Body which will accredit providers to offer the qualification. SSC NASSCOM Presently, Accreditation is not prescribed; affiliation is one of the models. Occupation(s) to the qualification gives access Engineering Analysis Proposed level of the qualification in the NSQF. 7 Notional Learning Hours 400 hours approx. (customisable as per learner background) Entry requirements / recommendations. Bachelor's Degree in Mechanical Engg./Electrical & Engg/ Aerospace Progression from the qualification. As shown in the career map (attachment sl.no. 4) Planned arrangements for RPL. - Response to market forces for RPL - RPL assessments will be the same as our normal assessments. - MOUs / Agreement in place for institutions, Retail is work in progress Formal structure of the qualification Title of unit or other component (include any identification code used) Optional Estimated size (learning hours) Level (Validate mechanical designs) Mandatory 150 7 SSC/N0703 (Create documents for knowledge sharing ) Mandatory 50 SSC/N9001 (Manage your work to meet requirements) Mandatory 50 SSC/N9002 (Work effectively with colleagues ) Mandatory 50 SSC/N9003 (Maintain a healthy, safe and secure working environment) Mandatory 25 SSC/N9004 (Provide data/information in standard formats) Mandatory 50 SSC/N9005 (Develop your knowledge, skills and competence) Mandatory 25 Please attach any document giving further detail about the structure of the qualification – eg a Curriculum or Qualification Pack. Give details of the document here: Qualification Pack (attachment Sl no. 3) SECTION 1 ASSESSMENT Name of assessment body: If will be more than one assessment body for this qualification, give details. - SSC NASSCOM is the assessment body, which affiliates assessment providers. Will the assessment body be responsible for RPL assessment? Give details of how RPL assessment for the qualification will be carried out and quality assured. Yes. It is online, objective evaluation in a highly secure and proctored environment. RPL assessments will be the same as our normal assessments. All procedures followed will be similar to the normal assessment methodology. Issuance of the qualification will be through the centralise SDMS (NSDC).
PC2. establish the design requirements and constraints 5 5 0 PC3. identify any issues with design requirements and constraints and obtain clarification from appropriate people 10 0 10 PC4. enter data into suitable analysis/validation tools to simulate design requirements and constraints 10 0 10 PC5. create different scenarios as per instructions to whether designs comply with design requirements and constraints 10 0 10 PC6. identify potential improvements to optimize designs 10 0 10 PC7. record accurately analysis/simulation/validation processes and results, standard templates 10 0 10 PC8. present results of analysis/simulation/validation processes, together with justifiable recommendations, to appropriate people 10 10 0 PC9. obtain feedback from appropriate people to finalize designs 5 5 0 PC10. communicate the required changes clearly to the design team 10 0 10 PC11. obtain advice and guidance on validating mechanical designs from appropriate people, where required 5 5 0 PC12. comply with your organization’s policies, standards, procedures and guidelines when validating mechanical designs 10 0 10 Total 100 30 70 2. SSC/N0703 (Create documents for knowledge sharing) PC1. establish with appropriate people the purpose, scope, formats and target audience for the documents 5 5 0 PC2. access existing documents, language standards, templates and documentation tools from your organization’s knowledge base 15 0 15 PC3. liaise with appropriate people to obtain and verify the information required for the documents 5 5 0 PC4. confirm the content and structure of the documents with appropriate people 10 0 10 PC5. create documents using standard templates and agreed language standards 25 0 25 PC6. review documents with appropriate people and incorporate their inputs 10 0 10 PC7. submit documents for approval by appropriate people 5 5 0 PC8. publish documents in agreed formats 5 5 0
procedures, work instructions, lessons learnt, flowchart, etc.) for sharing knowledge with internal or external stakeholders. simple mechanical design requirements such as Safety and mechanical integrity & Industry safety process different types of simple mechanical designs and how they can be used basic methods of optimizing mechanical designs different strengths of design materials and the importance of this how to use the range of analysis & simulation CAE tools, including Nastran/Patran, HM, Abaqus, ANSYS, Star CCMT, CFX, Fatigue/ Crack, NASGRO approaches to finite element analysis, including Ex CAE & CFD (Computational Dynamics) basics approaches to static analysis such as laws of statics and dynamics, concept of equilibrium, free body diagram, simple buckling theory/ beam theory & basic FEA including choice to elements approaches to dynamics and vibration such as concept of natural frequency and factors, damping/ Resonance theory, shock analysis & forced vibration analysis techniques problems that may occur with validating mechanical designs and how to address these production processes and commercial standards organization's simulation/validation process and how to use this to obtain advice and guidance on validating mechanical designs different of analysis/validation tools and how to select and use these how to check designs are compliant with requirements and constraints standard templates available and how to use to record simulation/validation results how to present your results who you may need to involve to provide feedback on your results the importance of collating feedback on your results how to analyze and use feedback to improve designs how to use Microsoft Office tools organization's guidelines and methods of communication formulation and solutions of the problems. The core & generic job skills to collecting and organising information, communication that an individual should have, will help him/her understand & manage assigned works in the context of the social environment of the customer. Individual at this job does not work under supervision, as needed at Level 3 & is responsible for his/her own learning. He/she is fully responsible for other’s work & learning (unlike not/partially as in level 4/5). He/she is also sometimes fully responsible for the output of the group. Therefore, this QP is justified to be pegged at Level 7.