zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
TYPICAL WATER INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION METHODOLOGY PHASES PLANNING HANDOVER FOR IMPLEMENTATION IMPLEMENTATION HANDOVER FOR OPERATIONS OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE Need assessment & reconnaissance investigation Pre-feasibility investigation Feasibility investigation Project preparation Tender design & documentation Detail design & construction Commissioning Assessment & close out BUSINESS definition report Pre-feasibility report Feasibility report Funding strategy framework Loan agreement (for off budget) Financing reviews Financing reviews Business close out report PUBLIC RELATIONS - - External stakeholder list Public relations (PR) plan Execution as per PR plan Execution as per PR plan Execution as per PR plan Public relations close out report ENGINEERING Reconnaissance report Viable option packages Preliminary design package Engineering plan Tender design package Ready for commissioning (RFC) Ready for operation (RFO) Engineering close out report ENVIRONMENT Environmental issues and fatal flaws Environmental Affairs registration Record of decision (ROD) Environmental plan Final Environmental plan Execution as per Environmental plan Execution as per Environmental plan Environmental close out report HEALTH AND SAFETY - - - Health and Safety Impact Assessment Health and Safety specifications Health and Safety file Health and Safety archive Health and Safety close out report PROJECT MANAGEMENT Project charter Project implementation plan (PIP) Execution as per PIP Execution as per PIP Execution as per PIP Project close out report RESPONSIBILITY INTEGRATED PLANNING IMPLEMENTER IMPLEMENTER OPERATOR OFF BUDGET CO-FUNDED
School name (insert name of school) Project (insert name of project) Grant project number (insert grant number issued by the Environmental Trust) Objectives List the objectives you outlined in your original application (Question C2). Outcomes expected List the outcomes you expected to achieve. Outcomes achieved and project activities To what extent did you achieve the outcomes you wanted? Describe how the activities helped you to achieve those outcomes, and how progress was measured. What was successful and what was not? Comments Explain any changes to the project outcomes and activities. What still needs to be completed? What are your future plans to build on project outcomes?
5) Please check the table below. The following criteria must be met to be considered to have immunity from these diseases. Disease Inspection Method Criterion Measles EIA HI NT, CF PA 4.0 1:8 Rubella EIA HI 4.0 Mumps EIA HI NT, CF 4.0 1:8 Varicella EIA FA CF IAHA Intradermal Skin Test 4.0 1:8 1:8 Positive I certify that the immunization data given above are accurate and that this immunization status is thus up-to-date. Physician’s name (in block capitals) Physician’s signature CONSULTANT MEDICAL GASTROENTEROLOGIST Name of clinic Date Address 2/2 University of Tsukuba Hospital
Action Note from Board Meeting 1 June 2017 Number Minute Item Action Required By Date Required Action Taken 1 Draft North Local Fire and Rescue Plan for North Ayrshire Contribute to North Ayrshire Local Fire and Rescue Plan review and consultation All Partners 2 July 2017 2 North Ayrshire Welfare Reform Working Group Present a report on the Better Off Ayrshire financial inclusion programme to the Board in September Greig Robson 21 Sept 2017 3 North Ayrshire Welfare Reform Working Group Cascade training offer to all TSI staff Jim Nichols 1 July 2017 4 Locality Partnership Update Updates on Participatory Budgeting to be brought back to the Board. Audrey Sutton 21 Sept 2017 5 Locality Partnership Update Presentation given at recent HMIE visit to be given to a future CPP Board meeting. Audrey Sutton 21 Sept 2017 6 Social Impact Pledges Agreed social impact pledges to be sent to Communities Channel Scotland Morna Rae 9 June 2017 Completed
7 Social Impact Pledges Update on progress on social impact pledges to be brought to Board Morna Rae 30 Nov 2017 8 Local Outcome Improvement Plan Consultation on draft LOIP to be undertaken and results given to CPP Board. Morna Rae 21 Sept 2017 9 Local Outcome Improvement Plan Discussion on performance indicators with Police Scotland Morna Rae 21 Sept 2017
NW Area Committee Meeting Agenda 7 June 2017 Kootenai County Complex 451 Government Way, Coeur d’Alene, ID 83816 Webinar and Call In information at end of agenda 0800 – 0815 Safety Briefing, Introductions, Opening Remarks — Jeff Rylee, ID Office of Emergency Management, Capt Linda Sturgis, USCG Sector Puget Sound, Captain Timmons, USCG Sector Columbia River, Calvin Terada, EPA 0815 – 0835 NW Area Committee and NW Area Contingency Plan Overview - Elizabeth Petras, USCG D-13 0835 – 0900 Task Force and Joint Response Team Brief Outs – Elizabeth Petras, USCG D-13 0900 – 0940 Community Air Monitoring (CAM) – progress report on proposed milestones and CAM plan template – Mike Boykin, EPA and Dave Byers, WA Dept. of Ecology 0940 – 1000 BREAK 1000 – 1100 Open Forum: Local Responder Concerns 1100 – 1130 Updated Pend Oreille GRP – Dan Haley, IDEQ 1130 – 1200 ID Flooding and Hazardous Materials – Jeff Rylee, IOEM 1200 - 1300 LUNCH 1300 - 1330 In Situ Burn Technical Session - Sonja Larson, WA Dept. of Ecology 1330 – 1415 OSC Reports: Part I IDEQ, IOEM, ODEQ, Ecology 1415 - 1430 1430 – 1545 Serving disadvantaged communities during responses, Janine Wilson, Panhandle Health District Group Discussion: How does your agency approach disadvantaged communities? Goal is to compile a list of agencies with personnel or effective strategies for this work. 1545 – 1630 OSC Reports: Part II EPA, CG SPS, CG SCR 1630 Closing Comments
Annex 2: Form templates Education settings may wish to use or the forms listed below according to their particular policies on supporting learners with healthcare needs. Form 1 ‒ Contacting emergency services Form 2 ‒ Parental agreement for education setting to administer medicine Form 3 ‒ Headteacher/head of setting agreement to administer medicine Form 4 ‒ Record of medicine stored for and administered to an individual learner Form 5 ‒ Record of medicines administered to all learners ‒ by date Form 6 ‒ Request for learner to carry/administer their own medicine Form 7 ‒ Staff training record ‒ administration of medicines Form 8 ‒ Medication/healthcare incident report These forms are downloadable as Word documents from to enable schools or settings to personalise them.
Modelling and Linking Guide (MLG) Recommendations for the application of W3C Linked Data (LD) and Semantic Web (SW) concepts and technologies in the AEC/FM industry sector bSI Technical Room Linked Data Working Group (LDWG) Version: 8. June 2017 Editor Michel – TNO (NL) Contributors Ana Roxin – uB (FR) Hans Schevers – BuildingBits (NL) Lars WikStröm – Triona (SE) Sander Stolk – Semmtech (NL) David Price – TopQuadrant Ltd. (UK) Pieter Pauwels – UG (BE) Beetz – TU/e (NL) Törmä – Aalto University (FI) Bonsma – RDF (BG) Leif Granholm – Trimble (FI) Eilif Hjelseth – HiOA (NO)
Volunteer Lay Reviewer for Healthcare Inspectorate (HIW) We need Volunteer Lay Reviewers from a range of backgrounds from all over Wales. We particularly welcome applications from people with disabilities, people from ethnic minority communities and young people who are currently under-represented. Volunteer Lay Reviewers are important members of the HIW review teams and bring their values and life experience into the work of HIW. Their objective assessment helps us to highlight concerns for healthcare providers, to consider, address and subsequently improve the care that patients receive. We provide an induction/training day for all new volunteers which will provide you with an overview of the work of HIW. During this day you will find out more detail about your role and what is required of you when you take part in an inspection/investigation. You will also have an opportunity to meet some of the HIW team. All successful applicants will be required to undertake a Disclosure and Barring Services (DBS) check. Do you want to make a difference? If you want to help us to improve patient safety, ensure that the quality of experience each patient receives is maximised and you have the following qualities then you be who we are looking for. good communication skills, both verbal and written honest and open approach non judgemental, non biased good team player good observation skills awareness and commitment to equality and diversity keen willingness to work to the values of HIW be able to concentrate in a busy environment as inspection and review visits can be intensive How will this role help you? By taking part in our inspections and reviews you will have a chance to learn more about the way health services work. Inspection and review helps to highlight areas of good practice which can be shared. You will be part of this and will be helping to improve the quality of services in Wales. When you take part in an inspection you will receive verbal and written feedback from your Inspection Manager. You will have the opportunity to increase your confidence and build on the following skills: communication skills, both verbal and written
Contact us If you wish to be considered for this role, please complete the application form and return it to If you demonstrate that you have the skills we are looking for you will be invited to attend an assesment/training day where your observation, communication and written skills will be tested. If you wish to speak to someone about this role please contact us at or alternatively ring 0300 062 8163 and ask to speak to a member of the Corporate Intelligence and Development Team.
Principal Investigator(s) PI-2…………………………………… ………………………………….. …………… Name Signature Date PI-3…………………………………… ………………………………….. …………… Name Signature Date PI-4…………………………………… ………………………………….. …………… Name Signature Date PI-5…………………………………… ………………………………….. …………… Name Signature Date Associate Investigator(s) AI-1……………………………………. ………………………………….. …………… Name Signature Date AI-2…………………………………… ………………………………….. …………… Name Signature Date AI-3…………………………………… ………………………………….. …………… Name Signature Date AI-4…………………………………… ………………………………….. …………… Name Signature Date AI-5…………………………………… ………………………………….. …………… Name Signature Date AI-6…………………………………… ………………………………….. …………… Name Signature Date AI-7…………………………………… ………………………………….. …………… Name Signature Date AI-8…………………………………… ………………………………….. …………… Name Signature Date Head of Department Signoff I/we certify that:
FOREIGN AND/OR RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL VISITS – 5 YEAR PLAN In addition to the annual trips outlined in the College’s Key Dates for Parents 2017/2018, the following 4 year plan is designed to give parents an early view of the additional trips that are available to their children while they are at Penryn College. Every parent has an opportunity to save towards a trip using the ParentPay system and can log in at any time and make a deposit to their Parent Account. Obviously not all trips are open to all students as the trips in Years 10 and 11 are predominantly aimed at those students studying those specific subjects at GCSE level. If in doubt about your child’s eligibility or the financing of school trips, please contact who will be pleased to help. There are some other trips which are designed to develop Leadership skills which will involve an element of parental contribution and/or fundraising. Individual students will be informed of these once they apply to join the programmes. The indicative costs below are based on the 2017/2018 costs plus 5% per annum. The college reserves the right to change or amend visits and will refund parents if they have saved towards a particular trip which is no longer running. Visits Programme 2017/2018 YEAR GROUP DESTINATION INDICATIVE (£) Autumn Term Year 11 Drama Trip London 335 Spring Term Year 11 History Trip to Germany 475 Year 10/11 Geography Trip to the Italy 740 Year 8/9/10 Football Trip to Spain 800 All Years Ski Trip to France/Italy 920 Summer Term Year 9 French exchange students visit France 370 Year 7 Isles of Scilly Trip 190 Year 8 French Adventure 790 2018/2019 YEAR GROUP DESTINATION INDICATIVE COSTS (£)
The Authority is of the view that a National Energy Savings Scheme should be implemented as a Commonwealth measure to on, and eventually replace, existing state ‘white certificate’ schemes. The Authority is of the view that the Commonwealth Government should also consider allowing retailers or generators with obligations under an Emissions Intensity Scheme or Low Emissions Target to meet their obligations with National Energy Savings Scheme certificates to further lower compliance costs and reduce electricity prices. The Authority supports the timely implementation of reforms arising from AEMC and the Australian Energy Market Operator work on developing a of future system security services to increase system strength including inertia and fast frequency response emergency control schemes. The Authority encourages COAG Energy Ministers to maintain their commitment to cost reflective network pricing and to pursue tariff arrangements that allow national electricity market consumers to readily exercise the ‘power of choice’. The Authority recommends that the Australian Energy Regulator work with key stakeholder groups like Energy Consumers Australia to improve the process for energy consumers to access energy data and share it with service providers. The Authority considers that the needs of Australian electricity consumers would be better represented in the governance arrangements of electricity rule makers and market operators if individuals with commercial, retail expertise (beyond the electricity sector) are appointed to AEMC and Australian Energy Market Operator boards through a merit based process. The Authority encourages the Australian Energy Regulator to accelerate work to develop a new demand management incentive scheme and innovation allowance mechanism with the aim of putting these arrangements in place as quickly as possible. The Authority supports calls for better access to data related to distributed energy resources for planning and operational purposes. The Authority supports the AEMC work on a rule change request to reduce the time interval for settlement in the wholesale electricity market from 30 minutes to five minutes. The Authority recommends that the Productivity Commission review the Australian Energy Regulator demand management incentive scheme for distribution businesses, the new requirements on distribution networks for cost reflective pricing, data portability and new competition arrangements for smart meters once they have been in operation for a period of time to test if they are working effectively. The Authority recommends that the Commonwealth Government and the Australian Renewable Energy Agency consider extending the South Australian based of sub-regional power
Criteria % of Score Scientific Quality 40 Significance, Originality, and Clinical Impact 20 Track Records of Investigators Relative to Opportunity and Research Infrastructure 20 Strength of the Collaboration 20 Scientific Quality Applicants should clearly define and justify the following in relation to the scientific quality of the project, as evidenced by a proposal that: has clearly stated aims and hypotheses (if appropriate) has study objectives that align with the strategic objectives of the funding organisations (see strategic objectives at Gold Coast Health and Gold Coast Hospital Foundation ) provides a comprehensive and cohesive background/literature review that includes what the problem is and what the gap in the literature is has a clear research plan that has considered: study design (including rationale and feasibility for using this design) sample (including sample size/power estimate, as appropriate) study setting data collection (including data sources, variables of interest, process of data collection) data analysis strategy staff required (investigators and other personnel) to complete the study including their expertise resources (e.g. equipment) required that are not available as part of standard practice outlines ethical considerations (consider participants, staff and organisation) has a clear timeline that identifies key milestones has a considered and comprehensive budget that is feasible and aligns with the proposed research. Significance, Originality, and Clinical Impact Applicants should clearly define and justify the following in relation to the significance and originality of the project: How the proposed research addresses a significant health relevant to the population serviced by Gold Coast Health
Consumer PCA FI PCM Enhance control by simplifying time management Greater visibility into approved and remaining PA hours Easy monitoring of PCA hours Assure services are received Helpful real-time notifications regarding regular and overtime Reduce paperwork Improve time management and planning Simplify overtime compliance across all consumers served More accurate travel time and sick time calculation Reduce paperwork Reduce financial risk and easier reconciliation Simplify administrative work Reduce paperwork Faster identification of consumers who are not receiving services Improves details about consumers who may benefit from additional FST Extra resource to assist consumers in managing their PCA services
3.39 Ṋetshifhire of Tshifhire 3.40 Ṋemukula of Mukula 3.41 Ṋevari of Vari 3.42 Ṋevhulorwa of Vhulorwa 3.43 Ṋemudzivhaḓi of Mudzivhaḓi 3.44 Ṋetshidzaṱi of Tshidzaṱi 3.45 Ṋevuu of Vuu 3.46 Ṋemakonde of Makonde 3.47 Ramphabana of Ha-Ramphabana 3.48 Ṋekhavhambe of Khavhambe 3.49 Sikhwetha of Ha-Sikhwetha 3.50 Ṋemadavhila of Madavhila 3.51 Ṋephawe of Gandwani 3.52 Ṋephawe of Mabeani 3.53 Ṋephawe of Nḓevhe 3.54 Ṋemuṱuḓi of Muṱuḓi 3.55 Ṋetshianane of Tshianane 3.56 Ṋemafhohoni of Mafhohoni 3.57 Ramashia of Muḓunungu 3.58 Ṋemufulwi of Mufulwi 3.59 Kharivhe Ṋeṱanḓa of Ṱanḓa 3.60 Mmbubana Ṋetshitomboni of Tshitomboni 3.61 Mugwabana of Ha-Mugwabana [Nzhelele] 3.62 Ṋetshipise of Tshipise [Kwanzhe,Dambale] 3.63 Ṋetshiṱuni of Tshiṱuni 3.64 Ṋtshiilavulu of Tshiilavulu 3.65 Ṋetshivhambe of Tshivhambe 3.66 Ṋemalili of Malili 3.67 Ṋemahunguni of Mahunguni 4. Vha-Dau Royal Leaders 4.1 Ṋethenzheni of Thenzheni 4.2 Ṋemaunguhwi of Maunguhwi 4.3 Ṋemaangani of Maangani 4.4 Ṋetshiheni of Tshiheni 4.5 Ṋengome of Ngome 4.6 Ṋekhubvi of Khubvi 4.7 Ṋempheni of Mpheni 4.8 Ṋetshiṱungulu ofTshiṱungulu 4.9 Ṋelurangwe of Lurangwe 4.10 Ṋekhwevha of Khwevha 4.11 Ṋedzingahe of Dzingahe 4.12 Ṋevhulamba of Vhulamba
15. Vha-Leya Royal Leaders 15.1Tshiṱaka-Muleya of Ha-Muleya 15.2 Ṋegondeni of Gondeni 15.3 Ṋedzamba of Dzamba 15.4 Makhwathana of ha-Makhwathana [Ha-Mavhunga] 16. Vhalovhedzi Royal Leaders 16.1 Ṋemaheni of Maheni [Mafikeng] 16.2 Ralushai-Musehane of Vhulovhedzi [Bolobedu] 16.3 Ṋetshiṱotsheni of Tshiṱotsheni 17. Mahosi in Venḓa 17.1 Ṋemuṱavhanani of Muṱavhanani 17.2 Ṋetshixwadza of Tshixwadza 17.3 Ṋemalinge of Malinge 17.4 Ṋemutangwa of Mutangwa 17.5 Ṋemaṱangari of Maṱangari 17.6 Ṋemaraxwe of Maraxwe 17.7 Ṋemuhuyu of Muhuyu 17.8 Ṋetshamutshedzi of Tshamutshedzi 17.9 Ṋemangondi of Mangondi 17.10 Ṋeṅweli of Ṅweli 17.11 Ṋemulangwane of Mulangwane 17.12 Ṋembaleni of Mbaleni 17.13 Ṋetshififi of Tshififi 1714 Ṋevuvha of 17.15 Ṋemutshenzheni of Mutshenzheni 17.16 Ṋetshamulangwe of Tshamulangwe 17.17 Ṋetswinga of Tswinga 17.18 Ṋemutsheṱoni of Mutsheṱoni 17.19 Ṋemaholoni of Maholoni 17.20 Ṋetshandama of Tshandama 17.21 Ṋevhuranga of Vhuranga 17.22 Ṋematshavhawe of Matshavhawe 17.23 Ṋegumela of Gumela 17.24 Tshikambe of Ha-Tshikambe 17.25 Ṋetshapasha of Tshapasha 17.26 Ṋedzaṱa of Dzaṱa 17.29 Ṋetshianzwane of Tshianzwane 17.30 Ṋeṱonzwi of Ṱonzwi 17.31 Ṋetshiloṅwe of Tshiloṅwe 17.32 Ṋephembani of Phembani
[ ] Mixed [ ] I prefer not to say 9. Personal details [ ] Please tick here if you are content for us (as the appointing Department) to retain your CV and contact details and to share these with the Centre for Public Appointments in the Cabinet Office. Your details will be kept on file and you may be contacted about other opportunities that may arise in the future. All information will be handled in accordance with the Data Protection Act 1998. Appendix E GUARANTEED INTERVIEW SCHEME REQUEST FORM - PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES OUR POLICY We are committed to actively encouraging applications from people with disabilities. Applicants with a disability are guaranteed an interview if they meet the minimum criteria for the appointment. The person specification gives you the minimum criteria. Declaring a disability for the purposes of a guaranteed interview is your decision and is entirely voluntary. Definition of a disability The Equality Act 2010 (EA) generally defines a disabled person as: someone who has a mental or physical impairment that has a substantial and long-term adverse effect on the person’s ability to out normal day-to-day activities. Please tick, if appropriate: I consider that I have a disability under the Equality Act 2010 and I would like to apply for a guaranteed interview, providing I meet the minimum criteria for the appointment as assessed by the panel. Whether you choose to apply under the Guaranteed Interview Scheme or not you can still ask us to make particular arrangements for you when attending an interview. You can also contact us if you want to discuss the criteria for the role or have questions regarding your application. Name: Address: Date:
People with disability, their families and carers should have help to understand how to be healthier and have a good life. How will we make changes? To make the changes it is important to talk to people with disability what they need. Health and disability organisations should also talk to each other to make sure they work together. Information Health and disability service organisations might ask you for information. This is to get better at helping people with disability. You only have to tell them information that you are to share. You can say no.
Each utility must remediate its facilities that pose a safety hazard and/or do not conform to GO 95 requirements. Upon completion of a corrective action, the utility’s records must show the nature of the work performed, the date(s) the work was performed, and the identity of persons performing the work. These records must be preserved for at least ten years and made available to Commission staff. Every utility must have an auditable maintenance program for its overhead facilities that includes a timeline for corrective actions following the identification of safety hazards or non-conformances with GO 95. The auditable maintenance program must prioritize corrective actions consistent with the following priority levels.
7.1 General 7.1.1 Does the certification body operate one or more certification scheme(s) covering its certification activities? 7.1.2 Are the requirements against which the products of a client are evaluated contained in specified standards and other normative documents? 7.1.3 If explanations are required as to the application of these documents (see 7.1.2) for a specific certification scheme, how are they formulated by relevant and impartial persons or committees possessing the necessary technical competence, and made available by the certification body upon request? 7.2 Application For application, does the certification body obtain all the necessary information to complete the certification process according to the relevant certification scheme? (product(s), standard(s), client information – location, facilities, resources, etc) 7.3 Application Review
approval of project applications by Communications Division (CD) staff, and quarterly deadlines for applications beginning January 15, 2015 through October 1, 2016. Key provisions of the decision relevant to this Resolution include: The Commission authorized the CD to review and approve applications through expedited review that meet all of the expedited review criteria. Applications not meeting the expedited review criteria may still be considered for a grant but it must go through the traditional Commission Resolution approval process. Grants can be awarded to finance up to 100 percent of the installation costs (inside wiring and equipment), but not maintenance or operation costs. Grantees must maintain and operate the network for five years after receiving Commission funding. The proposed network should be capable of offering residents Internet service speeds of at least 6 megabits per second (mbps) downstream and 1.5 mbps upstream with a minimum download speed of 1.5 mbps during average peak utilization periods. On June 9, 2016, the Commission approved Resolution T-17515, authorizing CD staff to review and approve applications through expedited review for properties that are wired. III. APPLICANTS’ REQUEST On July 1, 2015, Community Housing Works (CHW), the Central Valley Coalition for Affordable Housing (CVCAH), the Housing Authority of the County of Kern (HACK), the Housing Authority of the County of Santa Barbara (HACSB), Surf Development Company (Surf) and Banneker Homes, Inc., (Banneker) submitted applications for CASF funding. On April 1, 2016, Napa Valley Community Housing (NVCH) and Peoples’ Self-Help Housing (PSHH) submitted applications for CASF funding. On July 1, 2016, EAH Housing (EAH) submitted an application for CASF funding. In total, this Resolution addresses projects from nine applicants. Applicants: All nine applicants are eligible applicants as defined in D.14-12-039. CHW has been approved by the IRS as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization for providing affordable housing since 1992. CHW has over 2,400 rental apartments in 34 communities statewide, has a less than 1% vacancy rate and a wait list of 36,000.
