zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Introduction and Welcome Chair 18:00 Apologies for Absence and quoracy check Chair 18:00 External Audit report CG 21/18 External Auditors 18:05 Quality Report Assurance CG 22/18 External Auditors 18:15 STAFF, PATIENT EXPERIENCE AND TRANSFORMATIONAL CHANGE PRESENTATIONS Article 12 Presentation Presentation Patient Experience and Involvement Manager 18:25 INTRODUCTORY ITEMS Minutes of Last Meeting on 13 June 2018 and Matters Arising CG 23/18 Chair 18:40 Declarations of Interest Declaration Chair 18:50 Update Report from Chair Oral Update Chair 18:55 Update Report from NED Oral Update Jonathan Asbridge 19:05 Update Report on Key Issues from Chief Executive CG 24/18 Chief Executive 19:15 QUALITY, PERFORMANCE AND GOVERNANCE Quarterly Finance Report CG 25/18 Director of Finance 19:45 Quarterly Performance Report CG 26/18 Director of Performance 19:50 Quarterly Workforce Report CG 27/18 oral update Director of HR 19:55 Annual Report including Annual Accounts and Quality Account online access: Director of Corporate Affairs & Company Secretary Director of Finance Director of Nursing & Clinical Standards 20:00 Fit and Proper Person Checks CG 29/18 Director of Corporate Affairs & Company Secretary 20:10 Register of Interests CG 30/18 Director of Corporate Affairs & Company Secretary 20:20
Lawrie Stratford 31/06/20 Astrid Schloerscheidt 31/05/20 Andrea McCubbin 31/12/21 Davina Logan 01/05/19 Sula Wiltshire 31/12/20 Lin Hazel 31/07/20 Debbie Richards 01/09/20 Tina Kenny 31/10/20 Martin Howell 31/03/2019 (3rd) Sir Jonathan Asbridge 30/06/2020 (2nd) Sir John Allison 31/03/2021 (2nd) Alyson Coates 31/03/2020 (3rd) Professor Sue Dopson 31/05/2021 (3rd) Bernard Galton 31/01/2021 (1st) Hurst 31/03/2020 (1st) Dr Aroop Mozumder 31/01/2021 (1st) Lucy Weston (associate) 31/08/2020 (1st)
No. Item Report Led by Approx Time Introduction and Welcome Chair 18:00 Apologies for Absence and quoracy check Chair 18:00 Mindfulness Report Oral update Reinhard Kowalski Jo-Ann Pereira 18:00 STAFF, PATIENT EXPERIENCE AND TRANSFORMATIONAL CHANGE PRESENTATIONS Patient Experience & Involvement Report CG 34/17 Patient Experience and Involvement Manager Head of Quality Governance 18:20 INTRODUCTORY ITEMS Minutes of Last Meeting on 13 September 2017 and Matters Arising CG 35/17 Chair 18:35 Declarations of Interest Declaration Chair 18:40 Update Report from Chair Oral Update Chair 18:45 Update Report from Director Oral Update Bernard Galton 18:55 Update Report on Key Issues from Chief Executive CG 36/17 Chief Executive 19:05 QUALITY, PERFORMANCE AND GOVERNANCE Finance Report CG 37/17 Director of Finance 19:35 Performance Report CG 38/17 Interim Director of Performance 19:45 Workforce / Recruitment and Retention Report Oral Update Director of HR 19:55 Update on the Out of Hours Service Oral Update Chief Operating Officer 20:05 Update on the new School of Nursing and Midwifery CG 39/17 Director of Nursing & Clinical Standards 20:15 Governor Questions: i) Staff survey themes ii) Serious incident themes Oral update HR Director Director of Nursing 20:25
Patient Experience Group: iii) Bicester experience Medical Director Update Report from Council Sub-groups and Governor Forum: Nominations & Remuneration Finance Quality & Safety Patient Experience Working Together Governor Forum Membership Involvement CG 40/17 Various (Led by Chairs) 20:35 FORWARD PLANNING Questions from the public Chair 20:45 Any other business Chair 20:45 Close of meeting Chair 20:45 Council of Governors Member attendance 2017-18 Name June 2017 Sept 2017 Nov 2017 March 2018 Adeel Arif Alan Jones Andy Harman Caroline Birch Chris Mace Chris Roberts Dave Pugh David Mant Davina Logan Geoffrey Forster Gill Randall Gillian Karen Holmes Kelly Bark Reinhard Kowalski Madeleine Radburn Martin Dominguez Mike Appleyard
No. Item Report Led by Approx Time Introduction and Welcome Chair 18:00 Apologies for Absence and quoracy check Chair 18:00 STAFF, PATIENT EXPERIENCE AND TRANSFORMATIONAL CHANGE PRESENTATIONS Patient Experience Presentation Presentation Patient Experience and Involvement Manager 18:10 INTRODUCTORY ITEMS Minutes of Last Meeting on 15 November 2017 and Matters Arising CG 03/18 Chair 18:25 Declarations of Interest Declaration Chair 18:30 Update Report from Chair Oral Update Chair 18:35 Update Report from Director Oral Update Sue Dopson 18:45 Update Report on Key Issues from Executive CG 04/18 Chief Executive 18:55 QUALITY, PERFORMANCE AND GOVERNANCE Finance Report CG 05/18 Director of Finance 19:25 Performance Report CG 06/18 Interim Director of Performance 19:35 Workforce / Recruitment and Retention Report Oral Update Director of HR 19:45 Update on the Directorate Restructure CG 07/18 Chief Operating Officer 19:55 Out of GP CQC Inspection Action Plan CG 08/18 Director of Nursing & Clinical Standards 20:05 Governor Election Strategy CG 09/18 Assistant Trust Secretary 20:15 Lead and Deputy Lead Governor Elections CG 10/18 Assistant Trust Secretary 20:25 Appointment of a Successor Chairman CG 11/18 Assistant Trust Secretary 20:35 Governor Questions: i) Staff survey themes ii) Serious incident themes Oral update HR Director Director of Nursing 20:45
Council of Governors 7th June 2017 Agenda No. Item Report Led by Approx Time Introduction and Welcome 18:00 Apologies for Absence and quoracy check Chair 18:00 STAFF, PATIENT EXPERIENCE AND TRANSFORMATIONAL CHANGE PRESENTATIONS Patient Experience Presentation Oral Presentation Patient Experience and Involvement Manager 18:00 INTRODUCTORY ITEMS Minutes of Last Meeting on 08 March 2017 and Matters Arising CG 12/17 Chair 18:15 Declarations of Interest Declaration Chair 18:20 Register of Interests CG 13/17 Chair Update Report from Chair New Governors Deputy Lead Governor Oral Update Chair 18:25 Update Report on Key Issues from Chief Executive CG 14/17 Executive 18:35 Update Report from NED Oral Update Anne Grocock 19:05 QUALITY, PERFORMANCE AND GOVERNANCE Cyber Security Update* Oral Update Information Officer 19:15 Update on Trust Financial Position / Finance Report CG 15/17 Director of Finance 19:25 Workforce Performance Report CG 16/17 Director of Finance Equality and Diversity Report CG 17/17 Director of Finance
Performance Report CG 18/17 Director of Finance Procurement of External Audit Services CG 19/17 Director of Finance 19:30 Car Parking Update Oral Update Chief Operating Officer 19:40 Governor Queries* Change management e.g. MSK, Psychological Therapies CBT waiting times Oral Update Chief Operating Officer 19:50 Nursing Recruitment/ Retention Report Oral Update Director of Nursing and Clinical Standards 20:00 Care Quality Commission Out of Hours Inspection Report CG 21/17 Director of Nursing and Clinical Standards 20:10 NHS Improvement Self Assessment CG 22/17 Director of Corporate Affairs & Company Secretary 20:20 Governor Matters1 Membership* Oral Update Director of Corporate Affairs & Company Secretary 20:25 Non-Executive Directors New appointments CG 23/17 Chairman / Company Secretary 20:30 Update Report from Council Sub-groups and Governor Forum: Nominations & Remuneration Finance Quality & Safety Patient Experience Working Together Governor Forum CG 24/17 Various (Led by Chairs) 20:35 FORWARD PLANNING Questions from the public Chair 20:40 Any business 20:40 of meeting Chair 20:45 Council of Governors - member attendance 2017
Secondary (Tier 2) Intervention Grid: Elementary Students Support Description School-wide Data: Entry Criteria Data to Monitor Progress Exit Criteria Direct Behavior Rating (DBR) DBR completed daily by teacher or other school staff (e.g., reading specialist, social worker) during daily observation periods (e.g., core instruction during English language arts). The completed DBR is shared with parents who are asked to sign the form each day. DBR will be used to monitor academic engagement, respect, and disruption. At the conclusion of each observation period, the teacher uses the provided scale to indicate the degree to which the student displayed each behavior. The teacher meets briefly with the student to share the teacher’s DBR rating. Home-school communication procedures are established (e.g., student takes a paper copy or email to parent or caregiver each day). The DBR is then signed and returned to the teacher, or parent/caregiver replies to the email. Behavior SRSS-E7 score: Moderate (4-8) and/or SRSS-I5 score: Moderate (2-3) AND Evidence of teacher implementation of Ci3T primary (Tier 1) plan [treatment integrity: direct observation] AND Parent permission Student measures Direct Behavior Rating (DBR; daily) Attendance and tardies Social validity Teacher: IRP-15 Student: CIRP Treatment integrity DBR treatment integrity measure Student goals met for 10 – 12 weeks (team review of progress to determine) SRSS-E7 and I5 scores are in the low risk category
To neighbouring countries of the country of origin (or country of habitual residence) specified in the travel document issued to refugees in your (Member) State? YES/NO If yes, please elaborate on the rationale behind the limitation to travel to neighbouring countries: Q11. If refugees travel to their country of origin: Do they need to notify in advance national authorities of the State of protection? YES/NO If yes, please specify (i) procedures and (ii) national authority they should notify. Please also elaborate (iii) on the consequences of non-notification. Do they need to request a specific permission or authorisation to do so to a designated national authority in the State that granted protection? YES/NO If yes, please answer by indicating (i) what procedures and authorities are involved, and (ii) on what grounds they can request such authorisation. Q12. Can refugees request their original passport from authorities of the State that granted protection? YES/NO If yes, please elaborate on (i) procedures and (ii) circumstances in which such requests are possible: Q13. What are the most common reasons for travel to their country of origin stated by refugees to authorities in your (Member) State? Visits for family reasons (please specify) Marriage in the country of origin Business reasons Other reasons (please specify) Q13a. Please specify if this information is recorded by national authorities (e.g. in a database). Q14. If a refugee travelled to his/her country of origin, can this possibly lead to the cessation of his/her refugee status? YES/NO If no, please go directly to Section 2.3. If yes, please elaborate (e.g. this can be considered as re-establishment in the country of origin, etc): Q14a. If a refugee travelled to his/her country of origin, can this have other consequences on his/her refugee status? YES/NO If yes, please elaborate (e.g. this can trigger a (re)assessment of the initial application for refugee protection): Q15. If travelling to the country of origin may lead to cessation of protection (see question 14), is it specified: In national legislation? If box is marked, please specify legislation: In case law? If box is marked, please indicate case law reference and summary: In practice? If box is marked, please explain practice:
The Application Form identifies one or more test/ demonstration/ deployment site locations. All test/ demonstration/ deployment sites are located in a California electric IOU service territories (PG&E, SDG&E, or SCE). (project does not involve testing/ demonstration/ deployment activities) The application does not contain any confidential information or identify any portion of the application as confidential. Pass Fail The applicant has not included a statement or otherwise indicated that it will not accept the terms and conditions, or that acceptance is based on modifications to the terms and conditions. Pass Fail For funding: The proposal includes one or more support letters, a match funding commitment letter, and/or a demonstration/ deployment commitment letter, as specified in Attachment 11. If the proposal includes commitment letters that are not required and do not meet the requirements of Attachment 11, the letters will not be considered in the scoring Pass Fail Proposals that pass ALL One Screening Criteria will be evaluated based on the Scoring Criteria on the next page and the Scoring Scale below (with the exception of criteria 6−8, which will be evaluated as described in each criterion). Each criterion has an assigned number of possible points, and is divided into multiple sub-criteria. The sub-criteria are not equally weighted. The Project Narrative (Attachment 4) must respond to each sub-criterion, unless otherwise indicated. The total minimum passing score is 70.00 out of 100 points. The minimum passing for criteria 1−4 is 49.00 points. The points for criteria 5−8 will only be applied to proposals that achieve the minimum score for criteria 1−4. Scoring Scale % of Possible Points Interpretation Explanation for Percentage Points 0% Not Responsive The response fails to address the criteria. The omissions, flaws, or defects are significant and unacceptable. 10-30% Minimally Responsive The response minimally addresses the criteria. The omissions, flaws, or defects are significant and unacceptable. 40-60% Inadequate The response addresses the criteria.
6a (Phase 2 ONLY) Scope of Work Template: Project Schedule (Excel spreadsheet) 7 (Phase 2 ONLY) Budget Forms (Excel spreadsheet) 8 1 - Optional) 2 – Required) CEQA Compliance Form 9 (Phase 2 ONLY) Reference and Work Product Form 10 (Phase 2 ONLY) Contact List Template 11 (Phase 1, As Required) (Phase 2, As Required) Intent, Commitment and Support Letter Form (letters require signature) 12 (Phase 2 ONLY) Or 12a and 12b* Instructions for Cost Benefit Calculations Or Instructions for Benefits Calculations – PUBLIC and Instructions for Cost Calculations – CONFIDENTIAL Groups 2 and 3 Only - CPUC LCOE worksheets or 13 2 ONLY) Performance Data – Groups 2 and 3 Only *Submitting information confidentially is optional and applicants may use the original Attachment 12 if they prefer not to submit confidential information. For applicants who want to protect cost information, Attachment 12 information may be submitted using Attachments 12a Instructions for Benefits Calculations - PUBLIC and 12b Instructions for Cost Calculations – CONFIDENTIAL instead of the original Attachment 12. Confidential information submitted under Attachment 12b will remain confidential for 3 years.
who seek the return of any materials must make this request to the CAO listed in Part I, and provide sufficient postage to fund the cost of returning the materials. Screening Criteria The Application must pass ALL criteria to progress to Stage Two. Pass/Fail The application is received by the Energy Commission’s Contracts, Grants and Loans Office by the due date and time specified in the “Key Activities Schedule” in Section I of this solicitation. Pass Fail The Application Form (Attachment 1) is signed where indicated. Pass Fail The application addresses only one of the eligible project groups, as indicated on the Application Form. Pass Fail The requested funding falls within the minimum and maximum range specified in Part I of this solicitation. Pass Fail The Application Form and budget specify that the applicant will provide at least 25% of EPIC funds in match funds. Pass Fail The application does not contain any confidential information or identify any portion of the application as confidential. Pass Fail The applicant has not included a statement or otherwise indicated that it will not accept the terms and conditions, or that acceptance is based on modifications to the terms and conditions. Pass Fail Complies with all eligibility criteria in Section II. Pass Fail If the applicant has submitted more than one application for the same project group, each application is for a distinct project (i.e., no overlap with respect to the tasks described in the Scope of Work, Attachment 6). If the projects are not distinct and the applications were submitted at the same time, only the first application screened by the Energy Commission will be eligible for funding. If the applications were submitted separately, only the first application received by the Energy Commission will be eligible for funding. Pass Fail Demonstration Activities: The Application Form identifies one or more test/ demonstration/ deployment site locations. Pass Fail
Group 2: Pilot Demonstration of Advanced Solar + Storage Technologies for Applications $3,500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 Group 3: Enhanced Modeling Tools to Maximize Solar + Storage Benefits $1,000,000 $1,000,000 4: Advanced Smart Inverter Capabilities to Support Solar $6,000,000 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 Group 5: Holistic Forecasting to Support Solar Grid Operations $1,500,000 $500,000 $750,000 Group 6: Energy Storage Deployment to Facilitate Storage Interconnection and Enable Integration of Distributed Solar $8,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 20% of requested project funds Funding Requirement For applicants to 6, match funding is required in the amount of at least 20% of the requested project funds. Group 6 applicants that provide more than this amount will receive additional points during the scoring phase (See Part IV).
Impacts and Benefits for California IOU Ratepayers Explains how the proposed project will benefit California Investor-Owned Utility (IOU) ratepayers with respect to the EPIC goals of greater reliability, lower costs, and/or increased safety). Provides plausible, and justifiable quantitative estimates of potential benefits for California IOU electricity ratepayers, including the following (as applicable): annual electricity and thermal savings (kilowatt-hour and therms), peak load reduction and/or shifting, energy cost reductions, greenhouse gas emission reductions, air emission reductions (e.g., NOx), and water use and/or cost reductions. States the timeframe, assumptions, and calculations for the estimated benefits, and explains their reasonableness. Identifies impacted market segments in California, including size and penetration or deployment with underlying assumptions. Discusses any qualitative or intangible benefits to California IOU electricity ratepayers, including timeframe and assumptions. Provides a cost-benefit analysis that compares project costs to anticipated benefits. Explains how costs and benefits will be calculated and quantified, and identifies any underlying assumptions. For Project Group 2 only: Describes any co-benefit metrics recommended by CBO or community partners. 20 Team Qualifications, Capabilities, and Resources Describes the organizational structure of the applicant and the project team. Includes an organizational chart that illustrates the structure. Identifies key team members, including the project manager and principal investigator (include this information in Attachment 5, Project Team Form). Summarizes the qualifications, experience, capabilities, and credentials of the key team members (include this information in Attachment 5, Project Team Form). Explains how the various tasks will be managed and coordinated, and how the project manager’s technical expertise will support the effective management and coordination of all projects in the application. Describes the facilities, infrastructure, and resources available to the team. Describes the team’s history of successfully completing projects (e.g., RD&D projects) and commercializing and/or deploying results/products. Identifies past projects that resulted in a market-ready technology (include this information in Attachment 9, Reference and Work Product Form). 10
California.” However, funds spent by workers in California (e.g., hotel and food) and airline travel originating and ending in California are considered funds “spent in California.”Airline ticket purchases and payments made to out-of-state workers are not considered funds “spent in California.” However, funds spent by workers in California (e.g., hotel and food) are considered funds “spent in California.”
Group 3 The following documents are applicable to Group 3: Group 4 The following documents are applicable to Group 4: Amount Available and Minimum/ Maximum Funding Amounts There is up to $30,000,000 available for grants awarded under this solicitation. The total, minimum, and maximum funding amounts for each project group are listed below. Project Group Available funding Minimum amount Maximum amount Minimum match funding required (% of EPIC Funds Requested) Group 1: Test Bed Environment and Validation (Cal-Test Bed) $11,000,000 $9,000,000 $11,000,000 20% of requested funds that are not used for vouchers* Group 2: California Energy Product Evaluation (Cal-EPE) Hub $11,000,000 $9,000,000 $11,000,000 20% of requested funds 3: California Opportunities for Procurement (Cal-OP) $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 20% of requested funds
Has your organization ever filed for or does it plan to file for bankruptcy? Has any party that entered into an agreement with your organization terminated it, and if so for what reason? For Energy Commission agreements listed in the application that were executed (i.e., approved at a Commission business meeting and signed by both parties) within the past five years, has your organization ever failed to provide a final report by the date indicated in the agreement? Support or commitment letters (for match funding, test sites, or project partners) indicate a strong level of support or commitment for the project. Provides information described in Section II.B.2. Possible Points for criteria 1−4 (Minimum Passing for criteria 1−4 is 49.00) 70 Budget and Cost-Effectiveness Budget forms are complete, as instructed in Attachment 7. Justifies the reasonableness of the requested funds relative to the project goals, objectives, and tasks. Justifies the reasonableness of for direct labor, non-labor (e.g., indirect overhead, general and administrative costs, and subcontractor profit), and operating expenses by task. Explains why the hours proposed for personnel and subcontractors are reasonable to accomplish the activities in the Scope of Work (Attachment 6). Explains how the applicant will maximize funds for the technical tasks in Part IV of the Scope of Work and minimize expenditure of funds for program administration and overhead. The requested funding within the minimum and maximum range specified in Part I of this solicitation. 10
The project has not already been conducted at a full-scale pilot demonstration in a real-world setting. Pass Fail The project the eligible TRLs, aligns with an eligible Strategic Objective, demonstrates the appropriate ratepayer benefits, technological advancements and breakthroughs, and provides a Measurement and Verification Plan as specified in Section II.B. Project Requirements, for the funding group in which the applicant is applying for. Pass Fail The applicant has not included a statement or otherwise indicated that it will not accept the and conditions, or that acceptance is based on modifications to the terms and conditions. Pass Fail
