zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
M&LF1 Manage a project Evidence Requirements PC Evidence of Performance Criteria: possible examples of evidence Behaviours Knowledge and Understanding General Industry specific Context specific PC1 PC2 PC3 PC4 PC5 PC6 Project terms of reference you have agreed and project plans that you have prepared: notes or minutes of meetings you have attended, and e-mails, memos, letters, project proposals, terms of reference, scoping or feasibility studies and other documents that you have written, to agree the objectives, scope, resources, plans and timescales with sponsors and stakeholders 3, 4, 5, 7 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 2, 3 1, 2, 3, 4 schedules, action plans, contingency plans, risk assessments, budgets, Gantt charts, network diagrams (eg CPA, PERT or Precedence diagrams) and other tools for planning the project that you have used 3, 5 1, 3, 6, 9, 13, 14 1, 2, 3 3, 6, 7, 11 notes or minutes from, and records of presentations at, briefings or meetings that you have organised, and e-mails, memos, letters you have sent to members of the project team and other stakeholders, to agree project plans and roles and responsibilities 4, 5, 6, 7, 9 2, 3, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 2, 3 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 procedure specifications, operational guidelines and other documents you have prepared to ensure that project team members perform to the required standard and to minimise risks to health and safety 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9 6, 9, 10, 11, 12 2, 3 6, 7, 9 personal statement (reflections on your role and performance in agreeing the project terms of reference, and organising and planning the project) 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10 1, 2, 3 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 PC7 Your records of monitoring and evaluating projects you have managed:
TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE PAGE NUMBER Purpose of Agreement Page 3 Article I – General Conditions of Contract Page 4 Article II – Management Rights Page 10 Article III – Union – Company Relations Page 10 Article IV – Grievance Procedure and Arbitration Page 14 Article V – Seniority Page 16 Article VI – Employment Conditions Page 19 Article VII – Employee Privileges Page 21 Article VIII – Pay Provisions Page 26 Article IX – Job Descriptions Page 29 Signature Page Page 30 Appendix A – Classification and Rates of Pay Page 31 Appendix B – Employee Benefits Plans Page 32
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRIAL MAGISTRATES COURT CITATION : 2018 WAIRC 00390 CORAM : INDUSTRIAL MAGISTRATE M. FLYNN HEARD : 18 2018 DELIVERED : THURSDAY, 28 2018 FILE NO. : M 213 OF 2017 BETWEEN : CLAIMANT AND Respondent CatchWords : INDUSTRIAL LAW (WA) – Summary judgment application by employer – Employee alleging contravention of grievance procedure in industrial agreement – Grievance procedure to be ‘dealt with in accordance with the principles of natural justice and due process’ – Claim has no reasonable prospects of success Legislation : Industrial Magistrates Court (General Jurisdiction) Regulation 2005 (WA) School Education Act 1999 (WA) School Curriculum and Standards Authority Act 1997 (WA) Industrial Relations Act 1979 (WA) Instruments : School Education Act Employees’ (Teachers and Administrators) General Agreement 2014 Case(s) referred to in reasons : Pannell v Pannell [2017] WAIRComm 834 Richard James Quinlivan v Austral Ships Pty Ltd [2003] WAIRComm 9633 United Voice v Minister for Health [2012] WAIRComm 312 smec Australia Pty Ltd v Valentine Falls Estate Pty Ltd [2011] WASCA 138 Casella v Hewitt [2008] WASCA 13 Department of Education and Training v Peter Hans Weygers [2009] WAIRComm 41 Tiver v University of South Australia [2014] FCA 1114
150% overtime rate applies. 24 30/5/15 76 ordinary hrs and 5.35 hrs at 150% and 8.3 hrs at 200% 38 ordinary hrs and 3.35 hrs at 150% and 8.3 hrs at 200%. 40 hrs annual leave taken and Company submits that leave loading of 117.5% applies. Company claim upheld. Timesheet in evidence supports Company calculations. 25. 13/6/15 76 ordinary hrs and 12.7 hrs at 150% overtime. 45.6 ordinary hrs and 3.29 hrs at 150% and 7.81 hrs at 125% Saturday rate. 32 hrs annual leave taken and Company submits that leave loading of 117.5% applies. Company claim upheld. Timesheet in evidence supports Company calculations. 26. 27/6/15 68.4 ordinary hrs and 5.43 hrs at 125% Saturday rate. 73.83 ordinary hrs. Company claim upheld. Timesheet in evidence supports Company calculations (no Saturday work in that fortnight.) 27. 25/7/15 76 ord hrs and 11.8 hrs overtime at 150%. 82.77 ord hrs (inc 8 hrs sick leave) and 5.03 hrs at 125% Saturday rate. CZ claim upheld. Timesheet in evidence shows CZ worked over 38 hrs before work on Saturday 18/7/15. 28. 8/8/15 76 ordinary hrs and 6.15 hrs overtime at 150%. 82.15 ordinary hrs (inc 8 hrs sick leave). CZ claim upheld. Timesheet in evidence shows hrs in excess of daily average of 7.6 hrs per day for days worked in fortnight. 29. 22/8/15 76 ordinary hrs and 8.15 hrs overtime. 60.15 ordinary hrs and 24 hrs annual leave. 24 hrs annual leave taken and Company submits that leave loading of 117.5% applies. Company claim upheld. Timesheet in evidence supports Company calculations. 30. 5/9/15 76hrs ordinary and 6.75 hrs overtime at 150% 81.08 hrs ordinary (inc 8 hrs sick). CZ claim upheld. Timesheet in evidence shows hours in excess of daily average of 7.6 hrs per day for days worked in fortnight.
time, overtime, weekend penalty rates, fares, clothing or any other entitlement whether arising under the award or pursuant to the contract of employment) the payment cannot be claimed as a set off against monies payable to cover some other incident of employment. A payment made on account of say ordinary time worked cannot be used in discharge of an obligation arising on some other account such as a claim for overtime. Whether or not the payment was for a particular incident of employment will be a question of fact in every case [45]. 19 For example, see s 6 of the Magistrates Court (Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 (WA). 20 The relevant TAFE records were admitted into evidence as exhibits 11, 12, 13 and 14. 21 Exhibit 12. 22 Exhibit 9 at page 2, amplified by oral evidence recorded in the transcript at page 205ff. 23 E.g. transcript at pages 79, 196; 206. 24 Exhibit 8 at pages 12-14. 25 Exhibit 8 at page 15. 26 Exhibit 8 at page 19. 27 The evidence of Mr Hlavaty in re-examination appears at page 167of the transcript. 28 The evidence of the Second Respondent in examination in chief appears at pages 207 – 210 of the transcript. 29 Exhibit 8 at pages 16 – 17. 30 Transcript at pages 54 – 74. 31 Exhibit 9 at pages 9 – 10. 32 Exhibit 8 at pages 44 – 45. 33 Exhibit 3 at paragraph 99 – 100. 34 Exhibit 3 at paragraph 108 – 125. 35 See exhibit 2, page 548 at row 109 ‘20 August 2014 has been treated as a rostered day off.’
M-950 R1 (5-12) Phase 1 Worksheet Directions: This worksheet is intended to help HOP applicants through the access approval procedures (Pub. 282, Ch. 3.6 - HOP Guidelines). Document all property owners within the limits of work, and work across the columns to determine whether an approval (letter or signed plan) or HOP application (M-950 A or M-945 A) is required. Please use the included sample approval letter template if warranted. Note: Continue to Phase 2 Worksheet if approval procedure is not resolved. All Property Owners within the Limits of Work Property Owner Address Property Impacted by Proposed Improvements (See Pub. 282, Ch. 3.7 - Approval Procedures)? Existing Driveway accessing SR? Driveway Needs Reconstructed, Relocated or Restricted? Approval Obtained? Application Obtained? Yes = Next Column Yes = Next Column Yes = Obtain Application Yes = End of procedure No = Continue to Phase 2 Worksheet Yes = End of procedure No = Continue to Phase 2 Worksheet No = No Approval Necessary No = Obtain Approval No = Obtain Approval 1 smith Yes No N/A 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Page 7. Panel 1. This panel takes up half of the first row. This panel is mostly black, with a jagged white bolt splitting the center, like lightning. There should be grey, chaotic shapes around its edges. Caption: With one eye gone, and the other intact, I felt like my mind was being rent in two. Panel 2. This panel should be almost completely dark, but should be a close-up, frontal-shot of a fork, liquid at the tip with blood. Caption (top): For a moment, I imagined myself sitting one-eyed at an easel trying to capture this. This seeing double. I wondered, if I did, whether Annie would understand. ANNIE/off: You’re insane, you’re—oh god. Caption (bottom): But it was an animal pain. I didn’t have what it took. I took the easier route. Panel 7. This panel takes up half of the third row. It is from ANNIE’s perspective as she rushes towards SHEYNA (zip lines to show the motion if that isn’t too distracting). SHEYNA has one eye a mess of crunched glass and blood, oozing something awful (it should not be drawn in the skeletal ANNIE-perspective style, but rather the gore should stand out against a shot that otherwise would be how SHEYNA sees the world without the glasses). The other eye is wide in surprise, not unlike the shocked shot of it before. Caption (above): A wave of relief hit me. Sfx: Squish ANNIE/off: This can’t be happening. I can’t be seeing this. Caption (below): As wave of pain hit me. Panel 8. This panel takes up the entire third row. Pitch black, a bead of dark red blood drips off the bottom right corner of the panel border. Caption (top): I was blind. I knew that someday, I would tell someone what I had seen, release it from my head onto their page. Caption (bottom): But right then, I would have given anything to be standing at the doorway, looking at Annie paint, with my own two eyes, having no real idea what I was seeing.
