zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
MONITORING INFORMATION FOR MONITORING PURPOSES ONLY Teemore Engineering Ltd monitors the applications it receives for jobs in order to ensure that their recruitment practices promote equality of opportunity and are in compliance with Section 75 of the Northern Ireland Act. This information will be treated in the strictest confidence and protected from misuse, and will not form part of your application. It will be used only for the purpose of monitoring and informing our equal opportunity employment policy. Please indicate your religion or the religion to which you would be perceived to belong by ticking the appropriate box below: Protestant Community Roman Catholic Community – please specify ……………………………………………… None Please indicate your gender by ticking the appropriate box below: Male Female Please provide: Date of Birth ………………………………… Postcode ……………………………………. the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 a person is considered to have a disability if he/she has a physical or mental impairment which has substantial and long-term adverse effect on his/her ability to carry out normal day to day activities. Do you consider that you meet this definition of disability? Yes No
18 -25 26-64 65 & over Please select the option which best describes your sexual orientation Lesbian Gay Bisexual Heterosexual I do not wish to disclose Please indicate your religion or belief Atheism Buddhism Christianity Islam Jainism Sikhism Judaism Hinduism Any other Please specify I do not wish to disclose Equality Act 2010 Do you consider yourself to have a disability? Yes No I do not wish to disclose Please state the type of impairment which applies to you. People may experience more than one type of impairment, in which case you may indicate more than one. If none of the categories apply please select ‘Other’. Physical Impairment Sensory Impairment Mental Health Problem Learning Disability/Difficulty Long standing illness Other The Equality Act 2010 protects disabled people including those with long term health conditions, learning disabilities and so called hidden disabilities such as dyslexia. If you tell us you have a disability we can make reasonable adjustment to ensure than the selection process including interview is fair and equitable. Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 Croydon Clinical Commissioning Group undertakes not to discriminate unfairly against applicants on the basis of a criminal conviction. Are you currently bound over, or do you have any unspent convictions issued by a Court Court Martial in the UK or any other country? Yes No
MONITORING N-AWARDS Students will be considered to have satisfactorily completed a course if, in the principal’s view, there is sufficient evidence that they have met the following course completion criteria: (a) followed the course developed or endorsed by the Board; and (b) applied yourself with diligence and sustained effort to the set tasks and experiences provided in the course by the school; and (c) achieved some or all of the course outcomes. For courses where school assessment marks are submitted, students must make a genuine attempt at assessment tasks that total more than 50% of the available school assessment marks for that course. If the principal determines that the above course completion criteria are not being met, a HSC assessment monitoring process has been implemented. This process ensures that students will be given written warning in sufficient time to correct any problems regarding the satisfactory completion of course requirements; and have the opportunity to appeal to the school against this N-determination. The Board of Studies indicates that a student who has not complied with the above requirements cannot be regarded as having satisfactorily completed the course □ Preliminary □ HSC COURSE: _________________________________ Unresolved Assessment Task Weight(s) Class Attendance E.g. 30/50 lessons N Award Letter(s) Unsatisfactory Progress/ Behavior letter(s) Parent Interview(s) Parent phone contact Referrals to Learning Support Team Formal student interview(s) Faculty Monitoring Card(s) School Monitoring Card(s) Faculty Improvement Programs Student’s Name % See e.g. Dates Dates Dates Dates Dates Dates Dates Dates Dates Student X (How to fill out the table) Task 1 15% Task 2 20% Total = 35% 30/50 (60%) 8/12/09 10/3/10 20/10/09 21/4/10 20/2/10 18/2/10 19/4/10 10/11/09 21/3/10 9/10/09 12/12/09 14/3/10 18/4/10 3/11/09 18/4/10 3/5/10 20/4/10
Total Unresolved Assessment Task Weight(s) Class Attendance E.g. 30/50 lessons N Award Letter(s) Unsatisfactory Progress/ Behavior letter(s) Parent Interview(s) Parent phone contact Referrals to Learning Support Team Formal student interview(s) Faculty Monitoring Card(s) School Monitoring Card(s) Faculty Improvement Programs Student’s Name % See e.g. Dates Dates Dates Dates Dates Dates Dates Dates Dates Student X (How to fill out the table) Task 1 15% Task 2 20% Total = 35% 30/50 (60%) 8/12/09 10/3/10 20/10/09 21/4/10 20/2/10 18/2/10 19/4/10 10/11/09 21/3/10 9/10/09 12/12/09 14/3/10 18/4/10 3/11/09 18/4/10 3/5/10 20/4/10
No. Process Form Timeline Date Responsible Office/ Person Initial Received Action Completed If complete/clear specifications, conduct Price Monitoring to determine Agency Budget for the Contract (ABC) 6 Once ABC is determined, prepare Request For Quotation (RFQ) with Quotation Form (PQF) RFQ/PQF Procurement Division/Unit/ Focal 7 Post RFQ in the PhilGEPS, website of the Procuring Entity and at any conspicuous place in the premises if ABC is above Php50,000.00* 3 days – 9 days Procurement Division/Unit/ Focal 8 Send RFQ to at least three (3) suppliers 1 day Procurement Division/Unit/ Focal 9 Prepare Abstract of Price Quotations upon receipt of at least three (3) quotations within the prescribed deadline. For SVP, receipt of at least one (1) quotation is sufficient to proceed with the evaluation thereof. APQ 1 – 2 days Procurement Division/Unit/ Focal End-User 10 Check the completeness and validity of the documentary requirements of the supplier with the Lowest Calculated and Responsive Quotation. Procurement Division/Unit/ Focal >If not complete, coordinate with the supplier the submission of the required documents 11 Prepare Purchase Order/Job Order PO/JO Procurement Division/Unit/ Focal 12 Process the Obligation Request/Purchase Order/Job Order ORS/PO/ JO 1 - 3 days Budget Accounting Approving Authority 13 Provide the winning supplier copy of the approved PO/JO for conforme 1 day Procurement Division/Unit/ Focal * Deadline for submission may be extended thrice, if none or less than the required number of quotations is received.
No. Process Form Timeline Date Responsible Office/ Person Initial Received Action Completed 14 Delivery Period 7 days (PO) 30-45 days (JO) Supplier 15 Inspect and Accept deliveries IAR 1 day Inspector Procurement Division/Unit/ 16 Prepare RIS/ICS/PAR for the issuance of delivered goods to end-users RIS/ICS/ PAR Procurement Division/Unit/ Focal Total No. of Days > With available stocks 1 day > Without posting for PR Php50,000.00 and below Purchase Order 15 - 17 days Job Order 38 - 55 days > With PhilGEPS Posting for PR above Php50,000.00 Purchase Order 18 - 26 days Job Order 41 - 64 days Note: Please do not detach. Return to Procurement Division/Unit/Focal
TESDA-OP-AS-04-F05 Rev. No. 00 – 03/01/17 PROCUREMENT MONITORING REPORT TESDA Region ___ As of _________________ Procurement Program/ Project PMO/End-User Mode of Procurement PURCHASE REQUEST PhilGEPs Posting/RFQ Source of Funds * No. of Received Date of APQ Winning Supplier PURCHASE/JOB DATE Date Received No. Date Published Closing Date ABC No. Date Amount Approval Date Date Served and Acknow- ledged by the supplier Delivery Inspection Acceptance Issuance *Source of Funds – Regular MOOE/Capital Outlay/Others (SSP/Trust Fund)
Serve Monitoring Plan For AmeriCorps Subgrantees 2016-2017 Monitoring Tool Who Timing Where Financial Risk Assessment DOA audit review Financial Management Survey New Programs DOA Audit review – after award notification but before official contract FMS – completed with application DOA Desk Audit Review Existing Programs As audits are received DOA Fiscal Reports (PERs and AFRs; Only Invoices for Fixed-Amount Programs) All Programs Monthly/quarterly Desk Progress Report Review All Programs At three times per year Desk Program Assessment* All Programs Once per year before on-site visit Desk Member File Review* All Programs Once per year On-site Member Eligibility Check All Programs Once per year Desk Document Review New Programs and once 3 years for existing programs First year and then once every 3-year cycle or if there are extensive document changes Desk Financial Desk Review New + Approx. 1/3 of Existing Cost Reimbursement Programs Review may be completed by a contracted accounting firm or Serve Wisconsin staff Desk Performance Measure Review New Programs and once every 3 years for existing programs First year and then once every 3-year cycle or if there are performance measurement changes On-site Statewide Evaluation All programs Member evaluation annually Online or by contractor Program Director Interview New Programs or change in program or Serve WI staff First year or if changes occur On-site Financial Director Interview New Programs or change in program or Serve WI staff First year or if changes occur On-site Member/Supervisor Interview or Member Focus Group Optional tool As necessary On-site * Due to Serve Wisconsin staff capacity or other documentable special circumstances, the Program Assessment and Member File Review may be delayed or waived for one program year for programs assessed as being low-risk programs.
Instructor Interview/Survey These forms are used to gather information to use in the analysis and discussion of the program’s performance. Stakeholder Interview/Survey These forms are used to gather information to use in the analysis and discussion of the program’s performance. FOUR WEEKS BEFORE MONITORING: SCHEDULE PROGRAM REVIEW ACTIVITIES Approximately one month before the monitoring process, programs will be contacted by phone by the department’s lead consultant to coordinate a detailed schedule for the onsite or desktop monitoring. The purpose of this call is to discuss logistical details of the monitoring and to address any concerns with the pre-monitoring documentation review. The following activities will be scheduled to occur when the department’s team visits your program: ON-SITE MONITORING ACTIVITIES ACTIVITY GUIDING DOCUMENTS LOCAL PARTICIPANTS Entrance Conference On-site Monitoring Schedule Program Coordinator Interviews Monitoring Tool: Program Design and Leadership Community Interaction and Outreach Curriculum, Instruction and Professional Development Technical Assistance Worksheet will be completed as needed. Program Coordinator Interviews Monitoring Tool: Accountability - Data Entry and Management Program Coordinator Data Specialist Interviews Monitoring Tool: Accountability - Fiscal Management Program Coordinator Fiscal Officer Interviews Monitoring Tool: One-Stop System Integration – WIOA WIOA Core Partners Class Site Visits Instructor Interviews Monitoring Tool: Learner Progress Curriculum, Instruction and Professional Development Classroom Review Form Instructors Participant Interviews Participant Interview Form AEL Participants Team Meeting Monitoring Tool: all sections Exit Conference, Part 1 Monitoring Tool: all sections Program Coordinator Exit Conference, Part 2 Monitoring Tool: all sections Program Coordinator Administrative Supervisor
MONITORING SHEET FOR OPERATIONAL PLAN 2014 1ST and 2nd Quarter OFFICE: Research and Extension MFO SPG PROJECT/ACTIVITY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR BASELINE 2013 ACTUAL OUTPUT (January-June) ACTUAL BUDGET SPENT (Jan-June) ASSESSMENT (DIFFICULTIES/REMARKS) RECOMMENDATIONS MFO3 SPG3 R&D Implementation No. of studies completed 58 25 P100,000 - Unpredictable weather conditions disturbed implementation No. of on-going studies 50 40 5M Procurement procedures delayed implementation of research activities - Dialogue with Admin on how to fast track procurement No. of approved proposals 30 20 P200,000 5 proposals did not fall under research priority areas -Update research priority areas
There are several pro-formas which are used for monitoring purposes, and these can be found in the monitoring pro-forma file in the Head teachers office. All staff are welcome to view these in advance of any monitoring taking place. include: Use of accommodation Empty classroom Displays Presentation and Marking Homework Reading Record Logs/ Home school Link books SEND files Gender balance Learning styles Teaching and Learning Subject team reports Collective Worship Lesson observations Lunchtime Supervisor role Subject Leaders analysis of subject Progress of pupils Monitoring and Evaluation The subject teams will also monitor their subjects as appropriate, in a cycle relating to the Strategic Development Plan. The monitoring cycle encourages all members of a subject team to participate in monitoring. Lesson observations will be carried out initially by the subject leader with a member of the Leadership Team, and then with the subject leader working with another subject team member. This encourages consistency in observations and trains the team members so that everyone is experienced at lesson observation. Policy reviewed: April 2014 Approved by the Full Governing Body Kay Allen 28/4/14 (signed: Chair of Full Governing Body)
TSQF Internal Verification documentation Monitoring Assessor Performance via observation OBSERVATION REPORT Name of Assessor: Name of Candidate: Date of Observation: Summary of observation and feedback: I agree that the above notes are a true evidential record of assessor performance during this observation. Assessor Name: Assessor Signature __________________________ Date: Internal Verifier Name: Internal Verifier Signature: __________________________ Date:
Cover Sheet and Recording Sheet - Wildlife CONTACT DETAILS AEC Project # RA/ Project : Monitoring Start Date : Chief Investigator : Ph: Emergency Contact : Ph: Monitor 1 : Ph: Monitor 2 : Ph: under supervision until competent Person responsible for euthanasia Ph: Other experts : Ph: Animal Welfare Officer (AWO) AWO Ph: 0428 021 529 SPECIES MONITORING CRITERIA List behaviours and signs that will be assessed to determine the wellbeing of the animal. For example, body condition, locomotion, movement, signs of injury, ants present, respiration rate. MONITORING FREQUENCY Describe monitoring regime including frequency of animal assessment and weighing. ACTIONS AND INTERVENTIONS – (Either as a table OR as a flow chart) Welfare Impact NB There may be different actions and interventions depending on: 1) whether the welfare impact is the result of the research 2) whether this is a target research animal, by-catch or pest species. Actions/Interventions – research related welfare impact Actions/Interventions – No deviation from normal Continue standard monitoring. No interventions required. Slight/Moderate deviation from normal Reassess in xx minutes Assess for euthanasia For this project, insert appropriate actions and interventions for this assessment. Release Moderate/Severe deviation from normal Immediate euthanasia Check section 17D of approved AEC application Contact the AWO if required. Immediate euthanasia Additional Interventions for specific issues By-catch Pest Species Biosecurity and Agricultural Management Act 2007 (WA) 23. Dealing with declared pest (1) Except as otherwise provided in the regulations or in a management plan, a person must not (c) release into the environment the declared pest, or an animal, plant or other thing that is infected or infested with the declared pest.
Monitoring Criteria and Scores – RAT General criteria 0 1 2 Activity – i.e. movement around the cage Bright, Alert, Responsive (BAR) Normal – mobile and active Somewhat and/or intermittent stillness as compared to others Will only move if approached or reluctant to move when touched. Moderately reduced activity, dull, lethargic Body Posture Normal Somewhat and/or intermittent hunched appearance Moderate/continuous hunching and still Gait Normal Somewhat and/or intermittent lameness or other gait abnormality Moderate/continuous lameness or other gait abnormality Social Behaviour (only relevant for group housed animals) Normal Somewhat or intermittently separate from others Completely separate or isolated from others Coat quality/Skin condition Normal. Coat flat and glossy, showing evidence of normal grooming behaviour Somewhat ruffled or unkempt or mild piloerection. Somewhat scaly, scurfy or reddened or discolouration of skin. Moderately ruffled or moderate piloerection consistent with failure to groom. Moderate scale and scurf, scratches or moderate discolouration of skin. Body Condition (see diagram below) Animal is Vertebrae and dorsal pelvis not prominent; palpable with slight pressure. (see diagram BC 3) NA Animal is under conditioned. Segmentation of vertebral column evident. Dorsal pelvic bones readily palpable. (see diagram BC 2) Facial Expression (see diagram below) Normal Slight or intermittent narrowing of the eyes and/or flattening of the ears. (as per diagram) Moderate narrowing of the eyes and/or flattening of the ears. (as per diagram) presenting signs/symptoms Although the most relevant monitoring criteria have been selected, if a circumstance arises where there are additional presenting signs or behaviours, these must be acknowledged, scored, recorded and reported to the AWO as an adverse event. Slight or intermittent or possible deviation from normal for this sign. Moderate or consistent or definite deviation from normal but not marked, for this sign.
Job Application Monitoring & Evaluation Officer REF: MEO/0818 Applicants must complete the application form in either font size 12, or legible block capitals using black ink. Closing date for applications – 16:00 on 17 August 2018 DECLARATION I have read and understood the information provided in the Candidate Information Booklet. I undertake to inform the Victims and Survivors Service in writing of any changes in my circumstances which may occur between the date of my application and any possible date of appointment. The responses detailed in this application form are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief. I understand that if I am found to have suppressed any material fact or to have given false answers I will be liable to disqualification or, if appointed, to dismissal. I confirm I am aged 16 or over. I give my consent for a criminal record check to be carried out as detailed in the ‘Vetting’ section of the Candidate Information Booklet. Signed: Date:
EDUCATION : Name of school/ college Qualification / Level Subject Grade Awarded Date Gained FURTHER / HIGHER EDUCATION: Include information on undergraduate and postgraduate degrees, diplomas, evening and correspondence courses, vocational or technical courses. Name of University/College Qualification / Level Subject Grade /Classification Awarded Date Gained PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS Please provide details of any professional memberships you hold.
Monitoring EYPP spend Idea for EYPP funding Reason for choice Format Monitoring of impact Working alongside a consultant to develop practice in relation to engaging parents Network identified that were some parents who were less well engaged with their child’s learning. The premise staff have begun from is that they are hard to reach rather than the parents being hard to reach. The consultant will provide a series of inputs and will be action research type activities between the sessions. Staff have monitored who they interact with at transition times over a period of time. This is providing a baseline and gives a clear indication of which parents might need more encouragement or different strategies to enable them to engage. The monitoring will be repeated again after the intervention and the impact can then be assessed. Discussion between parent and key person. of a loan library EYPP children had been identified as being less experienced in speech. It was felt these children would benefit from opportunities to revisit experiences offered in the 6 home learning packs were developed which could be borrowed. The thinking behind the packs was shared with the parents. A more secluded and intimate The individual tracking of the EYPP children has progress has been accelerated in this group of children. have made between 3 – 6 steps of progress over a period of time following these interventions. 1 step of progress
setting at home. area was provided, where the packs were stored and utilised in the session. being measured moving from entering to within and within to secure etc. This intervention was further supported by some speech and language and nurturing training. Having an EYPP champion This enables the setting to have a dedicated member of staff who has an overview of the needs, impact, monitoring and analysis of a range of data. Champion has release time to develop plans, monitor and analyse impact. Time to liaise with outside to organise support or training etc. Increased Staff confidence levels. Tracking of this of children. Performance management cycle. Speech and language sessions for parents If parents have a deeper of how young children learn to talk they will be able to support their child and any subsequent children more. Formats vary from one off sessions to a range of sessions. Increase in parents confidence levels. Tracking of CL in child. Informal observations of parent/child interactions at transition times. Discussions between parent and key person. Enrichment activities such as a visit to a wildlife park This outing provides a shared opportunity for child, parent and Setting organised the trip. Parents child. Discussions between families and key person. Use of records eg books made in setting.
The Academy is committed to ensuring that job applicants are treated fairly and consistently and that no one is disadvantaged or discriminated against. Information collected via recruitment monitoring helps the Academy fulfil this commitment and assists greatly in the development and evaluation of employment policy. Information you provide will be treated in strict confidence and will not be seen by anyone involved in the selection process. Person/Role Details Full Name Job Title Location/Establishment Pay Reference for this post (If known) Equal Opportunities As part or our equal opportunities policy we request that you complete the following information. This information is for monitoring purposes only. All information will be treated as confidential and will not be used when short-listing or deciding on whether an applicant is successful or unsuccessful in obtaining employment. The information you provide will help us to ensure that our recruitment procedures are fair by allowing us to identify and eliminate potential areas of discrimination. Please indicate your ethnic origin: Asian or Asian British – Bangladeshi Asian or Asian British – Chinese Asian or Asian British – Indian Asian or Asian British – Other or Asian British – Pakistani Black or Black British – African Black or Black British – Caribbean Black or Black British – Other – Other Mixed Ethnic Group – White & Asian Mixed Ethnic – White & Black African Mixed Ethnic – White & Black Other Ethnic Origin - Arab Prefer not to say White – Welsh/English/Scottish/N.Ireland White – Irish – Other – Gypsy/Irish Traveller Other Ethnic Group: (Please state) Please indicate your Religion/Belief: Buddhist Christian Hindu Jewish Muslim None Other Prefer not to say Sikh
Thank you for taking the time to complete this form This diversity information is collected by government departments managing appointments to the board of public bodies, on behalf of the Cabinet Office and The Office of the Commissioner for Public Appointments (OCPA). This data will not be connected to your name when it is shared, it is supplied anonymously. It is collected for the purposes of measures or decisions with respect to your application for a government public appointment. OCPA collects diversity information in order to produce management information about the public appointments process, and the diversity of the field of applicants. It will be published on OCPA’s website, in summary form, in order to enable government to meet its public sector equality duty under section 149 of the Equality Act 2010 and section 75 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998. This data is collected and held on the basis that you consented to provide this information to departments alongside your application and you have not given notice that you do not wish for your data to be processed for this purpose. This data may be held for up to 5 years by OCPA, Cabinet Office and the Government Department, who are the of the data. This data shared with Cabinet Office IT suppliers, identified as processors, in order to securely collect and store the data.
Do you hold any other public appointments? This includes all non-departmental public bodies (NDPBs), NHS bodies, parole boards and research councils. It does not include sitting as a school governor, being a magistrate or any positions within charities. Significant Political Activity Have you undertaken any significant political activity for a political in the last five years? Significant political activity is defined as being employed by a political party, holding significant office in a party, standing as a candidate for a party in an election, having publicly spoken on behalf of a political party or having made significant donations or loans to a party. Significant loans and donations are those of a size which are reported to the Electoral Commission, in line with a central party’s reporting threshold. If yes, please indicate the parties: Conservative Labour Liberal Democrats Independent Other party (please specify) Other information Declaration of interests and ensuring public confidence Do you have any business or personal interests that might be relevant to the work of the body for which you have applied and which could lead to a real or perceived conflict of interests were you to be appointed? NHS Improvement has a duty to ensure that those we appoint to NHS boards are of good character, have not been associated with any serious misconduct or mismanagement relating to any current or past office or employment, and will ensure an open and honest culture across all levels of the organisation. Is there anything in either your professional or personal history which may affect your suitability for appointment to this post or may cause embarrassment or bring the organisation into disrepute, were you to be appointed? If you answered yes to either question, please give details below. This information will be shared with the selection panel and should you be invited to interview, the selection panel will explore this in the context of performing the role for which you are applying. Failures to disclose such information could result in an appointment being terminated. Please tell us how you found out about this post:
Table 4. Rates of severe CDI and mortality due to severe CDI in Victoria, 2012-2015 Year Total patient days Number CDI cases Severe CDI cases (% of total CDI cases) due to severe CDI (% of total CDI cases) 2012 5,868,315 1812 26 (1.43) 17 (0.94) 2013 4,696,220 1553 27 (1.74) 7 (0.45) 2014 4,859,297 1567 28 (1.79) 11 (0.70) 2015 4,960,991 1634 36 (2.20) 11 (0.67) Overall 20,384,823 6566 117 (1.78) 46 (0.70) Commentary The rate of severe disease appears has remained constant over the data period and little change was observed in the mortality rate associated with severe CDI. In 2015, a of 19,616,532 patient days were recorded in Australia. Based on the average rates calculated for Victoria between 2012 and 2015, it is estimated that there would have been 113 cases of severe disease and 44 cases where severe CDI resulted in death in Australia in 2015. Table 5. Prevalence of severity criteria among patients with severe CDI in Victoria, 2011-2017 Severity Criteria 1 (ICU admission only) Severity Criteria 2 (Surgery only) Severity Criteria 3 (Death only) Severity Criteria 1&2 (ICU + Surgery) Severity Criteria 1&3 (ICU + Death) Severity Criteria 2&3 (Surgery +Death) All criteria 83 (45.9%) 11 (6.1%) 49 (27.1%) 17 (9.4%) 6 (3.3%) 4 (2.2%) 11 (6.1%) Commentary Between 2012 and 2016, severe CDI represented 1.8% (117/6566) of all CDI cases in Victoria. The most prevalent marker of severe CDI was admission to an intensive care unit due to CDI. Admission to an intensive care unit was associated with approximately 75% of all severe cases and on its own (i.e. not in combination with other markers) accounted for almost half of all severe cases. The least prevalent marker was surgery related to CDI complications, which accounted for only 6% of all severe cases.
Summary of the Impact of Sport Premium at School Aim are the four aims of the Sport Premium funding) National Priority (Includes the 7 key factors to be assessed by Ofsted) School Priority / Action Plan (these are the key actions identified to improve our provision from last year) Actual Impact (the difference it has made or will make) Evidence (sign-posts to the sources of evidence) £’s (amount of grant £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £
1 Continuous measurement with Thermistor chain 10 minute intervals 2 day intensive sampling every two hours Twice Weekly 2 Thermistor chain 2 day intensive sampling two hours Twice Weekly 3 Thermistor 2 day intensive sampling every two hours Twice Weekly Weekly 4 Twice Weekly 5 Twice Weekly 6 Thermistor chain 2 day intensive sampling every two hours Twice Weekly 7 1 thermistor 2 day intensive sampling every two hours Twice Weekly 7 b 1 thermistor Weekly Cost estimate Component Measurement Cost Thermistors 4 strings with 7 thermistors @$300 each (optical Stowaways Tidbit) 8400 Phytoplankton monitoring/Cell counts Cell counts at sites twice a week Sampling (counts @ $128.50) Cell counts cost per sample x 14 samples per week by ~12 weeks 21588
Monitoring Schedule Tregolls Academy-Summer 18 Triangulated to the SDP and RAP 19/03/18 26/03/18 16/04/18 23/04/18 30/04/18 07/05/18 14/05/18 21/05/18 04/06/18 11/06/18 18/06/18 25/06/18 02/07/18 09/07/18 Maths-Obj 4 SDP Obj 5 RAP 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 Subj Ldr Lesson observation  Planning-Most Able  Personal and Curricular Targets  Marking and Feedback  pupil consultations  PRR  Maths Home Learning  Maths assessment files  Leader Curric Progress Review   Discovery Maths Monitoring  BIG Maths Book Monitoring  Pupil monitoring-Most Able   Reading Guided Reading lessons (KS 2)  RWI sessions (KS 1)  Pupil conferencing (English)  Reading moderation file  Writing-SDP Obj 5 Writing Lesson observation  Writing Planning-Most Able Personal and Curricular Targets  Writing Marking and Feedback  Writing moderation of portfolios  English Home Learning  Writing PRR  Leader Curric Progress Review   2017/18 CYCLE RAP Obj 2 PSHE monitoring week RE subject monitoring Science subject monitoring week 
1.g. How confident do you feel a session for young people on issues faced by women and girls in the community? Very confident Quite confident Not very confident Not confident at all Please provide reasons for your answer 1.h. How confident do you feel about...Talking to other adults about sexual violence? Very confident Quite confident Not very confident Not confident at all Please provide reasons for your answer 1.i. How confident do you feel about...Running a session for young people about sexual violence? Very confident Quite confident Not very confident Not confident at all Please provide reasons for your answer 1.j. Are there any sessions you feel uncomfortable running? Please give details. 2. Please read the statements below and choose one option, according to whether you strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree or are not sure. Please provide a brief comment to explain your answer. 2.a. I have acquired new knowledge and/or skills from taking part in the programme. Strongly agree Not sure Disagree Strongly disagree Please provide reasons for your answer 2.b. I have felt adequately supported to perform my role as a coach in the programme. Strongly agree Agree Not sure Disagree Strongly disagree Please provide reasons for your answer 2.c. I have experienced challenges in my roles as a coach in the programme. Strongly agree Agree Not sure Disagree Strongly disagree Please provide reasons for your answer
I agree that the contents of this form may be shared with my assessor Candidate Name: Candidate Signature __________________________ Date: Internal Verifier Name: Internal Verifier Signature: __________________________ Date:
lead to improvements in outcomes. This will be done through regular engagement with the Employment Advocates to capture their learning from front line delivery and insight from engaging with households. This approach had been used with the Youth Employment Gateway and found to be extremely beneficial and insightful. As part of this, employment advocates will be supported to maintain a reflective log to capture their views on what has made a difference in the lives of the households that they are supporting. D.11 A proportion of households engaged in the test will be interviewed to capture a richer picture of what has and has not worked for them, and how the support could have been improved. Data requirements D.12 These will vary according to project and the focus of evaluation, however illustrations are listed below. Metric Frequency Source Inputs: 1. Total investment (£) 2. In-kind contributions (£) Annually Annually Programme Manager Programme Manager Outputs: 1. No. of households engaged 2. No. of support plans developed 3. No. of progress measures achieved 4. No. of qualifications obtained 5. No. of work placements begun 6. No. of work placements completed 7. No. of job interviews 8. No. of referrals to/from other services 9. Resilience of participants Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Programme Manager Programme Manager Programme Manager Programme Manager Programme Manager Programme Manager Programme Manager Programme Manager Programme Manager Outcomes: 1. No. of participants in employment 2. No. of participants in sustained employment 3. Income of participants 4. Resilience score of participants Monthly Monthly Monthly Baseline / End Programme Manager Programme Manager Programme Manager Survey Impact: 1. Savings to the Exchequer (£) 2. Economic Impact (£) Annual/ Final report Annual/ Final report Cost-Benefit Analysis Cost-Benefit Analysis Dissemination of findings D.13 Findings from any monitoring and evaluation exercises will be shared with the relevant Combined Authority Members and officers who will a broader dissemination approach.
included. If no emission limit is required, for example, since VOC emissions are less than 25 tpy, then no conditions should be added. Examples of EQUIPMENT SUBJECT TO 40 CFR 60, SUBPART KKK Inlet compression Turbine(s) X and associated valves and piping Cryogenic Liquids Extraction Plant Tank farm Truck loading rack Amine Treater Sulfur Recovery Unit Dehydrator EQUIPMENT SUBJECT TO 40 CFR 60, SUBPART KKK (1) in LLS – Light Liquid Service 60.482-2 (2) PRDs – Pressure Relief Devices 60.482-4 (3) G/VS – Gas/Vapor Service 60.482-4 (4) OEVs – Open Ended Valves 60.482-6 (5) OELs – Open Ended Lines 60.482-6 (6) Pumps and valves in heavy liquid service, pressure relief devices in light liquid or heavy liquid service, and flanges and other connectors. §60.482-8 (7) CVSCDs – Closed Vent Systems & Control Devices §60.482-10 (8) Valves in G/VS & LLS 60.482-7 (10) Compressors 60.482.3 MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FOR EQUIPMENT SUBJECT TO 40 CFR 60, SUBPART KKK Process Unit Pumps in LLS(1) PRDs(2) in G/VS(3) Valves in G/VS(3) & LLS(1) (6) (7) 60.633 (b)(1) & (b)(4)(i) & (ii) 60.482-8 (a) & (f)(1) & (2)
24-Mar-17 11.47 15.30 25-Mar-17 15.68 10.33 26-Mar-17 19.52 13.07 27-Mar-17 12.25 15.34 28-Mar-17 15.23 39.20 29-Mar-17 10.18 22.47 30-Mar-17 12.66 32.79 31-Mar-17 18.39 21.14 Data received: Data published: Blast Vibration & Overpressure Blast Date (Only blasts where monitors were triggered) Highest Offsite Vibration Result (mm/sec) Limit (mm/sec) Upper Limit (mm/sec) Compliant? Overpressure Result (dB/L) Limit (dB/L) Compliant? 1-Mar-17 2-Mar-17 3-Mar-17 3.99 98.8 4-Mar-17 0.9 102.8 5-Mar-17 6-Mar-17 5.75 101 7-Mar-17 5.52 107 8-Mar-17 9-Mar-17 10-Mar-17 9.52 104.2 11-Mar-17 12-Mar-17 13-Mar-17 5.05 101 14-Mar-17 15-Mar-17 16-Mar-17 17-Mar-17 1.04 102.8 18-Mar-17 1.24 104.2 19-Mar-17 1.24 109.5 20-Mar-17 0.94 88 21-Mar-17 22-Mar-17 0.97 91.5 23-Mar-17 7.47 101 24-Mar-17 0.98 94 25-Mar-17 26-Mar-17 27-Mar-17 2.09 95.9
Monk, R. L., & Heim, D. (2013a). Environmental context effects on alcohol-related outcome expectancies, efficacy, and norms: A field study. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27, 814-818. Monk, R. L., & Heim, D. (2013b). Panoramic projection: Affording a wider view on contextual influences on alcohol-related cognitions. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 21, 1-7. Monk, R.L., Sunley, J., Qureshi, A.W., & Heim, D. (2016). Smells like inhibition: The effects of olfactory and visual alcohol cues on inhibitory control. Psychopharmacology, 233, 1331–1337. Moodie, C. (2015). ways of using tobacco packaging to communicate health messages: Interviews with packaging and marketing experts. Addiction Research & Theory, 24, 54-61. Moss, A. C., M. M., Harkin, J., Albery, I. P., Rycroft, N., & Nikčević, A. V. (2015). ‘Neknomination’: Predictors in a sample of UK university students. Addictive Behaviors Reports, 1, 73-75. Moss, A. C., Albery, I. P., Dyer, K. R., Frings, D., Humphreys, K., Inkelaar, T., ... & Speller, A. (2015). The effects of responsible drinking messages on attentional allocation and drinking behaviour. Addictive Behaviors, 44, 94-101. Munafò, M. R., Roberts, N., Bauld, L., & Leonards, U. (2011). Plain packaging increases visual attention to health warnings on cigarette packs in non‐smokers and weekly smokers but not daily smokers. Addiction, 106(8), 1505-1510.
Monk, C. (2015, February) Development Begins before Birth: Women’s Experiences during Pregnancy Influence Children’s Neurobehavioral Trajectories. American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY. Monk, C. (2012, March). Fetal Origins of Mental Health: Strengths, Weaknesses, & Possible Pathways. Imprints/Life Course Seminars, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY. Monk, C. (2005, December). Stress During pregnancy: Keeping Psychology in the Equation. Presented at the Stress and Health CCIM conference, Center for Complementary and Integrative Medicine, Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY. Monk, C. (2002, September). Dreaming for Two: A Roundtable Discussion on the Emotional Life of the Expectant Mother. Presented at the 92nd Street Y Discussion on the Emotional Life of the Expectant Mother, New York, NY. Monk, C. (2000, November). Stress & Mood Disorders During Pregnancy: Implications for Development. Invited presentation to the New York State Office of Mental Health, Albany, NY.
major development areas was seen as one of the core tasks of LCTF and early steps were taken to establish an implementable proposal for Monkerton. E.ON had already demonstrated that they were a utility that would deliver DH in partnership with others by virtue of their work on Cranbrook. 4.2 Their proposal was to provide a Combined Heat and Power plant and a pipe network to serve the whole Monkerton development. The scheme would be funded by E.ON corporate funding, financed by a long term revenue stream from heat sales, with the funding gap filled by a fixed connection fee for each property connected to the DH system. The revenue stream would be guaranteed by the developers offering a long term concession to E.ON, with a commitment not to run low pressure gas to the site for individual consumers. That would be delivered by the signing of Heads of Terms, followed by a binding legal agreement. Initially, the concept was to use the CHP plant already operating at the Met Office in the southern part of the site. This would have provided sufficient heat for one of the developers who had engaged very positively in the discussions on delivering DH but this was for a scheme serving just under1000 dwellings. 4.3 As the proposal developed, it was clear that a single site wide system was needed, serving nearly 3,000 dwellings. The Met Office CHP was not big enough for this,nor, because of building constraints, could it be expanded to cope with the higher load. After discussions with the landowners (and failure to secure a site on any of the land already owned by the housebuilders), Devon County Council agreed to lease E.ON a site on land that they owned. As this was immediately adjacent to the M5 and in a depression next to the motorway embankment, this was an ideal location for the Energy Centre. Provision was made for the network to be expanded under the M5 to serve additional residential sites being brought forward in east Devon and to serve the Science Park which had planning consent and was proceeding. 4.4 At this stage (Spring 2012), the proposal offered by E.ON was for an 80 year concession, with a connection fee of £4900 for 2900 dwellings. The developers’ response was mixed, with an acceptance that DH in principle was acceptable, but they had concerns about the level of the connection fee in a market that was only just beginning to recover from the 2008 crash and strong reservations about why only E.ON were in the frame, as opposed to a more competitive
Evidence or paraphrase Elaboration / explanation of how this evidence supports ideas or argument Sergeant-Major Morris “He took something out of his pocket and proffered it.” “Hold it up in your right hand and wish aloud…” He accepted “a trifle” from Mr. White for the paw. Herbert White “Likely,” said Herbert, with pretended horror. “Why we’re to be rich, and famous and happy. Wish to be an emperor, Father, to begin with; then you can’t be bossed around.” “Well, I don’t see the money….and I bet I never shall.” “I expect you’ll see the gains.” Mrs. White Curiosity – “Monkey’s Paw?” “And what is there special about it?” “And did you really have three wishes granted?” “And has anybody else wished?” “No….we’ll have one more…..wish our boy alive again.” “Wish!” “You’re afraid of your own son…Herbert; I’m coming.” Mr. White “White…stooped down and snatched it off.” “…give it to me.” “I don’t know what to wish for….It seems to me I’ve got all I want.” “I wish for two hundred pounds.”
Customer Approval Form Details Name Required Data Type Description Actual Hours Yes Decimal The actual hours spent on this job. Engineer Notes No Text A entry of notes related to this job. Customer Name Yes Text The name of the customer approving this job. Customer Signature Yes Image A digital drawing of the customer signature. This can be provided via touch input or using a mouse. If a mistake is made, then the Clear Signature button can reset the field. Confirmation Checkbox Yes Checkbox This checkbox confirms that the customer is satisfied with the job. Job Sheet Completion Notifications Following submission of the customer approval form, a series of notification events take place. The goal of this process is to inform relevant users and teams about the completion of this job sheet. This means that the right people have the information they need to proceed. Notifications are provided in the form of tasks and emails. Job Sheet Completed Task This is assigned to the Account owner but is only assigned to the Case owner if this Job Sheet has a Case. Job Completed Email This e-mail is sent from the creator of the Job Sheet. It is delivered to the Account owner but is only delivered to the Case owner if this Job Sheet has a Case. A sample e-mail is shown below. Dear Mikey, Job Sheet JS:10 has been completed on 7/22/2016. Further details can be found below. Account Name: Business Consultants Contact Name: Mikey Smith Contact Main Phone: 0202 777777 Account Address: Street 1 Street 2 Street 3 City State/Province Zip/Postal Code Country/Region Type: On Premise Chargeable: Chargeable Work Instructions: Go to the 3rd floor, ask for Mikey and repair the VoIP telephone system. Kind Regards, John Smith
How Does Monkeynastix Work? Monkeynastix offers separate curriculums for ages 1-2, 3-6 and 7-8. Why these age groups? Maximum window of Motor Development. Described as a period when learning of a new skill is easier and quicker than any other area in a child’s life. The maximum window of opportunity for fundamental skills such as gross motor and fine motor is between the ages of 1 – 8 years. After 7/8 years old, children enter the sport skill development phase of their lives. A qualified instructor will come to your school to run one fun-filled session per week. Sessions run for 30 minutes, and consist of the following: Warm Up: Body Positions, Music, Locomotion Activity Main Activity: The main pieces of equipment plus sub-stations Ending Activity: Fun, fun, fun! To get the maximum benefit out of our programme, our members are encouraged to complete at least one Monkeynastix cycle of two years. Please see below the lesson plan summary for the 1st term of 2016: No. Lesson Primary Desired Outcomes 1 Demo Class Fun, fun, fun! 2 Parachute Gross Motor, Directionality 3 Flat Beam & Lummi Sticks Balance & Stability 4 Parallel Bar Gross Motor & Spatial Ability 5 Floor Vestibular Sense & Proprioception 6 Balls Eye Hand/Foot Co-ordination & Manipulation of Muscle Movements 7 Trampoline Gross Motor, Locomotion & Co-ordination 8 Speed & Agility (Hoops & Ladders) Gross Motor, Fine Motor & Co-ordination 9 Foam Bricks Balance, General Co-ordination, Spatial Awareness & Control
Evidence Quote or paraphrase Elaboration / explanation of how this evidence supports ideas or argument Sergeant-Major Morris “He took something out of his pocket and proffered it.” “Hold it up in your right hand and wish aloud…” He accepted “a trifle” from Mr. White for the paw. Herbert White “Likely,” said Herbert, with pretended horror. “Why we’re going to be rich, and famous and happy. Wish to be an emperor, Father, to begin with; then you can’t be bossed around.” “Well, I don’t see the money….and I bet I never shall.” “I expect you’ll see the gains.” Mrs. White Curiosity – “Monkey’s Paw?” “And what is there special about it?” “And did you really have three wishes granted?” “And has anybody else wished?” “No….we’ll have one more…..wish our boy again.” “Wish!” “You’re afraid of your own son…Herbert; I’m coming.” Mr. White “White…stooped down and snatched it off.” “…give it to me.” “I don’t know what to wish for….It seems to me I’ve got all I want.” “I wish for two hundred pounds.”