2018 Junior Competitive Events Delaware Career and Technical Student Organizations (Business Professionals of America (BPA); DECA, An Association of Marketing Students; FFA; Family, Career and Community Leaders of America (FCCLA); HOSA; Skills USA; and Technology Student Association (TSA) are resource and support organizations that do not select, control or supervise local chapter or individual member activities except as expressly provided for in Delaware Career and Technical Student Organizations’ constitutions, bylaws, or policies.
Delaware Events ~ Junior Level Attire Guidelines The world sums you up by the clothes that you wear, and treats you accordingly. - Al Koran What you wear is very important. It reflects upon your school, your family, Delaware FCCLA, and yourself. Attire Participant’s dress is inappropriate Participant is neat but attire not appropriate Participant is neat and clean but attire is too casual. Participant is neat and clean Participant is neat and clean Participant is neat, clean and dress is professional What does this mean? Here are some examples… Skirt is too short, blouse is too revealing, clothing is too tight, clothing is dirty, flip flops, jeans, t-shirts, hair uncombed Skirt is too short, blouse is too revealing, clothing is too tight, flip flops, jeans, t-shirts clothing wrinkled, shorts, capris, flip flops Dressed in a casual, but not necessarily professional manner, sandals, shorts Dressed in a casual, but not necessarily professional manner Skirt/blouse, dress pants/blouse, shirt and tie, suit. Attire is modest and shoes are closed-toe.
Early Childhood Exhibit – Junior Level Rubric Name of Participant___________________________________ FCCLA Planning Process (points x2) 0 Planning Process summary was not provided 1 Inadequate steps in the Planning Process are presented 2 All Planning Process steps are presented but not summarized 3 All Planning Process steps are summarized 4 Evidence that the Planning Process was utilized to plan project 5 The Planning Process was used to plan the project. Each step is fully explained. Product (points x6) No product Product no understanding of child development concepts; poor construction Product indicates an understanding of child development concepts Product was well-done but doesn’t show strong connections to child development concepts Product was well-done and showed substantial knowledge of child development concepts Innovative, interesting and creative. Demonstrates thorough knowledge. Summary of knowledge of ECE Concepts (points x4) Summary is missing Summary shows limited understanding of child development concepts Summary little evidence of child development concepts being applied to product Summary shows child development concepts were known to the participants Summary shows extensive evidence that child development concepts were applied and utilized Summary shows an exceptional level of understanding and use of child development concepts Product Documentation (points x3) No evidence Has many errors, does not show evidence Has minimal appeal; lacks evidence Evidence not convincing Shows that student completed work; no evidence of progression Shows evidence of how student completed the product Response to Evaluators’ Questions (points x4) Did not answer Unable to answer some questions Responded to all questions but without ease or accuracy Responded adequately to all questions Gave appropriate responses to evaluators questions Responses to questions were appropriate and given without hesitation Attire Participants dress is inappropriate Participant is neat but attire not appropriate Participant is neat and clean but attire is too casual. Participant is neat and clean Participant is neat and clean Participant is neat, and dress is professional TOTAL POINTS_____/100
Culinary Exhibit – Junior Level Rubric Name of Participant___________________________________ FCCLA Planning Process (points x2) 0 Planning Process summary was not provided 1 Inadequate steps in the Planning Process are presented 2 All Planning Process steps are presented but not summarized 3 All Planning Process steps are summarized 4 Evidence that the Planning Process was utilized to plan project 5 The Planning Process was used to plan the project. Each step is fully explained Product (points x4) No product Product is not appealing and most likely incorrectly prepared Product not appealing even though prepared correctly Acceptable product that appeal Product is attractive and correctly prepared Product is appealing and perfectly prepared Product Taste (points x5) No product Questionable taste Taste needs some improvement Adequate taste but not outstanding Good taste Exceptionally pleasing taste Product Summary points x2) Summary is missing limited use of food preparation skills Shows some evidence of food preparation skills Food preparation skills were known and used in this product Extensive evidence that food preparation skills were applied and utilized Shows an exceptional level of food preparation skills Product Documentation (points x3) No evidence Has many errors, does not show evidence Has minimal appeal; lacks evidence Evidence not convincing Shows that student completed work; no evidence of progression Shows evidence of how student completed the product Response to Evaluators Questions (points x3) Did not answer Unable to answer some questions Responded to all questions but without ease or accuracy Responded adequately to all questions Gave appropriate responses to evaluator’s questions Responses to questions were appropriate and given without hesitation Attire Participant’s dress is inappropriate Participant does not appear clean; attire not appropriate Participant is neat and clean but attire is not appropriate Participant is neat and clean but attire is too casual Participant is neat and clean Participant is neat, clean and dress is professional TOTAL POINTS_____/100
Clothing and Textiles Exhibit– Junior Level Rubric Name of Participant___________________________________ FCCLA Planning Process (points x2) 0 Planning Process summary was not provided 1 Inadequate in the Planning Process are presented 2 All Planning Process steps are presented but not summarized 3 All Planning Process steps are summarized 4 Evidence that the Planning Process was utilized to plan project 5 The Planning Process was used to plan the project. Each step is fully explained. Appropriate use of Fabric (points x3) No product Finished product or garment not appropriate for fabric selected Finished product or garment would have been better suited to a different fabric choice. Finished product or garment and fabric selected are an acceptable match Finished product or garment and fabric selected work well Finished product or garment and fabric selected are a perfect match. Product Construction (points x5) Product is missing. Poor construction skills. Needs extensive work/ shows some evidence of construction skills Some construction skills are present; needs improvement. Extensive use of good construction skills. Shows exceptional construction skills. No errors Overall quality of workmanship (Points x4) No product Low quality workmanship Marginal quality workmanship Fair quality workmanship Good quality workmanship Excellent ; quality workmanship Product Documentation (points x2) No evidence Has many errors, does not show evidence Has minimal appeal; lacks evidence Evidence not convincing Shows that student completed work; no evidence of progression Shows evidence of how student completed the product Response to Evaluators’ Questions (points x3) Did not answer Unable to answer some questions Responded to all questions but without ease or accuracy Responded adequately to all questions Gave appropriate responses to evaluators questions Responses to questions were appropriate and given without hesitation Attire Participants dress is inappropriate Participant is does not appear clean; attire not appropriate. Participant is neat and clean but attire is not appropriate. Participant is neat and clean but attire is too casual. Participant is neat and clean Participant is neat, clean and dress is professional TOTAL POINTS_____/100 points
Tablescape Exhibit – Junior Level Rubric Name of Participant___________________________________ FCCLA Planning Process (points x2) 0 Planning Process summary was not provided 1 Inadequate in the Planning Process are presented 2 All Planning Process are presented but not summarized 3 All Planning Process steps are summarized 4 Evidence that the Planning Process was utilized to plan project 5 The Planning Process was used to plan the project. Each step is fully explained. Place Setting (points x5) No place setting Place setting is not appealing and does not complement menu Place setting not appealing even though complements menu Acceptable setting that lacks appeal. setting is attractive and complements menu Place setting is appealing, creative and perfectly aligned to menu Correctness (points x5) No place setting Place setting does not follow correct placement 3 or more errors in placement of dishes, cutlery, glassware, or accessories 2 errors in placement of dishes, cutlery, glassware, or accessories 1 error in placement of dishes, cutlery, glassware, or accessories All dishes, cutlery, and glassware, and accessories correctly positioned Menu (points x2) Menu is missing Menu shows limited use of nutritional principles shows some evidence of nutritional principles Nutritional principles are present in the menu but lacks contrast Extensive evidence of good nutritional principles Shows an exceptional use of texture and color while being nutritionally sound Product Documentation (points x2) No evidence Has many errors, does not show evidence Has minimal appeal; lacks evidence Evidence not convincing Shows that student completed work; no evidence of progression Shows evidence of how student completed the product Response to Evaluators’ Questions (points x3) Did not answer Unable to answer some questions Responded to all questions but without ease or accuracy Responded adequately to all questions Gave appropriate responses to evaluators questions Responses to questions were appropriate and given without hesitation Attire Participants dress is inappropriate Participant is does not appear clean; attire not appropriate. Participant is neat and clean but attire is not appropriate. Participant is neat and clean but attire is too casual. Participant is neat and Participant is neat, clean and dress is professional TOTAL POINTS_____/100 points
Prepared Public Speaking – Junior Level Written Manuscript Rubric Name of Participant___________________________________ Quality of Writing (points x3) 0 Total lack of style and organization 1 Piece had main idea, but no recognizable organization 2 Good main idea; lacks support; weak introduction and conclusion 3 Piece was interesting; weak introduction and conclusion; only 1-2 items of support 4 Piece was written in interesting style; effective introduction, support, and conclusion 5 Piece was written in an extraordinary style; highly creative introduction, support and conclusion Mechanics (points x2) So many errors that it interferes with meaning A number of errors that somewhat interfered with meaning mechanical errors interfered with meaning; errors at times affect understanding Few mechanical errors; did not interfere with meaning; weak structure Minimal mechanical errors; did not interfere with meaning; effective word use Virtually no mechanical errors; good word choices References No references included Weak citations; errors in use of APA guidelines; 2 or few citations Basic citations; errors in use of APA guidelines; 3 or fewer citations Few errors in citations; 3-4 citations; correct use of APA guidelines Good citations; correct use of APA guidelines; include 4-5 sources Perfect citations; correct use of APA guidelines; includes 5 or more sources WRITTEN MANUSCRIPT SUBTOTAL _____/30 points SPEECH SUBTOTAL _____/70 points POINTS TOTAL _____/100 points