zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
New South Wales Figure C1 – Delta Electricity (Vales Point) closing bid prices, dispatch and spot price Figure C2 – Snowy Hydro (Colongra, Tumut, Upper Tumut, Guthega, Blowering) closing bid prices, dispatch and spot price Queensland Figure C3 – Alinta Energy (Braemar A) closing bid prices, dispatch and spot price Figure C4 – Callide Power Trading (Callide C) closing bid prices, dispatch and spot price Figure C5 – CS Energy (Callide B, Gladstone, Kogan Creek, Wivenhoe) closing bid prices, dispatch and spot price Figure C6 – Millmerran Energy Trader (Millmerran) closing bid prices, dispatch and spot price Figure C7 – Stanwell Corporation (Barron Gorge, Kareeya, Mackay,
to include the Fama-French size (SMB) and value (HML) factors as well as the Carhart momentum factor (MOM). The models are estimated separately including and excluding three stock characteristics: inverse price, turnover calculated as the sum of trading volume over the last ten trading days divided by shares outstanding, and volatility is calculated as the square root of mean squared returns over the prior ten trading days. Panel A: Index Return Accuracy Correlation Coefficient Equality of Means Model Pre Post Pre Post 3 Return Factor Model 0.9274 0.9340 0.37 0.47 3 Return Factor Model with 3 Stock Characteristic Factors 0.9306 0.9335 0.08 0.09 6 Return Factor Model 0.9824 0.9640 0.19 0.06 6 Return Factor Model with 3 Stock Characteristic Factors 0.9829 0.9606 0.37 0.32 (continued) Panel B: Factor Return Accuracy Correlation Coefficients Model ExMkt HML SMB MOM BAN TARP Pre Period (N=254) 3 Return Factor Model 0.9716 0.9255 0.9075 3 Return Factor Model with 3 Stock Characteristic Factors 0.9738 0.9247 0.9038 6 Return Factor Model 0.9789 0.9164 0.9013 0.9519 0.9773 0.9688 6 Return Factor Model with 3 Stock Characteristic Factors 0.9819 0.9171 0.8859 0.9502 0.9778 0.9664 Post Period (N=58) 3 Return Factor Model 0.8970 0.8434 0.7542 3 Return Factor Model with 3 Stock Characteristic Factors 0.8767 0.8190 0.6948 6 Return Factor Model 0.9272 0.6314 0.8717 0.4903 0.9139 0.8522 6 Return Factor Model with 3 Stock Characteristic Factors 0.9167 0.6560 0.8571 0.4360 0.9041 0.8219
Figure 5 Post-Ban Period Analysis Figure 5 plots the value-weighted, mean cumulative difference between actual and estimated returns for the banned stock sub-sample from the end of the short-sale ban to the end of 2008. At the start of the analysis the cumulative difference is set equal to the cumulative difference between actual and estimated returns accrued during the ban period. The cumulative difference is presented for the aggregate sample and subsamples based on performance (positive or negative) six months prior to the ban. Panel B and C report test statistics for the aggregate sample and the negative performance subsample, testing the two hypotheses: Ho: CDi = 0 for all i (no correction) Ha: CDi = -BDi for all i (full correction) where CDi is the cumulative difference between actual and estimated returns for stock i from the end of the ban period to day T after the ban and BDi is the cumulative difference between actual and estimated returns for stock i during the ban period. t-test and standardized cross-sectional (Boehmer et al., 1991) test statistics are reported. The conventional t-test statistic significance threshold values of 2.0 and -2.0 are referenced by dotted lines. Panel A: Difference in Cumulative Actual and Estimated Returns Panel B: Test Statistics for the Aggregate Sample Panel C: Test Statistics for the Negative Performance Subsample
1860 United States Federal Census Name: 6 Geo Hart [2556] Ref #2948 Age in 1860: 43 Birth Year: abt 1817 Birthplace: Pennsylvania Home in 1860: Doylestown, Bucks, Pennsylvania Gender: Male Post Office: Doylestown Household Members: Source Citation: Year: 1860; Census Place: Doylestown, Bucks, Pennsylvania; Roll: M653_1084; Page: 341; Image: 349; Family History Library Film: 805084 Source Information: Ancestry.com. 1860 United States Federal Census [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2009. Images reproduced by FamilySearch. Original data: 1860 U.S. census, population schedule. NARA microfilm publication M653, 1,438 rolls. Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d. Info: Image:
Students will know... strategies for selecting work(s) to perform based on interest, knowledge, own and others’ performance abilities, and context.(select) the structure and the elements of music (analyze) understanding of how expressive qualities (such as dynamics, tempo, articulation, phrasing) and their interpretive decisions convey the music’s intent (analyze) personal performance strengths and weaknesses (analyze) strategies for analyzing a piece of music for composer’s intent, preparation and performance challenges, and context (analyze) characteristics of music from various cultures, styles, genres and composers (interpret) appropriate techniques specific to the instrument or voice used in a quality performance (rehearse, evaluate, refine and present) strategies for developing and refining artistic techniques for performance (rehearse, evaluate, refine and perform) Students will be able to… Creating Generate musical ideas for various purposes and contexts. Select and develop musical ideas for defined purposes and contexts Evaluate and refine selected musical ideas to create musical works that meet appropriate criteria Performing Select varies musical works to present based on interest, knowledge, technical skill, and context Evaluate and refine personal and ensemble performances, individually or in collaboration with others Perform expressively, with appropriate interpretation and technical accuracy, and in a manner appropriate to the audience and context Responding Choose music appropriate for a specific purpose or context Analyze how the structure and context of varied musical works inform the response Support interpretations of musical works that reflect creators’/performers’ expressive intent Support evaluations of musical works and performances based on analysis, interpretation, and established criteria
Sociological Imagination The Sociological Imagination is a book written by sociologist, C. Wright Mills in 1959. His goal in writing this book was to try to reconcile two different and abstract concepts of social reality – the "individual" and "society. 'In essence, it is understanding the private in public terms' C. Wright Mills * Applying your Sociological Imagination to everyday life Coffee. Consider on an individual, personal level it is a drink that provides a pick up due to caffeine content. Coffee drinking is an everyday, commonplace and uninteresting thing. * Consider eating chocolate. What do you think of? However, these everyday acts can be considered from a sociological point of view. We can understand these personal acts in very public terms. Coffee Cultural Rituals Coffee has high symbolic value: for example it is part of many social rituals. It forms part of many people's morning ritual. Two people who arrange to meet for Norms and Deviance Coffee is a drug, and though it is it is acceptable. Other drugs may be acceptable in other cultures. Global Economy Coffee is implicated in a set of social and economic relationships, especially in relation to international trade. It is consumed vastly in wealthy countries but grown in poor ones. Development Coffee drinking presumes a particular pattern of past economic and social development: coffee drinking has a history. It is not a natural part of the 'Western' diet. It is a product of colonialism. Status and Politics Coffee is a ‘globalisation’ issue, in relation to trade, human rights and the environment. It is politicised and what you drink is a 'life choice' e.g. organic, Fairtrade, local coffee shop V Starbucks.
coffee are probably more interested in chatting. The production and transportation involves thousands of people miles away from the drinker. Chocolate Cultural Rituals Norms and Deviance Global Economy Development Status and Politics The Dark Side of Chocolate BY ON • Chocolate comes from cocoa beans, and about 70% of coco beans come from Ghana and the Ivory Coast in Africa. Coco bean plantations where it is grown and harvested have historically relied on child, slave labor to harvest those coco beans so that you and I can eat a product many of them have never tasted. As told by Food Is Power, the reality of human trafficking and modern slavery to produce chocolate is a true evil of our time: “Every research study ever conducted in [Western Africa] shows that there is human trafficking going on, particularly in the Ivory Coast.” While the term “slavery” has a variety of historical contexts, slavery in the cocoa industry involves the same core human rights violations as other forms of slavery throughout the world. Cases often involve acts of physical violence, such as being whipped for working slowly or trying to escape. Reporters have also documented cases where children and adults were locked in at night to prevent them from escaping. Former cocoa slave Aly Diabate told reporters, “The beatings were a part of my life. I had seen others who tried to escape. When they tried, they were severely beaten.” Drissa, a recently freed slave who had never even
ALJ/SCR/ek4 PROPOSED DECISION Agenda ID #15667 (Rev. 1) Ratesetting 5/11/2017 Item #14 Decision PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ ROSCOW (Mailed 4/13/2017) BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Pacific Gas and Electric Company for Approval of 2013-2014 Statewide Marketing, Education and Outreach Program and Budget. (U39M) Application 12-08-007 (Filed August 2, 2012) And Related Matters. Application 12-08-008 Application 12-08-009 Application 12-08-010 DECISION AUTHORIZING SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY TO PROVIDE UP TO $11 MILLION FOR ALISO CANYON-RELATED MESSAGING
LIST OF HRM QUOTA 2018-19 S.N. Name of Student Name of Parents Class Name of KV Shift Order No. Date of Issue by KVS HQ Date of issue by KVS RO Patna Remarks 73 NEETU KUMARI SH. VIRENDRA MAHTO III JAWAHARNAGAR 2319 - II 25.04.2018 27.04.2018 74 ASTITVA KUMAR THAKUR SH. RAVINDRA KUMAR THAKUR IV JAWAHARNAGAR 2320 - II 25.04.2018 27.04.2018 75 SIDHANT KUMAR SH. ONKAR NATH TIWARI V JAWAHARNAGAR 2321 - II 25.04.2018 27.04.2018 76 ALKA KUMARI SH. ONKAR NATH TIWARI VII JAWAHARNAGAR 2322 - II 25.04.2018 27.04.2018
permanently ineligible to receive net surplus electricity compensation, and the electric utility shall retain any kilowatt hours in excess of the eligible customer generator's aggregated electrical load generated during the l2-month period. In the Commission’s review of the large IOUs’ advice letters implementing their NEMA programs, parties requested clarification that the permanent prohibition on NSC only applied to the Generator Account, and not to an Aggregated Account that subsequently separates from a Load Aggregation Arrangement. In Resolution E-4665, the Commission determined that if an account participating in NEMA is removed from the NEMA arrangement and then qualifies for service under the non-NEMA provisions of the NEM tariff, the account is eligible to receive NSC from the IOU on a going-forward basis, provided it meets all other eligibility criteria. As such, the Commission directed the large IOUs to include the following language in their NEM tariffs: If an Aggregated Account that is not a Generating Account is separated from the NEMA Arrangement, and subsequently qualifies for NEM, it is also eligible to receive NSC on a going-forward basis, provided it meets all other applicable NEM eligibility criteria. In order to ensure that there is consistency in how NSC eligibility is applied across the small IOUs and large IOUs, we direct the small IOUs to include the following language in their revised NEM tariffs: If an Aggregated Account that is not a Generating Account is separated from the NEMA Arrangement, and subsequently qualifies for NEM, it is also eligible to receive NSC on a basis, provided it meets all other applicable NEM eligibility criteria. Issue 5: Non-NEM Eligible Generator with NEMA Arrangement In the Commission’s review of the large IOUs’ advice letters implementing their NEMA programs, parties raised a concern that one of the IOUs’ proposed changes would prohibit the combination of a non-NEM eligible generator with a NEMA arrangement. In Resolution E-4665, the Commission clarified that NEMA accounts are allowed to have non-NEM eligible generating facilities directly interconnected to them, and directed the IOUs to modify their NEM tariffs to reflect this. In order to ensure consistency in how NEMA arrangements are treated across the small IOUs and large IOUs, we direct the small IOUs to ensure their tariffs
(C) If the department Department of Community and Institutional Corrections determines that a prisoner has violated a term of the community supervision program and the community supervision should be revoked, a probation agent must initiate a proceeding in General Sessions Court. The proceeding must be initiated pursuant to a warrant or a citation issued by a probation agent setting forth the violations of the community supervision program. The court shall determine whether: (1) the terms of the community supervision program are fair and reasonable; (2) the prisoner has complied with the terms of the community supervision program; (3) the prisoner should continue in the community supervision program under the current terms; (4) the prisoner should continue in the community supervision program under other terms and conditions as the court considers appropriate; (5) the prisoner has wilfully violated a term of the community supervision program. If the court determines that a prisoner has wilfully violated a term or condition of the community supervision program, the court may impose any other terms or conditions considered appropriate and may continue the prisoner on community supervision, or the court may revoke the prisoner’s community supervision and impose a sentence of up to one year for violation of the community supervision program. A prisoner who is incarcerated for revocation of the community supervision program is not eligible to earn any type of credits which would reduce the sentence for violation of the community supervision program. (D) If a prisoner’s community supervision is revoked by the court and the court imposes a period of incarceration for the revocation, the prisoner also must complete a community supervision program of up to two years as determined by the department Department of Community and Institutional Corrections pursuant to subsection (B) when he is released from incarceration. A prisoner who is sentenced for successive revocations of the community supervision program may be required to serve terms of incarceration for successive revocations, as provided in Section 2421560 subsection(C), and may be required to serve additional periods of community supervision for successive revocations, as provided in Section 2421560 subsection(D). The maximum aggregate amount of time a prisoner may be required to serve when sentenced for successive revocations may not exceed an amount of
September 23 32 UNIT 3: DATABASES AND SQL Data base Concepts: Introduction to data base concepts and its need. Relational data model: Concept of domain, tuple, relation, key, primary key, alternate key, candidate key; Relational algebra: Selection, Projection, Union and Cartesian product; Structured Query Language: General Concepts: Advantages of using SQL, Data Definition Language and Data Manipulation Language; Data Types: NUMBER/DECIMAL, CHARACTER/VARCHAR/VARCHAR2, DATE; SQL COMMANDS:CREATE TABLE, DROP TABLE, ALTER TABLE, UPDATE ….SET…., INSERT, DELETE; SELECT, DISTINCT, FROM, WHERE, IN, BETWEEN, GROUPBY, HAVING, ORDERBY; SQL functions: SUM, AVG, COUNT, MAX AND MIN; Obtaining results (SELECT query) from 2 tables using equi-join and Union Note: Implementation of the above mentioned commands could be done on any SQL supported software onone or two tables. UNIT 4: BOOLEAN ALGEBRA Role of Logical Operations in Computing. Binary-valued Quantities, Boolean Variable, Boolean Constant and Boolean Operators: AND, OR, NOT; Truth Tables; Closure Property, Commutative Law, Associative Law, Identity law, Inverse Law, Principle of Duality, Idem potent Law, Distributive Law, Absorption Law, Involution Law, DeMorgan's Law and their applications; Obtaining Sum of Product (SOP) and Product of Sum (POS) form from the Truth Table, Reducing Boolean Expression (SOP and POS) to its minimal form, Use of Karnaugh Map for minimization of Boolean expressions (up to 4 variables); Application of Boolean Logic: Digital electronic circuit design using basic Logic Gates (NOT, AND, OR, NAND, NOR) Use of Boolean operators (AND, OR) in search engine queries. 20+12 October 15 18 UNIT 5: COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES Evolution of Networking: ARPANET, Internet, Interspace Different ways of sending data across the network with reference to switching techniques (Circuit and Packet switching); 18+0
considered and adopted for each utility. The guidelines include considerations of the needs of customers regarding understanding, acceptance, preferences, and other similar factors (at Guideline 9). 2. Customer Impact: CforAT focused our participation on the potential impacts of changes to time periods for use in future TOU rates on vulnerable customers. At the workshop held on February 26, 2016, CforAT gave a presentation stressing the need for TOU rate design that is simple in order to promote customer understanding and acceptance. These concerns were accepted by the Commission and discussed at some length in the PD; they were also incorporated into Guideline 9 of the Policy Guidelines Applicable to the Design, Implementation and Modification of Time-of-Use (TOU) Periods to be Used in Rate Designs (attached as Appendix 1 to the decision). The final decision also agrees with the significance of CforAT’s concerns, set out in Comments on the Proposed Decision (filed on November 21, 2016), though it found that recommended modifications to the language of the decision were not necessary to reinforce the significance of customer protections. CforAT’s participation at the February 26, 2016 workshop is memorialized in the Final Decision at page 9. Guideline 9 of the adopted policy guidelines strongly reflects the concerns articulated by CforAT regarding TOU periods and rate design, particularly as applied to vulnerable customers. The decision addresses CforAT’s input on Guideline 9, agreeing with CforAT that various “statutory requirements continue to apply to rates,” and noting that nothing in the final decision “overrides the protections and rate design requirements adopted, or to be adopted, in R.12-06-013 for residential customers.” Final Decision at pp. The final decision also agrees with CforAT’s position that residential customers will need a simpler rate design than larger, more sophisticated customers. Id. Verified
APPENDIX Compensation Decision Summary Information Compensation Decision: D1705010 Modifies Decision? Contribution Decision(s): D1701006 Proceeding(s): R1512012 Author: ALJ McKinney Payer(s): Commission’s Intervenor Compensation Fund Intervenor Information Intervenor Claim Date Amount Requested Amount Awarded Multiplier? Reason Change/Disallowance Center for Accessible Technology 03/09/2017 $17,353.50 $17,173.75 N/A Non-resolved Matters Advocate Information First Name Last Name Type Intervenor Hourly Fee Requested Year Hourly Fee Requested Hourly Fee Adopted Melissa Kasnitz Attorney CforAT $450 2015 $450 Melissa Kasnitz Attorney CforAT $455 2016 $455 Melissa Kasnitz Attorney CforAT $455 2017 $455 (END OF APPENDIX)
SED/EIM/RNC/MDR/AGG/FKO/ATM/vdl DRAFT Agenda ID 15756 Ratesetting Decision ____________ BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of the City of Arcata to construct new temporary crossing improvements North of Gannon Slough Application 16-12-017 (Filed December 21, 2016) DECISION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF ARCATA TO CONSTRUCT A NEW TEMPORARY AT-GRADE PEDESTRIAN-RAIL CROSSING OVER THE NORTH COAST RAILROAD AUTHORITY TRACKS NORTH OF GANNON SLOUGH IN THE CITY OF ARCATA, COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT Summary This decision grants the City of Arcata authorization to construct a new temporary at-grade pedestrian-rail crossing over the North Coast Railroad Authority tracks north of Gannon Slough in the City of Arcata, Humboldt County. The at-grade pedestrian-rail crossing will be identified as Gannon Slough pedestrian crossing, California Public Utilities Commission Crossing Number 104-290.64-D and United States Department of Transportation Number 972246F. This proceeding is closed. Discussion The City of Arcata (City) requests authority to construct a new temporary at-grade pedestrian-rail crossing (crossing) over the North Coast Railroad Authority (NCRA) tracks in the City, Humboldt County. The double track crossing will be a 10-foot wide asphalt pathway that crosses the tracks at an approximate 90-degree angle. There is currently no rail service on this portion of
Intervenor must satisfy intervenor compensation requirements set forth in Pub. Util. Code §§ 1801-1812: Intervenor CPUC Verified Timely filing of notice of intent to claim compensation (NOI) (§ 1804(a)): 1. Date of Prehearing Conference (PHC): February 26, 2016 Verified 2. Other specified date for NOI: 3. Date NOI filed: March 11, 2016 Verified 4. Was the NOI timely filed? Yes Showing of customer or customer-related status (§ 1802(b)): 5. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding number: R. 14-10-010 6. Date of ALJ ruling: 02/03/15 7. Based on another CPUC determination (specify): D.16-10-015 8. Has the Intervenor demonstrated customer or customer-related status? Yes Showing of “significant financial hardship” (§ 1802(g)): 9. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding number: R. 14-10-010 10. Date of ALJ ruling: 11. Based on another CPUC determination (specify): D.16-10-015 02/03/15 12. 12. Has the Intervenor demonstrated significant financial hardship? Yes Timely request for compensation (§ 1804(c)): 13. Identify Final Decision: D.17-01-006 Verified 14. Date of issuance of Final Order or Decision: Jan. 23, 2017 Verified 15. File date of compensation request: Feb. 24, 2017 Verified 16. Was the request for compensation timely? Yes PART II: SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION Did the Intervenor substantially contribute to the final decision (see § 1802(i), § 1803(a), and D.98-04-059). Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) Specific References to Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) CPUC Discussion D.17-01-006 adopts policy guidelines to assess time periods for future TOU rates and energy resource contract (Please note that Attachment 2 includes a list of issue areas, and of GPI Pleadings relevant to this Claim.)
NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY COUNCIL AREA COMMMITTEE – SOUTH EAST At a meeting of the Area Committee – South East held at Briardale Community Centre, Briardale Road, Cowpen, Blyth on Wednesday, 16 September 2015 at 6.00 pm. PRESENT Councillor D Campbell (in the Chair) MEMBERS E Cartie J G Davey S Davey B M Flux B Gallacher J J Gobin K O Graham A Hepple T Johnstone K Parry L Pidcock M Purvis I C F Swithenbank V Tyler A Wallace T S Wilson OFFICERS M Carle D Colwell A Cryer G Davies N Easton T Garnick I Hedley P Jones R McKenzie K Norris Area Highways Manager South East Implementation Manager, iNorthumberland Neighbourhood Services Area Manager Engagement Manager Policy Officer (Economic and Inclusion) Neighbourhood Services Area Manager Locality Development Officer Head of Neighbourhood Services Senior Programme Officer, Highways and Transport Democratic Services Officer ALSO PRESENT: C Curtis – Arriva North East K Walker – Blyth Development Trust members of the public 15. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Apologies for absence were received from Councillors Arckless, Daley, Dickinson, Douglas, Dungworth, Foster, Grimshaw, Lang, Ledger, Nisbet, B Pidcock, Reid, Richards, Rickerby, Simpson and Webb.
areas that impact costs in this category of $147.8 million in DC reductions as allow the to be subject to review and protest by other parties As t a mix of investmentsgrowratepayer during , creating the potential for ratepayer inter-generational inequities payer contributionthe proposed DCE Assignment of Proceeding Martha GuzmanAceves is the assigned Commissioner and Darcie L. Houck is the assigned ALJ in this proceeding. Findings of Fact PG&E filed A.1603006, its 2015 NDCTP on March 1, 2016. PG&E owns the DCPP Units 1 and 2, and HBPP Unit 3. Every nuclear power plant operator is required to enter a standard SNF disposal agreement with the DOE; these agreements provided that DOE will start accepting SNF starting January 31, 1998 to transport it to a permanent repository. No permanent U.S. repository has been established.
09/06/17 10:00 a.m. ALJ Hymes Comr Guzman- Aceves A.17-02-005 (EH) - Application of Pacific Gas and Electric Company for Compliance Review of Utility Owned Generation Operations, Electric Energy Resource Recovery Account Entries, Contract Administration, Economic Dispatch of Electric Resources, Utility Owned Generation Fuel Procurement, Diablo Canyon Seismic Studies Balancing Account, and Other Activities for the Period January 1 through December 31, 2016 (U39E), Commission Courtroom, San Francisco (Also September 7) 09/12/17 9:30 a.m. ALJ Simon Comr Picker A.16-10-019 (EH) - Order Instituting Rulemaking to Implement Portions of AB 117 Concerning Community Choice Aggregation Commission Courtroom, San Francisco (Also September 13) 09/25/17 9:30 a.m. ALJ Cooke ALJ Goldberg ALJ Wong Comr Peterman A.17-01-020 (EH) - Application of San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U902E) for Approval of SB 350 Transportation Electrification Proposals, And Related Matters: A.17-01-021 A.17-01-022 Commission Courtroom, San Francisco (Also September 26- 29; October 2 – 4 and 6; and October 9 - 13) 10/24/17 10:00 a.m. ALJ Houck Comr Guzman- Aceves A.16-03-004 (STC) - Joint Application of Southern California Edison Company (U338E) and San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U902E) For the 2015 Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Triennial Proceedings, Commission Courtroom, San Francisco NOTICE OF ALL-PARTY MEETINGS (PU Code § 1701.3(c)) (A quorum of Commissioners and/or their staff may attend All-Party Meetings noticed on the Daily Calendar.) NONE
Occurrence and hazards reporting Know the means and procedures for reporting occurrences and hazards. Safety Risk Management (SRM) process including roles and responsibilities Understand the Safety Risk Management process. Everyone to know his or her own role in the SRM. Continuous improvement of safety performance Understand the principles of continuous improvement of safety performance. Compliance Monitoring Understand the basic principles of Compliance Monitoring. Responsibility when contracting activities Understand the Company’s responsibilities when contracting activities. Everyone should know his or her own roles and responsibilities regarding this subject.
Ex.2 – Preparation for and Action after Flight Ground only Ex.3 - Air Experience 0.5 Ex.4 – Effects of Controls 0.7 Ex.5 – Power & Attitude Changes 0.8 Ex.6a – Straight & Level Flight 0.5 1.0 Ex.6b – Climbing 0.5 Ex. 6c - Descending 0.5 Ex.6d – Turning 0.5 Ex.7 – Basic Autorotation 1.0 Ex 8a – Hovering 2.0 Ex.8b –Hover Taxi, Clearing Turns 1.0 Ex.8c – Hovering, Taxiing, Emergencies 1.0 Ex.9 – Take-off & Landing 1.0 Ex.10 – Transitions 1.0 Ex.11a – Circuit, Approach, Landing 1.0 1.8 Ex.11b – Steep & Limited Power approaches 1.0 Ex.11c – Circuit Emergencies 0.5 Ex.12 – First Solo 0.2 Ex.13 – Sideways & Backwards 0.5 0.5 Ex.14 – Spot Turns 0.5 0.5 Ex.15 – HOGE, Vortex Ring 0.5 Ex.16 – Simulated Engine-off Landings 1.0 Ex.17 –Advanced Autorotations 2.5 Ex.18 – Practice Forced Landings 1.0 Ex.19 – Steep Turns 0.5 Ex.20 – Precision Transitions 0.5 1.0 Ex.21 - Quickstops 1.0 Ex.22a – Navigation 3.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 Ex.22b – Low Level/Reduced Visibility Navigation 1.0 1.0 Ex.22c – Radio Navigation 1.0 1.0 Ex.23 – Advanced Take-offs, Landings & Transitions 1.0 Ex.24 – Sloping Ground 0.5 Ex.25 – Limited Power 1.0 Ex.26 – Confined Area 1.0 Totals 30 10 5 5 1.4.3 Flight Training – PPL(A) The PPL(A) course comprises 45 hours of flight instruction including at least 25 hours of dual flight instruction and 10 hours of supervised solo flight time, including 5 hours of solo cross country flight time. Flt Sortie Flight Time Total Remarks Dual Solo 1 Effects of Controls 1 1.2 1.2 Ex.4(i) 2 Straight and Level 1 1.2 2.4 Ex.6(i); 5a
CD ratio as on 30.06.2014 (Amount in crores) S.No Name of the District Deposits Advances CD Ratio 1 Srikakulam 4702.29 4972.58 105.75 2 Vizianagaram 4310.12 4135.89 95.96 3 Visakhapatnam 29366.19 26097.35 88.87 4 East Godavari 15778.75 21138.20 133.97 Achievement under Annual Credit Plan 2014-15 in North Coastal districts of Andhra Pradesh as on 23.09.2014 in Agriculture sector - Disbursements:- (Amount in crores) District Short Term Crop Production Loans Term Loans to Agriculture and allied activities Total Agriculture Loans Kharif Target Achieve ment % of achieve ment Kharif Target Achieve ment % of achieve ment Kharif Target Achieve ment % of achieve ment 1.Srikakulam 1378 297 22% 349 32 9% 1727 329 19% 2.Vijayanagaram 850 223 26% 230 41 18% 1080 264 24% 3.Visakhapatnam 624 340 54% 347 72 21% 971 412 42% 4. East Godavari 3309 1485 45% 998 280 28% 4307 1765 41%
Which statement best describes your pain? (tick one box only) Always present (always the same intensity) Always present (level of pain varies) Often present (pain free periods last less than 6 hours) Occasionally present (pain occurs once to several times per day, lasting up to an hour) Rarely present (pain occurs every few days or weeks) Do you have any of the following medical conditions? Heart disease Ulcer or stomach disease Anaemia or other blood disease High blood pressure Kidney disease Osteoarthritis, degenerative arthritis Lung disease Depression/Anxiety Rheumatoid arthritis Diabetes Cancer Stroke or other neurological condition Other medical problems (please specify) ………………………….. Section 2 – Health care 1 How many times in the past 3 months have you seen a general practitioner in regard to your pain? ...……. times 2 How many times in the past 3 months have you seen a medical specialist (e.g. orthopaedic surgeon) in regard to your pain? …..……. times 3 How many times in the past 3 months have you seen health professionals other than doctors (e.g. physiotherapist, chiropractor, psychologist) in regard to your pain? …..……. times 4 How many times in the past 3 months have you visited a hospital emergency department in regard to your pain? Include all visits regardless of whether or not you were admitted to the hospital from the emergency department …..……. times 5 How many times in the past 3 months have you been admitted to hospital as an inpatient because of your pain? …..……. times 6 How many diagnostic tests (e.g. X-rays, scans) have you had in the last 3 months relating to your pain? …..……. tests Section 3 – Medication use List all the medications you are taking (include all prescription and over-the-counter medicines) Medicine name (as on the label) Medicine strength (as on the label) How many do you take per day? How many days per week do you take this medication?
August 13, 2015. In addition, the Commission specifically directed TracFone to comply with short-term reporting requirements relative to a Federal Communications Commission Consent Decree and to issue only unlocked handset devices to qualified Lifeline customers in California until such time that TracFone could demonstrate compliance with federal handset unlocking policies. The Commission directed TracFone to file a Tier 2 advice letter when it could demonstrate that it had unlocked phones ready to issue to new customers. TracFone filed AL 6 on October 8, 2015, to demonstrate it had unlocked phones available to issue. Commission staff approved the advice letter on December 17, 2015, which allowed TracFone to begin offering both federal and state wireless service to customers in California using the unlocked devices. Subject of Advice Letter On January 23, 2017, TracFone submitted AL 14 requesting that the Commission correct terminology in Resolution T-17467 that TracFone alleges creates ambiguity with the use of the term “unlockable” phones. In addition, having demonstrated its established unlocking methods for new models of locked handsets to Commission staff, TracFone requested Commission approval to begin issuing the new handsets which are capable of being unlocked without a hardware swap. At Communications Division (CD) staff’s request, TracFone submitted AL Supplement 14A on April 10, 2017, which detailed the public interest benefits of issuing the new locked handset models capable of being unlocked without a hardware swap. Notice/Protests TracFone served AL 14 via email on all parties on the ETC service list and the advice letter appeared in the Commission’s Daily Calendar on January 26, 2017. No protests were received. Discussion FCC Compliance with Unlockable Devices On June 30, 2015, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) issued an Order and Consent Decree having found TracFone in violation of handset unlocking provisions for wireless carriers. Consistent with industry practice, the FCC referred directly to the CTIA – The Wireless Association® Consumer Code for Wireless Service (Consumer Code) as “a safe harbor for eligible telecommunications carriers (ETCs) to demonstrate that they have met the standards required to serve as an ETC.” In the TracFone settlement agreement, the FCC resolved the matter of TracFone’s use of locked handsets and established a compliance plan requirement for TracFone with specific reporting obligations scheduled upon the expiration of the Consent Decree.
