zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Questions: Answer the following questions before turning in your lab. 1. What four karyotypes did you choose to complete? 2. How could you determine if your karyotype was male or female? 3. Complete the following table: Karyotype #1 Karyotype #2 Karyotype #3 Karyotype #4 Individual is a ________ Individual is a _______ Individual is a _______ Individual is a _______ Number of chromosomes: _______ Number of chromosomes: _______ Number of chromosomes: _______ Number of chromosomes: ___ What is the sex? _____ What is the sex? _____ What is the sex? _____ What is the sex? _____ Normal or Mutated (circle one) Normal or Mutated (circle one) Normal or Mutated (circle one) Normal or Mutated (circle one) If mutated, name the disorder below: ________________ If mutated, name the disorder below: _______________ If mutated, name the disorder below: _______________ If mutated, name the disorder below: _______________ After completing the karyotypes attached, go to the website at the end and do the activity. Give answers Normal karyotype #1 Normal karyotype #2 Set A Set B
Agricultural Research (EIAR) could be counted as one step ahead. Established by the financial support of the World Bank through Agricultural Research Training Program (ARTP) and Research and Capacity Building Program (RCBP) of the EARI, the NABL is officially inaugurated on September 2010. Its vision is to improve the agricultural livelihood of the nation through market competitive agricultural technologies. The three important pillars or missions of the NABC include enhancing agricultural research efficiency through application of biotechnology tools; improving production, productivity and quality of plants, animals and microbes and their products; and supporting the fulfillment of the Growth and Transformation Program (GTP) of the country at large. Farmer-to-Farmer (F2F) program in Ethiopia is operating in alignment with the USAID (FtF) Initiative of the Food Security Bureau of the US government and the Growth Program (AGP) of the Ethiopian government. ISSUE DESCRIPTION In pursuance to the recent establishment of the National Agricultural Biotechnology Research Program (NABRP) by the Ethiopian Agricultural Research Institute (EARI) of the Ethiopian government, the present programmatic activities of the NABRP strategically setup in three Under these three sub-programs, eight functional projects are also strategically set for operations. Most operations of these sub-programs and projects are being run in the National Agricultural Biotechnology Center (NABRC). The three Programs are Plant Biotechnology (operational since 2000), Animal Biotechnology (operational since 2006), and Microbial Biotechnology (operational since 2011). Under these programs, the list of eight current projects under operations also includes: Tissue culture protocol development and Mass propagation of disease free plants Molecular characterization of plants/Marker assisted selection(MAS) Diagnosis and indexing of diseases Assessment of the occurrence of GMO/ GMO detection Reproductive Biotechnology Rumen Biotechnology Microbial Starter Cultures
The below section describes the statutory requirements for the ETP report, including the need to display results for the most recent program year and the three preceding program years, average cost per participant, and disaggregated data by characteristics and employment barriers. Table 1: ETP Report Requirements by Specific Reporting Element Measure to be Reported by Program of Study Report Most Recent Program Year and Retain 3 Preceding Program Years Disaggregate by Entity Type Disaggregate by WIOA Participant Characteristics and Employment Barriers Total Number of WIOA Participants X X X Total Number of Individuals Exited X X Average Cost per Participant X X Data and Measures Required to Retain for Future Reporting The following data and measures will need to be reported based on the most recent program year and three preceding program years. Total Number of WIOA Participants Total Number of Individuals Exited Average Cost per Participant
OIT should encourage agencies to consider purchasing storage management tools from the group of products recommended according to the process described. OIT and GSD should provide a way for agencies to actively identify their purchase needs in this space and conduct a coordinated buying process to get the best price/value for participating agencies. Group recommendations on transition practice. How soon will the affected agencies be expected to move to the new model (if appropriate). What are the key considerations? Why this transition recommendation? Short description of the next steps related to this recommendation. Appendix A – Storage Resource Management Tool Matrix Criteria NetApp SANScreen Ionix ( 6.1) HP Storage Essentials IBM TPC Symantec Command Central Licensed by Fiber ports Array Type Depends on module Terabyte capacity Fiber ports, capacity Host OS Windows Server 2000 or 2003 Windows Server 2003 or 2008, , XP, Windows 7 Windows Server 2003 AIX, Linux, VMWare, Windows Server 2003 or 2008, , XP, Windows 7, z\OS Solaris, Windows Server 2000 or 2003 Host agent required? No Yes No, but functionality is limited Yes Optional. Symantec is adding functions
Notes Team was shown the topology map, but could not find it. Enables thin provisioning of DMX platforms. Integrates with HP Insight Manager Difficult to work through; interface is not intuitive. This is the only product offered by a non-storage vendor.
“Medications and the Elderly: A Clinical Challenge” Glen E. Farr, PharmD, University of Tennessee College of Pharmacy January 14, 2015 “Taking Care of Today and Planning for Tomorrow: Ombudsman Program and Legal Services” Lucinda Troyer, J.D. and Lynette Edwards, J.D., ETHRA February 12, 2015 “Conservatorships: What You Need to Know” William A. Reeves, J.D., Wise & Reeves, P.C. March 24, 2015 “Chronic Kidney Disease & Treatment Options” Rhonda McCammon, RN, Fresenius Medical Care April 28, 2015 “The Aging Brain and Alzheimer's Disease” Monica Crane, M.D., Cole Neuroscience Center The University of Tennessee Medical Center May 18, 2015 “QPR: Question, Persuade, Refer – Suicide Prevention” Anna Shugart, LCSW, Blount Memorial Hospital Freida Herron, LCSW, DSW, MBA, BalancePoint Counseling June 23, 2015 “Medicare: Latest Changes and Updates” Panel Discussion October 21, 2015 “East Tennessee Area Agency on Aging and Disability Services”
GENERAL INFORMATION DIGITAL STORIES PURPOSE The main purpose of a story (or narrative) is to entertain, gain and hold the listener’s attention. Stories can also teach or inform, or even change opinions. Stories sequence people/characters in time and place and set up problems that must be solved in some way. There are many kinds of stories. They can be imaginary or factual or a combination of both. Narratives include fairy stories, myths and legends, mysteries, science fiction, romances, horror stories, ballads, stories based in history, descriptions of real-life events and even the telling of personal experiences. Digital stories are stories that are told using computer-based or electronic mediums. Other stories are told live in person, or printed on paper – digital stories are recorded and played on a screen. They involve a combination of visual images and voiced narration, usually with a title slide at the beginning and brief credits at the end. Sometimes music or sound effects are added, although these can distract from the story being told if their purpose isn’t clear. MAKING A DIGITAL STORY A helpful introduction to making digital stories by teacher-librarian Julie Bain can be found here: TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Each entry must be submitted on a separate disc (DVD) with the entrant’s name and school clearly labelled. Format: WMV file for PCs and MOV file for Apples File size: 15mb (maximum) JUDGING CRITERIA For this competition, stories will be judged on the following criteria: Story: Whether the viewer feels engaged and drawn into the narrative throughout the entire story. Voice: Whether the volume and pace (rhythm and voice punctuation) of the narrator’s voice fits the story line and helps the audience really ‘get into’ the story. Images: Extent that chosen images work in a way that matches all the different parts of the story. The images should aim to communicate symbolism and/or metaphor. Words: Whether the story is told with exactly the right amount of detail throughout. It should not seem too short, or seem too long. Parameters: The story should be told in 2 – 3 minutes using a voiced narration. Storytellers should only use still images (no video). Image and audio sources should be acknolwledged at the end of the story. Happy story making and good luck!
CONTACT Pranav Raj, Sr. Engineer – Measurement Calibration and Diagnostics, Pranav.Raj@etas.com ECU – Electronics Control Unit BCU – Body Control unit TCU – Transmission Control Unit OBD – On Board Diagnostics ODX – Open Diagnostics exchange MC - Measurement and Calibration ADAS - Advanced Driver Assist Systems MDF – Measure Data Format FETK – Fast ETK INCA – Integrated Calibration and Acquisition System SSD – Solid State Drive MDA – Measure Data Analyzer PCI - Peripheral Component Interconnect ASAM – Association for Standardization of Automation and Measuring Systems OEM – Original Equipment Manufacturer USB – Universal Serial Bus CAN – Controller Area Network LIN – Local Interconnect Network GPS – Global Positioning System
I-NOTE NO. NAME DELIVERY ADDRESS 19 Tehsildar Etawah NIC Computer Center,21-22, NIC Complex,,Collectorate Compound,,Tehsil-Etawah Sadar,Dist-Etawah. 147 Bharthana Tehsil Office , BharthanaTehsil, Dist -Etawah. 148 Chakarnagar Tehsil Office , ChakarnagarTehsil, Dist 149 Jaswantnagar Tehsil Office , JaswantnagarTehsil, Dist 150 Saifai Tehsil Office , SaifaiTehsil, Dist -Etawah. 360 Bharthana Tehsil Office , BharthanaTehsil, Dist -Etawah. 361 Chakarnagar Tehsil Office , ChakarnagarTehsil, Dist 362 Jaswantnagar Tehsil Office , JaswantnagarTehsil, Dist 363 Saifai Tehsil Office , SaifaiTehsil, Dist -Etawah. 682 Mahewa BDO ,Mahewa Block, BharthanaTehsil, Dist -Etawah 683 Takha BDO ,Takha Block, BharthanaTehsil, Dist -Etawah 684 Barhpura BDO ,Barhpura Block, Etawah SadarTehsil, Dist -Etawah
499 Peachtree St, Atlanta (Across street from Emory Hospital – park in hospital parking deck) Program 12:00 – 12:30 Students arrive and sign in. (Family and guests are welcome.) 12:30 – 1:00 Refreshments available 1:00 – 1:15 Welcome, Introductions, Announcements 1:15 – 2:15 Student Performances 2:15 – 2:45 Desserts available 2:45 – 3:00 Winners announced. Photo ops. 3:00 – 3:30 Clean up and depart. ============================== We hope you can join us in 2019. For further information please contact the Shakespeare Committee Co-Chairs: Randy Brannen Diane Brannen or 912-484-3717 National ESU Org: http://www.esuus.org/esu/ Atlanta ESU Branch: http://www.esuus.org/atlanta/ The Competition: http://www.esuus.org/atlanta/about/shakespeare_competition/
b. Number of Orders having Violations which were referred to Enforcement Agency (1) To WHD (2) To OSHA (3) To Other 4. Number of Employers for whom Discontinuation of Service Proceeding were Initiated as a Result of a Field Check E - USES Complaint Systems 1. Total Complaints Received a. MSFW, ES-related b. MSFW, non-ES-related c. non-MSFW, ES-related d. non-MSFW, non-ES-related 2. Total Number of MSFW ES-related Complaints Referred a. To WHD b. To OSHA c. To Other 3. Total Number of non-MSFW ES-related Complaints Referred a. To WHD b. To OSHA c. To Other 4. Total Number of MSFW non-ES-related Complaints Referred a. To WHD b. To OSHA c. To Other 5. Total Number of MSFW ES-related Complaints Unresolved After 45 Days
Post Status P: T: A: Description of Duties Name and address of employer, contractor, Reason for leaving this employment Employment No: Title of post held Period in months From To Post Status P: T: A: Description of Duties Name and address of employer, contractor, Reason for leaving this employment Employment Record contd…….. Employment No: Title of post held
Managing Resources Please briefly describe (in no more than 300 words) your experience at managing resources which you consider would be relevant to the role of Director of Organisation Support and Development Specialist Knowledge and Expertise Please briefly outline (in no more than 300 words) any other relevant experience or expertise you have in relation to any of the following: Governance and Management of OSD Workforce Planning and Performance Management in OSD
Information Booklet Open Competition for the Appointment on 3-Year Fixed-Term Contract to the post of: Senior Administrative Assistant Apprenticeship/Traineeship QA Development, Support and Enhancement Ref: ETBI/ATU/03 [analogous to ETB Grade IV] Applications to Recruitment@TalbotPierce.com Closing Date for Applications 5.30 pm Wednesday, 31st January 2018 It is expected that interviews will take place the week of 5th Feb 2018
<000> employees here at <Company Name> participated in the month long campaign to help Mother Earth! Together we eliminated <000> miles driven, gained health benefits and improved our air quality. <000> pounds of carbon dioxide reduced <000> pounds of hydrocarbons reduced <000> pounds of carbon monoxide reduced I’m pleased to announce that <prize winner’s name> won <description of the prize> in our worksite campaign! Congratulations <prize winner’s name> and thanks again to everyone who participated!
ETC Toolkit Case Example Template QAA Enterprise Themes: (please highlight any relevant themes) Group: Learning Environment: Creativity and Innovation Opportunity recognition, creation and evaluation Decision making supported by critical analysis and judgement Implementation of ideas through leadership and management Reflection and Action Interpersonal Skills Communication and Strategy Skill Small group working in a team) Individual task Large Group Any Lecture theatre Presentation Space Carousel tables (small group working) Any Outside Special Case Example Title: Subject: Course: Year: Objective(s) or key message: Introduction : (short paragraph/ 2 -3 sentence) Activity:
Benzo(a)pyrene in PM10 Pollutants with Monitoring Objective **** (see annex E) KEY annual mean* …/P1Y annual mean** …/P1Y EXTRA daily mean* 50 percentile* hourly maximum* hourly minimum* …/1D …/P1Y-hr-per50 …/P1Y-hr-max …/P1Y-hr-min 50 percentile daily maximum daily minimum …/P1Y-per50 …/P1Y-day-max …/P1Y-day-min All other pollutants EXTRA annual mean* daily mean* 50 percentile* hourly maximum* hourly minimum* …/P1Y …/P1D …/P1Y-hr-per50 …/P1Y-hr-max …/P1Y-hr-min annual mean** 50 percentile daily maximum daily minimum …/P1Y …/P1Y-day-per50 …/P1Y-day-max …/P1Y-day-min NOTES: * If hourly values reported ** If daily values reported *** if values are not hourly or daily **** Component codelist is http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/aq/pollutant/[code] Editors note: Guidance from AQUILA on calculations is pending
exceeded the long term objective in one calendar year INT (Number of) hours in exceedance in a calendar year 180 µg/m3 ALT (Number of) hours in exceedance in a calendar year 240 µg/m3 TV AOT40 (calculation see Dir. 2008/50/EC Annex VII) (averaged over five years) 180000 (µg/m3).h May until July; averaged over 5 years 1.1.2010 LTO AOT40 (calculation see Dir. 2008/50/EC Annex VII) (calculation over 1 year) 6000 (µg/m3).h May until July CO Health LV (Number of) days when maximum daily 8-hour mean exceeded the limit value 10 mg/m3 (1) calendar year 1.1.2005 Benzene Health LV Annual average 5 µg/m3 calendar year 1.1.2010 Lead Health LV Annual average 0.5 µg/m3 1.1.2005 Health TV Annual average 5 ng/m3 Arsenic Health TV Annual average 6 ng/m3 Nickel Health TV Annual average 20 ng/m3 B(a)P Health TV Annual average 1 ng/m3 Annex B Margin of tolerance and upper/lower assessment thresholds Formula Protection target Env. Objective type Reporting Metric Objective Value MOT LAT UAT n
NO2 Health LV Hours in exceedance in a calendar year 200 µg/m3 100 µg/m3 140 µg/m3 LVMT LV Annual average 40 µg/m3 26 µg/m3 32 µg/m3 LVMT NOx Vegetation CL Annual average 30 µg/m3 19.5 µg/m3 24 µg/m3 PM10 Health LV Days in exceedance in a calendar year 50 µg/m3 25 µg/m3 35 µg/m3 LV Annual average 40 µg/m3 20 µg/m3 28 µg/m3 TV Annual average 25 µg/m3 LV 25 µg/m3 (20 µg/m3) 2 (2012); 1 (2013,2014); 0 (2015) 12 µg/m3 17 µg/m3 LVMT 27 (2012); 26 (2013,2014); 25 (2015) SO2 Health LV Hours in exceedance in a calendar year 350 µg/m3 Days in exceedance in a calendar year 125 µg/m3 50 µg/m3 75 µg/m3 Vegetation CL Annual average 20 µg/m3 Average value over the winter months (winter average), i.e. 1 October year x-1 to 31March year x 20 µg/m3 8 µg/m3 12 µg/m3 CO Health LV (Number of) days when maximum daily 8-hour mean exceeded the limit value (annual mean?) 10 mg/m3 .5*10 = 5 µg/m3 .7*10 = 7 µg/m3 Benzene Health LV Annual average 5 µg/m3 2 µg/m3 3.5 µg/m3 Lead Health LV Annual average 0.5 µg/m3 .25 µg/m3 0.35 µg/m3 Cadmium Health TV Annual average 5 ng/m3 2 ng/m3 3 ng/m3 Arsenic Health TV Annual average 6 ng/m3 2.4 ng/m3 3.6 ng/m3 Nickel Health TV Annual average 20 ng/m3 10 ng/m3 14 ng/m3 B(a)P Health TV Annual average 1 ng/m3 0.4 ng/m3 0.6 ng/m3
Title Alternative Title, if any Name of Research Scholar Enrolment Number/Library ID Name of Guide/Supervisor(s) 1. 2. 3. Name of Degree Level of Degree Department/Centre School Name of affiliated Institution for which JNU is granting the degree Date of Submission Subject Keywords 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Coverage (for time periods or spatial regions only) Language of the thesis File Format of thesis and accompanying material, if any (PDF, MPEG, etc.) Annexure-III Jawaharlal Nehru University Consent Form for Digital Archiving’
26. Blois SL, Poma R, Stalker, MJ, et al. A case of primary hypothyroidism causing central nervous system atherosclerosis in a dog. Can Vet J 2008;49:789-792. 27. Bloomfield, SM, MicKinney J, Smith L, et al. Reliability of S100B in predicting severity of central nervous system injury. Neurocrit Care 2007; 6:121-138. 28. Yuan, X and Bian, X. S100B protein and its clinical effect on craniocerebral injury. Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2008: 11(1):54-57. 29. Usui A, Kato K, Murase M, et al. Neural tissue-related proteins (NSE, G0-alpha, 280kDa calbindin-D, S100B and CK-BB) in serum and cerebrospinal fluid after cardiac arrest. J Neurol Sci 1994; 123:134-9. 30. Zhang J, Lazar MA. The mechanism of action of thyroid hormones. Ann Rev Physiol 2000; 62: 439-66. 31. Davis PJ, Leonard JL, Davis FB. Mechanisms of nongenomic actions of thyroid hormone. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology 2008;29:211-218. 32. Leonard JL, Farwell AP, Yen PM, et al. Differential expression of thyroid hormone receptor isoforms in neurons and astroglial cells. Endocrinology 1994; 135: 548-555. 33. Hurtt A, Smith M. Effects of iatrogenic blood contamination on results of cerebrospinal fluid analysis in clinically normal dogs and dogs with neurologic disease. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1997;211:866-867.
opportunities to improve. Describe how your quality control processes would be applied to each stage of this project. Project Timeline The Department and vendor tasks and responsibilities shall be completed according to the following schedule, which vendors must affirm. Table 5 Project Timeline January 1, 2015 1st Auditable Calendar Year Begins July 1, 2015 Contract Starts July – December 2015 Vendor Preliminary Work on Calendar Year 2015 Audit December 31, 2015 1st Auditable Calendar Year Ends April 15, 2016 Vendor’s Draft Audit Report for Calendar Year 2015 is Due after Consultation with ETF - See 2.3.6.1. April 30, 2016 Vendor’s Final (Draft) Audit Report for Calendar Year 2015 is Due. (“Draft” because Requires Board to Accept and Finalize the Report. See 2.3.6.2). Spring 2016 WDC Board Accepts & Finalizes Vendor’s Audit Report Calendar Years 2016, 2017, and 2018 Schedule Repeats Summer 2019 WDC Board Decides Whether to Renew for 1st Renewal Term, July 1, 2019 – June 30, 2021. July 1, 2019 Beginning of 1st Potential Renewal Period Summer 2021 WDC Board Decides Whether to Renew for 2nd Renewal Term, July 1, 2021 – June 30, 2023 July 1, 2021 Beginning of 2nd Potential Renewal Period July 1, 2023 Renewals Exhausted Financial Statements Audit Scope On behalf of the Deferred Compensation Board, the Department will be furnished with an annual report, audited by an independent certified public accountant (auditor), of the financial status of the WDC, disclosing value of WDC assets, liabilities, analysis of cash receipts and disbursements, and
Purchasing and Contracts Specialist – Entry – Additional Requirements, Education, Experience Bachelor's degree in Business or related field from an accredited college or university. Experience with procurement and/or contracts is required. Government procurement experience is strongly preferred, as is an understanding of health insurance and other employee benefit programs. Purchasing and Contracts Specialist – Intermediate – Additional Requirements, Education, Experience Bachelor's degree in Business or related field from an accredited college or university. Experience of at least one (1) year with procurement and/or contracts is required. Government procurement experience is strongly preferred, as is an understanding of health insurance and other employee benefit programs. Purchasing and Contracts Specialist – Advanced – Additional Requirements, Education, Experience Bachelor's degree in Business or related field from an accredited college or university. Experience of at least two (2) years with procurement and/or contracts is required. Government procurement experience is strongly preferred, as is an understanding of health insurance and other employee benefit programs. Description: Each of the audit positions listed below performs professional auditing duties requiring the knowledge and application of accounting and auditing theories and principles. The nature and complexity of these duties will be commensurate with the job. Duties/Skills Develop audit programs and procedures.
(Within transfer length) A1: >25 – speed 10/10 and pilot trains c d V & K Crossings Measure Response Comments Ineffective Bearers/Fasteners (In critical area) A6: 1 only – monitor A3: 2 consecutive – speed 40/40 and monitor A1: >2 consecutive - speed 10/10 and pilot trains Cracks in Cast Crossings A6: Monitor A4: Fully (not affecting running surface) – speed 60/65 and monitor A1: Fully (affecting running surface) – speed 10/10 and pilot trains Spacer Blocks A6: Broken/cracked - monitor Check Rail Bolts (Each Check Rail) A6: Loose – monitor Missing/Ineffective: <2 –A6: monitor except for 60/65 speed 25 tonne (A4), 40/40 speed 30 tonne (A3) axle load traffic areas 3 – A4: speed 60/65 except for 40/40 speed in 25/30 tonne (A3) axle load areas. >3 – A2: speed 20/20 and monitor Crossing Bolts Loose/Missing/Ineffective – record as defect and prioritise General Ok/Not Ok Comments Ok/Not Ok Comments Response assessment by competent person Drainage Drainage Drainage Drainage Drainage Drainage Ballast Ballast Ballast Ballast Ballast Ballast Alignment Alignment Alignment Alignment Alignment Alignment Additional Inspection Notes: Notes: * “Monitor” means at an appropriate increased frequency compared to the current inspection * Responses are default actions pending appropriate repair / renewal action * If the cause of a defect is known, and it is known that it will not deteriorate into an unsafe condition an alternate response to that shown is permitted with appropriate documentation Name of Inspector: Signature:
Name (As listed on passport) Given Name (Middle Name) Family Name Country of Residence Are you a citizen of your country of residence? Yes No Will you be living in your country during the AE E-Teacher course? Yes No Email Address (Please use your own email address.) Phone Number Preferred Term (Choose One) Winter 2017 (January 17, 2017 Start Date) Spring 2017 (April 04, 2017 Start Date)
ETEAMS Organizational Chart Leadership Jim Silliman Principal Investigator 361-825-3718 Cherie McCollough Co-Principal Investigator Research 361-825-3166 Joe Champion Co-Principal Investigator Program development 512-971-4088 Tonya Jeffery Co-Principal Investigator Implementation 361-825-2453 Pamela Wright Co-Principal Investigator Schanen Elementary School 361-878-2940 Senior Personnel Lee Smee STEM Faculty Field research development 361-825-3637 Matt Bowers University of Texas Qualitative Research 512-232-2120 Program Management Kim Moore Program Manager Coordination, Instructional Coaching 361-779-6123 Avery Scherer Graduate Assistant Field based research STEM Thursdays 502-551-1185 Christina Martinez Accounts Manager Purchases, budgeting, Data Management 361-739-3624 Principals Debra Aguilar Kostoryz Elementary School 361-878-2540 John Trevino Tom Browne Middle School 361-878-4270 Evaluators Jackie Stillisano Texas A&M University External Evaluation 979-845-8098 jstillisano@tamu.edu Anna Boriack Texas A&M University External Evaluation 717-572-5030 acwitt@.tamu.edu Hersh Waxman Texas A&M University External Evaluation (979) 862-1724
Paper Distribution of ETEA Admissions Entry Test for BS Programs 2018 S.NO GROUP SUBJECT PAPER BREAKUP 1 MEDICAL Physics, Chemistry, Zoology , Bio-tech, Pham D, D.V.M, Animal Science , Poultry Science, Microbiology, Bio Science, Fisheries, Wild Life Management, Agriculture, Environmental Science, Botany Physics = 20 Chemistry = 20 Biology = 20 English = 20 G.Know = 20 2 ENGINEERING Math, Electronics, Electrical Physics = 20 Chemistry = 20 Math’s = 20 English = 20 G.Know = 20 3 COMPUTER SCIENCE BSCS, (Computer Science) BSCS, (Software Engineering) Physics = 20 Computer = 20 Math’s = 20 English = 20 G.Know = 20 4 ART/COMMERCE BBA, Commerce , B.ED, English , Mass Communication Political Science, Public Administration, Management, Statistics Islamic Studies, LLB, HPE, Economics, ADE, ADB, Urdu, Sociology English = 30 G.Know/C.A = 20 Civics =10 Sports = 10 P.S/Isl = 30 5 M.ED B.ed B.ed = 60 English = 20 G.know = 20
Baton Rouge Community College Academic Affairs Master Syllabus Date Approved: 7 April 2016 Course Name: Registrar: 3-0-3 Lec-Lab-Credit: BRCC Course Rubric: State Common Course Rubric: 2016: Prior to 2016: CIP Code Lecture: Lab: Course: Contact Hrs/Wk: Contact Hrs/Wk: Contact Hrs/Term Credit hours: Credit hours: Credit Hours: Course Description: Prerequisites: Co-requisites: Suggested Enrollment Cap: Learning Outcomes: Upon successful completion of this course, the students will be able to: 1. 2. 3. 4. Assessment Measures: Assessment of all learning outcomes will be measured using the following methods: 1. 2. Information to be included on the Instructor’s Course Syllabi: Disability Statement: Baton Rouge Community College seeks to meet the needs of its students in many ways. See the Office of Disability Services to receive suggestions for disability statements that should be included in each syllabus. Grading: The College grading policy should be included in the course syllabus. Any special practices should also go here. This should include the instructor’s and/or the department’s policy for make-up work. For example in a speech course, “Speeches not
Getting from place to place Due to the volume of expected participants, there will be more walking during the site tour instead of loading and unloading everyone on the bus. We will be walking between some of the locations such as from 24 to 19 to 57 and then to SPTF. Participants are again reminded to wear sturdy, comfortable walking shoes. Steel-toed footwear is not required. Accommodations Participants will be encouraged to use the restroom at 450 before they board the bus since the only facilities in Area IV are the two CDM portable restrooms. However, there is a bathroom on the bus, too.
For example, for Scheme A they may be able to provide a service state wide; however, on Scheme B, they may only be able to provide a service in the Hunter region. Company details are updated by: Accessing ‘Scheme applications’ from the ‘Registered Company Name’ dropdown list. Selecting the ‘View/Modify’ option from the relevant scheme. Selecting the ‘Edit office details’ button under the Company Details heading. Updating the required fields. Selecting the ‘Save’ option. Updating company capabilities Over time the capabilities of a company may change. This can be as a result of the company growing, restructuring or downsizing, and of key personnel changing as a result. Companies wishing to add additional capabilities must have them assessed prior to them being added to their information. Additional company capabilities are added by: Accessing ‘Scheme applications’ from the ‘Registered Company Name’ dropdown list. Selecting the ‘View/Modify’ option from the relevant scheme. Selecting the ‘Edit application’ button under the scheme name on the right of page. Complete the relevant information for the new capability. Selecting the ‘Save’ option. The request will be reviewed and advice provided as to is success. Capabilities can only be removed from a company profile by contacting the NSW Procurement Service Centre. Updating company profile Company profile information includes key personnel, insurance information, financial information, experience and referee reports, WHS compliance information etc. and is submitted as part of the initial scheme application. Some of this information, such as insurance information will need to be updated annually while other information may need to be updated on an ad hoc basis as changes occur in the company. A review will be undertaken of updated company profile information prior to the information being made public. Company profile information is updated by: Accessing ‘Scheme applications’ from the ‘Registered Company Name’ dropdown list. Selecting the ‘View/Modify’ option from the relevant scheme. Selecting the ‘Edit company profile’ button next to the Company Profile heading on the lower left of the page. Updating the required fields. Selecting the ‘Submit update for review’ option. The request will be reviewed and advice provided as to is success.
Responding to an RFx In order to respond to an RFx and lodge a submission you must first ensure that you; Register as a Respondent to the RFx Download all RFx documentation The following instructions assume you have already completed these steps. Lodging a Submission The following steps will guide you through lodging a Submission. NOTE: There are limits on the acceptable file types, file size and number of documents per Submission, as explained below. Locate the RFx you wish to respond to using one of the methods indicated earlier. Click on the RFx to open the RFx details. Firstly, you will need to Register as a Respondent by clicking the button (if you have already done this move on the next step). Click on the Update or Lodge a New Submission button. You will be directed to the Update or Lodge a New Submission conditions page. Click on the Continue button to agree with the terms and conditions of the RFx process You will be navigated to the screen where you are able to upload your Submission. Before you start uploading documents and lodging your Submission, please locate the RFx name and check that you are lodging your Submission against the correct RFx. To upload a Submission document, click on the Browse button to locate your document. To upload additional documents, click on the Add More button. Repeat this process for all remaining documents, remembering there is a limit of 5 documents per Submission. You can make multiple submission against the RFx if you have more than 5 documents to upload. If you make a mistake and need to remove a document from your Submission, click on the Remove button next to the file you wish to remove. Click on the Update or Lodge a New Submission button to lodge your Submission. You may see an Upload in progress screen which indicates the Submission is being uploaded.
X. PRESENTING THE CONCLUDING REMARKS ON SECURITY The believer’s forgiveness and acceptance before God’s throne never changes because of Christ’s death and continued priestly ministry on our behalf (Rom. 5:9; Heb. 7:25). The believer’s fellowship with God does change (1 John 1:7) and therefore confession and forgiveness is needed (1 John 1:9) to regain our communion with God (Ps. 51:12) but not our salvation and justification (legal acceptance) before God’s throne (Jude 24). God faithfully looks upon the sacrifice of Jesus Christ (1 John 1:9; Ex. 12:13) and sees that Jesus paid the penalty of judgment (Isaiah 53:10) for every sin that we would commit throughout our Christian life. God therefore grants us pardon and forgiveness when we sin in our Christian life based upon the security of our pardon and justification that we already possess in Heaven. Christ’s sacrifice is finished forever (John 19:30), The believer is forgiven forever (1 John 2:12), Our High Priest has secured us forever (Heb. 7:25), God accepts and loves us forever (Rom. 8:33-39). The Christian can confess his sins repeatedly (1 John 1:9), The Father faithfully looks to Christ’s blood repeatedly (Heb. 7:25), Cleansing is applied to the Christian repeatedly (1 John 1:7, 9), Fellowship can be restored repeatedly (1 John 1:7).
Table 1: Logit Estimation of Domestic Terrorist Attacks, 2000-2008 All States Democracies Autocracies ELF .769 (1.30) 3.81** (1.72) -2.95 (2.94) ELF2 2.64*** (.518) 1.52** (.599) 5.52*** (1.17) ELF x Pop Density -.019 (.072) .067 (.082) -.172 (.169) Population Density .342*** (.071) .248*** (.082) .525*** (.169) ELF x GCP per capita -.275** (.131) -.540*** (.166) -.076 (.340) GCP per capita -.136 (.085) .065 (.103) -.332* (.180) Exclusion 1.31*** (.125) 1.51*** (.144) .784*** (.288) Dominance .740*** (.158) .961*** (.176) .178 (.454) % Mountainous .092*** (.009) .061*** (.010) .160*** (.019) Border Distance -.054*** (.015) -.066*** (.016) .052 (.039) Capital Distance -.012 (.033) .023 (.037) .021 (.073) Population .307*** (.066) .396*** (.077) .167 (.154) N(States) 348343(75) 254345(51) 93998(35) Log Likelihood -6193.79 -4708.50 -1430.09 Wald χ2 3887.97*** 3173.18*** 718.78***
Table 2: Predicted Probabilities Predicted Probabilities, Full Model Predicted Probabilities, Democracies Predicted Probabilities, Autocracies 5th percentile 95th percentile %∆ 5th percentile 95th percentile %∆ 5th percentile 95th percentile %∆ Population Density .0036 .076% 2011.11% .003 .059 1866.67% .0039 .191 4797.44% GCP per capita Exclusion .0064% .031% 384.38% .0043 .027 527.91% .027 .065 140.74% Dominance .015% .042% 180% .012 .038 216.67% % Mountainous .013% .029% 123.08% .011 .019 72.73% .025 .100 300% Border Distance .021% .017% -19.05% .016 .013 -18.75% Population .0029% .086% 2865.52% .0018 .095 5177.78%
E. FLARE STORAGE CONTAINER Physical condition is good / E1 Secured with an “S” lock / E2 Container is clean and tidy / E3 Instruction sheet is displayed inside / E4 Loose instruction sheet is inside / E5 F. EQUIPMENT FOR NIGHT OPERATIONS THRESHOLD LAMPS (Kerosene) – GREEN 4 No present / F1 Lamps are cleaned and fuelled / F2 Conditions of wicks are good / F3 FLARES (diesel or kerosene) 35 No present / F4 Cleaned and fuelled / F5 Condition of wicks is good / F6 FUEL Kerosene present. (Litres) F7 Diesel present. (Litres) F8 MATCHES Number of boxes present: F9 G. BIRD HAZARD MANAGEMENT Are birds considered to be a hazard to aircraft operation? / G1 H. COMMENTS/ACTION Comments on items answered NO NOTE If battery operated lights are provided in lieu of flares or lanterns, this form is to be amended accordingly, including records of when batteries are replaced. Certification by Inspector I certify that I have inspected the airstrip and certify that any defects found have been reported above. Signed:
Table 1 – 2017 Plan Year Pharmacy Benefit Design Table 2 – 2016 Enrollment Data (as of January 2016) Table 3 – Additional Background Information Table 4 – Format for Submission of Additional Clarification Questions Table 5 – Calendar of Events Table 6 – No Assumptions or Exceptions Allowed Table 7 – Evaluation Criteria Exhibit 1 – Pro Forma State of Wisconsin Contract (includes the Pro Forma Contract By Authorized Board and the Pro Forma State of Wisconsin Pharmacy Benefit Program Agreement) Exhibit 2 – Standard Terms and Conditions (DOA-3054) Exhibit 3 – Supplemental Standard Terms and Conditions for Procurement for Services (DOA-3681) Exhibit 4 – Department Terms and Conditions Appendix 1 – 834 Companion Guide Appendix 2 – Data Specifications – Pharmacy Appendix 3 – Data Specifications – Wellness Appendix 4 – Data Specifications – Medical Appendix 5 – Data Specifications – Dental Appendix 6 – State Employer Group Roster (ET-1404) Appendix 7 – Local Employer Group Roster (ET-1407) Appendix 8 – Health Insurance Fact Sheet (ET-8902) Appendix 9 – Pharmacy Benefit Program Fact Sheet (ET-8933) Appendix 10 – Data Warehouse and Business Intelligence Data Flow FORM A – Proposal Checklist FORM B – Mandatory Proposer Qualifications FORM C – Subcontractor Information
4:30 PM ADJOURNMENT 5:00 PM – 7:00 PM Supplier Support Committee Meeting – All suppliers are encouraged to attend. 20-JUN-2018 DAILY 9:00 AM Opening Comments (daily) Call to Order/Quorum Check Introductions ROGER BLOOMFIELD 9:15 AM Presentations Gold removal Subscriber Findings Outsource test lab survey results Metcal VIJAY KUMAR SUBSCRIBERS ROGER BLOOMFIELD METCAL 10:30 AM Breakout Sessions 7120/1 Swot analysis AC7120 vs. J-STD-001G and other slash sheets Update /11 handbook to use IEC paragraphs as source data Alternate – IPC 1601A Microsection – develop strategy for outsourced test labs ALL PARTICIPANTS 1:00 PM – 2:00 PM 2:00 PM Breakout Sessions (continued) ALL PARTICIPANTS 3:45 PM Breakout Session Report Out SUB-TEAM LEADS 4:30 PM ADJOURNMENT 5:00 PM – 7:00 PM NMC Planning & Ops Meeting – Task Group Chairs & Staff Engineers are required to attend. 21-JUN-2018 DAILY 9:00 am – 11:00 am Nadcap Management Council Meeting – All members are encouraged to attend this informative and important meeting. 11:15 AM Opening Comments (Daily) Call to Order/Quorum Check Introductions ROGER BLOOMFIELD 11:30 AM Breakout Sessions AC7119/5 or Handbooks AC7120 vs. J-STD-001G and other slash sheets Alternate – IPC 160A Results of Lab Survey and Possible New Outsource Checklist (Microsection) ALL PARTICIPANTS 1:00 PM – 2:00 PM 2:00 PM Checklist Revision Handbook Report Out SUB-TEAM LEADS 2:45 PM Voting Member Updates & Compliance with Voting Requirements STAFF ENGINEER 3:00 PM Various Report Outs AQS Liaison SSC Planning & Ops IPC Gilbert Shelby Doug Schueller ROGER BLOOOMFIELD Scott Meyer 4:00 PM New Business and Priority New Technologies – (spreadsheet) Review Priority List STAFF ENGINEER
- 6 – Schedule e-KMTC GUIDE 2. You can find schedule from menu bar. 1) Please click ‘Schedule’ and choose one of ‘Point to Point’, ‘Vessel’, ‘Port’ and ‘Long Term’. 2) If you choose ‘Point to Point’, please select country and port of origin and - 7 – Schedule e-KMTC GUIDE 3) If you choose ‘Vessel’, please search for vessel name and input voyage. - 8 – Schedule e-KMTC GUIDE 4) If you choose ‘Port’, please select country and port, and set period.
in the ‘B/L Inquiry’. - 23 – Export – B/L Inquiry e-KMTC GUIDE You can find B/L records for export in the ‘B/L Inquiry’ under ‘Export’. You can print off a B/L copy or invoice here. And you can amend B/L details by clicking a B/L number. 1. You can search for B/L records. 2. If you want to amend B/L details, please click a B/L number. Then, you will find the term and conditions. If you click ‘Confirm’, you are moving to the ‘B/L Inquiry;. - 24 – Export – B/L Inquiry e-KMTC GUIDE 3. After changing or updating B/L detail, please click ‘Save’. KMTC line will check your amendment request, and decide to
Acceptance of Previous Meeting Minutes Typo corrected in 4.0 (‘postponed’), dashes added to IPC specifications and added J-STD-001 to section 17.0. Motion made by Bill Cardinal and seconded by Junta Okutsu to approve the October 2015 minutes as amended. Motion passed. Membership Status Susan Frailey reviewed the voting status of the subscriber members. All members are in good standing. Richard Rumas made a motion and Roy Garside seconded to approve Vijay Kumar and Rachel Grinvalds as subscribing voting members. Motion passed. Donna Evans and Juan Vasquez (suppliers) have missed two consecutive ballots and will need to vote during the next ballot to maintain voting status. Succession Plan (as applicable) Not applicable at this time. Status of Ballots (as applicable) Susan Frailey reviewed results of ballots. AC7119/1 has been obsoleted; AC7120D, AC7120/1, AC7121, AC7121/1 have passed. Audit Observations Status (OP 1118) Scott Meyer stated there were no observations since the last meeting. Rolling Action Item List (RAIL) RAIL was reviewed and updated accordingly. Subscriber certification requirements matrix updated. ACTION ITEM: WebEx to be scheduled to discuss MSA proposal (RAIL 148). Roy Garside to establish meeting dates for PRI to set up meeting. (Due Date: 4-Mar-2016) – OPEN Task Group reviewed responses by members concerning the pros and cons of implementing Smart Checklist. Overall Task Group recommends going forward with the project. ACTION ITEM: Susan Frailey to gather more information from other task groups using smart checklists and eAuditNet staff to answer submitted TG questions. (Due Date: 20-Jun-2016) – OPEN Jeremy Needs gave a presentation on long-term parts storage and IEC62402:2007. Presentation included applicable standards, requirements, and recommendations. ACTION ITEM: All Task Group members to review if they have any requirements for long-term parts storage for June 2016 London meeting. (Due Date: 20-Jun-2016) & IPC – OPEN Topic postponed until June 2016 London meeting.
ESG Administration: In the entire consolidated application, no more than the amount listed in Column G of the 2018-2019 ETH Allocation Table may be requested for ESG Administration. HPP Administration: In the entire consolidated application, no more than ten percent of the HPP allocation may be requested for HPP Administration. Shelter and Outreach: The maximum amount of ESG that can be requested for Shelter and Outreach can be found in column I of the 2018-2019 ETH allocation Table. This amount is also equal to sixty percent of the total ESG Allocation. Rapid Re-Housing: Every consolidated application is required to have at least one Rapid project application. At least thirty percent of the Total ESG Allocation and thirty percent of the Total HPP Allocation must be requested for Rapid Re-Housing. These amounts can be found in columns J and K of the 2017-2018 ETH Allocation Table. This is the MINIMUM amount of funding that must be requested for Rapid Re-Housing. Applicants are strongly encouraged to request more than the minimum for Rapid Re-Housing. HMIS: In the entire consolidated application, no more than $10,000 can be requested for HMIS (including HMIS-equivalent databases). Rapid Re-Housing Housing Services and Housing Payments: In the entire consolidated application, at least fifty percent of the total Rapid Re-Housing funding request must be requested for Housing Payments. Homelessness Prevention Housing Services and Housing Payments: In the entire consolidated application, at least fifty percent of the total Homelessness Prevention funding request must be requested for Housing Payments. Maximums and Minimums in Each Project Application There are also minimums and maximums that each project application must abide by. Shelter & Outreach Projects: There is a $25,000 cap for each shelter and outreach project. Rapid Re-Housing & Homelessness Prevention Projects: There is no cap for the amount that may be spent on Homelessness Prevention or Rapid Re-Housing Programs. There is only a minimum (explained in the prior section). Activity Types and ETH Payment Request Forms
FULL –TIME EQUIVALENT (total hours / 2080 hours) PAID STAFF VOLUNTEERS Project Experience and Design Please briefly respond to the following. EXPERIENCE AND CAPACITY Provide brief description of the staff that will be assigned to this project. In the description talk about staffing availability, knowledge, and capacity. ADDITIONAL SCREENING REQUIREMENTS Does this project incorporate additional screening requirements to enter the shelter, such as income eligibility requirements, sobriety, background checks, and credit checks? If so, please describe the screening requirements, and explain why they are necessary. CASE MANAGEMENT AND HOMELESS AND MAINSTREAM SERVICES Describe the provision of case management and homeless and mainstream services to clients of this project (on site, off site, other agencies involved, etc.). STABLE HOUSING Describe all efforts the shelter takes to increase housing stability for clients.
COURSE TEXTBOOK LIST INFORMATION FACULTY INSTRUCTIONS STUDENT INSTRUCTIONS (Both Campuses) For each semester taught, faculty should complete and submit a new form for every course and return to Ethel Tomlinson in the Registrar’s Office. Forms are due by the first day of registration for a given term. Faculty should request Desk copies for Teaching Assistants on this form. It is up to the publishers’ discretion whether or not to provide desk copies for teaching assistants. Students may acquire textbooks by ordering online or directly from the publisher, which in some cases, the prices are more economical. Regardless of shopping/ordering method, students may check Cokesbury online for discount on text, or follow recommendations by your professor. COURSE INSTRUCTOR(S) Angela D. Sims COURSE NUMBER & SECTION ETH 301 AKV / AOV COURSE NAME Introduction to Christian Ethics COURSE SEMESTER &YEAR Fall 2018 DATE OF SUBMISSION 26 March 2018 REQUIRED TEXTBOOKS LIST BOOK TITLE and EDITION (include subtitle if applicable) AUTHOR(S) No. of PAGES to be read PUBLISHER and DATE 13-Digit ISBN (without dashes) LIST PRICE (estimate) DESK COPY 1 The Nicomachean Ethics Aristotle, translated by David Ross 170 Oxford University Press, 2016 9781420953640 8.00 2 Womanist Theological Ethics: A Reader Katie Cannon, et al 235 Westminster John Knox, 2011 9780664235376 35.00 3 Asian American Christian Ethics: Voices, Methods, Issues Grace Y. Kao and Ilsup Ahn, eds. 200 Baylor University Press, 2015 9781481301756 45.0 4 5 6 7 TOTAL Number of Pages to Be Read RECOMMENDED TEXTBOOKS LIST BOOK TITLE and EDITION (include subtitle if applicable) AUTHOR(S) No. of PAGES to be read PUBLISHER and DATE 13-Digit ISBN (without dashes) LIST PRICE (estimate) DESK COPY 1 Social Principles of The United Methodist Church 2017-2020 United Methodist Publishing House 70 United Methodist Publishing House, 2017 9781501835773 4.00 2 3 4
If funds received from units of local government, churches, foundations, United Way, or state government agencies will be used to match ESG funds, copies of funding award and/or commitment letters from these sources on their official letterhead and signed by their authorized official. If the value of donated volunteer hours, donations from businesses or individuals, client rent/boarding fees or client program service fees will be used to match ESG funds, the applicant organization must provide a letter on its official letterhead signed by its board chairperson describing the records which will be maintained on these match sources, the total amount of the match expected to be received and, in the case of volunteer hours, the number of hours expected to be donated. If the value of a donated building or any lease will be used to match ESG funds, provide documentation of the fair market value of the building or lease. If staff salaries are used, the source of the funds for these salaries should be identified by the applicant organization in a letter on its official letterhead with the exact amount of match available and signed by its board chairperson. For HPP funding, no documentation is required. Aggregate match accordingly: Other Non-ESG HUD Funds Other Federal Funds State Government Local Government Private Funds Other** Fees Program Income PROGRAM INCOME (24 CFR § 84.24 and § § 576.200 (f) Costs paid by program income) RULE Program income includes any amount of a security or utility deposit returned to the recipient or subrecipient. Program income must be used as match and documented correctly. No other program income is allowed to be derived from ESG, THP or HPP. Recipients and sub-recipients are prohibited from requiring or suggesting repayment of any service or financial assistance except for security and utility deposit.