zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
ROCHESTER RESTAURANT LIST DIRECTIONS: Take a left out of PSTF onto Scottsville Road - Take a Left onto Jefferson Road FOOD TYPE RESTAURANTS (ZIPCODE) APPROXIMATE DRIVE TIME BBQ Sticky Lips (585) 292-5544 830 Jefferson Rd. 10 Minutes Steak LongHorn Steakhouse (585) 272-9695 680 Jefferson Rd. (14623) 10 Minutes Sports Bar and Grill Tulley’s (585) 272-8900 1225 Jefferson Rd. 10 Minutes Family Red Robin (585) 475-1410 740 Jefferson Rd. (14623) 10 Minutes Steak Bugaboo Creek Steak House (585) 292-5800 935 Jefferson Rd. (14623) 10 Minutes Seafood Red Lobster (585) 424-2060 655 Jefferson Rd. (14623) 10 Minutes Italian Garden (585) 292-0590 532 Jefferson Rd. (14623) 10 Minutes Sports Bar and Grill Mac Gregor’s (585) 427-8410 300 Jefferson Rd. (14623) 5 Minutes Sub Shop Subway (585) 424-5630 376 Jefferson Rd. Suite 16 (14623) 10 Minutes Tacos/ Mexican Mighty Taco (585) 475-9525 410 Jefferson Rd. (14613) 10 Minutes Breakfast Ihop (585) 292-0380 556 Jefferson Rd. (14623) 10 Minutes Fast Food Wendy’s (585) 292-1390 566 Jefferson Rd. (14623) 10 Minutes Italian Macaroni Grill (585) 427-8230 760 Jefferson Rd. (14623) 10 Minutes
activity of providing goods and services involving financial and commercial and industrial aspects. This category is a fair representation of the study since they regularly interact with customers, suppliers, and the products. Information obtained from Kigoma trade office and the Kigoma town council licensing department on trade register indicated that there were two hundred small enterprises businesses registered by the council to operators in the town and four microfinance institutions. These businesses had the following characteristics selling farm produce, horticultural, vegetables, cereals, retailers, and wholesalers of assorted goods and services related business, operating either in fixed location. Table 3.1: Summary of the Target Population S.NO Category No. of Respondents Percentage (%) 1 beneficiaries 20 20% 2 PRIDE beneficiaries 20 20% 3 SACCOS beneficiaries 20 20% 4 MFI’s officials 5 5% 5 Residents of Kigoma Municipality 35 35% 6 Total 100 100% Source: Research Data 2014 The study was intended for 100 respondents who are beneficiaries of 20 women enterprises. They were chosen through a snow ball sampling upon the researcher’s visit to the micro finance institutions where these entrepreneurs had been there for returning the paybacks for the loan they had obtained. A snowball sample is a sampling technique that is appropriate to use in research when the
Now I grow cold upon the ground where I was stalked by dark doom, ‘twas here that I left life’s rocky way under a hunter’s moon. The air of the early morn moor with the sky above my dome, ‘twas here that I ran and with joy loved and royally roamed, Now my legs will nevermore click or clack over my domain fenced with tree gates, ‘twas here that I wooed and won my shy majestic mate. She, my queen of the green woodlands, she was my wife and my empire, ‘twas here that we romanced in the fading summer’s fire, Our charming child, my princess of these grassy hills now cloaked in shade, ‘twas here that she saw her father the monarch in death finally fade. In the chorus of the dancing dawn awakening upon the horizon’s golden ‘twas here that I sang the tune that will drum till the end of nature’s time, They will come with stakes and wood and cross and bow me to the beams, ‘twas here they hacked and tore off my enchanted crown of weeping dreams. The scent of the freshly mown grass mingles with the green pine, ‘twas here that I drank the perfume and nectar of the divine, My eyes glaze, my breathing falters, my clay chills, my soul no more sings, ‘twas here that I finally returned to the hands of my Beloved, the eternal King. "...I now graze upon the sacred acres of my Creator, I shall frolic and run free in the tender fields of endless splendour..."
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS In the Matter of the Marriage of Case No. And Court No. AFFIDAVIT REQUESTING ORDER RESTORING NAME moves the Court to restore: My maiden name of . My previous married name of . VERIFICATION I verify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of Kansas that the foregoing is true and correct. Signed on . ___________________________________ Signature IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS In the Matter of the Marriage of
Governance and Strategy How can the availability and quality of RJ services be governed? Who should be accountable for RJ services? Are there existing groups or committees that could take responsibility? The Government has an ambition that RJ services should be available at all stages of the CJ system. Do you consider that there is scope for your organisation to sign up to this ambition in Nottinghamshire? RJ does not have to be confined to the CJ system. Do you believe there is scope for your organisation to sign up to a strategy that supports Restorative type approaches across the public and voluntary sectors? Final Comments Do you have any useful documents that you send to help us better understand your organisation’s approach to RJ? Do you have any suggestions or comments? you for completing this questionnaire.
No What do we want for the child What needs to be done By When By Whom 1st Core Group Is it getting Better: Are we there yet? RAG ie 2nd Core Group Is it getting Better: Are we there yet? RAG rated ie 1 2 3 4
3rd Core Group Is it getting Better: Are we there yet? RAG rated ie Red/Amber/Green 4th Core Group Progress: Are we there yet? RAG rated ie Red/Amber/Green 5th Core Group Progress: Are we there yet? RAG rated ie Red/Amber/Green 1 2 3 4
Name: Phone: Address: Postcode: Mobile: Work: Email: Education Age education Started: Age when finished education: Briefly list any qualifications you hold including level & grade awarded: Current Housing Situation Please indicate where you are living currently and what the arrangement is: If you are being evicted, when and why: What is the date your tenancy ends and, if applicable, what is the length of notice which needs to be given? There is space on our references form for the details of your current housing provider. SECTION TWO: PERSONAL AND MEDICAL HISTORY Have you ever had counselling, psychotherapy or psychiatry in the past? Yes No Please provide details (Use a separate sheet if you need to)
Please complete your therapist's contact details at the end of the application Have you ever been hospitalised for emotional /psychological problems? Yes No Give details below, including dates and length of hospital stay: Have you ever been part of another residential programme like City Hearts? Yes No If so, what was the result? Please add their details to the references section of this form. We will need to contact them. Do you have a history of self-harm? Yes No Give details below of how frequently this occurs or has occurred in the past: Have you ever had suicidal tendencies or made an attempt before? Yes No Give as much detail as possible of what you planned, including dates: Do you smoke? Yes No How many per day? When did you start smoking? Have you ever tried quitting before? Yes No Are you interested in smoking cessastion? Yes No Please note that City Hearts Housing has a zero tolerance policy for residents smoking within its premises Do you drink alcohol regularly? Yes No What kind of alcohol do you drink, how much & how often? (Please provide as much detail as possible)
environmental water. This included seven species listed under international agreements, including Latham’s snipe, sandpiper, brolgas and magpie geese. Breeding by plumed and Australasian darter was also recorded. 2013–14 Environmental water in the Mehi River and Carole Creek allowed full connection to the Barwon River. This resulted in increased levels of dissolved oxygen and carbon, stimulating the food chain for aquatic species including yabbies and Murray cod. The connection with the Barwon–Darling also improved water quality in refuges and allowed fish passage between river systems. This enabled breeding of spangled perch and bony bream in the Mehi River and Carole Creek. Environmental water benefited the Mallowa Creek wetland, particularly lignum, river cooba, and coolibah woodlands. There was also greater coverage of flat spike-sedge, common nardoo and other native plants. Increased plant abundance strengthens the resilience of these communities to survive dry times and bounce back when conditions improve. Breeding of four native frog species—salmon-striped frog, long-thumbed frog, broad-palmed frog and eastern sign-bearing froglet—was observed in the Mallowa Creek wetland.
Restricted Items In Gateway Reason not in Gateway Contact Primary Secondary Jodi Switzer Ali Aghayan Alarm Services / Security Services Calli Price Alcoholic beverages Travel/Entertainment Frederika Smith Annette Gonzales Ammunition Diana Mina Animals and Tissue IACUC Antibodies – Custom Autoclaves (Steam Sterilizers) Bishop Ali Aghayan John Seaman Rick Alvarado Auctions Not Allowed Price Biohazardous organisms Jamie Bishop Ali Aghayan Biosafety cabinets Jamie Bishop Ali Aghayan Eric Hessell Cable / TV Services Communication Svs/ETS Kevin Schmidt Carpet, coverings & installation Facilities Mgmt / DCS Catering UCEN & Travel/Ent. John Lazarus Charter – Air & Boat Calli Price Charter – Bus Pat Anglin Hector Acuna Construction equipment rental, remodeling or services Facilities Mgmt / DCS Consultants John Seaman Rick Alvarado Jodi Switzer Ali Aghayan Jodi Switzer Ali Aghayan Donations or Gifts Development Drones / Unmanned Aircraft Lee Mudrick UC Drone COE Derick Iverson Bickley Jesse Bickley Nick Nieberding Equipment Rental or Lease Calli Price Facility repairs, renovations (carpentry, electrical, painting, etc.) Design & Construction Firearms Mina Fire extinguishers, fire suppression systems, Fireworks or pyrotechnic devices Joe Harkins Jim White Foreign Purchases / International Purchases TJ Bloominger (gas, LPG, diesel, electric, and electric pallet jacks) John Seaman Rick Alvarado
Restricted Bait Entitlement LICENCE No: A15/ LICENCE HOLDER NAME (operator’s name): MONTH: YEAR: NIL RETURN (tick, if appropriate): VESSEL REGO No’s: PORT OF LANDING: TOTAL DAYS FISHED: NOT TO BE SOLD BAIT ONLY. CATCH DETAILS GRID NUMBER AREA (specify) FISHING METHOD RESTRICTED BAIT NET RESTRICTED BAIT NET RESTRICTED BAIT NET RESTRICTED BAIT NET START DATE FINISH DATE LENGTH OF NET (metres) RETAINED CATCH (list species) (kg) CUT* WEIGHT CUT* WEIGHT CUT* CATFISH sp.) MULLET BLUE THREADFIN (E. tetradactylum) OTHER FISH (specify): MILK SHARK (R. acutus) BLACK TIPPED SHARK (C. tilstoni, C. limbatus) OTHER SHARK (specify species): * (trunk, fillet, gilled & gutted, whole, fins, etc) DISCARDS DISCARDED SPECIES. Record by Number for each activity. Species (specify): RELEASED SPECIES SPECIES INTERACTIONS (including TEPS#) (all species to be released). Record by Number for each fishing activity and whether Dead or Alive. Narrow Sawfish Green Sawfish Dwarf Sawfish Freshwater Sawfish Turtle (note species if possible): Glyphis species Dugong Crocodile Other (specify): #Threatened, Endangered and Protected Species I (print operator’s name) declare that the information on this return is true and accurate. SIGNATURE OF LICENCE HOLDER (operator’s signature): DATE: / /
22 LCD projector No. 1 Unserviceable 23 Hysonic microscope No. 1 Unserviceable 24 Sewing machine No. 1 Surplus 25 Akisa TV 21 colour No. 1 Surplus 26 DVD LG vedio dex No. Surplus 27 CPU No. 19 Unserviceable 28 Computer monitor No. 20 Unserviceable 29 Back up No. 9 Unserviceable 30 Keyboards No. 15 Unserviceable 31 HP printer No. 3 Unserviceable 32 HP printers No. 3 Unserviceable 33 No. 17 Unserviceable 34 Electric type writer No. 4 Unserviceable 35 LCD sonny No. 1 Unserviceable 36 Office hyback No. 9 Unserviceable 37 Riso KS 500 copy printer No. 1 Unserviceable 38 Photocopier Nashuatec MP 2510 No. 1 Unserviceable N. KABARNET KMTC 1. Nissan cabster GK T336 No. 1 Unserviceable 2. Plastic tank 19000 litres top tank No. 1 Unserviceable 3. Tyres size 16 No. 9 Unserviceable 4. Timber (8x1 15 ft) No. 10 Unserviceable 5. Scrap metal No. 2000kg Unserviceable 6. JVC television 29’’ G series No. 1 Unserviceable 7. Mattresses No. 34 Unserviceable O. MOTOR VEHICLES S/No Vehicle Station Qty Condition Unit price 1. GK T099 Mistubishi Rosa Lodwar 1 Unserviceable 2. KAG 924F Nissan civilian Port 1 Unserviceable 3. GK T111 Mistubishi Rosa Port Reitz 1 Unserviceable CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS QUESTIONNAIRE FORM You are requested to give the particulars indicated in part I and either part 2(a), 2(b) or 2(c) whichever applies to your type of business You are advised that it is a serious offence to give false information on this form.
