Please put a “” in appropriate box(es) to indicate the linkage between each module and PILOs or SILOs and specify the types of assessment employed to test learners’ achievement of the intended learning outcomes. (For terminal exit award) Programme Intended Learning Outcomes[1] Module Title PILO-1 PILO-2 PILO-3 PILO-4 PILO-5 Assessment Methods [1]Please use the same numbering for the PILOs as presented in 5.1.2. (For intermediate exit award) Programme Intended Learning Outcomes[1] Module Title PILO-1 PILO-2 PILO-3 PILO-4 PILO-5 Assessment Methods [1]Please use the same numbering for the PILOs as presented in 5.1.2. (For learning programmes with specific streams) Name of the Stream: Stream Intended Learning Outcomes[1] Module Title SILO-1 SILO-2 SILO-3 SILO-4 SILO-5 Assessment Methods [1]Please use the same numbering for the SILOs as presented in 5.1.2.
Please provide mapping of MILOs against the Generic Level Descriptors (GLD) of the QF or explanation on why the programme is pitched at the claimed QF level. Domain[1] MILOs GLD (QF Level ) GLD (QF Level ) Knowledge and Intellectual Skills Processes Application, Autonomy and Accountability IT and Numeracy Knowledge and Intellectual Skills Processes Application, Autonomy and Accountability IT and Numeracy K1 K2 ... P1 P2 … A1 A2 … C1 C2 … K1 K2 ... P1 P2 … A1 A2 … C1 C2 … Name of Module: Name of Module: … … [1] For details descriptions of the GLD, please refer to:
Staff Profile (please refer to the Explanatory Notes, Part II -6.2) Please provide a list of key staff and their profile in relation to the above appointment criteria. Position Name / (FT/PT) [1] Relevant Qualifications[2] (academic and professional with awarding body and year of awarding) Relevant Work Experience[2] (industry and teaching/training) Other Skills[2] (if any) Modules Teaching (if applicable) Management Staff Teaching/Training Staff Programme Administrative and Support Staff [1]Full-time – normally refers to appointment of service for not less than 35 hours a week [2]Operators can either complete the table or provide the detailed profile of individual teaching/training staff Staff number: Full-time staff __________ Part-time staff___________
Sources of Evidence: Flowchart showing the process for programme development and approval with responsible personnel/committees Appendix: Sample programme proposals/plans Appendix: Others: Appendix: Please describe the approach used to monitor programme delivery (e.g. class observation, internal review meetings, interim course evaluation). Sources of Evidence: Sample tools and records for programme monitoring, e.g. class observation form Appendix: Others: Appendix: Please describe the policy or activities for conducting programme review. Programme Review Activities Frequency Review Focus (e.g. learning outcomes, programme structure, admission requirement, QF credits) Tools Employed (e.g. questionnaire, statistical records) Follow-Up Procedures Sources of Evidence: Sample tools and records for programme review, e.g. questionnaires and summary statistics Appendix: Sample programme review template/report/meeting minutes Appendix: Summary of changes made to the programmes and follow up actions taken Appendix: Others: Appendix: Please explain the procedures for handling learners’ complaints. Sources of Evidence: Learners’ handbook or guidelines for complaint handling Appendix: Others: Appendix: Roles of Staff (please refer to the Explanatory Notes, Part II -8.3) Please provide details about the personnel and/or committees who are responsible for programme development, management and review.