and others are in those areas, use them to prove objects, where they are. Also use satellite and aerial photogrammetric -- I knew I was going to say that wrong -- photogrammetric -- yes, you know what I mean -- to prove the existence position of objects. And then we go into a few examples. And further comment that this is a low-cost, low-overhead method of detecting wrecks and obstructions in water. It won't suffice for disprovals but it will help declutter the chart. Any other comments or questions, clarifications in this section? (No response.) MEMBER SHINGLEDECKER: Okay, moving along to Small Craft Charts. There was a question about do the red arrows indicate north for each chart panel? It is not clear. The orientation of each chart
if any of you guys would like to make a comment, we would welcome you. And if I missed any public folks, I apologize. But Carol, if you wanted to say anything, I know you're on. If you want to self-unmute, you are welcome. We would welcome your comments. So, Shana Kinsey-Carlsen, if you are on the -- if you have logged in through the webinar, you would make a comment at this point. And Rachel, also, if you had a comment you wanted to make, that is, I think later. Okay, I see no I see no questions. RADM Wait we had a question or something. Jim Haussener has a question that we are going to try and make bigger so we can read it. I wanted to see if there were any
run the show? I'm just conscious of our time and where some of the interest this time, especially when it came to the unmanned systems for the majority of the group. MEMBER SAADE: I can make a recommendation. There is an Arctic Ice Conference of some sort in the middle of July that some of us are going to be attending. And it would be probably pretty straightforward to do a summary of what is discussed at that meeting, as opposed to an entire panel. MEMBER HALL: I like your head is at. RADM SMITH: So we have -- HANSON: Since this is Lawson's last meeting, I want to make sure he gets a wrap-up. MEMBER HALL: Yes, and that is why I want to find the most kind of effective way to do it. And I'm not sure a full panel but I
that it seems we have had pretty good representation in a number of meetings from Army Corps individual districts. One of the biggest challenges I see with the Army Corps is there is just so little consistency district to district, to district. And that is one of the biggest challenges we face is that that inconsistency is hard for you guys to deal with. And so if there is any way we can get somebody from the top, that would be where I would shoot for. RADM SMITH: All right. I'll just shoot for Jackson. He's a good guy. And in fact, if we got him to agree to it in principle, we could use it as a bit of milestone for making some progress. MS. MERSFELDER-LEWIS: Since our next meeting is going to be in DC after this, like you know March/April kind of time frame, and the Philly guys, if we can't fit them into
why don't we -- we've got two Eds. Start with the Eds. RADM SMITH: Okay. MS. MERSFELDER-LEWIS: I'll give you the list. RADM SMITH: Why don't we start with an Ed? Kelly. MEMBER Two Eds are always better than one. This is Ed Kelly. I've got nothing right now. RADM SMITH: Okay, thanks, Ed. Mr. Saade? I don't think we have Ed Saade. Carol Lockhart. MS. MERSFELDER-LEWIS: I think they have to unmute themselves again. RADM Do we have people muted by accident again? MS. MERSFELDER-LEWIS: No, they have to unmute themselves.