Strategy 2: Carry out the tasks of a PLC Address the most pressing instructional challenges by studying the standards, selecting strategies and assessment techniques, plan and implement lessons, agree on and collect evidence of student learning, analyze the data, reflect and adjust teaching Be continuous learners Focus on student success Point Person Mike Harvey Principal, Karen Mitchell CLC, Admin Team, Department Chairs Evidence of Success (Student Impact) Formative Assessments, Student Schedule, PLC Meeting Minutes Focused on Strategic Instruction Model, Course Organizers, Unit Organizers, RedHawk Connections, Xtreme Reading, Disciplinary Literacy, Six Minute Reading and TOSCRF scores. Funding (estimated cost/ source) None Personnel Involved All Timeline Strategy 3: Support and value the work of PLCs Provide enough time regularly throughout the year for teams to do their work Monitor and give feedback on the work of the PLC in meetings and while implementing in the classroom Provide learning opportunities Empower teachers to be decision-makers Nurture innovation Mike Harvey Principal Karen Mitchell CLC, Team, Department Chairs Master schedule, PLC Meeting Minutes Focused on Strategic Instruction Model, Course Organizers, Unit Organizers, Ongoing Professional Development in the S.I.M., CERs, GRR, Xtreme Reading, and disciplinary literacy. None All Strategy 4: Evaluate the effectiveness of PLCs Review PLC agendas and minutes Mike Harvey Principal Mitchell CLC, Admin Team, Department Chairs HOXIE Classroom Walkthrough Tool, PLC Minute Template, EOC, Common Assessments None All
School Improvement Plan Priority Monroe High School Priority Goals Priority Goal #2: Engage students through the Gradual Release of Responsibility and the Strategic Instructional Model to ensure achievement of learning expectations. Supports District Goal: High achieving and globally competitive students Supports Goal: Every student has a personalized education Data Used: EOG/EOC results Strategies strategy and supporting action steps to address data-identified area of improvement Action Step PD Action Step Reflection/Evaluation Action Step Point Person (Name/Title) Evidence of Success (Student Impact) Funding (estimated cost/ source) Personnel Involved Timeline (Start-End) Strategy 1: Prepare staff to implement the components of the Gradual Release of Responsibility model Participate in the district-provided Gradual Release of Responsibility modules on early release days Mitchell, Elkin Lenis, Danielle Kelley, Lee Casey, Nick Paquette, Mike Harvey Minutes from PLC Meetings, Work Product Produced, Alignment to CLC, Course and Unit organizers, CEU Credits, Walk Through Data None All August 29th 2016 – June 15th, 2018
Strategy 2: Support staff in the implementation of the Gradual Release of Responsibility model Conduct walkthroughs and provide feedback to teachers and PLCs to monitor the implementation of the components Utilize district instructional support staff to coach teachers Point Person (Name/Title) Karen Mitchell, Elkin Lenis, Danielle Kelly, Lee Casey, Nick Paquette, Mike Harvey, Department Chairs, Evidence of Success (Student Impact) Walk Through Data, Minutes from PLC Meetings, Work Product Produced, Alignment to CLC, Course and Unit Organizers, CEU Credits, Walk Through Data, Collaboration with UNCC to support five BTs. Funding (estimated cost/ source) None Personnel Involved All Timeline (Start-End) August 29th 2016 – June 15th, 2018 Strategy 3: Evaluate the effectiveness and fidelity of the implementation of the Gradual Release of Responsibility model Formatively assess the implementation Karen Mitchell, Department Chairs, Mike Harvey, Elkin Lenis Comparative narrative on the differences in walkthrough data, Portfolio development of the walkthrough. None All August 29th 2016 – June 15th, 2018
Strategy 2: Provide the necessary supports to prepare to implement the advocacy structure Implement Redhawk Connections to develop Curriculum in Homeroom periods focused on relationship building, motivation, careers, etc. etc. Point Person (Name/Title) Mitchell, Danielle Kelly, Literacy Leadership Team Evidence of Success (Student Impact) Improved Attendance, Teacher Survey Results, Student Survey Results Funding (estimated cost/ source) None Personnel Involved All Timeline August 29th 2016 – June 15th, 2018 Strategy 3: Implement the advocacy structure Training mentors, supporting CAST Program, Developing Partnerships in the community, Formalize attendance improvement plans YES Academy Redhawk Connections Elkin Lenis, Shep Stewart, Mike Harvey, Lee Casey, Danielle Kelley, Karen Mitchell Mentor Survey, Mentor Data Collection graduation rate, on time course completion, increase extra-curricular participation, YES Academy referral form None All August 29th 2016 – June 15th, 2018 Strategy 4: Evaluate the effectiveness and fidelity of the implementation of advocacy structure Analyze the end of year reports including attendance, survey data, course completions, extra-curricular participation Elkin Lenis, Shep Stewart, Mike Harvey, Lee Casey, Danielle Kelley, Karen Mitchell, Nick Paquette Mentor Survey, Mentor Data Collection graduation rate, on time course completion, increase extra-curricular participation None All August 29th 2016 – June 15th, 2018
Strategy 2: Research and plan for the implementation of MTSS Conduct a core instruction needs assessment and data analysis Use a data-based problem-solving approach to make educational decisions Solicit stakeholders’ input teachers in S.I.M.-CERs and Strategies Train teachers in Xtreme Reading Point Person (Name/Title) Mike Harvey, Karen Mitchell, Danielle Kelley, Lee Casey, Elkin Lenis, Nick Paquette Evidence of Success (Student Impact) Resources for struggling students are provided for structure improvement. Funding (estimated cost/ source) None Personnel Involved All Timeline (Start-End) August 29th 2016 – June 15th, 2018 Strategy 3: capacity and infrastructure for implementation Participate in professional learning and coaching on all of the MTSS components Communicate and collaborate with all stakeholders Mike Harvey, Karen Mitchell, Danielle Kelley, Lee Casey, Elkin Lenis, Nick Paquette PLC Minutes regarding the four questions, ensuring SIM, Course Organizers, New Teacher Training, Walk Through data, None ALL August 29th 2016 – June 15th, 2018
Strategies Research-based strategy and supporting action steps to address data-identified area of improvement Action Step PD Action Step Reflection/Evaluation Action Step Point Person Evidence of Success (Student Impact) Funding (estimated cost/ source) Personnel Involved Timeline (Start-End) Strategy 1: Create a common literacy class—Redhawk Connections Independent Reading Shared Vocabulary A day of shared reading Six minute reader Coaching Modeling Six week PLC feedback to assess program Mike Harvey Principal, Karen Mitchell CLC, Admin Team, Department Chairs TOSCRF-2, Lesson Plans, Unit Organizers, Course Organizers, Vocabulary List None Required All Staff Strategy 2: Differentiate Grade Level Literacy Needs Seniors –Focus on College and Career Readiness Academic tracking through Naviance Juniors – ACT Prep Sophomores – PLAN Preperation Freshman – IXL, Point Person (Name/Title) Mike Harvey Principal, Karen Mitchell CLC, Team, Department Chairs Evidence of Success (Student Impact) Graduation Rate ACT scores PLAN scores EOC ,NCFE, Benchmark data Funding (estimated cost/ source) None Personnel Involved All Timeline (Start-End)
Strategy 3: Implementation of student journals and ACT Work Keys Reading and discussion strategies Guided and Individual Reading Student Journal Responses Train teacher through ongoing PLC’s Mike Harvey Principal Karen Mitchell CLC, Team, Department Chairs Journal Notebook Redhawk Connections Artifacts PLC Agenda and notebook. Marzano’s question frames. None All Strategy 4: Xtreme Reading Mike Harvey Principal Mitchell CLC, Team, Department Chairs Train and implement staff on Xtreme reading strategies. None All School Improvement Plan Peer Review Form (Year 1 Peer Review #1) Vision & Mission Team School Data & Summary Analysis Goal 1 Goal 2 Goal 3 Goal 4 Goal 5 Checklist Safe School Plan Meets all requirements Does Not Meet all requirements
Additional Comments (Please provide specific details for each part of the SIP that does not meet all requirements) Name Signature Date School Improvement Plan Review Form (Year 1 Director Review) Vision & Mission Team School Data & Summary Analysis Goal 1 Goal 2 Goal 3 Goal 4 Goal 5 Checklist Safe School Plan Meets all requirements Does Not Meet all requirements