zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Motion passed 6-0 Discussion regarding the lights along the main street in St. Johns. No action was taken. Discussion regarding the electric issues at the BUB. No action was taken. Discuss the next abatement project and the maintenance of the Leverton property. No action was taken. Discuss monthly newsletter and the distribution. No action was taken. CITY MANAGER REPORT PAVING PROJECT RODEO STANDS SHADE CDBG BEGINS SOON CHIP SEAL LITTLE COLORADO RIVER CITY POLICE CHIEF REPORT No report was given. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Lights and post for the main street. Councilman Hancock Road projects. City Manager Ramsey Abatement. Councilman Lindsey Possible Executive Session. Councilman Lindsey Job description for Public Works. Councilman Lindsey Codes – The City Council night needs to be changed. Councilman Hancock. Mr. Hinton commented that is says in the Code that it is Thursday night or the night that is chosen by Council. ADJOURNMENT Motion was made by Vice Mayor Spence Udall to adjourn the meeting. Motion was seconded by Councilman Tony Raykovitz. Motion passed 6-0 Meeting adjourned at 7:20 p.m.
PERSON SPECIFICATION JOB: Legal Adviser LOCATION: Headquarters Remember only the information contained in this document is used to advertise, short list and for selection at interview. Any criterion included within either the essential or desirable elements must be objectively justifiable in order to avoid direct or indirect discrimination. Essential Desirable Experience & Knowledge Skills & competencies required. E.g. Geographical knowledge of the area, familiarity with certain legislation. Ability to present cases / applications in the Magistrates’ and County Court (Advocacy) Proven experience of civil and/or criminal law Proven experience of commercial law matters. Experience of researching and interpreting complex areas of law. Experience of drafting Court papers/documentation. Experience on interviewing witnesses and drafting witness statements. Experience in briefing counsel. Relevant experience in a Solicitor’s office/Chambers dealing with commercial law and civil or commercial litigation since obtaining practising certificate or demonstrable experience. Legal experience within the public sector and preferably within the Police Service. Experience of presenting cases/applications in the Magistrates’ and County Court (Advocacy) Ability to present cases in courts/tribunals. Ability to supervise and train others and monitor staff performance. Education & Training General education Specialist training Educated to degree level in law or a relevant subject or Graduate member of CILEX (or a demonstrable competence together with a willingness to undertake such training). Successfully passed Law Society Finals or Legal Willingness to undertake training/further training if required.
CASE ACTIVITIES AND COSTS INFORMATION: # # Part 1b - Costs To-Date (pre contract costs) – IMPORTANT!! this is only necessary if you have attended in two different courts and therefore two different prescribed rates have been applied. # WORK COSTS (all figures exclusive of VAT) # # Provide Justification here for ANY enhancement applied: - Profit Costs # # Activity Number of hours/items Prescribed Rate Applied Enhancement Applied Total cost # Preparation/Attendances # Routine Telephone Calls # Routine Letters Written # Routine Letters Received # Conf/Hearings with Counsel # Travel Waiting # Advocacy # Have you submitted a CIVCLAIM 1 for pre-contract costs? TOTAL PROFIT COSTS # YES / NO COUNSEL’S FEES # DISBURSEMENTS # TOTAL COSTS TO DATE
Part 2 - Future Overall & Staged Costs – all figures exclusive of VAT KEY EVENTS & DATES WORK TIME ESTIMATE IN HOURS SOLICITOR COSTS STAGE ONE SOLICITOR COUNSEL DISBURSEMENTS Rates Applied The outstanding work is identified as follows (detail individual activities) Estimated Solicitor Hours Please provide estimates for counsel's fees under FGF/FAS scheme for each hearing or event, if this case escapes the FGF/FAS scheme please attach a full breakdown of counsel's fees. Please provide estimates of any disbursements to be incurred. Please also indicate how these are to be apportioned. (In respect of profit costs the prescribed rate and the enhancement (if any) applied to each activity – in respect of counsel’s fee the graduated fee for each function but please provide separately a CIVCLAIM5 showing how the fee has been calculated) Rates Enh (%) Total Rates Enh (%) Total Rates Enh (%) Total
KEY EVENTS & DATES WORK TIME ESTIMATE IN HOURS SOLICITOR COSTS STAGE ONE (Cont..) SOLICITOR COUNSEL DISBURSEMENTS Rates Applied Rates Enh (%) Total Rates Enh (%) Total Rates Enh (%) Total Rates Enh (%) Total Number of hearings and advocates meetings
KEY EVENTS & DATES WORK TIME ESTIMATE IN HOURS SOLICITOR COSTS STAGE TWO (Cont..) SOLICITOR COUNSEL DISBURSEMENTS Rates Applied Rates Enh (%) Total Rates Enh (%) Total Rates Enh (%) Total Rates Enh (%) Total
KEY EVENTS & DATES WORK TIME ESTIMATE IN HOURS SOLICITOR COSTS STAGE TWO (Cont..) SOLICITOR COUNSEL DISBURSEMENTS Rates Applied Rates Enh (%) Total Rates Enh (%) Total Rates Enh (%) Total Rates Enh (%) Total Number of hearings and advocates meetings
Experts Fees subject to VAT - Clarify expert type, apportionment and whether based in London or outside Hourly Rate Total Cost Pre- Agreed? Sub Total VAT Total Expert Fees not subject to VAT Clarify expert type, apportionment and whether based in London or outside Hourly Rate Total Cost Pre- Agreed? Total Please indicate in the right-hand column if these costs have been agreed, either by prior authority or in a previous case plan.
ensuring that the office is up and running by 9.30. The post requires working as the workload dictates and very occasionally this may require working later than 5.30. Job share is considered. There are weekly lunchtime staff meetings, which all members of the firm attend. Holidays are 23 days plus Bank Holidays and discretionary days. Salary is negotiable, according to market rates, and the post holder’s expectations and experience. We anticipate that the starting salary would be £20,000 - £23,000. Salary reviews take place in March each year. DEIGHTON PIERCE GLYNN SOLICITORS – APPLICATION FORM PLEASE RETURN BY – Wednesday 28 March 2018. Position applied for: Legal Assistant/Paralegal – City office Return completed form to: DPG Recruitment - Employment or volunteering history – in date order most recent first. Please mark with a “V” any work that was unpaid. Dates to and from Employer / Organisation Job title and main duties/responsibilities Reason for leaving Average Hours worked per week
Aboriginal Law All Library Collections (2015) Free Electronic Resource (link): (2006) Small Collections Medium Collections Large Collections (2015) Free (2016) Free (2017) Free 2017) Free (2012) $134.00 (2016) $120.00 (2016) $134.00 (2017) $100.00 (2013) $109.00 Abuse and Victims of Crime All Library Collections (2013) Free (2016) Free (2015) free (2017) Free Electronic Resource (link): (2016) Small Collections (2015) Free Electronic Resource (link) (2013)
Employment & Labour Law All Library Collections (2014) Free Small Collections Medium Collections Large Collections (2015) $24.95 (2014) Free (2016) $81.00 (2007) $82.00 (2015) $165.00 Family Law All Library Collections (2013) Free (2013) Free Small Collections Medium Collections Large Collections (2013) Free (2015) Free (2016) Free (2015) $65.00 (2015)$315.00 (2013) $210.00 (2015) $98.00 (2015) $122.00 General Legal Reference All Library Collections
Large Collections (2013) $85.00 Privacy & Access to Information All Library Collections Electronic Resource (link): (2015) (2014) Small Collections Large Collections (2016) $16.95 Electronic Resources (link): (2015) (2012) (2013) $149.00 Rights and Citizenship All Library Collections Electronic Resource (link): (2008) Small Collections Medium Collections Large Collections (2013) $12.99 (2013) $60.00 (2014) $55.00
jayne smith SOLICITOR Address 123, The Street Topletown Nottingham NG1 234 Phone 01234 567890 07456 018123 Email jaynesmith@gmail.com Admitted 2001 PGDipLaw (LPC) University of London 1995 - 1999 Bachelor of Laws LL.B University of Reading 1991 - 1994 4 A Levels including Law (A, A, A, B) West Notts College 1989 – 1991 Going to the gym Swimming Hiking Cycling I am a Partner at a Midlands law firm, seeking a fresh challenge within a regulated law firm. I am interested in joining a smaller firm where I can use my proven skills and experience to grow the property department as I have in previous positions. ABC Law Firm | Partner 2001 – date Heading up the Residential Conveyancing department, I oversee a team of 15 paralegals in dealing with sales, purchases, remortgages and plot sales. From joining the firm in 2001, the department has grown to handle more than £20 million of transactions each calendar year. This was partly achieved through overhauling our website and partly through introducing an online conveyancing portal. Here is a key achievement. Here is a key achievement. Here is another key achievement. 123 Law Firm | Solicitor 1999 – 2001 I was a solicitor in the property department dealing with a busy workload of residential conveyancing transactions. I also mentored new members of the firm joining the property department, acting as a go-to person. NRB Law Firm | Trainee Solicitor 1997 - 1999 I completed my training contract with NRB Law Firm, covering several areas including Residential and Commercial Conveyancing. XYZ Law Firm | Paralegal 1994 - 1997 I worked as a paralegal in the Civil Litigation department, processing claims, completing forms and keeping clients updated with their case. As a partner I am required to give 3 months’ notice in my current position although this might be negotiable. References are available on request.
Please Type or Print all information and use additional sheets if necessary. Grantee Name: Grantee Address: Documents Requested By: ________________________________ ___________________ Name Title Documents Will Be Executed By: ________________________________ ___________________ Name Title Grant Year: Spring - 20___________ Fall - 20____________ Date of Award Letter: MM/DD/YYYY Beginning Date of Grant Term: MM/DD/YYYY Instructions If the acquisition has already occurred, submit the Legal Documents Request Form (LDRF) to THDA prior to the request to draw down grant funds. Legal documents must be in place before grant dollars may be drawn down. If TN HTF funds are being used at closing, submit the LDRF at least 2 weeks prior to the closing date. List each address that TN HTF funds will go into and specify the amount of the grant going into each property. Address # 1: Street: City: County: Zip Code: TN HTF Amount Going into Address # 1: Address # 2: Street: City: County: Zip Code: TN HTF Amount Going into Address # 2:
Assessments should normally be face to face, not just by telephone or a questionnaire posted to you that you cannot discuss with the assessor. The Care Act guidance suggests that in very straightforward cases it may be reasonable to have an by telephone, however this is unlikely to be appropriate for ILF users. Although assessors need not be qualified social workers the statutory guidance emphasises that they must be ‘appropriately trained’ and (para 6.88) that if an ‘assessor does not have the knowledge of a particular condition or circumstance, they must consult someone who has relevant expertise’. It is important therefore to raise any concerns about the lack of expertise / ability of the assessor at an early stage if this appears to be the case. If there is a possibility that you have other types of needs in addition to social care, such as healthcare or housing then the assessor should recognise this and proactively make referrals and cooperate with other professionals and agencies, to make sure they carry out appropriate assessments promptly, and work jointly to plan and meet your needs. This is particularly relevant for ILF users many of whom may have complex health needs and may need an assessment of eligibility for fully NHS funded continuing healthcare, or for a combined package of health and social care jointly funded by the NHS and local authority. The assessment should also gather information from carers, family or others who can help give information about your needs (if you agree to this). You should also be given a chance to speak to the assessor separately from your carers or family if you want to, and the same for your carers if they want to, so they can discuss their own needs as a carer. If family members or others are providing care free of charge, then it is very important to document through the assessment process the extent to which the carer is willing and able to continue providing such voluntary care (if at all), and also whether the person being cared for wants to continue with that arrangement. Disabled adults should not be forced into accepting free care from family or others if they do not feel that it meets their needs so as to promote their well-being and independence. Nor should family members
Legal Internship: Expression of Interest Semester 1 2017 Please complete this form and add your CV for submission as one single document. STUDENT DETAILS Full Name Student ID Email address Contact number (preferably mobile) Address HAVE YOU PREVIOUSLY UNDERTAKEN LEGAL CLERKSHIPS OR LEGAL WORK EXPERIENCE? (Please tick as appropriate) If yes, please provide details, including the name of the organisation /s and the nature of the work undertaken (maximum 200 words). HAVE YOU PREVIOUSLY UNDERTAKEN OTHER WORK OR WORK EXPERIENCE (FOR EXAMPLE ASSOCIATED WITH YOUR UNDERGRADUATE DEGREE)? (Please tick as appropriate) Yes No
INVOICE Bill From Name: ____________ Company Name: ______________ Street Address: _______________ City, ST ZIP Code: ______________ Phone: ________________ Bill To Name: ________________ Company Name: ______________ Street Address: _______________ City, ST ZIP Code: ______________ Phone: ________________ Invoice No. ___________ Invoice Date: ________ Due Date: ________ Description Quantity Rate Fees ($) Total ($) Subtotal Sales Tax Other Total Terms and Conditions Thank you for your business. Please send payment within ______ days of receiving this invoice. There will be a ______% per ______ on late invoices. Please Choose a Payment Type
New Module Form Essential Information Required for Module Manager ACADEMIC YEAR 2014-15 Module Detail Title Legal opinion or advice (maximum 50 characters) Description In this module you will be centrally involved in submitting an opinion or advice to a national, regional or international body. The body may be governmental (e.g. the Law Reform Commission), non-governmental (e.g. Amnesty International) or intergovernmental (e.g. Council of Europe, EU or UN). The opinion/advice may include an amicus curiae intervention before a domestic, regional or international court or adjudicative body. (brief description of the content of the module between 75 – 150 words) *Note Field to indicate taught through Irish/English/Erasmus The opinion or advice is to be provided in the English language Course Instances (s) 1SPC1, 2SPC1, 3SPC1 (Year 1, 2 or 3 of the Structured PhD Programme of the College of Business, Public Policy and Law) Module version number and date approved * xx/xx/2012 xx/xx/2012 xx/xx/2012 Date Retired Module Owner / Lecturer LW6101 Module Administrator Details Please specify main contact person(s) for exam related queries and contact number /email Module Code LW/// (Office use only) Module Type Core= Student must take the module Optional = Choice for Student Optional for Core for ECTS Multiple of 5 ects Course Requirement Pass or Fail (i.e. where a module has to be passed at 40%) Semester Taught Semester Examined Requisite(s) Co-Req. If they take module X they must take module Y Modules ⁭ Pre-Req The student must have taken and passed a module in previous year Modules ⁭ Excl.Req. If they take module X they CANNOT take module Y Modules ⁭ Module Assessment 1st Sitting 2nd Sitting Assessment Type Submission of legal opinion/advice and preparation of report, reflecting on experience Exam Session Duration
Utilitarian would critique Kantianism: Accommodating individual rights can limit the greater overall happiness or benefit of the whole society, and therefore should be limited. NO CASE ACCORDING TO UTILITARIANISM What is law? The law is the function of the principle of utility or cost/benefit analysis to provide the greatest amount of good/happiness to the community or general welfare. What makes law legitimate? - Why do we follow It/ Where is the authority from? Law is seen as legitimate from the cost/benefit analysis – as it is a medium to “weigh” or “balance” to advance the general welfare or social good. What theories does your theory critique and why? Critiques Kantianism. Equality over liberty – individual rights should be curbed for the greater welfare
reasonable efforts to correct the misunderstanding. The lawyer shall not give legal advice to an unrepresented person, other than the advice to secure counsel, if the lawyer knows or reasonably should know that the interests of such a person are or have a reasonable possibility of being in conflict with the interests of the client. C. LAWYER AS WITNESS - RULE 3.7 Overview Scenario: other side seeks lawyer’s disqualification PP: concern that jury will get confused, and maybe attribute more weight to what lawyer says while wearing both hats N: does NOT apply to pre-trial work! Takeaway: do NOT jump to conclusion that just because lawyer knows something about the case, they are a necessary witness; rather, info must be material DJ Investment Group look at substantial hardship in light of the complexity of the issue, and the size of the file new lawyer will need to gain proficiency with. Imputation example: partner X’s testimony will be adverse to client, thus Rule 1.7 imputes conflict to partner Y I: if counsel opposite calls lawyer to stand, may set higher bar for disqualification, b/c looks like trial maneuvering I: Privilege if client calls lawyer to the stand, have WAIVED privilege “A lawyer shall not act as advocate at a trial in which the lawyer is likely to be a necessary witness UNLESS: The testimony is to an uncontested issue; The testimony relates to the nature and value of legal services rendered in the case; or Disqualification of the lawyer would work substantial hardship on the client.” A lawyer may act as advocate in a trial in which another lawyer in the lawyer’s firm is likely to be called as a witness unless precluded from doing so by Rule 1.7 or Rule 1.9 (NO imputation). X. Self Regulation A. RESTRICTIONS ON RIGHT TO PRACTICE - RULE 5.6 Overview GR: can NOT restrict working after termination of relationship. Rule 5.6(a). Exception: can agree to forfeit retirement benefits, but can NOT forfeit pension accrued over time. PP (Comment 1): combating limits to professional autonomy, and supporting the ability of clients to chose their lawyer A lawyer may not agree to restrict his right to practice as part of the settlement of a case. Rule 5.6(b) Need client’s informed consent under Rule 1.2 A lawyer SHALL NOT participate in offering or making:
Recruiting Agency/Name Contact Number Email Address /Contact Form Website Contact Form Taylor Root Legal & Compliance Recruitment 020 7415 2828 Laurence Simons 020 7645 8500 Hudson 0121 633 0010 Douglas Scott Legal Recruitment 0203 846 3071 BCL Legal Recruitment 0845 241 0933 Shilton Sharpe Quarry 020 7187 7400 Law Absolute Recruitment Specialists 0207 092 8000 Recruitment for Solicitors 01494 483728 EJ Legal 0207 400 2000 HAYS Recruiting Experts Worldwide 020 3465 0139 Axiom Law 020 7324 5300 Simply Law Jobs 01772 639033
Minter Ellison Lawyers 8 8 6 Sparke Helmore 8 8 6 Ashurst 6 6 6 DLA Piper 5 5 6 King & Wood Mallesons 2 (not in top ten legal service providers 2014–15) 3 Mills Oakley Lawyers 2 (not in top ten legal service providers 2014–15) (not in top ten legal service providers 2013–14) HWL Ebsworth Lawyers 2 2 (not in top ten legal service providers 2013–14) Corrs Chambers Westgarth 2 2 3 Other 14 16 11 Figure 10: Legal services providers by percentage of Commonwealth legal work 2015–16
Professional Fees Addisons $0.00 Aitken Partners $0.00 Allen & Overy $0.00 Allens $0.00 Allygroup Pty Ltd $0.00 Arete Group $0.00 Arnold Bloch Liebler $0.00 Ashurst $0.00 Atanaskovic Hartnell $0.00 Australian Business Lawyers and Advisors Pty Ltd $0.00 Australian Government Solicitor $27,975.35 Baker & McKenzie $0.00 Balazs Lazanas & Welch $0.00 Banki Haddock Fiora $0.00 Bartier Perry $0.00 Beaumont Law $0.00 Bird & Bird $0.00 Bowden McCormack $0.00 Bradley Allen Love Lawyers $0.00 Brown Wright Stein Lawyers $0.00 BT Lawyers $0.00 CBP Lawyers (formerly t/as Colin Biggers & Paisley) $0.00 Chamberlains Law Firm $0.00 Church & Grace $0.00 Clayton Utz $59,205.00 Clifford Chance $0.00 Clyde & Co $0.00 Cooper Grace Ward Lawyers $0.00 Cornwall Stodart $0.00 Corrs Chambers Westgarth $0.00 Cozens Johansen Lawyers Pty Ltd $0.00 Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers $0.00 Culshaw Miller Lawyers $0.00 Curwoods Lawyers $0.00 Davis Faulkner & Co $0.00 De Mestre and Company $0.00 Davis Faulkner & Co and Lawyerbank (formerly t/as DFC Legal) $0.00 DibbsBarker $0.00 DibbsBarker Canberra $0.00 DLA Piper $0.00 DW Fox Tucker Lawyers $0.00
As pricing information is deemed to be commercially sensitive, this will only be issued to participating bodies with an undertaking of 9.0 Contract Management The Client’s business area/location representative will be responsible for day-to-day management and supervision of services. This will apply to Other Public Bodies, who are accessing the Framework directly. DSO’s Contract Management Team shall be carrying out this service on behalf of the Core Departments/Agencies. All contracts should be managed in line with PGN 01/12 Contract Management Procedures and Principles and those requirements laid out in the Specification of Requirements, and the Standard and Supplementary Conditions of Contract where necessary. CPD will be responsible for managing the overarching Framework Agreement to ensure all Organisations are satisfied with the services provided, and the Contractor is performing well throughout the duration of the Framework Agreement. CPD will collect management information on work allocated through the Framework Agreement. The information will be requested from suppliers every six months for publication on the DoF website. CPD will offer support and advice post contract award: at agreed review dates; or
INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY COURSE OUTLINE Kulliyyah / Institute Centre for Foundation Studies Department / Centre Laws Programme Law Foundation Name of Course / Mode Introduction to Legal Skills Course Code LAF 2133 Name of Academic Staff/ Instructor(s) Mdm. Mizan Muhammad () Mr. Mahyuddin Daud () Rationale for the inclusion of the course/module in the programme This course is a core course required for the Law Foundation programme as specified by Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws, International Islamic University Malaysia. Introduction to Legal Skills is designed to provide elementary academic and practical skills for law foundation students. The skills include research, reading, analysing and writing. Semester and Year Offered Semesters I and II Status Core Level Foundation Proposed Start Date Semester 1, 2013 / 2014 Batch of Student to be Affected Intake 2011/2012 onwards Student Learning Time (SLT)
8 5. EXAMINATION SKILLS 5.1 Methods in answering examination questions:- 5.1.1 Multiple Choice 5.1.2 Short Answer 5.1.3 Problem Solving 5.1.4 Essay 4 (Williams, 2002, chap. 10) (Fafinski, 2011, chap. 14 and 15) 9, 10,11 6.PRACTICAL SKILLS (PART 1) 6.1 Writing Skill 6.1.1 Argumentative Essay 6.2 Speaking Skill 6.2.1 Public Speaking 6.2.2 Debate 12 (Tepper, 1995, chap. 7) (Skinner, 2004, chap. 1, 4, 16 and 17) (Chapman, 2000, chap. 1 – 5) (Williams, 2002, chap. 11) 12, 13 & 14 7. PRACTICAL SKILLS (PART 2) 7.1 Mock Trial 7.1.1 What is ‘Mock Trial’ 7.1.2 Scriptwriting 7.1.3 Steps to conduct Mock Trial 12 END OF SEMESTER EXAMINATION
Required references supporting the course Chapman, J. (2000). Interviewing and Counselling (2nd ed.). London: Cavendish Publishing Ltd. Fafinski, E. F. and S. (2011). Legal Skills. (3, Ed.) (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Skinner, G. L. G. and J. F. (2004). Mastering Public Speaking (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon. Tatham, E. H. and L. (2006). Successful Legal Writing (1st ed.). London: Sweet & Maxwell. Tepper, P. R. (1995). Legal Writing Skills (1st ed.). Glencoe Publishing Co. Williams, G. (2002). Learning the Law (12th ed.). London: Sweet & Maxwell. Yaqin, A. (2007). Legal Research and Writing (1st ed.). Malaysia: LexisNexis. Recommended references supporting the course Chapman, J. (2000). Interviewing and Counselling (2nd ed.). London: Cavendish Publishing Ltd. Tatham, E. H. and L. (2006). Successful Legal Writing (1st ed.). London: Sweet & Maxwell. Tepper, P. R. (1995). Legal Writing Skills (1st ed.). Glencoe Publishing Co. http://www.mcgeorge.edu/documents/academic_support/Legal_Skills-Week2.pdf http://www.lib.jjay.cuny.edu/research/brief.html
98760-42743 71. Sh. Satish Chaudhary R/o H.no. 104, GH-4, Sector-6, MDC, Panchkula, Mobile no. 098142-11620, Email Id:- P/848/1992 35 dt. 13.09.17 72. Sh. Amandeep Singh Jattana Office:- H.no. 6371-B, Rajiv Vihar, Manimajra, Chandigarh, Mob. No. 98150-03385, Email Id:- aman_jattana_gill@yahoo.in P/1914/2001 35 dt. 13.09.17 73. Sh. Vaibhav Narang House no. 139-140, M.S. Enclave, Dhakoli, 99140-17000, , P/1302/2006 46 dt. 27.10.17 74 Sh. Rajeev Kawatra House No. 203, Sector 4,MDC Near Mansa Devi Mandir, Panchkula (134109), Mob. No. 098156-00462, Email:- P/489/2089 44 dt. 11.10.17 75 Sh. Jagdev Singh Bhandohal Room No. 11, New Bar Complex, Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh, R/o No. 1399, Sector 68, SAS Nagar, Mob. No. Email:- P/672/1990 50 dt. 15.11.17 JUNIOR ADVOCATES Name of Counsel (SarvShri/Smt.) Address with Phone No. Enrollment No. Office Order & date 1. NimanyuGautam 1047, Sector 12-A, Panchkula P/1275/2007 28 dt. -
98880-83261, Emai id:- 86 Sh. Rajat Bansal R/o -House No. 659/12, Panchkula, Mob. No. Email:- P/1665/2009 51 dt. 20.11.17 87 Sh. Amanpreet Singh R/o -House No. 133, Sector-16, Chandigarh, Office- # 1008, Sector-8, Chandigarh, Mob. No. 98769-80048, 70872-75505, Email:- P/1406/2015 52 dt. 30.11.17 88 Sh. Sunny K. Singla R/o -House No. 4332, Sector-68, Mohali, Chamber no. 46, New Lawyer’s Chambers, P & H High Court, Chandigarh, Mob. No. 98557-79931. Email:- P/1072/2011 55 dt. 04.12.17 89 Sh. Navandeep Singh Matta R/o - House No. 5, Ajit Nagar, Patiala-147001, Mobile No. 95996-71149, 99998-53905, Email:- D/1913/2015 56 dt. 04.12.17 DELETED Name of Counsel (SarvShri/Smt.) Address with Phone No. Enrollment No. Office Order & date 1. Amit Sharma 127, B-Sunny Enclave, Kharar, Distt. Ropar M.N. 9915486127, 9216486127 P/428/2002 33 dt. 20.11.2013 2 Mrs. Tina Garg # 3279, Sector 15D, Chandigarh. M.N. 9356401000 garg_tina15@yahoo.co.in P/1534/2009 15 dt. 21.5.2014 3 Sh. Amarjeet Singh R/o # 395, Street no. 03, Ward no. 07, Near DAV, Campus, Malout, District Sri Muktsar Sahib(Punjab) P/1610/2009 O/O no. 32 dated 19.08.16
Wiltshire, Elaine. “Committed to Climate Change”, The Lawyer’s Weekly 29:30 (11 December 2009) (QL). (iii) Newspapers & newswires (McGill guide 6.16) Author, “title of article”, newspaper (date) page electronic source (if applicable). Bill Curry, “PM, premiers work out deal on aboriginal health care”, The Globe and Mail (26 November 2005) A4 (CPI.Q). Betsy Powell, “Hells Angels acquitted on organized crime charges”, The Toronto Star (4 July 2011) online: The Toronto Star <http://www.thestar.com>. “Ottawa eyes six new Supreme Court Judges”, Canadian Press (25 November 2005) (QL). Moira Welsh, “Abducted boy alive”, The Toronto Star (2 August 2006) A1. The footnotes would look like this (the first is a print example; the second is from a website): Moira Welsh, “Abducted boy alive”, The Toronto Star (2 August 2006) A1. Betsy Powell, “Hells Angels acquitted on organized crime charges”, The Toronto Star (4 July 2011) online: The Toronto Star <http://www.thestar.com>. “Ottawa eyes six candidates in search for new Supreme Court judge”, Canadian Press (25 November 2005) (QL). The bibliographic entry for a resource with a listed author would look like this: Powell, Betsy. “Hells Angels acquitted on organized crime charges”, The Toronto Star (4 July 2011) online: The Toronto Star <http://www.thestar.com>. (iv) Editorials and Letters to the Editor (McGill guide 6.16.1) Author, “title of editorial”, style of document, newspaper (date) page electronic source (if applicable) “Accountability Begins at Home”, Editorial, The New York Times (21 November 2005 online: The New York Times <http://www.nytimes.com>. Ken Lum, Letter to the Editor, The Vancouver Sun (6 December 2004) A10.
Prompt Title: Should the sale and use of marijuana be legalized throughout the U.S.? Grade Level: Ninth Grade ELA Writing Standard(s) Writing Standard 1: Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or texts using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence. Content Standard(s) Health Standard 3: Students will demonstrate health-promoting and risk-reducing behaviors to prevent substance abuse. Text(s) X Written ☐ Audio ☐ Visual Source U.S. News & World Report, Health Care. Title Marijuana’s Public Health Pros and Cons by Thomas Strouse, M.D.. Insert Link Here x Written ☐ Audio ☐ Visual Source EBSCOHost Middle School Title Marijuana: The Blunt Truth Written X Audio ☐ Visual Source National Public Radio: Shots: Health News from NPR Title Marijuana's Health Effects? Top Scientists Weigh In. By Patti Neighmond Writing Prompt After reading the supporting texts and listening to the radio piece on the legalization of marijuana, write an argumentative essay in which you argue for or against the legalization of marijuana throughout the United States. Support your position with evidence from the texts. Scoring Rubric See Authored by Tori January
Appendix 2 - Revision History Revision Date Editor Changes Made [01] [09 May 2014] [Monica Palmirani] [Creation] [02] [1 July 2014] [Monica Palmirani] [Inclusion of fragment of text] [03] [17 July 2014] [Monica Palmirani] [Inclusion of fragment of text] [04] [05 August 2014] [Monica Palmirani] [Updating of the paragraph 4.2.1, 4.2.3, 4.2.4, 4.2.5.] [05] [12 August 2014] [Tara Athan] [Updating of the paragraph 5.2., 5.3., 5.4.] [06] [2 October 2013] [Guido Governatori] [Updating of paragraph 4.1, 4.1.1, swapped order between Deontic (4.1.2 )and Constitutive/Prescriptive (4.1.3), updated new 4.1.2] [07] [2 October 2013] [Monica Palmirani] [Accepted all the revisions] [08] [2 October 2013] [Monica Palmirani] [Accepted all the revisions. Revised 4.2.6 and 4.2.7] [09] [7 January 2015] [Guido Governatori] [5.1 part: Modelling Legal Norms] [10] [7 January 2015] [Adam Wyner, Tara Athan] [revision and comments] [11] [12 January 2015] [Monica Palmirani] [consolidation and editing] [12] [12 January 2015] [Guido Governatori] [refining some little part] [13] [12 January 2015] [Guido Governatori, Adam Wyner, Tara Athan, Monica Palmirani] [refining some little part] [14] [09 March 2015] [Guido Governatori, Adam Wyner, Tara Athan, Monica Palmirani] [refining part concerning the metadata] [15] [2 July 2015] Monica Palmirani [including parts] [16] [9 July 2015] Monica Palmirani, Tara Athan [including parts] [17] [15 July 2015] Adam Wyner [refining] [18] [17 July 2015] Monica Palmirani, Tara Athan [including parts]]
Appendix 2 - Revision History Revision Date Editor Changes Made [01] [09 May 2014] [Monica Palmirani] [Creation] [02] [1 July 2014] [Monica Palmirani] [Inclusion of fragment of text] [03] [17 July 2014] [Monica Palmirani] [Inclusion of fragment of text] [04] [05 August 2014] [Monica Palmirani] [Updating of the paragraph 4.2.1, 4.2.3, 4.2.4, 4.2.5.] [05] [12 August 2014] [Tara Athan] [Updating of the paragraph 5.2., 5.3., 5.4.] [06] [2 October 2013] [Guido Governatori] [Updating of paragraph 4.1, 4.1.1, swapped order between Deontic (4.1.2 )and Constitutive/Prescriptive (4.1.3), updated new 4.1.2] [07] [2 October 2013] [Monica Palmirani] [Accepted all the revisions] [08] [2 October 2013] [Monica Palmirani] [Accepted all the revisions. Revised 4.2.6 and 4.2.7] [09] [7 January 2015] [Guido Governatori] [5.1 part: Modelling Legal Norms] [10] [7 January 2015] [Adam Wyner, Tara Athan] [revision and comments] [11] [12 January 2015] [Monica Palmirani] [consolidation and editing] [12] [12 January 2015] [Guido Governatori] [refining some little part] [13] [12 January 2015] [Guido Governatori, Adam Wyner, Tara Athan, Monica Palmirani] [refining some little part] [14] [09 March 2015] [Guido Governatori, Adam Wyner, Tara Athan, Monica Palmirani] [refining part concerning the metadata] [15] [2 July 2015] Monica Palmirani [including parts] [16] [9 July 2015] Monica Palmirani, Tara Athan [including parts] [17] [15 July 2015] Adam Wyner [refining] [18] [17 July 2015] Monica Palmirani, Tara Athan [including parts]]
Tara Athan [45] [19 October 2016] Monica Palmirani, Guido Governatori Tara Athan Refinement of the conformance rules. [46] [26 October 2016] Monica Palmirani Inserted the HTTP links, correct <Overrides> typos, inserted the referecenes into the text. [46] [26 October 2016] All Editing [47] [28 October 2016] Monica Palmirani Folder of material, links check [48] [24 April 2017] All Implementation of the public review comments
DAAS CONTACTS: , Legal Services Developer Phone: 919-855-3427 Email: Kathryn Lanier, Section Chief Phone: 919-855-3429 Email: Jennifer Powell, Lead Monitor Phone: 919-855-3448 Email: LEGAL ASSISTANCE PROVIDER INFORMATION List your legal assistance providers contact information, the counties they are responsible for, the funding amount for each county, unit rate and monitoring history: If funding is not broken down by county, list the total amount for each legal assistance provider and the counties they cover. For each Title IIIB legal assistance provider please list: Legal provider name and street address Provider contract administrator contact information Counties in which services are provided d. Title IIIB funding per county e. Unit cost for each county For each Title IIIB legal assistance provider please: a. Provide the most recent monitoring dates for unit verification and program assessment. b. Explain how you monitor units and the legal assistance services without accessing identifying information.
a number of employee benefits and rights areas including: terms and conditions of employment and preparation of employee handbook holiday entitlement and Statutory sick pay (SSP) working time regulations National Minimum Wage (NMW) tax deductions and National Insurance Contributions (NICs) maternity, paternity and parental/carers’ rights harassment, dismissal and grievance procedures redundancy auto-enrolment pensions whistleblowing arrangements. advises managers, employ external HR consultants, or ensure that a lead member of staff is trained in employment law to provide this service for the organisation. Board members should have oversight of general terms and conditions of employment. They should receive confirmation that processes have been followed. Volunteers should be clearly distinguished from employees and appropriate policies established in relation to volunteer recruitment and management. Care needs to be taken not to create binding obligations. (free phone/email support) (NCVO guidance and links to NCVO member templates) HMRC, Tax and NI 32 The organisation is registered as an employer with HMRC (Employer Registration). Initial check that this is the case. (HMRC guidance) (Government guidance) 33 National Insurance Contributions are made and PAYE operated in accordance with requirements. Treasurer or appropriate staff member needs to confirm this to board meetings when discussing the annual accounts. Also covered through audit. (HMRC guidance) (HMRC guidance) (NCVO trusted supplier)
Delivery Summary B Physician Progress Notes B Diagnostic and Therapeutic Orders B Medication Reconciliation Form B Transfusion Sheets B Lab Results B Reference Lab Results B Radiology Reports B X-ray films/images, videos B EKGs: Electrocardiogram B Dictated Results B Mounted Strips B Echocardiogram Report B Stress Test Report B Pulmonary Function: Reports B Records (graphs, etc.) B Other Diagnostic Results B Therapy (Rehab): Initial Evaluation B Notes B Autopsy B Anatomic B MARs B Nursing Assessments & Notes B Transfer Forms B [name of clinic]: Physician Notes B Well Visit Forms B
Activity 5 – Asking for meaning What does ‘claimant’s name’ mean? What does ‘defendant’ mean? What does ‘brief details of claim’ mean? And what does ‘value’ mean? Transcript Activity 4 – Aleks and the librarian Aleks: Can you help me fill in this form? Librarian: What are you doing? A: I want to go to the small claims court. L: Why? A: My sister sent me some money in a cheque but I didn’t get it. It isn’t in my account. I think the prison have lost it but they say they haven’t. I want a judge to help me get the money back. L: OK, I can help you with the form. A: What does ‘claimant’s name’ mean? L: You are the claimant so put your name and address here. A: OK My name: Jin J-I-N Jun J-U-N Park P-A-R-K. How do you spell the address? L: The prison address is H-M-P Rye that’s spelt R-Y-E, West Hill, that’s spelt W-E-S-T- H-I-L- in York Y-O-R-K and the postcode is YO20 5TH A: Thanks. What does ‘defendant’ mean? L: That means the other person, not you – the person who has your money. In your situation that is the Ministry of Justice. Their address is 102 Petty France London SW1H 9AJ A: What does ‘brief details of claim’ mean? L: Brief means short. You need to write short details of the problem. A: OK. My sister sent me a £50 cheque in October but I didn’t receive it. Great. And what does ‘value’ mean? L: Value is how much money your sister sent you. A: Well, that’s £50. L: Good. Well you’ve only got a little bit more to fill in now.....
Resource 3 A 1. barrister a) he/ she helps the defendant not to go to prison because the magistrate find them not guilty 2. magistrate b) another name for defence lawyers and prosecutors who work in court 3. prosecutor c) he/ she does the crime 4. defence lawyer d) he/ she tries to make the defendant be found guilty 5. defendant e) he or she is like the judge and decides if he/ she is guilty B
LEGAL NOTICE TOWN OF OXFORD, CONNECTICUT REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS AND PROPOSALS RFQ/RFP# OSBC3 OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE SERVICES April 26, 2018 The Town of Oxford will receive sealed statements of qualifications and proposals (the RFQ/RFP) for owner’s representative services until 2:00 p.m. on May 14, 2018. The documents comprising the Request for Qualification/Proposal (the RFQ/RFP) may be obtained on the Town’s website, under “requests for Bids and on the State of CT Department of Administrative Services website The Town of Oxford reserves the right to amend or terminate this Request for Qualification and Proposal, to reject any or all respondents, to request additional information, to waive any informalities or non-material deficiencies in a response, and to take any and all other action that, in the Town’s sole judgment, will be in its best interests.
BID # UST-R-2018 LEGAL NOTICE TOWN OF CLINTON SEALED BIDS will be received until 10:30 a.m. May 14, 2018, at the Office of the First Selectman, Andrews Memorial Town Hall, 54 E. Main Street, Clinton, Conn. 06413 at which time they will be opened and read aloud for UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK REMOVALS AT FIVE LOCATIONS IN CLINTON. Bids received after the above date and time will be rejected. BID DOCUMENTS may be picked up at the following locations: Town of Clinton, Town Hall, 54 East Main St., Clinton, CT., Office of the First Selectman between the hours of 9:00 am. - 4:00 p.m. Monday thru Wednesday, 9:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. Thursday or 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 noon on Friday or by calling 860-669-9333. Documents may be downloaded at the Town of Clinton Website A non-mandatory pre-bid meeting will be held on April 23, 2018 at 10:00 am at the Clinton Department of Public Works Garage, 117 Nod Road Clinton CT 06413 THIS IS A PREVAILING WAGE JOB All questions are to be submitted by E-Mail to John Treichel at The First Selectman reserves the right to reject any, or any part of, or all proposals; to waive informalities and technicalities and to accept the Bid which the Town deems to be in the best interest of the Town, whether or not it is the lowest dollar amount. Christine Goupil First Selectman
Costs for different process for each motion or issue: Court Process Fees Time Lapsing Eldercaring Coordination Process Fees Time Lapsing Client notifies lawyer about concern (30 minutes) $150 Problem arises and EC is contacted—1 hour $75 to 200 divided among two feuding family members and elder One day Draft Petition or Motion (60 minutes) $300 to attorney At least two days Attorney preparation for hearing time—6 hours for each of three attorneys 4,800 to attorney 30 days between setting the hearing and the hearing occurring EC contacts other family members to address problem identified and schedules appointment—1 hour 75 to 200 divided among two feuding family members and elder Expert witness fees for court date: 1,500 45 days EC meets with family members to address problem—in person or remotely—1 hour 75 to 200 divided among two feuding family members and elder One week Pro Se family member prepare own case and witnesses—2 hours No additional time If attorneys attend the EC’s meeting with the family—1 hour meeting plus 1 hour travel x 3 attorneys $1800 Attending Hearing: attorney time $1800 One day Issue resolves---added to Elder Care Plan
including travel during the one hour meeting Draft Order $300 Two days Resolution implemented Opposing attorney review proposed Order $600 One week Follow up appointment with EC by attorneys necessary—30 minutes $37.50 to $100 divided among two feuding family members and elder One month Submit Order to Judge to enter One week Wait for signed order to come in the mail One week Follow up hearing to make sure decision was implemented—90 minutes of attorney time at $300/hour and three attorneys $900 One month Costs to go to court could be over $10,000 131 days $2,500 or less divided among family members. $700 divided among elder and family members; $1800 in attorney’s fees also divided among One week to problem resolution and one month to follow up appointment
process () and resulting population estimates can be imprecise because of the observation process (). Understanding factors leading to observation bias may help improve population estimates from these datasets. The Southern African Bird Atlas Project (SABAP) is probably Africa’s largest citizen science biodiversity data collection project (), focusing on distribution and relative abundance of birds in up to six countries of southern Africa. Resulting publications have provided a substantive basis for detailed conservation planning, policy development and management in the region (). Thus far two studies, which have examined how the index of abundance from this atlas (reporting rates) reflects local population abundance, have found that reporting rates were correlated with abundance (, ). Our study aims to explore correlates of detection for a set of birds from the Cape floristic region (Fynbos) in South Africa. The Fynbos is a hotspot renowned for its botanical diversity, and is home to six endemic passerines and one endemic turnicid (). Generally it is considered to have low bird biodiversity (), but the endemic species are of conservation concern especially due to threats resulting from alien vegetation encroachment, landscape conversion and climate change (, ). While many of these species live in hard to access mountain locations, the region has been well covered by atlasing efforts. Through a standardized distance sampling survey undertaken across the region, we have the unique opportunity to compare atlas reporting rates to bird densities accounting for correlates of detection. In the paper we aim to identify how species’ characteristics and behaviour influence detection rate in a point count survey. We hypothesize that larger, colourful, vocal species more tolerant of human presence and habitat modification will be those reported most frequently. Likewise, more common species, i.e. those occurring at higher densities, should be reported more frequently. We then examine how the citizen science atlas reporting rates correlate with density estimates calculated from the same survey area and use what we have learnt to create a model that allows prediction of bird density and population size from SABAP2 data.
Legends of the West Bike & Car Fest June 13 & 14, 2014 Downtown Carson City JUNE 2014 MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY 2 3 4 5 6 7 Wine Walk (Downtown) 8 Pops Party Concert (Gov’s Mansion) 9 10 11 12 13 14 Flag Day Legends of the West Bike & Car Fest / CCSO 11th Annual Extreme Motor Officer Training Challenge (Downtown) 15 Father’s Day Stewart Father’s Day Powwow (Stewart Indian School) 16 17 18 19 20 21 Taste of Downtown (Downtown) 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Run What-Cha-Brung (Fuji Park) 29 30
United Nations CCPR/C/113/D/1937/2010 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Distr.: General 15 May 2015 Original: English Human Rights Committee Communication No. 1937/2010 Views adopted by the Committee at its 113th session (16 March–2 April 2015) Submitted by: Mansour Leghaei and others (represented by Joanne Kinslor) Alleged victims: The author, his wife and four children State party: Date of communication: 16 April 2010 (initial submission) Document references: Special Rapporteur’s rule 92 and 97 decision, transmitted to the State party on 21 April 2010 (issued in document form) Date of adoption of Views: 26 March 2015 Subject matter: Expulsion to the Islamic Republic of Iran Procedural issues: Insufficient substantiation; non-exhaustion of domestic remedies Substantive issues: Compelling reasons of national security; review of expulsion; discrimination on the ground of national origin; discrimination on the ground of other status; arbitrary interference with family life; best interest of the child. Articles of the Covenant: 2; 13; 17; 23; 24; 26 Articles of the Optional Protocol: 2; 5 (para. 2 (b))
Fill: None. Stroke: 0.25mm Dashed: 1.5m m 0.5mm C2 2 MY18 K0 Transparency: 60% Above ground railway line Layer name: Line - Above ground railway line Fill: None. Stroke: 2mm Solid C0 M0 Y0 K100 Above ground light rail line Layer name: Line Above ground light rail line Fill: None. Stroke: 1mm Solid C0 M93 Y79 K1 Below ground light rail line Layer name: Line Above ground light rail line Fill: None. Stroke: 0.353mm Dashed: 1.7mm 0.7mm C0 M93 Y79 K1 Separated cycleways line Layer name: Line Cycleways line Fill: None Stroke: 1.5mm Solid C85 M10 Y100 K10 Parkland shoreline line Layer name: Line Parkland shoreline line Miscellaneous lines Layer names: Line – Miscellaneous Line Line – Wall and cliff line Line – Viaduct area and line Map Metadata Data Source: City of Sydney Property Map and Cadastre Map Projection: Map Grid of Australia (MGA) Zone 56 Datum: GDA94 Scale: 1:2,250
Label blockouts Font varies Layer name: Text Label blockouts Font size: Varies, Horizontal scale: 100% Fill: C0 M0 Y0 K0. Transparency: 100% North point Layer name: Text – North point Suburbs and localities label 67 Frutiger Bold Condensed Layer name: Text Retail areas Font size: 40pt & 36pt, Horizontal scale: 100% Fill: C0 M0 Y0 K100 Transparency: 100%. Stroke: None
January 20 Mea Draw Bradi Bailer Brennan Shepherd Aaron Stang Austin Lubarsky January 27 Meat Draw Logan Febrey Jordon Willlox Cole Boarer Jordan Boisvert February 3 Meat Draw Donavin Bussey James Carter Bradi Bailer Brennan Shepherd February 10 Meat Draw Logan Febrey Sam Beaupre Braden Hees Jordan Willox February 17 Meat Draw Cole Boarer Joel Bevan Darian Young Austin Lubarsky