3 RM & TH work together to get a more detailed quote for the position paper on Harvest Strategy. Ongoing 4 BB/HH give more of an update on the Defra regional management plan work at the next meeting. At meeting 5 IFCAs & industry members send Gus a list of all of the management measures and initiatives like escape gaps and code of conduct, that is happening on these stocks that has an effect on minimising the mortality of species caught in the fishery Ongoing 6 CN gather information from steering group members are which vessels are involved. Ongoing
Your DPPA Permissible Use: Use in the Normal Course of Business Your GLBA Permissible Use: Transactions Authorized by Consumer Comprehensive Report Date: 08/25/11 Report processed by: Stratfor, Inc. 221 6TH ST AUSTIN, TX 78701 512-744-4300 Main Phone Report Legend: - Shared Address - Deceased - Probable Current Address Subject Information Name: Date of Birth: 10/xx/1984 Age: 26 SSN: issued in Florida between 1/1/1988 and 12/31/1988 AKAs Associated with Subject) Age: 26 SSN: Age: 26 SSN: Age: 26 SSN: Age: 26 SSN: Age: 26 SSN: Age: 26 SSN: Indicators Bankruptcy: No Property: No Corporate Affiliations: Yes Others Associated With Subjects SSN: (DOES NOT usually indicate any type of fraud or deception) [None Found] Collapse All Address Summary: (May 2008 - Jul 2011) (Dec 2009) (Feb 2009) (Mar 2008 - Dec 2008) (Nov 2008) (Feb 2008 - Aug 2008) (Nov 2004 - Jun 2008) (Nov 2007) (Aug 2007) (Dec 2006 - Aug 2007) (Sep 2005 - Feb 2007) (Oct 2002 - Aug 2004) Bankruptcies: [None Found]
Encourage members to fully participate in the Board, undertaking appraisals of members and making recommendations to Ministers and officials on any proposed reappointments Person Specification We are looking for someone who can support the Executive in delivering the strategic plan for PINS – improving business performance, customer service and productivity, through transforming services in particular towards digital and driving culture change in the organisation, with a particular focus on supporting Ministers’ objectives for housing supply. They must be able to form a constructive partnership with the Chief Executive and with Ministers/ DCLG/WG, and to gain the respect of the non-executive directors. We are not necessarily looking for either a qualified planner or someone with deep knowledge of planning, but for someone who brings experience of driving change/ transformation, perhaps with local authorities or the private sector. They will need to understand the accountability and scrutiny arrangements of a senior public sector role. Essential Criteria: Ability and strength of character to provide exceptional leadership skills and to encourage commitment, innovation and flexibility within the Board, within the ; Strong financial and performance management skills acumen with a track record of driving rapid change within public and/or private organisations; Political judgement and ability to work with stakeholders in and national government with an understanding of decision-making processes. Excellent communication, interpersonal and influencing skills to build credibility with all PINS staff. Ability to handle issues which may be politically, presentationally or legally sensitive. Ability to culture change, especially to support improvements in customer service. Desirable Criteria: Experience of working with national or local Government.
