F. Results Framework Analysis vii G. Ratings of Project Performance in ISRs x H. Restructuring x I. Disbursement Graph Annex xi 1. Project Context, Development Objectives and Design 1 2. Key Factors Affecting Implementation and Outcomes 5 3. Assessment of Outcomes 11 4. Assessment of Risk to Development Outcome 19 5. Assessment of Bank and Borrower Performance 20 6. Lessons Learned 23 7. Comments on Issues Raised by Borrower/Implementing Agencies/Partners 24 Annex 1. Project Costs and Financing 25 Annex 2. Outputs by Component 26 Annex 3. Economic and Financial Analysis 29 Annex 4. Bank Lending and Implementation Support/Supervision Processes 33 Annex 5. Beneficiary Survey Results 35 Annex 6. Stakeholder Workshop Report and 36 Annex 7. Summary of Borrower's ICR and/or Comments on Draft ICR 37 Annex 8. List of Supporting Documents 47 MAP 48 Country: Nepal Project Name: Urban Governance and Development Program: Emerging Towns Project Project ID: P120265 L/C/TF Number(s): IDA-49050, ICR Date: 03/16/2017 ICR Type: Core ICR Lending Instrument: SIL Borrower: GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL Original Total Commitment: USD 25.00M Disbursed Amount: USD 11.66M Revised Amount: USD 12.9M Environmental Category: B Implementing Agencies: Department of Urban Development and Building Construction (DUDBC)
Cofinanciers and Other External Partners: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit GmbH (GIZ) B. Key Dates Process Date Process Original Date Revised / Actual Date(s) Concept Review: 04/07/2010 Effectiveness: 10/02/2011 Appraisal: 02/14/2011 Restructuring(s): 01/21/2013 07/19/2013 07/18/2016 Approval: 05/10/2011 Mid-term Review: 03/03/2014 03/19/2014 Closing: 07/31/2016 01/31/2017 C. Ratings Summary C.1 Performance Rating by ICR Outcomes: Moderately Satisfactory Risk to Development Outcome: Substantial Bank Performance: Moderately Satisfactory Borrower Performance: Moderately Satisfactory C.2 Detailed Ratings of Bank and Borrower Performance (by ICR) Bank Ratings Borrower Ratings Quality at Entry: Moderately Unsatisfactory Government: Moderately Unsatisfactory Quality of Supervision: Moderately Satisfactory Implementing Agency/Agencies: Moderately Satisfactory Overall Bank Performance: Moderately Satisfactory Overall Borrower Performance: Moderately Satisfactory C.3 Quality at Entry and Implementation Performance Indicators Implementation Performance Indicators QAG Assessments (if any) Rating Potential Problem Project at any time (Yes/No): Yes Quality at Entry (QEA): None Problem Project at any time (Yes/No): Yes Quality of Supervision (QSA): None DO rating before Closing/Inactive status: Moderately Satisfactory
G. Ratings of Project Performance in ISRs No. Date ISR Archived DO IP Actual Disbursements (USD millions) 1 12/21/2011 Moderately Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory 0.06 2 06/12/2012 Moderately Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory 0.06 3 12/14/2012 Moderately Unsatisfactory Moderately Unsatisfactory 5.06 4 03/13/2013 Moderately Unsatisfactory Moderately Unsatisfactory 5.06 5 09/18/2013 Moderately Unsatisfactory Moderately Unsatisfactory 5.06 6 10/30/2013 Moderately Unsatisfactory Moderately Unsatisfactory 5.06 7 01/19/2014 Moderately Unsatisfactory Moderately Unsatisfactory 7.15 8 05/10/2014 Moderately Unsatisfactory Moderately Unsatisfactory 7.68
strengthened institutions at the national level (including MoUD, MoFALD, and TDF) as well as the participating municipalities. This approach enabled scaling up or evolving to wider replication of programs built on strengthened policies and institutions at both national and local levels. 7. Comments on Issues Raised by Borrower/Implementing Agencies/Partners (a) Borrower/implementing agencies Annex 7 provides a summary of the borrower’s ICR. The report is well prepared and draws on strong evidence-based facts based on independent reviews at the ICR stage. There were several issues were identified by the borrower during interactions with implementing agencies, municipalities, and stakeholders, which are very useful in informing project design of other similar projects in the future. (b) Cofinanciers Not Applicable. (c) Other partners and stakeholders Not Applicable. Annex 1. Project Costs and Financing Components Appraisal Estimate (US$ m) (IDA) Revised Estimate at Restructuring (US$ m) (IDA) Actual (US$ m) (IDA) Percentage at Appraisal (% of IDA) Percentage of Revised (% of IDA) Component 1: Block Grants 5.00 4.43 4.73 20 41 Component 2: Municipal sub-projects 16.37 5.10 4.59 65 39 Component 3: Institutional Development 3.63 3.38 2.34 15 20 Total Baseline Cost 25.00 12.90 11.66 Physical Contingencies Price Contingencies 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Project Costs 0.00 0.00 0.00 Front-end fee PPF Front-end fee IBRD Total Financing Required 25.00 12.90 11.66 (b) Financing Source of Funds Type of Cofinancing Appraisal Estimate (USD millions) Actual/Latest Estimate (USD millions) Percentage of Appraisal Borrower 5.00 0.00 0 Local Communities/Municipalities 2.13 1.78 83.57 GERMANY: GTZ 3.00 2.66 88.67