zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
KS4 Options Grid 2016 Core Subjects Column A Column B Column C Column D Maths 8 periods per fortnight Sports Science GCSE Photography GCSE Art and Design (Fine Art) GCSE Photography GCSE English 8 periods per fortnight Drama GCSE Resistant Materials GCSE Media Studies GCSE Food and Nutrition GCSE Science 8 periods per fortnight Art & Design (Graphics) GCSE Media Studies GCSE Sports Science GCSE Music GCSE PE (non-examined) 3 periods per fortnight Art & Design (Textiles) GCSE Graphical Products GCSE Business GCSE Dance GCSE or BTEC RE (GCSE) 3 Periods per fortnight Business GCSE ICT GCSE Childcare GCSE Sociology GCSE *Note* All students choose one EBACC subject highlighted in blue. Students may only choose one art subject unless they are combining it with photography. Students can only choose one of the following - ICT CAM Nat, ICT GCSE or Computer Science. If you are a single or non- linguist student it is recommended that you consider taking two vocational courses. (G,E, Q, S and H) Students choosing Design Planning and Management in Construction must take this as a double option in columns B and C. Students choosing AS Philosophy must achieve at least a 6a in English with a recommendation from their teacher. Dance GCSE or BTEC Health and Social OCR National Drama BTEC Resistant Materials GCSE Sport BTEC Music BTEC Level 2 Geography GCSE Business Studies OCR Level 2 ICT Cam Nat Spanish GCSE Spanish GCSE Computer Science GCSE French GCSE History GCSE Philosophy AS History GCSE Geography GCSE Design Planning and Management in Construction City & Guilds (Level 2) Design Planning and Management in Construction City & Guilds (Level 2) EBACC subjects Vocational Subjects
8. Minimize Z = 3X1 + 2X2 Subject to:- 1. 2X1 + X2 12 2. X1 + X2 10 3. -X1 + X2 ≥ 6 4. (X1,X2 ) ≥ 0 9. Minimize Z = 600X1 + 400X2 Subject to:- 1. 3X1 + 3X2 ≥ 40 2. 3X1 + X2 ≥ 40 3. 2X1 + 5X2 ≥ 44 4. (X1,X2 ) ≥ 0 10. Minimize Z = 20X1 + 40X2 Subject to:- 1. 36X1 + 6X2 ≥ 108 2. 3X1 + 12 X2 ≥ 36 3. 20X1 + 10X2 ≥ 100 4. (X1,X2 ) ≥ 0
be held in December; Area contests in February; and Department contest is to be held before the National Certification date. The Chair shall present the Oratorical certificate and a check for $45.00 (from the Trophies and Awards budget) to the Post sponsoring the Department winner at the annual Department Convention. Section 6: This Committee shall meet at the direction of the Chair or the Department Commander. The Chair shall send a copy of the minutes of all Committee meetings to the Department Commander, Department 1st and 2nd Vice Commanders, Americanism Commission Chair and Committee members. The Americanism Commission Chair shall report for this Committee to the Department Commander and the Department Executive Committee (D.E.C.). Upon request of any two members of the Committee, the Chair shall be required to call a special meeting. A quorum of three (3) shall be required for any Committee meeting. The Chair is authorized to conduct business of the Committee meetings by telephone, email or correspondence. The Oratorical Committee Chair shall make a written report of the year’s activities, and submit it to the Americanism Commission Chair no later than forty five (45) days before the opening of the Department Convention covering the activities of this Committee for the year. The Americanism Commission Chair shall submit this report for inclusion in the Book of Reports. Section 7: Scholarships shall be provided as follows for the Department and Area Winners: 1st $2,500 2nd Place $1,800 3rd Place $1,700 4th Place $1,600 Area 1st $500.00 2nd Place $100.00 Section 8: Effective with the 1997 Department contest, winners will be allowed six (6) years, excluding time spent in military, from the time of their graduation from high school to use their scholarship. Students may use their scholarship to pay for graduate school. Department shall forward a letter to each winner outlining requirements and conditions of their scholarship. The Department will send a reminder letter to each winner one (1) year prior to the expiration date of their scholarship. Section 9: Contest facility requirements are as follows: One room in which the contest will be conducted. (A school library is not an appropriate room.) Two holding rooms large enough to seat all of the contestants and their escorts (maximum of eight people.) Rooms for contestants to prepare his/her assigned topic oration. A Post desiring to hold a Department Contest shall bid for the Contest at least one (1) year in
Eligibility: Projects must be within the Ohio River Basin. Ohio River Basin Fish Habitat Partnership (ORBFHP) funding requests typically range between $10,000 and $40,000, but larger project requests can be submitted and will be considered depending on funding levels. Federal agencies, states, tribes, tribal authorities, local governments, non-profits, for- profits, and private individuals can all apply. Match and partner contributions of 3:1 are encouraged, but others will be considered. and federal match is allowed. Post-project monitoring is required. This requirement can be met by using existing state, fed, local, or other monitoring programs. Incomplete applications will not be accepted. Applications submitted after the deadline of midnight, October 6, 2017 will not be accepted. Fund Request Restrictions: ORBFHP funding cannot be used for: Realty (e.g., lease or purchase interests in real property or to make rental or other land use incentive payments to landowners). Operation and maintenance of facilities or structures. Actions required by existing regulatory programs, except that funds may support activities under voluntary agreements that exceed regulatory requirements for conserving habitats (e.g., hydropower licensing in which the licensee enters into a voluntary agreement to restore habitat that exceeds regulatory requirements). Priority will be given to projects that address these factors in your online application: Projects in priority areas and directly related to the focus of the ORBFHP’s Strategic Plan (Appendix 1). Address conservation or restoration actions where ORBFHP signature species are present (Appendix 1). Consider watershed-scale ecological and hydrological processes that affect fish habitat and fish populations. Are part of a watershed restoration effort that works to provide permanent solutions to the root cause of habitat decline. Are integrated and aligned with other conservation plans (e.g. State Wildlife Plans, Watershed Management Plans, etc.). Evaluate actions on target habitats, ecosystem processes and fish populations over time. Leverage resources from partners. Provide benefits to broad spatial scope of aquatic resources, beyond the immediate project site (e.g. reconnects multiple miles of river) Identify measures of success and performance targets that are observable and amenable to