This Handbook is intended to ‘signpost’ you in all aspects of being a player, parent, spectator member etc. However, this is not intended to replace the ‘just ask’ philosophy upon which the club was founded! of Contents SUBJECT PAGE NUMBER Volunteering 2 Membership & RFU Registration 3 Child Welfare 4 Photos / authorisation 5 Safeguarding 6 Training & Fixtures 7 Coaching & Coaches 8 Facilities 9 Kit requirements 10 Shop 11 Festival & Tournaments 12 Tours 13 Key Contacts 14 Accessing the club website 15 Membership Form 16 Photo Consent Form 17 RFU Registration Form 18
RESPONSE OF AUSTRALIA TO THE VIEWS OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE RIGHTS OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES IN COMMUNICATIONS NO. 11/2013 (G.B. v AUSTRALIA) AND 13/2013 (M.L. v aUSTRALIA) The Australian Government (Australia) presents its compliments to the members of the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (the Committee). Australia has given careful consideration to the Views of the Committee expressed in Communications No. 11/2013 (G.B. v Australia) and 13/2013 (M.L. v Australia), adopted 1 April 2016 and published 25 April 2016. These Views have been published on the website of the Australian Attorney-General’s Department. Australia acknowledges its obligations under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (the Convention) and takes its obligations under international human rights law seriously. The NSW Government is committed to removing structural and attitudinal barriers to access and participation that impact on the lives of persons with disabilities. It seeks to foster an inclusive society that enables persons with disabilities to fulfil their potential as equal participants in society. However, Australia respectfully disagrees with a number of the Committee’s views that Australia has violated the authors’ rights under the Convention. Article 5(1) and (3) – Equality and Nondiscrimination The Committee formed the view that ‘while the State party argues that the use of [Auslan interpreters/stenographers] has an impact on the complexity, cost and duration of trials, it does not provide any data or analysis to demonstrate that it would constitute a disproportionate or undue burden’. It further considered that ‘while the confidentiality principle of jury deliberations must be observed, the State party does not provide any argument justifying that no adjustment could be made to enable the Auslan interpreter to perform his/her functions without affecting the confidentiality of the deliberations of the jury such as a special oath before a court’. The Committee also accepted that States parties ‘enjoy a certain margin of appreciation’ in assessing the reasonableness and proportionality of accommodation measures, but must ensure ‘that such an assessment is made in a thorough and objective manner, assessing all the pertinent elements’. The Committee concluded that Australia had refused to provide
Briefly describe the family’s current circumstances and reasons for coming to M-PACT programme Details: Are there any previous or current mental health problems (eg Self harm, eating disorders, depression)? Details: Are any of the family members currently taking medication? Details: Is the family currently involved with other agencies eg social services, CPN etc? Details: Are there any family members who have any hearing, visual or mobility problems? Details: Are there any literacy or learning difficulties within the family? Details: Is there any further information we should know about the family? Details: Please send to: Email: For advice and support with completing this referral please contact: Referrer’s name: Organisation: Tel: Email:
Appendices Appendix 1 Appendix 1- Protein assay Standard Curves: A) BCA standard curve; B) Bradford standard curve. Appendix 2 PMID Name PA/Eth PAO/Eth P84099 Full=60S ribosomal protein L19 1.46155 0.876825 O35379 Multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 0.998805 0.61701
I 1 ENG 6001 Research Methodology 50 100 3 4 I 2 ENG 6002 Contemporary World Literature 50 100 3 4 I 3 ENG 6003 Contemporary Literary Theories 50 100 3 4 II 4 ENG 6099 Dissertation and Viva 200 12 Total 24 SEMESTER – I Course – I Code ENG 6001 Periods3 / Credits: 4 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY Unit 1 Research and Writing What does a research paper mean? Selecting a topic Conducting research Compiling a working bibliography Outlining and writing drafts 5
M-STEP and the importance of parent engagement on these issues, these following options and supporting documents have been designed for your use. Communication Options When By Whom Sample Docs Communicate with parents via newsletters, parent nights, or email to familiarize them with M-STEP. Videos, presentations and handouts are available on the . Various times throughout the year District & Bldg Leaders Notify board, district, and building staff of pending state data release. Distribute talking points and elevator speech to raise awareness before release of results. August District & Bldg Leaders Provide principals with a district parent letter to accompany M-STEP/MME parent reports. August Superintendent, Bldg Leaders Issue press release announcing student reports and aggregate scores and distribute information to staff and board. Within a few days of state data release Supt Schedule M-STEP agenda item for board members, staff meetings. August - September District & Bldg Leaders Ensure building, district, and board leaders discuss preliminary results during board and staff meetings, back-to-school and other fall school events, as appropriate. August - September Board, District & Bldg Leaders, Staff Locally developed using State Add M-STEP results article(s) to newsletters and appropriate parent publications. September District & Bldg Leaders Get district leaders on the agendas of local business and community meetings. Distribute overview and answer questions. Sept.– Nov. District Leaders Share positive M-STEP news articles, columns, or social media via newsletters, district social media, and appropriate parent publications. Sept. – Nov. District & Bldg Leaders Prepare presentations for stakeholder groups. Various times as available District leaders
2016 M-STEP Test Reporting Tools (For School and District Use) Anticipated Timeline / Communication Options—REPORTING M-STEP assessments are given in the spring and measure current-year student achievement. Recognizing the many new features in the 2016 M-STEP and the importance of parent engagement on these issues, these following options and supporting documents have been designed for your potential use. Communication Options When By Whom Sample Docs Meet with district/building leaders for issue briefing, discussion of potential concerns. August 2016 Supt ---- Communicate with parents via newsletters, parent nights, or email to familiarize them with M-STEP. Videos, presentations and handouts are available on the Aug.-Sept. 2016 District & Bldg Leaders Overview Make M-STEP results an agenda item for board members, staff meetings. Distribute talking points and elevator speech. Sept. 2016 District & Bldg Leaders - Ensure building, district and board leaders discuss anticipated results during back-to-school and other fall school events, as appropriate. Aug. – Sept. 2016 Board, District & Bldg Leaders, Staff - Identify parents, staff, and local business & community leaders willing to support and speak out on district’s behalf when asked. August – Sept. 2016 District & Bldg Leaders
Add M-STEP results article(s) to newsletters and appropriate parent publications. Sept. 2016 District & Bldg Leaders - Submit op-ed to local newspaper(s) OR Post to a blog One week prior to aggregate score release Supt Activate community action team; encourage them to respond to op-ed/blog with supportive letters to the editor. Immediately following publication of op-ed #1 Supt Provide principal cover letter, “how-to” flyers to parents (e-mailed, backpacks, website, parent nights) Sept.–Oct. 2016 District & Bldg Leaders - Present aggregate scores to District Board of Education. Within 1 month of release Supt Locally developed using Get district leaders on the agendas of local business, community meetings. Distribute overview and answer questions. Sept.– Nov. 2016 District Leaders Issue press release announcing student reports and aggregate scores Within a few days following report distribution Supt Sample Presentation for stakeholder groups. Various District leaders Add positive M-STEP news articles and columns to newsletter, social media, and appropriate parent publications. Sept. – Nov. 2016 District & Bldg Leaders M-STEP School/District Talking Points – REPORTING #13
Yashwantrao Chavan School of Rural Development M.Tech Rural Technology Shivaji University, Kolhapur Merit List 2016-17 Sr. No Seat No. Name of Student Category Marks of Exam ( Out of 150) Marks of GD ( Out of 25) Marks of PI ( Out of 25) Total ( Out of 200) Other Uni. Eligibility 1 7071 Powar pravin baliram Open 111 17 19 147 Other Eligible 2 7057 Bhosale Abhay Sanjay open 102 19 17 138 Eligible 3 7068 Pandhare Mauli Kumar NT(C)-1 96 20 16 132 Eligible 4 7064 Kamble Vaibhav Shamrao SC-1 94 18 18 130 Eligible 5 7066 Kore Vijay S. OPEN 91 18 18 127 Eligible 6 7059 Dewale Ajit Ramchandra OPEN 84 21 15 120 Eligible 7 7074 Shengane Swati Anil OPEN 84 17 19 120 Eligible 8 7069 Pol Tejas Gajanan SC-2 84 18 18 120 Eligible 9 7072 Rabade Snehal S OPEN 83 18 18 119 Eligible 10 7073 Shaikh Ruksar M. OPEN 79 18 18 115 Eligible 11 7065 Kambale Vivek Raghunath SC-3 72 20 16 108 Eligible Desai S. B Salunkhe M. S. Assistant Director Co-Ordinator YCSRD/SUK YCSRD/SUK
M- and P-Series Series System Pre-Commissioning and Installation Check List SYSTEM: NO. SYSTEM AND INSTALLATION STATUS REMARKS 1 Installation Location Outdoor Unit Rooftop Other Location ( ) 2 Maintenance Accessibility Outdoor Unit Indoor Units Good Poor Good Poor 3 Furthest Piping Length Outdoor to Indoor: Ft. 4 Height Difference (Multiple Only) Outdoor to Indoor: Ft. Indoor to Indoor: Ft. 5 Standard of Pipe-work Good Poor 6 Standard of Pipe Insulation Good Poor 7 Connection of Power Source Outdoor Unit Indoor Unit(s) Electrical Wire Good Poor Good Poor Type: Size: 8 Connection of Control System Indoor – RC Good Poor 9 Standard of Electrical Insulation Good Poor 10 Access to Remove Electrical Covers Good Poor 11 Control Method Wired Wireless 12 Remote Controller Operation Ventilation Cool / Heat Automatic Good Poor Good Poor Good Poor 13 Connection of Options Good Poor OUTDOOR UNIT: NO. OUTDOOR UNIT OPERATION STATUS REMARKS 14 Outdoor Unit Details Model No: Serial No: 15 Compressor Details Model No: Serial No: 16 Power Source (Voltage) L1 - N V L2 - N V L3 - N V Gnd – N V 17 Vibration / Noise Compressor Fan Good Poor Good Poor 18 Additional Refrigerant Charge (if applicable) Oz. 19 Outdoor Unit Address (if applicable) 20 Ambient Air Temp. REMARKS:
