zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
13. Owning Organisation National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death 14. Owning Department Chief Executive 15. Owner Name and Contact Details Name: Dr Marisa Mason Email: mmason@ncepod.org.uk Tel No: 020 7251 9060 Location: London 16. Senior Supporting Official Name Mr Richard Arnold 17. Senior Supporting Official Contact Details Title: Clinical Audit, Quality Standards, Quality Accounts Lead NHSE Tel No: 0113 2545318 Email: richard.arnold@nhs.net Location: Leeds 18. Data Provider - Burden Days 552 18. Data Provider - Burden £ £ 322362.48 18. Frequency One-Off 18. Source Organisations (Number of orgs) Acute Non Foundation Trust (98) , Acute Foundation Trust (86)
26. Publication Links Via our website, and via HQIP's website and specialty association links. 27. Requesting Organisation National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and 28. Collection Method Web based collection, Email, Extract from existing NHS systems, Other electronic (e.g. spreadsheet or disk), Paper 29. NHS Mandate Commitment The Clinical Outcome Review Programmes are commissioned by HQIP on behalf of NHS England, DHSSPS Northern Ireland, the Health Department of the Scottish Government, the Welsh Government, the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man. 30. Changes since last assessment 31. Data in operational systems No 32. for collecting this data from operational systems 33. If the data was not collected, what would the consequences be The quality of care of this group of patients would not improve and patients may die unnecessarily. 34. Is there an impact assessment or No
business case for this collection? If so please attach 35. Process required for others to go through to obtain the data It be very easy. Once published the data would be anonymised and anyone wishing to interrogate it further would be welcome to do so. We provide slide sets on our website so that the findings can be presented locally and an audit toolkit in case people want to repeat the study locally. 36. Keywords Acute , Pancreatitis, Enquiry 37. National / Official statistic NA 38. Method used to the data 39. Why sampling is not used All hospitals are required to take part, however, to reduce burden we the number of cases selected for review to 5 per hospital. 40. Details of any pilots The study design and method has been discussed with a number of NCEPOD Local Reporters to check it is feasible. 41. Equalities dimensions used in the collection Age/Date of Birth, Gender 42. Policy that the collection supports
Suggest use and reference formats used in the DD given as shown in Contact Telephone Number See also: ISB 1508 Telephone Number and Display Description The contact telephone numbers for the main family member or carer identified by the person to hold major responsibility for providing their informal care and support Requirement To enable care to make contact with the main family member or carer to arrange visits or to care when it is more appropriate than contacting the person at the end of life. Source Manual SNOMED CT N/A Read CTV3 N/A Read V2 N/A Data Entry Status Optional Content element number and name 17. Is Main Carer Aware of Person’s Prognosis? DD Element name No DD entry DD Note Format SNOMED/Read codes provided Description Awareness of the prognosis is taken to mean an awareness that the life span is limited. Requirement To enable staff to have open conversations with people and their families about future plans.
N/A Read V2 N/A Data Entry Status Mandatory Content element number and name 20. Key Worker Name if Not Usual GP DD Element name No DD entry DD Note N/A Format Suggest use and reference formats used in the DD and e-gif as shown in Person Full Name See also ISB 1506 Patient Name Input and Display Description A health or social care professional who, with the person approaching the end of life’s consent and agreement, takes a key role in co-ordinating their care and promoting continuity, ensuring the person knows who to access for information and advice. Requirement To identify the lead person for co-ordinating care and who will have an overview of the care being provided for the person and their current situation. Source Manual SNOMED CT N/A Read CTV3 N/A Read V2 N/A Data Status
Manual Data Dictionary SNOMED CT 517111000000103 | Preferred place of death: patient unable to express preference (finding) | 517131000000106 | Preferred place of death: discussion not appropriate (finding) | 766391000000108 | Preferred place of death: patient declined discussion (finding) | 517161000000101 | Preferred place of death: patient undecided (finding) | Read CTV3 XaQzq | Preferred place of death: patient unable to express preference | XaQzr | Preferred place of death: discussion not appropriate | XaXOt | Preferred place of death: patient declined discussion | XaQzt | Preferred place of death: patient undecided | Read V2
15. and Name: Chris Buttery Email: c.buttery@hscic.gov.uk Tel No: 0113252438 Location: Leeds, Trevelyan Square 16. Tom Skrinar 17. Title: Head of Adult Social Care Finance Tel No: 0777 540 6397 Email: tom.skrinar@dh.gsi.gov.uk Location: Whitehall, London 18. Data - 3648 or or
38. used to the data DME 39. Why is not used All councils required in order to allow benchmarking and provide figures at a national level. 40. of any This new return came from the ZBR. Burden assessments have been completed and councils received additional funding from DH during the initiation of the collection. 41. used in the Age/Date of
<insert club/organisation name here> GUIDELINES FOR INTERACTING WITH CHILDREN These guidelines are for coaches and other personnel to protect them from risk and to keep children safe. It is recommended that sporting organisations develop guidelines tailored to the needs and context of their sport. Maintain appropriate boundaries Coaches and personnel in positions of authority should maintain clear: Physical boundaries Use drills to develop fitness, not as a punishment Only use physical contact that is appropriate for the development of a particular skill and has the permission of the athlete Work within sight of others at all times Emotional boundaries Use positive feedback on performance, not negative feedback about the person Be encouraging and avoid put-downs Social boundaries Attend sport related events such as sponsorship and fundraising events, celebrations and annual meetings but do not socialise with athletes outside sporting functions Do not socialise with athletes via social media Sexual boundaries Do not have sexual relationships with athletes you are coaching Do not touch athletes in ways likely to make them feel uncomfortable Minimise physical contact Generally, physical contact with players or participants should be to: Develop sport skills Give sports massage
29. NHS Mandate Commitment PoC is not a public commitment so this is a tricky one – we have also just sent DH a paper to be used to engage the new Minister on PoC and the timelines so I don’t want to overdo this one. Perhaps – this initiative was a key prioirity for the former health Minister in the Coalition Government and it is linked to public commitments to extend the service itself to cover up to 5 years of age and increase the sign-up figures by 200,000 people by March 2016. 30. Changes since last assessment 31. Data in operational systems Yes 32. Plans for collecting this data from operational systems 33. If the data was not collected, what would the consequences be At the moment the data extraction is on voluntary basis 34. Is there an impact assessment or business case for this collection? If so please attach No
The collection aims to fill in the gaps that are currently present in the KH03 collection, and give a more complete picture of capacity at all levels of the system. This is a one off to provide a baseline of system capacity which will be used in conjunction with demand and capacity/forecasting/scenario modelling tools currently being developed. This collection will also be used to inform recommended changes to existing collections. 7. Submitted to ROCR 8. ROCR Reference No 9. Start Date 31/05/2015 10. End Date 30/06/2015 11. FT Collection Type MANDATORY 12. Collection Type MANDATORY 13. Owning Organisation NHS England 14. Owning Department Operations Directorate 15. Owner Name and Contact Details Name: Clare Hiblin Email: clare.hiblin@nhs.net Tel No: 0113 8250734 Location: 5E15 QH
13. Owning Organisation Department of Health 14. Owning Department 15. Owner Name and Contact Details Name: Pauline Fleck Email: pauline.fleck@dh.gsi.gov.uk Tel No: 0113 254 5772 Location: 2W12 Quarry House Leeds 16. Senior Supporting Official Name Tim Sands 17. Senior Supporting Official Contact Details Title: Deputy Director Tel No: 0113 254 6911 Email: tim.sands@dh.gsi.gov.uk Location: 2W12 Quarry House Leeds 18. Data Provider - Burden Days 61.2 18. Data Provider - Burden £ £ 32399.28 18. Frequency One-Off 18. Source Organisations (Number of orgs) Care Foundation Trust (2) , Ambulance Foundation Trust (5) , Acute Foundation Trust (102) , Mental Health Foundation Trust (44)
11. FT Collection Type MANDATORY 12. Collection Type MANDATORY 13. Owning Organisation NHS England 14. Owning Department Mental Health Clinical Policy and Strategy 15. Owner Name and Contact Details Name: Becki Hemming Email: becki.hemming@nhs.net Tel No: 07721 231 733 Location: Skipton House, 80 London Road, SE1 6LH 16. Senior Supporting Official Name Martin McShane 17. Senior Supporting Official Contact Details Title: Medical Director for Long Term Conditions Email: m.mcshane@nhs.net Location: Skipton House, 80 London Road, SE1 6LH 18. Data Provider - Burden Days 512 18. Data Provider - Burden £ £ 207643.2 18. Frequency Monthly
13. Owning Health and Social Care Information Centre 14. Owning Department GP Systems of Choice 15. Owner Name and Contact Details Name: Toto Gronlund Email: t.gronlund@hscic.gov.uk Tel No: 07554 115668 Location: Bridgewater Place 16. Senior Supporting Official Name Tracey Watson 17. Senior Supporting Official Contact Details Title: Head of Commercials and Partners, Digital Technology Tel No: 07901 931 864 Email: tracey.watson8@nhs.net Location: Quarry House 18. Data Provider - Burden Days 32 18. Data Provider - Burden £ £ 19520.48 18. Frequency One-Off
34. Is there an impact assessment or business case for this collection? If so please attach Yes 35. Process required for others to go through to obtain the data Access to anonymous HFEA data is available via our website. Researchers can apply to our Register Research Panel for us of patient level data. - see details on website - http://www.hfea.gov.uk/5447.html 36. Keywords 37. National / Official statistic Official 38. Method used to store the data 39. Why sampling is not used The HFEA has a statutory duty to collect information on every IVF treatment. 40. Details of any pilots The HFEA has conducted and consultation exercise (in 2014) with public and stakeholders on proposals to change to current data collection system. This is part of larger project to redevelop HFEA IT infrastructure, collection methods, reporting and website called Information for Quality. 41. Equalities dimensions used in the collection Age/Date of Birth, Gender, Ethnicity (NHS standard 16 + 1), Disability
Contact Details Email: jane.campbell@dh.gsi.gov.uk Location: Quarry House, Leeds 18. Data Provider - Burden Days 1013.33 18. Data Provider - Burden £ £ 329352.79 18. Frequency Annual 18. Source Organisations (Number of orgs) Local Authorities (152) 19. Set Up Costs £ 2669.82 20. Other Costs £ 50000.0 21. Total Costs £ 382022.61 22. Please explain the reason for any increase or decrease in burden and provide details of the any other costs figure provided in Q20 N/A new collection. Costs (Q19 & 20) were derived from a sample of local authorities. The HSCIC stakeholder group includes representation from seven local authorities. Four responses were returned. Three provided responses for Q18, with two of those providing figures for Q's 19. Another local authority provided costs, but no days/hours/minutes. The amounts above are an average. Another council provided costs, but no days/hours/minutes. The estimate of £50k for other costs for this work covers collection mechanisms, development, consultations, validation, analysis and publication of the data.
23. Benefits to Patients and the NHS Benefit of identifying extent of uptake of DPA's and how well local authorities are complying with the regulations. DPA's are intended to reduce the stress and anxiety on individual and their families when the need for social care support arises and full cost or contributions are required to secure that support. 24. Financial benefits to running this collection Can support financial planning by government and local authorities. 25. Publication methods Written National Statistics report. Associated data tables and dataset available on our website. 26. Publication http://www.hscic.gov.uk/home Precise location TBC 27. Requesting Organisation Department of Health 28. Collection Method Web based collection, Other electronic (e.g. spreadsheet or disk) 29. NHS Mandate Commitment Social Care mandate - Care Act 2014 30. Changes since last assessment 31. Data in operational systems Yes 32. Plans for collecting this data from N/A
39. Why sampling is not used All local authorities required in order to provide figures at a national level. 40. Details of any pilots Consultation report attached. 41. Equalities dimensions used in the collection Age/Date of Birth 42. Policy that the collection supports 43. IG Data type Aggregate, Business confidential
7. State Submitted to ROCR 8. ROCR No SCCI2161 9. Start Date 01/04/2016 10. End Date 31/03/2019 11. FT Type NOT REQUIRED 12. Type PART MANDATORY 13. Health and Social Care Information Centre 14. Social Care Statistics 15. Owner Name Name: Katharine Robbins Email: katharine.robbins@hscic.gov.uk
and Details Tel No: 01132547047 Location: Tevelyan Square 16. Senior Official Name Jane Campbell 17. Senior Official Details Title: Adult Social Care Informatics Policy Lead Tel No: 0113 2546996 Email: Jane.Campbell@dh.gsi.gov.uk Location: Quarry House 18. Data - Burden Days 6981.87 18. Data - Burden £ £ 1793507.38 18. Annual 18. Source Local Authorities (152)
of orgs) 19. Set Up Costs 20. Other Costs 21. Total Costs £ 1793507.38 22. Please the reason for any or in burden and details of the any other costs figure in Q20 As part of the ZBR process the burden on councils of developing/adapting their case management systems was reviewed by DH. As a result local authorities were awarded funding to facilitate the introduction of the new reporting classification within their systems. This money was intended to be used for any set up costs.
Part 1: NHS England’s specialised commissioning strategy and communication This part of the survey covers NHS England’s specialised commissioning strategy and communication with your clinical commissioning group. To what extent do you agree with the following statements? Planning for services Strongly agree Agree Neither agree or disagree Disagree Strongly disagree NHS England communicated a clear plan for the commissioning of specialised services in time for my CCG to plan our services before the financial year started. For 2013-14 For 2014-15 For 2015-16 My CCG had to change our service plans because of changes to the arrangements for specialised services by NHS England. During During During NHS England has communicated a clear plan for the commissioning of specialised services. For 2016-17 For the next 2-4 years For the next 5-10 years (long-term)
11. FT Collection Type VOLUNTARY 12. Collection Type VOLUNTARY 13. Owning Organisation Department of Health 14. Owning Department Strategy and External Relations Directorate 15. Owner Name and Contact Details Name: Sonja Lardeau Email: sonja.lardeau@dh.gsi.gov.uk Tel No: 020 7972 1210 Location: 79 Whitehall, SW1A 2NS 16. Senior Supporting Official Name Sarah Gibbons 17. Senior Supporting Official Contact Details Title: Head of Performance and Improvement (Communications) Tel No: 020 7210 4956 Email: sarah.gibbons@dh.gsi.gov.uk Location: Department of Health, 79 Whitehall, SW1A 2NS 18. Data Provider - Burden Days 58.4
DH to evaluate whether key messages to staff about efficiencies, quality, modernisation etc are being received and understood. 24. Financial benefits to running this collection The NHS will benefit overall from NHS staff being aware of DH initiatives/policy and understanding how it relates to their own work setting. NHS Staff will be able to participate fully in not only efficiency savings but also promoting campaigns around obesity, diabetes, drinking etc which will ultimately reduce the burden on the NHS over time. 25. Publication methods We are intending on sharing the information within DH and within NHS England, if applicable. All previous NHS Staff Tracker surveys have also been published on the DH website. 26. Publication Links 27. Requesting Organisation GfK NOP 28. Collection Method Web based collection, Telephone 29. NHS Mandate Commitment The NHS staff tracker will provide us with important information on staff perceptions of many areas covered by the NHS five-year forward view and the success of measures already introduced as part of it. It also seeks to understand better staff perceptions on many areas addressed in the NHS Mandate such as 7 Day Services and Preventing ill health and improving access to treatment. 30. Changes since last assessment
15. Name and Contact Details Name: Lee Harrison Email: l.harrison1@nhs.net Tel No: 07900715426 Location: Quarry House 16. Senior Supporting Official Name Tracey Grainger 17. Senior Supporting Official Contact Details Title: Head of Digital Primary Care Development Tel No: 07917 277858 Email: traceygrainger@nhs.net Location: Quarry House 18. Data Provider - Burden Days 84.8 18. Data Provider - Burden £ £ 54252.5 18. Frequency Annual 18. Source Organisations (Number of orgs) Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) (212) , Commissioning Support Units (CSU) (24) 19. Set Up Costs £ 10000 20. Other Costs £
running this collection purpose. It will give NHS England a greater view of the digital maturity landscape, which will allow for greater clarity in financial decision making. As previously mentioned, it will also reduce the overall burden on CCGs by streamlining their data collation processes regarding digital technology. 25. Publication methods The data will be published on the Primary Care Web Tool which is available to NHS staff. 26. Publication Links www.primarycare.nhs.uk 27. Requesting Organisation NHS England 28. Collection Method Web based collection, Other electronic (e.g. spreadsheet or disk), Unify2 29. NHS Mandate Commitment 5 Year Forward View GPIT Operating Model NIB Framework NHS England Business Plan 30. Changes since last assessment 31. Data in operational systems No 32. Plans for collecting this data from operational systems N/A 33. If the data was not collected, CCGs would not be able to have a clear view of where finances need to be allocated in order to bring the digital maturity of GP practices up to the national
18. Frequency One-Off 18. Source Organisations (Number of orgs) Acute Foundation Trust (80) 19. Set Up £ 0 20. Other Costs £ 2000 21. Total Costs £ 9936.16 22. Please explain the reason for any increase or decrease in burden and provide details of the any other costs figure provided in Q20 No set up costs are required for this exercise. Other costs will be paid for by PHE England (data collection, analysis and publication) 23. Benefits to Patients and the NHS The data collection will be imperative to ensure that appropriate staff are trained, in the correct numbers, at the required level to ensure that the breast screening eligible population can be screened going forwards in the context of one third of the radiology workforce retiring over the next 10 years. 24. Financial benefits to running this collection All breast services are expected to complete the collection. There will be financial benefits to the NHS as new ways of running the service are sought by maximising the utilisation of lower salaried staff in work which is currently undertaken by higher paid staff.
can be improved. The collection will comprise four monthly manual surveys collecting cumulative uptake data on influenza vaccinations administered to children of reception and school years 1-4 age from 1 September 2017 to end of January 2018 at Local Authority level. 7. Submitted to BAAS 8. BAAS No SCCI2195 Amd 47/2016 9. Start Date 01/09/2017 10. End Date 28/02/2018 11. FT Type NOT REQUIRED 12. Type MANDATORY 13. Public Health England
Figure 4-1 Inertial loading - Sample calculation Given: Door system subjected to a 30g deceleration Average Push-Button Spring Output Force = 0.459kgf Pawl Spring Output Torque = 0.0459kgf m a = 30g (m/s2) F = ma = m*30g = m*294.2 M1 = 0.0163kg M2 = 0.0227kg M3 = 0.0122kg M4 = 0.0422kg d1 = 31.50mm d2 = 10.67mm d3 = 4.83mm d4 = 31.50mm d5 = 37.59mm d6 = 1.90mm denotes the cg of component F1 = M1 x a - Average load on knob spring = (0.0163kg x 30g) - 0.459kgf = 0.03kgf F2 = M2 x a = 0.0227kg x 30g = 0.681kgf F3 = M3/2 x a = 0.0122kg/2 x 30g = 0.183kgf Σ Mo = F1 x d1 + F2 x d2 - F3 x d3 = 0.03 x 31.5 + 0.681 x 10.67 - 0.183 x 4.83 = 7.33kgf mm F5 = Mo/d4 = 7.33/31.5 = 0.2328kgf F6 = M4 x a = 0.0422kg x 30g = 1.266kgf Σ Mo = Pawl spring output torque- (F5 d5 + F6 d6)/1000 = 0.0459 - (0.2328 x 37.59 + 1.266 x 1.9)/1000 = 0.0347kgf m Table 4-1 Acceleration pulse corridor Upper Bound Lower Bound Time (ms) Acceleration (g) Point Time (ms) Acceleration (g) A 0 6 E 5 0 B 20 36 F 25 30 C 60 36 G 55 30 D 100 0 H 70 0 Figure 4-2 Acceleration pulse Figure 4-3 Vehicle coordinate reference system for inertial testing
Proposal for ROCR Approval 1. Record Type? New 2. Unique Number R01245 3. Title Primary Care Extended Access 4. Collection Type National 5. Other Reference 6. Description A new bi-annual (six monthly) data collection which was announced in a letter from NHS England director of NHS commissioning to CCGs on 19th February 2016 entitled ‘Outcome of 2016/17 GMS Contract Negotiations’. “GP practices will be contractually required to record data on patient access to GP services and allow it to be extracted or manually reported. The data required and the form in which it is to be collected will be discussed between GPC and NHS England. It will be used to inform NHS England of the availability of evening and weekend opening for routine appointments and is to be collected until 2020/21. The data will be collected every six months.” This is to support the policy outlined in objective 6 of the government’s mandate to NHS England. Specifically the mandate details a goal for 2020 that: “100% of population has access to weekend/evening routine GP appointments.” No data currently exists to capture access to pre-bookable appointments to GP services on weekday evenings and weekends through GP practices, hubs and federations. Therefore a short survey of predominantly ‘Yes’/’No’ answers has been produced. An example of a question is: “Do patients have the option of accessing pre-bookable Saturday appointments at their practice” The plan is to collect this information from GP practices twice a year. The preferred collection route is the primary Care Web tool
which GP practices already have experience of using. To measure performance, a new indicator will be published on MyNHS as part of the CCG improvement and assessment framework. This will show the proportion of practices in a CCG who offer extended access. 7. State Not submitted 8. ROCR Reference No None 9. Start Date 02/10/2016 10. End Date 31/03/2021 11. FT Collection Type NOT REQUIRED 12. Collection Type MANDATORY 13. Owning Organisation NHS England 14. Owning Department Analytical Services - Commissioning strategy 15. Name and Contact Details Name: Sandra Rochfort Email: sandra.rochfort@nhs.net Tel No: 0113 824 7590 Location: Quarry House Leeds 16. Senior Supporting Official Name John Taylor
10. End Date 01/01/2020 11. FT Collection Type MANDATORY 12. Collection Type MANDATORY 13. Owning Organisation NHS England 14. Owning Department Blood Safety & Supply 15. Owner Name and Contact Details Name: Paul Kane Email: paul.kane@mdsas.com Tel No: 0161 277 7922 Location: MDSAS, Cityview House, Ardwick, Manchester, M12 4JD 16. Senior Supporting Official Name Malcolm Qualie 17. Senior Supporting Official Contact Details Title: Pharmacy Lead Tel No: 0116 2950862 Email: malcolm.qualie@nhs.net Location: Specialised Services, NHS England 18. Data Provider - Burden Days 125.44
18. Data Provider - Burden £ £ 28555.16 18. Frequency Ad-Hoc 18. Source Organisations (Number of orgs) Acute Non Foundation Trust (79) , Acute Foundation Trust (89) 19. Set Up Costs £ 0 20. Other Costs £ 107000.0 21. Costs £ 135555.16 22. Please explain the reason for any increase or decrease in burden and provide details of the any other costs figure provided in Q20 The above is an estimate, as some trusts will be higher and some lower, dependent on the number patients treated. There has been a slight increase in the burden since the last review. This is due to long term chronic patients. Since the last review more clerical staff have become involved in managing the database. A new feature allows NHS Trusts to generate data files from Pharmacy IT System and upload these files into the system. 23. Benefits to Patients and the NHS The collection ensures that Trusts are following the IG Demand Management Plan correctly to ensure patients most in need receive product. The system is also used to track Blood Products via Batch Number for patient safety. The system is used to manage product in times of product shortage. The system is used by Trusts to help generate the information required for the IG Quality Dashboard.
24. Financial benefits to running this collection The collection enables commissioning teams to monitor trust product usage. The system also guides trusts in the correct usage of immunoglobulin. The collection also ensures that Immunoglobulin is only used for diagnoses listed in the IG demand management guidance. The collection also provides comparison usage and procurement data to CSU, which is used when for developing provider service level agreements, and tender documents. 25. Publication methods Annual Report Information Service Summary Reports Monthly Commissioner Reports. Bespoke publications - abstract posters etc. 26. Publication Links https://nww.mdsas.nhs.uk/igrinfo http://www.igd.nhs.uk/ 27. Requesting Organisation NHS England 28. Collection Method Web based collection 29. NHS Mandate Commitment The system supports the National immunoglobulin Demand Management Plan 30. Changes since last assessment 31. Data in operational systems No 32. Plans for collecting this data from operational systems
13. Owning Organisation NHS England 14. Owning Department 15. Name and Contact Details Name: Howard Beswick Email: howard.beswick@nhs.net Tel No: 07833-482388 Location: Skipton House, London 16. Senior Supporting Official Name Juliet Bauer, NHS England 17. Senior Supporting Official Contact Details Title: SRO NHS Wi-Fi Project Tel No: Unknown Email: juliet.bauer@nhs.net Location: Skipton House, London 18. Data Provider - Burden Days 42.4 18. Data Provider - Burden £ £ 27126.25 18. Frequency One-Off 18. Source Organisations (Number of orgs) Acute Non Foundation Trust (53) , Acute Foundation Trust (101) , Mental Health Foundation Trust (48) , Mental Health Non Foundation Trust (10) , Community Health Provider (CHP) (15)
19. Set Up Costs £ 0.0 20. Other Costs £ 0.0 21. Total Costs £ 27126.25 22. Please explain the reason for any increase or decrease in burden and provide details of the any other costs figure provided in Q20 Not Applicable. NHSE are [not] publishing any information on the Trust questionnaire, they were heavily involved in the primary care one, so little or no burden on NHSE. Citizen Space Questionnaire Design and publishing done by NHS Digital. 23. Benefits to Patients and the NHS Supports the WiFi enablement in Trusts across England by providing information to support implementation planning, support for the business case and potential benefits. 24. Financial benefits to running this collection Optimise allocation and best use of available funds 25. Publication methods Online questionnaire published via NHS Digital Citizen Space 26. Publication Links Questionnaire not designed yet no link available 27. Requesting Organisation NHS Digital
Document filename: General Practice Appointments Utilisation – Requirements Project / Programme Appointments Utilisation Project Appointments Utilisation Document Reference RAVE-APPTUTLN-MI-REQS_1.0 Project Manager James Insley Status Owner Martin Warden Version Author Tom Hall Version issue date
particularly for the ‘capacity snapshot’, and that the approach to development and delivery will be collaborative between suppliers, NHS Digital and NHS England. Appendix A – Management Information Reports Specification Appendix B – UKSA QAMI guidance Appendix C – HCP type mappings Appendix D – Ethnicity code mappings
Developer Supplied Information: Request Requesting Organisation: Request Type: Select as required and indicate if new or change to an existing item. Information Standard Title: Physical healthcare for people with serious mental illness (SMI): Primary care data collection Collection on going X Collection One Off Lead Developer Details: Name: Marc Thomas Title: Head of Analysis, NHS England Phone: 07710 152926 marc.thomas1@nhs.net Extraction Survey/ Questionnaire Audit Other – please provide advice Data Type*: Depending on the data type, additional IG consultation will be required (please answer all boxes that apply) Identifiable Yes Nationally £48,000 has been budgeted in Mental health programme funds to run the collection. Transformation Funding is in CCG
E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.15/Rev.9/Amend.2−E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.1/Add.15/Rev.9/Amend.2 10 August 2018 Agreement Concerning the Adoption of Harmonized Technical United Nations Regulations for Wheeled Vehicles, Equipment and which can be Fitted and/or be Used on Wheeled Vehicles and the Conditions for Reciprocal Recognition of Approvals Granted on the Basis of these United Nations Regulations* (Revision 3, including the amendments which entered into force on 14 September 2017) _________ Addendum 15 – UN Regulation No. 16 Revision 9 - Amendment 2 Supplement 2 to the 07 series of amendments – Date of entry into force: 19 July 2018 Uniform provisions concerning the approval of: I. Safety-belts, restraint systems, child restraint systems and ISOFIX child restraint systems for occupants of power-driven vehicles II. Vehicles equipped with safety-belts, safety-belt reminder, restraint systems, child restraint systems, ISOFIX child restraint systems and i-Size child restraint systems This document is purely as documentation tool. The authentic and legal binding text is: ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2017/120. _________ UNITED NATIONS Paragraph 2.30., amend to read: "2.30. "ISOFIX child restraint system" means a child restraint system, fulfilling the requirements of UN Regulation No. 44 or UN Regulation No. 129, which has to be attached to an ISOFIX anchorages system, fulfilling the requirements of UN Regulation No. 14 or UN Regulation No. 145." Paragraph 2.32., to read:
For the following settings identify different methods which could be used to ensure the individuals there are protected. These could be safety procedures or security measures. Setting Methods for reducing the spread of infection Methods for reducing risk / danger Procedures to prevent accidents Procedures to promote good practice Nursery Hospital GP surgery
Solaria Nishitetsu Hotel Tel.: +81 (92) 752 5555 Superior (double) 16.475 149.00 7 min walking 550 m Superior (twin) 19.500 176.00 WBF Fukuoka Nakasu Tel.: +81 (92) 291 4123 Double 17.526 158.00 8 min walking 650 m Twin 17.944 162.00 Superior (twin) 19.171 173.00 Room rates may vary. ______________
W-31 Workmanship for items supplied on this purchase order shall comply with the requirements of the Institute for Interconnecting and Packaging Electronic Circuits (IPC) IPC A-610, entitled “Acceptability of Electronic Assemblies, and shall meet Class 3 requirements unless otherwise specified on the assembly drawing.” W-32 Workmanship for items supplied on this purchase order shall comply with the requirements of the Institute for Interconnecting and Packaging Electronic Circuits (IPC)IPC/WHMA-A-620, entitled “Requirements and Acceptance for Cable and Wire Harness Assemblies, and shall meet Class 2 requirements unless otherwise specified on the assembly drawing.” W-33 Workmanship for items supplied on this purchase order shall comply with the requirements of the Institute for Interconnecting and Packaging Electronic Circuits (IPC) IPC/WHMA-A-620, entitled “Requirements and Acceptance for Cable and Wire Harness Assemblies, and shall meet Class 3 requirements unless otherwise specified on the assembly drawing.” APPROVAL SIGNATURES Electronic approvals by Dave McAfee, Product Assurance and Marianne Forsyth, Process Group are maintained within the EMS Documentation Release tool. DOCUMENT HISTORY RECORD Rev Date By Description Affected Pages Training Required Y/N AB 06/05/14 L. Wise Updated C-1 from 5 to 7 years. Added I-36. 2, 7-8 N
K D. Samuels Replaced “and ISO 9001:2000” with “or ISO 9001:2000” in quality clause Q-4 and provided a more complete title to AS9100B. 8 N J 07/26/07 D. Samuels Revised Q-clause N-3 to comply with AS9100B, para. 7.4.2. 7, 8 N H 05/24/07 PG Added AS9100B Section 1.6 Quality System Requirements. 8 N G 04/16/07 L. Kunster Added quality clause I-1E to flow down AS9102 Aerospace First Article Inspection as required by contract. Clarified C-2 addressing 4-yr retention requirement. Removed CSP reference in I-35. 2, 5, 7 N F 04/05/07 L. Kunster Modified C-1 regarding test/cert record retention from 3 yrs to 4 yrs. Added verbiage to C-1 and I-29 for compliance to AS9100B, para. 4.2.4. Added Q-9 to support JSF flowdown requirements. 2, 6, 8 N E 02/22/07 D. Samuels Added verbiage to the following I-29: “supplier chain”; N-1: “like new”; N-5: NEW-Repair to IPC 7711A and IPC 7721A; Q-4: reworded to include “certified to ISO 9001:2000. Deleted Q-3 (obsolete). 7 - 9 N D 12/07/06 D. Samuels Deleted Q-3 (obsolete); changed Q-4 to reflect ISO 9001:2000; deleted W-9 (obsolete); changed W-27 to Class 2 and added verbiage “and shall meet Class 2 requirements unless otherwise specified on the assembly drawing.” Revised the definition of rework and deleted Q-24 (obsolete). Added paragraph about size in C-12. 2, 3, 7, 8, and 10 N C 08/09/05 S. Shelton Added paragraph about size in C-12. 4 N B 05/11/05 L. Kunster Adds ‘Supersedes QADI 2019’ in the Document History Record. 14 N
A 03/21/05 D. Samuels Add C-12 “Lead Free”. 3, 4 N / 06/22/04 T. Kidder Supersedes Purchase Quality Control Clauses CF 4-5/9 Rev S. No content changes, format changes only. All N
W-33 Workmanship for supplied on this purchase order shall comply with the requirements of the Institute for Interconnecting and Packaging Electronic Circuits (IPC) IPC/WHMA-A-620, entitled “Requirements and Acceptance for Cable and Wire Harness Assemblies, and shall meet Class 3 requirements unless otherwise specified on the assembly drawing.” APPROVAL SIGNATURES Electronic approvals by Dave McAfee, Product Assurance and Marianne Forsyth, Process Group are maintained within the EMS Documentation Release tool. DOCUMENT HISTORY RECORD Rev Date By Description Affected Pages Training Required Y/N AD 04/28/16 A. Clugston 1.4, & 5 N AC 09/25/14 L. Wise Updated S-3 to add AS9115. Clarify C-2. 2, 12 N AB 06/05/14 L. Wise Updated C-1 from 5 to 7 Added I-36. 2, 7-8 N AA 05/30/13 L. Wise Revised C-1, C-2, C-4, C-5, C-6, I-4, Q-11. Removed C-13, H-4, I-19, I-26, I-32, I-35, I-36, Q-1, Q-2, Q-8, Q-9, S-2, S-4, S-5, W-3, W-8. Added N-6, W-6. 2, 3, 5-15 N Y 09/27/12 G. Altson Added I-36 for the monitoring of key characteristics. 9 N W 04/05/12 L. Wise Revised C-13. 5 N 1,
V 12/15/11 L. Wise Revised W-1 to replace cancelled MIL-P-55110 with MIL-PRF-31032. Removed reference to Internet-based Supplier Requested documents. 9, 14 N U 06/30/11 L. Wise Revised Q-10 to coincide with W240. 10 N T 01/13/11 L. Wise Added Q-11 Calibration Service Requirements. 12 N R 09/30/10 L. Wise Added Q-10 Counterfeit Parts Prevention. Revised W-11, W-28, and W-33 with updated references. Updated FAI note to include deltas FAI for revisions to part design or significant process changes. 6, 11, 13, 14, 15 N P 12/17/09 Process Group Modified references to AS9100 and ISO 9001 standards to remove citation of a specific revision. 10, 11 N N 10/29/09 G. Altson W-32 and W-33. 14 N M 11/13/08 D. Samuels Added key characteristics to Q-8 and created W-31. 10, 14 N L Process Group IEC 90003 2004 to paragraph Updated N-3 to replace Cubic Internet link with directions to location. Deleted FAR link. 8, 9, 11 N K D. Samuels Replaced “and ISO 9001:2000” with “or ISO 9001:2000” in quality clause Q-4 and provided a more complete title to AS9100B. 8 N J 07/26/07 D. Samuels Revised Q-clause N-3 to comply with AS9100B, para. 7.4.2. 7, 8 N H 05/24/07 PG AS9100B Section 1.6 Quality System Requirements. 8 N G 04/16/07 L. Kunster Added quality clause I-1E to flow down AS9102 Aerospace First Article Inspection as required by contract. Clarified C-2 addressing 4-yr retention requirement. Removed CSP reference in I-35. 2, 5, 7 N
12.2. The Contracting Parties to the 1958 Agreement which apply this regulation may designate laboratories of tyre manufacturers as approved, test laboratories. 12.3. Where a Contracting Party to the 1958 Agreement applies paragraph 12.2. above, it may, if it so desires, be represented at the tests by one or more persons of its choice." Annex 1, amend to read: "Communication …… of a type of tyre for motor vehicles pursuant to Regulation No. 30" Item 1. amend to read: "1. Manufacturer's name and address :. ." Item 2. amend to read: "2. Tyre type designation3. 2.1. Brand name(s)/trademark(s): 2.2. Trade description(s)/ Commercial name(s): " Delete item 3. Delete item 11. Renumber items 4. to 15. as items 3. to 13. 3 A list of name(s)/trademark(s) or Trade description(s)/ Commercial name(s) may be annexed to this communication" Annex 2, amend to read: "… The above approval mark affixed to a tyre shows that the type of tyre concerned has been approved in the Netherlands (E 4) under approval number 022439. …" 3, amend to read: "… These markings define a tyre: …." Annex 6, title, amend to read: "Method of measuring Paragraph 1.2.4, amend to read: "1.2.4. In reinforced tyres: to 2.2 bar;" Annex 7, Paragraph 2.2., amend to read:
Qualifying limits for acceptance on different numbers of test results for each grouping of characteristics are listed in Table 2 as maximum number of non-compliance. The limits are based on an acceptable level of 1 per cent of non-compliance, assuming an acceptance probability of at least 0.95. Table 2* Number of test results of each characteristics Qualifying limits for acceptance 20 21 - 50 51 - 80 81 - 125 126 - 200 201 - 260 261 - 315 316 - 370 371 - 435 436 - 500 501 - 570 571 - 645 646 - 720 721 - 800 801 - 860 861 - 920 921 - 990 991 - 1,060 1,061 - 1,125 1,126 - 1,190 1,191 - 1,249 0 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 * In accordance with ISO 2859-1:1999 "Sampling procedures for inspection by attributes - Part 1: Sampling schemes indexed by acceptance quality limit (AQL) for lot-by-lot inspection" including Technical Corrigendum 1:2001. Qualifying limits for acceptance based on different numbers of test results for each grouping of characteristics are listed in Table 3 given as maximum number of The limits are based on an acceptable level of 6.5 per cent of non-compliance, assuming an acceptance probability of at least 0.95. 3 Number of filament light sources in records Qualifying limit Number of filament light sources in records Qualifying limit Number of filament light sources in records Qualifying limit
E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.38/Rev.2/Amend.1−E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.1/Add.38/Rev.2/Amend.1 5 December 2017 Agreement Concerning the Adoption of Harmonized Technical United Nations Regulations for Wheeled Vehicles, Equipment and Parts which can be Fitted and/or be Used on Wheeled Vehicles and the Conditions for Reciprocal Recognition of Approvals Granted on the Basis of these United Nations Regulations* (Revision 3, including the amendments entered into force on 14 September 2017) _________ Addendum 38 – UN Regulation No. 39 Revision 2 - Amendment 1 Supplement 1 to the 01 series of amendments – Date of entry into force: 10 October 2017 Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to the speedometer and odometer equipment including its installation This document is meant purely as documentation tool. The authentic and legal binding text is: ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2017/11 (1622634). _________ UNITED NATIONS Paragraph 2.5., footnote 2, amend the reference to paragraph 5.3. to read "5.4". Paragraphs 5. to 5.2.4., amend to read: "5. Specifications 5.1. An onboard speedometer and odometer complying with the requirements of this Regulation shall be fitted to the vehicle to be approved.
Radiocommunication Bureau (BR) Circular Letter 6/LCCE/97 11 December 2017 To Administrations of Member States of the ITU, Radiocommunication Sector Members, ITUR Associates participating in the work of Radiocommunication Study Group 6 and ITU Academia Subject: Meetings of Working Parties 6A, 6B and 6C – WP 6A: Terrestrial broadcasting delivery – WP 6B: Broadcast service assembly and access – WP 6C: Programme production and quality assessment 1 Introduction By means of this Circular Letter, I wish to announce that the meetings of ITUR Working Parties 6A, 6B and 6C will take place in the ITU Headquarters in Geneva from 16 - 26 April 2018 (see the table below), prior to the meeting of Radiocommunication Study Group 6: Groups Meeting dates Deadline for contributions 1600 hours UTC Opening session Working Party 6A 17-25 April 2018 Tuesday, 10 April 2018 Tuesday, 17 April 2018 at 0930 hours Working Party 6B 23-26 April 2018 Monday, 16 April 2018 Monday, 23 April 2018 at 0930 hours Working Party 6C 16-20 April 2018 Monday, 9 April 2018 Monday, 16 April 2018 at 0930 hours 2 Programme of the meetings Draft agendas for the meetings are contained in the Annex. The status of texts assigned to the Working Parties can be found on: The Working Parties will conduct work in English.
emission sources. Aggregate emissions shall mean the total emissions from a particular insignificant activity or group of similar insignificant activities (e.g., A.1, A.2, etc.) within a permit per year. Emission Point ID No. Description Physical/Operating Data Citation 18. Regulatory Applicability for Commonly Applicable Regulations – Answer all below [LAC 33:III.517.D.10] Does this facility contain asbestos or asbestos containing materials? Yes No If “yes,” the facility or any portion thereof may be subject to 40 CFR 61, Subpart M, LAC 33:III.Chapter 27, and/or LAC 33:III.5151, and this application must address compliance as stated in Section 19 of this application.
Bristle length (440 ± 20) mm visible Penetration (100 ± 20) mm (see Figure 7) The state of the brushes shall be regularly controlled. At least one monitoring of the total amount of operating hours in use for the brush and an automatic replacement of the brush shall be conducted as soon as 30 operating hours are reached (30 hours equates around 300 test runs since one test takes around 6 minutes). The amount of operating hours shall be reported with the haze increase result of the sample. 4.8.1.2. Spray nozzle: Number 2 (spray alternatively and against the direction of travel of the test panel holder) Material stainless Spread of jet 65° Water flow rate (2.2 ± 0.1) l/min. at (300 ± 50) kPa The two nozzles shall spray alternately and against the direction of travel of the test panel holder. They shall produce the specified spray pattern (see instrument calibration in Figure 8). 4.8.1.3. Test panel holder Feed speed (5 ± 0.2) m/min. Pattern of movement if the brush is rotating clockwise, the right nozzle is spraying and the test panel holder travels from the left side to the right side (and vice versa) Figure 7 Movement pattern of washing brush and nozzle Key 1 2 Spray nozzle 3 Test panel holder 4 jet (horizontal middle of the jet strikes brush 50 mm above table directly in the brush) a Penetration depth Dimensions in mm 4.8.2. Spray suspension Prepare a suspension consisting of (1.5 ± 0.05 g) of silica powder (silica micro-powder having a mean particle size of 24 μm) per litre of tap water in a container, stirring vigorously. The water temperature shall be between 15 °C and 30 °C. The suspension shall be stirred continuously during the test procedure in such a way that the silica powder does not settle on the bottom of the container. 4.8.3. Test samples The size of the samples shall be 50 mm x 100 mm.
Annex 1 - Appendix 7 Multiple glazed units (Principal and secondary characteristics as defined in Annex 12 or Annex 16 to Regulation No. 43) Approval No. ........................................ Extension No. ........................................... Principal characteristics: Composition of multiple glazed units (symmetrical/asymmetrical): Nominal thickness of the gap: Method of assembly: Type of each glazing component as defined in Annexes 5, 7, 9, 11 or 14: Documents attached: One form for all of a symmetrical multiple glazed unit in accordance with the annex under which the panes have been tested or approved. One form for each different pane of an asymmetrical multiple glazed unit in accordance with the annexes under which these panes have been tested or approved. Remarks:
When target (b) (see Figure 22(b)) is used, the secondary image of the spot shifts beyond the point of tangency with the inside edge of the circle, i.e. whether the limit value of n is exceeded. Figure 22 Dimensions of targets Figure 23 Arrangement of apparatus Figure 24 Apparatus for collimation-telescope test
N3 Optional (no requirements for the field of view) Compulsory 1 on the driver's side and 1 on the passenger's side Not permitted Compulsory 1 on the driver's side and 1 on the passenger's side In addition according to paragraphs 15.2.4.5.6. to 15.2.4.5.11. for vehicles with a mounting height of the Class V mirror of not less than 2.4 m (see paragraph 15.2.4.5.12.): the required field of vision (paragraphs 15.2.4.5.6. to 15.2.4.5.9.) may be viewed using a combination of direct view and indirect vision devices (of Classes IV, V, VI). Compulsory (see paragraph 15.2.2.7. and 15.2.4.5.5) 1 on the passenger's side Optional 1 on driver's side (both shall be fitted at least 2 m above the ground) In addition according to paragraphs 15.2.4.5.6. to 15.2.4.5.11. for vehicles with a mounting height of the Class V mirror of not less than 2.4 m (see paragraph 15.2.4.5.12.): the required field of vision (paragraphs 15.2.4.5.6. to 15.2.4.5.9.) may be viewed using a combination of direct view and indirect vision devices (of Classes IV, V, VI). Compulsory (see paragraph 15.2.1.1.2 1. front mirror (shall be fitted at least 2 m above the ground) In addition according to paragraphs 15.2.4.5.6. to 15.2.4.5.11. for vehicles with a mounting height of the Class V mirror of not less than 2.4 m (see paragraph 15.2.4.5.12.): the required field of vision (paragraphs 15.2.4.5.6. to 15.2.4.5.9.) may be viewed using a combination of direct view and indirect vision devices (of Classes IV, V, VI).