zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Return to Work Coordination and Management Managers, Supervisors and Return to Work Coordinators will receive training on the practices and principles of managing return to work. This includes the specific mandate that has with regards to supporting successful and safe return to work. The training will review the Return to Work process and how it relates to address the needs of a worker who is suffering from PTSD. Orientation The PTSD awareness and anti-stigma training as well as the policies and procedures related to PTSD hazard recognition, reporting and interventions will be incorporated into the new employee orientation program. Post Exposure Education and Awareness Education and awareness will be offered to those who have experienced a traumatic event. This education will focus on providing information about signs and symptoms, how to access care if needed and provision of contact information if they require assistance and/or resources. Training Roll-Out Plan and Documentation You may want to highlight your specific training plan and program roll out in this section. Documentation Outline how your training program documentation currently works in your organization These training programs will be documented and will become a permanent part of the employees record. Screening Protocols and Early Intervention Screening Protocols Customize this section to reflect your organizations intervention and screening protocols. recognizes that early intervention is important for the effective treatment and prevention of PTSD. The severity of the initial traumatic event will be considered when determining the need for early intervention. Screening protocols have been developed and implemented to help identify workers who are potentially at risk for developing PTSD. For workers who have been exposed to a traumatic event will implement screening 1 month following the event, utilizing the process outlines below.
the use of digital technology, develop local capacity and skills, enable early contractor and supply chain involvement, promote fairer payment and improve the whole life cycle approach to cost and carbon reduction. 4. Framework Fees Framework Providers will be required to pay a Framework Subscription Fee to the Council to support and facilitate the administration of the Framework. The Framework Subscription Fee has been set in accordance with the estimated annual value of fees to be procured under the Lots, and will support local initiatives, which currently include the Build East Sussex and Build Surrey networks. Included in the Framework Subscription Fee will be the opportunity to exhibit at Build Events at no cost to the Framework Providers. The current annual fee structure is as follows: Lot Annual Cost Lot 1 Service Providers £6,000 Lot 2 Service Providers £3,000 Lot 3 Service Providers £1,000 Lot 4 Service Providers £1,000 Lot 5 Service Providers £1,000 Lot 6 Service Providers £3,000 Lot 7 Service Providers £1,000 Lot 8 Service Providers £1,000 Lot 9 Service Providers £1,000 In addition to the above Framework Subscription Fees, there will be a requirement for Framework Providers to pay fees to support the current system that the Council uses for managing and monitoring Service Provider performance (the KPI Hub), which is an external website hosted by the IBI Partnership. The current Service Provider fees for the KPI Hub are set out below: Project value band - from Project value band - to £ per project £ initial purchase of credits £0 £99.9K 10 100 £100K £249.9K 20 200
Bidder E Rank 5 Bidder J Rank 4 Bidder F Rank 6 Bidder K Rank 6 Bidder G Rank 7 Bidder L Rank 7 Bidder H Rank 8 Bidder M Rank 8 Bidder N Rank 9 Bidder O Rank 10 Bidder P Rank 11 Bidder Q Rank 12 Bidder R Rank 13 Bidder S Rank 14 15. PQQ Selection Criteria (a) Constructionline PQQ Document Questionnaire Questions Scoring Mechanism / Criteria Notes Table 1 - Qualification Documents/Questionnaires Constructionline PQQ Document – Module C1 - Supplier Identity, Key Roles and Contact Information C1-Q1 to C1-Q9 in blue, plus additional ESCC questions 1 to 2.1 in red Information only – must be completed Important Notice: This section captures key information about the main contact on behalf of the Bidder’s organisation for this Procurement. Constructionline PQQ Document – Module C2 - Financial Information and Insurance Requirements Finance C2-Q1-1 to C2-Q1-5 in blue Insurance C2-Q2-1 to C2-Q2-3 in blue Pass/Fail Important Notice: The financial information provided in this section is used to assess Bidders financial suitability for the delivery of the Framework. Following this assessment, the Lead Authority reserves the right to exclude from this Procurement any Bidder deemed to be financially unsuitable to deliver the Framework. Details of the Lead Authority’s process for financial assessment is shown under 18 of this PQQ Guidance.
PTSF Site Survey Education and Credentialing Report This report must cover a 12-month period. Start date: ___________________End date: ______________________ Educational hours may be prorated based on employee start date. NURSING UNIT # of RNs # of RNs > 1 year in department # Completed PTNCC % Completed PTNCC # meeting required hours of annual con-ed % with meeting required hours of annual con-ed # of RNs > 2 years in department # with ACLS % with ACLS # of RNs > 3 years in department # of RNs with Advanced Certification % of RNs with Advanced Certification Emergency Department Intensive Care Unit Intensive Care Step-Down Unit Medical/Surgical Floor Other Unit Other Unit Operating Room PACU Social Work Case Management Comments Total # of RN’s with ACLS/PALS/Advanced Certification may include the true total number and not just those with more than 2 or 3 years in the departments.
Harborside Academy PTSO Membership Form Parent/Guardian Name: _____________________________ Contact phone: ________________ Parent E-mail: _________________________________________________________________ Student’s Name(s): _____________________________________Student’s Grade(s): ________ Student’s Name(s): _____________________________________Student’s Grade(s): ________ Student’s Name(s): _____________________________________Student’s Grade(s): ________ Please check the activities that you are interested in: Dance Chaperone:________ Assist with various dance throughout the year as needed and fits into your schedule. Phone Callers: Assist making phone calls for activities as needed _____ Fundraising Committee:_______ Help with developing and coordinating fundraising activities throughout the year Volunteer Help as need: _____ Signature: _____________________________________ Any questions, please free to call: Carrie Greskoviak 262-652-1315 or Mr. Haithcock (262) 359-8400
Transport PMV Train Bus Flight Ferry Other Escort Date form Date to Type Approved Not approved PTSS Accommodation Commercial Private / Family Transport PMV Train Bus Flight Ferry Other PTSS approval (or delegate) I authorise that this travel / accommodation is medically required. Name Signature Date Financial delegate approval I authorise that this travel / accommodation is medically required. Name Signature Date PTSS not approved: provide reason for non-approval Office use only Facility / Unit record number Vendor number PTSS application number Notes
To develop a research guideline for CT (probably based on Japanese protocol). Issue of plus minus to be addressed. Make recommendation on how to convert trial data into a treatment schedule. Dohino (lead), Quenta, Cant, Hattingh Ongoing Draft presented to PTTEG (PMRG) PMRG to revise the document (intersession). Tentative final agreement at next PMRG meeting Explore the possibility of developing generic cold treatments for pests species and\or hosts species. Hallman (lead), Jeon, Park, Willink, Myers, Jessup On going Draft presented to PTTEG (PMRG) Review literature; develop a publication for review by PMRG. *Pending collection of CT information New Research Issues Development of Controlled Atmosphere Temperature Treatment System (CATTS) treatments research guideline Notes: to include commodity type and treatment type (w/ or w/o CATTS) Neven (lead), Verschoor, Qiu, Mathieu-Hurtiger Next PMRG meeting Document (“guidelines”) Modelling for more rapid development of quarantine treatments (physiological determination - host and insect) Neven (lead), Qiu, Mike Ormsby (to confirm) Next PMRG meeting Discussion paper to next PMRG meeting Treatments approach to researchers: Heat treatments Hallman, Dohino Next PMRG meeting Draft document to be presented to next PMRG meeting Treatments approach to researchers: fumigation Walse, Grout, Myers, Naito/Dohino Next PMRG meeting Draft document to be presented to next PMRG meeting Treatments approach to researchers: controlled atmosphere Neven, Verschoor Next PMRG meeting Draft document to be presented to next PMRG meeting Revision of phytosanitary systems used and accepted by regulators published Moore (lead), Manrakhan, Neven, Walse, Willink, Cant Next PMRG meeting Draft document to be presented to next PMRG meeting Larvae vs pupae vs adult endpoint determinations Neven, Hallman, Gazit, Manrakhan *Notes: pending literature review
Mixed loads - Different species and different varieties in same shipment: how to treat? (air movement and cooling distribution effects) Cant (lead), Quenta, Myers, Walse Next PMRG meeting Draft document to be presented to next PMRG meeting Other treatments, e.g. low/high pressure, microwave Neven (lead), Qiu Next PMRG meeting Draft document to be presented to next PMRG meeting New regulatory issues Heat treatments and non-target organisms (mealybugs, mites / tropical fruits) – indicators for the treatment effectiveness Wilson (lead), Guy Next PMRG meeting Draft document to be presented to next PMRG meeting New issues in commercial application (None identified)
Permitted Treating Veterinarian Applicant’s Details Name Surname Date of Birth Nationality Gender Email Phone No. Mobile No. Address Education and Registration I graduated from (vet school and country) Year of Graduation National Veterinary Regulatory Body Character References (one must be an FEI Official Veterinarian) Name Name Email Email Phone No. Phone No. Declaration (tick the boxes if true) Through my signature, I confirm that: I understand English, both written and spoken I am a licensed veterinarian in the country of my NF I have read and understood the current version of the I acknowledge and accept the FEI Code of Conduct (first section, FEI Veterinary Regulations) I acknowledge and accept the PTV Codex (Annex III, FEI Veterinary Regulations) I have read and understood the current version of the I am aware of the and the I understand that I will obtain the title of PTV only after having passed the PTV online exam The information provided in the present application is correct and true Date Applicant’s Signature Please return your filled in and signed application form to your National Federation. Contact details can be found in the under National Federations.
Chairman, Disciplinary Committee/ Equipment and Uniforms/ Clinics Mike Revette VP Softball Marc Davis League Treasurer Fund Drive Coordinator/ Asst. Secretary/ Equipment and Uniforms Sandra Neglia Player Agent Administrator, Sponsors & Trophies/ Scheduler, Umpires/ Administrator, Clinics Amanda Jusino League Secretary & Information Officer Registration & Volunteer Websites Elena Fletcher Safety Officer Equipment and Uniforms/ Softball, Assistant to VP Board Members Name Official Title Email Director, T-Ball Mike Dana Director, Farm League Baseball/ Field Maintenance Director, Minor League Baseball/ Trainer, Umpires Rich Japko Director, Major League Baseball/ Scheduler, Batting Cages Dave Hutchinson Softball, Assistant to VP Stephen Revette Refreshment Stand / Softball, Assistant to VP Tom Sloan Equipment & Uniforms, Assistant/ Softball, Assistant to VP Jerry Vecchia Director, Equipment & Uniforms Director, Field Maintenance Nicole Beadle Refreshment Stand/ Complex Assistant Casey Maass Refreshment Stand/ Special Events Brant Brisson Webmaster - PTWLL website Manager, Social Media
Minimum Sanctions for Coaches Infraction Directed Toward Consequence(s) Use of alcohol Within the park during game or practice or other league or team event where players are present. Ejection from park 1 game suspension PAYS certification Use of illegal substances Same as above Minimum of 1-year suspension PAYS certification Interference with the conduct of the game Resulting in a stoppage of play Warning Interference with the conduct of the game - 2nd offense Same as above Ejection from field or park PAYS certification Knowingly requiring or allowing a player to play while having a serious injury. Suspension for the season Foul, or abusive language or excessive arguing with an umpire. A player, coach, official, or spectator Ejection from game and from field or park 1 game suspension Pays certification Foul of abusive language - 2nd offense Same as above Ejection from game and from field or park Up to 1-year suspension PAYS certification Allowing or encouraging foul, abusive, or threatening language or behavior by players. Same as above Ejection from game and a 2-game suspension Threatening gesture or language Same as above Ejection from field or park Up to 1-year suspension from attendance and participation PAYS certification Death threat and/or language Same as above Ejection from field or park At least 1-year suspension Pays certification Striking or bodily assault in any threatening fashion Same as above Ejection from field or park Minimum 1-year suspension from attendance and participation PAYS certification Striking or bodily assault - 2nd offense Same as above Lifetime suspension All disciplinary issues will be reviewed by the PTWLL Safety and Disciplinary Committee
Bus and/or buses must have space availability for the student. Student riders must utilize existing buses, routes, stops, and schedules only. Student riders may not transfer from bus to bus. Waivers are approved for the period requested not to exceed the school year. Waivers are applicable only for the approved student, buses, routes, schedules, and stops. “Bus passes” are not authorized for use on district school buses at any time. Approval Process: Waiver applications are reviewed and approved/disapproved by a Transportation Committee based on space availability and appropriate criteria. For waivers submitted during the summer through the first four (4) full weeks of school, please see the table below: Northwest St Johns County Northeast St Johns County Central St Johns County South St Johns County Waiver Decision Timeline By third (3rd) full week of school By third (3rd) full week of school By one (1) week prior to school start By one (1) week prior to school start Effective Date for Approved Waivers By fourth (4th)full week of school By fourth (4th) full week of school First (1st) day of school First (1st) day of school Note: Space availability on school buses is lowest in Northwest and Northeast St Johns County. Transportation requires the first month of school to determine actual ridership by eligible student riders and redistribute student loads across buses. Accordingly, Transportation will approve/disapprove waivers and allow students with approved waivers to ride in accordance with the timeline outlined in the table above. For waivers submitted during the school year (after the first four (4) weeks of school), Transportation will review and approve/disapprove waivers within five (5) business days. Approved waivers are effective upon receipt by applicant. Contingencies: Parents/guardians are encouraged to make alternative transportation arrangements until when/if waiver applications are approved by Transportation. Parents/guardians are encouraged to develop contingency plans for transportation services in the event waiver applications are not approved by Transportation. Waiver Suspensions:
Fundraising Strategy Map Key message (Why?) Purpose Our PTA is passionate about supporting the school to deliver a well-rounded experience for pupils. Goals Library seating £1,200 Playground markings £2,950 KS2 history workshop £360 Target £4,510 Outcome drivers (How?) Revenue Increase target for Christmas card scheme Apply for grant Seek sponsors Costs Seek donations Negotiate free glass hire for events Support base (Who?) Existing supporters Survey parents - which events would they like us to run? Demonstrate value of PTA funds to encourage support Encourage people to join our Facebook group New supporters Run an sponsored event online to extend reach of donors Leaflet drop neighbours of the school inviting them to events Action Fundraising activity Term 1: Quiz night (adults) Term 1: Film night (children) Term 1: Christmas fair (all) Term 1: Christmas cards Term 2: Mother’s Day shop Term 2: Grant application Term 2: Race night (adults) Term 3: Ice pop Fridays Term 3: Summer fair (all) Term 3: Disco (children) Communication plan Monthly update via school newsletter – investments and value to pupils Update details of events on school website and social media Create media release to local paper about the circus coming to the summer fair Resources (What do we need?) People Appoint marketing coordinator Seek someone with previous grant bid-writing experience Start recruiting new Treasurer for next year Knowledge Create storage structure for filing feedback forms from previous events Handover/training for new Treasurer
PTC EDGE Application Thank you for your interest in Pittsburgh Technology Council’s 12-month EDGE Leadership Development Experience. This experience is geared toward mid-career women leaders who seek to develop their “next level” leadership in a supportive and engaging environment. The PEER Technology® of EDGE leverages coaching, interaction and exchange to deliver superior results. As such, PTC and Align Leadership will look at candidates holistically to evaluate both what they will gain from the experience, and also what they offer to the experience. The selection process is designed to bring together a unique, diverse cohort group across the generations to maximize every participant’s learning potential. In order to be considered for the Fall 2016 EDGE Cohort, please complete as much of this application as possible and return it via e-mail no later than July 28th, 2016 to Justin Driscoll, along with a copy of your most recent resume. If you have any questions, please email Justin at . Instructions: Please complete all require fields (marked with an *) and complete as many of the optional fields as you choose. Because we look at the whole of our applicant’s background, life and work experience, education and personal essays, we appreciate when you are willing to share the rich details of your life. You may save and/or print when finished. E-mail your completed application to . You will be sent a confirmation email once your application has been received. Part I - Contact Information *First Name: *Last Name: Preferred Name: *Company: *Title: Amount of time at your Current Employer: Amount of time in your Current Position: Company Mailing Address: *Home/Work Phone: Ext: Cell Phone: *Home Mailing Address: *Email Address: *Emergency Contact: *Emergency Contact Phone: Relationship of Contact: *Human Resources Contact Name and Title: *HR Contact Phone: Ext: *HR Contact Email: Your Supervisor: Phone/Email: Part II - Supplemental Information
Member Tuition: $7,500 for the 12-month PTC EDGE Experience. (Non-Member: $9,600) Tuition includes the pre-program assessment, all EDGE materials and instruction, availability to sign up for monthly executive coaching hours, and lunches and refreshments during all in-person sessions. Tuition is subject to change and is payable in advance upon confirmation of registration. Payment Options: Cancellation Policy: Prior to the launch of EDGE, we incur substantial administrative costs related to your registration. Therefore, the following fees apply: Days Prior to Launch Session Cancellation Fee Substitutions Allowed More than 30 days None Yes (no additional fee) 15 – 30 days 50% of Fees Yes (no additional fee) Less than 14 days 100% of Fees No
Referral for Plan Management Provider Services Participant Details Date: Full Name Date of birth Address Contact details Phone number: Email address: NDIS Number Plan start / end date Date of agreed service commencement Participant bank details (if required): Account name: Bank branch: BSB number: Account number: Service Required Financial Intermediary Services (PMP) Financial & service intermediary activities ($ – per hour) Set Up Costs ($ - Once) Financial intermediary monthly processing ($ – per month) Total funded in plan: $ PLEASE ADVISE IF YOU WISH TO APPROVE EACH INVOICE BEFORE PROCESSING YES NO Preferred contact details of participant: Primary Contact Is this person the plan nominee for this participant? YES NO Name Relationship to participant (If applicable) Address Contact phone number Email address Special considerations Yes No Budget items/supports for Plan Management: NDIS Plan Breakdown CORE SUPPORTS Assistance with daily living $ Travel & Transport (mobility allowance) $ Consumables $ Assistance with social & community participant $ NDIS Plan Breakdown CAPITAL SUPPORTS Assistive Technology $ Home Modifications $ NDIS Plan Breakdown CAPACITY BUILDING SUPPORTS Improved Life Choices $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ Support Coordinator Contact Details: (if funded for this support category) Contact person Contact organisation Contact phone number Contact email Contact address Bank details Account name: Bank branch: BSB number: Account number: Service Provider Details: Service provider name Contact phone number Contact name Email address Address Bank details Account name: Bank branch: BSB number: Account number: Service Provider Details: Service provider name Contact phone number Contact name Email address Address Bank details Account name: Bank branch: BSB number: Account number: Service Provider Details: Service provider name Contact phone number Contact name Email address Address Bank details Account name: Bank branch: BSB number: Account number: Other Information: How did you hear about Pathway’s to Care Plan Management Provider Service? Flyer Pathways to Care Website Referred by a service provider Existing PTC participant NDIA or LAC recommended Social Media Word of mouth Other: Request completed by: ________________________________________________ Date: Please return completed copy to: or PO Box 153 BLACKBURN 3130
e.g. mixing glue, debarking, peeling off the veneer heating, cooling or reacting e.g. adding the hardener, steam preconditioning logs, drying the veneer, hot pressing plywood sheets together. The learner describes how processing operations change for different grades, thicknesses and uses. describing the role of tests in processing operations and how processing operations and tests can be combined in a processing sequence For example the learner describes: how samples are subjected to boiling, pressure, resonance and sonic tests how a shear test is conducted to check the strength of the glue how visual tests are carried out to grade for appearance how the moisture content is tested during the drying process. The above expected learner responses are indicative only and relate to just part of what is required. the veneer, hot pressing plywood sheets together. The learner explains: how steam preconditioning ensures the right moisture content to facilitate peeling; the process of cross graining and the benefits (e.g. reduced splitting, improved stability, consistent strength). explaining the importance of tests in processing operations and why operations and tests are combined in a processing sequence For example the learner explains: how the veneer sheets are clipped to size but if on checking for appearance, may be clipped to a smaller size. The above expected learner responses are indicative only and relate to just part of what is required. veneer heating, cooling or reacting e.g. adding the hardener, steam preconditioning logs, drying the veneer, hot pressing plywood sheets together. The learner compares and contrasts: different conditioning treatments for logs; different bonds of glues and how they are used for different applications; loading a block on the lathe manually or by using a laser scanner; clipping the veneer before or after drying; how the optimum moisture content (and associated testing) for gluing depends on the species, density of veneer and gluing procedures. discussing the relationship/s between processing operations, tests, and outcomes required For example the learner discusses: how the gluing process and testing changes for different uses. For example, aviation plywood must be processed to particular specifications, which calls for shear testing after immersion in boiling water. The above expected learner responses are indicative only and relate to just part of what is required.
Creating Folders Folders allow you to quickly file your references under different topic headings. You can drag and drop references from your library onto the folder name in the left panel to add that reference to a folder. You can also create folders within existing folders. Adding References There are many ways to add references to Mendeley. Drag and Drop a PDF to get the full-text and the complete record* Copy & Paste the PMID into the PMID field using the “Add Entry Manually” option to get a complete record* Copy & Paste the DOI into the DOI field using the “Add Entry Manually” to get a complete record* Use the Web Importer “bookmarklet” that’s on your browser to get a complete record* Type in a record manually using the “Add Entry Manually” option Sync Syncing is a core concept in Mendeley. Whenever you make changes in Mendeley, you’ll need to sync in order to push those changes up into cloud storage. It’s a good idea to sync regularly to ensure that your documents and annotations are saved in the cloud. Search Your Documents Mendeley offers a powerful search tool to help you to locate items in your library. Just enter your search term in the field which appears in the top right corner and Mendeley will filter your current view to show references which contain that term. It will also search within the full text of PDF papers which appear in your library.
Joseph Talbot, 28 Mrs. Kragen Reading—The Phantom Tollbooth worksheet 30 September 2016 1. An “allegory” is a story or picture that uses symbols (The American Heritage Dictionary). In The Phantom Tollbooth, Milo is a symbol of kids. Tock is the symbol for adults. A humbug is a fraud, a fake, someone who brags but isn’t telling the truth, and that’s what the Humbug is. Rhyme and Reason are old-fashioned ways of talking about two different ways of thinking; Rhyme is the creative and imaginative side of thinking, and Reason is the logical and analytical side of thinking. No wonder Rhyme and Reason together can solve all problems! 2. The Official Which is Faintly Macabre. She lives in the dungeon because many years ago she had the job of choosing the words to use. She wanted to keep more words for herself, so she chose fewer and fewer words for people to use (67-70). 3. Six idioms used for comic effect in the Royal Banquet are: a light meal eating your words a square meal dig in a half-baked idea Out of the frying pan into the fire. Don’t bite off more than you can chew.
STUDENT INJURY REPORT PERSONAL INFORMATION: X STUDENT________________________E#: HOME PHONE CELL PHONE/WORK PHONE NAME: ADDRESS (STREET & NO.) CITY / STATE ZIP CODE EMAIL ADDRESS NAME OF PROGRAM / DEPARTMENT ☐ AT ☐ OT ☐PA ☐ PT ☐NURSING ☐PHARMACY ☐RESPIRATORY CARE ☐UNDERGRAD PROGRAM X GRADUATE PROGRAM ☐CERTIFICATE PROGRAM YEAR IN STUDY: ☐1ST☐2ND ☐ 3RD ☐4TH INCIDENT / DAMAGE DETAILS: COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR PERSONAL INJURIES: PRIMARY BODY PART AFFECTED RIGHT or LEFT ☐☐HEAD ☐☐NECK ☐☐SHOULDER ☐☐ARM ☐☐ELBOW ☐☐WRIST ☐☐HAND ☐☐FINGER(S) ☐☐CHEST ☐☐HIP ☐☐LEG ☐☐KNEE ☐☐ANKLE ☐☐FOOT ☐☐TOE(S) ☐☐OTHER SEVERITY OF INJURY ☐ NO REPORTED INJURY ☐ MINOR FIRST-AID ☐ SEVERE ☐ DISABLING . CAUSE OF INJURY (BE SPECIFIC) ☐ OBJECT (MACHINERY) ☐EQUIPMENT / TOOLS ☐HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE ☐NEEDLE STICK ☐BODY FLUID EXPOSURE ☐FALL ☐OTHER________________ TREATED BY ☐EMERGENCY ROOM ☐PRIMARY CARE PHYSICIAN ☐ OTHER_Urgent Care ☐REFUSED TREATMENT LOCATION / ADDRESS OF INJURY ADDITIONAL BODY PART(S) AFFECTED: No DESCRIPTION OF INJURY: WITNESS OF INCIDENT REMARKS and NAME(s): CLINICAL SUPERVISOR’S REMARKS NAME____________________________________________DATE: 2/19/15 REPORT COMPLETED BY: PHONE: EMAIL DATE REPORTED TIME REPORTEDAMPM E-MAIL COMPLETED REPORT TO Melissa Cloyd, MPA | Information Research Technician II / Clinical Education Information Coordinator cloydmc@etsu.edu | Phone: 423.439.8707 A copy of this form is kept by the program in the student’s file and sent to the Dean of CCHRS.
P. 331 [Subscript a in Table 11.7.2]. Table 11.7.2. Optimal Fits of RDU for Data in Table 11.7.1 under Various Restrictions for Eqs. 11.7.1 and 11.7.2 Restrictions Assumed (for U) w(0.5) W(Ba) distance from data ambiguity aversion EU for Risk (-maxmin) 0.75 0.50* 0.38 2.25 0.12 RDU for risk with U() = 1* 0.41 0.31 0.81 0.10 RDU in general 0.95 0.42 0.32 0.57 0.10 Note: * assumed; bold print: fitted Pp. 334-335 [Distance in §11.8]. The distance to determine best fits is the distance measure described in Appendix A (and used throughout the book). P. 343 [Typos in lowest displayed formula]. jU(xj) = (EiEi1 ... E1)U(xi) + (EjEj+1 ... En)U(xj) = (W+(Ei ... E1) W+(Ei1 ... E1))U(xi) + (W(Ej ... En) W+(Ej+1 ... En))U(xj), P. 347 [Typo in unnumbered formula and below]. W+(E)(u()u(2)) = (1W+(E))(u(1)u(0)) W+(E)(u()u(2)) = W(E)(u(0)u()) .
P. 470. Di Mauro, Camela & Anna Maffioletti (2002) “The Valuation of Insurance under Uncertainty: Does Information Matter?,” Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory 26, 195–224. P. 461:. Abdellaoui, Mohammed (2000) “Parameter-Free Elicitation of Utilities and Probability Weighting Functions,” Management Science 46, 1497–1512. P. 470. Easterling, Richard A. (1995) “Will Raising the Incomes of All Increase the Happiness of All?,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 27, 35–48. P. 470. Epstein, Larry G. & Jiangkang Zhang (2001) “Subjective Probabilities on Subjectively Unambiguous Events,” Econometrica 69, 265–306. P. 482:. Nakamura, Yutaka (1992) “Multi-Symmetric Structures and Non-Expected Utility,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 36, 375–395.
P. 483:. , Joep Sonnemans, Gijs van de Kuilen, & (2009) “A Truth-Serum for Non-Bayesians: Correcting Proper Scoring Rules for Risk Attitudes,” Review of Economic Studies 76, 1461–1489. P. 487:. Seo, Kyoungwon (2009) “Ambiguity and Second-Order Beliefs,” Econometrica 77, 1575–1605. P. 491:. Winkler, Robert L. (1991) “Ambiguity, Probability, and Decision Analysis,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 4, 285–297. P. 493 2nd column:. Easterling, Richard A. 158, 468, 470 P. 499 2nd column middle: Wu, George, Richard 134, 204, 209, 215, 217, 228, 230, 275, 292, 298, 351, 352, 360, 474, 491
Epper, Thomas, Helga Fehr-Duda, & Adrian Bruhin (2011) “Viewing the Future through a Warped Lens: Why uncertainty Generates Hyperbolic Discounting,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 43, 163–203. Gurevich, Gregory, Doron Kliger, & Ori Levy (2009) “Decision-Making under Uncertainty A Field Study of Cumulative Prospect Theory,” Journal of Banking & Finance 33, 1221–1229. L'Haridon, livier & Laetitia Placido (2010) “Betting on Machina's Reflection Example: An Experiment on Ambiguity,” Theory and Decision 69, 375–393. Hey, John D., Gianna Lotito, & Anna Maffioletti (2010), “The Descriptive and Predictive Adequacy of Theories of Decision Making under Uncertainty/Ambiguity,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 41, 81–111. The reference “Johnson, Cathleen (2008) in preparation” turned into: Johnson, Cathleen, Aurélien Baillon, Han Bleichrodt, Zhihua Li, Dennie van Dolder, & Peter P. Wakker (2015) “Prince: An Improved Method for Measuring Incentivized Preferences,” mimeo. van de Kuilen, Gijs & (2011) “The Midweight Method to Measure Attitudes toward Risk and Ambiguity,” Management Science 57, 582–598. Zauberman, Gal, B. Kyu kim, Selin A. Malkoc, & James R. Bettman (2009) “Discounting Time and Time Discounting: Subjective Time Perception and Intertemporal Preferences,” Journal of Marketing Research 66, 543–556. replaces Zauberman, Gal, James R. Bettman, & Selin Malkoc (2005) “Time Horizon Neglect: Prospective Duration Insensitivity in Intertemporal Choice,” . (Langer joined as a co-author) Zeisberger, Stefan, Dennis Vrecko, & Thomas Langer (2012) “Measuring the Time Stability of Prospect Theory Preferences,” Theory and Decision 72, 359–386.
