IRRS-TEAM APPENDIX I – LIST OF PARTICIPANTS INTERNATIONAL Georg SCHWARZ Eidgenoessisches Nuklearsicherheitsinspektorat (ENSI) Lawrence KOKAJKO U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Alejandro CORTES Comision Nacional de Seguridad Nuclear y Salvaguardias (CNSNS) acortes@cnsns.gob.mx Pascal DEBOODT Nuclear Research Centre of MOL Roy EDWARDS Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) roy.edwards@cnsc-ccsn.gc.ca Andrea HECKEL Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS) aheckel@bfs.de Marja-Leena JÄRVINEN Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK) marja-leena.jarvinen@stuk.fi Vasiliki KAMENOPOULOU Greek Atomic Energy Commission (GAEC) vkamenop@eeae.gr Faizan MANSOOR Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority (PNRA) f.mansoor@pnra.org Mika MARKKANEN Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK) mika.markkanen@stuk.fi Timothy McCARTIN U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) timothy.mccartin@nrc.gov Hubert MENNESSIEZ Autorite de Surete Nucleaire (ASN) hubert.mennessiez@asn.fr Piet MÜSKENS Inspectie Leefomgeving en Transport (ILENT) piet.muskens@ilent.nl
09:00-12:30 Module Discussion/Interviews (SSM Counterparts) All 13:30-15:00 Policy Discussion 1 – Supervisory Strategies (SSM Counterparts) All 15:30-17:00 Policy Discussion 2 – Competence at SSM (SSM Counterparts) All 17:00- Team Meeting (SSM Liaison Officers), Report Drafting All Tuesday, 2012-02-14 08:30-09:00 IRRS meeting with SSM management TL, DTL, D. Graves, H. Suman 09:00-12:30 IRRS team review of report and its findings (SSM Liaison Officers) All 13:00-17:00 IRRS team review of report and its findings (SSM Liaison Officers) All 17:00-18:00 Team Meeting (SSM Liaison Officers), Report Drafting All 21:00 Initial Draft Report forwarded to SSM M. Ubani Wednesday, 2012-02-15 08:30-09:00 IRRS meeting with SSM management TL, DTL, D. Graves, H. Suman 09:00-12:30 SSM review of draft IRRS Draft Report (SSM Counterparts) All 13:30-18:00 SSM review of draft IRRS Draft Report (SSM Counterparts) All 17:00-18:00 Team Meeting All Thursday, 2011-12-01 09:00-10:30 Discussion of SSM Report Review All 10:30-17:00 Plenary review of Draft Report (SSM Management/Project Teams) All
APPENDIX III – SITE VISITS SITE VISITS Forsmark NPP Westinghouse Fuel fabrication facility Clab Intermediate Storage Facility for Spent Fuel Studsvik Nuclear AB SVAFO/Studsvik Karolinska Institutet – PET cyclotron Akademiska hospital in Uppsala
6. REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT Teodros Hailu Faizan Mansoor Piet Muskens Mika Markannen Anna Norstedt Carl-Göran Stålnacke Lennart Carlsson Svante Ernberg Erik Welleman Helene Jönsson Leif Karlsson Lars Skånberg Eric Häggblom Stig Wingefors 7. INSPECTION Sweng-Woong Woo Hubert Mennesiez Teodros Hailu Mika Markannen Anna Norstedt Carl-Göran Stålnacke Lennart Carlsson Svante Ernberg Erik Welleman Helene Jönsson Leif Karlsson Lars Skånberg Eric Häggblom Stig Wingefors 8. ENFORCEMENT Sweng-Woong Woo Hubert Mennesiez Teodros Hailu Mika Markannen Anna Norstedt Carl-Göran Stålnacke Lennart Carlsson Svante Ernberg Erik Welleman Helene Jönsson Leif Karlsson Lars Skånberg Eric Häggblom Stig Wingefors 9. REGULATIONS AND GUIDES Marja-Leena Järvinen Rustem Paci Anna Norstedt Ulf Yngvesson Carl-Göran Stålnacke Lennart Carlsson Svante Ernberg Erik Welleman Helene Jönsson Leif Karlsson Lars Skånberg Eric Häggblom
Stig Wingefors 10. TRANSPORT OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL George Sallit Erik Welleman Charlotte Ahlberg - 11. EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE Alejandro Cortes Peter Zombori Johan Friberg Lynn Hubbard 12. RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DECOMMISSIONING, OCCUPATIONAL, PUBLIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE CONTROL Hazem Suman Vasiliki Kamenopoulou Pascal DeBoodt Timothy McCartin Inmaculada Simon Cirujano Andrea Heckel Johan Anderberg Carl-Göran Stålnacke Johanna Sandwall Bo Strömberg Björn Dverstorp Henrik Efraimsson Ann-Christine Hägg Jan Lillhök Kirlna Skeppström Peter Hofvander Helene Jönsson Bengt Hedberg Stig Wingefors Anders Wiebert Ansi Gerhardsson Erik Welleman Mathias Leisvik Erica Brewitz Maria Lüning Ann-Louis Söderman 13. REGULATORY IMPLICATIONS OF THE TEPCO FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI ACCIDENT Ivan Lux Lynn Hubbard Jan Hanberg Anders Hallman
5. AUTHORIZATION R8 Recommendation: The government should establish responsibility for institutional control and for procedures for the termination of the license. S5 Suggestion: SSM may consider including public participation in a formal way in all stages of its licensing and authorization process. R9 Recommendation: The government should establish a national strategy and system for gaining and regaining control over orphan sources including for providing rapid response when orphan sources are discovered. S6 Suggestion: SSM should consider cross-checking information from suppliers of radioactive source transfers to individual licensees against the information received from the licensees. 6. REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT GP6 Good Practice: The NPPs refurbishment program as required by SSM is a good practice. R10 Recommendation: SSM should thoroughly review and assess if the safety of facilities and activities involving radiation sources comply with regulatory requirements before granting a license. The review and assessment should be commensurate with radiation risks of the facilities and activities. 7. INSPECTION R11 Recommendation: SSM should carry out more inspections in the areas of transport, industrial, medical and research radiation facilities. R12 Recommendation: SSM should carry out more unannounced inspections in all facilities. R13 Recommendation: SSM’s regulatory inspection should incorporate monitoring, measuring and direct observation of the on-site operations.
defined in TS-R-1. 11. EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE R17 Recommendation: The Government should consider establishing a government level coordination body (committee, board etc.) that would be responsible for the coordination of the national efforts to cope with the longer term consequences of a severe emergency. A national radiation emergency response plan, which would describe the responsibilities and concepts of operation of this governmental body and the other response organizations, should also be drafted. S10 Suggestion: SSM should consider developing on-line, real-time access to NPPs operational and safety parameters. R18 Recommendation: SSM and other relevant authorities should control the inadvertent and illicit trafficking of radioactive material through the national borders. GP9 Good Practice: SSM has established a state-of-the-art Emergency Response Centre, equipped with all necessary tools, procedures, as well as a national network of mobile and stationary laboratories to manage the emergency response. GP10 Good Practice: The regional cooperation initiative of the Nordic countries NEP is a good example of regional collaboration. 12. RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DECOMMISSIONING, OCCUPATIONAL, PUBLIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE CONTROL GP11 Good Practice: The provision of guidance material for specific areas where ionizing radiations are used and/or produced as well as the identification of actions to be undertaken for improving the regulations on the protection and the safety of workers is acknowledged as a positive indicator of a high level of commitment from SSM in order to foster the implementation of the regulations concerning the occupational exposure. GP12 Good Practice: As well for the nuclear as for the non-nuclear activities, the requirements for identifying Radiation Protection Experts and the