November 2016. Where the application is inconsistent with the requirements of the conditions, the conditions will prevail. The wastewater discharge authorised by these permits shall be limited to: A maximum 12 month rolling median daily (midnight to midnight) discharge of [applicant to indicate] cubic metres; A maximum discharge of 3,460 cubic metres peak wet weather flow, at approximate map reference NZTopo50 BM35:408-194. The wastewater discharge authorised by these permits shall be limited to: A 12 month rolling daily to of 800 cubic A 95th daily flow of at approximate map Based on statistics from para 7.7 of Mr Crawford’s evidence. Also notes the concern regarding absolutes as flow consent condition. metres ;
reference NZTopo50 BM35:408-194. Environmental Standard By 1 July 2018 of these permits, the permit holder shall have achieved the requirements of Policy 5-11 by either ensuring the discharge is being applied onto or into land, or flowing overland, or passing through an alternative system that mitigates the adverse effects on the mauri of the receiving water body. Delete. This condition is unnecessary. The proposed wetland meets Policy 5-11. This condition introduces uncertainty for the applicant. Within three months of commencement of this permit the Consent Holder shall submit a plan detailing the final plant structured optimisation programme. The programme shall take no longer than 18 months to complete. The plan shall nominate a suitably qualified Based on para 11.26 of Mr Crawford evidence. A suitably qualified technician to be nominated, allows for Horizons compliance officers to have contact regarding the
Monitoring Provision Within [xx] months of commencement of permits, the permit holder shall install signage advising Mangatainoka River users that treated wastewater is being discharge into the location. Within five years of commencement of these permits, the permit holder shall have completed an investigation into alternative methods of treatment and discharge, including land based disposal. The alternative disposal feasibility study shall inform the permit holder’s decision on the best practicable option for treatment and disposal from the Eketahuna Wastewater Treatment Plant. The findings of the feasibility study shall be provided to the Tararua District Wastewater 5. Within ten years of commencement of these permits, the permit holder shall have completed an investigation into alternative methods of treatment and discharge, including land based disposal. The alternative disposal feasibility study shall inform the permit holder’s decision on the best practicable option for treatment and disposal from the Pahiatua Wastewater Treatment Plant. The findings of the feasibility study shall be provided to the Tararua District Wastewater Forum (TDWF), and to the Regulatory Manager of the Regional Council. Longer timeframe is considered appropriate given length of term being recommended
Forum (TDWF), and to the Regulatory Manager of the Regional Council. Within twelve months of commencement of permits, the permit holder shall have completed recreational user’s investigation of the Mangatainoka River [xx] kilometres upstream and [xx] kilometres downstream of the discharge point and mixing zone . Within twelve months of commencement of these permits, the permit holder shall have completed recreational user’s investigation of the Mangatainoka River [xx] kilometres upstream and [xx] kilometres downstream of the discharge point and mixing zone. The permit holder shall inspect the Sewage
the Act, initiate a review of any conditions of these permits in the month of July 2018, July 2020 and July 2024 Any review shall be for the purpose of reviewing the effectiveness of the conditions in avoiding, or mitigating any adverse effects on the environment, which may arise as a result of the exercise of this permit. The review of conditions shall be for the purpose of: The of the monitoring including reviewing the frequency of the monitoring or the required; Requiring with any relevant rule of an operative Regional Plan; The deletion or addition pursuant to section 128 of the Act, initiate a review of any conditions of these permits in the month of July 2020, July 2024 and July 2027 Any review shall be for the purpose of reviewing the effectiveness of the conditions in avoiding, or mitigating any adverse effects on the environment, which may arise as a result of the exercise of this permit. The review of conditions shall be for the purpose of: The of the the of the reflect longer term. Seems like little benefit to allow for a review in July 2018, given it is acknowledged the plant would not yet be fully commissioned.
holder to adopt the best practicable option to remove or reduce any adverse effects on the Assessing the of the treatment plant in terms of the quality of the effluent being discharged to the receiving Reviewing the of the standards in the conditions of this permit in addressing the adverse effects on the River; The review may result in any of the following outcomes to ensure that any to any breach of any any effects on the may arise that are at a later stage; the permit holder to adopt the best option to or reduce any effects on the the permit holder to adopt
The Consent Holder shall keep a complaints register to record complaints relating to discharges of odour or contaminant gases to air arising from the Wastewater Treatment Plant. The register shall include: The details of the complainant if given; The location of the contaminant, e.g. odour, was detected; A description of the wind speed and direction when the alleged adverse effect was detected by the complainant; The date and time of the detection; The most likely cause of the discharge detected; The dissolved oxygen levels in both ponds; and If applicable, any corrective action undertaken by the Consent Holder to remedy or mitigate the adverse environmental effect detected by the Complainant. The Consent Holder advise the Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council’s Consents Monitoring Team within 24 hours of any complaints relating to air discharges being received. A copy of information recorded in the complaints register shall be included in the Annual Environmental Report required by condition Error! Reference source not found. of the General Conditions. The Annual Environmental Report shall be provided to the Regulatory Manager by 31 October of each year. The permit holder shall continuously monitor Dissolved Oxygen in the wastewater storage ponds and ensure that the Dissolved Oxygen measurement is at or above 0.5 mg/L. In the event that any dissolved oxygen measurement is less than 0.5 mg/L, the consent holder shall take appropriate action to raise the dissolved oxygen as necessary to avoid the occurrence of an incident likely to cause non-compliance with condition 22. The consent holder shall advise the Consents Monitoring Team at least fourteen (14) days prior to undertaking any pond desludging works. The consent holder shall include as part of this advice, notice to the Regional Council of the method or methods proposed for sludge removal, the likely duration of the activity and the methods that will be used to manage the discharge of odour that has the potential to cause non-compliance with condition 22.
The concentration of total suspended solids shall not exceed 10 g/m3 in more than 8 out of 12 consecutive samples, and no more than 30 g/m3 in more than 2 out of 12 consecutive samples. ADVICE NOTE: Compliance shall be based on grab samples taken immediately downstream of the UV treatment plant. (NH4-N) shall not exceed 10 g/m3 in more than 8 out of 12 consecutive samples, and no more than 15 g/m3 in more than 2 out of 12 consecutive samples; The of soluble BOD5 (sCBOD5) shall not exceed 5 g/ m3 in more than 8 out of 12 consecutive samples; and no more than 8 g/m3 in more than 2 out of 12 consecutive samples The of suspended solids shall not exceed 15 g/m3 in more than 8 out of 12 consecutive samples, and no more than 30 g/m3 in more than 2 out of 12 consecutive samples. 6 of Mr Crawford evidence
than 2 out of 12 consecutive samples. ADVICE NOTE: Compliance with condition 4 will be based on the flow at the “Mangatainoka at Pahiatua Town Bridge” flow recording station is less than 23,337 l/s. Compliance shall be based on grab samples taken immediately downstream of the UV treatment plant. By 1 July 2018, all wastewater discharge into the Mangatainoka River shall pass through the primary screening unit, the oxidation ponds, the UV disinfection unit, the wetland complex and discharge via the unlined wetland section. By 1 July 2019, all wastewater discharge into the Mangatainoka River shall pass through the primary screening unit, the oxidation ponds, the UV disinfection unit, the wetland complex and discharge via the unlined wetland section. Date may be able to be bought back but depends on when wetland can be constructed and planted. The UV disinfection unit shall be equipped with a UV sensor to monitor UV transmission or intensity through the wastewater during operation. The UV disinfection unit shall be equipped with a UV sensor to monitor the applied UV dose. The UV sensor shall be monitored continuously, and at a minimum operating intensity of 30 mJ/cm2 with an alarm notifying the consent holder if the applied UV intensity is operating ineffectively. The UV sensor shall be monitored continuously, and shall be programmed with an alarm notifying the consent holder if the applied UV dose decreases below the Alternative condition on advise of Mr Crawford