AO1 Knowledge and understanding 6 marks Accurate and reasonably detailed Accurate and reasonably detailed answer that demonstrates sound knowledge and understanding of the procedures and findings of one or more relevant research studies. 5 – 4 marks Less detailed but generally accurate Less detailed but generally accurate answer that demonstrates relevant knowledge and understanding of the procedures and findings of one or more relevant research studies. 3 – 2 marks Basic Basic answer that demonstrates some relevant knowledge and understanding of the procedures and findings of one or more relevant research studies but lacks detail and may be muddled. 1 mark Very brief/flawed Very brief or flawed answer demonstrating very little knowledge of the procedures and findings of one or more relevant research studies. 0 marks No creditworthy material. M11. Marks for this question: AO1 = 6, AO3 = 6 Level Marks Description 4 10 – 12 Knowledge is accurate and generally well detailed. Evidence is clear. Discussion / evaluation / application is effective. The answer is clear, coherent. Specialist terminology is used effectively. Minor detail and / or expansion of argument sometimes lacking. 3 7 – 9 Knowledge is evident. Evidence is presented. There are occasional inaccuracies. There is some effective Discussion / evaluation / application. The answer is mostly clear and organised. Specialist terminology is mostly used appropriately. 2 4 – 6 Knowledge is present. Focus is mainly on description. Any discussion / evaluation / application is of limited effectiveness. The answer lacks clarity, accuracy and organisation in places. Specialist terminology is used
AO1 Knowledge and understanding AO2 Evaluation / commentary 4 marks Accurate and reasonably detailed Accurate and reasonably detailed description that demonstrates sound knowledge and understanding of research into misleading information. There is appropriate selection of material to address the question. 4 marks Effective commentary / evaluation Effective use of material to address the question and provide informed commentary / evaluation. Broad range of issues in reasonable depth or a narrower range in greater depth. 3 marks Less detailed but generally accurate Less detailed but generally accurate answer that demonstrates relevant knowledge and understanding of research into misleading information. There is some evidence of selection of material to address the question. 3 marks Reasonable commentary / evaluation Material is not always used effectively but produces a reasonable commentary / evaluation. A range of issues in limited depth, or a narrower range in greater depth. 2 marks Basic Basic answer that demonstrates some relevant knowledge and understanding of research into misleading information, but lacks detail and may be muddled. There is little evidence of selection of material to address the question. 2 marks Basic commentary / evaluation The use of material provides only basic commentary / evaluation demonstrates basic analysis. Superficial consideration of a restricted range of issues. 1 mark Very brief and or flawed Very brief or flawed answer that demonstrates very little knowledge of research into misleading information. Selection of material is largely inappropriate. 1 mark Rudimentary commentary / evaluation The use of material provides only a rudimentary commentary. Evaluation of research is just discernible or absent. 0 marks No creditworthy material. 0 marks No creditworthy material. M15. (a) AO2 = 3 The answer must clearly relate to one or more of the main techniques used in a cognitive interview (other than report everything):- Context reinstatement Recall from a changed perspective Recall in reverse order Some of the main additional features of the enhanced cognitive interview could