X. Attachments Comparative Evaluation Criteria Locus map Deed(s) to existing Site Draft Land Disposition and Development Agreement Certificate of Non-Collusion Tax Compliance Certificate Disclosure of Beneficial Interest attachment A comparative evaluation Criteria Developer Experience & Capacity (team) Unacceptable Advantageous Highly Advantageous Demonstrated experience in and capability for designing, permitting, developing and managing projects of a similar scale and type, including mixed income residential projects. Demonstrated financial capacity as evidenced by required documentation Demonstrated experience securing financing for similar projects The adequacy of the proposed staffing plan, taking into account the experience and Development team members have had only minimal experience in the development of mixed income projects of a similar scale and type, including legal, design, development, financing, and management experience with rental housing. Development team members have had significant experience in the development of mixed-income projects of a similar scale and type, including significant legal, design, financing, affordable housing management, and development experience. [If applicable - Development team have significant and substantial successful development of mixed income housing projects of a similar scale and type, including significant legal, design, financing, affordable housing management and development experience. [If applicable -
Adequacy of proposed development budget based on current cost and market conditions Pro forma operating budget includes rents that are appropriate in relation to market as well as reasonable assumptions management, administrative costs, maintenance and utility costs Site And Building Design Unacceptable Advantageous Highly Advantageous Creative, thoughtful and efficient site design concept that is cost-effective and high quality, creates density within the context of its surroundings Site plan creates community while maintaining tenant privacy Plan reflects local design vernacular Plan provides adequate parking and adequate recreation space Design concept for market units is thoughtfully tailored to maximize the value of the units. Proposal fails to either present and support the feasibility of an attractive viable proposed design, or describe in detail the methodology and criteria to be applied in developing an attractive and viable design proposal. The proposal meets all design requirements of the RFP or outlines in reasonable detail the methodology and criteria to be applied in developing a design that meets all design requirements. The proposal exceeds the design requirements of the RFP or outlines in reasonable detail the methodology and criteria to be applied in developing a design that exceeds the design requirements. References, site visits & Interview Unacceptable Advantageous Highly Advantageous References – a minimum of three references, include references from all projects undertaken in the last 10 years Minimum of 3 references not supplied, or Strong references reflecting projects came in on time and within budget, Strong references reflecting timely completion & developer’s excellent