zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Mathematical Translations Matching Five more than a number n + 6 n – 6 The square of less than six times a number Twice a number diminished by five Two third of a number is decreased by 11 Five times the sum of n and seven n + 5 Six less than a number The quotient of fifty and five more than a number 3n – 8 Seven more than one-half a number 5(n + 7) 2n – 5 (6n – 3)2 Three times a number minus eight The sum of six and a number The square root of the product of two and x. The product of the square root of two and x.
Identifying Mistakes Directions: Identify the mistake within the problem and then make the appropriate corrections. Problem Correction 2(3x – 4) + 12 – 3x = 5x + 20 6x – 8 + 12 – 3x = 5x + 20 6x – 3x – 8 + 12 = 5x + 20 3x + 4 = 5x + 20 +3x +3x 4 = 8x + 20 -20 -20 -16 = 8x -16(1/8) = 8x(1/8) -2 = x 12x – 8 – 7x = 7 – (2x + 6) 5x – 8 = 7 – 2x + 6 5x – 8 = 13 – 2x +2x +2x 7x – 8 = 13 + 8 +8 7x = 21 7 7 x = 3 and Kayla both solved the problem below. Who solved it correctly? Identify the mistake for the person who solved it incorrectly. Kayla 5x – 15 – 3x = 10 – (-3x + 20) 5x – 15 – 3x = 10 – (-3x + 20) 2x – 15 = 10 + 3x – 20 2x – 15 = 10 + 3x – 20 2x – 15 = - 10 + 3x 2x – 15 = - 10 + 3x -3x - 3x +3x + 3x -1x - 15 = -10 5x - 15 = -10 + 15 +15 +15 +15 -1x = 5 5x = 5 x = -5 x = 1
Example 1 1. Isolate the variable, y, in each inequality. 2. Graph each inequality on the same coordinate plane, using a different color for each. 3. Identify the solution set by highlighting the region on the graph. The solution to this system of inequalities is the region where the colors of shading overlap. This is the area that both inequalities have in common. This solution is “unbounded” and continues indefinitely to the right. 4. Pick a point from the solution set, and test it in the system. Example 2 1. Isolate the variable, y, in each inequality. 2. Graph each inequality on the same coordinate plane, using a different color for each. 3. Identify the solution set by highlighting the region on the graph. This system of inequalities has no solution. There is no place where the colors of shading overlap. 4. Check. Example 3 1. Graph each inequality on the same coordinate plane, using a different color for each. 2. Identify the solution set by highlighting the region on the graph The solution to this system of inequalities is the region where the colors of shading overlap.
Copy cards on cardstock, and cut apart on the dotted lines. |x + 5| ≤ 4 The set of points whose distance from −5 is less than or equal to 4 x + 5 ≥ −4 and x + 5 ≤ 4 The set of points whose distance from 5 is less than 4 |x − 5| < 4 x − 5 > −4 and x − 5 < 4 |x + 4| ≥ 5 The set of points whose distance from −4 is greater than or equal to 5 x + 4 ≤ −5 or x + 4 ≥ 5
|2x − 1| ≤ 7 The set of points whose distance from is less than or equal to 2x − 1 ≥ −7 and 2x − 1 ≤ 7 |2x + 1| ≥ 7 The set of points distance from − is greater than or equal to 2x + 1 ≤ −7 or 2x + 1 ≥ 7 |x − 2| ≤ 7 The set of points whose distance from 2 is less than or equal to 7 x − 2 ≥ −7 and x − 2 ≤ 7
Absolute Value Equations/Inequalities Graph each of the following on a number line. 1. 3 < x ≤ 5 2. 3. [0, 4) 4. x ≥ 4 and x < 7 5. x > −1 or x < 3 Solve each of the following. Graph the solution on a number line and state the solution set in notation and interval notation. 6. |x| = 5 7. |x| = 0 8. |x| ≤ 8 9. |x| ≥ 6 10. |x| ≥ −1 11. |x| ≤ 0 12. |x − 3| ≤ 5 13. |x + 3| ≤ 6 14. |x − 4| ≥ 3 15. |2x − 5| ≤ 16 Write an absolute value inequality with the given solution set. x < −5 or x > 1 17. 18. or Absolute Value Stations Review Station 1 Problems Solve and graph the following: 1. 3(x − 2) ≥ 5 2. 6 − 4x ≤ 10 3. + 5 ≤ 7
1968 2,069,258 584,000 1970 2,158,802 708,000 1972 2,282,154 845,000 1974 2,229,667 977,000 1976 2,154,807 1,083,000 1978 2,282,272 1,130,000 1980 2,406,708 1,182,000 1982 2,495,000 1,180,000 1984 2,487,000 1,155,000 1986 2,400,000 1,159,000 1988 2,389,000 1,183,000 1990 2,448,000 1,175,000 1992 2,362,000 1,215,000 Using the data in the table at right, enter the year, the total number of marriages, and the total number of divorces into a graphing utility (table). Calculate the divorce rate for each year and add that data column to your Which type of regression best fits the divorce rate data from 1960 to 1976? If the pattern continued in this way, what would be the predicted divorce rate in 1994? Which type of regression best fits the divorce rate data from 1978 to 1992? Based on the data, what would be the predicted divorce rate for 2020? Extension What do you notice the data trends? Do you find anything “odd” about this data? If so, explain. Candy Experiment
