ADVISING and MENTORING 1 Does Not Meet Expectations (Unsatisfactory) 2 Partially Meets Expectations 3 Meets Expectations (Satisfactory) 4 Meets High Expectations 5 Exceeds Expectations (Exemplary) any of the following criteria: Repeatedly refuses program invitation to advise students Engenders frequent student complaints about availability and/or quality of advisement Meets any of the following criteria: Engenders occasional complaints availability and/or quality of advisement Does not actively engage with advisees regarding academic and career goals on a regular basis Fulfills two or more of the following, or other benchmarks as defined with Department chair: Appropriately advises undergraduate and/or graduate students on courses of study Actively engages with advisees regarding academic and career goals on a regular basis Writes recommendations for advisees in pursuit of positions and/or awards Chairs master’s thesis, PhD dissertation, and/or EdD capstone committees Serves on master’s thesis and/or doctoral program PhD dissertation or EdD capstone committees Mentors doctoral students to meet PhD program goals and milestones Fulfills criteria for “Meets Expectations,” plus one or more of following: Promotes doctoral and/or masters student achievement by collaborating on scholarly activities with students (e.g., co-authoring papers) Provides opportunities for research or applied training through hosting regular “lab” meetings and/or journal clubs with students Provides frequent feedback on student research via individual mentoring Provides frequent feedback to students regarding clinical or education experiences via direct supervision Promotes undergraduate student success by providing exemplary mentoring, advising and/or supervising Demonstrates exceptional performance for multiple criteria in #4 and/or: Leads or plays major role in program, dept. or school effort to improve quantity and quality of advising through metrics, guidelines or activities for faculty and students or plays major role in program, dept. or effort to provide a formal or informal series of sessions on research or clinical issues, or a student research symposium
SCHOLARSHIP 1 Does Not Meet Expectations (Unsatisfactory) 2 Partially Meets Expectations 3 Meets Expectations (Satisfactory) 4 High Expectations 5 Exceeds Expectations (Exemplary) Demonstrates any combination of the following criteria: No publications No presentations No active research program (e.g., no data collection underway or planned) Demonstrates any combination of the following criteria: Publishes only materials Has work actively in progress but no publications (submits manuscripts for publication) Presents only at local, state conferences Fulfills three or more of the following, or other benchmarks as defined with Department chair: Publishes 1-2 refereed articles Revises a textbook; publishes 1-2 chapters in edited volume Presents at 1-2 national/international conferences Has additional work in progress Has active research program (e.g., has data collection underway, engaged in publication and presentation) Participates in work of previously funded grant Submits one or more proposals for external funding Fulfills criteria for “Meets Expectations,” plus one or more of following: Meets additional criteria for “Meets Expectations.” Publishes additional refereed articles Publishes additional chapters in edited volumes Publishes a new book Serves as associate editor for a peer-reviewed journal Presents additional papers at major conferences Delivers invited address or scholarly keynote at national or international conference Receives funding for a grant Develops and publishes tests, software, videos Provides leadership in previously funded grant Edits or co-edits a journal Meets multiple criteria in #4 or Demonstrates exceptional performance in a single criterion in #4 (e.g., 4 peer reviewed papers in major journals, multiple grants funded, book published that wins accolades or awards) Leads or plays major role in school effort to improve research capacity or productivity (e.g., staffs or supervises data warehouse, provides methods training for faculty thru workshops and ongoing support, serves as internal reviewer for grants and publications) Edits or co-edits a top peer-reviewed journal in respective field
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE/OUTREACH 1 Does Not Meet Expectations (Unsatisfactory) 2 Partially Meets Expectations 3 Meets Expectations (Satisfactory) 4 Meets High Expectations 5 Exceeds Expectations (Exemplary) Meets any of the following criteria: Does not provide evidence of interacting with the field Meets any of the following criteria: Demonstrates minimal interaction with the participation in local or regional service; no leadership role or ongoing role. Fulfills two or more of the following, or other benchmarks as defined with Department chair: Participates actively in relevant professional associations Regularly reviews papers for journals Reviews proposals for conferences Consults (e.g., provides training/technical assistance to K-12 schools, IHEs, or other appropriate agencies) Serves on committees for state, national, and/or international associations. Fulfills criteria for “Meets Expectations,” plus any of following: Chairs committee(s) of state/national/ international associations Reviews an exceptional number of papers for journals Serves on editorial board for scholarly national journal Serves on review board for federal or foundation grants Serves as external reviewer for promotion/tenure dossier(s) Leads major partnership service project Serves on external review teams Demonstrates exceptional performance for multiple criteria in #4 and/or: Serves as elected president or on board of a major state or national professional organization Initiates a major partnership service project
any of the following criteria: Does not attend/ participate in program/ area governance Participates in governance role (e.g., Program Coordinator, search chair), but clearly does not meet performance criteria for role Does not on any school-wide or university committees Negative interactions with peers, staff or students causes disruption at program or school level Meets any of the following criteria: Participates minimally in program/area governance Neutral to negative interactions with colleagues, staff and students Does not participate in academic or service activities in the school (e.g., doctoral seminars) even when specifically invited Participation in governance role (e.g., Program Coordinator, search chair) only partially meets performance criteria for role Fulfills two or more of the following, or other benchmarks as defined with Department chair: Neutral to positive interactions with colleagues, staff and students Participates actively in Program/Department/ or Curry governance and/or administration (i.e., attends a reasonable number of meetings and/or functions and contributes to decision-making and program planning/revision/change) Serves on a Program/Department/ Curry and/or UVa committee Fulfills criteria for “Meets Expectations,” plus one or more of the following: Serves capably in a leadership and/or administrative role in Curry or UVa governance (e.g., Program Coordinator, Chairs Search Committee) Serves as identified mentor for pre-tenure faculty and is evaluated positively in that role Serves on multiple committees with recognition of making a contribution Regularly contributes when asked to carry out specific function (e.g., serving on panel, doing a brown bag presentation, representing Curry at a meeting, etc.) Contributes to program, department and/or school strategic planning Collaborates effectively on new strategic initiatives Meets criteria in #4 and/or meets “expectations” criteria in #3, plus one or more of the following: Provides exemplary leadership filling a demanding school-wide role (e.g., Faculty Council, Promotion and Tenure committee, Program Coordinator) Leads major initiative in connection with larger University, School, or Dept/Program aims (e.g., international programs, service programs, new Curry degrees, etc.) Spearheads collaboration between programs on strategic initiative Serves as of a University-level service role (e.g., Faculty Senate, P&T) and meets expectations of the role Serves on committees at multiple levels of governance and/or administration (program, school, university) and meets expectations for such service