building moratorium standards for activating bldg. acquisition/relocation housing siting/supply policies for adjusting capital improvements for public facilities for change in land use regulations thresholds for change in bldg code stds VI. Implementation and Monitoring: Involves implementation actions, and tracking plan performance Identifies: roles/responsibilities maintenance (e.g., mock exercises, training) to keep implementers familiar with plan to guide determination of partial/full activation of plan indicators to track outcomes, use of recovery funds, and evaluate and adapt policies Note: All components under each principle are coded, Mentioned = 0, Not Mentioned = 1. Figure 2: Relationship Between Plan Design Options and Planning Process Dimensions Plan Design Options Accounts for Stakeholders ProcessDimensions Relevance of Tasks Time and Resources Information Gathering Stand Alone Communitywide Recovery Plan Core network of interests with stake in communitywide rebuilding Tight focus on recovery and rebuilding work Concentrates on recovery issues Focuses on communitywide rebuilding issues Comprehensive Land Use Plan Wide network of interests with primary interest in land use and development Recovery work competes w more salient issues Diffuses across multiple interdependent urban systems Recovery part of larger analysis dealing with multiple urban systems Emergency Management Plan Area Recovery Plan Interests focused on emergency operations before and after disaster impact Core network of interests with in rebuilding, but might overlook interests in other vulnerable areas Recovery is secondary relative to emergency operations Tight focus on recovery and rebuilding work Primary focus on emergency preparedness and response Concentrates on recovery issues in a single location Focuses on evacuation, sheltering and related emergency issues Focuses on rebuilding, but on single location
Emergency management plan 1.261 0.246 (0.841, 1.891) Small area recovery plan ------ Florida 0.647**** 0.098 (0.551, 0.760) Other states ------ ----------------------- a Negative binomial regression model used due to over dispersion b Poisson regression c Significant level at *p<.10, ** p<.05, ***p<.01, ****p<.001 Table A1: Independent Variables (n=87) Variable Measurement Summary Statistics Source (n is for jurisdiction) Local Planning Process Planning Agency measure: Plan Planning agency involved; n (%) = 9 (10.3%) Content Planning agency not involved n (%) = 78 (89.7%) Analysis Diversity of Number of 9 different categories Mean: 1.17 Plan Groups of stakeholder groups represented s.d.: 2.95 Content on planning steering committee. Range: 16.0 Analysis Plan Design Options1 Two level measures: Plan Comprehensive (Yes) n (%) = 35 (40.2%) Content Stand alone recovery (Yes) n (%) = 9 (10.3%) Analysis Emergency management (Yes) n (%) = 40 (46.0%) Small area (Yes) n (%) = 3 (3.4%) Planning Context Community Rating measure: System (CRS) Community enrolled; n (%) = 67 (69.0%) National Not enrolled n (%) = 27 (31.0%) Insurance Program State Mandated Two-level measure (Not Florida): State laws; Local Recovery Plan Non-mandate state (Florida); n (%) = 28 (32.2%) Interviews with Mandated recovery plan n (%) =59 (67.8%) state planners Population Density The number of persons per Mean: 1,615.89 US Census square mile of land area s.d.: 2,108.71 (2000) Range: 12,492.56 Population Size Total number of persons Mean: 152,501.82 US Census in local jurisdiction s.d.: 337,137.80 (2000) 2,247,536 Population Growth The percent change in population Mean: 24.7% US Census