HR Manager (AO Mer ACF) NW RFCA Alexandra Court 28 Alexandra Drive Liverpool L17 8YE Tel: 0151 728 2048 Pamela Peers HR Manager For Chief Executive Distribution: All Association Staff – Heads of Department Council of RFCAs – COS All RFCAs – for Chief Executives HQ NW – for DCOS and SO2 Transition HQ 4 Inf Bde – for DCOS and SO2 Transition HQ 11 Sig Bde – for DCOS and SO2 Transition HQ 160 Inf Bde – for DCOS and SO2 Transition Association Board Members ACF CEOs Army Reserve Major Units in NW – for COs NRCNE – for COS External: www.facebook.com/NorthWestRFCA www.hays.co.uk
NORTH WEST OF ENGLAND AND ISLE OF MAN RESERVE FORCES’ AND CADETS’ ASSOCIATION PERSON SPECIFICATION – ADMIN OFFICER – MERSEYSIDE ACF Serial Competence Essential Desirable Evaluation Comments 1 Extensive administrative experience √ AF/I 2 Have strong IT skills, particularly Microsoft Word and Excel but with the ability to learn and use bespoke Management Information Systems (MIS) √ AF/I/PA MIS training will be provided 3 Must be able to work as part of a busy team and be flexible in your approach to work √ AF/I 4 Good communication, written, numerical and interpersonal skills √ AF/I 5 Ability to work on own inititive, prioriting work load to meet deadlines √ AF/I 6 Able to liaise and communicate effectively with external organisations and people – including adutls and children √ AF/I 7 Experience of routine office based audit √ AF/I 8 Experience of taking and recording minutes at meeting √ AF/I AF- Application Form, I – Interview, PA – Practical Assessment, E – Evidence
RACI area Activity area Responsible Accountable Consulted Informed Contract administration Mandatory Update contract database Communicate contract change Manage contract reporting Contract management Mandatory Own contract through life Ongoing management of supply Approve contract variations Contract renewals or terminations Performance delivery Mandatory Manage operational delivery Collate SLA/KPI outcomes Lead supplier performance reviews Service quality If relevant Check service quality Maintain specifications Approve alternate work methods Governance framework If relevant steering committee Define limits to procurement roles Contract Management Plan Template (CMPT) If relevant CMPT Review and approve CMPT Communicate CMPT Methodology, tools and templates Optional Develop procurement methodology Produce standard tools and templates Approve use of templates Train and communicate
Over 60% of members moving back to FFS who reported having a Care Coordinator (n=23) had met with the coordinator since moving back to FFS. Among this small number of members, the large majority (96%) were somewhat or extremely satisfied with their Care Coordinator. Slide 23 Current Care Coordination Compared to FTC - This is presented as two bar graphs in the presenter’s original PPT Members in both groups were asked to compare their current care coordination to the care coordination they received under FTC. Moved to new One Care (n=130) Comparisons by top 3 categories and bottom 2 categories Moved back to FFS (n=23) Comparisons by top 3 categories and bottom 2 categories Much better 28% three categories comprised 78% of the survey response population for this question 26% three categories comprised 83% of the survey response population for this question A little better 17% 26% About the same 33% 31% A little worse 17% These two categories comprised 22% of the survey response population for this question 13% These two categories comprised 17% of the survey response population for this question Much worse 5% 4% 78% of members moving to a new One Care plan and 83% of those moving back to FFS rated their current care coordination as “about the same” or “better” than care coordination under FTC. There was no statistically significant difference in the rating of current care coordination between those moving to a new One Care plan vs. back to FFS. Slide 24 Survey Findings: Members Transitioning from Fallon Total Care Members Service Needs and Perceptions of Current Services Compared to FTC Slide 25 Service Needs and Perceptions of Current Services Members in both groups – moved to a new One Care plan and moved back to FFS – were asked whether they use or need the following services: Medications Specialists Dental Care Mental Health Care
limited to information and approvals necessary to incorporate GHG costs and allowance proceeds into 2014 rates and to issue the first California Climate Credit. In 2 of the Consolidated Proceeding, the Commission issued Decision (D.) 1410-033, as corrected by D.14-10-055 and D.15-01-024, which adopted standard procedures for the five electric utilities to use in future applications forecasting GHG costs and allowance proceeds for inclusion in rates, and reconciling recorded GHG costs and allowance proceeds amounts with forecasts from prior years. D.14-10-033 requires PacifiCorp to file its GHG forecast and reconciliation application annually, and if applicable, as part of its ECAC application. Procedural History PacifiCorp its 2017 ECAC and GHG forecast and reconciliation application on August 1, 2016. On the same day, PacifiCorp served direct testimony and exhibits in support of its application. The Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA) filed a response on August 18, 2016 stating that it did not find any factual issues with PacifiCorp’s application. On September 28, 2016, the assigned Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) held a telephonic prehearing conference to discuss the schedule and scope of the proceeding. The Assigned Commissioner issued a Scoping Memo along with a joint ruling with the Assigned ALJ on October 6, 2016 stating, among other things, that the only evidence anticipated in this proceeding was PacifiCorp’s offering of prepared testimony and supporting exhibits into evidence. The Scoping Memo also directed ORA to file a status update and both ORA and
Appendix A PacifiCorp Application 16-08-001 Exhibit List Exhibit No. Party Date Served Witness PAC/100 Direct Testimony of Michael G. Wilding PacifiCorp 8/1/2016 M. Wilding PAC/101 California ECAC Offset/Balancing Rate Calculation PacifiCorp 8/1/2016 M. Wilding PAC/102 Net Cost Analysis— Adjusted Actual 2015 Net Power Costs PacifiCorp 8/1/2016 M. Wilding PAC/103 Net Power Cost Analysis— Adjusted Actual/Forecast 2016 Net Power Costs PacifiCorp 8/1/2016 M. Wilding PAC/104 Net Power Cost Analysis— Forecast 2017 Net Power Costs PacifiCorp 8/1/2016 M. Wilding PAC/105 2017 California-allocated Net Power Costs PacifiCorp 8/1/2016 M. Wilding PAC/106 ARB Administrative Costs (Redacted Version and Confidential Version) PacifiCorp 8/1/2016 M. Wilding PAC/200 Direct Testimony of Bruce W. Griswold (Redacted and Confidential Versions) PacifiCorp 8/1/2016 B. Griswold PAC/201 Commission Template C— Weighted Average Costs of Compliance Instruments (Redacted Version and Confidential Version) PacifiCorp 8/1/2016 B. Griswold PAC/202 Commission Template D-2 Annual GHG Emissions and Associated Compliance Obligations (Redacted Version and Confidential Version) PacifiCorp 8/1/2016 B. Griswold PAC/203 Summary of the GHG Allowance Sub-Balancing Account (Redacted Version and Confidential Version) PacifiCorp 8/1/2016 B. Griswold
SED/EIM/RNC/MDR/AGG/MLK/vdl Date of Issuance 12/02/2016 Decision 16-12-005 December 1, 2016 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of the California High-Speed Rail Authority to construct proposed high-speed tracks and grade separations at Avenue 7 (MP 180.27); Avenue 8 (MP 179.08); Avenue 9 (MP 177.94); Avenue 10 (MP 176.85); Avenue 11 (MP 175.82); and Avenue 12 HST (MP 174.81) within the County of Madera, California. Application 16-01-013 (Filed January 28, 2016) DECISION GRANTING AUTHORIZATION TO THE CALIFORNIA HIGH- SPEED RAIL AUTHORITY TO CONSTRUCT HIGH-SPEED RAIL TRACKS AND GRADE-SEPARATED HIGHWAY-RAIL CROSSINGS AT AVENUE 7 , AVENUE 8, AVENUE 9, AVENUE 10, AVENUE 11, AND AVENUE 12 HST WITHIN THE COUNTY OF MADERA Summary This decision grants the California High-Speed Rail Authority authorization to construct two at-grade high-speed rail mainline tracks and overpass grade-separated highway-rail crossings at Avenue 7, Avenue 8, Avenue 9, Avenue 10, Avenue 11, and Avenue 12 HST in unincorporated areas of Madera County. All six grade separated highway-rail crossings will be constructed over two at-grade high-speed rail tracks along the California Train System. The overpasses will be a part of the California High-Speed Train Project Construction Package 1, which is the first construction package of the California High-Speed Train System. The new grade-separated highway-rail crossings will be identified as follows:
Specific Claim:* Claimed CPUC Award ATTORNEY, EXPERT, AND ADVOCATE FEES Item Year Hours Rate $ for Rate* Total $ Hours Rate $ Total $ Onki Kwan 2014 13.5 $215 D1510047 $2902.50 13.50 215.00 $2,902.50 Onki Kwan 2015 45 $250 ALJ-308 $11,250 45.00 215.00 See D.15-10-047. $9,675.00 Onki Kwan 2016 25.9 $305 ALJ-329 $7,899.50 25.90 220.00 See Res. $5,698.00 Guy Noyes 2014 8.16 $130 D1510047 $1060.80 8.16 100.00 See Res. ALJ-303. [1] $816.00 Guy Noyes 2015 10.32 $130 D1510047 $1341.60 10.32 100.00 See Res. ALJ-308 $1,032.00 Guy 2016 5 $165 ALJ-329 $825.00 5.00 165.00 See Res. ALJ-329. $825.00 Subtotal: $25,279.40 Subtotal: $20,948.50 OTHER FEES Describe here what OTHER HOURLY FEES you are Claiming (paralegal, travel **, etc.): Item Year Rate $ for Rate* $ Hours Rate $ Onki Kwan 2015 0.5 $125 Travel time for hearings – half hourly rate $62.50 00.00 [2] 107.50 $00.00 Onki Kwan 2016 0.5 $152.5 Travel time for hearings – half hourly rate $76.25 00.00 110.00 $00.00 Guy Noyes 2015 0.5 $65 Travel time for hearings – half hourly rate $32.50 00.00 50.00 $00.00
APPENDIX A Compensation Decision Summary Information Compensation Decision: Modifies Decision? No. Contribution Lirag Public Utilities Commission - Intervenor Compensation Fund Intervenor Information Intervenor Claim Date Amount Requested Amount Awarded Multiplier? Reason Change / Disallowance Bayview/Hunters Community Legal 10/24/2016 $27,509.48 $22,403.80 No. See CPUC Disallowances and Adjustments, above. Advocate Information First Name Last Name Type Intervenor Hourly Fee Requested Year Hourly Fee Requested Hourly Fee Adopted Onki Kwan Attorney Bayview $215.00 2014 $215.00 Onki Kwan Attorney Bayview $250.00 2015 $215.00 Onki Kwan Attorney Bayview $305.00 2016 $220.00 Guy Law Student Bayview $130.00 2014 $100.00 Guy Noyes Attorney Bayview $130.00 2015 $100.00 Guy Attorney Bayview $165.00 2016 $165.00 (END APPENDIX)
ALJ//KD1/ek4 Date of Issuance 12/5/2016 Decision 16-12-020 December 1, 2016 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Southern California Edison Company (U 338E) for Authority to, Among Other Things, Increase Its Authorized Revenues for Electric Service in 2015, And to Reflect that Increase in Rates. Application 13-11-003 (Filed November 12, 2013) DECISION GRANTING COMPENSATION TO THE CENTER FOR ACCESSIBLE TECHNOLOGY FOR CONTRIBUTION TO DECISION 15-11-021 Intervenor: Center for Accessible Technology (CforAT) For contribution to Decision (D.) 15-11-021 Claimed: $10,781.00 Awarded: $7,633.50 Assigned Commissioner: Carla J. Peterman Assigned ALJ: Kevin R. Dudney PART I: PROCEDURAL ISSUES A. Brief description of Decision: Decision authorizes SCE’s General Rate Case revenue requirement for 2015-2017, including authorization for accessibility improvements consistent with agreed proposals submitted by SCE and CforAT. Intervenor must satisfy intervenor compensation requirements set forth in Pub. Util. Code §§ 1801-1812: Intervenor CPUC Verified Timely filing of notice of intent to claim compensation (NOI) (§ 1804(a)): 1. Date of Prehearing Conference (PHC): February 11, 2014 Verified 2. Other specified date for NOI: N/A 3. Date NOI filed: March 11, 2014 Verified 4. Was the NOI timely filed? Yes Showing of customer or customer-related status (§ 1802(b)):
APPENDIX Compensation Decision Summary Information Compensation Decision: D1612020 Modifies Decision? Contribution Decision(s): D1511021 Proceeding(s): A1311003 Author: ALJ Dudney Payer(s): Southern California Edison Company Intervenor Information Intervenor Claim Date Amount Requested Amount Awarded Multiplier? Reason Change/Disallowance Center for Accessible Technology January 06, 2016 $10,781.00 $7,633.50 N/A Reduction for inappropriately claimed Advocate Information First Name Last Name Type Intervenor Hourly Fee Requested Year Hourly Fee Requested Hourly Fee Adopted Melissa Kasnitz Attorney Center for Accessible Technology $440.00 2013 $440.00 Melissa Kasnitz Attorney Center for Accessible Technology $450.00 2014 $450.00 Melissa Kasnitz Attorney Center for Accessible Technology $450.00 2015 $450.00 (END OF APPENDIX)
NATIONALITY (including dual nationalities) At Birth: NATIONAL INSURANCE NUMBER: Current: NATIONALITY OF PASSPORT HELD: HOME OFFICE NUMBER (Immigration / nationality reference if appropriate): PASSPORT NUMBER: EXPIRY DATE: ISSUING AUTHORITY: FULL PERMANENT ADDRESS: POSTCODE: MONTH / YEAR MOVED IN: OTHER FULL PERMANENT ADDRESS HISTORY (covering the last five years with dates resided at and postcodes): SECURITY CLEARANCE CURRENT OR MOST RECENTLY HELD SECURITY CLEARANCE: BASELINE CTC SC DV (PLEASE TICK) EXPIRY DATE OF MOST RECENT CLEARANCE: ISSUING AUTHORITY: DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED AT INTERVIEW If called to interview you will be asked to provide original documentation to verify your identity and to assist with pre-appointment checks.
95 0994/17/CLP (Online) Mrs Jukes 52 Long Park PL21 0RP Certificate of Lawfulness of proposed use For info only 96 1226/17/TPO Yarn Hay Cottage Burns Lane 1226/17/TPO Tree Works Application 97 0849/17/HHO (no papers rec’d verbal notification. Obtained - info from portal.) Mr & Mrs P Smith 1 cottages Galpin Street PL21 0QB 98 0995/17/CLP (Online) Mrs Carys Jukes 52 Long Park PL21 0RP Lawful Development Certificate for proposed conversion of existing garage with new openings formed for windows, doors and rooflight For info only 9. Minutes of Meeting of 10th March 2017 & Notes of the Annual Parish Meeting. a) To consider approval of the minutes & notes (distributed earlier) and; b) will review/report on progress of actions (as necessary) in Appendix II Action Plan noted at previous meetings (circulated by email to councilors prior to the meeting); 10. Finance and Human Resources a) To receive the Minutes of the Finance & HR Meeting on 2nd May 2017. b) To consider the payments as listed in Appendix 1; c) To approve the End of Year Accounts (including MARS) to internal and external Audit; d) To consider approval of the following documents: i) Fixed Asset Register May 2017 & MARS Fixed Asset Register; ii) Statement of Internal Control 2017; iii) MPC Risk Management Assessment 2017; iv) MPC Financial Risk Assessment 2017; e) To approve the Annual Governance Statement 2016/17 for the Annual Return prior to internal and external Audit; f) To approve the Accounting Statements for the Annual Return prior to internal and external 11. Palm Cross Green Development - General update 12. Other bodies and committees: To consider terms of reference, constitution or responsibility of the councilor sitting on the committee and appoint members to the committees. 13. Committees and working groups: To receive brief updates from the following committees and groups (if applicable) from: Communications / Neighbourhood Plan / Maintenance / Emergency Plan / Bus Stop Working Group / Parish Office Task Group. 14. To revisit discussions on traffic calming proposals for Barracks road pursuant to the March meeting and postponed from the last meeting. 15. To consider whether MPC should take an August recess in line with SHDC, DCC and other parish councils.
CLASS II GENERAL AIR QUALITY OPERATING PERMIT FOR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION SOURCES CHANGE OF LOCATION APPROVAL COMPLETION OF OPERATIONS REPORTING FORM Completing this form will comply with the reporting requirements of the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection – Bureau of Air Pollution Control Class II General Air Quality Operating Permit For Temporary Construction Sources Change of Location Approval. Under the authority of NAC 445B.250 and NAC 445B.315(3)(h) the owner or operator shall notify the Director of the actual production and hours of operation within 30 days of the completion of the job. Failure to provide the required production report(s) shall result in disapproval of future change of location requests until the report(s) are received, and may subject the holder of the operating permit to a Notice of Alleged Violation in accordance with NAC 445B.275. Company Name Facility ID Number (A####) Permit Number (AP####-####.04) COLA Number County Where COLA is Located System or Unit # (i.e. PF1.001) System/Unit Description (i.e. Crushing and Screening, Hopper Loading, Lime Marination Plant) Throughput Rate (tons/hr) Total Throughput at this Location (tons/job) Operating Hours hrs/day Total hrs Actual Completion Date I certify that the information contained in this form is true, accurate and complete. Signature of Responsible Official Print or Type Name and Title
Stage 3 Tasks Timeframe Stage 4 Tasks Timeframe Stage 5 Tasks Timeframe Funding details Southern Cross University in-kind contribution (amount & cost centre) $ Cost Centre: Southern Cross University Cash contribution (amount & cost centre) $ Cost Centre: External Party in-kind contribution $ External Party cash contribution $ In –kind Total: Cash Total: $ $ Payment Schedule Payment No. Due Date Amount
Newport and Cwmbran Swansea South Midlands Group Birmingham Cannock Gloucester & District Leicestershire Lichfield & Tamworth Long Marston Stafford Walsall Wolverhampton Total Tickets Allocated 175 East Anglian Airborne Engrs Bedford Cambridge Colchester Luton Lowestoft & District Peterborough Total Tickets Allocated 145 North East Group Amphibious Engrs Bradford Bridlington Hartlepool Hull & District Newcastle & District Ripon & District Scarborough South Humberside Wakefield Whitby & District Total Tickets Allocated 250 North West Group Birkenhead Blackpool Chester Manchester North Wales Potteries Preston St Helens Warrington West Cumberland Total Tickets Allocated 210 North Midlands Group Chesterfield Derby & District Doncaster Nottingham Sheffield Total Tickets Allocated 100 Scotland & NI Group Aberdeen Dundee Total Tickets Allocated