support the line of argument. LEVEL 7 Question has been fully answered. Content selection fully relevant to line of argument. 47–50 43–46 LEVEL 6 Question has been answered. Content selection relevant to a line of argument. 43–46 40–42 38–39 LEVEL 5 Question answered to a great extent. Content adequately covered and relevant. 38–39 36–37 34–35 30–33 28–29 LEVEL 4 Question recognisable in answer. Some omissions or irrelevant content selection. 30–33 28–29 26–27 LEVEL 3 Content selection does relate to the question, but does not answer it, or does not always relate to the question. Omissions in coverage. 26–27 24–25 20–23 LEVEL 2 Question inadequately addressed. Sparse content. 20–23 18–19 14–17 LEVEL 1 Question inadequately addressed or not at all. Inadequate or irrelevant content. 14–17 0–13 QUESTION 1: HOW DID THE CONSTRUCTON OF THE BERLIN WALL BY THE GERMAN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLI INTENSIFY COLD WAR TENSIONS IN THE 1960’s? 1.1 1.1.1 [Extraction of evidence from Source 1A – L1] 2.7 million people (1 x 1) (1) 1.1.2 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1A – L2] Most of the East Berliners did not want to live under a communist government
• The USA failed to win the hearts and minds of the Vietnamese people – many Vietnamese people saw the communist forces as liberators and nationalists • In 1975 North Vietnam troops captured the South Vietnamese capital of Saigon. The country was united under communist rule. The USA had failed to prevent the spread of communism • The role of the media and the anti-war movement in the United States of America • Any other relevant response • Conclusion: Candidates should up their argument with a relevant conclusion [50] QUESTION 5: INDEPENDENT AFRICA: COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIES– THE AND TANZANIA [Planned and constructed an argument based on evidence using analytical and interpretative skills] SYNOPSIS Candidates should undertake a comparative discussion on the political successes and challenges facing the Congo and Tanzania. MAIN ASPECTS Candidates should include the following aspects in response:
ELABORATION: • Brief explanation of the Black Power principles (black people should be should control politics and politicians in their communities, defend themselves and fight back if necessary, develop and emphasize pride in their own culture • 1964 Civil Rights Act passed: 1965 Voting Rights Act passed • Despite legal reforms and ‘victory’ for Civil Rights Movement, a new militancy emerged among many African-Americans, because they were frustrated with the slow pace of real change • Civil Rights activists experienced on-going violence in southern states from segregationists • Violence experienced by young African-American men in particular at the hands of police • Lack of jobs, poverty and inadequate provision of social services for youth led to use of violence against the state • Rebellions/riots erupted in northern ‘ghettos’ between 1965 –1969, often triggered by police brutality Black Panther Party for Self Defence • Wanted to advance people economically, socially and politically • Established neighbourhood patrols to protect communities from white police harassment • Operated survival programmes (services to the poor, free medical clinics economic and political classes) Malcolm X • Opposed Civil Rights multi-racial approach • Awakened Black consciousness • Promoted racial separation Stokely Carmichael • Coined the term ‘Black Power’ • Against non-violence • Encouraged self-determination and black identity