zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
The 19th International Symposium on Advanced Display Materials and Devices (ADMD 2015, October 22~25, 2015) ADMD 2015 Program Date / Time October 23, 2015 (Friday) 08:50 ~ 09:00 Registration 09:00 ~ 09:10 Opening Remarks: Prof. Lee Soon Park 09:10 ~ 09:40 Plenary Lecture Prof. Jun-ichi (Tokyo Institute of Technology) Chairman: Prof. Jianhua Zhang 09:40 ~ 10:10 Prof. Yanlei Yu (Fudan University) 10:10 ~ 10:40 Dr. Jong-Geun Yoon (LG Display) 10:40 ~ 11:00 Coffee 11:00 ~ 11:20 FPD/LCD Session OLED/Solar cell Session Invited Dr. Fumiaki Kodera (DIC, Japan) Chairman: Prof. Seiji Kurihara Invited Noh (Dongguk University) Chairman: Prof. Yungu Lee 11:20 ~ 11:40 Invited Dr. Wei Hu (Nanjing University) Invited Prof. Lian Duan (Tsinghua University) 11:40 ~ 11:50 Break Time Time 11:50 ~ 12:10 Invited Prof. Takahiro Seki (Nagoya University) Invited Dr. Joong Tark Han (KoreaElectotechnology Research Institute) 12:10 ~ 12:30 Invited Prof. Kenji Katayama (Chuo University) Invited Prof. Honglong Ning (South China University of Technology) 12:30 ~ 14:00 Lunch (Attach poster until lunch) 14:00 ~ 17:40 Session III (Poster) 18:00 ~ Banquet October 22(Thursday), 2015 : Reception (7:00 ~ 8:30 p.m.), The-K Geongju city, Korea. October 24(Saturday), 2015 : Tour (2:00 ~ 6:00 p.m.): Gyeongju city (Bulguksa Temple, Anapji Pond, Gyeongju museum, Cheomseongdae Observatory) ADMD 2015 Program
Date / Time October 24, 2015 (Saturday) 09:00 ~ 09:30 Plenary Lecture Prof. Hideo Hosono (Tokyo Institute of Technology) Chairman: Prof. Jun-ichi Hanna 09:30 ~ 10:00 Prof. Jin Jang (Kyung Hee University) 10:00 ~ 10:30 Prof. Jianhua Zhang (Shanghai University) 10:30 ~ 10:50 Coffee Break 10:50 ~ 11:10 FPD/LCD Session OLED/Solar cell Session Invited Prof .Wei Lee / Mr. Hsiao (National Chiao Tung University) Chairman: Prof. Lian Duan Invited Prof. Jun Yeob Lee (Sungkyunkwan University) Chairman: Prof. Jang Hyuk Kwon 11:10 ~ 11:30 Invited Dr. Goto (Nissan Chemical Industries) Invited Prof. Lianqiao Yang (Shanghai University) 11:30 ~ 11:40 Break Time 11:40 ~ 12:00 Invited Prof. Tae-Hoon Yoon (Pusan National University) Chairman: Prof. Takahiro Seki Invited Prof. Jang Hyuk Kwon Hee University) Chairman: Prof. Lianqiao Yang 12:00 ~ 12:20 Invited Dr. Shigeyuki Yamada (Ritsumeikan University) Invited Prof. Yungu Lee (Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology) 12:20 ~ 12:40 Invited Prof. Tsuyoshi Fukaminato (Kumamoto University) Invited Mr. Hsiao (National Chiao Tung University) 12:40 ~ 12:50 Closing Remarks: Prof. Tomiki Ikeda
Publication: Yes Data Cleansing: P&A#12 Services (Not Included Above) (Q.101) Variable: otherTraining Publication: Yes Data Cleansing: P&A#12 Total Clients Served (Organization and Other Development Services Providers) (Q.102) Variable: totdevOrgClientsNum, totdevOtherDspNum Publication: Yes Data Cleansing: Apply P&A#10, P&A#14, and P&A#5. Replace with the sum of the subcomponents if missing or the value is greater than the sum of the subcomponents. Affordable Housing (Organization and Other Development Services Providers) (Q.103) Variable: housingTotClientsNum, housingDspClientsNum Publication: Yes Data Cleansing: P&A#10, P&A#14, and P&A#5 Economic Development (Organization and Other Development Services Providers) (Q.104) Variable: econTotClientsNum, econDspClientsNum Publication: Yes Data Cleansing: Apply P&A#10, P&A#14, and P&A#5 Consumer Development (Organization and Other Development Services Providers) (Q.105) Variable: finTotClientsNum, finDspClientsNum Publication: Yes Data Cleansing: Apply P&A#10, P&A#14, and P&A#5 Other Services (Not Included Above) (Organization and Other Development Services Providers) (Q.106) Variable: othTotClientsNum, othDspClientsNum Publication: Yes Data Cleansing: P&A#10, P&A#14, and P&A#5
Capacity of Other Community Facility (Column CL) Variable: otherfacility Publication: Yes Data Cleansing: Apply P&A#10, P&A#11, P&A#7, and P&A#16 Square Feet of Real Estate – Total (Column CM) Variable: arearealestatetotal Publication: Yes Data Cleansing: P&A#10, P&A#11, P&A#7, and P&A#16. Calculate the total number of commercial real estate square feet namely “X” by adding square feet of manufacture, office, and retail. Replace “Square Feet of Real Estates – Total” with X if “Square Feet of Real Estates – Total” is missing. Treat as missing if less than 10. Square Feet of Real Estate – Manufacturing (Column CN) Variable: sqfremanufacture Publication: Yes Data Cleansing: Apply P&A#10, P&A#11, P&A#7, and P&A#16 Square Feet of Real Estate – Office (Column CO) Variable: sqfreoffice Publication: Yes Data Cleansing: Apply P&A#10, P&A#11, P&A#7, and P&A#16 Square Feet of Real Estate-Retail (Column CP) Variable: sqfreretail Publication: Yes Data Cleansing: Apply P&A#10, P&A#11, P&A#7, and P&A#16 Housing Units – Sale (Column CQ) Variable: housingunitssale Publication: No Data Cleansing: Apply P&A#10, P&A#11, P&A#7, and P&A#16 Housing Units – Rental (Column CR) Variable: housingunitsrent Publication: No Data Cleansing: Apply P&A#10, P&A#11, P&A#7, and P&A#16 Affordable Housing Units – Sale (Column CS) Variable: affordablehousesale Publication: Yes Data Cleansing: Apply P&A#10, P&A#11, P&A#7, and P&A#16
Specific targets for measuring these outcomes will be negotiated with the successful applicant(s) as part of their grant agreement. Eligible use of funding Grant funding must be used to develop and support business infrastructure related to the delivery of loans and small business support to financially excluded individuals, as well as associated financial and business literacy education. Applicants must submit a proposed budget using the Budget Template (at Attachment A). The grant may be used for: staff salaries and on-costs which can be directly attributed to the provision of services in the identified service area or areas as per the grant agreement employee training for paid and unpaid staff delivering Activities that are relevant, appropriate and in line with Activity objectives interpreting services to assist clients to access Activities, and operating and administration expenses directly related to the delivery of services, such as: telephones rent and outgoings computer / Information Technology/ website/ software insurance utilities postage stationery and printing accounting and auditing domestic travel/accommodation costs, and assets as defined in the Terms and Conditions that can be reasonably attributed to meeting agreement deliverables. Ineligible use of funding Service providers delivering services may NOT use funding for: loan capital purchase of land funding to retrospective costs costs incurred in the preparation of a funding application or related documentation; major construction/capital works seed funding or establishment grants for peak bodies or other new organisations (legal entities) overseas travel, or activities for which other Commonwealth, state, territory or local government bodies have primary responsibility.
CDFI Action Plan Template Purpose: To develop a preliminary CDFI Action Plan that will integrate the key learning from the three-day workshop to help address the CDFI’s opportunities for growth and sustainability. The CDFI Action Plan will be revised throughout the six-month training experience either through the Mentored Cohorts or One-to-One Technical Assistance. Goal: To determine if ABC CDFI should launch a new small business loan product to its target market. Action Plan Implementation (The Action Plan and Action Steps should be aligned and complementary) Action Steps What Will Be Done? Responsibilities Who Will Do It? Timeline By When? (Day/Month) Resources Resources Available Resources Needed (financial, human, political & other) Potential Barriers What individuals or organizations might resist? How? Communications Plan Who is involved? What methods? How often? Step 1: Develop a market analysis (“MA”). Consultants March 2013 A. TA Grant to pay for consultants B. Oversight from CEO and CLO A. Banks B. Concern with market saturation/competition Weekly status updates with consultants Step 2: Development business plan (“BP”). Consultants May 2013 A. TA Grant to pay for consultants B. Oversight from CEO and CLO A. CLO B. Cannibalization of other loan products Weekly status updates with consultants Step 3: Present findings to GB. CEO June 2013 A. Influence from Loan Review Committee B. Buy-in from local gov’t and others A. Bankers on GB B. Concern with risk of small business lending Monthly updates with GB and presentation of the findings from MA and BP. Step 4: If applicable, update P/P and create a marketing campaign. Chief Lending Officer (“CLO”) July 2013 A. Hire SBA 504 business lender B. At least $10k for marketing/promotion A. CLO and GB B. Want conservation underwriting for P/P Staff meeting announcing new products and weekly updates of marketing campaign. Step 5: Raise at least $10MM in lending capital CEO & Consultants December 2015 A. Create off-balance sheet loan fund B. Buy-in from local gov’t and others A. Banks and Foundations B. CDFI does not have a strong track record Monthly talks with lenders and investors for the new loan fund.
The Recipient agrees to comply with any Legislation applicable to its performance of this Agreement. The Recipient agrees, in carrying out its obligations under this Agreement, to comply with any of the Commonwealth’s policies as notified, referred or made available by the Commonwealth to the Recipient (including by reference to an internet site), including those listed in Item J. Applicable law and jurisdiction This Agreement is to be construed in accordance with, and any matter related to it is to be governed by, the law of the Australian Capital Territory specified in Item M. The parties submit to the jurisdiction of the courts of the Australian Capital Territory. Executed as a deed Executed by the parties as evidence of their agreement. SIGNED for and on behalf of the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA, as represented by and acting through the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development: ABN 86 267 354 017 Name of signatory ) ) ) Signature Position Insert Date In the presence of: Name of witness Signature of witness
ACADEMIC REGISTRY A copy of this completed form must be submitted to the Head of Academic Registry Operations and Enhancement Form submitted : Yes / No* Has an Equality Impact Assessment been carried out for the course? For further information see: (Please send a copy of the EIA to the University’s Equality and Diversity Manager ) Yes/No* Delete as appropriate (*) Please confirm the name of the Course Leader who has been appointed for this Course or the strategy to ensure that a Course Leader will be in place by the commencement of the Course. Please provide name of proposed External Examiner(s) for this course Existing Modules to be used Module Code Module Indicate with asterisk whether changes requiring approval First Academic Year Total places per annum* **Is the module adopted from another ? *ie total number of students on this module at this location per annum. **Please attach written confirmation that Head of Host School confirms places can be provided New Modules to be approved Module Code Module Proposed JACS and Code First Academic Year Total places per annum* **Is the module adopted from another ? *ie total number of students on this module at this location per annum. **Please attach written confirmation that Head of Host School confirms places can be provided DEGREE APPRENTICESHIPS only Standards or Framework Apprenticeship Standard Code If standard, designated Integrated Degree Yes/No* Employer Involvement in design of course
Existing Modules Module Code Module Title Indicate with asterisk whether changes requiring approval First Academic Year places per annum* **Is the module adopted from another ? *ie total number of students on this module at this location per annum. **Please attach written confirmation that Head of confirms places can be provided New Modules Module Code Module Title Proposed JACS and HECOS Code First Academic Year Total places per annum* **Is the module adopted from another ? *ie total number of students on this module at this location per annum. **Please attach written confirmation that Head of confirms places can be provided Course Code [Banner Officer] UCAS Code (for courses) [Admission Unit] DEGREE APPRENTICESHIPS only Standards or Framework Apprenticeship Standard Code If standard, designated Integrated Degree Y/N* Employer Involvement in design of course Delivery location postcode Percentage not taught by this institution Delete as appropriate (*) RESOURCE INFORMATION Course Funding Source Delete as appropriate (*) UK and EU students undertaking credit-bearing study are normally classified as HEFCE fundable and the course is part of the University (indirectly funded) or Partner (directly funded) HEFCE contract. The course should be included in the Partner’s ADP or post 1 Dec enrolment estimate. If there is another funding source or you have any queries, please contact Financial Planning ( or LNixon@uclan.ac.uk). time
Statutory and Regulatory Mandates for Elementary and Middle Schools Law/Regulation Requirement Possible Evidence Is the requirement met? Notes Ed. Law §3204(2)(ii) For schools that meet the criteria for Commissioner’s Determination: The curriculum provides academically rigorous instruction that develops critical thinking skills in the school's students, taking into account the entirety of the curriculum over the course of elementary and middle school; Instruction in English will prepare students to read fiction and nonfiction text for information and to use that information to construct written essays that state a point of view or support an argument; Instruction in mathematics will prepare students to solve problems using both number sense and fluency with mathematical functions and operations; Description of curriculum Representative samples of daily, weekly, monthly, yearly schedules Framework for teaching and learning in the core academic areas of English language arts, math, science, and social studies Sample lesson plans List of textbooks or other instructional resources Textbook/resource use demonstrated in curriculum and lesson plans Other: Y N world
8 NYCRR §§100.2, 100.3, 100.4, 100.5, 135.3, 135.4 Instruction is provided in required subjects, consistent with the NYS learning standards, as defined by Part 100 of the Commissioner’s Regulations (see Appendix A for a detailed list of Program Requirements) Description of curriculum Representative samples of daily, weekly, monthly, yearly schedules Framework for teaching and learning in the core academic of English language arts, math, science, and social studies Sample lesson plans List of textbooks or other instructional resources Textbook/resource use demonstrated in curriculum and lesson plans Other: Y N Ed. Law §3204(2)(i) English shall be the language of instruction for common branch subjects required by Ed. Law §3204 Framework for teaching and learning in the subjects of instruction required by Ed. Law §3204 Other: Y N Ed. Law §3204(2)(i) Pupils who have limited English proficiency shall be provided with instructional programs, as specified in Ed. Law and 8 NYCRR Part 154, to enable them to develop academically while achieving competence in the English language Framework for instructional programs for limited English proficient students as specified in Ed. Law §3204(2-a) and Part 154 of the Commissioner’s regulations Other: Y N
