Component 1: Effective national framework for managing wildlife trade Outcome 1: Strengthened national policy, legal and institutional framework for regulating illegal commercial wildlife trade and combating illegal wildlife trade 1.1: The following key legislation gaps are addressed by improved IWT legislation documents approved by Government: -Minimum fines and sentences increased to provide deterrent effect; -Non-native endangered species including elephant, rhinoceros, big cat and pangolin species given legal protection -Indonesian protected species list updated to include all CITES Appendix 1 and globally threatened species - Authority of forestry civil investigators improved - Detention/prison evaluation for creating deterrent effect and rehabilitation for criminals. - online trade regulation to address online wildlife trafficking. 0 -Minimum fines increase by 25% Average sentences increase by 10% on baseline. Indonesian protected species list updated to include all CITES Appendix 1 and globally threatened species, including non-native species All key gaps incorporated in the issued legislation and be implemented. There is sufficient political will to support revision of key policies, laws and regulations There are no major bureaucratic delays in seeing revisions through to approval stage 1.2: Inter-agency taskforce in place and operational as indicated/measured by the signing of an inter-agency agreements targeting IWT 0 Inter-agency taskforce in place and operational; 1 inter agency collaboration agreement Inter-agency taskforce operational; 1 formal inter agency collaboration agreements National organizations are willing to collaborate on IWT
Parallel co-financing: The planned parallel co-financing will be used as follows: Co-financing source type Co-financing amount Planned Activities/Outputs Risks Risk Mitigation Measures Government (MoEF) Grant 42,848,742 Office space for PMU, staff inputs to implementation of all project components, use of government equipment, vehicles, facilities, etc. Routine law enforcement patrols, routine operations to protect forest area, infrastructures procurement and maintenance related to law enforcement activities, training for forest rangers, equipment for monitoring and patrolling, coordination and collaborations on forest protection and surveillance, and preventive activities related to forest protection and surveillance. Unforeseen budget cuts to relevant agencies GEF budget allocated for specific activities and outputs sufficient to achieve results CSO (WCS) Grant 2,000,000 Various outputs in Components 1, 2 and 3 Changes in relations with government WCS has agreements with MoEF covering project related interventions UNDP Grant 100,000 Strengthen coordination among law enforcement agencies, promoting knowledge exchange, and leveraging possible resources to sustain project results. Change in Government structure may affect programming priority and participation of relevant key Government partner in the UNDP and the project team will provide equal information and written progress report to the beneficiaries both policy maker and
Annex 2 Monitoring Plan The Project Manager/Coordinator will collect results data according to the following monitoring plan. Monitoring Indicators Data source/Collection Methods Frequency Responsible for data collection Means of verification Assumptions and Risks Project objective: To reduce the volume of unsustainable wildlife trade and the rate of loss of globally significant biodiversity in Indonesia and East and South-East Asia 0.1: Extent to which legal or policy or institutional frameworks are in place for conservation, sustainable use, and access and benefit sharing of natural resources, biodiversity and ecosystems. (IRRF Output 2.5 indicator 2.5.1) Consultations with government institutions and partners to review policy and legal frameworks status Annually Project Manager/ M&E Officer Coordinator IP Official government notifications and announcements for new legislation Monitoring progress reports Assumptions: There is sufficient political will to support revision of key policies, laws and regulations There are no major bureaucratic delays in seeing revisions through to approval stage Risks: Political change 0.2: Number of direct project beneficiaries: - Number of government agency staff including enforcement officers who improved their knowledge and skills on IWT due to the project (m/f) - Number of local people in project demonstration areas benefiting from engagement in conservation activities, reduced HWC impacts and improved livelihoods (m/f) Review of project reports; questionnaire surveys for target communities in demo areas MTR and TE Project Manager/ M&E officer Coordinator IP Reports from consultation processes Survey Results Monitoring progress reports Assumptions: Continuing level of political will to support the project intervention Good relationship continues between enforcement agencies and key CSO partners Risks: Communities do not accept project intervention in their areas
Project Outcome 2 Strengthened institutional capacity for regulatory coordination, implementation and enforcement at the national and international levels 2.1: Strengthened institutional capacity to combat IWT as indicated by i) the ICCWC Indicator Framework (note – baselines to be determined in year 1), ii) UNDP Capacity Development Scorecard for Gakkum (see Annex 18), and iii) iii) Operational status of Gakkum’s Information System i) ICCWC Indicator Framework assessments ii) UNDP CD Scorecard assessments iii) Operational database within Gakkum At project inception; MTR and TE Project Manager/ M&E officer Coordinator IP ICCWC Indicator Framework assessment reports; UNDP CD Scorecard assessment reports; Information System is fully operational and operated by trained staff Assumptions: Assessments are carried out consistently between years and agencies Strengthened inter-agency collaboration is reflected in the increased scores Political support continues for DG Law Enforcement’s role in managing the information system on WT Risks: Difficulty to find trained staff to conduct ICCWC IF assessments Lack of collaboration from key partners constrains effective information flow 2.2: - annual number seizures/arrests - annual number of successful prosecutions WCU database Annually Project Manager/ M&E officer Coordinator IP WCU database; project reports Assumptions: Official national statistics are made available to the project as required in a timely manner Risks: Corruption and interference in enforcement operations
Project Outcome 4 Implementation and of project approaches at national and international levels is supported by effective knowledge management 4.1: - number of project lessons used by other national and international projects. Review of GEF GWP website, other websites and social media, reports on related projects, technical and scientific publications; communication with related project staff Annually Project Manager/ M&E officer Coordinator IP Reports from related projects; communications with GWP and related project staff Assumptions: project lessons are promptly and widely disseminated to other relevant projects. Risks: Synthesis and translation of M&E information into generation of lessons learned is often hampered by time constraints. Mid-term GEF Tracking Tools GEF GWP TT Baseline GEF GWP Tracking Tool included in Annex 4 After 2nd PIR submitted to GEF Project Manager and IP Completed GEF GWP Tracking Tool Assumptions: Continuous monitoring of project results on a quarterly basis will facilitate completion of the mid-term GEF GWP Tracking Tool prior to the MTR evaluation mission. Project team has the capacity and resources to complete the Tracking Tool Risks: Project team fails to conduct periodic monitoring of project results and therefore compromise the quality and completeness of the tracking tool. Lack of consistency in how the tracking tool are completed.
findings by the Project Board. Terminal Evaluation and management response N/A Independent evaluators Initiate 3 months before operation closure; to be submitted to GEF within three months of operational closure Independent Evaluators as contracted by UNDP UNDP Cleared TE Report Assumptions: The budgeted resources are sufficient to support a comprehensive TE process. Risks: The TE team do not have access to all stakeholders and fully updated and completed information on the project. There is a delayed or ineffective management response to the TE findings by the Project Board.
Annex 3 Evaluation Plan: Evaluation Title Planned start date Month/year Planned end date Month/year Included in the Country Office Evaluation Plan Budget for consultants Other budget (i.e. travel, site visits etc…) Budget for translation Terminal Evaluation Add date: 3 months before operation closure Add date: To be submitted to GEF within three months of operational closure Yes/No Mandatory USD 35,000 Travel: 5,000 5,000 Total evaluation budget USD 45,000
Annex 8 UNDP Risk Log: Description Type Impact & Probability, and Risk level Mitigation Measures Owner Status Enter a brief description of the risk Category of risk Describe the potential effect on the project if this risk were to occur: Probability P from 1 (low) to 5 (high) What actions have been taken/will be taken to counter this risk Who is appointed to keep an eye on this risk e.g. over, reducing, increasing, no change
effective and external threats are reduced but not eliminated; 3 -- Regulations are highly effectively enforced and all external threats are negated the information on poaching and IWT have strong advocacy and have national priority to allow buy-in and implementation within institutions. Furthermore, synchronization of data with relevant NGOs needs to be followed up to build better communication to achieve the goals. Prevention activities need to be conducted effectively in protecting the areas to reduce IWT. On the other hand, revision on regulations such as Permen 447/2003 and acceleration on revision of law UU 5/1990 are also necessary. Individual 14.Individuals are able to advance and develop professionally 0 -- No career tracks are developed and no training opportunities are provided; 1 -- Career tracks are weak and training possibilities are few and not managed transparently; 2 -- Clear career tracks developed and training available; HR management however has inadequate performance measurement system; 3 -- Individuals are able to advance and develop professionally 1 Career track for Forest Rangers as functional staff is reasonably clear, though it still need to be improved; one of them is related to increasing staff capacity through trainings. Due to limited resources, trainings can only be provided for limited numbers of personnel and sometime the criteria of selection staff to join the training are not clear and transparent. Individual 15.Individuals are appropriately skilled for their jobs 0 -- Skills of individuals do not match job requirements; 1 -- Individuals have some or poor skills for their jobs; 2 -- Individuals are reasonably skilled but could further improve for optimum match with job requirement; 3 -- Individuals are appropriately skilled for their jobs 2 Individuals are reasonably skilled but could further improve their skills to fulfill their job requirement. For example, some of the rangers posted at airport and seaport do not possess sufficient skills needed to identify important species; in other situation lack of intelligence skills, forensic skills, effective communication skills have been also identified. Recommendations to the project: Providing more knowledge materials for species identification, guideline for intelligence techniques, and other resource materials to allow forest rangers and other relevant authorities to learn about the issues independently – considering also the limited resources for training.