Ballot Pool Opened: 3/21/2016 - 4/8/2016 Ballot Period: 4/12/2016 - 4/28/2016 Total Ballot Pool: 92 Total Number of Votes: 83 Quorum: 0.9022 Weighted Vote: 85% Ballot Results The Document has Passed Voting Sectors Total In Ballot Pool Votes Sector Weight Yes Votes Weighted Segment Vote No Votes Abstain Total Votes* for Quorum Didn't Vote Distribution 16 15 1 13 86.7% 2 0 15 1 End User Representative 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 Generation 20 15 1 12 80.0% 3 1 16 4 Marketers and Brokers 11 11 1 9 81.8% 2 0 11 0 Other Non-Registered WECC Members and Participating Stakeholders 3 2 0.2 2 20.0% 0 0 2 1 State and Provincial Representatives 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 System Coordination 19 17 1 15 88.2% 2 0 17 2 Transmission 23 22 1 19 86.4% 3 0 22 1 Totals 92 82 5.2 70 85.2% 12 1 83 9 Title Company Sector Vote Comments Created By WECC-0100 Balancing Authority of Northern California System Coordination Yes See Comments for SMUD WECC-0100 Joe Tarantino WECC-0100 Sacramento Municipal Utility District Distribution Yes See Comments for SMUD WECC-0100 Joe Tarantino WECC-0100 Sacramento Municipal Utility District Marketers and Brokers Yes See Comments for SMUD WECC-0100 Joe Tarantino WECC-0100 Sacramento Municipal Utility District Transmission Yes See Comments for SMUD WECC-0100 Joe Tarantino WECC-0100 Sacramento Municipal Utility District Generation Yes See Comments for SMUD WECC-0100 Joe Tarantino
potential for Cascading/uncontrolled sep. The Rationale section states, “WR4 is designed to establish screening criteria that when exceeded may require further investigation of instability. The Request is not intended to show the presence of Cascading or instability.” In this case, Rationale section answers the question since it states the criteria is for screening for potential instability not identifying instability; and can be used to help clarify the WR4 language. Recommend adding voltage deviation equation in the Criterion: Voltage deviation(%)=(Change in Voltage/Initial Voltage*100 WECC-0100 Arizona Public Service Company Generation Yes Jeri Freimuth WECC-0100 Idaho Power Company Transmission Yes Laura Nelson WECC-0100 Idaho Power Company Distribution Yes Laura Nelson WECC-0100 Idaho Power Company Generation Yes Laura Nelson WECC-0100 Idaho Power Company System Coordination Yes Laura Nelson WECC-0100 Public Service Company of Colorado (Xcel Energy) Generation No PSCo provides the following comments in conjunction with the NEGATIVE vote. · Document’s contents (system David Lemmons
WECC-0100 Portland General Electric Company System Coordination Yes Angela Gaines WECC-0100 Salt River Project Generation No SRP has proposed changes. Kevin Nielsen WECC-0100 Salt River Project Marketers and Brokers No Clarify “nominal” in WR 1.1.1 Align WR 4 with the Peak methodology for the determination of IROLs William Abraham WECC-0100 Salt River Project Transmission No Specifically SRP would like: Clarify “nominal” in WR 1.1.1 Align WR 4 with the Peak methodology for the determination of IROLs . Steven Cobb WECC-0100 Inland Empire Energy Center LLC Generation Yes Ben Kling WECC-0100 California Independent System Operator System Coordination Yes Richard Vine WECC-0100 California Independent System Operator Transmission Yes Richard Vine WECC-0100 Platte River Power Authority System Coordination Yes John Collins WECC-0100 Tri-State Generation & Transmission (Reliability) System Coordination Yes Tracy Sliman WECC-0100 Tri-State Generation & Transmission (Reliability) Transmission Yes Tracy Sliman WECC-0100 Platte River Power Authority Transmission Yes Jeff Landis WECC-0100 Platte River Power Authority Generation Yes Tyson Archie
WECC-0100 Seattle City Light Distribution Yes Dana Wheelock WECC-0100 Western Area Power Administration - Rocky Mountain Region Transmission Yes James Hirning WECC-0100 Tacoma Power Generation Yes Karen Hedlund WECC-0100 Tacoma Power Marketers and Brokers Yes Todd Lloyd WECC-0100 Puget Sound Energy, Inc. Marketers and Brokers Yes Andrea Basinski WECC-0100 Seattle City Light Transmission Yes Hao Li WECC-0100 Seattle City Light Marketers and Brokers Yes Charles Freeman WECC-0100 Puget Sound Energy, Inc. System Coordination Yes Theresa Rakowsky WECC-0100 Puget Sound Energy, Inc. Distribution Yes Theresa Rakowsky WECC-0100 Puget Sound Energy, Inc. Transmission Yes Theresa Rakowsky WECC-0100 Southern California Edison Company (Transmission & Distribution) Distribution Yes Steven Mavis WECC-0100 Southern California Edison Company (Transmission & Distribution) Transmission Yes Steven Mavis WECC-0100 Powerex, Inc. Marketers and Brokers Yes Gordon WECC-0100 Flynn Resource Consultants, Inc. Other WECC Members and Participating Stakeholders Yes Robert Jenkins WECC-0100 British Columbia Hydro & Power Authority (aka BC Hydro) Generation Yes Helen Hamilton Harding WECC-0100 Tacoma Power System Coordination Yes Joseph Wilson WECC-0100 Tacoma Power Transmission Yes Joseph Wilson
WECC-0100 British Columbia Hydro & Power Authority (aka BC Hydro) System Coordination Yes Patricia Robertson WECC-0100 British Columbia Hydro & Power Authority (aka BC Hydro) Transmission Yes Patricia Robertson WECC-0100 Colorado Springs Utilities Generation Yes Shawna Speer WECC-0100 Colorado Springs Utilities Distribution Yes Shawna Speer WECC-0100 Colorado Springs Utilities System Coordination Yes Shawna Speer WECC-0100 Colorado Springs Utilities Transmission Yes Shawna Speer WECC-0100 Puget Sound Energy, Inc. Generation Yes Lynda Kupfer WECC-0100 British Columbia Hydro & Power Authority (aka BC Hydro) Distribution Yes Amjadi Faramarz