Screening Criteria The Application must pass ALL criteria to progress to Stage Two. Pass/Fail The application is received by the Energy Commission’s Contracts, Grants, and Loans Office by the due date and time specified in the “Key Activities Schedule” in Part I of this solicitation and is received in the required manner (e.g., no emails or faxes). Pass Fail The Application Form (Attachment 1) is signed where indicated. Pass Fail The application addresses only one of the eligible project groups, as indicated on the Application Form. Pass Fail If the applicant has submitted more than one application for the same project each application is for a distinct project (i.e., no overlap with respect to the tasks described in the Scope of Work, Attachment 6). If the projects are not distinct and the applications were submitted at the same time, only the application screened by the Energy Commission will be eligible for funding. If the applications were submitted separately, only the first application received by the Energy Commission will be eligible for funding. Pass Fail The requested funding falls within the minimum and maximum range specified in Part I of this solicitation. Pass Fail If the project involves pilot testing/ demonstration activities: The Application Form identifies one or more test/ demonstration site locations. All demonstration sites are located in a California NG IOU service territory (PG&E, SDG&E, or SoCalGas Co.). Pass Fail N/A (project does not involve testing/ demonstration activities) The application does not contain any confidential information or identify any portion of the application as confidential. Pass Fail The applicant has not included a statement or otherwise indicated that it will not accept the and conditions, or that acceptance is based on modifications to the terms and conditions. Pass Fail For projects that do not include match funding: The proposal includes one or more support letters. When a site commitment letter is required (Section III.D.11), the proposal includes this letter. All letters are prepared as specified in Attachment 11. If the proposal includes commitment letters that are not required (including match funding letters) and do not meet the requirements of Attachment 11, the letters will not be considered in the scoring phase. Pass Fail
Rent or lease payments allocable to the hydrogen refueling station from the execution date of the agreement until the end of the agreement. For an item of cost to be allowable, it must be included in the approved agreement budget and allowable per the terms and conditions of the resulting agreement. The following are examples of unallowable costs under an agreement resulting from this solicitation. This list is not comprehensive and additional items of cost may be unallowable in accordance with the terms and conditions. Property taxes. Interest. Penalties. Any costs which do not meet the requirements set forth in Section II.C.1, General Requirements. Forgone Profit – For example, if a company usually charges 10% profit but only charges 4% to the Energy Commission. The unclaimed difference is not an allowable item of cost. Forgone Rent – For example, rents that are not paid is not an allowable item of reimbursable cost. Discounted or Refunded Equipment – For example, a claim that equipment costs $10,000 but recipient only pays $6,000 due to some “special” discount. The difference of $4,000 is not an allowable match share expense. Another example is if the recipient actually pays $10,000 but the vendor refunds $4,000 – only the net $6,000 is an allowable item of cost. Foregone Salary, Fringe, Indirect or Types of Cost – For example, a person normally charges or is paid $100 per hour, but will only charge $50 per hour towards the Energy Commission award. Only actual costs incurred and paid to the employee are allowable. Therefore, if an employee is actually paid $100 per hour and the Energy Commission only reimburses at $40 per hour, then the unreimbursed $60 per hour is an allowable match share cost because this is an actual payment as opposed to a foregone salary amount. Volunteer labor (i.e., labor from a person who does not receive any compensation for their labor) may be an allowable in-kind match share expense if the value of the labor is reasonable and justified. There is no match share funding requirement for this solicitation.
A total of $1,845,079 is available for awards under this solicitation. The Energy Commission, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to increase or decrease the amount of funds available under this solicitation. Proposed Geographic Distribution of Funding: In order to maximize the distribution of limited funds, applicants will compete in one of three project groups containing the geographic regions described in Table 1. Table 1 Project Group Maximum Amount Per Award Anticipated Number of Awards Group 1: A region containing Disadvantaged Communities in Northern California $200,000 3 Group 2: A region containing Disadvantaged Communities in Central California $200,000 3 Group 3: A region containing Disadvantaged Communities in Southern California $200,000 3 For purposes of this solicitation, the three project groups are defined as containing the following counties. Northern California: Alameda, Alpine, Butte, Contra Costa, Del Norte, El Dorado, Glenn, Humboldt, Lake, Lassen, Marin, Mendocino, Modoc, Mono, Monterey, Napa, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, San Francisco, San Luis Obispo, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Solano, Sonoma, Sutter, Tehama, Trinity, Yolo, and Yuba. Central California: Amador, Calaveras, Colusa, Fresno, Inyo, Kern, Kings, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Sacramento, San Benito, San Joaquin, Stanislaus, Tulare, and Tuolumne. Southern California: Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Santa Barbara, and Ventura. Only one application per multidisciplinary group may be submitted under this solicitation. Project partners may be a part of another multidisciplinary group applying to this solicitation. Applicants may submit multiple grant applications, however, applications cannot have overlapping geographic areas. The Energy Commission’s intent is to not fund multiple blueprints covering the same or similar geographic areas. Applicants are encouraged to work together within their regions to coordinate efforts into a single proposal. If multiple applications are received covering the same geographic region, the Energy Commission reserves the right to fund only the highest scoring application.
must be in Microsoft Word XP (.doc format) and Excel Office Suite formats unless originally provided in the solicitation in another format. Attachments requiring signatures may be scanned and submitted in PDF format. Completed Budget Forms, Attachments 4A and 4B, must be in Excel format. The system will not allow applications to be submitted after the due date and time. First time users must register as a new user to access the system. Applicants will receive a confirmation email after all required documents have been successfully uploaded. A tutorial of the system will be provided at the pre-application workshops and you may contact the Commission Agreement Officer identified in the Questions section of the solicitation for more assistance. An applicant may also deliver a hard copy of an application by: U. S. Mail In Person Courier service Applications submitted in hard copy must be delivered to the Energy Commission Contracts, Grants and Loans Office according to the schedule in Section I.G. If applications are delivered prior to the due date shown on this schedule, then they can be delivered during normal business hours (8 am – 5 pm) and prior to the date and time specified in this solicitation. Applications received after the specified date and time shown in Section I.G. are considered late and will not be accepted. There are no exceptions to this. Postmark dates of mailing, E-mail and facsimile (FAX) transmissions are not acceptable in whole or in part, under any circumstances. There is no need to submit a hard copy of an application that is submitted through the Grant Solicitation System as it will only cause confusion. Number of Copies Applicants submitting a hard copy application are only required to submit one paper copy. Applicants must also submit electronic files of the application on CD-ROM or USB memory stick along with the paper submittal. Electronic files must be in Microsoft Word XP (.doc format) and Excel Office Suite formats. Completed Budget Forms, Attachments 4A and 4B, must be in Excel format. Electronic files submitted via e-mail will not be accepted. Packaging and Labeling All hard copy applications must be labeled Funding Opportunity GFO-18-901," and include the title of the application. Include the following label information on the mailing envelope: Applicant’s Project Manager Applicant’s Name Street Address City, State, and Zip Code
Tertiary (Tier 3) Intervention Grid: For Elementary Schools Support Description School-wide Data: Entry Criteria Data to Monitor Progress Exit Criteria Individualized Plan Ongoing strategy involving identifying specific student characteristics for each phase of the cycles and implementing appropriate and evidence-based adult responses to managing student acting out behavior. One or more of the following: Behavior: SRSS-E7: High Office discipline referrals (ODRs) 6 or more within a grading period Identify a target behavior for the individual student. Include: (a) label for the behavior, (b) definition, (c) examples, and (d) non examples Set behavioral goal based on baseline performance of the behavior. Direct observation of the target behavior with data points graphed for decision making. Treatment Integrity: Treatment integrity checklist Social Validity: Teacher: IRP-15 Student: CIRP SRSS-E7 score: Low (0-3) Observation data demonstrate behavior is consistently within expected level (per goal; three consecutive data points) – then transition to maintenance plan and monitor behavior during transition.
Secondary (Tier 2) Intervention Grid: For Elementary Students Support Description School-wide Data: Entry Criteria Data to Monitor Progress Exit Criteria Opportunities to respond Increasing students’ opportunities to respond (OTR) is a strategy that helps students review material, acquire skill fluency, and commit information to memory while simultaneously increasing on-task behavior and reducing misbehavior. OTR strategy is designed to offer students frequent opportunities (i.e., 3 or more OTR per min) using either single-student (e.g., hand raising) or unison responding (e.g., choral responding), within a set time period (e.g., 10 min.) to respond to teacher questions or prompts about targeted academic material. This is best done with materials or concepts in which students have a basic understanding. One or more of the following: Behavior: SRSS-E7: Moderate (4-8) SRSS-I5: Moderate (2-3) SRSS-E7: High (9-21) SRSS-I5: High (4-15) SSiS-PSG Ranking of 1, 2, or 3 on the Motivation to Learn Office discipline referrals (ODRs) 2 or more within a grading period AND/OR Academic: Missing Assignments 2 of more within a grading period Progress report: Passing (K-3 Progressing or higher; 4-5 C or higher) in subject area targeted Student behavior targeted for improvement (e.g., academic engaged time, on-task, disruption; % of intervals) or weekly progress monitoring (e.g., weekly quiz score) Treatment integrity Implementation checklist Treatment integrity checklist Social validity IRP-15 (teacher) CIRP or OTR Social Validity Form(student) ODRs 0-1 in a grading period and No missing assignments in a grading period and SRSS-E7: Low SRSS-I5: Low or SSiS-PSG Ranking of 4 or 5 on the Motivation to Learn subscale
Secondary (Tier 2) Intervention Grid: For Elementary Students Support Description School-wide Data: Entry Criteria Data to Monitor Progress Exit Criteria Precorrection Plan to modify teacher behavior and environmental contexts where problem behaviors are likely to occur by providing supports, prompts, and reinforcement for appropriate student behavior, preventing problem behaviors from occurring One or more of the following: Behavior SRSS-E7: Moderate (4-8) SRSS-I5: Moderate (2-3) SRSS-E7: High (9-21) SRSS- I5: High (4-15) 2 or more office discipline referrals per day in a class ___ AND ___ OR Academic Consistent, predictable Student Performance direct measure of student behavior targeted for improvement Treatment integrity implementation checklist treatment integrity checklist Social validity IRP-15 (teacher) student-completed survey Meets targeted behavior criterion for 3 consecutive weeks Two consecutive weeks of zero discipline referrals during target time / activity and SRSS-E7: low risk (0-3) SRSS- I5: low risk (0-1)
pattern of academic errors Secondary (Tier 2) Intervention Grid: For Middle and High School Students Support Description School-wide Data: Entry Criteria Data to Monitor Progress Exit Criteria Precorrection Plan to modify teacher behavior and environmental contexts problem behaviors are likely to occur by providing supports, prompts, and reinforcement for appropriate student behavior, preventing problem behaviors from occurring One or more of the following: Behavior SRSS-E7: Moderate SRSS-E7: High (9-21) 1 or more office discipline referral per day in a class ___ AND ___ OR Academic Consistent, predictable pattern of academic errors Student Performance direct measure of student behavior targeted for improvement Treatment integrity implementation checklist treatment integrity checklist Social validity IRP-15 (teacher) Meets targeted behavior criterion for 3 consecutive weeks Two consecutive weeks of zero discipline referrals during target time / activity and SRSS-E7: low risk (0-3)
of Contents I. 1 A. 1 B. 1 C. 2 D. 2 E. 5 F. 6 G. 7 H. 8 II. 9 A. 9 B. 11 III. 13 A. 13 B. 15 C. 15 D. 17 IV. 20 A. 20 B. 21 C. 22 D. 23 E. 25 F. 31 Attachments 1 Application Form (requires signature) 2 Executive Summary Form 3 Fact Sheet Template 4 Project Narrative Form 4a Revised Project Narrative Form Cover Page (if applicable to Stage Two proposals) 5 Project Team Form 6 Scope of Work Template 6a Scope of Work Template: Project Schedule (Excel spreadsheet) 7 Budget Forms (Excel spreadsheet) 8 CEQA Compliance Form (requires signature) 9 Reference and Work Product Form 10 Contact List Template 11 Commitment and Support Letter Form (letters require signature) APPLICATION DELIVERY
Below is a description of each required Technical and Cost Proposal section of the application. Completeness in submitting all the required information requested in each attachment will be factored into the scoring: Technical Need and Merit This description should include how the project will advance, supplement and frame current technological and scientific understanding and knowledge. Include a comprehensive summary of the current status of renewable energy technologies, relevant data availability and knowledge of priority research worth further examining. Technical Approach As part of the proposal, the applicant shall provide a draft methodology for developing the Research Roadmap. If the proposal is funded, the draft methodology shall be further developed in Task 3. The proposal shall submit a technical approach to completing the Research Roadmap. The technical approach will be assessed based on the applicant’s response to each of the criteria listed below: Describes the technique, approach, and methods to be used in providing the services listed in the of Work, highlighting any outstanding features, qualifications and experience. Describes how tasks will be executed and coordinated with various participants and team members. Identifies and discusses factors critical for success, in addition to risks, barriers, and limitations. Provides a plan to address them. Describes how the knowledge gained, literature review results, and lessons learned will be made available to the public and key decision-makers. 3. Team Qualifications, Capabilities, and Resources Describes the organizational structure of the Bidder and the project team. Include an organizational chart that illustrates the structure. Identifies key team members, including the project manager and principal investigator. Provide a current resume for all team members listed, including job classification, relevant experience, education, academic degrees and professional licenses. Provides detailed estimates of hours for each task for each team member. Explains how the various tasks will be managed and coordinated, and how the project manager’s technical expertise will support the effective management and coordination of all activities described in the Scope of Work. Describes the facilities, infrastructure, and resources available to the team. Describes the team’s history of successfully completing projects. References are provided as required and are current, meaning within the past years (include this information in the Client References Form Attachment). References will be checked and scored accordingly. Identifies any collaboration with utilities, industries, or others. Explain the nature of the collaboration and what each collaborator will contribute. Demonstrates that the Bidder has the financial ability to complete the project, as indicated by the responses to the following questions:
Future updates TBD per Work Authorization Compliance application source code posted to open source on-line repository First update 3rd quarter 2020. Future updates TBD per Work Authorization Other deliverables to be defined as needed through Work Authorizations TBD per Work Authorization 6 Other deliverables to be defined as needed through Work Authorizations TBD per Work Authorization
From: NROTC Battalion Officer To: Incoming Scholarship Midshipmen Subj: NROTC UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND REQUIRED PAPERWORK FOR INCOMING STUDENTS ON SCHOLARSHIP 1. The following documents must be completed in order to participate as a Midshipman in the NROTC program with a 4-year National NROTC Scholarship. Please return this to us no later than 24-June. 2. For your convenience, we have developed a fillable PDF file and word Please only print and return all to us. 3. If any information to be hand written, please ensure you use black ink, print legibly in all capital letters, and sign all required signature spots in black ink. If you have any questions regarding the completion of any of the forms attached to this file please contact myself or our Human Resource Advisor for assistance. She may be reached either at 301-314-6291. 4. General guidance on the purpose of each of the forms included in this package: 03. NROTC Honor Code (NSTC 1533-121): This form acknowledges your understanding of the Midshipmen Honor Code. 04. Drug and Alcohol Statement of Understanding (NSTC 1533-153): This form establishes your understanding of the Department of the Navy’s drug and alcohol policy set forth in OPNAVINST 5350.7. 05. Drug Statement for NROTC Application (NSTC 1533-101) 06. Student Information Release Authorization This document authorizes the unit to collect official transcripts from UMBC. 07. Privacy Act Statement – Health Care Records 08. Navy Tattoo Screening Form Midshipmen shall be within Navy regulations. This form is utilized to determine if any tattoos or brandings do not meet Navy policy.
allowing her to use the Community Centre for free for four weeks while this project was carried out. 107. Accounts for Payment RESOLVED that the accounts for payment totalling £15,739.48 be approved. 108. Planning Planning lists were circulated as follows: Validated Applications: 5th September 2016 13th September 2016 21st September 2016 5th October 2016 Planning Decisions: 29th August – 2nd September 2016 5th – 9th September 2016 12th – 16th September 2016 No objections were made. In the absence of any further business, the Mayor thanked everyone for their attendance and closed the meeting.
Design Calculations 1 Interior Lighting 1 Telecommunications 2 Part 11 – Design – HVAC Paragraph 11.1 Design Criteria 1 Design Calculations 2 HVAC Systems – and Similar Buildings 3 HVAC Systems – Vehicle Maintenance Shops 5 HVAC Systems – Unheated Storage Buildings 7 Ductwork, Piping and Accessories 7 Testing, Adjusting and Balancing 8 11.8 Commissioning 8 Part 12 – Energy Conservation Paragraph 12.1 Energy Conservation Strategies 1 Part 13 – Design – Fire Protection Paragraph 13.1 Design Criteria 1 Fire Protection System Design and Calculations 1 Fire Protection Equipment 3 Fire Alarm and Mass Notification System 3 Part 14 – Sustainable Design Paragraph 14.1 Sustainable Design Goals 1 Sustainable Design Measures 1 Part 15 – Additional Requirements Paragraph 15.1 Building Envelope Sealing Performance Requirement 1 Warranties 2 Attachments to the Statement of Work Attachment A Preliminary Subsurface Characterization Report Attachment B Fire Flow Data Attachment C Installation Design Guide (or excerpts) Attachment D Site Photographs Attachment E [unassigned] Attachment F Sample Form 1354 Attachment G Fire Protection/Life Safety Code Submittal Format Attachment H [Other site, demolition, or hazmat information – if not applicable, indicate “Not used”] Attachment J Kitchen Equipment Information
Chronically homeless Substance abuse, health or mental health impairments Coming from the streets Criminal record Specialized population such as DV, LGBTQ, youth, veterans PERSONS IN HOUSEHOLDS WITH AT LEAST ONE ADULT AND ONE CHILD SUBPOPULATION Characteristics Chronically Homeless – Non veterans Chronically homeless - veterans homeless veterans Chronic Substance HIV/AIDS Severely Mentally Ill Victims of Domestic Violence Physical Disability disability Not Adults over age 24 Adults ages 18-24 Children under age 18 TOTAL PERSONS PERSONS IN HOUSEHOLDS WITHOUT CHILDREN SUBPOPULATION Characteristics Chronically Homeless – Non veterans Chronically homeless - veterans homeless veterans Chronic Substance Abuse HIV/AIDS Severely Mentally Ill Victims of Domestic Violence Physical Disability Developmental disability Not represented Adults over age 24 Adults ages 18-24 TOTAL PERSONS PERSONS IN HOUSEHOLDS WITH ONLY CHILDREN SUBPOPULATION Characteristics Chronically Homeless – Non veterans Chronically homeless - veterans homeless veterans Chronic Substance Abuse HIV/AIDS Severely Mentally Ill Victims of Domestic Violence Physical Disability Developmental disability Not represented Accompanied Children under age 18 Unaccompanied children under age 18 PERSONS 5C. PARTICIPANT OUTREACH the percentage of homeless person(s) who will be served by the project from each of the following locations. Directly from the street or locations not meant for human habitation. Directly from Emergency Shelters. Directly from Safe Havens. Persons fleeing domestic violence. Directly from transitional housing eliminated in a previous CoC Program Competition. Directly from the TH portion of a Joint TH and RRH component project
The dust partitions shall be wiped down daily with a moist cloth or dust catching device. Traffic between containment areas and protection areas shall be kept to a minimum. Keep doors into containment areas closed at all times. All vacuuming of area outside of the work area not within the barriers shall be done by the Constructor with HEPA vacuums. All pipes, conduit, punctures and exposures shall be sealed appropriately. Removal of debris from the project work areas shall be as follows: Removal of debris shall be done by the Constructor. The Constructor shall notify the Owner’s Representative when there is debris to be removed. Debris shall be removed on an “as needed” daily basis. Transport removed material in tightly sealed, rubber-tired containers provided by the Constructor to protect Protection Areas. The Owner’s Representative will review the type of cart and condition of the carts proposed for use. Containers shall be fitted with clean, tight fitting covers, completely sealed at perimeters by taping. Before leaving the Containment Area all containers be wiped or HEPA vacuumed clean to prevent tracking of dust. The cart shall be rolled over the adhesive faced contamination control mats inside the entrances. Place covers over debris boxes (roll-offs), truck beds etc., between periods when they are being filled. Supplies and tools shall be brought into the Containment Area in accordance with the following procedure: and supplies shall be wiped clean or wrapped in plastic sheeting and moved by Constructor provided rubber-tired carts/containers, from a staging area to the containment area (construction site). The containers shall be vacuumed with HEPA vacuum cleaners by the Constructor prior to moving through the occupied space to the Containment Area. The Constructor shall notify the Owner's Representative of the need to move these containers through Protection Areas prior to entering the Containment Area. Tool and supply removal from the Containment Area shall follow the same procedure specified for debris removal from the Containment Area. The following procedure shall be implemented when construction personnel are required to pass through a Protection Area to enter a Containment area: Personnel shall don protective clothing required by the Owner’s Representative within the Preparation Area before passing through Protection Areas. The constructor shall provide an anteroom within the dustproof enclosure. Protective clothing shall be removed in the anteroom prior to entering the Containment Area. The following procedure shall be implemented when construction personnel are required to pass from a containment area through a protection area: