Revenue impact from the existing and proposed tariff for different slabs is compared. Table No: 8.8 Particulars tariff Consumers Sales Fixed in Crs. Energy Charges in Crores Total Revenue in Crs. ARR Revenue with existing tariff Diff. in 0-30(all units) Rs.35 for 1st kW and Rs.45 for kW 1241917 181.87 49.10 49.10 2.70 2857.41 538 31-50 (all units) 672705 363.74 0.00 127.31 127.31 3.50 51-200 (all units) 2690821 3455.53 0.00 1658.65 1658.65 4.80 201-300 (all units) 362226 1030.60 0.00 556.52 556.52 5.40 301-400 (all 103493 363.74 0.00 209.15 209.15 5.75 401-500 (all units) 51747 181.87 0.00 108.21 108.21 5.95 > 500 (all units) 484.99 0.00 295.84 295.84 6.10 Total 5174655 6062 391 3005 3395 2857.41 538.00 Voltage class wise tariff for HT- consumers Introduction: Government distribution companies have lost the opportunity of competition in the market consequent to open access. Existing Acts, Regulations favors competition. These relaxed laws have allowed the generators to cherry pick consumers from distribution companies. This has resulted in losing the competence of competition. On these grounds reduction in variable charges for the HT consumers and increase in demand charges by introducing voltage class wise tariff are proposed. DATA.
to a maximum of 30 paise per unit 25% of energy charges was being levied as surcharge There is no surcharge for not fixing capacitors This is the prime factor which mooted for KVAH billing For Ferro industries, 50 unit per KVA is the deemed energy charges There is no deemed Energy charges This is one of the reason for opting alternative billing method by Ferro consumers of AP One suitable capacity transformer for one installation and metering done at the HT side of the transformer Multiple consumers are connected to single transformer and metering is being done on LT side of Transformer This has resulted in Virtual HT for LT installations. Transformation loss is loaded to the consumer. Interference in metering equipment, theft of energy by these consumers are eliminated in AP 80% of the Contract Demand is the minimum billing demand 75% of Contract Demand is the minimum billing demand This is also reason for mooting the kVAh billing method. This also increases the realization rate in AP With the situation prevailing in the State of Karnataka, BESCOM placed following facts before the Hon’ble Commission for proposing KVAh billing. Out of the total consumption, 36% of energy is sold to HT/EHT consumers, 24% of energy is sold to IP category and 23% of energy is consumed by LT-domestic consumers. The existing meters support immediate conversion from KWh billing to KVAh billing. In this background, BESCOM propose KVAh billing for all HT installations in 1st phase and for and Commercial installations having connected load of 20HP and above in the subsequent phase. BESCOM does not intend to take benefit from shifting of KWH billing to KVAh billing but proposes for tariff neutralization. KVAh billing requires some recapitalization: Since from the invention of electricity, kW and kWh are fixed as measurement of electricity demand and electricity consumption respectively. Drastic technology developments have taken place in electricity metering but kWh& kW remained as valid units for electricity energy &demand measuring.