If no, is there an elective course that is listed on your Preferred Program Pathway Template where Cultural Diversity & Global Citizenship could be assessed for mastery? Yes No If yes, please list the course: If no, is there another elective course that is an option in your program curriculum where Cultural Diversity & Global Citizenship could be assessed for mastery? Yes No If yes, please list the course: If no, where do students master Cultural Diversity & Global Citizenship in your program? Do you need assistance incorporating this General Education outcome into your degree program? NOTE THAT WILL NEED TO BE AT LEAST ONE EXAM / ASSIGNMENT / ACTIVITY IN THIS COURSE THAT CAN BE USED TO ASSESS MASTERY OF THE COMPETENCY. YOU MAY ALSO SUBMIT ASSESSMENT RESULTS FOR THIS GENERAL EDUCATION COMPETENCY IF YOU HAVE THEM, BUT IT WILL BE CONSIDERED OPTIONAL. Mechanical Engineering Technology Program Outcomes To which course(s) is this program outcome related? Year assessed or to be assessed. Assessment Methods Used What were the assessment results? (Please provide brief summary data) Use mathematical and scientific skills to analyze product properties including form, function, fit, strength, thermal and fluid properties, etc. MET1111 MET1161 MET1231 MET1241 MET1281 MET1301 MET2151 MET2201 MET2251 2014-15 Assessment of capstone. Strength of Materials Highway sign project and presentation. Feedback from industry led advisory board members showed favorable opinions of the educational achievements of capstone students. 2016: 70% of the students successfully determined wind and loads using fluid dynamic equations utilizing local/federal codes, calculated
MET2301 MET2351 MET2401 MET2780 CAM1109 maximum principal stresses and location where it occurred, and used the maximum stresses to design appropriate supporting structures and cross-sectional geometries. Recognize professional ethical and societal responsibilities, respect diversity and demonstrate a commitment to life-long learning. MET1231 MET1281 MET2711 MET2780 2015 Challenger case and KC Skywalk case w/ written rubrics for Professionalism NSPE Ethics quiz for ethical responsibilities Diversity, Risky Tank case w/written rubric Trademark Copyright Case 2016: Challenger Case: Average score: 91.1% (spring) 100% (fall) Students achieving 70% threshold: 90% (spring) 100% (fall) KC Skywalk Case: Average score: 81.3% (spring) 82% (fall) Students achieving 70% threshold: 90% (spring) 100% (fall) NSPE Ethics Quiz Average score: 82.6% (spring) 84% (fall) Students achieving 70% threshold: 91% (spring) 100% (fall) Risky Tank (Diversity: Average 72.4% (spring) 91.2% (fall) Students achieving 70% threshold: 64% (spring) 100% (fall) The FTF section had 100% successful completion.
In the online section 70% of the students successfully completed the assignment. Design in detail individual parts from functional sketches provided by an engineer, and model them using a three-dimensional parametric modeler. (i.e. 3-D CAD) MET1231 MET1281 MET2711 MET2780 2015-16 Assessment of capstone. Graduate exit interviews. Employer surveys. Co-op feedback. Solidworks Technical Report Advisory board members had favorable evaluations of students. The department was able to secure capital funding to purchase a newer 3D printer. Additional curriculum is being designed to utilize its advanced features. 2016: 70% of the students successfully complete the Assignment Students met the assessment with a 70% completion average. 70% of the capstone students successfully complete the tasks listed under “Description of Points Assessed”. As an interdisciplinary team member, develop products, processes, solve problems, perform project planning, prepare time estimates and make sound ethical decisions. MET1231 MET1241 MET1301 MET2780 2015-2016 Assessment of capstone. Graduate exit interviews. Employer surveys. Co-op feedback. Strength of Materials Highway Sign Project Advisory board members had favorable evaluations of students. Students in the capstone course have worked with outside industry partners. Evaluations from those partners were also favorable. Exit interviews indicate that students liked working with industry partners on real projects. 2016: 70% of the students successfully evaluated codes,
established design objectives, designed the appropriate supporting structure, and evaluated their design for safety by calculating safety factors in a team environment. 70% of the students successfully complete the tasks listed under “Description of Points Assessed”. Communicate effectively orally, in writing and graphically on an interdisciplinary team as a design technician using appropriate tools MET1231 MET1241 MET1281 MET2711 MET2780 2015 Oral communication: real-world ethics case presentation graded by rubric Written communication, final case graded by rubric Strength of Materials Highway Sign Project ethics case oral presentation: Average score: 87.6% (spring) 95.3% (fall) Students achieving 70% threshold: 91% (spring) 100% (fall) Final ethics case: Average score: 84% (spring) 88.2% (fall) Students achieving 91% threshold: 100% (spring) 100% (fall) 2016: 70% of the students successfully communicated their results and calculation during the semester and at the end of the semester using CAD models, Power Point presentations, tables and graphs using Excel, and written reports. Document the product/process model using appropriate means (multi-view drawings, pictorials, catalog/manual illustrations, charts/graphs, shaded image, animation, etc.) MET1231 MET1241 MET1281 MET1301 MET2780 2013-14 Locally developed tests and quizzes. Lab observations. Candy Dispenser Project Students have a low rate of injury in the lab. Student to teacher ratios are kept to a manageable number. 2016: The FTF section had 80% successful completion of a 70% or better score on the project. In the online section 66% of the students successfully completed the