zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning diverticular disease of the colon which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 3. The Instrument is assessed as a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. Human Rights Implications 4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including: the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'; the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICSECR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits; the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICSECR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members; the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR). Conclusion This Legislative Instrument is compatible with rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights. Repatriation Medical Authority
10. ROLE-PLAYERS, ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES NO. KEY BUSINESS PROCESS KEY PERFORMANCE MEASURE OBJECTIVES INPUT OUTPUT RESP. DOC REQ. 1. Allocation process 1.1 All new FBO's must register with the DAFF Exporting producers identified during export certification 100% of all exporting FBO's to register. FBO allocation Allocated FBO's FBO FBO application form 1.2 Completing of the application form and supply of supporting documentation No of returned applications to the FBO 100% accurately completed applications FBO information No delays in the allocation process FBO FBO application form 1.3 Processing new application for FBO codes within 10 working days from receipt of information Processing time: Once per fortnight 100% of applications processed within measure FBO application Uniquely allocated code communicated to the applicant DAFF: FSQA FBO application form 1.4 Verification of the application detail No wrongly allocated codes No duplication of codes & no allocation errors FBO allocation Accurate system DAFF: FSQA n/a 1.5 Update of the FBO system with new allocations 5 working days 100% of applications updated on website within the 5 working days FBO allocation Updated FBO system to be used by FBO's and assignee DAFF: FSQA n/a 1.6 Verification of FBO detail on site Verification of FBO detail whilst conducting food safety audits 100% accurate information on system FBO system Accurate system PPECB, APIS n/a 2. Update and maintenance of FBO system 2.1 Updates of all FBO information All FBO's to update their information 100% updated information Update of FBO information Accurate system DAFF n/a 2.2 Verification of FBO detail on site Verification of FBO detail whilst conducting food safety audits 100% accurate information on system FBO system Accurate system DAFF: IS n/a 3. Use of FBO Codes 3.1 All containers of produce destined for local and export must comply with the product standards and requirements PPECB EPI and inland rejections 100% Compliance FBO system Traceable containers/ products FBO / PPECB / DAFF Product standards and requirements. Non compliance FBO's
S. No Pay Scale Station of Hiring of House Rental Ceiling at the station No of houses hired during the month at the station Houses Hired and Rent Paid basis Advance less than one year (More than one month) One year advance Two Advance more than two years 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Extension of Lease (if any) Advance rent paid extension Number of Houses terminated during the month Remarks 11. 12. 13. 14. (Signature)
10. Amount paid to the affectees __________________________________________ 11. Additional funds required __________________________________________ Contd. Annexure-B (1) LAND Name of Affectees/Payee with NIC No. Total Land Amount of Compensation Including Interest due for payment Amount Paid with date and Voucher No. Amount Outstanding Remarks (2) STRUCTURES Name of Affectees/ Payee with NIC No. Type of Structure Covered Area Salient features Value assessed and approved Amount paid with date and voucher No. Amount Out standing Remarks (3) TREES Name of Affectees/ Payee with NIC No. Type Number & Area on planted Value assessed and approved Amount paid with date and voucher No. Amount Out standing Remarks (3) TREES Name of Affectees/ with NIC No. Type & kind of crop Value assessed and approved Amount paid with date and voucher No. Amount Out standing Remarks SUMMARY Land Structure Trees Crops Total 1 Total value assessed and approved 2 Total funds received 3 Total funds paid
NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY STATEMENT OF REQUIRED Name of Project: ___________________________________________________________________________________________ (1) LAND Total Land Required Total Land Acquired Land taken in possession Total value agreed Total funds allocated Amount Disbursed Balance Available Addl. Required funds including interest Remarks (if any) (2) Total value of structure/ trees/ crops assessed and approved Funds Allocated Amount paid to the affectees Balance Amount Available Additional funds Required Remarks SUMMARY PRIORITY WISE REQUIREMENTS OF FUNDS More than 5 years old liabilities 3 Years old liabilities One year old liabilities Current liabilities Total Amount required Remarks Land Obstructions Land Obst Land Obst Land Obst Immediately Required Funds: _________________________ (Signature) General Manager (Region)
NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY PROJECT WISE MONTHLY STATEMENT OF LAND ACQUISITION Name of Region ________________________ Name of Project: ____________________ Month _________________ Name of Mauzal Deh with Tehsil & District where land acquired Total estimated land required for the project Total cost of Land Total land transferred to NHA (attach form with the return) Amount paid Remarks Land Damages (Signature)
Annexure-A Clause 9.19 REGISTER/RETURN OF ADVERTISING BOARDS INSTALLED IN REGION DURING THE OF Name of Owner/Company Size of Board Location where Board is intalled Maint Unit Contract period with dates Approving Authority Amount of Lease Rent fixed Amount of Rent received Boards removed on completion of contract Boards removed due to violation of contract Remarks (if any)
