zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Recommendation 6: Ensure that domestic vessels are provided with long-term tenure on their licence fees in order to guarantee security. The activity expected in implementing this recommendation would be: 6.1 To initiate a system domestic licence for three to 5 years. Recommendation 7: Implement non target species bycatch management mitigation measures Activities expected in implementing this recommendation would be as follows: 7.1 Update stakeholder participatory risk assessments to evaluate the risks to bycatch species, if not already completed; 7.2 Ensure mitigation measures are developed for at risk species, especially the threatened shark species; 7.3 Adopt these measures into MSG licensing and control systems (MTCs, licence conditions, observer reporting). Recommendation 8: Fiscal incentives implemented and input and sales tax barriers removed. The activity expected in implementing this recommendation would be: 8.1 Removal of all import duties for imported supplies – fuel, engine parts, gear and bait, when not applied to date; 8.2 Allowing for established domestic companies to take advantage from tax incentives, as opposed to just providing incentives for foreign investors. Recommendation 9: Develop, in partnership with National Development Banks, Management Funds, catering for lending to domestically owned vessels. The activity expected in implementing this recommendation would be: 9.1 Bank lending management funds created, applying soft loans at around 6-8%, with support funding. FFA to work with the National Development Banks in providing a list of investment priorities which would be primarily market focussed, but could also include investments that reduce carbon emissions. Recommendation 10: Eliminating trade barriers (EU, USA, China) Activities expected in implementing this recommendation would be as follows: 10.1 Solomon Islands and Vanuatu signing up to IEPA 10.2 Promoting access to markets to US, and seeking Presidential concessions thereof 10.3 Lobbying China to remove the duty rate on imports of MSG based product into China Recommendation 11: Promoting investment in domestic vessel and plant upgrades to encourage ULT systems and compliance with HACCP Activities expected in implementing this recommendation would be as follows: Improving quality control standards HACCP standards with support funding made available for the domestic industry;
Book fair sold $3,400, within $20 of last year. SCRIP account balance is $34,220 H & S Account Balance is $15,630 H & S fundraising account balance is $30,331 We will be sending our first $5,000 donation to the church. This is usually done in November, February and May. Fundraising: Lourdes Starry Night, March 7th at Tanglewood Pavilion – Donation letters went out to parents and businesses. Total money from parent donations = $2925. January 12th – Information sent to parents and students January 16th – School Kick off rally for the raffles Silent auctions, raffles, wine pull, live auction Administrative/Staff Support: Field Trip funds – Paid $746 total for transportation for the following field trips – Kindergarten & 1st grade- Pride of the Wapsi 2nd grade-Wapsi Educational Center 4th & 5th grades – River Center for Literature Day Community Development: Trunk or Treat summary – good turnout, brought in about $1700 for the DC trip. 7th/8th graders completed their Premier Designs Jewelry sales for their trip. Only 9 students sold with a total of $3026 in sales. Looking into other fundraising options for the 7th & 8th graders. St. Nick’s workshop – first week of December.
RESEARCH 2014 Our efforts in 2014 led to incredible breakthroughs in vision science. Thanks to our donors, we supported Canadian scientists coast-to-coast with our largest research investment ever. See how our scientists are restoring hope and sight. How much did we invest? In 2014, we invested $2.2 million into research. This year, we made our largest ever investment in sight-saving research, allowing us to accelerate scientific momentum. 2012 2013 2014 $1.8 million $2.0 million $2.2 million Where did we invest? We funded 25 projects at hospitals and universities across Canada, in Victoria, Vancouver, Edmonton, Toronto, Ottawa, Montreal and St. John’s. Funding Composition Our emphasis on treatment-focused research continues to grow with exciting developments in these three interconnected project categories. Four ‘understanding vision’ projects. Thirteen ‘preserving vision’ projects. Eight ‘restoring sight’ projects. Research At Work Our funded scientists conducted 43 ground-breaking studies that were published in internationally renowned biomedical journals. These efforts also helped train 41 new vision scientists; building Canada’s capacity for future sight-saving research. For the first time, the Foundation supported four human clinical trials in 2014, bringing us closer to treatments than ever before. Our Partnerships The Foundation entered into four new partnerships in 2014, turning $193,607 of your donations into over $2 million in research funding. Our partners were:
DRAFT WELSH AMBULANCE SERVICES NHS TRUST MINUTES OF THE OPEN MEETING OF THE TRUST BOARD HELD ON 18 SEPTEMBER 2014 AT ST PETER’S CIVIC HALL 1 NOTT SQUARE, CARMARTHEN, DYFED, SA31 1PG MEMBERS PRESENT: Mick Giannasi Mike Collins Mike Coupe Emrys Davies Pam Hall Judith Hardisty Sara Jones James Mycroft Patsy Roseblade David Scott Jonathan Whelan Chairman of the Board Director of Service Delivery Director of Strategy, Planning and Performance Non Executive Director Non Executive Director Director of Workforce and Organisational Development (OD) Director of Quality and Nursing Non Executive Director Director of Finance and ICT Non Executive Director Interim Director of Medical and Clinical Services TRUST BOARD REPRESENTATIVES: Nigel Heal Michael Jose Nick Morgan Steve Owen Dawn Sharp Staff Side Representative (RCN) Staff Side Representative (UNISON) Staff Side Representative (GMB) Corporate Governance Officer Corporate Secretary APOLOGIES Moaiwa Bin Sufyan Nathan Holman Roger John John Morgan Bleddyn Roberts Elwyn Price Morris Martin Woodford Board Mentee Staff Side Representative (GMB) Staff Side Representative (UNITE) Non Executive Director and Vice Chair Staff Side Representative (UNITE) Chief Executive Non Executive Director OBSERVERS Donna Coleman Liam Crowther Sam Dentten Wynne Evans Michelle Evans Barbara Hartley Ray Hine Stuart Ide Ian Lewis CHC Representative NHSD – Senior Nurse Advisor CHC Representative CHC Representative Community First Responder CHC Representative CHC Representative Chief Ambulance Services Commissioner Press (Carmarthen Journal and South Wales Evening Post)
Muscle spasms Grinding or popping Arthritis SHOULDERS: Pain in joints (LEFT / RIGHT) Pain across shoulders Unable to raise arm above shoulder Unable to raise arm overhead Rotator cuff tear Muscle spasms Pinched nerve Tension in shoulders MID BACK: Pain between shoulder blades Sharp/stabbing pain Dull ache Muscle spasms Kidney area pain ARMS AND HANDS: Pain in hands (LEFT / RIGHT) Pain in elbows (LEFT / RIGHT) Numbness Tingling Hands cold Loss of grip strength Swollen joints in fingers Arthritis Wrist pain LOW BACK: Low back pain (LEFT / RIGHT) Upper lumbar pain Lower lumbar pain Tailbone pain Pain with cough/sneeze Pain with bowel movement Muscle spasm Arthritis Slipped disc Low back feels out of place HIPS, LEGS AND FEET: Pain in buttocks (LEFT / RIGHT) Pain in hip joint (LEFT / RIGHT) Pain down leg (LEFT / RIGHT) Knee pain (LEFT / RIGHT) Legs cramps Foot cramps Pins/needles sensation Numbness Swelling in legs/feet CHEST: Chest pain Breast pain Shortness of breath Rib pain Irregular heartbeat ABDOMEN: Nausea Vomiting Constipation Diarrhea Hemorrhoids Heartburn Poor digestion Gallbladder
Campus Improvement Plan 2013-2014 Final Review by Campus Committee on 10-15-13 Approved by Board of Trustees on 11-18-13 Sample #1 Full Consolidation This is not a complete Campus Improvement Plan. The purpose of this sample is to demonstrate how to show resources in the plan based on the type of consolidation selected.
Objective 1: By May 2015, 87% of all students and each student group, including Special Education students tested, will meet established standards on the state assessment. Summative Evaluation: 87% of all students pass all portions of the state tests, meet ARD expectations, and the Campus/District will meet Federal Standards. Activity/Strategy *Title 1 Schoolwide Component (#1-10) Person(s) Responsible Timeline Resources Evidence of Implementation Evidence of Impact Provide tutorial times after school twice weekly for students who are at risk of failure in core subject areas 9 Core subject teachers, Principal Begin end of 1st six weeks, review and adjust student groups each 6 weeks through May Tutors, space Federal Consolidation $20,000 Tutoring rosters, tutoring time sheets, lesson plans, student attendance Improved six weeks grades Reduced failure rate Teachers meet by grade level 1 hour weekly to review student data, identify students in need, and plan appropriate lessons and assessments to meet student needs 8 Core subject teachers, Principal Begin 1st week of school and continue the year Dedicated time, space No additional funds required Principal meets with planning teams the last week of each month to review progress and set goals for the next month Improved performance on concept specific aligned assessment Student success as evidenced by walkthrough documentation.
1) Complete secondary school or equivalent education: 2) Experience in budget preparation and control, general accounting in an automated environment normally acquired as a Junior Technician after five to seven years in the Agency or in a similar organization.: 3) Knowledge of information systems at end-user level with experience in using personal computers and software packages: PART 2 - SPECIFIC QUALIFICATION 1) Knowledge of the Agency's enterprise software (SAP), in particular Funds Management (FM), Financial Accounting (FI) and Controlling (CO) modules would be an asset: 2) Ability and willingness to work in a multi-functional organization: PART 3 - LANGUAGE QUALIFICATIONS 1) NATO's two official languages are English and French. The work of this post is mainly conducted in English, therefore fluency in that language is essential and working knowledge of French is desirable.: “I understand that the information provided by me above will be used in determining my qualifications for possible employment/career with NSPA. I realize that any false statement or omission even if unintended on my part, may lead to the cancellation of my application or may render a future appointment liable to termination.” NAME ___________________________ SIGNATURE ___________________________ DATE _____________________________ QUESTIONNAIRE RELATIF AUX EXIGENCES DU POSTE Le présent formulaire dûment rempli doit être envoyé par courrier électronique à: 1. Nom
Position Title: Firefighter Department: Operations Exemption Status: Non-Exempt Position Salary Range: $42,296 - $54,985 Hiring Rate: $42,296 Reports to: Lieutenant Date: July, 1 2017 General Statement of Duties: This position is responsible for performing tasks necessary to preserve the health and safety of the public in fire and non-fire situations, including basic life support, to patients who are victims of trauma and medical emergencies; fire suppression in both structure and wildland areas; and accidental releases of hazardous materials. The Firefighter safely operates emergency vehicles. Also performs routine and minor maintenance of apparatus and fire stations. This position assists in providing public education and fire prevention services to the community. Duties and the assigned schedule will be varied. Required Qualification: The ideal candidate will possess a high level of professionalism and problem solving ability; must have a high school diploma or equivalent. Certifications required at time of application: State of Colorado Firefighter I, State of Colorado Hazardous Materials Operations, and State of Colorado Emergency Medical Technician. Valid Candidate Physical Ability Test (CPAT) must be current as of August 3, 2017. Information on CPAT availability: July 13th or July 21st For complete job description visit . Application/Hiring Procedure: Submit a resume, cover letter, three letters of recommendation, employment application and copies of relevant certifications to Kristen Nash, Human Resources Director, Eagle River Fire Protection District, 90 Benchmark Road #101, PO Box 7980, Avon, CO 81620. Contact at ; (970) 748-4731. ERFPD application can be obtained at . Incomplete applications will not be considered. Testing Information: Written examination and panel interviews for successful candidates are scheduled for the second week in September. Application Deadline: August 3, 2017 at 4:00 p.m.
Sew the bunting together and string it around the hall for the big day. Could you enlist the help of older students or the school’s Craft Club? Or how about selling smaller lengths of bunting on a lunchtime stall? See the ‘Be a D&T Champion – Celebration bunting’ student card near the end of this document for more information to inspire you and your students. Going to deliver this in lesson time? Learning outcomes Possible curriculum links Students will: Design a piece of bunting inspired by a theme Explore and develop a range of design ideas Use a range of textile skills, such as appliqué, embroidery and embellishment Students will: Opportunities must also be provided to explore issues related to: Cultural Understanding Ethical Awareness Demonstrate creativity and initiative when developing ideas and following them through Respond to a personal design challenge in relation to their own lifestyle (Personal Understanding) Opportunities provided to explore issues related to mutual understanding Ideas for a plenary Choose from the following plenary activities to round off your design & technology fundraisers. Evaluating your fundraising Congratulate your students on the total they have raised and give them an opportunity to evaluate their fundraising activities. What happened? What went well? What could have gone better? What would you change if you were to run the event again?
Gilbert, R. (1988). The dynamics of inaction: Psychological factors inhibiting arms control activism. American Psychologist, 43, 755-764. Gilbert, R., & Christensen, A. (1988). The assessment of family alliances. In R.Prinz (Ed.), Advances in behavioral assessment of children and families. Vol.4, pp. 219-252).Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Gilbert, R., & Christensen, A. (1985). Observational assessment of martial and family interaction: Methodological considerations. In L. L’Abate (Ed.), The handbook of family psychology and therapy (pp. 961-988). Homewood, IL: Dorsey. Gilbert, R., Christensen, A., & Margolin, G. (1984). Patterns of alliances in non-distressed and mulit-problem families. Family Process, 23, 75-87. Gilbert, R. & Christensen, A. (1980). The evaluation and role of case study methodologies: A reply to Bernal. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 11, 339-341. Gilbert, R. & Christensen, A. (1980). Molar labeling interventions: Two case studies. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 11, 327-333. CREATIVE WORKS AND HONORS Gilbert, R., Hall, S., & Harvey, C. (2010). Loyola Marymount Virtual University, 3D Machinima and You Tube Video () Gilbert, R. (2007). The Recluse. (a novel). NOTE: I cite this unfinished work because developing the protagonist’s interest in virtual reality and virtual worlds led to the formation of the P.R.O.S.E. Project. Gilbert, R. (2005). The Third Condition: A Memoir of Freud’s Return. (a novel) Rockford, Ill.: Helm Publishing. Grammy Award – Songwriting – 1984. Inductee – National Academy of Songwriters – 1984
2011 Equity attributable to owners of the parent Reserves (in RMB million) Share capital Share premium Available- for-sale financial assets Shadow accounting adjustments Other capital reserves Surplus reserve funds General reserves Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations Retained profits Non- controlling interests Total equity As at 1 January 2011 7,644 67,644 (175) 1,066 107 6,689 395 51 28,609 4,853 116,883 Profit for the year - - - - - - - - 19,475 3,107 22,582 Other comprehensive income for the year - - (14,237) 1,607 53 - - 78 - 235 (12,264) Total comprehensive income for the year - - (14,237) 1,607 53 - - 78 19,475 3,342 10,318 Appropriations to surplus reserve funds - - - - - 293 - - (293) - - Dividend declared - - - - - - - - (4,245) - (4,245) Dividend paid to interests - - - - - - - - - (366) (366) Issue of capital 272 15,862 - - - - - - - - 16,134 Acquisitions of subsidiaries - - - - - - - - - 32,440 32,440 Others - - - - (28) - - - - 206 178 As at 31 December 2011 7,916 83,506 (14,412) 2,673 132 6,982 395 129 43,546 40,475 171,342
Secondary Education and Qualifications Name of school/college From To Qualifications gained with date Higher Education Name and address of university, college and/or university education department Dates Full or part-time Courses/subjects taken and passed Date of examination and qualifications obtained Age groups for which trained From To
Part 3: Equality and Diversity Monitoring This section will be separated from part 1 and part 2. Collection of equality information is solely for monitoring purposes to ensure that our policies and procedures are effective. We also collect this data in accordance with the general and specific public sector equality duties under the Equality Act 2010. Any data you enter onto this monitoring form will only be used for monitoring purposes and will not be used in assessing and or scoring your application or during the interview process. This information is kept fully confidential and access is strictly limited in accordance with the Data Protection Act. Ethnicity Workforce census code Please tick White WBRI British English Welsh Northern Irish Scottish WIRI Irish WIRT Traveller of Irish Heritage WROM Gypsy / Roma WOTH Any other White background Mixed MWBC White and Black Caribbean MWBA White and Black African MWAS White and Asian MOTH Any other Mixed background Asian or Asian British AIND Indian APKN Pakistani ABAN Bangladeshi CHNE Chinese AOTH Any other Asian background Black or Black British BCRB Black – Caribbean BAFR Black – African BOTH Any other Black background Other ethnic group ARAB Arab CHNE Chinese REFU Refused/Prefer Not to Say OOTH Any other ethnic group Sexual orientation Please tick Bi-sexual Gay Man Gay Woman Heterosexual Other Prefer not to say Gender Please tick Female Male Transgender Prefer not to say Personal relationship Please tick Single Living together Married Civil Partnership Prefer not to say Religion or belief Please tick No religion Christian (including Church of England, Catholic, Protestant and all other Christian denominations) Buddhist Hindu Jewish Muslim Sikh Any other religion (Write in) Prefer not to say Disability Do you consider that you have a disability? Please tick Yes - Please complete the grid below No Prefer not to say My disability is: Physical Impairment Sensory Impairment Mental Health Condition Learning Disability/ Difficulty Long standing illness Other Prefer not to say
Essential Questions (Feb 29-March 4) Who are Community Helpers? Goods and Services Letter of the Week - Uu Social Studies: A community helper is a person in our community who is employed for a wage and provides us with goods or a service. Daily Reminders CP – Center Parent – 9:50 – 10:50 Monday, February 29 CP- Suwanna Tuesday, March 1 CP- Katie Parks Election Day: Because our school is a polling place, no lunch visitors this day. Wednesday, March 2 CP- Shay Greenie Walk to School Day Thursday, March 3 CP- Shabnam STEAM Night: Art Show 5:30 to 7:30 and STEM activities for parent and child Friday, March 4 Media Center FROG NEWS: We are so grateful for the thoughtful ways you recognized all 3 of us during Teacher Appreciation Week! Namaste. We have many students who have already named their home address and phone number. Just a few more and we will order pizza for our class! Essential Questions: (March 7-11) Wants Vs. Needs Do I need that ? How do we use numbers? Letter of the Week - Kk Social Studies: We work so we can pay for things we want and need. Exceptional Child Week Monday, March 7 CP- Shay Greenie Tuesday, March 8 CP- Katie Parks Wednesday, March 9 CP- Craig Camasta Thursday, March 8 CP- Jeremy Rouse Friday, March 7 KID’S TOWN 9:00 to 10:00 Secret Kk Sharing Media Center DATES TO REMEMBER: Friday, March 11th – KIDS’ TOWN Our classroom will be the Pet Shop. Please send us an email if you would be able to come help from 8:45 to 10:00. You would see 170 adorable Kindergarteners out in Kid’s Town spending their earnings. Thank you for your donations…spread the word…we need stuffed animals ! Walk to School Day on March 2nd: Lace up your sneakers. We have been challenged by Mt. Bethel and Tritt Elementary Schools to see which school community will have the highest percentage of walkers!
Page 2 of 3 B. TOURNAMENT ROSTER (cont’d) Players to watch (include information such as statistical streaks, etc.): Interesting trivia about players (i.e., daughter of coach, X and Y are sisters, famous relatives, etc.) C. GAME-BY-GAME RESULTS OF THIS SEASON List the scores of each game played during the regular season and district tournament, including conference and invitational tournaments, etc. Indicate games played in a tournament with an asterisk (*). DO NOT LIST MATCHES FROM PRESEASON CLASSIC TOURNAMENTS OR PRESEASON JAMBOREES. Such preseason matches must not be counted on your win-loss record. Our overall win loss record thru the end of the district tournament is: wins losses Ties Regular Season Games Date Name of Opponent W/L/T Our Score Opp. Score District Tournament Games Date Name of Opponent W/L Our Score Opp. Score Page 3 of 3
18. Technology, CAD, RMS, Radio and MDC Expected Outcome: Clear and effective use of the radio systems, Emergency Data Computer (MDC), Records Management System (RMS) and CAD for quick, appropriate incident response and transport. Keeps radios at an audible level. Check Performance Rating Category Performance Description Not Applicable Does Not Meet* Fails to use MDC and AVRR; Needs help determining correct radio channel. Slow to respond to ECC. Fails to use appropriate radio etiquette. Receives negative feedback from ECC and others. Often turns the radio's volume too low or off. Meets Correctly uses radio and other communication equipment (ex. change talk groups, zones and use of EBS). Uses the State radio system as needed. Uses the MDC and AVRR standard functions correctly. Effectively uses the CAD, MDC, and RMS for information retrieval and recordation. Above Demonstrates understanding of advanced equipment functions and uses it to its fullest potential. Efficiently uses resources for ECC contact, hospital notification and consultation, record keeping, etc. Exceptional Ability to use technology enhances operational readiness and efficiency. Make recommendations to IT staff for improvements. Helps others improve their use of technology. Has an in-depth knowledge of the manual and computerized data collection and retrieval system of MCFRS. *Comments (Comments supporting a DNME rating are REQUIRED.) 19. Technology, Computer Expected Outcome: Effective use of automation resources such as e-mail and MCFRS On-Line for information and updates. Check Performance Rating Category Performance Description Not Applicable Does Not Meet* Violates County and MCFRS automation, Internet, intranet, and e-mail policies and procedures and directives; has large backlog of unread email. E-mail account is often over Meets Complies with County internet / intranet automation policy, checks email daily / minimal number of unread messages; is knowledgeable of current information. Above Can use other MCFRS & County software resources. Seeks to improve skills through IT training courses. Exceptional Helps others to use automation tools; possesses advanced knowledge of software used by MCFRS. May teach IT training courses. *Comments (Comments supporting a DNME rating are REQUIRED.)
5. Discuss with management or review MIS or other monitoring reports to determine the institution’s recent experience and trends for the Intrusions, both attempted and successful; Fraudulent transactions reported by customers; Customer complaint volumes and average time to resolution; and Frequency and duration of service disruptions. 6. Review audit and consultant reports, management’s responses, and tracking systems to identify issues for examination Possible sources include Internal and external audit reports and Attestation Report (e.g. SSAE-16) and other reviews for service providers, Security reviews/evaluations from internal risk review or consultants (includes and penetration testing), and Findings from GLBA security and control tests and annual GLBA reports to the board. 7. Review network schematic to the location of major e-banking components. Document the and the entity responsible for development, operation, and of each of the major system components. 8. Review the institution’s e-banking site(s) to gain a general
Security measures are deployed in a zoned and layered manner; Management appropriately trains employees regarding security and procedures; Perimeter if securities measures (e.g. exterior lighting, gates, fences, and video surveillance) are Doors and other entrances are with mechanical or electronic locks; Guards (armed or unarmed) are Also determine if they are trained, licensed, and to background checks; There are adequate physical access controls that only allow employees access to areas necessary to perform their job; Management requires picture ID badges to gain access to restricted areas. Determine whether more electronic access control devices exist or are necessary; Management adequately controls and supervises visitor access through the use of temporary badges or visitor escorts; Doors, windows, and other and exits are equipped with alarms that notify appropriate in the event of a breach and whether the institution uses internal video surveillance and recording; Personnel inventory, label, and equipment;
26. Supplemental Goal Expected Outcome: Performance of [INSERT TEXT] is satisfactory when [INSERT TEXT]. Check Performance Rating Category Performance Description Not Applicable Does Not Meet* [OPTIONAL DESCRIPTION] Meets [REQUIRED DESCRIPTION] Above [OPTIONAL DESCRIPTION] Exceptional [OPTIONAL DESCRIPTION] *Comments (Comments supporting a DNME rating are REQUIRED.) Count by rating category. Not applicable Does Not Meet Meets Above Exceptional Go to Page 1 and check the overall rating as indicated by the most frequently occurring rating category.
Air Quality Bureau P.O. Box 200901 Helena MT 59620-0901 (406) 444-3490 FIREFIGHTER TRAINING OPEN BURNING NOTIFICATION 1. General Information Name of Fire Department: Firefighter Open Burning Permit Number: Mailing Address: MT PO Box or Street Address City State Zip Code Contact Person: Telephone Number: FAX Number: Email Address: 2. Burn Site Information Physical Address: MT Street Address City State Zip Code Legal description of burn site: Section, Township, Range County Adjacent land use: Industrial, Residential, Agricultural/undeveloped, etc. d. Distance and direction to nearest residence or other sensitive areas (schools, hospitals, etc.): 3. Details of Proposed Burn Burn Date(s): Start Time: End Time: Types of Fuels and Materials to be Burned (check all that apply) Oil or Petroleum Products (specify) Insulated Wiring Tires, Asphalt Shingles, Tar Paper Automobile or Aircraft Bodies and Interiors Chemicals (specify) Standing or Demolished Structures Other (specify) Estimated Quantity of Fuel/Materials: Have all reasonably removable prohibited materials been removed? Yes No Have all asbestos containing materials been removed? Yes No Not Applicable Have adjacent landowners been notified of proposed burns? Yes No 4. Educational objective of the exercise: 5. Fire Department Representative Authorized Signature: Authorized Signature Printed Name Date FFOB_Notification_Form.docx 1 of 1 Revised: 10/01/2013
Working on the Work: Certified Personnel Evaluation System Teachers, Other Professionals, Principals, Assistant Principals, and District Level Personnel This tool may be used by district 50/50 committees to review the Certified Evaluation Plan (CEP) prior to submission to the local board of education. It is intended to assist with alignment to Kentucky statute and regulation and development of a fair and equitable personnel evaluation system. This document has been updated to reflect the enactment of 704 KAR 3:370 by the Kentucky General Assembly 2018. The regulation is no longer in draft or proposed status and such distinctions have been removed. Developing a CEP Included Well Defined Requirements: The CEP defines and provides the procedures, forms and accompanying documentation required for the evaluation of certified personnel below the level of superintendent and must: be developed by an evaluation committee composed of an equal number of teachers and administrators (50/50 committee) members, and their role, should be identified and listed in the CEP be aligned to the Kentucky Framework for Personnel Evaluation be reviewed and approved by the local board of education
The production of soap via the ester hydrolysis of the saponification reaction is a simple process that has had a significant impact for thousands of years. When heated in a basic solution, trigylcerides, like the ones found naturally in nutmeg and other plants, can easily be hydrolyzed into three fatty acid chains via simple nucleophilic acyl substitution. The amphiphilic nature of resulting soap allows it emulsify nonpolar lipids into water so they can easily be removed from surfaces via a simple water rinse. These soaps have practical applications in both the cleansing of various surfaces and the protection of materials. The amphiphilic qualities of fatty acid salts are important for interactions with many molecules and are relevant to many areas of study. In this experiment, one such soap product, sodium trimyristate, was effectively produced via a extraction and reaction process from the common spice nutmeg. The formation of the product was confirmed by melting point, IR and the product’s interactions with both olive oil and 1% ferrous chloride. References De Mattos, M.C.S.; and Nicodem, D.E. J. Chem. Educ., 2002, 79, 94-95. Phansteil IV, O.; Dueno, E; and Wang, Q.X. J. Chem. Educ., 1998, 75, 612-614. Socha, A.M.; and Sello, J.K. Org. Biomol. Chem., 2010, 8, 4753–4756. Frignani, A.; Grassi, V.; Zucchi, F; and Zanotto, F. Materials and Corrosion, 2011, 62, 995- 1002. Kuo, Y., Lin, S., and Wu, R. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1989, 37, 2310-2312.
experience with at least two in current jurisdiction agreement criteria are likely applicable. Three years is recommended as minimum qualifying experience Chief Officer letter of recommendation for Company Officer candidate Intended to ensure candidate has demonstrated requisite aptitude, ambition and commitment Required Course Work: Fire Officer 1 (NFPA 1021) Demonstrated knowledge of NFPA 1021 fire officer 1. This can be accomplished through self-directed IFSTA based study program or formal company officer classroom venues. Departmental verification of requisite Fire Officer 1 knowledge IFSAC certified, Pro Board certified or State specific Company Officer/Fire Officer 1 written test Certificate of completed written test NIMS Incident Command System (HSPD-5) ICS 300 NIMS certificate Incident Safety Officer (NFPA 1521) Demonstrate knowledge, skills, and ability of Incident Safety Officer This can be accomplished through formal FDSOA, National Fire Academy, or other locally accepted programs. Performance Evaluation Fire Officer 1 (NFPA 1021) IFSAC, Pro Board, or State issued Fire Officer 1 Task Book/Pamphlet Certificate upon completion Command and Control Demonstrated knowledge, skills and ability to perform incident command functions. This can be accomplished through “Blue Card”, ”ITAC”, or similar certification based program with academic and evaluated simulation components. Recommended Courses (Optional) Emergency Operations (National Fire Academy)NFA Strategy and Tactics for Initial Company Operations 2-day off campus NFA Decision Making for Initial Company Operations 2-day off campus Personal Management – Soft skills development NFA Leadership I for Fire and EMS – Strategies for Company 2-day off campus
CERTIFICATION EXAMINATION REQUEST All requests must be received 6 weeks prior to the exam start date. By submitting this request, Lead Evaluators and Hosting agencies agree to comply with all published State Fire Training policies & procedures. Upload request form to: Exam Name: FIRE FIGHTER I Certification Examination FY: Today's Date: Module Type Dates: Retake Dates: # of Students Advertise? Approval Code: Fire Fighter Written (Inc. time) Yes Skills Yes HazMat Written (Inc. time) Yes Skills Yes Wildland Written (Inc. time) Yes Skills Yes Agency/Evaluator Information: Hosting Agency: ARTP: Yes ALA: Yes Must be administered by an accredited ARTP/ALA facility Facility Name: Facility City: Facility Ph: Lead Evaluator: SFT ID# *Include a list of the Registered Skills Evaluators on page 2 Evaluator’s Email: (secure email address to receive random skills) Evaluator’s Phone Number: Contact Name: Phone Number: Contact’s Email or Website Address: (advertised address) Billing Information: Delivery Format Consecutive ($10 per unique student) OR Modular ($10 per unique student per each module) Bill To Agency: Attn: Mailing Address: SFT USE ONLY Type Registration Fee Consecutive ($10) OR Modular ($10-30) Initial Exam Rate * Numb. of Candidates Retakes $10 per retake Total Price Billing Code (5921-59210-142500-15) Written Total # of unique Candidates: _________ # of Candidates: _________ $ $ $ Skills Total # of unique Candidates: _________ $ $ $ Date Returned: All exam materials & exam results are now being collected via your online
During the program selection and planning process it is important to research and compare available programs to ensure that the selected program is the best fit for your community and existing resources. This tool is intended to help evaluate whether FFT is a good fit for your community and whether your community is ready to move forward with FFT implementation. The readiness and planning process involves five general steps. Steps 1 and 2 are covered in this document: STEP 1: Program selection: Is FFT a good fit for your community? STEP 2: Assess the investment of key stakeholders STEP 3: Plan for sustainability STEP 4: Prepare for implementation STEP 5: Develop a plan to assess program impact The EPISCenter, FFT Inc., and the OMHSAS Children’s Bureau are available to work with your community throughout the program selection, planning, and implementation process, including answering questions, reviewing plans, and participating in planning meetings. Contact information is provided at the end of this document. This Readiness Tool was developed as part of a collection of Evidence-based Intervention Program Readiness and Planning Tools, to help communities select programs that fit local needs and plan for sustainable implementation. The complete collection can be found at The following risk and protective factors have been identified and prioritized by your community: Risk Factors Protective Factors Family Negative and blaming communication patterns High family conflict Poor or hostile parenting skills Low social support Hopelessness Peer Poor peer relationships Family Positive parenting Supportive communication patterns Family cohesion and bonding Peer Positive peer relationships School Positive school-family relationship based
13 Signing of Exemption document (FFT/BCTS) FFT representative and TSM sign off document exempting BCTS from the requirements to produce a free growing stand as per section 45.2 of the FPPR Approval may range from one letter per TSL to an annual approval of all eligible blocks for the fiscal year. Sample letter 14 FFT Funding coding (BCTS) In Block Details screen in Cengea update Funding code from BCTS to Forests for Tomorrow and category from FTSBF to FFTITSL following approval. In Silviculture Activity Details screen in Cengea update Funding Source for each activity to Forests for Tomorrow and Project ID to 4055L15. This allows activity reports to be generated for the FFT AOP and 5 year Plan. Update FFT Eligibility status in FFT survey comments. 15 BCTS submits FFT AOP Update BCTS updates the annual operating plan to include all approved blocks. Once AOP is approved funding is secured. 16 File documentation (BCTS) All eligibility surveys filed to opening files Original signed letters (and copies for multiple opening letters) filed on legal side of opening files. Copy of each letter to TSL file. Digital scanned copy to attached in Block details screen in Cengea ( If multiple blks. attach to first blk. in the navigator tree )
Name _________________________________________________ Period ________ Date ____________ Unit 8 Expressions Test Review #2 Evaluate each expression using the information provided. 1. −3x2 + 4 when x = 6 2. −12 + 4(x3 ÷ 8) when x = −2 3. + 6 + n2 when n = −9 4. m2 – 48 ÷ 6 × 2 when m = 7 5. The square of the sum of 6 and 3 6. Triple the difference of x and 12, when x = 5 Write and evaluate each expression. 7 . Isabella has three more than twice as many crayons as Abby. a. Write an algebraic expression to represent the number of crayons that Isabella has. b. Evaluate the expression when Abby has 15 crayons. 8. The skating rink charges $100 to reserve the place and then $5 per person. a. Write an expression to represent the cost for any number of people. Use n = the number of people. b. Evaluate the expression for n = 24 people. 9. The small square below has a side length of a. The large square has a side length of 3a. a. Write an expression to represent the perimeter of the small square. b. Write an expression to represent the area of the small square. c. Write an expression to represent the perimeter of the large square. d. Write an expression to represent the area of the large square. 10. Draw a rectangle that has an area of 16a2 and a perimeter of 16a. - Label the length and width of your rectangle on the drawing. - Prove (in words and/or numbers) that the area is 16a2 and the perimeter is 16a.
Table 1. Average Duration and Number of Total Sessions for Completed Cases duration of FFT in weeks 39.3 42.0 41.8 37.1 34.5 total number of sessions 14.6 14.5 14.6 14.4 14.3 n for completed cases 435 684 909 1,233 1,149 Aug 2008 – July 2009 Aug 2009 – July 2010 Aug 2010 – July 2011 Aug 2011– July 2012 Aug 2012– July 2013 Graph 2. Percent Change in YOQ Scores by Informant n for YOQ-PF1 219 416 544 792 827 n for YOQ-PF2 50 81 107 94 107 n for YOQ-SR 260 466 618 885 921 Aug 2008 – July 2009 Aug 2009 – July 2010 Aug 2010 – July 2011 Aug 2011– July 2012 Aug 2012– Jan 2013
The percent of clients showing reliable change reflects those with an amount of change on an outcome measure from pre-FFT to post-FFT that meets or exceeds the value of the Reliable Change Index (RCI). RCI, as calculated using the Jacobson-Truax (1991) method, is the amount of change that can be considered reliable based on the difference from pre- to post-, taking the variability of the pre-treatment group and measurement error into consideration. It reflects an amount of change that is not likely to be due to measurement error (p<.05) [see Wise, E.A. (2004). Methods for Analyzing Psychotherapy Outcomes: A Review of Clinical Significance, Reliable Change, and Recommendations for Future Directions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82(1), 50-59]. The percent of clients with positive change, no change, and negative change are reported in Table 5; and, Graph 2 of the program report presents reliable change in these three categories for each informant. Appendix B. Phase III Sites Aviva Children’s Institute, Inc – Team 1 Children’s Institute, Inc – Team 2 Comprehensive Youth Services – Team 1 EMQ-Families First Family Service Agency of San Francisco Humboldt County Mental Health – Children, Youth and Family Services Imperial County Kern County Mental Health – Children’s System Los Angeles Child Guidance Clinic Los Angeles County Probation, Team 2 Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health – Long Beach Child and Adolescence Program Marin County – Juvenile Probation Napa County Probation Penny Lane Centers, Team 1 Penny Lane Centers, Team 3 Placer County Children’s System of Care Sacramento RBS Group Home Project - Martin’s Achievement Place, Quality Group Home, and Sacramento Children’s Receiving Home San Bernardino County – Integrated New Family Opportunities Shields for Families, Team 1 Shields for Families, Team 2 Shields for Families, Team 3 Shields for Families, Team 4 Shields for Families, Team 5 Stanford Youth Solutions Star View Community Services, Team 1 Star View Community Services, Team 2 Sutter-Yuba Mental Health Yolo County – CommuniCare Health Centers
Extremely Likely and Likely 109 85.8 +0.2 Extremely Likely 54 42.5 -6 Likely 55 43.3 +6.2 Neither likely nor unlikely 11 8.7 +0.8 Unlikely 3 2.4 -0.1 Extremely unlikely 2 1.6 -0.4 Don't know 2 1.6 -0.4 Trend Graph Free Text Comments Positive Total Negative Total Sub Codes Description Sub Code Positive Total Negative Total Count % Count % Count % Count % Relationship Themes 21 22 1 Emotional Support 3 6 Reasuurnig 1.1 2 4 Caring 1.2 1 2 3 Quality of staff /professionalism 18 36 Knowlegable 3.1 1 2 Good/Excellent Staff 3.2 1 2 Friendly staff 3.3 5 10 Understanding 3.4 1 2 Helpful staff 3.5 7 14 Attitude 3.6 3 6 Transactional Themes 29 58 13 100 6 Timeliness and access to care 5 10 8 61.6 Pick Up Times 6.5 5 10 5 38.5 Collection times post appointment 6.6 3 23.1 8. Facilities 1 2 1 7.7 Transport met specific needs 8.2 1 2 1 7.7 9 Co-ordination and integration of care 1 7.7 Co-ordination of transport resources 9.3 1 7.7 11 Physical comfort compassion 1 2 1 7.7 Safety 11.1 1 2 Comfort 11.3 1 7.7 12 Quality of Care / Service 19 38 good /excellent service 12.1 17 34 Helpful 12.2 2 4 13 General / Other 3 6 General 13.1 3 6 14 Triage Process 2 15.4 Questioning process 14.1 2 15.4 Totals 50 79.4 13 20.6 50 13
