zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Definitions and Abbrevations: 1.1: List of Definitions Close Proximity P2P Kiosk downloading and file exchange between two electronic products such as smartphones, digital cameras, camcorders, computers, TVs, game products, and printers are the representative use cases for close proximity P2P applications. Data Center Network The term Data Center Network describes the entire networking infrastructure inside a Data Center. It comprises both links between racks as well as links of servers inside those racks. Communication Intra-device communication is a communication link within a device and includes inter-chip communication to allow for pin count reduction.
300 0,38 4,49 19,12 0,39 4,46 18,87 400 0,38 4,35 18,37 0,37 4,33 18,28 Calculation of Attenuation due to Clouds and Fog A calculation method is described in ITU-R 840-6 [5.5]: The specific attenuation within a cloud or fog can be written as: dB/km (5.12) c : specific attenuation (dB/km) within the cloud Kl : specific attenuation coefficient ((dB/km)/(g/m3)) M : liquid water density in the cloud or fog (g/m3). At frequencies of the order of 100 GHz and above, attenuation due to fog may be significant. Typical water content for different fog types are listed in table 5.5. Table 5.4: Typical liquid water density of fog types [5.5] Fog type Typical liquid density in g/m3 medium fog (visibility of the of 300 m) 0.05 thick fog (visibility of the order of 50 m) 0.5 A mathematical based on Rayleigh scattering, which uses a double-Debye model for the dielectric permittivity ( f ) of water, can be used to calculate the value of Kl for frequencies up to 1000 GHz: (dB/km)/(g/m3) (5.13) where f is the frequency (GHz), and: (5.14) The complex dielectric permittivity of water is given by: (5.15) (5.16) 0 = 77.66 + 103.3 ( – 1) (5.17) 1 = 0.0671 (5.18) 2 = 3.52 (5.19) = 300 / T (5.20)
Data Center Network References [3.1] Application Requirements Document, IEEE 802.15-15-0304-14-003d [3.2] Ken Hiraga, Masasih Shimizu, Toshimitsu Tsubaki, Hideki Toshinaga and Tadao Nakagawa, “Real usage of the kiosk downloading,” IEEE80.15-14-0298-00-003d, Beijing, Mar 2014. [3.3] M. Yaita, H. Song, A. Kasamatsu, I. Hosako, “Measured wave propagation characteristics under KIOSK use case”, IEEE80.15-15-0869-00-003d, Dallas, November 2015. [3.4] Danping He, K. Guan, B. Ai, Z. Zhong, A. Kasamatsu, H. Ogawa, I. Hosako, M. Yaita “Kiosk Channel Modeling”, IEEE80.15-16-0168-02-003d, Macau, March 2016. [4.1] A. Fricke, “Measuring the Terahertz Intra-Device Propagation Channel”, IEEE Berlin, March 2015 [4.2] A. Fricke, S. Rey, M. Achir, P. Le Bars, T. Kleine-Ostmann, T. Kürner, "Reflection and Transmission Properties of Plastic Materials at THz Frequencies", 38th International Conference on Infrared, Millimeter and Terahertz Waves, Mainz, September 2013 [4.3] A. Fricke, “Direct and Directed NLOS Channel Measurements for Intra-Device Communications”, IEEE 802.15-15-0528-00-003d, Waikoloa Village, July 2015 [4.4] R. Jones, “A new Calculus for the Treatment of Optical Systems”, Journal of the optical Society of America, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 500-503, 1941
that no valid nominations were received in the election; and (ii) giving further notice of election in accordance with regulation 11. (2) In the case of an election of the non-advocate members, if only one valid nomination is received— election manager must notify the Board immediately after the nomination day; and Board must cause a notice to be published in the Government Gazette as soon as practicable after the nomination day— that the candidate nomination was received is elected; and (ii) in relation to the vacancy that has not been filled, giving further notice of election in accordance with regulation 11. 15 Uncontested elections If the number of nominations received for an election is equal to the number of vacancies to be filled, the election manager must— a notice in the Government Gazette declaring the candidate or candidates elected; and a copy of the notice to the Board. 16 Contested elections
(RoF) technologies and their applications”. [3] T. Kuri et al. “Proposal of “Radio over X” and “Modulation-Symbol-Format Maintaining Transmission” for the next generation mobile services ”, IEICE Technical Report, CS2014-17, July 2014. [4] Recommendation ITU-T G.989.1, “40-Gigabit-capable passive optical networks (NG-PON2): General requirements”. [5] Radio Regulation, Edition 2012. [6] IEEE 802.15-14-0022-00-0thz, “Application of RoF-Based Terahertz Fronthauling using Optical Sub-Harmonic IQ”, January 2014. [7] IEEE 802.15-0177-02-003d, “RoF-Based Terahertz Fronthaul for Mobile/Wireless Access Systems”, March 2014. [8] IEEE 802.15-0177-0003d, “RoF-Based Terahertz Fronthaul for Mobile/Wireless Access Systems”, May 2014.
statutory rules 2015 S.R. No. 68/2015 Electricity Safety Act 1998 Electricity Safety (Bushfire Mitigation) Amendment Regulations 2015 The Governor in Council makes the following Regulations: Dated: 23 June 2015 Responsible Minister: LILY D'AMBROSIO Minister for Energy and Resources YVETTE CARISBROOKE Clerk of the Executive Council 1 Objective The objective of these Regulations is to amend the Electricity Safety (Bushfire Mitigation) Regulations 2013— prescribe the information about accepted bushfire mitigation plans which major electricity companies must make publicly available; and amend the prescribed standards for inspection of private electric lines. 2 Authorising provision These Regulations are made under section 157 of the Electricity Safety Act 1998. 3 Commencement
bare open wire has the same meaning as in the Electricity Safety (Installations) Regulations 2009; conductor spreader has the same meaning as in the Electricity Safety (Installations) Regulations 2009; hazard tree means a tree referred to in clause 8 of the Code; horizontally constructed has the same meaning as in the Electricity Safety (Installations) Regulations 2009.". ═══════════════
each proposal when possible. This document is to be used as a comparison basis for the merging/down-selection process. Functionalities from the TGD Functionality NICT OKI ETRI 1(Hybrid L2R) ETRI 2 (TCT) Mesh topology discovery Yes (enhanced beacons) Topology: Hierarchical mesh tree Yes (Hello frames) Topology: Tree Yes (PANN and PANN RP) Topology: Tree Yes (Link setup request/response) Tiered cluster tree Mesh Routing Yes -US: Hop-by-hop from child to parent or brother using neighbor table -DS: * Hop-by-hop parent to or brother using neighbor table, * Proactive source routing -P2P: Combination of US and DS Yes -US: Hop-by-hop child to parent using neighbor table -DS: source routing -P2P: Combination of US and DS Yes -US, DS: using routing table -P2P: establishment with PREQ and PREQ RP, then Hop by hop using routing table Yes -US, DS, P2P: using cluster table and route table Extensible mesh routing architecture (metric alternative, selection, notification, new metrics) Using the Link quality metric field in EB for 1 or more metrics Using the Neighbor metric container in Hello frames for 1 or more metrics Using the Metric field in PANN and PREQ for 1 metric Unicast Yes Yes Yes Yes Broadcast Yes: packet forwarded once if at 1 child exists Flooding with random jitter Route discovery Proactive Proactive US/DS: proactive P2P: reactive Proactive Low operation To see from the simulations results Mesh Security Only devices from the same PAN sharing the same KMP
security credentials can belong to a routing tree Routing metrics Any metric. SINR used in simulation Any metric. Hop count used in simulation Inactive Overhead Aware Link Metric -Link cost: Function of link type, link quality, load balance -Route cost: number of hops Discovery and association EBR/EB Hello request/Hello PANN/PANN RP Link setup request/ link setup response Network acknowledgement Not specified E2E-ACK Not specified Not specified Addressing 16/64 bits 16/64 bits 16/64 bits 16 bits (c-skip) Changes to the MAC and PHY New IEs -HMT construction IE -L2R routing IE -Data aggregation IE -Destination announcement IE New IE with nested IEs -L2R IE *Address list IE *Hello Param IE *Routing Instance IE *Hello request parameter IE record parameter IE *MGT request parameter IE *MGT response parameter IE *KMP parameter IE *FA notification parameter IE *FA channel update IE *MC request parameter IE *MC response parameter IE *Neighbor metrics container IE *PIB ID list IE *KMP content IE New control frames - PANN - PANN-RP - PREQ - PREQ-RP New IEs -L2R IE *setup req *release req *Hello req *setup resp *release resp *hello resp -L2R payload IE *Cluster req *Update req *Leave req *flow req *cluster resp *Update resp *leave resp *flow_resp
concludes that it is unnecessary to maintain the transmitter ID requirement whose purpose was to avoid interference.) - No network identifier shall be included. - Network topology is always limited to two active devices. - No mechanisms for multiple-access nor bandwidth reservation. - No CSMA/CA and no periodic transmissions such as beacons after link establishment. Note: When the transmission time is sufficiently short (e.g., < 1sec), the system can regard the channel response as constant and beacon transmission is not necessary. . - Link shall be disconnected immediately when the devices are drawn apart. Example of detection of device approach: utilization of near-field communication (NFC) As described above, fast link establishment within the required time duration is required in the kiosk application. In addition to link establishment realized purely through 60 GHz, communications (NFC) can also be used to assist in detecting the approach of a portable terminal towards a kiosk terminal. NFC is widely used at the toll gates in train stations and the NFC modules are included in most cellular phone terminals. Figure 9 illustrates the link setup utilizing NFC. When the user’s portable terminal approaches and enters the NFC communications range, the NFC modules of both sides establishes communications and the passive module inside the portable terminal turns on the 60 GHz module within the same portable terminal. Next, the 60 GHz modules complete their own link setup and start the data transfer. The NFC communications may also be used for user identification (authentication/authorization). In such case, the kiosk terminal may determine which file is to be transferred to the user after the user identification. The NFC communications can also execute payment functions. Figure detection of approach NFC Spatial division transmission method for 100 Gbps To attain higher throughput, higher multilevel modulation and spatial division multiplexing such as MIMO should be utilized. shows the combination of modulation and MIMO for higher transmission rates.This table is based on the frequency channels for the 60-GHz band shown in . By utilizing MIMO, more than 100 Gbps rates becomes possible. As described above for the kiosk application, the propagation channel will not be multipath-rich. Thus the use of short-range MIMO transmission employing appropriate element spacing in the array antennas is effective [5]. Without spatial division but only multilevel modulation and channel aggregation, it is difficult to achieve 100 Gbps. 1024-QAM with four-channel aggregation can only provide 45 field
Radiocommunication Study Groups Source: Document 1A/TEMP/57 (edited) Annex 2 to Document 1A/166-E 24 June 2014 English only 2 to Working Party 1A Chairman’s Report ITU-R Technology trends of active services in the band above 275 GHz Scope This Report contains technology trends of active services in the band above 275 GHz. This Report intends to provide technical information for preparation of sharing and compatibility studies between active and passive services, as well as among active services in the band above 275 GHz. Abbreviations and acronyms ATR Attenuated Total Reflection spectrometry BNA N-Benzyl-2-Methyl-4-Nitroaniline BWO Backward-Wave Oscillator DAST Diethylaminosulfur Trifluoride DFG Difference Frequency Generation FEL Free-Electron Laser FTIR Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy HBT Heterojunction Bipolar Transistor HEMT High Electron Mobility Transistor IMPATT Impact Ionization Avalanche Transit-Time LoS Line of Sight LT-GaAs Low Temperature grown Gallium Arsenide MMIC Monolithic Microwave Integrated Circuit NEP Noise Equivalent Power NFC Near Communication NLoS Non Line of Sight QCL Quantum Cascade Laser RTD Resonant Tunnelling Diode TDS Time Domain Spectroscopy TNNNET Tunnel Injection Transit-Time THz Terahertz
2 Use case of content synchronizationwith the cloud through near field communication 2 Typical requirements Communication distance Up to a few cm (proximity) Data speed 4 Gbps – a few tens of Gbps Propagation environment Inter-device proximity model (LoS) Required BER 8% PER (before retransmission control) 3.1.3 Wirelesscommunication between servers inside a data center Figure 3 shows a use case ofTHz communication between servers inside a data center. Recently, services utilizing the cloud have been rapidly increasing and have accelerated the construction of data centers. Generally, several server racks equipped with various servers including storage and multiple switches can be found in data centers, and it is desirable that the wiring between servers within server racks and the wiring between racks be made wireless. Table 3 shows the typical requirements in this use case. Communication distances from a few cm, assuming connection between servers arranged vertically within server racks, to a few m assuming connection between racks. Regarding the propagation environment, it is necessary to consider both LoS and NLoS which assumes an office model where building materials with comparatively low permeability (high reflectivity) are utilized, but if we envision a special case where the server rack is placed near the wall surface and cable connections between rear panels are replaced by THz communication link, a two-model can be applied between rear panels. 3 Wireless communication between servers inside a data center 3 Typical requirements Communication distance A few cm – a few m (proximity) Data speed A few tens of Gbps – a few hundreds of Gbps Propagation environment Office model/two-model (LoS/NLoS) Required BER 8% PER (before retransmission control)
amend the Education and Training Reform Act 2006 in relation to the constitution of boards of TAFE institutes; and amend various university Acts in relation to the constitution of councils of universities; and make related consequential amendments and miscellaneous amendments to those Acts. 2 Commencement (1) Subject to subsection (2), this Act into operation on a day or days to be proclaimed. (2) If a provision of this Act does not come into operation before 1 September 2016, it comes into operation on that day. 3 Principal Act In Parts 2 and 3 of this Act, the Education and Training Reform Act 2006 is called the Principal Act. 2006 4 TAFE institute and boards (1) After section 3.1.11(2)(f) of the Principal Act insert— "(fa) make provision for—
In clause 1(1) of Schedule 1 to the Federation University Australia Act 2010— paragraph (b), for "effect." substitute "effect;"; paragraph (b) insert— elected member elected by staff of the University holds office for a term, not exceeding 3 years, fixed by the Council in accordance with the university statutes and any university regulations; elected member elected by students of the University holds office for a term, not exceeding 2 years, fixed by the Council in accordance with the university statutes and any university regulations.". 40 Members eligible for reappointment In clause 2(1) of Schedule 1 to the Federation University Australia Act 2010, after "reappointed" insert "or re-elected". 41 Filling of vacancies on retirement In clause 5 of Schedule 1 to the Federation University Australia Act 2010, after "appointment" insert "or election". 42 New clauses 6 and 7 inserted in Schedule 1 After clause 5 of Schedule 1 to the Federation University Australia Act 2010 insert— "6 Conduct of elections Elections of members of the Council are to be conducted in accordance with the
president (however designated) of the academic board or its equivalent. government appointed members are— least 3 persons appointed by the Governor in Council under section 12(1); and person appointed by the Minister under section 12(2). Council appointed members are the persons appointed by the Council under section 13. number of government appointed members must be to or greater than the number of Council appointed members. the members referred to in subsection (1)(b) and (c)— 2 must be persons with financial expertise with relevant qualifications or experience in financial management; and must be a person with commercial expertise at a senior level.". 49 Specific subject matter for university statutes and university regulations
0 H0 0 H0 21 symbols of PHR at the appropriate PHR modulation rate for BPM-BPSK modulation mode 42 symbols of PHR at the appropriate PHR modulation rate for OOK modulation mode 1 H1 H0 H1 2 H2 H1 H0 H2 3 H3 H2 H0 H3 … … … … 16 H16 H15 H14 H16 17 H17 H16 H15 H17 18 H18 H17 H16 H18 19 D0 H18 H17 D0 20 D1 D0 H18 D1 21 D2 D1 D0 D2 N symbols of data at the data rate for BPMBPSK modulation mode 2 × N symbols of data at the data rate for OOK modulation mode … … … … N + 17 DN-2 DN-3 DN-4 DN-2 N + 18 DN-1 DN-2 DN-3 DN-1 N + 19 T0 DN-1 DN-2 T0 N + 20 T1 T0 DN-1 T1 Note for the BPM-BPSK modulation mode g0 is the position bit and, g1 is the polarity bit. Table 2 –mapping of header bits, data bits and tail bits onto symbols with Viterbi rate 1 Symbol # data g0 g1 0 H0 0 H0 21 symbols of PHR at the appropriate PHR modulation rate for the BPM-BPSK modulation mode 1 H1 H0 H1 2 H2 H1 H0 H2 3 H3 H2 H0 H3 … … … … 16 H16 H15 H14 H16 17 H17 H16 H15 H17 18 H18 H17 H16 H18 19 T0 H18 H17 T0 20 T1 D0 H18 T1 21 D0, D1 D0 D1 N/2 symbols of data at the data rate for the BPM-BPSK modulation mode 22 D2, D3 D2 D3 … … … … N/2 + 19 DN-6, DN-5 DN-6 DN-5 N/2 + 20 DN-4, DN-3 DN-4 DN-3 N/2 + 21 DN-2, DN-1 DN-2 DN-1
An Initial Proposal of Reference Architecture for TG4s (15-15-027) Use Case 2: Anomaly Detection Co-existing networks, e.g. IEEE802.11 and 15.4e (ISA100.11a), are able to the alien system information each other. Increased noise energy using energy detection Overlapping network activity carrier sense Jabber or jamming node may be detected. Suspicious behavior or ordinary mobile demeanor of alien node can be estimated. Sometimes notification storm has to be suppressed, e.g. mobile worker carrying wireless gadgets. Security threat may be alleviated, for instance; detection of “replay attack” node detection of “active spoofing” node Figure 3 Anomaly detection Vigilance of Spectrum Resource in private facilities for network stability and security Use Case 3: Resource management for Network () is composed of multiple PANs When a new smart meter (end point) is installed, it will join one of those PANs in their footprints Selection and reselection of the PAN to be joined is determined with certain criteria Structure of RF mesh changes from time to time Stable performance among multiple PANs is desired Well-balanced SRU (Spectrum Resource Usage) is desired for each end point to show as much the same performance as possible regardless of the available PANs Instantaneous QoS fluctuation should not affect the behavior of those end points Figure 4 Network Use case proposal for Technical Guidance Document (15-15-177)
macSRMcapable Boolean TRUE, FALSE If TRUE, the device is capable of functionality specific to SRM FALSE SRM PIB Attribute Type Range Description Default macChannelLoad Enabled Boolean TRUE, FALSE If TRUE, the device is using functionality specific to Channel Load - macLinkStatistics Enabled Boolean TRUE, FALSE If TRUE, the device is functionality specific to Link Statistics - macInterference MeasurementEnabled Boolean TRUE, FALSE If TRUE, the device is using functionality specific to Interference Measurement - macNodeStatistics Enabled Boolean TRUE, FALSE If TRUE, the device is using functionality specific to Node Statistics - macChannelOccupancy StatisticsEnabled Boolean TRUE, FALSE If TRUE, the device is using functionality specific to Channel Occupancy Statistics - macWakeup StatisticsEnabled Boolean TRUE, FALSE If TRUE, the device is using functionality specific to Wakeup Statistics - macTimeSynchError Enabled Boolean TRUE, FALSE If TRUE, the device is using functionality specific to Time Synch Error - macSecurityEnabled Boolean TRUE, FALSE If TRUE, the device is using functionality specific to SRMM Security - macLatencyEnabled Boolean TRUE, FALSE If TRUE, the device is using functionality specific to Network Latency -
macSRMcapable Boolean TRUE, FALSE If TRUE, the device is capable of functionality specific to SRM FALSE SRM PIB Attribute Type Range Description Default macChannelLoad Enabled Boolean TRUE, FALSE If TRUE, the device is using functionality specific to Channel Load - macLinkStatistics Enabled Boolean TRUE, FALSE If TRUE, the device is using functionality specific to Link Statistics - macInterference MeasurementEnabled Boolean TRUE, FALSE If TRUE, the device is using functionality specific to Interference Measurement - macNodeStatistics Enabled Boolean TRUE, FALSE If TRUE, the device is using functionality specific to Node Statistics - macChannelOccupancy StatisticsEnabled Boolean TRUE, FALSE If TRUE, the device is functionality specific to Channel Occupancy Statistics - macWakeup StatisticsEnabled Boolean TRUE, FALSE If TRUE, the device is using functionality specific to Wakeup Statistics - macTimeSynchError Enabled Boolean TRUE, FALSE If TRUE, the device is using functionality specific to Time Synch Error - macSecurityEnabled Boolean TRUE, FALSE If TRUE, the device is using functionality specific to SRMM Security - macLatencyEnabled Boolean TRUE, FALSE If TRUE, the device is using functionality specific to Network Latency -
• Provision numbers All provision numbers included in an Act form part of that Act, whether inserted in the Act before, on or after 1 January 2001. Provision numbers include section numbers, subsection numbers, paragraphs and subparagraphs. See section 36(3C). • Location of "legislative A "legislative item" is a penalty, an example or a note. As from 13 October 2004, a legislative item relating to a provision of an Act is to be at the foot of that provision even if it is preceded or followed by another legislative item that relates to that provision. For example, if a penalty at the foot of a provision is followed by a note, both of these legislative items will be regarded as being at the foot of that provision. See section 36B. • Other material Any explanatory memorandum, table of provisions, endnotes, index and other material printed after the Endnotes does not form part of an Act. See section 36(3)(3D)(3E). 2 Table of Amendments This publication incorporates amendments made to the Jury Directions Act 2015 by Acts and subordinate instruments. ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Jury Directions Act 2015, No. 14/2015 Assent Date: 12.5.15 Commencement Date: S. 81 on 20.6.15: s. 2(4) Note: S. 81 repealed Pt 10 (ss 69–81) on 29.6.16 Current State: This information relates only to the provision/s amending the Jury Directions Act 2015 Crimes Amendment (Sexual Offences) Act 2016, No. 47/2016 Assent Date: 6.9.16 Commencement Date: Ss 27(2), 28(2)–(4) on 26.9.16: Special Gazette (No. 289) 20.9.16 p. 1 : This information relates only to the provision/s amending the Jury Directions Act 2015
Note Section 14 requires the trial judge to give this direction, if requested, unless there are good reasons for not doing so. Section 16 requires the trial judge to give a direction if the trial judge considers that there are substantial and compelling reasons for doing so. (2) Without limiting section 14, it is a good reason for not giving the requested direction if the trial judge considers that there is no substantial risk that the jury might use the evidence as tendency evidence. 30 Abolition of common law rules (1) Except as provided by this Division, a trial judge is not required to direct the jury regarding the use of other misconduct evidence. (2) Any rule of common law to the contrary of this section is abolished. Note Section 4 applies generally to override any rule of law or practice to the contrary of this Act. Division 3—Unreliable evidence 31 Definition In this Division— evidence of a kind that may be unreliable includes— in relation to which Part 3.2 (hearsay evidence) or 3.4 (admissions) of the Evidence Act 2008 applies; and
evidence of an accused is less credible, or requires more careful scrutiny, because any person who is on trial has an interest in the outcome of that trial. Notes 1 Section 7 provides for correction of statements or suggestions to the contrary of this provision. 2 The trial judge, the prosecution and defence counsel (or, if the accused is unrepresented, the accused) may say or suggest that a witness, or an accused, has a particular interest in the outcome of the trial and this interest does or may affect the credibility of the witness or the accused. S. 44I inserted by No. 37/2017 s. 5. 44I Direction on accused giving evidence or interest of accused in outcome of trial (1) Defence counsel may request under section 12 that the trial judge direct the jury on either or both of the following— giving of evidence by the accused; interest that the accused has in the outcome of the trial. (2) In giving a direction referred to in subsection (1), the trial judge must explain that— accused is not required to give evidence; and fact that the accused has given evidence does not change the prosecution's obligation to prove that the accused is guilty; and
RCC Capabilities 0x27 8 O8 O8 O8 7.4.1.13 [B2], 3.9.1 RCC UL UL RCCN Descriptor 0x28 ≥13 M 7.4.1.14 6.2.9 RCC UL, MAC UL Global Time 0x29 4 M 7.4.1.15 RCC UL UL Header Termination 1 0x7e 2 O9 O9 O9 O9 O9 7.4.2.16 7.4.1 ALL UL, MAC UL, MAC Header Termination 2 0x7f 2 7.4.2.17 7.4.1 ALL UL, MAC UL, MAC Group Payload IE Table Payload IEs - Group ID Length ≤2049 Enh Beacon Enh Ack Data Multipurpose Command Formatting subclause(s) Use Description subclause(s) Apps/Modes used by RX: Used by TX: Built by Encapsulated Service Data Unit (ESDU) 0x0 ≥3 O11 O11 7.4.3.1 Container for UL data ALL UL UL MLME 0x1 Nested IEs + 2 O12 O12 7.4.3.2 Container for Nested IEs ALL UL, MAC UL, MAC Vendor Specific 0x2 ≥6 O13 O13 7.4.4.30 Proprietary ALL UL UL 3 3 1 1
Channel Timing Management (CTM) 0x32 ≥18 M 7.4.3.25 6.16 TVWS UL UL Timestamp 0x33 M 7.4.3.26 6.9.5 TVWS MAC MAC Timestamp Difference 0x34 6 M 7.4.3.27 6.9.5, 6.7.2.4 TVWS MAC MAC TVWS multichannel cluster tree PAN (TMCTP) Specification 0x35 ≥5 M 7.4.3.28 5.8.1.3, 6.13 TVWS UL UL RCC PHY Operating Mode 0x36 6 7.4.3.29 6.10 RCC MAC UL Nested Payload IEs – Long Nested IEs - Long Sub ID Length <2049 Enh Beacon Enh Ack Data Multipurpose Command Formatting subclause(s) Use Description subclause(s) Apps/Modes used by RX: Used by TX: Built by Vendor Specific 0x8 ≥6 7.4.4.30 Proprietary All UL UL Channel Hopping 0x9 3, ≥18 M 7.4.3.31 6.3.6, 6.3.4, 6.2.10 TSCH, ALL MAC MAC IE Termination Explanation The following section explains how to terminate IE lists, when termination is required, and those allowed cases that are not non-best practices. Name Header IEs Present Payload IEs Present Data Payload Present Header IE Terminations (HT1, HT2) Payload IE Termination (PT) Case No No No None None Case 2 Yes No No None None Case 3 No Yes No HT1 Optional Case 4 Yes Yes No HT1 Optional Case 5 No No Yes None None Case 6 Yes No Yes HT2 None Case 7 No Yes Yes HT1 PT
IEEE P802.15 Wireless Personal Area Networks Project IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Title TG3e Technical Guidance Document Date Submitted May, 2015 Source Andrew Estrada E-mail: Andrew.Estrada@am.sony.com Re: Abstract TG3e System Requirements and Evaluation Criteria to be developed Purpose Supporting document for the development of the amendment 3e of IEEE 802.15.3 Notice This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15.
References [Ref. PAR] https://development.standards.ieee.org/get-file/P802.15.3e.pdf?t=85386600003 [Ref. CMD] 15-15-0279-02 “3e Channel Modeling Document (CMD)” [1] TG6 Technical Requirements Document IEEE 802. 15-08-0644-08-0006 [Ref_11-00-0294-00] 11-00-0294-00, “Suggested PA Model for 802.11 HRb” [Ref_15-04-0255-00] 15-04-0255-00-003a-proposal-comparison-summary Annex A. Simulation scenarios The performance simulations shall include the implementation impairments of the followings such as power amplifier non-linearity and phase noise models. A.1 Simulation overview PHY simulation should be done in such scenarios as listed below. – Simulation Overview -- Carrier frequency offset Phase noiseNoise figure Antenna gain Channel Simulation configuration Each model is described below. A.2 Power amplifier (PA) nonlinearity In order to model the nonlinearity of the radio-frequency (RF) power amplifiers (PA), a modified RAPP model shall be used as follows. Saturation of amplitude, or AM-AM conversion, is modeled by using [Ref_11-00-0294-00] , where Vout is amplitude of output voltage of RF signal, Vin is the amplitude of input voltage of RF signal, Vsat is the limiting output amplitude (saturation level), and p is the smoothness parameter (typically 2 ~ 3) defining the transition smoothness from the linear region to the saturated region. On the other hand, phase shift due to the nonlinearity of the amplifier, or AM-PM conversion, is modeled using this modified RAPP model[Ref_15-04-0255-00] . Here,α, β, and q are parameters for adjusting the descending slope to an appropriate one. Specify backoff from full saturation used in the simulation calculated as PA Backoff = –10 log10 (Average TX Power/Power at saturation) for each rate. A.3 Carrier frequency offset
Agenda Monday 9 March, PM1 Review DF4 - Security section Tuesday, 10 March, PM1 Review DF4 - IE section Wednesday 11 AM1 Review DF4 - CSMA figures and text Wednesday 11 March, PM1 Review DF4 - TSCH Thursday 12 March, AM1 Discussion on LLDN and indirect transmission for broadcast frame Thursday 12 AM2 Review DF4 Thursday 12 March, PM1 Review DF4 Thursday 12 March, PM2 BRC formation, approval of draft, conf call scheduling for this meeting slot is to review the security section of DF4 Clause 9 9.2.1: Define KeyIndex, etc for when a frame is sent automatically take the PIB entries and are set to those values Correct spelling of “addressing” Add text to explicitly that the steps are followed in orderChange phrase “failed status” to “status set to failed”DONE: In 9.2.1, fix spelling of Addrressing DONE: Auxilliar, Auxiiliary, check elided DONE: set to thecorresponding 9.2.3: Change phrase “not set to zero” to “set to one” Change phrase “frame to be secured” to “frame to be validated” and “unsecured frame” to “validated frame”DONE: 9.2.3, change "not set to zero" to be "set to one" here and in 9.2.4. DONE: 9.2.3 Head field -> Header field 9.2.3 Check to see what the correct way to do Source PAN ID with PAN ID
Comment Text in PAR/CSD Remarks / Answers to the Comments Responses to IEEE 802.3 comments • What is the revision plan for IEEE Std It appears that there are two approved amendments IEEE Std and IEEE Std plus an exising amendment project. The 4th amendment will be subject to the requirement to revise the standard after three years and three amendments. An extension can be requested, but the PAR should not be approved without knowing the revision plan. The plan is to open a 15.3 Revision PAR in July and proceed with the Revision right away before either amendment. We would include the fixes that are currently in the 15.3e PAR so those do not get lost and we would update the 15.3d PAR so everything is consistent. The revision 64 bit MAC addresses to 48 bit MAC addresses. at the amendment level so this would be much simpler and . • The P802.15.3d PAR should never have been approved as submitted. The 15.3e PAR fixes these problems but if 15.3e is approved first, these fixes and Scope and Purpose changes would then be backed out by 15.3d. – This makes the two projects contingent in some way that the PAR form is equipt to handle. – A modified PAR should be submitted for 15.3d to change Scope and Purpose language to refer to the standard, not the project. This could be part of the revision plan (modified PAR or conversion of 15.3d into a revision will be submitted when approval order is clear.) – Both PARs should clearly indicate that if 15.3d is approved after 15.3e the scope and purpose should not change from that specified in 15.3e. Noted. • 2.1 (non substantive) — The correct format is “Amendment: <amendment name>”, not “Amendment for <amendment name>”. Noted. • 5.1 — It be unusual for participants to increase from in activities (as indicated in the CSD) to the 50 indicated in the PAR. For 802, the resonse should relate to the TG doing the work, not the number of WG members. 5.1 Approximate number of people expected to be actively involved in the development of this project: Action: Accept Change: In section 5.1, change "50" to "30".
research laboratories, semiconductor manufacturers, communication equipment manufacturers, system integrators and end users. Participants in the standard include chip vendors, chip designers, technology suppliers, radio frequency (RF) equipment manufacturers, infrastructure providers, international wireless carriers/service providers, academic researchers, government research laboratories, semiconductor manufacturers, communication equipment manufacturers, system integrators and consumers. 1.2.4 don’t list the corporations in the CSD, but do cite reference to the evidence alluded to. 1.2.4 Technical Feasibility Each proposed IEEE 802 LMSC standard shall provide evidence that the project is technically feasible within the time frame of the project. At a minimum, address the following items to demonstrate technical feasibility: Demonstrated system feasibility. The sequence of link setup, data transfer and link release occurring within a short duration has already been demonstrated for wireless communication systems by Sony, Toshiba and others. Proven similar technology via testing, modeling, simulation, etc. Similar main components of the technology and signaling are being used in today’s systems by Sony, Toshiba and others. Hence, the involved testing overhead associated with a commercial development undertaken by manufacturers is known to be reasonable. Action: Revise CSD 1.2.4a and b to read as follows. Demonstrated system feasibility. The sequence of link setup, data transfer and link release occurring within a short duration has already been demonstrated for point-to-point wireless communication systems by a number of multimedia organizations and universities such as TU Braunschweig. Proven similar technology via testing, modeling, simulation, etc. Similar main components of the technology and signaling are being used today in proprietary commercial systems and in research laboratories at University institutions such as TU Braunschweig. 1.2.5c) do not use “Wi-Fi” change to “WLAN” or delete Consideration of installation The installation of fixed standalone terminals would be similar to that of installing Wi-Fi access points and when included in devices like ticket gates would not add to the installation cost of that gate Action: Accept. Change “Wi-Fi” to “WLAN”
Beacon downlink uplink S1 ... Sn-r-1 GACK Sn-r+1 Sn A1 ... Am present if macLLDNmgmtTS = TRUE macLLDNnumTimeSlots macLLDNnumUplinkTS macLLDNnumBidirectionalTS time
The LL Beacon frame is sent during the beacon slot in every superframe. The LL Beacon frame shall be formatted as illustrated in Figure 48c. Octets: 1 0/1 0/1/5/6/10/ 14 1 1 1 1 0/1 variable 2 Frame Control Sequence Number Auxiliary Security Header LLDN PAN coordina- tor ID field Configuration Sequence Number Timeslot Size Number of Base Timeslots in Superframe Group Acknow- ledgment FCS MHR MAC Payload MFR Figure 48c—Format of the LL Beacon Frame The order of the fields of the LL Beacon frame shall conform to the order of the general LLDN frame as illustrated in Figure 48a. The LL Beacon frame has a short MHR containing the Frame Control field of one octet. In the Frame Control field, the Frame Type field shall contain the value that indicates an LLDN frame, as shown in Table 2, and the Frame Subtype field shall contain the value that indicates an LL Beacon frame, as shown in Table 3c. The Flags field contains control information. The structure of the Flags field is shown in Figure 48d. Bits: 0–2 3 4 5–7 Transmission State Transmission Direction Reserved Number of Base Timeslots per Management Timeslot Figure 48d—Structure of Flags field of LL Beacon frame The Transmission State field defines the transmission state. The values for the different transmission states are specified in Table 3d. Table 3d—Transmission State settings Bits 0–2 Transmission 000 Online State (described in )
macLLDNtime- SlotInfo Imple- men- tation Information related to a timeslot, for instance, MAC addresses mapped to the timeslot. For the LLDN PAN coordinator, there are macLLDNnumTimeSlots attributes of macLLDNtimeSlotInfo. Set during ration macLLDN- discoveryMode- Timeout Integer 0…256 The LLDN coordinator switches from the Discovery state into the Configuration state after it did not receive a Discover Response Frame within the last macLLDNdiscoveryModeTimeout seconds. 256 macLLDN- coordinator TRUE or Indicates whether the LLDN device is the LLDN PAN coordinator FALSE D.7.3.1 MAC sublayer functions To Editor: Insert the following rows in Table D.as MLF 16a between ”MLF15 TSCH Capability“ and „MLF16 DSME capabilities“: Table D.—MAC sublayer functions Item number Item description Reference Status Support N/A Yes No LL Capability Table 8b O LL-MAC Management Services , :M LL commands :M LL: LL-Discover Response command, , FD1:M LL-Configuration Status command, , FD2:O LL-Configuration Request command, , FD3:O Clear To Send (CTS) Shared Group command, , FD4:O Request To Send command, (RTS) , FD5:O Clear To Send command FD6:O
Figure 12: Schematic diagram of the channel for 60 GHz close proximity Model Parameterization List of Parameters The complete list of parameters used in this document can be summarize as follows: 1. K, K factor of Rice distributions for the first arrival tap 2. , the decay rate for the delayed taps 3.  initial between the first tap and delayed taps As simulation scenario, there above parameters are introduced under the conditions that polarizations between the transmitter and the receiver are aligned. Parameterization for 57 – 66 GHz Proposer shall report values of parameters, K, γ, δ, that is used in the performance evaluation simulation. Simulation Scenario In this section, we describe how to simulate multipath fading effects on transmission performance of proposed wireless system in IEEE802.15.3e. These scenarios are for reference only; other scenarios which provide the same principle as the following will be admissible. Maximum tap space Regarding signal bandwidth (BW), 15.3e channel models assume that maximum tap spacing can be represented by , (4) where N 2. BW is assumed to be 1.76 GHz in IEEE802.15.3e, so tap-space can be calculated to be 0.2841 nsec. Concerning the case where signal bandwidth is expanded due to channel bonding, tap spacing, tap-space, shall be reduced by the factor of 2Bonding-BW/BW, where Bonding-BW is the new signal bandwidth. Number of multi-path The number of multi-paths varies depending on the environment. Based on initial measurements the number of multi-paths are counted to be about between 1 to 8. We suggest that the number of multi-paths be arranged related to reflective objects around a transmitter and a receiver.
phyRxRmarkerOffset Unsigned Integer The propagation time from the receive antenna to the internal receiver timestamp. The units of this are defined in 10.4.1. The PD subtracts this offset from its internal receive timestamp to get the reported RxRangingCounter value. macRngAckRrtiSupport Boolean READ ONLY Read only value indicating whether the PD is able to generate an RRTI IE within the standard ACK response time and insert it into a ranging ACK frame. macRngAckRrtiEnable Boolean When set the PD MAC shall automatically generate and insert an RRTI IE in a ranging ACK frame, where the RFRAME being acknowledged carried an RRRT IE and where macRngAckRrtiSupport indicates that the PD is capable of doing this. macRngMinRrtiTime Unsigned Integer READ ONLY This is a read only reporting the minimum RX to TX response time that the PD supports for inserting an RRTI IE into a MAC data frame. The units of this are defined in 10.4.1. A value of zero shall indicate that the PD cannot support RRTI insertion, i.e. so the upper layers know to employ an RRTD IE in the ranging exchanges. macRngRrtiTime Unsigned Integer This sets the desired RX-to-TX response time for the PD to use when inserting an RRTI IE into a MAC data frame. The units of this are defined in 10.4.1. The value set should take account of the macRngMinRrtiTime and any upper layer delays in initiating transmission, be reflected in the preferred response time indicated via RPRT IE exchanges. A (informative) The mathematics of two-way ranging Single-sided two-way ranging error due to clock offset With reference to Figure 7, the times Tround and Treply are measured independently by device A and B using their respective the local clocks, which have some clock offset error eA and eB from their nominal frequency. As a result Tprop is then actually: And, the in the range estimate equation (given in 2.3.2) is: Or:
Length Sub-ID Type = 0 Descriptor Mesh Root Address Entity ID List Depth TC IE Interval MCO Descriptor DAgg Buffering Time Security Level PQM List Path to Root Replace “Sequence number” with “MSN” in clause 6.2.2.5 Replace “Sequence number” with “LSN” in: Figure 46 clause 6.2.6.5 Figure 52 Clause 6.2.8.6 Figure 60 Clause 6.2.12.2 Replace “SN” with “LSN” in: Figure 51 Clause 6.2.7.1 clause 6.2.7.2 Replace “L2R Sequence Number” with “LSN” in: Figure 56 Clause 6.2.10.5 Figure 59 Clause 6.2.11.3 Replace “L2R SN” with “LSN” in: Figure 62 Clause 6.2.13.2 Set all the LSN sizes to 2 octets in all IE concerned
R16 3 3.1 44 Is a mesh root restricted to enabling access to just one entity? Explain why, or modify definition R18 3 3.1 50 mesh tree providing connectivity connectivity to what? R37 10 4.3 38 "A mesh tree is organized into a hierarchical mesh tree" Circular characterization <unnecessary for a tree> R41 10 4.3 52 is allowed by the mesh root Explain motivation for the restriction R42 10 4.3 52 is allowed by the mesh root device to decide for itself R75 21 5.2.1 35 Section cross-reference needed for discussion section 5.4.1.4 R80 23 5.2.1 51 'N' conflicts with rows 9 and 10 of table 3 Pick new variable for one of the 'N's R104 34 5.3.3 14 What reasons are NOT good reasons for recovery? Give some examples, or reword sentence. R113 39 5.4.1.4 15 "E2E Retry Limit are set by the device forwarding the aggregated frame" This makes the individual payloads NOT E2E. R161 53 6.2.1.1 25 "backhaul" is undefined Create definition (or Resolution: AiP CIDs R16, R18: Definition for mesh root should allow for connectivity to one or more services. Replace definition of mesh root as follows: “Device with the 0 in a L2R mesh providing access to a service. It may act as a gateway connecting to one or more external services.” CID R37: Statement is redundant and amounts to a circular definition.
Simultaneous Communication with Multiple Transmitters The standard may support interference coordination techniques to deal with simultaneous communication with multiple coordinated/uncoordinated transmitters, which is referred to as multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO). It may support cooperative signal processing among multiple transmitters with negligible impact on latency. The standard may support efficient and reliable feedback and control channels for rate adaptation, multiple user support and cooperative signal processing. This information may be available to other fixed and mobile devices in the network. Waveform The standard will employ at least one PHY mode that uses variable current modulation. Metric Reporting The High Speed Photodiode Receiver may report the following performance metrics to the upper layer via a standardized interface with minimized overhead and low latency: Information about SINR Information about temporal characteristics Signal blocking conditions, frequency of signal losses Signal decay time Low Speed Photodiode Receiver Applications/Use cases The following Low Speed Photodiode Receiver applications/use cases were presented in response to TG7r1 Call for Applications. C1 Underwater/Seaside Communication [8] C2 secure point-to-(multi)point communication [5, 8, 9] C3 Digital signage [5, 8, 17] C4 D2D/IoT [5, 9] C5 LOS Authentication [5, 17] C6 Identification based service [20, 21]
short-term mooring area means an area subject to a set aside determination which allows vessels to be moored in that area at certain specified times or for certain specified periods, but does not include a permit-only mooring area; the Act means the Port Management Act 1995; transport safety officer means a person appointed under section 116 of the Transport (Safety Schemes Compliance and Enforcement) Act 2014; vehicle has the same meaning as in the Road Safety Act 1986 but does not include a vessel; wharf includes a pier, jetty, pontoon, quay, breakwater or boardwalk. 6 Certain regulations and other instruments prevail The following regulations and instruments prevail over these Regulations to the extent of any inconsistency— regulations or other instruments made under the Marine Safety (Domestic Commercial Vessel) National Law; regulations or other instruments made under the Marine Safety Act 2010;
WISCASSET BOARD OF SELECTMEN, BOARD OF ASSESSORS AND OVERSEERS OF THE POOR JULY 21, 2015 Tape recorded meeting Present: Bill Barnes, David Cherry, Vice Chair Judy Flanagan, Chair Ben Rines, Jr., Jeff Slack and Town Manager Marian Anderson Ben Rines, Jr. called the meeting to order at 6 p.m. Jeff Slack moved to enter executive session pursuant to Title 1, §405C, Discussion of disposition of publicly held real estate – Wiscasset Primary School. Ben Rines, Jr., said it was his understanding that when the board was ready, the property would be put out to bid and that in his opinion it was premature to meet with a realtor. In the discussion that followed, the following points were made: It was not mandatory that the property be put out for bid; it could be listed with a broker; having a broker involved would be helpful in determining the market and setting a price even if the property were put out to bid; listing with a broker would reach more potential buyers than putting it out to bid; the goal should be to maximize the sale price and add the property to the tax rolls. It was also suggested that a long term lease might be investigated if the town wanted to retain ownership and still have income. Vote 3-2-0 (Barnes and Rines opposed). 1. Call to Order Chairman Ben Rines, Jr. called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Public Hearing – None 4. Approval of the Minutes David Cherry moved to accept the minutes of July 7, 2015 as amended by Judy Flanagan and Ben Rines, Jr. Vote 5-0-0. 5. Approval of Treasurer’s Warrants Judy Flanagan moved to approve the Payroll Warrants of July 10 and July 17, 2015. Vote 5-0-0. Bill Barnes moved to approve the Accounts Payable Warrants of July 14, and July 21, 2015. Vote 5-0-0. 6. Assessors’ Business – none 7. Special Presentations or Awards – none 8. Appointments Jeff Slack moved to approve the appointments of R. B. “Jib” Fowles and John A. Reinhardt to the Historic Preservation Commission. Vote 5-0-0. 9. Resignations – none