Urban Infrastructure and Service Delivery 23 23 E. Bank Positions At ICR At Approval Vice President: Jorge Familiar Calderon Pamela Cox Country Director: Anabela Abreu Alexandre Abrantes Practice Manager: Ming Zhang Guang Zhe Chen Task Team Leader: Jonas Ingemann Parby Sylvie Debomy Co-Task Team Leader: Ali Alwahti ICR Team Leader: Roland Alexander Bradshaw ICR Primary Author: Fadi M. Doumani F. Results Framework Analysis Project Development Objectives (from Project Appraisal Document) To help residents of selected Port-au-Prince Neighborhoods severely affected by the Earthquake return to their communities by supporting them to repair and/or reconstruct their houses and improving basic community service infrastructure. Revised Project Development Objectives (as approved by original approving authority) To help residents of selected Port-au-Prince Neighborhoods severely affected by the Earthquake return to their communities by supporting them to repair and/or reconstruct their houses and/or return to improved housing conditions and improving basic community service infrastructure. (a) PDO Indicator(s) Indicator Baseline Value Original Target Values (from approval documents) Formally Revised Target Values 1st Restructuring Formally Revised Target Values 2nd Restructuring Actual Achieved at Completion or Target Years Indicator 1: Number of displaced households who have returned to neighborhoods upon completion of housing repair and reconstruction works and/or receiving return support Value quantitative or Qualitative) 0 12,000 16,000 16,000 16,099 Date achieved 31-Jul-2011 30-Jun-2015 11-Oct-2012 12-Feb-2015 31-Dec-2016 Comments (incl. % achievement) Exceeded target by 1% The result of this indicator is the sum of intermediate indicators 1, 2 and 8 (see Indicator 2: Number of households benefitting from community-wide upgrading Value quantitative or Qualitative) 0 42,000 42,000 42,000 75,035 Date achieved 31-Jul-2011 30-Jun-2015 11-Oct-2012 12-Feb-2015 31-Dec-2016 Comments (incl. % achievement) Exceeded target by 79%
Indicator 3: Direct project beneficiaries Value quantitative or Qualitative) 0 210,000 210,000 210,000 348,163 Date achieved 31-Jul-2011 30-Jun-2015 11-Oct-2012 12-Feb-2015 31-Dec-2016 Comments (incl. % achievement) Core Supplemental Indicator. Exceeded target by 66% Indicator 4: Direct project Female beneficiaries Value quantitative or Qualitative) 0 105,000 105,000 105,000 182,089 Date achieved 31-Jul-2011 30-Jun-2015 11-Oct-2012 12-Feb-2015 31-Dec-2016 Comments (incl. % achievement) Core Supplemental Indicator. Exceeded target by 73% Note: Indicator targets were not changed during the 3rd Restructuring. (b) Intermediate Outcome Indicator(s) Indicator Baseline Original Target Values (approval documents) Formally Revised Target Values 1st Restructuring Formally Revised Target Values 2nd Restructuring Actual Value Achieved at Completion or Target Years Indicator 1: Percentage volume (m3) of debris cleared in neighborhoods Value (quantitative/ qualitative) 0 TBD TBD 1,154 2,405 Date achieved 31-Jul-2011 30-Jun-2015 11-Oct-2012 12-Feb-2015 31-Dec-2016 Comments (incl. % achievement) Target exceeded by 108% Target to be determined as a % of contracted agreement of volume removed from total volume. However, only the volume removed by contractors is reported. Indicator 2: Number of housing units repaired compliant with standards Value (quantitative/ qualitative) 0 8,300 3,000 1,162 1,134 Date achieved 31-Jul-2011 30-Jun-2015 11-Oct-2012 12-Feb-2015 31-Dec-2016 Comments (incl. % achievement) Achieved 98% of target. Indicator 3: Number of houses rebuilt compliant with standards Value (quantitative/ qualitative) 0 3,700 1,000 938 944 Date achieved 31-Jul-2011 30-Jun-2015 11-Oct-2012 12-Feb-2015 31-Dec-2016 Comments (incl. % Exceeded target.
achievement) Indicator 4: CRCs are established, fully staffed and effective Value (quantitative/ qualitative) 0 4 4 4 4 Date achieved 31-Jul-2011 30-Jun-2015 11-Oct-2012 12-Feb-2015 31-Dec-2016 Comments (incl. % achievement) Achieved target. Indicator 5: Number of community infrastructure repair and rehabilitation contracts completed Value (quantitative/ qualitative) 0 TBD TBD 277 288 Date achieved 31-Jul-2011 30-Jun-2015 11-Oct-2012 12-Feb-2015 31-Dec-2016 Comments (incl. % achievement) Exceeded target by 4% Indicator 6: Community urban development plan completed and approved by the Communities Value (quantitative or Qualitative) 0 TBD TBD 4 4 Date achieved 31-Jul-2011 30-Jun-2015 11-Oct-2012 12-Feb-2015 31-Dec-2016 Comments (incl. % achievement) Target achieved. Indicator 7: Baseline established no later than 6 months after project launch and M&E reports available annually Value (quantitative/ qualitative) 0 1 1 1 1 Date achieved 31-Jul-2011 30-Jun-2015 11-Oct-2012 12-Feb-2015 31-Dec-2016 Comments (incl. % achievement) Target achieved. Indicator 8: Number of households provided Return Cash Grants Value (quantitative/ qualitative) Not Applicable Not Applicable 12,000 13,900 14,021 Date achieved 31-Jul-2011 30-Jun-2015 11-Oct-2012 12-Feb-2015 31-Dec-2016 Comments (incl. % achievement) Target exceeded. Note: Indicator targets were not changed during 3rd Restructuring. G. Ratings of Project Performance in ISRs
Annex 2. Outputs by Component Component Achievements Output Unit Original Target Restructuring Target Actual Component 1: Debris Removal and Housing Repair and Reconstruction Debris Removal Building debris was removed by specialized enterprises from public spaces (and subject to the consent of the owner, private lots). Constructions marked as unsafe and beyond repair (i.e., red-tagged houses by MTPCT) or considered unfit for repair were safely demolished. m3 TBD 1,154 2,405 Housing Repair and Retrofitting Support was provided to residents of the selected Port-au-Prince neighborhoods to carry out repairs and/or retrofit yellow-tagged houses and buildings under the owners’ own initiative (hiring contractors, labor, etc.,) in compliance with standards (many standards existed) and endorsed by MTPTC and the municipality. The target was scaled down during the restructurings due to a missing baseline. The amounts allocated (US$1,350 for repairs and US$3,500 for retrofitting that could also serve as a down payment to get a bank loan), the area determined by UN-Habitat design (18 m2) and the standards to be used remained contentious during project implementation, although efforts were made to increase the area to 22 m2 and allow for a modular construction in the housing that allowed for expansion by the owner in the future and included the structural reinforcement of houses to enable them to withstand the effects of possible future earthquakes with likely different seismic parameters. All technical assessments and grant agreements were prepared by CRCs and agreements were signed between BMPAD and the owners, while CRCs were responsible for work supervision; the grant was paid in four equal tranches. Housing repair and retrofitting reached 98% of the target. # 8,300 1,162 1,134 Housing Construction Cash Grants were provided to Beneficiaries for the on-site reconstruction of houses and buildings, and houses unfit for repair. The amounts allocated (US$3,600), the house sizes (18m2, 25 m2, 36 m2 and 46 m2 depending on whether it was a single family or a multi-family house) and the standards to be # 3,700 938 944 tagged