AF And Whether your Orator did or not indorse the same and deliver it to the said JH in the said Defendant's presence And Whether the said JH did or not afterwards apply at the Cash Office of the Bank of NSW to get the said Note discounted And Whether for the reasons before stated the same was not discounted And Whether the said FW did or not take upon himself to discount such Note out of the funds of the Bank entrusted to his charge and did or not deposit the same amongst the other Bank Securities and did or not about the time such Note became due cause the same to be presented by the Bank Messenger to D for payment And Whether he was not required to pay the same And Whether the said Defendant did not in Company with the said Bank Messenger come to your Orator respecting the same And Whether your Orator did not feel surprized the said Defendant should attempt to look to him for Payment and did not their (sic) observe he had nothing to do with the
Frederick Garling to William Ch Wentworth. 5 April 1826 rule for change of solicitor. Demurrer filed 2 Oct 1826. The D by protestation not confessing or acknowledging all or any of the matters or things in the said Complainants bill to be true in such manner and form as the same are therein set forth and alledged doth demur thereto and for cause of demurrer sheweth that the said C hath not in and by his said bill made or stated such a case as doth or ought entitle him to any such discovery or relief as is thereby sought and prayed for from or against this D wherefore this D demands the judgment of this Honorable Court whether he shall be compelled to make any further or other answer to the said bill or any of the matters and things therein contained and prays to be hence dismissed with his reasonable costs in this behalf sustained WC Wentworth WC Wentworth Defendants Solicitor Friday 22 June 1827 draft rule to dissolve injunction. Certificate that on 1 August 1827 ordered that injunction obtained by ptff restraining deft's proceedings at law for the matters in question in this cause until the deft should answer the ptff's bill be absolutely dissolved and there have not been any other proceedings in this cause since the date of the
and Chattels were to be subject and entitled to the Equity of Redemption of the same upon payment of the said Sum of L1000 with Interest by the said WJ and JJ to your orator within three Calendar months from the date of the now reciting Deed And Your Orator further complaining to this HC that the said Mortgage to the said DW for the said sum of L205 in the said Deed mentioned has as your orator has been informed and believes been sold assigned released Transferred or in some way made over to Mrs Mary Saunders hereinafter mentioned the Mother in Law of the said JJ but for what Consideration or in what manner your orator is not sufficiently informed to set forth to this HC And your orator further sheweth unto this HC that by a Certain Instrument in writing and under the respective hands and seals of your orator and the said WJ and JJ bearing date the said fifteenth day of January 1814 after reciting the said herein before in part recited Mortgage It is agreed and
or proprietor thereof in the said Certificate of Registry And whether your orator had any knowledge of or ever gave his Consent thereto and whether the said Schooner was not shortly afterwards exposed to sale by public auction and whether your Orator did not attend such sale both privately and by his agents and did not give public notice that the Schooner was mortgaged to (p12) your Orator as aforesaid or how otherwise and whether notwithstanding such public notice so given by your orator and his Agents as aforesaid the said Schooner was not purchased by one George Chartris for a considerable and what Sum and whether the said George Chartris did not obtain possession of the said Schooner accordingly And whether the said George Chartris did not dispose of the said Schooner to Mr George Crossley and whether Mr George Crossley did not dispose of the said Schooner to Mrs Mary Reiby and whether the said Schooner is not now in her possession or how