6 knCM throu:;Jh and through, he has to be aware of and feel its spiritua1 aspirations. There are sane days, sane periods or rocments, when the sembly needs to sin], or to speak, or to remain silent. We should sin], of cxrurse, and sin] well -so lcn,J as the quality of our singin;:J is the sign of truth, so lon:J as we place our talent and our heart in the service of prayer in cxnm:>n. But before all else, we have to sing "in spirit and in truth" • Trans Zation, Gethsemani Abbey Jean LEB:N
7 THE CELEBRATION OF SEXT IN THE REFECTORY A REPORT ON THE BRICQUEBEC GENESIS For sare t:ine past there were already sane rranbers of the c::amnmity keenly aware of the ananaly and overloaded nature of the SUnday succession of Terce - High Mass - Sext - grace before meals - dinner - grace after meals.This led us to SU]gest to the camnmity, little by little, that, thanks to the possibilities afforded us by the loi-cadre, there was amther i;x:>ssible and doubtless nore desirable way of doing things. As the first stage, we detached Terce fran this ensanble so as to vide for its recitation in groups. This experience of an Office celebrated outside its usual settirg gave us an initial preparation enabling us to cept still further evolutions. There was another factor which likewise intervened. Towards the ning of 1970, the celebration of the Little !burs beJan to integrate elanents of prayer more specifically attached to the period of the day or the tie which. ,f()I]'OO:d the :hlJrJediate oontext of the celebration. In this way the prayer of Sext quite naturally evoked the work which had :imrediately preceded, as well as the ireaJ. which. d Oa;in in just a few-minutes • • •we were not long iJl teeling, er, tha,t ext follCMed by the meal w,lth its prayers fore and af ter, fOJ::IOOd a sanewhat re;retable doublet. Mention was several times made of the possibility of a celebration in the refectocy;'·but this pro-
did not result in an inmediate cx:mmmity consensus. However, we were not very satisfied with our refectory prayers. A nunber of us found than too ponderous, too f ixed. With a view to providing an answer to the desire for an arrelioratal version, tb::>se in charge of the liturgy shaped up a project. TlDugh this 'Benedicite" was maintained as an autanaoous it see:ned to than that, in spite of everything, it ought oot to be reduced to too nod.est proportions. When this project becane the subject of cism, the request was once nore ma.de that Sext and the refectory prayers be joined in a single fOllllUlacy.
8 As a parallel devel.opnent to this liturgical evolution, the ing and ref umishinJ of the storeys .inmediately above the refectory led us to realize to the full the importance of this place \\here the ccmnunity gathers several ti.mas daily far an "exercise" to which the I:bly Rule attaciles so much importance, as we well kncM • • •Vbat had before been only a big tangular rocm painted white and witmut character, acquired, through means involving a minimum of expense, a wann, pleasant atnK:>sphere. We retained the decorative brick pa.vement, mich is quite interesting; but we stri and sanded down the walls so that the original stones DCM appear -an trenely pleasing ef fect. Between the large concrete beams which support the upper storey we suspended a f alse-ceiling made of slats separated by spa.ces s'blf f ed with absorba.nt material. The visual ef fect is good, and the tical result is excellent. This point deserves to be noted, because the visual and acoustical enviromient thus created was an tant f actor which facilitated our experll'nent. The arran;Jaoont of the tables also had its inq;x:>rtance. A vestige of the traditional arran;Jaoont was retained, though the tables were placed on either side of the reader 's p.llpit (situated between 0...0 central windc:Ms opening onto the nonastery court ) , and the Superiors' table was placed in such' a wey that it f aces the reader. This leaves a rather inp:>rtant area free in the middle of the refectory; this spa.ce, which is well lighted, has its area delimited nore or less by the arrangement of the tables, and it foIIllS at one and the. sane time both the center of the refectory and an ideal place far the cx:mnunity to gather. Vestil;ul-e Reader C;ross ,. Of f iae _ ,,I .I _ , ···' ex-
10 A slx>rt period of silence foll<:Med by a short responsory ch:>sen at the discretion of the cantor in function of the reading or of the Hour. A prayer said by the Hebdanadary , the there of which bears on the Hour and the meal which is to follow. Then a short litany in which we generally find the following elements: an introduction which includes a nention of Our Lady's intercession; three intentions:the first one is often general; the ranai.ning two concern our absent brethren and the departed. This is fm:mulated. in such a way that acxx>lmt is taken of the Hour, of the meal, and occasional y even of the reading. For instance: We c:xnmand ourselves to the intercession of the Blessed Virgin Mary, M:>ther of God, and we pray to you, O lord: For those Y.dlo hunger and thirst for justice. R. lord, have marcy. For our brothers detained by their work. R. lord••• For those who have cxxnpleted their task here below. R. lord... ' Then the Supeior introduces the recitation in cx::moon of the lord's Prayer, and for this he uses the non-variable nnnition assigned to the tle Hours: "And DCM let us all pray the lord's f>rayer together." Imrediately after the lord's Prayer, the superior says a blessin:J of the following kind: "May the everlasting King of glory grant us a place at his table in his Kingdon. R. Atren. " Each of the brethren goes to his place for the meal . Ranarks The Place Sane brethren might experience a bit of difficulty at the idea of celebrating an Office in the refectory; but the surprise would doubtless be occasioned nnre by the simple fact of a cba.n:Je in practice, rather than by a really deep reason. The notion of the dignity of the place which could
The Celebration of Sext in the Refectory 13 The earth has yielded it fruit, for God, our God, has blessed us. Nevertheless, we envisage the progressive enrichment of this psalm:rly, and a variety in the choice of the psaJms acx:x>rding to the day. s. The Prayer The fo.xroulas we use sean suitable enough, but we need a a still greater variety.2 One cannot ask the daries always to be ;Q:rp.:rov;i.sing, and this is doubtless not even desirable. But a greater range of choice would make possible a better adaptation to the oonc:rete cirCL1TIStances, and would render easier the minor glosses or cations of the text such as oould effectively make these prayers really meaningful for everyone••• It would be good to have in this repertory of follllUlas a careful ance betlYeen universal or general intentions(we ought oot to forget that the prayer we should be expl"essing is the prayer of the Church)and those requests which oonc:Eml m:>xe particularly the ccmmmity (we ought not to be any less mindful of the fact that the prayer which roust be put into words ls·· the prayer of this particular group of brethren living hie et nunc in these particular cirCL1TIStances). 6. The Litany The preceding rana.rk is oo less true far the litany. It will already have been remarked how the arrangement of the intentions Satisfies this exigency. But we want to a:nphasize that the proposed structure is oo more than a bare canvas needing to be filled in••• It should be noted that the introduction to this litany includes a mention of Our Lady:one possible solution -one annng others -of the problem of "Marian antiphons". What we want is to ensure the presence of Our Lady at the very heart of the Office, and not in sarething tacked on at the end, or at the beginning as a kind of preamble. Her presence within our Office should be at one and the sane time
16 lord, with your word you nourished Mary of Bet:hapy who listened at your feet, and you received the devotion · of Martha who served you. Through this meal we are about to take in your presence, ma,ke us more attentive to your \\Ord , nore ready and willing in the service of our brethren, today and ;for all eternity. 3 We are not aware of undue exaggeration in about the :importance of this elarent in our celebration, brief though it be. It is a fact of experience that this quite simple appeal for·the prayer of OUr Lady, foll.CMed by one of the titles dear to Olristian (and Cistercian) tion, makes it possible to express with real depth and in a very hunan, realistic manner, the intensity of our Marian devotion. To the extent that one can attarpt to explain this pherr.menon at the level of literary technique, it seans that it is precisely the bility of havin;J a variable foDnUla which is m:>st effective. The ruption" of sarething unexpected within a fixed, pre-detennined setting or structure, but where this "sarething unexpected" is not an elsrent of surprise, fosters attention and ensures that the word spoken and ceived is marked with truth and authenticity.In this context, there is ro longer a question of quantity. As we remc::irked with regard to the prayer, the same holds true for every ' discreet, appropriate gloss or m:>dification of familiar faonulas - provided that the ccmnunity is prepared for this. re-
the cx:mnunity as a whole -even though the levels of cipation may differ -and within the ccmnunity in the setting of its day to day existence. The first advantage of havin:1 such rshops within one's CMil m:mas - let's be realistic -is financial:the cost of such a session roughly quals the expense incurred by four or five members going to another ty for a similar session. e-
A Ci-.rCJU Za:r Lette:r from the President of OuP LituP(Jy Commission 31 "ad experinentun'' by the Sa.c;red Congrega.tion -o;i;; rather, the Consilium - in the indult Of Decenber 15, 1967, Pr.n.3394/67.} Hav1rY:1 sa.id all the above , if the line of action prqx:>sErl by ran hard. Kleiner seens better calculated to obtain the possibility of having our particular situation, our sound :m:>nastic traditions, and our neErl for "ell:x:w roan'' respected,Ipersonally am not opi;x::>sErl; quite the opposite (though I don t want to hide that f act that our refU]e behW a so-callErl ''Cistercian Rite" involves sore slight measure of artif ice) • And it ranains for me only to excuse the length of this circular letter, and to assure you of my best wishes In the !Drd, f . Geratd .Dulx:>is (signed) President of the LitQJ;gy ccmnissj.on ..
