Have, or accredit to, at one operational practice and/or performance-based standard that: Was set using a approach; Focuses on social and/or environmental issues; Applies at the international, regional, national or sub-national level; Is voluntary in nature; and Takes into account the ecological, cultural, and economic realities of the parts of the world in which it operates. Your mission statement, vision or equivalent guiding document. Have a governance structure that safeguards impartiality and, for standard-setting activities, enables meaningful participation of directly affected stakeholder groups. An overview of your governance structure, such as terms of reference and organisational structure. May include web links. Have a standards system that has commitment from key civil society stakeholders. Evidence that relevant civil society stakeholders have been mapped and an indication of their commitment to the program. Have an operational assurance system. This means at least one entity has already been assessed using the defined assurance requirements and procedures, or the applicant can demonstrate that at least one entity will have been assessed using the defined assurance requirements and procedures within one year of joining membership. Web link to list of certified / approved entities; Or Written explanation of plans regarding pipeline for assessment of clients/entities.
Demonstrate its long-term viability (e.g. projected income and plan for financial resilience). Evidence of current and planned income and that the financial model has been published and endorsed by governance body. Demonstrating compliance with ISEAL’s Codes of Good Practice Requirement Required Evidence Submitted via Dropbox? Demonstrate compliance with the baseline criteria of the Code and have no significant barriers to meeting the improvement criteria within the given timeframe. Completed Standard-Setting Scorecard & Evidence Checklist (two sheets in the workbook) and provided supporting evidence Completed Standard-Setting Public System Report Demonstrate compliance with the baseline criteria of the Assurance Code and have no significant barriers to meeting the improvement criteria within the given timeframe. Completed Assurance Compliance Scorecard & Evidence Checklist (two sheets in the workbook) and provided supporting evidence Completed Assurance Public System Report Demonstrate compliance with the baseline criteria of the Impacts Code and have no significant barriers to meeting the improvement criteria within the timeframe. Completed Impacts Compliance Scorecard & Evidence Checklist (two sheets in the workbook) and provided supporting evidence Completed Impacts Public System Report Notes Before you submit your Scorecard and Checklist, Public System Report and supporting evidence via Dropbox, for each Code have you: Assurance Impacts Completed a Public System Report which is concise and can be clearly understood? Coloured in your level in Scorecard self-assessment. Excel worksheet 1, Rows F-I? Selected status against Code criteria (e.g. ‘fully meets criterion’) in Checklist dropdown list for all criteria (Excel worksheet 2, Column I)? Supported ALL your statements with evidence (reference to webpage and/or file in Dropbox) in Excel worksheet 2, column H (e.g. evaluation reports, relevant clauses from procedures, evidence from stakeholder consultations, specific web links, etc.)? Included reference to page and/or paragraph numbers when evidence is a large document?