Cost and funding breakdown Participant Number Participant short name Estimated eligible costs* Effort (PM) Personnel Costs (€) Other direct costs (€) Indirect costs (€) Total subcontracting costs (€) Total Requested funding (€) TOTAL * In column ‘Effort (PM)’, insert the required person months for the work involved. In column ‘Personnel Costs (€)’, insert your personnel costs for the work involved. In column ‘Other direct costs (€)’, insert any other direct costs, for example material or travel costs. In column ‘Indirect costs (€)’, insert your indirect (overhead) costs; 25 % of all your direct costs. In column “Total subcontracting costs”, insert any costs related to a subcontract you would enter into. Subcontracting costs should be exceptional, well justified and will require the prior written consent of the Cascade funding partner. Please note that you will have to ensure that the subcontractor will comply with all obligations, especially coming from the contract that you will sign with the Cascade funding partner, if successful. Please provide here sufficient justification on what and why you need to subcontract some of your tasks. In column ‘Total costs (€)’, calculate the sum of all your indicated costs. In column ‘Requested funding (€)’, insert your requested EC contribution. You may request up to the total amount allowed by the related open call. The maximum European Commission contribution for industrial experiments per applicant is: Category A – New use cases (Pilots) 60K€ Category B – New extensions (modules) 50K€
Deliverables (brief description and month of delivery) Table 3.1c: List of Deliverables Deliverable (number) Deliverable name Work package number Short name of lead participant Type level Delivery date Table 3.1b: List of work packages Work package No Work Package Title Lead Participant No Lead Participant Short Name Start Month End month Total months Justification of Costs and Resources Please provide a summary of required efforts per WP and per partners using the table below. Please explain the role and expertise of partners and how they match the proposal envisioned activity and the WP of involvement RECOMMENDED 0.5 PAGE
Evaluation Individual evaluation / Consensus (delete as appropriate) Proposal n°: Acronym: Type of activity: FEASIBILITY To what extent does it enrich the TagItSmart ecosystem? How effectively will be the IE managed? Can it be done in time, with the proposed partners and deliver results? Score 1: (Threshold 3/5, weight 1) EXTENDIBILITY To what extent does it enrich the TagItSmart ecosystem? If it is in a similar application domain of the existing use cases or modules, does it offer substantial additional features? Score 2: (Threshold 3/5, weight 1) INNOVATION, IMPACT AND BUSINESS MODEL Does the proposal include a commitment to the commercialization of the technology? To what extent has the proposal the potential to address future/wider challenges in the area. Marketability. To what extent is there an impact through scientific and domain specific specialized domain specific magazines, standard bodies, alliances. Score 3: (Threshold 4.5/7.5, weight 1.5) Total score (1+2+3) Threshold 11,5/17,5 Does this proposal contain ethnical issues that may need further attention? NO YES I declare that, to the best of my knowledge, I have no direct or indirect conflict of interest in the evaluation of this proposal Name: Signature: Date: