zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
other items 15. If item 73940 applies to a patient episode, none of the items in Group P10 applies to any pathology service rendered by the approved pathology authority or approved pathology practitioner who claimed item 73940 in respect of the patient episode. Circumstances in which an item in Group P11 (Specimen referred) does not apply 16. (1) An item in Group P11 does not apply to a referral if: (a) a service in respect of the same patient episode has been carried out by the referring approved pathology authority; and (b) the approved pathology authority to which the referral is made is related to the referring approved pathology authority. 16. (2) An approved pathology authority is related to another approved pathology authority for subrule (1) if: (a) both approved pathology authorities are employed (including employed under contract) by the same person, whether or not the person is also an approved pathology authority; or (b) either of the approved pathology authorities is employed (including employed under contract) by the other; or (c) both approved pathology authorities are corporations and are related corporations within the meaning of the Corporations Act; or (d) the approved pathology authorities are partners (whether or not either or both of the approved pathology authorities are individuals and whether or not other persons are in partnership with either or both of the approved pathology authorities; or (e) both approved pathology authorities are operated by the Commonwealth or an authority of the Commonwealth; or (f) both approved pathology authorities are operated by the same State or internal Territory or an authority of the same State or internal Territory. 16. (3) An item in Group P11 does not apply to a referral if the following common tests are referred either singly or in combination (except if the following items are referred in combination with other items not similarly specified): 65060, 65070, 65120, 66500, 66503, 66506, 66509, 66512, 66536, 66596, 69300, 69303, 69333 or 73527. Abbreviations 17. (1) The abbreviations in Part 4 of this table may be used to identify particular pathology services or groups of pathology services. 17. (2) The names of services or drugs not listed in Part 4 of this table must be written in full.
The Protocol Advisory Sub-Committee (PASC) is a standing sub-committee of MSAC. Its primary objective is the determination of protocols to guide clinical and economic assessments of medical interventions proposed for public funding. Purpose of this document This document is intended to provide a protocol that will be used to guide the assessment of an intervention for a particular population of patients. Protocols are finalised after inviting relevant stakeholders to provide input. The protocol guiding the assessment of the health intervention has been developed using the widely accepted “PICO” approach. The PICO approach involves a clear articulation of the following aspects of the research question that the assessment is intended to answer: Patients – specification of the characteristics of the patients in whom the intervention is to be considered for use; Intervention – specification of the proposed intervention Comparator – specification of the therapy most likely to be replaced by the proposed intervention Outcomes – specification of the health outcomes and the healthcare resources likely to be affected by the introduction of the proposed intervention Purpose of application An application requesting Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) listing primarily of breast MRI to guide treatment in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer was received from Breast Surgeons of Australia and New Zealand Incorporated (BreastSurgANZ) by the Department of Health and Ageing in September 2012. The use of breast MRI is proposed to offer improved local staging and/or early treatment monitoring and planning. The proposed indications are: women newly diagnosed with breast cancer and undergoing preoperative (neo-adjuvant) chemotherapy women newly diagnosed with the lobular subtype of breast cancer women newly diagnosed with breast cancer who are aged <50 years and/or have very dense breasts which preclude mammographic assessment, and/or have a significant size discrepancy (≥1 cm) between mammogram and ultrasound findings have suspicious/malignant calcifications which may underestimate the extent of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) disease
Mulakalacheruvu MCU 09728669 104.41 89.86 86.31 69.50 59.07 50.83 37.26 26.70 22.79 15.17 - Battulapuram BTM 09728668 111.99 97.44 93.89 77.08 66.65 58.41 44.84 34.28 30.37 22.75 7.58 - Tummanamgunta TAT 09728667 120.42 105.87 102.32 85.51 75.08 66.84 53.27 42.71 38.80 31.18 16.01 8.43 - Kurabalakota KBA 09728666 135.51 120.96 117.41 100.60 90.17 81.93 68.36 57.80 53.89 46.27 31.10 23.52 15.09 - Madanapalle Road MPL09728648 144.40 129.85 126.30 109.49 99.06 90.82 77.25 66.69 62.78 55.16 39.99 32.41 23.98 8.89 - Vyalpadu VLD 09728647 151.98 137.43 133.88 117.07 106.64 98.40 84.83 74.27 70.36 62.74 47.57 39.99 31.56 16.47 7.58 -
ASAF ASAF RGPM, RGPM, NLPD 5 KCCS/ RGPM KCCS/ RGPM Pvt RGPM, KZJ,CT RGPM, RGPM, MMZ, MAGH TNGM, NLPD 6 RGPM RGPM Pvt KZJ,CT MMZ, MAGH TNGM, NLPD 7 MCLJ/ JPTN MCLJ Pvt KZJ,CT RGPM, MMZ, MAGH 8 RJCS/MQR CT/KZJ Rly - RGPM, MMZ, MAGH TNGM, NLPD 9 VCSG/ SEM VCSG/ SEM Pvt CT KZJ, TNGM, RJY KZJ, RGPM, MMZ, MAGH CT, KZJ TNGM, TNGM, NLPD 10 MICT/TDU MICT/ TDU Pvt CT KZJ, TNGM, RJY KZJ, RGPM MMZ,MAGH CT, KZJ, TNGM, NLPD 11 RUSG/ BDCR RUSG/ BDCR Pvt KZJ,CT RGPM, MMZ, MAGH TNGM, NLPD 12 PRPI PRPI Pvt MAGH TNGM, NLPD 13 WCF/ NPHR WCF/ NPHR Pvt MMZ, RGPM, MAGH MMZ, MMZ, TNGM, NLPD 14 SPSG/SYI Pvt KZJ,CT RGPM, MMZ, MAGH TNGM, NLPD 15 OPIM/MMZ MMZ Pvt CT RJY MAGH RGPM, TNGM, NLPD 16 KRMR KRMR Rly KZJ,CT RGPM, MMZ, MAGH TNGM, NLPD 17 KZJ KZJ Rly CT RGPM, MMZ, MAGH CT, TNGM, NLPD RJY BTTR GTLW, HGI NLPD, MLK, GTLW, HGI GTLW, HGI MLK, GTLW, HGI GTLW, HGI GTLW,
18 MAGH MAGH Rly MMZ, RGPM, KZJ,CT MMZ, - MMZ, TNGM, NLPD 19 Rly CT RJY - NLPD 20 RLY CT RJY - BTTR NLPD 21 RLY CT RJY - BTTR NLPD 22 TNGM, RLY CT RJY - BTTR NLPD GNT 23 ICLV/ VNUP Pvt CT RJY KZJ, RGPM, MMZ, MAGH BTTR NLPD BZA 24 MNCK/KI MNCK/KI PVT KZJ,TNGM, CT RJY MAGH NLPD, BTTR NLPD 25 PKPK PKPK Pvt VRJN, BTTR, RJY MAGH VRJN, KOU, VRJN VRJN, NLPD 26 COA COA Rly RJY,TNGM, KZJ,CT RJY MAGH RJY, NLPD, RJY, BTTR RJY, NLPD 27 RJY RJY Rly - NLPD, BTTR NLPD 28 KSLK/COA KSLK Pvt KZJ,CT COA, RJY COA, RJY, MAGH COA, RJY, NLPD, MLK, COA, RJY, BTTR COA, RJY, NLPD GTL 29 MPCJ/JUR MPCJ/ JUR Pvt - MLK, NLPD, RJY KZJ, ,MAGH HGI KOU MLK, NLPD GTLW, HGI GTLW,
from 35.8 days to 33.0 days and the increase in the receivable turnover from 10.20 times to 11.06 times. PROBLEMS PROBLEM 8-2A (a) 1. Accounts Receivable 2,800,000 Sales 2,800,000 2. Sales Returns and Allowances 325,000 Accounts Receivable 325,000 3. Cash 2,410,000 Accounts Receivable 2,410,000 4. Accounts Receivable 72,000 Interest Revenue 72,000 5. Allowance for Doubtful Accounts 58,400 Accounts Receivable 58,400 6. Accounts Receivable 5,200 Allowance for Doubtful Accounts 5,200 Cash 5,200 Accounts Receivable 5,200 PROBLEM 8-2A (Continued) (b) Accounts Receivable Date Explanation Ref. Debit Credit Balance Jan. 1 Balance 760,000 1. 2,800,000 3,560,000 2. 325,000 3,235,000 3. 2,410,000 825,000 4. 72,000 897,000 5. 58,400 838,600 6. 5,200 843,800
Dec. 31 Allowance for Doubtful 10,000 Notes Receivable—Young 10,000 (b) Consideration would have to be given as to whether the note should be written off. At the very least, an allowance should be created with respect to the Young Company note, based upon the estimated probability of collection. Interest should not be accrued if it is unlikely to be collected. Question 3: On July 31, 2008, the company’s year end, Diamond Drills had account balances as follows: Accounts receivable $ 340,500 Allowance for doubtful accounts (credit balance) 5,200 The credit department has determined that of the total accounts receivable, $5,900 should be written off. Diamond estimates 95% of remaining accounts receivable will be collected. Instructions: (a) Prepare the entry to write off the accounts as determined by the credit department (b) Calculate the net realizable value of accounts receivable. (c) Prepare the entry required to adjust accounts receivable to their net realizable balance. Solution (a) Allowance for Doubtful Accounts 5,900 Accounts Receivable 5,900 (b) Net realizable value = ($340,000 – 5,900) x 95% = $317,395 (c) Ending Allowance for Doubtful Accounts required is Accounts receivable ($340,000 – 5,900) $ 334,100 Net realizable value 317,395 Correct allowance for Doubtful Accounts 16,705 Credit Unadjusted balance ($5,200 – 5,900) 700 Debit
the Proposed 2015 TRM, the savings values in the two refrigeration protocols were calculated using climate zone 4 and therefore do not need to be updated. Updating Sources The Commission proposed to update a variety of reference sources to provide more accurate information. This includes the following sections: Section 2.2.7 – Furnace Whistle; Section 3.2.1 – HVAC Systems; Section 3.5.1 – High-Efficiency Refrigeration/Freezer Cases; Section 3.5.2 – High-Efficiency Evaporator Fan Motors for Reach-In Refrigerated Cases; Section 3.5.3 – High-Efficiency Evaporator Fan Motors for Walk-In Refrigerated Cases; Section 3.7.2 – Controls: Beverage Machine Controls; Section 3.7.1 – High-Efficiency Ice Machines; Section 3.8.1 – Wall and Ceiling Insulation; Section 3.7.4 – ENERGY STAR Electric Steam Cooker; Section 3.9.2 – Office Equipment – Network Power Management Enabling; Section 3.5.14 – Suction Pipe Insulation for Walk-In Coolers and Freezers; Section 3.5.4 – Controls: Evaporator Fan Controllers; Section 3.6.1 – ENERGY STAR Clothes Washers; Section 3.4.2 – Heat Pump Water Heaters; Section 4.1.1 – Automatic Milker Takeoffs; Section 4.1.4 – Heat Reclaimers; and Section 4.1.6 – Livestock Waterer. a. Comments
Section 3.7.3 – Controls: Snack Machine Controls; Section 3.7.5 – ENERGY STAR Refrigerated Beverage Machine; Section 3.10.1 – Cycling Refrigerated Thermal Mass Dryer; Section 3.10.2 – Air-Entraining Air Nozzle; Section 3.10.3 – No-Loss Condensate Drains; and Section 3.11.1 – ENERGY STAR Servers. The Commission adopts these protocols noting the changes outlined below. Section 3.7.5 – ENERGY STAR Refrigerated Beverage Machine a. Comments Duquesne requests changing the title of Table 3-140 to “Default Beverage Vending Machine Savings.” In addition, Duquesne notes that the default savings for “Equipment Class A” should be 71 kWh instead of 1,422 kWh. b. Disposition The Commission agrees with and adopts Duquesne’s recommendations. Existing Residential EE&C Measure Protocols and Processes The following sections describe clarifications and modifications to existing residential measure protocols: 1. Section 2.1.1 – ENERGY STAR Lighting
determine whether the conduct alleged constitutes a violation of State or Federal law, including the TRA, when it has a matter before it. OAG/OCA Joint Brief at 7. The Joint Complainants distinguish the holdings of MAPSA v. PECO, 1999 Pa. PUC LEXIS 30, and Harrisburg Taxicab & Baggage Co. v. Pa. PUC, 786 A.2d 288, 292-293 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2001), as discussed in the August 20 Order. OAG/OCA Joint Brief at 7-9. The Joint Complainants also argue that the Commission has the authority to determine whether the prices charged to customers by an EGS conform to the EGS’s disclosure statement. Id. at 10. They cite the case of Grmusa v. Dominion Retail, Inc., Docket No. C-2009-2124359 (Order entered April 16, 2010), as a case directly on point for the proposition that the Commission has asserted jurisdiction over the misrepresentation of an EGS when such misrepresentations are related to price quotation. OAG/OCA Joint Brief at 12. Finally, the Joint Complainants assert that the Commission has the authority to order equitable remedies, including restitution. Id. at 13-14. The Joint Complainants refer the Commission to the proceeding at Docket No. C-2012-2427656, involving Energy Service Providers, Inc. d/b/a Pa. Gas & Electric, wherein they discuss, at length, the Commission’s authority and jurisdiction to order refunds. Id. at 13 n. 7. IDT IDT takes the position that the only violation of the TRA that is alleged in the Joint Complaint pertains to the “signed contract” provision at 71 P.S. § 2245(a)(7). This requirement does not, in IDT’s legal opinion, apply to EGSs. Therefore, argues IDT, there is no compelling reason for the Commission to grant interlocutory review. IDT Brief in Opposition at 4.
Resources used to manage patients successfully treated with the proposed intervention Hospitalisation for preterm delivery DRG 060A (vaginal +CCC) State gov’t hospital ? 1 $7,512 Neonate (cost depends on weight) DRG P62Z State gov’t hospital ? 1 $131,650 Hospitalisation for false preterm labour DRG 064A State gov’t + private Public +private hospital ? 1 (may be >1) $2,372 transport costs -air ambulance -road ambulance State gov’t community drug costs - tocolytics (nifidepine, Gov’t PBS hospital 20mg (then 10 mg x 4) bethamethasone Gov’t PBS hospital ? 12 mg magnesium sulphate Gov’t hospital ? 4 g IV (20mins) then 1g/hr for 24 hrs Resources used to manage patients successfully treated with comparator 1, etc Hospitalisation for preterm delivery DRG 060A (vaginal +CCC) State Gov’t hospital ? 1 $7,512 Neonate (cost depends on weight) DRG P62Z State Gov’t hospital ? 1 $131,650 Hospitalisation for false preterm labour DRG 064A State gov’t + private Public + private hospital ? (may be >1) $2,372 Transport costs -air ambulance - road ambulance State gov’t community drug costs - tocolytics (nifidepine, Gov’t PBS hospital 20mg (then 10 mg x 4) bethamethasone Gov’t PBS ? 12 mg magnesium sulphate Gov’t hospital ? 4 g IV (20mins) then 1g/hr for 24 hrs * Include costs relating to both the standard and extended safety net. Table 11 lists the health care resources that may be used in the delivery of the phIGFBP-1 test. Given the similarity of delivery of the phIGFBP-1 test to the fFN, it is expected that similar resources will also be used for delivery of the fFN test with the exception that the cost of the test would be for either the
Title Perform mōteatea Level 4 Credits 15 Purpose People credited with this unit standard are able to demonstrate knowledge of the pūtake and tikanga of mōteatea, and perform mōteatea. Classification Māori Performing Arts > Māori Performance Available grade Achieved, Merit, and Excellence Entry information Recommended skills and knowledge Standards at Level 3 or above from the subfield Reo Māori listed on the Directory of Assessment Standards. Criteria for Merit Demonstrate in-depth knowledge of the pūtake and tikanga of mōteatea, and perform mōteatea with expression and projection. Criteria for Excellence Demonstrate comprehensive knowledge of the pūtake and tikanga of mōteatea, and perform mōteatea with artistic proficiency. Explanatory notes 1 For assessment, it is expected that the original version of the mōteatea is used. The original version refers to the composer’s original work; however, a variant of the original work may be acceptable where it accords with iwi tradition. This is intended to preserve the integrity of the mōteatea and the knowledge within it. 2 For outcome 2, mōteatea are to be performed without the use of aids. 3 Assessment This unit standard is intended for learners of mōteatea and for assessment within a learning situation. However, assessment may take place in a public performance. Assessment of skills may occur in individual or group settings, but each candidate must demonstrate individual competence.
movement refers to expressions of performance such as mahi-ā-ringa, pūkana, ahei, te tū o te tāne me te wahine (i te wā tika); performance refers to the vocal and visual presentation of mōteatea; pūtake refers to the composer, their iwi, and when and why the mōteatea was composed; tikanga refers to the meaning, values, and Māori world view; wana refers to the excitement generated by a performer or performance; wehi refers to the awe in which charismatic performers or performances are held. Outcomes and evidence requirements Outcome 1 Demonstrate knowledge of the pūtake and tikanga of mōteatea. Evidence requirements 1.1 Pūtake and tikanga of mōteatea from different categories are described in accordance with iwi traditions. Range categories of mōteatea may include but are not limited to – oriori, pao, pātere, waiata aroha, waiata tangi; evidence of five mōteatea, each from different categories, is required. Outcome 2 Perform mōteatea. Range evidence of five mōteatea, each from different categories, is required. Evidence requirements 2.1 Mōteatea is performed in accordance with iwi tradition, and/or the pūtake of the mōteatea. 2.2 Mōteatea is performed displaying evidence of ihi, wehi, and wana. Planned review date 31 December 2016 Status information and last date for assessment for superseded versions Process Version Date Last Date for Assessment Registration 1 23 January 1998 31 December 2013 Review 2 21 November 2001 31 December 2013 Review 3 24 September 2003 31 December 2013 Review 4 21 June 2012 N/A
19.Haluaghat, Mymensingh 20.Birol, Dinajpur D) River Port: Narayangonj. E) ICD, Kamalapur,Dhaka. List of Point of Entry Points are updated but not uploaded. 6. List of regulated pests: We have taken program for conducting surveillance and listing of pests. After the completion of listing of pests and survey we will include all the quarantine and regulated non-quarantine pest in our rules and will make available to all. Currently we have regulated pests on limited crops. The lists are shown below: SL NO. CROPS NAME & SCIENTIFIC NAME RESTRICTIONS OR PROHIBITIONS OF PEST 1 Potato (Solanum tuberosum) Black Wart (Synchytrium endobioticum), Golden Nematode (Globodera rostochiensis), Colorado Potato Beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata). 2 Rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) American Leaf Blight (Microcyclus ulei), Phytophthora Botryoisa 3 Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) Sugarcane Mosaic Virus, Sugarcane Fiji disease, Pine apple disease (Ceratocystis paradoxa), Sereh disease, Ratoon virus, Grassy Shoot Virus, Gummosis (Xanthomonas vasculorum) 4 Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) Tobacco moth, Ephestia elutella 5 Citrus (Citrus sp.) Malsecco (Deuterophoma tracheiphila) 6 Coffee (Cofea imiles) Coffee rust (Hemileia vastatrix), Coffee borer (Stephanoderes
Annexure-I SN Year Name of the Client & Address Value (in Rs.) Contract Period Area Covered /day Performance Certificate * List of Security Works (of Comparable Level) completed in last 3 (three) years, with Performance Certificates from Clients. *PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN (On Official Pad) SN Parameters Remarks 1 Total numbers of Security Guard employed/day
Civil Servant Upper Grade 2nd Division lived 1891 Lisnacree, Forrester Road. 363) Geo GIBB teacher b 29.3.1821 d 21.12.1893, w Alison S HUNTER b 4.10.1819 d 17.6.1893, dau Alison Thomson b 30.3.1854 d 23.1.1939 (h late N.G. BERTRAM). George Gibb 1891 Janefield, now the site of Ladywell Health Centre. 364) i m o Wm MITCHELL d Cors 14.12.1927 72, 1w Emma MARSHALL d Pinkhill 12.12.1893 40, 2w Jane HALFPENNY d Pinkhill 13.1.1915 55, Nursery foreman 1891 Pinkhill Cottage. 365) Geo McDOUGALL Cors d 26.2.1897 70, w Isa FLEMING d 29.10.1894 69, Retired farmer Manse Road 1891. 366) (cross broken) Jas PLATT d 8.5.1895 52. Commercial Traveller born in England: Clermiston Road 1891. 367) (urn on top) Thos DICK d 4.9.1895 80, w Rachel LAW d 18 Bonaly Road Edinburgh 21.6.1902 79, s Jas d 14.11.1914 58, (w Christina SMEALL d 29.12.1919 61). 1870 dairy owner Medwyn Bank, Gylemuir Road. 368) Alex CLARK d 26.11.1941 83, w Margt KERR d 27.6.1950 88, s John d inf, dau Margt d 28.7.1970 67. 369) Col Chas Simeon NOBLE, Bengal Staff Corps d Edin 18.4.1916 76, w Annie Georgina d Innerwick Murrayfield 21.7.1896 (fa Capt Arch HAY), 7 chn, eldest chd Araby d Edin 14.7.1912, 2nd s Capt Fred Burnaby, R.N. d 8.7.1946. 370) Thos SHIELS d 10.9.1927 77, w Agnes d 31.12.1927 73, s Jas d Glasgow 9. 1906 28, chn Lillias, Thos, Wm d inf. 371) (cross: broken) Dora 15.2.1897; Barbara 2.6.1898.
Title Perform haka Level 4 Credits 15 Purpose People credited with this unit standard are able to demonstrate knowledge of the pūtake and tikanga of haka, and perform haka. Classification Māori Performing Arts > Māori Performance Available grade Achieved, Merit, and Excellence Entry information Recommended skills and knowledge Standards at Level 3 or above from the subfield Reo Māori listed on the Directory of Assessment Standards. Criteria for Merit Demonstrate in-depth knowledge of the pūtake and tikanga of haka, and perform haka with expression and projection. Criteria for Excellence Demonstrate comprehensive knowledge of the pūtake and tikanga of haka, and perform haka with artistic proficiency. Explanatory notes 1 For assessment it is expected that the original version of the haka is used. The original version refers to the composer’s original work; however, a variant of the original work may be acceptable where it accords with iwi tradition. This is intended to preserve the integrity of the haka and the knowledge within it. 2 For outcome 2, haka are to be performed without the use of aids. 3 Assessment This unit standard is intended for learners of haka and for assessment within a learning situation. However, assessment may take place in a public performance. Assessment of skills may occur in individual or group settings, but each candidate must demonstrate individual competence.
ATLANTIS 21-02 NSF #OCE-1031050 AT 21-02 (Van Dover, Chief Scientist) Leg 1: Barbados to Orenoque A, Orenoque B Leg 2: Barbados to El Pilar, Manon, Atalante Site Dominant Bivalve Latitude (N) Longitude (W) Depth (m) Other El Pilar Bathymodiolus B 11°14.0 59° 20.75 1190 150 m x 15 m, Dome 2 Orenoque A Bathymodiolus B 10° 19.67 58° 53.325 1700 280 m x 45 m Orenoque B Bathymodiolus A 10° 19.8 58° 37.4 2000 50 m patch, Dome 13 Manon Calyptogena 13° 46.7 57° 32.6 5000 100 m diameter Atalante Calyptogena 13° 49.7 57° 38.8 5000 600 m x 1000 m Preliminary Cruise Plan (Jason daytime scenario) JUNE 0000-0400 0400-0800 0800-1200 1200-1600 1600-2000 2000-2400 1 Transit (180 nmi) Transit Transit Transit 2 Transit ORQUE A Multibeam CHIRP ORQUE A Mooring Recovery/CTD ORQUE A Jason ORQUE A Jason ORQUE A Jason ORQUE A MOCNESS 3 ORQUE A MOCNESS ORQUE A Multibeam CHIRP ORQUE A Jason ORQUE A Jason ORQUE A Jason ORQUE A MOCNESS 4 ORQUE A MOCNESS CTD Transit (15 nmi) ORQUE B Mooring Recovery/CTD ORQUE B Multibeam CHIRP ORQUE B Jason ORQUE B Jason ORQUE B Jason 5 ORQUE B MOCNESS ORQUE B MOCNESS CTD ORQUE B Jason ORQUE B Jason ORQUE B Jason ORQUE B Jason 6 ORQUE B MOCNESS ORQUE B MOCNESS CTD Transit (180 nmi) Transit Transit Transit 7 Transit TRANSFER Transit (113 nmi) Transit Transit El Pilar Multibeam CHIRP 8 El Pilar Multibeam El Pilar Mooring El Pilar Jason El Pilar Jason El Pilar Jason El Pilar MOCNESS
CHIRP Recovery/CTD 9 El Pilar MOCNESS El Pilar Multibeam CHIRP El Pilar Jason El Pilar Jason El Pilar Jason El Pilar Jason 10 El Pilar MOCNESS El Pilar MOCNESS El Pilar Jason El Pilar Jason El Pilar Jason Transit (160 nmi) 11 Transit Transit Transit Transit Manon Multibeam CHIRP Manon MOCNESS 12 Manon MOCNESS CTD Manon Multibeam CHIRP Manon Jason Manon Jason Manon Jason Manon MOCNESS 13 Manon MOCNESS Manon MOCNESS Manon Jason Manon Jason Manon Jason Transit (50 nmi) 12 Atalante Multibeam CHIRP Atalante Multibeam CHIRP/CTD Atalante Jason Atalante Jason Atalante Jason Atalante MOCNESS 14 Atalante MOCNESS CTD Atalante Multibeam CHIRP/CTD Atalante Jason Atalante Jason Atalante Jason Atalante MOCNESS 15 Atalante MOCNESS Atalante Multibeam CHIRP/CTD Atalante Jason Atalante Jason Atalante Jason CONTINGENCY 16 CONTINGENCY CONTINGENCY CONTINGENCY CONTINGENCY CONTINGENCY ENGINEERING PLACE HOLDER 17 ENGINEERING PLACE HOLDER ENGINEERING PLACE HOLDER ENGINEERING PLACE HOLDER ENGINEERING PLACE HOLDER ENGINEERING PLACE HOLDER Transit (120 nmi) 18 Transit Transit BARBADOS SCIENCE PERSONNEL (valid passport required) BERTHS Leg 1 Leg 2 1 Van Dover Van Dover 2 Cunningham Ball 3 Carlson Clarke 4 Neigel TBD 5 LaBella LaBella 6 Plouviez Plouviez 7 Jacobsen Jacobsen 8 Jollivet Jollivet 9 TBD TBD 10 Brothers Brothers 11 Coryell-Martin Coryell-Martin 12 Eggleston He 13 Ashlee Lillis Ashlee Lillis 14 Jessica Lowder Puckett 15 Zambon Zambon 16 Young Maslakova
‘Selection 75’ was for pastureland, range seeding, hay production, wildlife food and cover. ‘TEM-LD1’ was released in 1991 by USDA ARS and Texas Agriculture Experiment Station. was selected for rapid germination from the ‘Selection 75’ plant release. ‘TEM-SR1’ was released in 1992 by USDA ARS. ‘TEM-SR1’ was selected for seed shatter resistance. ‘Verde’ was released from Texas Agriculture Experiment Station and the in 1982. ‘Verde’ was selected for increase seed size. ‘OKPC-1’was released by the Oklahoma Agriculture Experiment Station in 1982. ‘OKPC-1’ was selected for increased cold tolerance. Prepared By and Species Coordinator: Rudy G. Esquivel, , Edited: 080916jsp For more information about this and other plants, please contact your local NRCS field office or Conservation District, and visit the PLANTS Web site<> or the Plant Materials Program Web site <> The Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call 202-720-5964 (voice or TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Read about .
Pests and Potential Problems None Known Environmental Concerns None Known Control Knotgrass can become a serious weed in direct-seeded rice fields under favorable conditions. Please contact your local agricultural extension specialist or county weed specialist to learn what works best in your area and how to use it safely. Always read label and safety instructions for each control method. Trade names and control measures appear in this document only to provide specific information. USDA NRCS does not guarantee or warranty the products and control methods named, and other products may be equally effective. Cultivars, Improved, and Selected Materials (and area of origin) None Prepared By: Brandon Carr, USDA NRCS James E. “Bud” Smith Plant Materials Center, Knox City, Texas Citation Carr, C. 2010. Plant Fact Sheet for Knotgrass (Paspalum distichum). USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, James E. “Bud” Smith Plant Materials Center. Knox City, TX 79529 Published: August 2010 Edited: 30Jul2010 bc, For more information about this and other plants, please contact your local NRCS field office or Conservation District <>, and visit the PLANTS Web site <> or the Plant Materials Program Web site <> USDA IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY PROVIDER AND EMPLOYER
Citation Ugiansky, R. 2010. Plant fact sheet for downy rattlesnake plantain (Goodyera pubescens). USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Norman A. Berg National Plant Materials Center. Beltsville, MD 20705. Published: February, 2010 Edited: For more information about this and other plants, please contact your local NRCS field office or Conservation District <>, and visit the PLANTS Web site <> or the Plant Materials Program Web site <> USDA IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY PROVIDER AND EMPLOYER
Name Current Post Contact Details (phone/email) Department(s) of interest (please tick all that apply) Any Cabinet Office Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy Department for Communities and Local Government Department for Culture, Media & Sport Department for Education Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA) Department for Exiting the European Union Department for International Development Department for International Trade Department for Transport Department for Work & Pensions Department of Health HM Revenue & Customs HM Treasury Home Office Ministry of Defence Ministry of Justice No. 10 Office for National Statistics Scottish Government Welsh Government Other, please specify: Preferred move time Level of post Required Entry Mid Senior Final Any Location(s) of interest (please tick all that apply) Any Any South England London Titchfield Bristol Any North England North East Yorkshire & Humberside Scotland Wales Other (please specify) Flexible working requirements
Prepared By & Species Coordinator: , , Edited: 05Feb2002 JLK; 060816 jsp For more information about this and other plants, please contact your local NRCS field office or Conservation District, and visit the PLANTS Web site<> or the Plant Materials Program Web site <> The Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call 202-720-5964 (voice or TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Read about .
