Heckman, J. J. (2005). The scientific model of causality. In Sociological Methodology 2005, Vol 35 (Vol. 35, pp. 1-97). Henry, A. D. (2009). The Challenge of Learning for Sustainability: A Prolegomenon to Theory. Human Ecology Review, 16(2), 131-140. Hirano, K., & Imbens, G. W. (2002). Estimation of Causal Effects using Propensity Score Weighting: An Application to Data on Right Heart Catheterization. Health Services & Outcomes Research Methodology, 2, 259-278. Hirano, K., Imbens, G. W., & Ridder, G. (2003). Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score. Econometrica, 71(4), 1161-1189. Hubacek, K., & van den Bergh, J. (2006). Changing concepts of 'land' in economic theory: From single to multi-disciplinary approaches. Ecological Economics, 56(1), 5-27. Hugo, G. (1998). The Demographic Underpinnings of Current and Future International Migration in Asia. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 7(1), 1-25. International Union for the Conservation of Nature. (1980). World Conservation Strategy. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for the Conservation of Nature. Jorgenson, A. K. (2006). Unequal ecological exchange and environmental degradation: A theoretical proposition and cross-national study of deforestation, 1990-2000. Rural Sociology, 71(4), 685-712. Jorgenson, A. K., Rice, J., & Clark, B. (2010). Cities, Slums, and Energy Consumption in Less Developed Countries, 1990 to 2005. Organization & Environment, 23(2), 189-204. Kates, R. W., Clark, W. C., Corell, R., Hall, J. M., Jaeger, C., Lowe, I., et al. (2001). Sustainability Science. Science, 292(5517), 641-642.
Koc, I., & Onan, I. (2004). International migrants' remittances and welfare status of the families in Turkey. International Migration Review, 38(1), 78-112. Korinek, K., Entwisle, B., & Jampaklay, A. (2005). Through thick and thin: Layers of social ties and urban settlement among Thai migrants. American Sociological Review, 70(5), Li, H. Z., & Zahniser, S. (2002). The determinants of temporary rural-to-urban migration in China. Urban Studies, 39(12), 2219-2235. Liang, Z. (2001). The age of migration in China. Population and Development Review, 27(3), 499-+. Lin, N. (2001). Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. New York: Cambridge University Press. Lin, N., Ensel, W. M., & Vaughn, J. C. (1981). Social Resources And Strength Of Ties - Structural Factors In Occupational-Status Attainment. American Sociological Review, 46(4), 393-403. Liu, J. G., & Diamond, J. (2005). China's environment in a globalizing world. Nature, 435(7046), 1179-1186. Liu, J. G., Dietz, T., Carpenter, S. R., Alberti, M., Folke, C., Moran, E., et al. (2007). Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science, 317(5844), 1513-1516. Liu, J. G., Linderman, M., Ouyang, Z. Y., An, L., Yang, J., & Zhang, H. M. (2001). Ecological degradation in protected areas: The case of Wolong Nature Reserve for giant pandas. Science, 292(5514), 98-101.
(n = 912) Table 2. Descriptive statistics of household level variables. Variables Mean (Standard deviation) Household Size (number of people in the household) 4.663 (1.288) Laborers (number of working age people—18~60 years of age—in the household) 2.651 (1.061) Senior (1 if there is senior member in the household; 0 if no senior member in the household) 0.326 (0.469) Non-migration Income (thousands of Yuan) 10.253 (7.887) Total Household Income (thousands of Yuan) 11.377 (9.376) Land (hectares) 0.282 (0.152) Pigs (number of pigs the household breed) 2.881 (2.159) Gengda (Gengda township = 1 and Wolong township = 0) 0.599 (0.491) Relative (1 if there is relative outside the reserve; 0 if no such relative) 0.517 (0.500) Relative Leader (1 if there is relative outside the reserve holding leadership position; 0 if no such relative) 0.215 (0.412) Friend (1 if there is friend outside the reserve; 0 if no such friend) 0.189 (0.392) Friend Leader (1 if there is friend outside the reserve holding leadership position; 0 if no such friend) 0.061 (0.240) Acquaintance (1 if there is acquaintance outside the reserve; 0 if no such acquaintance) 0.244 (0.430) Acquaintance Leader (1 if there is acquaintance outside the reserve holding leadership position; 0 if no such acquaintance) 0.055 (0.229) Tie (1 if there is any type of social tie outside the reserve; 0 if no tie outside the reserve) 0.663 (0.473) Tie Leader (1 if there is any type of social tie outside the reserve holding leadership position; 0 if no such tie) 0.302 (0.460) Migration (1 if there is labor migrant(s) in the household; 0 if no labor migrant(s) in the household) 0.375 (0.485) Fuelwood Consumption (kilograms) 6325 (4499) (n = 344)
(0.513) [2.034] Acquaintance 0.930*** (0.244) [2.535] 0.892*** (0.274) [2.440] Acquaintance Leader 0.307 (0.384) [1.359] Tie 0.795** (0.294) [2.214] Tie Leader 0.316 (0.268) [1.372] Intercept -8.003*** (1.959) -8.045*** (1.958) -7.848*** (1.991) -8.009*** (1.956) -8.126*** (2.014) AIC 589.247 599.763 600.832 588.033 587.629 Pseudo R2 0.319 0.304 0.303 0.319 0.319 *0.05; **0.01; ***0.001 (two-tailed tests). n = 912 ()