12 Mapping was conducted on flip chart paper (or similar visual) and all maps were completed: History, Today, Strengths/Accomplishments, People, Preferences, Dreams, Fears, Goals, Next Steps. 90%-100% of the youth 75%-89 % of the 50%-74% of the youth 25%-49% of the Less than 25% of the youth 13 Percentage of youth who identified his or her strengths, goals, roadblocks, and needs for support and help. 80%-100% 75%-89% 50%-74% 25%-49% less than 25% 14 At the end of the initial mapping process, the youth and facilitator identified specific objectives, next steps, and criteria for successful outcomes. for 90%-100% of the youth for 75%-89% of the for 50%-74% of the youth for 25%-49% of the less than 25% of the youth 15 The attended every mapping meeting or notified the facilitator if he or she wanted to cancel the meeting. 100% less than 100% SCORES Fidelity SCORE for Engagement: Total Points: divided by 60 possible total % 2. Initial Plan Development Fully Implemented (4) Mostly (3) Somewhat (2) Minimally (1) Almost (0)
16 The youth and facilitator worked together to identify and invite people who were critical to the accomplishment of the goals to be part of the youth’s team. 90%-100% of the time 75%-89% of the time 50%-74% of the time 25%-49% of the time less than 25% of the time 17 The parent/caregiver was invited to be a member of the youth’s team 90%-100% of the time 75%-89% of the time 50%-74% of the time 25%-49% of the time less than 25% of the time 18 Percentage of parent/caregivers who viewed the futures plan as presented by the youth. 90%-100% 75%-89% 50%-74% 25%-49% less than 25% 19 The first individual youth team meeting was held within 3 weeks of map completion. 100% of the youth 75%-99% of the youth 50%-74% of the youth 25%-49% of the youth less than 25% of the youth 20 All people who attended the team meetings received an orientation to the process prior to the meeting, including what their roles were and how they could contribute. 90%-100% of team members 75%-89% of team members 50%-74% of team members 25%-49% of team members less than 25% of team members 21 Percent of youth who developed the ground rules for the meetings. 90%-100% 75%-89% 50%-74% 25%-49% less than 25% 22 The presented his or her MAPs and needs at the first individualized team meeting and as needed. 80%-100% of the youth 60%-80% of the youth 40%-59% of the youth 20%-39% of the youth less than 20% of the youth 23 The team meeting resulted in a written Youth/Team Plan with goals, objectives, timeframes and persons assigned to each objective. 80%-100% of the youth 50%-79% of the youth 25%-49% of the youth less than 25% of the 0% 2. Initial Plan Development Fully Implemented (4) Mostly (3) Somewhat (2) Minimally (1) Almost Never (0)
24 Data was integrated into the Youth/Team plan. 80%-100% of the time 50%-79% of the time 25%-49% of the time less than 25% of the time 0% 25 The concerns of all team members, especially those of the youth and parent, were considered in the development of the Youth/Team Plan. in 80%-100% in 50%-79% in 25%-49% in less than 25% 0% 26 The Youth/Team plan related directly to the expressed needs and goals of the youth. in 100% of Youth/Team plans in 75%-99% of the plans in 50%-74% of the Youth/Team plans in 25%-49% of the Youth/ Team plans in less than 25% of the Youth/ Team plans SCORE SCORE for Initial Plan Development: Total Points /44 total possible points= % 3. Plan Implementation & Refinement Fully Implemented (4) Mostly (3) Somewhat (2) Minimally (1) Almost Never (0) 27 Meetings were scheduled and held frequently enough to accomplish the futures plan goals (as agreed upon by youth and team members) 80%-100% of the time 50%-79% of the time less than 25% of the time 28 The futures plan, including the youth’s strengths, needs, and the goals were the focus of every meeting. 90%-100% of all meetings 75%-89% of all meetings 50%-74% of all meetings 25%-49% of all meetings less than 25% of all meetings 29 The youth facilitated every meeting as much as he or she could and wanted. 80%-100% of the meetings 50%-79% of the meetings 25%-50% of the meetings less than 25% of the meetings 0% of the meetings