zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
A third reason mindfulness appears to cultivate empathy and compassion is that it guards against the feelings of stress and busyness that make us focus more on ourselves and less on the needs of other people. This was famously demonstrated in the classic conducted by John Darley and Daniel Batson in the 1970s. Darley and Batson assigned seminary students at Princeton University to deliver a talk on the Good Samaritan. While on their way to their presentation, the students passed someone (working with the researchers) who was slumped over and groaning. The researchers tested all kinds of variables to see what might make the students stop to help, but only one variable mattered: whether or not the students were late for their talk. Only 10 percent of the students stopped to help when they were late; more than six times as many helped when they were not in a hurry. This study suggests that people are not inherently morally insensitive, but when we’re stressed, scared, hurried, it’s easy to lose touch with our deepest values. By helping us stay attuned to what’s happening around us in the present moment, regardless of the time, mindfulness helps us stay connected to what is most important. As the Zen monk teaches, “The most important thing is to remember the most important thing.” For me, the most important thing is to continue to explore, with an open heart and mind, what mindfulness truly is, and help illuminate how it can be of greatest benefit. We clearly do not have all the answers yet; I think what is most interesting is to ask the questions. As Rilke said, “Have patience with everything unresolved in your heart and try to love the questions themselves.” The exploration of mindfulness requires great sensitivity and a range of methodological glasses. Our science—and our lives—will benefit by looking through all of them, illuminating the richness and complexity of mindfulness. Shauna Shapiro, Ph.D., is a professor at Santa Clara University, a clinical psychologist, and internationally recognized expert in mindfulness. She has published over 100 journal articles and book chapters, and co-authored the critically acclaimed book, , as well as . © 2013, Greater Good and Shauna Shapiro source:
The hope of two thousand years, Is not lost: To be a free nation in our land, The land of Zion and Jerusalem (Translation for siddur Sim Shalom) עַיִן לְצִיּוֹן צוֹפִיָּה, עוֹד לֹא אָבְדָה תִּקְוָתֵנוּ, הַתִּקְוָה בַּת שְׁנוֹת אַלְפַּיִם, לִהְיוֹת עַם חָפְשִׁי בְּאַרְצֵנוּ, אֶרֶץ צִיּוֹן וִירוּשָׁלַיִם. Ayin l’tziyon tzofiyah. Od lo avdah tikvatenu Hatikvah sh’not alpayim Lih’yot am chafshi b’artzenu Eretz tziyon vi’rushalayim Israel isn’t just war or Israel is Society • Diversity • Politics • Social action Culture • History • Heritage • Religious and ethnic diversity Innovation • Science and technology • The environment • Medicine (You are encouraged to look into aspects of Israel for programming inspiration!)
__________ (2006). Interim Report I Payment Cards: Sector Inquiry under Article 17 Regulation 1/2003 on retail banking, April 12, 2006. . Finkle, Victoria (2012). “Down, But Not Out: Visa to Claw Back PIN Debit Business.” American Banker. August 10, 2012. GAO. 2012. “Community Banks and Credit Unions, Impact of the Dodd-Frank Act Depends Largely on Future Rule Making.” Report to Congressional Requesters, September 2012. IBISWorld Industry Research Reports. MasterCard. “U.S. Merchant Interchange Lawsuit” . McAndrews, James and Zhu Wang (2012) “The Economics of Two-Sided Payment Card Markets: Pricing, Adoption and Usage,” Working Paper 12-06, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. Mui, Ylan Q. 2011. “Banks convince Fed to raise swipe fee limit,” Washington Post, June 29, 2011. NACS. National Retail Federation, Food Marketing Institute, Miller Oil Co., Boscov’s Department LLC, and National Restaurant Association, versus Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. July 31, 2013. . Nakamura, Emi and Jon Steinsson. 2008. “Five Facts about Prices: A Reevaluation of Menu Cost Models.” Quarterly Journal of Economics. National Association of Theater Owners . Nijs, Vincent, Kanishka Eric T. Anderson, Karsten Hansen, and Lakshman Krishnamurthi. 2009. “Channel Pass-Through of Trade Promotions.” Marketing Science. Reserve Bank of Australia (2008). “Reform of Australia’s Payments System: Preliminary Conclusions of the 2007/08 Review,” April 2008. Rochet, J.C. and J. Tirole (2002) “Cooperation among Competitors: Some Economics of Payment Card Associations,” RAND Journal of Economics, 33: 1-22. Rochet, Jean-Charles and Zhu Wang (2010). “Issuer Competition and the Credit Card Interchange Fee Puzzle.” Working Paper, February, 2010.
SHARE Financials 9.2 Training Reminder Subject: Final SHARE Financials 9.2 Training Reminder Recipients: Agency FIN <AGENCY NAME> FIN Users As you know, SHARE Financials is upgrading to version 9.2 on October 12, 2017. Online training for SHARE Financials 9.2 was made available on September 7th and you have until October 12th to complete your training. Don’t forget to read the before taking any of your online trainings. You can also watch the watch the to learn how to take your mandatory trainings. For more detailed instructions on how to search for and take your required trainings please review the SHARE FIN 9.2 Training Announcement: FIN 9.2 Go-Live is approaching quickly so make sure to complete your training before October 12th. For more information about the SHARE upgrade, visit the . Let me know if you have further questions about training. Best, <NAME> SMARTnet Team Representative
SUBJECT- MATHEMATICS Note: Do all work in Maths Register. Verify the commutative property of addition and subtraction for each of the following pairs of Rational Numbers. i) 9/13 and -4/9 ii) -3/7 and 4/3 Write properties of square, rectangle, parallel gram, rhombus and kite. Write and learn squares and cubes of first 20 whole numbers. Construct the following quadrilaterals: Rhombus BEND, BN=5.6cm, DE=6.5cm Parallelogram HEAR, HE = 5 cm, EA = 6cm and R=85o A parallelogram OKAY where OK = 5.5 cm and KA = 4.2 cm. Is it unique? The number of students in a hostel, speaking different languages is given below. Display the data in a Pie Chart: Language Hindi English Marathi Tamil Bengali Total Number of Students 40 12 9 7 4 72 Solve the following equations and check your results: i) = ii) + = Verify by paper cutting and pasting that the sum of the exterior angles of a polygon, taken in an order is 360o. Solve: HCF of 73, 97, 101 LCM of 60, 80, 240 , , , (arrange ascending order) 999.9 + + 200 + .09 + + Find the perimeter and area of the following: A parallelogram, whose base and height are 14cm and 5 cm respectively. A Square, side is 40 cm. Circle, radius is 14 cm. Equilateral Triangle, sides are 15 cm and height is 7 cm. Revise the following chapters in practice notebook. Ch-1 Rational Numbers Ch-2 Linear Equation in one variable Ch-3 Understanding Quadrilateral (Ex-3.1 & 3.2 only) CLASS VIII
Colorado Separate Worksheets 1.5 Multiplier Colorado uses two worksheets. One for Sole Physical Custody and another for Shared Physical Custody. Worksheet B is to be used after the non-custodial parent has a child for more than 92 overnights per year. o After finding the percentage of time each parent has the child the directions say to: “On Line 4, the basic child support obligation from the child support schedule is entered. This amount is then multiplied by 1.5 to calculate the shared care basic obligation. This amount is entered on Line 5. Each parent’s share of the shared care support obligation based on the parent’s percentage share of total income is calculated on Line 6 by multiplying the income share of each parent from Line 3 times the shared care support obligation from Line 5. The next step is to calculate the support obligation of each parent for the time the child(ren) spends with the other parent. This is done on Line 9 by multiplying the amount from Line 6 by the percentage found in Line 7 for the OTHER parent.” This gives you the “Support Obligation for Time with Other Parent.” o doing this, other adjustments paid by both parents are calculated. o Colorado’s statute does not specifically mention a percentage above 50% but only that you should calculate based upon the percentage. Connecticut Deviation Language Only Section 46b-215a-3. Deviation criteria (B)(6) Special circumstances In some cases, there may be special circumstances not otherwise addressed in this section in which deviation from presumptive support amounts may be warranted for reasons of equity. Such circumstances are limited to the following: (A) Shared physical custody. When a shared physical custody arrangement exists, deviation is warranted only when: (i) such arrangement substantially reduces the custodial parent’s, or substantially increases the noncustodial parent’s expenses for the child; and (ii) sufficient funds remain for the parent receiving support to meet the basic needs of the child after deviation. Nowhere on the chart or in the guidelines does it specifically discuss it aside from above.
Morning Star Baptist 3204 Brothers SE Michael Sharp and Jan Akue: 202-373-5566 St. Thomas More 4275 4th St. SE Mary Bush: 240.619.4251 Frances Davies: 301-686-1480 True Gospel Tabernacle 4201 Wheeler Road SE Pastor Reginald Farmer: 202-388-0213 MARYLAND Box for Satellites in Southern Maryland 1 20607 – Accokeek River Jordan Project Livingston Rd Rev. Tierney Screen: 301-873-8704 Rev. Robert Screen: 240-687-4026 20613 – Brandywine Union Bethel AME 6810 Floral Park Rd Nyanda Dutch Malik: 301-372-1405 for Satellites in Southern Maryland 2 20677 – Port Tobacco Redeeming Life Ministries Intl 7845 Port Tobacco Road Renee Whaley: 301-392-3502 Phyllis Bell: 301-392-3502 20705 – Beltsville Queen’s Chapel United Methodist 7410 Old Muirkirk Rd Church: 301-210-9038 John Collins: 301-317-8573 St. John’s Episcopal Baltimore Ave Church: 301-937-4292 20706 – Lanham Abundant Life Christian Ministries 4200 Forbes Blvd. 103 Phyllis Smith: 240-375-0710 Church: 301-429-2727
PURCHASE PRICE Sr. No. Seller Number of Sale Shares Price per Sale Share Purchase Price [●] SCHEDULE- IV: REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES The Company and Sellers (“Warrantors”) hereby jointly and severally represent, warrant and undertake to the Acquirer that as of the Effective Date, the following Warranties are true and correct in all respects: For the purposes of this Schedule the following terms shall have the meaning set out below attributed to them: “Tax Claim” shall mean any notice of any claim by the Company pursuant to any assessment, administrative or appellate or court proceedings or proposed change or adjustment by any taxing authority concerning, for or in respect of any and all Taxes with respect to any taxable period ending on or before the Effective Date or beginning before and ending on or after the Effective Date (but only in relation to the portion thereof applicable to the period prior to the Effective Date); and “Tax Demand” shall mean any Tax Claim under which demand for payment of Tax is made on or adjustment of any Tax refunds claimed by a Person and outstanding as on date of such Tax Claim is demanded from, a Person by any taxing authority (or any combination of the foregoing). AUTHORITY AND CAPACITY The Company is duly incorporated under the [Companies Act, 2013/1956] and validly existing under the Laws of India. The Warrantors have the legal right, power and authority, including
This is the first of 2 (two) execution pages of the Share Subscription Agreement executed between []. Signed and Delivered ) by the within named “Promoter1” ) in the presence of ) ) _________________________ ) Signed and Delivered ) by the within named “Promoter 2” ) in the presence of ) ) _________________________ ) This is the second of 2 (two) execution pages of the Share Subscription Agreement executed between []. Signed and Delivered for and on behalf of the ) within named “Company” pursuant ) to a resolution passed at the meeting ) of its Board of Directors held on ) ______________________, 2016 ) in the presence of ) _________________________ ) Signed and Delivered ) by the within named “Investor” ) By the of its duly authorised ) representative [] ) in the presence of ) __________________________________ )
Table –Directors Related Action Meetings Proposals Votes For Votes Against Abstain Votes Withhold DNV 1 YR 2 YRS 3 YRS With Mgmt. Against Mgmt. With Policy Against Policy Majority Voting for uncontested Election of Directors 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 Board to appoint additional Directors between annual meetings 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 Amend Articles Board-Related 41 51 46 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 46 4 50 0 Appoint Alternate Internal Statutory Auditor(s) [and Approve Auditor's/Auditors' Remuneration] 54 58 54 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 4 58 0 Appoint Internal Statutory Auditor(s) [and Approve Auditor's/Auditors' Remuneration] 141 219 187 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 187 32 219 0 Approve Decrease in Size of Board 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 Approve Director/Officer Liability and Indemnification 5 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 0 Approve Discharge -- Other 4 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 Approve Discharge of Auditors 14 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 15 0 Approve Discharge of Board and President 88 121 116 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 116 5 121 0 Approve Discharge of Directors and Auditors 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 Approve Discharge of Management 112 147 125 5 0 0 17 0 0 0 125 5 130 0 Approve Discharge of Management and Supervisory Board 7 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 0 Approve Discharge of Supervisory 75 148 141 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 141 4 145 0 Approve Executive Appointment 14 23 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 23 0 Approve Increase in Size of Board 6 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 0 Approve Remuneration of Directors and/or Committee Members 173 200 168 6 0 0 26 0 0 0 168 6 174 0
tracking protocol is included in the attached Supporting Materials. Our history of longitudinal research in this population suggests we can expect a 65% response rate. Analysis. Analysis of survey data will the effects associated with CCOs, and will describe any differential effects for different groups over time. Multivariate regression models will be used to assess the net effects of CCO membership, along with other potential covariates, on each dependent variable. To take into account the longitudinal nature of the dataset, Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) models will be employed, which are appropriate when individuals are observed at several points in time, work for both continuous and categorical outcomes, and accommodate curvilinear trends, which is important given that the study period includes baseline data and staged implementation. For all models, propensity scores will be used to adjust for sociodemographic differences using the method described in Aim 2, below. The output from each regression model will be an adjusted risk ratio with its 95% confidence interval for each predictor; and each model will be fully interpreted in the final report. Aim 2: Evaluate the impact of CCOs on cost & utilization patterns. We will use APAC, Oregon’s comprehensive utilization and claims database, to construct a detailed encounter and cost history for each participant, covering 18 months pre-CCO kickoff and 18 months after. We will assess changes in utilization and costs over time, comparing those who enroll in a CCO to those who do not (Exhibit 4). Exhibit 4. Plan for Claims & Utilization Data to the CCO Evaluation Data Sources. We will use the Medicaid component of Oregon’s APAC database, a comprehensive claims dataset that contains all claims, encounter, and Medicaid
The placement of each piece of food service equipment. Plan shall include any new pieces of equipment being added. Finish schedule Plumbing including floor sinks/drains, make/model of water heater and trash can wash facilities. Labeled separated areas for permit holders for storage (refrigerated, dry goods, freezer, etc.). _____ Manufacturer specification sheets for each piece of new equipment added to the facility for the secondary operation. _____ Completed Secondary Food Service Plan Review Application _____ Proposed menu for Secondary Permitted Facility. Include any consumer advisories required on menus. ______Employee Health Policy for Secondary Facility. Example can be found at: http://www.wakegov.com/food/healthinspections/resources/Pages/employee_health.aspx _____ $250 Plan Review Fee If you have questions, contact one of the Plan Review staff listed below: Jessica Sanders, REHS, Section Chief Plan Review/Recreational Sanitation Section Environmental Health Specialist (919) 856-7417 Rob Richardson, REHS, Team Leader Environmental Health Specialist (919) 857-9356 Rebecca Robbins, REHS Environmental Health Specialist (919) 856-7419 Christina Sancha, REHS Environmental Health Specialist 919) 868-2559 Laura Lerch, REHS Environmental Health Specialist (919) 856-6609 Jennifer Edwards, REHS Environmental Health Specialist (919) 856-7437 Anne Bartoli Environmental Health Specialist (919) 868-9251
Bonnie Barkatt – Teacher – Madison Elementary Edward Bowers – Teacher – Cascade High School Joan Chaiten – Teacher – Gateway Middle School John Crandall – Teacher – Everett High School Sherrie Daurie – Paraeducator – Jackson Elementary Stacy Matthews – Teacher – Heatherwood Middle School Susan Michaelson – General Secretary – Eisenhower Middle School Elna Olson – Driver – Transportation Bridget Slaven – Teacher – Silver Firs Elementary **************************** Any employee may donate shared leave to any other employee. There are, however, restrictions regarding how much leave an employee can donate. Vacation donations: May donate any number of vacation days provided the employee maintains a minimum balance of 10 vacation days after the transfer. May not donate excess vacation that the donor would not be able to take because of an approaching date after which the leave cannot be used. Sick leave donations: May donate any number of sick leave days provided the employee maintains a minimum balance of 22 days of sick leave after the transfer.
Book Now! Important end of life care training Date Time am OR pm Time am OR pm Venue Please book via June 11th 11-12.30 1-2.30pm Great Oaks Hospice, Coleford ) June 12th 10-11.30 2-3.30pm Seminar Room Cirencester Hospital June 12th 12.30-2 2-3.30 Charlton Lane Conference room June 12th 6.30-8pm Unit 10, Highnam Business Park, GL2 8DN June 13th 11-12.30 1-2.30pm Sue Ryder, Cheltenham June 13th 11 -12.30 1-2.30pm Plock Court Gloucester June 15th 11-12.30 1-2.30pm Longfield, Minchinhampton June 18th 11-12.30 1-2.30 Farmers Club Gloucester June 19th 11-12.30 George Moore Community Clinic (Bourton on the water) June 19th 2-3.30 North Cotswolds (Moreton in Marsh)
Shared Education Week Planner Twitter: @SharedEdWeek Monday 8th Tuesday 9th Wednesday 10th Thursday 11th Friday 12th Events across NI Launch Event in Girdwood Centre Belfast (10am) Shared Education Conferences – Department of Education Community Day Using Community Partners to support your programme Where to Next? Lisneal College Derry/Londonderry (10am) Further information and registration Please note that EA will be sending invitations directly to schools to the DE conferences on 9th and 10th October Participating? Who?
either gender? During what hours? either gender? Where will they be expected to sleep? many at once? Is young adult allowed to have parties? Agreement: Shared Is young adult allowed to use caregiver’s car (if applicable)? Rules? Discussion about use of kitchen appliances, laundry facilities, etc.? What are the consequences for breaking or damaging items? Agreement: Shared space: Will young adult and caregiver be sharing a bathroom? Shower schedule? Is there a curfew for using the kitchen? What level of cleanliness is agreed upon for shared space? Agreement: Shared activities: Will young adult and caregiver have meals together? If so, how often? Will young adult and caregiver be spending holidays together? Other joint activities? Agreement: TV / computer / video games: Are rules about when TV can be on? Are there any rules around use of shared computers? Are there rules about playing video games? Agreement: Furnishing / decorating: Are there any restrictions on decoration of the young adult’s bedroom? Can young adult add to furnishing or decorations in common areas? e.g. painting walls, hanging things, waterbeds, etc. Agreement: Privacy: Privacy requests on behalf of young adult? Privacy requests on behalf of caregiver? e.g. before entering room”, “please do not enter room while I’m not home” Agreement: Regular communication: How will young adult and caregiver regularly communicate? House meeting? Other discussion? Agreement: Other areas of discussion: Other areas of discussion: Section 4: Household Chores and Responsibilities Household chore/responsibility: (e.g. doing dishes, cooking, laundry, grocery shopping, yard work, pet care) Who is responsible: (e.g. “young adult”, “caregiver”, “we’ll switch off”, “each responsible for own”) When/how often: (e.g. “monthly”, “weekly”, “as needed”)
Shared Living Quality Assurance Checklist Provider Name: ______________________________________________ Date: __________ Date of Contract: ____________ Individual’s Date of Birth: ____________ Name of Individual Completing this Form Document Date listed on Document (if applies) Check off if found in Record Shared Living Contract Shared Living Questionnaire Copy of DSP Certificate Copy Driver's License (every driver) Copy of HS Diploma or GED Copy of Automobile Registration Copy of Automobile Insurance Copy of Home Owner/Renter's Insurance Proof of Vaccinations for Pets Copy of Member’s Current PCP Copy of CNA-M/CRMA Certificate or RN License Name of Individual Completing this Form Document Date listed on Document (if applies) Check off if found in Record Member Information (MaineCare Manual 21.09 Member Records) Progress Notes that identify progress toward goals outlined in the PCP (includes signature) Progress Notes that document the level of services per the PCP Collected requisite daily documentation
Occupation: Start date with current employer (dd/mmm/yyyy)? Permanent contract? / / Yes / No / / Yes / No Details of any outstanding probation (if applicable): If you are on a fixed contract, please give details of the start & end dates: Start: / / End: / / Start: / / End: / / Basic Salary before tax per annum: Guaranteed Allowances Please state the reason e.g. London Weighting and/or Car Allowance) per annum: TOTAL (Basic + Guaranteed Allowances) per annum: £ £ _________________ £ _________________ £ £ £ _________________ £ _________________ £ Regular Overtime / Commission per annum: £ £ Bonus per annum (please indicate if paid monthly, quarterly or annually) £ Mnth / Qrter / Annual £ Mnth / Qrter / Annual What is your average take home pay per after deductions? (taken from your most recent 3 payslips): £ £ Self-Employed People only Sole Trader or Limited Company?
How many years' accounts or self-assessed tax returns are available? Type of Business? Date business established? Date: Date: Last year’s net profit: £ £ Previous year’s net profit: £ £ Year before net profit: £ £ Limited Company only: Director’s salary for last year? Director’s salary for previous year? Dividend income for last year? Dividend income for previous year? £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ All applicants Details of any other additional income: Child Benefit (per annum): Child Tax Credit (per annum): Working Tax Credit (per annum): Maintenance income (court order or CSA only) Investment or Private Pension income: 2nd job (please provide full details): £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ Are you able to provide of the above stated additional income? Yes / No Yes / No Credit / Other regular commitments How many credit/store cards do you have? Total amount outstanding on all your cards? (including 0% balance transfer cards) £ £
Appendix 2 Shared Parental Leave Examples Example 1 Week 1-2 Week 3 - 13 Week 14-26 Week 27 - 40 Week 41 - 52 Mother Maternity leave Shared parental leave Father Paternity leave* Shared parental leave Example 2 Week 1-2 Week 3 - 13 Week 14-26 Week 27 - 39 Week 40 - 52
Ruiz-Tagle, J. and D. Contreras (2014), CEQ Master Workbook: Chile, August. (SI) Sabirianova Peter, K. (2003). ‘Skill-Biased Transition: The Role of Markets, Institutions, and Technological Change’, IZA DP No.893. Sabirianova Peter, K., (2002). ‘The Great Human Capital Reallocation: A Study of Occupational Mobility in Transitional Russia’, Journal of Comparative Economics, 30(1): 191 – 217. 2014. Editors. The Redistributive Impact of Taxes and Social Spending in Latin America. Special Issue. Public Finance Review, May, Volume 42, Issue 3. Scott, John. 2014. “Redistributive Impact and Efficiency of Mexico’s Fiscal System.” In Lustig, Nora, Carola Pessino and John Scott. 2014. Editors. The Redistributive Impact of Taxes and Social Spending in Latin America. Special Issue. Public Finance Review, May, Volume 42, Issue 3. Shorrocks, A.F. (2013), “Decomposition Procedures for Distributional Analysis: A Unified Framework Based on the Shapley Value”, Journal of Economic Inequality, pp. 1-28. Titterton, M. 2006. Social policy in a cold climate: health and social welfare in Russia. Social Policy and Administration, 40, 88-103. UNICEF, 2011. The situation analysis of children in the Russian Federation: on the way to the equal opportunity society. Moscow: UNICEF. Voskoboynikov, I. (2012). ‘New Measures of Output, Labor and Capital in Industries of the Russian Economy’ GGDC Research Memorandum GD-123. http://www.rug.nl/feb/onderzoek/onderzoekscentra/ggdc/index; WHO, 2000. The World Health Report. Health systems: Improving performance Geneva, Switzerland, World Health Organisation. World Development Report 2013. Jobs. World Bank 2013 Bank (1999). ‘Russia: Targeting and the longer-term poor’, Report No.19377-RU. Background papers for this project:
Validated by Job Incumbent Signature: ____________________________Date: _________________________ Confirmed by Chief Executive Officer Signature: ____________________________Date: _________________________
the governing board, or its designees, and the academic senate shall reach mutual agreement by written resolution, regulation, or policy of the governing board effectuating such recommendations. According to Administrative Procedure 2511: “The Board or its designee shall receive and consider advice from the DAS on the above cited "academic and professional matters" and the Board or its designee shall accept the DAS recommendation unless there are exceptional circumstances or compelling reasons not to. Should the Board or its designee not accept a DAS recommendation, the Board or its designee shall communicate promptly the reasons in writing.” Recommends to: Education Committee and College Roundtable Frequency of Meetings: per month during academic year
Length of Term: One year How Selected: Officers are elected by all classified staff members Purpose The Classified Senate will represent classified employees in the college’s governance system; provide a body representing the various needs, concerns, and viewpoints of the classified staff not related to union negotiation matters; provide a means through which the classified staff will coordinate with administration and faculty to assure opportunities for input from classified staff regarding college business and classified representation on college committees, thus assisting in the shared governance process;
Alliance Serial Distributed Policy Alliance Shared Print Trust Draft October 9, 2015 The Alliance Serial Distributed Print Policy is entered into by member libraries of the Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries (the Alliance) who are signatories of the Memorandum of Understanding for the Alliance Shared Print Trust. This program is developed as part of a process for sharing the costs and effort regarding the long-term retention of print journals and serials through a collective approach to providing a distributed print archive for identified titles. The policies contained in this document have been reviewed and approved by libraries participating in the Alliance Shared Print Trust. The following agreement provides assurance that the journals designated under this agreement will be retained and available for research and educational purposes as long as the need reasonably exists, as designed in the general framework of the MOU for the Alliance Shared Print Trust thus allowing participating Alliance libraries to consider withdrawing duplicates of said items from their local collections, and to rely with confidence on access to the retained copies. Any Alliance library may at its discretion retain duplicates of journals retained under this agreement by other members of the Alliance. No library will be required to discard any materials. 1. Storage Obligations of Member Institutions 1.1 Obligations. Member Institutions agree to maintain and store the journals identified by each institution for a term of twenty five (25) years with the understanding that this Agreement will be reviewed every five years to determine the continuing needs for the maintenance and storage of identified journals in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Alliance Shared Print Trust. The review would be initiated by the then current chair of the Alliance Shared Collection Development Committee or the Executive Director of the Alliance. The term commences from the time designated in the MOU for the Alliance Shared Print Trust. 1.2. Original Form. Member Institutions maintain all of the journals in their original form whenever possible. If necessary because of damage to or loss of the original of any of the journals, a hard copy facsimile may be used to fill in gaps. Microform runs of serials are acceptable if that is the only format available for a journal back file. However, it is strongly recommended that if a print run of a journal is available that that should be the preserved copy designated for the Alliance Shared Print Trust. 1.3. Repairs and Restorations. Member Institution shall perform such repairs and/or restorations to the retained journals as are possible and necessary to maintain the integrity of the original artifacts.
Weekly Plan for Shared Reading Skill Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Concepts about Print Point out title, author, illustrator page where we begin reading Revisit title, author, illustrator, where we begin to read General tracking of text Focus on punctuation author, illustrator, where we begin to read tracking of text, point to each word to reinforce correspondence between spoken/written words on punctuation Revisit title, author, illustrator, where we begin to read Specific tracking of text Focus on punctuation Revisit title, author, illustrator, where we begin to read Final rereading of book High Frequency Words Pause to discuss selected HFWs Reinforce selected HFWs Vocabulary Pause to discuss specific vocabulary words, use context (i.e., pictures or text) to determine meaning Revisit selected vocabulary words Revisit selected vocabulary words Comprehension based on title, cover, back cover periodically to make new predictions Writing Extension Patterned writing New ending Favorite part Different version with new character
Providing information about what route users can expect and susceptibility to damage allows them to make their own decisions as to whether their intended use is responsible, but this sign does not make clear that cyclists, or other users, should therefore consider not using the path during or after wet weather. The cycle logo also suggests the message only applies to cyclists, or indeed that only cyclists enjoy access rights along this path. Violet Woods Millennium Nature Trail – a good example of signage to help manage access The Millennium Nature Trail is a waymarked path through the woodland around Wiltonburn Park. The path is used daily, and is particularly popular with local dog walkers, as well as visitors to Hawick. Along the north side of the park, the path runs through an avenue of beech trees. Most of the path is unsurfaced, which is fine for pedestrian use year-round, but during wet weather, cycle and equestrian use can cause problems. Rather than try and restrict access by gates or signs, Scottish Borders Council took the positive decision to erect suitably worded signs either end of the path which remind horse riders, cyclists and dog walkers of their responsibilities under the Scottish Outdoor Access Code. Keys to success The Millennium Nature Trail signs encourage everyone to respect the woodland for mutual enjoyment, rather than pointing a finger at one particular type of user. Signs have been kept simple rather than risk confusing people or diluting the most important messages with too much information. Focusing on specific messages is far more effective than simply reminding or advising people to “Know the Code” – those who already know the Code but aren’t adhering to it are likely to ignore such signs, and those that don’t would then need to look up the Code on a smartphone, or on return home, neither of which is likely to achieve the required responsible behaviour. Signage on downhill or other bespoke mountain bike routes Legally, rights of responsible access apply to most land, including paths or routes created for mountain bikes. Signs such as this which suggest no entry to a one-way cycle trail conflict with the Land Reform Act, and with the Scottish Outdoor Access Code.
1 Stakeholder participation and buy-in 2 Timely decisions from the project team and executive leadership 3 Project leadership will have adequate time for project planning activities 4 Project will be appropriately staffed with dedicated resources for phases 5 Appropriate resources from the professional services vendors will be dedicated to the project in order to complete the project within the defined timelines 6 No baseline changes to the SHARE system 7 Deployment/Implementation will be at the DWS agency level only. 1.6 In this section identify and describe how each risk will be managed. Include the steps that will be taken to maximize activity that will result in minimizing probability and impact of each risk. Risk 1 Description Loss of funding/ insufficient funding Analysis could reveal business problem/opportunity where the solution exceeds the budget Probability Possible Impact High Funds may not be sufficient to accomplish identified solutions. Mitigation Strategy Contingency funding commitment of Financial Resources beyond those anticipated Contingency Plan Risk 2 Description - Unavailability of internal resources will impact the project schedule and quality of reviews and Probability Possible Impact Schedules will be delayed, costs may increase and project may not receive the thought and testing required for smooth transition into production/implementation Surprises may occur during the initial go-live period
Assist consultant team with system data clean-up and develop NMDWS Technical business processes / procedure manuals 5.5 Complete the chart below identifying the project team members and details concerning their project commitment. Project staff should include State, Contract, Customer / Business Owner(s), or Vendor team members 5.5.1 Role Project Responsibility Skills Required Number of Required Estimated Start Date Duration Required Project Team Project Manager Lead team through Planning and implementation phase Project Management 1 7/1/2010 9 Months Core Team Review deliverables, assure quality Project Management 4 7/1/2010 9 Months Infrastructure Support Provide PeopleSoft environments and support for project phases. enterprise expertise 2 7/1/2010 9 months Business SMEs Business knowledge for design effort Grants, Budget, Procurement, Contracts, Commitment Control, Time & Funding Control 5 7/1/2010 9 months Technical SMEs Technical knowledge of PeopleSoft system DWS PeopleSoft 2 7/1/2010 9 months User Acceptance Testing Test delivered functionality Grants business and application knowledge ? 7/1/2010 3 months User Account Administration Maintain user ids and security permission on the system DWS PeopleSoft Admin 2 7/1/2010 9 months
View Legal comments Client comments Objectives and good faith The parties must act in good faith, carry on the business for the benefit of the participants and all profits are to be shared between the participants, in proportion to their shares and units. Composition and proceedings of the board Decisions of the are to be made by a majority resolution, other than certain matters that are to be resolved by either a ‘special majority board resolution’ or ‘unanimous resolution’. What is the minimum percentage holding required to permit a participant to appoint a representative director: Certain decisions of the board should be made by (select only 1): special majority board resolution:_____% (commonly 75%) unanimous resolution 25 % 50 % other (specify_________) Shareholders’ and Unitholders’ meetings and resolutions Decisions of participants are to be made by a majority resolution, other than certain matters that must be resolved by either a ‘special majority resolution’ or ‘unanimous resolution’. Certain decisions of the participants should be made by (select only 1): special majority resolution:_____% (commonly 75%) unanimous resolution Funding of the group Each participant has an obligation to ensure that the group has sufficient working capital to conduct the business. Working capital may be raised by loans from the participants or borrowings by the company and trust, supported by guarantees by the participants. To the extent the participants are providing working capital to the business by way of loans, the agreement can specify the terms on which the finance is provided, such as whether interest is payable. Stapling of shares and units The group must ensure that the shares and units on issue are held by the participants in proportion to their participation interests. A participant who transfers a share or unit must transfer the corresponding share or unit held by them at the same time.
Shareholding Pattern – 31-12-2017 Shareholding Pattern – 30-09-2017 Shareholding Pattern – 30-06-2017 Shareholding Pattern – 31-03-2017 Shareholding Pattern – 31-12-2016 Shareholding Pattern – 30-09-2016 Shareholding Pattern – 30-06-2016 Shareholding Pattern – 31-03-2016
same is excluded by an ante nuptial contract or where s 17(6) of Proclamation 15 of 1928 applies. Held, an agreement on the matrimonial property regime is valid and enforceable inter partes. Held, a judge a quo has advantages which this court does not have in that he has the opportunity to hear and see witnesses and observe their demeanour. As such, an appeal will not overrule the finding of facts unless it is clear that the judge was wrong. This court found that evidence of Pastor Avia corroborated that of the respondent in all material respects rather than the version of the appellant. The order of the court a quo is set aside and substituted by an order that the marriage between the parties is a marriage in community of property and of profit and loss. As a result, the appeal being partially successful, the appellant is ordered to pay costs occasioned by the hearing to determine the proprietary consequences of the marriage between the parties and no order is made in respect of the costs on appeal. In the result, parties are to approach the Registrar of the High Court (Northern Local Division) to request a status hearing from the managing judge to give directions as to the further progress of the matter.
eg pay double the amount of maintenance claimed by respondent. In any event, to have made orders in total disregard of the agreement between the parties (and at least implicitly sanctioned by the court a quo) and the audi alterim rule amounted to a vitiating irregularity and there’s no basis to allow it to stand. Apart from this, the orders are clearly prejudicial to appellant. When it comes to costs, the court a quo correctly found against the appellant on the only issue that it had to decide at the hearing, namely the proprietary regime applicable to the marriage. It follows that the respondent is entitled to the costs of that hearing as she was successful in respect of the issue that had to be determined. As far as the appeal is concerned, the respondent opposed all aspects thereof and although appellant has not succeeded in establishing that the court a quo erred in its finding that the marriage was in community of property he has been successful in his attack on the other orders granted by the court a quo. At the hearing of this appeal counsel for respondent however conceded that the orders a quo other than the finding relating to the marriage being in community of property cannot stand. Arguments on appeal thus virtually exclusively focussed on the issue of the proprietary consequences of the marriage. The appeal can thus be termed to be partially successful. In the circumstances I am of the view that each party should pay its own costs on appeal and the order I make reflects this position. In the result I make the following order: The appeal is reinstated;
Maximum KeywordQuery text length Not Available in SharePoint 2010 4 KB Maximum length of eDiscovery KeywordQuery text at Search service application level Not Available in SharePoint 2010 20 KB Maximum length of KeywordQuery text at Search service application level Not Available in SharePoint 2010 20 KB Maximum size of documents pulled down by crawler Not Available in SharePoint 2010 64 MB (3 MB for Excel documents) Navigable results from search Not Available in SharePoint 2010 100,000 per request per Search service application Number of entries in a custom entity extraction dictionary Not Available in SharePoint 2010 1 million Number of entries in a custom search dictionary Not Available in SharePoint 2010 5,000 terms per tenant Number of entries in a thesaurus Not Available in SharePoint 2010 1 million Ranking models Not Available in SharePoint 2010 1,000 per tenant Results removal Not Available in SharePoint 2010 No limit Term size Not Available in SharePoint 2010 300 characters Unique terms in the index Not Available in SharePoint 2010 2^31 (>2 billion terms) Unique contexts used for ranking Not Available in SharePoint 2010 15 unique contexts per rank model User defined full text indexes Not Available in SharePoint 2010 10 User Profile Service limits User profiles 2,000,000 per service application 2,000,000 per service application Social tags, notes and ratings 500,000,000 per social database 500,000,000 per social database Maximum Number of Imported Via FIM Not Published 1000000 Content deployment limits
operations One per CPU core per Web server One per CPU core per Web server Excel Services limits Maximum workbook size Not Published 10 MB Machine Translation Service limits file size for binary files Not Available in SharePoint 2010 524,288 KB per file Input file size for text files Not Available in SharePoint 2010 15,360 KB per file Maximum character count for Microsoft Word Documents Not Available in SharePoint 2010 10,000,000 per document Total concurrent translation processes Not Available in SharePoint 2010 5 Delay between translations Not Available in SharePoint 2010 59 minutes Number of translations per translation process Not Available in SharePoint 2010 1,000 per process Maximum concurrent translation requests Not Available in SharePoint 2010 300 Files per translation job Not Available in SharePoint 2010 100,000 files Machine Translation Service database size Not Available in SharePoint 2010 1,000,000 files Office Web Application Service limits Cache size 100 GB 100 GB Renders One per document per second per CPU core per application server (maximum eight cores) One per document per second per CPU core per application server (maximum eight cores) OneNote concurrent merge operations Not Available in SharePoint 2010 8 per document
they were married In Community of Property; they conducted their affairs as if they were so married in community of property; There was no reference of their marriage having been out community of property either by reference or operation of law; In order to prove the common understanding of their regime, plaintiff paid off her loan of N$40 000 at SWABOU and the reason for such actions by plaintiff was that they wanted to clear the said debt before they applied for a new one in order to buy a house in Windhoek. They bought the house which is registered in both their names. [18] She went further to that they shared financial responsibilities on a pro rata basis, e.g electricity and water. In addition, she purchased all household furniture and did not keep receipts as she did not anticipate this being an issue later. [19] It is also her evidence that she was not an alcoholic, was not irresponsible and did not commit adultery as alleged by plaintiff. She further stated that plaintiff would absent himself from the matrimonial home during weekends without explanation. While this was going, according to her, he continued to service the mortgage while she purchased food, electricity, water and furniture, both in Windhoek and in their village. They have four motor vehicles which are fully paid for and she is presently using one of them, a Toyota VVTI Registration No. N3026SH which vehicle she would like to continue using and retain as hers. [20] Further she would like custody of both minor children and that plaintiff should pay maintenance in the sum of N$2500 per month for both children. This witness was intensely cross-examined by Ms. Kishi, but, she stood by her averments and denied being a wasteful person, an alcoholic or a spend thrift. [21] The next witness was Pastor Josef Avia of Evangelical Lutheran Church in Namibia. He is a licenced Marriage Officer. It is his evidence that he explained the procedure to the parties when he solemnized their marriage. It was further his
<!-- identifies to scripting elements that this is a v4 master page. required for scrolling? --> <script type="text/javascript"> var _fV4UI = true; </script> <!-- load SharePoint javascript --> <SharePoint:ScriptLink language="javascript" Defer="true" runat="server"/> <style type="text/css"> /* fix scrolling on list */ #s4-bodyContainer { position: relative; } /* hide body scrolling (SharePoint will handle) */ body { height:100%; overflow:hidden; width:100%; background-color:#cccc99; } /* popout breadcrumb menu needs background color for firefox */ .s4-breadcrumb-menu { background:#F2F2F2;
WFE 2 Web Front End See above APP 1 Application Server Application server responsible for hosting various SharePoint 2010 services in a redundant fashion APP 2 Application Server See above DB 1 Database Server SQL Server responsible for hosting all SharePoint 2010 content and configuration databases; Clustered with below Server Planning Worksheet Prepared For: Contoso, Inc. Prepared By: Some Partner, LLP Date: 31 January 2013 Server Name Host OS CPU RAM (GB) System Disk (GB) Data Disk (GB) Virtualized? Software WFE 1 2008 R2 2.5 GHz Quad Core 8 80 120 No SharePoint 2010 WFE 2 2008 R2 2.5 GHz Quad Core 8 80 120 No SharePoint 2010 APP 1 2008 R2 2.5 GHz Quad Core 8 80 80 No SharePoint 2010 APP 2 2008 R2 2.5 GHz Quad Core 8 80 80 No SharePoint 2010 DB 1 2008 R2 2.5 GHz Quad Core 16 80 500 No SQL 2008 R2 DB 2 2008 R2 2.5 GHz Quad Core 16 80 500 No SQL 2008 R2 Service Account Planning Worksheet Prepared For: Contoso, Inc. Prepared By: Some Partner, LLP Date: 31 January 2013 Service Account Name Domain Managed? Notes SVC_SharePoint CONTOSO Yes SharePoint farm account SVC_SQL CONTOSO No SQL Server Admin Account SVC_WebAppPool CONTOSO Yes Web Application Pool (SharePoint – 80 ) SVC_Search CONTOSO Yes SharePoint Server Search SVC_WebSvcAppPoolDefault CONTOSO Yes Default App Pool acct for SharePoint Web Services
Services Planning Worksheet Prepared By: Some Partner, LLP Date: 31 January 2013 Service Name WFE 1 WFE 2 APP 1 APP 2 DB 1 DB 2 Search Admin Search Non-Index Search Index Notes Access Database Service Not required Application Registry Service Not required Business Data Connectivity Central Administration Not LB, but could be Document Conversions Launcher Service Not required Document Conversions Load Balancer Service Not required Excel Calculation Services Lotus Notes Connector Not required Managed Metadata Service Incoming Email Not required Subscription Settings Service Not required User Code Service Not required Web Application Requires NLB or hardware LB Workflow Timer Service PerformancePoint Service Not required PowerPoint Service Not required