zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Commitment Tracking Number Accession Number Date Change Notice Description of Change Description of Training Required and Completion Date Comment and Feedback Resolution Accession Number N/A 10/28/11 CN 11-024 Complete rewrite no red line. Enhanced for improved usability. Added preliminary white, yellow, red, and greater than green example cover letter (FF 0612Exh4-1350), Added reference to Enforcement Manual Appendix B for traditional enforcement examples (FF 0612Exh4-1452). Revised wording for disputing cross cutting aspects. Added references to MD 3.57 and the ADAMS Desk Reference Guide. Revised Reactive, Supplemental (Added wording to cover letter related to holding open or closing a performance issue in the Action Matrix.), and Problem Identification and Resolution portions of the cover letters. Revised Security cover letters to remove reference to type of supplemental and reactive inspections performed (FF 0612Exh4-1452) and to address template problems (FF 0612Exh4-1551). No N/A N/A 07/10/12 CN 12-014 Updated Security Inspection Report Cover Letter Template to remove redundant wording (FF 0612Exh4-1732). No N/A N/A 09/13/13 CN 13-021 Incorporated plain writing enhancements and revised supplemental inspection template to include a more complete chronology of the performance issue and Action Matrix response. No N/A ML13255A118
Commitment Tracking Number Accession Number Issue Date Change Notice Description of Change Description of Training Required and Completion Date Comment and Feedback Resolution Accession Number N/A ML13337A583 07/26/16 CN 16-018 Added apparent violation wording to pending significance section. Revised problem identification and resolution section. Revised 2.390 wording for plain writing and terminology changes. Made additional changes to enhance plain writing. Added wording to supplemental inspection section for issuing an interim report when inspection objectives are not met. Revised to support prompt information collection in support SDP streamlining. Revised cross-cutting aspect wording in security cover letter to correct introduced error. Approved Versions: ROP Inspection Report Cover Letter, Version 9 ROP Security Inspection Report Cover Letter, Version 10 No N/A ML16203A023 1937, ML14024A145 1938 ML14024A186
ML13058A316 05/06/16 CN 16-012 Clarified licensee-identified, self-revealed, and NRC identified definitions. Added “failed on demand testing” to self-revealed examples. Added direction on how to document multiple examples of the same finding. a requirement to document when the violation occurred and how long it existed for Section 4OA7 NCVs. Clarified definition of performance deficiency (application or meaning not changed see IMC 0308 Att 3 for Aligned finding summary and 4 part write-up requirements to eliminate inconsistencies. Specified existing requirement to document performance deficiency screening when documenting a TE violation without a finding. Removed replicative cover letter directions already included in IMC 0612 Exhibit 4. Enhanced direction for amending inspection reports. direction for retaining proprietary information. Added direction not to communicate regulatory determinations or actions that have not been established in accordance with applicable processes. Removed requirement to list more than six documents reviewed in a sample in the report attachment. None Closed FF: 1555, 1684, 1900, 1917, 1954, & 2152 April 2015 DDCM Action Items 25 & 26 N/A ML17122A246 05/03/17 CN 17-009 Created IMC 0611 to separate power reactor inspection reports from issue screening. No other changes were made to IMC 0612. None n/a
G: APPOINTMENT OF ADJUDICATOR [How the appointment was made, ie. whether by agreement or by the Director of the KLRCA, when the adjudicator accepted the appointment, etc] H: ISSUES [Set out the issues requiring the determination of the adjudicator, e.g. relating to liability and quantum of the claim] I: ADJUDICATION CLAIM [Set out the details of the adjudication e.g. nature and description of the claim, the basis for the claim, the relief(s) / remedy(ies) sought in the adjudication claim, and identify briefly the documents / evidence relied on by the Claimant] I: ADJUDICATION RESPONSE [Set out the details of the adjudication response, e.g. the Respondent’s answer to the adjudication claim, the grounds advanced by the Respondent, and identify briefly the documents / evidence relied on by the Respondent] J: ADJUDICATION REPLY (if any) [Set out the answer by the Claimant to the Adjudication Response, and identify briefly any further documents / evidence produced by the Claimant] K: HEARING / MEETING / SITE VISIT [Set out the number of days of hearing / meeting, and the evidence taken during the hearing or meeting, the date of the site visit, any other action taken by the adjudicator etc.] L: FINDINGS AND REASONS [Discuss each issue by providing his findings and reasons for his findings.] M: COSTS & ADJUDICATOR’S FEES AND EXPENSES [Discuss as to who shall bear the costs, and fix the quantum of costs to be paid. Set out the amount of adjudicator’s fees and expenses payable, and the details thereof] N: DETERMINATION [Set out the decision of the adjudicator] e.g. Example 1: Where claim or cross-claim is successful [State the adjudicated amount (if any), the paying party, and the party entitled to receive payment from the paying party, and the time within which the adjudicated amount is to be paid];
FINANCIAL BID INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANT FOR ROUTINE IMMUNIZATION - SUPPORTIVE SUPERVISION Tasks Deliverable (s) UNICEF Estimate TO BE FILLED IN BY CONSULTANT Estimated deadline for completion of deliverable (please mention as days/months) Estimated travel required for completion of deliverable (please mention destination/ number of days) Cost (INR) (All inclusive monthly professional fee) * The consultant will coordinate with the state to find the feasible supportive supervision model which is contextually implementable with consultation with state UNICEF offices. Finalizing the supportive supervision dashboard in GAVI states (Medical colleges, external agencies, etc.) Detailed description of the plan 25.09.2015 Estimated travel of 10 days per month Detailed of supportive supervision and the processes and checklists to be finalized. Monitoring visits to the states for the quality of supportive supervision. Trip Reports providing feedback of monitoring visits Monthly Collect, collate and structure the reports in a presentable manner to the MOHFW. Monthly collection collation and reporting of Supportive supervision data to UNICEF and and states Monthly Regular analysis of the Quarterly presentation Monthly
supportive supervision data in to get deep insights into the programme and formulate the strategies, which enable to reach high quality with equity. and report on data to IAG,ICO and reporting to GAVI Assist the UNICEF and MOHFW in providing support to stewardship of the immunization programme of the country. Annual report to GAVI and lessons learned and success stories Annually Collect, collate and present quarterly reports to Immunization action group and submit report to GAVI quarterly and annually. Quarterly presentation and report on data to IAG,ICO and reporting to GAVI Quarterly TOTAL FOR 22 MONTHS Shaded area to be filled in by consultant Name of the Bidder: Address: Contact no.: Email address: Date: (*) NOTES: Please quote Professional fee on a monthly basis; payment will be linked to submission of Monthly/quarterly/annual reports (deliverables indicated above) Travel expenses will be reimbursed on actuals and on a pre-approved travel plan. Per Diem/DSA will be reimbursed at UNICEF’s Consultant’s
programs (NRCs) 18. Review meeting to improve post discharge on the assessment) conducted and report submitted 19. Certified field visits to assess the and report submitted to UNICEF 20. End of assignment report submitted 30 Sep 2016 28Feb 2017 10 Jun 2017 30 dists 30 dists 5 5 2500/- 2500/- Provide technical assistance for creation of a Center of Excellence on SAM at Sishu Bhawan, Cuttack 21. Rapid assessment protocols developed and submitted to UNICEF 22. Capacity building of the CoE functionaries and deptt heads on facility based SAM and monitoring checklists conducted 20 Jul 2016 10 Dec 2016 Provide technical support introduction of the Facility Based SAM in Nursing and Medical Pre-Service curriculum 10. One assessment report on visit to the Nursing colleges) on the quality of teaching on SAM by faculties submitted to UNICEF/ DON 23. A sensitization of senior officials of health deptt and the DMET/ Deans of various Medical Colleges organized 30 Sep 2016 30 Sep 2016 30 dists 10 2500/-
6. Describe how vendors receive the card number to process payment. If an email is sent, please provide an example of the correspondence sent. 7. Do you offer a Buyer Initiated Payment (push pay) Program? If so, please provide an explanation of how this service would operate. Does a different rebate schedule apply? 8. Identify how authorization limits are determined or changed. 9. If the supplier reverses a payment, identify the impact on the available balance for the card. 10. Who retains ownership of the vendor payment information (i.e. contact person, address, phone number)? 11. Vendor Program Administration a. Discuss your approach in recruiting vendors on the City’s behalf to your firm’s purchasing card platform. Include in your discussion the approach to analysis of City data, supplier outreach, and discussion of solutions and their associated benefits, etc. Disclose if there are additional software tools required. b. What are the steps for signing up a vendor? c. Identify the number of vendors your institution currently has enrolled. d. If a vendor is already enrolled with your electronic payable platform, describe the process for the City to pay that vendor electronically. e. Who makes outbound phone calls to vendors (i.e. employees of your firm or a third party)? f. How many professionals are on the vendor outreach teams? g. For individuals, what percentage of their time is dedicated to vendor outreach calls or activities? h. Will a specific individual or a team of individuals be assigned to the City? i. Is the vendor outreach team empowered to sign up the vendor or is it handed off to another department? j. How quickly do you anticipate reaching out the City’s vendors? How many vendors do you plan to reach out to in 3 months? In 6 months?
9. Do I need the licensees, vendor’s, or applicant’s permission to keep these photographs? You do not need the licensees, vendor’s, or applicant’s permission to retain these photographs for training purposes if you believe these photographs would be helpful in carrying out NRCs regulatory responsibilities. Requests by the licensee, vendor, or applicant to review photographs for classified, safeguards, or SUNSI (personal privacy or proprietary information) information should normally be honored to ensure proper classification. NRC authority the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 10. Are training photographs subject to FOIA? Yes. MD 3.1, Freedom of Information Act 11. How should the photographs be identified? Photographs that contain proprietary information must be labeled as such in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b) and should include the date and name of the facility or facility Photographs should be documented and classified as they are produced. 10 CFR 2.390 36 CFR 1237.28(h). USING PHOTOS FOR INFORMAL TRAINING QUESTION ANSWER SOURCE 12. If the photographs contain classified and safeguards information can they still be used for training purposes? Yes, but only if absolutely necessary and only if the photographs support an inspection finding (REMINDER, Staff reviewing such photographs must possess the appropriate clearance levels and have a need to know). If this is the case, such photographs and or digital cameras that contain classified and safeguards information must be secured and agency guidance followed. Follow guidance in IMC 0620 regarding licensee, vendor, or applicant review of such photographs. IMC 0620, “Inspection Documents and Records” MD 12.1, NRC Facility Security Plan MD 12.2, NRC Classified Information Security Program
Attachment 1 – Revision History for IMC 0620 Commitment Tracking Number Issue Date Description of Change Training Required Training Completion Date Comment Resolution Accession Number N/A 07/08/96 Revised to ensure compliance with the National Archive and Records Administration (NARA) regulations relating to the creation and retention of federal agency records. No N/A N/A 01/27/06 Completed 4year review for commitments. Eliminated the requirement to list all documents reviewed as an attachment to the inspection report and the requirement to place all documents reviewed in ADAMS. Updated and added security documents that contain classified information. Added guidance on the use of e-mail during the inspection process. No N/A N/A 05/15/09 Added amplifying information on written requests for information, updated definitions and references. No N/A
Reflective Supervision Guidelines APPLICANT OR ENDORSED PROFESSIONAL EARNING Endorsement RENEWING Endorsement RENEWAL REQUIREMENT PROVIDER OF REFLECTIVE SUPERVISION/CONSULTATION PROVIDER OF REFLECTIVE SUPERVISION/CONSULTATION Infant Family Specialist (Level II) Bachelor’s degree Level II Master’s prepared or Level III or Level IV-Clinical Min. 24 clock hours Level II Master’s prepared or Level III or Level IV-Clinical Min. 12 clock hours Annually Ongoing Infant Family Specialist (Level II) Master’s degree III or Level IV-Clinical Min. 24 hours Level III or Level IV-Clinical Min. 12 clock hours Annually Ongoing Infant Mental Health Specialist (Level III) Direct Service Provider Level III or Level IV-Clinical Min. 50 clock hours Level III or Level IV-Clinical Min. 12 clock hours Annually Ongoing Infant Mental Health Specialist (Level III) Provider of Reflective Supervision to Others Level III or Level IV-Clinical Min. 50 clock hours IV-Clinical Min. 12 clock hours Annually Ongoing Infant Mental Health Mentor – Clinical (Level IV) Level IV-Clinical Min. 50 clock hours Level IV-Clinical Min. 12 clock hours Ends after having earned & maintained Level IV-Clinical for 3 years Please Note: Peer supervision (defined as colleagues meeting together without an identified supervisor/consultant to guide the reflective process), while valuable for many experienced practitioners, does not meet the reflective supervision/consultation criteria for endorsement even if one of the peers has earned endorsement at Level III or Level IV-Clinical.
General Proficiency Individual Study Activity (ISA-General-4) Safety Culture PURPOSE: This activity will provide you with a working knowledge of the NRC safety culture initiative and how it is addressed in the Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) and Construction Reactor Oversight Process (cROP). COMPETENCY AREA: INSPECTION LEVEL OF EFFORT: 20 hours REFERENCES: For power reactor inspectors: Safety Culture ROP Training and the Review of the Columbia Space Shuttle Accident computer-based training found in iLearn. Inspection Manual Chapters 0305, “Operating Reactor Assessment Program,” 0310, “Aspects Within the Cross-Cutting Areas,” and 0612, “Power Reactor Inspection Reports” IPs 40100, “Independent Safety Culture Assessment Follow-up”, 71152, “Problem Identification and Resolution”; 95001, “Supplemental Inspection for One or Two White Inputs in a Strategic Performance Area”; 95002, “Supplemental Inspection Procedure for One Degraded Cornerstone or Any Three White Inputs in a Strategic Performance Area”; 95003, “Supplemental Inspection Procedure Repetitive Degraded Cornerstone or Multiple Degraded Cornerstones, Multiple Yellow Inputs, or One Red Input”; 71153, “Event Follow-up”; 93800, “Augmented Inspection Team”; and 93812, “Special Inspection” SECY-06-122, “Safety Culture Initiative Activities to Enhance the Reactor Oversight Process and Outcomes of the Initiatives” at (ADAMS Accession No. ML061320282) Safety Culture Policy Statement and Federal Register Notice (ML11146A047) Safety Culture Case Study User Guide () and Educational Material ()
Commitment Tracking Number Accession Number Issue Date Change Notice Description of Change Description of Training Required and Completion Date Comment and Feedback Resolution Accession Number (Pre-Decisional, Non-Public) N/A 01/10/08 CN 08-001 Updated a reference in ISA-General-1. None ML073510727 N/A 07/08/09 CN 09-017 Updated references and increased flexibility of course prerequisites, by recommending, vice requiring, completion of Appendix A before taking G-105, G-205, and G-103 training. None ML091590710 N/A 12/29/11 CN 11-044 ML11168A201 This revision updates safety culture training and moves online courses into iLearn to correct hyperlinks and simplify record retention. None ML11322A091 N/A ML15177A298 01/13/16 Cn 16-002 This revision incorporates the qualification of construction inspectors (IMC 1252), and updates references, required courses, IMC format, and safety culture training. None ML15195A147 Closed FF: 1245B-1902 ML13207A186 1245B-2031 ML14149A264 1245B-2107 ML15009A305 1245B-2125 ML14099A006 N/A ML16049A279 02/24/16 CN 16-008 This revision updates the link to safety culture training in ISA-3 and 4. None N/A
Commitment Tracking Number Accession Number Issue Date Change Notice Description of Change Description of Training Required and Completion Date Comment and Feedback Resolution Accession Number (Pre-Decisional, Non-Public) N/A ML16301A162 12/19/16 CN 16-034 This revision adds INPO videos to expand the number of technical issues addressed in ISA-3 and updates OJT-1 (emergency drills). None ML16301A339 Closed FF: 1245B-2030 ML16049A417 1245B-2199 ML16166A010
Revision History Sheet for IMC 1245 Appendix C-2 Attachment 1 Commitment Tracking Number Accession Number Issue Date Change Notice Description of Change Description of Training Required and Completion Date Comment and Feedback Resolution Accession Number N/A 10/31/06 CN 06-032 To update reference lists and incorporate minor editorial changes. Completed 4 year historical CN search None N/A N/A 01/10/08 CN 08-001 To add G-204 as a post qualification training requirement and to update ISA-ENG-1 and OJT-ENG-1 to reflect the new Component Design Bases Inspection Approach None ML073510727 N/A 07/08/09 CN 09-017 Updates ISA-ENG-3 and ISA-ENG-5, and moves and refresher training requirements into Appendix Specifically, ISA-ENG-3 is updated to remove the task to take Web-based 50.59 training that is no longer available on the Web. ISA-ENG-5 is updated to reference the current location of the SDP initial screening criteria. None ML091590710 N/A 12/29/11 CN 11-044 ML11175A324 This revision adds ISA-6 on the Maintenance Rule, adds training on the OpE gateway and OpE smart samples to OJT-1, and adds key radiation protection terms to OJT-5. None ML11326A208 N/A ML12251A050 12/19/12 CN 12-029 This revision updates training on the SDP in ISA-5 to reflect recent changes to IMC 0609, “Significance Determination Process.” Specifically, references to the At-Power SDP (0609, Appendix A) Phase 1, 2, and 3 were replaced and references and scenarios were updated. None ML12290A180
Table 3.1b: List of work packages Work package No Work Package Title Lead Participant No Lead Participant Name Month End month Total months Table 3.1c: List of Deliverables Deliverable (number) Deliverable name Work package number Short name of lead participant Type Dissemination level Delivery date KEY Deliverable numbers in of delivery dates. Please use the numbering convention <WP number>.<number of deliverable within that WP>. For example, deliverable 4.2 would be the second deliverable from work package 4. Type: Months
Number/size and type Comments / Resource location and identifier, future maintenance Provide unique identifier, DOI or data citation Databases size Data citation including Data model description, data quality description, interoperability through format and content standards, New data collection # of studies with new data collection Data Citation Harmonization of existing data from multiple sources (pooling) # of data fields reviewed and harmonized Data Citation Linking different databases (linked data) number of data & information sources linked Data Citation Software applications # deployed /# releases / #newly developed Please specify internal / public. Validated, Data Citation Mathematical/Statistical Model Repositories for reuse # of models curated and loaded Data Citation Other (specify) Implementation of Standards Number/size and type Comments / Resource location and identifier, future maintenance Provide unique identifier, DOI or data citation Data Format and Content Standards and Vocabularies (including ontologies) adopted/adapted or developed; references Data Citation; In collaboration with a standards development organisation (eg CDISC) Yes/NO Have the standards and vocabularies been cited in project publications? Yes/no Standard Operating Procedures # developed; application area Data Citation; Are the procedures Findable/ Accessible / Reusable)? Other (specify) Education and Training Programme outputs Number Comments Courses conducted Training type, face to face or e-course, masters, stand alone, etc Trainees who completed continuous professional development training programs Trainee type; EFPIA, academia, regulators, patients Students graduated from different training programmes Trainee type; EFPIA, academia, regulators, patients Teachers involved in the training programmes Trainee type; EFPIA, academia, regulators, patients Training centres labelled “excellence” Countries covered by training centres List countries Other (specify) Business related outputs Number Comments Implementation of project results in industry Brief description
RESPONSIBILITIES Implementation Corporate Support Services Compliance Business Unit Monitoring and Evaluation Corporate Support Services Development and/or Review Corporate Support Services Interpretation and Advice Corporate Support Services WHO NEEDS TO KNOW THIS PROCEDURE All TAO Department of Justice Human Resources staff EFFECTIVENESS OF THIS PROCEDURE Minimal complaints from staff in relation management of excess hours. PROCEDURE HISTORY Procedure No. SOP 4.0 - T Approved / Rescinded Approved Date 25/05/2016 Chief Operating Officer Ric De Santi Signature Date of Review 30/06/2019 Amendment Required Yes/No Name of Policy Maker Title Signature
“Analysis of Core Damage Frequency: Internal Events Methodology Vol 1 NUREG/CR-5500 “System Reliability Studies” in 11 volumes: Vol 1 AFW; 1987 - 1995; Vol 2 Westinghouse RPS; 1984 - 1995; INEEL/EXT-97-00740 Vol 3 GE RPS; 1984 - 1995 Vol 4 HPCI; 1987 - 1993; INEEL 94/0158 Vol 5 EDG; 1987 -1993; INEEL 95/0035 Vol 6 Isolation Condenser; 1987 - 1993; INEEL 95/0478 Vol 7 RCIC; 1987 - 1993; 95/0196 Vol 8 HPCS; 1987 - 1993; INEEL 95/00133 Vol 9 HPSI; 1987 - 1997; INEEL 99/00373 Vol 10 CE RPS; 1984 - 1998; INEL/EXT Vol 11 B&W RPS; 1984 -1998; INEL/EXT-97-00740 NUREG/CR-5750 “Rates of Initiating Events at U.S. Nuclear Power Plants: 1987-1995" NUREG/CR-6141 “Handbook of Methods for Risk Based Analyses of Technical Specifications” NUREG-6265 “Multidisciplinary Framework for HRS with an Application of Errors of Commission and Dependencies” NUREG/CR-6544 “A Methodology for Analyzing Precursors to Earthquake - Initiated and Fire-Initiated Accident Sequences” NUREG/CR 6595 “An Approach for Estimating the Frequencies of Various Containment Failure Modes and Bypass Events” NUREG/CR-6823 “Handbook of Parameter Estimation (HOPE) for Probabilistic Risk Assessment” NRC Information Notices IN 2000-13 “Review of Refueling Outage Risks” Documents EPRI TR-105396 “PSA Application Guide” National Research Council - “Understanding Risk-Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society” SRA Individual Study Activity TOPIC: (ISA-SRA-B) Review of PRA Principles and NRC Approach to and Performance-Based Regulation PURPOSE: SRAs must understand the risk terminologies and philosophies used by the NRC in the conduct of its regulatory activities. It is essential that an SRA be conversant with the common of risk communication and have
Revision History Sheet for IMC 1245, Appendix D-1 Attachment 1 Commitment Tracking Number Accession Number Issue Date Change Notice Description of Change Description of Training Required and Completion Date Comment and Feedback Resolution Accession Number Non-Public) C-1 Reference: Davis-Besse Lessons Learned Task Force, Recommendation 3.3.4.6 6/29/04 Adds a requirement for inspectors to take annual refresher training on ROP. None N/A C-2 Reference: OIG-05-A-06 Recommendation 7 (ML052520204) 9/02/05 Adds a requirement that operations inspectors take the appropriate vendor-specific training within 2 years of assignment to a new reactor type. None N/A N/A 07/08/09 CN-09 017 Updates inspector titles, adds two new training standards (C-7 and C-11), and consolidates post-qualification and refresher training requirements needed to maintain full inspector qualification for each inspector type. None N/A N/A ML11073A004 12/29/11 CN-11-044 This revision clarifies refresher training requirements, moves refresher training guidance from IMC 1245 into Appendix D-1, broadens the scope of deviations to include late completion of post-qualification training, adds training for vendor inspectors, and authorizes the supervisor (with concurrent IOLB/NRR approval) to approve alternate refresher training for Health Physics inspectors. None ML11321A232
PURPOSE: The purpose of this activity is to inform you of the regulatory requirements and NRC guidance related to radiation protection applicable to the loading and storage of ISFSI casks. COMPETENCY AREA: INSPECTION LEVEL OF hours REFERENCES: 1. 10 CFR 72.104, “Criteria for Radioactive Materials in Effluents and Direct Radiation from an ISFSI or MRS” 10 CFR 72.106, “Controlled Area of an ISFSI or MRS” SFST-ISG-13, “Real Individual” SFST-ISG-14, “Supplemental Shielding” RG 8.29, “Instruction Concerning Risks from Occupational Radiation Exposure” IN 90-33, “Sources of Unexpected Occupational Radiation Exposures at Spent Fuel Storage Pools” Licensee as low as is reasonably achievable plan (if available) EVALUATION CRITERIA: At the completion of this activity, you should be able to do the following: Understand the storage radiation protection regulatory requirements. Understand and identify the safety-significant canister loading steps that may pose elevated radiation levels to plant workers. TASKS: 1. Review a licensee’s ISFSI loading ALARA plan to evaluate elevated radiation levels during critical ISFSI loading steps. Review requirements for ISFSI storage radiation levels. Observe at least one ISFSI loading activity including the radiation protection staff’s actions to maintain ALARA principles.
EFFORT: Note: The objective of this activity is to make sure that you have experienced the full range of inspection activities. The time needed to complete the tasks will depend on your proficiency. REFERENCES: 1. IP 60853, “On-Site Fabrication of Components and Construction of an ISFSI” 2. IP 60854/60854.1, “Preoperational Testing of an ISFSI” 3. IP 60855/60855.1, “Operation of an ISFSI” 4. IP 60856/60856.1, “Review of 10 CFR 72.212(b) Evaluations” 5. IP 60857, “Review of 10 CFR 72.48 Evaluations” 6. IP “Away-From-Reactor ISFSI Inspection Guidance” 7. IMC 2690, “Inspection Programs for Dry Cask Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel at ISFSIs” EVALUATION CRITERIA: Upon completion of this activity, you should be able to do the following: Understand the baseline inspection process. Describe the contents and purpose of the site-specific inspection plan. Describe the purpose of the inspection planning call. Develop a specific inspection plan and provide it to your immediate supervisor. Describe the purpose and contents of a specific inspection plan. Discuss the documents to be reviewed, including their content and purpose, before an inspection. Describe the activities accomplished by the staff during the inspection(s) and their purpose. entrance meeting management briefing and exit prebriefing of licensee management exit meeting
violation due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect $1,000 per violation, with an annual maximum of $100,000 for repeat violations $50,000 per violation, with an annual maximum of $1.5 million HIPAA violation due to willful neglect but violation is corrected within the required time period $10,000 per violation, with an annual maximum of $250,000 for repeat violations $50,000 per violation, with an annual maximum of $1.5 million HIPAA violation is due to willful neglect and is not corrected $50,000 per violation, with an annual maximum of $1.5 million $50,000 per violation, with an annual maximum of $1.5 million Criminal Penalties In June 2005, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) clarified who can be held criminally liable HIPAA. Covered entities and specified individuals, as explained below, whom "knowingly" obtain or disclose individually identifiable health information in violation of the Administrative Simplification Regulations face a fine of up to $50,000, as well as imprisonment up to one year. Offenses committed under false pretenses allow penalties to be increased to a $100,000 fine, with up to five years in prison. Finally, offenses committed with the intent to sell, transfer, or use individually identifiable health information for commercial advantage, personal gain or malicious harm permit fines of $250,000, and imprisonment for up to ten years. Covered Entity and Specified Individuals The DOJ concluded that the criminal penalties for a violation of are directly applicable to covered entities—including health plans, health care clearinghouses, health care providers who transmit claims in electronic form, and Medicare prescription drug card sponsors. Individuals such as directors, employees, or officers of the covered entity, where the covered entity is not an individual, may also be directly criminally liable under HIPAA in accordance with principles of "corporate criminal liability." Where an individual of a covered entity is not directly liable under HIPAA, they can still be charged with conspiracy or aiding and abetting. “Knowingly” The DOJ interpreted the "knowingly" element of the HIPAA statute for criminal liability as requiring only knowledge of the actions that constitute an offense. Specific knowledge of an action being in violation of the HIPAA statute is not required. ABUSED AND NEGLECTED CHILD REPORTING ACT (325 ILCS 5/) Section 11
Auto-Alert Notifications Sent to Staff Contact Text/ E-mail Auto-Alert Notifications Sent to Staff Contact Text/ E-mail For Devices with Auto-Alerts: Outline or attach the practice’s protocol for responding to temperature excursions after the practice is closed. Consider implementing a phone tree. Ensure staff safety is addressed (e.g., for alerts after dark). Section 2: Equipment Documentation (Continued) DIGITAL DATA LOGGERS/MAINTENANCE Calibration Company/Laboratory Contact Phone Calibration Company/Laboratory Contact Location of Certificates of Calibration
General Proficiency Individual Study Guide TOPIC: (SG-General-1) Quality Assurance Program PURPOSE: This activity will provide you with a working knowledge of the contents of quality assurance (QA) programs and program requirements at fuel facilities and will provide you with general knowledge of the contents of Appendix B of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 50 (10 CFR 50), “Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants and Fuel Reprocessing Plants,” to 10 CFR Part 50, “Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities,” industry standards, and the associated licensee programs and documents that collectively establish the basis for the licensee’s QA program. COMPETENCY AREAS: INSPECTION REGULATORY FRAMEWORK OF EFFORT: 12 hours REFERENCES: 10 CFR 70.64(a)(1), “Quality Standards and Records” 10 CFR 70.62(d), “Management Measures” NUREG-1520, “Standard Review Plan for the Review of a License Application for a Fuel Cycle Facility,” Sections 2, and 11 ASME NQA-1-2004, “Quality Assurance Requirements for Nuclear Facility Applications” Licensee QA program documentation Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 Regulatory Guide 1.33, “Quality Assurance Program Requirements” (ML003739995) EVALUATION CRITERIA: At the completion of this guide, you should be able to do the following: Discuss the content of 10 CFR 70, Subpart H and elements related to management measures. Describe the relationship between the plant license, the license application, the safety evaluation report (where applicable), the plant
Attachment 1 Revision History for IMC 1247 Appendix B Commitment Tracking Number Accession Number Date Change Notice Description of Change Description of Training Required and Completion Date Comment and Feedback Resolution Accession Number 02/18/09 CN 09-006 Researched commitments for 4 years and found none. New inspection manual chapter to specify qualification requirements for NRC fuel facility operations, health physics, emergency preparedness, security, material control and accounting, and construction inspectors. N/A ML090400527 N/A ML12257A123 06/11/14 CN 14-012 This appendix has been revised to update required training and study guides for staff getting qualified as a Fuel Facility inspector. None ML12257A123
Events of Immaculata PERFORMING ARTS Description 1 Yin meets Yang Fashion Show Collaboration of two opposite themes 2 Jukebox vs MP3 Band Fusion of an old and a new song. 3 Battle of the voices Faceoff (one participant of VTS with another participant of another school will sing one song, alternate versus) song will be given at CL meeting 4 LOL Stand up comedy Participants have to make the audience with appropriate jokes (similar to ‘Comedy with Kapil) 5 Collision course Group Dance with face-off Two different dance styles in one dance (eg: Salsa & hip hop) For face off: Hip hop / Street Fine arts Description 1 Happily ever after 4 sub events: 1. Ship building (3D) 2. Fight to the finish 3. whater wonderland 4. jewelery designing To a ship which is high tech and revolutionary Make a 3 D weapon to fight (2feet long) Create an undersea world for a ‘waterbabe’ (mermaid) Design jewellery for the ‘waterbabe’ 2 wrapperdoodle Creative way to gift wrap Will have to design wrapping papers and wrap a few in a unique manner 3 Enchanted Cronicles Build up a life story of your favourite movie or story character (eg. Harry potter) make a trail of where he was born, and other important milestones 4. Spoofy doo Come up with a spoof of a story Eg. Witches, vampires etc 5. Good evil times Eg. Cindrella is good , step mother is evil Two students have to create the good and evil in a creative way 6. Food fantasia Create a edible scene or character from any movie or story Eg. Cinderalla leaving her shoe behind
’All God’s children’ Our Ref:DS/lc 5 January 2015 Dear Headteacher Re: Admission Policy The Governors of Immanuel College would like to give notice of changes to its Admission Policy for the academic year 2016-2017. Full details of the proposed policy can be found attached to this email and on the school website at: If a hard copy is required, please contact Katherine Cocksedge at the school’s address below. The consultation period begins on January 5th 2015 and closes on March 1st 2015. Any comments or queries should be sent by March 2nd to the Revd Stuart Hacking at or by post to the school at the address below. Yours sincerely Chair of Governors
NAME TYPE OF GOVERNOR APPOINTED TERM OF OFFICE COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP SPECIAL ROLES OR CHAIRING RESPONSIBILITIES OTHER EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS AT WHICH A GOVERNOR BUSINESS INTERESTS AND DATE NOTIFIED RELATIONSHIP TO ANY MEMBER OF THE SCHOOL STAFF MEETING ATTENDANCE OVER THE PREVIOUS ACADEMIC YEAR Larisa Barker Parent Parents 10/02/2016 09/02/2020 ASQP FGB 2/3 Sally Chance Co-Opted Governing Body 01/02/2016 31/01/2020 ASQP SPC FGB 1/3 ASQP 1/2 SPC 1/2 Robert Griffiths BDAT Academy Governor BDAT 01/02/2016 31/01/2020 L&M SPC SMC P* FGB 3/3 L&M 2/3 SPC 1/2 Found 1/1 Stuart Hacking BDAT Academy Governor BDAT 01/02/2016 31/01/2020 L&M SPC SMC Member of staff via Diocese of Leeds 15/08/17 FGB 3/3 L&M 3/3 SPC 1/2 Found 1/1 Shuna Hartley BDAT Academy Governor BDAT 01/02/2016 31/01/2020 L&M ASQP C* SMC None None 26/09/2017 None FGB 3/3 L&M 3/3 ASQP C* 2/2 Found 0/1 Annemarie Malcolm BDAT Academy Governor BDAT 01/02/2016 31/01/2020 L&M SPC SMC FGB 3/3 L&M 0/3 SPC C*1/2 Found 1/1
NAME TYPE OF GOVERNOR APPOINTED TERM OF OFFICE COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP SPECIAL ROLES OR CHAIRING RESPONSIBILITIES OTHER EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS AT WHICH A GOVERNOR BUSINESS INTERESTS AND DATE NOTIFIED RELATIONSHIP TO ANY MEMBER OF THE SCHOOL STAFF MEETING ATTENDANCE OVER THE PREVIOUS ACADEMIC YEAR Paul Ratcliffe Parent Parents 10/02/2016 09/02/2020 SPC FGB 3/3 Dale Smith Co-Opted Governing Body 01/02/2016 31/01/2020 L&M FGB 2/3 L&M 1/3 Denise Sterling BDAT Academy Governor BDAT 01/02/2016 31/01/2020 L&M C* ASQP SMC C* FGB C* 3/3 L&M C* 3/3 ASQP 2/2 Found C* 1/1 Gill Taylor BDAT Academy Governor BDAT 10/02/2016 09/02/2020 SPC SMC None None 25/09/2017 None FGB 3/3 Joanne Taylor Staff Staff 01/02/2016 31/01/2020 SPC Member of staff FGB 0/3 SPC 2/2 Jane Tiller Headteacher Ex Officio 01/09/05 Ex Officio L&M Headteacher FGB 3/3 L&M 2/3 Vickerman Governing Body 01/02/2016 31/01/2020 L&M ASQP SMC None None 26/09/2017 None FGB 3/3 ASQP 1/2 SPC 2/2 John Watts BDAT Academy Governor BDAT 10/02/2016 09/02/2020 L&M ASQP SMC BDAT Laisterdyke IEB FGB V* 2/3 L&M V* 2/3 ASQP 2/2 0/1 Bill Henry Associate Member Governors 01/09/2013 31/08/2017 L&M FGB 3/3 L&M 1/3 NAME TYPE OF GOVERNOR APPOINTED TERM OF OFFICE COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP SPECIAL ROLES OR CHAIRING RESPONSIBILITIES OTHER EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS BUSINESS INTERESTS AND DATE NOTIFIED RELATIONSHIP TO ANY MEMBER OF MEETING ATTENDANCE OVER THE
AT WHICH A GOVERNOR THE SCHOOL STAFF PREVIOUS ACADEMIC YEAR Dawn Peacock BDAT Academy Governor BDAT 01/02/2016 31/01/2020 SPC Found FGB 2/3 SPC 2/2 Found 0/1 C* denotes Chair of Committee and V* denotes Vice-Chair *P denotes Chair of the PDC when it meets. L&M - Leadership and Management ASQP – Achievement, Standards and Quality of Provision SPC – Students Pastoral Care, incorporating the PDC (Pupil Discipline Committee) SMC – SIAMS Monitoring Committee (formerly called Foundation Governors)
Fuel Facility Nuclear Criticality Safety Inspector On-the-Job Activity (OJT-NCS-1) Criticality Safety Inspections PURPOSE: The purpose of this activity is to familiarize you with the proper method for inspecting criticality safety documents and organizations. COMPETENCY AREA: INSPECTION REGULATORY FRAMEWORK LEVEL OF EFFORT: 128 hours REFERENCES: 1. IP 88003, “Reactive Inspection for Events at Fuel Cycle Facilities Program.” 2. IP 88015, “Nuclear Criticality Safety Program.” 3. IP 88016, “Nuclear Criticality Safety Evaluations and Analyses.” IP “Criticality Safety Alarms.” IP “Operational Safety.” IP 88025, “Maintenance and Surveillance of Safety Controls.” IP 88070, “Permanent Plant Modifications.” IP “Configuration Management Programmatic Review.” IP “Augmented Inspection Team.” IP “Special Inspection.” ISA summary for designated facility. EVALUATION CRITERIA: Upon completion of the tasks, you should be able to do the following: Identify the hazards (nuclear criticality safety, radiation protection, chemical safety, and fire protection) associated with your designated fuel facility. Identify the and management measures for a designated operation or process to ensure that process operations remains safe during normal and credible abnormal conditions.
Narayana ! Narayana !! Narayana !!! From “Sadhan, Sudha, Sindhu” in Hindi by Swami Ramsukhdasji Books by Swami Ramsukhdasji, can be purchased from the online store at: ***********************************************************
Qualification Card 9 Formal Training Initials Date A. Mandatory 1. Basic Health Physics Technology (H-122) Reviewers classified as Series 1306 are exempt from this requirement. Employee First Line Supervisor Licensing & Inspection (G-108) Employee First Line Supervisor Licensing Practice & Procedures (G-109) Employee Line Supervisor Note: Course selection depends on previous health physics training and on the experience of the reviewer. B. Elective Technical Courses Initial Dates 1. Safety Aspects of Industrial Radiography (H-305) __ 2. Irradiator Technology (H-315) __ 3. Transportation of Radioactive Materials (H-308) _ ___ 4. Safety Aspects of Well Logging (H-314) ________
SIGNATURE PAGE INSTRUCTIONS: All students are required to sign this form. If you are not currently in a PMM Colloquy, you only need the signature of your Wesley Seminary Academic Advisor; you are not required to have the signature of the PMM Learning Partnership. If you are in a PMM Colloquy, you only need the signature of both learning partners (clergy and lay partners); you are not required to have the signature of your academic advisor. The PMM Office will sign the application only a completed application has been submitted. Student Signature Student: Campus Box #: Date: Academic Advisor Signature (if not in PMM Placement) Academic Advisor: Date: Learning Partner Signatures (if already in PMM Placement) Clergy Partner: Date: Lay Learning Partner: Date: Practice in Ministry and Mission Signature (to be signed upon receipt of completed application) Date: Nick Works, Assistant Director
DOCUMENTATION: You should obtain your immediate supervisor’s or designee’s signature on OJT-2. Decommissioning Inspector On-the-Job Activity TOPIC: (OJT-3) Documenting Inspection Issues PURPOSE: The purpose of this activity is to give guidance on content, format, and style for inspection reports. The objectives of this activity are to ensure that inspection reports (1) clearly communicate significant inspection results to licensees, NRC staff, and the public, (2) provide a basis for significance determination and enforcement action, and (3) present information associated with significant inspection issues in a manner that will be useful to NRC management in developing longer-term, broad assessments of licensee performance. COMPETENCY AREAS: FUNDAMENTAL PLANT DESIGN AND OPERATION INSPECTION COMMUNICATION TEAMWORK ASSESSMENT AND ENFORCEMENT REFERENCES: IMC 0330, “Guidance for NRC Review of Licensee Draft Documents” IMC 0610, “Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards Inspection Reports” IMC 0620, “Inspection Documents and Records” Enforcement Policy (refer to the NRC Web site) Enforcement Manual, Appendix E, “Minor Violation Examples” EVALUATION CRITERIA: Upon completion of this activity, you will be to demonstrate your understanding of documenting inspection findings by successfully addressing the following: 1. Discuss the thresholds for determining what issues should be documented in an inspection report. 2. Describe the relationship between an of concern, and a performance deficiency. 3. Given a violation of regulatory requirements and the enforcement policy and guidance, write an inspection report input for the violation.
1248-01 PURPOSE 01.01 To define training and qualification requirements for staff under the Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs (FSME) program areas. 01.02 To establish the requirements for maintaining qualification. 1248-02 OBJECTIVES 02.01 To ensure that under the FSME program areas meet minimum knowledge and qualification standards. 02.02 To provide standardized methodology for determining that staff under the FSME program area have met the minimum knowledge and qualification requirements. 1248-03 DEFINITIONS 03.01 Inspector, License Reviewer, Project Manager, or Technical Reviewer Qualification. The certification by the office director, regional administrator, or designee, the of which is a recommendation by the qualification board and/or division management. Inspector, license reviewer, project manager, and technical reviewer are general titles indicating that an individual has completed one of the “Qualification Journals” in the appendices to this Manual Chapter. As determined by division management, the qualification may have a more specific title, such as Materials License Reviewer, Decommissioning Inspector, Uranium Recovery Project Manager or Exempt Distribution License Reviewer. Completing a qualification allows staff members to be assigned the full scope of FSME program area activities in their specific discipline. The assigned tasks are performed independently with routine oversight and supervision. 03.02 Candidate. A staff member who is working to complete one or more of the qualification journals in this Manual Chapter. 03.03 Category. An area or class of activity for which a license may be issued, such as uranium recovery, reactors, materials, and decommissioning. 03.04 Discipline. A specific qualification being sought by a candidate, such as Materials License Reviewer, Decommissioning Inspector and Uranium Recovery Inspector. 03.05 Specialized Training Courses. Additional training courses beyond those required. The candidate’s immediate supervisor determines additional training requirements depending on the candidate’s previous work experience and planned work activities. 03.06 Individual Study Activity (ISA). A training method candidates use to perform a self-study of certain topics in a specific discipline. 03.07 On-the-job Training (OJT). A training method using structured hands-on activities to develop the required job-related knowledge and skills.
Document 5 11.) How could the term assimilation be applied to our study of immigration? 12.) When in your life have you had to assimilate to a new culture? 13.) Give an example of how the term nativism could be applied to politics today? Document Organizer Document 1 1. 2. 3. 4. Document 2 5. 6. Document 3 7. 8. Document 4 9.
Immigration Resources and Information St. Francis Community Services, St. Louis, Know Your Rights: and Catholic Legal Assistance Ministry, 100 North Tucker Blvd. St. Louis, MO 63101; , National Immigration Legal Services Directory: Bi-Lingual International Assistant Services (St. Louis Office) Areas of legal assistance: Adjustment of Status, Naturalization/Citizenship Types of legal assistance: Help completing forms, Filings with USCIS, Representation before the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) Location: 1329 Macklind Ave, 210, St. Louis, MO 63110 Contact: , , Legal Services of Eastern Missouri – Immigration Law Project (St. Louis Office) Areas of legal assistance: Adjustment of Status, Consular Processing, Employment authorization, petitions, NACARA, Naturalization/Citizenship, Removal hearings, Special Immigrant Juvenile Status, T visas, U visas, Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) petitions Types of legal assistance: Help completing Filings with USCIS, Representation before
Location: 1600 S. Kingshighway, Ste. 2N, St. Louis, MO 63110 Contact: , , International Institute of St. Louis of legal assistance: Adjustment of Status, Family-based petitions, Naturalization/Citizenship Types of legal assistance: Help completing forms, Filings with USCIS Location: 3401 Arsenal Street, St. MO 63118 Contact: , , Catholic Charities of St. Louis – Catholic Immigration Law Project Areas of legal assistance: Adjustment of Status, Asylum applications, Consular Processing, Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA), Employment authorization, petitions, Naturalization/Citizenship, Removal hearings, Special Immigrant Juvenile Status, T visas, Temporary Protected Status (TPS), U visas, Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) petitions Types of legal assistance: Help completing forms, Filings with USCIS, Representation at Asylum Interviews (Credible Fear Interviews, Reasonable Fear Interviews),
Commitment Tracking Number Accession Number Issue Date Change Notice Description of Change Description of Training Required and Completion Date Comment and Feedback Resolution Accession Number N/A ML15167A079 06/24/15 CN 15-012 Revised to add IP 60715, Reserved for: Spent Fuel Safety at Operating Reactors, clarify introductory text, and incorporate recommendations in FBF-2515C-2123. No 2515C-2123 ML15175A204