zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Climate Technologies Leeton Eisteddfod Highland Dancing ENTRY FORM Mail Entries to: DANCER NAME: Karen Garwood Address: 336 Murrami Rd Phone/Mobile: Stanbridge NSW 2705 Email: M:0428559564 Registration Number: E: kgarwood27@gmail.com Level: DOB & Age: Teacher: DANCE Section Price Cost Pas de Basque $6.00 Pas de Basque & HC $6.00 Highland Fling $6.00 Sword Dance $6.00 Sean Truibhas $6.00 Flora McDonald $6.00 Scottish Lilt $6.00 Highland Laddie $6.00 Sailors Hornpipe $6.00 Irish Jig $6.00 Blue Bonnets $6.00 Village Maid $6.00 Beginners/Novice TROPHY Fling $8.00 Intermediate TROPHY Lilt $8.00 Premier 13yrs&under Trophy Lilt $8.00 Premier 14&15 yrs TROPHY Lilt $8.00 Premier 16 yrs& over Trophy Lilt $8.00 Choreography $5.00 Group Name Administration Fee $2.00 TOTAL Cheques should be made payable to the: Leeton Eisteddfod Society Payments details for Direct Deposit: BSB: 802097 Account NO: 675836 A/C Name: Leeton Highland Dancing REF: Please use "DANCER'S NAME." Late entries may not appear in the program. I agree to the use of my child's photograph (under 18)/my photograph (over 18) in Highland Dancing publications and local newspapers. Signed_________________________________________Date______________ NSW15/2016 - conducted under the rules of the SOBHD and ABHDI as set out by the NSWSCHDI.
Worksheet for 2017 Breakthrough Goals Passionate Worship Average weekly worship attendance for all worship services Radical Hospitality Total professions of faith for year Total baptisms for year Intentional Faith Development Average number small groups weekly Average number attendees in all small groups weekly Percentage of weekly worship attendees in small groups Risk-Taking Mission & Service Average number members in mission/outreach each week Extravagant Generosity Average weekly giving toward annual budget Percentage paid towards conference and district apportionments Additional giving: Missions Fundraisers in support of annual budget Capital Memorials, endowments, bequests Advance Specials Comments/Clarifications Additional data categories you would find helpful:
CLASSROOM TEACHERS The following are the of the teachers and their room numbers: Primary Grades 118– Ms. Moe – ECE – Full Day 121 – Ms. Chitwood – ECE-Head Start – Full Day 120 – Ms. Landy – Kindergarten – Full Day 119 – Ms. Gentry – Kindergarten – Full Day 122 – Ms. Huff – 1st Grade 2nd Grade – Two individual classes of students 125 – Ms. Keleshian - 2nd 123 – Ms. Lutz -2nd grade 3rd Grade Platooning Classes: 115 – Mr. Keatinge – 3rd grade (morning for literacy and social studies) 114 – Ms. Ortega – 3rd grade (afternoon for math/science) 4/5 Grades Platooning Classes: 104 – Ms. Barber – 4/5 (social studies/science/non-fiction literacy) 209 – Ms. Benjamin – 4/5 (math) 124 – Ms. Johnson – 4/5 (fiction literacy ) Middle School Platooning Classes: 206 – Mr. Ritter – Literacy– Grades 6, 7 & 8 205 – Ms. Gregory – Social Studies/Science - Grades 6, 7 & 8 207 – Mr. Sandlin - Math – Grades 6, 7 & 8 HOMEROOM TEACHERS FOR 2nd-8th 2nd Grade: Ms. Lutz 2nd Grade: Ms. Keleshian 3rd Grade: Mr. Keatinge 3rd Grade: Ms. Ortega 4th Ms. Johnson 4th/5th Benjamin 5th Barber 6th Mr. Ritter 7th Grade: Ms. Gregory 8th Grade: Mr. Sandlin
2016 PENNSYLVANIA SENATE ELECTIONS District 1 – South Philadelphia Democrat – Farnese (incumbent) Republican – None District 3 – Central Philadelphia Democrat – Shariff Street - Republican – None District 5 – Northeast Philadelphia Democrat – John Sabatina (incumbent) - Republican – Ross Feinberg - District 7 – West Philadelphia, Southeast Montgomery County Democrat – Vincent Hughes (incumbent) - Republican – None District 9 – Western Delaware and Eastern Chester Counties Democrat – Molloy - Republican – Tom Killion (incumbent) - District 11 – Central Berks County Democrat – Judy Schwank (incumbent) - Republican – Judy Schwank (incumbent) District 13 – Southern Lancaster County Democrat – Greg Paulson - Republican – Scott Martin - District 15 – and Central Dauphin and and all of Perry Counties Democrat – Rob Teplitz (incumbent) - Republican – John DiSanto -
District 17 – Southern Montgomery and Northern Delaware Counties Democrat – Daylin Leach (incumbent) - Republican – Brian Gondek - District 19 – Western and Central Chester County Democrat – Andrew Dinniman (incumbent) - Republican – Jack London - District 21 – of Butler, Clarion, Forest, Venango, and Warren Counties Democrat – None Republican – Scott Hutchinson (incumbent) District 23 – Parts of Bradford, Lycoming, Sullivan, Susquehanna, and Union Counties Democrat – None Republican – Gene Yaw (incumbent) - District 25 – Parts of Cameron, Clinton, Elk, Jefferson, McKean, Potter, and Tioga Counties Democrat – Jerri Buchanan - Republican – Joe Scarnati (incumbent) District 27 – Parts of Columbia, Luzerne, Montour, Northumberland, and Snyder Counties Democrat – None Republican – John Gordner (incumbent) District 29 – Northern Berks and all of Schuylkill Counties Democrat – None Republican – David Argall (incumbent) District 31 – Eastern Cumberland and Northwestern York Counties Democrat – John Bosha - Republican – Mike Regan - District 33 – of Adams, Franklin, and York Counties Democrat – None
Republican – Richard Alloway (incumbent) District 35 – Bedford, Cambria, and most of Clearfield Counties Democrat – Ed Cernic, Jr. - Republican – Wayne Langerholc - District 37 – Southwestern Allegheny County and a small part of Washington County Democrat – Ed Eichenlaub - Republican – Guy Reschenthaler (incumbent) - District 39 – Most of Westmoreland County Democrat – Kim Ward (incumbent) Republican – Kim Ward (incumbent) District 41 – Parts of Armstrong, Butler, Indiana, and Westmoreland Counties Democrat – Tony DeLoreto - Republican – Don White (incumbent) - District 43 – East Central Allegheny County Democrat – Jay Costa (incumbent) Republican – None District 45 – Eastern Allegheny and Northwestern Westmoreland Counties Democrat – Jim Brewster (incumbent) Republican – None District 47 – Parts of Beaver, Butler, and Lawrence Counties Democrat – None Republican – Elder Vogel (incumbent) District 49 – Most of Erie County Democrat – Sean Wiley (incumbent) - Republican – Dan Laughlin -
25 Portugal: Freedom Day (Dia da Liberdade) 26 27 Slovenia: Day of Uprising Against Occupation (Dan upora proti okupatorju) 28 29 30 May 2016 June ► Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun 1 Labour Day 2 UK: Early May Bank Holiday 3 Poland: Constitution Day (Trzeciego Maja) 4 Latvia: Restoration of Independence day (Latvijas Republikas Neatkarības atjaunošanas diena) 5 Ascension Day 6 Bulgaria: St George's (Гергьовден, ден на храбростта и Българската армия) 7 8 Slovakia: Day of Victory over Fascism (Víťazstva nad fašizmom) 9 Europe Day 10 11 12 13 14 15 Netherlands: Pentecost (Pinksteren) 16 Whit Monday 17 Day Against Homophobia 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Bulgaria: St Cyril and Methodius Day (Ден на българската просвета и култура и на славянската писменост) 25 26 27 28 29 30 UK: Spring Bank Holiday 31 June 2016 July ► Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun 1 2 Italy: Republic Day (Festa della Repubblica) 3 4 5 Denmark: Constitution Day of Denmark (Danmark Grundlovsdag)
6 Ireland: June Holiday (Lá Saoire i mí Mheitheamh) 7 Malta: 7th of June (Sette Giugno) 8 9 10 Portugal: Portugal Day (Dia de Portugal) 11 12 13 14 World Blood Donor Day 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Croatia: Anti-Fascist Struggle Day (Dan antifašističke borbe) 23 Luxembourg: National Holiday / Sovereign's birthday 24 Latvia: Midsummer Day (Jāņi) 25 Croatia: Statehood Day (Dan državnosti) 26 27 28 29 Malta: Feast of St Peter & St Paul 30 July 2016 August ► Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun 1 2 3 4 5 6 Czech Rep: Jan Hus Day (Upálení mistra Jana Husa) 7 8 9 10 11 12 N. Ireland: Batlle of Boyne / Orangemen's Day 13 14 France: Bastille Day (Fête Nationale / Le quatorze juillet) 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Belgium: Belgian National Day (Fête nationale) 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 August 2016 September ► Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
21 22 23 24 25 Day Against Domestic Violence 26 27 28 29 30 Scotland: St. Andrew's Day December 2016 January ► Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun 1 Portugal: Restoration of Independence (Restauração da Independência) 2 3 4 5 6 Spain: Constitution Day (Día de la Constitución) 7 8 Spain: Immaculate Conception (Día de la Inmaculada Concepcion) 9 10 11 12 13 Malta: Republic Day (Jum 14 15 16 17 18 Migrants Day 19 20 21 22 23 24 Christmas Eve 25 Christmas Day 26 days 27 End-of-Year days 28 days 29 End-of-Year days 30 days 31 End-of-Year days EU Holidays for 2016. Holiday list includes EU member country national days. Courtesy of Jan 1 Deň vzniku Slovenskej republiky (Slovakia) Jan 1 New Year's Jan 6 Heilige Drei Könige (Germany) Jan 6 Trettondedag Jul (Sweden) Jan 24 Unirea Principatelor Române/Mica Unire (Romania) Jan 27 Holocaust Remembrance Day Jan 28 Data Protection Day Feb 8 Prešernov dan Feb 10 Nawfraġju ta' San Pawl (Malta) Feb 16 Lietuvos valstybės atkūrimo diena (Lithuania) Feb 24 Eesti Vabariigi aastapäev (Estonia) Mar 3 Ден на Освобождението на България от османско иго (Bulgaria) Mar 11 Lietuvos nepriklausomybės atkūrimo diena (Lithuania) Mar 14 Καθαρά Δευτέρα (Cyprus) Mar 15 Nemzeti ünnep (Hungary) Mar 17 Lá Fhéile Pádraig (Republic of Ireland) Mar 17 St. Patrick's Day (Northern Ireland) Mar 19 San Ġużepp (Malta)
PhD Welcome Programme (For international students) Time Events Venue/Gathering Place Thursday, 8th September 09:00-11:30 13:30-16:30 University Registration¹ TB 221 Friday, 9th September 09:00-9:45 Orientation Ceremony Auditorium 10:00-11:00 Introduction to Information services SSB226/SSB415/SSB418/SSB119 11:00-12:00 Campus Tour (lead by PhD student) Gather in front of Auditorium 13:30 – 14:30 Introduction to Graduate School and Faculty Services TB 102 15:00-15:30 Introduction to Living Services Auditorium 15:30-16:00 Safety and Security & Laws and Regulations Auditorium 16:15-17:45 Introduction to Library Resources, Moodle and EndNote SSB415 Saturday, 10th September 09:00-09:30 Briefing on Visa/Insurance Auditorium 09:30-09:45 Work Experience Opportunities Auditorium 09:45-10:00 Break 10:00-10:15 Language Learning Opportunities at UNNC Auditorium 10:15-10:45 Briefing from Academic Services Office and Faculty Office Auditorium 13:30-14:30 Introduction to Academic Literacy Development Centre Audi 15:00-16:00 Residence Permit Application Documents Collection2 SSB329 18:00-19:00 Part 1: Academic Acculturation Lecture TB 118 Sunday, 11th September 09:00-17:00 City Tour* (Please prepare 50RMB for lunch) Gather at Gate 3 at 9:00 Monday, 12th September 07:00-11:00 Health (bus to downtown)3 (GROUP 1) Gather at Gate 3 at 7:00
18.14 SF/box 72 boxes/pallet 1,306.08 SF/pallet 4.2 mm thickness, no padding needed Limited 25 year residential warranty / 5 year light commercial warranty BEVELED EDGE LAMINATE WITH WAXED EDGES FOR ADDED PROTECTION 20.24 SF/box 56 boxes/pallet 1,133.71 SF/pallet 5” wide 8.3 mm thick with 2 mm attached padding (10.3 mm total thickness) Limited 25 year residential warranty Matching T-Mould and Reducer available TRADITIONAL LAMINATE FLOORING WITH A MEDIUM EMBOSSED FINISH
6mil Polyurethane Moisture Barrier Underlayment 2mm 3-in-1 Floor Underlayment with Foil Backing Pine Tongue & Groove For Flooring, Walls and Ceilings Comes in sizes: 1x4 1x6 1x8 with lengths varying between 6’ – 18’ Most boards are reversible with styles that include: V groove in center V groove on edge Bead in center Flat sides 50 Sheets per Bundle Quality Material MADE EXCLUSIVELY FOR DAVE LYLES WHOLESALE!
CERTIFICATIONS FOR 50 JURISDICTIONS The following additional departments of corrections were certified when the new Federal Guidelines were issued April 7, 1999: Colorado, Delaware (later decertified), Florida, Hawaii, Indiana, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Montana, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio (later decertified and then re-certified), Red River County (TX) (later decertified), South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas Youth Commission (later included in the Texas Oversight Authority), Texas Oversight Authority, Utah County, Vermont, Virginia, Washington State Jail Industries Board (later de-certified), Wisconsin, and Wyoming. As of 6/1/2016 were 46 PIECP Certificate Holders: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Denver County (CO), Colorado, Connecticut, Federal Prison Industries, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan Hennepin County (MN), Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, Strafford County (NH), Belknap County (NH), New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas Oversight Authority, Utah County (UT), Utah, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. BJA monitors the performance of PIECP CACs to ensure that they operate in full compliance with all legislative and administrative program requirements. Under a grant to the NCIA, it conducts regular, on-site and desk reviews of all active PIECP CACs. BJA responds to matters involving possible non-compliance by taking appropriate remedial action and proposing a corrective action plan. MANDATORY CRITERIA FOR PROGRAM PARTICIPATION To become eligible for BJA certification, an applicant department of corrections must comply with nine specified statutory requirements. ELIGIBILITY BJA has discretion with respect to eligibility. A state, a county, or a combination of state and local departments of correction and youth authorities may apply for certification. INMATE WAGES The PIECP statute requires that inmate workers be paid “at a rate which is not less than that paid for work of a similar nature in the locality in which the work is performed.” Wage determinations are to be established by the state department of economic security (DES) agencies and must be updated on an annual basis.
the amount of pay received by similarly [[Page 17010]] situated non-inmate workers. In deriving the appropriate PIECP wage, 18 U.S.C. 1761(c)(2) does not allow other cost variables to be taken into consideration, such as unique expenses incurred as a result of undertaking production within the prison environment. (B) Prevailing wage verification must be obtained by the appropriate state agency which determines wage rates (usually the Department of Economic Security). (C) When making PIECP prevailing wage verifications and annual re- verifications, the responsible state agency should recommend the utilization of a wage scale which will not result in the displacement of non-inmate workers performing similar work in the relevant locality. (D) The PIECP prevailing wage must be
Adults Stayers and Leavers Who Maintained or Increased Income 50% Adults obtaining or maintaining non-cash mainstream benefits 56% Average Length of Stay in Program Average LOS <180 days Proposed Permanent Supportive Housing Outcome Measure Benchmark APR # 1 date range: APR # 2 date range: APR # 3 date range: Self Score: Please see scoring sheet for score APR #1 project: APR #2 Project: APR #3 Project: APR #1 Grantee: APR #3 Grantee: APR #3 Grantee: People Retaining permanent housing > 12 months 90% Adults Stayers and Leavers Who Maintained or Increased Income 50% Adults obtaining or maintaining non-cash mainstream benefits 56% % of person who exited to homelessness <10% Proposed Rapid Rehosuing / Permanent Supportive Housing
POSTSECONDARY EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS DATA COMPILED AS OF (date): Programs listed below are those of which campus : applicable box and enter name of campus if appropriate) Main Campus Other Campus Location: Click each appropriate box to indicate method of measuring program length: Clock Hours Semester Credit Hours Complete Clock Hour/ Credit Hour Quarter Credit Hours Complete Clock Hour/ Credit Hour Chart PROGRAM NAME / CIP Code (Use One Line For Each Program) PROGRAM LENGTH % of Program’s Total Length Available Through Distance Education INSTRUCTIONAL DELIVERY METHOD (Check One or More) CREDENTIAL Number of STUDENTS ENROLLED on the date chart is completed Number of ASSIGNED Clock Hours Credit Hours Traditional Hybrid Distance Ed Certificate Diploma Degree Part-Time Full-Time Part-Time Full-Time Traditional Program – Program that requires all instructional to be completed on campus. Hybrid Program – Program in which less than 50% of the required instructional hours are available via distance education delivery methods. Distance Education Program – Program in which 50% or more of the required instructional hours are available via distance education delivery methods
months later. Using the formula below and the sample tables, identify each cell value to calculate the percentage of adults who obtained or maintained earned income. 24b1. Income Change by Income Category – Adult Stayers 24b2. Income Change by Income Category – Leavers PSH and general TH use the following formula: Adults Who Maintained or Increased Income: (A+B+C+E+F+G)/(D+H) = % of stayers and leavers who maintained or increased income RRH and TAY serving TH use the following formula: Adults Who Increased Income: (B+C+F+G)/(D+H) = % of adult stayers and leavers who increased income
Adults stayers and leavers who maintain or increase income 50% Adults obtaining or maintaining non-cash mainstream benefits 56% % of person who exited to homelessness <10% 2. Rapid Re- Housing and Transition Aged Youth-Serving TH Outcome Measure Use APR for Outcomes A-D Benchmark Self Please see scoring sheet for score People Who Obtain Permanent Housing 80% Adult Stayers and Leavers Who Increase Income 50% Adults obtaining or maintaining non-cash mainstream benefits 56% Returns to Homelessness <10% 3. General Use Transitional Housing Outcome Measure APR for Outcomes Benchmark Self Score: Please see scoring sheet for score People Who Obtain Permanent Housing 80%
Adults Stayers and Leavers Who Maintained or Increased Income 50% Adults obtaining or maintaining non-cash mainstream benefits 56% Average Length of Stay in Program Average LOS <180 days Proposed Permanent Supportive Housing Outcome Measure Benchmark APR # 1 date range: APR # 2 date APR # 3 date range: Self Please see scoring sheet for score APR #1 project: APR #2 Project: APR #3 Project: APR #1 Grantee: APR #3 Grantee: APR #3 Grantee: People Retaining permanent housing > 12 months 90% Adults Stayers and Leavers Who Maintained or Increased Income 50% Adults obtaining or maintaining non-cash mainstream benefits 56% % of person who exited to homelessness <10% Proposed Rehosuing / Permanent Supportive Housing
Standard 115.318 Upgrades to facilities and technologies Exceeds Standard (substantially exceeds requirement of standard) Meets Standard (substantial compliance; complies in all material ways with the standard for the relevant review period) Does Not Meet Standard (requires corrective action) Auditor discussion, including the evidence relied upon in making the compliance or determination, the auditor’s analysis and reasoning, and the auditor’s conclusions. This discussion must also include corrective action recommendations where the facility does not meet standard. These recommendations must be included in the Final Report, accompanied by information on specific corrective actions taken by the facility. There have been no physical plant upgrades or renovations during this audit period. The facility’s video surveillance system provides a camera view of every door in areas where youth are permitted as well as doors to enter areas where they are not permitted. The Annual Review of Staffing, Monitoring Technology and Facility Resources Report clearly addresses the use of technology to improve the safety of youth. Standard 115.321 Evidence protocol and forensic medical examinations Exceeds Standard (substantially exceeds requirement of standard) Meets Standard (substantial compliance; complies in all material ways with the standard for the relevant review period) Does Not Meet Standard (requires corrective action) Auditor discussion, including the evidence relied upon in making the compliance or determination, the auditor’s analysis and reasoning, and the auditor’s conclusions. This discussion must also include corrective action recommendations where the facility does not meet standard. These recommendations must be included in the Final Report, accompanied by information on specific corrective actions taken by the facility. Massachusetts DYS Policy and Procedure 01.05.07(b), page 10; the Memorandum of Understanding with Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care; and the Memorandum of Understanding with the Massachusetts State Police were reviewed by this auditor. The policy addresses all aspects of this standard. There were no instances of sexual abuse or assault during this audit period, and therefore there was no documentation to review. Physical evidence collection of criminal acts and forensic examinations are not conducted by facility staff. All staff are trained to preserve incident scenes and measures to prevent evidence from being destroyed. This was confirmed via interviews with staff. Criminal investigations are conducted by the Massachusetts State Police. There is a state-wide MOU for evidence collection and forensic examinations in place. There were no reported instances of sexual abuse or assault during this audit period. This was confirmed via email conversation with the DYS General Counsel.
Standard 115.377 Corrective action for contractors and volunteers Exceeds Standard (substantially exceeds requirement of standard) Standard (substantial compliance; complies in all material ways with the standard for the relevant review period) Does Not Meet Standard (requires corrective action) Auditor discussion, including the evidence relied upon in making the compliance or determination, the auditor’s analysis and reasoning, and the auditor’s conclusions. This discussion must also include corrective action recommendations where the facility does not meet standard. These recommendations must be included in the Final Report, accompanied by information on specific corrective actions taken by the facility. DYS Policy and Procedure 01.10.01(a), page 1 addresses the requirements of this standard. There were no reported instances of sexual abuse, assault or harassment by facility contractors or volunteers occurring during this audit period, and therefore there was no documentation to review for compliance. Standard 115.378 Disciplinary sanctions for residents Exceeds Standard (substantially exceeds requirement of standard) Meets Standard (substantial compliance; complies in all material ways with the standard for the relevant review period) Does Not Meet Standard (requires corrective action) Auditor discussion, including the evidence relied upon in making the compliance or determination, the auditor’s analysis and reasoning, and the auditor’s conclusions. This discussion must also include corrective action recommendations where the facility does not meet standard. These recommendations must be included in the Final Report, accompanied by information on specific corrective actions taken by the facility. were no reported incidents of youth on youth sexual abuse, assault or harassment. The facility has a youth handbook that outlines the behavioral treatment program response for such violations. Based upon the therapeutic nature of these programs the general tenor of responses are therapeutic in nature. In other words, behavioral change is the goal versus punitive actions. Based upon the fact that the facility’s primary goal related to disciplinary sanctions in response to rule violations is treatment oriented this auditor finds this standard to be in compliance.
Content: 1. SUMMARY Project Acronym Project Long Title Project Coordinator Name: E-mail: Coordinator Organisation (full name in original language / name in English) Original Language: English: Country/ Region Address Tel: Fax: Postal code (CEDEX)
CONSORTIUM OVERVIEW Organisation Partner name (Full name) Coordinator (P1) Partner 2: Partner 3: Partner 4: Partner 5: Partner 6: Technology Readiness (TRL) project start e.g.: TRL6 e.g. TRL2 e.g.: TRL 4 Technology Readiness Level (TRL) project end Organisation Type Website http: Region / Country Organisation registration number Size (Employees) Turnover (K€)4 Contact Person Title / Name Telephone E-mail Funding Organisation (FO) Name of FO + person contacted in FO Funding Programme (full name)
_____ Sales to consumers/homeowners _____ Installed sales Sales of manufactured components _____ Other (please list: ________________________________________________) Compared with 2015, in terms of percentage of total revenue, do you envision these parts of your business growing, shrinking, or staying the same in 2016? _____ New home construction Remodeling _____ Retail sales _____ Multifamily _____ Commercial _____ Installed sales _____ Component Manufacturing PART 4: WHAT YOU SELL of the following product categories does your company sell? Check all that apply: _____ Cabinetry _____ Carpets _____ Ceiling/acoustical panels _____ Decking and railing Doors (exterior) Doors (interior) _____ Drywall _____ Hardwood flooring Grills _____ Hardscaping _____ Housewrap Insulation _____ Locksets/hardware _____ Lumber (dimensional) Lumber (engineered) _____ Lumber (panels) _____ Molding/millwork Paints and stains _____ Shelving _____ Shingles/roof products _____ Siding
Pinpointing the criminogenic factors and tailoring a program based on those factors is proven to reduce recidivism. Proposal for the FY 2017 Recidivism Reduction Workgroup Plan ADOC Role: Beginning in FY 2017, the ADOC will: Continue to implement the Alaska Prisoner Reentry Framework by: supporting and working with the Community Reentry Coalitions currently existing in Anchorage, the Valley, Fairbanks, and Juneau; working with additional communities that want to start Reentry Coalitions; and requiring institutional staff and community probation officers to continue to work with Community Reentry Coalitions to ensure a seamless transition from prison to community. Identify medium classified inmates who will be released, the date of their release, the community to which they will be released, and the criminogenic risks/needs that should be addressed in their reentry plan. DHSS Role: Beginning in FY 2017, the DHSS will: identify the mental health and substance abuse services it is able to provide to these medium classified inmates. These services include: 24/7 monitoring or other electronic monitoring approach, e.g. Soberlink Annual enrollment: 1400 Monthly enrollment 125 Daily participation: 300 Estimated per month (each additional person cost an average of $294.11 per month) DHSS had approximately 1400 enrollments in the past 12 months, averaging 120 new participants per month. DHSS has an average
Program type Total Benefits Taxpayer Benefits Taxpayer Benefits Costs Benefits minus costs (net present value) Benefit to cost ratio Chance benefits will exceed costs EM (probation) $27,363 $6,691 $20,673 $1,102 $28,465 n/a 94% Cognitive behavioral tx for high & moderate risk offenders $11,201 $2,884 $8,317 ($424) $10,777 $26.47 100% Employment training/job assistance in the community $6,831 $1,568 $4,635 ($139) $6,064 $44.66 99% intensive drug tx in community $5,064 $1,368 $3,696 ($838) $4,226 $6.05 91% Inpatient/intensive out patient tx in community $1,416 $481 $935 ($1,032) $384 $138 52% Housing Assistance: In addition to the services identified above, as reported in the 2015 Recidivism Reduction Plan, the AHFC’s Tenant Based Rental Assistance Program provides motivated probationers in need with $700 a month in housing assistance.20 With this housing assistance, these individuals recidivated at a 50 percent lower rate than the typical offender. During the year of this study, the state saved $386,000 in costs associated with incarceration. Additionally, another study showed that addressing homelessness reduced recidivism by about 34%.21 Services Funneled through the Partner’s Reentry Center/ANJC (Anchorage) and through the Community Reentry Coalitions 20 2015 Recidivism Reduction Plan: Solutions to Slow prison Population Growth and Reduce Recidivism, February 2015, page 25. 21 Homelessness and reentry, CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, Vol. 41, No. 4, April, 2014,
storage units Website Development alternative to sandblasting IT Painting & Staining Tourism/Outdoor Rec-Canoeing/Biking I am an inventor Transport trailer repairs Marketing agency health print corporate communications Campground Food service Inventor & Writer All open ended answers or additional comments were accurately reproduced, regardless of error or intent. Responses are listed in chronological order based on the time stamp provided by the survey tool. Table 6, Question 9; From the list below, please check the top five (5) factors likely to have a major impact on your business during the next three (3) years. (Select five) Development in area of business Transportation time Employee shortage Compeny funded health insurance Internet Internet competition/consumers buying online Parking Tourism insurance company practices Health of key local business including Auto, Fast Food, Telecommunications, Energy, Health and Wellness. cost of printed material New Lisbon’s City Government is not friendly to business we are very close to losing large employers to other cities Companies interest Sustainability with remarkable high ROI Patent Pending on products Ag technologies weather/ seasons Lack of high internet Table 9, Question 13; If you face constraints on renovation or expansion, what are the top three (3) you are most worried about? Government reimbursement is 25% below cost, and it is our biggest payor
In case of emergency, it is approximately 6 miles to the nearest hospital -Mason District Hospital in Havana a9 (309) 543-4431 or at 911. To contact The Illinois Department of Natural Resources Conservation Police call the Fulton County Sheriff at (309) 547-2277.
These key parameters are set out in Table 15 and Table 16. Table : Key lighting parameters by location Parameter Whole house Living Sleeping Indoor Other Outdoor Number of 36.6 13.2 7.8 8.1 7.4 Number of Switches 23.7 6.7 6.1 6.3 4.6 Number of Fixed Lamps 32.9 12.3 5.6 8.0 7.1 Number of Plug Lamps 3.6 1.0 2.2 0.1 0.3 Number of Rooms 14.5 3.2 3.3 5.7 2.4 Floor Area (m2) 140.0 56.7 39.3 28.3 15.7 Share of all Rooms 100% 21.9% 22.6% 39.2% 16.4% Share of all Floor Area 100% 40.5% 28.1% 20.2% 11.2% per m2 (indoor) 0.23 0.23 0.20 0.29 N/A per Room 0.10 4.3 2.4 1.4 N/A Total Watts 1246.2 385.9 214.2 255.6 390.4 Power Density (Watts/m2) – Fixed Lamps indoor 6.7 6.3 4.1 11.1 N/A Power Density (Watts/m2) – Plug Lamps indoor 0.7 0.6 1.4 0.1 N/A Lumens 29279 8859 5172 5954 9295 Lighting Density (lm/m2) – Fixed Lamps indoor 157.0 149 107 243 N/A Lighting Density (lm/m2) – Plug indoor 15.1 12 28 2 N/A Note: All valves have been weighted in accordance with national demographic weighting factors, but have not taken into account usage patterns. Excludes heat lamps.
Table : Average House Summary – usage distribution by technology: outdoor areas (weighted) Average Usage Per House (h/day) Halogen MV Halogen ELV CFL integral CFL plug-in Linear Circular LED LED ELV LED Non Other Cannot identify low eff Cannot identify high eff Total 0≤ h < 0.05 92 80 31 112 0 91 0 19 23 2 0 1 0 451 0.05≤ h < 0.25 135 77 28 111 0 100 4 29 0 5 0 7 1 499 0.25≤ h < 0.5 13 16 9 15 0 31 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 90 0.5≤ h < 1 13 16 7 50 0 31 0 4 0 22 0 2 2 147 1≤ h < 2 16 6 9 10 0 14 4 10 0 0 0 3 0 72 2≤ h < 24.1 9 4 5 12 3 29 0 2 2 8 0 0 0 75 Sum of lamps 278 199 90 312 3 295 8 66 25 42 0 13 3 1333 Average h/day/lamp 0.21 0.27 0.32 0.34 3.00 0.63 0.50 0.30 0.15 0.89 NULL 0.35 0.33 0.37 Watt-hours/day 39 32 8 9 1 44 1 1 0 5 0 1 0 141 356 515 90 492 58 2744 32 82 14 342 0 17 6 4750 Houses with tech. 100 75 19 106 1 84 6 22 4 10 0 8 3 Note: All valves have been weighted in accordance with national demographic weighting factors. Rows 2 to 7 are a lamp by technology for the given usage levels in column 1.
R7 Double ended fitting, various lengths, linear halogen lamps, also LED replacements Linear fluorescent Transformer Transformer Pictures Notes Halogen – extra low voltage – magnetic Approx 200+ mm long Halogen – extra low voltage - electronic Smaller and lighter than magnetic
APPLICANT QUALIFICATIONS The following qualifications will be sought in a potential provider and will be assessed by evaluating an applicant’s proposal, and responses to interview questions, if applicable. For finalists, assessment of qualifications will also include the collection and evaluation of additional information utilizing, but not limited to, the evaluation procedures listed below: Qualifications Sought in a Provider Evaluation Procedures Applicant has a proven history of financial responsibility, stability and soundness. All finalists will be required to submit a Financial Statement form and attach business and financial records to substantiate the finalist’s adequate working capital. For finalists without business records, two years of tax returns will be requested and reviewed. Confer with Accounting Department and Fiscal Monitor at WRC and the Community Services and Accounting Departments at other regional centers as applicable. Applicant has a proven history demonstrating the ability to provide direct supervision or services/supports to persons with developmental disabilities or special needs. Confer with Client Services and Community Services staff at WRC, and other regional centers as applicable. Complete unannounced visit(s) to existing programs, homes or services owned/operated by the applicant. Applicant has proven credentials, licenses, training and/or skills required and/or preferred for the proposed project or service. Complete reference check to substantiate submitted resume(s) including applicable degrees, credentials, licenses or certificates, and descriptions of staff qualifications including specialized training and skills. Applicant has a proven history of positive working relationships with the community and applicable government agencies. If applicant is a current vendor, applicant must be in good standing with the regional center and licensing agencies. Confer with Client Services and Community Services staff at WRC, and other regional centers as applicable. Confer with licensing agencies (e.g., Dept. of Public Health or Community Care Licensing), as applicable. Applicant has a proven history in the area of project development, including the ability to complete projects, meet project timelines and manage a project of this size and Confer with Community Services staff at WRC and other regional centers as applicable, regarding applicant’s track record on managing and completing projects and meeting project timelines. Applicant has the administrative capacity to complete the project and/or implement the service in a timely fashion. Confirm the number of programs/projects applicant currently operates and/or has in development, and ensure that the applicant’s administrative capacity is not over stretched or that the applicant has competing or conflicting responsibilities with services vendored or in development with other regional centers.
Option 3 – introduce a widely offered test to zero-rate AIL Does not meet main objective Does not meet criteria (a) and (b) Partially meets criterion (c) Supported by submitters Broadly consistent with Australia No compelling reason why widely offered debt should be preferred Increases compliance and administration costs on adhering to arbitrary thresholds Option 4 – introduce a specific bank exemption from AIL Does not meet main objective Partially criteria (a) and (b) Meets criterion (c) More consistent than current exemptions but only for banks Does not address inconsistency between banks and non-banks. Very difficult to stop extension to other or all industries Option 5 – AIL to interest payments made by offshore branches to the extent that they lend to New Zealand (preferred option) Meets main objective Meets criteria (a), (b) and (c) Achieves objective with regard to offshore branches Raises additional revenue Internationally novel Option 6 – AIL to interest payments made to a that has a New Zealand branch with a banking licence if the lender and borrower are associated (preferred option) Meets main objective Meets criteria (a), (b) and (c) Achieves objective with regard to onshore branches Prevents circumvention of AIL by structuring into this arrangement if other preferred options implemented Consistent with other onshore branch changes recommended in NRWT RIS May encourage investment into New Zealand directly by foreign lenders Option 7 – apply AIL to notional loans to a New Zealand branch (preferred option) main objective Meets criteria (a), (b) and (c) Achieves objective with regard to funding allocated to onshore branches Raises additional tax revenue Broadly consistent with Australia May encourage investment into New Zealand directly by foreign lenders Option 8 – AIL defer AIL changes until a review of widely-held exemptions is undertaken Does not meet main objective During deferral criteria are the same as option 1 which includes not meeting criteria (a) or (b) Partially meets criteria (a) and (b) Does not meet criterion (c) Allows consideration of changes at same time as widely held bonds No reason why changes should be aligned with widely held bonds Allows current inconsistent treatment and effective subsidy of banks to remain for longer
1 Summary of analysis: objectives and impacts Description criteria (paragraph 30 refers) IMPACTS Recommendation Economic impact Fiscal impact Compliance impacts Administration impacts Risks Option 1: Status quo/ (a) and (b) are not met. (c), (d) and (e) are met. Gives preference to sole trader business structure over company business structure. Gives preference to fund business from personal savings and debt not subject to remission income rules. Inconsistent with policy for carrying forward tax losses. Nil Although there is a potential for wasted expenses to arise in determining whether carried forward tax losses exist, there is no change in compliance costs as this is the effect of the status quo. Ongoing uncertainty about application of tax law to bankrupts, including compliance obligations and the tax treatment of assets vested in the Official Assignee. Inconsistencies between law and policy remain. Uncertainty about the application of the law to bankrupts may give rise to wasted expenses. Does not address the problem. Not recommended. Option 2: Cancel carried forward tax losses if all debts cancelled under insolvency law/ (a) to (e) are all met. Has neutral effect. Consistent with policy for carrying forward tax losses. Nil No change in compliance costs would be expected as the outcome is largely consistent with current outcomes in practice. A potential minor decrease in administration costs, as the value of carried forward tax losses on discharge from bankruptcy would no longer be a disputable matter. No risks identified. Addresses the problem. Consistent with policy objectives. Recommended method. Option 3: Cancel carried-forward tax losses to the extent business debts cancelled under insolvency law. (a) to (e) are not met. Gives preference to sole trader business structure over company business structure. preference to fund business from personal savings and debt not subject to remission income rules. Inconsistent with policy for carrying forward tax losses. Nil. A net (small) increase in compliance costs would be expected, The scale of this net increase is not able to be determined due to data limitations. There is a risk of increased administration costs relating to determining the value of carried-forward tax losses. Inconsistencies between law and policy remain. Risk of dispute between administrators and taxpayer on whether carried-forward tax losses exist. Does not address the problem. Not recommended.
In Memory Steve Bucholtz August 20, 1970-September 9, On September 9, 2015, Equipment Operator Bucholtz, a 23-year veteran of the Public Service Department was killed in a car accident. City Council Top Row: Councilmember Kenneth W. Curp, Councilmember Mike Denning, Councilmember Steven C Fullenkamp, Councilmember Mike Bottom Row: Deputy Mayor Shirley Reynolds, Mayor William Flaute, Councilmember Sara Lommatzsch Boards and Commissions Personnel Appeals Board Fletcher Francesca Harry Planning Commission Anthony Rodgers Harold Vazquez David Owens Rick Kaufhold Julie Denning Mayor Bill Flaute (Ex-Officio) Board of Zoning Appeals Jerry Richardson Chuck Childers Tim Schneider
ability, skill, dependability, efficiency and qualifications to attend training and perform the work involved. If such factors are relatively equal, the most senior employee will be selected. In lieu of layoff, an employee displaced by new technology initiated by the Company will be placed on an open job commensurate with his or her qualifications if any ARTICLE VII EMPLOYEE PRIVLEGES Section 1-Vacations (A) Definitions The term "seniority" as used in this Section, shall be the Company Seniority to which an employee is entitled under the provisions of Article V, Section 1 (B) of this Agreement. Pay for each week of vacation for a full-time employee means pay for forty (40) hours at the employee's base rate of pay. Earned vacation credits as used in this Article shall accrue weekly and vest on a bi- weekly basis. (B) Vacations Employees covered by this Agreement shall vest vacation credits on a bi-weekly basis for each creditable workweek based on their length of continuous service. Creditable workweek is defined as a week in which the employee earns pay from the Company.
Do you maintain driver files as required by the DOT? yes no Are your trucks equipped with speed governors? yes no If yes, set at what speed? Are electronic log programs used to audit driver log books? yes no If yes, what program: Are your power units equipped with fender mirrors? yes no Does your safety program include safe driving incentive awards? yes no If yes, describe: Are units equipped with EOBR’s? yes no If yes, what features are activated? Current Insurer name: Policy Number: Policy Limits: $ Policy : from: / / to: / / Policy deductibles: Bodily injury: $ Property damage: $ Physical damage: $ Current monthly reporting rates: Mileage Revenue Power unit Liability monthly rate: $ Limits: $ Coverages available may vary by state and company Auto liability Liability for non-trucking use Limits - Combined single limit (BI/PD): $ Hired auto liability $ annual cost of hire Non-ownership liability Total number of employees: Are you required to coverage in excess of $1 million? yes no Trailer Interchange – Maximum trailer value: $ Annual # trailer days: Any additional insureds? yes no If yes, list the additional insureds and the interests of each: Physical Damage Cargo Combined Deductible Deductible Comprehensive or $ Specified Perils $ Collision $ Limit $ Deductible $ Declined Hired Auto Cargo Coverage included unless declined Declined Uninsured Motorist Limits $ Underinsured Motorist Limits $ Property Damage Liability Buyback (MI) Medical Payments Limits $ Personal Injury Protection Property Protection Coverage (MI PIP) Coverage selection/rejection form(s) for Uninsured Motorists, Underinsured Motorists, No-Fault, and Medical Payments insurance (as required by state law) must be completed and submitted together with this application for insurance coverage. Please provide state permit/authority numbers. Base state: Liability Cargo State Cargo State Liability Cargo State AL KY OK – OCC # AZ – not participating LA OR - not participating AR – Acord Cert Only ME PA - not participating CA – EX # Intra State MI SC CA - # Required MN SD CO MS TN COVERAGES
**Section 2 Pay Protection ☐ Section 3 Annual Pay Amount (to be completed by Practice Manager / Finance Manager) Basic Pay (Nodal Point) Pensionable £ Pay for additional hours above 40 (if applicable) Non-pensionable £ Enhanced pay at 37% Non-pensionable £ Weekend Allowance (if applicable) Non-pensionable £ On-Call availability supplement (if applicable) Non-pensionable £ Flexible Pay Premia Non-pensionable £ Schedule 2 -Pay Protection (top up), if applicable Pensionable Schedule 14 (Transitional) - Pay Protection (top up),if applicable Non-pensionable £ Is Specialty Trainee eligible for LTFT Annual Pay Premia (£1,500)? YES ☐ NO ☐ Non-pensionable £ Total Pensionable Pay £ Non-Pensionable Pay £ Total Annual pay for this role £ Total Monthly pay to be reimbursed by PCSE £ *If pay is inclusive of Section 1 Pay Protection, please attach confirmation of cash floor. ** If pay is inclusive of Section 2 pay protection – trainee will remain on old 2002 pay scale including banding supplement and continue to receive their annual increment. Signature of Practice Manager (required) Date Signature of Specialty Trainee (optional) Date Completed forms must be returned to: and copied to The practice and trainee should retain a copy of this document for their records.
Social environment work – identified (2013) The social work environment at the Department of Economics is a key task for the social environment group. Our work aims at proactively identifying factors that will positively influence the work environment. Need / factor Activity Responsible person Follow up/ communication Time Clarity in tasks and conditions for work Annual employee dialogue All persons in leading positions have undergone training in promoting a good work environment Head of department / Research group coordinator Summary to the HOD and feed-back to employees at the Department Annually, September Balancing work and private life Work descriptioin NL- faculty seminar 22/5 “Den framgångsrika forskaren…” (sw) All, persons in leading positions Employee follow-up dialogues Annually, September Job safety Information about how the financial system works Persons with leading positions Employee follow-up dialogues Annually A feeling of creating shared values Shared objectives All A shared understanding of what is desirable and acceptable in professional work Implementing our code of conduct (our codex) Individuals in leading positions Feedback in relation to the value grounds (our codex) + A “compass” training task at dep. conf. Continuously Annually Clarity with regards to what is expected and desired in a professional role Rewards and encouragement for extraordinary work performances Attention – a cake, news in the newsletter… to recognize achievements. Regular information Informative meetings on a continuous basis Individuals in leading positions Follow up on information needs by the employees Follow-up at the Department conferences
Need / factor Activity Responsible person Follow up/ communication Time Clarity in tasks and conditions for work Annual employee dialogue All persons in leading positions have undergone training in promoting a good work environment Head of department / Research group coordinator Summary to the HOD and feed-back to employees at the Department Annually, September Balancing work and private life Work descriptioin NL- faculty seminar 22/5 “Den framgångsrika forskaren…” (sw) All, persons in leading positions Employee follow-up dialogues Annually, September Job safety Information about how the financial system works Persons with leading positions Employee follow-up dialogues Annually A feeling of creating shared values Shared objectives All A shared understanding of what is desirable and acceptable in professional work Implementing our code of conduct (our codex) Individuals in leading positions Feedback in relation to the value grounds (our codex) + A “compass” training task at dep. conf. Continuously Annually Clarity with regards to what is expected and desired in a professional role Rewards and encouragement for extraordinary work performances Attention – a cake, news in the newsletter… to recognize achievements. Regular information Informative meetings on a continuous basis Individuals in leading positions Follow up on information needs by the employees Follow-up at the Department conferences Employee understanding of what should be done in emergencies Annual information about safety procedures HOD and research coordinators Ask about this during employee dialogues At the time of employment/ at Department conferences New employees learning about the ”A welcome package” presentations at Department HOD and research coordinators Employee follow-up dialogues Annually