zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
CRIMINAL POSSESSION OF COMPUTER RELATED MATERIAL Penal Law § 156.35 ( Committed on or after Nov. 1, 1986) (Revised June 5, 20121) The (specify) count is Criminal Possession of Computer Related Material. A person is guilty of criminal possession of computer related material when having no right to do so, that person knowingly possesses, in any form, any copy, reproduction or duplicate of any computer data or computer program which was copied, reproduced or duplicated in violation of law2, with intent to benefit himself or herself or a person other than an owner thereof. The following terms used in that definition have a special meaning: POSSESS means to have physical possession or otherwise to exercise dominion or control over tangible property.3 A person KNOWINGLY possesses computer data or a computer program when that person is aware that he or she is in 1 The 2012 revision was for the purpose of inserting definitions of the terms “possess” and “knowingly,” and adding “knowingly” in the listed elements of the crime. 2 The statute at this point reads: “in violation of section Penal Law § 156.30 of this article.” The substituted phrase “in violation of law” is defined below by incorporation of the elements of Penal Law § 156.30. 3 Penal Law §10.00(8). If necessary, an expanded charge on the meaning of physical possession and constructive possession may be
megawatts (MW) of transmission service under Idaho Power’s Open Access Transmission Tariff (OATT) in place of the current amounts paid by PacifiCorp to Idaho Power under the Legacy Agreements, part of the 1,600 MWs to meet PacifiCorp’s operational needs. With OATT-based transactions, all operations will continue to be governed by current reliability standards and industry business practice language instead of reconciling the language of the Legacy Agreements, which PacifiCorp asserts are antiquated and whose language can be subject to interpretation and disagreement. Additionally, PacifiCorp asserts that OATT-based transactions will add flexibility, transparency, more efficient use of assets, and may facilitate new market development, such as the Energy Imbalance Market. Asset Exchange PacifiCorp states that its capacity needs above the amount to be served under the OATT is the basis for determining the asset exchange portion of the application. PacifiCorp claims that it needs 1,090 MW of east-to-west capacity across the existing Idaho Power transmission system. PacifiCorp will meet this capacity need through the acquisition of ownership in facilities between Adelaide, Borah, Kinport, and Midpoint in Idaho. Per PacifiCorp, the exchange will provide it with capacity and ownership on three Jim Bridger transmission lines. Idaho Power will receive capacity and ownership on the same lines. The asset exchange is summarized as follows: PacifiCorp will receive capacity and ownership in the following substations and transmission
The new arrangement will align with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s preference for transactions to be OATT-based. OATT-based transactions will add flexibility and transparency, allowing for more efficient use of the assets. This transaction will eliminate or amend the Legacy Agreements. The asset exchange will resolve certain transmission operational issues to ensure continued safe and reliable electric service. The transaction will not affect PacifiCorp’s ability to perform its public duties. The exchange benefits PacifiCorp and is in the best interest of its customers from an operational standpoint. This decision does not trigger CEQA. Hearings are not necessary. This proceeding should be closed. The application should be approved. IT IS ORDERED that: The Application of PacifiCorp for authorization to enter into an asset exchange with Idaho Power Company is approved. the asset exchange is closed, PacifiCorp and Idaho Power Company must true-up the net book values of the assets exchanged, and the company receiving assets with a higher net book value than the corresponding assets it is
by the telephone corporation. Most prepaid wireless customers are therefore not purchasing prepaid wireless phone cards at a third party retailer to procure services. As discussed, a lesser part of the prepaid wireless market, namely 25.17%, is transacted at a third party retailer. This is the market segment that the new MTS surcharge collection and remittance process was designed to collect from. According to 2014 data, indirect sales annually account for about 3.34% of those surcharges and fees collected by the Commission from telephone corporations and VoIP providers. Chart 1: California Telecommunications Market by Service and Sales Type DISCUSSION Calculating the MTS Surcharge The Act requires the Commission to start the calculation of the new prepaid MTS surcharge rates, which will become effective on January 1, 2016, by October 1, 2015, to post notice of the proposed rates by October 8, 2015, and to notify the BOE and Office of Emergency Services of the rates, as well as the method used for calculation. The Commission will thereafter start the calculation of the new MTS surcharge rates by October 1st and post notice by October 8th of subsequent years, until the Act becomes inoperative in 2020. The Act directs the Commission to prepare a resolution, or other public document, to provide public notice of the proposed MTS rates and to adopt the proposed rates. In response to this requirement, this resolution provides the methodology and specific calculations used to arrive at the new prepaid MTS surcharge rates for 2016. The proposed rates are to be assessed on the sale of intrastate prepaid wireless telephone services in California. Although the Act shifts certain surcharge collection activities to the BOE, due to the bifurcation of the collection and remittance process for surcharges and user fees between prepaid wireless services and all other services, the Act has resulted in increased costs and administrative activity for the Commission. The State legislature has authorized the CPUC to hire additional staff and develop new systems and business processes for the special MTS surcharge. This includes, but is not limited to, at least two new processes, one for those fees required to be remitted directly by prepaid wireless carriers and another for those funds collected by the BOE.
R-2017-2631441- PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. REYNOLDS WATER COMPANY (Revised 3/26/18) THOMAS T NIESEN ESQUIRE THOMAS NIESEN & THOMAS LLC 212 LOCUST STREET STE 302 HARRISBURG PA 17101 717.255.7600 E-SERVICE *CARRIE B WRIGHT ESQUIRE JOHN M COOGAN ESQUIRE PA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND ENFORCEMENT PO BOX 3265 HARRISBURG PA 17105-3265 717.783.6156 717.786.6151 *E-SERVICE CHRISTINE M HOOVER ESQUIRE HARRISON W BREITMAN ESQUIRE OFFICE OF CONSUMER ADVOCATE 5TH FLOOR FORUM PLACE 555 WALNUT STREET HARRISBURG PA 17101 717.783.5048 E-SERVICE C-2017-2636654 JAMES VESSELLA 106 17TH STREET GREENVILLE PA 16125 C-2017-2634797 JOHN D’URSO 102 17TH STREET GREENVILLE PA 16125 C-2017-2636679 BEA DE CIANCIO 105 14TH STREET GREENVILLE PA 16125 C-2017-2635838 MARGARET FOUST 1202 BRENTWOOD DRIVE GREENVILLE PA 16125 C-2018-2644372 PLEM PATTERSON 105 17TH STREET GREENVILLE PA C-2018-2647045 MATTHEW NESTOR 106 12TH STREET GREENVILLE PA 16125 C-2018-2647060 RYAN FOUST 1306 BRENTWOOD DRIVE GREENVILLE PA 16125 C-2018-2647069 BRIAN HILLS 202 EAST 13TH STREET GREENVILLE PA 16125 C-2018-2647070 LAUREL LITWILER 510 MOSS LANE GREENVILLE PA 16125 C-2018-2647272 THOMAS HANZES 106 NORTH 16TH STREET GREENVILLE PA 16125 C-2018-2647305 CLARK EBERHART REYNOLDS VFW 115 EDGEWOOD DRIVE GREENVILLE PA 16125 C-2018-2647318
Register your interest Full Name Position Company Address Post Code Company name in Brazil: CNPJ: Insc. Municipal / Estadual Tel: Email Number of places @ (R$ 100,00 / £ 24.00) EIC Members TOTAL: R$/ £ Number of places @ (R$ 180,00 / £ 44.00) EIC Non-Members TOTAL: R$/ £ Names Job Title Emails Additional Delegates: Please select a method of payment: Identified Deposit Associação EICUK Rio | Itaú Ag. 8410 / CC. 06339-3 | CNPJ 03.941.315/0001-21 If you prefer to pay in the UK – (by an International Credit Card) Card Number Expiry Date Start Date 3 security no. Name on card Card registered to house no. & postcode Visa MasterCard Amex Other
that were delivered to the IOUs and posted to on March 27, 2015. The final scores for each IOU are as follows: PG&E: 53/100 SCE: 58/100 SoCalGas: 69.5/100 SDG&E: 68/100 D.13-09-023 prescribes that the IOUs’ incentive award for the ex ante review component of the ESPI is the product of the final score and the earnings cap for the component. Components 3 and 4 The management fees for codes and standards programs and non-resource programs are calculated as a percentage of the IOUs’ program expenditures, less administrative expenditures, for each program type. Incentive Earnings Cap Calculations The incentive earnings caps across the 2013-14 cycle for each component and each IOU were adopted in D.13-09-023 as follows: 1: 2013-14 Total Award Caps by Component and IOU (in millions) Component Cap PG&E SCE SoCalGas SDG&E Energy savings performance 9% of resource program budget C&S) $ 58.9 $ 40.9 $ 12.5 $ 14.5 Ex ante review performance award 3% of resource program budget (minus C&S) $ 19.6 $ 13.6 $ 4.2 $ 4.8 Codes & Standards (C&S) 12% of C&S program budget $ 1.4 $ 1.16 $ 0.18 $ 0.23
Gold Standard Medication Admission Comparison Discharge Comparison Name: Dose/Route/ Frequency: Drug Class: PRN OTC Pt Adherence: Completely Sporadically Comments: All Sources Used: Patient Pill Bottles Outpatient EMR Transfer Records Pharmacy(s) Other: Systematically Adherent Patient’s family/Caregiver Patient’s Own Med List Outpatient Provider(s) Past DC Summary Pharmacy Database Note Differences: (select all that Dose Frequency Additional med Duplication Duration Reason: Unintentional (History or Reconciliation Error) Intentional (Clinical Reason) Omission Route Substitution Formulation Other: Note Differences: (select all that Dose Frequency Additional med Duplication Duration Reason: Unintentional (History or Reconciliation Error) Intentional (Clinical Reason) Omission Route Substitution Formulation Other: Were there any unintentional discrepancies between the gold standard and the admission order? Yes No If “yes,” count as 1 Were there any unintentional discrepancies between the gold standard and the discharge order? Yes No If “yes,” count as 1 *Completely non-adherent means the patient has not been taking the medication for at least 30 days. If completely non-adherent, do not include. Move on to the next Gold Standard Medication.
Oil of Cloves Apply on cotton wool directly onto tooth cavity. Do not use if sensitive to Clove Oil or Eugenol or if gums are damaged. For the temporary relief of toothache Throat Lozenge Kaysils Throat Lozenges Contains glucose, be aware for diabetics. For the relief of sore throats. Kaysils Menthol Eucalyptus Contains glucose, be aware for diabetics For the relief of sore throats Kaysils Extra Strong Lozenge Contains glucose, be aware for diabetics For the relief of sore throats Verrucas Bazuka Gel (extra strength) 1 or 2 drops, once every night. Do not use if sensitive to any of the ingredients. For the treatment of Verrucas, warts, corns and calluses. Indigestion Magnesium Trisilicate Mixture Not for use under 5 yrs old. 5-12 yrs: x1 –x2, 5ml x3 times a day. 12+ yrs: x2 - x4, 5ml x3 times a day. Do not use if allergic to MTM. Reduced stomach acid can result in high alkali in blood resulting in low level of calcium or phosphate. For symptomatic relief of indigestion, Heartburn and dyspepsia, Bach Rescue Remedy 2 sprays on tongue. Support at of emotional distress. ABBERLEY HALL WORCESTERSHIRE WR6 6DD MEDICATION FORM NAME OF CHILD ………………………………………………………….…….. Name and details of medication (as described on the container) ……………………………………………………………………………………… How long will your child take this medicine?........................................... Full directions for use.
Dates to be given Times to be given Dosage & method Amount given Signed by whom administered Running total Notes (side effects, precautions etc) I ……………………………………………………………….. give permission for a member of staff to administer the above medication on the date/s shown. Signed…………………………………………. Date……………………………
Executive Summary of Mark Distribution ..................................... 7 Assessment Exams ………………………………………………8-13 Appendix – A (Sub – Intern Progress Note) ...…………………...14 Appendix – B (Tutorial Schedule) ……………………………….15 Appendix – C (Long Case Feed Back Form) .……………………16 Appendix – D (Skill to be acquired) …………………………….17-24
As the form will be sent to the lender’s solicitor/conveyancer, there is no need to inform the valuer of any subsequent changes. If any changes are made then the sooner the lender’s solicitor/conveyancer receives the form and is made aware, the better. 9) What happens if further incentives are offered after the form has been submitted to the lender’s solicitor/conveyancer? If this situation arises, then the developer’s/seller’s solicitor/conveyancer should inform the lender’s solicitor/conveyancer immediately. Ideally this will be through an amended version of the form, but it may just be a letter, email confirming the changes. 10) How does the RICS Red Book reflect the requirements imposed by the form? The Disclosure Form requirements are part of the mandatory requirements in UK Valuation Standard 3.1 "Residential Property Mortgage Valuations" and UK Appendix 10 "RICS residential mortgage valuation specification". The procedure provides clarity of approach to the identification of incentives and the purchase price of the property to be valued. RICS has produced a Guidance Note on The Valuation of Individual New Build Homes as further guidance for its members. 11) How are the requirements of the form reflected in the existing instructions to solicitors/conveyancers in the Lenders’ Handbook? In short, the form does not override or discharge any duty solicitors/conveyancers have to the lender through instructions provided elsewhere in the Lenders’ Handbook. The form is a simple way of drawing together the information that a solicitor/conveyancer is already required to collect on behalf of the lender, as well as some additional information that is required for the valuer. The solicitor/conveyancer is not being asked to verify the information contained in the form, but should simply confirm with the buyer/borrower that the information provided on the form regarding the agreed sales price and incentives offered is in line with the buyer/borrower’s understanding. The solicitor/conveyancer will only be required to report the information provided on the form to the lender in line with the lender’s instructions in part 2 of the Lenders’ Handbook. For example, some lenders only require information on incentives where they are in excess of 5% of the purchase price reported.
ICC8S8 Evaluates instruction or therapy and monitor progress of individuals with exceptional learning needs Clearly describes data collection methods to stakeholders Clearly explains the progress to stakeholders using data Clearly describes a decision about future goals based on data Somewhat describes data collection methods to stakeholders Somewhat explains the progress to stakeholders using data Somewhat describes a decision about future goals based on data Does not describe data collection methods to stakeholders Does not explain the progress to stakeholders data Does not describe a decision about future goals based on data Content Issues Technical Issues Quality of Work Issues Synthesis Issues Comprehensive Project Scoring For Autism MEd Content Mastery: Subskill Exceeds Expectations -5 4 Meets Expectation-3 2 Unacceptable-1 Conduct indirect assessment to identify primary target behaviors for treatment, and complete operational definitions of the behaviors Provides a complete operational definition with examples and non-examples; based on social validity analysis Provides a complete operational definition with examples and non-examples Incomplete operational definitions
M.Ed. RUBRIC CRITERIA UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE EXEMPLARY RATING 1. Understand and apply Leadership Theory with synthesis of subject areas, including appropriately cited, related literature from the M.Ed. course content and beyond. The student exhibits an inadequate level of understanding of the interrelationships among the knowledge, professional behaviors, and performances in the field of Educational Leadership. The committee hereby recognizes the student’s failure to meet the standard. The student exhibits an adequate mastery of the knowledge, skill, professional behaviors, and performances in Educational Leadership and is adept at summarizing and applying related theories in which theoretical content applies to field-based practices. The committee hereby recognizes the student’s success at meeting the standard. The student demonstrates an impressive depth of knowledge and a level of synthesis reflecting an outstanding marriage of theory with practice. The committee hereby recognizes the student’s level of distinction in meeting the standard. CRITERIA UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE EXEMPLARY RATING 2. Application of content from a leadership perspective to a pertinent organizational issue. The student shows little linkage of scholarly content to contemporary leadership practices. The committee hereby recognizes the student’s failure to meet the standard. The student provides a pertinent issue for consideration, coupled with a thoughtful, comprehensive treatment of the matter through viable academic content and a leadership perspective. The committee hereby recognizes the student’s success at meeting the standard. The student is highly creative and comprehensive in articulating a leadership issue and utilizes a thorough application of academic content. The committee hereby recognizes the student’s level of distinction in meeting the standard. CRITERIA UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE EXEMPLARY RATING 3. Professionalism as an educational leader representing The University of Montana. The student’s use of language is limited or incorrect, or his/her demeanor/affect/attire is unprofessional. The committee hereby recognizes the student’s failure to meet the standard. The student’s level of professionalism demonstrated via standard English usage, polished demeanor, and appropriateness of attire reflects the targeted levels of the profession and program. The committee hereby recognizes the student’s success at meeting this standard. The student is articulate, polished and uses formal English in a manner reflecting the highest standards of professionalism. As such, the student is hereby recognized with distinction by the committee.
Mirowski, P and Plehwe, D eds. (2009) The Road from Mont Pelerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective, Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press Mitchell, T (2002) Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity, Berkeley: University of California Press Moran, M (2003) The British Regulatory State: High Modernism and Hyper-Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press Naím, M (2013) The End of Power: From Boardrooms to Battlefields and Churches to States, Why Being in Charge Isn’t What it Used to Be, New York: Basic Books Osborne, G (2010) Mais Lecture: A New Economic Model, 24th Feb 2010 Oxfam (2014) Wealth: Having it all and Wanting More, at: PAC (2013) Tax Avoidance: The Role of Large Accountancy Firms, London: Public Accounts Committee, HC 870 Palley, T (2013) Financialization: The Economics of Finance Capital Domination, London: Palgrave Macmillan Piketty, T (2014) Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge Mass., Harvard University Press Pliatzky, L (1989) The Treasury Under Mrs Thatcher, Oxford: Basil Blackwell M (1997) The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification, Oxford: Oxford University Press Power, M (2004) The Risk Management of Everything: Rethinking Politics and Uncertainty, London: Demos Pratten, C (1993) The Market, Occasional Paper 59, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Quiggin, J (2010) Zombie Economics: How Dead Ideas Still Walk Among Us, Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press Reeves, R and Cleary, H (2009) The Culture of Churn for UK Ministers and the Price we all Pay, London: Demos Richards, D (2008) New Labour and the Civil Service: Reconstructing the Westminster Model, Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan Rose, N (1991) ‘Governing By Numbers: Figuring Out Democracy’ in Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 16, No. 7, pp 673-92 Schnyder, G and Wilson, J (2014) ‘The Structure of Networks: The Transformation of UK Business, 1904-2010’ in David, J and Westerhuis, G eds. The Power of Corporate Networks, New York: Routledge, pp 31-47
Scott, J (1979) Corporations, Classes and Capitalism, London: Hutchinson Scott, J (2014 [1991] Who Rules Britain? Cambridge: Polity Sennett, R (2006) The Culture of the New Capitalism, , Press Shiller, R (2000) Irrational Exuberance, Princeton NJ: Slater, D (2002) ‘Capturing Markets from the Economists’ in du Gay, P and Pryke, M eds. Cultural Economy, London, Sage Strathern, M ed. (2000) Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy, London: Routledge Thain, C and Wright, M (1995) The Treasury and Whitehall: The Planning and Control of Public Expenditure, 1976-1993, Oxford: Oxford University Press Toynbee, P and Walker, D (2010) The Verdict: Did Labour Change Britain?, London: Granta Tsingou, E (2015) ‘Club Governance and the Making of Global Financial Rules’ in Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp 225-56 Wedel, J (2009) Shadow Elite: How the World’s New Power Brokers Undermine Democracy, Government and the Free Market, New York: Basic Books
(A&P Respiratory) (Med-Surg I Respiratory) Opens swollen airways Theophylline Side effects include restlessness, nervousness, increased pulse rate drinks / foods containing caffeine / chocolate If inhalation, give before inhaled steroids (A&P Circulatory) (Med-Surg I Cardiovascular) Causes vasodilation & decreases nerve conduction through the heart. Used to treat hypertension, angina & arrhythmias Norvasc (amlodipine) (A&P Nervous) (Med-Surg III Neurological) Treats narcolepsy & as adjunctive treatment in the management of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Colony Stimulating Factor – Text book resource (A&P Circulatory) Immune) Increases the production of cells Neupogen (filgrastim) (A&P Circulatory) (Med-Surg I Immune) Decreases inflammation Suffix of generics ends in sone Decadron (dexamethasone), Prednisone (prednisone), Solu-Medrol (methylprednisolone) Decreases body’s immune response, increasing infection risk – monitor temp, WBC’s Increases blood sugar levels – monitor Take large dose in AM – taper off drug – do not stop abruptly If inhalation – rinse mouth to prevent thrush If topical- use sparingly (A&P Circulatory) (Med-Surg I Cardiovascular) Increases urinary output to decrease circulating volume. Often used for patients with heart failure. Since fluid loss – monitor weight Aldactone (Spironolactone) - Potassium Sparing Lasix (Furosemide) - Potassium Depleting Monitor potassium levels Encourage potassium rich foods (bananas, oranges) (A&P Reproductive) (Med-Surg II Reproductive) Treats hormone imbalances, contraception, infertility, anemia & cancer Oral contraceptives – Antibiotics decrease effectiveness Epogen (epoetin) – Stimulates production of RBC’s Synthroid (levothyroxine) - Used to treat hypothyroidism
Worksite History: Please check (√) If You Have Ever Worked In or Around the Following Activities: Chemical Chemistry Laboratory Coke Oven Construction or Demolition Cotton, Flax, or Hemp Mill Electronics Plant Farm or Agricultural Flour or grain dust operation Foundry Hazardous Waste Industry Hospital or Health Care Lumber Mill Metal Production Mine (underground or open pit) Nuclear Industry Paper Mill Pharmaceutical Plastic Production Pottery or Ceramics Mill Refinery Rubber Processing Plant Sand Pit or Quarry Sand Blasting Service Station Shipyard or Boat-Building Smelter industry Chemical Exposure History: Please check (√) If You are now exposed to or have ever worked with: Acids or Caustics Alcohols or glycols Arsenic Artificial Butter or other Flavors Cadmium Carbon Disulfide Carbon Tetrachloride Chlorine or Hypochlorite Chloroform Chromates Chromic Acid Mist Cutting Oils DDT Dioxin Dust Coal Dust Sandblasting Dust Other Epoxy Resin Ethylene Dibromide Ethylene Oxide Explosives or Blasting Extreme Heat or Cold Fiberglass Formaldehyde or Glutaraldehyde Fumigants (including vikane) Glycol ethers Heptachlor Hexachlorobenzene Isocyanates (TDI, MDI) Lead Loud or Continuos Noise Mercurey Methylene Chloride Microwaves, Lasers Nickel Paint or varnish PCB’s Perfumes Pesticides or Herbicides Petroleum Phenol Phosgene Plastics Radioactive Materials Roofing Materials Rubber Silica, Sand, or Rock Dust Solvents/Degreasers Soots or Tars Spray Painting Styrene or Urethane Talc Toluene Tri/ Perchloroethylene Two-Part Glues or Sealants Vehicle or Diesel exhaust Vinyl Chloride Welding fume or gas Xylene Is there something you were exposed to that you are concerned about that is not listed here? Yes___ No ___ Please provide details for all checked boxes:
2.1.2 ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION ON VEHICLES 2015 Apr 1 Balance b/d 2.2 ASSET NOTE ON 31 MARCH 2016 VEHICLES EQUIPMENT Carrying value – 1 April 2015 Cost Accumulated depreciation (100 000) (70 000) Movements Additions at cost Disposals at carrying value Depreciation Carrying – 31 March 2016 Cost
Salaries 940 000 + [6 680 + 1600 + 90 + 630]* = R949 000  operation (9 000) 2 * Alternative calculation for gross salary: (630 x 100/7) OR (90 x 100) Insurance 12 000  - 4 500  = R7 500  operation; any one part correct [6 000 x 9/12] Audit fees 30 000  + 40 000  = R70 000  operation; any one part correct Directors fees 23 000  + 30 000 = R53 000  operation; any one part correct OR 68 000  - 15 000  = R53 000  (50% x 30 000) operation; any one part correct 2.2 Khaya Traders Ltd Income Statement for the year ended 31 December 2014 Operating Profit 232 750 Interest Income  (2 140 + 900) operation, one aspect correct  3 040 Profit before Interest Expense operation  235 790 Interest Expense (178 000 - 37 800 - 160 000) operation, one aspect correct  (19 800) Profit before Tax operation  215 990 Income Tax ignore bracket  (32 250) Net profit Tax operation 183 740 Total Marks 45
ASSETS Non-Current Assets operation  1 999 400 3 /Tangible Assets 1 939 400 Financial Assets: Fixed Deposits: LBW Bank (150 000- 90 000) 60 000 Current Assets operation  463 034 14 Inventories (121 000 + 3 790)  124 790 Trade and Other receivables operation, one part correct [64 900 - 2 596 + (197 000 - 190 400 ) ]  68 904 Cash and Cash Equivalents (90 000 + 175 540 + 3 800) Check that deposit is reduced by 90 000; operation  269 340* TOTAL ASSETS operation  2 462 434 EQUITY AND LIABILITIES Shareholders' Equity operation  1 646 014 3 Ordinary Share Capital see 3.2.1  1 300 000 Retained Income see 3.2.2  346 014 Non-Current Liabilities 422 890 4 Mortgage Loan: AB Bank (455 230 + 54 660 - 87 000) operation, one part correct Check that Loan is reduced  422 890 Current Liabilities operation  393 530 6 Trade and Other payables (71 230 + 15 300 + 220 000) 306 530 Current portion of loan (may be included in payables) that loan has been reduced by this  87 000 EQUITY AND LIABILITIES operation  2 462 434 Foreign entries -1 (max -2) Presentation / Placement / Incorrect or incomplete details -1 (max -2) Total Marks 50 QUESTION 4 (This question consists of 3 INDEPENDENT questions)
7.3 Calculate the amount of VAT payable to OR receivable from SARS on 28 February 2015. (You may draw up a VAT Control Account to assist you in your calculations) (335 502 x 14 /114) VAT Input: 41 202 + 6 440 + 1 168 = R48 810 (Dr) VAT Output: 34 160 + 350 + 1 190 = R35 700 (Cr) (244 000 x 14%) (9690 - 8 500) OR (8 500 x 14%) VAT amount: 2 850 + 35 700  - 48 810  (see calculations above) = R10 260 receivable from SARS  check operation + comment OR
Stampfer MJ et al.14 1986 RCT 33 volunteers Randomised to aspirin 325mg, one of two EC aspirin preparations 325mg, or placebo. Tablets were taken every other day Bleeding times, platelet aggregation and TXA2 levels before and after a single dose, and after seven doses Plain and EC aspirin were equally efficacious in prolonging bleeding time, inhibition of platelet aggregation and suppression of TXA2. Short study time of 7 days. Alternate day dosing used. No indication of actual clinical outcomes of participants
networking, Intelligence and Computing Technologies (ICNICT-2011), KIET,Ghaziabad, U.P. Chaudhary Deepa, Yadav Praveen 2012, ”Integrated Knowledge Base: an Approach to Knowledge Extraction”, International conference, ICNICT, 2012, KIET, MTU, Noida. …………………………………………………………………………………………….
Keywords Online retailers, ethics, customer loyalty, customer perception, security, reliability, and Caribbean. 1.1 Introduction The internet has emerged as a viable alternative channel to physical retailing. Through the internet, marketers can realize lucrative business opportunities worldwide. In this regard, the internet is a widely used medium that acquires and delivers information and services to customers and business. It is perpetually transforming the way people and businesses interact with each other. With such transformation, impressions of expressed ethical conduct by both parties are now at the forefront. Bricks and mortar stores may be able to signal longevity and ethical behavior by external factors such as their location or by the behaviors and attitudes of their employees. These characteristics are not present in virtual companies which offer online purchase options (Romain, 2007).
