I declare that, upon request and without I will provide the certificates or documentary evidence referred to in this document. I understand that the information will be used in the selection process to assess my organisation’s suitability to be invited to participate further in this procurement. I understand that the authority may reject this submission in its entirety if there is a failure to answer all the relevant questions fully, or if false/misleading information or content is provided in any section. I am aware of the consequences of serious misrepresentation. Section 1 Contact details and declaration Question number Question Response 1.3(a) Contact name 1.3(b) Name of organisation 1.3(c) Role in organisation 1.3(d) Phone number 1.3(e) E-mail address 1.3(f) Postal address 1.3(g) Signature (electronic is acceptable) 1.3(h) Date Part 2: Exclusion Grounds Please answer the following questions in full. Note that every organisation that is being relied on to meet the selection must complete and submit the Part 1 and Part 2 self-declaration. Section 2 Grounds for mandatory exclusion Question number Question Response 2.1(a) Regulations 57(1) and (2) The detailed grounds for mandatory exclusion of an organisation are set out on this , should be referred to before completing these questions. Please indicate if, within the past five you, your organisation or any other person who has powers of representation, decision or control in the organisation been convicted anywhere in the world of any of the offences within the summary below and listed on the . Participation in a criminal organisation. Yes No If Yes please provide details at 2.1(b)
3.1(i) Shown significant or persistent deficiencies in the performance of a substantive requirement under a prior public contract, a prior contract with a contracting entity, or a prior concession contract, which led to early termination of that prior contract, damages or other comparable sanctions? Yes No If yes please provide details at 3.2 3.1(j) 3.1(j) - (i) 3.1(j) - (ii) 3.1(j) –(iii) 3.1(j)-(iv) Please answer the following statements The organisation is guilty of serious misrepresentation in supplying the information required for the verification of the absence of grounds for exclusion or the fulfilment of the selection criteria. The organisation has withheld such information. The organisation is not able to submit supporting documents required under regulation 59 of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015. The organisation has influenced the decision-making process of the contracting authority to obtain confidential information that may confer upon the organisation undue advantages in the procurement procedure, or to negligently provided misleading information that may have a material influence on decisions concerning exclusion, selection or award. Yes No If Yes please provide details at 3.2 Yes No If Yes please provide details at 3.2 Yes No If Yes please provide details at 3.2 Yes No If Yes please provide details at 3.2 3.2 If you have answered Yes to any of the above, explain what measures been taken to demonstrate the reliability of the organisation despite the existence of a relevant ground for exclusion? (Self Cleaning) Conflicts of interest In accordance with question 3.1 (g), the College may exclude the Supplier if there is a conflict of interest which cannot be effectively remedied. The concept of a conflict of interest includes any situation where relevant staff members have, directly or indirectly, a financial, economic or other personal interest which might be perceived to compromise their impartiality and independence in the context of the procurement procedure.
Bus Service & Travel Pass Provision 2017 – 2021 – Service Level Agreement This document shall form the core service level agreement (SLA) between the College and the appointed provider. You are required to complete all sections of this SLA as this will form part of the evaluation and weighting criteria for services under both lots. Note, that if you are bidding for multiple lots, the SLA only needs to be completed once. All SLA’s will be scored on the basis outlined below with scores summarised as in the tender document. For clarity, this shall be as follows: This SLA relates to (please tick) Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4 Lot 5 Evaluation Criteria Score per question Excellent response - Demonstrates significant strengths of service with minimal identified weaknesses in the response and demonstrates appropriate compliance required 10 marks Good response - Demonstrates significant strengths of service with identified weaknesses in the response and demonstrates appropriate compliance required 7 marks Average response - Demonstrates some strengths of service with equal identified weaknesses in the response and demonstrates appropriate compliance where required 4 marks Poor response - Demonstrates weaknesses in the service that is greater than the strength of service demonstrated and demonstrates appropriate compliance where required 1 mark Quality of Service and ability to meet College requirements Your answer will be evaluated against the embedded service level proposal and will be scored in accordance with the criteria identified below Weighting per available mark is 0.04761 There are a total of 630 marks available under this section as detailed in the SLA. Each mark carries a weighting of 0.04761 and the total maximum score available is 30%.Your final score in this section will be determined by your evaluated responses in the document embedded below. 30.00 % Operational requirements Specific Requirement Service Provider Response College Evaluation Score