Q18_A_g_ What strategies does your organisation use to mitigate and/or minimise the impacts of a single point of failure for key personnel/expertise? Q18_A_h_ What strategies does your organisation use to mitigate and/or minimise the impacts of a single point of failure for information technology? Q18_A_i_ What strategies does your organisation use to mitigate and/or minimise the impacts of identified single points of failure? E.6. Remoteness planning *Note: Remote areas are those places that are difficult to access. They can include remote Aboriginal communities, pastoral stations, offshore communities etc. Q19_ To what extent does your organisation consider emergencies that occur in remote areas* when conducting emergency planning? No arrangements in place are either old, OR in the early stages of development, OR have considerable doubts about their current viability Some work completed but requires further work to develop, test, verify and/or in the Informal and/or untested arrangements in place, but with a high degree of confidence they will be effective, OR, formal and/or tested but with further work identified as needed Formalised tested, mostly effective, mostly reliable, and largely embedded within the organisation Formalised tested, effective, reliable, and embedded within the organisation Comment/Example E.7. Business continuity planning Your organisation has no questions in this section of the survey. E.8. Community activities Your organisation has no questions in this section of the survey. A
F.1. People THE APPROPRIATE TABLE BELOW WILL BE DISPLAYED FOR SELECTED HAZARD Bushfire Consequence Table Consequence level Minor Moderate Major Catastrophic Consequence threshold $99,080,000 $990,800,000 $9,908,000,000 $99,080,000,000 Comparison to potential indicative event minor consequence level event is approximately 1.4 times as damaging as the Yarloop Bushfires, WA, January 2016 A moderate consequence level event is approximately 3/4 as damaging as the Black Saturday Bushfire, Victoria, February 2009. A major consequence level event is approximately 8 times as damaging as the Black Saturday Bushfire, Victoria, February 2009. A catastrophic level event is approximately 78 times as damaging as the Black Saturday Bushfire, Victoria, February 2009. Note: Consequence threshold in accordance with NERAG 2015 and WA Gross State Product, Indicative events taken from Insurance Council of Australia Catastrophe Database. Collapse Consequence Table Consequence level Minor Moderate Major Catastrophic Consequence threshold $99,080,000 $990,800,000 $9,908,000,000 $99,080,000,000 Comparison to potential indicative event Note: Consequence threshold in accordance with 2015 and WA Gross State Product, Cyclone Consequence Table Consequence Minor Moderate Major Catastrophic Consequence threshold $99,080,000 $990,800,000 $9,908,000,000 $99,080,000,000 Comparison to potential indicative event minor consequence level event is approximately 1.5 times as damaging as Cyclone Olwyn, WA, March 2015 A moderate consequence level event is approximately 2/3 as damaging as Cyclone Debbie, South Wales, March 2017 A major consequence level event is approximately twice as damaging as Cyclone Tracy, Darwin, December 1974 A catastrophic consequence event is approximately 24 times as damaging as Cyclone Tracy, Darwin, December 1974
Note: Consequence threshold in accordance with NERAG 2015 and WA Gross State Product, Indicative events taken from Insurance Council of Australia Catastrophe Database. Earthquake Consequence Table Consequence level Minor Moderate Catastrophic Consequence threshold $99,080,000 $990,800,000 $9,908,000,000 $99,080,000,000 Comparison to potential indicative event A minor consequence level event is approximately 3 times as damaging as the Earthquake, April 2010 A moderate consequence event is approximately 1/3 as damaging as the Newcastle Earthquake, 1989 A consequence level event is approximately half as damaging as the Christchurch Earthquake, February 2011 A catastrophic level event is approximately 4 times as damaging as the Christchurch Earthquake, February 2011 Note: Consequence threshold in accordance with 2015 and WA Gross State Product, Indicative events taken from Insurance Council of Australia Catastrophe Database and Munich Re, NatCatSERVICE, 2015, Loss events worldwide 1980 – 2014, 10 costliest earthquakes ordered by insured losses. HAZMAT-Chemical Consequence Table Consequence level Minor Moderate Major Catastrophic Consequence threshold $99,080,000 $990,800,000 $9,908,000,000 $99,080,000,000 Comparison to potential indicative event Note: Consequence threshold in accordance with NERAG 2015 and WA Gross State Product, Consequence Table Consequence level Minor Moderate Major Catastrophic Consequence threshold $99,080,000 $990,800,000 $9,908,000,000 $99,080,000,000 Comparison to potential indicative event A minor consequence level event is approximately as 1.4 times as damaging as the Gascoyne River Flooding, December 2010 A moderate consequence level event is approximately as damaging as Queensland Flooding from Ex Cyclone Oswald, January 2013 A major consequence level event is approximately 10 times as damaging as Queensland Flooding from Ex Cyclone Oswald, January 2013 A catastrophic consequence level event is approximately 96 times as damaging as Queensland Flooding from Ex Cyclone Oswald, January 2013
Storm Consequence Table Consequence level Minor Moderate Catastrophic Consequence threshold $99,080,000 $990,800,000 $9,908,000,000 $99,080,000,000 Comparison to potential indicative event A minor consequence level event is approximately as damaging as the Perth to Bunbury Storm and Tornado, May 2005 A moderate consequence level event is approximately 3/4 as damaging as the Perth Storm, March 2010 A major consequence level event is approximately 9 times as damaging as the Perth Storm, March 2010 A catastrophic consequence level event is approximately 87 times as damaging as the Perth Storm, March 2010 Note: Consequence threshold in accordance with NERAG 2015 and WA Gross State Product, Indicative events taken from Insurance Council of Australia Catastrophe Database. Tsunami Consequence Table Consequence Minor Moderate Catastrophic Consequence threshold $99,080,000 $990,800,000 $9,908,000,000 $99,080,000,000 Comparison to potential indicative event Note: Consequence threshold in accordance with NERAG 2015 and WA Gross State Product,
Q35_1_ Can your organisation manage multiple concurrent SELECTED HAZARD emergencies (moderate consequences or higher) with existing equipment? Yes No QU35_1_ What are the limiting factors for equipment? Q36_ Are plans for equipment in place to address: No in Plans are either old, OR in the early stages of OR have considerable doubts about their current viability Some work completed but requires further work to develop, test, verify and/or embed in the Informal and/or untested plans in place, but with a high degree of they will be effective, OR, formal and/or tested plans but with further work identified as needed Formalised plans, tested, mostly effective, mostly reliable, and largely embedded within the Formalised plans, tested, effective, reliable, and embedded within the Mobilisation Peak surges for outages QU36_Comment
Q46_ Which (if any) relevant organisations would be challenging to maintain effective communications with during an emergency: Yes Yes Australia Red Department of Treasury, Public Utilities Office ATCO Gas Australia Department of Water and Environmental Regulation Australian Defence Force Horizon Power Arc Infrastructure (formerly Brookfield Rail) Insurance Council of Australia Bureau of Meteorology Main Roads Western Australia Dampier Bunbury Pipeline nbn Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions - Parks and Wildlife Service Public Transport Authority Department of Communities (includes former Dept. Child Protection and Family Support and Housing Authority) St John Ambulance Department of Education Telstra Department of Fire & Emergency Services WA Local Government Association Department of Health Corporation Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage Western Australia Police Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (includes former Dept. Agriculture and Food WA) Western Power Department of the Premier and Cabinet (please describe) Department of Transport - Marine Safety QU46_ Describe Q47_ Has your organisation identified any impediments to internal and/or interagency effectiveness during an emergency? Yes No QU47_ Comment If No Is Selected, Then Skip to Mass casualty management QU47_A_ How are these impediments to internal and/or interagency effectiveness being managed/addressed?