zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
IT Support Analyst Job Description Accountable to Finance Manager Job purpose To provide a first line and second line IT help desk service to Together Offices and Sites, ensure that issues are logged and resolved promptly in line with the agreed priorities, and ensure that end users are updated with the current status of any issues. To prepare, deliver, install and process returns of IT equipment used by Together staff. To setup and maintain user access rights in line with Information Governance policy and with approved requests. To undertake specific IT projects as required by the IT Consultant/Manager. Key responsibilities To provide technical support to telephone and e-mail requests from users for all IT services. To log support calls and document their outcome within the Helpdesk software. To escalate unresolved issues as required. To proactively provide information to users on the progress of outstanding support calls. To troubleshoot issues and find solutions to problems. To deploy IT Equipment including new installations and the secure recycling and redeployment of existing IT equipment to documented standards. To install, configure and maintain operating systems, security, anti-virus and business software to agreed standards. To assist in the compilation and maintenance of an accurate hardware and software inventory. To liaise with any third party suppliers as required.
The Division of Information Technology, Engineering and the Environment (‘the Division’) have allocated funding of $200,000 for the Industry Leader in Residence program in 2017. It is anticipated that this funding will enable one or two industry leaders in residence per annum, dependent on duration and costs. Non-technical and clear language should be used throughout the application. Please refer to the accompanying Aims and Criteria for completion of your application. SECTION 1: APPLICANTS DETAILS Title: First Name(s): Surname: Position: Institute/School Correspondence from the Institute/School providing a commitment to host the nominated residence, if successful, is required. Is a copy of this correspondence attached? ☐ Yes No (please advise reasons as to why). SECTION 2: NOMINATED INDUSTRY LEADER IN RESIDENCE Name: Industry/ sector: Organisation: Phone Number: E-mail Address: Proposed length of residence: Where applicable, correspondence from the nominated resident’s employer providing a commitment to outpost their employee for the duration of the residence, if successful, is required. Is a copy of this correspondence attached? ☐ Yes No (please advise reasons as to why). SECTION 3: RESIDENCE SKILLS, KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE Provide a brief overview of the nominated industry leaders skills, knowledge and experience. Attach a copy of their CV. Is a copy of their CV attached? ☐ Yes No
e-Signature of Applicant Printed Name Date SECTION 7: DEAN RESEARCH & INNOVATION (OR DELEGATE) CERTIFICATION Approved Not approved (specify reason) e-Signature of Dean of Research & Innovation Printed Name Date SECTION 8: Submitting this form Please email this form and attachments to:
Matters discussed and actions agreed from the meeting of the Partnership Executive Group, held on 5th September 2014 Present: MBW – Mark Burns-Williamson – Chair, OPCC AB – Andrew Battle – WYP TH – Tricia Holder – OPCC AS – Andrew Staniforth – WYFI KL – Kelly Laycock – OPCC TLN – Toby Lomax-Newton – OPCC EM – Eamon Mohon – WY YOT BM – Bill McHugh – WY CRC DW – Dave Walton – WY Fire & Rescue Authority GW – Gerry – CPS JR – Jason Roach – SK – Susan Kennedy – NOMS CM – Colin McMahon – LCJB NE – Neil Evans – City Council TT – Tom Tate – Victim Support CW – Chris Walsh – Kirklees CSP DS – David Smith – OPCC/VAL DC – Duncan Cooper – Public Health/OPCC FS – Fraser Sampson – OPCC JS – Jonathon Skinner – Police and Crime Panel CJ – Chris Jewesbury – Public Health SA – Sophie Abbott – OPCC Apologies: Robin Tuddenham, Susan Field, Martin Goldman, , Anita Parkin, Tony Reeves, Simon Pilling, Lesley Mclean. Item Purpose Outcome Actions 2 Actions of the last meeting held on 6 June 2014 Follow up on actions identified at the last meeting Actions are either completed, or for outstanding items an update is provided. Neighbourhood Mapping to be forward to next meeting Asylum item deferred from this agenda as Mike Greene not present - to be taken to next meeting
WY CSP Delivery Group Focus on taking forward the recommendations of the DIP review Review of governance arrangements and forthcoming victim support services budget was the focus of the last meeting. . 9. AOB Human Trafficking – Event Report DS discussed human trafficking. Asked for comments from PEG. RT showed support for this. Contributions to be emailed to DS. MGr would like to discuss Asylum at next meeting. Comments to be provided to DS at the OPCC Work with MGr to include Asylum at the next meeting
Access part 1 Continue – increase to a minimum of 13 appointments per 1000 patients daily Monday to Friday. Access part 2 Continue – decrease time commitment to 15 minutes per 1000 patients outside core hours. Practices to participate in the extended hours DES A+E x Exception Coding x Community Health MMR X Community Health X Community Health MDT Meetings Continue as part of the frail elderly scheme Phlebotomy Continue Shared Care Continue – amendments in year 2015/16 Drug Administration Continue. Remove the need for patient questionnaires – amendments in year 2015/16 Data Validation Continue with changes - Data Review Travellers/Gypsy Scheme Continue for 12 month period Practice improvement Goal X Frail Elderly x Identification and Care Planning EOL x SCHEDULE 2 – THE SERVICES Service Specifications
3.3 Population covered Patients in the final year of life regardless of residence e.g. care home, private home etc. registered with a Southport and Formby GP 3.4 Any acceptance and exclusion criteria and thresholds Patients 18+ and registered with a Southport and Formby GP Practice deemed to be in the final year of life (Min 0.3%, max 1% of registered population) Patients should be given the opportunity to have the conversation with regards to their care preferences in the final year of life (NOK/IMCA etc if there is no capacity). However, patients do not have to engage in a care planning process and may not participate. This choice is permitted and should be read coded. 3.5 Interdependence with services/providers Care Community matrons Community geriatrician District nurses Specialist palliative care nurses NWAS OOH provider/s Airedale hub (for care home residents) Jospice Secondary care This is not inclusive 4.1 Applicable national standards (eg NICE) More Care Less Pathway, A review of the Liverpool Care Pathway 2014
2 Frail / Elderly Quarterly information as requested Last working day of the financial quarter Annual Practice Report DATE 3 Identification and Care Planning in End of Life (EOL) Quarterly information as requested Last working day of the financial quarter Annual Practice Report DATE 4 Phlebotomy Quarterly Invoice Last working day of the financial quarter Patient satisfaction Report (20 random samples) DATE 5 Shared Care Quarterly Invoice Last working day of financial quarter 6 Drug Administration Quarterly Invoice Last working day of financial quarter 7 Data Review Agreement of 3 local/QIPP priorities for internal clinical peer review – report and clinical external review at locality meeting 8 Travellers / Gypsy Scheme Annual Practice Report DATE Quarters outlined above reflect financial quarters where invoices are required SIGNATURE Practices stating an intention to participate must complete and return this signature by DATE.
Total number of patients Number with a care plan Number without a care plan 100 20 80 Example New care plans = 70% (of 80) = 56 care plans Review of care = 30% (of 20)= 6 care plans 2) Completing Care Plans 2.1 Which Care Plan? SystmOne - Ardens Users SystmOne - Non Ardens Users EMIS Web Use the relevant condition specific templates to capture key information. Use the LTC review template to help you identify which condition specific plans the patient needs. Click on future care planning Click on Generic Care Plan (This is the foundation document) - make sure you select the code from the drop down box Click on Specific Care plan - this will take you to the plans for specific conditions Signpost patients (where appropriate) to self-management support on the Health in Herts webpages For end of life patients: Ask for consent to add information to the summary care record. Use the EPaCCS leaflet Further step by step guidance can be on the CCG website Continue to use the same Personal Care Plan that you used for 17/18 and have used in previous years as part of the avoiding unplanned admissions DES. Ensure patients are correctly coded with a GSF stage / Frailty code, where appropriate. Signpost patients (where appropriate) to support on the Health in Herts webpages. For end of life patients: Ask for consent to add information to the summary care record. Use the EPaCCS leaflet to explain how this works Continue to use the same Personal Care Plan that you used for 17/18 and have used in previous years as part of the avoiding unplanned admissions DES. Ensure patients are correctly coded with a GSF stage / Frailty code, where appropriate. Signpost patients (where appropriate) to support on the Health in Herts webpages. For end of life patients: Ask for consent to add information to the summary care record. Use the EPaCCS leaflet
Strong public and patient engagement Clear, clinical evidence base Support for proposals from commissioners Consistency with current and prospective need for patient choice Support for bed closures Proposals must also be affordable in capital and revenue terms. The CCGs have been able to provide a full response to this process outlining how they have complied with all five tests. They have has also been able to set out how the proposals are affordable and indeed how they would provide a much more effective use of resources than the current models of care and support. This response has been considered and NHSE have indicated assurance in principle for this work to proceed. This assurance is anticipated to progress to full sign off ahead of the decision making meeting. Details of the five tests are within Appendix 5 but key evidence is summarised below: 5.1 NHS England Assurance Test 1 The CCGs recognise responsibilities to ensure strong public and patient engagement and have delivered this through: Robust communications and engagement plan Clear stakeholder maps Robust governance through the Communications and Engagement sub-group Engaged VCS to carry out pre-engagement and consultation to facilitate access to seldom heard groups recognising population diversity Engaged Health Scrutiny, Health and Wellbeing Healthwatch and Partnership Boards, utilising existing networks to ensure wide dissemination. Used digital platforms and social media, including easy to understand visual aids and video Equality Impact Assessment and Transport Analysis completed Commissioned an independent organisation to undertake a review of the consultation and engagement process to act as a critical friend Undertaken full patient, public, staff and provider engagement 5.2 NHS England Assurance Test 2 The CCGs recognise that any service change proposals must be based upon a sound research and evidence base. Change clinically led with oversight from Exec and clinical lead for learning disabilities Research and literature review undertaken to inform the evidence base including seeking feedback from regional Learning Disability network and board, provider forums and partnership boards.
Appendix A Indicative minimum funding levels for 2015-15 Allowable Factor DfE Indicative amount £ NELC current amount £ per 2014-15 formula per pupil entitlement: Primary AWPU 2,845 3,213 (excludes additional one off payment of £75 per pupil). Basic per pupil entitlement: Secondary AWPU KS3 3,951 NELC chose one secondary AWPU value only (KS4) Basic per pupil entitlement: Secondary AWPU KS4 4,529 4,565 (excludes additional one off payment of £75 per pupil). Deprivation – FSM eligibility - Primary 893 Following discussions with the Schools Forum Formula Funding Working Party the decision was made not to use this factor as a measure of deprivation. Deprivation – FSM eligibility - Secondary 1,080 Following discussions with the Schools Formula Funding Working Party the decision was made not to use this factor as a measure of deprivation. Deprivation – IDACI 1 Primary 237 142 Deprivation – IDACI 2 Primary 290 296 Deprivation – 3 Primary 387 450 Deprivation – 4 Primary 453 604 Deprivation – 5 Primary 511 759 Deprivation – 6 Primary 741 913 Deprivation – IDACI 1 Secondary 321 154 Deprivation – IDACI 2 Secondary 243 308 Deprivation – IDACI 3 Secondary 530 462
Deprivation – IDACI 4 Secondary 596 616 Deprivation – IDACI 5 Secondary 659 770 Deprivation – 6 Secondary 894 924 Looked After Children - Primary 1,009 Following discussions with the Schools Formula Funding Working Party the decision was made not to use this factor Looked After Children - Secondary 1,009 Following discussions with the Schools Forum Formula Funding Working Party the decision was made not to use this factor Low cost high incident SEN - Primary 878 892 Low cost high incident SEN - Secondary 1,961 1050 English as an additional language - Primary 505 Following discussions with the Schools Formula Funding Working Party the decision was made not to use this factor English as an additional language - Secondary 1,216 Following discussions with the Schools Forum Formula Funding Working Party the decision was made not to use this factor Lump Sum - Primary 117,082 102,000 Lump Sum - Secondary 128,189 102,000 Sparsity factor - Primary 53,988 tapered 100,000 tapered Sparsity factor - Secondary 53,988 tapered N/A
Paul Fieldhouse (PF) - Chief Pharmacist & Clinical Lead for Medicines Optimisation (NLaG) (Chair) Paulash Haider (PH) - Procurement Pharmacist (NLaG) John Harper (JH) – Care Plus Group representing Sarah Spooner Gemma McNally (GM) – Strategic Lead Pharmacist (NECS) Hazel Tait (HT) - Assistant Contracts Manager (NLaG) Rachel Staniforth (RS) – Senior Pharmacist, East Lincolnshire (NECS) Margaret North East Lincolnshire Community Representative for Prescribing Dr Chathley, General Practitioner (North East Lincs) Jim Devlin (JD) – Medicines and Therapeutics Committee Chairman (NLaG) Neveen Samuel (NS) – Prescribing Lead for North Lincolnshire CCG In Attendance: Joanne Rowson, Pharmacy Secretary (NLaG) 2 Apologies Apologies were received from: Elizabeth Barron (EB) – RDash Janet Clark (JC) – LPC Pharmacist Representative Dr Kasaraneni (KK) – Local Medical Committee Andy Karvot (AK) – Consultant Pharmacist Antimicrobials (NLaG) Eddie McCabe (EMc) – Assistant Director Finance, Contracts & Procurement (NECS) Sue Peckett – Deputy Chief Nurse (NLaG) Dr Ramesh, General Practitioner (North East Lincs) Sarah Spooner (SS) – Clinical Lead Care Plus Group 3 Declarations of Pecuniary Interest There were no declarations of financial interest. 4 Minutes of Previous Meeting and Matters Arising The minutes of the previous meeting held on 9 February 2017 were as read and accepted as a true record. Matters Arising Professional Secretary Update – The new professional Secretary will commence on 20 April 2017. Emollient Recommendations – not discussed. Updates to Primary Care Antibiotic Guidance – Email Information from AK - As discussed by telephone, Rachel, Abid Ali (works with Gemma and Rachel) and I met and agreed to update the local (North Lincolnshire APC) “Guidance on the Treatment and Management of Infection in Primary Care” document, as per the APC draft agenda, Matters Arising, v. according to the national Public Health England, January 2017 update of the same document.
528 CORPORATE RISK REGISTER, NHSFBD - Public Health Directorate Risk Register 05/04/2007 NHS Fife Board NHS Fife is unprepared to respond to an influenza pandemic and put healthcare of the population at unnecessary risk. Moderate Risk Previous updates removed to notepad. Summary of Risk Our Pandemic planning arrangements are under ongoing continual review and it is expected that any learning gained from the exercises above will be incorporated into current guidance. The risk level was discussed as part of a risk preparedness assessment workshop held on the 24th and 29th of April and it was agreed that the local risk assessment for pandemic flu remains at HIGH in line with the Scottish and National Governments risk assessments. George Brown Emergency Planning Officer UPDATE: 280115: Risk reviewed at SMT050115. Risk Owner Dr E Coyle reported that Pandemic Flu is a VERY HIGH risk on the UK Government National Risk Register. This coupled with the potential severity and unpredictability of an outbreak of pandemic flu and its effect on NHS Fife and the local population means we must retain the focus on our pandemic planning and the risk should remain on the Corporate Risk Register.SMT agreed. PAC. Extreme possible High Risk Moderate unlikely Low Risk Edward Coyle 29/10/2014 30/04/2015 Staff Governance Committee BSC2.08 Safe and Person Centred Current Risk Level Moderate = 6 526 CORPORATE RISK REGISTER 11/07/2007 Corporate Directorates Legionella Precautions: There is a risk that Legionella bacteria in hospital systems could cause illness to people resulting in their harm and action by the enforcing authority. Moderate Risk Management process continues to be employed in managing the possible Legionella risk in NHS Fife**All updates removed to notepad** UPDATE: 280115: Risk reviewed at SMT 5th & 12th January 2015. Risk J Leiper reported the current position for this risk is stable and controlled. It was felt however that corporate oversight is important. SMT agreed to retain the risk on the CORPRR. PAC. Major unlikely Moderate Risk Major remote Low Risk Jim Leiper 24/02/2015 24/02/2016 Health & Safety Governance Committee BSC 2.05 Safe agency
