[Insert a number between 0 – 99] [Insert a number between 0 – 99] [Auto-calculated] Note: This information is associated with State Accountability Measures 6Sa. D.2a. In the space below, please identify the challenges and factors contributing to the difference between the target and actual results provided in the top row of Table D.2 (above). [Narrative, 2500 characters] D.2b. Percentage Meeting Organizational Standards by Category. In the below, provide the number of eligible entities that met each category of the Organizational Standards. The percentage that met all standards in each category will be automatically calculated and totaled in the bottom row. Percentage Meeting Organizational Standards by Category Category Number of Entities Assessed Number that Met All Standards in Category Actual Percentage Consumer Input and Involvement [Insert a number between 0 – 99] [Insert a number between 0 – 99] [Auto-calculated] Community Engagement [Insert a number between 0 – 99] [Insert a number between 0 – 99] [Auto-calculated] Community Assessment [Insert a number between 0 – 99] [Insert a number between 0 – 99] [Auto-calculated] Organizational Leadership [Insert a number between 0 – 99] [Insert a number between 0 – 99] [Auto-calculated] Board Governance [Insert a number between 0 – 99] [Insert a number between 0 – 99] [Auto-calculated] Strategic Planning [Insert a number between 0 – 99] [Insert a number between 0 – 99] [Auto-calculated] Human Resource Management [Insert a number between 0 – 99] [Insert a number between 0 – 99] [Auto-calculated] Financial Operations & Oversight [Insert a number between 0 – 99] [Insert a number between 0 – 99] [Auto-calculated] Data and Analysis [Insert a number between 0 – 99] [Insert a number between 0 – 99] [Auto-calculated] D.3. Technical Assistance Plans and Quality Improvement Plans: In the table below, please provide the number of CSBG Eligible Entities with unmet organizational standards with Technical Assistance Plans (TAPs) or Quality Improvement Plans (QIPs) in place.
Training/technical assistance to CSBG Eligible Entities Information in these cells will be auto-populated from the accepted CSBG State plan and cannot be updated or changed. actual $ for each item listed for this Federal Fiscal Year. Narrative 2500 characters – Briefly describe the actual services and activities funded for each category. Coordination of State-operated programs and/or local programs Narrative 2500 characters Statewide coordination and communication among CSBG Eligible Entities Narrative 2500 characters Analysis of distribution of CSBG funds to determine if targeting greatest need [Narrative, 2500 characters] Asset-building programs [Narrative, 2500 characters] Innovative programs/ activities by CSBG Eligible Entities or other neighborhood groups Narrative, 2500 characters] State charity tax credits [Narrative, 2500 characters] Other activities, specify_________ [Narrative, 2500 characters] Totals Auto-calculated Auto-calculated E.8. What types of organizations, if any, did the State work with (by grant or contract using remainder/discretionary funds) to carry out some or all of the activities in table E.7 (above). [Check all that apply and provide a narrative where applicable] CSBG Eligible Entities (if checked, include the expected number of CSBG Eligible Entities to receive funds) [Narrative, 2500 characters] Other community-based organizations Community Action association Regional CSBG technical assistance provider(s) National technical assistance provider(s)
F.1. Describe how the State delivered CSBG-funded training and technical assistance to CSBG Eligible Entities by completing the table below. Add a row for each activity: indicate the timeframe; whether it was training, technical assistance or both; and the topic. CSBG funding used for this activity is referenced under item E.7 (Planned vs. Actual Use of Remainder/Discretionary Funds.) Note: F.1 is associated with State Accountability Measure 3Sc. [This table will be auto-populated with information provided in the State’s accepted CSBG State plan and should be reviewed and updated based on the actual activities implemented.] Training and Technical Assistance Training, Technical Assistance, or Both Actual Dates Brief Description Auto-populated from Table 8.1 of the CSBG State Plan Training Technical Assistance Both Auto-populated from 8.1 of the CSBG State Plan Fiscal Boards Organizational Standards – General Organizational Standards – for CSBG Eligible Entities with unmet standards on Technical Assistance Plans (TAPs) or Quality Improvement Plans (QIPs) Correcting Significant Deficiencies Among CSBG Eligible Entities Reporting ROMA Community Assessment Strategic Planning Monitoring Communication Technology Other [Enter Date or Range] [Narrative, 2500 characters] Provide additional brief explanation of the technical assistance activities implemented. If “Other" was selected in column 3, describe in this column. ADD a ROW function Note: Rows may be for each additional training F.2. Indicate the of organizations through which the State provided training and/or technical assistance as described in item F.1, and briefly describe their involvement? (Check all that apply.) [Check all that applies and narrative where applicable]