zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Competition Score Card TEAM NAME JUDGE Presentation UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT MEETS EXPECTATIONS EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS REMARKABLE RESEARCH How well did the team apply research (qualitative or quantitative) to their approach? POSITIONING & TARGETING How well did the team show an understanding of the target market with clear brand positioning? CREATIVITY / INNOVATION How strong was the team’s idea and did they demonstrate out of-the-box thinking in their creative execution? MEDIA PLAN Was the budget efficiently allocated and the strategy appropriate to the creative? GENERAL QUALITY Overall, how would you rate the Presentation? PRESENTATION SCORE /25 Plan Books UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT MEETS EXPECTATIONS EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS REMARKABLE PROBLEM SOLVING How well did the team address the needs of the client in the brief? CREATIVITY / INNOVATION Did the team demonstrate out-of-the-box thinking in their creative execution? MEDIA PLAN Was the budget well planned and was the media strategy well communicated? GENERAL QUALITY Was the budget well planned and was the media strategy well communicated? PLAN BOOK SCORE /20 TOTAL SCORE (PLEASE TALLY)) /45
De la Peña, Matt. We Were Here. Random House Inc., 2009. Eugenides, Jeffrey. The Virgin Suicides. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1993. Plath, Sylvia. The Bell Jar. Heinemann, 1963. Salinger, J. D. The Catcher in the Rye. Little Brown and Company, 1951. Vizzini, Ned. It’s Kind of a Funny Story. Hyperion, 2006.
hypothesis of a unit root (c=0). The results are presented in Table 1 below. The table highlighted that all variables real imports, GNI, Domestic Price, Import Price and Simple Average Tariff are integrated in order one, I(1). This means that they are stationary in their first difference. Insert Table 1a, 1b and 1c here the ADF test were undergone, the author went on to the vector error correction model. Before the modelling could be done, for the Johansen method, it is crucial to specify an appropriate lag length for the VAR. For all of the eight subsectors, 2-year lag length was the most appropriate. As for the trace test, for each different sectors the cointegration ranking differs. Table 2 below, shows the Johansen test for cointegration and the appropriate lags chosen for each of the eight sub sectors. Table 3 presents the normalised cointegrating equation estimate for all of the subsectors. Insert Table 2a-h, here Insert Table 3a-h, here In the next step, error correction model was estimated. The rank is set to 1, which is the default number of the error correction terms. An error correction model was estimated to examine the long run behaviour of Malaysian imports (according to their 8sectors). The lagged residual from the Johansen Cointegration Equation was included the dynamic general ECM. The general equation for ECM with 2 lag length is stated as below: ln Mt = b0 + b1i lnM t-2 + ln Yt-2+ lnIt-2 + lnDt-2 +lnTt-2 + b6 ECt-2 + error term (6) where EC is residual error derived from the cointegrating vector. This dynamic general equation is used separately for all the 8 sectors and presented in the next section.
Table 3: Status and Change Using Two Years of Longitudinal CELDT Data 5th Percentile Cut Points Status Level* Current Percent Proficient (Status) Change Change Level* 95 Very High 65.11 34.53 Increased Significantly 90 Very High 59.35 28.52 Increased Significantly 85 High 55.22 25.00 Increased Significantly 80 High 52.71 22.85 Increased Significantly 75 High 50.10 21.12 Increased Significantly 70 High 47.79 19.57 Increased Significantly 65 Medium 46.15 18.66 Increased Significantly 60 Medium 44.36 17.71 Increased Significantly 55 Medium 42.86 16.67 Increased Significantly 50 Medium 41.18 15.94 Increased Significantly 45 Medium 39.59 15.07 Increased Significantly 40 Medium 37.82 14.17 Increased Significantly 35 Medium 36.41 13.33 Increased Significantly 30 Low 35.14 12.26 Increased Significantly 25 Low 33.33 11.36 Increased Significantly 20 Low 31.49 9.93 Increased 15 Low 29.50 7.86 Increased 10 Very Low 27.15 5.83 Increased 5 Very Low 23.44 2.74 Increased
Date Title Estimated Number of Attendees Description April 26, 2018 Science Community of Practice 100 Provided an update on the California School Dashboard (Dashboard) and System of Support. May 3, 2018 Special Education Local Plan Area 75 Provided an update on DASS application process and on modified methods for DASS schools. May 10, 2018 49th Annual Juvenile Court, Community and Alternative School Administrators Conference 45 Provided an overview of the Dashboard and of the criteria and application process for DASS schools. Reviewed modified methods for DASS schools (CCI and one-year graduation rate). Reviewed how inclusion of DASS school data in 2018 Dashboard will impact county offices of education and their eligibility for Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) support. Reviewed Safety Net methodology for schools with small student populations (Graduation and Suspension Rate Indicators) May 16, 2018 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association (CCSESA) Career Technical Education Subcommittee 30 Provided an overview and next steps for developing future College/Career Indicators. Responded to technical questions from practitioners. May 16, 2018 Regional Assessment Network 20 Provided an update on the State Every School Succeeds Act (ESSA) Plan, including revised criteria for identifying schools for Comprehensive Support and Improvement (CSI) and Targeted Support and Improvement (TSI). May 17, 2018 CCSESA Curriculum and Instruction Steering Committee 75 Provided an update on recent SBE action related to the growth model and ongoing development of the Dashboard. May 17, 2018 Leroy Green Academy Parent Teacher Association Meeting 11 Conducted an in-person parent focus discussion on the usability of the Dashboard.
increase equitable access to the assessment. Accommodations may not fundamentally alter the comparability of test scores. (b) “Administration” means an eligible pupil's attempt to take any part of the ELPAC initial or summative assessment. (c) “Alternate assessment” is an alternate means, identified in an eligible pupil's IEP or Section 504 Plan, to measure English language proficiency. (d) “Annual summative assessment window” begins on February 1 and ends on May 31 of each school year. (e) “Designated supports” are resources that an eligible pupil regularly uses in the classroom for instruction and/or assessment(s) and that are available for use by any pupil for whom a need has been indicated, prior to assessment administration, by an educator or a team of educators (with parent/guardian and pupil input, as appropriate) or specified in the pupil's IEP or Section 504 Plan. (f) “Domain” means listening, reading, speaking, reading, or writing, as described in Education Code section 60810. (g) “ELPAC initial assessment criterion” means a performance-level cut score on the initial assessment that is at or above the State Board of Education (SBE)-approved definition of English language proficient. (hae) “ELPAC Ttest examiner” means an employee or contractor of an LEA or NPS who signs the ELPAC Test Security Affidavit, who is proficient in English and has complete command of pronunciation, intonation, and fluency, and who certifies that he or she has completed training in administration of the ELPAC. (ih) “ELPAC trainer” means an employee or contractor of a local educational agency (LEA) or nonpublic school (NPS) responsible for the annual training of ELPAC test examiners. (ji) “Excessive materials” means the difference between the total number of paper tests scored and 90 percent of the paper tests ordered annually by the LEA. (kj) “Grade” means the grade in which a pupil is enrolled at the time of testing, or if enrolled in an ungraded program, the grade to which the LEA assigns the pupil for assessment purposes.
review and revision, Board policy; Board minutes; Board liaison reports; and other matters of interest. The State Board has asked that this item be placed appropriately on each agenda. Fiscal Analysis (as appropriate) Not applicable. Attachment(s) Attachment 1: State Board of Education Draft Preliminary Report of Actions/Minutes for the May 9, 2018 meeting (18 Pages) may be viewed at the following link: .
Attachment 1: Summary Table California Education Code (EC) Section 56101 Waiver Number School District, School Period of Request District’s Request CDE Recommended Local Board Approval Date Penalty Without Waiver 3-4-2018 Los Alamitos Unified School District Requested: April 2, 2018, to June 30, 2018 Recommended: April 2, 2018, to June 30, 2018 To waive the Algebra I (or equivalent) graduation requirement for one student to receive a diploma of graduation Approval with conditions to waive the Algebra I (or equivalent) graduation requirement for one student to receive a diploma of graduation April 2, 2018 Failure to approve the waiver request would result in the student not meeting graduation requirements 1-4-2018 Pleasanton Unified School District Requested: April 2, 2018, to August 15, 2018 Recommended: April 2, 2018, to August 15, 2018 To waive the Algebra I (or equivalent) graduation requirement for one student to receive a diploma of graduation Approval with conditions to waive the Algebra I (or equivalent) graduation requirement for one student to receive a diploma of graduation March 27, 2018 Failure to approve the waiver request would result in the student not meeting graduation requirements Created by California Department of Education May 2018
California Department of Education Executive Office SBE-006 (REV. 1/2018) Child Specific NPA or NPS Certification California State Board of Education July 2018 Agenda Item #W-16 Subject Request by Tamalpais Union High School District to waive California Education Code Section 56366.1(a), the requirement for state certification to allow the uncertified out-of-state nonpublic school, Maple Lake Academy located in Spanish Fork, Utah, to provide services to one student with disabilities. Waiver Number 9-2-2018 Type of Action Action, Consent Summary of the Issue(s) The Tamalpais Union High School District (TUHSD) contacted certified schools (NPSs) in-state and three certified out-of-state residential treatment centers to offer a free and appropriate public education (FAPE) to one high school student who has significant social-emotional needs in conjunction with autism. None of these placement options would accept the student, or could meet the student’s comprehensive, unique needs. The Maple Lake Academy (MLA) is a residential treatment center located in Spanish Fork, Utah with a specialized program for girls with emotional disorders and verbal and non-verbal learning disabilities. The MLA provides a minimum of 20 hours per week of therapy and offers class sizes of five to seven students. The TUHSD requests to waive California Education Code Section 56366.1 (a), the requirement for state certification, to allow the use of state and federal special education funds for the placement of this student at MLA.
Attachment 1: Summary Table California Education Code Section 56366(d) Waiver Number District Period of Request District’s Request CDE Recommended Local Board and Public Hearing Approval Penalty Without Waiver Previous Waivers 9-2-2017 Tamalpais Union High School District (TUHSD) Requested: August 22, 2017, to July 31, 2018 Recommended: August 22, 2017, to July 31, 2018 To waive NPS certification to allow TUHSD to use state and federal special education funds for the placement of a student in an uncertified NPS Approval with conditions for the period requested February 6, 2018 The TUHSD may not use state and federal special education funds for the placement of the student at the uncertified out-of-state NPS None Created by California Department of Education May 2018
Attachment 1: Summary Table California Education Code (EC) Section 41402 Waiver Number District Period of Request District’s Request Bargaining Unit Representatives Consulted, Date and Position Local Board and Public Hearing Approval 35-3-2018 Shasta County Office of Requested: December 19, 2017 to June 30, 2018 Recommended: December 19, 2017 to June 30, 2019 A waiver for Danika Estes California School Employees Association Chapter #642 Debbie Stewart Chapter President 2/15/2018 Support A Public hearing was advertised in the local newspaper, “The Record Searchlight.” Local Board 3/14/2018 Support 36-3-2018 Shasta County Office of Requested: December 4, 2017 to June 30, 2018 Recommended: December 4, 2017 to June 30, 2019 A waiver for Tami Luce California School Employees Association Chapter #642 Debbie Stewart Chapter President 2/15/2018 Support A Public hearing was advertised in the local newspaper, “The Record Searchlight.” Local Board 3/14/2018 Support 37-3-2018 Shasta County Office of Requested: July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019 Recommended: July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019 A waiver for Jessica Walker California School Employees Association Chapter #642 Debbie Stewart Chapter President 2/15/2018 Support A Public hearing was advertised in the local newspaper, “The Record Searchlight.” Local Board 3/14/2018 Support Created by California Department of Education May 2018
Attachment 1: Summary Table California Education Code Section 33050 Waiver Number Local Educational Agency Period of Request Test Report(s) Missing Report Submitted School Year(s) Apportionment Amount Union Position 16-4-2018 Brentwood Unified Elementary School Requested: 7/1/2017 – 6/1/2018 Recommended: 7/1/2017 – 12/31/2017 California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Yes 2016–17 $24,717.00 Support 5-4-2018 Chaffey Joint Unified High School District Requested: 7/1/2017 – 12/31/2017 Recommended: 7/1/2017 – 12/31/2017 California English Language Development Test (CELDT) Yes 2016–17 $10,030.00 Support 25-3-2018 Covina-Valley Unified School District Requested: 3/1/2016 – 6/30/2016 Recommended: 7/1/2016 – 12/31/2016 CAASPP Yes 2015–16 $27,326.12 Support
8-3-2018 Monrovia Unified School District Requested: 7/1/2014 – 6/30/2015 Recommended: 7/1/2015 – 12/31/2015 CELDT Yes 2014–15 $7,715.00 Support 7-3-2018 Monrovia Unified School District Requested: 7/1/2014 – 6/30/2015 Recommended: 7/1/2015 – 12/31/2015 California High School Exit Examination Yes 2014–15 $2,496.40 Support 6-3-2018 Monrovia Unified School District Requested: 7/1/2014 – 6/30/2015 Recommended: 7/1/2015 – 12/31/2015 CAASPP Yes 2014–15 $10,258.98 Support 32-3-2018 Santa Clara Unified School District Requested: 7/1/2016 – 6/30/2017 Recommended: 7/1/2017 – 12/31/2017 CELDT Yes 2016–17 $21,365.00 Support
9-4-2018 Wright Elementary Wright Charter Requested: 7/1/2016 – 6/6/2017 Recommended: 7/1/2017 – 12/31/2017 CAASPP Yes 2016–17 $3,696.52 Neutral Created by California Department of Education May
Attachment 1: Summary Table California Education Code (EC) Section 41402 Waiver Number District Property Period of Request Local Board Approval Date Public Hearing Date Bargaining Unit Representatives Advisory Committee Consulted 1-5-2018 Pomona Unified School District 1425 E. Holt Avenue, Pomona, CA (the Tower Property) 550 N. East End Avenue, Pomona, CA (the East End Property) 2255 S. Garey Avenue, Pomona, CA (the Rio Rancho/Bonanza Property) 1300 N. Dudley Street, Pomona, CA (the Property) Requested: May 1, 2018 to April 30, 2020 Recommended: May 1, 2018 to April 28, 2020 4/18/2018 4/26/2018 Public Hearing Advertised: Posted on the District’s website, printed in the local newspaper, and posted on public locations within the jurisdiction. Associated Pomona Teachers Dorothy APT President 4/27/2018 Support California Service Employees Association Mariana Orozco, Chapter President 4/26/2018 Support Measure P Council 06/12/2018 Created by the California Department of Education May 8, 2018
Rationale: The entire section is to be waived because the District, in negotiating an agreement to sell the surplus properties, will not be accepting oral bids. Education Code § 17474. [In the event of a sale on a higher oral bid to a purchaser procured by a licensed real estate broker, other than the broker who submitted the highest written proposal, and who is qualified as provided in Section 17468 of this code, the board shall allow a commission on the full amount for which the sale is confirmed. One half of the commission on the amount of the highest written proposal shall be paid to the broker who submitted it, and the balance of the commission on the purchase price to the broker who procured the purchaser to whom the sale was confirmed.] Rationale:The entire section is to be waived because the District, in negotiating an agreement to sell the surplus properties, will not be accepting oral bids. Education Code § 17475. The final acceptance by the governing body may be made [either at the same session or] at any [adjourned] session [of the same meeting held within the 10 days next following.] Rationale:Modification of the section would remove the requirement that the governing board accept a proposal at the same meeting received, and would instead allow the governing board to consider proposals received and, as desired and appropriate, direct further negotiation. Attached is Resolution No. 26, which was adopted by the District's Board of Trustees on April 18, 2018, declaring its intention to sell and/or lease the surplus properties. A signed copy of the resolution is available upon request.
Client Information Except in cases of child/elder abuse or immediate danger to yourself/others, all information provided will be kept strictly confidential and released only in accordance with professional ethics and applicable law. Date Referred by Client Name M F Birth Date / / Parent Name (s) M F Birth Date / / M F Birth Date / / M F Birth Date / / M F Birth Date / / Sibling’s names/ages Others living in your home Address Street Apt. # City Zip Home phone Okay to leave message? Yes No Cell phone Email School Grade: School Performance (academic/behavioral): Excellent / Good / Fair / Poor School concerns: Current Concerns Check the areas which apply Depression Anxiety/Stress Relationships Eating issues Life Transitions Substance abuse Divorce Career School Grief Anger Abuse Family Parenting Spiritual issues Trauma Finances Health Insecurity Sexuality Suicidal thoughts What are the major concerns for which you’re seeking counseling for child? On a scale of 1 (mild) to 5 (severe), how would you rate child’s issues? 1 2 3 4 5 How long have these issues been a concern?
Scentsy Independent Consultant will receive the entire order and will sort/package each individual order. The individual orders will be delivered to Fundraiser Coordinator on a mutually agreed upon date, within three (3) weeks from the date Scentsy Independent Consultant receives all orders from the Fundraiser Coordinator. The organization will be responsible for final delivery of orders to each participant/customer. Scentsy Independent Consultant will provide Fundraiser Coordinator with copies of customer’s receipts and detailed information containing individual order totals and fundraiser profits. Fundraiser profits will be paid to the Fundraiser Coordinator on the 15th of the month following the conclusion of the fundraiser. A receipt for fundraiser donation will be provided to Scentsy Independent Consultant at the time in which payment/donation is given to Fundraiser Coordinator. Any/all unused catalogs, order forms, envelopes, instructions, etc. will be returned to Scentsy Independent Consultant at conclusion of fundraiser. For every Scentsy Home Party that is scheduled (as a result of this fundraiser), held and achieves a minimum of $400 in sales, your Scentsy Independent Consultant will donate an additional 10% of those sales to your organization. The person holding the party must inform the Scentsy Independent Consultant that the party is connected to your organization’s fundraiser. Scentsy Independent Consultant will provide proceeds to the Fundraiser Coordinator on the 15th of the month following the close of party(ies). Fundraiser Coordinator will provide receipt to Scentsy Independent Consultant for additional donations. Payment Methods Full payment is due on Order Due Date (as noted on Page 1). Please have all checks made payable to YOUR ORGANIZATION. Your organization will then cut one check for the entire sum payable to Tabetha Brown. If you are a Non-Profit/Tax-Exempt organization, you will be required to provide copy of tax-exempt certificate to Scentsy Independent Consultant. Additional payment method available is by customer’s Visa, MasterCard or American Express Credit/Debit card. Each credit card payment MUST include: Cardholder Name Full Credit/Debit card number Security Code (for Visa/MasterCard, this is the 3-digit code on the back of the card; for American Express, this is the 4-digit code on the front of the card) Expiration Date Billing Zip Code PHONE NUMBER Purchaser’s Signature Page 2 of 3
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN, Philadelphia, PA Director of Social Service, June 1995 – June 1999 This position required the administration of the department policies and clinical supervisor for all of the master level social workers and support staff, (language interpreter, secretarial and staff psychologist). The Department of Social Services aimed at providing support, education, case management and clinical intervention to all orthopedic and spinal cord injured children and their families during their stay in the hospital. Many parents resided at Shriners for many months while their children received treatment and relied on the services of the social work department to support them. As Director, I was also responsible for maintaining, developing and training staff on standards of practice. ALBERT EINSTEIN MEDICAL CENTER, Philadelphia, PA Pediatric/Medical-Surgical/Prenatal Social Worker – 1993-1995 As an in-patient clinical social worker, I provided case management and discharge planning for adult orthopedic patients and was the sole pediatric social worker in the hospital which included all pediatric trauma and emergency walk-ins and admissions. PHILADELPHIA CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER, Philadelphia, PA Family Therapist/Supervisor – 1985-1993 Following a year of internship at the Philadelphia Child Guidance Clinic, I was hired as a family therapist and continued to work in a newly created and innovative program that provided intensive home-based services for multi-problem and culturally diverse client population in Southwest Philadelphia, (Social Rehabilitation Program). Treatment included a combination of family and individual therapy, community resource allocation and collaboration with various local agencies. In 1987 I rose to a supervisory level and trained many master level students in home-based family therapy. FORREST HOSPITAL, Des Plaines, IL Psychiatric Technician – 1981-1983 Forest Hospital is a private psychiatric facility that admits both children and adults. As a Psychiatric Technician, I worked on a specialized adolescent unit for behavior disordered children, and received training to facilitate daily patient groups as well as weekly family and multifamily groups. Additionally, as part of the psychiatric team, I was responsible for a caseload of patients to support their individual goals. In 1982, I enjoyed the opportunity to assist in the on-site development of this program in another psychiatric hospital in Missouri.
LLE – Pen Portrait Name Julie O’Connor Photo NLE/LLE designation (Date of designation) December 2015 How long have you been a Headteacher/Principal? 5 Years Current School (LA or Sponsor) Woodhouse Primary School (Trafford LA Community School) Recent OfSTED judgement (Overall and Leadership) September 2013 Overall Effectiveness– Good Leadership and Management ‐ Good Context of School I am currently head teacher of a one form entry primary school with a nursery. The school has served the community since the late 1960s. Most pupils live in the immediate vicinity and come from a wide range of socio‐economic backgrounds. The school is very stable with little mobility. The school has low levels of pupils who are deemed to be disadvantaged, however this figure is increasing. The number of pupils from ethnic minority groups is low and those with English as an additional language is very low. The school has seen significant improvement in its performance over the last four years and outcomes at the end of every Key Stage are consistently above national averages.
Appendices: Name of Assessment Areas of Well-being Measured Target Demo Benchmarks Length Pros Cons Cost Links to Resources Well-being Index Life Evaluation Emotional Health Physical Health Healthy Behaviors Work Environment Basic Access 18+ National data, requires Gallup subscription ($8,500/year) 31 items Valid, reliable Heavily tested Length Work & Access not relevant? Not tested for OAs Access to benchmark data requires membership ? WHO-5 (1998) Psychological (i.e. depression) 18+ National data 5 items Short Tested for validity in OAs Short = harder to see where differences lie Free WHOQOL-OLD Physical health Psychological Social Environment 65+ International & National data 24 items Tested in 22 different WHOQOL centers in world Must provide annual update Must provide WHO with raw data Free PWI-A (incorporates QOL and Sub. Well-being) Standard of living Personal health Achieving in life Personal relationships Personal safety 18+ Not tested in OAs, but in other age populations 7-8 items Additional question regarding spirituality Valid (.78 correlation) Reliable Not yet tested in OAs Tested in Australia Free
Future security (.70-.85 Cronbach alpha) SCL/PRB Index Material well-being Physical and cognitive Social engagement Emotional 65+ 12 countries (overall country data) ? Internal research, no outside studies found National level data Access to index ? Diener, Life Sats, subjective Name of Assessment Areas of Wellness Measured Target Demo Benchmarks Length Pros Cons Cost Links to Resources Vitalize360 (formerly COLLAGE) Health Nutrition physical & mental fitness community links lifelong learning spirituality 65+ IL & AL Non available, can compare to other sites potentially? 6 sections ~60 items total Known site in Iowa, Methwick Collects needs, and interests Creates personal goals Provides snapshot Not research based Questionable validity and reliability Lengthy More wellness based Pay for service (waiting to hear back on estimate) MatherLifeways WPWA 6 dimensions of WPW Self-efficacy 65+ No current database for benchmarks 49 items 20-30 mins Online or paper versions Not been outside of ~$15,000
How much do you love Julius Caesar? HATE Neutral? LOVE Julius Caesar Acts and Scenes ACT 1 Feb 14 & Mar 14, Rome Feb 15, 44 BCE A street. Commoners Flavius & Marullus (tribunes) Yay, Caesar! Go home! Feb 15 A public place, celebrating Festival of Lupercal Caesar, Casca, Antony, Calpurnia Commoners, including a Soothsayer Portia, Decius, Cicero, Brutus, Cassius MA, bless C for me. Beware… Don’t you love me? B = good. C = bad. MA offered JC the crown! Mar 14, at night A street. Cicero, Casca, Cassius, Cinna Bad omens! Nah. Join my plot. ACT 2 Mar 15, Rome Mar 15, hours before dawn Brutus’s orchard. Brutus, Lucius Cassius, Casca, Decius, Cinna, Metellus Cimber, Trebonius. Portia. Caius Ligarius. It must be by his death. Plot comes together. I’m worried. Scene 2 Mar 15, morning Caesar’s house. Julius Caesar, Servant, Calpurnia. Decius Brutus, Ligarius, Metellus, Casca, Trebonius, Cinna, Publius Strange times. Bad dream. Stay home! Nope - good dream. I’m going. Mar 15, morning A street near the capitol. Artemidorus I’ll warn him in this letter.
Mar 15, morning In front of Brutus’s house. Portia, Lucius, Soothsayer I’m so worried! ACT 3 Mar 15, Rome Mar 15, morning In front of and inside the Capitol. (Senate is seated at a higher level; they are “inside.”) Crowd, including Artemidorus & Soothsayer Caesar, Brutus, Cassius, Casca, Decius, Metellus, Trebonius, Cinna, Antony, Lepidus, Publius, Popilius, and more Antony’s Servant, then Antony. Octavius’s Servant Mar 15, morning The Forum. Brutus, Cassius, Citizens/Commoners Mark Antony, Caesar’s body Octavius’s Servant Mar 15, later A street. Cinna (a poet) Mob of Citizens/Commoners ACT 4 Dates unknown Date unknown; some days later. A house in Rome. Antony, Octavius, Lepidus Date unknown; some days later again. A military camp near Sardis, in front of Brutus’s tent. Brutus, Lucilius, Lucius, 3 Soldiers. Titinius, Pindarus, Cassius. Immediately after scene 2. Inside Brutus’s tent. Brutus, Cassius lines 0-97. Poet, Lucilius, Titinius, Lucius, Messala. Varro, Claudius. Ghost of Caesar. Act 5 Date unknown, all on one day Date unknown; some days later. The plains of Philippi. Octavius, Antony, their army, Messenger. Brutus, Cassius, their army, Lucilius, Titinius, Messala, and others. Same day. The plains of Philippi. The battlefield. Brutus, Messala Same day. The plains of Philippi. Another part of the battlefield.
this regard and this is an issue that the court may, all things being equal, have to deal with. [10] Before I can deal with these and other issues for determination, I find it appropriate to point out that regardless of the divergent views and postures adopted by the protagonists regarding most of the issues in contention, there are at the least, two important issues upon which unanimity, although not reached, a determination can be made, based on the respondent’s version, which it appears the applicant is not able to deny. This is consistent with what is referred to as the Plascons Evan’s rule in civil procedure. [11] The first is that the criminal proceedings were postponed by the Windhoek Magistrates Court with the consent of all the parties, to 22 June 2018. This was to allow further investigations into the charges preferred to be pursued. That, in my view, is a matter that I can regard as settled. I say so in view of the fact that that was the reason advanced and on the basis of which the Magistrate’s Court postponed the matter to 22 June, as aforesaid. No issue is raised about the correctness of the respondent’s position that the investigations in that matter have not been concluded. In this regard, Mr. Marondedze, an officer of the court, has stated on oath that this is the correct position and I cannot, in the circumstances, particularly in the absence of anything suggesting the contrary, discard or debunk his evidence without ceremony. I therefor hold this for a fact. [12] The second issue, relates to the ‘record’ which is sought to be produced in this application. The applicant, in his replying affidavit, did not contest the correctness of Mr. Marondedze’s assertion in this regard that the said record is in fact the docket. In the heads of argument, the applicant, for the first time asserts that this is a matter within the peculiar knowledge of the respondent and to which he is not privy. Mr. Marondedze, an officer of the court, has, again stated on oath that this is the position. Owing to the fact that he has stated so, I have no basis upon which I can find otherwise on this issue. It would be a sad day, if not doomsday itself, when officers of this court would make
Julius Caesar Overview Point/Topic is the focus of the question They disperse the crowd and remove banners and signs honoring Caesar. Question: Why do the characters talk of limiting the power of Caesar? How does that foreshadow the action in the play? Explain how the mentioning of this in the introduction focuses the reader on one of its main themes. Answer (this is your Topic or Point): Flavius and Marullus want to limit the power of Caesar. Quotes Use as Evidence Flavius: “…let no images/Be hung with Caesar’s trophies. I’ll about/And drive away the vulgar from the streets./ So do you too, where you perceive them thick./ These growing feathers plucked from Caesar’s wing/ Will make him fly an ordinary pitch,/ Who else would soar above the view of men/ And keep us all in servile fearfulness” (Julius Caesar 1.1.67-74). For Analysis metaphor crowd=feathers The thick crowd are “growing feathers” or adding to the wings of Caesar and the height to which Caesar can soar. metaphor Caesar=bird / wing=army Caesar is compared to a bird. Consider him like an eagle or a falcon that flies high and hunts other prey below. He makes others below afraid, like a falcon hunting pigeons or other birds. Foreshadowing Caesar-limiting his power Effect of foreshadowing and metaphor: The effect of these lines and these literary elements is to make eager the audience’s appetite for the assassination of Caesar, and to create in the audience an anticipation of the violence. Notes Significance The reader history is clear on the fact-- that Caesar is assassinated. Shakespeare makes use of this foreknowledge of the audience to promote a sense of urgency and fate that Caesar will be slain. Rather than being a hunting bird, or perhaps even a god, he will be reduced to a more normal state--that of an average bird, or of a mortal man--one who can, and must, die. His death will be the freedom from fear and from being only servants. The theme of power and its limits is expressed in these actions, and Shakespeare expresses well that power must have limits, though seeking to control that power does have its consequences.
Rough Draft due date: _________________________ Final Draft due date: _______________________ Weight: 100 points Thesis 15 points Focus of Topic 25 points Use and Citation of Evidence 25 points Idea Development 20 points Spelling, Grammar, and Mechanics/ Formatting 15 points *Original and interesting *Specifically states argument (is NOT vague) *Incorporates information which previews each of the 3 body paragraphs *Lends itself to being supported by evidence from the text *Topic is clearly identified in introduction and throughout essay *Essay clearly addresses the prompt and fully answers the question asked *The ideas discussed are clearly and accurately derived from the documents and class discussions *Main idea is and throughout essay *Each point made is sufficiently supported by evidence from the documents (about one citation per body paragraph) *Quotes are fully introduced and blended *Quotes are properly cited *Quotes are fully explained *Examples/ supporting details are appropriate and relevant to the argument being made *A larger conclusion about the importance of Julius Caesar is made (go beyond saying he was “good” or “bad”) *Explanations are given to show how each piece of evidence advances the overall thesis *At some point in essay, refutes counter-arguments (say why the opposite position is incorrect) *There are NO spelling errors *There is correct subject-verb agreement *No switching from past to present tense *No run-on sentences (Appropriate use of commas and *Correct punctuation and capitalization *Size 12 Times New Roman font, one inch margins, double spaced *Correct header (single spaced) Total: ____________________________________
13. What is Caesar’s description of Antony? 14. What is an aside? Act II, Scene III Who is Artemidorus? Act II, Scene IV How does Portia characterize herself? Women? Act III, Scene I 1. What is the setting? 2. What’s Caesar’s attitude toward the soothsayer? Artimedorus? 3. On what pretext does Metellus petition Caesar? What is Caesar’s reaction to him? Hubus? 4. What metaphor does Caesar use to explain why he won’t change his mind? 5. What’s Olympus? 6. Et Tu, Brute? What does it mean? 7. What does Cinna scream to the crowd? What would Machiavelli say? 8. What does Brutus assure the Senators of with his statement “ambition’s debt is paid.” 9. What gross act of symbolism does Brutus suggest? 10. How does Shakespeare insert one of his attitudes into the scene? 11. Antony sends a servant to ask what of Brutus? 12. What is Brutus’s answer? Cassius? 13. What question or concern does Antony express upon his arrival? 14. What does Brutus assure Antony? 15. How does Cassius try to win him? 16. In shaking hands with the conspirators, Antony says they must have one of two possible opinions. What? 17. What metaphor does Antony use for Caesar?
Lenoir, J., Gégout, J-C., Guisan, A., Vittoz, P., Wohlgemuth, T., Zimmermann, N., E., Dullinger, S., Pauli, H., Willner, W., Grytnes, J-A., Virtanen, R. & Svenning, J-C. 2010. Cross-Scale Analysis of the Region Effect on Vascular Plant Species Diversity in Southern and Northern European Mountain Ranges. – PLoS ONE 5(12): e15734 Pajunen, A.M., Kaarlejärvi, E.M., Forbes, B.C., & Virtanen, R. 2010. Compositional differentiation, vegetation-environment relationships and classification of vegetation in the western Eurasian Arctic. – Journal of Vegetation Science 21: 107 – 119. Ruotsalainen, A.L. & Kytöviita, M.-M. 2010. Nitrogen concentration does not increase in ectomycorrhizal basidiocarps with increasing altitude. – North American Fungi 5: 205 – 213. Systra, Y.J. 2010. Bedrock and Quanternary sediment geochemistry and biodiversity in Eastern Fennoscandia and Estonia. – Forestry Studies/Metsanduslikud Uurimused 53: 35 – 52.
PUBLIC TIMETABLE JULY-AUGUST 2018 MONDAY / TUESDAY WEDNESDAY/ THURSDAY FRIDAY 8.00am - 9.00am A* 9.00am – 10.00am AI 10.00am – 12.45pm G 12.45pm - 1.45pm A 2.00pm – 7. 00pm G 7. 00pm - 9.45pm A SATURDAY / SUNDAY BANK HOLIDAY MONDAY 6th 11.00am - 6.00pm G 6.00pm - 7.45pm A G: General Public A*: Adult Lane Swimming AI: Adult & Infant (2 Lanes) A: Adult Only (2 Lanes) SAFETY FIRST: CHILDREN UNDER NINE MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY AN ADULT IN THE WATER REGARDLESS OF THE CHILDS ABILITY. Timetable may change at short notice! Please check reception Or for details
IP Transition effects on Number Portability Mary Retka provided a report: The major piece is the PTSC document on Nationwide Number Portability which will be reviewed by the LNPA WG. LNPA Transition Discussion - All The APT continues to review the industry test cases for turning up an NPAC/SMS. The Transition Oversight Manager (TOM) scheduled time following the July LNPA Working Group Meeting to informally meet persons interested in discussing the LNPA transition project. Nationwide Number Portability (NNP) – PTSC Document Review – ALL Penn Pfautz gave an overview of the ATIS PTSC Document 5 Approaches covered in the document. Commercial Agreements (the CCA/CTIA Interim solution). Using 3rd parties to provide a point of interconnection in the ported-from LATA and transport terminating calls to recipient carrier network National LRN – allows LRN to be used outside the current LATA boundaries Location Portability per GR-2982-CORE – original (c.1998) specification for portability outside the rate center – circuit switched based. Need an additional signaling parameter (GUBB – geographic unit building block NPA-NXX format) administered by the NPAC Non-Geographic LRN – new numbering resources (Non-geographic area code) to be used for routing numbers (NGLRN) for NNP TNs. Internet Interconnection – this is Port IP transition approach. The NNP sub-committee of the LNPA WG will look at the 5 Approaches that the ATIS PTSC covered in the document that they sent out to determine if there would need to be changes in the flows, processes, or NPAC system(s). There will be an update from the subcommittee in the September 2016 meeting. Develop the LNPA WG Report to the NANC, FON, IMG, etc.
MONTH (2016) NANC MEETING DATES LNPA WG MEETING/CALL DATES HOST COMPANY MEETING LOCATION January 5th – 6th iconectiv La Jolla, CA February 11th Conference Call March 1st – 2nd Comcast Denver, CO April 13th Conference Call May 3rd – 4th Neustar Miami, FL June 8th Conference Call July 12th – 13th Bandwidth.com Durham, NC August 10th Conference Call September 13th – 14th Sprint Overland Park, KS October 12th Conference Call November 8th – 9th Verizon Wireless & AT&T Atlanta, GA December 7th Conference Call Next Conference Call … August 10, 2016 Next Meeting … September 13-14, 2016: Location…Overland Park, KS …Hosted by Sprint
Charleston SC James Devorick, Danielle Spence, Erin Brickhouse , Bill Skipper, Edwin Johnson, Rev. Norman Suggs, Robert Caldwell, Les Warboys, Deborah Patrick’s brother, John Rego, Dalton Arseneau, Pam Collins Mission Trips: Patty, Deanna, Pastor Dennis, – Heidi, Chelsie, Taylor CEF, BJ & Bill – NY Camp Shut Ins : Ester Edwards, Lucy Brennan, Announcements July No Trustee Meeting or Men’s Breakfast - Resume August 9th Emmaus Walks (Seek Wisdom) Men’s Emmaus Walk #133 Lay Director: Dan Burden Spiritual Director: Ken Land September 24–27 Girl’s Chrysalis Flight Lay Director: Judy Price October 3–5 Women’s Emmaus Walk #134 Lay Director: Melody Edge Spiritual Director: Mary Jane Wilson-Parsons October 8–11 Boy’s Chrysalis Flight Lay Director: Brad Moore October 17–19 (student must be in grades 10-12) Centenary UMC Craft Store Open Friday, Saturday 1:00-4:00 Bible Study Tonight Sunday at 6:30 Chapter 14 The Story July 26 The Story 15 God’s Messengers Conway Centenary United Methodist Rev. Dennis Jay Devorick KINGS & KINGDOMS www.ccuMethodist.com Following Jesus + Making Disciples = Transforming the World
appoint, and then the mentor will let the nominating committee know that the person is ready for nominating. Mary J. suggested that the person could have a choice of which committee they would like to work on. George and Mary E. both agree. Mary E. stated that, “I like that, to have the choice or the option to have the individual not as a mandate but as a voluntary practice to participate in contributing whatever strengths or skills that individual has. The interview wouldn't be part of the recruiting process but it would be part of the onboarding process. I believe the vision is someone shows an interest in the SILC and next they would and I really like the mentor idea because I really think if there's a mentor, that's a connection. If a mentor could try to assess from the individual what they're looking for, what their expectations are from the SILC, and what if they have any ideas what role they can see themselves playing in the membership of the SILC, so I think that with the interviewing process, with the mentor, if the mentor is willing to accept the responsibility for that. Also, I do know some other groups when individuals are interested in volunteering, I know we have the governor's application. But and I could send George and Mary this. We have a volunteer application at the center where we ask individuals what they want to contribute, what where we ask them what role they see themselves playing, we ask them exactly what do they want to do. A lot of them will say learn, but they also come with a lot of skills that they can contribute right away. That's something to consider for onboarding. “ Dawn stated that she could bring an etiquette form that could be signed by everyone including new recruits along with a questionnaire that either the person or the Nominating Committee could use to interview the person. Mary E. stated that her CIL has forms for volunteering, clerical support, mentoring etc. that could be used. Rique stated that there is already a code of ethics through the Governor’s office that all Disability committees will be signing. She also stated that the gubernatorial application is already completed in the Governor’s office. Mary E. asked Rique if the gubernatorial application has a signatory location for conflict of interest. Rique confirmed that it did and that she had made some additions regarding that. Mark stated that his idea of onboarding included training after the person had been put on a council and then as needed.
NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION BUILDING DEPARTMENT KAROL BAGH ZONE Subject: Details of Sanctioned Building Plans JULY 2012 S. No. Application File No. with dated Name of Owner(s) Name of Architect Name of Structural Engineer Address of the property Date of sanction of Building Plans Remarks if any 1 148/B/KBZ/12/166 dt.19.6.12 Sh. Tushar Gupta Pawan Sharma S.L.Dhir 18/1, West Patel Nagar, New Delhi 2.7.12 2 149/B/KBZ/12/167 dt.19.6.12 Smt. Meena Khandelwal, Smt. Sadhna Khandelwal, Smt. Priyanka Khandelwal & Smt. Pinki Khandelwal Pawan Sharma S.L.Dhir 6/12, WEA, Karol Bagh, New Delhi 2.7.12 3 102/B/WZ/2011/I/KBZ/168 dt.8.9.11 Sh. Jagbir Singh, Sh. Parminder Singh, Sh. Gurdeep Singh & Sh. Sucha Singh Deepak Gupta Sharad Gupta A-2, Saraswati Garden, New Delhi 2.7.12 4 94/B/WZ/2011/I/KBZ/169 dt.1.9.11 Sh. Puran Lal Yudhveer Singh S.L.Dhir F-307, Sudershan Park, New Delhi 2.7.12 5 146/B/KBZ/12/170 dt.18.6.12 Sh. Kunal Gupta & Sh. Sunil Kumar S.L.Dhir S.L.Dhir 14-B/20, Dev Nagar, New Delhi 3.7.12
leadership, and professional development of flight crewmembers in part 121 operations. The amendments are intended to contribute significantly to airline safety by reducing aviation accidents and respond to the mandate in P.L. 111-216. Effects: Prompting action: Statute Rulemaking Project Initiated: 08/01/2010 Docket Number: Dates for Undetermined: Federal Register Citation for Undetermined: None Federal Aviation Administration 12. Popular Title: Slot Management and Transparency RIN 2120-AJ89 Stage: NPRM Previous Stage:None Abstract: This rulemaking would replace the current temporary orders limiting scheduled operations at LaGuardia Airport, John F. Kennedy International Airport, and Newark Liberty International Airport with a more permanent rule to address the issues of congestion and delay at the New York area´s three major commercial airports, while also promoting fair access and competition. The rulemaking would help ensure that congestion and delays are managed by limiting scheduled and unscheduled operations. The rulemaking would also establish a secondary market for U.S. and foreign air carriers to buy, sell, trade, and lease slots amongst each other at each of the three airports. This would allow carriers serving or seeking to serve the New York area airports to exchange slots as their business models and strategic goals require. Effects: Prompting action: None Rulemaking Project Initiated: 10/21/2010 Docket Number: Dates for NPRM:
Dates for NPRM: Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 100. Popular Title: Excess Flow Valves RIN 2137-AE71 Stage: NPRM Previous Stage: ANPRM 11/25/2011; CP ended 2/18/12; CP extended to 3/19/2012 Abstract: This rulemaking would require excess flow valves (EFVs) be installed in all new and renewed gas service lines, for structures other than single family dwellings, when the operating conditions are compatible with readily available valves. These changes would be in response to NTSB and PHMSA investigations of current EFV installation practices. The intended effect of the rule is to increase the level of safety for structures other than single family dwellings currently subject to Federal pipeline safety regulation. Effects: Prompting action: None Rulemaking Project Initiated: 10/01/2010 Docket Number: PHMSA-2011-0009 Dates for NPRM:
Application Online Meeting and Luncheon Registration Secured Member Login Vendor Banner Advertising BID NO 160-12 AWARDED TO: Kelly Road Builders, Inc. GRAVEL & RIP RAP PRODUCTS BID NO 95-13 AWARDED TO: Wade Sand &Gravel & Vulcan Materials For additional information concerning these contracts, please contact Sandra Tellis, Principal Buyer at
Treatment with Agonist Replacement Therapies (START) study. . PMC4220245 (Available Nov. 1, 2015) Urada, D., Rawson, R.A., & Onuki, M. (2014). Peace building through a substance use conference structured on peace psychology principles. 4. Witbrodt, J., Kaskutas, L.A., & Grella, C.E. (2015). How do recovery definitions distinguish recovering individuals? Five typologies. 7. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.12.036. PMCID: PMC4330112 Woods, L., Yefimova, M., & Brecht, M.-L. (2014). A method for measuring person-centered interventions: Detecting and characterizing complex behavioral symptoms of persons with dementia. . doi: 10.1080/07317115.2013.868850 Worley, M.J., Shoptaw, S.J., Bickel, W.K., & Ling, W. (2015). Using behavioral economics to predict opioid use during prescription opioid dependence treatment. . doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.12.018.
NEXT MEETING AGENDA Review DRAFT changes made to the “Roadside Vegetation Management and Last Resort Herbicide Use Policy (Lane Code 15.500 – .510)” Continue review and update to the “Roadside Vegetation Management and Last Resort Herbicide Use Policy (Lane Code 15.500 – 15.530)” ADJOURNMENT Chair Mooney adjourned the meeting at 8:05 p.m. Orin Schumacher, Minutes Recorder