NTOT (tons/y) Country: FINLAND Reduction during 1995-2014 Reduction expected from 2015 and onwards Comments: Sub-basin: ARC e.g. when was the measures implemented/are they expected implemented. Further the important individual measures could be mentioned Please indicated if information is provided for the whole drainage area of CP to Baltic Sea At source/ to inland water input to the Baltic Sea Waterborne input to the Baltic Sea At source/ or to inland Waterborne input to the Baltic Sea Waterborne input to the Baltic Sea Agriculture 212 Forestry 4 Scattered dwelling 11 Storm-waters 1 WWTP, industry 74 582 97 (all point sources) Aquaculture 255 Other (specify) 61 - 329 Sum of several measures (min, max) MSFD PoMs NTOT Country: FINLAND Reduction during 1995-2014 Reduction expected from Comments:
BOB e.g. when was the measures implemented/are they expected implemented. Further the important individual measures could be mentioned Please indicated if information is provided for the whole drainage area of CP to Baltic Sea At source/ to inland water input to the Baltic Sea Waterborne input to the Baltic Sea At source/ or to inland water Waterborne input to the Baltic Sea Waterborne to the Baltic Sea Agriculture 333 Forestry 24 Scattered dwelling 22 Storm-waters 2 WWTP, industry -359 -243 312 (all point sources) Aquaculture 87 36 Other (specify) 35 - 87 Sum of several measures (min, max) MSFD PoMs NTOT Country: FINLAND Reduction during 1995-2014 Reduction expected from Comments:
Sub-basin: BOS e.g. when was the measures implemented/are they expected implemented. Further the important individual measures could be mentioned Please indicated if information is provided for the whole drainage area of CP to Baltic Sea At source/ to inland input to the Baltic Sea Waterborne input to the Baltic Sea At source/ or to inland water Waterborne input to the Baltic Sea Waterborne to the Baltic Sea Agriculture 464 BOS + (WFD) Forestry 13 " Scattered dwelling 20 " Storm-waters 3 " WWTP, industry 24 317 347 (all point sources) " Aquaculture 11 75 Other (specify) 28 - 141 Sum of several measures (min, max) MSFD PoMs, BOS + NTOT Country: FINLAND Reduction during 1995-2014 Reduction expected from Comments:
Sub-basin: GUF e.g. when was the measures implemented/are they expected implemented. Further the important individual measures could be mentioned Please indicated if information is provided for the whole drainage area of CP to Baltic Sea At source/ to inland input to the Baltic Sea Waterborne input to the Baltic Sea At source/ or to inland water Waterborne input to the Baltic Sea Waterborne input to the Baltic Sea Agriculture 262 Forestry 8 Scattered dwelling 24 Storm-waters WWTP, industry 261 3052 771 (all point sources) Aquaculture 45 80 (specify) 23 - 505 Sum of several measures (min, max) MSFD PoMs, BOS + PTOT Country: FINLAND Reduction during 1995-2014 Comments:
Reduction expected from 2015 and onwards Sub-basin: ARC e.g. when was the measures implemented/are they expected implemented. Further the important individual measures could be mentioned Please indicated if information is provided for the drainage area of CP to Baltic Sea At source/ to inland water input to the Baltic Sea Waterborne input to the Baltic Sea At source/ or to inland input to the Baltic Sea Waterborne input to the Baltic Sea Agriculture 31 Forestry 0 Scattered dwelling 3 WWTP, industry 3 17 1 (all point sources) Aquaculture 44 Other (specify) 29 - 45 Sum of several measures (min, max) MSFD PoMs PTOT Country: FINLAND Reduction during 1995-2014 Comments:
Reduction expected from 2015 and onwards Sub-basin: BOS e.g. when was the measures implemented/are they expected implemented. Further the important individual measures could be mentioned Please indicated if information is provided for the whole drainage area of CP to Baltic Sea At source/ to inland water input to the Baltic Sea Waterborne to the Baltic Sea At source/ or to inland water input to the Baltic Sea Waterborne input to the Baltic Sea Agriculture 39 BOS + QUARK (WFD) Forestry 1 " Scattered dwelling 8 " Storm-waters WWTP, industry 23,8 28 6 " Aquaculture 2 11 Other (specify) 5 - 11 Sum of several measures (min, max) MSFD PoMs PTOT Country: FINLAND Reduction during 1995-2014 Reduction expected from 2015 and onwards Comments: Sub-basin: GUF e.g. when was the measures implemented/are they expected implemented. Further the important individual measures could be mentioned
Please indicated if information is provided for the whole drainage area of CP to Baltic Sea At source/ to inland input to the Baltic Sea Waterborne input to the Baltic Sea At source/ or to inland to the Baltic Sea Waterborne input to the Baltic Sea Agriculture 38 Forestry 1 Scattered dwelling 12 Storm-waters WWTP, industry 99 39 6 (all point sources) Aquaculture 8 11 (specify) 25 - 53 Sum of several measures (min, max) MSFD PoMs
BALTIC PROPER (from LV to LT) No measures were implemented and no measures are planned to implement. Nitrogen retention in catchment: 36,4 % Phosphorus retention in catchment: 36,5% Table 1B Expected reductions in nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) inputs (in tons/y) from 2015 onwards Nitrogen reduction: Country: LATVIA Sub-basin: GULF OF RIGA Please indicated if information is provided for the drainage area of CP to Baltic Sea Reduction expected from 2015 and onwards Comments: e.g. when were the measures implemented/are they expected implemented. You can repeat e.g. agriculture if there are effects of agricultural measures already taken on inputs from 2015 and onwards, and there are expect effects of planned agricultural measures on inputs from 2015 and onwards. Important individual measures could also be mentioned At source/ or to inland water Airborne input to the Baltic Sea Waterborne to the Baltic Sea Agriculture; Regulation on methods to apply manure and when to apply it; Reducing fertilizer and manure application pr. ha – application standards pr. ha (for different crops) Not calculated Not calculated Not calculated After 2015 this kind of measure is expected to be implemented, but the reduction was not calculated, because this measure will be implemented in the whole country (Latvia). Agriculture; Construction of manure storage No such measures planned Not calculated Not calculated Measures were implemented during 1st River basin management planning period (2010 – 2015). Agriculture; Buffer strips, riparian areas around surface waters; Green fields (winter crops), collection crops 797,7 t/y Not calculated Not calculated After 2015 it is expected measures to be implemented by 2021 Forestry; Buffer strips, riparian areas around surface waters No such measures planned Not calculated Not calculated
Agriculture; Regulation on methods to manure and when to apply it; Reducing fertilizer and manure application pr. ha – application standards pr. ha (for different crops) Not calculated Not calculated Not calculated After 2015 this kind of measure is expected to be implemented, but the reduction was not calculated, because this measure will be implemented in the whole country (Latvia). Agriculture; Buffer strips, riparian areas around surface waters; Green fields (winter crops), collection crops 321,6 t/y Not calculated Not calculated 2015 it is expected measures to be implemented by 2021 Forestry; Buffer strips, riparian around surface waters No such measures planned Not calculated Not calculated WWTP; Improved WWTP efficiency 1841,9 t/y Not calculated Not calculated 2015 it is expected measures to be implemented by 2021 Further comments e.g. as retention in catchment, delay from implementing measure until the expected reduction in nitrogen and phosphorus inputs to the Baltic Sea are obtained (or when are the potential reduction in nutrient inputs to the Baltic Sea of a implementation measure obtained) Nitrogen retention in catchment: 37,1 % Phosphorus reduction: Country: LATVIA Sub-basin: BALTIC PROPER Please indicated if information is provided for the whole drainage area of CP to Baltic Sea Reduction expected from 2015 and onwards Comments: e.g. when were the measures implemented/are they expected implemented. You can repeat e.g. agriculture if are effects of agricultural measures already taken on inputs from 2015 and onwards, and there are expect effects of planned agricultural measures on inputs from 2015 and onwards. Important individual measures could also be mentioned At source/ or to inland water Airborne to the Baltic Sea Waterborne input to the Baltic Sea
Country: Poland Sub-basin: BAP Please indicated if information is provided for the whole drainage area of CP to Baltic Sea Reduction during 2000- 2012 Reduction in N and P expected from 2015 and onwards Comments: At source/or to inland water (tons/year) Airborne input to the Baltic Sea (tons/year) Waterborne input to the Baltic Sea (tons/year) At source/ to inland water (tons/year) Airborne input to the Baltic Sea (tons/year) Waterborne input to the Baltic Sea (tons/year) Agriculture Data not available Data not available t N 3386 t P Data not available Data not available Data not available Past reduction values based on PLC-4,PLC-5, PLC-6. Forestry Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Scattered dwelling Data not available Data not available 18283 t N Data not available Data not available Data not available Past reduction values based on PLC-4,PLC-5, PLC-6. Storm-waters Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available WWTP, industry WWTP: 12847 N 2244 P, INDRY: 343 P Data not available Data not available 1200-1900 t N 160- 270 t P Data not available Data not available Expected reductions as a result of The National Programme for Municipal Waste Water Treatment ( 2020). Past reduction values on PLC-4,PLC-5, PLC-6. Aquaculture Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Natural Background Data not available Data not available 14688 t N 566 t N Data not available Data not available Data not available Past reduction values on PLC-4,PLC-5, PLC-6. Atmospheric deposition (2006-2012) Data not available 1574 t N 24 t P Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Past reduction is calculated between 2006-2012. Past reduction values based on PLC-4,PLC-5, PLC-6.
Country: Sweden (SE) Sub-basin: Per country Please indicate if information is provided for the whole drainage area of CP to Baltic Sea Reduction during 1995-2014 Reduction expected from 2015 and onwards1 Comments: e.g. when was the measures implemented/are they expected implemented. Further the important individual measures could be mentioned At source/ to inland water Waterborne input to the Baltic Sea Airborne input to the Baltic Sea At source/ or to inland water Waterborne input to the Baltic Sea Airborne to the Baltic Sea Agriculture From , SE released 61 000 tonnes NHx-N in 1995. According to , in 2013, losses were 43 000 tonnes NHx-N. Reduction = 18 000 tonnes NHx-N 424,9 tonnes P 297 tonnes P Proposal includes 676 806 ha measures in agricultural land + 1 230 km two stage ditches + 6 900 tonnes manure (improved manure application). Forestry Scattered dwelling 88,81 tonnes P 62 tonnes P (assuming 30% retention) 363 632 dwellings identified as needing improved sewerage. Storm-waters 17 tonnes P 12 tonnes P (assuming 30% retention) WWTP, industry 1. Program for installing nitrogen removal in coastal mwwtps in the 1990:s (ca 70 mwwtps in KAT and BAP catchments,) to 1. The program was estimated to reduce discharges from mwwtps > 10 000 pe (to KAT, BAP) from From , SE released 362 000 tonnes NOx-N 1995. According to , SE released 38 000 tonnes NOx-N 2013. Reduction = 324 000 tonnes NOx-N 89 tonnes P 60 tonnes P (assuming 30% retention)
satisfy EU UWWT Directive. Tertiary treatment with nitrogen removal increased from ca.30 % to 70 % between 1990-2012. The degree of purification is still gradually improving. 2. An update of Regulation SNFS 1994:7 in 1998 which require increased N reduction for mwwtps > 100 000pe. The measure was estimated to reduce N load by 2000 ton N/yr at site. 3. P-free detergents, 2011. The measure was estimated to reduce N loads by 2000 ton/yr at site. 19 000 tons N/yr (in 1995) to 14000 ton/yr, i.e. a reduction of 7 000 ton/yr. 2. The measure was estimated to reduce N load to KAT and BAP by almost 2000 ton/yr, since most mwwtps are situated at or near the coast. 3. Calculated reduction was ca.50 tons P/y from treatment facilities. For the bigger mwwtps the calculated effect was rather reduction of the chemical coagulant 4. It´s difficult to quantify the