zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Compresor de camp jud. Sibiu înscris in CF nr. 1951 a com. Brădeni, nr. top 3224/2 0910 - Compresor de camp Beia Sat Beia, com. Cata, jud. Brasov Contr. 9/23.11.2006 0910 - Sectia de interventii, reparatii capitale La sonde Medias Mun. Medias, Str. Garii nr. 7, jud. Sibiu Contract de concesiune nr.7/23.9.1994 , CF 104961, top 5105/6/1 Contract de concesiune nr.7/23.9.1995 , CF 104959, top 5171/1/1 0910 4520 3600 3831 3832 4399 5210 6120 7112 150 Atelier de interventii, reparatii capitale La sonde Craiova Craiova, Str. Teilor nr. 116, jud. Dolj Inscris CF 211609, CAD 17653 0910 3600 3831 3832 4399 4520 5210 6120 7112 30
political support from within the EC. This affects directly the perception of TUs as important actors to be supported. Therefore, the secretariat will keep liaising with the EC officials to advocacy the importance of social dialogue in development. In this respect, the research plan on social dialogue (see below) will be proposed. Some recommendations were provided by participants to improve future funding proposals by unions: Collect more data from project implementers and adapt trade union language to the funders’ language, despite the fact that funders do not seem to understand the reality on the ground in the South or social dialogue. Anticipate call for proposals. Start working on them before they are open. Build relationships with funders for better chances of success and to receive early warnings on future calls. To work on the rights budget line of the EU. For this particular issue, the secretariat highlighted that it should increase its capacity (in terms of human resources) in order to be able to enlarge the scope of the work. Increased capacity will result also in better coherence amongst trade unions themselves and within the ITUC, and therefore organisations are invited to raise this point also in the GC of the ITUC. For the moment, meetings in West Africa are postponed and alternatives are being considered. Global Action Plan: Post 2015 Before the end of 2015, TUDCN and ILO ACTRAV will try to organise an expert meeting to study indicators for the post 2015 framework & to develop better more concrete advocacy proposals. HRBA and The TUDCN will be in charge of developing a study (in the context of the CPDE) on how to increase the accountability of multinational companies when they receive public money for development projects. The outcome will be an advocacy tool for the whole of TUs and CSOs. See Terms of reference on the web site. Global Governance The TUDCN should define a position on global governance. This will need to be conceived in coordination with ACTRAV and also with other prominent CSOs. To this end a ‘brainstorming’ seminar will be organised in 2015. See background note on the web site.
Fig. Layout Of DTPS Parts Of DTPS Coal Handling Plant ( CHP ) Boiler Turbine Reheater Superheater Turbo-Separator De-superheater Coal Mill Air Preheater Electrostatic Precipitator Ash Handling Plant Fuel-Oil Handling Plant Sulphur Treatment Compressor House
Report of Concern Child’s Name: Date of Birth: Kindergarten: Date of concern/ disclosure: Parent name and full address: relationship to child) Parent name and full address: (State relationship to child) Concern: Description of events: NOTES Action: Name and Signature: Date: Position: Contact email/phone:
a unit consists of more than one assessment component, please specify the weighting of the assessment component (of the whole unit) alleged to contain plagiarism:- …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. If the penalty involved the student being denied credit for a unit or other assessment, when would the next routine opportunity to re-sit/re-submit arise? Please be aware that the Discipline Committee has power to refuse the right of a taught student to re-sit an exam. For now please mark the assignment but return the grades as DE (deferred):- Please outline any specific implications or consequences of the above action for this student: If you need guidance in completing any sections of this form, please contact Emma (ext 21290, email: ) or Sally Sutton (ext 29622, email: ) PART C: Checklist of Additional Information required for Discipline Hearing (Use of unfair means cases only). It is important to check the accuracy of any facts reported. Have you enclosed a copy of the course/Departmental student handbook? YES/NO (This would normally be the one made available to the student for the year they first registered on their current programme of study.) How did the department ensure the student read the handbook? Please give a brief summary of the course content, details of any placements, and any other details which you may feel are relevant to the case.
Annual Review Meeting Report Current setting/school/college Date of current Education, Health and Care (EHC) Plan Date of last Annual Review meeting Date of this Annual Review Type of Review Please tick Normal Annual Review Transitional Annual Review (moving between the education phases) CHILD/YOUNG PERSON’S AND PARENT/CARERS’ DETAILS Child/young person’s full name Ethnicity Preferred Name Home language Date of birth Unique Pupil No (UPN). Home address National Curriculum Year Group Is the child/young person in their chronological year group? Y/N Contact phone number Is the child/young person eligible for pupil premium Y/N Email address (if over 16) Communication requirements – what is the best way to communicate with the young person to engage them in decision making? Name of parent/carers Address (if different from above) Contact numbers address Is child/young person Looked After Y/N Name of Social Worker and contact details
Rate the Teaching and Learning of your institution on the of the following standards by assigning an assessment value (0, 1, 2, 3, or 4) 0 = POOR 1 = INSUFFICIENT 2 = SATISFACTORY 3 = GOOD 4 = EXCELLENT Reference Point Standard for Quality Rating Assessment Value KNUST AQRM TEAM 12.4.1 The institution encourages and rewards teaching and learning innovation. 4 4 12.4.2 The institution has procedures in place to support the induction to teaching, pedagogy, counseling and the upgrading of staff teaching and learning skills through continuing education and lifelong learning. 4 4 12.4.3 Students have sufficient opportunity to engage with staff members in small groups, individually or via electronic platforms. 3 3 12.4.4 Student: staff ratios and academic staff average workloads are in line with acceptable norms for the particular mode of delivery, and are such that the necessary student feedback can be provided. 3 2 12.4.5 The institution has policies/procedures in place to inform the development, implementation and assessment of programmes offered by the institution and 4 4
Governance and Management 3.9 3.7 Infrastructure 3.0 2.6 Finances 3.3 3.3 Teaching and Learning 3.8 3.4 Research, Publication and Innovation 3.7 3.3 Societal Engagement 3.6 3.0 Total 21.3 19.3 Rating Score = 21.3 = 3.55 6 3.55 - Rating Score = 19.3 = 3.2 6 - 3.2 Specification of Quality Rating Rating less than 1.0  POOR Quality Rating score between 1.0 and 1.99  INSUFFICIENT Quality Rating score between 2.0 and 2.79  SATISFACTORY Quality Rating score between 2.8 and 3.5  GOOD Quality Rating score greater than 3.5  EXCELLENT Quality Overall quality at institutional is rated as EXCELLENT GOOD African Quality Rating Mechanism Validation at Programme level
Tracer studies. Recommendations: Lecturer/student ratio should be improved. More research and consultancy should be encouraged and facilitated. Direct Tracer studies should be conducted and documented, and broadened to graduates abroad. SUMMARY AT PROGRAMME LEVEL Rating Summary at Programme Major Standard Aggregated Value Programme Planning and Management 3.75 3.4 Curriculum Development 3.71 3.30 Teaching and Learning 4.00 3.33 Assessment 3.83 3.58 Programme Results 3.75 2.63 Total 19.04 16.24 Rating Score = Total Aggregated Value = 19.04 5 3.80 - Rating Score = Total Aggregated Value = 16.24 5 - 3.25
Action items Action Lead(s) Due Date Finalize harmonization document to address issues related to mandatory elements of the schema Dellis/Alessandrini/Kebbab May 5, 2017 Finalize product description proposal for presentation to the Standards Committee Horn April 28, 2017 Members to provide comments on the proposed criteria for evaluation of the ASYCUDA system PTC April 21, 2017
involved in University Examinations, but are always expected to consider very carefully the factors that affected the candidate’s performance on the relevant examination dates, and to determine whether those factors are likely to have affected the overall classification to the extent that it should be amended in all the circumstances. Have the examiners considered the candidate’s performance in the light of the material provided in the application for consideration of factors affecting performance? How have the factors been considered? Summary of action taken (the following are examples of some of the actions that might be taken. Boards may decide to do one, some, or none of these actions.) Paper(s) disregarded Specify paper(s) Mark for finalised on basis of work completed not work required Specify paper(s) Classification/final outcome requirements reviewed Comments Other action (Please specify) Does the application need to be passed to the final results/classification meeting? Recommendation to future examiners Reasons for action (if no action taken, please record this and state reason.) Section completed by Date
Cluster Communication Leads LASL North x 11 LASL South x 8 LASL West x 11 Teaching Schools x 9 The Future We are all CASL - our governors, staff, parents and pupils. Together we can communicate what CASL and the LASLs are continuing to develop. Confidently we can convey that in Cumbria a self-improving education system is in place and is` moving forward for the benefit of all Cumbria children, in all schools, academies, colleges or other settings. We are ahead of the game, in terms of the recent Education White Paper. There has never been a more important time for us to embrace message: “If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, go together” (African Proverb) We do hope that as many Headteachers and Chair of Governors will be able to attend the CASL Conference on Tuesday, 14 June 2016, where we can continue our journey together in the interests of all children, and young people in Cumbria. Details of how to secure your place are attached. Lorrayne Hughes, Chair of CASL Liz Moffatt, Strategic Development Officer Steve Wilkinson, Vicki Hepburn-Fish & Chris Wilkins – LASL Chairs Dale Hill, Senior Manager – Learning Improvement
Individuals: Believe performance is OK. Feedback of performance data. Individuals: Cannot remember. Checklists, reminders. Team: Individuals vary in how work is done. Develop standard work processes. Workload: Not enough time. Reallocate roles and work, review work priorities. Suppliers: Problems with provided information/materials. Work with suppliers to address problems there. 13. What were the primary underlying/root causes for the problem(s) at baseline that the project can address? 14. What intervention(s) addressed this cause? 15. Who was involved in carrying out each intervention? (List the professions/roles involved.) Note: If additional causes were identified that are to be addressed, insert additional rows. C. Do 16. By what date was (were) the intervention(s) initiated? (If multiple interventions, date by when all were initiated.) D. Check 17. Post-intervention performance measurement. Are the population and measures the same as those for the collection of baseline data (see item 9)? Yes No – If no, describe how the population or measures differ: 18. Post-intervention performance a. What were the beginning and end dates for the time period for post-intervention data on the measure(s)? b. What was (were) the overall performance level(s) post-intervention? Add post-intervention data to the data table, bar graph, or run chart (line graph) that displays baseline data. Can show baseline and post-intervention data incrementally here or refer to a display of data for all time periods attached at end of report. Show baseline and post-intervention time periods and measure names and for each time period and measure show number of observations and performance level. c. Did the intervention(s) produce the expected improvement toward meeting the project’s specific aim (item 11.a)? E. Adjust – Replan
Standard : B B 20-Jul-1999 12:00 AM O SiO2 1-Jun-1999 12:00 AM Al Al2O3 1-Jun-1999 12:00 AM Si SiO2 1-Jun-1999 12:00 AM Ni Ni 1-Jun-1999 12:00 AM Ga GaP 1-Jun-1999 12:00 AM Zr Zr 1-Jun-1999 12:00 AM In InAs 1-Jun-1999 12:00 AM Au Au 1-Jun-1999 12:00 AM Element Weight% Atomic% B K 26.66 65.80 O K 1.44 2.41 Al K 4.52 4.47 Si K 4.99 4.75 Ni K 34.77 15.81 Ga L 2.21 0.85 Zr L 0.78 0.23 In L 24.34 5.66 Au M 0.28 0.04 Totals 100.00 Figure . EDX Spectra from spectrum point 3 taken inside the Indium layer and away from the UBM. Spectrum 3 processing : No peaks omitted Processing option : All elements analyzed (Normalised) Number of iterations = 3
Warning labels VMS Yes/No Yes Customer feedback Design Ergonomics safety VMS Yes/No Yes Customer feedback Design Environment Low noise VMS dBA 95 Customer feedback Design Ergonomics Easily acessible VMS Yes/No Yes Customer feedback Design Number of operators VMS people 1 Customer feedback Testing Training time VMS hours 5 Group decision Testing Size Footprint VMS ft x ft 6 x 4 Customer feedback Design Maintenance Easy to inspect and replace parts VMS Yes/No Yes Customer feedback Design Frequency of required maintenance VMS months 6 Customer feedback Design Installation Time to assemble and disassemble VMS hours 4 Customer feedback Testing Time to set up VMS min 20 Customer feedback Testing
Required specialized power source VMS Yes/No No Customer feedback Design Cost Total cost PSU USD 3500 Customer feedback Bill of materials Documentation PDS PSU Deadline 01/30/2012 Course requirement Receipt Progress report PSU Deadline 03/05/2012 Course requirement Receipt Final report PSU Deadline 05/28/2012 Course requirement Receipt Instruction VMS Yes/No Yes Customer feedback Hard copy Applicable codes and standards Meet industry standards VMS Yes/No Yes Customer feedback Study of regulations Material Reasonable Team Yes/No Yes Customer feedback Bill of material Quantity Number of devices VMS unit 1 Customer feedback Final product Life in service
9. Appendix List Appendix 1 – Workshop outline Appendix 2 – Workshop slides (whole day) Appendix 3 – Workshop slides – components of the ISAT-EP Appendix 4 – ISAT-EP review question sheet Appendix 5 – Organisational Self Assessment Reflective Questions Appendix 6 – Activity: Collaborative Future Local Action Appendix 7 – Evaluation Form Appendix 1 – Workshop Outline Enabling Local Community Resilience through Collaboration: A Emergency Preparedness workshop for Disability Inclusive Disaster Preparedness Workshop Schedule 10:00am Welcome Presented by Professor Gwynnyth Llewellyn, Centre for Disability Research at the University of Sydney 10:05am Acknowledgement of Country 10.10am Introductions 10:25am Project update What we have learnt from the first local information sharing workshops 10:35am Update on emergency preparedness in your area 11:00am Morning Tea 11:15am Individual Self-Assessment of preparedness for natural hazards 1:00pm Lunch 1:30pm Organisational self-assessment of preparedness for natural hazards 2:15pm Afternoon Tea 2:30pm Future local action 3:50pm Formal Closure This research project has been funded by the NSW Office of Emergency Management as part of their Community Resilience Innovation Program (CRIP)
Egonomics safety VMS Yes/No Yes Customer feedback Testing Environment Low noise VMS dBA 95 Customer feedback Design Ergonomics Number of operators VMS people 1 Customer feedback Testing Training time VMS hours 5 Group decision Testing Size and Weight Foot print VMS feet 6 x 4 Customer feedback Design Maintenance Easy to inspect and replace parts VMS Yes/No Yes Customer feedback Design Frequency of required maintenance VMS months 6 Customer feedback Design Installation Time to set up VMS min 20 Customer feedback Testing Required specialized power source VMS Yes/No No Customer feedback Design
Cost Total cost PSU USD 3500 Customer feedback Bill of materials Documentation PDS PSU Deadline 01/30/2012 Course requirement Receipt Progress report PSU Deadline 03/05/2012 Course requirement Receipt Final report PSU Deadline 05/28/2012 Course requirement Receipt Instruction VMS Yes/No Yes Customer feedback Hard copy Applicable and standards Meet industry standards VMS Yes/No Yes Customer feedback Study of regulations Material Reasonable Team Yes/No Yes Customer feedback Bill of material Life in service Continued operation with approriate mainternace VMS years 5 Customer feedback Design Manufacturing facility
D.4 Pressure transducers are 4 types of pressure transducers; Gauge, absolute, differential, and vacuum. These sensors greatly vary in size, pressure capacity, tolerance, and can have chemical and/or dust treatment as well. Table D4. Advantages and disadvantages of pressure transducers Pressure sensors Advantages Disadvantages Easy to read Atmospheric pressure has to be accounted for. Two sensors are needed for differential pressure. Absolute Direct measurement of pressure Atmospheric pressure is included Gage pressure requires some work to calculate. Two sensors are needed for differential pressure. Differential Atmospheric pressure is not needed. Direct measurement between two chambers. Unidirectional measurement only Compounding failure point Vacuum Sub atmospheric pressure measurement. Only measures negative pressure. Bidirectional Pressure chambers can switch between high and low pressure. Atmospheric pressure is not needed. Direct measurement between two chambers. Compounding failure point
The impact of these building shell improvements on peak demand were also modelled but indicated these might result in an impact of only 1.8% on winter peak by 2030, and due to other factors the impact probably would be even less. RBS Model Accuracy and Comparison to Top-down Data The results of the RBS modelling were compared to other sources of estimates of residential energy use, including: Office of the Chief Economist (OCE) Energy Supply Association of Australia (ESAA) Various electricity and gas distributors. The OCE estimates are based on aggregated data from market operators for Australia’s electricity networks, who provide estimates and projections of residential consumption. In comparison, the ESAA residential energy measurements were closely aligned with distributor data, which is based on actual metered consumption data. This meant the ESAA measurements were more appropriate for assessing how the RBS estimates compared to actual residential consumption, and the figure below shows the comparison for national electricity consumption. The results show that for all the years compared there was an acceptable difference of less than 5% in the electricity estimates, and for most years a difference of 2% or less was found. In addition, the ESAA figures for recent years support the RBS’s identification of a downward trend in energy consumption. Comparisons of electricity consumption estimates were also done at the State level and, not surprisingly given the poorer appliance and use data available for the States, the results showed a lower level of consistency between the RBS results and the ESAA estimates. However, the maximum variation between the estimates was still under 10%, except for some outlier results for South Australia and Northern Territory, and the variation was under 5% for most years and States. An effective comparison between the RBS national gas consumption estimates and OCE or ESAA estimates was not possible as the OCE or ESAA estimates both do not appear to be on, or to be consistent with, State gas distributor consumption data. Consequently comparisons with State distributor estimates of gas consumption were undertaken and revealed that RBS results were within a maximum of 10% of the distributors’ estimates. This is a satisfactory result given gas consumption is so strongly influenced by annual weather variations. The comparison for Victoria, the largest natural gas consumer, is shown below, which also shows the distributors projecting declining gas consumption as does the RBS results.
2.3 Sampling Method The sampling plan for the general public uses the “GPS Assisted Area Sampling Method.” incorporates population as a measure of size, stratification and PPS (Probabilities Proportional to Size). 2.4 Stratification Method For the purpose of allocating PSUs across all large regions with different levels of economic development, stratification based on 3 official division of regions in China（Coastal,11 provinces; Central, 8 provinces; Western,12 provinces) will be taken as the first step of the sampling process. In addition, we have taken into consider the disparity between rural and urban areas in China’s social development. In order to lower the disparity between sampling from urban and rural areas in order to fulfill the research goal, this project will do a second stratification based on urban and rural characteristics within the first strata. Therefore, there are 6 layers in total. In order to obtain a self-weighted sample, number of primary sampling units (PSUs) within each stratum is proportional to the population size of that stratum. Table 1. The population size of each stratum and their respective PSU Strata The population of each strata, 2010 (person) The 18-70 population of each strata, 2010 (person) Percentage of total population Number of PSUs that should be chosen Number of PSUs that were chosen PSUs in each strata fpc_psu 11 East Municipal Districts 330383666 236757325 0.241 14.44 15 520 0.0288462 13 East county 189660000 135912876 0.138 8.29 8 366 0.0218579 21 Central Municipal Districts 196183034 140587369 0.143 8.58 9 416 0.0216346 23 Central county 260701152 186821909 0.190 11.40 11 478 0.0230126 31 West Municipal Districts 140102848 100399562 0.102 6.13 6 288 0.0208333 33 West county 255360000 182994369 0.186 11.16 11 787 0.0139771 Total 1372390700 983473410 1 60 60 2855 0.021016
Revised June 2016 [ENTITY NAME] [COUNTY NAME] COUNTY SUMMARY SCHEDULE OF PRIOR AUDIT FINDINGS [AND QUESTIONED COSTS] 2 CFR 200.511(b) , , , [FYE DATE] Finding Number Finding Summary Status Additional Information , , ,
References 1 Heister, Stephen D., Personal Contact., , , IN, 1/13/08. 2 “Missile Standard Prices Effective Oct 1, 2007.”, , , July 2007. [http://www.desc.dla.mil/DCM/Files/MFSPFY08_071107.pdf. Accessed 1/15/08.]
User’s Guide for wing_fin.m Written by Budzinski Revision 2.0 – 3/29/08 Description: The purpose of the code ‘wing_fin.m’ is to output all aerodynamic coefficients and loads needed for the addition of a wing and/or fins for an aircraft launch. These outputs include lift coefficient, drag coefficient, normal coefficient, axial coefficient, pitching moment coefficient, and shear coefficient. All of these aerodynamic coefficients and loads are output with respect to Mach number, and angle of attack. Assumptions: Several assumptions are made within the ‘wing_fin.m’ function. The assumptions can be further explained as follows: Mach number – The Mach number is assumed to from Mach 1.0 to Mach 15.0. This is assumed because for an aircraft launch the initial Mach would be near 1.0 and the wing would remain attached up until near Mach 15.0. of Attack – The angle of attack is assumed to range from an initial horizontal configuration (AoA = 0°) to a final vertical configuration (AoA = 90°). – The normal force was found assuming the Newtonian Method. Though the Newtonian Method is geared towards hypersonic flow, the launch vehicle will quickly enter the hypersonic regime with an aircraft launch. Therefore, this remains a reasonable assumption. – Similarly, the axial force was found assuming the Newtonian Method. – The shear force acting on the launch vehicle from the wing and/or fin is assumed to be equivalent to the normal force acting on the wing and/or fin itself. Pitching Moment – The pitching moment is found by calculating the normal and axial forces and multiplying them by their corresponding distances from the center of mass. Input Section: All of the variables that are passed into the code are described Variable Name Description h Altitude – measure of the height above ground level, and is initially chosen to begin at 12,000 m for an aircraft launch. [m] rho Air Density – an array initially chosen from an altitude of 12,000 m to a final altitude of 205,000 m. [kg/m3] T Variable Name Air Temperature – an array initially chosen from an altitude of 12,000 m to a final altitude of 205,000 m. [K] Description
Influencing development such that it has environmental impact on marine and terrestrial priority systems. We should engage in Infrastructure, Oil and Gas, Extractives and Agriculture. Natural resource Management is done or sustainably managed through appropriate governance. We also want to ensure more broad coordination of CSO engagement across the programme, i.e. marine, terrestrial, energy and trade and investment. What should we stop doing Working with CSOs directly but rather work through forums/coalitions in the respective CEA countries. What should we do differently? The NR Governance Barometer to be transitioned to country offices and then CSOs over 3 years, so that the countries have local ownership. Adopt spatial planning (though government planning processes) for better NRM and reduction of adverse impacts Transition investment guidelines (voluntary) into investment requirements (mandatory). Use economy opportunity/umbrella to drive priority policy work regarding development and natural resource management Innovative financing for Natural Resource Management to include private sector financing and PES. Consider implementation of Governance related work in Rovuma Landscape as demonstration of translation of high-level policy to the ground. Implications for our Approaches Work with partners/through thematic platforms Make adjustment/review programs intervention logic/documents Work differently with some partners and Identify new partners Work with non-traditional sectors e.g. finance, planning Agriculture, Infrastructure etc. Strategies Need to review skill sets of staff and fill gaps and /or also work strategically with/through existing or new partners. This need to be strategic because WWF does not need to have all the skills for all the identified work, but can find appropriate partners. Review of Strategic Objectives and Milestones The team agreed that there might be a need to review the governance objectives to reflect on the above proposed approaches and strategies. of Theories of Change Terrestrial Component: Discussions on the Theories of Change were:
AU-C 935 SAMPLE COMBINED REPORTS ON COMPLIANCE AND INTERNAL CONTROL Uniform Guidance August 2016 Effective for fiscal periods ending on or December 31, 2015 AOS Auditor Notes: AOSAM 34900.18 - .22 discusses single audit materiality considerations pertaining to the schedule of expenditures of federal awards, each major program, and individual compliance requirements as identified in the OMB Compliance Supplement and summarized in the FACCRs. See 13.40 of the AICPA GAGAS / Single Audit Guide regarding reporting findings of abuse. See guidance in AU-C 935.43 and AOSAM 40000.22 - .24 for reissuing reports. This report was updated to include dual dating examples and references in example 9b, updates appear as a double underline. AICPA Single Audit References were updated for the 2016 guide. See Table of Contents on the next page. Table of Contents Example #1. Unmodified Opinion on Compliance (with or without reportable noncompliance not affecting our opinion), No Significant Deficiencies, no Material Weaknesses You must cut and paste applicable sections below into Example 1 when required: Compliance Section Revisions Example #2. Qualified Opinion on Compliance (with or without additional reportable noncompliance not affecting our opinion) Example #3. Adverse Opinion on Compliance on One Major Program, Unmodified Opinion on Other Major Programs (with or without additional reportable noncompliance not affecting our opinion) Example #4 Scope Limitation for One Major Program, Unmodified Opinion on Other Major Programs (with or without additional reportable noncompliance not affecting our opinion) Example #5 Disclaim Opinion on Compliance (with or without additional reportable noncompliance not affecting our opinion) Internal Control Section Revisions Example #6 Material Weakness(es) and Significant Deficiencies
[This note only applies to county audits in which the County Job and Family Services Agency made allowable transfers between Federal programs. This example includes only transfers between TANF and SSBG, however, the note should be modified for any such allowable transfers made by the County Job and Family Services Agency. The ‘Total Temporary Assistance for Needy Families’ should match the amount reported on the Schedule.] NOTE L – PRIOR YEAR PROGRAM EXPENDITURE ADJUSTMENTS The Ohio Department of Job and Family Services (ODJFS) sub-awarded to XYZ County, Federal funding from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Although these programs were administered at the County level, in [Month/Year] ODJFS adjusted the County’s XXX program expenditures to align them with available funding sources. <<<modify as necessary. ODJFS’ adjustments were retroactive to the beginning of the grant period (October 1, 20XX). <<<modify as necessary. Therefore, these [Month/Year] adjustments affect 20XX-1 calendar-year program expenditures previously reported as follows: Program CFDA Number Pass Through Number 20XX-1 Federal Expenditures Reported [Month/Year] Adjustment Amount Adjusted 20XX-1 Federal Expenditures Reported [This note only applies to county audits in which the County Job and Family Services Agency made adjustments between Federal programs that impact the prior year Schedule expenditures reported. The note should be modified for the specific situation at each county.]
List of Figures: Figure 1: User nodes Figure 2: Social Network graph structure Figure 3: Project Model Figure 4: PageRank Process Figure 5: main stages of a Giraph program Figure 6: Call graph for current implementation of parsing/graph constructing script Figure 7: User Mention graph (full) Figure 8: User Mention graph (Users in the collection only) Figure 9: Graph example List of Tables: Table 1: Importance values of the tweets 2: Importance values of webpages 3: PageRank output for tweets/webpages Acknowledgments We would like to thank Dr. Edward A. Fox (instructor of the course) for guiding us through the development of this project. In addition, we would also like to thank the US National Science Foundation for support of grant IIS - 1319578. We would also like to thank Mohamed Magdy and Sunshin Lee for their unconditional support. We would also like to thank the Reducing Noise team for providing the cleaned web pages and the Hadoop team in helping out with the HBase schema designed for our team. We would also like to thank other teams for providing valuable comments to every report that we submitted, which only made us work better in achieving the goals of the project.
Organizing club License number  National, Intern. exhibition  Jointshow  WCF Rings In: City, country Date (1 report per day):  Master Rings  Special Shows number of cats Number of judges Catalog according to the show rules Yes No Organization, general Best in Shows Number of cats in the rings Equipment exhibition hall Good Excellent Longhair Yes No Adult-Ring total: placed: WCF Logo existing in the hall? Yes No Semi- Longhair Yes No Junior/Kitten-Ring placed: Awards Yes No Shorthair Yes No Neuter-Ring total: placed: Accommodation of judges Good Excellent Siam- ORI Yes No Master-Ring total: Working place of judges Good Excellent Hairless Yes No Double Master Ring total: Correct working papers handed out to judges In time belated Others Yes No Triple Master-Ring total: Stewards Sufficient Unsufficient If others, which? Jubilee/other Special Ring total: placed: Assessment of organizational procedures Breed Shows according to the license? Yes  No  Exhibition office Excellent Good Below standard Race: Number: Excellent Good standard Race: Number: Special Shows Excellent Good Below standard Race: Number: Best in Shows Excellent Good Below standard Race: Number: Beginning and end of the exhibition Excellent Good Below standard Fun Shows according to the license? Yes  No 
to demonstrate to which extent the TUDCN has been able to produce a specific added value and has the potential to continue doing so in the future, in particular towards its donors and constituencies to account for the use of the resources towards the TUDCN member organisations, the ITUC, donors and the public at large; to learn lessons from the TUDCN activities, approach and results achieved with a view of improving future performance of the network, in particular in relation to the next project that is expected to start in April 2013. 3. Evaluation object and scope 3.1 The international trade union movement represents 175 million workers in 153 countries. Affiliated national trade union centres, independent and democratically elected organisations, have for decades offered solidarity to and engaged with one another, at bilateral level or through regional groupings. A key area of solidarity and engagement is in development cooperation. Following the 2006 founding congress of the ITUC in Vienna, a particular focus was demanded on the trade union development cooperation as part of the global trade union organising agenda (new trade union internationalism) on the one hand and as policy area for public involvement on the other hand. The Trade Union Development Cooperation Network (TUDCN) was established formally in 2008 by the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) and further received the support of the EU Thematic Programme for Non State Actors (objective 3), with a first grant in 2009-2010 (Phase I) and a second grant in 2011-2012 (Phase II). The mandate of the TUDCN is (i) to improve trade union development cooperation effectiveness (cooperation and coordination) through sharing of information and practices and by stimulating improved impact and results of the solidarity efforts within the trade union movement; and (ii) to ensure input of trade union views in the development related policy debates and especially concerning the inclusion of the decent work agenda, and democratic ownership in development as key issues for sustainable development strategies. 3.2
Test Results Static Test Results A summary of results from static tests for each of the CT and LS specimens is shown in Table 2. Table Summary of the static test data for CT and LS specimens Material Weld Diameter (mm) Specimen Type Max. Strength (Newton) Failure Mode 4.3 Cross Tension 5765 Interfacial 6210 Interfacial Lap Shear Interfacial 13171 Pullout Both-Sides 5.1 Cross Tension 6555 Pullout 6732 Pullout Lap Shear 14843 Pullout Both-Sides 15226 Pullout Both-Sides 5.9 Cross Tension 7253 Pullout 7376 Pullout 6954 Pullout Lap Shear 17105 Pullout Both-Sides 17020 Pullout DQSK 4.0 Cross Tension 3212 Pullout 3419 Pullout Lap Shear 4286 Pullout Both-Sides 4447 Pullout 4.8 Tension 3419 Pullout 3427 Pullout Lap Shear 4876 Pullout Both-Sides 5029 Pullout Both-Sides 5.5 Cross Tension 3941 Pullout Both-Sides 4002 Pullout Lap 5888 Pullout Both-Sides 5873 Pullout Both-Sides A summary of the results from mixed-mode static tests is shown in Table 3. Table Summary of the static test data for MM specimens Loading Direction (degrees) Max. Strength (Newton) Fracture Mode 0 9613 Interfacial 8747 Interfacial 9345 Interfacial 30 2445 Interfacial 3097 Pull-out 90 1678 Pull-out 1372 Interfacial
Lap 5.8 14023 Pullout 13089 Pullout Both-Sides 12921 Interfacial 3.6 13629 Pullout 12843 Pullout 13307 Pullout 5.1 Tension 5.8 8063 Pullout 9594 Pullout 8687 Pullout 8850 Pullout 9098 Pullout 8295 Pullout 2.6 8135 Pullout 8913 Pullout 8090 Pullout 8093 Pullout Lap Shear 5.8 15641 Pullout 15696 Pullout 14914 Interfacial 3.6 16880 Pullout Both-Sides 14950 Pullout 15532 Pullout Both-Sides 5.9 Cross Tension 5.8 10529 Pullout 10109 Pullout 3.6 8747 Pullout 10157 Pullout 8700 Pullout Lap Shear 5.8 18052 Pullout Both-Sides 17891 Pullout 17882 Pullout 3.6 17571 Pullout 19712 Pullout Both-Sides 18182 Pullout Both-Sides Table Summary of the CT and LS dynamic test data for DQSK Weld Diameter (mm) Specimen Type Speed (m/s) Peak Load (Newton) Failure Mode 4.0 Cross Tension 5.8 3295 Pullout 3503 Pullout 2.6 3115 Pullout 3113 Pullout Lap Shear 5.8 5017 Interfacial 5564 Interfacial 4775 Interfacial 3.6 5359 Interfacial 4773 Interfacial 5384 Interfacial 4.8 Cross Tension 5.8 3526 Pullout 4376 Pullout 4134 Pullout 3625 Pullout
operations of the department, ensuring staff was in place timely for elections, budget was properly managed, critical supplies timely and standard contracts renewed or procured timely to prevent interruption. Temporary staff for the November 2012 General Election was not hired timely although there was a register in place of over 200 applicants that did not expire until late October. The additional temporary staff was scheduled for hire on September 12, 2012. They did not start until October 5th (a few days before book closing) because the management in Registration Division did not want to use the register in place so they asked Personnel to do recruitment. The additional staff was to enter voter registration applications and process absentee ballot applications. Also, past procedures included hiring temporary staff two to three weeks prior to the election and train them to answer telephones to free staff that were entering registrations from answering phones to focus on the influx of Voter Registration (VR) cards and Absentee Ballot (AB) applications. This did not happen. In prior elections, county staff was recruited to assist with processing of VR applications and AB applications to ensure all VR apps are entered prior to or by deadline and all Abs are mailed timely. This process was not followed. Generally, there is additional temporary staff (about 6 people) to assist with opening the mail daily, verifying mail before mailout, and processing returned ballots. This did not happen. Generally, ballot reports are sent to the staff for processing from the AB mail room on a daily basis to ensure ballot issue dates are entered timely once ballots are mailed out. Insufficient staff was available. The organizational structure that was in place prior to 2012 was one that worked and met the needs of Fulton County Registrations and Elections. The many changes that have occurred in the organization as will be shown below demonstrate that little thought has been given to succession plans with the many changes in the Directors position with subsequent institutional loss of knowledge. The change that came about during the first quarter of 2012 prior to the departure of the Director shows little thought with respect to transition, loss of key people and little thought on who would perform these functions . The departure of the Director left a major gap in the Registration Department with the appointment of the Registration Chief to the position of Interim Director. To understand the loss of knowledge with key people leaving, the following organizational charts need to be revisited: ORGANIZATIONAL CHART - 2004
Jane Baillie, Helen Brown, Karen Callaby, Katy Davenport, Sarah Donald, Mark Evans (Principal Investigator), Leila Faghahati, Sara Hartnell, Allison Housden, Kalbir Kaur Pabla, Candice Ward, Nicola Croxon NHS Dumfries and Galloway Fiona Green (Principal Investigator), Sheena Macdonald, Muna Mohammed, Vicky Steel, Katy Valentine, Pamela Young NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Ann Boal, Patsy Clerkin, Lynn Doran, Joanne Flynn, Emma Gibb, Brian Kennon (Co-Principal Investigator), Robert Lindsay (Co-Principal Investigator), Hilary Peddie, Bernie Quinn, Janice Shepherd Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust Janet Carling, Ann Collins, Laura Dinning, Peter Hammond (Principal Investigator), Christine Hare, Joyce Lodge, Sutapa Ray, Debora Brown, Jenny Farmer King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Stephanie Amiel (Principal Investigator), Anita Beckwith, Alison Cox, Chris Cheyette, Pratik Choudhary, Linda East, June Ellul, Katharine Hunt, Helen Rogers, Kimberley Shaw, Ben Stothard, Lucy Diamond NHS Lothian Lindsay Aniello, Debbie Anderson, Cockerell, Alan Jaap (Principal Investigator), Vida Heaney, Alison Hutchison, Nicola Zammitt Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust Gayna Babington, Gail Bird, Janet Evans, Tasso Gazis, Nicola Maude, Peter Mansell (Principal Investigator), Karen Nunnick, Dawn Spick, Laura Fenn Additional research team: University of Edinburgh Jackie Kirkham, Julia Lawton, David Rankin University of Sheffield Hasan Basarir, Mike Bradburn, Alan Brennan, Michael Campbell , Lucy Carr, Tim Chater, Cindy Cooper, Munya Dimairo, Simon Dixon, Gemma Hackney, Ellen Lee, Diana Papaioannou, Kirsty Pemberton, Daniel Pollard, Praveen Thokala, Emma Whatley, David White
Certificate This is to certify that Mr. Rupam Mondal student of Jaipuria Institute of Management; Noida has successfully completed the project work titled Reseller Development Program & Existing customer network From Marg Compusoft Pvt. Ltd. in partial fulfilment of requirement for the completion of PGDM course as prescribed by the Jaipuria Institute of Management, Noida. The project report is the record of authentic work carried out by him during the period from 18th April, 2014 to 30th June, 2014. He worked under my guidance. Signature Name: Project (Internal) Date: Counter signed by- Signature Name: Program Director Date:
Repository Submission Tracking [TEMPLATE - WITH EXAMPLES] ***Please see the "IRB Help - Repositories: Tracking Submissions and Releases" for additional information about this template.*** Date of Submission Source of Data/Specimens Description of Data/Specimens Study Status Individually Identifiable? Consent and Authorization Methods Submittal Agreement Signed [EXAMPLE 1] 5/16/2010 Tom Jones Laboratory (OHSU) - IRB #s 5678, 1234, 5432 Blood and Tumor Tissue from prior subjects in breast cancer studies 5678 1234 - Terminated 5432 - Active Yes - coded, repository has access to identifiers Consent to storage and future research on CANCER ONLY. Authorization to store in repository. 5/14/2010 [EXAMPLE 2] 6/2/2010 University of Washington [Title] Blood samples from relatives of breast cancer patients Closed to Enrollment No Consent/authorization silent on storage/future research. Not identifiable, no waiver needed. 6/1/2010 [Example 3] 7/7/2010 OHSU Clinical Records Data on treatment of bacterial infections in immunocompromised breast cancer patients N/A - clinical records Yes - repository will code OHSU IRB approved waiver of consent/auth on 7/1/2010. N/A - data collected by repository investigators Repository Release Tracking [TEMPLATE - WITH EXAMPLES] ***Please see the "IRB Help Sheet - Repositories: Tracking Submissions and Releases" for additional information about this template.*** Date of Release PI Name Institution Name Title of Research Project IRB Approval Status Description of Data/Specimens Released Individually Identifiable? Sharing Agreement Signed Genetic Opt-Out Verified [EXAMPLE 1] 8/21/2010 Jane Smith OHSU Breast Cancer Genetic Study 8/14/2010 - subjects determination (eIRB # 9999) 2 mL aliquots of blood from all breast cancer patients No 8/15/2010 Yes [EXAMPLE 2] 9/3/2010 John Doe University of Chicago Qualitative Tumor Tissue Analysis Study N/A - 100 tumor tissue slides No 9/2/2010 N/A
Provincial Grand Lodge of West Kent Lodge Visit Report 2 Appointments and Promotions In order to assess the suitability of Brethren for Appointment or Promotion, Representatives are asked to give an indication about the current performance of Past Masters and Provincial Officers who were last in the Chair or Promoted 5 or 6 years ago. Their performance levels have initially been set (in Column 3) to 3 as the “Norm”. (5 is the highest). If however you see a standard of performance beyond the norm by any of the Officers, or there’s something you wish to draw attention to, change their performance level and complete a Recommendation Form. Year First Name Surname Attended Y/N Job In Lodge Ritual Performed 1 Y 2 Y 3 Y Norm 4 Y 5 Y Y WM 2012 Y WM 2013 Y Y Y PO 2012 Y PO 2012 Y PO 2013 Y PO 2013 Y
Responsibilities expected of the representation (e.g. attending board meetings, attending other types of meetings, reviewing papers and documentation, reporting, involvement in any other activities): Expected Start Date: Please describe the expected frequency of representative involvement and how long on each occasion: Duration (e.g. one year, two years, etc) Would you like the representative to arrange a substitute if available and if they cannot attend a particular meeting: YES / NO Location(s) involved: Web site(s) most relevant to this request: Please list any supporting document attached: The ‘Providing Perspective’ service is provided as part of the KentCAN ‘Communicator’ membership package.
Name Contact Joel Bolling Senior Director, Center for Student Diversity (410) 704-2051 Finn Christensen Associate Professor, Economics, CBE (410) 704-2675 Cynthia Cooper Professor, Communication Studies, MCCS (410) 704-4012 David Fedorchak Director, University Admissions (410) 704-3974 Ray Feldmann Senior Director, Communications and Media Relations (410) 704-4672 Mariana Lebron Assistant Professor, Management, CBE (410) 704-4106 Gilda Martinez-Alba Associate Professor, Elementary Education, COE; Co-Chair, LFSA (410) 704-3581 Jessica Shiller Assistant Professor, Instructional Leadership and Professional Development, COE (410) 704-5383 *John Assistant Professor, Chemistry, FCSM (410) 704-6087 *Antwaine Smith Assistant Athletic Director, Total Tiger Skills Program (410) 704-4355 * indicates member of the Diversity Action Committee. Name in Bold indicates Chairs and/or Co-Chairs of the Work Group.
Helpful Representatives Log project Rubric Students Name___________________________________ Category 3 meets standard 2 approaching standard 1 below standard score Personal /political background for each representative Student presents a thorough background of both representatives answering all details requested. Student presents a background of both representatives but is missing requested details for one or both representatives Students background information is incomplete. More than 2 details are missing for one or both representatives. /10 Current Political Behavior Student provides a thorough description of both representatives current political behavior, response demonstrates full research and Student provides an adequate description of both representatives current political behavior. response demonstrates Student does not address the current political behavior of their representatives. response is lacking major details on one or both representatives /20
explanation of funding and voting positions. that some reasearch and explanation are provided but more detail could have been provided to clearly explain funding and voting positions. funding and voting positions. Log Student creates a daily log that reflects both representatives actions Student creates a log- but misses 1-2 days for one or both of their representatives Students log is incomplete. /10 Project format student organizes information in a clear manner, that is easy to navigate and professional looking student organizes information in a clear manner but lacks professional touches information lacks organization. /10 Total /50 Teacher Comments: