zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Weekly duties Laboratory location: Clean all bench surfaces Clean floor Clean tissue culture hoods Initial each week on completion of tasks: Week commencing (dd-mon-yyyy) Initials Week commencing (dd-mon-yyyy) Initials Monthly duties Laboratory location: Clean all incubators, centrifuges and their buckets
Clean any water baths and refill Check laboratory stocks of all reagents Clean out unwanted items from fridges and freezers Initial and date on completion of duties: Year: Jan Feb Mar Apr Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Clean incubators ID: Date Initials ID: Date Initials ID: Date Initials ID: Date Initials Clean centrifuges and buckets ID: Date Initials ID: Date Initials Clean water baths and refill ID: Date ID: Initials ID: Date ID: Initials Check laboratory stocks of all reagents Date Initials Clear out unwanted items from fridges and freezers Date Initials
The Unsung Hero Award is presented to an individual, team or volunteer who works continuously and tirelessly behind the scenes, goes the extra mile with little thanks or has made an outstanding contribution. Heritage staff and members of the public are able to make nominations for this award. The individual needs to: Have shown commitment to their role. Show that they work for the good of the County’s heritage. Have improved a service or user experience. Any project/activity must have been delivered between July 2014 and May 2016 Please tell us your project/activity. Your description should aim to cover the following points: What the purpose of the project was Who was involved and how was the project managed? How the project was funded, including the overall cost of the project resources The benefits of the project to the organisation/team, workers, volunteers, visitors or users Problems encountered and overcome Please include any material that supports your entry. This may include photographs, press releases or publicity materials and feedback from users/visitors Closing date for entries Friday September 2nd 2016 Completed entries should be sent to: Jackie Goodall Forest Lodge Kirkby Lane Woodhall Spa LN106YY 01526352454 Sponsored by:
Author: Name: Jane Steele Signature: See original copy Function: Director, Advanced Therapies Facility Date: See original copy Reviewed by: Clinical Trials Oversight Committee Authorised by: Name: Wilma van Riel Signature: See original copy Function: Head of Clinical Research Compliance Date: See original copy Name: Professor Julian Bion Signature: See original copy Function: of the Clinical Trials Oversight Committee Date: See original copy Issue date: Supersedes: Procedures for GCP compliance in the laboratory v1.0 (EAv1.0) Reason for update: Findings and recommendations following MHRA inspection 23rd – 25th June 2015; clarification included regarding record keeping in relation to samples and assays. Review of final version: Date: Reviewed by: Signature: Outcome: Editorial Amendments Tick box if not applicable Supersedes:
Thank you for agreeing to undertake a peer review of this project, please ensure ALL sections are completed. Does the project address a clear research question? YES - satisfactory NO – requires improvement (please comment below) Does the background information adequately justify the study? YES - satisfactory NO – please comment below Is the methodology appropriate for the project? YES NO – please explain below Is the proposed sample size sufficient to answer the research question? YES NO – please suggest improvements below Is the importance to the NHS and service users clear? YES NO – please comment below Are the risks associated with the study justified by the potential for benefit? YES NO – please comment below Given the current proposal, is the study feasible and achievable (able to answer the research question) Very likely Probably – please explain concerns below Not likely - please offer advice below
References: (2011/C 172/01) Detailed guidance on the collection, verification and presentation of adverse event/reaction reports arising from clinical trials on medicinal products for human use (CT-3). Version 11.6.2011 ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline: Development Safety Update Report E2F – current Step 4 version dated 17th August 2010 DSUR Examples Non-commercial Sponsors: at time of writing Acknowledgements: The first version of this document has been based on the equivalent Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit document with feedback from the Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, the Primary Care Clinical Research and Trials Unit, and the UHB R&D department. We would like to thank all staff members within the CTUs and UHB R&D who have been involved in developing these documents for their time and efforts. .
Appendix 6: A cumulative tabulation of all Serious Adverse Events and for Appendix 8: A cumulative tabulation of all Serious Adverse Reactions to section table 6 of ICH E2F 2 separate reports are required: A tabulation of all SAEs (including SARs and SUSARs) that have occurred during the course of the trial (appendix 6) A tabulation of all SARs (including SUSARs) that have occurred during the course of the trial (appendix 8) Create a summary table as indicated below Include all SAEs/SARs (as applicable) reported throughout lifetime of trial Amend the number of columns as required to accommodate the appropriate number of treatment arms Report by coding that are referenced within section 7.1 of this document. If no coding has been used, group by body system as appropriate Include a for each category Example 1 – for non-blinded trials The exact detail will be dependent on the events reported. CTCAE Category Adverse Event Term Number of <insert Adverse Events or Adverse Reactions> <insert treatment arm 1> <insert treatment arm 2 etc> Allergy / Immunology Allergic reaction/ hypersensitivity (including drug fever) 1* 3 Vasculitis 4 1 Sub-total 5 4 Blood / Bone Marrow Platelets 0 2 Sub-total 0 2 Example 2 – for blinded trials The detail will be dependent on the events reported Reactions should only be listed under the relevant treatment arms where results have been unblinded. All other adverse reactions will be classed as ‘blinded’.
CTCAE Category Adverse Event Term Number of <insert Adverse Events or Adverse Reactions> Unblinded Blinded <insert treatment arm 1 > <insert treatment arm 2 etc> Allergy / Immunology Allergic reaction/ hypersensitivity (including drug fever) 1* 3 7 Vasculitis 4 1 7 5 4 14 / Bone Marrow Platelets 0 2 15 Sub-total 0 2 15
Clinical Trials Oversight Committee The Clinical Trials Oversight Committee (CTOC) provides sponsor oversight of UoB’s portfolio of Clinical Trials of Investigational Medicinal Products (CTIMPs). The CTOC also provides a means for the Research Governance Team to obtain expert advice relating to non-CTIMPs. The CTOC reports to the Pro-Vice Chancellor for Research & Knowledge Transfer through the University Research Governance and Ethics Group, and to the University of Birmingham Internal Audit Office. CRCT See ‘Clinical Research Compliance Team’ A Clinical Trial of an Investigational Medicinal Product CTOC See: ‘Clinical Trials Oversight Committee’ CTU managed study A for which the overall study management or the majority of study management duties has been delegated to the CTU on behalf of a Sponsor. Examples include all or most of the activities of Registration, Site Initiation, Monitoring, IMP supply, Pharmacovigilance, Data Management and Statistical Analysis. GCP Good Clinical Practice guidelines MDS College of Medical and Dental Sciences MHRA Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency; the Competent Authority in the UK Principal Investigator The person responsible for the conduct of the clinical trial at a trial site. If a trial is conducted by a team of individuals at a trial site, the principal investigator is the leader responsible for the team and may be called the Principal Investigator. QMS See ‘Quality Management System’ Quality Management System A Quality Management System (QMS) is a system that includes procedures and policies to describe how certain tasks should be performed and that encapsulate any standards and/or regulatory requirements that may apply to those tasks. By adhering to the Quality Management System, the user and the UoB will be assured that applicable regulations are adhered to. RGT See ‘Research Governance Team’ Research Governance Team The Research Governance Team is part of the Research Governance and Ethics Team and is responsible for confirmation of Sponsorship on behalf of the UoB, signing-off any applications for approval/authorisation as Sponsor representative, issuing trial specific template Site Agreements, and for maintaining Sponsor oversight. SAF See ‘Self-Assessment Form’ Self-Assessment Form UoB Ethical Review of Research Self-Assessment Form
Editorial Amendments Tick box if not applicable UoB-CLN-SBR-SOP-001 Serious Breach reporting v2.0 Editor: Name: Conor McGoldrick Signature: See original copy Function: Clinical Trials Compliance Officer Date: See original copy Authoriser: Name: Wilma van Riel Signature: See original copy Function: Head of Clinical Research Compliance Date: See original copy
Development summary: Author: Name: Cara Lax-Williams Signature: See original copy Function: CRCTU Quality Assurance Officer Date: See original copy Reviewed by: Sarah Bowden, CRCTU Director of Operations Prof. Keith Wheatley, CRCTU Scientific Director Isobel Hawley, CRCTU QA Manager (maternity cover) Jane Daniels, BCTU Deputy Director Natalie Ives, BCTU Senior Statistician Razia Meer-Baloch, PC-CRTU QA Manager Clinical Trials Oversight Committee Authorised by: Name: Prof. Julian Bion Signature: See original copy Function: Chair of Clinical Trials Oversight Committee Date: See original copy Name: Wilma van Riel Signature: See original copy Function: Clinical Trials Quality Assurance Manager Date: See original copy Issue date: 27-Apr-2015 Supersedes: N/A Reason for update: N/A Review of final version: Date: Reviewed by: Signature: Outcome: N/A
Sample collection, receipt and anonymisation Records management Premises, equipment and facilities Non-conformance Training See references for applicable regulations Develop audit plans Define the aims and objective of the audit Determine the scope Determine the resources required Determine the audit methodology Determine timelines for generating an audit report and audit response report Decide who are the key stakeholders who should receive the audit report and audit response report, and describe what the stakeholders will receive (e.g. full report or summary) Ensure the plan is reviewed by the Audit Manager or delegate; where the Audit Manager writes the audit plans it is recommended to have the audit plan reviewed by another suitably qualified individual Plan audit Develop tools Inform auditee of and confirm scope, inputs, timing and resources required Ensure the submission of documents/information by auditee pre-audit as requested by the auditor Clarify who should receive the audit report alongside the auditee Perform audit Perform checks against plan and review of key processes through document review and interviews Escalate significant issues within required timeframes and following the applicable standards and regulations and, where appropriate, that are outlined in the topic-specific QMS. Note: if significant issues are identified and need further exploration the can deviate from the plan It is recommended that the auditor with auditee to discuss findings Ensure the auditee is informed of the timeframes surrounding the generation of the report and audit response report Write audit report Consider a review by the Audit Manager (or delegate) as outlined, where appropriate, in the relevant topic-specific QMS Ensure the audit report is sent to the auditee within the set timeframes and that copies are forwarded to the pre-agreed relevant parties Audit Response Report Auditee provides audit response report within the agreed timeframe, where applicable Review auditee’s response report where applicable. Where required request further clarification; where the response report addresses the findings appropriately progress to audit closure. Audit closure Consider generating an audit certificate to be forwarded to the auditee and relevant parties to be added to their files. Forward relevant information to key stakeholders; stakeholders may discuss and decide if organisational CAPA is required as per their local procedures. File all relevant documentation
approach is adopted it should be flagged during the insurance referral of the trial so that the Research Insurance Administrator can flag to the insurance provider. *** A warranty on the equipment may be applicable. The Property Damage risk may be subject to agreement for management of the equipment. Where equipment is provided by the Sponsor to a site to support a trial, an agreement should make clear who owns the equipment, who is responsible for maintaining it and who bears the risk should the equipment malfunction or be used inappropriately. If equipment is being shared as part of a study and the University is retaining ownership, then this should be flagged to the Research Insurance Administrator so that insurance of the equipment can be discussed with the insurance provider
Senior year can be expensive! PLAN AHEAD NOW! Below is a list of tentative costs that may arise and we want you to be prepared. Start budgeting! Expense Vendor Estimated Cost Timeline ASB Sticker BHS $20 Year round Yearbook Jostens www.jostensyearbook.com Click on Bakersfield High School $75 online until Sept. 15th/$80 in the BHS Finance Office until Dec. 22nd Sold all year but buyearly before the price goes up! Senior Portraits Carlos Murillo Photography 661-332-4170 *Must use this photographer for the yearbook photo! Price varies depending on the package; Yearbook-only session is free Make appointments June 1-Nov. 15 Cap & Gown Herff Jones 4300 Easton Drive www.hjbakersfield.com $17.50 (Late fee added after Feb. 28th) Order early in September! Grad Announcements, Class rings, Lettermen Jackets, etc Jostens 1612 20th Street www.jostens.com Price varies depending on package or order Order early— Sept-Dec SATs (if taking them) www.collegeboard.org $54.50 if you register early (more if you register late) All year depending on when you register College Application Fees Visit college websites Visit college websites for application costs. (~$60-$100 each) November 30th is the deadline to apply to most CA colleges WINTER FORMAL!!! December 2nd, 2017 BHS ASB $40-$60 Nov/Dec PROM!!! TBA BHS Junior Class $40-$60 April/May AP Testing (if taking them) See Mrs. Olejnik in IT 103 for more info $92 each April Grad Nite @ Magic Mountain PTSA (Parent Club) $80 Early Bird $90 Regular Price 5th lunch by Cafeteria Early Bird sale in March; Regular Sale in May Senior Breakfast/ Hypnotist Show BHS Senior Class $10 May Reminder: These costs are only estimates…prices are subject to change throughout the year.Be sure to pay off all debts early! You must have all debts paid to purchase Formal and Prom tickets and in order to get your graduation tickets at the end of the year!
Risk Assessment Guidance The assessor can assign values for the hazard severity (a) and likelihood of occurrence (b) (taking into account the frequency and duration of exposure) on a scale of 1 to 5, then multiply them together to give the rating band: Hazard Severity (a) Likelihood of Occurrence (b) 1 – Trivial (eg discomfort, slight bruising, self-help recovery) 2 – (eg small cut, abrasion, basic first aid need) 3 – Moderate (eg strain, sprain, incapacitation > 3 days) 4 – Serious (eg fracture, hospitalisation >24 hrs, incapacitation >4 weeks) 5 – Fatal (single or multiple) 1 – Remote (almost never) 2 – Unlikely (occurs rarely) 3 – Possible occur, but uncommon) 4 – Likely (recurrent but not frequent) 5 – Very likely (occurs frequently) The risk rating (high, medium or low) indicates the level of response required to be taken when designing the action plan. 1 2 3 4 5 2 4 6 8 10 3 6 9 12 15 4 8 12 16 20 5 10 15 20 25
Otter Creek Watershed Council (UOCWC) Summer 2015 Water Quality Monitoring Program Submitted by Rutland Natural Resource Conservation District (RNRCD) 170 South Main Street Rutland, VT 05701 Submitted to VT Department of Environmental Conservation 2015 Otter Creek Water Quality Monitoring Results Sample Locations All sampling sites monitored for this project were located in Rutland County on the main stem of the Otter Creek or on significant tributaries to the Otter Creek. The following table lists all of the sites monitored in 2015 and their location in the watershed. Table 1: Sample names and locations for Upper Otter Creek Watershed Council Summer 2015 water quality monitoring project. Site Description tenn1.0 Lincoln Avenue (Rotary Park) – Rutland tenn0.8 Baxter St. at Confluence with East – Rutland east0.2 Off of Meadow Street at recreation area – Rutland east2.1 Giorgetti Park – Rutland
East 0.2 7/21/2015 Turbidity 2.61 2.17 2.39 -0.44 18.4100 * Tenn 0.8 7/7/2015 Turbidity 1.85 1.87 1.86 0.02 1.0753 Tenn 1.0 6/23/2015 Turbidity 11.10 10.50 10.80 -0.60 5.5556 11.2252 * These values exceeded the limits for turbidity but are still below standards.
Make the test rig. Find the middle point of the top of the frame. Drill a hole just larger than your eye bolt; it will be attached up there (Figure 3a and 3b). Cut the steel pieces into 2- 8inch pieces. Measure the of the U-bolt and drill holes into both pieces of the metal so that the U-bolt can slide into it. (Figure 4a) Attach the U bolt to the bottom of the crane scale and the eye bolt to the top; your machine is complete. (Figure 4b)
Does the relationship appear to be linear? Why? Yes, the relationship appears to be linear because it seems to be decreasing in similar intervals after each bite. Is the relationship increasing or decreasing? How do you know? The relationship is decreasing because the length of the licorice is getting smaller with each bite. Whether the relationship appears to be linear or not, perform a linear regression of the form y = mx + b. the regression equation below. y=-1.7x+15.9 If done by hand, may be y=-2x+16 The value of b represents the y-intercept of the regression equation. What is your b value? Be sure to include units! 15.9 cm What does the y-intercept tell you in this situation? The length of the Twizzler before a bite was taken out of it. What would you expect the y-intercept of your graph to be? What variables could account for this difference in the expected y-intercept and the actual y-intercept of your regression equation? I would expect it to be 16.5 cm. The line of best fit may not have been drawn perfectly. The value of m represents the slope (or rate of change) of the regression equation. What is your m value? Be sure to include units! slope is -1.7 cm/bite Use the regression equation to predict the number of bites it would take you to eat 5 cm of licorice. 6 bites Use the regression equation to determine the amount of licorice you could eat in 7 bites. About 11 cm
free up considerable time so that each department can spend more time managing other work and projects. assist in controlling processes is currently carried out using various systems transparency of the Tender/ordering process electronic storage of documents and associated filing. better Contract management opportunities greater visibility of Contracts (including renewal dates) ability to assess supplier performance regularly reduction in ordering and payment costs, bringing about transactional savings and a paperless process data recording and analysis spend and supplier analysis There are a number of benefits of other arising out of establishing an eTendering portal including. Smaller businesses (SMEs) will benefit from what will be a user friendly system and will be encouraged to use the system through the web, thus reducing their own costs. In keeping with the Glover Report. greater control over the use of collaborative or corporate spending, Contract arrangements, eliminating rogue and maverick spending. improved management information on and suppliers will be available to assist the University in planning future procurement activity, allocation of resources and in sourcing. subsequent reductions in the costs of goods and services will arise, contributing to the Annual Efficiency Statement Targets. improved IT literacy for staff involved in electronic processing bringing about improved efficiency. evidence of being well managed - the University can benefit from any kudos associated with this progressive approach. There have been a number of different definitions of potential savings arising out of eProcurement. A commonly accepted cost comparison used by The Office of Government and Council (OGC) in their Value for Money (VFM) Improvement Programme accepts that the creation of eSystems will contribute to potential cost savings. 4.4 Purchasing Cards The NatWest Purchasing Card is a corporate credit card that assists the University to better manage business expenses. The card is 'VISA' badged and can be used in outlets worldwide, including approximately 460,000 outlets in the . The card can be used to pay for goods and services of low value, conference and seminar fees, accommodation charges, vehicle hire and other travel expenses and for goods bought from approved University suppliers. Staff using these cards cannot obtain cash.
Opplyst inngangseffekt DB x,xx x,xx kW Fastsatt COP COPB x,xx x,xx Parametrer ved delbelastning og omgivelsestemperatur 15 °C (punkt (C) Opplyst kuldeytelse Pc x,xx x,xx kW Opplyst inngangseffekt Dc x,xx x,xx kW Fastsatt COP COPC x,xx x,xx Parametrer ved delbelastning og omgivelsestemperatur 5 °C (punkt (D) Opplyst kuldeytelse PD x,xx x,xx kW Opplyst inngangseffekt DD x,xx x,xx kW Fastsatt COP COPD x,xx x,xx Parametrer ved full belastning og omgivelsestemperatur 43 °C (der dette er relevant) Kuldeytelse P3 x,xx x,xx kW Inngangseffekt D3 x,xx x,xx kW Fastsatt COP COP3 x,xx x,xx Andre opplysninger Kapasitetskontroll fast/trinnvis/variabel Koeffisient for effektivitetstap for aggregater med fast og trinnvis ytelse Cdc 0,25
4 – 16 1,05 18 – 2 153,22 32 12 386,42 5 – 15 1,74 19 – 1 203,41 33 13 389,84 6 – 14 2,98 20 0 247,98 34 14 384,45 7 – 13 3,79 21 1 282,01 35 15 370,45 8 – 12 5,69 22 2 275,91 36 16 344,96 9 – 11 8,94 23 3 300,61 37 17 328,02 10 – 10 11,81 24 4 310,77 38 18 305,36 11 – 9 17,29 25 5 336,48 39 19 261,87 12 – 8 20,02 26 6 350,48 40 20 223,90 13 – 7 28,73 27 7 363,49 41 21 196,31 14 – 6 39,71 28 8 368,91 42 22 163,04 43 23 141,78 49 29 43,35 55 35 2,09 44 24 121,93 50 30 31,02 56 36 1,21 45 25 104,46 51 31 20,21 57 37 0,52 46 26 85,77 52 32 11,85 58 38 0,40
Executive Summary UofL President James Ramsey signed the American College and University Presidents Climate Commitment in 2008. The university released its in September, 2010, as a comprehensive roadmap for achieving a climate neutrality goal over the next four decades. A summary of the Plan and a link to the full document can be found on the UofL’s sustainability web site at . Our Executive Vice President and University Provost, Shirley Willihnganz, has championed sustainability, local foods and community supported agriculture with her commitment exemplified by the Sustainability Council and the Assistant to the Provost for Sustainability initiative answering directly to her office. This Zero Waste Strategic Plan is the first comprehensive examination of the University of Louisville’s materials and waste reduction and diversion programs representing a major step toward UofL’s leadership role as a higher education institution in the area of sustainability, not only in Kentucky, but in the southeast region and the United States. This plan will provide the basis for moving towards zero waste to landfill as a part of our sustainability efforts.
PATIENT STICKER Past Med/Surg Hx: Date: Admit Date: MD: RN: Age: Allergies: Code Status: Isolation Type: Why: HX Admission Hx: 24 Hour Events: NEURO Sedation/Analgesia/Paralytics: Orientation: Cam ICU: Motor Movement: CIWA Score: GCS: E: 1 2 3 4 V: 1 2 3 4 5 M: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Other Neuro: EVD/Bolt □ ICP Range: Spinal Precautions: Full T&Ls Cleared CARDIAC Rhythm: HR Range: BP Range: Map: CVP: CI: PA: SvO2 IV Drips/Rates: Ectopy: Edema: Pulses: Titration Goals: RESP Lung Sounds: RR: SpO2: O2 Type: Vent: Most Recent ABG: pH / PaCO2 / PaO2 /HCO3 Lactate: ETT/Trach Size: ETT Depth: IS Volumes: Extubated @ Chest X-ray Ordered: Yes No RENAL 24 Hour Total Ins ______ Total Outs ______ Net _______ Foley: Labs CRRT Goals: Ins Outs IVs/Meds Urine Tube Feeds GI PO Intake Drains Blood Products 1. PRBCs 2. FFP 3. Platelets Chest Tubes Cryo 1. Albumin 2.
GeoGebra Basics Practice Answer Key Spheres Student Independent Practice Teacher note: Have students perform the radii measurements and the requested relative distances using Figure 1 as a referene. Require them to provide their answers to four decimals places. Expect the numbers obtained by students to be slightly different from the ones in this answer key (but at least the same integer part and first decimal) and vary from student to student. Figure 1. Marble spheres of assorted Set Up a Work Session Open a new GeoGebra session. Use the full screen window. In Graphing View, insert the picture file, MarbleSpheres.jpg, which is the same image as Figure 1. Place the lower left image corner at the origin, and the lower right corner at (10.64, 0). Set the image as the background. Exercises Estimate the on-screen radius for sphere 13. What is this Sphere 13 on screen radius (r2 ≈ 0.4391): r ≈ 0.6626 If the real diameter of sphere 13 is 5.62 cm, estimate the real radius of sphere 1. Sphere 1 on screen radius (r2 ≈ 0.6201): r ≈ 0.7875. Using a simple proportion: Sphere 1 estimated real radius: r ≈ 3.3397 cm
Water Filtration Project Rubric Beginning Developing Proficient Advanced Total Attentiveness (25%) Was uncooperative; was disrespectful of others 10 points Was quiet when others spoke 15 points Participated actively in discussion; asked questions 20 points Participated actively in discussion; was respectful ; asked relevant questions 25 points Researching (25%) Did not participate 10 points Used resources 15 points Used appropriate resources 20 points Worked well with others; offered several suggestions explaining rational; used appropriate resources correctly 25 points Teamwork (15%) Was uncooperative; was disrespectful of others 7 points Contributed a little; was quiet when others spoke 12 points Participated actively in discussion; was considerate of others’ contribution 14 points Worked well with others; participated actively in discussion; was respectful and encouraging 15 points Planning (10%) Did not participate 5 points Offered one idea 8 points Offered more than one suggestion 9 points Worked well with others; offered several suggestions explaining rational 10 points Filtration System (25%) Water does not appear any different 10 points Some particulates were removed, but water is still dirty (suitable for plants) 15 points Many particulates were removed (suitable for animals) 20 points Water is visibly cleaner; most particulates were removed (suitable for humans) Do NOT drink the water! 25 points
Practice Problems Worksheet Answer Key Show complete solutions to the following problems and box final answers with units. A sample of an unknown material weighs 300 N in air and 200 N when submerged in an alcohol solution with a density of 0.70 x 103 kg/m3. What is the density of the material? Given: Fg(air) = 300 N Fg(alcohol) = 200 N ρalcohol = 0.7 x 103 kg/m3 Unknown: ρmaterial or ρo Solution: FB = Fg(air) – Fg(alcohol) = 300 N – 200N FB = 100 N Fg(air) / FB = ρo / ρalcohol ρo = Fg(air) / FB * ρalcohol = (300 N / 100 N) * 0.7 x 103 kg/m3 ρo = 2.1 x 103 kg/m3 A 40-cm tall glass is filled with water to a depth of 30 cm. What is the gauge pressure at the bottom of the glass? What is the absolute pressure at the bottom of the glass? Given: h = 30 cm = 0.3 m g = 9.81 m/s2 ρwater = 1.0 x 103 kg/m3 Uknown: Pgauge Pabsolute Solution: Pgauge = ρgh = (1.0 x 103 kg/m3) (9.81 m/s2) (0.3 m) Pgauge = 2.9 x 103 kg/m3 Pa Pabsolute = Patm + Pgauge Pabsolute = 1.01 x 105 Pa + 2.9 x 103 kg/m3 Pa Pabsolute = 1.04 x 105 Pa
Calculate the absolute pressure at an ocean depth of 1.0 x 103 m. Assume that the density of the water is 1.025 x 103 kg/m3 and that P0 = 1.01 x 105 Pa. Given: h = 1.0 x 103 m ρ = 1.025 x 103 kg/m3 Patm or Po = 1.01 x 105 Pa Unknown: Pabsolute Solution: Pabsolute = Patm + Pgauge Pabsolute = Patm + ρgh = 1.01 x 105 Pa + (1.025 x 103 kg/m3) (9.81 m/s2) (1.0 x 103 m) Pabsolute = 1.01 x 107 Pa A tank has a spigot near its bottom. If the top of the tank is open to the atmosphere, determine the speed at which the water leaves the spigot when the water level is 0.5 m above the spigot. Given: P1 = Patm = 1.01 x 105 Pa = P2 (both are open to atmosphere) v1 = 0 (negligible) h1 = 0.5 m h2 = 0 m Unknown: v2 Solution: P1 + ½ ρ v12 + ρgh1 = P2 + ½ ρ v22 + ρgh2 P1 + ρgh1 = P2 + ρgh2 v2 = sqrt(2gh1) v2 = sqrt(2 (9.81 m/s2) (0.5m)) v2 = 3.13 m/s
Physics Problem Solving Rubric Criteria & Rating 5 4 3 2 1 Strategic Approach (S) Approach chosen is clearly shown, clearly written & all elements are valid. Valid approach with minor errors that do not disrupt understanding. Valid approach with multiple errors that impede understanding. Invalid approach that demonstrates little understanding of the problem. Little or no understanding of how to approach the problem. Physics Concepts (P) Appropriate concepts that are fully understood (symmetries, conserved quantities, etc.), clearly stated & employed correctly. Appropriate concepts that are mostly understood but employed with errors. Appropriate concepts identified, but not employed or understood. At least one concept identified but unable to demonstrate understanding. Little or no understanding of physics concepts. Mathematical Concepts (M) Correct starting equations; all mathematical steps are clearly shown and they flow easily toward the correct answer. Correct starting equations. All mathematical steps are clearly shown but minor errors yield wrong answer. OR Correct starting equations with correct result but the mathematical steps are hard to follow. Correct starting equations. The mathematical are hard to follow and errors begin to impede application. Can identify at one equation, but unable to apply it/them. Incorrect equations; demonstrates little or no understanding of mathematical concepts involved. Answer (A) 100% correct answer – analytically (IA) numerically (IA) & conceptually (IA). Correct answer analytically (IA), but not numerically (IA). Incorrect answer, but on the right path. Unable to reach a correct answer on this path. No answer. KEY: IA= If applicable; score of zero = incomplete assignment (NSW = no shown work or MS = missing assignment). Additional
Contacts: Rachael Adair / Clare Lee Monks Road Lincoln LN2 5HQ Email: Tel: 01522 876 232 Public enquiries: 01522 876 000 10. John Leggott College Sue Fry West Common Lane Scunthorpe South Humberside DN17 1DS Tel: 01724 282 998 Email: Public enquiries: 01724 282 998 11. Moulton College Claire Loake – Librarian West Street Moulton Northamptonshire NN3 7RR Tel: 01604 673545 Fax: Email: Public enquiries: 01604 673545 12. Northampton College Grazyna Kuczera Head Librarian Booth Lane Northampton NN3 3RF G Public enquiries: 01604 734 208 13. Tresham College of Further & Higher Education Dr Sarah Crudge Library and Learning Resources Manager Windmill Avenue Kettering Northamptonshire NN15 6ER Public enquiries: 01536 413 163 14. North Warwickshire & Hinckley College Lesley John Hinckley Road Nuneaton Warwickshire CV11 6BH Email: Catalogue: Public enquiries: 02476 243 130 15. Bournville College of Further Education Sarinder Singh – Librarian Bristol Road South Birmingham, B31 2AJ Email: Public enquiries: 0121 483 1000 16. Fircroft College of Further Education Helene Pursey 1018, Bristol Road, Selly Oak Birmingham, B29 6LH Email: Public enquiries: 0121 472 0116 17. Halesowen College Elizabeth Tromans Whittingham Road Halesowen, West Midlands, B63 3NA Email:
To facilitate this process, given the complexity of the University as an organisation and the diversity of its activities, the environmental aspects have been grouped into several environmental aspect clusters. Each of these aspect clusters is significant, although the significance of individual elements within them may vary. The significance of each of the individual elements that make up the clusters will help to inform the development of future action plans. The significant environmental aspect clusters are: Resource Efficiency (Procurement & Products): this takes into account all of the embedded carbon emissions and other environmental impacts in the products and services used by the University in its day-to-day activities. This is a core element of the life-cycle and includes emissions arising from the extraction of raw materials, manufacturing and transportation. It also includes all of the waste products that are produced as a result of procurement activity. Travel and Transport: this includes business travel by employees using their own cars as well as public transport and flights. It also includes staff and student commute. Although data for all of these elements is not currently available it is recognised that they are a significant part of the University’s overall environmental impact. Energy and this includes gas, electricity, potable water and waste water. Environmental Pollution: this includes all of the chemicals and emissions that are released to the environment through normal day to activities or as a result of accidents. It includes emissions to land, air or water including fugitive gases, spillages and toxins released through burning. Biodiversity & Landscape: this relates to the University’s interaction with the local environment including the impact of the built estate. It also includes a number of positive aspects such as the conservation work carried out by Ness Gardens and the management of biodiversity in campus green spaces. Global Impact – Research and Learning: this includes the positive global impacts of sustainability related research as well as the positive global impacts of graduates as sustainability advocates. It also includes the global, and regional impacts of the University’s role in strategic partnerships. Interested Parties ISO 14001:2015 places significant emphasis on the needs and expectations of interested parties and how these should be taken into account in the shape and development of the EMS. The needs and expectations of UoL’s interested parties have been mapped and the overall themes that have emerged are: the importance of effective communication, the timely completion of data, compliance with all legal and other requirements, strong strategic leadership and partnership working. Key interested parties for the University of Liverpool include: Undergraduates/postgraduates/researchers/ course participants
GRAND CORRUPTION AS A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY MAULEEN AWUOR Abstract. This research seeks to relate grand corruption and crimes against humanity and to see whether or not it is possible to prosecute grand corruption as an international crime and how easy or hard is it to achieve that. “We believe there are some forms of corruption so grave, whose effects on human life, human rights, and human welfare are so catastrophic, that they should shock the conscience of the international community and mobilize the will of nations to act across borders,” Akaash Maharaj told a side event on one of the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) conference in Panama City.
Subject Screening Log Subject Enrollment Log Randomization Log (If applicable) Organize Research Subject Records and Ensure Availability of the Following: Completed Yes No Comments Original Signed and Dated Informed Consent Documents for each research participant along with addendums as applicable Completed Case Report Forms Source documentation to support the subject: Met all entrance criteria Received test article per protocol Had f/u visits performed per protocol windows Had laboratory tests per protocol and lab reports were signed by the PI Had other diagnostic tests as applicable per protocol Was evaluated for and treated as applicable for AEs ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Documentation for protocol exceptions or deviations Ensure resolution of all queries
The amount of societal language input at home has been found to have a greater, negative impact on the HL than it has a positive impact on the acquisition of the societal language (De Houwer 2007; Hammer et al. 2009; Hoff et al. 2014). Furthermore, the effect of parental use of the societal language at home may be modulated by the proficiency of the input-provider (Chondrogianni & Marinis 2011; Goldberg et al. 2008). Whilst the differential effect of variation in input quantity on the (rate of) acquisition in many domains of language is undisputed, it is also clear that this relationship is non-linear in nature. In other words, threshold effects exist (e.g., Cattani et al. 2014; Gutiérrez-Clellen & Kreiter 2003; Thordardottir 2014) and not all linguistic properties are affected equally (Chondrogianni & Marinis 2011; Oller et al. 2007; Unsworth 2014, 2016b; cf. Hoff et al. 2012l; Paradis 2011). Research on the impact of variation in input quality has for the most part been restricted to studies on societal language development, with the notable exception of the studies by Place and Hoff (2011, 2015) and LaMorgia (2011). For example, it has been shown that input from native speakers is associated with more advanced vocabulary in the societal language, even after controlling for amount of input in that language (Place & Hoff 2011, 2015; see also Driessen et al., 2002). Furthermore, linguistically rich input (e.g., from different sources, including TV and reading) predicts rate of acquisition (e.g., Paradis 2011), and the number of speakers providing input is also a significant predictor of children’s (HL) development (Place & Hoff 2015). One other important aspect of HL children’s language experience is how much they use the language themselves. Indeed, children’s own HL use has been found to predict language outcomes in a number of studies (Bohman et al. 2010;
Quick and Easy Checklist for Attachments - See program guide for details Location Map (Required) Should show the location of the project within your community, identifying the main roads in the community that provide access. Note other infrastructure that surrounds it. If it is a trail, it should show how it links to other recreational amenities or other trails (if applicable). Recreational site plan or conceptual drawing (Required) Second map should show a recreational site plan or conceptual drawing with enough detail to determine design details such as orientation and layout of the project itself. Conceptual design or engineered plans (Recommended). If engineered plans or conceptual designs have been completed, please provide copies. Letter of support from the local tourism or economic development office. (Required) Letter of support should give a ballpark estimate of community impact or economic impact of the proposed infrastructure project. Statement of responsibility for long-term maintenance of the built infrastructure. (Required) A model for this can be found in the program guide. Letters of support from project partners (if applicable). If the applicant has no partners for the project, this is not a requirement. Letter of support from the community (highly recommended). Letters of support from the community can underscore the importance of the infrastructure to the community. Project budget spreadsheet (Required) Download a copy of the spreadsheet on the webpage. An example is in program guide Written confirmation of donations from financial partners (if applicable). Provide written confirmation of donations from any partners who will be providing cash or in-kind donations for the construction of the project. This information can be included a letter of support from financial partners or contributing sponsors. Project timeline (Required) Download a copy of the timeline on the webpage. An example is in program guide. MOU or landowner agreement (if applicable). If the property is owned and managed by the grant applicant such as a local or tribal government, then such an agreement is not needed. Federal permits or a letter stating their status (if applicable). If the project is being built on federal land or within the country’s navigable inland waterways, you will need to provide the appropriate federal permits and documents
Specialist Fire Services Requirements Gas Suppression or VESDA (Very Early Smoke Detection Apparatus) infrastructure equipment – advise total weight & issues Anti-vibration requirements or table / other large infrastructure General Other specialist water supply Please specify Sink and/or handwash Safety shower and/or eyewash Compressed air Cardax reader, back to base alarm, other security or access control Other Specify other WHS measures Life Safety System for hazardous substances Please specify Additional fire hazards Please specify Other special services? Site compatibility issues check Site requirement / issue Service needed Y / N Service available at site Y / N Comments Equipment causes vibration, or electrical or magnetic interference Equipment is vibration sensitive, or sensitive to electromagnetic interference Space accreditation required: PC Lab/Clean Room/Animal Facility/Laser Facility Please provide details Specialist finishes Other – specify Specialist delivery costs & services not included in purchase contract Delivery and access Service needed Y / N Service available at site Y / N Comments Crane, specialist removals/delivery contractor, scaffolding, special access, other Decant/ temporary relocation required to enable refurbishment or installation to proceed Yes / No (If yes, confirm requirements and if temporary space allocated to enable this to occur) Delivery access has been confirmed Yes / No (Door widths, corridor goods lift, forklift access, loading dock access is compatible with equipment dimensions) Services /additions costed by Attach costings or estimates Any other comments Installation budget or estimate $ (do not leave blank)
To work in collaboration with SAA workstream partners to build up a detailed knowledge of systems, policies and processes, translating that knowledge within the Exams, Awards and Graduation Team to ensure that the work is completed accurately and that quality standards are maintained 10 % To undertake detailed interpretation, manipulation and analysis/evaluation of data to contribute to the design of processes and systems, undertaking user acceptance testing as required. 10% To apply agreed customer-focused service standards to beneficiaries and stakeholders 15 % To be flexible and adaptable in the approach to work routines, undertaking other tasks, roles and duties within the SAA workstream as may be assigned 5% Internal and external relationships Active collaboration with Academic and MSA Staff in the Faculty with responsibility for Recruitment and Admissions. Active collaboration with teams within the SAA Hub and other Professional Services e.g. Communications, Student Services Communication with other job families, e.g TAE Communication with external stakeholders Casual staff and groups of temporary staff during peak periods Special Requirements Commitment to the integrity and confidentiality of all relevant data and processes Flexibility to take leave outside peak times in negotiation with the Senior Administrative Officer/Team Leader PERSON SPECIFICATION Criteria Essential Desirable How to be assessed Qualifications, knowledge and experience Either: Possess GCSE/O levels, NVQ2 or equivalent plus work experience in a relevant role. Or: Broad relevant work experience that includes experience of operating and responding to some non-routine work situations. Experience of assisting with the analysis and manipulation of student data or similar large data sets. Application
MONDAY -THURSDAY Time Show Presenters Editors / Producers Contact Details 0630 - 0700 Business Breakfast Vincent Wall Editor - Eric Moylan Producer - Nadine Maloney eric.moylan@newstalk.com nadine.maloney@newstalk.com 0700 - 0900 Newstalk Breakfast Paul Williams Shane Coleman Alan Quinlan Editor - Eric Moylan Producer - Nadine Maloney eric.moylan@newstalk.com 0900 - 1200 The Pat Kenny Show Pat Kenny Editor - Eimear Bradley Producer - Aisling aisling.moore@newstalk.com 1200 - 1400 Lunchtime Live Ciara Kelly Producer – Claire Darmody claire.darmody@newstalk.com 1400 - 1600 Moncrieff Sean Moncrieff Producer - Claire Collins claire.collins@newstalk.com 1600 - 1900 The Hard Shoulder with Ivan Yates Ivan Yates Editor - Mark Simpson Producer – Dan Flanagan mark.simpson@newstalk.com dan.flanagan@newstalk.com 1900 - 2200 Off The Ball Ger Gilroy Joe Molloy Kevin Kilbane Editor - Adrian Barry Producers - JP Gilbourne Nathan Murphy jp.gilbourne@offtheball.com nathan.murphy@offtheball.com 2200 - 2359 Tom Dunne Show Tom 0000 - 0630 The Best of Newstalk Various FRIDAY 0630 - 0700 Business Breakfast Vincent Wall Editor - Eric Moylan Producer - Nadine Maloney eric.moylan@newstalk.com nadine.maloney@newstalk.com 0700 - 0900 Newstalk Breakfast Paul Williams Shane Coleman Alan Quinlan Editor – Eric Moylan Nadine Maloney eric.moylan@newstalk.com 0900 - 1200 The Pat Kenny Show Pat Kenny Editor - Eimear Bradley Producer - Aisling Moore amoore@newstalk.com 1200 - 1400 Lunchtime Live Ciara Kelly Producer – Claire Darmody claire.darmody@newstalk.com 1400 - 1600 Moncrieff Sean Moncrieff Producer - Claire Collins claire.collins@newstalk.com
Environmental control Ventilation extraction / other specialist exhaust O2 depletion alarm gas alarms HEPA filtered air / other PC2 / biosafety cabinet or related Fume cupboard Safety interlocks (eg laser lab) Floor infrastructure Heavy equipment – floor loading issues Anti-vibration table / other large infrastructure IT IT cabling / new ports Other IT infrastructure General Other water supply (specify) Sink and/or handwash Safety shower and/or eyewash Compressed air Cardax reader, back to base alarm, other security or access control Other Specify Eg: other WHS measures? Other special services? Site compatibility issues check Equipment causes vibration, electrical or magnetic interference? Equipment is vibration sensitive, sensitive to electromagnetic interference? Other - specify? Specialist delivery costs not included in purchase contract Crane, specialist removals contractor, scaffolding, other ?
Youth Singers Uniform Order Form Please detach and return to the Cantabile office by September 28 to be sure to have your uniform by the first concert. The shipping costs for special orders are covered by the family. Cheques may be made payable to Cantabile Choirs. We are unable to process uniform orders by credit card. YOUNG WOMEN NAME: _____________________________________________________ PRICE Dress Size (please specify girls’ or ladies’) Size __________ $80.00 Polo Shirt (please specify ladies’ or men’s) Size __________ $25 Blue Polo Shirt $18.50 – available in stock in Ladies’ XS/S/M/L – additional sizes can be ordered. The shirts have a ‘fitted’ cut to them – some girls may prefer the more loosely fitted shirts in the men’s sizes of XS/S/M. Please indicate Ladies or Men’s. Necklace $15.00 TOTAL: __________________ (Cheque payable to Cantabile Choirs attached) YOUNG MEN NAME: _____________________________________________________ Pants Size __________ $25 (new) Dress shirts Size __________ (minimum of 2) $30 each Tie / Vest Size ____________ $45.00 Polo Men’s XS, S, M, L, XL Size _________ $25 TOTAL: __________________ (Cheque payable to Cantabile Choirs attached)