Assessment Data: NOTE: our data sources have changed; therefore will be two tables here – one for Spring 2014 data, and one for Spring 2015-Fall 2015 data. Spring 2014-Fall 2014 Assessment Data STAR 12 Scores Semester Spring 2014 Summer 2014 Fall 2014 54 0 21 STAR (US) K2a Demonstrates Knowledge of Content 100% 95.2% STAR (US) K2c Demonstrates Awareness of Literacy Instruction Across All Content Areas 100% 95.2% STAR US) K2d Makes content relevant and accessible to all learners 100% 100% Praxis II: Elementary Education Scores 2013-2014 213 Percent 99% *Please note that the 213 represents both the Undergraduate B.A. in Elementary Education program and the Elementary Graduate Certificate in Teaching Program. Spring 2015-Fall 2015 Assessment Data Program Teaching Graduate Certificate ELED Semester Fall 2015 Traditional Fall 2015 Distance Ed Spring 2015 Traditional Spring 2015 Distance Ed Count 19 13 0 0 29 24 0 0 STAR 2012 US STAR CT STAR US STAR DE CT STAR DE US STAR CT STAR US STAR DE CT STAR DE K1 AVERAGE: Learner Development & Learning Differences Average for 2.37 2.46 2.59 2.65 % Proficient 100% 96.15% 100% 100% K2 AVERAGE: Content Knowledge Average for 2.45 2.48 2.66 2.59 % Proficient 100% 100% 100% 98.96% Average for Group 2.49 2.46 2.71 2.70
Performance Outcome: Identify the percentage of students assessed that should be able to demonstrate proficiency in this student learning outcome and the of proficiency expected. Example: 80% of the students assessed will achieve a score of “acceptable” or higher on the Oral Presentation Scoring Rubric. (Note: a copy of the scoring rubric, complete with cell descriptors for each level of performance, is to be submitted electronically to the designated folder on the designated shared drive.) The program expects 90% of its students to earn at least Level 2 on Elements 1 and 3 of the Mentorship Project (out of 3 levels). Assessment Data: NOTE: our data sources have changed; therefore will be two tables here – one for Spring 2014 data, and one for Spring 2015-Fall 2015 data. Spring 2014-Fall 2014 Assessment Data Assessment Data Fall 2014 Summer 2014 Spring 2014 Count 0 4 7 TTLP Project from ELED 6311 Element 1: Research Based Tasks Count at Level 1 0 0 % at Level 1 0% 0% Count at Level 2 3 5 % at Level 2 75% 71.4% Count at Level 3 1 2 % at Level 3 25% 28.6% TTLP Project from ELED 6311 Element 2: Planned Pedagogies Count at Level 1 0 0 % at Level 1 0% 0% Count at Level 2 3 5 % at Level 2 75% 71.4% Count at Level 3 1 2 % at Level 3 25% 28.6% TTLP Project from ELED 6311 Element 3: Analysis of Student Work Count at Level 1 0 0 % at Level 1 0% 0% Count at Level 2 3 5 % at Level 2 75% 71.4% Count at Level 3 1 2 % at Level 3 25% 28.6% TTLP Project from ELED 6311 Element 4: Reflection Count at Level 1 0 0 % at Level 1 0% 0% at Level 2 3 5 % at Level 2 75% 71.4% Count at Level 3 1 2 % at Level 3 25% 28.6% Spring 2015-Fall 2015 Assessment Data Distance Education ONLY Assessment Data Fall 2015 Spring 2015 Count 0 0 Mentorship Project from ELED 6316 Count at Level 1
Performance Outcome: Identify the percentage of students assessed that should be able to demonstrate proficiency in this student learning outcome and the level of proficiency expected. Example: 80% of the students assessed will achieve a score of “acceptable” or higher on the Oral Presentation Scoring Rubric. (Note: a copy of the scoring rubric, complete with cell descriptors for each level of performance, is to be submitted electronically to the designated folder on the designated shared drive.) This assessment measure will be embedded into program coursework and reported on in the 2016 reports. Assessment Data: NOTE: our data sources have changed; therefore there will be two tables here – one for Spring 2014-Fall 2014 data, and one for Spring 2015-Fall 2015 data. Spring 2014-Fall 2014 Assessment Data Spring 2014-Fall 2014 Assessment Data Semester Spring 2014 Fall 2014 Count 1 2 TIP, EE2A: 3g 100% 100% Count 1 2 TIP, EE2A: 3h 100% 100% Count 5 1 TIP, EE2B: 4c 100% 100% Spring 2015-Fall 2015 Assessment Data There are no data currently available for the revised SLO 4. Data will be reported for the 2016 report year. Changes to be implemented Fall 2016: Based upon the 2015 assessment data included in this annual report, what changes/improvements will the program implement during the next academic year to improve performance on this student learning outcome? We will continue to analyze data to find points of instructional and evaluative improvements. College: __College of Education ________________________________________________________ Department: __Reading and Elementary Education ________________________________________ Program: Masters of Education in Reading Education _____________________________________