zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Concerning library services, the CJMM reported that library hours were extended and regional libraries were opening on Saturdays with effect from June 2017 to coincide with examinations time. The following libraries were reported to be operational: Diepsloot Library, Jabavu Library, Protea North Library, Sandton Library, Johannesburg City Library, Yeoville Library, Ennerdale Extension 9 Library and Orange Farm Library. On the other hand, the Ivory Park North Library and the Randburg Library were reported to be closed due to renovations. 5.2.1 Inspection in-loco: Karsene Intermodal Public Transport Facility The Karsene Intermodal Public Transport Facility project was reported to be a strategic location as a gateway to the Johannesburg inner-city. The project was reported to have commenced in 2014 and is anticipated to be completed on 29 June 2018. The estimated project costs were reported to be R411 million which would include construction and professional fees. The CJMM reported that Phase 1- underground works, including foundation and piling - has been completed. Phase 2 was reported to be 60 per cent complete at the time of the visit and Phase 3 is expected to commence in the current financial year. The intermodal facility was reported to have been earmarked to cater for long distance taxi operators for holding and ranking; cross-border/long distance bus facilities (ranking only); retail (formal and informal sectors); and storage space. At the time of the visit, the Committee witnessed that the project was still at foundation level above surface with visible long pillars, with a lot of underground tunnels having been completed. 5.2.2 INSPECTION IN-LOCO: OXFORD AND FEDERATION BRIDGES: M2 BRIDGES Even though the Committee was advised that it was too dangerous to go closer to these projects, the CJMM and the Committee stopped for a few minutes to observe the projects from a distance. The construction of Oxford and Federation Bridges commenced on 13 November 2015 and was supposed to be completed on 30 July 2016. The contract value was reported to be R107 million. During the time of the visit, the project had not been completed and a new anticipated completion date was reported to be 15 October 2017. The overall progress of this project was reported to be 80 per cent against 85 per cent of time lapsed. The
MINUTES At a meeting of the Town Development Committee held in The Civic Centre, Trowbridge on Tuesday 5th December 2017 Present: Councillors: Bazan (Lambrok), Bridges (Park), Bryant (Paxcroft) (Vice-Chair), Fuller (Park), Kemp (Central),Kirk (Adcroft), & Whiffen (Grove) (Chair). Additional: Councillor Drewett Public: None Officers: Allan 5330 APOLOGIES a) Apologies were received from Cllr Beaver. b) RESOLVED to accept apologies with reasons from Cllr Beaver 5331 MINUTES a) RESOLVED to approve as a correct record the Minutes of the Town Development Committee meeting held on Tuesday 14th November 2017. b) There were no matters to note. 5332 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST RESOLVED to note Declarations of Interest in respect of matters contained in this agenda, in accordance with the provisions of the Local Government Act 1972 in respect of officers and of the Localism Act 2011 in respect of members. 5333 CHAIR'S ANNOUNCEMENTS None. 5334 OPEN FORUM None. 5335 PLANNING APPLICATIONS – NEW The meeting considered applications received from the Development Management (West) Department of Wiltshire Council and RESOLVED as follows: Application Number: 17/10745/FUL Site Location: 32 Marston Road Trowbridge Wiltshire BA14 0LU Applicant: Mr & Mrs A G Jameson Grid Ref: 385140 155912 Applicant Address: 32 Marston Road Trowbridge Wiltshire BA14 0LU Proposal: Proposed single storey extension to the principle elevation Case Officer: Verity Giles-Franklin NO OBJECTION Application Number: 17/11204/TPO Site Location: 5 Trowbridge Park Trowbridge Wiltshire BA14 6DL Applicant: Mr Patrick Cox Grid Ref: 386607 157665 Applicant Address: 5 Trowbridge Lodge Park Trowbridge Wiltshire BA14 6DL Proposal: Oak Tree - Fell Case Officer: David Wyatt OBJECTION: The reasons given fail to justify the felling of this tree.
Name___________________________________ Warm-up Review of Inverse Functions A one-to-one function (passes the horizontal and vertical line test) has an inverse function, which “undoes” or “reverses” the original function. The graph of a function’s inverse function can be found by reflecting over the line y = x. Example: Use the following table of select values of function f to answer the questions below. x -2 0 1 3 7 f(x) 0 3 12 5 -2 Find: Intro to Derivatives of Inverses For each problem on this page, find the equation of the tangent line at the given point. Then find the inverse and the equation of the tangent line to the inverse at the given point. 1. at x = 2 tangent line: at x = 4 tangent line: 2. at x = –4 tangent line:
Location: Candidate ID No: Qualifications Achieved Subjects Type of Qualification eg. Standard GCSE, Higher, BSc Grade Achieved Qualifications Currently Studying or Working Towards Subjects Type of Qualification eg. Standard Grade, GCSE, Higher, BSc Grade Anticipated Date Anticipated Membership of Professional or Regulatory Bodies Full name of organisation(s) Registration Number Renewal Date Job Reference No: PART C Candidate ID No: Present (or most recent) Post Job Title: Grade: Date of Starting Grade:
COOLAMON SHIRE COUNCIL PHOTOCOPYING POLICY Date Adopted 14 December 2017 Council Minute 235/12/2017 Version Version 5 Policy Responsibility Corporate & Community Services Review Timeframe Every 4 Years Last Review Date December 2017 Next Scheduled Review Date December 2021 POLICY STATEMENT That there be no charge for copying done for Non Profit/Community Organisations, the normal charge to apply for individuals subject to the discretion of the General Manager. Any applications for discount by private individuals where special circumstances may exist to be referred to Council for its consideration. REVIEW This policy may be reviewed at any time or as required in the event of legislative changes. Unless otherwise required the policy will be reviewed at least once during a term of Council Version 4 Adopted: Council Meeting held 14 December 2017 (Minute No 235/12/2017) Version 3 Adopted: Council Meeting held 16 December 2008 (Minute No. 359/12/2008) Version 2 Adopted: Council Meeting held 16 August 2007 (Minute No. 261/8/2007) Version 1 Adopted Council Meeting held 19 August 2004 (Minute No. 277/8/2004)
June 19, 2017 – Board of Governors Approves Trent Research & Innovation Park Master Plan The Master Plan informs the 85-acre land development partnership between the City of Peterborough and Trent University and comprises six key design principles: 1. Campus integration; 2. Fostering of innovation community culture; 3. Sustainable design; 4. Landscape-led design strategy; 5. Flexibility to accommodate a range of enterprises and uses; and 6. City and region connection. July 10, 2017 – Consultation with Curve Lake First Nation A Trent delegation travelled to Curve Lake First Nation to discuss the Trent Research & Innovation Park. July 11, 2017 – Consultation with Mohawks of the Bay of Quinte-Tyendinaga A delegation travelled to Mohawks of the Bay of Quinte-Tyendinaga to discuss the Trent Research & Innovation Park. July 17, 2017 – Consultation with Hiawatha First Nation A delegation travelled to Hiawatha First Nation to discuss the Trent Research & Innovation Park. July 17, 2017 – Consultation with the Peterborough & District Métis Council + Métis Nation of Ontario A Trent delegation travelled to Peterborough & District Métis Council + Métis Nation of Ontario to discuss the Trent Research & Innovation Park. July 17, 2017 – City Council Planning Committee Reviews Draft Plan of Subdivision and Trent Research & Innovation Park Master Plan Approval at committee level elevates TRIP Master Plan for review at the next City Council meeting. July 20, 2017 – Consultation with Nogojiwanong Friendship Centre Urban Aboriginal A Trent delegation travelled to Nogojiwanong Friendship Centre Urban Aboriginal to discuss the Trent Research & Innovation Park. July 20, 2017 – Consultation with Alderville First Nation A delegation travelled to Alderville First Nation to discuss the Trent Research & Innovation Park July 31, 2017 – City Council Approves Trent Research & Innovation Park Master Plan August 18, 2017 – Consultation with Mississaugas of Scugog First Nation A Trent delegation travelled to Mississaugas of Scugog First Nation to discuss the Trent Research & Innovation Park. September 15, 2017 – Land Symposium Representatives from Trent University, the City of Peterborough and regional First Nations gathered at Trent for a symposium about the land. December 7, 2017 – Cleantech Commons at Trent University Launched The Research & Innovation Park is officially branded Cleantech Commons at Trent University.
Q5 Which bridge construction option do you prefer? Further explanations of each bridge option can be found in the brochure and at: https://consultations.gov.wales/a55-3rd-menai-crossing Extrados one-span Extrados two-span Balanced cantilever Do nothing Don’t know First Choice (select one option) Second choice (select one option) Q6 Please explain your reasons for the highway and bridge combination that you have selected. About you Q7 Which of the following best describes you? (tick all that apply) Resident in Gwynedd area Business owner on Anglesey Business in Gwynedd area Student on Anglesey Student in Gwynedd area I travel to work on Anglesey I travel to work in Gwynedd Other (please specify) Resident on Anglesey I do not live or own a business in this area but I travel though it regularly Q8 Are you? Male Female Prefer not to say Q9 Please indicate age band you are in Under 18 35-44 65-74 18-24 45-54 75+ 25-34 55-64 Prefer not to say Q10 What is your home postcode? This will only be used for mapping purposes; you will not be contacted. Further comments Q11 If you have any further comments on the study, please write them below. Thank you. Please return this questionnaire to a member of the project team at the exhibition. Alternatively you can complete it on-line at https://consultations.gov.wales/a55-3rd-menai-crossing or post it to FREEPOST, Welsh Government, Sarn Mynach, Llandudno Junction, Conwy. LL31 9RZ. The deadline for receipt of questionnaires is Friday 9th March 2018.
travel to 55 per cent of other African countries. They can get visas on arrival in only 25 per cent of other countries. One of the seven overarching aspirations outlined in Agenda 2063 is “an integrated continent, politically united, based on the ideals of Pan-Africanism and the vision of Africa’s Renaissance”. The clauses that unpack this aspiration (22 and 23) mention free movement twice, locating it at the heart of political and economic regional integration. On clause 67(K) the AU Agenda 2063 goes on to call for action to introduce an African passport, issued by member states, capitalising on the global migration towards e-passports, and with the abolishment of visa requirements for all African citizens in all African countries by 2018. SOUTH AFRICAN POSITION ON THE AU AGENDA 2063 South Africa supports the development objectives and aims of Agenda 2063 in the context of strengthening the African cooperation, integration and for promoting inclusive development, peace and security. The support for the Agenda 2063 is informed by the understanding that South Africa’s destiny is intricately linked to that of the continent. Regional and continental integration are the foundation for Africa’s socio-economic development and political unity, and essential for South Africa’s prosperity and security. South Africa fully supports the principle of free movement on the Continent, including the need for the AU to conclude a protocol to facilitate such free movement. This is also in line with the National Development Plan which states that South Africa needs to adopt a much more progressive migration policy. The country recently adopted a new White Paper on International Migration which advocates for an Afrocentric migration approach. AU PROTOCOL RELATING TO FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS Background The AU Draft Protocol is a Protocol to the Treaty Establishing the African Economic Community Relating to Free Movement of Persons, Right of Residence and Right of
SDG&E proposes that in 3 Sub-section 2 of the Distribution Resource Planning proceeding, the Commission will examine specific technologies that the IOUs may need to manage and accommodate DERs throughout their systems and whether to establish guidelines to govern utilities’ proposed grid modernization investments in the future. SDG&E noted that Track 3 Sub-section 2 will identify the types and functions of technologies, including those related to communications that will enable greater DER penetration on the electrical distribution grid. SCE and PG&E both submitted comments in support of further exploration of the role of telecommunications in grid integration. Next Steps Include Asking More Questions We agree with SDG&E that this topic of data transportation, data transportation access, and principles under which to evaluate communications-related expenditures by investor-owned electric utilities falls within R.14-08-013 Track 3 Sub-track 2: Grid Modernization Investment Guidance. That sub-track is focused on identifying the types and functions of technologies, including those related to communications, that will enable greater DER penetration on the electrical distribution grid. We refer this topic for inclusion in R.14-08-013 Track 3 Sub-track 2 through the appropriate process. We agree with SCE and PG&E that this topic should fall under the Distributed Energy Resources Action Plan. Watershed Management for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction, Optimized Water and Energy Resources, Utility Infrastructure Protection Improved management of California’s forested watersheds provides multiple benefits, including water-quality improvement, increased water yield
Kindergarten Sight Words I 21. for can 22. have the 23. of we 24. they see 25. said a 26. want like 27. here to 28. me and 29. this go 30. what you 31. help do 32. too my 33. has are 34. play he 35. look with 36. where is 37. good little 38. who she 39. come was 40. does
SED/RTSB/EIM/RNC/DAR/SCA/NST/DK3/vdl PROP. RES. Agenda ID# 15431 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF Safety and Enforcement Division Rail Transit Safety Branch Resolution ST-197 January 19, 2017 RESOLUTION RESOLUTION ST-197 GRANTING APPROVAL OF THE ANGELS FLIGHT RAILWAY FOUNDATION 2016/17 Restoration and Refurbishment Project Safety Certification Plan SUMMARY This Resolution grants the Angels Flight Railway Foundation’s request for approval of the Safety Certification Plan for the 2016/17 Restoration and Refurbishment Project. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Angels Flight Railway Foundation (AFRF) is submitting to the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) a Safety Certification Plan (SCP) which addresses the requirements listed in CPUC Resolution ST-170 (dated February 12, 2015), ordering the Angels Flight Railway Company to file a Safety Certification Plan and a Safety Certification Verification Report under the provisions of General Order 164-D. CPUC Resolution ST-170 requires AFRF to submit an SCP certifying all major project work performed on the system since the September 5, 2013 derailment, which includes: Safety Rope Carrier Brake Track and Wheel Wear Standard Operation Procedure Failsafe Ensuring Safety System Controls are not Bypassed
I am a hospitality lecturer at City of Bristol college and am organising the first ResearchMeet for the new local LSRN network on Wednesday 21st March, 5.30pm at City of Bristol College. The aim is to encourage discussion around evidence-based practice and encourage practitioner research. If you would like to attend or maybe present a new idea or strategy you have been implementing, please contact me: My research interests are around teaching and learning and work experience/employer engagement. I specialise in events management, food service, nutrition and sustainable development. I was encouraged to get involved with LSRN after regularly contributing to #UKFEChat on Twitter (see below) LSRN London and South East Next session The next session will be on 15th December 2017 at 13:30 – 16:30 (the event will run from 14:00 – 16:00) Presentations and speakers include: Ms Jacqueline McFarlane-Fraser, African Caribbean Women Development Centre, London: 'Critical pedagogy, competence and transformative learning pathways of mature black women learners into work' by Dr Fuad Ali, University of East London. ‘The Omnibus Learning Gain Study: Towards inclusive metrics in HE’ Professor Stephan Schumann, University of Konstanz (Germany) ‘Teacher Education for VET-Schools in Germany: Past, Present and Future Challenges’ Dr Sai Loo, UCL Institute of Education, University College London. ‘Teachers and Teaching in Vocational and Professional Education’ Dr Norman Crowther, National Education Union. ‘Vocational Embodiment: a new focus for FE teachers?’ Venue: University of East London, Stratford Campus, Water Lane, London, E15 4LZ. Cass School of Education & Communities, Room: ED.2.02, Centre for Vocational Education Research (CVER), LSE Nest seminar CVER runs a seminar series to which all are welcome. External/Non-LSE visitors are required to register for this event by emailing The next seminar is on Wednesday 3 December 2017 14:00 - 15:30 at 32L 1.04, 1st Floor Conference Room, LSE, 32 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PH
SECTION D-10– PROGRAM EVALUATION (MAXIMUM 25 points) Instructions: Bidder’s response to the questions in this Section D-10 documents how Bidder meets the requirements and qualifications to provide the services set forth in Attachment A – Sample Contract. All questions must be responded to and will be scored. Failure to respond or demonstrate how the requirements/qualifications are met may cause Bidder to be deemed unresponsive and may be disqualified. Please ensure that your answers to these questions include all information that you wish DSHS to consider in determining whether you meet the requirements and qualifications set forth in the Solicitation Document. # Requirements/ Qualifications: MAXIMUM TOTAL POINTS FOR EVALUATION PURPOSES ONLY Bidders must submit a proposal, which addresses quality and quantitative measures of successes and outcomes of services identified for funding in this RFQ. Bidders must respond to the following questions. 25 1 Describe how your agency will demonstrate that their program is successful in improving family functioning as measured by short term, intermediate or long-term outcomes using evidence based tools. RESPONSE: 2 Describe the assessment tools used to measure the success of services provided by Family Mentoring program, including client impact, outcomes and qualitative and quantitative data collection. RESPONSE: 3 Explain your agency’s quality improvement system to measure child’s language acquisition benchmarks, social & emotional development and literacy development? RESPONSE:
SECTION D-6 – COST PROPOSAL (SCORED) Instructions: The Bidder must provide a detailed budget by completing the Cost Proposal. The Prime Bidder may submit a single budget proposal that includes all of their Coalition Partner’s budget(s) or they may provide a separate budget Proposal for each Coalition Partner. If separate budgets are submitted, the Prime Bidder must still provide a total budget summary. The total number of available points is 30 points. BUDGET SUMMARY: The following is to be completed using the totals from the budget categories A-E. Enter the totals from all expenditure categories in the application spaces. All amounts in the budget section are to be rounded to the nearest whole dollar. Expenditure Category Total FY18 Totals FY19 Totals Personnel Salaries Personnel Benefits Operating Expenses Contractors Equipment Subtotal Administrative (maximum of 4% of subtotals from A-E) Grand Total B. BUDGET DETAILS: This section of the budget includes a for each major category of potential expenditure. Please itemize your proposed expenditures in each of the following categories: Personnel, Operating Expenses, Contractual, Equipment, and Administrative Expenses. Category A – PERSONNEL
# Response Requirements Checklist: Included: YES/NO 1 Bid Submission Letter is attached, containing required elements and responses per Section C.1.a. – “Bid Submission Letter Sample – Attachment E” 2 Attachment B - Bidder’s Certification and Assurances form is signed and attached. This Attachment C-1 – Bidder Response Form: 3 Section D-2 – Minimum Qualifications Response completed. 4 Section D-3 – Technical Qualifications Response completed. 5 Section D-4 – Management, Experience/Qualifications Response completed 6 Section D-5 – Bidder’s References identified.
Community-based Mental Health/Suicide Prevention Services Action Plan Template* State Fiscal Year 2018 This template is for use with the State Fiscal Year 2018 DSHS/DBHR Community-based Mental Health Promotion/Suicide Prevention Services grant application. Organization Name: Date Submitted: Goal: Objective: Risk/Protective Factor(s): For assistance using this template please contact the DBHR Prevention Training Team at . This form is locked for filling in form functions, but is not password protected. If you need to add rows, feel free to un-restrict the editing protection and make your edits. Action Plan: Services through June 30, 2018: Program/ Strategy Community Name Will you be able to begin services by 1/16/17 How Often When Who & How Many Lead Responsible Party (ies) Name of program/ strategy Name of community(ies) this program will serve Yes or No? How many groups will be offered? List all of the implementation months of the program Who is this service for? How many people reached? Organization delivering program? Who is making sure this gets done?
content delivery networks. “Offering a rich portfolio of proven AoIP solutions, Digigram is positioned to be a key enabler of the IP transition in South Korea,” said Jérémie Weber, CEO at Digigram. “Soundfox International will help us boost our presence in the country’s broadcast market and reach more customers interested in IP. For area broadcasters, improved access to innovative AoIP solutions will help them in making a flexible, cost-effective IP transition.” Additional information about Soundfox International is available at . Further information about Digigram and the company’s products is available at or by phone at +33 4 76 52 47 47. # # # About Digigram Digigram develops mission-critical solutions dedicated to the contribution, production, and safe distribution of audio content. Digigram sound cards, IP audio codec solutions, cloud applications, and networking infrastructure are used in thousands of broadcast, AV, and industrial applications all over the world. Robust and easy to use, Digigram solutions add value to users’ operations. Digigram (DIG) is publicly listed on the NYSE Euronext Paris stock exchange. More information about market-leading Digigram audio-over-IP solutions is available at . All trademarks appearing herein are the property of their respective owners. Link to Word Doc: Photo Link: Photo Caption: Soundfox International Logo Photo Link: Photo Caption: IQOYA *LINK MPX-Over-IP Software Option for STL Codec Photo Link: Photo Caption: IQOYA *SERV/LINK Multichannel Audio-Over-IP Codec Agency Contact: Laila Bishay Wall Street Communications Tel: +44 1332 865 332 Email: laila@wallstcom.com Digigram Contact: Clarisse Modena Field Marketing and Communications Manager Tel: +33 (0) 47 652 53 01 modena@digigram.com
SDG&E Phase 2 filed January 2018 Evaluate TOU Base periods, but no changes to Base periods unless dead band triggered SCE Phase 2 rate design completed April 2018 No changes to TOU periods unless dead band triggered Residential RDW TOU rates implemented per D.15-07-001 2019 (rolling); Residential Default TOU implemented (strive for no changes to TOU periods until 2024) PG&E Phase 2 filed January 2019 Evaluate Base TOU periods against dead band SDG&E Phase 2 completed 2019 No changes to TOU periods unless dead band triggered SCE Phase 2 filed January 2020 New Base TOU periods proposed PG&E Phase 2 completed April 2020 No changes to TOU periods unless dead band triggered SDG&E Phase 2 filed January 2021 New Base TOU periods proposed SCE Phase 2 completed April 2021 New Base TOU periods adopted PG&E 2 filed January 2022 New Base TOU periods proposed SDG&E Phase 2 completed April 2022 New Base TOU periods adopted End of legacy periods for residential customers covered by this decision June 30, 2022 SCE Phase 2 filed January 2023 Evaluate Base TOU periods against dead band PG&E Phase 2 completed April 2023 New Base TOU periods adopted End of legacy periods customers covered by this decision June 30, 2027
Component Request 2014 Ex-Post Savings $1,937,665 2015 Ex-Ante Savings $1,563,003 2015 Ex-Ante Review Performance $1,137,075 2015 Codes & Standards $97,416 2015 Non-Resource $315,451 2014 Ex-Ante Savings True Up $45,341 2014 Ex-Ante Review Performance True Up - 2014 Codes & Standards True Up ($6,165) 2014 Non-Resource True Up ($2,002) 2006-2008 RRIM Adjustment - Total Request $5,087,784 Table 9: SDG&E 2016 ESPI Claim as Filed in SDG&E AL2950-E-A/2511-G-A 3.1 Energy Efficiency Resource Savings 2014 Ex-Post Energy Savings ESPI Component Request Award 2014 Ex-Post Savings $1,937,665 $1,937,665 2015 Ex-Ante Energy Savings ESPI Component 2015 Cap Request Award 2015 Ex-Ante Savings $7,308,445 $1,563,003 $794,155 3.2 Ex-Ante Review (EAR) Process Performance For the 2015 workpaper review assessment, Commission staff continued to observe a high level of SDG&E staff activity oriented toward improving the overall quality of workpapers and accompanying ex-ante data submissions as well as streamlining the review process. However, with the exception of a
2014 Ex-Ante Review Performance True Up - - 2014 Codes & Standards True Up ($6,165) ($6,646) 2014 Non-Resource True Up ($2,002) ($2,158) SDG&E’s final 2016 ESPI award values including all adjustments are shown below: Component Award 2014 Ex-Post Savings $1,937,665 2015 Ex-Ante Savings $794,155 2015 Ex-Ante Review Performance $848,062 2015 Codes & Standards $97,416 2015 Non-Resource $186,878 2014 Ex-Ante Savings True Up $48,873 2014 Ex-Ante Review Performance True Up - 2014 Codes & Standards True Up ($6,646) 2014 Non-Resource True Up ($2,158) 2006-2008 RRIM Settlement Adjustment - Award $3,904,245 Table 10: SDG&E 2016 ESPI awards This award is $1,183,539 less than SDG&E’s request in AL2950-E-A/2511-G-A. Sothern California Gas (SCG) SCG requests $4,048,696 in their 2016 ESPI AL submission as detailed below: Component Request 2014 Ex-Post Savings $2,029,846 2015 Ex-Ante Savings $1,024,615 2015 Ex-Ante Review Performance $600,299 2015 Codes & Standards $59,009 2015 Non-Resource $337,278 2014 Ex-Ante Savings True Up $221
The 13th International Conference on Waste Management and Technology (ICWMT 13) © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. Peer-review responsibility of Tsinghua University/ Basel Convention Regional Centre for Asia and the Pacific. Keywords:
Onki Kwan 2014 13.5 $215 D1510047 $2902.50 13.50 215.00 $2,902.50 Onki Kwan 2015 45 $250 ALJ-308 $11,250 45.00 215.00 See D.15-10-047. $9,675.00 Onki Kwan 2016 25.9 $305 ALJ-329 $7,899.50 25.90 220.00 See Res. $5,698.00 Guy Noyes 2014 8.16 $130 D1510047 $1060.80 8.16 100.00 See Res. ALJ-303. [1] $816.00 Guy 2015 10.32 $130 D1510047 $1341.60 10.32 100.00 See Res. ALJ-308 $1,032.00 Guy 2016 5 $165 ALJ-329 $825.00 5.00 165.00 See Res. ALJ-329. $825.00 Subtotal: $25,279.40 Subtotal: $20,948.50 FEES Describe here what OTHER HOURLY FEES you are Claiming (paralegal, travel **, etc.): Item Year Hours Rate $ for Rate* Total $ Hours Rate Total $ Onki Kwan 2015 0.5 $125 Travel time for hearings – half hourly rate $62.50 00.00 [2] 107.50 $00.00 Onki Kwan 2016 0.5 $152.5 Travel time for hearings – half hourly rate $76.25 00.00 110.00 $00.00 Guy Noyes 2015 0.5 $65 Travel time for hearings – half hourly rate $32.50 00.00 50.00 $00.00 Guy Noyes 2016 0.5 $82.5 Travel time for hearings – half hourly rate $41.25 00.00 82.50 $00.00 Subtotal: $212.50 Subtotal: $00.00
L. Jan Reid, Expert & Advocate 2011 28.8 $200.00 D.12-06-011, Appendix, Resolutions ALJ281 and ALJ287 $5,760 28.8 $185.00 $5,328.00 L. Jan Reid, Expert & Advocate 2012 72.4 $200.00 D.12-06-011, Appendix, Resolutions ALJ281 and ALJ287 $14,480 70.9 $200.00 $14,180.00 L. Jan Reid, Expert & Advocate 2013 70.1 $215.00 D.12-06-011, Appendix, Resolutions ALJ281 and ALJ287 $15,071.50 67.4 $215.00 $14,491.00 Subtotal: $35,311.50 Subtotal: $33,999.00 INTERVENOR COMPENSATION CLAIM PREPARATION ** Item Year Hours Rate $ for Rate* Total $ Rate Total $ L. Jan Reid, Expert & Advocate 2013 4.5 $107.50 D.12-06-011, Appendix, Resolutions ALJ281 and ALJ287 $483.75 4.5 $107.50 $483.75 Subtotal: $483.75 Subtotal: $483.75 TOTAL AWARD: $34,482.75 **We remind all intervenors that Commission staff may audit their records related to the award and that intervenors must make and retain adequate accounting and other documentation to support all claims for intervenor compensation. Claimant’s records should identify specific issues for which it seeks compensation, the actual time spent by each employee or consultant, the applicable hourly rates, fees paid to consultants and any other costs for which compensation was claimed. The records pertaining to an award of compensation shall be retained for at least three years from the date of the final decision making the award. ** Reasonable Claim preparation time typically compensated at ½ of preparer’s normal hourly rate. Application for Rehearing pf D.15-09-018 Item Year Hours Rate $ Basis for Rate* Total $ Hours Rate Total $ L. Jan Reid, Expert & Advocate 2015 7.6 $220.00 Resolution ALJ303 $1,672.00 5.7 $220.00 $1,254.00
APPENDIX Compensation Decision Summary Information Compensation Decision: D1612057 Modifies Decision? Yes (supersedes D.15-09-018) Contribution Decision(s): N/A Proceeding(s): R1203014; R1005006 Author: ALJ Fitch Payer(s): Pacific Gas and Electric Company Intervenor Information Intervenor Claim Date Amount Requested Amount Awarded Multiplier? Reason Change/Disallowance L. Jan Reid 11/1/13 $35,795.25 $34,482.75 N/A Failure to make substantial contribution to disposition of two advice letters; hourly rate. L. Jan Reid 10/21/15 $1,672.00 $1,254.00 N/A Applying rejection in part. Advocate Information First Name Last Name Type Intervenor Hourly Fee Requested Year Hourly Fee Hourly Fee Adopted L. Jan Reid Expert L. Jan Reid $200.00 2011 $185.00 L. Jan Reid Expert L. Jan Reid $200.00 2012 $200.00 L. Jan Reid Expert L. Jan Reid $215.00 2013 $215.00 L. Jan Reid Expert L. Jan Reid $220.00 2015 $220.00 (END OF APPENDIX)
argued that SoCalGas shareholders, not ratepayers, should be responsible for funding for the ME&O effort directed in response to the gas leak at Aliso Canyon. CforAT, in conjunction with Greenlining, supported allocating funding (from shareholders) for paid support for Flex Alert. CforAT and Greenlining specifically noted the distinction between “effective” and outreach and argued that the unique nature of the response to the Aliso Canyon leak supported action that may be “effective” regardless of whether it is “cost effective.” CforAT, in conjunction with Greenlining, recommended a paid media budget for Flex Alert of $5M, which is proportional to SCE’s share of the prior year’s budget, to be targeted to those areas in southern California where generation capacity was likely to be impacted. The Commission declined to approve SoCalGas’ proposal to fund ME&O in response to the Canyon gas leak from ratepayer funds, instead authorizing establishment of a memorandum account for future review. Aliso Canyon Decision at pp. 21-22 and p. 31 (OP 7); see also CforAT/Greenlining Comments on Aliso Canyon Ruling, filed on March 25, 2016, at pp. 5-6. The Commission cited with approval CforAT and Greenlining’s argument about the distinction between effective and cost-effective outreach in its decision to support paid media advertising for the Flex Alert program. Aliso Canyon Decision at p. 18; see also CforAT/Greenlining Comments on Aliso Canyon Ruling at pp. 2-3. The Commission approved a budget of $5M to support paid Flex Alert advertising in the areas of California affected by the gas leak. Aliso Canyon Decision at pp. 18 and 30 (OP 1); see also CforAT/Greenlining Comments on Aliso Canyon Ruling at pp. 2-3. This authorization was due to the specific situation based on the of Aliso Canyon, and is separate from the general determination in D.15-11-033 that
CLASS ACTIVITIES ASSIGNMENTS PROJECTS OBJECTIVE VII LISTENING comprehension COLLECT INFORMATION ABOUT ANTS- THEIR TYPES, WHERE THEY LIVE, THEIR FOOD, THE JOBS THEY DO,( PASTE RELEVANT PICTURES AND WRITE THE INFORMATION IN SPIRAL NOTES A4 SIZE PAPER 2. ONE PAGE CURSIVE WRITING EVERYDAY WRITE ONE VALUE BASED STORY FROM PANCHATANTRA AND PASTE RELEVANT PICTURES----ON A4 SIZE PAPER 2.COLLECT 5 POEMS BSED ON ANIMALS, WRITE AND LEARN THEM TO IMPROVE EXPRESSION, WRITING, AND TO ENABLE THEM TO INCULCATE VALUES SPEAKING Narration, Recitation,role play,speech,group discussion, reading,singing READING comprehension WRITING Paragraphs, notice, letters, biosketch,stories,grammar SANSKRIT HOME WORK
>>>> , Age 68 >>>> , Age 68 >>>> , Age 68 >>>> , Age 68 >>>> , Age 60 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> , Age 68 >> >> > , Age 49 >> , Age 49 >> , Age 49 >> , Age 49 >> , Age 49 >> , Age 49 >> , Age 49 >> , Age 49 >> , Age 49 >> , Age 49 >> , Age 49 >> , Age 49 >> , Age 49 >> , Age 49 >> , Age 49 >> , Age 49 >> , Age 77 >>> , Age 77 >>> , Age 77 >>> , Age 77 >>> , Age 77 >>> , Age 77 >>> , Age 77 >>> , Age 77 >>> , Age 77 >>> , Age 77 >>> , Age 77 >>> , Age 85 >>>> , Age 85 >>>> , Age 85 >>>> , Age 85 >>>> , Age 85 >>>> , Age 85 >>>> , Age 85 >>>> , Age 85 >>>> , Age 85 >>>> , Age 85 >>>> , Age 85 >>>> , Age 85 >>>> , Age 85 >>> , Age 44 >>>> , Age 44 >>>> , Age 44 >>>> , Age 44
8 Lead Length 1000 mm 9 Accessories: (standard/optional) Mating connectors for 4-wire PRT Instruction Manual Traceable Calibration Certificate (ISO 17025) 4. PORTABLE METROLOGY WELL/DRY BLOCK 1 Temperature range at 23 °C –95 °C to 140 °C 2 Accuracy ± 0.05 °C full range 3 Stability ± 0.015 °C full range 4 Axial uniformity ± 0.05 °C full range 5 Radial gradient ±0.01 °C full range 6 Immersion (well) 160 mm or more 7 Power requirements 200 V to 230 V (± 10 %) 50Hz 8 PROCESS ELECTRONICS OPTIONAL 9 Accessories: (standard/optional) Instruction Manual Traceable Calibration Certificate (ISO 5. PORTABLE IR THERMOMETER CALIBRATOR/IR SOURCE -LOW TEMPERATURE 1 Temperature range –30 °C to 150 °C at 23 °C ambient 2 Accuracy ± 0.4 °C 3 Stability ± 0.1 °C 4 Target Emissivity ≥ 0.95 (± 0.02 from 8 to 14 µm) 5 Resolution 0.1 °C 6 Power 230 V ac (± 10%), 5 A,50Hz 7 Accessories: (standard/optional) Instruction Manual Traceable Calibration Certificate (ISO 17025)
X. Similar Orders Executed Sl. No. Description Name & Postal Address Phone Value of order Delivery date as per Contract Actual Date Note: Copies of purchase order/completion certificate for the above supply to be enclosed. Later 5 years need to be indicated here. Name & Designation Place: Date: Authorized Signature Office Seal
Terms and conditions We accept all terms and conditions listed in the Tender Documents. Company’s Rubber stamp: Place: Date: For Indigenous Supply Sl No Item description Qty. Unit Rate (Rs.) Amount (Rs.) 1 TEMPERATURE READOUT 01 No. 2 REFERENCE TC 01 No. 3 REFERENCE RTD 01 No. 4 PORTABLE METROLOGY WELL/DRY BLOCK 01 No. 5 PORTABLE IR THERMOMETER CALIBRATOR/IR SOURCE- LOW TEMPERATURE 01 No. 6 PORTABLE IR THERMOMETER CALIBRATOR/IR SOURCE-HIGH TEMPERATURE 01 No. 7 IR THERMOMETER 01 No. 8 Packing & Forwarding charges, if any 9 GST 10 Transportation charges 11 Insurance
the school will take to provide materials and training to help parents work with their child to improve their child’s academic achievement [Section 1118(e)(2)]. Count Content/ Type of Activity Person Responsible Correlation to Student Achievement Timeline Evidence of Effectiveness 1 Curriculum Day/Night Classroom Teacher Increased awareness and expectations in all domains of general education, ESE, and ESOL populations September 2017 Collaboration building relationships within the community 2 SAC (School Advisory Council) TWE SAC Committee Improved community awareness of and activities of the student population September 2017 Parents and the community collaborate to address and meet the needs of the student population. 3 SAF (School Advisory Forum) TWE Staff Increased community awareness for parents and the community. September 2017 Parents and the community collaborate to address and meet the needs of the school and the community. 4 5 Parent Conferences Individual TWE Teachers Increased awareness for parents in understanding student progress September 2017 Teachers collaborate with parents to develop academic and social plans for successful outcomes for students
Employee Name Employee ID Number Direct Supervisor Name: Campus Name: Department Name: Timekeeper Name: Phone Number: Element Name: Human Capital Management-Compensation Supplemental Extra Duty Timecard DAY DATE TIME IN TIME OUT TOTAL HRS INITIALS Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Employee Signature: Direct Supervisor Signature: Compensation Approval Date: Total Hours Rate MICHAEL HINOJOSA, ED.D. SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS
AU1 AU2 SP1 SP2 SU1 SU2 Y1 What makes a bear grizzly? What happened to the dinosaurs? Which version of a story do you prefer and why? How would you catch a star? What are the characteristics of a hero or villain? How do animals survive in a desert, at the North Pole or in a rainforest? Y2 What is Stoke On Trent famous for? What is your favourite read? What is it like in another location? Macbeth What is your favourite British meal? What would you find in a deep, dark wood? Y3 What could you design? Are forces necessary? What can we from the past? (Stone Age) Macbeth Is it ok to eat plants and animals? Why is better than the seaside? Y4 What causes the spark? Who were the impressionists? Why did Caesar meet a sticky end? Why do we need water cycles? Who’s the power behind Macbeth? What’s life like as a potter? Y5 What does it mean to go on a journey? What qualities make a good leader? What lies within the Amazon? What came first the chicken or the egg ? How is Macbeth influemced? What does it take to be w winner? Y6 What’s your perspective? What was so great about the Great War? How did we get here? Who’s got the power? SATS revision and pupil led theme ? How do we celebrate?
frogs, birds, snakes, jaguar, monkeys, insects grass, shrubs, Joshua trees Fauna- kangaroos, kangaroo rats, snakes, arachnids, lizards, wallabies, camels , most are nocturnal Fauna-squirrels, red fox, deer, birds, snakes, lizards, bears, raccoons, opossum shrubs, & wildflowers Fauna-caribou, polar bear, snowshoe hare, snowy owl, arctic fox, wolves Location Near the equator, America, Congo, Indonesia, Northern Australia Near grasslands, Sahara, Mojave, Australia Middle latitudes, Eastern US, European, Japan Northernmost arctic Precipitation Up to 400cm/157 in <25 cm/ 10 in 75-125 cm/ 29-49 in 30-50 cm/ 12-20 in Temperature 20-34 ⁰C 68-92 ⁰F 7-38⁰C 45-100⁰F *4 seasons* 6-28⁰C 43-82⁰F -26-12⁰C -15-54⁰F *coldest biome; cold & relatively dry Permanent layer of frozen soil found in tundras. Different salinity levels of aquatic habitats Marine (highest salinity), freshwater (very low salinity) and estuaries (a mix of salt and freshwater/brackish) Why plants on the forest floor have broad leaves Capture sunlight How to analyze a climatogram Precipitation is characterized by bar graphs, temperature is characterized by line graphs Cells:
ARTIST / ART WORKERS DETAILS List the artists and art workers involved DETAILS SALARIES / FEES TRAVEL EXPENSES ATTACH QUOTE Name Area of Expertise Base Location Rate of pay ($/hr, $/day or $/week) fee $ Amount to be funded by RADF (65%) Total cost of travel Amount to be funded by RADF (65%) (Fees and travel) (transfer these totals to Project budget)
previously produced Number of of experience in proof reading and editing 20 0 - 2 years experience >2 -3 years experience >3-4 years experience >4-6 experience >6 years experience Number of contactable references in respect of production, proofreading and creation of multimedia presentations 15 2 4 6 8 10 Financial position 10 Financial Statements for 1 year; Net Asset Position Positive cash flow Net profit position Financial Statements for 2 years; Net Asset Position Positive cash flow Net profit position Financial Statements for 3 Net Position Positive cash flow Net profit position Financial Statements for 4 years; Net Asset Position Positive cash flow Net profit position Financial Statements for more than 4 years; The Bidder’s information will be scored according to the following points system: Functionality Maximum Point Achievable Minimum Threshold Technical Functionality Evaluation Criteria 85 62.5 Multimedia Presentation and On-site Reference Checks 15 7.5 Overall Combined Points 100 70
Overview: The goal of grading and reporting is to provide the students with feedback that reflects their progress toward the mastery of the indicators and objectives found in the Reading Curriculum Framework Progress Guide. Factors Brief Description Reading Brief Description Oral/Written Communication Grade Percentage Each Per Quarter Class Work This includes work completed in the classroom setting. Class work can include, but is not limited to: Participation participation in whole/ small group discussions of class room assignments, including independent reading This includes work completed in the classroom setting. Class work can include, but is not limited to: Participation assignments process pieces of classroom assignments 35% Homework This includes all work completed outside the classroom to be graded on its completion and student’s preparation for class (materials, supplies, etc.) Assignments can include, but are not limited to: Logs assignments Break Packets This includes all work completed outside the classroom to be graded on its completion and student’s preparation for class (materials, supplies, etc.) Assignments can include, but are not limited to: assignments assignments 15% Assessments This category encompasses both the traditional (exams and quizzes) and alternative methods of assessing student learning with the goal of mastery (presentations, projects, portfolios, completion of graphic organizers, anecdotal notes of teacher observations, teacher conferences, student written responses) Assessments can include, but are not limited to: Writing Assessment Strategy and Standard Application presentations This category encompasses both the traditional (exams and quizzes) and alternative methods of assessing student learning with the goal of mastery (presentations, projects, portfolios). Assessments can include, but are not limited to: of Writing assignments Test writing 50%
3. Communications and Announcements: 4. AP&P Subcommittee Business: -AIT -Review AP&P Policy Tracking Draft 7. APM TBA (Graduation Honors) (ASG) 8. APM 339 (Final Exams) (ASG) 9. APM TBA (Policy on Culminating Experience) [Found no other policy to add this too. Thus AP&P needs to Draft a policy.]
Theme 1: Interaction between humans and the environment Theme 2: Development and interactions of cultures Theme 3: State-building, expansion and conflict Theme 4: Creation, expansion, and interaction of economic systems 5: Development and transformation of social structures Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 How does identifying the themes aid in your overall understanding of the impact Water played in civilizations?
Friday, February 21, 2017* Letter of Intent Send a short email or letter of your intent to apply to . Please also specify: Site contact during application process (including name, position, and phone number) Preferred date of application assistance conference call (see below) Number of AmeriCorps VISTA Members requested Quick summary of VISTA activities (1-2 sentences) Preferred due date of Cost (if May 5, 2017 poses a significant challenge). Cost Shares must be received no later than Friday, July 14, 201. *Contact Program Manager if interested in applying after this date. March 3, 2017 at 1 – 2pm March 14, 2017 at 2 – 3pm Application Assistance Conference Call All applicants are REQUIRED to participate in one of the technical assistance conference calls. Application assistance sessions will be held in a conference call/webinar format. Campus Compact of Oregon will be available to address specific applicant questions, as needed. Please don’t hesitate to contact Campus Compact should you have any questions regarding our VISTA program or this RFP. *If none of these dates work, you may request access to a pre-recorded session. March 24, 2017 at 5pm Proposal Due Date & Requirements Proposals must be emailed to with “host site nameVISTA Proposal” in the subject line. Please submit a separate application for each position for which you are applying. Fax will not be accepted. Submission includes: One complete proposal as PDF (including scanned versions of documents requiring a signature) AND One Word versions of page, narratives, VAD, and position description Friday, April 14, 2017 Award Notification Date Site Selection may be contingent upon the applicant providing additional information or making revisions and all placements are contingent upon CNCS approval and available funding. Thursday, April 20, 2017 at 10am- 4pm Site Supervisor Training Each site supervisor is REQUIRED to attend the orientation. Friday, May 5, 2017 Cost Share & MOU Due Date Placement sites that fail to pay the cost share and return the signed Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) by the due date may be subject to reallocation of the AmeriCorps VISTA Member position. If the due date of the Cost Share poses a significant challenge for your institution, please contact the VISTA Program Manager. Monday, May 8, 2017 Member Recruitment Launch Campus Compact of Oregon and all will launch national recruitment efforts for the 2017-2018 AmeriCorps VISTA team (pending approval from CNCS).
Friday, June 23, 2017 Member Recruitment Deadline (Selection and paperwork complete) End of August 2017 Member Begins at Host Site (Typically last week in August) Request for Proposal Page Campus Compact of Oregon 2017-2018 AmeriCorps Program VISTA Project Title: Institution/Organization: Host Site Tax ID/ EIN: Department: Mailing address: Address where VISTA will serve:
ORA questions the reasonableness of the Decision Tree. It argues that certain projects in the proceeding were handled and tracked differently from others, using Playa Del Rey and Lines 42-66-1 and 42-66-2 as examples of projects with “numerous” change orders and cost estimate revisions. In place of the current Decision Tree, ORA advocates for a universal Decision Tree that applies to all of Applicants’ pipeline safety enhancement projects. ORA also suggests that Applicants be required to provide an explanation at each point in the Decision Tree that leads to the final outcome of each set of project costs. 6.3.2. PSEP Design and Construction Standards and Practices Applicants assert that PSEP is subject to guidelines and oversight designed to comply with their internal standards as well as applicable laws, regulations, and Commission orders. These include Code of Federal Regulations, Title 49, Part 192, as well as the standards articulated by the American Society for Mechanical Engineers, American National Standards Institute, American Petroleum Institute, and American Society for Testing and Materials. 6.3.3. PSEP Oversight and Controls Applicants claim that the PSEP Organization implemented a process whereby each project was initially managed in compliance with their existing policies overseen by PSEP Organization leadership, and the later projects were overseen by the PSEP PMO and the Commission’s Safety and Enforcement Division (SED). Additionally—and in conformity with D.14-06-007’s mandate that SED exercise oversight authority in order to observe and inspect the testing, maintenance, and construction of the pipeline system and related