SR-65 to the Junction with sidewalk cafes Baseline Ave. minor signalize, No crosswalks & sidewalks SR-175 minor Grade separated, signalize, Yes crosswalks & sidewalks F Junction with to Milliken Ave. No Yes <4 ft. 30 ft. Few obstacles No Interchange 2 G Milliken Ave. to Junction with No No 30 ft. Many obstacles. 100 SR-99 major Ped/Bike Over/Undercrossing No Action: Complete the data and include a narrative summarizing the facility, opportunities for improvement, and any related issues or projects. In addition to the data table, provide a short narrative (≈1 paragraph) that summarizes the facility, context of the facility, opportunities for improvement (improvements that expand transit capacity, improve transit speeds, and encourage mode shift from car to transit, etc.), and any related issues (gaps, barriers, challenges, accessibility of bicycles or pedestrians etc.), or projects. If the same information applies for multiple segments, it is ok to list the segment numbers in the same segment field to avoid having the data repeat.
Coordinate with District Inter-Governmental Review staff. Consult published sources, including the Freight Element of the State Rail Plan, state and local goods movement plans, goods movement sections of RTPs and other regional plans and studies (e.g., those issued by the MPO or RTPA), and local (County and City) General Plans and zoning (e.g., for transportation and circulation elements and for lands designated for warehousing uses). online information generated by DOTP Office of System and Freight Planning, FHWA (e.g., http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/otps/bottlenecks/), FAA, and FRA. Facility Type/Freight Generator Location Mode Name Commodity/ Industry Comments/Issues Port [Location] Ship, Rail, truck POLA/LB Electronics, Manufactured Products, Agriculture - Environmental constraints - Air Quality Intermodal Freight Facility [Location] Rail Hobart Yard Electronics, Manufactured Products, Agriculture Rail yard [Location] Rail Maersk Rail Yard Electronics, Manufactured Products, Agriculture Rail Line [Location] Rail Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway (BNSF) (Class I) Electronics, Manufactured Products, Agriculture - Grade-crossing @ R0.987, 1.045, 1.734 Rail Line [Location] Rail Union Pacific (UP) (Class I) Electronics, Manufactured Products, Agriculture Air Airport [Location] Airplane LAX Agriculture Highway [Location] Truck I-10 (National Network) Agriculture -Bottleneck at Central St. VMT predicted to double -Potential for dedicated Truck Lane -Weigh-in-motion located @ 1.538 Freight Generator [Location] Truck Manufacturing District Food Action:
Fish Passage: Identify if there are known fish passageway barriers along the route or if there is potential to impede fish passageways during future development. Although it is highly recommended to contact the fish passage coordinator, one possible way to assess the potential of impediment is to use the Hydrography (500K) layer found in the CalFish Fish Passage Database and identify areas in which the State Route crosses the water feature. If a smaller scale analysis is wanted, it is suggested to use either the Hydrography (100K) layer in CalFish or the Hydrography Features - General layer in the 31. Sources: (California Fish Passage Assessment Database layer and Hydrography (500K) layer or (100K) layer), Contact Fish Passage Coordinator Habitat Connectivity: Identify wildlife crossings and know if the segment runs through an Essential Connectivity Area and consider the potential impacts on habitat connectivity. Sources: California Department of Fish and Game, 57 (Essential Connectivity Area data , , Regional or local assessments (where available), Narrative and Concept Integration: Include a concise narrative that summarizes environmental conditions found along the corridor route. If a readily available source, like an RTP, has identified potential conservation areas or indicated a lack of potential areas, it should be mentioned in the narrative. Include a summary of methods used to identify known environmental resources in the area. Use the information gathered to consider possible corridor development constraints. Use the possible constraints while formulating the concept rationale. If applicable, identify potential solutions for corridor development constraints in the Corridor Concept section of the template. The level of complexity can remain simple and broad. The consideration of possible solutions can help obtain streamlining benefits during project delivery and can help link planning with CEQA/NEPA requirements and analysis. General Sources: S g Section 4(f) Land Coastal Zone Farmland/ Timberland Env. Justice Cultural Resources Visual Aesthetics Geology/Soils/ Seismic Floodplain Climate Change and Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Hazardous Materials Naturally Occurring Asbestos Air Quality Noise Waters and Wetlands Wild and Scenic Rivers Special Status Species Fish Passage Habitat Connectivity Ozone PM CO 2.5 10 1 High No High Low Med Low Low N/A N/A Low Low Attainment/Unclassified Non-Attainment Non-Attainment Attainment/Maintenance Low Med N/A Low N/A Med 2 Med 100 yr. High High 3 Med High Med High 4 N/A High N/A N/A 5 Med Med 6 Med Low Med 7 Low Low Low Low Med High Med Med Low
Bottleneck Existing Yes Bottleneck Location SR-128 and Junction Bottleneck Queue (length) 3 miles Bottleneck Causality Merging traffic Peak Hour Traffic Data Peak Period Length 1 Peak Hour Direction N/A Peak Hour Time of Day am Peak Hour Directional Split (BY) 70/30 Peak Hour Directional Split (HY) 80/20 Peak Hour VMT (BY) 10000 Peak Hour VMT (HY) 20000 Peak Hour V/C (BY) 1 Peak Hour V/C (HY) 1 Peak Hour Avg. (mph)(BY) 30 Peak Hour Avg. Speed (mph)(HY) 25 Peak Hour Vehicle of Delay (35 mph) (BY) 100 Peak Hour Vehicle Hours of Delay (35 mph) (HY) 140 Peak Hour VHD (35 MPH) Method PeMS Peak Hour Vehicle Hours of Delay (60 mph) (BY) N/A Peak Hour Vehicle Hours of Delay (60 mph) (HY) N/A Peak Hour VHD (60 MPH) Method N/A Managed Lane Performance AADT (BY) 200 AADT (HY) 400 AADT Method LOS Method HCS LOS (BY) B LOS (HY) C LOS Concept C VMT (BY) 500 VMT (HY) 1000 Daily Vehicle Hours of Delay (35 MPH)(BY) N/A Daily Vehicle Hours of Delay (35 MPH)(HY) N/A