zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Clean Sweep Sponsors Champaign Co. Farm Bureau 801 N. Country Fair Dr. Ste D Champaign, IL 61821 Champaign Co. SWCD 2110 W. Park Court, Ste C Champaign, IL 61821 University of IL Ext. Champaign 801 Co. Fair Dr. Suite D Champaign, IL 61911 DeWitt Co. Farm Bureau 1060 State Route 54 West Clinton, IL 61727 DeWitt Co. SWCD 5920 Revere Road Clinton, IL 61727 University of IL Ext. DeWitt 8425 Katie Road Clinton, IL 61727 Ford Co. Farm Bureau 1381 S Crescent St. Gilman, IL 60938 Ford Co. SWCD 1380 W. Ottawa Rd. Paxton, IL 60957 University of IL Ext. Ford 916 W Seminary Ave Onarga, IL 60955 Iroquois Co. Farm Bureau 1381 S Crescent St. Gilman, IL 60938 Iroquois Co. SWCD 1001 E. Grant St. Ste A Watseka, IL 60970 Univ. of IL Ext. Iroquois Co. 916 W. Seminary Ave. Onarga, IL 60955 Livingston Co. Farm Bureau 901 W Howard St. Pontiac, IL 61764 Livingston Co. SWCD 1510 W. Reynolds Pontiac, IL 61764 University of IL Ext. Livingston 1412 S Locust Pontiac, IL McLean Co. Farm Bureau 2242 Westgate Dr Bloomington, IL 61705 McLean Co. SWCD 402 N. Kays Dr. Normal, IL 61761 University of IL Ext. McLean 632 Orlando Ave. Normal, IL 61761 Piatt Co. Farm Bureau 427 W Marion St. Monticello, IL 61856 Piatt Co. SWCD 1209 Bear Lane Monticello, IL 61856 University of IL Ext. Piatt 210 S. Market Street Monticello, IL 61856 Vermilion Co. Farm Bureau 1905 Rte 150 W #C Danville, IL 61832 Vermilion Co. SWCD 1905-A US Rte 150 Danville, IL 61832 University of IL Ext. Vermilion 3164 North Vermilion Danville, IL 61832 Champaign Co. Reg.Planning Com. 1776 E. Washington St. Urbana, IL 61802 ###
Academic Affairs Committee Minutes Meeting reference: Session 2016/17, Meeting 3 of 3 Date and time: Wednesday 17 May 2017, at 2.00pm Location: Room 19, Brahan Members present: Margaret Munckton Principal and Chief Executive (Chair) Dr Harold Gillespie, Board of Management Rep (Vice Chair) Brian Crichton of management David Gourley Curriculum & Business Engagement Director Dawne Hodkinson International & Corporate Services Director Deborah Lally Head of Student Records Donald Maclean Support Staff Representative Jane Edwards Support Staff Representative Jessica Borley Head of Quality, Chair of Quality Enhancement Committee Holly Scrimgeour PC Students’ Association Representative Pam Wilson Vice Principal Academic Richard Ogston Head of Student Services Rachel Daniel Vice President PCSA, Education and Engagement Roy Anderson Head of Academic Practice Sharon McGuire Teaching Staff Board Member In attendance Barbara Nelson, Education Scotland Apologies: Professor Martin Price, Chair of Research, Scholarship and Knowledge Exchange Committee Minute Taker: Maureen Masson Quorum: 8, including the Chair or Vice-Chair Summary of Action Ref Action Responsibility Time Line Carry Forward from 17 May 2017 6 Presentation - Clerk Immediate
Where Complaints come from Complaints may come from any person, or anyone acting directly on behalf of that person or an organisation that has a legitimate interest in the work of the National Guardian Office. A complaint can be received verbally, by phone, by email or in writing. What we cannot look into We cannot investigate individual whistleblowing cases, look at the merits of such cases, or provide a remedy for them NHS Trusts, workers can raise concerns using their local whistleblowing policy. You can find more details at the following link: http://www.cqc.org.uk/content/other-organisations-contact-advice-or-raise-concerns We cannot review complaints made about adult social care or independent healthcare providers. We will not look into complaints connected with contractual or commercial disputes involving the National Guardian’s office. Confidentiality All complaint information will be handled sensitively, telling only those who need to know and following any relevant data protection requirements. How to make a complaint Written complaints can be sent to the National Guardian at the National Guardian Office, 151 Buckingham Palace Road, London SW1W 9SZ or by e-mail at enquiries@nationalguardianoffice.org.uk. You can also call our Customer service centre on 0300 067 9000 or talk to a member of staff at one of our events. Any complaints made in the person will be followed up, to record consent and clarify nature of complaint. Resolving Complaints
ISO 16949:2016 Lead Auditor Course 5 days training program DAY 1 0830 - 1800 Hours TIME SUBJECT 0830 – 0900 Introduction among delegates Tutors use outputs from the ICE BREAKER session to determine where to place emphasis as the course unfolds 0900 – 0930 Course IRCA introduction Notes for delegates Course objectives 0930 – 1015 Exercise 1: Risk-Based Thinking Team formation by Tutor-in-charge Appointment of Team Leader Team Discussion Document results of team discussion using flip charts/whiteboard/LCD Open Discussion Tutor-in-charge summarized accordingly& select champion team 1015 – 1030 Tea 1030 – 1230 Chapter 1: The IATF QMS IATF Approach: AL BasedDiscussion 1230 – 1330 1330 – 1430 Chapter 2: Auditing the IATF IATF 16949 Approach: Based Presentation 1430 – 1530 Exercise 2: Audit Team formation by Tutor-in-charge Appointment of Team Leader Team Discussion 1530– 1545 Tea 1545 – 1800 Exercise 2: Planning Document results of team discussion using flip charts/whiteboard/LCD Presentation by each group’s Team Leader (group members shall support presentation, where necessary) Tutor-in-charge summarized accordingly 1800 End of Day 1 DAY 2 0830 - 1800 Hours TIME SUBJECT 0830 – 0900 Daily Course Recapitulation & Students Feedback Recapitulation of previous day training program against training objectives Students feedback for continual improvement on training approach 0900 – 1015 Chapter 3: Documentation of IATF IATF Approach: Based Presentation 1015 – 1030 Tea 1030 – 1230 Exercise 3: Documented Information Review Role Play (Stage 1 Audit) Team formation by Tutor-in-charge Appointment of Team Leader Team Discussion & Role-Play 1230 – 1330
1330 – 1515 Exercise 3: Documented Information Review Role Play (Stage 1 Audit) (Continue) Team Discussion & Role-Play 1515 – 1530 Tea Break 1530 – 1800 Exercise 3: Documented Information Review Role Play (Stage 1 Audit) (Continue) Team Discussion & Role-Play Observers’ feedback Tutor-in-charge summarized accordingly 1800 End of Day 2 DAY 3 0830 - 1800 Hours TIME SUBJECT 0830 – 0900 Daily Course Recapitulation & Students Feedback Recapitulation of previous day training program against training objectives Students feedback for continual improvement on training approach 0900 – 1015 Chapter 4: Planning & Conducting The IATF QMS Audit – The Responsibilities & Activities Approach: Presentation 1015 – 1030 Tea 1030 – 1230 Chapter 4: Planning & Conducting The IATF QMS Audit – The Responsibilities & Activities (Continued) Approach: Based Presentation 1230 – 1330 1330 – 1430 Chapter 5: Audit Approach: Based Presentation 1430 – 1515 Exercise 4: Audit Checklist Team formation by Tutor-in-charge Appointment of Team Leader Team Discussion 1515 – 1530 Tea 1530 – 1800 Exercise 4: Audit Checklist Preparation Team Discussion Document results of team discussion using flip charts/whiteboard/LCD Presentation by each group’s Team Leader (group members shall support presentation, where necessary) summarized accordingly 1800 End of Day 3 DAY 4 0830 - 1800 Hours TIME SUBJECT
Macau Hong Kong Trophy Day simulcast races Grand Lisboa Cup (Macau Group 3) - 1500M Turf Saturday, 20 May 2017 Taipa Racecourse, MAC S1 Race 2 - 2:35 P.M. 13 Starters Declarations and Barrier Draws Saddle Cloth No./ Gear/ Horse Name Draw/ Current Domestic Rating/ Wt.(lb)/ Sex/ Age/ Trainer Jockey 1 B Perfect Alloy (AUS) 7 95 130 G 5 K C H Lam 2 B Lucky Winston (AUS) 9 94 129 G 6 K S Cheong Martin Wepner 3 B Oh So Easy (AUS) 3 86 121 G 6 K S Wong Zac Purton 4 B/TT Grand Double Win (NZ) 6 79 116 ?+2 G 5 Y C Fung W L Ho 5 CP Lucky And Wealthy (AUS) 1 76 116 ?+2 G 8 Geoff Allendorf Joao Moreira 6 PC Northern Legend (AUS) 5 75 116 ?+2 G 6 Joe Lau C F Chan 7 B Hopefully Tomorrow (AUS) 8 71 116 ?+2 G 5 K S Cheong Charles Perkins 8 B Mission Gdragon (AUS) 11 71 116 ?+2 C 4 Pat Lee R Maia 9 B New Classicism (IRE) 10 71 116 ?+2 G 4 K S Ho Akash Aucharuz 10 XB Sixth Sense (IRE) 2 70 116 ?+2 C 4 Leyshan Wayne Smith 11 H Benson (IRE) 4 66 116 ?+2 G 4 Peter Leyshan Andrew Calder 12 V Capital Protector (AUS) 12 66 116 ?+2 G 4 K S Cheong K H Yu 13 H Wonder Holy (IRE) 13 64 116 ?+2 G 5 K C Martin Cangas C = G = B = Blinkers; CP = Sheepskin Cheek Piece; H = Hood; PC = Pacifier with cowls; TT = Tongue Tie; V = Visor; XB = Crossed Nose Band B = CP = H = PC = TT = V = XB = ?+2 = Declared a probable 2 lbs overweight ?+2 = Macau Hong Kong Trophy Day simulcast races Hong Kong Trophy (Macau Group 1) - 1500M Turf Saturday, 20 May 2017 Taipa Racecourse, MAC S1 Race 3 - 3:10 P.M. 7 Starters
Moon Walker (AUS) 1/14 22Apr17 Class 5 & 6 Handicap 40-0 HKD200,000 TAI, MAC 1800 RH Turf S 124 Ryan Curatolo 9 6 6 6 1 1-3/4 10 B Windsor Arch (AUS) Power Savabeel (NZ) Haayil Shadow (AUS) ( ) Current Domestic Rating
Commission believes that improving the representation of cultural diversity in leadership and in the media would strengthen Australia’s multiculturalism. Australians benefit from a clearer understanding of what is meant by multiculturalism – both in theory and in practice. This could develop from a more comprehensive civics education, including through the formal school curriculum. Parliament may also be well positioned to clarify the meaning of multiculturalism in Australia. The Commission has an institutional and legislated role in strengthening Australia’s commitment to anti-discrimination within a human rights framework. The Commission receives and investigates complaints from individuals who allege that their human rights have been breached or that they have been discriminated against in an area of public life such as employment or education, including with respect to race. The Commission also engages in a range of programs and activities to challenge discrimination and uphold race relations and community harmony. Recommendations Recommendation 1: That the Government continue to support a policy of multiculturalism as a means of promoting social cohesion, cultural harmony and national unity. Recommendation 2: That the Government consider strengthening the policy machinery of Australian multiculturalism, including through the establishment of an Office of Multicultural Affairs. Recommendation 3: That the Government recognise the importance of maintaining effective protections against racial discrimination and hatred in setting a standard for public conduct in a multicultural society. Recommendation 4: That the Government investigate ways of collecting more comprehensive data on racially motivated crimes. An appropriate government authority, such as the Australian Institute of Criminology, be mandated to collect and report on national data. Recommendation 5: That the Government recognise that Australian race relations and community harmony can be profoundly influenced by the tone of public debate about immigration, multiculturalism and national security. Recommendation 6: That the Government investigate ways of collecting more comprehensive data on issues concerning multiculturalism, including with respect to cultural diversity in Australian workplaces. Recommendation 7: That the Government consider strengthening public education about multiculturalism, including through the school curriculum. Recommendation 8: That the Parliament consider periodic public statements, which can affirm parliamentarians’ recognition of a multicultural Australia.
III-B (ii)) Articles/Chapters Published in Books/Extention Mannual (Agri.)/Tech.Mannual(Agri.): S. No Chapter with page nos. Book title & Publisher ISSN/ISBN No. Whether peer reviewed. Whether you are the first author or No. of API Score III (C). Research Project : III (C) (i) Sponsored Project : S.No. Title Agency Period Amount of (In Lac) API Score III (C) (ii) Consultancy Project : S.No. Title Agency Period Amount mobilized with (In Lac) API Score III (C) (iii) Project Outcome/Output : Major Policy document prepared for international bodies like WHO/UNO/ UNESCO/UNICEF etc. Central / State Govt./Local Bodies API Score
Examination Name of the Board/ University Year of passing Percentage of Marks obtained Div./ Subjects High School/ Matric Intermediate/+2 Graduation Professional Graduation Post Graduation Other examinations / Super- Specialization, if any Research Degree(s) Degree Title Date of Award University M.Phil/M.Tech./M.Pharm /MD/MS/MDS/DNB/LL.M Ph.D./D.Phil. D.Sc./D.Lit Appointments (including Post Doctoral Positions such as Research Scientist, Research Associate etc.) held to joining BHU. Designation Name of Employer Date of Salary with PB + AGP Reason of leaving Joining Leaving Posts held after appointments at BHU. Designation Department Date Salary with PB + AGP From To Post Doctoral Research experience (as Research Scientist, Research Associate etc.) (in years) Fields of specialization :
III (B) (i). Books Published as Single Author or Co-Author/ Editor of a Book or Journal: with page nos. Type of Book & Authorship/ e-Book Publisher & ISSN/ISBN No. Whether peer reviewed Authorship: Sole No. of API III-B (ii)) Articles/Chapters Published in Books/Extention Mannual (Agri.)/Tech.Mannual(Agri.): S. No Chapter title with page nos. Book title & Publisher ISSN/ISBN No. Whether peer reviewed. Whether you are the first author or No. of API Score III (C). Research Project : III (C) (i) Sponsored Project : S.No. Title Agency Period Amount of Grant (In Lac) API Score III (C) (ii) Consultancy Project :
The little girl was crushed. She began to cry and ran out of the room. That was when his wife explained to him that the little girl had given him that box because she said she was putting all her love inside – wrapping it up for her daddy. Yes, sometimes, even parents are not worthy of their children’s devotion. 2 Samuel 23 has a way of keeping the reality of our failures very much before us. If you will look closely at this chapter, you will find a long list of names that are difficult to pronounce. These are the names of David’s Mighty Men. They are sometimes categorized under groups of 3, or 30 or 37 in all. Yet note that after you’ve waded through the Harodites in vs. 25 and the Hararites in vs. 33, and even the Ithrites in vs. 38, you come to the very last name of these mighty men in vs. 39: Uriah the Hittite.
Policy: Section/Paragraph/Page: Comment: Circle One: Support Support with comments Oppose Policy: Section/Paragraph/Page: Comment: Circle One: Support Support with comments Oppose Policy: Section/Paragraph/Page: Comment: Circle One: Support Support with comments Oppose Policy: Section/Paragraph/Page: Comment: Circle One: Support Support with comments Oppose Policy: Section/Paragraph/Page: Comment: Circle One: Support Support with comments Oppose
By-laws Making and amending By-laws The Directors may from time to time make By-laws which in their opinion are necessary or desirable for the control, administration and management of the Club's affairs and may amend, repeal and replace those By-laws. The Club in general meeting, may amend, repeal and replace any By-law made by the Directors, but that does not affect the validity of anything previously done by the Directors or anyone under that By-law. Effect of By-law A By-law: is subject to this Constitution; must be consistent with this Constitution; and when in force, is binding on all Members and has the same effect as a provision in this Constitution. Seals Safe custody of common The Directors must provide for the safe custody of any seal of the Club. Use of common seal If the Club has a common seal or duplicate common seal: it may be used only by the authority of the Directors; and every document to which it is affixed must be signed by a Director and be countersigned by another Director or another person appointed by the Directors to countersign that document or a class of documents in which that document is included or as otherwise authorised under the Act. Funds Source of Funds The funds of the Club are to be derived from fees paid by Members and any other sources the Directors determine. Funds management The funds of the Club are to be used solely for the purposes specified in rule 2.1 in any manner the Directors determine. Inspection and copying of and access to records Inspection by Members Subject to the Act, the Directors may determine whether and to what extent, and at what times and places and under what conditions, the financial
Agenda Capacity Trading Platform Project Team Meeting No. 6 Date/Time: Tuesday, 30 May 2017, 9am-11 am joint meeting Tuesday, 30 May 2017, 11 am – 4 pm face to face meeting Location: AEMO Bondi Room, Level 2, 20 Bond St, Sydney Attendees: Project team Kieran O’Leary, AGL Leach, DBP Andrew Zancanaro, Jemena Lino Fusco, CQ Partners David Lawrence, Pacific Markets Consulting Craig Memory, PIAC Ishara De Silva, EnergyAustralia Jennifer Tarr, Stanwell GMRG Warren Vosper, analyst Daniel specialist technical advisor Katherine Lowe, senior technical advisor Sandra Gamble, facilitator Apologies: Purpose: Capacity trading platform product design Item Presenter Time on previous meeting 11.10 am Reflections of the project team members Minutes of the previous meeting and action list Transfer of information from other working groups All WV SG/KL Confirm in principle agreement for product design 11.30 am Product types and firmness Contract paths Minimum MDQ parcel and MHQ factor Any other product design elements All Capacity trading zones 11.50 am Options considered by the standardisation team KL AEMO presentation 12.10 am Introduction to Trayport Introduction to the Exchange Agreement Fees Operational transfers vs locational swaps Registration process Interactions with other markets (STTM, DWGM, GSH) All Break 1.00 pm Light lunch and optional walk All AEMO presentation (continued discussion) 1.30 pm Project team road map 3:30 pm Road map, priorities, staging, next Information needs: articles, reports, guest speakers? Meeting schedule KL All SG Close 4.00 pm Next meetings:
Carson Cass Castro Childress Clay Cochran Coke Coleman Collingsworth Colorado Comanche Concho Cooke Cottle Crane Crockett Crosby Culberson Dallam Dawson Deaf Smith Delta DeWitt Dickens Dimmit Donley Duval Eastland Edwards Erath Falls Fannin Fayette Fisher Floyd Foard Franklin Freestone Frio Gaines Garza Gillespie Glasscock Goliad Gonzales Gray Grimes Hale Hall Hamilton Hansford Hardeman Hartley Haskell Hemphill Hill Hockley Hopkins Houston Howard Hudspeth Hutchinson Irion Jack Jackson Jasper Jeff Jim Hogg Jim Wells Jones Karnes Kenedy Kent Kimble King Kinney Kleberg Knox La Salle Lamb Lampasas Lavaca Lee Leon Limestone Lipscomb Live Oak Llano Loving Lynn Madison Marion Martin Mason Matagorda McCulloch McMullen Medina Menard Milam Mills Mitchell Montague Moore Motley Navarro Newton Nolan Ochiltree Oldham Palo Pinto Panola Parmer Pecos Polk Presidio Rains Reagan Real Red River Reeves Refugio Roberts Robertson Runnels Sabine San Augustine San Jacinto San Saba Schleicher Scurry Shackelford Shelby Sherman Somervell Stephens Sterling Stonewall Sutton Swisher Terrell Terry Throckmorton Trinity Upton Uvalde Val Verde Ward Wharton Wheeler Wilbarger Willacy Winkler Yoakum Young Zapata Zavala Fiscal Quarter Quarter Months Quarterly Monitoring Baseline Report HHSC Generated Report Due Date (New) Milestone / Health Plan Remedies Q3 MAR* APR MAY Testing (PCP / Main Dentist) July 2017 Mar 2017 Contract effective PCP and Main Dentist Analysis Complete Q4 JUN* JUL AUG x Oct 2017 Distance and Travel Time Baseline Complete (selected Provider Types) Q1 SEPT* OCT NOV Jan 2018 Distance and Travel Time Baseline Complete
VIKING LIFE SAVING EQUIPMENT Al Shipdocking Yard P.O.Box 13448 Dubai UAE Tel:+97143243555 Fax:+971143243444 E-mail:viking-uae@viking-life.com Contact:Jose Jacob ANCHORMARINE EQUIPMENT CO.LLC King Faisal Ext. Industrial Area 1, Sharjah United Arab Emirates Tel:+97165332443 Fax:+97165336023 Mobile:+971501011512 E-mail: amec@anchormarine.ae catherine.uson@anchormarine.ae Contact: Catherine Ann Uson HARDING SAFETY NETHERLANDS BV(DUBAI BRANCH) off no.701, DMC Marine building, Maritime City, Dubai, UAE, PO NO: 122236 Tel:+97144520446/55 Mobile:+971526303444 raveesh.nataraja@harding.no Contact: Raveesh Nataraja Jiangsu Jiaoyan Marine Equipment Co.,Ltd. Company Country Service area Contacting ShipGuard Middle East U.A.E. U.A.E. Tel:+81647070102 Fax:+81647070103 Email:inspection@ship-guard.com Contact:S.Omori DOLPHIN MARINE CO 104 bank street bur dubai,dubai,UAE el:+97143887199 Fax:+97143887156 Mobile:+971 562598829 Email: info@dolphin-marine.net Hussien Elbagouri Mr.Sherif Abdel Moniem Techno Marine Equipment Services LLC STREET NO. 37, INDUSTRIAL AREA NO.11, NEAR NATIONAL PAINTS, P.O.BOX : UNITED ARAB EMIRATES. Tel:+97165354777 E-mail:technomarine@eim.ae Contact:Mr. Srinivas Shenoy Marine Equipment & Services Co. Thalaba Dist, Neel Street P.O Box: 16679 Jeddah 21474 Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia Tel:+966-2-6367897 E-mail:info@mesest.com; deya_am@hotmail.com;safety@mesest.com Contact:Mr.
TOP Ltd. 346720,st.Gagarin 2, Rostov Region,Russia Tel: +7 86 350 42 753 Mob:+79281346451 Contact: Denis Larikov European Agencies & Maritime Works 78 ELBAHARIA ST, P.O.BOX: 519 ELMANSHIA, ALEXANDRIA,, EGYPT Egypt Tel:+1-310-549-8030 Email:ameen@eamw.net/moh-farid@eamw.net Contact:Mr.Ameen Sharaf DOLPHIN MARINE CO 66 ELTAWENIATE SMOUHA ALEXANDRIA, EGYPT Tel:+2034252179 Fax::+2034257114 Mob:+201068830786/+971562862928 E-mail:info@dolphin-marine.net Contact: Mr. Hussien Elbagouri Jiangsu Jiaoyan Marine Equipment Co.,Ltd.
that could be sold in the auction 2.3 Other elements of the auction product (e.g. MDQ, MHQ factor) Discussion deferred to next meeting. Day 2 6 Auction design 6.1 Primer on auction formats, pricing rules and auction algorithms Veronika Nemes provided a presentation covering the following topics: Market design and experiments Reverse game theory Why the “rules of the game” matter (rules, strategic behaviour, outcome) The process of market design. Experimental economics Smart markets (where constraints are embedded in the price determination – i.e. NEM vs. DWGM). Veronika that the challenge is to identify the rules that are required to achieve the objective knowing the likely strategic behaviour of the participants. Veronika also noted the importance of testing the auction design. Circulate slides presented by Veronika Nemes on auction design. 6.2 Identification of the auction designs for the auction and consideration of interrelationship with product design The team discussed the AEMC’s required, preferred and suggested recommendations in the East Coast Review final report. The team were also reminded that we are not starting with a blank sheet of paper, and that the AEMC did a lot of thinking on the auction design. Veronika and the team discussed: The price that shippers are likely to bid in the auction, with Veronika noting that the price parties will bid is likely to depend on their assessment of the probability of being the successful bidder (which will depend on who has nominated and been scheduled capacity), Timing of auction matters (if it is before or after as available capacity).
PARENTAL CONSENT FORM Parent’s or Guardian’s Consent. ONLY for those Under 18 years of age and must be completed before any tests, assessments and formal interviews take place. Please ask one of your parents or guardian to authorise the following statement: I declare that to the best of my knowledge the details given by my son, daughter or ward are correct. I have no objection to this application being forwarded for processing. If the application proceeds, I give consent for my son, daughter or ward to undergo physical and mental tests and assessments, interviews and medical examinations, which may involve time away from home in a Service establishment. I understand it is my responsibility to ensure that my son, daughter or ward conforms to government legalisation with regard to secondary education/training as per their associated part of the (More information regarding these requirements can be found at ). I understand that the Royal Air Force accepts no liability should my son, daughter or ward be unsuccessful in their application. My son, daughter or ward also understands and agrees to follow instructions given to them by Armed Forces Recruiting, Careers and Selection personnel. Please note: We shall ask for further written consent if your son, daughter or ward is still less than 18 years of age when they are to Enlist. Applicant’s Details Name Surname/Last Name/Family Name Parent’s or Guardian’s Details Signature Date dd/mm/yyyy Title First Name Surname/Last name/ Family name print Relationship Address Postcode Contact number Include code Email
Community Use of Schools Advisory Committee Date: Tuesday June 13, 2017 Time: 8:00 AM – 10:30 AM Location: Rooms 3 and 4 140 Borough Drive Committee Chairs: Trustee Chris Glover & Judy Gargaro DRAFT AGENDA - Revised ITEM LEAD TIME-LINE Status of Discussion 8:00 AM Welcome and Introductions Co-Chairs 5 minutes 8:05 AM Approval of Quorum Co-Chairs 5 minutes 8:10 AM Approval of Agenda Co-Chairs 5 minutes 8:15 AM Approval of Minutes- May 9, 2017 meeting Co-Chairs 5 minutes 8:20 AM Conflict of Interest Declaration Discussion 5 minutes 8:25 AM Delegations Name of Organization: Topic: Speaker: Co-Chairs 5 minutes and discussion 8:45 AM Permit Unit/Community Use of Schools Update P011, Community Use of Board Facilities Policy Review (Phase I) Illustration: City of Toronto vs. TDSB use of Any Changes to PSI Schools for 2017-2018 Survey: Cancellation Fees from other school boards Kitty Leung/ Ugonma Ekeanyanwu 60 minutes 9:45 AM Self-Evaluation and Annual Report Co-Chairs 10 minutes 9:55 AM Outstanding Action Items: CUSAC Advocacy Sub committee Pools Working Group update Fields Working Group update Equity Policy and our categories Heather Mitchell Trustee Glover 15 minutes 10:10 AM Trustee Report Trustee Glover 10 minutes 10:20 AM Meeting dates for 2017-18: 2nd Tuesday of the Month Co-Chairs 5 minutes 10:25 AM Other Business 5 minutes 10:30 AM Adjournment Next Meeting September 12, 2017 Co-Chairs
3) Written procedures listing the basic hygiene requirements should be made available. 4) Personnel must be protected from contact with irritants and potentially allergenic plant materials by means of adequate protective clothing. 4.4 Change control 1) In case any change will be made in the manufacturing procedure, etc. which could affect the quality of the products, the manufacturer shall have the person designated beforehand to conduct the following duties in accordance with the documented procedure: — to evaluate effects on the quality of the products due to such change; — to be approved by the manufacturing manager with respect to the change being made based on the results of the evaluation; — to establish and maintain records of the evaluation and approval. 2) The manufacturer shall conduct to revise relevant documents, to train the personnel and to take other necessary actions in case where any change is made upon approval of the manufacturing manager. 4.5 Deviation Control 1) In case any deviation from the manufacturing procedure, etc. has occurred, the manufacturer shall direct the person designated beforehand to evaluate effects on the quality of the products due to the deviation. 2) The manufacturing manager shall approve the designated person to take proper actions based on the results of the evaluation. 3) The manufacturer direct the designated person to establish and to maintain records of the evaluation. 4) The manufacturer shall conduct to revise relevant documents, to train the personnel and to take other necessary actions. 4.6 Self-inspections The manufacturer, etc. shall have the person designated beforehand to conduct the following duties: — to conduct the self-inspections periodically on the manufacturing control and quality control of the products in their manufacturing site, and to establish and maintain records of it; — to report in writing the results of the self-inspections to the manufacturing manager; — to take necessary actions in case where improvements are necessary for correcting, and to establish and maintain records of such actions.
consider how and when System Use Gas is scheduled too. The team came to a high level view on allocation agreements, as detailed in the right hand column. In forming this view, the team considered: Whether shippers could be deemed to be a party to allocation agreements in the OTA. There were concerns this may be open to dispute. Pipeline operators may also have to seek at each point to allow deeming, and this could be complex for some. Whether all allocation agreements could be included as schedules in the OTA. The team considered this was likely to also be complex and time consuming to set up, and may not be possible. Pipeline operators are not currently typically privy to agreements where they are not the allocation agent, and there could be confidentiality issues to add all these to the OTA. Further complexity could also be introduced if an allocation agreement is to be changed in the future if all shippers on the pipeline are automatically a party on every allocation agreement. Similarly, if shippers are party to all allocation agreements, there may be unnecessary reporting introduced. Regardless of the allocation agreement arrangement, shippers will be required to be set up in the pipeline operator systems at the relevant points prior to trading, and secondary shippers will have to pipeline by pipeline to allow each pipeline operator to assess the credit worthiness of the counterparties. This will depend on the platform and auction design. Any reference to ‘penalty’ to be replaced with ‘charge’ in relation to imbalance and overrun. The team agreed for allocations: The allocation procedures terms in the OTA could reflect APA’s general term – ‘as per multi-shipper agreement or pro-rated by nomination’ as a starting point. There is to be transparency requirements for specifying who to contact and where shippers should go to sign up to an allocation agreement.
Table 5: Internal control quality and R&D intensity (OLS) variable RDIINC Coef. t P>t _cons 0.0452047 0.96 0.337 INCONTROL 0.0000348* 1.70 0.089 UNIFY 0.0018051 0.79 0.428 EDU 0.0071512*** 6.23 0.000 COMPENSA 0.0030871** 2.10 0.036 CEOAGE -0.0001357 -0.82 0.410 CEOGEND -0.0058261 -1.47 0.141 MARKETTYPE 0.0082872** 2.47 0.014 LISTAGE 0.0000334 0.05 0.963 INDEPENCEI 0.0296503 1.39 0.164 STATEDU 0.0058245** 2.05 0.040 OWNOER -0.0376895*** -3.75 0.000 ROA 0.0372932 1.19 0.233 ASSET -0.0048796*** -2.76 0.006 LEV -0.0465144*** -5.75 0.000 TURNOVER -0.0217047*** -7.34 0.000 CASHI -0.0142147 -0.90 0.368 ENVIRN 0.0172085* 1.85 0.064 Control YEAR Control F value (Prob > F) 23.20(0.0000) Adj R-squared 0.2860 Obs 1276 ***, **, represent 1%、5%, and 10% significance levels
Table 6: Internal control quality and R&D intensity (Tobit) variable RDIINC Coef. t P>t _cons 0.0399740 0.85 0.398 INCONTROL 0.0000350* 1.70 0.089 UNIFY 0.0018253 0.80 0.425 EDU 0.0070268*** 6.10 0.000 COMPENSA 0.0030850** 2.08 0.037 CEOAGE -0.0001306 -0.79 0.430 CEOGEND -0.0063855 -1.61 0.109 MARKETTYPE 0.0086377*** 2.56 0.010 LISTAGE 0.0001267 0.17 0.863 INDEPENCEI 0.0251620 1.17 0.241 STATEDU 0.0055168* 1.93 0.054 OWNOER -0.0394049*** -3.89 0.000 ROA 0.0457756 1.46 0.145 -0.0049908*** -2.81 0.005 LEV -0.0462157*** -5.68 0.000 TURNOVER -0.0227027*** -7.57 0.000 -0.0166886 -1.05 0.294 ENVIRN 0.0202977** 2.17 0.030 INDUS Control YEAR Control Log likelihood 2393.3415 LR chi2 459.22 Prob > chi2 0.0000 Obs 1276 ***, **, * represent 1%、5%, and 10% significance levels
variable RDIINC Coef. t P>t _cons 0.0401939 0.85 0.395 INCONTROL 0.0000693** 2.11 0.035 UNIFY 0.0017548 0.77 0.441 EDU 0.0072378*** 6.29 0.000 COMPENSA 0.0030522** 2.07 0.038 CEOAGE -0.0001304 -0.79 0.429 CEOGEND -0.0060054 -1.51 0.130 MARKETTYPE 0.0083890** 2.50 0.013 LISTAGE -0.0000242 -0.03 0.974 INDEPENCEI 0.0278513 1.30 0.193 STATEDU 0.0059721** 2.10 0.036 OWNOER -0.0377311*** -3.75 0.000 ROA 0.0168257 0.48 0.629 ASSET -0.0055756*** -3.02 0.003 LEV -0.0460134*** -5.67 0.000 TURNOVER -0.0216535*** -7.31 0.000 CASHI -0.0121537 -0.77 0.444 ENVIRN 0.0171653* 1.84 0.065 INDUS Control YEAR Control F value (Prob > F) 23.22(0.0000) Adj R-squared 0.2843 Obs 1276 ***, **, * represent 1%、5%, and 10% significance levels 11 Results of Difference in Difference test (OLS) variable RDIINC RDIINC
DID Reference Purpose Provides data for BCWP (To Date). Fields Name Use Notes ControlAccountID Provide the ID of the associated control account. This is only used if the metric is reported at the control account level; otherwise, the field must be null. WorkPackageID Provide the ID of the associated work package. This field is only used if the metric is reported at the work package level; otherwise, the field must be null. ElementOfCostID Provide the ID of the associated element of cost. This field is only used if the metric is reported by element of cost; otherwise, the field must be null. ReportingPeriodID Provide the ID of the associated reporting period. This field is only used if the metric is non-cumulative; otherwise, the field must be null. Value_Dollars Provide a dollar value for the metric. Value_Hours Provide an hour value for the metric. Use Notes Reported values must be additive across each of the dimensions reported. In particular, values reported by element of cost must sum to values that aggregate all elements of cost, and time-phased values must sum to values that are cumulative to date. Values that are not time-phased must be cumulative to date with respect to the current reporting period, as defined in the metadata. Records only reporting zero values should be omitted. ACWP_ToDate Table ACWP_ToDate Entity ACWP_ToDate DID Reference Purpose Provides data for ACWP (To Date). Fields Name Use Notes ControlAccountID Provide the ID of the associated control account. This field is only used if the metric is reported at the control account level; otherwise, the field must be null. WorkPackageID Provide the ID of the associated work package. This field is only used if the metric is reported at the work package level; otherwise, the field must be null. ElementOfCostID Provide the ID of the associated element of cost. This field is only used if the metric is reported by element of cost; otherwise, the field must be null. ReportingPeriodID Provide the ID of the associated reporting period. This is only used if the metric is non-cumulative; otherwise, the field must be null. Value_Dollars Provide a dollar value for the metric.
Working knowledge of Health and Safety at Work requirements Have or be willing to work towards a Level 3 Diploma in Health & Social Care (or equivalent suitable qualification) Working knowledge of Care Quality Commission requirement IOSH Supervising Safely or prepared to work towards Aid at Work or prepared to work towards To hold or to complete a Care Certificate within 12 weeks of commencing employment’ Awareness of the work of the RAF Association Clean driving licence & willing to drive RAFA vehicles Working knowledge of effects of medication and of age related medical conditions Communication and Relationships Ability to communicate clearly and sensitively with guests, staff and visitors Experience in writing clear and concise records and reports Ability to give advice & instruction in emergency situations Ability to provide information to inspectors and visitors People Management Experience of supporting and directing others in their work Proven ability too give clear instruction to others Ability to provide in house training sessions Experience of undertaking supervision & appraisals Decision Making and Problem Solving Be resourceful, innovative and self motivated To prioritise own workload and that of other staff Ability to be decisive in cases of emergency Ability to solve care related problems and know when to seek advice Ability to respond flexibly and creatively to unexpected situations Financial & Physical Resources Responsibility To be able to identify, report and arrange repair of defects of equipment To be able use permanent and temporary staff in a cost effective way Experience of cost effective staff rota management Experience of handling cash Responsibility for Information Working knowledge of maintaining confidentiality of information Experienced in accessing computer data bases
Knowledge and Experience A practical understanding of marketing and experience of developing and managing plans in pursuit of marketing objectives Experience of creating and implementing marketing strategy and campaign plans Significant experience of ensuring cohesion across a range of material Knowledge of different marketing channels, the best practices of using them and the merits and drawbacks of each Experience of providing support to a diverse range of stakeholder groups Demonstrable experience of brand management and development processes Sound understanding of marketing principles and practice Knowledge and understanding of the role of the marketing function to deliver business objectives Excellent knowledge of the marketing landscape Knowledge of the Royal Air Force, its structure and its history Awareness of the work of the Association Experience working with a membership organisation Skills, Abilities and Personal Attributes Able to effectively communicate information and ideas verbally Proven ability to work effectively across organisations and to form positive relationships quickly, as well as to report efficiently and effectively to a project steering group Strong written communication skills – excellent spelling and grammar A strategic thinker – able to analyse qualitative and quantitative data identifying the most important issues and implications. Excellent presentation skills Strong eye for detail, design and layout
BUILDING / DEMOLITION APPLICATIONS FEE SCHEDULE Current as at 1 July 2017 Classification Building Permit Fee Building Construction & Training Industry Levy Building Service Levy CERTIFIED APPLICATION 1 & 10 0.19% of the estimated of the building Work as determined by the relevant permit authority, but not less than $97.70 0.2% of the estimated value of work over $20,000 $45,000 or less a fee of $61.65 Over $45,000 0.137% of work value CERTIFIED APPLICATION CLASS 2 TO CLASS 9 0.09% of the estimated value of the building Work as determined by the relevant permit authority, but not less than $97.70 0.2% of the estimated of work over $20,000 $45,000 or less a fee of $61.65 Over $45,000 0.137% of work value UNCERTIFIED APPLICATION CLASS 1 & 10 0.32% of the estimated value of the building Work as determined by the relevant permit authority, but not less than $97.70 0.2% of the estimated value of work over $20,000 $45,000 or less a fee of $61.65 Over $45,000 0.137% of work value DEMOLITION PERMIT For demolition work in respect of a Class 1 or Class 10 building or incidental structure - $97.70 $45,000 or less a fee of $61.65 For demolition work in respect of a Class 2 to Class 9 building Over $45,000 0.137% of work value OCCUPANCY PERMIT OR BUILDING APPROVAL CERTIFICATE under ss47, 49, 50 or 52 of the Building Act 2011 Application for an occupancy Permit for a completed building (s.46) - $97.70 $61.65 OCCUPANCY PERMIT OR BUILDING APPROVAL CERTIFICATE for unauthorised work under s51 of the Building Act 2011 Application for an occupancy permit for a building in respect where unauthorised work has be done (s.51(2)) - $97.70 Application for a building approval certificate in respect of which unauthorised work has been done (s.51(3)) – $97.70 $45,000 or Less $123.30 Over $45,000 0.274% of work value
Australia’s Top 20 Selling Vehicles June 2017 Listed below are Australia’s top 20 selling light vehicles to the end of June 2017, with their corresponding CO2 range. Rankings are based on VFACTS year to date sales data and their CO2 range is based on the combined cycle tailpipe data for all current models. Rank Make Model Range (g/km) 1 Ford Ranger 4x4 182 - 256 2 Toyota Hilux 4x4 191 - 277 3 Toyota Corolla 96 - 162 4 Hyundai Tucson 178 - 190 5 Mazda 3 129 - 153 6 Hyundai i30 125 - 179 7 Toyota 121 - 183 8 Mitsubishi Triton 4x4 188 - 201 9 Mazda CX-5 148 - 172 10 Toyota RAV4 149 - 198 11 Kia Cerato 168 (all variants) 12 Mitsubishi Outlander 41 - 166 13 Mitsubishi ASX 160 - 181 14 Volkswagen Golf 124 - 170 15 Holden Colorado 4x4 210 - 241 16 Nissan X-Trail 139 - 192 17 Holden Commodore 198 - 304 18 Mazda CX-3 125 - 160 19 Toyota Prado 208 - 266 20 Nissan Navara 4x4 172-187 Note: The CO2 range for the top selling 20 models listed above is based on the best and worst performing variant of the listed model. Variants with different engines, transmissions and fuel types may have different CO2 emissions within this range.
SOCIAL MEDIA –David Fitzjarrell David had a conflict and could not attend the meeting this month. Transition continues for David, who will work with Apurva. Kellyn noted that postings were made out to social media for call for papers for Training Days 2018, as well as the August 4th meeting. An e-mail will also go out from Linda’s team as well. NEWSLETTER – Rene Antunez Communication will go out to ask for authors. The feeling is some may be Non-Oracle. Kellyn brought up that the DBA is asked to broaden horizons, and this is welcome. Rene brought up Board Focus articles for Board Members to explain more about themselves. Apurva, Bill and Bryan were brought up as potential candidates, being newer members. Tim also brought up an example of a member focus articles from a member, talking about the focus articles don’t necessarily need to be strictly about one’s profession, but can contain personal endeavors, where applicable. Kellyn will do a President’s Letter and give to Rene as well. Peggy asked about deadlines for this, and Rene responded that August 2nd is the deadline. That said, Peggy suggested pushing out the date a bit and try to get Rich to do a quick write-up on the August meeting. Rene is still investigating the move from a hard copy version of the newsletter to an online copy. SCHOLARSHIP DIRECTOR – Nicole Navratil David, Tim, and Nicole reviewed candidates and made decision to give $500 scholarships to two of the candidates. Nicole Navratil: Motioned to award $500 scholarships to David and Ben. Tim Gorman: Seconded this motion Motion Carries: Unanimous approval by the Directors entitled to vote
This application should be signed by those persons who are empowered to give assurances and commitments on behalf of the organisation. In signing this endorsement, you are affirming that this application has the full consent and support of your organisation’s Board of Directors, or other equivalent relevant authority. Name Signature Position held in the organisation Date Aged Care Service Information Please provide the following information for each aged care service requiring assistance. Name of Service Location / Address Contact Name and Position Email Address Telephone Number Alternative Contact Name and Position Email Address Telephone Number Aged Care Service Places Service Name Home Care Packages Commonwealth Home Support Programme Residential Care National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Flexible Aged Care Program Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 No. of Clients No. of Residents No. of Clients Please provide the following information for each aged care service included above.
Wet heat Electricity Chemicals 6 Know how to provide first aid to a casualty with an eye injury 6.1 Identify how to administer first aid for eye injuries involving: Dust Chemicals Embedded objects 7 Know how to provide aid to a casualty with sudden poisoning 7.1 Identify the routes that poisons can take to the body 7.2 Identify how to administer first aid to a casualty affected by sudden poisoning 7.3 Identify sources of information for treating those affected by sudden poisoning 8 Know how to provide first aid to a casualty with anaphylaxis 8.1 Identify common triggers for anaphylaxis 8.2 Recognise suspected anaphylaxis 8.3 Identify how to administer first aid for a casualty suffering from anaphylaxis 9 Know how to provide first aid to a casualty with suspected major illness 9.1 Recognise suspected: Attack Stroke Epileptic seizure Asthma attack 9.2 Identify how to administer first aid to a casualty suffering from: Heart Attack Stroke Epileptic seizure Diabetic emergency Additional information about the unit Unit purpose and aims Purpose of the unit is for the learner to attain knowledge and practical competences required to deal with a range of workplace first aid situations Details of the relationship between the unit and relevant NOS or other professional standards or curricula (if appropriate) First Aid at Work Health and Safety (First Aid) Regulations 1981 Guidance on Regulations (L74) Resuscitation Council (UK) Guidelines Aid at Work Health and Safety (First Aid) Regulations 1982 (Northern Ireland)
Committee on Transport and Tourism Public Hearing “Impact of Brexit on Aviation” PROGRAMME Brussels, 11 July 2017 15h00-17h30 Room PHS 3C50 15h00 Opening by Karima DELLI, Chair of the TRAN Committee 15h05 - 15h25 Brexit in aviation: Perspective of the Airports John Holland-Kaye – CEO, Heathrow Airport, ACI Europe Kevin Toland – CEO – Dublin Airport, ACI Europe Franck Goldnadel – Executive and managing director, Chief Airport Operations, de Gaulle Airport 15h25 - 16h05 - Brexit in aviation: Perspective of the Airlines and Tourism Industry Willie Walsh – CEO, IAG Michael O'Leary – CEO, Ryanair Sean Kennedy – Senior Vice President, Global Government Affairs, Airlines for America Thomas Kropp – Senior Vice President Government Affairs and International Relations Lufthansa Group Ralf Pastleitner – Director International Public Policy, Group Corporate & External Affairs – TUI Group 16h05 - 16h10 – Brexit in aviation - comments by Airbus Nathalie Errard – Senior Vice President, EU and Nato affairs, Airbus 16h10 Questions and answers 17h25 Concluding remarks by the Chair, Karima DELLI 17h30 End of programme
Northamptonshire 2nd XI (2nd Innings) Batsman Runs Balls Mins 4s 6s Dots S/r HRD Adair st Hodd b Shutt 80 156 198 11 1 123 51.28 CO Thurston c Thompson b Rhodes 48 58 79 7 0 37 82.76 CF Hughes c Lees b Barnes 22 38 39 4 0 31 57.89 SA Zaib lbw b Fisher 8 12 18 1 0 9 66.67 HRC Elllison c Callis b Wainman 6 31 43 1 0 29 19.35 A Kapil c Thompson b Wainman 66 80 107 9 2 54 82.50 SA Sharif c Lees b Fisher 28 58 74 3 1 46 48.28 TB Sole* not out 37 61 71 7 0 46 60.66 AEK King+ b Fisher 2 5 2 0 0 4 40.00 CPW Haddow c Hodd b Fisher 0 4 7 0 0 4 0.00 M Bilal not out 1 25 44 0 0 24 4.00 Extras 9b 2lb 0w 12nb 0pen 23 Provisional Score For Innings 321 Penalties awarded following Innings 0 Total 321 for 9 Bowler O M R W Wd Nb Dots S/r Econ JA Brooks 18.0 4 63 0 0 (0) 4 (8) 89 0.00 3.50 MD Fisher 19.0 5 43 4 0 (0) 0 (0) 89 28.50 2.26 JC Wainman 23.0 5 90 2 0 (0) 1 (2) 104 69.50 3.91 K Carver 10.0 2 39 0 0 (0) 0 (0) 44 0.00 3.90 WMH Rhodes 3.0 0 16 1 0 (0) 1 (2) 14 19.00 5.33 E Barnes 7.0 0 30 1 0 (0) 0 (0) 29 42.00 4.29 JW Shutt 7.0 1 29 1 0 (0) 0 (0) 32 42.00 4.14 Batsman Fall of Wicket Partnership Batsmen Over CO Thurston 1-81 81 CO Thurston (48) HRD Adair (26) 18.4 CF Hughes 2-112 31 CF Hughes (22) HRD (9) 29.4
SA Zaib 3-131 19 SA Zaib (8) HRD Adair (11) 34.2 HRC Elllison 4-162 31 HRC Elllison (6) HRD Adair (25) 45.2 HRD Adair 5-172 10 HRD Adair (9) A Kapil (1) 50.2 SA Sharif 6-264 92 SA Sharif (28) A Kapil (64) 70.2 A Kapil 7-278 14 A Kapil (1) TB Sole (12) 73.6 AEK King 8-280 2 AEK King (2) TB Sole (0) 74.5 CPW Haddow 9-288 8 CPW Haddow (0) TB Sole (7) 76.3 The last pair survived 10.3 overs Over rate is level par; Points – Yorks 9; Northants 7
is required to co-operate in order to the obtaining the grace of Justification, and that it is not in any way necessary, that he be prepared and disposed by the movement of his own will; let him be anathema." Anathema means cursed or damned. Roman Catholics pronounce a curse on those who claim that we can be justified by faith alone WITHOUT the sacraments. Roman Catholics believe that justification is a process instead of just being an event. Catholics see justification and sanctification as two different ways of describing the same reality; whereas for Protestants they are inseparable, yet still distinguishable from one another. For Catholics merit still plays a role in their salvation – merit which is dispensed through the 7 sacraments of the Catholic Church – even though Catholics do acknowledge that this merit comes from the grace of God.