zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
STUDENT NAME: SIMS: PARENT/GUARDIAN NAME: PHONE: ADDRESS: WK PHONE: SCHOOL DISTRICT: SCHOOL: DOB: AGE: GRADE: GENDER: RACE: Meeting Date: Purpose of Meeting Initial Eligibility, IEP, Placement Annual Review of IEP Three Year Reevaluation Dismissal from Services - Date Effective: Parent Request Other: Date Services Begin: Annual Review Date: Date of Eligibility Determination: Three Year Reevaluation Due By: Discussed evaluation results/progress/assessment method Yes (Parent/Guardian initial) Student is eligible for special education or special education and related services as determined by the IEP team Yes No Copy of evaluation results received Yes (Parent/Guardian initial) An annual copy of Parent/Guardian Rights was received and reviewed (Date) (Parent/Guardian Initial) Transition Planning Needed No Yes (*If yes, attach applicable transition pages.) A copy of the IEP was provided to parent/guardian Yes (Parent/Guardian Initial) Primary Disability: IEP Team Membership Signature Date Parent/Guardian Parent/Guardian Student School Representative General Education Teacher Special Education Teacher or Provider Speech/Language Pathologist Individual who can interpret evaluation results Other: Other:
Least Restrictive Environment The IEP Team must ensure that, to the maximum extent appropriate, students with disabilities are educated with nondisabled peers, including extracurricular services and activities. Continuum of Alternative Placements 0100 General Classroom with Modifications 80-100% 0110 Resource Room 40-79% 0120 Self-Contained Classroom 0-39% 0130 Separate Day School 0140 Residential Facility 0150 Home/Hospital Continuum of Alternative Placements (Ages 3-5) 0310 Early Childhood Setting-10 hrs./week A1-services in EC program 0315 Early Childhood Setting-10hrs/week A2-services in other location 0325 Early Childhood Setting-Less than 10hrs/wk. B-1 – services in EC program 0330 Early Childhood Setting-Less than 10hrs/wk. B2 – services in other location 0335 Separate Class 0345 Separate School 0355 Residential Facility 0365 Home 0375 Service Provider Location Participation with Non-Disabled Peers Program Options Non-Academic Extracurricular Art Counseling Athletics Industrial Technology Meals Clubs Music Employment Referrals Groups Vocational Education Recess Recreation Family & Consumer Science Health Services Other Other Other Comments: Justification for Placement--An explanation of the extent, if any, to which the student will not participate with students in regular classes and non-academic activities. (Please use accept/reject format for each alternative placement considered.) The team addressed the potential harmful effects of the special education placement. Extended School Year Extended School Year Services: needed not needed to be determined by (Date)
The ratio of Indigenous to nonIndigenous expenditure per person in Queensland was 1.94:1 ($5869 per Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australian compared with $3026 per nonIndigenous Australian). Healthy lives This includes expenditure on hospital services; public and community health services; and other health care subsidies and support services. The ratio of Indigenous to nonIndigenous expenditure per person in Queensland was 1.70:1 ($7411 per Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australian compared with $4352 per nonIndigenous Australian). Economic participation This includes expenditure on labour and employment services and social security support. The ratio of Indigenous to nonIndigenous expenditure per person in Queensland was 1.58:1 ($7447 per Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australian compared with $4720 per nonIndigenous Australian). Home environment This includes expenditure on housing services; community and environment services; and transport and communications services. The ratio of Indigenous to nonIndigenous expenditure per person in Queensland was 1.60:1 ($3985 per Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australian compared with $2487 per nonIndigenous Australian). Safe and supportive communities This includes expenditure on public order and safety; community support and welfare; and recreation and culture. The ratio of Indigenous to nonIndigenous expenditure per person in Queensland was 3.64:1 ($9293 per Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australian compared with $2553 per nonIndigenous Australian). Other government expenditure This includes expenditure on general government (such as the operations of legislative and executive affairs and defence services); and support to industry. The ratio of Indigenous to nonIndigenous expenditure per person in Queensland was 1.02:1 ($4535 per Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australian compared with $4463 per nonIndigenous Australian).
Mögliche Werte: 1 => 0 => Empfehlung: Dieses Setting sollte – sofern keine Probleme bekannt sind – auf dem Standardwert (enabled/1) bleiben.
water supply — supply of fresh water for drinking and domestic purposes including public health issues related to the domestic water supply, and the expansion and operation of water supply systems sanitation, waste management and environment protection — the management of household and industrial waste, sewerage, street cleaning and urban stormwater drainage management, and the protection and conservation of the environment fuel and energy supply — the administration, regulation, planning, support and operation of electricity, gas and other fuelbased industries transport and communications services — services that support connections within and across communities, such as road, rail and air transport, pipelines and communication services (postal, cable, telephone and wireless communications systems and satellites). Safe and supportive communities Safe and supportive community services promote an environment in which Australians can feel safe from violence, abuse and neglect, and are able to engage in the communities in which they live. Expenditure in the 2014 Report includes government outlays on: public order and safety services that ensure a safe home environment and equitable access to the legal system and services and which reduce the consequences of criminal activity, including: police services — expenditure on areas including crime and corruption commissions, criminal investigation, traffic and commuter services (such as road safety and the safety of commuters using public transport), and community safety and support including crime prevention and responding to calls for assistance law courts and legal services — expenditure on areas including criminal court services, other courts and legal services (such as civil courts and native title), and access to justice including legal assistance services and policy and law reform prison and corrective services — expenditure on areas including juvenile and adult communitybased and facilitybased detention and corrective services other public order — expenditure on metropolitan and other fire protection services, and other public order and safety services (such as maintenance of state emergency services), and lifesaving and beach patrols community support and welfare services that assist people who need help to meet the challenges that arise in their day-to-day lives, such as: welfare for the aged — expenditure on nursing for the aged, welfare services for the aged including support programs, and home and residential care services welfare services for people with a disability — expenditure on accommodation support, community support, community access and other disability support such as employment services protection and support services — expenditure on child protection and outofhome care services general family and support services — expenditure on child support payments and family support, including intensive family support
TO: IERC Commission Members FROM: Ian Ewusi, IERC Field Representative DATE: May 4, 2015 SUBJECT: 2015 LEPC Status Funding Report The following is a list of 82 LEPC I recommend to receive funding in 2015 for meeting 2014 funding/statutory requirements. LEPCs must comply with Indiana Codes 6-6-10-8, 6-6-10-9, 13-25-2-5, 13-25-2-14 and 4-2-7-3 to receive funding. The requirements are legal notice, fiscal report, roster, bylaws, meeting minutes, exercise and plan updates. Adams Allen Bartholomew Boone Clay ** Clinton Daviess Dearborn Decatur ** DeKalb Delaware Dubois Elkhart Fayette Fountain Franklin Fulton Gibson Grant Greene Hamilton Hancock ** Harrison Hendricks Henry Howard Huntington** Jackson Jasper Jay Jefferson Jennings Johnson Knox Kosciusko LaGrange LaPorte Lawrence Madison Marion Marshall Monroe Montgomery Morgan Newton ** Noble Ohio Orange ** Owen Parke Perry Pike Porter Posey Pulaski Putnam Randolph Ripley Rush Scott Shelby Spencer St. Joseph Steuben Sullivan Tippecanoe Tipton Union Vanderburgh Vermillion Vigo ** Wabash Warren Warrick Washington Wayne Wells White Whitley ** Counties not funded in 2014 due to non-compliance or inactivity
oral/nasal mask ventilation 3. unsuccessful intubation attempt ▪ VS: BP 140/95, HR 130, SaO2 84% ▪ 4 view on direct laryngoscopy, SaO2 80% ▪ if resident continues to to intubate SaO2 continues to fall to 60% ▪ easy LMA placement with adequate ventilation after placement ▪ SaO2 improves to 92% ▪ grade 4 view on direct laryngoscopy x 1 ▪ communicates grade 4 view to team, requests cricoid pressure without improved view ▪ requests and places LMA correctly ▪ Recognizes rise, fog in LMA, confirms breath sounds ▪ calls for anesthesiology and surgical backup, prepare for cricothyroidotomy /tracheostomy if necessary ▪ Do not repeat failed technique-change blades, optimize patient position, etc ▪ LMA as rescue device in difficult airway algorithm ▪ discuss potential for additional airway trauma/fixation errors with multiple DL attempts, consequences of delaying definitive management of hypoxia ▪ call for anesthesiology and possibly surgery help in potential difficult airway situation 4. team planning for definitive airway ▪ SaO2 92% with LMA in ▪ BP 115/56, HR 115 ▪ assesses and summarizes situation with ICU team ▪ calls for anesthesiology and surgical backup, prepare for cricothyroidotomy /tracheostomy if necessary ▪ consider alternatives to secure blade, LMA as intubating conduit, FOB, etc ▪ ensure optimal patient positioning ▪ leadership and communication critical during management of airway ▪ call for help early with difficult airway, before problem becomes 5. secures airway ▪ SaO2 rises to 95%, BP 125/65, HR 120 ▪ communicates 3 view to team with change to airway management (new blade/position, etc) ▪ communicates successful intubation to team ▪ confirms ETCO2, +EBBS after intubation ▪ helps RT secure ETT and get patient on vent ▪ calls for anesthesiology and surgical backup, prepare for cricothyroidotomy /tracheostomy if necessary ▪ inform team and write a detailed airway what was effective for this patient ▪ call for help early with difficult airway, before problem becomes Debriefing Note handed trial
Samuel Rude Memorial Scholarship A ONE YEAR SCHOLARSHIP WITH REAPPLICATION POSSIBLE. The application, accompanied by supporting documentation, must be postmarked no later than March 15th. The following criteria will be used to screen applicants: Relation to a current or retired IEASO member in good standing GPA/academic achievement Economic need Community involvement involvement Labor essay Student program Most current High School transcripts including college transcripts, if applicable Employment history Two (2) letters of recommendation, not written by relatives ONLY COMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED. ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION MUST ACCOMPANY THE APPLICATION. MISSING DOCUMENTATION WILL INVALIDATE THE APPLICATION. All applications and essays must be typed. The IEASO Memorial Scholarship Committee is available to answer any questions. Please address all questions to . The selection will not discriminate on the basis of age, sex, sexual orientation, race, marital status, disability, religion, or national origin. The applicant selected as a scholarship recipient must sign an agreement which sets forth specific guidelines regarding the scholarship. The agreement addresses the following: Use of the scholarship (tuition, related fees, books, supplies) Maintenance of GPA Repayment of scholarship should the applicant leave school THIS APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY ALL OF THE FOLLOWING
3.1 SUBSECTION HERE The subsection header uses the same format; you may also use the auto section numbering feature in MSWord if you prefer. Because this document is really a short paper it should not be necessary to use more than one level of subsection to organize the content effectively. Also, please include page numbers in the footnote, preferably centered on the page. N. CONCLUSIONS Always nice to draw some conclusions at the end of the paper to help your readers appreciate the results of your labors. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Authors may wish to acknowledge the contributions of non-coauthors or the source(s) of support for their work. REFERENCES Franklin, B., Adams, J. Q., & Washington, G. (1776). Formatting Techniques for the Ionospheric Effect Symposium: A Type-Setter’s Perspective. Advances in Formatting Research, 38(2), Revere, P. & Paine, T. (1782). A Rebel’s Common Sense Treatise on IES Standards and Procedures. Format Science, 32(5), 2047-2064.
Building and Dealing with Change Paula Davis Region 21 2017 Intl. President/Faculty Leadership at Work: Building Trust and Dealing with Change “You can’t have success without trust. The word embodies almost everything you can strive for that will help you to succeed.” Jeff Burke, Former CEO of Johnson & Johnson Trust is confidence in: Character – Integrity and Intent Competence – Capabilities and Results Works! ABCD Trust Model A – Able Demonstrates Competence B – Believable Acting with Integrity C – Connected Demonstrating Care & Concern for Others D – Dependable Reliably following through on what you say you will do (Results) Low Trust Behaviors High Trust Behaviors Manipulate or distort facts Information shared openly Getting the credit is very important Real collaboration Spin the truth to their advantage Share credit abundantly New ideas resisted & stifled Culture of Creativity/Innovation Mistakes covered up Mistakes embraced for growth Have “undiscussables” Transparency is a practiced value Overpromise & Underdeliver High degree of Accountability Energy low Palpable vitality & energy To Build or Improve Trust: Demonstrate Trust and Respect Create Transparency – communicate proactively Talk straight with compassion– open and honest Admit Mistakes & Right Wrongs
IESANZ Membership Subscriptions 2018-19 Grade New Subs – Australian Members including GST New Subs – New Zealand Members New Subs – Overseas Members (Not NZ) AssocIES A$230.00 NZ$230.00 A$210.00 TechIES A$290.00 NZ$285.00 A$260.00 MIES A$345.00 NZ$345.00 A$315.00 FIES A$345.00 NZ$345.00 A$315.00 Student A$110.00 NZ$110.00 A$100.00 Associes (RETIRED) A$110.00 NZ$110.00 A$100.00 TechIES (RETIRED) A$110.00 NZ$110.00 A$100.00 MIES (RETIRED) A$110.00 NZ$110.00 A$100.00 FIES (RETIRED) A$110.00 NZ$110.00 A$100.00 CORPORATE (1 Zone) A$650.00 NZ$645.00 A$590.00 CORPORATE (2 Zones) A$1,220.00 NZ$1,215.00 A$1,110.00 CORPORATE (3 Zones) A$1,800.00 NZ$1,790.00 A$1,635.00 CORPORATE (4 Zones) A$2,380.00 NZ$2,370.00 A$2,165.00 CORPORATE (5 Zones) A$2,960.00 NZ$2,940.00 A$2,690.00 CORPORATE (6 Zones) A$3,480.00 NZ $3,455.00 A$3,165.00 Honorary/Life Members A$0.00 NZ$0.00 A$0.00
multiple payloads When a success or failure response is received from application Same in CG 1.0 & CG there is no Business Validation changes) Same in CG 1.0 & CG there is no Business Validation changes) When the sender’s domain is not authorized or cannot be authorized <soapenv:Fault <soapenv:Code> <soapenv:Subcode> <soapenv:Value>Organization not Authorized.</soapenv:Value> </soapenv:Subcode> </soapenv:Code> <soapenv:Reason> <soapenv:Text>Organization is not authorized. Please contact Customer Service.</soapenv:Text> </soapenv:Reason> <soapenv:Node>Direct Gateway</soapenv:Node> <soapenv:Detail> xmlns:urn="urn:ihe:iti:xds-b:2007"> <urn:payload>Please Contact Mass HiWay Customer Service</urn:payload> </soapenv:Detail> </soapenv:Fault> Organization is not Authorized When the message could not be delivered to the IEATS application <soapenv:Fault <soapenv:Code> <soapenv:Subcode> </soapenv:Subcode> </soapenv:Code> <soapenv:Reason> Failed to process the request, please contact Mass Hiway Customer Service
Enabler Map Leadership – Overview Page (max. 1 page) This may include: Additional high level information of the overall Leadership strategy/approach in your organisation Leadership– Enabler Map (max. 2 Approach Title Description Evidence Available Linkages & Key Results <insert rows to table above as needed> Leadership – Enabler Map continued Approach Title Description Evidence Available Linkages & Key Results
Approach Title Description Evidence Available Linkages & Key Results <insert rows to table above as needed> People – Overview Page (max. 1 page) This may include: Additional high level information of the overall People strategy/approach in your organisation People – Enabler Map (max. 2 pages) Approach Title Description Evidence Available Linkages & Key Results <insert rows to table above as needed>
People – Enabler Map - continued Approach Title Description Evidence Available Linkages & Key Results <insert rows to table above as needed> Partnerships & Resources – Overview Page (max. 1 page) This may include: Additional high level information of the overall Partnerships & Resources strategy/approach in your organisation Partnerships & Resources – Enabler Map (max. 2 pages) Approach Title Description Evidence Available Linkages & Key Results
<insert rows to table above as needed> Processes, Products and Services – Enabler Map - continued Approach Title Description Evidence Available Linkages & Key Results <insert rows to table above as needed> Key Results Criterion 6 – Overview page (max 1 page) In this section, please make an introduction to the Customer Results (what you measure, why and how) This may include: Additional information on your customer base/strategy Target setting process Selection of benchmarks/comparisons etc. Criterion 6a - Customer results – Perception Please include the key indicators of your customer feedback systems obtained from surveys, focus groups, ratings, compliments, complaints etc.
Criterion 6b - Customer results – Performance indicators Please include in this section indicators that give clear understanding of the deployment and impact of the organisation’s customer strategy, supporting policies and processes. Criterion 7 – Overview page (max 1 page) In this section, please make an introduction to the People Results (what you measure, why and how)
3. Employment History. Please give details of previous held in any paid employment or voluntary work. Please start with your most recent post and work backwards, accounting for all gaps in employment history. If you require more space, please continue on a separate sheet and attach to your application form. Job Title ( or nature of activity if not employment) Name & Address of Employer (if applicable) Dates (from – to) Brief description of duties / areas of responsibility 4. Education/Training and Development. Please enter details of your education and training as requested below. Where qualifications are required for the post, as specified in the Employee Specification, you will be required to provide proof of these prior to confirmation of appointment. Please continue on a separate sheet if necessary and attach to your application. 4a.Secondary and Further Education. Please enter details of your Secondary Education and Further Education including details of qualifications obtained. School / College (name and address) Dates Attended (from – to) Qualifications Year of Award Subject Level Grade 4b. Higher Education and Professional Qualifications.
Advice to decision maker on coal mining project IESC 2016-081: New Acland Coal Mine Stage 3 (EPBC 2007/3423) – Expansion Requesting agency The Australian Government Department of the Environment and Energy Date of request 2 November 2016 Date request accepted 2 November 2016 Advice stage Assessment Context The Independent Expert Scientific Committee on Coal Seam Gas and Large Coal Mining Development (the IESC) was requested by the Australian Government Department of the Environment and Energy to provide advice on the New Acland Coal Mine Stage 3 project (the proposed project) in Queensland. The IESC has provided advice to the former Commonwealth Department of the Environment and the Queensland Office of the Coordinator-General on the draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed New Acland Coal Mine Stage 3 project, EPBC 2007/3423 (IESC 2014-045 dated 10 April 2014). On 10 December 2015, the IESC provided additional advice to the former Commonwealth Department of the Environment on residual matters from the proponent’s Additional Information to the Environmental Impact Statement (AEIS) for the proposed New Acland Coal Mine Stage 3 project, EPBC 2007/3423 (IESC 2015-073). Both pieces of advice are available on the IESC ‘Advice to regulators on development proposals’ website at This advice draws upon aspects of information on the New Acland Coal Mine Stage 3 project within the assessment documentation and documents provided to the IESC between 10 December 2015 and 8 December 2016, together with the expert deliberations of the IESC. The project documentation and information accessed by the IESC, including additional information provided by the proponent, are listed in the source documentation at the end of this advice. The proposed project is to expand the New Acland Coal Mine located approximately 35 km northwest of Toowoomba, extending the mining period by up to 12 years. The proposed project is located in the Lagoon Creek Catchment and the Clarence-Moreton Basin of Queensland. Lagoon Creek is an ephemeral creek that flows into Oakey Creek, which is part of the larger Condamine River Catchment of the Murray-Darling Basin. The proposed project would involve creation of three open cut pits to increase production of coal from the Walloon Coal Measures from 4.8 Mtpa to 7.5 Mtpa of thermal product coal. Ancillary infrastructure development is proposed to include upgrading the existing coal
2. Executive summary Advice to regulators The primary role of the Committee is to provide expert scientific advice on the water-related impacts of coal seam gas and large coal mining development proposals to the Australian and state government regulators. In 2017–18 the Committee provided advice on nine proposed coal resource development projects in New South Wales and Queensland. IESC Research Symposium In June 2018 we hosted the IESC Research Symposium at the Brisbane Convention Exhibition Centre. The symposium attracted around 200 attendees including representatives from regulators, government agencies, community organisations, industry peak bodies, coal resource companies, consultants and research organisations. It increased participants’ awareness of advances in our understanding of the potential impacts of coal resource development on Australia’s water resources. Site visits The Committee undertook a number of site visits to increase our understanding of site operations. The destinations included Centennial Coal’s Mandalong underground coal mine, the University of New South Wales Water research laboratory centrifuge permeameter facility, and the University of Queensland Centre for Coal Seam Gas.. Engagement activities The Committee continued to engage directly with regulators, industry, researchers and interest groups to explain our role and review our approach and how advice is adopted in regulatory decisions. Our engagement activities also included targeted consultation on the update to the Information Guidelines and explanatory notes. Information Guidelines and explanatory notes In May 2018 we released an update of the IESC Information Guidelines. These guidelines aim to assist proponents to provide adequate assessment documentation to enable the IESC to understand, consider and provide advice on the potential impacts of development proposals on water resources. We are developing a range of explanatory notes to support the Information Guidelines by providing more specific and detailed guidance on priority matters. 3. The Committee The Committee consists of eight members, appointed on a part-time basis by the Australian Government Minister with responsibility for the environment. Each member has extensive scientific qualifications and expertise in geology, hydrogeology, hydrology, ecology or ecotoxicology.
MINUTES – Meeting 11 16-17 October 2013 Old Parliament House, Canberra Attendance and Apologies IN ATTENDANCE Ms Lisa Corbyn (Chair) Emeritus Professor Angela Arthington Ms Jane Coram Emeritus Professor Flood Mr Jim McDonald Professor Dayanthi Nugegoda Professor Craig Simmons APOLOGIES Dr Andrew Johnson OFFICE OF WATER SCIENCE (OWS) - SECRETARIAT AND SUPPORT Suzy Nethercott-Watson Gayle Milnes Peter Baker Scott Lawson Crystal Bradley Caryn Scott Milica Milanja OTHER STAFF OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT Edwina Johnson (Days 1-2: Items 2.1, 2.2, 4.5) Office of Water Science Bruce Gray (Days 1-2: Items 3.1-3.7) Office of Water Science Ben Roundnew (Day 1-2: Items 2.2, 3.1-3.7) Office of Water Science Casa Dalton (Day 2: Item 3.2) Office of Water Science Ebony Coote (Days 1-2: Items 2.1, 2.2, 4.5) Office of Water Science Beynon (Day 2: Items 3.3-3.6) Office of Water Science Kate Bayliss (Day 2: Item 3.3-3.6) Office of Water Science Rachel Bowman (Day 1: Item 4.5) Office of Water Science Kimberley Hammond (Days 1-2: Items 4.3, 4.4) Office of Water Science Anna-Liisa Lahtinen (Day 2: Item 3.5, 3.6) Office of Water Science Sophie Alexander (Days 1-2: Items 4.3, 4.4) Office of Water Science Christine McKnight (Day 2: Items 3.5, 3.6) Office of Water Science Moya Tomlinson (Day 2: Items 3.3-3.6) Office of Water Science Emily Turner (Day 2: Items 3.3-3.6) Office of Science
MINUTES – Meeting 14 5-6 February 2014 Old Parliament House, Canberra Attendance and Apologies IN ATTENDANCE Ms Lisa Corbyn (Chair) Emeritus Professor Angela Arthington Ms Jane Coram Emeritus Professor Flood Dr Andrew Johnson (by telephone) Mr Jim McDonald Professor Dayanthi Nugegoda Professor Craig Simmons APOLOGIES Nil OFFICE OF WATER SCIENCE (OWS) - SECRETARIAT AND SUPPORT Suzy Nethercott-Watson Gayle Milnes Peter Baker Scott Lawson Sean Lane Caryn Scott Milica Milanja STAFF OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT Fiona Beynon (Days 1-2) Office of Water Science Edwina Johnson (Day 1: Item 4) Office of Water Science Pamela Finger (Day 2: Item 3) Office of Water Science Craig Moore (Days 1-2) Office of Water Science Anne Riesz (Days 1-2: Items 2, 3, 4.1) Office of Water Science Crystal Bradley (Days 1-2: Items 1, 2) Office of Water Science Bruce Gray (Days 1-2: Items 3, 4.1) Office of Water Science Anna-Liisa Lahtinen (Days 1-2: Item 2) Office of Water Science Max Collett (Days 1-2: Item 2) Office of Water Science Anu Datta (Days 1-2: Item 2) Office of Water Science Kimberley Hammond (Day 1: Item 5) Office of Water Science Christine McKnight (Days 1-2: Item 2) Office of Water Science Emily Turner (Days 1-2: Item 2) Office of Water Science Moya Tomlinson (Days 1-2: Item 2) Office of Science Ebony Coote (Day 2: Item 5) Office of Water Science Liam Curtis (Days 1-2: Item 2) Office of Water Science
MINUTES – Meeting 23 Old Parliament House, Canberra ACT Attendance and Apologies IN ATTENDANCE Ms Lisa Corbyn (Chair) Professor Simmons (Deputy Chair) Emeritus Professor Angela Arthington Ms Jane Coram Emeritus Professor Peter Flood Mr Jim McDonald APOLOGIES Professor Dayanthi Nugegoda Dr Andrew Johnson OFFICE OF WATER SCIENCE (OWS) - SECRETARIAT AND SUPPORT Gayle Milnes Sean Lane Smith Kimberley Hammond Helen Vooren OTHER STAFF OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT Sophie Alexander (Item 1) Office of Water Science Craig Moore (Item 2) Office of Water Science Lawson (Item 2) Office of Water Science Rod Dann (Item 2) Office of Science Kim Bennett (Item 2) Office of Water Science Emily Turner (Item 2) Office of Water Science Edwina Johnson (Item 3) Office of Water Science Peter Baker (Item 3) Office of Water Science Anthony Swirepik (Item 4) Office of Water Science Moya Tomlinson (Item 4) Office of Water Science Bruce Gray (Item 4) Office of Water Science Steven Kennedy Deputy Secretary Department of the Environment OBSERVERS Anna Newton-Walters (Item 4) Office of Water Science Rachael England (Item 4) Office of Water Science The meeting commenced at 9.15 am on 12 November 2014. 1. Welcome and Introductions
MINUTES Dialogue Business Centre, Canberra ACT Attendance and Apologies IN ATTENDANCE Dr Andrew Johnson (Chair) Professor Craig Simmons (Deputy Chair) Dr Andrew Boulton Ms Jane Emeritus Professor Peter Flood Dr Tom Hatton APOLOGIES Dr Stauber OFFICE OF WATER SCIENCE (OWS) - SECRETARIAT AND SUPPORT Milnes Sean Lane Ann Hartley OTHER STAFF OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT Craig Moore (Item 2) Office of Water Science Carl Zimmerman (Item 2) Office of Water Science Rod Dann (Item 2) Office of Water Science Scott Lawson (Item 2) Office of Water Science Susanne Busch (Item 2) Office of Water Science Ben Roundnew (Item 2) Office of Science Philippa Higgins (Item 2) Office of Water Science Melissa Liu (Item 2) Office of Water Science Anthony Swirepik (Item 3) Office of Water Science Moya Tomlinson (Item 4) Office of Water Science Peter Baker (Item 3) Office of Water Science Bruce Gray (Item 4) Office of Water Science James Hill (Item 3) Office of Science John Higgins (Item 4) Office of Water Science Geraldine Cusack (Item 3) Office of Science INVITED GUESTS Brent Henderson (Item 3) CSIRO Bronwyn Ray (Item 3) Bureau of Meteorology Simon Barry (Item 3) CSIRO David Post (Item 3) CSIRO Becky Schmidt (Item 3) CSIRO Steven Lewis (Item 3) Geoscience Australia The meeting commenced at 9.00 am on 22 July 2015. 1. Welcome and Introductions
LARGE DEVELOPMENT AGENDA Meeting 34 conference 14 April 2016 Welcome and Opening Remarks – Attendance and Apologies 1 Standing Items 1.1 Acknowledgement of Country Standing Item 1.2 Disclosure of Interests Standing Item 1.3 Confirmation of Agenda Standing Item 2 Bioregional Assessments 3.1 Bioregional Assessments update Standing Item 3 Research 3.1 Research update Standing Item 4 Other Business 4.1 Meeting Summary For Discussion
LARGE DEVELOPMENT AGENDA Meeting 35 18-19 May 2016 Welcome and Opening Remarks – Attendance and Apologies 1 Standing Items 1.1 Acknowledgement of Country Standing Item 1.2 Disclosure of Interests Standing Item 1.3 Confirmation of Agenda Standing Item 1.4 Action Items Standing Item 1.5 Confirmation of Out-of-Session Decisions Standing Item 1.6 Correspondence Standing Item 1.7 Environmental Scan Standing Item 1.8 Forward Planning Agenda Standing Item 2 Advice on Projects referred by Regulators 2.1 Hillalong Coal Mine For Decision 3 Bioregional Assessments 3.1 Bioregional Assessments update Standing Item 4 Research 4.1 Research update Standing Item 5 Other Business 5.1 Meeting Summary For Discussion 5.2 IESC Operating Protocols For Decision
assessments are made at the meeting. 3 Jane Coram I consider there may be a possible conflict of interest in relation to agenda item 3 arising from my agency’s (Geoscience Australia) involvement in the development of the BRAM and its potential involvement in the future bioregional assessments. No actual, potential or perceived conflict of interest exists and Ms Coram participated fully in the meeting. The reason for this decision is the agenda item is solely on the Bioregional Assessment Methodology and no decisions on projects associated with bioregional assessments are being made at the meeting.
MINUTES Canberra Attendance and Apologies IN ATTENDANCE Dr Chris Pigram (Chair) Professor Craig Simmons Dr Jenny Stauber Dr Andrew Boulton Dr Wendy Timms Professor Joan Esterle Dr Ian Prosser Dr Glen Walker APOLOGIES Nil SECRETARIAT AND SUPPORT Matthew Dadswell Emily Grant Ann Hartley STAFF OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY Anthony Swirepik Office of Water Science John Higgins (Items 3 and 5.3) Office of Water Science Rod Dann Office of Water Science Natasha Amerasinghe Office of Water Science Carl Zimmerman (Item 5.5) Office of Water Science Peter Baker Office of Water Science Mitchell Bouma (Item 5.5) Office of Water Science Kim Bennett (Item 5.5) Office of Water Science Jo Brennan (Item 5.2 and 5.4) Office of Water Science Taysha Le Compte (Item 5.5) Office of Water Science Andrew Stacey (Item 3.1) Office of Water Science Miriam McMillan (Item 5.2 and 5.4) Office of Water Science David Thomas (Item 3.1) Office of Water Science John Higgins (Item 3.1 and 5.3) Office of Water Science Erin Higuchi (Item 5.7) General Counsel Branch Alan Hilvert-Bruce (Item 5.7) General Counsel Branch Silvie Eckhardt (Item 5.7) General Counsel Branch The meeting commenced at 8.50 am on 15 June 2017. 1. Welcome and Introductions
MINUTES Sydney Attendance and Apologies IN ATTENDANCE Dr Chris Pigram (Chair) Professor Craig Simmons Professor Joan Esterle Dr Jenny Stauber (day 1) Dr Andrew Boulton Dr Wendy Timms Dr Ian Prosser APOLOGY Dr Glen Walker Dr Jenny Stauber (day 2) SECRETARIAT AND SUPPORT Matthew Dadswell Emily Grant Benjamin Klug Ann Hartley STAFF OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY Peter Baker Office of Water Science Mio Kuhnen Office of Water Science Mitchell Bouma Office of Water Science Jo Brennan Office of Water Science INVITED GUESTS Professor Bruce Hebblewhite (Item 4.2) University of New South Wales The meeting commenced at 8:30am on 14 November 2017. 1. Welcome and Introductions The Chair, Dr Chris Pigram, welcomed members of the Independent Expert Scientific Committee on Coal Seam Gas and Large Coal Mining Development (IESC) to the meeting. 1.1 Acknowledgement of country The Chair acknowledged the traditional owners, past and present, on whose land this meeting was held. 1.2 Declaration of interest
Research Scientific advice on research priorities The IESC provides scientific advice to the Minister for the Environment and Energy on priorities and projects for the Australian Government’s research into the water-related impacts of coal seam gas and large coal mining development. The research aims to strengthen the science underpinning regulatory decisions, including by informing the advice the IESC provides to regulators. For example, during 2015-16, the IESC cited Australian Government research products in its advice to regulators on peat swamps and management of subsidence due to longwall coal mining. The IESC has previously provided advice on priorities for new research to address knowledge gaps. This advice concentrated on areas of high risk, significant knowledge gaps and where there was potential to produce outputs of national significance within three years. The IESC also took into account current and emerging research being undertaken in Australia and overseas. This process identified research across three priority themes: Hydrology—improved scientific understanding and modelling of alterations to groundwater and surface water characteristics and processes. Ecosystems and water—strengthening knowledge of potential impacts on key species and ecosystems, as well as methods for monitoring and mitigating these impacts. Chemicals— improved scientific understanding of coal seam gas chemicals, their movement in surface and groundwater systems, and their toxicity. Cumulative impacts are also of interest and form a cross-cutting issue that is informed by bioregional assessments and research in the priority themes. The Australian Government Department of the Environment and Energy progressed priority research projects within these themes. Reports from 17 projects have been published. Given the progress made in the research program, the IESC has decided to undertake a review of its advice on research priorities. Preliminary consultation was carried out during 2015-16, and further consultation is planned. This review is expected to conclude in the 2017 calendar year. Case study: Research to inform the assessment of ecohydrological responses to coal seam gas extraction and coal mining This two-year research program is focused on ecohydrological responses to variations in interaction of the kind that might be expected due to coal seam gas extraction and coal mining developments. It is being carried out in two catchments, one in New South Wales and one in Queensland, in accordance with a detailed work plan agreed to by the IESC in 2015. The program has four major research components: Ecohydrology of groundwater dependent terrestrial vegetation. The objective is to understand the impacts of altered groundwater regimes as a result of coal seam gas and coal mining developments on groundwater dependent vegetation in different biophysical settings.
REQUEST FOR USE OF FACILITY COURTS IEBTsports 2425 Hubbell Ave | Des Moines, IA 50317 Phone: 515-943-1970 E-mail: DATE OF APPLICATION: NAME OF EVENT/TEAM/ORGANIZATION: CONTACT PERSON (RENTER/CLIENT): MAILING ADDRESS: EMAIL ADDRESS: CONTACT NUMBER: ESTIMATED PARTICIPANT COUNT: □ ½ COURT □ FULL COURT 1 □ FULL COURT 2 OPEN TO THE PUBLIC: YES / NO (Circle one) □ Training Room 1 □ Training Room2 DATE(S) REQUESTED: TIME NEEDED FOR USE OF THE FACILITY: AM/PM UNTIL AM/PM (INCLUDE SET UP TIME) AM/PM UNTIL AM/PM AM/PM UNTIL AM/PM PURPOSE/EVENT: □ PRACTICE □ TOURNAMENT □ CAMPS/CLINIC □ LEAGUE □ TRYOUTS □ PARTY RENTAL GENERAL FACILITY GUIDELINES: IEBTsports has the option of closing gym without notice or refund if an event being held is/or may cause disruption. Smoking is NOT permitted in any part of IEBTsports and the Renter/Client is responsible to ensure that its guests and personnel all abide with this policy. The Renter/Client will be responsible for all participants as well as the property during their scheduled time. The Renter/Client is also responsible for ensuring proper use of the facility by non-group members/spectators during the scheduled event. Renter/Client will provide own athletic equipment. No storage will be provided. The IEBTsports is NOT responsible for any equipment, supplies, money or other property left on the premises. Renter/Client will be responsible for any cost incurred as a result of misuse or abuse of the building, equipment, fixtures or landscaping resulting from the use of IEBTsports . Renter/Client is responsible to clean and leave the premises in the same condition as found at the beginning of the rental period. Trash and debris must all be picked up. The cost of any cleaning or repairs required by the IEBTsports will be charged to the renter/user at a rate of $75 per day and/event. IEBTsports will only be responsible for daily court maintenance. Renter/Client will convey and monitor that ONLY the Gymnasium/Restroom/Lobby/Parking area are designated for use, while the other components of the facility are off limits. Renter/Client is responsible for communicating IEBTsports policies and procedures to all participants and visitors attending the scheduled event.
Applying Security to Power System Operations Understanding the Security Requirements and Impact of Security Measures on Power System Operations Power system operations pose many security challenges that are different from most other industries. For instance, most security measures were developed to counter hackers on the Internet. The Internet environment is vastly different from the power system operations environment. Therefore, in the security industry there is typically a lack of understanding of the security requirements and the potential impact of security measures on the communication requirements of power system operations. In particular, the security services and technologies have been developed primarily for industries that do not have many of the strict performance and reliability requirements that are needed by system operations. For instance: Preventing an authorized dispatcher from accessing power system substation controls could have more serious consequences than preventing an authorized customer from accessing his banking account. Therefore, denial-of-service is far more important than in many typical Internet transactions. Many communication channels used in the power industry are narrowband, thus not permitting some of the overhead needed for certain security measures, such as encryption and key exchanges. Most systems and equipment are located in wide-spread, unmanned, remote sites with no access to the Internet. This makes key management and some other security measures difficult to implement. Many systems are connected by multi-drop communication channels, so normal network security measures cannot work. Although wireless communications are becoming widely used for many applications, utilities will need to be very careful where they implement these wireless technologies, partly because of the noisy electrical environment of substations, and partly because of the very rapid and extremely reliable response required by some applications. Security Measures Important to System Operations Resilience is the basic requirement for power system operations. Resiliency implies that the power system critical infrastructure is designed not only to prevent malicious attacks and inadvertent failures, but also to cope with and recover from such attacks and failures in a timely manner. Resilience requires a combination of cyber security and power system engineering design and procedures. Defense-in-depth is critical. Because of the large variety of communication methods and performance characteristics, as well as because no single security measure can counter all types of threats, it is expected than multiple layers of security measures will be implemented. For instance, cyber security measures may prevent some but not all attacks
IE Challenge Local Hotel List Holiday Inn Express 31573 Canyon Estates Drive Lake Elsinore, CA 92532 951.674.4333 Advanced purchase rates avail Free hot breakfast Free WiFi Gym/Fitness Center Comfort Inn 41005 California Oaks Rd Murrieta, CA 92562 951.894.7227 Advanced purchase rates avail Free breakfast Free WiFi Gym/Fitness Center Hampton Inn and Suites 28190 Jefferson Ave Temecula, CA 92590 951.506.2331 Free hot breakfast Free internet Gym/Fitness Center Fairfield Inn & Suites 27416 Jefferson Ave Temecula, CA, 92590 951.587.9800 Free breakfast Free high-speed internet Gym/Fitness Center Residence Inn by Marriott 25407 Madison Ave, Murrieta, CA 92562 (951) 698-6300 SpringHill Suites 28220 Jefferson Ave Temecula, CA 92590 Free breakfast Free WiFi Gym/Fitness Center La Quintq Inn & Suites 27330 Jefferson Ave Temecula, CA 92590 951.296.1003 Free breakfast Free WiFi Gym/Fitness Center Extended Stay America 27622 Jefferson Ave Temecula, CA 92590 9Free breakfast Free WiFi Kitchen Quality Inn 27338 Jefferson Ave Temecula, CA 92590 951.296.3788 Free breakfast Free WiFi Holiday Inn Express 27660 Jefferson Ave Temecula, CA 92590 951.699.2444 Free breakfast Free WiFi Gym/Fitness Center
Open Internet Explorer on Help Click About Internet Explorer Confirm that it does not say “64-bit Edition” next to the version of Internet Explorer. If it does say “64-bit Edition”, please reach out to your local IT administrator for help you locate the 32-bit version of Internet Explorer on your computer. Please continue to next page. Add the Siebel URL to your “Trusted Select -- Tools Internet Options Security Tab Trusted Sites Click “Sites” button Please continue to next page.
Paste the URL below in the “Add this website to the zone:” box. Click Add, check the “Require server verification (https:) for all sites in this zone” checkbox, and then Close. Add the Siebel URL to Compatibility View Settings Select --Tools Compatibility View Settings Paste in the “Add this website:” box. Add Make sure the “Display all websites in Compatibility View” checkbox is checked. Click Close Please continue to next page. your computer to Download the Active X Plug-in Click on Tools Internet Options and Choose Trusted Sites Click “Custom Level” button After clicking the “Custom level…” button you will see the screenshot below. Please continue to next page.
neat and visually appealing. Oral Presentation 0 Points Student did not complete an oral presentation 1 Point Student completed his/her presentation but was missing 2 parts. Presentation was creative and little effort was 2 Points Student completed his/her presentation but was missing 1part. Presentation was creative and some effort was shown 3 Points Student completed his/her presentation and included all parts. Presentation was creative and effort was shown Comments: Total points: _______/13pts
through August 31 and after August 31, develop a worksheet to compute the profit from this order. first quarter of the year is the second quarter, April–June; the third quarter, and the fourth quarter, Write a formula that returns (for any given date) the quarter of the year. Hint: to determine the month use the function =MONTH(date). a formula that returns a person's age, given his or her date of birth. file Addresses.xlsx gives people's names on one line, their street address on the next line, and their city, state, and zip code on the following line.
1/31/2015 Customer service, invoicing, and reporting core services Eric Thiegs, SVP 2/20/2015 General edits to document Eric Thiegs, SVP 5/6/2014 Updated links to sample documents Eric Thiegs, SVP 5/7/2015 Addressing on mail pieces tips William Homer, VPO 9/2/2015 New full window envelope Eric Thiegs, SVP 9/24/2015 Clarification on USPS envelope layout Eric Thiegs, SVP 1/16/2018 General Review & Minor Edits William VPO 9/05/2018 Updated Shipping SKU’s (CAN/USA), Marketing, TOC updates. William Homer, VPO 10/31/2018 Updated messaging under Shipping Section William Homer, VPO Overview This document contains details on the physical and technical requirements for National Gift Card Corp.’s (NGC) individual fulfillment process. Any changes to this document will be reviewed with the customer to ensure compatibility to required systems and processes. Please use the checklist as your roadmap for the fulfillment integration steps we’ll be taking together before the first live order file is submitted to us… 1. Number of cards per carrier defined, along with total number of carriers that will be created Card brands and denominations selected Signed agreement Client launch meetings/calls scheduled with each of the departments 2. Accounting Set-up fees paid Financial relationship: Prefund vs. Pay-per-invoice Reporting needs: Basic or Premium 3. Marketing Carrier template(s) created? (Physical gift card fulfillment) Email templates created? (Digital gift card fulfillment through API) Merchant approval(s) secured EPS logo(s) sent
Society of Languages/Spanish Honor Society This is an honor society that has bylaws and requirements for admission to the society membership by qualification French Club For anyone who is interested in French! Open year around Young Life Students will get together, have fun and talk about the Lord. Open year around Spanish Club Focus on culture and countries where spanish is spoken Open year around SkillsUSA SkillsUSA is a partnership of students, teachers and industry representatives ; Open year around Prom Planning We work on planning prom Open year around National Art Honor Society The NAHS is an art honor society. Members use art skills and volunteer hours to complete service jobs in the school and community to promote art awareness membership by qualification Robotics We were how to program robots. Open year around Student Council to serve as a liaison between the student body and the administration. Electioned each year Steppers We promote positive attitudes, leadership, discipline, and trust through our advanced stepping and dance routines. membership through tryouts in September HOSA promotes career opportunities in the health care industry Class enrolment is required Maroon Platoon We promote spirit leadership for athletic events Heidi.kamilar@wylieisd.net Open year around