EUG 26 No. 2 Urea Plant Fugitive PM EU ID Point ID EU Name UR2MSTG 26-9168 No. 2 Urea Materials Storage UR2MTRFR 26-9169 No. 2 Urea Materials Transfer UR2MLD 26-9170 No. 2 Urea Materials Loading EUG 27 New Haul Roads EU ID Point ID EU Name HAULRD --- No. 2 Urea Plant Vehicle Traffic Physically Modified Equipment EUG 2 Ammonia Plant Primary Reformers Location EU ID Point ID Heat Input* Manufacturer Construction Date Ammonia Plant #1 101B1 2-9095 1058 MMBTUH hourly 965 MMBTUH annual Kellogg 1973 Ammonia #2 101B2 2-9097 1338 MMBTUH hourly 990 MMBTUH annual Kellogg 1975 *Post-modification heat inputs. EUG 9 No. 2 Ammonia Plant Cooling Tower EU ID Point ID EU Name Capacity 22014B 9-9159 No. 2 Ammonia Plant Cooling Tower 65,700 GPM EUG 10 CO2 Stripping Towers Location EU ID Point ID EU Name/Model Manufacturer Construction Date Ammonia Plant #1 10-9120 CO2 Stripping Tower 1 (PV30-1) Kellogg 1973 Ammonia Plant #2 1102E2 10-9121 CO2 Stripping Tower 2 (PV30-2) Kellogg 1975 Units with Increased Utilization EUG 1 Plant-wide This EUG is established to address requirements that apply to the entire plant, including open burning restrictions, visible emissions, fugitive dust control. The plant is requesting to operate under a state and federally enforceable plant-wide cap for methanol, which is classified as a hazardous air pollutant (HAP). The process condensate stripper, the primary source of methanol emissions from this type of plant, is refluxed to the process rather than vented to the atmosphere. EUG 7 No. 1 Urea Synthesis Vents EU ID ID EU Name/Model Manufacturer Capacity Construction/ Modification Date HIC135 7-9111 High Pressure Vent Foster Wheeler 1,550 TPD 1980 / 2007 D119 7-9110 Low Pressure Vent Foster Wheeler 1,550 TPD 1980 / 2007
analysis for CO will focus on combustion units: the two modified reformers and the proposed new No. 2 Urea Plant boiler. CO emissions from combustion units are a function of oxygen availability (excess air), flame temperature, residence time at flame temperature, combustion zone design, and turbulence. Alternative CO control methods include exhaust gas cleanup methods such as catalytic oxidation, and front-end methods such as combustion control wherein CO formation is suppressed within the combustors. A search of EPA’s RBLC follows. It was noted that only two BACT determinations relied on an oxidative catalyst, while all others relied on good combustion. Non-feasibility of oxidative catalysts will be discussed later. Natural Gas Fired Primary Boilers > 250 MMBTUH – Carbon Monoxide RBLC ID Facility State Permit Issuance Date BACT Limit FL-0350 Port Dolphin Energy Florida 12/01/11 Good combustion practices, 0.015 lb/MMBTU CO IA-0105 Iowa Fertilizer Iowa 10/26/12 Good combustion practices, 0.0013 lb/MMBTU CO IA-0106 CF Industries – Port Neal Iowa 7/12/13 Oxidation catalyst, 0.0013 lb/MMBTU LA-0231 Lake Charles Gasification Louisiana 6/22/09 Good design and proper operation, 0.036 lb/MMBTU LA-0254 Ninemile Generating Louisiana 8/16/2011 Good combustion, natural gas fuel, 0.084 lb/MMBTU NE-0054 Cargill, Inc. Nebraska 3/01/13 Good combustion practices NV-0049 Harrah’s Operating Co. Nevada 8/20/09 Operation within mfg specs, 0.037 lb/MMBTU NV-0049 Harrah’s Operating Co. Nevada 8/20/09 Flue gas recirculation, 0.0705 lb/MMBTU NV-0049 Harrah’s Operating Co. Nevada 8/20/09 Operation within mfg specs, 0.0173 lb/MMBTU NV-0049 Harrah’s Operating Co. Nevada 8/20/09 Operation within mfg specs, 0.0172 lb/MMBTU NV-0049 Harrah’s Operating Co. Nevada 8/20/09 Operation within mfg 0.0073 lb/MMBTU
RBLC ID Facility Permit Issuance Date BACT NV-0049 Harrah’s Operating Co. Nevada 8/20/09 Operation within mfg 0.0075 lb/MMBTU NV-0049 Harrah’s Operating Co. Nevada 8/20/09 Operation within mfg 0.037 lb/MMBTU NV-0049 Harrah’s Operating Co. Nevada 8/20/09 Operation within mfg specs, 0.848 lb/MMBTU NV-0049 Harrah’s Operating Co. Nevada 8/20/09 Operation within mfg specs, 0.074 lb/MMBTU NV-0050 MGM Mirage Nevada 11/30/09 Good combustion practices, gas fuel, 0.0184 lb/MMBTU NV-0050 MGM Mirage Nevada 11/30/09 Good combustion practices, gas fuel, 0.0214 lb/MMBTU NV-0050 MGM Mirage Nevada 11/30/09 Good combustion practices, gas fuel, 0.0362 lb/MMBTU NV-0050 MGM Mirage Nevada 11/30/09 Good combustion practices, gas fuel, 0.037 lb/MMBTU NV-0050 MGM Mirage Nevada 11/30/09 Good combustion practices, gas fuel, 0.038 lb/MMBTU NV-0050 MGM Mirage Nevada 11/30/09 Good combustion practices, gas fuel, 0.0148 lb/MMBTU NV-0050 MGM Mirage Nevada 11/30/09 Good combustion practices, gas fuel, 0.035 lb/MMBTU SC-0091 Columbia Energy South Carolina 7/00/03 Good combustion, fuel, 0.06 lb/MMBTU Step 1. Identify Available Control Technologies The application identified two control technologies: Good combustion practices Catalytic oxidation While secondary non-catalytic oxidation could have been included in the listing, it would have been eliminated at the step of technical feasibility. The two listed options illustrate CO control adequately, either by preventing formation (good combustion practices) or by removal (catalytic
EUG 3 40 CFR 60, Subpart Dc Steam Generating Units 10-100 MMBTUH prior to the effective date EUG 11 40 CFR 60, Subpart G and Ga Nitric Acid Plants prior to the effective date EUG 13 40 CFR 60, Subpart A, 60.18 Not in source category EUG 5, 17 40 CFR 60, Subpart Kb Storage Vessels pressure of stored material below applicability threshold EUG 2 OAC 252:100-31-25 (c) Sulfur Compounds, Fuel and Emissions Monitoring not in source category EUG 4 and 23 OAC 252:100-33 Control of Emission of Nitrogen Oxides below the specified size EUG 5 and 17 OAC 252:100-37 Control of Emission of VOC below the specified vapor pressure EUG 6, 7, 9, 12, 13, 14, 14A, 16, 17, 21, 22, 25, 26, 27 OAC 252:100-19-4 PM Emissions from Fuel Burning Units not in source category EUG 5-17, 20-22, OAC 252:100-31 Control of Emission of Sulfur Compounds not in source category EUG 5-17, 20-22, OAC 252:100-33 Control of Emissions of Nitrogen not in source category EUG 6-17, 20-22, OAC 252:100-37 Control of Emission of VOC not in source category EUG 4, 7, 11, 12, 13, 15, 17 - 20 OAC 252:100-8, Part 7 Prevention of Significant Deterioration No changes have been made to trigger this requirements for these sources