zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
PERSON SPECIFICATION – Research Band 7 Specification Essential Desirable Examples Measured by Education and Training Formal qualifications and relevant training A good degree and a PhD in building services, mechanical or renewable energy engineering Recognised professional accreditation (where appropriate) A post-doctoral research fellow in building services engineering, mechanical, or renewable energy engineering Application Interview Other Work Experience Ability to undertake duties of the post Evidence of: An emerging track record in an appropriate research field, including scientific publications, presentations at scientific conferences and contributing to grant applications Has experience in proposal writing and research application, project management and researcher supervision, laboratory work, as well as computer modelling skill. Application Interview Other Skills and Knowledge Includes abilities and intellect Evidence of: An ability to communicate complex conceptual ideas to widely divergent audiences. Effective management of resources e.g. financial, equipment etc heating and power technologies Thermal fluid knowledge Laboratory skill Industry collaboration capability Knowledge: control system set-up. Effective management of research project resources Ability to motivate research teams to deliver high quality outputs Thermal knowledge Laboratory skill Industry collaboration capability Supervision capability Has good communications skills in English Control system set-up. Application Interview Personal Qualities Includes any specific physical requirements of the post – (subject to the provisions of the Equality Act 2010) An expectation to positively contribute to University activities and initiatives which may include open days, graduation ceremonies, etc., and have a willingness to undertake administrative activities Management capacity in organisation of the research project and events. Management of the reporting and deliverables Application Interview Other
PERSON SPECIFICATION – Research Band 7 Specification Essential Desirable Examples Measured by Education and Training Formal qualifications and relevant training A PhD or equivalent in relevant discipline Relevant rehabilitation background Relevant clinical qualification Application Work Experience Ability to undertake duties of the post Evidence of: An emerging track record in an appropriate research field, including scientific publications, presentations at scientific conferences and contributing to grant applications Expertise in cancer or palliative care research Expertise in health services research Evidence of collaborative working Clinical expertise in rehabilitation in cancer or palliative care Evidence of collaborations resulting in external research funding Application Interview Skills and Knowledge Includes abilities and intellect Evidence of: Participation in networks that seek to promote research collaboration Effective management of resources Expertise in the theory and application of health service qualitative research methodologies In-depth knowledge of UK healthcare Excellent written and verbal communication and presentation skills Excellent writing skills Membership of Departmental Research Committee or equivalent Contribution to the supervision of undergraduate project, masters or PhD students Application Interview
Personal Qualities Includes any specific physical requirements of the post – (subject to the provisions of the Equality Act 2010) An expectation to positively contribute to University activities and initiatives which may include open days, graduation ceremonies, etc., and have a willingness to undertake administrative activities Show evidence of collaborative working, particularly on interdisciplinary activities Evidence of working in an open and transparent way, providing information and communicating effectively with colleagues Evidence of Continuous Professional Development Application Interview
PERSON SPECIFICATION Criteria Essential Desirable How to be assessed Qualifications, knowledge and experience PhD or equivalent professional qualifications and experience in Chemistry. Detailed understanding and knowledge of materials chemistry or catalysis. Experience in materials chemistry or catalysis. Experience in X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Experience in designing in situ and operando measurements Experience in structural characterisation. Experience in heterogeneous catalysis: catalyst screening, product quantification. Track record in authoring research publications. Teaching at undergraduate level and contributing to teaching at postgraduate level CV, Publications and interview Planning and organising Able to organise own research activities to deadline and quality standards CV and interview Problem solving and initiative Able to develop understanding of complex problems and in-depth knowledge to address them Able to develop original techniques/methods. Versatility in enabling correlations between catalysts and the products. CV, publications and interview Management and teamwork Able to supervise work of junior research staff, delegating effectively Able to contribute to Academic Unit management and administrative processes Work effectively in a team, understanding the strengths and weaknesses of others to help teamwork development Fully contributing to organisation and execution lab safety protocols CV, references and interview Communicating and influencing Communicate new and complex information effectively, both verbally and in writing, engaging the interest and enthusiasm of the target audience Able to present research results at group meetings and conferences Publications, references and interview
Able to contribute to Academic Unit management and administrative processes. Work effectively in a team, understanding the strengths and weaknesses of others to help teamwork development. Communicating and influencing Effectively communicate new and complex information effectively, both verbally and in writing. Able to present research results at group meetings and conferences. Able to write up research results for publication in leading peer-reviewed journals. Work proactively with colleagues in other work areas/institutions, contributing specialist knowledge to achieve outcomes. Application, references, interview. Other skills and behaviours Enthusiasm to participate in the project and ambition to succeed. Computer literacy. Understanding of relevant Health & Safety issues. Positive attitude to colleagues and students. Application, references, interview. Special requirements Able to travel occasionally. Able to attend national and international conferences to present research results. Application, interview. JOB HAZARD ANALYSIS Is this an office-based post? Yes If this post is an office-based job with routine office hazards (e.g. use of VDU), no further information needs to be supplied. Do not complete the section below. No If this post is not or has some hazards other than routine office (e.g. more than use of VDU) please complete the analysis below. Hiring managers are asked to complete this section as accurately as possible to ensure the safety of the post-holder. ## - HR will send a full PEHQ to all applicants for this position. Please note, if full health clearance is required for a role, this will apply to all individuals, including existing members of staff. ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURES Occasionally (<30% of time) Frequently (30-60% of time) Constantly (> 60% of time) Outside work N/A Extremes of temperature (e.g. fridge/ furnace) ## Potential for exposure to body fluids N/A ## Noise (greater than 80 dba - 8 hrs twa) N/A
Qualifications, knowledge and experience PhD or equivalent professional qualifications and/or experience in group IV semiconductor processing or silicon photonics Detailed understanding semiconductor device fabrication and experience of working in a cleanroom Experience in mask design, process development and fabrication of semiconductor devices Experience in methods to visually inspect fabricated devices such as FIB, SEM, etc… Detailed understanding and knowledge of modelling techniques for photonic and electronic devices Experience in photonic and electronic device characterisation Experience in the layout software Experience in optical modulation and/or silicon photonics Application and interview Planning and organising Excellent organisational and time management skills References and interview Problem solving and initiative Able to develop understanding of complex problems and apply knowledge to address them Able to develop original techniques/methods References and interview Management and teamwork Ability to work well as part of a team References and interview Communicating and influencing Excellent written and verbal communication skills Able to present research results at group meetings and conferences Able to write up research results for publication in leading peer-viewed journals Work proactively with colleagues in ORC/ECS, industrial partners and other institutions Application and interview Other skills and behaviours Understanding of relevant Health & Safety issues Positive attitude to colleagues and students Special requirements Ability to travel and conduct research within the UK and overseas JOB HAZARD ANALYSIS Is this an post?
Experience of using costing and accountancy software packages. D AF, INT Knowledge/ Skills Understand and apply research costing principles E SS, INT Understanding of Full Economic Costing and its practical application to both costing and post-award management of grants E AF, INT Knowledge of major research funders, with the ability to apply their requirements to both the costing and post-award management of grants E AF, INT Ability to undertake and interpret financial reconciliations and take follow-on actions and provide appropriate advice E AF, INT, ST Ability to assess financial risk and take mitigating actions E SS, INT Ability to communicate effectively at all levels within the University and outside institutions E SS, INT Computer literate – integrated General Ledger systems, MS Word and Excel as a minimum. E AF, INT Excellent record keeping skills, including the maintenance of confidential records. E AF, INT Uses Standard Operating Procedures that are relevant to their post, can train others in their use and is pro-active in identifying any changes required. E AF, INT Ability to work with detail and convey complex information may be highly detailed, technical or specialist. E AF, INT Highly numerate and comfortable working with figures. E AF, INT, ST
Knowledge of the research funding opportunities available to universities, especially relating to biomedical and medical research. D AF, INT Personal Attributes Team player – Understands the wider role of individuals in the team and takes care to understand the roles and workloads of others, working with team members to achieve common goals. E AF, INT Able to work with minimum supervision, escalating issues as appropriate. E AF, INT Able to manage diverse workloads, work under pressure, prioritise and meet deadlines; E AF, INT Be customer-oriented, promote and deliver a culture of good customer service across the team. Proactively seeks to explore and understand customers’ needs to ensure a high quality of service. E AF, INT Provide input to the decision-making of others, easily and quickly discuss alternatives and implement agreed solution. Use initiative and creativity to resolve problems. E AF, INT Both persuasive and tenacious. E AF, INT Flexible and adaptable in your approach to work. E AF, INT Continually seek areas of E AF, INT Desire to be part of a team but also respond positively through having the freedom to take the initiative and make independent decisions when required. E AF, INT Key:
Biomedical Engineering – group leader Prof Stephen Wilson Magnetic Resonance Engineering MRI safety studies Superconducting magnets Applied electromagnetics Heteronuclear MRI RF and gradient pulse designs Electromagnetic analysis Magnet design Biomedical Instrumentation Accelerometry for sleep studies Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson'sDisease Needle steering Physiological control for rotary heart pumps Minimal data polysomnography Respiratory therapies Cough sound analytics Real-time diagnosis via mobile applications Biosignal Analysis Cardiac modelling Modelling the Auditory System Academics in BME Professor S J Wilson Stephen Professor Professor S Crozier Stuart Professor / Associate Dean Research, EAIT Faculty Mr L Guo Lei Postdoctoral Research Fellow Dr J Jin Jin Research Fellow Associate Professor U R Abeyratne Udantha Associate Professor Dr R Sharan Roneel Postdoctoral Research Fellow Dr V Swarnkar Vinayak Research Fellow Professor F Liu Feng Professor Dr M Li Mingyan Postdoctoral Research Fellow Dr F Tang Fangfang Postdoctoral Research Fellow Dr D Wang Deming Principal Research Fellow Dr P I Terrill Philip Senior Lecturer Dr S Chandra Shekhar Lecturer Power and Energy Systems – group leader Prof Tapan Saha electronics Transmission and distribution system analysis Fault diagnosis Renewable energy systems Transformer condition monitoring Integration of renewables into the grid grid energy systems Real-time optimisation Energy market analysis Peer-to-peer energy trading Power industry skilling and education Electric vehicles Battery storage technology
Academics in PES Professor T K Saha Tapan Professor Dr F Zare Firuz ARC Future Fellowship A/Prof M Nadarajah Mithulananthan Associate Professor Dr O Krause Olav Lecturer Dr S Hu Sijia Postdoctoral Research Fellow Dr R Sharma Rahul Lecturer Dr F Bai Feifei Postdoctoral Research Fellow Professor S Bartlett Simon Professor Dr H Ma Hui Research Fellow Dr D Martin Daniel Research Fellow Cyber Physical Systems – group leaders Prof Neil Bergmann Wireless sensor networks Wireless mesh networks Mobile and embedded computing Context-aware computing Robotics engineering Bio-inspired robotics Decision-making algorithms Control mechanisms Motion sensor technology Tele surgical medicine Navigation and collision avoidance Quad-rotor efficiency Disability support devices Academics in CPS Professor N W Bergmann Neil Chair in Embedded Systems Associate Professor P R Sutton Peter Associate Professor Associate Professor M Portmann Marius Associate Professor Dr P Pounds Paul Senior Lecturer Dr H Kurniawati Hanna Lecturer Dr S Singh Surya Senior Lecturer Professor M V Srinivasan Mandyam Professor (co-affiliation with QBI) Photonics & Microwave Engineering – group leader Prof Aleks Rakic Communications & Signal Processing
Person Specification Qualifications and Professional Memberships Professionally qualified with a relevant degree/postgraduate qualification, plus broad demonstrable management experience in a systems or information-related field, or similar/ related roles Or: Substantial vocational and relevant management experience, demonstrating management ability in an appropriate professional or specialist area, and success in similar or related roles, supported by evidence of significant appropriate specialist knowledge. E Educated to degree level E Technical Competencies (Experience and Knowledge) Desirable 1-3 Strong relationship management and communication skills, both written and verbal, developed from experience gained in a first or second line support role, meeting the needs of a diverse customer base E 3 Excellent IT skills and strong capability with practical experience of developing, configuring, supporting and maintaining an IT systems solution E 3 Well-developed knowledge and understanding of the full systems project lifecycle, including the roles, responsibilities and route to delivery of a successful implementation project E 2 Experience of using complex information systems to provide analysis and reports for informed and non-expert audiences E 2 Experience of successful change management programmes involving a variety of stakeholders E 2 Experience of implementing a Research Information system and knowledge of the work practices, processes and procedures involved in project management of this scale. D n/a Knowledge of Higher Education research information requirements D n/a Special Requirements: Essential/ Desirable Ability to work outside of regular office hours as required E Core Competencies Level 1-3 Communication Adaptability / Flexibility Customer/Client service and support Planning and Organising Continuous Improvement Problem Solving and Decision Making Skills Managing and Developing Performance Creative and Analytical Thinking Influencing, Persuasion and Negotiation Skills Strategic Thinking & Leadership 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 1
If ‘No’, please note that your application will not be submitted for review until CIMA receives written confirmation that your university has reviewed and agreed with the contract clauses. SUBMIT Once you have completed all of the sections in this form, please return this document, and only this document to . CHECKLIST
Risk/Benefit Are the risks to subjects in this research no more than minimal? Yes No Minimal risk means that the probability and magnitude of harm or discomfort anticipated in the research are not greater in and of themselves than those ordinarily encountered in daily life or during the performance of routine physical or psychological examinations or tests. Indicate if the research includes any of the following (check all that apply): Interactions with subjects Interventions or procedures (for the research) Manipulations of the subjects’ environment Observation of subjects Deception Review of private information or records Review of mental health records Review of psychotherapy notes or records If the research involves greater than minimal risk to subjects, does the research offer the prospect of direct benefits to the individual subjects? Yes No NA If yes, describe: Consent Is a waiver of consent being sought for some or all subjects? Yes. Complete Supplement E to request a waiver of consent. No. Answer the following: Describe the procedures to be used to determine the individual subject’s capacity to provide consent (e.g., assessment by Principal Investigator, evaluation by independent practitioner, use of University of California San Diego Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC), use of MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research (MacCAT-CR), etc.): NOTE: Unless obvious (e.g. person is unconscious), the decision-making capacity of individual subjects should not be assumed because of a condition or diagnosis. When at risk for impaired decision making capacity or when capacity is in question, the capacity of individual subjects to provide consent for research should be determined through the use of a standardized measure or evaluation by a qualified professional. When it has been determined that a subject lacks the capacity to provide consent: Describe who may provide surrogate consent and how their qualification to do so will be determined (i.e., who may serve as Legally Authorized Representative
Aviation Multi-modal & Inter-modal Freight Public/Mass Transit Ports and Waterways Railroads Airport Commercial Vehicles Bicycles Bridges & Structures Structures Management Structural Design & Analysis Structural Materials Bridge Rails & Transitions Geotechnical Issues High Mast Illumination Hydraulics & Hydrology Overhead Sign Bridges Structures Construction Traffic & Safety Geometric Design Signal Operations Pavement Marking Railroad Crossing Safety Roadside Safety Roadway Signing & Delineation Traffic Control Devices Traffic Management & Operations Work Zone Safety Lighting Maintenance Operations & Security Vegetation Management Rest Winter Operations Pavement Maintenance Maintenance Contracting Emergency Management Pavement Preservation Policy & Planning Right of Way Planning, Acquisition & Management Statewide Regional & Local Transportation System Planning Roadway Planning Traffic Data Collection Twin Cities Mobility Modal Plans Environmental Cultural Resources Social and Economic Issues & Impacts Noise Analysis Erosion Control Wetlands Air & Water Quality Contaminated Properties Regulated Materials & Forestry Wetlands Wildlife & Fisheries Materials & Construction Geotechnical Pavement Design Construction Materials Construction Operations Innovative Contracting Pavement Management Administrative (Research Administration and Support) Work Assignments Once the Master Contracts are established, Mn/DOT will assign all work in the form of written Work Contracts. These Work Order Contracts will define the scope of work, the schedule and any other special conditions. The Work Order Contract must be fully executed by both Mn/DOT and the successful responder prior to beginning any work. Colleges and Universities will be asked to respond to a problem statement(s) generated by Mn/DOT or other parties. The problem statements will identify research issues for which the successful responder may develop research proposals. Responses to problem statements will be required to include an estimated budget and schedule. Proposed costs will be a significant factor in the award of Work Order Contracts. Research proposals addressing the problem statements will be reviewed by Mn/DOT, which will have the sole authority to determine those proposals to be funded. The need statement author will recommend which proposal(s) best met the intent of work being proposed. These recommendations are forwarded to the governing boards: Transportation Research Innovation Group (TRIG) and Local Road Research Board (LRRB) for review and consideration. The Mn/DOT Specialty Offices and Districts weigh in and provide recommendations to the governing boards on their high priority needs. The proposals are shortlisted by governing boards. From these proposals, the Principal Investigator is asked to provide a brief presentation and address any questions. The principal investigator may be asked to present to both governing boards if both are interested in funding the
Ø Exploratory Factor analysis was used to explore the CSFs, CFFs and to validate the survey instruments (questionnaires). It was also used to identify the damnations for the customized survey instruments in order to facilitate its standardization process in future research. TABLE 4: CRITICAL FAILURE FACTORS FAILURE FACTORS MEAN STANDARD DEVIATION POOR CONSULTANT EFFECTIVENESS 4.57 0.49757 POOR BRP QUALITY 4.46 0.50342 POOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT’ 4.53 0.49765 POOR ERP PACKAGE SELECTION 4.57 0.50987 HIGH TURNOVER RATE OF PROJECT MEMBERS 4.36 0.49348 OVER RELIANCE ON HEAVY CUSTOMIZATION 4.46 0.50987 POOR IT INFRASTRUCTURE 4.46 0.49005 POOR KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER 4.54 0.50787 UNCLEAR CONCEPT OF ERP BY THE USER 4.40 UNREALISTIC EXPECTATIONS 4.61 0.49005 HASTY PROJECT SCHEDULE 4.50 0.50213 USER RESISTANCE TO CHANGE 4.51 0.50547 POOR TOP MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 4.67 0.49008 POOR SYSTEM TESTING 4.63 0.47243 LACK OF FORMAL COMMUNICATION 4.54 SOFTWARE MODIFICATION 4.60 0.50435 LACK OF FORMAL COMMUNICATION 4.43 0.50078 SOFTWARE MODIFICATION 4.52 0.49875 INFORMAL STRATEGY 4.59 0.50878 PART TIME DEDICATION 4.53 0.49213 FUNCTIONALITY PROBLEMS WITH THE SYSTEM 4.61 0.49712 COST OVER RUNS 4.51 0.50534
1 Developing 2 Proficient 3 Advanced Development: Choosing relevant research and thoroughly answering research questions. Response addresses at least one research question, citing evidence from at least one source. Research is somewhat relevant and is clearly explained. Response addresses all research questions, citing evidence from at least two sources. Research is mostly relevant and supports inferences. Response addresses all research questions thoroughly, citing evidence from at least three sources. Research is relevant and supports inferences and analysis. Quoting and Paraphrasing: Including a balance of quotes and effective paraphrasing. Response includes some paraphrasing and direct quotes. Paraphrases and quotes demonstrate a limited understanding of the research. Response includes a balance of paraphrasing and direct quotes when necessary. Paraphrases and quotes demonstrate an understanding of the research. Response includes a balance of effective paraphrasing and well-chosen direct quotes when necessary. Paraphrases and quotes demonstrate a thorough understanding of the research. Citations: Including enough citations to make it completely clear where information is coming from. Response includes either parenthetical citations or leads. An attempt has been made to show where information comes from. Response includes either parenthetical citations or leads, which match the works cited. Citations are used to show where information comes from. Response includes a mix of parenthetical citations as well as leads, which match the works cited. Citations are used to clearly show where information comes from.
PERSON SPECIFICATION - Research Nurse Specification Essential Desirable Examples Measured by Education and Training Formal qualifications and relevant training First level registration Computer literate Evidence of continuing professional development ECDL Competent in research PC programmes (Access, Excel etc.) Application Interview Other Work Experience Ability to undertake duties of the post years’ experience in nursing Research or clinical experience in chronic medical conditions or oncology. One year’s experience in oncology and/or advanced non-malignant disease or a related subject. Experience as research nurse Application Interview Other Skills and Knowledge Includes abilities and intellect Excellent interpersonal skills Understanding of research methodology and principles Understanding of the governance and ethics of research Excellent written and presentational skills Involvement in professional and staff development Member of special interest group/network Evidence of previous research involvement. Experience of qualitative interviewing as a means of data collection Application Interview Other
PERSON SPECIFICATION - Research Specification Essential Desirable Examples Measured by Education and Training Formal qualifications and relevant training level registration Evidence of continuing professional development Application Work Experience Ability to undertake duties of the post Substantial experience in nursing Research or clinical experience in community nursing team One year’s experience in oncology and/or advanced non-malignant disease or a related subject. Experience as research nurse Application Interview Skills and Knowledge Includes abilities and intellect Excellent interpersonal skills Understanding of the governance and ethics of research Member of special interest group/network Evidence of previous research involvement. Experience of taking consent Knowledge of research regulation and UK law. Competent in research PC programmes (Access, Excel etc.) Application Interview Personal Skills Excellent communication skills Ability to facilitate collaborative working Capacity to adapt to change
Ability to make decisions, organise and prioritise Ability to work with minimal supervision in the and community setting Excellent organisational skills Personal Qualities Includes any specific physical requirements of the post – (subject to the provisions of the Equality Act 2010) Confident Articulate Ability to commute between various sites Ability to work flexible hours to meet service needs Application Interview Other
Name:______________________ Rubric 1 2 3/3+ 4/4+ Working Below Approaching Meeting Excelling Information Collection Lack of relevant, important information gathered for this topic Student has carefully determined relevant and important information from various sources Writing Process Many steps of the writing process weren’t followed for this assignment Clear evidence that student followed all steps of the writing process (brainstorming, rough draft, careful editing, final copy) Finished Product Follows Format Finished product does not follow the format provided Finished product clearly includes all components required Conventions Several conventions errors makes finished product difficult for the reader to navigate Finished product is free of conventions errors Total Mark Comments:
Type of Research based on Research goal (Mark what is most appropriate for your research. It is allowed to mark multiple options simultaneously) Type of Research □ research targeting theory: □ research targeting policy: □ research targeting practice: □ namely: □ doctorate □ project based research □ other, namely: □ policy preparative / - supportive research □ policy evaluative research □ other, namely: □ practice preparative / - supportive research □ practice evaluative research □ namely: Methodological characteristics (Mark what is most appropriate for your research. It is allowed to mark multiple options simultaneously) Nature of Methods □ quantitative □ qualitative □ literature study/ document analysis □ other, namely: Fill in this section with the type of method (for example; in-depth interviews, survey research, etc.): Time and Place ► Time: ► Place (range): □ one particular moment in □ long period / longitudinal research (retrospective and prospective research included) □ local □ regional □ national □ international Collection of data □ face-to-face □ pen and paper □ by telephone □ online □ other, namely: □ not applicable Research units □ individuals, namely: □ files / documents □ organisations □ processes □ other, namely: □ directly involved, children □ directly involved, adults □ intermediate persons Key terms (will be assigned by KeKi)
For database of awards and fellowships Awards/ Fellowship Type of award, given in which year and awarding organisation and how it was obtained S N Awards/Fellowship Year Awarding organization [ academic body, National award by Govt of India, State award How it was obtained [ examination, nomination] 1. PDCC in pain management 2010 BHU By examination STS projects by Under Graduates S N Title of project Name of the candidate Role (Guide/Co-Guide) Year (s) 1 Delay in open fracture surgery-An analysis of patient and hospital specific factors in a tertiary level hospital in India Arushi Aggarwal 2018
Although there are many who support school uniforms, people also disagree with the idea. Two reasons people are not in favor of schools requiring students to wear school uniforms is because they take away the individuality of the student and they do not allow each student to express his or her interest. (Here is where you will further explain what you mean by these explain them, don’t just mention them or “list” them) Then you will go on to say: According to source ABC, “blah, blah, blah.” This means that “yada, yada, yada.” This idea supports the counterclaim because “yippy, dippy, doo.” Another source, XYZ, shows that, “blah, blah, blah.” Even though this idea is different from mine, it supports the counterclaim because “123.” ***** So how many direct pieces of information do I need in total to support the counterclaim? ________________ A strong conclusion, which does not introduce ANY NEW INFORMATION. Your conclusion should wrap up your paper nicely—it should summarize the big ideas in the paper without repeating exactly what it is you already mentioned. thoroughly
Guidelines for the Your essay should be typed as you would type any essay: black ink, size 12 Times New Roman, Arial, or Calibri font (or another approved font) with an MLA heading and header. You should include a Works Cited page at the end of the paper; remember, the Works Cited page is a part of the paper and should be treated as such. We will go over the format for this list in class. The directions are found in chapter 5 of your MLA. Your paper must also contain at least two direct quotations. DUE DATES and POINT VALUES Assignment Monday 1/12 Research question and proposal 13 Wednesday 1/21 or Thursday 1/22 Preliminary/Working Outline 32 WHEN FINAL DRAFT IS SUBMITTED Note and Source cards/ research pages 35 Wednesday 1/28 or Thursday 1/29 1st PEER EDIT – COMPLETE DUE with Works Cited page- 40 WHEN FINAL DRAFT IS SUBMITTED Rough/first draft Friday 2/6 Final Draft [This is the final day for accepting papers!] 110 Total Score /230 *If you are going to be absent on the day the paper is due, you must submit your paper early. No late papers will be accepted (except in the case of serious illness, personal injury, or a death in the family) Remember to check Appendix R for the rubric for each assignment BEFORE you turn it in!
Anxiety and Sleep Disorders, Prevent Memory Loss Due to Aging, Boost the Immune System, Cure Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy Sermorelin 2mg per vial R250.00 Clinical Test Expectation - Human Subjects Miracle Skin tone improvements Improves sleep Strengthen immune system Anti SNAP-8 (Acetyl Glutamyl Heptapeptide-1) 10mg per vial R350.00 Clinical Test Expectation - Human Subjects Anti-aging Anti-wrinkle TB500 (Thyomosin Beta 4) 2mg per vial R300.00 Clinical Test Expectation - Subjects Hair growth Reduce inflammation and pain Healing of acute or chronic injury Tesamorelin 2mg per vial R300.00 Clinical Test Expectation - Human Subjects Reduce Belly Fat Thymalin (Thymus) 10mg per vial R800.00 Clinical Test Expectation - Human Subjects Immune Deficiencies, restores the integrity of thymic activity in a dysfunctional or diseased thymus
Tablet | Capsule Product & Price per unit Image Ladies / Men Rapid Fat Loss The Little Pink Pill 1 Bottle - 30capsules - 1 months supply R500-00 Clinical Test Expectation - Human Subjects : Combats obesity - Fat Burner - Thyroid repair - Reduce appetite - Increase metabolism SARMS Product & Price per unit Image Ibutamoren Mesylate (MK-677) Price per 50 Capsules -10mg - R670-00 Price per 50 Capsules -20mg - R1260-00 Price per 50 Capsules -30mg - R1890-00 per 50 Capsules - 40mg - R2520-00 Price per 50 Capsules - 50mg - R3150-00 Ligandrol / Anabolicum (LGD-4033) per 50 Capsules -10mg – R520-00 Price per 50 Capsules -20mg – R756-00 Price per 50 Capsules -30mg – R1134-00 Price per 50 Capsules - 40mg – R1512-00 Price per 50 Capsules - 50mg – R1890-00 Stenabolic (SR9009) Price per 50 Capsules -10mg – R756-00 Price per 50 Capsules -20mg – R1428-00 Price per 50 Capsules -30mg – R2142-00 Price per 50 Capsules - 40mg – R2856-00 per 50 Capsules - 50mg – R3570-00 Testalone (RAD-140) Price per 50 Capsules -10mg – R756-00 Price per 50 Capsules -20mg – R1470-00 Price per 50 Capsules -30mg – R2205-00 Price per 50 Capsules - 40mg – R2940-00
Investigator’s position/title: Signature of Faculty Sponsor Required for non-faculty investigators (i.e. students, fellows, employees, etc.) Date FOR ADMIN USE ONLY DATA/INFORMATION REQUEST APPROVAL This research preparation application has been reviewed and approved by: IRB Director or Administrator: Signature:______________________________________________ Date: ______________ **RGE Director: Signature:______________________________________________ Date: ______________ **Required for access to UPDB records. Original: Kept by the approving individual/office Copies sent to: (1) Signing Investigator (2) Enterprise Data Warehouse Officials, if applicable
Research Project Cooperation Application Form Items with * are Compulsory Salutation(use Bold on the circle to indicate): oPhD oDr. oAssociate Prof. oProf. *Country: *Your ID Photo Here *First Name: *Middle Name: *Last Name: Institute/Affiliation: Department: *Email: *Date of Birth: Postal Address and Contact Number: *h-index on Google Scholar: *h-index on Scopus: *Number of publications:
Application Date : Study Team: Primary Investigator (PI): Co-Investigators: Study nurse/ Coordinator: (if applicable) Institution and Department: Contact details primary investigator (lead study center): Street: Postal Code: City: Country: State (for US addresses): Email: Phone: Additional study centers: Overview: Study Title: Rationale of study: (what is the reason for performing this study?) Study hypothesis: (Formulate only one hypothesis) Type of study: In vitro / Bench test Animal study Clinical study Case series design: (in case of a clinical Prospective Controlled Randomized Retrospective Single-arm (single cohort) Non-randomized Field: Implants Prosthetics Other: Regenerative CAD/CAM Number of patients /animals/samples Total: Per group: Sample size calculation: (if applicable) Calculated number (without drop-outs): Rationale: Study Device (Product Name): Control Device (Product Name):
RESEARCH PROPOSAL POSTER SESSION FOREST ECOSYSTEMS AND SOCIETY First-year Graduate Student Proposed Research Posters April 2013 Poster size: smallest dimension not more than 36” if using Student Multimedia Services (oregonstate.edu/is/mediaservices) Poster Content: Title and Presenter – Include your name, email contact and major professor Research Question: State the general question your research will address Background – Briefly put your research into context with regards to current knowledge on the topic and the importance of your question Specific Questions and assumptions: State one or more specific questions to be addressed by the methods described below. These can be stated as postulates, succinct questions or hypotheses. – Note that these are NOT statistical hypotheses. State (non-null) scientific hypotheses. List the critical axioms or assumptions. Methods – Describe the approach you will use to address each specific questions – give your response variable(s) and any explanatory variables, describe how the data are (or were) to be collected, study design (e.g., observational, survey, experiment), sampling plan and suggested analysis method. This is a minor part of the poster because it may not be well-developed at this point. But if you have ideas for it you should include them. Interpretation – Provide the of inference. Provide the expected outcomes for your scientific hypotheses. Explain how the data you collect would ‘look’ in order to be interpreted relative to answering the specific question you posed above. Importance – Explain how your thesis work will provide a significant contribution to the body of knowledge in your field. Suggested Process: Discuss the proposed research with your major professor and make sure you are in agreement with regards to the specific questions, assumptions, methods and interpretation. Develop a rough draft of your poster (reduced scale) and have it reviewed by your major professor and others who might provide useful feedback. Print a draft copy of the final poster on 11x17 paper before producing a full scale version. Have this reviewed by fellow students. Go to Student Multimedia Services (Valley Library, 2nd floor) to produce the final version. DO NOT PROCRASTINATE! Leave plenty of time to work out the wrinkles. Note the time to produce the poster that the Student Media Services requires as well.
STUDY INVESTIGATORS: Contact Details Principal Investigator: Institution: Department: Address: Tel. Email: Co-Investigator: Institution: Department: Address: Tel. Co-Investigator: Institution: Department: Address: Tel. Email: Co-Investigator: Institution: Department: Address: Tel. Email: Co-Investigator: Institution: Department: Address: Tel. Email:
Research Protocol English Principal Contacted Email 2.1 Co-investigator Contacted ……… 2.2 Co-investigator (No.2):……………………………………………………………………………………
Hypothetical AmeriCorps Health Literacy Program Description A disproportionate number of socioeconomic and minority groups in an urban region of the state have difficulty understanding and acting upon health information. This issue has negative implications on residents’ healthcare access, costs, quality, and safety. To combat the growing problem of health illiteracy in the county, an AmeriCorps program was created to improve the health literacy and ultimately the health and wellness status and quality of life for residents in the area. The program’s core components consist of developing and disseminating health and safety information, conduct a series of health literacy workshops, and provide individualized health literacy sessions. Program Logic Model Project Resources Core Project Components Evidence of Project Implementation and Participation Evidence of Change INPUTS ACTIVITIES OUTPUTS Outcomes Short-Term Medium-Term Long-Term What we invest (# and type of AmeriCorps members) What we do Direct products from program activities Changes in knowledge, skills, attitudes, opinions Changes in behavior or action that result from participants’ new knowledge Meaningful changes, often in their condition or status in life Funding 4 FT staff 100 AmeriCorps members serve as health care advisors 10 partnerships with organizations Member training Develop and disseminate accurate, accessible, and actionable health and safety information Conduct health literacy workshops Provide individualized health literacy sessions 500 health and safety education materials disseminated 4 half-day workshop sessions (at 20 residents per session; 80 total) 100 individual and group health literacy sessions (60 mins each) serving 300 people Increase in residents’ understanding of prevention and self-management of conditions Increase in residents’ motivation to adopt good health practices Increase in residents ability to search for and use health information Increase in residents’ adoption of healthy behaviors and recommendations of the program (such as getting necessary medical tests) Improved health and wellness status and quality of life for residents in the area
Ongoing projects Blaauw R. Prevalence and impact of hospital malnutrition on associated outcomes. Ethics Approval number: N14/06/061. Blaauw R. Plasma glutamine levels in relation to ICU patient outcome. Ethics Approval number: N14/08/114. Blaauw R, du Plessis LM, Daniels LC, Smit Y, van Niekerk E. Investigating Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviour of Adolescents in the School Environment. Ethics Approval number: N16/08/100. Visser J, Blaauw R, Cederholm, T. Addressing malnutrition in hospitalised adults: a South African perspective. Visser J, Blaauw R, Visser, W. Determinants of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in adults in the Western Cape Province of South Africa. Shabangu SV, Beukes R. Management of Severe Acute Malnutrition in children aged 6 - 59 months by Professional Nurses in Primary Health Care Facilities in Johannesburg Health District, South Africa. Kimani IW, Beukes R. Evaluation of the Supplementary Feeding programme targeted at moderately malnourished children aged 6 to 59 months in Baringo County, Kenya. (Data collection completed. Thesis in first stage of writing) Mbhenyane XG, Mandiwana TC, Mbhatsani HV, Mushaphi LF, Mabapa NS, Motadi SA, Mabasa E, Masia TA. The impact of BFHI on breastfeeding practices by Women in Mopani and Vhembe districts, Limpopo, South Africa. Mabapa NS, Mbhatsani HV, Mbhenyane XG, Mandiwana TC, Mushapi LF, Motadi SA, Mabasa E, Masia TA. Determination of eating patterns, cultural perspectives, household food security, physical activity and health risk in Limpopo. Mbhenyane XG, Makuse SHN, Mushaphi LF, Dlamini N. Improving food and nutrition security, nutritional and health status of rural communities.
Clinical Research Study: Date: Principal Investigator: PI Contact/Requestor: Email: Phone: Study Duration: Definitions: For the purpose of this document the term “Study” refers to clinical trials, clinical studies or other research related activities. The term “Technology” refers to any computing system, device or application that process or stores information (e.g. computer applications, computers, servers, mobile devices and clinical devices), that is provided by the Study sponsor for use in the Study. Study Description: General Technology 1. Does the Study require the use of data center servers to be located at UCDHS? (either existing or a new server implementation) 2. Does the require a Technology dependency with any UCDHS production information system (e.g., Epic, Clarity, labs, radiology, pharmacy, etc.)? Security 3. Is unencrypted PII/PHI stored or processed on/by the propose Technology or elsewhere? Note: if yes please describe (within the Study Description above) the encryption algorithm and bit strength to be used. 4. Is PII/PHI stored/transmitted to an outside party (outside of UCDHS)? 5. Is there a requirement for removable media (e.g., flash/thumb drives, CD/DVDs, external hard drives, etc.) between UCDHS laptops/desktops and the proposed Technology? Networking 6. Will the Technology need to connect to any UCDHS wired or wireless networks? (All exceptions for Guest wireless Study use will be considered on a case-by-case basis) 7. Will the Technology require customer or vendor provided Wi-Fi networks (“hotspot”) or other networking requirements/equipment not provided and supported by UCDHS? Clinical Engineering Note: Clinical Engineering requires a separate review for clinical devices.
B. Research Safety training: contact: C. Formaldehyde Training: contact: D. Cyanide Training: contact: E. Radiation Training: contact: F. VA IACUC (animal) Training: ; contact G. Human Subject Protection Education: ; contact Jacqueline.Charles@va.gov H. Venipuncture: contact Contact Information current as of February 24,2018 Contact VA Research Office VA 216-791-3800, ext 4660 for updates.
(c) describes findings in relation to the research aims (c) describes findings in relation to the research aims discussion log/reflective journal of practical ability witness evidence discussion This list is not exhaustive and appropriate assessment methods may be used. 3.b How to use an accepted method of referencing for source material Learners should describe how to use an accepted method of referencing for source material. 4 The learner will know how to evaluate a piece of research The learner must know: Assessment Requirements Evidence Location 4.a The process for evaluating the outcomes of research Learners should describe the process for evaluating the outcomes of research. The following assessment methods can be used in the assessment of this standard: tasks/questions and answers questions and answers
Research Sponsorship Application for Projects Requiring Approval by NHS Ethics Committee and Involving Research on Human Subjects, their tissues, organs or data, by Staff and/or Students of Loughborough University The project must not commence until insurance, ethics approval and sponsorship are obtained PART A - PLEASE COMPLETE ALL QUESTIONS 1. Title of Study: Start date: (dd/MM/yyyy) End date: (dd/MM/yyyy) Researcher’s Details 2. Title: Mr/Mrs/Miss/Ms/Professor/Dr School: Department: Address: Tel: Email 3. Are student researchers involved with this project? Yes No 4. Is the study based solely on questionnaires, or other research not involving invasive techniques or medicinal products? Yes No 5. Please estimate numbers of volunteers participating in the study: Adults Minors * Patients Healthy human volunteers * Minors under 18 years of age Is this a Multi Centre Trial? Yes No If yes and the trial is to be sponsored by LU or managed by LU, please estimate numbers of volunteers participating in the study overall: Adults Minors Patients Healthy human volunteers 6. Does the study involve invasive techniques? Yes No 7. Does the study involve the use of a medicinal product or the testing of a medical device? Yes No IF AN INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINAL PRODUCT IS INVOLVED Please indicate which phase category the study falls into Phase 1, 2, 3, 4 8. Who is the Funder? Will any part of this take place outside the UK? Yes No If Yes, in which country(ies)?
From To Schools / Institutions / Universities attended Qualifications Obtained (e.g. Honours Degree) Languages (Please state languages and proficiency level i.e. excellent, good, fair, poor) Written : Spoken : 5. EMPLOYMENT HISTORY (Please list in chronological order & provide documentary evidence wherever applicable) Dates Position held Organisation’s / Employer’s Name and Address Last Drawn Basic Monthly Salary Reason for Leaving Service From To 6. CHARACTER REFEREES (Name 3 persons who are not your relatives) Name Occupation Years known Address / Tel Contact / Address 7. OTHER INFORMATION Please answer the following questions. If the answer is 'Yes' to any of the items below, please give details on a separate sheet of paper. a Have you any criminal record? Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No b Have you ever been dismissed, discharged or suspended from employment? c Have you ever had, or are you suffering from any: - physical impairment? - disease? - mental illness? Yes No d Are you currently serving a bond or a moral obligatory service? Yes Yes No No e Do you have any relative or friend presently working in the University? If yes, please state his/her name, relationship and department:______________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ 8. PRIVACY STATEMENT