8 0.5 to 0.75 9 10 xT' = 1 ≥0.75 In highest quarter of ranked results In highest quarter of ranked results In highest quarter of ranked results Score = 16 [1] This is the of toe location to distance of extraction bores from the coast. [2] Derivatives for all unconfined aquifers that were assessed as part of the Math Analysis component of the NSWI project were ranked by magnitude. The ranking is used to determine the rating in the above indexing table. T1 - Confined aquifer Inland extent of wedge toe, xT toe relative to extraction bores [1] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to rise [2] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to change in flows at the inland boundary [2] Weighting → Rating ↓ 2 1 1 1 1 xT < 2 km 0 In lowest quarter of ranked results In lowest quarter of ranked results 2 3 0 to 0.25 4 2 km ≤ xT ≤ 10 km In lower-mid quarter of ranked results In lower-mid quarter of ranked results 5 6 0.25 to 0.5 7 xT > 10 km In upper-mid quarter of ranked results In upper-mid quarter of ranked results 8 0.5 to 0.75 9 10 Unstable ≥0.75 In highest quarter of ranked results In highest quarter of ranked results = 50
6 0.25 to 0.5 7 0.1 < xT' < 1 In upper-mid quarter of ranked results In upper-mid quarter of ranked results In upper-mid quarter of ranked results 8 0.5 to 0.75 9 10 xT' = 1 ≥0.75 In highest quarter of ranked results In highest quarter of ranked results In highest quarter of ranked results Score = 30 [1] This is the ratio of toe location to distance of extraction bores from the coast. [2] Derivatives for all unconfined aquifers that were assessed as part of the Math Analysis component of the NSWI project were ranked by magnitude. The ranking is used to determine the rating in the indexing table. North Stradbroke Island (East & West), Queensland Unconfined aquifer Scaled wedge toe, xT' toe relative to extraction bores [1] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to rise [2] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to recharge change [2] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to change in flows at the inland boundary [2] Weighting → Rating ↓ 1 1 1 1 1 1 xT' < 0.05 0 In lowest quarter of ranked results In lowest quarter of ranked results In lowest quarter of ranked results 2 3 0 to 0.25 4 0.05 ≤ xT' ≤ 0.1 In lower-mid quarter of ranked results In lower-mid quarter of ranked results In quarter of ranked results 5 6 0.25 to 0.5 7 0.1 < xT' < 1 In quarter of ranked results In upper-mid quarter of ranked results In upper-mid quarter of ranked results
8 0.5 to 0.75 9 10 xT' = 1 ≥0.75 In highest quarter of ranked results In highest quarter of ranked results In highest quarter of ranked results Score = 10 [1] This is the ratio of toe location to distance of extraction bores from the coast. Extraction bore locations not available for this site however and therefore average rating applied. [2] Derivatives for all unconfined aquifers that were assessed as part of the Math Analysis component of the NSWI project were ranked by magnitude. The ranking is used to determine the rating in the above indexing table. Pioneer Valley Unconfined aquifer Scaled wedge toe, xT' toe relative to extraction bores [1] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to rise [2] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to recharge change [2] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to change in at the inland boundary [2] Weighting → Rating ↓ 1 1 1 1 1 1 xT' < 0.05 0 In lowest quarter of ranked results In lowest quarter of ranked results In lowest quarter of ranked results 2 3 0 to 0.25 4 0.05 ≤ xT' ≤ 0.1 In lower-mid quarter of ranked results In quarter of ranked results In lower-mid quarter of ranked results 5 6 0.25 to 0.5 7 0.1 < xT' < 1 In upper-mid quarter of ranked results In upper-mid quarter of ranked results In upper-mid quarter of ranked results 8 0.5 to 0.75
9 10 xT' = 1 ≥0.75 In highest quarter of ranked results In highest quarter of ranked results In highest quarter of ranked results Score = 16 [1] This is the ratio of toe location to distance of extraction bores from the coast. [2] Derivatives for all unconfined aquifers that were assessed as part of the Math Analysis component of the NSWI project were ranked by magnitude. The ranking is used to determine the rating in the above indexing table. Burdekin, Queensland Unconfined aquifer Scaled wedge toe, xT' Wedge toe relative to extraction bores [1] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to rise [2] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to recharge change [2] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to change in flows at the inland boundary [2] Weighting → Rating ↓ 1 1 1 1 1 1 xT' < 0.05 0 In lowest quarter of ranked results In lowest quarter of ranked results In lowest quarter of ranked results 2 3 0 to 0.25 4 0.05 ≤ xT' ≤ 0.1 In lower-mid quarter of ranked results In quarter of ranked results In lower-mid quarter of ranked results 5 6 0.25 to 0.5 7 0.1 < xT' < 1 In upper-mid quarter of ranked results In upper-mid quarter of ranked results In upper-mid quarter of ranked results 8 0.5 to 0.75 9 10 xT' = 1 ≥0.75 In highest quarter of ranked results In highest quarter of ranked results In highest quarter of ranked results
Score = 50 [1] This is the ratio of toe location to distance of extraction bores from the coast. [2] Derivatives for all unconfined aquifers that were assessed as part of the Math Analysis component of the NSWI project were ranked by magnitude. The ranking is used to determine the rating in the above indexing table. Burnett (Moore Park) Queensland Unconfined aquifer Scaled wedge toe, xT' Wedge toe relative to extraction bores [1] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to rise [2] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to recharge change [2] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to change in flows at the inland boundary [2] Weighting → Rating ↓ 1 1 1 1 1 1 xT' < 0.05 0 In lowest quarter of ranked results In lowest quarter of ranked results In lowest quarter of ranked results 2 3 0 to 0.25 4 0.05 ≤ xT' ≤ 0.1 In lower-mid quarter of ranked results In quarter of ranked results In lower-mid quarter of ranked results 5 6 0.25 to 0.5 7 0.1 < xT' < 1 In upper-mid quarter of ranked results In upper-mid quarter of ranked results In quarter of ranked results 8 0.5 to 0.75 9 10 xT' = 1 ≥0.75 In highest quarter of ranked results In highest quarter of ranked results In highest quarter of ranked results = 36 [1] This is the ratio of toe location to distance of extraction bores from the coast.
Leederville - Confined aquifer Inland extent of toe, xT Wedge toe relative to extraction bores [1] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to rise [2] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to change in at the inland boundary [2] Weighting → Rating ↓ 2 1 1 1 1 xT < 2 km 0 In lowest quarter of ranked results In lowest quarter of ranked results 2 3 0 to 0.25 4 2 km ≤ xT ≤ 10 km In lower-mid quarter of ranked results In lower-mid quarter of ranked results 5 6 0.25 to 0.5 7 xT > 10 km In upper-mid quarter of ranked results In upper-mid quarter of ranked results 8 0.5 to 0.75 9 10 Unstable ≥0.75 In highest quarter of ranked results In highest quarter of ranked results Score = 32 [1] This is the ratio of toe location to distance of extraction bores from the coast. [2] Derivatives for all confined aquifers that were assessed as part of the Math Analysis component of the NSWI project were ranked by magnitude. The ranking is used to determine the rating in the above indexing table. Yarragadee - Confined aquifer Inland extent of wedge toe, xT toe relative to extraction bores [1] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to rise [2] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to change in flows at the inland boundary [2] Weighting → Rating ↓ 2 1 1 1
6 7 50 m > hmax > 20 m In upper-mid quarter of ranked results 8 9 10 hmax ≤ 20 m In highest quarter of ranked results Score = 38 [1] Derivatives for all lens systems that were assessed as part of the Math Analysis component of the NSWI project were ranked by magnitude. The ranking is used to determine the rating. Esperance, Western Australia Superficial/Pallinup – Unconfined aquifer Scaled wedge toe, xT' toe relative to extraction bores [1] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to rise [2] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to recharge change [2] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to change in flows at the inland boundary [2] Weighting → Rating ↓ 1 1 1 1 1 1 xT' < 0.05 0 In lowest quarter of ranked results In lowest quarter of ranked results In lowest quarter of ranked results 2 3 0 to 0.25 4 0.05 ≤ xT' ≤ 0.1 In lower-mid quarter of ranked results In lower-mid quarter of ranked results In lower-mid quarter of ranked results 5 6 0.25 to 0.5 7 0.1 < xT' < 1 In upper-mid quarter of ranked results In upper-mid quarter of ranked results In quarter of ranked results 8 0.5 to 0.75
9 10 xT' = 1 ≥0.75 In highest quarter of ranked results In highest quarter of ranked results In highest quarter of ranked results = 43 [1] This is the ratio of toe location to distance of extraction bores from the coast. [2] Derivatives for all unconfined aquifers that were assessed as part of the Math Analysis component of the NSWI project were ranked by magnitude. The ranking is used to determine the rating in the above indexing table. Werillup - Confined aquifer Inland extent of wedge toe, xT Wedge toe relative to extraction bores [1] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to rise [2] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to change in flows at the inland boundary [2] Weighting → Rating ↓ 2 1 1 1 1 xT < 2 km 0 In lowest quarter of ranked results In lowest quarter of ranked results 2 3 0 to 0.25 4 2 km ≤ xT ≤ 10 km In quarter of ranked results In lower-mid quarter of ranked results 5 6 0.25 to 0.5 7 xT > 10 km In upper-mid quarter of ranked results In quarter of ranked results 8 0.5 to 0.75 9 10 Unstable ≥0.75 In highest quarter of ranked results In highest quarter of ranked results Score = 50 [1] This is the ratio of toe location to distance of extraction bores from the coast.
Busselton, Western Australia Superficial – Unconfined aquifer Scaled wedge toe, xT' Wedge toe relative to extraction bores [1] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to rise [2] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to recharge change [2] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to change in flows at the inland boundary [2] Weighting → Rating ↓ 1 1 1 1 1 1 xT' < 0.05 0 In lowest quarter of ranked results In lowest quarter of ranked results In lowest quarter of ranked results 2 3 0 to 0.25 4 0.05 ≤ xT' ≤ 0.1 In quarter of ranked results In quarter of ranked results In lower-mid quarter of ranked results 5 6 0.25 to 0.5 7 0.1 < xT' < 1 In upper-mid quarter of ranked results In upper-mid quarter of ranked results In upper-mid quarter of ranked results 8 0.5 to 0.75 9 10 xT' = 1 ≥0.75 In highest quarter of ranked results In highest quarter of ranked results In highest quarter of ranked results Score = 13 [1] This is the of toe location to distance of extraction bores from the coast. [2] Derivatives for all unconfined aquifers that were assessed as part of the Math Analysis component of the NSWI project were ranked by magnitude. The ranking is used to determine the rating in the above indexing table. Leederville - Confined aquifer Inland extent of wedge toe, xT Wedge toe relative to extraction bores [1] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to rise [2] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to change in at the inland boundary [2]
Weighting → Rating ↓ 2 1 1 1 1 xT < 2 km 0 In lowest quarter of ranked results In lowest quarter of ranked results 2 3 0 to 0.25 4 2 km ≤ xT ≤ 10 km In lower-mid quarter of ranked results In lower-mid quarter of ranked results 5 6 0.25 to 0.5 7 xT > 10 km In upper-mid quarter of ranked results In upper-mid quarter of ranked results 8 0.5 to 0.75 9 10 Unstable ≥0.75 In highest quarter of ranked results In highest quarter of ranked results Score = 10 [1] This is the ratio of toe location to distance of extraction bores from the coast. [2] Derivatives for all confined aquifers that were assessed as part of the Math Analysis component of the NSWI project were ranked by magnitude. The ranking is used to determine the rating in the above indexing table. Bunbury, Western Australia Superficial – Unconfined aquifer Scaled toe, xT' Wedge toe relative to extraction bores [1] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to rise [2] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to recharge change [2] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to change in flows at the inland boundary [2] Weighting → Rating ↓ 1 1 1 1 1
1 xT' < 0.05 0 In lowest quarter of ranked results In lowest quarter of ranked results In lowest quarter of ranked results 2 3 0 to 0.25 4 0.05 ≤ xT' ≤ 0.1 In lower-mid quarter of ranked results In lower-mid quarter of ranked results In lower-mid quarter of ranked results 5 6 0.25 to 0.5 7 0.1 < xT' < 1 In upper-mid quarter of ranked results In upper-mid quarter of ranked results In quarter of ranked results 8 0.5 to 0.75 9 10 xT' = 1 ≥0.75 In highest quarter of ranked results In highest quarter of ranked results In highest quarter of ranked results = 16 [1] This is the ratio of toe location to distance of extraction bores from the coast. [2] Derivatives for all unconfined aquifers that were assessed as part of the Math Analysis component of the NSWI project were ranked by magnitude. The ranking is used to determine the rating in the indexing table. Yarragadee - Confined aquifer Inland extent of toe, xT Wedge toe relative to extraction bores [1] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to rise [2] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to change in flows at the inland boundary [2] Weighting → Rating ↓ 2 1 1 1 1 xT < 2 km 0 In lowest quarter of ranked results In lowest quarter of ranked results 2 3 0 to 0.25
6 0.25 to 0.5 7 0.1 < xT' < 1 In upper-mid quarter of ranked results In upper-mid quarter of ranked results In upper-mid quarter of ranked results 8 0.5 to 0.75 9 10 xT' = 1 ≥0.75 In highest quarter of ranked results In highest quarter of ranked results In highest quarter of ranked results Score = 25 [1] This is the ratio of toe location to distance of extraction bores from the coast. [2] Derivatives for all unconfined aquifers that were assessed as part of the Math Analysis component of the NSWI project were ranked by magnitude. The ranking is used to determine the rating in the indexing table. Alluvium - Confined aquifer Inland extent of wedge toe, xT Wedge toe relative to extraction bores [1] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to rise [2] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to change in flows at the inland boundary [2] Weighting → Rating ↓ 2 1 1 1 1 xT < 2 km 0 In lowest quarter of ranked results In lowest quarter of ranked results 2 3 0 to 0.25 4 2 km ≤ xT ≤ 10 km In lower-mid quarter of ranked results In quarter of ranked results 5 6 0.25 to 0.5 7 xT > 10 km In upper-mid quarter of ranked results In upper-mid quarter of ranked results 8 0.5 to 0.75 9
Botany New South Wales Botany Sand Beds - Unconfined aquifer Scaled wedge toe, xT' Wedge toe relative to extraction bores [1] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to rise [2] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to recharge change [2] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to change in flows at the inland boundary [2] Weighting → Rating ↓ 1 1 1 1 1 1 xT' < 0.05 0 In lowest quarter of ranked results In lowest quarter of ranked results In lowest quarter of ranked results 2 3 0 to 0.25 4 0.05 ≤ xT' ≤ 0.1 In lower-mid quarter of ranked results In lower-mid quarter of ranked results In lower-mid quarter of ranked results 5 6 0.25 to 0.5 7 0.1 < xT' < 1 In upper-mid quarter of ranked results In upper-mid quarter of ranked results In upper-mid quarter of ranked results 8 0.5 to 0.75 9 10 xT' = 1 ≥0.75 In highest quarter of ranked results In highest quarter of ranked results In highest quarter of ranked results Score = 28 [1] This is the ratio of toe location to distance of extraction bores from the coast. [2] Derivatives for all unconfined aquifers that were assessed as part of the Math Analysis component of the NSWI project were ranked by magnitude. The ranking is used to determine the rating in the above indexing table.
Stockton, New South Wales Stockton Sand Beds - Unconfined aquifer Scaled wedge toe, xT' Wedge toe relative to extraction bores [1] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to rise [2] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to recharge change [2] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to change in flows at the inland boundary [2] Weighting → Rating ↓ 1 1 1 1 1 1 xT' < 0.05 0 In lowest quarter of ranked results In lowest quarter of ranked results In lowest quarter of ranked results 2 3 0 to 0.25 4 0.05 ≤ xT' ≤ 0.1 In quarter of ranked results In lower-mid quarter of ranked results In quarter of ranked results 5 6 0.25 to 0.5 7 0.1 < xT' < 1 In upper-mid quarter of ranked results In upper-mid quarter of ranked results In upper-mid quarter of ranked results 8 0.5 to 0.75 9 10 xT' = 1 ≥0.75 In highest quarter of ranked results In highest quarter of ranked results In highest quarter of ranked results Score = 16 [1] This is the ratio of toe location to distance of extraction bores from the coast. [2] Derivatives for all unconfined aquifers that were assessed as part of the Math Analysis component of the NSWI project were ranked by magnitude. The ranking is used to determine the rating in the above indexing table.