COORDINATION AA7. Institutional roles and responsibilities and lead agencies: Please list ministries / national institutions with responsibilities in the following areas: a. governing and regulating; b. providing service (including planning, financing, and operating); c. monitoring and surveillance. Indicate the level of responsibility of the institution in each area on a scale of 1 to 4 (1. None, 2. Contributor, 3. Major contributor, 4. Lead). Please add lines or attach separate page if necessary. (Please select ONE lead institution for each column.) Ministry or national institution Level of responsibility in each sector: 1. None, 2. Contributor, 3. Major contributor, 4. Lead Drinking-water Hygiene promotion Basic sanitation Municipal wastewater Faecal sludge collection and treatment Govern/ Regulate Provide Service Monitor/ Surveillance Govern/ Regulate Provide Service Monitor/ Surveillance Govern/ Regulate Provide Service Monitor/ Surveillance Govern/ Regulate Provide Service Monitor/ Surveillance Govern/ Regulate Provide Service Monitor/ Surveillance e.g. Ministry of Health 3 1 4 4 4 4 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 Non-governmental stakeholders (including private sector)
A8*. Coordination between actors: Does a formal mechanism exist to coordinate the work of different ministries, institutions, and organizations with responsibilities for WASH (health, education, environment, agriculture, public works, etc.)? (Please check one response) Yes, a formal mechanism exists Yes, an informal mechanism exists A mechanism is in development No ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ If a mechanism exists or is in development, does the coordination process: (Please check one response per row) Yes Partly No a. Include all ministries and governmental agencies that directly or indirectly influence service delivery? a. ☐ ☐ ☐ b. Include non-governmental stakeholders (e.g. advocacy groups, civil society organizations, NGOs)? b. ☐ ☐ ☐ c. Include donors that contribute to WASH activities nationally? c. ☐ ☐ ☐ d. Include mutual review and assessment as part of the mechanism? d. ☐ ☐ ☐ e. Apply evidence-based decision-making, including consideration of agreed indicators (e.g. access, WASH related diseases, WASH finance)? e. ☐ ☐ ☐ f. Base its work on agreed sectoral framework or national plan? f. ☐ ☐ ☐ g. Is the coordination process documented? g. ☐ ☐ ☐ h. Is there a budget line allocated for coordinated activities? h. ☐ ☐ ☐ i. How often does this body meet or formally interact? j. If the coordination mechanism is formal, please name the mechanism and provide a link or copy of documentation on the formal mechanism in place. k. If the coordination mechanism is informal, please provide a description. A9*. Coordinating with development partners: To what extent do development partners (donors, NGOs, international organizations, etc.) coordinate with government institutions? Total number of development partners implementing WASH projects Number of development partners participating in central government-led sector coordination framework (ref to A10) Number of development partners actively coordinating work with local authorities in support of government policies, processes and defined priorities Number of development partners reporting results of monitoring back to government institutions