Electronic walk through gates. Construction of helipad on need basis. -------------------- Annex-A NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY FINANCIAL MATTERS BUDGETARY ALLOCATION Description Account Head Remarks 1. CLASSIFIED ADVERTISEMENTS a. Related to Projects Respective Project If are not available in respective project, the amount may be paid from main receipt account, with the approval of Chairman. b. Functions of NHA 1% If it relates to the project, expenditure be charged to the relevant project. c. Operation Wing RMA --------- d. Regional Offices Concerned Region --------- OTHER ADVERTISEMENTS/CAMPAIGNS 2. Awareness Campaign RMA --------- 3. Groundbreaking/Inauguration Respective Project If are not available in respective project, the amount may be paid from feasibility studies head with the approval of Chairman. 4. Display Advertisement RMA/1% Subject to availability of budget & prior concurrence by Member (Finance). 5. Electronic Campaign RMA/1% Subject to availability of budget & prior concurrence by Member (Finance). ----------------
1.2.4 GM(CONSTRUCTION/OPERATIONS) HEAD OFFICE PROCESS THE IPC FOR APPROVAL BY MEMBER (OPERATIONS) Member (Operation) will approve the payment of IPC based upon the submission by the contractor, verification and correctness of the IPC in accordance with contractual provisions by the consultant and authentication by the Project Director and the General Manager (Construction/Operations). The approved case shall be forwarded by Member (Operation) to the concerned Assistant Director (Accounts), with a copy to the computer section the Finance Wing for recording of the IPC in the liability list and for issuance of a control number, to the Accounts Section and the office of General Manager (Construction/Operations). Status of the PC-I Allocations (PSDP) and expenditures Source of funding, if PSDP is not available along with approval of the Member (Finance). Commencement Date. Validity of time extension. Approved Variation Orders or status / time frame. Recovery of MOB Advance. Validity of Bank Guarantees. Ensure that the requirements as per SOP have been completed 100% by the contractor, consultant and the Project Director. Intimation of the due date for payment as per contract provision. Submit to Member (Operations) for approval. The General Manager (Construction/Operations) office will ensure to forward the approved case to Accounts Section at seven days before the due date. 1.2.5 MEMBER (OPERATIONS) TO SEND SUMMARY SHEET CONVEYING APPROVAL FOR PROCESSING THE PAYMENT Member (Operations) will approve the payment of IPC based upon the submission by the contractor, verification and correctness of the IPC in accordance with contractual provisions by the consultant and authentication by the Project Director and the General Manager (Construction/Operations). The approved case shall be forwarded by Member (Operation) to the concerned Assistant Director (Accounts), with a copy to the computer section of the Finance Wing for recording of the IPC in the liability list and for issuance of a control number, to the Accounts Section and the office of General Manager (Construction/Operations).
e. Journalists / Correspondents / Men: Many people in this category come and stay in Pakistan. These people normally stay in the capital city or in other major cities but some of them do take the adventure of visiting difficult and remote parts of the country to gain the first hand knowledge of the events of law and order or some political activity. Some of them being more daing/ sensational expose themselves unnecessarily to the dangerous environment while trying to unearth some criminal or terrorist. Ministry of information must coordinate their security with Law Enforcing Agencies (LEAs) and they must be told the dangers of being more adventurous. Responsibility of Security The responsibility of security must not only be thrown on the Law Enforcing Agencies (LEAs) alone but others, who are responsible for the presence of any oreigner in this country, should also share it. Following guidelines must be kept in mind. Any government department or ministry sponsoring foreigners should be responsible to coordinate their security with LEAs through Ministry of Interior. Sponsor should exclusively depute an officer for this purpose and itmust not only be a routine letter writing exercise. Generally, writing a letter those who are responsible think that they have fulfilled their responsibility. This trend has to be curbed. Any private company/firm/department sponsoring foreigners must be made responsible of the security of their guests through private security guards. If the project is of national importance, they can request the provincial government through Ministry of Interior, for the provision of security. Ministry of Tourism and Ministry of information should be made responsible to coordinate security arrangements of foreign tourists and media mend with the Ministry of Interior and provincial governments. Ministry of Tourism should coordinate with provincial tourism departments and LEAs for the security of foreign tourists. Security Apparatus The fact is that our security apparatus is outdated and overloaded. Because of the overload, the system has become insensitive. It cannot react in any crisis within the required timeframe. There is a dire need to address this issue seriously. A lot has been done on policy level; now there is a need to correct the system at implementation level. For instance, the induction, training, perks and safety aspect of the security personnel be improved.
ROBERT BROWN ASSOCIATES Economic and Financial Consultants VIGNESGRANDES 82150 5TBEAUZEIL TARN et GARONNE FRANCE 33563952255 20th October, 2008 S.A.LATIF Member (Planning) NHA. Islamabad. Pakistan. Dear Sir, Subject: NHA Private Provision of Infrastructure (PPI/PPP) Policy In Highways. In 2095 under an ADB small scale Technical Assistance a report was prepared on Facilitating Public Private Partnership in Highway. Motorway Bridge and Tunnel construction in Pakistan. The Technical Assistance team comprised the following interactional experts: i. Dr. Hal Sullivan PPP Expert/Team Leader ii. Robert Brown PPP Financial Expert iii. ZahirRiaz Legal Policy Expert During the TA a "Draft Policy and Regulatory Framework" was prepared for Private Sector participation in National Highways. motorways. Tunnels and Bridges in Pakistan.The draft policy was prepared with NHA and discussed with stakeholders at several seminars &workshops. The above consultants assisted NHA to produce this comprehensive revised policy & Regulatory Framework. During the course of consultancy work the draft policy was thoroughly vetted over all legal, financial and procedural aspects of PPP. In addition, in 2008, I assisted under further ADB Technical Assistance the MOF, IPDF and the Ministry of Railways in Pakistan to develop further their policy frameworks in PPP.
achievement of Financial Close. Detailed Design Approval of Detailed Design as per requirement of the Concession Agreement Member (Planning) through GM(Design) Financing Agreements / Financial Approval of Financing Agreements/Financial Close Member (Finance) Phase-II: Construction Land matters, shifting of utilities and all construction activities. Member (Construction) through GM(C)HQ/Project / Region &PDs Operation Phase Ensure smooth operations o the facilities. Member (Operations) through concerned Regional GMs 3. Posting of Following officers are transferred and posted to PPP Cell, with immediate effect, to perform as a unit under General Manager (PPP) and Member (Motorway/PPP) for undertaking the procurement activities. Sr. # Name with Designation Presenting Posting New Posting a. Mr. Ijaz Dy. Director (Engineer) Dy. Director (P&CA) NHA HQs Dy. Director (PPP) b. Mr. AsadRahat Dy. Director (Engineer) Dy. Director (Weigh Station) Operation Wing, NHA HQs Dy. Director (PPP) c. Mr. Mohsin Islam Assistant Director (Engineer) AD (Construction) NHA HQs Assistant Director (PPP) d. Mr. Muhammad Atif Sheikh Assistant Director AD (Finance) NHA HQs Assistant Director (PPP) 4. The Director (Finance) and Director (Legal), NHA HQs will support to Public Private Partnership (PPP) Cell in addition to their own duties on as and when need basis. 5. Office the space for the officers will be made available by the Establishment Wing of NHA HQs. 6. Necessary relieving/joining reports of officers mentioned in Para-3 above may be forwarded to this office for record, please. AbdualWaheed General Manager (Admn) Copy to:- All Members, NHA Secretary, NHA
Notifier details (Laboratory staff) Name and Surname: Designation: Hospital/Clinic: Address: Province: Tel: Cell: Email: Alternative contact details: Patient details Patient name: Date of birth: Age: Sex: Hospital number: Referring laboratory: Specimen and testing details Specimen type: Date specimen collected: Specimen laboratory number: Assays/tests used for ID confirmation (please list all): Assay/test used for AST: AST results EUCAST MIC by E-test (µg/ml) Antibiotic / Breakpoint Disc diffusion (mm) Antibiotic / Zone diameter (mm)
Notifying health care provider’s details Name and surname: Health Care Facility: Designation: Contact number (landline): Mobile number: SANC/HPCSA number: Patient demographics Full name Surname SA ID number Passport/other ID number Citizenship Date of Age Gender Sexual orientation Hospital number Is patient pregnant? Residential address Patient contact number Alternative contact details Medical condition details Date of symptom onset Date of diagnosis Patient admission status Clinical symptoms relating to the condition Treatment given for condition
19. APPLICATION OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT INSTRUCTIONS IN NHA Where these SOPs are silent or specifically directed for Autonomous Bodies, instructions of the Federal Government on the subject matter shall also be applicable. 2. This issues with the approval of the Chairman NHA. (ALI AKBAR MEMON) Director (Establishment) Distribution:- Members, NHA (All) Secretary, NHA DG (Admn), NHA General Managers, NHA (HQ/Regions/Projects) (All) Directors, NHA: Personnel, Coordination, Inspection, Legal, PR, MIS & MPO. Deputy Directors (Admn), NHA, Lahore Multan, Abbottabad & Peshawar. ADs (Admn), NHA, Karachi & Quetta PS to Chairman NHA Telephone Exchange, NHA HQ Appendix-A NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY Application for Installation / Provision of Official Telephone / Cellular Connection 1. Name of Employee: 2. Post / Designation & BS: 3. of Posting: 4. Nature of appointment: Regular / Deputation / Contract 5. Status of Post held: Regular / Deputation / Contract 6. Telephone Connection required for: Office / Residence 7. Place / full address where telephone is required:
PURPOSE This document describes the procedures for the review and certification of studies that must comply with the NIH Genomic Data Sharing (GDS) Policy or the NIH Genome Wide Association Studies Policy. , , and for more information. LEVEL OF REVIEW NIH requires that an IRB, privacy board, and/or equivalent body review and certify an investigator’s proposal for the submission of large-scale human or non-human genomic data to NIH Data Repositories. UW interprets this to mean that the review may be done by the full (convened) committee or by a designated member of the IRB, as follows: Full Committee Review For applications that require review by a full committee, the request for GDS certification will be reviewed by the full committee. Modifications to existing approved research are brought to the full when appropriate, but may be reviewed by expedited procedures when they meet the definition of a Minor Change is met (see SOP Modifications Section 3.1). Expedited Review For applications that qualify for expedited review (per 45 CFR 46.110 21 CFR 56.110), the request for GDS certification will be reviewed by a designated member of the IRB. This is applicable to initial submissions as well as to modifications of existing approved research. Not Subjects Research Requests for GDS certification of data from a research study that does not involve human subjects will be reviewed for a not human subjects determination and GDS certification in tandem by a designated member of the IRB. External Review Requests for GDS certification of data from a research study for which the University of Washington is relying on the IRB review of another institution by means of an IRB Authorization Agreement (including cooperative agreements and agreement/contracts with a central IRB) are reviewed by a designated member of the UW IRB.
Winter Wonderland Sleigh ring, are you listening, In the lane, snow is glistening A beautiful sight, We're happy tonight. Walking in a winter wonderland. Gone away is the bluebird, Here to stay is a new bird He sings a love song, As we go along, Walking in a winter wonderland. In the meadow we can build a snowman, And pretend that he's a circus clown We'll have lots of fun with mister snowman, Until the other kids knock him down. When it snows, ain't it thrilling, When your nose gets a chilling We'll frolic and play, the Eskimo way, Walking in a winter wonderland. Walking in a winter wonderland. Walking in a winter wonderland. Walking in a winter wonderland. Must Be Santa Who's got a beard that's long and white? Santa's got a beard that's long and white.
MONEYLINE SECURITIES (PRIVATE) LIMITED KNOWYOUR CUSTOMER (KYC) ANDCUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE (CDD) POLICES AND PORCEDURES Document ID MLine KYC/CDD Title Know Your Customer (KYC) and Customer Due Diligence (CDD) policies and procedures Print Date 12/12/2014 Revision 0.1 Prepared By : Dr.SAQIB (Compliance Officer/Director) Date Prepared 02/12/2014 Effective Date: 01/01/2015 Approved By: Reviewed By : (CEO) Reviewed By : (CFO) Date Reviewed 21/12/2014 Date Reviewed 22/12/2014 CEO CFO BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DOCUMENT CONTROL (Author to complete this page and update following ratification) Reference Number Version 1.6 Status FINAL Author Debbie Amendments Approving body Senior Management Team, Primary Dental Care Service Equality impact assessment Impact Part 1 Date: Ratification body Senior Management Group or Trust Board (delete as appropriate.) 06.09.2017 Date of 06.09.2017 Review date 06.09.2020 Contact for review Debbie Lewis, Specialist in Special Care Dentistry Lead Director Ethna Bashford, Service Director, Children, Young People, Families and Dental CONTRIBUTION LIST Key individuals involved in developing the document Name Designation or Debbie Lewis Specialist in Special Care Dentistry Camilla Boynton Senior Dental Officer and Specialist in Special Care Dentistry Brooke Zaidman Specialty Registrar in Special Care Dentistry Lorna Hollingsworth Associate Clinical Director and Specialist in Special Care Dentistry Andy Sprod Clinical Director Patricia Thresh Assistant Clinical Director Syed Ahmed Lead Clinician and Specialist in Special Care Dentistry Patrick Dixon Senior Dental Officer and DwSI Oral Surgery CONTENTS Section Title of Section Page Document Control Contribution List Contents Document Summary 4 trial
N/A 3. Qualifications (Please refer to guidance document for an outline of required qualifications) Professional/Vocational or Technical Qualifications Awarding Body Date Obtained BSc with Hons in Psychology & Sociology Masters in Social Work Certificate of Qualification in Social Work Practice Teaching Award Mental Health Social Work Award Post Qualifying Award in Social Work Diploma in Health & Social Services Management Advanced Award in Social Work of Ulster University Belfast of Ulster 01.06.86 14.06.91 14.06.91 23.09.94 04.06.88 23.04.99 01.06.05 20.05.08 01.06.10 4. Details of Registration with Professional Body
National trends in regulatory oversight and focus. For example, national communications from the federal human subjects regulatory agencies may make it clear that they are currently focusing on issues related to children in research. New information about specific risks. For example, highly publicized complaints by individuals about the use of their research samples for genetic analyses in unrelated studies across the country might suggest that the QA program examine the information provided to subjects in consent forms for UW genetics research. Prioritization and selection. The regulatory affairs team meets periodically to collate and discuss possible QA activities. About once per quarter, the team develops a slate of recommendations about QA needs, priorities, scope of specific QA activities, and resource needs. Prioritization criteria include (but are not limited to): External requirements Risk of serious non-compliance Risk of harm to subjects Institutional risk The extent of a possible problem across HSD or the IRBs About once per quarter, the recommendations are presented to the management team for discussion. The recommendations are generally accepted except when: There are resource constraints. The HSD Director has identified an urgent need that requires a higher priority. The quarterly QA plan can be revised in response to urgent issues. The QA plan may or may not change from one quarter to next, depending upon size and length of specific projects and other demands on the regulatory affairs team. Methods of assessment and monitoring. The regulatory affairs team draws upon a variety of methods for assessment and monitoring. These include (but are not limited to): Reports and data from the HSD database and Zipline, the electronic submission system Examination of IRB study files and other IRB documents (e.g., meeting minutes) Examination of HSD files and documents Interviews with HSD staff or IRB members Observation of IRB meetings Who conducts assessment and monitoring? The regulatory affairs team does much of the assessment and monitoring but may draw upon other HSD staff (and from outside of HSD), as needed and appropriate for the scope, size, and subject matter of projects.
The Border Builder Carol Rumens (1944-) No sooner had one come down Than he began building again. My bricks, O my genuine bricks Made of my genuine blood! What would we be without borders? So which one are you? he said And stuck out his hand to me. Birth certificate? Passport? Which side are you on, which side? Merrily he unrolled Starry dendrons of wire To give his wall ears and eyes. Qualifications? he said. Residence permit? Tattoo? Which colour are you, which colour? No colour, he said, no good. He took my only passport, He slammed it down on the wire. My hand, O my genuine hand! This is a border, he said. A border likes blood. Which side’s Your bloody hand on, which side?
If correct, proceed with sending the email reminders. If not correct, stop and email and request a corrected mail merge document. Click the Merge to Email button at the top of your screen. Or, if your screen does not display this button, click the Finish & Merge button at the top of your screen and then click on the selection to send email. In the to E-mail dialogue box, select “Email” from the “To:” field. The subject line should already be pre-populated with an appropriate message. If it is not, see section 5.3.1.1 (above). Click OK. The mail merge document will send an email to each of the email addresses in the record set. Verify that copies of the email messages are present in the “Sent Mail” folder in Outlook. This confirms that the reminders have been sent. Click the X at the top right of the screen to close the document. Click “Don’t save” when the dialogue appears and asks “Do you want to save changes?” Sending the Six (6) Week Reminder. Open the Six (6) Week Reminder mail merge document: F:\Reminder System\New Reminder Notifications\REMINDER(2) – 6 Week.doc Repeat steps 5.5.2 through 5.5.10. Sending the Expiration and Closure Reminder. Open the Expiration Notice mail merge document: F:\Reminder System\New Reminder Notifications\REMINDER(3) – Expiration and Closure.doc Repeat 5.5.2 through 5.5.8. the Merge to Printer button at the top of your screen. Or, if your screen does not display this button, click the Finish & Merge button at the top of your screen and then click on the selection to print.
Section 4: Personal Protective Equipment All work in laboratories must be performed under the guidelines for appropriate laboratory attire, as defined by the MSU Chemical Hygiene Plan: Close-toe shoes Long pants or long skirt covering the legs from the waist to the top of shoes Safety glasses or goggles, as appropriate In addition, flame resistant (FR) lab coats must be worn when working with flammable materials, including flammable gas. State where PPE for this procedure can be found in the laboratory Section 5: Engineering Controls Describe engineering controls that will be used to prevent explosions and fires such as flame arrestors, restricted flow orifices, intrinsically safe regulators, gas cabinets(if necessary) Please note: Flammable gases must be kept 20ft or more away from oxidizing gases/oxygen cylinders. Pyrophoric gases (such as silane) have specialized equipment requirements. Please contact Genevieve Cottrell at 432-8715 for more information Acetylene gas has unique properties, requiring specialized equipment. to the Acetylene SOP for more information. Mixing of flammable gases and oxygen in secondary containers or in processes is prohibited Section 6: Special Handling and Storage Requirements Describe how the gas cylinder will be secured Describe how the experimental apparatus will be tested with an inert, non-toxic gas (“dry-run”) before attaching the flammable gas cylinder, if appropriate Describe how the system will be tested for leaks, and the preventive maintenance schedule for leak testing Typical leak points are the packing nut, the threads, the collar, the pressure relief device, the regulator, and other attachments. If a leak is found, tighten the connection from which acetylene is leaking. Remember that the regulator connection is a left-handed thread and must be turned to the left to be tightened List anticipated purchase amounts, and maximum amounts of flammable gas expected to be in the laboratory at any time. Note: The maximum allowable aggregate quantity of flammable gas in a laboratory is 1000ft3. Please contact Genevieve Cottrell at 432-8715 if quantities larger than 1000ft3 are necessary
Stock Register Raw/Packaging Material Format No. SPL/WH/017 Maximum Quantity________________ RATES NAME OF ARTICLE _________________ 1.__________ 2._________ Minimum Quantity________________ 3.__________ 4._________ Date Manufacturer’s & Supplier’s Name MFG DT. EXP. DT. BILL No. BATCH No. QTY RCVD ISSUE DT. Product Name Batch No. A.R. No. Issued Qty Balance Remarks
Daily Dispatch Summary Format No. SPL/WH/023 D.I. No.: Date: Recd. On.: Date Time Party Name Invoice No. Qty. Allocated Product Name Colour Code B. No. Mfd. date Expiry date Pack Size Qty dispatch. (Nos.) Sale PS
Uniform Inspection Date: _____________________ Company: B C D Failure to wear uniform as directed. Piercing(s) : tongue, ears, , or face Beret: Not clean, shaved, or formed Hair: Not to standard Improper shave or sideburns Unauthorized makeup or nail polish Unauthorized jewelry (per piece) Un Uniform: Dirty / wrinkled (each piece) Fingernails: Not Clean & Trimmed Footwear: Dirty Brass: Dirty/tarnished (5 pts. Per item) Improper Placement (per item) Missing Item (5 points per item) Gig Line Off Total Penalty Points Name (Last) 100 20 20 20 20 10 10 10 10 10 5 5 5 5
Closeout Report I. Site Information Site Name: NCI Protocol Number: NCI Protocol Title: Visit Date(s): From: To: Visit Modality: Visit Conducted By: II. Visit Participants Name Role III. Closeout Checklist Completion Instructions: Mark each item as Yes, verified and compliant; No, unable to verify or noncompliant; Not Applicable; or, Not Reviewed. Provide comments for items marked No, and as indicated.
III. Study Initiation Meeting Checklist Completion Instructions Mark each item below as: Yes, item verified and/or discussed; No, unable to verify and/or discuss item; Not Applicable; or, Not Reviewed. Provide comments for items marked No, or whenever necessary or helpful. Review of Study ITEMS VERIFIED and/or DISCUSSED RESPONSE COMMENTS Background and Purpose of Study Study Objectives, Endpoints, and Design Clinical and Laboratory Evaluations Schedule of Evaluations, and Windows Enrollment ITEMS VERIFIED and/or DISCUSSED RESPONSE COMMENTS Informed Consent Process Screening/Pre-Entry Period No Exemptions Registration/Randomization Recruitment/Retention Anticipated Start of Enrollment Pharmacy ITEMS VERIFIED and/or DISCUSSED RESPONSE COMMENTS Study Drug Availability Study Drug Packaging and Labeling Study Drug Storage Study Drug Accountability and Use of DARF Staff Roles and Responsibilities
Equipment required in addition to normal tools or materials 200 micron polythene sheeting & duct tape; Warning tape , barricades and safety signage PVA glue Paint conforming to the job specification. E.g. Fire resistant if required Type H Vacuum Cleaner Low pressure paint spray bottle or roller/brush Bucket of water, rags and wet wipes Suitable asbestos waste container E.g Labelled 200 micron asbestos waste bag Bucket of water, rags and wet wipes Suitable asbestos waste container (eg- labelled 200 micron asbestos waste bag Appropriate task lighting Referenced Documents QUT Asbestos Materials Management Plan PLN805_010; Qld WH & S Regulations; Code of Practice for the Safe Removal of Asbestos [ NOHSC:2002(2005)]; Code Of Practice for management and control of asbestos in workplaces (2005)]
Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, Gunnison National Forests Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Expected Implementation Project Contact Crested Butte Mountain Resort (CBMR) - Proposed Teo Drainage & Summer Use Improvements EIS *UPDATED* - Recreation management - Special use management In Progress: DEIS NOA in Federal Register 11/05/2015 Est. FEIS NOA in Federal Register 08/2017 06/2018 Drendel 719-657-6019 Description: CBMR has formally requested site-specific review and analysis under NEPA procedures for elements of the Master Development Plan that was accepted by the Forest Service in 2013. See item 23 for more information. Web Link: Location: UNIT - Gunnison Ranger District. STATE - Colorado. COUNTY - Gunnison. LEGAL - T13S, R86W, Sec 29, 30, 31, 25, 36. Crested Butte Mountain Resort. Pitkin Travel Proposal EA *UPDATED* - Recreation management - Road management In Progress: Comment Period Public Notice 12/10/2015 06/2016 John Murphy 719-852-6221 Description: Pitkin Advocates have submitted a proposal to revisit 2010 Gunnison Basin Federal Lands Travel Management decision regarding specific routes near Pitkin, Colorado. Web Link: Location: UNIT - Gunnison Ranger District. STATE - Colorado. COUNTY - Gunnison. LEGAL - T 50 N, 4 and 5 E and T 49 N, R 3 E, NMPM. Pitkin Colorado Area. Medicine Bow/Routt National Forest Project Name Project Purpose Decision Project Contact West Side Snowy Range Travel Management Environmental Analysis EA - Recreation management In Brian Waugh 307-326-2525 bwaugh@fs.fed.us
Description: Changing National Forest System Road (FSR) 669.2c from maintenance level open to the public motorized to maintenance level USFS administration. FSR 669.2c will remain open to non-motorized recreation opportunities. Web Link: Location: UNIT - South Park Ranger District. STATE - Colorado. COUNTY - Park. LEGAL - T9S. R77W. Section 9. T9S. R77W. Section 9. Also, see attached map. Tie Hack Road to Trail Conversion (FSR 182) EA - In Sheila Lamb 719-836-2031 slamb@fs.fed.us
ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forest Recreational Sport Shooting Project EA *UPDATED* - - In Nehalem Clark 970-346-5008 ncclark@fs.fed.us a 2 R 5 E 6 1
Standard Operating Procedure Benzene This is an SOP template and is not complete until: 1) lab specific information is entered into the box below 2) lab specific protocol/procedure is added to the protocol/procedure section and 3) SOP has been signed and dated by the PI and relevant lab personnel. Print a copy and insert into your Lab-Specific Chemical Hygiene Plan. Section 1 – Lab-Specific Information Building/Room(s) covered by this SOP: Department: Principal Investigator Name: Principal Investigator Signature: Section 2 – Hazards Benzene is an OSHA regulated carcinogen. It is a highly flammable liquid and may form explosive mixtures with air. It can be harmful if inhaled, causing respiratory irritation. Benzene is harmful if absorbed through skin and causes eye and skin irritation. It may cause cancer and genetic defects. Exposure Limits: OSHA PEL (8 HR. TWA): 0.5 ppm OSHA Short Term Exposure Limit: 1 ppm ACGIH TLV/TWA: 0.1 ppm Section 3 – Engineering Controls and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Engineering Controls: Benzene should be used in a properly functioning chemical fume hood whenever possible. The chemical fume hood must be approved and certified by REM and have a face velocity between 80 – 125 feet per minute. Hygiene Measures: contact with skin, eyes, and clothing. Wash hands before breaks and immediately after handling the product. Hand Protection: Chemical-resistant gloves must be worn, nitrile gloves are recommended for low volume applications. Wearing two pairs of nitrile gloves is recommended. If handling a high volume (> 1 liters) of Benzene, then disposable gloves are likely not suitable; a more heavy duty glove such as a butyl rubber is required. NOTE: Consult with your preferred glove manufacturer to ensure that the gloves you plan on using are compatible with the specific chemical being used.
Small Boat SOPEP Instructions General Understanding: This instructional form has been created to help small boat fleet operators develop SOPEPs for their vessels. This form has been structured to have an “At a Glance” section that is a condensed version of the full SOPEP with the vital contacts. The contact information is greatly expanded upon in the sections following it that provide more than the essential contacts in the event of a spill. It is important to note that not all the contacts are considered vital, not because they are not all important, but in an emergency response, the contacts that can help in the clean-up are prioritized. Then, the contacts that need to simply be notified can be called later after the incident is brought under control; this time frame is usually within the first 24 hours after the incident has occurred. Section 1: SOPEP at a Glance This section’s purpose is providing the basic information on the vessel that will be vital in a spill. These details must be correct for this section to be helpful in expediting a spill clean-up. Length Search the construction specifics for the exact lengths and put in English units (feet, inches, gallons, etc.) Oil and Hydraulic Fuels It is also very important to share the exact type of hydraulic and fuels used onboard and their exact quantities on the vessel. You must count the oil amounts if you store the canisters onboard. If the canisters of oils are stored on the shore, then they should not be counted in the amount of oil onboard in this section. Any oil amounts less than 1 gallon onboard do not have to have a 95% calculation, but all types of oils used onboard should be noted. Ex. Compressor units: OIL-0007 Bauer Compressor Synthetic Oil (1 gallon) The 95% calculation is for large amount onboard and should be an exact calculation. Ex. Quantity of fuel onboard when 95% full: 1615 gallons full: 1700 gallons Pipe Specifics Additionally, all pipe specifics should be measured exactly with a tape measurer and note whether the attachment is a male or female connector. These small measurements will be key in removing fuel (lightering) if this becomes a viable method to limit spill damage. Precious time can be lost if sizes are estimated and new gear is needed to start the process. Ex. Lightering: 2” Camlock (male)
Standard Operating Procedure Formaldehyde Solution This is an SOP template and is not complete until: 1) lab specific information is entered into the box below 2) lab specific protocol is added to the protocol section and 3) SOP has been signed and dated by the PI and relevant lab personnel. Print a copy and insert into your Lab-Specific Chemical Hygiene Plan. Section 1 – Lab-Specific Information Building/Room(s) covered by this SOP: Department: Principal Investigator Name: Principal Investigator Signature: Section 2 – Hazards Formaldehyde is classified by OSHA as a combustible liquid, target organ effect, toxic by inhalation, toxic by ingestion, toxic by skin absorption, skin sensitizer, corrosive, and carcinogen. Do not breathe dust, fumes, gas, vapor, mist, or spray. Toxic if inhaled. Material is extremely destructive to the tissues of the mucous membranes and upper respiratory tract. Causes eye burns. Approximately 1.5 grams of vaporized Formaldehyde will achieve this concentration in a typical laboratory setting. The odor threshold of formaldehyde is reported to be as low as 0.1 ppm. Exposure Limits: OSHA PEL (8 HR. TWA): 0.75 ppm OSHA Short Term Exposure Limit: 2 ppm ACGIH TLV/TWA: 0.3 ppm Section 3 – Engineering Controls and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Engineering Controls: Use of formaldehyde should be conducted in a properly functioning chemical fume hood whenever possible. The chemical fume hood must be approved and certified by REM and have a face velocity between 80 – 125 feet per minute. Hygiene Measures: Avoid contact with skin, eyes, and clothing. Wash hands before breaks and immediately after handling the product. Hand Protection: Chemical-resistant gloves must be worn, nitrile gloves are recommended for low volume applications. Wearing two pairs of nitrile gloves is recommended. NOTE: Consult with your preferred glove manufacturer to ensure that the gloves you plan on using are compatible with the specific chemical being used.
Week Co:- Daily Device Stock Take XXXXXX Ward, XXXXXXXX Day/Date/Time All devices present and in working order 1 – 25 Please circle below as appropriate If NO, Please see SOP for action required. Please detail and follow up until current situation resolved Print Name Signature Monday/ YES / NO Tuesday/ Wednesday/ Thursday/ Friday/ Saturday/
So a rate for the Engela example be calculated as follows: numerator (a sub-part of the denominator or population) } The number of measles infection occurrences in children under-5 denominator (the population at risk) } The population under-5 at risk in Engela during a fixed period TASK 1 – What data is needed to calculate rates? Read the rest of the newspaper article on the measles outbreak in Namibia and then answer the questions that follow. 1. Why do you think the data in this newspaper article is given as absolute numbers? 2. What proportions are provided by the report? Are they and why or why not? 3. What is the significance of proportions in addressing the problem?
Contents 1 Learning outcomes for this session 2 Readings 3 Non-communicable diseases and risk factors 4 Responding to the challenges of NCDs 5 Session summary 6 References and further reading 1 LEARNING OUTCOMES OF THIS SESSION By the end of this session, you should be able to: Explain key concepts in relation to a range of non-communicable diseases. Demonstrate an understanding of the risk factors for non-communicable diseases. Demonstrate an understanding of the role of social determinants on diseases. Present evidence of familiarity with prevention and control measures for diseases. 2 READINGS Author/s Publication Details Beaglehole, R., J., Patel, V., Chopra, M., Ebrahim, S., Kidd, M. & Haines, A. (2008). Improving Prevention and Management of Chronic Disease in Low-income and Middle-income Countries: A Priority for Primary Health Care. Lancet, 372: 940–949. Lucas, A. O. & Gilles, H. M. (2003). Ch 8 – Non-communicable disease: Health in Transition. Textbook of Public Health Medicine for the Tropics. 4th ed. London: Arnold Publishers: 235–236. Puoane, T., Tsolekile, L., Sanders, D. & Parker, W. (2008). Chronic non-communicable diseases. African Health Review. Durban: Health Systems Trust: 73–87. Also available [Online]: http://hst.org.za/uploads/files/cont_ack_08.pdf Downloaded: 03 / 12/09
CONTENTS CONTENTS PAGE Module Introduction i Unit 1 The burden, distribution and pattern of ill-health in the world 1 Session 1 Burden of disease in Africa and the world 3 Session 2 Distribution of ill-health in the world and in developing countries 13 Session 3 Patterns of ill-health in developed, developing and underdeveloped countries 29 Session 4 Situational analysis 43 Unit 2 The causes of ill-health in the world: The political, social and economic context of health and disease 59 Session 1 Causes of ill-health and their classification 61 Session 2 The social determinants of health 75 Session 3 Social equality, equity and health status 97 Unit 3 Introduction to health, development and Primary Health Care 117 Session 1 The impact of colonialism, capitalism and underdevelopment on health care 119 Session 2 The declaration of Alma Ata and the health care approach 133
World Health Organization (2007). Community health workers: What do we know about them? Policy Brief. WHO: Geneva. World Health Organization (1998). Decentralization and Health Systems Change in Africa: Case study Summaries. Prepared for the Regional Meeting on Decentralization in the Context of Health Sector Reform in . Geneva: WHO: 1-5 & 57-61.
STATEMENT OF PERSONS NOMINATED AND NOTICE OF POLL Havant Election of a Borough Councillor The following is a statement of the persons nominated for election as a Borough Councillor for Hayling East Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) Name of Proposer Reason why no longer nominated* COATES Richard 17 Brights Lane, Hayling Island, PO11 0JX UK Independence Party (UKIP) Clark David A MARTIN Annie 122 Rowan Road, Havant, Hampshire, PO9 2UU Liberal Democrat Wheeler Malcolm P SATCHWELL Clare Elizabeth 90 Rails Lane, Hayling Island, Hants, PO11 9LP The Conservative Party Candidate Wallage Hayley T UNDERWOOD Susan Mary The Orchard, Copse Lane, Hayling Island, Hants, PO11 0QB Labour Party John B VALENTINE Paul 23 Tournerbury Lane, Hayling Island, PO11 9DJ The Green Party Bream Christopher *Decision of the Returning Officer that the nomination is invalid or other reason why a person nominated no longer stands nominated. The persons above against whose name no entry is made in the last column have been and stand validly nominated. A POLL WILL BE TAKEN on Thursday 7 May 2015 between the hours of 7:00 am and 10:00 pm. Where contested this poll is taken together with the election of a Member of Parliament for the Havant Constituency
STATEMENT OF PERSONS NOMINATED AND NOTICE OF POLL Havant Election of a Borough Councillor The following is a statement of the persons nominated for election as a Borough Councillor for Stakes Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) Name of Proposer Reason why no longer nominated* BAZLEY Ann 11 Campion Close, Waterlooville, Hampshire, PO7 8PE Liberal Democrat Bazley Craig W MARTIN Lewis Murray 46 Juniper Square, Havant, PO9 1JA The Green Party Smith Wendy A NEWNHAM Carole 87 Cunningham Road, Waterlooville, PO7 5TZ UK Independence Party (UKIP) Tuffs June V PATRICK Diana 1 Waterloo Close, Cowplain, Waterlooville, Hants, PO8 8QJ The Conservative Party Candidate Heard Rory J S PEARSON Philip 51 Ibsley Grove, Bedhampton, Hants, PO9 3DP Labour Party Berry Anthony *Decision of the Returning Officer that the nomination is invalid or other reason why a person nominated no longer stands nominated. The persons above against whose name no entry is made in the last column have been and stand validly nominated. A POLL WILL BE TAKEN on Thursday 7 May 2015 between the hours of 7:00 am and 10:00 pm. Where contested this poll is taken together with the election of a Member of Parliament for the Havant Constituency
STATEMENT OF PERSONS NOMINATED Election of a Parish Councillor The following is a statement of the persons nominated for election as a Parish Councillor for Theale Date of Election 3 May 2018 Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) Name of Proposer (*), Seconder (**) and Assentors Reason why no longer nominated* ROLFE Clint 1A Crown Lane,, Theale, Reading, Berkshire, RG7 5BG Cox Sharon * Paul Melanie A ** WRIGHT Cleone Joan 111 Meadow Way, Theale, Reading, Berks, RG7 5DE Button Andrew R * Wright Robert J ** The persons above, where no entry is made in the last column, have been and stand validly nominated.