Testing 3 months Cognitive testing 1 hour PO 20/30 persons from the surveyed population from one humanitarian actor in each country (1 day in total) Focus Group Discussion 30 mins PO A representative sample of 5-10 persons from the surveyed population for each humanitarian actor Capacity building 4 months Group Discussion 30 mins PO 5 enumerators per training session for each humanitarian actor Evaluation Form / Online survey 5 mins All participants to the training for all humanitarian actors Data Collection 8 months Routine data collection 8 months Enumerators All humanitarian actors with HI support Participatory Observation ½ day (pre and post review) PO Enumerators administering the WG questions for all humanitarian actors Follow-up survey TBC 1day (pre and post review) PO Sample of persons from the surveyed population with no disabilities for all humanitarian actors
Exit Questionnaire 10 mins (pre and post review) PO Sample of 25 persons from the surveyed population just interviewed for all humanitarian actors Focus Group Discussion 30 mins (pre and post review) PO 5 Enumerators for each humanitarian actors 2 hours (pre and post review) PO All humanitarian actors Review Throughout Key Informant Interview 30 mins PO At least one participant per organisation for all humanitarian actors Same than the first KII Evaluation 2 months Barrier Analysis 1 day PO All humanitarian actors Surveyed population feedback ½ day PO Representative sample of persons from the surveyed population of all humanitarian actors identified by the WG Quantitative survey TBC Enumerators For each organisation to decide Key Informant Interview 30 mins PO At one participant per organisation for all humanitarian actors (same as previously) 4-5-4- Data treatment The data collected as part of the action-research can be separated in different categories:
Contribute to the systematic collection and use of Washington Group questions by humanitarian actors to improve access, effectiveness and impartiality of humanitarian response # of humanitarian actors using the WG questions to disaggregate their programme data by disability Achieved Source Humanitarian datasets, survey of humanitarian actors # of humanitarian responses where data on disability is being reported as part of the reporting/cluster mechanisms Planned 0 0 0 1 Achieved Source Humanitarian datasets, grey literature and published humanitarian reports / final project report OUTCOME Outcome Indicators Baseline Milestone 1 Milestone 2 Target Assumptions Evidence generated will ensure key humanitarian actors have % of staff from humanitarian actors (disaggregated by gender, age and Planned 0 0 0 75% Key with Achieved Source Surveys, e-learning and sensitisation sessions reports / final report
the knowledge, skills and tools to count and plan for people with disabilities in humanitarian organisation) trained or accessing the guidance or reporting increased awareness on the WG questions and improving quality and standards in humanitarian programming Number of humanitarian actors and donor committing to disaggregate data by disability using the WG questions Planned 0 0 20 Achieved Source Surveys, e-learning and sensitisation sessions reports / report OUTPUT Output Indicators Baseline Milestone 1 Milestone 2 Target Assumption An action research is carried out to test and assess the use of the WG questions in humanitarian action. # of organisations participating in field testing in each of the 3 countries (disaggregated by sector and type) Planned 0 3 6 10 3 are on and of Achieved Source Training report % of from humanitarian actors reporting Planned 0 25% 50% 75% Achieved Source
a positive level of acceptability of the WG questions in the three pilot location during the FGD / KII / Survey # of people with disabilities (disaggregated by sex and age) identified using the WG questions in each of the 3 countries Planned Achieved Source Datasets, factsheets, dashboards, synthesis report Number of reports produced with outcome and lesson learnt at Planned 0 3 6 9 Achieved Source DFID Report
OUTPUT 3 Output Indicator 3 Baseline Milestone 1 Milestone 2 Target Assumption Learning from the pilots are disseminated to key humanitarian actors in internal events and promote the collection of data on persons with disabilities using the WGSS Number of steering committee meeting held Planned 0 3 6 9 - Humanitarian agencies dedicate time and resources to promote the WG questions as a data collection tool that will improve their impartiality and efficiency. Achieved Source Meeting minutes Number of events held to disseminate learning Planned 0 2 2 4 Achieved Source Webinar, conferences Number of organisations attending dissemination learning events organised Planned 0 0 20 30 Achieved Source Events attendance # organisations hosting the guidance, webinar and/or dissemination materials in their websites and in their induction processes Planned 0 0 0 5 Achieved Source Project reports / website links