Cons Like Risk Level SLIPS/TRIPS/FALLS Can anyone using the plant, or in the vicinity of the plant, slip, trip or fall due to: Poor housekeeping practices allowing the build-up of waste materials or failure to immediately clean up spills could result in a slip hazard. Inappropriate placement of objects (e.g. spare material, electrical cords, bags etc.) in the immediate vicinity of the equipment may result in a trip hazard. Ensure appropriate cleaning and housekeeping practices are maintained to minimise the risk of a slip/trip/falls hazard. Uneven, slippery or steep work surfaces? Y N Poor housekeeping, e.g. spillage in the vicinity? Y N Possible Medium Obstacles being placed in the vicinity of the plant? Y N Minor Possible Medium Inappropriate or poorly maintained floor or walking surfaces (i.e. lack of a surface, unprotected holes, penetrations or gaps?) Y N If operating or maintaining plant at height can anyone slip, trip or fall due to: Use of work platforms, stairs or ladders? Y N Lack of guardrails or other suitable edge protection? Y N Other Y N Hazards Inspected Risk Assessment Description of Risk Control Measures Cons Like Risk Level FIRE AND EXPLOSION Can anyone be injured by fire? Y N
Stephen Ochromowitz – Greenwood resident –Stephen said that he thought our Department has done a great job to implement the hardware but he would like to see more done with the roads and just two weeks ago there was a huge pot hole on his road. Stephen stated that the roads need to be repaired. Jill Powers - property owner – Jill asked about the expedited process if this would apply. Dennis explained that Greenwood doesn’t fall under the expedited process. Jill said she would submit her questions to Kim. Dennis stated that they would work on her questions at the next meeting. Item 9: Set next meeting date – 1, 2018, 5:30pm at the Greenwood Town Office Subcommittee Meeting – Feb. 22, 2018, 5:30pm at the Greenwood Town Office Item 10: Adjourn - Dennis motioned and seconded to adjourn the meeting at 7:15pm. Vote: 8-0. Motion passes. Meeting is adjourned.
precipitation would affect the measurement results. Wind speeds are the ones at which the wind turbine is shown to produce the highest sound level based on vendor testing. 5. Infrasound Infrasound Level Limits No wind turbine(s) produce an infrasound pressure level, which is 6 dB higher than the background infrasound pressure level at the primary blade pass frequency and blade-pass frequency harmonics. All measurements are taken on any protected adjacent residentially used property. Measurements inside a building or residence may be performed assuming the building owner allows access. Measurement Personal Qualifications i All persons conducting sound pressure measurements to assess compliance with this standard shall be trained in the current techniques and principles of sound measurement equipment and instrumentation, and shall take such measurements under the supervision of a qualified acoustical engineer as described herein. ii A qualified acoustical engineer shall be either a degreed engineer practicing acoustical engineering for 10 years or more as long as the engineer works for a firm that is a member of the National Council of Acoustical Consultants (NCAC), a board-certified member of the Institute of Noise Control Engineering (INCE Bd. Cert.) or a licensed professional engineer (PE) with an acoustical focus. Instrumentation i Infrasound pressure level measurements shall be performed with appropriate equipment that is properly calibrated to industry standards, as described below. The microphone shall have a frequency response that is less than or equal to 0.5 hertz (i.e. an infrasonic microphone). The measurement system shall be able to collect electrical signals from the microphone and perform a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) of the signal with a frequency range of 0 to 20 hertz with a resolution of 0.1 hertz or less (≥ 200 lines). ii The instrumentation shall also be compatible to a Type 1 sound level meter. All test instrumentation shall be field calibrated with acoustic calibrator or
4 Description of intended outcome. What will be reached, not a re-statement of the objective(s). 5 Description of resources. What resources are necessary to meet the objective(s), who or what groups, what technical guidance is used, what things must be used. Total points (15 max) KSA Knowledge and Abilities of disaster/emergency management and written communication Skills 3 Good 1 Fair 0 Poor 1 Demonstrated ability to develop a solution for the stated problem. 2 Demonstrated knowledge of a phase of disaster/emergency management and activities. 3 Demonstrated knowledge of the organization and the environment in which it operates. 4 Demonstrated knowledge of legislation, regulations, plans, policies, or procedures which impact the disaster/emergency management function. 5 Demonstrated skill in written communication as evidenced by the essay that demonstrated your ability to present information in a logical, clear manner. points (15 max) Scale: 0 – Poor, 1 – Fair, 3- Good CATEGORY GOOD – met expectations FAIR – below expectations POOR –missing Design Elements The clearly contains/meets the specific design element. (3 points) The essay has some information relative to the specific design element. (1 point) The essay does not provide information addressing the specific design element. (0 points) KSA Essay demonstrates a good understanding of the KSAs. Essay includes specific details that clearly show an understanding of the KSA. (3 points) Essay demonstrates some understanding of the KSAs. Essay includes some details that show a general understanding of the KSA. (1 point) Essay does not demonstrate an understanding of the KSAs. Essay provides no information relative to the KSA. (0 points)
Fill in the year. Business entities must submit this exhibit for the lesser of the last 3 or the length of existence. Audited financial statements are preferred but owner-prepared statements will be accepted. All financial statements—audited and owner-prepared—will need to be certified by the entity with signature authority for that financial statement. Balance Sheet Aging of Accounts Receivable Aging of Notes Receivable Schedule of Pledged Assets Schedule of Marketable Securities Aging of Accounts Payable Aging of Notes and Mortgages Payable Schedule of Legal Proceedings Income and Expense Statement HUD-91126-ORCF, Financial Statement Certification Financial Statements – FY 20XX Fill in the Year. Business entities must submit this exhibit for the lesser of the last 3 years or the length of existence. Audited financial statements are preferred but owner-prepared statements will be accepted. All financial statements, audited and owner-prepared, will need to be certified by the entity with signature authority for that financial statement. Balance Sheet Aging of Accounts Receivable Aging of Notes Receivable Schedule of Pledged Assets Schedule of Marketable Securities Aging of Accounts Payable Aging of Notes and Mortgages Payable Schedule of Legal Proceedings Income and Expense Statement HUD-91126-ORCF, Financial Statement Certification Financial Statements – FY 20XX Fill in the Year. Business entities must submit this exhibit for the lesser of the last 3 years or the length of existence. Audited financial statements are preferred but owner-prepared statements will be accepted. All financial statements—audited and owner-prepared—will need to be certified by the entity with signature authority for that financial statement. Balance Sheet Aging of Accounts Receivable Aging of Notes Receivable Schedule of Pledged Assets Schedule of Marketable Securities Aging of Accounts Payable Aging of Notes and Mortgages Payable Schedule of Legal Proceedings Income and Expense Statement HUD-91126-ORCF, Financial Statement Certification Operating with HUD-91116-ORCF, Addendum to Operating Lease Memorandum of Lease HUD-91110-ORCF, Subordination, Non-Disturbance and Attornment Agreement of Operating Lease (SNDA) Required only for non-related borrowers and operators. HUD-91117-ORCF, Operator Estoppel Certificate Section 6: Parent of Operator
Firm Application Checklist Section 232(i) – Fire Safety Equipment FHA Insured Projects U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Residential Care Facilities Warning: HUD will prosecute false claims and statements. Conviction may result in criminal and/or civil penalties. (18 U.S.C. 1001, 1010, 1012; 31 U.S.C. 3729, 3802) Project Name: Project Number: SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: Send one electronic (CD, flash drive, etc.) copy of all the documents identified in the table below to the assigned OHP staff member identified by HUD in Email Blast for receipt of the Firm Application submission. OHP will email you with the instructions for sending hard copies. No. Item N/A Incl. Payment receipt – FHA Application Fee (0.4% of Mortgage Loan Amount) Payment receipt generated by Pay.gov Completed Firm Application Checklist Certification for Electronic Submittal Document Lender’s Underwriting Narrative (including applicable addenda) (Submit electronic version as a pdf and as a Word document) HUD Underwriting Forms HUD-92264-A, Supplement to Project Analysis Criterion 5, Amount Based on Debt Service Ratio Criterion 10, Amount Based on Fire Safety Equipment and Loan Closing (use sum of lines b, c and d.) Criterion 11, Amount on Deduction of Grant(s), Loan(s) and Gift(s) (use difference between a and b (1). Firm Commitment (DRAFT)* Exhibit A, Description Exhibit B, List of Required Repairs and Associated Costs (if applicable) Exhibit C, Revised Replacement Reserve Schedule (if applicable) * Please ensure that you have submitted a copy of the Firm Commitment, with all exhibits, in Microsoft Word. Lender’s Consolidated Certification Contact List Copies of any email guidance provided by HUD on this project before the submittal Waiver Requests (use form HUD-2, Request for Waiver of Housing Directive) Organizational Chart – Borrower Certification from Borrower verifying that no changes have occurred in the Borrower Entity since the closing of the initial loan.
Rodney Guy Sudbury Hydro Rod McNeil Toronto Hydro 2:15 p.m. to 3:15 p.m. Education Incident Case Study Infrastructure Technology Amalgamating Locate Program in a Municipal Environment Statistics to prevent electrical incidents while Excavating The future of Damage Prevention Augmented Reality in Damage Prevention Nancy Davidson City of Guelph Derek Whiteman City of Guelph Patrick Falzon ESA Tori Gass Toronto Hydro Kris Philpott Planview Utility Services Ltd. Ricardo Mahoney TelDig Inc. Mathieu Dupont Miralupa 3:45 p.m. to 4:45 p.m. Education Incident Case Study Infrastructure Technology Managing Volume Locates for Large Projects Making Safety Personal **this session is being held at 11 a.m. How to Effectively SUE to Reduce Delays & Disruptions Dedicated Locators Alexandra T. Grant City of Ottawa Deirdre Broude Enbridge Gas Distribution Jamie Bradburn T2 Utility Engineers Inc. John Huber Enbridge Gas Distribution Concurrent Sessions – February 9 9:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. Education Technology Infrastructure Technology Fit for Duty with the incoming legislation of marijuana – Part 1 **2-hour session LiDar for Utilities Significance of Shoring Design for Utility Damage Prevention Plan Sharing Automation: A Step Change for American Damage Prevention Response Shana French Sherrard Kuzz LLP Melissa Snider-Adler DriverCheck Inc. Clive Thurston OGCA Adam Domagalski J.D. Barnes Ltd Thomas Fiala Isherwood Geostructural Engineers Jason Manning Pelican Corp 11 a.m. to 12 p.m. Education Education Technology
Rodney Guy Sudbury Hydro Rod McNeil Toronto Hydro 2:15 p.m. to 3:15 p.m. Education Incident Case Study Infrastructure Technology Amalgamating Locate Program in a Municipal Environment Using Statistics to prevent electrical incidents while Excavating The future of Damage Prevention Augmented Reality in Damage Prevention Nancy Davidson City of Guelph Derek Whiteman City of Guelph Patrick Falzon ESA Tori Gass Toronto Hydro Kris Philpott Planview Utility Services Ltd. Ricardo Mahoney TelDig Inc. Mathieu Dupont Miralupa 3:45 p.m. to 4:45 p.m. Education Incident Case Study Infrastructure Technology Managing Volume Locates for Large Projects Making Safety Personal **this session is held at 11 a.m. How to Effectively SUE to Reduce Delays & Disruptions Dedicated Locators Alexandra T. Grant City of Ottawa Deirdre Broude Enbridge Gas Distribution Bradburn T2 Utility Engineers Inc. John Huber Enbridge Gas Distribution Concurrent Sessions – February 9 9:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. Education Technology Infrastructure Technology Fit for Duty with the incoming legislation of marijuana – Part 1 **2-hour session LiDar for Utilities Significance of Shoring Design for Utility Damage Prevention Plan Sharing Automation: A Step Change for American Damage Prevention Response Shana French Sherrard Kuzz LLP Melissa Snider-Adler DriverCheck Inc. Clive Thurston OGCA Adam Domagalski J.D. Barnes Ltd Thomas Fiala Isherwood Geostructural Engineers Jason Manning Pelican Corp 11 a.m. to 12 p.m.
2:15 p.m. to 3:15 p.m. Education Incident Case Study Infrastructure Technology Amalgamating Locate Program in a Municipal Environment Statistics to prevent electrical incidents while Excavating. The future of Damage Prevention Augmented Reality in Damage Prevention Nancy Davidson City of Guelph Derek Whiteman City of Guelph Patrick Falzon ESA Tori Gass Toronto Kris Philpott Planview Utility Services Ltd. Mathieu Dupont, Miralupa Ricardo Mahoney TelDig Inc. 3:45 p.m. to 4:45 p.m. Education Incident Case Study Infrastructure Technology Managing Volume Locates for Large Projects Making Safety Personal How to Effectively SUE to Reduce Delays & Disruptions Dedicated Locators Alexandra T. Grant City of Ottawa Deirdre Broude Enbridge Gas Distribution Jamie Bradburn T2 Utility Engineers Inc. John Huber Enbridge Gas Distribution Concurrent Sessions – February 9 9:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. Education Technology Infrastructure Technology Fit for Duty with the incoming legislation of marijuana **2-hour session LiDar for Utilities Significance of Shoring Design for Utility Damage Prevention Plan Sharing Automation: A Step Change for North American Damage Prevention Response Shana French Sherrard Kuzz LLP Melissa Snider-Adler DriverCheck Inc. Clive Thurston OGCA Adam Domagalski J.D. Barnes Ltd Thomas Fiala Isherwood Geostructural Engineers Jason Manning Pelican Corp 11 a.m. to 12 p.m. Education Education Technology Fit for Duty with the incoming legislation of marijuana By the Numbers: A look at data collected by the Managing Drilling Fluid Disposal using
Table of Contents - Bylaws Article 1 – TITLE Article 2 – MEMBERSHIP Section 1 – Availability Section 2 – Admission Section 3 – Dues Section 4 – Life Membership Section 5 – Non-Pro Status Article 3 – MEETINGS Section 1 – Annual Meeting Section 2 – Special Meetings Section 3 – Quorum Article 4 – DIRECTORS / OFFICERS Section 1 – Officers and Executive Committee Section 2 – Salaries Section 3 – Appointed Section 4 – Reporting Requirements Section 5 – Authority Section 6 – Vacancies Section 7 – Quorum Section 8 – Absenteeism Section 9 – Good Faith Article 5 – ELECTION OF OFFICERS Section 1 – Term of Office Section 2 – Nominations Section 3 – Voting Section 4 – Elections Auditor Section 5 – Voting Tie Article 6 – DUTIES OF DIRECTORS / OFFICERS Section 1 – President Section 2 – Vice-President Section 3 – Secretary Section 4 – Treasurer Section 5 – Directors Section 6 – Removal Section 7 – Vacancies Article 7 – MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS Section 1 – Signing Authorities Section 2 – Written Notice Section 3 – Waiver of Notice Section 4 – Teleconferencing Section 5 – Explanation Article 8 – ANNUAL STATEMENTS Article 9 – INDEMNIFICATION Article 10 – AMENDMENTS Article 11 – DISSOLUTION OF THE ASSOCIATION
Pattern 1 1. Stop and back up and 1/4 turn 2. Right circles 3. Left circles 4. Stop 5. 3 1/2 right spins 6. Stop 7. 3 1/2 left *Pattern 2 1. Left circles 2. Right circles 3. Stop 4. 3 1/2 left 5. Stop 6. 3 1/2 right spins 7. Stop and back up *Pattern 3 1. Right circles 2. Left circles 3. Stop 4. 3 1/2 right spins 5. Stop 6. 3 1/2 left 7. Stop and back up Pattern 4 1. Stop 2. 3 1/2 left 3. Stop 4. 3 1/2 spins 5. Stop and back up and 1/4 turn 6. circles and left circles 7. Stop Pattern 5 1. Stop and back up and 1/4 turn 2. Left circles 3. Right circles 4. Stop 5. 3 1/2 right spins 6. Stop 7. 3 1/2 left *Pattern 6 1. Right circle 2. Left circle 3. Stop 4. 2 1/2 right spins 5. Stop *Pattern 7 1. circles 2. Left circles 3. Stop 4. 3 1/2 right spins 5. Stop 6. 3 1/2 left 7. Stop and back up *Pattern 8 1. Left circles 2. Right circles 3. Stop 4. 3 1/2 left spins 5. Stop 6. 3 1/2 right spins 7. Stop and back up *Pattern 9 1. Right circles 2. Left circles 3. Stop 4. 3 1/2 left spins 5. Stop 6. 3 1/2 right spins 7. Stop and back up *Pattern 10 1. Left circles 2. Right circles 3. Stop 4. 3 1/2 left spins 5. Stop 6. 3 1/2 right spins 7. Stop and back up *Pattern 11 1. Left circles 2. Right circles 3. Stop 4. 3 1/2 left spins 5. Stop 6. 3 1/2 right spins 7. Stop and back up *Pattern 12 1. Right circles 2. Left circles 3. Stop 4. 3 1/2 left spins 5. Stop 6. 3 1/2 spins 7. Stop and back up
Investigation of potentially contaminated sites Code of Practice, and, unless otherwise agreed with the Local Planning Authority; (b) A site investigation report documenting the ground conditions of the site and incorporating chemical and gas analysis identified as appropriate by the desk study in accordance with BS10175:2001, and, unless otherwise agreed with the Local Planning Authority; (c) A detailed scheme for remedial and measures to be undertaken to avoid the risk from contaminants and/or gases when the site is developed and proposals for future maintenance and monitoring. Such a scheme shall include nomination of a competent person to oversee the implementation of the works. Reason: To minimise the risk from land contamination for public safety.’ As part of the discharge of condition for the outline application, and to support the reserved matters application for landscaping, further investigation has been carried out and additional information has been provided. This information was reviewed and the Council’s Environmental Health officers confirmed that, while some additional information was required in relation to ground gas, they were satisfied this could be addressed and dealt with under the condition imposed on the outline permission and did not impact the landscape scheme under consideration as part of this reserved matters application. An updated report has subsequently been submitted to the LPA and any further updates will be provided to Members at the Local Area Committee meeting. In brief, the following contamination assessment project works were undertaken on the 23rd June 2015, between the 2nd and 17th November 2015 and on the 14th April 2016, and comprised: 10No. windowless sampler boreholes; 10No. dynamic probes; 5No. dual purpose groundwater/gas monitoring wells; 3No. machine excavated pits; 5No cable percussive boreholes; Soil-Gas and groundwater monitoring; Geotechnical laboratory testing; Contamination laboratory testing. The depth of the holes varied between 3-20m below ground level (bgl). The following soils were identified:
dynamics, tempo, direction and articulation. Place evidence in portfolio. Unit 2 Quiz, p. 104 - EE Teacher’s Resource Kit Unit 3 Quizzes, p. 105 -107 – EE Teacher’s Resource Kit CREATE Standard 3.0 Improvising: Students will improvise melodies, variations, and accompaniments. Standard 4.0 Composing: Students will compose and arrange within specific guidelines Composition and notation of original harmony part to a given melody Improvisation of original solo Improvise a solo over a given chord progression, through the medium of a traditional ensemble. Video a performance and place in portfolio. Create an original harmony part to a that the class is learning. Place in portfolio Written assessment: Notate original B part to one of the performance pieces. observation: Original solo over chord progression in Bile ‘em Cabbage Down, EE pp. 24, #89 (Teacher Manual pp. 132) Finale or Sibelius Garage Band RESPOND Standard 6.0 Listening and Analyzing: Students will listen to, analyze, and describe Standard 7.0 Evaluating: Students will evaluate and music performances Music terminology (see above) Intonation – unison and harmony Phrase structure and form Performance with conductor direction Performance with CD or keyboard accompaniment Performance accuracy and quality Differentiate between correct and incorrect pitch and rhythm. Describe the quality of a musical performance selected criteria. Identify and explain how elements of music (e.g., color, balance, rhythm, texture) are used in similar and distinctive ways in other arts disciplines. Word wall activities with current vocabulary Aural assessment: Smart Music and Pocketrak recordings Check intonation with electronic tuner. Aural/Visual Observation: Perform ensemble pieces at varying tempi led by a conductor. Identify individual phrases in performance Smart Music Pocketrack Bloggie Instrument recordings and photos found on and
QUARTER 3 KNOWLEDGE & SKILLS ACTIVITIES/OUTCOMES ASSESSMENTS RESOURCES PERFORM: Standard 1.0 Singing: Students will sing alone and with others, a varied repertoire of music. Standard 2.0 Playing Instruments: Students will perform on instruments, alone and with others, a varied repertoire of music. Standard 5.0 Reading and Notating: Students will read and notate music. Singing Demonstrate an understanding of pitch and rhythm through singing musical examples. Vocal demonstration of short, simple melodies in major keys. Rhythm Identify, notate, and perform intermediate rhythms. Students will be able to rhythmic patterns with their meter. Teoria.com will allow the teacher to choose the number of exercises and level of difficulty and will score the students work. – time signatures Note Reading Students will understand second and second ½ positions. Students will play in the above mentioned positions with pitch and fingering accuracy. Notation of fingerings for various positions. Test students as they play exercises EE pp. 12-17 ET Teacher’s Manual pp. 27-29: Worksheet/Quiz 4 Worksheet/Quiz 5 Worksheet/Quiz 6 ET Teacher’s Manual - Higher Position Test - p. 20
Tuesday violin A-1st violins Matthew Fu Amy Egan Christina Sang Sharon Shi Katie Chan Iris Li Grace Kim Emma Smith Group B-1st violins Amy Zhang Angela Lian Dylan Kuang Matthew Tang Wang Yerin Grace Kang Dylan Phan Group C-1st violins Melanie Smith Stephanie Yu Junny Lee Ruby Murray Jochebed Shen Michael Willen Charles Yang Group D-2nd violins Isabella Heiser Hannah Alex Saadya Rao Thy Nguyen Joshua Hine Sean Agustin Group E-2nd violins Julianna Dolin Aelan Hock Quran Pilson-Savage Emma Retzlaff Denis Newell F-2nd violins Regan Skudlarek Teresa Otto Olivia Samsel Cynthia Horoho Wednesday violin/viola Group G-2nd violins Sydney McNally Holly Spletzer Anthony Chen Sudhish Reddy Jaylyn Ford Amika Chaiwongbut Abbey Thorton Group H-2nd violins Sunandita Suresh Saranya Jena Sunskriti Gupta Daniel Rochon Group I-violas Tammy Pham Daniel Claire Chang Grace Romano Sarah Kim Jason Zhao Tyler Kim Biju Natalia Parientes Group J-violas Julia Tursi Jake Lloyd Kelsey Tobin Mirabel Fizzano Jakila Ruit Group K-violas Sofia Starinieri Melinda Eglinton Prina Padmanabhan Kareena Kumar Gavin Soueidan Connor Geib Group L-violas Timothy Jeon Ethan Andorn Chetanya Mittal Jasmine Jiang Lizzie Castor Gabriella Sheldon Friday Cello/Bass/vln/pno Group M- cellos Claire Chen Christopher Spletzer Nathan Choi Bryan Kim Brandon Park Group N-cellos Emily Hall Brooke Fetterman Kylie Trankle Braedon O’Hara Steven Remish Group O-basses/vln Murphy Max Kozol Samuel Group P-basses Charlie Bordonaro Matt Schwertfeger Mackenzie Nicholson Joey Kaminetz Group Q-basses/piano Cameron Steiner Joshua Coleman Sarah Young Sung Cho Group R Make-up lesson Please see Mrs. Saul first thing in the morning if you need to rearrange your lesson time. Mrs. Saul teaches Skyview lessons until 2:00 on Monday and Thursday.
Parents / Carers’ Information Parent / Carer’s Name: Relationship to Young Person: Address: Home phone: Email: Emergency contact (1) - name: Relationship to the child: Mobile (1): Emergency contact (2) - name: Relationship to the child: Mobile (2): Child Collection
Comparison and summary of Marijuana regulations Medical Marijuana Recreational Marijuana Maximums •No statewide growing maximum •Dispensaries limited to 8 (1 per public health district) •800,000 sq. ft. of canopy statewide •40% of licenses to 3,000 or less plant canopy growers regulation allowed May only limit, regulate dispensaries Yes, may prohibit or regulate all except personal use Cultivation: Personal •Need Qualified Patient (QPat) card (may be minor) •Possess 2.5 oz prepared mj •Cultivate 6 mature plants •QPat may designate only 1 PC or grow own •Must be 21 or older •2.5 oz mj •6 flowering plants, 12 immature plants, unlimited # seedlings •must not be visible from public way •legible tag w number per plant Cultivation: Non personal Primary Caregiver(PC): •Need registration card unless household/family member •6 plants per designated QPat •2.5 oz per QPat •Max 5 Qpat, plus •Can prepare food •Excess mj can transfer to another PC without payment •Excess mj can sell to dispensary, limit 2 lbs/cal year Grower: •Need state license •Either up to 3,000 sq. ft. plant canopy or more than 3,000 sq. ft. plant canopy license •License by 10' x 10' unit blocks •Max license block is 300 (30,000 sq. ft. plant canopy) •No more than 6 licenses or more than 300 unit blocks per parcel •License may be reduced if less than 50% is cultivated Dispensary: Need registration card •6 plants, 2.5 oz per QPAT •Can grow at dispensary and 1 location •Must be nonprofit •Only for QPat, PC •Hospice or nursing facility may not cultivate
Cultivation: Related requirements •not locate within 500' of school property line •PC must have numbered tag with Qpat •Dispensary must be res •Collectives prohibited •retail mj store may be operated with cultivation facility •May only sell to licensed retail, manufacturing, other cultivation, and social clubs Security •QPat: enclosed, locked facility •PC: enclosed, locked facility •Dispensary: enclosed, locked facility •Enclosed, locked facility Testing •May not have interest in PC or dispensary • Not required •May not have interest in cultivating, manufacturing, retail, social club, or any medical mj production •Required for contaminants, TCH potency Labeling •Optional •Must test to add labeling about contaminants, potency •Sales require cultivation facility license #, batch, weight, THC potency, solvents used, serving, exp date Fees •QPat: no fee to register •PC: Annual registration fee $50-$300 •Dispensary: Annual registration •State Sales tax 10% •State Cultivation license $10-$100 per unit block •State Application fee $10-$250 Only to registered QPat, PC, dispensaries Anyone over 21 yrs old Abbreviations: QPat: Qualifying Patient mj: marijuana PC: Primary Caregiver
YOUNGSVILLE LAND USE ORDINANCE “ROYVILLE” (URBAN DISTRICT) EXISTING R-1 R-2 R-3 NB GB PR IT ID OB AG NEW R-1 N.C. 0 0 1 1 1 1 6 7 0 R-2 1 N.C. 0 0 1 2 2 4 6 0 R-3 1 1 N.C. 1 1 1 2 2 4 0 NB 1 1 0 N.C. 0 1 1 3 5 0 GB 2 1 1 0 N.C. 0 1 2 5 0 PR 2 2 0 2 2 N.C. 2 1 5 0 IT 5 4 1 3 2 1 N.C. 0 5 0 ID 8 8 6 6 6 8 6 N.C. 3 0 OB N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.C. N.A. AG 4 4 1 3 3 2 2 2 1 N.C. LEGEND R-1 Single Family Residential R-2 Low Density Multi-Family Res’l R-2 Low Density Multi-Family Res’l NB Neighborhood Business GB General Business PR and Recreation IT Institutional ID Industrial OB Obnoxious AG Agricultural N.C. No Conflict #’s Conflict N.A. Not Allowed ARCHITECTURAL CODE
Please complete and return the form to . We will send you an official Confirmation. is confirmed only if the signed Order Confirmation is returned to us. Event : Delivery Date : Delivery Venue (Let us know if there is no lift access. Additional charge may be levied) : Earliest Delivery/Setup Time Possible : Ready-to-eat Time : Collection time : Contact Person and mobile number : Total Number of Pax : Total Price : Payment Method : Menu : Classic / Plus / Premium / Vegetarian Menu Items Chosen : (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) Remarks / Special Instructions : Billing details – and mailing address :
Description Item Number Design Number (2,3,7) (5 is for Black Only) Color Size Quantity Unit Price Zip Up Hoodie (Embroidery) G18600B (Youth) $26.00 S-XL G18600 (Adult) $26.00 S-XL $28.00 2X $29.00 3X Hooded Sweatshirt (Embroidery) G18500B (Youth) $26.00 S-XL G18500 (Adult) $28.00 S-XL $29.00 2X $30.00 3X Crewneck Sweatshirt (Embroidery) G18000B (Youth) $25.00 S-XL G18000 (Adult) $25.00 S-XL $26.00 2X $27.00 3X Sweatpants (Embroidery) Red/Black Only G18200B (Youth) $16.00 S-XL G18200 $17.00 S-XL $18.00 2X $19.00 3X MELWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2017-2018 ORDER FORM PAGE #1 Description Item Number Design Number (2,3,7) (5 is for Black Only) Color Size Quantity Unit Price Total Polo Shirt Sleeve (Embroidery) G8800B (Youth) $17.00 S-XL (Adult) $19.00 S-XL $20.00 2X $21.00 3X Tour De Force Jacket (Embroidery) A7723 (Youth) $34.00 S-L A7722 (Adult) $34.00 S-XL $35.00 2X $37.00 3X A7724 (Ladies) $34.00 S-XL
very small mailer”) and that mailers in this market therefore have “widely varying costs and characteristics.” Id. at 5. The Postal Service responds by asserting that the Commission has previously recognized the definition of “product” in section 102(6) to be very Postal Service Reply Comments-Revised at 3-4. The Postal Service notes further that it routinely enters into Negotiated Service Agreements (NSAs) that combine different products into a single new product. Id. at 4. The Postal Service also argues that the Mail Classification Schedule language prescribed as part of the remedy in the complaint proceeding in Docket No. C2009-1 “created a round-trip DVD product,” and that the only difference between the product proposed by the Postal Service in this proceeding and the market dominant round-trip DVD product allegedly created by the Commission as a remedy in Docket No. C2009-1 is that the proposed product would be classified as a competitive product. Id. The Postal Service is correct in asserting that the proposed Round-Trip Mailer qualifies as a “product” under section 102(6). Section 102(6) defines “product” as “a postal service with a distinct cost or market characteristic for which a rate or rates are, or may reasonably be, applied.” The Commission has previously found “product” to be broadly defined as long as it has distinct cost or market characteristics. The Postal Service’s practice of combining products under NSAs reflects the breadth of the “product” definition. Although it disagrees with the Postal Service’s characterization of its prior action in Docket No. C2009-1 as having “created a round-trip DVD product,” the Commission recognizes that the complaint proceedings in Docket No. C2009-1 have created a “unique context” in which the Round-Trip Mailer proposal must be assessed. The Commission therefore rejects Netflix’s arguments that the proposed RoundTrip Mailer cannot qualify as a “product” section 102(6).
UPS asserts that when the Commission considers the objectives and factors of 39 U.S.C. 3622 in evaluating UPU proposals, it is giving heed to the statutory language of 39 U.S.C. 407(c)(1). Id. at 10. UPS contends that any standard or criterion established by the Commission “under” section 3622 must be consistent with section 3622 because agencies’ jurisdiction and substantive powers are limited by statute, and they can only act in conformance with their statutory mandate. Id. UPS also states that having empowered and required the Commission to craft regulations in conformance with section 3622, it is implausible that Congress would require that the Commission ignore section 3622 when evaluating UPU proposals. Id. at 11. It states that agencies must always consider their governing statutes when taking any action and must ensure that their actions are consistent with those statutes. Id. UPS contends that at a minimum, 39 U.S.C. 407(c)(1) should not be read as preventing the Commission from considering the objectives and factors of 39 U.S.C. 3622. Id. UPS asserts that 39 U.S.C. 407(c)(1) is most sensibly read as affirmatively encouraging the Commission to consider the objectives and factors. Id. FedEx agrees, in principle, with the Postal Service's assertion that the Commission’s approach to reviewing proposed UPU rates and classifications for market dominant products should closely parallel the agency's review of rates and classifications for market dominant domestic products, but disagrees with the Postal Service on the implications of this observation for the proposed rules. FedEx Reply Comments at 1. FedEx disagrees with the Postal Service's conclusion that 39 CFR parts 3010 and 3020 prohibit commenters and the Commission from considering the consistency of relevant UPU proposals with title 39 requirements other than those explicitly mentioned in 39 CFR parts 3010 and 3020. Id. at 3. It observes, for example, that 39 CFR 3010.11(c) provides that public comments may address other relevant statutory provisions and applicable Commission orders and directives. Id. Moreover, FedEx notes that the Postal Service's position that 39 CFR parts 3010 and 3020 constrain the Commission's review rests on the assumption that UPU rates are
Network PRS mail flow models have been added for machinable, non-machinable outside (NMO), and oversized parcels and now incorporate parcel volume that used to be in the discontinued RNDC PRS price categories. Id. at 2-3. These mail flow models are similar to those used for Parcel Select Ground, with the exception that they incorporate the fact that all return parcels are entered at delivery units and include additional operations to account for scanning and postage due costs specific to PRS parcels. Id. at 4-5. In addition, operations were added to or removed from the return delivery unit (RDU) PRS machinable, NMO, and oversize mail flow models to more accurately reflect the actual mail processing costs incurred by the Postal Service for these price categories. Id. at 5. Impact. The mail processing cost model is used to de-average estimated mail processing costs by shape for Parcel Select/PRS and to estimate separate costs for each price category. Given that the product-level mail processing cost by shape estimates are identical to those in Docket No. ACR2016, the mail processing unit cost estimates for some price categories increased while the mail processing unit cost estimates for other price categories decreased. Id. at 14. Full Network PRS cost estimates were added to the analysis. The Postal Service states that this change contributed to a lower Cost and Revenue Analysis (CRA) proportional adjustment factor, which normally would have resulted in lower return sectional center facility (RSCF) and RDU PRS mail processing unit cost estimates. Id. at 15. While the decreases to the RSCF mail processing unit cost estimates all exceeded 8 percent, the RDU machinable and NMO cost estimates increased over 4 percent and the RDU oversize cost estimate decreased by more than 30 percent. Id. The RDU results were caused by changes that were made to the cost models. The container loading costs were removed from the models, and postage due costs were added to the models to reflect the fact that the RDU prices now vary by weight increment. Id. A full list of impacts by price category is shown in Table 1. Id. at 18.
CHANGES TO THE MAIL CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE The following material represents a change to the Mail Classification Schedule. The Commission uses two main conventions when making changes to the Mail Classification Schedule. New text is underlined. Deleted text is struck through. Part B—Competitive Products ***** 2500 Negotiated Service Agreements ***** 2510 Outbound International ***** 2510.3 Global Expedited Package Services (GEPS) Contracts ***** 2510.3.6 Products Included in Group (Agreements) Each product is followed by a list of agreements included within that product. GEPS 7 Baseline Reference Docket Nos. MC2016-196 and CP2016-280 PRC Order No. 3542, September 27, 2016 Included Agreements ***** CP2019-11, expires November 30, 2019 *****
BACKGROUND At the same time it filed the instant Petition, the Postal Service filed a concurrent request seeking to transfer a portion of Inbound Letter Post (and inbound registered services associated with those items) to the competitive product list. The Postal Service states that it intends for the instant Petition to cover only the related products remaining on the market dominant product list upon resolution of the Transfer Request. Petition at 2, n.4. The Postal Service states that the recommendation to adopt self-declared rates for terminal dues, made by the Department of State and endorsed by the President, creates uncertainty regarding the rates going forward. See Petition at 1, nn.1, 2; 2-3. The Postal Service further notes that the Department of State’s negotiations could result in a decision to rescind withdrawal from the Universal Postal Union (UPU), but it is impossible to predict to what extent terminal dues would be self-declared or set by the UPU. Petition at 2-3. The Postal Service suggests that although the Commission’s review of the market dominant ratemaking system is pending, to the extent that a market dominant price cap currently applies or is maintained in some form, there should be an exception for generally applicable rates set by the Postal Service that are paid by foreign postal operators. Id. at 4. The Postal Service states that its requested treatment of Inbound Letter Post rates should apply whether the rates are self-declared or not. Id. at 5. PETITION The Postal Service requests that the Commission reconsider its decision in Order No. 43, in which it held that Inbound Letter Post must be classified as a market dominant product. The Postal Service states that changes in circumstances, including “a significant shift in U.S. Government policy toward Inbound Letter Post,” warrant a reconsideration of the decision to apply the market dominant price cap to inbound international products. See Petition at 5-9. The Postal Service states that the Postal
rates during subsequent contract years. Request, Attachment B at 13. Combined with sufficiently high first-year cost coverage, the contract’s price adjustments will help ensure that the contract will cover attributable costs in subsequent contract years. For these reasons, the Commission also finds that the contract should not result in competitive products as a whole being subsidized by market dominant products, in accordance with 39 U.S.C. § 3633(a)(1). Similarly, the Commission finds the contract is unlikely to prevent competitive products as a whole from contributing an appropriate share of institutional costs, consistent with 39 U.S.C. § 3633(a)(3). See also 39 C.F.R. § 3015.7(c). Accordingly, a preliminary review of the contract indicates it is consistent with section 3633(a). The Commission will review the contract’s cost coverage and the contribution of competitive products as a whole to the Postal Service’s institutional costs in the Commission’s ACD to ensure that they continue to comply with 39 U.S.C. § 3633(a). Other considerations. By its terms, the contract becomes effective two business days after the date that the Commission issues all necessary regulatory approval. Request, Attachment B at 14. The contract is scheduled to expire three years from the effective date, unless, among other things, either party terminates the contract with 30 days’ written notice to the other party or it is renewed by mutual agreement. The contract also contains a provision that allows the parties to extend the contract for two 90-day periods if a successor agreement is prepared and the Commission is notified at least seven days prior to the contract’s expiration date. Id. During the extension periods, prices will be adjusted as described in the contract. Id. The Commission finds the two potential 90-day extension periods are reasonable because: (1) prices are automatically adjusted in the extension period; and (2) the extension(s) should assist the Postal Service’s contract negotiations by providing additional flexibility.