Local Government Victoria, DELWP – Project administration Municipal Association of Victoria – Project support Governance The project partners will meet regularly throughout the life of the project to report on project status, identify potential issues and project evaluation. Acknowledgement Successful applicants are expected to acknowledge the Victorian Government’s support and promotional guidelines will form part of the funding agreement. Successful applicants must liaise with the departmental program area to coordinate any public events or announcements related to the project. Successful applicants agree to share learnings and resources produced with project funding through the MAV Promising Practice Portal. Application checklist I agree to the deliverables and conditions of funding I have confirmed my project with council executive and have submitted evidence of support I have reviewed the Victorian Common Funding Agreement Standard Terms and Conditions I have the appropriate delegation to apply I have identified all funding sources I have prepared an Investment Logic Map Successful grantees will be required to accept the following conditions Acceptance of conditions Part Acceptance Statement of departures and reasons Service information and requirements Yes / No Specifications and evaluation Yes / No Submission Yes / No Service Agreement Yes / No Participate in the development of the statewide evaluation framework and contribute local project data accordingly Yes / No Work with the Municipal Association of Victoria to build capacity in this project including attendance and engagement with community of practice and development of individual evaluation frameworks. Yes/ No
Kevin has recently been the focus of multiple intrusive public records requests, including from “Food Babe” Vani Hari, after he answered questions on a corporate-funded website called GMOanswers.com about the use of molecular science to improve crops. What we’ve previously learned from episodes such as Climategate is that scientists’ emails can be cherry-picked and used out of context to confuse the public about issues around which there is solid scientific consensus.
But this is the way the land-grant university system is supposed to work. Part of our mission is to partner with others -- whether it’s corporations, government agencies, or the FFVA – to discover, test, and commercialize inventions. It’s also our mission to share science and innovation broadly with the public. It’s good to be in a room where people actually understand that. As a publicly funded university, we value transparency. As a result of the activists’ request, we released in writing what Folta has consistently disclosed in his talks around the nation – that Monsanto helped fund his outreach program. Kevin does almost all of this on his own time.
Hazmat Training: NFPA 472 Core Competency Training NFPA 472 Mission Specific Competency Chemical Specific Training Training Gap Analysis Other (Specify) Tentative Project Dates (to be completed by the applicant) Proposed Start Date Proposed Completion Date Estimated Cost of the Project Amount of HMEP funds requested If you are willing to accept partial funding, indicate the amount Match share (multiply the amount of HMEP funds requested by 0.25, which equals to the (20/80) % Match share) Full Partial Description Of Match (All Match must be non-federal (e.g. EMPG, DHS, etc.), not allocated to other grant)) Match Description Full ($) Partial ($) Type of match (soft-match or cash, or both) Source (time of fire fighter, law enforcement, students, citizen, first responder, others, etc.) Other (describe, e.g. indirect cost) Salary and/or fringe benefit (rate x hours)* Facility space used for planning/exercise HMEP project related travel (planning/training) to be used as match Equipment used for training/exercise (describe) Other allowable match (describe) Total match (non-federal and not used for any other federal and/or state funded projects) *Prevailing market rate can be used for salary, fringe benefits, equipment, and facilities if exact values are not known PROJECT NARRATIVE NEEDS ASSESSMENT: NEEDS ASSESSMENT: PROGRAM NEED = (DESIRED PROGRAM – ACTUAL PROGRAM) Describe the jurisdiction’s current need (hazmat planning, training, or exercise) using the steps below. Perform an accurate needs assessment, assess your hazmat program, identify gaps in planning and training, and provide a synopsis of the analysis. For exercise projects, describe if this is part of county’s multi-year training and exercise plan. If so, include a copy of the county’s multi-year training and exercise plan. If you have conducted exercises in the past with HMEP grant funds, explain how the current project differs from the previous ones. Explain if the county revised their plan based on the gap analysis or provided trainings to fill the gaps. Evaluate needed tasks, activities, and any supplies and equipment for the upcoming period. Determine if the needs coincide with the goals of your agency, and if the needs are feasible.
Develop priorities for tasks and activities to be conducted, prioritize need according to level of importance. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES: List hazmat emergency response program’s long and short term (upcoming grant cycle) goals and objectives. When determining goals and objectives for your program, ensure they: Align with state and PHMSA’s program Goals and Objectives (see PHMSA HMEP Guideline). Address the findings of the needs assessment, and ensure they are obtainable and reasonable, clear and concise, and measurable in terms of projected outputs and outcomes PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project narrative must fully describe the proposed activities. Project Activity Project Timeline Deliverables and End Products Monitoring and Evaluation Budget Narrative Project Activity The project narrative must fully describe the proposed activities. When listing Tasks & Activities, it is very important to remember the following: