Cost by Component Transition Fund (USD) Country (USD) (USD) Total (USD) Component 1: Development and implementation of a statistically profiling model and a skills matching solution 1 150,000 62,000 Component 2: Capacity building and project management 1 250,000 66,000 Contingency costs (2.5%) 60,000 60,000 Total Project Cost 2,460,000 128,000 2,588,000 Budget Breakdown of Indirect Costs Requested (USD) Descriptionenditure Cative)atives and activities.C step and RVP instead of Board approval. g. nes: these conditions have been m Amount (USD) For grant preparation, administration and implementation support: Staff time 70,000 Staff travel 30,000 Indirect Costs 100,000 The USD 100,000 amount for the indirect costs have been already transferred to the Bank under the previous project.
Intermediate Result indicator nine: Number of ANETI’s staff who develop expertise in identifying the skills of job seekers and to analyze the compatibility between applicants' profiles and job offers Number 0 0 55 55 NA NA Annual Project Reports PIU + Steering committee Number of ANETI’s staff who develop expertise in identifying the skills of job seekers and to analyze the compatibility between applicants' profiles and job offers Intermediate Result (Component Two): Capacity building and project management Intermediate Result indicator One: Feasibility study that defines the technical, legal and financial aspects for the creation of a national platform/agency for the promotion of entrepreneurship and for the development of the social and solidarity Report 0 0 1 NA NA NA Once Study report PIU + Steering committee Feasibility study that defines the technical, legal and financial aspects for the creation of a national platform/agency for the promotion of entrepreneurship and for the development of the social and solidarity Intermediate Result indicator Two: Number of trained advisors, coaches and referent trainers Number 0 0 200 NA NA NA Once Project Reports PIU + Steering committee Number of trained advisors, coaches and referent trainers Intermediate Result indicator Three: Number of Government bodies, institutions and local government units which receive support services from the project Number 0 3 5 N/A N/A N/A Annual Project Reports PIU + Steering committee Number of Government bodies, institutions and local government units that directly benefit from the project investment. Intermediate Result indicator four: A diagnosis report of the current situation in terms of monitoring and evaluation and in terms of performance management Report 0 NA 1 NA NA NA Once Diagnostic report PIU + Steering committee A diagnosis report of the current situation in terms of monitoring and evaluation and in terms of performance management is validated Intermediate Result indicator Five: A monitoring and evaluation system is set up for policies, programs and projects Operational system 0 0 1 NA NA NA Once Project Reports PIU + Steering committee A Monitoring and evaluation system developed and implemented Intermediate Result indicator six: A performance management and contracting system is implemented Operational system 0 0 1 NA NA NA Once Project Reports PIU + Steering committee A performance management and contracting system is implemented
Intermediate Result indicator seven: Number of workshops and validation seminars organized Events 0 5 5 5 NA NA Annual Project Reports PIU + Steering committee Number of workshops and validation seminars organized Intermediate Result indicator Quarterly M&E report Report 0 4 4 4 NA NA Quarterly Project Reports PIU + Steering committee Quarterly M&E report produced Intermediate Result indicator nine: Annual auditing report Report 0 0 1 1 NA NA Annual Auditing report PIU + Steering committee Annually auditing report produced