consequential social and economic disparities. However, the Occupy protesters initially found it difficult find a credible media outlet for their message. In the late Autumn of 2011, this began to change, especially when they protested outside St Paul’s Cathedral in the City of London. The main agent for change, in both share of voice and eloquence of the protest, came, perhaps unexpectedly, from the Roman Catholic and Anglican Churches. The Vatican’s Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace (2011) called for the creation of a global system for managing a global economy and strongly backed the introduction of a Financial Transaction Tax. More recently, the Archbishop of Canterbury’s letter to the Financial Times (2011) argued that the societal unrest, evident in the Occupy protests, has deeply social, moral and economic causes. He went further to suggest that: ‘The protest at St. Paul’s was seen by an unexpectedly large number of people as the expression of a widespread and deep exasperation with the financial establishment that shows no signs of diminishing. There is still a powerful sense around – fair or not – of a whole society paying for the errors and irresponsibility of bankers; of impatience with a return to ‘business as usual’ … It isn’t easy to say what we should do differently. It is time we tried to be more specific.’ Whilst the financial sector has chided the Church for its involvement, it is well worth noting that, unlike politicians, the influence of the financial sector over the Church is relatively weak; and it is hard to dismiss the Church’s overall objectives and policy proposals. Unfortunately, the burgeoning crisis is yet to generate new thinking amongst They remain locked into narrow, nationally defined political silos, with only loosely held interests in international political and economic events, beyond those that directly affect their perceived national self-interests. Insular national governments are hardly a match for internationalized global business and finance. Yet, whatever scorn
So “this time” is fundamentally different than before. The problems in Western economies are deeply structural and ideological, resulting from nearly 40 years of economic liberalisation and financialisation. Reversing their effects will require a fundamental re-organisation and re-orientation of both national economies and the global economic system of which they form a part. References Abbas, M and A. Croft (2011) ‘Cameron Denies Austerity Drive Caused UK Riots’ Reuters. 11 August. Apps, P. (2011) ‘Analysis: Riots Shake Faith in UK Austerity, Stability.’ Reuters. 10 August. Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams (2011) ‘Time for Us to Challenge the Idols of High Finance.’ Financial Times. 1 November. Archbishop of Canterbury (1985) Faith in the City: The Archbishop of Canterbury’s Commission on Urban Priority Areas. London: Church House Publishing. Arndt, H.W. (1944) The Economic Lessons of the Nineteen-Thirties. London: Frank Cass. Barro, R (2009) ‘Government Spending is No Free Lunch: Now the Democrats are Peddling Voodoo Economics,’ Wall Street Journal, 22 January. Blankenburg, S and Palma, G. (2009), ‘Introduction: the global financial crisis’, Cambridge Journal of Economics. 33(4): 531-538. Boyer, R. (2012) ‘The Four Fallacies of Contemporary Austerity Policies.’ Cambridge Journal of Economics. 36(1): 000-000. Callinicos, A. (2012) ‘Contradictions of Austerity.’ Cambridge Journal of Economics. 36(1): 000-000.
Wade, R. and S. Sigurgeirsdottir (2012) ‘Iceland’s Rise, Fall, Stabilisation and Beyond.’ Cambridge Journal of Economics. 36(1): 000-000. Watkins, J. (2010) ‘Rescuing the Rentier – Neo-liberalism, Social Imbalance and the Current Crisis: A Synthesis of Keynes, Galbraith and Minsky.’ Journal of Economic Issues 44(2): 471-8. Wilkinson, F. (2012) ‘Wages, Economic Development and the Customary Standard of Life.’ Cambridge Journal of Economics. (forthcoming).