zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
ECC Table 1: Technical requirements Frequency Band Power / Magnetic Field Spectrum access and mitigation requirements Notes 76-77 GHz 30 dBm peak e.i.r.p. ≤ 56 %/s duty cycle 3 dBm/MHz average power spectral density. For obstacle detection radars for rotorcraft use.
Sardinia Radio Telescope 64 m Italy 39o29’34” 09o14’42” 600 On a valley partially surrounded by hills, no natural shields in North and West directions. Exposed to nearby roads. 4 March 2016 -- Noto 32 m Italy 14°59′20″ 90 Relatively isolated. More exposed in South and West directions. 4 March 2016 --
Zelenchukskaya, 32 m IAA RAS Russian Federation 43°47′16.2′′ 41°33′52.6′′ 1175 Broad flat plain exposed to roads 4 March 2016 -- Badary, 32 m IAA RAS Russian Federation 51°46′11.6′′ 102°14′04.95′′ 813 Relative isolated place 4 March 2016 -- Svetloe, 32 m IAA RAS Russian Federation 60°31′56′′ 29°46′54′′ 86 Broad flat plain exposed to roads 4 March 2016 -- Zelenchukskaya, 600 m SAO RAS Russian Federation 43°49′34.2′′ 41°35′12.06′′ 970 Broad flat plain exposed to roads 4 March 2016 -- Pushchino, 22 m Russian 54°49′22″ 190 Broad flat plain 4 March --
PRAO ASC LPI, RAS Federation 37°37′57′′ exposed to roads 2016 Kalyazin, 64 m Russian Federation 57°13′23′′ 37°54′01′′ 195 Relatively isolated place 4 March 2016 -- Ussurijsk, 70 m Russian Federation 44°0′57′′ 131°45′25′′ 20 Relatively isolated place 4 March 2016 -- Pico de Veleta, 30 m IRAM Spain 37o03’58” -03o23’34” 2850 Mountainside overlooking nearby ski resort, line of sight to city of Granada 4 March 2016 31 July 2016 1 August 2016 --
Examples Q.5 Define an organization & an extended organization? Answer: - Organization definition: - An organization is an individual or group of people that collaborate to achieve certain commercial goals. An organization is an entity comprising multiple people, such as an institution or an association, that has a collective goal and is linked to an external environment A social unit of people that is structured and managed to meet a need or to pursue collective goals. All organizations have a management structure that determines relationships between the different activities and the members, and subdivides and assigns roles, responsibilities, and authority to carry out different tasks. Organizations are open systems--they affect and are affected by their environment. Organizational structures usually have a leader and multiple layers of subordinates. In a functional organization, occupations are grouped together. In a divisional structure, each business unit conducts its own activities, such as sales, marketing and training. Most organizations are made up of departments such as R&D, marketing, procurement, engineering, planning, finance, sales, service, manufacturing, and distribution among others Organizations usually consider their employees to be one of the most important part of the organizations. Most successful organizations have found that it is crucial to involve their customers in the organization. They need constant input from their customers in order to identify their requirement and develop better and more innovation ways to meet those requirements. Example: - “McDonald’s”, McDonald's is the world's largest restaurant chain run by McDonald's Corporation. McDonald’s operating from 119 countries across approximately 36,615 outlets with 1.5 million employees. An extended organization definition: - An extended organization is a loosely coupled, self-organizing network of firms that combine their economic output to provide products and services offerings to the market. Firms in the extended enterprise may operate independently, for example, through market mechanisms, or cooperatively through agreements and contracts. They provide value added service or product to the OEM. Extended organization is the concept that a company does not operate in isolation because its success is dependent upon a network of partner relationships. The concept of extended organization was coined in 1990 at the Chrysler Corporation to explain the necessity for a collaborative relationship between supply chain members and focus attention on the competitive advantages the company felt could be gained when suppliers become partners.
SNARE AND ACCESSORIES ADJUDICATION SCRIPT 2018 Rudiments: Good Morning/Afternoon, I am your adjudicator. Please make yourself comfortable. First, we will begin with the buzz roll rudiment. *** Fill in the blank from the “roll” column in the CMEA Audition requirements. *** Now, please play the alternating flams rudiment. *** Fill in the blank from the “flams” column in the CMEA Audition requirements. *** Now, please play the paradiddle rudiment. *** Fill in the blank from the “paradiddle” column in the CMEA Audition requirements. *** Thank you. Please wait a moment. *** Fill in the “Rudiments” section both on the computer and paper backup *** *** Click “Save Current Score” *** Solo Audition: We will now listen to your solo piece. May I see the original copy (or proof of purchase, or PD copy) of your solo piece. *** If student does not have a legal copy, hear the audition, score the audition, and WRITE photocopy in the comments section*** Please begin your solo at measure ____ and perform to measure ____. ***Listen to solo*** Thank you. Please wait a moment. *** Fill in the “Solo Evaluation” section both on the computer and paper backup *** *** Click “Save Current Score” *** Sight Reading: We will now listen to you sight read; you will have 30 seconds to silently review the piece. *** Provide sight reading piece and allow the student 30 seconds for review *** Your practice time has finished. Here is your tempo. *** Provide the tempo for every student *** *** Listen to sight-reading example and then collect the sight-reading example *** Thank you. Please wait a moment. *** Fill in “Sight Reading” section both on the computer and paper backup *** *** Click “Save Current Score ***
CBRS. Is the project located in a CBRS Unit? No Document and upload map and documentation below. Yes Compliance Determination This project is not located in a CBRS Unit. Therefore, this project has no potential to impact a CBRS Unit and is in compliance with the Coastal Barrier Resources Act. Supporting documentation Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? Yes No Flood Insurance General requirements Legislation Regulation Certain types of federal financial assistance may not be used in floodplains unless the community participates in National Flood Insurance Program and flood insurance is both obtained and maintained. Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 as amended (42 USC 4001-4128) 24 CFR 50.4(b)(1) and 24 CFR 58.6(a) and (b); 24 CFR 55.1(b). 1. Does this project involve financial assistance for construction, rehabilitation, or acquisition of a mobile home, building, or insurable personal property? No. This project does not require flood insurance or is excepted from flood insurance. Yes
Tiered Environment Review for Activity/Project that is Categorically Excluded Subject to Section 58.5 Pursuant to 24 CFR 58.35(a) Project Information Project Name: Housing-Production-CHDOs HEROS Number: 900000010029166 Responsible Entity (RE): MONTGOMERY COUNTY, DIVISION OF REVENUE ROCKVILLE MD, 20850 State / Local Identifier: RE Preparer: Trivens kargbo Certifying Officer: Clarence Snuggs Grant Recipient (if different than Responsible Entity): Point of Contact: Consultant (if applicable): Point of Contact: Project Location: 1401 Rockville Pike, MD 20852 Additional Location Information: County wide Direct Comments to: Description of the Proposed Project [24 CFR 50.12 & 58.32; 40 CFR 1508.25]: The project will fund the housing development activities of CHDOs. This represents the federally mandated fifteen percent of the HOME allocation. Up to 10 percent of this total ($20,000) may be used for technical assistance, site control, and seed money loans. It is anticipated that one to three organizations will use these funds for acquisition, construction, or renovation of rental housing for persons with low-incomes. This is estimated to produce or preserve 10 units.
Maps, photographs, and other documentation of project location and description: Determination: Finding of No Significant Impact [24 CFR 58.40(g)(1); 40 CFR 1508.13] The project will not result in a significant impact on the quality of human environment Finding of Significant Impact Review Certified by Tim Sovold, Chief, Technical Specialist Branch on 07/26/2017 Funding Information Grant / Project Identification Number HUD Program Program Name 124-35110 Housing: Multifamily FHA Section 221(d)(4). Mortgage Insurance for new construction or substantial rehabilitation of Multifamily Rental Housing - sponsors Estimated Total HUD Funded, Assisted or Insured Amount: $36,130,400.00 Estimated Total Project Cost [24 CFR 58.2 (a) (5)]: $43,087,873.00 Compliance with 24 CFR §50.4, §58.5 and §58.6 Laws and Authorities
Production Division Director Funding Information Grant / Project Identification Number HUD Program Program Name 031-35326 Housing: Multifamily FHA Section 221(d)(4). Mortgage Insurance for new construction or substantial rehabilitation of Multifamily Rental Housing - sponsors Estimated Total HUD Funded, Assisted or Insured Amount: $7,945,500.00 Estimated Total Project Cost [24 CFR 58.2 (a) (5)]: $22,210,246.00 Compliance with 24 CFR §50.4, §58.5 and §58.6 Laws and Authorities Compliance Factors: Statutes, Executive Orders, and Regulations listed at 24 CFR §50.4, §58.5, and §58.6 Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? Compliance determination (See Appendix A for source determinations) STATUTES, EXECUTIVE ORDERS, AND REGULATIONS LISTED AT 24 CFR §50.4 & § 58.6 Airport Hazards Clear Zones and Accident Potential Zones; 24 CFR Part 51 Subpart D Yes No The project site is not within 15,000 feet of a military airport or 2,500 feet of a civilian airport. The project is in compliance with Airport Hazards requirements. Coastal Barrier Resources Act Coastal Barrier Resources Act, as amended by the Coastal Barrier Improvement Act of 1990 [16 USC 3501] Yes No This project is not located in a CBRS Unit. Therefore, this project has no potential to impact a CBRS Unit and is in compliance with the Coastal Barrier Resources Act. Flood Insurance Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 and National Flood Insurance Yes No The structure or insurable property is not located in a FEMA-designated Special Flood Hazard Area. While flood
HUD-assisted projects must meet Acceptable Separation Distance (ASD) requirements to protect them from explosive and flammable hazards. N/A 24 CFR Part 51 Subpart C 1. Is the proposed HUD-assisted project a hazardous facility (a facility that mainly stores, handles or processes flammable or combustible chemicals), i.e. bulk fuel storage facilities, refineries, etc.? No Yes 2. Does this project include any of the following activities: development, construction, rehabilitation that will increase residential densities, or conversion? No Yes 3. Within 1 mile of the project site, are there any current or planned stationary aboveground storage containers: Of more than 100 gallon capacity, containing common liquid industrial fuels OR Of any capacity, containing hazardous liquids or gases that are not common liquid industrial fuels? No Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Document and upload all documents used to make your determination below. Yes Screen Summary Compliance Determination There are no current or planned stationary aboveground storage containers of concern
Attached are a analysis of the need for tribal consultation, a map showing the age of the buildings in the Area of Potential Effect, the Section 106 worksheet, and a memo from City of Greensboro preservation staff performed on July 12, 2017 under the authority of the City's programmatic agreement with the State Historic Preservation Office. Noise Abatement and Control Noise Control Act of 1972, as amended by the Quiet Communities Act of 1978; 24 CFR Part 51 Subpart B Yes No Based on the project description, this project includes no activities that would require further evaluation under HUD's noise regulation. The project is in compliance with HUD's Noise regulation. Sole Source Aquifers Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, as amended, particularly section 1424(e); 40 CFR Part 149 Yes No Based on the project description, the project consists of activities that are unlikely to have an adverse impact on groundwater resources. Additionally, there are no sole-source aquifers in North Carolina. The project is in compliance with Sole Source Aquifer requirements. Wetlands Protection Executive Order 11990, particularly sections 2 and 5 Yes No Since this project consists solely of the rehabilitation of an existing building interior and will not include any new ground disturbance, based on the project description this project includes no activities that would require further evaluation under this section. The project is in compliance with Executive Order 11990. Wild and Scenic Rivers Act Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968, particularly section 7(b) and (c) Yes No This project is not within proximity of a NWSRS river. This is based on the fact that no NWSRS rivers are located in Guilford County; no rivers in North Carolina are currently on the study list; and the study site is not in the vicinity of the Haw River, which is listed on the National River Inventory. Additionally, the project will not involve any changes to a local body or water or storwater drainage. The project is in compliance with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. HUD HOUSING ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS
Supporting documentation Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? Yes No Wild and Scenic Rivers Act General requirements Legislation Regulation The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act provides federal protection for certain free-flowing, wild, scenic and recreational rivers designated as components or potential components of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System (NWSRS) from the effects of construction or development. The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1271-1287), particularly section 7(b) and (c) (16 U.S.C. 1278(b) and (c)) 36 CFR Part 297 1. Is your project within proximity of a NWSRS river? No Yes, the project is in proximity of a Designated Wild and Scenic River or Study Wild and Scenic River. Yes, the project is in proximity of a Nationwide Rivers Inventory (NRI) River. Screen Summary Compliance Determination This project is not within proximity of a NWSRS river. The project is in compliance with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. Supporting documentation Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? Yes
Noise Abatement and Control General requirements Legislation Regulation HUD’s noise regulations protect residential properties from excessive noise exposure. HUD encourages mitigation as appropriate. Noise Control Act of 1972 General Services Administration Federal Management Circular “Compatible Land Uses at Federal Airfields” Title 24 CFR 51 Subpart B 1. What activities does your project involve? Check all that apply: New construction for residential use Rehabilitation of an existing residential property NOTE: For modernization projects in all noise zones, HUD encourages mitigation to reduce levels to acceptable compliance standards. See 24 CFR 51 Subpart B for further details. The definition of “modernization” is determined by program office guidance. A research demonstration project which does not result in new construction or reconstruction An interstate land sales registration Any timely emergency assistance under disaster assistance provision or appropriations which are provided to save lives, protect property, protect public health and safety, remove debris and wreckage, or assistance that has the effect of restoring facilities substantially as they existed prior to the disaster None of the above 3. Complete the Preliminary Screening to identify potential noise generators in the vicinity (1000’ from a major road, 3000’ from a railroad, or 15 miles from an airport). Describe findings of the Preliminary Screening: Project site and surrounding area does include major highways within 5913.6 feet and a railroad within 4197.6 feet. An external noise assessment was conducted averaging 50.6dB during high traffic and train traffic. - Resulting in no adverse impact
Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? Yes No Coastal Barrier Resources General requirements Legislation Regulation HUD financial assistance may not be used for most activities in units of the Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS). See 16 USC 3504 for limitations on federal expenditures affecting the CBRS. Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) of 1982, as amended by the Coastal Barrier Improvement Act of 1990 (16 USC 3501) Is the project located in a CBRS Unit? No Document and upload map and documentation below. Yes Compliance Determination This project is not located in a CBRS Unit. Therefore, this project has no potential to impact a CBRS Unit and is in compliance with the Coastal Barrier Resources Act. Supporting documentation Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? Yes No Flood Insurance
Environmental Assessment Determinations and Compliance Findings for HUD-assisted Projects 24 CFR Part 50 Project Information Project Name: 085-43102-KingslandWalkSeniorLiving HEROS Number: 900000010052115 Applicant / Grant Prudential Huntoon Paige Associates, LLC Point of Contact: Michelle Pocetti HUD Preparer: Lillian Mano Consultant (if Point of Contact: Project Location: 6668 Vernon Avenue, University City, MO Additional Location Information: N/A Description of the Proposed Project [24 CFR 50.12 & 58.32; 40 CFR 1508.25]: Kingsland Walk is a proposed 69 bed assisted living and memory care facility in University City, Missouri - located just outside St Louis. The Assisted Living Units will feature full bathrooms with grab bars in the tubs/showers; wall to wall carpeting; walk-in and standard closets; individually controlled heating and air conditioning; kitchenette (refrigerator, microwave and sink), and an emergency medical alert system. The Memory Care units will feature full bathrooms with grab bars in the tubs/showers; wall to wall carpeting; standard closets; individually controlled heating and air conditioning; and an emergency medical alert
Endangered Species Act Endangered Species Act of 1973, particularly section 7; 50 CFR Part 402 Yes No This project May Affect, but is Not Likely to Adversely Affect, listed species, and informal consultation was conducted. This project is in compliance with the Endangered Species Act without mitigation. Explosive and Flammable Hazards Above-Ground Tanks)[24 CFR Part 51 Subpart C Yes No There are no current or planned stationary aboveground storage containers of concern within 1 mile of the project site. The project is in compliance with explosive and flammable hazard requirements. There will be NO ASTs installed with the project. See email for confirmation. Farmlands Protection Farmland Protection Policy Act of 1981, particularly sections 1504(b) and 1541; 7 CFR Part 658 Yes No This project does not include any activities that could potentially convert agricultural land to a non-agricultural use. The project is in compliance with the Farmland Protection Policy Act. Urbanization map attached. Floodplain Management Executive Order 11988, particularly section 2(a); 24 CFR Part 55 Yes No This project is located in a 500-year floodplain. The project is a critical action, so the 8-Step is required for the project to be in compliance with Executive Order 11988. All 8-Step materials and flood map exhibits are located on the 2040 Flood Insurance page. In order to restore some of the water storage and filtration values of the floodplain, the proposed development will utilize permeable pavers throughout the parking lots. Permeable pavers allow rainfall to percolate back into the earth below, rather than being directed to storm sewer systems. This reduces surface runoff and allows for natural filtration of the rainfall without increasing runoff from impervious surfaces. The use of these permeable pavers represents a Best Management Practice (BMP) for stormwater management and will help to restore the natural values attributed to floodplain areas that have not been impacted.
expanded range of coverage is realized with the fusion of UPA, SVS and corner radar for enhanced security. Front Cross Traffic Alert Front Camera, Front Corner Radar, UPA, SVS, Braking Control If the vehicle is stationary, the driver attempts to pull away and the system detects one or more targets which may be at risk of collision, either within the intended lane / path of travel or which are likely to move into the lane / path of travel, the system shall provide a warning to the driver indicating location of the target at risk. Front Junction-Intersection Assist Camera, Corner Radar, SVS, UPA, Braking Control If the vehicle is stationary and the driver attempts to initiate forward motion which causes risk of collision due to some form of cross traffic or object which is stationary ahead, the system shall inhibit the pull-away. Highway Chauffer Front Radar(s) Camera, Driver Monitoring, Steering & Braking Control This feature is an autonomy solution that allows the driver to enable Level 3 (SAE) driving. The driver’s readiness and ability to resume control is continuously monitored. The driver is required to monitor the driving task, and when requested to take back control, they will be given 3 seconds to do so. Highway Chauffer handles all required driving on limited access highways with driver supervision. It handles lane management, speed modulation, and path planning. Rear – Auto Emergency Braking UPA, Rear Camera, Radar, Braking Control Ultrasonic-only or ultrasonic+camera-fusion provides obstacle detection and evaluation for Rear Automatic Emergency Braking (Rear AEB). The feature will automatically brake in case an object is in the path of the vehicle supporting NCAP
Ms Megan Davison Executive Director, Victoria Division Minerals Council of Australia (MCA) Mr Noel Laidlaw Member and Advisor The Prospectors and Miners Association of Victoria (PMAV) Mr Tim Peggie Lead Director, Regional Victorian Planning Authority (VPA) Member to be determined Member representing environmental interests and expertise Member to be determined Member representing community interests and expertise DEPARTMENTAL MEMBERS Mr Ross McGowan Executive Director, Earth Resources Regulation Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources (DEDJTR) Ms Elizabeth Radcliffe Director, Stakeholder Relations and Strategy Earth Resources Regulation Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources (DEDJTR) Mr Tony Robinson Director, Regulatory and Compliance Earth Resources Regulation Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources (DEDJTR)
Earth Resources Regulation Statement of Operating Change (Minerals) Message from Anthony Hurst Executive Director, Earth Resources Regulation Earth Resources Regulation is open for business — We will implement, monitor and improve Earth Resources Regulation is progressively implementing changes to improve the way we regulate earth resources projects. With the release of our first statement in May 2018 and our statement for extractives in July 2018, we committed to the adoption of an outcomes-based approach to regulation. This statement focuses on how we are streamlining regulatory approvals for the minerals industry. The Victorian Government is committed to continuous improvement in the regulation of the earth resources sector. The Government has allocated $12.7 million to implement a range of actions, following the Commissioner for Better Regulation’s report, Getting the Groundwork Right: Better regulation of mines and quarries. An implementation plan, released in May 2018, documents the sequenced approach to regulatory improvement that we are delivering. We welcome and value your feedback. You can contact us via: . Part A — Introduction Assessment of changes to work plans This statement delivers on the commitment in our Implementation Plan to simplify and streamline work plan variation approval processes. Our first statement set out the principles that we will follow and what you can expect from us, as a modern, proportionate and robust regulator for the earth resources sector. It also provided initial guidance about the transition to modern work plans and the option to consolidate work plans. This statement introduces and explains a simplified approval pathway for variation to work plans under an existing approved licence, including: when a work plan variation is triggered how significant increase in risk is determined. Our intention is to establish a clear and mutual understanding about the arrangements for varying work plans for existing minerals authority holders. This includes work plans under mining, exploration, prospecting and retention licences. The equivalent statement for extractives was released in July 2018. We have already commenced working with industry to implement the simplified approval pathway for work plan variations. For circumstances where a work plan requires changes, but does not reach
This concept would: Avoid declaration by manufacturer (also declaration of device classes) Receiver requirements and tests are related to the TX power and/or OBW RX sensitivity could be related to a minimum distance (min distance is related to e.g. EIRP) Consider Object separation requirement (related to OBW) Interference concept, (majority support): In band (kind is related the use-cases, under discussion) “Adjacent range”: related OWB, e.g. @ f = fc ± OBW, kind of interferer more “real” “remote” range: fixed from boarder (permitted range of operation), e.g. 3GHz below 76GHz and above 77GHz, kind: CW Picture from discussion concept 3: Decision RX-concept: support to develop/revise the document based on this concept. Action for rapporteur: to delete all “limits” out of the doc, numbers shall only be used as an example. Limit evaluation shall take place during the preparation of the related EN (use-cases, wanted performance related) to add radar formula in the doc (as the “background” to update use-case requirements based on contributions and work on SRdoc work editorials, structure of the document: rapporteur will work on the document, “neutral”, insert of concept 3,… Issue: target/echo simulator: TG SRR agreed that this solution is the “favour” test procedure for the future EN Wording to be checked to avoid mix-up with military terminology (Radar Target / Echo simulator) Action for the “R&S” and “Keysight” to prepare a generic text for document More details in related EN/measurement document NWI for ENs? Plans, next steps, possible time schedule Old shopping list Additional: level of confidence for number, see ERMTGSRR(18)035009 Contribution Result:
Qualifications (GCSEs, RSA, NVQ, A Levels etc) Subject obtained/to be taken e.g. English Language Level e.g. GCSE Examining Body e.g. CCEA Grade Year obtained/expected Further Education (University or College) First third level qualification Name of institution Dates attended Title of qualification Specify if a degree, diploma or certificate (include class and division) Main subjects Date Awarded/ expected Postgraduate Qualification Name of institution Dates attended Title of qualification Specify if a degree, diploma or certificate (include by study or research) Main subjects Date Awarded/ expected Professional/Vocational Qualifications and Membership Professional/Vocational Qualification obtained Date Professional bodies of which you are a member Membership Grade
Local 8: OMRUMINUS(U) :NIL Local 9: OSHORTPLUS(U) :NIL Local 10: OSHORTMINUS(U) :NIL Local 11: OPANEL(U) :NIL Local 12: NI(U) :NIL Local 13: CTITLE(C) : STACK MSAPP:SKINP10APP(APLIB000.PRW) 02/02/2012 16:14:17 Local 1: SELF(O) :O Local 2: OLOGINPANEL(O) :O Local 3: OMAINPANEL(O) :O Local 4: OTPANEL(O) :O Local 5: OMPANEL(O) :O Local 6: OBPANEL(U) :NIL Local 7: OOWNERMBAR(O) :O Local 8: OPLOGIN(O) :O Local 9: OPENV(O) :O Local 10: OENTER(U) :NIL Local 11: OCANCEL(U) :NIL Local 12: OOK(U) :NIL Local 13: OUSER(O) :O Local 14: OPASSWORD(O) :O Local 15: ODATA2(O) :O Local 16: ODATA4(O) :O Local 17: OEMPFIL(O) :O Local 18: OAMB(O) :O
Extramural Routing Sheet (ERS) (Former ARS & Green Sheet – Institutional Use Only) (Effective 12-13-16) Office for Sponsored Programs & Technology Transfer (OSPTT) OSPTT Email address: PROJECT INFORMATION Principal Investigator Name: Project Title: Project Start Date : (mm/dd/yyyy) Project End Date: (mm/dd/yyyy) Request for Proposal (RFP) Announcement # (If nonfederal, please attach a copy of the announcement) LSUHSC-S FACULTY PAID FROM THIS PROJECT–GRANT YR # 1 ONLY Role in Project (PI, Co-PI, Collaborator, Consultant) Name Department Annual % Effort Annual % Salary Annual COI Completed Signature Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No PI is REQUIRED to apply 20% effort/salary to project – ref: LSUHSC-S Policy on Grant Applications & Expenditures, If PI is requesting exemption/salary waiver for salary support of less than 20%, exemption waiver must be approved in writing by the Associate Dean for Research PRIOR to proposal submittal to funding agency. Please attach a copy of the waiver request email. SPONSOR INFORMATION Sponsor Name: Sponsor Deadline Date (mm/dd/yyyy) PI has Rolling Submission Status ⁭Electronic submission: OSPTT submit PI submit Proposal Type- Select one New- original submission of a full proposal Supplement-request for additional funds during an approval project period to proposal # Competing Continuation/Renewal- advances and extends the science of the initial grant - Federal ID # Non-competing Continuation Resubmission – For NIH, Federal ID # Project Type- Select one Basic Science Research Clinical Research Education Equipment Fellowship Hospital Service Instruction/Training Translational Research Other Application Type- Select one Grant Consortium/Subcontract Scientific Research Agreement Other
[If the Agency reported payables to the defined benefit pension plan, it should disclose information required by paragraph 122 of Statement 68.] ERS Employer Agency Required Supplementary Information Schedule of Proportionate Share of the Net Pension Liability Employees’ Retirement System For the Year Ended June 30 (Dollar amounts in thousands) 2015 Agency’s proportion of the net pension liability X.XXX% Agency’s proportionate share of the net pension liability $ XX,XXX Agency’s covered-employee payroll $ XX,XXX Agency’s proportionate share of the net pension liability as a percentage of its covered-employee payroll X.XX% Plan fiduciary net position as a percentage of the total pension liability 77.99% Note: Schedule is intended to show information for the last 10 fiscal years. Additional years will be displayed as they become available. ERS Employer Agency Required Supplementary Information Schedule of Contributions Employees’ Retirement System For the Year Ended June 30 (Dollar amounts in thousands) 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
How has the child/ young person been involved? Learning Journal ☐ All About Me Pupil Profile Target setting ☐ Communication Passport ☐ SEN Support Plan Review Meeting ☐ Questionnaires ☐ Programme Designs ☐ After school programme ☐ Participation in wider school life Other How have the parents/carers/family been involved? Home School Contact Book ☐ Programme Designs ☐ SEN Support Plan Review Meeting Target setting ☐ Parents Evenings Timetabling for child ☐ Questionnaires Recruitment of support staff ☐ Other
Black – Ghanaian BGHA Black – Nigerian BNGN Black – Somali BSOM Chinese CHNE Gypsy – Roma WROM Indian AIND Information Not Yet Obtained NOBT Iranian OIRN Iraqi OIRQ Japanese OJPN Latin/South/Central American OLAM Pakistani APKN Other Asian AOTA Other Black African BAOF Other ethnic group OOEG Refused REFU Traveler of Irish Heritage WIRT White WOTW White and Asian MWAS White and Black African MWBA White and Black Caribbean MWBC White - British WBRI White Western European WWEU White – Irish WIRI White Eastern European WEEU
Service Now Ticket Creation New users to the Enrollment Reporting System (ERS) application will need an Account. The above form should be completed, along with the Confidentiality Form, and attached to a Service Now ticket. The Service Now ticketing application can be accessed via the CSU Portal at , Select your campus from the dropdown per the following screenshot: Click Login once a campus has been selected. You will be directed to the CSU Portal website. Select the IT Support link. Click the Login link located in the left column and the Service Now self-service screen will display. Screen content may differ from user to user. Selecting the Create an Enrollment Reporting Request link will invoke an ERSx specific template When that link is selected a template will appear similar to the following screenshot. This template will display a series of fields that have default values or require a selection from a group of values. Complete the fields as per the following. NOTE: Fields with a red bar are mandatory. The Name and Location of the ticket initiator will default into those respective fields. No action is required on behalf of the ticket initiator.
Pension Expense and Deferred Outflows of Resources and Deferred Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions For the year ended September 30, 2016, the City recognized pension expense of [see general ledger amount]. At September 30, 2016, the City reported deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions of the following sources: Deferred Outflows of Resources Deferred Inflows of Resources Differences between expected and actual experience See Detail Table Pg 4 See Detail Table Pg 4 Changes of assumptions See Detail Table Pg 4 See Detail Table Pg 4 Net difference between projected and actual earnings on pension plan investments See Detail Table Pg 4 See Detail Table Pg 4 Employer contributions subsequent to the measurement date * See Detail Table Pg 4 Total Total of above Total of above *Enter FY 2016 employer contributions applied to pension liability and add for total Deferred Outflows of Resources Amounts reported as deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources to pensions will be recognized in pension expense as follows: Year ended September 30: 2016 [See Detail Report Page 7] 2017 [See Detail Report Page 7] 2018 [See Detail Report Page 7] 2019 [See Detail Report Page 7] 2020 [See Detail Report Page 7] Thereafter [See Detail Report Page 7]
Net Pension Liability The City’s net pension liability was measured as of September 30, 2014, and the total pension liability used to calculate the net pension liability was determined by an actuarial valuation as September 30, 2013 rolled forward to September 30, 2014 using standard roll-forward techniques as shown in the following table: Total Pension Liability as of September 30, 2013 (a) $ Detail table page 2 Entry Age Normal Cost for October 1, 2013—September 30, 2014 (b) $ Detail table page 2 Actual Benefit Payments and Refunds for October 1, 2013—September 30, 2014 (c) $ Detail table page 2 Total Pension Liability as of September 30, 2014 [(a) x (1.08)] + (b) – [(c) x (1.04)] $ Detail table page 2 Actuarial assumptions. The total pension liability in the September 30, 2013 actuarial valuation was determined using the following actuarial assumptions, applied to all periods included in the measurement: Inflation 3.00% Salary increases 3.75% - 7.25% Investment rate of return* 8.00% *Net of pension plan investment expense Mortality rates for ERS were based on the RP-2000 Combined Mortality Table Projected with Scale AA to 2015 set forward three years for males and two years for females. The rates of mortality for the period after disability retirement are according to the sex distinct RP-2000 Disability Mortality Table. The actuarial assumptions used in the September 30, 2013 valuation were based on the results of an investigation of the economic and demographic experience for the ERS based upon participant data as of September 30, 2010. The Board of Control accepted and approved these changes on January 27, 2012, which became effective at the beginning of fiscal year 2012.
Net difference between projected and actual earnings on pension plan investments See Detail Table Pg 4 See Detail Table Pg 4 Employer contributions subsequent to the measurement date * See Detail Table Pg 4 Total Total of above Total of above *Enter FY 2017 employer contributions applied to pension liability and add for total Deferred Outflows of Resources Amounts reported as deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources to pensions will be recognized in pension expense as follows: Year ended September 30: 2018 [See Detail Report Page 7] 2019 [See Detail Report Page 7] 2020 [See Detail Report Page 7] 2021 [See Detail Report Page 7] 2022 [See Detail Report Page 7] Thereafter [See Detail Report Page 7]
Membership Project SRO: Trust Executive (Chair) CCG Executive Lead: tbc Trust Project Lead: tbc CCG Project Lead: tbc NHS Digital Business Change Manager: tbc NHS England Regional Lead: NHS England Regional Implementation Manager: NHS England DCO Lead: tbc NHS Improvement Lead: tbc Attendees Individuals will attend for specific agenda items as appropriate. Quoracy The Project Board will be quorate if at least four members are present including: Trust Executive Lead (SRO) CCG Executive Lead NHS England representation NHS Digital representation Frequency of Meetings The Project Board will meet at least monthly for the duration of the project. This will commence with a ‘kick off’ meeting and reconvene after the initial phase of data analysis work (e.g. week 6). The Project Board will be underpinned by a local Steering Group meeting at fortnightly / weekly intervals as appropriate to ensure project delivery. Standing Agenda Welcome and introductions Apologies Minutes of the last meeting Progress against project delivery plan NHS Digital Data quality Current performance Trust actions CCG actions
VOLUNTEER IN EDUCATION PROGRAM - VIE Aside from PTA programs, families can also choose to participate in Erieview’s VIE (Volunteer in Education) Program. The Erieview PTA does not organize this program. As the school year gets underway, your child’s classroom teacher will provide information about his or her specific VIE needs. Typically, a VIE volunteers in the classroom helping children practice academic skills as directed by the teacher or helping students or teachers with special projects, etc. HOW DO I GET INVOLVED? We invite you to support your student and Erieview by becoming a PTA member! • Please complete the Membership form on the website: Membership can be paid on line, checks payable to Erieview PTA, or cash is also accepted. • Volunteers are an integral part of the PTA! Volunteer sign up opportunities will be posted by Committee Chairs in the weekly email Bulletin. Please keep an eye out for ways to volunteer! • If interested, please complete the Room Parent Form on the Cheddarup website: https://erieview-pta-membership2017.cheddarup.com. • If you have any questions about membership, volunteering, specific events or committees please feel free to contact a Board Member directly or Erieview PTA at erieviewpta@gmail.com. THANK YOU!
AGENDA ITEM 5 3 2017 ERW Improvement Plan PIAP 2016 Update on progress made against the PIAP and changes to responsibilities RECOMMENDATIONS / KEY DECISIONS REQUIRED: REASONS: Report Author: Betsan O’Connor Designation: Managing Director Tel No. 01267 245638 E. Mail: Betsan.oconnor@erw.org.uk EXECUTIVE
AGENDA ITEM 3 3 2015 Lead Creative School Scheme Purpose: To give and overview and update of the Lead Creative School scheme in the ERW region RECOMMENDATIONS / KEY DECISIONS REQUIRED: For information only REASONS: Lead Creative Schools update Report Author: Sophie Hadaway Designation: Regional Lead – ERW region Tel No. 07710 026079 E. Mail: EXECUTIVE
Breed: Sex: Color: Tattoo: DOB: DTB: S: S Color: D: D Color: Breed: Sex: Color: Tattoo: DOB: DTB: S: S Color: D: D Color: Breed: Sex: Color: Tattoo: DOB: DTB: S: S Color: D: D Color: Breed: Sex: Color: Tattoo: DOB: DTB: S: S Color: D: D Color: Breed: Sex: Color: Tattoo: DOB: DTB: S: S Color: D: D Color: Breed: Sex: Color: Tattoo: DOB: DTB: S: S Color: D: D Color:
The problem with effectiveness does not stop in Pakistan. There is a lot of data that suggests the United States is targeting people in Yemen who have little to no interest in the United States. By October 19, 2012 the United States had conducted 35 drone strikes in Yemen. Many of these strikes were directed at Islamic extremist factions that were hostile toward the Yemen government. The second deterrent that the drone program poses is simple intimidation. The idea behind a strategy as bold and pervasive as drone strikes is that they would quietly set terror organizations into compliance by forcing them to realize that they were out gunned and outmanned at all times; militants were safe nowhere, not even in their homes. Because of this the surge of people willing to plot against the United States would level off and ultimately decline. According to Jason Lyall’s research this simply was not the case. Lyall used quantitative analysis of a large amount of data on drone strikes in Pakistan, Somalia, Yemen, and Afghanistan, and military activity in these areas between 2006 and 2011. Lyall found that over a seven day period there was an estimated of .371 more insurgent attacks in the 2km2 around the targeted village. This difference rose to 2.14 attacks with a 100 km2 radius around the bombed village for the same seven day period. If the number of days after the strike is increased to 120 then there is a 3.08 increase in insurgent attacks for the area 2km2 around the village. Similarly, if the distance of the observed area is widened to 100km2 around the village there is an increase of 16.81 militant attacks. Not only did it not have a deterrent effect on the terror actors, it actually had the opposite than hoped for effect. Lyall found that when a place was subjected to drone strikes there was a positive association with an increased amount of insurgent attacks, exactly opposite the relationship expected by supporters of the drone program.
Actividad: Tabla de evaluación del riesgo para la situación A Fuente del Peligro (descripción sencilla) Peligro (descripción sencilla) Personas en riesgo Posibles consecuencias - Lesiones Probabilidad (utiliza los niveles de calificación de la Tabla 1) Gravedad (utiliza los niveles de calificación de la Tabla 1) Nivel de Riesgo (utiliza los niveles de calificación de la Tabla 1) 1 2 3 4
Aquarium Sand 0 Petco 1 1 $4.50 $4.50 $4.50 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 Aquarium gravel 0 Petco 2 3 $3.00 $6.00 $9.00 $3.99 $7.98 $11.97 Small paper cups, 4 oz. 0 Fred Meyer 1 1 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.79 $4.79 $4.79 No Stick Spray 0 variety, grocery 2 3 $3.00 $6.00 $9.00 $2.49 $4.98 $7.47 Watering Can yes variety, grocery, home improvement, hardware 1 1 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $2.49 $2.49 $2.49 Mixing vessels yes grocery, variety 10 14 $0.70 $7.00 $9.80 $0.70 $7.00 $9.80 Craft sticks or spoons for stirring 0 grocery, variety, craft 10 14 $0.03 $0.30 $0.42 $0.03 $0.30 $0.42 Safety Goggles Yes School Supply 10 10 $5.00 $50.00 $50.00 $5.00 $50.00 $50.00 Weight Set Yes School Supply 10 10 $10.00 $100.00 $100.00 $10.00 $200.00 $200.00 Shipping Costs $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $18.00 $18.00 Total Bricks For A Pigs materials cost $40.23 $187.80 $196.72 $59.49 $207.54 $216.94 Buyer’s Guide Notes Item to purchase Notes Non-toxic Self-hardening Clay Crayola non-toxic self-hardening clay is low cost and widely available Sand Aquarium sand is clean and dust-free and recommended for safety. Although it is a little more expensive, colored sand is an option. Color choices often make engineering projects more exciting for students
Aquarium gravel Aquarium gravel comes in a variety of colors. Color choices often make engineering projects more exciting for students. Aquarium gravel is clean and dust-free and recommended for safety. Small paper cups, 4oz. none Watering Can or bottle with sprinkle cap none Mixing vessels 24 oz gladware-type soup/salad containers, 6-8 oz plastic drinking cups work; 1 per 3-4 students Craft sticks or spoons for stirring 1 per 3-4 students Heavyweight small paper plates or cardboard flats These are the roofs for the houses, support the weights for strength testing Weights set 1 per group of 3-4 students, weight sets are useful for other science and math lessons Shipping Costs www.petco.com free shipping over $49 3: Using Alternative Materials for Bricks: Pancake Mix, Flour, Glue and Water Construction Steps In front of the students, as a class demonstration, prepare two examples of each type of brick according to the instructions below. If you have older students, assign volunteers to do the measuring and mixing for you.
The final in-training evaluation report (FITER) will be completed by the Program Director, with input from the Residency Training Committee, based on a summation of all ITERs, feedback from interprofessional team members, Mini CEX, summative oral examination, and the scholarly project General Educational Objectives/Competencies Medical Expert/ Family Medicine Expert The Family Physician is a skilled clinician. Family Medicine is a Community Based Discipline. The patient-physician relationship is central to the role of the Family Physician. General Objective #1: The resident will demonstrate skills in performing a palliative care consultation. Specific objectives: The resident will be able to: perform a complete palliative care consultation, including assessing the physical, social, psychological, spiritual and functional parameters for a palliative care patient. communicate the findings both written and verbally. General Objective #2: The resident will be able to demonstrate advanced knowledge, skill, and attitudes in managing pain in advanced illness. Specific objectives: The resident will be able to demonstrate the knowledge of: Assessment of pain, including the use of validated assessment tools, history taking skills, physical examination skills, and appropriate ordering and interpretation of investigations; the common and less common cancer pain syndromes; the neurophysiology of pain transmission; the pharmacology (pharmacokinetics and dynamics) of medications used in pain control; the special issues in assessment of pain in patients with cognitive impairment and with communication difficulties; dose selection, titration, routes of administration and effectiveness of pain medications. Medications include: opioids, including methadone; adjuvants; NSAIDS, anti-depressants, anti-consultants, steroids, ketamine, etc.
COMMERCIAL COURT No. 1 OF BARCELONA PATENTS SECTION Judges: Mr. Alfonso Merino Rebollo Mr. Florencio Molina López Ms. Yolanda Ríos López Matter: Ordinary Proceedings No. 353/2016 Section E Plaintiff: Court Attorney: Ángel Joaniquet Tamburini Lawyer: Luis Fernández-Novoa Valladares Defendant: Court Attorney: Ignacio López Chocarro Lawyer: Alejandra Matas Brancós Subject matter of the proceedings: patent rights infringement and validity. DECISION No. 84/2018 Barcelona, 26 March 2018 FIRST.- On May 17, 2016, Mr. ÁNGEL JOANIQUET TAMBURINI, Court Attorney, filed a complaint on behalf of the company SCA TISSUE FRANCE SAS (hereinafter SCA), domiciled at 151-161 Boulevard Victor Hugo, 93400 Saint Ouen, France, against the company INDUSTRIE CARTARIE TRONCHETTI IBÉRICA S.L. (hereinafter ICT) based on the infringement of claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 9 of patent ES 2.299.237 (Spanish part of the European patent EP 1.081.284), in relation with the manufacturing and marketing of the products commercially known as FOXY SEDA and FOXY BOUQUET, LANTA 3 CAPAS, DIA PREMIUM, AUCHAN SUPREME and AUCHAN FLORAL. In the pleading section of the complaint it is requested the Court to issue a Decision: a) which declares: 1.1.- That SCA TISSUE FRANCE SAS is the legal owner of the patent ES 2.299.237. 1.2.- That the defendant, INDUSTRIE CARTARIE TRONCHETTI IBÉRICA S.L., is manufacturing and/or importing, offering and marketing in Spain toilet paper products named FOXY SEDA and BOUQUET, LANTA 3 CAPAS, DIA PREMIUM, and AUCHAN SUPREME and FLORAL which make use of the technology protected by the patent ES 2.299.237 (EP 1.081.284) owned by SCA TISSUE FRANCE SAS, without permission of authorization from