zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
# Preventive Maintenance Topics Tech Transfer Topic (now) Short Term “Analysis Idea” (less than a year – crunch data from state projects or MnROAD) Long Term MnROAD Research Sections (longer) General Comments 1 High Speed Chip Seals (What each state is doing and what is needed to be successful in designing/constructing high speed chip seals) WI – Interested in double and triple chip seals #1 - MO #5 - IL 2 Effects of Aging on HMA Pavements (Group found interest in pulling together a summary of the findings from MnROAD and what other states have learned rel Surface Treatments to ½ a test cell for the 2017 asphalt test sections Ben Worel - (Idea to keep in mind but what treatment(s) – added 5/7/16 to the discussion rated to the timing of treatments) #2 – MO #2 – WI #1 - MN #2 – MTE 1-UNH #2 - RS #4 - MO #1 – MTE #1 – Mcleod #1 – MN 1 - UNH (one) MTE – Combine 2,3,24 – We have found a good correlation between cracking and Tc at MnROAD. Optain Tc values along with PCI data of test sections and use that to guide treatment alternatives. Monitor performance over time in a similar fashion as to what is written in my problem statement. Topic 5 also might fit here due to rejuvenators 3 Combined with 2 4 Surface treatments for HMA pavement (Project selection, materials, design, construction, performance, and LCC benefit). #3 – MO #1 - WI #1 – MTE #5 – Mcleod 1 - UNH (four) MAPA MTE – Combine 4,10,11 best practice guide 5 Effects of pavement performance rejuvenators on asphalt pavement life (Application timing, materials, benefit). MAPA
10 Pavement preservation approaches for lightly surfaced roadways (Options for local agencies to preserve roads that meet the unique requirements of low volume roadways. Address roadways surfaced with aggregates, thin PCC, stabilized RAP, including both engineered emulsion and foamed asphalt). #1 - RS #1 - IL #4 – MTE #2 – Mcleod (one tie) MTE – Combine 4,10,11 best practice 11 Pavement preservation for shoulders of all types (Evaluate effectiveness of alternative treatments). #5 – MO #4 - MTE #3 – IL #2 - RS #4 - Mcleod MTE – Combine 4,10,11 best practice 12 Cost-benefit “Life Cycle” of pavement smoothness (How smooth is "smooth enough" for older pavements at different vehicle travel speeds. Local low volume vs. high speed high volume Good tie to other teams? #4 – IGGA #2 - MN #4 – IL MAPA #2 – CPAM #1 – RS #2 – Mcleod (three) MTE – Combine 9 and 12 13 Performance of smaller (Type A) aggregate with Ultra Thin Bonded Wearing Course (UTBWC) in summer and winter (snow & ice control) – tie to 18 #2 – MO #1 - WI #3 – IL 1 - UNH #4 - MTE #1 – WI MAPA 1 - UNH in addition WisDOT was interested in the 4.75 mm 5/8 thick overlays which were not included in this list not just the UTBWC
Public Transportation Management System Owned Equipment Inventory Agency/organization: Date: Equipment Code and Description Condition (points) Age (years) Remaining Useful Life (years) Replacement Cost ($) Comments (If more than two lines, please attach a separate comment page) 1. 05 (EXAMPLE) Bus Washer 100 4 21 $150,000 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.
Preventive Physical Exam Completion Reporting Form Employee name: __________________________________ Employee ID number: ___________________________ Date of physical examination: _________________________ Name of physician: _______________________ I certify that _________________________ received a routine physical examination from me on _________________________. _________________________ ________________ Provider’s Signature Date Mail or email this form to Jennifer Geist at MS. 26 or by May 31, 2018 in order to receive your 100 wellness points in our Healthy Steps incentive program.
community Drawing evidence from across the curriculum Developing in young people a sense of multiple identities. Help young people become aware of, and comfortable with, multiple personal identity Disaffection with wider societal issues Disruptive home life Other factors Support from senior leaders Pupil support processes Sense of dignity and importance and loyalty Exciting (non-teaching) activities Sense of purpose in life
FSC Comment Form for FSC-STD-20-011 Version 1-2 Draft 2-0 EN Chain of Custody Evaluations Document type Code Version No. Draft No. Circulated Policy Manager Consultation Deadline for comment Compilation date Standard FSC-STD-20-011 1-2 2-0 Lucia Massaroth Public 22 October 2013 Comments provided by: Name: Organization: Phone: Email: Date of comments submission: Comments shall be submitted to: Dorothee Jung: Reference Part No. / Clause. No. / Note/Annex/Definition (e.g. “Introduction”; clause 3.1; p. 8, line 3) Type of comment G = general; T = technical; E = editorial Comment Justification / rationale for change Proposed change Suggested new wording (additions, modifications, deletions) PSU observation on each submitted comment Contributor M-econ, M-env; M-soc, CB, CH, NI / North-South
AUSTRALIAN BLUEGUM PLANTATIONS Stakeholder Consultation Form Supply of soft wood for Australian Bluegum Plantation’s products may come from a variety of plantation sources. Some are local FSC certified and some are local controlled material source. All wood sourced is plantation grown from the Australian states of Victoria and South Australia including all sub districts within these state boundaries. ABP is currently certified to the FSC Controlled Wood (CW) Standard (v2-1), and FSC Chain of Custody Standard FSC-STD-40-004. A new version of the CW standard has been released, FSC-STD-40-005 V3-1 FSC Requirements for Sourcing FSC Controlled Wood, which ABP will be assessed to. Please refer to the links and for more information on these standards. As a requirement of FSC-STD-40-005 V3-1, ABP seeks comment from stakeholders who may have an interest in ABP’s Due Diligence System (DDS) for assessing controlled wood. This system is a set of measures and procedures ABP will utilise to assess the sourcing of material (wood) and minimise the risk of sourcing material from unacceptable sources. All comments and feedback must be received by Wednesday 9th August and can be sent to Leanne Tomlinson at . Please advise in your response if you do not consent to the publication of your comments. Section 1 – Consultation Details Date Feedback from Stakeholder Email Telephone Fax Company Rep: Section 2 – Stakeholder Details Name Address Telephone Email Do you consent to the publication of any comments you provide? Yes No
1993 Science Discovery Yaki Aharovov, Distinguished Professor of Physics at the University of South Carolina. Science Awareness William Junkin, Professor of Physics at Erskine College. 1994 Science Discovery Donald D. Clayton, Ph.D., Professor of Physics and Astronomy at Clemson University. Science Awareness R. Bruce Dunlap, Ph.D., Professor of Chemistry and Biochemistry at University of South Carolina. 1995 Science Discovery Frank T. Avignone, Ph.D. Professor of Physics at USC. Science Awareness Daniel F. Antion, Ph.D. Associate Director of the Office of Technology Transfer at USC. 1996 Excellence in Science Maria G. Buse, Ph.D., Medical University of South Carolina. Excellence in Science Elizabeth M. Martin, College of Charleston. 1997 Excellence in Science John H. Dawson, Ph.D., University of South Carolina. Excellence in Science Sarah F. Stallings, PhD., Winthrop University. 1998 Excellence in Science Joseph R. Manson, Ph. D., Clemson University. Excellence in Science George E. Tempel, PhD., Medical University of South Carolina. 1999 Excellence in Science Roy E. Wuthier, Ph. D. University of South Carolina. Excellence in Science Michael H. Farmer, PhD., Greenville Technical College. 2000 Scientific Research The team of Thomas Borg, Ph.D. and Louis Terracio, Ph.D., USC School of Medicine.
