12 2.8 Data Analysis Candidates model and facilitate the effective use of digital tools and resources to systematically collect and analyze student achievement data, interpret results, communicate findings, and implement appropriate interventions to improve instructional practice and maximize student learning. (PSC 2.8/ISTE 2h) 13 STANDARD III Digital Learning Environments 3.1 Classroom Management & Collaborative Learning Candidates model and facilitate effective classroom management and collaborative learning strategies to maximize teacher and student use of digital tools and resources. (PSC 3.1/ISTE 3a) 14 3.2 Managing Digital Tools and Resources Candidates effectively manage digital tools and resources within the context of student learning experiences. (PSC 3.2/ISTE 3b) 15 3.3 Online & Blended Learning Candidates develop, model, and facilitate the use of online and blended learning, digital content, and learning networks to support and extend student learning and expand opportunities and choices for professional learning for teachers and administrators. (PSC 3.3/ISTE 3c) 16 3.4 Adaptive and Assistive Technology Candidates facilitate the use of adaptive and assistive technologies to support individual student learning needs. (PSC 3.4/ISTE 3d) 17 3.5 Basic Troubleshooting Candidates troubleshoot basic software and hardware problems common in digital learning environments. (PSC 3.5/ISTE 3e) 18 3.6 Selecting and Evaluating Digital Tools & Resources Candidates collaborate with teachers and administrators to select and evaluate digital tools and resources for accuracy, suitability, and compatibility with the school technology infrastructure. (PSC 3.6/ISTE 3f) 19 3.7 Communication & Collaboration Candidates utilize digital communication and collaboration tools to communicate locally and globally with students, parents, peers, and the larger community. (PSC 3.7/ISTE 3g) 20 STANDARD IV Digital Citizenship & Responsibility 4.1 Digital Equity Candidates model and promote strategies for achieving equitable access to digital tools and resources and best practices for all students and teachers. (PSC 4.1/ISTE 5a) 21 4.2 Safe, Healthy, Legal & Ethical Use Candidates model and facilitate the safe, healthy, legal, and ethical uses of digital information and technologies. (PSC 4.2/ISTE 5b)
PSC Standards APA formatting is not evident. The standards addressed are not the Georgia PSC/ISTE Instructional Technology/Coaching Standards; OR no standards are addressed. APA format has 1-3 style errors. Is missing 1-2 appropriate Georgia PSC/ISTE Instructional Technology/Coaching Standards that are exemplified by this proposal. APA format. Includes the appropriate Georgia PSC/ISTE Instructional Technology/Coaching Standards that are exemplified by this proposal. Project Description The project description is poorly planned out. Readers cannot envision how objectives will be achieved, what resources will be used, or the timeline planned. The narrative articulates the project but readers are unclear as to how each objective will be achieved; OR an unrealistic timeline is provided; OR the resources needed and responsible parties are not and/or poorly described. The model APA narrative articulates the project such that the reader can envision how the objectives will be achieved. A realistic timeline table is provided. The resources needed and responsible parties are realistic and clearly described. Evaluation Plan The evaluation plan does not show a relationship between the evaluation instruments/methods and the objectives of the project. The evaluation plan provides a narrative that attempts to articulate the relationship between the evaluation methods and the objectives of the project, but questions remain. The timeline is unrealistic. Samples of evaluation instruments or questions are not included. APA narrative. Model evaluation plan provides a narrative that clearly articulates the relationship between the evaluation methods and the objectives of the project. The timeline table is clear and realistic. Samples of evaluation instruments or questions are included and well-developed. References 3 or more references are missing; OR the formatting does not appear to be APA. APA formatting has 1-3 errors; extra references are listed within the proposal; 1-2 references are missing; OR 1-2 references are not considered reliable and trusted by the field. APA formatting is correct; all references listed are cited within the proposal; no references are missing; AND all references are considered reliable and trusted by the field. Current Capstone Status and Comments Comments: Approved: All “Satisfactory” Pending Revision: All at or above “Below Satisfactory” Pending Rewrite: One or more at “Unsatisfactory”