zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Use navigation mechanisms in a consistent manner. And if you use tables (Priority 2) Yes No N/A Do not use tables for layout unless the table makes sense when linearized. Otherwise, if the table does not make sense, provide an alternative equivalent (which may be a linearized version). If a table is used for layout, do not use any structural markup for the purpose of visual formatting. And if you use frames (Priority 2) Yes No N/A Describe the purpose of frames and how frames relate to each other if it is not obvious by frame titles alone. And if you use forms (Priority 2) Yes No N/A Until user agents support explicit associations between labels and form controls, for all form controls with implicitly associated labels, ensure that the label is properly positioned. Associate labels explicitly with their controls. And if you use applets and scripts (Priority 2) Yes No N/A For scripts and applets, ensure that event handlers are input device-independent. Until user agents allow users to freeze moving content, avoid movement in pages. Make programmatic elements such as scripts and applets directly accessible or compatible with assistive technologies [Priority 1 if functionality is important and not presented elsewhere, otherwise Priority 2.] Ensure that any element that has its own interface can be operated in a manner. For scripts, specify logical event handlers rather than device-dependent event handlers. Priority 3 checkpoints In General (Priority 3) Yes No N/A
Content of the decision The lead applicants will be informed in writing of the Contracting Authority’s decision concerning their application and, if rejected, the reasons for the negative decision. This letter will be sent by e-mail and will appear online automatically in the PROSPECT profile of the user who submitted the application. Lead applicants who, in exceptional cases (see section 2.2), had to submit their application by post or hand-delivery, will be informed by email or by post if they did not provide any e-mail address. Therefore, please check regularly your PROSPECT profile, taking into account the indicative timetable below. An applicant believing that it has been harmed by an error or irregularity during the award process may lodge a complaint. See further section 2.4.15 of the Practical Guide. Indicative timetable DATE TIME 1. Information meeting, if any (local time) Not Applicable Not Applicable 2. Deadline for requesting any clarifications from the Contracting Authority 6th July, 2017 3. Last date on which clarifications are issued by the Contracting Authority 14th July, 2017 4. Deadline for submission of concept notes 27th July 2017 12:00hrs 5. Information to lead applicants on opening, administrative checks and concept note evaluation (Step 1) August, 2017 - 6. Invitations to submit full applications 31st August, 2017 - 7. Deadline for submission of full applications 16th October, 2017 - 8. Information to lead applicants on the evaluation of the full applications (Step 2) November, 2017 - 9. Notification of award (after the eligibility check) (Step 3) November, 2017 - 10. Contract signature December, 2017 - All dates and times are expressed in Brussels time, where it is not specified otherwise. This indicative timetable refers to provisional dates (except for dates 2, 3 and 4) and may be updated by the Contracting Authority during the procedure. In such cases, the updated timetable will be published on the EuropeAid web site and of the following lead delegations: Botswana (); Kenya ( );
hand-delivery, will be informed by email or by post if they did not provide any e-mail address. Therefore, please check regularly your PROSPECT profile, taking into account the indicative timetable below. An applicant believing that it has been harmed by an error or irregularity during the award process may lodge a complaint. See further section 2.4.15 of the Practical Guide. Indicative timetable DATE TIME 1. Information meeting, if any (local time) 31 May 2017 (tentative) 11:00 2. Deadline for requesting any clarifications from the Contracting Authority 8 June 2017 - 3. Last date on which clarifications are issued by the Contracting Authority 18 June 2017 - 4. Deadline for submission of concept notes 28/06/2017 12:00 5. Information to lead applicants on opening, administrative checks and concept note evaluation (Step 1) 18 July 2017 (tentative) - 6. Invitations to submit full applications 18 July 2017 (tentative) - 7. Deadline for submission of full applications 31 August 2017 (tentative) 12:00 8. Information to lead applicants on the evaluation of the full applications (Step 2) 18 September 2017 (tentative) - 9. Notification of award (after the eligibility check) (Step 3) 18 September 2017 (tentative) - 10. Contract signature 01 October 2017 (tentative) - All dates and times are expressed in Brussels time, where it is not specified otherwise. This indicative timetable refers to provisional dates (except for dates 2, 3 and 4) and may be updated by the Contracting Authority during the procedure. In such cases, the updated timetable will be published on the EuropeAid web site . Following the decision to award a grant, the beneficiary(ies) will be offered a contract based on the standard grant contract (see Annex G of these guidelines). By signing the application form (Annex A of these guidelines), the applicants agree, if awarded a grant, to accept the contractual conditions of the standard grant contract. Where the Coordinator is an organisation whose pillars have been positively assessed, it will sign a PA Grant Agreement based on the PAGoDA template. In this case references to provisions of the standard grant contract and its annexes shall not apply. References in these guidelines to the grant contract shall be understood as references to the relevant provisions of the PA Grant Agreement. Implementation contracts
outdated and do not allow for a proper evaluation of the financial capacity, the application may be rejected. The award criteria help to evaluate the quality of the applications in relation to the objectives and priorities set forth in the guidelines, and to award grants to projects which maximise the overall effectiveness of the call for proposals. They help to select applications which the Contracting Authority can be confident will comply with its objectives and priorities. They cover the relevance of the action, its consistency with the objectives of the call for proposals, quality, expected impact, sustainability and The evaluation grid is divided into sections and subsections. Each subsection will be given a score between 1 and 5 as follows: 1 = very poor; 2 = poor; 3 = adequate; 4 = good; 5 = very good. Evaluation Grid Section Maximum Score 1. Financial and operational capacity 20 1.1 Do the applicants and, if applicable, their affiliated entity(ies) have sufficient experience of project management? 5 1.2 Do the applicants and, if applicable, their affiliated entity(ies) have sufficient technical expertise? (especially knowledge of the issues to be addressed) 5 1.3 Does the lead applicant have sufficient management capacity (including staff, equipment and ability to handle the budget for the operation)? 5 1.4 Does the lead applicant have stable and sufficient sources of finance? 5 2. Relevance of the operation 30 Score transferred from the Concept Note evaluation 3. Effectiveness and feasibility of the operation 20 3.1 Are the activities proposed appropriate, practical, and consistent with the objectives and expected results? Are they well methodologically developed with a clear indication of the partners’ responsibilities? 5 3.2 Is the operation plan clear, logically structured and feasible? 5 3.3 Does the full application contain objectively verifiable indicators for the outcomes of the operation (at the level of overall objective, specific objective(s) and project results)? Are the project indicators likely to contribute to the achievement of programme indicators? Is any evaluation planned? 5 3.4 Is the co-applicant(s)'s and affiliated entity(ies)'s level of involvement and participation in the operation satisfactory? Does the proposal involve genuine cross-border cooperation (joint development, joint staffing, joint implementation, joint financing)? Are the activities proposed likely to have a clear cross-border benefit and impact? Is the partnership convincing? 5 4. Sustainability of the operation 15
Treasury would consider as an acceptable revised offer in compromise by the taxpayer. In this situation, Treasury may send a letter to the taxpayer and any third party designated representative that states the following: The amount of a revised offer in compromise that Treasury would consider acceptable; The reasons why Treasury’s analysis supports the revised offer in compromise as acceptable; and That the taxpayer must notify Treasury in writing within 20 calendar days of the date of Treasury’s letter that the taxpayer submits Treasury’s determined amount as the taxpayer’s revised offer in compromise, and that failure of the taxpayer to do so will be deemed as a decision not to submit a revised offer and the taxpayer’s submitted offer in compromise is rejected. If Treasury rejects an offer in compromise, it will send a rejection letter to the taxpayer and any third party designated representative. The letter must state that the offer in compromise is rejected, state the reasons for the rejection and that the taxpayer may request an independent administrative review of Treasury’s decision by filing a written request on Form 5186 Request for Independent Administrative Review of Rejected Offer in Compromise within 30 days after the date of rejection letter. Treasury may initiate collection activities after issuing the rejection letter. Once a taxpayer files a written request for independent administrative review, Treasury must suspend collection and may not levy against any property or assets to collect the tax debt while the independent administrative review is pending, unless Treasury determines that the taxpayer’s offer in compromise was solely intended to delay collection of the tax or Treasury determines the need to issue a jeopardy assessment. 2.4 Examination of Offers Based on Grant by the IRS of Federal Compromise under Section 7122 of the Internal Revenue Code Considering an Offer in Compromise Based on Grant of a Federal Offer in Compromise A taxpayer may submit an offer in compromise of a tax debt if the taxpayer was granted a federal compromise of tax under section 7122 of the Internal Revenue Code for the same tax periods. Treasury may accept a taxpayer’s offer in compromise on this basis if the taxpayer has otherwise satisfied all of the conditions necessary to submit an offer in compromise under section 23a of the Revenue Act, MCL 205.23a, which are the following: a. The taxpayer is not in bankruptcy; b. The taxpayer paid the required payment of $100.00 or 20% of the offer, whichever is greater; c. The tax liability included in the offer in compromise has been assessed by Treasury; ;
All funds must be received by . Refunds, less a $25 per space handling fee, will be available if requested in writing prior to __________. Product or services to be displayed: EXHIBITOR By: Name: Address: Telephone Number: Fax Number: E-mail: _____ Electrical connection desired? _____ Does your exhibit include a display board? $_________ Check enclosed payable to “(Host Chapter Name) Special Meeting Account” Checks should be mailed to: [EXHIBIT CHAIRMAN] [EXHIBIT CHAIRMAN’S ADDRESS] If you have any questions, please contact [EXHIBIT CHAIRMAN] at [EXHIBIT CHAIRMAN’S PHONE AND FAX NUMBERS AND E-MAIL ADDRESS].
Draft posters will be requested after the final acceptance of the submission. All submissions should be anonymized and will be reviewed by a panel of experts. Important Notice Participants with an accepted poster paper must register for the conference and present their poster during the Session. A space for poster presentation will be allocated to each participant. The proceedings CD will be distributed to the conference participants when they arrive for the conference.
PART A Introduction and Definitions Introduction These Guidelines are about the sale of smoking products in Tasmania. A smoking product is any tobacco product or personal vaporiser product (including electronic cigarettes or e-cigarettes). The Guidelines contain requirements for retailers, manufacturers, and distributors of those products. The Guidelines are issued by the Director of Public Health under the Public Health Act 1997. It is a legal requirement to comply with the Guidelines. Failure to do so is a breach of the Act and can result in fines. The Guidelines are set out as follows: This Part A includes definitions for certain words and phrases used in the Guidelines. Part B sets out the product and pricing information that licence holders may display in retail premises (section 70(2)(b)(ii) of the Act). Part C sets out the notices that licence holders must display and how to display them (section 69A(2) of the Act). Part D sets out the information that licence holders must provide employees (section 64(6) of the Act). Part E specifies the additional classes of documents that are acceptable forms of proof of age (section 3 of the Act). Part F sets out the packaging and labelling requirements for tobacco products (section 73 of the Act).
1) Research Fellowship for Young Scientists of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 2) a scholarship from the Japan Student Services Organization 3) a study grant from the Japan Student Services Organization 4) a scholarship for international students granted by a foreign governmental agency (if subject to restrictions on receiving multiple scholarships at the same time). Or, 5) an international student sponsored by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology As a general rule, you are not allowed to earn income by working part-time. However, TA, staff veterinarian and other work that is directly related to graduate study will be considered upon approval by the Program Coordinator. 7. Suspension of Scholarship If you fail to fulfill your responsibilities as a scholarship holder, your scholarship may be suspended. If the eligibility screening finds problems with your attendance record, academic performance or the like, then your scholarship may also be suspended. If you fall under any of the persons listed in “6. Restrictions on Holders of Other Scholarships” after the start of the scholarship period then your scholarship will be suspended. 8. Repayment or Return of Scholarship Funds This scholarship is granted to you without repayment obligations. However if you commit any act that deviates significantly from social norms during the scholarship period, then you may be requested to return your scholarship as you are no longer eligible for it. 9. Miscellaneous This scholarship aims to help graduate students concentrate on their studies without financial burden or anxiety. Once you start receiving this scholarship, you are thus expected to work hard toward a higher academic level and continuously apply for the Research Fellowship for Young Scientists of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science or any other similar program so that you can enroll in such programs. 10. Required Procedure before Receiving the Scholarship You are required to submit the following documents to the Leading School Section, International Affairs Office, Graduate School of Veterinary Medicine: 1) Notice of Agreement 2) Bank transfer application 3) Copy of your bankbook 4) Copy of your student identification card 11. Documents to Submit during the Scholarship Period 1) Attendance report Once you start receiving this scholarship, you are required to submit monthly attendance reports to the Leading School Section (VETLOG) by the end of each month. VETLOG Enter your ID and password for ELMS (students) or SSO(faculty). 2) Eligibility screening Once you start receiving this scholarship, you are required to pass the eligibility screening
Commuting Adjuncts (off-campus assessments): It may be difficult for Units to assess Term Adjuncts who are not located on campus. In these cases, off-campus assessments are acceptable. Heads can forward the assessment form to the Adjunct by email for return in the same manner. At the end of the process, a statement from the Adjunct stating that they have seen the completed assessment, and are pleased with the final version, can be accepted by email in lieu of a signature and attached to the form. Once complete, assessments can be sent directly to Heather Duguay in Dunning Hall Main Floor. Please note that the Dean’s Office does not require the USAT forms or supplementary teaching materials. Only the Term Adjunct Report Assessment Form and Heads Assessment Form are required. If you have questions or concerns regarding this process, please feel free to contact us. Heather Duguay, Staffing Administrative Assistant Dean's Office, Faculty of Arts & Science Tel: 613.533.6000 Ext. 77168; Fax: 613.533.2067 Email: duguayh@queensu.ca
Umbilical artery Growth restriction (EFW <P10, AC<P5 or crossing centiles) Risk factors for growth restriction (screening at 26 weeks): Preeclampsia Hypertension Previous history Metabolic syndrome (high BMI, diabetes mellitus, hypertension) Low PAPP-A values (< 0.4 MoM) in first trimester Previously high UA RI Sonographers, Obstetrician, Maternal & Fetal Medicine Subspecialists, SASUOG or Fetal Medicine Foundation accredited general practitioner MCA Growth restriction (EFW <P10, AC<P5 or crossing centiles) Increased UA RI or >32 weeks Red cell iso-immunization Maternal parvovirus B19 infection Complicated monochorionic twin pregnancies (e.g. suspected or diagnosed TTTS, TAPS or selective IUGR) SASUOG accreditation for second opinion ultrasound or Fetal Medicine Foundation accreditation for obstetrical Doppler evaluation Uterine artery (Preferably in T1, otherwise in T2) High risk of pre-eclampsia or growth restriction, including: Primigravidae Multigravidae with previous pre-eclampsia or growth restriction Metabolic syndrome (high BMI, diabetes mellitus, hypertension) Low PAPP-A values (< 0.4 MoM) in first trimester Pregnancy after ART Fetal Medicine Foundation accreditation for uterine artery Doppler evaluation
Fast animals for 12-24 hours prior to anesthesia to decrease incidence of regurgitation since MS222 can cause GI response. The action of MS222 as an anesthetic varies widely between species and is affected by water temperature, hardness, and size of the individual animal. Preliminary tests are recommended to determine concentration and exposure time for each application to assure sufficient anesthetic depth and safe recovery. Allow animal to reach appropriate level of anesthesia for planned procedure. There are narrower margin of safety in young fish, and soft, warm water. Maintain adequate oxygenation of the animal throughout induction, anesthesia and recovery. Oxygenation of the water can be accomplished by supplying pure oxygen via diffusers or similar devices. Aeration can be accomplished when biomass in the anesthesia container is low by supplying clean air via an air pump and air stone, or similar devices. In amphibians, anesthesia induction can be in a water bath. When inducing a terrestrial amphibian in an immersion anesthetic bath, keep the animal’s head and nares above the water line to prevent accidental drowning. In some cases, anesthesia with MS222 can be maintained by dripping a dilute solution of this drug over the skin or by covering animals with a paper towel moistened with the anesthetic. Higher concentrations of MS222 result in rapid anesthesia with shorter maximum tolerated exposure times, which are recommended for induction. Lower concentrations of MS222 result in longer induction times and longer maximum tolerated exposure times, which are recommended for maintenance of anesthesia. After procedures are completed place animals in well oxygenated/aerated, water or in a container lined with wet towels (terrestrial amphibians). Closely monitor fish/amphibians recovering from anesthesia until they are swimming/moving normally and completely regained their righting response. Recommended Dosages for Anesthesia Taxonomic Rank Dosage Comments Fish 15-50 mg/L Sedation 50-200 mg/L Induction 50-100 mg/L Maintenance 1 g/L Spray – large fish on gills directly Amphibians 50-200 mg/kg Most species – intracoelomic injection Frogs/Salamander 0.5-2 g/L Bath to effect/induction in 15-30 min Leopard Frogs 100-200 mg/L Intracoelomic injection Bullfrogs 100-400 mg/L Intracoelomic injection
An initial assessment might include information from interviews, clinical case notes, meetings, telephone calls, observations or daily diaries, past medical history, previous assessments, screening measures conducted during the initial assessment or by other colleagues. Make sure you note previous diagnoses or major treatment (such as inpatient psychiatric hospitalisation). Include placements (e.g. group home or day activity) if relevant for the assessment. Such assessment should form the basis for subsequent action including assessment of outcome. a) Background information on the client Date of birth, age, gender, and handedness. For children and young people with suspected learning disabilities: family, parents’ age, social and educational history, job functioning, marital history, health, siblings age, school performance, family history, medical or developmental history (for children this may include pregnancy, birth, perinatal incidents, hospitalisations-overnight), neurological history (blows to the head, seizures), milestones (first unsupported steps, first words other than mum/dad, toileting), current treatment/medication, school (academic progress – reading, writing and numeracy, socialising with peers, compliance with routines). For adults and older adults: family history, age and cause of parents’ deaths, social and educational history, job functioning, hobbies or interests, marital history, health, siblings age and health status, medical history, neurological history (blows to the head, seizures, stroke etc), current treatment/medication. b) Presenting Complaint Be behavioural and descriptive. How long has there been a problem, how severe is it, when did it start, what is the frequency/duration of the difficulties, does it vary, have there been previous attempts at intervention and how successful were they. c) Clinical impression Observe and comment briefly on grooming and clothes appearance, language and social presentation, affect, response to you, response to testing (is it therefore valid or representative of their actual abilities?). The CPR should contain a clear statement of what the client was like and how much assessment was possible;
Turn around time The required TAT Other considerations List any other factors that may affect the utility of the test for the intended purpose. Expected performance can be mentioned here. 2. Validation of new system System name Internal descriptive name Reference Internal ref. Applicability of measurements Is what is being tested appropriate and sufficient to achieve the desired results? Compared with specification. Selectivity Detail any test specific selectivity issues together with limitations and/or control measures taken to ensure test utility. A validation work plan (section 3) should be drawn up for any specific potential selectivity issues that cannot be eliminated by limitation or control measure[s]. Interferences Detail any test specific interference factors together with limitations and/or control measures taken to ensure test utility. A validation work plan (section 3) should be drawn up for any specific potential interference that cannot be eliminated by limitation or control measure[s]. Cross-reactivity Detail any test specific cross-reactivity together with limitations and/or control measures taken to ensure test utility. A validation work plan (section 3) should be drawn up for any specific potential cross-reactivity that cannot be eliminated by limitation or control measure[s]. Authorisation Name Signature Date Investigator Authoriser
11. Are the rules of and composition of the reference list followed? Yes Partially No 12. Conclusions and recommendations are drawn logically, they are clear, and could be applied in practice Yes Partially No 13. Author’s language of the final thesis, sequence of reasoning and consistency, literacy, orderliness correspond to the requirements applicable to the research thesis of this type Yes Partially No Additional remarks of the reviewer: .............. .............. Final conclusion of the reviewer: Final thesis is evaluated positively / negatively. ______________________________ (Reviewer’s name, surname, signature)
Annex 1: SDMX Representation of the confidentiality use cases Use case CONF_STATUS (Observation) Additional attributes Remarks Non-confidential data F Confidential data with no embargo C;D;S;A;O;T;G;M;N CONF_STATUS will usually be C but may also be D;S;A;O;T;G;M;N depending on the required status and confidentiality reason. See the CL_CONF_STATUS code list for details Forwarding of confidential data N CONF_REDIST: (Observation, Conditional) CONF_REDIST may represent multiple organisations Embargo: Privileged access E EMBARGO_TIME (Observation, Conditional) Only the observations with an EMBARGO_TIME attribute are embargoed. After the embargo time elapses, the data are free for publication (equivalent to F status). Embargo: Privileged access with forwarding E EMBARGO_TIME (Observation, Conditional) CONF_REDIST: (Observation, Conditional) Only the observations with an EMBARGO_TIME attribute are embargoed. After the embargo time elapses, the data are free for publication (equivalent to F status). CONF_REDIST may represent multiple organisations Embargo: Frontloading Set to the required confidentiality status after the embargo time elapses. <Header\EmbargoDate>: [timestamp] There is no EMBARGO_TIME attribute as the whole message is embargoed with no privileged access.
The project envisages measures for energy and resource efficiency. The criterion is included in the SEA Opinion on OP Environment The project envisages measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to help climate change adaptation and the resilience of infrastructure to disasters. soil The project enables the limiting of soil sealing outside urban areas when determining the sites. The criterion is included in the SEA Opinion on OP Environment The project envisages recultivation of damaged areas affected during construction. The criterion is included in the SEA Opinion on OP Environment noise The project provides for appropriate measures to reduce noise (organizational, urban planning, works - acoustic), in stages: design, construction and operation. The criterion is included in the SEA Opinion on OP Environment 2. Extension of the water monitoring systems 2.1 Monitoring of the quantitative water status. 2.2 Water Quality Monitoring. Criteria laid down in legal requirements water The project envisages completion or equipment of water monitoring networks justified and planned in the relevant RBMP. For projects related to construction of monitoring networks. The project envisages purchase of measurement tools to ensure implementation of water monitoring planned in the relevant RBMP. For the construction of monitoring sites and stations, materials not affecting water composition and features are to be provided. Criteria setting higher requirements These criteria are not applicable to direct award calls for proposals. climate The project envisages measures to help climate change adaptation and ensure resilience of infrastructure to disasters. 3. Development of new and/or update of existing strategic documents for the implementation of the Water Framework Directive and the Marine strategy framework directive Criteria setting higher requirements These criteria are not applicable to direct award calls for proposals.
SUPPLIER CODE OF CONDUCT Code of conduct for Suppliers – Islamic Relief Worldwide requires all suppliers to adhere to Code of Conduct developed by the Inter Agency Procurement Group (IAPG). Suppliers and manufacturers to Non-Governmental Organisations (NGO’s) should be aware of the Code of Conduct initiatives that the Inter-Agency Procurement Group (IAPG) supports. This information is to advise you, our suppliers of the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) element in our supplier relationships. Goods and services purchased are produced and developed under conditions that do not involve the abuse or exploitation of any persons. Goods produced and delivered by organisations subscribe to no exploitation of children Goods produced and manufactured have the least impact on the environment Code of Conduct for Suppliers Goods and services are produced and delivered under conditions where: Employment is freely chosen The rights of staff to freedom of association and collective bargaining are respected. Living wages are paid There is no exploitation of children Working conditions are safe and hygienic Working hours are not excessive No discrimination is practised Regular employment is provided No harsh or inhumane treatment of staff is allowed. Environmental Standards: Suppliers should as a minimum comply with all statutory and other legal requirements relating to environmental impacts of their business. Areas to be considered are: Waste Management Packaging and Paper Conservation Energy Use Sustainability Business Behaviour Islamic Relief will seek alternative sources where the conduct of suppliers demonstrably violates anyone’s basic human rights, and there is no willingness to address the situation within a reasonable time-frame. Islamic Relief will seek alternative sources where companies in the supply chain are involved in the manufacture of arms or the sale of arms to governments which systematically violate the human rights of their citizens. Qualifications to the statement Where speed of deployment is essential in saving lives, IAPG members will purchase necessary goods and services from the most appropriate available source.
Diabetes associations (patients, families and healthcare professionals) Teachers + parents What is diabetes type 1 and 2 diabetes? Myths and Facts Signs and Symptoms Hyper- /Hypo-glycemia Location of the KIDS pack online (LINK to IDF Website) Video Food and Exercise Pyramids Interactive materials: ; Children What is type 1 and type 2 diabetes? How to prevent type 2 diabetes? Human Body: A model human body will be used with the children in order to show them first-hand the difference between the way a normal body works and the way a body of a child with diabetes works. Games in class KiDS whiteboard video School staff in particular teachers, school nurses and school principals Children How the body works? What is type 1 and type 2 diabetes? Myths and Facts about diabetes Lifestyle and nutrition Physical Activity Prevention of illness 1) Puzzle on “A day in the life of Tom” 2) Role Play on “A day in the life of Tom” 3) 4) 5) Parents of a child with diabetes Teachers + children What is type 1 and type 2 diabetes? Hyper- /Hypoglycaemia Discrimination, stigma, bullying 1) Quiz competition on the myths 2) Puzzle on “A day in the life of Tom” 3) Role Play on “A day in the life of Tom” 4) 5) Online games ( or the ) 6) Children (in particular children with diabetes) Children How is your daily life with diabetes? Lifestyle and nutrition Physical activity 1) Puzzle on “A day in the life of Tom” 2) Role Play on “A day in the life of Tom” 3) 4) Online games ( or the ) 5)
Date: 14th March 2018 Dear Sir/madam, GUIDELINES DOCUMENT FOR RAMADAN FOOD PARCELS TO TURKEY TENDER REF-2018-0302, MARCH 2018 You are invited to submit a quotation for the above tender in accordance with the terms and conditions included attached. In the event of any query relating to the project, please email tendering@irworldwide.org If posting your quotation – it should be sealed and delivered to: Islamic Relief Worldwide, 19 Rea Street South, Digbeth, Birmingham, B5 6LB 1:00pm UK time on Monday, 16th April 2018 You may submit via email but the same deadline applies. Quotations received after this time may not be considered. Islamic Relief Worldwide office opening times are 8.45am – 6.00pm Monday to Friday UK time. Project Timetable Closing date for receipt of quotations Monday, 16th April 2018, 1:00pm UK time Contacts Please address any queries to tendering@irworldwide.org Kind regards Procurement team REQUIREMENTS AND GUIDELINES FOR SUBMITTING A QUOTATION: 1. Islamic Relief Worldwide (“IRW”) invites quotations in accordance with the documents provided.
Date of Group Professional’s Name(s) Preparation What might prevent me from having an open mind as I think of facilitating this group? What materials do I want to have available? What Baby TALK curriculum will support families at this time? Age specific curriculum or other? Assessment Based on previous groups, what should I note in the environment and in how families respond? Affiliation What you might ask individuals about based on previous groups and the content of this group? Observation What do I specifically want to observe during this group? Developmental Behaviors What specific developmental behaviors do I want to support during this group? What activities will I use to support these behaviors? IELG Activity: Homemade Toy: Lapsit: Other:
Are the records classified as RNA, RP or meet the RNA criteria? Yes Not covered by the Authority, contact NAA Covered by the Authority Yes No Are the conditions satisfied? Yes No No Are the records subject to the exclusions listed in the Authority?
The methods used for formulating recommendations are described (describe in detail which methods were used- e.g. informal consensus or formal consensus such as Delhi, Glaser techniques...) Reviewer 1 (CS team): Criteria met: Comments: Action required: Reviewer 2 (QIC lead): Criteria met: Comments: Action required: Health benefits, side effects and risks have been considered (describe in detail how these have been considered when making recommendations) Reviewer 1 (CS team): Criteria met: Comments: Action required: Reviewer 2 (QIC lead): Criteria met: Comments: Action required: There is an explicit link between recommendations and supporting evidence (describe how each component of the body of evidence have been made relevant to each recommendation) Reviewer 1 (CS team): Criteria met: Comments: Action required: Reviewer 2 (QIC lead): Criteria met: Comments: Action required: The guideline has been externally reviewed by experts prior to publication (describe which external specialty groups and stakeholder organisations have been consulted and how the review has been carried out) Reviewer 1 (CS team): Criteria met: Comments: Action required: Reviewer 2 (QIC lead): Criteria met: Comments: Action required: State the procedure for updating the guideline (describe the update process and when the guideline will be updated) Reviewer 1 (CS team): Criteria met: Comments: Action required: Reviewer 2 (QIC lead): Criteria met: Comments: Action required: 4. Clarity and presentation The recommendations are specific and unambiguous (include the list of recommendations) Reviewer 1 (CS team): Criteria met: Comments: Action required:
8. Healthcare setting Included Not included 9. Potential Potential to improve current practice Potential impact on important health outcomes (name measureable indicators) Potential impact on resources (name measureable indicators) 10. What evidence based guidance is currently available? None Out-of-date (list) Current (list) 11. Relevance to current Government policies 12. Who is this guidance for? 13. Implementation Links with existing audit programmes Existing educational initiatives Strategies for monitoring implementation 14. Primary contact for topic proposal 15. Group(s) or institution(s) supporting the proposal
With noticeable writing errors. good reasoning skills. Some writing errors. with evidence and shows sign of profound thinking. Writing errors are minimal. injustices. The presentation of the evidence is both appropriate and powerful. The established argument is both well substantiated and profound. Proficiency in writing.
Event Planner II/Senior Research Analyst Senior Event Planner (II) responsible for logistics planning (event and facility catering functions, meeting requirements and layouts, etc.), oversee the design/publishing/printing of event agenda/program guide, develop and produce audio advertising, oversee registration preparation, advertising/promotional campaigns, handling phone inquiries, meetings/telephone correspondence with sponsors/clients, progress updates, oversee printing of promotional campaign materials, post-event follow-up, event set-up, on-site event management, oversee event evaluations, designs research studies. An event manager may review invoices, assist to coordinate website developments and updates, handle logistical planning (catering, directions, visits, etc.), and prepare registration materials and premiums under supervision of senior event manager or project manager and may, at times, be assigned a specific area to manage (e.g., Speaker Manager, Room Director, etc.). AA/AS in related field; Education may be substituted for 3 years event planning experience. Certified Meeting Planner (CMP) designation may also be substituted for education/experience requirements. Event/Meeting Coordinator/Market Analyst This position provides expert support to the Event Planner II/Senior Research Analyst by assisting with the logistical elements of conferences, meetings and special events, administering studies and conducting data analysis. The ideal candidate must provide service for internal and external clients. 1-2 years prior experience. Administrative Assistant Performs administrative and office support activities in support of meeting planning and management. Duties may include fielding telephone calls, receiving and directing visitors, word processing, filing, and faxing. HS Diploma/GED; One (1) year Customer Service Experience; valid driver’s license.
Acceptable evidence may include an Australian or overseas birth certificate or birth extract, passport, citizenship documents or Australian visa documents. 2.5 Gender Female Female Female Male Male Male Self-described: Self-described: Self-described: 2.6 Describe the relationship(s) between the applicant(s) and the child 2.7 Evidence that you have parental responsibility for the child. Attached Attached Attached Acceptable evidence includes a copy of the birth certificate identifying the applicant(s) as parent(s) or a court order allocating parental responsibility to the applicant(s). Child 1 Child 2 Child 3 2.8 Is the child the subject of a current order of a court or tribunal or a parenting plan that would affect your ability to home school your child? Note: any parent responsible for home schooling must disclose if there is any order of a court or a tribunal that restricts the ability of the parent applying to provide regular and efficient instruction. A court order may include a parenting order, an intervention order, or a child protection order (however described). No, an order of a court or tribunal does not exist that prevents or restricts me/either of us from providing instruction in home schooling. No, an order of a court or tribunal does not exist that prevents or restricts me/either of us from providing instruction in home schooling. No, an order of a court or tribunal does not exist that prevents or restricts me/either of us from providing instruction in home schooling. Yes, an order of a court or tribunal exists that prevents or restricts me/either of us from providing instruction in home schooling. Attach a copy of order or enforceable agreement. Yes, an order of a court or tribunal exists that prevents or restricts me/either of us from providing instruction in home schooling. Attach a copy of order or enforceable agreement. Yes, an order of a court or tribunal exists that prevents or restricts me/either of us from providing instruction in home schooling. Attach a copy of order or enforceable agreement. 2.9 Is there equal shared parental responsibility (for example, under a parenting order or parenting plan)? No No No Yes, attach evidence of consent of the other party. Yes, attach evidence of consent of the other party. Yes, attach evidence of consent of the other party. Part C – Learning Information 3.1 Where will most of the instruction take place? Residential address of Applicant One Residential address of Applicant Two Other address:
The importance of the regional approach to the topic addressed is clearly demonstrated; the results cannot (or only to some extent) be achieved without cooperation. Partnership is diversified and inclusive. Relevance of the project: (up to 25 points) The specific objective is contributing to regional cooperation, and strengthening regional cohesion in the WB6. The regional challenge has been defined in a clear and comprehensive manner. The solution is realistic and achievable. The project is based on a novel idea and/or enhances people-to-people links in an innovative manner. Methodology: (up to 20 points) The proposed budget is reasonable and provides a detailed breakdown of the costs associated with the project. The expected results are consistent with the objectives of the project. The potential risks that could endanger the achievement of the project results have been identified and the applicant has proposed a strategy to mitigate these risks. Co-financing option is clearly explained. Project Management Capacity: (up to 15 points) The applicant has previous experience relatable to the proposed project. The applicants have other technical tools and facilities at their disposal relevant for the project implementation. Sustainability and visibility (20 points) Target audiences are clearly described. The applicants have demonstrated clear approach to ensure WBF visibility during the implementation of project activities. The extent to which the proposed plan for dissemination of the project results and achievements is clear, comprehensive and meaningful. The project outcomes can be used as good practices lessons by other actors in the region. The action has a potential for follow-up and replicability. The sustainability of the project is addressed comprehensively. Submission of supporting documents Upon the assessment of the project proposals, shortlisted project beneficiaries will be requested to provide the following documents in order to allow the WBF to verify the eligibility of the lead applicant and the project partners: Statute and the registration Financial statement Partnership agreement
Service Contracts () Crown Funding Agreement variations Service Specifications Casemix and Non-casemix groups, Costing Group, National Costing and Pricing Programme National Collections: NNPAC, NMDS, PRIMHD etc. DHB decision support and clinical services staff Common Counting Standards DHB Planning and Funding staff Common Chart of Accounts Sector Operations - processing of DHB/Ministry contracts and payments Common Costing Standards Purchase Unit Data Dictionary Ministry data analysis, modelling and reporting Inter-district Flows (IDF), Population Based Funding Formula (PBFF) data Ministry service reviewers National Reference Price List, Casemix and Non-casemix Frameworks Ministry CFA variation owners Payment Systems – Proclaim, CCPS, Ministry as funders (all directorates) Monitoring - Production Plan, CFA variation, and service specification reporting, monthly financial report data, quarterly reporting data, output classes Appendix 2 – Units of Measure The units of measure in the table below provide the rules on how to count events mapping to purchase units. These have been developed by CCTAG. Unit of Measure Definition Adjuster Price adjustment for cost elements not adequately recognised within national purchase unit base prices.
Prior To KS Appointment Completion Date Meet with CC/CCF to discuss KS Program Review the KS Desktop Reference Guide Inform CC or CCF of interest to become a KS Request an official interview with the CC or designee Acquire references and inform them they may be contacted Complete required paperwork/forms KS Required Training Due Completed Notes Attend Required/Designated Trainings: KS Overview Communication Generational Diversity Social Media/Operational Security Deployment Disaster Preparedness Personal Identifying Information Resilience KS Continuing Education Due Completed Notes Installation and Community Resources Heart Link Additional Resilience Training Suicide Awareness Sexual Assault Prevention Response AFRC and ANG 101 (where applicable) Additional training as required Obtain Unit Recall Rosters Action Items Due Completed Notes Tour of the building (where permitted) with the Commander or First Sergeant, so that introductions can be made as well as a general feel for the section. Meet with outgoing KS for turn-over of information/folders, etc. As new KS, send out introduction e-mail to unit spouses, helping to verify accurate contact information AND schedule initial meeting with all unit spouses. Key Spouse business card or make POC information available. Prior to deployments,, schedule meeting with spouses of deployed members, to know their plans during deployment Establish rapport with CSS Personnel Attend Commanders Calls and meetings as required Consult with Mentor Spouse and meet with other unit KS’s/KSM’s regularly *Learn unit Battle Rhythm (Exercises, deployments, trainings) Develop personal KS goals
management plan identified. 10.2 Accreditation All community skin cancer clinicians should identify the Local Skin Cancer MDT to which they relate. Good communication should be established to ensure the consistency and continuity of services for patients. The accreditation and governance arrangements are set out in the table below. Service Clinical accreditation by MDT Placed on PCT GPwSI list Employer responsible for clinical governance Community outreach from Local or Specialist MDT (a consultant led service that may include staff grade and associate specialist doctors and specialist nurses. Assumed through consultant led service No Acute Trust hosting MDT Model 2 Practitioners Yes No Acute Trust hosting MDT Group 3 GPwSI in dermatology and skin surgery Yes Yes GP Practice or GPwSI (depending on contractual Group 3a GPwSI in skin lesions and skin surgery Yes Yes GP Practice or GPwSI (depending on contractual GPs performing skin surgery within the framework of the DES and LES Enhanced Services under GMS or PMS Yes No, but placed on PCT list for GPs performing skin surgery within the framework of the DES and LES Enhanced Services under GMS or PMS GP Practice *Some GPs may be accredited as both a GPwSI and a Model 2 practitioner.