COMPETITIVE SCHOOL READINESS LICENSING AND ACCREDITATION/APPROVAL STATUS SITE LICENSING NAEYC STATUS HEAD START Yes License Exp. Date Exempt Pending ID# Certificate Exp. Date 3-yr window Due Date Candidacy Date (see NAEYC timeline) Expected Date of Visit (3-month window) Yes No
COMPETITIVE SCHOOL READINESS SPACE PROPOSAL FOR FY 2015 Council-approved funded spaces within current allocation. Site Start Date* # FD / FY Spaces Total FD / FY Cost # SD / SY Spaces Total SD / SY Cost # PD / PY Spaces Total PD / PY Cost Total # Spaces Total Cost *Indicate the first year this site received School Readiness funds.
LEARNING EXPERIENCE PLAN RUBRIC Town and Name of Program: ____________________________________________________ Reader: _______________________________________ Criteria Beginning-1 Developing-2 Accomplished-3 Exemplary-4 Score Recommendations A Daily Schedule with estimated time allotments The daily schedule is included with no time allotments indicated The schedule indicates time for learning centers, group experiences, and outdoor experiences. The schedule clearly indicates substantial time for learning centers, group experiences and outdoor experiences. The schedule clearly indicates substantial and balanced time for learning centers, whole and small group experiences and outdoor experiences. Learning Centers clearly indicated in plans and available Little evidence of centers. Some centers listed with minimal planning. Variety of centers listed with evidence of planning. Wide variety of centers listed and evidence of detail in planning. Learning Experiences Associated with Preschool Assessment Framework standards Standard(s) are identified but are not clearly associated to learning experiences One or more standards are clearly identified and show connections to learning experiences Three standards are clearly identified and experiences are specifically described to align with the standard. Three standards are clearly identified and show connections to learning experiences. Planned experiences are directly connected to the benchmarks associated with the standard. Teaching Strategies (Adult actions are described) -Activities listed, no evidence of teaching strategies -Evidence of teaching strategies planned for one experience for one or two standards -Evidence of teaching strategies planned for one experience for each of the three standards -Evidence of individualizing for specific children -Evidence of teaching strategies planned for one experience for each of the three standards -Evidence of teaching strategies throughout the day -Evidence of individualizing for specific children
Criteria Beginning-1 Developing-2 Accomplished-3 Exemplary-4 Early literacy experiences Includes time for Shared Reading and/or Read Aloud Includes a daily plan for Shared Reading and/or Read Aloud -Includes a daily plan for Shared Reading and/or Read Aloud -Support for oral language development -Evidence of listening, speaking, reading, and writing -Evidence of individualization, including support for dual language learners Bloom’s taxonomy Little or no evidence of Bloom’s taxonomy Evidence of planned higher order thinking questions Evidence of planned higher order thinking questions and experiences Evidence of planned higher order thinking questions and experiences stating connection to Bloom’s Taxonomy Observation plans (max 2 pts) Little or no evidence that observation of children occurs Evidence that observation of children occurs N/A N/A Family engagement Little or no evidence of planned family engagement Evidence of planned family-teacher communication Evidence of plans to engage families in various ways (example: -communication -volunteerism -learning at home) N/A Reflection Little or no reflection documented Reflections documented Total: NOTES: