zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
estimated according to the preferred scales set out in the risk management plan. according to the preferred scales set out in the risk management plan. The areas affected by the risk event should also be noted, typically in terms of scope, schedule and cost. expected value. In the simplest approach the cost impact is multiplied by the probability (assuming probability has been estimated on a numeric scale) to give the expected value. The expected value of more complex risk events may be calculated using tools such as decision trees. risk event, should it occur. expected and proximity may be based on certain assumptions. For example, the impact of delay in an activity in the schedule may be assessed on the basis that that activity lies on the critical path. individual risk events and the results of qualitative risk analysis. For complex risk situations, the fields of the risk register may be inadequate to store all the relevant information. Response Owner Type Actionee Response Status Residual/secondary risks The person responsible for managing the risk. The nature of the response will probably be evident from its description but noting the category can aid analysis of overall risk in terms, for example, of how much threat has been transferred or what proportion of The person who will implement the response. This may, or may not, be the same person as the owner. The actions chosen in response to the risk event and their effect (e.g. a reduction in probability, impact or both). The cost of implementing the response should be estimated to ensure it does not exceed the expected value of the risk itself and that the total cost of risk responses fits within the risk budget. A simple statement of whether the risk event is active (default situation) or closed. A risk event may be closed if its probability or impact has greatly reduced (and it has been accepted), work has progressed beyond the cause of the event or Despite best efforts to deal with a risk event, the planned response may leave some residual risk or create a new, secondary risk. In some cases this can be covered by explanatory text, in others it may be necessary to create a new risk event with
Id Description of Risk (including any identified ‘triggers’) Impact on Project (Identify consequences ) Assessment of Likelihood Assessment of Seriousness Grade (combined Likelihood and Seriousness) Change Date of Review Mitigation Actions (Preventative or Contingency) Responsibility for mitigation action(s) Cost Timeline for mitigation action(s) Work Breakdown Structure <n> <A “newspaper headline” style statement. Also identify relevant triggers that may cause the risk to be realised.> <Describe the nature of the risk and the impact on the project if the risk is not mitigated or managed> <Change in Grade since last review> <Date of last review> <Specify planned mitigation strategies: Preventative (implement immediately) Contingency (implement if/when risk occurs).> <Specify who is responsible for undertaking each mitigation action(s)> <Specify timeframe for mitigation action(s) to be by> This is to indicate that the identified mitigation action has been included in the WBS (workplan). 1 Steering Committee unavailable. Identified triggers: Steering Committee meetings repeatedly rescheduled due to lack of availability; Members do not attend despite prior confirmation of attendance. Lack of availability will stall progress (ie. delayed decisions will defer output finalisation, extend project timelines and staff resources will be required for longer than anticipated) H H A NEW 15/02/06 Preventative: Highlight strategic connection - link Project Objective to relevant Agency strategic objectives Confirm 2006 meeting schedule in January Confirm SC membership Widen representation (include other Agencies) Project Manager NA 15/03/06 Y complete
2 Inadequate funding to the project Identified triggers: Funding is redirected; Costs increase (poor quality materials/ inaccurate cost estimates) Budget blow out means cost savings must be identified – ie. reduced output quality, timeframes are extended, outcomes (benefits) will be delayed and/or reduced. M M B No change 15/02/06 Contingency: Re-scope project, focusing on time and resourcing Project Manager TBC TBC N
RISK NO DATE OPENED OBJECTIVES What are we trying to achieve? POTENTIAL RISK What could go wrong? CURRENT RISK RISK MITIGATION STRATEGY How do we plan to manage the risk? RESIDUAL RISK RESPONSIBLE OFFICER STATUS DATE CLOSED Likelihood Impact Risk Rating Likelihood Impact Risk Rating 1. 1.1 1.2 . 2. 2.1 .
Area/Department Risk Register ID Date Treatment Developed Risk Category Risk Owner Treatment Owner Risk Description Control Effectiveness Risk Treatment Monitor & Review Implementation Status Treatment Action Responsibility Implementation Date Provide a description of what the risk is. Provide the last known control effectiveness rating (e.g. high, medium or low). Selecting the most appropriate treatment option involves balancing the costs and efforts of implementation against the benefits derived. Factors such as legal, regulatory, the natural environment and social corporate responsibility must also be considering when deciding on treatment options. Some examples of treatment options are: Avoiding the risk by deciding not to start or continue the activity that gives rise to the risk Taking or increasing the risk in order to pursue an opportunity Removing the risk source Assign person to authorise the time and resources required for risk treatment. Assign person must implement the risk treatment. Agreed timeframes must be establishing to outline when risk treatment will be achieved and completed. Consideration must be given to how risk treatment will be monitored to assess whether the treatment is effective. The frequency and method of how progress against treatment plans is reported must be defined. Provide a status with regard to implementation progress (e.g. not started, in progress or completed).
What are the hazards? Who might be harmed and how? What are you already doing? What further action is necessary? Action by whom? Action by when? Done Manager’s name Caroline Wilson Signature Date 5.01.18 Assessment review date 5.01.19 (or earlier if incident occurs) Are other specific risk assessments required? Asbestos Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Display Screen Equipment Electricity Fire Safety Lone Working Manual Handling New and Expectant Mothers Noise Personal Protective Equipment Stress Management Vibration Work Equipment Workplace Health, Safety and Welfare Working at Height
Hazards, hazard events, and reasonably foreseeable worst case consequences Inherent risk (no controls) from matrix (mark with X) Controls (measures to reduce risk) Residual risk (with controls) from matrix (mark with X) High High Medium Medium Low Low High High Medium Medium Low Low High High Medium Medium Low Low
Hazards, hazard events, and reasonably foreseeable worst case consequences Inherent risk (no controls) from matrix (mark with X) Controls (measures to reduce risk) Residual risk (with controls) from matrix (mark with X) High High Medium Medium Low Low High High Medium Medium Low Low High High Medium Medium Low Low
Hazards, hazard events, and reasonably foreseeable worst case consequences Inherent risk (no controls) from matrix (mark with X) Controls (measures to reduce risk) Residual risk (with controls) from matrix (mark with X) High High Medium Medium Low Low High High Medium Medium Low Low High High Medium Medium Low Low
Hazards, hazard events, and reasonably foreseeable case consequences Inherent risk (no controls) from matrix (mark with X) Controls (measures to reduce risk) Residual risk (with controls) from matrix (mark with X) High High Medium Medium Low Low High High Medium Medium Low Low High High Medium Medium Low Low
Hazards, hazard events, and reasonably foreseeable worst case consequences Inherent risk (no controls) from matrix (mark with X) Controls (measures to reduce risk) Residual risk (with controls) from matrix (mark with X) High High Medium Medium Low Low High High Medium Medium Low Low High High Medium Medium Low Low
Hazards, hazard events, and reasonably foreseeable worst case consequences Inherent risk (no controls) from matrix (mark with X) Controls (measures to reduce risk) Residual risk (with controls) from matrix (mark with X) High High Medium Medium Low Low High High Medium Medium Low Low High High Medium Medium Low Low
The link can be used to submit a Risk Assessment Screening Questionnaire (RASQ) or the date it is submitted. You will need to log on with your Bronco name and password Complete each question. (See sample below) If you answer “yes” to have any of the medical conditions listed, you will need to complete an additional Health History Questionnaire (HHQ) (if needed a link will automatically show up to get to the Questionnaire) and take this to the Student Health Center. Do this immediately Please! Before going to the Student Health Center, call ext. 4000 and tell them you need an appointment with the Occupational Health Doctor, Dr. De Stefano, to turn in a HHQ to work with animals. See Dr. De Stefano ASAP, you will not be able to work with the animals if you do not get approval. To turn in proof to your Professor or TA, log on and press Ctrl + Print Screen (to copy the screen), open up word or equivalent, Ctrl + V to paste it and print this out as proof of submitting the RASQ.
Supplier Risk Category High risk Medium risk Low risk 1. Construction Construction work Installation of equipment, for example, transformers Outage work Line construction Working at heights Demolition work Excavation work Blasting Scaffolding Building and modification of infrastructure Lifting equipment Support work Rigging Tunnelling work Batch plant Explosive power tools Civil work or Modification of plant or similar structure Construction of Road Using mobile plant Construction of storage facilities for waste, fuel, oil vehicle and hazardous substances Work undertaken in terms of environmental authorisations e.g. EIA approvals, Water Use Licences, Waste Use Licences, or Atmospheric Emission Licences 2. Maintenance work Maintenance Vehicle maintenance Transportation Transportation of (low risk loads) Services Emergency services Fire and emergency equipment maintenance Technical consulting Consultants installing electronic equipment in the office and at sites (phones, computers, screens) 1. Low risk (include work not conducted at heights) Labour broking or providing staff (admin/office-based) Cleaning services (not conducted at heights) Gardening or landscaping Supply and maintenance of electronic equipment (iPads, phones, computers, laptops, screens) Waste disposal 2. Manufacturing: product supply, transportation and delivery Consumables and other miscellaneous items Stationery and Printing Catering, 3. Services Consulting and auditing Training and coaching/ mentoring Event management (consulting, planning and logistics) Cleaning services (offices, ablution facilities etc)
Table I. Risk Indicators for Progressive or Delayed-Onset Hearing Loss (For Use with Neonates and Infants Through 2 Years of Age) Family history of permanent childhood hearing loss Mother of child of 1st cousin of child Father of child of child More than one relative of the same parent Sister of child Aunt of child Brother of child Uncle of child Stigmata or other findings associated with a syndrome known to include a sensorineural or conductive hearing loss or Eustachian tube dysfunction (BOR) Stickler Trisomy 21 – Down syndrome Noonan Williams Trisomy 18 – Edwards syndrome CHARGE association Zellweger Trisomy 13 – syndrome Pierre Goldenhar or OAV) Trisomy 8 (Warkany Syndrome) or Trisomy 9 (Mosaic Syndrome) Postnatal infections associated with sensorineural hearing loss Confirmed bacterial meningitis Confirmed viral meningitis In utero infections Rubella Toxoplasmosis Herpes Syphilis Neonatal indicators Intensive care greater than (>) 5 days Exposure to ototoxic at risk exposure requiring exchange transfusion membrane oxygenation (ECMO) ventilation Syndromes associated with progressive hearing loss
Likely +12 12 24 31 35 39 44 48 53 +18 18 30 37 41 45 50 54 59 +24 24 36 43 47 51 56 60 65 +30 30 42 49 53 57 62 66 71 Likely +36 36 48 55 59 63 68 72 77 +42 42 54 61 65 69 74 78 83 +48 48 60 67 71 75 80 84 89 Color Code Map Scenario (inches above MHHW) 12 24 36 48 are a number of online tools that provide regionally relevant sea level rise inundation maps. The most commonly used is the NOAA Sea Level Rise and Coastal Flooding Impacts Viewer. This is a national tool that depicts potential impacts to marshes and human communities from a range of sea level rise projections from zero to six feet coupled with mean higher high water (MHHW). It also illustrates changes in flood frequency and includes visual simulations of flooding at local sites. Fire are typically characterized into three categories: urban fires, wildland-urban interface fires, and wildland fires. Urban fires occur within a developed area and pose a direct risk to development. Wildland-urban interface (WUI) fires occur where the built environment and natural areas are intermixed (the fringe of urban areas). Wildland fires exist in wilderness land. in the urban environment and in the wildland-urban interface result in direct damage to the built environment and can injure or kill residents. Wildland fires can cause damage to linear infrastructure systems that serve the Bay Area, causing outages downstream of the failure; can impact the air quality in cities during the duration of the fire; and can impact water quality in watersheds impacted by a wildland fire. Wildland and
Appendix F: Revision History Table 22. Revision History Version Number Revisions Made Date of Revisions Author 0.1 SOP-Draft 5/10/2013 Tom Hydock (Noblis) 0.2 Reduced content at clients request 5/20/2013 Tom Hydock (Noblis) 1.0 Content revised to be consistent with Risk Management Plan included in the CMS Expedited Life Cycle (XLC) 6/19/2013 Tom Hydock (Noblis) 2.0 Removed Risk Management Plan and reformatted document with XLC template. 5/30/2014 Celia Shaunessy (CMS/OIS/EASG/DITG) 2.1 Updated CMS logo. 02/02/2015 Potu (CMS/OEI/DPPIG)
Monday 7th December 2015 In-Depth Technical Workshop 09:00 - 17:00 The Latest Strategic Thinking & Practical Insights In Value & Capital Management Led by Tom Wilson, Chief Risk Officer, ALLIANZ Tuesday 8th December 2015 The CRO Forum: RiskMinds Main Conference Day 1 07.45 CRO-Only Breakfast Briefing with William Hague, Former Foreign Secretary, Conservative Party Leader & Leader Of The House Of Commons Please contact Patrick Sale at for more information 08:00 Registration & Coffee 08:35 Chairman’s Opening Address: Dominic Financial Services Leader, PwC SINGAPORE Reinventing Business Strategy To Fit Economic & Regulatory Expectations RiskMinds Technical Lecture Series 08:45 Guest CFO Address Taking Financial Services To The Next Level How Are Financial Services Building A Future Business Strategy Around Regulatory Demands & Industry Developments? Chng Sok Hui, Chief Financial Officer, DBS GROUP Examining The Importance Of Capital Management For The Value Of A Financial Services Firm In Tomorrow’s World Tom Wilson ALLIANZ 09:10 RiskMinds 2015 Guest CRO Interview Kevin Burrowes, Global Banking & Capital Markets Leader, PwC will Interview Marc Moses, Group Chief Risk Officer, HSBC HOLDINGS Points for discussion include: - The journey from trading desk to CFO to CRO - The role of CRO in influencing management - Identifying future risks rather than looking backwards 09:40 The Future Of Risk Michael Alix, Principal, Financial Services Risk Practice, PwC Post Financial Crisis Operational Risk Modelling How Can We Improve Accuracy? 10:10 Guest Address The Outlook For Politics, Finance & Society In The Post Crisis Landscape William Hague, Former Foreign Secretary, Conservative Party Leader & Leader Of The House Of Commons 10:45 Morning Coffee Traditional Risk Management Vs Modern Day Challenges 11:15 Geopolitical Briefing The Geopolitical Landscape For 2016 Examining The Key Forces Shaping Political Risk & The Implications For The Global Financial Services Community
Perspective 2: 25mins Meet The Ethical Hacker Just What Is The Typical Profile Of A Cyber Hacker? How Sophisticated Are They? How Vulnerable Is Your Institution? Jamie Woodruff, Ethical Hacker, Cyber Security Expert & Certified Penetration Tester Discussion & Audience Q&A: 20mins 17:15 Learning Lessons From The GFC & Identifying Emerging Op Risks Op Risk Transformation. Regulatory Change; New Technology & Operating Models; Macroeconomics; And Societal & Political Change Michael Grimwade MITSUBISHI UFJ Leverage Ratio, LCR & XVA How Best To Incorporate The Leverage Ratio & LCR Into XVA? Andrew Green LLOYDS BANKING GROUP Risk vs Pricing Models, Validation, Regulations Massimo Morini BANCA IMI IFRS9: The New Impairment Methodology What Will It Mean? Ralf Leiber DEUTSCHE BANK 17:50 Chairman’s Closing Remarks Chairman’s Closing Remarks Chairman’s Closing Remarks Chairman’s Closing Remarks Chairman’s Closing Remarks 17:55 End Of RiskMinds 2015 Main Conference
Declaration I confirm that this piece of work is my own and does not violate the University of Cambridge Judge Business School’s guidelines on Plagiarism. I agree that my submission will be available as an internal document for members of both Cambridge Judge Business School and McKinsey & Co’s Global Risk Practice. If my submission either wins or receives an honourable mention for the Risk Prize, then I agree that (a) I will be present at the award presentation ceremony 20 June 2018, (b) my submission can be made public on a Cambridge Judge Business School and/or McKinsey & Co websites. This submission on risk management does not exceed 10 pages. Signed (Electronic Signature) Please include this declaration form the cover page of your paper submission.
I think that this therapy would help J.L. to relax and take time to clear her mind and focus on something other than school and work. My plan for her would to practice guided imagery for thirty minutes a day, somewhere she feels comfortable and undistracted. She should continue doing this every day for one month starting 6/14/13. At the end of the month if the guided imagery is working to alleviate some of the stress form her life than she should continue to do it, if not a different therapeutic method should be used. I believe that stress reduction would greatly affect J.L’s sleeping patterns and over-all health. In order to know if this intervention is working I think that J.L. should keep a log of her stress levels every day. These levels should be rated on a zero to ten scale, with zero being no stress at all, and ten meaning the stress levels are unusually high. J.L. should log her stress levels before and after the therapeutic guided imagery. Another intervention I have planned for J.L. would be a consistent exercise routine. This does not have to be and strenuous workouts, but a walk or short jog at least three times a week for at least a half hour at a time. I think that this would help with her stress levels and any problems that she is having associated to weight. Exercise has been proven to boost the neurotransmitter endorphins in the brain that are linked to feeling good. It allows you to focus on body movement instead of all the daily stressors in life. It can also boost one’s self-confidence and lowers feeling of depression and anxiety (Mayo Clinic, 2013). I think that J.L. should find something that she enjoys doing in order for her to stay interested in it, and stick to a plan of physical activity three times a week for one month starting 6/14/13. She should keep a log of what she does each day and the amount of time dedicated to physical activity each day. Readiness for Change In order for someone to change their behavior they have to want to change. If they are forced into changing more than likely they will relapse into old behaviors. The Transtheoretical
Thighs 21.5 in. Appendix D Food Log Starting June 3rd, 2013 Breakfast Lunch Dinner Snacks Monday Two eggs, toast with butter. Cup of coffee with creamer. Spinach salad with pecans, strawberries and poppy seed dressing. Banana and Fresca pop. Vegetable stir-fry with grilled BBQ chicken breast. Popcorn Tuesday yogurt with granola and a banana with a glass of orange juice. Turkey sandwich with Swiss, lettuce and honey mustard. Bottle of water BBQ pork sandwich with grilled corn on the cob with Fresca Nature valley protein bar Wednesday Brown sugar oatmeal .Cup of coffee with creamer. Burger no bun with ketchup. Grapes and bottle of water. Vegetable stir-fry with medium size Small glass of moscato nothing Thursday Two eggs, Apple, Flavored water. Grilled cheese with tomato soup 6 pc grilled shrimp. Backed potato with sour cream and butter. Glass of milk Apple with peanut butter Friday Greek yogurt with strawberries with glass of Orange juice. Turkey club sandwich and a Coke. Went out to eat had chicken quesadilla, black beans Spanish rice and two margaritas. Snickers candy bar Saturday Jimmy delights sausage, egg and cheese sandwich Turkey sandwich with provolone, lettuce and honey mustard with a Coke Went out to eat had pretzel bun cheese burger with tater tots. Glass of water. Nothing
Appendix G Food Log Starting June 17th, 2013 Breakfast Lunch Dinner Snacks Monday Brown sugar oatmeal with glass of orange juice Spinach salad with pecans and poppy seed dressing with Fresca. Pork tenderloin with corn on the cob and glass of flavored water. Celery and peanut butter. Tuesday Two eggs with toast and a cup of coffee with creamer. Turkey, Swiss, lettuce honey mustard on whole wheat wrap with bottle of water. Chicken vegetable stir-fry with small glass moscato. popcorn Wednesday Spinach, red pepper and Swiss omelet with glass of milk. spinach salad with French dressing and half of a grilled cheese. Vegetable stir-fry with lemon chicken with bottle of water. Carrots with ranch. Thursday Greek yogurt with granola and an apple. Cup of coffee with creamer. Cup of Italian wedding soup, carrots with ranch and grilled chicken breast Chicken cordon bleu with grilled asparagus and bottle of water. Apple Friday Jimmy Delights sausage, egg and cheese sandwich with orange juice. Grilled chicken breast salad with ranch dressing and bottle of water. Went out to eat had small dinner salad with Cesar dressing and small steak. Celery and peanut butter. Saturday Spinach and Swiss omelet with bottle of water. Turkey, Swiss sandwich on whole wheat with mayo and bottle of flavored water. Went out to dinner had small chicken alfredo with small glass of moscato. nothing
Person has a known terminal condition * #1 Health Inventory only tracks terminal conditions with a DNR SIS Question 16, Section 3A Do Not Resuscitate Orders (DNR): A medical order written by a physician to withhold Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) including breathing/ventilation by an assistive or mechanical means including but not limited to, mouth-to- mouth, mouth-to-mask, bag-valve mask, endotracheal tube, ventilator and/or chest compressions, and/or defibrillation. The order is written with the informed consent of a competent individual or their duly authorized health care agent or guardian. Person has a communicable Disease Concerns: TB / Hepatitis A, B, or C/ HIV / STD / MRSA * #15 Health Inventory Page 15 Health Reference Manual SIS Question 10/16, Section 3A The individual has a known communicable disease or is a candidate for contracting or spreading the disease. A communicable disease is a disease that may be passed or be carried from one person to another directly or indirectly. Candidates for contracting TB or Hepatitis or HIV / STD may include those who have multiple sexual partners or those who engage in activities resulting in the exchange or exposure of body fluids. Circle TB for any individual who has recently tested positive on skin
Person needs supports to utilize/manage safety devices in the home 1 or more incidents per quarter SIS Question 5, Part E Examples: Changing batteries in smoke detector, CO indicator, flashlights, radio for emergency information Managing specialized safety devices such as visual fire alarm, etc. Person does not have a communication source (e.g., telephone) to contact emergency services; and/or needs assistance to contact emergency services via phone or otherwise access assistance; * MOCABI 2.3 SIS Question 5, Part E Examples: Person has no landline or wireless phone, pager, Life Alert, etc. to contact emergency services if needed Skill development/supports needed to use a phone or other source to access emergency assistance
Person needs supports due to current or past engaging in verbal aggression towards others 1 or more incidents SIS Question 7, Part B; Questions 3/4, Part D; Questions 3/4/5/6, Part F; Questions 9/13, Section 3B Person needs supports to prevent engaging in verbal aggression towards others (e.g., screaming or yelling at others; makes derogatory and inappropriate comments to others), and jeopardizing their safety and safety of others. This may be a means of communicating such emotions as displeasure/anger, or response to such factors as but not limited to: Personal, emotional, and/or environmental stressors; or physical ailments. The person may not feel he or she is being communicated with or supported in a manner which makes sense to the individual, e.g., other person’s use of inappropriate and obscene language in the presence of individual; ensure others are following person-centered plan when communicating with individual.
2 – CB (Cost-Benefit) In this level, the bank includes the following types of risks: - Risks which are avoidable under all circumstances and the Overall Threat Likelihood of risk is “High” or above and the benefits of risk treatment (e.g. controls) does not justify the level of investments required to implement the risk treatments Risks within the criteria defined for Level 2 should also be considered for this level. By defining this the bank recognizes that it may not be able to mitigate all high exposure risks when the benefits of risk treatment does not justify the level of investments required to implement the risk treatments. However, by informing the board and senior executives about such risks, the bank can make an informed decision to retain high levels of exposure for such risks. 3 In this level, the bank includes the following types of risks: - Risks which are avoidable under all circumstances and the Overall Threat Likelihood of risk is below “High” and the Overall Threat Level is above the Target Threat Level defined for the risk and the bank has resources to prevent the risk and the benefits of risk treatment (e.g. controls) justifies the level of investments required to implement the risk treatments Bank’s operational risk framework requires risk owners to define a Target Threat Level for each risk owned by them. By defining this level, the bank wants to escalate any low or medium exposure risks that are beyond their pre-defined Target Threat Level. within the criteria defined for Level 2 should also be considered for this level. Level 3 – RC (Resource Constraints) In this level, the bank includes the following types of risks: - which are avoidable under all circumstances and the Overall Threat Likelihood of risk is below “High” and
Even though the episode was considered as high complexity for the adjustment for HAC02 was greater and therefore selected for the adjustment. This assessment is performed on an episode level for all HAC episodes. As the adjustments have been designed and calculated at an episode allowing for aggregation to a jurisdiction, LHN or hospital level to determine the aggregate impact. The issues and other considerations of developing a funding adjustment for safety and quality are discussed further in Section 8.1. Vignettes The following clinical examples demonstrate the application of the risk adjustment model and funding adjustments to individual episodes. Case one: falls resulting in fracture or intracranial injury – low risk A 27 year old female patient was a booked admission to day surgery for a cholecystectomy. She had no comorbid conditions. Following the surgery, she slipped and fell in the ward, hitting her head on the floor. A computed tomography (CT) scan showed a subdural haematoma. The patient was transferred to the tertiary hospital for further treatment and surgery. Table 15 breaks down the complexity and adjustment calculations for case one. Table 15: Case one breakdown: HAC02 Falls resulting in fracture or intracranial injury Complexity score calculations Risk factor breakdown Complexity Score Baseline 45.8 Age Group :025 to 029 +0 Charlson Score =0 +0 DRG Type: Surgical +2.6 Gender: Female +0.7 MDC: Diseases & Disorders of the Hepatobiliary System & Pancreas -3.8 Emergency admission: No +0 ICU Hours: No +0 Admission transfer status: No +0 Total 45.3 Adjustment calculations Complexity group Low Incremental cost 6.7%
Appendix D: Complexity bounds Figure 23: HAC01 - Pressure Injury – Complexity Bounds Figure 24: HAC02 - Falls resulting in fracture or other intracranial injury – Complexity Bounds Figure 25: HAC03 - Healthcare associated infections – Complexity Bounds Figure 26: HAC04 - Surgical complications requiring unplanned return to theatre – Complexity Bounds Figure 27: HAC06 - Respiratory complications – Complexity Bounds Figure 28: HAC07 - Venous thromboembolism – Complexity Bounds Figure 29: HAC08 - Renal failure – Complexity Bounds Figure 30: HAC09 - Gastrointestinal bleeding – Complexity Bounds Figure 31: HAC10 - Medication complications – Complexity Bounds Figure 32: HAC11 - Delirium – Complexity Bounds Figure 33: HAC12 - Persistent incontinence – Complexity Bounds Figure 34: - Malnutrition – Complexity Bounds Figure 35: HAC14 - Cardiac complications – Complexity Bounds
Ensuring Procurement Policies and guidance promotes equality 3.7 Rural communities – people living in rural communities The website/Internet offers a channel of communication that is independent of location. Ensuring Procurement Policies and guidance promotes equality Use of broadband access in rural communities. This can to a degree be mitigated by ensuring that the website is compliant with mobile telephones 3.8 Sexual orientation - lesbian, gay, bisexual & heterosexual people The website/Internet provides a platform regardless of orientation. Everybody has equal access Ensuring Procurement Policies and guidance promotes equality 3.9 Socio-economically disadvantaged – people who are disadvantaged due to factors like family background, educational attainment, neighbourhood and employment status The website/Internet provides a platform regardless of status. Everybody has access Evidence indicates that people from these backgrounds have a high usage of mobile telephones and also use social media. This offers opportunities to engage with these people – if they wish Ensuring Procurement Policies and guidance promotes equality Group may not have access to internet facilities. Social media and access to mobile telephones, i.e. FOI requests by Twitter 4. Monitoring and review 4.1 What arrangements have you put in place to monitor the actual effect of your financial plan following its implementation? Quarterly review during Management Team Meetings. Quarterly review through Performance Dashboards
1. SIPOC Suppliers Inputs Process Outputs Customers Providers of the required resources Resources Required to execute process Requirements Description of Activity Deliverables From Process Requirements Anyone who receives output of the process 1) User/lead Command; 2) DoD and SAF Acquisition offices; 3) Acquisition Program Office; 4) Contractor 1) Program Initiation Docs; 2) DoD 5000.02; AFI 63-101/20-101; AFPAM 63-128 Chap 12; 3) Cross-functional Risk working group/IPT; 4) Contractor Risk mgmt plan and company risk mgmt standard practices Overarching program requirements (CDD, 1067) and program constraints; Analysis of Alternatives, Market Research; Execute and document program specific Risk and Issue Management Approved program Risk Management Plan including issue mgmt; Database of individual risks and issues and associated Risk Handling Plans and issue Corrective Action Plans; 5X5 risk matrix; 1X5 issue matrix; Individual risks statements in If-Then format; Issues in Since-Then format; Risk and Issue ratings using AF Standard Criteria; Risk Handling and Corrective action plan data sufficient to generate planned and actual burn-down charts. Acquisition Decision Authority, PEO, DoD and AF oversight IPTs, Program office personnel, Contractor. Users, Program Office personnel; outside Subject Matter Experts; Contractor and sub-contractors Program reqmts; results of other assessments (Technology Readiness Assessment; System safety Hazard analysis, Analysis of System Security risks, etc.) existing documented risks; linked mechanically sound program schedule; schedule risk analysis tool; Well-constructed risk statements and sufficient background to develop data needed for risk analysis. Mechanically sound and linked schedule with sufficient detail (WBS level 4 or greater desired). Conduct Integrated Risk Assessment to quantify and analyze risk data in support of annual program office estimate and other cost estimate reviews New and updated risks in a 5X5 matrix; issue 1X5 matrix; Schedule risk analysis using specifically identified risk; cost analysis to support program office estimate Risk quantified impact to cost and schedule (best case/worst case/ and most like case) assuming the risk occurs; Issue quantified impacts to cost and schedule; ID of schedule task impacted by risk/issue; Risk and Issue ratings using AF Std Criteria updated by quantified data Acquisition Decision Authority, PEO, DoD and AF oversight IPTs, Program office personnel, Cost Staff
Access to Services: Combines data from Census 2011 on access to water and sanitation, energy, and waste collection. Access to service delivery effects the resilience of communities in terms of health and time available for activities other than providing for basic needs. StatsSA – Census 2011 Wards are given a score of 0 to 4 depending on the extent of their access to basic services. Wards with the least access are given a rating of 4. The weightings for the individual census components are as follows: 40% Energy: 25% Sanitation: 25% Waste: 10% Household Income: Census 2011 household income data. Households with a low of income are less likely to have access to credit and less resilient to all shocks – including those associated with climate change and its impacts on health, economy, and infrastructure. StatsSA – Census 2011 Wards are given a score of 0 to 4 depending on income profiles. Wards with the lowest income profiles are given a rating of 4. Ranked by Divided annual income into groups: None: 0 Low: 0 - R38 200 Medium: R38 201 - R153 800 High: >R 153 800 Points assigned as follows: +1 where None > 10% (Nat avg = 15.1%) +1 where Low > 20% (Nat avg = 48%) +1 where Medium < 10% (Nat avg = 22.2%) +1 where High < 5% (Nat avg = 14.7%)
Population age profile: Age provided in 5 year intervals from 0 to 85+. This indicator is used to identify wards in which there are significantly above the national average children and/or old people. Areas with above the national average children and/or old people will have less economically active adults and are like to be less resilient to climate change. StatsSA – Census 2011 Wards scored between 0 and 2. 1. Divide ages into three groups: 0-14: child 15-39: young 40+: old 2. Areas that are 10 percentage points on either of side of the national average are regarded as extraordinarily low or extraordinarily high. 3. Wards with a score of 1 has either (high percentages of children or low percentages of young people) or (high percentages of old people and low percentages of young people). Wards with a score of 2 have few young people and many old people and many children. Land ownership: Identifies areas in which land is owned privately, by the state, or communally It is more difficult to raise capital against land that is communally owned, and therefore more difficult to develop. Wards scored between 0 and 5 on the basis of the percentage of the ward that is communally owned. Wards that are 75-100% communal land are scored as 4.
Workplace location: Name of person conducting assessment: Date: Spot the Hazard Assess the Risk Fix the Problem Evaluate Results Identify the work task or activity? What are the hazards associated with each activity? Is the risk associated with the hazard low, moderate, significant or high? If the risk is deemed unacceptable for the task, what will be done to reduce or remove the risk? By whom? By when? Go through the first 3 steps again to ensure risk levels are now at an acceptable level Revised risk level
Event Risk Assessment EVENT: LOCATION: DATE: REVIEW DATE ASSESSOR: DATE OF SIGNED: HAZARDS IDENTIFIED GROUPS OF PERSONS AT RISK EXISTING CONTROLS RISK INDEX L X S = R FURTHER RISK MANAGEMENT RISIDUAL RISK INDEX DATE & SIGNED L S R L S R SLIPS/TRIPS/ FALLS Staff Volunteers Public Visitors Regular inspections of all relevant areas carried out 3 3 9 Keep all pathways clear and ensure all wires, equipment etc is set up correctly not causing any trip hazards. Safety officer to check sites before opening. Regular inspections of all 2 3 6 CRUSHING (Crowd) Volunteers Public Visitors Main risk area will be around Tour Series circuit – controls by of barriers and a carefully evaluated stewarding plan Lower risks at Henrietta Park & RVP for family and Sportive events but B&NES staff & stewards will be present 3 5 15 Ensure all staff and volunteers are fully briefed of emergency procedures Site evacuation plan in place Access points around site to enable speedy evacuation Regular monitoring of crowd 2 5 10 TEMPORARY STRUCTURES Staff Volunteers Public Visitors Contractors Competent contractor used for installation of marquee at RVP Sign off of marquee by contractor Gazebos to be weighted in all four corners and staked where necessary Structural integrity checked by Building Control as part of SAGE process. 3 4 12 Safety inspection of all structures including gazebos Regular monitoring of weather conditions Dismantle gazebos if weather conditions become adverse – i.e. winds approaching 24mph or as per manufacturer’s technical instructions 2 4 8
By (Print Name) Signed By (Print Name) Signed Date_____________ Location______________________Map Reference________________ Subsequent dates___________________________ Hazard Hazard Details Risk Group Actions Planned Risk Additional Actions Proposed. Access Road Dual Carriageway. Single Carriageway. Unclassified. Other: PC Members. PC Officials. Parents. General Public. Animals. Property. Warning signs. Post stewards. High visibility clothing. One way system. Police action. Council action. HIGH ACCEPTABLE LOW Main Entrance & Exit Easy to find? Sufficient turning space for lorries & trailers to prevent restricting access road? Good ground conditions? view from both ways? Wide enough for 2 vehicles? Alternative road gates? Other: PC Members. PC Officials. Parents. General Public. Animals. Property. Direction signs/send map. Widen entrance. No stopping at entrance. One way system. Post stewards. Fill pot holes. Improve visibility - trim hedges etc. Other gates onto roadways closed All gates closed during rally HIGH ACCEPTABLE LOW
On Site Traffic Safe vehicle routes? Safe pedestrian routes? Safe routes? Safe spectator car parking? Safe horse transport parking? Any public right of way? Horse areas fenced & gated? Other: PC Members. PC Officials. Parents. General Public. Animals. Property. Parking area to clearly marked Parking attendants. Restrict vehicle use on site Sign & steward public rights of way. Rope/cone bad HIGH ACCEPTABLE LOW Hazard Hazard Details Risk Group Actions Planned Risk Level Additional Actions Proposed. Instruction Instructors Competent? On PC register? Helpers available? Adequate space Facilities suitable for each ride's ability PC Members. PC Officials. Parents. General Public. Animals. Property. Brief instructors before start. Observe each ride for part of rally Move riders in ride not suitable for their ability or pony. Children left at rally: Contact details for parent Responsible adult at rally Time of collection and person collecting HIGH ACCEPTABLE LOW Indoor School Equipment Stored in arena? Entrance/Exit doors. Arena Surface Spectator area. Warm up area users of stabling etc? Lighting PC Members. PC Officials. Parents. General Public. Animals. Property. Inspect school and spectator areas before start of rally Entrance/Exit doors supervised Supervision of warm up area. Lighting used as required HIGH ACCEPTABLE LOW
All Terrain Vehicles (ATVs) Are they necessary? Well maintained? Other: Refer to PC Guidance. PC Members. PC Officials. Parents. General Public. Animals. Property. Driver 17+ Driver holds current licence. Driver has no serious driving convictions Helmet to be worn Speed to be controlled No passengers Trained operators only Safe terrain Drivers authorised Motor insurance necessary? HIGH ACCEPTABLE LOW
Risk Assessment of Dental Practice Note that a worked example risk assessment template is also provided for reference. Dental Practice Name: Overall Responsibility for Risk Management: Date of Assessment: Potential Areas of Risk Yes/No/ Don’t know Comments Date to be Completed Team Member Responsible Completed (Date) Clinical Risks
Task/Event Hazards How Likely is it to happen? Low = Highly Unlikely Medium = Unlikely High = Possibility How Serious could it be? Low = Minor impact Medium = Moderate Impact High = Serious consequences What action(s) will be taken to reduce or control the risk? Level of risk after action(s) (Low, Medium, High)
Task/Event Hazards How Likely is it to happen? Low = Highly Unlikely Medium = Unlikely High = Possibility How Serious could it be? Low = Minor impact Medium = Moderate Impact High = Serious consequences What action(s) will be to reduce or control the risk? Level of risk after action(s) (Low, Medium, High) Reviewed February 2017 Date of next review: February 2018
Overall Risk Rating (Highest level in final column above) Additional Comments from Risk Assessor (e.g. funding or practical implications) Approved By Position Date Please print a copy, sign it and keep for your records Severity Risk Level Likelihood Superficial Minor Serious Major Extreme Very low Acceptable risk - no action required Unlikely Very low Very low Low Low Moderate Low Tolerable risk - further control measures not required, but status must be monitored Possible Very low Low Low Moderate High Moderate Further control measures required to reduce risk as far as is reasonably practical Likely Low Low Moderate High Very high High Urgent action required to allow activity to continue Very likely Low Moderate High Very high Very high Very high Risk intolerable - activity must until the risk has been reduced Extremely likely Moderate High Very high Very high Very high See ‘’ for further guidance.
Risk Plan for: John Doe as: John Attendance pattern: Monday and Thursday all day Specific Risk Issues for this individual: John is physically able and can hear and see within normal range. John Does not smoke. John Does not have specific choking risks. John is not under medication John is a vulnerable adult. John Does not need assistance in toileting. John recognizes normal street dangers but must be treated as at risk with road safety. John understands and communicates reasonably well but instructions need to be repeated and clear when approaching a hazard. John can give the impression of understanding an issue when he may not- John must be observed at all times Allow John independence but remind him of risks and give him clear instruction. John has experience of handling small animals but can be over confident and ‘charge ahead’ remind John to take his time and be thoughtful to avoid hazards.
Slips and trips Risk of injury if John slips or trips. John must wear appropriate footwear. Warn John of slippy or uneven surfaces when he is near them with specific and appropriate instructions. Reduce hazard by regular sweeping and tidying up. Remind John not to run and to be careful of others and self. Tool Use Risk of injury when using tools. Service users do not use powered tools. John can use hammers, saws, screwdrivers, and mucking out tools such as wheelbarrows, brushes, shovels and forks. John Does not use powered tools. The heaviest tool John can use is a manual 2 lb hammer. John will be under supervision at all times when using tools. John has some small manual tool experience, but he will still be reminded of risk and safe handling each time. Any injuries to be reported in communication book and accident book. Weather John can work outside in all weathers but there are additional risks to be handled Hot weather- sunburn, dehydration Cold weather-cold, ice risk, slips Wet weather- cold+additional slip risk Appropriate clothing (inc footwear) worn for the weather. John reminded to wear layers so he can adjust his temperature. Sun block can be used by John. Frequent hydration breaks in hot weather. Hot drinks available in cold weather. John reminded of increased slip risks in wet weather. Talk about weather and how we feel. Encourage self help and encourage him to say if too hot/cold. Encourage to keep gloves on but allow choice and enable learning. Zoonoses Animal to human disease. Risk of ill-health from contracting diseases from animals. John to wash hands after contact with animals, and especially before eating, drinking (or smoking). All Ill animals are treated by vet and if there is any human risk are not contacted by service users. John can help when safe to do so to look after a sick animal as this is a great way of learning to care for others. John has helped wash a hens foot when she had a cut but remind him we only do that when we need to.
RISK ASSESSMENT FORM Date: ______________ Disability Employment Services provider Name: Employment Service Area: Disability Employment Services provider Contract ID: National Work Experience Programme Host Organisation: Disability Employment Services provider Contact Person: National Work Experience Programme Host contact for this activity: Position in organisation: Telephone:_________________ Fax:_____________________ Telephone:___________________ Fax: _________________________ Is this activity permitted under the Departments personal Accident and General and Products liability insurance? YES / NO Type of Activity: Has this Risk Assessment been conducted as part of the initial site monitoring visit for this activity? YES / NO Name of Activity: Have you confirmed there is a safe and healthy work environment? YES / NO Location of Activity: Does this activity comply with the relevant National Work Experience Programme for Disability Employment Services Guidelines and Reference Material? YES / NO Note: This Risk Assessment Form is a guide only and should be used in conjunction with other references such as: The Risk Assessment for National Work Experience Programme for Disability Employment Services Guidelines; Disability Employment Services Deed; and The Australian Standard for Risk Management AS 4360:2004.
Date Risk Description (including type e.g. organisational/Activity) Potential Impact/Hazards Risk Rating E, H, M, L (See Attachment A) Control Measures/Methods to mitigate risks. For DES provider monitoring purposes only Control measure in place? Y/N Monitoring Frequency (to ensure risk is not escalated) Action taken if control measure not in place