Notice Date Case Number Case Name Summary of Fairness Hearing Date For more information 4-2-2018 13-CV-1836 (W.D. Wash.) In re: Atossa Genetics, Inc. Securities Litigation Plaintiff alleges that Atossa and Quay made materially and misleading statements to Atossa investors in violation of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j (b), 78t (a), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5 (the "Exchange Act"). Not set yet For more inforamtion write or call: Jeffrey C. Block Jacob A. Walker BLOCK & LEVITON LLP 155 Federal Street Suite 400 Boston, MA 02110 617 398-5600 (Ph.) 4-3-2018 12-CV-2311 (E.D. Mich.) In re: Auto Parts Antitrust Litigation (Instrument Panel Cloisters) Plaintiffs bring this lawsuit as a proposed class action against the Defendants, manufacturers and suppliers of Instrument Panel Clusters globally and in the United States, for engaging in a lengthy conspiracy to suppress and eliminate competition in the automotive parts industry by agreeing to rig bids for, and to fix, stabilize, and maintain the prices of these products, which were sold to automobile manufacturers in the United States and elsewhere. The Defendants’ conspiracy successfully targeted the United States automotive industry, raising prices for car manufacturers as well as car and truck dealers. Not set yet For more information write to: BARRETT LAW P.A. P.O. Box 927 404 Court Square Lexington, MS 39095 GILBERT & LaDUCA, LLP 4725 Wisconsin Avenue, NW Suite 200 Washington, DC 20016 LARSON • KING, LLP 2800 Fargo Place 30 East Seventh Street St. Paul, MN 4-5-2018 (M.D. Pa.)
Canfield v. Statoil USA Onshore Properties, Inc. Plaintiffs claim that Statoil underpaid Royalties relating to gas produced from wells located in Pennsylvania pursuant to certain provisions of oil and gas leases. The Action alleges that Statoil inappropriately used an Index Pricing Methodology on which to base its Royalty payments rather than a Resale Price. Plaintiffs sought monetary damages and prejudgment interest. Not set yet For more information write to: Douglas A. Clark The Clark Law Firm, P.C. 1563 Main Street Peckville, PA 18452 Francis P. Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP 58 South Service Road Suite 200 Melville, NY 11747 4-5-2018 17-CV-00155 (D. Colo.) Amedee v. Level 3 Communications, Inc., et al. Re Defendants: Jeff K. Storey, James O. Ellis, Jr., Kevin P. Chilton, Steven T. Clontz, Irene M. Esteves, T. Michael Glenn, Spencer B. Hays, Michael Mahoney, Kevin W. Mooney, Peter Seahlimhuat and Peter VanOppen (collectively, “Defendants”) Plaintiff alleges that Level 3 and the Director Defendants violated Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder because the Preliminary Proxy failed to disclose material information relating to the proposed transaction. Plaintiff’s complaint (the “Complaint”) sought, among other things, injunctive relief prohibiting Defendants from consummating the proposed transaction, and other forms of equitable relief. Not set yet For more information write or call: Richard A. Acocelli WEISSLAW LLP 1500 Broadway, 16th Floor New York, NY 10036 212 628-3025 (Ph.) Donald J. Enright LEVI & KORSINSKY, LLP 1101 30th Street, N.W. Suite 115 Washington, DC 20007 202 524-4290 (Ph.) 4-5-2018 11-CV-5450 (S.D.N.Y.)
the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the California Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act, and the California Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act. Beverly Hills, CA 90212 4-23-2018 16-CV-00410 (E.D. Okla.) John Cecil v. B.P. America Production Company Plaintiff alleges BP knowingly and systematically underpaid royalties to Plaintiff and the putative members through a policy of paying no royalty for Fuel Gas, which BP implemented by failing to disclose to Plaintiff and other putative class members on their monthly royalty check stubs that BP was not paying royalty on Fuel Gas. Plaintiff seeks to recover the royalty BP owes it and the putative class for its breach of express covenants to pay royalties on Fuel Gas. In this case, Plaintiff brings claims against BP for breach of contract, tortious breach of contract, unjust enrichment, fraud (actual and constructive) and deceit, accounting, and injunction. 9-25-2018 For more information write, call or e-mail: Reagan E Bradford The Lanier Law Firm 100 E. California Avenue Suite 200 Oklahoma City, OK 73104 713 659-5200 (Ph.) 4-23-2018 14-CV-3084 (S.D. Tex.) In re: Willbros Group, Inc. Securities Litigation Lead Plaintiffs allege that Defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by, inter alia, issuing false and misleading statements or failing to disclose material adverse facts about the performance of two pipeline projects, the existence and effectiveness of internal controls, the Company’s Q1 and Q2 2014 financials, and the Company’s liquidity Not set yet For more information write to: ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP ELLEN GUSIKOFF STEWART 655 West Broadway Suite 1900 San Diego, CA 92101