zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
HAZARDS CONSEQUENCES WHO IS AT RISK RISK LEVEL CONTROLS ACTION LEVEL Identify the hazards. List the hazards: NB - Below is a list of potential areas that hazards may arise from: Adverse weather Complex structure Compressed air Dust/fumes Electricity Falling objects Fall from height Fire Gas/LPG Hazardous substance Special effect Stored energy Use of lifting equipment Use of vehicles Use of work equipment Equipment/machinery Explosion Extreme temperature Noise Radiation Slip/fall Water features What could result from the hazards? List the results: NB - Consider the likely effects which could lead to any of the following: First aid injury RIDDOR 3 day injury Serious injury – Usually an injury from which full recovery is likely. Death or very serious Injury to one person - Life changing injury from which full recovery is unlikely. Death or very serious injury to more than one person. Who might be harmed? List everyone who might be harmed by each hazard: Example • Organiser’s staff • Venue staff • Exhibitors • Contractors • Young/new inexperienced staff • Disabled • Children • New and expectant mothers • Trespassers • Pedestrians and drivers around the venue • inhabitants Calculate the level of Risk: To calculate the risk level, use the formula below, where: Probability (1-5) X Severity (1-5) = Risk (between 1-25) PxS = R What controls can be implemented to reduce either the probability or severity of the risk? NB - Consider the risk control hierarchy: Eliminate Substitute Reduce Isolate Control PPE Discipline Once the controls have been considered and recorded, re-calculate the Risk (PxS=R) and determine the Action Level, where: High 8+ = Immediate action required Medium 5-7 = Justify and review each event day Low 1-4 = No further action required Guide to Risk Assessments
Eliminate Remove the hazard wherever possible which negates the need for further controls If this is not possible then explain why Substitute Replace the hazard with one less hazardous If not possible then explain why Physical controls Examples: enclosure, fume cupboard, glove box Likely to still require admin controls as well Admin controls Examples: training, supervision, signage Personal protection Examples: respirators, safety specs, gloves Last resort as it only protects the individual LIKELIHOOD 5 5 10 15 20 25 4 4 8 12 16 20 3 3 6 9 12 15 2 2 4 6 8 10 1 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 IMPACT Impact Health & Safety 1 Trivial - insignificant Very minor injuries e.g. slight bruising 2 Minor Injuries or illness e.g. small cut or abrasion which require basic first aid treatment even in 3 Moderate Injuries or illness e.g. strain or sprain requiring first aid or medical support. 4 Major Injuries or illness e.g. broken bone requiring medical support >24 hours and time off work >4 weeks. 5 Severe – extremely significant Fatality or multiple serious injuries or illness requiring hospital admission or significant time off work. Likelihood 1 Rare e.g. 1 in 100,000 chance or higher 2 Unlikely e.g. 1 in 10,000 chance or higher 3 Possible e.g. 1 in 1,000 chance or higher 4 Likely e.g. 1 in 100 chance or higher 5 Very Likely e.g. 1 in 10 chance or higher
Identify, assess and control your risks IDENTIFY ASSESS CONTROL Risk Factor/Hazard Describe your risk What are your existing controls? What is the current risk rating? To further reduce risk what proposed controls have you considered? Who is responsible for these controls? Due date What is the residual risk rating? Approved by (Name): ________________________ Signature address when completing this form on-line is acceptable): ________________________ Date: ____________________
People Client interactions Psycho-social Travelling/journey Working alone/late Working from home Any other people hazards? Expectations and Workloads Experience Harassment Nature of work Personal issues Physical environment Security Supervision and Training provided Other stress factors Guide for preventing and responding to workplace bullying: 2016 Dealing with workplace bullying – a worker’s guide: 2016 Physical Confined/enclosed spaces Construction work Environmental conditions Evacuation Field work First Aid Objects Slip, trip, fall Work area design Working at heights Any other physical hazards? Communication Environment including Weather Equipment Experience Hazardous Materials Location Medical factors of people Processes/Work tasks Training provided Transport Managing the Work Environment and Facilities COP 2011 Managing the Risk of Falls at Workplaces COP 2018 Confined Spaces COP 2016 Safe Design of Structures COP 2013 First Aid in the Workplace COP 2013 Occupational Diving Work COP 2005 Recreational Diving, Recreational Technical Diving and Snorkelling COP 2018 AS 2865:2009 - Confined spaces AS/NZS 2299 (Series) Occupational diving operations Plant Crushing Cutting, stabbing, puncturing Entanglement Equipment/tools – powered/non-powered Ergonomics Explosion Friction High pressure fluid Impact Suffocation Temperature extremes Any other plant hazards? Access Compliance with relevant Australian Standards Fit for purpose Guarding Noise Training Type Working alone Working conditions Managing Noise and Preventing Hearing Loss at Work COP 2011 Managing Risks of Plant in the Workplace COP 2013 painting and Powder Coating Code of Practice 2013 Welding Processes COP 2013 AS 1473:1991 - Guarding and safe use of woodworking machinery AS 1893:1977 - The guarding and safe use of metal and paper cutting guillotines AS 4024 (Series) Safety of machinery AS 4839:2001 - The safe use of portable and mobile oxy-fuel gas systems for welding, cutting, heating & allied processes AS/NZS 1269 (Series) Occupational noise management Psychosocial Autonomy/job control Change management Job demands/workload Organisational justice Recognition/career development Relationships Role conflict/ambiguity Support Environment, i.e. noise, air quality, exposure to heat/cold Individual factors, i.e. personal resilience, experiences, family issues Organisational issues Guide for preventing and responding to workplace bullying: 2016 Dealing with workplace bullying – a worker’s guide: 2016
Risk Assessment Carried out by___________________ Date_________________ Location of risk assessment_________________ Date of next assessment_____________________ What is the hazard? Who is at risk from the hazard? What are you already doing to reduce this risk? Do you need to do anything else to manage the risk? Who is responsible for further action? When will the safety precautions be put in place? Tick when the safety precautions are in place.
Assessing risk – consideration of information contained in the Disclosure In considering the information provided in the PVG/Disclosure the manager must be proportionate and fair. A criminal record does not exclude an individual from the workforce but, it may indicate that they are not suitable to undertake a particular post. The manager should consider the following: Whether the person is ‘barred’ from working with particular vulnerable groups, Whether the information is relevant to the post applied for e.g. many findings on PVG/Disclosures relate to road traffic offences and will not be relevant if driving is not an essential element of the post. However, if the road traffic offences are of a more serious nature such as; drink driving or driving without licence and/or insurance, this may reflect the person’s attitude to the safety of others and should be taken into consideration. Whether the information is of a ‘serious’ nature? ‘Serious’ can be defined as behaviour which has or is likely to place individuals at risk of harm, such as; theft, fraud, assault and sexual risk. The manager should indicate in the tool why they believe the behaviour to be of a ‘serious’ nature, What is the length of time since the offence or other relevant matter occurred, Whether is a pattern of offending or other issues, Whether the person’s circumstances have changed since the offending behaviour, What, if any, action is required and possible to minimise offending behaviour. The risk assessment form The form provides a checklist of to facilitate consideration and recommendation on the suitability of the nominated candidate for the post. Following discussion/meeting with the nominated candidate, the manager should complete the risk assessment form with a recommendation on whether or not the nominated candidate is suitable or unsuitable for the post, based on the PVG/Disclosure information provided and discussion with the individual. A template for recording the meeting has been provided. This is optional but may assist in the completion of the risk assessment. The risk assessment should be shared with a senior manager who will verify the process and consider the recommendation of the recruiting manager before a final decision is made to confirm or rescind the offer of employment. Whichever decision is made, the recruiting manager will advise the candidate verbally of the decision (noting the date of the conversation), before this is confirmed in writing by the Recruitment Team. Retention and storage of the risk assessment information If the decision is to appoint the candidate, the following should be filed and retained. risk assessment form, signed by both managers – retained indefinitely,
{Company Name} – Risk Assessment Worksheet Assessed Job Title: Supervisor: Date: Department: Assessment Conducted by: Applicable Regulations: Critical Job Steps Potential Hazards *Risk Level (Consequence x Probability) Control Measures or Procedures C P R Step 1: 5 Step 2:
Exercise Name: [Insert exercise name] Exercise Date: [Insert exercise date] Organization/Jurisdiction: [Insert organization or jurisdiction] Venue: [Insert venue name] Mitigation Exercise Objective: [Insert exercise objective] Core Capability: Risk and Disaster Resilience Assessment Assess risk and disaster resilience so that decision makers, responders, and community members can take informed action to reduce their entity’s risk and increase their resilience. Organizational Capability Target 1: [Insert customized target based on plans and assessments] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, plans, or SOPs] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, or SOPs] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, plans, or SOPs] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, plans, or SOPs] Source(s): [Insert name of plan, policy, procedure, or reference] Organizational Capability Target 2: [Insert customized target based on plans and assessments] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, plans, or SOPs] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, plans, or SOPs] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, plans, or SOPs] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, plans, or SOPs] Source(s): [Insert name of plan, policy, procedure, or reference] Organizational Capability Target 3: [Insert customized target on plans and assessments] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, plans, or SOPs] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, plans, or SOPs] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, plans, or SOPs] Critical Task: [Insert task from frameworks, plans, or SOPs] Source(s): [Insert name of plan, policy, procedure, or reference]
Organizational Capability Target Associated Critical Tasks Observation Notes and Explanation of Rating Target Rating [Insert Organizational Capability Target 1 from page 1] [Insert Organizational Capability Target 1 Critical Tasks from page 1] [Insert Organizational Capability Target 2 from page 1] [Insert Organizational Capability Target 2 Critical Tasks from page 1] [Insert Organizational Capability Target 3 from page 1] [Insert Organizational Capability Target 3 Critical Tasks from page 1] Final Core Capability Rating Ratings Key P – Performed without Challenges S – Performed with Some Challenges M – Performed with Challenges U – Unable to be Performed Evaluator Name Evaluator E-mail
What effects are any released diseases or parasites likely to have at the destination or potential receiving waters? Some diseases and parasites are host specific. Therefore the effect of these on other species in the potential receiving waters will alter depending on the inhabitants of those waters. Provide details of the potential effects that any diseases or parasites could have on species found at the destination or potential receiving waters. Based on the answers to Questions 7.1 to 7.9, what are the consequences of establishment? on questions 7.1-7.11 what are the consequences of establishment of the target species or diseases and parasites at the destination or potential receiving waters. Summary argument: Socio-Economic What are the social or community impacts associated with your proposal to translocate? Describe the social benefits that may be gained from the proposal to translocate an organism e.g fish for tourism. Detail whether these social benefits will "outweigh" any of the social aspects of other activities in the proposed receiving waters e.g damage to other recreational fisheries. What are the estimated economic impacts associated with your proposal to translocate? Provide details of the economic impacts of the proposal. may be positive effects such as regional employment and tourism or negative effects such as the cost of eradication and or recovery programs.
exposure threshold has been adopted to account for the acute effects of substances that have primarily chronic affects. Threshold Limit Value – Ceiling (TLV-C): This is the concentration that should not be exceeded during any part of the working exposure. Peak exposures should be always controlled. For substances that do not have TLV-TWA or TLV-C established, the maximum admissible peak concentrations must not exceed: Three-times the value of the TLV-TWA for no more than 15 minutes, no more than four times per workday. Exposures must be at least 1 hour apart during the workday. Five times the TLV-TWA under any circumstances. Action Level: is the level of exposure to a hazardous substance at which an employer must take the required precautions to protect the workers; it is normally one-half of the permissible exposure limit. The of measures for the threshold limit values are ppm and mg/m3. The TLVs for aerosols are expressed usually in mg/m3. The TLVs for gases and vapors are expressed in ppm or mg/m3. An exposure rating is assigned to each chemical and activity pair. Where air monitoring results are available, the weekly time weighted average exposure may be estimated using the following equation: Where: E = weekly exposure (ppm or mg/m3) F = frequency of exposure per week (no. per week) M = magnitude of exposure (ppm or mg/m3) W = average working hours per week (40 hours) D = average duration of each exposure (hours) Table . Calculating the exposure rating when PEL (OEL or TWA) data is available Exposure Rating (ER) E / PEL 1 < 0.1 2 0.1 to < 0.5 3 0.5 to < 1.0 4 1.0 to < 2.0 5 ≥ 2.0
Factor vapors (Pvap) < 0.1 mm Hg 0.1 to 1 mmHg > 1 to 10 mmHg > 10 to 100 mmHg > 100 mmHg particulate Coarse, bulk or wet material Coarse and dry material Dry and particle size > 100 µm Dry and fine material 1- to 100 µm Dry and fine powdered material < 10 µm Dermal absorption Large molecules (MW > 400 g/mol) Chemical known to produce skin irritation Chemical known as a significant skin and eye irritant Chemical known as a dermally absorbed chemical from in vitro studies; “Skin” designation Known as a dermally absorbed chemical from in vivo animal studies; “Skin” designation Ratio of OT/OEL* < 0.1 0.1 to 0.5 > 0.5 to 1 > 1 to 2 ≥ 2 Hazard control measure Adequate control with regular maintenance Adequate control with irregular maintenance Adequate control without maintenance; moderately dusty Inadequate control; dusty No control at all; very dusty Amount used per week Almost negligible amount used Little amount used Medium amount used, workers are trained on handling the chemical Large amount used, workers are trained on handling the chemical Large amount used, workers are not trained on handling the chemical Duration of work per week < 8 hrs 8 to 16 hrs 16 to 24 hrs 24 to 32 hrs 32 to 40 hrs * Odor threshold (OT) divided by the occupational exposure limit (OEL) The likelihood of exposure to a chemical is largely determined by the presence of engineering controls and effectiveness. A properly designed and well-constructed local exhaust system will greatly reduce the exposure risk, whereas an open process or poorly designed and maintained system can result
Considered day to day commute e.g. safe use of public transport, own vehicle, etc.? YES NO Accommodation Arranged accommodation and considered its location with respect to where you are studying or working and the neighbourhood it is in? YES NO Individual Considered any health condition(s) (physical, mental or psychological) or any disabilities that may require medication or specific arrangements? YES NO Not Applicable If relevant, ensured that you have enough medication and support for the time you are on exchange, placement or fieldwork? YES NO Not Applicable Cultural Identified any cultural differences that may affect you and consider consequences of actions within the host country (e.g. religious differences, differences in laws, appropriate clothing, communication, appropriate behaviour, attitudes towards gender and sexuality, politically sensitive issues)? YES NO Not Applicable Climate/Time Differences Considered differences in temperature, humidity, altitude, seasons, time differences, jet lag etc.? YES NO Not Applicable Considered whether acclimatisation is required? YES NO Not Applicable Insurance Completed a travel insurance form and sent to Finance? YES NO Not Applicable Received the travel insurance card? YES NO Not Applicable Obtained a European Health Insurance Card (if applicable)? YES NO Not Applicable Read the advice on obtaining medical treatment in the host country? YES NO Not Applicable Applied for the host university health insurance (if exchange student)? YES NO Not Applicable Other Factors Read FCO advice regarding safety to travel to your destination? YES NO Not Applicable Ensured that you have a passport valid for 6 months beyond the expected date of return from the host country YES NO Not Applicable Obtained or will obtain a relevant visa or permit? YES NO Not Applicable Obtained vaccination certificates for the host country? YES NO Not Applicable Considered financial support you will need whilst you are on exchange, placement or fieldwork YES NO
Considered day to day commute e.g. safe use of public transport, own vehicle, etc.? YES NO Accommodation Arranged accommodation and considered its location with respect to where you are studying or working and the neighbourhood it is in? YES NO Individual Considered any health condition(s) (physical, mental or psychological) or any other disabilities that may require medication or specific arrangements? YES NO Not Applicable If relevant, ensured that you have enough medication and support for the time you are on exchange, placement or fieldwork? YES NO Not Applicable Cultural Identified any cultural differences that may affect you and consider consequences of actions within the host country (e.g. religious differences, differences in laws, appropriate clothing, communication, appropriate behaviour, attitudes towards gender and sexuality, politically sensitive issues)? YES NO Not Applicable Climate/Time Differences Considered differences in temperature, humidity, altitude, seasons, time differences, jet lag etc.? YES NO Not Applicable Considered whether acclimatisation is required? YES NO Not Applicable Insurance Completed a travel insurance form and sent to Finance? YES NO Not Applicable Received the travel insurance card? YES NO Not Applicable Obtained a European Health Insurance Card (if applicable)? YES NO Not Applicable Read the advice on obtaining medical treatment in the host country? YES NO Not Applicable Applied for the host university health insurance (if exchange student)? YES NO Not Applicable Other Factors Read FCO advice regarding safety to travel to your destination? YES NO Not Applicable Ensured that you have a passport for 6 months beyond the expected date of return from the host country YES NO Not Applicable Obtained or will obtain a relevant visa or permit? YES NO Not Applicable Obtained vaccination certificates for the host country? YES NO Not Applicable Considered financial support you will need whilst you are on exchange, placement or fieldwork YES NO
Injury Minor injuries not requiring first aid Minor injuries requiring first aid. Superficial injuries, minor cuts and bruises; eye irritation from dust. Worker incapacitated or absent from work for up to 3 days. Lacerations; minor burns; sprains Worker incapacitated or absent from work for more than 7+ days. Lacerations; concussion; serious sprains; minor fractures. Fatal injuries. Amputations. Multiple injuries; serious burns; loss of sight; major fractures. Loss of consciousness caused by head injury or asphyxia. Other impacts None Warning letters from enforcement bodies or legal action unlikely. Claims unlikely Unlikely to be result in adverse press coverage Damage minor and causes no significant disruption Cost of rectifying low Little or no impact on staff morale RAE score unaffected claims for moderate amounts press coverage Some impact on staff morale. Increased dissatisfaction, reduced cooperation and productivity RAE score threatened HSE investigation leading to fees for intervention Improvement notice Prosecutions for minor offences leading to fines in magistrate’s court. Civil claims for major amounts Part of building lost or temporary disruption to work Significant costs needed to remedy Impact RAE score HSE investigation leading to fees for intervention. Corporate manslaughter or high profile H&S prosecution – Crown court. Substantial fines, imprisonment, High profile claim (e.g. stress) or large arising from major incidents. National press coverage Long term disruption to business. e.g.whole building lost or activity prevented by damage, contamination or prohibition notice. Major cost impact to remedy. Major impact on staff morale. Widespread discontent. Poor industrial relations.
way please enter NO in the box. If this is left blank you imply your consent. Where did you hear about Cyber Essentials? SME Definition Company category Employees Turnover Balance sheet total Medium-sized < 250 ≤ € 50 m ≤ € 43 m Small < 50 ≤ € 10 m ≤ € 10 m Micro < 10 ≤ € 2 m ≤ € 2 m As a Cyber Essentials scheme Applicant, you must ensure that your organisation meets all the requirements. You are also required to supply various forms of evidence before Risk Factory can award certification at the level you seek. Please use screen grabs and insert policy notes where possible. Let’s get started; Whilst completing this questionnaire please use the document, ‘Requirements for IT infrastructure published by QG – 6th February 2017. We have cross referenced each clause and question so you can see clearly the intent of the question you are answering at the time. Establish the boundary of scope for your organisation, and determine what is in scope within this boundary. (including locations, network boundaries, management and ownership. Where possible, include IP addresses and/or ranges.) Ensure your password policy is in place and meets the password based-authentication requirements, as this is used in three of the five control themes. Review each of the five technical control themes and the controls they embody as requirements. Take steps as necessary to ensure that your organisation meets every requirement, throughout the scope you have determined. If you can’t, highlight any compensating controls you have put in place to mitigate the risk. Business Scope
Qualified SWPPP Developer Company Name RBF Consulting Full Name Street Address City, St. Zip Number address (bold) Preparation Date: Month Day, Year Estimated Construction Dates: Construction Start Date: Month Day, Year Construction Completion Date: Month Day, Year
Discharge Sampling Report Sampler’s Name: _____________________________ Date: ________________________ Type of Sampling (Circle One): Rain Event Non-Stormwater *Non Visible Pollutant Sampling Event? (Circle One) Yes No *Note: Non-visible pollutant sampling is only required if there is potential for non-visible pollutants to discharge from the site. See Section 8.3.2 of the SWPPP for additional guidance and requirements for non-visible pollutant sampling. Sampling Location (Consult SWPPP Map for Name and Location of Sampling Points) Time of Sample Collection Parameter (pH, Turbidity, or Specific Pollutant) Analysis Performed By (List Laboratory or Person) Result (Include units) % of Site Discharge
Contractor/Subcontractor Company Name: __________ Name:______________ Address:__________ City, State, Zip: ____________ Telephone Number (including emergency contact number[s]):___________ Fax: ____________ Email:_____________ Install, maintain, and replace erosion and sediment controls. Appendix J Contractors and Subcontractors CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS Contractor/Subcontractor Name and Address Contact Person/ Phone Number Activity Start Date End Date
Date, time, sampling location, visual and Test Method/ Protocol Type Min. Limit Action Level Test Associated BMP and Corrective Action pH Field test with portable Type 2 0.2 pH Units Lower NAL = 6.5 Upper NAL = 8.5 Turbidity EPA 0180.1 and/or field test with portable Type 2 other than 1 NTU NTU 250 NTU For 1 NTU NTU N/A Appendix M Rain Event Action Plan (REAP) Template and Completed Plans
Boating: Girl Guide Managed 1. Boating is classified as Near (low risk); open water (higher risk) ; overnight trip; multiday moving trip 2. Participants for each type of boating beyond the Near Shore need training and experience beyond the swim test –The higher the risk – more training/experience. Girls must be 12 years of age to canoe trip. 3. Boating facilitators – instructors, trip etc. require increasing training and experience to conduct boating at higher risk levels. Open water boating, and overnights there must be at least 2 facilitators. 4. Maximum size of any boating group for open water boating and overnights is 12 including the facilitators. Dec. 2017 from Safe Guide 2017 Activity Planning and Safety Management Nov 18/17 -Original filing - The Girl Guides Safe document – our written resource for all activities is not password protected so here is the link to the 180 page document. The forms are password protected – permission from parents, health form , float plan, documentation of training and quals for leaders and training of participants. If useful, I can send these as documents. - Margaret Harper
Guest issues Team member health and welfare Critical Incident Debrief Meeting with Recovery Response Team Schedule within 30 days of the incident. Discuss and document the following items: What key lessons were learned because of this incident and during the recovery process? What changes do we need to make to our business processes to mitigate this type of incident from happening again? Evaluate the team members and Property Management Team’s initial response to the incident. Is any retraining that is needed? Rate the quality of communication as the critical incident was happening and during the recovery process. Rate the timeliness of the communication during the recovery process: Did the Recovery Response Team meet within the first 24 hours of the incident occurring? Did the Recovery Response team have a final debrief meeting within 30 days of the incident? If not, is a date set for this final debrief meeting? Were all of the appropriate persons/parties in the loop during the recovery process and were they communicated with timely? Rate the quality of the recovery process itself. What went well? What did not go well? Who was responsible for the recovery process checklist and was it being utilized properly during the process and through completion? Was the cleanup/rebuild/renovation work completed timely? Was the cleanup/rebuild/renovation work completed in a quality manner? Was the hotel able to adequately perform daily operations as usually during the recovery operations? If not, what could have been improved? Insurance process. Was the incident report filled out fully and timely? Were quality and quantity of pictures Was the adjuster contacted timely? Did the adjuster show up timely? Did the adjuster provide quality and timely communication? Using the information learned in this debrief, the Regional Vice President - Operations needs to ensure company policies and procedures are updated accordingly to help improve and prepare for any future emergencies.
Date first completed: Compiled by: Date reviewed: Reviewed by: Risk treatment register (part two) Use one row per risk. Work your way across, left to right. Add more rows if you need to (Main menu bar > Table > Insert > Rows Below). This summary is based on your analysis of each risk in the Risk Register (stage one). Risk in priority order from the risk register Possible treatment options - Available options - More research needed to create new options? Preferred options Choose what to do: A = accept option/s R = reject option/s Who will implement option/s By when? Who will monitor this risk and its treatment? Further action Risk # 1: Priority B No for more than a day This is an example: you can delete it after reading it or leave for reference 1. Fix generator 2. Buy second generator 3. Investigate better insurance 4. Research exactly how long food for in fridges and freezers without power 5. Simply shut down to cut losses and claim on insurance 6. Set up an agreement with another store 7. Improve fridge insulation 1. 3. 4. 6. 1. = A 3. = A 4. = A 6. = R Jerry 21/12/2012 Elaine - Take generator in - Contact broker - Talk to manufacturer or industry association?
[The risks below are examples and not meant to be an exhaustive list – consultation with stakeholders and others experienced in risk management will help ensure you have considered the risks comprehensively. Add and remove as appropriate for your event. WHAT COULD GO WRONG? RISK (Anything which can prevent the event from being conducted safely.) POTENTIAL CONSEQUENCE (The case scenario consequence if the risk were to occur.) LIKELIHOOD RATING (Rare, Unlikely, Possible, Likely, Almost Certain, from above.) CONSEQUENCE RATING (Insignificant, Minor, Moderate, Major or Catastrophic, from above.) OVERALL RISK RATING (Low, Moderate, High, Extreme, from above.) PREVENTATIVE ACTION (what can you do to reduce the chance of the risk taking place?) RESPONSIVE ACTION (what should you do if the risk takes place?) Participant hit by vehicle during road crossing Significant injury unlikely Major High Brief guides & participants before and ensure that crossings on the route have lights Call ambulance. Ensure guide has working mobile phone. Trip hazards Cuts and scrapes Possible Minor Medium Encourage participants to wear sensible walking shoes; check route in advance for possible hazards Ensure guide carries small first aid kit Power failure Participant suffers from heat (heat exhaustion)
There must be at least 1 mobile phone linked to a functioning network carried by the group leader. Risk assessment must ensure appropriate levels of staffing for adequate supervision. In the event of disciplinary problems requiring a student to be returned home, the Registered Manager must be informed. In the event of an emergency, medical or otherwise, the House/School Activity Organiser should take advice from the Activity Centre where appropriate and inform House Registered manager/Education Manager. If the emergency is serious the Registered Manager will follow the companies Notification Procedure under Ofsted Regulation 40. All groups going on an activity from school are required to complete an ‘Out of School’ activities form, which must include the names of the teachers and pupils going on the activity. Copy is to be left in the main office and a copy carried with the group. If a group outing becomes unduly delayed the leader is to notify the House Manager/Education Manager so that Carers/Parents can be notified and given along with expected return details. External Activity Providers Private providers are vetted and are required to supply up-to-date DBS checks, Risk Assessment and Certificate of Public Liability for our records. 3 Dimensions staff will work with risk assessments supplied by providers. 3 Dimensions works closely with its providers to ensure all users’ safety whilst enjoying the activity. It may be necessary to implement more specific risk assessment regarding the activity identifying each individual’s challenges (please see assessment for further 3 Dimensions prepare, Personal Risk Assessments & Generic Activity Risk Assessments which jointly should cover most activities with a young person. Further to this we have a format to assess the need for an Activity Risk Assessment, (see end of this document ). This format helps the staff member easily identify if a further risk assessment should take place before the activity is undertaken with the specific young person or is sufficiently covered by a generic risk assessment, or if the activity is provided by an independent provider, that we have the provider’s current RA and public liability certificate.
Risk Rating: Risk Rating: 5 Risk: Source: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk Rating: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk Rating: 6 Risk: Source: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk Rating: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk Rating: [Add more rows as required] Approved by Signed [Insert name, title, date of approval] Table 2 : Risk Management Plan – WHS Risks (Refer to the NOTES when completing this Plan) Project name Hazard # WHS hazard Risk associated with the hazard Impact Initial risk rating (Before treatment strategies in place) Risk treatment strategies Risk owner & timeframe Action Will the WHS risk be eliminated or minimised SFARP through the Action ? If no, further risk treatment strategies to eliminate or minimise SFARP the WHS Risk
1 Consequence: Likelihood: Risk Rating: Yes No 2 Consequence: Likelihood: Risk Rating: Yes No 3 Consequence: Likelihood: Risk Rating: Yes No [Add more rows as required] Approved by Signed [Insert name, title, date of approval] anagement Pan Except WHS RisksNOTES NOTES Table 1 – Risk Management Plan Except WHS Risks To complete the Plan:
Environmental - Minor and reversible effect on physical environment - Moderate short term effects on project environment. - No impacts on ecosystem services - Serious medium term environmental impacts. - Serious long term impairment of the environment and surrounding ecosystem functions. - Very serious long term impairment of the environment and surrounding ecosystem functions. Legal - Minor non-compliance with funding agreement and breaches of regulation. - Breach of Applicant protocols. - Serious breach of regulation involving investigation by or reporting to authority with prosecution powers - Potential for moderate fine - Breach of funding agreements and conditions. - Major breach of funding agreement or relevant legislation/regulations. - Breach incurring significant prosecution, with potential for significant fines. Likelihood of risks Applicants should consider the likelihood of a risk arising Table 4 below. 4 : Likelihood of risks Category Example of Qualitative Measures Almost Certain The event is expected to occur in most circumstances Likely The event will probably occur in most circumstances Possible The might occur at some time Unlikely The is not expected to occur in most circumstances Rare The will only occur in exceptional circumstances
Source: Likelihood: Risk Rating: Likelihood: Risk Rating: 5 Risk: Source: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk Rating: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk Rating: 6 Risk: Source: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk Rating: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk Rating: [Add more rows as required] Approved by Signed [Insert name, title, date of approval] Table 2 : Risk Management Plan – WHS Risks to the NOTES when completing this Plan) Project name Hazard # WHS hazard Risk associated with the hazard Impact Initial risk rating (Before treatment strategies in Risk treatment strategies Risk owner & timeframe Action Will the WHS risk be eliminated or minimised SFARP through the Action ? If no, further risk treatment strategies to eliminate or
minimise SFARP the WHS Risk 1 Consequence: Likelihood: Risk Rating: Yes No 2 Consequence: Likelihood: Risk Rating: Yes No 3 Consequence: Likelihood: Risk Rating: Yes No [Add more rows as required] Approved by Signed [Insert name, title, date of approval] anagement Pan Except WHS RisksNOTES NOTES Table 1 – Risk Management Plan Except WHS Risks To complete the Plan:
Probability High – Greater than <70%> probability of occurrence Medium – Between <30%> and <70%> probability of occurrence Low – Below <30%> probability of occurrence Impact Impact H M L L M H Probability High – Risk that has the potential to greatly impact project cost, project schedule or performance Medium – Risk that has the potential to slightly impact project cost, project schedule or performance Low – Risk that has relatively little impact on cost, schedule or performance Risks that fall within the RED and YELLOW zones will have risk response planning which may include both risk mitigation and a risk contingency plan. Quantitative Risk Analysis Analysis of risk events that have been prioritized using the qualitative risk analysis process and their affect on project activities will be estimated, a numerical rating applied to each risk based on this analysis, and then documented in this section of the risk management plan. Each risk (those falling in the Red & Yellow zones) will be assigned to a project team member for monitoring purposes to ensure that the risk will not “fall through the cracks”. For each risk, one of the following approaches will be selected to address it: Avoid – eliminate the threat by eliminating the cause Mitigate – Identify ways to reduce the probability or the impact of the risk Accept – Nothing will be done Transfer – Make another party responsible for the risk (buy insurance, outsourcing, etc.) For each risk that will be mitigated, the project team will identify ways to prevent the risk from occurring or reduce its impact or probability of occurring. This may include prototyping, adding tasks to the project schedule, adding resources, etc. For each major risk that is to be mitigated or that is accepted, a course of action will be outlined for the event that the risk does materialize in order to minimize its impact. The level of risk on a project will be tracked, monitored and reported throughout the project lifecycle. A “Top 10 Risk List” will be maintained by the project team and will be reported as a component of the project status reporting process for this project.
Concerns and Missing Information items in the proposed Australian PI and CMI should be included in the table. How risk minimisation activities will be implemented in Australia – suggested format Safety Concerns or Missing Information Risk minimisation activities (routine and additional) proposed in the EU RMP Risk minimisation activities (routine and additional) proposed for Australia Differences between EU and Australian activities with justification Item 1 Routine activities Include exact wording for EU SmPC statements proposed for this safety concern Routine activities Include exact wording for Australian PI statements proposed for this safety concern If routine and/or additional activities differ for Australia from that proposed in the EU RMP, provide justification for these differences. Additional activities Include details of additional activities to be undertaken for this safety concern in the EU Additional activities Include details of additional activities to be undertaken for this safety concern in Australia. Item 2 … … … Potential for medication errors or other risks if applicable Ensure you include Australian information (if available) on the potential for medication errors or other risks, for example: if an extension of indication or new dosage form is proposed. How risk minimisation activities will be evaluated in Australia. Provide detail about how and when evaluation of additional risk minimisation activities, including educational activities, will be undertaken and reported to the TGA. You must demonstrate that the measures used to mitigate risk are working and, if not, what actions will be taken to ensure effectiveness.
Likely - The event will probably occur in most circumstances Major - Extensive injuries, major financial loss Almost Certain - The event is expected to occur in most circumstances Catastrophic - Death, huge financial loss Appendix 3 – Risk Analysis - level of risk Likelihood Consequences Insignificant (minor problem easily handled by normal day to day processes) Minor (some disruption possible) Moderate (significant time/resources required) Major (operations severely damaged) Catastrophic (business survival is at risk) Almost Certain (e.g. >90% chance) High Risk High Risk Extreme Risk Extreme Risk Extreme Risk Likely (e.g. Moderate Risk High Risk High Risk Extreme Risk Extreme Risk Moderate (e.g. 10%-50% chance) Low Risk Moderate Risk High Risk Extreme Risk Extreme Risk Unlikely (e.g. between chance) Low Risk Low Risk Moderate Risk High Risk Extreme Risk Rare (e.g. <3% chance) Low Risk Low Risk Moderate Risk High Risk High Risk
pertinent to your business) Swimming Pool Drowning Slippery Surfaces Skylarking (Example of some typical policy/procedures for swimming You may use the suggestions listed below, amend or add your own) The owners/managers are committed to the safe and responsible use of the park’s swimming pool and surrounding area The swimming pool area is fully fenced according to government regulations All gates leading into the pool area are sanctioned child proof locks and self-closing Signage demonstrating CPR (Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation) techniques and emergency numbers are prominently displayed according to government regulations Slippery surface signage is prominently displayed at the entrance of the pool and within the pool area Signage is prominently displayed relating to the rules of the pool, which are: No glass bottles or glass receptacles in the pool area No running, diving or dive bombing is permitted Children must be supervised by an adult who can swim Any behaviour by guests that the park owners/managers deem to be anti-social or disruptive (skylarking) will not be tolerated and offenders asked to leave the pool area Children’s play areas Injuries sustained by falls/ equipment misuse or failure/ of children (Example of some typical policy/ procedures for children’s play areas. You may use the suggestions listed below, amend or add your own) The owners/managers are committed to the safe and responsible use of the park’s children play area All play area equipment complies to the standards relevant by state and local authorities fill or synthetic rubber is used in play areas to minimise the impact of falls and/or impact in landing areas (such as slides) or areas where a fall may occur Supervision by an adult is required for any children using the areas Signage is erected in a prominent area displaying the of improper use of the play area equipment Misuse of equipment may result in people being removed from the play area, continuous disregard for the rules may result in eviction from the park with no refund Walkways and Roads Slip hazards/ potholes/ overhanging branches (Example of some typical policy/ procedures for walkways and roads. You may use the suggestions listed below, amend or add your own)
This policy shall evolve by review by the Risk and Audit Committee and the Board from time to time as may be necessary. This Policy will be communicated to all vertical/functional heads and other concerned persons of the Company. . This Policy may be amended or substituted by the RMC or by the Board as and when required and also by the Compliance Officer where there is any statutory changes necessitating the change in the policy. However, no such amendment or modification will be binding on the Directors and employees unless the same is communicated in the manner described as above
2: Determine the consequence rating for a risk scenario CONSEQUENCE / IMPACT Consequence Level Financial, Legal, Commercial Cash loss People Business Continuity Environmental and the Community Political, Reputation or Brand Extreme Above $20m Loss of life Critical service loss for more than one month Substantial part or of University unable to operate Long term and severe harm Major loss of reputation/loss of confidence by media/public International/national media coverage Parliamentary enquiry/loss of Govt/Minister’s support Administrators appointed High $10m - $20m Permanent impairment or disability Critical service loss for more than a week and up to one month Several areas of the university unable to operate Significant harm Significant loss of reputation Loss of stakeholder support Major complaints by stakeholders on program management Extended national/local media coverage Ministerial attention: matters reported in Parliament/Departmental oversight Significant public concern raised Medium $2.5 - $10m Temporary impairment or disability causing significant loss of time from work/studies Critical service loss for more than a day and up to a week Several areas of the university disrupted Moderate harm Student and or community concern Significant complaints about programs Inability to provide quality and consistent service Adverse and sustained local media coverage Decrease in support from Government or stakeholders Low $0 - $2.5m Minor injury or illness causing limited loss of time from work/studies Local only, service loss for up to a day Transient harm Issue raised by students and/or local press Minor complaints about programs resolved locally Performance concerns resolved by Vice-Chancellor
Examples of Risk Budgetary control Fraud and theft Loss of grants/funding – student numbers declining Foreign exchange losses Conflict of interest Non-compliance with legislation Litigation threats Intellectual property theft Marketing and competition Contractual obligation failure Public health crisis Workplace accident Criminal or negligent act causing injuries Loss of staff knowledge Inability to recruit or retain staff Inadequate communication, training and development Lack of system integrity Poor continuity planning Failure to repair and maintain buildings - risk of fire, flood & power interruption Poor project and contract management Chemical hazards Poor environmental health and safety Breakdown of community and stakeholder relationships Changes to Government policy Adverse media coverage Reputation and goodwill Quality management Curriculum development Research activities Equal opportunity Brand image
Risk Response Category: Reduce the chance of the threat occurring or reduce impact of threat should it occur Risk Response: Each junction improvement will have a defined agreed by the Board. Any change will be subject to the Board approval and Change Control process. This will enable risks or opportunities relating to time, cost and quality to be quantified and assessed by the Board before any change decision. Date Registered: 26th June 2017 Risk Author: Gary Peacock Risk Owner: Richard Lewis Project Manager Risk Actionee: Project Manager Risk Status: Active RISK REGISTER Version: Bid Programme Name: West of England Combined Authority Traffic Signal Enhancement Project Name: Programme Level Risk Identifier: 006 Risk Description: Statutory Undertaker lead to delays Risk Category: Project Probability: Impact: Expected Value: Proximity: Delivery Pre-Response 5 Post-Response 2 Pre-Response 7 Post-Response 6 Pre-Response 35 Post-Response 12 Risk Response Category: Reduce the chance of the threat occurring or reduce impact of threat should it occur