Online Course Grading Online course grades are based on two summative assessments (typically a final exam and final project) and three graded unit exercises (found in Units 2, 4, and 6). Summative assessments are worth 440 points each. The three graded exercises are worth 40 points each (120 points total). Course grades are calculated as follows: Assignment Point value Summative Assessment (Final Exam) 440 Summative Assessment (Final Project) 440 Unit 2 Graded Exercise 40 Unit 4 Graded Exercise 40 Unit 6 Graded Exercise 40 Total 1000 A minimum grade of D (600/1000 points or 60%) is required for an online undergraduate student to pass a course and for the course to count toward the degree. The final course grade is determined by the percentage of all points earned from graded assignments. Students who receive less than 60% (264/440 points) on either summative assessment are afforded a second attempt if time remains in the term. Second attempts on the three graded unit assignments are not permitted. The minimum Cumulative GPA (CGPA) required to earn a baccalaureate from Patten University is 2.0. For graduate students, a minimum grade of C (700/1000 points or 70%) is required to pass a course and for the course to count toward their degree. The final course grade is determined by the percentage of all points earned from graded assignments. Students who receive less than 70% (308/440 points) on either summative assessment are afforded a second attempt if time remains in the term. Second attempts on the three
Ability to comprehend, interpret and prepare a variety of documents such as utility bills, tax statements, dog and cat license applications; NSF notices, special assessments, tax rolls, invoices, letters and other correspondence, using prescribed format and conforming to all rules of punctuation, and grammar. Ability to communicate effectively with customers, department and other City personnel, vendors, and other government agencies, to convey or exchange information including receiving instructions from supervisors. Ability to use and interpret accounting terminology. Environmental Adaptability Work is performed in an office environment. Additional hours are required during tax collection. The City of West Bend is an Equal Opportunity Employer. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City will provide reasonable accommodations to qualified individuals with disabilities and encourages both prospective employees and incumbents to discuss potential accommodations with the employer. ______________________________ _________________________ Employee's Signature Date ____________________________ __________________________ Supervisor's Signature Date ______________________________ __________________________ Human Resources Director Date Revised: 10/31/18
bypass examinations. Appeals limited to the final course grade, which may be upheld, raised, or lowered at any stage of the appeal process. Any recommendation to lower a course grade must be submitted through the Executive Vice President/Provost to the Faculty Assembly Grade Appeals Committee for review and approval. The Faculty Assembly Grade Appeals Committee may instruct that the course grade be upheld, raised, or lowered to a more proper evaluation. 17. Tentative Schedule: (Calendar, Topics, Assignments) May 30 Introductions – posted on Discussion Board (by June 1) Discuss course requirements Guidelines for Casebook Assignments Read Chapter 1 Milakovich and Gordon Read (Only) Classics of Public Administration - Case 1 and 2 Discussion Board Questions (by March 3th) June 6 Read Chapter 2 and 3 Milakovich and Gordon Blackboard Assignment Discussion Board and Video Review Schafritz and Hyde’s Casebook Assignments 5 and 11 Spring Break (March 12 - 16, 2018) June 13 Read Chapter 4 and 5 Milakovich and Gordon Discussion Board and Video Review Casebook Assignments 15 and 16 Mid-Term posted in Assignment section (Due June 27, 2018) Outline of the research paper due June 20 Read Chapter 6 Milakovich and Gordon Discussion Board and Video Review Casebook Assignments 23 and 29
WAYLAND BAPTIST UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF BEHAVIORAL & SOCIAL SCIENCES VIRTUAL CAMPUS UNIVERSITY MISSION STATEMENT Wayland Baptist University exists to educate students in an academically challenging, and distinctively Christian environment for professional success and service to God and humankind. COURSE NUMBER & NAME: PUAD 5309 VC01 - Emergency Services Management TERM: Winter, 2018 INSTRUCTOR: Dr. Juan M. Gonzalez CONTACT INFORMATION: Office phone: N/A WBU Email: juan.gonzalez@wayland.wbu.edu Cell phone: 210-347-6445 OFFICE HOURS, BUILDING & LOCATION: Virtual; please send me an email if you want to schedule a phone conference COURSE MEETING TIME & LOCATION: Virtual CATALOG DESCRIPTION: Introduction to the fundamentals of emergency services management and an examination of the roles and responsibilities at the national, state, and local levels in preparing for, mitigating, responding to, and recovering from a natural or man-made incidents.
PUAF 670 Fall 2014 Class Schedule Class Date Topic (s) Assignment 01 Sep. 8 Introduction: Fundamental Principles of Public Finance Read: Mikesell Chapter 1 & Reading Packet (Class 1) For Discussion: Case 1-1 02 Sep. 15 The Logic of the Budget Process (Executive and Legislative Branches) Read: Mikesell Chapter 2 & Reading Packet (Class 2) For Discussion: Case 2-1 Homework Due: Problem 1 (pg. 35) 03 Sep. 22 Federal Budget Structures and Institutions State and Local Budgets Read: Mikesell Chapters 3 & 4, including Appendices 3-1 & 4-1, & Reading Packet (Class 3) For Discussion: Case 3-1 Homework Due: Problems 2 & 3 (pgs 84-85) 04 Sep. 29 Budget Methods and Practices Introduction to Present Value Calculations (Handout Present Value Problem Set) Read: Mikesell Chapter 5 and OMB Circular A-11, Sections 22, 25 and 51 () For Discussion: Appendix 5-1 Homework Due: Problem 2 (pg. 143) 05 Oct. 6 Budget Classifications Systems & Reform: Trying to Make Better Choices Read: Mikesell Chapter 6, including Appendix 6-1 For Discussion: Case 6-1 & Reading Packet (Class 5) Homework Due: Problem 2 (pg. 220) and Case 5-1 06 Oct. 20 Capital Budgeting, Time Value of Money, and Cost-Benefit Analysis: Process, Structure and Basic Tools First Exam (Out-of-Class) Read: Mikesell Chapter 7 & Reading Packet (Class 6) For Discussion: Case 7-1 and Handout Homework Due: Present Value Problem Set 07 Oct. 27 Taxation: Criteria for Evaluating Revenue Options Major Tax Structures: Income Taxes Read: Mikesell Chapters 8 and 9 For Discussion: Cases 8-1 and 9-1 08 Nov. 3 Major Tax Structures: Taxes on Goods and Services Property Taxes First Exam Due Read: Mikesell Chapters 10 and 11 For Discussion: Problem 11 (pg. 533 & Cases 10-1 & 11-2 Homework Due: Problems 2 (pg. 385), 3 (pg. 434) & 7 (pg 435) 9 Nov. 10 Revenue from User Fees, User Charges, and Sales by Public Read: Mikesell Chapter 12 & Reading Packet (Class 9)
22 April – 15 July 2017 TIMETABLE (Course 4) WEEK 1 Sat 22 APR Mon 24 APR Wed 26 APR 10.00-5pm 6.30-9.30pm 6.30-9.30pm INPUT INPUT INPUT WEEK 2 Mon 01 MAY Wed 03 MAY Fri 05 MAY Bank Holiday 6.30-9.30pm 6.30-9.30pm NO INPUT INPUT INPUT WEEK 3 Mon 08 MAY Wed 10 MAY 6.30-9.30pm 6.30-9.30pm TP TP WEEK 4 Sat 13 MAY Mon 15 MAY Wed 17 MAY 10.00-5pm 6.30-9.30pm 6.30-9.30pm INPUT TP TP WEEK 5 Sat 20 MAY Mon 22 MAY Wed 24 MAY 10.00-5pm 6.30-9.30pm 6.30-9.30pm INPUT TP TP WEEK 6 Sat 27 MAY Mon 29 MAY Wed 31 MAY 10.00-5pm 6.30-9.30pm 6.30-9.30pm INPUT TP TP WEEK 7 Mon 05 JUN Wed 07 JUN 6.30-9.30pm 6.30-9.30pm INPUT INPUT WEEK 8 Mon 12 JUN Wed 14 JUN 6.30-9.30pm 6.30-9.30pm INPUT INPUT WEEK 9 Mon 19 JUN Wed 21 JUN 6.30-9.30pm 6.30-9.30pm TP TP WEEK 10 Sat 24 JUN Mon 26 JUN Wed 28 JUN 10.00-5pm 6.30-9.30pm 6.30-9.30pm INPUT TP TP WEEK 11 Sat 01 JULY Mon 03 JULY Wed 05 JULY 10.00-5pm 6.30-9.30pm 6.30-9.30pm INPUT TP TP WEEK 12 Mon 10 JULY Wed 12 JULY Sat 15 JULY 6.30-9.30pm 6.30-9.30pm 10.00-5pm TP TP INPUT NB Observation of ‘live’ classes (4 hours) can be arranged in the day time Monday to Friday, or (1.15 to 3.15) or Mon/Wed evenings, from (6.30 – 8.30). This happens twice on the course during weeks 4/ 5 and 7/8. TP=Teaching Practice
Fear of nearly any contact with police, so run avoid many places (Goffman Ch. 2) Net of Police Entrapment to serve warrants & look for parole & probation violators (why young men run & change their routines & relationships) – Police check many places (hospitals, funerals, jobs, home, etc.) & people (family & friends) to search for those with warrants for arrest (most of which are low level offense and unpaid fines & fees). Those with warrants and those on parole or probation fear police contact & avoid such – e.g., going to hospital for treatment or calling police when victimized. (Goffman Ch. 2) Balt. Police use of “Terry Frisk” / Search as limit on 4th amendment rights, & police work difficulties in Baltimore poor, African American neighborhood & how this might influence residents’ views of police (Moskos, 2) Labeling (often unfair, discriminatory, &/or inaccurate ) & leads to Cycle of negative interactions between Latino teens & police (& schools – less ed than containment/control) – leads top harsh treatment by authorities and resistance by kids (leading to more harsh treatment). Tragic case of Tonyo… (Rios Ch. 1 & 2) Vs. Liquor Store Owner as more empathetic & understanding & respectful (& protective / supportive) of troubled Latino teens, which in turn leads them to react much more positively… (Rios Ch 2) Lack of empathy & understanding increasingly hostile relations with authorities See also Group Discussion Q’s / Issues to consider (many covered in class, but not all.)
PLIEGO DE BASES Y CONDICIONES PARTICULARES Pág. 31 de 32 ESPECIFICACIONES PESA PARA VERIFICACION CLASE E2. 200GR PESA PARA VERIFICACION CLASE E2. 1KG CANASTO RECTANGULAR DE ACERO INOXIDABLE CON MANIJA PARA ESTERILIZAR MATERIAL DE LABORATORIO. REFRIGERANTE (PIEZAS SUELTAS) PRESENTACIÓN: CAJAS POR 1500 UNIDADES MARCA TERMAL INSULATE-SYSTEM CAT 406J. LATAS PARA TRANSPORTE DE VACUNA, MATERIAL HOJALATA CON CUBIERTA SANITARIA, CAPACIDAD 4 LTS, SIN MANIJA. Observaciones del ítem: Observaciones del ítem: Observaciones del ítem: Observaciones del ítem: Observaciones del ítem: Especificación técnica: Cantidad Cantidad Cantidad Cantidad Cantidad U. Medida U. Medida U. Medida U. Medida U. Medida Descripción Descripción Descripción Descripción Descripción Cód. Catálogo Cód. Catálogo Cód. Catálogo Cód. Catálogo Cód. Catálogo PESAS; MATERIAL ACERO INOXIDABLE - PESO 200GR -. PESAS; MATERIAL ACERO INOXIDABLE - PESO 1Kg -. CANASTOS; MATERIAL ACERO INOXIDABLEUN - DIMENSION 24 X 45 X 25Cm - CAPACIDAD 27L -. REFRIGERANTES; TIPO C/GEL - USO P/HELADERA PORTATIL - CAPACIDAD 120/150CM3 - PRESENTACION SACHET -. RECIPIENTES METALICOS; MATERIAL HOJALATA - DIAMETRO 16,8Cm - ALTURA 20Cm -. 1,000000 1,000000 4,000000 3.000,000000 1.000,000000 UN UN UN UN UN 198 199 200 201 202 NO NO NO NO NO
Generalist EC-6/Core Subjects 89.80% 67.4 93 79.1 91.1 66.5 100 No Data Available 100 No Data Available History 8-12 92.90% 55.3 70.3 56 88.2 60.8 100 No Data Available 100 No Data Available LOTE: French 50% 48.9 n/a 56 n/a 37.1 n/a No Data Available n/a No Data Available LOTE: Spanish 42.90% 46.3 50 56 100 47.1 n/a No Data Available 100 No Data Available Life Science 8-12 100% 49.9 100 56.3 100 41.9 n/a No Data Available 100 No Data Available Mathematics 4-8 100% 73.6 100 71.2 100 73.5 100 No Data Available 100 No Data Available Mathematics/Science 4-8 90.50% 73.5 96.2 75.7 0 73.5 100 No Data Available 100 No Data Available Mathematics 8-12 85.70% 54.3 88 54 100 76.4 100 No Data Available 100 No Data Available Music EC-12 100% 82.3 100 80.2 94.6 82.9 100 No Data Available 100 No Data Available Pedagogy and Professional Responsibilities EC-12 98.60% 90.2 97.4 91.3 97.7 92.8 97.9 No Data Available 100 No Data Available Physical Education EC-12 100% 85.9 97.7 84.2 95 81.8 100 No Data Available 100 No Data Available Physics/Mathematics 8-12 100% 78.6 100 73.5 n/a 77.2 n/a No Data Available n/a No Data Available Principal 90% 76 87.5 75.5 100 75.3 100 No Data Available 91.7 No Data Available Reading Specialist 100% 98.3 n/a 98.8 100 100 n/a No Data Available n/a No Data Available
Audit Risk Assessment Were audit risk assessment matrixes used to describe the risk(s)? If yes, were the matrixes sufficient? __Yes __No Why not: Why not: __Yes __No Was audit risk assessment used to determine when to audit this area? __Yes __No Why not: Was audit risk assessment used to determine the scope of the audit? __Yes __No Why not: Is the audit risk assessment of this area adequate? __Yes __No Why not: Audit Work and Findings Were the audit program and procedures sufficient? __Yes __No Describe the deficiencies: Were audit procedures performed to ensure compliance with applicable a. policies? b. procedures? c. plans? d. laws and regulations? __Yes __No __NA __Yes __No __NA __Yes __No __NA __Yes __No __NA Were internal controls for the area sufficiently detailed? __Yes __No Did the audit contain tests of administrative or operational a. controls? b. policies? c. procedures? __Yes __No __Yes __No __Yes __No Did the audit note the root cause of deficiencies or symptoms of problems? __Root cause __Symptom __Both __NA Was a review of pertinent MIS performed as part of the audit? __Yes __No __NA Why not:
What is the quality of the procedures documentation? a. Are audit trails sufficient? __High __Acceptable __Unacceptable Support: __Yes __No Why not: How well does the audit describe the risk represented in individual findings or groups of findings? __Well __Acceptable __Unacceptable __NA Support: If the area or unit is internally rated satisfactory, how well does the audit mitigate the existence of significant findings? __Well __Acceptable __Unacceptable __NA Support: Were all exceptions or weaknesses in the audit work papers noted in the final audit report? __Yes __No __NA Why not: Were the internal auditors (in-house or outsourced), including third parties, adequately qualified to complete this program? __Yes __No How determined: How well does the auditor in charge support the final audit rating? __Well __Acceptable __Unacceptable __NA Support: Do you agree with the final rating? __Yes __No __NA Why not: Were any horizontal or silo emerging or systemic risks identified during the audit review? Should there have been? If yes, was the information appropriately addressed, discussed, and reported in a reasonable time frame to the fullest extent possible across the enterprise? __Yes __No Explain: __Yes __No Why not: If automated testing or continuous auditing was used, was its use independent, appropriate, and effective? __Yes __No Explain: Sampling Did the auditor use statistical sampling? Was the population accurately defined and justified by the auditor? Was the selection of the sampling method disclosed? Were the sample selection techniques disclosed? Were sample evaluation and reporting results criteria established? __Yes __No __NA __Yes __No Why not: __Yes __No Why not: __Yes __No Why not: __Yes __No Why not: