Umm, You’re Eating My Trash! Composting Design Challenges Rubric Expert Advanced Emerging Not Evident Engineering Design Process with a team, student performs in-depth inferences and applications that go beyond the challenge parameters for testing a chosen design; constructing a compost bin prototype; designing and conducting experimentation regarding the compostability of packaging materials. Along with a team, student meets challenge parameters for testing a chosen design; constructing a compost bin prototype; designing and conducting experimentation regarding the compostability of packaging materials. Along with a team, student meets simpler details of the challenge parameters for testing a chosen design; constructing a compost bin prototype; designing and conducting experimentation regarding the compostability of packaging materials. However, student exhibits major errors or omissions regarding more complex ideas and processes. Along with a team and extra help, student partially meets simpler details of the challenge parameters for testing a chosen design; constructing a compost bin prototype; designing and conducting experimentation regarding the compostability of packaging materials. Student exhibits major errors or omissions regarding more complex ideas and processes.; Decision Analysis Matrix with the team, student fully utilizes the Decision Analysis Matrix by identifying at least 6 goals and rankings for use in design selection. Team scores and calculates each proposal in order to come to a consensus about the best design choice. Final design is drawn; Along with the team, student fully utilizes the Decision Analysis Matrix by identifying at least 5 goals and rankings for use in prototype design selection. Team scores and calculates each proposal in order to come to a consensus about the best design choice. Final design is drawn Along with the team, student utilizes the Decision Analysis Matrix by identifying 3 to 4 goals and rankings for use in design selection. Team scores and calculates each proposal in order to come to a consensus about the best design choice. Final design is partially drawn Along with the team, student utilizes the Decision Analysis Matrix by identifying fewer than 3 goals and rankings for use in design selection; OR, team does not properly score and calculate each proposal in order to come to a consensus about the best design choice. Final design is not drawn
Experimental Data Data table and graphs properly display evidence of correctly recording and analyzing both quantitative and qualitative data regarding compost. Results are summarized and prove effectiveness of fairly testing compostability of packaging. Experiment is repeatable. Data table is used, but graphs properly display evidence of correctly recording and analyzing either quantitative OR qualitative data regarding compost. Results are summarized, but do NOT prove effectiveness of fairly testing compostability of packaging. Experiment is repeatable. Data table and graphs display evidence of incorrectly recording and analyzing quantitative and qualitative data regarding compost. Results are summarized, but do NOT prove effectiveness of fairly testing compostability of packaging. Repeating experiment would require additional information from designers. No data table and graphs display evidence of incorrectly recording and analyzing quantitative and qualitative data regarding compost. Results are not summarized, and do NOT prove effectiveness of fairly testing compostability of packaging. Repeating experiment would require new information from designers. Reflection At least 3 areas of success and 3 areas of failure in design process are fully analyzed and explained, and at least 4 suggestions for further meeting or exceeding constraints in the future are communicated. At least 2 areas of success and 2 areas of failure in filtration design are fully analyzed and explained, and at least 4 suggestions for further meeting or exceeding constraints in the future are communicated. At least 1 area of success and 1 area of failure in prototype design are fully analyzed and explained, and at least 2 suggestions for further meeting or exceeding constraints in the future are communicated. 1 area of success OR failure in prototype design is analyzed OR explained, and fewer than 2 suggestions for further meeting or exceeding constraints in the future are communicated. Name: _____________________________ Date: _____________ Period: ____ Umm, You’re Eating My Trash! Persuasive Business Letter Rubric