Revisions July 2016 This revision dated July, 2016 incorporates a number of changes reflecting the Procurement Regulations for IPF Borrowers, July 2016 (“Procurement Regulations”). This SPD updates the “Sample bidding documents for Procurement of Non-Consulting Services.” April, 2007. This Standard Procurement Document (SPD) is applicable to procurement of Non-Consulting Services funded by IBRD or IDA financed projects whose Legal Agreements make reference to the Procurement Regulations. April 2007 The features of May 2004, revised October 2006, Procurement Guidelines have been incorporated. December 2002 The Sample bidding documents in this publication have been prepared for use by Borrowers in the procurement of Services by International Competitive Bidding (ICB). These documents may also be adapted to National Competitive Bidding (NCB) with some changes generally necessary in the Instructions to Bidders and the Conditions of Contract.
convertible currency]. The method of payment will be [insert method of payment]. The document will be sent by [insert delivery procedure]. 6. Bids must be delivered to the address below [state address at the end of this RFB] on or before [insert time and date]. Electronic Bidding will [will not] be permitted. Late Bids will be rejected. Bids will be publicly opened in the presence of the Bidders’ designated representatives and anyone who chooses to attend at the address below [state address at the end of this RFB] on [insert time and date]. 7. All Bids must be accompanied by a [insert “Bid Security” or “Bid-Securing Declaration,” as appropriate] of [insert amount and currency in case of a Bid Security]. 8. The address(es) referred to above is (are): [insert detailed address(es)] [Insert name of office] [Insert name of officer and [Insert postal address and/or street address, postal code, city and country] [Insert telephone number, country and city codes] [Insert facsimile number, country and city [Insert address] [Insert web site address]
lowest evaluated cost of the lot (contract) combinations, including any discounts offered in the Letter of Bid, is specified in Section III, Evaluation and Qualification Criteria. Comparison of Bids The Employer compare the evaluated costs of all substantially responsive Bids established in accordance with ITB 35.2 to determine the Bid that has the lowest evaluated cost. Abnormally Low Bids An Abnormally Low Bid is one where the Bid price, in combination with other constituent elements of the Bid, appears unreasonably low to the extent that the Bid price raises material concerns as to the capability of the Bidder to perform the Contract for the offered Bid price. In the event of identification of a potentially Abnormally Low Bid, the Employer shall seek written clarifications from the Bidder, including detailed price analyses of its Bid price in relation to the subject matter of the contract, scope, proposed methodology, schedule, allocation of risks and responsibilities and any other requirements of the bidding document. evaluation of the price analyses, in the event that the Employer determines that the Bidder has failed to demonstrate its capability to perform the Contract for the offered Bid Price, the Employer shall reject the Bid. Qualification of the Bidder The Employer shall determine to its satisfaction whether the Bidder that is selected as having submitted the lowest evaluated cost and substantially responsive Bid is eligible and meets the qualifying criteria specified in Section III, Evaluation and Qualification Criteria. The determination shall be based upon an examination of the documentary evidence of the Bidder’s qualifications submitted by the Bidder, pursuant to ITB 18. The determination shall not take into consideration the qualifications of other firms such as the Bidder’s subsidiaries, parent entities, affiliates, subcontractors or any other firm(s) different from the Bidder that submitted the Bid. An affirmative determination shall be a prerequisite for award of the Contract to the Bidder. A negative determination shall result in disqualification of the Bid, in which event the Employer shall proceed to the Bidder who offers a substantially responsive Bid with the next lowest evaluated cost to make a similar determination of that Bidder’s qualifications to perform satisfactorily.
Section IX - Special Conditions of Contract Number of GC Clause Amendments of, and Supplements to, Clauses in the General Conditions of Contract 1.1 The words “in the Government’s country” are amended to read “in [name of country].” 1.1(a) The Adjudicator is ____________________ 1.1(e) The contract name is ____________________. 1.1(h) The Employer is ____________________ 1.1(m) The Member in Charge is ____________________ 1.1(p) The Service Provider is ____________________ 1.2 The Applicable Law is: ____________________ 1.3 The language is ____________________ 1.4 The addresses are: Employer: Attention: Telex: Facsimile: Service Provider: Attention: Telex: Facsimile: 1.6 The Authorized Representatives are: For the Employer: For the Service Provider: 2.1 The date on which this Contract shall come into effect is _______________. 2.2.2 The Starting Date for the commencement of Services is ________________. 2.3 The Intended Completion Date is ____________________.
Performance Incentive Compensation Appendix Chart 1 Performance Incentive Obligations Year [1] Services Criterion Values Ref. Performance Criterion Units Weight Excellent 5 Very Good 4 Good 3 Fair 2 Poor 1 [Development of Plans and Programs1 ] Quality and Timeliness [0 45] Completed on time with no need for revision to the substance of the document N/A N/A Completed on time but requires revision to the substance of the document N/A [Energy Management] % reduction of kilowatt hours of electricity per unit produced from Base Year [0.25] 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 [Computerized Billing and Collection System] number of days after the Starting Date until the computerized billing and collection system is in place [0.30] 140 150 160 170 180 [Note: The is a sample only.] (1) In respect of the and Programs each plan or program listed in Section [] shall be given a score of either 5 (Excellent), 2 (Fair) or (0) and the average score for all plans and programs shall be multiplied by the Criteria Weight. The average score shall be rounded to the nearest .5 decimal.