zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Set Production Assistants COLEMAN TERRELL ANDRE MILETI JACOB LOTHERS Assistant to Martin McDonagh LOWE MCKEE Assistants to Graham Broadbent and Pete Czernin MORGANA SNEDDON JILL PUCKETT Assistants to Frances McDormand EMILY FOLEY BERNICE MILLER Assistant to Woody Harrelson JOSH BARKER Assistant to Sam Rockwell NATHAN EARLY Transportation Coordinator NEIL HYMAN Transportation Captains WAYNE JONES JOHN STEPHENS Transportation Dispatcher DEANNA DAVIS Drivers CHARLES DICUS SANDRA REYNOLDS KEVIN K. GORHAM LANCE SUDANO DAVID ZYDORSKI ALTON LEE PIERCE DANNY D. CURTIS SARAH HUDSON JAMES A. GRIFFIS ARNOLD R. GAY TONIE FARACE MARY PETZ GENEVIEVE BARKER JOHN BELL PEYTON ADAMS WILLIAM "BILL" PITTS DAVID C. PENIX LOGAN A. WILSON DAVE ELLIOTT ROBERT W. SIMPSON DENNIS H. JONES KEVIN CRAIG TODD STACEY ANDERSON DEBBIE ADAMS RICK DAVIS PAMELA C. RAY JAMES L. JAMISON WILLIAM PITTS ROBERT DEMPSEY STEVE SAMS CHRIS MANEY CHARLES WARREN Caterer OUT OF THE PAN CATERING
2D Artists OLIVIA BERESFORD TIAGO FARIA ALASDAIR MCNEILL SUSANNA RICCIO DAVID SINGER DAN VICTOIRE JENNY WAN Camera Track NOEL O'MALLEY ALEXANDER HA SILVIO CASTAGNA MUSCELLA EMANUELE FARNESI Roto Artists ANDREA ACETO ATTILA GASPARETZ CRISTINA SERRELI LINDSEY LO PRESTI Visual Effects System Administrator NISHET SHAH Visual Effects Editor EDD GAMLIN Visual Effects Production Assistant LISA DOWNEY-DENT Digital Intermediate Provided by GOLDCREST POST PRODUCTION Digital Colorist ADAM GLASMAN Digital On-Line Editor DANIEL TOMLINSON Head of Production ROB FARRIS Digital Intermediate Producer JONATHAN COLLARD Digital Intermediate Assistant Producer GEMMA MCKEON Digital Intermediate Assistant Colorist MARIA CHAMBERLAIN Digital Intermediate Assistants GEORGINA CRANMER LAWRENCE HOOK
Voice Casting JOHNNY GIDCOMB Additional Voices SUSAN LESLIE LEX LANG PAUL PAPE JASON GRANT SMITH ANDREW HEYL MAGGIE BAIRD RUTH ZALDUONDO VICKI DAVIS DANIELLE HARTNETT MATT NOLAN ANGELO VACCO RICHARD CANSINO STEVE KRAMER JILL REMEZ JOANNA LEEDS JENNIFER CAIN JOSHUA W. BINDER HOPE LEVY BEN PRONSKY KIRK THORNTON JEFF BERGMAN Preview Engineer LEE TUCKER Main Titles IMAGINARY FORCES Fox Searchlight Pictures 70’s Logo SHINE End Titles SCARLET LETTERS Digital Intermediate by EFILM Supervising Digital Colorist MITCH PAULSON Digital Intermediate Producer LOAN PHAN Digital Intermediate Editor DEVON MILLER Digital Intermediate Color Assistant JOEL McWILLIAMS Digital Intermediate Assistant Producer EMMA ESCAMILLA Digital Opticals PAT CLANCEY
Produced in Association with MANIGOT PRODUCTIONS THE FILMMAKERS WISH TO THANK THE FOLLOWING FOR THEIR ASSISTANCE MIKE MILLS ZACH COWIE THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND THE CALIFORNIA FILM COMMISSION RIVERSIDE CITY COLLEGE MARCHING BAND LOS ANGELES MEMORIAL COLISEUM AND SPORTS ARENA MARK LEWIS – SUNKIST BUILDING PRODUCTION STAGE FACILITIES – 20TH CENTURY FOX NRG PARK/HOUSTON ASTRODOME Footage provided by ABC Sports. All Rights Reserved. CBS Logo – Courtesy of CBS Broadcasting, Inc. Footage courtesy of AP ARCHIVE Footage courtesy of ABCNews VideoSource Footage from “THE MARY TYLER MOORE SHOW” courtesy of Twentieth Century Fox Television. All Rights Reserved. Footage provided by FILM ARCHIVES, INC. Footage of KOJAK courtesy of Universal Studios License, LLC. Footage from MOTHER’S DAY MASSACRE courtesy of CBS Sports Footage provided by Shutterstock Footage provided by Wazee Digital Footage provided by ITN and USTA Footage provided by Getty Images
What stage of the production process are you currently in? How have the work sessions been going overall? What has been your best example of creative problem-solving thus far? Have you been able to apply something you have learned about or ? Have you made any attempts to replicate techniques you observed from the films you have studied? In what ways have you been able to demonstrate excellence in the use of ? What has been the biggest hurdle towards making good progress on the film? Is the film emerging in the way it was originally envisioned? How have you been able to overcome technical limitations in terms of equipment? How have you been able to improvise when your technical know-how has been deficient? What aspects need to be fixed? What will you be able to do to improve the film before the next production meeting? What specific areas do you want feedback on? Do not feel like you need to answer all of these questions. However, this list should provide ample material from which you can craft a usable reflection. The answers to these questions will also, not coincidentally, be the kinds of remarks a future examiner would be interested to read as he or she assesses your work. Assessment Advice Even though the Production Portfolio is an internal assessment (scored and marked by your instructor), it is also moderated by the IB. This means your instructor is required to send in a sample of his or her marks to the IB, to determine if the marks are fair and consistent. Always keep in mind your portfolio might be reviewed by a total stranger, so write it with that in mind. Explain everything you did and why you did it, without assuming the person reading your work "already knows the whole story behind everything that happened." Upload Assignment Head over to the to submit your assignment for this lesson.
1.4 Current rates of investment are likely to be driven partly by cyclical factors. However, industry structural change toward (less capital intensive) services industries, weak growth in demand (and with this little pressure on output prices), changes in the investment choices of businesses themselves, and enduring perceptions of risk from the GFC are also likely to be affecting the rates of measured capital investment. Thus, while rates of investment should ultimately adjust somewhat and help support output and LP growth, the adjustment period may continue for some time. The impact of structural change on productivity Structural change, or the change in industry composition over time, can affect productivity growth, depending on the distribution of resources in the economy and the level of productivity in each industry. As noted above, Australia has seen a longterm shift of economic activity toward more labourintensive service sectors, which on average have a lower level of productivity (figure 8). With the end of the investment boom in mining, labour has begun shifting back to industries that have lower levels of productivity. This compositional change towards more labourintensive industries is likely to reduce LP growth during the adjustment period. Looking longer term, shifts in industry composition are a major factor influencing the Commission’s current modelling reference case, which projects that the contribution from aggregate LP to real GDP growth to 205960 will be lower, at 1.3 percentage points on average, than the historical average from 197475 to 201314 of 1.7 percentage points (Gabbitas and Salma 2016).
—— 2017, ‘Income inequality exists in Australia, but the true picture may not be as bad as you thought’, The Conversation, 20 June. World Bank 2014, Purchasing Power Parities and the Real Size of World Economies, A Comprehensive Report of the 2011 International Comparison Program, Washington, DC, 20 November.
This strategy funds a number of programs. Landing pads Landing pads provide marketready startups with a shortterm (90 day) operational base where they can access entrepreneurial talent, mentors, investors and a wider connected network of innovation hubs in global innovation hotspots — Berlin, San Francisco, Shanghai, Singapore and Tel Aviv. Global Connections Fund The Global Connections Fund supports global SMEtoresearcher collaborations to enable viable projects to grow and test commercialisation in industries of strategic growth in Australia. The fund consists of two types of grants: Bridging Grants — larger grants of up to $50 000 designed as seed funding capital to enable viable projects to grow in scope and scale, test commercialisation and proofofconcept activities Priming Grants — small grants of around $7000 to enable Australian SMEs and Australian researchers to meet and collaborate with international partners to further develop their ideas. The grants are administered by the Australian Academy of Technology and Engineering. Global Innovation Linkages programme The programme supports groups (or consortia) of Australian industry and research organisations with grants of up to $1 million over a maximum period of four years, to engage with international partners in key economies to undertake research and development projects. Regional Collaborations Programme This programme, administered by the Australian Academy of Science, aims to deliver solutions to shared regional challenges in the AsiaPacific region through multipartner research and collaboration activities.
Box 2 UK Digital Service Standard Understand user needs — develop a deep knowledge of who the service users are and what that means for the design of the service Ongoing user research — plan for ongoing user research and usability testing to continuously improve the service Have a multidisciplinary team — with the skills to design, build and operate the service, with oversight by suitably skilled managers with decision making responsibility Use agile methods — build your service using iterative and usercentred methods Iterate and improve frequently — build your service so it can be iterated and improved on a frequent basis and make sure that you have the capacity, resources and technical flexibility to do so Evaluate tools and systems — to choose tools and systems that will be used to build, host, operate and measure the service, and how to procure them Understand security and privacy issues — evaluate what user data and information the digital service will be providing or storing and address the security level, legal responsibility, privacy issues and risks associated with the service (consulting with experts where appropriate) Make all new source code open and reusable — publish it under appropriate licences (or provide a convincing explanation as to why this can’t be done for specific subsets of the source code) Use open standards and common platforms where available — including GOV.UK Verify as an option for identity assurance Test the endtoend service — in an environment identical to that of the live version, including on all common browsers and devices, and using dummy accounts and a representative sample of users Make a plan for being offline — to manage the event of the digital service being taken temporarily offline Make sure users succeed first time — create a service that is simple to use and intuitive enough that users succeed the first time Make the user experience consistent with GOV.UK — build a service consistent with the user experience of the rest of GOV.UK including using the design patterns and style guide Measure and report on performance — collect and analyse performance data to guide continuous improvement, identify key performance indicators, including the key four ones, and report on this data Test with the minister – test the service from beginning to end with the minister responsible for it. Source: UK Government (2017).
Winterford, B. 2011, $45k Stolen in Phone Porting Scam, iTnews, www.itnews.com.au/news/45kstoleninphoneportingscam282310 (accessed 17 May 2017).
Frankel, J. 2011, A solution to fiscal procyclicality: The structural budget institutions pioneered by Chile, Working Paper, 16945, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. Daley, J. 2015, ‘Intergenerational Report: Joe Hockey and the Deathly Budget Hallows’, The Conversation, 5 March. Gruen, N. 2016, ‘Why we accept travesties of “evidencebased” policymaking’, The Mandarin, 9 May. Hunt, G. 2016, Final Update on the Government’s response to the Royal Commission into the Home Insulation Program, Statement. Koptis, G. 2011, ‘Independent Fiscal Institutions: Developing Good Practices’, OECD Journal on Budgeting, vol. 2011/3. Lowe, P. 2014, Demographics, Productivity and Innovation. Speech to the Sydney Institute, Reserve Bank of Australia. Mackay, K. 2011, ‘The Performance Framework of the Australian Government, 1987 to 2011’, OECD Journal of Budgeting, vol. 2011/3, pp. 1–51. McKinsey & Company 2017, Government Productivity: Unlocking the $3.5 Trillion Opportunity, McKinsey Centre for Government. Morrison, S. 2017, Enhancing transparency in Budget spending, Media Release, Canberra. Murphy, C. 2016, Efficiency of the tax system: a marginal excess burden analysis, June, TTPI Working Paper 4/2016, ANU. NSW Government (NSW Government Department of Premier and Cabinet) 2016, NSW Government Program Evaluation Guidelines, Sydney. NSW PSC (New South Wales Public Service Commission) 2016, Leadership Matters: State of the NSW Public Sector Report 2016, Sydney. OECD 2014, Database on Digital Government Performance. —— 2012, OECD Economic Surveys: Australia 2012, December, Paris. Pallas, T. (Treasurer) 2016, Labor to Establish Parliamentary Budget Officer, Media Release, 29 February. PBO (Parliamentary Budget Office) 2016, National Fiscal Outlook As at 201617 Budgets, 03/2016. PC (Productivity Commission) 2012, Regulation Impact Analysis: Benchmarking, Research Report. Pearson, E. 2015, Actuaries Institute Letter to the Treasurer: 2015 Intergenerational Report, Letter, May. Potter, B. 2017, ‘It’s time to strip Treasury of forecasting: Bob Gregory’, Australian Financial Review, 30 May.
that the reporting and measurement requirements of some social impact bonds are preventing takeup and hindering their benefits (Edmiston and Nicholls 2017). Overcoming information gaps In conventional (reasonably competitive) markets, prices often convey quality. However, such price signals are typically not present for many governmentfunded services as they are either provided free of charge or heavily subsidised. Equally, there is no equivalent in most government services of ‘warranties’, which, in the commercial sphere provide signals about the qualities of services. This creates a greater imperative for information provision to consumers that provides them with some understanding of the variation in the quality of providers/services. Consumers can express their satisfaction or dissatisfaction with services formally (such as through complaint lines) and informally (such as through online forums), but these may not be representative of all users’ views or provide clear or very useful information. Provision of meaningful information that genuinely gives consumers some agency is nontrivial. This reflects that many governments services have effects that take years to surface (for example, there is considerable uncertainty about future earnings and employment prospects from different types of education) or involve complex technical matters (for instance, in making choices between various clinical procedures). As such, wellcurated comparative information is needed, although, as discussed below, governments need not always themselves provide the curation service. Examples of existing performance reporting The Productivity Commission undertakes annual comparative performance reporting of many government services — on behalf of the Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision (SCRGSP) — through the Report on Government Services (ROGS). These reports include performance indicators for services funded by the Commonwealth, States and Territories (such as emergency management, health, justice, community services, education and housing and homelessness) and measure their equity, effectiveness and efficiency across different states and territories (SCRGSP 2017). Commonwealth, State and Territory governments have also progressed a range of different platforms for reporting and comparing the performance of different governmentfunded service providers (box 2).
LomaxSmith, J., Watson, L. and Webster, B. 2011, Higher education base funding review: Final report, October. Marginson, S. 2009, ‘The limits of market reform in higher education’. —— 2015, ‘Is Australia overdependent on international students?’, International Higher Education, vol. 54. McMillan, J. 2011, Student retention : current evidence and insights for improvement, #10, Australian Council for Educational Research. Moodie, G. 2014, Civilisation as we don’t know it: teachingonly universities, The Conversation, 30 June. Nardelli, M. 2017, Survey shows we need to more ways to support Year 12s, 23 February, University of South Australia. National Commission of Audit 2014, Towards Responsible Government, February. Nelson, P. 1970, ‘Information and Consumer Behavior’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 311–329. Nguyen, L. and Oliver, J. 2013, The Australian Consumer Law – another compliance obligation for universities?, 8 May, MinterEllison. Norton, A. 2012, Graduate Winners: Assessing the public and private benefits of higher education, August, Grattan Institute. —— and Cherastidtham, I. 2014, Doubtful debt: the rising cost of student loans, April, Grattan Institute. —— and —— 2015a, The cash nexus: how teaching funds research in Australian universities, November, Grattan Institute. —— and —— 2015b, University fees: what students pay in deregulated markets, August, Grattan Institute. —— and —— 2016a, HELP for the future: fairer repayment of student debt, March, Grattan Institute. —— and —— 2016b, Shared interest: a universal loan fee for HELP, December, Grattan Institute. NSW ICAC (NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption) 2015, Learning the hard way: managing corruption risks associated with international students at universities in NSW, April. OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) 2013, Getting the right data: the assessment instruments for the AHELO feasibility study, (accessed 27 July 2017). —— 2016, Education at a Glance 2016: OECD Indicators, September, Paris.
Figure A.1 Employment rates have been rising for females Change in employment rates (percentage points)a a The employment rate is the ratio of employment to the civilian population in each age group. Source: ABS 2017, Labour Force, Australia, Detailed Dec 2016, Cat. no. 6291.0.55.001, 24 January.
Value Analysis Value Engineering Applies to an existing product Applies to the product at design stage All factors involve in Value Analysis, like, workers, engineers, sales person, etc, with their experience and knowledge Done by the product design team It may change the present stage of product or operation Changes are made before product reaches the production stage. It is achieved mostly with the help of general knowledge and experience It requires specific technical knowledge.
OASIS ITEM - Reporting Algorithm for M1313 CURRENT STAGE at Discharge Look back to most recent SOC/ROC PRIOR STAGE at most recent SOC/ROC REPORT AS NEW OR WORSENED? a. Stage 2 at Discharge If same pressure ulcer at most recent SOC/ROC was: Not present Stage 1 Covered with a dressing/device, then documented as a Stage 1 at any home visit or assessment(s) YES Stage 2 NO Stage 3 Stage 4 NA (Stage 3 or 4 could not become a Stage 2) Covered with a non-removable dressing/device and remains Unstageable until assessed as a Stage 2 at Discharge NO b. Stage 3 at Discharge If same pressure ulcer at most recent SOC/ROC was: Not present Stage 1 Stage 2 Unstageable with documented Stage 1 and/or 2 at any home visit or Follow-Up assessment(s) YES Stage 3 NO Stage 4 NA (Stage 4 could not become a Stage 3) Unstageable until assessed as a Stage 3 at Discharge NO c. Stage 4 at Discharge If same pressure ulcer at most recent SOC/ROC was: Not present Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Unstageable with documented Stage 1, 2, and/or 3 at any home visit or Follow-Up assessment(s) YES Stage 4 Unstageable until assessed as a Stage 4 at Discharge NO d. Unstageable due to non- removable dressing at Discharge If same pressure ulcer at most recent SOC/ROC was: Not present YES Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Unstageable NO e. Unstageable due to slough and/or eschar at Discharge If same pressure ulcer at most recent SOC/ROC was: Not present Stage 1 Stage 2 YES Stage3 Stage 4 Unstageable NO f. Unstageable – suspected deep tissue injury at Discharge If same pressure ulcer at most recent SOC/ROC was: Not present Stage 1 Stage 2 YES Stage 3 Stage 4 Unstageable due to slough and/or eschar NA (Full thickness pressure ulcer could not become a DTI) Unstageable – Suspected DTI or due to a non-removable dressing/device NO
Rates Fringes LABORER GROUP 1.....................$ 22.23 11.49 GROUP 2.....................$ 25.48 11.49 GROUP 3.....................$ 27.89 11.49 GROUP 4.....................$ 28.56 11.49 GROUP 5.....................$ 29.04 11.49 BASE POINTS: BELLINGHAM, MT. VERNON, EVERETT, SEATTLE, KENT, TACOMA, OLYMPIA, CENTRALIA, ABERDEEN, SHELTON, PT. TOWNSEND, PT. ANGELES, AND BREMERTON ZONE 1 - Projects within 25 radius miles of the respective city hall ZONE 2 - More than 25 but less than 45 radius miles from the respective city hall ZONE 3 - More than 45 radius miles from the respective city hall ZONE DIFFERENTIAL (ADD TO ZONE 1 RATES): ZONE 2 - $1.00 ZONE 3 - $1.30 BASE POINTS: CHELAN, SUNNYSIDE, WENATCHEE, AND YAKIMA ZONE 1 - Projects within 25 radius miles of the respective city hall ZONE 2 - More than 25 radius miles from the respective city hall ZONE DIFFERENTIAL (ADD TO ZONE 1 RATES): ZONE 2 - $2.25 LABORERS CLASSIFICATIONS GROUP 1: Landscaping and Planting; Watchman; Window Washer/Cleaner (detail clean-up, such as but not limited to cleaning floors, ceilings, walls, windows, etc., prior to final acceptance by the owner) GROUP 2: Batch Weighman; Crusher Feeder; Fence Laborer; Flagman; Pilot Car GROUP 3: General Laborer; Air, Gas, or Electric Vibrating Screed; Asbestos Abatement Laborer; Ballast Regulator Machine; Brush Cutter; Brush Hog Feeder; Burner; Carpenter Tender; Cement Finisher Tender; Change House or Dry Shack; Chipping Gun (under 30 lbs.); Choker Setter; Chuck Tender; Clean-up Laborer; Concrete Form Stripper; Curing Laborer; Demolition (wrecking and moving including charred material); Ditch Digger; Dump Person; Fine Graders;
3. The Green economy research and innovation Award – contribution by an individual or an organisation towards achieving biodiversity conservation, environmental sustainability and a greener economy over the last 5 to 10 years Part 6: Nominations in other categories (Indicate below whether you intend to nominate the candidate, whether as an individual or member/s of a team, or an organisation in an additional category ) Yes/No If Yes, indicate the relevant category in the following table by number Note that a separate Nomination form must be completed for each additional category except for the Annual Theme award. Any original nomination form will suffice for the Annual Theme Award. A further Nomination form should cross-refer to the principal Nomination form and should provide only the differences NSTF Categories Categories – Full title: All the awards are “For an outstanding contribution to science, engineering and technology (SET) and Innovation…” (The complete title of each award starts with this wording in place of “contribution”.) Working title: Other categories in which the individual/ team members will be nominated 1. 1a. -Contribution over a lifetime (15 years or more) Lifetime award 1b. TW Kambule-NSTF Awards: Researcher - contribution through research and its outputs over a period from 6 years up to 15 years of research work from the commencement of the research career, predominantly in South Africa Researcher award 1c. TW Kambule-NSTF Awards: Emerging Researcher - contribution through research and its outputs over a period of up to 6 years of research work from the commencement of the research career, predominantly in South Africa Emerging researcher award 1d. Management Award – contribution through management and related SET and innovation activities over the last 5 to 10 years in South Africa Management and related activities award 2. Engineering Research Capacity Development Awards – contribution by an individual over the last 5 to 10 years Engineering Research Capacity Development Awards 3. The Green economy research and innovation Award – contribution by an individual or an organisation towards achieving biodiversity conservation, environmental sustainability and a greener economy over the last 5 to 10 years Green economy Award 4. NSTF- Water Research Commission Award - contribution by an individual or an organisation to SET in South Africa towards sustainable water management, knowledge generation and solutions over the last 5 to 10 years NSTF-WRC Award 5. Data for Research Award - contribution by an individual or a team for advancing the availability, management and use of data for research Data for Research Award 6. Innovation Awards
Title and Full Name Current position/s and name of applicable institution/ employer Address Telephone number Cell number E-mail Website (if applicable) Seconder (The details required below are those of the person seconding the nomination) Title and Full Name Current position/s and name of applicable institution/ employer Address Telephone number Cell number E-mail Website (if applicable) Part 3: Not required Part 4: Communications Officer (The details required below are those of the person responsible for communications with the media at the NGO. Details only required where they are not the same as for the NGO) Title and Full Name Physical address Telephone number Cell number E-mail Website (if applicable) Part 5: Specific category in which this nomination is being made (Indicate, in the block on the right below the category in which you are nominating the candidate by number) 8. Award for a Non-Governmental Organisation –contribution to SET by an NGO including innovation, technology transfer and education and training activities over the last 5 to 10 years. Part 6: Nominations in other categories Indicate whether a nomination of any of the team members in another category is to be made. Yes/No If Yes, indicate the relevant category in the following table by number below.
Have you or other members of the team been a winner in any NSTF or NSTF-BHP Billiton Awards or NSTF-South32 Awards category before? Yes/No If Yes, in what year/s and in which category? Please confirm that the contribution for which you are being nominated in this nomination covers new work which was not recognised by a previous NSTF or NSTF-BHP Billiton Award or NSTF-South32 Award to you or any other members of the team. Where appropriate please provide an explanatory note. ----------------------- So confirmed Nominee’s Signature
Project manager (primary contact) Title Click here to insert text Name Click here to insert text Organisation Click here to insert text Email Click here to insert text Phone Click here to insert text Role in project Click here to insert text Secondary contact Title Click here to insert text Name Click here to insert text Organisation Click here to insert text Email Click here to insert text Phone Click here to insert text Role in project Click here to insert text Administrator (if different from above) Name of organisation Click here to insert text ABN Click here to insert text Postal address Click here to insert text Street address Click here to insert text Suburb Click here to insert text Postcode Click here to insert text Local government area Click here to insert text State electorate Click here to insert text Website address Click here to insert text Registered for GST? Yes/No
Criterion 3: Value for money How much funding are you seeking from the EPA? Grants of between $30,000 and $300,000 are available. For more details see Guidelines for applicants. Years Funds ex GST 2017-2018 $ 2018-2019 $ 2019-2020 $ 2020-2021 $ TOTAL $ Project Budget. Provide a detailed project budget as ‘Attachment B’ to this application, using the Excel Budget form provided. Summarise the key activities budget here (i.e. a list of the total project unit costs and the funding you are seeking for each from the EPA). Include details of all complementary resourcing (cash or in-kind); this adds value for money for your project. Project Item EPA Contribution $ In-kind ($ equivalent) Funding from other sources. List any other grants that you (the applicant, partners and listed in this application) have/will receive relating to the activities proposed in this project. Note: Work that would have been undertaken as part of agreed commitments or existing programs or business activities is not eligible for funding. Funding/payment source Agency providing the funding/ payment Amount of funding/payment Describe the relationship to this project
Yes No If you answered ‘Yes’ to this question, please provide details of previous licence/permit(s): Licence/permit number: State: 4. Qualifications An applicant must submit evidence that they are currently enrolled in an approved course of training for either PMT or FUM work. (or both, if applying for Training Permit for both categories). You must provide a letter from your employer or training organisation to confirm you are enrolled in a relevant course. Registered training organisation: Name of course: Supervisor contact details: 5. Application fee An application fee of $118 applies for a Training Permit. The EPA will not issue the permit until the fee has been received. 6. Applicant’s declaration I declare and understand that: Tick box: I am 17 years of age or older I have provided photo ID evidence to this effect The information supplied in this application is true and not false or misleading I consent to the making of inquiries and the exchange of information with authorities in any relevant state or territory regarding my activities in the occupation relevant to this licence application.
samples, which incorporates any changes made as a result of the final line review, will be produced for this meeting. During the preceding steps, Deckers creates a spec sheet for the proposed shoe. The spec sheets include: drawings of the product, the materials to be used for each component of the proposed shoe, the color scheme, the intended season for the product (spring/summer or fall/winter), and the product design team members involved. Spec sheets will specify information such as the type of material to be used for stitching, along with the number of stitches per inch. Precise information as to each component of the shoe is imperative so that an accurate cost breakdown of the shoe can be computed. The spec sheets also typically state the vendor from whom the materials are to be acquired. All of these steps culminate in the creation of a tech pack. A tech pack is a multi-page document created by Deckers containing detailed information about the footwear item to which it relates, including drawings, materials, precise measurements of the features, and colors. A sample tech pack entered into the record as Exhibit 52 shows that the front page of a tech pack consists of a “designer check list,” and the items on that list that must be completed are: line art of the individual shoe (left lateral view); line art of all relevant different views; technical line art of hardware/software molded components, to
Time Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday 9:30 – 10 Caitlin Leslie Kat Caitlin Leslie 10 – 10:30 Sandi Caitlin Leslie Kat Sandi Caitlin Leslie Sandi Kat 10:30 – 11 Sandi Caitlin Leslie Kat Sandi Caitlin Leslie Sandi Kat 11 – 11:30 Jon Alexa Jon Alexa Jon 11:30 – 12 Sherri Jon Alexa Sherri Jon Alexa Jon Brooke 12 – 12:30 Sherri Brooke Alexa Ashley Sherri Alexa Ashley Brooke 12:30 – 1 Brooke Alexa Ashley Sherri Alexa Ashley Brooke 1 – 1:30 Matt Delainey Jennica Matt Jennica Ashley Brooke 1:30 – 2 Matt Delainey Jennica Matt Jennica Ashley Delainey 2 – 2:30 Matt Delainey Jennica Matt Tyler Jennica Tyler Delainey 2:30 – 3 Delainey Tyler Tyler Delainey 3:30 – 4 Tyler Tyler 4 – 4:30 4:30 - 5 Stats: Everyone but Jon, Kat, Alexa 105: Leslie, Sandi, Sherri, Kat, Alexa
TABLE OF CONTENTS Part I Scope of Services, Contract Performance, Budget, Reports, Program-Specific and Agency-Specific Sections Part II Terms and Conditions A. Definitions 1. Bid 2. Breach 3. Cancellation 4. Claims 5. Client 6. Contract 7. Contractor Parties 8. Data 9. Expiration 10. Force Majeure 11. Confidential Information (formerly Personal Information) 12. Confidential Information Breach (formerly Personal Information Breach) 13. Records 14. Services 15. State 16. Termination B. Client-Related Safeguards 1. Safeguarding Client Information 2. Reporting of Client Abuse or Neglect 3. Background Checks C. Contractor Obligations 1. Cost Standards 2. Credits and Rights in Data 3. Organizational Information, Conflict of Interest, Form 990 4. Federal Funds 5. Audit and Inspection of Plant, Places of Business and Records 6. Related Party Transactions 7. Suspension or Debarment 8. Liaison 9. Subcontracts 10. Independent Capacity of Contractor C. Contractor Obligations cont’d 11. Indemnification 12. Insurance 13. Sovereign Immunity 14. Choice of Law/Choice of Forum, Settlement of Disputes, Claims Against the State 15. Compliance with Law and Policy, Facility Standards and Licensing 16. Representations and Warranties 17. Reports 18. Delinquent Reports 19. Protection of Confidential Information 20. Workforce Analysis 21. Litigation D. Changes To The Contract, Termination, Cancellation and Expiration 1. Contract Amendment 2. Contractor Changes and Assignment 3. Breach 4. Non-enforcement Not to Constitute Waiver 5. Suspension 6. Ending the Contractual Relationship 7. Transition after Termination or Expiration of Contract E. Statutory and Regulatory Compliance 1. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 2. Americans with Disabilities Act 3. Utilization of Minority Business Enterprises 4. Priority Hiring 5. Non-discrimination 6. Freedom of Information 7. Whistleblowing 8. Executive Orders 9. Campaign Contribution Restriction
State Swimming Competitors List All competitor lists must arrive by FAX or to the IHSAA no later than 12 Noon, Tuesday, February 6, 2018. Type listing in alphabetical order. School Name___________________ School Nickname _________________ 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. Head Coach Assistant Coach/Support Staff This list must arrive by E-MAIL or FAX at no later than 12 Noon, Tuesday, February 6. If it is not received by that time, a long delay in processing upon arrival at the State Meet may result. STATE SWIMMING COMPETITORS LIST OCTOBER Iowa High School Athletic Association Jared Chizek Email: Fax: (515) 432-2961
Sample Substance Abuse Council Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings Year ended June 30, 2018 Comment Reference Comment Title Status If not corrected, provide reason for finding’s recurrence and planned corrective action or other explanation 2015-001 2016-001 2017-001 Minority Business Enterprise/ Women Business Enterprise (MBE/WBE) No longer valid; does not warrant further action. Over two years have passed since the reporting of this audit finding. The Grantor Agency has not followed up on this finding, nor has a management decision been issued on its part. II-A-16 2016-002 II-A-17 2017-002 Segregation of Duties over Federal Revenues Not corrected. Limited staff resulting from staff turnover. Plan to segregate duties for custody, recordkeeping and reconciling among staff when positions are filled. II-B-16 II-B-17 Capital Assets Corrective action taken. 2017-003 Financial Reporting Partially corrected. Time was necessary to develop and implement review procedures. Timely report filing will begin with the quarter ending December 2018. In accordance with Uniform Guidance Section 200.511(a), the Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings must also include findings relating to the financial statements which are required to be reported in accordance with Government Auditing Standards.
Condition - Material amounts of receivables, payables and capital asset additions were not recorded in the Council’s financial statements. Adjustments were subsequently made by the Council to properly include these amounts in the financial statements. Cause – Council policies do not require and procedures have not been established to require independent review of year end cut-off transactions to ensure the Council’s financial statements are accurate and reliable. Effect – Lack of policies and procedures resulted in Council employees not detecting the errors in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. As a result, material adjustments to the Council’s financial statements were necessary. Recommendation – The Council should implement procedures to ensure all receivables, payables and capital asset additions are identified and included in the Council’s financial statements. Response – We will double check these in the future to avoid missing any receivables, payables or capital asset transactions. Conclusion – Response accepted. INSTANCES OF NON-COMPLIANCE: No matters were noted. Part III: Findings and Questioned Costs For Federal Awards: INSTANCES OF NON-COMPLIANCE: No matters were noted. INTERNAL CONTROL DEFICIENCIES: CFDA Number 93.959: Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse Pass-through Entity Identifying Numbers: 5887CT005 and 5888CPO49 Federal Award Year: 2017 and 2018 Prior Year Finding Number: III-A-17 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed through the Iowa Department of Public Health III-A-18 (2018-001) Segregation of Duties – The Council did not properly segregate custody, record-keeping and reconciling functions for revenues, including those related to its federal program. See II-A-18. Part IV: Other Findings Related to Required Statutory Reporting: No matters were noted.
Pharmacy Address Telephone Whether delivers, where to Delivery days Lloyds Pharmacy 2-3 The Square, Holsworthy, EX22 6DL 01409 253461 Does not deliver (but special delivery arrangements will be made for patients using dosette boxes prepared by this pharmacy) – Boots Pharmacy Holsworthy Medical Centre, Dobles Lane, Holsworthy, EX22 6GH 01409 255295 * Most areas between Holsworthy, Shebbear, Hatherleigh, Winkleigh and Okehampton. Not areas near Torrington. Every weekday Boots Pharmacy 27-28 Fore Street, Okehampton, EX20 1HB 01837 54322 Mon, Wed, Fri mornings only Lloyds Pharmacy 31-32 Fore Street, Okehampton, EX20 1HB 01837 52153 Any location Every weekday Lloyds Pharmacy 1 High Street, Torrington, EX38 8HN 01805 622174 Does not deliver – North Tawton Pharmacy The Old Bank, The Square, North Tawton, EX20 2AY 01837 82824 * Exbourne, Folly Gate, Sampford Courtney, Sticklepath, South Zeal, Inwardleigh, Belstone, Jacobstowe Tuesday * Bondleigh, Broadwoodkelly, Chawleigh, Dolton, Hatherleigh, Iddesleigh, Monkokehampton, Wembworthy, Winkleigh, Hollocombe, Ashreigney Thursday * If where you live is not listed please contact the pharmacy to check.
Kingdom (England) The writings of Mary Wollstonecraft and others in the 18th century inspired women later in history to fight for equal rights. Women led campaigns to improve education for girls, child custody and property rights, career options for women, and the right to vote (suffrage). information and sources about Women’s rights movements in the 18th and 19th centuries. The Abolition Movement Starts in England
Penalties All penalties will be called by the referee. Defense: Offsides 5 yards and automatic first down Interference 10 yards and automatic first down Illegal contact (holding, blocking, etc.) 10 yards and automatic first down Illegal flag pull (before receiver has ball) 10 yards and automatic first down Illegal rushing (starting rush from inside 7-yard marker) 10 yards and automatic first down Offense: Illegal motion (more than one person moving, false start, etc.) 5 yards and loss of down Illegal forward pass (pass received behind line of scrimmage) 5 yards and loss of down Offensive pass interference (illegal pick play, pushing off/away defender) 10 yards and loss of down Flag guarding 10 yards (from line of scrimmage) and loss of down Delay of game Clock stops, 10 yards and loss of down
should be made to skills.bursaries@southtyneside.gov.uk. I confirm I have read the ‘Bursary Fund - Information for Students’ which can be read at Applicant Signature Date FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Assessment and Approval 2018/19 Student Details Student Name DOB Assistance Requested Assistance Granted Amount Vulnerable Bursary In receipt of Income Support or Universal Credit and financially supporting themselves or someone else Care Leavers or young people who are looked after children, or unaccompanied asylum seekers In receipt of Disability Living Allowance(DLA) or Personal Independence Payment(PIP) and either Employment Support Allowance(ESA) or Universal Credit(UC) Discretionary Bursary Facing financial barriers to participation in further education. Agreed standards of behaviour and attendance should be met. Free Meals Young people who qualify under the Guidance Rules and whose household is in receipt of one of the benefits criteria listed. Comments Signatories Signature Date Name Signatories Signature Date Name
3. Team Matrix Firm Information Team Member Information Team Member Projects Experience and Role Additional Team Member Projects Staff Name and Registration /Credential Project Discipline / Role For This Project (see keys, Instructions for Filing) Years with Current Firm / Years with Other Firms 1. Section 4 Title, Cost, Size, Year 2. Section 5 Title, Cost, Size, Year 3. Section 5 Title, Cost, Size, Year 4. Section 5 Title, Cost, Size, Year 5. Section 5 Title, Cost, Size Year Add’l Project Title, Cost, Size, Year Add’l Project Title , Cost, Size, Year Add’l Project Title, Cost, Size, Year Add’l Project Title, Cost, Size, Year Firm Name City, State MBE/DVB Firm Name City, State MBE/DVB Firm Name City, State MBE/DVB Firm Name City, State MBE/DVB Firm Name City, State MBE/DVB Firm Name City, State MBE/DVB Firm Name City, State
MBE/DVB 3. Team Matrix (Cont.) Firm Information Team Member Information Team Member Projects Experience and Role Additional Team Member Projects Staff Name and Registration /Credential Project Discipline / Role For This Project (see keys, for Filing) Years with Current Firm / Years with Other Firms 1. Section 4 Title, Cost, Size, Year 2. Section 5 Title, Cost, Size, Year 3. Section 5 Title, Cost, Size, Year 4. Section 5 Title, Cost, Size Year 5. Section 5 Title Cost, Size, Year Add’l Project Title, Cost, Size, Year Add’l Project Title , Cost, Size, Year Add’l Project Title, Cost, Size, Year Add’l Project Title, Cost, Size, Year Firm Name City, State MBE/DVB Firm Name City, State MBE/DVB Firm Name City, State MBE/DVB Firm Name City, State MBE/DVB See page 14 of this document for Project Disciplines and Roles. 4. Qualifying Project Readiness Center of $7.6 million or 26,500 GSF
6. Additional Team Related Experience Use this space to provide any additional information or description of resources supporting your firm’s qualifications for the proposed project. 7. Association Responsibilities If applicable, provide very specific details, including a graphic representation by phase of project, of the association roles and responsibilities and management of the project. Identify the primary Principals for the Project. 8. Registration Requirements List the names and registration numbers of two principals and/or other responsible members of the Prime firm: Name: Registration #: Name: Registration #: 9. Statement of Facts Our firm, members of our firm, or the firm in association with one or more firms has substantially completed the Quality Project in Section 4 of this qualification that meets the eligibility requirements of Administrative code, Chapter 20.02(6) (d) as referenced in the instructions. Furthermore, I have validated the completeness and accuracy of the information provided by our team and I am responsible for the quality checks for any errors and omissions in the submittal. Yes Name: Title: Signature: Date:
Table 2: UPDRS, PDQ-39, and LEU at baseline and after 6 months of LCIG therapy Baseline 6 months Change p-values UPDRS II, off 28.1 21.4 -24% <0.01 UPDRS II, on 10.4 4.9 -53% <0.01 UPDRS III, off 50.1 42.1 -16% 0.058 UPDRS III, on 21.7 11.6 -47% <0.05 UPDRS total, on 49.6 23.8 -53% <0.01 PDQ-39 70.6 35.4 -50% <0.05 LEU, mg/day 1,307 2,256 +73% <0.05 Data are expressed as mean. The change is in percent of the mean. UPDRS, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale; PDQ-39, Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire-39; LEU, Levodopa Equivalent Unit.
NOTE: The references to “A,” “B,” and “C” in the charts below refer to the definitions of the 2018 first-year class found at the beginning of Part II. LAW SCHOOLS THAT DO NOT HAVE A PART-TIME DIVISION OR PROGRAM APPROVED BY THE COUNCIL Number of applicants who submitted completed applications to begin law school during the period October 6, 2017 to October 5, 2018. Number of offers from applicant pool 2018 first- year class (A): Number of enrollees from the applicant pool 2018 first- year class (B and C): Number of deferred and previously admitted students 2018 first-year class Total enrollees (A, B, and C): Number of enrollees from the applicant pool plus any deferred and previously admitted students M F O M F O M F O M F O M F O Ethnicity ” “ “ “ LAW SCHOOLS THAT HAVE A PART-TIME DIVISION OR PROGRAM APPROVED BY THE COUNCIL Un-duplicated number of applicants who submitted completed applications to begin law school during the period October 6, 2017 to October 5, 2018. Un- duplicated Number of offers from applicant pool 2018 first- year class (A): Un- duplicated Number of enrollees from the applicant pool 2018 first- year class (B and C): Un- duplicated number of deferred and previously admitted students 2018 first-year class Total enrollees (A, B, and C): Number of enrollees from the applicant pool plus any deferred and previously admitted students) FT PT M F O M F O M F O M F O M F O M F O Ethnicity ” “ “ “ READMITTED STUDENTS 3. Indicate the number of students who were readmitted and enrolled after being disqualified from the Law School.
J.D. Enrollment Non-J.D. Enrollment Is this course part of the required first one-third of a student’s coursework Yes/No Distance Education Course Yes/No Level First-Year Upper Level Course Type Classroom Seminar Co-curricular (e.g., law review, moot court) Experiential Courses Clinic Total number of seats available Simulation Total number of seats available Field Placement Total number of seats filled PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS AND ADMINISTRATORS Indicate the number of professional librarians and administrators in the 2017-2018 academic year. Librarians are those individuals doing work that requires professional education (a J.D. degree or a master’s degree in library or information science, or the equivalent). Administrators include those with the rank of Associate Dean, Assistant Dean, or Director. 4. Librarians Full Time Part Time Administrators Full Time Part Time