zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Checkboxes in the document are considered “checked” when you type an ‘x’ in the corresponding column. It is not necessary to populate every field for an individual. Some fields are only applicable to specific use cases. Starting the envelope On the home page, click “New”. Click “Send an Envelope” from the list of options. Selecting the template Select “Use a template”. This will open Search for the “New Graduate Associate Appointment Document BULK” owned by Benjamin Crawford Click “Add Selected” to add the document to the Envelope Configuring Recipients
Enter the Appointing Unit’s information Enter the Optional Appointing Unit’s information. If you do not require this Recipient, you can remove it by clicking the ‘x’. Enter the Student’s information by clicking More > Replace List > Browse and then browsing for your CSV. After selecting your CSV, you will be shown a preview of your upload. If necessary, you can also edit the fields by clicking on them should you need to change any values. Click “Finish Import” to finalize the list of Recipients. When finished configuring the Recipients, click “Next” in the upper-right corner to proceed. Sending the document Click the “Send” button in the upper-right corner to finish. At this point you are finished and the documents will begin sending to each individual listed in the uploaded CSV.
Review the SCO-522 Click one time on the SCO-522 node. The revenues and expenditures per the SCO-545 have been posted to the Agency Records column on the SCO-522. Completing the Closing Entry via the SCO-529 Form Click one time on the SCO-529 node. Click one time on the Calculate Closing Entry icon on the horizontal ribbon to calculate the closing entry. Click one time on the OK button. The closing entry will be displayed, as well as the ending fund balance. Click one time on the Fund package node. The screen will indicate that the fund is in balance. (Once the fund is in balance, you may post any additional reclass or adjusting journal entries.) Locally Held Agency Package Forms SCO-510 The purpose of the Explanation of GAAP Account Changes is to identify and explain material changes in GAAP accounts from the prior year to the current year. Material changes for statewide reporting purposes are determined by applying two separate tests, as defined below. A change meeting either test is considered material and must be explained. SCO-521 The purpose of the Locally Held Funds Trial Balance For Assets, Liabilities and Fund Equity is to provide a worksheet for conversion of agency records to the GAAP basis. Form is read-only SCO-530 The purpose of the Account Summary Analysis Form is to summarize reclassifications by account number. This summary allows for a smoother transition when posting reclassifications to the trial balance. Form is read-only SCO-544 The purpose of the Miscellaneous Journal Entry Form is to post reclassifying journal entries that are not made by other forms. Form is used to post reclassifying journal entries that are not made by other forms Entries on this form will automatically carry to the SCO-547 Should only be used when there is no way to use an automated journal entry from another package form SCO-545 The purpose of the Trial Balance Entry Form is to post account balances, per agency records, that are not posted by other forms.
House of GAAP House of GAAP Category (a) (Most authoritative) FASB Standards and Interpretations Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinions AICPA Accounting Research Bulletins (ARBs) Category (b) FASB Technical Bulletins AICPA Industry Audit and Accounting Guides AICPA Statements of Position (SOPs) Category (c) FASB Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) AICPA AcSEC Practice Bulletins Category (d) (Least authoritative) AICPA Accounting Interpretations FASB Implementation Guides (Q and A) Widely recognized and prevalent industry practices
Plan Name Deferred Outflows of Resources Deferred Inflows of Resources Difference between expected and actual experiences $ $ Net difference between projected and actual earnings on pension plan investments $ $ Changes in assumptions or other inputs $ $ Changes in proportion and differences between contributions and proportionate share of contributions $ $ Contributions subsequent to the measurement date $ $ TOTAL $ $ Plan Name Deferred Outflows of Resources Deferred Inflows of Resources Difference between expected and actual experiences $ $ Net difference between projected and actual earnings on pension plan investments $ $ Changes in assumptions or other inputs $ $ Changes in proportion and differences between contributions and proportionate share of contributions $ $ Contributions subsequent to the measurement date $ $ TOTAL $ $
LEA Proposing a Planning Year for One or More Schools LEA PROJECTED BUDGET: (Enter LEA Name Here) List Below the Priority Schools Identified Year 1 Budget (Planning) Year 2 Budget (Full implementation) Year 3 Budget (Full implementation) Year 4 Budget (Full implementation) Year 5 Budget (Sustainability Activities) Five- Year Total Total Budget:
Year 2 – Implementation Year FY18 - July 1, 2017 – September 30, 2018 LEA Name: __________________________________________________________________________ School Name: _________________________________________________________________________ Intervention Model ________________________
Teacher attendance rate 2014-2015 2015-2016 Teacher evaluation data by levels (Level 1 is equivalent to Ineffective and Level 4 is equivalent to Exemplary on TKES) 2015-2016 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Student Achievement Data 2014-2015 2015-2016 Provide a summary of existing status and current needs. Reading/Language Arts All Students category Subgroups: Economically disadvantaged students, Special education students English Language Learners (ELL) Race/ethnicity subgroups Mathematics All Students category Subgroups: Economically disadvantaged students, Special education students English Language Learners (ELL) Race/ethnicity subgroups Graduation rate (if applicable) (Estimate 2016 if data is not yet available)
Plan Name Deferred Outflows of Resources Deferred Inflows of Resources Difference between expected and actual experiences $ $ Net difference between projected and actual earnings on pension plan investments $ $ Changes in assumptions or other inputs $ $ Changes in proportion and differences between contributions and proportionate share of contributions $ $ Contributions subsequent to the measurement date $ $ TOTAL $ $ Plan Name Deferred Outflows of Resources Deferred Inflows of Resources Difference between expected and actual experiences $ $ Net difference between projected and actual earnings on pension plan investments $ $ Changes in assumptions or other inputs $ $ Changes in proportion and differences between contributions and proportionate share of contributions $ $ Contributions subsequent to the measurement date $ $ TOTAL $ $ Plan Name Deferred Outflows of Resources Deferred Inflows of Resources Difference between expected and actual experiences $ $ Net difference between projected and actual earnings on pension plan investments $ $ Changes in assumptions or other inputs $ $ Changes in proportion and differences between contributions and proportionate share of contributions $ $ Contributions subsequent to the measurement date $ $ TOTAL $ $
County Cumann na mBunscol Committee (club teams are from within the one county) Provincial Council (one or more teams are from different counties with the one province) Ulster Council / Comhairle Uladh Leinster Coucil / Comhairle Laighean Munster GAA / Comhairle na Mumhan Connacht Council / Comhairle Connacht Central Council (one or more teams are from different provinces) Signature / Sínithe …………………………………………...………… (Chairperson / Cathaoirleach) Signature / Sínithe ………………………………...……...................... (Secretary / Rúnaí) Date / Dáta…………………………………. The above application has been approved by the County Committee / Co. Cumann na mBunscol Committee…………………………………………………………………………………………(state county) and I herewith enclose the €20 tournament fee to Signature / Sínithe …………………………………………...………… (Chairperson / Cathaoirleach) Signature / Sínithe ………………………………...……...................... (Secretary / Rúnaí) Date / Dáta…………………………………. The above application has been approved by (County/Provine Coiste/Chúige) ………………………………………………………………………. Signature / Sínithe (Secretary / Rúnaí) …………………………………………...…………………………………………………………. Date / Dáta………………………………….
15-A-SIDE LEAGUE APPLICATION Under 13 (Club) and 5th & 6th / P.6 & P.7 Classes (Primary Schools) Clubs Leagues: This application form should be completed by all Co. Games Development Committees on behalf of all units – except primary schools – who wish run a hurling and/or Gaelic football league using up to 15 players per team within that county at the Under 13 age grade only. It should be completed and submitted to the Secretary of the National Games Development Committee. Completed applications will only be considered on an annual basis, prior to the end of January of that calendar year, in compliance with Rule 6.26 Official Guide/ Treoraí Oifigiúil & Policy. Cumann na mBunscol / Primary Schools: This application form should be completed by all Co. Cumann na mBunscol Committees on behalf of all primary school units wish run a hurling and/or Gaelic football league using up to 15 players per team within that county at 5th & 6th or P.6 & P.7 Class level. It should be completed and submitted to the Secretary of the National Cumann na mBunscol Committee. Completed applications will only be considered on an annual basis, prior to the end of July of that calendar year, in compliance with Rule 6.26 Official Guide/ Treoraí Oifigiúil (T.O.) & Policy. (Please tick boxes and use BLOCK CAPITALS where appropriate) Inter-club or Inter-primary school County ………………………………………… Code Hurling Gaelic Football Age Grade Under 13 (Club) 5th & 6th / P.6 & P.7 Classes (Primary School) The minimum number of games each team will play is……………………………… Start Date ………………………… End Date ……………………………..... Participating Units
1.1 Invitation to Respondents 3 1.2 RFQ Contact 3 1.3 Type of Contract for Deliverables 3 1.4 RFQ Timetable 3 1.5 Submission of Quotations 4 PART 2 – EVALUATION AND AWARD 6 2.1 Stages of Evaluation 6 2.2 Stage I – Mandatory Submission Requirements 6 2.3 Stage II – Evaluation 6 2.4 Stage III – Pricing 6 2.5 Selection of Top-Ranked Respondent 6 PART 3 – TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE RFQ PROCESS 8 3.1 General Information and Instructions 8 3.2 Communication after Issuance of RFQ 9 3.3 Notification and Debriefing 10 3.4 Conflict of Interest and Prohibited Conduct 10 3.5 Confidential Information 12 3.6 Procurement Process Non-Binding 13 3.7 Governing Law and Interpretation 14 APPENDIX A – FORM OF AGREEMENT 15 APPENDIX B – SUBMISSION FORM 16 APPENDIX C – PRICING 19 APPENDIX D – RFQ PARTICULARS 21 A. THE DELIVERABLES 21 B. MATERIAL DISCLOSURES 21 C. MANDATORY SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS 21 D. MANDATORY TECHNICAL 21 E. PRE-CONDITIONS OF AWARD 21 F. RATED CRITERIA 22 APPENDIX E – CERTIFICATE OF CONFIRMATION OF NON-COLLUSION 23 Annex A – Services Agreement Annex B – Pricing Form Annex C - References Annex D – Local References Annex E – Schedule of Floor Areas Annex F – Scope of Works Annex G – Floor Plans of Highlighted Cleaning Areas
Essential Question Were the 1920s really roaring? Document A According to I. W. Burnham, what was one reason the public became more interested in the stock market in the 1920s? Document B According to William Leuchtenburg what was one economic problem of the 1920s? Document C According to Frederick Lewis Allen, what is one way middle-class women’s lives changed in the 1920s? Document D According to Howard Johnson what was one effect of WWI on the black community? According to Howard Johnson, what was one factor that helped the black community during the 1920s? Document E State one criticism that this cartoonist is making about the 1920s generation.
Table : Livestock in GAB SA4 regions, 2013-14 GAB region (ABS SA4) Livestock - Meat cattle - Total (no.) Livestock - Sheep and lambs - Total (no.) Total beef and sheep in region (no.) Darling Downs - Maranoa 2,065,894 748,815 2,814,709 Far West and Orana 748,308 5,491,014 6,239,322 Fitzroy 2,738,238 423 2,738,661 New England and North West 1,543,908 2,958,219 4,502,127 Northern Territory - Outback 2,158,388 2,158,388 Queensland - Outback 4,643,439 1,579,728 6,223,167 South Australia - Outback 252,365 2,807,084 3,059,449 Grand Total 14,150,540 13,585,283 27,735,823 Notes: ABS 7121.0 Table : Gross value of livestock industries in GAB SA4 regions ($ million), 2013-14 GAB region (ABS SA4) Gross value from livestock slaughtered and other disposals - Cattle and calves ($m) Gross value from livestock slaughtered and other disposals - Sheep and lambs ($m) Gross value from Wool ($m) Qld - Darling Downs - Maranoa 630.5 18.7 25.7 NSW - Far West and Orana 203.7 138.8 167.7 Qld - Fitzroy 823.6 0.0 0.0 NSW - New England and North West 425.5 68.4 90.4 Northern Territory - Outback 463.7 0.0 0.0 Queensland - Outback 1410.0 41.7 54.2 South Australia - Outback 84.3 127.3 97.2 Grand Total 4041.1 394.9 435.3 Source: ABS 7503.0
Appendix 2: Water licence information Table : Access Licences and water requirement, GAB NSW Groundwater Source Domestic & Stock Water requirement (ML/yr) Local Water Utility Access Licences Aquifer Access Licences (Share Units) Eastern Recharge 2,000 0 35,006 Southern Recharge 3,000 3,058 25,908 Surat 28,100 3,318 5,527 Warrego 14,300 252 406 Central 4,900 0 39 GAB Surat Shallow 978 50 5,662 GAB Warrego Shallow 650 0 0 GAB Central Shallow 1,162 0 7 Lower Macquarie Zone 3 520 350 8,264 Lower Macquarie Zone 4 215 0 5,103 Lower Macquarie Zone 5 445 0 2,477 Total Estimated total irrigation* Estimated other uses 56,270 7,028 88,399 76,758 11,641 Note: *The NSW Department of Primary Industries identified that irrigation would be the primary use for virtually all of the aquifer access licences in Eastern Recharge, Southern Recharge and the 3 Lower Macquarie zones. The Department suggested that there was no significant irrigation in the other water sources Source: NSW DPI
engagement in Basin issues has also undergone significant changes. The 2000 SMP was signed by relevant state and Australian Government ministers, and in 2000 Ministerial engagement and oversight came under the auspices of the Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council and this function was then undertaken from 2011 by the Standing Council on Environment. However, since the 2013 streamlining of the COAG’s Ministerial Council system there has been no coordinated Ministerial Forum through which Basin water management issues are considered. The responsibilities of the community members of the GABCC has always included providing advice to the relevant Australian and state government ministers and senior agency staff, and to represent the interests of their community groups. The changing governance environment necessitates a consideration of an effective governance arrangement to ensure the active engagement and involvement of community, industry and government to manage Basin water resources. Table 4. Comparison of institutional and governance arrangements across Basins Institutional and Governance Arrangements Basin Element Murray-Darling Basin Lake Eyre Basin Great Artesian Basin Coordinating Instrument Legislation: Water Act 2007, Water Regulations 2008, Basin Plan 2012. Intergovernmental agreements: Basin Agreement 2008, Intergovernmental agreement on implementing water reform in the Basin 2013. Intergovernmental agreement: Lake Eyre Basin Intergovernmental Agreement 2000 (recognised in legislation by the Australian Government in the Lake Eyre Basin Intergovernmental Agreement Act 2001). No specific legislation or intergovernmental agreements. Great Artesian Basin Strategic Management Plan endorsed by Australian Government, state and territory governments. Ministerial Engagement Dedicated Ministerial Council for Basin issues: Murray-Darling Basin Ministerial Council (recognised under the Water Act 2007). Dedicated Ministerial Forum for Lake Eyre Basin issues: Lake Eyre Basin Ministerial Forum (established through Intergovernmental Agreement). No dedicated Ministerial Forum. Prior to 2013 considered as part of successive Ministerial Committees under the COAG framework with mandate for natural resource, environment and water issues.
GABSI to 30 June 2013 - Source: GABCC 2012-13 Annual Report 28,377 2013-14 NSW - Source: Certifications brief cross referenced with the project tables in the signed 2013-14 Implementation Plan. 336 2013-14 SA - Source: Certifications Brief cross referenced with the project tables in the signed 2013-14 Implementation Plan. 3 2013-14 Qld - Source: (provide by State on 4 July 2014) 1,956 2013-14 Total up to 30 June 2014 2,295 GABSI Total up to 30 June 2014 30,672 Estimated Remaining Basin Bore capping and piping work post 30 June 2014 (Source – Great Artesian Basin Sustainability initiative Value for Money report January 2014) State New South Wales Queensland South Australia Total Bores to be controlled 238 180-215 <30 483 Bore drains to be deleted (km) 1,150 5,500 0 6,690 Estimated water saving (ML/annum) 26,600 75,000 365 107,598 Total estimated cost, ($ mil Cwlth, State & landholder) 114 84 1.25 199.25
The Committee The role of the Committee is to provide advice to Australian and State Ministers on community concerns regarding efficient, effective and sustainable whole-of-Basin resource management, and to coordinate activity between stakeholders. The Committee facilitates cooperative and collaborative management of the Basin. It provides independent advice, monitors progress, identifies research needs and liaises with other groups. Membership of the Committee comprises of community and sector representatives. The Committee meets three times each year in a range of locations within New South Wales, Queensland and South Australia. The Committee has the following four Strategic Focus sub-committee, Communications sub-committee, Research and Development sub-committee and Finance Within a cooperative management framework the role of those with a key interest in the water resource of the Great Artesian Basin are identified below. Australian Government The Australian government facilitates the cooperative management of water resources. Federal environment laws apply when actions may affect nationally listed threatened species or ecological communities such as those dependent on GAB natural discharge springs. State and Territory Governments The State and Territory governments manage their respective parts of the Basin under their own laws. Queensland and New South Wales Great Artesian Basin advisory groups report to their respective Ministers and a member from each state group is a representative on the Great Artesian Basin Coordinating Committee. Natural Resource Management boards There are 19 Natural Resource Management boards across the Basin. They address some of the broader natural resource issues, such as weeds and pest animals, arising from the use and management of Basin waters. Water users, land managers and communities Water users, land managers and communities contribute to Basin management by participating in the Great Artesian Basin Sustainability Initiative (GABSI), adopting new technologies, improving land management and industry practices, and participating in water planning. Activities During 2013-14 the Great Artesian Basin Coordinating Committee (the Committee): Held meetings in Canberra (August 2013), Sydney (November 2013) and Moree (March 2014) to discuss the GAB resource study, Great Artesian Basin Sustainability Initiative (GABSI), Bioregional Assessments and general Committee matters. Advised Australian and State government Ministers on various matters and issues relating to the management of the GAB. Strategic Focus Sub-committee met in November 2013 to discuss the GABSI 3 mid-term review, the GABSI Value for
New Biosecurity Act On 16 June 2016 the new Biosecurity Act 2015 commenced and replaced the Quarantine Act 1908. Biosecurity plays a critical role in maintaining the health of Australian agricultural industries and trading relationships. Figure 7 Sniffer dog checking mail. Photo: Department of Agriculture and Water Resources Changing global demands, growing passenger and trade volumes, increasing imports from a growing number of countries, population expansion and climate change mean that biosecurity risk is growing. There is also an increasing demand from international trading partners for greater levels of assurance in relation to Australia’s exports. The benefits of the modern biosecurity system will be realised by industry, government, the environment and international trading partners – with positive flow through effects to the economy more generally. This will be through streamlined business process, productivity improvements and reduced regulatory burden in a seamless and lower cost business environment; emphasising risk–based decision making, the use of intelligence, a single point of regulatory contact and robust partnerships. More information can be found on the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources website . National Landcare Program The Australian Government is investing $1 billion through the National Landcare program, including support for the Landcare Networks, 20 Million Trees and Australia’s 56 regional natural resource management organisations. This funding helps support local environmental and sustainable agriculture projects. There are 19 Natural Resource Management agencies who play a central role in the management of the recharge areas and mound springs of the Basin. During 2014-15 funding was provided to Natural Resource Management agencies to update existing regional natural resource management plans to incorporate climate change ad adaptation approaches. Natural Resource Management bodies have been engaging with local community groups, industry sectors, government agencies and relevant committees on the development of their new plan. Indigenous Rangers – Working on Country The Indigenous Ranger program, which began in 2007, supports Indigenous people to combine traditional knowledge with conservation training to protect and manage their land, sea and culture. Indigenous ranger teams develop partnerships with research, education, philanthropic and commercial organisations to share skills and knowledge, engage with schools and generate additional income and jobs in environment, biosecurity, heritage and other sectors. There are 109 Indigenous ranger groups and 777 full time Indigenous rangers funded under the program in 2016. By achieving employment and environmental outcomes alongside wider social, cultural and economic benefits, Indigenous ranger work is valued by many communities across Australia.
7 T 9/26 Case Study: Probability Excel: Data Management; Pivot Tables 8 R 9/28 Probability Distributions • Histograms, revisited • Types of probability distributions Recitation (HB/DP) PS #4 FPP Ch.3, 18 OIS Ch. 3.1-3.2 9 T 10/3 Conditional Expectations • Cross-tabulation Midterm Review 10 R 10/5 Midterm 1 11 T 10/10 Statistical Inference • Sampling • Significance • Frequentist logic Stata: Workflow and Basics FPP Ch.17,18,20 OIS Ch. 4.1 12 R 10/12 Sampling Distributions: Proportions • LLN, CLT • The Normal Distribution Recitation (HB/DP) PS #5 FPP Ch.21 OIS Ch. 4.4, 6.1 13 T 10/17 Confidence Intervals: Proportions Stata: Descriptive statistics, tests OIS Ch. 4.2 14 R 10/19 Hypothesis Tests: Proportions • Assumptions and Logic • Link with Confidence Intervals Recitation (HB/DP) PS #6 FPP Ch. 26 OIS Ch. 4.3 15 T 10/24 Inference for Means Stata: Practice class concepts FPP Ch.23 OIS Ch. 5.1 16 R 10/26 Inference for Differences Recitation (HB/DP) PS #7 FPP Ch. 27 OIS Ch. 5.3, 6.2 17 T 10/31 Statistical Power Midterm Review OIS Ch. 5.4 18 R 11/2 Midterm 2 19 T 11/7 Regression Analysis I • Correlation • Scatter plots • Bivariate relationships Stata: Graphs FPP Ch.8,9,10 OIS Ch. 7 20 R 11/9 Regression Analysis II • Regression for policy analysis Recitation (HB/DP) PS #8 OIS Ch. 7 21 T 11/14 Case Study: Regression (HB/DP) Stata: Regression 22 R 11/16 Assessing Evidence for Policy • Causal inference • Types of statistical bias Recitation (HB/DP) PS #9 23 T 11/21 Thanksgiving – No Class 24 R 11/23 Thanksgiving – No Class 25 T 11/28 Applied Regression Topics • Multiple regression • Prediction Stata: Regression, Formatting output OIS Ch. 8.1
26 R 11/30 Multiple hypothesis tests • Chi-squared • F-tests • Cherry picking Recitation (HB/DP) Final Exercise FPP Ch.28 OIS Ch. 6.3 27 T 12/5 Statistical Ethics Final Review; Stata Quiz (8pm) FPP Ch.1,2 28 R 12/7 Final Review • Connections across topic Final Review 29 T 12/12 Final Exam Final Exam Period – No Class
Table (3): Effects of mixture of Chitosan and Mos. on feed utilization of Sea bass fed control diet and the experimental diets 2-6 Diets Feed intake g/fish FCR PER PPV% Energy gain (kcal) Energy utilization 1 2 3 4 5 6 6.08±0.017c 6.65±0.12b 7.25±0.29a 7.06±0.09a 6.36±0.09b 6.55±0.07b 2.14±0.10b 2.11±0.04b 2.10±0.07b 2.10±0.05b 1.98±0.01a 1.98±0.02a 1.04±0.05b 1.06±0.01b 1.06±0.04b 1.06±0.02b 1.12±0.01a 1.12±0.02a 19.42±1.15a 16.50±1.47b 17.9±0.8a 16.98±0.07b 17.82±0.60b 17.21±0.50b 4.65±0.05a 4.69±0.46a 4.98±0.07a 4.88±0.19a 4.53±0.29ab 3.93± 0.19b 15.81±0.64 14.76±1.35 14.42±0.9 14.52±0.29 14.93±0.82 14.72±0.71 F MS 51.37** 0.0239 4.60* 0.00297 4.91* 0.000761 3.91* 0.783 6.44** 0.0648 1.05 NS 1Values are mean ± standard deviation. * = (P≤0.05) **= (P≤0.01) Values in the same column with same superscripts are not significantly different. FCR, feed conversion ratio=dry feed fed/body weight gain. FER=feed efficiency ratio. PER=protein efficiency ratio.
lower lobe. Gastrointestinal: No scars; abnormalities in abdominal contour; bowel sounds minimal to absent; liver WNS. Genitourinary: Pt. has an indwelling catheter draining clear amber urine. Current Treatment: Continue with CMV, indwelling catheter, Anticonvulsants to control seizures Corticosteroids or diuretics to reduce swelling Painkillers
KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA, ELURU LIST OF TEXT BOOKS AND NOTE BOOKS FOR CLASS IX 2016-2017 ENGLISH HINDI SANSKRIT MATHS SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES OTHERS IX MAIN COURSE BOOK (IX) LITERATURE READER (IX) WORK BOOK (IX) THREE MEN IN A BOAT (NOVEL) NOTE BOOKS: 200 PAGES SINGLE RULE X 3 (MEDIUM SIZE) KSHITHIJ (A) IX KRUTHIKA(A) IX NOTE BOOKS: SINGLE RULE 200 PAGES X 2 (MEDIUM SIZE) MANIKA (IX) ABHYAS PUSTHIKA (IX) NOTE BOOKS: SINGLE RULE 200 PAGES X 3 MATHEMATICS TEXT BOOK (NCERT)- IX CLASS NOTE BOOKS: 180PAGES WHITE X 4 (LONG SIZE) SCIENCE TEXT BOOK (NCERT)- IXCLASS NOTE BOOKS: 100 PAGES SINGLERULE X 3(LONG SIZE) LABORATORY MANUAL PRACTICAL RECORD-I OBSESRVATION NOTEPAD-I INDIA AND THE CONTEMPORARY WORLD –I (HISTORY) DEMOCRATIC POLITICS (CIVICS) CONTEMPORARY UNDER STANDING ECONOMIC DISASTER 200 PAGES RECORD BOOK (PHYSICAL
Subsidiaries in Conjunction with the Transfer of All of the Interests of PPL Energy Supply, LLC and its Subsidiaries to Talen Energy Corporation; (3) for any Modification or Amendment of Associated Affiliated Interest Agreements; and (4) for any Other Approvals Necessary to Complete the Contemplated Transactions.” Joint Applicants’ Exhibit No. 1, Appendix A – Separation Agreement [HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL treatment is required for the Separation Agreement Schedules (ALL FILED UNDER SEAL)] Joint Applicants’ Exhibit No. 1, Appendix B – Transaction Agreement [HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL treatment is required for the Parent Disclosure Letter and RJS Disclosure Letter (ALL FILED UNDER SEAL)] Joint Applicants’ Exhibit No. 1, Appendix C – Employee Matters Agreement Joint Applicants’ Exhibit No. 1, Appendix D – Organizational chart showing PPL Corp. and its relevant domestic subsidiaries prior to the closing of the Proposed Transaction (June 1, 2014) Joint Applicants’ Exhibit No. 1, Appendix E – Organizational chart showing Riverstone, the RJS Entities and its relevant affiliates prior to the closing of the Proposed Transaction Joint Applicants’ Exhibit No. 1, Appendix F – Organizational chart showing PPL Corp. and its first-tier domestic subsidiaries following the closing of the Proposed Transaction Joint Applicants’ Exhibit No. 1, Appendix G – Organizational chart showing Riverstone, the RJS Entities and relevant affiliates following the closing of the Proposed Transaction Joint Applicants’ Exhibit No. 1, Appendix H (REVISED) – List of properties owned by PPL Energy Supply and/or its subsidiaries that currently are encumbered by PPL EU transmission rights-of-way Joint Applicants’ Exhibit No. 1, Appendix I – List of properties owned by PPL Energy Supply and/or its subsidiaries that currently are encumbered by PPL EU distribution rights-of-way Joint Applicants’ Exhibit No. 1¸ Appendix J (REVISED) – List of properties owned by PPL Energy Supply and/or its subsidiaries at which PPL EU substation facilities are located Joint Applicants’ Exhibit No. 1¸ Appendix K – List of miscellaneous
5 April 2016 Dear Colleague, The next meeting of the East Riding (Holderness) District Committee will be held as follows: Date: Tuesday 19 April 2016 Time: 7.30pm Venue: Easington Community Hall The venue is located at The Square, Easington, HU12 0TU. There is parking available opposite the hall. All Councillors and Clerks are welcome to attend, although only two representatives per Council are invited to vote. The Clerk may be a voting delegate. Please be kind enough to forward the enclosed agenda papers to your Council’s delegates and any other members who may wish to attend. Additional copies of the documentation can be downloaded from the ERNLLCA website. I look forward to meeting your representatives on the 19th. Yours sincerely Alan Barker Executive Officer AGENDA 1 To receive apologies for absence
MSAC Public Summary Document Application No. 1342.1 - Gene expression profiling of 21 genes in breast cancer to quantify the risk of disease recurrence and predict adjuvant chemotherapy benefit Sponsor/Applicant/s: Genomic Health Inc Date of MSAC consideration: MSAC 61st Meeting, 3-4 April 2014 Purpose of application The original application was submitted in November 2012 by Genomic Health Inc. and requested the Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) listing for a 21-gene expression profiling test (Oncotype DX®) in a subset of early breast cancer patients with node negative or up to 3 positive nodes oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+) or progesterone receptor-positive (PR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) disease. Background The application has been previously considered by MSAC in November 2013, which advised the Minister that MSAC did not support public funding. Following MSAC’s consideration, a re-application addressing MSAC’s concerns was submitted by the applicant in February 2014. Prerequisites to implementation of any funding advice The proposed 21-gene expression profiling test is not subject to regulation by the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) as it is conducted in a single laboratory located in California in the United States of America (USA). It is registered only in the USA. The California-based Genomic Health laboratory is certified to perform the proposed 21-gene expression profiling test by the United States’ Centers for Medicare and Medical Service (CMS), is accredited by the College of American Pathologists (CAP) under the USA Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment (CLIA) of 1988, and operates in accordance with USA federal and state laws. Proposal for public funding The original application proposed the following MBS item descriptor. Proposed MBS item descriptor MBS [item number] Pathology Group P7 Genetics
AIR FORCE SCHOOL, BAMRAULI(3017-18) Monthly Split-up Syllabus Class – VIII Subject- Sanskrit Month Name of the book Topic/Subtopic No. of Periods Required No. of Working Days अप्रैल नई दीप मणिका भाग -3 सहायक: योग 10 22 मई नई दीप मणिका भाग -3 04 09 जून नई दीप मणिका भाग -3 मातुल ! 04 08 जुलाई नई दीप मणिका भाग -3 क्रीडाक्षेत्रे भारत्स्य ततो मे 10 25 अगस्त नई दीप मणिका भाग -3 शतकम् काव्यम् 10 25 नई दीप मणिका भाग -3 भक्त: 10 20 अक्टूबर नई दीप मणिका भाग -3 कोडई कनाल: सुधा 10 20 नई दीप मणिका भाग -3 लोभस्य 10 24 नई दीप मणिका भाग -3 परीक्षा रुप + 7 17 जनवरी नई दीप मणिका भाग -3 प्रकाशस्य च 05 15 फरवरी नई दीप मणिका भाग -3
State any two values which Ajay wants to communicate to the society. (5) “Though advertising is one of the most frequently used medium of promotion of goods and services, yet it attracts lot of objections.” Explain any four such objections. (6) Explain the four important elements of marketing mix. (6) ‘Hayaram is a famous chain selling a large variety of products in the Indian market. Their products include chips, biscuits, sweets and squashes. It charges a comparatively higher price than its competitors as it sells quality products. Besides, it offers regular discounts to its customers and easy credit terms to its retailers. It has five of its own retail shops. It also sells its products through grocery stores so that the products are made available to customers at the right place, in the right quantity and at the right time. It regularly uses different communication tools to increase its sales. The above para describes the combination of variables used by Hayaram to prepare its market offering. Identify and explain the variables. (6) As a project-work in business subject, the commerce students ‘creative public school’ thought of setting up a recycling plant to recycle all the waste papers from the school and prepare registers and exercise books to be used by the school students. They approached their principal who not only appreciated the idea of the students but also gave her consent for the sale of register and exercise books to a nearby blind school. Explain any two products related decisions which the children have to take. Suggest any two factors children should keep in mind while choosing the right name for their exercise books and registers. Identify two values communicated to the society by this project of ‘creative public school’. (6)
BID PROPOSAL CERTIFICATIONS Firm Name: _________________________________________________________________________________ Business Address: _____________________________________________________________________________ Telephone Number: ___________________________ Fax Number: _____________________________________ Email: ______________________________________ Federal ID Number: _______________________________ I. General Bid Certification The bidder certifies that he will furnish, at the prices herein quoted, the materials, equipment, and/or services as proposed on this bid. Any deviation to specifications is fully explained and attached. By signing and submitting this bid for consideration to the County of Jefferson, the vendor acknowledges that they have read, understand, and agree to the specifications as presented without reservation or alteration. Deviations: Yes___________ No __________ II. Non-Collusive Bidding Certification By submission of this bid proposal, the bidder certifies that he is complying with Section 103-d of the General Municipal Law as follows: Statement of non-collusion in bids and proposals to political subdivision of the state. Every bid or proposal
(Petersson, Djerf-Pierre, Strömbäck, & Weibull, 2006). These attitudes should be understood in relation to Swedish regulations of electoral advertising on television. TV ads were prohibited before the digitalization of terrestrial television in 2005, and political advertising was therefore not broadcast on major channels until the European parliament election 2009 and the Swedish general election 2010. The election in 2010 can be seen as the breakthrough for electoral advertising on television, since all major parties purchased airtime on the commercial channel TV4 during the last weeks of the campaign (Grusell & Nord, 2010). Even if there was a code of conduct between the broadcaster (TV4) and the political parties in the 2010 campaign, the legal regulations are few. The ads only have to observe the law, which mostly refers to criminal law and facts like incitement to racial hatred or violence. Further, there are no legal limitations for the amount of airtime possible to purchase in order to broadcast political advertising, and there is no announcement before or after the spot is aired. The spots are also broadcast in-between other commercials; there is no block where political ads are aired exclusively. All in all, due to these conditions TV viewers are rather caught by surprise and cannot easily avoid the spots. It is no exaggeration to argue that electoral advertising has changed the Swedish campaign culture. Results showed that exposure to TV ads during the European election campaign had a significant and positive effect on voter turnout (Dahlberg, 2010) and the political parties have changed their way of campaigning in relation to this new campaign channel (Grusell & Nord, 2009). The parties spent approximately two million Euros on producing and purchasing airtime for television ads in the 2010 campaign and 69 percent of the electorate watched at least one commercial during the 2010 campaign (Oscarsson & Holmberg, forthcoming). The corresponding figure during the European parliament campaign was 66 percent (Oscarsson & Holmberg, 2010, p. 26). An intense debate took off the last weeks of the campaign when TV4
