Desert Operations System CARD: 1.2.1x.s Environmental Conditions: 3.2; Basing & Deployment Description CONOPS: OPLAN 5500, para 3.1; CDD (May 24, 2014): Para 3 Increased scheduled maintenance cycle; filter demand and filter cost Design Interface; Supply; Technical Data; Higher Incidence of Failure Include filter system to filter to 0.1µ DESIGN FEATURE (AFLCMC Additional Guidance: Include assessment of materials in his section) Hydrazine System CARD: 1.2.1.x.2 Environmental Conditions: 3.4.3 Training: 5.0 6 additional personnel per operating wing; equipment, facilities and IPE Manpower & Personnel; Training; Support Equipment Facilities Specialized manning, training, & facilities / alternative power sources addressed in ongoing trade study; ECD: Jun 2013 Nuclear Hardening System CARD CDD (May 24, 2014): Para 10 Specialized test equipment at field and depot Training Design Interface; Maintenance; Training; Support Equipment Flight controls and weapon control/delivery system shielded FACILITIES/MILCON Low Observable System CARD: 10.2 Operational Support Facilities CDD: Para 12, Assets required to achieve IOC One shelter for each assigned or deployed asset One repair hanger per 12 assigned aircraft Design Interface; Maintenance; Training; Support Equipment; Facilities. Low observables coatings require individual shelters and specialized operational and depot facilities Table 3-2: Sustainment Cost Drivers (Mandated) (NOTIONAL) Expectation: The PSM must identify the considerations, sources, and the product support elements affected that are a sustainment cost driver. Product Support Strategy considerations are derived from multiple sources and can be explicit (e.g. hydrazine), implicit (e.g. low observable), or derived (e.g. desert operations). The table’s sub-headings (e.g., CONOPS, Design Feature, and MILCON) are NOTIONAL. AFLCMC Additional Guidance: Cost drivers listed must be documented at a level that is actionable. Listing an overall products support element as a cost driver does not meet the intent of this section. For example do not say that “Technical Data” is a cost driver, rather, “Purchase of technical data to support organic depot activation” is a more specific description of the cost driver.
Source of Repair Analysis Public Law 111- 23 MS-C, Nov 2014 As required Depot TAT Partnership 10 USC 2474 HQ AFMC/A4 MS-B, Sep 2013 MS-C; Every 5 years after IOC Availability KPP Reliability KSA Corrosion DODI 5000.67 (Feb 2010) PSM/ Contractor RFP, Sep 2011, 008 MS-B MS-C Every 5 years after IOC Availability KPP IUID DODI 5000.02 (Dec 08) DODI 8320.04 (Jun 08) PSM/ Contractor RFP, SEP 2011 007 MS-B MS-C FRPDR CBM + DODI 4151.22 (Dec 07) RFP, SEP 2011 Availability KPP Serialized Item Management DOD 4140.1-R DODI 4151.19 (Dec 06) RFP, SEP 2011 Supply Chain Risk Management DEPSECDEF DTM 09-16, SCRM to Improve the Integrity of Components Used in DOD Systems DODI 5200.39 (Jul 08) RFP, SEP 2011 Affordability AT&L Better Buying Power Memo, Nov 3, 2010 DMSMS SD22 PSM/ Contractor RFP, Sep 2011, 009 On-going through production Availability KPP Counterfeit Parts Others Service Specific Table 6-1: Sustainment Alignment of Regulatory/Statutory Requirements (Mandated) (NOTIONAL) Expectation: Illustrate the PSM’s recognition and compliance with statutory, regulatory, and policy requirements, their inclusion in RFP/contracts and how those requirements are tied to performance metrics. AFLCMC Additional Guidance: For documents that are in work or in coordination, include an ECD in the “Start Date/Implementation Date” column as appropriate. Integrated Schedule Provide a detailed, integrated, life-cycle sustainment system schedule (Figure 7-1) covering all of the integrated product support elements, which is consistent with the integrated master schedule events, and emphasizes the next acquisition phase. Schedule items shall include, but are not limited to:
Tool OPR/IPT Metrics/Data Monitored Feedback Mechanism Review Logistics Health Assessment PSM Product Support Elements Direct feedback from SAF/AQ Monthly Sustainment Quad Chart PSM AO, AM, Rm, MDT, and O&S costs Automatic updates to Program Executive Officer and ASD (L&MR) via Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval. Metrics feed from Global Combat Support System - Air Force Quarterly DAES PM and PSM Cost, Schedule, Sustainment performance and Funding Direct feedback from OSD through Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval Quarterly Weapon System Enterprise Review PSM AM; Unit possessed not reported (UPNR) rate; NMCS; NMC –- Maintenance (NMCM); NMC – Both (NMCB); Depot possessed Direct feedback from AFMC/A4 Quarterly Centralized Asset Management PSM Overall weapon system health assessment Weapons system health assessment measurement against FY efficiency metrics Quarterly Aircraft Availability Improvement Plan PSM AM, UPNR, NMCS, NMCM, NMCB, Depot possessed Approved plan between ACC/A4 and PM submitted to AFMC/A4 Annually Pre-IOC Support Review PM, PSI, and warfighter Comprehensive review of performance and acceptance criteria Certify PSI/Providers plans meet warfighter requirements Verify PSI/Provider agreements/contracts and funding are in place Prior to IOC per contract