Scoring Guidance – Clinical Judgment and Decision Making Capacity to monitor developing situations, anticipate problems and generate functional outcomes 1 Unsatisfactory 2 Weak 3 Typical 4 Very Good 5 Outstanding Initial appreciation of scenario is poor. No urgency demonstrated Mostly appreciated the wider needs of the situation Fully appreciated the wider needs of the situation & seeks team input Failed to pick up on signs that indicate a change in condition Picked up main changes in clinical condition Was constantly alert to symptoms and signs which may destabilise patient Failed to think ahead or plan contingencies Regularly reviewed situation Regularly reviewed the situation and demonstrated forward planning Disorganised unsystematic approach Some evidence of structured thinking Prioritised information and tasks. Personal plan of action. Appropriate help Was unable to suggest workable solutions to problem Produced firm ideas about workable solutions to problems Took decisive and appropriate action to solve problems Additional comments Overall rating: Clinical judgment & decision making Please circle a single score for this attribute 1 2 3 4 5
Scoring Guidance – Working Under Pressure Capacity to make decisions under pressure and retain control. Awareness of own limitations 1 Unsatisfactory 2 Weak 3 Typical 4 Very Good 5 Outstanding Was tense & agitated most of the time Remained calm most of the time Seemed very relaxed & comfortable with demands of situation Was hesitant most of the time Demonstrated decisiveness Responded quickly & decisively to unexpected circumstances Performance hindered by focussing on immediate worries Maintained perspective Maintained perspective throughout Was rude/ offensive to others when challenged Showed flexibility when challenged Was always flexible & open in manner when challenged Did not adapt to pressure of situation & changing circumstances Showed some insight into own limitations within scenario Was always aware of own limitations and where further help could be sought Disregarded/ ignored other’s opinions Listened and responded to other’s opinions/ questions Used effective strategies to deal with impact of others opinions/ questions Additional comments Overall rating: Working under pressure Please circle a single score for this attribute 1 2 3 4 5
Scoring Guidance – Team Working Capacity to work effectively with others and demonstrate appropriate leadership 1 Unsatisfactory 2 Weak 3 Typical 4 Very Good 5 Outstanding Lacked awareness of performance of team members Showed awareness of the level of competence of team members Ensured that the capabilities of whole team match tasks Showed no evidence of understanding others needs or concerns Negotiated & compromised appropriately with team members Always confirmed understanding & instructions, communicated plans clearly Was rude or offhand to other team members Built rapport with other team members Remained very sympathetic & considerate to all other team members Failed to delegate & demonstrate leadership Delegated effectively Demonstrated leadership with authority and justification Pursued complex tasks with no additional support Called for help when needed Called for appropriate help with clear instructions Was confrontational & critical of other team members Maintained a approach Maintained a very participative approach Additional comments Overall rating: Team working Please circle a single score for this attribute 1 2 3 4 5
Scoring Guidance - Communication Includes both verbal and non verbal communication 1 Unsatisfactory 2 Weak 3 Typical 4 Very Good 5 Outstanding Used poor verbal communication with no explanation of actions Communicated well most of the time Used excellent verbal communication throughout with appropriate explanation of actions Did not consider others. No empathy or sympathy shown Was considerate and showed empathy / sympathy some of the time Was very considerate. Demonstrated much empathy and sympathy at all times Failed to engage verbally with others Predominantly good engagement verbally with others Maintained excellent engagement with others throughout Poor eye contact and was unable to adapt body language/ behaviour Good eye contact and modified non-verbal behaviour during assessment Good eye contact and made very effective use of non-verbal behaviour Was defensive/aggressive/ agitated during assessment Appeared comfortable during assessment most of the time Remained relaxed and comfortable throughout Illegible hand writing Majority legible Very clear and legible handwriting Additional comments Overall rating: Communication Please circle a single score for this attribute 1 2 3 4 5
Scoring Guidance – Organisation and Planning Capacity to prioritise time and information in a structured and planned manner 1 Unsatisfactory 2 Weak 3 Typical 4 Very Good 5 Outstanding Was unable to meet deadline of challenge Tasks completed with reasonable time management Managed time very effectively ensuring all tasks were completed Was unable to structurally plan for approaching issues Was able to formulate a reasonable plan for approaching issues Made clear methodical plans to address all issues Was unable to prioritise tasks presented Was able to prioritise tasks appropriately Prioritised clearly & efficiently based on needs and urgency Did not utilise or recognise resources effectively Made satisfactory use of resources Made very efficient use of all available resources Illogical, unsystematic approach to assessment Good evidence of logical & systematic approach to assessment Completely logical and systematic throughout the assessment Additional comments Overall rating: Organisation and planning Please circle a single score for this attribute 1 2 3 4 5