Meeting of the Boa:l'd of Direators of the FDLC 41 I do hope that the day will a:ire when we will be able to share directly in the positive work being done by the FDIC. Anthony DELISI Al:bey of the Spirit
text with greater clarity (music of the sort used for stylized recitations)? - we have already accepted the principle of liberty of choice.But are we always oonscious of the results of the various choices which we make? If we have adopted this rather than sare other follll or literary genre, are we likewise gane to sul:mitting to the nollllS inl?Qserl by the lar choice we have made? .... What should be our exigencies with regard to authol:'s and ccrcposers? Is it not nonnal that they, rather than the performers, be the ones who must face up to the difficulties which must be solved if the
48 liturgical carq;X>Sition is to function adequately? In this way the different ai;proaches led us, by listening to one another, to dig deeper into the initial question, and give it a broader dimension.A first conclusion aoorged with great clarity: The impo;r>tcmt thing is not to sta:l't with a priori ideas, and on the basis of ready-made definitions whiah might weii be too striative. Rather, we first ha:ve to aaaept the faat that, within the gZobaZ deveZopment of a Ziturgiaai aeZebration, one and the same attitude (e.g., the "response" to a reading) acm be trcmsZated or expressed in quite different forms (siZenae, responsary or simpZe response, tropaPion, psaZm , hyrrrn, eta...); having aaaepted this aipZe, we then ha:ve to refZeat on the funation proper to this Zar aat in this or that paPtiauZaP aontext. This provided us with our w o r k - rn e t h o d -rather along the lines of sarething "non-directive". This sort of approach certainly gives one less security than might be found in a series of magisterial exi;:ose's; and, no doubt about it, it is saoothing quite hesitant, uncertain; but it also calls far a greater personal involvenen.t if the satisfactory anS\\ler is to be found.This kind of approach is the direct fruit of experience, and it represents, as is obvious, only a preliminary attempt at reflection -an initial, sketchy tion which has to be further developed in the closest cormection with the real life of the celebrating a:mnunities. II The second day was ext.rerrely rich in insights received fran one another, and we were able to group together a certain nurrber of important or interesting elenents. There were 'b.o approaches which kept constantly crisscrossing: - The first was more concerned with the objective perfo:rmance of certain follIIS of liturgical music:responsaries or responses, troparia, prayers,various Mass chants•••
Cisteraian Francophone Commission 51 person and at the level of the entire oonmunity. (For instance, the tution of "we" far ''I' in the refrain, or other similar, slight nodifications of the biblical texts make it possible to effect a better application of the neaning to the situation of the asserrbly.) Not every literary genre lends itself equally well to the exigencies of a dete:a:nined liturgical fonn. A narrative text, for exanple, is unsuitable, as a general rule, for the literary fonn of a responsory. If, then, in this or that particular set of cirC1.m1.Stances, a narrative text seans suitable as an adequate rrode of response, we should find SOitE fonn other than that of the reSIX>Jlsory in order to utilize this narrative text as a response to the reading . At Belval, as at En-Calcat, the purpose of a doxology at the end of a responsory was called into question. Except for rare cases in which the sponsories thanselves are wholly daxological, the correct link. between the doxology and the reprise is oten hazardous, sanetimes even outrageously cal. Objection was also made to the practice of dividing the responsory (as distinct fran the verset) into two parts, with the reprise limited to the second part. This imposes yet another constraint on the carp::>ser, and offers the executants no real advantage. During the whole course of this study, the preoccupation was not that of finding ready-made solutions or sure-fire fonnulas; rather, it was a question of our becaning aware of the exigencies imposed with regard to this or that particular 1iturgical fonn -exigencies which have to be well understcx:x:i in any serious effort at adaptation and creation. And are not our options tary to the particular way in which we think. of the ccmmmity and the role the cx:mmmity has to play in the course of the liturgical action? It appeared that there was a unaninous aspiration in the direction of greater spontaneity and less rigidity in the use and perfonnance of cal pieces. Paradoxically,
