zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Version History Version Description Date 1.1 Put guide in current template. November 2011 1.0 First release. June 2008 Acknowledgments The Solution Accelerators–Management and Infrastructure (SA-MI) team acknowledges and thanks the people who produced the Infrastructure Planning and Design Guide for Selecting the Right NAP Architecture. The following people were either directly responsible for or made a substantial contribution to the writing, development, and testing of this guide. Contributors: Kurt Dillard – Studio B Productions Greg Lindsay – Microsoft Frank Simorjay – Microsoft Reviewers: Tom Cloward – Microsoft Dave Field – Studio B Productions Michael Kaczmarek – Microsoft Robin Maher – Microsoft Jeff Sigman – Microsoft Melissa Stowe – Microsoft Editors: Michelle Anderson – Studio B Productions Laurie Dunham – Xtreme Consulting Ruth Preston – Volt Technical Services Feedback Please direct questions and comments about this guide to .
Server file 64 copies Change journal Blocks that changed since previous Synch, and points Disk Server backup Server 96 per full logs logs, and points Disk Express full backup Server 512 full Volume filter a 1 bit for every block within the Blocks that have changed since previous and points Protection Type Backup Type VSS Writer Used VSS Writer Limit Storage Used on Data Source What Is Sent over the Network What Is Stored on DPM Server Media
Short Term (to Disk) SQL Server (except if log or Simple Model) backup SQL Server 96 per full logs logs, and points Disk Express full backup SQL Server 512 full Volume filter a which 1 bit for every block within the Blocks that changed since previous and points SQL Server Express full backup SQL Server 512 full Volume filter a which 1 bit for every block within the Blocks that changed since previous and points Disk shipping
MOSS Express full backup MOSS 512 express full backups Volume filter contains a bitmask, which includes 1 bit for every block within the protected dataset. Blocks that changed since previous Replica and recovery points Disk Protection Type Backup Type VSS Writer Used VSS Writer Limit Storage Used on Data Source What Is Sent over the Network What Is Stored on DPM Server Media Short Term (to Disk) VMs Express full backup or Virtual Server 512 full Volume filter a 1 bit for every block within the Blocks that changed since previous and points Disk
every block within the SQL Server (except if log or Simple backup SQL Server full only – not to protect data on tape logs logs, and points Tape Express full backup SQL Server No limit Volume filter a which 1 bit for every block within the Blocks that changed previous and points
Long Term (to Tape) SQL Server Express Full backup SQL Server No limit Volume filter a which 1 bit for every block within the Blocks that changed previous and points Tape Protection Type Backup Type VSS Writer Used VSS Writer Limit Storage Used on Data Source What Is Sent over the Network What Is Stored on DPM Server Media Long Term (to Tape) MOSS Express full backup MOSS No limit Volume filter a which 1 bit for Blocks that changed since previous and points Tape
every block within the VMs Express full backup Virtual Server/ Hyper-V No limit Volume filter a which 1 bit for every block within the Blocks that changed since previous and points Tape Record the storage planning decisions in this table. D-2. Storage Plan for DPM Protection Groups Job Aid Protection Group Name Protected Volume Change Journal Space Required Space Required Custom Volume or DPM Storage Pool Disk or Tape Storage IOps Disk and Tape Storage Location
Figure 5. Mapping of System Center Service Manager 2010 technology into Core Infrastructure Model Version History Version Description Date 1.0 First release. December 2010 Acknowledgments The Solution Accelerators–Management and Infrastructure (SA-MI) team acknowledges and thanks the people who produced the Infrastructure Planning and Design Guide for System Center Service Manager 2010. The following people were either directly responsible for or made a substantial contribution to the writing, development, and testing of this guide. Contributors: Jude Chosnyk – GrandMasters Karl Grunwald – Microsoft Michael Kaczmarek – Microsoft Doug Steen – Xtreme Consulting Group Fergus Stewart – Microsoft Melissa Stowe – Microsoft Henry Webb – Microsoft Reviewers: Vijay Aski – Microsoft Arjan van de Rest – Capgemini Darko Vukovic – Microsoft Dave Wintner – Dynamic Systems Integrators, LLC Editors: Michelle Anderson – Xtreme Consulting Group Laurie Dunham – Xtreme Consulting Group Feedback Please direct questions and comments about this guide to . We your feedback on the usefulness of this guide. Please complete the following Solution Accelerators Satisfaction Survey, available at , and help us build better guidance and tools.
A-2. Record Resource Requirements Resource Workload 1 Workload 2 Workload N Total Technique VMM Manual CPU % 60 30 Memory 2048 1024 Disk storage capacity 500 GB 20 GB Disk IOps 750 100 Network bandwidth 800 mbps 100 mbps Number of network adapters 1 1 Backup Guest Level None Network access required Private network Subnet xx.xx.xx Fault tolerance? Yes Yes Fault tolerance approach Cluster Load Balance Physical isolation requirement Yes No 3 and 7 Table A-3. Document the Backup Approach Workload name Backup approach Step 3 Table A-4. Document the Fault Tolerance Approach Workload name approach Steps 5–9 Table A-5. Document the Form Factor for the Hosts Resource Host 1 Host 2 Host N Total
Acknowledgments The Solution Accelerators - Management and Infrastructure (SA-MI) team acknowledges and thanks the people who produced the Infrastructure Planning and Design Guide for Windows Server Virtualization. The following people were either directly responsible for or made a substantial contribution to the writing, development, and testing of this guide. Contributors: Jeremy Chapman – Microsoft Jude Chosnyk – GrandMasters Joe Coulombe – Microsoft Charles Denny – Microsoft Anil Desai – Studio B Dave Field – Studio B Michael Kaczmarek – Microsoft Lex Liao – Microsoft Maher – Microsoft Lisa Pere – Studio B Fergus Stewart – Microsoft Melissa Stowe – Microsoft Reviewers: Ben Armstrong – Microsoft René Scholten – Capgemini Allen Stewart – Microsoft Editors: Michelle Anderson – Extreme Consulting Group, Inc. Vernon Barr – Volt Technical Services Laurie Dunham – Extreme Consulting Group, Inc. Kris Maxwell – Extreme Consulting Group, Inc. Pat Rytkonen – Volt Technical Services Feedback Please direct questions and comments about this guide to . We value your feedback on the usefulness of this guide. Please complete the following Solution Accelerators Satisfaction Survey, available at: , and help us build better guidance and tools.
Validate the identity of the web server. server in order to prevent a malicious server from masquerading. validate the certificate of the root CA and any intermediate CAs. Manage encrypted HTTPS traffic using ISA server and web publishing. Used to decrypt and inspect traffic, then pass it to the web server using HTTP. Certificate on the ISA server. CA chain must be accessible from all potential web clients. Used to decrypt and inspect traffic, then re-encrypt and pass it to the web server using HTTPS/SSL. Certificate on the ISA server. Certificate on the web server. CA must be accessible from all potential web clients. Authenticate the SSL client. Prove the identity of the client when it connects to the web server. The use of this certificate is optional in SSL. Certificate on all potential web clients. Private key on the web client and public key available to the web servers. Code and document signing. Prove the identity of the distributor of that code or document, and prove that the code or document has not been changed since it was signed. Certificate at the point of code or document signature. All potential recipients must have access to the chain up to the root CA. System Center Configuration Manager 2007, running in native mode. With Configuration Manager, a site can be configured in native mode in order to secure communication between the site server, site roles, and the clients. Certificate on the site server and on all clients, to verify downloaded policies. Web server certificates on the following site system roles, for SSL communications: Management point Proxy management point Distribution point Software update State migration point Client authentication certificates on all Configuration Manager clients Encrypting File System (EFS) EFS is a Windows encryption technology used to store encrypted files on NTFS file system volumes. Encrypted files cannot be used unless the user has access to the keys required to decrypt the information. Certificate on the encrypting machine. Certificate on the decrypting machine. Recovery key on a domain controller. Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) L2TP (IPsec) and SSTP VPNs can use certificates to encrypt traffic that is sent through the VPN connection. If PPTP VPN uses EAP-TLS for authentication, a certificate is required on each VPN server. CA chain must
Contributors: Jude Chosnyk – GrandMasters Joe Coulombe – Microsoft Michael Kaczmarek – Microsoft Douglas Steen – Xtreme Consulting Fergus Stewart – Microsoft Melissa Stowe – Microsoft Henry Webb – Microsoft Reviewers: de Boer – Capgemini Claus Jespersen – Microsoft John Morello – Microsoft Florian Schneider – Microsoft Editor: Laurie Dunham – Xtreme Consulting Pat Rytkonen – Volt Technical Services Feedback Please direct questions and comments about this guide to .
Rajeev Agrawal – Microsoft Fernando Cima – Microsoft Joseph Davies – Microsoft Dan Griffin – JW Secure, Inc. Devrim Iyigun – Microsoft Michael Niehaus – Microsoft Christopher Palmer – Microsoft René Scholten – Capgemini Sean – Microsoft Andy Tang – Microsoft Pat Telford – Microsoft Editors: Laurie Dunham – Xtreme Consulting Group Pat Rytkonen – Volt Technical Services Feedback Please direct questions and comments about this guide to .
unified GAL, or as a resource forest topology with an Exchange forest and one or more user account forests (see ). In these cases, Microsoft recommends contacting Microsoft Consulting Services or a certified Microsoft partner to consult on the design. Record the number of Exchange Server instances in A-3 in Appendix A. The remaining tasks and steps in the guide should be repeated for each instance of Exchange Server identified in this task. Task 2: Determine the Active Directory Host Forest, Site, and Domain In this task, determine which Active Directory forest, site, and domain will be used to host this instance of Exchange Server 2010. Exchange Server has no specific requirements relative to forest, site, or domain locations. This decision will inform subsequent decisions relative to domain controller placement. Record this in Table A-4 in Appendix A. Step Summary In this step, the number of messaging server instances was determined, on the business requirements identified in Step 1. Also, the Active Directory domains that will host the messaging system were determined. The information gathered in this step was recorded in Tables A-3 and A-4 in Appendix A and will be used in subsequent steps to design the remaining server infrastructure. Additional Reading Planning Active Directory (Exchange Server 2010 SP1): FIM 2010 Technical Overview: Infrastructure Planning and Design for Active Directory Domain Services: Deploy Multiple Forest Topologies: Step 3: Design the Mailbox Server Infrastructure In the previous step, the number of messaging server instances was determined based on the business requirements identified in Step 1. Also, the Active Directory forest, site, and domains that will host this instance of Exchange Server 2010 were determined. In this step, the Mailbox server role instances are designed. Mailbox servers store all Exchange mailboxes, which hold email messages, calendar items, contacts, and so on. The tasks to be performed in this step are: Determine role placement. Plan for capacity. Plan for performance. Plan for fault tolerance.
for or made a substantial contribution to the writing, development, and testing of this guide. Contributors: Jude Chosnyk – GrandMasters Dave Field – Studio B Gerend – Microsoft Mike Kaczmarek – Microsoft Maher – Microsoft Melissa Stowe – Microsoft Fergus Stewart – Microsoft Reviewers: Drew McDaniel – Microsoft Mahesh Unnikrishnan – Microsoft Editors: Vernon Barr – Volt Technical Services Laurie Dunham – Xtreme Consulting Pat Rytkonen – Volt Technical Services Feedback Please direct questions and comments this guide to .
components that will be required to support that feature set. Record which components will be required in Table A-4 in Appendix A. If multiple feature sets are selected, the components are additive, meaning that if identity management, user profile management, and certificate management functionalities are selected, the FIM Synchronization Service, FIM Synchronization Service database, FIM Service, FIM Service database, FIM Portal, FIM Certificate Management, and FIM Certificate Management database will all be required. However, multiple instances of the services will not necessarily be required because a single instance can be used to provide multiple capabilities. Table 2. FIM Feature Set to Infrastructure Component Mapping Functionality FIM Synchronization Service and FIM Synchronization Service database FIM Service, FIM Service database, and FIM Portal FIM Password Portal FIM Client software FIM Service mailbox on Exchange 2007 or Exchange 2010 Password Change Notification Service (PCNS) on Domain Controllers FIM CM, FIM CM database, and FIM CM Client Identity management (classic functionality) X Password synchronization X X X Password self-service X X O X User profile management X X Group management from portal X X management from Outlook X X X X Declarative provisioning X X Certificate management O O X X = Required O = Optional Step Summary In this step, the infrastructure components that will be required to support the desired feature sets were determined and recorded in Table A-4 in Appendix A.
Version History Version Description Date 1.1 Minor updates for formatting consistencies. November 2011 1.0 release. June 2010 Acknowledgments The Solution Accelerators–Management and Infrastructure (SA-MI) team acknowledges and thanks the people who produced the Infrastructure Planning and Design Guide for Forefront Identity Manager 2010. The following people were either directly responsible for or made a substantial contribution to the writing, development, and testing of this guide. Contributors: Jude Chosnyk – GrandMasters Joe Coulombe – Microsoft Mike Kaczmarek – Microsoft Jeremy Palenchar – FIM Subject Matter Expert Fergus Stewart – Microsoft Melissa Stowe – Microsoft Henry Webb – Microsoft Reviewers: Brjann Brekkan – Microsoft Mark Wahl – Microsoft Editor: Laurie Dunham – Xtreme Consulting Group Pat Rytkonen – Volt Feedback Please direct questions and comments about this guide to .
Chicago-4 RDP 7 clients Microsoft Office Visio® Design engineers - north N Office Visio Design engineers - south Y Office Word Finance Publishing N Microsoft Office Excel® Finance N Table A-4. Farm Design (continued) Number of RD Session Host servers and form factor User profiles User profile store User data store Number of RD Connection Broker servers and form factor Fault tolerance 4 of 2.66, CPU, 4 GB of memory, RAID0+1, 12 terabytes, 3 network adapters Mandatory 50 MB, on file server G27-336 1 terabyte, on file server G27-338 4 of 2.66, 64-bit CPU, 4 GB of memory, RAID0+1, 12 terabytes, 3 network adapters Cluster Table A-4. Farm Design (continued) Locations of RD Connection Broker servers and farms shared with Number of RD Web Access servers and form factor tolerance Locations of RD Web Access servers and shared with Number of RD Licensing servers and form factor Chicago data center Chicago-7 Farm On 9 IIS servers in IIS server farm A Windows NLB Chicago data center Chicago-7 Farm 4x2.66, 64-bit CPU, 4 GB of memory, RAID0+1, 12 terabytes, 3 network adapters
strategy. IPD helps to define an architecture that delivers the right solution as determined in the Plan Phase. Use the Deliver Phase to build solutions and deploy updated technology. In this phase, IPD helps IT pros design their technology infrastructures. Use the Operate to plan for operations, service monitoring and control, as well as troubleshooting. The appropriate infrastructure, built with the help of IPD guides, can increase the efficiency and effectiveness of operating activities. Use the Manage Layer to work effectively and efficiently to make decisions that are in compliance with management objectives. The full value of sound architectural practices embodied in IPD will help deliver value to the top levels of a business. Figure C-1. The architecture of Microsoft Operations Framework (MOF) 4.0 Version History Version Description Date 1.2 Minor guide updates to conform to current IPD template. January 2012 1.1 Added “What’s New in SQL Server 2008 R2” section. Added Step 2, Task 5, “Determine If SQL Server Master Data Services Is Required.” Added Step 7, “Design the SQL Server Master Data Services Infrastructure.” Updated decision flow and step listings accordingly. May 2010 1.0 release. February 2009 Acknowledgments The Solution Accelerators–Management and Infrastructure (SA-MI) team acknowledges and thanks the people who produced the Infrastructure Planning and Design Guide for Microsoft SQL Server 2008 and SQL Server 2008 R2. The following people were either directly responsible for or made a substantial contribution to the writing, development, and testing of this guide. Contributors: Steve Abraham – Xtreme Consulting Group Jude Chosnyk – GrandMasters Michael Kaczmarek – Microsoft Greg Low – GrandMasters Robin Maher – Microsoft Fergus Stewart – Microsoft Melissa Stowe – Microsoft
Rajat Kumar – Microsoft Arjan van de Rest – Capgemini Ranganathan Srikanth – Microsoft Darko Vukovic – Microsoft Kathleen Wilson – Microsoft Dave Wintner – Dynamic Systems Integrators, LLC Editors: Michelle Anderson – Xtreme Consulting Group Laurie Dunham – Xtreme Consulting Group Feedback Please direct questions and comments about this guide to .