Edited: 05Feb2002 JLK; 060817 jsp For more information about this and other plants, please contact your local NRCS field office or Conservation District, and visit the PLANTS Web site<> or the Plant Materials Program Web site <> The Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call 202-720-5964 (voice or TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Read about .
national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call 202-720-5964 (voice or TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Read about .
There are no environmental concerns or probability of this plant becoming a weed problem in cultivated agricultural systems or pasture lands. Rock (1981) however, indicates that Heliopsis may spread widely and has the tendency to become weedy in landscape settings. Cultivars, Improved, and Selected Materials (and area of origin) ‘Midas’ was released by the Manhattan, Kansas Plant Materials Center (PMC) in 1984. It is recommended for the more western extent of the native range of this species. Northern, central and southern Iowa source identified materials were released in the mid and late 1990’s by the Elsberry, Missouri Plant Materials Center. Prepared by: Christine Taliga; Plant Materials Specialist, USDA NRCS, Denver, Colorado. Richard L. Wynia; Plant Center Manager, USDA NRCS Manhattan Plant Materials Center, Manhattan, Kansas. Shawn V. Belt; Horticulturist, USDA NRCS, Norman A. Berg National Plant Materials Center, Beltsville, Maryland. Citation Taliga, C.E., R.L.Wynia, S.V. Belt. 2012. Plant Fact Sheet for false sunflower (Heliopsis helianthoides (L.) Sweet). USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Denver State Office. Denver CO., 80225-0426. Published September 2012 Edited: 10Sep2012jld, 10Sep2012cga For more information about this and other plants, please contact your local NRCS field office or Conservation District <>, and visit the PLANTS Web site <> or the Plant Materials Program Web site <> USDA IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY PROVIDER AND EMPLOYER
area and how to use it safely. Always read label and safety instructions for each control method. Cultivars, Improved, and Selected Materials (and area of origin) There are no recommended cultivars or selected materials at this time. Prepared By: Samantha Kirk and Shawn Belt NRCS, Norman A. Berg National Plant Materials Center, Beltsville, MD Citation Kirk, S. and S.Belt. 2010. Plant fact sheet for blue vervain (Verbena hastata). USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Norman A. Berg National Plant Materials Center. . Published: [February, 2011] Edited: [07Mar2010smk, 20Dec2010svb] For more information about this and other plants, please contact your local NRCS field office or Conservation District <>, and visit the PLANTS Web site <> or the Plant Materials Program Web site <> USDA IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY PROVIDER AND EMPLOYER
1989 6 0.48 -- -- -- -- 0.48 102 0.24 98 1991 43 3.12 0.24 147 -- -- 3.12 114 2.88 114 1996 65 7.44 2.64 107 2.64 104 4.8 107 4.32 108 1999 61 4.32 2.16 96 3.12 89 2.16 79 0.96 74 2005 87 6.48 1.92 91 3.6 84 4.56 86 1.68 90 2008 46 3.36 1.2 120 1.2 108 2.16 89 1.68 90 2009 70 5.21 1.58 100 1.4 87 3.6 87 2.86 89 Table 11. Total Number (No.), Fish Per Net Night (C/f), and Relative Weights (Wr) by Size Groups of Channel Catfish Collected by Gill Netting from Fort Gibson Lake. Total < 12 in. 8 – 16 in. > 12 in. > 16 in. Year No. C/f C/f Wr C/f Wr C/f Wr C/f Wr 1982 310 15.36 7.92 97 10.8 92 7.44 95 3.36 104 1984 175 12.96 8.4 95 7.92 89 4.32 89 1.44 98
1987 146 11.04 5.04 90 -- -- 6 86 2.88 89 1989 202 15.36 6.72 92 -- -- 8.64 87 3.84 92 1991 291 21.6 6.48 107 -- -- 15.36 95 6.72 102 1996 70 7.92 5.28 95 4.8 87 2.64 92 1.44 101 1999 170 12 7.92 87 8.64 84 4.08 86 2.16 90 2005 144 10.8 6.96 87 8.16 85 3.84 86 1.44 94 2008 115 8.88 4.08 90 7.2 86 4.8 84 1.68 89 2009 50 3.65 1.1 103 2.26 85 2.6 88 1.03 96 Table 12. Total Number (No.), Fish Per Net Night (C/f), and Relative Weights (Wr) by Size Groups of Flathead Catfish Collected by Gill Netting from Fort Gibson Lake. Total > 12 in. > 20 in. > 24 in. > 28 in. Year No. C/f C/f Wr C/f Wr C/f Wr C/f Wr 1982 5 0.24 0.24 106 0.24 112 0.24 106 -- -- 1984 4 0.24 0.24 118 0.24 118 0.24 118 0.24 120 1987 5 0.48 0.48 97 0.48 97 0.24 97 0.24 62 1989 9 0.72 0.72 109 0.48 112 0.24 113 0.24 115 1991 8 0.72 0.48 109 0.48 109 0.24 105 0.24 93 1996 5 0.48 0.48 112 0.48 111 0.24 111 0.24 114 1999 3 0.24 0.24 138 0.24 161 0.24 161 0.24 122 2005 4 0.24 0.24 96 0.24 94 0.24 85 -- -- 2008 5 0.48 0.48 93 0.24 91 0.24 86 -- -- 2009 5 0.36 0.36 94 0.14 85 0.14 85 -- --
Assignment Assignment 1.Roles and (500 words) 1. Exploration of pastoral and academic support for learners (750 words or equivalent) 1. Assessment portfolio for three assessment activities completed with trainees’ learners. Examples of feedback given. Evaluation of feedback to learners with action points for personal development (2000 words) 1. Action Research Proposal 1. Peer and written evaluation 1. Written report on negotiated contemporary issue (2500 words Cert Ed; 3500 words PGCE)) 2.Written assignment (750 words or Know your learners on behaviour 2. Written justification addressing a scheme of work (2000 words) 2. Final written report of research activity and research journal (3500 words Cert Ed; 4000 words PGCE) 2. Summative - electronic (15 mins) 2. Academic poster Presented to peer group journal & written reflection and evaluation (1000 words) Portfolio Portfolio Portfolio Teaching practice portfolio (mini and micro teaches) Teaching practice portfolio following contents list, incl.75 hrs teaching and Teaching practice portfolio following contents list, incl.75 hrs teaching and
Grapes - The growing church, wine, Wheat – Good health and bountiful harvest Triangles – Holy Trinity Cross – Ancient symbol of good luck Rakes – Good husbandry and prosperity Ladders – Prayers, ascent to heaven Diamonds – Knowledge Water – Wealth, bountiful harvest Curls/Spirals – Defense and protection Meandering line – Everlasting life Sun – Life, growth and good fortune Star – God’s love towards man, purity and life. Bring this Onsite Packet Emergency Information For Any Fire or Medical Emergency Dial 911 There is a phone for emergency use in the Interpretive Specialist’s Office. ENVIRONMENTAL LIVING PROGRAM
Russian Alphabet Russian Phrases The symbol [‘] denotes stress on that syllable. Knowing where stress should lie makes words much easier to pronounce. [u] = “oo” sound as in boot [i] = ‘ee’ sound as in see [ai] = “i” as in “hi” [ui] = as in weed (or French ”pfui”) [ “] = “softens” preceding consonant. It helps to smile as you pronounce it. English Transliteration Hello Zdrahv’stvui tye Hi Pree-vyet’ Goodbye Das ve dan’ya Good morning Dob ro ye U’tro Good afternoon Dobri Dien Good evening Dobri Vech’er Thank you Spah si’ba You’re Welcome Pa zhal’e sta How are you? Kak day la’? Good Hor e show’ May I? Moazh’nah I am from California. Ya iz Kaliforn’ii Yes, No Dah, Nyet This, This is E’tah Peace Mir
LP1/6 To understand an alternative use of the rubbing in method. To produce a batch of shortbread biscuits that is uniform in shape and size. To show understanding of the function of the main ingredients. Learn how to weigh solids accurately as well as learn about the cooker. Use a range of basic equipment correctly and safely. Develop time management skills – managing the lesson time to produce a quality food product Peer assessment of practical work Written Homework: Evaluation of Shortbread biscuits. Practical Homework 250 g Digestive Biscuits 175 g Butter / Margarine 125 g Mixed Dried Fruit or standard packet of Maltesers (37g) 125 g Castor Sugar 1 tbsp Cocoa Powder 150g Chocolate Bars - Dairy Milk or Cooking Chocolate Chocolate Strands 8” Sandiwch tin or plastic container. LP1/7 To understand the melting method. To produce a Mud Pie that is uniform and finished to a high standard. Learn how to design a number of ideas for pupils own batch of fairy cakes. Use a range of basic equipment as well as the cooker correctly and safely. Develop time management skills – managing the lesson time to produce a quality food product Peer assessment of practical work Written Homework: Evaluation of Mud Pie Practical Homework: 125 g Self Raising Flour 125 g Butter / Margarine 125 g Castor Sugar 1 tsp Vanilla Essence 2 eggs 12 Paper Bun Cases Tin with lid to take the cakes home in. LP1/8 To understand the All- in- one method and alternative methods. To produce a batch of Fairy cakes that is uniform and decorated using a variety of decorative techniques to a high standard. Use a range of basic equipment as well as the cooker correctly and safely. Develop time management skills – managing the lesson time to produce a quality food product Peer assessment of practical work Written Homework: Evaluation of Fairy Cakes Practical Homework: 200g Plain Flour, 25g Cocoa Powder, 1tbsp Baking Powder, ½ tsp salt, 1tsp Vanilla 115g Caster Sugar, 100 g Chocolate chips,2 eggs,225ml Milk, 100ml Oil Paper Muffin Cases. Container to take muffins home in.
What does it mean if a food has low protein quality? Give some examples of low quality protein foods. What is a limiting amino acid? What is protein complementation? What is kwashiorkor? What is marasmus? Non traditional diets. Define each diet and list pros and cons for each. Pescatarian Lacto-ovo-vegetarian Lacto-vegetarian Vegan Paleo
Asheville Regional Office Water Quality Section 2090 US Highway 70 Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778 (828) 296-4500 (828) 299-7043 Fax Avery, Buncombe, Burke, Caldwell, Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Haywood, Henderson, Jackson, Macon, Madison, McDowell, Mitchell, Polk, Rutherford, Swain, Transylvania, Yancey Fayetteville Regional Office Water Quality Section 225 Green Street Suite 714 Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5094 (910) 433-3300 (910) 486-0707 Fax Anson, Bladen, Cumberland, Harnett, Hoke, Montgomery, Moore, Robeson, Richmond, Sampson, Scotland Mooresville Regional Office Water Quality Section 610 E. Center Avenue Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 (704) 663-1699 (704) 663-6040 Fax Alexander, Cabarrus, Catawba, Cleveland, Gaston, Iredell, Lincoln, Mecklenburg, Rowan, Stanly, Union Raleigh Regional Office Water Quality Section 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628 (919) 791-4200 (919) 788-7159 Fax Chatham, Durham, Edgecombe, Franklin, Granville, Halifax, Johnston, Lee, Nash, Northampton, Orange, Person, Vance, Wake, Warren, Wilson Washington Regional Office Water Quality Section 943 Washington Square Mall Washington, North Carolina 27889 (252) 946-6481 (252) 975-3716 Fax Beaufort, Bertie, Camden, Chowan, Craven, Currituck, Dare, Gates, Greene, Hertford, Hyde, Jones, Lenoir, Martin, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Perquimans, Pitt, Tyrrell, Washington, Wayne Wilmington Regional Office Water Quality Section 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 (910) 796-7215 (910) 350-2004 Fax Brunswick, Carteret, Columbus, Duplin, New Hanover, Onslow, Pender Winston-Salem Regional Office Water Quality Section 450 W. Hanes Mill Road Suite 300 Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105 (336) 776-9800 Alamance, Alleghany, Ashe, Caswell, Davidson, Davie, Forsyth, Guilford, Rockingham, Randolph, Stokes, Surry, Watauga, Wilkes, Yadkin
30 September 2016 - (4,473) (1,203) (1,247) Debenture loans from related parties In BGN’000 Amounts received/ (paid) Amounts (paid)/ refunded Interest (expenses)/ income Interest paid Persons exercising control within the meaning of IAS 24 30 September 2017 - - (976) (551) Persons exercising control within the meaning of IAS 24 30 September 2016 - - (833) (552) Key management staff 30 September 2017 - - (1) (1) Key management staff 30 September 2016 - - (1) (1) Entities under common control of the persons exercising control within the meaning of IAS 24 (according to paragraph I) 30 September 2017 - - (370) (340) Entities under common control of the persons exercising control within the meaning of IAS 24 (according to paragraph I) 30 September 2016 - - (515) (341) 30 September 2017 - - (1,347) (892) 30 September 2016 - - (1,349) (894) Loans from related parties included in trade and other payables In BGN’000 Amounts received/ (paid) Amounts (paid)/ refunded Interest (expenses)/ income Interest paid Persons exercising control within the meaning of IAS 24 30 September 2017 793 (786) (306) (268) Persons exercising control within the meaning of IAS 24 30 September 2016 1,897 (864) (119) (108) Entities under common control of the persons exercising control within the meaning of IAS 24 (according to paragraph I) 30 September 2017 - (59) (52) (59) Entities under common control of the persons exercising control within the meaning of IAS 24 (according to paragraph I) 30 September 2016 509 (11) (62) (47)
FTA Survey (on behalf of Department of Commerce, Govt. of India) Name and Designation: _____________________________________________________________________ E-mail: _____________________________________________________________________ Contact no. _____________________________________________________________________ A. Introductory details Name/ Address of the company IEC no. No. of Employees Sector(s) Exports as % of revenues (Tick the Relevant) 0-10 % 11-25% 26 -50% Above 50% 100% B. Awareness and Support requirements on FTAs (on a scale of 1 to 5 with 1= not at all, 2=very marginally, 3= marginally, 4= significantly and 5= very significantly) S. No Question ASEAN Japan Korea Malaysia Singapore 1 Are there adequate outreach and awareness-raising meetings about the benefits of FTAs?
FTA audit Data collection sheet – round 1 FTA count Day of week AM/PM/Eve Reason for FTA/late cancellation Duration of appointment Amount of notice given Appointment offered to another pt (yes/no) Regular attender (yes/no) Treatment type
Ministry of Transport Pacific Railway Concession Atlantic Railway Concession Rafael Nuñez Airport Concession – Cartagena Concession Airports San Andes and Providencia Ernesto Cortissoz Airport-Barranquilla. Airport Concession Alfonso Banilla Aragon Airport Concession – Cali Northeast Airports Concession El Dorado Airport Concession – Bogotá DC Waterway Action Plan for the Amazon Basin Geographic For additional information contact: Luz Marina Ramirez – 3240800 Ext. 1425 Email: Integrated Mass Transit Systems: Transmetro (Ottawa) Transcaribe (Cartagena) Metrolinea (Bucaramanga) Metroplus (Medellin) Megabus (Pereira) Transmilenio (Bogotá y Soacha) Mio (Cali) For more information contact: Pablo Alejandro Montenegro Email: or Maria Fernanda Lucero – 3240800 Ext. 1466 Email: Regional Autonomous Corporation of Rio Grande de Magdalena: Construction and adequate rehabilitation and modernization of facilities for the transportation of passengers and passenger docks. Maintaining the Magdalena River Waterway Design and construction work of environmental conditioning system and navigation Dock Canal Phase I.
In 2011, panama imports totaled $20,340,829,260 being Japan was Panama’s primary source of imports with 25.3% of total imports followed by China 23.0%, 18.1%, 13%, and 6.0%. 2011 Panama Imports From World Countries Product Imports Value in Dollars $ Product Imports Value in Dollars $ $100,005,026 $1,232,054,734 $325,041,195 $269,431,775 $67,465,893 $202,432,636 $1,085,288,904 $982,983,052 $118,551,247 $3,236,430,683 $5,843,081,097 $1,356,897,042 $772,071,091 $461,298,757 $285,926,756 $5,538,836 $67,043,967 $738,407,297 $319,056,915 $3,062,726 $2,852,121,386 $16,638,245 Total $20,340,829,260
Round 3: Grand Final Part 1: Skeleton Argument Understanding of the law (max 10 points) Coherence of arguments (max 10 points) Clarity of expression (max 10 points) Presentation (max 10 points) Compliance with requirements (max 10 points) Total score Skeleton Argument Subtotal score Part 2: Moot Content of oral argument (max 5 points each) Response to questioning (max 5 points each) Structure and strategy (max 5 points each) Style and presentation (max 5 points each) Courtroom etiquette (max 5 points each) Total score Leading counsel Junior counsel Subtotal score Total score
Granby, CO 80446 WCT Work Capacity Test May 27, 2015 8:30 (Wed) Slots Filled on 1st to Reserve Basis $0.00 Arapaho-Roosevelt NF & Pawnee NG (ARP) West Zone Sulphur RD Middle Park High School 795 North 2nd Street Granby, CO 80446 Todd Camm 970-887-4128 WCT Work Capacity Test May 29, 2015 8:30 (Fri) Slots Filled on 1st to Reserve Basis $0.00 Arapaho-Roosevelt NF & Pawnee NG (ARP) North Zone Canyon Lakes RD-Ad Site 300 W. Hemlock Fort Collins, CO 80524 Chet Dieringer 970-712-8503 WCT Work Capacity Test June 5, 2015 8:30 (Fri) Slots Filled on 1st to Reserve Basis $0.00 Arapaho-Roosevelt NF & Pawnee NG (ARP) - South Zone USFS Nederland Work Center 534 Ridge Road Nederland, CO 80466 Dave Buchanan 303-541-2514(w) 303-506-7659(c) WCT Work Capacity Test June 10, 2015 8:30 (Wed) Slots Filled on 1st to Reserve Basis $0.00 Arapaho-Roosevelt NF & Pawnee NG (ARP) West Zone Sulphur RD Middle Park High School 795 North 2nd Street Granby, CO 80446 Todd Camm 970-887-4128 WCT Work Capacity Test June 24, 2015 8:30 (Wed) Slots Filled on 1st to Reserve Basis $0.00 Arapaho-Roosevelt NF & Pawnee NG (ARP) West Zone Sulphur RD Middle Park High School 795 North 2nd Street Granby, CO 80446 Todd Camm 970-887-4128