McWethy, J. (2002, April 11). Ransom arranged to rebel group. ABC News. Retrieved from http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=130394&page=1 Miller, R. (1986). Acts of International Terrorism: Government Responses and Policies. Comparative Political Studies, 19, https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414086019003004 Morris, C. (2017). “Canadian Child Hostages: The Ultimate Commodity.” Lawyers’ Rights Watch Canada, August 25. . Ottawa’s no-ransom policy doesn’t mean more Canadians won’t be kidnapped. (2016, June 13). The Globe And Mail. Retrieved from Pardy, G. (2018). Political violence and kidnapped Canadians. Ottawa, ON: Rideau Institute. Petro, M. (2009, April 29). Source: Germany and Switzerland paid ransom for kidnapped Canadian diplomats. MacLean’s. Retrieved from Potter, M. & Shephard M. (2018, February 13). The RCMP is now telling Canadian hostages’ families they won’t be prosecuted for negotiating with kidnappers. The Star. Retrieved from Quan, D. (2018, January 18), Canadian, U.S. hostages in ‘good spirits’ and kidnappers have demanded ransom: Nigerian police.” National Post. Retrieved from D. (2017, October 18). Is Trump helping to free American hostages worldwide? The New Yorker. Retrieved from Sen, S. (1989). Handling hostage situations. Police Journal, 62, 49-55. Retrieved from Shephard, M. & Potter, M. Canada does not negotiate with terrorists. Except… The Star. Retrieved from
Answer Key United States v. Kim United States v. Luna-Encinas United States v. Romaszko United States v. Thompson Language Used to Summon the Individual Voluntarily went to store, Separated from husband at door told to “shut up” Serious tone of voice in context of search, Guns drawn Supervisor required attendance, Meeting was during work at work Police identified themselves, Asked and were invited, Conversational approach Confrontation with Evidence of Guilt Not Yes Not known Showed sketch that matched him Physical Surroundings/Location In her own store, Separated from husband, Surrounded by officers Outside his own home Office of station manager Seated in his living room Duration 1+ to 3 hours 20 minutes Not known Several hours Degree of Pressure Applied (physical or otherwise) Isolated from husband and son, Told not to speak Korean, She was seated, officers standing Police in backyard with guns, Told to pull up shirts, Told to sit and stay, Told not to talk to each other At 5 times asked to leave or tried to stand, Told “No, you’re not going anywhere.” No apparent pressure Other Factors Language barrier Spanish- speaking officer on scene Anticipated job loss if didn’t cooperate Felt free to go jogging the next day Considering the Totality of the Circumstances: In Custody or Not? In custody Not in custody In custody Not in custody Discussion Starter: Analysis of the Circuit Courts' Decisions Consider and compare the decisions in U.S. v. Kim; U.S. v. Luna-Encinas; U.S. v. Romaszko; and U.S. v. Thompson. Questions 1. What factors have many of the courts looked at in determining whether a person
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)’s Advisory Committee on Medical Uses of Isotopes (ACMUI) – Pat Zanzonico (Nuclear Medicine Physicist member and Vice Chair) 2018 NIH Targeted Radiopharmaceutical Therapy Workshop – George Sgouros, Wes Yuni Dewaraja, Pat Zanzonico, Roger Howell APPENDIX – CURRENT MIRD TASK GROUPS Task Title Chair TG1 Quantitative tools for benefit/risk optimization in medical imaging Draft pamphlet to be discussed at November meetings Bolch TG2 Hybrid phantoms and skeletal models Bolch TG3 Quantitative imaging for dosimetry calculations; Pamphlet 23 is published; Pamphlet 24 on I-131 has been published; Lu-177 with the dosimetry task force of EANM has been published by JNM. TG5 Cellular and multicellular radiobiology Howell
To maintain the standards that have been set, there are some basic requirements that must be met by those interested in being a member of the Miretts Dance Team. Academic eligibility for dance team members is based on an overall grade point average of a C or higher to TRYOUT. I believe dancers are LEADERS, and leaders should represent the Miretts not only morally and artistically but also academically. There are some costs involved in being a member of the dance team. Each year, dance team members will be responsible for purchasing their uniforms and supplies. Returning dancers are responsible for replacing any items of their uniform that are damaged or worn out. There will be no monthly fees since our team is a School Sponsored team. There is a $10 fee associated with tryouts, a fee of which includes a clinic t-shirt. The fee is due upon submission of the dance team application. ALL NEW AND RETURNING DANCERS MUST TRY OUT. NO EXCEPTIONS. During tryouts, the candidates will be assessed in the following areas: interpersonal interaction, dance technique, personal dance style, overall appearance, work ethic, and effort. I look forward to the continued progress and commitment to excellence for the next school year. I welcome your child’s participation at tryouts if she is ready to work hard, be a team player, and show her Miretts Pride! Please read this packet to decide if you are ready for such an undertaking. Sincerely, Mrs. Xenia Mir-Williams Dance Team Coach/Instructor Miretts dance team tryout Eligibility information All students must meet the following eligibility requirements in order to tryout for the Miretts Dance Team: Each student must have a C grade or higher according to grades reported on the student’s LAST issued report card. You must provide a copy of last year’s report card along with your application and tryout fee. All tryout forms must be completely filled out and submitted before the deadline to be accepted. All applications and the tryout fee of $10 are due to Mrs. Xenia, Ms. America, or Ms. Foster at the main office by 3:30 on Friday, September 18th. Late applications will not be accepted under any circumstances.
“The illustration on the left is method in the OEP instruction sheet for mirror overlap. Place an object to your side. Angle a mirror 45 degrees over your eye, so that the object appears in the mirror. Stare straight ahead. Do something magical with your brain, fuse the images, and make the object appear as if it is located on the wall in front of you. Move the mirror around to make the object move around on the wall in front of you. The illustration on the right is the way that my vision therapist taught me, and the method which I prefer. Place the object in front of you. Put the mirror over one eye. Move the mirror around and make the object travel around the room.” Mirror Superimposition: Mazes Notes: Creating corners: presentation board, doors, cabinets Mirror Septum Techniques: Place locker mirror (rectangular) on a piece of paper. The mirror will act as a septum, so that one eye will see the paper directly, but will not be able to see the image on the other half of the paper. The other eye will look in the mirror to see the image is projected to the opposite side of the page. Symmetry Drawing Cheiroscopic Tracing
Name:__________________________________________ Mirror Neuron Student Data Collection Video 1 Detailed Observations: Emotions Expressed: Video 2 Detailed Observations: Emotions Expressed: 3 Detailed Observations: Emotions Expressed: Small Group Consensus: Video 1 – Emotions Expressed Video 2 – Emotions Expressed Video 3 – Emotions Expressed Mirror Neuron Student Data Collection Conclusion Questions Are there any patterns in the data on the emotions being expressed? Why would these occur?
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION GENERAL PROJECT OBJECTIVES STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS BUILDING ENDORSEMENT AND STATUTORY PLANNING APPROVAL PROCESS a) Building endorsement and statutory planning approval process Variations DOCUMENTATION a) Step Two: Submission of sketch design drawings Step Three: Submission of detailed design information Step Five: Submission of Building Licence drawings SITE MANAGEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION SITE PLANNING FOR PRECINCTS 1 TO 5 AND 9 a) Objectives for development Detailed Area Plan Other requirements ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE Mandatory items Recommended item BUILT FORM AND LANDSCAPE Architectural character and integrity Elevations Roofscape Materials and colours Outdoor living area Fences and letterbox Landscape Driveway SERVICES Services b) Stormwater c) Waste and recycling d) Storage APPENDICES PRECINCT PLAN AND DETAILED AREA PLANS Precinct Plan Sheet 1: Precinct 1, Lots 1 to 7 and Precinct 2, Lots 8 to 12 Sheet 2: Precinct 3, Lots 13 to 40 Sheet 3: Precinct 4, Lots 41 to 47 Sheet 4: Precinct 5, Lots 48 to 51
joe.davis@pentagon.af.mil Resource Manager/Advisor Contact info: William S. Cole, Resource Manager SAF/FMP Phone: 703.555.5488 Fax: 703.555.5977 william.cole@pentagon.af.mil Accounting and Finance Office Contact info: AFDW/FMA Bolling AFB, Commercial (202) 555-1234 (ATTACHMENT I continued) MIPR # SAFFMP7123G001, Continuation Page 4 Interagency Agreement A) Interagency Agreement: Acceptance and return of the DD Form 448-2 to the requiring activity constitutes an interagency agreement and the assisting agency’s agreement to terms. The assisting agency may add additional support requirements to this agreement or supplement with an agency specific agreement with the permission of the Air Force official who signed the DD Form 448. B) The assisting agency must record the applicable statutory authority on the DD Form 448-2, Block 13, Remarks. C) Advance payments or advance billings for or service orders are prohibited unless explicitly required by law. Procedure: The assisting agency must request an advance in writing to the PM, citing the statutory authority allowing the payment, before accepting the MIPR. The PM will notify the assisting agency in writing of the approval or disapproval. The assisting agency will not record the MIPR funding as an advance payment or advance billing unless specifically approved in writing by the program manager. If approved, the assisting agency must cite in Block 13, Remarks, of the DD Form 448-2: “Order Number (fill in order number) is approved for advance payment or advance billing in the amount of (fill in dollar amount) by (signature block of the Air Force official who approved the advance payment or advance billing) per specific appropriation or law (cite specific appropriation or law) authorizing the request for advance payment/advance billing.” D) The assisting agency has up to 30 days to accept this DD Form 448 package. The assisting agency will not accept the DD Form 448 until in receipt of a complete requirements package. The assisting agency will return this DD Form 448 if complete package is not received within 30 days of receipt of the DD Form 448 to the PM and include the following in Block 13, remark section of the DD Form 448-2, “Order is not accepted. Contact (insert assisting agency POC, phone number) to discuss deficiencies with the requirements package.”
Duties & Responsibilities: Conduct an assessment to determine the current situation in knowledge and information management at the PMO & MPW. Evaluating available technologies and selecting the most suitable option for using in setting up the MIS of the PMO & MPW. Setting up the system Training all the PMO and Ministry staff in using the system The overall responsibility of the MIS advisor is to provide all sorts of support that is required to establish a fully functional MIS System which at least should encompass an effective and efficient Decision Support System, Transaction Processing System, Asset Management System and Management Reporting System. The incumbent will be responsible for needs assessment, analysis, designing, establishment of the MIS as well as training the end users in using the system. The specific activities of the MIS advisor include but are not limited to the following: 1) Assess the current situation in knowledge and information management at the PMO and MPW. Assess the knowledge and information management capacity and practices of Ministry. This assessment will cover all the departments, functions, processes and programs (both current and future). Identify and recommend appropriate interventions (in addition to setting up a MIS) to address the knowledge and information management gaps 2) Evaluate available technologies and recommend the most suitable option for the Ministry Conduct a survey of all MIS technologies available for use in Afghanistan. Conduct a feasibility and cost-benefit analysis of the available MIS technologies. The assessment should take into consideration all the contextual issues related to operating such a system in Afghanistan. Recommend, with justification, the best option for use in setting an integrated MIS for the PMO/MPW. 3) Set up the MIS Facilitate the procurement and installation of the MIS. Pre-test the system before launching it Integrate into the system adequate measures for data and information access and security. Develop systems user and management manual the ICT staff on the use and management of the system. Launch the system Provide ongoing training and mentoring of ICT staff in the maintenance and troubleshooting of any emerging technical and operational issues of the system Monitor progress in use of the system and give recommendations on upgrades as may be necessary
Leadership & Governance Quality 90% of staff will be satisfied with the school’s leadership and working environment. Parent & Community Engagement, including the following measures: Parent satisfaction Parent response rate on DPS Parent Satisfaction Survey Stakeholders, students and families will love McAuliffe International School. At least 90% of students and parents will indicate satisfaction with the academic program, the teachers and the school, using a rubric of 1 to 5 (with an average of 4 or above indicating satisfaction). School-Specific Organizational Objectives 90% of all students and staff at MIS will participate in least three days of service learning each school year. Appendix E Waiver Request Template Table I – Analysis of Board Policy Waivers Called for by the Innovation Plan DPS Policy Reference Description of Policy Innovation – Proposed Replacement Policy or Practice II– Analysis of State Statutory Waivers Called for by the Innovation Plan The Innovation Act on waivers of statutes (22-32.5-108(4)) states that “each district of innovation that receives a waiver … shall specify the manner in which the innovation school … shall comply with the intent of the waived statute or rules and shall be accountable to the state for such compliance.” For each state waiver, specify how the school intends to comply with intent of the statutes being waived. State Statute Description of Statute Innovation – Proposed Replacement Policy or Practice Table III – Analysis of Collective Bargaining Agreement Waivers Called for by the Innovation Plan
1. TO WHAT DO YOU OBJECT? (Please be specific; cite pages or sections) 2. WHY DO YOU OBJECT TO THIS MATERIAL? 3. DID YOU EXAMINE ALL OF THIS MATERIAL? Yes No If you answered “NO”, please explain what parts of the material you did examine REQUEST FOR INTERPRETER Request for interpreter Yes No If you replied “Yes,” please indicate Speaker’s Native Language SIGNATURE OF PETITIONER DATE
MIS 2101 - Project 1 Business Applications Name Instructions This assignment has three major parts. Each part involves reading, interacting with some software, copying computer screen images into your assignment to demonstrate your work, and responding to questions. Grading Criteria This assignment will be graded using a total numeric score based on the accuracy of your answers. Submission of Deliverable Add your answers to this document and submit this document as a file. Answers to questions should not be longer than two to three sentences. Credit will be deducted for answers that are too long. Additionally, in an effort to save paper, please do not include the directions in your final submission. Submit your final project via hardcopy only, due by the end of class on the assigned date. NO late submissions will be accepted. The assignment is posted on the class MIS Community site. Please use the assignment template for your answers, and provide screen shots for all of the assignments when directed. To copy a screen image on your computer, press the Alt+PrtSc keys on your computer. This copies the screen to the Windows clipboard. Then go to the assignment Word document, place the mouse cursor at the point where you want to insert the screen image press and release the left mouse key select Edit/Paste PART A – Customer Relationship Management Introduction The purpose of this assignment is to learn how businesses manage relationships with existing and potential customers through a Customer Relationship Management (CRM) system. You will explore a demo of Microsoft’s CRM. Make sure you are using a computer with the volume up so you can hear what the presenter is describing. Steps Watch and listen to the Microsoft Dynamics CRM Demo:
June 6 Turning transaction data into analytical data: Overview of the Dimensional Model The structure of the Dimensional Model: The Star Schema Working with Dimensional Data: Pivot Tables in Excel exercise: Pivot Tables in Excel PowerPoint: Dimensional Data Modeling Assignment 4 Due: ETL June 8 Working with Dimensional Data: Pivot Tables in Excel Introduction to Advanced Analytics and R In-class Exercise: Descriptive Statistics Review & getting familiar with R and RStudio PowerPoint: Advanced Analytics and R Assignment 5 Due: Pivot Tables in Excel Week 5 June 13 Exam 2 Due** Analysis Scenario: Determining customer behavior based on a profile (decision trees) Analysis Scenario: Identifying similar customers (clustering and segmentation) exercise: Chi-Squared Statistics In-class exercise: Decision trees in R PowerPoint: Classification using Decision Trees PowerPoint: Clustering and Segmentation Assignment 6 Due: Intro to R June 15 Analysis Scenario: What products are purchased together? (Association In class exercise: Clustering in R PowerPoint: Association Rule Mining Assignment 7 Due: Decision Trees in R Week 6 June 20 Connecting to a MySQL Database using R In-class exercise: Computing Confidence, Support, and Lift In-class exercise: Association Rule Mining in R Assignment 8 Due: Clustering in R June 22 Exam 3 Assignment 9 Due: Association Rules
to create a personalized event schedule to create a personalized business card to capture notes about a session to send notes via email or text message Platform Support Requirements to support iDevices to support Android devices to support Windows Mobile devices to support BlackBerry devices Program Requirements to support multi-track schedules to upload documents and presentations to scan QR codes relating to program activities to search the app for content or delegate information Socialization Requirements to post photos, share photos, like photos within the Event App to download photos from the App to communicate with delegates from within the Event App to link to external websites such as Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn etc. to accept or request requests for access to delegate digital business to send tweets from within the Event App to automatically apply a custom hash tag to any tweets sent from within the Event App Sponsorship Requirements to publish and acknowledge Event App sponsorship(s) for specific sessions or tracks to be sponsored within the App to use sponsor logos within the Event App Support Requirements to provide telephone and/or support from 7 AM until 7 PM ET/EST Tradeshow Requirements
240 480 0.0160 480 960 0.0320 960 1,920 0.0640 1,920 3,840 0.128 3,840 7,680 0.256 7,680 15,360 0.512 15,360 30,720 1.02 30,720 61,440 2.05 61,440 122,880 4.10 122,880 245,760 8.19 245,760 491,520 16.4 491,520 983,040 32.8 983,040 1,966,080 65.5 1,966,080 3,932,160 131 Step 6. Check each chemical compound that has a listed TLV. If all compounds are emitted at a rate less than the allowed emission rate, then the coating passes the toxic screening test and can be used under this permit. If one or more of the chemical compounds are emitted at a rate greater than the allowed emission rate, the appropriate District Office or local air agency must be contacted to determine if the coating can be used. Monitoring and/or Recordkeeping Requirements The permittee collect and record the following information each day for the coating operations: the name and identification number of each coating applied; the VOC content (excluding water and exempt solvents) of each coating as applied, calculated in accordance with the equation specified in paragraph (B)(9) of OAC rule 3745-21-10 for CVOC,2, in pounds VOC/gallon of coating; the number of gallons of each coating applied; the VOC emissions from each coating applied, i.e., d)(1)b. times d)(1)c for each coating, in pounds of VOC/coating; the daily VOC emissions from all the coatings applied, i.e., the sum of d)(1)d. for all coatings, in pounds of VOC/day; the total number of gallons of all coatings applied; the number of hours of operation; and the daily average gallons of coating applied per hour. The coatings VOC content and usage records shall be maintained for a minimum of 3 years. [OAC 3745-21-09(B)(3)(f)] and [for OAC 3745-21-09(U)(1)(i)]
The specific operations(s), property, and/or equipment that constitute each emissions unit along with the applicable rules and/or requirements and with the applicable emissions limitations and/or control measures. Emissions from each unit shall not exceed the listed limitations, and the listed control measures shall be specified in narrative form following the table. Applicable Rules/Requirements Applicable Emissions Limitations/Control Measures a. ORC 3704.03(T) Volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions shall not exceed 11.3 tons per year from coatings and cleanup materials. b. OAC rule 3745-21-09(U)(2)(e)(i) See b)(2)a. c. OAC rule 3745-17-11(C) See d)(4) through (6). d. 40 CFR Part 63, Subparts HHHHHH and/or XXXXXX* Requirements for minimizing emissions from coating and stripping operations, capture efficiency, cleanup, storage and handling of coatings and cleanup materials, and training; and requirements for minimizing emissions from metal fabrication and finishing. * U.S. EPA's generally available control technology (GACT) and/or management practices for area source categories of HAPs, that have been implemented through the "Integrated Urban Air Toxics Strategy" (64 FR 38715) and promulgated under Section 112(d)(5) of the Clean Air Act, are regulated by the U.S.EPA. Additional and Conditions The permittee not use more than 8 gallons of coating material per day for the coating of miscellaneous metal parts. Operational Restrictions The permittee shall install, operate, and maintain a dry filtration system for the control of particulate emissions whenever this emissions unit is in operation and shall maintain the dry particulate filter in accordance with the manufacturers recommendations, instructions, and/or operating manual(s), with any modifications deemed necessary by the permittee. Prior to the use of any coating in this coating line, the permittee shall determine that the coating meets the toxic screening criteria described below. Purpose: The purpose of this test is to evaluate coatings to determine if the chemical compounds in the coatings be emitted at acceptable levels for the general permit. Data Needed: (1) MSDS for each coating to be evaluated. (2) information on the maximum coating usage rate for the line as discussed in Step 1 below.
Strip Organizer If ______________________, then ___________________. P: Q: Q: R: R: S: S: T: T: U: U: V: V: W: W: P:
Law of Detachment Law of Syllogism Law of Contrapositive Neither If P→Q and P is true than Q is true. If P→Q and Q→R then P→R. If P→Q and Q is than P is false. If P→Q and Q is true than P is true. If x is even, then x2 is even. X = 4. 42 is an even number. If a figure is a kite, then it is a quadrilateral. If a figure is a quadrilateral, then it is a polygon. If a figure is a kite, then it is a polygon. If a figure is a quadrilateral, then it has four A triangle has three sides. A triangle is not a quadrilateral. All 45-degree angles are congruent. A B A and B are 45 degrees. If a figure is a quadrilateral, then it has four sides. A rhombus is a quadrilateral. A rhombus has four sides. If a number ends in zero, it is divisible by 10. Ninety ends in zero. Ninety is divisible by 10. If two angles are vertical, then they are congruent. are not congruent. Therefore, are not vertical. If you eat too much turkey, then you will get sick. got sick. Javon ate too much turkey. If an angle is acute, then it is not obtuse. . is not obtuse. If 2 is acute, then 3 is obtuse. If 3 is obtuse, then 4 is acute. If 2 is acute, then 4 is acute. If x = 3, then it is a solution to x + 2 = 5. X = 1, so it is not a solution to x + 2 = 5. If Kim gets she gives half of it to Sid. If Sid gets money, he gives half of it to Kim. Kim and Sid share their money equally.
Date Rank Allegation Misconduct Outcome 13th Jan 2017 Constable The officer pleaded guilty to criminal allegations of breaching the Data Protection Act relating to accessing GMP intel systems, none of which were for policing purposes. Also failed to declare association with known criminals. Gross Misconduct Dismissed 30th Jan 2017 (original hearing date 29th Nov & 1st Dec 2016) Assistant Chief Constable Discreditable conduct towards another officer whilst very drunk and behaved in an unprofessional and bullying manner Misconduct Written Warning at further hearing for senior officer 14th Feb 2017 Constable The officer pleaded guilty to conspiracy to cultivate cannabis and Misconduct in Public Office Gross Misconduct Dismissed 10th March 2017 Detective Superintendent & Detective Inspector During a covert operation officers failed to make adequate to protect vulnerable children. Misconduct Not proven, found to be a performance matter for both officers 21st March 2017 Detective Sergeant Officer used a GMP covert vehicle for personal use without authority or permission. Misconduct Written Warning 27-31 March 2017 Constable Officer 1. Assaulted a male whilst on duty, he also goaded the male into a physical confrontation. officer 2. witnessed the attack but failed to intervene or respond appropriately. The witness statements submitted by both Allegation of assault and inaccurate statements was found not proven. Officer 1 given Final Written Warning in relation to the
Date Rank Allegation Misconduct Meeting or Misconduct Hearing Outcome 9th-10th Jan 2018 Constable Officer failed to deal with a domestic dispute correctly and check on the welfare of those involved and lied about speaking to the parties involved. The male at the address later overdosed and died. Gross Misconduct Hearing Allegations found Not proven 17th Jan 2018 Police Staff member accessed and disclosed GMP confidential data without a legitimate policing purpose Misconduct Hearing Summary dismissal 18th Jan 2018 Constable Without any authority to do so, the officer disclosed details of a covert Department of and Pension operation, and the vehicle being used, to third party. Gross Misconduct Hearing Officer dismissed 31st Jan 2018 Constable Officer accepted a police caution for possession of Cocaine having initially lied about the drugs being his. Gross Misconduct Hearing Officer dismissed 5th-7th Feb and 27th -28th March 2018 Constable Officer attempted to form an inappropriate relationship with a vulnerable female who subsequently reported his conduct. The officer also conducted checks of GMP systems on her that were not for policing purposes. Misconduct Hearing Officer Dismissed 23rd February 2018 Constable The officer used Inappropriate sexualised language in the work place. Misconduct Meeting Allegations found proven as Misconduct but no formal sanction imposed. 12th – 14th Feb 2018 Constable The officer attempted to steal fishing poles from a Police Station that belong to another officer. Gross Misconduct Hearing Allegations found Not proven 29th March 2019 Constable Officer failed to record a crime report for assault and take action when the victim reported that they had been assaulted. Misconduct meeting Written Warning
Date Rank Allegation Misconduct Meeting or Gross Misconduct Hearing Outcome 5th Oct 2017 Special Constable Officer was involved in a dispute over parking whilst off duty and became abusive towards a member of public and knocked mobile phone out of hand causing damage. Officer showed warrant card during dispute. Misconduct Meeting Written Warning 11th Oct 2017 Detective Constable Whilst off duty officer became involved in an altercation with a youth whom he followed home and entered his home address and grabbed hold of. Misconduct Meeting Final Written Warning 2nd Nov 2017 Police Constable The officer PNC'd a car that was causing an obstruction at a friends property and passed the details of the PNC Keeper to him. Misconduct Meeting Final Written Warning 21st-22nd Nov 2017 3 X Police Constables Allegations of excessive force following the arrest of a male and Female. Gross Misconduct Hearing Not Proven 30th Nov – 1st Dec 2017 Police Constable Officer attended the home of a female in the early hours of the morning and behaved inappropriately towards her and attempted to kiss her Gross Misconduct Hearing Final Written Warning 12th Dec 2017 Police Constable The officer was alleged to have deliberately run over the ankle of a male Misconduct Meeting Not Proven
he was chasing causing injury. 14th Dec 2017 Special Constable Officer made an homophobic comment on social media. Special Case Hearing Officer Dismissed from the service 18th-21st Dec 2017 2 X Detective Constable Both officers failed to out their duties as expected failing to leave their office for extended periods of time whilst on night duty, and gave information about what they had been doing that was inaccurate and misleading Gross Misconduct Hearing Both officers Dismissed from the service
matter was reassessed as misconduct). 21.12.15 Police Officer Confidentiality Officer accessed force IT systems for no known lawful policing purpose. The officer took photographs of images on their personal mobile telephone and forwarded these onto other persons. Misconduct Meeting – A Written Warning was issued to remain on file for 12 months. 11.02.16 Police Officer Duties and Responsibilities and Orders and Instructions Officer had on a number of occasions been late for duty. Further the officer failed to accurately complete Pocket Note Book. Misconduct Meeting – A Written Warning was issued to remain on file for 12 months. 19.02.16 Police Officer Authority, Respect and Courtesy, Duties and Responsibilities, Discreditable Conduct, Honesty and Integrity Officer improperly gained entry to a rugby club whilst on duty; failed to respond to a Grade 1 incident; failed timeously in relation to a Grade 2 incident; whilst off duty smashed a glass in a public house; denied responsibility for their actions whilst in the public house. Misconduct Hearing – Officer dismissed without notice. 08.03.16 Police Officer Duties and Responsibilities and Orders and Instructions Officer had on a number of occasions absented themselves from duty for no good reason. The officer was also involved in inappropriate email correspondence using the Force email system. Misconduct Meeting – A Written Warning was issued to remain on fie for 12 months.
GLOUCESTERSHIRE CONSTABULARY OUTCOMES OF MISCONDUCT PROCEEDINGS 2016/17 MISCONDUCT FINDINGS Date of Finding Staff Type Allegation Type* Allegations Details Outcome 19.04.16 Police Staff Discreditable Conduct A member of police staff printed large amounts of material for a colleague knowing that it was for personal use and also printed documents for their own personal use. Disciplinary Hearing – A written warning was issued. The sanction will remain live for 12 months. 19.04.16 Police Staff Discreditable Conduct A member of police staff had large amounts of material printed for them for their own personal use. Disciplinary Hearing – A written warning was issued. The sanction will remain live for 12 months. 04.05.16 Police Staff Discreditable Conduct and Confidentiality A Police Staff member formed an inappropriate relationship with a young and vulnerable female whom they met through the course of their work. They also accessed police databases without a legitimate policing purpose Disciplinary Hearing – The police staff member was dismissed without notice. 06.05.16 Police Officer Discreditable Conduct Officer drove at excessive speeds on the M5 motorway whilst conveying a prisoner. Misconduct Meeting – A written warning was issued to remain on file for 12 months. 22.07.16 Police Officer Duties and Responsibilities and Orders and Instructions Officer attended home address during duty time; absented themselves from duty; failed to patrol a designated area; failed to expeditiously conduct an investigation; involved in inappropriate email correspondence. Misconduct Meeting – A written warning was issued to remain on file for 18 months. 28.07.16 Police Officer Discreditable Conduct, Orders and Instructions and Confidentiality Officer inappropriately misused their works access to the Internet and/or other systems; officer inappropriately accessed the Police National Computer to obtain confidential information. Misconduct Hearing - The officer was dismissed. 07.10.16 Police Officer Authority, Respect and Courtesy, Equality and Diversity and Discreditable Conduct Officer was overheard by the complainant making inappropriate comments that were lacking in professionalism. The officer was using foul and derogatory language. The chair of the misconduct meeting also addressed two other allegations of incivility against the officer neither of which was proven. Misconduct Meeting – A written warning was issued to remain on file for 12 months. RESIGNATIONS DURING GROSS MISCONDUCT INVESTIGATIONS
Date of Resignation Staff Type Allegation Type* Allegations Details Outcome 13.07.16 Police Officer Confidentiality Data Protection breaches Officer gave notice to resign detailing exceptional circumstances. 21.10.16 Special Constable Honesty and Integrity Use of police vehicle for non-policing purposes Officer gave notice to resign. RETIREMENTS DURING GROSS MISCONDUCT INVESTIGATIONS Date of Retirement Staff Type Allegation Type* Allegations Details Outcome *Standards of Professional Behaviour
Action 4. (If additional space is needed, additional sheets may be attached, referencing “Charge 1, Actions __”.) Please attach any documentation or evidence of charges above, labeled according to the relevant charge (ex. “Charge 1” or “Charge 1, Action 2”). Charge of Misconduct Form Charge ___ (If additional charges are being filed, please submit copies of this page as needed, with all charges numbered sequentially.) Code rule allegedly violated (from Section B): Actions of the charged individual violating the Code provision noted above and the specific ways in which this section of the Code was violated: Action 1. Action 2. Action 3.
begun to date. . . Whatever they express they express through the style of a decade and a half—; a style she helped create. . . —She must know that now she probably would not do a trill in exactly that way,— that the whole sound, atmosphere, dramaturgy of her recordings have just slightly become of the past. . . —Is it bitter? Does her soul tell her that she was an idiot ever to think anything material wholly could satisfy?. . . —Perhaps it says: The only way to escape the History of Styles is not to have a body. * * * When I open my eyes in the morning, my great mystery stands before me . . . —I know that I am intelligent; therefore the inability not to fear food this unending hunger ten minutes I have eaten . . . a childish dread of eating; hunger which can have no cause,— half my mind says that all this is demeaning . . . Bread
The worst thing was to think of her, of what it had been to be her, alive, to be walked, alive, into that cabin, to look into those eyes, and see the human Crab When I eat crab, slide the rosy rubbery claw across my tongue I think of my mother. She'd drive down to the edge of the Bay, tiny woman in a huge car, she'd ask the crab-man to crack it for her. She'd stand and wait as the pliers broke those chalky homes, wild- red and knobby, those cartilage wrists, the thin orange roof of the back. I'd come home, and find her at the table crisply unhousing the parts, laying the fierce shell on one side, the soft body on the other. She gave us lots, because we loved it so much, so there was always enough, a mound of crab like a cross between breast-milk and meat. The back even had the shape of a perfect ruined breast, upright flakes white as the flesh of a chrysanthemum, but the best part was the claw, she'd slide it out so slowly the tip was unbroken, scarlet bulb of the feeler—it was such a kick to easily eat that weapon, wreck its delicate hooked pulp between palate and tongue. She loved to feed us and all she gave us was fresh, she was willing to grasp shell, membrane, stem, to go close to dirt and salt to feed us, the way she had gone near our father himself to give us life. I look back and see us dripping at the table, feeding, her row of pink eaters, the platter of flawless limp claws, I look back further and see her in the kitchen, shelling flesh, her small hands curled—she is like a fish-hawk, wild, tearing the meat deftly, living out her life of fear and desire.
WATER BODY NAME POLLUTANT POLLUTANT CATEGORY TMDL STATUS EXPECTED TMDL COMPLETION DATE USEPA TMDL APPROVED DATE Channel Islands Harbor Beach Indicator Bacteria Pathogens TMDL completed 18-Dec-08 Hobie Beach (Channel Islands Harbor) Indicator Bacteria Pathogens TMDL completed 18-Dec-08 McGrath Beach Coliform Bacteria Pathogens TMDL completed Regional Board regulatory action (July 2003) McGrath Lake Chlordane (sediment) Pesticides TMDL completed 30-Jun-11 McGrath Lake DDT (sediment) Pesticides TMDL completed 30-Jun-11 McGrath Lake Dieldrin (sediment) Pesticides TMDL completed 30-Jun-11 McGrath Lake Fecal Coliform Pathogens TMDL completed 30-Jun-11 McGrath Lake PCBs (sediment) Other Organics TMDL completed 30-Jun-11 McGrath Lake Sediment Toxicity Toxicity TMDL completed 30-Jun-11 Ormond Beach (includes the area of Ormond Beach at Oxnard Drain) Indicator Bacteria Pathogens TMDL required 01-Jan-15 Peninsula Beach (affected area is beach north of South Jetty) Indicator Bacteria Pathogens TMDL required 01-Jan-19 Port Hueneme Harbor (Back Basins) DDT (tissue) Pesticides being addressed by action other than a TMDL Port Hueneme Harbor (Back Basins) PCBs (tissue) Other Organics being addressed by action other than a TMDL Port Hueneme Pier PCBs Organics TMDL required 01-Jan-19 Promenade Park Beach (affected area is south of drain at Figueroa Street) Indicator Bacteria Pathogens TMDL required 01-Jan-15 Rincon Beach (affected area is 50 yards south of mouth of Rincon Creek) Indicator Bacteria Pathogens TMDL required 01-Jan-15 San Buenaventura Beach (includes the area of San Indicator Bacteria Pathogens TMDL required 01-Jan-15
The ruling confirmed that Endeavour Coal had not bargained in good faith with employees at the Appin mine in NSW. An estimated 70 supervisory, administrative and technical employees were represented by the Association of Professional Engineers Scientists and Managers Australia Catherine Bolger, the director of APESMA's collieries division, said the originally sought to negotiate an enterprise agreement with the Appin mine in April 2010. Three months later, the tribunal made a majority support determination that acknowledged that Appin employees wanted to bargain collectively. Under the act, once a majority support determination is made the employer is required to bargain in good faith. After 12 meetings, an impasse was reached and the union subsequently succeeded in having Fair Work Australia rule that the company must adhere to bargaining orders. The company appealed to a full bench. a majority support determination is made, the full bench said, there is an expectation that the employer will recognise the wishes of its employees to bargain collectively for an agreement, and enter into negotiations in an endeavour to reach an agreement. Where this does not happen, a bargaining order may be sought to ensure that the obligation to bargain is fulfilled. The full found that in many respects the company complied with its formal requirements by participating in meetings and responding to union proposals. But it said it was open to the tribunal to find that the company was not showing a genuine endeavour to negotiate an agreement with the union. It said the company had not had a collective agreement and would prefer not to have a deal. While participating in the bargaining process, it did not make any substantive contribution to the possible content of an enterprise agreement, or put up proposals. "In circumstances it was open to the commissioner, and appropriate on the evidence, to conclude that the good faith bargaining requirements envisioned by (the act) were not being met by the company, in that it was not giving genuine consideration to the proposals being put by APESMA," the full bench said. Ms Bolger said the ruling was a "major blow for companies who think it is OK to simply go through the motions, with little interest in proper negotiations".