A.1. Risk assessment Q01_ To what extent does your organisation have the skills to conduct emergency management risk assessments (ISO 31000/NERAG/Western Australia Emergency Risk Management Guide compliant)? Unsure No skills Very limited skills (i.e. EXTENSIVE limitations in resources, and/or capacity etc.) Limited skills (i.e. MAJOR limitations in resources, and/or capacity etc.) Some skills (i.e. MODERATE limitations in resources, and/or capacity etc.) Substantial skills (i.e. MINOR limitations in resources, and/or capacity etc.) skills (i.e. sufficient resources, and capacity at all levels) NOTE: As required in Section 3.2.6 of the State EM Policy QU01_ Comment B.1. Sector information sharing Q05_1_1_ Does your organisation share information about the individual risks with these stakeholders: Stakeholders Other State government agencies Unsure No sharing Very limited sharing Limited sharing Some sharing Substantial sharing Comprehensive sharing Local governments Unsure No sharing Very limited sharing Limited sharing Some sharing Substantial sharing Comprehensive sharing Business/Industry Unsure No sharing Very limited sharing Limited sharing Some sharing Substantial sharing Comprehensive sharing Communities Unsure No sharing Very limited sharing Limited sharing Some sharing Substantial sharing Comprehensive sharing QU05_1_1_Comment/Example Note* Examples of vulnerable elements may include, but are not limited to: social groups such as the elderly, culturally and linguistic diverse groups, endangered species, of scientific significance, essential services, critical assets etc. Q05_2_1_ Does your organisation information about vulnerable elements with these stakeholders: Stakeholders State government agencies Unsure No sharing Very limited sharing Limited sharing Some sharing Substantial sharing Comprehensive sharing
Local governments Unsure No sharing Very limited sharing Limited sharing Some sharing Substantial sharing Comprehensive sharing Business/Industry Unsure No sharing Very limited sharing Limited sharing Some sharing Substantial sharing Comprehensive sharing Communities Unsure No sharing Very limited sharing Limited sharing Some sharing Substantial sharing Comprehensive sharing QU05_2_1_ Comment/Example
Q05_3_1_ Does your organisation share information about treatment options with these stakeholders: Stakeholders State government agencies Unsure No sharing Very limited sharing Limited sharing Some sharing Substantial sharing Comprehensive sharing governments Unsure No sharing Very limited sharing Limited sharing Some sharing Substantial sharing Comprehensive sharing Business/Industry Unsure No sharing Very limited sharing Limited sharing Some sharing Substantial sharing Comprehensive sharing Communities Unsure No sharing Very limited sharing Limited sharing Some sharing Substantial sharing Comprehensive sharing QU05_3_1_ Comment/Example C.1. Horizon Scanning Your organisation has no questions in this section of the survey. C.2. Lesson Management Your organisation has no questions in this section of the survey.
E.7. Business continuity planning Q20_ Does your organisation have a business continuity plan? Yes No Note* Business Continuity Plans are widely considered best practice and are encouraged. For those to whom it is applicable, business continuity planning is undertaken in accordance with Treasurer’s Instruction 825 Risk Management and Security, issued under the Financial Management Act 2006. QU20_Comment If No Is Selected, Then Skip to Q21_ Do you engage with business/industry to encourage them to have business continuity plans? Q20_A_ Does your business continuity plan consider Yes No N/A Unsure EM hazard specific risks Strategies for fatigue management QU20_A_ Comment Q20_B_ How effective is your organisation’s business continuity plan: Unsure No in place Plans are either old, OR in the early stages of development, OR have considerable doubts about their current viability Some work completed but requires further work to develop, test, verify and/or embed in the organisation Informal and/or untested plans in place, but with a high degree of confidence they will be effective, OR, formal and/or tested plans but with further work identified as needed Formalised tested, mostly effective, mostly reliable, and largely embedded within the organisation Formalised plans, tested, effective, reliable, and embedded within the organisation QU20_B_ Comment Q21_ Does your organisation engage with business/industry to encourage them to have business continuity plans? Yes No Unsure QU21_ Comment/Describe
E.8. Community activities Q22_ Does your organisation have strategies for the protection of cultural places (e.g. heritage sites, memorials, churches, sporting facilities, etc.)? N/A Unsure No strategies in place Strategies are in the early stages of development, OR have considerable doubts about their current viability Some work completed but requires further work to develop, test, verify and/or embed in the organisation Untested strategies in place, but with a high degree of confidence they will be effective, OR, tested strategies but with further work identified as needed Strategies are tested, mostly effective, mostly reliable, and largely embedded within the organisation Strategies are tested, effective, reliable, and embedded within the organisation QU22_ Comment/Describe Q23_ Does your organisation have strategies for the timely re-establishment of community activities (e.g. cultural and community events, schools) following an emergency? N/A Unsure No strategies in place Strategies are in the early stages of development, OR have considerable doubts about their current viability Some work completed but requires further work to develop, test, verify and/or embed in the organisation Untested strategies in place, but with a high degree of confidence they will be effective, OR, tested strategies but with further work identified as needed Strategies are tested, mostly effective, mostly reliable, and largely embedded within the organisation Strategies are tested, effective, reliable, and embedded within the organisation Comment/Describe
F.1. People Q24_5_ To what extent are the emergency management personnel in your organisation trained: No Very limited training (i.e. limitations in resources, skills, and/or capacity etc.) Limited training (i.e. in skills, and/or capacity etc.) Some training (i.e. limitations in resources, skills, and/or capacity etc.) training (i.e. MINOR in skills, and/or capacity etc.) training (i.e. sufficient resources, skills, and capacity at all levels) Response personnel Recovery personnel personnel QU24_5_ Comment Q24_6_ To what extent are the emergency management personnel in your organisation capable: No Very limited capability (i.e. limitations in resources, skills, and/or capacity etc.) Limited (i.e. in skills, and/or capacity etc.) Some capability (i.e. limitations in resources, skills, and/or capacity etc.) capability (i.e. MINOR in skills, and/or capacity etc.) capability (i.e. sufficient resources, skills, and capacity at all levels) Response personnel Recovery personnel personnel QU24_6_ Comment resources
Q24_7_ To what extent are the emergency management personnel in your organisation supported (e.g. commitment at the executive level): No Very limited support (i.e. limitations in resources, skills, and/or capacity etc.) Limited support (i.e. MAJOR in skills, and/or capacity etc.) Some support (i.e. limitations in resources, skills, and/or capacity etc.) support (i.e. MINOR in skills, and/or capacity etc.) support (i.e. sufficient resources, skills, and capacity at all levels) Response personnel Recovery personnel personnel QU24_7_ Comment Q24_8_ To what extent does your organisation have sufficient numbers of emergency management personnel: No Very limited personnel (i.e. limitations in capacity) Limited (i.e. MAJOR in capacity) Some personnel (i.e. limitations in capacity) personnel (i.e. MINOR limitations in capacity) (i.e. sufficient capacity at all levels) Response personnel Recovery personnel personnel QU24_8_ Comment resources
Q48_A_a_ To what extent are sufficient numbers of trained Ambulance Services personnel available to transport patients to an appropriate hospital within an acceptable timeframe, in the Perth metropolitan area, for an emergency resulting in: Unsure No personnel Very limited personnel (i.e. limitations in capacity) Limited personnel (i.e. MAJOR limitations in capacity) Some personnel (i.e. limitations in capacity) Substantial personnel (i.e. MINOR limitations in capacity) Sufficient personnel (i.e. sufficient capacity at all levels) Moderate 202 total injuries Major 2,022 total injuries 20,220 total injuries QU48_A_a_ Comment
Q48_A_b_ To what extent are plans in place for Ambulance Services to transport patients to an appropriate hospital within an acceptable timeframe, in the Perth metropolitan area, for an emergency resulting in: Unsure No plans in place Plans are either old, OR in the early stages of OR have doubts about their current viability Some work completed but requires further work to develop, test, verify and/or embed in the Informal and/or untested plans in place, but with a high degree of confidence they will be effective, OR, formal and/or tested plans but with further work identified as needed Formalised plans, tested, mostly effective, mostly reliable, and largely embedded within the Formalised plans, tested, effective, reliable, and embedded within the Moderate 202 total injuries Major 2,022 injuries 20,220 total injuries QU48_A_b_ Comment Q48_A_c_ Is ambulance equipment required for a mass casualty event in the Perth metropolitan area: Yes No N/A Available Sufficient Accessible Maintained Pre-deployed QU48_A_c_ Comment
Q48_A_h_ To what extent are in place for Aero Medical Services to deliver patients to a point of definitive care within an acceptable timeframe, for an emergency resulting in: N/A Unsure No plans in place Plans are either old, OR in the early stages of OR have doubts about their current viability Some work but requires further work to develop, test, verify and/or in the Informal and/or untested plans in place, but with a high degree of they will be effective, OR, formal and/or tested plans but with further work identified as needed plans, tested, mostly effective, mostly reliable, and largely within the plans, tested, effective, reliable, and within the Moderate 54 total injuries 537 total injuries 5,369 total injuries QU48_A_h_ Comment Q48_A_i_ Is Aero Medical equipment required for a mass casualty event: Yes No N/A Available Sufficient Accessible Maintained Pre-deployed QU48_A_i_ Comment
Q48_A_m_ To what extent are sufficient Health Response Team resources available to respond appropriately, within an acceptable timeframe, in regional WA, for an emergency resulting in: N/A Unsure No Very limited (i.e. in capacity etc.) Limited (i.e. MAJOR in capacity etc.) Some (i.e. in capacity etc.) (i.e. MINOR in capacity etc.) (i.e. sufficient capacity at all levels) Moderate 54 total injuries 537 total injuries 5,369 total injuries QU48_A_m_ Comment
Q48_A_q_ To what extent are plans in place for hospital services to respond appropriately, within an acceptable timeframe, in the Perth metropolitan area, for an emergency resulting in: Unsure No plans in place are either old, OR in the early stages of OR have doubts about their current viability Some work completed but requires further work to develop, test, verify and/or embed in the Informal and/or untested plans in place, but with a high degree of confidence they will be effective, OR, formal and/or tested plans but with further work identified as needed Formalised tested, mostly effective, mostly reliable, and largely embedded within the Formalised tested, effective, reliable, and embedded within the Moderate 202 total injuries Major 2,022 total injuries 20,220 total injuries QU48_A_q_ Comment Q48_A_r_ Is hospital services equipment required for a mass casualty event in the Perth metropolitan area: Yes No N/A Available Sufficient Accessible Maintained Pre-deployed QU48_A_r_ Comment
Q48_A_s_ To what extent are sufficient hospital services resources available to respond appropriately, within an acceptable timeframe, in regional WA, for an emergency resulting in: N/A Unsure No Very limited (i.e. in capacity etc.) Limited (i.e. MAJOR in capacity etc.) Some (i.e. in capacity etc.) (i.e. MINOR in capacity etc.) (i.e. sufficient capacity at all levels) Moderate 54 injuries 537 total injuries 5,369 total injuries QU48_A_s_ Comment
Consequence Unsure 0% 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75-99% 100% Moderate 54 displaced people Major 537 displaced people Catastrophic 5,369 displaced people QU50_A_2_ Comment Q50_A_3_ To what extent does your organisation have in place to support the welfare of displaced persons for: N/A Unsure No in place Plans are either old, OR in the early stages of development, OR have considerable doubts about their current viability Some work completed but requires further work to develop, test, verify and/or embed in the organisation Informal and/or untested in place, but with a high degree of confidence they will be effective, OR, formal and/or tested plans but with further work identified as needed Formalised plans, tested, mostly effective, mostly reliable, and largely embedded within the organisation Formalised plans, tested, effective, reliable, and embedded within the organisation 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months or more QU50_A_3_ Comment/Describe
H.3. Impact assessment Q51_ To what extent are plans in place to manage: N/A No plans in place Plans are either old, OR in the early stages of OR have doubts about their current viability Some work completed but requires further work to develop, test, verify and/or embed in the Informal and/or untested plans in place, but with a high degree of they will be effective, OR, formal and/or tested plans but with further work identified as needed tested, mostly effective, mostly reliable, and largely within the tested, effective, reliable, and within the Directly impacted persons Family and friends of impacted persons Short term mental support Ongoing mental support Comment