Checklist No. Element/Characteristic Checklist No. Element/Characteristic 1 Policy Statement and Authority for System Safety Program Plan (Leadership Involvement and Commitment to Safety) 14 Facilities Equipment Inspections and Maintenance 2 System Safety Program Plan Goals and Objectives 15-A Maintenance Audits and Inspections: Signal Inspections 3 Overview of Leadership Structure 15-B Maintenance Audits and Inspections: Train Inspections 4 System Safety Program Plan Control and Update Procedure 15-C Equipment Maintenance Program: Signal Systems Including Maintenance and Vital Relays Maintenance 5 System Safety Program Plan Implementation, Activities, and Responsibilities 16 Training and Certification Program for Employees and Contractors 6 Hazard Management Process 17 Configuration Management and Control 7 System Modification 18 State, and Federal Requirements for Employee Safety Program 8 Safety and Security Certification 19 Hazardous Materials Programs 9 Safety Data Collection and Analysis 20 Drug and Alcohol Program 10 Accident/Incident Investigations 21 Procurement Process 11 Emergency Management Program 22 GO 172 Compliance 12 Internal Safety Audits 23 GO 175 Roadway Worker Protection 13-A Rules Compliance 24 Hours of Service: Controllers Maintainers 13-B Rules Compliance: Operation Safety Compliance Program Inspection 25 Contractor Safety Program 26 Guideway Maintenance 27 Traction Power System CHECKLIST
2016 CPUC SYSTEM SAFETY REVIEW CHECKLIST FOR SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT - AIRTRAIN Checklist No. 11 Date of Review 02, 2016 Department(s) AirTrain Administration Bombardier Transportation Holdings CPUC Reviewers/ Inspectors Person(s) Contacted Lee Mitchell, AirTrain Manager Michael Robert, AirTrain Assistant Manager Chris Hendrickson, HSE Professional Bombardier Transportation Tim Bollinger Operations & Maintenance Manager REFERENCE CRITERIA General Order 164-D AirTrain System Safety Program Plan (SSPP) AirTrain System Security Plan (SSP) SFO – APM Joint Exercise Rule Book Systems Operations, SFO Rulebook version 2016 ELEMENT/CHARACTERISTICS AND METHOD OF VERIFICATION Emergency Management Program Conduct the necessary interviews regarding AirTrain’s emergency planning, training, and drill/exercise program and review appropriate records prepared during the last year to: Solicit an overview of the process for AirTrain’s emergency planning, training, and drill/exercise program and specific examples of coordination with emergency response agencies on emergency planning and drill/exercises Verify a drill/exercise schedule has been created and followed and verify emergency responders and other outside agencies participation in AirTrain’s emergency planning. Determine when was the last drill/exercise performed and if post-drill action report developed? Was the post-drill action report used to make revisions to AirTrain’s Emergency Familiarization Response Plan and/or procedures? If so, have these
2016 CPUC SYSTEM SAFETY REVIEW CHECKLIST FOR SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT - AIRTRAIN Checklist No. 15 - A Subject Maintenance Audits and Inspections Signal Inspector Date of Review Aug 02, 2016 Departments Bombardier Transportation Holdings CPUC Reviewers/ Inspectors Shane Roberson Person(s) Contacted Chris Aman, BTH Engineering Manager Jeffery Douglas, BTH Field Service Engineer REFERENCE CRITERIA General Order 164-D AirTrain System Safety Program Plan (SSPP)
Change was circulated to the proper departments for implementation. All necessary parties or contract employees within or outside the agency were properly notified the change. RESULTS/COMMENTS Activities: CPUC Staff interviewed the AirTrain representative responsible for Configuration Management Process. The following information was provided and the appropriate records were also reviewed: AirTrain did not have any major configuration changes for the last 3 years. A list of minor configuration changes was provided. For a few of the minor changes AirTrain had As-built drawing and or specifications updated. Reviewed documents for FMI #SFOB-0106 & FMI #SFOB-0108. CPUC Staff randomly reviewed the minor configuration changes for the last 3 years. The TCA and FMI completed forms were also reviewed. The forms were completed and verified by a group of assigned reviewers from each department and finally the Quality Assurance Engineer signed and verified it before closeout. Reviewed AirTrain Monthly Summary Report dated June 2016. An Engineering Report section is provided in this summary report that provides TCA and FMI status update to overall AirTrain management. Monthly meetings discuss the status of each FMI and AirTrain management is involved in the meetings. Reviewed SFO Site Bulletin #097 effective date 12/09/2014 as a sample. Sign-up sheet was reviewed for all necessary parties within the agency were properly notified about the changes. Reviewed and discussed following documents: FMI SFOB-0106 ORS PC Software versions 5.2 FR1743 Date July 16, 2014 Closed March 25, 2015 FMI SFOB-0108 ORS PC RATP Software Release Date July 17, 2014 Closed October 17, 2014 FMI SFOB-0112 Vehicle Tire Pressure Monitoring System Released Feb 15, 2015 Open (as built drawing and specifications are completed with FMI) TCA ID SF-000273 ORS/MRS modulation R/F frequencies Closed March 2, 2016. (Test suspended due to RF contractor not available.) Findings: None. Recommendations: None.
2016 CPUC SYSTEM SAFETY REVIEW CHECKLIST FOR SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT - AIRTRAIN Checklist No. 23 Subject CPUC GO 175 – and Regulations Governing Roadway Worker Protection Provided by Rail Transit Agencies and Fixed Guideway Systems Date of Review Aug 04, 2016 Department(s) Bombardier Transportation Holdings CPUC Reviewers/ Inspectors McDonald Person(s) Contacted Marla McPherson SPC Site Director – Systems Division, BombardierChris Hendrickson, HSE Prfessional Bombardier TransportationTim Bollinger Operations & Maintenance Manager REFERENCE CRITERIA CPUC General Order 175 AirTrain System Safety Program Plan (SSPP) AirTrain Roadway Worker Protection Plan ELEMENT/CHARACTERISTICS AND METHOD OF VERIFICATION Part 1: General Topics Ask AirTrain to describe their program(s) aimed at ensuring roadway worker protection is in accordance with G.O. 175. Verify that the AirTrain has created a separate dedicated manual excerpting all necessary roadway worker safety procedures and from its rule book(s), and that this manual is freely available to its roadway workers when they are performing job functions. Verify that the AirTrain’s compliance testing program includes Roadway Worker
Protection (RWP) rules, and that these rules are tested to assess the degree of compliance, as well as changed when necessary to enhance compliance. Determine if these are included in the manual described in question 2. Determine whether AirTrain uses flag protection to provide roadway worker safety, and if so, determine whether it has established written flag protection procedures. Determine if these are included in the manual described in question 2. Review the AirTrain’s safety equipment requirements for staff. Verify that all employees who access the track zone are required to wear high visibility clothing (safety vests or jumpsuits). Verify that AirTrain requires anyone with access to the track zone (by request, easement, or other form of permission) to either complete the required RWP training, or be escorted by a RWP-trained employee. Part 2: Job Safety Briefings Verify, by collecting sign-in sheets, that AirTrain requires the employee in charge (EIC) of each roadway work site to provide a safety briefing prior to commencement of work within the right-of-way. Verify that the briefings are required to include the following aspects, when applicable: The general work plan The hazards involved, and the means by which safety will be provided. Considerations must include presence of roadway maintenance vehicles, adjacent tracks, and any need to widen track zone Personal protective equipment requirements Identification and location of key personnel, such as the watchperson and EIC. Flag use and placement A predetermined “place of safety,” where workers can move to within 15 seconds before rail vehicles moving at maximum speed authorized on that track can pass their previous location on the track. Considerations such as visibility, noise interference, and time required to get to the place of safety must be discussed. The means of communication amongst roadway workers to be used Acknowledgement that each employee understands the rules to be used If a watchperson is used, they and all other employees must receive a review of their duties – specifically, to provide a warning in compliance with the aforementioned 15-second rule, and to refrain from performing or assisting in any other type of work. Verify that it is AirTrain’s practice to conduct follow-up safety briefings, in cases where the crew or scope of work changes after initial safety briefing.