A sustainability target plan (aligned with the 2037 strategic plan), which includes a set of indicators linked to the IAP cities global framework and ISO 37120 housing and resilience) to deepen their evidence based in areas of greatest need, rather than conducting a full city diagnosis, which they have done. The social housing study is an important part of transport oriented development, but the project will no longer finance an urban mobility plan. The social housing study and the resilience plans will contribute to the evidence base of the city master plan, however the project will no longer finance compilation of the city master plan. Instead there now more focus on the community driven long term vision of the city, Recife 500 Plan (Recife 2037 strategic plan), in line with the GEF programme objectives of promoting integrated sustainable planning. The sectoral assessments have been replaced with the resilience plan, in line with the needs to city and the aim of the GEF programme of promoting resilience. Finally, rather than linking the city’s sustainability target plan, 2017-2020 with IAP and ISO indicators, the city will now develop an information management system (IMS) for the implementation of the city’s sector plans, and track these against indicators for the city’s Recife 500 year plan. Web-based Platform for integrated and sustainable planning in Recife developed and operational 1.2.R. Geo-referenced Integrated Management System (IMS) is tested. 1.3.R. Lessons learned collected and structured to serve as input to the national platform Component 2 - Integrated Investment Pilots Cities investments demonstrate the benefits resulting from integrated and sustainable planning in Brasilia Planning and restoration in two watersheds in the urban periphery of Brasilia to manage the quality of drinking for Brasilia and for testing land use management including for agriculture. Pilot remediation techniques of contaminated soil surrounding the dumpsite. Education and social mobilization to create culture of responsibility and increase awareness of the population about existing environmental technologies for energy saving (enabling the partnership with educational institutions) 2.1.B. Springs preservation completed, best practices implemented and open dumpsite monitored towards decommissioning. All mentioned PIF deliverables are now included in this integrated output 2020
PART iII: certification by gef partner agency(ies) GEF Agency(ies) certification This request has been prepared in accordance with GEF policies and procedures and meets the GEF criteria for CEO endorsement under GEF-6. Agency Coordinator, Agency Name Signature Date Project Contact Person Telephone Email Address Brennan Van Dyke, GEF Coordination Office, UNEP November 28, 2016 Ruth Coutto UNEP/GEF Climate Change Mitigation Task Manager, Energy, Climate, and Technology Branch Division of Technology, Industry and Economics (DTIE) +33 1 44 37 16 34 Ruth.Coutto@unep.org
ANNEX A: PROJECT RESULTS FRAMEWORK (either copy and paste here the framework from the Agency document, or provide reference to the page in the project document where the framework could be found). Project Objective Objective level Indicators Baseline Targets and Monitoring Milestones Means of Verification Assumptions & Risks UNEP MTS reference* Lasting and significant changes to which the project is expected to contribute How contributions to the objective will be measured including quantity, quality, time Initial Baseline for Objective End of project Target Mid-Point Target How the information required to measure the indicator will be collected, when, and by whom Assumptions and Risks that affect objective level The under which the project objective can be fitted To promote sustainability in Brazilian Cities through integrated urban planning and innovative technologies O-1 # of cities that join the Sustainable Cities Programme and adopt an enhanced goal plan with SDG indicators 0 EPT: 300 Copies of signed SCP agreements and enhanced goal plans Cities do not see goal plans as a useful planning or policy tool UNEP MTS 2014-2017: Climate Change EA1 and EA2 UNEP MTS 2017-2021: Climate Change EA1 and EA2 Project Outcomes N° Outcome Indicators Baseline Targets and Monitoring Milestones Means of Verification Assumptions & Risks MTS Expected A comprehensive evidence-based integrated and sustainable planning approach is adopted by Brasilia B-1 # of secretaries out of the 10 that use SISDIA for at least 50% of their planning or zoning decisions 0 EPT: 5 Surveys The Secretariats do not see the full benefits of SISDIA and do not keep it up to date with data and information. MTS Climate Change EA2 MTS Climate Change EA2 B-2 Mitigation and adaptation plans and regulation of Climate Bill elaborated and approved with the incorporation of a revised target reduction of emissions 0 EPT: 1 Climate Bill documents The bill may not be adopted in its original form by the FDG.
B-3 % of the 2020-2024 Plan - PPA (in R$) impacted by the adaptation and mitigation plans 0 EPT: 30% Adaptation and mitigation plans, 2020-2024 PPA City planner do not understand the impacts of the mitigation and adaptions plans, and reflecting them in the city PPA. Budgetary constraints and short term problems take precedence in the PPA. A comprehensive evidence-based integrated and sustainable planning approach is adopted by Recife R-1 % of decisions taken by the urban planning agency using the Integrated Management System (IMS) 0 0 MPT: 5% EPT: 30% Surveys The platform is created with the relevant data, (projects, actions, laws, decrees, etc.) but does not have a control centre able to maintain the operation of the system. The key data is not made available to be inserted in the platform. MTS Climate Change EA2 MTS Climate Change EA2 R-2 The city development plan uses the results of the Housing Policy and Resilience Strategy 0 EPT: 100% Land Use Management Plan (POT) The POT is not revised to reflect the project results during the implementation of the GEF project Cities investments demonstrate the benefits resulting from integrated and sustainable planning in Brasilia B-4 % of the 179,660 hectares of the Descoberto and Paranoá watershed under the Sustainability Pact 0 EPT: 80% Written Sustainability Pact agreements (the number of stakeholders signing the pact will be disaggregated by gender). It is not possible to forge a Sustainability Pact with land users in the watersheds that meet planning targets and meet local needs. MTS Climate Change EA1 and EA2 MTS Climate Change EA1 and EA2 B-5 % of decrease in dumpsite activities 6,200 – 8,700 ton/day (2010 and includes EPT: 75% Data records of SLU on incoming waste to the Estrutural Dumpsite The new landfill is not completed and recycling activities have not started. residential
waste) B-6 # a legal framework to promote PV distributed power generation in public buildings ready for adoption 0 EPT: 1 Draft legal framework Pilots are successful and show benefits from distributed generation for public facilities Cities investments demonstrate the benefits resulting from integrated and sustainable planning in Recife R-3 If the pilots prove successful, the city agrees to replicate them 0 Letter of intent covering any or all of the successful pilots (in addition to the ones funded by the project): 2 solar boats; 1 filtering garden; 4.38 ha of 2 docking stations; 5 resting areas, 2 bikes stations 2 electric car park stations; 0.3 km of bike lanes and walking Letter of intent from the Executive Secretary of the Secretariat of Environment and Sustainability of Recife. Pilots are not successful. The Secretary of planning does not allocate funding for scale up. MTS Climate Change EA1 and EA2 MTS Climate Change EA1 and EA2 The tested integrated and sustainable planning solutions are promoted by the National Platform for Sustainable Cities to up to 300 Brazilian cities as the reference for integrated urban planning. KP -1 # of city policy recommendations found relevant by Federal Ministries 0 EPT: 5 Letters of support for policy from Secretary of appropriate Federal Ministry Policies are not found relevant by the Federal Ministries. MTS Climate Change EA2 MTS Climate Change EA2 KP-2 # of solutions identified by Sustainable City Innovation Observatory (SCIO), applied by Brasilia and Recife 0 EPT: 4 Letters of confirmation from Secretaries of Environment/ Planning Brasilia and Recife did not find the solutions appropriate. KP-3 # of cities looking in SCIO and National Platform for solutions to their planning and investment related problems 0 EPT: 100 cities find and apply solutions to their planning or investment problems 50 active SCIO city accounts. Survey to identify which cities have applied a solution from or used a service of the National Platform. Cities do not find the services of the National Platform or SCIO as being relevant or useful to their work.
annex G: M&E BUDGET AND WORK PLAN M&E Activity Description Responsible Parties Timeframe Indicative budget (USD) Inception Workshop (IW) and Report Report prepared immediately following the IW; it includes: Execution: Project Coordinator Support: MCTIC Immediately following, within 2 months of project Co-fin: 3,000 Detailed Work Plan and budget for the first year, as well as an overview of AWPs for subsequent years, divided per output and inputs (budget lines). A more detailed narrative of roles of UNEP, PMU and PSC: institutional responsibilities, coordinating actions and feedback mechanisms Detailed Project Supervision and a M&E Plan Half-yearly progress report; Quarterly financial reports; Part of UNEP procedures for project monitoring. Quarterly financial: Detailed financial reports (in Excel), with justification of any change; progress: Execution: Project Coordinator Support: MCTIC Two (2) reports for any given year (July 31 and January 31); Quarterly financial reports Last progress & financial Reports within 60 days of project closure of operations Part of Project Coordinator and Project Managers tasks Analyses project performance over the reporting period UNEP; Describes constraints experienced in the progress towards results and the reasons Describes Work Plan for the next period in an Annex and the detailed budget divided per output and inputs (budget lines) Technical and thematic Reports; Communication of lessons learnt Technical and thematic periodic reports could also be prepared to focus on specific issues or areas of activity covered by the project, Execution: Project execution partners (UNOPS-Brasilia, ARIES_Recife, CGEE and SCP) Support: Project Coordinator As necessary for the thematic reports Part of Project Coordinator and Project Managers tasks Project Implementation Review (PIR) Analyses project performance over the reporting period UNEP; Describes constraints experienced in the progress towards results and the reasons Execution: Project Coordinator Support: All Project execution partners Yearly, by 31 July latest Part of Project Coordinator and Project
Annex J-3 - SC-IAP Draft GEF tracking tool (2 documents Attached separately) Annex K – OPERATIONAL FOCAL POINT ENDORSEMENT LETTER Annex L – Cofinance Letters Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MCTIC) Government of Federal District (FDG) Municipality of Recife (PPA) Compesa Sustainable Cities Programme UNEP MCTIC Government of Federal District – SLU (Urban Cleaning Services) Government of Federal District – CAESB Municipality of Recife Compesa
B: Description of the consistency of the project with national priorities C: Describe the budgeted M&E plan Part III – Certification by GEF Partner Agency(ies) A: GEF Agency(ies) certification Annex A - Project Results Framework Annex B - Responses to Project Reviews Annex C - Status of implementation of project preparation activities and the use of funds Annex D - Calendar of Expected Reflows Annex E - Consultants to be hired •Annex F-1 - Detailed GEF budget template Annex F-2 - Detailed Cofinance budget template Annex G - M&E Budget and Work Plan Annex H - Project Implementation Arrangements Annex I - Project Workplan and Deliverables Annex J-2 - Estimates of Direct and Indirect GHG emission reduction Annex J-3 - SC-IAP Draft GEF tracking tool (Nov 2015) Annex K - OFP Endorsement Letter template Annex L - Co-financing commitment letters from project partners Annex M - Environmental and Social Safeguards Checklist Annex N - Acronyms and abbreviations