OA, awaiting TKR Adults w/ OA (n=59) compared to adults w/o OA (n=79) w/o OA: 7.4 (.5) s Females w/o OA: 7.6 (.3) s Group diff: p<.001 Persons 97 Hui, 200986 Intervention n=52 23 sessions of dance over twelve weeks Control group n=45 no intervention yes Baseline 7.5(1.43) three months 6.97(0.92) change -0.58(0.95) baseline 7.58(0.95) three months 7.47(1.12) change -1.12(0.62) p=0.01 Patients with hip and knee joint replacements 200 Gandhi, 200925 preoperative TUG scores n=200 12 week follow-up n=200 yes 18.6(7.9) seconds 12.8(4.7) seconds p ˂0.0001 Patients following total knee arthroplasty 66 Bruun-Olsen 200987 Intervention group n=30 CPM and active exercise Control Group n=33 active exercise alone yes preoperative TUG 12(4) seconds 3 months postoperative TUG 11(5) seconds preoperative TUG 13±6 seconds 3 months postoperative TUG 12±6 seconds elderly inpatients 62 intervention group n=33 received high intensity strength training 3 weeks control n=29 received regular intensity strength training Both groups improved baseline 27.6 15.90 p<0.0001 baseline 29.6 final 17.60 Population descriptor N Reference, sample size, intervention Responsive Yes / No Data supporting responsiveness Older females who have or are at risk for osteoporosis 31 Murphy, 200889 Intervention was 2x/wk 12 weeks of Tai Chi 1day at home yes post intervention -1.4, p<<0.0001 n=31 6 months post intervention -1.4, p<0.0001 n=29 12 months post intervention -1.1 p<0.001 n=30 older residents living in residential care facility in 149 Peri, 200790 no baseline 29.2(2.4) 3 months 27.8(2.4)
post women in Australia 104 Tan, 200841 The looks at comparison of physical performance measurements by osteoporotic fracture risk group non osteoporotic group n=55 osteoporotic group n=49 no TUG score 7.8(1.2) seconds TUG score 8.4(1.4 )seconds p=NS patients following transtibial amputation 27 Johannesson, 2008125 removable vacuum formed rigid dressing n-13 conventional rigid plaster of paris dressing n=10 no 41(24) seconds 29(14) seconds mean difference 14(-2-30) p=NS at the 3-month follow-up patients with rheumatoid arthritis in warm or cold climates 124 Staalesen Strumse, 2009126 intervention was 4 week rehabilitation Mediterranean climate n=72 Norwegian climate n=52 both made progress, climate did not matter baseline 13.9(2.4) week 4 baseline-1.5(1.4)ok week 16 - baseline -0.7(1.6) p=0.001 baseline 14.4(3.2) week 4 -1.6(2.5) p=0.001 week 16 -1.2(2.4) p=0.002 No difference between groups patients with COPD from an institutional pulmonary rehabilitation program 19 Chang,2008127 The study assessed the affect of an exercise task(6 minute walk test) on TUG performance no pre exercise score 8.77(1.95) post exercise score 9.01(2.27) p=NS Population descriptor N Reference, sample size, intervention Responsive Yes / No Data supporting responsiveness community dwelling elderly 19 Batson, 2008128 intervention was 2 of balance instruction using Alexander technique yes pretest average 11.22 seconds posttest average 9.53 seconds p=0.006 residents of care homes 249 Sackley, 2007129 intervention group n=128 PT and OT targeted to mobility control group n=121 received standard care no baseline 60(42) three months 68(50) six months 59(37) baseline 57(54) three months 59(56) six months 55(37)