Participants Addison, Trina • Virginia Department of Emergency Management Bagby, Jocelyn • Virginia Department of Emergency Management Bowdel, Jamey • Roanoke Police Department Jamey • Virginia Department of Fire Programs Brady, Mike • Harrisonburg Fire Department Braidwood, Robb • Chesapeake Emergency Management Burnette, Amy • Chesterfield Fire Department Clark , Daniel • South Boston Fire-EMS Coates, Robbie • Virginia Department of Emergency Management Costin, Ted • Virginia Department of Emergency Management Craig Ill, John • VA Association of Volunteer Rescue Squads Cullinan, Jay • Spotsylvania Fire, Rescue & Emergency Management Dan Brewer • Virginia Department of Emergency Management Darling, Rob • Virginia Fire Embrey, Matthew • Spotsylvania Fire, Rescue & Emergency Management Ezell, Barry • Virginia Modeling, Analysis and Simulation Center Foley, Lisa • Virginia Department of Emergency Management Foresman, Robert • Virginia Emergency Management Association Foster, Melissa • Lynchburg Department of Emergency Services Glazner, George • Newport News EOC Gower, James • Newport News Fire Department Graham, Tim • Salem Fire EMS Department Gregory, Pamela • City of Chesapeake Gurley, Michael • Hampton Roads Incident Management Team Helmuth, Paul • Harrisonburg Fire Department Hood, Kevin • Virginia State Police
Howard, Amy • Virginia Department of Emergency Management Janak, Isaac • Public Safety and Homeland Security Janssen, John • Virginia State Police, Virginia Fusion Center Johnson, Tonya • Virginia Department of Emergency Management King, Jack • Virginia Department of Emergency Management Lawsure, Kaleen • Virginia Modeling, Analysis and Simulation Center Lee, Cheryl • Virginia Department of Emergency Management Long, David • Hampton Roads Metropolitan Medical Response System Louder, Daryl • National Capitol Region – Incident Management Team Magalis, Kerry • Front Royal Police Department Mason, Glenn • Fairfax County Fire and Rescue Mason, Shawn • Virginia Department of Emergency Management Messmer, Debbie • Virginia Department of Emergency Management Mongold, Susan • Virginia Department of Emergency Management Moody, Katie • Richmond Regional Planning District Commission Perdue, Robert • Roanoke Fire-EMS Department Pittinger, Brook • Virginia Department of Fire Programs Rhodes, Jeff • Harrisonburg Fire Department Sadler, John • Hampton Roads Planning District Commission Scrivani, John • Virginia Department of Emergency Management Sehlhorst, KC (Cecil) • Chesterfield Fire and EMS Shawn Talmadge • Office of Public Safety and Homeland Security Smith, Justin • Town of Rocky Mount Police Department Snyder, Larry • Williamsburg Fire Department Spicer, • City of Suffolk Stacie Neal • Public Safety and Homeland Security Stern, Jeff • Virginia Department of Emergency Management Swanson, Bryan • Central Virginia Incident Management Team Taylor, Dillon • Virginia Department of Emergency Management
three must apply) Resource Sharing - The project has a credible plan to share resources. The plan has documentation (e.g. MOUs, contracts, etc.) that demonstrates collaboration and/or agreement from multiple jurisdictions, and/or multiple regions, and/or multiple disciplines (fire, police, emergency medical services). Non - Regional Crieria Scope - The proposal identifies specific jurisdiction(s), the impact to the jurisdiction(s) & how the interaction occurs. Capability Linkage - The project links to core capabilities and preparedness goals with a nexus to terrorism.
the project be easily replicated beyond the initial scope or area of initial concern (e.g. training, planning or some other document asset that can be implemented elsewhere)? In to allow for better differentiation between proposal scores, the scale that was applied to scores was changed in 2017 () and will also be applied in 2018. However, the scoring statements have been modified from the 2017 “Completely Agree” to “Completely Disagree” scale in order to help reduce subjectivity while evaluating projects (). Figure 7: 2017 SHSP Criteria Value Function Changes Breakout Group #2: Grant Topics Breakout Group #2 Activities: Discuss and provide recommendations for grant topics 1) “Regional” vs. “Non-Regional” scoring; 2) interoperability projects scoring; 3) cyber security projects scoring; 4) minimum and maximum award amounts; and 5) open discussion on other funding topics. Recommendations Move the risk and benefit criteria to regional criteria. Move criterion to non-regional criteria. Interoperability projects should continue to be scored on regional criteria by the State Interoperability Executive Committee (SIEC). security projects should be scored on regional criteria by the Cyber Security Program Manager of the Office of Public Safety and Homeland Security. Maintain the $10,000 minimum, and %10 of total grant funds available maximum on allowable funding requests.