zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
The appropriateness of measures for selecting and/or involving participants in the mobility activities The proposal clearly defines the criteria on the basis of which each organisation will select staff to participate in mobility activities. The criteria are fair and transparent and allow for selecting individuals whom the project aims to address and with a high potential of achieving the intended learning outcomes. N.B. The mobility of adult learners cannot be supported. If applicable, the quality of cooperation and communication between the participating organisations, as well as with other relevant stakeholders The proposal shows that appropriate cooperation arrangements are established between the participating organisations. It indicates appropriate channels for communication between the participating organisations. The proposal shows that the distribution of responsibilities and tasks of all participating organisations is balanced. The quality of measures for evaluating the outcomes of the project The proposal includes adequate measures for evaluating the outcomes of the project, in particular the quality of the learning outcomes of mobility activities and the effectiveness of support measures put in place by the participating organisations, as well as the outcomes of the project as a whole. The potential impact of the project on participants and participating organisations during and after the project lifetime The project is likely to have a substantial positive impact on the participating organisations and participants. The project results will be integrated into the management and/or pedagogical/curricular framework and practice of the participating organisations. The proposal describes the measures that will be taken to ensure lasting effects of the project, including after the end of the project. In the long-term perspective, the project will benefit learners of the participating organisation. The potential impact of the project outside the organisations and individuals directly participating in the project, at local, regional, national and/or European levels The project is likely to benefit individuals and organisations other than those directly participating in the project. Relevant potential beneficiary organisations and individuals are identified in the proposal. The appropriateness and quality of measures aimed at disseminating the outcomes of the project within and outside the participating organisations The proposal includes a clear and good quality plan for the dissemination of the project results, concretely describes the dissemination activities and identifies the right target group(s) of these activities. The proposal includes proactive measures that will be taken to reach out to the target groups. If applicable, the project makes use of EPALE to disseminate project results in addition to use of the Erasmus+ Project Results Platform.
DISTRICT-WIDE MANAGERS’ MEETING Fall 2017 Meeting October 6, 2017, CCC Herndon Campus, Room 308 AGENDA 8:00 a.m. – 8:15 a.m. Continental Breakfast 8:15 AM – 8:20 AM Welcome & Today’s Agenda Stacy Zuniga, EEO/Diversity & Staff Development Manager 8:20 AM – 8:30 AM Chancellor’s Message Dr. Paul Parnell, Chancellor 8:30 AM – 8:45 AM Student Story Monique Program Development Assistant – CalWORKs (FCC) 8:45 AM – 9:00 AM Budget Update Ed Eng, Vice Chancellor of Finance and Administration 9:00 AM – 10:00 AM State Center Federation of Teachers (SCFT)/Academic Senate L. Lacy Barnes, President SCFT Stephanie Curry, Academic Senate President – Reedley College Liz Romero, Academic Senate President – Clovis Community College Bruce Hill, Academic Senate President – Fresno City College 10:00 AM – 10:10 AM Break 10:10 AM – 11:00 PM FERPA - Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (ASCIP) Kristine Kwong, Esq. Musick, Peeler & Garrett, L.L.P. 11:00 AM - 12:30 PM New NeoGov Evaluation Tracking Software Training Samerah Campbell, Director of Human Resources Brittany Needham, Resources Management Systems (HRMS) Analyst Lopez, Human Resources Technician 12:30 PM Adjourn
G. Ratings of Project Performance in ISRs No. Date ISR Archived DO IP Actual Disbursements (US$, millions) 1 09/08/2005 Satisfactory Satisfactory 0.00 2 09/23/2005 Satisfactory Satisfactory 0.00 3 04/13/2006 Satisfactory Satisfactory 0.00 4 09/12/2006 Satisfactory Satisfactory 0.60 5 04/02/2007 Satisfactory Moderately Unsatisfactory 0.60 6 10/05/2007 Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory 3.60 7 06/02/2008 Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory 5.69 8 12/31/2008 Satisfactory Moderately Unsatisfactory 7.68 9 06/11/2009 Moderately Satisfactory Moderately Unsatisfactory 8.43
10 10/06/2009 Moderately Satisfactory Moderately Unsatisfactory 10.66 11 06/07/2010 Moderately Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory 20.37 12 07/05/2011 Moderately Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory 34.95 13 01/21/2012 Moderately Unsatisfactory Moderately Unsatisfactory 40.21 14 12/19/2012 Moderately Unsatisfactory Moderately Unsatisfactory 44.16 15 07/08/2013 Moderately Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory 55.22 16 01/01/2014 Moderately Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory 60.41 17 06/01/2014 Moderately Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory 70.42 18 12/12/2014 Moderately Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory 79.12 19 06/15/2015 Moderately Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory 88.06 20 12/08/2015 Moderately Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory 99.43 21 04/06/2016 Moderately Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory 116.72 H. Restructuring (if any) Restructuring Date(s) Board Approved PDO Change ISR Ratings at Restructuring Amount Disbursed at Restructuring in US$, millions Reason for Restructuring & Key Changes Made DO IP 10/14/2012 MU MU 43.4 Changes were made to increase the percentage of expenditures to be financed under the loan from 70% to 90%, reallocate the loan proceeds among categories of expenditures, and as amend Schedule 4, Section III-I of the Loan Agreement based on the revised procurement plan, to identify the number of contracts subject to the World Bank’s prior review. 3/20/2014 MS MS 65.99 Extend the loan closing date and reallocate loan proceeds among different categories of expenditures. Improvement of the Results Framework. 01/17/2016 MS MS 101.96 Reallocation of the loan proceeds different categories of expenditures to help finance procurement of emergency pumps and spare parts for large pumping stations to ensure sustainability of investments under the project. I. Disbursement Profile
2012-2014 Issues Committee Roster Committee Name: Mail Order Food Safety Committee Last Name First Name Position (Chair/Member) Constituency Employer City State Telephone Email Applewhite Christine Regulator State of Connecticut Department of Public Health 410 Capitol Avenue, MS#11FDP Hartford CT 860-509-7302 Christina Vice-Chair Food Service Industry Little Caesars Enterprises, Inc. 2211 Woodward Avenue Detroit MI 502-594-5915 Auffray Anthony Member Retail Food Industry Amazon.com 207 Avenue N Seattle WA 206-740-8581 Reyes Jennifer Member Retail Food Industry Target 1000 Nicollet Mall TPN1366 Minneapolis MN 612-696-5942 Baum Mitzi Member Food Service Industry Feeding America 35 E Wacker Drive Chicago IL 312-641-6842 Harris Andrew Member Local Regulator Summit County Public Health 1867 West Market Street OH 330-812-3962 Whiting Kelli Member Local Regulator Marion County Public Health Department 3840 N. Sherman Indianapolis IN 317-221-2256
Lee Aimee member Retail Food Industry Publix Supermarkets Two Lakepointe Plaza; 4135 S. Stream Blvd., Charlotte NC 704-424-5017 Manuel Clyde member Retail Food Industry Sealed Air Corp. 901 Renaissance Boulevard Sturtevant WI 262-321-3794 Moretz Mark At-large, member Retail Food Industry Sealed Air Corp. 1155 Sterling Pointe Dr. King NC 336-529-1815 Pearson Alli At-large, member Food Service Industry Neogen Corporation 620 Lesher Place Lansing MI 517-372-9200 Hallowell Ashley At-large, member Food Service Industry Aramark 1101 Market Street Philadelphia PA 1 2/15/2017
formation of the toxin that causes botulism. For this reason, as a general rule, the USDA FSIS recommends a minimum of 120 ppm of ingoing nitrite in all cured "Keep Refrigerated" products. To ensure that a minimum ingoing amount of 120ppm sodium nitrite is in the product or to ensure the amount is as permitted per 9 CFR 424, the facility must attach recipes (including ingredients and amounts of ingredients). The recipes will be used by the health authority to calculate the ingoing amount of nitrite in the food. D.6. Record Provide a blank curing log used for monitoring the measurement of each batch of cured product as part of this document. A record of scale calibration, curing salt measurements, corrective actions, and supervisor verifications is kept on this single form. Specifically, the following information must be included on the log: Date, Scale Calibration, Recipe name, Weight of Curing Salts, Weight of Meat/Poultry, Brine amount, Other ingredients, Corrective Action, Initials or Signature of the Processor and Initials or Signature of the Person in Charge. Note: Once records are created they MUST be kept for 6 months and made available to the RA upon inspection request. E. Training Each employee who will have responsibility for making and measuring curing salts is REQUIRED to receive training such that they understand the hazards and controls and that they may perform their role in this Single Hazard Special Process HACCP Template. THE PIC must review section C and D with employees and complete a hands-on training for section D. Provide a training log form as an attachment to this Single Hazard Special Process HACCP Template. The training sessions must be recorded in this log, and must include date, employee name in attendance, and instructor. Maintain the training log as an additional appendix to this Single Hazard Special Process HACCP Template. F. Standard operating procedures For the Regulatory Authority to list. Are there any SOPs required or recommended that will make this Single Hazard Special Process HACCP Template safer? Such as: cleaning and sanitizing food contact surfaces, personal hygiene, hand washing, eliminating bare hand contact, proper chemical/nitrite storage
Food Contact Surface "Food-contact surface" means: (1) A surface of equipment or a utensil with which food normally comes into contact; or (2) A surface of equipment or a utensil from which food may drain, drip, or splash: (a) Into a food, or (b) Onto a surface normally in contact with food. 2013 FDA Food Code 1-201.10 Also referred to as “hard food contact surfaces”. EPA regulated application. Food Contact Surface Sanitizer An antimicrobial/sanitizer used on a hard food contact surface. Food Contact Substance A food contact substance is any substance intended for use as a component of materials used in manufacturing, packing, packaging, transporting, or holding food, if such use is not intended to have any technical effect on such food FDA Guidance (FFDCA § 409(h)(6)) Food Contact Substance Antimicrobial A food contact substance, as above, used as a sanitizer/antimicrobial directly in/on food. FDA Guidance Excluded from the definition of "pesticide chemical" under 201(q)(1)(B)(i) of the FFDCA, as amended by ARTCA, are antimicrobial substances applied on food, or added to water that comes into contact with the food in the preparing, packing, or holding of food for commercial purposes. EPA/FDA Jurisdiction Table Antimicrobials Treatments (Food Use) Category Jurisdiction Comments Treatment of RAC’s except in a food processing facility EPA
Strategy 9: Codes establish minimum standards for parks and open space in new developments, which includes developing around existing civic gathering spaces.,, 1,2 Engaging and Connecting Community Members Through Planning and Policies Do planning documents or local government policies support development of spaces? Strategy 10: Plans identify potential areas for traditional neighborhood development. 1,2 Strategy 11: Plans encourage a mix of uses and space for social gatherings, such as parks, churches, community centers, schools, and other facilities, in new neighborhood developments. 1,2 Strategy 12: The community owns or has a long-term on properties for a centrally located venue such as a stage, farmers’ market, park, or other gathering space. 1,2 Strategy 13: Identify or provide public space for a community garden. 1,2 Do planning processes or government policies promote strong community engagement? Strategy 14: Hold regular community meetings, in locations and at times that allow people on different schedules and in different parts of the community to attend, to encourage public participation in developing plans and other land use regulations. 1,2,3 Strategy 15: Translate public meeting materials into the languages used by predominant minority populations in the community. 1,2,3 Strategy 16: Translation services are available for meetings where attendees speak English as a second language. 1,2,3 Strategy 17: The local government or a partner conducts community assessments, such as walking audits, to collect information about local needs and opportunities. 1,2,3 Strategy 18: Form citizen advisory councils community-wide, or for individual neighborhoods to provide input on development review and policy decisions.132 1,2 Strategy 19: Surveys elicit feedback from residents on various community issues. 1,2,3 Strategy 20: Websites, social media tools, or public access television stations provide broadcasts or recordings of community meetings for those unable to attend in person. 1,2,3 Strategy 21: The local government or a partner distributes a weekly bulletin of community meetings via email, local paper, direct-mailers, or others forms of communication accessible to everyone. 1,2,3 Engaging and Connecting Community Members Through Programs and Services
or curricular – and therefore no mathematical – structure exists for the educational production process. There is educational policy research that refers to the significant influences of community, household, and peer characteristics; but, no universally accepted definitions for the accurate measurement of these characteristics. Context for Student Effort Analysis: Rocky Times in Rocky Top Most importantly, the one assumption that typically is ignored – and bothers the %#$^% out of me – but has profound ramifications for any research involving student learning outcomes and educational productivity is:
1997 -.106 .250 * -.031 -.291 * -.009 4.334 * 2.405 1998 -.049 .295 * -.215 * -.055 -.041 6.057 * 2.486 1999 .047 .456 * -.054 -.248 * -.091 7.055 * 2.414 2000 .098 .447 * -.114 -.147 -.120 6.004 * 2.603 2001 -.123 .319 * -.059 -.240 * -.118 4.471 * 2.359 2002 -.200 .203 # -.077 -.226 * .026 5.012 * 2.406 2003 -.137 .337 * -.040 -.266 * -.053 5.211 * 2.210 * denotes statistical significance at the .05 # denotes statistical significance at the .10 Incorporating Levels of Student Effort into Educational Production Functions I had – and have – lots of questions: In of what issues, concepts, or theories is “student effort” framed? How does the research literature define “student effort?”
Ulteriori Letture Palmer, Stephen and Whybrow, Alison et al (2008), ‘Handbook of Coaching Psychology’ Un libro di riferimento, se piuttosto arido e accademico, che copra le psicologie di coaching da una prospettiva di tipo della British Psychological Society convenzionale. I capitoli 1 e 2 forniscono una panoramica utile del coaching come professione. Peltier, (2010), ‘The Psychology of Executive Coaching’ Un equivalente centrico- USA . Alcuni dicono che è più facile da leggere. Passmore, Jonathan (Editor, 2014), ‘ Immergiti secondo i tuoi interessi, ad es. capitoli su psicodinamica, gestalt, psicologia positiva, coaching neuroscientifico, cognitivo-comportamentale e consapevole. Ulteriori riferimenti Assagioli, Roberto (1991), ‘Transpersonal Development’ Bly, Robert (1988), ‘A little book on the human shadow’ Ferrucci, Piero (1982), “What We May Be: The Vision and Techniques of Psychosynthesis” Howard, (2015) “Bringing a psycho-spiritual perspective to executive coaching”, Paper for APECS Symposium 2015 (pdf) Kahneman, Daniel (2012) “Thinking Fast and Slow” Kets de Manfred (2006): ‘The Leader on the Couch’ E.C. (1991) “A Gestalt Approach to Organisational Consulting” Wilber, K. (2000) “A Theory of Everything”
College of Science and Engineering All Departments OFFICE HAZARD ASSESSMENT Hazard Category Potential Hazards Control Office Equipment File cabinets Furnishings Copiers, fax machines, printers Computers, TV/VCR/DVD player Small appliances cutters, staplers, hole punchers, paper shredders Conducting maintenance or repairs on energized electrical equipment edges/points/corners: paper cutters, paper shredders, Exacto knives, hole punchers, staplers Unsecured file cabinets, bookcases, and storage cabinets Open file drawers Damaged furnishings; i.e., chairs, desks Overhead storage practices Secure filing cabinets, bookcases and storage cabinets Routine documented safety inspections Assess storage practices Provision of appropriate sized ladders and step stools Documented training regarding: Department orientation Office safety Ladder safety Safety inspection Basic electrical safety Chemical Exposure Common office products with hazardous ingredients: Cleaning supplies Office equipment chemicals (toner, ink) Paints, adhesives Correction fluids board markers, cleaner Lack of appropriate safety data sheets (SDS) Unlabeled chemical containers Improper use of chemicals Lack of adequate ventilation Hazard Communication Program Labels for secondary containers SDS system Documented training regarding: o Hazard communication Emergency situations such as: Fire Earthquake Severe weather Bomb threat Incomplete/un-posted evacuation plans Lack of procedures Lack of employee training for fire extinguishers, evacuation procedures, emergency response Lack of equipment for emergency response Emergency Action Plan Routine documented safety inspections Documented emergency response drills Documented training regarding: Emergency response Fire extinguisher
a Biohazard doorcard is posted Containment Level PI/Alternate Contact and Hazardous agents procedures b NFPA doorcard is current c Emergency assistance information is posted d Emergency contact hours/weekends/holidays and reporting information are posted e Other (specify): Section 3B: Laboratory Design N/A 1 0 C Comments/Corrective Actions Completed a Control Access (type) key keycode proximity card (specify): b Lab door is self-closing c Lab door is kept closed while experiments are in progress (a must for BSL2+) – no doorstop d Ceiling is intact (e.g. no holes, no cracks, no missing tiles, etc. For new BSL2 approval, smooth, cleanable or e Wall is intact (e.g. no no cracks, etc. For new BSL2 approval, durable glossy acrylic or epoxy paint.) f Floor is intact (e.g. no holes, no cracks, etc. For new BSL2+ lab, monolithic or sealed, coved) g Windows are not recommended. For windows that open to the exterior, must be fitted with screens h Illumination is adequate; no reflections or glare to impede vision i Work area is accessible for cleaning j Work area has no raw wood/cardboard/paper/rugs k Non-porous casework/shelves l Benchtops impervious to water and resistant to chemicals (no old desks or meeting tables, exposed wood) m Non-porous chair including stools n Sink is available with papertowels and soap manual hands-free automatic Location if not inside containment:
IMPACT & IMPLEMENTATION REPORT – SUMMARY SECTION (For AEMO to complete and administer) Issue Number IN017/13, IN039/12, IN008/14, IN003/14, IN002/14, IN004/14 and IN005/14 Impacted Jurisdiction (s) VIC, NSW/ACT, QLD and SA Proponent Tim Sheridan Company AEMO Affected Gas Markets(s) Retail Consultation process (Ordinary or Expedited) Expedited Industry Consultative forum(s) used GRCF Date Industry Consultative forum(s)consultation concluded 23 May 2014 Short Description of change(s) Retail Market Procedure (RMP) Changes 2014 (Package 2) Procedure(s) or Documentation impacted Refer to artefacts listed in section 2 of this Impact and Implementation Report (I&IR) Summary of the change(s) The proposed amendments are non-material documentation only changes that remove redundant provisions and increase consistency in the RMPs and technical supporting documents for each of the retail gas markets. I&IR Prepared By Tim Sheridan Approved By Fiona Savage Date I&IR published 2 May 2014 Date Consultation 135EE or 135EF concludes 23 May 2014 Contact address for written responses Tim Sheridan, Australian Energy Market Operator, GPO Box 2008, Melbourne VIC 3001 Email Address for Responses key contact information IMPACT & IMPLEMENTATION REPORT – DETAILED REPORT SECTION
Impact and Implementation Report (IIR) response template. Issue # IN007/18 – Amend How Water Estimation Methodology in RMP Review comments submitted by: <insert company name> Contact Person: <insert contact name> Date: <insert date> Please complete sections 1 and 2. Section 1 - General Comments on the IIR Topic Please Provide Response Here Sections 1 to 11 of the IIR sets out details of the proposal. Does your organisation supports AEMO recommends that the changes be made as proposed in this IIR? If no, please specify areas in which your organisation disputes AEMO recommends (include IIR section reference number) of the proposal and include information that supports your organisation rational why you do not support AEMO recommends. Section 2 – Specific comments regarding RMPs and GIP/SP ***Participants are to complete the relevant columns below in order to record their response.*** RMP or ref Issue / Comment Proposed text Red strikeout means delete and blue underline means insert Rating (H/M/L) AEMO Response (AEMO only)
G. Are personnel following the agency policy for transmitting FTI via fax? (policy in preliminary section) Section 9.4.4 V. Disposing Federal Taxpayer Information (Publication 1075 section 8.0) IRC Section 6103(p)(4)(F) Section 8.0 Objective: To determine if FTI is disposed of properly. A. Does the agency return FTI to the IRS when no longer needed? Sections 8.1 8.2 B. Does the agency destroy paper FTI in accordance with Pub 1075? Sections 8.3 8.4 C. Does the agency destroy electronic FTI in accordance with Pub 1075? Sections 8.3 8.4 D. Does the agency sanitize physical media containing FTI before it leaves the physical or systemic control of the agency? Section 8.3 E. Does the agency ensure FTI is not disclosed during disposal processes? Section 8.4 VI. Computer System Security Section 9.0 Objective: To determine if computer security requirements are met to adequately protect FTI. A. Does the agency perform vulnerability assessments in accordance with Pub 1075? Section 9.3.14.3 B. Does the agency require multi-factor authentication for remote access in accordance with Pub 1075? Section 9.3.1.12 9.3.7.2 9.3.9.4 9.4.13 C. Does the agency encrypt FTI in the LAN in accordance with Pub 1075? Provide a description of how the FTI is encrypted. Section 9.3.16.9 9.3.16.15
SI No: 026/12-13 Serious Incident ACTION LOG Incident summary Death caused by person in receipt of community treatment Immediate actions Action Required Date To be completed by Lead & of Responsibility How are Actions to be audited? Evidence (of completion) Current Status as at (date) Recommendation 1. Commissioners should consider developing pathways of care that identify young people at risk of mental health problems in custody, and co-ordinates their care across primary and secondary mental healthcare, and youth justice teams. The PCLD service is an ageless service who assess YP placed detained in custody where the police identify a possible MH concern. There is also a CAMHS specific part time PCLDS worker in East who is also linked in with the East Sussex YOS. Completed Jaquie Batchelor Monitored through regular police and SPT meetings Meeting minutes Completed Recommendation 2. The Trust should ensure that serious incident investigations are of the requisite quality standard and are sufficiently rigorous and robust to enable proper organisational learning. All level 2 serious incidents are now subject to a panel review of Complete Managing Directors Complete
senior clinicians. Serious Incident report template has been updated to ensure all key areas are identified and reviewed All serious incidents are subject to ‘sign off’ by Clinical Director, Service Director and Director of Nursing standards & safety All level 3 reports and action plans are shared and reviewed by the trust suicide and Completed Completed Director of Nursing Standards & Safety 3.Director of Nursing Standards & Safety 4.Dr Tim Ojo – Medical Director Annual serious audit SI (See above) Minutes of Homicide & suicide review group Complete Completed Completed
homicide review group. Recommendation 3. The should ensure that staff undertaking serious incident investigations are suitably trained, prepared and supported. Only staff trained in RCA Completed Director of Nursing Standards & safety Annual review The RCA presentation was sent separately due to the size of the file. Complete Recommendation 4. The Trust should ensure that the clinical risk assessment and management and active engagement policies are consistently implemented. This is now a requirement for all staff and is set as a standard in appraisal and monitored through supervision session. On going Local Service managers Staff induction Core training Regular audits Supervision notes and appraisal Complete Recommendation 5. The final outcome of contact with secondary mental health services should always be communicated to the service users’ GP. The CCG and Trust should agree the routes of communication between secondary mental health services and GPs, and embed these into practice. Performance requirements with CCGs and commissioners are now embedded within the community services. Requirement of 5 day response to GPs. On going Local Service managers Performance reports Performance reports Complete
July 2016 Americas Bosch Security Systems, Inc. 130 Perinton Parkway Fairport, New York, 14450, USA + 1 800 289 0096 Fax: +1 585 223 9180 security.sales@us.bosch.com Europe, Middle East, Africa Bosch Security Systems B.V. P.O. Box 80002 5617 BA Eindhoven, The Netherlands Phone: + 31 40 2577 284 Fax: +31 40 2577 330 www.boschsecurity.com Asia-Pacific Robert Bosch (SEA) Pte Ltd, Security Systems 11 Bishan Street 21 Singapore 573943 Phone: +65 6571 2808 Fax: +65 6571 2699 www.boschsecurity.asia Product Guide Specification SECTION 28 23 29 VIDEO SURVEILLANCE REMOTE DEVICES AND SENSORS BOSCH IIR-50850-MR INFRARED ILLUMINATOR – GENERAL SUMMARY Section Includes Video Surveillance Remote Devices and Sensors. Related Sections Section [26 55 53 – Special Purpose Lighting – Security Lighting]. Section [28 23 13 – Video Surveillance Control and Management Systems]. Section [28 23 16 – Video Surveillance Monitoring and Supervisory Interfaces]. Section [28 23 23 – Video Surveillance Systems Infrastructure]. **********Specifier’s note: Include those standards referenced elsewhere in this SECTION.
July 2016 Americas Bosch Security Systems, Inc. 130 Perinton Parkway Fairport, New York, 14450, USA Phone: + 1 800 289 0096 Fax: +1 585 223 9180 security.sales@us.bosch.com Europe, Middle East, Africa Security Systems B.V. P.O. Box 80002 5617 BA Eindhoven, The Netherlands Phone: + 31 40 2577 284 Fax: +31 40 2577 330 www.boschsecurity.com Asia-Pacific Robert Bosch (SEA) Pte Ltd, Security Systems 11 Bishan Street 21 Singapore 573943 Phone: +65 6571 2808 Fax: +65 6571 2699 apr.securitysystems@bosch.com www.boschsecurity.asia Product Guide Specification SECTION 28 23 29 VIDEO SURVEILLANCE REMOTE DEVICES AND SENSORS BOSCH IIR-50850-XR INFRARED ILLUMINATOR – GENERAL SUMMARY Section Includes Video Surveillance Remote Devices and Sensors. Related Sections Section [26 55 53 – Special Purpose Lighting – Security Lighting]. Section [28 23 13 – Video Surveillance Control and Management Systems]. Section [28 23 16 – Video Surveillance Monitoring and Supervisory Interfaces]. Section [28 23 23 – Video Surveillance Systems Infrastructure]. **********Specifier’s note: Include those standards referenced elsewhere in this SECTION.
July 2016 Americas Bosch Security Systems, Inc. 130 Perinton Parkway Fairport, New York, USA Phone: + 1 800 289 0096 Fax: +1 585 223 9180 security.sales@us.bosch.com Europe, Middle East, Africa Bosch Security Systems B.V. P.O. Box 80002 5617 BA Eindhoven, The Netherlands Phone: + 31 40 2577 284 Fax: +31 40 2577 330 www.boschsecurity.com Asia-Pacific Robert Bosch (SEA) Pte Ltd, Security Systems 11 Bishan Street 21 Singapore 573943 +65 6571 2808 Fax: +65 6571 2699 apr.securitysystems@bosch.com www.boschsecurity.asia Product Guide Specification SECTION 28 23 29 VIDEO SURVEILLANCE REMOTE DEVICES AND SENSORS IIR-50940-LR INFRARED ILLUMINATOR – GENERAL SUMMARY Section Includes Video Surveillance Remote Devices and Sensors. Related Sections Section [26 55 53 – Special Purpose Lighting – Security Lighting]. Section [28 23 13 – Video Surveillance Control and Management Systems]. Section [28 23 16 – Video Surveillance Monitoring and Supervisory Interfaces]. Section [28 23 23 – Surveillance Systems Infrastructure]. **********Specifier’s note: Include standards referenced elsewhere in this SECTION.
Mechanical Housing Robust anodized aluminum extrusion, black Front window Polycarbonate high transmittance (vandal-resistant) with self-cleaning technology Mount Black powder coated stainless steel U-bracket (adjustable with M6 socket-head wrench) Cable 3 m (9 ft) Dimensions (W x H x D) 110 x 162 x 76 mm (4.33 x 6.38 x 2.99 in) Weight 1.35 kg (3 lbs) Environmental Operation Temperature Range -50 °C to +50 °C (-58 °F to +122 °F) Protection IP66 ACCESSORIES Mounting brackets IIR-MNT-SLB Single L-bracket bracket for one IR Illuminator. IIR-MNT-DLB Double L-bracket bracket for two IR Illuminators. IIR-MNT-TLB Triple L-bracket mount bracket for three IR Illuminators. IIR-MNT-PMB Pole mount bracket for IR Illuminator. – EXECUTION EXAMINATION Examine to receive devices and notify adverse conditions affecting installation or subsequent operation. Do not begin installation until unacceptable conditions are corrected. PREPARATION Protect devices from damage during construction.
July 2016 Americas Bosch Security Systems, Inc. 130 Perinton Parkway Fairport, New York, 14450, USA Phone: + 1 800 289 0096 Fax: +1 585 223 9180 security.sales@us.bosch.com Europe, Middle East, Africa Security Systems B.V. P.O. Box 80002 5617 BA Eindhoven, The Netherlands Phone: + 31 40 2577 284 Fax: +31 40 2577 330 www.boschsecurity.com Asia-Pacific Robert Bosch (SEA) Pte Ltd, Security Systems 11 Bishan Street 21 Singapore 573943 Phone: +65 6571 2808 Fax: +65 6571 2699 apr.securitysystems@bosch.com www.boschsecurity.asia Product Guide Specification SECTION 28 23 29 VIDEO SURVEILLANCE REMOTE DEVICES AND SENSORS BOSCH IIR-50940-SR INFRARED ILLUMINATOR – GENERAL SUMMARY Section Includes Video Surveillance Remote Devices and Sensors. Related Sections Section [26 55 53 – Special Purpose Lighting – Security Lighting]. Section [28 23 13 – Video Surveillance Control and Management Systems]. Section [28 23 16 – Video Surveillance Monitoring and Supervisory Interfaces]. Section [28 23 23 – Video Surveillance Systems Infrastructure]. **********Specifier’s note: Include standards referenced elsewhere in this SECTION.
July 2016 Americas Bosch Security Systems, Inc. 130 Perinton Parkway Fairport, New York, 14450, USA Phone: + 1 800 289 0096 Fax: +1 585 223 9180 security.sales@us.bosch.com Europe, Middle East, Africa Bosch Security Systems B.V. P.O. Box 80002 5617 BA Eindhoven, The Netherlands Phone: + 31 40 2577 284 Fax: +31 40 2577 330 www.boschsecurity.com Asia-Pacific Robert Bosch (SEA) Pte Ltd, Security Systems 11 Bishan Street 21 Singapore 573943 Phone: +65 6571 2808 Fax: +65 6571 2699 apr.securitysystems@bosch.com www.boschsecurity.asia Product Guide Specification SECTION 28 23 29 VIDEO SURVEILLANCE REMOTE DEVICES AND SENSORS BOSCH IIR-50940-XR INFRARED ILLUMINATOR – GENERAL SUMMARY Section Includes Video Surveillance Remote Devices and Sensors. Related Sections Section [26 55 53 – Special Purpose Lighting – Security Lighting]. Section [28 23 13 – Video Surveillance Control and Management Systems]. Section [28 23 16 – Video Surveillance Monitoring and Supervisory Interfaces]. Section [28 23 23 – Video Surveillance Systems Infrastructure]. **********Specifier’s note: Include standards referenced elsewhere in this SECTION.
PRESIDENT’S NATIONAL SECURITY TELECOMMUNICATIONS ADVISORY COMMITTEE INDUSTRIAL INTERNET SCOPING REPORT Final Draft I. Overview and Background: Global communications networks that intersect with physical infrastructure underpin almost every facet of American society. This includes systems that provide critical support to public infrastructure, social interaction, and the country’s national and economic security. Unfortunately, this increasing interdependency of the physical and cyber domains is accompanied by a corresponding growth in threats and vulnerabilities, creating a challenge in balancing the benefits and the risks of this evolving interconnection. Industry and the Federal Government have initiated several programs designed to enhance the security of the Internet as it supports national security and emergency preparedness (NS/EP) functions; however, technological innovation continues to advance ahead of security solutions to protect applications and interconnections. An example of this is the rapid proliferation of interconnected physical devices and their inclusion into systems supporting critical infrastructure is the Industrial Internet, more commonly referred to as the Internet of Things (IoT). In addition to the phrase Industrial Internet, the IoT is referred to by several terms, including (M2M) communications, Internet of everything, and cyber physical systems (CPS). Broadly speaking, the IoT is an expansion of
Step 1: Windows IIS Installation In Windows 7, go to “Control Panels” “Programs and Features” “Turn Windows features on or off” Make sure “Internet Information Services” is selected and that “CGI” is also selected under “World Wide Web Services” “Application Development Features” “CGI” “OK” button at the bottom right. Step 2: Python Configuration Download and install the version of Python (32-bit or 64-bit) you need from . Recommended: Install Python 2.7.x instead of Python 3.x many older libraries are not yet supported by Python 3.x. Open a command window, and install the wfastcgi tool using the command “pip install wfastcgi”. wfastcgi provides a bridge between IIS and Python using WSGI and FastCGI.
Rule 14 (3) when a defendant delivers a notice of intention to defend he or she must in that notice – (a) … (b) appoint an address within a flexible radius from the office of the registrar, not being a post office box or poste restante, for service on him or her of all documents in that action. [4] A Windhoek address for the purposes of proceedings in Oshakati, a distance of 700± kilometres is not in accordance with the rules. [5] Defendant, therefore, has two short comings, firstly, neither herself nor her legal practitioner and even the correspondent’s legal practitioner appeared in court as required by the rules and no explanation as to what the current position is, was given. Secondly, they failed to provide an address for service in terms of the rules. [6] This court, has, for time without number advised and warned legal practitioners that they should carry out their mandates professionally and diligently. That expectation is, indeed lacking in the instructing legal practitioner. [7] The civil proceedings in this jurisdiction are now firmly administered under the case management system which effectively took away the important powers from litigants and their legal practitioners and hence made them court-driven. It is for that reason that these courts view any transgression by litigants and/or their legal practitioners with a jaundice eye. In order to rein in errant legal practitioners a sanctions provision was inserted in the new rules for that purpose. These courts will therefore not be found wanting where such situation demands. [8] Any litigant who to comply with these rules and in the absence of any reasonable explanation as to the said failure stands the risk of censure. This case is deserving of one. While it will be fitting to censure defendant, the court has to give a serious consideration of the sanction bearing in mind the circumstances surrounding the case and that each case is to be determined on its own merits. [9] This is a matrimonial matter. It is trite that these courts are loathe to punish litigants in matrimonial matters as they are highly emotional and at the same time involve litigants’ change of status. I am alive to the fact that defendant has always
suitability across banana varieties 2.3.2 Compare the reliability of young plant resistance testing compared to whole plant testing in field for evaluations against Fusarium wilt, Sigatoka, nematodes and weevils Establish cultivation of plantlets of selected banana varieties Manage cultivation of plants of selected banana varieties Challenge whole plants of selected banana varieties with representative populations of target pests and pathogens from surveys 8 differential cultivars selected for virulence testing are under tissue culture multiplication 80% variance Reason for variance: Delay in getting tissue culture plants. 2.4 Train staff in banana disease evaluation, resistance screening and pathogen and pest identification with focus on Fusarium wilt, Sigatoka, nematodes and weevils 2.4.1 Train staff on survey and culturing of Fusarium wilt, Sigatoka, nematodes and weevils Stellenbosch univ (Fusarium), Sigatoka (IITA), weevil (NARO), nematodes (ARI-Tengeru). Some institutions are lacking trained personnel to carryout survey for mapping the occurrence, distribution and abundance of identified key pests and pathogens manuals developed to support the recognition of target pests and diseases and protocols for sample collection On station training provided in both Tanzania and Uganda during visits A manual has been developed for identification of Sigatoka and pest and diseases. This is being prepared for publication. 0% variance trial
Conference for Food Protection 2018 Issue Form Issue: 2018 II-014 Council Recommendation: Accepted as Submitted Accepted as Amended No Action Delegate Action: Accepted Rejected All information above the line is for conference use only. Issue History: This is a brand new Issue. Title: PSC 2 - Improvements to VNRFRPS Issue you would like the Conference to consider: The Program Standards Committee has completed the charges 1 and 3 outlined in the recommendation for Issue 2016 II-009, and the Committee is requesting the proposed recommendations be sent to the FDA as improvements to the Voluntary National Retail Food Regulatory Program Standards (VNRFRPS.) Public Health Significance: The Voluntary National Retail Food Regulatory Program Standards (VNRFRPS) offers a systematic approach, through a continuous improvement process, to enhance retail food regulatory programs. To address charges 1 and 3 from Issue 2016 II-009, the subcommittee reviewed each Standard of the VNRFRPS to identify areas in which they could be modified or improved to increase enrollment, implementation and support regulatory efforts as they relate to the VNRFRPS. Recommended Solution: The Conference recommends...: that a letter be sent to the FDA requesting that the Voluntary National Retail Food Regulatory Program Standards (VNRFRPS) be amended by addressing the following: 1) Standard 1: Recognize that enrolled regulatory agencies, especially local regulators, may not have control over their retail food regulations. Recognize efforts made to achieve
Trainee Last name(s) First name(s) Date of birth Nationality Sex [M/F] Study cycle of education Sending Institution Name Faculty/ Department Erasmus code (if applicable) Address Country Contact person name; email; phone Receiving Name Department Address; website Country Size Contact person name; position; e-mail; phone Mentor name; position; e-mail; phone < 250 employees > 250 employees Before the mobility Table A - Traineeship Programme at the Receiving Organisation/Enterprise Planned period of the mobility: from [month/year] ……………. to [month/year] ……………. Traineeship title: … Number of working hours per week: … Detailed programme of the traineeship: Knowledge, skills and competences to be acquired by the end of the traineeship (expected Learning Outcomes): Monitoring plan: Evaluation plan: The level of language competence in ________ [indicate here the main language of work] that the trainee already has or agrees to acquire by the start of the mobility period is: A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 C2 Native speaker Table B - Sending Institution Please use only one of the following three boxes: traineeship is embedded in the curriculum and upon satisfactory completion of the traineeship, the institution undertakes to: traineeship is voluntary and, upon satisfactory completion of the traineeship, the institution undertakes to: traineeship is carried out by a recent graduate and, upon satisfactory completion of the traineeship, the institution undertakes to: Accident insurance for the trainee Table C - Receiving Organisation/Enterprise Organisation
3.2 CO-APPLICANT INFORMATION: Please list details regarding co-applicants for the proposed project Name: Title: Department: Institution/agency: E-mail: Office phone: Cell phone: Street address: City, Province: Postal code: Signature Date Name: Title: Department: Institution/agency: E-mail: Office phone: Cell phone: Street address: City, Province: Postal code: Signature Date Name: Title: Department: Institution/agency: E-mail: Office phone: Cell phone: Street address: City, Province: Postal code: Signature Date Name: Title: Department: Institution/agency: E-mail: Office phone: Cell phone: Street address: City, Province: Postal code:
Process evaluation verifies what the components of an intervention are and whether they’re implemented as intended. Process evaluation involves “…finding out if the program has all its parts, and if the parts are functioning as they are supposed to be functioning” (Patton, 1997). When conducting process evaluation, we ask questions like: What did we do? How much did we do? Did we do it as we had planned? How well did we do it? For additional resources and examples to help you plan for process evaluation, please see: Process evaluation plan (template) Evaluation question What do we want to know about how we implemented the initiative? Activities …involved in implementing the initiative Indicator(s) Things you can measure to know you’ve implemented activities as intended Data collection method(s) What method will be used to measure the indicator? e.g., survey, group, interview, document review, etc. Data collection tool(s) What specific tool will be used? Respondent(s) Who will provide the information needed? e.g., parent, child, clinician, teacher, program staff, etc. Person(s) responsible for data collection Who is responsible for ensuring the data are collected? Timing of data collection When will the data be collected? Outcome evaluation focuses on assessing the impact of an intervention - examining the extent to which you’ve achieved your outcome objectives. When conducting outcome evaluation, we ask questions like: What difference did this make? So what? Who is better off? How much so and in what ways?
For additional resources and examples to help you plan for process evaluation, please see: Outcome evaluation plan (template) Evaluation question What do we want to know about the impact of the initiative? Link to anticipated outcomes Who and/or what is better off because of the initiative? Indicator(s) Measurable approximation of the outcome Data collection method(s) What method will be used to measure the indicator? e.g., survey, focus group, interview, document review, etc. Data collection tool(s) What specific tool will be used? Respondent(s) Who will provide the information needed? e.g., parent, child, clinician, teacher, program staff, etc. Person(s) responsible for data collection Who is responsible for ensuring the data are collected? Timing of data collection When will the data be collected?
Deputy Secretaries; VA Under Secretaries; VA Asst. Secretaries; other high profile individuals; special cases, e.g. witness protection jurisdiction over records with a level of sensitivity equal to 9 8 VA Senior Executive Service; Directors and Assistant Directors; Regional Counsel; Div. Chiefs or equivalent; persons of national prominence; Governors; Lt. Governors; Attorneys General of states or commonwealths; locally prominent persons or officials 3 years after leaving public or government service Facility Directors and assistants; Area Directors; Veteran Service Center (VSC) Managers and Assistants; all other Division Chiefs 7 Veterans Benefit Administration (VBA) employees; private attorney fee cases 3 years after leaving public or government service. The exception is private attorney fee cases. These cases remain level 7 until the Attorney Fee designation for a particular claim no longer exists. Information Security Officer (ISO) and AISO, System Security Officers, Supervisory Accredited VSO reps; Private Attorneys; all VA Supervisors with a business need; and 10% of a VBA entities’ staff with a business need. supervisory
Appendix V, must be on file with the employee’s supervisor before any information may be taken off-site. The employee must complete and submit the VR&E Sign-Out Log, Appendix AD, to the employee’s supervisor each time information is taken off-site and returned. Handling Veterans’ Personal Information Including Mock-up Folders Provided to VR&E Contractors (Change Date October 23, 2012) All case managers must follow the procedures outlined below regarding the creation, retention, handling, and destroying of documents and folders provided to contractors: CER folders will not be released to contractors. Only copies of data and documents necessary for the contractor to conduct the services requested will be placed in the mock-up folders and forwarded to contractors. Types of documents provided to the contractor will vary from case to case depending on the type of services requested and background information required to provide the services. To ensure that the contractor does not misuse PII, any document containing personally identifying information may be released as long as safeguards are in place to protect the information and it is outlined in the contract. Refer to VA Handbook 6500.6. Case managers must follow the guidance relating to the protection of privacy and release of information as cited in M28R.III.C.2. Documents containing personal identifying information must be sent according to VBA’s prescribed shipping method. Contractors must follow the procedures outlined regarding Veterans’ files and documents: All documents returned by contractors to the VR&E office must be sent via mail delivery service with traceable means. As cited in the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), Subpart 4.7, Contractor Records Retention, all contractors are responsible for retaining records, materials, and other evidence relating to cases and services provided to Veterans under VR&E contracts until three years after final payment has been rendered. Contractors are required to follow the guidance relating to the privacy up
own family members. It does not matter if they are from the same reserve, or race, or anything of the sort, as long as they have connected and a sincere relationship has formed. Many aboriginal people will consider someone family, even if they are not biologically related. Some of the stories within this anthology speak about those types of relationships that can form into family. I thought this book really captured my mind and had my imagination running with pictures and scenes coming from the words that I was reading. I can imagine that it would do the same for many young students. I would highly recommend this book to use as a classroom resource. References King, Thomas. (1990). All my relations. Toronto, ON: McClelland & Stewart Ltd. Shawna Spence 001645 Assignment: Book Review #8, Trickster 02:381 Teaching of Aboriginal Studies