Annex II: QCPR MONITORING & REPORTING FRAMEWORK # OP Indicator Source/ Collection method Frequency Baseline Target II Funding of operational activities for development II. A. General principles 1 24 Total funding for UN operational activities for development. CEB Financial DB and reporting system; Annually $23.879 billion 2 11, 24 % share of UN-Operational Activities for Development relative to total ODA. 1) CEB Financial DB and reporting system; 2) OECD.Stat Annually 17.0% 3 11, 24 % share of UN-Operational Activities for Development relative to total multilateral ODA. 1) CEB Financial DB and reporting system; 2) OECD.Stat Annually 29.1% 4 24, 33, 77 Total funding from non-OECD/DAC countries (excluding local resources) CEB Financial DB and reporting; Annually $1.193 billion 5 24, 33, 77 % share of funding from non-OECD/DAC countries relative to total estimated global South-South cooperation flows (excluding local resources) 1) CEB Financial DB and reporting system; 2) IDCR Annually 9.1% 6 24, 37 Total funding received from non-state partners. CEB Financial DB and reporting system; Annually $5.946 billion 7 24, 37 % share of total funding for UN Operational Activities for Development coming from non-state partners. CEB Financial DB and reporting system; Annually 24.9% II.B. Enhancing the overall funding, in particular core resources 8 25, 33 Total core funding for UN Operational Activities for Development CEB Financial DB and reporting system; Annually $6.709 billion 9 26, 29 % core share of funding for development-related activities from governments (excluding local resources). CEB Financial DB and reporting system; Annually 45.9% 10 27, 28, 44 % share of non-core resources for development-related activities channeled to pooled, thematic and joint-funding mechanisms applied at the global, regional and country-levels. CEB Financial DB and reporting system; Annually 10.2% 11 118, 124(g), 135, 141 % of programme countries where over 20% of UN resources relate to joint programmes and are subject to pooled or pass-through and/or MDTF fund management arrangements (as against parallel funding) 1) RCAR* 2) CEB Financial DB and reporting system; 3) MPTF Office Annually 23.9%
III Capacity Development & Operational Effectiveness III.A. Capacity-Building and Development 23 14, 57-63 % of new UNDAFs or equivalents that substantively address national capacity development Desk review by Regional UNDG (PSG) Annually 24 57-63 % of programme country Governments that 'strongly agree' that UN system has been effective in developing national capacities DESA programme country survey Every two years 24.1 in 2012 25 64 % of programme country Governments that 'strongly agree’ that UN system uses national monitoring and reporting systems wherever possible DESA programme country survey Every two years 52.8 26 64, 66 % of programme countries who 'strongly agree’ that the UN system avoided using parallel implementation units (PIUs) wherever possible DESA programme country survey Every two years 27 63 Common approach and framework to measure progress in capacity development results developed UNDG/UPN One time No Yes 28 63 Average % of agency country offices using the common UNDG capacity measurement approach (when fully developed) Coordination support survey supplemented by DESA desk review of agency annual reports Annually (once fully developed) Null 29 14, 15 Three dimensions of sustainable development reflected in strategic plans of UNDG members DESA desk review of agency strategic plans Every two years III.B. Poverty Eradication 30 70, 71 % of new UNDAFs or equivalents that substantively address poverty eradication Desk review by Regional UNDG (PSG) Annually 31 19,73 % of programme country governments who “strongly agree” that UN contributions in the eradication of multi-dimensional poverty and achievement of IDGs is “significant” DESA programme country survey Biennial III.C. South-South Cooperation and Development of National Capacities 32 74,77 # of UN entities that integrate south-south cooperation into their strategic plan. DESA desk review of agency strategic plans Every two years 33 74 ,77 # of UN entities that actively report on south-south cooperation in their annual reports DESA desk review of agency annual reports Every two years 34 74,77 % of new UNDAFs or equivalents that substantively address south-south and triangular cooperation Desk review by Regional UNDG (PSG) Annual ly
70 134 # of Delivering as One countries RCAR* Annually 71 134 # of countries applying components of the SOPs RCAR* Annually 72 130(b) % of countries with an annual UN Country Results Report RCAR* Annually 79.8% (2013) 73 138 % of programme countries that considered adopting Delivering as One that were satisfied with information provided to them by the RC/ UNCT to enabling them to take an informed decision on Delivering as One DESA programme country survey Every two years 74 141 # of RCs/ UNCTs who state that in regard to DaO they have received effective support from headquarters Coordination support survey Annually 75a 137 UNDG approved HQ Plan of Action to address challenges and bottlenecks, in particular at the headquarters level, which prevent the Delivering as One countries from fully utilizing the efficiency gains from the delivery as one approach DOCO One time 75b UNDG implemented HQ Plan of Action to address Challenges and bottlenecks, in particular at the headquarters level, which prevent the Delivering as One countries from fully utilizing the efficiency gains from the delivery as one approach Annually (starting in 2015) 76 143 and Options for the review and approval of the common country programme documents of the “Delivering as one” countries presented to ECOSOC in 2014 Jointly by UNDP, UNICEF, UNFPA and UN-Women One time (in 2014) IV.D. Regional Dimensions 77 146 147 # of joint RCM/R-UNDG regional common positions (papers) to advocate on key development issues RCM/R-UNDG work plans and reports Annually 78 148 149 % of UNCTs that ‘strongly agree’ with the statement that the Peer Support Group provides value-added to the formulation of the UNDAF. Coordination support survey Annually 79 146-150 % of RCs or UNCTs stating that RCMs provides effective support on highest priority regional/sub-regional issues of relevance to the country. Coordination support survey Annually 80 146-150 % of RCs or UNCTs stating that regional UNDG provides effective support on the highest priority regional/sub-regional issues of relevance to the country Coordination support survey Annually 81 146-150 % of RCs/UNCTs stating that regional commissions provide effective support on the highest priority regional/sub-regional issues of relevance to the country Coordination support survey Annually IV.E. Simplification and Harmonization of Business Processes