Appendix A Summary Results of EFA findings on Local Authority Schools funding formula Allowable Factor EFA Summary Finding NELC position Basic per pupil entitlement: Primary AWPU 81% of AWPU’s fall within the range of £2,500 to £3,250. Primary AWPU = £3,325 (includes £111 one off adjustment). Basic per pupil entitlement: Secondary AWPU KS3 KS3 - 81% of AWPU’s fall within the range of £3,500 to £4,500. NELC chose one secondary AWPU value only, £4,676 (includes £111 one off adjustment). Basic per pupil entitlement: Secondary AWPU KS4 KS4 - 79% of AWPU’s fall within the range of £4,000 to £5,000. NELC one secondary AWPU value only, £4,676 (includes £111 one off adjustment) % Funding through basic entitlement Ranges from 61 – 88%. Half of LA’s allocate between 75% – 80%. NELC % = 81.9%. Deprivation - % of funding Most frequent % band between 4% – 6%. Across all authority’s 8.1% of funding is allocated through this factor. However the range is from 1% to 21%. NELC % = 6.41%. Following discussions with the Schools Forum Formula Funding Working Party the decision around the methodology and % was re-affirmed. Looked After Children Optional factor – used by 88 out of 152 authority’s. Following discussions with the Schools Formula Funding Working Party the decision was re-affirmed not to use this factor. Low cost high incident SEN (Prior attainment) Most frequent % chosen between 2% – 6% (68% of LA’s). Across all authority’s 4.4% of funding is allocated through this factor. NELC % = 5.30% English as an additional language Optional factor – used by 132 out of 152 authority’s Following discussions with the Schools Formula Funding Working Party the decision was re-affirmed not to use this factor. Mobility Optional factor – used by 66 out of 152 authority’s Following discussions with the Schools Forum Formula Funding Working Party the decision was
areas are: quality and safety, finance, operations and governance The Board is satisfied that the systems and/or processes referred to in paragraph 4 should include but not be restricted to systems and/or processes to ensure: (a) That there is sufficient capability at Board level to provide effective organisational leadership on the quality of care provided; (b) That the Board’s planning and processes take timely and appropriate account of quality of care considerations; (c) The collection of accurate, comprehensive, timely and up to date information on quality of care; (d) That the Board receives and takes into account accurate, comprehensive, timely and up to date information on quality of care; (e) That the Trust, including its Board, Yes The Board has substantial oversight of the quality and safety of care within the organisation receiving detailed reports from management, which is supported by oversight and scrutiny by a dedicated Board Committee (the Quality and Safety Committee). Quality and Safety are at the centre of the organisation’s thinking and in terms of assurance this is very evident in the Trust’s quality report, operational plan and annual report making
Deprivation – IDACI Primary Band F Band E Band D Band C Band B Band A Secondary Band F Band E Band D Band C Band B Band A 150 175 400 575 900 1100 250 275 500 675 1000 1200 150 200 350 500 600 700 250 300 450 725 800 800 Low Attainment Primary Secondary 1,109 956 1,109 956 EAL 220 220 Sparsity (max) Primary Middle Secondary/All Through 13,000 52,000 60,000 13,000 52,000 60,000 PFI - 0.163 De-delegation (Primary and Secondary): FSM Eligibility (by FSM) Behaviour Support (by FSM) EAL Trades Union Facility Time (by AWPU) Contingency (by AWPU) 6 97 220 3 20 6 97 220 3 20
Panel Member Roles July 2015 Panel Priority What this means in practice Panel Lead Information sources Performance Scrutiny of Force performance Crime data integrity Progress against recommendations in HMIC inspection reports Community Conversation survey amendments Mr Roger Grasby Cllr Hassan Khan OPCC performance report iQuanta PEEL inspection HMIC inspection reports Complaints Liaison with officers re: recording / reviewing complaints Feedback to Members re:status of complaints Chair of Complaints Sub Committee Complaints Oversight (formerly Crawford Review) Cllr Alan Wassell Complainant information Elected Local Policing Bodies (Complaints and Misconduct) Regulations 2012 IPCC guidance ‘Tone from the Top’ Leadership, Ethics and Accountability in Policing Strategic Policing Requirement General oversight of the SPR and its impact on WYP, in particular, the budget Child Sexual Exploitation Counter-terrorism Mrs Jo Sykes Cllr Mohammed Iqbal Strategic Policing Requirement HMIC Inspection reports Police and Crime Plan Monitoring the outcomes within the Police and Crime Plan Working with the Commissioner to develop his refresh of the Plan Engaging with CSPs and Scrutiny Panels Cllr Phil Cllr Amanda Carter Police and Crime Plan JSIAs from each District Local Perspectives Survey results from each District PCC’s Annual Report Finance / Service Transformation In depth consideration of PCC’s precept proposal along with nominated Finance lead from Local Authority Monitoring the outcomes from the £20m Transformation Fund Cllr Michael Cllr Steve Pullen PCC’s Budget Precept commitments Transformation Fund projects / evaluation Panel Member Roles July 2015 Panel Priority What this means in practice Panel Lead Information sources
Contaminated item clearance permit Permit ref. (optional): School or service name: Permit issued to: Person responsible for the items: Location of items (e.g. room): Details of Description (make, model, function etc.): Serial number (s) Person who completed this permit (item owner): I confirm that the details contained in this permit are accurate Signed: …………………………Print: …………………… Position: ………..……................Date: ………………….. School or service representative issuing this permit (e.g. RPS, SSA, PI, lab manager). The RPS should also sign where radioactive contamination was a hazard. The ultimate responsibility for compliance is determined by the health and safety management hierarchy for the area (e.g. Head of School). I have issued the above permit and ensured that the necessary decontamination procedures have been taken to allow the items to leave the hazardous area. However, additional control measures have been described for handling the items where complete decontamination has not been possible. Signed: …………………………Print: …………………………. Date: …………….. Please make sure that items are stored such that they are not exposed to further contamination before hand-over Competent person carrying out or leading the (e.g. Sustainability, contractor) You should read the information contained in this permit and discuss any details that you do not understand or that give you cause for concern with the persons named above in box 3 or 4. You should ensure that any information and control measures specified for handling the items covered by this permit are incorporated into your own risk assessments and operating procedures.
DRAFT CALENDAR Waiver Process Example Special Permission Reason Circumstances Time Frame to Apply Employee Special Permission Parent or guardian works at a Chesterfield County Public school and would like to have their child attend their school. The parent will provide transportation to and from school. There must be sufficient capacity. 15 (Note, only parents who work at a school where they wish to bring their student(s) may apply starting March 1, otherwise, the parent should apply beginning April 1) August
Special Permission Parent or guardian like their child to attend a school with available space outside of the school boundary, which serves their current Chesterfield residence. The parent will provide transportation to and from school. There must be sufficient capacity. April 15 *YRS - This seems to be the category in which parents would request that younger siblings of students at secondary schools with a traditional calendar would apply to attend an elementary school in the secondary school’s feeder pattern (SD) Family Relocation (Move-In) Parent or guardian is currently residing in Chesterfield County, but is building, buying, or will rent a home where the student will reside during the school year in Year Round* (you will need to register your child at the school that serves your current attendance August
Chesterfield County, and would like their child to start at the school which serves their future residence. There must be sufficient capacity in the requested grade for students. zone and then fill out a and provide proof of a pending lease or settlement date which occurs during the school year. Family Relocation Parent or guardian moves out of the school zone (still within Chesterfield County) where their student started the school year and would like their child to finish the school year at the same school. The parent will provide transportation to and from that school. ONLY during the current school year June 1* CLICK FOR MOVES WHICH OCCUR AFTER 8/24/17 Special Permission on-line request form: Please carefully review each reason for requesting permission to attend a school outside your current residence before making your selection:
Human Trafficking, U.S. Homeland Security Online Training and Resources X X X Exploited Crimes – Online Training X X X Million Kids, Trainings, & Preventive Education – Online Training X X X Indicators of Human Trafficking - Blue Campaign (DHS) – Online Training X X ImPACT Virginia, Trainings, Legislation, VA Resources, Events, Advocacy – Online Resources and Face-to-Face Training Events X X X Trauma & Hope, LLC, Specialized Mental Health Provider & Training - Online and Face-to-Face Training and Consultations X X Virginia Department of Social Services, Mandated Reporting Training & Resources – Online Training X X Look Beneath the Surface, Office on Trafficking in Persons – Online Training X X What is Human Trafficking? The United States Department of Justice – Online Training X X
Human Trafficking: The Reality, the Scope, and the Consequences, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit – Online Training X X Indicators of Trafficking - Blue Campaign (DHS) – Online Training X X Books and Publications Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services, X X X X Seduced, The Grooming of America’s Teenagers, Xulon Press, Book X X X Not in My Town: Exposing and Ending Human Trafficking & Modern Day Slavery by Dillon Burroughs and Charles Powell (2011) New Hope Publishers, Book X X X Human Trafficking Around the World: Hidden in Plain Sight by Stephanie Hepburn and Rita J. Simon (2013) Columbia University Press, Book X X X Identify and Assist a Trafficking Victim, U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Public Affairs – Online Publication X X X Human Trafficking of Children in the United States: A Fact Sheet for Schools, US Department of Education – Fact Sheet X X X
The Facts: What is Sex Trafficking and How Widespread Is It? Focus on the Family Online Information/Resources X X X Trafficking of Women and Children for Sexual Exploitation in the Americas Women, Health and Development Program Pan-American Health Organization, Alison Phinney – Online Publication X X Virginia Office of the Attorney General: Human Trafficking X X Internet Safety, Southern Virginia Internet Crimes Against Children – Online Resources X X Project Safe Childhood, US Department of Justice – Online Resources X X Virginia Department of Health Locator, Victim Services Resource – Information Directory X Southern Virginia Internet Crimes Against Children – Online Information/Resources X STREET Ransom In the News, Straight Street Ministry – Religious – Online Information/Resources X
Mechanical Certified Drafter Examination (also listed in and Industrial Education) American Design Drafting Association (ADDA) Mechanical Drafting and Design Assessment National Occupational Competency Testing Institute (NOCTI) Modeling and Simulation Certification Examination National Center for Simulation Performing Arts Assessment (also listed in and Industrial Education) National Occupational Competency Testing Institute (NOCTI) Pre-Engineering Certification Examinations Robotics Education Competition (REC) Foundation- Hostedware Corporation Pre-Engineering/Engineering Technology Assessment National Occupational Competency Testing Institute (NOCTI) Project Lead the Way Tests (Pass any one end-of-course test) Project Lead The Way Robotics and Automation Examination SkillsUSA Robotics Certification Examinations Robotics Education Competition (REC) Foundation- Hostedware Corporation Spatial Projects And Community Exchange (SPACE) Examination Digital Inc. Spatial Technology and Remote Sensing (STARS) Certification Examination Digital Quest, Inc. Technical Drafting Examination SkillsUSA Technical Theater Assessment (also listed in and Industrial Education) National Occupational Competency Testing Institute Unity Certified Developer Examination Unity Technologies
“Insert Item Title” Agenda Item xx for The “Insert Name of Board/Committee” Meeting (xx/1#) of xx xxxx 201# From: “Insert Name of Division/Unit/Office of Submission Officer Role Title” Recommendation: That “insert recommendation(s) Committee/Board is required to consider” Issue “Insert the issue(s) that warrant this item being presented to the Committee/Board” Background and Considerations “Insert the background and considerations relating to this matter” Risk Identification and Mitigation “insert outline of identified risks and mitigation implications of this proposal” Resource Implications Financial: “Financial Implications” Staffing: “Staffing Implications” Sustainability (environmental, social, economic and cultural): “Sustainability Implications” Consultation “insert the name or names of Faculty, Division or others that have been consulted in regard to this matter” Attachments “Insert name of attachment” Requests for Further Information Requests may be directed to “insert title”
 Exceeds  Meets  Partially Meets  Falls Far Below Criteria APR CMCS Gateway Webster PCSS Sizer Faithfulness to Charter 1. Mission and Key Design Elements  Meets  Exceeds  Meets  Meets  Meets  Meets 2. Access and Equity   Meets  Meets  Meets  Meets  Partially Meets 3. Compliance  Meets   Meets   Meets  Partially Meets 4. Dissemination  Meets  Meets  Exceeds  Exceeds  Meets  Meets Academic Program Success 5. Student Performance Level: 2 Percentile: 57th Level: 2 Percentile: 64th Level: Insufficient Data Percentile: Insufficient Data Level: Insufficient Data Percentile: Insufficient Data Level: 1 Percentile: 93rd Level: 1 Percentile: 40th Viability 9. Governance  Meets  Meets  Partially Meets  Partially Meets  Meets  Intended Commissioner Action Unconditional Renewal Unconditional Renewal Unconditional Renewal Unconditional Renewal Unconditional Renewal Renewal with Conditions
Level 5 Schools 2015–16 Quarter 2 Report: Morgan Full Service Community School School Information Student Enrollment and Demographics Location Holyoke, Massachusetts SY 2015–16 Enrollment Current Status Level 5 Percentage SWDs Receiver Name Dr. Stephen Zrike Percentage ELLs Year Designated Level 5 2013 Percentage Year Designated 4 2010 Percentage Latino/Hispanic Grade Span PK–8 Percentage Asian Number of Full-Time Staff in SY 2015–16 58 Percentage White Percentage Multirace Priority Areas Priority Area 1: Recruitment and development of professional talent. Priority Area 2: Systems to support professional learning and responsiveness in practice. Priority Area 3: Creating a Center of Excellence for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Priority Area 4: Targeted and aligned resources. Priority Area 5: Enhancing and sustaining family and community engagement. Content provided by Superintendent Stephen Zrike Executive Summary Staffing and Leadership Support: Morgan Full Service Community School (Morgan) was fully staffed by mid-October 2015, with the middle school schedule restructured so all students receive daily science and social studies instruction. In light of the resignation of the Dean of Instruction in October, the district is partnering with SchoolWorks to provide coaching and support around instructional improvement to Morgan administration, academic coaches, and teachers. The school also has begun an intensive partnership with the district’s Teaching and Learning Team, creating an opportunity for all Morgan teachers to consistently receive individualized feedback. Instruction: The school has refocused on the use of the Curriculum for literacy instruction in grades K–4, and organized intensive professional development to support its implementation. The daily targeted skills instruction (“intervention”) block was reorganized, with the decision to focus on literacy in K–5 and the integration of Lexia Core 5 to support individualized, customized skill development; grades 6–8 developed specific interventions based on student instructional needs in ELA, mathematics, and science. Morgan teachers used ANet data to identify strengths and weaknesses and plan reteaching in ELA and mathematics.
KIPP Lynn Charter School Lynn (located) 850 5-12 Add grades K-4; increase enrollment from 850 to 1,586 seats (+736) Helen Y. Davis Leadership Academy Charter Public School (Formerly Smith Leadership Academy) Boston (located) 216 6-8 Add grades K-5; add grades 9-12; increase enrollment from 216 to 752 seats (+536); become districts: Avon; Braintree; Brockton; Brookline; Cambridge; Chelsea; Holbrook; Lynn; Milton; Quincy; Randolph; Revere; Somerville; and Stoughton Mystic Valley Regional Charter School Everett Malden (located) Medford Melrose Stoneham Wakefield 1,500 K-12 Increase enrollment from 1,500 to 1,900 seats (+400) Pioneer Charter School of Science Chelsea Everett (located) Revere 360 7-12 Add grades K-6; increase enrollment from 360 to 780 (+420) Salem Academy Charter School (located) 372 6-12 Increase enrollment from 372 to 480 seats (+108) UP Academy Charter School of Boston (Horace Mann) Boston (located) 500 6-8 Increase enrollment from 500 to 540 seats (+40)
WPRTA vehicle. This revision does not include a rate change. Costs associated with the removal are the responsibility of the advertiser. Staff requested that the Board approve the changes as presented. Mr. Eubanks made a motion to approve the changes as presented. Mr. Hight seconded the motion and it was approved by a unanimous vote. Upcoming Courtesy Transportation – Ms. Sterling updated the Board on Promotional (Special Courtesy) Service and Governmental Courtesy Service as follows: FY 2013 Service Date Description Anticipated # Served Estimated # of Hours Growing a Green Future (Salt Block) Hickory April 20, 2013 Citizens of Catawba County 100 6 Earth Day 2013, Morganton April 20,2013 Citizens of Burke County 100 6 Unity Fair, Hickory May 2013 Citizens of Hickory 100 8 FY 2014 Service Date Description Anticipated # Served Estimated # of Hours City Wide Hickory Sept. 2013 One day festival @ Mostellar Mansion 500 8 Folk Festival Oct. 6, 2013 Sherrills Ford, NC 500 16 Oktoberfest, Hickory Oct. 2013 Downtown Hickory 500 10 Taylorsville Apple Festival Oct. 2013 Main Street/Taylorsville 200 10 Burke Monster Oct. 2013 Race Shuttle Service 150 16 FY 2013 Govt Courtesy Service Date Description Anticipated # Served Estimated # of Hours Foothills Higher Education Center (FHEC) April 8-12, 2013 Shuttle from FHEC to/from Area Motels 120 per day 10 FY 2014 Govt Courtesy Service Date Description Anticipated # Served Estimated # of Hours Foothills Higher Education Center (FHEC) August 2013 Shuttle from FHEC to/from Area Motels 120 per day 10 Newton 101 August 2013 Shuttle Newton 101 class participants 25 5 Foothills Higher Education Center (FHEC) October 2013 Shuttle from FHEC to/from Area Motels 120 per day 10 League of Municipalities TBD (Oct) Hickory Metro Convention Center TBD TBD This is informational only; no action is needed at this time. Further updates will be provided as needed. Free Fare Day on April 22 - Staff is requesting a free fare day on the fixed route buses on Earth Day, Monday, April 22, 2013. Greenway has traditionally offered free fares on this day to customers on the bus systems fixed
Level 5 Schools 2016–17 Quarter 1 Report: UP Academy Holland School Information Student Enrollment and Demographicsa Location Boston, Massachusetts Total SY 2016–17 Enrollment 809 Current Status Level 5 Percentage Economically Disadvantaged 64% Receiver Name UP Education Network Percentage High Needs 82% Percentage SWDs 15% Year Designated Level 5 2013 Percentage ELLs 37% Percentage Black 42% Year Designated Level 4 2010 Percentage Latino/Hispanic 41% Grade Span PK–5 Percentage Asian 4% Number of Full-Time Staff in SY 2016–17 86 Percentage White 4% Percentage Multirace 9% Priority Areas Priority Area 1: Transform the culture of the school into a culture of urgency, high expectations, accountability, excellence, and achievement. Priority Area 2: Enhance the of the curricula, improve the effectiveness of instruction, and strengthen the utilization of assessment data. Priority Area 3: Expand the school day and school year, build in time, deploy resources, develop programs, and create identification and tracking systems to ensure that all students, especially students with disabilities and English language learners, receive the academic and other supports they require to learn and succeed. Priority Area 4: Recruit and hire extraordinary leaders, teachers, and support staff, and build and utilize systems to evaluate, develop, promote, reward, and retain this staff over the long term. Priority Area 5: Fully engage all of the school’s families in the learning of their children. a Student demographic data, including percentages of students with disabilities (SWDs) and English language learners (ELLs) is from the 2015–16 school year (SY 2015–16) due to the movement of students at the start of the school year. These data will be updated to reflect the 2016–17 school year (SY 2016–17) in Quarter 2 reports. Content provided by UP Education Network Executive Summary The UP Academy Holland leadership team identified a number of schoolwide goals designed to further reinforce a calm and joyful school culture and to accelerate student learning in the upcoming 2016–17 school year. These schoolwide goals fall into three categories: teacher development, routinizing schoolwide systems (i.e., arrival, morning meeting, dismissal, closing circles), and intentionally developing self-advocacy and emotional self-regulation among
Engage legal counsel to review and amend, as necessary, the articles of organization, by-laws, and/or other governing documents of the Brooke School Foundation to reflect the charter consolidation N/A FINANCE Engage independent auditor to advise on any necessary actions to consolidate financial accounting, including the general ledger and chart of accounts. N/A COO Upon Approval April 2016 Review fiscal policies and procedures manual, and revise to reflect charter consolidation and any other necessary changes N/A COO Upon Approval April 2016 Notify primary banking institution, review bank accounts and make any necessary changes N/A COO Upon Approval March 2016 Assess purchasing system and procedures, identify improvements and protocols for engaging vendors at each campus and network-wide N/A COO September 2015 April 2016 Review all current and future potential contracts and agreements with external vendors to identify possible economies of scale to be achieved N/A COO September 2015 April 2016 Direct HR & Finance Mgr. to notify vendors and contractors regarding the consolidation, as needed N/A COO Upon Approval June 2016 Consult with insurance broker to identify any necessary revisions that may be required to existing and future insurance policies N/A COO Upon Approval June 2016 Notify lenders and related financial institutions/organizations of the charter consolidation; consult with legal counsel regarding any necessary changes to financing instruments, loans, or operating agreements N/A COO Upon Approval June 2016 Consult with DESE to make any necessary changes, or prepare for future alignment, of federal pass-through grants (including, I, Title IIA, Grant 240 SPED) N/A Assoc. Dir. Fin. & Ops. Upon Approval May 2016 RESOURCES Consult with payroll provider and make necessary adjustments to reflect charter consolidation N/A Assoc. Dir. Fin. & Ops. Upon Approval March 2016 Consult with Massachusetts Teachers’ Retirement System (MTRS) to identify and implement any necessary steps to reflect charter consolidation N/A Assoc. Dir. Fin. & Ops. Upon Approval 2016 Update the Handbook and other Human Resource documents to reflect language consistent with the charter consolidation N/A COO Upon Approval March 2016 Coordinate with HR consultant to notify benefits providers of the charter consolidation, and make any necessary modifications to agreements or processes N/A COO Upon Approval March 2016 STUDENT ENROLLMENT AND RECRUITMENT
Underlying Budgetary Assumptions for Year 1 Cost FY16 – line 15 1 Secretary added $40,000 FY16 – line 32 4 Regular, 1 SPED, 1 ELL Teacher added $240,000 FY16 – line 33 1 Adjsutment counselor and Full time Dean of Academics added. Curriculum supervisor will start work full time instead of 0.6 FTE. $114,500 FY16 – line 34 2 Paraprofessional added $48,000 FY16 – line 35 1 full time Assistant of Dean of Academics added $34,000 FY16 – line 37 1 Computer lab added $15,000 FY16 – line 38 Textbooks addded for new students $34,200 FY15 – line 42 Saturday school, After school tutorings, Summer tutorings included FY15 – line 45 Extra curriculum activities, FY16 – line 49 1 Bus added $52,598 FY16 – line 64 Including 3 smartboard, 90 new student desk, 4 Teacher desk, chair, board , New art&Music class furnitures&equipments $79,810 Underlying Budgetary Assumptions for Year 2 FY17 – line 32 3 Teacher added- Math, Science, ELA $120,000 FY17 – line 34 1 Paraprofessional added $24,000 FY17 – line 38 Including new science lab materials $27,500 FY17 – line 64 Science lab furniture&Equipment and 1 smartboard 30 new student desk, Teacher chair, desk, board added $47,570 Underlying Budgetary Assumptions for Year 3 FY18 – line 32 1 Teacher added- Humanities $40,000 FY18 – line 49 1 Bus added $52,598 FY18 – line 64 30 new student desk, 1 teacher desk, chair, table added $12,570 Note: Transportation reimbursement rate %60 Note II: Payroll Tax and fringe benefit calculated based on number of staff Note III: Per pupil tuition is entitled $12,037 for following 3 years.
Attachment D: HCSS 2013-2014 Parent Survey 1 HCSS has a friendly and welcoming atmosphere. 2 HCSS is supportive of parents, and concerns are handled in a timely manner. Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree 141 54 17 6 6 138 50 20 10 6 3 I am pleased with the academic progress of my student. 4 There is a level of respect between students and staff at HCSS. Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree 132 59 20 8 5 130 55 26 5 8 5 HCSS prepares students to do well on classroom, district, and assessments. 6 My student is given challenging work at HCSS. Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Strongly Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree 135 60 17 6 6 137 68 12 3 4 7 My student is able to get extra help if needed. 8 I understand the and expectations for my student's behavior. Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree 133 63 16 6 6 142 62 11 2 7
Appendix 1: Early Help Hub contacts – version 1st September 2014 Hub Manager Hub address Consultation line (not to be given to parents) venue Weekly allocation meeting Eastleigh Alden 21.01.14 02380 624728 Chamberlayne Children's Centre, Chamberlayne Road, Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JL Wednesday 1000 - 1200 Gosport Steph Morley 28.04.14 02392 572677 Rowner Children's Centre, Nimrod Dr, Gosport, Hampshire PO13 8AA Tuesday 0930-1200 Test Valley Julie Lawrence 19.05.14 01264 387453 Meadow Children's Centre, Old London Rd, Stockbridge, Hampshire SO20 6EJ (consultation line not from there currently) Thursday 1300 - 1500 Basingstoke Rebekah Kundi 02.06.14 01256 776146 Pebbles Children's Centre, Shakespeare Road, Popley, Basingstoke, Thursday 0930 - 1130
Hampshire RG24 9BP Hart & Rushmoor Wraith 16.06.14 01252 796324 Rushmoor Borough Council, Farnborough Rd, Farnborough, Hampshire GU14 7JU Tuesday 1300 - 1500 New Forest Cusack 07.07.14 627735 Cadland Children's Centre, Whitefield Road, Holbury, Southampton SO45, 2HW Thursday 0930 - 1130 Havant Andy Kennedy 08.09.14 023 9247 5503 Public Service Plaza Civic Centre Road Havant PO9 2AX Wednesday 0930 - 1130 East Hants Sharon Davies tbc – 03.11.14 Work flow not switched locality to early help yet Fareham Steph Morley tbc 10.11.14 Work flow not switched locality to help yet Winchester Julie Alden tbc 17.11.14 Work flow not switched locality to early help yet
Number of help assessments completed 20 assessments completed Length of time open to the hub The hub as been operational for 2 months Who is making the request for support to Level 3 Majority from Schools & school nurses. Also health visitors, Reason for request for support Parenting support (majority), mental health issues, substance misuse, self harm Re-entry to level 3 hub from level 2 when stepped down in past None Number of cases stepped up from level 3 to 4 Two 1 was attempted but MASH didn’t feel it was level 4 and came back to the hub, the other has escalated to R&A for an assessment Number of cases stepped down from level 4 to 3 21 families (44 children) Who is undertaking the role of Early help Coordinator Locality FSW’S, Children Centre FSW’s, Stoneham workers, School Nurses, CAMHS workers, Domestic Abuse outreach workers, schools Number of cases at level 2 being supported by level 3 20 calls into consultation line. Calls have come from different professionals including, schools, health visitors, school nurses, Voluntary services. Majority have been from schools and health services. Support has been to suggest a referral to CRT and or signposting to agencies. Distance travelled data As yet we have no data Feedback from the family As yet we don’t have any data HART & RUSHMOOR 16.6.14 – 31.7.14 Measure Comment Number of families being worked with at level 3 28 families have been discussed at EEH meetings = 63 children Number of help assessments completed 3 Early Help Assessments have been heard We have had two EH assessments from health visitors and one from a school. Unfortunately they were not of good quality in