Is the building a safe place for children? Are there fire hazards which might endanger students, teachers or employees? Certificate of Occupancy Fire inspection report Other: Y N Building safety is verified by the local building authority in which the nonpublic school is located. Compliance with Health Mandate Requirement Possible Evidence Is the requirement met? Notes Enrolled children meet the immunization requirements for their grades Public Health Law §2164; 10 §66-1.1 Immunization records Exemption records Other: Y N
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR ACTIVITY 6 Title of Activity/Initiative International Conference for Least-Developed Countries (LDCs) on Copyright and the Management of Public Sector Information Brief description of the Activity/Initiative This activity consists of a global meeting aimed at raising awareness of selected LDCs on topics related to Public Sector Information and copyright. The selection of countries would take into account their readiness to implement any policy on the subject. The meeting would also provide a forum for discussion and sharing of existing policies implemented by Member States. The meeting be tailored to best meet LDC objectives; therefore the participation of a number of LDC representatives would be financed by WIPO. Target Beneficiaries Member States, especially LDCs; and society. Key WIPO Sectors Involved and Links to WIPO Programs: Copyright Law Division and Division for Countries. This activity/initiative links to a number of WIPO’s Strategic Goals, including Goal I – Balanced evolution of the international normative framework for IP; Goal III – Facilitating the use of IP for development; and Goal V – World Reference Source of IP information and analysis. and calendar Agree on venue, budget, dates, host country and invited participants; Draft program and selection of speakers; Prepare papers and material; and Create a dedicated webpage. Overall duration Nine months
- Self-evaluation report on the Project on Patents and the Public Domain See document CDIP/13/7. - Patent-Related Flexibilities in the Multilateral Legal Framework and their Legislative Implementation at the National and Regional Levels - Part III See document CDIP/13/10. Consideration of work program for implementation of adopted recommendations - Intellectual Property and Tourism: Supporting Development Objectives and Protecting Cultural Heritage in Egypt and Other Developing Countries See document CDIP/13/8. - Phase II of the Project on Capacity Building in the Use of Appropriate Technology – Specific Technical and Scientific Information as a Solution for Identified Development Challenges See document CDIP/13/9. - Continuation of discussion on Patent-Related Flexibilities in the Multilateral Legal Framework See documents CDIP/10/11, CDIP/10/11 Add. - Revised Proposal on Possible New WIPO Activities Related to Using Copyright to Promote Access to Information and Creative Content See document CDIP/13/11. - Information on the Activities of the IP and Global Challenges Program, Particularly on the Development-Related Aspects See document CDIP/13/12. - WIPO General Assembly Decision on CDIP related matters See document CDIP/12/5. - Terms of Reference for the Independent Review of the Implementation of the Development Agenda Recommendations No document - The International Conference on Intellectual Property and Development No document. - External Review of WIPO Technical Assistance in the Area of Cooperation for Development See document CDIP/8/INF/1. - Management Response to the External Review of WIPO Technical Assistance in the Area of Cooperation for Development (Document CDIP/8/INF/1) See document CDIP/9/14. - Report of the Ad Hoc Working Group on an External Review of WIPO Technical Assistance in the Area of Cooperation for Development See document CDIP/9/15. - Joint Proposal by the Development Agenda Group and the Africa Group on WIPO’s Technical Assistance in the Area of Cooperation for Development See document CDIP/9/16.
(IP) (DA 34). A 1. The evaluation will on assessing the project as a whole rather than on individual activities. The evaluation will concentrate on the project’s contribution to assessing the needs of Member States and identifying the resources or the means to address those needs, its evolution over time, its performance including project design, project management, coordination, implementation and results achieved. A specific focus of the evaluation will be to assess the extent to which the project has been instrumental in contributing to greater awareness and enhanced understanding of the IP and informal economy linkages among policy makers. The evaluation will be participatory in nature and allow for the involvement of relevant stakeholders including the project team, senior managers, Member States, national IP offices and other parties as far as possible. Information will be gathered from a range sources using different research methods (predominantly interviews with stakeholders and documentary review) allowing for triangulation and cross-referencing of the data gathered.
3.1 Key Evaluation Questions The following table outlines the key evaluation questions and proposed methodology for evaluating against those questions. The methodology is organised on the basis of three key evaluation themes – Project Design and Management; Effectiveness; and Sustainability. Theme Key Questions Proposed Indicators Data Collection Information Sources Project Design and Management How appropriate was the initial project document as a guide for project implementation? Extent of appropriateness of Project Document Document review Interviews Documentation WIPO Secretariat How appropriate was the initial project document for assessment of results achieved? Extent of appropriateness of Project Document Document review Interviews Documentation WIPO Secretariat To what extent have other entities within the Secretariat contributed and enabled effective and efficient project implementation? Level of contribution of different entities Document review Interviews WIPO Secretariat To what extent have the identified in the initial project document materialized and/or been mitigated? Extent of risks arising and being mitigated Document review Interviews Documentation WIPO Secretariat How has the project responded to emerging trends, technologies and other external forces? Levels of flexibility and ability to respond change Document review Interviews Documentation WIPO Secretariat Member States To what extent have Member States been involved in the project design? Degree of involvement of Member States Document review Interviews Documentation WIPO Secretariat Member States
Facilitating start-ups Adaptation of SME and entrepreneurship policies for the informal economy Stimulating linkages between formal and informal actors, and the integration of the IE in formal sector value chains with a view to transferring skills to IE workers Efforts to enhance forward and backward linkages, including to the formal sector and public institutions Facilitating the assimilation of innovations created elsewhere by effectively channeling existing knowledge and technology Fostering access to technology and information Others potential interventions* Technology and Innovation indictors (ASTII) - however, data does not cover innovation activities by informal enterprises. A few initiatives (such as the Awethu Project) are proactively seeking for innovative potential in marginalized communities. Support schemes by DTI - the Youth Enterprise Development Strategy, and the Small Enterprises Development Agency (SEDA); business incubators and NGOs across the country, aim at facilitating start-ups. Programs or initiatives proactively seeking to integrate informal economy actors into formal value chains are scarce and much needed. City Informal Trading By-Laws aim to harmonize the relationship between informal and formal economic activities. The recently established Youth Enterprise Development Strategy (YEDS) seeks partnerships between government, the private sector and civil society to materialise its support to informal youth entrepreneurs. SEDA Technology Programme (STP), and technology transfer organizations (such as TUT Technology Station in Chemicals, Chemin and others) facilitate access of informal entrepreneurs to existing knowledge and technology. Other interventions, such as demand-side measures; prizes for informal entrepreneurs; improving IE actor organization; strengthening of intermediary organizations, etc., remain scarce and have been pointed out as critical in order to support the vast potential of informal entrepreneurship. 7) Intellectual property policies Needs assessment Overcoming the hurdles in accessing the IP system Awareness-raising and training on IP The Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC), is mandated by the Companies Act, 2008 (Act 71 of 2008) and is the custodian of the IP regulatory framework in Africa. The National Intellectual Property Management Office (NIPMO) established in 2011, aims to ensure that recipients of funding from a government funding agency assess,
Thermal processes and apparatus 33 189 21.4% Engines, pumps, turbines 21 110 20.2% Other special machines 31 159 19.9% IT methods for management 7 35 19.1% Analysis of biological materials 4 18 19.0% Civil engineering 36 166 18.6% Organic fine chemistry 23 107 18.5% Basic materials chemistry 23 90 16.6% Transport 35 135 16.4% Furniture, games 74 287 16.3% Other consumer goods 52 199 16.2% Medical technology 37 134 15.4% Food chemistry 6 21 15.0% Pharmaceuticals 40 135 14.3% Environmental technology 13 40 13.5% Macromolecular chemistry, polymers 28 58 8.4% Biotechnology 34 69 8.2% Source: WIPO IP Statistics Database. Patent data can be broadly categorized as complex or discrete technologies. Complex technologies are usually defined as those for which the resulting products or processes consist of numerous separately patentable elements and for which patent ownership is typically widespread. Discrete technologies, in turn, describe products or processes that consist of a single or relatively few patentable elements and for which patent ownership is more concentrated. For example, smartphones fall into the category of complex technologies, whereas pharmaceuticals are considered a discrete technology. The share of “complex” technology fields among all foreign-oriented patent families by Chinese residents has been growing between 1970-2009 making up a 75%-share of total patents abroad on average per annum since 2000 (see Figure 3.11). To the contrary, the share of “discrete” technologies has been shrinking. Figure 3.11. Distribution discrete versus complex technology fields, 1970-2009 Source: WIPO IP Statistics Database. The top ten technology fields of patents abroad vary according to the type of Chinese applicants (see Figures 3.12 – 3.15). For companies, “Digital communication”, “Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy”, and “Computer technology” are the most important technology fields in terms of volumes between 2005 and 2009 (see Figure 3.12). This is not surprising given that these are now the fastest-growing technology fields with Chinese companies competing with foreign companies (see Section 4 for the discussion on top patent applicants of Chinese origin). In terms of volume, and with a 25% cumulative share between 2005 and 2009,
APPENDIX III: List of persons Interviewed No. Name and function 1. Mr. Amr Abdelaziz Counsellor, Regional Bureau for Arab Countries, Development Sector, WIPO 2. Mr. Juan Antonio Toledo Barraza Senior Director, Regional Bureau for Latin America and the Caribbean, Development Sector, WIPO 3. Ms. Maria Amorim Pascoa Borher Deputy Director, Global Infrastructure Sector (now in field office Brazil), WIPO 4. Dr. Nagwa El-Shenawy Undersecretary for Information & Strategic Planning, Information Center Director, Ministry of Communication and Information Technology, 5 Mr. Sergio Escudero Head, International Affairs and Policy Department, National Institute of Industrial Property (INAPI), Chile 6. Mr. Carsten Fink Chief Economist, Project Manager, Economics and Statistics Division, WIPO 7. Mr. Georges Ghandour Senior Program Manager, DACD, WIPO 8. Ms. Dalila Director, Regional Bureau for Arab Countries, Development Sector, WIPO 9. Mr. Christian Helmers Department of Economics, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, California, USA 10. Mr. Albert Hu Professor, China Europe International Business School, Shanghai, China 11. Ms. Kristen Livshin Performance Analyst, Department of Program Planning and Finance, Program Performance and Budget Division, WIPO 12. Mr. Victor Guizar Lopez Counsellor, Regional Bureau for America and the Caribbean, Development Sector, WIPO 13. Mr. Geoffrey Onyeama Deputy Director General, Development Sector, WIPO 14. Mr. Sergio Paulino Assessor para Assuntos Econômicos – AECON, INPI - Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial, Brazil 15. Ms. Trivelli Lawyer, International Affairs and Policy Department, Chile 16. Mr. Julio Raffo Senior Economic Officer, Project Team, Economics and Statistics Division, WIPO 17. Ms. Martha Fernandez Rivas Counsellor, Regional Bureau for Latin America and the Caribbean, Development Sector, WIPO 18. Mr. Hao Zhou Head, Data Development Section, Project Team, Economics and Statistics Division, WIPO [Appendix IV follows]
NON-PERSONNEL RESOURCES BY COST CATEGORY (Swiss francs) Travel and Fellowships Contractual Services Total Activities Staff Missions Third-party Travel Publishing Individual Contractual Services Other Contractual Services Promote the sustainable of the research initiated in phase I 40,000 40,000 15,000 30,000 30,000 155,000 Extend the work to new countries and regions as well as new topics 75,000 75,000 25,000 45,000 50,000 270,000 Research symposium 55,000 5,000 60,000 Total 485,000
Provides an online searchable patent database on its patent office website - 8. Finland Provides an online searchable patent database on its patent office website - Patentscope (PCT national phase) INPADOC 9. France Provides an online searchable patent database on its patent office website . INPADOC 10. Germany No clear provision on standard of disclosure. Provides an online searchable patent database on its patent office website - Patentscope (PCT national phase) INPADOC 11. Greece Provides an online searchable patent database on its patent office website - INPADOC 12. Hungary No clear provision on standard of disclosure. Provides an online searchable patent database on its patent office website - Patentscope (PCT national phase) INPADOC 13. Iceland Article 8 of the Patent Act No. 17/1991 provides that the patent description shall be so clear as to enable a person skilled in the art to carry out the invention with the guidance of the description. There is no dedicated searchable patent database on its patent office website. 14. Ireland Section 19(1) of the Patents Act 1992 requires that a patent application shall disclose the invention to which it relates in a manner sufficiently clear and complete for it to be carried out by a person skilled in the art. There is no dedicated searchable patent database on its patent office website. INPADOC
(b) Four case studies conducted and documented (one per pilot country). Three pilot countries selected (in addition to Egypt) (a) Three countries selected (based on agreed selection criteria); and (b) Lead agencies/institutions appointed for country project implementation. Tourism stakeholders and national authorities identified (a) In each country, relevant tourism stakeholders identified in coordination with lead institutions. project plans approved Project implementation plans drafted (one per country). Tourism stakeholders and national authorities, including IP offices, sensitized In each country, two capacity building events organized to sensitize tourism stakeholders and strengthen the capacities of national authorities to provide sector-specific support to tourism-related economic activity through the use of IP. Higher awareness the academic community on the intersection between IP and tourism and the promotion of national and knowledge, traditions and culture for development (a) Information/awareness-raising materials produced (at least one video documentary); and (b) Teaching/training materials developed (at least one set) and integrated in curricula. Project Objectives Indicators of Success in Achieving Project Objective (Outcome Indicators) Create capacities for key tourism stakeholders, as well as for national/local authorities, including IP offices, of how to use IP tools and strategies to add value and diversify tourism-related economic activity, including activity related to the promotion of tourism, national and/or local knowledge, traditions and culture. National authorities in all four countries have developed structures to provide advisory services on IP and tourism for growth and national development. Tourism stakeholders in at least two countries have started/developed plans to use IP tools and strategies to strengthen their competitiveness and promote tourism, national and/or local knowledge, traditions and culture. Raise awareness of the academic community of the intersection between IP and tourism in the framework of growth and development policies with a view to developing teaching materials and promoting the inclusion of specialized curricula in tourism management schools and in national IP academies. Up to two schools of Tourism Management and at least one national IP Academy have adopted curricula and educational and training materials developed by the project.
Person Specification – Electrician Essential Desirable Method of Assessment Qualification Electrical Apprenticeship City and Guilds or NVQ Level or equivalent. BS 7671, IEE Wiring Regulations - 17th Edition City and Guilds 2391 /2392- Inspection and Testing or the ability to notify domestic installation works. Asbestos Awareness Application Form Selection Process Pre-employment checks Experience Previously experience of working in domestic buildings Previously employed in a domestic repairs and maintenance environment Relevant Electrical experience Experience of using PDA wireless technology/laptops Being able to work with no direct supervision Application Form Selection Process Pre-employment checks Skills/knowledge Knowledge of health and safety regulations Customer care skills IT skills Good communication skills Application Form Selection Process Pre-employment checks
Enter into a formal memorandum of understanding (MOU) with each of the four selected pilot institutions that would be tailored to their respective circumstances and particular needs. 2.4. Risks and Mitigation Strategies In the course of the project implementation, the following risks may be envisaged: Difficulties to organize continuous training for a busy judiciary. A key mitigation measure to counter such is to ensure having the full engagement and endorsement of the judicial training institute and/or the relevant authorities at all phases of the project; Conditions in a selected pilot country may impede the project, in which case due discussions should be pursued. Should such discussions be unsuccessful, the project in the country may be suspended or postponed; The use of Information and Communication Technology (ICTs) may face limitations that exist in developing and least developed countries, such as absence or low-speed Internet. A key mitigation measure to counter this high risk would be to ensure the print-publishing of the Judges IP Toolkit. 3. REVIEW AND EVALUATION 3.1. Project Review Schedule (a) Each component of the project, as outlined in 2.3 above, will be regularly monitored for progress against agreed milestones/time table and identification and elimination/mitigation of known and emerging risks and use of emerging opportunities for synergies to improve cost-effectiveness and quality of its components/deliverables. (b) A yearly (or mid-term) progress cum self-evaluation report will be presented for the consideration of the CDIP. Independent Evaluation of the Project In addition to the self-evaluation by each participating judicial institution and evaluation by WIPO, an independent evaluation of the project will be undertaken and its report submitted to the CDIP. Project Outputs Indicators of Successful Completion (Output Indicators) A study on ongoing IPR education and existing good practices completed; and Preliminary analysis made. Customized IP training modules for judges and magistrates for each pilot project. Modules completed and endorsed by the relevant national or regional authorities. At least one training session (on-line, blended or on-site) organized in cooperation with each beneficiary training institute based on the newly developed modules, curricula and training
Organizing, testing and evaluating training courses Two-day to three-day training sessions On-line training session 20 000 20 000 20 000 60 000 Establishing networks among judicial training institutes 10 000 10 000 Self-evaluation of the project - Independent evaluation of the project 10 000 10 000 Total 60 000 60 000 70 000 190 000 120 000 500 000 [End of Annex and of document]
The issue of Coordination Mechanism as such will mainly be debated within the CDIP, upon recommendation by the General Assembly. (African Group) Committees shall bear in mind that the Coordination Mechanism is to be implemented in a pragmatic way and ensure that discussions on this matter do not prevent such Committees from accomplishing their substantive work. (Group B) Committees shall bear in mind that the Coordination Mechanism is to be implemented in a pragmatic way and ensure that discussions on this matter do not prevent such Committees from accomplishing their substantive work, in line with the Development Agenda recommendations. (African Group)
Person Specification – Plumber Apprentice Essential Desirable Method of Assessment Qualification 4 GCSE’s (Graded A-C) or equivalent including Maths, English Language or Literature and Science Application Form Selection Process Pre-employment checks Experience Previous projects where initiative was demonstrated. Application Form Selection Process Pre-employment checks Skills/knowledge Basic knowledge of the role of plumber/ gas fitter. Good communication skills. Good numeric skills. Ability to work as a team member. IT skills Knowledge of IT systems. Application Form Selection Process Pre-employment checks Personal Qualities Ability to form effective working relationships with colleagues. Good organisational skills. Reliable and punctual. Able to work on own initiative. Flexibility within the role in delivering the service. Application Form Selection Process Pre-employment checks
Box 6 Summary of Survey Feedback on degree of satisfaction regarding implementation vis-à-vis expectations Number of respondents Percentage of who agreed from high to moderate degree- that has met Percentage of respondents who did not agree that has met expectations Percentage of respondents with no opinion Geneva Representatives 109 65.7 13.6 20.7 IP Offices 138 69.3 15.8 14.8 NGOs/ IGOs that were observers to the CDIP 27 47 36.3 16.7 Direct Beneficiaries of the projects; include a long range of actors, depending of the project (individuals, IP Office focal point for the project, representatives of that benefited from the projects, 99 62.8 16.3 20.9
What is your sexual orientation? Please tick the appropriate box: Heterosexual □ Gay □ Lesbian □ Bisexual □ What is your ethnicity? Please tick the appropriate box: White English □ Northern Irish □ Welsh □ British □ Scottish □ Irish □ Any other white background (please state) □ Traveller Black Gypsy / Roma □ Black or Black British □ Traveller of Irish Descent □ Caribbean □ Other member of the travelling community □ African □ Asian Mixed Asian or Asian British □ White and Black Caribbean □ Indian □ White and Black African □ Pakistani □ White and Asian Any □ Bangladeshi □ other mixed background (please state) □ Chinese □
The exit strategy for Morocco Kick-off events Agenda/program kick-off event in Argentina Agenda/program kick-off event in Morocco Agenda/program capacity building conference in Casablanca (October 27, 2015) Selection of SMEs Report on the selection of companies Training material The tool “5 Steps Strategic Design Protection” Promotional material Brochure “Unlocking Countries’ Design Potential WIPO Pilot Project on Intellectual Property and Design Management for Business Development” Video Argentina on the DiseñAr program: Video Morocco on the Namadij program: Flyer on the DiseñAr program on the Namadij program Closing events and case studies Agenda of closing in Argentina Agenda of closing event in Morocco Case studies presented case studies to Member States at a lunch-time side event to the 34th session of the SCT, on November 17, 2017. [End of Appendix IV and of document]
Ahmad RIFADI (Mr.), Head, Section of Legal Advocation and Litigation, Directorate of Copyrights and Industrial Designs, Ministry of Law and Human Rights, Jakarta Surahno SURAHNO (Mr.), Head, General Affairs Division, Secretariat of Directorate General of Intellectual Property, Ministry of Law and Human Rights, Jakarta Mien USIHEN (Ms.), Head, National Planning Center, National Law Development Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights, Jakarta Irni YUSLIANTI (Ms.), Head, International Organization Cooperation Section, Directorate of Cooperation and Empowerment of Intellectual Property, Ministry of Law and Human Rights, Jakarta Selatan Y. Ambeg PARAMARTA (Mr.), Senior Advisor, Ministry of Law and Human Rights, Jakarta F. Haru TAMTOMO (Mr.), Senior Advisor, Ministry of Law and Rights, Jakarta Retno KUSUMA DEWI (Ms.), Senior Staff Officer, Legislation, Institution and Bureaucratic Reformation Sub-Division, Secretariat of Directorate General of Intellectual Property, Ministry of Law and Human Rights, Jakarta Bayu SANTOSO (Mr.), Official, Secretariat of Directorate General of Intellectual Property, Ministry of Law and Human Rights, Jakarta Tyas Dian ANGGRAENI (Ms.), National Law Development Agency, Law Planning Center, Ministry of Law And Human Rights, Jakarta IRAN (RÉPUBLIQUE ISLAMIQUE D’)/IRAN (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF) Yousef NOURIKIA (Mr.), Legal officer, Legal Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Tehran Reza DEHGHANI (Mr.), First Secretary, Permanent Mission, Geneva IRLANDE/IRELAND Michael GAFFEY (Mr.), Ambassador, Permanent Representative, Permanent Mission, Geneva Declan MORRIN (Mr.), Director, Intellectual Property, Department of Business, Enterprise and Innovation, Dublin ISRAËL/ISRAEL Yehudit GALILEE METZER (Ms.), Counsellor, Permanent Mission, Geneva Dan ZAFRIR (Ms.), Advisor, Permanent Mission, Geneva
What is your sexual orientation? Please tick the appropriate box: Heterosexual □ Gay □ Lesbian □ Bisexual □ What is your ethnicity? Please tick the appropriate box: White English □ Northern Irish □ □ British □ Scottish □ Irish □ Any other white background (please state) □ Traveller Black Gypsy / Roma □ Black or Black British □ Traveller of Descent □ Caribbean □ Other member of the travelling community □ African □ Asian Mixed Asian or Asian British □ White and Black Caribbean □ Indian □ White and Black African □ Pakistani □ White and Asian Any □ Bangladeshi □ mixed background (please state) □ Chinese □
Any Asian background (please state) □ Any other ethnic group (please state) □ How you describe your religion? Christian □ Muslim □ Hindu □ Sikh □ Jewish □ Buddhist □ I am not religious □ Other (please state) □ Are you the primary carer for someone? Yes □ No □ If yes, do you care for? A child under 18 years of age □ A disabled Child under 18 years of age □ A disabled adult □ Another vulnerable person □
E CDIP/21/8 ORIGINAL: English DATE: march 14, 2018 Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP) Twenty-First Session Geneva, May 14 to 18, 2018 Compilation of Member State inputs on issues to be addressed under the agenda item “intellectual property and development” prepared by the Secretariat The WIPO General Assembly (GA) at its 49th session, held in October 2017, took a decision which inter alia, requested to “add new agenda item to the CDIP agenda, named IP and development to discuss IP and development-related issues as agreed by the Committee, as well as those decided by the GA”. The Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP) at its 20th session, while discussing the issues to be addressed under the said item decided that “interested Member States may submit their proposals in writing to the Secretariat for discussion at the next session. The Member State submissions should reach the Secretariat by the end of February 2018. The Secretariat will compile the inputs received and submit them to the twenty-first session of the Committee”. Accordingly, the annexes to this document contain four submissions (Group B, the delegations of Mexico, Brazil and the Russian Federation) received by the Secretariat on the above-mentioned subject. The Committee is requested to consider the information contained in the annexes to the present document. [Annexes follow]
which the analysis of IP-related areas of the value chain of a selected culinary tradition is presented. could be used for the promotion of the selected culinary tradition throughout its value chain. Organization of an international seminar in which the experiences and conclusions of the project in each pilot country are presented. Presence of relevant stakeholders in the IP and gastronomic tourism sector of different countries. Preparation of a compilation of the main outputs and conclusions reached in the different pilot countries. Relevant identification of the conclusions reached as a result of the different research activities of the project. Project Objectives Indicators of Success in Achieving Project Objective (Outcome Indicators) 1. Build the capacity of economic operators involved in gastronomic tourism and of national authorities, including IP offices, to use and leverage IP tools and strategies to add value that differentiates their products and services, and to diversify their economic activities while respecting local traditions and culture. Number of economic operators in the gastronomic tourism sector that, the project, have started plans to use and leverage IP tools to add value to their product or service. Number and relevance of capacity building activities conducted by national authorities, including IP offices, to provide advisory services on the use of IP tools in the gastronomic tourism sector. 2. Raise awareness on the contributions that the use of IP can take to the gastronomic tourism activities. Percentage of participants to the round tables and seminars that reported a better understanding of the potential contributions of IP for the gastronomic tourism sector. Level of access and use of the compilation of main outputs and conclusions of the projects by other interested Member States and stakeholders.
and arbitration for lawyers and officials Dialogue with financial institutions and investors 10 000 10 000 Video conferences between ICT hubs in six beneficiary countries 10 000 10 000 IP awareness material for computer science students 5 000 5 000 10 000 Mentoring program 15 000 15 000 10 000 40 000 IP toolbox for software sector 10 000 20 000 50 000 Online platform 20 000 20 000 Final workshop in three of the six beneficiary countries 10 000 10 000 20 000 workshop in three of the six beneficiary countries 10 000 10 000 20 000 coordination meeting with national focal points 5 000 15 000 20 000 Project self-evaluation 15 000 15 000 40 000 50 000 15 000 96 000 60 000 261 000 * Subject to approval by the Program and Budget Committee. IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE (b) Year 2019* Activity Quarters 2019 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Selection of beneficiary countries x Scoping study x x