or would be implemented of a smaller scope, lower quality or in a longer term Information source: part (B) of the application. 4. The project seeks clear and feasible quantitative objectives consistent with the Programme aim. 4.1. Project contributes to the implementation of indicators of the Programme. Does the project seek respective outcome and output indicators of the Programme? Explanation: ascertaining whether the project seeks respective outcome and output indicators set out in the Programme and when the activities of the project are implemented these indicators will be reached. NB. Respective outcome indicators set out in Paragraph 8 of the Guidelines, output indicators set out in Paragraph 12 (if Measure I has been chosen) or Paragraph 13 (if Measure II has been chosen) of the Guidelines shall be chosen as mandatory (at least one outcome indicator must be chosen, and if Measure I has been chosen, at least two output indicators from the ones indicated in Subparagraphs 12.1-12.3 of the Guidelines and both output indicators indicated in Subparagraphs 12.4 and 12.5 of the Guidelines must be chosen, or, if Measure II has been chosen, both output indicators indicated in Paragraph 13 of the Guidelines must be chosen). Source of information: part (A) of the application. 4.2. Consistency of the intrinsic logic of the project and good quality of the project objectives. 4.2.1. Is the intrinsic logic of the project maintained? Explanations: ascertaining whether the consistent intrinsic logic of the project is maintained, i.e. project outcomes are the results of the project activities, project activities create preconditions for realisation of project objectives, and objectives facilitate the implementation of the established aims of the project. Source of information: part (A) and part (B) of the application. 4.2.2. Are the objectives of the project specific, measurable, achievable, connected and set in timely manner? Explanations: ascertaining whether project objectives are:
sustainable development in the economic area. Source of information Part (A) of the application. 6.1.4. Regional development area (reduction of environmental, social and economic inequalities). Explanations: ascertaining whether project implementation does not have any negative impact for the implementation of the principle of sustainable development in the regional development area. Source of information: Part (A) of the application. 6.2. The attempts to promote the implementation of the principle of sustainable development are reflected in the project. 6.2.1. The specific measures are proposed which ensure that the project contributes to the implementation of the principle of sustainable development. Explanation: the project captures specific activities or measures (manifests active initiative), which contribute to the implementation of the principle of sustainable development (assessed in connection with the criterion 3.2 of this Methodology). Source of information: Part (A) of the application. 7. The project supports the principle of gender equality and equal opportunities. 7.1. The project does not include any restrictions which might negatively affect the implementation of the principle of gender equality and equal opportunities. 7.1.1. Are there any limitations envisaged in the project which might preclude the implementation of the principle of gender equality and equal opportunities? Explanations: ascertaining whether the project implementation does not have any negative impact on the implementation of the principle of gender equality and equal opportunities: men and women are provided with equal opportunities to participate in the project and use the project outcomes; representatives of each race or ethnical origin, religion or beliefs, age, disability, sexual orientation have equal opportunities to participate in the project. Source of information: Part (A) of the application.
Table is filled in according to the information provided in the table “Logical justification of the project” in the part A of the application for the project financing. In the rows marked with * numbers and titles of the activities shall match the numbers and titles of the activities indicated in the table of the part A. In this table describing in detail and justifying project activities, how they will contribute to the achievement of project aims and objectives, etc. If several activities are combined in the table of the part A, in this table they are divided in separate rows. 1.4. B) INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROJECT BENEFIT ON NATIONAL/REGIONAL/INSTITUTIONAL LEVEL (Applied to projects under measure II) Please describe the benefits of project results in the area of adult education on national/regional/institutional level. 1.5. JUSTIFICATION OF THE NEED FOR SUPPORT Please provide justification that the project could not implemented without support, or would be implemented of a smaller scope, lower quality or in a longer term. 1.6. PROJECT RISKS AND THEIR MANAGEMENT FACTORS The major risks that can arise during the project implementation (e.g. financial, legal, institutional and etc.), and their mitigation measures. Risk, its impact to the project Risk mitigation measures 1.7. RECEIVED (PLANNED TO RECEIVE) SUPPORT 1.7.1. Has the application for support to this project or part of this project been submitted from other programme, financed from State budged, European Union, EEA or other international support funds? Yes If yes, please describe in detail (provide the financial measure concerned, numbers of references, dates, sought sums, allocated sums, etc.) No 1.7.2. Does this project or a part of this project complement any other project, which is already being funded or will be funded from State budget, European Union, EEA or other international programme funds? Yes If yes, please describe in detail (provide specific data, numbers of references, dates, sought sums, allocated sums, etc.) No
Annex 7 METHODOLOGY OF MEASUREMENT AND CALCULATION OF MONITORING INDICATORS Seq. No. Type and title of the indicator Explanation of the indicator Measurement of the indicator Institution or person in charge of the provision of information to the CPMA and (or) Ministry of Education and Science Mandatority of the indicator Measurement unit Information source 1. Outcome indicator: Number of good practise handbooks or guidelines (programmes, recommendations) developed. Number of good practise handbooks or guidelines (programmes, recommendations) in relation to the aim and activities of the project developed and printed during the project implementation. Project promoter shall choose in the part (A) of the application at least one of these indicators. Number Primary source: Copies of the good practise handbooks or guidelines (programmes, recommendations). Secondary source: The final project implementation report and payment claims submitted by the project promoter. Project promoter 2. Outcome indicator: Number of evidences of forecasted/further cooperation. Number of further cooperation initiatives planned by the project promoter after the project implementation. Number The final project completion report and payment claims submitted by the project promoter. Project promoter 3. Outcome indicator: Number of articles/posters/reports concerning funded projects presented at conferences, seminars. Number of articles/posters/reports in relation to the programme and project aims that were presented at conferences, seminars during the project implementation. Number Primary source: copies of articles/posters/reports. Secondary source: The final project implementation report and payment claims submitted by the project promoter. Project promoter 4. Outcome indicator: Number of joint articles / publications / reports prepared, published or submitted for publishing, also those published in electronic environment or/and those Number of jointly developed articles/publications/reports in relation to programme and project aims prepared, published or submitted for publishing, also those published in electronic environment or/and those Number Primary source: copies of articles/publications/reports. Secondary source: The final project implementation report and payment claims submitted by the project promoter. Project promoter
Number of mobility projects that were implemented in cooperation with the partner institutions. indicator in the part (A) of the application, if the project is implemented under Measure I. payment claims submitted by the project promoter. 10. Output indicator: Number of projects that were implemented in cooperation with the partner institutions. Number of projects intended for institutional cooperation in the field of education and implemented in cooperation with the institution(s) of the partner(s). Project promoter shall choose this indicator in the part (A) of the application, if the project is implemented under Measure II. Number The final project implementation report and payment claims submitted by the project promoter. Project promoter 11. Output indicator: Number of institutions that took part in projects. Number of project promoter and each partner’s institutions that took part in projects intended for inter-institutional cooperation in the field of education. Project promoter shall choose this indicator in the part (A) of the application, if the project is implemented under Measure II. Number Primary source: List of institutions that took part in the project (submitted together with the final project implementation report). Secondary source: The final project completion report and payment claims submitted by the project promoter. Project promoter _____________________________