zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
PROPOSED PDAC AGENDA FOR Thursday, November 30, 2017 CO-420 @ 3:00 – 4:00 p.m. LPG Meeting Immediately Following 4:00-5:00 pm. Topic/Activity Lead Time Information, Discussion, Action, Follow-up Welcome and Introductions Announcements (Public) Oleson/Kwist 5 Information Consent Agenda Review and Approval of Agenda (Hand-out) and 9-28-17Minutes Conference Funding Recommendations Ian Bassett - $961.72 CCACC, Davis, CA. 4-26-18 thru 4-19-18. PDAC Funding recommended. Nick Garcia and Eric Sanchez - $2,000 (Cap). JFK Theatre Festival, Spokane, WA. 2-18-18 thru 2-24-18. PDAC Funding recommended. Edward Haven - $251.96 ($1,000 Nexus), Chicago, IL. 2-21-18 thru 2-24-18. PDAC Funding Recommended. Lucy Snow - $860.15, CCACC, Davis, Ca. 4-26-18 thru 4-29-18. PDAC Funding recommended. Info only: Funded by 3SP: Kelly Green, $1,261.00, Educating for Careers Conf., Sacramento, CA . 3-4-18 thru 3-6-18. Info only: Funded by Nexus: Roseann Erwin, $641.79, California Academic Research Libraries Conf. (CARL), Redwood City, Ca. 4-13-18 thru 4-15-18. Oleson 10 Action New Business Mini-Grants for Review Josh Bearden Update – Teaching Diversity and Global Independence at LMC . Nick Garcia – Purchase of lifetime access to Masterclasses (11) $1,000. Kwist 5 Update/Action Classified Nexus Pilot Project Kwist/Oleson/All 5 Update Staff Reports Diputado Kwist Oleson Sanchez Tatmon 10 Information Focused Flex Update Kwist 10 Discussion Follow-up 2017-18 MEETING DATES: February 22, 2018, April 26, 2018 Calendar Future Meeting Topics: TBD
MacArthur Twyla Waterson Mark Twain* Patrina Singleton * Kayla Robinson Mayo Kenneth Joslin Mayo N. & Immersion N. Peggy Moss McClure Joe Mercier McKinley TBD Mitchell JoAnn Fennell Owen Angie Teas Park Anita Schroeder Patrick Henry Judy Fessenden Peary TBD Penn Erica Fraser Remington Cassandra Funderburk Robertson Jessica Haight Salk Corsair Thurman Sequoyah Raye Nero Skelly Upper Kathryn Ackley Skelly Lower (Zarrow) Kristy Tatum Tammy Bowman Whitman Elaine Buxton Wright Haven Zarrow International (Phillips) Consuela Franklin Junior High Schools Shelly Holman Byrd Ginger Bunnell Micheal Johnson Thoreau Tom Padalino Carver Melissa Woolridge Foster Darrin Schmidt Whitney Derrick Schmidt
(a) Related Cases. Whenever more than one bankruptcy case is filed or pending in which the debtor entities are related or the cases are otherwise related, counsel may file a motion to transfer the assignment of the cases to a single judge. The motion shall specify the reasons for having the related cases heard by one judge. The motion to transfer the assignment shall be filed in the lower numbered case only. It shall identify the other cases to be assigned by case name and number in the body of the motion. The judge assigned the lower numbered case will rule on the motion. (b) Joint Administration/Substantive Consolidation. A motion for joint administration or for substantive consolidation shall include therein a motion to transfer the assignment of the cases to be jointly administered or substantively consolidated if those cases are not all assigned to one judge. Rule 1017-1 Dismissal of Case (a) Notice of Proposed Dismissal. Notice of the proposed dismissal of a case for failure to file in a timely manner the schedules, statements or chapter 11, 12 or 13 shall be given in the notice of meeting of creditors to all creditors and other interested parties. (b) Dismissal Without Further Notice. Failure of the debtor to file in a timely manner the documents required by the Rules or the Local Rules or to appear at the meeting of creditors shall be cause for dismissal of the bankruptcy case without further notice.
Motion Practice For purposes of these Local Rules, a request for an order, including a motion, application or other pleading (all of the foregoing will be referred to in this Local Rule as a "motion") shall be governed by the following requirements. (a) Motions. All motions, unless made in open court, shall include a memorandum setting forth the points and authorities relied upon in support of the motion. (b) Length of Motions and Memoranda. Unless otherwise permitted by the court, a motion and the supporting memorandum shall not exceed 15 pages, exclusive of attachments. (c) Response and Reply Times for Motions. Unless otherwise set forth in the Rules, the Local Rules, the notice prescribed in paragraph (j) or an order of the court, the party responding to a motion shall have 14 days after service within which to serve and file a responsive memorandum, and the moving party shall have 14 days after service of the responsive memorandum to serve and file a reply. (d) Unopposed or Ex Parte Motions. Motions that the moving party contends are unopposed or need not be set for hearing shall so state and be accompanied by a separate proposed order granting the relief requested. If the moving party contends that the motion should be granted on an ex parte basis, the motion shall state why it may be granted without notice and shall be accompanied by a form of order.
VIOLATION OF TITLE II OF THE ADA (42 U.S.C. §§ 12131-12134; 28 C.F.R Part 35) The allegations contained in the preceding paragraphs are incorporated by reference. Miami University has, by reason of the disabilities of qualified individuals, excluded such individuals from participation in, and denied them the benefits of, Miami University’s services, programs, and activities, and further subjected such individuals to discrimination in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 12132 and the Title II implementing regulation, 28 C.F.R. pt. 35, by: Denying qualified individuals with disabilities the opportunity to participate in or benefit from aids, benefits, or services, see 28 C.F.R. § 35.130(b)(1)(i); Affording qualified individuals with disabilities an unequal opportunity to benefit from the aids, benefits, and services that are provided to others, see 28 C.F.R. § 35.130(b)(1)(ii); Providing qualified individuals with disabilities with aids, benefits, and services that do not afford them an equal opportunity to obtain the same result, gain the same benefit, or reach the same level of achievement as that provided to others, see 28 C.F.R. § 35.130(b)(1)(iii); Providing different aids, benefits, or services to qualified individuals with disabilities than are provided to others when such actions are not necessary to provide individuals with disabilities with aids, benefits, or services that are as effective as those provided to others, see 28 C.F.R. § 35.130(b)(1)(iv); Utilizing criteria or methods of administration, including insufficient and inconsistent policies, practices, and procedures, that have the effect of subjecting
Order Miami University to take such affirmative steps as may be necessary to restore, as nearly as practicable, each identifiable person aggrieved and harmed by Miami University’s discriminatory conduct to the position that he or she would have been in but for Miami University’s conduct; Award compensatory damages in an appropriate amount to persons aggrieved and harmed by Miami University’s discrimination. Order such other appropriate relief as the interests of justice may require. Dated: ____________, 2015 CARTER M. STEWART United States Attorney Southern District of Ohio MATTHEW J. HORWITZ Assistant United States Attorney 221 E. Fourth Street, Suite 400 Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 (513) 684-6823 (Horwitz) (513) 684-6972 (Fax) Respectfully submitted, LORETTA E. LYNCH Attorney General ___________________________ VANITA GUPTA Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General EVE L. HILL Deputy Assistant Attorney General Civil Rights Division _____________________________ REBECCA B. BOND Chief KATHLEEN P. WOLFE Special Litigation Counsel KEVIN J. KIJEWSKI Deputy Chief Disability Rights Section _____________________________ WILLIAM F. LYNCH Trial Attorney PEARLINE M. HONG Trial Attorney Disability Rights Section (NYA) U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. – NYA
Work Plan Cost Breakdown 2018 2019 2020 2021 Partner Code Activities EIT Funding (€0.00) (€0.00) (%) EIT Funding (€0.00) (€0.00) EIT Funding (€0.00) (€0.00) EIT Funding (€0.00) (€0.00) Total Cost Category per Partner (Repeat table for all partners)
b. Intake of clients by performing the administrative tasks necessary for admission to a program; c. Orientation of new clients to program's rules, goals, procedures, services, costs and the rights of the client; d. Assisting the client in identifying and ranking problems to be addressed, establish goals, and agree on treatment processes; e. Implementation of a substance abuse treatment plan as directed by the supervisor; f. Implementation of case management activities that bring services, agencies, people and resources together in a planned framework of action to achieve established goals; g. Assistance in identifying appropriate crisis intervention responses to clients' needs during acute mental, emotional or physical distress; h. Education of clients by providing information about drug abuse and available services and resources; i. Facilitating the client's utilization of available support systems and community resources to meet needs identified in clinical valuation or treatment planning; j. Reporting and charting information about client's treatment, progress, and other client-related data; and k. Consultation with other professionals to assure comprehensive quality care for the client. Each of these tasks shall be performed for at least eight hours under supervision and shall be verified as a part of the application by the supervisor. C. Groups and classes attended as a part of a therapy or treatment program shall not be accepted as any part of the educational experience.
Annex 4 Budget Table (please fill in a separate table for each year of the project) Eligible costs Breakdown CU Funds (L.E.) (if any) (L.E.) (A) Incentives Team member No. % of time spent on the project Monthly incentive No. of months PI 1 *Researcher A *Researcher B *Researcher C Manual labor Technicians Consultants Total incentives (B) Equipment A separate breakdown is required (C) Expendable Supplies & Materials Stationery Miscellaneous Laboratory supplies (chemicals, kits… etc.) Total expendable supplies & materials (D) Travel International Air tickets Per Diem (governmental regulations apply to allowed per diem) Domestic Transportation (Bus/train tickets, public transportation, …etc.) Per Diem (governmental regulations apply to allowed per diem) Conference registration Total travel ( E ) Other Direct Costs Computer supplies/services (software, printer cartridges, …etc. ) Report preparation and publication costs Training Workshops Others Total other direct costs ( F) Total Budget Sum of (A ) through ( E ) above *Researcher A = Ph.D. holder Researcher B = M.Sc. holder Researcher C = B.Sc. holder
(1) the name of the witness; (2) the location of residence or business; (3) the dates the witness actually testified in Court; and (4) the number of days the witness traveled to and from the place of trial or hearings, the exact number of miles traveled and the actual cost of any common carrier transportation incurred. (d) Clerk of Court Taxing Witness Fees. The Clerk of Court shall tax the witness fees after the bill of costs is filed, provided the information contained therein corresponds with the official records of the Court. If there is a discrepancy between the bill of costs and the official court records, the Clerk of Court shall tax the witness fees in accordance with the official court records. (e) Costs in Removed Cases. In cases removed from state courts, the costs incurred in the state courts by the prevailing party shall be taxed upon filing a bill of costs with the Clerk of Court. (f) Items Taxable as Costs. It shall be the policy of the Court to allow certain items of costs and disallow other items, as specified in any order of the Court: (1) Fees of the Clerk of Court and United States Marshal. The filing fees paid to the Clerk of Court shall be taxable. Fees of the United States Marshal, as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1921, shall be taxable. The costs for service by a sheriff or other authorized person shall be taxable, except that counsel have the duty to mitigate costs by having process served by a person located as closely as possible to the person to be served, in order to minimize mileage fees. (2) Fees of Court Reporter. (A) When a transcript is obtained for purposes of appeal, the cost of the original is taxable if the appeal is successful. (B) Transcripts of trial proceedings obtained for the purposes of preparing proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, when directed by the Court in trials to the Court, shall be taxable to the prevailing party. (C) Daily transcripts of trial proceedings obtained for the convenience of counsel are not taxable as costs unless advance authority has been sought and obtained from the Court.
TOTAL BID - Generator Service Contract July 1, 2018 to June 30 2019 (Total Sum Based on Schedule of Values) $ Hourly Rates (Straight Time) Hourly Rates (Overtime) Hourly Rates (Holidays) $ $ $ COMBINED TOTAL BID - Generator Service Contract (Lump Sum) Total Sum of Bids for July 1, 2018 to June 30. 2019 $ The Contractor hereby agrees to a Guaranteed Emergency “On-site Service” Response Time after contacted by a Town agency will be no more than (hrs) Optional 2nd year Generator Service Contract July 1, 2019 – June 30, 2020 TOTAL BID - Generator Service Contract year two, July 1, 2019 to June 30 2020 (Total Sum Based on Schedule of Values) $ Hourly Rates (Straight Time) Hourly Rates (Overtime) Hourly Rates (Holidays) $ $ $ COMBINED TOTAL BID - Generator Service Contract (Lump Sum) Total Sum of Bids for July 1, 2019 to June 30. 2020. $
BY OWNER: Town of Waterford, Connecticut By: Daniel M. Steward – Its First Selectman BY CONTRACTOR Address: By: ____________________________________________ Title: By: Town Counsel:
Alabama Disabilities Advocacy Program PROPOSED ADVOCACY PRIORITIES Fiscal Year 2019 The Alabama Disabilities Advocacy Program (ADAP) protects and promotes the civil rights of children and adults with physical, cognitive, and mental health disabilities in Alabama. We are Alabama’s only statewide, cross-disability, comprehensive legal advocacy organization. We believe that persons with disabilities are entitled to equal access to the opportunities afforded to all members of American society. Annually, ADAP solicits input from persons with disabilities, their families, and other members of the disability community to identify priority issue areas on which we should focus. These priority issues frame the advocacy services that we undertake and to which we allocate ADAP’s resources. Our proposed priorities for the fiscal year 2019 are: PROTECTION FROM ABUSE & NEGLECT Individuals with disabilities will be free from abuse and neglect and live in healthier, safer or otherwise improved facility or community settings. COMMUNITY ACCESS Individuals with disabilities will have access to appropriate and individualized community services, including assistive technology, which will enhance their ability to live independently. EMPLOYMENT Persons with disabilities will have meaningful access to integrated employment and be paid at least minimum wage. SUPPORTED DECISION-MAKING With needed supports, individuals with disabilities will be able to make everyday decisions about their lives, including matters related to where they live, how their money is managed, and their healthcare. EDUCATION Youth with disabilities will be provided a free appropriate public education in their least restrictive environment to move them toward independent living and, depending on their individual goals, secondary schooling or employment upon graduation. VOTING Individuals with disabilities will be given equal opportunity to register to vote and to vote privately and independently. FINANCIAL SECURITY FOR SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFICIARIES Individuals with disabilities who receive Social Security benefits administered by a representative payee will be free from financial exploitation.
Proposed Public Space Protection Order (Dog Control) 2018 Cannock Chase District Council Public Space Protection Order (Dog Control) 2018 This Order is made by Cannock District Council (“the Authority”) under Section 59 of the Antisocial Behaviour Crime and Policing Act 2014, because it appears to the Authority that a Public Space Protection Order would reduce dog related anti-social behaviour taking place in the District. The Council is satisfied that the conditions required for the introduction of a Public Space Protection Order have been met, in that : (a) activities carried on in the relevant areas as described below have had a detrimental effect on the quality of life of those in the locality, or it is likely that these activities will be carried on in the public place and they will have such an effect; (b) the effect, or likely effect, of the activities is, or is likely to be, of a persistent or continuing nature, is, or is likely to be, such as to make the activities unreasonable, and justifies the restrictions imposed by the Order.. This Order relates to all relevant land within the District of Cannock Chase as specified in the following schedules This Order may be cited as the Cannock District Council Public Space Protection Order (Dog Control) 2018. BY THIS ORDER The effect of the Order is to impose the following requirements at all times:- 1 Dog Fouling 1.1 This article applies to any land which is open to the air and to which the public are entitled or permitted to have access (with or without payment). For the purposes of this Order land which is open to the air on at least one side is to be treated as land which is open to the air. The order does not apply to land put at the disposal of the Forestry Commissioners under Section 39 of the Forestry Act 1967. 1.2 If a dog defecates at any time on land to which this Order applies and a person who is in charge of the dog at that time fails to remove the faeces from the land forthwith, that person shall be guilty of an offence, unless- that person has a reasonable excuse for not doing so; or the owner, occupier or other person or authority having control of the land has consented (generally and specifically) to his/her failure to do so.
