zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
SHELLBARK HICKORY Carya laciniosa 10-20 60 BLACK WALNUT Juglans nigra 10-20 70 SYCAMORE Platanus occidentalis 10-30 90 KENTUCKY COFFEE TREE Gymnocladus dioicus 5-10 60 AMERICAN ELM Ulmus americana 10-30 80 Understory Trees Common Name Botanical Name Cover % (low-high) Canopy Height (ft) RED ELM Ulmus rubra 10-20 50 OHIO BUCKEYE Aesculus glabra 10-20 40 BLUE BEECH Carpinus caroliniana 10-20 RED MULBERRY Morus rubra 10-20 40 Shrubs Common Name Botanical Name Cover % (low-high) Canopy Height (ft) WAHOO Euonymus atropurpureus 5-10 12 BLADDERNUT Staphylea trifolia 10-20 10 Vines Common Name Botanical Name Cover % (low-high) VIRGINIA CREEPER Parthenocissus quinquefolia 10-20 SUMMER GRAPE Vitis aestivalis 10-20 POISON IVY Toxicodendron radicans 10-20 Forbs Common Name Botanical Name Cover % (low-high) BLUEBELLS Mertensia virginica 10-20 PALE VIOLET Viola striata 5-10 WOOD NETTLE Laportea canadensis 20-30 GOLDENGLOW Rudbeckia laciniata 10-20 WATERLEAF Hydrophyllum virginianum 10-20 FALSE RUE ANEMONE Isopyrum biternatum 10-20 SNOWY CHAMPION Silene nivea 10-20 TOUCH-ME-NOT Impatiens pallida 10-20 Grasses and sedges Common Name Botanical Name Cover % (low-high) HOP SEDGE Carex lupulina 10-30 SQUARROSE SEDGE Carex squarrosa 10-30 SCOURING RUSH Equisetum hyemale 10-30 INDIAN WOODOATS Chasmanthium latifolium 10-30 VIRGINIA WILD RYE Elymus virginicus 10-30 Site Interpretations Wildlife Species This ecological site is a dense, muti-layered forest, with snags and cavities and down dead wood that provides habitat for many species requiring cool, rich, moist conditions.
Talus – rock fragments of any size or shape (usually coarse and angular) derived from and lying at the base of a cliff or very steep rock slope. Terrace – a step-like surface, bordering a valley floor that represents the former position of a flood plain Till – dominantly unsorted and unstratified soil material deposited directly by a glacier Ultic – soil that has a clay-dominated subsoil (argillic horizon) with low amounts of bases such as calcium, and were typically formed under woody vegetation Upland – a general term for the higher ground of a region, in contrast with a low-lying, adjacent land such as a valley or floodplain Wet – a somewhat poorly, poorly or very poorly drained site that has an oversupply of moisture during the growing Woodland – a highly variable vegetative community with a canopy of trees ranging from 30 to 100 percent closure with a sparse midstory and a dense ground flora of grasses, sedges and forbs
Shale – a sedimentary rock formed from clay, silty clay, or silty clay loam deposits and having the tendency to split into thin layers Shallow – a site with bedrock within 20 inches of the surface Shoulder – the slope profile position that forms the convex surface near the top of a hill slope; it comprises the transition zone from summit to backslope Sinkhole – a closed, circular or elliptical depression, commonly funnel-shaped, characterized by subsurface drainage and formed either by dissolution of the surface of underlying bedrock or by collapse of underlying caves within bedrock Summit – the top or highest area of a hillslope Swale –shallow, closed depressions irregularly spaced across a floodplain or terrace with an irregularly undulating surface. Swamp – an area of low, saturated ground, intermittently or permanently covered with water, and predominantly vegetated by shrubs and trees. Talus – rock fragments of any size or shape (usually coarse and angular) derived from and lying at the base of a cliff or very steep rock slope. Terrace – a step-like surface, bordering a valley floor that represents the former position of a flood plain Till – dominantly unsorted and unstratified soil material deposited directly by a glacier Ultic – soil that has a clay-dominated subsoil (argillic horizon) with low amounts of bases such as calcium, and were typically formed under woody vegetation Upland – a general term for the higher ground of a region, in contrast with a low-lying, adjacent land such as a valley or floodplain Wet – a somewhat poorly, poorly or very poorly drained site that has an oversupply of moisture during the growing Woodland – a highly variable vegetative community with a canopy of trees ranging from 30 to 100 percent closure with a sparse midstory and a dense ground flora of grasses, sedges and forbs
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES STATE OF WISCONSIN Division of Medicaid Services Wis. Stat. § 49.45 F-12022 (07/2017) WISCONSIN MEDICAID AND BADGERCARE PLUS MANAGED CARE PROGRAM PROVIDER APPEAL Instructions: Type or print clearly. Refer to the Managed Care Program Provider Appeal Completion Instructions, F-12022A, for more information. SECTION I – PROVIDER INFORMATION 1. Name – Provider Filing Appeal 2. Telephone Number – Provider Filing Appeal 3. Address – Provider Filing Appeal (Street, City, State, ZIP Code) 4. Provider-Secure Email Address 5. The provider has a contractual arrangement with the HMO. Yes No 6. Name – Contact Person 7. Telephone Number – Contact Person 8. Name – BadgerCare Plus / Medicaid SSI HMO Involved SECTION II – MEMBER INFORMATION 9. Name – BadgerCare Plus / Medicaid SSI HMO Member 10. Member ID Number 11. Date(s) of Service SECTION III – DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEM 12. Describe the problem in detail. Use additional paper, if necessary. Attach copies of any supporting documentation relevant to the problem. Continued
Customer Name: Phone: Company Name : Prior to processing any returned unit to Telephonics please complete the following: Is the returned item a Telephonics unit Yes No Is there a PO or Contract No. Yes No If yes, PO/Contract No. Telephonics Part No. Telephonics Serial No. Product Name/Identity Condition of Returned Item Good Fair Poor Qty Returned Warehouse Tracking Information Carrier: Fedex UPS USPS Other If other, please specify: Tracking No.: Import Jurisdiction ITAR License Commerce If license is required, all licensing should be listed on the in-bound paperwork of all ITAR or licensable shipments. License information on the AWB label Yes No Not Applicable License information on the Commercial invoice Yes No Not Applicable For all ITAR or licensed shipments refer to, “To All Shippers /Customers/ Owners of Telephonics Defense Items Located Outside the U.S. Required Shipping Procedures” found at the beginning of this form. Type of Repair US Goods Yes No Repair Yes No Return Yes No Upgrade Yes No Warranty Yes No Non-Warranty Yes No
Table of contents 1 2 1.1 2 2 4 3 6 3.1 6 3.2 9 3.2.1 13 3.3 15 3.3.1 (SEM) 15 3.3.2 (XRF) 16 3.4 16 4 19 4.1 21 5 23 6 24 6.1 24 6.2 24 6.3 26 6.4 27 6.5 28 6.6 29
Subcommittee for Underground transformers and network protectors Introduction/Attendance The Underground Transformers and Network Protectors Subcommittee met at 11 AM on Wednesday October 23, 2013 in the Landmark 5,6 rooms at the Renaissance Grand Hotel in St Louis MO. There were 9 members and 18 guests present. Dan Mulkey Chaired the meeting and George Payerle acted at the Recording Secretary. Minutes from the Munich meeting were reviewed. Brian Klaponski moved and Said Hachichi seconded and the minutes were approved. Alan Trout stated that C57.12.23 single phase submersibles WG will resume in Savannah in March 2014. C57.12.24 Three-Phase Submersible Transformers working group – Giuseppe Termini, Chairman IEEE/PES Transformers Committee Working Group on Requirements for Three-Phase Submersible Transformers (C57.12.24) Meeting Minutes Renaissance Grand Hotel, St. Louis, MO October 21, 2013 Landmark 1 Room Members present Giuseppe Termini – (Chairman) Exelon – PECO Paramjit Bhatia – Moloney Electric Adam Bromley – Fort Collins Utilities Paul Chisholm - IFD Corp Said Hachichi – Hydro Quebec Brian Klaponski - CARTE International Inc. Kent Miller – T&R Electric Charles Morgan – Northeast Utilities Dan Mulkey – PG&E George Payerle – Carte International Inc. Justin Pezzin – IFD Corp. Christopher Sullivan - Heartland Solutions, Inc. Alan Traut – Power Partners Guests present James Aimstions – Siemens *Timothy Albers – ABB Jerry Allen – Metglas, Inc. Kahveh Atef – San Diego Gas & Electric Ed Bertolini – Richards Manfacturing *Mark Bielat – Public Works Commission Rhett Chrysler - Ermco Anil Dhawan – ComEd Ben Ehmcke – Ehmcke Consulting Jean-Francois Gagnon – Siemens Carlos Gaytan – Prolec GE Jack Harley, FirstPower Group Paul Henault – IFD Corp Brian Just – IFD Corp Bob Kinner, FirstPower Group Alejandro Macias - CenterPoint Energy Brian Marquardt – AK Steel Mike Miller – WE Energies Abhinav Mitra – Siemens
Project Name Project Name Proposer Firm Project Number Project Number City, State, Zip Selection Criteria Value Score 1. Firm Location, Workload and Size (Maximum 15 points) a. Proximity of firm to project site Less than miles 5 to miles 2 More than miles 0 b. Amount of fees awarded by Contracting Authority Less than $ 5 $ to $ 2 More than $ 0 c. Number of relevant professionals Less than planning professionals Max = 5 to planning professionals More than planning professionals 2. Primary Qualifications (Maximum 30 points) a. Master planning lead Experience / ability of lead master planner to manage visioning / capital improvement plans 0 - 10 b. Assessment lead Experience / ability of lead to manage assessors of various disciplines 0 - Max = 20 c. Planning staff Experience / ability of planning staff to develop long range master plans 0 - d. Technical staff Experience / ability of assessors to accurately collect data and evaluate systems and components 0 - 3. Sub-Consultant Qualifications (Maximum 10 points) Key discipline leads Experience / ability of all key discipline leads to effectively perform the services 0 - 10 4. Project Team Qualifications (Maximum 15 points) a. Previous team collaboration Less than projects (Low) 0 Max = 5 to projects (Average) 2 More than projects (High) 5 b. LEED* Registered / Certified consultant participation No projects 0 Max = 5 Registered 2 Certified 5 c. Team Organization Clarity of responsibility / communication demonstrated by table of organization 0 - 5 5. Overall Project Team Experience (Maximum 30 points) a. Criteria development and prioritization Performance in establishing owner criteria for capital improvement plans 0 - 10 b. Experience with similar planning projects Less than projects (Low) 0 - 3 to projects (Average) 4 - 6 More than projects (High) 7 - 10 c. Past performance Level of performance as indicated by past evaluations / letters of reference 0 - 10 * LEED = Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design developed by the U.S. Green Building Council Subtotal Notes: Evaluator: Name Signature Date
Project Name Project Name Proposer Firm Project Number Project Number City, State, Zip Selection Criteria Value Score 1. Primary Firm Location, Workload and Size (Maximum 10 points) a. Proximity of firm to project site Less than miles 5 miles to miles 2 More than miles 0 b. Amount of fees awarded by Contracting Authority in previous 24 months Less than $ 2 $ to $ 1 More than $ 0 c. Number of relevant professionals Less than professionals Max = 3 to professionals More than professionals 2. Primary Qualifications (Maximum 30 points) a. Project management lead Experience / ability of project manager to manage scope / budget / schedule / quality 0 - 10 b. Project administration lead Experience / ability to effectively administer project controls and processes 0 - Max = 20 c. Technical staff Experience / ability of technical staff to verify fully coordinated construction documents 0 - d. Construction administration staff Experience / ability of field representative to identify and solve issues during construction 0 - 3. Key Consultant Qualifications (Maximum 20 points) a. Key discipline leads Experience / ability of key consultants to perform effectively and collaboratively 0 - 15 b. Proposed EDGE-certified Consultant participation* One additional point for every 2 percent increase in professional services over the advertised EDGE participation goal 0 - 5 4. Overall Team Qualifications (Maximum 10 points) a. Previous team collaboration Less than sample projects 0 to sample projects 2 More than sample projects 5 b. Team organization Clarity of responsibility / communication demonstrated by table of organization 0 - 5 5. Overall Team Experience (Maximum 30 points) a. Previous team performance Past performance as indicated by evaluations and letters of reference 0 - 10 b. Experience with similar projects / delivery methods Less than projects 0 - 3 to projects 4 - 6 More than projects 7 - 10 c. Budget and schedule management Performance in completing projects within original construction budget and schedule 0 - 5 d. Knowledge of Ohio Capital Improvements process Less than projects 0 - 1 to projects 2 - 3 More than projects 4 - 5 * Must be comprised of professional design services consulting firm(s) and NOT the primary firm ** Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design administered by the Green Building Certification Institute Subtotal Notes: Evaluator: Name Signature Date
1720 STRIP, STERI SKIN CLOSURE 1/4 X 2IN 1 1739 SPONGE, GAUZE STERILE 8 PLY 2IN X 2IN 1 1791 SYRINGE, W/O NEEDLE 5ML 1 1792 SYRINGE, W/O NEEDLE 10ML 1 1796 SYRINGE, W/O NEEDLE 60ML 1 1812 SPONGE, GAUZE TRACH STERILE 6 PLY 2IN X 2IN 1 2298 BLANKET, WARMING FULL ACCESS PEDIATRIC 36IN X 33IN 1 2511 ADHESIVE, LIQUID MASTISOL 2/3 CC AMPULE 1 2523 MASK, PROCEDURE EAR LOOPS 1 2528 OINTMENT, TRIPLE ANTIBIOTIC .9GR 1 25318 WIPE, DISINFECTANT QUAT 15% ALCOHOL SANICLOTH PLUS 6IN 1 25592 SPONGE, GAUZE NONSTERILE 12 PLY 4IN X 4IN 1 2641 MASK, SURGICAL TIE ON ANTI-FOG 1 36584 SCRUB, SURGICAL HAND ALCOHOL AVAGARD W/ MOISTURIZER 500ML 1 40706 WIPE, DISINFECTANT QUAT SANICLOTH 8IN X 14IN 65/CANISTER 1 43691 PAPER, EXAM TABLE BUGS-N-THINGS 18IN X 225FT 1 44372 BAG, SPECIMEN TRANSPORT 6IN X 9IN 1 4602 TRAY, STAPLE REMOVER TWEEZER STERILE 1 56348 GEL, ULTRASOUND AQUASONIC 20G STERILE 1 6052 FORCEP, IRIS 1 6090 SCISSORS, IRIS CURVED 1 6092 SCISSORS, OR SHARP/BLUNT 1
Figure 4: Process time at each employee position with absent Filler Technician ………. 14 Table 1: Average order size at each island with prescription takt time …………………. 11 Order Entry Technician Spaghetti Chart ...………………………………………………. 26 Order Entry Technician Stacked Chart ….………………………………………………. 27 Filler Technician Spaghetti Chart ……………………………………………………..… 28 Filler Technician Stacked Chart …………………………………………………………. 29 Checking Pharmacist Spaghetti Chart …..………………………………………………. 30 Checking Pharmacist Stacked Chart ……………………………………………………. 31 Triage Pharmacist Spaghetti Chart ………………………………………………………. 32 Triage Pharmacist Stacked Chart ...………………………………………………………. 33
Reasons CP (s) FT (s) OE (s) TP (s) Cancellation 0.00 1.06 0.00 0.00 Order Completion 50.00 29.79 2.08 41.67 Insurance 5.00 8.51 22.92 2.08 No Answer 0.00 0.00 4.17 0.00 Order Change 0.00 2.13 10.42 4.17 Order Status 5.00 37.23 25.00 22.92 Page Response 5.00 1.06 0.00 2.08 Question 35.00 20.21 35.42 27.08 Appendix B: Phone Call Analysis (continued) Phone Calls by Position without ‘Order Status’ Calls Position Total Calls Average Duration In Out Percentage Time on Phone/order CP 24 76 9 13 12.06 11.89 FT 80 57.55 24 37 40.20 39.65 OE 51 65.73 24 14 25.63 25.27 TP 44 49.30 15 23 22.11 21.81 Calls recorded by time of day Call Start times Calls Recorded 9:00 - 12:00 97 12:01 - 3:00 65 3:01 - 6:00 39 C: Pharmacy Layout D: Pharmacy Staffing Schedule Time Triage Pharm. Order Entry Tech. Filler Tech. Checking Pharm. Average Patient Orders Received per day Average Prescriptions Received per day 8:00 AM 2.50 14.83 8:30 AM 3.00 9.33 9:00 AM Arrive Arrive 3.67 9.83
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES STATE OF WISCONSIN Division of Health Care Access and Accountability F-13046 (08/15) FORWARDHEALTH ADJUSTMENT / RECONSIDERATION REQUEST Instructions: Type or print clearly. Refer to the Adjustment/Reconsideration Request Completion Instructions, F-13046A, for information about completing this form. The provider is required to maintain a copy of this form for his or her records. SECTION I — BILLING PROVIDER AND MEMBER INFORMATION Indicate appropriate program. BadgerCare Plus / SeniorCare / Wisconsin Medicaid ADAP WCDP WWWP 1. Name — Billing Provider 2. Billing Provider’s Provider ID 3. Name — Member 4. Member Identification Number SECTION II — CLAIM INFORMATION 5. Remittance Advice (RA) or X12 835 Health Care Claim Payment / Advice (835) Report Date, Check Issue Date, or Payment Date 6. Internal Control Number / Payer Claim Control Number Add a new service line(s) to previously paid / allowed claim. (In Elements 7-15, enter information to be added.) Correct detail on previously paid / allowed claim. (In Elements 7-12, enter information as it appears on the RA or 835.) 7. Date(s) of Service From To 8. POS 9. Procedure / NDC / Revenue Code 10. Modifiers 1-4 Mod 1 Mod 2 Mod 3 Mod 4 11. Billed Amount 12. Unit Quantity 13. Family Planning Indicator 14. EMG 15. Rendering Provider Number SECTION III — ADJUSTMENT INFORMATION 16. Reason for Adjustment Consultant review requested (include supporting documentation). Recoup entire payment. Other insurance — dental / pharmacy with OI-P $ . Other insurance — professional / institutional (attach Explanation of Medical Benefits form, F-01234). Copayment deducted in error. Member in nursing home. Covered days . Emergency. Primary payer reconsideration. Correct service line. Other / comments. 17. SIGNATURE — Billing Provider 18. Date Signed 19. Claim Form Attached (Optional) Yes No
APPENDICES Appendix i. – Process Flow Chart Appendix ii. – Discussion of Regression Model Appendix iii. – Gravidity and Parity Appendix iv. – Discharge Process Survey (Patient) Appendix v. – Patient Survey Results Appendix vi. – Provider Survey Appendix vii. – Provider Survey Results Appendix viii. – Process Flow Chart (General) Appendix ix. – Process Flow Chart (Nurses) Appendix x. – Process Flow Chart (OBGYN) Appendix xi. – Process Flow Chart (Pediatrics) Appendix xii. – Provider Survey Results Appendix xiii. – Historical Data (Descriptive Statistics) Appendix xiv. – New Mommy News: Breastfeeding Resources from Erlanger Women’s Services
Appendix U: PICU Weekday vs. Weekend Care Type Distribution Appendix V: Driver Table Drivers Number of Occurrences Total Time (mins) Median Time (mins) Mean Duration (mins) Concurrent Activities MDI 11 205 16 18.64 See Table SVN 43 603 13 14.02 See Table Vent Mgmt 69 686 8 9.94 See Table CPAP/BiPaP 9 86 8 9.56 See Table Comm-All 108 378 2 3.50 N/A Travel 395 401 1 1.02 N/A Equip Set-up 45 319 5 7.09 See Table Lung Cond. 9 111 15 12.33 See Table Appendix W: CPAP/BiPaP Concurrent Activity Distribution CPAP/BiPaP (Sample Size = 9) Concurrent Activity Frequency Pt. Assessment 67% Docum-Billing 56%
[2] B. Lin, J. Nagorka, J. Smith, L. Yee. “Analysis of Patient Admissions to the Adult Medical Observation Unit.” University of Michigan: Ann Arbor. Report. 23 Apr. 2013. [3] J.S. Boudrias, “Employee empowerment: From managerial practices to employees’ behavioral empowerment,” Leadership & Organization Development Journal, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 625-638, 2009. [4] M.K.S. Tan, A. Richardson, “Please do not disturb: Managing interruptions and task complexity,” PACIS 2011 - 15th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems: Quality Research in Pacific, July 2011. [5] F.E. Schmidt, J.H. Rogue, T. Blostica, J. Petersen, C. Rosey. “Effective Medication Reconciliation in the Emergency Department.” Bronson Methodist Hospital: Kalamazoo, MI. Presentation. [6] J. Ham. “Emailing: 9002434%2036abdpn.pdf” T-Sytem, Inc. Personal email (November 26, 2013).
Calculate the slenderness limits See Table B4.1 on page 16.116. For the flanges of I-shape sections r = 0.56 x = 0.56 x = 15.9 For the webs of I-shapes section r = 1.49 x = 1.49 x = 42.3 Step II. Calculate the slenderness ratios for the flanges and webs of W14 x 74 For the flanges of I-shape member, b = bf/2 = flange width / 2 Therefore, b/t = bf/2tf. For W 14 x 74, bf/2tf = 6.4 (See Page 1-2 in AISC) For the webs of I shaped member, b = h h is the clear distance between flanges less the fillet / corner radius of each flange For W14 x 74, h/tw = (See Page 1-2 in AISC) Step III. Make the comparisons and comment For the flanges, b/t < r. Therefore, the flange is non For the webs, h/tw < r. Therefore the web is non Therefore, the section is non Therefore, local buckling will not limit the column strength. 4.7 COLUMN DESIGN The AISC manual has tables for column strength. See page 4-1 onwards. For wide flange sections, the column buckling strength (cPn) is tabulated with respect to the effective length about the minor axis KyLy in Table 4-1.
11/26-11/28 THANKSGIVING 12/1 (M) Provider/Patient Interactions Conrad: 337-344 Boyer and Luftey 12/3 (W) Complications: 130-183 Group 9 leads discussion 12/5 (F) Social Influences on Decision Making Conrad: 409-443 Complications: 187-207 12/8 (M) Structural Influences on Decision Making Clark et al Complications: 208-252 12/10 (W) Film: Big Bucks, Big Pharma 12/12 (F) Review 12/16 (M) 9:30am EXAM 2 Becker and Geer. 1978. “The Fate of Idealism in Medical School.” Pp. 138-143 in Dominant Issues in Medical Sociology, edited by Howard D. Schwartz and Cary S. Kart. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. Boyer, Carol A. and Karen E. Luftey. 2010. “Examining Critical Health Policy Issues within and beyond the Clinical Encounter: Patient-Provider Relationships and Help-Seeking Behaviors.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 51: S80-S93. Bury, Michael. 1982. "Chronic Illness as Biographical Disruption." Sociology of Health and Illness 4:167-182. Chambliss, Daniel. 1999. “What It Means to Be a Nurse.” Pp. 251-262 in Health, Illness, and Healing, edited by Kathy Charmaz and Debora A. Paterniti. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing Company. Charmaz, Kathy. 1991. “Chronic Illness as Interruption,” Pp. 11-40 in Good Days, Bad Days: The Self in Chronic Illness. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press. Clark, Jack A., Deborah A. Potter, and John B. McKinlay. 1991. “Bringing Social Structure Back Into Clinical Decision Making.” Social Science and Medicine 32 (8): 853-866. Conrad, Peter and Kristin K. Barker. 2010. “The Social Construction of Illness: Key Insights and Policy Implications.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 51: S67-S79. Fox, Renee C. 1978. “Training for Uncertainty.” Pp. 189-202 in Dominant Issues in
WHAT HAS LED YOU TO SUBMIT THE CASE TO THE HUB PANEL? Please reflect on: What is going well with the plan? What are the future risks for the child(ren), young person/ family should concerns not be addressed? What are the complicating factors that make the concerns more difficult to deal with? How will progress be made? Panel cut off- Panel meets fortnightly (Wednesday afternoon). Cut off is 12 noon Thursday prior to panel. What happens at the Hub next- The Lead Professional will be invited to the next panel A multi-agency Hub panel will meet to look at all presenting information. Hub panel members will share relevant information. A discussion will take place and Ideas/solutions suggested. Advice and guidance will be provided. Hub panel members may offer to support the lead professional with specific pieces of work. Hub panel members may offer to support or provide an intervention directly to the family & join the on going Child Action Meetings. Hub panel members may suggest that another person/agency may be best placed to take the role of Lead Professional. The Lead Professional will be provided with a “feedback & outcome” form. This will contain discussions and agreed actions.
NURS 557 - Concepts of Practice Transformation 3 NURS 558 - Practice Transformation Project I: Data Collection & Program Design 3 NURS 559 - Practice Transformation Project II: Implementation, Evaluation, Dissemination 3 NURS 562 - Advanced Health Assessment & Differential Diagnosis (includes 1 credit lab) 3 NURS 562 - Advanced Health Assessment & Differential Diagnosis (includes 1 credit lab) 3 NURS 563 - Advanced Pharmacology Concepts & Practice 3 NURS 563 - Advanced Pharmacology Concepts & Practice 3 NURS 565 - Information Management for Clinical Practice 3 NURS 565 - Information Management for Clinical Practice 3 NURS 576 - Organizational Systems & Leadership 2 NURS 576 - Organizational Systems & Leadership 3 NURS 580 - Practicum in Advanced Nursing Practice 1 - 5 NURS 580 - Practicum in Advanced Nursing Practice 1 - 5 NURS 581 - Advanced Physiology & Pathophysiology 3 NURS 581 - Advanced Physiology & Pathophysiology 3 NURS 591 - Mixed Methods for Program Planning, Implementation & Outcome Evaluation 3 NURS 591 - Mixed Methods for Program Planning, Implementation & Outcome Evaluation 2 TOTAL POST-BAC CORE 48 TOTAL POST-BAC CORE 48 Key: Strikethrough indicates courses removed from program requirements. Underline indicates courses added to program requirements.
Belt recipient(s) Client Project Client Contact Date completed Corey Short (green), Joe Silveira (green) Areva () Inventory reduction Stan Kuick, lean programs manager 2008 Kevin Ince (green), Mike Shaw (green) Areva () SAP software add-on development Stan Kuick, lean programs manager 2009 Joel Evans (green) Gesa () Reduction in fraud detection time Jerry Sims, 2009 Matt Carter (black), Ken Idler (black) Sandvik Specialty Metals () Reduction in delivery time variability Orjan Blom, president 2011 Albania Davis (green), Peter Mikkelsen (green) Areva () Improve disposition of obsolete spare parts Stan Kuick, lean programs manager 2011 Lindsay Mahony (black), Paul Nissley (black) Closure () Reduce time for health physicist sample collections Sam Bennikuty, IH manager 2011 Ram Devanathan (green) WSU Tri-Cities business program () Reduce administrative assistant workload Wanda Walters, administrative assistant 2011 Alisa Bonham (green), Curtis Dabb (green) Grace Medical Clinic (Kennewick, WA) Improve patient flow time through the clinic Jean Murrow, Director 2014 Proposal A zero credit hour certificate from WSU will be awarded to a student (or a team of students) upon completion of a Six Sigma project if these criteria are met: (1) in the case of a process improvement project—the client at the outset is not certain what the solution should be to their fundamental
changes that will be required. The FDIS document will go to IEC and will be circulated. The document and comments will be submitted to IEEE and REVCOM for approval. Old Business C57.156 – Patrick McShane noted that promised changes were not made and an annex on fire prevention was removed. There were also wording changes on fire prevention. New Business Phil Hopkinson – Distribution transformers can be made up to 10 MVA and can step up or down between primary and secondary voltages. Do we need a Class 1 power transformer classification? Renewable application transformers are Power, Class 1 transformers. A motion was made to form a joint TF to clearly define the bounds between Power and Distribution transformers, which would include Power Transformers SC, Distribution Transformers SC and Standards SC. It was further noted that C57.12.80 would need to be updated where definitions would be affected. Adjournment The meeting adjourned as scheduled. Attachments –Working Group Meeting Minutes and Agenda Attachment K.2 – F14 PTSC Agenda Attachment K.4.1 – PC57.12.10 Standard Requirements Attachment K.4.2 – PC57.93 Installation Guide Attachment K.4.3.1 – TF IEC 60214-1 / IEEE C57.131 Tap Changer harmonization Attachment K.4.3.2 – WG 60214-2 IEC Tap Changer Part 2 Application Guide Attachment K.4.4 – PC57.140 Evaluation and Reconditioning Guide Attachment K.4.5 – PC57.157 Functional Life DETC Guide Attachment K.4.6 – IEEE / IEC 60076-57-12 Phase Shifting Transformers
Agenda Attendance Approval of Agenda and Previous Minutes – Don Platts Meeting Schedule Chair’s Remarks & Report – Don Platts Vice Chair’s Report – Stephen Antosz Secretary’s Report – Susan McNelly Treasurer’s Report – Gregory Anderson Awards Report – Bill Chiu Administrative SC Meeting Report – Standards Report – William Bartley Editor’s Report – Sanjib Som Unfinished (Old) Business New Business Monday Opening Session Adjournment Thursday Closing Session – April 16, 2015 Chair’s Remarks and Anouncements Meetings Planning SC Minutes & Report – Gregory Anderson Reports from Technical Subcommittees (decisions made during the week) Report from Standards Subcommittee (issues from the week) Liaison Reports Cigre – Raj Ahuja IEC TC14 Technical Advisor to USNC – Paul Jarman Standards Coordinating Committee No. 18 (NFPA/NEC) – Ned Brush Standards Coordinating Committee No. 4 (Electrical Insulation) – Paulette Payne reported by Don Platts New Business (Continued from Monday General Session) Thursday General Session Adjournment Minutes of Technical Subcommittees Bushings SC – Peter Zhao Dielectric Tests SC – Michael Franchek Distribution Transformers SC – Steve Shull Dry Type Transformers SC – Charles Johnson HVDC Converter Transformers & Reactors – Instrument Transformers SC – Ross McTaggart Insulating Fluids SC – David Wallach Insulation – Bruce Forsyth Meetings SC – Performance Characteristics SC – Ed teNyenhuis Power Transformers SC – Joe Watson Standards SC – Underground Trans & Network Protectors SC – Dan Mulkey
Length (10) (10) Paper is at least 10 pages in length, double spaced, 12 font (7) Paper is between 8 and 9 pages in length, double spaced, 12 font (4) Paper is between 6 and 7 pages in length, double spaced, 12 font (1) Paper is 5 pages in length, double spaced, 12 font Content (40) (40) Paper is contains exceptional grammar, punctuation and spelling, and content is well researched and presented (30) Paper is somewhat contains some grammar, punctuation and spelling errors, and content is somewhat well researched and presented (20) Paper is somewhat contains many grammar, punctuation and spelling errors, and content is somewhat well researched and presented (10) Paper is poorly organized, contains many grammar, punctuation and spelling errors, and content is poorly researched and presented References (10) (10) Paper contains at least 8 legitimate references, with no internet websites used (7) Paper contains at least 7 legitimate references, with no internet websites used (4) Paper contains at least 6 legitimate references, with no internet websites used (1) Paper contains 5 or fewer legitimate references, with no internet websites used *Note: Any paper that is less than 5 pages in length will not be graded.* Important: If an exam, quiz or the research paper could not be attended or turned in on time, I require written documentation in advance!!! If these rules are not abided by, make-ups will not be permitted!!! Any excused papers, quizzes, or exams that are 1 week or more overdue cannot be turned in under any circumstances!!!! Grade Distribution: Element Points Each Total Research paper 60 60 8 Quizzes 20 160 3 Exams 70 210 Final Exam 70 70 College Grading Policy (+90% A, 89-80% B, etc.) Plagiarism: Bakersfield College does not tolerate academic misconduct such as plagiarism. If a student’s assignment is found to be copied directly from another source, the instructor reserves the right to award an F to that student for the assignment. Be aware that students’ work can be verified
To get a Stock-Trak account, go to: and look for class name York-ADMS3531C-Fall17 The price is $29.95 in US dollars. For a group just one student registers and pays the fee, and then you decide how to share the cost. Accounts are open for trading beginning on the first 3531 class day. Only 2 student names will appear on the stock trak account. You choose who; it doesn’t really matter. Tentative Course Schedule V1 – subject to change Date Topics and Text Chapters Sept 12 Self Study: Chapter 1 and 2 Trading on Securities Markets, Chapter 3 Bloomberg Terminal (by Xuemei Li from Bronfman Library) Start of Options and Derivatives Chapter 18 Sept 19 Understanding Stocktrak Trading Platform Equity Evaluation Models, Chapter 16 Sept 26 -taught by Semih Yildirim Return and Risk: Analyzing the Historical Record, Chapter 4 Oct 3 Options and Other Derivatives Market, Chapter 18 Oct 10 Option Valuation, Chapter 19 Capital Allocation to Risky Assets, Chapter 5 Oct 17 Optimal Risky Portfolios, Chapter 6 Review for the Midterm Exam Oct 21 Midterm exam, 2:00-5:00, Covers Ch 1, 2, 3, 4, 16, 18, 19, not 5, 6 Oct 24 The Capital Asset Pricing Model, Chapter 7 Oct 31 Market Efficiency, Chapter 9 Nov 7 Behavioural Finance and Technical Analysis, Chapter 10 Nov 14 Bond Prices and Yields, Chapter 12 Nov 21 The Term Structure of Interests, Chapter 13 Nov 28 Managed Funds, Chapter 23 The Final Exam will be scheduled by the Registrar’s Office.
FALL 2017 SCHEDULE OF CLASSES August 21 – December 16, 2017 September 4 – Labor Day October 9-10 – October Break November 22-25 Thanksgiving Break DAY CLASSES 16 Weeks: August 21, 2017 – December 16, 2017 COURSE CRN COURSE NAME DAY TIME INSTRUCTOR LOCATION MGMT 20000 (3 cr) 71799 Introductory Accounting – Last Offering (P: None) TH 11:00 AM – 1:50 PM Tammy Wolf T&RC Room B TECH 12000 (3 cr) 71800 Design Thinking in Technology (P: None) W 11:00 AM – 1:50 PM Stewart Bauserman T&RC Room B TLI 11100 (3 cr) 71801 Introduction to Manufacturing and Supply Chain Systems (F: IT 10400 – P:None) F 11:00 AM – 1:50 PM T&RC Room B TLI 23500 (3 cr) 71802 Intro to Lean and Sustainable Systems (F: IT 21400 – P: None) M 11:00 AM – 1:50 PM Clay Huenemann T&RC Room B OLS 46700 (3 cr) 71803 Service Learning (P: OLS 38600 or TLI 25400) S 9:00 AM – 12:00 PM Stewart Bauserman T&RC Room B SIA Building Key: T&RC = Training and Reception Center TTC = Technical Training Center Rooms are subject to change at any time. **Last offering for this course! Please discuss your options with your SSC. EVENING CLASSES 16 Weeks: August 21, 2017 – December 16, 2017
2017 Fall Soccer - Snack and Drink Schedule RUG RATS ____________________ We have xx Players on Our Team Event/Date Field / Notes Drinks & Snacks Week 1 - Opening Day Saturday, September 16 Get “FREE” Tickets ahead of time at Snack Shack – Donuts, Milk Arrive 7:45 AM for Parade Crazy Sock Day GAME: Time/Field Week 2 - Picture Day Saturday, September 23 GAME: Time/Field Family Picnic Movie Night Friday, September 29 Get “FREE” Tickets ahead of time at Snack Shack- Popcorn, Drinks Green Ball Field 5 Picnic 5:30pm Movie 6:30pm Week 3 Saturday, September 30 Arrive Early for Pictures Pix Time: _______ Station: _______ GAME: Time/Field Week 4 Saturday, October 07 GAME: Time/Field Week 5 Saturday, October 14 GAME: Time/Field Coaches Game & Dinner Trunk or Treating & Raffle Friday – October 20 Get “FREE” Tickets ahead of time at Snack Shack – Pizza, Drinks 6:00 PM - Food 6:30 PM - Game Week 6 Saturday, October 21 GAME: Time/Field Week 7 Saturday, October 28 GAME: Time/Field Week 8 Saturday, November 04 GAME: Time/Field Park Closed to Soccer Saturday – November 11 No Practice/ No Games No Practice/ No Games Week 9 Closing Day & Tournament Finals Saturday, November 18 Pass out pictures/plaques GAME Time/Field:
Class Honor Policy Statement I trust every student in this course to fully comply with all of the provisions of the UVA honor system. That institution is one of the glories of Mr. Jefferson's University, and provides important benefits to the whole community. Each of us has an obligation to help maintain it. On every exam, please write "Pledged", and sign your name. On every homework assignment you hand in, please write "Pledged". If you work with a Study Group, each member of your Study Group should sign beneath it. In addition to pledging that you (or your Study Group) have neither received nor given aid while taking your exam or doing your homework, your signature also affirms that you have not accessed anyone else’s notes, study outlines, problem sets, old exams, answer keys, or the textbook while taking an exam, and that you have not obtained any answers from another student's exam. Plagiarism is an Honor offense. The Honor Committee provides a very straightforward discussion, "Fraud and the Honor System", at: www.virginia.edu/honor/proc/fraud.html If, in my judgment, it is beyond a reasonable doubt that a student has committed an honor violation with regard to a given exam, that student will receive an immediate grade of 'F' for that exam, regardless of any subsequent action taken by the Honor Committee. Simon Anderson
[TO BE ENGROSSED ON COUNCIL LETTERHEAD] [Date] [Name] [Address line 1] [Address line 2] Dear [name] REVOCATION OF NOTICE UNDER THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN PUBLIC HEALTH ACT 2011 The [insert Council name] previously issued you with a [Notice pursuant to section 92(1) or* an emergency notice pursuant to section 92(6)] of the South Australia Public Health Act 2011 (‘the Act’) [which was subsequently confirmed in writing by Notice – include this for emergency notice only] dated [date], notice number [notice reference number] (‘the Notice’). The Notice was issued to you in your capacity as [insert detail recorded in Notice – for example – the owner of the land situated at (insert address)]. It required you to take certain action that was reasonably necessary to [insert detail, for example: secure compliance with your obligation under [insert details of relevant requirement imposed under the Act]. or* avert, eliminate and/or minimise the risk to public health arising from [insert details, for example – the state of disrepair of the septic tank located on the premises]. *Delete options that are not applicable I write to inform you that circumstances have now changed such that the Council considers the Notice is no longer warranted. Specifically, [insert reasons for Notice being revoked, for example – the septic tank has been emptied and is no longer in use since an alternative waste control system has been installed on the premises]. Accordingly, you are hereby notified that pursuant to section 92(9) of the Act, the Notice is revoked effective immediately. Notwithstanding the revocation of the Notice, you are still required to comply with your obligations under the South Australian Public Health Act 2011 and Regulations. Any failure by you to do so may result in the Council again taking enforcement action against you. Please contact the Council on [insert number] if you have any questions regarding the above, including in relation to your obligations under public health legislation. Signed: as delegate for the Council [name] [position] [TO BE ENGROSSED ON COUNCIL LETTERHEAD]
Development of PC 57.153 Guide for Paralleling Transformers - Tom Jauch No meeting was held. Development of PC57.156 Guide for Transformer Tank Rupture Mitigation of Power Transformers and Reactors - Peter Zhao Working group did not meet. Development of PC57.157 Guide for Conducting Functional Life Tests for De-Energized Tap Contacts - Phil Hopkinson Working group did not meet. Task Force on V/Hz Curve – Joe Watson A formal meeting was not held, and meetings minutes were not submitted. Joe Watson reported that the TF determined that a guide is needed to address V/Hz issues to promote standardization. Joe Watson moved to form a TF to develop a PAR. The motion was seconded by Gail Kennedy. The motion passed with a few abstentions and none opposed. Task Force on Condition Assessment Guide – Brain Sparling See details of meeting minutes in Attachment K.4.13. Brian Sparling reported that a meeting was held with 122 attendees of which 67 requested membership. The TF scope was discussed, after which a sub-task force with 22 members was created to develop and define scope to be submitted to SC before the S18 meeting. S18 meeting will include discussion about data quality as well as presentation from EPRI about their work in this regard. Old Business None New Business The joint IEC/IEEE Standard requirements for phase shifting transformers document revision will start in IEC, this is IEEE C57.155. Paul Jarman made a motion to form a TF to determine the scope for revising C57.155. Motion was seconded by Craig Colopy and the motion passed unanimously. Peter Zhao requested closer cooperation between various WG’s and TF’s when updating documents so that bushings are considered. . Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at approx. 2:20 pm Attachments –Working Group Meeting Minutes and Agenda Attachment K.2 – F17 PTSC Agenda Attachment K.4.2 – PC57.93 Installation Guide Attachment K.4.4.2 – WG 60214-2 IEC Tap Changer Part 2 Application Guide Attachment K.4.7 – PC57.148 Control Cabinets Attachment K.4.8 – C57.150 Transportation Guide Attachment K.4.13 – Task Force on Condition Assessment Guide Attachment K.2
Table 1 Quantitative Sensory Testing Left Right Dermatome Cold Perceptual Threshold Trial 1 Cold Perceptual Threshold Trial 2 Cold Perceptual Threshold Trial 3 Average Cold Pain Threshold Trial 1 Cold Pain Threshold Trial 2 Cold Pain Threshold Trial 3 Average Comments: e.g., modality mismatch/paradox TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Add additional rows as needed
Table 2 Quantitative Sensory Testing Table Left Right Dermatome Heat Perceptual Threshold (Trial 1) Heat Perceptual Threshold (Trial 2) Heat Perceptual Threshold (Trial 3) Average Heat Pain Threshold (Trial 1) Heat Pain Threshold (Trial 2) Heat Pain Threshold (Trial 3) Average Comments: e.g., modality mismatch/paradox TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Add additional rows as needed MECHANICAL VIBRATION PERCEPTUAL THRESHOLD Frequency of vibration used (include units): N/A Table 3 Frequency of vibration used Left Right Dermatome Vibration Perceptual Threshold (Trial 1) Vibration Perceptual Threshold (Trial 2) Vibration Perceptual Threshold (Trial 3) Average Dermatome (Vibration Perceptual Threshold (Trial 1) Vibration Perceptual Threshold (Trial 2) Vibration Perceptual Threshold (Trial 3) Average Comments: e.g., perception of vibration in remote dermatomes? TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Add additional rows as needed
ORGANISATION Details Organisation Name UKAS Ref (Existing Customers Only) Please indicate the field(s) of calibration and all the measurement parameters for which you seek UKAS Accreditation. No. Field of Calibration Measured Quantity Range or Instrument Calibration and Measurement Capability1 Brief description of Measurement and Equipment used Please indicate [with a *] on the details above any calibrations you carry out at customers’ sites, or in temporary or mobile facilities. Please also indicate the type of site (e.g. mobile facility) and locations. Your quality system and procedures must clearly indicate how you ensure that such work carried out away from your permanent premises meets the requirements of the standard. 1Expressed as an expanded uncertainty (k = 2) i.e. providing a level of confidence of approximately 95%.
Documentation ‘Check’ if supplied Justification for non-submission Details of internal quality control i.e. intercomparisons External inter-laboratory comparisons Training records of relevant staff Complete records of a sample job including your draft certificate Other (please state) Declaration: I declare that I am authorised, on behalf of the company, to submit this application, and that the information contained herein is both correct and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief. If this application relates to an extension to scope, I understand and accept that an assessment fee will normally be charged for the extension to scope, and it may be necessary to revise our annual fees upon grant of the extension to scope. By submitting this application I acknowledge that I have read, understood and accepted UKAS’ . Name: Position: Date: Applications to be Submitted To: EMAIL: POST: Applications Unit, United Kingdom Accreditation Service, 2 Pine Trees, Chertsey Lane, Staines-upon-Thames, TW18 3HR
Page Pre-Laboratory Preparation 3 Laboratory Rules 3 Make the Most Out of Your Time in the Laboratory 4 Collection and Analysis of Experimental Data 5 Error Analysis of Experimental Data 9 Linear Regression and Matrix Algebra 11 Laboratory Notebook 16 Laboratory Report 17 Oral Presentation 23 EXPERIMENTS Experiment #1 – Gas Absorption Column, Pressure Drop 25 Experiment #2 - Extended Surface Heat Transfer 29 Heat Transfer Along a Cylindrical Fin Experiment #3 - Gas Membrane Separation 35 Experiment #4 - Double Pipe Heat Exchanger 42 Experiment #5 – Boiling Heat Transfer 47 Experiment #6 – Unsteady State Heat Transfer 54 Experiment #7 – Batch Reactor 58 Appendix A – ’s Method for Systems of Nonlinear Algebraic Equations 63 Appendix B – Temperature Measurements with Labview 68 Appendix C – DAC Express Operation Procedure 74 PARTICIPATION IN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY The Chemical Engineering Laboratory course has been set up as an open-ended learning experience rather than the traditional data sheet oriented laboratories you may have had in other courses. You will normally receive assignments in the form of memos, and you are expected to respond with reports as might be written if you were working in industry.
table. If the “t-stat” is larger than the tabulated values, then the correlation is significant. In this latter test the “t-stat” is the ratio of the absolute value of (slope – 0)/( standard error of slope). You are using the student-t test to see whether the slope is significantly different from zero. Figure (1) shows a plot of Pressure Drop versus Gas Velocity and the straight line relationship. Table (1) Pressure Drop versus Gas Velocity Data X Y Gas Velocity Pressure Drop ft/sec inches water 1 4 2 5 3 7 4 8 5 6 6 9 7 11 8 10 9 14 10 15 Table (2) Regression Analysis Results SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.946219042 0.895330476 Adjusted 0.882246785 Standard Error 1.257703535 Observations 10 ANOVA df SS MS F Significance F Regression 1 108.2454545 108.245455 68.4310345 3.43E-05 Residual 8 12.65454545 1.58181818 Total 9 120.9 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% Intercept 2.6000 0.8592 3.0262 0.0164 0.6187 4.5813 X Variable 1 1.1455 0.1385 8.2723 0.0000 0.8261 1.4648
[Insert local quote] “Our students and instructors should be very proud of the work they are doing. We’ve set a very high bar for our teacher prep program and CAEP Accreditation validates the hard work we are doing,” said [Local Program Administrator]. “Our students and their families are investing in an education program that is designated as nationally accredited for teacher preparation.” [Local Program] joins 51 other providers to receive accreditation this fall, bringing the total number to 196 CAEP-accredited providers from 40 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. The class of fall 2018 is listed below: Appalachian Bible College – West Virginia Baldwin Wallace University – Ohio Ball State University – Indiana Bethune-Cookman University – Florida Black Hills State University – South Dakota Boston College – Massachusetts Capella University – Minnesota Concordia College – New York Creighton University – Nebraska Dave & Elkins College – West Virginia Eastern Illinois University Hampton University – Virginia Hastings College – Nebraska Henderson State University – Arkansas John Brown University – Arkansas Lindsey Wilson College – Kentucky Louisiana State University at Alexandria Louisiana Tech University Manhattanville College – New York MidAmerica Nazarene University – Kansas Midwestern State University – Texas Missouri Baptist University Mount Saint Mary College – New York Northern Kentucky University North Greenville University – South Carolina Notre Dame College – Ohio Ohio Valley University – West Virginia Oklahoma Baptist University Plymouth State University – New Hampshire Roosevelt University – Illinois Sacred Heart University – Connecticut Southern Arkansas University Southern Nazarene University – Oklahoma Southwestern College – Kansas Spring Arbor University – Michigan SUNY Cortland – New York Tennessee Technological University Trine University – Indiana Universidad de Puerto Rico – Rio Piedras University of Alaska Fairbanks University of Bridgeport – Connecticut University of Missouri-Kansas City University of Nebraska Lincoln University of Nebraska at Kearney University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill University of Saint Joseph – Connecticut University of South Carolina Upstate Washburn University – Kansas Western Governors University – Utah Western Kentucky University Wilmington College – Ohio ### The Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation () advances excellence in educator preparation through evidence-based accreditation that assures quality and supports continuous improvement to strengthen P-12 student learning.