Young Scientist Karen Burg, Ph.D., Clemson University. 2007 Scientific Research Dr. Daniel Reger, University of South Carolina. Science Awareness Dr. Stacey F. Jones Benedict College. Young Scientist Dr. Varavut Limpasuvan, Coastal Carolina University. 2008 Scientific Research Dr. Terry Tritt, Clemson University. Science Awareness Dr. Don M. Jordan, University of South Carolina. Young Scientist Dr. Donna Chen, University of South Carolina. 2009 Scientific Research Dr. Dennis Smith, Clemson University. Science Awareness Dr. Martine LaBerge, Clemson University. Sondra Wieland, Heathwood Hall Episcopal High School Young Scientist Dr. Qian Wang, University of South Carolina. 2010 Scientific Research Dr. George Wicks, Savannah River National Laboratory. Science Awareness Dr. Barbara Speziale, Clemson University. Young Scientist Dr. Paul Thompson, University of South Carolina. 2011 Scientific Research Dr. James Sodetz, University of South Carolina. Science Awareness Dr. James Privett, University of South Carolina Sumter.
PDCS2 - 8 375KB PCDS2 PDCS1 - 1 25.21KB PDCS1 PDCS1 - 2 2.29MB PDCS1 PDCS1 - 3 4.53MB PDCS1 PDCS1 - 4 23.32KB PDCS1 PDCS1 - 5 51.89KB PDCS1 PDCS1 - 6 8.30MB PDCS1 PDCS1 - 7 167.86KB PDCS1 P07 48.04MB CSUCP CSUCP - 1 757.99KB CSUCP CSUCP - 2 3.28MB CSUCP CSUCP - 3 2.34MB CSUCP CSUCP - 4 1.39MB CSUCP CSUCP - 5 2.49MB CSUCP CSUCP - 6 10.39MB CSUCP CSUCP - 7 44.89MB CSUCP CSUCP - 8 6.24MB CSUCP CSUCP - 9 937KB CSUCP CSUCP - 10 3.75MB CSUCP CSUCP - 11 21.63MB CSUCP CSUCP - 12 2.41MB CSUCP CSUCP - 13 3.67MB CSUCP CSUCP - 14 2.84MB CSUCP CSUCP - 15 2.54MB CSUCP
Program Implementation Procedures The steps below will be followed when implementing the Prework Screening Program. Step One. Functional job descriptions will be provided to <screening provider name> for each job included in the Scope. This information will be used to create an appropriate prework screening for each job included in the program. Step Two. <Screening provider name> will review the functional job description and verify the essential functions by observing a current employee performing the job tasks. Step Three. Based on the information gathered from the functional job description and observations, <screening provider name> will identify the necessary prework screening criteria and orientation materials. The documents will be sent to the Program Administrator for review prior to being used. Step Four. The Program Administrator will ensure that the prework screening criteria are as accurate as possible. This will be accomplished by requiring <screening provider name> to first “test the test” by administering the prework screen on current employees. The results from these screenings will be presented to the Program Administrator with all personally identifiable information (PII) removed. Step Five. The Program Administrator will analyze the results and correct any procedural, communication or technical problems before job applicants are screened. Step Six. Start screening job candidates for jobs included in the program. Prework Screening Process All job candidates offered a position in the jobs listed in the Scope will receive both a verbal and written conditional job offer of employment. This means the candidate is required to pass a prework screening prior to beginning work for <Company Name>. Check Your Understanding. You will need to develop a conditional offer of employment letter to send to job candidates. Consult your legal counsel when creating this letter to make sure it is pursuant to applicable employment-related laws and regulations. All candidates receiving conditional job offers will be sent to the <screening provider, address, and phone> to undergo screening. Candidates must undergo screening within <insert time period> or the conditional offer of employment will be rescinded. A copy of the conditional offer of employment letter will be sent to the screening provider. Results. <Screening provider name> will determine if the employee has passed or failed the screening. The results will be sent to the Program Administrator who will inform the hiring manager/supervisor of the results of the screening within <insert time period>. If <Company Name> receives a passing score for the job candidate and if he or she passes all routine HR reviews and testing, the hiring manager/supervisor may contact the job candidate and offer a final, non-conditional job offer.
Final day or days the of professional experience placement The teacher education student will meet with the supervising teacher about their Professional Experience Report and discuss areas of strength or improvement they may need to address in future placements. Use the Post- Placement Goal Setting Form to document this meeting. Review the Professional Experience Report with the supervising teacher and ensure it has been signed, dated and stamped by the school. (3.1.1, 6.3.1) The Professional Experience Report is to be completed by the final day of the placement and emailed to the Office for Professional Learning
What didn’t go so well – with reasons (2500 characters text) What do I want to achieve next year? (2500 characters text) If not actually written by child/young person please ensure this is reflected (100 characters text) Year 9 onwards: Young Person’s views The review must focus on preparation for adulthood including independent living, employment and participation in society. Record discussion of future plans and aspirations for the young person, this discussion MUST include relevant professionals from schools/provider, Careers SW (from Year 11) and adult services as appropriate; Education & Employment Further education and or employment- this includes exploring different employment options, such as support for becoming self- employed and help from supported employment agencies (2500 characters text) Independent Living Having choice, control and freedom over their lives and the support they have, their accommodation and living arrangements, including supported living (2500 characters text) Participation in Society Having friends and supportive relationships, and participating in, and contributing to, the local community. (2500 characters text) Healthy Living Being as healthy as possible in adult life (2500 characters text) Should the young person be considered for access to Adult Services: Yes/No Following conversation, please ensure relevant referrals are made and outcomes proposed
Progress and Attainment at School 1. Early Years Foundation Stage NCY 0 End of Foundation Stage Judgement Has the child achieved a Good Level of Development? Yes No Not Applicable 2. National Curriculum Key Stages 1 – 3 NCY 1 to NCY 9 Current Age Related Expectation 2.1 English Reading - Decoding 1E 1D 1S 1G 2E 2D 2S 2G 3E 3D 3S 3G 4E 4D 4S 4G 5E 5D 5S 5G 6E 6D 6S 6G 7S 7D 7S 7G 8E 8D 8S 8G 9E 9D 9S 9G 10E 10D 10S 10G 11E 11D 11S 11G Not Applicable 2. 2 English Reading – Comprehension As above 2.3 English Writing As above 2.4 Mathematics As above
Math number: Name: Class period: Equations and Inequalities Tic-Tac-Toe Circle the boxes you plan to complete. They should form a tic-tac-toe horizontally, vertically, or diagonally. All items are due by: Write a Letter Write a letter to teach the process of solving inequalities to your classmates who have been absent. Be sure to cover one-step and two-step inequalities and how to graph them on a number line. Use examples as needed. Easy as 1, 2, 3! Create examples of five different equations that students may have trouble solving. Include equations with variables on both sides. Create a small poster display that shows examples and strategies for solving each. Know Your Goal! You have been given the goal number of 9. Create at least 10 different equations (include two- and multi-step equations) that have your goal number as a solution. Prove that your goal number is the solution by using substitution. Know Your Goal! Choose any multiple of 5 greater than 20. Create a collage for your number that shows at least 10 equations (include two- and multi-step equations) with a solution of your goal number. Free Choice Write a proposal on the back of this page. Seek approval before beginning the free choice! Easy as 1, 2, 3! Create a solving equations brochure that explains how to solve multi-step equations (with variables on both sides). Include various examples to support your explanation. Easy as 1, 2, 3! Create a children’s book that makes solving inequalities fun, easy, and applicable to students’ real lives. Include at least three creative problems in your book. Know Your Goal! Your age is your goal number. Create at least 10 different equations (include two- and multi-step equations) that have your goal number as a solution. Prove that your goal number is the solution by using substitution. Create a Riddle Create a riddle that requires your classmates to solve inequalities to find the answer. Include at least 8 inequalities (one- and
A stand alone final care plan must be prepared, setting out how the local authority intends to meet the child’s needs, including issues pertaining to placement provision, health care, education and importantly contact with birth relatives. The independent reviewing officer role is crucial here, and it is vital they are in agreement with the final care plan, or where they are not that the Court is made aware of any areas of disagreement. The local authority must plan effectively to ensure decisions are made in a timely manner to enable local arrangements for the ratification of any adoption plan for instance to be in place at the necessary time prior to the IRH.
Top of Form Expression of Interest (EOI) Notice Pur/2017-18/RCD Date: 04.05.2017 CSIR-CDRI, Lucknow intends to engage an agency for procurement, installation and commissioning of HVAC (Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) work of Primate House 1st floor and 5 rooms' in the animal house at the old campus of CDRI, Lucknow on turn key basis. A conference is being arranged on 23rd May 2017 at 11:00 AM in the CDRI, conference room of Purchase Section in the new Campus. Prospective Bidders those have the instruments are invited to make presentation followed by discussion on Technology, Features, Design, Utility, Parameters (Technical) clientele etc. as per solution offered by them. For complete detail and for downloading the EOI bidding documents, please refer to our website Stores & Purchase Officer Email – Ref: Press Advertisement No. Pur/2017-18/RCD dated 04th May 2017 Expression of Interest (EOI) For Procurement of “HVAC (Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning)” on turn-key basis Invitation of EOI: Central Drug Research Institute (CDRI), Lucknow, which was established constituent laboratory of Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR), undertakes research in Drug Discovery. In order to augment the CDRI animal house strength, a requirement is being felt in the Institute to procure, installation and commissioning HVAC (Heating, ventilation and work of Primate House 1st floor and 5 rooms in the old CDRI compus Schedule of requirement: The broad feature of the proposed instrument is as follow:
2 Descriptions Of Any Proposed Third Parties (Provide similar information to that required in 1 above). 3. Relationships Between Proposing Vendor And Any Nominated Third Parties. (Provide descriptions of the trading, commercial and legal relationships with any third party nominated in the response.) 4. The Proposing Supplier’s General Understanding Of The Requirements And The Proposed equipment details including the average life-span of the equipment. (Separate sheet may be attached, if need felt) 5. The Main Features Of The Proposed Solution And Any Areas Of Risk 6. Upgrade Strategy (Describe the strategy suggested for future upgrade of the supplied systems and any impact this strategy may have on operation etc.) 7. Implementation Activities And Timing (Provide detailed time schedule for the proposed implementation activities including the delivery & installation) 8. Maintenance And Support (Describe the maintenance and continuing technical support services, escalations etc that will be provided for the proposed systems till the of the equipment. Mention the address and other contact details in ). 9.. Benchmarking/Testing Procedures (Details of the proposed benchmarking/ testing procedures for the systems). 11. Warranties and Guarantees (if any) (please provide standard conditions and extension chances of the warranty)
MM1A1i: Understand that any equation in x can be interpreted as the equation f(x) = g(x), and interpret the solutions of the equation as the x-value(s) of the intersection point(s) of the graphs of y = f(x) and y = g(x). Use the graph to the right to find one of the solutions to the quadratic equation x2 – 7x + 10 = 0. -7 -3 2 10 The graph of f(x) = x2 – 2x + 2 is shown to the left. Use the graph to find the solution(s), if any, to the equation x2 – 2x + 2 = 5. No solution x = 3 x = -1 x = -1 and x = 3 MM1A2a: Simplify algebraic and numeric expressions involving square roots. Order the expressions from least to greatest: 85 , 641/2, 100. 641/2, 100 , 85 100 , 85 , 641/2 100, 641/2, 85 641/2, 85 , 100 Simplify 81a2b4 9ab 9a2b4 9ab2 9ab MM1A2b: Perform operations with square roots. Find the product. Simplify the radical expression . MM1A2c: Add, subtract, multiply, and divide polynomials. Multiply (x – 6)(3x2 + 10x – 1) 3x3 + 10x2 – x 3x3 – 8x2 – 61x + 6 3x3 + 10x2 – 60x + 6 3x3 – 18x2 + 10x2 + 6 Simplify (3x3 + 2x2 + 10) + (3x3 + 2x2 + 10x) 6x3 + 4x2 + 20x 6x3 + 4x2 + 10x + 10 9x3 + 4x2 + 100x 9x3 + 4x2 + 10x +10 MM1A2d: Add, subtract, multiply, and divide rational expressions. Simplify and determine the domain: . Add and simplify: . Simplify the expression
Back up actors Contact details Role Ally Colquhoun 07759501*** Lead female Taz Saunders 07979088*** Lead female Max Sames 07469 171*** Lead male Back up locations: 12A Newtown Gardens, Henley on Thames, RG9 1EH 16 Bradley Road, Nuffield, RG9 5SG Hambledon Woods RISK ASSESSMENT ACTIVITY HAZARD RISK H/M/L PRECAUTIONS IN PLACE REVIEW DATE REVIEWER Skateboarding Could slip if wet M Ensure filming takes place on dry day Yes 9th April ALEX GILBEY Falling off skateboard Could hurt themselves L Make sure the fall is minor, more like a trip than a fall 9th April ALEX GILBEY Jumps into his arms He may not catch her meaning she could fall L Make sure the ground is relatively soft - woods YES 16th April Alex Gilbey
SFR 19-2016: Secondary and primary school applications and offers in England, March and April 2016 Secretary of State for Education Minister of State for Schools PS Advisors Permanent Secretary Iain Bell – Director, Data & Education Standards Analysis and Head of Profession for Statistics Andrew McCully – Director General, Infrastructure & Funding Directorate Lesley Jones – Deputy Director, School Organisation & Admissions Division Ken Seeds – Grade 6, School Admissions Division David Broadhead – SEO, School Admissions Division Salma Ishaque – Grade 7, School Organisation & Admissions Division Patrick Curry – Deputy Director, Central Capital Unit Vicky Dare – Grade 6, Central Capital Unit Vicki Bowes – Grade 6, Pupil Place Planning Team Peter Drummond – Deputy Director, International Education Division Elin Jones – Grade 6, Teacher Quality Division Jayne Roberts – Press Officer, Schools Desk Hannah Fletcher – Head of Media Alex Blackburn – Press Officer, Schools Desk Anna Croall – Press Officer, News Desk Brenden Threlfall – PS to the Prime Minister Helen Alderton – No. 10 Policy unit Max Blain – Press Officer, No 10 Rachel Wolf – Policy advisor, No. 10 Laura Trott – Head of media grid, No. 10 Robin Gordon-Farleigh – Communications strategy, No. 10
PART II Please take this opportunity to tell us about your child in a less formal and more personal fashion. We intend to understand and appreciate your child in a way that may be unique to the home or your experience. We strongly suggest that you list three to five adjectives that describe your child and then provide brief anecdotes that illustrate these qualities. All responses will be kept confidential. Quality Anecdote Person completing this form ________________________________________ date __________________
NATIONAL STRATEGIC APPROACH TO MATERNITY SERVICES PROJECT REFERENCE GROUP Meeting Communiqué April 2018 The third meeting of the Project Reference Group (PRG) was held on April 6. David Ellwood and Helen McCarthy, co-chairs of the Advisory Group (AG), attended and provided feedback from the inaugural meeting of the AG. The PRG noted that there was good representation from the various groups invited to participate in the AG. The PRG discussed the draft consultation paper and agreed to the addition of other documents to provide extra information for people. The PRG noted that online submissions will be sought as well the paper providing background reading for the workshops and focus groups. The Chair updated the PRG on planning for the consultation workshops. The PRG noted the range of groups invited to the workshops and agreed to focus groups to hear the voice of women, including culturally and linguistically diverse women and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women. The next meeting of the PRG will be held in one month
Carlsberg £3.45/£1.85 Fosters £3.55/£1.95 Guest ale £3.55/£1.95 Guinness £3.85/£2.05 Hobgoblin £3.55/£1.95 Pedigree £3.55/£1.95 Stella £3.85/£2.05 Thatcher £3.60/£2.00 Becks (blue) £2.60 Budweiser £3.55 Bulmer’s £4.40 Corona £3.60bi45 Newcastle ale £4.10 Peroni £3.55 Smirnoff ice £3.50 WKD £3.50 125ml £3.00 175ml £3.40 250ml £4.40 Single serve £3.40 Spritzer £3.65 Prosecco £5.35 House white 75cl £13.95 House red 75cl £13.95 Rioja £15.95 Sparkling wine £16.95 Champagne £32.50 Archers 50ml £2.75 Baileys 50ml £2.95 Bacardi 25ml £2.75 Bells 25ml £2.75 Bombay sapphire 25ml £2.85 Brandy 25ml £2.85 Captain Morgan’s 25ml £2.85 Disaraono 25ml £3.00 Famous grouse 25ml £2.80 Gordons 25ml £2.75 House double 50ml £3.60 Jack Daniels 25ml £2.95 Jägermeister 25ml £3.00 Jamesons 25ml £2.95 Malibu 25ml £2.75 Martini 50ml £2.85 Pimms 25ml £2.80 Port 50ml £2.85 Sambucca 25ml £3.00 Sherry 50ml £2.85 Shots 25ml £2.00 Smirnoff 25ml £2.80 Southern comfort 25ml £2.80 Tequila 25ml £3.00 Tia Maria 25ml £2.85 Single malts 25ml £3.35 Regular soda & dash £1.35 Large soda & dash £1.75 Regular Pepsi £2.00 Large Pepsi £2.50 J20/55 £2.45 Fruitshoot £1.80 Juice/mixer £2.10 Ginger beer £2.55 Bottled water £2.00 Dash 35p Double dash 55p Fill up 80p
pox, MMR, Pneumococcal, Rotavirus, meningitis, yellow fever, Varicella, diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough, pentavalent vaccine) Additional Immunizations: (6yrs and above) (Meningitis, Yellow Fever, Hepatitis B) Each Cover Phototherapy and Neonatal care Each Cover Incubator & Special baby care unit (14 days) Each Cover Well Baby Clinic Each Cover Nutritional Scheme (Meetings & Tips) Each Cover Circumcision & Ear-piercing Each Cover Special baby care unit Each Cover SURGICAL SERVICES – Including day case procedure Minor Procedures Each Cover Intermediate Each Cover Major Procedures Each Cover RADIOLOGICAL SERVICES X-Rays & Ultrasound scans Each Cover CT Scan/MRI Each Cover Adult Immunization (Meningitis, Yellow Fever, Hepatitis B) Each Cover Laboratory and Diagnostic Tests Each Cover EYE CARE Primary Eye Care- Consultation, Examination, Simple or primary infection or conditions and Medications Each Cover Biennial Optical Lenses (Lenses can be changed when refractive error changes Each Cover Optical Care (Treatment of Chronic & Acute Eye Diseases) Each Cover Eye Surgeries Each Cover DENTAL CARE Primary Dental Care - Examination, Basic dental treatment, Simple amalgam or composite filling, Scaling and polishing, Non-surgical extractions and Pain therapy/ relief, preventive care. Each Cover Secondary Dental Care - Surgical tooth extraction, Root canal treatment and Orthodontics, Dental Prosthetics Each Cover ENT CARE (Ear, Nose & Throat) Treatment of ENT diseases and removal of foreign bodies Each Cover ENT Surgeries Each Cover CANCER CARE Cancer Screening Each Cover Mammogram Each Cover PSA test Each Cover Surgical Treatment Each Cover Oncology Tests Each Cover
PRICE LIST current as at 1stJanuary 2016 Particle, Plaster Sediment Trap 304 Stainless Steel 3 Disposable – Collection/filtration bags Smart Sinks PPST BM $6,872.80 +GST More than one ask for pricing Particle, Plaster Sediment Trap 304 Stainless Steel 3 Disposable – Collection/filtration Bags Trolley version Smart Sinks PPST M $8,624.00 More than one ask for pricing Particle, Plaster Sediment Trap 304 Stainless Steel 3 Disposable – Collection/filtration Bags Tradie Version Smart Sinks PPST Tradies Version $6,798.00 More than one ask for pricing Spun Polypropylene With valve sleeve 2 x draw cord with Cord locks Smart Sinks Top Blue bags Pk10 TRB15 $49.50 +GST Per Pk of 10 Spun Polypropylene Rectangular Elasticised top Smart Sinks Large Bags Pk10 LFB10 $45.50 +GST Per Pk of 10 Spun Polypropylene Square Elasticised top White Smart Sinks Small Bags Pk 10 SRFB10 $34.00 +GST Per Pk of 10 Monthly Bundle 20 x Top Blue Bag 2 x Square Bag 2 x Rectangle Bag Smart Sinks Monthly Bundle Average use SSMB16 $118.00+GST Per Bundle 304 Stainless Steel Funnel is cut into Bench with sharps Container placed under Smart Sinks Sharps Funnel SR07 $181.78+GST
So if interest rates change (in either direction) by 1 bp, the price of a $1 million (face value) bond will change (in the opposite direction) by approximately $1,186 Remember: p is the price change of a bond with a par value of 100 when there is a 1% change in the yield. PVBP is the price change of a bond with a par value of 100 when there is a .01% (one basis point) change in the yield. PVBP ($/million) is the price change of a bond with a par value of $1,000,000 when there is a .01% (one basis point) change in the yield. Calculating PVBP for a Portfolio PVBPp = ni PVBPi/100 Where ni = face value of security i Find the PVBP for each security in the portfolio and divide each one by 100. Multiply the PVBP/100 for each security by its face value and sum the total Note that when the market value of a portfolio is higher, the PVBP is greater. This makes sense since it is a measure of the dollar change in value. You will get bigger dollar changes for bigger portfolios.
ALL CERAMIC CROWN ZIRCONIA OR EMAX £400 £150 VENEERS £300 £100 POST & CORE £100 JUST LAB BILL IF MADE MY LAB INCLUDED IF MADE IN SURGERY RESIN BONDED MARYLAND BRIDGE (PER UNIT) £250 £100 PER UNIT CONVENTIONAL FIXED BRIDGE PFM (PER UNIT) £400 £150 IF PFM £175 IF ZIRCONIA/EMAX CONVENTINAL FIXED BRIDGE ZIRCONIA (PER UNIT) £450 £175 DENTURES PARTIAL CHROME £500-750 £350-450 PARTIAL ARCRYLIC £400-500 £200-300 PARTIAL VALPLAST / FLEXI DENTURE £400-600 £300 FULL CHROME (EACH) £550 £350-400 FULL ARCRYLIC (EACH) £400-600 £250 DENTURE ADDITION £50 £40 (£20 PER ADDITIONAL) DENTURE REPAIR £50 £40 ADDITION OF CLASP £50 £40 TOOTH COLOURED CLASPS £80 £80 EACH SPORTS MOUTHGUARD FROM £75 FROM £40 NIGHT BRUXISM APPLIANCE £100 £50 CROWN REFIT £50 INCLUDED OUT OF HOURS CALL OUTS £150 £20 INVISALIGN GO £1300 PER ARCH + COST OF RETAINERS £1300 PER ARCH PLUS COST OF RETAINERS
Figure C5 – Origin Energy (Darling Downs, Mt Stuart, Roma) closing bid prices, dispatch and spot price Figure C6 – Stanwell (Barron Gorge, Kareeya, Mackay GT, Stanwell, Tarong, Tarong North) closing bid prices, dispatch and spot price
Our charges Professional services £1150 Professional services of our trained staff in overseeing all the funeral arrangements and the use of the facilities at Rosedale. Provision of vehicles and bearers £755 Hearse, limousine and four bearers for the funeral within a 20-mile radius of your nearest branch of Rosedale or the nearest crematorium Bringing the deceased into our care £399 Initial care and transfer of the deceased at any time of the day or night, within a 20-mile radius of your local branch or Rosedale. All of our funeral charges are excluding disbursements; disbursements are charges paid by Rosedale on your behalf such as: cemeteries, crematoriums, clergy, officiants, florists, doctors, newspaper announcements, etc. Rosedale respectfully request that all disbursements are paid in full 48 hours following arrangement of the funeral. For those for whom cost is an important factor or indeed a concern, we offer an economy funeral package from £1,995 which is designed to support families financially at a difficult time, particularly those who may be in receipt of benefits or who would otherwise struggle to meet the costs of a traditional funeral. Coffin selection Ashes selection Oak Veneer £299 Elvedon Cardboard £410 Elm Veneer with panelled sides £520 Hand Woven Willow £780 Wool £925 Royal Oak £995 Imperial £1210 Sovereign £1925 Other coffins are available on request Prices from £ 65 Free of charge Temporary grave marker Memorial website Donation management Should you require advice on financial assistance in paying for a funeral, please contact staff at any of our branches for information and contact telephone numbers regarding the Social Fund, Bereavement Payment, Widowed Parent’s Allowance, Bereavement Allowance, Child Funeral Charity and advice on other means of financial help available to you.
Small Receiver-In Canal (RIC) Devices Phonak Audeo V90 £2,050 Audeo V70 £1,750 Audeo V50 £1,450 Oticon Alta2 Pro £1,950 Nera2 Pro £1,550 Intiga £1,950 Kamplex KITE HD 500 £550 In The Ear Hearing Aids (ITE/CIC/MIC/ITC/IIC) Phonak Virto V90 £2,050 Virto V70 £1,750 Virto V50 £1,450 Titanium £2,150 Oticon Alta2 Pro £1,950 Nera2 Pro £1,550 Baby-Sized Receiver in Canal (RIC) Device Widex Baby 440 £1,550 Paediatric Hearing Aids Phonak Sky Q90 £1,350 Sky Q70 £950 Bone Conduction Hearing Aid Oticon BP Ponto + Headband/softband £3,150 CROS/BI-CROS Aid Phonak PHONAK CROS II £450 Tinnitus/Hyperacusis Management Pure Tone Silent Star Maskers £145 Widex ZEN2GO POA Oticon Alta2 Pro Ti £2,050 Nera2 Pro Ti £1,550 Phonak Audeo V90 £2,150 Audeo V70 £1,850 3 year warranty for repairs £125 per device
To the extent consistent with chapter 42.56 RCW, the Public Disclosure Act, CTS shall maintain the confidentiality of the Contractor’s information marked confidential or proprietary. If a request is made to view Vendor’s proprietary information, CTS will notify the Contractor of the request and of the date that the records will be released to the requester unless the Contractor obtains a court order enjoining that disclosure. If the Contractor fails to obtain the court order enjoining disclosure, CTS will release the requested information on the date specified. The State’s sole responsibility shall be limited to maintaining the above data in a secure area and to notify the Contractor of any request(s) for disclosure for so long as CTS retains the Contractor’s information in CTS records. Failure to so label such materials or failure to timely respond after notice of request for public disclosure has been given shall be deemed a waiver by the Contractor of any claim that such materials are exempt from disclosure. Except for CTS’ payment obligations, each party’s total aggregate liability arising from or related to this Addendum will be limited to the total charges paid or payable in the year immediately preceding the incident giving rise to the claim The Effective Date of this Technical Addendum shall be the date of last signature below. Approved Approved State of Washington Consolidated Technology Services Vendor, Inc. Signature Signature Print or Type Name Date Print or Type Name Date Title Title PRI T-1 Statement of Work Template This Statement of Work (SOW) 19-01-XXX is made and entered by and between the State of Washington, Consolidated Technology Services (“CTS”), and xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx(“Contractor”), collectively referred to as “Parties” pursuant to Section xxxxxxx of that certain contract No. xxxxxxxxxxxx for PRI T-1 Services. Recitals NOW THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by the Parties, the Parties hereby agree as follows. Unless otherwise defined, capitalized terms in this Amendment have the meanings ascribed to them in the Contract. The terms and conditions
CENT-3311-513 Formulation Turbiscan 230 CENT-3315-514 Glove box 210 CENT-3317-515 UV-Vis-NIR 270 CENT-28-601 Pulsed Laser Deposition 1210 CENT-28-602 Spectrofluorometer 340 CENT-28-603 Spectrofluorometer TCSPC 740 CENT-28-604 Spectrofluorometer He Cryogenic 3170 CENT-28-605 Contact Angle Device 220
Pricing Schedule Item No. Description Unit Quantity Amount 1 Binding Machine (As per the specification) No 1 Net total to Section ……………………………………… _________________________ Sub-Total……………………………………………………… _________________________ Allowance for VAT (14%) …………………………………… _________________________ Gross Price ………………………………………. _________________________
Results Table 7 outlines the individual risk factors utilised for each HAC logistic regression model. Table 7: Final risk factors adopted for each HAC group Risk Factors 01. Pressure injury 02. Falls resulting in fracture or other intracranial injury 03. Healthcare associated infection 04. Surgical complications requiring unplanned return to theatre 06. Respiratory complications 07. Venous thromboembolism 08. Renal failure 09. Gastrointestinal bleeding 10. Medication complications 11. Delirium 12. Persistent incontinence 13. Malnutrition 14. Cardiac complications Admission Status Patient Age MDC ICU Status DRG Type Charlson Score Gender Transfer Status
Appendix B: Complexity scores Table 17: Complexity scores for each HAC logistic regression model Groups 01. Pressure injury 02. Falls resulting in fracture or other intracranial injury 03. Healthcare associated infection 04. Surgical complications requiring unplanned return to theatre 06. Respiratory complications 07. Venous thromboembolism 08. Renal failure 09. Gastrointestinal bleeding 10. Medication complications 11. Delirium 12. Persistent incontinence 13. Malnutrition 14. Cardiac complications Baseline 46.6 24.1 56.4 41.2 47.3 36.6 28.2 41.3 42.9 36.6 29.8 39.1 46.0 Emergency admission 4.7 8.0 4.8 0.7 4.8 3.2 2.8 4.4 4.7 4.7 5.0 4.5 2.4 ICU Hours 10.3 4.9 10.4 13.5 15.1 11.0 21.9 7.7 7.1 10.8 7.5 10.0 12.6 Admission Transfer Status 2.8 1.2 2.1 1.7 0.4 3.2 0 2.3 1.6 2.0 2.1 2.3 1.4 DRG 9 Type Medical 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intervention 6.2 4.6 6.4 14.7 6.6 7.6 9.9 4.5 3.2 7.3 2.9 5.1 6.5 Gender Male 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Female 0 1.0 1.0 0 -1.3 0.7 -0.8 -0.6 0.4 -0.8 0.9 0 0
Appendix C: Complexity bounds Figure 5: HAC01 – Pressure Injury – Complexity bounds Figure 6: HAC02 – Falls resulting in fracture or other intracranial injury – Complexity bounds Figure 7: HAC03 – Healthcare associated infections – Complexity bounds Figure 8: HAC04 – Surgical complications requiring unplanned return to theatre – Complexity bounds Figure 9: HAC06 – Respiratory complications – Complexity bounds Figure 10: HAC07 – Venous thromboembolism – Complexity bounds Figure 11: HAC08 – Renal failure – Complexity bounds Figure 12: HAC09 – Gastrointestinal bleeding – Complexity bounds Figure 13: HAC10 – Medication complications – Complexity bounds
Figure 14: HAC11 – Delirium – Complexity bounds Figure 15: HAC12 – Persistent incontinence – Complexity bounds Figure 16: HAC13 – Malnutrition – Complexity bounds Figure 17: HAC14 – Cardiac complications – Complexity bounds
This is the fifth Pricing Framework issued by IHPA. The nature of the comments received in response to the Consultation Paper on the Pricing Framework for 2016-17 demonstrates that IHPA has developed a clear and stable methodology that guides the annual determination of the NEP and NEC. IHPA will continue to develop and refine its classification systems, counting rules, data, coding and costing standards which underpin the national activity based funding system. Finally, I would like to affirm the commitment of IHPA to transparency and continuous improvement in how it undertakes its delegated functions, grounded in an open and consultative approach to working with the health sector in the implementation of activity based funding for public hospital services. Yours sincerely Shane Solomon Chair Independent Hospital Pricing Authority
(11) Cost and pricing data and Certificates of Current Cost or Pricing Data. (12) Packing, packaging and transportation data. (13) Cost or price analysis. (14) Justification for type of contract. (15) Records of negotiation. (16) Required approvals of award and evidence of legal review. (17) Notice of award. (18) The original of the signed contract, all contract modifications and documents supporting modifications. (19) Notice to unsuccessful quoters or offerors and record of any debriefing. (20) Post-award conference records. (21) Orders issued under the contract. (22) Quality assurance records. (23) Property administration records. (24) Bills, invoices, vouchers, and supporting documents. (25) Record of payments or receipts. (26) Receiving documentation. (27) Contract completion documents. c. Audit System. A simple database reporting system to provide visibility and status of procurement actions is required and should be implemented immediately. Automation to include laptop computers will assist in establishing a more efficient system which will coincide with CONUS systems. The information will be collected and maintained by the contracting office and transferred to the PARC. The system should include the following data fields: (1) Date of receipt of requisition. (2) Date of award. (3) Type of contracting action (i.e., contract, 46 d. A supplemental agreement, like the other types of changes, must be in writing and is a bilateral agreement signed by both parties. It is used whenever it is necessary or desirable to have the contractor's consent to a modification to a contract.
Editorial Service Associate Editor: Journal of Consumer Research (July, 2002 to June, 2005) Journal of Consumer Psychology (July 2008-2015) Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Guest Editor (2016) Editorial Board Member: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (2006-2008) Journal of Advertising Research (1997-2004) Journal of Consumer Psychology (1998-2008, 2015-2018) Journal of Consumer Research (2005 – 2009) Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (2000-2002) Ad Hoc reviewer: Australian Journal of Psychology Developmental Psychology Emotion European Journal of Social Psychology International Journal of Research in Marketing Israeli Science Foundation Journal of Applied Social Psychology Journal of Experimental Social Psychology Journal of Marketing Journal of Marketing Research Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Journal of the International Society of Political Psychology Media Psychology National Science Foundation Organization Science Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin Political Psychology Psychological Review Social Cognition Publications Books MacInnis, Deborah, Park, C Whan, and Priester, Joseph R. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of Brand Relationships. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.
funds for the build of a new, VI specialist sports hall on site. Arrange for the full time use of the back stairs for all Secondary students to ensure shorter journeys around the school. Arrange more systematic use of library facilities by all students in both Primary and Secondary Departments. Though bids to charitable organisations, repair Primary climbing frame and improve play equipment for both Primary and Secondary students. Provide locked doors between the different schools, with access through key fobs to increase security but also enable access. SLT JA Governors’ Sports Hall Developmt Committee Morgen Thomas Head of Secondary HODs CO, MEF, KL, SJ HT LR Head of Secondary Dept HT HODS Gallifords Year 1 plan in place July 2017. September 2017 September 2017 December 2017 September 2017 Year 1 plan completed August 2018. September 2017 July 2018 July 2018 January 2018 Year 1 funding secured. Artist drawings and floor plans produced. Planning permission secured. Bids made to grant organisations and trusts. All students use both sets of stairs to access teaching and form rooms. Primary and Secondary libraries restructured and sued more regularly. Loan systems in place Resources increased in braille, MLP and electronic versions. Improved engagement with Primary and Secondary play equipment reported by staff and School Council. Beeches Juniors by September 2017 Arena Academy by October 2017 Beeches Infants by March 2018 3. Ensure all staff and students follow appropriate policies and practice in the event of emergencies. Share the latest evacuation plans and lockdown procedures with staff and students regularly. HT HODs All staff and students September 2017 Termly Ongoing All staff have full understanding of and follow appropriately fire regulations, lockdown procedures and bomb threat policy.
Ensure Evacu chair training updated regularly for all staff. Ensure Fire Marshal training updated regularly. Carry out Fire audit across the whole school to ensure safe practice. HT HODs All staff HT SB SJ HT SB SJ September 2017 Every three years March 2018 Termly Ongoing Termly ongoing July 2018 update. Report implementation by July 2018 All staff are able to use Evacu chairs safely in the event of an emergency. SB and SJ appropriately trained as fire marshals at all times. All identified actions addressed. School fully fire safety compliant.
4. Comparing and Discussing Begin with a student who got stuck (R3) to clarify what makes the problem difficult. Next R2: ¼ in half to create two ⅛ pieces and so can add ¼ + ⅜ and find that ¼ + ⅜ is ⅝ . R4 shares how they used a number line with both ¼ and ⅛ intervals on it to find equivalent fractions to make sense of how to add fractions with unlike denominators. Conclude w R1: 1/4 = (1x2)/(4x2) = 2/8 so ¼ + 3/8 = 2/8 + 3/8 = 5/8 In facilitating the discussion it is important that the teacher asks questions of the student that shares R2 to get them to recognize that when they broke ¼ in two pieces, those two new pieces are each ⅛ , so their number sentence should reflect that. They did not actually add ¼ + ⅜ , they changed ¼ into the equivalent fraction 2/8 so the number sentence should be 2/8 +⅜ = ⅝ . “Why did you multiply both numerator by 2?” Do scholars understand that the fractions have different unit fractions and cannot be added together as they currently are represented? Do they understand that an equivalent fraction is needed so that we are adding together the same size units? Has the area model and number line model justified to all student that ¼ and 2/8 are equivalent? Do scholars appreciate the efficiency of this calculation relative to creating an area model or a number line? 4. Summing up “Today as a hard working class we learned that we can add fractions with unlike denominators by using equivalent fractions.” 5. Reflection Sentence starters for student What evidence is there in the student reflections that they
represented the only legitimate way to construct the Temple and legislate its cult until the divinely created Sanctuary would appear. Even though the Sect withdrew from the Jerusalem Temple, they never ceased to regard the Temple Mount as the only legitimate site for the Temple. If the Dead Sea Sect intended to implement the plans of the Temple Scroll, the present problem that existed for them as the true Remnant of biblical Israel was to gain control of the Temple Mount. One this was accomplished and the site properly sanctified, they could begin to rebuild the Temple according to their restoration ideal of the pattern established at Sinai. Other scholars have argued that only one Temple could be in the context, since God says that He will dwell among Israel at this Sanctuary forever (cf. Ezek. 37:26-28). How could its temporary status "until the day of Creation …" be reconciled with this promise of permanency? The leading proponent of the one-Temple theory, Qumran scholar Ben Zion Wacholder, therefore translates the Hebrew adverb 'ad not as "until," but as "during," or "while," with the sense that God's glory would settle only on one Temple. However, if the text is read "until," it does not deny continuity between the two Temples with the Divine Presence. Just as the Shekinah was "present" with the Tabernacle and at the Tent of Meeting, and then filled the First Temple without a sense of discontinuity, so they could have argued that it would remain forever when their man-made Temple gave way to the divine creation. This man-made Temple is interpreted as a rebuilt Temple during the present age for several reasons. First, the Temple Scroll does not discuss the End of Days/Age to Come. This can be seen in the distinct terms its author uses here as opposed to the sect's eschatological writings. An example is the use here of the term hacohen hagadol ("the high priest") rather than cohen harosh ("the chief priest") found in the eschatological literature. There is also no mention of "the high priest" in Ezekiel's account of the eschatological Temple in chapters 40-48. Second, as