Support the Government in responding to the assessed humanitarian and protection needs of the affected people and related capacity-building efforts Indicator Target Monitoring method Number of assessments conducted in host and return communities and displacement sites 12 (monthly) in host and return sites; 24 (bi-monthly) in displacement sites CCCM Cluster DTM and Site Window reports Number of families receiving NFI kits and packages 10,460 NFI kits, 4,180 shelter kits CCCM Cluster Number of LGUs with functional DRRMC and DRRM structures 70 ER Cluster Proportion of teachers, day care workers and TLS/community volunteers in identified learning institutions trained on ECCDiE, EiE and psycho-social care and support 70 Education Cluster Number of beneficiaries reached through FFW and FFT 219,000 people (197,015 FFW and 21,985 FFT) FSA Cluster Proportion of pregnant and lactating women served through RH medical 90% RH working group reports Number of malnourished children receiving nutrition interventions 8,500 (1,500 therapeutic feeding for SAM, 7,000 supplementary feeding for MAM) Nutrition Cluster Number of municipalities where protection monitoring is conducted 33 Protection Cluster Proportion of GBV survivors reported to GBV sub-cluster facilitated with timely and appropriate access to services/interventions 100% GBV sub-cluster Proportion of CP cases receiving an adequate response 95% CPWG Proportion of targeted beneficiaries with access to adequate supply of safe water (15L per person per day) (21,721 women, 17,990 men and 27,162 children) WASH Cluster Proportion of communal facilities constructed based on best practices 100% CCCM Cluster Number of affected families provided with non-farm livelihood packages 21,000 ER Cluster Number of return/relocation sites declared as zones of peace 42 (60% out of 70 selected barangays) ER Cluster Number of return/relocation sites in which ‘value-addition’ and backward/forward integration established 70 (35 IP sites; 35 IDP sites) ER Cluster Strategic objective 2 Support government efforts to assist affected people in recovery, whether they have
Number of GCRVs and other CP concerns monitored and reported 420 Number of local level monitoring and reporting mechanisms in place for GBV and CP (including family tracing and reunification) 50 Extension of UN-MILF Action Plan agreed and signed Completed Number of GBV cases reported to GBV sub-cluster through the use of Protection Incident Report Forms 50 Functional GBV database established for documentation, referral and follow-up Completed Cluster objective 2 Respond to cases of human rights violations (including cases involving women, children, youth and indigenous peoples) through advocacy, referrals and legal remedies Output Indicator 2013 target Number of municipalities where reported human rights violations were responded to 15 Number of CP cases responded to 280 Proportion of CP cases receiving an appropriate response 95% Number of localised CP IEC materials distributed and used in community education sessions 10,000 copies Number of information sessions conducted in the communities 70 (1 session per barangay) Proportion of separated, unaccompanied and orphaned children reunited with families and given follow-up support and referred to appropriate agencies 100% Proportion of GBV survivors reported to GBV sub-cluster facilitated with timely and appropriate access to multi-sectoral services/interventions 100% Number of communities with functional GBV referral mechanisms 10 Cluster objective 3 Strengthen protection within communities through the implementation of community-based, gender-responsive, age-appropriate and culture-sensitive mechanisms and promotion of human rights capacity-building and awareness-raising for key stakeholders (including government, armed groups, humanitarian agencies and community members). Output Indicator 2013 target Number of organisations receiving awareness-raising, capacity-building initiatives 20 Number of BCPCs reactivated/organised and functional 56 Number of CBCPN organised, functional and linked to BCPC 56 Number of people capacitated/trained on human rights, CP, GBV 1,500 Number of service providers, community leaders and humanitarian workers capacitated on survivor-centred GBV prevention and response 20 per barangay/village Number of information sessions conducted per barangay 1 Cluster objective 4 Ensure access by affected populations to basic social services and assistance to support communities in rebuilding their lives Output Indicator 2013 target Number of municipalities where community-based projects are implemented 15
I: Table IV: List of Appeal projects (grouped by sector) Humanitarian Action Plan for the Philippines (Mindanao) 2013 as of 15 November 2012 Project code (click on hyperlinked project code to open full project details) Title Appealing agency Requirements ($) Priority CCCM Ensuring Support for the Humanitarian and Resiliency Needs of Mobile and Vulnerable Populations in Selected Provinces in Mindanao IOM 1,200,000 A - VERY HIGH Sub total for CCCM 1,200,000 COORDINATION Strengthening humanitarian coordination and advocacy in Mindanao, Philippines OCHA 733,680 B - HIGH Sub total for COORDINATION 733,680 EARLY RECOVERY Livelihoods Preparation, Coping and Recovery from Quick-onset Disasters in Mindanao OXFAM GB 350,000 B - HIGH Support to the Recovery of IP Communities affected by Disasters in Mindanao UNDP 835,000 B - HIGH Support to the Enhancement of the Local Disaster Risk Reduction Capacities in Mindanao UNDP 500,000 B - HIGH Early Recovery and Rehabilitation Project for IDPs in Central Mindanao UNDP 3,051,000 A - VERY HIGH Livelihood support for Empowerment of Women IDPs in Maguindanao and Cotabato MWDECC 280,000 A - VERY HIGH Ensuring the protection of vulnerable IDPs after emergencies in returned and resettlement sites on their economic activities CEMILARDEF 350,000 B - HIGH Mainstreaming disability and inclusion of persons with disabilities in Mindanao emergency response HI 200,000 B - HIGH Sub total for EARLY RECOVERY 5,566,000 EDUCATION Alternative Learning for Children and Youth whose Education were affected by Conflict and Disaster in Central Mindanao CEMILARDEF 240,000 A - VERY HIGH Promoting Safe and Resilient Learning Institutions for Children in Communities Vulnerable to Complex Emergencies Balay 426,000 B - HIGH Education in emergencies for affected children in 6 provinces in Mindanao UNICEF 915,332 A - VERY HIGH Ensuring Provision of Support to Education of Children and Youth in Emergency and Disaster Affected Areas in Six (6) Most Vulnerable Municipalities of Province of Maguindanao, North Cotabato and Lanao Del Sur MYROi 322,000 B - HIGH Sub total for EDUCATION 1,903,332 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE Restoring agricultural livelihoods in conflict and communities in Northern and Central Mindanao FAO 1,982,855 B - HIGH Enhancing Agricultural Productivity and Conflict Resolution Capacities of Local and IDP Farmers in Conflict Affected Areas in Maguindanao and North Cotabato Provinces UNYPAD 210,000 B - HIGH
II: 2012 Strategic objective 1 Protect the affected population, particularly vulnerable individuals and groups, building on existing mechanisms Indicators Targets Achieved of October 2012 No. of affected people in IDP sites and return areas with access to basic services that meet humanitarian standards, for example SPHERE Baseline: SPHERE standard. Target: 6 regions/698,251 people. Source: Clusters Monitoring Report SPHERE principles were applied, but not all SPHERE standards are applicable in the local context. The humanitarian operation followed standards set by government. The implementation of the Minimum Initial Service Package for Reproductive Health in Crisis Situation (MISP), which is a SPHERE standard, benefitted 9,709 IDPs, mostly pregnant and lactating women in 10 return sites in Maguindanao and North Cotabato No. of protection cases reported by state/non-state actors that receive an adequate response Baseline: Currently being established Source: Protection Monitoring Report 95 incidents have been reported, which have displaced 263,613 people Prevalence of acute malnutrition in children under five years old below the national average percentage Baseline: 6.1% (National) Source: Department of Science and Technology – Food and Nutrition Research Institute, 2008 on survey data, the prevalence of malnutrition is increasing in some areas: GAM 7.3%, SAM 2.2%, MAM 5.2% Updated National Baseline is 7.3% but some Mindanao figures are worse: ARMM 10% (Basilan, Sulu, and Midsayap over 10%), CARAGA 8.6% Crude mortality rate Baseline: 5.1 deaths/1000 people) (National figure) April 2011, National Statistics Office (NSO) Quickstat 4.98 deaths/1,000 people (National figure July 2012, CIA World Factbook Strategic objective 2 Support the Government in responding to emergencies to reduce vulnerability of the affected population, based on assessed needs Indicators Targets Achieved of October 2012 Coordination between the Baseline: MHT contingency plan Contingency planning conducted,
Reproductive health- Maguindanao, North Cotabato, Cagayan de Oro and Iligan DOH/UNFPA December 2011 2011 Diseases Mobile clinic reports and rapid assessments Family Health Survey 2011 Nutrition All municipalities except Maguindanao National Nutrition Council 2011 Operation Timbang (Underweight prevalence) Lanao del Sur (Province) Municipalities of Arakan, Midsayap, President Roxas (North Cotabato), Kapatagan (Lanao del Sur) Cagayan de Oro and Iligan cities UNICEF/ACF ACF UNICEF/ACF 2010-2011 2012 (CDO, Iligan) Standardised Monitoring and Assessment of Relief and Transitions (SMART) Lanao del Sur, Maguindanao, North Cotabato FNRI 2011 2011 Updating of National Nutrition Survey (Wasting, Stunting, breastfeeding indicators at province level) Maguindanao UNICEF/SC 2010 Program monitoring of CMAM (acute malnutrition prevalence estimate) Maguindanao, Lanao del Sur, North Cotabato World Bank/WFP 2010 Comprehensive population survey (Food Security, access to basic services) FAO with local NGO (MMI) June 2012 Outcome Study of OSRO/PHI/101/NZE (Phase 1) Protection Whole Mindanao, focusing on fragile communities that are affected by forced displacement, especially in the 33 priority municipalities UNHCR (with government and State agencies, and humanitarian partners) 2011-2012 Protection Monitoring Reports IDP Assessment Reports Cluster Dashboards Knowledge map GBV Maguindanao, North Cotabato, Cagayan de Oro and Iligan City UNFPA (with humanitarian partners) December 2011 Focus Group Discussion Findings Regular Sub-cluster reports CPWG Whole Mindanao Maguindanao, Lanao del UNICEF and partners PLAN and Institute of July 2012 June 2012 Report on Grave Child Rights Violations 2010-2012 Rapid Study on Children in Conflict Affected Areas in Mindanao
and Agriculture communities agencies and humanitarian partners) Food Security Assessment Health Central Mindanao WHO/UNFPA Validation of existing BHS and its corresponding needs Reproductive Health – a comprehensive assessment of RH needs Nutrition Maguindanao UNICEF (with government agencies and humanitarian partners) Follow-up nutrition survey (province and/or municipal level) Protection Whole Mindanao particularly fragile communities that are affected by forced displacement, especially in the 33 priority municipalities UNHCR/UNICEF/UNFPA (with government agencies and humanitarian partners) Protection Monitoring IDP assessment AGDM assessment Child Protection Specific assessment in ECs, transitory sites and return areas SRH and GBV assessment of IDPs WASH Whole Mindanao UNICEF (with government agencies and humanitarian partners) Comprehensive WASH needs assessment
VI: Below is the planning scenario as established at the HAP strategic planning workshop on 18 September 2012. The scenario has since been adjusted to account for the Framework Agreement on Bangsamoro entered on 15 October 2012. Most Likely Scenario Theme Assumption Trigger People Affected Humanitarian Consequence GPH-MILF conflict Steady progress in the peace talks with the possibility of an initial agreement on the 10 decision points leading to a final peace agreement. A period of transition is expected if an agreement is reached. Spoiler elements may emerge causing further displacement. Recognition of a peaceful settlement among the parties. Issues of power, wealth and resource sharing are resolved. Creation of a New Political Entity to replace ARMM. Some parties may be dissatisfied with the agreement. 60,000-80,000 people Populations are displaced due to armed clashes initiated by spoiler groups. Shelters are damaged or destroyed. Livelihoods lost and/or disrupted. Infrastructures/facilities (roads, bridges, health, agriculture, irrigation) damaged. Rido and election-related violence Relatively stable political environment before and during the elections. Post-election violence may erupt if results are perceived to be illegitimate. Incidents of rido will continue. 2013 national and municipal general elections; violence erupt in election hotspot areas. Inter-clan disputes over land/political interests lead to armed engagement. 70,000 people (election-related violence) 200,000 people (rido) Bombing of schools. Loss of lives; people injured. Rido cause massive multiple displacement or short-term displacement lasting for about 1 month. Loss of livelihoods/properties. Security restrictions enforced. Increased risks to humanitarian service providers. Other violence and criminality NPA peace talks do not resume; rule of law implementation remains weak. Persisting criminalities (including kidnap-for-ransom); NPA continues attacks on assets of military and companies 10,000 people (not in need of humanitarian aid from the MHT) NPA situation is more about chronic underdevelopment and is not a humanitarian issue; the Government is able to respond to the humanitarian needs of the affected people. Natural disaster Flooding/landslides similar to 2012 magnitude. Seasonality plus climate change. 70,000 people Affected returnees, home-based population needs humanitarian support.