TOTAL for Section i £15,000 Targeted support Desired outcome Chosen action/approach What is the evidence and rationale for this choice? How will you ensure it is implemented well? Staff lead Costs When will you review implementation? A Pupils not on track to achieve ARE in Reading are supported to close the gap Reading Recovery and additional Reading support both in and out of class (AJ, JT and LD) Reading Recovery is a well-known, highly effective intervention for children who struggle with reading The additional reading support is for those children who need to catch up and is delivered by skilled and experienced staff Through observations and tracking entry and exit data SENCO Reading Recovery £25k BRP £24k Books £5k TOTAL £54,000 Termly C Pupils with poor communication skills receive individual support Trained Speech and Language assistants deliver targeted programmes to identified individuals This is a specialist area where identified children benefit from individual support The Education Endowment Fund shows a gain of 5 months for programmes of this type, with larger effects for children from disadvantaged backgrounds Through observations and tracking entry and exit data SENCO F/T S&L asst £13,800 P/T S&L asst £7,500 Resources £500 TOTAL £21,800 Termly TOTAL for Section ii £75,800 Other approaches Desired outcome Chosen action/approach What is the evidence and rationale for this choice? How will you ensure it is implemented well? Staff lead Costs When will you review implementation? D. Children’s emotional and social needs are met at school (assessed through Thrive screenin) and parents are more able to engage with their child’s learning See separate sheet These support mechanisms have been devleoped, evaluated and modified over a few years and we know that they are effective. EEF says Parental Engagement and Social & Emotional learning add 4months and 5 months respectively to children’s progress Qualitative and quantitative data are used to track the impact of these interventions Head and SENCO £175,695 Termly and End of Year E Improved attendance and punctuality Family Support Worker monitors pupils and follow up quickly on absences. Good attendance means that children have access to learning and also that we know they are safe. Through our online recording system of actions and through attendance Head £25,038 Termly
pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate. D. Children’s emotional and social needs are met at school (assessed through ‘Thrive’ screening) and parents are more able to engage with their child’s learning See separate sheet Success Criteria: Children’s emotional and social needs are met at school (assessed through ‘Thrive’ screening) and parents are more able to engage with their child’s learning Outcome: ‘Thrive’ assessments for PP children show average progress of 9% over the year Year 2 ‘additional support’ will be extended over a longer period so that it follows the principles of Quality First Teaching rather than ‘boosting’. This will increase the cost next year. All other provision will continue as it is vital for the well-being of pupils and enables them to be ‘ready to learn’. £175,695 E Improved attendance and punctuality Family Support Worker monitors pupils and follow up quickly on absences. First day response provided by office team Success Criteria: There is a narrower gap between attendance and punctuality for PP children v national ‘other’ than in 2016/17 (Attendance gap of 1.7%/ Lates gap of 1.19%) Outcome: Data not yet published (November 2018) We have a small but significant number of travellers on roll that skews our overall attendance data. When they are removed from the data it shows: Data not published yet (November 2018) £25,038