zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Assessing your application The panel will meet to assess applications during the week of 17th July 2017. It is anticipated that a decision will be made on the 21st July 2017. When assessing an application, the panel will consider such matters as: The management of the applicant organisation Whether the proposed activity fits the criteria Whether the activity fits well with exiting services/activities and is not duplicating existing services/activities Whether the applicant demonstrates an understanding of the project and how it can be delivered Whether the activity is value for money, and appropriately costed Whether the outputs and outcomes are realistic and achievable The financial position and sustainability of the applicant organisation The organisation has appropriate safeguarding procedures in place You will receive an email informing you of the decision. If your organisation is offered the funding you will be provided with a set of conditions and an acceptance form. If you are willing to accept the conditions, the acceptance form will need to be signed and returned, together with a copy of a recent bank statement, before the funding can be paid. How will the funding be paid The funding will be paid directly via BACS into the recipient’s bank account. Spending the funding and reporting back (monitoring) Once an offer has been made the recipient must return the acceptance form and start spending the funding within three months of the date of the offer letter. If you have been unable to start spending the funding within three months of receiving the offer letter, or it cannot be used for the purpose for which it was awarded, you must inform us of the situation as soon as possible. The funding is for a period of up to two years from the date of the signed offer letter. In signing the acceptance form the recipient agrees to use the funding only for the purposes described in the offer letter. If there is a change in your organisation’s circumstances that affects the way the funding can be spent, you must contact to discuss this. We will try to be as helpful as possible. Monitoring reports will be required from recipients to confirm that the funding they received has been used appropriately and to assess the impact of the activity on the identified need. We will work with the successful organisation to agree the timescale for monitoring reports. These are likely to be quarterly. Funding recipients must keep receipts and financial records of the way in which the funding is spent, as these may be needed in the future for audit purposes. Page 4 of 4
Practice management reference group: Application form Your Name Your Title Practice/Facility Name Contact Details Ph: Email: Type of organisation: General Practice Allied Health/ Other Number of staff in your practice General Practitioners Nurses Administrative What is your motivation for applying for a position on the Practice Management Reference Group?
Press Release July 7, 2015 Bluebird Care team trek up Ben Nevis and raise £1,500 for Alzheimer’s Society Four members of staff from homecare provider Bluebird Care have raised £1,500 for the Alzheimer’s Society by trekking up the UK’s highest mountain at night. The Burnham-based Bluebird Care team started the Ben Nevis Midnight Challenge at 10.30pm at Fort William in Scotland and climbed through pouring rain. Deputy care manager Katy Cresswell completed the gruelling nine and-a-half-hour challenge, returning to base at 8am, with carers Renay Clark, Aneela Habib and Tunde Lamperth completing part of the climb. Sponsored by employers Ian and Anne Inglis, from the Summers Road office, Katy, age 29 from Woodside Way, Reading, trekked through plummeting temperatures to the snowy summit as part of a group of 150 people from across the UK. Katy Cresswell said: “It was harder than I thought it would be, as we were cold and wet and it was very dark apart from your head torch, but it was definitely worth it. It’s a challenge I have always wanted to do and it was great to do it for such a worthwhile cause.” Ian Inglis, said: “We are extremely proud that the Bluebird Care team took part in this tough challenge and that they raised such an impressive amount through donations from customers, colleagues, friends, family and members of the local community. It is events like this that allow the Alzheimer's Society to continue their important work.” Award-winning Bluebird Care, provides a variety of care in people’s own homes across the Slough, South Buckinghamshire and South Wycombe areas, from short visits to live-in support. Anyone wanting to make a donation can go to or call the Bluebird Care office on 01628 605797. ends Media enquiries: to arrange interviews with Katy Cresswell, please contact Cathy Kelly at or on 07704 130226. Notes to editors:
Name ________________________ Date_____________ Class______ Find the Discount, Sale Price, Tax & Final Price Jeans; regular price $88; discount rate 35%; sales tax 4% Discount ________ Sale Price __________ Tax _________ Final Price _________ Sneakers; regular price $76; discount rate 20%; sales tax 3% Discount ________ Sale Price __________ Tax _________ Final Price _________ Skateboard; regular price $205; discount rate 55%; sales tax 4.5% Discount ________ Sale Price __________ Tax _________ Final Price _________
11:15 – 11:45 Refreshments 11:45 – 12:00 The College of Optometrists’ Prevalence of Visual Impairment in Dementia (PrOVIDe) study Dr Michael Bowen, The College of Optometrists 12:00 – 12:15 Dementia and low vision Jennifer Brower, Association of British Dispensing Opticians 12:15 – 12:25 Q&A 12:25 – 12:40 Feedback on the professional focus groups conducted with Occupational Therapists and Social Care Workers about awareness of dementia-related visual impairment Dr Anne McIntyre, Brunel University London 12:40 – 12:55 Sight loss and Dementia Friendly Principles of practice – how we are preparing the workforce to recognise and meet the needs of people living with sight loss and dementia June Neil, RNIB 12:55 – 13:05 Q&A 13:05 – 13:10 Short film ‘Do I see what you see?’ Experiences of people with Posterior Cortical Atrophy (PCA) Simon Ball, UCL 13:10 – 13:15 Wellcome Collection exhibitions tbc 13:15 – 14:15 Lunch, networking and opportunity to visit Wellcome Collection exhibitions 14:15 – 14:35 Personal stories from a couple who have been involved in recent trial of Amazon Echo devices tbc, Rare Dementia Support tbc, Rare Dementia Support Nick Firth, UCL 14:35 – 14:45 Q&A 14:45 – 15:00 'Computers and Assistive Technology, what’s new?' Hector Minto, Microsoft
15:00 – 15:15 An update on the Pedestrian Accessibility & Movement Environment Laboratory (PAMELA) Dr Keir Yong, UCL Ian McCarthy, UCL 15:15 – 15:25 Q&A 15:25 – 15:40 Qualitative research into dementia and glaucoma Dr Simon Read, Cardiff University 15:40 – 15:55 ‘Which Test is Best?’ Martin Cordiner, The College of Optometrists 15:55 – 16:05 Q&A 16:05 – 16:15 Round up Paul Ursell, The Royal College of Ophthalmologists 16:15 Close
The 5th Oxford Neurology Course Wednesday 25th June – Friday 27th June 2014 Venue: St. Anne’s College, Woodstock Road, Oxford FINAL PROGRAMME Time Wednesday 25th June Thursday 26th June Friday 27th June 7AM URSULA’S OXFORD FUN RUN 0900-0945 Rotten necks and ropey backs: How to navigate spinal degeneration Richard Davenport What every neurologist should know about Wilson’s disease Oliver Bandmann New insights into non-epileptic attacks Markus Reuber Mindfulness: What’s all that about, and who might it help? Niels Detert 0945-1030 1030-1100 COFFEE COFFEE 1100-1145 Knowing your -omabs from your -umabs: A guide to immunomodulation Neil Scolding The neurology of coeliac disease Marios Hadjivassiliou The borderlands of PD Michele Hu Dealing with jerks Peter Brown 1145-1230 Arrival and registration: St. Anne’s College, Oxford 1230-1330 LUNCH LUNCH LUNCH 1330-1415 Where Neurology meets…Cardiology: Tilting tables and other dark arts Tim Betts The neurology and mythology of the PFO Ursula Schulz Is USA Neurology better, or just different? Gabe De Luca A neurological journey down the spice route Jayam Lazarus 1415-1500 A Medical Walking Tour Of Oxford 1500-1530 COFFEE COFFEE 1530-1615 What the grown-up neurologist needs to know about children Tony McShane The neurologists’ guide to paediatric neurosurgery Jay Jayamohan Best Of Oxford’s Grand Round (3 cases) Drs Le Heron, TBC, TBC Dr Martin Turner (Chair) 1615-1700 1700-1800 SPECIAL GUEST LECTURE Prehistory and the Sapient Paradox Colin Renfrew SPECIAL GUEST LECTURE Free energy, life, and the brain as we know it Karl Friston 1800-1900 DRINKS RECEPTION 1900- DRINKS RECEPTION & DINNER: WADHAM COLLEGE List of speakers
Club Membership of the Late 1880s: Women and Fin-De-Siecle Authorship, Fulya Kincal ‘Not indeed a good writer of novels’: The Trolling of Sydney Owenson, Sara J. Kerr Authorship, in fiction and theory Chair: Megen de Bruine- Molé Braddon’s ‘Grub-Street Scribbler’: Antonia Thornton the professional writer at the end of Braddon’s career in The Infidel, Helen McKenzie Mary Ward and the Business of Romance, Stephen Edwards Gendering the text – form and content Chair: Evan Hayles Gledhill Ellen Wood’s gender bending – male voices from the quintessential Chloé Holland The Reception of a Nineteenth-Century Female Writer of ‘Unfeminine’ International European Politics, Rachel Egloff Jane Austen: an honorary man, Chiara Codecà Gendering the performer Chair: Fulya Kincal Performing Restraint: Alice Meynell’s American Lecture Tour, 1901-1902, Sarah Parker ‘What an actress this woman is! What an arch trickster – what an all-accomplished deceiver’: Mary Braddon’s Literary, Theatrical, and Personal Performances, Anne-Marie Beller ‘Marry an actress! No words can describe the horror’: Images of the professional actor and propriety in Mabel’s Progress (1867), Eleanor Dumbill Recontextualising – diaries and scrapbooks Chair: Sarah Parker Recovering the Female Poetry Reader: Ann Warton Stock’s Illustrated Commonplace Book (1852-1860), Melissa Tricoire Poaching, Gleaning, Spinning: The Gendered Metaphors of Appropriative Art, Megen de Bruin-Molé Female authorship and celebrity in nineteenth-century Polish theatre: Helena Modrzejewska and her female fans, Agata Łuksza Revisioning the past Chair: Simon Avery
Section 1: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Leadership of the Programme and Key Contacts Programme Leader Sian Onions 01695 650828 Year Leader Wendy Dixon 01695 584420 Subject Leaders English Subject Leader Mary Weston 01695 584401 Mathematics Subject Leaders Debbie Hooton David Boorman 01695 657334 01695 850864 Science Subject Leader Frith Murphy 01695 584135 Computing Subject Leader Carol Darbyshire 01695 584647 Foundation Subjects Subject Leader Sarah Wright 01695 657317 Academic Professional Development (APD) Subject Leader Nichola Callander 01695 650819 Professional Support Team Primary Support Team Leader Helen Wakenshaw 01695 650801 PGCE Programme Administrator Amy Lowe 01695 6450804 PGCE Professional Practice Administrator Jenny Mawdsley 01695 650834
Module Leaders Mike Goulding PED1012 Foundation Subjects Ian Shirley PED1013 Minor Specialism Martin Ford PED1015/1016 Academic and Professional Development Claire Buck (English) Martin Ford (Computing) PED1017 English and Computing Frith Murphy (Science) Cheryl Cooper (Mathematics) PED1018 Mathematics and Science Wendy Dixon PED1111 Primary Professional Practice (Phase 1a)
Student Voice Overview September October November December January February March April May June July Aug. Potential Trainees Feedback questionnaire after each open event/recruitment event Feedback questionnaire after each interview, including questions about the rigour of the selection process Trainees First Week/ Induction Day Survey Partnership Programmes Board SSCF Student Consultative Meeting 1 HoA Focus Group ITT Board Faculty Board SSCF Student Consultative Meeting 1 SERIM Mid-year ‘Big Evaluation’ NSS Survey SSCF Student Consultative Meeting 2 Partnership Programmes Board ISS Survey ITT Board Faculty Board End of year ‘Big Evaluation’ Partnership Programmes Board ITT Board Faculty Board Focus Group SERIM NQTs/ Former Trainees Partnership Programmes Board ITT Board Faculty Board NQT Survey Partnership Programmes Board NQT/CPD Conference Feedback ITT Board Faculty Board Employability Survey ITT Board Faculty Board Focus Group RQTs/ Past Trainees Partnership Programmes Board ITT Board Faculty Board Partnership Programmes Board ITT Board Faculty Board Employability Survey ITT Board Faculty Board Focus Group Feedback to Trainees after: SSCF Meetings, Focus Groups, Mid-year ‘Big Evaluation’ and End of year ‘Big Evaluation’ Information (meeting records and feedback) shared on the VLE, in module handbooks and in teaching sessions with all trainees.
Boscombe Market Pitch Fees 2015 / 2016 The criteria for pitch fees are as follows: The cost of a larger pitch or site for service, i.e. catering van, will be agreed and stated on the fee schedule Electricity and refuse collection will be an additional charge Single Pitch = 3m x 3m Single Pitch Double Pitch Triple Pitch X 4 Pitch X 6 Pitch X 8+ Pitch Casual Rate Applicable to stall holders arriving on the day A pitch will be allocated subject to availability £30 £35 £40 £45 £50 £55 Basic Rate Applicable to regular stallholders £25 £30 £35 £40 £45 £50 Corporate promotional companies will be charged at the casual rate Agreed Trading Days General Thursday Foodie Friday General Saturday Please check you have enclosed the following: Copy of your Public Liability Insurance Photograph of Stall (If unable to take a photograph, one will be taken for you) DECLARATION I declare that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the answers given within this application are true. If consent is given, I will pay the above agreed fee and comply with Boscombe Markets Rules & Regulations as well as the Terms & Conditions as set out in the Stallholder Agreement. I also agree to comply with the Terms & Conditions of the Boscombe Precinct Vehicle Permit. Print Name: ______________________________________________________________________________________ Sign: ____________________________________________________ Date: / / This form and enclosures should be given to the Market Manager or sent to the address below: Boscombe Market Manager Unit 1, 8 Roumelia Lane Bournemouth BH5 1EU
Section 1: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Leadership of the Programme and Key Contacts Programme Leader Level 4 Leader Polly Thorpe 01695 650823 Level 5 Leader Ian Shirley 01695 650998 Level 6 Leader Louise Hawxwell 01695 584715 Subject Leaders English Subject Leader Mary Weston 01695 584401 Mathematics Subject Leaders Debbie Hooton David Boorman 01695 657334 01695 850864 Science Subject Leader Frith Murphy 01695 584135 Computing Subject Leader Carol Darbyshire 01695 584647 Foundation Subjects Subject Leader Sarah Wright Academic Professional Development (APD) Subject Leader Nichola Callander 01695 650819 Professional Support Team 01695 650804 01695 650834 Module Leaders
Be careful how you express yourself. Email can easily convey the wrong impression Remember that people other than the person to whom it's addressed may see your message At the start of an email conversation always use a salutation (e.g. Dear Tony, Hi Tony, Good Afternoon Tony etc…) and sign off (Many thanks, Tony, Kind regards, Tony etc…) Never email something you wouldn't say to the recipient's face Always put your full name and group number at the bottom of any email as tutors teach many trainees often with the same name
Year 3 Term 1 PED 2016P PED 2222P Year 3 Term 2 PED 2011P Level 6 Year 3 Term 3 PED3011P Year 4 Term 1 PED 3010P PED 3012/13/14/15P PED3016P Year 4 Term 2 PED 3333P Year 4 Term 3 Timetable (Sometimes referred to as an XX Grid)
Student Voice Overview September October November December January February March April May June July Aug. Potential Trainees Feedback questionnaire after each open event/recruitment event Feedback questionnaire after each interview, including questions about the rigour of the selection process Trainees First Week/ Induction Day Survey Partnership Programmes Board SSCF Student Consultative Meeting 1 HoA Focus Group ITT Board Faculty Board SSCF Student Consultative Meeting 1 SERIM Mid-year ‘Big Evaluation’ NSS Survey SSCF Student Consultative Meeting 2 Partnership Programmes Board ISS Survey ITT Board Faculty Board End of year ‘Big Evaluation’ Partnership Programmes Board ITT Board Faculty Board Focus Group SERIM NQTs/ Former Trainees Partnership Programmes Board ITT Board Faculty Board NQT Survey Partnership Programmes Board NQT/CPD Conference Feedback ITT Board Faculty Board Employability Survey ITT Board Faculty Board Focus Group RQTs/ Past Trainees Partnership Programmes Board ITT Board Faculty Board Partnership Programmes Board ITT Board Faculty Board Employability Survey ITT Board Faculty Board Focus Group Feedback to Trainees after: SSCF Meetings, Focus Groups, Mid-year ‘Big Evaluation’ and End of year ‘Big Evaluation’ Information (meeting records and feedback) shared on the VLE, in module handbooks and in teaching sessions with all trainees.
The first documentary on J. M. Coetzee, originally screened on SABC, 1997 [original video 1999]. Directed by Henion HAN, Produced by Cheryl TUCKETT. See the review from the now archived SOAS Literary Review: 19h00-19h30 KEYNOTE CONVERSATION Dada & Coetzee [film screening] BLOOMSBURY ROOM / G35 Derek ATTRIDGE (York) and David ATTWELL (York): ‘Revisiting Coetzee: Authorship & the Archives’ Introduction: Kai EASTON (SOAS) DAY 2: Friday, 6 October 2017 09h00-10h00 Life Writing - A Roundtable BRUNSWICK ROOM / G7 Polona JONIK (Sussex), ‘Coetzee’s Life Writing’: Perseverance, Archive, Ethics’ Charlotte TERRELL (Sussex), ‘“I am, by constitution, a writer”: Coetzee's Literary Economies’ David ISAACS (UCL), ‘”Second Thoughts to the Power of n’”: Textual Revision and Confession in Summertime’ Pre-circulated papers and brief presentations Chair: Elleke BOEHMER (Oxford) 10h00-11h00 Archiving the Academy BRUNSWICK ROOM / G7 Andrew DEAN (Oxford) Foes no more? The Academy & the Archive Paul STEWART (Nicosia), ‘In Pursuit of Style: Coetzee Reading Beckett in the Archive’ Discussant: Shaun IRLAM (SUNY-Buffalo) Tea and coffee JESSEL ROOM 11h30-12h30 Lessons in the Archives: The Lives of Animals SENATE ROOM Richard A. BARNEY (SUNY-Albany), ‘Coetzee, Biopolitics, and the Archive of Impersonality’
Table 3. Yields Observation Pumpkin Cultivar Performance Trial. Variety Pounds per Acre Pounds per Plant Fruit per Acre Average Fruit Weight (lbs.) Seed Source Orange Sunrise 63434.25 58.25 14157 17.92 Rupp RPX6903 59677.2 54.8 5445 32.88 Rupp Tallon 34457.77 31.64 8712 23.73 Rupp RPX6879 29522.79 27.11 6534 22.59 Rupp RPX6851 26771.97 24.58 4356 30.73 Rispen Seed RPX6890 18841.51 17.3 9801 11.53 Rispen Seed Figure 1. Exterior of top five varieties in the 2017 Pumpkin Cultivar Performance Trial. Figure 2. Exterior of specialty varieties in the 2017 Pumpkin Cultivar Performance Trial.
Material Alteration 34 As stated previously in our comments regarding material alteration #16, Celbridge Community Council would prefer to see this new roads objective retained as current residents of the town feel this is sorely lacking for the western side of the town without a single extra house being built but accepts that a Western Link Road would be a significant infrastructural project and that the additional river crossing must be prioritised over it. If the Western Link Road is not going to be built during the lifetime of this Local Area Plan then, instead of removing objective MTO3.9, it should be changed to cover protection of the route from development as there is a strong chance that this is transport infrastructure that will be needed in the longer term (when development at the site of the originally planned Oldtown KDA can be done in a more sustainable manner). Celbridge Community Council has a number of concerns about traffic flow particularly during morning and evening rush times and if this new roads objective is removed then solutions for alleviating these problems need to be identified by the proposed Transport Management Plan and implementation of these solutions need to become prerequisites for development at both the Oldtown and Crodaun KDAs. The re-wording of the objective should make reference to taking actions to alleviate traffic congestion to the north and west of the town based on recommendations arising from the Transport Management Plan. Material Alteration 35 Celbridge Community Council welcomes this alteration, and suggests that the objective is enhanced to put a timeframe on the preparation of the Transport Plan/ Strategy and to actively include representation from the community as follows: “To prepare, before 2019, a Transport Management Plan and Public Transport Strategy for Celbridge to support the sustainable growth and development of the town and to identify strategic connections for pedestrian, cyclist, bus and vehicle movement in consultation with statutory agencies and key stakeholders, including representatives from the local community.” Material Alteration 36 Celbridge Community Council welcomes this alteration. Chapter 10 Built & Natural Heritage Material Alteration 38 Celbridge Community Council welcomes this alteration. Chapter 11 Green Infrastructure & Strategic Open Spaces Material Alteration 39 Celbridge Community Council welcomes this alteration. Material Alteration 40 Celbridge Community Council welcomes this alteration, and suggest that the objective is enhanced as follows: “Amend objective OSO1.6 as follows: To maintain and protect, from inappropriate development, the greenbelt between Leixlip, Celbridge and Maynooth. This greenbelt is shown on Map XX”
$1.7 million was allocated to 391 patients who were not discharged by the end of the financial year. These patients and their allocated costs were removed from the dataset and will be submitted to IHPA in future rounds of the NHCDC. Reconciliation with IHPA Table 77 below compares the total costs and activity records submitted by the jurisdiction with the total costs and activity records that were received by IHPA. A variance of $75,000 was noted, which represents 0.02% of the total costs dataset. Table : Reconciliation of total costs and activity submitted
Site visit attendees Jurisdiction IHPA representative Jurisdictional and hospital/LHN representatives Peer representative PwC representative NSW Angela Leary-Smith Julia Heberle Tania O’Brien Nick de Groot Raymond Lal Stephen Johnson Katey Yang Yasuko Nakano Christine Gong Charlie Farrah Rachel Knoblanche David Debono Graham Bushnell Julia Strelitz Laila Qasem Joe Portelli Blake Bentley SA Julia Hume Phillip Battista Silvana Di Ciocco Emma Martin Colin McCrow Laila Qasem Ruan Jordaan TAS Joanne Siviloglou Kristian Murray Ian Jordan Joe Portelli Yasmin Clarke WA Joanne Siviloglou Kevin Frost Paul Smith Howard Andre Rinaldo Ienco Ian Massingham Colin McCrow Joe Portelli Ruan Jordaan QLD Angela Leary-Smith Colin McCrow Leslie Egerton Brett Darracott Janet Moncrieff Dominic Flynn Rod Margetts Brett Darracott Geoff Evans Mitch Price Karen Stewart Allan Lawrie Lindy LePatourel Manjinder Daley Karen Gault-Wilde Steve Shea Julia Strelitz Joe Portelli Blake Bentley VIC Joanne Siviloglou David Debono Kim Lim Ross Arblaster Graham Bushnell Tyrone Patterson Kylie Hawkins Stuart Shinfield Laila Qasem Abraam Gregiouro NT Stathi Tsangaris Ian Pollock Kim Lim Joe Portelli Ruan Jordaan ACT Joanne Siviloglou Winston Piddington Ian Pollock Julia Strelitz Abraam Gregiouro
1. Definitions In these by-laws, unless the context indicates otherwise – “Agricultural purpose”, in relation to the use of a property, excludes the use of a property for the purpose of ecotourism or for the trading in or hunting of game; “Annually” means once every financial year; “Category” – in relation to property, means a category of property determined in terms of section 4 of these by-laws; in relation to owners of property, means a category of owners of property determined in terms of section 5 of these by-laws; “Exemption”, in relation to the payment of a rate, means an exemption granted in terms of section 8 of these by-laws; “Land tenure right” means an old order right or a new order right as defined in section 1 of the Communal Land Rights Act, 2004 (Act No. # of 2004); “Multiple purposes”, in relation to property, means the use of property for more than one purpose; “Municipal council” or “council” means a municipal council referred to in section 18 of the Local Government: Municipal Structures Act, 1998 (Act No. 117 of 1998); “Municipality” means the Municipality established in terms of section 155(6) of the Constitution, 1996, and established by and under section 11 and 12 of the Local Government: Municipal Structures Act, 1998 (Act No. 117 of 1998), read with sections 3, 4 and 5 of the KwaZulu-Natal Determination of Types of Municipality Act, 2000 (Act No. 7 of 2000). “Owner” – (a) In relation to property referred to in paragraph (a) of the definition of “property”, means a person in whose name ownership of the property is registered;
An Appeal to Facts in a “Fact Check” A Response to the Union of Concerned Scientists Critique of BHI’s Renewable Portfolio Studies The Beacon Hill Institute at Suffolk University 8 Ashburton Place Boston, MA 02108 Tel: 617-573-8750, Fax: 617-994-4279 Email: , Web: November 2013 On , ad hominem is at the second lowest rung, one step above name calling. Instead of focusing on arguments against the Beacon Hill Institute's policy studies, time and time again organizations like the have chosen primarily to engage in ad hominem. We will instead address the best of their arguments against our analysis. , Assistant Director of Research & Analysis of clean energy for Union of Concerned Scientists, leans in part on a
Appendix D Introduction of Let’s Go! 5-2-1-0 Let’s Go! is helping kids and families eat healthy and be active. They understand it’s important to have a consistent message about healthy habits where you live, learn, work and play. They partner with teachers, doctors, child care providers, and community organizations to help share the same four healthy habits of “5 2 1 0” everyday: 5 – fruits and veggies 2 – hours or less of recreational screen time* 1 – hour or more of physical activity 0 – sugary drinks, more water and low-fat milk Introduction of StoryWalk Why have a StoryWalk? Let’s Go! wanted to offer an activity rich in literacy and healthy movement. A StoryWalk™ is a great simple way to encourage physical activity and increase reading among youth and families. The story you are going to read today is about Matt the Rat. The story is titled, Matt the Rat Fights Back. Matt the Rat has been eating too much junk food until one day he discovers his
(a) The COMMISSION shall consist of seven members and three alternates. The Mayor shall appoint all members and alternates, subject to City Council confirmation. The COMMISSION shall include at least one member who owns property in the DISTRICT; one member from two nominees solicited from the City of Holyoke’s Historical Commission; one member from two nominees solicited from the chapter of the American Institute of Architects covering Holyoke; and one member from two nominees of the Board of Realtors covering Holyoke. If within thirty (30) days after submission of a written request for nominees to an organization entitled to submit nomination for membership on the COMMISSION, no such nominations have been made, the Mayor may proceed to appoint the COMMISSION without nomination by such organization. Initial appointments to the COMMISSION shall be as follows: three members to be appointed for one year, two members for two years and two members for three years. Successive appoints shall be for three years. (d) Alternate members need not be from organizations entitled to nominate members. Each alternate member shall have the right to act and vote in the place of one regular member should such regular member be absent from a meeting or be unwilling or unable to act or vote. Two alternate members shall initially be appointed for terms of two years and one shall be appointed for three years, and for three-year terms thereafter. 3. Members of the COMMISSION shall, at the beginning of each fiscal year hold an organizational meeting and elect a new Chairman, a Vice Chairman and a Secretary from its members. Notice of such election shall be filed with the Office of the City Clerk. 4. Each member and alternate member shall continue to serve in office after the expiration date of his or her term until a successor is duly appointed. 5. Meetings of the COMMISSION shall be held at the call of the Chairman, at the request of two members in such other matters as the COMMISSION shall determine in its Rules and Regulations. 6. Four members or alternates of the COMMISSION shall constitute a quorum. Sec. 18 - 96. Commission power and duties.
unwanted feline pregnancies (Nutter et al., 2004). Restricting the times and areas that cats can roam can also help reduce the transmission of the disease Toxoplasma gondii (Dabritz and Conrad, 2010) and cat faecal pollution of waterways (Dabritz et al., 2006). The Contentiousness of Cat Containment Policies that involve confining domestic cats are controversial. According to a survey on cat containment in Victoria, some cat owners think it is “cruel and unnatural to confine a cat for 24 hours to a property” and “were concerned about the welfare and happiness of cats during confinement” (Toukhsati et al., 2012, p. 63). In Tasmania, cat-owners who sometimes or never contain cats are more likely to think cats have strong physical and emotional needs to be outside, and are less confident in their ability to effectively contain their cats (McLeod et al., 2015). According to an ABC news article, some pet-owners do not see a need for cat containment, and consider the issue of biodiversity loss because of roaming cats to contain “a certain amount of ‘alternative fact’’ (ABC, 2017). Cat Containment in the ACT In Australia, there have been campaigns urging cat owners to contain their cats since the 1990s (McLeod et al., 2015), however, at the state or territory level, only the ACT has established any form of cat containment area. In designated areas in the ACT, cat containment requires cat owners to confine cats to their properties 24-7. If a cat is found outside of their owner’s property, it can be seized by Territory and Municipal Services (TAMS), and cat owners can be fined up to $1500. Under Section 81 of the Domestic Animals Act 2000, cat containment has been declared in 12 suburbs in the ACT, including Crace, Bonner, Coombs, Denman Prospect, Forde, Jacka, Lawson, Molonglo, Moncrieff, The Fair at Watson, Throsby and Wright. These suburbs were identified as areas of serious nature conservation threat because of hunting by cats (ACT Government, 2018). The Transport Canberra and City Services Directorate, and Domestic Animal Services, are responsible for compliance and enforcement of cat containment in the ACT. However, there has been little actual policing of cat containment in the ACT (Maxwell, 2016). Although the Domestic Animals ACT (2000) allows regulating bodies to seize and capture domestic animals
Appendix A: Categorisation of Phenacoccus aceris with fresh stone fruit from China Pest Present in China Present within Australia Potential to be on pathway Potential for establishment and spread Potential for economic consequences Pest risk assessment required HEMIPTERA Phenacoccus aceris (Signoret, 1875) [Pseudococcidae] Apple mealybug Yes (Raine, McMullen & Forbes 1986; Wu 2000) No records found Yes. Nymphs feed on fruit and bark (MAL 2007) on a wide range of hosts including stone fruit such as nectarines, peaches, plums and apricots (Beers 2007; García et al. 2015; Kaydan, Kilinçer & Kondo 2015; Mani & Shivaraju 2016; Trencheva & Tomov 2014). Yes. Phenacoccus aceris attacks more than 100 host plants, some of which include apples, citrus, pears, stone fruit, cherries, pine trees, potato, hibiscus, rose, banana, catalpa, mulberry, honeysuckle, camellia and rhododendron (García et al. 2015; Kaydan, Kilinçer & Kondo 2015; Trencheva & Tomov 2014) and many of these hosts are present in Australia. Phenacoccus aceris occurs in many parts of Asia, Europe, Africa and North and South America (García et al. 2017), indicating parts of the Australian environment would be suitable for its establishment. Yes. This species is known to vector little cherry disease (little cherry closterovirus) (Dodds & Browne 2016; Mekuria, Zhang & Eastwell 2014; Raine, McMullen & Forbes 1986; Sforza, Boudon-Padieu & Greif 2003) which is present in Australia (IPPC 2015). Little cherry virus 2 (LChV2) (genus Ampelovirus) is the primary causal agent of little cherry disease in sweet cherry in North America and other parts of the world. Infected trees produce poor quality fruit that unevenly ripen (IPPC 2015; Mekuria, Zhang & Eastwell 2014). Yes
KANTIPUR ENGINEERING COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING DHAPAKHEL, LALITPUR GUIDELINES FOR PREPARATION OF PROJECT REPORT (Final Year Project) Introduction Project report in this manual refers to a documented report of the process followed and the results of final year project conducted by a student in fulfillment of the requirements in bachelor degree. This report will outline the report format for Final Year Project. These rules must be adhered strictly. Contents of Project report The Project Report should contain the items as outlined below and is to be presented in the order as listed. Details and specimens are shown in the appendices. Number of Copies to be submitted to the Department Two copies of the report with hard binding are to be submitted to the Department after corrections done as suggested by guide/Department at any time when report submission is called by guide/Department. A soft copy (pdf format) should be submitted to Department in CD along with report. Requirements for Report Writing: Your report should meet following standards: Font Name: Times New Roman Left Margin: 1.5 inch Right Margin: 1.25 inch Top Margin: 1.25 inch Bottom Margin: 1.25 inch Header and Footer: 0.5 inch
Review Panel recommendations The Review Panel considers that the Regulations are still required and could be improved by making minor amendments to the following policies for administration and operation of the IFIS. More certification options Permit a recognised quality assurance certificate as an alternative to the current mandatory foreign government certification requirement for some risk-classified foods. This new policy would provide flexibility for industry which would be able to use a quality assurance certificate if there was no recognised foreign government certificate arrangement to demonstrate the safety of its food. More effective inspection of prohibited plants and fungi Make any amount of a prohibited plant or fungus subject to the Act because they have potential to affect human health if consumed. This would not prevent importers from putting their case to the department that the food was intended for private consumption and therefore exempt from the Act. Improved scrutiny of risk-classified food Reduce the imported amount of risk-classified food that is considered to be for private consumption from 10 kilograms to one kilogram in any one consignment. Changing patterns of commercial imports indicate that high-value, low-volume imports of risk- classified foods are occurring for commercial purposes. Amounts once considered for private consumption are now being used for commercial trade. Modernising the inspection and analysis of foods Amend the Regulations to address each of the following issues: some rules have never been applied and on review are considered unnecessary other rules do not provide for a hazard to be initially analysed at a reduced rate for a risk classified food the rules which govern how inspection rates are reduced for risk classified foods are no longer consistent with the current Australian Standard 1199-1988 (Sampling procedures and tables for inspection by attributes) and other relevant international standards the need for more transparency in how the department determines what analyses it will apply to surveillance foods. Flexibility in the inspection of surveillance food Provide greater flexibility with the way that the department allocates the five per cent inspection ‘envelope’ across all surveillance-classified foods. With this flexibility, the department could target infrequent and new food importers for inspection, or conduct other short-term targeted inspection activity in response to information gaps or community concerns. The department could then reduce
8th meeting 3/10/17 – Plan device on wheelchair and plan housing unit 9th meeting 3/17/17 – Test prototype 1 and see where problems are 10th meeting 3/24/17 – Test prototype 2 and see if problems were solved 11th meeting 3/31/17 – Assemble final seat and get ready to present to VA 12th meeting 4/8/17 – Usability Testing with clients Meeting with Advisor: 1st meeting 1/19 – Updated Advisor on the Project goals. This meeting was strictly to make sure the advisor understood what the design of the project was. Our advisor approved all of our material selection, and methods of carrying out our design project. 2nd meeting 2/8 – Brought seat components for approval and displayed our integration. This was the first time our advisor saw our inflatable bladders. He was impressed with the ability to achieve an air tight seal, and how much weight the bladder could hold. 3rd meeting 2/15 – Asked for coding help and help with circuitry for mechanical components. The circuit was approved for use in the project. A sample resistor, transistor, and diode were brought to test out the Arduino with the circuit. The circuit was approved, and effective in achieving the desired goal. 4th meeting 2/22 – Asked for help in testing the devices & finalized methods of testing. This is when the use of the MTS machine was decided to be a sufficient way of testing the effectiveness of the bladders. The motion capture system was approved for final testing of effectiveness of prototype. 5th meeting 2/28 – Updated advisor on progress and testing schedule. This meeting was just to touch base with advisor and ensure that the group was on schedule for the development of the prototype. 6th meeting 3/1 – talk about options for remote, and see if there is a cheap way to do a Bluetooth model 7th meeting 3/8 – Discuss feasibility of our material selections and if there are any alternatives
Appendix V – Description of the Collection and Evaluation Centres Appendix VI – Structure and process diagram of the WDQMS ____________ Agenda SESSION A - OPENING AND ORGANIZATION OF THE WORKSHOP SESSION B1 – CURRENT (RA) LEAD CENTRE MONITORING CAPABILITIES SESSION B2 – NATIONAL MONITORING REPORTS SESSION C1 – NWP BASED MONITORING CAPABILITIES SESSION C2 – OTHER WIGOS COMPONENT MONITORING REPORTS SESSION D – PILOT PROJECTS SESSION E – ACTION PLAN AND RECOMMENDATIONS SESSION F - ANY OTHER BUSINESS SESSION G – CLOSURE __________
Tuesday AM, 15 December 2015 TIMING SPEAKER SESSION / PRESENTATION TITLE Session A – Opening and Organization of the Workshop 09:30 Stuart Goldstraw, Met Office UK, Chair of the Workshop Introductory remarks – goals of the workshop 09:45 Director OBS Department, WMO Secretariat Welcome and opening remarks 10:00 Lars Peter Riishojgaard, WIGOS Project Manager The WDQMS in the context of the WPP 10:15 Stuart Goldstraw, Met Office UK, Chair of the Workshop Review of the outcomes from the 1st workshop 10:30 … Coffee-Break … Session B1 – Current (RA) Lead Centre Monitoring Capabilities 11:00 Henry Karanja Kenya/RA I 11:15 Ota Yukinari Japan/RA II 11:30 Robert Grumbine USA/RA IV 11:45 Riris Adriyanto Indonesia/RA V 12:00 Stefan Klink Germany/RA VI Session B2 – National Monitoring Reports 12:15 Hamza Kabelva Tanzania 12:30 … Lunch-Break … Tuesday PM, 15 December 2015
12:00 Stuart Goldstraw Quality Monitoring pilot project design 12:15 Stefan Klink Incident Management pilot project design 12:30 … Lunch-Break … Wednesday PM, 16 December 2015 SCHEDULE SPEAKER/LEAD PRESENTATION/SUBJECT Session D – Pilot Projects – BREAK-OUT GROPUS (Cont.) 14:00 Stuart Goldstraw Quality Monitoring pilot project design Stefan Klink Incident Management pilot project design 15:30 … Coffee-Break … Session D – Pilot Projects – PLENARY (Cont.) 16:00 Stuart Goldstraw Quality Monitoring pilot project design update 16:30 Stefan Klink Incident Management pilot project design update 17:00 … End of Day 2 … Thursday AM, 17 December 2015 SCHEDULE SPEAKER/LEAD PRESENTATION/SUBJECT Session D – Pilot Projects – BREAK-OUT GROPUS (Cont.) 09:00-12:00 Stuart Goldstraw Quality Monitoring pilot project design finalise Stefan Klink Incident Management pilot project finalise (10:30) … Coffee-Break …
Table . Risk factors of older person Risk factors of older person % all types of abuse % of financial abuse % of abuse % of physical abuse % of social abuse % of neglect % of sexual abuse Family violence 11 9.7 14.4 32 17.9 0 50 Family conflict 34.3 33.7 38.5 33.3 38.5 16.7 0 Older person financially dependent on alleged perpetrator 7 8.2 6.7 8 12.8 16.7 0 Isolation 14.1 14.3 16.7 10.7 20.5 33.3 0 Older person has gambling or other addiction 1.1 1.1 1.9 1.3 2.6 0 0 Lack of appropriate services 11.4 9 14.1 16 10.3 16.7 0 Lack of information about rights 26.2 26.2 30 24 23.1 33.3 50 Language barrier 10.8 10 11.9 13.3 10.3 0 0 Living alone 21.8 23.3 19.3 9.3 17.9 0 50 Living with abuser 38.7 34.4 49.6 57.6 66.7 66.7 0 Mental ill health 5.7 6.5 5.6 6.7 5.1 33.3 0 Mental incompetency 3.7 4.3 2.6 0 5.1 33.3 0 Physical dependency on abuser 5.7 7.2 5.6 5.3 10.3 16.7 0 Poor financial acumen 6.8 9.3 5.2 1.3 10.3 16.7 0 Poor physical health 30.5 29 31.9 32 38.5 66.7 0 Psychological dependency on abuser 7.3 9.3 8.5 12 12.8 16.7 0 Substance abuse 0.7 0.7 0.7 2.7 0 0 0 Unwilling to accept services 2 1.4 3 5.3 2.6 0 0 Dysfunctional/ Overbearing/ Overburdened or Geographically isolated 18.5 18.3 18.5 20 12.8 33.3 0 Family history of 10.1 7.2 11.9 29.3 17.9 0 0
Table . Referrals made by SRV staff during advice call Type of referral # of referrals made to 455 clients who reported abuse % (of 455 clients who reported abuse) # of referrals made to 236 clients who reported issues % (of 236 clients who reported issues) Other (unspecified external referral) 63 13.8 49 20.8 Police 53 11.6 5 2.1 Counselling 34 7.5 10 4.2 Community Legal Centre 33 7.3 3 1.3 GP 29 6.4 10 4.2 Magistrate’s Court 25 5.5 - - Dispute settlement/mediation services 25 5.5 11 4.7 Financial counselling 19 4.2 4 1.7 Housing/tenancy service 18 4 9 3.8 Centrelink 16 3.5 6 2.5 Local council 14 3.1 9 3.8 Carers Victoria 13 2.9 7 3 Community Care Provider 12 2.6 3 1.3 ACAS 11 2.4 5 2.1 Family violence service 11 2.4 - - VCAT 9 2 9 3.8 Telephone helpline 9 2 1 0.4 Lawyer (private) 7 1.5 8 3.4 Alcohol and other drug service 7 1.5 - - Community Health Centre 5 1.1 1 0.4 Legal referral service 5 1.1 3 1.3 Elder Rights Advocacy 4 0.9 3 1.3 Home and Community Care 4 0.9 1 0.4 Consumer Affairs Victoria 4 0.9 1 0.4
Background information I note the following document which refers to Self Service Kiosks in police stations and Hubs: “Frontline Self Service Kiosks: Forensic analysis carried out by police officers using locally based SSKs. Frontline Supported Service: HUBS: Forensic analysis carried out with the support of or by the Authority’s digital forensic technicians and assistants and providing for police officers to be assisted and trained to perform their own downloads." The document goes on to state: “retention periods will depend on the crime type but could extend to years which will necessitate long term archiving of data.” In addition: 1. North Yorkshire Report which refers to ‘examination of mobile phones at a District level’ 2. Wiltshire PEEL report which refers to ‘specialist equipment has been introduced which allows staff with basic training to conduct limited mobile phone examinations’… 3. Avon & Somerset PEEL report which states ‘HMIC identified that the constabulary lacked capacity in the recovery of digital evidence. … New technology means that downloading kiosks are available to speed up the process and an increasing number of officers have been trained to use them.’ 4. Durham PEEL report which states ‘The majority of mobile phones are now examined by local officers trained to carry out a limited examination of evidence retained on these devices. The constabulary has purchased computer software designed to provide early indicative findings to support these officers in their examination and to ensure that these phones do not need to be submitted to the HTCU for further assessment. The constabulary’s own figures indicate that 90 percent of cases are now examined in this way. Responses 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 & 12: I can confirm that there is no information held by Dyfed Powys Police. Response 3: I can confirm that Dyfed Powys Police did trial the kiosk product and found that it did not suit the forces’ needs.
Every 26 seconds, a student drops out. #Mentoring can change that. bit.ly/1WkOr0C @attendanceworks #SchoolEveryDay #MentorIRL #Mentored at-risk students are 36% more likely to stay in school. bit.ly/1PXFB8@attendanceworks #SchoolEveryDay #MentorIRL How do you stress importance of attendance to youth in your life? bit.ly/1WkOr0C @attendanceworks #SchoolEveryDay #MentorIRL The truth behind 4 common school attendance myths. bit.ly/1rd33E0 @attendanceworks #SchoolEveryDay #MentorIRL RT if you believe that EVERY school day counts! bit.ly/SePfuo @attendanceworks #SchoolEveryDay #MentorIRL Sample Facebook/LinkedIn Posts September is Attendance Awareness Month! [ORGANIZATION NAME] is working with Attendance Works and MENTOR: The National Mentoring Partnership to raise awareness and help decrease chronic absence in our schools today. Learn more about Attendance Awareness Month and how mentors can help students stay connected to school: #MentorIRL Mentoring is a great way to promote education and has been proven to increase attendance in mentees. Students who meet regularly with their mentors are 52% less likely than their peers to skip a day of school and 55% more likely to aspire to enroll in college. By having a positive impact on just one student’s attendance, mentors have a positive effect on learning in the classroom for all students. Learn more about mentoring and academic achievement here: #MentorIRL #SchoolEveryDay Sample Instagram Post #Mentoring is proven to help promote education and reduce student absences in communities all over the country. When kids are in school and learning our communities grow stronger. Learn more about what you can do to help the youth in your life feel positive about school. #MentorIRL the following In Real Life & Attendance Week memes and share them on social media, along with the sample messaging provided above. How to participate leading up to and throughout the month of September:
Ward Polling Dist. Polling Station Original Request From Submissions Received (ACTING) RETURNING OFFICER’S / ELECTORAL OFFICERS’ RECOMMENDATIONS No Change From Change From Church Hill CHB Abbeywood 1st School Cease use of school School Governors via Chair No Change 2 x Ward Cllrs Reiteration of original request. Suggested use of:- St Andrews Church YMCA Building Willow Trees (Community Centre) Health Centre School Governors via Chair Sites were visited by the Returning Officer and Electoral Services Manager. It was noted current access to school is not ideal. In terms of suggestions made: There is no pedestrian access to the church crossing Tanhouse Lane Access to YMCA building poor Willow Trees/Church Hill Community Centre is already a polling station – may be able to accommodate but may mean shutting the nursery Could consider Health Centre if suitable room available and willing to allow polling there. Winyates WIB Roman Way 1st Sch Cease use of school Parent No change 2 x Borough Cllrs (one being a ward Cllr) Request to cease use of school. Suggested use of Winyates Barn. Head Teacher of Roman Way 1st School No change. Winyates Barn was considered but access and parking is poor and the Barn is now a Dementia Day Care Centre (6 days a week).
NaCl(aq) + AgNO3(aq) -----> AgCl(s) + NaNO3(aq) 33. Find the ΔH for the reaction below, given the following reactions and subsequent ΔH values: N2H4 (l) + CH4O(l) → CH2O(g) + N2 (g) + 3H2 (g) I. 2NH3 (g) → N2H4 (l) + H2 (g) ΔH = 22.5 kJ II. 2NH3 (g) → N2 (g) + 3H2(g) ΔH = 57.5 kJ III. CH2O(g) + H2 (g) → CH4O(l) ΔH = 81.2 kJ