All capacities will be treated as provisional until HRAS and drainage infrastructure assessment has been carried out… strategies put in place. Mitigation strategies should be informed by bat survey evidence using standards set out in the 2010 South Hams SAC Guidance. AM20 SS3 No representations AM21 4.1.36 Paignton Neighbourhood Forum (704914) Presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply for developments requiring appropriate assessment under the HRA. NPPF119 CFonsider that this is already addressed in AM21. Add footnote 9 “and paragraph 119” of the NPPF AM22 4.2.20 No representations AM23 SS5 Paignton Neighbourhood Forum (704914) Add that subsidisation should see to achieve net job growth in accordance with Policy SS1. See Schedule of comments on the Main Modifications, with reference to Paignton Neighbourhood Forum’s desirte for a more jobs led Plan. However it would be difficult to implement the suggested amendment to MM5 AM24 4.2.26 No representations AM25 4.2.27 No representations AM26 4.3.17 No representations AM27 4.3.18 No representations AM28 4.3.23 No representations AM29 SS7 Natural England (400188) Object that HRA has identified additional recreational pressure on Head. Object to using s106 Obligations to deal with this due to pooling restrictions. Should be addressed through CIL and treated as critical infrastructure. This matter was the subject of detailed discussions with Natural England at the Proposed Modifications stage. The Council considers that the Changes at AM30, AM43 AM77 and AM121 address the
W5 Paignton Neighbourhood Forum (704914) Natural England (400188) Natural England: object that additional sites identified in MM9/MM14 may have additional impact on Hope Nose CSO with consequent impact on SAC. Paignton Neighbourhood Forum: Request additional text in W5: “Where there is reason to believe there is a problem of sewer capacity available to receive the development proposed, applications for approval will be required to provide evidence of surveys undertaken and that demonstrate sufficient capacity exists at the time the application is first made for approval of the development proposed, and will not be left until a later stage of consideration through the application of conditional approval.” Natural England’s Support to changes to W5 are Their concerns relate to additional housing in the Main Modifications. See schedule of representations to the Main Modifications. Paignton Neighbourhood Forum: Additional text at AM170 has sought to require details of how waste water will be dealt with at application stage. Amend AM170/Par6.5.3.26 as follows: ...all planning applications should be supported by details of how the proposed development will be drained and waste water dealt with, without risking additional combined sewer overspills or other harm to the sewerage system. Such details, and details of mitigation measures will be required at application stage, and not left to consideration through conditional approval. Details should be proportionate to the scale of the proposal. AM168 6.5.3.25 No representations
6.5.3.26 Paignton Neighbourhood Forum (704914) Expand text on AECOM Sewer capacity Study: "The Council, in partnership with South West Water commissioned the Assessment of Future Sewer Capacity in Torbay ( AECOM 2014) to consider the deliverability of the Torbay Local Plan within Torbay’s sewer capacity. This confirms that the Local Plan is deliverable within the strategic sewer network’s capacity if the assumptions made in the report prove to be correct, that: • use of water by households will reduce significantly; •climate change and ‘urban creep’ from loss of soft surfaces does not increase run off into existing sewers; •a robust means is achieved by the council of extracting existing surface water from combined sewers serving the area. paragraph 6.5.3.26 as follows: The Council, in partnership with South West Water commissioned the Assessment of Future Sewer Capacity in Torbay ( AECOM 2014) to consider the deliverability of the Torbay Local Plan within Torbay’s sewer capacity. This confirms that the Local Plan is deliverable within the strategic sewer network’s capacity. However the Study requires water efficiency measures, and reduction in water run off from urban creep to be achieved. Consequently new development should have separate foul and storm water drainage systems. In addition Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUDs) and Sustainable Urban Drainage (SuDs) are recommended to reduce the impact of climate change and urban creep (hardstandings etc)….