zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
2. Cost Breakdown of Technical Feasibility Study A. Personnel Any changes to the hourly rate must be substantiated though a change in the employment contract. Name: Role in Project: Type of Role : Technical Competency: Specify: From to Hourly Rate: € Number of hours: From to Hourly Rate: € Number of hours: From to Hourly Rate: € Number of hours: Role in Study: € Name: Role in Project: Type of Role : Technical Competency: Specify: From to Hourly Rate: € Number of hours: From to Hourly Rate: € Number of hours: From to Hourly Rate: € Number of hours: Role in Study: € Name: Role in Project: Type of Role : Technical Competency: Specify: From to Hourly Rate: € Number of From to Hourly Rate: € Number of From to Hourly Rate: € Number of hours: Role in Study: € Name: Role in Project: Type of Role : Technical Competency: Specify: From to Hourly Rate: € Number of hours: From to Hourly Rate: € Number of hours: From to Hourly Rate: € Number of hours: Role in Study: € Total Personnel Costs €
B. Acquisition of Knowledge / Intellectual Property. Provider: Description: Reason why it is relevant to the project: € 0.00 Provider: Description: Reason why it is relevant to the project: € 0.00 Provider: Description: Reason why it is relevant to the project: € 0.00 Acquisition of Knowledge/Intellectual Property Costs €
Reporting operational problems or violations of directives to the Research Office within 30 days of occurrence or detection, unless R&D Committee determines that a report has been previously filed by the PI. Reporting confirmation of Serious or Continuing Non-compliance to the ACOS R&D within 2 working days of the determination. Reporting confirmation of Serious or Continuing Non-compliance to the ORO within 5 working days of the determination. Forwarding minutes of R&D Committee through the Research Office to the medical Director. Ensuring that timely reports are submitted to external Offices and Officials, e.g. VISN22, ORO, NIH, etc. as is described in the SOP for Reporting of Research Events to Institutional Officials and External Oversight Offices. 21. REFERENCES a. Title 38 CFR §16. b. VHA Handbook 1200.05. c. VHA Handbook 1200.06. d. VHA Handbook 1200.7. e. VHA Handbook 1200.8. f. VA Directive 6500 and its implementing handbooks in the 6500 series. g. VHA Handbook 1605.1. h. VA Directive and Handbook 6102. i. VA Directive 6502. j. VA Handbook 6502.1. k. VA Handbook 6502.2. l. VHA Directive 6300. m VHA policy concerning Research Financial Conflict of Interest Statement. n. VHA Handbook 1200.13. o. VHA Handbook 1100.19. p. VHA policies concerning Credentialing of Health Care Professionals.
Ability to take/use initiative Flexibility Numeracy and literacy skills Desirable Computer experience in relevant Desk Top Publishing software package - Adobe Illustrator. Knowledge of the local area and local transport network Commitment to learning and self-development Ability to understand and interpret timetable information Driving licence
Rachel Carson Trails Conservancy 2018 TRAIL CREW FORM Return this form to the Trail Crew Leader(s) for each Trail Crew event that you can volunteer to work: The Baker Trail: pabrunner2@yahoo.com Name: Permanent Address: Email Address: Over 18? Telephone: Mailing Address: Mobile: ( ) - Other: ( ) - Use this address until this date: Adult T-Shirt Size PROJECTS: Each maintenance event’s schedule is listed below. You can always leave early and attend only a day or two, but we do request that you arrive at the start time to get the safety orientation, equipment, and general description of the activity. Please check each event that you would like to attend. Letting us know helps us to plan for tools and number of crew leaders. Title Dates Description GPS Address Mahoning Trail Building June 26 Check in 6pm June 25 – July 1 Work Days 9am-4pm Clearing, building, and blazing 2 miles of new trail at Mahoning Creek Lake Park Creek Bend Campground 140 Creek Bend Ln. New Bethlehem, PA 16242 Fisher Station Maintenance July 15 9am – 4pm Routine pruning, clipping, blazing, and mowing 123 Reddinger Hollow Rd, Mayport, PA 16240 Little Mahoning Maintenance July 28-29 9am – 4pm Routine pruning, clipping, and blazing 114 Milton Loop Campground Ln, Dayton, PA 16222 Redbank to Zion Road Aug. 11-12 9am – 4pm Routine pruning, clipping, blazing, and mowing Redbank Trail at Strausser Rd 41.089515, -79.180881 Work Crew Various (3 or 4 times in the summer) Road blazing and touch up work Contact Dewaine Beard to be on a mailing list to get notified a few days prior when the weather is looking good! 1. Have you been involved in other trail maintenance projects? Yes No If yes, please list the following information. Trail Organization Year Location Type of Project 2. Please indicate if you have any experience in performing trail work. Using a chain saw Using loppers for brush cutting Using a hand saw Painting trail blazes Using a power brush cutter Building bridges or structures
Key evaluation questions Describe how this Regional Delivery project will ensure that evaluation questions will be addressed in a timely and appropriate manner. Impact: Effectiveness: Efficiency: Appropriateness: PART 3 Sustainable Agriculture Stream 3.1 – A set of soil management indicators will be provided to each NRM Region based on information compiled through the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Rural Environment and Agricultural Collection Survey (REACS). This information will assist Regional NRM Organisations to prioritise their activities and assess performance over time. Each Sustainable Agriculture sub project should carefully consider how its activities increase productivity and/or improve the quality of ecosystem services delivered to the broader community through using these indicators. 3.2 NOTE: Complete a separate for each Sustainable Agriculture Regional Delivery sub-project to be delivered. Sub-project name REF: Project Location Spatial Information to be updated at reporting period. Description DESCRIBE THIS PROJECT IN YOUR OWN (150 OR LESS) Project outputs, assumptions and monitoring 5 Year Outcome (choose those that apply) Total Project Output – total to be delivered by end of project. Statements Delivery mechanisms, assumptions and rationale – How is the output to be delivered (i.e. briefly describe the method to be used)? What assumption(s) is/are being Monitoring - How will the progress, achievement and impact of the Project Output be monitored? Data and
should be SMART. NOTE: Each Project Output should be linked to only one 5 year Outcome. made about how the output will be achieved, and how it will lead to the achievement of the Project Outcome? What evidence is there to support the assumption? information collected will assist in evaluating progress toward the Project Outcome(s) Increase the percentage and area of farming entities that have adopted sustainable land management practices to increase productivity and improve the quality of ecosystem services delivered to the broader community from their land, whilst building their resilience to climate change Delivery Mechanism Assumption and rationale Increase the percentage of fishing and aquaculture entities that have adopted sustainable and low environmental impact management practices to increase productivity Delivery Mechanism Assumption and rationale Increase the number and area of farming and fishing entities that have trialled innovative practices for improved Delivery Mechanism Assumption and rationale
Person Specification Job Title DPO Senior Research Scientist Job Holder VACANT Reports To Name of Line Manager Date June 2017 Essential Desirable Method of Assessment E1 D1 Educational Attainment Relevant science/ engineering undergraduate degree Relevant science/ engineering postgraduate Masters-level degree X X Application form/Certificate Application form/Certificate E2 D2 D3 E3 D4 D5 D6 Work Experience A graduate with a relevant degree and approximately 4-6 years relevant (protein purification) laboratory experience. Experience working safely and in accordance with local Safety, Health and Environmental polices (SHE) and COSHH To have awareness, understanding and experience working within a cGMP environment Working knowledge of Microsoft Office Experience working with pilot-and /or downstream processing operations Application of bioinformatics to characterise and predict protein structure and form Experience with line and laboratory management X X X X X X X Application form Application form Application form/Interview Application form Application form/Interview Application form/Interview Application form/Interview E4 E5 E6 E7 Knowledge/Skills/Aptitude Excellent written and verbal communication skills An In-depth theoretical and practical knowledge of Biochemistry, Cell Science, Protein Purification, Biochemical Engineering and associated analytical techniques. An in-depth working knowledge of the key unit operations implemented in Downstream Process Operations e.g. buffer preparation and formulation, precipitation and clarification, refolding and solubilisation, dead-end and depth filtration, chromatography, ultrafiltration and diafiltration. Ability to perform and teach laboratory calculations (e.g. molarity, use of formula X X X X Application form/Interview Interview Application form/Interview Interview
The twenty DRGs with the highest volume x cost-weight (“cost-weighted separations”) in 2012/13 These DRGs are those that account for the highest proportion of total costs in the private overnight sector. Cost-weighted separations are calculated as the total number of separations multiplied by the cost weight. The percentage distribution of cost-weighted separations represents the percentage distribution of hospital costs incurred in delivering patient care. The top 3 DRGs that account for the highest proportion of hospitals incurred in 2012/13 are: I04B “Knee Replacement W/O Catastrophic Or Severe Cc” representing 135,355 cost weighted separations (4.9%), cost weight of 5.50, and average length of stay of 5.7 days; I03B “Hip Replacement W/O Catastrophic Cc”, representing 122,186 cost weighted separations (4.4%), cost weight 6.54, and average length of stay 6.0 days; and I09B “Spinal Fusion W/O Catastrophic Cc”, representing 81,805 of cost weighted separations (3.0%), cost weight 8.35, and average length of stay 6.1 days. Combined, these 3 DRGs represent 339,346 cost weighted separations which is 12.3% of total cost weighted separations of 2,753,670. Therefore, these 3 DRGs alone account for 12.3% of total hospital costs in 2012/13. Nineteen of this year’s top-20 DRGs were ranked in the top 20 in 16, indicating that the DRGs accounting for a significant proportion of total hospital costs in 2012/13 also accounted for total hospital costs in 2011/12. Overall, this group of DRGs accounts for 33% of total hospital costs in 2012/13, 25% of total separations, and 21% of total patient days.
Table 8 DRGs with the twenty highest number of cost-weighted separations, AR-DRG 6.0x, Round 17 (2012/13) Notes: DRGs with fewer than 5 separations or 3 participating hospitals are excluded from the above table. (b) Separations shown are weighted using the methodology described in Section 3.5 (e) ALOS means average length of stay
EDUCATION/QUALIFICATIONS Essential Desirable E1. Masters degree in a subject recognised as criminology, criminal justice or criminal investigation in there is an explicit forensic investigation element. E2. Recognised teaching qualification or willingness to undertake. D1. PhD in a subject recognised as criminology, criminal justice or criminal investigation, in which there is an explicit forensic investigation element. D2. Active membership of a relevant professional body. KNOWLEDGE/ SKILLS Essential Desirable E3. Ability to instruct students in a wide range of modules in criminology, criminal justice and forensic investigation, including having knowledge of evidence types associated with specific crimes. E4. Knowledge of the legal framework related to forensic investigation and policing. E5. Knowledge of the criminal justice and penal systems, legal and governance practices and policies, and crime statistics. E6. Ability to teach crime theories including classical, biological and psychological. E7. Knowledge of the processes involved in offender profiling, offender management, penology and offender rehabilitation. E8. Ability to teach the study of white-collar and corporate crime. E9. Ability to teach the study of drug and alcohol-related crime. E10. Ability to relate to the requirements of the forensic regulator in terms of investigation approaches and professional conduct, and to embed within teaching and learning. E11. Ability to teach and relate to a wide range of students and subjects from Foundation Year to Masters level. E12. Ability to conceptualise and direct research projects at both undergraduate and postgraduate levels E13. Recent teaching experience at Higher Education level with evidence of successful student learning outcomes with evidence of good/innovative pedagogic practice. D5. Ability to teach Green Criminology and Environmental Crime Investigation including Wildlife Crime and Legislation associated with. D6. Ability to teach forensic psychology. D7. Ability to teach forensic/criminal investigation in the laboratory and/or through practical simulation. D8. Experience of acting in a Professional Capacity through involvement in scene work, case work or as an Expert Witness.
e. What training or skills development activities would support progress with your research programme over the next 12 months? You should consider both research and generic skills development would support both your research programme and your future career aspirations. For information regarding the skills and attributes associated with successful researchers you should refer to the UK Vitae Researcher Development Framework PART C – DIRECTOR OF STUDIES COMMENTS C1. General Comments by Director of Studies (to be completed by the DoS once the information in Part B has been discussed with the student) Please include a brief assessment of the student’s overall quality and performance. Where issues have been raised above or targets have not been met please provide a summary of how these will be addressed. C2. Have the student’s requirements/expectations for training and development been discussed and an appropriate development plan been put in place? C3. Are the existing supervisory arrangements for the student adequate? – If No please indicate the proposed changes in the supervisory team and the briefly state the reasons for the change. Please note that any such changes must be notified separately to the Doctoral Academy via an Application for Change in Supervisory Arrangements RD9Sup - C4. Has the need for ethical approval been discussed with the student and a plan put in place for obtaining ethical approval (if required)? C5. Is the student on track to complete their target award within the maximum registration period permitted under the University’s Research Degree Regulations?
Introduction The purpose of this document is to provide advice and information and to outline the rules governing the procedures to be followed for The Henry Granjon Prize Competition. Purpose of the Competition The Henry Granjon Prize Competition is an annual international competition among authors of papers devoted to research into welding technology or a related subject. The purpose of this Competition is to stimulate interest in welding and allied processes among young people. Eligibility To be eligible for the Competition, original scientific papers (theses, research reports, state-of-the-art surveys, etc.) must not have been previously published, and must be based on recent work carried out at a University or an equivalent educational institution, or in industry. This work must either form part: of a Master’s or Doctoral Degree project, or, of an industrial project at an equivalent technical Scope The work must fall within one of four main categories of technology related to joining, surfacing or cutting: - Category A: Joining and Fabrication Technology This category covers more specifically: Flame welding processes Arc welding processes Physics of the heat source (e.g. arc, laser) Prediction of heat source behaviour and weld zone shape Power sources for arc welding Thermal cutting Surfacing Welding robots Brazing and soldering Joining processes for plastics and ceramics Organization of welding plants. - Category B: Materials Behaviour and Weldability This category covers more specifically: Test methods for assessing weldability
Email CANDIDATE INFORMATION Full Title Prof. Dr Eng. Please tick one or various choices Mr Mrs Ms Last name First name Address Country Email REQUIRED ELEMENTS In this part are the 4 required elements that must be provided. Don’t miss to attach letters of recommendation. SUMMARY OF CONTRIBUTIONS 2 pages maximum - Based on the criteria listed in - section 3 … (please type here) LIST OF PUBLICATIONS Including books, book chapters, scientific and technical papers, and scholarly works
LIST OF RECOGNITION FROM IIW AND OTHER PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES … (please type here) LIST OF PRESENTATIONS MADE AT TECHNICAL CONFERENCE Keynote or invited presentations should be highlighted … (please type here) LIST OF CONSULTANCIES … (please type here) LIST OF PARTICIPATION AS ORGANIZER IN TECHNICAL PROGRAMMING CONSULTANCIES … (please type here) LIST OF ADVOCACIES … (please type here) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION … (please type here)
Session 1 8.00am warm up, 9.00am 101 4 x 50M Boys 12 year old and under Freestyle relay 102 4 x 50M Boys 13 year old and over Freestyle relay 103 4 x 50M 12 year old and under Medley relay 104 4 x 50M Girls 13year old and over Medley relay 105 200IM Boys 106 200M Freestyle Girls 107 50M Freestyle Boys 108 50M Freestyle Girls 109 100M Butterfly Boys 110 100M Butterfly Girls 111 50M Backstroke Boys 112 50M Backstroke Girls 113 100M Breaststroke Boys 114 100M Breaststroke Girls Session 2 Warm up and TBA 201 4 x 50M Girls 12 year old and under Freestyle relay 202 4 x 50M Girls 13 year old and over Freestyle relay 203 4 x 50M Boys 12 year old and under Medley relay 204 4 x 50M Boys 13year old and over Medley relay 205 200IM Girls 206 200M Freestyle Boys 207 50M Butterfly Girls 208 50M Butterfly Boys 209 100M Freestyle 210 100M Freestyle Boys 211 50M Breaststroke Girls 212 50M Breaststroke Boys 213 100M Backstroke Girls 214 100M Backstroke Boys 215 8 x 50M Mixed cannon
Month Number of FOIs received Of new FOIs received number and % responded to within 20 working days Number of FOIs received in the month which are still outstanding Total number of FOIs responded to during month Number % May 2017 27 20 74% 0 22 June 2017 29 19 66% 0 38 July 2017 43 16 37% 0 20 August 2017 43 23 53% 0 32 September 2017 29 17 59% 0 50 October 2017 40 32 80% 0 48 November 2017 26 21 81% 0 36 December 2017 24 24 100% 0 34 January 2018 27 26 96% 0 30 February 2018 22 22 100% 0 14 March 2018 17 17 100% 0 24 April 2018 24 23 96% 0 16
DO YOU NEED TO INFORM SAFEGUARDING? Part G: Quality & Standards 19. Quality checklist YES [ ] NO [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] Does the plan clearly indicate how restrictions placed on the individual are being monitored and evaluated? Is the plan reviewed with the patient and where appropriate family/carers to ensure it is working? Are records being kept up to date that enable you to see if the plan is working and restrictions are being reduced safely over time? If the plan is not helping or the person is facing increased restrictions is this being proactively raised with senior professionals involved in the person’s care? Are there any safeguarding concerns that need to be raised regarding this plan? Keep records and improvement. Meet and review care to ensure learning is taking place. Refer to your policy and guidance and ensure all recording and reporting has been completed. Part H: Consent, Capacity & Best Interest Check the person understands the content of this plan before they are asked to sign it*. I agree with the use of this plan Signed Service User:…………………………..………………… Date: ……………… If you are not happy with this plan or do not consent to it please talk to staff.
Day One Thursday 19 February 2015 9:00 – 9:30am Registration 9:30 – 9:50 am Opening Welcome to Country President Emeritus Professor Gillian Triggs Race Discrimination Commissioner Dr Tim Soutphommasane 9:50 – 11:00am Session 1: History of the Racial Discrimination Act Dr Gwenda La Trobe University - Better late than never? Australia’s long, slow road to the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 Professor Andrew Markus, Monash University – Negotiating change in the immigrant nation: public opinion and the transformation of Australia Professor Sarah Joseph, Monash University – The RDA from a 1970s perspective 11:00 – 11:15am Keynote Address His Excellency General the Honourable Sir Peter Cosgrove AK MC (Retd) 11:15 – 11:45am Morning Tea 11:45 – 1:15pm Session 2: Impact of the RDA on Public Law and Human Rights Professor George Williams AO, The University of New South Wales – The constitution and the RDA Professor Beth Gaze, The University of Melbourne –The RDA after 40 years: advancing equality, or sliding into obsolescence? Professor Marcia Langton, The University of Melbourne – Indigenous people, native title and the RDA Professor Hilary Charlesworth, Australian National University – Translating international standards at the national level: the Koowarta case and the RDA 1:15 – 2:15pm Lunch 2:15 – 3:30 pm Session 3: Philosophical Questions Professor Duncan Ivison, The University of Sydney – Toleration and solidarity Associate Professor Geoffrey Levey, The University of New South Wales – Why the proposed RDA reforms were lost Dr Peter Balint, The University of New South Wales – Racial discrimination and racial tolerance: a location and defence 3:30 – 3:45pm Afternoon Tea 3:45 – 5:15pm Session 4: Racial Vilification Associate Professor David Rolph, The University of Sydney – The Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth), Defamation and Freedom of Speech Professor Adrienne Stone, The University of Melbourne – The constitution, freedom of speech and the RDA Peter Wertheim AM, Executive Council of Australian Jewry – Freedom and social cohesion: a law that protects both Associate Professor Winnifred R. Louis & Professor Matthew J. Hornsey, University of Queensland - Psychological dimensions of racial vilification and harassment Close
3) Cooperative effort with local government leads to improved economic development outcomes. Develop and maintain positive working relationships with the local government bodies in Your Region. Priority Performance Measures Number and nature of working groups/projects/partnerships with local government and regional development outcomes resulting from this. Additional Performance Measures Number of requests from local government to participate in strategy development and regional development projects and outcomes from input provided. Number of productive connections facilitated for local government. Region investment prospectus or similar collaboratively developed. Number of cross-local government projects/initiatives assisted. 4) Achieve Government program objectives. Assist in the delivery of Australian Government programs including public and private sector decentralisation. Priority Performance Measures Evidence of identification of decentralisation opportunities and facilitation undertaken to deliver these. Number and description of initiatives to assist in the delivery of Australian Government programs.
5) Maximise access to Government programs and grants. Promote and disseminate information on Australian Government policies and programs and support community stakeholders in Your Region to develop project proposals to access funding. Priority Performance Measures Number of enquiries received/generated and proposals assisted with. Number and of successful proposals. Additional Performance Measures Number of promotional channels/events. Number of organisations assisted to connect with government programs. 6) Advice supports development outcomes. For Your Region: Provide evidence-based advice to the Australian Government on critical regional development issues; and Provide information on regional activities and competitive advantages to all levels of government, industry, business and community sectors. Priority Performance Measures Number of reports or submissions to the Australian Government critical regional development issues. Effectiveness of communication of regional activities and competitive advantages to regional stakeholders. Additional Performance Measures An investment prospectus or similar evidence based information publication is prepared and/or promoted to relevant markets and parties of interest (may be RDA generated or leverage other regional publications). Number of Government consultation sessions/surveys/inquiries/advisory groups the RDA provided input to/hosted. Facilitate organisations/councils to contribute regional datasets to data.gov.au and nationalmap.gov.au. Analysis of regional assets and identified investment and development barriers (including infrastructure barriers) published with recommendations. Number and nature of activities resulting in promotion/recognition of regional activities (e.g. presenting at conferences, regional/industry awards judging panels).
GOVERNMENT POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PURASAWALKAM, CHENNAI - 12 DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER ENGINEERING III YEAR / V SEM / FIRST SHIFT 35252- RELATIONAL DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS Subject handled by: C Designation : Part Time / Guest Lecturer HOURS CHAPTER NO PORTIONS COVERED DATE UNIT - I Database Systems and data modelling (14 HRS) 1 1.1 Introduction to database Database systems: Database Management System , Characteristics of Database Components of Database , Functions of Database , Understanding database model, Evolution 11.06.18 2 3 1.1 Types of database models: Hierarchical Database Model, Network Database Model, Relational Database Model. 12.06.18 4 5 1.2 Transactional Databases, Decision Support Databases and Hybrid Databases , Open Source databases 12.06.18 6 7 1.3 Relational data model: CODD’s rules ,Components of RDBMS 14.06.18 ` 8 Table structure,Records,rows, tuples , attributes. Keys : Primary, Foreign , Composite, unique keys 14.06.18 9 Meta Data, Data Dictionary. Data Integrity - Data Constraints and validation : Types of Constraints Difference between SQL and MYSQL 15.06.18 10 11 1.4 ER Diagram and Normalization: Methodologies of Designing Database,Entities-Relationships (1:1, 1 : many and many : many) 18.06.18 12 ER Diagram – Samples . 19.06.18 13 Normalization : Benefits ,Normal Forms , 1st Normal Form, 2nd Normal Form , 3rd Normal Form . 21.06.18 14 1.5 Database Administration : Server/client And Distributed concept: DBA Tasks ,DBA Tools 22.06.18 15 Data Base Maintenance – Backup and Recovery 22.06.18 HOURS CHAPTER NO PORTIONS COVERED DATE UNIT-II MySQL Administration & Database Design 15 HOURS 16 2.1 Installation of MySQL:Features of MySQL,Download, Installing, Starting & Stopping connections to the MySQL server 26.06.18
O.25 Number of NRN communication Title and definition Measures concerned Source of data Number of NRN communication tools, by type Networking NRN reporting to MA annually This indicator is broken down as follows: Total events organized (seminars, conference, field trips….); Number of publications: leaflets, newsletters, magazines… issued by the NRN including e-publications; Number of other NRN communication tools used to communicate RDP to broader public (e.g. website, social media....); Number of project examples collected and dissiminated by NRN; From project databases, number of projects identified, collected, documented and disssimated. Out of these total number of events organized, publications and other communication tools, it is counted how many: Are focused on sharing and disseminating monitoring and evaluation findings; Are devoted to advisors and/or innovation support services; Are devoted to LAG including support to cooperation. O.26 Number of ENRD activities in which the NRN has participated and definition Measure concerned Source of data Number of ENRD activities in which the NRN has participated Networking NRN reporting to MA annually This indicator counts all ENRD activities in which the NRN has participated and out of those to which the NRN actively contributed (e.g. through presentations, facilitation of working groups, poster sessions, etc.). List and of pre-defined output indicators used for the Performance Framework These indicators are pre-calculated by SFC 2014 based on the Indicator Plan. The output indicators can be adapted/changed by the MA to better represent the RDP specificities. Indicators of the pre-defined performance framework indicators Priority 2 Total Public Expenditure P2 (€) otal public expenditure of all measures under P2 Number of agriculture holdings with RDP support for investment in restructuring or modernisation (2A) + Number of agricultural holdings with RDP supported business development plan/investment for young farmers (2B) Number of holdings supported under 4.1 (2A) + number of holdings supported under 6.1 (2B) {or number of holdings supported under 4.1 (2B) if 6.1 = 0 } Total Public Expenditure P3 (€) public expenditure of all measures under P3
