descriptions of each component and its function Sketch includes directional elements (arrows) showing paths from satellite to receiver Sketch includes at least one source of error, such as multi-pathing Good articulation of GNSS applications to science and society. detail or are incorrect, showing a lack of comprehension. incorrect, showing a lack of comprehension. 10 pts 3: Write-Up or Discussion 9–10 points: The discussion is well written and includes all of the following components: Justification of survey design Challenges and solutions Discussion of the results Answers all of the reflection questions. Thoughtful discussion of how to improve on survey design. 5–8 points: The discussion is moderately well written and includes all of the components OR The discussion is well written but weak in 1–2 components or fails to answer some of the questions. Discussion on future improvements is sparse. Improvement is always possible! 0–4 points: The discussion is poorly written and missing several components AND/OR The discussion fails to address more than 2 critical components or fails to answer questions completely. 10 pts 4: Write-Up or Discussion 9–10 points: The discussion is well written and includes all of the following components: Justification of survey design Challenges and future solutions Discussion of future map and discernable changes is correct Two good examples of societal benefits of GPS-derived topography Should answer all of the 5–8 points: The discussion is moderately well written and includes all of the components OR The discussion is well written but missing 1–2 components or fails to answer some of the questions. 0–4 points: The discussion is poorly written and missing several components AND/OR The discussion fails to discuss more than 2 critical components or fails to answer questions.
questions. 10 pts 5–6: Figures and Final Report 9–10 points: A well-written summary that accurately assesses the survey design, potential errors, interpretation of results, and discussion of broader impact of technique. Societal benefit is clearly articulated using nontechnical language. Figures and/or map is well designed and contains all requested components. It illustrates the change detected and associated uncertainty. A map should minimally include station locations, base station, and some indicator of the change detected. Student identifies that reporting potential error and impact of your statement must be stated clearly to reduce unnecessary concern. 5–8 points: Missing 1–2 of the listed characteristics for an exemplary report and may be poorly written/unclear. Societal benefit is listed but not clearly justified. AND/OR All characteristics are present but lack detail or are incorrect, showing a lack of comprehension. 0–4 points: Missing 2–4 of the characteristics, may be poorly written and unclear; AND/OR Most characteristics are present (1–2 missing) but are incorrect, showing a lack of comprehension. 10 pts 7: Figures and Final Report 9–10 points: A well-written summary that accurately assesses the survey design, potential errors, interpretation of results, and discussion of broader impact of technique. Societal benefit is clearly articulated using nontechnical language. Plots are well designed and contains all 5–8 points: Missing 1–2 of the listed characteristics for an exemplary report and may be poorly written/unclear. Societal benefit is listed but not clearly justified. AND/OR All characteristics are present but lack detail or are incorrect, showing a lack 0–4 points: Missing 2–4 of the characteristics, may be poorly written and unclear; AND/OR Most characteristics are present (1–2 missing) but are incorrect, showing a lack of