zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
TEAM ROSTER TEAM NAME: Holy Cross Hurricanes Peterborough COACH(ES) NAME(S): Bond Bjorgan, John Anstess SEASON RECORD: WIN-LOSS: 20-2 Name Position No. Height Grade Matt Adamo Mike Adamo Gareth Anstess Joe Bencze Nick Blundell Ryan Condon Andrew De La Rosa David Logel Erik Oliver Max Rogers Zac Rogers Tristan Stevens G F G F G G G F F G G F 25 40 11 24 31 20 21 30 23 13 12 22 6’ 6’ 8” 6’1” 6’4” 5’10” 6’3” 5’8” 6’4” 6’3” 6” 6’1” 5’11” 11 12x 9 12 11 12x 11 11 12x 11 11 11
MG JG SG MB JB SB High Jump Thursday 3:30 pm Friday 9:30 am Saturday 2:30 pm Saturday 9:00 am Saturday 12:00 pm Friday 1:30 pm Pole Friday 4:30 pm Saturday 9:30 am Friday 1:00 pm Thursday 3:30 pm Friday 9:15 am Saturday 1:30 pm Long Jump Friday 9:30 am Friday 4:30 pm Thursday 5:30 pm Saturday 2:30 pm Thursday 3:00 pm Saturday 9:00 am Triple Jump Saturday 12:00 pm Thursday 3:00 pm Saturday 9:00 am Friday 1:30 pm Friday 4:30 pm Thursday 5:30 pm Shot Put Saturday 9:00 am Thursday 5:30 pm Friday 9:30 am Friday 4:30 pm Friday 1:30 pm Saturday 12:00 pm Discus Friday 1:30 pm Saturday 2:30 pm Thursday 3:00 pm Saturday 12:00 pm Thursday 5:30 pm Friday 9:30 am Javelin Saturday 2:30 pm Friday 1:30 pm Saturday 12:00 pm Friday 9:30 am Saturday 9:00 am Thursday 3:00 pm Events (by time) Girls Boys MG JG SG MB JB SB Thursday 3:00 / 3:30 pm High Jump Triple Jump Discus Pole Vault Long Jump Javelin Thursday 5:30 pm Shot Put Long Jump Discus Triple Jump Friday 9:15 / 9:30 am Long Jump High Jump Shot Put Javelin Pole Vault Discus Friday 1:00 / 1:30 pm Discus Javelin Pole Triple Jump Shot Put High Jump Friday 4:30 pm Pole Vault Long Jump Shot Put Triple Jump Saturday 9:00 / 9:30 am Shot Put Pole Triple Jump High Jump Javelin Long Jump Saturday 12:00 pm Triple Jump Javelin Discus High Jump Shot Put Saturday 1:30 / 2:30 pm Javelin Discus High Jump Long Jump Pole Vault
Day 1 of the inspection 8.00am Initial Meeting with GILL /SLT Confirm programme Confirm housekeeping arrangements Confirm meetings with: Govs; parents Agree SLT shadow Agree lesson observations Agree interim feedback Agree reporting back process when written draft will be received Agree when it needs to be returned Agree how to negotiate amendments When will school receive final draft? When will report be published? no-go areas Agree meetings with LMT Gill In-depth meeting with GILL /SLT – first morning Keep notes of key points, especially judgements key points at end of meeting Challenge any you do not think is accurate and back up challenge with evidence Agree time of feedback at end of day Gill /SLT Meeting with Governors Chair is in charge of meeting 3-6 govs plus Gill Keep of key points, especially judgements Check key points at end of meeting Challenge any issue you do not think is accurate and back up challenge with evidence Gill / Governors Meeting with students School has some say over students Should be introduced to inspectors Should know about school priorities GN debrief with them afterwards Shosh / Amy Meeting with Parents Make sure they are briefed on key issues Make sure they feedback to us Rukeya / Lipi / ???? Draft report sent to school: GILL
Ofsted File 3 – Leadership and Management School Link A Management Structure HT – Gillian Kemp B LA Review Leadership and Management May 2014 HT – Gillian Kemp C Governors: HT Reports to Governors / Governing Body Minutes (Documented evidence of the work of Governors) Governance Structure and Responsibilities GB Annual Planner HT – Gillian Kemp / SBM – Nichola Ahmed D Partnerships: IOD Collaborative Ben Jonson Primary School School Barclays / Skadden HT – Gillian Kemp E Parental Engagement: Parent Workshops Consultations Surveys Reporting to Parents HT – Gillian Kemp F SMSC: PHSE (Including SRE) and RE Policies Assembly Themes Curriculum overviews – RE and PHSE Equalities SMSC – List DH – Shoshannah Thompson G SEN: SEN Report SEN Parent Book Speech and Language Booklet for Parents Provision map (Inclusion Office) AHT – Amy Craig H / I Statutory Policies SBM – Nichola Ahmed J/K Safeguarding: Training First Aid DCPP Certificates (SBM Office) Single Central Record (SBM Office) Policies: Safer recruitment, whistleblowing, Child Protection, Keeping Children Safe and positive handling SBM – Nichola Ahmed L Early Years Foundation Stage Early Years SEF (SEF Summary File A – Section E) Analysis / On-entry Data (See Ofsted Box – Data Pack A) AHT SENCO – Amy Craig / AHT FS/KS1 – Sarah Cobb M Child Protection Vulnerable Children Referrals and Intervention Provision Map (Inclusion Office) Pastoral Admin – Mark Ripper / HT – Gillian Kemp
sustained progress that leads to outstanding achievement. ◦ Gaps between the attainment of groups of children in the setting, including those for whom the setting receives additional funding, have closed or are closing rapidly. Any differences between outcomes in different areas of learning are closing. ◦ Children are highly motivated and very to join in. They consistently demonstrate the characteristics of effective learning. ◦ Where children’s starting points are below those of other children of their age, assessment shows they are improving consistently over a sustained period and the gap is closing. Any gaps between the attainment of groups, including those for whom the setting receives additional funding, are closing. ◦ Children are working comfortably within the range of development typical for their age, taking account of any whose starting points are higher or any disabled children and those with special educational needs. ◦ Children develop the key skills needed for the next steps in their learning, including, where appropriate, for starting school. educational needs and/or those for whom the setting receives additional funding, do not match the levels of progress made by most children. ◦ Gaps between different groups show little sign of closing or may be widening. ◦ Children are not well prepared for school or their next stage of learning. ◦ Not enough children are working within the range of development that is typical for their age, given their starting points. Notes Action Tasks Success criteria Monitoring / date of review Action owner
Ofsted Board Minutes of the meeting held on Tuesday 26 September 2017 Board members present: Others present: Observer: Executive support: Apologies: Julius Weinberg, Chair John Cridland CBE Linda Farrant John Hughes Amanda Spielman, HMCI Venessa Willms OBE Matthew Coffey, Chief Operating Officer Louise Grainger, Director, Finance, Planning and Commercial Sean Harford, National Director, Education Eleanor Schooling, National Director, Social Care Luke Tryl, Director, Corporate Strategy For item 2 only: James Ford, Strategic
Strategy update 77 – share copies of the report on what the strategy means for each remit at the next Board meeting. Director, Corporate Strategy Workforce strategy 82 – circulate the workforce strategy slides and invite comments from Board members. Secretary Workforce strategy 83 – the and Risk Committee to hold an agenda item on workloads at a future meeting Linda Farrant and John Hughes Workforce strategy 84 – schedule an in-depth discussion on workload at a future Board meeting. Board Secretary Strategy update 85 – schedule a discussion on the curriculum at a future Secretary
Full-time provision is that which operates for more than three hours. These are usually known as nurseries, nursery schools and pre-schools and must deliver the Early Years Foundation Stage. They are registered on the Early Years Register and pay the higher fee for registration. Sessional provision operates for more than two hours but does not exceed three hours in any one day. These are usually known as pre-schools, kindergartens or nursery schools and must deliver the Early Years Foundation Stage. They are registered on the Early Years Register and pay the lower fee for registration. Childminders care for one or more children where individual children attend for a period of more than two hours in any one day. They operate from domestic premises, which are usually the childminder’s own home. They are registered on the Early Years Register and must deliver the Early Years Foundation Stage. Out of school provision may be sessional or full-time provision and is delivered before or after school and/or in the summer holidays. They are registered on the Early Years Register and must deliver the Early Years Foundation Stage. Where children receive their Early Years Foundation Stage in school these providers do not have to deliver the learning and development requirements in full but should complement the experiences children receive in school. The Office for Standards in Education, Children's Services and Skills (Ofsted) regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
More than 4 or 5 requirements are missing More than 4 or 5 requirements are incomplete 3 or 4 requirements are missing Or 4 requirements are incomplete 1 or 2 requirements are missing 1 or 2 requirements are incomplete Student has gone beyond project requirements and communicated information in a successful way. Formatting Letter has been formatted in the same manner as a business letter, but at least 4 or more elements are incorrect. Letter has been formatted in the same manner as a business letter, but at least 3-4 elements are incorrect. Letter has been formatted in the same manner as a business letter, but at least 1-2 elements are incorrect. Letter has been formatted in the exact same format as the Business Letter template on page R29 in the textbook: Sender address is in correct format with all required information Recipient address is in correct format with all required information Date is in proper location Body has been properly formatted. Signature and closure are proper for a business letter Letter has been Letter has the font of Times New Roman, Size 12 Letter has 1 inch margins all around Structure, Grammar, and Usage Information is the bare minimum and barely meets the requirements for a business letter. There are 1-2 sentences per paragraph. There are 11+ errors in sentence structure There are 11+ spelling errors All information is presented in basic, incomplete sentences. There are 3 sentences per paragraph. 8-10 errors in sentence structure 8-10 errors in spelling All information is presented in basic, choppy sentences. There are 4-5 sentences per paragraph. 6-7 errors in sentence structure 6-7 errors in spelling. All information is presented in detailed, complete sentences. There are 6-7+ sentences per paragraph. Less than 5 errors in sentence structure Less than 5 errors in spelling.
“George,” very softly. No answer. “George!” “Whatta you want?” “I was only foolin’, George. I don’t want no ketchup. I wouldn’t eat no ketchup if it was here beside me.” “If it was here, you could have some.” “But I wouldn’t eat none, George, I’d leave it all for you. You could cover your beans with it and I wouldn’t touch none of it.” Narrative Form: Specific Purpose: Dialogue Form: Lennie spoke craftily, “Tell me—like you done before.” “Tell you what?” “About the rabbits.” George snapped, “You ain’t gonna put nothing over on me.” Lennie pleaded, “Come on, George. Tell me. Please, George. Like you done before.” “You get a kick outta that, don’t you? Awright, I’ll tell you, and then we’ll eat our supper…” Narrative Form: Specific Purpose: ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________
While some students may think that the title Of Mice and Men comes from the fact that Lennie likes to pet mice and other soft things, the title is really taken from the poem “To a Mouse” by Robert Burns. Robert Burns (1759-1796) is probably the most famous of all the Scottish poets. After accidentally turning up a mouse’s nest while he was plowing in 1785, he wrote an ode to this mouse, expressing his sympathy for the mouse and his home. For the average English speaker, Burn’s poetry can be quite archaic and complex. On the left is the original poem by Burns. On the right is a translation of the words into modern English. Wee, sleeket, cowran, tim'rous beastie, O, what in thy breastie! Thou need na start awa sae hasty, Wi' bickering brattle! I wad be laith to rin an' chase thee, Wi' murd'ring pattle! I'm sorry Man's dominion Has broken Nature's social union, An' justifies that ill opinion, Which makes thee startle, At me, thy poor, earth-born companion, An' fellow-mortal! I doubt na, whyles, but thou may thieve; What then? Poor beastie, thou maun live! A daimen-icker in a thrave 'S a sma' request: I'll get a blessin wi' the lave, An' never miss't! Small, sleek, cowardly, nervous little beast, Oh, what a is in your breast! You need not run away so hastily, With a scurry I would hate to run and chase you, With a murdering shovel! I am truly sorry that Man’s power Has broken Nature’s union between man and beast And justifies that sad opinion Which makes you startle, At me, your poor, earth-born friend, And fellow mortal! I do not doubt that sometimes you may steal; But so what? Poor beast, you must also live! A corn in a field is a small request: I will be blessed with more,
Of Mice and Men Vocabulary Activity Directions: In the space provided below the vocabulary definition, rewrite the word with an image to develop visual comprehension of the word. Then, use the word in a sentence about the novel. Use either a prepositional phrase, participial phrase, or adverb/adverb clause at the beginnings of your sentences. Ex: (Prepositional Phrase) On the bank of the river, George untied his BINDLE and took out four cans of beans. (Participial Phrase) Looking for the four cans of beans, George untied his BINDLE. (Adverb/Adverb Clause) Carefully, George untied his BINDLE to search for the four cans of beans he planned to serve for supper. 1. Bindle – (n) a bundle of clothes or bedding, usually tied together with string and carried by travelers 2. Morosely – (adv) in a sad or gloomy manner 3. Pantomime – (v or n) a story or play told without words, using only one’s body parts and facial expressions / to go through the motions 4. Contemplated – (v) thought about carefully, pondered, brooded over 5. Pugnacious – (adj) having a quarrelsome or combative nature, always looking for a battle
What are some other major works written by Steinbeck? Which two major elements did Steinbeck rely on for much of his writing? What was John Steinbeck’s relationship to the Salinas Valley? For the visual, create a collage of photos of Steinbeck and covers of his most significant novels. Sociologists-Financial: 1 additional, reliable website that you find (record URL) Sociologists’ Questions: What is the history of the New York Stock Exchange? What was the condition of the U.S. stock market during the 1920s? What was the stock market crash; when and how did it occur? How was the average American affected by the crash, and how did he/she react to it? What did President Roosevelt (AKA “FDR”) do to try to stem the tide of worried Americans rushing the banks? What was the mood of the American people, as captured by the New York Times news coverage on and after the day of the crash? For the visual component of your presentation, find images from the time of the GRADING RUBRIC NAME: _________________________________ STUDENT # ______ GROUP # _______________ 4 (+/-) 3 (+/-) 2 (+/-) 1 (+/-) INDIVIDUAL: PARAGRAPH Demonstrates a superior understanding of the topic; incorporates information from all questions and all (or nearly all) sites; few or no grammatical flaws Demonstrates a general understanding of the topic; incorporates information from most questions and most sites; some grammatical flaws Demonstrates a lack of understanding of the topic; incorporates information from few questions and few sites; several grammatical flaws Demonstrates a lack of sufficient research; missing information from several questions and most sites; many grammatical flaws 0 = missing paragraph
Table 1: Group 2 – One – Piece Drainable (a) Flat Baseplate Key Feature: Drainable Pouch Related Feature Variant Pouch Filter Protected dual carbon filter Protected single carbon filter Pouch Construction Material Transparent with fabric backing Transparent with fabric cover on both sides including viewing window Opaque with fabric backing Opaque with fabric cover on both sides Pouch Size Extra small Small Medium Large Extra large Belt Loops No belt loops Belt loops on each side of pouch Belt on each side of baseplate Pouch Closure Type Integrated closure Tap closure with plug Headspace Low headspace Standard headspace Baseplate Material Hydrocolloid Hydrocolloid with Aloe Vera Baseplate Thickness 0.8mm Baseplate Shape Round Oval Oval with contouring spaces Diamond Oblong Square Triangle Hexagon Baseplate Skin Adhesion Hydrocolloid self adhesive Hydrocolloid self adhesive with tape border Baseplate Wear Time Standard Baseplate Opening Type Pre-cut Cut-to-fit Pre-cut mouldable Release Tabs Release tabs No release tabs Economic Analysis Not undertaken. Financial Analysis Listing of this product is recommended on a cost minimisation basis compared with the notional benchmark product in Subgroup 2(a) of the SAS Schedule. It is therefore unlikely that there would be any budgetary impact for the SAS as a consequence of listing this product under the conditions requested by the applicant.
DIRECTIONS: To request an out-patient appointment for a research participant complete and submit this form to the Central Scheduling-Research team at . Submit this Form at least 48 hours prior to the date/time of the appointment request. Research appointment requests are processed M-F, 8-4:30. Requests received immediately before the date/time being requested cannot be accommodated. Appointment confirmation is routinely provided via email. If the Submitter has not received email confirmation 24 hours prior to the requested appointment, please resubmit the request. If you have questions: Contact with questions specific to scheduling research visits. Contact the Office of Grant Administration at with research related questions. You may also refer to the “Managing Patient Research Visits” Tip Sheet for guidance. NOTE: Appointments for radiology services are requested by submitting the to the CT Scheduling team. All Forms & Tip Sheets can be obtained at the . The asterisks (*) denotes required information Research Study & Contact Information Grady Plan Code* (e.g. E600. Refer to the study’s ROC Approval document) Ordering Clinician* PI Name* Requestor Name* Requestor Phone Number * Email* Appointment Request Information Appointment Date* (mm/dd/yy) Appointment Time* NOTE: It is the responsibility of the PI/designee to provide the confirmed date, time and appointment location to the patient. Patient Demographic Information NOTE: A patient MUST be “enrolled” into the referenced study in Epic prior to transmitting this form Last Name* First Name* Middle Initial Date of (mm/dd/yyyy) Gender Medical Record Number* Social Security Number Check, if a new MRN is required. *To obtain a new MRN, provide the patient’s full name, date of birth, mailing address and phone number. Patients cannot be scheduled without the information required to obtain an MRN. Language Address City State Zip Code Phone Number ** Remember to submit the Research Patient Tracker Form after each research visit.
A web link to the list of the governors/trustees, including their length of service A link to the vision statement on the school website (if applicable) The governing boards’ strategy document We do not need to see your full School Development Plan (SDP) or School Improvement Plan (SIP), but if your vision and/or strategic priorities are contained as an introduction to the SDP/SIP, we are happy to receive the relevant extract. You may also wish to send us a maximum of two additional pieces of documentary evidence. These may include relevant governing board minutes or a governance review report. Please ensure this accompanying evidence is relevant to the issue that forms the basis of the nomination. Please do not submit school brochures, Ofsted reports, school policies, data reports, or other long documentation unless it relates to this nomination and the work of the governing board. Information about you and the governing board you are nominating NGA requires the following data to correspond with you regarding the Outstanding Governance Awards: Your name Capacity in you are aware of the work of the governing board Your email address Your contact number Name of the school you are nominating Phase (eg Primary/Secondary) Type (eg Academy/Community/Foundation/Trust/Free School/Voluntary Aided/Voluntary Controlled/ MAT/ Federation) Website of the school or group of schools How did you hear about the Outstanding Governance Awards? This data will be held securely by the National Governance Association to correspond with you regarding the Outstanding Governance Awards. Your data, in respect of these awards, will be deleted by the National Governance Association on or before 30 June 2019. By signing this form, you are confirming that you are consenting to the National Governance Association holding and processing your personal data for the following purposes (please clearly highlight where you grant consent): I consent to NGA contacting me by phone regarding the Outstanding Governance Awards. YES/ NO I consent to NGA contacting me by email regarding the Outstanding Governance Awards. YES/ NO Signature
[State Agency Logo] OFFICIAL GRANT AWARD NOTIFICATION GRANTEE INFORMATION Organization Name Official with Authority Name/Title Address City/State/Zip (including 4 digits) Phone/Email GRANTEE PROJECT Program Contact Name Phone/Email Business Mgr/Accountant Name Phone/Email GRANT PROJECT TITLE (If Sgl Source identify after typing the title) FUNDING/ENCUMBRANCE INFORMATION FISCAL YEAR 2016 2017 Fund FinDeptID AppropID Account PC Bus Unit Project ID Activity ID Source Amount (should total award) $ $ EGRANT NUMBER (if applicable): SWIFT Contract Number: SWIFT Vendor Number: Purchase Order Number: Funding Source/Legislative Authority: DELETE lines below if not federal funding Federal Award Number: Federal Award Year: Federal CFDA Number: Grantee DUNS Number: UFARS Finance Code Number (for school districts and charter schools only): AWARD PERIOD Start Date: End Date: This is a (Enter duration based on GO/Single Source/Other) year grant. Continuation grant awards are/are not (select one) an option.
Special Provisions for Document Printing Agreements If this Agreement is for printing documents, Contractor use only recycled paper, unless the proposed printing job cannot be done on recycled paper. Contractor shall certify in writing under penalty of perjury, upon completion of performance of the Services under this Agreement, the minimum percentage of post-consumer and secondary materials provided or used in the Services. Special Provisions for Janitorial Services and Building Maintenance Agreements If this is a janitorial services or building maintenance agreement, Contractor shall use products only if they contain recycled paper. Upon completion of performance of the Services under this Agreement, Contractor shall certify in writing under penalty of perjury the minimum percentage of post-consumer and secondary materials provided or used in the performance of the Services. If this Agreement requires Contractor to perform Services at a new site, Contractor shall retain for 60 days all employees currently employed at that site by any previous contractor that performed the same services at the site. Contractor shall provide upon request information sufficient to identify employees providing janitorial or building maintenance services at each site and to make the necessary notifications required under Labor Code section 1060 et seq. Special Provisions for Parts-cleaning Agreements If this Agreement involves parts cleaning, Contractor shall use recycled solvents. Contractor shall certify in writing under penalty of perjury, upon completion of performance of this Agreement, the minimum percentage of post-consumer and secondary materials provided or used in the Services. Special Provisions for Mined Minerals Agreements If this Agreement involves purchasing mined minerals, Contractor shall not supply through this Agreement any sand, gravel, aggregates, or other minerals a JBE may not purchase under Public Contract Code section 10295.5. Special Provisions for Agreements Providing for Progress Payments If this Agreement provides for the making of progress payments to Contractor (e.g., in connection with the purchase and sale of any customizable the JBE shall make the progress payments in arrears not more frequently than monthly and only following successful completion of any clearly identifiable project milestones set forth in this Agreement and that Contractor has successfully achieved on the date indicated. The JBE shall withhold an amount of not less than 10 percent from each installment payment pending final completion of all work. Special Provisions for Federally-funded Agreements
12.2.1 If a specimen does not suit the purpose of the study because of donor pathology interference and the disease or condition in question was not disclosed as a contraindication on the Anatomy Bequest Program Proposal Form, Requester will be responsible for the full specimen reimbursement fee. 12.2.2 In the event that a donor with a known pathology which had previously been disclosed as contraindicated on the Anatomy Bequest Program Proposal Form is inadvertently assigned to a study, the Anatomy Bequest Program will not invoice the end user for the anatomy access or any associated transportation charges. 12.3 University may terminate this Agreement at any time upon seven (7) days written notice to Requester. 13. Entire Agreement. Except as expressly provided herein, this Agreement constitutes the entire agreement with respect to the transactions contemplated herein and supersedes and is in full substitution for any and all prior agreements and understandings between the parties hereto relating to such transactions. Each party disclaims reliance on any prior oral or written representations or undertakings by the other party in entering into this Agreement unless such representations or undertakings are expressly set forth in this Agreement. Wherever the parties agree to discuss a matter, there will be no implied agreement to agree, nor will any other standard be applied in determining a party’s performance that is not expressly set forth in this Agreement. This Agreement may be signed in multiple counterparts which, taken together, constitute a single agreement. This Agreement and any amendment to it may be signed electronically, and such electronic signature will have the same effect as an original, provided the circumstances do not indicate otherwise. 14. Governing Law. The laws of the State of shall govern the validity, construction and enforceability of this Agreement, without giving effect to its conflict of laws principles. Any dispute arising out of or related to this Agreement shall be brought in the state or federal court located in . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day and date first written above. Regents of the University of Minnesota By: Name: Date: By: Name: Date:
By: __________________________________ Name: Title: Date: ________________________________ By: __________________________________ Name: Title: Date: ________________________________ Regents of the University of Minnesota By: ____________________________________ Name: Sean M. Poppoff Title: Interim Executive Director, Lions Gift of Sight Date: __________________________________ By: ____________________________________ Name: Jakub Tolar, MD, PhD Title: Dean, Medical School Vice President for Clinical Affairs Date: __________________________________ Note: This agreement to be executed by Affiliate before University representatives begin the execution process.
By: _________________________________ Name: Title: Date: ________________________________ By: _________________________________ Name: Title: Date: ________________________________ By: _________________________________ Name: Jakub Tolar, MD, PhD Title: Dean, Medical School Vice President for Clinical Affairs Date: ________________________________ Note: Agreement is to be executed by University Training Site before University Program begins the execution process.
Title: Department Chair University of Minnesota Department of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences Title: Date: Date: Faculty Sponsor By: _________________________________ Name: Title: Date:
material(s) it wishes to develop for commercial purposes on reasonable terms and conditions, including a reasonable royalty, as the parties hereto agree in a subsequent writing. 8.1.2 Except for (a) the limitation on copyrightable works in 8.1.1, (b) University’s right to control publication of its own research results, (c) patented and University Subject Inventions, and (d) University Confidential Information, Sponsor will have the free, irrevocable, non-exclusive unlimited right to use all research results for any purpose worldwide. 8.2 Subject Inventions. 8.2.1 “Subject Invention” any invention that is first conceived or reduced to practice by one or more employees of University, alone or with others, in performance of the Project. The inventorship of a Subject Invention will be determined in accordance with Title 35 of the United States Code. 8.2.2 "University Subject Inventions" are those Subject Inventions invented solely by employees of University. “Joint Subject Inventions” are those Subject Inventions invented by employees of University jointly with employees of Sponsor. 8.2.3 No rights to University background intellectual property are granted the terms of this agreement. 8.3 Patent Applications and Costs 8.3.1 Each party shall promptly disclose to the other party in writing any Subject Invention of which that party becomes aware during the Term or afterwards. 8.3.2 Sponsor, in consultation with University, shall have the right to control the preparation, filing, and prosecution of each patent application that is specific to a Subject Invention. Sponsor shall have three (3) months from receipt of an invention disclosure from University to notify University whether it desires to file a patent application on the Subject Invention (“Subject Invention Review Period”). If Sponsor files, then Sponsor shall diligently pursue filing of the patent application in the name of University with respect to University Subject Inventions and in the name of both University and Sponsor in the case of Joint Subject Inventions, and University shall be provided a copy of the draft application and an opportunity to review and participate in its filing and further prosecution; a copy of the filed application; and copies of all correspondence to and from the Patent Office. Sponsor shall be responsible for the full expense of Subject Invention patent application and prosecution. trial
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each individual signing below hereby represents and warrants being duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of the respective party. By: ____________________________________ Name: Title: Date: __________________________________ By: ____________________________________ Name: Title: Date: __________________________________ Regents of the University of Minnesota By: ____________________________________ Name: Title: Director, Global Medical Education and Research Program Date: __________________________________ By: ____________________________________ Name: Jakub Tolar, MD, PhD Title: Dean, Medical School Vice President for Clinical Affairs Date: ___________________________________ NOTE: University of Minnesota requests that this Agreement be executed by the foreign entity before University of Minnesota begins its execution process.
Project Name: Project Location: Project Number: Section of the Act: Licensed Beds/Units: Mortgage Amount: $ Interest Rate: P & I: $ Maturity Date: R4R Monthly: $ R4R Initial Deposit: $​ Borrower: Operator: Master Tenant: Lender: A/R Lender: Inspection Fee: $ MIP: $ Non-Critical Repairs: $ Repair Escrow: $
3rd – Identify yourself by name and title 4th - Give exact location of the emergency and what resources are needed 5th – Phone Number (801)-475-7010 Operator will dispatch Ogden Clinic Emergency Medical Team in the event of a medical emergency. The operator will be responsible for calling 911 and giving directs to the location of the emergency Communication Phones- are located at the front desk in the Northwest corner and on the east wall near the pulleys. Always Call Clinic Operator first 2299 Other Important Numbers Poison Control: 1-800-222-1222 Jon Rhodes, MSPT: 801-475-7010 McKay-Dee Emergency Room: Ogden Regional Emergency Room: (801)-479-2376 4. for shock 5. Do NOT move the athlete until advanced medical help has arrived. Move only when the athlete is properly secured to the backboard and has cervical brace on to support the neck. 6. Reassure the patient that everything possible is being done. (No promises of optimal health) Cardiac Emergency 1. Check ABCs 2. Treat for shock 3. Call - 2299 - Code Blue 4. Position the patient in most comfortable position possible 5. If heart does stop a defibrillator will be available at the front desk of Swenson Gym. Swenson Gym employees will retrieve the defibrillator. Respiratory Emergency 1. Check for consciousness 2. Call - 2299 - Code Blue 3.Head tilt chin left 4. Look listen and feel 5. Give to two rescue breathings 6. Check for pulse 7. Begin rescue breathing, one breath every five seconds Broken Bones 1. Treat the athlete for shock 2. Call - 2299 - Code Blue 3. Apply basic first aid 4. Do not attempt to reduce the fracture 5. Splint, making sure the athlete continues to have a distal pulse
studies include the development of statewide groundwater DRASTIC vulnerability assessment model for Nebraska and Oklahoma . Conversely, such large-scale regional groundwater vulnerability studies are common in other countries around the world. There is currently no statewide groundwater vulnerability study for the state of Maryland. Most existing vulnerability studies focused on the pesticide pollution or groundwater quality studies in specific regions of the state . Groundwater pollution remains a major public concern in the state of Maryland. For example, Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) leakages have resulted in groundwater pollution in many parts of the state, resulting in several class action lawsuits . As of April 30, 2009, there are 8,580 underground storage tanks (UST) and 11,109 confirmed releases in the state. Another source of groundwater pollution in the state includes non-point source pollutions such as pesticide leachates due to the wide use of pesticide in many part of the state . A United States Geological Survey (USGS) report identified 27 different pesticides and pesticide byproducts in Maryland’s western and central regions groundwater system. Other potential sources of groundwater pollution include spillage at the ground surface, and waste disposal sites. One of the assumptions of the DRASTIC methodology is that contaminations occur at the ground surface. However, most of the potential groundwater pollution sources in the state of Maryland do not occur at the ground surface. This suggests that the DRASTIC map generated in this study cannot be singularly used to determine the suitability of a site for waste disposal or USTs. In these cases, other factors such as design criteria will play a major role in the decision-makings. We believe a statewide groundwater vulnerability map can serve as a screening tool to determine areas where
Coordinator, LMU Writing Center (Summer 2016 – present) Director, LMU Writing Associates Program (Spring 2016 – present) University Adviser, Academic Resource Center (December 2013 – May 2016) Coordinator, Faculty Student Engagement Programs (Fall 2014 – Spring 2016) SCHOLARSHIP Book Chapter Ogilvie, Andrew. “Writing In Communities: Promoting Procedural Knowledge through Participation.” In Barbara Bird and Doug Downs, eds. Next Steps: New Directions for/in Writing About Writing. Utah State University Press. 2017. Journal Article Ogilvie, Andrew. “New Frames for New Futures; Translator as Metaphor for the Value of a 21st Century Liberal Arts Education.” Rendezvous Journal of Arts & Letters, vol. 43, nos. 1-2, forthcoming 2017. WORK EXPERIENCE Director of Marketing (2008-2009) Martifer Solar - Santa Monica, CA Formulated and implemented marketing campaign that re-branded Martifer’s previous reputation as a residential solar provider to align with the new global position as a commercial and industrial solar provider. Crafted and communicated new brand identity across website, logos, taglines, ads, marketing, trade shows, and conferences. Developed training materials for new sales employees and conducted brand training. Marketing Coordinator (2006-2008) Partnership - Venice, CA Created global project portfolios in collaboration with senior architects in order to ensure coherence across project design and client Designed, composed, and disseminated key stakeholder materials including monthly e-newsletter that targeted over 5000 clients in US and abroad Led and composed project submissions for global design awards and oversaw submissions for individual designer awards Strategic Communications Consultant (2003-2005) Booz-Allen Hamilton - McLean, VA Coordinated day-to-day stakeholder relationship strategy for multi-million dollar Department of Defense program eCYBERMISSION
Must include: Preparation for Microsoft Office Specialist (MOS) Exam using GMetrix – 77-725 - Word 2016 Completing of the Microsoft Office Specialist (MOS) Exam – 77-725 – Word 2016 SNAP 2016 assessment activities, tests, and exams. Software can be purchased from if you purchased a used book. All SSCC bookstore bundled packages will include book and SNAP 2016 software. COURSE OUTLINE: Week 1: Level 1 – Chapter 1 - Course Learning Objective 1: Students open, save, print, close, edit, spellcheck and grammar check various documents in Microsoft Word. Methods for accessing include assigned SNAP activities and tests. Week 2: 1 – Chapter 2 - Course Learning Objective 2: Students will apply the formatting, styles, themes, and paragraph alignments in Microsoft Word. Methods for accessing include assigned SNAP activities and tests. Week 3: Level 1 – Chapter 3 - Course Learning Objective 3: Students will apply numbering in bullets, emphasis, and set and modify tabs in Microsoft Word. Methods for accessing include assigned SNAP activities and tests. Week 4: Level 1 – Chapter 4 - Course Learning Objective 4: Students will change document views, page setups, and remove page numbers, add and remove headers and footers, format page backgrounds, and find and replace text in Microsoft Word. Methods for accessing include assigned SNAP activities and tests. Week 5: Level 1 – Chapter 5 - Course Learning Objective 5: Students will format text in the columns, hyphenate words, insert and format images, and draw shapes using Microsoft Word. Methods for accessing include assigned SNAP activities and tests. Week 6: Level 1 – Chapter 6 - Course Learning Objective 6: Students will maintain documents by creating folders, inserting files, previewing and printing, creating and printing envelopes and labels, and use templates using Microsoft Word. Methods for accessing include assigned SNAP activities and tests. Week 7: Level 1 – Chapter 7 - Course Learning Objective 7: Students will create tables and smart art using Microsoft Word. Methods for accessing include assigned SNAP activities and tests.
COMPROMISE DATE RESPONSIBLE Transparency, Access to Public Information and Good Governance Act 2012 MINISTRY OF PRESIDENCY Transparency and Accountability of Official Development Assistance Improvement of the Information System. Publication of the annual report on budget implementation. Plan covering the documents to be published on the website. 2012 quarter 2013 2012 MINISTRY OF FOREING AFFAIRS AND COOPERATION Organic Law on Budget Stability and Financial Sustainability First quarter 2012 MINISTRY OF THE FINANCE AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Amendment of the Subsidies Act 2013 MINISTRY OF THE FINANCE AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION E-Justice Administration 2012-2013 MINISTRY OF JUSTICE Social Network to facilitate citizen participation 2012 MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS Publishing crime statistics 2012 MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS Revising and streamlining regulations 2012-2014 MINISTRY OF THE PRESIDENCY
Commitment 8 Improving monitoring of the Local Content Policy (LCP) especially around monitoring the implementation of activities and improving linkages with MDAs in order to improve local participation and accountability in the process. Lead implementing agency Ministry of Trade & Industry Names of responsible person From implementing agency Hon Mabinty Daramy, Title, Department Government Cabinet Minister, Ministry of Trade & Industry. Email Phone Others Government Actors Involved CSOs, private sector, working groups multilaterals Ministry of Labour & Social security, Citizens Committee, Network Movement of Justice & development, Federation of Civil Society, Human Right Commission, NATCOM. Main objective The objective is to ensure sufficient linkage between the local economy and foreign enterprises in Sierra Leone through effective monitoring and Evaluation of the Local Content Policy. Brief description of Commitment (140 character limit) This commitment is to bring to the fore a mechanism for effective linkage between the local economy and foreign entrepreneurship investment. It takes into cognizance the implementation of a LCP and its relevance on the people of Sierra Leone as they strive to integrate proactively into the local economy. Relevance This Commitment speaks to civic participation public accountability and empowerment which is a critical booster to a thriving economy. In the Sierra Leone case, a sound integration of the local economy and foreign investment is key in answering the current aspiration of becoming a middle-income country by 2025. If well-articulated it is supposed to be perennial to our poverty reduction strife and our ‘Agenda for Prosperity’. It is supposed to aid employment, entrepreneur knowledge and the linkage to the international market.
Completion level Not started Limited Substantial Completed YES Description of the results NMA and MoFED staff have been capacitated on open data use Currently all mining contracts published on the NMA website The needs of the Mining communities are been addressed through the Community Development Agreements (CDA). Implementation due in the next few months End Date June 2016 Next steps Key stakeholders symposium on contract execution and report of the discussions disseminated to stakeholders. Furthermore all participating companies in the symposium to provide CRS policy and yearly work plan; and the National Mineral Agency to conduct yearly assessment of the submitted in order to ensure compliance. Additional information (Description on what remains to be achieved And any risks or challenges to implement the commitment.
Commitment 10 10. Implementation of the Right to Access Information Law. Lead implementing agency Ministry of Information & Communication (MoIC) Names of responsible person From implementing agency Hon Alpha Kanu Title, Department Government Minister, MoIC Email Phone Others Government Actors Involved CSOs, private Right to Access Information Commission,
1, Introduction and Background Introduced in 2013, “Government 3.0” refers to President Park Geun-hye administration’s government reform to boost transparency, information sharing, communication, and cooperation in overall state affairs management. In short, Government 3.0 initiative is a paradigm change in all state affairs, which pursues people-centered management from the existing state-centered one. Under the initiative, the Korean government has striven to become a transparent, competent, and service-oriented government. As part of an effort to become a transparent government, it opened and shared government-owned data to citizens and encouraged them to participate in the policy-making process. Also, in order to become a competent government, it removed barriers between the government divisions to promote inter-departmental collaboration and established scientific administration by harnessing big data. Lastly, as a service-oriented government, it provided customized public services to individuals and offered one-stop services to businesses. Government 3.0 reflects core values of Open Government Partnership (OGP) initiative, and has proved itself to be an effective means to promote open and innovative government at the local and national level. 2. National Action Plan Process The Progress Report 2012-2013 stated that is no evidence that the government held consultations during the formation of the National Action Plan as well as during the implementation stage. However, from the initial stage of “Government 3.0” and NAP development, Open Data Strategy Council (ODSC) was created to develop the Master Plan (lst Master Plan was adopted by ODSC in December 2013) and year policy plans and to monitor progress. The ODSC has 35 members, including
Sub lot 3 estimated construction cost in excess of €3.0m (ex VAT), medium to high complexity Regional Lot B: East and Midlands (Dublin, Kildare, Laois, Longford, Louth, Meath, Offaly, Westmeath, Wicklow) Sub lot 1 estimated construction cost less than €1.5m (ex VAT), low complexity Sub lot 2 estimated construction cost between €1.5m and €3.0m (ex VAT), medium complexity Sub lot 3 estimated construction cost between €3.0m and €5.0m (ex VAT), medium to high complexity Sub-lot 4 estimated construction in excess of €5.0m (ex VAT), high complexity Regional Lot C: Southern (Carlow, Cork, Kerry, Kilkenny, Limerick, Tipperary, Waterford Wexford) Sub lot 1 estimated construction cost less than €1.5m (ex VAT), low complexity Sub lot 2 estimated construction cost between €1.5m and €3.0m (ex VAT), medium complexity Sub lot 3 estimated construction cost between €3.0m and €5.0m (ex VAT), medium to high complexity Sub-lot 4 estimated construction in excess of €5.0m (ex VAT), high complexity -------------------------------- Press Office, Department of Public Expenditure & Reform 604 5164
Please describe any other deviations or amendments to the organic system plan made during the previous year and any other additions or deletions intended to be taken in the coming year pursuant to §205.200 that have not otherwise been disclosed to QCS or described above. F. Affirmation This affirmation is submitted as part of the Organic Grower Plan Update application to allow QCS to assess the ongoing compliance of the certified operation with the National Organic Program Final Rule contained in 7 CFR 205. I have reviewed the Organic System Plan previously submitted to QCS and updated any and all sections in which the Organic System Plan has changed. I understand that knowingly submitting information to QCS, including falsely attesting that there have been no change in the Organic System Plan, constitutes a false statement under §205.100 of the NOP Final Rule and §1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and may subject me and/or the certified operation to criminal and civil penalties. Further, I understand that certification under the NOP Final Rule and QCS policies creates a continuing obligation to inform QCS of all changes, additions, and deletions to the Organic System Plan. A failure to provide complete and truthful disclosure of changes to the