1.6.1 Proposals Involving Non-U.S. Organizations 1.6.2 Export Control 1.6.2(a) Export Control Guidelines for Proposals Involving Foreign Participation 1.6.2(b) Export Control Material in Proposals 1.7 Guidelines for Proposal Preparation 2. PROPOSAL PREPARATION AND ORGANIZATION 2.1 Overview 2.1.1 Using NSPIRES, the NASA Proposal Data System 2.1.2 Using 2.1.3 Restriction on the use of Classified Material 2.2 Standard Proposal Style Formats 2.3 Proposal Contents 2.3.1 Overview of Proposal 2.3.1(a) Proposal Checklist 2.3.1(b) Assembly of Electronic Proposals 2.3.1(c) NASA Requirements for Uploaded PDF Files 2.3.2 Required Cover Pages and Forms 2.3.2(a) NSPIRES Cover Page and Budget Form 2.3.2(b) Grants.gov Required Forms 2.3.3 Proposal Summary (abstract) Increasing Access to Research 2.3.5 Table of Contents 2.3.6 Scientific/Technical/Management Section 2.3.7 References and Citations 2.3.8 Biographical Sketch(s) 2.3.9 Current and Pending Support 2.3.10 Statements of Commitment and Letters of Support Budget Justification: Narrative and Details 2.3.11(a) Required Budget Narrative 2.3.11(b) Required Budget Details 2.3.11(c) Other Budget Guidelines 2.3.12 Special Notifications and/or Certifications 2.3.12(a) Special Notifications and/or Certifications 2.3.12(b) Proposals Involving Non-U.S. Organizations 2.3.13 Table of Personnel and Work Effort 2.3.14 Subcontracting plans 2.3.15 Reprint(s)/Preprint(s)/Website(s) 3. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION PROCEDURES 3.1 Notice of Intent (NOI) to Propose 3.2 On-Time and Late Proposals 3.3 Submission of Proposals 3.3.1 Submission of Proposals Through NSPIRES 3.3.2 Submission of Proposals Through Grants.gov
All awards must comply with the . While most research awards will not trigger action specific to NEPA reviews, there are some activities, including international actions that will need to comply with NEPA. For example, the following activities would likely require NEPA analysis: suborbital-class flights, especially flights not conducted by a NASA Program Office; activities involving construction/fieldwork that would involve groundbreaking or the installation of a field station; and, activities involving the use of expendable weather reconnaissance devices (dropsondes). Proposers should plan and budget accordingly if environmental impacts are anticipated. Anticipated environmental impacts should be documented in Section VIII – Other Project Information of the proposal cover page submitted to NASA. Questions concerning environmental compliance requirements may be addressed to Tina Norwood, NASA NEPA Manager, at . Flight Activities Proposals that include flight activities (not normal passenger travel) such as aircraft or helicopter flight services, including Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)/Drones operations or the acquisition or construction of such flight vehicles, must comply with . Questions concerning flight compliance requirements may be addressed to Norman Schweizer at . 3.22 Assembly of Electronic Proposals For proposals submitted electronically, the required parts of the proposal are submitted as one or more unlocked, searchable PDF files. Proposal parts and forms will not be accepted in any other format. Required and permitted appendices may be included either in the PDF file containing the Scientific/Technical/Management plan or as separate PDF files attached to the electronic submission, but not both. Sections of proposals transferred from Grants.gov to NSPIRES may appear in a slightly different order. 3.23 NASA Requirements for Uploaded PDF Files It is essential that all PDF files submitted meet NASA requirements. This will ensure that the submitted files can be ingested by NSPIRES regardless of whether the proposal is submitted via NSPIRES or Grants.gov. PDF files that do not meet NASA requirements cannot be ingested by the NSPIRES system; such files may be declared noncompliant and not submitted to peer review for evaluation. The file size limit for proposals submitted electronically to NASA through either NSPIRES or Grants.gov is 20 MB. In order to facilitate the review of the proposal, any embedded photos and graphic files should be compressed and cropped to an appropriate size and resolution. In addition, any proposer who creates files using TeX or LaTeX is required to first create a DVI file and then convert the DVI file to Postscript and then to PDF.
"NASA Research Announcements" NFS 1835.016-71 "Instructions for Responding to NASA Research Announcements" NFS 1852.235-72 Contact with NASA personnel: While NASA program personnel may be contacted to discuss general program objectives with prospective proposers, they are forbidden from providing specific advice on budgetary or technical issues beyond those published in the FA that would give an unfair competitive advantage unless this same information is openly available to all interested proposers. Restriction on the Use of Classified Material It is NASA policy that proposals should not contain security-classified material. However, should the project proposed approach require access to classified information, or should the result of the project generate such material, the proposer shall comply with all Government security regulations. Pre-Award Costs For a grants or cooperative agreements, expenses incurred within the 90-day period preceding the effective date of the award may be authorized, but such expenses are made at the recipient's risk. NASA will not pay any pre-award costs incurred for unfunded proposals. Limited Release of Proposers Confidential Business Information For proposal evaluation and other administrative processing NASA may find it necessary to release information submitted by the proposer to individuals not employed by NASA. Business information that would ordinarily be entitled to confidential treatment may be included in the information released to these individuals. Accordingly, by submission of this proposal the proposer hereby consents to a limited release of its confidential business information (CBI). Proposals Involving Non-U.S. Organizations Except as set forth in the certification regarding restriction on doing business with China, NASA welcomes proposals from non-U.S. organizations and proposals that include the participation of non-U.S. organizations. Proposals that propose research to be performed by a non-U.S. organization or with a non-U.S. organization as part of a proposal submitted by a U.S. organization are normally supported through a non-exchange of funds agreement. This policy pertains to the nature of the proposing organization, and not the nationality or citizenship of the individuals listed in the proposal. If a proposal with a non-U.S. partner is selected, NASA will determine whether such participation should be covered by and implemented through an international agreement between NASA and the sponsoring foreign agency or funding/sponsoring institution under which the parties agree to each bear the cost of discharging their respective responsibilities.
Example: Objective Output / Expected Result Activity Time Unit Performance indicator Sources and means of verification Impact Indicator Sources and means of verification Assumptions & risks % of Completion 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 To provide information on the ecology and importance of “Coral Island” to visitors 1. A marine interpretive route has been established 1. Design of the route X x x Map of the final route Printed map Reports of tourist visits to the marine interpretative route by the tourist guides There are currently at least two routes 30% 2. Design of the interpretive booklets x x x Draft of the final booklet content and art 3. Printing of interpretive booklets X x x x 2,300 booklets printed Printed booklet Printing costs increase. 4. Distribution of booklet and training of tourist guides on their use x X 3 training workshops 50 tourist guides trained List of participants to the workshops Tourists understand the importance of conserving “Coral Island” and respecting its regulations The National Tourism Institute has a different training program installed. Please find the table to be completed in Annex 1. Add rows as necessary.
ANNEX 2. PROJECT BUDGET Project title: __________________________________________________________________________________________________ Budget item Unit No. Of Units (total) Unitcost TOTAL Amount requested to MAR Fund Contribution amount from other sources (cash) Contribution amount from other sources (in-kind) Amount contributed by the organization
19. ____ 21. ____ 26. ____ *29. ____ = ____ You Wrote Change to 1 5 2 4 3 3 4 2 5 1 Total: _____ Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale Just like you did on Compassion 2. ____ The sum of my Secondary Trauma questions is So My Score Equals And my Secondary Traumatic Stress level is 22 or less 43 or less Low Between 23 and 41 Around 50 Average 42 or more 57 or more High Satisfaction, copy your rating on each of 5. ____ these questions on to this table and add 7. ____ them up. When you have added then up 9. ____ you can find your score on the table to the right. 11. ____ ____ ____ 23. ____ 25. ____ 28. ____ Total: _____
WHAT IS MY SCORE AND WHAT DOES IT MEAN? In this section, you will score your test so you understand the interpretation for you. To find your score on each section, total the questions listed on the left and then find your score in the table on the right of the section. Compassion Satisfaction Scale Copy your rating on each of these 3. ____ The sum of my Compassion Satisfaction questions is So My Score Equals And my Compassion Satisfaction level is 22 or less 43 or less Low Between 23 and 41 Around 50 Average 42 or more 57 or more High questions on to this table and add 6. ____ them up. When you have added then 12. ____ up you can find your score on the 16. ____ table to the right. 18. ____ 20. ____ 22. ____ 24. ____ 27. ____ 30. ____ Total: _____ Burnout Scale The sum of my Burnout Questions is So my score equals And my Burnout level is 22 or less 43 or less Low Between 23 and 41 Around 50 Average 42 or more 57 or more High On the burnout scale you will need to *1. ____ = ____ take an extra step. Starred items are *4. ____ = ____ “reverse scored.” If you scored the 8. ____ item 1, write a 5 beside it. The reason 10. ____ we ask you to reverse the scores is *15. ____ = ____ because scientifically the measure *17. ____ = ____ works better when these questions 19. ____ are asked in a positive way though 21. ____ they can tell us more about their 26. ____ negative form. For example, question *29. ____ = ____ 1. “I am happy” tells us more about You Wrote Change to 5 2 4 3 3 4 2 5 1 the effects Total: _____ of helping when you are not happy so you reverse the score Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale
i) that the information provided is to the best of my knowledge accurate ii) to note the schedule of awarding and related fees published by ProQual and to remit fees against invoices issued in respect of awarding and related services provided by ProQual Signed: Date: FURTHER INFORMATION Further information on ProQual Awarding Body is available from: ProQual Awarding Body ProQual House Westbridge Court Annie Med Lane South Cave HU15 2HG Telephone 01430 423822 Fax 01482 333859 Email
when handling blood or bodily fluids containing blood?); and (J) Precautions in transporting children if your child-care home plans to transport a child whose chronological or developmental age is younger than nine years old. This agency certifies that legal counsel has reviewed the proposal and found it to be within the state agency's legal authority to adopt. Issued in Austin, Texas, on . Title 40, Social Services & Assistance, Part 19, Dept. of Family and Protective Services Chapter 747, Minimum Standards for Child-Care Homes Subchapter D, Personnel Division 2, Primary Caregiver of a Licensed Child-Care Home TAC Section Number(s) §747.1107, §747.1119 Proposed Action X Amendment Proposed Date of Adoption: X Other (Specify) 30 Days After Publication The amendment is proposed under Human Resources Code (HRC) §40.0505 and Government Code §531.0055, which provide that the Health and Human Services Executive Commissioner shall adopt rules for the operation and provision of services by the health and human services agencies, including the Department of Family and Protective Services; and HRC §40.021, which provides that the Family and Protective Services Council shall study and make recommendations to the Executive Commissioner and the Commissioner regarding rules governing the delivery of services to persons who are served or regulated by the department. The amendments implement HRC §§42.042 and 42.0421 and portions of the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 2014, which is codified in 42 USC §9857 et seq. §747.1107. What qualifications must I meet to be the primary caregiver of a licensed child-care home? (a) Except as otherwise provided in this division, a primary caregiver for a licensed child-care home must: (1) - (2) (No change.); (3) Have a certificate of completion of the Licensing pre-application course [orientation] within one year prior to your application date; (4) Have current certification in CPR and first aid with rescue breathing and
34 CFR §300.512 General Any party to a due process hearing (including a hearing relating to disciplinary procedures) has the right to: Be accompanied and advised by a lawyer and/or persons with special knowledge or training regarding the problems of children with disabilities; Present evidence and confront, cross-examine, and require the attendance of witnesses; Prohibit the introduction of any evidence at the hearing that has not been disclosed to that party at least five business days before the hearing; Obtain a written, or, at your option, electronic, word-for-word record of the hearing; and Obtain written, or, at your option, electronic findings of fact and decisions. Additional disclosure of information At least five business days prior to a due process hearing, you and the school district must disclose to each other all evaluations completed by that date and recommendations based on those evaluations that you or the school district intend to use at the hearing. A hearing officer may prevent any party that fails to comply with this requirement from introducing the relevant evaluation or recommendation at the hearing without the consent of the other party. Parental rights at hearings You must be given the right to: Have your child present; Open the hearing to the public; and Have the record of the hearing, the findings of fact and decisions provided to you at no cost. 34 CFR §300.513 Decision of hearing officer A hearing officer’s decision on whether your child received a free appropriate public education (FAPE) must be based on substantive grounds. In matters alleging a procedural violation, a hearing officer may find that your child did not receive FAPE only if the procedural inadequacies: Interfered with your child’s right to a free appropriate public education (FAPE); Significantly interfered with your opportunity to participate in the decision-making process regarding the provision of a free appropriate public education (FAPE) to your child; or Caused a deprivation of an educational benefit. Construction clause None of the provisions described above can be interpreted to prevent a hearing officer from ordering a school district to comply with the requirements in the procedural safeguards section of the federal regulations under Part B of the IDEA (34 CFR §§300.500 through 300.536).
Star, 9/23/2017. Increasing graduation rates decreases crime rates. Early childhood education tied to better graduation rates, Washington Examiner, 8/24/2008. There is not a sunset provision in this initiative because it will be needed in perpetuity Although the tax is regressive, the average family will only pay $3.00 per month, and since richer families buy more, they will pay more. The scholarships level the playing field between poor and rich children. The fund does not put a financial burden on the City because the legislation provides that it pay for itself. The non-profit that administers the fund will be subject to intensive audit and reporting requirements. Not All Tucson Education Advocates Support Proposed Sales Tax for Preschool Scholarship, Arizona Daily Star, 9/23/2017. Cons (Opposed): Sales tax is regressive and puts the highest burden on those it is designed to help. There is no sunset date in the ballot initiative. All of the decisions regarding the initiative are made by the Commission, which includes no more than two early childhood educators and as few as two early childhood experts. Members of the business community on the Commission could have conflicts of interest. Luke Knipe, former City Council staff member and Democratic political operative in Not All Tucson Education Advocates Support Proposed Sales Tax for Preschool Scholarship, Arizona Daily Star, 9/23/2017. The non-profit that administers the fund will not be subject to open records laws that government entities are subject to, making it difficult for the public to evaluate the return on investment. Program would only be for students in Tucson, but some students live in school districts including areas both inside and outside of Tucson. For example, 30% of Sunnyside
If Yes, how many times during the reporting period did this occur? During the reporting period, please select the reasons prosecution was denied. Select all that apply Victims declined to participate Investigations resulted in insufficient evidence Cases involved expired statute of limitations Report was determined to be unfounded by investigator or prosecutor Resource constraints Offender is already serving a long sentence for another crime Other If other, please explain Please submit to: West Virginia Division of Justice and Community Services Attention: SAKI Site Coordinator 1124 Smith Street Suite 3100 Charleston, West Virginia 25301-1323 Phone: 304-558-8814 Fax Number: 304-558-0391 Report Due Dates: Reporting Quarter Date due to DJCS 04/01/2017 – 06/30/2017 Due to DJCS by 07/15/2017 07/01/2017 – 09/30/2017 Due to DJCS by 10/15/2017 10/01/2017 – 12/31/2017 Due to DJCS by 01/15/2018 01/01/2018 – 03/31/2018 Due to DJCS by 04/15/2018 04/01/2018 – 06/30/2018 Due to DJCS by 07/15/2018 07/01/2018 – 09/30/2018 Due to DJCS by 10/15/2018
REPORTABLE CASE NO: SA 62/2013 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NAMIBIA In the matter between: PROSECUTOR-GENERAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA Appellant And JOÃO CARLOS VIDAL GOMES First Respondent ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA Second Respondent MINISTER OF JUSTICE OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA Third Respondent REGIONAL COURT MAGISTRATE: SWAKOPMUND Fourth Respondent MARTIN NAMBALA Fifth Respondent MELKISEDEK SHEEHAMA Sixth Respondent SAKARIA SAKARIA SAPANGE Seventh Respondent Neutral Citation: Prosecutor-General of the Republic of Namibia v Minister of Justice of the Republic of Namibia (SA 62-2013) [2015] NASC (19 August 2015) Coram: MAINGA JA, SMUTS JA and O’REGAN, AJA Heard: 5 March 2015 Delivered: 19 August 2015 __________________________________________________________________ APPEAL JUDGMENT __________________________________________________________________ SMUTS JA (MAINGA JA and O’REGAN AJA concurring):
As a general principle, courts would decline to hear matters in which there is no live or existing controversy. This is to avoid pronouncing upon issues which have become academic and have no practical effect. But the fact that a case has become moot between the parties should not constitute an absolute bar to the justiciability of an issue, particularly in constitutional matters. It is a matter to be decided in the court’s discretion. In the exercise of a court’s discretion, an important factor to be considered is whether the court’s order will have any practical effect upon the parties or on others and for achieving legal certainty. This is the approach adopted both in South Africa and in England. In R v Security of State for the Home Department, Ex parte Salem, it was said by Lord Slynn of Hadley: ‘The discretion to hear disputes, even in the area of public law, must, however be exercised with caution and appeals which are academic between the parties should not be heard unless there is a good reason in the public interest for doing so, as for example (but only by way of example) when a discrete point of statutory construction arises which does not involve detailed consideration of facts and where a large number of similar cases exist or are anticipated so that the issue will most likely need to be resolved in the near future.’ Although the substantive issue is now moot between the parties, it should be noted that the question of costs remains live as the High Court made an adverse costs order against the PG. Ordinarily, however, a continuing dispute about a costs order will not suffice on its own for the court to exercise its discretion to determine an issue that is no longer live between the parties. In this case, there are two reasons why it is appropriate for this court to decide the issue in this appeal. First, the order
9/6 Writing Silvia book (skip ch. 6-7) Lamott RP (a) 9/13 Library visit with Paul McDonough Reading selection project 9/20 The Body I Trysh Travis Alyssa Zucker Travis Zucker 9/27 English/GSWS Kenneth Kidd Judy Page Kidd Page RP (b) 10/4 The Body II Laura Guyer Connie Shehan Guyer, Wayne, & Hardt Crawley, Foley, & Shehan Conference Wiki project 10/11 Thesis and Non-Thesis options Kendal Broad and program alum Past M.A. project Signs project 10/18 No class—optional individual meetings with Alyssa RP (c) 10/25 Queer in the Capital (1-3 p.m.) Ustler Atrium Faculty visit (3-3:50 p.m.) Manoucheka Celeste Celeste RP (d) 11/1 Peer review Faculty visits Laurie Taylor CC Suarez Tace Hedrick Jefferson, & Taylor Suarez RP (e) 11/8 Sexualities Kendal Broad Maggie Galvan Jodi Schorb Broad Galvan Schorb 11/15 Professional development Identity Politics Difficult conversations NWSA Advice essays TWIG Arao & Clemens 11/22 No Class—Thanksgiving Break 11/29 Affiliate faculty exploration/ Student Presentations Affiliate faculty project RP (f) certificate and BA/MA students only 12/6 Student Presentations in first year panel with second year students and faculty (meet in Atrium) Lunch served starting at 12:30 RP (f) MA students 12/11 No class--Finals RP (g)
Prospect Primary School Calendar Term 2 2016 Week Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Sat-Sun 1 2/5 3/5 4/5 RAN Training 6pm Staff Room 5/5 RM 18 Zoo Snooze 6/5 Assembly 9:05am Mother’s Day stall 7/5-8/5 2 9/5 10/5 RM 18 Walk 11/5 Rm 17 Zoo Snooze 12/5 Newsletter RAN Training 12 pm Staff Room RM 11 Zoo Snooze 13/5 14/5-15/5 3 16/5 17/5 PUPIL FREE DAY 18/5 Governing Council 19/5 20/5 21/5-22/5 4 23/5 24/5 RAN Training 6pm Staff Room 25/5 26/5 Newsletter 27/5 Assembly 9:05am Strings Workshop @ Klemzig 28/5-29/5 5 30/5 31/5 ICAS Science Test 1/6 2/6 3/6 Reconciliation Assembly 9:05am **Disco** 4/6-5/6 6 6/6 7/6 School Photos RM 18 Walk Deadly Australians 8/6 RM 7,8,9 Narnu Camp 9/6 Newsletter Footsteps RM 7,8,9 Narnu Camp 10/6 Assembly 9:05am RM 7,8,9 Narnu Camp 11/6-12/6 7 13/6 QUEEN’S BIRTHDAY PUBLIC HOLIDAY 14/6 PUPIL FREE DAY 15/6 Deadly Australians Performance in Hall RM 7 16/6 Footsteps 17/6 18/6-19/6 8 20/6 21/6 22/6 Governing Council 23/6 Newsletter Footsteps 24/6 Assembly 9:05am 11:30 School Tour for new parents 25/6-26/6 9 27/6 28/6 29/6 30/6 Footsteps 1/7 Music is Fun Band 1:50-3:05pm 2/7-3/7 10 4/7 5/7 RM 18 Walk 6/7 7/7 Newsletter Footsteps 8/7 Assembly 9:05am END OF TERM EARLY DISMISSAL 2:15PM 9/7-10/7 RAN-Responding to Abuse and Neglect Training Part of the Child Protection induction for volunteers Ring Front Office if attending.
Prospect Primary School Calendar Term 2 2017 Week Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Sat-Sun 1 1/5 2/5 3/5 SAPOL Cyber Safety Yrs 3-6 4/5 Opacise R-7 5/5 Choir Assessment 11.35am 6/7-7/5 7/5 Grounds Working Bee 10am 2 8/9 9/9 10/5 NAPLAN Yrs 3, 5 & 7 11/5 Opacise R-7 12/5 Assembly 9:05am 13/5-14/5 3 15/5 Rms 1, 2, 3 & 4 Camp Rms 9, 10 & 11 Camp 16/5 17/5 External School Review 18/5 E-Newsletter Opacise R-7 19/5 20/5-21/5 4 22/5 23/5 24/5 Governing Council Training 6pm Mtg 7pm 25/5 Opacise R-7 Lab on Legs Seniors 26/5 Assembly 9:05am Lab on Legs Seniors 27/5-28/5 5 29/5 Reconciliation Week JP Concert ASO 30/5 Rm 2 Night of the Notables 31/5 Rm 1 Night of the Notables 1/6 Opacise R-7 2/6 School Photos 3/6-4/6 6 5/6 6/6 7/6 8/6 E-Newsletter 9/6 Assembly 9:05am 10/6-11/6 7 12/6 Queen’s Birthday Public Holiday 13/6 Pupil Free Day Partnership Moderation 14/6 15/6 Lab on Legs Rms 5&6 16/6 17/6-18/6 8 19/6 20/6 21/6 Governing Council 7pm 22/6 23/6 Assembly 9:05am 24/6-25/6 9 27/6 28/6 29/6 30/6 E-Newsletter 31/6 1/7-2/7 10 3/7 NAIDOC Week 4/7 5/7 6/7 7/7 Assembly 9:05am Early Dismissal 2.15pm 8/7-9/7
The asterisk wildcard is one of the most useful ones on the list. Here’s how it works. When you use an asterisk in a search term on Google search, it will leave a placeholder that may be automatically filled by the search engine later. This is a brilliant way to find song lyrics if you don’t know all the words. Let’s look at the syntax. “Come * right now * me” To you or me, that may look like nonsense. However, Google search will search for that phrase knowing that the asterisks can be any word. More often than not, you’ll find they are lyrics to The Beatles song “Come Together” and that’s what the search will tell you. 7. Find sites that are similar to other sites This is a unique one that could be used by practically everyone if they knew it existed. Let’s say you have a favorite website. It can be anything. However, that website is getting a little bit boring and you want to find other websites like it. You would use this trick. Below is the syntax. related: If you search that above, you won’t find a link to Amazon. Instead, you’ll find links to online stores like Amazon. Sites like Barnes & Noble, Best Buy, and others that sell physical items online. It’s a powerful Google search tool that can help you find new sites to browse. 8. Use Google search to do math
Truck Drivers (4159) Contract, Program and Project Administrators (3738) Aged and Disabled Carers (3574) Gardeners (3555) Inquiry Clerks (3297) Urban and Regional Planners (3237) Labourers nfd (3055) Welfare Support Workers (2986) Other Miscellaneous Labourers (2933) Slide 15 Slide 16 Slide 17
The candidates should bring the following documents at the time of interview. Original mark list of qualifying examinations. Original certificates, the copies of which are enclosed in the application form. Original receipt for the payment of application form cost Conduct certificate. Selection : Selection shall be made on merit assessed on the basis of total marks acquired by the candidate in Part II of optional subjects, ie Physics, Chemistry & Biology for Plus Two or equivalent examination. Fees : Following will be the fee for all the two courses, which will be remitted at the time of admission Particulars 1st Year 2nd Year Admission Fee 1000 Nil Tuition Fee 40000 40000 Library Fee 2000 2000 Registration Fee 500 Nil Laboratory Fee 3000 2000 Stationery Fee 1500 1500 Miscellaneous 2000 2000 Caution Deposit 1000 Nil TOTAL 51000 47500 The caution deposit will be refunded on completion of the course, after deducting the cost towards breakages/damages of articles, if any. SREE NARAYANA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (Managed by Gurudeva Charitable Trust) Chalakka, North Kuthiyathode P.O., Ernakulam District- 683 594, Kerala Ph : 91-484-2479199/2573023/2573024 Co-ordinator : 9446462745 Fax : 91-484-2478093 E-mail – ha@snims.org PROSPECTUS PARAMEDICAL DIPLOMA (DMLT/DOTAT) COURSES 2015-2016
first aid/medicine, cold water survival, etc.). Also describe any relevant experience/training in actual rescue or survival operations or programs, hunter safety programs, etc. Give dates of training or participation and indicate if certification is current (if applicable). Note: the successful applicant and assistant guides are required to submit current first aid and CPR certification prior to permit issuance. 2. Describe your emergency preparedness or safety plan. List emergency communications equipment and address your plans, if any, in the event of mechanical failures, or other types of accidents/incidents. 3. List all safety related equipment and supplies, in addition to the communications equipment listed above. Applicant's Name _____________________________ Form D - Page 1 FORM E History of Violations, Accidents, and Incidents 1) Since January 1, 2007, have you or any of your former, current or business that were, are, or will be with your guiding