Row 2: K9, *P5, K9 Row 4: K2, *P5, K2 Row 6: K2, P5, *K9, P5 (last 2 stitches: K2) Row 8: K2, *P5, K2 Total of 8 rows for 1 pattern Stripes Multiple of 7 (I cast on 28 stitches for squares) Row 1: P2, *K3, P2 Row 2: K2, *P1, K1, P1, K2 Double Andalusian Stitch (also known as Double Fleck Stitch) (2 purl stitches alternating on a knit field; a simple/easy pattern with very nice results!) Multiple of 12 (I used 24 stitches for 7 inch square Row 1: Knit Row 2: *K2, P4 * Row 3: Knit Row 4: P3, *K2, P4 *, end K2, P1 Feather Stitch Multple of 7 (I used 21 stitches for 7 inch square)
Nishit Vijay Shah PREFACE I take this opportunity to present a project report on ‘BPR AS A MEANS OF REINVENTING THE ORGANIZATION: AN OVERVIEW’ and put before the readers some useful information regarding my project. I have made sincere attempts and taken every care to present this topic in a precise and compact form keeping the language as simple as possible.
typically 50% of the sum of tasks, to assure uninterrupted flow of work. Make project sacrosanct, to be changed only by senior management. Behaviors will change gradually in response to such new management policies, which then will produce even better results. You might get some success by focusing on behaviors, but it won’t last. Turning many projects into few priorities with TOC The way to get something done is—quoting the well known Nike footwear ad—to “just do it.” Focus on the task and get it done. For those who work in organizations that rely on programs of projects—multi-project environments where resources are shared across a number of projects—there are usually a lot of things that need to get done. An environment of many projects typically generates many priorities for project resources and managers alike and can make that focus difficult to achieve. Division of attention multiplies task and project lead-time...In an effort to take advantage of valuable new opportunities, multi-project organizations, more often than not, tend to launch projects as soon as they are understood, concurrently with existing projects, simultaneously with other new efforts, and unfortunately too often, without sufficient regard to the capacity of the organization. A common result is that the responsibility for sorting out an array of conflicting priorities often falls to project resources and their managers. One concern coming from this situation is that the resultant locally set priorities may not be in synch with each other or, more importantly, with the global priorities of the larger organization. A common result of trying to deal with this tug-of-war of multiple priorities is the practice of multitasking—assigning resources to more than one significant task during a particular window of time—to try to move all the projects along. In addition, many project teams rely on early starts of projects and their paths of tasks to try to assure and achieve timely project completion. These early starts—also driven partially by the desire to see “progress” on all open projects—often translate to additional pressure on resources to multitask between tasks and between projects. There is pressure to get started on a new task in the in-box, but we’re still working on another task. As a result, these practices of early starts and multitasking have been recognized as common practice in many organizations, and even institutionalized in project management software tools, which
Acronyms ALOP Appropriate level of protection IPPC International Plant Protection Convention NPPO National Plant Protection Organisation OIE World Organisation for Animal Health PRA Pest Risk Analysis SPS Sanitary and Phytosanitary measures WTO World Trade Organisation Glossary of Terms Not complete. I am considering that the first time each term is noted, to put * in the text, or to put the word as bold, to show that it is in the glossary. (It may be better to put this as an annex.) appropriate level of protection Appropriate level of sanitary or phytosanitary protection - The level of protection deemed appropriate by the Member establishing a sanitary or phytosanitary measure to protect human, animal or plant life or health within its territory. (WTO SPS Agreement) NOTE: Many Members otherwise refer to this concept as the "acceptable level of risk". audit Periodic official review to verify that a treatment or Systems Approach is being carried out according to the information stated in the DSS. This review is based on the treatment audit trail. audit trail The necessary and sufficient documentary evidence that a measure is being carried out in accordance with the information stated in the DSS. control point A step in a system where specific procedures can be applied to achieve a defined effect and can be measured, monitored, controlled and corrected [ISPM No. 14, 2002] efficacy (treatment) A defined, measurable, and reproducible effect by a prescribed treatment [ISPM No. 18, 2003] entry (of a pest) Movement of a pest into an area where it is not yet present, or present