6-week summer training in ASP.Net at Aptech Computer Education, in 2011. Underwent 4-week summer training in Core Java at NIIT, Solan in June-July 2010. Computer Skills OPERATING SYSTEM: WIN-XP, WIN-VISTA, WINDOWS 7, WINDOWS 8. SOFTWARE PROFICIENCY: C, C++, Core Java. Experience S.NO COLLEGE DURATION From To 1. Assistant Professor at Eternal University, Baru Sahib, Distt. Sirmour (H.P) 7th August, 2015 Till Now Publication Neeru Bhardwaj, Meenal Sharma, “Optimal strategy for software testing”, International Journal of Advances in Computing and Information Technology(IJACIT), ISSN 2277–9140,April 2014. (MEENAL SHARMA)
Standard 9: Professional Collaboration. The teacher candidate has effective working relationships with students, families, school colleagues, and community members. 0-The teacher candidate does not possess the necessary knowledge, therefore, the standard is not evident or is incorrect in performance. 1-Emerging Candidate: The teacher candidate is able to articulate the necessary knowledge, but does not demonstrate in performance. 2-Developing Candidate: The teacher candidate is able to articulate the necessary knowledge and demonstrates in performance with some success. 3-Skilled Candidate: The teacher candidate is able to articulate the necessary knowledge and effectively demonstrates in performance. Expected level of performance by the end of the student teaching semester. 4- Exceeding Candidate: The teacher candidate adapts and develops the lesson according to the teaching environment/ student response (all descriptors in the skilled candidate (3) column must be met as well as at least one descriptor below): Resists participation in school-wide functions. Resists collaboration. Avoids communication with students, staff, and families. Fails to build rapport with students, staff, and families; including the cooperating teacher. Recognizes the importance of participating in functions, but does not attend. Recognizes the importance of collaboration, but does not fully participate. Recognizes the importance of communication to support student success, but does not implement communication strategies. Maintains limited relationships with students, staff, and families. Recognizes the importance of participating in functions and attends sporadically. Participates in collaborative meetings. Communicates with students, and families to support student success in alignment with expectations. Maintains appropriate relationships with students, staff, and families. Participates in school-wide functions to enhance student learning. Prepares for and fully engages in collaborative meetings to enhance student learning. Purposefully engages in positive, effective, and ongoing communication with students, staff, and families to support student success. Builds and seeks out positive, appropriate relationships with students, staff, and families. Volunteers to be a member of a school-wide committee. Collaborates with parents, colleagues, and/or community members for the benefit of students. Actively participates in school or district events to build a broad network of collaboration. Representative Indicator: 9.3 Cooperative Partnerships in Support of Student Learning
Standards and Quality Indicators Webmap The Missouri Educator Evaluation System contains thirty-six Quality Indicators across nine standards. In the Clinical Experience, each of the nine standards will receive one representative indicators are included for each standard. Thus, thirteen of the thirty-six Quality Indicators have been selected for assessing the performance of the Teacher Candidate. While all thirty-six Quality Indicators are important and addressed throughout the preparation process, these thirteen in particular (shown in blue) are an indication of the readiness of a Teacher Candidate for his/her first year of teaching. The Teacher Candidate is assessed on each of the nine standards with language specific to these thirteen indicators by the Ed Prep Supervisor and the Cooperating Teacher. The forms included in this process are explained to provide further detail on how this assessment occurs. Teacher Candidate Assessment Tool The Teacher Candidate Assessment Tool (TCAT) is a specifically designed evaluation tool used to assess Teacher Candidates, both formatively and summatively, throughout the culminating semester. The nine focus standards were selected from the Missouri Teacher Standards to evaluate Teacher Candidates similarly to the principal evaluations of first-year teachers. Formative evaluations using the TCAT provide opportunities for the Teacher Candidate to analyze their growth on a single standard over time. This promotes reflection, as well as conferencing and goal-setting with evaluators. Use of the Teacher Candidate Assessment Tool is optional, as EPPs may use their own electronic system to gather this data. When adjusting the format to meet each EPP’s individual needs, it is essential that the language of the standards, quality indicators, and descriptors remain unchanged to ensure consistency across the state.
Approval history Is there any previous pre-application advice or development approval, granted under the Integrated Planning Act 1997, the Urban Land Development Authority Act 2007, the Sustainable Planning Act 2009, the Planning Act 2016 or the Economic Development Act 2012 still in effect for the land? Yes No Attachments To support the request for a pre-application meeting, please attach plans, drawings, or reports. As a minimum, a scaled A3 plan detailing the proposed development must be attached. Description Date Privacy statement Information collected is subject to the Right to Information Act 2009 and the Information Privacy Act 2009. The information provided may be publicly released and or provided to third parties and other government agencies—but only for the purposes for which the information is being collected. The proponent's personal information will be stored on departmental files and may be disclosed for purposes relating to the processing and assessment of the application or as authorised or required by law. Terms A pre-application meeting is a service offered by EDQ informal discussions take place between an applicant and EDQ in regard to a proposed development in a priority development area based on information provided by the applicant. An applicant should not rely on EDQ officers to identify all areas of concern or relevance during a pre-application meeting, as further issues may arise during formal assessment once the application is properly made. The detail and level of advice provided by EDQ is dependent upon the level of detail provided by the applicant. Any changes to information provided by the applicant must be submitted to EDQ no later than 72 hours prior to the pre-application meeting to allow due consideration. Notes of the pre-application meeting will be provided to the applicant at the meeting completion or as agreed between the parties. Applicant’s declaration and acknowledgement
Psychiatric Medications (version 2012.1) Antipsychotics Antidepressants Mood stabilizers anxiolytics/hypnotics Stimulants Miscellaneous oldest thorazine old haloperidol/Haldol perphenazine/Trilafon newest olanzapine/Zyprexa risperidone/Risperdal quetiapine/Seroquel ziprasidone/Geodon aripiprazole/Abilify specialty (clozapine/Clozaril) bupropion/Wellbutrin SRI’s fluoxetine/Prozac sertraline/Zoloft citalopram/Celexa escitalopram/Lexapro fluvoxamine/Luvox Dual duloxetine/Cymbalta venlafaxine/Effexor desvenlafaxine/Pristiq mirtazapine/Remeron for sleep trazodone/Desyrel doxepin/Sinequan Tricyclics amitriptyline/Elavil nortriptyline desipramine imipramine MAOI’s tranylcypromine phenelzine/Nardil selegeline/Emsam lithium divalproex/Depakote carbamazepine/Tegretol lamotrigine/Lamictal fish oil high-dose thyroid? Benzodiazepines diazepam/Valium chlordiazepoxide /Librium temazepam/Restoril lorazepam/Ativan clonazepam/Klonopin buspirone/Buspar Sedative/hypnotics zolpidem/Ambien zaleplon/Sonata eszipiclone/Lunesta methylphenidates short Ritalin Focalin Methylin medium Ritalin SR Metadate ER Methylin ER long Concerta Daytrana Metadate CD Ritalin LA amphetamines short Dextrostat Desoxsyn medium Adderall long Adderall XR Dexedrine spansules non-stimulants for ADHD atomoxetine/Strattera guanfacine/Intuniv guanfacine/Tenex desipramine modafinil/Provigil Other n-acetylcysteine/NAC tryptophan melatonin
Sanction or Approval Fee Right of First Refusal Adding a Meet to the Existing Schedule Meet Specifications Sanction Number Failure to Hold a Meet Referee Fine Observed Meets Requirements during an Observed Meet Post Observed Meet Requirements YMCA Meet Requirements PRE-MEET PREPARATION Page 14 Meet Staff Requirements Meet Notice Entry Forms Entry Guidelines Return Check Fee Limits Entry Order Unaccepted Entries Swimmer Eligibility Under-Subscription Meet Host Fees Meet Fees: Sanctioned, Approved, Observed
Patient Participation Group Meeting Thursday 18th May 2017 Minutes Present: Jean Atherton, Martin Brown, Linda Little, Susan Lea and Lynne Morrall Apologies – Debbie Coppock Chairperson – nominations Jean Atherton agreed to become chairperson with help from Linda Little. Minutes of last meeting read and approved Matters raised Triage Caring Together GP Service Specification Assurance Report. AOB Date of next meeting 5. Matters Raised Text Messages Question – could the practice send out bulk text messages to patient’s with information? Unfortunately the practice cannot send individual text messages as they would be charged. Lynne will find out if there is any chance of this changing in the future (maybe using a different company that supplies the service)MJOG is the one used at the moment. Waiting Room Information Boards Jean reiterated that the waiting area was too cluttered with information on all the etc. and asked if there could be a dedicated information board this may help patients see the
Meeting Subject / Title Subcommittee meeting Meeting Date 25 May 2016 Meeting Time 2:00 - 3:00 pm Meeting Location 1500 Jefferson Building, Meeting Room 2322 (no visitor’s pass required) Meeting Participants Donges, Waterstrat, Kentfield, Hazzard, Ufford Next Meeting AGENDA Item Description Lead Time 1 Review the minutes of the last meeting Donges 5 minutes 2 Review the revised statement of work with the team Donges 20 minutes 3 Review the proposed data collection form for use by the team Donges 20 minutes 4 Plan for next meeting and agenda Team 5 minutes 5 Plan for the status update at the June 14th full committee meeting Team 10 minutes Meeting notes and observations Agenda Item Notes Tasks or things to follow up on from 5/4/16 Item # Task description Assigned to Est. Due Date 1 Distribute SOW to subcommittee membership for review and feedback. Mark 5/12/2016 2 Distribute proposed dependency collection form for 2016 to subcommittee membership for review and feedback. Mark 5/12/2016 3 Distribute minutes of the meeting to subcommittee membership for review and feedback. Mark 5/12/2016 4 Prepare a status briefing on the subcommittee’s activities to be presented at the June 14th full committee meeting. Mark, et al. 5/26/2016 5 Set up the next meeting date and location Mark 6 Develop the agenda for the next meeting Mark 7 Distribute the next agenda to subcommittee members Mark
James Gillespie’s High School Parent Council Meeting Tuesday 20th March 2018 Draft minutes Present: Donald Macdonald – DM (HT), Jeff Warden - JW (DHT), Ian Porter – IP (DHT), Lorna Sweeney – LS (Schools and Lifelong Learning Service Manager, City of Edinburgh Council), Ailsa Macintosh – AM (Chair), Graeme Davis - GD (Communications), Julie-Ann Sime - JAS (Treasurer), Shelagh Shields -SS (Events), Fiona Denvir, Alistair Philip, Stuart Robertson, Kevin Gallagher, Bruce Crawford, Charles Garland, Connie Smith, Ruth Tiplady, Pamela Billina, Alison Macleod, Charles Warlow, Karen Burke, Ros Ingle, Penny Tarsia, Mari Primrose, Tanya Potter, Anna Christal – AC (Secretary) Apologies: Elke Versmessen, Cynthia Berry and Karen Finlayson 1. Welcome and minutes of last meeting (23rd Jan. 2018) AM welcomed everyone, especially Lorna Sweeney, Schools and Lifelong Learning Service Manager, City of Edinburgh Council. The minutes of the last meeting on 23rd January 2018 were approved. 1.1. Actions completed/carried forward 1.1.1 (1.1.4) Invitation to CEC representative to discuss capacity and accommodation AM reported that she has invited representation, but this will be for a later meeting – see item 3.3. 1.1.2 (2) Viewing meals selected on Parent Pay AM noted that Chris Ross, Catering Manager for City of Edinburgh Council, has been put in contact with the parent that raised this issue. 1.1.3 (2) Sharing information and FAQ about biometrics for catering services Chris Ross forwarded FAQ and information about system. These documents have been shared on the JGHS Parent Council website at:
James Gillespie’s High School Parent Council Meeting Tuesday 29th May 2018 minutes Present: Donald Macdonald – DM (HT), Deirdre – DB (DHT), Allan Crosbie – ACr (EiS representative and Curricular Leader for English), Ailsa Macintosh – AM (Chair), Graeme Davis - GD (Communications), Julie-Ann Sime - JAS (Treasurer), Elke Versmessen – EV (Fund-raising), Shelagh Shields - SS (Events), Fiona Denvir, Ros Ingle, Penny Tarsia, Congrong Dai, Robbie McVeigh, Jennifer Rodger, Karen Finlayson, Amelia Beattie, Melanie Main, Alison Platts, Tanya Potter, Anna Christal – AC (Secretary) Apologies: Cath Downie, Charles Warlow - CW, Cynthia Berry 1. Welcome, apologies and minutes of last meeting (20th March 2018) AM welcomed everyone. The minutes of the last meeting on 20th March 2018 were approved 1.1. AM to write and thank Lorna Sweeney, Schools and Lifelong Learning Service Manager, City of Edinburgh Council for presentation about WiFi at last meeting Completed 1.2. AM, GD and CW to consider option to visit Tynecastle HS Option to visit Tynecastle HS has been considered.
Open Data Advisory Group – Winter Meeting 10:00 – 12:00 Meeting called by: 10:00-10:15 Coffee, administrative and technology time 2331 10:15 – 10:35 Legislative review Open Data in Building Codes Public Records bills Privacy Bills 2331 10:35 – 11:00 Review of Open Data plans List of published Open Data plans Details / common features OCIO Reporting / / 11:00 – 11:30 Looking forward Open Data Policy renewal Open Data guidance edits , Additional Information: Going forward, all Open Data Advisory Group materials will be posted on the OCIO website (). We will be using this membership list to manage announcements ()
Meeting Agenda 5/12/2018 10:00 am to11:30 am Coon Rapids Center – Recreation Room Call to order 10:00 am Attendance: Deb Zepeda, Evans, Kate Gambino, Nick Kopp, Jackie Fabel, Melissa Bright, Michelle Paine, Susie Griffith, Todd Dusosky, , Brian Beedle, Jill Robinson, Shannon Scarrella, Karl Woerle and Dana Gibson. Not in attendance: Jenni Gallipo, and Mike Snicker Assignment of time keeper – Michelle Paine Approval of agenda – Approval of previous meeting(s) Minutes – April Board Meeting Minutes President –Field Update (State Tournaments), CR United Tournament, Closed Session (Player Update), Concessions and LuAnn Compensation, Communication between CR and City of CR (Maintenance Department and Parks/Rec Department), Park and Red Board Meeting, May 14th, President’s and State Cup 2019, and NLS and CR United Talks. Vice President – Marketing Strategies Treasurer – (10 Min). – Financial Report Rec Committee - (15 min) – Recreational registration numbers and meeting summary Competitive Committee – (15 min) Registrar – (10 min) Fundraising Committee (10 min) Tournament Committee (10 Min) Volunteer Director – (10 Min) Marketing Director – (10 Min) Uniform Director – (10 Min) Director of Coaching (15 min) Old Business – New Business / Open Floor – Next Board Meeting – June 16th or 17th – Civic Center Motion to Adjourn
Meeting Agenda 8/26/2018 7:00 pm to 8:30 pm Coon Rapids Civic Center – Rec Room Call to order 10:00 am Attendance: Deb Zepeda, Brian Evans, Kate Gambino, Nick Kopp, Jackie Fabel, Melissa Bright, Michelle Paine, Susie Griffith, Todd Dusosky, , Brian Beedle, Jill Robinson, Karl Woerle, Jenni Gallipo, Mike Snicker, Shannon Scarrella and Dana Gibson. Not in attendance: Assignment of time keeper – Michelle Paine Approval of agenda – Approval of previous meeting(s) Minutes – July Board Meeting Minutes President – Annual Meeting September 16th at Center, Concessions Vice President –Competitive Information, Concessions Treasurer – (10 Min). – Financial Report Rec Committee - (15 min) – Recreational registration for fall Competitive Committee – (15 min) Registrar – (10 min) – Fundraising Committee - (10 min) Tournament Committee - (10 Min) – Fall Tournament Volunteer Director – (10 Min) Marketing Director – (10 Min) Uniform Director – (10 Min) Director of Coaching (15 min) –Tryouts, Team Formations Webmaster – GC App/Website Old Business – New Business / Open Floor – Next Board Meeting – September 16th. Civic Center, Annual Meeting (7 to 8pm), Elections Motion to Adjourn
So accept “lurkers” until they become disruptive. Boot Camp Agenda and lead. – Herb to organize. Students – Chan to work on scholarship application form. Kay to work out a mechanism to accept corporate donations to a scholarship fund for students. Companies that contribute to the fund get to review and accept the students. Companies should send candidate universities and professor contact information to Chan. Companies that decide that they want certain universities/students present need to indicate that and donate to the fund. Network Infrastructure testing NIST set of questions from January 18, 2017 Who is bringing clocks… 61850-9-3 and C37.238 2011. C37.238 2017 a possibility. External determination Time Inaccuracy – yes it will be tested Holdover testing – probably yes NIST to provide detail about usage of IOP Information desire. Kay will check about government rate in our block or rooms. SCL Testing Testing Ideas Is it possible to mention explicitly test cases including ENTSO-E requirements on SCL: information exchange between functions ; virtual IEDs ; telecommunication network configuration; ... This is of course depending on the WG10 and Jörg TF progress but there are probably already some possibilities ... Time Sync Testing Will be facilitated by Bernhard Baumgartner (bernhard.baumgartner@omicron-lab.com). Action Items Creation Date Item Needed by Closed 17-11-2016 Everybody who have UCA IDs, get them and send them to Herb.