Value quantitative or Qualitative) 0.84 0.89 NA 0.87 Date achieved 07/23/2013 02/28/2017 NA 02/28/2017 Comments (incl. % achievement) GPI improved over the life of the Project, although falling short of the end-of-Project target. Source: 2016 Provincial census data. Indicator 3: quality (Equateur) French textbook/ pupil ratio for Grades 3 and 4 Value quantitative or Qualitative) 0.62 1 NA 0.92 Date achieved 07/23/ 2013 02/28/2017 NA 02/28/2017 Comments (incl. % achievement) Substantial progress was observed over the life of the Project, although falling short of the end-of-project target. Source: Project implementation team M&E reports. Indicator 4: quality (Equateur) French textbook/pupil ratio for Grades 5 and 6 Value quantitative or Qualitative) 0.3 1 NA 1.37 Date achieved 07/23/2013 02/28/2017 NA 02/28/2017 Comments (incl. % achievement) Target exceeded. Source: Project implementation team M&E reports. Indicator 5: quality (Equateur) Math textbook/pupil ratio for Grades 3 and 4 Value quantitative or Qualitative) 0.6 1 NA 1 Date achieved 07/23/2013 02/28/2017 NA 02/28/2017 Comments (incl. % achievement) Target achieved. Source: Project implementation team M&E reports. Indicator 6: quality (Equateur) Math textbook/pupil ratio for Grades 5 and 6 Value quantitative or Qualitative) 0.3 1 NA 1.44 Date achieved 07/23/2013 02/28/2017 NA 02/28/2017 Comments (incl. % achievement) Target exceeded. Source: Project implementation team M&E reports. Indicator 7: management (Equateur) Percentage of bureaux gestionnaires de proximité financially supported by the Project. Value quantitative or Qualitative) 0 65% NA 81% Date achieved 07/23/2013 02/28/2017 NA 02/28/2017
Comments (incl. % achievement) Target exceeded. Indicator modified at MTR. Source: Project implementation team M&E reports. Indicator 8: access (Kasai-West) Primary net intake rate Disaggregated by Male, Female, Value quantitative or Qualitative) M :91% F 79% T : 85% M : 98% F : 92% T : 95% NA M :80% F: 80% T: 80% Date achieved 07/23/2013 02/28/2017 NA 02/28/2017 Comments (incl. % achievement) Data suggest a decrease in the primary net first-year intake rate in Kasai-West from the original baseline. Level of achievement cannot be determined given data inconsistencies across the project life. Indicator 9: equity (Kasai-West) Gender Parity Index Value quantitative or Qualitative) 0.84 0.88 NA 0.93 Date achieved 07/23/2013 02/28/2017 NA 02/28/2017 Comments (incl. % achievement) Target exceeded. Source: 2015-2016 Provincial census data. Indicator 10: quality (Kasai-West) French textbook/ pupil ratio for Grades 3 and 4. This is based on the best estimate from project implementation team M&E reports. Value quantitative or Qualitative) 0.64 1 NA 0.72 Date achieved 07/23/ 2013 02/28/2017 NA 02/28/2017 Comments (incl. % achievement) Substantial progress observed over the life of the Project, although falling short of the end-of-project target. Source: Project implementation team M&E reports. Indicator 11: quality French textbook/pupil ratio for Grades 5 and 6 quantitative or Qualitative) 0.4 1 NA 1 Date achieved 07/23/ 2013 02/28/2017 NA 02/28/2017 Comments (incl. % achievement) Target achieved. Source: Project implementation team M&E reports. Indicator 12: quality (Kasai-West) Math textbook/pupil ratio for Grades 3 and 4 quantitative or Qualitative) 0.5 1 NA 0.84 Date achieved 07/23/ 2013 02/28/2017 NA 02/28/2017 Comments (incl. % achievement) Substantial progress observed over the life of the Project, although falling short of the end-of-project target. Source: Project implementation team M&E reports.
Indicator 13: quality (Kasai-West) Math textbook/pupil ratio for Grades 5 and 6 Value quantitative or Qualitative) 0.4 1 NA 1 Date achieved 07/23/ 2013 02/28/2017 NA 02/28/2017 Comments (incl. % achievement) Target achieved. Source: Project implementation team M&E reports. Indicator 14: management (Kasai-West) Percentage of bureaux gestionnaires de proximité financially supported by the project Value quantitative or Qualitative) 0 65% NA 82% Date achieved 07/23/ 2013 02/28/2017 NA 02/28/2017 Comments (incl. % achievement) Target exceeded. Indicator modified from “bureaux gestionnaires de proximité functioning according to regulatory and under results agreement.” Source: Project implementation team M&E reports. PDOs indicators modified and/or dropped at the MTR Indicator 15: management (Equateur) Percentage of bureaux gestionnaires de proximité functioning according to regulatory norms and under results agreement. Value quantitative or Qualitative) 0 Date achieved 07/23/ 2013 02/28/2017 Comments (incl. % achievement) Indicator 16: management (Kasai-West) Percentage of bureaux gestionnaires de proximité functioning according to regulatory norms and under results agreement. Value quantitative or Qualitative) 0 Date achieved 07/23/ 2013 02/28/2017 Comments (incl. % achievement) Indicator dropped and replaced by PDO Indicator 14 above. (b) Intermediate Outcome Indicator(s) Indicator Baseline Value Original Target Values (from approval documents) Formally revised target Values Actual Value Achieved at Completion or Target Years
Date achieved 07/23/ 2013 02/28/2017 NA 02/28/2017 Comments (incl. % achievement) Target partially achieved. This indicator was during the MTR to assess the impact of teacher training sessions on teaching practices. By the end of the project, a draft monitoring tool was available but had not yet used. Indicator 20 (Kasai-West) Percentage of Bureaux Gestionnaires de Proximite (BGPs) having Comite de Gestion des Ecoles (COGES) quarterly meetings as documented by the Minutes quantitative or Qualitative) - 75 NA 82 Date achieved 07/23/ 2013 02/28/2017 NA 02/28/2017 Comments (incl. % achievement) Target exceeded. This indicator was added during the MTR to monitor BGPs and related COGES meetings. The indicator replaced: “Percentage of schools having COGES quarterly meetings as documented by the Minutes”. The 2013 baseline is not available. Source: Project implementation team M&E reports. Indicator 21 one (Kasai-West) Annual qualitative surveys undertaken (“Bureaux gestionnaires de proximité” no longer collecting fees from the schools) quantitative or Qualitative) 0 3 NA 2 Date achieved 07/23/ 2013 02/28/2017 NA 02/28/2017 Comments (incl. % achievement) Partially achieved. Two annual qualitative surveys were undertaken in 2014 and 2016. Source: Project implementation team M&E reports. Intermediate indicators dropped at the MTR Indicator 22: management (Equateur) Percentage of “cellule pédagogique” organizing (at once every week during working hours) Value quantitative or Qualitative) 10 N/A Date achieved 07/23/ 2013 02/28/2017 Comments (incl. % achievement) Indicator 23: management (Kasai-West) Percentage of “cellule pédagogique” organizing (at least once every week during working hours) Value quantitative or Qualitative) 10 N/A Date achieved 07/23/ 2013 02/28/2017
Table 7: Textbooks/pupils ratio Indicators Provinces Indicators Baseline 2011(PAD) Baseline 2013 Target 2011 (PAD) Target derived from 2013 data Project closing Equateur Indicator Three (Quality) French textbooks: Pupil ratio for Grades 3 and 4 (Equateur Province) (Percentage, Custom) 0.40 0.60 1 1 0.92 Indicator Four (Quality) French textbooks: Pupil ratio for Grades 5 and 6 (Equateur Province) (Percentage, Custom) 0.20 0.30 1 1 1.37 Indicator Five (Quality) Math textbooks: ratio for primary education for Grades 3 and 4 (Equateur Province) (Percentage, Custom) 0.40 0.62 1 1 1 Indicator Six (Quality) Math textbooks: Pupil ratio for primary education for Grades 5 and 6 (Equateur Province) (Percentage, Custom) 0.30 0.29 1 1 1.44 Kasai-West Indicator Three (Quality) French textbooks: Pupil ratio for Grades 3 and 4 (Kasai-West Province) (Percentage, Custom) 0.40 0.64 1 1 0.72 Indicator Four (Quality) French textbooks: Pupil ratio for Grades 5 and 6 (Kasai-West Province) (Percentage, Custom) 0.20 0.40 1 1 1 Indicator Five (Quality) Math textbooks: ratio for primary education for Grades 3 and 4 (Kasai-West Province) (Percentage, Custom) 0.40 0.50 1 1 0.84 Indicator Six (Quality) Math textbooks: ratio for primary education for Grades 5 and 6 (Kasai-West Province) (Percentage, Custom) 0.30 0.40 1 1 1 Number of textbooks and teacher guides distributed (Nationwide indicator) (Number, Custom) 0 0 In addition, the capacity of the division in charge of development of learning materials (DIPROMAD) was enhanced in preparation, definition of technical/pedagogical specifications, and distribution of textbooks. Further, DIPROMAD was provided with digital equipment that enables staff to develop distance learning program. Lastly, the project supported the development of a textbook policy and textbook distribution monitoring software. By and large the components two indicators were achieved. The Project succeeded in activating and improving school/local based in-service training program and in providing textbooks and teachers’ guides in all primary schools. Successful elements of the distance learning in-service teachers training program are ready for scale up. 000
Indicator Four (Quality): French textbook/pupil ratio for Grades 5 and 6 0.20 1 0.3 1 0,27 No change 0.45 No change 1 1.37 End target exceeded. For Grades 5 and 6, the project aimed to provide a textbook for each student. Additional quantities procured arose from the inaccuracy of student enrolment data, and. will be used as contingency stocks. Indicator Five (Quality): Math textbook/pupil ratio for Grades 3 and 4 0.40 1 0.62 1 0,57 No change 0.78 No Change 1 1 Target achieved. Indicator Six (Quality): Math textbook/pupil ratio for Grades 5 and 6 0.30 1 0.3 1 0.28 No change 0.38 No Change 1 1.44 End target exceeded. For Grades 5 and 6, the project aimed at providing a textbook for each student. Additional quantities procured arose from the inaccuracy of student enrolment data, and. will be used as contingency stocks. Indicator seven (Management): % of “bureaux gestionnaires de proximité” functioning according to regulatory norms and under results agreement 0 75% 00 65 % 23 % No change 80.67 No change 65% 81% Target exceeded. Since July 2015, this indicator has been calculated as “% of bureaux gestionnaires de proximité financially supported by the project.” The remaining BGPs, not supported by the project, were not part of the Government’s official list of BGPs. Intermediate-Level Indicators - Equateur Original PAD Revised 2013 Mid Term Review (2015) No official restructuring, but RF change in MTR Report Restructuring (2016) Project extension Project Closing
Indicator Original Baseline End Target for 2016 Baseline 2013 End Target for 2016 Achievement as of June 2015 Mid Term Review Indicator Change Achievement as of August 2016 Indicator Change Revised Target for New Closing Date, February 2017 Project Closing February 2017 Comments Indicator eight Project beneficiaries: # of primary school students, of which girls T:1,323,351 F:578,688 T:1,530,080 F:719,200 T:1368323 F:624452 T:1495203 F:682356 T:1,477,797 F:676,399 No change T:1,582,506 F:730,735 No change T:1,495,203 F:682,356 T:1,553,583 F:721,743 End target exceeded. Based on the provincial-level annual school census, prepared with project support, the project has contributed to increased school enrolment in project areas. However, because of funding constraints, the Government could not prepare a nationwide annual school census. It would have been interesting to compare the average increase in project areas to that in the rest of the country. Further, reliability of the baseline is not guaranteed; the same number is reported in the PAD (2010) and after the MTR (2013), suggesting that the number of beneficiaries remained exactly the same over a two-year period. Indicator nine Primary 1st year new entrants, of which girls T:255,524 F:115,683 T:296,130 F:142,080 T:341103 F:159520 T:372,732 F:173,875 T:344,970 F:160,799 No change T:372,352 F:175,200 No change T:372,732 F:173,875 T:420,300 F:190,887 End target largely exceeded, including for girls, although the number of female first-year entrants is slightly lower (in terms of proportion) than for males.
Indicator fourteen Project beneficiaries: Teachers benefitting training (cumulative) 0 21,000 00 16,000 NA No change 12,336 No change 16,000 19,080 Substantial progress observed from the baseline, even as shortfall recorded compared to end-line target. A total of 19,080 teachers, school heads and inspectors were trained during the three years of the project cycle, in three of the 10 modules and 255 inspectors were trained in 7 of the 10 modules. This gap arises primarily from logistical challenges and delays in the design of teacher training. Indicator fifteen % of school clusters having organized inter-school pedagogical meetings (3 per year) 10 80 10 75% NA No change 6.62% No change 75% 75% Target achieved. The figure includes all meetings, including those supported by the project. Indicator sixteen % of “cellule pédagogique” organizing (at once every week during working hours) 0 10% 10% 80% N/A Dropped Indicator dropped during Mid Term Review and replaced by “Monitoring and evaluation tool is used by inspectors during school supervision,” thereby enabling a better appreciation of the teacher training tool. Indicator seventeen A monitoring tool is used by inspectors during supervision New Indicator 0 No change 1 0 This indicator was added during the Mid Term Review to assess the impact of teacher training sessions on teaching practices. By the end of the project, a draft monitoring tool was available but not yet used. Target partially achieved. Indicators - Equateur
Original PAD Revised 2013 Mid Term Review (2015) No official restructuring, but RF change in MTR Report Restructuring (2016) Project extension Project Closing Indicator Original Baseline End Target for 2016 Baseline 2013 End Target for 2016 Achievement as of June 2015 Mid Term Review Indicator Change Achievement as of August 2016 Indicator Change Revised Target for New Closing Date, February 2017 Project Closing February 2017 Comments Indicator eighteen % of schools having COGES quarterly meetings as documented by the Minutes 0 80 0 80% 31% Dropped Target exceeded. Because the project provides financial resources to BGPs and none to COGES, the Midterm Review decided to monitor BGPs related COGES meetings instead of COGES meetings at school level. Indicator nineteen % of BGP having COGES quarterly meetings as documented by the Minutes New indicator 81% No change 75% 82% Indicator twenty Annual qualitative surveys undertaken (“Bureaux gestionnaires de proximité” no longer collecting fees from the schools) 0 3 0 3 1 No change 1 No change 3 2 Target partially achieved (67%). Two annual qualitative surveys were undertaken. Critically, in of the fact that the original target in the PAD is 1, this should have been 3 (one survey per year); thus, for the three years of PROSEB, three surveys were expected to take place. Two surveys took place; respectively in 2015 and 2016. PDOs-Level Indicators – Kasai West Original PAD Revised 2013 Mid Term Review (2015) Restructuring (2016) Project extension Project Closing
Indicator twenty-four (Quality): French textbooks: ratio for Grade 5 and Grade 6 0.2 1 0.4 1 0.37 No change 0.62 No 1 1 Target achieved. For Grades 5 and 6, the project aimed at providing textbooks for each student. Indicator twenty-five (Quality): Math textbooks: pupil ratio for primary education for Grade 3 and 4 0.4 1 0.5 1 0.54 No change 0.65 No 1 0.84 Substantial progress observed from the baseline, even as shortfall recorded compared to end-line target. The project aimed at complementing Grade 3 and 4 textbooks already available in schools. This gap arises from inaccurate data relating to textbooks needed and student enrolment. Indicator twenty-six (Quality): Math textbooks: pupil ratio for primary education for Grade 5 and 6 0.3 1 0.4 1 0.38 No change 0.64 No 1 1 Target achieved. For Grades 5 and 6, the project at providing a textbook for each student. Indicator twenty seven (Management): % of “bureaux gestionnaires de proximité” functioning according to regulatory norms and under results agreement 0 65% 00 65% 23 % No change 78% No 65% 82% Target exceeded. Since July 2015, this indicator has been calculated as “% of bureaux gestionnaires de proximité financially supported by the project.” The remaining BGPs, not supported by the project, were not part of the Government’s official list of BGPs. Intermediate-Level Indicators – Kasai West Original PAD Revised 2013 Mid Term Review (2015) No official restructuring, but RF change in MTR Report Restructuring (2016) Project extension Project Closing
Indicator Original Baseline End Target for 2016 Baseline 2013 End Target for 2016 Achievement as of June 2015 Mid Term Review Indicator Change Achievement as of August 2016 Indicator Change Revised Target for New Closing Date, February 2017 Project Closing February 2017 Comments Indicator twenty-eight Project beneficiaries: # of primary school students, of which girls T:987,219 F:436,791 T:1,152,300 F:530,120 T:1070043 F:486890 T:1169265 F:532038 T: 1,181,365 F: 540,126 No change T: 1,306,855 F: 603,722 No change F:532,038 T: 1,433,961 F: 671,852 End target exceeded. Indicator twenty-nine Primary 1st year new entrants, of girls T:208,279 F:96,127 T:235,800 F:115,542 T: 275,292 F:128872 T:300819 F:140822 T: 313,216 F: 146,678 No change T: 341,829 F: 160,270 No change T:300819 F:140822 T: 382,525 F: 179,647 Target exceeded. Indicator thirty Additional classrooms rehabilitated or rebuilt 0 396 00 396 00 No change 324 No change 396 378 Substantial progress observed from the baseline, even as shortfall recorded compared to end-line target. Indicator thirty-one Number of latrine blocks 0 66 00 66 00 No change 54 No change 66 63 Substantial progress observed from the baseline, even as shortfall recorded compared to end-line target.
Indicator Thirty-two Number of water points installed 0 66 0 66 00 No change 9 No change 66 23 The significant gap between the expected and actual number of water points delivered arises from the fact than the water points delivered were much more expensive than the planned budget, in addition to technical and logistic related challenges. Target not achieved. Indicator thirty-three Project beneficiaries: Teachers benefiting in-service training (cumulative) 0 21,000 0 16,000 NA No change 9,702 No change 16,000 - Target not achieved. A total of 13,895 teachers, school heads and inspectors were trained in three of the 10 modules and 150 inspectors trained in 7 of the 10 modules. during the three years of the project cycle, instead of the 16,000 envisioned. The gap mainly arises from logistical challenges and delays in design of the in-service teacher training Indicator thirty-four % of school clusters, having organized inter-school pedagogical meetings (3 per year) 10 80 10 75% NA No change 5.23% No change 75% 83% Target achieved. Indicator thirty-five % of cellule pédagogique organizing (at least once every week during working hours) 10 80 10 80% Dropped Indicator dropped during Mid Term Review and replaced by “Monitoring and evaluation tool is used by inspectors for in-service training,” enabling a better appreciation of teacher training tools Indicator thirty-six Monitoring and evaluation tool is used by inspectors for in-service training. No New indicator No No change Yes No Substantial progress was made and a M&E tool was available and used by inspectors by the end of the project. Nevertheless, target partially achieved.
Indicators – Kasai West Original PAD Revised 2013 Mid Term Review (2015) No official restructuring, but RF change in MTR Report Restructuring (2016) Project extension Project Closing Indicator Original Baseline End Target for 2016 Baseline 2013 End Target for 2016 Achievement as of June 2015 Mid Term Review Indicator Change Achievement as of August 2016 Indicator Change Revised Target for New Closing Date, February 2017 Project Closing February 2017 Comments Indicator thirty-seven % of schools having COGES quarterly meetings as documented by the Minutes 0 80 00 80% 52% Dropped Because the project provided financial resources to BGPs and none to COGES, it was decided during the Mid Term review to monitor BGP- related COGES meetings rather than COGES meetings at school level. End target achieved. Indicator % of BGP having COGES quarterly meetings as documented by the Minutes. New indicator No change 75% 82.1%
Indicator thirty-nine Annual qualitative surveys undertaken (“Bureaux gestionnaires de proximité” no longer collecting fees from the schools) 0 3 00 3 1 No change 1 No change 3 2 Although the original target in the PAD baseline is 1, this should have been 3 (one survey per year). For the 3 years of PROSEB, therefore, three surveys were expected to take place. Two surveys took place; respectively in 2015 and 2016. Target partially achieved (67%).