zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Endangerment of a highway worker, great bodily injury 6” SECTION 5. Section 5651536 of the 1976 Code is repealed. SECTION 6. The repeal or amendment by this act of any law, whether temporary or permanent or civil or criminal, does not affect pending actions, rights, duties, or liabilities founded thereon, or alter, discharge, release or extinguish any penalty, forfeiture, or liability incurred under the repealed or amended law, unless the repealed or amended provision shall so expressly provide. After the effective date of this act, all laws repealed or amended by this act must be taken and treated as remaining in full force and effect for the purpose of sustaining any pending or vested right, civil action, special proceeding, criminal prosecution, or appeal existing as of the effective date of this act, and for the enforcement of rights, duties, penalties, forfeitures, and liabilities as they stood under the repealed or amended laws. SECTION 7. This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor. XX
SECTION 4. Section 561720 of the 1976 Code is amended to read: “Section 561720. There is established a point system for the evaluation of the operating record of persons to whom a license to operate motor vehicles has been granted and for the determination of the continuing qualifications of these persons for the privileges granted by the license to operate motor vehicles. The system shall have as its basic element a graduated scale of points assigning relative values to the various violations in accordance with the following schedule: VIOLATION POINTS Reckless driving 6 Passing stopped school bus 6 Hitandrun, property damages only 6 Driving too fast for conditions, or speeding: (1) No more than 10 m.p.h. above the posted limits 2 (2) More than 10 m.p.h. but less than 25 m.p.h. above the posted limits 4 (3) 25 m.p.h. or above the posted limits 6 Disobedience of any official traffic control device 4 Disobedience to officer directing traffic 4 Failing to yield right-of-way 4 Driving on wrong side of road 4 Passing unlawfully 4 Turning unlawfully 4 Driving through or within safety zone 4 Failing to give signal or giving improper signal for stopping, turning, or suddenly decreased speed 4 Shifting lanes without safety precaution 2 Improper dangerous parking 2 Following too closely 4 Failing to dim lights 2 Operating with improper lights 2 Operating with improper brakes 4 Operating a vehicle in unsafe condition 2 Driving in improper lane 2 Improper backing 2 Endangerment of a highway worker, no injury 2 Endangerment of a highway worker, injury results 4 Endangerment of a highway worker, great bodily injury 6”
Class of 1972 Reunion - 30 November - 2 December 2012 REGISTRATION FORM Please complete this form and return it with your payment, by 15 OCTOBER 2012. Your details name: address: Email and mobile number: Your payment South African Rands please. Forward a copy of your deposit slip by Fax or Email attachment to the contact below. 1. cheque (payable to “UCT”) 2. direct (EFT) deposits Bank: Standard Bank of South Africa, Rondebosch Account name: UCT Sundries Account Branch Code: 02 50 09 Account Number: 07 150 3854 Type of Account: Current Reference: 1972surname120098 eg 1972adams120098 3. internet banking Same as direct deposits swift code SBZAZAJJ (foreign payments) Email notification 4. credit card Authority for payment by CREDIT CARD to the University of Cape Town Please debit my American Express MasterCard Visa Other: specify Amount: Card number Last three digits on back: Expiry date: dd mm yy Today’s date: Signature (essential): …………………………… Our contact Please complete this form and return it with your payment, by 15 OCTOBER 2012. Post: Joan Tuff, Alumni Officer, Faculty of Health Sciences, Private Bag X3, Observatory 7935, SOUTH AFRICA. Fax: +27 (0)86 612 6390 or +27 (0)21 447 8955 (mark for attention: Joan Tuff) Email: joan.tuff@uct.ac.za Programme Fri, 30 Nov 12h30 Registration – MAC Club, Medical School 13h00 Lunch 15h00 Tour of the Heart of Cape Town (Transplant) Museum 18h00 Cocktail party – Wolfson Pavilion Foyer, Institute of Infectious Disease (IIDMM)
VICTORIAN CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL DIVISION LIST P555/2018 TPA/479/76 APPLICANT Dmarc Pty Ltd Monash City Council SUBJECT LAND 19A Hampshire Road, Glen Waverley WHERE HELD Melbourne BEFORE Tracey Bilston-McGillen, Member HEARING TYPE Hearing DATE OF HEARING 7 August 2018 DATE OF ORDER 7 August 2018 Pursuant to section 127 and clause 64 of Schedule 1 of the Victorian Civil & Administrative Tribunal Act 1998, the permit application is amended by substituting for the permit application plans, the following plans filed with the Tribunal: Prepared by: Taylor Reynolds Title: TP00 – TP17 Revision: Revision – VCAT A Dated: 6 July 2018 In application P555/2018 the decision of the responsible authority is set aside. In planning permit application TPA/479/76 a permit is granted and directed to be issued for the land at 19A Hampshire Road, Glen Waverley in accordance with the endorsed plans and the conditions set out in Appendix A. The permit allows: Buildings and works to construct a three storey mixed use building. Tracey Bilston-McGillen Member
Trade Marks Form SM 25 SOUTH-WEST AFRICA TRADE MARKS IN SOUTH-WEST AFRICA ACT, 1973 REQUEST FOR SEARCH (Regulation 69) Revenue stamp, R5 Official datestamp You are hereby requested to search in Class in respect of (state goods/services) to ascertain whether any trade marks are on record which resemble the trade mark sent herewith in duplicate, each mounted on a half sheet of foolscap. Proprietor of mark if registered will be Name and address of person requesting search Dated this day of 19 Signature of applicant or authorised agent To: The Registrar Trade Marks Office for South-West Africa. Trade Marks Form SM 26 SOUTH-WEST AFRICA TRADE MARKS IN SOUTH-WEST AFRICA ACT, 1973 NOTICE OF ORDER OF COURT FOR ALTERATION OR RECTIFICATION OF REGISTER OF TRADE MARKS [Sections 33 (4) and 36 and regulation 75 (1)] Revenue stamp, R1 Official datestamp In the matter of the Trade Mark No registered in Class in the name of Notice is hereby given that by an Order of Court made on the day of 19 it was ordered that
PARENTS’ ESTIMATION OF APPLICANT’S PROFICIENCY IN ENGLISH Speech: ____ excellent ____ good ____ slight ____ none : ____ excellent ____ good ____ slight ____ none Writing: ____ excellent ____ good ____ slight ____ none ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Note! If the child is applying to other English schools in Helsinki/capital area, please mention the schools’ names here. DATE SIGNATURE All further questions should be addressed to School Secretary (please see contact details below). Please send the completed application by email or post to: Mira Teronen, School Secretary Email mira.teronen@hel.fi Ressu Comprehensive School Tel. +358 40 669 4229 PL 3107 00099 Helsingin kaupunki FINLAND www.ressuy.edu.hel.fi
2019 NATIONAL CRIME VICTIMS’ RIGHTS WEEK (NCVRW) Community Awareness Projects (CAP) PROPOSAL APPLICATION Email completed application as attachment to or mail to NCVRW CAP, 5702 Old Sauk Road, Madison, WI 53705. All fields are required. Do not include additional pages or attachments Applications must be received no later than 11:59 pm Eastern Time, Friday, November 2, 2018 Applicants must read and follow the Applicant Guide available at SECTION 1: ORGANIZATIONAL INFORMATION Applicant Agency Mailing Address DUNS Number (9 digits - required) City: State: Zip: Name of Contact Salutation: First: Last: Tel (xxx-xxx-xxxx): Fax (xxx-xxx-xxxx): Amount Requested: $ (Must equal Total Project Cost in Section 3) Email Web Site Type of Organization (select only one) Non-Profit Faith-Based Organization Community Coalition/Grassroots Organization Public/Governmental Agency Tribal Organization Other (describe:) Is the agency/organization suspended or barred from receiving federal funding? Yes No Does the agency require internal confidentiality agreements or statements from employees or contractors that prohibit or otherwise restrict employees or contractors from reporting waste, fraud, or abuse? Yes No Has the lead agency or any of the major project partners received previous NCVRW CAP funding? Yes No If Yes, for which year(s): 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Briefly describe the applicants’ experience providing/advocating crime victims’ rights and services. (250 words).
“The Eolian Harp” “Dejection: An Ode” “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner” (1817 version) “Christabel” “Kubla Khan” Biographia Literaria, Chapters 13 and 14 Thomas De Quincey Confessions of an English Opium Eater WILLIAM GODWIN Caleb Williams FELICIA HEMANS “Casabianca” “Woman and Fame” “Evening Prayer at a Girl’s School” “The Graves of a Household” “The Bride of the Greek Isle” “Properzia Rossi” “Joan of Arc in Rheims” MARIA EDGEWORTH Belinda JOHN KEATS “The Eve of St. Agnes” “Hyperion” “The Fall of Hyperion” “Ode to Psyche” “Ode to a Nightingale” “Ode on a Grecian Urn” “On Sitting Down to Read King Lear Once Again” “On Seeing the Elgin Marbles” “Bright Star, Would I Were as Steadfast as Thou Art” Letters 22 Nov. 1817 to Benjamin Bailey 21-27 December 1817 to George and Tom Keats 3 May 1818 to J. H. Reynolds 25-27 June 1818 to Tom Keats 27 October 1818 to Richard Woodhouse 21 April 1819 to George and Georgiana Keats 21-22 September 1819 to Richard Woodhouse
“Lines written a few miles above Tintern Abbey” “We are Seven” “Nutting” “Michael” “Ode: Intimations of Immortality” “The Solitary Reaper” The Prelude (1805) Books 1, 6, 10, 11, 13 “London, 1802” “Composed Upon Westminster Bridge” Preface to Lyrical Ballads (1800) VICTORIAN MATTHEW ARNOLD “Dover Beach” Culture and Anarchy, Chapter 1 “Sweetness and Light “; Chapter 4 “Hebraism and Hellenism” “The Function of Criticism at the Present Time” CHARLOTTE BRONTË Jane Eyre EMILY BRONTË Wuthering Heights ELIZABETH BARRETT BROWNING “The Cry of the Children” “The Runaway Slave at Pilgrim’s Point” “A Musical Instrument” Sonnets from the Portuguese 21, 22, 28, 43 ROBERT BROWNING Pippa Passes “Love Among the Ruins” “Fra Lippo Lippi” “Childe Roland to the Dark Tower Came” “My Last Duchess” “The Bishop Orders his Tomb at Saint Praxed’s Church” “Porphyria’s Lover” THOMAS CARLYLE “Signs of the Times”
Skills Able to draft documents that clearly communicate information to the intended audience. Able to make effective arrangements for meetings and to take clear notes/minutes of these. Able to communicate information clearly in discussions with colleagues and senior staff. Able to work on own initiative to deliver outcomes. Able to contribute effectively as a member of a team. Able to communicate through the medium of Welsh.
DIPLOMA LEVEL EDUCATOR OR EQUIVALENT Qualification level Educational level comparable to at least an Australian diploma level that meets the level 5 qualification type descriptor under the Australian Qualifications Framework (AQF). Age focus of qualification Early childhood education and care qualifications that include curriculum and supervised work placement to cover the age range from birth to five years of age. Supervised professional experience during qualification At least 240 hours of work placement in an early childhood setting*. *In assessing and determining equivalence, ACECQA will consider evidence of significant work experience to satisfy the supervised professional experience requirement. Curriculum content of qualification Content comparable to the national Australian Diploma of Early Childhood Education and Care (CHC50113) available: ACECQA will consider the following four areas in the assessment process. Child development and care: Provide care for babies and toddlers Provide care for children Develop positive and respectful relationships with children Establish and maintain a safe and healthy environment for children Ensure the health and safety of children Promote and provide healthy food and drinks Establish and implement plans for developing cooperative behaviour Early childhood professional practice: Promote children’s agency Identify and respond to children and young people at risk Provide an emergency first aid response in an education and care setting. Work within a relevant legal and ethical framework Maintain work health and safety Facilitate compliance in an education and care service.
any offence listed— (i) in section 41 of the Counter Terrorism Act 2008; or Yes No (ii) in Schedule 2 to that Act where the court has determined that there is a terrorist connection; Yes No any offence under sections 44 to 46 of the Serious Crime Act 2007 which relates to an offence covered by subparagraph (f); Yes No money laundering within the meaning of sections 340(11) and 415 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002; Yes No an offence in connection with the proceeds of criminal conduct within the meaning of section 93A, 93B or 93C of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 or article 45, 46 or 47 of the Proceeds of Crime (Northern Ireland) Order 1996; Yes No an offence of the Asylum and Immigration (Treatment of Claimants etc.) Act 2004; Yes No an offence under section 59A of the Sexual Offences Act 2003; Yes No an offence under section 71 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 Yes No an offence in connection with the proceeds of drug trafficking within the meaning of section 49, 50 or 51 of the Drug Trafficking Act 1994; or Yes No any other offence within the meaning of Article 57(1) of the Public Contracts Directive— (i) as defined by the law of any jurisdiction outside England and Wales and Northern Ireland; or Yes No (ii) created, after the day on which these Regulations were made, in the law of England and Wales or Northern Ireland. Yes No Note: Non-EU based suppliers should note that 2.1 (n)(i) above requires you to confirm that you have not been convicted of any such offences in your home jurisdiction and/or any other jurisdiction outside of England and Wales and Northern Ireland.
3.Knowledge Knowledge of the barriers and issues facing our client group A/I Knowledge of the local area your service is based in (community groups, services available as well as local demographics) A/I 4. Education – qualifications required for this post Qualified Psychological wellbeing practitioner A/I 5. Personal Positive and outlook and a ‘can do’ attitude A/I Personal resilience and flexible attitude in the face of difficulties A/I Commitment to working towards the Big Life group’s ethos and values, including having a non-judgemental approach A/I Commitment to personal development and willingness to regularly update skills and experience A/I
All facilities involved in the change have an active authorization (permit, standard permit, or PBR). All facilities involved in the change will be qualified facilities at the time the change will occur [10-year-old Best Available Control Technology (BACT)]. Any emission increases will not require major NSR review, based on conducting a netting analysis with appropriate baseline actual emissions to ensure that the net emissions increase is below the threshold for a major modification as defined in . The change will not result in a net increase in allowable emissions. There will not be the emission of a new air contaminant not previously authorized by the permit or PBR. The facility owner or operator shall demonstrate that the change will not adversely affect ambient air quality. What constitutes an active authorization for a facility? A facility that is authorized by one of the following: Permit Standard Permit Permit by Rule What constitutes a “qualified” facility? A “qualified” facility is an existing facility which satisfies one of the following: The facility was issued a permit or a permit amendment no earlier than 120 months before the change will occur. The facility uses an air control method that is at least as effective as the BACT that was required or would have been required for the same class or type of facility by a permit issued 120 months before the change will occur. A facility that was authorized by a PBR or a standard permit and meets the requirements of Subparagraph 2 above (10-year-old BACT).
TO BE COMPLETED BY ASSESSOR Assessor name: Dates of discussion: 1 INDICATE THE PRINCIPAL FOCUS OF THE CLAIM – CHOOSE 1 ONLY AND DELETE ALL OTHERS: Consistent performance in meeting or exceeding targets Maintaining performance in the face of difficulties Mitigating losses and sustaining business viability in recessionary times Creating something that delivered positive results; product, service or market development Improved operations and/or how people work Making significant savings or performance improvement via a new way of doing things Turning a department or business activity around Increasing profit or market share 2 RECOMMENDATION ☐ I recommend the candidate is awarded Chartered Manager Feedback to candidate: ☐ Further revision required, please complete below ☐1st referral ☐ 2nd referral ☐ failed application Feedback to candidate: » appendix a
Trinity College Dublin School of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences QP Forum - MacNeill Lecture Theatre, Thursday 10th April 2014 Programme MORNING SESSION: Chairperson, Dr. Thurloch O Críodáin 9.25 a.m. Welcome by Professor Anne Marie Healy, Head of School 9.30 a.m. ‘The impact of the US FDA Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA) on GMP Compliance’ Dr. Mike Beatrice (President of Validant) 10.15 a.m. Practical advice on how to get ‘Product Serialisation’ up and running Dr. Hugh McMahon (GE Healthcare) & Mr. Eamonn O’Mathuna (ESP) 11.00 a.m. Coffee 11.30 a.m. Parallel sessions for Sterile & Non-Sterile Products Sterile Products MacNeill Theatre Non-Sterile Products Joly Theatre ‘Hot Topics’, Inspection Issues Paul Moody ‘Hot Topics’, Inspection Issues Catherine Neary, Ciara Turley Training Topics Led by Frank Hallinan & Susan Neenan Training Topics Led by Paul Blunnie & Orla Byrne Media Fill Issues Declan Kelly, Alexion Elemental Impurities Paul Blunnie Particulate Contamination Vincent O’Shaughnessy, Amgen Metal Checking in Tablets & Powders David Cassidy, Merck, Swords Quality Risk Management for Excipients Thurloch O Críodáin, Novartis Powder Flow, Die Fill and Tableting in a PAT and QbD Context Csaba Sinka, Leicester University Trends in Inspections FDA/MHRA Tim Mc Dougall, Mylan OR OR QP Quandries* Led by Stan O’Neill, The Compliance Group QP Quandries* Led by Ann McGee, McGee Pharma Int * a number of QPs will present a brief summary of a particular issue which has recently occurred, how it was investigated and the decision making process that was applied. 1.30 p.m. Light Lunch in Concourse AFTERNOON SESSION: Chairperson, Dr. Brendan Griffin 2.15 p.m. GMP & GDP Regulatory Updates Mr. Paul Sexton & Ms. Catherine Neary, Irish Medicines Board 3.00 p.m. ‘A new Job Description for the Quality Professional’ Ms. Jennifer Magnani (Head of Global Quality Genentech USA) 4.00 p.m. Reception in Concourse
a) I am not benefitting, I have not benefitted and I hereby irrevocably waive my right to the benefit under Article 6 of the Income Tax Act; c) I am in receipt of stable and regular resources which are sufficient to maintain myself and my family without recourse to the social assistance system in Malta; d) I reside in an accommodation regarded as normal for a comparable family in Malta and which meets the general health and safety standards in force in Malta; e) I am in possession of a valid travel document; f) I am in possession of a Health Insurance for myself and my family in respect of all risks normally covered for Maltese nationals; g) All income from the qualifying contract of employment is duly declared in my Malta Income Tax Return; h) The minimum amount of income received from the qualifying contract will amount a minimum of €45,000; i) The above information stated in the Application Form and in the Declaration is true and correct. Name and Surname of Applicant: Signature of Applicant: __________________________________ Date: Data Protection A. Contact email address of the Data Protection Officer:
Discuss ethical issues in qualitative research. According to Silverman (2008), qualitative researchers should ask 1) why they are doing the study, 2) if the findings can be of value to the common good, 3) if it will help or protect the people in the study, and 4) what are their own moral, political or personal interests in the study. Generally the same ethical considerations are made as in quantitative research. List the four general guidelines for ethical research (APA): 1. 2. 3. 4. In addition, there are additional ethical considerations involved in qualitative research due to the small number of participants (making anonymity difficult), the sensitive nature of research topics, the long-term research process (which often results in a closer relationship to the participant and effects objectivity), sensitive information that may be uncovered during the research process the difficulty involved in obtaining informed consent without jeopardizing the ecological validity of the results (eg. in covert observations). Outline how each of the following ethical issues could be dealt with in qualitative research: Ethical Issue How to deal with it Informed Consent
1 The learner will Understand quality in businesses The learner must know: Assessment Requirements Evidence Location 1.a What is meant by Total Quality Management (TQM) and quality assurance Learners should explain what is meant by Total Quality Management (TQM) and quality assurance The following assessment methods can be used in the assessment of this standard: Written tasks/questions and answers Oral questions and answers Group discussion Written or pictorial information This list is not exhaustive and other appropriate assessment methods may be used. 1.b The principles of a TQM policy within an organisation Learners should identify the principles of a TQM policy within an organisation 1.c The application of the policy Learners should describe the application of the policy
2 The learner will Understand customer care The learner must know: Assessment Requirements Evidence Location 2.a What is meant by customer care Learners should explain what is meant by customer care The following assessment methods can be used in the assessment of this standard: Written tasks/questions and answers Oral questions and answers Group discussion Written or pictorial information This list is not exhaustive and other appropriate assessment methods may be used. 2.b The principles of a customer care policy within an organisation Learners should identify the principles of a customer care policy within an organisation 2.c The application of the policy Learners should describe the application of the policy
A medical facility does MRIs for sports injuries. Occasionally a test yields inconclusive results and must be repeated. Using the following sample data and n=200, determine the upper and lower control limits for the fraction of retests using two –sigma limits. Is the process in control? (z = 2) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 # 1 2 2 0 2 1 2 0 2 7 3 2 1 # = Number of retests Given the following data for the number of defects per spool of cable, using three-sigma limits, is the process in control? (z = 3) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 # 2 3 1 0 1 3 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 0 # = Number of defects
Items in yellow must be completed by the Campus/Department and submitted to Federal Programs. Campus/Department: Transportation Reference # Entry Fee Only Bus Only Both entry fee and bus Destination of Trip: Total Cost: Date of Trip: QUALITY CONTROL – FIELD TRIPS (form subject to change without notice) Campus/Department Federal Programs Department Required Support Documents Submit for Requisition Submit for Payment Received Missing Revisions 1. Quality Control Worksheet 2. Plan4Learning CIP/DIP GPS indicated on QCW 3. Field Trip/Out-of-School Activity Approval form Signature of Principal/Authorized Administrator Signed by Assistant Superintendent (if required) 4. List of Students (Roster) 5. Field Experience Lesson Plan 6. TEA Justification Form - Field Trips (for fund 211, 212, 214, 215, 255, 263, and 245) Date of trip on form Statement from TEA Field Trips cannot take place at sporting events, or amusement/theme parks 7. Additional items for Entry fee: Online Requisition for entry fee Correct Budget Code (6412) Plan4Learning CIP/DIP GPS indicated on Requisition Description Vendor Invoice/Quote 8. Additional items for SAISD School Bus: (Campus/Department must email their assigned FPD Specialist all supporting documentation per QCW) Transportation Request Reference # on QCW Correct Budget Code (6494) 9. Additional items for Charter Bus: Online Requisition for charter bus Correct Budget Code (6412) Plan4Learning CIP/DIP GPS indicated on Requisition Description Charter bus Invoice/Quote 10. Purchase Order with Signature of Principal/ Authorized Administrator 11. Vendor invoice 12. SAISD Transportation Invoice(s) (FPD use only) 13. List of Students (Roster)
Items in yellow must be completed by the Campus/Department and submitted to Federal Programs. Campus/Department: Location of Service: Consultant/Vendor: Date(s) of Service: Total Cost: QUALITY CONTROL – ONLINE REQUISITIONS (form subject to change without notice) Campus/Department Federal Programs Department Required Support Documents Submit for Requisition Submit for Payment Received Missing Revisions 1. Quality Control Worksheet 2. Plan4Learning CIP/DIP GPS indicated on requisition description 3. Correct budget code(s) 4. Upload all supporting documents into iTCCS 5. Shopping Cart/Quote Requisition with 29 or fewer different items must be itemized Requisition total should match the quote total. Please make sure requisition includes shipping charges if applicable. 6. Quote(s) for technology (refer to Technology Department website) 7. Additional items for Parent and Family Engagement: Upload into iTCCS a copy of the Parent and Family Engagement Calendar Indicate “for Parent and Family Engagement, Not for PTA use” on requisition description 8. Additional items for Tutoring Refreshments: Upload into iTCCS a copy of Notification of tutoring (flyer, schedule, newsletter, PENS system, etc.) 9. Additional items for Equipment (object code 6639): Upload into iTCCS a copy of the TEA Pre-Approved Use of Funds Questionnaire 10. Additional items for Board Approved items: Upload into iTCCS a copy of approved Board Agenda Documents Upload into iTCCS Approved Impact Assessment Form with signature or initial of Authorized Administrator Cost Analysis Form and/or Price Analysis Form for purchases over $150,000 11. Additional items for Online Subscriptions: Indicate start and end date on requisition description 12. Additional items for Science materials using SAISD Science Department budget (sub object 40): Email of approval from SAISD Science Department
Items in yellow must be completed by the Campus/Department and submitted to Federal Programs. One packet is needed for each type of request. Campus/Department: Type of request: Registration Lodging Airline Title of PD: Date(s) of PD: City and State of PD: Total Cost: QUALITY CONTROL – TRAVEL (form subject to change without notice) Campus/Department Federal Programs Department Required Support Documents Submit for Requisition Submit for Payment Received Missing Revisions 1. Quality Control Worksheet 2. Each participant must be itemized in the requisition description with: a. Employee Name b. Employee Title (Note: Purchasing Dept. requires the Employee ID) 3. Correct Budget Code(s) 4. Plan4Learning CIP/DIP GPS indicated on requisition description 5. Signed Trip Authorization form 6. ESSA/SCE Professional Development Form (ESSA/SCE PD Form) 7. Conference Back-up (Agenda/Schedule, Brochure, announcement, etc.) 8. Additional items for Registration packet: Registration Form(s) 9. Additional items for Lodging packet: Lodging Reservation(s) Indicate people who are sharing a room (if applicable) GSA Printout 10. Additional items for Airline packet: Airline Quote 11. Additional items for Out-of-State Travel (for fund 211, 212, 214, 215, 245, 255, 263, and 287): TEA Justification Form-Out of State Includes date of event on form 12. Resubmit copy of items 1-11 above for each type of packet, as backup for payment 13. PO Signed by Authorized Administrator FOR FEDERAL PROGRAMS DEPARMENT USE ONLY: Date Initial Note(s)
Facilitate and continually improve complaint handling system. Perform and coordinate investigations of product returns in a timely manner. Review and approve release of or changes to specifications and drawings, evaluating design change impact, including effect on inspection, verification/validation, risk analysis, sterilization, and biocompatibility Identify areas requiring corrective and preventive action, including those resulting from product. Coordinate activities associated with planning and implementing solutions. Follow up, as required, to ensure effective implementation Provide data collection, review, and analysis of processes supporting production and product quality. Communicate information effectively Quality representative for Material Review Board (MRB) activities. Corrective and Preventive Action Assist in maintenance of CAPA Log or database and coordination of CAPA Review Board meetings Complete assigned CAPA actions Conduct and document verification of implementation and effectiveness of corrective and/or preventive actions Support and participate in inspection and test activities. Review and approve inspection requirements Assist in inspection processes through development of inspection tools and aides; i.e., go/no go gages, visual standards, and reference samples Review and approve first article inspections Determine compliance to specifications. Support Spiration quality management system Perform or assist in hosting internal audits according to approved schedule. Maintain SPC database and expand implementation, as needed. Create/revise SOPs and work instructions. Sterilization and Biocompatibility Assist in coordinating the development of sterilization processes, validation, revalidation, and routine monitoring. Review sterilization test results for final product release. This includes, but is not limited to, EO residuals, sterility, and bacterial endotoxins (pyrogen). Assist in determining applicable biocompatibility requirements for US and international compliance. Coordinate biocompatibility testing with outside laboratories. Trend analysis and data reporting for identified performance measures. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS (To perform this job successfully, an individual must be able to perform each essential duty satisfactorily. The requirements listed below are representative of the, education, knowledge, skill and/or ability required. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions.) EDUCATION BS degree in a technical discipline is required. Evidence of continued learning efforts a plus. EXPERIENCE 2++ years in a medical device manufacturing environment. Previous Quality Engineering experience preferred.
Care plan audits: proportion of people receiving a copy of their care plan or equivalent care plan information The ADASS national survey highlighted good practice around copying care plans to service users, compared with our 2014/15 baseline audit The baseline audit result for 2014/15 was 55% Audit result for 2015/16 was 63% Target: increase to and maintain 95% Related to Adult Social Care Outcomes Framework domain 3 Feedback from service users and carers that they feel involved in decisions regarding their individualized plans of care. In 2014/15 we consulted with our service users and carers; this was a core theme from their feedback. April – November 2015 we scored between 96% and 98% Maintain at least TBC% of our service users and carers agree that they feel involved in decisions regarding their individualised plans of care. NHS Standard Contract section 12 2015-2016. Related to Domain 4 of the 2015/16 NHS outcomes framework NICE guidance: % compliance with relevant NICE guidance (Apr 2013 to date) Increase to 100% Target and baseline TBC Effectiveness Strategy NICE policy Mortality Measure TBC Target & baseline TBC Effectiveness Strategy NICE policy Consultation questions: Are the measures above the most relevant for Effectiveness? Are there any other measures we could use to monitor our progress in improving outcomes? Are these effectiveness measures meaningful to front line teams? (If not, what is needed to make it meaningful?)
Table of Contents…………………………………………………………... P. 1 Executive Summary………………………………………………………... P. 2 Material Provided to Guest Speaker………………………..……………… P. 3 Guest Speaker’s Presentation………………………………………………. P. 4 Write-up of Class 6 Appendix A: PowerPoint Slides Provided to Presenter……………………. P. 8 Appendix B: Take Home Quiz and Answer Key…………………………... P. 21 Appendix C: Slides and Overhead Used in Class Discussion……….…….. P. 24 Appendix D: Cupcake Decorating Instructions……………………………. P. 32
Tracking sheet – Practising Leadership Skills The aim of this unit is to provide an opportunity for learners to demonstrate and then review their leadership skills in an appropriate group situation. This unit is designed for learners who demonstrate leadership potential to individually develop their skills. Please note that as this unit requires the practical demonstration of good leadership skills it is only available at Level 1 and Level 2. Level 1 Learner name Centre name To do this you must Page number Assessment date Understand the skills and qualities needed for leadership Identify effective leaders Give examples of situations that require leadership 1.3 Give examples of the skills and qualities needed for leadership 1.4 Describe own skills and qualities relevant for leadership Be able to prepare for a leadership activity Select a suitable activity to demonstrate own leadership skills 2.2 Describe the skills needed to lead the activity 3. Be able to lead a group activity Communicate the objectives of the activity to the group Lead a group activity 3.3 Give constructive feedback to group members during the activity
Equipment Records The following records are maintained for each item or similar piece of equipment used for testing purposes. Figure : Equipment Records Record ID Record Description Record Location Identity of equipment Asset ID label is located on each piece of equipment. This record is also maintained on the asset module. Manufacturer’s name, model and serial number. This record is maintained on the laboratory asset module. Contact information for the supplier or manufacturer. This record is maintained in the equipment file. A list of suppliers and contacts is maintained in Q-Pulse Date of receipt and entering into service. This record is maintained in the equipment file and in the asset module of Q-Pulse. Current location. This record is maintained on the laboratory asset module of Conditions when received e.g. new, used or reconditioned. This record is maintained in the equipment file. Manufacturer’s instructions/ manual This record is maintained in the equipment file or at the point of use whichever is appropriate. All manufacturers’ instructions are recorded as an external document on Q-Pulse, where available this leads to a link to an electronic copy. Records of equipment’s initial acceptability for use when incorporated into lab. Validation of equipment – Equipment file Calibration of equipment – Equipment file QC – On equipment/ floppy/ hardcopy EQA – EQA file (hardcopy) or through the scheme website Asset module of Q-Pulse Maintenance carried out and scheduled preventative maintenance. PM records, asset module of Q-Pulse Equipment performance records to confirm ongoing acceptance for use. QC – On equipment/ floppy/ hardcopy EQA – EQA file (hardcopy) Damage, malfunction, modification and repair These records are maintained in the equipment file, asset module and as non conformities. The procedure [Management of Quality and Technical Records] details the retention times of the above records Reagents & Consumables 5.3.2.1 General Each laboratory department has a documented procedure for the reception, storage, acceptance testing, and inventory management of reagents and consumables. 5.3.2.2 Reagents & consumables- Reception & storage The laboratory stores received reagents and consumables according to manufacturer’s instructions. Reagent and consumables are stored in designated temperature controlled environments where required.
Clinical Quality & Safety Improvement Strategy ‘Quality Matters’ is the clinical quality and safety improvement strategy for County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust. The purpose of this strategy is to support the delivery of the organisation’s vision, which is as follows: ‘Right First Time, Every Time’ The Trust’s ambition Since 2011, the Trust has been an integrated healthcare provider, providing services in both acute and community settings, supplemented by health improvement services. Through consultation with our staff, we developed our mission statement ‘with you all the way’. This reflects our commitment to provide the best possible care to our patients at all stages along their care pathway and the best possible experience to our patients and staff, using resources wisely. Reflecting these different elements, we also articulated four ‘best’ touchstones to supplement our mission statement. Recently the Trust has reviewed its future direction, with its staff and external stakeholders and has affirmed both: a A vision for the future of ‘Right First Time, Every Time’: we want to ensure that our patients are treated in the right place, by the right clinician, first time and every time, 24/7; and A set of strategic principles setting out standards that our services should meet in order to realise our vision. ‘Quality Matters’ is one of the Trust’s two core strategies for realising our vision, together with our Organisation Development Strategy, ‘Staff Matter’. They will be supported with strategic developments in enabling areas such IT, Estates and Workforce.
QUALITY MATTERS An NQMC update: April 2017 IN THIS ISSUE The Quality Matters bulletin is a new publication for the BreastScreen Australia (BSA) National Quality Management Committee (NQMC). Quality Matters will report on current news, events and opportunities. This issue covers: National Quality Improvement Plan – progress BSA Document Updates Up-to-date Forms Seeking new Surveyors Reporting Requirements Protocols and the Accreditation process Non-target Cohort Reporting ISQua Membership The previous BreastScreen Australia Implementation Bulletin has ceased following the transition of the BSA program to the revised accreditation system. National Quality Improvement Plan The BSA National Quality Improvement Plan (NQIP) provides a framework for supporting collaborative, continuous quality improvement at a national level. The National Priorities for the NQIP 2016-17 include: Developing a Strategic Data Plan Designing and implementing a National Performance Benchmarking Program Establishing a Remote Radiology Research Project The NQIP 2016-17 is available on the CancerScreening website Current progress against the National Priorities is outlined below. The Strategic Data Plan and the National Performance Benchmarking Program have been linked under a broader NQMC Data Directions Project. This comprehensive project incorporates multiple functions to improve the capture and utilisation of available data – including the further streamlining of accreditation forms. A Steering Committee to guide the project is being established and a consultant is being engaged to develop the Strategic Data Plan. The preparatory work for the Remote Radiology Research Project is largely complete and the project will commence shortly. The Governance Committee recently held its initial meeting and the engagement of the preferred contractor to undertake the research project is in progress. BSA Document Updates The NQMC Secretariat, in liaison with the Australian Department of Health, maintains a log of proposed amendments, updates and corrections to the BSA revised accreditation system documentation, including: The BreastScreen Australia Accreditation Handbook; The Data Dictionary; The National Accreditation Standards Commentary; The Data Governance and Management Assessment Framework; and The Protocol Management Checklist. A round of minor updates to the BSA documentation has been drafted through consultation with Program Managers. These updates are in the final stages of completion and revised versions of key BSA documentation will be made available on the Cancer Screening website shortly.
Surveyors are reminded to submit claims in a timely manner following each Survey. Services and SCUs are encouraged to make payments within 28 days of receiving the claim. Evaluation of Revised Accreditation System The Commonwealth is currently planning an evaluation of the revised accreditation system for the BreastScreen Australia program. The evaluation will consider both the change management process from the old to the new system, as well as evaluating the effectiveness of the new system. This work is planned to commence in the last quarter of 2017 and include extensive consultations with relevant stakeholders. The evaluation is expected to be completed in early 2019. Document Improvements Register Please be reminded that the NQMC Secretariat maintains a log of proposed amendments, updates and corrections to the BSA revised accreditation system documentation, including: The BreastScreen Australia Accreditation Handbook; The Data Dictionary; The National Accreditation Standards Commentary; The Data Governance and Management Assessment Framework; and The Protocol Management Checklist. Any document issues or suggestions should be submitted to the Secretariat for consideration by the NQMC. National Surveyor Role The NQMC is pleased to advise that all state and territory governments have confirmed support to continue the role of the National Surveyor for 2017-18.
QUALITY OF CARE TOOL ACTION PLAN - Targeting Particular Item of Care:- Any sub area that has been identified as a concern should be considered as part of an action plan. Current Overall Score Target for change- what do you want to see change for the child – be specific Support to be provided Changes at first review Further Action 1 Physical Care 2 Health 3 Safety
Impact Equitable and durable improvements in human wellbeing and social justice; typically, “projects” aim at levels of impact that can be manifested during their lifetimes, given their resources “programs” aim at “higher level,” longer-term impact Effects Changes in human behavior or in the existence and quality of systems; effects are what beneficiaries do on their own (influenced by the project’s outputs as well as external factors) Outputs The goods and services resulting from project activities Strategic Result (Goal or Intended Impact) The expected change in the lives of children and women; it provides direction for the overall program Key Result The change to whose achievement a program has made a major contribution; one should be able to track and report key results Outcomes United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF) outcomes (results) and Country Program outcomes (results) Outputs Products and services, whose attainment depends on and is mainly attributable to the implementing agency Impact The fundamental intended or unintended change occurring in organizations, communities or systems as a result of program activities within 7 to 10 years Outcomes The specific changes in program participants’ behavior, knowledge, skills, status, and level of functioning; short-term outcomes should be attainable within 1 to 3 years, while outcomes should be achievable within a 4 to 6 year timeframe Outputs Direct results of program activities; usually described in terms of the size and/or scope of the services and products delivered or produced by the program
Dispensing Contractors webinar sessions Quality Payment Scheme Review Point Two – November 2017 Dates AM PM 1st November 2017 12.00-1.00 2nd November 2017 8.00-9.00 3rd November 2017 10.00-11.00 6th November 2017 2.00-3.00 7th November 2017 8.30-9.30 8th November 2017 9.00-10.00 9th November 2017 2.30-3.30 10th November 2017 10.00-11.00 Please send your request as follows to Date: Time: Webinar Subject: Name: Organisation: Email address: Telephone Number:
For each Quality Physical Education Checklist item that received a “No” response, complete the Action Plan for Quality Physical Education. Criteria Action Short Term Objectives/Goals Long Term Objectives/Goals Criteria Met List any items with a “No” response from the checklist. How do you propose to change this to a “Yes” response? List action steps here. List specific goals for the first year. List specific goals for the next 2-3 years. Place the date of completion here.
# Question Who is asked the question? Question/Answer Format I. The interviewer obtains demographic information. 1. Where did the interview take place? Observation The interviewer’s observation is based on the location where the interview was conducted. . Home Work School Provider site (add address): Phone interview Another place (please describe): 2. Do you know what Participant Directed Services (PDS) are authorized? ME The interviewer should have a general understanding of the person’s Individual Service Plan (ISP) (Know and Do section), needs, and services that are authorized to help the person live the life the ME chooses. Yes No Don’t know, please describe II. Measurement is undertaken for quality improvement and ME is satisfied with services rendered by the AWC/FMS provider. 3. Did you receive a survey from the AWC/FMS offering you the opportunity to report your satisfaction or concerns with their performance? ME The interviewer asks the MEs of the selected sample if the ME received a satisfaction survey from the AWC/FMS. It is recommended that the interviewer know the date the last survey was mailed to all participants. Yes, the ME received a survey from the AWC/FMS offering them the opportunity to report their satisfaction with the performance. No, the ME did not receive a survey from the AWC/FMS offering them the opportunity to report their satisfaction with the performance. 4. Did you receive training or assistance from the AWC/FMS on how to report satisfaction or concerns with the services provided by the AWC/FMS? ME The interviewer asks the MEs of the selected sample to describe any trainings the ME received from the AWC/FMS on how to report satisfaction or concerns. Yes, the ME received training and described the training. No, the ME did not receive any training on how to report satisfaction or concerns. 5. Did you receive an evaluation of your performance based upon the following: ODP ME agreement Implementation of training plans Recommendations for corrective action plans and terminations ME The interviewer asks the MEs of the selected sample whether the ME received a performance evaluation based on the following: ODP ME agreement Implementation of training plans Recommendations for any corrective action plans and terminations. Yes, the ME received a performance evaluation. No, the ME did not receive an evaluation.