from 2:30 PM – 3:30 PM at 690 Kipling Street, Denver, CO 80215 in the first floor conference room.
Following Men’s Shot Put (3 Preliminary Attempts; Top 9 Advance to Finals) Running Events: 1:00 pm 3,000m run – Women 3,000m run – Men 60m dash – Women 60m dash – Men 60m hurdles – Women 60m hurdles – Men 1 Mile run – Women 1 Mile run – Men 400m dash – 400m dash - Men 600m run – Women 600m run – Men 300m dash – Women 300m dash – Men 800m run – Women 800m run – Men 4 x 400m relay – Women 4 x 400m relay – Men
Organization (Please use entity legal name) Organization Type Non-Profit Organization Education Institution Private Organization Other (Please Specify): Proposal Type – check all that apply This Project Only For Future Consideration COBID Certification, if applicable: OR Cert ID Minority, Women, or Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (MBE/WBE/DBE) Emerging Business or Service Disabled Veteran Business Enterprise (ESB/SDVBE) Contact Person for Proposal Phone Number Street Address Mailing Address (if different) Address (for all RFP correspondence) Fax Number I hereby declare that the information provided herein is accurate, and a full disclosure of requested information. I am fully authorized to represent the organization listed above, to act on behalf of it, and to legally bind it in all matters related to this application. Printed Name Title Signature Date Proposal Narrative Package Submission Instructions: each of the items submitted. For the Proposal Submission, prepare 6 complete packets with all documents in the order listed and clearly identified. Prepare 1 Administrative Capacity Response packet. Proposal Submission Item Reference Submission Electronic Submission: email Signed Submission Cover Page & Checklist (This Document) Resource Document on website 1 Original 5 Copies PDF Consortia Application (Optional) RFP Part VI Limit to 2 pages and Organization Chart 1 Original 5 Copies PDF Executive Summary RFP Part VI, Section A Limit to 1 page 1 Original 5 Copies PDF Proposal Narrative RFP Part VI, Sections B and C Limit to 10 pages 1 Original 5 Copies PDF Budget Narrative RFP Part VI, Section D Budget Narrative Resource Document on website 1 Original 5 Copies PDF or Excel Administrative Capacity Response RFP Part VI, Section D Limit to 3 pages 1 Original PDF Administrative Capacity Documents RFP Part VI, Section D 1 Original PDF
Task # - Task Name Total Amount Due $ - Task # - Task Name Salary Costs Personnel Classification Hours Raw Rate Current Invoice Total 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 Subtotal Raw Salary Costs This Task $ - Overhead 0.0% $ - Fee 0.0% $ - Total Direct Salary Costs This Task $ - Direct Non-Salary Costs Item Expense Category Current Invoice Total 1 Travel & Per Diem 2 Reproduction 3 Communication 4 Sampling & Testing 5 Sub-Consultants 6 Other Subtotal Direct Cost This Task $ - Task # - Task Name Total Amount Due $ - Total Amount Due This Invoice (Summary of All Tasks)
Caboolture Campus Student Assistance Scheme Application Form INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS ABOUT THE CABOOLTURE CAMPUS STUDENT ASSISTANCE SCHEME (CCSAS) The Caboolture Campus Student Assistance Scheme targets students from low-income backgrounds or students who face significant financial barriers to studying at university. Assistance is available to students able to demonstrate financial difficulties for the purposes listed below. Assistance provided will be dependent on available funding. WHO IS ELIGIBLE? All students experiencing financial difficulty who are enrolled in courses at the Caboolture Campus are eligible to apply. DUE DATES Applications close end of week 1 of each semester Graduation bursary closes end of week 12 of semester FURTHER INFORMATION For further information please contact the Student Engagement Officer Ph: 5316 7461 or IMPORTANT NOTE: All information and documentation supplied by you will be treated confidentially and in accordance with QUT's Privacy Policy. It will only be disclosed to QUT staff involved in the selection process. For more information on privacy at QUT, including QUT's privacy plan go to PERSONAL DETAILS Name Student No Mobile QUT Email Course Code Year Level (e.g. 1st or 2nd year student) Do you identify as an Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander Person (Yes / No) INDIVIDUAL & FAMILY FINANCIAL SITUATION Your Situation one of the following describes your current situation? Single - living at home and supported financially by family Complete Section 1 & 2 Single - living at home with parent/guardian and financially independent (i.e. share all expenses) Complete Section 1 & 2 Single - living away from home and supported financially by family Complete Section 1 & 2 Single - financially independent Complete Section 1 only Sole parent/Carer Complete Section 1 only Partnered, no dependants Complete Section 1 & 2 Partnered, with dependants Complete Section 1 & 2 Other (please specify) Number of dependants (under 18) that you support If you are supported by your parents(s)/caregiver(s) or partner, number of dependants that they support SECTION 1: Your Individual Financial Situation Abstudy Aged Pension
Section Page Table of Contents 2 Invitation for Proposal 3-4 Form of Proposal 5-6 Non-Collusion Affidavit 7 Purchase Agreement 8 Standard Conditions 9-10 Scope of the Proposal 11-17 INVITATION FOR PROPOSAL Portable CCTV Camera Pipeline Inspection System The Village of Saranac Lake (OWNER) is requesting proposals for the acquisition of and training associated with a Portable CCTV Camera Pipeline Inspection System. Sealed Proposals will be received end of business on Friday, March 15, 2013 at the Village of Saranac Lake – Village Offices Attention: Mr. Paul Treasurer 39 Main Street Saranac Lake, New York INSTRUCTIONS Attached is the RFP Package: All bidders must be registered. To register, bidders must confirm their interest by sending a letter or an email confirmation to: Kibben Consulting, LLC Janet Kibben, Consultant 932 Kiwassa Lake Road Saranac Lake, NY 12983 jkibben@kibbenconsulting.com Transmittal include: Company Name Company Address Contact Person Name Contact Person Phone Number Contact Person address Request for Information (RFI) will be accepted for Registered Firms only. All RFI requests must be sent via to: Janet Kibben, Consultant Kibben Consulting, LLC
Would the surveillance require you to contact individuals in ways which they may find intrusive? If a PIA is deemed necessary, then complete the 6 steps below: Step One: Identify the need for a PIA explain what the project aims to achieve, what the benefits will be to the organisation, to individuals and to other parties linking to other relevant documents related to the project, for example a project proposal will be helpful summarise why the need for a PIA was identified (this can draw on your answers to the screening questions) Step Two: Describe the information flows The collection use and deletion of personal data should be described here, and it may also be useful to refer to a flow diagram or another way of explaining data flows. You should also say how many individuals are likely to be affected by the project. Consultation requirements Explain what practical steps you will take to ensure that you identify and address privacy risks Who should be consulted, internally and externally? How will you carry out the consultation? You should link this to the relevant stages of your project management process Consultation can be used at any stage of the PIA process. Step Three: identify the privacy and related risks Identify the key privacy risks and the associated compliance and corporate risks. Larger-scale PIAs might record this information on a more formal risk register. Annex three can be used to help identify the DPA related compliance risks. Privacy issue Risk to individuals Compliance risk Associated organisation / corporate risk Step Four: Identify privacy solutions
brief history if relevant. 6 Context – community (suggested maximum 300 words) Description of local community with demographics. 7 Context – economy (suggested maximum 400 words) Local economy, e.g. business, tourism, manufacture, etc, ‘Starting i.e. where are you now? 8 Related initiatives What else is going on in the community of economic importance, e.g. BID, LEP, CIC, CCF, CRF CCT Plan 9 Ambition A positive statement of the aims and objectives of the plan and a description of what the team will achieve by its delivery. Description of ‘what success will look like’. 10 Needs of the community and intentions of the team to meet them. Identify the needs of the community and the opportunities to meet them. Each element should be Specific, Measureable, Achievable, Realistic and Timed (SMART).
resources, skills, time, etc) 22 Funding Identification of funding streams and how costs of project(s) will or could be met. 23 Maximising resources and costs Describe how this will be minimised, e.g. shared services, use of technology, avoidance of bureaucracy, etc. Communications 24 Consultation Describe existing results of consultations, planned consultation exercises and expressions of support. 25 Describe plans to involve and inform partners and other bodies, including accountable body, DCLG and CCA. 26 Communication with community How will the community and stakeholders be involved and informed of progress and outcomes. 27 Communications Contact Details of local contact for comms, media and informing DCLG et al of updates, events, etc. Name, tel, email, address, etc CCT Logistics
Mr. Herbst Room # 10532 (281) 604-7567 E-mail: herbstm@lpisd.org Materials Needed: Binder/Folder (students are expected to keep all work and handouts for the year!) Composition Notebook/ Spiral Notebook/ Other Note taking organization system 1 pack of notebook paper 1 pack of #2 pencils 1 pack of graph paper Year at a Glance 1st 6 Weeks Unit 1: Introduction to Forensic Science and Careers Unit 2: History of Forensic Science, Law, and Ethics Unit 3: The Crime Scene 4th 6 Weeks Unit 6: Ballistics, Tool marks, Arson, and Explosives Unit 7: Forensic Anthropology Unit 8: Fingerprints 2nd 6 Weeks Unit 3: The Crime Scene contd. Unit 4A: Trace Analysis (Hair and Fiber) Unit 4B: Trace Analysis (Glass, Tire and Footwear impressions) 5th 6 Weeks Unit 9: Forensic Toxicology and Forensic Serology Unit 10: DNA and DNA Analysis 3rd 6 Weeks Unit 5: Death: Meaning, Manner, Mechanism, Cause and Time 6th 6 Weeks Unit 11: Handwriting Analysis, Forgery, and Counterfeiting. Unit 12: Forensic Psychology, Case Studies, and Practical Examinations How I Run This Classroom Rules) I will be prepared to teach your lesson, so I ask you to come to class prepared to learn with all materials necessary and an optimistic attitude. I will respect all ideas, thoughts, and questions put forth, and I ask you to do the same. I will respect all property, and I ask you to respect all property as well (this includes school, personal property, and personal space.) I will only papers that are legible and turned in during the time frame allotted. We will follow all rules set forth by the La Porte Independent School District and strive to achieve what the La Porte High School Mission Statement sets forth. Grading: Below is the breakdown of how grades will be recorded. You can expect at least TWO major grades per six weeks, so each is worth 20% of your six weeks average. Major Grades 50% Grades 40% Writing Assignments 10% Total 100%
The Crawford County Veterans Hall of Fame is making available inscribed paving bricks to honor all service personnel at the Veterans Monument located at the Bucyrus Court House. Two sizes are available, 4 x 8 x 2-1/ 4 and 8 x 8 x 2-1/4. Wording allowed will be Name, Rank, Branch of Service, Unit, and Conflict, In Memory Of or any combination of the above. No other word ing will be allowed . Please fill in the form below showing wording, 15 letters per line including spaces. Carefully print letters in the block and leave required spaces between words. 4 x 8 x 2-1/4 (Standard) PAVING BRICK · $100 LineOne LineTwo If necessary, Line Three 8 x 8 x 2-1/4 (Square) PAVING BRICK $200 Line One Line Two Line Three Line Four Line Five STREET ______________________________ CITY ___ STATE __________ ZIP _____________ Make checks payable to: The Crawford County Veterans Hall of Fame - Veterans Monument Fund PO Box 324 Bucyrus, Ohio RETURN THIS FORM AND PAYMENT TO ABOVE ADDRESS
Verify that all eBooks have the “EBOOK” call number prefix. Import records for any book orders that have arrived and shelve the items. Reshelve items that are in promotional displays Reshelve reserves or other items that no longer need to be pulled out. Straighten up shelves as needed. Preparing Your Software are a number of tasks that must be done in Destiny before you begin scanning items. These tasks can be done well in advance, but they should be completed in the order listed below. Print Preliminary Reports Collection Statistics Summary: Reports > Library > Statistics > Collection Statistics – Summary > Printable Library Statistics Snapshot: Reports > Library > Statistics > Library Statistics > Printable Clear Out Old Inventories Go to the Inventory Screen in Destiny and make sure that there are no unfinalized inventories still from previous years. Go to Back Office > Inventory > View In Progress and Competed Inventories > In Progress If you find any inventories in progress, finalize them, and choose the option to ignore items that are unaccounted for (do not mark them “lost”). Delete any old completed inventories. Go to Back Office > Inventory > View In Progress and Competed Inventories > Completed Make a note of the date of your schools last inventory. Click “Remove” to delete any old completed inventories any that are older than the previous school year. Set Up a New “Full” Inventory for the Current Year Destiny allows you to divide your inventory into sections for easier organization and management. In order to take advantage of this feature, you must set up a “Full” inventory, then create individual section inventories with it. Even if you are not conducting a complete inventory of your collection, you still begin by setting up a “Full” inventory in Destiny. Go to Back Office > Inventory and click “Start New.” Type an inventory name that identifies the type of inventory and date (e.g., “Full – April 2015”) Leave “Call Numbers from” selection open so all media center items will be included. Verify that the current date is entered beside “Except for copies that have been seen on or after.”
Directions: Circle a response for each row below. Total the points by using the numerical value for each column. 4 Points 3 Points 2 Points 1 Point Quality of Work Superior Very Good Average Poor Knowledge of Work Excellent Good Adequate Insufficient Work Attitude Very enthusiastic Shows great interest Shows normal interest Indifferent; uninterested Attendance/ Punctuality Attends daily; always on time Occasionally absent or late Warned for tardiness/truancy Frequently absent or late Ability Makes accurate, decisions Needs occasional guidance from supervisor/others Often needs help with decisions Cannot make own decisions Industry (Diligence) Industrious; works extra Works steadily; good effort Persistent in efforts Avoids work; not persistent Work Initiative Seeks additional tasks; highly motivated Alert to opportunities; makes good suggestions Regular work performed promptly Needs explanation of routine work Organizational Ability Highly capable of organizing Fairly organized Disorganized occasionally Disorganized often Attitude Toward Others Positive; takes active friendly interest in others Pleasant, polite Sometimes difficult to work with Inclined to be quarrelsome, uncooperative Acceptance of Responsibility Welcomes responsibility Accepts willingly without protest Accepts under protest Avoids responsibility whenever possible Total Points Received on Page 1 & 2: _________ Worksite Supervisor Signature _______________ Date
Comments – Team came up with several options to use, so it was recommend that this needs the advice from OGC. Amy will present OGC a couple of examples and see what they recommend. Due – Amy, Next meeting 6511807 – Change Label on Business Entity Screen Action – On Hold - Talk to Requester for Verification Comments – Need to find out if what date type need to be actually need to use. Due – Regina, next meeting 6518331 – Add Checkbox for Anonymous Complaints Action – On Hold, taking back to team Comments –Right now, the complaint field is blue and underline. Regina will talk to the team about the CR 5837333, which is already been approved by PMT to see if these checkboxes really need to be added. Due - Regina ATTENDEES Adam Fast, Bart Di Giovanni, Amy Blechinger, Regina Ware, Roderick Prather, Tina Dillard, Kevin Struder, Jared Koch,
CCWG Meeting Minutes [December 21, 2010] MINUTES Next meeting will be a face to face meeting in Atlanta and is attentively scheduled for the week of [January 24, 2011]. Travel days, will be that on that Monday and Friday. Regina will be email the group when the arrangements have been made. Some Agenda Items for the face to face meeting: Roles and Charter discussion All new CR’s will be addressed Any other request need to be submitted to Rod ASAP The group said goodbyes to Adam Fast, Nilsa Ramos and Jared Koch. Also welcomed the new team members to the Sarah Childress, Jack Jensen, and Kari McPherson to the team. Regina will be getting the new member add to the email list and add them to the ECM CCWG group in PAS. She will notify them when this is complete. Old CRs CRs reviewed include the following: 6511807 – Change Label on Business Entity Screen Action – Bug Fix Comments – Regina worked with the Patti and Regina had this add to the last PAS update. 6574071 – Shift (or Corner) testing of scales Action – Disapproved, forward to PMT Comments – Weighing technical team has comeback recommend disapproving this CR, due to they are still using these types of scale tests. ON HOLD On Hold 6441594 – Use of Introductory Remarks in Formal Interviews (Kevin will get feedback from legal specialists, legal specialist meeting scheduled for 11/4/10) Action – Approved, to Forward to PMT Comments - At the Legal Specialist at their meeting last month, would like to move this forward that give them options and more consistently in the field and the legal specialist on how to conduct Formal Interview. On Hold 6506884 – Standardize Process for Authenticating Evidence (Documents) in the Case File
Action – On Hold, Jack will look with the legal specialist Comments – If you change the form you need to look at the instructions also. Due Date – Next Meeting ATTENDEES Roderick Prather, Amy Blechinger, Regina Ware, Tina Dillard, Kevin Studer, Kari McPherson, Bart Di Giovanni, Sarah Childress, and John “Jack” Jensen
Comments- CA-1 Market Review - Custodial Analysis Sub Module Work Instructions needs to be changed New Business 6441594 – Use of Introductory Remarks in Formal Interviews Action: Tabled – subject matter experts Comments: Kevin would like to have this looked at by the legal specialist team meeting next month. Also have an OGC look at this. And to talk to the submitter. Possible have the submitter separate the content into different pieces. Due: Kevin, End of October 6450520 – Changes to ECM and AMS for Workflows and Queries Action: Approved – Forward to PMT Comments: Regina gave the AMS and ECM estimates. ECM is 120 hrs and $16,140 and AMS is 32 hrs $4000. ATTENDEES Adam Fast, Bart Di Giovanni, Amy Blechinger, Regina Ware, Roderick Prather, Tina Dillard, Kevin Struder, Jared Koch
CCWG Meeting Minutes [January 24, 2013] MINUTES Next Meeting – Feb 14, 2013 at 11am Eastern Time. Newsletter will highlight members of the Old CRs CRs reviewed include the following: 7332587 – Change in Entity Structure for Scales Action – Tabled Comments – The developers will have to do some reprogramming, which can be costly. Decided to table for a cost estimate. Deadline: Next Meeting 7458324 – Add Clearors to Deregistration Process Action – Tabled Comments – Ladondra was not at the meeting to give update on status. Deadline: Next Meeting 7476526 – Redundant Follow-up on Registration and Bonding Action – Tabled Comments – Ladondra was not at the meeting to give update on status. Deadline: Next Meeting New Business 7499349 – Swine Contract Review Module Action – Tabled Comments - A swine contract module was created. Suggests were made to add some Regulations. A team (Wayne, Kari, Stephanie) to work with Gayle on adding these changes. Deadline: Feb 25, or next meeting 7553872 – Proposed Amendments to Weight Regulations Action – Approved, move to PMT Comments – It was suggested that comments were missing from the regulations. Tim Hansen says that the regulations are stuck over with the Under Secretary, and no rule making is happening at this point. If there are major changes the rule will have to start all over. This will be brought up to the PMT, to make sure this is still out there.
CCWG Meeting Minutes [November 11, 2011] MINUTES Next Meeting – December 1, 2011 Regina discussed with the team PMTs decision on selecting the PLD replacement this year. The team discussed changing the vote process. There will now be a separate election for chair and vice chair. The reporter will be responsible for providing the chair with what CRs need to be on the agenda. So the Chair and the Reporter will work on getting the agenda finalized. Put something in the charter that states the Chair is responsible for providing information on the PMT’s decision for CRs to the ODA secretary within X number of days after the PMT meeting. Team should ensure that they state what group should implement the CR. BEAD will update the charter with these changes plus Bart’s recommended changes and supply before the Dec. 1st meeting. Old CRs CRs reviewed include the following: 6985349- Add line to special reports for the date of custodial reconciliation/balance Action – Approved -Forward to PMT Comments – Onetisha contacted auditors in her region for more information and got feedback that information needs to change. Entities are confused on what information is being asked on the Custodial Special Report. It should be changed to “Ending Balance As Of”. Amy contacted Catherine Grasso stated that if we are only clarifying and not increase burden then we can change the form. This will be on the Balance Sheet and the Custodial Report. PLD Implementation 7002435– Requests for Guidance or Interpretation Action – Tabled Comments – Tabled awaiting input from Kevin Studer Due Date: Next Meeting 7010856 – DOJ Website Case Links Action – Tabled, Comments – Tabled awaiting from Kevin Studer 7012627– Add Subpoena Enforcement to ECM workflow Action – Tabled
CCWG Meeting Minutes [July 14, 2011] MINUTES Next meeting is scheduled for [August 11, 2011] at 11am EST. Reporter Position: Kari will be taking this position over. Old CRs CRs reviewed include the following: 6506884 – Standardize Process for Authenticating Evidence (Documents) in the Case File Action – Approved, forward to PMT Comments – Amy did some follow-up work for this CR and isn’t quite done. Still has work to do with the Standardize case format. There also will be updates to Work Instructions 29 and 53. 6719111 – GIPSA Internet Page Action – Approved, forward to PMT Comments – The Team thought it would be good to add the mail address, city and state for the each of the suspended also. Due Date – Next Meeting 6774164 – Formal or Structured Interviews Action – On-Hold Comments – Rod will talk to submitter to get clarification on the CR. Due Date – Next meeting 6776855 – Expand Description in ECM Action – Approved, forward to PMT Comments – Cost Estimate can back from the developer for $16,500, but a toggle button next to the description can be add for no cost, will allow the user to expand/collapse the text area. The team the toggle expansion option and disregarded the quick print button idea, to the amount of the cost. New Business 6802738 – Add More Titles to Document Type Action – Approved Comments – Regina what more clarification on the list 684475 – Add Referred to DOJ Option
CCWG Meeting Minutes [February 16, 2012] MINUTES Next Meeting – March 15, 2012 at 11am Eastern Time. Quarterly Reports is in works Newsletter is in final stages Old CRs CRs reviewed include the following: 6664062– Handling of case files returned from OGC Action – Tabled Comments – OGC wants to return cases at any point. Suggests that they go back to OGC to see where and how to add this in, due to they are already doing it. Stephanie will check into this since she is working on the PLD/OGC SOP’s Due Date: Next meeting 6839606– Requesting for more timely enforcement with the industry Action – Approved, forward to PMT Comments – CCWG is suggesting it is a good idea, and have PMT form a team to check into this idea. The team would also look into any change needed to SOP, WI’s and other things. Stipulation process would have to revisited also 7002435– Requests for Guidance or Interpretation Action – Approved, Forward to PMT Comments – It was suggest this possible a team put together. Plus, ask PMT to decide if this is a Work Instruction or SOP. Due Date: Next Meeting 7022619– Update WI-1 Financial Instrument Calculation to address new calculation process for Clause 2/3 Clearing Agency Action – Tabled Comments – This is being forward to the FTT team. Due Date: Next Meeting 7046622– Displaying the Status of the Scale in Business Entity and Facility Screens Action – Tabled Comments – Replacing the Business Entity number with a Scale Status. Regina will get a cost estimate, on both solutions. Due Date: Next meeting
HLATSHWAYO JCC: I agree GUVAVA JCC: I agree MAVANGIRA JCC: I agree Mangwana & Partners, applicant’s legal practitioners Civil Division of the Attorney-General’s Office, first respondent’s legal practitioners Venturas & Samukange, second respondent’s practitioners
Section 23(1) of the Constitution provides: “23 PROTECTION FROM DISCRIMINATION ON THE GROUNDS OF RACE, ETC (1) Subject to the provisions of this section— (a) no law shall make any provision that is discriminatory either of itself or in its effect; and (b) no person shall be treated in a discriminatory manner by any person acting by virtue of any written law or in the performance of the functions of any public office or any public authority. (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), a law shall be regarded as making a provision that is discriminatory and a person shall be regarded as having been treated in a discriminatory manner if, as a result of that law or treatment, persons of a particular description by race, tribe, place of origin, political opinions, colour, creed, sex, gender, marital status or physical disability are prejudiced— (a) by being subjected to a condition, restriction or disability to which other persons of another such description are not made subject; or (b) by the according to persons of another such description of a privilege or advantage which is not accorded to persons of the first-mentioned description; and the imposition of that condition, restriction or disability or the according of that privilege or advantage is wholly or mainly attributable to the description by race, tribe, place of origin, political opinions, colour, creed, sex, gender, marital status or physical disability of the persons concerned.” The applicants allege that they were treated in a discriminatory manner in that firstly, they were subjected to sanitary conditions, restrictions or disabilities that peculiarly isolate them and amount to inhuman and degrading treatment. In that connection it was submitted that:- ‘treatment which results in some partiality or inequality of treatment is the popular meaning of the word ‘discrimination’ and is the meaning which should be adopted in this case for ‘It is the duty of the court to hold the scales evenly between different classes of the community and to declare invalid practice, which...results in partial and unequal treatment to a substantial degree between different sectors of the community.”
for the rights and freedoms of other persons”. The analysis of conflicting rights postulated by s 86(1) calls for an essentially unitary approach. The question whether a given right is being exercised reasonably is inextricably intertwined with the question whether it is being exercised with due regard for the rights and freedoms of others. What is required is the balancing of actually or potentially antagonistic rights, having regard to the nature of those rights, the manner in and the extent to which they impinge upon one another, and the circumstances in which they have been or are to be exercised. It is trite that a contract concluded in contravention of the written or unwritten law, or one that is contrary to public policy, is susceptible to being struck down and rendered of no force or effect. The doctrine of sanctity of contracts is obviously subject to constitutional limits. As was observed in Bredenkamp and Others v Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd 2010 (4) SA 468 (SCA) at para. 39, every contract or institutional rule must pass constitutional muster. Again, in Barkhuizen v Napier 2007 (5) SA 323 (CC) at para. 15, it was emphasised that: “All law, including the common law of contract, is now subject to constitutional control. The validity of all laws depends on their consistency with the provisions of the Constitution and the values that underlie our Constitution. The application of the principle pacta sunt servanda is, therefore, subject to constitutional control.” Adv. Mafukidze submits that the School’s contract of admission contains unlawful and onerous terms and conditions targeted against members of different faiths. They are contrary to public policy and therefore cannot qualify as rules capable of
1. It is declared that the appellant has been denied the right to the equal protection and benefit of the law protected and guaranteed in section 56(1) of the Constitution of Zimbabwe. 2. It is declared that the appellant’s property rights protected in section 71 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe have been infringed. 3. Consequently it is ordered that the judgment of the Supreme Court be set aside and the following be substituted: ‘The appeal is dismissed with costs’. 4. The respondent shall pay the costs of this appeal.” Attempts to evict Autoband on the strength of the Supreme Court order were resisted by Autoband on the ground that Autoband had noted an appeal to the Constitutional Court. Autoband contended that the appeal to the Constitutional Court had the effect of suspending the operation of the Supreme Court order. Given this situation, the Sheriff was at a loss on how to proceed. In an effort to find a way forward, Streamsleigh filed the present Chamber application. In this Chamber application Streamsleigh contends that the notice of appeal is void and of no effect. Streamsleigh further argues that because the notice of appeal is a nullity, there is therefore no appeal before the Constitutional Court and the eviction of Autoband should proceed. Autoband, on the other hand, contends that the appeal is valid. The respective stances of the parties are aptly captured in paragraphs 1 and 2 of Autoband’s heads of argument, which read as follows: “1. The present application is one for: 1.1 A declaration that the notice of appeal filed by the respondent in case number CCZ 43/2014 does not raise a constitutional question and is consequently void, and 1.2 An order directing that a writ of execution, purporting to have been issued out of the Supreme Court (which does not issue
GARWE JA: I agree HLATSHWAYO JA: I agree JA: I agree GUVAVA JA: I agree CHIWESHE AJA: I agree Advocate J.B. Wood, first – third applicant’s legal practitioners. Messrs Manase & Manase, fourth applicant’s legal practitioners. The Attorney-General’s Office, respondent’s practitioners
REPORTABLE (69) DISTRIBUTED BY veritas e-mail: veritas@mango.zw www.veritaszim.net Veritas every effort to ensure the provision of reliable information, but cannot take legal responsibility for information supplied ARTHUR MUTAMBARA vs THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ZIMBABWE COMMISSIONER GENERAL OF POLICE CONSTITUTIONAL OF ZIMBABWE CHIDYAUSIKU CJ, MALABA DCJ, ZIYAMBI JCC, GWAUNZA JCC, JCC, GOWORA JCC, HLATSHWAYO JCC, GUVAVA JCC & MAVANGIRA AJCC HARARE, 14 MAY 2014 & NOVEMBER 18, 2015 Z. T. Chadambuka, for the applicant S. Fero, for the 1st respondent No appearance for the 2nd respondent GWAUNZA JA: This application followed a referral of the matter to this Court by the Magistrates Court in terms of s 24 (2) of the former Constitution of Zimbabwe (“the old Constitution”). The applicant sought an order declaring s 31 (a) (iii) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act, (Chapter 9:23) (“the Code,”) and his arrest in terms of that
[39] In v The Queen [1986] 1 SCR 863,919, para [145], another Canadian case, the concept of security of the person was said to encompass protection against: “overlong subjection to the vexations and vicissitudes of a pending criminal accusation” which include: “stigmatisation of the accused, loss of privacy, stress and anxiety resulting from a multitude of factors including possible disruption of family, social life and work, legal costs, uncertainty as to outcome and sanction. These forms of prejudice cannot be disregarded nor minimised when assessing the reasonableness of delay.”” THERE MUST BE GOOD REASON FOR A STAY TO BE GRANTED [40] A further general principle that must be in mind in a case of this nature is that, whilst each case must be decided on its merits, the grant of a permanent stay is an exceptional remedy – Clipsal Australia (Pty) Ltd v Gap Distributors (Pty) Ltd 2009 (3) ALL SA 491 (SCA); 2010 (2) SA 289 (SCA). [41] In Wells v Queen [2010] VSCA 100, the Supreme Court of Victoria (Australia) accepted that it is only in an exceptional or extreme case that a court would grant a permanent stay on the basis that such proceedings constituted an abuse of process and that the test to be applied is: “’whether, in all the circumstances, the continuation of the proceedings would involve unacceptable injustice or unfairness’, or whether the continuation of the proceedings would be ‘so unfairly and unjustifiably oppressive’ as to constitute an abuse of process”. [42] The power to stay proceedings permanently may be exercised: “where either the foundation of the prosecution or the bringing of the accused to justice is tainted with illegal action or gross violation of the rights of the individual making it unacceptable for justice to embark on its course” - ICC 01/04-01/06-772, (Appeals Decision) para 30-31, The Prosecutor v Thomas Lubanga Dyilo (International Criminal Court), 14 December 2006.
CONTRACTING, RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT, CUSTOMER SERVICE, IMPLEMENTATION, AND DISASTER RECOVERY PLANS 6.1 Experience & Operational Capability 15 6.2 Organizational & Financial Capacity 16 6.3 Contracting, Relationship Management, Implementation, Customer Service, Disaster Recovery 16 7.0.0 SCOPE OF REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL WORK – CARDHOLDER PRESENT MERCHANT CARD PROCESSING 17 7.1 General Questions: All Respondents 18 7.2 Cardholder Present Processing 24 7.3 Optional Card Processing Services for Taxi Cab Drivers 27 8.0.0 REQUEST FOR INFORMATION – MERCHANT CARD AND E-CHECK PROCESSING 30 9.0.0 SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS PRACTICES 32 10.00 I II III IV V EXHIBITS CCSF Cardholder Present Merchant Card Processing Requirements CCSF Cardholder Not-Present Merchant Card & E-Check Processing Requirements 38 40 41 42 43
Controlled Vocabulary and the need for defining this Controlled Vocabulary has been identified. Output Type 3.7.1 Due to the fact that for this property no Controlled Vocabulary has been defined on the European the MSs may use their own Controlled Vocabulary and the need for defining this Controlled Vocabulary has been identified. Cost Currency 3.8.3 European Publications Office's Currencies Named Authority List (NAL) Channel Type 3.9.3 E-mail Homepage Fax Assistant Telephone Rule Language 3.11.3 European Publications Office's Languages Named Authority List (NAL) Formal Framework Language 3.12.3 European Publications Office's Languages Named Authority List (NAL) Status 3.12.4 European Legislation Identifier: in force not in force partially applicable implicitly revoked explicitly revoked repealed expired suspended other Subject 3.12.5 Eurovoc domains Territorial Application 3.12.6 NUTS taxonomy Type 3.12.7 Resource Types Named Authority Lists (NAL) Agent Type 3.13.3 Agent Person Public Organization Public Organization Administrative 3.14.1 NUTS taxonomy Type 3.14.4 Public Organization
The Rule Class The Rule represents a document that sets out the specific rules, guidelines or procedures that the Public Service follows. It includes the terms of service, licence, and authentication requirements of the Public Service. Instances of the Rule class are FRBR Expressions, that is, a concrete expression such as a document, of the more abstract concept of the rules themselves. Rules are used for validating the input required by the Public Service, deciding on the eligibility of the user, steering the Public Service process and defining the dependencies/relationships between Public Services. The CPSV-AP does not envisage instances of the Rule class as machine-readable business rules. Detailed modelling of the related to Public Services is out of scope of the CPSV-AP. Identifier [1..1] This property represents a formally-issued Identifier for the Rule. Description [1..1] This property represents a free text Description of the Rule. Language [0..n] This property represents the language(s) in which the Rule is available. This could be one or multiple languages, for instance in countries with more than one official language. The possible values for this property are described in a controlled vocabulary. The recommended controlled vocabularies are listed in section 4. Name [1..1] This property represents the name of the Rule. Implements [0..n] The Implements property links a Rule to relevant legislation or policy documents i.e. the Formal Framework under which the Rules are being defined (see section 3.15). The Formal Framework Class This class represents the legislation, policy or policies that lie behind the Rules that govern the service. The definition and properties of the Formal Framework class in the CPSV-AP are aligned with the ontology included in “Council conclusions inviting the introduction of the European Legislation Identifier (ELI)”. Name [1..1] This property represents the Name of the Formal Framework.
Endowed College- Weill Cornell Medical College EN-WCMC Endowed activity in these spaces supports the academic mission of the Weill Cornell Medical College. A space with this EN categorization can benefit financially for the unit it represents IF its primary purpose is to support the academic mission and not gain revenue. Each facility at WCMC has a placeholder for WCMC in the inventory system; these placeholder rooms should be flagged with EN-WCMC Endowed College- New York Tech Campus EN-NYTC Endowed activity in these spaces supports the academic mission of the New York Tech Campus. A space with this EN categorization can benefit financially for the unit it represents IF its primary purpose is to support the academic mission and not gain revenue. All assignable program areas supporting the academic mission Contract College- General Services CC-GNRLSERV Space for contract college activity that is paid for with central funds allocated to central administrative units or; Space for central administrative contract college activity for which the maintenance and operations of the space are shared by Campus through the stewardship assessment. Funded through University allocated costs Assignable program spaces supporting central administrative units; non-assignable spaces such as corridors, staircases, custodial storage, mechanical rooms Contract College (Select appropriate college) CC-CALS CC-CALS-GNVA CC-CHE CC-CVM CC-ILR Contract College activity in these spaces supports the academic mission of the selected college. A space with this CC categorization can benefit financially for the unit it represents IF its primary purpose is to support the academic mission and not gain revenue. Note: If a Contract College becomes a lead dean for a centrally sponsored program, the space may need to be flagged as EN-COLL. Verify flag with University Budget Office. All assignable program areas supporting the academic mission