Communicate information, arguments and analyses accurately and reliably, orally and in writing to a range of audiences. 5. Awareness of Limits of Knowledge Understand limits to own knowledge, appreciate uncertainty, and how this influence their analyses and interpretations. 5a 5b … 6. Autonomy and Professional Capacity Qualities and transferrable skills for further use: exercise of initiative, personal responsibility and accountability working effectively with others decision-making in complex contexts ability to manage learning within and outside discipline behaviour consistent with academic integrity and social responsibility. 6a 6b … 7. Other Include any program outcomes that may not be covered by the 6 DLES listed above 7a 7b … Table 3.1b: Master’s Degree – Mapping Program Outcomes to Degree Level Expectations Program: University GDLEs A graduate of Brock University will be able to demonstrate: Faculty specific GDLES A graduate of the Faculty of ?? will be able to demonstrate: Program Outcomes aligned with GDLES At the end of this program, the successful student will be able to demonstrate: Depth and Breadth of Knowledge A systematic understanding of knowledge, including, appropriate, relevant knowledge outside the field and/or discipline, and a critical awareness of current problems and/or new INSERT FACULTY LEVEL DEGREE LEVEL EXPECTATIONS IN THIS COLUMN INSERT PROGRAM LEVEL LEARNING OUTCOMES Examples include: 1a The ability to describe concepts, principles, and overarching themes in the discipline
The intellectual independence required for continuing professional development The ethical behaviour consistent with academic integrity and the use of appropriate guidelines and procedures for responsible conduct of research The ability to appreciate the broader implications of applying knowledge to particular contexts. 5. Level of communications skills The ability to communicate ideas, issues and conclusions clearly. 5a 5b … 6. Awareness of the limits of knowledge Cognizance of the complexity of knowledge and of the potential contributions of other interpretations, methods, and disciplines. 6a 6b … Table 3.1c: Doctoral Degree – Mapping Program Outcomes to Degree Level Expectations Program: Brock University GDLEs A graduate of Brock University will be able to demonstrate: Faculty specific GDLES A graduate of the Faculty of ?? will be able to demonstrate: Program Outcomes aligned with GDLES At the end of this program, the successful student will be able to demonstrate: and Breadth of Knowledge A thorough understanding of a substantial body of knowledge that is at the forefront of their academic discipline or area of professional practice including, where appropriate, relevant knowledge outside the field and/or discipline. INSERT FACULTY LEVEL DEGREE LEVEL EXPECTATIONS IN THIS COLUMN INSERT PROGRAM LEVEL LEARNING OUTCOMES Examples include: 1a The ability to describe concepts, principles, and overarching themes in the discipline 1b The ability to develop a working knowledge of the discipline’s content domains 1c The ability to explain complex behavior by integrating concepts developed from different content domains 1d The ability to interpret, design, and conduct basic disciplinary research
learning from outside discipline 2. Knowledge of Methodologies Apply methods of inquiry to: evaluate different approaches use these methods to devise and sustain arguments or solve problems comment on current research or advanced scholarship 2a 2b … 3. Application of Knowledge Review, present and interpret information in order to: develop lines of argument make sound judgements apply underlying concepts, principles use the knowledge in the creative process Use techniques to: critically evaluate propose solutions frame appropriate questions solve a problem or create new work make critical use of scholarly sources 3a 3b … 4. Communication skills Communicate accurately and reliably, orally and in writing to a range of audiences. 4a 4b … 5. Awareness of Limits of Knowledge Understand limits to own knowledge and how this might influence 5a 5b …
their analyses and interpretations. 6. Autonomy and Professional Capacity Qualities and transferrable skills for further use: exercise of initiative, personal responsibility and accountability working effectively with others decision-making in complex contexts ability to manage learning within and outside discipline behaviour consistent with academic integrity and social responsibility 6a 6b … 7. Other Include any program outcomes that may not be covered by the 6 DLES listed above 3.2b: Master’s Degree – Mapping Program Learning Outcomes to Modes of Delivery and Methods of Assessment Program: Brock University GDLEs A graduate of Brock University will be able to demonstrate: Program GDLES/Learning Outcomes A the end of this program, the successful student will: Modes of Delivery Assessment Methods Students can demonstrate knowledge/ are assessed through the following methods: and Breadth of Knowledge A systematic understanding of knowledge, including, where appropriate, relevant knowledge INSERT PROGRAM LEVEL LEARNING OUTCOMES IDENTIFIED IN TABLE 3.1 1a 1b INSERT THE VARIOUS OF DELIVERY, IDENTIFIED IN THE COURSE OUTLINES, WHERE THE SPECIFIC PROGRAM INSERT THE METHODS OF ASSESSMENT, IDENTIFED IN THE COURSE OUTLINES, USED TO TEST
outside the field and/or discipline, and a critical awareness of current problems and/or new insights, much of which is at, or informed by, the forefront of their academic discipline, field of study, or area of professional practice. … LEARNING OUTCOME IS ADDRESSED, Examples include: Lectures Laboratories Seminars Tutorial Assignments Projects ATTAINMENT OF THE PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOME Examples include: 1. Test or Quiz 2. Mid-Term 3. Exam 4. Seminar Participation 5. Research Essays 6. Document Studies 7. Book Reviews Research and Scholarship A conceptual understanding and methodological competence that: enables a working comprehension of how established techniques of research or enquiry are used to create and interpret knowledge in the discipline; enables a critical evaluation of current research and advanced research and scholarship in the discipline or area of professional competence; enables a treatment of complex issues and judgments based on established principles and techniques. On the basis of that competence, has shown at least one of the following: the development and support of a sustained argument in written form 2a 2b …
interpretations, methods, and disciplines. Table 3.2c: Doctoral Degree – Mapping Program Outcomes to Modes of Delivery and Methods of Assessment Program: Brock University GDLEs A graduate of Brock University will be able to demonstrate: Program GDLES/Learning Outcomes A the end of this program, the successful student will: Modes of Delivery Assessment Methods Students can demonstrate knowledge/ are assessed through the following methods: Depth and Breadth of Knowledge A thorough understanding of a substantial body of knowledge that is at the forefront of their academic discipline or area of professional practice including, where appropriate, relevant knowledge outside the field and/or discipline. INSERT PROGRAM LEVEL LEARNING OUTCOMES IDENTIFIED IN TABLE 3.1 1a 1b … INSERT THE VARIOUS MODES OF DELIVERY, IDENTIFIED IN THE COURSE OUTLINES, WHERE THE SPECIFIC PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOME IS ADDRESSED, Examples include: Lectures Laboratories Seminars Tutorial Assignments Projects INSERT THE METHODS OF ASSESSMENT, IDENTIFED IN THE COURSE OUTLINES, USED TO TEST ATTAINMENT OF THE PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOME Examples include: 1. Test or Quiz 2. Mid-Term 3. Exam 4. Seminar Participation 5. Research Essays 6. Document Studies 7. Book Reviews Research and Scholarship the ability to conceptualize, design, and implement research for the generation of new knowledge, applications, or understanding at the forefront of the discipline, and to adjust 2a 2b …
Instructor Name Academic year Program Undergraduate Graduate Core or Participating Undergraduate Thesis Major Research Paper Graduate Thesis – Masters Graduate Thesis – Doctoral Grad Committee Member Post-Doctoral Fellow 16/17 Political Sciences 1.0 0.5 C 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sabbatical Insert or remove rows as necessary Table 5.3: Intellectual Contributions (Past Eight Years)
Faculty Name A. Publication of books and monographs B. Contributions to edited C. Papers in peer refereed journals D. Peer reviewed abstracts E. Papers delivered at conferences and professional meetings F. Contributions to panels, workshops, and clinics G. Invited Presentations H. Consulting (government, related professionals and agencies) I. Preparation of instructional, clinical, curriculum or policy materials for such agencies J. Editorial and refereeing duties K. Creation, performance, direction, programming, design and staging of creative works for the public L. Curation of juried exhibitions M. Festivals and competitions adjudicated, master classes offered N. Professional residencies O. Development of software, hardware or equipment P. Scholarly contributions to pedagogy Q. Other scholarly contributions to agencies, communities, governments or organizations R. Other publications (non-refereed) with significant public impact Insert or remove rows as necessary Table 5.4: Contributions by Instructors from Other Programs (Current + past four years) Year Other Unit Courses Supervisions
Instructor Name Academic year Other Program Undergraduate Graduate Core or Participating Undergraduate Thesis Major Research Paper Graduate Thesis – Masters Graduate Thesis – Doctoral Grad Committee Member Post-Doctoral Fellow Comments Smith 16/17 Political Sciences 1.0 0.5 C 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sabbatical Insert or remove rows as necessary
Table 3.3 – Curriculum Map Appendix A – Course level Learning Outcomes NOTE: Insert and complete copies of the following table for each course in the program. Table A.1: Course Level Learning Outcomes Course: Course Calendar Description: Learning Outcome A student will be able to: Learning Activity/Experience A student will learn this by: Assessment Achievement of this outcome will be demonstrated by: Strategy for Improvement Insert or remove rows as needed