zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Agreed that FSANZ’s analysis of control measures and market information accurately represents how CMPF is being controlled in Australia and New Zealand. The Victorian Departments of Health and Human Services and Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources. Nestle Scion The Society of the Plastics Industry Sealed Air Noted. Risk management options (general comments) Raised by FSANZ response We suggest FSANZ adopt Option 1: Status quo in combination with Option 3a: Education/ awareness/ information programs and Option 3b: Industry self-regulation by industry standards or code of practice. In more detail, this see management of chemicals used in food packaging primarily addressed by maintaining the status quo and still referring to US and EU positive lists. By also implementing Options 3a and 3b, FSANZ can improve the awareness of all stakeholders (in particular SME’s which were identified as the stakeholders with potential gaps in the regulatory knowledge and awareness of regulations from CMPF), and deliver the key information to downstream users through Declaration of Compliance (DoC). Finally we suggest FSANZ conducts risk-based assessments on high risk substances which are identified through routine surveillance or high topic tracking. Training/awareness and risk-based decisions should be included with management of CMPF. Consumers should also be made aware of regulatory and risk mitigation measures enforced by FSANZ, along with general outcomes of surveillance and monitoring outcomes, to support compliance efforts completed by industry. Dupont FSANZ publishes the results of all its surveillance activities on its website and communicates outputs (and their significance) at a range of fora. Option 1: Status quo Not supported. The data collected by FSANZ has demonstrated that chemical migration from packaging into food is low, albeit with further work required to characterise any potential public health risks posed by the phthalates DEHP and DINP. The AFGC agrees that the initial consultations have highlighted gaps in knowledge of chemical migration from packaging into food and understanding of how to address it. As such, the AFGC strongly supports option 3a of providing education, awareness AFGC Noted. has completed further work characterising potential health risks posed by the phthalates DEHP and DINP (see SD3 of this report). Therefore, following application of the graduated risk management approach, FSANZ has not identified any chemicals that meet the criteria for a high risk chemical nor any evidence that the Code needs to be strengthened. To improve awareness and knowledge about
(recycled) 50 – 500 500 - 5000 Imported Plastic mono-layers 0 – 50 50 – 500 500 - 5000 Imported Plastic multi-layers 0 – 50 50 – 500 500 - 5000 Local Imported Plastic laminate 0 – 50 50 – 500 500 - 5000 Imported Plastic 0 – 50 50 – 500 500 - 5000 Imported Plastic co-extruded 0 – 50 50 – 500 500 - 5000 Local Imported Plastic (recycled) 0 – 50 50 – 500 500 - 5000 ☐Local ☐Imported Metal 0 – 50 50 – 500 500 - 5000 ☐Local ☐Imported Composites (eg. Paper/foil/plastic) 0 – 50 50 – 500 500 - 5000 ☐Local ☐Imported Glass 0 – 50 50 – 500 500 - 5000 ☐Local ☐Imported Ceramic 0 – 50 50 – 500 500 - 5000 ☐Local ☐Imported 0 – 50 50 – 500 500 - 5000 ☐Imported *Kilo tonnes per Question 4 (refer to p. 12) If you are a peak body/trade association, do you have the expertise to offer food safety advice on chemical migration from packaging into food (CMPF) to businesses within the packaging supply chain? No Yes Please expand on your response Question 5 (refer to p. 12) As a peak body/trade association, is there a need for access to further advice on CMPF? No
19 February 2015 [02-15] Administrative Assessment Report – Proposal P1036 Code Revision – Consequential & Corrective Amendments Description of Proposal: To update the P1025 – Code Revision version of the Code to account for variations to the existing Code made in M1010; A1092; A1096; P1022 and P1029 (subject to their publication) and variations to Standard 1.4.2 made by the APVMA from December 2014 and correct errors. Potentially affected Standards: 1.4.1, 1.4.2, 1.3.3, 1.5.3, 1.6.1, S18, S19, S20 and S27. Procedure: Minor The proposal will make consequential changes only and will not create or vary substantive rights or obligations. Estimated total hours: Maximum 100 Reasons why: Drafting exercise followed by external consultation. Estimated start work: Early February 2015 Decision Proposal prepared Date: 9 February 2015 Consultation & assessment timeframe Proposed length of public consultation period 3 weeks Proposed timeframe for assessment: Commence assessment (clock start) Early February 2015 Completion of assessment & preparation of food reg measure Late February 2015 Comment Early-Late March 2015 Board to complete approval Mid-May 2015 Notification to Forum Early June 2015 Anticipated gazettal if no review requested Mid-August 2015
(a) 120 mg per 100 mL for liquid food; or (b) 120 mg per 100 g for food. Reduced or Light/Lite The food contains at least 25% less sodium than in the same quantity of reference food. No added (a) the food contains no added sodium compound including no added salt; and (b) the ingredients of the food contain no added sodium compound including no added salt. Unsalted The food meets the conditions for a nutrition content claim about no added salt or sodium. ” [2.5] omitting from Schedule 1 “ Omega-3 fatty acids (a) the food meets the conditions for a nutrition content claim about omega fatty acids; and (b) the food contains no less than – (i) 200 mg acid per serving; or (ii) 30 mg eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid per serving; and (c) other than for fish or fish products with no added saturated fatty acids, the food contains – (i) as a proportion of the total fatty acid content, no more than 28% saturated fatty acids and trans fatty acids; or (ii) no more saturated fatty acids and trans fatty acids than 5 g per 100 g; and Good Source (a) the food contains no less than 60 mg eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid per serving; and (b) the food may contain less than 200 mg alpha-linolenic acid per serving. Increased (a) the food contains at least 25% more omega-3 fatty acids than in the same quantity of reference food; and (b) the reference food meets the general claim conditions for a nutrition content claim about omega-3 fatty acids. (d) the nutrition information panel indicates the type and amount of omega-3 fatty acids, that is, alpha-linolenic acid, docosahexaenoic acid or
“ Omega-3 fatty acids (a) The food meets the conditions for a nutrition content claim about omega fatty acids; and (b) the food contains no less than: (i) 200 mg acid per serving; or (ii) 30 mg eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid per serving; and (c) other than for fish or fish products with no added *saturated fatty acids, the food contains: (i) as a proportion of the total fatty acid content, no more than 28% saturated fatty acids and trans fatty acids; or (ii) no more saturated fatty acids and *trans fatty acids than 5 g per 100 g; and (d) the nutrition information panel indicates the type and amount of omega-3 fatty acids, that is, acid, docosahexaenoic acid or eicosapentaenoic acid, or a combination of the above. Good Source (a) The food contains no less than 60 mg total eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid/serving; and (b) the food may contain less than 200 mg alpha-linolenic acid/serving. Increased (a) The food contains at least 25% more omega-3 fatty acids than in the same amount of *reference food; and (b) the reference food meets the general claim conditions for a nutrition content claim about omega-3 fatty acids. ” and substituting “ Omega-3 fatty acids (a) The food the conditions for a nutrition content claim about omega fatty acids; and (b) the food contains no less than: (i) 200 mg alpha-linolenic acid per serving; or Good Source (a) The food contains no less than 60 mg total eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid/serving; and (b) the food may contain less than 200 mg acid/serving.
20 August 2015 [19–15] Administrative Assessment Report –Proposal P1040 Code Revision – Consequential & Corrective Amendments II Description of Proposal: To update the revised Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code to correct typographical and transcription errors. Potentially affected Standards: Standards 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 1.2.7, 1.2.8, 1.4.1, 1.4.2, 1.5.2, 2.4.2, 2.7.1, 2.7.4, 2.9.4, 2.9.6, S1—2, S2—2, S4—2, S4—5, S12—4, S15, S18—3, S26 and S29—21 of the revised Code. Procedure: Minor Reasons why: The proposal will correct typographical and transcription errors in the revised Code. The Proposal will not create or vary rights or obligations. Nor will it the Code’s legal effect. Estimated total hours: Maximum 100 hours Reasons why: Amendments will reflect current requirements. Provisional estimated start work: Late August 2015 Comments or Relevant Matters: Decision Proposal prepared Date: 14 August 2015 Consultation & assessment timeframe Proposed length of public consultation period: 4 weeks
Schedule 18 Section S18—3 (table) Item [21] replaces ‘tetraethylenepentamin’ with ‘tetraethylenepentamine’, to correct a typographical error. Schedule 26 Schedule Heading (Note 1) Item [22] replaces ‘1.1.1—10(3)(c) and (4)(g)’ with ‘1.1.1—10(5)(c) and (6)(g)’, to correct a referencing error. Section S26—3(4) (table) (a) Item [23] replaces ‘&’ with ‘and’ in entry 4(a), to correct a typographical error. (b) Item [23] deletes ‘food derived from’ in entry 4(b), to correct a typographical error. Schedule 29 Section S29—17 (Table heading) Item [24] omits the words ‘and intake amounts’ from the heading to the table in section No intake amounts are shown in the table. Section S29—21 (Notes) Item [24A] replaces the Notes with new Notes to correct typographical errors. That is, by inserting a full stop at the end of Note 1; replacing ‘1.1.2—14(3)(d)’ with ‘1.1.2—14(3)(c)’ in Note 3; and inserting a full stop at the end of Note 3.
2.1 Population groups assessed The Australian and New Zealand populations were broken down, within the limits of the nutrition surveys, into age groups to better characterise the risk associated with potential THC and CBD exposure in children, adolescents and adults. Children may be more likely to exceed a health based guidance value due to their large food consumption compared to their small body weight. Adolescents may also eat large quantities of foods per kilogram of body weight. Calculations were carried out for the following ages: 24 old (2011 NNPAS only) 514 years old (all nutrition surveys) 15 years and older (all nutrition surveys) A breakdown of population sample details can be found in Table 1. 1: Population sample details for THC and CBD dietary modelling for Australia and New Zealand Survey Population Age group (years) Respondents (count) Consumers (count) Consumers (%) Consumers Mean Body Weight (kg) Australia 2011 NNPAS 24 495 493 99% 17 514 1594 1589 99% 39 15 years and above 10064 9999 99% 77 New Zealand 2002 NZCNS 514 3275 3267 99% 40 New Zealand 2008 NZANS 15 years and above 4721 4672 99% 79 3 Assumptions and scenarios Proxy foods, market share and technical factors used in this assessment are based on those used for the assessment of A1039, except that dairy milks consumption was replaced with non-dairy beverages consumption as a more realistic proxy for hemp seed based non-dairy beverage consumption.
Salmonella phage preparation (S16 and FO1a) Reduce population of Salmonella species on the surface of raw meat and raw poultry meat during processing. GMP Sodium bromate Germination control in malting Limit of determination of bromate Schedule 19 – Maximum levels of contaminants and natural toxicants [52] Section S19—7(2) Omit ‘For this the substitute ‘For the table’ Schedule 21 – Extraneous residue limits [53] Note 1 Omit ‘1.1.1—10(5)’, substitute ‘1.1.1—10(6)’ Schedule 23 – Prohibited plants and fungi [54] Note 1 Omit ‘1.1.1—10(3)(a) and (4)(e)’, substitute ‘1.1.1—10(5)(a) and (6)(e)’ Schedule 24 – Restricted plants and [55] Note 1 Omit ‘1.1.1—10(3)(a) and (4)(e)’, substitute ‘1.1.1—10(5)(a) and (6)(e)’ Schedule 25 – Permitted novel foods [56] Note 1 Omit ‘1.1.1—10(3)(b) and (4)(f)’, substitute ‘1.1.1—10(5)(b) and (6)(f)’ Schedule 26 – Food produced using gene technology [57] Section S26—3(4) Omit (c) insect- and virus-protected potato lines RBMT15-101, SEM15-02 and substitute (c) insect- and potato lines RBMT15-101, SEMT15-02 and Schedule 27 – Microbiological limits in food [58] Section S27—4 Omit Powdered infant formula products * Cronobacter 30 0 not detected in 10g Salmonella 60 0 not detected in 25 g Powdered follow-on formula* Salmonella 60 0 not detected in 25 g substitute Powdered *infant formula, other than powdered *follow-on formula
6 January 2017 [01–17] Administrative Assessment Report – Proposal P1044 Plain English Allergen Labelling Brief Description of Proposal: To standardise the use of plain English terminology for allergen declarations on food labels. Potentially affected standards: 1.1.2, 1.2.3, 1.2.4, 2.2.3, Schedule 22 Procedure: Major Reasons why: The proposal involves allergen issues of such scientific complexity that it is necessary to adopt a major procedure. The change to the scope of allergen declaration labelling requirements is so significant that it is necessary to adopt a major procedure. Estimated hours: More than 2000 hours Reasons why: The allergen issues within the scope of this proposal are of a complex nature. Large scale social science and economic assessments are required to investigate these issues. Scientific safety assessment/advice is also required Provisional estimated work: Mid-December 2016 Decision Proposal prepared Date: 19 December 2016 Consultation & assessment timeframe Proposed length of public consultation periods: 1st call for submissions (6 weeks) 2nd call for submissions (6 weeks) Additional consultations: Food Allergy and Intolerance Scientific Advisory Group (FAISAG) Targeted consultations with industry and other stakeholder groups
Omit ‘lot’, substitute ‘*lot’ Standard 1.1.2 – Definitions used throughout the Code [4] Subsection 1.1.2—9(1) Omit the subsection, substitute (1) In this Code: nutrition content claim means a claim that: (a) is about: (i) the presence or absence of any of the following: (A) *biologically active substance; (B) *dietary fibre; (C) energy; (D) minerals; (E) potassium; (F) protein; (G) *carbohydrate; (H) *fat; (I) the components of any one of protein, carbohydrate or fat; (J) *salt; (K) sodium; (L) vitamins; or (ii) *glycaemic index or glycaemic load; and (b) does not refer to the presence or absence of alcohol; and (c) is not a *health claim. [5] Paragraph 1.1.2—11(2)(a) Note Omit ‘foods’ Standard 1.2.1 – Requirements to have labels or otherwise provide information [6] Subsection 1.2.1—9(6) (heading) Omit ‘either accompany or’ Standard 1.2.7 – Nutrition, health and related claims [7] Section 1.2.7—17 (heading) Omit the heading, substitute 1.2.7—17 Application or proposal to vary the table to section S4—5 taken to be a high level health claims variation [8] Subparagraph 1.2.7—18(1)(b)(i) Omit ‘high level health claim’, substitute ‘*high level health claim’ [9] Subparagraph 1.2.7—18(1)(b)(ii) Omit ‘general level health claim’, substitute ‘*general level health claim’ [10] Subsection 1.2.7—18(2) Omit ‘high level health claims table’, substitute ‘*high level health claims table’
1 Name This instrument is the Food Standards (Proposal – Code Revision (2018)) Variation. 2 Variation to standards in the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code The Schedule varies Standards in the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code. 3 Commencement The variation commences on the date of gazettal. SCHEDULE Standard 1.1.1 – Structure of the Code and general provisions [1] Subsection 1.1.1—2(2) Omit Schedule 22 Foods and classes of foods Note Applies in Australia only substitute Schedule 22 Foods and classes of foods Standard 1.1.2 – Definitions used throughout the Code [2] Subsection 1.1.2—2(3) (definition of permitted flavouring substance) Omit ‘2015 (edition 27)’, substitute ‘2018 (edition 28)’ [3] Subsection 1.1.2—9(1)(a)(i) Omit ‘*fat’, substitute ‘fat’ Standard 1.2.7 – Nutrition, health and related claims [4] Section 1.2.7—4 Omit ‘*nutrition content claim’, substitute ‘nutrition content claim’ Standard 1.2.8 – Nutrition information requirements [5] Paragraph 1.2.8—5(2)(b) Omit ‘small package’, substitute ‘*small package’ [6] Subsection 1.2.8—14(1) Omit ‘small package’, substitute ‘*small package’ Standard 1.2.10 – Information requirements – characterising ingredients and components of food [7] Paragraph 1.2.10—3(3)(c) Omit ‘small package’, substitute ‘*small package’ Standard 1.6.1 – Microbiological limits in food [8] Subparagraph 1.6.1—3(5)(a)(iii)(B) Omit ‘ISO substitute ‘ISO 16140.2:2016’
N 1.3 OSHA Safety requirements are met Meet 4 N 2.1 Reallocate direct flipping labor Decrease man-hours 4 N 2.2 Reallocate direct alignment labor Decrease man-hours 4 N 2.3 Reallocate direct labeling Decrease man-hours 4 N 2.4 Camera labeling system is low priority Control project scope 4 N 3.1 Maintain or decrease takt time Decrease processing time 4 N 3.2 All packages get scanned by the at desired belt speed Scan all packages 3 N 4.2 Keep allocation of floor space constant Fit within specified area 3 N 3.3 Control flow to scaling flow-rate variance) Minimize variance 3 N 4.1A Label is in proper orientation and position relative to the package Be aligned 3 N 4.1B All packages are centered in the beam Scan entire package 3
Municipality? What is the cost per borrower the SACCOS in Ilala Municipality? What is the level of delinquency rates among the SACCOS in Ilala Municipality? 1.5 Significance of the Findings of this study provides a light on the determinants of the financial sustainability of SACCOS, unveiling the various challenges impeding SACCOS’ financial sustainability, as well as providing tentative suggestion on appropriate strategies to adopt so as to ensure financial sustainability of SACCOS. The findings are useful in strengthening SACCOS in Tanzania. The findings also contribute to the existing literature on microfinance, financial sustainability and SACCOS’ sustainability in particular. 1.6 Scope of the Study This study determines the sustainability of SACCOS in Tanzania and focused on SACCOS in the Ilala Municipality in Dar es Salaam Tanzania only. This was due to insufficient time, funds and resource constraints; since covering a greater geographical area or more SACCOS could have require additional time, funds and other resources. 1.7 Organization of the Study This study is organized in five chapters. The first chapter presents the introduction. Furthermore, it is inclusive of background to the problem, statement of the problem, objectives of the study among other aspects. The second chapter presents the
Data and Calculations Interval # Position of Hole On Left (m) Distance Traveled In One Interval (m) Time at which vaverage = v(t) (s) Average Velocity In Interval (m/s) 0 – 1 1/60 1 – 2 3/60 2 – 3 5/60 3 – 4 7/60 4 – 5 9/60 5 – 6 11/60 6 – 7 13/60 7 – 8 15/60 8 – 9 17/60 9 – 10 19/60 10 – 11 of Acceleration From Graph ___________________ m/s2 Percent difference ___________________ LABORATORY 6 REPORT: SIMPLE MACHINES - PULLEYS
centripetal forces A and B, *Use g = 9.80 m/s2 Data & Calculations Table 2: Trial 1 2 3 Mass of Stopper, m (kg) Radius (m) Time for 25 Revolutions (s) Time for 1 Revolution (s) (m/s) A. Centripetal from Eq.1 (N) Hanging Mass, M (kg) B. Centripetal Force from Fc = Mg* (N) Percent difference between centripetal forces A and B, *Use g = 9.80 m/s2
Data For Part A: Data Table 1: Center of Mass of Weighted Meter Stick Mass of weighted meter stick: mstick ________________ kg Trial Mass 1 (kg) Distance 1 (m) Mass 2 (kg) Distance 2 (m) Mass 3 (kg) Distance 3 (m) 1 2 Torque equation: d1m1 + d2m2 + d3m3 + dstickmstick = 0. Trial 1: dstick ________________ m Position of center of mass ________________ m Trial 2: dstick ________________ m Position of center of mass ________________ m Center of mass from balancing on knife-edge ________________ m Calculations: Data For Part B:
LABORATORY 19 REPORT: THE COEFFICIENT OF LINEAR EXPANSION Ambient Temperature _________________ oC Data and Calculations Table: Type of Rod Aluminum Copper Steel Length of Rod at ambient temperature (m) Initial reading of micrometer (m) Final reading of micrometer (m) Tmax (oC) T (oC) L (m)  (oC-1) Known (oC-1) 0.000024 0.000017 0.000011 Percent difference
COMMENTS/CHANGES: MISC: N/A NOAA-15: There was relatively little change in the performance of the NOAA-15 bus & payload subsystems during the past week with the exception of the following: The spacecraft is performing nominally in mode with JFILT. Yaw errors are approximately +/- 1 degree (See Figure 1). NOAA-16: There was relatively little change in the performance of the NOAA-16 bus & payload subsystems during the past week with the exception of the following: N/A NOAA-18: There was relatively little change in the performance of the NOAA-18 bus & payload subsystems during the past week with the exception of the following: Nominal performance observed from NOAA-18 MIMU1. MIMU pressure has been dropping at a linear rate for 4 years (See Figures 2 & 3). MIMU1 pressure is now about 6.8PSI. The MIMU1 Z axis LIM reached 0.85 µamp on 24 July 2013 (13/205). Present value is 0.662 µamp. The automatic thruster unloading was deactivated on October 8th, and a switch to RGYRO ESTY (roll) was accomplished on October 9th with MIMU1 in use. The Y axis LIM is down to 62.9% since 20 September 2012 (12/264). NOAA-19: There was relatively little change in the performance of the NOAA-19 bus & payload subsystems during the past week with the exception of the following: NOAA-19 HIRS instrument filter wheel experienced a slight decrease in current 17 Nov 2013 (13/321) 13:00 UTC, which caused all IR radiometrics to decrease and the visible channel to increase slightly (See Figure 4). With this decrease in current, Channel 14 radiometrics are no longer saturated (See Figure 5). Nominal performance observed from NOAA-19’s (See Figure 6). There was relatively little change in the performance of the NOAA Instruments on MetOp-A spacecraft during the past week with the exception of the following: N/A MetOp-B: There was relatively little change in the performance of the NOAA Instruments on MetOp-B spacecraft during the past week with the exception of the following: N/A
[1]. Optics In Motion, Standard fast Steering Mirrors. Optics in Motion, LLC, n.d. Web. 18 Feb. 2011. [2]. Inman, Daniel J. Engineering Vibration . 3rd ed. N.p.: Prentice Hall, 2007. Print.
Project Number: 11565 ITT Andrew Bishop Electrical Engineer Matthew Manelis Mechanical Engineer Ben Geiger Electrical Engineer Nurkanat Suttibayev Industrial Engineer Katherine Hall Mechanical Engineer The primary goal of the project is to deliver a device that redirects beams with high precision, accuracy, and speed using a mirror. The customer, ITT Geospatial Systems, will use the product on satellites and other aircrafts for pointing lasers or tracking targets. The mirrors used in the system are interchangeable. However, a 3-inch round mirror is to be used primarily in the final assembly by ITT. This waffle mirror is specifically designed to be extremely light in weight and stable in structure, and is provided by the customer. This mirror rests in an elevated horizontal position by an aluminum dowel rod with a flexure portion that allows for slight movement of the mirror without material failure. Movement of the mirror is achieved by placing four current driven force actuators underneath the mirror. There are two axes of motion with a range of 5 degrees on each axis. Capacitive position sensors are each axis for proper feedback. Through proper design, assembly and testing, this lightweight mirror pointing assembly will meet as many of the required performance specifications as possible. FEA Finite Element Analysis FOS Factor of Safety FSM Fast Steering Mirror Light Detection and Ranging PID Proportional Integral Derivative PCB Printed Circuit Board RIT Rochester Institute of Technology Vdc Direct current voltage INTRODUCTION The prototype proposed is a beam steering device using a rapidly slewed mirror. At this time, a number of similar optical systems are currently available on the market by suppliers such as Optics in Motion and Newport. The FSMs are primarily much smaller in size (one inch mirror on average), are not designed to perform in a vacuum. They are also associated with an exorbitant cost vary on technical specifications. In fact, a system that closely matches this project’s target specifications is offered for $15,000. [1] The main intention of this project is to build a system that can compete with or outperform similar systems on the market while maintaining a budget of $2,000. The final model will have optimal functioning capacity and will meet preferably all of the high performance parameters specified by ITT. Aerospace applications include optical sensing of scattered light wherein a variety of parameters of interest can be measured from very far distances with this technology such as temperature, pressure, position, or vibration. Rapid motion of the mirror is
[1]. Optics In Motion, Standard fast Steering Mirrors. Optics in Motion, LLC, n.d. Web. 18 Feb. 2011. [2]. Inman, Daniel J. Engineering Vibration . 3rd ed. N.p.: Prentice Hall, 2007. Print.
Read Write Speak Understand none limited working knowledge proficient none limited working knowledge proficient none limited working knowledge proficient none limited working knowledge proficient none limited working knowledge proficient none limited working knowledge proficient none limited working knowledge proficient none limited working knowledge proficient none limited working knowledge proficient none limited working knowledge proficient none limited working knowledge proficient none limited working knowledge proficient none limited working knowledge proficient none limited working knowledge proficient none limited working knowledge proficient none limited working knowledge proficient none limited working knowledge proficient none limited working knowledge proficient none limited working knowledge proficient none limited working knowledge proficient none limited working knowledge proficient none limited working knowledge proficient none limited working knowledge proficient none limited working knowledge proficient none limited working knowledge proficient none limited working knowledge proficient none limited working knowledge proficient none limited working knowledge proficient 23. For General Service support level posts only, indicate if you have passed the following tests: UN/ASAT – Administrative Support Assessment Test (formerly known as clerical test): No Yes if “Yes”, date taken: UNDP/AFT – UNDP Accountancy and Finance Test: No Yes if “Yes”, date taken: 24. EDUCATION: Give full details - NB Please give exact titles of degrees in original language Degrees claimed in the job application (even if they are not a requirement for the post) must be completed at the time of the application. UNDP only recognizes degrees and diplomas from educational institutions that have been recognized or otherwise approved by competent authorities at the time that they were obtained. Degrees requiring little or no actual course work, degrees awarded for payment of fees only, and degrees granting substantial credits for “lifetime achievements” or “life/work experience” will normally not be recognized. Incomplete degrees are unacceptable to UNDP, regardless of whether they are associated with a recognized higher educational institution. A. List all educational institutions attended, including secondary school, and diplomas/degrees or equivalent qualifications obtained (highest level education first). Give the exact name of the institution and the title of degrees, diplomas, etc. (Please do not translate or indicate equivalent degrees). Name, place and country Attended from/to Mo/Year Mo. /Year Degrees / Diplomas obtained Main course of study In person or online/remote? B. Post-qualification training courses / learning activities Name, place and country Type Attended from/to Mo/Year Mo. /Year Certificates or Diplomas obtained In person or online/remote?
6.1.2 Materials intended for mass distribution must be: related to the New Brunswick curriculum or academic pursuits; well prepared, using appropriate language that is grammatically correct; age appropriate; and in the language of the school or, if intended for classroom use, in the language of instruction of the classroom 6.1.3 Materials of a religious nature are subject to the following process: A permission slip must be sent to parents asking if they wish their child to receive the religious material in question. The parent has the right to accept or decline. The practice of “negative billing”, or sending religious material home with the when a permission slip has not been returned to the school will not be allowed. If parents actively request the receipt of religious material, by signing a permission slip sent home from school, then the school may respond to those requests. Only children whose parents request the material by signing the slip will receive it. 6.1.4 Distribution of the following is always prohibited: Materials that could cause foreseeable harm to students or others. Materials that are of a partisan political nature. Materials of a discriminatory nature pertaining to race, colour, religion, national origin, ancestry, of origin, age, physical disability, mental disability, marital status, sexual orientation or sex. Materials that would be objectively considered: sexually inappropriate • libelous harmful to a person’s reputation indecent • violent • insulting harassment Materials which advertise any product or service inappropriate for minors such as the use of tobacco, alcohol or gambling. Materials intended for promotion, profit or other commercial purposes, such as: Club or Rec Sports Camps Private Clubs or Activities (drama, music, arts, etc.) Fee Charging community events Child care/Afterschool care programs Business or commercial promotions Events sponsored by religious affiliations/institutes Schools MUST comply with Professional Conduct – Conflict of Interest Schools MUST respect legislation and expectations when emailing any material to homes. Schools MAY NOT mass distribute physical flyers with students. Schools MAY post community notices on a designated community board or area, and must be clearly identified as a Community Notice Board or Area. Early Learning and Childcare Facilities link:
VICTORIAN CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL DIVISION LIST P1250/2017 TPA/46425 CATCHWORDS Section 77 of the Planning and Environment Act 1987; Monash Planning Scheme; General Residential Zone; Amended Design for a two storey apartment plus basement; design response to locational attributes; issues such as drainage. APPLICANT Rebony Pty Ltd Monash City Council VicRoads SUBJECT LAND 179 Clayton Road, Oakleigh East WHERE HELD Melbourne BEFORE Christina Fong, Member HEARING TYPE Hearing DATE OF HEARING 19 April 2018 DATE OF ORDER 11 May 2018 CITATION Rebony Pty Ltd v Monash CC [2018] VCAT 720 Pursuant to section 127 and clause 64 of Schedule 1 of the Victorian Civil & Administrative Tribunal Act 1998, the permit application is amended by substituting for the permit application plans, the following plans filed with the Tribunal: Prepared by: Select Architects Drawing numbers: TP01 to TP09 Dated: 02/1/18 In application P1250/2017 the decision of the responsible authority is set aside. In planning permit application TPA/46425 a permit is granted and directed to be issued for the land at 179 Clayton Road, Oakleigh East in accordance with the endorsed plans and the conditions set out in Appendix A. The permit allows:
Restructuring Date(s) Board Approved PDO Change ISR Ratings at Restructuring Amount Disbursed at Restructuring in US$, millions Reason for Restructuring & Key Changes Made DO IP September 5, 2014 No S S 6.36 Closing date extended from November 30, 2014 to January 10, 2016. The extension allowed IF to complete core program activities, including contracting of the new awardees from the fourth call for proposals as well as disbursing earlier approved funds to the existing awardees. Disbursement Profile
B. Key Dates Process Date Process Original Date Revised / Actual Date(s) Concept Review: 12/19/2011 Effectiveness: 06/03/2013 Appraisal: 07/05/2012 Restructuring(s): Approval: 03/19/2013 Midterm Review: Closing: 12/31/2013 12/31/2013 C. Ratings Summary C.1 Performance Rating by ICR Outcomes: Unsatisfactory Risk to Development Outcome: High Bank Performance: Moderately Unsatisfactory Borrower Performance: Unsatisfactory C.2 Detailed Ratings of Bank and Borrower Performance (by ICR) Bank Ratings Borrower Ratings Quality at Entry: Moderately Unsatisfactory Government: Not Applicable Quality of Supervision: Moderately Unsatisfactory Implementing Agency/Agencies: Not Applicable Overall Bank Performance: Moderately Unsatisfactory Overall Borrower Performance: Unsatisfactory C.3 Quality at Entry and Implementation Performance Indicators Implementation Performance Indicators QAG Assessments (if any) Rating: Potential Problem Program at any time (Yes/No): No Quality at (QEA): None Problem Program at any time (Yes/No): No Quality of Supervision (QSA): None DO rating before Closing/Inactive status: D. Sector and Theme Codes Original Actual Major Sector/Sector Information and Communications Technologies Telecommunications 100 100 Theme/Theme/Sub Theme Private Sector Development Business Enabling Environment 63 63
number of Internet service providers) Date achieved 03/19/2013 12/31/2013 12/31/2013 Comments (incl. % achievement) Not achieved. Indicator 2: Percentage of population with access to ICT services on Outer Islands (without coverage under the Baseline scenario) increases. (quantitative or Qualitative) Without ICT services (Program Document, para. 4.03) No data available. Date achieved 03/19/2013 12/31/2013 Comments (incl. % achievement) Not measurable. Indicator 3: Reduction in prices of core ICT services (mobile and fixed local and international calls; Internet services). Value (quantitative or Qualitative) Not defined No data available. Date achieved 03/19/2013 12/31/2013 Comments (incl. % achievement) Not measurable. (b) Intermediate Outcome Indicator(s) Indicator Baseline Original Target Values (from approval documents) Formally Revised Target Values Actual Value Achieved at Completion or Target Years Indicator 1: An open and competitive ICT market Value (quantitative or Qualitative) No. No. Date achieved 03/19/2013 12/31/2013 Comments (incl. % achievement) G. Ratings of Program Performance in ISRs
B-4 PBCS awareness Establish means to raise awareness on PBCS implementation in a particular region or airspace through workshops and distribution of information. Establish a planning team to work with ICAO and subject matter experts to develop relevant material. This manual Doc 10037 Doc 10038
Group E tasks – All stakeholders – post-implementation monitoring E-1 PBCS monitoring – On-going post-implementation data collection, monitoring, problem reporting and tracking, analysis and corrective action. When performance falls below specified levels, or problems are reported, operational judgment may be a consideration in determining appropriate actions. Chapter 5 Section 5.5 Appendix D Appendix E Doc 9937 Doc [PBHSM]
Task ID Task Descriptor Lead Complete Date Task Detail Reference(s) Status Group A tasks – State/region preparation A-1 AIP – Prescription of an RCP/RSP specification MAIS 2 ARAC CYCLES PRIOR Prescribe the appropriate RCP/RSP specification in the AIP (or equivalent publication). If applicable, common AIP language may be on a bilateral, multilateral or regional air navigation agreement. Chapter 3 To publish in Kenya AIP Applicable airspace: HKNA ATM operation: Application of 5-minute longitudinal separation minimum to authorized operators Communication: FANS1/A CPDLC –RCP 240 Surveillance: FANS 1/AADS-C –RSP 180 A-2 ANSP – PBCS policies, objectives supporting safety oversight Apirg pbcs project team – tbd Identify means to apply RCP/RSP specifications and compliance criteria for initial approval and continued compliance, including: a) ATS provision requirements, and requirements for ATS unit’s system and CSP/SSP service agreements, if applicable; b) flight plan requirements; and c) monitoring, alerting and reporting requirements. Chapter 4 Develop guidance materials for operators Provide guidance and materials for operators for filing of flight plans by operators to capture P code \Create Regional standardized processes for monitoring, alerting and reporting requirements.
Group E tasks – All stakeholders – post-implementation monitoring E-1 PBCS monitoring – May 2018 On-going post-implementation data collection, monitoring, problem reporting and tracking, analysis and corrective action. When performance falls below specified levels, or problems are reported, operational judgment may be a consideration in determining appropriate actions. Chapter 5 Section 5.5 Appendix D Appendix E Doc 9937 Doc [PBHSM] Data collection, reporting and analysis. Implement contingency procedures developed.
Index of Figures, Tables, and Boxes Figures 1. WSS MDG 2014 3 2. 5 3. (1915–2011) 6 4. 100 7 5. 2,475) 7 6. 8 7. 14 8. 15 9. PCGIR WSS 19 Tables 1. 2 2. (CRI) 1994 2013 4 3. 2010 US$ 9 4. 18 5. 22 6. 24 7. 26 8. 28 9. 32 10. WSS CCA 35 11. DRM, CCA WSS 41 Boxes REGULATORY INSTRUMENTS DESIGN STANDARDS OPERATION PROTOCOLS IDENTIFICATION REDUCTION PREPAREDNESS PROTECTION INSTRUMENTS RISK POLICY RISK RISK RISK RISK
ELEMENT OF ANALYSIS 2013 2014 Source of Verification Comments IDENTIFICATION (Threat, Exposure, and Vulnerability) Do WSS institutions have access to reliable and updated information about the risks present in the country? Environmental Observatory of the Ministry of Environment, formerly the National Service of Territorial Studies. Do WSS institutions have cadastral information systems and keep an updated registry of the location and characteristics of the main components of the WSS systems? The National and Sewerage Network Administration (ANDA) is surveying and digitizing the country’s cadastral information using geographic information systems (GIS). Do WSS institutions have mechanisms for monitoring the system to identify network and main components failures? ANDA monitors water quality through the call center as well as daily work schedules throughout the entire drinking water network at the national level. Have WSS institutions generated information on how events/emergencies have altered system functionality? PAHO/WHO (2003), “Vulnerability of the Drinking Water and Sanitation Systems in Rural Areas of El Salvador.” Have studies been carried out on the risk or (functional) vulnerability in the WSS sector? PAHO/WHO, UCA (2002), “Vulnerability Evaluation of the Supply System in El Morro Community.” Do workforce development plans in the WSS sector include opportunities for training in disaster risk management? REDUCTION Does the primary WSS service provider have a DRM unit or department? Risk Management Committee against Threats Do the primary WSS service provider’s operation and maintenance plans take into account aspects related to emergencies and risk management? No information was found Has funding been assigned for activities specifically related to DRM? No information was found Have concrete actions to reduce vulnerability in WSS been systems either planned or undertaken? Have threat and risk evaluations been included in the construction of new infrastructure? PREPAREDNESS Does the WSS sector have emergency/contingency plans linked to national/local emergency plans? ANDA – “Institutional Plan for Emergency and Disaster Response” (2004) and “Basic Guidelines for Regional Offices to Develop Plans for Emergency and Disaster Response” (2003). Have competent institutions been identified for WSS response, including an assessment of their respective strengths and capacities for response? Does the country have specific national coordination mechanisms for WSS institutions and actors? Are tools and procedures available for damage assessment and needs analysis (DANA) of WSS systems? ANDA (2004), “Damage Assessment and Needs Analysis – Core Equipment and Basic Formats.”
Table : Intercooler Compliance Specification Value Compliance Verification Air Temperature reduction >=50°F Thermal analysis Thermocouple measurement Manifold air temperature <=100°F Thermal analysis Thermocouple measurement The intercooler will be manufactured from purchased intercooler stock. There are three dimensions of the intercooler: thickness, width, and length . The induction stream into the engine passes through the plane made by the thickness and width dimension, and the cooling stream passes through the plane made by the length and width dimensions. Intercooler is only commercially available in a limited number of thicknesses. The intercooler width and thickness dimensions control the amount of warm, compressed flow that can pass through. The length of the intercooler controls the amount of cooling that occurs. Longer sections result in additional cooling. Turbocharger The charge that will be used is manufactured by Honeywell. It is a model GT06 which was originally designed for a small displacement 2 cylinder diesel engine. The relevant specifications for the turbocharger are listed below. Table 7: Turbocharger Compliance Specification Value Compliance Verification Peak Power Output 60 hp, 45 ft*lbs GT simulation DC Dynamometer measurement Peak efficiency Efficiency maps, GT Power simulation DC Dynamometer measurement: Fuel consumption vs. power Pressure to Actuate Wastegate 20 psi Purchased part Test stand measurement
Risk Assessment Table 9: Risk Items ID Risk Item Effect Cause Likelihood Severity Importance Action to Minimize Risk Owner 1 Poor Fuel Efficiency Low Fuel Economy Score Engine not tuned properly for endurance 1 3 3 Create separate fuel maps for each individual event Powertrain Engineer 2 High Car CG Reduced Cornering Ability Turbo location not optimized 1 2 2 Turbo placed within crash structure, allows for lowest placement possible according to rules Chassis Engineer 3 Insufficient Oil Flow Blown Turbo/Short Turbo Life Poor analysis of oil pressure source 2 3 6 Test oil pressure and flow of source to turbo implementation, follow manfr's recommendations on oil supply Powertrain Engineer 4 Thermal Management Chassis, engine, seat, or fuel over allowable temperature Unexpectedly high heat generation 2 1 2 Analyze chassis airflow and design for cooling, design in flexibility for additional cooling mechanisms Chassis Engineer 5 Engine Vibration Turbo Mount Failure Insufficient structural analysis 1 2 2 Design with vibration in mind. Verify components are constrained properly Structures Engineer 6 Thermal Expansion Stresses Additional stresses on mounting components Thermal CTE mismatch between exhaust components and mounting components 1 2 2 Design compliance into mounting system to relieve thermal expansion stresses, ie bellows engineer
S21 Password Protected yes/no - yes - Q7, E3 S22 Display modifiable specifications yes/no - yes - E3, E6 S23 Min number of stored # Increase 30000 - R1-7 S24 Minimum DAQ sample rate Samples/sec Increase 50 sensor capability Q1,3,4,5 S25 Storable alphanuemeric characters for serialization # Increase 20 - P1,P2 S26 Storable digits for operator ID # Increase 10 - R8 Engineering Specifications:
After continued discussion and consideration for space to allow the user to sit comfortably at the test stand, we decided to make the stand 12 inches wider to allow us to fit all of our electronics inside of one locker that can be bought and attached to the underside of the stand. This extra table space will also accommodate the label printer. After our detailed design review, we decided to move the free spce and the locker to the left side of the stand to better accomodate parts moving in and out of the stand. This is based on the location that the stand will be placed in the warehouse as well as the majority of people being right handed. Also, we discovered that we would need to consider any misalighnment that would be seen in the splines as E.P.S. Units are installed. To accomodate for this, we added hand wheels to allow for the operator to spin the servo shaft as well as the E.P.S. motor shaft by hand so the splines can be properly aligned. Torque Application: Anaheim Automation EMG-10:
quality; plastic septic tanks for flood-prone areas; and plastic rings for pit lining in remote mountainous areas. Government capacity to deliver sanitation component NTP3 has been increased By 2013, guidelines and tools have been developed for provincial level planning, programming, coordination and monitoring of sanitation Achieved Guideline for the Planning and Implementation of Sanitation Programs produced in 2013 and issued by VIHEMA to all 63 provinces for implementation. Associated training to nearly 100 key and senior health staff was provided in early 2014. Manuals and BCC and supply chain toolkits for Rural Sanitation Behavior Change and Market Strengthening 2015-20 developed and implemented in Hoa Binh Province. Approximately 1,100 health staff and motivators trained on implementation in Hoa Binh. Manual and toolkits also developed for Mekong Region. Training provided for more than 50 senior health staff and Women’s Union members in Mekong and WB6 project. Manual and toolkits developed for integration of human and animal waste management into the Second Northern Mountains Poverty Reduction Project (NMPRP-2) – Additional Financing By 2013, VIHEMA has adopted a capacity building plan based on a needs assessment. Achieved Sanitation Sector Capacity Assessment Report completed in 2014. Based on the findings a Capacity Building Strategy 2015-2020 developed and endorsed by VIHEMA in 2015. By June 2015, behavior change communication and supply chain development have been integrated in national at-scale capacity building program. Achieved Six training curricula developed in collaboration with MOH for implementation of the national capacity building strategy. Amongst other things they will be used in the new PforR project (21 provinces) from April 2016 onwards. By 2014, a performance benchmarking system is being developed in selected provinces, based on an improved sector M&E system. Not achieved Not done, to avoid duplication - similar work was due to be carried out under TA for the World Bank-supported PforR Program. Knowledge deepened on strengthening the enabling environment for rural sanitation and programmatic approaches for By 2013, equity analysis of rural sanitation access completed and widely disseminated Achieved Poverty and sanitation map developed and disseminated; see
19 Natasha Khalidi Alimony Fund confirmed 20 Sumood Dumeiri Sharia Court, Attorney General confirmed 21 Dr.Rafiq Abu Ayyash Head of the Faculty of Law at Al Quds University confirmed Non-MNA countries / organizations Nr. Name Affiliation/Country Contact details Notes 1 Lotta Teale Open Society Institute confirmed 2 Herman Schilperoort Aid Board Amsterdam / The Netherlands TBC 3 Richard Self-Represented Litigation Network / USA confirmed 4 Victor Zaharia Chairman Nationa Legal Aid Council / Moldova confirmed 5 Anželika Banevičienė Director of Kaunas Service of Legal Aid confirmed 6 Martin Gramatikov Tilburg Law School confirmed 7 Roman Romanov Rule of Law Director at the International Renaissance Foundation / Ukraine confirmed