List of information and communication activities during the implementation. Table 3: List of information and communication activities during the implementation Activities When Stakeholders Objective(s) table discussion 2009 August Majors of villages, Representative of Plant First initiative of the Power Plant to collaborate Bilateral meeting 2009 October Major of Abasár, Representative of Power Plant Identification of the common interest and strategy to involve the partners Round table discussion 2010 February Majors of villages, Representative of Power Plant, Representative of Egererdő Co., Representative of Róbert Brainstorming and preparation of the frame of collaboration
Meeting July, 2009 UCASUL RuralE.Evolution project presentation table September, 2009 UCASUL and Alvito’s municipality RuralE.Evolution project presentation Meeting April, 2010 UCASUL Discussion of the main advantages and constraints of the project’s implementation Local initiative April, 2010 UCASUL, organizations of farmers and Agricultural Cooperative Banks in the region RuralE.evolution presentation, including its background, objectives, what has been done, advantages and constraints and the next steps of the project. Open ground to discuss the interest of the stakeholders on the project, as well as their view and role on the project Round table June, 2010 Alvito’s mayor and UCASUL RuralE.Evolution project presentation, including the role that the municipality can have – its duties and benefits as a partner in the project Local initiative June, 2010 Alvito’s municipality, UCASUL, Minister of Agriculture, Farmer’s organizations, RuralE.Evolution project presentation, identifying the main advantages and constraints.
the decision of actors related to implementation of their PPP scheme? Ranking the commitment of the key actors to implement the PPP scheme 1.Farmers' organisation, 2.Farmers, private companies 3.Local authorities, 4.Other SME-s 1. Local authority 2. Private company 3. State owned company 4.Farmers 1.Farmers, Farmers' organisation,local authorities 2.Banks 3.Other SME-s, investors, private companies 1.Farmers' organisation 2.Local authorities 3. Banks, other private partner 1. Regional government, investor, private company 2.Farmers' organisation, local authority 3.Farmers, other SME-s 5. Banks Main motivations of the implementation better utilisation of biomass, alternative income of farmers, sufficient profit to investor, decreasing of the external energy dependency, environmental benefit, long- term benefits from investment better utilisation of biomass, alternative income of farmers, environmental benefit, creating jobs better utilisation of biomass, alternative income of farmers, sufficient profit to investor, decreasing of the external energy dependency, environmental benefit, long- term benefits from investment, profitable banking placement better utilisation of biomass, alternative income of farmers, sufficient profit to investor, environmental benefit, creating jobs and increasing local economy sufficient profit to investor, environmental benefit Which type of risks arising till this time related to the implementation ? unbalanced amongst partners,economic circumstances, legal frame, political situation, administrative governmental incentitives lack of safe biomass, unbalanced risks amongst partners, political situation Unbalanced risks amongst partners, changing the motivation of partners, economic circumstances, governmental incentitives Economic circumstances, frame, political situation, access to capital, difficulties to link to electric grid lack of safe biomass,legal frame, political situation Is a clear common vision of partners to establish a management structure to the implementation yes yes yes no yes