Evidence of eligibility The evidence indicates that the building meets none of the requirements for eligibility to prepare a Model B application. The evidence indicates that the building all the requirements for eligibility to prepare a Model B application. II. Procedural Evidence Evidence (Unsatisfactory) (Pending Approval) (Approved) Consultation with affected constituencies at both the district and school level (see page 12) Involved informal and infrequent contact with selected representatives from one or two key constituencies. Requisite signatures and reporting forms from SDM/SLT team were not submitted. Involved periodic contact with one or two key constituencies in accordance with a contractually prescribed procedure. Involved ongoing and continuous contact with key constituencies including the Shared Decision Making/ School Leadership Teams constituted under Section 100.11 of Commissioner’s Regulations to work toward mutually shared goals and objectives. Requisite signatures and reporting forms from SDM/SLT team were submitted. Agreement among key constituent groups (see pages 13-15) A key constituent group or groups at both the district and school levels have major reservations and unresolved concerns about the Model B application and its potential for success and do not support it as written. A key constituent group or groups at either the district or school levels has/ have concerns or objections which raise questions about the potential success of the Model B application and which have not been adequately addressed by school officials. All Key constituent groups at both the district and school levels approved the submission of the Model B application and/or arrived at consensus to support its implementation. Self study involved key constituencies (see page 16) Involved only a few selected members of the school’s administrative and instructional staff. Involved a limited number of the school’s administrative and instructional personnel and few parent representatives. Representative’s from all constituencies at both the district and school levels included from various levels and areas of special needs, e.g. ELL, Special Ed.
(see page 20) Department’s Essential Elements, and the State’s Learning Standards that can be used to evaluate the success of the school improvement plan and the approved Model B application. with the Regents Policy, the Department’s Essential Elements, and the State’s Learning Standards. The indicators cannot be used to evaluate fully the success of the school improvement plan and the approved Model B application. the school improvement plan and the approved Model B application including evidence related to student achievement in tested and areas and to the integrity with which the application is being implemented. Professional development (see page 21) The application does not reference professional development or the professional development is not in compliance with Section 100.2 of Commissioner’s Regulations (show links) The application includes a series of staff development activities that focus on literacy and numeracy but are not closely and clearly tied to the priorities of the School Improvement Plan and require further clarification.. The application includes an organized, comprehensive staff development plan that is focused on literacy and numeracy, and clearly aligned with the school improvement plan District office support (see page 22) The application does not indicate any commitment from the District Office to support the development of the applications and implementation of Model B schools. The District Office commits to give Model B schools additional, but modest support above and beyond that provided to other schools in the district.(needs further clarification) The District Office commits to giving Model B schools significant additional support (resources, personnel, special attention) above and beyond that provided other schools in the district. IV. Assurances Assurances District submission (see page 23) There is a signed assurance or clear, unequivocal evidence that the Model B application came from the district, with the full understanding of the President of the Board of Education and the Superintendent of Schools (or in the case of , the Chancellor, the appropriate Regional Superintendents and principals). YES NO □ □