zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Joining Member authorizes MRC to manage rebates from Fiberight on its behalf, which MRC may direct to be spent in best interest of all Joining Members, and may offset rebates against specific charges. Fiberight to make quarterly rebate calculations acceptable to all Joining Members, and MRC to review and accept or dispute calculations. MRC to pay rebates based on actual Acceptable Waste delivered to Facility and Exhibit F of Master Waste Supply Agreement. MRC to review and dispute tipping fee calculations made by Fiberight. cause shown, Non-Charter Municipalities and readmitted Departing Municipalities are not entitled to rebates during the 15-year Initial Term. Language has been added that MRC shall review and consider in good faith any dispute of a calculation brought forward by Joining Members. 5.0 Authorization to Act for Joining Member Joining Member acknowledges it is a member of a group of entities for which MRC administers the relationship with Fiberight; agrees to be a Joining Member, to ratify the Joinder Agreement and to be a Member of MRC; and authorizes MRC to work on behalf of it and all Joining Members to administer all agreements and Site Lease and to manage MSW disposal, including ensuring Fiberight complies with its obligations. MRC’s discretion to act should be qualified by Joining Members’ rights under MRC’s articles of incorporation and bylaws, and MRC’s board’s duties under Maine corporate law; MRC has added this language. 6.0 Transportation, and Disposition of Bypass and Bridge Waste Joining Member and MRC each agrees to hear the other’s proposals for collective transportation of MSW to the Facility and/or for use of MSW-produced transportation fuel from the Facility. Joining Member acknowledges MRC has entered into agreement for disposal at Back-up Facility (Crossroads Landfill) for: Bridge Capacity Waste and Bypass Waste, and agrees to pay the Tipping Fee for Bypass Waste as if it were Acceptable Waste delivered to the Facility, and for Bridge Capacity Waste as MRC directs. MRC has entered into separate agreement with Waste Management for disposal of residuals from Fiberight and for MSW disposal at Crossroads Landfill for 10-year term with two 5-year extensions at set tipping fee; Joining Member must deliver or have delivered its Acceptable Waste exclusively to Crossroads Landfill in event of
April 9 April 11 Wage Labor Northern Growth c. 7: No One Ever Hurried, 344; The Natural Tie, 346; This Monopoly Should Be, 353; Cannot Be a Slave, 356. c. 8: Wretched Indeed, 388; Can This Be the Sabbath?, 405; Nativist & Immigrant Arguments, 408;The Money Power, 413; Repeated Injuries and Usurpations,416 WK10 April 16 April 18 Slavery Expansion Slavery & the Western Frontier p. 427-444: So Cheapened the White, 443. c. 9: Guarded from Want, 453; I Plead the Cause of White, 468. PS-3 due WK11 April 23 PART III-War, Reconstruction, and Labor, 1848-1877 April 25 Exam 2 (c. 6-9) Western Settlement p. 427-444 WK12 April 30 May 2 Slavery Compromises The Labor Question p. 499-516 c. 10: An Empty Pocket, 519; You Have Been Brave Enough, 525. WK13 May 7 May 9 Nation Divided Wartime Realities p. 533-552: Harriet Tubman Helps Slaves, 548. c. 11: I Have Never Conceived, 555; A Poor Man, 565; Go Fight for the Negroes, 574; Women & Children, 575. PS-4 due
SCHOOL FEES STRUCTURE SUMMARY ANNUAL SCHOOL FEES 2014 ITEMES BOARDING DAY + FOOD AND BREAKFAST DAY WITH NO FOOD AND BREAKFAST School Fees Food and accommodation Medical Caution money Identity card A ream of paper Building maintenance School diary report Examination & Stationeries Registration fees Graduation Remedial TOTAL 400,000/= 975,000/= 70,000/= 10,000/= 5,000/= 20,000/= 50,000/= 20,000/= 100,000/= 50,000/= 30,000/= 100.000/= 1,830,000/= 400,000/= 300,000/= 25,000/= 10,000/= 5,000/= 20,000/= 50,000/= 20,000/= 60,000/= 50,000/= 30,000/= 100,000/= 1,070,000/= 400,000/= - 25,000/= 10,000/= 5,000/= 20,000/= 50,000/= 20,000/= 60,000/= 50,000/= 30,000/= 100,000/= 770,000/=
PROJECT NAME: APPLICATION NUMBER: JOB ORDER NUMBER: APPLICATION DATE: FACILITY: PERIOD TO: (NTP?) DATE: CONTRACTOR: SCHEDULE 1 TO APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT COST BREAKDOWN BASED ON PROPOSAL SUMMARY CSI SECTIONS A B C D E F G H CSI Section No. . DESCRIPTION SCHEDULED VALUE % COMPLETE TO DATE TOTAL AMOUNT COMPLETED TO DATE (C x D) TOTAL AMOUNT COMPLETED ON PRIOR APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT AMOUNT OF THIS APPLICATION (E - F) RETENTION (5% x E)
Signed, sealed and delivered for and on behalf of the State of Victoria through the [Department’s name] by its authorised representative in the presence of: ........................................................... Witness ........................................................... Name of Witness (print) ........................................................... Authorised Representative ........................................................... Name of Authorised Representative (print) Date: _____ / _____ / _____ The terms of this document are accepted and agreed by the Proponent. [Insert Proponent’s execution block]
highlighted the key points. There were no questions. 14. MAT development update. Confidential item. 15. Research School and Opportunity Area updates. Opportunity Area funding is on hold due to elections. Research and teaching academy applications are also delayed due to elections. The governors and trustees will receive an update when it is available. 16. Policy reviews. The following policies were APPROVED: Collective worship E-safety School Dress Appearance 17. To deal with any matters agreed for consideration under point 5 above – urgent other business. There were none. 18. Date of next meeting. The next meeting will take place on 6th July at 6:00 pm. The meeting ended at 8:11 pm Signed.......................................................... Date..............................
