Output 2: To strengthen the capacity of key national anti-corruption institutions and non-state actors to more effectively tackle corruption with resultant improvements in service delivery Baseline: Only has an ICAC Existing AC institutions (auditors, Ombudsman, LC,) function variably Parliamentary committees undertake variable oversight of Govt Participation of CSOs in public accountability mechanisms vary Outcome Indicators AC institutions reviewed/strength in at least 3 PICs Enhanced role of CSOs in the at least 6 PICs 2012 AC work supported with 1 parliaments Support provided to a least 1 ICAC, if established Social accountability pilots in 2 PICs (at least one incorp. gender) Media training on AC 2013 AC work supported with 2 parliaments Social accountability pilots in 2 PICs (at lest one incorporating gender) Support provided to proposed PNG ICAC 2014 AC work supported with 2 parliaments Social accountability pilots in 2 PICs (at lest one incorporating gender) Support provided to a least 1 ICAC, if established Media training on AC 2015 AC work supported with 2 parliaments Social accountability Activity Result 2.2: Capacity development of key integrity institutions Actions: Support to countries to explore AC institutional strengthening reform options Capacity assessments undertaken of key AC institutions (incl new ICACs) + capacity development plans designed/implemented Training provided to key AC institutions on investigation + prosecution + asset recovery + proceeds of crime + MLA Regional workshop on improving integrity in the justice system conducted UNODC UNDP 200,000 400,000 Activity Result 2.3: Non-state actors undertake effective AC advocacy and monitoring Actions: Social accountability training and pilots implemented in at least 6 countries (including gender related aspects) Training programme for media on investigative reporting and analysis Small grants programme in support of CSO AC activities (including proposals with a gender dimension) Regional training for relevant CSOs on UNCAC and the IRM conducted UNDP UNODC 400,000 200,000 Activity Result 2.3: South-South exchanges of expertise and knowledge Actions: Staff exchanges supported for AC institutions, as appropriate International resource persons supported to engage in support of PICs UNODC UNDP 95,834 80,000
pilots in 2 PICs (at lest one incorporating gender) Support provided to a least 1 ICAC, if established Project Management Costs UNODC Advisor (33%) UNDP Specialist (33%) Monitoring & Evaluation Project Support Costs – UNDP (7%) Project Support Costs – UNODC UNODC UNDP Joint UNDP UNODC 240,000 240,000 15,000 74,900 96,633 Sub-total (UNDP) 1,202,400 Sub-total (UNODC) 839,967 SUB-TOTAL 2,042,367 Output 3: To promote more informed anti-corruption policy and advocacy by conducting tailored research and sharing knowledge Baseline: Transparency International National Integrity System Survey produced some years ago Limited AC baseline surveys Limited PIC participation in regional/global AC meetings Outcome Indicators Baseline AC survey produced in at least 2 PICs At least 3 Pacific AC knowledge products produced 2012 Baseline survey piloted in at least 2 PIC PIC participation in AP AC COP PIC participation in IACC 2013 PIC participation in AP AC COP PIC participation in CoSP 1 AC knowledge product produced 2014 PIC participation in AP AC COP 2015: PIC participation in AP AC COP 1 AC knowledge product produced Activity Result 3.1: Capacity of UNDP staff and Govt counterparts enhanced through participation in global/regional meetings Actions: Participation supported in annual UNDP Asia Pacific AC Community of Practice Support for PIC LDCs to attend CoSP PIC participation supported in IACC UNDP UNODC 78,000 30,000 Activity Result 3.2: Knowledge products & research available to support national integrity initiatives Actions: Support for Pacific contribution to Global AC Portal and UNODC Legal Library Support for pilot national AC baseline surveys + ongoing public surveys Research commissioned on specific AC issues raised by partners (including focus on gender aspects) UNDP UNODC 80,000 105,000 Project Management Costs UNODC Advisor (33%) UNDP Specialist (33%) Monitoring & Evaluation UNODC UNDP Joint 240,000 240,000 15,000