zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Identify the financial risks to the proposed project and describe the methods the Applicant will use to effectively manage and mitigate those risks. At a minimum, Applicant should address risks associated with construction, cost overruns, operation, maintenance, technology, regulations, and economic conditions. Demonstrate the economic viability of the long-term plan following project completion. Identify and demonstrate how co-products or other revenue streams contribute to the business plan. Discuss assumptions about expected income from all revenue sources. Discuss how much project viability depends on co-product revenues. Discuss estimated values and planned disposition of any potential Low Carbon Fuel Source credits, Renewable Fuel Standard Program credits (RINs), and/or carbon cap-and-trade credits. List any pending or filed litigation in which Applicant is a party, and explain the extent of Applicant’s liability coverage, if any. Please list only litigation that pertains to or impacts the project’s execution. Explain how the pending or filed litigation affects the applicant’s ability to complete and/or operate the project. Greenhouse Gas Reduction Provide the estimated GHG emission reduction resulting from the proposed projects. Download and complete the ARB GHG Emissions Reduction Calculation Tool. Scroll down and select the CDFA Dairy Digester Research and Development Program. .
Provide documents that verify any partnership with local delivery fleets (e.g. milk hauling, feed delivery) to convert diesel freight vehicles to natural gas vehicles and supply them with renewable compressed natural gas from a pilot injection project. These conversions will reduce NOx and diesel particulate matter of existing fleets. Disadvantaged Communities Discuss and quantify the potential impacts (positive or negative) of the proposed pilot project on disadvantaged communities within California (within the top 25 percent of disadvantaged communities as defined by CalEnviroScreen 3.0). Describe in detail specific mitigation measures that will be included in the project, including but not limited to, methods to mitigate impacts such as toxic air contaminants, hazardous air pollutants, criteria pollutants, groundwater and surface water impacts, truck traffic, and odor. Describe how the project proponent(s) engaged the community. Did community-based non-profit organization(s) involved in potentially impacted communities provide assistance in engagement efforts? Did discussion include potential adverse impacts of proposed projects, including a net increase in criteria pollutants, toxic air contaminants, hazardous air pollutants, groundwater and surface water impacts, and truck traffic, and odor? List the public, community organization and/or government stakeholders involved.
6.6. O MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTS – April 2017 Accounts noted. JC reported currently ahead of budget, anticipating current trend to continue, forecast for the full year currently £170K surplus, against a budget of £26K, largely driven by slower recruitment at beginning of the year, also considerable success in the commercial areas, increase in income and control of cost of sales. MSL sales to hit income of over £1m.Significant milestone for MSL Terrace Bar improved performance discussed, was this deflecting business from The Dirty Duck, it was noted that the Terrace Bar with its different offer attracted different clientele, The Dirty Duck holding its own, this outlet would be the next area of focus for SR and BBW for 2017-18. JF and EC joined the meeting part way through this agenda item. Matters for decision/discussion 6.7. O GENDER PAY GAP Paper noted. It was further noted that MSL figures not incorporated into the statistics, no legal requirement to publish gender pay gap figures given the size of the company. Remuneration Policy to be readdressed in light of the information that has come out of the Gender Pay Gap review. It was agreed that a narrative be incorporated into the publication of the information. To reference the binary nature of the legislation and the Union’s position on gender definitions. Agreed to remove the decimal points for ease of presentation. To incorporate Warwick SU’s use of a robust job evaluation scheme, and Warwick SU’s values, to incorporate adjectives where appropriate to bring the narrative to life. Resolved: Gender Pay Gap figures for 2017, noted. Recommendation to publish the figures after the Finance &HR Committee has seen and approved the finalised accompanying narrative statement approved, unanimously. 6.8. O GDPR SOFTWARE PURCHASE DDa in attendance for this agenda item. Papers noted. It was noted that the Audit & Risk Committee had discussed whether the University would be doing something similar and whether Warwick SU could collaborate in some form. Meeting taken place with the University IT Director, University staff had looked at the system who have confirmed it would automate
ALJ/PVA/jt2 Date of Issuance 6/19/2017 Decision 17-06-012 June 15, 2017 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF Order Instituting Rulemaking Regarding Policies, Procedures and Rules for Development of Distribution Resources Plans Pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 769. Rulemaking 1408013 (Filed August 14, 2014) And Related Matters. Application 1507002 Application 1507003 Application 1507006 (NOT CONSOLIDATED) In the Matter of the Application of PacifiCorp (U901E) Setting Forth its Distribution Resource Plan Pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 769. Application 1507005 (Filed July 1, 2015) And Related Matters. Application 1507007 Application 1507008 DECISION ON REVISED TRACK 2 DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS
Assignment of Proceeding Martha Guzman Aceves is the assigned Commissioner and Michelle Cooke is the assigned Administrative Law Judge in this proceeding. Findings of Fact Increased renewable generating capacity has resulted in an imbalance in the timing of demand that risks the curtailment of renewables when demand is low but renewable production is high. Data from SCE’s proposed pilot is expected to be available in late 2019 while SCE is expected to implement matinee pricing in the form of mandatory TOU periods and an opt-in RTP tariff that incorporates discounted rates during the matinee period for all nonresidential customers in early 2019. Data from SCE’s pilot will lack statistical significance. The anticipated cost of SCE’s pilot is $400,000. Conclusions of Law The timing of and expected data from SCE’s pilot does not justify its $400,000 anticipated cost. SCE’s pilot is not necessary for the design of matinee pricing tariffs. SCE’s Petition for Modification of Decision 16-11-021 should be granted. The evaluation and design of matinee pricing tariffs should continue in SCE’s RDW proceeding, A.16-09-003, without the need for a pilot. IT IS ORDERED that: Southern California Edison Company’s Petition for Modification of Decision 16-11-021 is granted.
Kenneth Capps, College of Central Florida, Ocala, FL 11:15 – 12:15 Presentation Session 7 A. John Muench, Heartland Community College, Normal, IL B. Lawrence Williams, Ajit Dixit, William Kappler and Stephen Scheidig, Wake Technical Community College, Raleigh, NC C. Abe A. Ojo and Bryan Mitchell, Atlanta Metropolitan College, Atlanta, GA 12:15 – 1:00 Lunch Break and Exhibits 1:00 – 2:00 Panel Discussion I and Workshop A. Led by Mark Matthews, Durham Technical Community College, Durham, NC B. Led by Tracy Cheatham, Wake Technical Community College, Raleigh, NC C. (2 hour workshop) Linda Fanis, ChemEd Digital Library, Madison, WI 2:00 – 3:00 Panel Discussion II A. Led by DeeDee Allen, Wake Technical Community College, Raleigh, NC B. Sybil K. Burgess, Brunswick Community College, Supply, NC 3:00 – 3:30 Closing Session Keynote Speaker Deborah Exton is a Tenured Senior Instructor at the University of Oregon, where she has been since 1993. Her primary teaching responsibilities are in the General Chemistry program and she is also the General Chemistry Coordinator for the department. She received her B.S. from Metropolitan State College of Denver (1987) and her Ph.D. in physical chemistry from the University of Denver (1992). A primary focus of her work over the last 15 years has been to develop a green general chemistry laboratory curriculum and she is currently in the process of authoring a general chemistry laboratory
People with difficulty reading are often ashamed—67% said they hid their illiteracy even from their spouses. In research situations they may also hide their illiteracy from investigators. Therefore investigators must demonstrate respect for persons (The Belmont Report) by writing the clearest possible consent forms, providing help by reading or recording consent documents, and evaluating participants’ comprehension through asking questions or other techniques. Suggestions for Improving Readability of Consent Documents Before You Write Know your target population. What is their likely age, education, race/ethnicity, SES, and location? How much and in what ways does the audience differ from you? How much experience do you have with this audience? If little or none, can you locate someone who has worked with this audience to advise you about communication strategies? When You Write Use a question and answer format to organize the informed consent (IC). See online templates for IC. This format results in shorter answers that are focused on a single topic, rather than running topics together. It seems more interactive to participants and it models the style of thought (questioning) we would like them to employ to promote comprehension. Use short sentences—try for a maximum of 10 words per sentence. Use parallel sentence structure as much as possible. Avoid semicolons. Use the active voice—“We will do X. You will do Y.” Use personal pronouns—“I”, “we”, and “you”. Limit use of words with more than 3 syllables. Look critically at words that are standard to you but may be jargon to other people. Eliminate them or provide a clear explanation. Look at “everyday” words and consider whether they are likely to be known to your target population. Given the prevalence of reading difficulties, this activity is at least as important as eliminating professional jargon. This table contains some words used in research that may be unfamiliar to many prospective participants and a more familiar word or phrase for each. Obviously this list can only be a sample.
Total Number of Adults: 1 Total Number of Children: 3 # Child’s First Name Age ** Height/ Weight Coat Size Shirt Size Size Shoe Size Pants Size/ Length Favorite Colors Needs/ Priorities Would Like/Hopes For 1 Mariana 3 weeks Girl 21 inches 8.8 oz 3-6 m 3-6 m 3-6 m pink/ purple clothes, socks, age appropriate books age appropriate toys 2 Roman 8 Boy ? 8T small 8T small 8 T small 3.5 8T Green Socks, clothes, Jeans Beybalds, movies, skateboard, helmet 3 Kaleb 10 Boy ? 10 M M 4.5 10 slim Blue Socks, clothes, Jeans Beybalds, movies, skateboard, helmet First names, ages, and gender of other Household members at the Address not list above Samara (31) female Household Gift Ideas Bed sheets (twin-green or blue), Kitchen appliances, cleaning supplies
IEEE 802.19.1a Wireless Coexistence Comment resolution on CID89 in 1st TG review Date: 2016-11-xx Author(s): Name Company Address Phone Email Sho Furuichi Sony Sho.Furuichi@sony.com Abstract This document provides comment resolution on CID89 in 1st TG review. Comment ID Page No. Section Line No. Type (General, Editorial, Technical) Comments Proposed changes Resolutions 89 79 7.2.2.9.4.1 15 Technical Calculation of MI is not specified.Should provide how to calculate. Need proposal wait for contributions Summary This document provides comment resolution for CID 89 in 1st TG review. The resolution itself is to add the explanation of how to calculate MI in section 7.2.2.8.4.1 of D0.5 but the author also provides the editorial changes to that parent section 7.2.2.8 globally in order to improve the readability and to use correct wordings. ===== (Text starts below) Algorithm Introduction It is very important for a coexistence system to in the service For example, the service will be a prioritized WSOGCO (i.e. early comer each corresponding channel). Specifically in a case where multiple similar/dissimilar WSOGCOs are same channel when they are included in each others coexistence sets, a harmful interference may occur in . To solve this problem, coexistence system shall support
6.3. Subscription Service Persons may monitor the proceeding by subscribing to receive electronic copies of documents in this proceeding that are published on the Commission’s website. There is no need to be on the official service list in order to use the subscription service. Instructions for enrolling in the subscription service are available on the Commission’s website at . 7. Public Advisor Any person or entity interested in participating in this rulemaking who is unfamiliar with the Commission’s procedures should contact the Commission’s Public Advisor in San Francisco at (415) 7032074 or (866) 8498390 or email ; or in Los Angeles at (213) 5767055 or (866) 8498391, or email . The TTY number is (866) 8367825. Section 1711(a) provides that: Where feasible and appropriate, except for adjudication cases, before determining the scope of the proceeding, the Commission shall seek the participation of those who are likely to be affected, including those who are likely to benefit from, and those who are potentially subject to, a decision in that proceeding. The Public Advisor’s Office will contact appropriate stakeholders and local governments that may be affected by this proceeding. 8. Intervenor Compensation Any party that expects to claim intervenor compensation for its participation in this Rulemaking must file its notice of intent to claim intervenor compensation within 30 days of the prehearing conference. (See Rule 17.1(a).) Intervenor compensation rules are governed by § 1801 et seq. of the Public Utilities Code. Parties new to participating in Commission proceedings may
8. Details of Experience (Please list positions held, commencing with most recent employer, continuing on an extra sheet if necessary). Please state for each position held if the role is Temporary, Permanent or Acting Date (DD/MM/YYYY) From To Name & Address of Employer and Nature of Business Job Title and Description of Duties with special emphasis on experience relevant to the post. Please include reason for leaving.
Office of Research Support’s Opinion Final Decision Director of Office of Research Support’s Approval Signature: _____________________________ Date: ____________________ Vice President’s Approval Signature: _____________________________ Date: ____________________
Project Resources: Have been identified and are being utilized to gather estimates Have been identified but are not ready to start on project Have not been identified Additional Risk questions: High Medium Low Additional Risk questions High Medium Low Additional Risks: Thank you very much for taking the time to complete this survey. Your feedback is valued and very much appreciated!
Impacted Areas / “Touch points” List all of the products, applications, systems, organizations or areas, etc., that are directly or indirectly affected by and/or are included in the projects. TBD TBD TBD TBD Constraints / Risks Identify specific limitations or pre-determined targets (i.e. start / finish dates, budget limits, resource limits, outside factors, etc.) that will impact project costs, timing or quality. Identify potential risks that will need to be managed in order to mitigate their impact to the project’s success. TBD TBD TBD TBD Assumptions These are known “unknowns”. List factors that are used to establish initial timing, scope, cost and quality parameters for the project’s success (including the customer’s assumptions). TBD TBD TBD TBD Success Factors List the factors that must be achieved in order for this project to be considered a success for the business. What factors determine if the project objectives have been met? TBD TBD TBD TBD Budget If a project budget has been identified, list the amounts for planning purposes (i.e. ongoing expenses, project expenditures). High level project budget amounts (estimated) Cost for Process overview, design and mapping $ 0.00 Cost to develop / establish Configuration in application $ 0.00 Cost to develop / establish Configuration in application $ 0.00 Licensing / Software costs to departments $ 0.00 Training costs to departments $ 0.00 Application integration between X application and Y application $ 0.00 Ongoing support and maintenance of application $ 0.00
ISA 61241-0: Electrical Apparatus For Use In Zone 20, Zone 21 And Zone 22 Hazardous (Classified) Locations – General Requirements ISA 61241-1: Electrical Apparatus For Use In Zone 21 And Zone 22 Hazardous (Classified) Locations – Protection By Enclosures “ “TD” ISA 61241-10: Electrical Apparatus For Use In Zone 20, Zone 21 And Zone 22 Hazardous (Classified) Locations – Classification Of Zone 20, Zone 21 And Zone 22 Hazardous (Classified) Locations. ISA 61241-11: Electrical Apparatus For Use In Zone 20, Zone 21 And Zone 22 Hazardous (Classified) Locations – Protection By Intrinsic Safety “ID” ISA RP12.06.01: Recommended Practice For Wiring Methods For Hazardous (Classified)Locations Instrumentation Part 1: Intrinsic Safety The following specification might be needed to test the sensor that is assumed to be intrinsically safe: ISA TR12.2: Intrinsically Safe System Assessment Using The Entity Concept
Step 2 Anticipated Results (Criteria for Success or Evidence of Completion) Step 3 Measure Performance on Objective/Expected Outcome Direct Measure(s): Indirect Measure(s): Step 4 Results/Outcomes for this Reporting Period (Quantitative and Qualitative Data) Step 5 Improvement Plan Based on Assessment Results (based on Step 4 findings) Step 6 Changes or Improvements Resulting from the Improvement Plan (based on Step 5) Project Status Step 1 Objective/Expected Outcome in Measurable Terms Objective 5: Step 2 Anticipated Results (Criteria for Success or Evidence of Completion) Step 3 Measure Performance on Objective/Expected Outcome Direct Measure(s): Indirect Measure(s):
Section 2: Reporting Results 2.1 Reporting Results (Quantitative and/or Qualitative Data) 2.2 Analysis of Progress and Results (Narrative and interpretation based on results/data from 2.1) Section 3: Plans for Improvement 3.1 Action Plan for Improvement (What is being done, when it will be done, and by whom to achieve success) Project Status Section 1: Define Outcome 1.1 Expected or Intended Outcome Objective 2: 1.2 Anticipated Results (Criteria for Success or Evidence of Completion) 1.3 Means of Measurement (Direct OR Indirect Measures) Section 2: Reporting Results 2.1 Reporting Results (Quantitative and/or Qualitative Data) 2.2 Analysis of Progress and Results (Narrative and interpretation based on results/data from 2.1)
Section 3: Plans for Improvement 3.1 Action Plan for Improvement (What is being done, when it will be done, and by whom to achieve success) Project Status Section 1: Define Outcome 1.1 Expected or Intended Outcome Objective 3: 1.2 Anticipated Results (Criteria for Success or Evidence of Completion) 1.3 Means of Measurement (Direct OR Indirect Measures) Section 2: Reporting Results 2.1 Reporting Results (Quantitative and/or Qualitative Data) 2.2 Analysis of Progress and Results (Narrative and interpretation based on results/data from 2.1) Section 3: Plans for Improvement 3.1 Action Plan for Improvement (What is being done, when it will be done, and by whom to achieve success) Project Status 1: 1.1 Expected or Intended Outcome Objective 4:
1.2 Anticipated Results (Criteria for Success or Evidence of Completion) 1.3 Means of Measurement (Direct OR Indirect Measures) Section 2: Reporting Results 2.1 Reporting Results (Quantitative and/or Qualitative Data) 2.2 Analysis of Progress and Results (Narrative and interpretation based on results/data from 2.1) Section 3: Plans for Improvement 3.1 Action Plan for Improvement (What is being done, when it will be done, and by whom to achieve success) Project Status Section 1: Define Outcome 1.1 Expected or Intended Outcome Objective 5: 1.2 Anticipated Results (Criteria for Success or Evidence of Completion) 1.3 Means of Measurement (Direct OR Indirect Measures)
Section 2: Reporting Results 2.1 Reporting Results (Quantitative and/or Qualitative Data) 2.2 Analysis of Progress and Results (Narrative and interpretation based on results/data from 2.1) Section 3: Plans for Improvement 3.1 Action Plan for Improvement (What is being done, when it will be done, and by whom to achieve success)
2.1 List FOUR internal control measures you will use to control the cash in the business. 2.2 Assessment Criteria 1 mark 2 marks 3 marks 4 marks Mark obtained Evidence of research No evidence of research Some evidence of research Evident an effort has been made to collect source documents (at least 4) Over 4 source documents obtained from outside businesses Practicality of design Impractical design not relevant to receipting details required on document Some relevance in design Relevant information on receipt relatively practical some areas can be improved upon User friendly receipt, easy to understand (customer) and easy to use (business), exceptional, original design Logo and slogan No logo or slogan evident Logo and slogan evident Some connection to business activity. Logo relevant to business activity. Slogan catchy and original TOTAL 12 QUESTION 3 3.1 List THREE steps you will take before granting credit to customers.
QUESTION 4: Cash Payments Journal of Best Sport Traders – March 2012 CPJ1 Doc D Details Fol Bank Trading stock Stationery Wages Sundries Amount Fol Details of sundries Cash Receipts Journal of Best Sport Traders – March 2012 CRJ1 Doc D Details Fol Analysis of receipts Bank Sales Cost of sales
Debtors Journal of Best Sport Traders – March 2012 DJ1 Doc D Details Fol Sales Cost of sales Debtors Allowances Journal of Best Sport Traders – March 2012 DAJ1 Doc D Details Fol Debtors allowances Cost of sales Creditors Journal of Best Sport Traders – March 2012 CJ1 Doc D Details Fol Creditors Trading Packing Stationery Equipment
control stock materials Creditors Allowances Journal of Best Sport Traders – March 2012 CAJ1 Doc D Details Fol Creditors control Trading stock Equipment QUESTION 5 Cash Payments Journal of Best Sport Traders – April 2012 CPJ2 Doc D Details Fol Bank Trading stock Wages Creditors control Discount received Sundry accounts Amount Fol Details
production due to our inexperience. The most importance thing is that we are eating vegetables in abundance in our daily diet” Celestino weeding his production Celestino`s family eating what they produced Celestino and his family are proud of their production LUCIA MIRANDA: “ I am like father and mother to my children, because I am a widow. For me, this Project (the training and accompaniment of brother Bernardino, who is responsible forthis Project) is very valuable. Now, I have learned to cultivate this kind of vegetable and my neighbors come to my house to buy my crops, even the teachers visit my house to taste my vegetables. The rest of my crops, I take to sell in the neighboring communities. This is a good source of income to support my children. ¡Thank you, ATEK!
information that present the geographical distribution of quarry fines, should be compiled to enable the identification of potential end markets. Some of the barriers to utilization are related to the location of quarry fines, the limited awareness of potential markets by aggregate producers, the limited knowledge about quarry dusts arising and their characteristics, and the absence of fully developed fit for use specifications for a wide range of end products. Often quarry fines require some degree of processing before they can be used, which may increase their cost and at the same time requires suitable infrastructure and equipment to become readily available. CHAPTER THREE 3.0METHODOLOGY 3.1 PREPARATION OF MATERIALS The quarry dust was sampled from Kitengela. The parent rock of the dust was established to be granite rock. The lateritic gravel was also sourced from Kitengela. This was obtained at a depth of two meters below the ground surface. The sample was a disturbed sample. Ordinary Portland cement class 32.5 was also used as a stabilizer for comparison purposes. The materials were blended in the following ratios as tabulated. STABILIZED MATERIAL STABILIZER PERCENTAGE OF STABILIZER LATERITIC GRAVEL NONE 0 LATERITIC GRAVEL QUARRY DUST 5 LATERITIC GRAVEL QUARRY DUST 10 LATERITIC GRAVEL QUARRY DUST 15 LATERITIC GRAVEL QUARRY DUST 20 LATERITIC GRAVEL CEMENT 0.5 LATERITIC GRAVEL CEMENT 2.5 The tests described below were all conducted for the tabulated materials.
Project news 31 January 2018 Construction of accessible bus stops Project summary Work has commenced on construction of the next 10 bus stops to be brought up to disability compliance standards. All Queensland bus stops must meet State legislation by December 2022. Locations The next bus stops to be constructed in the new Noosa ‘look and feel’ design are: Marcus Beach, David Low Way – north & south bound Sunrise Beach, Orient Drive – Orient Park Tinbeerwah, Cooroy Noosa Rd – eastbound at Sunrise Rd Castaways Beach – one northbound and two southbound Tewantin, Griffith Ave – near Park View Ct Tewantin, Cooroy Noosa Rd –eastbound at Carramar Tewantin, Cooroy Noosa Rd – eastbound at Heritage Park Funding The Queensland Government’s Passenger Transport Accessible Infrastructure Program provides funding assistance to councils to help them achieve compliance. The funding ratio is currently dollar for dollar. Noosa Council has allocated $600,000 in the 2017/18 capital works programme including $300,000 matching funding from the State Government. Funding limits the scope of work and does not permit installation of a shelter if none already exists. Duration of work Work has commenced and is scheduled for completion by late May, weather dependent. Disruption to bus passengers Bus stops will close temporarily during the work. Notices advising of closures and alternative arrangements will be placed at affected stops. Your patience during the work is appreciated. Further information Please contact Council’s project officer Dallas Bickley on 5329 6500.
Abbreviations used in table: GAD, generalised anxiety disorder; OCD, obsessive-compulsive disorder; PTSD, post-traumatic stress disorder; QoL, quality of life; RCTs, randomised controlled trials. Studies not meeting the prespecified inclusion criteria (Table 9) were excluded: studies specifying an age range as an inclusion criterion and in which the upper age limit was 65 years were excluded. Studies were also excluded if they were: trials reporting only post-crossover results and pre-crossover results could not be obtained; case reports, historical articles, narrative reviews, editorials, and opinion pieces; reports published as only meeting abstracts, and where insufficient methodological details were reported to allow critical appraisal of study quality. Where it was not possible to determine the age of the included population (e.g., baseline characteristics not reported), authors were contacted with a request for additional information. No additional information was provided within the allotted period of time. Planned data abstraction, critical appraisal, subgroup analyses and evidence synthesis procedures are documented in the review protocol (Appendix 4). Results of the review of clinical effectiveness evidence No study, either RCT or observational, meeting the prespecified inclusion criteria (Table 9) was identified. The search of clinical trial registries identified no ongoing or planned RCTs in older adults with a treatment-resistant anxiety disorder. The emergence of systematic reviews evaluating the clinical effectiveness of pharmacological and psychological treatments for anxiety in older adults highlights the increasing awareness of the need to manage this condition. Quantity and quality of research available The searches retrieved a total of 3,644 records (post deduplication) that were of possible relevance to the review (Figure 1). These were screened and 109 full references were ordered. Of the full references evaluated, the full publication of only one study was not obtained. No study met the prespecified inclusion criteria outlined in Table 9. The full list of studies screened and subsequently excluded (with reasons for exclusion) from the review is presented in Appendix 5. Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram for studies included and excluded from the clinical effectiveness review
PROJECT CLOSURE REPORT PURPOSE Project Closure Report Purpose The Project Closure Report is the final document produced for the project and is used by senior management to assess the success of the project, identify best practices for future projects, resolve all open issues, and formally close the project. PROJECT CLOSURE REPORT GOALS Project Closure Report Goals This Project Closure Report is created to accomplish the following goals: Review and validate the success of the project. Confirm outstanding issues, risks, and recommendations. Outline tasks and activities required to close the project.
CATEGORY 4 3 2 1 Habitat Animals 3 or more animals were included in the project. 2 animals were included in the project. 1 animal was included in the project no animals were included in the project Habitat plants 3 or more plants were included in the project. 2 plants were included in the project. 1 plant was included in the project. No plants were included in the project Labels Every item that needs to be identified has a label. It is clear which label goes with which structure. Almost all items (90%) that need to be identified have labels. It is clear which label goes with which structure. Most items that need to be identified have labels. It is clear which label goes with which structure. Less than 75% of the items that need to be identified have labels OR it is not clear which label goes with item. Accuracy 95% or more of information included in project (drawings, plants, animals, facts) are accurate. (95-90%) of information included in project (drawings, plants, animals, facts) are accurate. (89-75%) of information included in project (drawings, plants, animals, facts) are accurate. (Less than 75%) of information included in project (drawings, plants, animals, facts) are accurate. This is how the project will be graded.
Kinnaur District of Himachal Pradesh 48. Mr. Vikarant Singh Kanwar (H-2012-MBA-053) A Study on Consumers’ Perception towards Small and Medium Car Brands in Solan Town of Himachal Pradesh 49. Mr. Gaurav Thakur (H-2012-MBA-054) College Students’ Perception towards Online Shopping
Musical (mini)concerts and nights of praise should be organized once a year. This could be a great evangelistic opportunity. Dec. 2013 (yearly) Saved youths and willing members should be integrated into the choir or worship team. The aim is to raise a youth choir. June 2014 Online materials for voice training, song selection, professional singing, etc should be sourced and stored in the database by Sis Peace and bro Gospel. Monthly The time allocation for singing during services should be increased; 10 minutes is too small. July 2013 Singers should be inspired by the Holy Spirit. Their lives and demeanour should reflect their songs. They should smile, make gestures and/or move while singing. They should listen to recordings of their rehearsals and renditions. Daily 9.0 ROADMAP Deadline Target Dec. 2013 Lively, inspiring music, new songs. June 2014 All singers can read musical notes Dec. 2014 Worship teams in all DCLM NE local churches. Professional music: ‘Angelic voices, harmony, modulation, variety. June 2015 Evangelistic bait, (Mini)concerts. Singing in NE languages. Dec. 2015 Many instrumentalists, live band/orchestra. June 2016 Song composition, albums.
Job Description Template For Internal Use Only Position Details Position Title: Project analyst (6 Months Fixed term) Department: Finance Paygrade: 25 Supervisor Title: Product Lifecycle Manager ANZ Physical location of the position: Sydney Geographic scope of the position: Date of JD Draft: 08.01.2017 Position Purpose In one or two sentences briefly summarise the overall purpose of this role, i.e. broadly, what this role does and why Analyst will work closely with the project lead to deliver project status reporting, data, analytics and leading relevant project meetings for the execution of the project. Project analyst will be responsible for development of models to identify and optimize ESO inventory through Tableau and Excel. The role will be an initial 6 month contract to drive phase II and Phase III of the project to benefits realization. Key Responsibility Areas In order of importance, briefly describe, in sentence form, the key responsibilities of this position (principal duties and responsibilities of the position) as it exists today. Describe the job, not the person in job. Each item listed below should be a key responsibility of the person, not a day-to-day activity.) Typically, job descriptions should contain no more than seven or eight key responsibilities ranked in order of highest percentage time to least. Approximate Percentage of Time Key Responsibilities Areas 80% Project development and execution for Synthes ESO optimisation and reduction Provide decision support and financial modelling for the project. Provide sensitivity and scenario analysis on cost and benefits for stage II and Stage III Provide insights/variance analysis on Inventory segmentation and Inventory optimisation. Develop Benefit realization maps and tracking mechanisms for key project decisions. Deliver project status reports, risk register and project communications. Lead project meetings with project manager
The risk to project delivery is medium. Permissions/licenses are in process. The project is not considered controversial. 2 The risk to the project is low. Permissions/licenses are in place. Project is appropriately planned with low risk to delivery. Project is not considered controversial. 3 The risk to the delivery is very low. Permissions/ licenses are all secured. There is minimal risk to delivery and plans are simple. Project is not considered controversial. 4 Section 10. Total score The awarded scores for each section are expected to reflect the recommendations proposed. The scores will be adjusted according to the questions that are applicable and so too will the score categories to make them proportionate. Total out of 40: 25% or less (10) Likely to be rejected 26-79% (11 - 31) Recommend Approve or Reject as appropriate 80% or more (32) Likely to be approved Total out of 44 25% or less (11) Likely to be rejected 26-79% (12 - 34) Recommend Approve or Reject as appropriate 80% or more (35) Likely to be approved Total out of 48 25% or less (12) Likely to be rejected 26-79% (13 - 37) Recommend Approve or Reject as appropriate 80% or more (38) Likely to be approved Total out of 52 25% or less (13) Likely to be rejected 26-79% (14 - 41) Recommend Approve or Reject as appropriate
7. Which components have you consistently used in your group sessions? (check all that apply) Ice breakers/opener Activity/topic/theme Closing/reflection/debrief School loop review Journaling Other (please specify) 8. If you have used the Project Arrive group curriculum provided at the beginning of the year, how useful has it been? Not useful at all Somewhat useful Extremely helpful Comments (optional) 9. Beyond the Project Arrive curriculum, what other resources did you use to enhance your group? (check all that apply) Ice breakers Games Activities Guest speakers Field trips Special events Food Other (please specify) 10. Of the following topics you may have covered in your group, how well were they received by mentees? (rate all that apply) Not well received Moderately received Well received Extremely well received Transitioning to high school Goal setting Academic achievement Conflict resolution Jobs/career planning Peer relationships Family relationships Other (please specify) 11. Please rate the overall sense of cohesion that characterizes your group at this point in the year? Not cohesive Somewhat cohesive
Please continue to Page 2 At my school… Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree 19. during the past 30 days, I was polite to adults and peers. 1 2 3 4 20. I know who to ask for help if I need help. 1 2 3 4 21. I feel empowered to help friends advocate for themselves. 1 2 3 4 Please rate your level of agreement with the following statements... Not at all true A Little True Pretty Much True Very Much True I know how to solve problems in a safe and healthy way. 1 2 3 4 I practice problem solving in a safe and healthy way. 1 2 3 4 I feel confident that I make healthy choices. 1 2 3 4 In general, I’m doing well in school. 1 2 3 4 I come to school regularly. 1 2 3 4 I plan to finish high school. 1 2 3 4 I plan to continue my education after high school (for example, community college, military, vocational school, etc.). 1 2 3 4 I have goals and plans for the future. 1 2 3 4 What are 3 things you expect to gain from being in your group this year? a. b. c. THANK YOU!
Project Name: ______________________________________________Audit Date(s): _____________________________ Project Manager: ______________________________ Project Auditor: __________________________________________ Project Management Knowledge Areas Successes Shortcomings Comments and Recommendations Project Integration Management Project Scope Management Project Time Management Project Cost Management Project Quality Management Project Human Resource Management Project Communications Management Project Risk Management
information, when they will need it, and how it will be given to them. Information distribution—making needed information available to project stakeholders in a timely manner. Performance reporting—collecting and disseminating performance information. This includes status reporting, progress measurement, and forecasting. Administrative closure—generating, gathering, and disseminating information to formalize phase or project completion. PROJECT RISK MANAGEMENT Risk management is the systematic process of identifying, analyzing, and responding to project risks. It includes maximizing the probability and consequences of positive events and minimizing the probability and consequences of adverse events to project objectives. It includes: Risk management planning—deciding how to approach and plan the risk management activities for a project. Risk identification—determining which risks might affect the project and document their characteristics. Qualitative risk analysis—performing a qualitative analysis of risks and conditions to prioritize their effects on project objectives. Quantitative risk analysis—measuring the probability and consequences of risks and estimating their implications for project objectives. Risk response planning—developing procedures and techniques to enhance opportunities and reduce threats from risks to the project’s objectives. Risk monitoring and control—monitoring residual risks, identifying new risks, executing risk reduction plans, and evaluating their effectiveness throughout the project life cycle. PROJECT PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT A subset of project management that includes the processes required to acquire goods and services to attain project scope from outside the performing organization. It consists of: Procurement planning—determining what to procure and when. Solicitation planning—documenting product requirements and identifying potential sources.
Table of contents Introduction The Victorian Energy Efficiency Target (VEET) is a market-based scheme that encourages households and businesses to reduce their energy consumption. When people make eligible energy efficiency improvements to their home or workplace through the scheme, they earn certificates. Every certificate represents one tonne of greenhouse gas emissions saved over the lifetime of the product installed. Certificates can then be sold to energy retailers, who must to meet an emissions savings target each year. When the VEET scheme started in 2009, it was only available to households. The scheme was expanded to include businesses in 2012. Energy efficiency measures currently available for business through the scheme use simple, deemed methods. This is limiting the opportunities for many businesses to benefit from VEET incentives for their potentially greatest energy savings. To create more flexible benefits for business through the VEET scheme, the Victorian Government is considering introducing new, project- based assessment methods. This follows setting new scheme targets for 2016-2020, designed to encourage increased energy efficiency through the scheme.
Deemed Power consumption of the market average product multiplied by Assumed operating hours Power consumption of the efficient installed product multiplied by Assumed operating hours Upgrade energy use minus Baseline energy use Measured on site before the project is carried out Measured on site after the project is carried out Upgrade energy use minus Baseline energy use Due to the need for specific details about a business’s particular energy efficiency improvements, project-based assessments are more complex and therefore more costly, than deemed methods. However, they have the potential to generate much greater energy cost savings and greenhouse gas abatement, and support energy efficiency upgrades in a greater range of businesses. The typical size of an implementation using a project-based assessment method varies widely. In the NSW Energy Savings Scheme (ESS), of all project-based assessments implemented to date, around 1,200 individual projects have created between one and 5,000 certificates each, and around 130 projects have created between 5,000 and 65,000 certificates, with most of these in the 5,000 to 25,000 certificate range. Policy direction Previous stakeholder feedback Some stakeholders and businesses have provided feedback on introducing project-based assessments into the VEET scheme during the VEET consultation in April and May 2015. General views included: Strong support for alignment of project-based assessment methods with those from energy efficiency schemes in other jurisdictions, particularly the NSW ESS Stakeholders value the credibility and guaranteed savings demonstrated via measurement and verification (M&V) approaches
function. Tel. Email Skype Notes Tel. Email Skype Notes Tel. Email Skype Notes SkillsforSale Contacts SkillsforSale Representative Tel. Email Skype Notes SkillsforSale Adviser Tel. Email Skype Notes 8. Project Milestones Expected timescale Payment Due Confirmation of project brief 3 days 20% deposit Upon completion of Project Objectives 1-3 2 weeks 40% of overall value of work. Upon completion of project. 2 weeks Final balance, payment due before release of
HERA JRP FULL PROPOSAL APPLICATION TEMPLATE Requested budget per year: budget table A To be completed for each Principal Investigator (one table for each PI) Please remember to include a detailed justification of the requested budget items below each table. PI number: PI name and Institution: BUDGET ITEMS YEAR 1 Budget (in Euros) YEAR 2 Budget (in Euros) YEAR 3 Budget (in Euros) TOTAL Budget (in Euros) 1. Employment costs Senior researcher (s) 0 Post-doc. Researcher(s) 0 PhD Student (s) 0 Administrative personnel 0 Other (please specify) 0 Subtotal Employment costs 0 0 0 0 2. Equipment item 1 0 item 2 0 item … 0 Subtotal Equipment 0 0 0 0 3. Travel and meeting costs Conferences 0 Fieldwork 0 Project meetings … 0 Other (please specify) 0 Subtotal Travel and meeting costs 0 0 0 0 4. Consumables item 1 0 item 2 0 item … 0 Subtotal Consumables 0 0 0 0 5. Dissemination and Knowledge Exchange costs item 1 0 item 2 0 item … 0 Subtotal Dissemination and KE costs 0 0 0 0 6. Other costs (e.g. Please specify 0 7. Overheads (if applicable) 0 T O T A L 0 0 0 0
Overall requested budget of the CRP for the whole duration of the project: budget table B Below the table, please remember to justify the distribution of costs across the PIs and explain how this relates to the planned outputs and the division of work across the project partners. BUDGET ITEMS TOTAL Budget -PI 1 [enter PI name] (in Euros) TOTAL Budget -PI 2 [enter PI name] (in Euros) TOTAL Budget -PI 3 [enter PI name] (in Euros) TOTAL Budget -PI... [enter PI name] (in Euros) TOTAL Budget -PI... [enter PI name] (in Euros) TOTAL CRP Budget (in Euros) 1. Employment costs 0 2. Equipment 0 3. Travel and meeting costs 0 4. Consumables 0 5. Dissemination and Knowledge Exchange costs 0 6. Other costs (e.g. sub-contracting). Please specify 0 7. Overheads (if applicable) 0 T O T A L 0 0 0 0 0 0
Communication Tool Description Frequency Author(s) Recipient(s) Location Approved? Status Reports Summarize progress of the project and upcoming activities, including reporting budget and schedule variance Project Manager Sponsor, team lead, project team SharePoint No Minutes Written record of a meeting See meeting table above Facilitator or designee Meeting attendees and other interested parties SharePoint Yes Quality Management Perform Quality Assurance Following are the quality assurance processes for this project: Integrated change control – verifies that any changes to quality during the project are discussed and approved by the appropriate person Monitoring schedule and cost variance – ensures oversight of the project schedule and cost in relation to the project baseline to provide visibility to any potential project schedule or cost issues Definition of deliverable acceptance criteria and/or expectations – verifies that the deliverables are of an acceptable quality and meet the customer’s expectations Acceptance management – verifies that the deliverables are of acceptable quality and that they meet the established project requirements Peer review of project management documents – provides documents associated with management of this project (e.g., business case, project charter, and this project plan) a review by the ITD project management office for clarity and implementations of previous lessons learned Following are the quality assurance processes for the product produced by this project: Add or remove as necessary. Web design walkthroughs with ITD’s software architect and web design team – verifies compliance with the design specifications and web design quality Prototype walkthroughs – screen shots are shown to the appropriate user group to confirm that the requirements were understood and the system designed correctly Usability testing (before development) – provides further validation that the requirements were understood and the system designed correctly (while no databases are in place, this is used to walk users through the application and determine if requirements need to be clarified or changed before the design is complete) Code walkthroughs with ITD’s software architect – verifies compliance with the design specifications and code quality