Funding model: funding sources for existing services solid, clearly explained, detailed long term sustainability for existing services existing costs secured or strong strategy to secure the missing part, clear vision of the future information on services under implementation possibility of hosting institution/country funding, Eu or national projects in preparation information on envisioned services ideas of the funding possibilities and opportunities Expectations regarding EPOS Flexible fund: understanding of the kind of activities that EPOS may fund, understanding that EPOS is not a funding agency, activities identified are in line with EPOS vision Organization & Governance Internal coherence: Is the governance (WG structured in TCS, pillars, nodes, services) coherent among all WGs? Shared Governance Model: Is the declared governance shared among the community behind the WG? Table 2. General: Summary of the WT TCS Evaluation Working Group 1 Seis 2 Volc 3 Geol 4 Geod 5a OBS 5b NF 6 Labs 8 Sat 9 Mag 10 IndS Technical Operability Are the data declared currently available to users through any form of online access? Yes (at least a subset) / Available though other TCS / No Nothing yet existing Nothing yet existing EIDA Nothing yet existing Nothing yet existing Does the TCS retain an (website)? Yes (at least for 1 service) / No Multiple (will be part of EPOS) OneGeo (outside EPOS) EUref HelNeb (outside EPOS) Multiple, (outside EPOS) Does the e-infrastructure work? (testing only by browsing website) Yes (at least for 1 service) / No Limitation of the e-infrastructure? In all cases, e-infrastructure only partially covers planned services No obvious limitations/ minor limitations / severe limitations / not existing Limited across services not fully tested as not a domain specialist No coordinated access across datacenters, limited data access Should WG build own tools or instead use other WG?s Should WG build own tools or instead use other WG?s not a single Requires update for EPOS Interoperability level infrastructure
Does the TCS use standard for data and metadata? Yes, good examples exist/ standards exist and will be adopted / standards need to be created or no plans to use standards imminent Will adopt Will adopt Needs to create Will adopt No real plan to integrate with other WG Does the TCS have web services? Yes (at least for 1 service) / in development, or can use services in other WGs/ No imminent existing in WG1/3 existing in WG1/3 existing in As above Does the TCS adopt a data policy and AAAI? Yes, EPOS policy / Not clear / Not existing or very restrictive emerging v. restricted Access to high-level data products Does the TCS have a plan to deliver high-level (in the data taxonomy) data products? Yes, some high level products are planned 0-3 0-3 0-3 1-3 0-3 0-3 0-3 0-3 Working Group 1 Seis 2 Volc 3 Geol 4 Geod 5a OBS 5b NF 6 Labs 8 Sat 9 Mag 10 IndS Data Policy Adopted data policy Is the TCS adopting a data policy? (Note overlap with question above) Yes, a policy is discussed / Not clear if policy is consistent with EPOS open access/ restricted/ embargoed open access/ restricted/ Not clear if OneGeol. compatible with EPOS EDGI open access/ embargoed restricted/ embargoed open access/ embargoed open access/ restricted/ to be specified open access/ INSPIRE open access/ restricted/ Which user and data categories are the TCS adopting? TCS plans variety of services, and references EPOS data and user policies / Not clear if policy is consistent with EPOS data producer, academia data producer/ academia/ government Not clear if OneGeol. compatible with EPOS data producer/ academia/ government data producer data producer/ academia/ data producer/ academia/ government data producer/ academia/ government data producer/ academia/ industry Existing access rules Does the TCS already implement open access rules consistent with EPOS for existing services registered/ authorized registered/ authorized GEO Not clear if OneGeol. compatible with EPOS registered authorized registered/ authorized Possibly inconsistent with EIDA registered Possibly with EPOS registered registered/ authorized
Yes / Not clear / No existing services to be checked IPR awareness Is the TCS taking into account IPR? Yes, IPR is clearly taken into account / Not clear / No information citation needed planning to use EPOS IPR rules DOI planning to use EPOS IPR rules Working Group 1 Seis 2 Volc 3 Geol 4 Geod 5a OBS 5b NF 6 Labs 8 Sat 9 Mag 10 IndS Financial Summary of the cost assessment solid, detailed, clear separation between existing / new costs Clear plan / no existing services or new services proposed / Problems / financial info not available No financial info No financial info Financial Plan under revision No existing services Seems to build services already existing in other WGs No existing services No financial info Clear plan but some services already exist in other WGs Funding model funding sources for ex. services solid, clearly explained, detailed Clear plan / plan exists but issues / Problems / info not available or no existing services High expenses not justified No financial info No financial info Financial Plan under revision No existing services No existing services No existing services No financial info Not clear how existing services integrate into EPOS; No existing services long term sustainability for existing services existing costs secured or strong strategy to secure the missing part, clear vision of the future Clear plan / plan exists but issues / Problems / info not available or no existing services Major shortfall imminent @ EMSC. Other services (AHEAD, Orfeus, ESM, EFEHR) rely on continuing support at 1 institution No financial info No financial info Financial Plan under revision No existing services No existing services No existing services No financial info Nations keep support 5but not clear for the additional costs to adapt to EPOS) No existing services
Existing access rules - IPR awareness DATA DATA TYPE DATA POLICY ACCESS RULES 0 Waveforms Waveforms. Open data for some comprehensive cases and data restricted for the others Online/Offline data access 0 Station and sensor information Information about the sensors (seismic, gravity, strain, pressure etc.). Open data policy. Offline data 0 Production data Information about exploitation (well head pressures, injection rates, amount of ore exploited). Both, Open and Restricted data policy. Offline data access 0 Geometry data Various information about geometry (well traces, engineering structures, panels exploited, fault traces). Both, Open and Restricted data policy. Offline data access 0 Auxillary parametric data Other 0D-4D information tied to the specific RI (such as 3d velocity models, gravity anomaly maps, profiles, cross-sections, sample data, fissures, geological data, samples, repeated measurements of various physical parameters etc.) Open data policy. Offline data access 1 Basic catalog Basic seismic data (time, location, magnitude). Open data policy. Online/Offline data access 1 Extended catalog Extended information (fault plane solutions, moment tensors, detailed source parameters, PGV etc.). Open data policy. Offline data access 2 Extended data on seismic sources Highly processes seismic data (rupture directivity, source tomography, relocated catalogs, velocity models). Open data policy. Offline data access 2 Processed data Processed auxiliary data (e.g. geomechanical parameters) Offline data access 3 Highly VariousPPPProcessed 0D-4D data Seismic hazard maps (2D), high fidelity velocity models. Open data policy. Offline data access 3 Software Software designed for mining-induced seismicity. Open data policy. Offline data access 3 Reports Open access reports resulting from analysis of induced seismicity. Open data policy. Offline data access Financial Summary of the cost assessment NAME 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 PILLARS UNDER IMPLEMENTATION Acquisition of Induced Seismicity Episodes 3 394 400 1 572 200 1 547 400 1 135 900 1 255 300 InSilico experiments including seismic hazards 1 250 000 510 000 500 400 360 000 356 000