Study Study 2 Author’s & Year Mohr, C.; Ho, Duffecy, Reifler, Sokol, Burns, Jin & Siddique, 2012 Serfaty, Haworth, Blanchard, Buszewicz, Murad & King, 2009 Design RCT RCT Intervention (I) and Comparison (C) (I): Telephone-administered cognitive behavioural therapy (C): Face-to-face cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) (I): Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) + TAU (GP contact) (C): Talking control group + TAU (GP contact) (C): TAU (GP contact) Country USA UK Intervention Delivery methods, frequency, duration, (delivered to) 18 weekly sessions. T-CBT patients attended significantly more sessions (mean 16) than receiving CBT (mean 14) (Individual) Up to 12 (average of seven) 50 minute sessions (Individual) Depression Diagnosis Met criteria for MDD and scored ≥16 on Ham-D Geriatric Mental Diagnosis of Depression Primary Outcome domain (Measure(s)) Discontinuation vs. of treatment before week 18 Depression symptoms ( BDI-II) Secondary Outcome domain (Measure(s)) Depression symptoms (HRSD; PHQ-9) Anxiety (BAI) Social functioning (SFQ) Quality of life (Euroqol) Characteristics of Sample N = 325 N = 204 Aged ≥65 Participants: I N = 163 age (M=48, SD=14) 77% female N = 70 age (M=74, SD=8) 84% female Participants: C N = 162 age (M= 48, SD=13) 78% female N = 67 (Talking control group + TAU)
Study Study 2 Study 3 Author’s & Year Carter, Luty, McKenzie, Mulder, Frampton & Joyce, 2011 Power & Freeman, 2012 Talbot, Chaudron, Ward, Duberstein, Conwell, O'Hara, Tu, Lu, He & Stuart, 2011 Design RCT RCT RCT Intervention (I) and Comparison (C) (I): Interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) (I): Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) (I): therapy (CBT) (I): Interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) (C): TAU (GP contact) (I): Interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) (C): TAU (biweekly individual sessions a variety of interventions including supportive, or integrated/eclectic and client-centred approaches) Country New Zealand UK USA Intervention Delivery methods, frequency, duration, (delivered to) Up to 19 weekly sessions, with a minimum of (Individual) 16 sessions (IPT) 12-16 sessions (CBT) (Individual) Up to 16 sessions (average of 13) over 36 weeks (Individual)
Study Author’s & Year Johansson, Ekbladh, Hebert, Lindström, Möller, Petitt, Poysti, Larsson, Rousseau, Carlbring, Cuijpers & Andersson, 2012 Design RCT Intervention (I) and Comparison (C) (I): psychodynamic guided self-help treatment (C): Structured support intervention (psychoeducation and weekly online contact) Country Sweden Intervention Delivery methods, frequency, duration, (delivered to) Nine modules, including weekly contact with therapist, over ten weeks. 78% of participants completed all modules.
Appendix 7 Citation list by ranking Type of Intervention Included Studies Supported CBT IPT Mohr, Ho, Duffecy, Reifler, Sokol, Burns, Jin, & Siddique, 2012 Serfaty, Haworth, Blanchard, Buszewicz, Murad, & King, 2009 Carter, 2011, Luty, McKenzie, Mulder, Frampton, & Joyce, 2011 Power, & Freeman, 2011 Talbot, Chaudron, Ward, Duberstein, Conwell, O’Hara, Tu, Lu, He, & Stuart, 2011 Promising Behavioural activation psychodynamic psychotherapy Couples therapy Richards, McMillan, Bland, & Gilbody, 2011 Johansson, Ekbladh, Hebert, Lindström, Möller, Petitt, Poysti, Larsson, Rousseau, Carlbring, Cuijpers, & Andersson, 2012 No new studies Unknown REBT Problem-solving Counselling Sava, Yates, Lupu, Szentagotai & David, 2009 Not Supported
Appendix 8 Telephone CBT vs CBT CBT vs Treatment as usual vs Talking control with GP contact Interventions 2 2 Study n 1 1 Guidelines/ Systematic review/ 1 1 RCT Cohort studies N/A Case- controlled N/A Pre –Post N/A Case series N/A N/A Case reports N/A Other N/A Evidence Map Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapy (REBT)
N/A Case series N/A Cross-sectional N/A Case reports N/A N/A Behavioural Activation Behavioural Activation vs Treatment as Usual Interventions 2 Study n 1 Guidelines/ Systematic review/ Meta-analysis 2 RCT Pseudo-RCT Cohort studies N/A Case- controlled N/A