ALJ/DH7/jt2 Date of Issuance 6/1/2017 Decision 17-05-020 May 25, 2017 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Pacific Gas and Electric Company in its 2015 Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Triennial Proceeding (U39E). Application 1603006 (Filed March 1, 2016) DECISION APPROVING DECOMMISSIONING COST ESTIMATE
alternatives were considered consistent with the common summary format and the milestone being developed in A.16-03-004. Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) shall develop, in consultation with the Energy Division and other interested parties, a cost categorization structure for tracking expenditures as discussed herein, which includes a reasonable path to compare the decommissioning costs previously estimated to actual costs expended. PG&E shall present the cost categorization structure, including how it conforms with the requirements of Ordering Paragraph 3 (immediately above), as supplemental testimony in support of its application associated with its detailed sitespecific decommissioning cost estimate prepared as part of A.1608006. Pacific Gas and Electric Company will file its detailed sitespecific decommissioning cost estimate for Diablo Canyon Power Plant once completed in the following triennial proceeding. The sitespecific decommissioning cost shall include an assessment for expediting dry cask loading. This assessment shall include both preshutdown and post shut options and costs for expediting dry cask loading. Pacific Gas and Electric Company must file annually Forecast and Recorded Decommissioning Disbursements Tier 2 Advice Letters (AL); each such AL must show information supporting the requested disbursement tied to the Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Estimate and show expenditures and related progress toward specific major milestones in the decommissioning process. Pacific Gas and Electric Company shall provide testimony in the next nuclear decommissioning triennial proceeding consistent with Section 8, Reporting and Format Requirements for Next NDCTP, of this Decision. This information will include a summary and results of consultation with the
ATTACHMENT B REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO COMPETITIVE LOCAL EXCHANGE CARRIERS AND INTEREXCHANGE CARRIERS Applicant must file, in this docket with reference to this decision number, a written acceptance of the certificate granted in this proceeding within 30 days of the effective date of this order. The certificate granted and the authority to render service under the rates, charges and rules authorized will expire if not exercised within 12 months of the date of this order. Applicant is subject to the following fees and surcharges that must be regularly remitted. Per the instructions in Exhibit E to Decision (D.) 0010028, the Combined California PUC Telephone Surcharge Transmittal Form must be submitted even if the amount due is $0. a. The Universal Lifeline Telephone Service Trust Administrative Committee Fund (Pub. Util. Code § 879); b. The California Relay Service and Communications Devices Fund (Pub. Util. Code § 2881; D.9812073); c. The California High Cost FundA (Pub. Util. Code § 739.3; D.9610066, at 34, App. B, Rule 1.C); d. The California High Cost FundB (D.9610066, at 191, App. B, Rule 6.F.; D.0712054); e. The California Advanced Services Fund (D.0712054); f. The California Teleconnect Fund (D.9610066, at 88, App. B, Rule 8.G). g. The User Fee provided in Pub. Util. Code §§ 431435. The minimum annual User Fee is $100, as set forth in D.1305035. Note: These fees change periodically. In compliance with Resolution T16901, December 2, 2004, Applicant must check the joint tariff for surcharges and fees filed by Pacific Bell Telephone Company (dba AT&T California) and apply the
APPENDIX Compensation Decision Summary Information Compensation Decision: D1705030 Modifies Decision? Contribution Decision(s): D1503002; D1510052 Proceeding(s): A1305017 Author: Commissioner Rechtschaffen Payer(s): California-American Water Company Intervenor Information Intervenor Claim Date Amount Requested Amount Awarded Multiplier? Reason Change/Disallowance Public Water Now (formerly Citizens for Public Water) December 21, 2015 $16,504.73 $16,617.51 N/A N/A Advocate Information First Name Last Name Type Intervenor Hourly Fee Requested Year Hourly Fee Requested Hourly Fee Adopted George Riley Public Water Now $100.00 2013 $100.00 George Riley Public Water Now $100.00 2014 $105.00 George Riley Public Water Now $100.00 2015 $105.00 Marc Del Piero Attorney Public Water Now $300.00 2013 $300.00 (END OF APPENDIX)
S. No. Item with Description Rate per one unit 1 Tent 18 x 36 (in feets) 12 x 24 (in feets) 9 x 18 (in feets) 2 Side Walls 9 x 18 (in feets) 3 Carpet 9 x 18 (in feets) 4 Green mat 6 x 50 (300 sft) 5 Backdrop per sqft 6 Pandal Pandal (Pipe) per sqft Pandal (Pipe) water proof per sqft 7 Table : 2 x 4 (in feets) 8 Table cloth : 2 x 8 (in feets) 9 Round table with cloth for dining of 6 people with chair without chair 10 Plastic Chair 11 Bedset containing the following items Mattress with cover – 01 Pillow with cover – 01 Bedsheet – 01 Bedsheet (Chaadar) – 01 12 Folding cot 13 Pedestal fan 14 Generator 60KVA 125 KVA 15 Halogen lamp 1000 W 1500 W 16 Mercury lamp 17 PA system with DJ 18 VIP Chair 19 VVIP Sofa 2 seater 3 seater Tea table SIGNATURE OF THE BIDDER WITH NAME & ADDRESS,CONTACT
5. Experience of internal verification. D Knowledge, skills, abilities 1. Knowledge of and the ability to apply relevant expertise within the workplace environment. E 2. Effective team working. E 3. Ability to meet targets and deadlines E 4. Good communication and interpersonal skills E 5. Effective administration skills and ability to maintain records E 6. Good organisation and time management and the ability to work with minimum supervision. E 7. Ability to empathise with a wide range of learners and communicate effectively E 8. Awareness of health and safety procedures E 9. Recent occupational updating E 10. Awareness of Ofsted and QAA D 11. Knowledge and use of ILT D 12. Knowledge of key requirements of English and Maths. D 13. Awareness of programmes of study D Further Requirements
APPENDIX Compensation Decision Summary Information Compensation Decision: Modifies Decision? No Contribution Decision(s): D1612066 Proceeding(s): I1405012 Author: ALJ Mason Payer(s): Intervenor Compensation Fund Intervenor Information Intervenor Claim Date Amount Requested Amount Awarded Multiplier? Reason Change/Disallowance Center for Accessible Technology 03/06/17 $ $32,965.8 N/A Unresolved Issues Advocate Information First Name Last Name Type Intervenor Hourly Fee Requested Year Hourly Fee Requested Hourly Fee Adopted Melissa Kasnitz Attorney CforAT $450 2015 $450 Melissa Kasnitz Attorney CforAT $455 2016 $455 Melissa Kasnitz Attorney CforAT $455 2017 $455 Kate Woodford Advocate CforAT $140 2016 $140 (END OF APPENDIX)
order in writing in the patient’s clinical record, with a signature, time, and date. Verbal orders are those physician orders that are spoken to qualified medical personnel. Verbal orders would also have to be recorded in the patient’s plan of care. Reliance on an agency to maintain physician orders in written form would protect patients by ensuring that the plan of care incorporated all services and treatments ordered by the physician who is responsible for the home health plan of care. If a physician faxed orders or otherwise transmitted them through other electronic methods from their office, those orders would be required to be included in the patient’s clinical record and plan of care. Provides an opportunity for an agency to establish policies defining who is authorized to accept physicians’ verbal orders. The categories of practitioners identified as being authorized to accept physicians’ verbal orders by the agency would be required to be consistent with state requirements. Proposed §484.60(b)(5), requires that verbal orders be authenticated, dated, and timed by the physician according to the agency’s internal policies and applicable state law and regulations. Title 22, section 74701 is much different.
Incident investigation records may include information subject to the lawyer-client privilege, official information privilege, or similar disclosure limitations. The CPRA exempts such information from disclosure. The Commission has often stated that Cal. Pub. Util. Code § 315, which expressly prohibits the introduction of accident reports filed with the Commission, or orders and recommendations issued by the Commission, “as evidence in any action for damages based on or arising out of such loss of life, or injury to person or property,” offers utilities sufficient protection against injury caused by the release of requested investigation records. COMMENTS ON DRAFT RESOLUTION The Draft Resolution was mailed to interested parties on May 12, 2017 in accordance with Cal. Pub. Util. Code § 311(g). Comments were filed on____________. Reply comments were filed on __________________. FINDINGS OF FACT The Commission received a request which seeks disclosure of the Commission’s records of its investigation concerning an electrical incident that occurred on July 15, 2014 at 6645 86th Place, Los Angeles, California. Access to the records in the Commission’s investigation file was denied in the absence of a Commission order authorizing disclosure. The Commission’s investigation of the incident is closed. Therefore, the public interest favors disclosure of the requested Commission’s investigation records, with the exception of any personal information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, or any information which is subject to the Commission’s lawyer-client or other privilege. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The documents in the requested Commission’s investigation file and report are public records as defined by Cal. Gov’t. Code § 6250, et seq. The California Constitution favors disclosure of governmental records by, among other things, stating that the people have the right of access to information concerning the conduct of the peoples’ business, and therefore, the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies shall be
ALJ/PM6/mln/sf3 Date of Issuance 5/30/2017 Decision 17-05-031 May 25, 2017 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA City of Ojai, Complainant, vs. Golden State Water Company (U133W), Defendant. Case 1606008 (Filed June 14, 2016) ORDER EXTENDING STATUTORY DEADLINE Summary This decision extends the statutory deadline for completion of this proceeding until September 14, 2017. Background Public Utilities Code Section (Pub. Util. Code §) 1701.2(e) provides that adjudicatory cases, such as this one, shall be resolved within 12 months of initiation unless the Commission makes findings as to why the deadline cannot be met and/or issues an order extending that deadline. The 12-month statutory deadline for this proceeding is June 14, 2017. On July 14, 2016, the City of Ojai (Complainant or City) filed this complaint against Golden State Water Company (GSWC), for the primary
1.2 Provisional visa 188C SIV details Name of primary applicant for provisional visa Which state/territory nominated you for the provisional visa Date of provisional visa sponsorship Date of provisional visa grant Date of provisional visa expiry No. of days in Australia on this visa (approx). For evidence required, please see Part 8 - 1.3 Details of family unit members to be included in your visa application (if applicable) Full name DOB Relationship to you Full name DOB Relationship to you Full name DOB Relationship to you Full name DOB Relationship to you Full name DOB Relationship to you Full name DOB Relationship to you Full name DOB Relationship to you Part 2 – Details of migration agent / representative (if applicable) 2.1 Migration agent / representative Title Full name Business name Migration Agent Registration Number Telephone Email
Current investment in Managed Fund 4 Form 1413 & letter from my Fund Manager attached Amount invested A$ Dates held From: To: Present Name of fund Managing institution Fund Manager name Fund Manager phone Fund Manager email Previous investment in managed fund 1 Amount invested A$ Dates held From: To: Name of fund Managing institution Fund Manager name Fund Manager phone Fund Manager email Previous investment in managed fund 2 Amount invested A$ Dates held From: To: Name of fund Managing institution Fund Manager name Fund Manager phone Fund Manager email Previous investment in managed fund 3 Amount invested A$ Dates held From: To: Name of fund Managing institution Fund Manager name Fund Manager phone Fund Manager email Amount invested A$ Dates held From: To:
Direct investment in an Australian proprietary company 1 Name of business (if known) Suburb & postcode of business (if known) Type of business Proposed investment amount A$ Direct investment in an Australian proprietary company 2 Name of business (if known) Suburb & postcode of business (if known) Type of business Proposed investment amount A$ Direct investment in an Australian proprietary company 3 Name of business (if known) Suburb & postcode of business (if known) Type of business Proposed investment amount A$
Date 7.3 Declaration by migration agent/representative I have explained all of the NSW nomination criteria and conditions to the applicant, and believe that the applicant understands the information, including the privacy statement and the applicant’s declaration above. To the best of my knowledge, I believe that the information provided in this application is complete, true and accurate. Migration agent / representative’s signature ______________________ Migration agent / representative’s name Date Part 8 – Checklist (tick if provided) Below are examples of the types of documents you can submit to support your claims. You do not need to provide all documents listed below but you should provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that you meet each criterion. How to label your documents
To the best of my knowledge, I believe that the information provided in this application is complete, true and accurate. Migration agent / representative’s signature ______________________ Migration agent / representative’s name Date Part 8 – Checklist (tick if provided) Below are examples of the types of documents you can submit to support your claims. You do not need to provide all documents listed below but you should provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that you meet each criterion. How to label your documents
Jones Singles Takeaway Group June Clayton 01455 209545 Varies Evening Singles Dining Val Howson 01455 552130 Varies Varies Joint Golf Section Peter Moore Ken Patton 01455 552594 01455 556996 As arranged Varies Always check online for possible timing variations.