Doug Steen – Xtreme Consulting Group Fergus Stewart – Microsoft Melissa Stowe – Microsoft Michelle Travis – GrandMasters Reviewers: Virginia Benedict Tabrez Mohammed – Microsoft Richard Rundle – Microsoft Carmen Summers – Microsoft Editor: Laurie Dunham – Xtreme Consulting Group Feedback Please direct questions and comments this guide to .
role is used) SLP Locates management points for Configuration Manager clients. Clients are in a workgroup or in a different forest from the site and cannot query their site assignments in AD DS. Scales to primary site capacity, is 100,000 clients, or 300,000 clients with System Center Configuration Manager 2007 R3. One per hierarchy. FSP Gathers state messages from clients that cannot be installed properly, cannot be assigned to a Configuration Manager site, or cannot communicate securely with their assigned MPs. Useful for troubleshooting, particularly at client installation. Receives communications from clients unsecured HTTP and so represents a security exposure—may be inappropriate in Internet-based sites. Up to 100,000 clients (or one per site). One per site. RP Hosts the site’s reporting website. It delivers reports using data from the database to the SMS Provider interface for display in the web console. If reports are required from Configuration Manager, will usually be the case. Scales to primary site capacity, is 100,000 clients, or 300,000 clients with System Center Configuration Manager 2007 R3. One per site. RSP A site system role assigned to a computer running SQL Server Reporting Services. It provides tools and resources that enable advanced report generation from the Configuration Manager console. If custom reports are required, particularly for use by business users. Scales to site capacity, which is 200,000 clients or 300,000 clients with System Center Configuration Manager 2007 R3. One per site.
Acknowledgments The Solution Accelerators–Management and Infrastructure (SA-MI) team acknowledges and thanks the people who produced the Infrastructure Planning and Design Guide for Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager 2007 R3 and Forefront Endpoint Protection. The following people were either directly responsible for or made a substantial contribution to the writing, development, and testing of this guide. Contributors: Jude Chosnyk – GrandMasters Karl Grunwald – Microsoft Michael Kaczmarek – Microsoft Robin Maher – Microsoft Terry Matthews – GrandMasters Eric Orman – Microsoft Fergus Stewart – Microsoft Melissa Stowe – Microsoft Henry Webb – Microsoft Reviewers: Bill Anderson – Microsoft Yumin Guo – Microsoft Edo Jorritsma – Capgemini Adwait Joshi – Microsoft Udo Karten – Capgemini Wally Mead – Microsoft Michael Niehaus – Microsoft Abhishek Pathak – Microsoft Josh Pointer – Microsoft Przemek (Shem) Radzikowski – Microsoft Martin Ruiter – Capgemini Rob – Microsoft Ron Thomas – GrandMasters Arthur van den Berg – Capgemini Jeroen van Reijmersdaal – Capgemini Editors: Michelle Anderson – Xtreme Consulting Group Laurie Dunham – Xtreme Consulting Group Pat Rytkonen – Volt Technical Services
List 2-3 specific Learning for your personal professional development which will impact student learning? Explain how each goal will be monitored and evidence provided to the LPDC. Exemplars of Learning Goal Statements… …must be new learning activities …should cite an area of knowledge …should cite a rationale. Have a process to be monitored. Explain how evidence will be provided to the LPDC for license verification I will research and implement best practices in reading to improve reading levels for all of my students to prepare students for the 6th grade OAA. This will be monitored through lesson plans, student reflection, university coursework, and workshop attendance, and test score results. Evidence will be provided through official university grade cards and CEU certificates from workshops. I will investigate classroom management techniques to maintain and safe and conducive classroom learning environment. This will be monitored through student office referrals, student feedback, and test scores. Evidence will be provided through CEU certificates from workshops on classroom management. I will take responsibility through participation on the BLT to develop and execute action in supporting the building goals. This will be monitored through action plans, agendas, minutes, and test scores. Evidence will be provided through university cards. *Do not just copy the exemplars above Learning Goal 1: Process to be Monitored: Possible Evidence for LPDC Credit Through: Course Credit CEU Credit Both of the Above
G3 Project planning and management 2 Use project management methodology to plan and organise projects effectively. Ideally, this should Include quality control and time management. Develop the necessary skills to manage projects to meet agreed standards, objectives and targets. G4 Team working 3 Work effectively in a team. Demonstrate constructive working relationships with colleagues and others. G5 Team leadership 2 Work effectively in a team, including the ability to provide leadership as appropriate. G6 Staff appraisal 2 Have an appreciation of personnel/ staff assessment and appraisal procedures. G7 Negotiating with 'customers' or regulators 2 Demonstrate constructive working relationships with others affected by your work (e.g. fund holders, suppliers, regulators, clients), including your influencing and negotiating skills. G8 Handling budgets and estimating 2 Demonstrate reliable estimating skills, including budgets and programmes. G9 Contractual obligations 3 Including intellectual property rights. G10 Information management and IT skills 4 Using your knowledge of information management, develop and extend your general and specific IT skills. G11 Health & safety requirements/risk management 2 Using your knowledge of current health & safety legislation, demonstrate a commitment to health, safety and risk management in the workplace. G12 Ethics (e.g. Code of Conduct) 4 Comply with the Code of Conduct and behave with integrity and in an ethical manner. G13 Continuing Professional Development 4 Demonstrate a commitment to Continuing Professional Development. This is included on the IPD form because a potential CMath holder must demonstrate a commitment to Continuing Professional Development.
“Voluntary export restraints” (VERs) have become the by which the US has sought to cartelize industrial sectors threatened by imports, like textiles and apparel, steel, footwear, television sets, and autos In US, after a deal reached, what happens to negotiated protectionism? Trade barriers do not persist automatically, as is generally assumed Three patterns of protectionism: Temporary – US negotiates agreements with one or several exporters, but allows them to after some initial period Examples: color TV and footwear Institutionalized – protectionist agreements expand over time, becoming more complex and gradually encompassing larger numbers of exporting countries and more categories of products, persisting across administrations Examples: textiles and apparel mid-1950s Sporadic – initial agreements but protectionism subsequently renegotiated Example: industry How to account for patterns? Three key variables: size of the industry, height of economic barriers restricting entry of foreign producers into an industry, and exit or adjustment strategies of domestic firms Negotiated protectionism is NOT the same as tariffs or auctioned quotas Unilateral forms of protectionism attempt to shift the burden of adjustment from an importer to an exporter, while VERs constitute cross-national cartel agreements that seek to allocate market shares between exporters and importers, thereby sharing the benefits and burdens of protectionism VERs restrict exports from specific countries in specific product categories and are generally negotiated on a country-by-country basis High barriers to entry should produce a relatively stable cartel; conversely, low barriers to entry should weaken the effectiveness of a VER because unrestrained foreign producers will immediately begin exporting to the US If high barrier to entry, expect protection will be temporary in initial round; if firms can exit, protection will not be renewed; in industries with high barriers to exit: if they do not adjust, will lead to renewed protectionism If low barrier to entry: If protectionism to raise profits for a domestic industry, then firms will increase the intensity of their demand for future trade barriers and the US government will generally be sympathetic towards supplying additional protection If trade barriers improve an industry's economic health, then firms in that industry will reduce the intensity of their lobbying efforts, and the government will be less receptive to those pleas Aggarwal (1985): “Institutionalized protectionism” case Textile and apparel industries followed a joint strategy in securing protection from imports since the late 1950s Eisenhower administration opted for VER with just one country, Japan, in 1957
change 17AD(c) Report on the performance of the entity Annual performance statements 17AD(c)(i); 16F 12–15 Annual performance statement in accordance with paragraph 39(1)(b) of the Act and section 16F of the Rule Mandatory 17AD(c)(ii) Report on financial performance 17AF(1)(a) 25–26 A discussion and analysis of the entity’s financial performance Mandatory 17AF(1)(b) 56–57 A summarising the total resources and total payments of the entity Mandatory 17AF(2) not applicable If there may be significant changes in the financial results during or after the previous or current reporting period, information on those changes, including the cause of any operating loss of the entity; how the entity has responded to the loss and the actions that have been taken in relation to the loss; and any matter or circumstances that it can reasonably be anticipated will have a significant impact on the entity’s future operation or financial results If applicable, Mandatory 17AD(d) Management and accountability Corporate governance 17AG(2)(a) iii Information on compliance with section 10 systems) Mandatory 17AG(2)(b)(i) iii A certification by accountable authority that fraud risk assessments and fraud control plans have been prepared Mandatory 17AG(2)(b)(ii) iii A certification by accountable authority that appropriate mechanisms for preventing, detecting incidents of, investigating or otherwise dealing with, and recording or reporting fraud that meet the specific needs of the entity are in place Mandatory 17AG(2)(b)(iii) iii A certification by accountable authority that all reasonable measures have been to deal appropriately with fraud relating to the entity Mandatory 17AG(2)(c) 17–26 An outline of structures and processes in place for the entity to implement principles and objectives of corporate governance Mandatory 17AG(2)(d)-(e) 26 A statement of significant issues reported to minister under paragraph 19(1)(e) of the Act that relates to non-compliance with finance law and action taken to remedy If applicable, Mandatory External scrutiny
Very Helpful Helpful Somewhat Helpful Not Very Helpful Not Helpful At All A checklist that requires you to open/unlock and check your pediatric equipment daily      Pediatric drug dosing cards with drug doses in milliliters for a specific weight      A Broselow-life tape specific for EMS (only has drugs that you use)      Eliminating the calculations required for drug dosing      An EMS-specific smart phone app for pediatrics      Taking a pediatric course (PALS, PEPP) every 6 to 12 months      Changing pediatric courses (PALS, PEPP) to be more relevant to what I do in the field      Doing weekly pediatric drug dosing practice problems      Having a pediatric patient's weight from dispatch en route to a call      Communication with a physician for drug doses      28. I am familiar with a case where EMS personnel gave an incorrect dose of medicine to a pediatric patient.  Yes  No 29. I get enough exposure, in my job as a paramedic, to pediatric patients to maintain proficiency in caring for pediatric patients  Strongly agree   Undecided  Disagree  Strongly disagree 30. Does your EMS agency have an anonymous error reporting system (if you make an error you can report it anonymously via recorded phone message, text, internet form, etc)?  Yes  No 31. I can report an error to my superiors without fear of disciplinary action.  Strongly agree
Entry into the examination room will not be guaranteed if you do not have your candidate number and ID and receipt. (You could consider printing and binding your receipt and your candidate number confirmation email into your bound notes to make sure you don’t forget them.) How does the timing work? On the day, the timing will run as follows. 12.30–12.50pm: Candidates will be processed by invigilation team (notes and reference books checked, candidate numbers and receipts etc. Once you’ve registered you’ll be able to enter the exam room to find a spot and check the equipment (but you won’t be allowed to open up any of the exam documents). 12.50pm: The invigilators will usher everyone into the exam room. 12.55–1.00pm: The invigilators will brief candidates on how the exam will be run and will explain what to do if you need to go to the toilet or if there is an emergency. 1.00–1.10pm: Candidates will read the printed exam instructions. 1.10–1.30pm: Candidates will open and save each of their exam documents and type their candidate numbers in. (This will be facilitated by the lead invigilator.) Candidates will also log into the Macquarie Dictionary Online if they have a subscription. 1.30–2.00pm: Reading time (exam papers). 2.00–5.00pm: Working time. What time should I arrive at the exam centre? Candidates should plan to arrive with enough time to ensure invigilators can check their resources, ID, candidate numbers and receipts. In Melbourne there are usually 30+ candidates, so we suggest you aim to arrive at least 30 minutes before the exam room opens (i.e. around 12.15). In Sydney, Canberra and Brisbane there are usually 14–20 candidates per centre, so plan to arrive at least 20 minutes before the exam room opens (i.e. no later than 12.30, but preferably a bit earlier). In Adelaide, Hobart and Perth there are usually fewer than 10 candidates, so we suggest you plan to arrive about 20 minutes before the exam room opens (i.e. no later than 12.30). It is better to be early than be in a rush. Tea and coffee will be available so if you’re early or have spare time you’ll be able to partake of refreshments.
Budget Template Complete this worksheet with anticipated funding needs for the IPEG. You are required to provide a narrative justification for each category. Personnel: Salary support may be requested for administrative services, student workers, research assistants, or other support staff. Support for consultants and other professional personnel are allowable, with appropriate justification. Names of the personnel should be specified wherever appropriate in the proposal. Administrative Services (including support staff) $ Student Workers $ Research Assistants $ Consultants $ Insert personnel $ Total $ Justification: Supplies: Supplies that are necessary for the successful completion of the project should be requested. insert supply $ insert supply $ insert supply $ insert supply $ insert supply $ Total $ Justification: Travel: Up to $1,000 may be requested for travel. Such funding will only be approved if the travel is necessary for the project or for specific and unique training opportunities consistent with the proposal. Travel support will not be provided for presentation of project results at national or international meetings. Instate Travel (estimate expense) $ Out-of-state Travel (estimate expense) $ Training Opportunity (estimate expense) $ Total $ Justification: Equipment: Equipment that is necessary for the project may be purchased for use during the award period. However, this equipment will remain the property of the Office of Educational Affairs. Any simulation equipment purchases will be ordered through and maintained in the iCELS. Appropriate justification must be made for all equipment requested. Sharing of equipment is encouraged to justify its sustained use by a broad range of users. insert equipment request $ insert equipment request $ insert equipment request $ insert equipment request $ Total $ Justification: Total Budget (not to exceed $7,500) $
Integrated planning is essential to a thriving community college. As such, the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges (RP Group) conducted an extensive literature review in an effort to identify key themes with respect to this topic. From a broad array of resources, the RP Group was able to identify components that are central to various applications of integrated planning. The Five Themes of Integrated Planning Prioritize the Student Body—The characteristics that make-up the student body should as a guide for the direction of planning efforts. Create/Enhance a Planning Committee—Although rather this basic step is crucial in setting the tone, energy, and eventual productivity of committee meetings through careful, comprehensive selection of engaged individuals. Leverage an External can be helpful by bringing in an outside perspective that is unaffected by the undercurrent of inter-departmental agendas; this can provide the objective offset to get a truly introspective process rolling. Implement a Collaborative Inquiry Process—Endorse procedures and process that ensure member on the committee a) represents distinct campus constituencies and b) is engaged and included in thought-provoking discussion, goal generating, and decision making. Flexible Planning— Incorporating diverse tools and methods to make plans adaptable to foreseeable (and unforeseeable) positive and negative factors. Definitions of Themes A more detailed definition for each of the five identified themes is presented here. Prioritize the Student Body—Infused in the planning process should be discussion of the unique characteristics, demographics, and social norms of each institution’s student body. This means that the development of goals, objectives, and activities should avoid generic generalizations and assumptions. Instead, utilize sub-population data to accompany planning efforts. Create/Enhance a Planning Committee—It is important to identify
P_ADD_DAYS. How many days per week does your child live at your address? __________ P_C_BDATE. Your child’s birth date: ______ _______ _______ Month Day Year P_C_GENDER. gender: 0. Male 1. Female P_C_RACE. Child’s race (you can check one or more): modify as needed to reflect your population. 1. Caucasian 2. African-American or 3. Asian-American 4. Pacific Islander 5. American Indian or Alaskan Native 6. Other _____________ P_C_LIC. Does your have a valid driver’s license? 1. Yes 0. No P_C_CARACC. Does your have access to a car to drive? 1. Yes 0. No P_C_GRADES. In school, your child makes the following grades: (check one answer only) modify as needed to reflect common grade assignations in your country. 1. Mostly A's and B's 2. Mostly C's 3. Mostly D's and F's Parent Demographics: Please respond about yourself. P_P_AGE. Your age: ________ P_P_GENDER. Your gender: 0. Male 1. Female P_P_RACE. Your race (you can check one or more): modify as needed to reflect your population. 1. Caucasian 2. African-American or Black 3. Asian-American 4. Pacific Islander 5. American Indian or Alaskan Native 6. Other _____________ P_MAR. What is your marital status? 1. Married 2. Widowed/divorced/separated
Illinois Principal Evaluation Plan Final Summative Evaluation 2012-2013 Principal: Evaluator: Summative Evaluation Rating: ____ Excellent – The principal or assistant principal demonstrates consistently exemplary performance. ____ Proficient - The principal or assistant principal demonstrates consistently strong performance. ____ Improvement - The principal or assistant principal demonstrates inconsistent performance in need of immediate improvement. ____ Unsatisfactory - The principal or assistant principal demonstrates unacceptable performance. Professional Practice Rating: ____ Distinguished ____ Proficient ____ Basic ____ Needs Improvement Student Growth: ____ Much Above Target ____ Above Target ____ On Target ____ Less Than Target Professional Development Target Standard # and Indicators Standard # and Indicators PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE MONITORING TOOL
Octet No. Contents 15 of the Earth (see Code table 3.2) 16 Scale factor of radius of spherical Earth 17–20 Scaled value of radius of spherical Earth 21 Scale factor of major axis of oblate spheroid Earth 22–25 Scaled value of major axis of oblate spheroid Earth 26 Scale factor of minor axis of oblate spheroid Earth 27–30 Scaled value of minor axis of oblate spheroid Earth 31–34 Nx – number of points along the x-axis 35–38 Ny – number of points along the y-axis 39–42 La1 – latitude of first grid point 43–46 Lo1 – longitude of first grid point 47 Resolution and component flags (see Flag table 3.3) 48–51 LatC – latitude of the projection center 52–55 LonC – longitude of the projection center 56–59 Dx – x-direction grid length (see Note 1) 60–63 Dy – y-direction grid length (see Note 1) 64 Projection centre flag (see Flag 3.5) 65 Scanning mode (see Flag table 3.4) Notes: (1) Grid lengths are in of 10-3 m. Within the particular context of the FV3 cubed sphere, it would also be helpful for post-processing purposes to indicate, for each of the 6 projected grids, how they are to be stitched back together to form the original cube surrounding the sphere. Perhaps this could be done by the addition of two new octets to the above template, where the first octet would indicate the total number N of related grids (or, in a sense, “tiles”?) The value N would be set equal to 6 in the case of FV3 but could vary for other potential uses of gnomonic grids, and the second octet would indicate the grid (or “tile”?) number (ranging from 1 to N) being represented within each successive repetition of the template. Assuming it is agreed that this would be a useful and proper feature for inclusion within the proposed GDT, we would certainly welcome other suggestions from experts on alternative ways to accomplish this.
Kiribati 46 0 Malaysia 2 98 Nauru 0 0 New Caledonia 83 50 New Zealand 100 95 Niue 28 27 Papua New Guinea 24 14 Philippines 89 84 Phoenix Islands 0 0 28 0 Singapore 100 100 Solomon Islands 87 72 Timor-Leste 0 0 Tokelau (And Swains Is.) 0 0 Tonga 70 69 Tuvalu 50 0 Vanuatu 78 0 REGION 6 Armenia 100 0 Austria 100 96 Azerbaijan 100 0 Belarus 100 87 Belgium 100 95 Bosnia And Herzegovina 78 78 Bulgaria 100 0 Croatia 93 70 Cyprus 100 7 Czech Republic 100 95 Denmark And Faroe Islands 99 73 Estonia 100 99 Finland 100 100 France 100 100 Georgia 89 0 Germany 100 100 Gibraltar 98 98 Greece 91 87 Greenland 74 28 Hungary 100 100 Iceland 57 55 Ireland 100 100 Israel 100 38 Italy 92 100 Jordan 96 0 Kazakhstan 100 0 Latvia 100 85 Lebanon 95 0 Lithuania 100 100
SECTION 22 11 16 DOMESTIC WATER PIPING GENERAL SECTION INCLUDES CPVC pipe, fittings, and valves for domestic water piping. RELATED SECTIONS Division 01 Section “Administrative Requirements” Division 01 Section “Submittal Procedures” Division 07 Section “Fire and Smoke Protection” Division 22 Section “Plumbing” Division 22 Section “Operation and Maintenance of Plumbing” Division 22 Section “Common Work Results for Plumbing” Division 22 Section “Schedules for Plumbing” Division 22 Section “Plumbing Insulation” Division 22 Section “Commissioning of Plumbing” Division 22 Section “Plumbing Piping” Division 22 Section “Facility Water Distribution” STANDARDS, AND REFERENCES
Ainderby Steeple Danby Wiske Deighton East Rounton Ellerbeck Great Langton Hornby Kepwick (part NYMNP) Low Worsall Nether Silton (part NYMNP) Over Dinsdale Over Silton (part NYMNP) Streetlam Thimbleby (part NYMNP) Thrintoft Welbury Yafforth Ainderby Quernhow Balk Carlton Husthwaite Catton Cowesby (part NYMNP) Felixkirk Great Thirkleby Holme Howe Hutton Sessay Kilburn (part NYMNP) Wiske Little Thirkleby Maunby Newby Wiske Sinderby Skipton-on-Swale Sutton under Whitestonecliffe Thirlby (part NYMNP) Thornton-le-Beans Thornton-le-Moor Thornton-le-Street Upsall Burrill Carthorpe Clifton on Yore Exelby Firby Gatenby Great Fencote Hackforth Kirklington Langthorne Little Fencote Londonderry Nosterfield Sutton Howgrave Theakston Thirn Thornborough Aldwark Alne Station Brandsby Farlington Flawith Myton-on-Swale Newton-on-Ouse Oulston Skewsby Stearsby Tholthorpe Thormanby Yearsley Whenby Easby Great Busby Kirkby in Cleveland Middleton-on-Leven Newby Picton Potto Rudby Seamer Tame Bridge
Title Composer (xxxx-xxxx) Title Composer (xxxx-xxxx) Title Composer (xxxx-xxxx) Title Composer (xxxx-xxxx) INTERMISSION Title Composer (xxxx-xxxx) Title Composer (xxxx-xxxx) Title Composer (xxxx-xxxx) Title Composer (xxxx-xxxx) Title Composer (xxxx-xxxx) Title Composer (xxxx-xxxx)andrew. GUEST ARTIST BIOGRAPHY IMPULSE PERCUSSION GROUP PERSONNEL Name, city, state Name, city, state Name, city, state Name, city, state Name, city, state Name, city, state Name, city, state Name, city, state Name, city, state Name, city, state Name, city, state Name, city, state Name, city, state Name, city, state Name, city, state Name, city, state Name, city, state Name, city, state SPECIAL THANKS List names here
research, speeding on 30mph roads was more commonly reported than speeding on 60mph roads.20 Reducing road traffic collisions, injuries and fatalities It has been estimated that a reduction of one mile per hour in existing low speed areas resulted in 5% fewer collisions.21 A recent review of the effects of 20mph zones and limits on health and health inequalities concluded that there was convincing evidence on the effectiveness of these measures in reducing accidents, injuries, traffic speed and volume, as well as improving the perception of safety. The findings of this review are summarised below:22 A UK study examining the impact of 20mph speed zones in 200 small residential areas found: 61% reduction in total injuries; 70% reduction in child pedestrian injuries; 48% reduction in injuries; 6.2% reduction in accidents for each 1mph reduction in speed; and On average speed reduced from 25 to 16mph23 Studies in the Netherlands reported similar effects at 30km/hr: 5% reduction in accidents; 25% reduction in injuries; 85% of traffic travelling at a mean speed of <30km/hr and a 15-30% reduction in traffic volume;24 25% in injuries over a 15 year period; considered to be a cost-effective intervention.25 A German study found a 25% reduction in accidents in an area where 30km/hr limits were in place.26 In Denmark, 15-30km/hr speed zones were associated with a 64% reduction in road user injuries27; whilst a London based study reported a 45% reduction in injuries in 20mph zones.28 A speed limit of 20mph (30km/hr) slows traffic down sufficiently to adapt to the presence of pedestrians and other road users; a person is seven times more likely to survive if hit by a car travelling at 20mph rather than 30mph.29 Lowering the speed limit to 20mph reduces collisions between vehicles and children by up to 70%.30 Research suggests that one of the risk factors for children in fast traffic environments is a developmental issue: their eyes and brains are not yet mature enough to be able to judge speeds over 20mph.31
Assistance Plan - here is what you will do to support yourself in this process: Description Initial Discussion date: _____ ___________________________/______________ ___________________________/______________ Employee’s Signature (Blue Ink Only) Date Administrator’s Signature (Blue Ink Only) Date Date(s) for Follow-Up: ______________________________ Comments: ___________________________/______________ ___________________________/______________ Employee’s Signature (Blue Ink Only) Date Administrator’s Signature (Blue Ink Only) Date Date(s) for Follow-Up Review: ______________________________ Comments: ___________________________/______________ ___________________________/______________ Employee’s Signature (Blue Ink Only) Date Administrator’s Signature (Blue Ink Only) Date Continued Closed
ip rEGISTER GRDC Project Number: [INSERT] Prepared by: [INSERT NAME OF PERSON WHO PREPARED THIS IP REGISTER] [INSERT] Approved by: [INSERT NAME OF RESEARCH ORGANISATION PERSON WHO APPROVED THIS IP REGISTER] Dated: [INSERT] Background IP – Research Organisation No Owner/s Description Date made available to Project Restrictions on use for dissemination or Commercialisation of Project Outputs Background IP – GRDC No Owner/s Description Date made available to Project Restrictions on use for dissemination or Commercialisation of Project Outputs Third Party IP No Owner/s Description Date made available to Project and name of Party making it available Restrictions on use for dissemination or Commercialisation of Project Outputs
Project Outputs No Description Date created and reported BIP / TIP incorporated Restrictions on use for dissemination or Commercialisation of Project Outputs Project Outputs provided to a third party No party recipient Description of Project Outputs Type of of transfer eg licence, material transfer or assignment Purpose of transfer eg internal research Date prior approval granted by GRDC and RO for transfer Date of transfer
Navigate to your settings App on your IPad or IPhone, which looks like a Set of Gears In the settings app scroll to “Mail Contacts and Calendars” In the Mail section Select “Add Account” In the “add account” section select Exchange The first screen in “Exchange” will request your account information. Type in your: email address Password Any Description can be entered. The default is Exchange See Note at the Bottom of page 6 for user ID and password information This will expand the window and you will have to fill some more information: For server type “fsmail.ben.edu” For domain type “ben” For user name enter your username Re-Type your password See Note at the Bottom of this page for user ID and password information **Note The username for staff and faculty would be the first letter of your first name and your last name. The username for students would be your BenU ID (7 digit number) with the “b” in front.