Dealing with fuel spillage incidents and reports to the Environment Agency if appropriate. All Cambridge Airport Personnel Aerodrome Safety Accountability Cambridge Airport Personnel are accountable to their Department Manager for providing services suitable for the continuance of airport activities for their operational role. Aerodrome Safety Responsibilities All Cambridge Airport personnel have the following safety responsibilities: Carry out their duties in compliance with company operating procedures and/or CAA regulations Comply with relevant safety requirements and procedures outlined in: Cambridge International Airport Aerodrome Manual Other authorized corporate manuals, instructions, and notices system safety measures as required by safety management procedures and instructions Advise the safety manager of any safety occurrence or system failure, and identify/report any situation of potential risk or concern affecting system safety via one of the following Report directly to your immediate supervisor/manager or a safety manager Via team meetings Submitting the required incident/accident report Supporting safety audits as and when they Supporting safety investigations as and when they occur By reading this Aerodrome Manual it is deemed that Cambridge Airport personnel confirm their acceptance of the above aerodrome safely responsibilities
occur at CIA once in a few years on average. Reported in the industry occasionally unlikely to occur during the programme or activity 10-7 per hour) 4 Occasional About once a month. Known to occur at CIA about 10 times per year on average Can be expected to occur at least once during the programme or activity 1 in 10 (10-3 to 10-5 per hour) 5 Frequent About once a week. Known to occur at CIA about 50 times per year on average Almost certain to occur several times during the programme or activity 1 in 2 (1 to 10-3 per hour) Figure 5: Risk Probability Matrix Safety Risk Severity Safety risk severity is defined as the extent of harm that might reasonably occur as a consequence or outcome of the identified hazard. The severity assessment can be based upon: Fatalities/injury. How many lives may be lost (employees, passengers, bystanders and the general public)? Damage. What is the likely extent of aircraft, property or equipment damage? The severity assessment should consider all possible consequences related to an unsafe condition or object, taking into account the worst foreseeable situation. Risk Severity Level Severity Qualitative Severity Description Health and Safety Operational Safety Security Environment Financial Reputation and Legal 1 Negligible first aid treatment (e.g. Minor cut/abrasions) causing minimal work interruption Nuisance or distraction. Procedure violated with no adverse effect. Slightly reduced margin of safety but controlled within existing procedures. Minor breach of regulations No Effect Less than £100K No Implication
2 Minor Injury requiring first aid treatment causing inability to continue with current work activity for 7 days or less Light damage to an aircraft (visible but no adverse effect). Light or moderate damage to vehicles (unfit for use). term disruption to operations or some facilities (up to an hour). Reportable breach of regulations Minor Effect Between £100K and £1 million Limited Localised Implication 3 Major Medical treatment required. RIDDOR over 7 day lost time injuries Moderate to serious damage to an aircraft, unserviceable for repairs. Vehicle, equipment or property damage. Out of service with costly repairs Significant operating limitations and significant disruption, several hours. Demanding workload to key personnel, potential for loss of attention. Prosecution Contained Effect Between £1 million and £3 million Regional Implication 4 Hazardous Permanent or life changing injuries. RIDDOR major injuries Aircraft damaged requiring prolonged major repairs. Vehicle damaged beyond repair. Loss or relocation of facility damaged beyond use (several days or weeks). Very high workload to key personnel, with likely impairment of performance or accuracy. Short airport closure Major effect Between £3 million and £6 million National Implication 5 Single or Multiple Deaths Aircraft destroyed. Vehicle or equipment destroyed. Major fire or explosion with substantial loss of facilities. Long airport closure Massive Effect Greater than £6 million International Implication Figure 6: Risk Severity Matrix Safety Risk Tolerability A 5x5 risk matrix is used to assess the results of the risk probability and severity assessment. Risk Index Matrix (Severity x Likelihood) Likelihood Severity 5 - Catastrophic 4 - Hazardous 3 - 2 - Minor 1 - Negligible 5 – Frequent Unacceptable Unacceptable Unacceptable Review Review 4 – Occasional Unacceptable Unacceptable Review Review Acceptable 3 – Remote Unacceptable Review Review Review Acceptable 2 – Improbable Review Review Review Acceptable Acceptable
Object (m) Alpha (from RWY to B) D Taxiway 521235.64N 0001056.39E 20 42/R/C/X/T 37 Concrete / Asphalt Alpha (from B to Customs Apron) B Taxiway 15 14/R/C/X/T 20 Asphalt (from Customs Apron to Apron 2) A Taxiway 15 14/R/C/X/T 15.5 Asphalt Bravo D Taxiway 521233.70N 0001051.89E 20 15/R/C/X/T 37 Asphalt Charlie (From RWY to A) C Taxiway 521226.75N 0001038.06E 15 24/F/C/X/U 26 Asphalt Charlie (from Compass Base to Tower) B Taxiway 15 11/R/C/W/T 20 Concrete / Asphalt Charlie (from Tower to Apron 2 B Taxilane 15 22/R/C/W/T 22.5 Concrete Delta E Taxiway 521214.90N 0001015.42E 23 50/R/C/W/T 43.5 Concrete Juliet A Taxiway - 7.5 - - Grass Lima A Taxiway - 7.5 - - Grass Mike A Taxiway - 7.5 - - Uniform A Taxiway - 7.5 - - Grass Victor A Taxiway - 7.5 - - Grass Aprons Designation Surface PCN Remarks 1 Asphalt 14/F/C/X/T Only aircraft accessing Hangar 1 are permitted in this area unless previously authorised by Airport Operations. 2 Concrete 22/R/C/W/T -
by the letters L and R 8 Longitudinal slopes on runway 05/23 exceed the 1:80 maximum Longitudinal slopes (first and last quarters) on runway 05/23 exceed the 1:125 required Longitudinal changes on Runway 05/23 exceed the 1.5% maximum Longitudinal slope of three transitional curves on runway 05/23 fall below the minimum curve of 30,000m as required Distance between slope changes is not compliant The transverse on one side of runway 05/23 does not meet the minimum crossfall of less than 1% as required CAP 168, Chapter 3, Para 3.3.2 CAP 168, Chapter 3, Para 3.3.3 CAP 168, Chapter 3, Para 3.3.5 CAP 168, Chapter 3, Para 3.3.6(a) CAP 168, Chapter 3, Para 3.3.2