7. Monitoring & Evaluation Plan IMPACT Objective External M&E Indicator Internal M&E Indicator Focal point Tool M&E Plan Humanitarian stakeholders are accessing IMPACT products Number of humanitarian organisations accessing IMPACT services/products Number of individuals accessing IMPACT services/products # of downloads of x product from Resource Center Country request to HQ User log X Yes □ No # of downloads of x product from Relief Web Country request to HQ X Yes □ No # of downloads of x product from Country level platforms Country team □ Yes X No # of page clicks on x product from REACH global newsletter Country request to HQ X Yes □ No # of page clicks on x product from country newsletter, sendingBlue, bit.ly Country team X Yes □ No # of visits to x webmap/x dashboard Country request to HQ X Yes □ No IMPACT activities contribute to better program implementation and coordination of the humanitarian response Number of humanitarian organisations utilizing IMPACT services/products # references in HPC documents (HNO, SRP, Flash appeals, Cluster/sector strategies) Country team Reference log Humanitarian Needs Overview Humanitarian Response Plan Food Security and Livelihoods Cluster Response Strategy WASH Cluster Response Strategy UNHCR Country Strategy # references in single agency documents Humanitarian stakeholders are using IMPACT products Humanitarian actors use IMPACT evidence/products as a for decision making, aid planning and delivery Perceived relevance of IMPACT country-programs Survey monkey: As part of regular dissemination email, survey monkey sent every six months to assess usage of REACH products.
Number of humanitarian documents (HNO, HRP, cluster/agency strategic plans, etc.) directly informed by IMPACT products Qualitative feedback: Each REACH staff responsible for reporting back to communications manager each time agency requests REACH information or provides feedback on how REACH information has been used Perceived usefulness and influence of IMPACT outputs Recommendations to strengthen IMPACT programs Perceived capacity of IMPACT staff Perceived quality of outputs/programs Recommendations to strengthen IMPACT programs Humanitarian stakeholders are engaged in IMPACT programs throughout the research cycle Number and/or percentage of humanitarian organizations directly contributing to IMPACT programs (providing resources, participating to presentations, etc.) # of organisations providing resources (i.e.staff, vehicles, meeting space, budget, etc.) for activity implementation Country team Engagement log X Yes □ No # of organisations/clusters inputting in research design and joint analysis X Yes □ No # of organisations/clusters attending briefings on findings; X Yes □ No
ANNEX 1: Acronyms REACH Internal team: CC – Country Coordinator SMT – Senior Management Team SAO – Senior Assessment Officer SGO – Senior GIS Officer AO – Assessment officer GO – GIS Officer Clusters: ICWG – Inter Cluster Working Group FSL – Food Security and Livelihoods Cluster WASH – Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Cluster Shelter/NFI – Shelter and Non Food Items Cluster Partners: IOM DTM – International Organization for Migration, Displacement and Tracking Matrix WFP – World Food Programme FAO – Food and Agrciculture Organization – United Nations High Commission for Refugees Data: ACLED – Armed Conflict Location and Event Data (project) FSNMS – Food Security and Nutrition Monitoring Survey CLIMIS – Crop and Livestock Market Information System NIWG – Nutrition Information Working Group