Incorporating into the curriculum opportunities for all students to achieve the outcomes Aligned Systematic Reacting Ensuring the outcomes remain relevant and aligned with student, workplace and societal needs Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Designing, aligning and delivering cocurricular activities to support learning Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Selecting tools, methods and instruments used to assess attainment of common learning outcomes Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Assessing common learning outcomes Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Other identified processes Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting 1R1 Results Evaluation of Results and Systems Improvement Summary results of measures (including tables and figures when possible) Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Integrated
Comparison of results with internal targets and external benchmarks Aligned Systematic Reacting Interpretation of results and insights gained Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting 1I1 Comments 1.2: Program Learning Outcomes 1P2 Process Comments on Process Maturity and Improvement Aligning program learning outcomes to the mission, educational offerings and degree levels of the institution Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Determining program outcomes Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Articulating the purposes, content and level of Integrated Aligned
achievement of these outcomes Systematic Reacting Ensuring the outcomes remain relevant and aligned with student, workplace and societal needs Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Designing, aligning and delivering cocurricular activities to support learning Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Selecting tools, methods and instruments used to assess attainment of program learning outcomes Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Assessing program learning outcomes Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Other identified processes Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting 1R2 Results Evaluation of Results and Systems Improvement Overall levels of deployment of the program assessment processes within the institution (i.e., how many programs are/not assessing program goals) Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Integrated
Summary results of measures (including tables and figures when possible) Aligned Systematic Reacting Comparison of results with internal targets and external benchmarks Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Interpretation of assessment results and insights gained Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting 1I2 Comments 1.3: Academic Program Design 1P3 Process Comments on Process Maturity and Improvement Identifying student stakeholder groups and determining their educational needs Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Identifying other key stakeholder groups and determining their needs Integrated Aligned Systematic
Reacting Developing and improving responsive programming to meet all stakeholders’ needs Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Selecting the tools, methods and instruments used to assess the currency and effectiveness of academic programs Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Reviewing the viability of courses and programs and changing or discontinuing when necessary Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Other identified processes Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting 1R3 Results Evaluation of Results and Systems Improvement Summary results of assessments (including tables and figures when possible) Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Comparison of results with internal targets and external benchmarks Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Integrated
Selecting, implementing and maintaining specialized accreditation(s) Aligned Systematic Reacting Assessing the level of outcomes attainment by graduates at all levels Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Selecting the tools, methods and instruments used to assess program rigor across all modalities Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Other identified processes Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting 1R4 Results Evaluation of Results and Systems Improvement Summary results of assessments (including tables and figures when possible) Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Comparison of results with internal targets and external benchmarks Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Interpretation of results and insights gained Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting
1I4 Comments 1.5: Academic Integrity 1P5 Process Comments on Process Maturity and Improvement Ensuring freedom of expression and the integrity of research and scholarly practice Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Ensuring ethical learning and research practices of students Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Ensuring ethical teaching and research practices of faculty Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Selecting the tools, methods and instruments used to evaluate the effectiveness and comprehensiveness of supporting academic integrity Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Other identified processes Integrated Aligned Systematic
presented Adequate, but could be improved Unclear or incomplete 3.E. Strong, clear and well presented Adequate, but could be improved Unclear or incomplete 4.A. Strong, clear and well presented Adequate, but could be improved Unclear or incomplete 4.B. Strong, clear and well presented Adequate, but could be improved Unclear or incomplete Category 2: Meeting Student and Other Key Stakeholder Needs 2.1: Current and Prospective Student Needs 2P1 Process Comments on Process Maturity and Improvement Identifying underprepared and at-risk students, and determining their academic support needs Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Deploying academic support services to help students select and successfully complete courses and programs Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Integrated
Comments 2.2: Retention, Persistence and Completion 2P2 Process Comments on Process Maturity and Improvement Collecting student retention, persistence and completion data Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Determining targets for student retention, persistence and completion Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Analyzing information on student retention, persistence and completion Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Meeting targets for retention, persistence and completion Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Selecting tools, methods and instruments to assess retention, persistence and completion Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Other identified processes Integrated
Aligned Systematic Reacting 2R2 Results Evaluation of Results and Systems Improvement Summary results of measures (including tables and figures when possible) Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Comparison of results with internal targets and external benchmarks Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Interpretation of results and insights gained Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting 2I2 Comments 2.3: Key Stakeholder Needs 2P3
Comparison of results with internal targets and external benchmarks Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Interpretation of results and insights gained Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting 2I3 Comments 2.4: Complaint Processes 2P4 Process Comments on Process Maturity and Improvement Collecting complaint information from students Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Collecting complaint information from other key stakeholders Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Integrated Aligned
3P1 Process Comments on Process Maturity and Improvement Recruiting, hiring and orienting processes that result in staff and administrators who possess the required qualification, skills and values Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Developing and meeting academic credentialing standards for faculty, including those in dual credit, contractual and consortia programs Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Ensuring the institution has sufficient numbers of faculty to carry out both classroom and programs and activities Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Ensuring the acquisition of sufficient numbers of staff to provide student support services Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Tracking outcomes/measures utilizing appropriate tools Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Other identified processes Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting
Results Evaluation of Results and Systems Improvement Summary results of measures (including tables and figures when possible) Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Comparison of results with internal targets and external benchmarks Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Interpretation of results and insights gained Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting 3I2 Comments 3.3: Development 3P3 Process Comments on Process Maturity and Improvement Providing and supporting regular professional development for all employees Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Integrated
Adequate, but could be improved Unclear or incomplete 5.A. Strong, clear and well presented Adequate, but could be improved Unclear or incomplete Category 4: Planning and Leading 4.1: Mission and Vision 4P1 Process Comments on Process Maturity and Improvement Developing, deploying, and reviewing the institution’s mission, vision and values Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Ensuring that institutional actions reflect a commitment to its values Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Communicating the mission, vision and values Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Ensuring that academic programs and services are consistent with the institution’s mission Aligned Systematic Reacting Integrated Allocating resources to advance the institution’s Aligned Systematic
mission and vision, while upholding the institution’s values Reacting Integrated Tracking outcomes/measures utilizing appropriate tools (e.g. brand studies, focus groups, community forums/studies and employee satisfaction surveys) Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Other identified processes Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting 4R1 Results Evaluation of Results and Systems Improvement Summary results of measures (including tables and figures when possible) Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Comparison of results with internal targets and external benchmarks Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Interpretation of results and insights gained Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting 4I1 Comments
4.3: Leadership 4P3 Process Comments on Process Maturity and Improvement Establishing appropriate relationship between the institution and its governing board to support leadership and governance Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Establishing oversight responsibilities and policies of the governing board Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Maintaining board oversight, while delegating management responsibilities to administrators and academic matters to faculty Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Ensuring open communication between and among all colleges, divisions and departments Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Collaborating across all units to ensure the maintenance of high academic standards Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Providing effective leadership to all institutional stakeholders Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Developing leaders at all levels within the institution Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting
4.4: Integrity 4P4 Process Comments on Process Maturity and Improvement Developing and communicating standards Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Training employees for and modeling ethical and legal behavior across all levels of the institution Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Operating financial, academic, personnel and auxiliary functions with integrity, including following fair and ethical policies and adhering to processes for the governing board, administration, faculty, and staff. Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Making information about programs, requirements, faculty and staff, costs to students, control, and accreditation relationships readily and clearly available to all constituents Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Other identified processes Integrated Aligned Systematic
Making data, information, and performance results readily and reliably available to the units and departments that depend upon this information for operational effectiveness, planning and improvements Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Ensuring the timeliness, accuracy, reliability and security of the institution’s knowledge management system(s) and related processes. Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Tracking outcomes/measures utilizing appropriate tools (including software platforms and/or contracted services) Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Other identified processes Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting 5R1 Results Evaluation of Results and Systems Improvement Summary results of measures (including tables and figures when possible) Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Comparison of results with internal targets and external benchmarks Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Interpretation of results and insights gained Integrated Aligned
Systematic Reacting 5I1 Comments 5.2: Resource Management 5P2 Process Comments on Process Maturity and Improvement Maintaining fiscal, physical and technological infrastructures sufficient to support operations. Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Setting goals aligned with the institutional mission, resources, opportunities and emerging needs. Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Allocating and assigning resources to achieve organizational goals, while ensuring that educational purposes are not adversely affected. Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Tracking outcomes/measures utilizing appropriate tools Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Integrated
Other identified processes Aligned Systematic Reacting 5R2 Results Evaluation of Results and Systems Improvement Summary results of measures (including tables and figures when possible) Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Comparison of results with internal targets and external benchmarks Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Interpretation of results and insights gained Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting 5I2 Comments 5.3: Operational Effectiveness 5P3 Process Comments on Process Maturity and Improvement
Building budgets to accomplish institutional goals Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Monitoring financial position and adjusting budgets Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Maintaining a technological infrastructure that is reliable, secure and Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Maintaining a physical infrastructure that is reliable, secure and Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Managing risks to ensure operational stability, including emergency preparedness Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Tracking outcomes/measures utilizing appropriate tools Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting Other identified processes Integrated Aligned Systematic Reacting 5R3 Results Evaluation of Results and Systems Improvement Integrated