Objective: Establish a baseline to inform progress towards the goal of clean cookstoves and fuels adoption, and ensure proper monitoring and evaluation practices. After strategically planning for the work needed to develop the improved cookstoves and fuels markets in your country, it is essential to track and report the progress so that as a group you can evaluate areas of success and areas for improvement. Clearly understood and transparent indicators should be used that can measure results from the most basic project parameters like cookstove sales, adoption rates, household air pollution, fuel collection time, and fuel and cost savings, to broader objectives regarding saving lives, empowering women, improving livelihoods, and protecting the environment. The Alliance has developed a results reporting framework that can be used by stakeholders to monitor their work and in the near future will also provide stakeholders with online tools that will increase the ease with which they are able to track this information. Monitoring and evaluation tools: Results reporting framework () Ideas about other ways to encourage monitoring and evaluation Objective: Facilitate communication and cross border learnings. While we encourage stakeholders to learn from one another through the Community section of the Alliance’s website and at the Alliance’s regional and global events, the Alliance will also work in the coming months to connect each partner country to other countries that have similar developmental and socio-economic characteristics. By analyzing these factors and closely examining markets by country, the Alliance can connect countries so that they can share useful and applicable information about what types of actions have been successful at growing their improved cookstoves and fuels markets. Note: reporting to the Alliance on progress and challenges will be important in helping us evaluate where lessons learned could be the most applicable. Learning from other countries: Annual Regional Forums Biennial Global Forum Alliance will be in touch with you about this step in the coming months as we prepare this analysis for all of our partner countries. Objective: Ensure that the sector is using the most relevant information, monitoring its work, and seeking continued improvement by repeating the previous steps every three years. In a growing and evolving market and such as improved cookstoves and fuels, it is essential that the sector is able to keep up with new innovation, information, and insights. To make sure that each country’s consumers are able to benefit from the latest technological advances in areas like cleanliness
The work plan should be submitted to (contact name) at (email address), no later than (proposal deadline). The expected budget for this project is ______. Sample Score Sheet To Evaluate Proposals: Firm Name Proposed Methodology Proposed Deliverables Team Experience In Cookstoves Or Related Areas Firm And Proposal Strengths Firm And Proposal Weaknesses Budget Rank
Barriers and Intervention Options Identification Template: Barriers Intervention Options Key Steps And Activities Organizations Who Are Already Involved In This Area Organizations Who Are Well Positioned To Become Involved Timeline Measuring Progress Gender Implications Specific barriers preventing cookstoves from reaching scale What is needed to overcome this barrier? What does the sector need to do in order to achieve this intervention? organizations are currently working in this area? Which organizations should become involved in this area? How long will each step of this intervention take to complete? How will the sector measure progress towards achieving this outcome? What are key gender issues and opportunities that should be considered? 1) 2) 3) 4) 1) 2) 3) 4) 1) 2) 3) 4) 1) 2) 3) 4) 1) 2) 3) 4) 1) 2) 3) 4)
Coordinate Program Provide Funding Coordinate Project (Region) Centralize Act. (Mktg, Ops, Fin) Educate on HAP product awareness Run Promo Activities Import & retail stoves Design stoves Test stoves Train Stove Manufacturers Supply Materials Transport mat. to Manufacturer Make stoves Transport stove to customer Sell and install Stoves Maintain Stoves Multilaterals & Donors - EU, DGIS, USAID, DFID Government - Ministry of Energy Banks & Investment Funds Micro Finance Institutions – SACCOS INGOs and Local NGOs - GIZ, Practical Action, etc. Gas companies - LPG Fuel Providers Local manufacturers & suppliers Low Quality Stoves Suppliers - jua kali Local Quality Stove Suppliers International Manufacturers Local Entrepreneurs - Import, Retail, Distribution
Common Cooking Technologies: Kenyan Ceramic Jiko Uhai Multi-purpose stove Upesi (Portable and Liner) Cost $4-$10 $10 - $18 $9 $3-4 (Liner fixed) $10 (Portable) Thermal Efficiency 30-40% 36% 20% (Wood), 30% (Charcoal) 25-30% (Both) Firewood stove Manufacturer Various Keyo Pottery Enterprise, various Various Keyo Pottery Enterprises Kisumu and various potters in Western Key Features Ceramic with metal cladding. Production has been sustained on commercial basis Improvement on the KCJ with clay rim to retain and direct heat. Ceramic and metal cladding with removable charcoal grate so it can be used with both wood and charcoal – Liner is permanently installed in kitchens, (Liner) - Upesi liner with metal cladding for portability Production Capacity Demand driven. Collectively large but individual producers make a few hundred a month. Liner producers may have higher capacity. Not extensively produced- demand driven. Most production in the hundreds per month. Not extensively produced- demand driven. Most production in the hundreds per month. driven, liners are produced by individuals and groups and usually installed by trained installers in individual kitchens. Estimated over 1.2 million have been produced Portable- Extensively in western Kenya, Varies amongst regions, both in terms of quality and access. Estimated over 500,000 produced. Most producers can make several hundred per month. Distribution Channels Complete stoves sold through middlemen, retailers, markets & small vendors. Sold through retailers, middlemen and markets. Sold through retailers, middlemen and markets. -Liner sold and installed through installers at the individual level on a commission basis Portable- Complete stoves sold through retailers, middlemen and markets and small venders. Appendix 3: National Cookstove Alliance (if applicable) Notes to help the writer complete this section: This section should be completed only if a national
Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) Accra, Ghana Gabriel Nii Laryea Improved Cooking Technology Program Port au Prince, Jean Robert Altidor csaaltidor@gmail.com Zamorano University Improved Stove Certification Center Tegucigalpa, Honduras Timothy Longwell tlongwell@zamorano.edu Indian Institute of (IIT-Delhi) New Delhi, India Rajendra Prasad rprasadiitd@gmail.com Prakti Design Lab Pondicherry, India Mouhsine Serrar mouhsine@praktidesign.com The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI) New Delhi, India Perumal Raman praman@teri.res.in Asia Regional Cookstove Program (ARECOP) Yogyakarta, Indonesia Christina Aristanti Tjondroputro christina@arecop.org Industrial Research and Development Institute (KIRDI) Stove Testing Centre Nairobi, Kenya Nathan Bogonko nbogonko@gmail.com Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) Mexico City, Mexico Victor Berrueta vberrueta@gmail.com GIZ /EnDev Mozambique Mozambique Rosario Loayza Cortez rosario.loayza@giz.de Centre for Rural Technology, Nepal (CRT/N) Kathmandu, Nepal Hari Gopal Gorkhali gorkhali@crtnepal.org Regional Stoves Development and Testing Center at the International Centre for Energy, Environment and Development Afikpo, Nigeria Joseph Dioha Laboratorio de Certificación de Cocinas Mejoradas (SENCICO) Lima, Peru Gabriela Esparza Requejo gesparza@sencico.gob.pe The Centre for Study and Research on Renewable Energy (CERER) Dakar, Senegal Issakha Youm iyoum2@yahoo.fr
Sustainable energy Technology and Research Centre Johannesburg, South Africa Harold Annegarn hannegarn@gmail.com Nelson Mandel African Institute of Science and Technology Arusha, Tanzania K.N. Njau karoli.njau@nm-aist.ac.tz Institute of Technology Khlong Nueng, Thailand Nguyen Thi Kim Oanh kimoanh@ait.ac.th Dili Institute of Technology (DIT) Dili, Timor Leste Inacio Freitas Centre for Integrated Research and Community Development Uganda (CIRCODU) Kampala, Uganda Joseph Arineitwe Ndemere Centre for Research in Energy and Energy Conservation (CREEC) Kampala, Uganda Karsten Bechtel karsten@tech.mak.ac.ug Aprovecho Research Center Cottage Grove, U.S.A. Dean Still deankstill@gmail.com Berkeley Air Monitoring Berkeley, U.S.A. Michael Johnson mjohnson@berkeleyair.com Burn Design Lab Vashon Island, U.S.A. Paul Means paul@burndesignlab.org Clarkson University Potsdam, U.S.A. Phillip Hopke phopke@clarkson.edu Colorado State University Fort Collins, U.S.A. Morgan DeFoort Iowa State University Ames, U.S.A. Mark Bryden kmbryden@iastate.edu Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, U.S.A. Ashok Gadgil gadgil@ce.berkeley.edu U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, U.S.A. Jim Jetter jetter.jim@epa.gov University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign Urbana Champaign, U.S.A. Tami Bond yark@illinois.edu