Date: …………………………………………….. Signature of Candidate ………………………………………….. * If Kenya Citizen, indicate under “Citizenship Details” whether by Birth, Naturalization or Registration. ANTI CORRUPTION DECLARATION / COMMITMENT / PLEDGE FORM I/We …………………………………………………………………………… of Post Office Box …………………………………………………………. declare that I / We recognize that Public Procurement is based on a free, fair and competitive tendering process which should not be open to abuse. I/We ……………………………………………………………………….. declare that I/We will not offer or facilitate, directly or indirectly, any inducement or reward to any public officer, their relations or business associates, in connection with tender No. ………………………………………………. for or in the subsequent performance of the contract if I/We am/are successful. Signed by ……………………………… C.E.O. or Authorized Representative. Name …………………………………………….. Designation……………………………………….. Signature …………………………………………. Date ……………………………………………….. In case of sub-contracting Signed by ………………………………….. CEO of the firm to be subcontracted Name …………………………………………………..
CORE PRINCIPLES / ACTIONS ACTION Timescale Led by Outcomes Preventing Crisis and Helping People to Stay Well. A1. Early intervention – protecting people whose circumstances make them vulnerable. I statement – I will be protected in vulnerable circumstances to prevent periods of mental health crisis wherever possible. My crisis care will prevent periods of crisis escalating and will take into consideration the wider determinants of mental health and my support needs in relation to sustained recovery, social inclusion and self-direction. As outlined in WOLVERHAMPTON MENTAL HEALTH RESILIENCE PLAN Sarah Fellows, Kathy Roper and Public Health Lead/s. Monitored by Wolverhampton Mental Health Stakeholder Forum. As outlined in WOLVERHAMPTON MENTAL HEALTH RESILIENCE PLAN INCLUDING: Data Collation re-fresh across agencies to inform Needs Assessment and EIA and of mental health elements of JNSA. Development of MENTAL HEALTH PRIMARY CARE PATHWAYS. Delivery of out puts regarding the wider determinants of mental health (as outlined in attached plan). Community Development work to engage / support vulnerable groups (as outlined in attached plan). Delivery of Mental Health Promotion campaigns (as outlined in attached plan). Delivery of Crisis CPA Plans. Delivery of Suicide Prevention training across providers/ agencies. Delivery of WOLVERHAMPTON MENTAL HEALTH INTEGRATED URGENT CARE PATHWAY.
Appendix A Substance CAS Number Intentionally Added: Yes or No Weight Percent Acrylamide 79-06-1 Bis (2-ethylhexyl) adipate plasticizer DEHA 103-23-1 POLY[OXY(METHYL-1,2-ETHANEDIYL)], ACRYLATES AND ADIPATES SULFONAMIDES, C4-8-ALKANE, PERFLUORO, N-(HYDROXYETHYL)-N-METHYL, REACTION PRODUCTS WITH EPICHLOROHYDRIN, ADIPATES (ESTERS) 91081-99-1 Alkyl phenol Ethoxylate Surfactants APE APEO 9016-45-9 26027-38-3 37205-87-1 68412-54-4 Asbestos 1318-09-8 1332-21-4 12001-28-4 12001-29-5 12172-73-5 12413-45-5 13768-00-8 14464-46-1 14567-73-8 17068-78-9 69278-68-8 77536-66-4 77536-67-5 77641-59-9 81133-20-2 132207-32-0 Benzyl butyl phthalate BBP 85-68-7 Bis(2-methoxyethyl) Phthalate DMEP 117-82-8 Bisphenol A 4,4’-isopropylidenediphenol BPA 80-05-7 Bisphenol A diglycidyl ether BADGE 1675-54-3 Bisphenol F BPF 620-92-8 1333-16-0 Bisphenol F diglycidyl ether BFDGE 2095-03-6 54208-63-8
Butylated Hydroxyanisole (BHA) 25013-16-5 Butylated Hydroxytoluene (BHT) 128-37-0 Borax B4NA2O7.10H2O SODIUM BORATE DECAHYDRATE 1303-96-4 Chlorine bleach 7681-52-9 7778-54-3 DI(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE DEHP 117-81-7 Dibutyl phthalate 1,2-BENZENEDICARBOXYLIC ACID 1,2-DIBUTYL ESTER DBP 84-74-2 diethyl phthalate DEP 84-66-2 117-81-7 diisodecyl phthalate DIDP 26761-40-0 68515-49-1 diisononyl phthalate DINP 28553-12-0 dimethyl phthalate DMP 131-11-3 di-n-hexyl phthalate DnHP 84-75-3 di-n-octyl phthalate 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid DnOP 117-84-0 Epoxidized soybean oil 8013-07-8 Melamine 1,3,5-Triazine-2,4,6-triamine Isomelamine 108-78-1 Nonylphenol Ethoxylate 9016-45-9 Novolac glycidyl ethers NOGE 9003-36-5 9065-82-1 68681-25-6 158163-01-0 Octylphenol Ethoxylate OP OPES 2315-61-9 9004-87-9 26636-32-8 Organic Tin Compounds 7440-31-5 Perflurooctane Sulfonamide PFOS 754-91-6 1763-23-1 2355-31-9 2795-39-3 Perfluorooctanoic Acid PFOA 335-66-0 335-67-1 335-93-3 335-95-5 2395-00-8
Polyvinyl Chloride Polymer PVC 9002-86-2 Post Consumer Recycled Materials N/A Styrene Monomer VinylBenzene 100-42-5 Toluene 108-88-3 Tris (4-Nonyl-phenyl) Phosphite TNPP 26523-78-4
Sign: Date: Section 7 - Declaration of the Data Subject for to act on their behalf (if applicable) I confirm that I am the data subject. I give permission for the person or organisation named below to act on my behalf in relation to my request. I have enclosed the evidence of my identity and confirm that I want my personal data to be sent to my representative at the address below. I understand that the information I have supplied will be used to confirm my identity and help locate the information I have requested. Sign: Date: Name of agent Relationship to Data Subject Address Postcode Email address Section 8 - Our response We aim to respond to your request without undue delay and no later than one calendar month counted from the first working day after we are in receipt of your request, and: proof of your identity, and any further information we have requested this from you) we need to process your request and/or locate and retrieve your personal information. Where it is not possible to respond sooner and the last day before expiry of one calendar month falls over a weekend or on a bank holiday, the latest due date will be treated as the first working day after the weekend or bank holiday. We will always try to reply to you as quickly as we can. If your request is complex, we may need to extend the length of time required to respond. If this applies, we will let you know before you expect to hear back from us. The law says we can extend the length of time to respond by a maximum of a further two calendar months.
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ASEF CAS CDD CDG CH CPF DRG EA EOI IDA IP M&E PAR PDO TCH Agriculture Supplemental Equity Facility Country Assistance Strategy Community Driven Development Community Development Grant Community Helper Country Partnership Framework Disaster Recovery Grant Environmental Assessment Expression of Interest International Development Association Implementation Progress Monitoring and Evaluation Participatory Adaptive Research Project Development Objective Technical Community Helper Regional Vice President: Xiaoqing Yu Country Director: Senior Global Practice Director: Franz Drees-Gross Ede Jorge Ijjasz-Vasquez Practice Manager/Manager: Bassam Ramadan Task Team Leader: Kosuke Anan
Solomon Islands RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM II Contents A. SUMMARY 7 B. PROJECT STATUS 7 C. PROPOSED CHANGES 7 DATA SHEET Solomon Islands Solomon Islands Rural Development Program II (P149282) EAST ASIA AND PACIFIC Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice . Report No: RES23126 . Basic Information Project ID: P149282 Lending Instrument: Investment Project Financing Regional Vice President: Xiaoqing Yu Original EA Category: Partial Assessment (B) Country Director: R. Drees-Gross Current EA Category: Partial Assessment (B) Senior Global Practice Director: Ede Ijjasz-Vasquez Original Approval Date: 21-Nov-2014 Practice Manager/Manager: Bassam Ramadan Current Closing Date: 28-Feb-2020 Team Leader(s): Kosuke Anan . Borrower: Ministry of Finance and Treasury Responsible Agency: Ministry of Development Planning and Aid Coordination . Restructuring Type Form Type: Form Decision Authority: CD Decision Restructuring Level: Level 2 . Financing ( as of 06-Apr-2016 )
The PCC Plan A Primary Care ACO An MCO A Partnership Plan (regardless of whether or not they are attributed to an ACO) Hospital Be in MassHealth’s hospital network (via the MassHealth hospital RFA) Contract with each MCO whose enrollees I want to see (negotiated rate) Contract with each Partnership Plan whose enrollees I want to see (negotiated rate) Professional (e.g., specialist) Be a provider (via MH professional reg/fee schedule) Behavioral Health (BH) Provider Be an in-network provider for MassHealth’s BH Vendor (via contract with the BH Vendor) Contract with each MCO (or that MCO’s BH Vendor if they have one) whose enrollees I want to see (negotiated rate) Contract with each Partnership Plan (or that Plan’s BH Vendor if they have one) whose enrollees I want to see (negotiated rate)
Long-Term Services and Supports (LTSS) Provider Contract with MassHealth as an LTSS provider at the MassHealth fee schedule; LTSS is “wrapped” coverage directly by MassHealth For years 1 and 2, contract with MassHealth as an LTSS provider at the MassHealth fee schedule; LTSS is “wrapped” coverage directly by MassHealth for all members, regardless of model Starting on or year 3, contract with each MCO whose enrollees I want to see (negotiated rate) Starting on or about year 3, contract with each Partnership Plan whose enrollees I want to see (negotiated rate) Pharmacy Contract with MassHealth as an in-network pharmacy provider Contract with each MCO (or that MCO’s pharmacy benefit manager as applicable) whose enrollees I want to see Contract with each Partnership Plan (or that Plan’s pharmacy benefit manager as applicable) whose enrollees I want to see
Introduction Every school must have a staffing structure which has been adopted by the relevant body after consultation with staff and unions. The purpose of this document is to provide headteachers and relevant bodies with guidance on the procedures for carrying out a review of the school staffing structure. This guidance has been drawn up following consultation with headteacher groups and all the recognised trade unions and associations: ASCL, ATL, NAHT, NASUWT, NUT and Unison. This guidance should be read in conjunction with other relevant documents, e.g. School Teachers' Pay and Conditions Document (STPCD), Conditions of Service for School Teachers in England and Wales (Burgundy Book),the National Agreement on Pay and Conditions of Service for support staff (the Green Book) and the school’s Pay Policy. It is recommended that academies which have chosen to continue to use the STPCD, Burgundy Book and/or the Green Book also follow this guidance. Where an academy uses this guidance the word ‘school’ should be taken to refer to the academy. The term 'relevant body' has been used throughout this guidance. In maintained schools this is the governing body. The differing structures of academies means that the academy trust will need to define the relevant body for the purposes of this guidance. Advice and support is available from an . Getting Started A review of a school’s staffing structure should be conducted with a view to ensuring that the management and deployment of all employees and the allocation of responsibilities and duties is effective and focused on teaching and learning to raise standards. All employees and representatives of recognised trade unions must be consulted during the review. Headteachers have a duty to advise and assist the relevant body in conducting the review and preparing an implementation plan The Headteacher will be responsible for conducting a staffing structure review. However, it is recommended that the full relevant body should take responsibility for two specific aspects of the review: approving the structure and implementation plan for consultation approving the final agreed staffing structure and implementation plan following consultation trial
23. Gopinath & Becker, 2000 T1: after, T2: after: 2 months (N= 144) Change in ownership (including staff reduction and changes of benefits) - Independent variables: Procedural justice concerning divestiture commitment ↑ , also over and procedural justice concerning layoffs. Communication commitment ↑ 24. Haruyama et al., 2008 T1: before, T2: during (estimation): 1 year (N=71) Merger (including staff reduction, early retirement plan for 1500 employees). Comparison before and after merger announcement Anxiety↑, impatience↑ poor level physical exercise↑ - 25. Blau, 2007 T1: during, T2: during, T3: during, T4: during: 4 months/4 months/7 months N= 53 (all four waves) Closure or take-over non Independent variables: Legitimacy of closure, procedural justice, change acceptance strain ↓, Change denial strain ↑, Change acceptance intent to sue employer ↓ 26. Häsänen et al., 2011 T1: during, T2: during: 1 year (N=136) Closure (outsourcing and close down) T1-T2: Job induced tension ↓ T1-T2: Job satisfaction (overall) ↑ - 27. Mohr, 2000 T1: before, T2: during: 7 years/ 7 months (N=110) Closure (bankruptcy) - Independent variables: T2 Job insecurity psychosomatic complaints of anxiety over time ↑ Moderation: Job insecurity x support from colleagues/supervisor, perceived individual control, employment possibilities and shorter duration of employment on irascibility/complaints * 28. Fugate et al., 2008 T1: during, T2: during: 1 year (N=141) Several changes (no staff reduction) - Mediation: Negative change appraisal reduced control coping positive emotions, Negative change appraisal increased escape coping negative emotion, Negative emotions predicted sick time used and intentions to quit, which then predicted voluntary turnover. 29. Hansson et al., 2008 T1: during, T2: after: 1 year (N=156) Several changes (no staff reduction)* - Reference group: Stress markers ↓ in change group but ↑ in reference group, cortisol↓ in both groups. Registered sick leave ↑ by 2% in reference group and 7% in change group (unclear if it was sign.).
Scenario 3 The HOD English comes to you to explain that a Year 11 student has produced a completely different piece of writing for her resubmission. It is still an essay on veganism, but it takes a totally different approach to the first effort. She completed the resubmission within the timeframe set. Scenario 4 A Visual Art teacher describes the following resubmission practice. “I collect all the students’ painting portfolios in for marking and awarding a grade. I then give each student individual feedback on what they need to do to improve their work/grade. Students are given 3 weeks to complete their resubmission. A final grade is awarded at this time.”
Project Identification Form (PIF) Project Type: Type of Fund: SCCF PART I: Project Identification Project Title: Scaling up adaptation in Zimbabwe, with a focus on rural livelihoods, by strengthening integrated planning systems. Country(ies): Zimbabwe GEF Project ID 4960 GEF Agency(ies): UNDP GEF Agency Project ID 4713 Executing Partner(s): Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Management Submission Date Re-submission Date 11, 2012 April 20, 2012 GEF Focal Area (s): Climate Change Adaptation Project Duration 48 months Name of parent programme: For SFM/REDD+ Agency Fees 400,000 Area strategy Framework: Focal Area Objectives Expected FA Outcomes Expected FA Outputs Trust Fund Indicative grant amount ($) Indicative co-financing ($) CCA-1 Outcome 1.1: Mainstreamed adaptation in broader development frameworks at country level and in targeted vulnerable areas Output 1.1.1: Adaptation measures and necessary budget allocations included in relevant frameworks SCCF 1,800,000 41,025,000 CCA-2 Outcome 2.2 Strengthened adaptive capacity to reduce risks to economic losses Output 2.2.2 Targeted population groups covered by adequate risk reduction measures SCCF 2,000,000 14,700,000 Sub-total 3,800,000 55,725,000 Project Management SCCF 200,000 2,755,000 Total project costs 4,000,000 58,480,000 Project Framework Project Objective: To reduce the vulnerability of rural communities to the adverse impacts of climate variability and change in Zimbabwe Project Component Grant type Expected Outcomes Expected Outputs Trust Fund Indicative Grant Amount ($) Indicative ($) Component 1:Integrated adaptation planning at District and Provincial levels TA Outcome 1. Adaptation scaled up in two vulnerable Districts of Agro-ecological Region V. Output 1.1 Climate public expenditure and institutional analysis carried out in two vulnerable Districts in region V to determine CCA expenditures and CCA expenditure gaps in District level budgets. Output 1.2 Decentralized Climate Change Adaptation plans developed for two vulnerable districts in Masvingo province in SCCF 800,000 12,700,000 financing
Tebbutt NC, Goldstein D, Shannon J, Dervenis C, Glimelius B, Deakin M, Charnley RM, Lacaine F, Scarfe AG, Middleton MR, Anthoney A, Halloran CM, Mayerle J, Oláh A, Jackson R, Rawcliffe CL, Scarpa A, Bassi C, Büchler MW (2014) Pancreatic cancer hENT1 expression and survival from gemcitabine in patients from the ESPAC-3 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 106(1): djt347 Kaplan E, P (1958) Non-parametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Amer Stat Assoc 53: 457–481 Kleeff J, Korc M, Apte M, La Vecchia C, Johnson CD, Biankin AV, Neale RE, Tempero M, Tuveson DA, Hruban RH, Neoptolemos JP (2016) Pancreatic cancer. Nat Rev Dis Prim 2: 16022 Kondo N, Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T, Hashimoto Y, Nakashima A, Ohge H, Sueda T (2011) Prognostic impact of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase expression on pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients treated with S-1-based adjuvant chemotherapy after surgical resection. J Surg Oncol 104(2): 146–154 N, Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T, Hashimoto Y, Nakashima A, Sueda T (2012) Combined analysis of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 expression predicts survival of pancreatic carcinoma patients treated with adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 chemotherapy after surgical resection. Ann Surg Oncol 19(Suppl 3): 646–655 Longley DB, Harkin DP Johnston PG (2003) 5-fluorouracil: mechanisms of action and clinical strategies. Nat Rev Cancer 3(5): 330-338
Moderate 151 58 (38%) 68 (45%) 25 (17%) 0 (0%) Poor 65 18 (28%) 27 (42%) 18 (28%) 2 (3%) Local invasion No 128 44 (34%) 53 (41%) 30 (23%) 1 (1%) 0.431 Yes 109 39 (36%) 51 (47%) 17 (16%) 2 (2%) Resection Margin R0 127 44 (34%) 55 (42%) 29 (22%) 2 (2%) 0.696 R1 109 41 (38%) 49 (45%) 18 (17%) 1 (1%) Maximum Tumour Diameter <30mm 103 33 (32%) 49 (48%) 19 (18%) 2 (2%) 0.591 >30mm 126 49 (38%) 51 (40%) 25 (20%) 1 (1%) Diabetes mellitus No 182 69 (38%) 76 (42%) 34 (19%) 2 (1%) 0.408 Yes 51 14 (27%) 26 (51%) 11 (21%) 1 (2%) Gender Male 141 52 (37%) 58 (41%) 29 (21%) 2 (1%) 0.847 Female 97 32 (33%) 46 (47%) 18 (19%) 1 (1%) Age <65 117 39 (33%) 53 (45%) 23 (20%) 2 (2%) 0.870 >65 121 45 (37%) 51 (42%) 24 (20%) 1 (1%)
OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR MANIPUR TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY, IMPHAL (A University established under the Manipur Technical University Act, 2016) Website: - / www.mtuonline.in NOTIFICATION Imphal, the 13th July, 2017 No. 8/2/2017-MTU: In continuation to this office notification of even no. dated 15th May, 2016 and based on the merit and suitability of the candidates who have appeared in the interviews, the following candidates are recommended for engagement to the posts of Assistant Professors on Guest Lectureship basis in Manipur Technical University: Sl. No. Name of the Department/Subject Name of the recommended Candidate 1 Civil Engineering 1. Gyanen Takhelmayum 2. Nongmaithem Anand 2 Electronics & Communication Engineering 1. Thingbaijam Rajkumari Chanu 2. Yengkhom Chandrika Devi 3 Electrical Engineering 1. Haobam Jaillendro Khuman 2. Oinam Manganleiba Meetei 4 Computer Science & Engineering 1. Heishnam Rohen Singh 2. Chiranjiv Chingangbam 5 Mechanical Engineering 1. Thongam Thailand Singh 2. Yenkhom Milannar 3. Michael Sukham 6 Mathematics 1. Thokchom Chhatrajit Singh 2. Salam Bidyarani Devi 7 Geology Kakchingtabam Anil Sharma 2. The recommended candidates may join the University by signing the engagement agreement at the office of the undersigned at 2nd Floor, Secured Office Building, North AOC, Imphal on or before 18th July, 2017 during office hours. Sd/ (W. Malemnganba Chenglei) Registrar, Manipur Technical University, Imphal. Copy to: The Vice Chancellor, Manipur Technical University, Imphal Guard File
Organizational Capability Target Associated Critical Tasks Observation and Explanation of Rating Target Rating [Insert Organizational Capability Target 1 from page 1] [Insert Organizational Capability Target 1 Critical from page 1] [Insert Organizational Capability Target 2 from page 1] [Insert Organizational Capability Target 2 Critical from page 1] [Insert Organizational Capability Target 3 from page 1] [Insert Organizational Capability Target 3 Critical Tasks from page 1] Final Core Capability Rating Ratings Key P – Performed without Challenges S – Performed with Some Challenges M – Performed with Challenges U – Unable to be Performed Evaluator Name Evaluator E-mail
Organizational Capability Target Associated Critical Observation Notes and Explanation of Rating Target Rating [Insert Organizational Capability Target 1 from page 1] [Insert Organizational Capability Target 1 Critical Tasks from page 1] [Insert Organizational Capability Target 2 from page 1] [Insert Organizational Capability Target 2 Critical Tasks from page 1] [Insert Organizational Capability Target 3 from page 1] [Insert Organizational Capability Target 3 Critical Tasks from page 1] Final Core Capability Rating Ratings Key P – Performed without Challenges S – Performed with Some Challenges M – Performed with Major Challenges U – Unable to be Performed Evaluator Name Evaluator E-mail Phone
Exercise Name: [Insert exercise name] Exercise Date: [Insert exercise date] Organization/Jurisdiction: [Insert organization or jurisdiction] Venue: [Insert venue name] Response Exercise Objective: [Insert exercise objective] Core Capability: Operational Communications Ensure the capacity for timely communications in support of security, situational awareness, and operations by any and all means available, among and between affected communities in the impact area and all response forces. Organizational Capability Target 1: [Insert customized target based on plans and assessments] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, or SOPs] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, plans, or SOPs] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, plans, or SOPs] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, plans, or SOPs] Source(s): [Insert name of plan, policy, procedure, or reference] Organizational Capability Target 2: [Insert customized target on plans and assessments] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, plans, or SOPs] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, plans, or SOPs] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, plans, or SOPs] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, plans, or SOPs] Source(s): [Insert name of plan, policy, procedure, or reference] Organizational Capability Target 3: [Insert customized target based on plans and assessments] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, plans, or SOPs] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, plans, or SOPs] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, plans, or SOPs] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, plans, or SOPs] Source(s): [Insert name of plan, policy, procedure, or reference]
Organizational Capability Target Associated Critical Observation Notes and Explanation of Rating Target Rating [Insert Organizational Capability Target 1 from page 1] [Insert Organizational Capability Target 1 Critical Tasks from page 1] [Insert Organizational Capability Target 2 from page 1] [Insert Organizational Capability Target 2 Critical Tasks from page 1] [Insert Organizational Capability Target 3 from page 1] [Insert Organizational Capability Target 3 Critical Tasks from page 1] Final Core Capability Rating Ratings Key P – Performed without Challenges S – Performed with Some Challenges M – Performed with Major Challenges U – Unable to be Performed Evaluator Name Evaluator E-mail Phone
Organizational Capability Target Associated Critical Tasks Observation Notes and Explanation of Rating Target Rating Zoos demonstrate a knowledge of biosecurity and the proper use of personal protection equipment (PPE) in the management of a Foreign Animal Disease outbreak Zoos identify a Safety Officer Zoos demonstrate basic knowledge of appropriate biosecurity protocols within their respective institutions Zoos demonstrate knowledge of the appropriate use of PPE Zoos demonstrate knowledge of changes in disposal protocols that may be necessary during a disease outbreak Zoos demonstrate knowledge of appropriate stakeholders who assist in necessary for waste disposal Zoos indicate that they have identified alternative disposal procedures for potential infected materials and wastes Zoos demonstrate that preplanning has occurred for various susceptible species to prevent or manage infection if permitted by and Federal regulatory partners Zoos have identified alternative housing space for susceptible or ill species as needed