METHOD OF MEASUREMENT The yardage to be paid for shall be the number of square yards of pavement area reclaimed in-place in accordance with the plans or Purchase Order, or as amended by Change Order. All bituminous material will be measured by the gallon, and paid from the Liquid Asphalt Materials bid. BASIS OF PAYMENT The unit price bid shall include the cost of furnishing all labor, materials and equipment necessary to complete the work as specified. Payment will be made under one of two options, as outlined on the bid page, at the contract unit price per square yard of reclaimed area: a.) for reclamation only, and b.) for recycling with application of rejuvenating or stabilizing liquid. Bid proposal must include pricing with and without calcium chloride stabilizer or liquid bituminous rejuvenating agent. The Owner will purchase and provide liquids under the Liquid Asphalt Materials bid. Bid proposal must include prices for various depths noted on the Bid Proposal Form. 11c
In Loving Memory In honor of those members of the Washington Pacific District who have joined The Church Triumphant during the past year. Auburn George Kessack Battle Ground Starting Grounds Ruth Green Bethel Lonnie Bird Virginia Campbell Myong Smith Bonney Lake Betty Gendvilas Joyce Montgomery Gwen Leath Camas Larry Ast Roberta Tidland Shirley Townsend Carson Barbara Acker David Dutton Frankie Grammon Dolly Newman Centralia Rubye Bennett Ted Hurst Cara Lobaugh Ken Palmer Enumclaw Jan Meyer Dawn Petellin Lanae Reese Forks Steven Bruce Gig Harbor William Hall Terry Taylor Kalama Evelyn Galloway Kelso Abundant Life June Mason Key Peninsula Key to Life William Wilson Kirkland Life Community Gordon Helliwell Longview Melva Barnett Kenneth Bayles Roberta Page Eileen Wheeler Lynden CrossPoint Cynthia Alexander Marysville Generations Chris Gordon Bob Kelly Eleonore Moore Neil Nesheim Robert Oliphant Mount Vernon Oliva Bergenholtz Viola Koehler Mary Thirtyacre Oak Harbor David Hildreth Lena Mahoney Lucy Sampson Olympia Mountain View Bethann Boettnen Ron Casebier Ron Clark Doris DeBoard Marilyn Walters Ruth Whitcomb Pleasant View Robert Moody Andrea Pratt Puyallup Anna Burr Rev. Robert Ulrich Gordon Wiebe Pauline Wieger Randle Miriam Conklin Renton Beverly Hart Donald Hart Ridgefield Jerry Dobbins John Kessler Blanch Muffett Elmer Muffett Joan Zumstien Seattle First Doris Taylor Seattle North Diana English Faye Moore Sequim Valley Rev. William Haley Snohomish Pearl Higdon South Sound Community Beverly Dykhuizen Tacoma First Rev. Robert Johnson Joanna Massey Richard “Pete” Petersen Rev. Dodd Tremaine Wendy Young Van Zandt Thelma Garrity Vancouver Fourth Plain Patti Baril Rev. Harlan Cannon Kay Moultrie Maxine Nichols Virginia Richtmyer Glen Uskoski Grace Woodbeck Vancouver Hillcrest Judy Pierce Bud Wheeler Vancouver Safe Harbor Lena Spencer Kathy Hughes James Bixby White Salmon Pinecrest Edward Grove Woodland Lewis River Deon Anderson Larna Anderson
DROP INLET NO. DIMENSION A x B RE: ATTACH #1 NO. OF UNITS BID PRICE PER L.F. Precast Cover PER EA. Frame Grate GROSS BID Q 34-1/16" x 36-1/32" 10 Type –F2 Type – F2 R 34-1/16" x 46-1/16 10 Type – F3 Type – F3 S 24" x 32-3/32 20 Type – 11 Type – 11 T 26" x 41-15/16 20 Type – 16 Type – 16 U 34-1/16" x 38" 20 Type - 22 Type - 22 TOTAL GROSS BID TRANSVERSE DRAINAGE INTERCEPTOR UNITS, INCLUDING GRATE EA. ONSITE CORE DRILLING EA. CORE JERSEY BARRIERS 20' NYSDOT approved EA. Left or Right Run Out EA. 27g Part III b PRECAST ROUND DRAINAGE UNITS to include Steps, Sealer and Invert Openings
Since May 30, 2014, three other customers have accepted the $1,500 payment offer. These other affected customers include: KCD Realty, Raymond Welby, Steven Blaschak, all of whom did not file a response to the application. South Mountain Grove neither accepted the $1,500 payment offer, nor responded to the application. At the prehearing conference, the Companies represented that Jerome Fuhr and South Mountain Grove were no longer in the Companies’ systems as active customers. It was averred that South Mountain Grove is no longer an operating business. Even so, the Companies maintained their facilities pending the outcome of this proceeding. To date, three have not accepted the $1,500 offer for entering into a voluntary agreement, including: Fred Lindbuchler, Jr., Jerome Fuhr, and South Mountain Grove. On June 30, 2014, the Office of Consumer Advocate (OCA) filed a Notice of Intervention and Public Statement as well as protests on behalf of Mr. Lindbuchler and Mr. Fuhr. By Notice dated September 4, 2014, these cases were assigned to me and an Initial Prehearing Conference was scheduled for October 9, 2014. The conference was later rescheduled to October 8, 2014, per the request of OCA. A Prehearing Conference was held in these cases on Wednesday, October 8, 2014, in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Mark C. Morrow, Esquire, and Danielle Jouenne, Esquire appeared on behalf of the Companies. Dianne E. Dusman, Esquire and Christy M. Appleby, Esquire, appeared on behalf of OCA. The cases were consolidated for hearing and a procedural schedule was established for the case. On October 22, 2014, Mr. Lindbuchler, Mr. Fuhr, and Company witness David E. Lahoff each submitted Direct Testimonies. On November 5, 2014, Mr. Lindbuchler and Mr. Lahoff submitted Rebuttal Testimonies. The parties agreed to waive cross-examination, and the hearing was held on November 17, 2014 for the purposes of entering the testimony into the record. On November 19, 2014, the 13 page transcript was filed. Briefs were filed on December 5, 2014, and Reply Briefs were filed on December 19, 2014. The record closed on December 19, 2014. FINDINGS OF FACT