3D Derby Car Design Scoring Rubric Team:___________________________ Category Exemplary Proficient Partially Proficient Incomplete Points OVERALL SHAPE: The car design is complex, creative and realistic. 5 points The car design has multiple dimensions, many curves and looks very realistic. 3 points The car design has some dimension, some curves and is realistic. 1 point The car design is very boxy and basically a 2D outline pushed into 3D. 0 points The car design is simply a rectangular box with wheels. DETAILS: The car has many 3D details such as windows, lights, grills, vents, spoiler, exhaust pipes, fenders, trim… 5 points The car is very complex with 5 or more well designed details. 3 points The car is somewhat complex with 3 or more details. 1 point The car has at least 2 details. 0 points There are no details on the car at all. COLOR RENDERED MODEL: The digital model has colors for paint, windows, lights, wheels, rims, grills, undercarriage… 5 points The digital model is very realistic with 5 or more well chosen colors. 3 points The digital model has 3 or more well chosen colors. 1 point The digital model has just one color. 0 points The digital model is unpainted and just white. WHEEL DESIGN: The wheel design is complex, creative and realistic. 5 points The wheel design has multiple dimensions, detailed rims and looks very realistic. 3 points The wheel design is flat with simple rims and is realistic. 1 point The wheel design is flat with very little dimension. 0 points The wheel design is basically just a simple cylinder. Total Score _____ (20 max)
Battle Bot Design Document Scoring Rubric Team:___________________________ Category Exemplary Proficient Partially Proficient Incomplete Points RESEARCH: There are specific examples provided. 5 points 3 or more very relevant examples are provided. 3 points 2-3 relevant examples are provided. 1 point Only 1 somewhat relevant example is provided. 0 points There were no examples provided. Multiple reliable sources have been referenced or cited in the research. 5 points 3 or more very reliable sources have been referenced or cited in the research. 3 points 2 reliable sources have been referenced or cited in the research. 1 point Just 1 somewhat reliable source was referenced or cited in the research. 0 points There were no sources referenced or cited in the research. SPECIFICATIONS: The dimensions and components of the robot are clearly listed with multiple pictures. 5 points All dimensions/components are listed and there are 3 or more pictures of the robot. 3 points Dimensions/components are listed and there are 2 pictures. 1 point Missing dimensions or components and has just 1 picture. 0 points Missing dimensions and components and there are no pictures. PROGRAMMING: It is very clear how the programming makes the robot complete the tasks. 5 points It is very clear how the programming works. 3 points It is somewhat clear how the programming works. 1 point It is unclear how the programming works. 0 points There is no explanation of the programming at all. TESTING: There was significant testing to improve the speed, maneuverability, and attack of the robot. 5 points 5 or more modifications were very clearly described in the testing. 3 points 3 modifications were clearly described in the testing. 1 point Fewer than 3 modifications were somewhat described in the testing. 0 points There were no adjustments or modifications described in the testing. A clear and detailed data table was included to show results of the testing. 5 points The data table was very clear and easy to read with multiple entries and detailed results. 3 points The data table was clear with but lacked specific detail. 1 point The data table was confusing and lacked detail. 0 points There was no data table in the design document. Total Score _____ (30 max)
Block Bot Design Document Scoring Rubric Team:___________________________ Category Exemplary Proficient Partially Proficient Incomplete Points RESEARCH: There are specific examples provided. 5 points 3 or more very relevant examples are provided. 3 points 2-3 relevant examples are provided. 1 point Only 1 somewhat relevant example is provided. 0 points There were no examples provided. Multiple reliable sources have been referenced or cited in the research. 5 points 3 or more very reliable sources have been referenced or cited in the research. 3 points 2 reliable sources have been referenced or cited in the research. 1 point Just 1 somewhat reliable source was referenced or cited in the research. 0 points There were no sources referenced or cited in the research. SPECIFICATIONS: The dimensions and components of the robot are clearly listed with multiple pictures. 5 points All dimensions/components are listed and there are 3 or more pictures of the robot. 3 points Dimensions/components are listed and there are 2 pictures. 1 point Missing dimensions or components and has just 1 picture. 0 points Missing dimensions and components and there are no pictures. PROGRAMMING: It is very clear how the programming makes the robot complete the tasks. 5 points It is very clear how the programming works. 3 points It is somewhat clear how the programming works. 1 point It is unclear how the programming works. 0 points There is no explanation of the programming at all. TESTING: There was significant testing to improve the speed/accuracy of the robot. 5 points 5 or more modifications were very clearly described in the testing. 3 points 3 modifications were clearly described in the testing. 1 point Fewer than 3 modifications were somewhat described in the testing. 0 points There were no adjustments or modifications described in the testing. A clear and detailed data table was included to show results of the testing. 5 points The data table was very clear and easy to read with multiple entries and detailed results. 3 points The data table was clear with but lacked specific detail. 1 point The data table was confusing and lacked detail. 0 points There was no data table in the design document. Total Score _____ (30 max)
Line Follower Design Document Scoring Rubric Team:___________________________ Category Exemplary Proficient Partially Proficient Incomplete Points RESEARCH: There are specific examples provided. 5 points 3 or more very relevant examples are provided. 3 points 2-3 relevant examples are provided. 1 point Only 1 somewhat relevant example is provided. 0 points There were no examples provided. Multiple reliable sources have been referenced or cited in the research. 5 points 3 or more very reliable sources have been referenced or cited in the research. 3 points 2 reliable sources have been referenced or cited in the research. 1 point Just 1 somewhat reliable source was referenced or cited in the research. 0 points There were no sources referenced or cited in the research. SPECIFICATIONS: The dimensions and components of the robot are clearly listed with multiple pictures. 5 points All dimensions/components are listed and there are 3 or more pictures of the robot. 3 points Dimensions/components are listed and there are 2 pictures. 1 point Missing dimensions or components and has just 1 picture. 0 points Missing dimensions and components and there are no pictures. PROGRAMMING: It is very clear how the programming makes the robot complete the tasks. 5 points It is very clear how the programming works. 3 points It is somewhat clear how the programming works. 1 point It is unclear how the programming works. 0 points There is no explanation of the programming at all. TESTING: There was significant testing to improve the speed/accuracy of the robot. 5 points 5 or more modifications were very clearly described in the testing. 3 points 3 modifications were clearly described in the testing. 1 point Fewer than 3 modifications were somewhat described in the testing. 0 points There were no adjustments or modifications described in the testing. A clear and detailed data table was included to show results of the testing. 5 points The data table was very clear and easy to read with multiple entries and detailed results. 3 points The data table was clear with but lacked specific detail. 1 point The data table was confusing and lacked detail. 0 points There was no data table in the design document. Total Score _____ (30 max)
Robo Rally Design Document Scoring Rubric Team:___________________________ Category Exemplary Proficient Partially Proficient Incomplete Points RESEARCH: There are specific examples provided. 5 points 3 or more very relevant examples are provided. 3 points 2-3 relevant examples are provided. 1 point Only 1 somewhat relevant example is provided. 0 points There were no examples provided. Multiple reliable sources have been referenced or cited in the research. 5 points 3 or more very reliable sources have been referenced or cited in the research. 3 points 2 reliable sources have been referenced or cited in the research. 1 point Just 1 somewhat reliable source was referenced or cited in the research. 0 points There were no sources referenced or cited in the research. SPECIFICATIONS: The dimensions and components of the robot are clearly listed with multiple pictures. 5 points All dimensions/components are listed and there are 3 or more pictures of the robot. 3 points Dimensions/components are listed and there are 2 pictures. 1 point Missing dimensions or components and has just 1 picture. 0 points Missing dimensions and components and there are no pictures. PROGRAMMING: It is very clear how the programming makes the robot complete the tasks. 5 points It is very clear how the programming works. 3 points It is somewhat clear how the programming works. 1 point It is unclear how the programming works. 0 points There is no explanation of the programming at all. TESTING: There was significant testing to improve the speed/accuracy of the robot. 5 points 5 or more modifications were very clearly described in the testing. 3 points 3 modifications were clearly described in the testing. 1 point Fewer than 3 modifications were somewhat described in the testing. 0 points There were no adjustments or modifications described in the testing. A clear and detailed data table was included to show results of the testing. 5 points The data table was very clear and easy to read with multiple entries and detailed results. 3 points The data table was clear with but lacked specific detail. 1 point The data table was confusing and lacked detail. 0 points There was no data table in the design document. Total Score _____ (30 max)