Ratings Definitions Performed without Challenges (P) The targets and critical tasks associated with the core capability were completed in a manner that achieved the objective(s) and did not negatively impact the performance of other activities. Performance of this activity did not contribute to additional health and/or safety risks for the public or for emergency workers, and it was conducted in accordance with applicable plans, policies, procedures, regulations, and laws. Performed with Some Challenges (S) The targets and critical tasks associated with the core capability were completed in a manner that achieved the objective(s) and did not negatively impact the performance of other activities. Performance of this activity did not contribute to additional health and/or safety risks for the public or for emergency workers, and it was conducted in accordance with applicable plans, policies, procedures, regulations, and laws. However, opportunities to enhance effectiveness and/or efficiency were identified. Performed with Major Challenges (M) The targets and critical tasks associated with the core capability were completed in a manner that achieved the objective(s), but some or all of the following were observed: demonstrated performance had a negative impact on the performance of other activities; contributed to additional health and/or safety risks for the public or for emergency workers; and/or was not conducted in accordance with applicable plans, policies, procedures, regulations, and laws. Unable to be Performed (U) The targets and critical tasks associated with the core capability were not performed in a manner that achieved the objective(s).
Exercise Name: [Insert exercise name] Exercise Date: [Insert exercise date] Organization/Jurisdiction: [Insert organization or jurisdiction] Venue: [Insert venue name] Response Exercise Objective: [Insert exercise objective] Core Capability: Public Information and Warning Deliver coordinated, prompt, reliable, and actionable information to the whole community through the use of clear, consistent, accessible, and culturally and linguistically appropriate methods to effectively relay information regarding any threat or hazard and, as appropriate, the actions being taken and the assistance being made available. Organizational Capability Target 1: [Insert customized target based on plans and assessments] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, plans, or SOPs] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, plans, or SOPs] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, plans, or SOPs] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, plans, or SOPs] Source(s): [Insert name of plan, policy, procedure, or reference] Organizational Capability Target 2: [Insert customized target based on plans and assessments] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, plans, or SOPs] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, plans, or SOPs] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, plans, or SOPs] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, plans, or SOPs] Source(s): [Insert name of plan, policy, procedure, or reference] Organizational Capability Target 3: [Insert customized target based on plans and assessments] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, plans, or SOPs] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, plans, or SOPs] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, plans, or SOPs] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, plans, or SOPs] Source(s): [Insert name of plan, policy, procedure, or reference]
Organizational Capability Target Associated Critical Tasks Observation Notes and Explanation of Rating Target Rating [Insert Organizational Capability Target 1 from page 1] [Insert Organizational Capability Target 1 Critical Tasks from page 1] [Insert Organizational Capability Target 2 from page 1] [Insert Organizational Capability Target 2 Critical Tasks from page 1] [Insert Organizational Capability Target 3 from page 1] [Insert Organizational Capability Target 3 Critical from page 1] Final Core Capability Rating Ratings Key P – Performed without Challenges S – Performed with Some Challenges M – Performed with Major Challenges U – Unable to be Performed Evaluator Name Evaluator E-mail Phone
Organizational Capability Target Associated Critical Tasks Observation Notes and Explanation of Rating Target Rating [Insert Organizational Capability Target 1 from page 1] [Insert Organizational Capability Target 1 Critical Tasks from page 1] [Insert Organizational Capability Target 2 from page 1] [Insert Organizational Capability Target 2 Critical from page 1] [Insert Organizational Capability Target 3 from page 1] [Insert Organizational Capability Target 3 Critical Tasks from page 1] Final Core Capability Rating Ratings Key P – Performed without Challenges S – Performed with Some Challenges M – Performed with Major Challenges U – Unable to be Performed Evaluator Name Evaluator E-mail Phone
Job Insulation fitters Work experience (none – 1 y, 1 – 5 yrs, more than 5 yrs): 1-5 yrs Number of employees to be recruited*: 30 Initial date of employment (date or text)*: 1.11.-31.12.2017 Duration of employment (less than 11 days, 11 days – 1 mth, 1 – 3 mths, 3 – 6 mths, 6 – 12 mths, more than 12 mths)*: Minimum of 10 months Working time work/part-time/night work/weekend work) and number of hours*: Full-time 40hrs per week Salary: (gross or net) (hour/mth/year) 13,98 €/h + 8,5% vacation compensation Type of employment contract (paid work, commission-based, entrepreneur)*: Paid work If salary is commission-based, specify basic salary** Temporary work agency (yes/no)*: No Client company**: Private recruitment agency (yes/no)*: No Client company**: Job description (enter the actual advertisement text here, the text must not contain special characters or formatting)*: Fire proofing the ventilation pipes and other pipes going through the main building of the nuclear plant site under construction. Their will be a proper run-through of the job at the site. The items below will be published at the end of the job advertisement: Possibility for accommodation: Yes/No Amount of rent** Yes. We will help the workers find reasonable accommodation. Rent estimated 100 € per week.
January 14th 2017 NSJC, Easton College, Juniors 70cm Open 1st, Pebbles, Alice Casburn 2nd, Birchlands Wonder, Charlie Crane 3rd, Fabella, Walker 4th, Rorik K, Rosie Walker 5th, Hoffman, Kiera Bromley Pony British Novice/ 80cm open 1st, Lackamore Flyer, Rosie Walker 2nd, Brookshill Orla, Jessica Cunnington 3rd, Pig Bush Joseph, Gaby Sumner 4th, Fabella, Walker Discovery/90cm 1st, Oakley Mist, Pippa Curran 2nd, Pig Bush Joseph, Gaby Sumner 3rd, Kiltilane Mike, Jade Gemmill 4th, Bacardi III, Courtney Young 5th, Llanidan Huwkyn, Natasha Croll 6th, Opan, Lilly Dodds 7th, Grey Lad V, Amelia Newby 8th, Murphey Lad, Jacob Wright Pony Accumulator 1st, Rhyfendgaid Groten Goch, Alice Casburn 2nd, Tinan Earl Grey, Patrick Thurston 3rd, Brookshill Orla, Jessica Cunnington 4th, Stambrook Messiah, Mollie Harris Newcomers/1.0m 1st, Tinan Earl Grey, Patrick Thurston 2nd, Apaches Blaze, Daisy Procter 3rd, Freddie Bear, Oliver Kidner 4th, Just Out of the Money, India Bussey 5th, Clonlara Stripe, Kelly Wecke Foxhunter/1.10 1st, Fostymana VF Tricehof, Courtney Young 2nd, Westside Menlough, Atiya Bussey 3rd, Ranchwood Latte, India Bussey 4th, Holiday Chase, Daisy Procter 5th, Clonlara Stripe, Kelly Wecke 1.15 members 1st, Ranchwood Latte, India Bussey 2nd, Westside Menlough, Atiya Bussey Un-affiliated/BS Club 70cm Horses 1st, Dixie Doolittle, Bronwyn Bishop 2nd, Daichristu Storm Chaser, Amy Wilson 3rd, Running Brave, India Bussey 4th, Lily, Amy 5th, Allstar X, Vanessa Butler 80cm Horses 1st, Dixie Doolittle, Bronwyn Bishop 2nd, Jackie, Katy Peasley 3rd, Running Brave, India Bussey 4th, Daichristu Storm Chaser, Amy Wilson 5th, Allstar X, Vanessa Butler 90cm Horses 1st, Crystal, Charlotte Peasley 2nd, Jackie, Katy Peasley 3rd, Daichristu Storm Chaser, Amy Wilson 100cm Horses 1st, Dart, Kate Arnold 2nd, Crystal, Katy Peasley
Annex 1: Results Framework and Monitoring . Project Name: National Hydrology Project (P152698) . Results Framework . Project Development Objective Indicators Name of Agency Indicator Name Overall Agency Baseline End Target Baseline End Target Water Resources monitoring stations operated by implementing agencies providing validated data online (Number) 1500.00 5000.00 - Surface stations (Number - Sub-Type: Breakdown) 100.00 1000.00 - Groundwater stations (Number - Sub-Type: Breakdown) 1000.00 5000.00 - Meteorology stations (Number - Sub-Type: Breakdown) 500.00 1500.00 Information products produced under the project made available to the stakeholders (Number) 5.0 50.00 Water Resources Institutions achieving benchmark performance levels (Number) 10.00 25.00 Number of trained clients Number of WRIS unique visitors Beneficiaries that feel project investments reflected their needs (Percentage)??? 0.00 50.00 Water data centers functioning satisfactorily (Number) 10.00 20.00 Annual increase in number of page views (Percentage) 5.00 10.00 Indicator Name Overall Agency Baseline End Target Baseline End Target
Beneficiaries that feel project investments reflected their needs Percentage of users of WRIS satisfied. MRT and ICRR Survey NPMU data centers functioning satisfactorily Measures the performance of the state and national water data centers established or upgraded under Component A. Benchmark standards include the following indicators: required infrastructure for database management, trained staff; data sharing process with center and public; and ease of access. MTRs and ICRR MIS, rating criteria NPMU Annual increase in number of page The target will be set with respect to baseline and cumulative % increase will be the target over project period. This will include both central as well as state WRIS. Annual IndiaWRIS, State WRIS National Water Informatics Center/NPMU will assess based on the criteria for performance. River sub basins publishing water availability report regularly Measures the number of river sub basins (CWC definition) publishing dynamic (monthly/seasonal) accounting for storages, inflow forecast and projected demands. Annual MIS Central and State IAs Critical streamflow forecasting stations with improved lead time Number of critical stations/reservoirs (with major population centers or important infrastructure) where flood forecast is improved with increase in lead time. This will be primarily achieved through integration of forecast models with weather forecast and real time data acquisition systems. Annual States MIS IAs will assess the performance of models. Food risk area benefitted from advanced flood forecasting and management Advanced flood forecasting would include streamflow forecasting, reservoir operation and warning systems. It measures the area historically subject to flooding where flood risk is reduced or averted due to advanced flood forecasting and management introduced or facilitated by the project. The baseline flood affected area will be calculated from Annual MIS NPMU