62: Ethnic group Estimated number of affected persons Settlement pattern Bunu Communities (Indigene ethnic group, of Okun ethnicity) 4,800 living within the proposed farm area 2,000 living outside the proposed farm area but cultivating fields within the proposed farm area Large square, tin roofed huts Large, nucleated and accessible settlements along main roads and secondary roads. (Ape, Aiyede, Ighun, Tata, Ibori, Eshe, OkeBukun, Ayegunle, Ode Ape, Agbadu, Apaa,Agbede) Tiv communities (settler farmers from Benue State who arrived in the last 8 to 20 years) 1,440 living within the proposed farm area. Small, scattered homesteads. Circular, thatched huts arranged in a circular pattern often around a central communal hut. Tiv settlements are clustered in the centre of the farm area Fulani settlements (semi settled farmer-pastoralist arriving from northern Nigeria over the past 2 generations) 850 living within the proposed farm area. 200 living just outside the farm area and cultivating or grazing within the farm area. Groups of circular thatched huts arranged in a linear pattern. Cluster of settlements in southern part of proposed farm and along the eastern boundary. Igbira settlements (settlers from Okene area of Kogi state) 410 living within the proposed farm area. Clusters of square, usually tin roofed huts. Small settlements of up to 50 people. farmers (settler farmers) Not estimated Individual families living amongst Bunu communities Nomadic Fulani (Bororo) Not estimated, no fixed dwellings, Migration through the project area. Source: PEIA fieldwork 2014 - Analysis of 2012 satellite imagery, GIS analysis. The most striking feature of the settlement pattern in the project is the distinction between the indigene (Bunu) community and the various settler groups (Tiv, Fulani, Igbira, The Bunu regard themselves as the traditional owners of the land, and are governed by strong systems of traditional authority. Six Bunu clans inhabit the project area: (1) the Alape group centred on the villages of Ape, Ode Ape and Agbadu,
71: INDICATIVE Type of Impact Affected Person/unit Eligibility Criteria Financial or In-Kind Compensation Allowances/Assistance Land(including fallow land used as part of agricultural cycle) Cultural Heritage Permanent acquisition of land Land owner (individual, clan or community) Tenant/User (will not receive compensation for land but forimprovements to land they have made such as crops, houses, sheds etc. (see below for details) Person with formal right to land or without formal legal right to land but have recognizable claim to land recognized under the prevailing local land tenure Replacement with land of equal size and quality in locations adjudged as same in value to the acquired one. If land replacement is not possible or available then cash compensation at full replacement value as well as disturbance allowance of 10% Community land – replacement land or if unavailable, compensation to be paid to the community with full consultation and participation Land Transfer allowance 10 % of market value in cash Covering all administrative fees related to the purchase or provision of replacement land. Moving allowance Temporary acquisition of land Full restoration to pre-project conditions; Financial compensation for any crops or trees acquired or destroyed; compensation for any rent received from land; replacement land if lack of access will last for an agricultural cycle and prevent farmers from either planting or harvesting crops. Return of land to land user after use Moving allowance Permanent /Temporary loss of cultural heritage including sacred sites. Community Community Land not dispute Replacement in consultation with concerned parties including ministry of environment with respect to forest/trees Cash compensation of temporary loss of income Restriction /loss of grazing ground Fulani herdsmen and others Established grazing pattern/history Assistance to create grazing reserve elsewhere in consultation with PAPs Cash compensation for temporary loss of income.
• Number of grievances by severity; average number of days for resolution. • Amounts of compensation paid per category (structures, land, crops, others). • Inflation rates (via monthly market survey). • Stakeholder engagement activities designed to ensure that the population is consulted. Repeat socio-economic surveys are undertaken three years and five years after the land acquisition, or any such time as determined by the external auditor to provide data for external monitoring and the completion audit. These surveys capture socio-economic quality of life indicators (see below) and livelihood restoration indicators. Questionnaires used in replicate surveys are consistent with those used to describe the baseline situation during the elaboration of the investment specific RAP to allow for comparisons. Repeat Survey Indicators are: • Income and income streams. • Assessment of household expenditures. • Changes in the cost of living and/or income and expenditures patterns. • Surface area of land holdings. • Crops and estimated or observed yields. • The extent that perennial crops have been replanted. • Livestock numbers (by species), equipment and other assets. • Number of unemployed people in the households. • Number of children attending school. • Health of the household. • Extent to which social networks and status have been re-established. • PAP degree of satisfaction with compensation and resettlement process. • Attitude survey of host community. At a minimum the baseline studies and monitoring shall include the following indicators: Category Impacts Monitoring indicators Land Land owners losing permanent land Tenants losing land Squatters losing land for agriculture Disputes over land compensation Proportion of PAPs with registered land title % of land owners that received land for land compensation No. of landless PAPs in the ABIR No of grievances received on account of land acquisition No of people economically due to land take Improvements on Land Residential building Business building Economic trees No. and % of PAPs received compensation for economic trees No. and % of PAPs that received moving assistance No. of complaints from compensation or omission Change in the standard of housing and living condition % of PAPs that received compensation to displacement Livelihood Loss of farm/agricultural crops Loss of pastoral ground and income Loss of ground for hunting, fishing, logging and artisanal mining Loss of employment % of PAPs that are Contract Farmers % of PAPs that changed livelihoods % of PAPs in new livelihoods that have improved living condition % of PAPs that received disturbance allowance