zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Center for Surgical Innovation (CSI) UCD Center for Surgical Innovation Faculty and Profiles: CARDIOTHORACIC Cardiac Frederick Grover, MD Joseph Cleveland, MD David Fullerton, MD Thoracic John Mitchell, MD Michael Weyant, MD GENERAL SURGERY Advanced Laparoscopy Thomas Robinson, MD Greg Stiegmann, MD Bariatric Surgery Jonathon Schoen, MD Breast Surgery Christina Finlayson, MD Endocrine Surgery Christopher Raeburn, MD Robert McIntyre, MD Surgical Oncology Martin McCarter, MD Nathan Pearlman, MD GYNECOLOGY Laparoscopic Gynecology Ruben Alvero, MD William Schlaff, MD Gynecology Oncology Susan Davidson, MD Kian Behbakht, MD Michael Kelly, MD NEUROSURGERY Intracranial Surgery Kevin Lillehei, MD Spine Peter Witt, MD ORTHOPEDICS Spine Vikas Patel, MD Evalina Burger, MD Joint Replacement Michael Dayton, MD Sports Eric McCarty, MD Armando Vidal, MD OTOLARYNGOLOGY Todd Kingdom, MD Stephen Cass, MD UROLOGY Laparoscopic Urology Fernando Kim, MD Urologic Oncology Paul Maroni, MD Shandra Wilson, MD Female Urology/Incontinence Brian Flynn, MD VASCULAR SURGERY Pegge Hallandras, MD Mark Nehler, MD
David A. Fullerton, MD Professor and Chief, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery Residency Program Director Clinical Interests Adult cardiac revascularization, adult heart and lung transplantation, pediatric cardiac transplantation, surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation, myocardial revascularization and valve replacement, congenital coronary malformations. Medical School University of Missouri-Columbia, Magna Cum Laude Residency University of Washington, Seattle, Washington Fellowships Loma Linda University, University of Colorado Board Certification Surgery, Thoracic Surgery, Critical Care Frederick L. Grover, MD Professor and Aragón/Gonzalez-Giusti Chair Department of Surgery Director, Lung Transplantation Clinical Interests Adult cardiac surgery, lung transplantation, adult heart transplantation, surgery for lung cancer, thoracoscopy. Medical School Duke University Residency Duke University Medical Center; University of Colorado Fellowships Board Certification Surgery, Thoracic Surgery Stephen P. Cass, M.D., M.P.H. Associate Professor Department of Otolaryngology University of Colorado Denver
Robert C. McIntyre, Jr., MD Associate Professor Clinical Interests Endocrine surgery (thyroid, parathyroid, adrenal, pancreas), laparoscopic surgery, surgical oncology, general surgery, trauma and critical care. Medical School Tulane University Residency University of Colorado Fellowships University of Colorado Board Certification Surgery, Critical Care
Mark R. Nehler, MD Associate Professor Residency Program Director Clinical Interests Limb salvage surgery, quality of life assessment, chronic venous insufficiency, upper extremity ischemia, thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms, carotid artery disease, endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Medical School Oregon Health Sciences University Residency Oregon Health Sciences University Fellowships Oregon Health Sciences University Board Certification General Surgery, Vascular Surgery
FACULTY SABBATICAL & EVALUATION SCHEDULE ACADEMIC AFFAIRS, 2018-19 (5/7/19) Date Sabbaticals Post-Tenure 1st Year Probationary, and 1st Year Lecturer Reappointment 2nd, 4th and 6th Year Probationary Reappointment and Tenure Consideration 3rd and 5th Year Probationary Reappointment Promotion 3rd and 5th Year Lecturer and 3rd Year Senior Lecturer Reappointment Full-time Temporary (annually as necessary) All Faculty not under review, submit updated CV Mon., Sept. 3 *Faculty Handbook states: Sat., Sept. 1 Application to Department Chair (if applicable) Mon., Oct. 1 If approved, application with statement by Dept. Chair (if applicable) to appropriate Dean (or equivalent) for distribution to College Personnel Committee PAF to Department Personnel Committee PAF to Department Personnel Committee PAF to Department Personnel Committee PAF to Department Personnel Committee Thurs., Nov. 1 If approved, application with statement by College Personnel Committee to Dean (or equivalent) To College Personnel Committee To College Personnel Committee Wed., Nov. 7 If approved, complete application to Provost, with cost estimate December Trustee Meeting Final Approval by Board of Trustees at December meeting (12/7/18) Tues., Jan. 15 To Dean (or equivalent) To Dean (or equivalent) To Dean (or equivalent) To Dean (or equivalent) *Mon., Jan. 21 *Faculty Handbook states: Sun., Jan. 20 PAF to Department Personnel Committee Wed., Jan. 30 To Dean (or equivalent) Fri., Feb. 1 PAF to Department Personnel Committee *Mon., Feb. 11 *Faculty Handbook states: Sat., Feb. 9 To Provost Fri., Feb. 15 To College Personnel Committee To Provost To Provost To Provost To Provost To Chair and Dean (or equivalent) Fri., Mar. 1 To Dean (or equivalent) To Department Chair Fri., Mar. 15 Non-reappointment notification deadline Non-reappointment notification deadline Non-reappointment notification deadline notification deadline Mon., Apr. 1 To Dean (or equivalent) Mon., Apr. 15 To Provost Wed., May 1 Notification by Provost To Provost NOTES: 1) Current practice is to consider tenure and promotion simultaneously, 2) Senior Lecturers will be reviewed every third year of service, 3) *Due date in Faculty Handbook is on weekend day.
Faculty Self Appraisal Form (Maximum API Score:100, Minimum Required API:60 required) PART A A. General Information: Name: Designation: Department: Qualification: Area of Specialization: Date of Appointment: In Institution: In Present Post: Experience (In Years) At Previous Institution At Present Institution Total PART B ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (APIs) CATEGORY I: TEACHING, LEARNING AND EVALUATION RELATED ACTIVITIES (65) B. Additional Teaching Work Load (5): (Other than Regular Teaching Workload: Per Week --> Theory: One period (1Point), Lab: Two periods (1Point)) S. No. Class & Course Total number of lectures Allocated Self- appraisal Score Verified API Score 1 2 Total C. Course File & Material/Lab Manual Completion (20): (For each Theory Course file (4), Theory Material (10), Lab Course file (2), Lab Manual (4)) S. No. Class & Course Self- appraisal Score Verified API Score 1 2 Total D. Student Feedback (20): (Feedback Scales:1-10, Points: Scale x 2)) S. No. Class & Course Self- appraisal Score Verified API Score 1 2 Average
Heidi Rose Matthew Matell Georgia Papaefthymiou Paul Fazen Amanda Knecht Tim Horner Brianna Remster Timothy Feeman Karen MCKenna Catherine Kerrison Helen Lafferty Nathaniel Weston Joseph Drury Yannik Thiem Gunita Grover Robert Beck Rosalind Kaplan Lynne Hartnett Chiji Akoma Jody Ross Karyn Hollis Chara Armon Andrej Prsa Julie R. Klein Dan Wood Katherine Kurtz Elizabeth Kolsky Emre Cetin Gurer Tim McCall Ellen Bonds Chris Drain Jeffrey Allan Johnson Robert Jantzen Ryan Feigenbaum Douglas Norton William Fleischman Morey Williams James Solderitsch Cheryl J. Carleton Dominic Canzanese Barbara Ott John E. Santomas Kathleen Acker David Jamison Kevin D. Clark Massimo Faggioli Harriet Power Christa Bialka Thomas Way Peter Knapp Stefanie Knauss James Kriesel Lillian Cassel Rebecca Winer Paul Pasles Allison Ann Payne Tomás Hidalgo Nava Cristina Soriano Cristina Soriano Lawrence Cozzens Judith Hadley Amy Fleischer Michelle Dempsey Meredith A MacKenzie François Massonnat Lisa Rodrigues Silvia Nagy-Zekmi Elise Pasles Nathan Corwin
Brooke Hunter Farshid Baghai Dan Wood Brett Wilmot Diane Edelman Charles Ashley Andrew Liu Stephen Sheridan Thomas Busch Sarvesh Kulkarni Danielle N. Johnson Cristina Percoco Keith Henderson Valentina DeNardis Peleg Kremer Barbara Ott Diane Warchola Meghan Rego Chris Schmidt Mary Mullen Dave Mesing Andrew Liu Noreen Cameron Benjamin H. Baker Theodore Arapis Nancy Sharts-Hopko Kathryn Haymaker Beth Malmskog Elise Pizzi Jeremy P. Carlo Juanita Weaver Gerald Beyer Elayne Howard Carolyn Davis Cathy Stapes
Second Contact/Mid-Point Evaluation: Contact Date: Contact Time: Supervisor’s Name: How Contacted; i.e., Phone, Email: Where Contacted: Summary of progress related to evaluation criteria: Summary of areas to improve: Faculty Supervisor Signature: _________________________________________ Date:__________
Promote use of associated Faculty guidance ie links with Faculty Core and Professional Curricula ,signposts to RPS accredited education and training resources Principle 2 Delivery of a range of learning and development experiences for pharmacists seeking to demonstrate competence and professional development that maps to the APF and associated Faculty guidance Examples of training materials including training programmes (eg face to face, distance learning materials, online training), training (eg study days, symposia, conferences)events Reference to the Faculty core and advanced curricula Contributes and demonstrates learning against the Faculty curricula Maps to other RPS frameworks eg Foundation Pharmacy Framework(FPF), Leadership Development Framework Principle 3 Provision of infrastructure and resources to deliver the training that leads to the advancement of practice and fulfilment of assessment criteria for Faculty membership Credentials of the learning and development team and team delivering training Trainers, tutors, mentors (members of the Faculty where appropriate) Support resources for learning and development team Facilities and resources eg administration/ personnel team Data protection & governance (data security) Examples of learning plans / learning outcomes Principle 4 Assurance of support and development for all learners Clear learning outcomes Quality assurance processes in place Alignment of the support and development with the APF clusters Benefits to learners clearly described Learning is delivered by experts (with evidence) Principle 5 Demonstrates assurance of the Involvement of experts in education, training and
Oklahoma State University – Center for Health Sciences Work Effort Summary Name: Date: Department: Time period covered: A. TEACHING ACTIVITIES Medical School Courses (OSU-COM): Lecture (Hours) New Revised Repeated Lab (Hours) Quizzes, Exams & Reviews (Hours) Small Group (Hours) Facilitator / Simulation (Hours) Course Coordinator (Hours) Educational Advisor / Mentor (Number of students) Graduate School Courses (OSU-CHS): Lecture (Hours) New Revised Repeated Lab (Hours) Quizzes, Exams & Reviews (Hours) Small Group (Hours) Facilitator (Hours) Course Coordinator (Hours) Educational Advisor / Mentor (Number of students) Primary preceptor numbers: (primary = evaluation completed) Number /year OSU Student Clinic Teaching OSU Student Hospital Teaching OSU Resident Teaching
Undergraduate Studies Committee – noted one person may be listed on the committee incorrectly – Check whether Severine Patanakul (BUS) should be Peerasit Patanakul (BUS). Unfinished Business Constitution Revisions – L. Aronne brought to Council for a vote for approval to bring revisions to faculty organization for a vote. - no major content changes from spring version - the order was modified to flow better. - change of name from Faculty Organization to Faculty Senate to be more consistent with other campuses of Penn State. – Discussion of why ours were different. - Question on make up of Faculty Organization of all staff with faculty - issue of percentages for voting – - Several specific suggestions were made to the revised document (Version 9/11/15): Article 1 – name – fix to Faculty Senate Article II – section on student representation – how to make more specific which student is the representative on specific committee– Article 7 – section 5c -- suggestion that this is procedural and the SGA president should provide Chair the assignments Article IV - Section 8 – add “senators” to nominations Section 3 - membership – correct to “chairs of faculty council standing committees”. Section 3 – consider – the Faculty Council – add in the Executive board of the Faculty senate to clarify – specify that the administrators are non-voting ex officio; add Past Chair as non-voting ex-officio member Section 8 Past Chair – add as part of the Faculty Council? Recommend as a non-voting ex-officio Article VII Section 1a. Spell out the abbreviations for P & T Discussion on i), ii) and iii) – suggestion on wording is unclear; --change “at least” to “each of the” Section 2h - – ADD - under Director of Learning Resource Center as a ex officio member Section 3 – Discussed time limits for ad hoc committees. The discussion concluded with the idea that although when a committee is formed it should have a clear time line and charges. However, that is a procedure and as such should not be in the constitution. Article X – Section 3 – propose to remove word “Electronic” from sentence 1. Discussed an inconsistency for the title - “Chair of Faculty Senate” or “Faculty Council Chair” or “the Chair” – e.g., article IV – old section 5 new 3. The decision was to change all to “the Chair.” At beginning add note – hereafter refer to
Motion to approve the formation of the committee was presented by R. Weissbach and seconded by C. Nagle. The motion was approved unanimously. The approved version is “Appendix 1.” There was a question raised on would this be followed by all schools – L. Aronne said it would be good to have consistency across schools. v. Research – John Steffen – summarized the research committee minutes; all members were present at the meeting 1) Representation at the Faculty council meeting 10/19 2) Discussed current charges – also discussed an additional charge to develop guidelines on awards 3) 2014-15 research committee final report – was discussed. 4) Discussion of the current sabbatical applications and the criteria for review. The committee will develop guidelines on what the criteria are 5) Set date for next meeting vi. Scholarship and Awards – Courtney Nagle - met with Lindsey Shaffer re. deadlines; committee met to discuss dates for awards; announcements will be sent out vii. Student Life – Papiya Bhattacharjee - Minutes were submitted from the committee and will be available on line. - The committee discussed their charges. They will also address retention from the student perspective. They will also consider how to provide help to faculty to deal with international students. - Members have formed subcommittees to look at the 4 charges; they are gathering data from Ken Miller on student retention; they may send survey to students who went to UP; - R. Ford commented – the campus will be receiving some of the international student fees so will have some funding to help. viii. Undergraduate Studies – Kathy Noce – not present – no report – minutes will be posted ix. Engineering Representative – Rob Weissbach – no report Representatives Part-Time Faculty Representative – Renee Finnecy and Jennifer Mangus – not present ii. Senate Representative – Sudarshan Nelatury – - E-lion is being replaced with Lion Path - Angel is being replaced with Canvas - General education – there was discussion of changing some of the skills; new proposal to have a “c” or better in foundation courses – still in draft form; discussion of online vs face-to-face gen ed changes
XAVIER UNIVERSITY, ODISHA (Established by Xavier University Act 4 of 2013) Application Form XAVIER LAW SCHOOL Xavier University Bhubaneswar, Xavier City Campus, Plot No:12(A), Nijigada, Kurki, Harirajpur-752050, Dist.-Puri, Odisha, No. : 01-XLS2018 Registration Number (For Office use Only) --------------------------- Paste your recent, color, passport size photograph here *1. Details of Bank payment (Optional, Please check the relevant Advertisement) DD Number Date Amount Name of the Bank DD issuing branch’s name Providing the information sought below with * symbol are compulsory. Failing which the application may get rejected. *2. Name of the post applied for 3. Applicant’s area of specialization Personal Details *4. Name (in Capital Letters) First Name Middle Name Surname *5. Date of birth Day Month Year Age as on date of advertisement 6. Place of birth City / Village/State/Country *7 Email Id *8. Father’s name *9. Mother’s name *10 Nationality *11 Gender Male / Female/Others *12 . Community/Category (delete the ones not applicable) Gen/SC / ST / OBC / Other Categories If other category:- Give details 13. Marital status Married / Unmarried If married, name of spouse *14 . If physically disabled, indicate the relevant particulars If applicable, Write ‘yes’ Percentage of Disability S.No. of Proof enclosed a. Blindness or low vision: b. Hearing impairment c. Locomotor disability or cerebral palsy (includes all cases of orthopaedically handicapped)
policies and procedures related to faculty, including promotion and tenure guidelines. This document is available online at . As a UAB employee, you will also be subject to the terms and conditions in the You & UAB Handbook although the terms of the Faculty Handbook take precedence to the extent of any conflict. You & UAB can be found online at . [Restate duties, responsibilities, and expectations for this faculty appointment]. As is the case for all University employees, your employment is subject to approval by the Provost and President. As a condition of your employment, you are subject to all applicable practices, policies and procedures of the Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama, including but not limited to policies regarding conflicts of interests, nondiscrimination, outside professional activities, and intellectual property. It is your responsibility to be aware of these policies and procedures, as well as all others which may apply to you. University policies and procedures are subject to change without notice. You are an important member of the Department of (insert department name). The faculty and I sincerely hope that you will agree to continue in your current position. If, as I hope, you find this offer to be satisfactory as presented, please indicate your acceptance by signing, dating, and returning this original letter to (insert department name) (insert contact person’s name as is appropriate), (insert address) no later than (insert date). [Alternate sample language-- closing] Thank you for your contributions to the Department of (insert department name) and to the (insert college or school name) at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. I look forward to working with you and your colleagues to continue to build the excellent programs of the department. Sincerely, __________________________________ _________________________ Chair Dean I accept all the terms and conditions of this offer. _________________________________ __________________________ (Signature) (Date) [Include other departmental, school/college signatures and approvals as is appropriate]
3. 4. Will the adjunct faculty member ever work in patient care areas? Type X’s in applicable boxes. No Yes – Will provide patient care or clinical services as part of faculty practice responsibilities Yes – Will supervise students in patient care areas Yes – Will write prescriptions What are the individual’s qualifications for the appointment and work assignment? Highest Degree and Discipline Professional Credentials Professional Licensure Other Qualifications What will be the financial compensation for the work assignment? Type X in one box. If “Paid,” provide the compensation per semester. Unpaid / volunteer Paid Compensation per Semester $ From which fund(s) will this adjunct faculty member be paid? Type the account number(s) and the percentage allocated from each account, if applicable. Percentages must total 100%. Fund 1 % % Fund 2 % % Other Information or Comments Name of Requester Contact Person (if different from the Requester) Save a copy of this request for your file. Then, email an electronic copy of the request along with a copy of the faculty member’s current CV or resume to and . Approval/Additional Comments (for Office of the Dean’s use)
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY DEAN OF FACULTIES FACULTY BIOGRAPHY FACULTY BIOGRAPHY (LIMIT TO 200 WORDS) FACULTY BIOGRAPHY (LIMIT TO 200 WORDS) Dr. John Smith received his Ph.D. in Organic Chemistry from Texas A&M University in 2007. Dr. Smith joined the Chemistry Department at Texas A&M University as an Assistant Professor in 2011. Dr. Smith teaches graduate and undergraduate courses in analytical, inorganic and organic chemistry. He developed an undergraduate chemistry course and made significant curriculum changes to several courses in the department. Dr. Smith’s research focuses on surface science with a specialization in charge transport. He has received over $1.2 million in external research funding from the National Institute of Health and the National Science Foundation. Dr. Smith is an associate editor of three top-tier journals. He has written 37 peer-reviewed journal articles, two book chapters, and was the keynote speaker at the National Chemistry Conference. Dr. Smith has chaired four doctoral committees, six mater’s committees, and served on seven others. Dr. Smith received the CAREER award from the NSF in 2009.
Program Update July 2015 FACULTY CLUSTER HIRES Office of the Provost Program Update Program Description The Office of the Provost announced the Faculty Cluster Hires Program in FY12-13. This initiative provided an opportunity to invest in areas that spanned multiple disciplines and contributed to Purdue’s national and global leadership. Proposals were approved for clusters in areas of existing strength or in emerging areas of significance. The goal of this initiative was to position the University for growth in the discovery enterprise, to attract faculty who would train the interdisciplinary faculty/scholars of the future, and that would attract students, other faculty, and staff who will define the disciplines of tomorrow. Approved clusters were designed to attract: Faculty who could be jointly appointed by at least two colleges or distinct disciplines Faculty whose work will enhance an existing strategic Purdue strength, or Faculty who together create an emerging multi-disciplinary cluster of distinction. Proposal and Approval Process Cluster proposals included: Up to six faculty lines Faculty from at least two different colleges or distinct academic disciplines A list of search committee members who would represent all participating units in the cluster A completed Cluster Hire Proposed Funding Plan Designated faculty lead or contact Targeted outcomes (e.g., a new center, degree program or major grants). Evidence of how the proposed cluster would enhance Purdue’s reputation as a global leader in either the emerging or existing strength. Financial Resources Each proposal included a completed Cluster Hire Proposed Funding Plan with the estimated salary costs of the proposed hire(s) as well as anticipated start-up costs. Start-up funding is subject to the same reporting and expenditure policies as established for the annual allocations from the Provost Faculty Start-up Fund. The funding plans included both the request for Provost funding and the support that was provided by the participating units. All units participating in this program were expected to contribute to the proposal costs. In addition, funding plans may have incorporated resources from other programs that support faculty hiring (e.g. Leading Faculty Program, Strategic Hiring Initiative, Bridge Fund, etc.) Due to the anticipated uniqueness of each proposal, funding plans were considered on a case by case basis to allow maximum opportunities. All funding allocated for the Faculty Cluster Hires Program have been committed to currently approved clusters. Awards Fourteen clusters have been awarded. Approved clusters include: Epigenetics iSTEM Health Next Generation Manufacturing Integrated Imaging Predictive Science Computational and Systems Biology Big Data Animal Welfare Science Sustainable Communities Nanotechnology Autism AMO Physics Methodologies for Social, Behavioral, and Heath Sciences
Faculty Council Meeting Minutes Monday 13 October 2014 – Glenhill Farmhouse Memorial Room Present: D. Williams, V. Kazmerski, L. Aronne, G. Walters, K. Danvers, T. Mastroberadino, D. Bechtold, A. Combs, B. Potter, D. Birx, D. Blasko Call to Order – Darren Williams, Faculty Council Chair – 8:04 a.m. Approval of minutes from last Faculty Council meeting - Monday September 15, 2014 - Motion to approve – L. Aronne, second by A. Combs, approved Chancellor - Don Birx - Associate Dean search update; no national search at this time; positive response to email request asking about extending D. Blasko’s interim appointment - School of Science Director search update - moving forward; review of apps in November - “Women’s Issues” group – D. Birx provided background information on the committee; There was discussion about how the group will work with the Institutional Equity and Diversity Committee - Budget - things are improving across campuses; funding improving; Reports of Officers and Standing Committees Officers Faculty Council Chair - Darren Williams - Vice Chair search update – L. Aronne introduced as Vice Chair and Parliamentarian - Best electronic polling practices - investigate Angel to conduct future elections; need for date/time stamp. D. Williams to talk with Xi Dunsworth - Revision of the Behrend Constitution in progress (e.g., separation of Vice Chair and Parliamentarian, P&T guidelines – see Appendix 1) - work through the leadership team of Faculty Council - Suggestion to offer a Help Session for writing of narrative statements ii. Secretary Vicki Kazmerski – no report Committees Academic Computing - George Walters - October 6 meeting summary (see Appendix 2) - Classroom technology – discussion that the issue is being addressed by the Undergraduate Studies Committee as well so there is a need for coordination between the two committees, issues of classrooms in the new building and the replacement of clickers with phone apps Athletics –represented by Alternate Adam Combs – - Golf course will be closing to save the maintenance costs
Medical student rotations Graduate student trainees Postgraduate medical education (graduate & continuing medical education) Postdoctoral trainees Invited Lectures Year(s) Title Location International National Regional/Local Technological and Other Scientific Innovations Innovation Patent, if any, pending or awarded /If described in print/on web, provide citation Service to the Community Year(s) Role Organization or institution May include a brief, one-sentence description of each role if needed (optional)
Full-Time Faculty Office Phone (562) 985- Office SSPA E-mail address Office Hours Dr. Mary Caputi 4702 237 MW 9:00-10:30, Tu Dr. Christopher Dennis 4897 241 On Leave for Fall 2013 Dr. Larry George 5289 239 MW 2:00-3:00 & by appt. Dr. Cora Goldstein POSC Graduate Coord. 4852 247 Tu 9:00-10:40 Graduate Advising: Th 4:00-5:30 (by ClickBook appt only) Dr. Liesl Haas 5860 233 Tu 10:30-12:00, W Dr. Richard Haesly POSC Internship Advisor POSC Undergrad Advisor (Last names A-H) 4700 245 W 11:00-12:00 Advising: See online ClickBook schedule Dr. Demetra Kasimis 4711 227 MW 11:00-12:00 Dr. Edgar Kaskla 7091 249 M 2:00-3:00, Th & by appt. Dr. William Leiter 4715 338 TuTh 11:00-12:00, W 5:25-6:25pm Dr. Charles Mahoney 8203 229 Tu 1:00-3:00 Dr. Larry Martinez Model UN Director 4713 235 W 2:00-5:00 Dr. Charles Noble 4897 241 MW 9:00-9:30, 10:45-11:30, 3:30-4:00 & by appt. Dr. Amy Cabrera Rasmussen POSC Undergrad Advisor (Last names I-Z) 4719 243 Tu 11:00-12:00 Advising: See online ClickBook schedule Dr. Lewis Ringel Moot Court Director 4708 223 M 9:30-12:30 Dr. Gerry Riposa 7776 FO5- 2132 On Leave for Fall 2013 Dr. Barry Steiner 4961 231 MW 11:00-12:00, Tu 5:30-6:30 Dr. Kevin Wallsten 4709 225 Th 1:30-2:30 Dr. Jason Whitehead Legal Studies Director 4712 251 M 2:00-4:00, Th
VIII. AUTHORIZATION The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of their respective institutions represent that they are duly authorized to do so. Full Name International Institution By: Signature Print Name Print Title Date: The City University of New York Approved as to Form on behalf of CUNY College By: CUNY Office of General Counsel Signature Date: Print Name Print Title Date:
other practices that seriously deviate from those that are commonly accepted within the academic community for proposing, conducting, or reporting research." It does not include honest error, or honest differences in interpretations or judgments of data. Inquiry: The term "inquiry," as stated in the aforementioned regulations and for the purpose of this policy, means "information gathering and initial fact finding to determine whether an allegation or apparent instance of misconduct warrants an investigation." Investigation: The term "investigation," as stated in the aforementioned regulations and for the purposes of this policy, means "formal examination and evaluation of all relevant facts to determine if misconduct has occurred." Complainant: The term "complainant" means the individual who makes the allegation. Respondent: The term "respondent" means the individual against whom the allegation has been made. Whistleblower: The term "whistleblower" refers to a university employee who, in good faith, makes an allegation of wrongdoing. c. Policy Statement Misconduct in research is not consistent with the principles that Ohio University follows in fulfilling its mission of teaching, research, and public service, and will not be tolerated. If allegations of such misconduct are raised, the institution shall conduct a prompt and thorough review and impose appropriate sanctions when the allegation of misconduct has been sustained. Throughout the process the institution will strive to protect due process rights of those accused and, to the maximum extent possible, the privacy of those who in good faith report apparent misconduct. d. Implementation Implementation of this policy shall be performed in a manner consistent with the aforementioned regulations, specifically: Allegations of fraud or misconduct in research, scholarship, or creative activity will be presented to the Vice President for Research. e. Pre-Inquiry Review The Vice President for Research, or his/her designee, will conduct a pre-inquiry review to assist the complainant to formulate as clearly as possible the exact nature of the allegation and to determine if an allegation has any reasonable basis before beginning a formal process of review. In those cases involving allegations that pose threats to the health or welfare of human subjects or other involved persons, a pre-inquiry review may be omitted. Following an informal review with the respondent, if the Vice President or his/her designee determines that the allegation has no merit and/or does not fall under the definition of misconduct in research, the complainant and respondent will be notified of that decision.
Fall Course Manuals Assessment Piece Due Thursday 5-Jan-2017 Last Day of Drop/Add Thursday 12-Jan-2017 MLK Holiday - No Classes Monday 16-Jan-2017 Census Friday 3-Feb-2017 Presidents Day Holiday - No Classes Monday 20-Feb-2017 Midterm Grades Due from Faculty - 3pm Tuesday 21-Feb-2017 Midterm Grades Posted to LeopardWeb - 9am Wednesday 22-Feb-2017 Spring Break Saturday - Friday 6-Mar-2017 to 10-Mar-2017 Last Day to Withdraw from Class with W Grade Tuesday 28-Mar-2017 Last Day of Classes Tuesday 11-Apr-2017 Study Day Wednesday 12-Apr-2017 Final Exam Period Thursday-Wednesday 13-Apr-2017 to 19-Apr-2017 Patriot's Day Holiday - No Classes Monday 17-Apr-2017 Commencement Saturday 22-Apr-2017 Final Grades due from Faculty - 12pm Monday 24-Apr-2017 Spring Course Manuals due to Dept. Chair Monday 24-Apr-2017 Final Grades post to LeopardWeb - 9am Wednesday 26-Apr-2017 Summer 2017 Item Day Date Faculty Days Thursday and Friday 4-May-2017 and 5-May-2017 Day Classes Begin Monday 8-May-2017 Spring Course Manuals Assessment Piece Due Monday 8-May-2017
Fink’s Course Design Model The model establishes course or learning goals, assessment practices (evaluation) and feedback and teaching and learning activities as an inter-dependent triad that can generate synergy when course activities and goals are properly integrated. The Fink model incorporates steps to help instructors consider their audience and establish appropriate course practices that promote student learning honor institutional context, and respect instructor autonomy. Referenced from: the UBC Guide to Teaching for New Faculty Essential Questions for Course Design Consider situational factors. Start by gathering information about the course: the number of students, pre/co-requisites, the students’ prior knowledge and experience, the nature of the course, how it fits into the curriculum or program, the nature of the subject, the culture of the discipline, and expectations of the department and institution. Identify Learning Goals. Once you understand your context then you can identify what you want the students to learn. The learning goals may be constrained by departmental and institutional expectations. Design Feedback and Assessment Activities. You first need to determine what is worth assessing. You must identify strategies to provide feedback to students to help them learn, and decide what evidence you will collect to determine whether students are achieving the course goals. Design Learning Activities. Once you have clear course goals and understand the required assessment and feedback practices you will incorporate in your course, you can then create activities
These changes are proportionate to the relatively broad scope for decision-making and the corresponding higher governance and financial risks in non-government schools. The ‘fit and proper person’ requirements for schools has been expanded to include a requirement that a responsible person is not the subject of, or associated with, specific kinds of adverse findings or other actions taken by a court, tribunal, commission of inquiry, professional discipline body or regulatory authority (in Victoria or elsewhere). The adverse findings or actions relate to: dishonest, misleading or deceptive conduct; or non-compliance with an obligation relating to the provision of education; or a breach of duty (including a duty of disclosure). Minimum standard 15(5)(f) The VRQA may exempt a responsible person from this requirement under Regulation 63. The requirement to satisfy the ‘fit and proper person’ test is ongoing and requires the proprietor to notify the VRQA should a ‘notifiable disclosure event’ occur that affects a responsible person at the school. Minimum standard 15(4) ‘notifiable disclosure event’ is triggered by adverse findings or proceedings for conduct that would mean the ‘responsible person’ is not a ‘fit and proper person’. See also the definition of ‘notifiable disclosure event’ in Regulation 5. The other changes to the minimum standards for registration include: Minimum Standard 12 – insertion of a definition for ‘attending the school’ which provides that the standard for student care, safety and welfare is not limited to school premises (see Definitions section of the Regulations). (CONT.) Minimum Standard 16 – addition of the words ‘and be able to demonstrate how the school’s philosophy is enacted’. Minimum Standard 17– additional requirement for schools to have ‘sufficient controls’ in place to ensure that school property and assets are not distributed or used for the or gain of another person or entity (see Definitions section of the Regulations). The existence of sufficient controls will help the school maintain its not-for-profit status. Minimum Standard 21 – additional requirement for schools to have suitable arrangements in place to comply with guidelines issued by the VRQA. Minimum Standard 22 – requires a school to be conducted within the scope of its registration. (NB: this standard is a restatement of regulation 62 in the Education and Training Reform Regulations 2007). See Schedule 4 to the Education and Training Reform Regulations 2017 for the full list of minimum standards for registered schools. For further information about the Education and Training Reform Regulations 2017, see:
The University of British Columbia and The Faculty Association of The University of British Columbia Re: Faculty Members eligible to vote on Reappointment, Tenure and Promotion For the duration of the Collective Agreement, Article 5.04(b)(ii) and (iii) do not apply and faculty members eligible to be consulted are set to the charts below: Eligible members for votes regarding reappointment Rank/Decision being considered “eligible member” Reappointment of Instructor Associate Professor; Professor; Senior Instructor; Professor of Teaching; Reappointment of tenure track Senior Instructor Associate Professor; Professor; Professor of Teaching Reappointment of tenure track Professor of Teaching Professor; Professor of Teaching Reappointment of tenure track Assistant Professor Associate Professor; Professor; Senior Instructor; Professor of Teaching Reappointment of tenure track Associate Professor Professor; Professor of Teaching Reappointment of tenure track Professor Professor; Professor of Teaching
Thomas Bailey Developmental Ed Support Funds Education Commission of the States $ 60,000 Jeanne Subsidized Housing and Children's Outcomes: Evidence from Housing Lotteries William T. Grant Foundation $13,797 Oren Global Assessment, Local Use: How States Use Results from International Large-Scale Assessments of Education in Policy and Practice Spencer Foundation $ 49,249 Amy Stuart Wells The Public Good The Ford Foundation $ 400,000 Renewal grant monies Project Director Project Title Grantor Grant Thomas Bailey CUNY Start Evaluation MDRC $198,364 Andrew Gordon Neural Predictors of Hand Therapy Efficacy in Children with Cerebral Palsy Winifred Masterson Burke $ 138,661 Ellen Meier Alliance for Learning Environments in STEM City College of New York $ 20,000 Supplement grant monies Project Director Project Title Grantor Grant John Allegrante Sleep Health Education New York University $ 13,392
methane, commonly known as biohythane. The effect of HRT on the total gas production, gas composition and digestate composition on the 1st and 2nd phase will be studied. The T-PAD process will be performed in bench scale reactors and T-PAD mobile unit.
Fall 2017 ENGR 10 Instructors Emails and Office Hours Faculty Email Office Office Hours Ken Youssefi kyoussefi@aol.com E137 MW 10-12 Jack Warecki Jack.warecki@sjsu.edu E137 M 10 – 11, Tu 3-4 Chuck Foster cobrav@mindspring.com Lab 391/393 Lab period or by appointment s_duorah@yahoo.com Lab 391/393 Lab period or by appointment Steve Sepka s.sepka@gmx.com Lab 391/393 Lab period or by appointment javace1us@gmail.com Lab 391/393 Lab period or by appointment Belle Wei Belle.wei@sjsu.edu Lab 391/393 Lab period or by appointment Ahmed Banafa banafa@gmail.com Lab 391/393 Lab period or by appointment Farshid Marbouti farshid.marbouti@sjsu.edu Lab 391/393 Lab period or by appointment Peggy Boylan Ashraf Peggy.boylan-ashraf@sjsu.edu Lab 391/393 Lab period or by appointment Lucero Villanueva Lucero.villanueva@gmail.com Lab 391/393 Lab period or by appointment
Fall 2018 ENGR 10 Instructors Emails and Office Hours Faculty Email Office Office Hours Ken Youssefi kyoussefi@aol.com E137 MW 10-11:30 Jack Warecki Jack.warecki@sjsu.edu E137 W 10-11, T 3-4 Chuck Foster Charles.foster@sjsu.edu Lab 391/393 Lab period or by appointment s_duorah@yahoo.com Lab 391/393 Lab period or by appointment Steve Sepka s.sepka@gmx.com Lab 391/393 Lab period or by appointment javace1us@gmail.com Lab 391/393 Lab period or by appointment Spoorthy Ananthaiah spoorthy.ananthaiah@sjsu.edu Lab 391/393 Lab period or by appointment Ahmed Banafa banafa@gmail.com Lab 391/393 Lab period or by appointment Simon Sorensen Simon.sorense@sjsu.edu Lab 391/393 Lab period or by appointment Saied Rafati Saied.rafati@sjsu.edu Lab 391/393 Lab period or by appointment
Fall 2018 ENGR 10 Instructors Emails and Office Hours Faculty Email Office Office Hours Ken Youssefi kyoussefi@aol.com E137 MW 10-11:30 Jack Warecki jack.warecki@sjsu.edu E137 W 10-11, T 3-4 Chuck Foster charles.foster@sjsu.edu Lab 391/393 Lab period or by appointment smita.duorah@sjsu.edu Lab 391/393 Lab period or by appointment Steve Sepka s.sepka@gmx.com Lab 391/393 Lab period or by appointment javace1us@gmail.com Lab 391/393 Lab period or by appointment Spoorthy Ananthaiah spoorthy.ananthaiah@sjsu.edu Lab 391/393 Lab period or by appointment Ahmed Banafa banafa@gmail.com Lab 391/393 Lab period or by appointment Simon Sorensen Simon.sorense@sjsu.edu Lab 391/393 Lab period or by appointment Saied Rafati Saied.rafati@sjsu.edu Lab 391/393 Lab period or by appointment
Faculty Opportunity Fund Description Eligibility: Any tenured/tenure track Chapman University faculty member can apply. A faculty member is permitted to submit only one proposal each cycle as Principal Investigator (Research Applications) or Faculty Leader (Arts and Humanities Applications). Amount and Duration of Awards: Awards are for up to $15,000 for a period of 12 months. Criteria for Selection: The overall merit of the proposed project will be evaluated by disciplinary panels of faculty reviewers, which are assembled by the Vice President for Research (VPR), Faculty Fellow, and Faculty Research and Development Council (FRDC) Chair, based on relevant expertise. The faculty review panels’ feedback will be used to inform, the VPR, FRDC Chair, and Faculty Fellow in determination of final funding approval. Evaluation criteria include: Merit of the proposed work and quality of the proposal The degree to which the proposed project represents a new research, scholarly or creative direction for the applicant(s) Feasibility that the proposed work will be completed during the award period Potential for enhancing institutional reputation Potential to enhance external funding (if applicable) Reporting Requirements: A brief summary of progress and outcomes will be submitted to the Office of Research after the first six months of the project and at the conclusion of the project. Application Requirements: Cover Page (one page) Project Title Applicant Information List Principal Investigator (Research Applications) or Faculty Leader (Arts and Humanities) and other collaborators Indicate disciplinary and thematic areas to help identify disciplinary panel of faculty reviewers. Project Summary (350 word limit) Provide a description of the project for a non-specialist audience. Include the project’s broad objectives and indicate the importance of the work to the field. Describe the
Dean’s Meeting and Letter to Faculty Member under Review After the committee’s memorandum, the Dean will meet with each faculty member to discuss performance, goals for the coming year, areas for improvement, and him requirements for reappointment or promotion. Faculty will receive a development letter indicating the results of the annual review and recommendations for performance in the coming year. This letter is separate from the salary letter. Table 3. Summary of Annual Review Requirements and Process Review Activities Tenure-Track Practitioner Faculty Research Faculty Non Annual Review: Personnel committee and feedback letter Non-tenured only Assistant level only Assistant level only No Annual Review Materials to be Submitted Senate Form A, Current CV, CV Update form, Personal Statement with Research, Teaching & Service, Teaching Evaluations, Previous Year’s Letter Current CV, CV Update form, Personal Statement with Research, Teaching & Service, Teaching Evaluations, Previous Year’s Letter List ofevaluators??? Current CV, CV Update form, Personal Statement with Research, Teaching & Service, Teaching Evaluations, Previous Year’s Letter Updated CV & Teaching Evaluations only Committee Composition One member of the personnel committee and two tenured members of the augmented personnel committee. One member of the personnel committee and two of the augmented personnel committee or associate/full professors of practice Two Personnel Committee Members (one Tenured and one & one research professor Associate Dean or Dean Chair of Meeting Committee Rotates among tenured PC members Rotates among tenured PC members Rotates among tenured PC members Associate Dean or Dean
4. Academic Preparation (10 points) Earned Doctorate or Highest Degree in Discipline (10 pts) Earned Doctorate out-of-field Master’s Degree with minimum of 18 hours in discipline Approval given by Accrediting Body Approval provided by Letter of Appointment YES NO TOTAL (40 points) II. STUDENT ADVISING AND INVOLVEMENT 20% Criteria Supporting Documents # of Points Exceptional 10-8 Average 7-4 Below Average 3-1 A. Reviewer’s Comments on Student Advising and Involvement: 1. Student Organization/Activities Involvement (10 points) Sponsor of student organizations (Exceptional) – Participation in student activities (Average to Below Average) Student publications and conference participation YES NO 2. Student Advising (10 points) Advising Load and Effectiveness (List of Advisees) Career Guidance (Include letters of recommendation written for students/alumni) Graduate School and Career Guidance Recruiting Activities Student letters of recommendation YES NO TOTAL (20 points) III. RESEARCH AND SCHOLARLY/CREATIVE ACTIVITIES 20%
Online nutrition training For staff and volunteers supporting older people The Tasmanian Commonwealth Home Support Programme (CHSP) Nutrition Service is pleased to offer two FREE online training packages: Nutrition for older people Malnutrition in older people What is it? Interactive training programs with activities, practical tips and ideas. Features videos of Tasmanian CHSP services sharing how they are helping older people. Aims Increase knowledge and skills. Increase confidence in understanding the nutrition needs of clients, and managing common nutrition issues such as malnutrition. Who is it for? All staff and volunteers who work with older people living in the community. How long does it take? About one hour to complete all at once, or they can be broken into shorter sections. Where do I find it? Anyone can access the training on the (dhhs.sproutlabs.com.au/login/index.php ) Create a login, then select the ‘community and cultural care’ folder. The training can be accessed on the as well. There is a link to the interactive version and an ‘accessible’ version which is suitable for people who use reading software. Important notes The training can be completed each year as part of your annual training schedule. Turn off “pop-up blocker”. The training is compatible with PCs or laptops. Accessing via iPad, smart phone or tablet is not recommended. Internet Explorer and Google Chrome are preferred web browsers to access the training.
East Tennessee State University Office of Registrar Academic Regalia Order Form ***You must make payment arrangements with the Office of the Registrar before regalia will be ordered from the vendor. Payments may be made via cash or credit, but not by check. *** Personal and Contact Information Name: Campus Box: Home Address: Campus Phone: Home Phone: Gender: Degree Type: Cap and Gown Measurements (accurate measurements ensure proper gown size): Height: Ft. In. Weight: Cap Size: Check the appropriate regalia: Bachelor: (Mark all items needed) Cap and Tassel $5.00 Bachelor Gown Only $10.00 Bachelor Hood $12.00 Bachelor Unit (includes cap, gown and tassel) $20.00 Master: (Mark all items needed) Cap and Tassel $5.00 Master Gown only $12.00 Master Hood $15.00 Master Unit (includes, cap, gown, tassel and hood) $30.00 Doctor (Mark all items needed) Tassel $7.00 Doctor Gown only $15.00 Doctor Hood $17.00 Tam $12.00 Doctor Unit (includes, gown, tam, tassel and hood) $50.00 LATE FEE (6 weeks prior to commencement) Late Fee $15.00 Degree/School Information Provide the exact name of your degree: ______________________________________________ School Name (which issued your degree) ____________________________________________ School Location (City and State):___________________________________________________
FACULTY REQUEST FOR SERVICE ACTIVITY AND DEVELOPMENT CREDIT FORM, SUMMER 2018 – SPRING 2019 NAME: EMPLOYEE S#: DATE: HOME CAMPUS: DEPARTMENT: CRN# Activity Name Source (drop down) Estimated Completion Term (drop down) # of Credits Requested (drop down) Activity Category (drop down) Joint Project (Yes/No) (drop down) # of Service Credits Completed Notes FACULTY REQUEST FOR SERVICE ACTIVITY AND DEVELOPMENT CREDIT FORM, SUMMER 2018 – SPRING 2019 – Page 2