Table of Contents 2 4 7 8 16 17 19 20 MOSAP II 20 22 23 23 23 24 24 ESMF 32 32 33 34 34 EIA/ESMP 35 MOSAP II 36 36 37 38 38 38 1. 39 2. 39 39 2.2. 40 2.3 40 2.4 41 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION DESCRIPTION THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK IMPACTS THE MITIGATION RESPONSIBILITIES INSTITUTIONAL IMPLEMENTATION SOCIAL ENVIRONMENTAL
to be direct project beneficiaries. The project beneficiaries thus account for 40% of all the rural households in the three provinces and for nearly 10% of all rural households in Angola. Table 1. Population Data of the Project Area Provincie Municipality Commune Population of Communes Bie 1 Andulo Sede 108,104 2 Cassumbe 16,301 3 Caluncinga 74,148 4 Chivaulo 36,238 5 Catabola Sede 56,079 6 Sande 15,167 7 Caiuera 13,403 8 Chiuca 13,157 9 Chipeta 20,479 10 Chinguar Sede 36,353 11 Cangote 33,762 12 Cutato 47,355 13 Camacupa Sede 68,850 14 Ringoma 14,505 15 Umpulo 9,875 16 Muinha 17,876 17 Kuanza 30,654 18 Kuito Kunje 127,088 19 Chicala 8.69 20 Cambandula 45,125 21 Trumba 8,150 22 Nhareia Sede 47,805 23 Gamba 7,873 24 Cayeye 18,390 25 Chitembo Sede 33,318 26 Cachingues 11,929 27 Mumbue 13,456 28 Mutumbo 5,493 Sub-total of potential target beneficiaries of Bie 7 28 930,942 Total 9 1,338,923 Huambo 29 Bailundo 21,470 30 Hengue 39,200 31 Luvemba 40,692 32 Comuna Sede Bailundo 121,570 33 Lunge 59,218
34 Londuimbali Comuna Sede Londuimbali 33,776 35 Cumbila 14,653 36 Galanga 32,525 37 Alto Hama 28,810 38 Ussoque 14,684 39 Mungo Comuna Sede Mungo 69,838 40 Cambuengo 40,291 41 Cachiungo Comuna Sede Catchiungo 52,928 42 Chiumbo 23,587 43 Chinhama 39,148 44 Chicala Cholohanga Comuna sede Chicala Cholohanga 36,690 45 26,497 46 Samboto 20,382 47 Huambo Chipipa 37,372 48 Calima 75,473 49 Caála Comuna sede 132,479 50 Calenga 37,120 51 Cuima 58,123 52 Catata 31,761 53 Ekunha Comuna Sede Ecunha 53,617 54 Tchipeio 25,231 Sub-total of potencial target beneficiaries (Haumbo) 8 27 1,167,135 Total (Huambo) 11 1,896,147 Malanje 55 Cacuso Cacuso 27,738 56 Lombe 13,683 57 Quizenga 10,120 58 Soqueco 8,000 59 Kalandula Kuale 14,257 60 Kota 18,621 61 Kalandula 23,310 62 Cateco Kangola 9,899 63 Quale 14,257 64 Kinge 7,486 65 Caculana Caculama 17,700 66 Caxinga 6,250 67 Muquixe 5,087 68 kiwaba-Nzoji Mufuma 5,100 69 Kiwaba-Nzoji 9,303 70 Malanje Cambaxe 2,164 71 N'gola-Luije 6,990
use of the appropriate tools, such as the screening form, ESMP, EIA and related relevant subjects. 2-day refreshement courses should also be held as needed during the course of the programme lifecycle. A provisional program for a 5-day workshop is proposed in Table 1. Table 1– Provisional program for a 5-day workshop Subject Target Group Method and Social Awareness and Social Impact Assessment Methods and Process Regulations, Acts & Legislation Senior level officers involved in planning. All Staff at irrigation schemes sites and EC Workshops and Lectures and Social Management Plan Mitigation and Measures Monitoring & Evaluation Social Management Budget Water Management Related authorities All Field Engineers EC Workshops and Lectures and Socially Sound Construction Practice Clean Construction Technology Waste and Management Storage and maintenance of equipment Control on Soil Erosion and Plantation Construction Camp Management Safety Practices All Field Engineers Water Management Related authorities Authority EC Workshops and Lectures
It is estimated that the implementation of the ESMF including the required provisions, training and capacity building will cost approximately $650,000 USD. The costs of preparing and implementing the safeguards aspects of the project are estimates as the size, type and location of the subprojects are not fully determined at this stage. The costs outlined below may vary depending on when and how the ESMF implementation takes place; therefore it can be expected that the proposed ESMF budget may increase or decrease depending on the work plan agreed upon. The related with capacity building, training, preparation, implementation and monitoring of the environmental and social safeguards are integrated within the overall project budget. Table 3- Budget Estimate for the Implementation of the ESMF Recommendation Responsible authority Schedule Estimated cost Environmental safeguard specialist Social safeguard specialist Environmental and social safeguard focal points (3) PIU 2016 – 2020 Annually $60,000 $60,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 Preparation, implementation and monitoring of EIAs, ESMPs and related safeguard management plans PIU with TA 2016 - 2020 $350,000 5 days training program on general understanding of environmental management and its applications PIU in cooperation with MINAGI with TA 2016 $25,000 1-day training for contractors and supervision consultants. 2-day Refresher trainings on ESMF implementation and other topics such as EIAs, Environmental Information Systems/Water Catchment Planning, Community Planning, and Water EC/MoNRE with TA 2016 – 2020 Annually $45,000
e Has there been litigation or complaints of any environmental nature directed against the proponent or sub-project to application and/or relevant environmental authority for this information. Identify type of activities and likely environmental impacts: Yes/No answers and bullet lists preferred except where detail is essential. What are the likely environmental impacts, opportunities, risks and liabilities associated with the subproject? Refer to ESMF– Impact Mitigation, Disclosure and Monitoring Guidelines Determine environmental screening category: Yes/No answers and bullet lists preferred except where detail is essential. After compiling the above, determine which category the subproject falls under based on the environmental categories established by WB and National Environment authorities Refer to ESMF–Screening and Review Process
Environmental category: ________________________________ Requires an ESIA to be submitted on date:. Requires a RAP to be submitted on date:. Requires an ESMP to be submitted on date:. Requires preparation of additional plans (e.g. Pest Management Plan or Dam Safety Plan) Does not require further environmental or social studies Application of simple mitigation measures by qualified staff will suffice (check-list) Reviewer: Name: Signature: Date: Annex II – Proposed structure of the ESIA reports Executive Summary Introduction Project description Environmental and Social Baseline Expected Impacts and Mitigation/Enhancement Environmental Management Plan and Monitoring Section 1 – Introduction Section 2 - Methodology Section 3 – Legal and Policy Framework Section 4 - Project description Section 5 – Analysis of Project Alternatives Section 6 – Biophysical and Social Environment Section 7 – Potential Impacts Section 8 – Mitigation and enhancement Measures Section 9 – Environmental Management Plan Section 10 – Monitoring Plan Section 11 – Conclusions 1 – Environmental Management Matrix (environmental and monitoring plans) 2 – Public Consultation Annex 3 – References Annex 4 – Maps, Graphs and Pictures 5 – ESIA team Composition
solid and liquid waste Soil and water pollution from chemicals & fertilizers proper storage of materials, awareness campaigns Dust, Emissions, Strong Light, Noise and Vibration Controlled operation use of appropriate equipment, proper orientation of lights, use of alternative materials, use water sprinklers to control dust, use of scrubbers Contractors Project Coordination Number of complaints Extent of property and vegetation soiling Monthly Water-borne and / or water related diseases Provision of potable water supplies and sanitation facilities, capacity building in sanitation and health issues, awareness campaigns Contractors, Project Coordination, Local Agriculture Officer, NGOs Increase in related ailments Bi-annually Loss of natural and cultural heritage. Conduct feasibility studies, fencing, introduce proper antiquity education programmes Project Coordination, Agric. Officer, NGOs Contractors Project Coordination Number or size of property lost Before project implementation During project implementation Conflict and/or loss of habitats, animals and aquatic life. Minimize vibrations and strong enforcement of parks and wildlife law, conduct feasibility studies, avoid contamination of soil and water Contractors Project Coordination, Local Agric. Officer NGOs Animal count Fish and aquatic life estimates Before project implementation Annually during project implementation Disturbance of marginal areas Avoid extraction of raw materials from marginal areas, no construction of structures in marginal areas. Project Coordination NGOs Size of area affected Bi-annually Incidence of flooding Forestation of the catchment of the irrigation schemes Forestry Department Project Coordination, NGO’s, Number of trees planted Area planted with trees Number of people or properties affected by floods Annually Exposure to Encourage organic farming, and the use of Agro-chemicals. Conduct awareness training & workshops Project Coordination Ministry of Agriculture Scheme Management Project Coordination Ministry of Agriculture Scheme Management Number of people affected by agro-chemicals Annually Disruption of footpaths Good irrigation scheme designs Relocation of the footpaths Project Coordination Scheme Management Project Coordination Scheme Management Number of footpaths in use Problems of accessibility During design During construction Salinization Encourage organic farming, the use of agro-chemicals and provide water management training to farmers Project Coordination Ministry of Agriculture Project Coordination Ministry of Agriculture Farm productivity (per hectare) Annually Disputes over water resources Provide water management training to farmers and introduce alternative sources of water such as boreholes. Project Coordination Ministry of Agriculture Project Coordination Ministry of Agriculture availability Crop productivity Number of complaints Water logging Provide water management training to farmers Project Coordination NGO’s Project Coordination NGO’s Prolonged presence of water Poor growth of crops Annually