zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
The JTB discussed transport issues affecting the borough in detail, including urging KCC to use ‘20’s plenty’ to provide safer travel in towns and villages; M2 widening at Faversham; completion of the Northern Relief Road; school transport options; concerns about the road network on the Isle of Sheppey; and more frequent train services. The concern was also raised that ‘20’s plenty’ increases pollution. The Chairman proposed that delegated powers be given to him, the Vice-Chairman, and the Swale Cabinet Member for Environment and Rural Affairs to report back to the consultation with issues raised at the JTB. This was seconded and the report was noted. Thanet It was noted that LTP4 is intended to be a higher level than the district transport strategy; that Thanet District Council proposed the inclusion of ‘Ramsgate Port Investment’; a scheme to improve signage for walkers would be in keeping with Outcome 5; and that the ‘Journey Time Improvement project’ should also be shown in LTP4 in addition to ‘Thanet Parkway Railway Station’. The report was then noted. Tonbridge and Malling The report was presented and the Board were invited to respond to the consultation. Reference was made to the proposals affecting Tonbridge and Malling. Tunbridge Wells There were two public speakers at this JTB – a representative from the Town Forum Transport Working Group and the former Borough Councillor, David Scott. The Town Forum felt strategic transport was too focused on north Kent, and that the west of the county should have better links to East Sussex. They also asked for devolution of funding to local communities, for example for street lighting. David Scott asked for more emphasis on technology and presented the idea of rapid transit pods as alternative public transport in Tunbridge Wells. The Board members discussed the draft plan and remarked that it was of a high-level and did not do much for Tunbridge Wells specifically, also that making Kent a pioneer in terms of active travel needs evidencing. Questionnaire Analysis For the analysis of each question, the four district council responses that were submitted online have been excluded and will be considered separately alongside the other district councils’, and Medway Council’s, responses. Question 3: the Ambition
Q6a. Please add any comments on the Kent-Wide Priorities for the Local Transport Plan below: Please specify which Kent-Wide priorities you are commenting on. Q7. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the District Priorities for the Local Transport Plan? (Pages 24 to 50 in the LTP) Please select one box. Strongly agree Agree Neither agree nor disagree Disagree Strongly disagree Don’t know
not expect our staff to tolerate unacceptable behaviour and will take action to protect staff from that behaviour, including that which is abusive, offensive or threatening. Little Thurrock Primary School defines unreasonable complainants as ‘those who, because of the frequency or nature of their contacts with the school, hinder our consideration of their or other people’s complaints’. A complaint may be regarded as unreasonable when the person making the complaint :- refuses to articulate their complaint or specify the grounds of a complaint or the outcomes sought by raising the complaint, despite offers of assistance; refuses to co-operate with the complaints investigation process while still wishing their complaint to be resolved; refuses to accept that certain issues are not within the scope of a complaints procedure; insists on the complaint being dealt with in ways which are incompatible with the adopted complaints procedure or with good practice; introduces trivial or irrelevant information which the complainant expects to be taken into account and commented on, or raises large numbers of detailed but unimportant questions, and insists they are fully answered, often immediately and to their own timescales; makes unjustified complaints about staff who are trying to deal with the issues, and seeks to have them replaced; changes the basis of the complaint as the investigation proceeds; repeatedly makes the same complaint (despite previous investigations or responses concluding that the complaint is groundless or has been addressed); refuses to accept the findings of the investigation into that complaint where the school’s complaint procedure has been fully and properly implemented and completed including referral to the Department for Education seeks an unrealistic outcome; makes excessive demands on school time by frequent, lengthy, complicated and stressful contact with staff regarding the complaint in person, in writing, by email and by telephone while the complaint is being dealt with. A complaint may also be considered unreasonable if the person making the complaint does so either face-to-face, by telephone or in writing or electronically:- maliciously; aggressively; using threats, intimidation or violence; using abusive, offensive or discriminatory language; knowing it to be false; using falsified information; publishing unacceptable information in a variety of media such as in social media websites and newspapers
I. Action Plan Progress Report 1. Progress on Implementation of Previous Year’s Action Plans Actions Planned Planned Completion Date Person Responsible Completed If Not Complete, Give Reasons a. Actions Planned Planned Completion Date Person Responsible Completed If Not Complete, Give Reasons b. Actions Planned Planned Completion Date Person Responsible Completed If Not Complete, Give Reasons c. Actions Planned Planned Completion Date Person Responsible Completed If Not Complete, Give Reasons d.
[Officer] [Designation and team] _______________________________________________ ACCEPTANCE OF AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR THE [CONTRACT TITLE] I/We _________________________ confirm acceptance of the contract for the [contract title] as set out in this letter. Signed ……………………………………………………………… Name (Block Capitals) ……………………………………………………………… Position/Job Title ……………………………………………………………… For and on behalf of ……………………………………………………………… Date ………………………………………………………………
Year 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Taxation Calculations ($'000 NOMINAL) - as per Clause 1E.9.3 Nominal Revenue - - - - 1,944 16,824 60,958 +Value of Assets Received for Nil Consideration - - - - - 122,854 67,251 -Nominal Operating Expenditure - 139 82,255 330,865 499,419 778,673 1,215,514 -Nominal Tax Depreciation - - - 1,245 57,929 164,904 300,744 -Interest Expense - - 0 0 15 123 1 Taxable Profit – as per Clause 1E.9.3 - (139) (82,256) (332,110) (555,420) (804,023) (1,388,050) Tax Loss Carried Forward (Start period) – as per Clause 1E.9.3 - - (139) (82,395) (414,505) (969,924) (1,773,947) Tax Loss Carried Forward (End period) – as per Clause 1E.9.3 - (139) (82,395) (414,505) (969,924) (1,773,947) (3,161,997) Net Tax Allowance – as per Clause 1E.9.3 - - - - - - - Year 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 ICRA and CFRA ($'000 NOMINAL) – as per Clause 1E.5 ICRA (start period) – as per Clause 1E.5.2 - - 139 82,407 425,296 1,060,024 2,128,102 Unrecovered Cost -as per Clause 1E.5.1 - 139 82,255 335,551 597,625 999,078 1,620,786 ICRA (end period) – as per Clause 1E.5.2 - 139 82,407 425,296 1,060,024 2,128,102 3,899,511 Carry Forward Revenue Adjustment – as per Clause 1E.5.3 - n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Session aims: Share getting to know you games Participants know what to expect of the weekend Participants share their expectations for the weekend Participants were welcomed to Lockerbrook by Kat and Ellie. We played a name game: Say your name whilst doing a silly action. Everyone in the circle repeats your name and the action. Go round the whole circle until everyone has had a turn. We discussed the timetable for the weekend and the training aims. Participant Expectations Participants were asked to share their expectations, particularly focusing on: What they were most looking forward to? What they were hoping to learn? What they were worried about? Responses included: Looking forward to… Hoping to learn… Worried about… Family time New environment Good food! Meeting new people The food and peace and quiet Meeting more Woodcraft people Co-operative craft, creative stuff Meeting lots of new Woodies! Hash browns! Feeling like I’m helping Spending time with other Woodies in a beautiful location New play/craft ideas Songs New games and songs Woodcraft stuff! Learning more about Woodcraft as an organisation - still more to learn, e.g. networking, role sheet, organisational structure More about Woodcraft Folk, build confidence in putting sessions/lessons together How all of the sessions run, eg disscussion techniques Woodcraft principles into practice Knowledge About Woodcraft ethos Learning how to make stuff out of stuff About how a group works Figuring out all the procedures/forms and it being more involved than I first thought… do I have enough time to commit to a group? Being tired at work on Monday Not doing enough for my secret friend Putting ideas into practice Understanding the skeleton… chair, vice etc Getting home Getting packed up ‘Holding’ or ‘owning’ Woodcraft identity - songs, games, mottos etc Getting enough sleep My children fighting and being generally disruptive Be competent and confident to safeguard children (Claire Knight pointed out that when you stop worrying about this, that’s when you’re not competent) Making sure everyone gets what they want out of the weekend (you
Estee Lauder Pty Ltd (ABN: 63 008 444 719) Erskineville NSW 2043 Limited-small volume: Chemical other than polymer (1 tonne or less per year). 75 No details are claimed exempt from publication. 24 Variation to the schedule of data requirements is claimed as follows: all physico-chemical endpoints None None IDENTITY OF CHEMICAL Incroquat Palm CAS 857026-47-2 1-Propanaminium, 3-amino-N,N,N-trimethyl-, N-palm-oil acyl derivs., Me sulfates Unspecified Approximately 466-493 Da Reference IR spectra were provided. COMPOSITION > 99% Chemical Name 1,3-Propanediamine, N,N-dimethyl- CAS No. 109-55-7 Weight % < 0.001% Hazardous Properties Xn; R22 C; R34 R43 Conc. ≥ 25%: C; R34; R22; R43; ≥ 10% Conc. < 25%: C; R34; R43; ≥ 5% Conc. < 10%: Xi; R36/38; R43; ≥ 1% Conc. < 5%: Xi; R43. CHEMICAL
Dear Student, On behalf of , we are pleased to recognize you for qualifying for the State Seal of Biliteracy. You have qualified based on meeting the criteria established by the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. These criteria include meeting all high school graduation requirements in our district, including demonstrating proficiency in English as required by state tests. In addition, you have demonstrated a high level of proficiency in a language other than English. http://www.k12.wa.us/WorldLanguages/SealofBiliteracy.aspx. Qualification for the State Seal of Biliteracy Student Name: Student ID: Language: [Select one of the following six tables. Replace the example text with your information. Delete this message and the extra tables prior to saving file.] Test Language AP Number Passing Score Year Tested Advanced Placement (AP) AP Spanish 9999999 4 2015 Test Language Level Passing Score Year Taken International Baccalaureate (IB) French SL 5 2015 Dates ALTA Test (ILR Level) ACTFL Proficiency Level March 21, 2015 Writing Skills Assessment (ILR 4+) Superior April 4, 2015 Speaking & Listening Test (ILR 4+) Superior Recommended Credit Equivalency 4 high school credits Dates ACTFL Test (Level) ACTFL Proficiency Rating October 17, 2014 Writing Proficiency Test (WPT) (10) Superior November 1, 2014 Oral Proficiency Interview (OPIc) (9) Advanced High Recommended Credit Equivalency 4 high school credits
Civil Engineering & Geosciences (27-28 April 2017) October 2017 January 2018 May 2018 October 2018 Music (23 March 2017) October 2017 January 2018 January 2019 February 2019 Modern Languages (28-29 November 2016) February 2017 April 2017 May 2018 June 2018 Medical Education (14-15 November 2016) February 2017 March 2017 March 2018 April 2018 Dental Sciences (27 October 2016) February 2017 April 2017 May 2018 June 2018 2015/16 Marine Technology (2-3 June 2016) December 2016 February 2017 February 2018 May 2018 History (24 May 2016) July 2016 November 2016 March 2018 April 2018 Leadership, Work and Organisations (23-24 May 2016) December 2016 February 2017 February 2018 April 2018 Marine Science (29 April 2016) October 2016 February 2017 February 2018 April 2018
College or School Department or Program UC Davis Headline Goes Here Event Subhead here a consequat ver sum idunt la facin euis ad euipit irit duci ini con porum qui ate volum qui dolenisquam.
TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY 3 CONCLUSIONS AND REGULATORY OBLIGATIONS 3 ASSESSMENT DETAILS 4 1. APPLICANT AND NOTIFICATION DETAILS 4 2. IDENTITY OF CHEMICAL 5 3. COMPOSITION 5 4. PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES 5 5. INTRODUCTION AND USE INFORMATION 6 6. HUMAN HEALTH IMPLICATIONS 7 6.1. Exposure Assessment 7 6.1.1. Occupational Exposure 7 6.1.2. Public Exposure 8 6.2. Human Health Effects Assessment 8 6.3. Human Health Risk Characterisation 8 6.3.1. Occupational Health and Safety 8 6.3.2. Public Health 8 7. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS 8 7.1. Environmental Exposure & Fate Assessment 8 7.1.1. Environmental Exposure 8 7.1.2. Environmental Fate 9 7.1.3. Predicted Environmental Concentration (PEC) 9 7.2. Environmental Effects Assessment 10 7.2.1. Predicted No-Effect Concentration 10 7.3. Environmental Risk Assessment 11 BIBLIOGRAPHY 12 SUMMARY The following details will be published in the NICNAS Chemical Gazette: ASSESSMENT REFERENCE APPLICANT(S) CHEMICAL OR TRADE NAME HAZARDOUS INTRODUCTION VOLUME USE LTD/1679 Akzo Nobel Pty Ltd Polymer in RE6723 ND* ≤ 30 tonnes per annum Component of automotive paints and coatings *ND = not determined CONCLUSIONS AND REGULATORY OBLIGATIONS Hazard classification As no toxicity data were provided, the notified polymer cannot be classified according to the Globally Harmonised System for the Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS), as adopted for industrial chemicals in Australia, or the Approved Criteria for Classifying Hazardous Substances (NOHSC, 2004). Human health risk assessment Under the conditions of the occupational settings described, the notified polymer is not considered to pose an unreasonable risk to the health of workers provided that recommended OHS controls are being adhered to. When used in the proposed manner, the notified polymer is not considered to pose an unreasonable risk to public health.
Free English Classes in Thompson Personal Information First Name Last Name Status in Canada Permanent Resident or Refugee Landing Date:____________________ Canadian Citizen Work Visa/ Student Visa Refugee Claimant Country of origin Languages spoken Occupation in country of origin Occupation in Canada Years of education Years in Canada Contact Information E-mail Phone Town/City Cell phone ESL history and preferences Have you taken any ESL classes in Canada? Yes No School: Have you taken a Canadian Language Benchmark Placement Test? Yes No If yes, when? _______________________ Levels: L:______ S:_______ R: _______ W:_______ Have you ever taken a one of the following language tests? IELTS TOEFL CanTEST other If yes, when? _______________________ Levels: L:______ S:_______ R: _______ W:_______ Would you be interested in attending English classes in Thompson? Yes No When would you like to attend classes? Morning Afternoon Evening How often would you like to attend classes? 2 days a week 3 days a week more than 3 days a week How long would you like the classes to be 2 hours 3 hours More Do you require childcare for classes Yes No How many children do you have? List ages of your children: For more information, please email us at or visit our website at
SAMPLE RESPONSE LETTER PUT ON YOUR OWN LETTERHEAD [School] ACARA Health and Physical Education Consultation Level 10, 255 Pitt Street Sydney NSW 2000 Inclusion of Outdoor Education in the Health and Physical Education Curriculum Dear ACARA As a principal of [Name of School] I am aware of the changes happening with the development of the National Curriculum in Health and Physical Education. In the current social and community context where students are disconnected from nature I believe that Outdoor Education provides a unique range of educational, social, environmental and health benefits to students. It is important that these benefits are recognised and that every child has the option to access quality Outdoor Education as part of balanced curriculum from pre-school to year 12. The following observations are made of the draft shaping paper: Outdoor Education as both subject and learning process are significant components of the Health and PE (HPE) learning area within the current WA curriculum. The draft shaping paper appears to deal only with the subject Health and Physical Education. Although Outdoor Education has evolved to be a different subject to HPE, with differing content and often responding to different specific social imperatives, it remains focused upon a broad notion of health and wellbeing. While outdoor education as a method of learning can make contributions to other areas, such as Geography, other learning areas and sense of place, Outdoor Education resides most comfortably within the HPE learning area and should be clearly identified there. This is because it ultimately seeks and promotes wellbeing – both human and environmental. The shaping paper should recognise the importance to Australian children to have opportunity and capacity to recreate and respond in nature. These are acknowledged important health and well being educational goals for the 21st century. Outdoor Education’s position in a health and activity related learning area comes as a consequence of our primary affiliation with nature. The opportunity to recreate and be in contact with more natural settings contributes fundamentally to individual wellbeing and health, a tenet well proven through research.
7 AOB 7.1 The drinking water at the surgery is to be labelled. 7.2 The waiting room 2 is very stuffy, could this be improved? 7.3 Although the parking space is limited, it is more than other surgery’s. 7.4 Robin Grundy raised the issue of the communication stream – the PPG has a secure email and there’s a page on the surgery’s website. Perhaps the Chairman, Vice Chairman, Treasurer & Secretary should have their own unique PPG email. 7.5 There were issues with letter box, can we check its needs? 7.6 With NHS celebrating its 70th year, should we arrange an event as well? Ideas were needed like, early stories of peoples experiences of the NHS, any helpful suggestions should be emailed to Dr. Dhillon Paula Dr. Hewett PPG meeting PPG meeting Dr. Dhillon 8 Next General Meeting will be on 23rd July at 1:00pm to 2:00pm All
June 2017 Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat May 29 Intro May 30 Intro May 31 1 2 Intro 3 4 Open 5 6 7 8 8 10 11 12 Intro 13 Open 14 15 16 Open 17 18 Open 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Open 27 Open 28 29 30 July 2017 Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Open 11 Open 12 13 14 Open 15 16 Open 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Open 25 Open 26 27 28 Open 29 30 Open 31 August 2017 ► Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Open 9 10 11 Open 12 13 Open 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Open 22 Open 23 24 25 Open 26 27 Open 28 29 30 31
SA1.2, SA5.11, SA5.12, SA5.13, SA6.2, SA6.4, , SA6.7, SA6.8 5 50 SA3.1, SA4.3, SA4.4, SA5.1, SA5.3, SA5.6, SA5.7, SA5.8, SA5.14, SA5.15, SB3.1, SB3.2, SB3.5, SB3.6, SB3.7, SB3.8 10 100 *At 1 July 2012, one (1) penalty unit is equivalent to $141.00. More Information Northern Territory Department of Primary Industry and Fisheries website website Fit to Load Guide on MLA website Darwin Region Senior Field Veterinary Officer Ph: 08 8999 2035 M: 0427 003 600 Regional Livestock Biosecurity Officer Ph: 08 8999 2030 M: 0439 270 039 Katherine Region Field Veterinary Officer Ph: 08 8973 9716 M: 0407 498 003 Regional Livestock Biosecurity Officer Ph: 08 8973 9754 M: 0418 895 084 Tennant Creek Region Regional Livestock Biosecurity Officer Ph: 08 8962 4458 M: 0401 113 445 Livestock Biosecurity Officer Ph: 08 8962 4492 M: 0457 517 347 Alice Springs Region Senior Field Veterinary Officer Ph: 08 8951 8181 M: 0401 118 181 Regional Livestock Biosecurity Officer Ph: 08 8951 8125 M: 0401 118 125 Disclaimer: While all care has been taken to ensure that information contained in this document is true and correct at the time of publication, the Northern Territory of Australia gives no warranty or assurance, and makes no representation as to the accuracy of any information or advice contained in this publication, or that it is suitable for your intended use. No serious, business or investment decisions should be made in reliance on this information without obtaining independent and/or professional advice in relation to your particular situation.
can be undertaken. • If cattle are unloaded and provided with water for less than 4 hours, their time off water, is not reduced. • If water is provided for 4 to 24 hours, the time is deducted from the time off water. • The time off water is calculated by adding: assembly time; time in a holding facility prior to loading; loading; time on a vehicle; unloading; holding in a handling 13 Dogs are under control when working cattle. facility or at a destination until water is provided.
This form must be completed and submitted via email to If you have questions as you are completing the form, please contact PROJECT INFORMATION Enter Today’s Date: 1. Researcher's name(s). Stephen Krammin, Danielle Manley, Mateusz Koper 2. Researcher's LTU ID number(s). Stephen-000696938, Danielle-, Mateusz- 000689671 3. Researcher's email address. (List all valid emails) skrammin@ltu.edu, dmanley@ltu.edu, mkoper@ltu.edu 4. Project title. 5. Research collaborators and roles. (Enter names and roles of all collaborators who will be conducting research with the Researcher; If researcher is a student, please provide the name of the committee chair or other faculty member supervising this research.) Dr Ken Cook, Dr Mansoor Nasir, Gerald LeCarpentier 6. Email address(es) of the supervising faculty member and any other co-researcher collaborators kcook@ltu.edu, mnasir@ltu.edu, glecarpen@ltu.edu 7. Lawrence Tech program affiliation(s) of researcher: Architecture and Design (specify program: ) Arts and Sciences (specify program: ) Engineering (specify program: Biomedical) Management (specify program: ) 8. Type of research: Doctoral Dissertation Master’s Thesis Project Seminar Senior/Honor’s Project Faculty Research Research for a Course (Specify course number and name: , Semester: , and Instructor Name: ) Other GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED RESEARCH 9. Using lay terms please state your research question(s). (Do not use of jargon or acronyms, as this application must be comprehensible to IRB reviewers who may be outside of the researcher’s field.) To create a monitoring device that allows people to listen to their own body sounds or to record them for medical purposes
Appendix B: Toxicological Investigations Genotoxicity – bacteria Notified polymer (< 60%) OECD TG 471 Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test. EC Directive 2000/32/EC B.13/14 Mutagenicity – Reverse Mutation Test using Bacteria. Plate incorporation procedure (pre-experiment and test 1)/Pre incubation procedure (test 2) Species/Strain S. typhimurium: TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100 E. coli: WP2uvrA Metabolic Activation System S9 fraction from phenobarbital/β-naphthoflavone induced rat liver in Main Test Pre-experiment/test 1 with and without metabolic activation: 0, 3, 10, 33, 100, 333, 1000, 2500 and 5000 µg/plate Test 2 with and without metabolic activation: 0, 33, 100, 333, 1000, 2500 and 5000 µg/plate Vehicle Deionised water Remarks - Method No deviations from the protocol. Metabolic Activation Test Substance Concentration (µg/plate) Resulting in: Cytotoxicity in Test Cytotoxicity in Main Test Precipitation Genotoxic Effect Absent > 5,000 Test 1 > 5,000 > 5,000 negative Test 2 > 5,000 > 5,000 negative Present > 5,000 Test 1 > 5,000 > 5,000 negative Test 2 > 5,000 > 5,000 negative Remarks - Results The plates incubated with the test substance showed normal background growth up to 5000 µg/plate with and without S9 mix in both main experiments. No toxic effects, shown as a reduction in the number of revertants, occurred in the test groups with and without S9 mix. No substantial increase in revertant colony numbers of any of the five test strains was observed following treatment with the test substance at any dose level, neither in the presence nor absence of S9 mix. There was also no tendency of higher mutation rates with increasing concentrations in the range below the border of biological relevance. The positive controls produced satisfactory responses, thus confirming the activity of the S9-mix and the sensitivity of the bacterial strains. The test substance was not mutagenic to bacteria under the conditions of the test. RCC (2006)
SUMMARY The following details will be published in the NICNAS Chemical Gazette: ASSESSMENT REFERENCE APPLICANT(S) CHEMICAL OR TRADE NAME HAZARDOUS INTRODUCTION VOLUME USE LTD/1711 Sika Australia Pty Ltd Dodecanoic acid, ester Yes 0.99 tonnes per annum Component of industrial sealants LTD/1712 Sika Australia Pty Ltd Dodecanoic acid, ester Yes 0.99 tonnes per annum Component of industrial sealants CONCLUSIONS AND REGULATORY OBLIGATIONS Hazard classification Based on the available information, the notified chemicals are recommended for hazard classification according to the Globally Harmonised System for the Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS), as adopted for industrial chemicals in Australia. The recommended hazard classification is presented in the following Table. Hazard classification Hazard statement Skin sensitisation (Category 1) H317 – May cause an allergic reaction Based on the available information, the notified chemicals are recommended for hazard classification according to the Approved Criteria for Classifying Hazardous Substances (NOHSC, 2004), with the following risk phrases: R43 May cause sensitisation by skin contact Human health risk assessment Under the conditions of the occupational settings described, the notified chemicals are not considered to pose an unreasonable risk to the health of workers. When used in the proposed manner, the notified chemicals are not considered to pose an unreasonable risk to public health. Environmental risk assessment On the basis of assessed use pattern, the notified chemicals are not considered to pose an unreasonable risk to the environment. Recommendations Hazard Classification and Labelling The notified chemicals should be classified as follows: H317 – May cause an allergic reaction The following classifications should be considered for use for products/mixtures containing the notified chemicals: Conc. ≥1%: H317 Health Surveillance
Age 16-18 yrs 19-21 yrs 22-35 yrs 36-45 yrs 46-64 yrs 65 yrs + Prefer not to say Disability Do you consider that you have a disability? Yes No Prefer not to say If Yes, please give brief details of the disability and any adjustments that would need to be made to enable you to carry out the duties listed for this post (continue on a separate sheet if necessary). Race Please read all the categories and then tick the box that applies to you White British Irish Any other white background (please state) Mixed race White and black Caribbean White and black African White and Asian Any other mixed background (please state) Asian or Asian British Indian Pakistani Bangladeshi Any other Asian background (please state) Black or Black British Caribbean African Any other black background (please state)
In the afternoon, we had the opportunity to visit Vilnius Regional Administrative Court where the president greeted us and explained the functioning of the administrative system. Wednesday, 17 September 2014 Vilnius 10:00 – 11:30 Visit to the Appeal Court of Lithuania (11:30 – 13:00 Lunch break 13:00 – 14:30 Visit to Vilnius Regional Court 14:30 – 16:00 Visit to the Supreme Court of Lithuania Thursday, 18 September 2014 Vilnius 10:00 – 12:00 Visit to the Prosecutor General’s Office 12:00 – 14:00 Lunch break 14:00 – 16:00 Visit to Vilnius City District Court Friday, 19 September 2014 Vilnius 9:30 – 11:00 Visit to Lukiskes Remand Prison – Closed Prison 11:00 – 13:00 Lunch break 13:00 Sightseeing in Trakai Sunday, 21 September 2014 Vilnius 11:40 – 13:30 Travel from Vilnius to Kaunas Monday, 22 September 2014 Kaunas 10:00 – 12:00 Visit to Kaunas District Court – building No 1 Introduction to activities performed by the court 12:00 – 13:00 Lunch break 13:00 – 15:00 Meeting with civil law (labour law, family law) and criminal law judges Observation of a court hearing 15:00 – 17:30 Sightseeing in Kaunas – Old Town, Pazaislis Monastery Tuesday, 23 September 2014 Kaunas 10:00 – 11:00 Visit to Kaunas District Court – building No 2 11:00 – 12:00 Visit to Kaunas Regional Court 12:00 – 13:00 Lunch break 13:00 – 15:00 Visit to Vytautas Magnus University 17:30 – 20:15 Travel from Kaunas to Klaipeda Wednesday, 24 September 2014 Klaipeda
Explanation of Long-Term Industry Projections Data Arkansas-Statewide 2016-2026 NAICS Code NAICS Title 2016 Estimated Employment 2026 Projected Employment Numeric Change Percent Change Industry code according to the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Title and Coding Structure Industry title according to the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Title and Coding Structure An estimate of the number of jobs in an industry in 2016 The projected number of jobs expected to be in an industry in 2026 Total number of jobs an industry is expected to gain or lose over the 2016 to 2026 period Percent Change in the number of jobs in an industry over the 2016 to 2026 period 2016-2026 Industry Projections by Major Division
SUMMARY The following details will be published in the NICNAS Chemical Gazette: ASSESSMENT REFERENCE APPLICANT(S) CHEMICAL OR TRADE NAME HAZARDOUS INTRODUCTION VOLUME USE LTD/1723 & LTD/1724 & LTD/1725 HP Australia Pty Ltd & DIC Australia Polymer 1 in PSS Additive & Polymer 2 in PSS Additive & Polymer 3 in PSS Additive ND* ≤ 10 tonne/s per annum Pigment for inks and paints *ND = not determined CONCLUSIONS AND REGULATORY OBLIGATIONS Hazard classification As no toxicity data were provided, the notified polymers cannot be classified according to the Globally Harmonised System for the Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS), as adopted for industrial chemicals in Australia, or the Approved Criteria for Classifying Hazardous Substances (NOHSC, 2004). Human health risk assessment Under the conditions of the occupational settings described, the notified polymers are not considered to pose an unreasonable risk to the health of workers. When used in the proposed manner, the notified polymers are not considered to pose an unreasonable risk to public health. Environmental risk assessment On the basis of the PEC/PNEC ratio and the reported use pattern, the notified polymers are not considered to pose an unreasonable risk to the environment. Recommendations Occupational Health and Safety A person conducting a business or undertaking at a workplace should implement the following engineering controls to minimise occupational exposure to the notified polymers in finished products: Enclosed, automated processes during reformulation, where possible. Adequate ventilation during reformulation processes and spray applications of products containing the notified polymer. A person conducting a business or undertaking at a workplace should implement the following safe work practices to minimise occupational exposure during handling of the notified polymers in final products: Avoid inhalation of aerosols A person conducting a business or undertaking at a workplace should ensure that the following personal protective equipment is used by workers to minimise occupational exposure to the notified polymers as introduced and in final products: Respiratory protection, if ventilation is inadequate Gloves Goggles
TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY 3 CONCLUSIONS AND REGULATORY OBLIGATIONS 3 ASSESSMENT DETAILS 6 1. APPLICANT AND NOTIFICATION DETAILS 6 2. IDENTITY OF CHEMICAL 6 3. COMPOSITION 6 4. PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES 7 5. INTRODUCTION AND USE INFORMATION 7 6. HUMAN HEALTH IMPLICATIONS 8 6.1. Exposure Assessment 8 6.1.1. Occupational Exposure 8 6.1.2. Public Exposure 9 6.2. Human Health Effects Assessment 10 6.3. Human Health Risk Characterisation 12 6.3.1. Occupational Health and Safety 12 6.3.2. Public Health 12 7. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS 12 7.1. Environmental Exposure & Fate Assessment 12 7.1.1. Environmental Exposure 12 7.1.2. Environmental Fate 13 7.1.3. Predicted Environmental Concentration (PEC) 13 7.2. Environmental Effects Assessment 14 7.2.1. Predicted No-Effect Concentration 14 7.3. Environmental Risk Assessment 14 Appendix A: Physical and Chemical Properties 15 Appendix B: Toxicological Investigations 17 B.1. Acute toxicity – oral 17 B.2. Irritation – skin 17 B.3. Irritation – eye (in vitro) 18 B.4. Skin sensitisation – human volunteers 18 B.5. Repeat dose toxicity 19 B.6. Genotoxicity – bacteria 20 B.7. Genotoxicity – in vitro 21 B.8. Reproduction/Developmental toxicity 22 Appendix C: Environmental Fate and Ecotoxicological Investigations 24 C.1. Environmental Fate 24 C.1.1. Ready biodegradability 24 C.2. Ecotoxicological Investigations 24 C.2.1. Acute toxicity to fish 24 C.2.2. Acute toxicity to aquatic invertebrates 25 C.2.3. Algal growth inhibition test 26 BIBLIOGRAPHY 28
SUMMARY The following details will be published in the NICNAS Chemical Gazette: ASSESSMENT REFERENCE APPLICANT(S) CHEMICAL OR TRADE NAME HAZARDOUS INTRODUCTION VOLUME USE LTD/1737 Givaudan Australia Pty Ltd Quinoline, Yes ≤ 1 tonne per annum Fragrance ingredient CONCLUSIONS AND REGULATORY OBLIGATIONS Hazard classification Based on the available information, the notified chemical is recommended for hazard classification according to the Globally Harmonised System for the Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS), as adopted for industrial chemicals in Australia. The recommended hazard classification is presented in the table below. Hazard classification Hazard statement Sensitisation, Skin (Category 1) H317 – May cause an allergic skin reaction Based on the available information, the notified chemical is recommended for hazard classification according to the Approved Criteria for Classifying Hazardous Substances (NOHSC, 2004), with the following risk phrase(s): Xi; R38: Irritating to the skin Xi; R43: May cause sensitisation by skin contact The environmental hazard classification according to the Globally Harmonised System for the Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) is presented below. Environmental classification under the GHS is not mandated in Australia and carries no legal status but is presented for information purposes. Hazard classification Hazard statement Acute Category 2 H401 - Toxic to aquatic life Chronic Category 2 H 411 - Toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects Human health risk assessment Under the conditions of the occupational settings described, the notified chemical is not considered to pose an unreasonable risk to the health of workers. When used at ≤ 0.03% in fine fragrances, ≤ 0.006% in other cosmetic products and ≤ 0.00075% in household products, the notified chemical is not considered to pose an unreasonable risk to public health. Environmental risk assessment On the basis of the PEC/PNEC ratio and the assessed use pattern, the notified chemical is not expected to pose an unreasonable risk to the environment. Recommendations Hazard Classification and Labelling The notified chemical should be classified as follows: Sensitisation, Skin (Category 1): H317 – May cause an allergic skin reaction
University Centre Cafeteria(s) ‘UC’ (second floor) School of Nursing ‘SN’ Port Arthur Collegiate – ‘PACI’ PACI Gymnasium Munro Street Centre - ‘CS’ Tungsten Street ‘MP’ Residence – Prettie Residence Residence – Bartley Residence Residence – Deer Lake Ridge Residence – North Residence Residence – South Residence Residence – North Sprit Heights Residence – Bearskin Lake Balmoral Street Centre – ‘HS’ Outpost Pub – LUSU TOTAL Annual Cost all Buildings Listed above Should the University choose to exercise any option years, pricing for these extensions will be negotiated with the winning proponent approximately ninety days in advance of the expiry of the initial contract term for each extension year. Continued next page. Appendix ‘C’ PRICING PROPOSAL Continued (Pg 3 of 3) Rates for Additional Cleaning – Initial Contract Term.
<insert national code and title> National Training Product Training package code and title: National qualification /course code and title: Qualification AQF level RMIT program code: Delivery year and semester School and program team attestation In signing this staff capabilities matrix we attest that the trainers/assessors listed in the matrix are compliant with the Standards for National VET Regulator (NVR) Registered Training Organisations 2011. School and Dean/Head of School Contact phone: Email: Program Manager Contact phone: Email: Version Control Strategy version number Date of this strategy dd/mm/yyyy Version number for this strategy – new (V1.0) or update (increment as appropriate) Date of next strategy review dd/mm/yyyy
Court title 06.11 The full title of the Court, including District Registry or County Court if appropriate Court case number 06.12/3 of Number given to the matter by the Court Registered name of Company 11.11 Former registered names 11.12 Any name under which the Company was registered in the 12 months prior to commencement of the proceedings Trading names or styles 11.13 Any name or style (other than registered names) under which the Company carried on business or incurred any debt owed Registered number 11.21 Leave blank if the Company is unregistered Registered office 11.31 Leave blank if the Company is unregistered Principal trading address 11.32 Leave blank if the Company is Date of appointment 21.11 Date of appointment of the Office Holder Date by which Creditors must submit their claims 42.11 Address to which Creditors must submit their claims 42.21 Name, IP number, firm and address of Office Holder 1 81.11-4 (IP No. ) , Details of first Office Holder Name, IP number, firm and address of Office Holder 2 81.21-4 (IP No. ) , Details of second Office Holder (leave blank if none) E-mail address or telephone number for contact 86.11 Either an e-mail address or a telephone number at which the Office Holder(s) can be contacted has to be provided Alternative person to contact with enquiries about the case 86.12 Inclusion of the name of an alternative contact is optional Where is this notice to be published? 91.11-2 London Gazette (if additional publicity required give details here) The notice must be Gazetted – additional publicity may be given if thought fit (see separate guidance)
substance was administered on each treatment site and the exposure period was 4 hours. Lesion Mean Score* Animal No. Maximum Value Maximum Duration of Any Effect Maximum Value at End of Observation Period 1 2 3 Erythema/Eschar 0 0.33 0 1 < 72 h 0 Oedema 0 0 0 0 N/A 0 *Calculated on the basis of the scores at 24, 48, and 72 hours for EACH animal. Remarks - Results Very slight erythema was observed in one of the three treated animals at the 48-hour observation period only. All signs of irritation were resolved at the 72-hour observation period. The notified polymer is slightly irritating to the skin. BSL (2009c) Irritation – eye Notified polymer OECD TG 405 Acute Eye Irritation/Corrosion. EC Council Regulation No 440/2008 B.5 Acute Toxicity (Eye Irritation). Species/Strain Rabbit/New White Number of Animals 3 (Females) Observation Period 72 hours Remarks - Method No significant deviation of protocol was noted. 0.1 ml of the test substance was administered for each treatment and Lesion Mean Score* Animal No. Maximum Value Maximum Duration of Any Effect Maximum Value at End of Observation Period 1 2 3 Conjunctiva: redness 0 0 0.33 1 < 48 h 0 Conjunctiva: chemosis 0 0 0 0 N/A 0 Conjunctiva: discharge 0 0 0 0 N/A 0 Corneal opacity 0 0 0 0 N/A 0 Iridial inflammation 0 0 0 0 N/A 0 *Calculated on the basis of the scores at 24, 48, and 72 hours for EACH animal. Remarks - Results Slight conjunctival redness in all three treated animals was observed at 1 hour after the exposure. Two of them recovered within 24 hours and one recovered in 48 hours. The notified polymer is slightly irritating to the eye. BSL (2009d) Skin sensitisation – mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA) Notified polymer OECD TG 429 Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay EC Directive 2004/73/EC B.42 Skin Sensitisation (Local Lymph Node Assay) Species/Strain Mouse/CBA/J Rj
To Start Dusted Calamari, sweet chilli dip, garlic slice £7.95 Whitebait, homemade Tartar Sauce £6.95 Whole Mini Camembert & Toasted Ciabatta. £7.95 Mains Award Winning Hand Made Pies £12 Steak and Kidney Tender British Farm Beef Steak and Kidney Slow cooked in gravy. Chicken Gammon and Leek Moist Chicken Breast traditional Gammon and Leeks in a white wine sauce. Stilton Mushroom and Onion Pudding All served with creamy mash and vegetables of the day. Hand carved Ham Egg and Chips £10.95 Breaded Chicken Tenders £9.95 From our Grill 8oz Rib Eye £16 Fresh from the fields of Kent. Supplied by Glovers of Hartley. With Grilled Tomato, Mixed Leaves, Onion Rings, & fries. Add a peppercorn sauce for £1.50 Burgers. £10.95 Malt Shovel 100 6oz steak Burger Crispy Chicken Burger Veggie Burger Brioche Bun, Lettuce, Mayo, Gherkins, Onion Rings, Chunky Fries, Coleslaw (Add Bacon 75p Add Cheese 75p) Salad of the Day: Chicken Caesar Salad. £11.95 Mixed Salad, Chicken, Bacon, Croutons. Fish Snacks and Sides Fries £2.55 Add Cheese for 75p. Sweet potato fries £2.95 Side Salad £ 2.50 Garlic Bread £2.95 Cheesy Garlic Bread £3.70 Onion Rings £2.95 Tea Coffee and Desserts. Range of Fresh Ground Coffee £1.95 Pot of Tea £1.75 Desserts all £4.75 please ask us for today’s selection.
The training was officially opened by Omary O. Makungu, Chief Justice of Zanzibar. Additional welcome remarks were provided by Hon. Tom B. Nyanduga, Chairperson of CHRAGG, and Ms. Louise Edwards, Programme Manager, on behalf of APCOF. Facilitators The training was facilitated by Louise Edwards, Mr. Sean Tait, Executive Director of APCOF, and Mr. Michael Dynes, Regional Police and Gendarmerie Delegate, International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). Attendees The training was attended by 50 officials, including representatives of CHRAGG, the Tanzania Police Force (TPF), the Tanzania Prison Service (TPS), Correctional Facilities (CF), and the Ministry of Constitutional and Legal Affairs. Attendees were drawn from across a number of regions, including Dar es Salaam, Zanzibar, Morogoro, Pwani, Unguja and Pemba. Programme Module 1: Introductory Session The training commenced with an overview of the Luanda Guidelines and the ACHPR’s focus on policing and pre-trial detention issues, facilitated by Louise Edwards (APCOF). Participants were sensitised on the structure of the Luanda Guidelines, which were made available for the training in Swahili by the ICRC. A short video on the causes and consequences of prolonged pre-trial detention, was screened, and was followed by a discussion on the extent to which the challenges identified by the ACHPR are reflected in the Tanzanian context. Module 2: What are human rights? How do they apply to policing? Louise Edwards (APCOF) led participants through a discussion on the normative framework for human rights in Africa, as developed by the ACHPR, and how it applies to law enforcement work. Participants were introduced to the Luanda Guidelines structure and content, and asked to compare the challenges identified by the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights in relation to a rights-based approach to arrest and detention across Africa to the situation in Tanzania. Module 3: Detention Sean Tait (APCOF) provided participants with information on the detention continuum, which begins at stop and search, and the extent to which the framework for arrest and detention in Tanzania complies with the requirements of the Luanda Guidelines. Module 4.1: Rule of Law and Non-Discrimination
EDUCATION RESEARCH INTERESTS Much of my research focuses on nonverbal social influence and its effects on consumer attitudes, perceptions, and motivations. My dissertation explores individual differences in consumers’ comfort with interpersonal touch and investigates these differences in various consumer contexts. I have broad interests in nonverbal communication, sensory marketing, and consumer privacy. PUBLICATIONS Luangrath, Andrea W., Joann Peck, and Victor A. Barger (forthcoming), “Textual Paralanguage and its Implications for Marketing Communications,” Journal of Consumer Psychology Webb, Andrea and Joann Peck (2015), “Individual Differences in Interpersonal Touch: On the Development, Validation, and Use of the 'Comfort with Interpersonal Touch' (CIT) Scale,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25 (1), 60-77. (Essay 1 of Dissertation) Peck, Joann, Victor A. Barger, and Andrea Webb (2013), “In Search of a Surrogate for Touch: The Effect of Haptic Imagery on Perceived Ownership,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23 (2), 189-196. MANUSCRIPTS UNDER REVIEW Webb, Andrea, Joann Peck, and Anders Gustafsson, “Don't Touch Me, But I Might Touch You: Inferences and Effects of Initiating and Receiving Interpersonal Touch,” Journal of Consumer Research. (Invited for 2nd Round Revision) (Essay 2 of Dissertation)
Alternative Liquids (only one per batch) Quantity Calories Carbo- Hydrates Grams Protein grams ml of liquid Almond Milk, Almond Breeze, ‘60’ on label 1 cup 60 8 1 250 Coconut Water, Coconut Dream brand 1 cup 60 3 0 250 Flax Milk, Good Karma brand 1 cup 50 8 0 250 Oat Milk, Oat Dream brand, ‘enriched’ 1 cup 120 17 3 250 Rice Milk, Rice Dream Brand, ‘fortified’ 1 cup 130 26 0 250 GOAT milk Whey 1 cup 60 6 20 250 ESTIMATE TO USE IN CALCULATION 80 15 ZERO ( 20 IF WHEY) Starches meal, no protein powder Quantity Calories Carbo- Hydrates Grams Protein grams ml of liquid TOTAL ON AVERAGE; in reality, it will vary 420 35 10 unless whey 30 300 Nutrition Data Lucie’s TOTAL DAILY INTAKE Obviously, the daily total will vary. What counts is that she reaches the Goal each day: 2000 calories / 130 carbohydrates / 100 protein / 1500 ml liquid Breakfast mix Calories Carbo- Hydrates Grams Protein grams ml of liquid TOTAL ON AVERAGE; in reality, it will vary 700 60 20 375 ESTIMATED TOTAL FOR AN AVERAGE GREEN SMOOTHIE; in reality, it will vary Calories Carbo- Hydrates Grams Protein grams ml of liquid Green Smoothie ESTIMATE, Lucie’s portion 250 15 10 250 Meat Broth Meal Calories Carbo- Hydrates Grams Protein grams ml of liquid
“Luckiest Time of All” test Who is the major character in “The Luckiest Time of All”? ___________________________ Point out three facts you learn about the major character: _________________________, _________________________, _________________________ Name one minor character:______________________. What do you learn about this character _____________________________________________________________________________ Setting Time: Early 1900s ______: ______ ______ Characters Major—_______________ Minor— _____________, _____________, _____________, _____________ Protagonist—_______________ Antagonist—_______________ Dynamic—_______________ Static—_______________, _______________, _______________
LIST OF LIFE MEMBERS OF AIBSNLREA, LUCKNOW BRANCH (As on 17.01.2017) Sl. No. NAME DOB LAST DESIGN. RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS Phone No. Quota paid 01 B M Mishra 05.11.1948 ADT 57 Manas Vihar Colony, Lucknow-226 016 0522-2312525 Rs 200/- 02 A L Gyanani 28.04.1944 ADT C-381 Rajaji Puram, Lucknow-226 017 0522-2318014 Rs 200/- 03 K B Gupta 01.04.1948 SDE C-55, Sector-K, Aliganj, Lucknow-226 014 0522-2745999 Rs 200/- 04 P D Shukla 15.11.1944 AGM C-1459, Rajaji Puram, Lucknow-226 017 0522-2414477 Rs 200/- 05 Radhey Shyam 31.01.1949 DE C-493/D, Indira Nagar, Lucknow-226 016 0522-2351855 Rs 200/- 06 K K Vaish .11.1947 AGM 1/12 Vishal Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow- 226 049 0522-2397800 Rs 200/- 07 R C Srivastava 25.12.1946 AGM 551Ka/425 Sukhlal Madhuban Nagar, Alambagh, Lucknow. 0522-2457222 Rs 200/- 08 Gopal Chandra 01.02.1946 SDE 36 Satyalok Colony, Sitapur Road, Lucknow-226 021 0522-2361313 Rs 200/- 09 R S Arora 25.05.1946 DE Sec-21/122 Indira Nagar, Lucknow-226 016. 0522-2715050 Rs 200/- 10 Mushir Hadi 01.07.1947 JTO Duldul House, Nazipura, Bahraich, UP 05252-231786 Rs 200/- 11 Ram Pal 15.01.1948 DE Ashok Nagar Colony, Hathauda Bujurg, Shajahanpur, UP. 05842-224512 Rs 200/-