well as the Early Detection and Intervention for the Prevention of Psychosis Program (EDIPP) by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Applicants should be familiar with this work and lessons learned, including the importance of outreach to secondary mental health services and other community referral partners such as schools, pediatricians. For more information, visit the following links: The CHR-P program is authorized Part E of Title V Section 561 (290-ff) of the Public Health Service Act (as amended), commonly known as the Children’s Mental Health Initiative (CMHI). CMHI supports the development of comprehensive, community-based services that use a systems of care approach for children and youth with serious emotional disturbance (SED). The statutory requirements for CMHI also apply to CHR-P, including eligible applicants and match requirements. The CHR-P program is also authorized by Section 10001 of the 21st Century Cures Act (P.L.114-255). This announcement also addresses Healthy People 2020 Mental Health and Mental Disorders Topic Area HP 2020-MHMD. 2. EXPECTATIONS CHR-P is a SAMHSA services grant program. The CHR-P program is designed to provide state-of-the-science services in real-world community settings. It is expected that the CHR-P program services will (1) be delivered with cultural and linguistic competence and address issues of diversity and disparity; and (2) include consideration of family and youth input to program activities. SAMHSA intends that its services programs result in the delivery of services as soon as possible award. Recipients will be expected to implement a stepped-care model. Under a separate announcement, NIMH encourages partnerships between service grant applicants and mental health researchers to evaluate the effectiveness of stepped-care intervention strategies for youth and young adults at clinical high risk for psychosis. Research studies conducted within the context of the CHR-P program should be proposed through separate NIH research project grant applications. It is anticipated that implementation of the stepped-care model will begin within 6 months after award and that full implementation will occur not later than one year after award. Full implementation of the stepped-care approach will follow a period of hiring, outreach and engagement, protocol development, provider training, and delivering
Examples: Non-SMART Objective Critique SMART Objective Teachers will be trained on the selected evidence-based substance abuse prevention curriculum. The objective is not SMART because it is not specific, measurable, or time-bound. It can be made SMART by specifically indicating who is responsible for training the teachers, how many will be trained, who they are, and by when the trainings will be conducted. By June 1, 2018, LEA supervisory will have trained 75% of health education teachers in the local school district on the selected, evidence-based substance abuse prevention curriculum. 90% of youth will participate in classes on assertive communication skills. This objective is not SMART because it is not specific or It can be made SMART by indicating who will conduct the activity, by when, and who will participate in the lessons on assertive communication skills. By the end of the 2018 school year, district health educators will have conducted classes on assertive communication skills for 90% of youth in the middle school receiving the substance abuse and HIV prevention curriculum. Train individuals in the community on the prevention of prescription drug/opioid overdose-related deaths. This objective is not SMART as it is not specific, measurable or It can be made SMART by specifically indicating who is responsible for the training, how many people will be trained, who they are, and by when the training will be conducted. By the end of year two of the project, the Health Department will have trained 75% of EMS staff in the County Government on the selected curriculum addressing the prevention of prescription drug/opioid deaths.
If the position is not being charged to the Federal award, identify the cost as $0. The key staff positions identified in must be included in the Personnel section and/or the Contractual Section (F). In addition, the Project Director must be the same as the Project Director listed on the HHS Checklist. FEDERAL REQUEST – Sample Personnel Narrative Position (1) Name (2) Key Staff (3) Annual Salary/Rate (4) Level of Effort (5) Salary Charge to Award (6) (1) Project Director Alice Doe Yes $64,890 10% $6,489 (2) Program Coordinator Vacant, to be hired within 60 days of anticipated award date No $46,276 100% $46,276 (3) Clinical Director Jane Doe No In-kind cost 20% 0 FEDERAL REQUEST in Section B column 1, line 6a of SF-424A) $52,765 FEDERAL REQUEST – Sample Justification for Personnel The Project Director will provide daily oversight of the grant. This position is responsible for overseeing the implementation of the project activities, internal and external coordination, developing materials, and conducting meetings. The Program Coordinator will coordinate project service and activities, including training, communication and information dissemination. NON-FEDERAL MATCH – Sample Personnel Narrative Position (1) Name (2) Key Staff (3) Annual Salary/Rate (4) Level of Effort (5) Total Salary Charge to Award (6) (1) Project Director Alice Doe Yes $64,890 7% $4,542 (2) Prevention Specialist Sarah Smith No $26,000 25% $6,500
5. Totals $184,303 $64,087 $248,390 Standard Form 424A SECTION B – BUDGET CATEGORIES 6. Object Class Categories GRANT PROGRAM FUNCTION OR ACTIVITY Total (5) (1) Title of FOA (2) (3) (4) a. Personnel $52,765 $21,580 $74,345 b. Fringe Benefits $15,644 $6,399 $22,043 c. Travel $2,444 $1,237 $3,681 d. Equipment $0 $0 $0 e. Supplies $3,796 $1,773 $5,569 f. Contractual $86,998 $26,051 $113,049 g. Construction $0 $0 $0 h. Other $15,815 $4,250 $20,650 i. Total Direct Charges (sum 6a-6h) $177,462 $61,290 $238,752 j. Indirect Charges $6,841 $2,797 $9,638 k. TOTALS (sum of 6i and 6j) $184,303 $64,087 $248,390
7. Program Income Standard Form 424A SECTION C – NON-FEDERAL RESOURCES (a) Grant Program (b) Applicant (c) State (d) Other Sources (e) TOTALS 8. Title of FOA $64,087 $64,087 9. 10. 11. 12. TOTAL (sum of lines 8-11) $ $ $64,087 $64,087 SECTION D – FORECASTED CASH 13. Federal Totals for 1st Year $184,303 1st Quarter $46,075 2nd Quarter $46,076 3rd Quarter $46.076 4th Quarter $46,076 14. Non-Federal $ 64,087 $16,021 $16,022 $16,022 $16,022 15.TOTAL (sum of lines 13 and 14) $248,390 $62,096 $62,098 $62,098 $62,098 SECTION E – BUDGET ESTIMATES OF FEDERAL FUNDS NEEDED FOR BALANCE OF THE PROJECT (a) Grant Program FUTURE FUNDING PERIODS (a) First (b) Second (c) Third (d) Fourth 16. of FOA $184,498 $185,531 $185,762 $186,001 17. 18.
19. 20. TOTAL (Sum of lines 16-19) $184,194 $185,531 $184,458 $184,932 SECTION F – OTHER BUDGET INFORMATION 21. Direct Charges: 22. Indirect Charges: 23. Remarks: