Math and approved earlier ENGT Program Map Unanimous Vote Hist Modifications Unanimous Vote Correct Contemporary Wld hist to Contemporary World History Eng 316 Unanimous Vote UHCC Policy subcommittee – Elaine Yamashita – no report III. Committee Reports Curriculum – Tim (see p 4-13) SPC - Elaine & Laura Budget Process & Timeline - Refugio IV. Student Success Initiatives Student Success – Faculty Participation V. Discussion Items Ebola preparedness - Denise AtP Digital – Dan MoA on tenure and promotion- Senates & UHPA – see pp. 14-16 VI. Old Business Status of Committees – Distance to standing, Sustainable to ad hoc, Strategic Planning – to P&P, Academic Renewal Space Allocations on Campus – Div Chairs update VII. Announcements Student Government – Faculty Sponsor Children for 12/11 Christmas Party - Cynthia VIII. Next Meeting – December 12, 2014 1:30-3:00 Kaaike 105 ACADEMIC SENATE MEETING Friday, Oct 10, 2014 Ka’a’ike 105 3:00-4:30 PM Minutes
Revised: The grid ratings are as follows: 3 = Major skill development and evaluation: Course work develops the skill or ability described in the outcome statement. Demonstration of proficiency factors significantly in the course grade. = Moderate skill development and evaluation: Course work develops the skill or ability described in the outcome statement and it is evaluated, but demonstration of proficiency does not factor significantly in the course grade. 1 = Minor skill development: Course work develops this skill or ability, but it is not evaluated. = No significant skill development: Course work does not develop this skill or ability. Old: The CASLO grid ratings are as follows: 3 = Major Emphasis: The student is actively involved (uses, reinforces, applies, and evaluated) in the student learning outcomes. The learner outcome is the focus of the class 2 = Moderate Emphasis: The student uses, reinforces, applies and is evaluated by this learner outcome, but it is not the focus of the class 1 = Emphasis: The student is provided an opportunity to use, reinforce, and apply this learner outcome, but does not get evaluated on this learner outcome 0 = No Emphasis: The student does not address this learner outcome MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT REGARDING THE ROLES OF THE UH PROFESSIONAL ASSEMBLY AND THE UH FACULTY SENATES October 17th, 2014 October 31, 2014 Preamble: The purpose of this document is to outline the roles of the University of Hawaiʻi Professional Assembly and the University of Hawaiʻi Faculty Senates. 1. General Statement Guiding UHPA-Faculty Senate Relations Members of the faculty should keep in mind that the UHPA and the faculty senates are agencies of the faculty that cooperate to provide the best ways to achieve the generally recognized professional and personal objectives of each member of the faculty. As can be seen from the statements of jurisdiction, UHPA is the agency through which members of the faculty can assure themselves of proper conditions of employment. The faculty senate is the organization through which the members of the faculty can develop educational programs of the highest quality possible and those aspects of their professional activities not covered by either the various aspects of the collective bargaining contract between UHPA and the University, or of the appropriate statutes. 2. Tenure and Promotion Process Except as specified below, procedural matters involving tenure and promotions are to be handled by UHPA. Changes in the form or format of the tenure and promotion mechanism are the responsibility of UHPA.