52 ty could already be exercised at the level of simply choosing which elanents one wishes to arploy. There is likewise a scope for creativity in the choice of the perfarners or "actors'': we all know that the sane text read by ferent readers produces different effects, depending on the reader. As gards listening to the "WOrd of God and the camrunity response which should be given to this reading, we asked whether we ought to go still further, and visage new fo:onulas nearer real life. Here and there exper.inents have already been made with such texts.It "WOuld be a question of preparing for the reading precisely as a ccmnunity; of listening to this reading together, so as to arrive at a real sharing of the liturgy; and of enabling each irrlividual to express before one's brothers or sisters what the Word and Spirit might have awakened within one's deepest self. This formula for listening to the 'WOrd of God is the daily bread of small apostolic groups, and especially of yO\.mgste.rs. uld it not be a gocx1 thing to introduce this approach into our nonastic nnmities, .in function of our possibilities, our needs, and our resources? At any rate, we cannot afford to refuse the evidence: the way in which we approach the Scriptures today is different from what it was in the past -not ly different, of course, but different at the level of culture; and this cannot fail to affect to sane degree the style of our response. b- T h e T r o p a r i o n Not much will be said about the troparion in this report, since a detailed study by Fr.Jean-Eudes David of Briwill probably appear in the next issue of this Liturgy bulletin.In this article the Autlx:>r will study the literary fonn of the troparion, particularly under the aspect of play :situation of the various actors or perfonrers, diversification of roles, articulation of the mants of dialogue, conditions requisite for authenticity. Here we shall stress only the fact that, in spite of the
evident differences between a troparion and a responsory, there are analogies cxmron to the two foIJllS, particularly as regards the link between the elerrents of dialogue and the need for consistency and logic in the texts assigned the persons woo have roles to play in the perfonnance of these liturgical fonns. c... T h e L i t a n y - p r a y e r As before, our reflection about this liturgical foxm went bly beyond the mere teclmical aspects. We began with a discussion about the diversification of the roles played by the participants:the role of the autl:Dr
54 to a oonsiderable extent. However, it is the celebrant who is sponsilile for gathering together and surrming up and, perhaps, even placing these petitions in their proper oontext. Sane of the structures currently in use in our camrunities provide for an ductory nonition .imrediately before the IDrd's Prayer, but also diately after a series of spontaneous petitions.A nonition at this spot is ideal for unifying the preceding petitions. This insertion of ''real life" in our celebrations is an important point to which we shall return. If the litany-prayer in the strict sense is to serve its ftmction, there are several conditions which have to be net: There should be a certain harrogeneity between the various intentions, an overall rll.ythm for the enserrble. The response by the comm.mity should be adapted to the intentions.A doxological acclamation ought not to be stmg after a petition for giveness or sarething similar.This response should be simple and "open", that is to say, suitable to serve as a link between particular tions and general intentions. Here again, it would be a good thing to have a certain variety as regards the fonn of the litany-prayer. The r e s p o n s o r i a l p s a l m and the A l l e l u i a V e r s e It seems to be clear that at Mass, especially when there are only t:v.o ings, the response to the first reading can vary: silence, responsorial psalm, alleluia-psalm••• Should a r e s p o n s o r i a 1 p s a 1 m be used, we are ( evidently faced with the same problem of having a ooherent 1IR1Sical and textual link tween the refrain and what the psalmist sings -a problem already discussed with regard to the responsories. It should be noted, as was already done at the
neeting, that "a certain critical eye with regard to the choice of refrains proposed by the (official) lectionaries is not to be excluded, since not everything is what it should be in these books." An.other question was asked:Is the responsorial psalm a "neditation· song" or a reading? The several historical facts which were briefly recalled author-
66 effort, on the part of entire camrunities as well as on the part of those in charge of various areas of concem.M:>reover, there is also a need for real canpetence•••But if our ccmnunities and those in charge of the liturgy are going to have a solid liturgical fonnation, we have to :be willing to pay the price. As regards the fo:rmation of specialists, it is a matter of regret that so few nonks and nuns of our Order are sent to the liturgy institutes in Paris and in Rane.we have only one student specializing in liturgy at the present tine. T e x t s Fr.Jean-Eudes gave a progress report of the work being done. This work is proceeding at a good pace. Since a rather detailed presentation of the ious projects was recently given in the August, 1971 issue of the French version of this Bulletin, pp. (9)-(14), there was no reason to go into further details at our Belval meeting.Here we shall only note that a neeting of the Sub-c6mnission for Texts took place immediately before the plenary session which net at Belval. There were two and a-half days of work, and the neeting proved to be a ful one. Everyone knows what a great need we have for new texts of high quality. The work done by the Cistercian Francophone Coomission is generally much ciated both within the Order and elsewhere; and the Sub-carrmission is encour- ages to continue its serious work in this area. M u s i c or C h a n t Sub-camnission Fr.Clement de Boumont in his tum gave a report on the work done by his Sub-com- mission: Activities of the t year (since the last neeting of the Cistercian Francophone Corrmission}: In cooperation with the group 'Chant et lt>nasteres11 , which has expanded so as to beoorre an inter-Order organisn, a nunber of sessions were organized: A workshop for cc:rrp:>sers, under the direction of Victor Martin: a 2-week session held last January and February at
68 These sessions helped · ;i.nd.ividuals to disoover not only the laws of oorrect singing (voice culture}, but also the deep roots :mus;tc has, and the cussions it affects throughout out entire human organism, both physical and spiritual. So the idea emerged of organizing six-day sessions within various camrunities. In this way the individual commmity could profit even rrore tensively than is possible when only one or two members take part in a general session held elsewhere. Within the Order and withJut, sessions have been held or will be held: at Les Gardes , November 1970 (beginners) and 1971 (advanced); at the Poor Clares of Nantes, January 1971 and June 1972; at the CctnTelites of Avranches, June 1971 and June or July 1972; at the Benedictine nuns of Liege, August 1971; at the Canrelites of Arras, late October 1971; advanced oourse in 1972; - Jbm.inican nuns of Taulignan (the session will take place at Marseille), November 1971; at the Religieuses de La Pcmneraye (Maine-et-Ioire), Decerrber 1971; at the Canrelites of Liesse (Aisne), January 1972; at T.imadeuc, May 1972. Though outsiders can, of oourse, be invited, the number of participants in such sessions ought not to exceed 25. The physical chlture sessions of Madane Peerboan : The importance of this work was particularly noted by the tID Francophone secrataries '(Europe) for the various questions touching on rronastic fonnation. This discipline is the fruit of a ooncem to discover as deeply as possi... ble to roots of expression -of which chant is only a single particular aspect . This study of the domain of the bodily and peysical has proved to be of d.a:rrental importance at the level of the rronk 's general fonnation. Acoordingly, it is the Secretariate for Fonnation which is officially in charge of this area of training within the Order -though always in union with others ly charged in the other rronastic Orders.
The Music and Chant SUb-carmri.ssion can only rejoice to see this area of study exploited as a result of the enoouragerrent it had given the initiatives of the group ''Chant et Jvbnasteres" sare tine ago. The next ;issue of the bulle-
72 r r r p I f - J&: t ; ' I f_ n the . horn ac-claim the King, the Lord. 3- Let the sea and all C F , ;. riv-ers clap their Frw.ip J fl p. J J l hands and the hills ring out their joy 1 1 I i J r. r J at the pres-ence of the Lord: Cf. od: for he comes, he comes to rule t I ! J the earth. He will rule the world with jus-tice and the )'. I f r I peo-ples with fair-ness. A N T I P H 0 N S ANTIPHON 1 c A..b:! 3 _ c;.1 ij I . !! l j h ' '} I "' . I J . . I
Three Royal Psalms with Antiphons 73 ANTIPHON 3 r The Lord has made known his sah to the na-tions. ANTIPHON 4 t °f J J J J t J · l His is to the ends of the ANTIPHON 5 I 4 A• ; 1I :p IJc_ I h J J j The Lord comes to rule the earth with jus-tice. ANTIPHON 6 (Jj t r 1 'J ] IFj t f J J 0 I Sing to the Lord a new song, for he has done mar- deeds. ANTIPHON 7 m E'\I t=' J p r F l I J J - I =:;_ 1.I J_ II Great and wonder,ful are all your works, Lord, mighty God! ANTI PHON 8 P.r.IQ e ij\ I t-:3 ®
74 1- The Lord is king, (7 h,, Jz<)"J I PSALM 96 r r J J I let earth joice, let all the I 3 J t J J I J coast-lands be Cloud and dark-ness are his F G-m, I-· r I c2 r his jus-tice and right . A fire pares his path; it burns up his foes on every side. Cc, [? 1' A V"! ij If J J J I V J r I "'2tr the ; earth trem-bles at the sight . 2- The moun-tains melt Q fy J J I u J_( (E" ( F e i . J I I The skies claim his jus-tice; all peo-ples c., F GM1 J I l J - 1 r r J "' I r r r · I see his glo-ry. Let those who serve i-dols be a-
J) 1 J'" f 1 z 1 '.;"' ;Jdr J 1 Fj2 11 shamed. those who boast of their woi"{h-less . gods. f All . you spi.t::·dts, wor- ship him.
Three Royai Psaims with AntiphQns 75 i= c,....,, c, l= G- n,, Gi - f t2 I- r r I , pl I I:..i 3 -- 3- Zi-on hears and is glad; the peo-ple of Ju-dah c., I I b I Ari l iI I @ JJI - J OlCe be-cause of your 0 Lord. E Gr!!] 1 c., e @ I 1 r r ft? I ' For you deed are the high a-hove F earth, I= hove all C.J I r r "'J I 0 i r r r I J J "J.. I its. 4- The Lord loves those who hate e vil; he tt) I * 13 I 1- J J IV Lt I 0 I J J I J J - I f J " I r r from the F ments,
76 ANTlPHON 2 &i B o F #= F ? j J ,I I J j r It F EJ t r r The Lord is king, the most high al l the earth . ANTIPHON. 3 @t:..1 J J I r r (?.q i]r J I :I Al l you spi r-i ts, wor - ship him ! if - ;I Q I F r r I J ; J 0 II .Be gl ad, l you up-ri ght of heart ! ANTIPHON 5 ij4 n J I + I h 4 I - J I t II t!>.,;: c.1 Great are your judg .,, 0 Lord! ANTIPHON 6 W\., . c.., r:: J 2> I 7 The Lord i s a l ight for the just . C4: ij ., 3f I I- 2 jt t I II Al - l e - l u- i a, Al - l e - l u - ia. N
Three Royal Psalms with Antiphons 77 PSALM 95 1- 0 sing a new song to the Lord, sing to the Lord, all the l1 earth. 007 sin.g to the Lord, bl ss his name ., Pro claim his help ¥ r 1 l= J J J 1 I r 1 c;. d.,,, , J l=J H Ai I J' . ft f ._ t - n I $J J Pb I r- 2 > I J J l praise, . to be feared a- bove all gods; the gods of the ' c,..., I\ ., D D J J J " T- f J ) j . heath-ens are naught . (;. n I J - f J 1 It was the Lord who made the E :e l f J J J J J J I t his are maj-es-ty and state and pow-er and splen-dor in
h:i5 j ; J * 1 Ifu r c, , t ; J J J I t ;r·I a ho- ly place. J- Give the Lord, you fam-i-lies of f m? J J t::t:r I ? J EdOq ?J J IAt-. l J 1give the Lord glo-ry and pow-er, give the Lord the glo-ry A-1 L t n I J 1 J J j ; of his name . Bring an off-'ring and en-ter his courts, wor-ship f r I J 1J fl>1f n J J J I Ji j r I the Lord in his tem-ple. 0 earth, trem-ble fore hlln .
78 0 0 P I ; ) l J J l - i l l 1 4-Pro- claim to the na-tions: 'God is King. ' The world he made Er-,, E , A, GrM Ai ) firm in its place; he will judge the peo-ples in Let the bears joice, all the trees of the wood shout for joy A97 A , ®t n =l - t ;1 £ J 1 I J . t- r ; J J J J l 1 5 j J J Fl rule the earth . With jus-tice he will e the world, he will J J J J -; I - f II the peo-ples with his truth. ANTIPHON l A N T I P H 0 N S A 1 I J - J .k J To- day is born our Christ the Lord . >