Value quantitative or Qualitative) Limited public extension services in the RS and none in the FBiH. Few public private extension partnerships Stakeholder managed contracted, public/private extension service reaching 20% of commercial farmers Partially achieved, 40% of the target value. See the details in section 3.2 of the ICR. Date achieved 05/23/2007 06/30/2012 06/30/2016 Comments (incl. % achievement) Although this indicator was dropped, good progress on extension services was achieved in the RS. Indicator 4 : Registries and databases for the effective management of incentive payments, tracking sanitary inspection data at Entity with reporting capacity to State level agencies and MOFTER are in place approximating EU systems Value quantitative or Qualitative) No systematic registry and reporting capacity in place Link various registries for Farm Information System Substantially achieved, about 80% of the target value. See the details in section 3.2 of the ICR. Date achieved 05/23/2007 06/30/2012 06/30/2016 Comments (incl. % achievement) The links at Entity and State level have been established. The outcome was affected by the project inability to establish an agreed payment structure. Indicator 5 : Before restructuring: One hundred of rural development structural payments made through harmonized, EU-IPARD compliant institutions and systems at the level of each Entity quantitative or Qualitative) Un-transparent agricultural and rural development support targeting and administrative procedures. Poor monitoring and impact evaluation Harmonized, EU IPARD compliant rural development structural payments made at the level of each Entity Not achieved. See the details in section 3.2 of the ICR. Date achieved 05/23/2007 06/30/2012 06/30/2016 Comments (incl. % achievement) The indicator was dropped after restructuring in July 2011. Indicator 6 : After restructuring: Flood rehabilitation grants help communities recover to pre-flood level of economic Value quantitative or Qualitative) Some 15% of community assets destroyed Execution of works and goods contracts Fully achieved. See the details in section 3.2 of the ICR. Date achieved 07/12/2011 06/30/2016 06/30/2016 Comments (incl. % achievement) This is a new indicator added after restructuring in July 2011 to measure impact of flood rehabilitation activities. (b) Intermediate Outcome Indicator(s)
Indicator 9 : RS MAFWM/FBiH MAWMF Department for Extension with a multi-stakeholder governing body established Value (quantitative or Qualitative) Limited public extension services in the RS and none in the FBiH Extension Boards manage a contracted, pluralistic extension system The indicator was dropped after restructuring in July 2011 Date achieved 05/23/2007 06/30/2012 06/30/2016 Comments (incl. % achievement) Indicator 10 : Market and results-oriented Entity extension systems operational and effective in accordance with clearly defined policy objectives Value (quantitative or Qualitative) Few public/private extension partnerships On-farm extension delivery primarily through contracted private sector and civil society extension agent The indicator was dropped restructuring in July 2011 Date achieved 05/23/2007 06/30/2012 06/30/2016 Comments (incl. % achievement) Indicator 11 : No of contracted extension/advisory service providers accredited with specific competencies Value (quantitative or Qualitative) 0 100 The indicator was dropped restructuring in July 2011 Date achieved 05/23/2007 06/30/2012 06/30/2016 Comments (incl. % achievement) Indicator 12 : No of extension packages prepared and disseminated Value (quantitative or Qualitative) 0 50 Date achieved 05/23/2007 06/30/2012 06/30/2016 Comments (incl. % achievement) The indicator was dropped after restructuring in July 2011 Indicator 13 : No of commercial and semi-subsistence farmers undergoing restructuring and within target group who implement activities directly related to advisory services extended with Project assistance Value (quantitative or Qualitative) 0 3000 The indicator was dropped after restructuring in July 2011 processors
Date achieved 05/23/2007 06/30/2012 06/30/2016 Comments (incl. % achievement) Indicator 14 : B1: Transparency Entity level paying systems established Value (quantitative or Qualitative) Un-transparent, manual paying system operating 100% of Entity payments made through the accredited paying system Not achieved Date achieved 05/23/2007 06/30/2012 06/30/2016 Comments (incl. % achievement) All IPARD like Rural Development Grants are made through paying system. A software application to handle direct payments remains to be developed. Indicator 15 : B2: Entity level rural development plans established and overseen by Monitoring Committees Value (quantitative or Qualitative) No BIH rural development plan Monitoring Committee reformulating RD program on M&E report Partially achieved, about 50%. Date achieved 05/23/2007 06/30/2012 06/30/2016 Comments (incl. % achievement) See the details in Annex 4 of the ICR. Both entities have developed their respective rural development programs and agricultural strategies. Indicator 16 : B3: Increase in RD funding and number of grants supporting competitive agriculture activities Value (quantitative or Qualitative) Only 10% of agricultural subsidies are structural More than 50% of all payments are structural Partially achieved, about 50% Date achieved 05/23/2007 06/30/2012 06/30/2016 Comments (incl. % achievement) Approximately 25% of agricultural payments are in structural form, for investments. Ratio used to be higher before floods in 2014, but it is expected to recover to 50% over the next couple of years. Indicator 17 : MOFTER RD payment and registries database and reporting system established (quantitative or Qualitative) No central collation or reporting of market or structural payments MOFTER publishes a consolidated report of BiH market and development payments This indicator was dropped restructuring in July 2011 Date achieved 05/23/2007 06/30/2012 06/30/2016 Comments (incl. % achievement) Indicator 18 : B4: Rehabilitation investments completed before end of construction and farming season in October, 2011
Annex 1. Project Costs and Financing (a) Project Cost by Component (in USD Million equivalent) Components Appraisal Estimate (USD millions) Actual/Latest Estimate (USD millions) Percentage of Appraisal Component A: Agriculture information system and institutional capacity building US$9.04 US$5.84 64% Component B: Enhanced agriculture and development incentive programs US$l0.83 US$5.71 53% Component C: Project coordination, administration and monitoring US$1.13 US$1.49 131% Total Project Costs US$21.0 US$13.05 62% (b) Financing Source of Funds Type of Cofinancing Appraisal Estimate (USD millions) Actual/Latest Estimate (USD millions) Percentage of Appraisal Borrower 9.19 0.00 .00 International Development Association (IDA) 21.00 19.40 93% SWEDEN: Swedish Intl. Dev. Cooperation Agency (SIDA) 6.00 5.90 98% Annex 2. Outputs by Component With respect to outputs by component, the following results were achieved by the project: Component A: Agricultural Information and Institutional Capacity Building Intermediate Indicator Target Value Status of achievement A1: Veterinary Office of BiH implementing effective animal identification system 90% of cattle and 70% of and goats are ear tagged achieved. Over 90% of bovines are ear tagged. For sheep, the value reaches >70% in FBiH and 25-30% in RS. The EU-compliant upgraded and expanded animal I&R system operational, software developed, hardware (server) installed and consumables supplied. Data for
provided by each entity. The APPH conducts ad-hoc risk assessment, identifies priorities for enhanced control and instructs Inspectorates accordingly. A4: APPH develops and implements phytosanitary and plant register database Fully achieved. The APPH operates a phyto register database that include plants and producers as well. The link is accessible by entity inspections services and Ministries of Agriculture. A5: FSA implementing a risk based food safety system FSA performs at 3 risk assessments and coordinates a risk communication program Fully achieved. The FSA conducts a risk assessment for aflatoxins and phosphates in food, and commissioned a Total Diet study to assess prevailing nutritional habits and help identify inherent risks. The FSA applies a public information strategy and coordinates a risk communication Working Group. A6: Inspection Directorates are implementing BiH plant health, animal health and food safety laws and regulations All Entity Inspectorate reporting of food, animal and health is Substantially achieved 75%). Both Entity Inspectorates operate web-based databases and share data with state-level agencies. Their IMS systems are not linked. Information is shared on a daily basis through uploads, but not yet in a real-time manner. A7: FBiH MAFWM agricultural information units and databases and FADN pilot established assembling farm level information Partially achieved (about 50%). FADN pilot established in both entities, however regular update of database is not maintained in FBiH once responsibility was handed down to cantons. To date in RS a total of 128 farms are being surveyed on an annual basis. A8: WAN linking MOFTER with State level agencies, entity MOAs, and Inspection services under establishment for AIS Fully achieved. Federal MoA has already established this interface with MOFTER and it has been operations ever since; Launch of web service by AI&R Agency that would be the interface between the Agency itself and entity ministries of agriculture and inspectorates, with the door open to the
Agency’s database to be used by MOFTER, too, although the link has not been reported to be in use by the eligible institutions; register became operational in 2013, with links open to all key stakeholders in the field of plant health, i.e. entity ministries, inspectorates and MOFTER; VPN connection, being an essential part of widely seen WAN has been established for the purpose of F&C data replication from federal MoA to MOFTER server. The same kind of connection was set up with the MAFWM RS, for test purposes, but it never got used in terms originally outlined. Component B: Enhanced Agriculture and Development Support Program Intermediate Indicator Target Value Status of achievement B1: Transparency Entity level paying systems established 100% of RD payment at entity level processed through new paying system Not achieved. All like Rural Development Grants are made through paying system. A software application to handle direct payments remains to be developed. B2: Entity level rural development plans established and overseen by Monitoring Committees Monitoring Committee established providing policy input Partially achieved (about 50%). Both entities have developed their respective rural development programs and agricultural strategies. The new Minister of Agriculture in the FBiH suggested a review and modest changes to the recently produced agricultural strategy to better reflect the priorities for sector development. In the RS, the MAFWM is foreseeing to move more towards area based direct payments in the sector to simplify the payment structure and further foster the emergence of larger more competitive farms. The RS formally established a supervisory board; in FBiH
Annex 4. Revised Results Framework Project Development Objective (PDO): To assist Bosnia and Herzegovina to strengthen the capacity of its State-level and Entity-level institutions to deliver more efficient and effective agricultural services and support programs as well as to make a substantial contribution to an acceleration of Bosnia and Herzegovina’s eligibility to access support under the European Union Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance for Rural Development (IPARD). Revised Project Development Objective: No Change PDO Level Results Indicators* Core N= New R=Revised Unit of Measure Baseline Cumulative Target Values** Data Source/ for Data Collection Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 June 30, 2012 Sixty-percent of disease and pest inspections implemented on the basis of expected risks D Yes/No Poor understanding of pest and disease epidemiology. Little risk based inspection Disease and pest incidence and epidemiology studies initiated Disease and pest survey completed and databases established Risk based disease and pest management control systems operational Sanitary inspection is 60% risk based Indicator One: Structured disease and pest control system, informed by surveys and supported by reliable laboratory diagnostic capacity and databases, are developed, coordinated and implemented with data sharing at State and Entity level approximating EU standards N Yes/No No systematic disease and pest control systems for plants, animals, and foodstuff in place Develop regulatory framework Undertake surveys and laboratory analysis in line with regulations, Develop registries and reporting systems Maintain and monitor situation through inspection services, risk targeting of inspections Annual SVO, APPH, FSA and entity reports SVO, APPH, FSA and entity reports Pluralistic, stakeholder driven and outcome based contracted extension services operational at the level of each entity and benefitting twenty percent of commercial farmers D Yes/No Limited public extension services in the RS and none in the FBiH. Few public private Extension Departments established and staffed Extension agencies and regional offices established. Extension elected. Outcome based, contracted extension Stakeholder managed contracted, public/private extension service reaching 20%
extension partnerships Extension contracting formats finalized and tenders advertised. delivery operational of commercial farmers Un-transparent agricultural and rural development support targeting and administrative procedures. Poor monitoring and impact evaluation. D Yes/No Paying System and Management authority staffed and equipped Farm registries established and used to verify agricultural and rural development payments Paying system hardware and software operational and tested Indicator Two: Registries and databases for the effective management of incentive payments, tracking of sanitary inspection data at Entity levels with reporting capacity to State level agencies and MOFTER are in place approximating EU systems. N Yes/No No systematic registry and reporting capacity in Develop Farm and client registry Develop an Farm and client, and livestock registry Enter new data and update information on continuous basis and data auditing Link various registries for Farm information System Annual SVO and I&R Agency Reports and livestock statistics SVO and I&R Agency Indicator Three: Flood rehabilitation grants help communities recover to level of economic activity. N Yes/No Some 15% of community assets destroyed Assets for replacement adequately recorded and valuated Development of design and technical specifications Execution of and goods contracts All rehabilitation completed PIU and APCU quarterly status reports PIU and APCU INTERMEDIATE RESULTS Intermediate Result (Component One): Agricultural Information and Institutional Capacity Building State sanitary and phytosanitary laws, regulations and inspection systems approximate EU norms. Agricultural information systems support strategic planning, policy making and monitoring. Knowledge and technology available for agricultural producers and processors to raise competitiveness and access and make effective use of the structural support provided by the MAFWM/MAWMF. Revised Intermediate Result (Component One): Agricultural Information and Institutional Capacity Building a) State sanitary and phytosanitary laws, regulations and inspection systems approximate EU norms. b) Agricultural information systems support strategic planning, policy making and monitoring approximating EU requirements.
Regulations Intermediate Result indicator RS FBiH MAWMF agricultural information units and databases and FADN pilot established assembling farm level information. R Yes/No Adhoc record keeping and no M&E for formulation of policy for support programs Develop FADN survey and implement Implement FADN survey for 120 farms Implement FADN survey for 180 farms, establish agricultural information database Integrate FADN survey data in entity MoA information system 6 months progress reports RS AND FBiH MoA Reports to PIU and APCU Intermediate Result indicator WAN linking MOFTER with Sate level agencies, Entity MoAs, and Inspection services under establishment for AIS N Yes/no No coherent agricultural information collection at State level Coordinate development of registries for livestock, clients, health and inspection services Develop and State level WAN strategy with entities Develop Software and hardware requirements and identify server room interface of various entity level and State agency databases for AIS 6 months progress report MOFTER PIU Intermediate Result indicator RS MAFWM/ FBiH MAWMF Department for Extension with a multi-stakeholder governing body established. D Limited public extension services in RS and none in FBiH. RS MAFWM/ FBiH MAWFM Extension Departments. Established. RS MAFWM/ FBiH MAWFM Extension Departments and Agencies trained and operational. Extension Boards elected. Extension Boards manage a contracted, pluralistic extension system Intermediate Result indicator Market and results-oriented Entity extension systems operational and effective in accordance with clearly defined policy objectives. D Few public/private extension partnerships. Extension management system established and contracting systems designed. Initial of 30 extension contracts issues. Contract extension service delivery system fully operational at farm level. On-farm extension delivery primarily through contracted private sector and civil society extension agents. Intermediate Result indicator Number of contracted extension/advisory service providers accredited with specific competencies. D None 30 50 80 Intermediate Result indicator Number of extension packages prepared and disseminated. D None 15 20 30 Intermediate Result indicator Number of commercial and semi-subsistence farmers undergoing restructuring and agro-processors within target D None 300 800 1,500