zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks Vertebrate Species List STUDENT Date Native SEKI Reptiles California Legless Lizard Anniella pulchra Rubber Boa Charina bottae Western Pond Turtle Clemmys marmorata Western Whiptail Cnemidophorus tigris Racer Coluber constrictor Sharp-tailed Snake Contia tenuis Western Rattlesnake Crotalus viridis Ringneck Diadophis punctatus Northern Alligator Lizard Elgaria coerulea Southern Alligator Lizard Elgaria multicarinata Gilbert Skink Eumeces gilberti Night Snake Hypsiglena torquata Common Kingsnake Lampropeltis getulus California Mountain Kingsnake Lampropeltis zonata Striped Racer Masticophis lateralis Gopher Snake Pituophis melanoleucus Long-nosed Snake Rhinocheilus lecontei Sagebrush Lizard Sceloporus graciosus Western Lizard Sceloporus occidentalis Southwestern Black-headed Snake Tantilla hobartsmithi Western Aquatic Garter Snake Thamnophis couchii Western Terrestrial Garter Snake Thamnophis elegans Common Garter Thamnophis sirtalis Side-blotched Lizard Uta stansburiana
List of sites contained in water supply scheme or grouped inductions Caboolture System Caboolture Weir Moodlu Quarry Waraba Pump Station Wararba Weir Catchment Induction Covers all Catchment and Recreation Areas under Seqwater control. Logan River Irrigation Scheme Albert River Weir Beaudesert Weir Bromelton Weir Cedar Grove Weir Rathdowney Weir Maclean Weir Lower Lockyer Valley Irrigation Scheme Brightview Channel Brightview Channel (BR1 Lateral) Brightview Weir Buaraba Diversion Channel Buaraba Creek Diversion Control Structure Buaraba Creek Supply Channel Buaraba Creek Weir O'Reillys’ Weir Potters’ Weir Seven Mile Lagoon Seven Mile Lagoon Diversion Channel Seven Mile Lagoon Diversion Control Structure Sippels’ Weir Wilsons’ Weir Network - Chemical Dosing Facilities Alexandra Hills Reservoir Chambers Flat WQMF Ferntree WQMF Gramzow Road WQMF Heinemann Road Reservoir Landsborough WQMF Noosa WQMF Staplyton WQMF Maroochy Dam System Cooloolabin Dam Poona Dam South Maroochy Intake Weir Wappa Dam Wappa Pump Station Network - Non-Chemical Dosing Facilities Covers all Network Workplaces that are not stated in the above grouping. Pie Creek Irrigation Scheme Irrigation Channels Pie Creek Pump Station Pie Creek Shed Siphons Upper Lockyer Valley Irrigation Scheme Bob Birds Hut Carpendale Weir Clarendon Diversion Channel Clarendon Pump Station Clarendon Weir Crowley Vale Weir Flagstone Creek Weir Gatton Gauging Station and Weir Gatton Weir Glenore Grove Weir Grantham Weir Jordan 1 Weir Jordan 2 Weir Kentville Weir Laidley Creek Diversion Weir Lower Flagstone Creek Weir Lower Tenthill Creek Weir Ma Ma Creek Weir Moreton Vale Pipeline Mulgowie Weir Redbank Creek Pump Station Redbank Creek Weir Sandy Creek Weir Showgrounds Weir Tenthill Creek Weir Warrill Valley Irrigation Scheme Aratula Weir Churchbank Weir Kent’s Lagoon including all diversion offtakes (Black’s and Normanby Gully) Kents Lagoon Diversion Weir and Kents Lagoon Offtake Railway Weir Roadvale Regulator Toohills Crossing Gauging Station, measuring flume Upper Warrill Diversion Weir and Upper Warrill Diversion Channel Warrill Diversion Weir (Junction Weir) Warrill Weirs and Diversion Offtakes (grouping) Warroolaba Weir, Diversion Offtake and Channel West Branch Weir and Diversion Channel
Unsatisfactory and needs urgent improvement – Important weaknesses outweigh strengths Inspection area 1: Standards Evaluation Evidence 1.1 Standards and progress overall 1. Nearly all pupils make good or very good progress at Headlands over time, taking into consideration their achievements and attainments against their baseline information when they join the school. They make good/significant progress in line with their ability and individual needs. All pupils who Headlands School move onto further education, training or work or specialist provision. All pupils leave Headlands School with a good variety of recognised qualifications, including GCSEs, Entry Levels, BTEC, Agored Cymru and ASDAN qualifications, which are appropriate to their ability, individual needs and interests. (See later for further details and breakdown of qualifications). Over the past 3 all pupils have moved onto college, training or work. Consequently, there are no pupils who are NEET (see evidence IA1 for 3 year breakdown) 2. Nearly all pupils make good progress with their Individual Education Plan (IEP) targets. The pattern has remained quite steady for the past 3 years. There is a considerable increase with the pupils fully meeting their IEP targets in the last 2 years. Nearly all pupils work hard on their specific IEP targets in most sessions. The majority of pupils fully understand their targets and make good progress towards these in lessons. Of the very few pupils who did not meet IEP targets, records show that extenuating circumstances contributed to these targets not being met. 3. Lesson observations show that nearly all pupils make good progress with work in line with their abilities. They demonstrate that nearly all pupils make good progress in learning during the lessons. 1. Evidence file Post-16 evaluation Evidence IA1 2. Evidence file IEP evaluation 3. Lesson observation file Evidence IA1 4. Scrutiny of work evaluation 5. Evidence file Examination report Evidence IA1 6. Post-16 evaluation SER
1. Facility Data Original Construction Architectural Drawings: firm, date Structural Drawings: firm, date Additions 1. Architectural Drawings: firm, date Structural Drawings: firm, date Remodeling/Renovations Architectural Drawings: firm, date 2. Structural Drawings: firm, date Reports Geotechnical: firm, report title, date Hazardous Materials: firm, report date Structural Evaluation Report: firm, report title, date
Geotechnical/Geologic site condition: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Structural damage: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Non-structural damage: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Contents and furnishings damage: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Post-earthquake inspection tag: xxxxxxxxxxxx Estimated down time: xxxxxxxxxxxx Estimated repair costs: xxxxxxxxxxxx Estimated repair time: xxxxxxxxxxxx Table 5- 3 No. Item Description Photo No. Type* Gravity Load System Deficiencies: Split ring connections: Slipping or do not satisfy calculations Truss Top Chords: Un-Braced Bolted connections: Slipping or do not satisfy calculations Plywood gusset plates: Insufficient nailing web members Cut or missing Truss Type 1: Overstressed due to snow loads Truss top and bottom chords: Wood splitting at the connections Steeple support connection: Inadequate connection Suspended ceiling support framing: Inadequate connection
M-6 Describe upgrade B 6-1 SK-32 Provide timing for work M-7 fire suppression piping B 6-1 SK-33 2015 M-8 Provide natural gas seismic valve B 6-1 SK-34 2015 M-9 Describe upgrade B 6-1 SK-35 Provide timing for work E-1 Describe upgrade B 6-1 SK-36 Provide timing for work E-2 Describe upgrade B 6-1 SK-37 Provide timing for work E-3 Describe upgrade B 6-1 SK-38 Provide timing for work C-1 Describe upgrade B 6-1 SK-39 Provide timing for work C-2 Describe upgrade B 6-1 SK-40 Provide timing for work R – Roof - indicates an upgrade item that should occur during a scheduled re-roof project B – Balance - indicates an upgrade item that can be installed independent of a scheduled re-roof project Comments: Table 6- 4
Appendix B – Photographs This appendix should include a picture of each deficiency noted in this report. In addition, the following minimum photographs of the property should be included: Google photograph of the property One (1) photograph of each of the four major elevations of the building
Vibration isolators: Snubbers are not provided on HVAC units on roof. Furnace: XXXXXXXXX Water heater: XXXXXXXXX Boiler: XXXXXXXXX Piping: Fire suppression piping is not braced. Natural gas seismic shut-off Church requirement for buildings in Seismic Design Category D, E, or F Ducts: XXXXXXXXX Transformers: XXXXXXXXX Switchgear: XXXXXXXXX Lighting fixtures: XXXXXXXXX Satellite dish: XXXXXXXXX Sound system: XXXXXXXXX Comments: 5- 6 No. Item Description Photo No. FC-1 Bookcases: Bookcase in the office is 6 ft high and not anchored. FC-2 Filing cabinets: Filing cabinet (4 drawers) in the office is not anchored. FC-3 Computers: Desktop computers in the office are not anchored. FC-4 Copier: Desktop copier is not anchored. FC-5 substances: Glass bottles of toxic chemicals are stored in open shelves.
No. Item Upgrade R or B2 Plan No. Sketch No. Recommended Upgrade Year/Timing Actual Upgrade Date NS-1 Brace top of partitions B 6-1 SK-18 Next reroof NS-2 Fasten tracks B 6-1 SK-19 2015 NS-3 Brace ceiling systems B 6-1 SK-20 2015 NS-4 Replace glazing B 6-1 SK-21 2015 NS-5 Describe upgrade B 6-1 SK-22 Provide timing for work NS-6 Describe upgrade R 6-2 SK-23 Provide timing for work NS-7 Describe upgrade R 6-2 SK-24 Provide timing for work NS-8 Describe upgrade B 6-1 SK-25 Provide timing for work NS-9 Describe upgrade B 6-1 SK-26 Provide timing for work R – Roof - indicates an upgrade item that should during a scheduled re-roof project B – Balance - indicates an upgrade item that can be installed independent of a scheduled re-roof project Comments: Table 6- 3 No. Item Upgrade R or B3 Plan No. Sketch No. Recommended Upgrade Year/Timing Actual Upgrade Date M-1 Brace control panel B 6-1 SK-27 2015 M-2 Describe upgrade B 6-1 SK-28 Provide timing for work
M-3 Provide snubbers R 6-2 SK-29 2015 M-4 Describe upgrade B 6-1 SK-30 Provide timing for work M-5 Describe upgrade B 6-1 SK-31 Provide timing for work M-6 Describe upgrade B 6-1 SK-32 Provide timing for work M-7 Brace fire suppression piping B 6-1 SK-33 2015 M-8 Provide natural gas seismic B 6-1 SK-34 2015 M-9 Describe upgrade B 6-1 SK-35 Provide timing for work E-1 Describe upgrade B 6-1 SK-36 Provide timing for work E-2 Describe upgrade B 6-1 SK-37 Provide timing for work E-3 Describe upgrade B 6-1 SK-38 Provide timing for work C-1 Describe upgrade B 6-1 SK-39 Provide timing for work C-2 Describe upgrade B 6-1 SK-40 Provide timing for work R – Roof - indicates an upgrade item that should occur during a scheduled re-roof project B – Balance - indicates an upgrade item that can be installed independent of a scheduled re-roof project Comments:
M-7 Brace fire suppression piping B 6-1 SK-33 2015 M-8 Provide natural gas seismic valve B 6-1 SK-34 2015 M-9 Describe upgrade B 6-1 SK-35 Provide timing for work E-1 Describe upgrade B 6-1 SK-36 Provide timing for work E-2 Describe upgrade B 6-1 SK-37 Provide timing for work E-3 Describe upgrade B 6-1 SK-38 Provide timing for work C-1 Describe upgrade B 6-1 SK-39 Provide timing for work C-2 Describe upgrade B 6-1 SK-40 Provide timing for work R – Roof - indicates an upgrade item that should occur during a scheduled re-roof project B – Balance - indicates an upgrade item that can be installed independent of a scheduled re-roof project Comments: 6- 4 No. Item Upgrade R or B4 Plan No. Sketch No. Recommended Upgrade Year/Timing Actual Upgrade Date
3. Site Hazards 3- 1 Description: Unknown Shear wave velocity: Vs value - note how determined Site class: Site - note how determined Soil stability: Expansive or collapsible Reference: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Comments: Table 3- 2 Hazard MCE Spectral Acceleration1 0.2 sec period: 0.XX g 1.0 sec period: 0.XX g Vulnerability2 Fault rupture: Yes or No Slope failure: Yes or No Liquefaction: Yes or No Distance to Nearest Fault3 X miles References:
High connection: No out-of-plane wall anchors exist nor does a load path exist to transfer diaphragm shear to the classroom or offices walls. Entrance canopies: Anchorage of canopies is inadequate. Stairs: URM is unacceptable in the stairways. * G – Gravity EQ – Earthquake W – Wind S - Snow Comments: Table 5- 4 No. Item Description Photo No. Dry rot: Evidence of dry rot exists in the soffit at the northwest corner of the warehouse. Mildew: Evidence of mildew exists in the ceiling of the boiler room. Termite: Evidence of termite damage exists in the foundation next to the south stairway. Settlement: Approximately 1” of settlement was observed at the front entry. Corrosion: Corrosion was observed in rebar in the concrete column at the south end of the warehouse. Comments:
Comments: 6. Recommendations Notes to EOR: The items listed are to correspond numerically to those in Table 5-3. Tables 5-1, 5-2, 6-1 and 6-2 through 6-4, if applicable, are to be updated when structural upgrades are performed. Table 6- 1 No. Items and Comments Upgrade R or B1 Plan No. Sketch No. Recommended Upgrade Year/Timing Actual Upgrade Date Gravity Load System Upgrade Measures: S-1 Split ring connection R 6-2 SK-? Next reroof S-5 Truss web members R 6-2 SK-? 2019 Lateral Load System Upgrade Measures - Listed upgrade measures are intended to achieve the Basic Safety Objective (Life Safety at 2/3 MCE and Collapse Prevention for MCE per ASCE/SEI 41-06): (EOR: If the seismic evaluation shows that the building meets the criteria of the “Seismic Evaluation”, upgrades are not required, and the seismic upgrade costs should be $0. List only those upgrade measures needed to increase the performance level to the “Seismic Upgrade” requirements) S-11 Diaphragm blocking R 6-2 SK-? Next reroof S-12 S-13 Wall strengthening B 6-1 SK-? Next R&I project that affects the walls S-12 S-13 Wall and footing strengthening R 6-1 SK-? Next R&I project that affects the walls
Maryland Department of Human Resources Office of Licensing and Monitoring 311 W. Saratoga Street Baltimore, Maryland 21201 Office: 410.767.7871 Fax: 410.333.8408 Child Placement Agency Report Provider Organization: Seraaj Family Homes, Inc. Licensing Agency: Department of Human Resources Contracting Agency(s): DHR, CFSA Name of Chief Administrator: Celeste Bryant Email: License Type: Treatment Foster Care Type of Inspection: Quarterly Name and Address of CPA Office License Capacity DHR Contract Limit Census by Placing Agency License#/ Exp. date Date of site Inspection Seraaj Family Homes, Inc. – TFC 6811 Kenilworth Avenue Riverdale, MD 20737 Unlimited 0 CFSA 48 #00305/ 2/17/16 11/5/14 Seraaj Family Homes, Inc. – TFC 515 E. Joppa Rd, Suite 304 Towson, MD 21286 Unlimited 25 DHR 11 #00368/ 2/17/16 11/6/14 Inspection Summary Number of Records Reviewed: Youth 10 Staff 5 Foster Parent 8 Adoptive Parent N/A Number of Interviews: Youth 0 Staff 0 Foster Parent 0 CPA Office Inspection: Approved Number of ILP Apartments Inspected: N/A Number of Foster Homes Inspected: 0 COMAR Violation: Yes X No If Yes, list Cited Violation(s) below: Violation(s) Findings 07.05.01.10 A (4) The Riverdale site does not provide storage and maintenance of client or personnel records 07.05.01.14 B The Riverdale site does not maintain child placement case management staff or supervisors 07.02.21.08 A (2) 3/10 client records didn’t document treatment team meetings 07.02.02.17 (7) 1/10 client record didn’t document a physical exam; 1/10 didn’t document a dental exam. 07.05.02.18 D (2) 1/10 client records didn’t document birth certificate 07.05.02.18 D (6) 1/10 client record didn’t document immunizations 07.05.01.15 D (2) 3/10 client records documented social work contact by non-credentialed staff 07.05.01.13 A (1) 1/5 records didn’t document correct job description 07.05.01.13 C (1) 1/5 staff record didn’t document physical exam
leaders in evidence-based practice every leader and every school improves every year research and data to underpin policy and practice promoting the development of innovative practices and approaches to meet the changing needs of the people of NSW We strive to excel and invite the best ideas from everyone in and outside the department We are flexible, innovative, responsive and reliable identifying effective transition strategies at a systemic and local level for students moving into and out of schooling to help deliver positive outcomes for learners All children make a strong start in life and learning and make a successful transition to school All young people finish school well prepared for higher education, training and work We ensure that every student has access to high-quality public education
To go through the mill – Pro&i sito i rešeto Over my dead body – Samo preko mene mrtvog He who laughs last, laughs best – Ko se zadnji najsla)e se smije Let the dust settle – Nek' se slegne prašina The last drop that makes the cup run over – Kap koja je prelila (ašu Read between the – ,itati izme)u redova Get up on the wrong side of the bed – Ustati na lijevu nogu Out of the blue – Kao grom iz vedra neba Comparing apples and oranges – Porediti babe i žabe Have a screw loose – Fali mu daska u glavi To reinvent the – Izumiti toplu vodu Kick against the pricks – I&i uz Bosti se s rogatima In his – Na njegovom mjestu It's a piece of cake – To je ma(iji kašalj Radoznao kao koza Curious like a goat kao lopov Ugly like a thief Pokondirena tikva Uppity pumpkin Sta tu izvodis besne gliste. Stop acting out like rabid earthworms. Sta gledas u mene, jel mi rogovi? Why are you staring at me, am I growing horns? Drzi se ko pijan plota. Hanging onto it like a drunk for the fence. Papucic MACHOISM, BRAVADO, MALE CHAUVINIST PIGS, AND ABUSE OF CHILDREN: The following two are from books , not from people. But those books marred people. Serbia started both World Wars. Rani sina pa na vojsku – Srbija se umiriti ne moze. Рани сина па шаљи у војску, Србија се умирити не може!
Ground Vehicle Army (TARDEC) Closely aligned TARDEC offers several pilot opportunities from theater driven upgrades MRAP) to new ground vehicle developments (JLTV & GCV Pilots and System 2020 technology will increase in sophistication over time Missile Raytheon Missile Systems Loosely Aligned Focus on the integration of all the components from a stakeholder point of view Disk models fairly mature, system tool and date multi-scale not very mature Jet Engine Pratt & Whitney Loosely Aligned Path finder pilot would explore how far one can model a very sophisticated product with very complex cold and hot section physics requiring simulations at high levels of fidelity Product mature but pilot will try implementing MBE with today’s tools Electronic Warfare Systems Navy (ONR and PM JCREW) Closely aligned system upgrade spirals make this a good domain for both MBE and PBE. Focus is on Virtual design and modeling, with particular emphasis on electromagnetic compatibility with the battlefield system of systems; Open architectures; and, Rapid manufacturing services and trusted supply chains. TRL 7+ for applying concepts to current EW product lines. Less mature for emerging agile multi-function RF systems Space Systems Aerospace Corporation Closely aligned Also interested in PBE and ways to reconfigure composable components in Concept Design Center has supported over 100 space system engineering efforts Description of Potential Pilot(s) for Innovative PBE Approaches Our vision of Platform-Based Engineering comprises Adaptive Product Line Architectures, Agility Platforms, and Architectural Patterns. These three “game-changers” represent distinct but complementary efforts. Depending on sponsor interest and funding level, any or all can be pursued. Specific pilots (also called out in Table 11) currently under evaluation are:
Table . Proposed COD Pilot Projects Proposed Pilot Owner Level of Engagement Description Maturity Mobilization of Social Networks for Protection Closely aligned Building on the DARPA Network (“Red Balloon”) Challenge, show capability for incident location and reporting. Successful demonstration in CONUS Reconfigurable/Adaptable UAV Capabilities for Missions Rapid Reaction Technology Office (RRTO) Closely Aligned Use pre-defined UAV capabilities/services in unanticipated circumstances. Systems analysis on MOEs has limited success. Embedded Sensors & Computing and/or Autonomic Computing USAF F-35 Autonomic Logistics Information System (ALIS) IOC under development Detect needs for maintenance during flight, notify maintenance center to have fixes ready when aircraft lands Well under development; further supply chain extension opportunities Space Systems Aerospace Corp. Closely aligned for self-adaptive space mission performance adjustment, V&V of systems Extensive work in autonomic satellite anomaly detection Description of Potential Pilot(s) for Innovative TSD Approaches Potential pilots for innovative TSD approaches are under discussion. They often involve security-level considerations.
Old Business – TAB 9 Committee Reports (limit to 5-minute presentations) Finance Committee – Mr. George Vakalis, Chairperson Work Plan Committee – Ms. Merry Carlson, Chairperson Interoperable Communications Committee – Mr. John Rockwell, Chairperson Citizen Corps Committee – Ms. Jade Gamble, Kenai Peninsula Borough All-Hazards Plan Review Committee – Mr. Richard Hildreth, Acting Chairperson Training Committee – Ms. Michelle Torres, Acting Chairperson Disaster Search and Rescue Committee – Mr. Mark Roberts Statewide Mutual Aid Compact – Mr. Bryan Fisher, Acting Chairperson New Business – TAB 10 FirstNet update, Mr. John Rockwell, Department of Public Safety, and Mr. Kevin McGinnis, National Association of State EMS Officials (15 minutes) Status of dams in Alaska, Mr. Charlie Cobb, Technical Engineer, Department of Natural Resources (15 minutes) Cyber security, Mat-Su Lessons Learned, Mr. Casey Cook, Mat-Su LEPC (15 minutes) Update and approval of the Tier II public access procedure and the Tier II form (site plans) update; Ms. Kathy Shea, SPAR (5 minutes) Update and approval of SERC Policy and Procedures Manual 2018; Mr. Reeve, DHS&EM (5 minutes) Other State Agency and Ex-Officio Reports – TAB 11 (Reports by exception only) Informational Items (read only/refer to packet) – TAB 12 SERC Policies and Procedures Manual 2018 (Includes Ethics Information for Members of Boards and Commissions) SERC Bylaws Jurisdictions receiving FY2018 State Homeland Security Program funds SERC Tier II Form update, and Public Information Release Policy Public Comment – Five (5) minutes per speaker – TAB 13 Commission Member Closing Comments and Adjournment – TAB 14 Reserved for Future Use – TAB 15 Next meeting: Friday, May 3, 2019 Anchorage
SERC Activities Age “Connections” Program Activities (and associated SERC research lab that is discussed) Time Required Group Size Cost All Ages SERC Science Talk Multiple labs 1 hour Up to 40 $18/participant or $300 minimum 8-Adult Guided Hike Multiple labs 1.5 Up to 20 $18/participant or $300 minimum 6-Adult Excursion Multiple Labs 3 hours Up to 22 $20/adults, $15/child (12 or younger) or $300 minimum 9 to Adult Shoreline Connections (formerly Estuary Chesapeake) Plankton (Plankton Ecology Lab) 1 program=1 hr 2 programs= 2 hrs 3 programs=2.5 hrs 4 programs= 3 hrs Up to 20 per activity; max group size 60 for multiple stations 1-2 Activities= $18/person or $300 minimum 3-4 Activities = $22/person or $375 minimum Oysters (Marine and Estuarine Ecology Lab) Seining (Fish and Invertebrate Lab) Water Sheds and Water Testing (Nutrient Lab) Engineering a Blue Crab Introduction to Blue Crab Anatomy, Hydraulics, and Pneumatics (Fish and Invertebrate Lab) & Build a Blue Crab Hydraulic Arm 3 hours Up to 25 $18/participant or $375 minimum, cost includes materials fees 5-8 yrs. Exploring Nature Connections Seining (Fish and Invertebrate Lab) 1 program=1 hr 2 programs= 2 hrs 3 programs=2.5 hrs 4 programs= 3 hrs Up to 20 per activity; max size 60 for multiple stations 1-2 Activities= $18/person or $300 minimum 3-4 Activities = $22/person or $375 minimum Blue Crabs (Fish and Invertebrate Lab) Understanding Oysters (Marine Ecology Lab) Jellyfish (Marine Ecology Lab) Sharks (Fish and Invertebrate Lab)
Forest Land in Ha. 610.15 313.44 106.85 398.30 63.17 32.80 117.20 Well 2.02 1.72 1.70 2.02 0 1.45 1.61 Irrigated Area 13.68 6.02 6.55 8.84 1.51 21.52 6.51 Unirrigated Area 575.02 95.60 223.83 144.06 87.65 34.97 48.12 Culturable waste land 84.57 8.65 4.61 8.38 2.97 4.04 80.06 Uncultivable area 0 41.85 29.20 25.22 4.51 32.81 73.40 Others 5.54 4.30 4.85 6.82 1.51 9.31 3.29 Methodology for preparation of DPR: Sr. No Method Activities 1 Understanding District Latehar & blocks of concerning districts and allocated Panchayat. Review of Government records Discussions with officers Review of reference material Study of present status of various development schemes 2 Finalizing the procedure to prepare the perspective plan Discussion with Deputy Collector Discussion with DDC Discussion with District MNREGA Nodal Officer
Sl No Year Average Monthly Rain fall(in mm) Average Annual rainfall (in mm) in previous 5 years T Temperature (°C) Average Annual run off (mm/year) Max Min 1 2008 110.61 442.45 38 16 367012 2 2009 132.3 661.5 36 18 548714 3 2010 129.88 649.4 36 17 538677 4 2011 295.06 1475.32 34 16 1223778 5 2012 159.88 1220.32 37 15 1012239 Drinking Water availability details: S.No Item Units Quantity Source 1 Drinking water requirement 2,18,280 ltr./day 2 Present availability of drinking water 1,80,960 3 No. of drinking water sources available 60 a) Functional 48 b) Need Repairing 8 c) Defunct 4 4 Short fall if any 37,320 Ltrs/day 5 No. of families getting drinking water from outside the Micro Project area area Nos 6 Requirement of new drinking water sources (if any) 20 Availability of drinking water: Main sources of drinking water in the village are Hand pumps and wells at certain location. In some of the wells availability is round the year and hand pumps provide
MSU Office of the President Speaking Engagement Request Form Thank you for contacting the Office of the President. This form is used to request a speaking engagement for John Engler, Interim President of Michigan State University. We receive a steady stream of speaking engagement requests. In order to better understand and prepare for each one, we ask that you provide the following information: *Required Field Event Name: *Event Date: Type of remarks requested (check one): WELCOME REMARKS SPEECH PANEL *Event start time: Event end time: Program start time: Time of remarks: *Length of remarks: (Note: We may not always be able to accommodate your requested “length” of remarks) Printed Program? YES NO Publication date: *If available attach detailed AGENDA or provide once completed. *Location and Room# if applicable: *Sponsoring organization: *Contact person and *Who will President Engler and where e.g. front of building or outside of room, etc. *Office phone: *Cell phone (for day of event): *Email address: *Detailed Description of event and detailed expectation of President Engler’s participation: Anticipated number in audience: *Description of audience: Press or electronic media in attendance? YES NO *Outline of suggested talking points/topic (include a separate document if necessary): President to be introduced by: Other speakers (if any) and order of appearance: What technical support will be available? Will remarks be recorded? (Please indicate format) AUDIOTAPE VIDEOTAPE OTHER (specify): Additional information: Please provide copies of any schedule/agenda for the event, any prepared script for President Engler and/or other speakers and any additional background information that might be useful. Please return this completed form to Lori Blankenship at: , or fax to 517.432.0200.
East Regional Health Authority APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT Instructions: Answer all questions and completely. Applications must be completed in duplicate. Any false statement on this form will result in rejection of your application; Any false statement discovered subsequent to employment/appointment will be cause for dismissal. 1. Name In Full (Last) (First) (Middle) 2a. Present Address 2b. Telephone 2c. NIS No: TRN: 2.d Email address: 3. Date of Birth (Month, Day, Year) 4. Place of Birth (City, Country) 5. Sex Male Female 6. Marital Status Single Divorced Married Separated Widowed 7. Dependents Number: Age(s): 8a. Contact person (in case of emergency) Relation: 8b. Address and Tel. No. 9. EDUCATION Names & locations of Educational Institutions Attended: Dates: From To Certification Acquired 10. List three responsible persons not related to you who are qualified to supply definite information regarding your character and ability: NAME ADDRESS IN FULL OCCUPATION 11. Employment: Describe positions you have held since you first began working. Start with present position and work back to the first position which you held. Account for all periods of unemployment. Use continuation sheet if necessary. If currently employed, may we approach your present employer? Yes No (a) Dates of Employment (Month, Year) Position held Salary or Earnings per annum Starting: Final: Name, Address & Tel. # of Employer: Summary of Duties:
If employer details are not on the system do we follow the current procedure of emailing the employer form to NTP hub? No, employer details are added in two separate areas – Work Experience Employer Details and Employer Details on an outcome/sustained outcome claim. When entering Work Experience Employer Details, Training Providers are required to add the new company in FIPS, the new company details will then be checked and verified by the NTP hub. A training video detailing how to add new Work Experience Employer Details is available to show this process. What if an employer doesn't have an email address? Do they need to create one before we are able to add them to the system? Yes. This is a mandatory field. Your section showing Male/Female what if someone doesn't identify as either of the above? At present, SDS only report on male / female for EF, however we are currently reviewing all equality categories and will ensure that changes made meet evolving best practice advice for future recording. Training history – will we be able to view this prior to adding start to FIPS Yes, you will be able to view payment and participant history at the Individual Search stage in FIPS. What do you do if the address is not in the Postcode Database (both individual and employer)? Please contact the helpdesk in these rare instances. For length unemployed, is there a school leaver option or should I choose the first option? There is no school leaver option, however once an individual leaves school and does not go into employment straight away then they would fall into the 0-12 weeks category. What do I input if SCQF level is unknown? Enter lowest level but update as soon as information becomes available. What is the SOC referring to in the registration form? After you've updated a field & forget to save, the button is so insignificant, will you get a warning message to remind you to click save? Yes, a warning message appears and additionally FIPS automatically saves every 30 seconds. Email is mandatory field, what happens if the individual or employer does not have an email address? For an individual, they can select SMS as their preferred method of contact. Employers must have an email address therefore would be required to set up. Is it acceptable for one person to cascade the training of FIPS to other colleagues using the training videos so that they can gain their FIPS log in details? Yes Claims Questions Answers
—————- Babylon v6 Che Guevara QZDSEBF94P3K5AUVS8NC6T Rochelle Kessler X9TKT2UWV66SZ4W2R8WK7588MPT —————- Babylon Pro v6.0.1.36 1. uninstall previous version then delete babylon folder. 2. reboot 3.during installation use this User Name: ieccorp License Code: 9MGGMD72WVV3RFJER94XWVHYT 4.apply the patch supplied et voila!!! important: Don’t run the application before completing above instructions —————- Bitdefender Internet Security 2008 A4204-24248-0DD31-3FAC7 44EE6-1A5EA-D6820-2247B E51B4-6F28B-F5F02-8CD2D
Microsoft Windows 3.11 WorkGroup…………………………..\WIN311WG\Setup.exe Microsoft Windows CDKEY : 35695-OEM-0008411-93110 Microsoft Windows 97 (Windows 95 CDKEY : 15996-OEM-0012641-04046 Microsoft Windows 98……………………………………..\WIN98\Setup.exe CDKEY : K4HVD-Q9TJ9-6CRX9-C9G68-RQ2D3 SN : Win2000 -> RM233-2PRQQ-FR4RH-JP89H-46QYB Serial Number : Win XP——————–> Acad 14–__—————> 117-99703105 ; cdkey : W36H ; AU-Code: C3DF32EA Acad 2000—————–> 112-1111111 ; AU-Code: 5X8NUG Back Office (Server) —-> 419-0012065 Corel 10 —————–> D10NR-3284253T76 Office 97 (Profesional)—> 4156-0287065 Office 98 —————-> 1234-1979797 Office XP —————-> FM9FY-TMF7Q-KCKCT-V9T29-TBBBG PhotoShop 60 ————-> PWW400R7106337-339 Win 2000 —————–> RM233-2PRQQ-FR4RH-JP89H-46QYB Win 97 ——————-> 0100 – 0123456 – 00100 Win 98 ——————-> K4HVD-Q9TJ9-6CRX9-C9G68-RQ2D3 Win 98 ——————-> HG9W3-UPW3T-XGG7W-4X9HK-GKRMT
AERONAUTICS – North Aviation Week & Space Technology Flying ARCHITECTURE (for additional titles see Building & Construction) – North Architectural Digest Architectural Record Custom Home North Carolina Architecture Carolina Architecture/AIA Annual Directory AUTOMOTIVE – North Commercial Carrier Journal (CCJ) BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION (for additional titles see Architecture) – North Fine Homebuilding Journal of Construction BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS - North Business: North Carolina Business Week Economist Fortune Kiplinger’s Personal Finance Sales & Marketing Management COMPUTERS and ELECTRONICS – North Make Mathematics & Computer Education Wired COSMETOLOGY (Beauty and Cosmetics) – North Hair Modern Salon Nailpro EARTH SCIENCES (for additional titles see Environmental Issues) – North Discover National Geographic ENGINEERING – North ENR: Engineering News Record Home Power Trial
4 5 Hot Pockets 6 Toasted cheese & tomato soup 7 Hamburgers & Fries 8 pasta 11 Pizza 12 Chicken oriental veg rice 13 Chili cheese fries 14 Burritos Mexi casserole 15 Brunch 18 Chicken Nuggets Fries 19 Fajita Refried beans 20 Tuna Or Salmon salad 21 Oven baked burrito 22 Pasta 24 Corn Dogs 25 Toasted Cheese & tomato soup 26 Burger 27 & corn bread 28 Pot pies Sept Lunch menu subject to change without notice WE ARE AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY PROVIDER In accordance with federal law and U. S Department of Agriculture, this institution is prohibited from discrimination on basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age or disability Available Daily: Full Salad Bar, Breads, Bagels, English Muffins, Wraps, Low- fat yogurt, Fresh, dried & canned fruit, peanut butter, individual cheeses, nuts, fresh brewed ice tea, 1 % & low fat regular and choc milk, (soy milk provided with medical statement).
Geometric series: formula for the nth term and the sum of n terms. The following proof of the geometric series partial sum formula uses only sigma notation and simultaneous equations (many use the difference of two powers which is not studied in Mathematics (2U)) . Limiting sum of geometric series when The limiting sum formula should be derived from the partial geometric sum formula and the knowledge of limits approaching zero. The case ofshould be discussed using the word convergent – to show it converges on a single number. The specific case of changing recurring decimals to fractions should be explored here, however students should decide whether the limiting sum formula method or the simultaneous method is the best for them. The 2 other cases ofand should be discussed with the word divergent being used for that type of series. Applications to annuities and repayments. The use of spreadsheets designed to show how the balance decreases depending on the interest, repayment amount or repayment time will give students confidence in estimation of time frames. Bank simulations can be found at or There are only a few variants of this type of question that have been asked in previous HSC and the questions are often of a high mark value. Recent examples of these questions are: Q16b Q13d Q15c Common problems from the Marker’s notes include: incorrect number of instalments e.g. 2 (years) instead of 24 (months), rounding too soon, and using incorrect starting balance.
Series X3 QLD 2018 Club Championship Points Score COMPETITOR R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 TOTAL 1 Brock Giblin 94 94 2 Frank Mammarella 61 61 3 Chris Donnelly 53 53 4 Mark Goldspink 45 45 5 Greg Hartnett 41 41 6 Matthew Wells 39 39 7 Troy Perrins 37 37 8 Kaden Olsen 37 37 9 Ross Street 36 36 10 Richard Peasey 36 36 11 Zak Hudson 36 36 12 Matthew Broadbent 34 34 13 Mark Pryor 32 32 14 Seiton Conner Young 24 24 15 Brad Smith 18 18 16 Brayden Slater 18 18 17 David Halstead 15 15 18 Sean Beggs 13 13 19 Kaleb Mustow 12 12 20 Gary Goulding 12 12 21 Bayley Hall 7 7 22 Anthony Walsh 5 5 23 Warren King 4 4 24 Alfonso Senese 3 3 25 Mark Lamberth 0 0 26 David Wood 0 0 27 28 29
ملاحظات: توصيل المضخات على التوازي فإن قيمة Q تزداد. لرؤية ذلك عمليا، يجب أن تكون قيمة التدفق التي نقارن عندها عالية (أي أن outlet valve fully opened) حتى يكون الفرق بين flow لمضخة واحدة و لمضختين على التوازي واضح، كما بالشكل المجاور. Figure 7 Low Flow High Flow فقاعات الهواء التي تسبب cavitation عند إغلاق inlet valve تدريجيا في تجربة 10 أوضح منه في تجربة 9.
EXHIBIT A SCHEDULE OF INVESTORS Initial Closing Investors Investor Number of Series AA Shares Purchase [name of Investor] ________ $________ [address] [facsimile number] [email address] [Add Subsequent Closing(s), as appropriate]
I did it! I've always wanted to my own amplifier, and now, finally, I made one. It's my first "serious audio" project ever. Starting this project was daunting to me. There was a gap between buying the parts and actually making the amplifier... a two year gap, as a matter of fact. I know a thing or two about analog electronics and I can read and understand electronic diagrams, but I never made something from scratch that connects directly to a wall outlet. And I usually make stuff with electronics either for kids or as a "proof of concept", where accuracy and details matter only little. In other words, I was just insecure about me as a maker of Serious Amplifiers. What helped me to get started is that I just needed an amplifier. I love to play music and the best sound system I had was my iMac. And that proved not good enough for me. So I had the choice between buying a cheap receiver while knowing I had all the parts for a much better amp or just get started building it. Oh boy, I am SO glad I did just that! If you find yourself dreaming about building an amplifier now and then, but are not sure about how to get it done: Read on! I described the making of my Serious Amp as good as possible, including the mistakes and successes. The result is not a Perfect Amp, but it surely is a Serious One that is not that hard to build even if you never built one before. -- If you like this project, please vote for it in the contests. Thanks! -- This amplifier is the best one I've ever owned (that claim isn't worth very much) and I'm really, really happy with it. Even with my secondhand (€10,-) loudspeakers it sounds pretty nice. In the video, the sound is recorded with the on-camera mic. What you hear is far, far away from the real life experience. The amp is a so called Gainclone, using one LM3886 op-amp per channel. The power supply is based on a (way too large) 230VA toroid transformer. It took me about 32 hours to build the amp and power supply. In this Instructable, I'll describe how I made the power supply and amplifier. More important, I'll also describe what I would do different if I had to do the project again.
MONITORING COMPLIANCE This document will be monitored to ensure it is effective and to assurance compliance. Minimum requirement to be monitored Lead Tool Frequency of Report of Compliance Reporting arrangements Lead(s) for acting on Recommendations 95% of serious incidents are reported in accordance with this policy Internal Audit Internal Audit and Report Annually Policy audit report to: Committee Risk Assurance Committee Head of Risk Management 100% of relevant serious incidents will be appropriately reported to external agencies Head of Risk Management Audit of 20 incident forms Annually Policy audit report to: SIRG Head of Risk Management Policy audit report to:
Achievement Unlocked: Survived the Tutorial Achievement Unlocked: Survived the Tutorial Achievement Unlocked: Survived the Tutorial Achievement Unlocked: Crushed a Resource! Achievement Unlocked: Crushed a Resource! Achievement Unlocked: Crushed a Resource! Achievement Unlocked: Crushed a Resource! Achievement Unlocked: Crushed a Resource!
Section 4 – Duty of Candour Page 8 Section 5 – Types of review Page 8 Section 6 – Critical Incident Reviews – guiding principles Page 9 Section 7 – The CIR process and flowchart Page 10 Section 8 – Support for the reviewing process Page 14 Section 9 – Joint agency reviews Page 14 Section 10 – Multi-agency reviews and SARs Page 14 Section 11 – Gaining and embedding the learning Page 15 Section 12 – De-briefing Service Page 16 Section 13 – Parallel Process and statutory reviews Page 17 Appendix A – Immediate Action a Critical Incident Page 20 Appendix B – Critical Incident Review template Page 21 Appendix C – CIR Action Plan format Page 22 Appendix D – Other types of reviews for serious incidents Page 22 PURPOSE This procedure sets out the governance framework for reporting incidents of harm that occur to service users and staff members. It also provides guidance on the processes of reporting, managing, reviewing and learning from the most serious incidents.
No Yes: Please explain how and append appropriate documents: Note: If the consent requires revisions, no new participants may be enrolled until the revised consent form has been approved. Have you complied with all applicable reporting requirements? (e.g., of the Sponsor and/or FDA) Yes No Not applicable Status of research activities. Please check all that apply: No change in research activities All research activities have been temporarily and voluntarily stopped for all subjects Partial voluntary hold on some research activities for all subjects (please detail below) Voluntary hold on new subject enrollment only Corrective action plan, including plan to prevent recurrence, if applicable: By submitting this form the Principal Investigator certifies that: All necessary information has been assessed and is completed in sufficient detail to facilitate IRB review. The risks of the research are minimized to the greatest extent possible. The risk-benefit relationship of the research continues to be acceptable. The consent form does not require revision. The consent form requires revision. A tracked changes copy and a clean copy of the revised consent are attached. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
When reporting dates use dd/mmm/yy Submit SAE reports to: _______________________________________ Participant details Participant initials: Male Female Initial report Follow-up report Date of this report: Date of or age at time of event Weight at time of event (if known): _______kg Date PI notified of Investigator details Investigator name: _______________________________________ Phone #:_________________________________ Study Site Address: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Investigational product(s) Name (indicate if unblended or not) Batch number Dose & frequency Start date/time Stop date/time (or ongoing) Indication for use Causality assessment * Causality: 1=Definite, 2=Probable, 3=Possible, 4=Unlikely, 5=Unknown Concomitant medicines/treatments at time of event, i.e. not to treat event (or attach copy of relevant case record form)
Proposed Suspension When the State agency proposes to suspend an institution’s participation, including Program payments for the submission of a false or fraudulent claim, the institution and RP/Is must be notified in writing. The notice must state: The serious deficiencies found; That the State agency is proposing to suspend the institution’s and RP/Is’ Program participation, including the payment of claims; That the State agency is proposing to terminate and disqualify the institution and RP/Is; The effective date of the suspension (this cannot be earlier than 10 days after the institution receives the notice); That the institution can appeal the proposed suspension and the proposed termination and disqualification (these are two separate actions); The contact information for the suspension review official; That a suspension review must be requested within 10 days of receipt of the notice; That if the hearing official overturns the proposed suspension, the institution may claim reimbursement for eligible meals served during the proposed suspension; That termination from the Program will result in placement of the institution and RP/Is on the NDL; and That the institution’s voluntary termination of its agreement with the agency after having received the notice will still result in the institution and RP/Is formal termination by the State agency and placement on the NDL. Include the State agency’s appeal procedures for suspensions and terminations. If the State agency chooses not to suspend an institution’s participation for submitting a false or fraudulent claim, it must immediately issue a notice proposing to terminate and disqualify the institution following the procedures outlined in Part 1 of this guidance and 7 CFR 226.6(c)(3). Suspension Review – Suspension Appeal What is the difference between a “suspension review” and an “abbreviated appeal”? A suspension review is an abbreviated appeal that is available to institutions before a suspension for submission of false or fraudulent claims takes effect. It consists of a review of written documents, instead of an in-person hearing, to determine whether Program payments will continue. It does not resolve any appeal option that the institution may request of the State agency’s proposed termination and disqualification of the institution; the institution may request a regular appeal if they are dissatisfied with the result of the suspension appeal.