Community Partnerships maintain a partnership with the community. There is little, if any, explanation as to the value the identified partnerships will bring to student participants or the program. with the community but provides little explanation as to the value of the identified partnerships will bring to student participants and the program. maintain partnerships with the community. The value of the partnerships established will bring to student participants and the program is clear. program will evaluate community partnerships to maximize their value to students and program for the purposes of ensuring the program meets its goals and objectives. Criteria Points Awarded: Reviewer Comments: Responsibility Checklist Collaborations and Partnership Form Review Rubric Poor Fair Good Excellent 0 1 2 3 Responsibility Checklist and Collaborations and Partnerships Form The Responsibility Checklist and Collaborations and Partnerships Form have not been filled out at all or there are multiple instances of missing information. The Responsibility Checklist and Collaborations and Partnerships Form have been filled out, with little or no missing information. Criteria Points Awarded: Reviewer Comments: Total Points Awarded for Section 3: (out of 12 possible points) Section 4: Program Management 42 points Agency Background and Capacity Summarizes the lead agency's mission, history, past performance, and promise of success in providing educational and related activities that will complement and enhance the academic achievement and positive student development of the targeted population. Review Rubric Poor Fair Good Excellent 0 1 2 3 Past Performance The application gives little or no detail about the lead agency's prior experience, successful or otherwise, in providing educational and related activities that enhance the academic achievement and positive student development. The population served by the lead agency is unclear, nonspecific, or different The application demonstrates, with little programmatic detail, the lead agency's experience providing educational and related activities to the targeted population. The positive impacts of this programming on student achievement and positive student development, The application clearly details the lead agency's programmatic experience serving the targeted population and the positive impacts of its work on academic achievement and positive student development. "Good" criteria and: It is clear how this experience will shape future programming to benefit the target population.
intent to submit its application for a 21st Century Community Learning Center and how the community can view the completed subgrant application. applicant's intent to submit its application for a 21st Century Community Learning Center and includes how/where the community can view the completed subgrant application. Criteria Points Awarded: Reviewer Comments: Personnel Describes the staffing for proposed activities and services, including brief job descriptions of key staff. Describes how highly qualified and effective people will be recruited and selected for these program positions. Review Rubric Poor Fair Good Excellent 0 1 2 3 Staffing The applicant provides little or no detail how it will recruit select and select highly qualified and effective staff to implement the program. The applicant describes, at a high-level, how it will recruit and select staff identified as being key to implementing the program. However, the applicant does not provide full job descriptions of key staff for the program. The applicant details how it will recruit and select staff identified as being key to implementing the program. Each key staff position includes a brief job description aligned to the proposed activities and services that the staff will manage. "Good" criteria and: The applicant links specific recruitment and selection strategies to key staff positions such that the program will recruit and retain highly qualified and effective people to lead the program. Criteria Points Awarded: Reviewer Comments: Describes how the program will encourage and use appropriately qualified individuals to serve as volunteers. Review Rubric Poor Fair Good Excellent 0 1 2 3 Volunteers The applicant provides little or no detail about how it will recruit and use appropriately qualified individuals to serve as program volunteers. The applicant's plan to recruit and use appropriately qualified individuals to serve as volunteers is too high-level to be meaningful. The applicant does not meaningfully link the recruitment of highly qualified volunteers to specific program activities and services. The applicant details an explicit plan to recruit and use appropriately qualified individuals to serve as volunteers for specific program activities and services. "Good" criteria and: The applicant includes opportunities for recognizing highly qualified volunteers for their service to the program. Criteria Points Awarded: Reviewer Comments:
Federal law mandates that non-public school administrators are consulted in a timely and meaningful manner during the design and development of the program. Describes how this was done with representatives of non-public schools who are based in the subgrant school(s) program service area. If there are no non-public schools in the program service area, indicates that. (This question is worth all points or no points.) Attaches an “Intent to Participate” form for each non-public school in the school(s) service area to this subgrant application. Review Rubric Poor Fair Good Excellent 0 1 2 3 Non-Public Schools Consultation There is little to no detail about how non-public school administrators or representatives of schools who are based in the subgrant school(s) program service area were consulted in a timely and meaningful manner during the design and development of the program. are no non-public schools in the program service area OR the applicant provided a detailed explanation of how non-public school administrators and representatives of schools who are based in the subgrant school(s) program service area were consulted in a timely and meaningful development of the program. Criteria Points Awarded: Reviewer Comments: Office of Childcare Licensing Indicates which type of arrangement the program will operate to meet Delaware Office of Child Care Licensing Requirements. (0 points) Total Points Awarded for Section 4: (out of 42 possible points) Section 5: Program Design 81 points (63 points for summer or school year only) Needs Assessment Identifies the target population, method of determination of need, recognize root causes, and provides supporting data as evidence. Uses poverty information, academic achievement data, and other relevant data sources to detail the need. Target Population: Students Needs: Attendance Review Rubric Poor Fair Good Excellent 0 1 2 3 Root Causes The applicant does not identify any root causes for the targeted group or the root causes identified are not meaningful (too broad or not clear root causes of the item assessed). The applicant's identified root causes are explicit for the target group but are not meaningfully supported by clear data. The applicant identified root causes for the target group that are supported by specific data that clearly support the identification of the root causes. "Good" criteria and: The applicant identifies the source for each of data used as evidence for the identified root causes.