zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
To: [FACULTY NAME AND TITLE] From: [SUPERVISOR NAME AND TITLE] Date: _/_/_ Re: Performance Improvement Plan This is to advise you that you have failed to meet your performance expectations in the areas described below and are therefore being placed on a performance improvement plan (PIP). The intent of this plan is to help you develop the knowledge, skills, and abilities necessary to perform your duties at a satisfactory level. While this plan is non-disciplinary, failure to meet the goals stated in the plan may be grounds for disciplinary action up to and including termination. Duration: This PIP will be in effect for [AMOUNT OF TIME] from [DATE]. During the course of the PIP, I will meet with you on a [WEEKLY/BI-WEEKLY/MONTHLY] basis to discuss your progress on the goals in the PIP. Those meetings will be held in [OFFICE] at [TIME AND FREQUENCY]. Plan: You have failed to meet the following performance standards: Standard/Expectation: [QUOTE VERBATIM FROM PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM] Observed Performance: [DESCRIBE WAYS IN WHICH EMPLOYEE FAILED TO MEET STANDARD. WHEN POSSIBLE, USE SPECIFIC DATES, PRODUCTION GOALS, ETC.] Action Plan: [DESCRIBE ACTIVITIES INTENDED TO ADDRESS AND BUILD EMPLOYEE’S SKILLS IN THAT AREA] Standard/Expectation: [QUOTE VERBATIM FROM PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM] Observed Performance: [DESCRIBE WAYS IN EMPLOYEE FAILED TO MEET STANDARD. WHEN POSSIBLE, USE SPECIFIC DATES, PRODUCTION GOALS, ETC.] Action Plan: [DESCRIBE ACTIVITIES INTENDED TO ADDRESS ISSUE AND BUILD EMPLOYEE’S SKILLS IN THAT AREA] [ETC.] Developmental Activities: In addition to the action plan items above, I am assigning or making available to you the following developmental activities. Activities which are assigned must be completed (and evidence of completion provided to me) by the date shown; activities which are offered are not a requirement of the PIP but may be helpful to you and which you may pursue at your own discretion. [DESCRIBE ASSIGNED ACTIVITY AND DATE DUE] [DESCRIBE OFFERED ACTIVITY] [ETC.] Past Corrective Action: You were previously warned, coached, and/or counseled about your failing performance on the following dates: _/_/_
What is is that individual coaches, facilitators and consultants are influenced by their own background knowledge and skills and the language they use may be interpreted somewhat differently depending upon their influences and the expectations of the client group. This can create confusion if not clearly explained. Understanding the potential meanings of this range of approaches enables me to be more precise about articulating what I am doing when I am coaching a team and how it may incorporate other approaches such as skills of facilitation or ideas of team process consultation, enabling me to develop my ideas with others. Table 6.1 Team based interventions: A continuum of approaches Team intervention Purpose of the intervention Role of consultant Time frame of intervention Team building Goal setting Relational Role clarity Problem solving Provide external facilitation for a particular team focus area. Consultant as expert Typically one off interventions focussed on current team context e.g start up phase Team facilitation Problem solving Decision making Collaboration through dialogue Guiding a process towards a particular team outcome. Consultant as expert in a particular process. Typically one off interventions focussed on team processes Team process consultation Helping the client to perceive, understand and act upon processes within their environment such as decision-making, communication and problem solving. Supports the team to explore issues, diagnose problems, and identify actions. Will confront behaviours that appear at odds with stated goals. Consultant has expertise in organisational processes. Process of collaborative problem solving over time that expands to include boundaries of the team and wider system.
Schumann, P.L. 2001. A moral principles framework for human resource management ethics, Human Resource Management Review, 11, 93-111. Snoeyenbos, M. and Humber, J. 2002. ‘Utilitarianism and business ethics’, In R.E. Frederick (Ed.) A Companion to Business Ethics, pp17-29, Malden: Blackwell Publishing. Solomon, R. 1992. Ethics and Excellence: Cooperation and Integrity in Business, Oxford: Oxford University Sorrell, J. and Hendry, T. 1994. Business Ethics, Oxford: Butterworth-Heineman. Stieb, J.A. 2009. ‘Assessing Freeman’s Stakeholder Theory’, Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 401-414. Tansley, C. (2011) ‘What do we mean by the term ‘talent’ in talent management’, Industrial and Commercial Training, 43(5), 266-274. Tarique, I. and Schuler, R. (2010) Global Talent Management: Literature review, integrative framework and suggestions for further research, Journal of World Business, 45, 122-133. Towers Watson (2011) Leading Through Uncertain times: The 2011/2012 Talent Management and Rewards Study, North America. Towers Watson. Townley, B. 1993). ‘Foucault, and its Relevance for Human Resource Management’, Academy of Management Review, 18(3) 518-546. Wayne, S. and R.C. Liden 1995. ‘Effects on Impression Management on Performance Ratings: A Longitudinal Study’, Academy of Management Journal, 38(1) 232-260. Whetstone, J.T. 2003. ‘The Language of Managerial Excellence: Virtues as Understood and Applied’, Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 343-357. Winstanley, D. and Woodall, J. (Eds) 2000. Ethical Issues in Contemporary Resource Management, New York: St Martin Press. Winstanley, D. and Woodall, J. 2000b. ‘The ethical dimension of human resource management’, Human Resource Management Journal, 10(2) 5-20. World Economic Forum. 2011. Global Talent Risk – Seven Responses, Geneva: World Economic Forum. Younger, J. and Smallwood, N. 2007. Developing Your Organization’s Brand as a Talent Developer, Human Resource Planning, 30(2), 21-29.
all clients during the supervision process, and the learning emanating from these discussions is transferred by the coach into those relationships and processes to encourage the transfer and sustainability of learning. This indirect link relies on a transfer and sustainability of learning by the coach from supervision into the coaching sessions. The study does not include any analysis of the coach’s transfer and sustainability of learning but acknowledges the contribution this learning makes to enable the transfer and sustainability of learning for the clients. CATEGORIES COACH RESPONSIBILITIES CLIENT RESPONSIBILITIES COACH AND CLIENT RESPONSIBILITIES CLIENT CENTRED PROCESS ENABLING/ FACILITATING LEARNING SESSION CONTENT ACTIVE LEARNING COACHING RELATIONSHIP REFLECTIVE LEARNING THEMES Coach In Charge Of The Process Encourage Practice Back In The Workplace Contracting: Point Colleague Feedback Comfort Reflective Diaries Tailored Tools/ Techniques Share Experience To Facilitate Learning Client Bringing Content Transfer Of Learning Measures Identified Safety/ Confidentiality/ Feedback Provider Sessions Challenge/ Support Suspend Judgement Being Open To Learning Coach And Client Match Client Context Not Therapy Client Takes Responsibility For Their Learning Face-To-Face Coaching Supervision Physical Environment Lasting Impact Of Coach Reflective Practitioner External Coach Setting Goals Coaching Consultancy Honest Dialogue Sounding Board Primary Role As Coach Friendly Support Keeping In Touch Outside Coaching Sessions Figure 2: Collaborative Action Coaching for Leaders model – identified categories (6) and themes (33) (Cook, 2011)
Smith, M.L., Van Oosten, E.B., Boyatzis, R.E. (2009), Coaching for sustained desired change, Research in Organizational Change and Development, 17:145-173 Stewart, L.J., Palmer, S., Wilkin, H., Kerrin, M. (2008), Towards a model of coaching transfer, Operationalising coaching success and the facilitators and barriers to transfer, International Coaching Psychology Review, 3(2):87-109 Stern, L.R. (2004), Executive Coaching: A Working Definition, Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 56(3):154-162 Stringer, E.T. (2007) (3 Ed), Action Research, Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Wasylyshyn, K.M. (2003), Executive Coaching: An Outcome Study, Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 55(2):94-106 Wiggins, S.A (2009), Family Exemplars During Implementation of a Home Pain Management Intervention, Issues in Comprehensive Paediatric Nursing,
result was reported in the national conference to celebrate PMAT 40th Anniversary under the conference title of “Enhancing the Company Competitive Advantage with Performance Management.” This PMS survey was conducted in 2004 among the Thai private sectors. The main objectives of this study were (1) to identify the objectives of implementing PMS in Thailand, (2) to examine the status of PMS in Thailand. The survey was distributed among 2,500 PMAT corporate members and got 9.32 % response rate (233 organizations). The study showed that most of the samples, 38.2% have established PMS in the last 3 years (around 2000 - 2001) and 29% of samples have established PMS more than 5 years. In the in-depth interview with experts found that most of the foreign companies have implemented and introduced the PMS to Thai companies. The survey found the most use of PMS in Thailand was for individual merit increase (78.5%), the second most use was for goal setting (69.1%), and the third was for promotion(65.2%) and the forth was for the training and development (62.7%). The last use was for corporate culture development (31.8%). This was an evident that most of Thai organizations had implemented PMS as performance appraisal and performance measurement, not as an organization development intervention. Research Methodology This paper was conducted as a part of the consulting team for PTT group to strengthen the PTT Group HR Fundamental in the area of Performance Management which is one of the seven modules in this project. The objectives of this project were (1) to integrate PTT Group HR Fundamental Systems, (2) to align HR Systems and Processes with PTT Group Strategy and TQA, (3) to utilize Group’s Resources: Technology & People and (4) to build Knowledge- based among the HR in PTT Group. In this paper, only the first phase of the project, HR Modules Evaluation, was presented. To evaluate the performance management system of PTT group, the consulting team used the “Triangulation design” as a research method for collecting both quantitative and qualitative data simultaneously. So the investigator can converge the data to make comparisons between detailed contextualized qualitative data and the more normative quantitative data. This design is proper used when researchers seek to
Master Degree Post Master Degree 27 5 67.5 12.5 Total years of Learning and Performance Experience (n=40) Less than 1 year 1 – 2 years 3 - 5 years 6 – 10 years 11 – 15 years More than 15 years 5 4 11 2 6 12 12.5 10.0 27.5 5.0 15.0 30.0 Current Level in Organization (n=40) Executive Director Manager Supervisor Team Leader University Faculty Private Consultant Entry Level Professional 6 3 7 8 3 5 3 5 15.0 7.5 17.5 20.0 7.5 12.5 7.5 12.5 Type of Industry/Business (n=39) Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing or Hunting Finance & Insurance Information Services & Communications Business Schools & Management Training Education Software Development Health Care & Social Services Retail Trade Manufacturing Real Estate rental & leasing (private consulting, government 2 9 6 4 4 3 3 2 2 2 3 5.1 23.1 15.4 10.3 10.3 7.7 7.7 5.1 5.1 5.1 7.7 Table 2. Summary Descriptive Statistics and Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test Results for Knowledge Areas Current Perceived and Future Perceived Importance (n = 40) Training Delivery Action Item Current Importance Median1 (1st Q /3rd Q)2 Future Importance Median1 (1st Q / 3rd Q)2 Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test p value Key knowledge areas 3.27 (2.83 / 3.67) 4.23 (3.69 / 4.85) <.001 Adult learning theories and techniques 3.00 (3.00 / 3.00) 4.00 (3.00 / 5.00) <.001 Instructional design theory & methods 2.50 (2.00 / 3.75) 4.00 (3.00 / 5.00) <.001
UFM Class Description Sheet FY 2017 (Fall 2016, Spring 2017, Summer 2017) Please complete one form for EACH class you will be teaching for UFM. PLEASE RETURN FORM BEFORE: Fall -- June 10, 2016; Spring – September 30, 2016; Summer – March 10, 2017 SEMESTER DATES (check one): Fall Aug. 22-Dec. 18, 2016 Spring Jan. 17-May 21, 2017 Summer June 5-Aug. 6, 2017 HOLIDAYS: Sept. 5, Nov. 24 & 25, April 16, July 4 *Spring Break – March 20-24 PLEASE RETURN FORM TO: Kayla Savage, Education Coordinator UFM Community Learning Center 1221 Thurston Street Manhattan, KS 66502 Phone: 785.539.8763 Fax: 785.539.9460 Email: CLASS TITLE: INSTRUCTOR(S): TITLE(S): PUBLISH? Y N FAX #: BUSINESS/ORGANIZATION: SOCIAL SECURITY # MAILING ADDRESS: street city zip NUMBER (day Number to publish in Catalog: day evening other none Scheduling Session 1 Session 2 Session 3 CLASS DATES(S) CLASS DATES(S) CLASS DATES(S) CLASS DAY(S) CLASS DAY(S) CLASS DAY(S) CLASS TIMES CLASS TIMES CLASS TIMES # MEETINGS # MEETINGS # MEETINGS (# times class meets) NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS: (In each session) Minimum Maximum No limit This program is geared for: Adults Children Teens Families Are you planning any additional advertising? Yes No If yes, describe *Additional Advertising MUST be approved by UFM Education Coordinator Approved: Date: FEES/INSTRUCTOR EXPENSES PLEASE LIST AND ITEMIZE ALL CLASS FEES TO BE PAID TO THE INSTRUCTOR: TOTAL PER PARTICIPANT EQUIPMENT AND LOCATION NEEDS
UFMCC SOCIAL MEDIA POLICY Approved by the Council of Elders 8 December 2014 Whatever you do, do everything for the glory of God. 1 Corinthians 10:31 Policy Statement: An ever-increasing number of people use and prefer digital communication over other forms. It is essential that the church be present in this medium because the responsible use of social media can enhance communication and deepen relationship. The following policy and guidelines apply commonly accepted principles of healthy boundaries and safe church to the virtual world of digital networking and communication. This policy concerns the publication of and commentary on social media by employees, clergy, and lay leaders of the Universal Fellowship of Metropolitan Community Churches (MCC). For the purpose of this policy, social media means any facility for online publication and commentary, including but not limited to: blogs and SMS (short message service) messages, collaboration applications such as wikis; social networking sites such as Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn; and photo and video sites such as Flickr and YouTube. This policy is in addition to and complements any existing policies regarding the use of technology, computers, e-mail and the internet. Protocol for UFMCC Social Media Policy MCC employees, clergy, and lay leaders are free to publish or comment via social media in accordance with this policy. MCC employees, clergy, and lay leaders are subject to this policy when they identify themselves as an MCC employee, clergy, or lay leader in any social media. The only exception is the incidental mention of place of employment or religious affiliation in a personal blog on topics unrelated to MCC. Unless representing MCC, an MCC employee, clergy, or lay leader must make it clear that the views and opinions expressed are theirs alone and do not represent the official views of MCC. All uses of social media must follow the same ethical standards that MCC employees, clergy, and lay leaders must otherwise follow. MCC social media policy violations will be subject to disciplinary action, up to and including the MCC Judiciary Process.
Auditors must be alert to improper payments, particularly when testing the following parts of section III. - A, “Activities Allowed or Unallowed;” B, “Allowable Costs/Cost Principles;” E, “Eligibility;” and, in some cases, N, “Special Tests and Provisions.”
Audit Objectives and Control Testing What Control Procedures Address the Compliance Requirement (reference/link to documentation or the testing was performed): Basis for the control (reports, resources, etc. providing information needed to understand requirements and prevent or identify and correct errors): Control Procedure (description of how auditee uses the “Basis” to prevent, or identify and correct or detect errors): Person(s) responsible for performing the control procedure (title): Description of evidence documenting the control was applied (i.e. sampling unit):
Audit Objectives and Control Testing What Control Procedures Address the Compliance Requirement (reference/link to documentation or where the testing was performed): Basis for the control (reports, resources, etc. providing information needed to understand requirements and prevent or identify and correct errors): Control Procedure (description of how auditee uses the to prevent, or identify and correct or detect errors): Person(s) responsible for performing the control procedure (title): Description of evidence documenting the control was applied (i.e. sampling unit):
Introduction: Materiality by Compliance Requirement Matrix Planning Federal Materiality by Compliance Requirement See Footnotes 1-6 below the matrix table for further explanation, in particular, review note 6 which discusses tailoring the matrix assessments. (1) (2) (6) (6) (3) (4) (5) (5) (6) Compliance Requirement Applicable per Compl. Direct & material to program / entity Monetary or nonmonetary If monetary, population subject to require. Inherent risk (IR) assess. Final control risk (CR) assess. Detection risk of noncompl. Overall audit risk of noncompl. Federal materiality by compl. requirement (Yes or No) (Yes or No) (M/N) (Dollars) (High/Low) (High/Low) (High/Low) (High/Low) typically 5% of population subject to requirement A Activities Allowed or Unallowed M 5% B Allowable Costs/Cost Principles M 5% C Cash Management N 5% D RESERVED E Eligibility M/N 5% F Equipment & Real Property Mgmt M 5% G Matching, Level of Effort, Earmark M 5% H Period of Availability (Performance) M 5% I Procurement & Sus. & Debarment N 5% J Program Income M 5% K RESERVED L Reporting N 5% M Subrecipient Monitoring N 5% N Special Tests & Provisions (Provide an assessment for each) N 5% (1) Taken form Part 2, Matrix of Compliance Requirements, of the OMB Compliance Supplement ( ). When Part 2 of the Compliance Supplement indicates that a type of compliance requirement is not applicable, the remaining assessments for the compliance requirement are not applicable. (2) If the Supplement notes a compliance requirement as being applicable to the program in column (1), it still may not apply at a particular entity either because that entity does not have activity subject to that type of compliance requirement, or the activity could not have a material effect on a major program. If the Compliance Supplement indicates that a type of compliance requirement is applicable and the auditor determines it also is direct and material to the program at the specific entity being audited, the auditor should answer this question “Yes,” and then
To continue from where you left off, after logging in; Select “My Proposal” on the left menu. Click on “Show/List”. Hover over the folder icon beside grant type with your mouse. on “Edit” under PD column. Follow Steps 5 – 9 to complete and submit your application.
Introduction: Materiality by Compliance Requirement Matrix Planning Federal Materiality by Compliance Requirement See Footnotes 1-6 below the matrix table for further explanation, in particular, review note 6 which discusses tailoring the matrix assessments. (1) (2) (6) (6) (3) (4) (5) (5) (6) Compliance Requirement Applicable per Suppl. Direct & material to program / entity Monetary or nonmonetary If monetary, population subject to require. Inherent risk (IR) assess. Final control risk (CR) assess. Detection risk of noncompl. Overall audit risk of noncompl. Federal materiality by compl. requirement (Yes or No) (Yes or No) (M/N) (Dollars) (High/Low) (High/Low) (High/Low) (High/Low) typically 5% of population subject to requirement A Activities Allowed or Unallowed M 5% B Allowable Costs/Cost Principles M 5% C Cash Management N 5% D RESERVED E Eligibility M/N 5% F Equipment & Real Property Mgmt M 5% G Matching, Level of Effort, Earmark M 5% H Period of Availability (Performance) M 5% I Procurement & Sus. & Debarment N 5% J Program Income M 5% K RESERVED L Reporting N 5% M Subrecipient Monitoring N 5% N Special Tests & Provisions - Participation of Private School Children N 5% N Special Tests & Provisions (Provide an assessment for each) N 5% (1) Taken form Part 2, Matrix of Compliance Requirements, of the OMB Compliance Supplement ( ). When Part 2 of the Compliance Supplement indicates that a type of compliance requirement is not applicable, the remaining assessments for the compliance requirement are not applicable.
Audit Objectives and Control Testing What Control Procedures Address the Compliance Requirement (reference/link to documentation or the testing was performed): Basis for the control (reports, resources, etc. providing information needed to understand requirements and prevent or identify and correct errors): Control Procedure (description of how auditee uses the “Basis” to prevent, or identify and correct or detect errors): Person(s) responsible for performing the control procedure Description of evidence documenting the control was applied (i.e. sampling unit):
Objectives and Control Testing Additional Control Test Objectives for Written Procedures: When documenting and identifying the key control(s) in place to address the compliance requirement, consider if the client has written procedures to document the control process. UG requires a written policy for the requirements outlined in (c)(1), (c)(2), (d)(3), and (c). Document whether the non-Federal entity established written procedures consistent with the following requirements: 2 CFR 200.318(c)(1) for employee conflicts of interest. 2 CFR 200.318(c)(2) for organizational conflicts of interest. 2 CFR 200.320(d)(3) for selection and awarding of competitive contracts. 2 CFR 200.319(c) for minimum evaluation criteria for bids and proposals. It is auditor judgment how to report instances where the entity either lacks having a written policy or their written policy is insufficient to meet the requirements of 2 CFR 200.318(c)(1), 2 CFR 200.318(c)(2), 2 CFR 200.320(d)(3), and 2 CFR 200.319(c). auditors would normally use a written policy as the basis for the compliance control, there could be other key controls in place to ensure program compliance. The lack of a policy be noncompliance, which could rise to the level of material noncompliance and even a control deficiency (SD / MW) if there were underlying internal control deficiencies. If there are key controls in place operating effectively, AOS auditors would report the lack of the required UG policy as a management letter citation. However, in subsequent audits, evaluate if the noncompliance should be elevated if not adopted. Written policies aid in consistency and adherence to requirements strengthening internal control processes. What Control Procedures Address the Compliance Requirement (reference/link to documentation or where the testing was performed): for the control (reports, resources, etc. providing information needed to understand requirements and prevent or identify and correct errors): Control Procedure (description of how auditee uses the “Basis” to prevent, or identify and correct or detect errors): Person(s) responsible for performing the control procedure
Suggested Compliance Procedures – De Minimis Indirect Cost Rate Note: The following subsections identify requirements specific to each type of entity. Suggested Audit Procedures – Compliance (Substantive Tests) (Reference / link to documentation where testing was performed testing): The following suggested audit procedures apply to any non-Federal entity using a de minimis indirect cost rate, whether as a recipient or a subrecipient. None of the procedures related to indirect costs in the sections organized by type of non-Federal entity apply when a de minimis rate is used. Consider the results of the testing of internal control in assessing the risk of noncompliance. Use this as the basis for determining the nature, timing, and extent (e.g., number of transactions to be selected) of substantive tests of compliance. 1. Determine that the non-Federal entity has not previously claimed indirect on the basis of a negotiated rate. Auditors are required to test only for the three fiscal years immediately prior to the current audit period. 2. Test a sample of transactions for conformance with . a Select a sample of claims for reimbursement of indirect and verify that the de minimis rate was used consistently, the rate was applied to the appropriate base, and the amounts claimed were the product of applying the rate to a modified total direct costs base. b Verify that the costs included in the base are consistent with the costs that were included in the base year, i.e., verify that current year modified total direct costs do not include costs items that were treated as indirect costs in the base year. 3. For a non-Federal entity conducting a single function, which is predominately funded by Federal awards, determine whether use of the de minimis indirect cost rate resulted in the non-Federal entity double-charging or inconsistently charging costs as both direct and indirect.
Audit Objectives and Control Testing What Control Procedures Address the Compliance Requirement (reference/link to documentation or where the testing was performed): Basis for the control (reports, resources, etc. providing information needed to understand requirements and prevent or identify and correct errors): Control Procedure (description of how auditee uses the “Basis” to prevent, or identify and correct or detect errors): Person(s) responsible for performing the control procedure (title): Description of evidence documenting the control was applied (i.e. sampling unit):
Introduction: Materiality by Compliance Requirement Matrix Planning Federal Materiality by Compliance Requirement See Footnotes 1-6 the matrix table for further explanation, in particular, review note 6 which discusses tailoring the matrix assessments. (1) (2) (6) (6) (3) (4) (5) (5) (6) Compliance Requirement Applicable per Compl. Suppl. Direct & material to program / entity Monetary or nonmonetary If monetary, population subject to require. Inherent risk (IR) assess. Final control risk (CR) assess. Detection risk of noncompl. Overall audit risk of noncompl. Federal materiality by compl. requirement (Yes or No) (Yes or No) (M/N) (Dollars) (High/Low) (High/Low) (High/Low) (High/Low) typically 5% of population subject to requirement A Activities Allowed or Unallowed Yes M 5% B Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Yes M 5% C Cash Management Yes N 5% D RESERVED E Eligibility No F Equipment & Real Property Mgmt Yes M 5% G Matching, Level of Effort, Earmark Yes M 5% H Period of Availability (Performance) Yes M 5% I Procurement & Sus. & Debarment Yes N 5% J Program Income Yes M 5% K RESERVED L Reporting Yes N 5% M Subrecipient Monitoring No N Special Tests & Provisions - Wage Rate Requirement Yes N 5% N Special & Provisions – Environmental Oversight Yes N 5% N Special & Provisions – Environmental Reviews Yes N 5% N Special Tests & Provisions – Citizen Participation Yes N 5% N Special Tests & Provisions – Rehabilitation Using NSP Funds Yes N 5%
Auditors must be to improper payments, particularly when testing the following parts of section III. - A, “Activities Allowed or Unallowed;” B, “Allowable Costs/Cost Principles;” E, “Eligibility;” and, in some cases, N, “Special Tests and Provisions.”
Auditors must be to improper payments, particularly when testing the following parts of section III. - A, “Activities Allowed or Unallowed;” B, “Allowable Costs/Cost Principles;” E, “Eligibility;” and, in some cases, N, “Special Tests and Provisions.”
Audit Objectives and Control Testing What Control Procedures Address the Compliance Requirement (reference/link to documentation or the testing was performed): Basis for the control (reports, resources, etc. providing information needed to understand requirements and prevent or identify and correct errors): Control Procedure (description of how auditee uses the “Basis” to prevent, or identify and correct or detect errors): Person(s) responsible for performing the control procedure (title): Description of evidence documenting the control was applied (i.e. sampling unit):
Undergraduate Research Reception and Poster Session October 2, 2012 Terry Truong and Dr. Shannon Datwyler – Biological Sciences Phylogeography of the woody Penstemons (Subgenus Dasanthera) Matt O’Neal and Dr. Brian Hausback – Geology Changes in Fractal Dimension of Volcanic Particles with Respect to Distance from Source Christina Corona, Maia Sosiuk and Dr. Ruth Ballard – Biological Sciences Recovery of sperm from the inside of a washing machine Middlebrook, Sukhraj Kaur and Dr. Ruth Ballard – Biological Sciences Effect of dry-cleaning on blood stains Nicholas Novotny and Dr. Brian Hausback – Geology Magma Evolution & Crystal Growth in the Sutter Buttes Alyssa Raisis and Dr. Brian Hausback – Geology Hydrovolcanism in the High Rock Caldera, Nevada Kiara Velazquez and Dr. John D. Spence – Chemistry Synthesis and Reactivity of Electron Rich Arenediynes Demetri Papamichalis, Dr. Jerome Buerki, Dr. Tatiana Sergan and Dr. Vassili Sergan – Physics and Astronomy Numerical modeling of flexo-electric dormation in nematic liquid crystals with zero and negative anisotropy of dielectric permittivity in the presence of the transverse electric field Brooke Vonada, Phoenix Li, Sukhraj Kaur and Dr. Thomas Savage – Chemistry Cloning of Genes Encoding Prenyltransferases that may be involved in Domoic Acid Production Chelcy Mashburn and Dr. Thomas – Biological Sciences Development of an HPLC Method for Isolation and Quantification of Catecholamines in Diabetic Wound Tissue Kristy Minnick-Maclure and Dr. Benjamin Gherman – Chemistry Computational Study of Cyclization Reactions of Monosubstituted Enediynes and Comparison to Disubstituted Enediynes Sylvanna Krawczyk and Dr. David Zeigler – Mathematics Buoyancy-Driven Groundwater Flow as a Non-Chaotic System Kayli Dam and Dr. Katherine McReynolds – Chemistry Formation of an Amine-terminated Core for Glycodendrimer Synthesis Joseph Gomes and Dr. Kelly McDonald – Biological Sciences
[Complainant] REQUEST TO REMOVE THE STAY OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING v. [Respondent] Case Number: FA[ ] The [Complainant / Respondent], acting within the period of a previously granted Stay of Administrative Proceeding under UDRP Supplemental Rule 6(b) hereby requests that the Stay of Administrative Proceeding for the above referenced Complaint be removed and the Complaint be reinstated pursuant to Supplemental Rule 6(b). Respectfully Submitted, By: [Party] Dated: OPTIONAL: By: [Party] Dated:
1279 BAIJU KUMAR YADAV RAJ YADAV 1280 KESHAV RAJ RAJ PASWAN 1281 RAMAN KUMAR YADAV BHOGENDRA YADAV 1282 SUMIT KUMAR MISHRA SUMAN KUMAR MISHRA 1291 SANTOSH KUMAR SINGH RAM LAKHAN SINGH 1293 CHAUDHARY DURGESH DINESH DINESH CHAUDHARY 1296 BABLU KUMAR LAL BAHADUR 1300 BINDE KUMAR ROY DUKHI ROY 1301 ADIL ANSARI ASHFAQUE AKHTAR JUILANI 1305 RAUSHAN KUMAR CHAUDHARY BINOD KAMAT 1306 RISHIKESH KUMAR RAY RAM CHANDAR RAY 1307 VICKEY KUMAR RAY SURESH RAY 1308 RITESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY DEVENDRA CHAUDHARY 1312 NEHA KUMARI KRISHNA PRASAD 1313 AMAN SINGH DHANPATI SINGH 1315 RAJESH KUMAR PRASAD YADAV 1321 DHRUB KUMAR RAY RAY 1323 SUNIL KUMAR BINOD THAKUR 1324 MD. RAIHAN FAZAL MD. HUSSAIN 1326 BIJAY KUMAR DEV NARAYAN MAHTO 1327 MANOJ YADAV JAGDISH YADAV 1329 UJALA KUMAR SAH KUKHI SAH 1330 NIRAJ KUMAR SINGH SHIV KUMAR SINGH 1339 MUKESH KUMAR SURESH MAHTO 1341 CHANDRA BHUSHAN YADAV VISHNU DEO YADAV 1344 CHANDAN YADAV JIVACHH 1346 SHYAM KUMAR RAY RAJENDRA RAY 1350 RAM DHANI KUMAR MAKSUDAN MANDAL 1351 SHATRUDHAN JHA LAKSHMESHWAR JHA 1353 MD. ISRAFIL MD.SALIM 1355 RAJESH DAS PARICHAN DAS 1357 ASHUTOSH KUMAR RAY GOURI SHANKAR RAY 1358 MD. SAFIUR RAHMAN ANSARI MD. HANZALA ANSARI 1360 SURYA MOHAN KUMAR MOHTI YADAV 1365 LAXMAN KUMAR YADAV NATHUNI YADAV 1366 SAURAV KUMAR JHA PHEK NATH JHA 1367 JITENDRA KUMAR MAHTO NARYAN MAHTO
We will ensure young people have access to opportunities and activities that stretch and enhance their childhood. We will ensure children and young people stay on a path to success, through sound interagency working and participation. A statement of the facilities and services to be provided for the young people accommodated in the children’s home. Underley Garden Children’s Home is situated in Cumbria within a quiet, rural setting. Registered for up to forty eight young people, the site comprises of seven large houses, two single occupancy houses with three bedrooms. Within each house there is a well-fitted large family kitchen with dishwasher, fridge/freezer, and microwave and a separate utility room. We have a range of different bedroom layouts in order to suit individual young people’s needs. The bedrooms within the larger houses on site are all fitted with shower rooms in order to maximise both privacy and independence. Some of these en-suite rooms are fitted as ‘wet rooms’ allowing for staff to support our more complex young people with personal care. Standard domestic equipment and furnishings have been used in line with ‘ordinary’ living principles. However, if required, specialist equipment can be made available for individual children. Young people have access to a phone and the internet on individualised basis in line with care plans to ensure attachments are maintained with significant people. The communal living areas contain a selection of resources including televisions, video, music and DVD players, and computers with internet facilities, games, books and craft activities. There is also a safe enclosed outdoor patio area for the young people which we aim to encourage the use of in the summer months. There is an outdoor play area comprising football and basketball pitch, as well as a small play area. Each young person has their own bedroom with single lockable door. They are decorated and furnished to a high standard. Privacy and independence is encouraged through the home layout. All communal spaces are decorated in neutral tones in recognition of the need to minimise sensory overload. Young people will be consulted about the décor in their personal space which reflects their individual personality and taste. There is also an office which the staff team use to hold their papers and files as well as a separate staff sleep in room. The area is rich in local amenities including shops, library, local parks, leisure centres, cinema and bowling alley. There is a variety of good transport links with all the major towns in the area so providing greater opportunities for a wide variety of activities and
Person Specification Element Criteria Essential (E) or Desirable (D) Communication Able to breakdown and communicate complex issues in an easily understandable way E Confident in communicating and working in partnership with a wide range of individuals and groups E Able to utilise a number of different of communication, including social media, to engage with students. E Able to use negotiation and compromise to secure a positive outcome for students D Change-Driven Able to evaluate and identify potential improvements to learning, teaching and student experience E Confident in using problem-solving techniques to identify potential solutions to emerging issues E Able to work individually, and with others, to implement improvements to learning, teaching and the student experience. E Organisation Strong time management and organisation skills. E Able to manage multiple priorities and commitments to deliver to agreed deadlines E Able to lead and coordinate groups of individuals D Awareness Has a basic understanding of some of the issues impacting students within Higher Education E Is driven to grow knowledge and understanding within this area D Previous experience of student representation i.e. Course Representative, or similar role D
May we contact this employer? Yes No Telephone: ( ) - Job Name and address of company and type of business: From Mo./Yr. To Mo./Yr. Starting Salary Ending Salary Reason for Leaving / / Describe your duties: May we contact this employer? Yes No Telephone: ( ) - Job Title: Name and address of company and type of business: From Mo./Yr. To Mo./Yr. Starting Salary Ending Salary Reason for Leaving / / Describe your duties: May we contact this employer? Yes No Telephone: ( ) - Job Title: Are you able to perform the essential functions of the position for which you are applying with or without reasonable accommodation? Yes No REFERENCES PERSONAL Name Address Phone No. ( ) - ( ) - ( ) - PROFESSIONAL (Supervisor, Teacher, etc.) Name Address Phone No. ( ) - ( ) - ( ) -
Activities and Assignments PAGEREF _Toc46 \h 15 SESSION 8 – GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION IN GHANA PAGEREF _Toc47 \h 15 Overview PAGEREF _Toc48 \h 15 Goals and Objectives PAGEREF _Toc49 \h 15 Activities and Assignments PAGEREF _Toc50 \h 15 SESSION 9 – PUBLIC POLICY MAKING: PART 1– CONCEPTUAL ISSUES PAGEREF _Toc51 \h 15 Overview PAGEREF _Toc52 \h 16 Goals and Objectives PAGEREF _Toc53 \h 16 Activities and Assignments PAGEREF _Toc54 \h 16 SESSION 10 – PUBLIC POLICY MAKING: PART 2 – ACTORS AND PROCESSES IN PAGEREF _Toc55 \h 16 Overview PAGEREF _Toc56 \h 16 Goals and Objectives PAGEREF _Toc57 \h 16 Activities and Assignments PAGEREF _Toc58 \h 17 SESSION 11 – PUBLIC SECTOR CORRUPTION AND ACCOUNTABILITY PAGEREF _Toc59 \h 17 Overview PAGEREF _Toc60 \h 17 Goals and Objectives PAGEREF _Toc61 \h 17 Activities and Assignments PAGEREF _Toc62 \h 17 SESSION 12 – THE ‘NEW’ PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION PAGEREF _Toc63 \h 17 Overview PAGEREF _Toc64 \h 17 Goals and Objectives PAGEREF _Toc65 \h 18 Activities and Assignments PAGEREF _Toc66 \h 18 SESSION 13 – LEADERSHIP IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION PAGEREF _Toc67 \h 18 Overview PAGEREF _Toc68 \h 18 Goals and Objectives PAGEREF _Toc69 \h 18 Activities and Assignments PAGEREF _Toc70 \h 18
DATE (Day) SEMESTER TOPIC FACULTY TIME: 1.00 - 2.00 PM 2.00 – 3.00 PM 3.00 – 4.00 PM 1ST Hour 2nd Hour 12-12-16 (Monday) Third HOLIDAY Fourth 13-12-16 (Tuesday) Fourth Fifth Cancer chemotherapy Cancer chemotherapy Dr.Vinu Dr.Vinu 14-12-16 (Wednesday) Third Fourth Fifth Cancer chemotherapy Cancer chemotherapy Dr.Vinu Dr.Vinu 15-12-16 (Thursday) Third Fourth Aminoglycosides Dr.Rajamony Malaria Malaria Dr.Shobha 16-12-16 (Friday) Pharmacogenetics Clinical trials Dr.Nirmal Dr.Nirmal Fourth 17-12-16 (Saturday) Third Rational drug use Dr.Suji (Dr.Vijayalekshmi) Fourth Broad spectrum antibiotics Dr.Sunitha Fifth Broad spectrum antibiotics Dr.Sunitha Department of Pharmacology Sree Gokulam Medical College & Research Foundation, Venjaramoodu, Trivandrum Teaching Schedule for Second M.B.B.S. Students DATE (Day) SEMESTER TOPIC FACULTY TIME: 1.00 - 2.00 PM 2.00 – 3.00 PM 3.00 – 4.00 PM 1ST Hour 2nd Hour
19-12-16 (Monday) Third Introduction to ANS Dr.Vijayalekshmi Fourth Macrolides Aminoglycosides Dr.Rajamony Dr.Nirmal Fifth Cancer Chemotheraphy Cancer Chemotheraphy Dr.Vinu Dr.Vinu 20-12-16 (Tuesday) Third Fourth Fifth Practicals Practicals All Staff All Staff 21-12-16 (Wednesday) Third Fourth Fifth Practicals Practicals All Staff All Staff 22-12-16 (Thursday) Third Fourth T.B-1 Dr.Sunitha T.B-1 T.B-2 Dr.Sunitha 23-12-16 (Friday) Third Cholinergics-2 Cholinergics-3 Dr.Vijayalekshmi Dr.Vinu Fourth Fifth 24-12-16 (Saturday) Third Fourth HOLIDAY Department of Pharmacology Sree Gokulam Medical College & Research Foundation, Venjaramoodu, Trivandrum Teaching Schedule for Second M.B.B.S. Students DATE (Day) SEMESTER TOPIC FACULTY TIME: 1.00 - 2.00 PM 2.00 – 3.00 PM 3.00 – 4.00 PM 1ST Hour 2nd Hour 26-12-16 Third Fourth HOLIDAY
B.E (CSE) S3 - I Person : Lunch Break (12.15 - 1.10) Advisor : Class Room: KP - 104 Period Day 1 8.30 - 9.20 2 9.25 - 10.15 3 10.30 – 11.20 4 11.25 – 12.15 5 1.10 - 2.00 6 2.05 - 2.55 7 3.00 - 3.50 8 3.55 - 4.45 Mon CS7311 ground floor lab CS7351 MA7359 CS7302 Tue CS7351 EE7306 IT7351 CS7301 Wed MA7359 CS7302 IT7351 Thu IT7351 EE7306 CS7302 CS7351 CS7301 Fri CS7312 THIRD floor lab EE7306 MA7359 Code Theory/Practical Subject Staff Handling the Course ARMS id CS7301 Theory Object Oriented Programming Dr.S.Sudha, Assistant Professor (Sr.Gr.) 60724 CS7302 Programming and Data Structures II Dr.P.Geetha, Associate Professor 65821 CS7351 Software Engineering Dr.R.Baskaran, Associate Professor 64783 EE7306 Electrical Engineering and Control Systems Ms.P.Vijayalaxmi, Assistant Professor 701734 IT7351 Digital Principles and Design Dr.V.Vetriselvi, Associate Professor 60735 MA7359 Algebra and Number Theory Dr. K. Muralidoss, Visiting Faculty 702060 CS7311 Practical Digital Laboratory Dr.V.Vetriselvi, Associate Professor 60735 CS7312 Programming and Data Structures Laboratory II Dr.P.Geetha, Associate Professor 65821
Speaking on the occasion Mr. Parkhi emphasized the need for the student fraternity to understand the budget and its importance to the common man. The seminar saw 19 colleges from across the state participate and present papers at the Seminar. f. Seminar on “Impact on Brands: Traditional Vs Digital Media” – 27th March 2015 IndSearch organized a seminar on “Impact on Brands: Traditional Vs Digital Media” on Friday, 27th March 2015. Mr. Devdatta Mandore Founder Webclincher Technologies , a digital Marketing Firm and Ms. Jeenal Hemnaney-Manager Ad sales at MaXposure Media India Pvt. Ltd. were the guest speakers. Both the speakers gave a introduction about the topic. The Speakers highlighted on the importance of having a synergy between both the media formats rather than sticking to one format. Both media had their own pros and cons and a synergy was the best way for an organization to increase its reach and be cost effective. Special Lectures – The Following Guest Lectures were delivered from July 2014 to June 2015 Sr. No Topic Resource Person Organization Date 1. Consumer Insights and understanding the Indian Consumer Mr. Kishore Chakraborti Vice President, Consumer Insight and Human Futures Development for Mc Cann Erickson India 18th of August 2014 2. Ancient Indian technology and the contribution of India towards modern science and technology Dr. Sivathanu Pillai Chief Controller of research & development at DRDO 21st August 2014 3. Sustained Career Growth Mr. Nitin Deshpande Chief Financial Officer D.S.Kulkarni Developers Ltd, Pune 11th December 2014
4 Career opportunities in Africa Mr. Nachiket Patankar Head Finance & Admin Securex Agencies (U) Limited 30th December 2014 5. Bottom of the pyramid Mr.Ashish Gawade CEO and at Bottom of Pyramid Energy and Environmental Innovations, India (BoPEEI) 24th of January 2015 6. Digital Marketing Mr. Abhyankar Head- Amigos , a venture of EFL 3rd April2015 ADD-On Add-On Modules given to students of IndSearch in 2014-15 are Sr. No Topic Resource Person Date 1. Advanced Excel Mr. Vivek Marathe 5th Jan to 9th Jan 2015 2. Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility Prof.Michele Gee – UW Parkside USA 12th Jan to 16th Jan 2015 3. Business Analytics Patil 5th Feb to 28th March 2015 4. Mock Interviews Mr. Siddhartha Gosavi, Mr.Sourabh Dutt, Ms.Radhika Kulkarni, Ms.Kirti Khole, 15th February 2015 Co-
Department of Pharmacology Sree Gokulam Medical College & Research Foundation, Venjaramoodu, Trivandrum Teaching Schedule for Second M.B.B.S. Students DATE (Day) SEMESTER TOPIC FACULTY TIME: 1.00 - 2.00 PM 2.00 – 3.00 PM 3.00 – 4.00 PM 1ST Hour 2nd Hour 04-09-17 (Monday) Third Fourth HOLIDAY Fifth 05-09-17 (Tuesday) Third Fourth HOLIDAY Fifth 06-09-17 (Wednesday) Third Fourth HOLIDAY Fifth 07-09-17 (Thursday) Third Fourth Practicals (ADR) Practicals (ADR) Dr.Nisha Dr. Saranya Fifth 08-09-17 (Friday) Hypertension Management of Hypertension Dr.Rajamony Dr.Nirmal Fourth Fifth 09-09-17 (Saturday) OHA Dr.Vinu Fourth OHA Dr.Vinu
DATE (Day) TOPIC FACULTY TIME: 1.00 - 2.00 PM 2.00 – 3.00 PM 3.00 – 4.00 PM 1ST Hour 2nd Hour 25-9-17 (Monday) Third Shock Practicals Dr.Rajamony Dr.Nisha Fourth Fifth Practicals Practicals Dr.Saranya Dr.Saranya 26-9-17 (Tuesday) Third Fourth Fifth SEMINAR SEMINAR All Staff All Staff 27-9-17 (Wednesday) Third Fourth Fifth SEMINAR SEMINAR All Staff All Staff 28-9-17 (Thursday) Fourth Fifth Prescription Drug interaction Dr. Vinu Dr. Nirmal 29-9-17 (Friday) Fourth HOLIDAY Fifth 30-9-17 (Saturday) Third Fourth HOLIDAY Fifth
approval to the Organisation. This includes the recommendation for MOE, associated documents approval and management personnel acceptance. Note: In the case it appears necessary to adjust the requested scope of approval, then a Form 2 shall be re-issued reflecting the scope of approval to be recommended. Issuance of an Approval. The recommendation package received from the assigned inspector is reviewed by the EASA for compliance and accuracy. Once satisfied EASA will prepare for signature by an EASA authorised person, as applicable: the certificate EASA Form 3; the approval letter of the MOE, together with its associated document(s) and list(s); the nominated personnel EASA Form 4s acceptance letters. EASA will send the formal approval of all documents related to the Part 145 approval such as EASA form 3 Certificate, accepted FORM 4s, MOE, associated procedures and lists letter to the applicant with a copy to the Accredited NAA/QE that performed the oversight on behalf of EASA. The EASA Applications & Procurement Department will then establish the first annual surveillance fee invoice. The first annual invoice is due immediately after the issuance of the certificate. Time Frame. The normal time frame to process a PART 145 approval is about 8 months from the allocation date; however the amount of time taken is largely dependent on the ability of the applicant to produce the documentation required and to rectify any non-conformity that may be identified during the certification process. Unless duly justified failure to meet this time frame might lead the Agency to terminate the application.
Foreign Part 147 approvals – User guide for Applicants Name Validation Date Prepared by: Alessandro ZANUZZI Validated 13/07/2011 Verified by: Karl SPECHT Validated 15/07/2011 Reviewed by: Oscar FERREIRA Validated 27/07/2011 Approved by: Wilfried SCHULZE Validated 28/07/2011 Authorised by: Francesco BANAL Validated 28/07/2011
Categories Sub categories Total by Sub categories Total 1.1 Management personnel Accountable manager Quality manager Line maintenance manager Base maintenance manager Workshop manager 1.2 Technical support staff Planners Librarians Engineers Technical record staff 1.3 Safety, quality policy & quality system staff Safety & quality Policy Maintenance procedure Auditors Quality control SMS 1.4 certifying staff Aircraft “A” Category Aircraft “B1” Category Aircraft “B2” Category Aircraft “B3” Category Aircraft “C” Category Engine & APU Component Specialized Services commander or flight engineer holding a limited certification authorisation 1.5 B1 and B2 Support staff for base maintenance “B1” Support staff “B2” Support
1.6 Maintenance Technical staff Aircraft Engine & APU Component Specialized service 1.6.1 Store and purchasing staff 1.6.2 Training staff 1.6.3 Certifying staff IAW 145.A.30(g) 1.6.4 Contracted staff Total :