Please check the box in each row that best matches your observationally-based appraisal of the student: Engagement with Individual, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities: Establishes contact, builds rapport, forms working relationships, and invites a diverse array of clients, stakeholders, and/or community partners to participate in clinical services and/or administrative projects. Improvement Desired Competence Mastery Does not reach out to key stakeholders; ignores or passively approaches Identifies and reaches out to most stakeholders on multiple levels of systems (program, agency, and community) Strategically identifies and reaches out to influential stakeholders on multiple levels of key systems (program, agency, and community) Unable to assess Unable to introduce self, role and goals to a variety of stakeholders Introduces self, role and goals to a variety of stakeholders in a clear manner Introduces self, role and goals to a side variety of stakeholders in a clear, concise, and inviting manner Unable to assess Unable to establish rapport with stakeholders; unable to discover their interests and agendas Establishes rapport with most stakeholders; elicits their interests, agenda, and investment Establishes rapport even with highly reluctant stakeholders; attunes to their interests and agenda; strengthens their investment Unable to assess Unable to achieve an acceptable participation rate Achieves an acceptable participation rate and level of participation Achieves an exceptional participation rate and level of participation Unable to assess Considering the above items and other relevant factors, how would you rate the student’s overall level of competence related to engagement? 1 2 3 4 5 Unable to Assess Not Proficient Competent Exceptional Mastery Assign a number to the nearest .50 increment: Unable to Assess Specific examples of student attainment for this competency (must contain supporting details particularly for scores above 4.0): Specific ways student could enhance or improve competency in this area (most contain supporting details particularly for scores 1.5 or below):
Please check the box in each row that best matches your observationally-based appraisal of the student: 2. Consultation, Coordination, and Collaboration: Obtains information from a variety of collaterals, stakeholders, and/or other environmental sources, both formal and informal, and integrates into a coordinated service and/or project plan. Improvement Desired Competence Mastery Unable to synthesize and integration information and perspectives from numerous stakeholders Able to synthesize and integrate information and perspectives from numerous stakeholders Exceptionally able to synthesize and integrate information and perspectives from numerous stakeholders, even when agendas are in conflict Unable to assess Unable to coordinate information and/or projects with multiple stakeholders Able to coordinate information and/or projects with a variety of stakeholders Exceptionally able to coordinate information and/or projects with all stakeholders Unable to assess Unable to convey information to stakeholders in a clear, effective way Conveys information to most stakeholders in a clear, effective way Conveys information to all stakeholders in a strategic, persuasive manner Unable to assess Unable to interact with, coordinate with, or collaborate with multiple systems Provides effective consultation, collaboration, and coordination with multiple systems Provides strategic coordination to optimize support from and beneficial exchanges among programs, agencies, and communities Unable to assess Considering the above items and other relevant factors, how would you rate the student’s overall level of competence related to consultation, coordination, and collaboration? 1 2 3 4 5 Unable to Assess Not Proficient Competent Exceptional Mastery Assign a number to the nearest .50 increment: Unable to Assess Specific examples of student attainment for this competency (must contain supporting details particularly for scores above 4.0): Specific ways student could enhance or improve competency in this area (most contain supporting details particularly for scores 1.5 or below):
Assign a number to the nearest .50 increment: Unable to Assess Specific examples of student attainment for this competency (must contain supporting details particularly for scores above 4.0): Specific ways student could enhance or improve competency in this area (most contain supporting details particularly for scores 1.5 or below): Please check the box in each row that best matches your observationally-based appraisal of the student: 7. Evaluation of Systemic Efforts and/or Interventions: Collects, analyzes, and applies data on the effectiveness of program, system, and/or efforts so as to shape the overall delivery of social work services. Improvement Desired Competence Mastery Lacks skill at program and/or systems evaluation and program improvement Demonstrates some skill at program and/or systems evaluation and improvement Demonstrates a high level of skill in program and/or systems evaluation and improvement Unable to assess Unable to use a variety of data collection strategies (e.g. focus groups, surveys, key informant interviews and/or literature reviews) Displays developing skill at using a variety of data collection strategies (e.g. focus groups, surveys, informant interviews, literature reviews) Effectively uses a variety of data collection strategies (e.g. focus groups, surveys, key informant interviews and/or literature reviews) Unable to assess Displays minimal ability to analyze data using a variety of means relevant to program, agency, or community Demonstrates some ability to analyze data using a variety of means relevant to program, agency, or community Displays excellent ability to analyze data using a variety of means relevant to program, agency, or community Unable to assess Displays minimal ability to accurately interpret results for program/policy implications and/or systemic improvement Accurately interprets most results for program/policy implications and/or systemic improvement efforts Accurately interprets results for program/policy implications and/or systemic improvement efforts Unable to assess Considering the above items and other relevant factors, how would you rate the student’s overall level of competence related to evaluation of systemic efforts? 1 2 3 4 5 Unable to Assess Not Proficient Competent Exceptional Mastery Assign a number to the nearest .50 increment: Unable to Assess wide
Specific examples of student attainment for this competency (must contain supporting details particularly for scores above 4.0): Specific ways student could enhance or improve competency in this area (most contain supporting details particularly for scores 1.5 or below): Please check the box in each row that best matches your observationally-based appraisal of the student: 9. Written and Verbal Communication Skills: Communicates orally and in writing in an organized, complete, and timely manner. Delivers communication in an effective manner given its purpose and context. Improvement Desired Competence Mastery Verbal communication is late, absent, disorganized, incomplete, aggressive, or delivered ineffectively Verbal communication is mostly timely, organized, complete, assertive, and effective Verbal communication skillfully presents information in a complete, organized, concise, and persuasive manner Unable to assess Written work is not completed to standard and requires excessive amounts of time and multiple revisions Completes written work in a reasonably efficient and complete manner Written work is exceptional in its quality, clarity, comprehensiveness, brevity, and timeliness Unable to assess Unresponsive to email or phone calls Responds to communication from others in a timely manner Consistently responds to communication from others in a timely and complete manner Unable to assess Lacks confidence in presenting ideas to others orally and in writing Exhibits developing confidence in presenting ideas to others orally and in writing Exhibits confidence and creativity in presenting ideas to others orally and in writing Unable to assess Unable to adapt communication style according to purpose, situation, or context; may lack diplomacy and/or cultural proficiency; may offend some stakeholders Often adapts style and delivery of communication to fit a diverse array of persons, situations, and contexts in formal or informal settings with a variety of stakeholders Consistently demonstrates superior diplomacy, and/or effectiveness in formal or informal settings with a wide variety of stakeholders Unable to assess Considering the above items and other relevant factors, how would you rate the student’s overall level of competence related to communication?