zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Questions to Explore Winthrop argues against both social equality and individual self-reliance in this speech. What are his reasons, and what do you think of them? Can you think of any specific disadvantages of the considerable equality and individual freedom that we enjoy today as Americans? What does Christian charity look like in practice according to Winthrop? Is it necessary to forget one’s own good in being charitable? Why or why not? What are the most important differences between Winthrop’s understanding of the glue that properly holds a community together and that of the American Founders? Which account do you find more persuasive, and why? Are Winthrop’s vision and the vision of the Founders compatible? Is there a way we might have the best of both worlds, or is there a necessary tension between them? Do you think there are elements of this vision still guiding American society? If so, which? If not, why not? How does Winthrop’s view of what is exceptional about America differ from that of more recent speakers who have appealed to his image of a city on a hill—for example, President Ronald Reagan in his First Inaugural Address?
allocated embedded cost basis, providing detailed public reports of such use. (3) Ensure that the electrical corporation’s independent marketing division does not have access to competitively sensitive information. (4) (A) Incorporate rules that the commission finds to be necessary or convenient in order to facilitate the development of community choice aggregation programs, to foster fair competition, and to protect against cross-subsidization paid by ratepayers. (B) It is the intent of the Legislature that the rules include, in whole or in part, the rules approved by the commission in Decision 97-12-088 and Decision 08-06-016. (C) This paragraph does not limit the authority of the commission to adopt rules that it determines are necessary or convenient in addition to those adopted in Decision 97-12-088 and Decision 08-06-016 or to modify any rule adopted in those decisions. To comply with P.U. Code Section 707, the CPUC opened Rulemaking 12-02-029. The result was Decision (D.)12-12-036. Attachment 1 of that Decision is known as the Code of Conduct and Expedited Complaint Procedure. These rules constitute a Code of Conduct, rules, and enforcement mechanisms applicable to electrical corporations relative to the consideration, formation and implementation of Community Choice Aggregators (CCAs). The Code of Conduct states, in Rule 2, that “[n]o electrical corporation market or lobby against a community choice aggregation program, except through an independent marketing division that is funded exclusively by the electrical corporation's shareholders and that is functionally and physically separate from the electrical corporation's ratepayerfunded divisions [emphasis added].”
NRDC recommended the successor to the current NEM tariff should remain intact as a tariff net energy metering with only slight modifications to evolve the tariff to adhere to the three tenets adopted in AB 327 (Perea) – Public Utilities Code Section 2827.1. In addition, NRDC conducted the required minimum of six modeling runs in the Public Tool and provided the input assumptions, market drivers and results as requested. D.16-01-044, pp. 113-115, “Conclusions of Law … 1. In order to ensure that customer-sited renewable DG continues to grow sustainably, the successor to the current NEM tariff should be a tariff using net energy metering, with modifications.” “Proposal of the NRDC in Determining a Successor NEM Tariff,” submitted August 3, 2015. “Response of the NRDC to Party Proposals,” submitted September 1, 2015. of the NRDC to Responses to Party Proposals,” submitted September 15, 2015. “Opening Testimony of the NRDC,” submitted September 21, 2015 and entered into the record in evidentiary hearings as exhibit no. 31 on October 6, 2015. “Opening Brief of the NRDC,” submitted October 19, 2015. “Response of the NRDC to the Proposed Decision,” submitted January 7, 2016. Verified, but reductions NRDC proposed full retail rate NEM with a continuously variable demand charge. D.1601044 at 26. However, the Commission found NRDC’s proposal for a NEM successor tariff to lack sufficient specificity to be considered; for example, NRDC did not present a quantitative example of how the demand charge would be calculated. D.1601044, Finding of Fact 24, and at 78. The Commission also found NRDC’s proposal to be unfeasibly complex in comparison to past proposals. D.16-01-044 at 79.
AECA’s participation resulted in parties agreeing to additional analyses to examine an Agricultural Class Balancing Account. (See 1.b above, raised by AECA testimony.) D.16-03-030, pp.36-38, and Agricultural and Pumping Rate Group Rate Design Settlement Agreement pp. A-16 – A-17. D.16-03-030, p.38, and Agricultural and Pumping Rate Group Rate Design Settlement Agreement p.A-18. Duplication of Effort (§ 1801.3(f) and § 1802.5): Intervenor’s Assertion CPUC Discussion a. Was the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA) a party to the proceeding? Yes Yes b. Were other parties to the proceeding with positions similar to yours? Yes Yes c. If so, provide name of parties: California Farm Bureau Federation (CFBF) Yes d. Intervenor’s claim of non-duplication: AECA and CFBF have historically submitted separate testimony in CPUC proceedings, raising distinct, issues, including recommended rate changes. During settlement negotiations the two agricultural groups coordinated our efforts. While both parties seek reasonable rates for agricultural customers, AECA has also specifically advocated for rate stability and demand management incentives, and effectively identified flaws in SCE’s development of marginal costs to calculate rates for the agricultural class. AECA has consistently documented allocation inconsistencies and volatility in SCE’s application of EPMC principals to the agricultural class. Here, AECA’s efforts resulted in rate decreases, rather than the increases proposed by SCE. In this proceeding, AECA also pursued the creation of demand-side management incentives, such as appropriate energy rate differentials, discussion hydrologic balancing accounts, including fluid milk production in the definition of agricultural power service and continuation of the PA-ICE program. AECA’s efforts to avoid duplication with other parties and dedicated pursuit of important issues should be recognized by the Commission. Yes
SCHOOL OF AEROSPACE, MECHANICAL AND MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING SIR LAWRENCE WACKETT AEROSPACE RESEARCH CENTRE SUMMER INTERN SCHOLARSHIP OPPORTUNITIES FOR 2013 EXPECTED DURATION: 25TH NOVEMBER 2013 – 28TH FEBRUARY 2014 MONETARY AMOUNT FOR ALL SCHOLARSHIPS IS $5000 SCHOLARSHIP NUMBER TITLE OF PROJECT SUPERVISOR OR SPONSOR DETAILS REQUIREMENTS/ COMMENTS 1. Multi-functional and structural nanocomposites by design Dr George Yiapanis Phone: 9925 3210 RMIT website 2. Lighter-than-air stationary observation UAV platform Assoc Prof Cees Bil Phone: 9925 6176 Apply RMIT website 3. Aircraft flight path optimisation using prevailing wind models Assoc Prof Cees Bil Phone: 9925 6176 Apply RMIT website 4. Assessment of inhalation exposure of ozone initiated chemistry in airline cabins Prof. Jiyuan Tu Phone: 9925 6191 Apply RMIT website 5. Selective melting for titanium bonding with improved surface preparation Dr Adrian Orifici Phone: 9925 6092 Apply RMIT website 6. Characterisation of mechanical and electrical degradation in flexible solar cells Dr Adrian Orifici Phone: 9925 6092 Apply RMIT website 7. Analysis of the effectiveness of Dr Clothier Apply RMIT website
Se tenir au courant des questions et politiques d’investissement afin de pouvoir communiquer celles-ci efficacement aux donateurs, partenaires et bailleurs de fonds potentiels ainsi qu’à d’autres publics, selon les besoins. Administration Assurer la mise en œuvre du plan stratégique pluriannuel, d’un plan annuel d’opérationnalisation et d’un plan tactique, y compris le budget de fonctionnement annuel. Veiller à ce que le fonctionnement de la Société soit conforme aux règles de l’Agence du revenu du Canada (ARC) et autres réglementations provinciales ou fédérales applicables. Faire en sorte que les organigpourrammes et descriptions de poste sont tenus à jour. Attribuer les tâches, établir des attentes annuelles et s’assurer qu’une évaluation annuelle du rendement soit effectuée pour chaque membre du personnel. Assumer la responsabilité générale du fonctionnement de la Société dans tous ses aspects. POUR PLUS D’INFORMATION La Société de recherche sur le cancer a retenu les services de KCI (Ketchum Canada Inc.) pour recruter un nouveau président et chef de la direction. Pour plus d’information sur cette occasion exceptionnelle, veuillez communiquer par courriel avec Sylvie Battisti, consultante principale en recherche de cadres, à . Les candidats intéressés sont invités à faire parvenir leur curriculum vitae et une lettre d’intérêt à l’adresse courriel ci-haut mentionnée avant le 2 mai 2016. Toutes les demandes de renseignement et candidatures seront traitées dans la plus stricte confidentialité. Pour plus d’information sur la Société de recherche sur le cancer, visitez le .
Mobility Agreement Staff Mobility For Teaching Planned period of the teaching activity: from [day/month/year] till [day/month/year] Duration (days) – excluding travel days: …………………. The teaching staff member Last name (s) First name (s) Seniority Nationality Sex [M/F] Academic year 20../20.. E-mail The Sending Institution/Enterprise Name Erasmus code (if applicable) Faculty/Department Address Country/ Country code Contact person name and position Contact person e-mail / phone Type of enterprise: NACE code (if applicable) Size of enterprise (if applicable) <250 employees >250 employees The Receiving Institution Name Faculty/Department Erasmus code (if applicable) Address Country/ Country code Contact person name and position Contact person e-mail / For guidelines, please look at the end notes on page 3.
Dear Applicant Thank you for the interest you have shown in working for Abraham Moss Community School. Please note that employment with the school depends on a Disclosure and Barring Service Clearance being sought, your entitlement to work in the UK and on receipt of satisfactory references. Fill in the application form in black ink or type, as we may need to photocopy it. We only contact people who are invited for interview. So, if you haven’t heard from us within 4 weeks either by e-mail or letter after the closing date for applications, please accept that you have not been short listed and will not be asked for interview. Manchester Council operates an interview guarantee scheme for disabled applicants. This means that we guarantee that all disabled people who meet the essential criteria for a post will be guaranteed an interview. Job appointment will be on merit. Yours sincerely Miss Gillian Houghton – Headteacher Post Details Post applied for: Higher Level Teaching Assistant – Level 3 Department: Art & Design Closing Date: First Post on Tuesday 11 July 2017 (9.00 a.m.) Interviews: TBC Please return your completed application form to: or by post FAO Ms Noeline Taker Assistant to Associate Headteacher Abraham Moss Community School Crescent Road Crumpsall Manchester M8 5UF Application for employment Please complete the form and provide your written evidence as to how you meet the requirements of the job either on the questionnaire if one has been provided or on separate sheets of
ALJ/AA6/ek4 PROPOSED DECISION Agenda ID #14931 (Rev. 1) Ratesetting 6/23/2016, Item #15 Decision PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AYOADE (Mailed 5/20/2016) BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Top Notch Networking, LLC for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity as a Telephone Corporation pursuant to the Provisions of Pub. Util. Code Section 1001. Application 15-11-013 (Filed November 12, 2015) DECISION DISMISSING APPLICATION WITHOUT PREJUDICE Summary This application filed by Top Notch Networking, LLC (Top Notch) for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity in order to provide resold local exchange telecommunications services and resold interexchange service throughout California is dismissed without prejudice because Top Notch failed to provide the California Public Utilities Commission with the information the Commission requested. Background On November 12, 2015, Top Networking, LLC (Top Notch), a California limited liability company authorized to do business in California, filed Application 15-11-013 (hereinafter “application”) with the Commission for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (CPCN) to provide resold local exchange telecommunications services, and resold interexchange service in California pursuant to Public Utilities Code § 1001.
On March 17, 2016, the ALJ issued another ruling directing Top Notch to provide the information requested in the February 19, 2016 ruling, and informing Top Notch that its application may be dismissed should Top Notch fail to provide the requested information by March 24, 2016. To date, Top Notch has not responded to either the February 19, 2016 ruling or the March 17, 2016 ruling and has failed to submit the information requested. Conclusions of Law Top Notch has failed to provide the information required by the Commission in this proceeding, and its application is incomplete. Top Notch does not have authority to operate as a resold local exchange telecommunications services or resold interexchange service carrier in California. The Application should be dismissed without prejudice. If Top Notch files a new application for a CPCN to operate as a resold local exchange telecommunications services or resold interexchange service carrier in California, it should be required to disclose this application The record in this proceeding should be closed. IT IS ORDERED that: Application 15-11-013 is dismissed without prejudice. Top Notch Networking, LLC shall not provide resold local exchange telecommunications services and/or resold interexchange service in California.
APPLICATION FORM COVERING SECTION (to be completed by a representative of the higher education institution) Please return the application to the national Erasmus+ office to the address: Finnish National Agency for Education / ERASMUS+ for higher education P.O. Box 380, 00531 Helsinki HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION REPRESENTATIVE Higher education institution Last name First name Position Date Signature [on behalf of the higher education institution] I affirm that the information I have in my application is correct. Information on the Erasmus+ mobility period (to be completed by the higher education institution representative) Type of exchange: Student exchange Trainee exchange Teacher exchange Staff exchange Destination country Host institution / organisation Erasmus code of the host institution Dates of the exchange Exchange duration (months/days) Erasmus + grant given for the exchange Other support granted by the home institution for the exchange
15 10 Month Employees return 25-26 New Staff In-service 29-31 9 month Return 29-31Staff In-service 31 Student Registration 8 1-3:30 Honoring POW WOW 3:30-8:00 POW WOW cont. 5:00 Supper 16 PTC 3-7 17 No School 20 Presidents’ Day 22 12:30 Dismiss-1-3:30 4-6 pm Parent Night 1 –First Day of School 2-No School 5 Labor Day-No School 6-16 NWEA Testing 28-12:30 Dismiss-1-3:30 4-6 pm Parent Night 8 12:30 Dismiss- In-Service 29 1:00 pm Honoring Pow Wow 4-6 pm Parent Night 6 3-7pm Parent Teacher Conf. 2:30 Dismiss 7 No School 10 Native American Day-No School 26-12:30 Dismiss 1-3:30 In-Service 4-6 pm Parent Night 31 Halloween 3-7 Smarter Balance 14 Good Friday-No School 17 Easter Monday-No School 24-28NWEA TESTING 26-12:30 Dismiss 1:00-3:30 In-service 4:00-6:00 pm Parent 9 12:30 Dismiss- In-Service 23 12:30 dismissal 24 -25 Thanksgiving Day 30-12:30 Dismiss-1-3:30 4-6 pm Parent Night 12 Pow Wow 1-5 NWEA Testing 20 Graduation (8th & 12th-End on 20th ) 26 Last Day of School 29 Memorial Day 5-14 NWEA Testing 14 12:30 Dismissal 25 Christmas Day Nov.4th- End of 1st Quarter=43 Jan. 20th- End of 2nd Quarter=40 March 24th- End of 3rd =43 May 26th- End of 4th=44 Total Days= 170
The COMIT RFP is amended in accordance with the following: RFP Section(s) Changed From: To: TO 2, UWI #800003, Deliverables “The Contractor shall assume 6000 video edits and transfers performed annually. For planning purposes an edit shall require between 8 to 120 hours to complete, and transfers shall require between 4 to 20 hours to complete.” “The Contractor shall assume 3000 video edits and transfers performed annually. For planning purposes this process requires on average 1-3 hours to complete and transfer.” TO 3, Introduction, Work Sizing Information, 5. Video Productions: 175 video productions annually; 80 small (30 hours to produce), 80 medium (160 hours to produce), 15 large (480 hours to produce) – quantities represent size and complexity. Video Productions: 175 video productions annually; 95 small (30 hours to produce), 70 medium (160 hours to produce), 10 large (480 hours to produce) – quantities represent size and complexity. RFP Change Log
6.2 The competent determined in accordance with the applicable national law shall have sole jurisdiction to hear any dispute between the institution and the participant concerning the interpretation, application or validity of this Agreement, if such dispute cannot be settled amicably. SIGNATURES For the participant For the institution [name(s) / forename(s)] [name(s)/ forename(s) / function] [signature] [signature] Done at [place], [date] Done at [place], [date] Annex I Work programme
Complete labeled diagrams outlining the features of these, e.g. crater, vent, focus, epi-centre Write short descriptions of a volcano, earthquake and tsunami. tsunamis (search Google Images) Volcano, earthquake and tsunami descriptions. AC1.2 Recognise areas of the world affected by tectonic events. Complete world maps (with appropriate titles and keys) showing the distribution of volcanoes and earthquakes Complete world map overlay showing plate boundaries Compare the world maps to the overlay. Identify similarities. Use an atlas to identify areas of the world affected by tectonic events. Pacific Ring of Fire, on world map. Make a list of well known volcanic eruptions, earthquakes and tsunamis. Atlas / Large world map / Globe The New Wider World (Foundation), p.202-203 Key Geography Interactions, p.32-36 Geog.1, p.104-105 (Japan 2011) (, 2011) News web sites like or CNN or newspapers like Telegraph, Guardian, Times, Independent etc (check out 7-11 Web Links: tectonics, volcanoes and earthquakes) tsunami, 2011) World maps Labels/annotation on maps Map overlay examples of a volcanic eruption, earthquake and tsunami LO2 Know how tectonic events affect people and the environment AC2.1 Identify effects of tectonic events on people. Examine how the chosen tectonic event (volcanic eruption, earthquake or tsunami) has impacted on Key Geography: New Interactions, p.38-43 Geog.1, p.109-111 & 115-117 Card sort List of effects Rank order
people. Work in groups. Give students a collection of cards outlining the effects of a major tectonic event. These should relate to people and the environment (both natural and built). Ask students to sort cards into 3 groups. Make a list of effects on people. Discuss each effect. Rank them in order of seriousness of impact on people. Using the Internet (e.g. Google to find eye witness accounts, photos etc), investigate one chosen event in closer detail, e.g. 2004 tsunami, 2005 earthquake or 1991 volcanic eruption. Write an account of the effects it had on people. The New Wider World (Foundation edition), p. 208-211 Internet search engine News web sites like or CNN or newspapers like Telegraph, Guardian, Times, Independent etc Written account of one case study AC2.2 Identify effects of tectonic events on the environment. Examine how the chosen tectonic event (volcanic eruption, earthquake or tsunami) has impacted on the environment (use case study from AC2.1). Define what is meant by ‘environment’. Draw out Geography Matters:3 (Foundation edition), p.98, 99 Investigating Geography C: (Foundation edition), p. 52-55 The New Wider World (Foundation edition), p. 208-211 Internet search engine, e.g. Google Images Oral definitions of ‘natural environment’ and ‘built environment’ Large poster Wall display
Total NEM Applications in Queue Projects that have submitted a complete application (including final building inspection) but have not yet received Authorization to Operate from utility Projects that have submitted a complete application (including final building inspection) but have not yet received Authorization to Operate from utility AND Projects where an application has been submitted but the final building inspection or other final documentation has not yet been provided. Projects that have submitted a complete application (including final building inspection) but have not yet received Authorization to Operate from utility AND Projects where an application has been submitted but the final building inspection or other final documentation has not yet been provided. Cumulative NEM Installations Projects that have received Authorization to Operate Projects that have received Authorization to Operate Projects that have received Authorization to Operate Total NEM Requests Pending Projects where an application has been submitted but the final building inspection or other final documentation has not yet been provided. N/A N/A Table 2: Categories Reported on SDG&E’s Website (updated twice daily) Category Description NEM Installations that have received Authorization to Operate from SDG&E Projects that have received Authorization to Operate NEM applications in the queue that SDG&E has received Final Electrical Inspection release from city/county and is waiting for Authorization to operate from SDG&E Projects that have submitted a complete application (including building inspection) but have not yet received Authorization to Operate from utility Total NEM Applications and MW in the Queue Projects that have submitted a complete application (including final building inspection) but have not yet received Authorization to Operate from utility
MA2 The final RFP deleted the words "The offeror's approach to working with organized labor will be evaluated for overall effectiveness and completeness" but in Sec L under MA2 the sentence "Additionally provide the offeror's experience and approach working with organized labor as required in the Labor Relations Plan (DRD-TEST2-CM-06)" is still included. Could the Government please clarify this requirement? Under MA2, the Government will evaluate the offeror’s overall Staffing and Critical Skills Approach which includes but is not limited to the Staffing and Critical Skills Plan, the Total Compensation Plan, and the Labor Relations Plan. The Government included DRD-Test2-CM-01 in the final solicitation response. Since this is part of the page count, could the Government clarify to which level it wants the contractor to address? Would the Government consider removing the CWBS from the page count? Reference section C of the DRD, which states, “The structure shall include elements listed in the PWS, with additional levels as required by the Contractor.” Page count requirements will remain the same. The transformation of an individual plans, such as the Contract Management Plan, into a deliverable such as a DRD requires certain administrative overhead, such as a Title Page, a unique introduction, and other background information. When placed in a single volume, such as Volume I of the solicitation response, we provide that context in other portions of the volume. Under the current instructions, for example, does the government expect a unique Title Plan, introduction, and background information for each plan and have that included in the proposal page count Offeror’s shall follow proposal arrangement instructions in Section L and DRD content instructions found in Attachment J-1.
_____________________ TIMOTHY J. SULLIVAN Executive Director ATTACHMENT A Illustrative Example – Nonbypassable Charges Based on Net Imports in Each Metered Interval Channel 1 Imports Channel 2 Exports kWh Basis for NBC Charge NBC Charge Time Interval (kWh) (kWh) (kWh) ($/kWh) ($) 8:00-9:00 5 – 5 0.02 0.10 9:00-10:00 4 – 4 0.02 0.08 10:00-11:00 4 1 3 0.02 0.06 11:00-12:00 4 2 2 0.02 0.04 12:00-1:00 3 3 – 0.02 – 1:00-2:00 3 4 – 0.02 – 2:00-3:00 1 4 – 0.02 – 3:00-4:00 2 – 2 0.02 0.04 4:00-5:00 3 – 3 0.02 0.06 5:00-6:00 4 – 4 0.02 0.08 :00-:0 5 – 5 0.02 0.10 :00-:0 5 – 5 0.02 0.10 :00-:0 5 – 5 0.02 0.10 38 0.76 In Time Intervals 1:00 – 2:00 and 2:00 – 3:00 of the illustrative example above, the customer was a net exporter. Therefore, the customer is only able to zero out the
Johnson Park Burney Water District Larry Lees Shasta County Administrative Officer Theresa R. Covey 21777 Shadow Lane Burney, CA 96013 Janet R. White P.O. Box 546 Burney, CA 96013 Gwen Ghiorso 21790 Second Street Burney, CA 96013 Leroy Dobins P.O. Box 560 Burney, CA 96013
should go to generation technologies. Parties also raised points related to whether certain technology types or project sizes should receive carveouts. In particular, Foundation Wind argued for a 10% carveout for renewable generation while SunVerge Energy argued that residential energy storage projects should receive a budget carveout of 30%. Numerous parties argued about what the right breakdown in the incentive budget should be. In the end, the Staff Proposal’s 75%/25% split strikes the right balance of the programs goals of reducing GHGs, providing grid support and enabling market transformation. Energy storage is the fastest growing source of projects for SGIP and represents the most scalable set of technologies to achieve the program goals. Although we do not accept the Proposal’s recommendation to keep electriconly fuel cells out of the program, we find that a significant weighting of incentives towards energy storage is justified in light of the program’s goals, and as a result we adopt the Staff Proposal’s 75%/25% incentive budget split. This Decision also finds that setting minimum incentive carveouts for renewables in the Generation technology category and energy storage systems installed at residential sites are reasonable. Further, in PG&E’s comments to the Proposed Decision, PG&E sought clarification regarding whether the carveout for smaller energy storage systems should be explicitly limited to residential applications. Given that the initial argument in favor of this carveout was made in the context of residential energy storage, it is reasonable to clarify that this carveout shall be limited to the residential customer class. That said, given historically low rates of participation among the residential class of customers in
C17 5.5 Deviation/Waivers As Required Approved deviation/waivers included with ADP C18 5.4 Request for Information As Required Full set delivered with ADP C29 4.3.2 4.3.3 Mandatory Inspection Point Notification As Required 5 days prior to each MIP/EMIP C30 4.2 Weld process procedures One Prior to start of fabrication for approval C31 4.2 Packaging, Protection and Transportation Plan One 30 days prior to delivery C32 4.2 Acceptance Test Procedure One 30 days authority to proceed Appendix C: Acceptance Data Package (ADP) Items ITEM DESCRIPTION FORMAT PARAGRAPH NUMBER A1. Approvals KDP-F-5042C 5.8 A2. Delivery/Acceptance /Shipping Document DD Form 250 5.6 A3. Historical Log/Notes/Comments Supplier Format Acceptable 5.2 5.2D 5.3 A4. Certificate of Conformance Supplier Format Acceptable 5.8.2 A5. Request for Information (RFI) Form 8-268 5.4 A6. Waiver/Deviation Records KDP-F-5042D 5.5 A7. Non-conformance and Unexplained Anomalies Supplier Format Acceptable Not Applicable A8. Shortages KDP-F-5042E Not Applicable A9. Unplanned/Deferred Work KDP-F-5042F Not Applicable A10 Preplanned/Assigned Work Supplier Format Acceptable Not Applicable A11. As-Designed / Indentured Listing / Full Size As-Built shop drawings KDP-F-5042G KDP-F-5042H 4.1 5.3.3 A12. Engineering Drawing Tree Supplier Format Acceptable 4.1 5.3.3
A13. Operating Time/Cycle KDP-F-5042J Not Applicable A14. Age Sensitive/Time-Action Items KDP-F-5042K Not Applicable A15. Nonstandard Calibration Records Supplier Format Acceptable 4.3.4 A16. Repair Limitation Data Supplier Format Acceptable Not Applicable A17. Pressure Vessel Data/Certification Plan ASME Form U-1 5.8.2 A18. Pyrotechnic Data/Certification Supplier Format Acceptable Not Applicable A19. Battery Data/MSDS Supplier Format Acceptable Not Applicable A20. Temporary Installations Supplier Format Acceptable Not Applicable A21. Acceptance Verification Matrix/Evidence of Acceptance Supplier Format Acceptable 1.0 4.3.1 4.3.2.2 4.3.4 5.1 5.3.2 5.8.1 5.8.2 5.8.3 A22. Completion & Hardware Analysis/Certification Supplier Format Acceptable 5.8.2 A23. Hardware Analysis/Certification Supplier Format Acceptable 5.8.2 A24. Packaging, Handling, Storage, Transportation (PHS&T) Requirements Supplier Format Acceptable 5.6 5.8.2 A25. Notes/Comments Supplier Format Acceptable 5.3.3 5.8.3 A26. Drawings & Specifications (CAD files on CD) Supplier Format Acceptable 4.2 5.8.2 A27. Contractor / Sub-tier Contractor Documentation Supplier Format Acceptable Not Applicable A28. Warranty (ies) OSHA 29 CFR 1910.1200 (G) See Contract Terms and Conditions
3. Date NOI filed: 02/06/13 Verified. 4. Was the NOI timely filed? Yes, Alliance for Nuclear Responsibility (A4NR), timely filed the notice of intent to claim intervenor compensation. Showing of customer or customer-related status (§ 1802(b)): 5. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding number: A.14-12-007 Verified. 6. Date of ALJ ruling: 08/04/15 Verified. 7. Based on another CPUC determination (specify): 8. Has the Intervenor demonstrated customer or customer-related status? Yes, A4NR demonstrated appropriate status. Showing of “significant financial hardship” (§ 1802(g)): 9. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding number: A.14-12-007 Verified. 10. Date of ALJ ruling: 08/04/15 Verified. 11. on another CPUC determination (specify): 12. 12. Has the Intervenor demonstrated significant financial hardship? Yes, A4NR demonstrated a rebuttable presumption of significant financial hardship. Timely request for compensation (§ 1804(c)): 13. Identify Final Decision: D.15-12-016 (corrected by Verified, D.15-12-016. 14. Date of issuance of Order or Decision: 12/31/15. December 8, 2015. 15. File date of compensation request: 02/19/16 Verified. 16. Was the request for compensation timely? A4NR did not timely file the request for compensation within
including false testimony by SCE President Ron Litzinger. ALJ’s 08/05/15 Order to Show Cause Ruling found 10 violations of Rule 8.4, p. 35, and two “possible Rule 1.1 violations,” p. 43, including Litzinger’s “incorrect statements which misled the Commission,” p. 46. D.15-12-016 determined “SCE violated Rule 1.1 as a result of the false statement made by Mr. Litzinger under oath,” COL 8. D.15-12-016 imposed financial penalties for “eight Rule 8.4 violations and two Rule 1.1 violations,” COL 11. Intervenor did not timely file the request for intervenor compensation. The Commission has not verified Intervenor’s claimed contribution. 6. A4NR’s 05/06/15 Amended Motion argued that SCE’s failure to properly disclose the Pickett/Peevey communications in Poland should be treated as a continuing violation. A4NR 05/06/15 Amended Motion, pp. 24-25. D.15-12-016 characterized “SCE’s grossly negligent acts and omissions” as “a continuing violation” (COL 7) and applied penalty against SCE for “826 days of the continuing violation arising from SCE’s acts and omissions to Mr. Pickett’s meeting with Commissioner Peevey,” COL 14. Intervenor did not timely file the request for intervenor compensation. The Commission has not verified Intervenor’s claimed contribution. Duplication of Effort (§ 1801.3(f) and § 1802.5): Intervenor’s Assertion CPUC Discussion a. Was the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA) a party to the proceeding? Yes. Intervenor did not timely file the request for intervenor compensation. The Commission has not verified Intervenor’s statements regarding duplication of effort. b. Were there other parties to the proceeding with positions similar to yours? Yes, although these parties focused upon Intervenor did not timely file the request for
Leadership by Design Summer Program Shenandoah University, Winchester, Virginia June 14-19, 2015 Overview: The Leadership by Design Summer Program is a 6 day residential program which aims to support, develop, and encourage students from many Virginia high schools. This program encourages participants to think critically about what makes for highly effective public service. Though the emphasis is having students participate in activities and discussions that lead to self-reflection and discovery of their strengths as individuals and how they function in team situations, the culmination of the week is their service at 5 non-profits on our community during the week. Description: The 6 days will expose the students to a variety of outstanding public service leaders with whom they will interact on a daily basis. Through discussion, teamwork activities, research in our library, speech preparation, and collecting community public opinion with door-to-door canvassing, these students will develop a deeper perspective from which to continue to grow in their public service and citizenship. Criteria for selection: Mature students who could benefit from a residential learning experience with focus on self-knowledge, civic engagement, advocacy, and entrepreneurial service to community. We seek diversity in all aspects of student participation. Cost: Students are asked to submit a $150 registration fee for an experience is considered a $1,000 scholarship. This covers all materials, room, board, and activities. There are optional 3 college credits with an additional fee. Description of learning environment, discussion, and activities: The discussion leaders bring a vast knowledge, credentials, and experience in teaching, learning, civic engagement, and advocacy. The first part of the week is focused on students learning more about themselves, their strengths, and how they interact in groups. Students participate in the Myers Briggs exercise, SIMSOC (a Simulated Society exercise), and music engagement with drumming and discussion based on that experience. The focus on knowledge of self is interspersed with physical activities such as campus-wide scavenger hunt in groups, bowling with discussion leaders, swimming and cook out at one of our trustees homes.
Name Tag Order Form To: Crown Trophy, 26 North University Drive, Fargo Fax 701-365-0876 | Phone 701-365-8330 | email to From: Department Name: Contact Person: Contact Phone Number: Department Billing Name: Billing Address: Shipping: Shipping Address: (If different from billing address) Quantity: Nametag Cost: $13.50 for two lines of standard engraving, magnetic clip and shipping. Guidelines: Standard set up for nametag: The standard setup is seen below and should be two lines. The goal is to have a nametag that is easily readable so abbreviate long titles. Full titles are reserved for business cards. Do not exceed 45 characters on the Title/Department line because a smaller font size will need to be used making it less readable. For multiple orders, attach a list on a separate document. For questions please contact the staff in the Office of the VP for Student Affairs: 701-231-7701. Directions: Complete the Nametag Order Information fields below. Fax or email the completed form to Crown Trophy; Fax 701-365-0876 | Phone | email to NameTag Order Information Nametag: Top Row – Name: Bottom Row, Title | Department: Do NOT to exceed 45 spaces for the title and department. Abbreviated titles should be used. NameTag Example Name Title | Department (Do NOT exceed 45 characters) Last revised March 2019
CLOSING DATE: 15 NOVEMBER 2016 COMMUNICATION AND PR SERVICES BID GEPF 44/2016 NAME OF BIDDERS 1. GGI (Pty) Ltd JV Khaliphani Communications 2. 882 Holdings 3. Ntsumi Telecommunication 4. FTI Consulting 5. Weber Shandwick 6. Epic MSL Group 7. Reputation Matters 8. HWB 9. Glass House Communication Management (pty) ltd 10. Meropa Communications 11. Creations 12. Grounded Media 13. Tshungu Multimedia Enterprise 14. The Communications Firm
00766 001 BELL, CLIFTON H. PRIDE AVE M36-L19-C 197 FALMOUTH ROAD WINDHAM ME 04062 01467 001 BELL, DAVID & DOROTHA 42 BELL ROAD M31-L07-A 42 BELL ROAD WATERFORD ME 04088 Waterford Real Estate 06/02/2014 Account List by Name Page 17 AccountCard Name / Address Location Map/Lot 00625 001 BELL, GALE & LOUANN 102 VALLEY ROAD M34-L05-A 102 VALLEY ROAD WATERFORD ME 04088 00586 001 BELL, JOHN & DONNA 83 BELL ROAD M31-L06 83 BELL ROAD WATERFORD ME 04088 01465 001 BELL, PETER & ANN 48 BELL ROAD M31-L07-B 48 BELL ROAD WATERFORD ME 001 BELL, PETER B & ANN S BLACKGUARD M31-L07 *BELL, DAVID C. & DOROTHA E 48 BELL ROAD WATERFORD ME 04088 00002 001 BELL, ROBIN & DAWN 16 PROCTOR HEIGHTS DRIVE M40-L03-1A PO BOX 122 NAPLES ME 04055 01766 001 BENNETT, GREGORY & KAREN K KEOKA CAMPGROUNDS KBC-K 205 SOPHIA TER STAINT AUGUSTINE FL 32095 6871 01747 001 BERNER, NORMAN & ANNA B3 KEOKA CAMPGROUNDS KBC-B3 10 BURTON FARM ROAD ANDOVER MA 01810 01748 001 BERNER, STEPHEN 14 KEOKA CAMPGROUNDS KBC-14 43 WHITTIER STREET ANDOVER MA 00834 001 BERNHARD, SUZANNE J. HOWE HILL ROAD M38-L05-1 325 SANTA CLARA AVE ALAMEDA CA 94501 3225
00868 001 GROVER, SHIRLEY 380 CHADBOURNE ROAD M39-L14 843 PARK STREET SOUTH PARIS ME 04281 01910 001 GROVER, SYLVIA 113 FIVE KEZARS ROAD M74-L15CT C/O KAREN GROVER 113A FIVE KEZARS ROAD WATERFORD ME 001 GROVER, WILLIAM & JOYCE 120 FISKE ROAD M77-L14 296 BISBEE TOWN ROAD WATERFORD ME 04088 01184 001 GROVER, WILLIAM D 296 BISBEETOWN ROAD M68-L14 C/0 GROVER, LYNDON & LOUISE 296 BISBEETOWN ROAD WATERFORD ME 04088 00863 001 HAASE, VIRGINIA E SAUNDERS DRIVE M39-L13-08 45 WOODFERN STREET EDISON NJ 08820 01735 001 HADLEY, GABRIELLE M Blackguard Road M30-L06B 216 BLACKGUARD ROAD WATERFORD ME Waterford Real Estate 06/02/2014 Account List by Name Page 75 AccountCard Name / Address Location Map/Lot 00549 001 HADLEY, SHARON 29 BEAR POND RD M28-L13 PO BOX 263 WATERFORD, ME 04088 01734 001 HADLEY, SHERRI L 216 BLACKGUARD ROAD M30-L06A 216 BLACKGUARD ROAD WATERFORD ME 01221 001 HAFNER, JAMES & CASIE 9 ROCK DRIVE M69-L29 PO BOX 81 WATERFORD ME 04267 01848 001 HAFNER, MILES R ROCK DRIVE M69-L29B 137 NECK ROAD LITCHFIELD ME 04350 00780 001 HAGUE, A. BART & MARY ANN CROOKED RIVER/SODOM M19-L02A PO BOX 123 WATERFORD ME 04088
Certificate Number(s) Including QAN /QAR No’s (CML Certs Only) CML xxATEXxxxx / IECEx CMLxx.xxxx Equipment Name Insert name of equipment on the certificate Name Change From: To: Address Change From: To: Label Drawing (detailing new address) Drawing Number(s) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Please Include the Drawing with Application (required) Amendments Cost Quantity Variation to one certificate Price on application xx Additional Certificate on application xx IECEx Levy (per certificate) Price on application Xx Formal Acceptance Company Name Contact P.O Number Email Phone Signature Date
By the way that hwhy with Himself regarding His own rules about a covenant He made, should tell us that he is very serious about righteous living and The Torah tells us how to go about living that way. Of course are some rules that do not apply to ANYONE anymore. Yahusha did fulfill the sacrificial laws! There is no-one else or anything else worthy to do that. Check out Revelation Chapter 5. Making to the Temple or Priestly offerings (Tithe) are also not valid. There are no more temples until Yahusha comes back after the Great tribulation. But the rest we should look at and as much as we can. They were important to our Ab Father then, and they are important to Him now. We challenge you to look at all the ones He says are forever. If anyone knows the true meaning of forever it is Him. He does not lie. We must look at them and do our best to understand them to show Him that what He says matters to us! That we trust, when He asks us to walk His path, that it is in our best interest. He is a loving Father trying to get us home safely and He has the birds eye view, seeing all the obstacles in our paths and leads us accordingly. Who were the Scriptures talking to? Anyone who to be in a covenant relationship, with all blessings that come, with loving hwhy, it’s that simple. It’s for natural born Hebrews and Adopted Covenant family members who have engaged and actively changed their citizenship to become part of Israel/Yahuda. There is no new or renewed covenant-yet. It’s family and house rules which is and always will be Torah. It is also a warning and preview to those that do not choose to want to be with Yahuah. That is how fair hwhy is! Everyone chooses one side or the other. No one sits on the fence. By not choosing to choose, the choice you made was not for hwhy and that is your choice. You fall into the other camp by default. It’s not about dos and don’ts. It’s for anyone who wants it. It’s about learning how to live in the most awesome family ever conceived. Living with the kind of Father who would conceive of a plan of freewill with consequences
NAMI Mass Media Placements July & August 2015 8/26/15 Nashoba Publishing – Community News: Treatment and recovery center begins construction; Laurie Martinelli quoted 8/14/15 iBerkshires.com – News on the Go: NAMI Mass. and NAMI Berkshire County Partner on Statewide Campaign 8/9/15 WCVB-TV – CityLine: NAMI and mental illness in communities of color; interview with Florette Willis & Dr. Brimingham; includes mentions of Sharing Hope, CEOS Against Stigma & ETE program 7/29/15 WBZ-AM Radio 1030 – NightSide with Dan Rea –CEOs Against Stigma of Mental Illness; interview with Joyce Murphy & Ken Duckworth 7/27/15 Framingham Patch: Attorney General Healey Announces Creation of Disability Rights Advisory Committee; Laurie Martinelli listed as committee member 7/23/15 Nashoba Publing – Breaking News: Lawmakers press for new patient confidentiality protections (State House News Service article); mentions NAMI Mass as one of organizations in coalition pushing The Protecting Access to Confidential Health Care Alliance bill 7/21/15 Westfield News – HealthFitness: NAMI Mass. and NAMI Berkshire County Partner on Statewide Campaign to End Mental Illness Stigma in the Workplace p. 6 also online at 7/21/15 WWLP News22: Lawmakers press for new patient confidentiality protections (State House News Service article); mentions NAMI Mass as one of organizations in coalition pushing The Protecting Access to Confidential Health Care Alliance bill 7/21/15 Lowell Sun – Breaking News – Story: Lawmakers press for new patient confidentiality protections (State House News Service article); mentions NAMI Mass as one of organizations in coalition pushing The Protecting Access to Confidential Health Care Alliance bill 7/21/15 Sentinel & Enterprise (Fitchburg) – Police – Story: Lawmakers press for new patient confidentiality protections (State House News Service article); mentions NAMI Mass as one of organizations in coalition pushing The Protecting Access to Confidential Health Care Alliance bill 7/20/15 WBUR 90.9 FM – News: Did the Boston Police Captain Who Warned FBI about His Son Have Other Choices? June Binney quoted
PENN STATE IDENTITY SERVICES PROCEDURE DOCUMENT Date: 5/15/2015 Title: Person Biographical Record data element procedure document: Name Author: Person Bio Record Working Group Procedure Statement This Procedure Document outlines the procedural requirements to create and change the Name data element in the Penn State Person Biographical Record (Person Bio Record). Background In order to simplify compliance with policies and procedures related to the management of person identity information under Penn State Administrative Policy AD80 (), Penn State Identity Services (IdS) and the Enterprise Project Management Office (EPMO) have established the Person Biographical Record (Person Bio Record). The Person Bio Record is the shared set of data elements containing authoritative information related to Person Identity, stored in data fields whose definitions are collectively understood and adhered to, created and maintained under shared policies and procedures, resulting in a high degree of consistency, confidence in fidelity of values, and data integrity, for identity information managed across Penn State information systems. The Person Bio Record Working Group established a standard format for the Person Bio Record and developed operational policy for creating, updating, and managing the Person Bio Record. The Person Bio Record Working Group also established the set of core data elements for a Person Bio Record. Principle The following language was developed by the Person Bio Record working group under the authority of IAM governance: The policies and procedures that govern the establishment or updating of person identity information stored as values within the data elements comprising the Penn State Person Bio Record shall be standardized and uniform across Penn State systems, regardless of the person’s affiliations to the university or which Identity Authority is performing the transaction. A university entity, in accordance with the rules of IdS access policy, may pull information stored as data values from the Person Bio Record for use in a local system; however, only an Identity Authority may write data values to the Person Bio Record. Any Identity Authority serving as the source for data values written to the Person Bio Record shall do so in conformance to the standards of format, policies, and procedures governing the establishment and updating of person identity information in the Person Bio Record.
Act 19 of 1987 National Intelligence Act, 1987 The repeal of the whole. Proclamation AG. 25 of 1989 Second Law Amendment (Abolition of Discriminatory or Restrictive Laws for purposes of Free and Fair Election) Proclamation, 1989 The amendment of the Annexure by the deletion of the entry relating to the National Intelligence Act, 1987. Act 13 of 1995 Public Service Act, 1995 The amendment of Schedule 3 by the substitution in the first and second column for the expressions “Namibia Security Intelligence Agency” and “Director: Namibia Security Intelligence Agency” of the expressions “Namibia Central Intelligence Service” and “Director: Namibia Central Intelligence Service”, respectively. Act 16 of 1996 Tender Board of Namibia Act, 1996 The amendment of section 21 by the substitution in subparagraph (ii) of paragraph (a) for the expression “Namibia Security Intelligence Agency” of the expression “Namibia Central Intelligence Service”.
[7] The appeal was upheld. [8] On 21 June 2013 this court made the following order in the appeal under Case: LCA 38/2012: “1. The appeal is upheld. 2. The arbitration award made by Ms Tuulike Mwafufya-Shikongo, on 9 July 2012, is hereby set aside. 3. The conduct of Ms Tuulike Mwafufya-Shikongo in this matter is referred to the Honourable Minister of Labour and Social Services and the Labour Commissioner for investigation and further action, if necessary.” [9] The first respondent did not appeal that judgment which therefore became a final judgment in such circumstances. [10] At the time of noting the aforesaid appeal the applicant had also, simultaneously, brought an application to review that same award. This review had in the meantime been set down for hearing on 31 July 2013. [11] The applicant in the review - obviously now encouraged by the outcome of the appeal - amended its Notice of Motion on 8 July 2013, indicating thereby that it now seek an adverse costs order against the second respondent. [12] Subsequent to the delivery of the amended notice of motion the below mentioned exchange of letters occurred between the involved legal practitioners. [13] On 8 July 2013 the applicant’s legal practitioners, GF Köpplinger Legal Practitioners, addressed a letter to the second respondent as follows: “We refer to the above matter and confirm that we act herein on instructions of the Namibia Estate Agents Board (‘our client’). As you are aware, a review application as well as an appeal was lodged by our client against the award made by you on 9 July 2012, in the arbitration hearing between the abovementioned parties under case number CRWK974-11.