16 Trueman, Benjamin F., Eliman Camara, and Graham A. Gagnon. "Evaluating the Effects of Full and Partial Lead Service Line Replacement on Lead Levels in Drinking Water."Environmental Science & Technology 50.14 (2016): 7389-396. Web. 23 May 2017. 17 Wagner, Chelsa. "Release: Wagner Sounds Alarm on City's Dangerous Partial Lead Line Replacement Program." Alleghenycontroller.com. Allegheny County Controller, 15 May 2017. Web. 21 July 2017. 18 Troesken, Werner, Karen Rolf, Joseph P. Ferrie. “Lead Exposure and the Perpetuation of Low Socioeconomic Status.” Retrieved on July 20 from: http://www.pitt.edu/~troesken/vita/ LeadAndThePerpetuationofLowSocioeconomicstatus7.pdf 19 Sandvig, A., Pierre Kwan, Gregory Kirmeyer, Barry Maynard, R. Rhodes Trussell, Shane Trussell, Abigail Cantor, Annette Prescott. “Contribution of Service Line and Plumbing Fixtures to Lead and Copper Rule Compliance Issues.” Research Report 91229; American Water Works Association Research Foundation: Denver, CO, 2008. Web. 23 May 2017. 20 Markowitz G, Rosner D. ""Cater to the Children": The Role of the Lead Industry in a Public Health Tragedy, 1900-1955." American Journal of Public Health 90.1 (2000): 36-46. Web. 18 July 2017. 21 Secretary’s Report. Report presented at: Lead Industries Association; May 16, 1939; New York, NY. 22 Zhorov, Irina. "How We Ended up with Lead Piping and Why Removing It Will Be Hard."KeystoneCrossroads.org. Keystone Crossroads, 29 Feb. 2016. Web. 18 July 2017. 23 Jacobs, DE, Clickner RP, Zhou JY, Viet SM, Marker DA, Rogers JW, et al. 2002. The prevalence of lead-based paint hazards in US housing. Environ Health Perspect
24 Korfmacher, Katrina Smith, Maria Ayoob, and Rebecca Morley. "Rochester’s Lead Law: Evaluation of a Local Environmental Health Policy Innovation." Environmental Health Perspectives 120.2 (2011): 309-15. Web. 24 July 2017. 25 “National Primary Drinking Water Regulations.” 40 “CFR” §141.84. 1991 26 Snyder, Mary Beth. “Allegheny County Property Assessments.” Western Pennsylvania Regional Data Center, 2 Aug. 2017. 27 “Curb Box Inspection Results.” Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority, 20 June 2017. http://www.pgh2o.com/cbi. 28 “Safe Water Program Raw Data.” Office of Mayor William Peduto, 20 June 2017.
Marshall-Shadeland 6,043 $35,543 123 5 Middle Hill 1,707 $25,023 23 73 Millvale (no census data) (no census data) 290 49 Morningside 3,346 $45,224 184 26 Mount Oliver 509 $41,970 59 73 Mount Washington 8,799 $47,219 307 3 New Homestead 990 $90,652 14 10 North Oakland 10,551 $54,504 69 13 North Shore 303 $90,089 36 12 Northview Heights 1,214 $14,097 25 14 Oakwood 1,027 $37,436 27 41 Overbrook 3,644 $46,046 109 66 Perry North 4,050 $50,412 185 24 Perry South 4,145 $32,478 82 50 Point Breeze 5,315 $95,704 179 15 Point Breeze North 2,054 $38,195 51 10 Polish Hill 1,274 $33,759 71 37 Regent Square 928 $84,635 108 2 Ridgemont 483 $61,313 18 51 Shadyside 13,915 $49,393 252 75 Sheraden 5,299 $33,860 213 15 South Oakland 2,969 $28,696 104 South Shore 19 $163,773 22 South Side Flats 6,597 $44,215 178 17 South Side Slopes 4,423 $41,359 111 22 Spring Garden 884 $41,876 68 44 Spring Hill-City View 2,648 $23,844 107 73 Squirrel Hill North 11,363 $91,409 210 117 Squirrel Hill South 15,110 $59,376 375 8 St. Clair 209 $30,851 15 61
Stanton Heights 4,601 $53,354 203 1 Strip District 616 $70,706 20 13 Summer Hill 1,051 $42,547 64 22 Swisshelm Park 1,361 $79,025 85 11 Terrace Village 3,228 $11,834 36 24 Troy Hill 2,714 $40,392 132 8 Upper Hill 2,057 $34,880 65 22 Upper Lawrenceville 2,669 $34,639 129 13 West End 254 $44,963 35 5 West Oakland 2,604 $22,849 22 41 Westwood 3,066 $54,366 103 6 Windgap 1,369 $44,670 33 Figure 6. Total Residential Units Built in Pittsburgh. This frequency distribution clearly indicates that the highest rate of development in the City of Pittsburgh took place between 1931 and 1960.