16:20 –17:00 SESSION 4 Jo JEWELL Objective: To provide a framework for interventions to tackle the double burden of malnutrition The role of double duty actions in addressing the double burden of malnutrition Corinna HAWKES Plenary: Questions & Answers DAY 2 4 Oct 2017 CHAIR/ Speaker 09:00-09:10 Summary of day 1: What did we learn? Alexia ALFORD 09:10-10:25 SESSION 4 Jo JEWELL Objective: To provide a framework for interventions to tackle the double burden of malnutrition Framework for action and impact across the Decade of Action on Nutrition Francesco BRANCA UNICEF’s approach to the double burden of malnutrition Victor AGUAYO Bridges, linkages and opportunities in addressing malnutrition: and beyond Barry POPKIN Rachel NUGENT Plenary: Question & Answers 10:25-11:00 Coffee Break 11:00-14:45 SESSION 5 Alessandro DEMAIO Objective: To present experiences on interventions (case studies) including double-duty actions to tackle the double burden of malnutrition – impact, challenges and opportunities Nutrition-sensitive agriculture and food systems interventions Charlotte DUFOUR WCRF International NOURISHING policy framework Bryony SINCLAIR Case studies: HeLTI Linked International Intervention Cohorts Shoo LEE Promoting healthier diets through intersectoral interventions in community retail food stores Catherine MAH The Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama (INCAP) Nutrition Trial Cohort Study (INTC) in Guatemala Manuel RAMIREZ Fighting obesity in Mexico: Supporting the design and evaluation of effective social actions and public policies Simon BARQUERA Incorporating Breast feeding and Clinical nutrition criteria into Hospital accreditation system in Vietnam Duong Huy LUONG Tackling the double burden of malnutrition: the Malaysian experience Poh Bee KOON Promotion of healthy nutrition and lifestyle: experience with regulation of meal standards in schools and kindergartens in The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Igor SPIROSKI Implementation of the Kenya Breast-milk Substitutes Monitoring System Gladys MUGAMBI Panel discussion – Questions from moderator and participants 12:30-14:00 Lunch break
DKT. NO. DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT MARK “X” IN APPLICABLE COLUMN NONPARTY THAT DESIGNATED DOC. CONFIDENTIAL (IF ANY) REASON WHY DOCUMENT SHOULD REMAIN SEALED OR BE UNSEALED Parties Agree Doc. Should Remain Sealed Parties Agree Doc. Should Be Unsealed Parties Disagree
BACKWELL RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION Hon. Secretary: Mike Veal, 36 Longthorn, Backwell, BS48 3GY West of Joint Planning Consultation c/o South Gloucestershire Council Corporate Research and Consultation team Civic Centre High Street BS15 0DR 6 December 2016 Dear Sirs WEST OF JOINT SPATIAL PLAN AND JOINT TRANSPORT STUDY Backwell Residents Association (“BRA”) is an independent organization representing over 550 residents in the , which takes a keen interest in all planning matters which could influence the village. Our representatives have attended several of the exhibitions and studied the available literature and on-line material. We have sought to address all the issues throughout the region, but our comments are largely confined to the strategies which could potentially affect Backwell – notably: - Up to 3600 houses to be provided in Nailsea/Backwell, of which Backwell’s share would be 800. - A strong suggestion not to interfere with the existing Green Belt, which would mean development on the western edge of the village. - To achieve this housing total would require “improved infrastructure” –notably station improvements and a new road link from A 370 to J. 20 of M5 motorway. The proposals referred to above, if implemented, would have a profoundly damaging effect on the character and viability of the . BRA strongly objects to all of them, and questions both the logic and the ability to implement. Our reasons for objecting include: * 800 dwellings added to the existing 1750 in Backwell (i.e. an uplift of nearly 50%) would destroy the character of the village. (N.B. in the period 2012 – 2026 a total of c. 120 new dwellings is anticipated (excluding anything which might happen in Farleigh Fields, which is currently the subject of a Planning Inquiry). A similar pro-rata increase in the following 10 year period would be a reasonable, steady expansion). This level follows the reasoning identified in the Backwell Neighbourhood Plan which was only made in March 2015
1 con’t Minutes § b.(1) Pg. 4 Closed 9/3/2014 – DLA Response: Accountable activities no longer perform this process and DLA assumes the appropriate transactions are being used now. There are still a few residual Army “SCC M” assets DLA is cleaning up the records on at the Corpus Christi site. 2 Minutes § b.(1) Pg. 4 Services that are using other variations of standard procedures (e.g. pseudo Routing Identifiers Codes (RICs), hard copy forms to issue materiel while in SCC M, and other deviations noted in the discussion of the flow diagrams at paragraph c.) must provide a timeline for transition to standard MILSTRIP/MILSTRAP transactional exchange and their associated procedures. Services 6/10/2013 Closed 6/10/2013 – Air Force Response: The only item that I can think of is that for repair and return we are issuing assets to depot maintenance off-line. We have no way to track an asset via serial number. 6/14/2013 – Army Response: Please see the response to action item 11. 9/17/2014 – DLMSO Response: This item will be addressed as a SPRC 14-01, question and read ahead item at the October 22, 2014 PRC meeting. 3 Minutes § b.(1) Pg. 4 Draft the ADC for PDC 449 to eliminate the use of the 947I/DAC for movement of materiel in/out of maintenance. The draft ADC will be forwarded to the Supply PRC and JPIWG members for final review prior to official release. DLMSO 8/29/2014 Closed 6/20/2014 – DLMSO resent draft ADC 1070 to Supply PRC for review and information. ADC 1070 Release Date: September 12, 2014 pre-
April 18, 2013 19 Minutes § e. Pg.11 Air Force (Mr. Tony Scherm) to provide additional background and input for an to address questions raised before and during the meeting. Air Force 6/10/2013 Closed OBE 6/10/2013 – Air Force Response: The new process being engineered will address DACs. - See Action Item 10. 7/14/2014 – See comment on Item 10 9/17/2014 – DLMSO Response: Closed, new input requested in a SPRC 14-01, meeting question to all Services regarding transactions to move materiel in/out of maintenance. 20 Minutes § f. Pg. 11 DLA review their systemic process (SMOK) (believed to be a DLMS 511R /DIC CO_, Post-Post Requisition followed by a DLMS 945A Materiel Release Confirmation). Ms. Denise Kurtz (DLA Distribution) acknowledged the requirement to confirm the process. DLA 6/10/2013 Closed OBE 8/14/2014 – No Response from DLA 8/18/2014 – Closed, new input requested in a SPRC 14-01, pre meeting question to review and provide input on the current process and issues related to interface issues with the Services. 9/17/2014 – DLMSO Response: This relates to the Tobyhanna depot issue with the manual 1549 form used to induct to maintenance. DLA is using the DSS SMOK process to send the data based on the 1549 form. DLMSO had one email indicating it is a 940R/A5A and another that says it is a 511R/C0_. DLA asked to confirm the that may have been in flux at the Tobyhanna depot when DLA stopped doing the DAC, and Navy was unable to forward the 511R to LMP (see Army response to A/I 21).
Jaclyn Grant 78 badger circle Milton, MA 02186 Patricia One Armory Square Springfield, MA Sharmecka Horton 59 St Richard Street Roxbury, MA 02119 jane Macharia 223 marcy street southbrideg, MA 01550 ____ Nancy Lent 63 Buchanan st Winthrop, MA 02152 joanne raby 2 ugo rd salem, MA 01970 Allen Chan 14 Elmira St Brighton, MA 02135 Caroline Fahey 43 Mountain Ash Ln Pembroke, MA 02359 Victoria Webster 207 Linden Ponds Way Unit 131, MA 02043 Lynn Breymer 66 dinsmore ave #512 framingham, MA 01702 Sara Wilson 48 summit ave Athol, MA 01331 Gale Mchugo 624 Chapman St Canton, MA 02021 Adele Geldart 1101 Kirkbride Drive Unit 1111 Danvers, MA 01923 Rosanna Angelo 2 birch pond dr Saugus, MA 01906 Susan Clark 30 Bickford St Lynn, MA 01904 Patricia Toole 25 Stony Brook Rd Kingston, MA 02364 Sandra Mariano 25 Braintree Ave Quincy, MA 02169 Ann May 30 Rankin Rd Taunton, MA 02780 Judith Leanues 612 dighton ave. taunton, MA 02780 Melissa Kenney 28 Fremont St Taunton, MA 02780 Paula LeBert 126 Range Heights Rd Lynn, MA 01904 Kerry Skinner 14 Surrey Dr Plymouth, MA 02360 Patricia Porcello 22 Abington Ave. Peabody, MA 01960 ann allia 9 Powerline Dr Grafton, MA 01519 Lynne Starbard 28 Dellwood rd Worcester, MA 01602 Joseph Toto 18 Old Cedar ln South Yarmouth, MA 02664 Nicola Pring 21 Devlin Way Lynn, MA 01905 Jill Ryan 17 Bay State Blvd Paebody, MA 01960 Mary Higgins 35 Parramatta Rd Beverly, MA 01915 Yolayny Ciriaco 16 Fidelis Way 443 Brighton, MA 02135
Company No 10265276 SCALBY LEARNING TRUST (the "Company") a company limited by guarantee Minutes of a meeting of the Trustees of the Company and the Local Governing Board of Scalby School held on 1st November 2017 at 6:00 pm in the conference room of Scalby School. PRESENT Chair of Trustees Vice Chair of Trustees CEO Mr John Scoble Mr Peter Noble Mr David Read Mr Stuart Abbott Mrs Stephanie Hartley Mr Mike Goode Mr John Senior Mr Roger Cannon Trustee, Local Governing Body Trustee, Local Governing Body Trustee, Local Governing Body Local Governing Body Trustee, Local Governing Body Local Governing Body Trustee Trustee, Local Governing Body IN ATTENDANCE Company Secretary Assistant Head Teacher Deputy Head Teacher Clerk Mr Nigel Penn Mrs Maria Garfield until the end of item 5. Mr Michael McCluskie Ms Dominika Jureczko NOT PRESENT Vice Chair of Local Governing Board Mrs Sherri Williamson Mrs Sue Cammish Local Governing Body Local Governing Body The meeting started at 6.05 pm. Item Minute Action 1. Apologies for absence and to determine whether any absences should be consented to. Apologies had been received from Mrs Williamson and Mrs Cammish. The absences were given CONSENT. 2. Declaration of interests. None were declared. 3. Safeguarding review. This item was moved on the agenda by the Chair. The external safeguarding review report by Mrs Jen Cave was tabled at the meeting. It was explained that it was not ready in time for the agenda circulation. The Assistant Head Teacher gave and overview of the report and invited comments and questions. She was happy to report that the findings in the
4.3 Funding and quality mechanisms: UK health care system 4.3.1 Background The UK has a population of about 62M. Its healthcare spend is about 9.6% GDP and it has approximately 2.6 physicians per 1000 inhabitants. The corresponding ratio is 3.6 in Germany, 2.4 in the USA and 3 in Australia. Healthcare coverage, financing and organisation Healthcare coverage is universal for citizens and residents, and largely free through the National Health Service (NHS). Private hospital care is financed through voluntary insurance or at point of use. Funding comes from general taxation and payroll tax. There are co-payments imposed on prescription drugs (outpatients only) and dentistry services. Exemptions apply to children, students, over 60s and pregnant women. Overall responsibility for health care rests with Parliament, the Secretary of State for Health and the Department of Health. Since 2012 to day responsibility has been handed to the NHS Commissioning Board. Apart from some exceptions, Clinical Commission Groups (CCGs) are responsible for NHS services at a local level. 4.3.2 Hospitals Public hospitals fall under either NHS trusts or Foundation trusts. A trust is afforded Foundation status when it demonstrates sustained high performance. Foundation trusts have greater flexibility such as more access to capital funding, and the capacity to run deficits and accumulate surpluses. A recent Commonwealth Fund report states that the UK Government plans for all trusts to become foundation trusts in the future.1 4.3.2.1 Hospital funding Trusts contract with CCG’s and the NHS Commissioning Board to provide services and are reimbursed according to nationally determined rates for diagnostic groupings (HRGs) on a casemix basis. The prices or ‘tariffs’ are based on national average costs and about 60% of hospital activity is funded in this manner. To promote efficiency, each year tariffs are reduced slightly each year.2 4.3.3 Quality Explicit policy for enhancing care quality was articulated by the government in the late 1990s, comprising monitoring, standard setting and payment by results (PbR). A quality and outcomes framework for primary care was also
Board (HWBB), Barking and Dagenham Safeguarding Children Board (BDSCB) and the Safeguarding Adults Board (SAB). It covers their respective roles and functions, arrangements for challenge, oversight and scrutiny and performance management. 1.2 The Independent Chair of the BDSCB and SAB, together with the Chair of the HWBB, have formally agreed to the arrangements set out in this document, which will be subject to review -annually. 2. The Health & Wellbeing Board (HWBB) 2.1 HWBBs were established under the Health and Social Care Act 2012 and became statutory in April 2013. The Health and Wellbeing Board is an Executive Committee of the Council, with the same powers as Cabinet for matters relating to health and social care. The Council’s Constitution outlines the responsibilities of the Board. 2.2 The Board is a forum where key leaders from the Barking and Dagenham health and social care system work to improve the health and wellbeing of local residents and reduce health inequalities. The members of the Board work together to understand the needs of the local community and have strategic influence over the commissioning decisions across health and social care. The Board undertakes a Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) and develops a Joint Health and Wellbeing Strategy to develop and demonstrate how needs can best be addressed in a coordinated, planned and measurable way. 2.3 The HWBB brings together representatives from the Council, the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG), major health service providers, Healthwatch, the Metropolitan Police and NHS England to develop this shared understanding of the health and wellbeing needs of the borough. 2.3 The Health and Wellbeing Strategy identifies four key themes across a life course approach: Care and Support Protection and Safeguarding Improvement and integration of services Prevention Of particular importance for this protocol is the ‘protection and safeguarding’ theme which consists of a number of key priority areas including: Fewer children experience bullying, hate crime or domestic violence. More people from minority groups feel confident to report abuse and harassment. 3. Barking and Dagenham Safeguarding Children Board (BDSCB)
Application #_______ (assigned by granting organization) Shoreline-Lake Forest Park Arts Council | Shoreline Public Schools Foundation JOINT GRANT APPLICATION for 2016-2017 You must provide signed copies to EACH organization from which you are requesting funds. 10 copies to the Foundation and 4 copies to the Arts Council. DUE November 1, 2016 by 4:00 p.m. Applying to (check all that apply): Amount Requested: Shoreline/LFP Arts Council Artists in Schools Grant Program $ _________________ Shoreline Public Schools Foundation Classroom Grants Program $ _________________ Joint Application to both organizations (list amounts requested on lines above) TOTAL REQUEST $_________________ PROJECT TITLE: PROJECT CATEGORY (choose only one): the Music and Culture Enrichment Technology, Engineering and Math SCHOOL(S): DATE(S) of PROJECT: # of students directly participating Grade level(s) # of students indirectly impacted Grade level(s) PAST PROJECTS FUNDED: If you have been funded in the past two years, please list project name(s), year(s) and funding organization(s): NAMES OF INDIVIDUALS involved in the project: (include email address & circle appropriate title): Name | Email 1. Staff Project Leader 2. ( Staff Parent Student Community ) 3. ( Staff Parent Student Community ) 4. ( Staff Parent Student Community ) ADMINISTRATOR’S SUPPORT: I have read this proposal and will support its implementation. Project Leader’s signature X Date Principal/Manager’s signature X Date
(14) ATTACHMENTS if applicant is a partnership or corporation Send Completed form to: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ATTN: CENWP-OD-GP PO Box 2946 Portland, OR 97208-2946 Phone: 503-808-4373 Counties: Baker, Clackamas, Clatsop, Columbia, Gilliam, Grant, Hood River, Lincoln, Malheur, Morrow, Multnomah, Polk, Sherman, Tillamook, Umatilla, Union, Wallowa, Wasco, Washington, Wheeler, Yamhill Send Completed form to: DSL - West of the Cascades: Department of State Lands 775 Summer Street NE, Suite 100 Salem, OR 97301-1279 Phone: 503-986-5200 OR DSL - East of the Cascades: Department of State Lands 1645 NE Forbes Road, Suite 112 Bend, Oregon 97701 Phone: 541-388-6112 Send all Fees to: Department of State Lands 775 Summer Street NE, Suite 100 Salem, OR 97301-1279 Pay by Credit Card Online: OR U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ATTN: CENWP-OD-GE 211 E. 7th AVE, Suite 105 Eugene, OR 97401-2722 Phone: 541-465-6868 Counties: Benton, Coos, Crook, Curry, Deschutes, Douglas, Jackson, Jefferson, Josephine, Harney, Klamath, Lake, Lane, Linn, Marion
Ethics advice related to these questions should always be requested before the start of the research project as a whole and also require an examination by the federal commission for embryos Does your research involve Human Embryonic Stem Cells (hESCs)?* Will the hESCs be directly derived from embryos within this project? Are the hESCs previously established cell lines? Yes No Yes No Yes No Does your research involve the use of human embryos?* Yes No Does your research involve the use of human foetal tissues / cells?* Yes No 2. Humans Does your research involve human participants? * Are they volunteers for social or human sciences research? Are they persons unable to give informed consent? Are they vulnerable individuals or groups? Are they children/minors? Are they patients? Are they healthy volunteers for medical studies? Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Does your research involve physical interventions on human study participants?* Does it involve invasive techniques? Does it involve collection of biological samples? Yes No Yes No Yes No 3. Human Cells/Tissues Does your research involve human cells or tissues (other than from Human Embryos/Foetuses, i.e. section1)?* Are they obtained from commercial sources? Do they originate from another laboratory/institution/biobank? Were they produced or collected by you from previous research activities? Are they produced or collected by you as part of this project? Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No 4. Personal Data Does your research involve personal data collection and/or processing?(1) * Does it involve the collection and/or processing of sensitive personal data (e.g.: health, sexual lifestyle, ethnicity, political opinion, religious or philosophical conviction)? Does it involve collecting/processing of genetic information/data? Does it involve tracking or observation of participants? Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Does your research involve further processing of previously collected personal data (secondary use)?* Yes No 5. Animals Does your research involve research procedures to live non-human vertebrate animals (incl. independently feeding larval forms, foetal forms of mammals in the last trimester of their normal development and cephalopods, and also forms in earlier stages if the experiments have consequences in later stages)?* Are they vertebrates or live cephalopods? Are they non-human primates? (²) Are they genetically modified animals? Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No
maternity who are pregnant. building event includes strenuous physical activity not suitable for pregnant women. however employees may claim sex discrimination by their association with a pregnant woman. employee for promotion because senior staff believe her to be pregnant irrespective of whether she is pregnant or not. to harassment related to sex. pregnant complains of unfair treatment and is subsequently made redundant whilst on maternity leave.
the topic for both organizations, objectives for the exchange expected opportunities & activities through the exchange and a brief outlook for future joint projects/cooperation if possible. Exchange (2.1) European Twinning Partner Organization Please give a short introduction of the European organization (thematic and regional focus, key activities, projects, international experience and exchange experience, number of staff, working structure). Please indicate how your organization will engage and work with the exchange fellow during its hosting duration of the exchange
5th meeting, Podgorica, 2 December 2014 JOINT DECLARATION The EU-Montenegro Civil Society Joint Consultative Committee (JCC) is one of the bodies set up within the framework of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Union and Montenegro. The JCC enables civil society organisations from both sides to monitor Montenegro's progress towards the European Union, and to adopt recommendations for the attention of the Government of Montenegro and the EU institutions. The JCC is made up of twelve members, six from each side, representing the EESC and Montenegrin civil society. During its current term (2013–2015), the JCC is co-chaired by Andrej Zorko, member of the EESC and of the Governing board of the Slovenian Association of Free Trade Unions, and Suzana Radulović, member of the Social Council of Montenegro and Secretary General of the Montenegrin Union of Employers. The fifth meeting of the JCC was attended by Alberto Cammarata, Head of Political and Economic Section at the EU Delegation to Montenegro, and Predrag Stamatović, Secretary General of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and European Integration of Montenegro. The members of the JCC discussed the state of play in Montenegro's EU accession negotiations, with a debate on Chapters 23 (Judiciary and fundamental rights) and 24 (Justice, freedom and security), focusing on anti-discrimination policies especially regarding LGBTI & Roma rights. They also adopted reports on Chapter 20 (Enterprise and industrial policy) of the accession negotiations. Negotiations of Montenegro's accession to the European Union JCC members welcome the progress of the accession negotiations, with the opening of three new chapters. They call on continued and firm political commitment of the Montenegrin Government and state institutions to the effective implementation of the Action Plans for Chapters 23 and 24, as well as working towards further progress in other areas of alignment with the EU acquis. JCC members also call for the continuation of involvement of the civil society organizations in the implementation of the Action Plans for Chapters 23 and 24, and in the overall monitoring of accession negotiations to ensure transparency and ownership of the enlargement process. The JCC commends the fact that the Government appointed the new Council for development of non-governmental organizations in July 2014. JCC members stress that the development of the Montenegrin civil society needs to be further promoted, in particular by creating a
A mid-term assessment of activities of the working groups in the above sectors will be carried out in 2015, prior to the next Coordination Committee of Ministers, which will be held in Slovenia. Rome, 27th of May, 2014 For the Government of the Republic of Slovenia Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Karl Erjavec For the Government of the Italian Republic Minister of Foreign Affairs Federica Mogherini
Name: _____________________________ Wednesday, September 27th, 2017 ST 306-08 Centennial Regional High School Constructing a Model of a Synovial Joint The components of synovial joints are connected in a complex, yet functional design. The goal of this project is to improve your understanding of a synovial joint by designing one of your own. Read the following directions carefully. You may work by yourself, with a partner, or in a team of 3 (no teams of 4). You can choose your groups, but everyone is expected to contribute to the project evenly. You can choose any synovial joint in the body, whether we have talked about it in class in detail or not. Your joint must be able to articulate. You need to come up with a design that allows it to move as it does in the human body. You can use any materials that you like. Think of materials that are cheap, easy to find, and have the correct mechanical properties to respond to typical constraints. You can use any materials that you like, provided that they are non-perishable. Be strategic in your choice of materials, as you will have to justify your choices later. You are always welcome to ask questions and to view examples from previous students. You may also exchange ideas and suggestions with other members of this class and other classes, but you MUST produce your own project. A joint is complex, and has several components. You are welcome to be as detailed as you want, but your joint must have the components shown in the table below, and they must be labelled. Briefly brainstorm some materials that you may want to use for each. Component Materials Bones Cartilage Ligaments Tendons Muscles To better understand the joint you have selected, you will need to research it. Keep track of every source you use.
Joint Protocol Working with Homeless 16 – 17 Year Olds Young person contacts DAS (16 Plus Service or relevant Team) Young person contacts Vol. Agency Shelter, HA etc. Young person contacts HOS STAGE 1 Initial Agency contacts SC&H or Housing Dept DAS (16 Plus Service or relevant Team) Initial interview HOS Initial Interview STAGE 2 Initial Interview and Assessment HSO contacts 16 Plus Service for Information Is there a duty under Section 17 No CA 1989? Advice given to young person e.g. HOS No Duty under Part VII HA 96 Yes Yes 16 Plus Service arrange Temporary accommodation In Specific cases, case discussion 16 Plus Service / HOS regarding accommodation, resources and provision of financial support by CYF & F HOS arrange temporary accommodation STAGE 3 Temporary Accommodation Further investigation under S 17/20 CA 89 by 16 Plus Service Is there a duty? Further investigation under Part VII by HOS Is there a duty? STAGE 4 Further No Yes Yes Advice Meets criteria for joint assessment? Yes assessment panel HOS & 16 Plus Service Yes criteria for joint assessment? STAGE 5
8. Where did you have conversations with carers? 9. How did carers know you’ve kept your (organisational/ individual) promises? 10. What practical help/information/ resources did carers need in relation to the topic under discussion and how will you provide it at the same time as having conversations with carers? 11. How did you tell carers about any obstacles whilst still working towards change?
ONCE IT’S OVER 12. What are the lessons you’ve learned and how will you pass them on so others benefit? 13. Once changes/ improvements have been made, how can you celebrate and promote them with carers and others? If you’d like help making the planner work locally, call us at Creative Carers on 01332 227711. We’re a carer-led community organisation so please bear in mind costs usually apply. Contact details for the Patient Experience Team at Royal Derby Hospital: Email: or Phone: 01332 787 382. CARERS CONVERSATION PLANNER - CHECKLIST
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION In re [ ,] Debtor(s). [ ,] Plaintiff(s), v. [ ,] Defendant(s). ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Adv. Proceeding No. [Insert trial date(s), time, location and presiding judge.] JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER The parties having conferred among themselves and with the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 (made applicable to this Adversary Proceeding pursuant to F.R.B.P. 7016(a)), the following statements, directions and agreements are adopted as the Pretrial Order herein. Unless modified by the Court, this Order controls the course of this proceeding. NATURE OF THE CASE [Set forth a brief statement of the general nature of the action and the relief sought by each party.]
Terra Mileniul III Lucian Stirb str George Missail, nr 116 B sector 1 011544, Bucharest Romania lucian.stirb@terramileniultrei.ro www.terramileniultrei.ro/ Za Zemiata Todor Todorov 11 B "Yanko Sakazov" 1504 Sofia Bulgaria t.todorov@zazemiate.org www.zazemiata.org Also part of Joint Project: Foundation for Environment and Agriculture, Agroecofund Bulgaria http://feabg.org/ Hungarian Environmental Partnership Foundation Hungary http://okotars.hu/en
SEO/AMA Shaun Deacon UK Catapult Dan Wicks UMD/GEOGLAM Sec Alyssa Whitcraft (remote) USGS Gene Fosnight USGS Jenn Lacey APPENDIX B Actions Record Action Due Date Action 1 LSI-VC to develop a roadmap for CARD4L production for the thematic groups’ reference. December 2017 Action 2 SDCG-GFOI and CEOS-GEOGLAM to provide feedback on the CARD4L PFS by engaging in the reviews that will be coordinated by LSI-VC. December 2017 Action 3 SDCG to connect with Jeff Masek regarding the testing of HLS data for GFOI Pilots. December 2017
Contents Introduction This guidance is for inspectors conducting joint targeted area inspections (JTAI) of arrangements and services for children in need of help and protection in local authority areas in England. These inspections are undertaken by Ofsted, the Care Quality Commission (CQC), Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary
DRAFT- Joint Regional Response Team I & 2 Meeting Agenda Location- Hilton Burlington- Lake Champlain Room 60 Battery St. Burlington, VT Tuesday, October 30 2018 8:30 AM- 9:00 AM Registration 9:00 AM- 9:15 AM Welcome, Introductions, and Administrative Announcements RRT Co-Chairs, RRT Coordinators 9:15 AM- 11:00 AM *Include a 15 min break* Storage, use, and effects of Fire Fighting Foam NY DEC, Matt Franklin MA DEP, Nick Child USCG D9 11:00 AM- 11:45 AM PHMSA Emergency Response Plan Training Chris Ruhl, PHSMA 11:45 AM- 1:00 PM LUNCH LUNCH 1:00 PM- 3:15 PM *Include a 15 min break* State Reports 1) ME 5) RI 2) NH 6) CT 3) VT 7) NY 4) MA 8) NJ 3:15 PM- 4:00 PM Fentanyl Drug Response Mike Nalipinski, EPA 4:00 PM- 4:15 PM Action Item Review, Closing Comments, Adjournment RRT Co-Chairs, RRT Coordinators 4:15 PM- 4:45 PM Breakout sessions: Relevant Topics Wednesday, October 31, 2018 8:30 AM- 9:00 AM Registration 9:00 AM- 9:30 AM Welcome, Introductions, and Administrative Announcements RRT Co-Chairs, RRT Coordinators 9:30 AM- 10:30 AM 2017 Hurricane ESF-10 Environmental Impacts USCG National Strike Force Coordination Center (NSFCC)/ EPA Region 2 10:30 AM-10:45 AM BREAK BREAK 10:45 AM- 11:15 AM Research & Development Center Updates Alex Balsley, USCG R&D Center 11:15 AM- 11:45 AM Munitions Guidance Sector Delaware Bay 11:45 AM- 1:00 PM LUNCH LUNCH
Week 1 Mon (day 0, week one) Notification Notification Wed (day two, week one) 3.00pm Child level lists Lists 6 to 8 including: Is the child at risk of, or subject to, sexual abuse in the family environment (Y/N)? (as set out in paragraph 20) Child level lists Lists 6 to 8, including: Is the child at risk of, or subject to, sexual abuse in the family environment (Y/N)? (as set out in paragraph 20) Additional columns for all children identified as at risk or subject to sexual abuse in the family environment as set out in paragraph 26. Thu (day three, week one) 9.30am Lead inspector provides up to 20 cases for additional information 4.00pm For the 20 selected cases, the local area provides the additional information set out in paragraph 23 Fri (day four, week one) 10.00am Lead inspector provides five to seven cases to the local authority for further tracking. Lead inspector provides five to seven cases to the local authority for further tracking. 12.00pm Lead inspector telephone call with the local authority Lead inspector telephone call with the local authority Week 2 Mon Tue (day six, week two) Key documents for cases being tracked Annex A documents Key documents for cases being tracked Annex A documents Wed (day seven, week two) 10.00am Additional child level data tables (see paragraph 32) Including for assessments and Section 47s: Is the child at risk of, or subject to, sexual abuse in the family environment (Y/N)? Additional child level data tables (see paragraph 32) Including for assessments and Section 47s: Is the child at risk of, or subject to, sexual abuse in the family environment (Y/N)?
− significant changes in the nature of the JVC’s business; − major acquisitions or disposals; − annual revenue/capital budget; − capital expenditure or contract commitments above pre-agreed limits; − borrowing limits; − dividend policy; − appointment and dismissal of key management; − material dealings with intellectual property rights; and −dealings between the JVC and its shareholders (except, perhaps, arms’ length dealings in the ordinary course of business). 4. Minority Protection If a minority participant is involved, it will wish to protect its interests through: - · participating in management through board representation; · being involved in major decisions (including, possibly, a right of veto); · protecting against its equity stake being improperly diluted; · ensuring proper distribution of profits; · establishing adequate access to information regarding the joint venture’s affairs; and
Please give any details of why you would like or need to receive a floating support service and how you feel this support will benefit you. From the table below, please tick what types of support you feel you require: Economic wellbeing Enjoy and achieve Be healthy Stay safe Make a positive contribution Money management & budget skills Participating in learning & training Improving or maintaining good physical health Maintaining safe and secure accommodation Improving motivation and involvement Accessing Work Accessing social activities Improving or maintaining good mental health Addressing issues leading to Homelessness Improving confidence Accessing Benefits Accessing religious & cultural activities. Reducing or addressing drug use Maximising Independent living skills Achieving greater choice or control Enhancing childcare & parenting skills Reducing or addressing alcohol use Addressing issues of domestic abuse Other-(please state) Improving communication skills Accessing aids & adaptations Addressing issues of offending behaviour Accessing relevant health care
Join the live streaming event on 3 July to celebrate the amazing contributions nursing, midwifery and care staff have made since the launch of the NHS in 1948. As the NHS turns 70, we are placing nursing, midwifery and care staff at the very centre of national celebrations and on 3 July, four regional events will recognise the remarkable contribution nursing, midwifery and care staff have made to our NHS over the last seven decades and look to the next 70 years. Each event will launch with a live streamed opening speech from Professor Jane Cummings, Chief Nursing Officer for England. This will immediately be followed by an opportunity for us all to link together, ask questions and reflect on our amazing achievements. Following the key note speech, Teresa Chinn MBE will join the live stream to showcase many innovative blogs written by nurses and midwives as part of our national #70nursebloggers and #70midwifebloggers initiative, launched by Professor Jane Cummings on Tuesday 24 April. Delegate attendance at the actual events is limited but Professor Cummings’ speech and Teresa’s blogging session can be viewed live at 0945-1045 on the website using any internet connected device using the following link: The four regional events will take place at the following locations: London: The Royal Horticultural Halls, 80 Vincent Square London SW1P 2PE South: Reading Old Town Hall, Blagrave St, Reading RG1 1QH Midlands and East: Crowne Plaza Hotel, Wollaton St, Nottingham NG1 5RH North: York Racecourse, Racecourse Road, Knavesmire Road, York YO23 1EX The events will also be tweeting throughout the day, each one having a dedicated hashtag and using the national #NHS70 hashtag as well to collate the discussion. If you use twitter, you can follow and contribute to the discussion on the day using #NHS70. In addition, if you are attending any of the regional events or would like to recognise or contribute to a specific discussion or session online, you can use the regional hashtag as well: #NursingMidwiferyNorth #NursingMidwiferySouth #NursingMidwiferyMidsEast #NursingMidwiferyLondon Professor Jane Cummings will also be taking some questions via Twitter on the day. To submit a question, send a direct message to @6CsLive.
Page 2 Faculty and Staff Opening Meeting SAC/High Schools That Work/Student Activities Priority Plan (Challenge to Achieve) Title I Teacher Duty Assignments Student Discipline Textbooks Student Activities Gradebooks Receipts Professional Development (Planning, Conferences, Education) Professionalism The Lee County School District Board Policy Manual is available as a quick link on the Lee County School District website: www.leeschoolsk12.org. A copy of the 2014-2015 Lee Central High School Faculty and Staff Handbook will be provided to all staff members. Your signature indicates that you fully understand that it is the responsibility of faculty and staff members to review the Lee County School District Board Policy Manual and Lee Central High School Handbook in their entirety. If I have questions and/or concerns it is my responsibility to bring them to the attention of the Administration immediately for clarification. ____________________________________ ________________________________ Faculty or Staff Member’s Name Signature (Please Print) ____________________________________ Date DISCLAIMER Nothing in this handbook or in any policy manual of Lee County School District or Lee Central High School constitutes or creates an express or implied contract; rather, this handbook should be understood as a brief description of the benefit offered by Lee County School District and/or Lee Central High School and an overview of its policies and procedures. This handbook supersedes all previous handbooks or other documents that address the same subject matter as the policies and rules contained in this handbook. Beginning with the school year, the Lee County School District Board Policy Manual is available online at www.leeschoolsk12.org. The school and/or district reserve(s) the right, at their discretion, to update all statements in the handbook that are consistent with approved policies, procedures, and legal requirements as set forth as best practices. The Board of School Commissioners may elect to notify or make exceptions to the policy manual at any time. Due notice of changes will be provided.
Alma Mater Lee Central High, we love thy Black and Gold And in our hearts, we’ll sing it loud and bold Where ever we go, we’ll hold thy standards high We’ll be loyal until the day we die We’ll be loyal until the day we die. Lee Central High will be our alma mater Proudly we’ll bear our Black and Gold forever We’ll defend and honor as loyal sons and daughters Lee Central High, we’ll love and cherish thee Lee Central High, we’ll love and cherish thee Stallions are we; we’ll defend and honor thee. Thomas A. Slater
cube in front of you. Look carefully. I want you to draw the cube. Draw exactly what you see. Draw the very best you can.” All participants were able to complete their visual realism drawings within the time limit. All participants were thanked for taking part in the study after each session. Scoring and Inter-rater Reliability Expressive drawing measures Each drawing was assessed using a comprehensive range of five measures of expression: overall quality, color, composition, line and content. These measurements were developed by two experienced female professional English artists specifically for this research in discussions facilitated by the research team. The first artist, holding a BA honours degree in fine art (painting), has exhibited her work in galleries in many English cities. She describes her style of painting as ‘figurative towards abstractive, with an emphasis on expressing emotion rather than reality’. The second artist, holding a BA and MA in fine art, has exhibited her work in galleries and other venues in England and France. She has also run many art workshops with children for over 20 years. She describes her own painting style as ‘semi-abstract, being idea-based and experimental’. As the artistic styles of both raters leaned more towards expressive and conceptual art rather than representation, they each had the appropriate expertise in judging expressive drawings. The artists were blind to the hypothesis of the study, and to the age, gender and artistic experience of the drawer. Furthermore, they were asked to rate the drawings on their expressive merit only, and not to take into account the expected ability based on any conjecture of the age of the drawer. For overall quality, color, composition and line separate 7-point scales for each measure were generated by the artists, in which detailed descriptions of each grade-point were formulated and written in a ratings booklet. For the overall quality of expression measure the artists were asked to consider the overall expressive impact of each drawing considering both the subject