zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
REPORT OF SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS ISSUED (RSMI) INSTRUCTIONS This form shall be prepared by designated personnel in the Supply and Property Unit (SPU) on a daily basis The SPU personnel shall fill up all the blank spaces under the columns as follows: Agency – name of agency Date – period covered by the report No. – assigned RSMI number which shall be in the following manner: 00 – 00 – 000 Serial number (one series for each month) Month Year 4. RIS No. – Requisition and Issue Slip (RIS) number served within the day 5. Responsibility Center – code of the requesting office 6. Stock No. – assigned stock number of supplies and materials issued within the day 7. Item – description of stocks issued 8. Unit – unit of measurement of stocks issued 9. Quantity Issued – quantity of stocks issued based on RIS 10. Recapitulation – summary of issuances by stock no. 11. Certification – the certification of the report shall be signed by the Supply Officer C. Upon receipt of this report, the designated accounting personnel shall fill up the following columns as follows: 1. Unit Cost – cost of supplies and materials issued by the agency using the moving average method 2. Amount – amount (Qty. Issued x Unit Cost) of supplies and materials issued within the day 3. Posted by/date – name and signature of the accounting personnel who posted to Supplies Ledger Card on recapitulation D. The RSMI shall be prepared in two copies to be distributed as follows: Original – Accounting Unit to support the JEV drawn to record issuance from the stocks Duplicate copy – Supply Officer’s file E. The SPU personnel shall summarize all issuances by stock number F. The Chief of the SPU shall certify the correctness of the information in the RSMI G. At the end of the month, all RSMI shall be consolidated for the preparation of the JEV.
CIP-005-5 R1 – Electronic Security Perimeter Part Applicable Systems Requirements Measures 1.4 High Impact BES Cyber Systems with Dial-up Connectivity and their associated: PCA Medium Impact BES Systems with Dial-up Connectivity and their associated: PCA Where technically feasible, perform authentication when establishing Dial-up Connectivity with applicable Cyber Assets. An example of evidence may include, but is not limited to, a documented process that describes how the Responsible Entity is providing authenticated access through each connection. Registered Entity Response (Required): Describe, in narrative form, how you meet compliance with this requirement. Registered Entity Evidence (Required): The following information is requested for each document submitted as evidence. Also, evidence submitted should be highlighted and bookmarked, as appropriate, to identify the exact location where evidence of compliance may be found. File Name Document Revision or Version Document Date Relevant Page(s) or Section(s) Description of Applicability of Document Audit Team Evidence Reviewed (This section to be completed by the Compliance Monitor Administrator): Compliance Assessment Approach Specific to Part 1.4 This section to be completed by the Compliance Monitor Administrator Verify the Responsible Entity has documented one or more processes to perform authentication when establishing Dial-up Connectivity with applicable Cyber Assets, where technically feasible. For each Cyber Asset of an Applicable System, verify authentication is performed when establishing a dial-up connection. Note to Auditor: If the Responsible Entity does not have or does not allow Dial-up Connectivity, the Responsible Entity is not required to document one or more processes to perform authentication when establishing Dial-up Connectivity with applicable Cyber Assets. It is sufficient to verify that they do not have Dial-up Connectivity. CIP-005-5 Table R1 – Electronic Security Perimeter
musicians for several centuries, and provide a legacy that is still cherished a hundred years later. The vision of the musician as both ‘the dreamer of dreams’ and ‘the mover and shaker of the world’ must have been one that Elgar instinctively connected with. Nor is O’Shaunessey’s poem always modest about the impact the work of the musician can have on humanity. Phrases such as ‘A breath of our inspiration is the life of each generation’ and ‘O men! It must ever be that we dwell, in our dreaming and singing, a little apart from ye’ are poetic and flamboyant and rife for the maestoso treatment that Elgar was so renowned for. And yet, in many ways this setting is a deeply personal and reflective one. A major feature of the work is the number of quotes Elgar makes from his own music – themes from the two symphonies and the Violin Concerto make appearances, and more notably in the very centre of the work (fifth stanza) the text ‘But on one man’s soul it hath broken, a light that doth not depart’ is set to Nimrod from the ‘Enigma Variations’. ‘Wandering by lone sea-breakers’ in the first stanza is accompanied by the opening of the ‘Sea Pictures’ (a piece that is also for solo alto and orchestra), and on several occasions the words ‘dreams’ or ‘dreamers’ make use of themes from what is perhaps Elgar’s best choral work ‘The Dream of Gerontius’. quotes are not intended to reflect Elgar as a hero (as Richard Strauss was doing with his self-quotes in ‘Ein Heldenleben’) but rather as the self-sacrificing artist – thoughtful and inspirational, apart from and yet a vital part of humanity. The alto soloist plays a major role in two large sections – in stanzas five and six (‘They had no vision amazing…’) and the final stanza (‘Great hail! we cry to the comers from the dazzling unknown shore’). These more than any are personal affirmations of the noble and vital role of the creative soul – and in particular that of the musician. ‘Great hail!’ we do indeed cry to those who are yet to come and whose role it will be to dream, to inspire and to ‘teach us your song’s new numbers’ for the next century and beyond. 5 Words by Arthur O’Shaughnessy – Ode
