Structure of Value Lot System (Lot A/ Lot B) Introduction To actively encourage SMEs to bid for a place on the Project & Programme Management and Commercial Services Framework, a Value Lot System was introduced comprising of Lot A and Lot B. The Value Lot System incorporated low qualification criteria for Suppliers who wished to bid for Lot A only. This allowed smaller organisations, with less personnel/turnover who otherwise would not have met the qualification criteria, to bid for a Framework place. How it works Suppliers listed under the relevant Framework sub-category should be invited to respond to mini-competitions on the following basis: Suppliers on both Lot A and B should be invited to bid for requirements/call-offs up to an estimated value of £300k. Suppliers on Lot B should be invited to bid for all requirements/call offs with no restriction on value (all requirements/call offs including those up to £300k estimated value and above £300k estimated value). Points to Note Both Lots have identical sub-categories and capability statements. Rate schedules apply to both Lots.
[insert criterion 3] [insert [expand as necessary] Conflicts of Interest: Provide details of actual or potential conflicts of Interests that would arise were you to be appointed, and details of how these conflicts would be mitigated. Discretionary Pass/Fail Commercial Proposal Evaluation: [insert commercial and discretionary pass/fail Evaluation Criteria Weighting [insert criterion 1] [insert weighting/ [expand as necessary] Full contact details of the Consultant’s bid manager For info weighting] weighting]
Technical Evaluation: [insert technical and discretionary pass/fail [Optional] The technical submission must not exceed [insert number] sides of A4 Evaluation Criteria Weighting 1 [insert criterion] [insert 2 [insert criterion] [insert [expand / delete as necessary] [insert Conflicts of Interest: Provide details of actual or potential conflicts of Interests that would arise were you to be appointed, and details of how these conflicts would be mitigated. Discretionary Pass/Fail Commercial Evaluation: [insert commercial [Optional] The commercial submission must not exceed [insert number] sides of A4 Evaluation Criteria Weighting 3 [insert criterion] [insert 4 [insert criterion] [insert [expand / delete as necessary] [insert Table 3, The Employer’s Requirement: The Services: See Appendix [ ] Service Commencement Date: insert Term: insert Price: [delete as applicable: Priced contract with activity schedule Target contract
Time based contract] Special Conditions: [N/A or See Appendix “ ” ] Table 4, The Consultant’s proposal The Consultant (supplier name) is: Proposal Ref: Proposal Date: Bid Manager’s contact details: Conflicts of Interest: Provide details of actual or potential conflicts of Interests that would arise were you to be appointed, and details of how these conflicts would be mitigated. 1 insert your response here: [expand / delete]
1 Role: insert title Framework Grade: The Services: See Appendix [ ] The Services Commencement Date: insert Term: insert 2 Role: insert title Framework Grade: The Services: See Appendix [ ] The Services Commencement Date: insert Term: insert [expand / delete as necessary] Pricing: Day Rate Special Conditions [N/A or See Appendix “ ” ] Table 4, The Consultant’s proposal: The Consultant (supplier name) is Proposal Ref: Proposal Date: Bid Manager’s contact details: Conflicts of Interest: Provide details of actual or potential conflicts of Interests that would arise were you to be appointed, and details of how these conflicts would be mitigated. 1 Consultant Name: (attach CV) Framework Grade: Day Rate: Start: Completion: 2 Consultant Name: (attach CV) Framework Grade: Day Rate: Start: Completion: [expand / delete as Table 3] 7A