Unacceptable 0 Minimally Done 1 Comprehensive 2 Score 1 Plan includes evidence that a team-based process was used. Plan not developed with a team or evidence is not presented. Evidence of team involvement in collection of information, however not for selection of interventions to be used (team participation evidenced by participant signatures and limited evidence of team involvement). Evidence of team involvement in collection of information and selection of all interventions used. 2 Plan identifies and defines functionally equivalent replacement behaviors or alternative behaviors for all targeted challenging behaviors. No functionally equivalent replacement behaviors or alternative behaviors are identified and defined. Functionally equivalent replacement behaviors or alternative behaviors are not identified or defined for all challenging behaviors. Plan identifies and defines all functionally equivalent replacement behaviors or alternative behaviors for all targeted challenging behaviors. 3 Plan identifies the method and timeline for team review of data and progress. No plan for team review is identified. Plan for team review of data and progress is identified but there is no timeline or it is more six months before team review. Plan identifies the method and timeline for team review of data and progress on an ongoing basis (at least quarterly). 4 The plan describes methods for providing opportunities for choice and social interaction. No intervention in the plan addresses these areas. Interventions do not adequately address opportunities for choice or social interaction. Interventions for choice and social interaction are clearly addressed. 5 The plan describes setting event and antecedent intervention based on the targeted challenging behaviors. No setting event or antecedent interventions are included. Setting event and/or antecedent interventions are included but are not clearly described or based on the targeted challenging behaviors. Setting event and antecedent interventions are clearly described and based on the targeted challenging behaviors. 6 Positive consequence interventions include an explanation of how they relate to the perceived function stated in the hypothesis. Positive interventions do not address the perceived function in the hypothesis statements. Positive interventions do not relate or relate incorrectly to the perceived function in the Each positive intervention specifically states how it related to the perceived function in the hypothesis statement.
implement the intervention(s) e.g. praise desired behavior. 11 At minimum one intervention relates specifically to increasing quality of life based on the Quality of Life Assessment. There are no quality of life interventions. Quality of life interventions do not directly relate to the Quality of Life Assessment or the person’s dream. An intervention that directly relates to improving the person’s quality of life as identified in a quality of life assessment, is clearly explained. 12 At least one intervention supports minimizing reinforcement for challenging behavior. There is no intervention to minimize reinforcement for challenging behavior. Intervention includes decreasing reinforcement of target challenging behavior but does not describe specifically how to implement. Intervention describes specifically how to tope of minimize reinforcement of challenging behaviors. 13 The plan includes how each intervention will be implemented and step-by-step directions that include the sequence of actions for implementation. The plan does not include the sequence of interventions or step-by-step directions that include the sequence of actions for implementation. The plan includes the sequence for interventions and directions for implementation, however either the plan is unclear or it is impossible to follow. All interventions in the plan are clearly described, logical, and presented sequentially. 14 Plans for staff training, generalization of skills, and dealing with life changes are included to sustain success. There is no mention of staff training, generalization of skills or dealing with life changes. Plan identifies staff training, generalization of skills or dealing with life changes, but not all three areas. Plan specifically addresses the need for staff training, generalization of new skills, and strategies to sustain success. 15 The plan is clear, well-organized, and grammatically correct, which permits the reader to follow the plan. Serious organizational or grammatical issues interfere with the read3er’s ability to follow the plan. The plan has organizational or grammatical issues, however, the issues don’t interfere with the reader’s ability to follow the plan. The plan is well-organized and grammatically correct with only minimal spelling, grammar or punctuation errors. A score of at least 28 out of 30 is required to be considered a complete PBSP. Total Score Reviewer comments: