Exemplary Acceptable Developing Comments Accurate □ Refers to current/accurate University & Division learning outcomes □ Refers to some outdated or inaccurate University & Division outcomes □ Refers to University & Division learning outcomes that are inaccurate (or missing) III. Signature Program/Service Overview Exemplary Acceptable Developing Comments Purpose □ Clearly states the purpose or intent in terms of who, what, and why □ States a purpose, but is somewhat vague or over-simplified □ Missing or unclear purpose Goals □ Clearly states goals for the program/service □ Goals for the program/service are vague □ for the program/service are missing or unclear Explicit □ Provides detailed information on the time, place, scope of the program/service that an uninformed reader can easily understand □ Provides minimal/sufficient detail that allows an uninformed reader to understand □ Little or no detailed information about the program/service itself which leave the uninformed reader completely lost Clarity □ Clear, concise, succinct and understandable □ Is clear but verbose □ Unclear Enduring/Importance □ Conveys the importance of the program/service and explains why it is considered a “signature” and essential component of the functional area □ Importance is implied, or relies on the reviewer’s previous knowledge of the program/service; program/service is an ancillary component of the functional area □ Makes no claims that set this program/service apart from others originating in the functional area; program/service is a non-essential component of the functional area IV. Methods and Procedures Exemplary Acceptable Developing Comments
Description of Participants □ Identifies how the participants/samples were obtained; reports sample size, response rate, and describes the sample/participants by providing demographic information □ Missing 1-2 components from participants/sample description, but able to provide an acceptable amount of information about the participants/sample □ The participant/sample description does not succeed in presenting an accurate picture of the participants/sample Data Collection Timeframe □ Provides detailed information timing and duration □ Provides incomplete information □ The report does not include this information Data Collection Methods □ Provides detailed information the assessment tools and methods used □ Provides broad or vague information about the assessment tools and methods used □ Reports little or no information about the assessment tools and methods used Limitations □ Author clearly describes both the limitations stemming from the methodology, as well as critiques the limitations of the program/service □ Author partially describes both the limitations stemming from the methodology, as well as attempts to critique the limitations of the program/service □ Author does not address limits inherent in the methodology nor critiques the limitations of the program/service V. Results and Conclusions/Actions Taken/Closing the Loop Exemplary Acceptable Developing Comments Results relate to SLO □ Data analyses measures success in terms of the SLOs □ Results provide information, but evaluation of success is not explicit □ The results do not correspond or align with the measurement of SLOs Presentation / Clarity □ Results are professional, easy to read, and include appropriate charts/graphs □ Results format is inconsistent or distracting □ Results are difficult to read/understand Objective □ Results are direct and provide information that is useful □ Results are skewed or do not present a complete picture □ Results are missing or misrepresented Actionable □ Report makes insightful connections between results and future steps □ Future steps fail to address or are not related to results □ Recommendations are not based on the assessment or are missing