manager to assess and evaluate processes and adherence to procedures. Corrective actions needed are discussed at the time of inspection and verification. Implementation of corrective actions occurs at the next accompanied inspection. This is documented in the investigators personnel file. Table C1.2.1 Documentation of Assessments Type of Assessment Number and/or Frequency Assessment Personnel Schedule Reporting and Resolution Laboratory Audits Six contract labs, agency lab and unknown number of commercial labs applying for accreditation FOSD Accreditation Group Staff Once before accreditation is issued and once every 2 years thereafter, unless interim accreditation is issued Technical Report of audit produced and letter sent to laboratory notifying of findings. Follow-up conducted to confirm resolution of issues. Peer Review of specified technical issue As needed Specified by Manager No Set Schedule Final document reported on Technical Peer Review Document Quality Assurance Review 100% of RCRA inspection reports FOD Region Office Waste Section Manager Within 45 days of the inspection date Maintained by FOD Region Office Program Manger Quality Control Review 100% of Enforcement Action Request submitted (EAR) Enforcement ED staff and management Within 15 days of receipt of report from FOD Section 7i of the EAR Program Audit Completeness Review One Class 1, or Class 1ED and one Class 2 modification WPD QA Specialist Annual review Report sent to RCRA Project Manager, Section Manager and Division Director Program Audit Completeness Review One major permit amendments or new permit reviewed for completeness as needed WPD QA Specialist Annual review Report sent to RCRA Project Manager, Section Manager and Division Director Program Audit Completeness Review 5% of all nonhazardous waste determinations Technical Analysis Team in WPD Annual review Report maintained by TAT and available upon request Program Audit 5% of hazardous waste non-electronic submittals IHW QA Specialist or Team Leader in PRSD Annual review Report maintained in PRSD and available upon request Program Audit Completeness Review 1 Class 3 Permit modification as needed or approved by WPD DD WPD QA Specialist Annual review Report sent to RCRA Project Manager, Section Manager and Division Director Program Audit Completeness Review 1 Trial Burn/Risk Burn reviewed as needed as needed or approved by WPD WPD QA Specialist Annual review Report sent to RCRA Project Manager, Section Managers and Division Director
Organic Analytes Field/Laboratory sample ID Confirmation of results when positive results are detected from location not previously tested by laboratory Method reference number(s) (extraction/analysis where applicable) Detection & quantitation limits defined Chain of custody Date of analysis Sample receipt and login information System monitoring compound Positive controls Matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate Laboratory control sample Surrogates Negative controls Method Blanks GC/MS tuning - proof of acceptance Internal standard area and retention time summary Sample preparation details Pre/post sample amounts Extractions Sample cleanups Dilutions Sample prep/extraction log Sample data Case Narrative Quantitation reports Chromatographs * Spectra * Instrument run log * Initial calibration acceptance criteria met* Continuing calibration acceptance criteria met* Manual integrations with pre and post integration chromatograms* Audit trail report * Accreditation certification if not meeting exception defined in 30 TAC §25.6 Inorganic Analytes Field/Laboratory sample ID Method reference number(s) (digestion/analysis where applicable) Detection & quantitation limits defined Chain of custody Date of analysis Sample receipt and login information Positive controls Matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate Laboratory control sample (LCS) Negative controls Method Blanks Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) interference check sample criteria met* Post digestion spike sample information Method of standard addition (MSA) if applicable Sample preparation details Pre/post sample amounts Digestions Dilutions Sample prep log* Sample data Case Narrative Raw sample data, instrument output* Instrument run log* Initial calibration acceptance criteria* Continuing calibration acceptance criteria* Accreditation certification if not meeting exception as defined in 30 TAC§25.6
8. Identification of all groundwater detection monitoring system wells and associated aquifers required to be sampled by the permit. Permit Table VI.B.3.b and Permit Provision VI.D.2.c Yes No NA 9. All wells identified in checklist Item 8 sampled, or explanation of discrepancy provided. Permit Table VI.B.3.b and Permit Provision VI.D.2.c Yes No NA 10. Statement whether a SSI has occurred over background values in any well during the previous calendar year’s monitoring events. Permit Provision VI.G.1 Yes No NA 11. Discussion of the status of any SSI events. Permit Provision VI.G.1 Yes No NA 12. Discussion of groundwater sampling methods. Permit Provision VI.D.1.c Yes No NA 13. Groundwater level measurements relative to Mean Sea Level (MSL) measured to within 0.01 ft. Permit Provision VI.D.2.d(1) Yes No NA 14. Determination of pH, temperature, Specific Conductivity and, if applicable, Turbidity in nephelometric turbidity units. Permit Provision VI.D.2.d(2) Yes No NA 15. Description of groundwater sample appearance (clarity, color, etc.). Permit Provision VI.D.2.d(3) Yes No NA
16. Comparison of measured total well depth to total constructed well depth and screened interval as noted on well construction logs. Recommendations for any needed corrective action (redevelopment or replacement). Permit Provision VI.D.2.d(4) Yes No NA 17. Discussion of findings from inspection of all wells specified in permit, and discussion of any needed repairs or replacements. Permit Provision VI.D.2.d(5) Yes No NA 18. Table summarizing groundwater elevation data for each well including field measurements, surveyed elevations of measuring point and calculated groundwater elevation above MSL. Permit Provision VI.G.2 and VI.D.2.d(1) Yes No NA 19. Discussion of groundwater flow direction and flow rate in the uppermost aquifer or any other aquifer that is sampled, using the data collected during the preceding calendar year’s sampling events. Include all calculations and data inputs used for the determination. Permit Provision VI.G.3 Yes No NA
20. Contour map sealed by a Professional Geoscientist of the potentiometric water levels in the uppermost aquifer or any other aquifer that is sampled based at a minimum upon concurrent measurements in all monitoring wells for each monitoring event. Permit Provision VI.G.4 and 22 TAC 851.156 Yes No NA 21. Any exclusion of data collected for generating contour map and justifications. Recommended Yes No NA 22. Table summarizing analytical results for all required samples and constituents. Permit Provision VI.G.2 Yes No NA 23. Field investigation reports including, at a minimum, sample results, sample collection records, chain-of-custody records, analytical results, associated quality control including trip, field and rinsate blanks as applicable, laboratory blanks, spike recovery, duplicate, and surrogate recovery data and a written discussion of the sampling event. QAPP Section A.9.2.1 Yes No NA