security? If yes submit “ISO/PO Checklist for CRs and Mods”. Has there been any change in location of electronic or hard copy data? If yes submit updated “VAMHCS Research Data Inventory Tool” Yes No Has there been any change in location of tissue repository or data repository? Yes No The table below must be completed for all team members If the team member interacts with VAMHCS patients, performs procedures at the VAMHCS, or has access to VA data then all information for the person must be listed here. Confirmation of required items for study team members: VA Status, Required Trainings and Scope of Practice Principal Investigator, and ALL Research Team Members Status of Team Member VA Privacy and HIPAA Policy Training (required annually) VA Privacy and Information Security Awareness and Rules of behavior (required annually) CITI Training (required every 3 years) Scope of Practice (copy should be on file in Research Office and also in study binder) VA Paid Staff WOC (List expiration date on most recent WOC appointment letter) ** UM/ Non VA (only) Date Completed Date Completed Date Completed Date ACOS signed **If this study is a collaborative project and there are team members who do not participate on the VA portion of the study they should be listed here as UM/Non VA only and no other info on status, trainings or Scope of Practice is required.
2.1: Use foundational knowledge to design or implement an integrated, comprehensive, and balanced curriculum. [Reading specialists may have responsibilities for teaching students who struggle with learning to read and must also be able to support teachers in their efforts to provide effective instruction for all students.] Demonstrate an understanding of the research and literature that undergirds the reading and writing curriculum instruction for all pre-K–12 students. Develop and implement the curriculum to meet the specific needs of students who struggle with reading. Support teachers and other personnel in the design, implementation, and evaluation of the reading and writing curriculum for all students. Work with teachers and other personnel in developing a literacy curriculum that has vertical and horizontal alignment across pre-K–12. 2.2: Use appropriate and varied instructional approaches, including those that develop word recognition, language comprehension, strategic knowledge, and reading–writing connections. [McKenna and Stahl (2009) define reading as including word recognition, language comprehension, and strategic knowledge] Use instructional approaches supported by literature and research for the following areas: concepts of print, phonemic awareness, phonics, vocabulary, comprehension, fluency, critical thinking, motivation, and writing. Provide appropriate in-depth instruction for all readers and writers, especially those who struggle with reading and writing. Support classroom teachers and education support personnel to implement instructional approaches for all students. As needed, adapt instructional materials and approaches to meet the language-proficiency needs of English learners and students who struggle to learn to read and write. 2.3: Use a wide range of texts (e.g., narrative, expository, and poetry) from traditional print, digital, and online resources. Demonstrate knowledge of and a critical stance toward a wide variety of quality traditional print, digital, and online resources. Support classroom teachers in building and using a quality, accessible classroom library and materials collection that
81-83 High Street Great Missenden, Buckinghamshire, HP16 0AL Registered charity number 1085853 A company limited by guarantee number 4178505. Application for the appointment of Learning Session Leader CONFIDENTIAL Please complete all sections as as possible using type or black ink Surname First names Address Home telephone number: Business telephone number: Mobile telephone number: address: Education Establishment (with Academic qualifications (with subject and level obtained) Professional qualifications Qualification Date
Current or most recent employment/work experience Employer's name and address Post and duties From To Current or most recent salary Period of notice required from current employment Previous employment / work experience (most recent first) Employer's name and address Post and duties Dates from/to Reason for leaving
SECTION 6. GENERATION and/or USE of WHOLE TRANSGENIC PLANTS Complete this section if you are using r∙s∙DNA to create transgenic plants or use transgenic plants. It is not necessary to fill out any of the other sections (DO NOT fill out any “generation” or “use” sections). Genus, species, of parent strain: Transgenic strain identification: Is a USDA permit required for transport or use of these plants? YES NO If YES, Please provide your: Permit Number: OR Application Number: TRANSGENE Specify the nature of the gene sequence modified and/or inserted into the recombinant plant: Promoter Gene Name Source of gene species) Biological Activity of Sequence HOST-VECTOR SYSTEM Describe the method of gene transfer: Identify name of vector: Identify vector system (example: Rhizobium spp. and Agrobacterium spp.): Will a deliberate attempt be made to obtain expression of foreign gene encoded in r∙s∙DNA or r∙s∙RNA? YES NO BIOSAFETY CONTAINMENT LEVEL This project will be conducted at Biosafety Level: BSL-1-P BSL-2-P BSL-3-P Housed in: Greenhouse Growth Chamber DESCRIBE:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. , . } } } } } } } Case No.: GUILTY PLEA ADVICE OF RIGHTS CERTIFICATION At the Change of Plea Hearing I will be placed under oath. I will be subject to penalties for perjury or further prosecution if I willfully make a false statement. If anything is said or done in court that I do not understand, I must tell the judge. I may be asked about my education and job history and whether I read, write, and understand the English language. I will be asked if I have any mental or emotional impairment or physical illness that might affect my ability to understand the court proceedings. I will be asked if I have taken any drugs, medications, or other substances that might affect my ability to understand the court proceedings. I will be asked if my plea is voluntary. I will be asked if anyone coerced or threatened me to plead guilty. I will be asked if I have any complaints about my attorney. I will be asked: If I received the indictment; I understand, __________. I understand, __________. I understand, __________. I understand, __________. I understand, __________. I understand, __________. I understand, __________. I understand, __________. I understand, __________. I understand, ___________
The RDP Operating Model The purpose of the RDP Operating Model The RDP Operating provides a framework that takes an input (Commonwealth funding) and describes how it is converted, through activities, into client outcomes. Through this framework, DSS has categorised its operating requirements for RDPs, specifically – HOW RDPs are required to operate; WHAT activities RDPs are required to deliver; WHO activities are intended for (target cohort); WHY activities are being delivered (outcomes); and HOW success will be measured. It is important to note that the RDP Operating Model is not intended to provide organisations with a prescriptive model of a RDP’s operations. Instead it is designed to identify the core operational elements (and the Department’s associated requirements) considered essential to the essence and purpose of the RDPs. The RDP Operating should be read in conjunction with the Grant Opportunity Guidelines and Grant Agreement. The RDP Operating Model components The RDP Operating model is made up of the following operating components. Within each component, DSS has specified its operating requirements for RDPs. Purpose Component Building Block Description Define HOW RDPs are required to operate Grant Funds Describes how Grants must be managed, including spending and accounting for Grants. Partnerships Describes the network of organisations essential to the successful operations of the RDP. Resources Describes the human resources required to be in place to support the delivery of activities. Infrastructure Describes the basic physical facilities and installations required to be in place to support the delivery of activities e.g. offices, IT systems, transportation, and service delivery channels. Operating Policies Describes the business rules and procedures essential to the successful operations of the RDP.
Associates and Contractors The following entities are not applicants nor affiliated entities and do not have to sign the "mandate for or "affiliated entities' statement": Associates Other organisations or individuals may be involved in the action. Such associates play a real role in the action but may not receive funding from the grant, with the exception of per diem or travel costs. Associates do not have to meet the eligibility criteria referred to in section 2.1.1. Associates must be mentioned in Annex A.2, section 4. ‘Associates participating in the action’ — of the grant application form. Contractors The beneficiaries and their affiliated entities are permitted to award contracts. Associates or affiliated entity(ies) cannot be also contractors in the project. Contractors are subject to the procurement rules set out in Annex IV to the standard grant contract. Eligible actions: actions for which an application may be made Definition: An action is composed of a set of activities. Duration The initial planned duration of an action may not be lower than 30 months nor exceed 42 months. Sectors or themes Integrated and sustainable service delivery in water, energy and education Creation of livelihood and employment opportunities Access to justice and rule of law Capacity building of authorities and multi-stakeholder coordination platforms to cooperate in developing an integrated approach in relation to the three sectors above Location Actions must take place in one of the following geographical areas in Ethiopia: Shire area (Tigray Regional State) Dollo Ado area (Somali Regional State) Jijiga area (Somali Regional State) Bahrale and Aysaita areas (Afar Regional State) urban centres in Ethiopia (Out of Camp/urban refugees) Types of action The types of action which may be financed under this call are those directly contributing to the achievement of the objectives of the Call for Proposals. Actions to be funded must be in the form of coherent and self- contained sets of activities designed to achieve the objectives in the priority areas stated in section 1.2 of these guidelines within a specific timeframe. The actions must have clear objectives and target groups, and they must be conceived to produce specific measurable results, with relevant indicators that respond to a particular need or issue. Their justification must be based on recent reliable information and broad-based consultation and participation of project target groups and other stakeholders. Projects should be designed in such a way that they contribute to a structural change and have long-term impact.
Question 1: Do you feel there are benefits in having a national guidance on rapid discharge planning for patients who wish to die at home, and, if so, what are the main benefits? Please comment The development of a National Guide on Rapid Discharge Planning for Patients who wish to die at Home is welcome in the context of making the experience better for the patient and their family. The availability of this guideline will ensure that patient’s wishes can be considered and if appropriate met in a realistic and timely fashion. Using this framework will facilitate the standardisation of patient care and will ensure the provision of high quality safe care to the patient and their family. Consultation Question 2 Question 2: Is the layout of the document clear and easy to use? Please comment The document layout is clear and easy to follow. Consultation Question 3 Question 3: Have all of the appropriate themes regarding rapid discharge planning been included in the document? If not, what additional information should be added? Please comment
NHS Education for Scotland REFUGEE DOCTORS PROGRAMME: ENGLISH LANGUAGE COURSES AND FEES 2013 COURSE LOCATION DURATION FEES TRAVEL ACCOMMODATION LUNCH VOUCHERS ESOL Intermediate Anniesland 1 Year Fee Waived Zonecard No No ESOL Inter Anniesland 1 Year Fee Waived Zonecard No No ESOL Advanced Anniesland 1 Year Fee Waived Zonecard No No IELTs Preparation City of Glasgow College 8 Weeks £216 Zonecard No No IELTs Exam University of Glasgow 1 Day £130 No No No PLAB 1 Preparation 390 - 398 Balfour House, High Road, Ilford, Essex. United Kingdom. IG1 1TL 020 8478 6100 10 Days £300 Return Train travel Yes (Short Course 10 days – 11 overnight stays) Yes (£15 per day duration of course) PLAB 1 Exam London 1 Day £145 (GMC will pay for 2 attempts) Return Train travel Glasgow-London Yes (one overnight stay) Yes (£15 for day of exam)
For EPA [and the State] to provide to SDs, upon request, split samples and/or duplicate samples in connection with EPA’s [and the State’s] oversight sampling; and For SDs to submit to EPA [and the State] all sampling and tests results and other data in connection with the implementation of the CD. Site Wide Monitoring Plan. The purpose of the Site Wide Monitoring Plan (SWMP) is to obtain baseline information regarding the extent of contamination in affected media at the Site; to obtain information, through short- and long- term monitoring, about the movement of and changes in contamination throughout the Site, before and during implementation of the RA; to obtain information regarding contamination levels to determine whether PS are achieved; and to obtain information to determine whether to perform additional actions, including further Site monitoring. The SWMP must include: Description of the environmental media to be monitored; Description of the data collection parameters, including existing and proposed monitoring devices and locations, schedule and frequency of monitoring, analytical parameters to be monitored, and analytical methods employed; Description of how performance data will be analyzed, interpreted, and reported, and/or Site-related requirements; Description of verification sampling procedures; Description of deliverables that will be generated in connection with monitoring, including sampling schedules, laboratory records, monitoring reports, and monthly and annual reports to EPA and State agencies; and Description of proposed additional monitoring and data collection actions (such as increases in frequency of monitoring, and/or installation of additional monitoring devices in the affected areas) in the event that results from monitoring devices indicate changed conditions (such as higher than expected concentrations of the contaminants of concern or groundwater contaminant plume movement). Construction Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan (CQA/QCP). The purpose of the Construction Quality Assurance Plan (CQAP) is to describe planned and systemic activities that provide confidence that the RA construction will satisfy all plans, specifications, and related requirements, including quality objectives. The purpose of the Construction Quality Control Plan (CQCP) is to describe the activities to verify that RA construction has satisfied all plans, specifications, and related requirements, including quality objectives. The CQA/QCP must:
should not be edited to include, in each paragraph that describes a deliverable or task, either the deadline for such deliverable or task, or even a cross reference to the Schedule that contains such deadline. REMEDIAL DESIGN RD Work Plan. Respondents shall submit a Remedial Design (RD) Work Plan (RDWP) for EPA approval. The RDWP must include: Plans for implementing all RD activities identified in this SOW, in the RDWP, or required by EPA to be conducted to develop the RD; A description of the overall management strategy for performing the RD, including a proposal for phasing of design and construction, if applicable; A description of the proposed general approach to contracting, construction, operation, maintenance, and monitoring of the Remedial Action (RA) as necessary to implement the Work; A description of the responsibility and authority of all organizations and key personnel involved with the development of the RD; Descriptions of any areas requiring clarification and/or anticipated problems (e.g., data gaps); [Description of any proposed pre-design investigation;] [Description of any proposed treatability study;] Descriptions of any applicable permitting requirements and regulatory requirements; Description of for obtaining access in connection with the Work, such as property acquisition, property leases, and/or easements; and The following supporting deliverables described in ¶ 7.7 (Supporting Deliverables): Health and Safety Plan; and Emergency Response Plan. [NOTE: If the SOW includes ¶ 3.3 (Pre-Design Investigation), also include Field Sampling Plan and Quality Assurance Project Plan.] Respondents shall meet regularly with EPA to discuss design issues as necessary, as directed or determined by EPA. NOTE: The SOW describes many deliverables that are to be submitted to EPA. Some are to be submitted “for EPA approval,” some “for EPA comment,” and some are to be simply submitted without either EPA approval or comment. The model SOW includes careful selections of those deliverables that are to be submitted for “approval,” those that are to be