3.1 High Impact BES Cyber Systems and their associated: EACMS; and PACS Medium Impact BES Cyber Systems at Control Centers and their associated: EACMS; and PACS No later than 90 calendar days after completion of a recovery plan test or actual recovery: Document any lessons learned associated with a recovery plan test or actual recovery or document the absence of any lessons learned; Update the recovery plan based on any documented lessons learned associated with the plan; and Notify each person or group with a defined role in the recovery plan of the updates to the recovery plan based on any documented lessons learned. An example of evidence may include, but is not limited to, all of the following: documentation of identified deficiencies or lessons learned for each recovery plan test or actual incident recovery or dated documentation stating there were no lessons learned; Dated and revised recovery plan showing any changes based on the lessons learned; and Evidence of plan update distribution including, but not limited to: Emails; USPS or other mail service; Electronic distribution system; or Training sign-in sheets. Registered Entity Response (Required): Describe, in narrative form, how you meet compliance with this requirement. Registered Entity Evidence (Required): The following information is requested for each document submitted as evidence. Also, evidence submitted should be highlighted and bookmarked, as appropriate, to identify the exact location where evidence of compliance may be found. File Name Document Revision or Version Document Date Relevant Page(s) or Section(s) Description of Applicability of Document Audit Team Evidence Reviewed (This section to be completed by the Compliance Monitor Administrator): Compliance Assessment Approach Specific to Part 3.1 This section to be completed by the Compliance Monitor Administrator Verify that no later than 90 calendar days after completion of a recovery plan test or actual recovery, the Responsible Entity has:
Signature of Host Supervisor: Name in block letter: Date: ____________________________________ SECTION D COMMENTS OF STUDENT’S SUPERVISOR IN LINGNAN I have examined the report and rate the student’s performance as □ very satisfactory / □ satisfactory / □ unsatisfactory/ □ very unsatisfactory. (please put a‘’in the box as appropriate) Comments: Signature of Lingnan Supervisor: Name in block letter: _ Date: ___________________________ SECTION E ENDORSEMENT/COMMENTS OF HEAD OF DEPARTMENT CONCERNED IN LINGNAN
Reliability Standard Audit Worksheet for British Columbia CIP-010-1 – Cyber Security – Configuration Change Management & Vulnerability Assessments Reliability Standard Effective Date for BC: October 1, 2018 The Compliance Monitor Administrator must complete this section Registered Entity: [Name & ACRO] WCR Number: WCRXXXXX Compliance Assessment Date: start date – audit end date] Compliance Monitoring Method: [Audit Type] Applicable Function(s): BA, DP, GO, GOP, TO, TOP Names of Auditors: Findings Table: Req. Finding Summary and Documentation Functions Monitored
Operating system(s) (including version) or firmware where no independent operating system exists; any commercially available or open-source application software (including version) intentionally installed; any custom software installed; any logical network accessible ports; and any security patches applied. Verify the Responsible Entity has a baseline configuration for each Applicable System, individually or by group, which includes: Operating system(s) (including version) or firmware where no independent operating system exists; any commercially available or open-source application software (including version) intentionally installed; any custom software installed; any logical network accessible ports; and any security patches applied. CIP-010-1 Table R1 – Configuration Change Management Part Applicable Systems Requirements Measures 1.2 High Impact BES Cyber Systems and their associated: EACMS; PACS; and PCA Medium Impact BES Cyber Systems and their associated: PACS; and PCA Authorize and document changes that deviate from the existing baseline configuration. Examples of evidence may include, but are not limited to: A change request record and associated electronic authorization (performed by the individual or group with the authority to authorize the change) in a change management system for each change; or Documentation that the change was performed in accordance with the requirement. Registered Entity Response (Required): Describe, in narrative form, how you meet compliance with this requirement. Registered Entity Evidence (Required):
RSP Area State Load Zone Capacity Rating(b) (MW) % of RSP Subarea % of State Capacity Rating(b) (MW) % of RSP Subarea % of State BHE Maine ME 854 100 27 1,050 100 30 ME Maine ME 851 100 27 956 100 27 SME Maine ME 1,470 100 46 1,544 100 43 New Hampshire ME 0 0 0 <1 0 <1 1,470 100 46 1,545 100 44 NH Maine NH <1 0 <1 <1 0 <1 New Hampshire NH 4,179 99 100 4,430 99 100 Vermont NH 0.3 0 <1 0 <1 VT 33 1 39 1 33 1 40 1 4,212 100 108 4,471 100 107 VT New Hampshire NH 1 0 <1 3 1 <1 VT 1 0 <1 4 1 <1 1 0 7 <1 Vermont NH 86 27 20 88 20 16 VT 234 73 54 350 79 63 321 99 74 438 98 79 323 100 74 445 100 79 BOSTON Massachusetts NEMA 2,564 100 23 3,065 100 23 WCMA 0 0 <1 0 0 0 2,564 100 23 3,065 100 23 CMA/NEMA Massachusetts WCMA 176 100 2 172 100 1 WMA Massachusetts WCMA 3,657 98 33 3,855 98 28 Vermont WCMA 77 2 18 76 2 14 3,735 100 51 3,931 100 42 SEMA Massachusetts SEMA 3,220 93 29 3,357 92 25 Island RI 242 7 13 279 13 3,461 100 42 3,636 100 38 RI Massachusetts SEMA 1,471 47 13 3,109 63 23 Island RI 1,664 53 87 1,846 37 87 3,135 100 101 4,955 100 110 CT Connecticut CT 5,917 100 71 6,153 100 69 SWCT Connecticut CT 2,305 100 27 2,586 100 29 NOR Connecticut CT 170 100 2 191 100 2 Total 29,174 33,157 (a) Totals may vary because of rounding. (b) The values shown are seasonal claimed capability are based on the 2017 CELT. Summer Seasonal Claimed Capability of New England’s Generating Resources Table 49 shows the megawatt amount of summer seasonal claimed capability of the generating resources, both systemwide and for each RSP subarea, categorized by the assumed operating classification of the resource design.
Name RP.Rsum FC FDR gene name description ENSGACT00000014769 249.476 -2.2 0 DHCR24 24-dehydrocholesterol reductase ENSGACT00000014759 249.6019 -2.1 0 DHCR24 24-dehydrocholesterol reductase ENSGACT00000006262 87.4668 3.4 0 EIF5 eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5 ENSGACT00000007021 148.7221 7.6 0 ENY2 enhancer of yellow 2 homolog (Drosophila) ENSGACT00000003469 197.4428 2.9 0 EPCAM epithelial cell adhesion molecule ENSGACT00000013964 385.1078 -1.9 0 HSD17B10 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:4800] ENSGACT00000004624 292.6058 1.6 0 NFASC (2 of 2) neurofascin homolog (chicken) ENSGACT00000004634 137.8007 2.1 0 NFASC (2 of 2) neurofascin homolog (chicken) ENSGACT00000001175 55.3973 -4.7 0 PARP3 poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase family, member 3 ENSGACT00000012576 55.0692 4.9 0 POMC (1 of 2) proopiomelanocortin ENSGACT00000008740 6.8986 20.4 0 PRL prolactin ENSGACT00000015224 23.9393 7.8 0 Q8AWC4_GASAC Luteinizing hormone beta subunit precursor ENSGACT00000015210 14.18 11.7 0 Q8AWC4_GASAC Luteinizing hormone beta subunit precursor ENSGACT00000006634 91.3648 -3.9 0 RPL4 ribosomal protein L4 name RP.Rsum FC FDR gene name description ENSGACT00000006657 241.5606 -2.1 0 RPL4 ribosomal protein L4
were upregulated in experimental males compared to control males. For illustration, correlations marked with ‡ are shown in Figure S9. rank behaviour Spearman's r transcript annotation 1 Time chasing 0.9 ENSGACT00000001121 Novel 2 Number of chases 0.9 ENSGACT00000001122 Novel 2 Time chasing 1.0 ENSGACT00000001122 3 Latency -0.9 ENSGACT00000001124 Novel 3 Bites 1.0 ENSGACT00000001124 Novel 4 Number of chases 0.9 ENSGACT00000001126 Novel 4 Time chasing 1.0 ENSGACT00000001126 Novel 5 Latency -0.9 ENSGACT00000001460 Novel 5 Time chasing 0.9 ENSGACT00000001460 Novel 6 0.9 ENSGACT00000001644 Novel 7 Latency‡ -1.0 ENSGACT00000001989 SLC4A2 7 Bites 0.9 ENSGACT00000001989 SLC4A2 8 Time chasing 0.9 ENSGACT00000003469 EPCAM
Number of bites 0.66 0.42 0.66 0.07 Number of orients 0.59 0.35 0.58 0.04 Time orienting 0.32 0.26 0.47 0.48 Number of chases 0.68 0.40 0.65 0.02 Time chasing 0.72 0.38 0.63 <0.01 Time spent chasing 0.50 0.28 0.51 0.08 Cerebellum Latency 0.45 0.31 0.55 0.67 Number of bites 0.41 0.29 0.52 0.86 Number of orients 0.45 0.32 0.53 0.60 Time orienting 0.31 0.33 0.58 0.03 Number of chases 0.67 0.29 0.52 <0.01 Time spent chasing 0.50 0.28 0.51 0.08 Brain Stem Latency 0.67 0.41 0.66 0.03
Supplemental Fig S. The relationship of overall crossover rate and chromosome size. The dashed line represents standard linear regression and is for illustrative purposes only. Supplemental Fig S. The correlation of (A) average crossover numbers or (B) average crossover rate between (P. persica) and inter- specific groups. The dashed line represents standard linear regression and is for illustrative purposes only.
Band Name Home Association Membership Number Band Official’s Name Date Email Address Home Association Grade (insert ‘Y’ in the appropriate box) 1 2 3 4 5 Juvenile Age Band? (Y/N) RSPBA Requested Grade (insert ‘Y’ in the appropriate box) 1 2 3A 3B 4A 4B Juvenile Nov Juv A Nov Juv B Complete Competition Roster Use the following player codes: Pipe Major (PM), Assistant Pipe Major (APM), Piper (P), Lead Drummer (LD), Snare Drummer (S), Tenor Drummer (T), Bass Drummer (B), Drum Major (M). Assistant Pipe Major is only for Juvenile and Novice Juvenile bands. Player Name List Highest Grade of Competition Band regularly played with in last 5 years (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) If applicable, list Highest Grade served as PM, PS, or LD of an Adult Band Player Code 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Fostering Cats Please complete the following section if you are interested in fostering cats Please indicate which of the following fosters you’d be interested in. Mother cat with nursing young - mother will need to be kept with young until they are weaned at four to five weeks of age. Yes □ No □ Neonatal kittens – orphans under four weeks of age requiring intensive hand rearing and four to six weeks of care. Yes □ No □ Juvenile kittens – four to eight weeks of age requiring two to four weeks of care. Yes □ No □ Injured or sick animals – will probably require medications or special housing conditions Yes □ No □ Are you able to keep your foster(s) safe at all times (inside your house with secure doors and windows or in an outdoor enclosure)? Yes □ No □ Fostering Dogs Please complete the following section if you are interested in fostering dogs Please indicate which of the following fosters you’d be interested in. Puppy Yes □ No □ Small Yes □ No □ Adult Yes □ No □ Medium Yes □ No □ Senior Yes □ No □ Large Yes □ No □ How big is your yard? Is your yard fully enclosed? Yes □ No □ What material is your fence made of? How high are your fences? Is the fence in good condition? Yes □ No □ If you aren’t currently a dog owner, have your previously owned a dog? If yes, please provide details. Yes □ No □ What experience do you have in dog behaviour and training? If you have any other information or comments you would like to share, please do so below. Thank you for completing this application. Please return it to Gemma Hogben, Volunteers’ Coordinator. Email -gemma.hogben@rspca-act.org.au Post - PO Box 3082, Weston Creek ACT 2611
Bidders Response Organisation Details (for information only) 1.1 Organisation Name and Legal Status: e.g. Company Ltd 1.2 Address: 1.3 Registered address (if different from above): 1.4 Phone Number: 1.5 Details of contact person for competition Include name, position, address, telephone number and email address. 1.6 Email Address: 1.7 Website Address: 1.8 Company Registration Number: 1.9 Date of registration: 1.10 Has the organisation traded under any other names: Yes/No (delete as appropriate and provide details)
2.6 If asked, would you be able to provide at least one of the following? A statement of your turnover, profit & loss account and cash flow for the most recent year of trading Yes/No A statement of your cash flow forecast for the current year and a bank letter outlining the current cash and credit position Yes/No Business Activities for Lead Consultant 3.1 What are the main business activities of your organisation? 3.2 How many staff does your organisation have? 3.3 ARB Registration Experience
Joanne and Cath Coward, Health Improvement Officers, Public Health Team Joanne Smith and Cath Coward, Health Improvement Officers, Public Health Team The course is now only delivered by Cath Coward, Health & Wellbeing Development Officer No. Of Courses Delivered 2008 – 14(Dec) 2015/16 2016/17 23 courses 242 attendees 10.5 average attendance 4 courses 40 attendees 10 average attendance 5 courses – 25% increase 48 attendees – 20% increase 9.6 average attendance Evaluation of Courses 2008 – 14(Dec) 2015/16 2016/17 Standard RSPH evaluation sheet used throughout 97.5% pass rate achieved Standard RSPH evaluation sheet used 100% pass rate achieved Members of the Health & Wellbeing Board who completed the course Standard RSPH evaluation used 100% pass rate achieved Impact of Change on running costs 2008 – 2014 2015/16 2016/17
Section 2: Certification Information How would you assess your company’s level of preparedness for an RSPO assessment? New to this process Previously certified/audited Comments: Have any of the affiliated companies listed above obtained RSPO certification? Have any of the affiliated companies listed obtained other relevant certifications? (e.g., ISO 9001, ISO 14001): Desired date /time frame for certification assessment: Desired date / time for award of certification (if warranted): Section 3: Certification Unit Information 3.1 GENERAL INFORMATION The unit of certification under RSPO is the mill and its supply base. Please describe each affiliated company seeking certification and its supply base to the best of your ability below. Company name Description of mill (# mills/mill name/location) Mill output (mt): Supply Chain Model (IP or MB) Description of supply base (# of estates/scheme SH/independent SH/ outgrowers) 3.2 APPLICANT INFORMATION For the individual company seeking certification under this application, complete the following tables: A. Mill Information Name of Mill(s)
Lubricant Inner cannula Outer cannula Lyofoam Trach care kit Bivona Extra length Silver Jackson ET tube adapter Lanz Buttons Fenestrated Explain each of the following processes as it relates to endotracheal tube and tracheostomy tubes: Cuff management Changing process Wound care (trach tube) Communication devices Removal (decannulation) Describe the results of improper ET & tracheostomy care. Describe the common lesions associated with tracheal State the ideal intra-cuff pressure (in cm H2O & mm Hg) and the consequences of extraordinary high pressures and demonstrate cuff pressure measurement. Differentiate between “minimal leak technique” and “minimal occlusive volume”. Describe the techniques for providing proper artificial airway humidification and the complications of inappropriate humidity. Describe the techniques for preventing nosocomial infections in patients with tracheal airways. On an anatomical model, demonstrate proper technique for placement, maintenance and removal of the following airways: Endotracheal tube Tracheostomy tube Demonstrate a proper method for securing an endotracheal tube. Demonstrate a proper method for performing oral care. PART 3 – Artificial Clearance Describe the following in regards to Suctioning according to the AARC’s Describe each of the following as it relates to
VOLUNTEER APPLICATION FORM Please complete Sections 1 and 2 fully Section 1 Personal details Title: Date of Birth: National Insurance No: Surname: Forename: Address: …………………………………………………. …………………………………………………. …………………………………………………. Postcode:………………………………… Contact information: Email: Home: Mobile: Work: Emergency Contact Details Name: Relationship: Address: ……………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………. Postcode: …………………………………………… Contact Information: Mobile: Home: Work: Email:
Drainage: Following criticism of the plans the applicants submitted further drainage proposals following the formal end of the consultation – these acknowledge the plans will see periodic overspill of water across the Lower Luton Road towards the ford but claim it is at an acceptable level. Archaeology: Material published in early January includes a report from HCC’s own Historic built environment department, which highlights that despite their attempts to provide an acceptable preservation of the archaeological interests found in site investigations (interests that were contrary to expectations of the applicants expressed at their exhibitions), the applicants have twice failed to make adequate plans and have since indicated that they do not wish to discuss the preservation requirements further until a planning determination is made. In essence the Applicants appear to have decided to take a chance on conditions being imposed and that there is a greater chance of further mitigating these into lesser conditions during any development. With many nationally acknowledged experts rating preliminary finds as highly significant, and the discovery or archaeological material in nearly half the trial trenches on the site, the apparently cavalier attitude of the developers is both unacceptable in the context of the Archaeology and the development as a whole. ENDS
Big Data Law Security Trends Cloud Security Mobile Security Social Engineering Cyber Warfare Network Security Social Networking Data Security Physical Security & Critical Infrastructure Strategy & Architecture Endpoints Policy & Government Supply Chain Security Executive & Board Practitioner Perspective Threat Intelligence Governance, Risk & Compliance Privacy Virtualization Hackers & Threats Professional Development & Workforce Security Tags: Please provide up to 5 keywords to describe your session. access control data security identity management & governance penetration testing security services anti-malware data sovereignty identity theft phishing SIEM anti-spam denial of service incident response physical security social engineering application security DevOps insider threats PII social networking audit digital rights Internet of Things policy management software code vulnerability analysis authentication e-discovery intrusion detection privacy software defined networking big data encryption key management professional development & workforce SSO biometrics endpoint security law remote access standards botnets ethics legislation research supply chain BYOD exploit of vulnerability machine learning risk management threat intelligence sharing case studies firewalls malware secure coding threat management cloud security forensics managed security services security analytics user behavior analytics consumerization fraud metrics security architecture virtualization critical infrastructure governance risk and compliance mobile applications security awareness visualization cryptography government regulations mobile security security consulting vulnerability assessment cyberterrorism government spying network security security education web services security cyber warfare hackers and threats password management security intelligence zero day vulnerability data loss prevention hacktivism patch management security operations Submitters Comments (limit 400 characters including spaces)
How we will use your information Processing of your personal data by Monmouthshire County Council (MCC) is necessary to levy charges for Council Tax & Business Rates under the Local Government Finance Act 1992. Without this information, Monmouthshire County Councils Revenues Team may not be able to fulfil this statutory requirement. Your details will be legitimately shared with council officers, Hubs, Contact Centre, our print houses (Canon, Publisure & Mediascene) and the Shared Benefits Service, in a safe and secure manner. From time to time it may also be necessary that we share your personal details with the Department for Work & Pensions, the Valuation Office, Swift Credit Service, B&S Enforcement Agents, Police, Welsh Government & other Councils. Your personal details will not be shared further, unless in relation to safeguarding or other legal obligations. Your records will be safely stored and retained in line with our retention policy, unless we need to retain under another lawful basis. You have a number of rights in relation to the information including the of access to information we hold about you and the right to complain if you are unhappy with the way your information is being processed. Should you need to make a complaint about the way your data has been processed, please contact dataprotection@monmouthshire.go.uk or if you are not fully satisfied you may contact the Information Commissioner’s Office online at or via their helpline: 0303 123 1113
Engineering Marketing Finance Operations/Production Information Security Quality Control/Research & Development Information Technology Sales Other – Please Specify: Select the Topic Category that would be most appropriate for your topic. * Advanced Targeted Attacks Identity Management Research Application Security & DevOps Insider Threats Security Analytics & Incident Response Awareness & Education Internet of Things Security Services Big Data Law Security Trends Cloud Security Mobile Security Social Engineering Cyber Warfare Network Security Social Networking Data Security Physical Security & Critical Infrastructure Strategy & Architecture Endpoints Policy & Government Supply Chain Security Executive & Board Practitioner Perspective Threat Intelligence Governance, Risk & Compliance Privacy Virtualization Hackers & Threats Professional Development & Workforce Security Tags: Please provide up to 5 keywords to describe your session. * access control data security identity management & governance penetration testing security services anti-malware data sovereignty identity theft phishing SIEM anti-spam denial of service incident response physical security social engineering application security DevOps insider threats PII social networking audit digital rights Internet of Things policy management software code vulnerability analysis authentication e-discovery intrusion detection privacy software defined networking big data encryption key management professional development & workforce SSO biometrics endpoint security law remote access standards botnets ethics legislation research supply chain BYOD exploit of vulnerability machine learning risk management threat intelligence sharing
Ryan White Services Report (RSR) Crosswalk RSR Your System ID Variable Definition Value Variable Value Notes Demographics 2 Enrollment Status The client’s vital enrollment status at the end of the reporting period. Active, continuing in program Referred to another program or services, or discharged because self-sufficient Removed from treatment due to violation of rules Incarcerated Relocated Deceased 4 BirthYear Client’s year of birth. This value should be on or before all service date years for the client. yyyy 5 Ethnicity Client’s ethnicity. Hispanic/Latino/a, or Spanish origin Spanish origin 68 Hispanic Subgroup If Ethnicity = Hispanic/Latino(a), Client’s Hispanic (choose all that apply) Mexican, Mexican American, Chicano/a Puerto Rican Cuban Another Hispanic, Latino/a or Spanish origin 6 Race Client’s race. White Black or African American Asian Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander American Indian or
Alaska Native 69 Asian Subgroup If Race = Asian, Client’s Asian subgroup. (choose all that apply) Asian Indian Chinese Filipino Japanese Korean Vietnamese Other Asian 70 NHPI Subgroup If Race = Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, Client’s Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander subgroup.(choose all that apply) Native Hawaiian Guamanian or Chamorro Samoan Other Pacific Islander 7 Gender Client’s current gender identity. This is the variable that is used for the eUCI. Male Female Transgender Unknown 71 Sex at Birth The biological sex assigned to the client at birth Male Female 8 Transgender Client’s current transgender status. Male-to-Female Female-to-Male Unknown 9 Poverty Level Client’s percent of the Federal poverty level at the end of the reporting period. Below 100% of the Federal poverty level 100 -138% of the Federal poverty level 139 - 200% of the Federal poverty level 201 – 250% of the
From 1 to 7 where: = No evidence = Unsatisfactory = Fair = Good = Very Good = Excellent = Outstanding 3 Strength of the Interdisciplinary collaboration and ability of the team to build research capacity 20% 4 Feasibility of the project and likelihood of meeting objectives within the stated time 15% 5 Novelty of the proposed project 15% 6 Justification of the budget 10% Assessment Criteria 1: Significance and capacity to lead change in practice or service delivery Assessment of the significance of the proposed research will be on the basis of: Burden of disease Translation Impact Innovation. 3.1.1 Burden of disease Describe how this project will address and reduce the burden of disease addressed in your proposal (no more than ¾ of an A4 page) 3.1.2 Translational Aspect of the Research Proposal What is the translational aspect of your project? (Select one box)
Inserting text Type directly into the text box above, maintaining format as described above; or Cut and paste (e.g. from a previous document) into the text box – note you may lose formatting if you choose this option; or Embed a PDF document (displayed as an icon) of your complete proposal, maintaining formatting as described below. Prepare your Research Proposal as per the format instructions above Save your Research Proposal as a PDF document Place Cursor in the box above Select “Insert” tab on MSWord Toolbar Select “Object” and choose “Create from File” from drop down Browse for your PDF document Select Insert Select “Display as Icon” Click OK An icon of your Research Proposal content should be displayed in the box above. 3.3 ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 3: Strength of the Interdisciplinary collaboration and ABILITY of the team to capacity in research 3.3.1 Describe the collaborative and interdisciplinary strengths of the project (less than ½ an A4 page) 3.3.2 Principal INVESTIGATOR (PI) (applicant) PI Contact Details Applicant name First Name Surname Position Organisational department Department Name Phone number(s) Primary: Secondary: address P1 ACADEMIC Qualifications & APPOINTMENTS Academic Qualifications Eg: MBBS: Academic Appointments Eg: Senior Lecturer, XX Dept, UQ :
Place Cursor in the box above Select “Insert” tab on MSWord Toolbar Select “Object” and choose “Create from File” from drop down Browse for your PDF document Select Insert Select “Display as Icon” Click OK An icon of your Research Proposal content should be displayed in the box above. 4.2 ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 2 : BUDGET 4.2.1 BUDGET Proposal List all items individually (hit enter in the field to add additional lines) N.B. Funds must be expended within 2 years
T2 – Health application to evidence practice guidelines (Phase III clinical trials; observational studies; evidence synthesis and guidelines development) T3 – Practice guidelines to health practices (dissemination research; implementation research; diffusion research; Phase IV clinical trials) T4 – Practice to population health (outcomes research; population monitoring of morbidity; mortality; benefits and risk studies) Not applicable Definitions taken from 4.3.3 RESEARCH SIGNIFICANCE Using Plain English explain why this research is clinically significant ? (Maximum of ½ an A4 page) 4.4 ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 4: CLINICAL ORIGINALITY and INNOVATION In Plain English describe how your proposal is clinically original and / or innovative (Maximum of ½ an A4 page) 4.5 ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 5: Track Record - Relative to Opportunity 4.5.1 Principal Investigator (PI) (applicant) PI Contact Details Applicant name First Name Surname Position Organisational department Department Name number(s) Primary: Secondary: Email address P1 ACADEMIC Qualifications & APPOINTMENTS Academic Qualifications Eg: MBBS: Academic Appointments
Eg: Senior Lecturer, XX Dept, UQ : PI Research Time Expected 2019 time allocation to: This study (hr/wk): studies (hr/wk): Do you expect to have an extended period of absence during 2019? Yes No If Yes, provide expected DD/MM/YEAR - DD/MM/YEAR Reason (In ¼ A4 page or less) PI Publications List your publications produced in the last 5 years which have the most relevance to the study proposed in this application with ALL authors provided) Press <Enter> after each publication to maintain the numbering system PI Grants Provide details of research funding received in the last 5 years and indicate whether the funding relates to the proposed research of this application. If more than 8 please eliminate least applicable to this research proposal. Funding body and type Start date End date Amount Relevant to this application? [DD/MM/YYYY] [DD/MM/YYYY] $ Yes No [DD/MM/YYYY] [DD/MM/YYYY] $ Yes No [DD/MM/YYYY] [DD/MM/YYYY] $ Yes No [DD/MM/YYYY] [DD/MM/YYYY] $ Yes No [DD/MM/YYYY] [DD/MM/YYYY] $ Yes No [DD/MM/YYYY] [DD/MM/YYYY] $ Yes No [DD/MM/YYYY] [DD/MM/YYYY] $ Yes No [DD/MM/YYYY] [DD/MM/YYYY] $ Yes No
Conference presentations List research conference presentations you have delivered (maximum of 10) Presentation type Presentation title Conference name Location Date(s) Awards and Prizes List your six most significant awards or prizes obtained Awarding body Title Type Year Grants Provide details of research funding received in the last 5 years and indicate whether the funding relates to the proposed research of this application. If more than8 – please eliminate least applicable to this research proposal. Funding body and type date End date Amount Relevant to this application? [DD/MM/YYYY] [DD/MM/YYYY] $ Yes No [DD/MM/YYYY] [DD/MM/YYYY] $ Yes No [DD/MM/YYYY] [DD/MM/YYYY] $ Yes No [DD/MM/YYYY] [DD/MM/YYYY] $ Yes No
Appendix C: RSA Field Review Checklist The following checklists are intended for use in the field. These checklists are not but rather, are intended to help to prompt RSA participants about potential safety issues. Road Alignment and Cross Section Auxiliary Lanes Intersections Interchanges Visibility, sight distance Design speed Speed limit/ speed zoning Passing zones 'Readability' (perception) of the alignment by drivers Curves, superelevation Lane, shoulder, and roadway widths Shoulders (presence, type) Cross slopes Side slopes Drainage Presence/absence Tapers Signs and markings Traffic (through/turning) Location and type Visibility, sight distance Signing and marking Layout and 'readability' (perception) by drivers Pedestrians/ bicyclist accommodations Lighting (intersection, crosswalks) Corning/turning radii Channelized (vehicle speeds, signage, pedestrian crossings) Visibility, sight distance shoulders Signing, marking, delineation Pedestrians/ bicyclists crossings Lighting Acceleration/ deceleration lane lengths Merging conflicts Intersection control
Parking Provision for Heavy Vehicles Other Safety Issues Land Use and Access Type (parallel, head-in, back-in) Proximity to intersection/ crosswalk Demand/turnover Delineation Pavement/ shoulder quality Intersection design Lane width Landscaping (placement/type) Temporary features (pavement markings, barriers, signs) Headlight glare Roadside activities Driveway entrances/placement Driveways spacing and consolidation Mid-Block median opening(s) Land use/roadway compatibility (e.g. high speed roads through residential areas)
Waste practice Campus Curriculum Community Litter and stormwater Litter audit tools Litter audits are a great way to explore litter in a personalised local context. An audit will gather information that can be used to determine whether or not there is a litter issue at the school, and guide the actions that could be taken to address the issue (if present). litterless/litter-audit/ TeachWild is a national marine debris research and education program developed to better understand the global issue of marine debris and its impacts on Australian wildlife. The Victorian Litter Action Alliance Local Litter Measurement Toolkit (LLMT) provides data collection tools and techniques to evaluate litter programs, do a cost benefit analyses to improve litter prevention and prepare a business cases for litter funding. For further information visit Green purchasing CERES Hub “Green purchasing” or “green procurement” is when people or organisations buy products and services that minimise negative environmental impacts over their life-cycle of manufacturing, transportation, use and recycling or disposal. Australian Organic Schools promote the benefits of organic farming to make us aware of all the organic products we can buy when we go shopping. Shop Ethical The Shop Ethical and resources teach students about why and how to shop ethically. Through the website you can get the low-down on the environmental and social record of companies behind common brand names. Shop with a clear conscience disposal Understand more about waste and recycling in Victoria A of Waste provides an overview of waste and resource recovery in Victoria. To learn more about types of waste, regulatory settings, recycling, product stewardship schemes, energy recovery, advanced resource recovery technologies and more, download the booklet from the Metropolitan Waste and Resource Recovery Group website at The Schools Recycle Right Challenge is an initiative of National Recycling Week run by PlanetArk. You can download free recycling activity guides, lesson plans and Australian school event ideas, designed to engage students and teachers to learn by doing and having fun! The Getting Started Guide will help you plan and promote your Schools Recycle Right Challenge activities. Nude Food Day Encouraging students to bring food without unnecessary packaging or wrapping is great way to reduce litter at the school. It can also help educate students about healthy eating and sustainability. For information on how to get involved go to 12
*Try showing more than one possible solution. 3.3 Name _________________________ Date __________ *Try showing more than one possible solution. 3.3 Name _________________________ Date __________ Solve: 4 x 4 = 6 x 7 = *30 x 9 = 6 x 5 = 5 x 7 = *60 x 7 = 7 x 3 = 9 x 8 = *90 x 90 = 8 x 3 = 8 x 6 = *60 x 50 =
In 60.893, what digit is in the thousandths place? _____ In 83.591, what digit is in the tens place? _____ In 10.005, what digit is in the tenths place? _____ *In 2.6074, what is the value of the digit 4? _____ *In 26.0801, what is the of the digit 1? _____ 6.7 Name _________________________ Date __________ Look at the map of Ireland on journal page 161 and the map of a campground on journal page 162. Compare the grid systems on the maps. 6.8 Name _________________________ Date __________ Look at the map of Ireland on journal page 161 and the map of a campground on journal page 162. Compare the grid systems on the maps.
Name _________________________ Date ___________ Play Name that Number and record one round here. Use parentheses in your number sentences. *See if you can use nested parentheses in your number sentences. 12.4 Name _________________________ Date ___________ 12.5 Name _________________________ Date ___________ 12.5 Name _________________________ Date ___________
Further information Sustainability Victoria ResourceSmart Schools Department of Environment, Land, Water & Planning Schools Water Efficiency Program Victorian Water Corporations Barwon Water Central Highlands Water City West Water Coliban Water East Gippsland Water Gippsland Water Goulburn Valley Water Goulburn-Murray Water GWMWater Lower Murray Water Department of Education and Training Tools and Resources Cool Australia CERES Environment Education Australia Melbourne Water North East Water South East Water South Gippsland Water Southern Rural Water Wannon Western Water Westernport Water Valley Water National Water Organisations Australian Association WELS Irrigation Australia ACTEW Sydney Water SA Water Water Corporation of Western Australia
Regional Summer School Grading Policy Participation 25% of the total grade Rated on a scale of 1 – 4 per class per day 0 Absent – sent to intervention room 1 Unprepared – assignments not done 2 Prepared to participate – assignments done 3 Participation adequate – assignments done 4 Participation exceptional – assignments done Homework 25% of the total grade Tests/Quizzes/Final Projects 50% of the total grade Summer course average will be determined as outlined above. 3 week progress reports and report cards will be sent to the home districts and to parents/guardians. Districts will determine if credit can be awarded.
ROAD SAFETY STATISTICAL SUMMARY October 2015 TRANSPORT ACCIDENT COMMISSION 60 Brougham Street Geelong Vic 3220 PO Box 742 Geelong Vic 3220 Ausdoc DX 216079 Geelong Telephone 1300 654 329 STD Toll Free 1800 332 556 Fax: 03 9656 9300 ABN 22 033 947 623
Claims involving an acute hospital admission* (by claim acceptance date – rolling 12 month, to midnight 30 April 2015) Category 2015 2014 2013 2015 v 2014 2015 v 2013 5 Year Av Claims involving an acute hospitalisation over 14 days (Rolling 12 Month Total) 1,200 Victoria – Claims involving acute hospitalisation over 14 days Rolling 12 months 1,100 1,000 900 800 700 7,000 Victoria – All claims involving an acute hospital isation Rolling 12 months total 6,000 5,000 4,000 *An acute hospital admission refers to a hospital admission that occurred within 7 days of accident.
The National Picture State Fatalities (12 months to October) State per 10,000 registered vehicles (12 months to October) Fatalities per 100,000 population (12 months to October) Deaths per 100,000 population, Victoria v Australia 2000 - 2015 10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 Victoria Australia Victoria v Australia – 12 Month Moving Fatality Rate
Booze-Bus Random Breath Testing 12 months to September 2015 (monthly totals) 12 months to September 2015 vs previous 12 months Mobile Safety Camera Data Infringements Issued from Mobile Cameras (monthly totals) Monthly Average = 32,664 2014 2015 Excessive Speed Infringements (ESI) Issued from Mobile Cameras (monthly totals) Monthly Average = 303 2014 2015 Notes: An ESI is defined as 25km/h over the speed limit except in a 110km/h zone where it is 20km/h over the limit. Vehicles Assessed 4,500,000 4,000,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 % over Lim it 3.5% 3.0% 2.5% 2.0% 1.5% 1.0% 0.5% 0.0% % vehicles assessed 10 kph or more over speed limit Total Vehicles Assessed Mobile Safety Cameras – Vehicles assessed and percentage of vehicles assessed 10km/h or more over speed limit per month
Figures 500 Me lb ou rne C ou ntry 400 300 200 100 0 Graph 1a – Melbourne/country fatalities 5,000 Me lb ou rne C ou ntry 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 - Graph 1b – Melbourne/country Claims involving an acute hospital admission
180 160 D ea th s: Mel b D ea th s: To tal 140 D ea th s: Co un tr y 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 2a – Pedestrian fatalities (Melbourne/country) 400 350 D ea th s: Mel b D ea th s: Co un tr y 300 D ea th s: To tal 250 200 150 100 50 0 Graph 2b – Driver fatalities (Melbourne/country)
Dec 87 Dec 88 Dec 89 Dec 90 Dec 91 Dec 92 Dec 93 Dec 94 Dec 95 Dec 96 Dec 97 Dec 98 Dec 99 Dec 00 Dec 01 Dec 02 Dec 03 Dec 04 Dec 05 Dec 06 Dec 07 Dec 08 Dec 09 Dec 10 Dec 11 Dec 12 Dec 13 Dec 14 Dec 87 Dec 88 Dec 89 Dec 90 Dec 91 Dec 92 Dec 93 Dec 94 Dec 95 Dec 96 Dec 97 Dec 98 Dec 99 Dec 00 Dec 01 Dec 02 Dec 03 Dec 04 Dec 05 Dec 06 Dec 07 Dec 08 Dec 09 Dec 10 Dec 11 Dec 12 Dec 13 Dec 14
ROAD SAFETY STATISTICAL SUMMARY September 2015 TRANSPORT ACCIDENT COMMISSION 60 Brougham Street Geelong Vic 3220 PO Box 742 Geelong Vic 3220 Ausdoc DX 216079 Geelong Telephone 1300 654 329 STD Toll Free 1800 332 556 Fax: 03 9656 9300 ABN 22 033 947 623
Claims involving an hospital admission: 12 months to March 2015 (claim acceptance date) – Continued Category 2015 2014 2013 Police Service Area on Local Government Area (see p.13) 2015 v 2014 2015 v 2013 5 Year Av Note: excludes rejected claims and claims for interstate crashes
1,800 1,600 C la ims: Me lb C la ims: Co un try 1,400 C la ims: Tota l 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 - Graph 3c – Passenger Claims involving an acute hospital admission (Melbourne/country) 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 C la ims: Me lb C la ims: Co un try C la ims: Tota l - Graph 3d –Motorcyclist Claims involving an acute hospital admission (Melbourne/country)