4ii(1) or (2) below. If verification process is not available pursuant to subparagraph 4ii(1) below, or manufacturer testing has not been conducted in accordance with subparagraph 4ii(2) below or has been conducted in accordance with subparagraph 4ii(2) below but has been determined to be not acceptable under subparagraph 4ii(4) below, then the facility shall demonstrate conformance using subparagraph 4ii(3) below: (1) An applicable verification process approved by the Department pursuant to the EETV Act, or through TARP, available from the Department's Bureau of Sustainable Communities and Innovative Technologies at (609) 292-9692 or ; (2) The manufacturer's test protocol, provided the facility maintains on-site for inspection by the Department a copy of the protocol, test data and the test report, and available for Department review or request, and producing documents from the equipment manufacturer that the manufacturer has: (A) Performed representative source emission testing on a model of equipment; (B) Had the source emission testing and the test report reviewed and certified by a licensed professional engineer; (C) Conducted a minimum of three consecutive one-hour test runs, in which the average of the test runs shall not have exceeded the emission limits stated at subparagraphs 4i (A) and (B) above; and (D) Converted each test run to pounds per megawatt hour before averaging; or (3) Stack emission testing provided the facility has: (A) Developed and used, a stack emission testing protocol using the protocol templates in Technical Manual 1004, available at the Department's website ; (B) Conducted a minimum of three consecutive one-hour test runs, in which the average of the test runs shall not exceed the emission limits stated at 4i(A) and (B) above; and (C) Converted the results of each test run to pounds per megawatt hour before averaging.
N.J.A.C. 7:27-22.31(y)4 b. Review Screening Modeling Per Review c. Review Refined Modeling Per Review 10. Air Quality Impact Analysis-non PSD a. Evaluate Protocol Per Protocol $ 1,685 b. Review Screening Modeling Per Review $ 1,685 c. Review Refined Modeling Per Review $ 2,527 11. Risk Assessment a. Evaluate Protocol Per Protocol $ 2,527 b. Review Risk Assessment Per Review $ 2,527 12. Testing a. Stack Test i. Evaluate Protocol (up to three probes) Per Protocol Per Stack $ 1,267 ii. Evaluate Protocol (more than three probes) Per Protocol Per Stack $ 1,685 iii. Review Testing Report (up to three probes) Per Report Per Stack $ 1,267 iv. Review Testing Report (more than three probes) Per Report Per Stack $ 1,685 b. Continuous Emission Monitors i. Evaluate Equipment Protocol Per Protocol Per Stack $ 842.00 ii. Evaluate Performance Specification Test Protocol Per Protocol Per Stack $ 842.00 iii. Review Testing Report Per Report Per Stack $ 842.00 c. On-site Monitoring of Sample Collection Pursuant to an Approved Source-Specific Testing Protocol Per Day Per Person $ 1,267 d. Periodic Monitoring Equipment Protocol Per Protocol $ 425.00 (aa) Effective February 27, 2015, the adjusted fee schedule for a registration is set forth at (aa)1 and 2 below. Activity Basis Amount 1. Registration for initial authorization, or renewal of authorization, to act under a General Operating Permit Per Registration $ 820.00 2. Registration for, or five-year renewal of, authorization to operate a used oil space heater under N.J.A.C. 7:27-20.3 Per Registration $ 820.00 7:27-22.32 Hearings and appeals (a) An adjudicatory hearing regarding a determination made by the Department pursuant to