The log should include for each Finding: the Finding the QA recommendation the open/closed status Preferably the attached template will be used and does not need to be posted as a .pdf. Question: Does the agency need to respond to formal Findings? If so, how? Response: Following the delivery of a QA report, the agency must provide (upload to the IT Dashboard with document type “Agency QA Response”) its own response to new QA Finding(s) and any open Findings from previous reports. The response should clearly outline: The actions to be taken The person responsible The date action will be/was complete Current status of the planned action Preferably the attached template will be used and does not need to be posted as a .pdf. Question: What if I am already reporting using a different technique / format in my QA reports? Answer: QA providers should have a discussion with the assigned Oversight Consultant to determine what makes the most sense for their specific project. Regardless of format, the data provided in the template should be included in the log. Question: Does the agency need to respond to informal observations (or similar) identified in the QA Report? Response: No formal response to observations is required, but is encouraged. Question: When should the agency provide their response to the QA Findings? Response: The agency must post their response to any Findings to the Project Dashboard within five (5) working days of delivery of the final QA report. The response may be a resolution or a plan for resolution.
Question: What if the agency does not have a plan for resolution within five (5) working days? Response: In all cases, the agency must have a finalized plan in place for each new finding and recommendation within thirty (30) calendar days of the delivery of the QA report. Question: What document category should be selected when posting the agency’s response to QA Findings to the Dashboard? Response: The document category is “Agency QA Response”. Question: Why does the new policy require that my QA provider be procured externally? Response: It does not. The QA provider must be independent. This means that the QA provider(s) report outside the project management organizational structure, generally to the project's Executive Sponsor and the State CIO. Question: Doesn’t my IV&V contract provide the necessary QA services? Response: In Washington state government, per the definition of “independent Project QA”, independent Project QA is considered different than product or technical quality assurance which might include testing and other independent verification and validation activities. Question: Do I have to wait for my Investment Plan to be approved before I procure QA services? Response: No. QA provides value to the very early stages of a project, while you develop your Investment Plan. In fact, because the Investment Plan cannot be approved without a readiness assessment, the sooner a QA provider is obtained, the better. Question: If the Investment Plan has already been approved, do we need to go back and complete a readiness assessment? Answer: If QA is actively engaged on the project and already providing monthly reports, then no. However, if QA has not yet engaged, they will need to complete a readiness assessment at the start of their engagement. Based on the results of the readiness assessment, an amendment to the Investment Plan may be necessary. Question: Does the QA provider doing the readiness assessment have to be the same as the QA provider performing ongoing project QA Answer: No. While it may be beneficial to have this continuity, it is not a requirement.