zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Residential Energy Storage <= 10kW (preAB 1637) $6,078,713 $6,078,713 $6,078,713 $6,078,713 $6,078,713 Residential Energy Storage <= 10kW (AB 1637 funds) $0 (no increase) $6,692,373 $6,495,539 $6,495,539 $0 (no increase) Total Funds for Residential Energy Storage <= 10kW $6,078,713 $12,771,086 $12,574,251 $12,574,251 $6,078,713 Renewable Generation (preAB 1637) $9,005,500 $9,005,500 $9,005,500 n/a n/a Renewable Generation (AB 1637 funds) $11,810,070 $11,462,715 $11,462,715 n/a n/a Total Funds for Renewable Generation $20,815,570 $20,468,215 $20,468,215 n/a n/a Step 1 not used due to timing of AB 1637 implementation The ACR asked parties how to address the possibility a decision implementing AB 1637 is issued too late for any new incentive funds to be allocated to Step 1. In such an event, Custom Power Solar, CalSEIA suggest applying Step 1 funding to Step 2 and Step 3. CESA and AMS suggest applying Step 1 funding to Step 2. SolarCity/Tesla suggest disbursing Step 1 funds evenly between Steps 2 through 5. We find that to promote administrative simplicity and fairness, in the event that a decision implementing AB 1637 is not approved by the Commission before the Step 1 incentive budget approved in D.1606055 for renewable generation projects is fully subscribed, the funds that would have been allocated
Community Storage In R.1012007, we issued a staff report that established our definition of Community Storage as a distribution energy storage resource. Community Storage is typically associated with a cluster of customer load, whether residential, campuslike complexes, or commercial development. Battery capacity may be combined to serve the load in aggregate, or may be dispersed through a residential or commercial development, and may serve the following functions: Providing storage capacity for excess output from smallscale renewable energy sources; Providing smoothing and power quality regulation for intermittent resources; Providing backup power capability during outages. In this proceeding, the CPUC sought to understand the status of existing and planned distributionlevel community storage pilot programs; any barriers to developing distributionlevel community storage; and what policy options, if any, should be pursued to further address the barriers identified. In comments SCE identified four different discrete applications that could be considered community storage: Storage located at a distribution feeder that is interconnected directly to the utility distribution grid… and operated by the utility for the purpose of distribution reliability. A series of small batteries interconnected [behind the meter] as several customer locations within the same local area, aggregated together and operated (in at least some hours) by the [utility distribution company]. These batteries may be operated to provide customer bill management as well as to provide services to the local distribution grid. Storage interconnected [in front of the meter] within a community, and operated to provide services to local customers…
Specific Claim:* Claimed CPUC Award ATTORNEY, EXPERT, AND ADVOCATE FEES Item Year Hours Rate $ Basis for Rate* Total $ Hours Rate $ Total $ Robert Finkelstein 2015 160.75 $505 D.16-11-004 $81,178.75 160.75 $505 $81,178.75 R. Finkelstein 2016 56.0 $510 D.16-11-004 $28,560.00 56.0 $510 $28,560.00 Thomas Long 2015 0.75 $570 D.15-06-021 (for 2014; 2015 COLA of 0%) $427.50 0.75 $570 $427.50 T. Long 2016 2.25 $575 D.16-11-004 $1,293.75 2.25 $575 $1,293.75 Cathy Yap 2015 86.75 $275 D.15-08-023 (for work in 2013-14) $23,856.25 86.75 $280 $24,290.00 Subtotal: $ 135,316.25 Subtotal: $135,750.00 INTERVENOR COMPENSATION CLAIM PREPARATION ** Item Year Hours Rate $ Basis for Rate* Total $ Hours Rate Total $ R. Finkelstein 2015 0.5 $252.50 ½ of approved 2014 rate $126.25 0.5 $252.50 $126.25 R. Finkelstein 12 $255.00 ½ of requested 2016 rate $3,060.00 12 $255 $3,060.00 Subtotal: $3,186.25 Subtotal: $3,186.25 COSTS # Item Detail Amount Amount Photocopying Copies made of TURN pleadings for service, hearing material and exhibits and, where applicable, copying charges from consultant billings, at 10 cents/pg $320.30 $320.30 Lexis/Nexis Computerized research costs associated with prep for hearings and brief drafting $186.69 $186.69 Postage Expenses for postage for this proceeding $9.38 $9.38 Subtotal: $516.37 Subtotal: $516.37 TOTAL REQUEST: $139,018.87 TOTAL AWARD: $139,452.62
Grant applications processed. Electronic information regarding funding retained for 10 years. No information shared. spreadsheets collating application information. PLA 9 Housing Strategy – self build register Details of applicants held on a spreadsheet. Letters, proof of residency or written enquiries are scanned and held electronically. Data will be deleted when applicant fails to renew their application or asks to be removed from the list. Spreadsheet and scanned documents PLA 10 S.106 monitoring Contact details for individuals relating to specific projects held as long as project is live. Contact details for individuals relating to specific projects. PLA 11 CIL Contact details for individuals for 12 months after final payment made. Completed CIL forms, evidence of use etc. Contact details for applicants.
Daniel O’Donovan, Norton Cottage, Rearahanaugh, Skibbereen. Doctor, Landlord and Magistrate. Dr. Daniel O’Donovan 1818, Norton Cottage, Skibbereen, listed 1838 , son Richard Esq. O’Donovan Cove, and Jane d Alexander O’Donovan, Squince. Fond of dogs. Father of Dr. O’Donovan author History of Carbery. Brother of Timothy and Richard O’Donovan JP and uncle of Richard O’Donovan JP. Daniel O’Donovan MD has land in Knockeens, Glanroon in Griffiths. Voted 1841 election for O’Connell/Roche. He was married to a sister of Rickard Deasy of the Clonakilty brewing family, MP. and Attorney General for Ireland and later Judge. James O’Hea, Derreenivirche. Patrick O’Hea, Killeenleagh. Thomas O’Hea, Dreeneveragh. Daniel O’Sullivan, City of Dublin, Farramand (Farranamanagh, Kilcrohane?) Daniel Regan, Deelish. Skibbereen John Salter, Ballydehob. Cornelius Sullivan, Ardahill. Probably Kilcrohane. Denis Sullivan, Ballydehob. Edmund Tobin, Gortavollig, probably related to extended ’King’ Richard Tobin family he was local agent to Lord Bantry active in land dealings, road building, son Richard Junior businessman in Durrus. Patrick Tobin, Gortavollig, Gortavallig, may have given evidence to enquiry Bantry 1840s John Young, Barraghavella. Robert Young, Rearhanagh. Thomas Young, Rearhanagh. O’Donovan Political Machine:
(1) “acclimatised” means a state in which a crew member’s circadian biological clock is synchronised to the time zone where the crew member is. A crew member is considered to be acclimatised to a 2-hour wide time zone surrounding the local time at the point of departure. When the local time at the place where a duty commences differs by more than 2 hours from the local time at the place where the next duty starts, the crew member, for the calculation of the maximum daily flight duty period, is considered to be acclimatised in accordance with the values in the Table 1. Table 1 Time difference (h) between reference time and local time where the crew member starts the next duty Time elapsed since reporting at reference time < 48 48 – 71:59 72 – 95:59 96 – 119:59 ≥ 120 < 4 B D D D D ≥ 4 and ≤ 6 B X D D D > 6 and ≤ 9 B X X D D > 9 and ≤ 12 B X X X D “B” means acclimatised to the local time of the departure time zone, “D” means acclimatised to the local time where the crew member starts his/her next duty, and “X” means that the crew member is in an unknown state of acclimatisation; NOTE: The operator shall decide if this definition is required by its operation. (2) “reference time” means the local time at the reporting point situated in a 2-hour wide time zone band around the local time where a crew member is acclimatised; (3) “accommodation” means, for the purpose of standby and split duty, a quiet and comfortable place not open to the public with the ability to control light and temperature, equipped with adequate furniture that provides a crew member with the possibility to sleep, with enough capacity to accommodate all crew members present at the same time and with access to food and drink;
Maximum daily FDP with extension Starting time of FDP 1 – 2 sectors (in hours) 3 sectors (in hours) 4 sectors (in hours) 5 sectors (in hours) 06:00 – 06:14 Not allowed Not allowed Not allowed Not allowed 06:15 - 06:29 13:15 12:45 12:15 11:45 06:30 - 06:44 13:30 13:00 12:30 12:00 06:45 - 06:59 13:45 13:15 12:45 12:15 07:00 - 13:29 14:00 13:30 13:00 12:30 13:30 - 13:59 13:45 13:15 12:45 Not allowed 14:00 - 14:29 13:30 13:00 12:30 Not allowed 14:30 - 14:59 13:15 12:45 12:15 Not allowed 15:00 - 15:29 13:00 12:30 12:00 Not allowed 15:30 - 15:59 12:45 Not allowed Not allowed Not allowed 16:00 - 16:29 12:30 Not allowed Not allowed Not allowed 16:30 – 16:59 12:15 Not allowed Not allowed Not allowed 17:00 – 17:29 12:00 Not allowed Not allowed Not allowed 17:30 – 17:59 11:45 Not allowed Not allowed Not allowed 18:00 – 18:29 11:30 Not allowed Not allowed Not allowed 18:30 – 18:59 11:15 Not allowed Not allowed Not allowed 19:00 – 03:59 Not allowed Not allowed Not allowed Not allowed 04:00 – 04:14 Not allowed Not allowed Not allowed Not allowed 04:15 – 04:29 Not allowed Not allowed Not allowed Not allowed 04:30 – 04:44 Not allowed Not allowed Not allowed Not allowed 04:45 – 04:59 Not allowed Not allowed Not allowed Not allowed 05:00 – 05:14 Not allowed Not allowed Not allowed Not allowed 05:15 – 05:29 Not allowed Not allowed Not allowed Not allowed 05:30 – 05:44 Not allowed Not allowed Not allowed Not allowed 05:45 – 05:59 Not allowed Not allowed Not allowed Not allowed
Position title: Lecturer BILL Position number: 18425 Position classification: level Division: Department: Course: Tenure of position: Statement of duties attached: Special features of this position Use the ‘body’ style for regular text. Use the ‘bold’, ‘italic’ and ‘bold italic’ styles when necessary. Use the ‘indent’ style to indent text. Use the ‘body bullet’ style for bullet lists Work related health issues to be considered Use the ‘body’ style for regular text. Use the ‘bold’, ‘italic’ and ‘bold italic’ styles when necessary. Use the ‘indent’ style to indent text. Use the ‘body bullet’ style for bullet lists Physical requirements of this position Frequently or Continuously Intermittently Not Applicable 1 Stooping where hands pass below mid-thigh height 2 Reaching above shoulder height 3 Forward reaching >30cm away from the body 4 Significant sideways twisting of the body 5 Lifting objects weighing >5kg 6 Normal colour vision 7 Physical mobility and agility 8 Working in a noise hazard area 9 Climbing e.g. ladders
metabolite 1-methyl-3-(tetrahydro-3-furylmethyl)urea (UF) was found to be a significant component in whole rice (5.6–17.2 % TRR) and rice straw (8.1–15.9% TRR). For rotational crops, one application of 14C-dinotefuran was made to bare soil at 608 g ai/ha. Following a 30 or 120 day Plant Back Interval (PBI), radishes, lettuces and cereals (sorghum or wheat) were planted. Total radioactive residue levels above 0.010 mg eq/kg plant part were detected in the plants originating from the 30–day field plot. However, the total radioactive residue was below 0.010 mg eq/ kg for all plant parts originating from the plants grown in the 120–day field plot, except for the radish leaf which had residues of 0.035 ppm and 0.026 mg eq/kg for immature and mature leaf samples, respectively. Analyses of the samples of the 120–day field plot showed that no radioactive component exceeded 0.006 mg eq/kg (DN). Parent dinotefuran and its MNG, UF, BCDN and DN metabolites were significant components in rotational crops. The proposed metabolic pathway for dinotefuran in plants is presented below. Figure 2: The Proposed metabolic pathway for dinotefuran in plants Animals For lactating goats, 14C-dinotefuran was orally administered daily for 5 consecutive days at an actual dose of 8.8 ppm in the feed. TRR levels in goat milk, muscle, fat, liver and kidney were low (0.012–0.272 mg eq/kg), with the majority of the TRR being detected in urine and faeces (7.15 and 3.02 mg eq/kg respectively
APPENDIX Compensation Decision Summary Information Compensation Decision: Modifies Decision? Contribution Decision(s): D1701006 Proceeding(s): R1512012 Author: ALJ McKinney Payer(s): Commission’s Intervenor Compensation Fund Intervenor Information Intervenor Claim Date Amount Requested Amount Awarded Multiplier? Reason Change/Disallowance Center for Accessible Technology 03/09/2017 $17,353.50 $17,173.75 N/A Non-resolved Matters Advocate Information First Name Last Name Type Intervenor Hourly Fee Requested Year Hourly Fee Requested Hourly Fee Adopted Melissa Kasnitz Attorney CforAT $450 2015 $450 Melissa Kasnitz Attorney CforAT $455 2016 $455 Melissa Kasnitz Attorney CforAT $455 2017 $455 (END OF APPENDIX)
In addition to the public statements, parties filed written comments to review the testimony provided at the hearings as well as provide further evidence and information regarding the causes of call completion failures and outages, including analysis of specific outages. TURN provided detailed comments in response to the Assigned Commissioner’s Ruling and Proposed Decision. The Final Decision relies heavily on public testimony and written comments provided by TURN in this proceeding. TURN urges the Commission to find that it has made a substantial contribution to the record in this case. 2. Outage The Scoping Memo requested comments on whether the current federal outage reporting thresholds were sufficient to identify issues and potential harms from outages and outages impacting rural and sparsely populated communities. The Scoping Memo also solicited proposals from parties for California-specific thresholds. TURN urged the Commission to lower the reporting threshold for outages because many outages, especially in rural areas, will “fly under the radar” because outages in Scoping Memo, May 6, 2015 at Appendix A-3-4 TURN/CforAT Opening Comments on Scoping Memo, June 12, 2015, p. 6-7 Assigned Commissioner’s Ruling, September 8, 2016, p. 7 TURN Comments on Assigned Commissioner’s Ruling, October 4, 2016, p. 3-4 TURN Reply Comments on Proposed Decision, December 12, 2016, p. 4-5 Final Decision at p. 123, 128-129, 139, 143, 145-146, 150, 165 Verified Reporting- scale
APPENDIX Compensation Decision Summary Information Compensation Decision: Modifies Decision? No Contribution Decision(s): D1612066 Proceeding(s): I1405012 Author: ALJ Mason Payer(s): Intervenor Compensation Fund Intervenor Information Intervenor Claim Date Amount Requested Amount Awarded Multiplier? Reason Change/Disallowance The Utility Reform Network 03/06/17 $96,291.34 $84,407.59 N/A Unresolved Issues Advocate Information First Name Last Name Type Intervenor Hourly Fee Requested Year Hourly Fee Requested Hourly Fee Adopted Christine Mailloux Attorney TURN $450 2014 $450 Christine Mailloux Attorney TURN $450 2015 $450 Christine Mailloux Attorney TURN $455 2016 $455 Christine Mailloux Attorney TURN $455 2017 $455 Ashley Salas Attorney TURN $195 2016 $195 Ashley Salas Attorney TURN $195 2017 $195 Regina Costa Expert TURN $300 2014 $300 Regina Costa Expert TURN $300 2015 $300 Regina Costa Expert TURN $305 2016 $305 (END OF APPENDIX)
issues identified in the record during Phase 1. CforAT, in conjunction with other intervenors, opposed arguments by carriers that such additional work is outside the scope of the proceeding. See generally CforAT Comments on PD and CforAT Reply Comments on PD, filed on December 12, 2016. support for the various requirements set out in the proposed decision and adopted, with or without modification, in the Final Decision, at pp. 162-166. The Final Decision specifically notes that it added “a directive to the Commission’s Communications and the Legal Division to develop guidance for Commission consideration of merger transition practices for future mergers and transfers” in response to comments from CforAT and TURN. Final Decision at p. 166. Ongoing Support for Implementation of the Decision: CforAT, in conjunction with other intervenors, has opposed efforts to delay implementation of the Final Decision and supported the determination that the provisions of the Final Decision were appropriately developed and adopted. To this end, CforAT has opposed efforts to delay and/or stay implementation and opposed carriers’ Application for Rehearing. See TURN and CforAT’s Opposition to Coalition Motion for Stay, filed on February 17, 2017 and TURN and CforAT’s Opposition to Coalition’s Application for Rehearing, filed on February 21, 2017. At this time, a coalition of carriers has sought rehearing on the Final Decision and also sought to stay implementation of most of the decision’s mandates. CforAT, in conjunction with other intervenors, has opposed these requests. Regardless of the final resolution of these matters, the work of CforAT and other intervenors will inform the Commission’s review of these pending requests. Verified
APPENDIX Compensation Decision Summary Information Compensation Decision: Modifies Decision? No Contribution Decision(s): D1612066 Proceeding(s): I1405012 Author: ALJ Mason Payer(s): Intervenor Compensation Fund Intervenor Information Intervenor Claim Date Amount Requested Amount Awarded Multiplier? Reason Change/Disallowance Center for Accessible Technology 03/06/17 $44,571.62 $32,965.88 N/A Unresolved Issues Advocate Information First Name Last Name Type Intervenor Hourly Fee Requested Year Hourly Fee Requested Hourly Fee Adopted Melissa Kasnitz Attorney CforAT $450 2015 $450 Melissa Kasnitz Attorney CforAT $455 2016 $455 Melissa Kasnitz Attorney CforAT $455 2017 $455 Kate Woodford Advocate CforAT $140 2016 $140 (END OF APPENDIX)
2 How did your interest in sustainable horticulture first develop? 3 In what ways can you achieve increasing fertility using sustainable principles? 4 What sustainable horticultural experience have you gained to date? 5 Why do you think you should win this award? 6 Please provide a description of a piece of work that you have undertaken that meets the criteria for this award (To illustrate your description, you may attach one photograph). The Worshipful Company of Gardeners
Consistent with Rule 6.3(a) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, any decision by the Commission in this proceeding to modify or amend Rule 20 will apply prospectively. 5.2. Initial Questions and Information To support this rulemaking, the Commission intends to seek extensive information from the electric utilities and the Facilities-Based Competitive Local Exchange Carriers and the ILECs regarding the Rule 20A program, and to seek responses to a wide range of questions about the program. The preliminary list of information we intend to seek, and the initial list of the questions we intend to ask, are provided below. Respondents and interested persons are asked to file comments evaluating the appropriateness of the wording of the questions and the validity of the data sources identified herein. Respondents and interested persons are also encouraged to recommend additional questions or data that that may facilitate the Commission’s review of the Rule 20A program. Following receipt of these comments, the Commission will hold a workshop and prehearing conference to discuss and refine the list of data and the initial questions and will thereafter, by ruling, issue a final list of questions for comment. 5.2.1. Preliminary Information from Electric Utilities As part of this OIR, we anticipate directing each electric utility to file and serve the following data for the 2005-2016 calendar years. This data will create a common baseline on the relevant issues identified in this rulemaking. A complete list of Rule 20A-eligible communities; The amount of work credit allocations available to each community each year; The number of projects in the following categories: initiated for the next ten years (process has started but no Utilities Conversion Plan);
PERSON SPECIFICATION POST: Teacher of Sociology SCHOOL: FACTOR ESSENTIAL DESIRABLE MEANS OF ASSESSMENT 1 SKILLS, KNOWLEDGE AND APTITUDES Excellent classroom practitioner Good communication skills Ability to teach A level Sociology An established interest in Sociology The ability to converse at ease with pupils and provide advice in an accurate spoken English Skilled in the innovative use of ICT in the teaching in Sociology Ability to offer another Social Science subject at A level (Law, Politics or Psychology). Interview Application form References Selection Tasks 2 QUALIFICATIONS AND TRAINING Relevant degree Qualified Teacher Status Evidence of working as a reflective practitioner, using a variety of approaches to secure ongoing professional development. Application form Interview References Sight of Certificates 3 EXPERIENCE Good track record of teaching at secondary level, including ITT teaching Experience of advanced level teaching Application form Interview References 4 PERSONAL QUALITIES Highly motivated and enthusiastic Commitment to success in education Good team worker Prepared to accept responsibility and take initiative Good organisational skills Ability to motivate students Ability to form and maintain appropriate relationships and personal boundaries with students An interest in and commitment to, the whole school community Interview SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS Satisfactory Enhanced clearance with the Disclosure and Barring Service Occupational Health clearance Application form Interview References
06/19/17 9:30 a.m. ALJ Ayoade Comr Randolph A.16-10-001 (EH) - In the Matter of Application of The Ponderosa Telephone Co. (U 1014 C) to Review Intrastate Rates and Charges, Establish a New Intrastate Revenue Requirement and Rate Design, and Modify Selected Rates, Commission Courtroom, San Francisco (Also June 20 – 21.) 08/07/2017 10:00 a.m. ALJ Roscow Comr Picker A.16-09-003 (EH)- Application of Southern California Edison Company for Approval of its 2016 Rate Design Window Proposals. Commission Courtroom, San Francisco (Also August 8-11) 08/17/17 9:30 a.m. LJ Weatherford Comr Randolph A.15-07-019 (EH) - Application of California-American Water Company (U210W) for Authorization to Modify Conservation and Rationing Rules, Rate Design, and Other Related Issues for the Monterey District. Commission Courtroom, San Francisco (Also August 18) 09/05/17 9:00 a.m. ALJ Yacknin Comr Peterman A.16-10-019 (EH) - Application of Pacific Gas and Electric Company to Recover Costs Recorded in the Catastrophic Event Memorandum Account Pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 454.9(U39E), Commission Courtroom, San Francisco (Also September 6 – 8) 09/12/17 9:30 a.m. ALJ Simon Comr Picker A.16-10-019 (EH) - Order Instituting Rulemaking to Implement Portions of AB 117 Concerning Community Choice Aggregation Commission Courtroom, San Francisco (Also September 13) NOTICE OF ALL-PARTY MEETINGS (PU Code § 1701.3(c)) (A quorum of Commissioners and/or their staff may attend All-Party Meetings noticed on the Daily Calendar.) NONE
Public Utilities Commission of the State of California Timothy J. Sullivan, Executive Director Headquarters Southern California Office 505 Van Ness Avenue 320 West 4th Street, Suite 500 San Francisco, CA 94102 Los Angeles, CA 90013 (415) 703-2782 (213) 576-7000 Website: http://www.cpuc.ca.gov Calendar Archive: prior to year 2000 Daily Calendar Tuesday, May 2, 2017 Commission Meetings Notices Public Meetings and Workshops Notice of Draft Resolutions (PU Code § 311(g)) New Filings Petitions for Modification and Applications for Rehearing Proposed Decisions/Alternates/Presiding Officer’s Decisions/Arbitrator’s Reports Advice Letter Filings Miscellaneous Transportation Items Miscellaneous Communications Matters Table of Submission Dates for the Preceding Two Weeks Changes to Hearing Calendar Hearings Notice of All-Party Meetings (PU Code §1701.3(c)) The Commission’s policy is to schedule hearings (meetings, workshops, etc.) in locations that are accessible to people with disabilities. The CPUC encourages all Californians to participate in its meetings, hearings, workshops, and proceedings. We try to hold our public meetings only in places that are wheelchair accessible and which can accommodate specialized equipment and other services useful to people with disabilities. Please see the notice of the meeting you wish to attend for more specifics. If you plan to attend and need specialized accommodations for a particular meeting that are not listed in the notice, request them from the Public Advisor’s Office at least three business days in advance of the meeting. Contact the Public Advisor’s Office by any one of the following: Email: toll-free: 1-866-849-8390 Voice: 415-703-2074 FAX: 415-355-5404 (Attn.: Public Advisor) TTY: 1-866-836-7825 (toll-free) 1-415-703-5282 REGULAR COMMISSION BUSINESS MEETINGS May 11, 2017 9:30 am Merced Civic Center,
approved the Power Charge Indifference Adjustment (PCIA) mechanism to allow recovery of potential abovemarket costs associated with departing load for market/”bundled” energy storage projects but denied a request for an extension of the PCIA mechanism for market/”bundled” energy storage contracts beyond 10 years. Finally, the CPUC approved the proposed utility CEPs, with modifications, and directed that these evaluation protocols be used in the December 2014 solicitation requirements and bid materials. Following the Prehearing Conference (PHC) held on May 20, 2015, the Assigned Commissioner and Administrative Law Judges issued a Scoping Memo and Ruling on June 6, 2015 (First Scoping Memo and Ruling). The First Scoping Memo and Ruling determined that the proceeding would be divided into two tracks. Track 1 was narrowly scoped to consider issues that required resolution prior to the commencement of the utilities’ 2016 energy procurement solicitations and were resolved in D.1601032. Among other issues, D.1601032 approved the utilities’ request for additional flexibility of energy storage targets between grid domains, allowing the utilities to satisfy some of their transmission and distribution domain targets through customerconnected projects, up to a “ceiling” of 200 percent of the existing customer domain targets; clarified that direct current (DC)based storage used as part of a DC microgrid is an eligible storage product for purposes of meeting the storage targets but found that Hydrogenbased powertogas option (P2G), when injected into the natural gas pipeline system, is ineligible to meet the storage targets established in D.1310040 and the requirements of AB 2514; and established that credit for SGIPfunded energy storage projects should be split evenly between an unbundled customer’s
Pray accept, with the expression of my keen sympathy for the Irish, that of the respectful regard with which I am, etc. + C. J. Eugene, Bishop of Marseilles. [To Miss O’Connell at Killarney]. 16:III in Oblate Writings Remittance of 25 Pounds Sterling. O’Connell, Miss Marseilles, April 15, 1847. I have just written to My Lord, the Bishop of Killarney, to announce that I am arranging to send to him the sum of 150 pounds sterling for the poor of his diocese. I am telling him at the same time that I will add to these 150 pounds another 25 pounds that I shall ask him to remit to you for the unfortunate people aided by the Society of Ladies in the name of which you have done me the honour of writing. This will mean that the diocese of Killarney will have received 25 pounds more than the others but I did not wish your confidence in writing to myself to go without response. The sum is small for such great needs but in our country we already have so much suffering that our charities are overburdened and this will explain to you why I have been the only French bishop so far who has dared make an appeal on behalf of Ireland, whose plight nonetheless stirs deep sympathy in France. I am happy to have been able, even in a small way, to associate myself with the merit of your good works and to have this occasion to recommend myself to your prayers and those of the ladies of your Society. I wish them for my part, in the midst of the sorrows which afflict your country, all the consolations that their charity deserves. I am respectfully... + C. J. Eugene, Bishop of Marseilles. Diary Oblate Writings XXI April 18: Mass at la Mission de France, preceded by the abjuration of a Protestant and by the Confirmation of a certain number of adults. The chapel was filled with 700 men, the greatest number belonging to the highest class of Marseillean society and who all took Communion from my hand. Nothing is comparable to the imposing sight of this fervent assembly and to the recollection which was continuously maintained during this rather long ceremony. The presence of the Holy Spirit descended upon the souls of the Confirmands was perceptibly communicated to all the whole assembly; for my part, I sensed its gentle influence and when I thought, while
year- and public-private partnerships. The registry seeks transparency of all indebtedness obtained by such public entities. However, registration is conditioned to fulfillment of all obligations imposed by the Law and other legal provisions applicable to States and municipalities. The Ministry of Finance may request to financial institutions any information relating to the financings and obligations registered with the Debt Public Registry, to compare the information received by the public entities, and in the event it finds any differences, they must be published. The Debt Public Registry must be published in the web page of the Ministry of Finance and must be updated daily. Surveillance and Penalties. The Law provides that a Federal Supervising Entity (Auditoría Superior de la Federación), depending of the General Congress, as well as, local entities performing the same tasks in the States, shall be in charge of surveilling fulfillment of all provisions of the Law. The Law also provides that public officers, individuals and/or companies that harm public finances shall be responsible for damages. As well, public officers who fail to comply with the provisions of the Law are subject to public liability, and may be removed and disqualified. Penalties and indemnities shall be deemed tax credits, and therefore, are enforceable through a special proceeding. Final Aspects. To the extent applicable, the law imposes similar obligations on municipalities. Most provisions will be in effect in 2017. The Debt Public Registry should start operating in April 2017. Benefits and Pending Matters.
Please evaluate the student’s project using the criteria below. Please write additional comments. These comments are very important in the evaluation procedure. Please be as candid and thorough as possible. Exceptional Achievement 4 Points Commendable 3 Points Competent 2 Points Not Yet 1 Point Score Total Points Comments Meets goals of proposal and challenge Exceeds goals of proposal; a major challenge Meets goals of proposal; product was a challenge Not applicable Not applicable Work Ethic Prepares questions in advance; extends learning outside meeting times Enthusiastic; knows how and when to ask questions; shows initiative; come ready to work Is enthusiastic but is sometimes late to meetings; asks few questions Does not meet as scheduled; rarely asks questions; lethargic; unenthusiastic; disrespectful Timeliness in completion Product was complete well in advance of due date Product was complete early enough to allow for troubleshooting, adding finishing touches, and evaluation Product was on time, but did not allow extra time for troubleshooting, etc. Product was late, incomplete, or of unacceptable quality Responsibilities on mentor sheet fulfilled Exceeded responsibilities Met all responsibilities on mentor contract Nearly met all responsibilities Did not meet responsibilities on a regular basis Product Quality Craftsmanship demonstrates highly exceptional achievement as measured according to all professional standards for this kind of work Craftsmanship qualities meet the standard for student’s individual learning, skills, and ability levels; use of correct tools, techniques, technology, terminology, and leadership (were applicable) is observed Craftsmanship qualities do not meet the standard for student’s individual learning skills, and ability levels; use of correct tools, techniques, technology, terminology, and leadership (where applicable) lacking Poor or incomplete craftsmanship; clearly below standard for student’s individual learning, skills and ability levels; little or no evidence of use of correct tools, techniques, technology, terminology, and leadership (where applicable)
transaction), total dollar amount reported within Schedule A – Income Statement and payment/contract terms. For related party administrative service expenses, identify those expenses that are allocated to the contractor. For all allocated administrative service expenses, report whether the allocation is based on cost or cost plus. If cost plus, report the percentage above cost. From the list of transactions in Step 9a, select the three highest dollar amount transactions and one other random transaction. Note: include a series of transactions as one transaction for this selection. For the sample of transactions selected in Step 9b, recalculate the total dollar amount reported within Schedule A – Income Statement based upon the payment/contract terms of the agreement between the contractor and related party. List discrepancies and provide contractor’s explanation for such discrepancies. Schedule J - N: Lag Reports Given that the estimation of medical expenses and accruals is a key component to the accuracy of the amounts reported within the Income Statement, Schedules J – N (Lag Reports) are included within the agreed upon procedures. Step 1: Trace and agree the amounts paid for each (Total Paid by Month – Column AN) for the most recent 12 period ending December 31st. Trace and agree each monthly amount to the supporting documentation used by the contractor to complete each lag report. Provide contractor’s explanation for any discrepancies. Trace and agree each monthly amount to the monthly check register or claims system monthly summary. Provide contractor’s explanation for any discrepancies. Obtain representation from the contractor’s management that medical cost is reported net of third party liability (TPL) and coordination of benefits (COB). Provide contractor’s explanation for any discrepancies. Step 2: Trace and agree the amounts paid in the individual cells for the most recent 12 month incurral period ending December 31st. For the claims paid and incurred on Schedules J-N, trace and agree 4 cells from each lag report (a total of 20 cells) to the supporting documentation used by the contractor to complete the lag report. Provide contractor’s explanation for any discrepancies.
Call centre executive training and familiarization with the programme Providing CFI material in local language Monitoring establishment of FLCs at Block / JMLBC level and review Completion of the task and declaring the state as fully saturated (Action – SLBC) Time Line – Pre Launch Function Activities suggested by DFS S.No Task Timeline 1 Meeting of FM with CEOs of Banks 31.07.2014 2 Finalisation of the Mission document(without logo) and circulation to Banks ( with approval of FM) 06.08.2014 3 Last date of receipt of designs for logo 07.08.2014 4 Meeting of the jury to decide the logo 09.08.2014 5 Submission of the jury recommendations 11.08.2014 6 Finalisation of the logo 12.08.201 7 Communication of the logo to the banks to prepare the merchandising material 13.08.2014 8 Completion of SLBC visits by DFS officials 14.08.2014 9 Launch by formal announcement in the independence day speech of Hon’ble PM 15.08.2014 10 Proposed launch function at National, State and District level 28.08.2014 (tentative) Time Line – Post Launch Function Activities S.No Task Timeline 1 Distribution of Financial Literacy and merchandising material to rural bank branches 29.08.2014 2 Start of the account opening camps in states 31.08.2014 3 Target date for coverage of 10520 new SSAs by BCs 31.08.2014 4 Target date for of coverage of 25810 new SSAs and 1.88 crore accounts 31.12.2014 5 Target date for coverage of 40753 new SSAs and 3.75 crore accounts 31.03.2015 6 Target date for coverage of 50000 new SSAs and 5.63 crore accounts 30.06.2015 7 Target date for 7.5 crore accounts(tentative)(Due to connectivity issues actual number may be less and spill over to Phase2) 14.08.2015
In Figure 21.11b, the lower cells are synthesizing signaling molecules, where as the upper cells are expressing receptors for those molecules. In terms of gene regulation, explain how these cells came to synthesize different molecules. The DNA sequences called homeoboxes, which help homeotic genes in animals direct development, are common to flies, mice and humans. Given this similarity, explain why these animals are so different from each other? C. elegans is a model organism for studying apoptosis in the development of animals. Explain the importance of apoptosis in the development of multicellular organisms.
Attorney Date Admitted to CA BAR Member Number Actions Affecting Eligibility (Yes/No?) If “Yes”, attach explanation Larissa Koehler June 2013 289581 No PART IV: OPPOSITIONS AND COMMENTS A. Opposition: Did any party oppose the Claim? No B. Comment Period: Was the 30-day comment period waived (see Rule 14.6(c)(6))? Yes FINDINGS OF FACT EDF has made a substantial contribution to D.17-01-006. The requested hourly rates for Intervenor’s representatives, as adjusted herein, are comparable to market rates paid to experts and advocates having comparable training and experience and offering similar services. The claimed costs and expenses, as adjusted herein, are reasonable and commensurate with the work performed. The total of reasonable compensation is $18,448.75. CONCLUSION OF LAW The Claim, with any adjustment set forth above, satisfies all requirements of Pub. Util. Code §§ 1801-1812. ORDER Environmental Defense Fund shall be awarded $18,448.75.
program that incorporates portions of various parties’ proposals, including, but not limited to, TURNs recommendations to remove DCFCs from the program and limit utility ownership to sites located in multi-unit dwellings (MUDs) and disadvantaged communities (DACs). The Commission also agreed with TURN that the Settlement Agreement had potential anti-competitive impacts. - D.16-12-065, p. 13. - D.16-12-065, p. 30. Size of Program PG&E originally proposed a very large program of up to 25,000 charging stations. As will be discussed in the phasing section below TURN was successful in convincing the Commission to significantly scale back this proposal. PG&E then proposed its enhanced proposal of 7,430 level 2 (L2) charging stations and 100 DCFC. PG&E then reached a settlement with some parties for a program consisting of 7,500 L2 charging stations and 100 DCFC. TURN recommended that the Commission adopt a modified version of PG&E’s compliant proposal, with up to 5000 L2 charging ports and 10 DCFCs. TURN also advocated for the use of multi-port L2 chargers. The Commission agreed that the programs proposed in the Settlement Agreement and in PG&E’s enhanced proposal were too risky and adopted a modified version that utilizes dual port technology for up to 7,500 L2 ports and declined to include any DCFCs. - D.16-12-065, pp. 7-8. - D.16-12-065, p. 10. - Borden Direct Testimony, November 30, 2015, p. 25 (recommending dual-port technology) - TURN Opening Brief, June 17, 2016, p. 13 & 28-29. - TURN Opening Brief, June 17, 2016, p. 19. - D.16-12-065, p. 46, FN. 109. - D.16-12-065, p. 60 & p. 79 FOF #30. Verified Need for a Phased Approach PG&E originally proposed a very large program of up to 25,000 L2 charging stations and 100 DCFCs with a cost of over $650 million. On June 16, 2015, the ALJ issued a ruling requesting comments from parties regarding - D.16-12-065, pp. 7-8. Verified
Name ___________________________________________________ Class ________________ Chapter 7 Study Guide Key Terms and Ideas Chief argument against Constitution used by Antifederalists Connect Shays’ Rebellion to the revision of the Articles of Confederation Constitution – where does the document get its authority? Contrast State Constitutions and the Articles of Confederation DEFINE: bill of rights, compromise, constitution, ratify How can the Constitution be changed? How did the Bill of Rights become part of the Constitution? Importance of Land Ordinance of 1785 Importance of Northwest Ordinance of 1787 Know what was part of the Great Compromise Know what rights are protected by the Bill of Rights (know which rights are protected in specific amendments) What were the major issues that required delegates to compromise at the convention? Why did people want to change the Articles of Confederation? Short Answer Why was the Bill of Rights added to the Constitution? Explain why it was needed and what it would do for the people. Data Based Questions Discuss Noah Webster’s views on states’ rights (quote) Interpret events that led to and followed Shays’ Rebellion (flow chart ) Interpret comparison of Virginia Plan and New Jersey Plan (chart/diagram) Analyze a political cartoon about the development of the federal government (cartoon)
Long Term Role and Impact of Natural Gas in a Context: Energy-Related Environmental Research “Strategic Comparison of the Cost-Effectiveness of Sensor Systems for Methane Emission Detection and Measurement,” $2,700,000 Builds on recent and ongoing research into methane leak detection, taking tools from controlled environments into real-world settings to demonstrate their Field test innovative, low-cost technologies to detect and quantify emissions from super-emitters. Target a region (e.g., Bakersfield) that includes representative natural gas production areas and distribution/end use areas. Measure methane emissions over a sufficient period of time to determine temporal variation in flow rates to inform the state GHG inventory. Long Term Role and Impact of Natural Gas in a Context: Energy Efficiency Research “Water Heating in Existing Buildings,” $910,000 Develop and demonstrate residential hot water distribution retrofits that can reduce water and natural gas use by at least 20%. Improve older, existing, inefficient residential systems, including other improvements such as heat recovery and use of recycled water. The proposed supplemental plan reflects high-priority climate and energy state policy directives and the direction in Resolution G-3519. The supplementary plan essentially directs immediate funding to three project areas: one supporting natural gas inspection tools and technologies, one that advances current methane emission assessment work, and one focusing on the relatively narrow but impactful area of residential hot water heating. We view the proposed research to address these knowledge and innovation gaps as highly important; each project is timely and relevant to key ongoing work at the effective
THE BELFAST AND PROVINCE OF ULSTER DIRECTORY FOR 1852 NAMES - Alphabetically M MacAdam, and Co., oil and bone mills, 31 Donegall Street and Ballymacarrett MacAdam Brothers, and Co., engineers and iron founders, Soho Foundry, Townsend Street MacAdam, John, merchant, Beaver Hall, Ballymacarrett MacAdam, James, of MacAdam Brothers & Co., 18 College Square East MacAdam, James, jun., secretary to the Royal Flax Society, Vice-Consul for Portugal, 7 Commercial Buildings, Beaver Hall, Ballymacarrett MacAdam, Robert, of MacAdam Brothers & Co., 18 College Square East Macartin, James, whitesmith, 27 Green Street Macartney, Andrew, gilder, 29 Academy Street Macartney, Bernard, dealer, 3 Durham Street Macartney, Henry, fish dealer, 5 Kennedy's Place Macartney, James, baker, 58 Union Street Macartney, John N., watch maker, jeweller and optician, 6 Donegall Place Macartney, John, forge and proprietor of Ship Hotel, 27 Pilot Street Macartney, Thomas, fireman, 25 Police McCracken, Alexander, foreman boot and shoe maker, 23 Russell Street McCracken, A., boot and shoe maker, 28 Bridge Street, 2 Rosemary Street McCracken, Anne Jane, milliner, 3 Crown Entry McCracken, Francis, jun., cotton spinner, 8 York Lane, 91 Donegall Street McCracken, Henry, grocer and publican, Trainview Cottage, Ballymacarrett McCracken, James, weaver, 53 Old Lodge Road McCracken, James, carpenter, 37 Stanley Street McCracken, James, scantling yard, Falls Road McCracken, James, builder and grocer, 29 and 31 Barrack Street McCracken, John, general dealer, 15 Brown Street McCracken, James, brick layer, 14 Little Edward Street McCracken, John W., notary public, 25 Corporation Street, 141 York Street McCracken, Joseph, spirit dealer, 66 Brown Street McCracken, Joseph, day constable, 81 Durham Street McCracken, Malcolm, boot and shoe maker, 3 bridge Street, 54 Great George's Street
3. Date NOI filed: January 5, 2014 Verified 4. Was the NOI timely filed? Yes Showing of customer or customer-related status (§ 1802(b)): 5. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding number: R.14-07-002 Verified 6. Date of ALJ ruling: December 18, 2014 Verified 7. Based on another CPUC determination (specify): n/a 8. Has the Intervenor demonstrated customer or customer-related status? Yes Showing of “significant financial hardship” (§ 1802(g)): 9. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding number: R.14-07-002 Verified 10. Date of ALJ ruling: December 18, 2014 Verified 11. Based on another CPUC determination (specify): n/a 12. 12. Has the Intervenor demonstrated significant financial hardship? Yes Timely request for compensation (§ 1804(c)): 13. Identify Final Decision: D.16-12-036 Verified 14. Date of issuance of Final Order or Decision: December 22, 2016 Verified 15. File date of compensation request: February 21, 2016 Verified 16. Was the request for compensation timely? Yes II: SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION Did the Intervenor substantially contribute to the final decision (see § 1802(i), § 1803(a), and D.98-04-059). Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) Specific References to Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) CPUC Discussion (A) Competitive solicitation framework development, including participation in the NRDC provided “Method 5” of the five CFSWG Report recommendations cited in the Decision (D.16-12-036, pp.18-20) to avoid the double-counting of services provided. NRDC argued that one of the key criteria Verified
APPENDIX Compensation Decision Summary Information Compensation Decision: D1704036 Modifies Decision? Contribution Decision(s): D1612036 Proceeding(s): R1401003 Author: ALJ Kelly A. Hymes Payer(s): Pacific Gas and Electric Company, San Diego Gas & Electric Company, Southern California Edison Company, and Southern California Gas Company Intervenor Information Intervenor Claim Date Amount Requested Amount Awarded Multiplier? Reason Change/Disallowance Natural Resources Defense Council February 21, 2017 $23,937.50 $23,487.50 N/A Intervenor Compensation Preparation Hourly Rate Reduction Advocate Information First Name Last Name Type Intervenor Hourly Fee Requested Year Hourly Fee Requested Hourly Fee Adopted Merrian Borgeson Expert NRDC $190.00 2016 $190.00 Merrian Borgeson Expert NRDC $200.00 2017 $200.00 (END OF APPENDIX)
1. 230V socket. For connection of the device to be controlled. 4. Off/On button. For programming and to manually turn off/on the power. 2. Detector eye. Receives IR signal. 5. 3.5mm jack. For connecting an external control switch or external detector eye. 3. Indication light. Connection Make sure that the device to be connected, that has its own power switch is set to “on”. This is easiest done by connecting to a wall socket and ensure that the device is on (for example a lamp should be lit). Connect the Andromeda Socket to a wall socket. Connect the device to be controlled to the socket on the relay unit (1). Make sure that the device gets power by pressing the Off/On button (4). If IR is used, keep in mind that the range will be reduced if the detector eye (2) is covered or hidden in some way, for example by curtains or furniture. Program the relay unit by following the instructions in the next chapter. The Andromeda Socket comes factory set with GewaLink channel 16 and bistable function. The relay unit does not need to be programmed if it is the function and channel to be used on the IR transmitter. Programming The Andromeda Socket can be programmed for the following use: IR control with GewaLink channels Radio control (Z-Wave) Control switch Warning! The relay is activated during the programming. This may cause an inadvertent activation of some equipment.