Journal article Review Grading Rubric Criteria Points Earned Feedback Feedback Ctrl-Left Click on links (underlined)… Summary (40 Points) Summary is 1 page of text and includes: --Concisely worded (but sufficient length in order to adequately provide a complete review of the article. Excellent Very Good Adequate Needs additional work --All or most major topics of the article are discussed: Excellent Very Good Adequate Needs additional work --If a research article: discusses research study, briefly describes hypotheses, methods, results, discussion, and implications. N.A. Excellent Very Good Adequate additional work Missing/Partial --Provides the foundation for the subsequent two sections of paper. Excellent Very Good Adequate Needs additional work Article chosen from list provided. Overall More Effort Needed Good Effort—I can see that you put a lot of effort into your Summary. Please see Feedback. 0 You have touched on some important core points. However, some core concepts were missing or underdeveloped. Please see “Core Concepts” for this article below. It was difficult at times to follow the points you were making because of errors in writing mechanics. In the Summary section, you must carefully provide citations for each and every assertion or statement you make. Summary lacked clarity in places Summary should flow from beginning to end with appropriate transitions between paragraphs. See: “” and “” Errors in writing mechanics detract from your narrative. Please review: “ Citations were inadequate or missing in places. Please consult: .
Well-written Summary—You did a good job of summarizing the article. Quality was above average. Exceptionally Well-Written— you summarized the article in a concise and adequately complete fashion, incorporating most of the core concepts. Content Reflection (15 Points) Reflection is approximately 1 page of text and includes: “Initial response to the article was given Missing/Partial “Design/methodology” was discussed (if appropriate) Missing/partial “Insights gained” were discussed. Missing/partial “Reasons for interest in topic” were- discussed Missing/partial “Future research interest based on topic” was discussed. Missing/partial 0 Thoughtful and insightful Good connection to core ideas in the article Good insights Your discussion was poignant and heartfelt. Thank you for sharing. Your “Reflection” did not adequately relate to the content of the article. This section was not sufficiently developed (1 page min.) More effort needed to “connect” with the concepts in the article. Content Application (30 Points) Application is approximately 1 page of text and includes. Student has applied the article’s core ideas to a specific human services counseling situation (describe the scenario and counseling issue). Article’s ideas clearly integrated, applied, and cited. Needs more work Core ideas not adequately integrated 0 Interesting counseling scenario Good integration and application of core ideas to your human services counseling situation Make sure you explain why you are integrating these techniques based on your assessment of the client. In the future, please describe a specific human services counseling situation (case study, etc.). See my Sample Journal Article Review More work is needed to incorporate/integrate the core of the article into your counseling scenario In-text citations need to be used for the core ideas that you are incorporating into your clinical scenario.