B - List of evaluations completed in the reporting period Investment number and name (if applicable) Name of evaluation Date completed Date Evaluation report Uploaded into AidWorks Date Management response uploaded into AidWorks Published on website INH405 Law and Justice Sector Program INJ405 Samoa School Fees Grant Scheme ING471 ESPII Implementation INH720 Samoa Health Initiative Law and Justice Independent Evaluation End of Program Evaluation Samoa (Primary) School Fees Grant Scheme ADB Completion Report: Samoa: Education Sector Project II June 2016 Final SWAp Evaluation led by the World Bank 5 April 2016 22 January 2016 17 July 2015 17 March 2016 29 April 2016 22 March 2016 14 March 2016 24 2016 29 April 2016 July 2016 July 2016 June 2016 (by Asian Development Bank) September 2016 (by Bank) List of program prioritised evaluations planned for the next 12 months Evaluation title Investment number and name (if applicable) Date – planned commencement (month/year) Date – planned completion (month/year) Purpose of evaluation Evaluation type Post Cyclone Evan Recovery Program Evaluation Samoa Inclusive Education Demonstration Program Final Evaluation Mid-term Review of the Samoa Disability Program National Adaptation Program of Action IV Evaluation INK887 Post TC Evan Recovery Program INI456-Samoa Inclusive Education Demonstration Program INK859-Samoa Disability Program INJ900 Climate Change Adaptation Initiative September 2016 August 2016 November 2016 July 2016 November 2016 December 2016 May 2016 August 2016 - demonstrate results - verify performance - examine value for money -demonstrate results -improve existing investment -analyse lessons learned -demonstrate results -inform new design - End of Investment evaluation Joint evaluation with New Zealand Aid Program DFAT led DFAT led DFAT led
C - AQC ratings AQC investment performance over the previous 12 months and where available last year’s AQC ratings. Investment name Approved budget and duration year on year Relevance Effectiveness Efficiency Monitoring and Evaluation Sustainability Gender equality Risks and Safeguards Samoa Economic Infrastructure $20,000,000 2012-17 2016 AQC 5 4 4 3 4 3 4 2015 AQC 6 5 5 4 5 3 4 Samoa Parliament Complex Redevelopment $12,943,26.61 2012-17 2016 AQC 5 5 4 4 5 4 5 2015 AQC 5 5 4 5 5 4 5 Samoa Health Sector Initiative $18,862,865.27 2007-17 2016 AQC 4 3 3 4 5 4 5 2015 AQC 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 ADB Samoa Power Sector Expansion Program $15,118,099.51 2007-16 2016 AQC 5 5 5 4 5 4 5 2015 AQC 5 5 5 5 6 4 5 Samoa Disability Program $6,481,847.57 2012-18 2016 AQC 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 2015 AQC 5 4 3 4 4 4 4 Health Program $9,200,000.04 (2013-22) 2016 AQC 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 2015 AQC 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 Samoa Education Sector Program $2,363,235.60 (2011-19) 2016 AQC 5 4 4 4 4 4 5 2015 AQC 6 4 4 5 5 4 5 Inclusive Education Demonstration Program $6,101,730.16 (2009-18) 2016 AQC 5 4 3 2 3 4 3 2015 AQC 5 4 4 2 3 4 3 Samoa Cyclone Evan Response & Recovery Program $8,116,513.909 (2012-16) 2016 AQC 5 4 4 3 4 4 4 2015 AQC 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 Samoa Climate Change Adaption $1,937,710.08 (2011-16) 2016 AQC 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 2015 AQC 5 4 4 4 5 3 4 Samoa Economic Reform Program $5,500,000 (2013-2017) 2016 AQC 5 5 5 4 5 3 4 FAQC ratings (include if relevant) Final AQCs assess performance over the lifetime of the investment (ratings are not compared to previous years).
Investment name Approved budget and duration Overall rating Relevance Effectiveness Efficiency Monitoring and Evaluation Sustainability Gender equality Risks and Safeguards Samoa Post-Tsunami Recovery & Reconstruction $6.1m 2009-2015 4 5 5 5 4 5 3 4 Samoa School Fees Grant Scheme $3.5m 2011-2015 4 5 4 4 4 4 3 4 Samoa ESPII Implementation $10.4m 2006-2015 4 5 3 3 3 4 4 4 Australian Development Scholarships-Apia $4.4m 2010-2016 5 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 Samoa Governance and Economic Stability $21.1m 2010-2017 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 Law and Justice Sector Program $4.9m 2007-2016 4 5 3 4 3 4 3 4 Civil Society Support Program Phase II $7.5m 2010-2016 4 5 4 3 4 3 4 4 Definitions of rating scale: Satisfactory (4, 5 and 6) 6 = Very good; satisfies criteria in all areas. 5 = Good; satisfies criteria in almost all areas. 4 = Adequate; on balance, satisfies criteria; does not fail in any major area. Less than satisfactory (1, 2 and 3) 3 = Less than adequate; on balance does not satisfy criteria and/or in at least one major area. 2 = Poor; does not satisfy criteria in major areas. 1 = Very poor; does not satisfy criteria in many major area.