zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
DEPARTMENT OF GENETICS Scheduling Guidelines Applications can be filled out at . The Department of Genetics will respond with a confirmation. They will also respond accordingly if there is a conflict or issue with your request. Requesting Department will have to provide an UAB account number in order to secure a reservation. This account will only be used if the Department of Genetics incurs cost related to not adhering to the guidelines of use or misuse of equipment. Reservations cannot be made more than 12 months in advance unless authorized by the Department of Genetics. Reservations can be made during normal work days. The conference room is not available during the weekends. Usage of the space should be appropriate for the size of the conference room, minimum 25 people. Cancellations for events scheduled in the Finley Conference Center require 72 hours (3 days) advance notice. Failure to give sufficient notice could result in the loss of scheduling privileges. The Department of Genetics has priority reservations for activities that support their academic, research and clinical missions. There may be rare occasions in which you will be "bumped" from the room. If this happens, you will be notified with as much as possible and help find alternate space. This space can only be used for a UAB affiliated event hosted by a UAB Department. After hour usage will require the presence of a security officer. The hosting department is responsible for coordinating with UAB Police, 205-934-4434. General Guidelines The sponsoring department representative, will badge into the conference center during the time approved. If outside caterers are used, you must be present to unlock the door. Please allot time for catering in your request to use the conference center. The department of Genetics is not responsible for unlocking the room for caterers! Existing seating includes 50 seats with tables and additional 20 seats along the walls without table. Maximum capacity is 99 people. The sponsoring department is responsible for all set-up and take-down. Space must be left in the same configuration as found Nothing should be taped, tacked, stapled, etc. to the walls, doors or windows. Food is allowed; however, the sponsoring party must assign an attendant to monitor its delivery/ set-up/ serving/clean-up. All trash should be picked up, securely bagged, and placed in the large trash can located outside on the patio (use side door only). The can is located right outside the catering room door (room where food is served in Finley, adjacent to the restrooms).
proprietary traders. Between Jan. 1, 2009 through Dec. 31, 2011, Hold Brothers' largest account, Demostrate LLC and an affiliate, Trade Alpha, were day-trading firms wholly owned and funded by Hold Brothers' principals. Demostrate and Trade Alpha engaged traders and trading groups in various foreign countries, primarily China, to trade its capital. FINRA found that Demostrate and Trade Alpha were controlled by, or under common control with, Hold Brothers. Demostrate and Trade Alpha used sponsored access relationships with Hold Brothers to connect to U.S. securities exchanges to manipulate the prices of multiple securities. FINRA uncovered hundreds of instances where the foreign day traders used spoofing and layering activities to induce the trading algorithms of unwitting market participants to provide the traders with favorable execution pricing that would not otherwise have been available to them in the absence of the day traders' illicit spoofing and layering activities. Generally, spoofing is a form of market manipulation which involves placing certain non-bona fide order(s), usually inside the existing National Best Bid or Offer (NBBO), with the intention of triggering another market participant(s) to join or improve the NBBO, followed by canceling the non-bona fide order, and entering an order on the opposite side of the market. Layering involves the placement of multiple, non-bona fide, limit orders on one side of the market at various price levels at or away from the NBBO to create the appearance of a change in the levels of supply and demand, thereby artificially moving the price of the security. An order is then executed on the opposite side of the market at the artificially created price, and the non-bona fide orders are immediately canceled. FINRA also found thousands of instances where Demostrate or Trade Alpha traders engaged in pre-arranged trades and wash sales. Hold Brothers also failed to establish and maintain a supervisory system and written procedures that were reasonably designed to supervise the firm's trading activities. FINRA found that numerous "red flags" indicative of suspicious trading were not detected or investigated. This included broad categories of significant suspicious trading, involving patterns of spoofing, layering, pre-arranged trading, and wash trading. In addition, FINRA found that Hold Brothers' AML policies, procedures, and internal controls were inadequate and failed to detect suspicious
RESOURCES Considering each company’s individual stage of development, FinTechSpace offers 3 residing plans: “Private Offices”, “Fixed Seat”, and “Hot Desk” for application. Regarding to each plans, FinTechSpace offers different incubating resources as following: Table 1 FinTechSpace Residing Resources PLANS ITEMS PROVATE OFFICE FIXED SEAT HOT DESKS Spaces Resources Period Per Batch 18 months 18 months 6 months Space Subsidies 50% OFF for the first 3 months 100% OFF for the first 6 months 100% OFF for the first 3 months Company Address Registration V V - Meeting Room V V ◎ LIVE-Stream Room V V - Live House (100+ people event) △ 1 free section per 6 months △ Charged for using Phone Booth V V V Memdatoring Room V V - Common Space V V V FinTech Entrepreneurship Resources Domestic Talks & Ask Entrepreneurship Talks Regulation Talks Technology Ask V V V Coaching 1-on-1 Mentoring Market Mantoring & Consulting GISA Application Assistance V V ◎ Matchmaking and Pitch In-house Matchmaking Meetings Showcases V V V International International Market Coatching V V - International Exchange Programme V V - Technology Cloud-Platform Resources. V V △ Depends on the agreements with individual partners
Deduced: cathode rays are negatively charged Jean Perrin (1895): Paddle wheel discharge tube cathode rays push wheels rays have mass and velocity must be particles negatively charged named electrons J.J. Thompson (1897): ratio of charge to mass of electron deflect electron beam using E- field yE = estimate q/m of electron if vx known Using B-field to balance E-field (since ) calculate q/m = 1.76 x 1011 C/g R.A.Milikan (1909-11): measured charge of electron 1.charge oil drop by rubbing against nozzle of atomizer 2. experiences upward force qE due to applied E-field 3. balance against gravity
vg: terminal velocity of gravity fall (measure by timing drop) vE: terminal velocity of rise (depends on q: measure series of vE) experiment with many different charges on drop set of values for vE , q all integer multiples of one value qe = 1.6 x 10-19 C mass of the electron since q/me = 1.76 x 1011 C/kg (Thomson) and qe = 1.6 x 10-19 C (Millikan) deduce me = 9.1 x 10-31 C/kg 2.Canal rays and the proton Thomson (~1890): does anode produce +ve rays? +ve rays detected when slit put in cathode measure q/m ratio of +ve rays using Thomson method Results vx much smaller than electron case q/m much smaller than electron case q/m depends on gas in tube
Carl Anderson (1932): discovery of the positron Same, mass, spin of electron: opposite charge Deflection of particle in magnetic field in cloud chamber Predicted by Dirac’s eq: antimatter (anti-protons discovered in 1955) The neutrino and the weak force Spectrum of energy for emitted electrons Most electrons ‘missing’ energy Not accompanied by a photon Energy not conserved? Ang momentum not conserved? e.g. 1H3 → 2He3 + e or no p+ + e- Wolfgang Pauli (1931): particle missing
Wolfgang Pauli (1936): postulates neutrino massless, chargeless particle (detected in 1956) no p+ + e- + Splitting the ‘atom’ 1932: Cockcroft and Walton (Rutherford group, Cambridge) Experiment Linear accelerator: protons accelerated in electric field to 1 MeV Fired at Lithium atoms: alpha particles detected on zinc screens Explanation Li atoms split into 2 helium nuclei First transmutation of elements by artificial means Verification of E = mc2 (Einstein) Verification of quantum tunnelling (Gamow) Nobel Prize (1951)
Neutrons provide only partial shielding Short-range force (10-15 m) FS = FC x short-range factor Strong force mediated by new massive particles: mesons (ii) Mass of particles - from wave mechanics Wave eq for nuclear force Apply Panck’s eq E = hf de Broglie’s eq p= h/λ Solution : particle of mass m = hc/2πro (iii) Mass of particles - from Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle Solution : particle of mass m = hc/2πro Discovery of muons and pions (cosmic rays) (i) 1933-36: Heavy electrons in cloud chambers (Anderson and Neddermayer, Street and Stevenson)
Combination of red, yellow blue = white All hadrons white Force between quarks due to colour – quantum chromodynamics QCD QCD: the strong interaction between quarks Transmitted by particles called gluons Zero mass, spin 1 (bosons) Gluon has colour Free gluons not detected: indirect evidence Note: Force between hadrons different from force between quarks 3 new quarks: charm, truth and beauty a) Glashow and Bjorken: leptons and quarks fundamental many similarities 4 lepton → 4 quarks? Also: electroweak theory: symmetry between quarks and leptons? 1970s: neutral weak currents additional channel of disintegration – new quark with new flavour? 1974: new hadronic resonance at SLAC, Brookhaven New particle – J/ψ : ‘long’lifetime (1976 Nobel prize) J/ψ = meson made of charm (cc) 1976: SLAC and Berkeley: neutral charmed meson D0 (cu) D+ and D- later observed
2. Super-symmetry (1971-73) symmetry between quarks, leptons and force carriers? i.e. symmetry between fermions and bosons ? each fermion had a bosonic partner (squarks and sleptons) each boson had a fermionic partner (photinos, gluions etc) since these particles not observed super-symmetry = broken symmetry SUSY unification of electro-weak and QCD: much better than GUT theoretically - less infinities - less renormalization - more natural -hints of role for gravity – supergravity 3. Super-gravity attempts to unify all four fundamental interactions Theories of Everything (ToE) Kaluza (1921): ‘unified’ GR and electromagnetism Wrote GR in 5 dimensions, em appears naturally Klein (1927): converted Kaluza theory to quantum field theory Einstein; attemoted to generalize
Table: Summary of Regression Analysis where Stock Price movement of Bangas as dependent and other factors as independent variable Declaration Date Record Date Market Capitalization Market Turnover General Election 2009 Not Significant Not Significant Significant Significant Significant 2008 Significant Not Significant Significant Significant ---- 2007 Significant Not Significant Significant Significant ---- Note: for detailed workings, please see the annexure. From the above table we can see that the stock price movement of Bangas and its Dividend and EPS Declaration Date is significantly related for the year 2007 and 2008. But in 2009 the relation was not significant. Next we see that the Stock price movement and the Record Date for the company have no significance at all for all the three years. Next we have taken another independent variable “market capitalization” and here we see that the Market Capitalization and the stock price movement have significance for all the three years. That is, whenever the market capitalization increased, stock price of Bangas also increased and vice versa. The result is same with the “market turnover” as well. The movement of market turnover is related to the movement of the stock price of Bangas. So far we have found that the share price movement of Bangas was not related to the corporate decisions like Declaration Date and Record Date we may conclude that the unusual stock price movement is not due to the company specific news, rather it may be
Section 6 – Details of Applicant(s) Income Please state the amounts you receive and how often you receive payment. All questions must be completed either with an amount or N/A (not applicable) – please do not leave blank. Applicant 1 Applicant 2 Income Amount Frequency of Payment Amount Frequency of Payment Basic Net Pay Bonuses/Overtime (Net Amount) Adoption Pay (Occupational & Statutory) Drawings / Dividend if Self Employed Employees Sick Pay (after deductions) Child Benefit Child Tax Credit Working Tax Credit Existing Adoption Allowances Maternity Allowance / Pay Paternity Allowance / Pay Job Seekers Allowance Income Support Incapacity Benefit Bereavement Benefit Severe Disablement Allowance State Retirement Pension State Pension Credit State Savings Credit Industrial Injuries(e.g. Byssinosis) Works Pension / Superannuation War / War Widows Pension Attendance Allowance Disability Living Allowance – Mobility / Care Component Any Other Source of Benefit or Income (e.g. lodgers, property
15. List all companies "in the same group" as the institution. 16. Has the institution or any company in the same group within the last 10 years failed to satisfy a judgement debt under a court order in Malta or elsewhere within a year of the making of the order? If so, give particulars. 17. Has the institution or any company in the same group made any compromise or arrangement with its creditors within the last 10 years or otherwise failed to satisfy creditors in full? If so, give particulars. 18. Has any person been appointed in Malta to take charge of the assets or to assume control of the business of the institution or of any company in the same group, or has the substantial equivalent of any such person been appointed in any other jurisdiction, in the last 10 years? If so, give particulars, including whether such person or equivalent is still acting under the appointment. 19. Has a petition been served in Malta for the appointment of a person as in Question 18, or has the substantial equivalent of such a petition been served in any other jurisdiction, in the last 10 years? If so, give particulars. 20. Has a notice of resolution for the voluntary liquidation of the institution or of any company in the same group been given in Malta, or has the substantial equivalent of such a notice been given in any other jurisdiction, in the last 10 years? If so, give particulars. Has a petition been served in for the compulsory liquidation of the institution or any company in the same group, or has the substantial equivalent of such a petition been served in any other jurisdiction, in the last 10 years? If so, give particulars. 22. Are the affairs of the institution or any company in the same group being or have ever previously been investigated by an inspector or other authorised officer appointed to do so under any Maltese or overseas legislation? If so, give particulars.
2 or more foreign persons hold interests in the Australian urban land corporation, those foreign persons hold less than an aggregate substantial interest in that corporation; (k) who is an Australian citizen not ordinarily resident in Australia; (l) that is a corporation in which the government of an overseas country within the meaning of the Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities Act 1967 holds a substantial interest and the acquisition is of an interest in land where the land is to be used exclusively for the purposes of the diplomatic mission of that country or as a diplomatic residence; (m) that is an Australian corporation that is a foreign person only because of direct interests held in it by Australian citizens not ordinarily resident in Australia; (n) that is a trustee of a trust estate, where the trustee is a foreign person only because of direct interests held in the trust estate by Australian citizens not ordinarily resident in Australia; (o) where the acquisition is of units in a unit trust as a consequence of which: (i) the foreign person holds less than a substantial interest in an Australian urban land trust estate: (A) that is a unit trust that accepts funds from the public on the basis of a prospectus approved by the Corporate Affairs Commission of a State or Territory; (B) that has at least 100 unit holders; (C) that is primarily engaged in the development of land; and (D) that has less than 10 per cent of its real estate assets in the form of developed residential real estate that the trust has not developed itself; or (ii) the foreign person holds less than a substantial interest in an Australian urban land trust estate: (A) that is a unit trust that accepts funds from the public on the basis of a prospectus approved by the Corporate Affairs Commission of a State or Territory; (B) that has at least 100 unit holders; and (C) that has less than 10 per cent of its real estate assets in the form of developed residential real estate; or, where 2 or more foreign persons hold interests in the Australian urban land trust estate, those foreign persons
Foreign Investment Review Board This is a nonstatutorily mandated report providing information on the operation of Australia’s foreign investment review arrangements during 200708. It covers the role of the Foreign Investment Review Board (the Board or FIRB) and daytoday administration of these arrangements by the Treasury. Functions of the Board The FIRB is a nonstatutory body established in 1976 to advise the Treasurer on the Government’s foreign investment policy (the policy) and its administration. As such, the Board’s functions are advisory only. Responsibility for making decisions on foreign investment proposals and for the policy rests with the Treasurer. The Treasury’s Foreign Investment and Trade Policy Division (the Division) advises Treasury ministers on foreign investment matters and provides secretariat services to the Board. The role of the Board, including through its secretariat, is to: examine proposed investments in Australia that are subject to the policy and supporting legislation, and to make recommendations to the Treasurer on these proposals; advise the Treasurer and other Treasury portfolio ministers on the operation of the policy and the Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Act 1975 (the FATA), and on proposed investments that are subject to each; foster an awareness and understanding, both in Australia and abroad, of the policy and the FATA; provide guidance to foreign persons and their representatives/agents on the policy and the FATA; and monitor and ensure compliance with the policy and the FATA. Information on the operation of the FATA is provided in Chapter 3 and in Australia’s Foreign Investment Policy provided at Appendix A to this report. A copy of the FATA and the regulations made under it are provided at Appendices D and E respectively. Board membership During 200708, the Board comprised three parttime members and a fulltime Executive Member.
Code of Liberalisation of Capital Movements www.oecd.org Economic Roundup (Treasury series) www.treasury.gov.au General Agreement on Tariffs in Trade (GATT) www.wto.org General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) www.wto.org Guide to the Investment Regimes of the APEC Member Economies (5th Edition) www.apecsec.org.sg International Direct Investment Statistics Yearbook www.oecd.org OECD Code of Liberalisation of Current Invisible Operations www.oecd.org OECD Declaration on International Investment and Multinational Enterprises www.ausncp.gov.au OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises www.ausncp.gov.au Policies and International Integration: Influences on Trade and Foreign Direct Investment (OECD Study) www.oecd.org The Trade and Investment Effects of Preferential Trading Arrangements — Old and New Evidence (Australian Productivity Commission Staff Working Paper) www.pc.gov.au The Treasury Annual Report 200708 www.treasury.gov.au UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements www.unctad.org UNCTAD World Investment Directory www.unctad.org UNCTAD World Investment Report www.unctad.org
Notes applying to Table 2.14 Includes overseas territories. China excludes Special Administrative Regions and Taiwan. Other comprises all other countries excluding Australia. The investment identified as unallocated includes investments in commercial real estate by property trusts which have a range of foreign investors including pension funds, superannuation funds, and equity funds. Comprises proposals where the investment is from more than one country, such as in joint venture arrangements. These figures indicate the total number of proposals in which investors from the particular country have an interest. Those involving investment originating from more than one country count as one proposal for each of the countries concerned.
Australia’s international investment position Introduction One of the Government’s principal policy objectives is to generate and capture benefits for the Australian community through international trade and investment liberalisation. This is pursued through a multifaceted policy involving complementary multilateral, regional and bilateral engagement. The Treasury’s Foreign Investment and Trade Policy Division (the Division) is responsible for ensuring effective representation of Australia’s foreign investment policy (the policy) and negotiating positions on international investment issues. This work includes: multilateral forums, such as the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the World Trade Organization (WTO); regional forums, such as AsiaPacific Economic Cooperation (APEC); and bilateral mechanisms, such as free trade agreements (FTAs) and investment protection and promotion agreements (IPPAs). The Division also supports the Executive Member of the Board in his role as the Australian National Contact Point (the ANCP) for the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises (the OECD Guidelines) and related corporate social responsibility issues. The role of the ANCP is to ensure the effective promotion and implementation of the OECD Guidelines in Australia. Over the past two decades, growth in worldwide flows of foreign direct investment (FDI) has been particularly strong. This growth in FDI largely reflects the worldwide relaxation of trade and investment controls, together with advancements in information technologies, communications and transport, and the emergence of global production chains. The global financial crisis has impacted adversely on global capital flows. According to OECD estimates, member countries’ outflows of FDI fell by 19 per cent while inflows fell by 35 per cent in 2008. These OECD estimates show that FDI inflows into Australia rose by 7 per cent while outflows from Australia rose by 113 per cent in 2008. Australia has traditionally relied on inward FDI to meet the shortfall between domestic saving and the level of domestic investment. Foreign investment supplements local savings, thereby supporting higher rates of economic growth and employment levels which in turn improves the wellbeing of the Australian people. Inward FDI also continues to play a significant role in making Australian industry internationally competitive, and thereby contributing to export growth, facilitating access to new technologies, financing new and often risky innovations, and providing opportunities for global integration and networking.
The data do not necessarily reflect a change in foreign ownership as, in some cases, both the target and the purchaser are foreign persons. The proposed investment of an approved proposal is the amount advised by the applicants or the best estimate based on the available information. It represents an estimate of the expected proposed investment in the 12 months from the approval unless the approval is granted for a longer period (if the proposal is in fact implemented). Where an approved acquisition is a part of an offshore acquisition, the proposed investment figure is calculated based on the share attributable to the approved acquisition. Where amounts are in a foreign currency, this is converted to Australian dollars based on the exchange rate at the time of the decision. There are some approved proposals for which proposed investment is treated as nil. Examples of this include corporate reorganisations, financing arrangements and where foreign government investor lenders take security interests, but do not have approval to retain ownership after any enforcement of such security interests. The statistics may include some transactions that do not actually proceed. They include: Proposals that are approved in a given year but which are not actually implemented in that year or at all; Approvals for multiple potential acquirers of the same target (including for potential consortium participants that are yet to determine their final maximum percentage interest); and Approvals for shares or units where only a portion of the intended shares or units may be acquired. Acquisitions of diversified company groups are classified into a single industry sector according to the major activity of the group, such as in a diversified mining company with interests in various minerals. Acquisitions of real estate to be used for purposes incidental to the main business activity of the purchaser are classified according to that activity.
For State Fire Marshal Use Only Fire Marshal 2401 NW 23rd, (405) 522-5006 Fax: (405) 522-5028 Fire Extinguisher Industry Retesting Application Form Retest License # Date Issued PO # Retesting Application Fee $50.00 Total Amount Owed: Date Paid Amount Paid Please type or print in ink. Submit one form for each test failed Date of Last Exam: Test that was Failed: Employing Company: Last Name: First Name: Middle Initial: Social Security #: Address: City: State: Zip: Home Phone #: Cell Number: Applicant’s Signature: Date: Return To: . Oklahoma State Fire Marshal 2401 NW 23rd, Suite 4 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73107
Within 2 km of interface BEC Zone – CWH dm ss1 Somewhat rich site Concern that the climate envelope of this part of the CWH may become more warm and dry The Standard BCG Zone Suitable Species Proposed Stocking Standard Species Silviculture System Target (sph) Min P (sph) Min PA (sph) Max Density (sph)2 Max Basal Area (m2) Regen Delay (yrs) Min Ht (m) MITD (m) Comp Ratio (%) Primary Secondary Tertiary Broadleaf Fire Management Appropriate1 Preferred (P) Acceptable (A) CWH - Current FDP Standard Fd Hw Pw, Cw Act, Dr, Ep, Mb, Ra Py, Lw Fd, Hw, Cw Clear Cut 900 400 500 3 Fd/Hw – 3.0 Pw – 2.5 others – 1.5 2 150 CWH - Fire Management Standard Fd, Pw Cw, Py, Lw, Hw Clear Cut 900 600 700 1000 2 Fw/Hw – 3.0 Pw – 2.5 Cw/Lw – 1.5 Py – 0.6 2 100 1 – Fire management appropriate suitable species are additional species ecologically adapted to the site that do not generally maximize timber production which may be used as part of the fire management stocking standard. 2 - Represents the total density of conifers greater than 50 % of the specified minimum tree height for the primary species with the highest minimum tree height. The Rationale Fd , Pw are both fire resistant and Pw reduces canopy bulk density Fd, Pw are complementary – similar growth potential suited to drier conditions Use high genetic gain stock to reduce rust, suppress ingrowth and bracken fern Relax competition ratio to allow some broadleaf species if they occur which would reduce fire behaviour Reduce regen delay for fast site occupancy reducing competition and hazard Density and MITD should be high and low enough respectively for ingrowth/understory suppression and crown base height lift to free growing at age 20 May still be a period of 2 or 3 years of hazard as trees establish and grow – crown closure by age 6 at the earliest This density (900/ha) at free growing may be carried through to harvest Plant 1200 to account for mortality Maximum density to be 1000/ha where trees that contribute to maximum are either dominant or codominant
Fire Pump Permit Application Section A – Site Information Complete for All Permits Name of Building/Site: DPW – ISD Parent Building Permit Number: Physical Location (911 Address): Name of Lessee (If Business) Building Owner Name: Owner Mailing Address: Owner Contact (Phone and Section B – Fire Pump Project Information The fire pump will support - check all that are applicable: Class I or III Standpipe System Fire Sprinkler System Shared between buildings in a complex Fire Hydrant System Specialty Suppression System Other: Section C – Fire Pump Information Manufacturer: Model: GPM @ PSI Type: Diesel Electric This application must be accompanied by the following: Electric fire pumps must be accompanied with a letter from BED indicating service reliability as per NFPA 20. Manufacturer’s specifications and information for each type of system component being installed. Fire alarm system connections shall require a separate City permit issued to a qualified fire alarm technician. NOTE: All submittal documents are required prior to review and permitting. *FOR OFFICE USE ONLY – DO NOT WRITE IN GREY * Firehouse # Permit # Received Date: Reviewer: Check # Check From: Amount: DPW Permit #: BFD FMO Approval Date:
Families In Religious Education F.I.R.E. • Registration Form • 2018-19 Family: Last Name ___________________________ Family Email __________________________________ Phone #1/ Name: ______________________________ Phone #2/ Name: ______________________________ Below: Please list household members (first names) who will be involved in FIRE. Add last name if different from above. *Note for families with children: At least one parent must be included in registration Name Grade Adult Name Grade Adult VOLUNTEER DISCOUNT See reverse. $__________ THANK YOU!! TUITION Participants Cost Amounts Adults $20.00 each _________ Youth (K-12) $45.00 each _________ Confirmation or 1st Communion $40.00 each _________ Sacramental Preparation (in addition to FIRE) Childcare is provided for children age 0-5 at no additional cost The maximum tuition fee per family is $150.00 total Pay it forward: To assist families in need, we have included a gift of __________ Methods of payment: we accept cash, check (please make checks out to Christ Our Light) or card (online only: www.christourlightmn.org click on “giving” link. Processing fee applies.) ______ Check here if you are NOT a registered member and need to attend a Member Orientation Session. (Non-Registered participants are asked to pay a fee of $150.00 that will be returned upon attending a Member Orientation Session. (Please make out a SEPARATE check for this.)
VOLUNTEER OPPORTUNITIES The following volunteers do not pay tuition fees for their family: (Sacrament fees not included in discount) ❒ Catechist (teacher) for FIRE grade level sessions. Grade level preference: __________ ❒ HS/MS FIRE small group leader. Grade level preference: _________ The following volunteers get a $30.00 discount up to a maximum of $60.00/family: ❒ Assistant in a FIRE classroom, grade level preference: _______ ❒ Spark Teaching Assistant (grades 3-5) ❒ Meal-Helper ❒ Catechist for Children’s Liturgy of the Word ❒ Childcare Assistant ❒ Greeter No family (or individual) will be refused participation in the FIRE program due to financial hardship. Please contact Fr. Kevin Anderson, Matt Kehrer, or Wendy Rappé, if assistance would be helpful. Important information Please indicate below if you or a member of your family has special needs. Please include any allergies. Also know that while we try our best, snacks with peanuts might be served. Christ Our Light’s Faith Formation programming is community-based and interactive so being present is essential. If this schedule does not work for you or your family, please contact the Faith Formation Director to make other arrangements. Christ Our Light Catholic Parish
BLM BIA DNR Federal NPS USFW USFS WA Fire Service Other Government: BLM BIA DNR Forest Land Non-Industry Federal Forest LO – Industry NPS Private US Dept Fish & Wildlife USFS Other Government: BLM BIA DNR Federal NPS US Fish & Wildlife USFS WA Fire Service Other Government: Damages Type Unit # Threatened # Damaged Inside Perimeter # Destroyed Inside Perimeter # Survived Inside Perimeter Inside Outside Total Perimeter Business Each Communication Site Each Historic Building Each Homes Each Merchantible Timber MBF Out Buildings Each Timber Products Each Section 2 – To Be Filled Out by Incident Management Team Effective Line (in chains) Dozer: Hand: Total acres burned: FMAG Fire? YES NO MOB Fire? YES NO Date & Time Fire Controlled: Date & Time Fire Called Out: Specific Fuel: (check all that apply): Timber Type: (check all that apply): Brush Cheat Grass Driftwood Duff Ferns Leaves Litter Miscellaneous Other Grass Pine Needles Pole Size or Larger Tree Crowns Reproduction Sage Brush Slash Clearcut-Heavy Slash Clearcut-Light Slash Selective-Heavy Slash Selective-Light Snags Snowbreak Stumps Tree Moss Weed Mixture Windfalls Woodchips Alaska Yellow Cedar Big Leaf Maple Black Cottonwood Cascara Clearcut Douglas fir Elderberry Engelmann Spruce Grand Fir Hawthorne Lodgepole Pine Madrone Mixed Non-Comm Hardwood Mt Hemlock Noble Fir Oregon Ash Oregon White Oak Pacific Silver Fir Pacific Yew Paper Birch Ponderosa Pine Port Orford Cedar Rocky Mtn Juniper Scotch Pine Sequoia Shore Pine Sitka Spruce Subalpine Fir Trembling Aspen True Fir Vine Maple Western Hemlock Western Larch Western Red Cedar Western White Pine White Alder Whitebark Pine Wild Cherry Willow Burn Area Ownership Burn Area Jurisdiction # of Acres Agency # of Acres Agency # of Acres Agency # of Acres Agency BLM NPS BLM Other Government BIA Other Government BIA US Fish & Wildlife DNR Private DNR USFS Federal US Fish & Wildlife Federal Washington Fire Service Indust. Forest Landowner USFS NPS Other Government Narrative
For F2 samples, the trend of Ca, P, Si content of the SBF as a function of time was similar, but with some differences in the μg ml-1 levels and in the dissolution rate. The amount of Ca species released was higher, reaching 320 μg ml-1 after 2 weeks (see Fig.4a). The release rate for Si species was slower in comparison to the previous material and the rate was almost linear from 72 h to 3 weeks, finally reaching 75 μg ml-1 (Fig.4b). The precipitation rate of P species was also slower, however P was mostly removed by 2 weeks (Fig.4c). The pH trend was similar to that for F1 samples. The highest value of 8 was reached after 2 weeks, after which the pH decreased to 7.95 between 2 weeks and 3 weeks. The initial rapid dissolution did not appear detrimental, since the pH fluctuation was within the buffering capability of culture medium. Fig. 4: Dissolution profiles for a) Ca, b) Si, c) P and d) pH trend as a function of time, for foams subjected to the complete synthesis cycle, after soaking in SBF for 21 days. Results are presented as mean ± SD, n=3 per each time point. Fig.5 compares FTIR (Fig.5a) spectra and XRD (Fig.5b) patterns of the samples before and after 3 week immersion in SBF. For unreacted samples of both formulations, the FTIR spectra contained vibration bands at 510, 900 and 1010 cm-1 which can be reasonably associated with wollastonite (CaSiO3). The same peaks were not detected in the FTIR spectra for the samples after soaking in SBF, meaning that wollastonite was progressively subjected to decomposition in SBF, in agreement with the calcium release (Fig.4). This is also confirmed by the XRD patterns for the samples after soaking in SBF (Fig.5b), which showed no evidence of wollastonite, but peaks attributable to SiO2, Ca2SiO4 (only for F2 samples) and to apatite phases were found, the latter partially constituted by apatite incorporating –OH groups (labelled as HAp) and mainly by HCA.
- Pre-calculated Sprinkler system 11.45am Pump sizing case studies - Selecting the correct pump size of Jockey, Duty & Standby - In-house problem, case study (if available) Property Loss Control Guidelines & Maintenance of Fire Protection Systems 12.30pm Lunch Lunch 1.30pm Principles of Fire combustion, fire triangle and tetrahedron - solid fuel - liquid fuel - gas fuel Heat Sources - explosion proof equipment classification Overview of Explosion Hazard due to dust in the atmosphere Gaseous Suppression System for Data Centre, Computer Room, Electrical & Transformer Rooms - MS 1590, CO2 Extinguishing systems, Design and Installation - MS 1476, Gaseous Fire Extinguishing systems , Halocarbon agents and Inert agents - The differences between Inert Gas, Carbon Dioxide and Halocarbon (FM200,FE-13, NAF227) 2.45pm Smoke Control System Guidelines - Smoke extraction - Smoke spill - Smoke venting Setting up of an in-house Fire Fighting Team - duties of respective team member - training schedule to familiar with the installed FPS 3.30pm Tea Break Tea Break 3.45pm By Products of Combustion and Detectors, theory and installations to pick the signal - Smoke - Heat - Flame (UV/Infrared) - Fire Gases - Pressure expanding smoke Setting up of an in-house Emergency Evacuation Team - duties of Chief Warden, Area Warden - conduct 6 monthly rehearsal on the evacuation procedure 5.00pm End of session End of session Faclilitator Profile Ir Gary Lim is an experienced and qualified Professional Engineer with over 20 years of manufacturing experience in the areas of industrial engineering, project management, maintenance, production and factory management. He is the Advisor of the Building Services Technical Division and a member of organisations such as Fire Advisory Board of the Institution of Engineers, Malaysia, Malaysia Fire Protection Association and Minority Shareholder Watchdog Group. He is an active member of SIRIM Work Group in drawing up Malaysian Standards on Plastic Pipes. He obtained his degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Canterbury, New Zealand. He is a Professional Engineer registered with the Board of Engineers, Malaysia and a Fellow of the Institution of Engineers, Malaysia (IEM). He has conducted many public seminars for Malaysia Fire Protection Association, Institution of Engineers, Malaysia and the insurance industry. His areas of specialisation include Plumbing Engineer ing, Fire Engineer ing, Risk Management, Business Continuity Management and Property Underwriting. ADMINISTRATIVE DETAILS
MONITORING COMPLIANCE WITH PROCEDURAL DOCUMENTS Minimum requirement to be monitored Lead Tool Frequency of Report of Compliance Reporting arrangements Lead(s) for acting on Recommendations Regular monitoring of issues arising and engagement of responsible persons Fire Safety Manager Fire issues meeting Annual Policy audit report to: Fire and Security Working Group Fire Safety Manager Ensure roles required under this policy are filled and active Fire Safety Manager Fire and Security Working Group Annual Policy audit report to: Fire and Security Working Group Fire Safety Manager Regular monitoring of issues arising and engagement of responsible persons Fire Safety Manager Fire issues meeting Annual Policy audit report to: Fire and Security Working Group Fire Safety Manager This document will be monitored to ensure it is effective and to assure compliance. .
Stage 2 – Full Impact Assessment What is the impact Level of Impact Mitigating Actions (what needs to be done to minimise / remove the impact) Responsible Officer Monitoring of Actions The monitoring of actions to mitigate any impact will be undertaken at the appropriate level Specialty Procedural Document: Specialty Governance Committee Clinical Service Centre Procedural Document: Clinical Service Centre Governance Committee Corporate Procedural Document: Relevant Corporate Committee All actions will be further monitored as part of reporting schedule to the Equality and Diversity Committee
FIRE PROCEEDURE On finding a fire – RAISE THE ALARM On hearing the fire alarm – EVERYBODY WITHOUT A DESIGNATED ROLE – LEAVE THE BUILDING Designated Person 1 – COLLECT THE EMERGENCY PACK and go to the evacuation point 1. Take the roll call 2. Wait for Person 2 to meet you and tell them if anyone is missing. Do not re - enter the building to look for them. 3. Keep everyone safe until Person 2 says it is safe to return 4 Fill in the FIRE EVACUATION RECORD. 5 If anything other than a false alarm – INFORM THE ON CALL MANAGER Designated Person 2 – GO TO THE FIRE PANEL WITH A PHONE 1. Identify the source of the alarm and go to that area if appropriate with a fire extinguisher. 2 Put out the fire if small 3 If you cannot easily put out the fire CALL 999 and assist with information when they arrive. 999 4 Go to the evacuation point and check the roll call 5 If it is a false alarm – reset the panel and THEN tell everyone they can return to the building.
FSC102: Fire Operations (11 credits) Monday (Skills 9:30am-3:00pm) Wednesday (Classroom 9:30am-1:00pm) Friday (Classroom 9:30am-1:00pm) *Skills scheduled day is subject to change according to Mesa’s training facilities schedule. FSC134: Fitness for Firefighters (3 Credits) Monday (8:00am-9:20am) Wednesday (8:00am-9:20am) Friday (8:00am-9:20am) *Skills scheduled day is subject to change according to Mesa’s training facilities schedule. MCC Applications are to be submitted to: Fire Science/EMT Department 145 N. Centennial Way, 4th Floor Mesa, AZ 85201 Attn: Deana Bright (480-461-6300) Submit (complete or incomplete) applications before July 23rd Late packets will be accepted and reviewed before you can register if openings are available http://www.mesacc.edu/departments/fire-science-emt Applications can be submitted while you are in progress. After prerequisites are complete, it is the students’ responsibility to come into the office to get registered by availability of the classes. Registration is on a first come – first serve basis by complete packets. Attending the Information Meeting on the date listed below is required. At the meeting you will receive information for the Fire Academy, Turnout Rental, and Uniforms. Mandatory Information Meeting Saturday, July 28th 2018 (9:00am - 11:00am) Meeting will be held at the Mesa Public Safety Training Facility 3260 N 40th St, Mesa AZ 85215 (More information will be sent to applicants prior to the meeting)
DOLLAR AMOUNT: $ PUBLICLY BID? YES NO DATE COMPLETED: TYPE OF WORK?: CONTACT PERSON: TELEPHONE #: ) CONTACT PERSON'S RELATION TO PROJECT?: (i.e., contract manager, purchasing agent, etc.) PROJECT NAME: OWNER: CITY/STATE: DOLLAR AMOUNT: $ PUBLICLY BID? TYPE OF WORK?: YES DATE COMPLETED: NO CONTACT PERSON: CONTACT PERSON'S RELATION TO PROJECT?: TELEPHONE #: ( ) (i.e., contract manager, purchasing agent, etc.) PROJECT NAME: OWNER: CITY/STATE: DOLLAR AMOUNT: $ PUBLICLY BID? TYPE OF WORK?: YES DATE COMPLETED: NO CONTACT PERSON:_ CONTACT PERSON'S RELATION TO PROJECT?:_ TELEPHONE #: ( ) (i.e., contract manager, purchasing agent, etc.) PROJECT NAME: OWNER: CITY/STATE: DOLLAR AMOUNT: $ PUBLICLY BID? TYPE OF WORK?: YES DATE COMPLETED: _ NO CONTACT PERSON: CONTACT PERSON'S RELATION TO PROJECT?: TELEPHONE #:( ) (i.e., contract manager, purchasing agent, etc.) 10. The undersigned certifies that the information contained herein is complete and accurate and hereby authorizes and requests any person, firm, or corporation to furnish any information requested by the City in verification of the recitals comprising this statement of Bidder's qualifications and experience. DATE: BIDDER: SIGNATURE: PRINTED NAME: TITLE:
“Company Name”. Date: Time Evacuation Order Given: _________AM _________PM Time Headcount Completed: _________AM _______PM Total Elapsed Time: _____________Minutes What went well and according to plan? What needs to be improved or changed, or what did not go according to plan? Name of Evaluator Signature of Evaluator ________________________________ _______________________________________ Original Flied with Written Emergency Action Plan I Copy to the Safety Committee for Review
Administrative Scott Gamby, Fire Chief/FOIII/EMT-B Andy Slagh, Administrative/Safety Lieutenant/CO/EMT-B Anne Snider, Office Manager Bob Carlton, Chaplain Station #1 – Virginia Park Station Patrick Gamby, Captain/CO/MFR Andy Stokes, Lieutenant/CO/ EMT-B Bill Nelson, FF/MFR Larry Woodall, FF/EMT-Basic Jason Lovell, FF/EMT-Basic Dan Martinez, FF/EMT-Basic Sean Reilly, FF/MFR Ryan Givens, FF/EMT-Paramedic Jon DeMaat, FF/MFR Aaron Van Huis, FF Mark Klomparens, FF/EMT-Basic Matt Tanis, FF/EMT-Basic Ryan Bloomquist, FF/CO/ EMT-Basic Sienna Echols, Station #2 – Central Station Scott Heerema, Captain/CO/MFR Bill Smalldon, Lieutenant/CO/MFR Dave Bekken, FF Bob Cooke, FF/MFR Todd Garvelink, FF/MFR Cole Middlecamp, FF/MFR Ron Greendyke, FF/EMT-Basic Tom Baumann, FF/MFR Dave Apkarian, FF/MFR Scott Verspoor, FF/MFR Curtis Redder, FF/MFR Andrew Van Til, FF/EMT-Basic Tim Vogelzang, FF/EMT-Basic Paul Sam, FF Jon Clausing, FF/MFR Ken Lothschutz, FF/MFR Drew Schrotenboer, FF/EMT-Paramedic Dave Garcia, FF/MFR Ryan VanPutten, FF/EMT-Basic Mike DeWaard, FF Ian Wallaker, Colin Staat, FF Description of Certifications: CO: Company Officer FF: Firefighter MFR: Medical First Responder EMT-Basic: Emergency Medical Technician-Basic EMT-Paramedic: Emergency Medical Technician-Paramedic 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Personnel Accomplishments and Special Certifications
Departmental Projects Accomplished During 2016 Infant and Adult CPR manikins Lifepak 1000 AED Trainer The Lifepak 1000 trainer provides realistic training in a device that utilizes the same screen messages, audible tones and voice prompts as those found in the Lifepak 1000 defibrillator, but without live energy. It helps guide users-in-training through simulated analysis, energy delivery and prompted CPR intervals. Each year our firefighters are required to take a CPR / AED refresher class. This year we purchased our own manikins and AED trainer so we can conduct our certifications in house. It also now opens the opportunity so we can offer classes to the public and schools, Wascomat W730co Gear Washer
increase knowledge about the legal and practical issues relating to fire doors, FDIS has recently introduced a for fire door installers, joiners and building maintenance teams. The was established to raise the standard of fire doors across the supply chain and has expanded to include not just the market leaders in fire door manufacturing, but also in converting fire doors, ironmongery, intumescent seals and glazing systems, and, more recently, merchants and installers. It is a partnership, combining the membership, lobbying and promotion skills of the BWF with the technical and certification skills of Exova Warringtonfire. ENDS
PART C – SUBMISSION TO FIRE DEPARTMENT Parts A, B & C prepared by: Submitted to Chief Fire Official on: PART D – CHIEF FIRE OFFICIAL APPROVAL Fire Drill Scenario Approved By: on Date Print Name Proposed Fire Drill Dates Approved By: on Date Print Name Fire Drill Scenario Page 8
2018 Cochise County FSE…Active Shooter Response Fire/EMS Evaluation Guide Fire/EMS Evaluator Comments Was the initial response package correct based on the nature code? □ Yes □ No Did the initial units stage at a level 1 location appropriately? □ Yes □ No Did the first on scene fire officer request information through dispatch on where the location of the LE ICP is? □ Yes □ No Did the first arriving fire officer and or BC tie in with the LEO IC? Was Unified Command established? (Fire/EMS, LE, School) □ Yes □ No □ Yes □ No Did Fire/EMS obtain entry routes and information concerning climate zones from LE? □ Yes □ No Was RTF established ASAP with LE Force Protection? □ Yes □ No Did the UC request resources appropriately? □ Yes □ No Was a level 2 staging location established □ Yes □ No
Was the transport group reinforced with enough resources? Was air transport effectively managed and utilized with safety in mind? □ Yes □ No □ Yes □ No Were all immediate patients transported in a timely manner? Were the remaining patients transported appropriately and did they receive the needed medical care? Did the IC advocate for victim and responder welfare? (Red Cross, counselors, PSG) Notes □ Yes □ No □ Yes □ No □ Yes □ No