zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Girls and boys often enjoy playing the same sport. Some people believe that girls and boys should be able to play on the same team. What is your opinion on this issue? Write an essay stating your opinion and supporting it with convincing reasons. Be sure to explain your reasons in detail. It has been said that television has little real educational value. What is your opinion on this issue? Write an essay stating your opinion and supporting it with convincing reasons. Be sure to explain your reasons in detail. The principal of your school is considering conducting random locker searches several times a year without letting students know in advance. What is your position concerning this issue? Write a letter to the principal stating your position and supporting it with convincing reasons. Be sure to explain your reasons in detail. Suppose Congress wants to make a new national holiday honoring an important person or event. Choose a person or event you would like to honor. Write an essay to convince members of Congress to accept your choice. Your principal has students to suggest a school rule that should be changed. Think of one rule that you would like to have changed. Write a letter convincing your principal that this rule should be changed. Be sure to support your opinion with convincing reasons and evidence.
MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION PRIVATE SCHOOL REVIEW PROFESSIONAL CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENT DAY PROGRAM MID-CYCLE REVIEW REPORT Previous Program Review Corrective Action Plan Submitted on November 9, 2010 Progress Reports Submitted on Not Applicable Mid-cycle Onsite Visit Conducted on November 5, 2012 Date of this Report: November 15, 2012 Criterion Number and Topic Implementation Status of Requirements or Corrective Action Plan Determined to be Substantially Method(s) of Verification Comments Regarding Corrective Action Plan Implementation Corrective Action Plan Determined to be Not Fully Implemented or Additional Issues Findings Regarding Incomplete Implementation of Approved Corrective Action Plan or Identification of Additional Issues of Noncompliance Further Corrective Action Ordered by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education and Timelines for Implementation and Further Progress Reporting
28.09(7)(a); 603 CMR 44.00 11.4 Teachers (Special Education Teachers and Regular Education Teachers) 18.05(11)(f); 28.09(5)(a); 28.09(7)(b, c); 34 CFR 300.321 Documentation Interviews All teaching staff have teaching licenses or current waivers appropriate to meet the needs of the population being served as most recently approved. 11.5 Related Services Staff 28.09(7)(d) Documentation Interviews All related service providers are currently certified, licensed or registered in their professional area as required. 11.6 Master Documentation Professional Center for Child
Staff Roster 28.09(7) Interviews Development submitted a master staff roster for every position within the program that corresponds to the last approved Program Budget as required. 19 Anti-Hazing M.G.L. c. 269, §§ 17 through 19 Not Applicable Professional Center for Child Development does not serve secondary school age students. 20 Bullying Prevention and Intervention M.G.L. c. 71, s. 37H, as amended by Chapter 92 of the Acts of 2010. M.G.L. c. 71, s. 37O(e)(1) & Documentation Interviews Professional Center for Child Development has amended its handbook/admission material to include an age-appropriate summary of their Bullying Prevention Plan as approved by the Program’s Board of Directors and included a description of how it was distributed. The program also submitted a description of the professional development plan
students that now includes all of the requirements as listed in this criterion. 9.4 Physical Restraint (Day programs only) 18.05(5); 603 CMR 46.00 Documentation Interviews At the time of the Program Review, Professional Center for Child Development had a restraint policy; however, review of documentation and interviews indicated that while one staff member had been fully trained in Crisis Prevention Intervention (CPI), that staff member did not have a current certificate. The Program submitted evidence that two members have current certification in Safety-Care Behavioral Safety Specialist Training in which staff learn to intervene professionally and therapeutically, using a safe,
Hopetown & Loscoe OAP – Residents have concerns regarding the Ashfield development and like to meet with the developer. Woodside Richmond Fellowship – There has been a change of staff. A meeting was to be arranged with the new team. 154. Planning Planning were circulated as follows – No objections were received. Validated Applications 14th December 2015 21st December 2015 4th January 2016 12th January 2016 27th January 2016 1st February 2016 Planning Decisions 7th – 11th December 2015 21st December 2015 21st December 2015 – 4th January 2016 11th – 15th January 2016 18th – 22nd January 2016 25th – 29th January 2016 Members requested that from May the Planning Committee is resurrected and meetings are to be held on a quarterly basis or more frequently if required. The Road Safety Committee had their funding removed and were struggling to continue. The Town Council offered to provide administrative support to the group to ensure that it continues to meet. This committee would report to the Planning & Highways Committee on a regular basis. 155. Flooding at Newlaithes Crescent and Wheatley Avenue RESOLVED that the notes of the meeting to discuss flooding be received. It was noted that the majority of the residents were now happy with the answers that had been received from Yorkshire Water.
DEVELOPMENT ENQUIRY FORM 2018 To: Flinders Council – Development Services PO Box 40 WHITEMARK TAS 7255 Enquirer details: Owner Name: Cat (if applic): Business name: Address: Ph: Licence No (if applic): Email address: Owner: (if different from above) Cross out if not applicable Name: Contact Number: Property Details: Address: Lot No: Building Class Building / Plumbing / Demolition work details: (Circle as relevant) Type of work: Building work Plumbing work Demolition work (X all applicable) Size of Building: Height of Building: Dist. – Boundary Dist. – Rear Boundary: Dist. – Closest Side Boundary Dist. – Other Side Boundary Dist. – Closest Building Dist. – next Closest Building Dist. – Taswater Service (if known) Dist. – Dwelling (if Applicable) Bushfire prone area (if known) Landslip area (if known) General Description Including approximate cost of works $ Name: [print] Signed Date Enquirer: In signing above, I certify that if not the owner, I have permission from the owner to make this enquiry Please attach a design of your proposed building works and a site plan to accompany this form
13 September 2016 Press Release parts2clean 2017 (24 – 26 October): Good prospects for autumn 2017 High proportion of re-bookers Special display formats geared to different topics . Although parts2clean is not scheduled to take place again until more than 12 months from now (24 – 26 October, Stuttgart), the Leading International Trade Fair for Industrial Parts and Surface Cleaning is already taking shape. Approximately 70 exhibitors had already registered for the next event during or shortly after the last parts2clean in June, 2016. Even at this early stage more than 3,000 square metres of display space – half the entire area occupied by the event – had been booked. parts2clean has been moved back to the autumn at the specific request of the exhibitors. Halls 3 and 5 will then focus on products and solutions for industrial cleaning. At present the organizers of parts2clean are planning various display formats. “There are numerous exciting new topics”, explains Olaf Daebler, Director of parts2clean at
Content, inspiration, emotions In translating the keynote theme into the space on the exhibition grounds, Hall 9 will play a key role, creating a diverse realm of experience that reaches its peak at the heart of the show. This will be the location for brand and lifestyle-oriented companies. This hall will also house the special “Framing Trends” showcase to which companies, newcomers, artists and actors – individually or in groups – can contribute. The “Unique Youniverse” keynote theme will be highlighted most distinctively there. The special Framing Trends display in Hall 9 will be divided into four different modules, featuring contributions from a number of different players. The Flooring Spaces module for instance will feature creative displays by covering firms reflecting the keynote theme. And the Living Spaces module will bring together partners from various disciplines who will work together to construct inspiring lifestyle displays. In the “NuThinkers” module, students, young designers and can present the innovative projects they have developed on the topic of “Unique Youniverse”. And the “Art and Interaction” section will feature exhibits from the worlds of art and design that use interactive and multimedia presentations to make the keynote theme tangible to the senses. In addition, a special “Talks” program will feature lectures on topics relating to the “Unique Youniverse”. The speakers will consist of architects, designers and other industry experts, addressing not just various industry trends, but also topics of overarching, creative and social relevance. Their informative and inspiration-rich offerings will be rounded out by contributions from bloggers, artists and trend consultants, as well as by guided tours through Framing Trends by experts from
ESTABLISHED PRACTITIONER’S APPLICATION FORM CONFIDENTIAL PERSONAL DETAILS Full Name: (please use block letters) Mr/Mrs/Miss/Ms (please delete as applicable) Address: (Home) (Correspondence) Tel: Tel: Email address: mobile: EDUCATION AND QUALIFICATIONS Please give details of undergraduate/postgraduate/professional qualifications. Other qualifications, membership of professional bodies, awards, scholarships held, etc. Called to the Bar: (1) Date of call (2) Inn of Court CAREER HISTORY/PRACTICE (please enter on a separate sheet if necessary) 1. Please give details of your current practice.
eCall test centre client Implementation language is C#- using the .NET framework. List of Available Test Parameters The following test parameters can be configured per test case. Table 2: Test parameters that can be configured (Germany) Parameter name Type values Default value Remarks Accept call bool True / False True If this is set to true, a caller gets busy signal Hang up call after int 0 – 3600 seconds 0, means never Hang up after X seconds AL-Ack value int 0 – 15 0, means „Positive Ack“ Request MSD int 0 – 3600 seconds 0, means never Measured from call begin Abort after initiation bool True / False False Disconnects in-band upon INITIATION signal Number of int 0 – 20 4 0 implies deactivation of in-band modem Number of int 0 – 20 4 0 implies deactivation of in-band modem Timer T4 (wait for INITIATION signal) int 0 – 20 seconds 2 According to CEN/TC-278 (HLAP) Annex A T8 (MSD max reception time) int 0 – 120 seconds 20 According to CEN/TC-278 (HLAP) Annex A Call back after int 0 – 3600 seconds 0, means never X seconds hang up a call back to IVS is automatically
Romania 13: Case file Data (Romania) Data Role 112 PSAP Police Fire brigade Ambulance Free text Short description of incident X X X X Incident address Locality, municipality, Street, street no. X X X X Responsibility area Agencies responsibility area X X X Caller information Name, Surname, telephone number, address X X X X Victim information Name, Surname, age, sex, X X X X Telephone location Cell id, Sector id position X X X X Case Incident Classification X X X X Case questions Help operator to understand the incident type X X X MSD All fields according to standards X X X X EUCARIS All fields according to standards X X X X Sweden To be added General workflow
Figure 30: Operational timetable (Greece) Italy Figure 31: Operational timetable (Italy) Netherlands Figure 32: Operational timetable (Netherlands) Figure 33: Hazardous Vehicles Timetable (Netherlands) Romania December 2011 – operating January 2012 – analyze / collecting data February 2012 – adaptation / modification of the current work procedures March – April 2012 – operating June 2012 - analyze / collecting data July 2012 – analyze KPI August 2012 – optimize workflow September 2012 – finalizing the work methodology and work procedures
5 (310 MHz) -29.938 No signal -22.241 (8%) - - left -32.326 No signal -30.995 (8%) - 6 (310 MHz) -31.660 No signal -21.026 (8%) No signal (17%) 240 (8% PMMA) Ampl: 0,947 db Phase: 11,928 deg (PMMA 8%) left -29.851 No signal -22.540 (8%) No signal (17%) - 7 (155 MHz) right -32.424 -27.978 - Not sensitive (no photoresist) left -75.342 -22.460 - - 8 (155 MHz) right - -22.283 - Ampl: 1,057 db Phase: 31,143 deg (photoresist) Ampl: 0,424 db Phase: 38,177 deg (photoresist) left - -27.121 - Ampl: 1,413 db Phase: 30,194 deg (photoresist) 9 (155 MHz) right - -43.073 - Ampl: 1,672 db Phase: 30,955 deg (photoresist) left - -37.671 - Ampl: 1,672 db Phase: 21,756 deg (photoresist) 10 (155 MHz) right - -25.418 - 1000 Photoresist - left - -22.704 - Ampl: 1,328 db Phase: 29,384 deg (with photoresist) Ampl: 1,271 db Phase: 32,008 deg (with photoresist, after plasma) 11 (35 MHz) right -78.455 -57.766 -67.387 (17%) - left -60.342 -56.552 -58.475 (17%) Not sensitive (with photoresist) 11 (105 MHz) right -76.046 - -54. 595 (17%) - left -58.053 - -45. 420 (17%) Ampl: 0,134 db Phase: 3,135 deg (PMMA 17%) 12 (35 right -(scratched) -57.617 - (scratched) -
Standard(s) Required: ISO 9001:2015 ISO OHSAS 18001 SSIP Required ISO 22301:2014 ISO ISO ISO 50001:2011 GMP HACCP SA 8000 ISO 22000:2005 BS 76000 Company Name: Company addresses to be certified: Head Office: Address 2: Address 3: Address 4: Address 5: Type of management system: Single Combined Integrated Total number of sites to be registered as a multisite: If multiple sites please indicate locations and employee numbers: Contact Name (including title): Position: Telephone: E-mail: Website: Sector: Main Language: How did you hear about ACM? Name of Consultant (if used): Company Name: Website of Consultant: Do you hold any other third party registrations? Type of application (please select from the following options): New Renewal Scope Extension Transfer (please send in your latest Certificate(s) and Report(s) Type of Payment: Full Payment Stage Payments When will you be for a Stage one review: Scope: Please describe what activities your organisation carries out: Please list the number of employees in each area/site: Full Time Part Time Shifts Full Time (Site 2) Part Time (Site 2) Shifts (Site 2)
Please identify all energy sources for the organisation (electricity, gas, fuel, oil, biomass etc.): Please list the number of employees with energy influence: (Please use additional sheets if required) Influence % (Site 1) Influence % (Site 2) Energy system maintenance staff (internal) Energy system maintenance staff (external) EnMS Management Representative Energy Management Team Administration Management / Service Area Operational Staff Quality Control / Technical Storage / Warehouse Others ISO (Only) Please list the number of employees with risk influence: (Please use additional sheets if required) Risk % (Site 1) Risk % (Site 2) Senior Management Management Administration Staff Management / Service Area Operational Staff Quality Control / Technical Storage / Warehouse Others Name: Position: Date: Please send back filled form to:
A qualified medical physicist should perform these tests. Alternatively, the tests may be performed by properly trained individuals, such as a nuclear medicine technologist, who has been authorized by a supervising medical physicist. The test results must be reviewed by the qualified medical physicist and properly documented. Note that some specifications that follow come from IAEA Human Health Series 6. 3.3.2 Parameter Actor Requirement Planar Uniformity Imaging Site Uniformity of response to a uniform flux of radiation from an point source shall be measured intrinsically every quarter. On a daily basis planar uniformity with collimators used for I-123 imaging shall be performed using a Tc-99m or Co-57 flood source.. System Spatial Resolution Physicist Tests the resolution of the system in terms of the FWHM of its point spread function. Test shall be conducted semiannually with the collimators routinely used with 123I ioflupane studies. The result of the test shall be less than 8 mm at 10 cm measured using a Tc-99m source. Verification of (COR) Physicist Tests the COR offset, alignment of camera Y-axis, and head tilt with respect to the scanner center of rotation. Mean value of the COR offset should not exceed1/2 pixel (typically 2 mm) when measured at the center and edges of the FOV. Position of Y=0 axis and the Y gain shall be the same for all heads in a multi-head system. Photon Energy Analyzer Physicist The accuracy of the photon energy analyzer shall be within manufacturer specifications. Verifying this is typically part of daily QC. CT Attenuation map registration Medical physicist Shall confirm that the attenuation maps are registered to the SPECT images within the manufacturer specifications. This is typically performed using manufacturer-provided phantoms and procedures. 3.4. Subject Selection This activity describes criteria and procedures related to the selection of appropriate imaging subjects that are necessary to reliably meet the Profile Claim. 3.4.1 The study is contraindicated in patients with allergies or hypersensitivity reactions to ioflupane, the excipients in the formulation, or iodine, as about 120 mg of Iodine in the form of potassium iodide should be administered by mouth 0.5-to-2 hours prior to the intravenous administration of the 123I Rotation 123
tool, etc.) at the two timepoints (i.e., it is not required that the same scanner or image analysis tool be used for both exams of a patient). If one or more of the actors are the same, the implementation is still compliant with this Profile and it is expected that the measurement performance will be improved. To give a sense of the possible improvement, the following table presents expected precision for alternate scenarios, however except for the leftmost, these precision values are not Claims of this Profile. Table 1: Expected Precision for Alternate Scenarios (Informative) Different Acquisition Device Same Acquisition Device Different Radiologist Same Radiologist Different Radiologist Same Radiologist Different Analysis Tool Same Analysis Tool Different Analysis Tool Same Analysis Tool Different Analysis Tool Same Analysis Tool Different Analysis Tool Same Analysis Tool 47% 46% 33% 32% 38% 36% 13% 11% Notes: 1. Precision is expressed here as the total deviation index. 2. A measured change that exceeds the relevant precision value in the table indicates 95% confidence in the presence of a true change. 3. A 95% confidence interval for the magnitude of the true change is given by: ± the relevant precision value. 3. Profile Activities The Profile is documented in terms of “Actors” performing “Activities”. Equipment, software, staff or sites may claim conformance to this Profile as one or more of the “Actors” in the following table. Conformant Actors shall support the listed Activities by conforming to all requirements in the referenced Section. 1: Actors and Required Activities Actor Activity Section Acquisition Device Pre-delivery 3.1. Subject Handling 3.5. Image Data Acquisition 3.6. Technologist Subject Handling 3.5.
the lowest possible amount of radiation dose to the subject (e.g. a relatively low dose protocol) that retains the quantitative accuracy of corrections for attenuation. Technologist The key CT acquisition mode parameters (kVp, mAs, pitch, and collimation) shall be set as specified by study protocol and used consistently for all subject scans. Parameter Actor Requirement DICOM Tag CT Technique: Protocol Design Technologist / Physician / Medical Physicist A team comprising a Technologist / Physician / Medical Physicist shall ensure that CT techniques protocols are designed such that dose exposure is the lowest radiation dose necessary to achieve the objective. Protocols defined by Gently and Image Wisely should be used where feasible. The protocol shall be recorded and documented. Technologist The Technologist shall ensure that CT dose exposure is the lowest radiation dose necessary to achieve the objective . The technologist shall ensure that the CT dose conforms to the dose prescribed by the supervising physician or protocol. 3.6.2 Ancillary Equipment 3.6.2.1 Radionuclide Calibrator The following guidelines are collected from ANSI standard N42.13, 2004 and IAEA Technical Report Series TRS-454. All requirements assume measurements on unit doses of I-123 ioflupane and that calibration sources are in the 'syringe' geometry (i.e., no bulk doses). The Constancy test ensures reproducibility of an activity measurement over a long period of time by 698 measuring a long-lived source of known activity. The Accuracy test ensures that the activity values determined by the radionuclide calibrator are correct and traceable to national or international standards within reported uncertainties. The Linearity test confirms that, for an individual radionuclide, the same calibration setting can be applied to obtain the correct activity readout over the range of use for that radionuclide calibrator. Parameter Actor Requirement DICOM Tag Constancy Technologist Shall be evaluated daily (or after any radionuclide calibrator event) using a NIST-traceable (or equivalent)
2010;51:1624-1631, et al PLoS ONE sept 2014 Q. Section 3.6 CT parameters differ from Imaging Wisely guidelines Q. Concerns raised regarding collimator resolution requirements What do you mean by ‘Accurate separate definition of caudate and putamen’ FWHM < 10 mm : Manufacturer specified planar resolution vs. on-site measurement with I-123 test object Q. Dr. Klein suggested the need to tie the collimator resolution requirement to the SBR accuracy requirement in the phantom study specified in the profile. But difficult to do as there are several other factors that contribute to SBR accuracy. Q. 3.6.2 (Ancillary Equipment) and 3.6.3 (Phantom Imaging) that Zimmerman and John Dickson added to the Acquisition section (3.6) might be in the wrong plaqce, and possibly should be moved to 3.8 which is defined in the Table of Contents as Image QA. Closed Issues: The following issues have been considered closed by the biomarker committee. They are provided here to forestall discussion of issues that have already been raised and resolved, and to provide a record of the rationale behind the resolution. Q. Is this template open to further revisions? A. Yes. This is an iterative process by nature. Submit issues and new suggestions/ideas to the QIBA Process Cmte. Q. A. 1. Executive Summary Parkinsonism is a major health problem. Distinguishing Parkinson’s disease (PD) from other movement disorders that can mimic it has important implications for management. The goal of this QIBA Profile is to optimize the performance of Iodine-123 (123I) ioflupane single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for quantifying the concentration of regional cerebral dopamine transporters (DaT) in patients who are being evaluated for neurodegenerative disorders. The Claims (Section 2): This profile claims that compliance with its specifications will (1) produce cross sectional measurements of DaT that can distinguish patients with PD from matched controls, and (2) distinguish true biological change from measurement noise in clinical trials of patients with PD who will be studied longitudinally with 123I-ioflupane. Both claims are founded on observations that idiopathic
These documents will help facilities gather and organize information for periodic the site surveys. Some of the most common items that are not found during a survey are the following: • Policies for primary source verification, verifying that personnel are not included on the Office of Inspector General’s exclusion list and a consumer complaint notice that the patients contact information for the ACR (one can be found on our website at . • Documentation of initial qualifications, continued education and continued experience for the interpreting physician and medical physicist. Self-documentation is not acceptable. In the European (EU), the qualifications for interpreting physicians and medical physicists may be found at (add on-line citation here) . . . In and other regions, professional health care providers should meet, and maintain, standards set by their local regulatory authorities for the practice of medicine with unsealed radioactive material. Visual image assessment is performed to assess he adequacy of the acquisition for a quantitative endpoint. Checks for the integrity of the reconstruction include well-defined basal ganglia, nonspecific cortical uptake with sharp boundaries of the cortical edge, and well-defined scalp uptake. Signs of motion include blurring of the boundaries between high uptake areas in the basal ganglia and adjacent regions, e.g. the heads of the caudate may appear too close. Assessment of the quality of the subsequent quantitative analysis is critical, with particular on the accurate anatomic placing of the regions of interest. 3.11.2 Parameter Requirement count sufficiency nuclear medicine specialist or nuclear radiologist Shall confirm sufficient counts have been acquired to reconstruct the images properly clear, conspicuous margins Shall confirm the margins are sufficiently conspicuous and have not been degraded by excessive patient motion. Excessive motion Shall confirm that image quality has not been degraded by excessive patient motion. Proper positioning in FOV Shall confirm that basal ganglia are in the field of view by assessing where the top of the head is. artifacts Shall ensure assessment is not confounded by ring artifacts, artifacts related to too large a radius for COR (i.e., should be <15 cm, or edge artifacts Mis-registration of SPECT/CT or discordance of Chang’s Shall ensure that the attenuation map is visually registered to the CT map within one reconstructed voxel dimension.
PS 19 Anti-Hazing Partially Implemented Applies To: All Department Program Review Findings: Student record review indicates that Germaine Lawrence does not maintain evidence of the disciplinary code being distributed to students or evidence of each secondary school age student's receipt of a copy of the programs' anti-hazing disciplinary policy approved by the programs' Board of Directors. Description of Corrective Action: All students will recieve a copy of the student code of conduct, distributed at intake and annually thereafter. Title/Role(s) of Responsible Persons: Education Liaison Principal Program Managers Expected Date of Completion: 08/30/2013 Evidence of Completion of the Corrective Action: Acknowledgment forms will be used as evidence of completion. Description of Internal Monitoring Procedures: A tracking system will be developed to ensure the annual handout and the signed acknowledgement form will be kept in the students file. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN APPROVAL SECTION Criterion: PS 19 Anti-Hazing Corrective Action Plan Status: Approved Status Date: 07/09/2013 Basis for Partial Approval or Disapproval: Department Order of Corrective Action: Required Elements of Progress Report(s): Progress Report - Germaine Lawrence must submit a copy of the student code of conduct that contains the required anti-hazing law and relevant disciplinary policy. Second Progress Report - Germaine Lawrence must submit evidence that the student code of conduct was distributed at intake to any new student that was admitted to the program between 8/30/13 and 12/13/13. As part of the Department's unannounced visit, student files will also be reviewed to ensure that a signed receipt of the anti-hazing law and disciplinary policy is present in students' files. Progress Report Due Date(s): 08/30/2013 12/13/2013 PROGRAM REVIEW CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Criterion & Topic: PS 20 Bullying Prevention and Intervention PR Rating: Partially Implemented Applies To: All Department Program Review Findings:
Introduction ……………………………………………….… 3 Emergency Procedures ………………………………….... 4 Medical Emergencies ……………………………………… 6 Fire Emergencies …………………………………………... 7 Discharges: Petroleum - Bilge & Fuel Management …….. 10 Fueling ……………………………………... 10 Accidental Spills …………………………… 11 Bilge Discharges ………………………..…. 13 Oil Absorbent Materials ………………..…. 14 Aquatic Nuisance Species …………………………..…….. 15 Vessel (topside) Cleaning, Maintenance & Repair …….… 17 Underwater Boat Hull Cleaning ………………………….… 20 Marina Operations / Hazardous Materials ………….…….. 21 Marina Debris, Solid & Liquid Waste …………………....... 23 Pets ……………………………………………………….….. 24 Boat Sewage Discharge ………………………………….… 24 Fish Waste …………………………………………………… 25 Introduction October 2011 Dear Boater,
More Crusades: It was a short victory. Less than 50 years later, Muslims once again conquered Jerusalem. Again the pope called for a crusade to take back the city. The Second Crusade lasted from 1147-1149. It was not successful. The Crusade lasted from 1189-1192. It was not successful. The Fourth Crusade lasted from 1202-1204. Instead of attacking Jerusalem, the crusaders attacked Constantinople. They stole statues, money, paintings and jewelry. They burned libraries. They destroyed churches. Their ridiculous excuse was that they needed money to defend Constantinople from the same fate as Jerusalem, as well as to fund the rescue of Jerusalem. The people of Constantinople did not find this excuse acceptable, and they were filled with hatred for the west. The Children's Crusade in 1212 was a terrible tragedy. Many thousands of French and German children died trying to reach Jerusalem. They believed God would help them because they were children. Many died of hunger. Other froze to death. When the survivors reached the Mediterranean Sea, they expected the waters to part and let them pass. When this did not happen, those who were left returned dismally home. Over the next 70 years, there were several other crusade attempts, but they were motivated more by personal gain than by religious purpose. None succeeded. By 1291, 200 years after the first crusade, European leaders lost interest. Western Europe never admitted defeat. They simply stopped asking for new crusaders.
Teaching Lesson Plan Location #1: Cafeteria Location Rules: (from 4B chart) Positive Example: Non-example: and exit correctly -Enter the cafeteria in an orderly fashion -Students walk nicely and quietly to their assigned table -Students sit correctly in their assigned seat Pushing, shoving, skipping in line, yelling in line, and/or at assigned table Keep area clean at all times -Pick-up after themselves -Helping others keep the area tidy Leaving trash on the floor, condiments spilled over the table and/or floor, table left uncleaned Appropriate volume control Whispering (Level 1 voice) and/or speaking with peer across from you or next to you Screaming, shouting, banging, water bottles and/or popping Ziploc bags. List 2 resources (website addresses, curriculum with location, books with page numbers, programs with lesson plan number, etc.) you will use to teach this lesson plan. Be specific enough so the resources can be located by anyone. 1.Student code of conduct book 2.LEAPS Website: List the steps of this lesson plan (Include lesson format, activities, and materials). Be detailed enough so the lesson can be implemented by anyone. 1.Introduce expectations and 2.Discuss expectations and add student input 3. Staff model and practice behavior with students 4. 5. WHEN will this lesson plan be taught? Beginning of school year date(s) and time(s): August 21, 2017 – September 4, 2017 during classroom morning opener. After long holidays Use your quarterly team meetings to not only review and analyze your behavior data, but to plan and develop additional lesson plans you will use throughout the year to re-teach and reinforce this location’s rules. 3rd quarter
Compliance Online Ethics in the workplace CoE20180400036 April2018 – 2019 Dr Minette Smit minette@complianceonline.co. Compliance Online Financial Intelligence Centre Act (FICA): CoE20180400037 April2018 – 2019 Dr Minette Smit minette@complianceonline.co. Compliance Online King IV and Corporate Governance training CoE20180400038 April2018 – April 2019 Dr Minette Smit minette@complianceonline.co. Compliance Online National Credit Act (NCA) training CoE20180400039 April2018 – April 2019 Dr Minette Smit minette@complianceonline.co. Compliance Online Occupational Health and Safety training CoE20180400040 April2018 – 2019 Dr Minette Smit minette@complianceonline.co. Compliance Online Protection of Personal Information Act (POPI CoE20180400041 April2018 – 2019 Dr Minette Smit minette@complianceonline.co. Compliance Online Social Media in the workplace CoE20180400042 April2018 – April 2019 Dr Minette Smit minette@complianceonline.co. African Risk Management Compliance ISO27001 Certified ISMS Foundation ARE20180300027 March – March 2019 Saldys.sheriff@africariskmanagers.com African Risk Management Compliance ISO27001 Certified ISMS Foundation Auditor Course ARE20180300028 Saldys.sheriff@africariskmanagers.com
• Comparing two or more sets of information Working with a group to identify alternative solutions to a problem • Consolidating data from various sources and identify/interpret trends • Identifying and interpreting regulatory risk trends • Managing stakeholder expectations • Monitoring adherence and compliance • Managing multiple projects • Interacting with diverse people • Working across all risk categories • Presenting to senior leaders Minimum Experience Level Must have a minimum of 5 years’ compliance experience with exposure to implementing methodology and performing compliance monitoring Technical / Professional Knowledge •Banking knowledge •Banking procedures •Business Acumen •Change management •Cluster specific operations •Compliance reporting •Governance, Risk and Controls •Industry trends •Microsoft Office •Nedbank policies and procedures •Nedbank vision and strategy •Principles of project management •Relevant regulatory knowledge •Relevant software and systems knowledge •Reputational risk management •Risk management process and frameworks •Stakeholder management •Business writing skills • Codes of Good Governance Behavioural Competencies •Adaptability •Applied Learning •Communication •Decision Making •Tenacity
Compare / Contrast Rubric Key Traits 3 (Strong) 2 (Average) 1 (Weak) IDEAS • The writer orients the reader by clearly stating the subjects being compared and contrasted. • The thesis statement is clear and focused and identifies similarities and differences. • Relevant details and examples support each similarity and/or difference. • The writer connects solid examples to defend the thesis in thoughtful ways. • The writer somewhat orients the reader by stating the subjects being compared and contrasted. • The thesis statement is too broad or too narrow, but loosely identifies similarities and differences. • Details and examples support most similarities and/or differences. • The writer connects examples to defend the thesis in adequate ways. • The writer does not state the subjects being compared and contrasted. • The thesis statement is unclear or missing; it does not identify similarities and differences. • Details and examples are irrelevant or missing and do not support similarities and/or differences. • The writer does not connect examples to defend the thesis. • The tone and voice are appropriate for the purpose and audience. • The writing reflects active engagement • The tone and voice are acceptable for the purpose and audience but not strongly individual or direct. • The writing lacks • The voice lacks individuality and is not concerned with or not matched to the audience. • The writing is lifeless or mechanical
with the topic. consistent engagement with the topic. and reflects no engagement with the topic. CONVENTIONS • Spelling, capitalization, and punctuation are generally correct. • Grammar and usage are correct. • Paragraphing is correct and reinforces organization. • Spelling, capitalization, and punctuation are sometimes uneven. • Grammar and usage do not distort meaning but are not always correct. • Paragraphing is attempted but is not always sound. • Spelling, capitalization, and punctuation are frequently incorrect. • Grammar and usage mistakes are frequent and distort meaning. • Paragraphing is missing, irregular, or too frequent.
Observation of classrooms and other facilities: a sample of ten instructional classrooms and other school facilities used in the delivery of programs and services was visited to examine general levels of compliance with program requirements. The report includes findings in the program areas reviewed organized under nine components. These components are: Component I: Assessment of Students Component II: Student Identification and Program Placement Component III: Parent and Community Involvement Component IV: Curriculum and Instruction Component V: Student Support Services Component VI: Faculty, Staff and Administration Component VII: Facilities Component VIII: Program Evaluation Component IX: Recordkeeping and Fund Use The findings in each program area explain the “ratings,” determinations by the team about the implementation status of the criteria reviewed. The ratings indicate those criteria that were found by the team to be substantially “Implemented” or implemented in a “Commendable” manner. (Refer to the “Definition of Compliance Ratings” section of the report.) Where criteria were found to be either "Partially Implemented" or "Not Implemented," the district or charter school must propose to the Department corrective actions to bring those areas into compliance with the controlling statute or regulation. Districts are expected to incorporate the corrective action into their district and school improvement plans, including their professional development plans. AUBURN PUBLIC SCHOOLS SUMMARY OF COMPLIANCE CRITERIA INCLUDED IN THIS REPORT REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM AREA PARTIALLY IMPLEMENTED NOT IMPLEMENTED OTHER CRITERIA REQUIRING RESPONSE English Learner Education ELE 5 NOTE THAT ALL OTHER CRITERIA REVIEWED BY THE DEPARTMENT THAT ARE NOT MENTIONED ABOVE HAVE RECEIVED AN “IMPLEMENTED” OR “NOT APPLICABLE” RATING.
Galaxy Middle School Testing Calendar Spring 2017 Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday April 10 8th ELA/Reading Session 1 April 11 8th ELA/Reading Session 2 April 12 6th ELA/Reading Session 1 April 13 6th ELA/Reading Session 2 April 14 FSA Make-ups AM ONLY April 17 7th ELA/Reading Session 1 April 18 7th ELA/Reading Session 2 April 19 6th Math Session 1 20 6th Math Sessions 2 & 3 21 FSA Make-ups AM ONLY April 24 7th Math Session 1 April 25 7th Math Sessions 2 & 3 April 26 8th Math Session 1 April 27 8th Math Sessions 2 & 3 April 28 FSA Make-ups AM ONLY May 1 8th Grade Science PBT 2 Sessions 80 minutes each Begin FAIR AP3 6th and 7th Only May 2 FSA Make-ups May 3 May 4 May 5 2016 End-Of-Course-Exams Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday May 8 Algebra & Geometry FAIR AP3 6th, 7th and 8th May 9 May 10 Algebra & Geometry Make-ups May 11 May 12 May 15 Civics Group 1 May 16 Civics Group 2 May 17 Civics 3 May 18 Civics Make-ups May 19 Civics Make-ups May 22 May 23 May 24 May 25 May 26 Student’s Last Day!
2017 TETRATHLON FACT SHEET MASTERSON STATION PARK, LEXINGTON, KY June 17 - 18, 2017 OPENING DATE: May 23, 2017 CLOSING DATE: May 30, 2917 COMPLETE ENTRIES and FEES (club or center member check payable to MidSouth Region, USPC) to: Laurie Massa 1950 Beaumont Road (859)797-0102 Nicholasville, KY 40356 Lauriemassa@gmail.com Division Cert level or Above Age Swimming Running Shooting Riding (Max.) Senior* C1 16 and up 200 yards 3000 meters 20 hand - timed 3’3’’ Junior* D3 13-16 200yards 2000 meters 20 shots/1 hand - slow fire 3’0’’ Intermediate* D3 or above 13 and up 100 yards 1000 meters 20 shots/1 hand - slow fire 2’9’’ Novice* D3 or above 11-12 100 1000 meters 20 shots/2 hands - slow fire 2’6” Pre-Novice D2 or above 13 and under 50 yards 500 meters 20 hands - slow fire 2’3’’ 11 & Up D1 or above 11 and up 100 yards 1000 meters 10 shots/2 hands – slow fire 18” 10 & Under D1 or 10 and under 50 500 meters 10 - slow fire sitting or resting 18” 8 & Under UR/D1 8 and under 25 yards 500 meters 10 shots/resting - slow fire sitting or resting Ground poles Qualifying Divisions: *Senior, Junior, Intermediate &Novice divisions will be required to do ‘slip rail’ and ‘gate’ in the riding phase.
S/No Status/Rank Date Employer/Address/Phone No./ Email Address 1 2 3 SUMMARY OF APPLICANT’S PRODUCTIVITY/RESEARCH IMPACT Total Number of Peer – reviewed Publications Number of Publications in ISI Journals Number of Publications in other Journals Monographs/ Book Chapters h-index from (Google Scholar) or Harzigs Total Citations No. of patents attached To confirm presence of Journal in ISI Master list, go to: http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/mjl/ APPLICANT’S PRODUCTIVITY/RESEARCH IMPACT List below, ten (10) most significant Publications (beginning with latest) contributing to the scientific breakthrough for which the award is being sought (enclose reprints in the order listed in all copies of your submission). Note that provision of wrong information here will automatically lead to disqualification of candidate.
L U T I O N S Current Levels: Next Steps Continue current plan Modify plan Discontinue plan Notes: new problem table(s) as needed] Organizational/Housekeeping Task List Item Discussion Decisions and Tasks Who? By When? Evaluation of Team Meeting (Mark your ratings with an “X”) Our Rating Yes So-So No 1. Was today’s meeting a good use of our time? 2. In general, did we do a good job of tracking whether we’re completing the we agreed on at previous meetings? 3. In general, have we done a good job of actually completing the tasks we agreed on at previous meetings? 4. In general, are the completed tasks having the desired effects on student behavior?
[INSERT LOGO HERE] ___________________Tier I Team Meeting Minutes School: Enrollment: Meetings Date Time and end) Location Facilitator Minute Taker Data Data Analyst Meeting Next Meeting Team Members & Attendance (Place “X” to left of name if present) Today’s Agenda Items: Agenda for Next Meeting 4. 1. 5. 2. 6. 3. Monitoring Implementation Fidelity Measures/ Basic Reports Data Collection Schedule Goal and Current Scores Measure: Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI). Fidelity Checklists at each Tier (define here) Reports: TFI subscale Report Rating Scales-staff perception Full TFI fall & spring. go here) TFI-Focus Tier, I, II, III completed mid-year (date goes here) Rating scale at least twice a month Goal: Aim for 70% on TFI Current Scores Tier I = Tier II = Tier III = Progress Monitoring: Student Outcomes Tier I Measure: SWIS Basic Reports: SWIS Use Average Per Day Per Month Report, Referrals by Student Report ODRs are collected daily and entered into SWIS at least twice a week Average per day per month & Comparison to national media Trends and Peaks Increasing or decreasing trend? Any month(s) have higher frequency % of students with 0-1 major ODR Aim for 80-85% % of students with 2-5 major ODRs Aim for 10-15% % of students with 6+ major ODRs Aim for 1=5% Tier II Measure: CICO-SWIS Basic Reports: I-SWIS School Wide Report (includes CICO Summary) Daily Point Cards are collected daily. Data are entered into CICO-SWIS at least twice a week Students served with Tier 2 support N = % of enrollment = Progressing (all good) N = In First Two Weeks N = Students of Concern 3
Student Initials/ID & Start Date Precise Problem Statement & Current Level Include Who, what, when, how often, & why Goal what will change, by how much, by when Current compared to goal Fidelity of Implementation Student Outcomes & Updates Response Actions Tasks Who? By When? In first six weeks of intervention Current Level: ____________ Partial implementation Implemented with fidelity Stopped No Change Improved but Not to Goal Met Goal Maintain plan BrB adaptation Phase change Refer to Tier III Team Discontinue Other In first six weeks of intervention Current ____________ Partial implementation Implemented with fidelity Stopped Worse No Change Improved but Not to Goal Met Goal Maintain plan BrB adaptation Phase Change Refer to Tier III Team Discontinue Other New Referrals to Tier II Support Student Initials/ID Grade level IEP Y/N Teacher Referral Date Referral Source Precision Problem Statement Include who, what, where, when, how often, & why Response Actions Initiated By Projected start date Goal Include what will change, by how much, by when Fidelity of Implementation Schedule
Student Initials/ID Grade IEP Y/N Precise Problem Statement & Current Level Include Who, what, where, when, how often, & why Goal & Timeline Fidelity of Implementation Outcomes/Updates Response Actions Tasks Who? By When? Partial implementation Implemented with fidelity Stopped Getting started action plan in progress Plan in & in first six weeks of implementation Worse No Change Improved, not to Goal Met Goal Maintain plan Phase Change Discontinue Individual Student Action Plans Student Grade level IEP Team Coordinator FBA BSP I –SWIS Implementation Notes File set up JT/3rd/ no IEP AT Done 3/31/17 Done 4/5/17 Complete by 4/8/17 Complete by 4/11/17 Start 4/10/17 EP/ 5th/IEP JS Done 4/4/17 Complete by 4/11/17 Complete by 4/11/17 Complete by 4/13/17 Start 4/17/17 Tier 3 (Individual) New Referrals Possible sources: SWIS data, teacher nomination, Request for Assistance form Standard procedure: Referral, family contact, functional assessment determination, Student Support Team defined, support plan developed, implementation Student Initials/ID Grade Teacher IEP Y/N Referral Date Referral Source & Relevant Information Response Actions & Next Steps Who? By When? Goal & Timeline Fidelity of Implementation Outcomes/ Updates Create Individual Student Team Gather more data
There is significant concern regarding mental health issues, anti-social behavior, or serious concerns about family support Student’s behavior poses a potential risk to self or others. Student has an IEP Teacher and/or family request Use goals defined in student support plan After documenting fidelity of implementation Retain intervention for at least 6 weeks of success or upward trend toward goal Modify intervention if after two weeks of implementation, there is no improvement Fade supports to an individualized self management system or Tier II In Check Out system when student has been successful 4 days a week (80% of time) for at least 6 weeks