Mid-Term Self Evaluation Rating: 4=Excellent, 3=Good, 2=Average, 1=Fair, 0=Unsatisfactory, NA=Not applicable Performance 4 3 2 1 0 NA Comments Displays sound decision-making Brings an adequate amount of education/training to internship Accepts and follows directions Self-motivated/follows through with tasks on own initiative Displays problem-solving skills Demonstrates flexibility and readily adapts to new situations/ responsibilities Professionalism 4 3 2 1 0 NA Comments Projects a professional image Reports to/departs from internship site on time Maintains a satisfactory attendance report Days absent Days present Accepts and implements constructive criticism Adapts to physical demands of the job Exhibits dedication to profession Overall Evaluation Suggest professional development activities which the intern might undertake to strengthen performance:
Lawrence Buell : Ralph Waldo Emerson: A Collection of Critical Essays : Critical essays on Ralph Waldo Emerson : Critical Companion to Ralph Waldo Emerson: A Literary Reference to His Life and Work , : The Cambridge Companion to Ralph Waldo Emerson John Berger Berger, John. Ways of Seeing. Penguin Books, 1990. (Reprint) Merrifield, Andy. John Berger. Reaktion Books, 2013. Roberts, John. The Art of Interruption: Realism, Photography, and the Everyday. Manchester University Press, 1998 : Selected Literary Essays : Writing Essays About Literature
based Seminar-IV GEO. Dissertation/Project work/Academic activities and Viva voce - - 8 8 - - - - 200 Elective courses: Select any one special group based on specialisation from the followings: Group A GEO. Gender, Health and Development 4 1 - 4 25 25 25 25 100 GEO. Gender, Health and Development - - 4 2 - 25 - 25 50 Group B GEO. Digital Image Processing and Spatial analysis 4 1 - 4 25 25 25 25 100 GEO. Digital Image Processing and Spatial analysis -Practical - - 4 2 - 25 - 25 50 Group C GEO. Geography of Urban System and Planning 4 1 - 4 25 25 25 25 100 GEO. Geography of Urban System and Planning -Practical - - 4 2 - 25 - 25 50 Group D GEO. Disaster Preparedness and Management 4 1 - 4 25 25 25 25 100 GEO. Disaster Preparedness and Management - Practical - - 4 2 - 25 - 25 50 Group E GEO. Agriculture Geography of North-west India 4 1 - 4 25 25 25 25 100 GEO. Agriculture Geography of North-west India - Practical - - 4 2 - 25 - 25 50 Total 12 3 12 24 - - - - 600 Grand total 68 16 40 96 - - - - 2400 A: Continuous Assessment: Based on Objective Type Tests B: Mid-Term Test-1: Based on Objective Type and Subjective Type Test C: Mid-Term Test-2: Based on Objective Type and Subjective Type Test D: End-Term Exam (Final): Based on Objective Type Tests E: Total Marks L: Lectures T: Tutorial P: Practical Cr: Credits
M. COM :FIRST SEMESTER PAPER- 413: BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT & LEGAL FRAMEWORK Duration: 3 Hrs. Marks: (External- 70: Internal- 30) Objective – The course is aimed at acquainting the students with the nature and dimensions of the evolving environment in India which influence managerial decisions. Course Contents: Unit - I Nature and significance of environmental analysis for business decisions, Dimensions of Business Environment: Economics, Technological, Socio-cultural, Political, Legal-Regulatory and market Conditions; General and specific relevance of environmental conditions. Unit - II Economic environment: Economic Policy - An overview Changes in Government policies since 1991. Impact of liberalization, globalization, and structural reforms, Import policy and its domestic and international implications, Financial Sector reforms. Unit - III Technological environment: Dynamics of technological environment; Challenge of technology upgradation, Impact of foreign investment and foreign collaboration. Unit - IV Socio-cultural environment: Demographic profile. Class structure and mobility.Rural- urban convergence.Changes in consumption habits and life styles.Social responsibilities of business. Unit - V Political environment: Impact of competing political ideologies, political stability and instability on business activities. Unit - VI Market environment: Competitive conditions. Impact of entry of MNCs. Suggested Readings: Cherunilam, Francis, Business Environment, Himalaya Pub. House, 1996. Ghosh, P.K.Business and Government, 1998 Sultan Chand, Delhi. Devis, Keith, and Blomstrom, Robert L, Business and Society: Environment and Responsibility, 1975. Ghosh, P.K. and Kapoor ,G.K.Business Policy and Environment, 1998, Sultan Chand, Delhi. Adhikary, M. Economics Environment of Business (latest ed.), Sultan Chand, Delhi. Jalan, B., India's Economic Crises, 1991. Oxford Univ. Press, New Delhi. Dhingra, I.C., The Indian Economy: Environment and Policy, 1998, Sultan Chand, Delhi.
SEW Navyuga Barwani Tollways Pvt. Ltd. Khalghat – MP/MH Border Section from Ch.84.700 to Ch.167.850 on NH-3 Details of Hospital & Police Stations Sl. No. Chainage Police Stations Hospitals Name Contact Number Name Doctor /` In- Charge Contact Number No. of Beds if Available 1 82 Dhamnod 07291 – 233026 Community Health Center - Dhamnod Dr. Khesagi - 30 2 86 Khalghat CP 088890-52598 Community Health Center - Dhamnod Dr. Khesagi - 30 3 96 Thikri 07284 - 267224 Community Health Center – Thikri Dr. D.S. Chouhan 96696-16639 07284-267611 30 4 125 Balakwada 07285 - 268623 Primary Health center - Julwaniya Dr. Kadam 98935-18268 07284-266544 20 5 128 Julwaniya 07284-266243 Primary Health center - Julwaniya Dr. kadam 98935-18268 - 6 139 Nagalwadi 07281-275228 Civil Hospital – Sendhwa Dr. Suresh Chouhan 98268-80837 07281-223302 60 7 146 Sendhwa - Grameen 07281-228164 Civil Hospital – Sendhwa Dr. Suresh Chouhan 98268-80837 07281-223302 60 8 167 Bijasini Check Post 9637426718 Civil Hospital – Sendhwa Dr. Suresh Chouhan 98268-80837 07281-223302 60
Status of Control Room/Emergency Contact Information Help Line No. +919685094007 (24 hours) Establishment Contact Details Name Name, Address E-mail Address Telephone Project Director, NHAI National Highways Authority of India, 15, Sampat Hills, Bicholi Mardana, Indore-Dewas, By pass, Indore(MP) - 452018 Tel-Fax: 0731-2491433 9425316522 Team Leader, IC First floor A.B. Road, Near Indane Gas Agency, Dhamnod, (Dhar)-454552 mssureshcivil@yahoo.co.in 9644837421 Team SEW Navayuga Barwani Tollways Pvt.Ltd, Ch.141+850 Village – Jamli, Tahsil- Sendhwa, Dist- Barwani MP-453441 or 9685038007
PUNJABI UNIVERSITY, PATIALA OUTLINES OF TESTS, SYLLABI AND COURSES OF READING FOR MASTER OF SCIENCE (IT) FIRST YEAR (ANNUAL EXAMINATION) 2018 AND 2019 EXAMINATIONS PUNJABI UNIVERSITY PATIALA 147 002 M.Sc. (IT) First Year (Annual Examination) 2018 and 2019 Examination Univ. Exam Marks Int. Ass. Marks MS(A)-111 Introduction to Information Technology 80 20 MS(A)-112 Computer Programming using C 80 20 MS(A)-113 Computer Organization & Architecture 80 20 MS(A)-114 Mathematical Foundation of Computer Science 80 20 MS(A)-115 Operating Systems 80 20 MS(A)-116 Programming Lab-I 60 40 MS(A)-121 Object Oriented programming Using C++ 80 20 MS(A)-122 Data & File Structures 80 20 MS(A)-123 Visual Basic 80 20 MS(A)-124 RDBMS & Oracle 80 20
AEC-FNCCI, 2070. Agriculture Mechanization policy-2070 final Draft, Kathmandu: Agro Enterprise Center- Federation of Nepalese Chambers of Commerce and Industry. AMI, 1967-84. Research Reports, s.l.: Agricultural Mechanization Institute. Datta, S. K. D., 1981. Principles and Practices of Rice Production. Philippines: A Wiley-Interscience publication, JOHN WILEY & SONS. DOAEngineering, 2012. Directorate of Agricultural Engineering. [Online] Available at: http://doaengg.gov.np/index.php?page=bikas-prayas [Accessed 6 August 2015]. FAO, 2012. FAO Statistical Year Book 2012, Part three Feeding the world, Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization. Gami, V. & Justice, S., 1998. Preliminary Report: Women Farmer Participatory Testing and Evaluation of the IRRI 6-Row Rice Transplanter in Rupendehi District. In: P. R. Hobbs & N. P. Rajbhandari, eds. Proceedings of Rice-Wheat Research Workshop, 1-3 October 1997, Hotel Shangri-La, Kathmandu, Nepal. Mexico: Nepal Agricultural Research Council (NARC), International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) and Rice-Wheat System Research Consortium, pp. 91-94.
requesting him to award pass marks. 11. Copying detected on the basis of internal evidence, such as, during valuation or during special scrutiny. Cancellation of the performance in that subject and all other subjects the candidate has appeared including practical examinations and project work of that semester/year examinations. 12. If any malpractice is detected which is not covered in the above clauses 1 to 11 shall be reported to the Examination committee for further action to award suitable punishment. Malpractices identified by squad or special invigilators Punishments to the candidates as per the above guidelines. SRI VENKATESWARA COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TEHNOLOGY (AUTONOMOUS) R.V.S Nagar, Chittoor – 517127, A.P Scheme of Instruction for M.Tech (EPS) I M.Tech, I Semester S.No Course Code Subject Hours/ week Credits Scheme of Examination (Maximum Marks) L T P Internal External Total 1 14BPS01 Operation and Control of Power Systems 4 1 - 4 40 60 100 2 14BPS02 Power System Control & Stability 4 1 - 4 40 60 100 3 14BPS03 Reactive Power Compensation and Management 4 1 - 4 40 60 100 4 14BPS04 Modeling and Analysis of HVDC Transmission Systems 4 1 - 4 40 60 100 5 Elective - I 4 1 - 4 40 60 100 14BPS05 Signal Processing Techniques in Power Systems 14BPS06 EHVAC Transmission 14BPS07 Optimization Techniques in Power Systems 6 Elective - II 4 1 - 4 40 60 100 14BPS08 Advanced Computer Methods in Power
GURU NANAK DEV ENGINEERING COLLEGE, LUDHIANA ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT TIME TABLE FOR M. TECH (PART TIME) CLASSES July – Nov. 2018 Time Days Saturday Sunday BATCH 2018 & 2017 (1st and 3rd Sem) 9:30 AM-11:00 AM Open Elective Open Elective 11:00 AM- 1:00 PM Digital Control System (MTEE-502) G – 5 (PF. BHAWANA) Power System Operation & Control (MTEE-506) G – 5 (KSK) 1:00 PM – 1:30 PM -- BREAK -- 1:30 PM- 3:30 PM Power System Operation & Control (MTEE-506) G – 5 (SG) Digital Control System (MTEE-502) G – 5 (SKG) BATCH 2016 (5th Sem) 9:30 AM-11:00 AM Open Elective Open Elective 11:00 AM- 12:30 PM Renewable Energy Resources (MTEE-615) G – 4 (GKG) Renewable Energy Resources (MTEE-615) G – 4 (AD) 12:30 PM – 1:00 PM -- BREAK -- 1:00 PM- 2:00 PM Pre Thesis Seminar (MTEE-509) Computational Lab (ASG) Pre Thesis Project (MTEE-510) Computational Lab (BSA) 2:00 PM- 3:00 PM Pre Thesis Project (MTEE-510) Computational Lab (ASG) H.O.D. (EE)
9 2013 Dynamic Analysis of Water Tank With Interaction Between Fluid & Structure Best M. Tech thesis Award : Alumni Association of COEP, 21st September 2013 External Examiner: Dr. Makarand Barve, Udhe India, Pune. Anupama N. Ramnavamiwale 10 2013 Analysis of Bridge as Per IRC:6-2000 and IRC:6-2010 with Special Emphasis on Bearings and Foundations Industry : M. B. Gharpure and Associates, Pune Dr. Avinash Joshi. External Examiner : Mr. Shashikant Limaye, Pune Prathmesh P. Shankardas 11 2013 Passive Control Strategies for Response Control of Tallest Steel Building in India: Industry oriented project : Sterling Engineering, Mumbai Industry : Sterling Engineering, Mumbai Mr Girish Dravid. External Examiner: Dr. Makarand Barve, Udhe India, Pune. Sudhir S. Supanekar
Requirements Working Group Agenda followed by Minutes 9 July 2013 Agenda Discuss charter and NIST guidelines Brainstorm about work of Requirements WG What to do and how to do it? What to do Collect Use Cases Specific examples Generalization to similar use cases Need to define format of a use case so can generate abstractions Use cases linked to abstractions/generalizations of features as below Refine abstractions and link to use cases Network, Storage, Compute needs Infrastructure/Architecture Requirement (NoSQL v SQL, MapReduce v MPI, Clouds v HPC...) Data size v Compute Size Data centralized or distributed See Bob Marcus document for more examples Algorithms needed; Implementation needed (e.g. parallel or GPU versions) Security&Privacy Training or Expertise needed How to do it or Process to follow Gather documents and URL's/Citations Agree on approach; formats & methodology of giving input Specify in WG meeting Edit document on Google docs Upload to Interactions with other WG Contact other individuals and organizations that can contribute use cases etc. Minutes We reviewed the NIST guidelines and discussed the proposed agenda items. The general plan was agreed but a detailed plan to go forward was not fully formulated. The chat text below gives details on discussion of use cases (at what level should they be presented (technology -- user perspective -- application perspective) and the importance of agreeing on a template. We also discussed collaboration technology to use (Wiki v Google docs)
Division: Regulatory Services Job Title: Street Warden Grade: 4 Post Number: M005 Essential Desirable How assessed Qualifications Educated to GCSE Grade C or above in 4 Subjects including Maths and English App/Doc Experience Experience in an enforcement role Experience in conducting PACE interviews Experience in working in a performance related framework Experience in preparing case files for presentation in court Or Demonstrable experience identified within the section below. App/Int App/Int App/Int App/Int App/Int Skills/Knowledge Working knowledge of Computer systems i.e., Microsoft office and excel spread sheets etc. To be able to use initiative in analysing and resolving day-to-day problems as they occur Working knowledge of relevant legislation Knowledge of Health & Safety requirements and procedures App App/Int App/Int App Knowledge of RIPA Ability to set and use surveillance equipment such as CCTV cameras App App
Variability (rate of change) None Big Data Science (collection, curation, analysis, action) Veracity (Robustness Issues) Cannot tolerate data loss. Visualization TBD Data Quality Unknown. Data Types Scanned documents Data Analytics Only after 75 years. Big Data Specific Challenges (Gaps) Preserve data for a long time scale. Big Data Specific Challenges in Mobility TBD Security & Privacy Requirements Title 13 data. Highlight issues for generalizing this use case (e.g. for ref. architecture) . More Information (URLs) NBD(NIST Big Data) Requirements WG Use Case Template Use Case Title National Archives and Records Administration Accession NARA Accession, Search, Retrieve, Preservation Vertical (area) Digital Archives Author/Company/Email Quyen Nguyen & Vivek Navale (NARA) Actors/Stakeholders and their roles and responsibilities Agencies’ Records Managers NARA’s Records Accessioners NARA’s Archivists Public users Goals Accession, Search, Retrieval, and Long term Preservation of Big Data. Use Case Description Get physical and legal custody of the data. In the future, if data reside in the cloud, physical custody should avoid transferring big data from Cloud to Cloud or from Cloud to Data Center. Pre-process data for virus scan, identifying file format identification, removing empty files Index Categorize records (sensitive, unsensitive, privacy data, etc.) Transform old file formats to modern formats (e.g. WordPerfect to PDF) E-discovery Search and retrieve to respond to special request Search and retrieve of public records by public users Current Compute(System) Linux servers
Netflix competition (to improve ratings by 10%) combined over 100 different algorithms. Big Data Specific Challenges (Gaps) Analytics needs continued monitoring and improvement. Big Data Specific Challenges in Mobility Mobile access important Security & Privacy Requirements Need to preserve privacy for users and digital rights for media. Highlight issues for generalizing this use case (e.g. for ref. architecture) Recommender systems have features in common to e-commerce like Amazon. Streaming video has features in common with other content providing services like iTunes, Google Play, Pandora and Last.fm More Information (URLs) by Xavier Amatriain Note: <additional comments>
Security Reference Architecture Architectural Component: Interface of Sources Transformation Architectural Component: Interface of Transformation Uses Architectural Component: Interface of Transformation Data Infrastructure Architectural Component: Internal to Data Infrastructure Architectural Component: General Mapping Use Cases to Reference Architecture Cargo Shipping Use Case (Image from William Miller) Sources Transformation: End-Point Input Validation Ensuring integrity of data collected from sensors Real Time Security Monitoring Sensors can detect abnormal temperature/environmental conditions for packages with special requirements. They can also detect leaks/radiation. Data Discovery and Classification Secure Data Aggregation Aggregating data from sensors securely Transformation Uses: Privacy preserving data analytics and dissemination Sensor collected data can be private and can reveal information about the package and geo-information. Revealing such information needs to be privacy preserving. Compliance with regulations Govt access to data and freedom of expression concerns Dept of Homeland Security may monitor suspicious packages moving into/out of the country.
Transformation Uses: Privacy preserving data analytics and dissemination Sensor collected data can be private and can reveal information about the package and geo-information. Revealing such information needs to be privacy preserving. Compliance with regulations Govt access to data and freedom of expression concerns Dept of Homeland Security may monitor suspicious packages moving into/out of the country. Transformation Data Infrastructure: Data Centric Security such as identity/policy-based encryption Policy management for access control Private, sensitive sensor data, package data should only be available to authorized individuals. Third party companies like LoJack have low level access to the data. Computing on the encrypted data: searching/filtering/deduplicate/fully homomorphic encryption Audits Data Infrastructure: Securing Data Storage and Transaction logs Logging sensor data is essential for tracking packages. They should be kept in secure data stores. Key Management For encrypted data. Security Best Practices for non-relational data stores Diversity of sensor types and data types may necessitate use of data stores. Security against DoS attacks Data Provenance Meta-data should be cryptographically attached to the collected data, so that the integrity of origin and progress can be ensured.
Pharma Clinical Trial Data Sharing General Description of the Industry / Use Case: Under an industry trade group proposal, clinical trial data for new drugs will be shared outside intra-enterprise warehouses. Regulatory submissions commonly exceed “millions of pages.” Mapping to the Security Reference Architecture: RA Component Security & Privacy Topic Use Case Mapping Sources → Transformation End-Point Input Validation Opaque – company-specific Real Time Security Monitoring None Data Discovery and Classification Opaque – company-specific Secure Data Aggregation 3rd party aggregator Transformation → Uses Privacy-preserving Data Analytics Data to be reported in aggregate but preserving potentially small-cell demographics Compliance with Regulations Responsible developer & 3rd party custodian Govt access to data and freedom of expression concerns None considered: research limited community use; possible future public health data concern. Clinical Study Reports only, but possibly selectively at study-, patient-level Transformation ↔ Data Infrastructure Data Centric Security such as identity/policy-based encryption TBD Policy management for access control Internal roles; 3rd party custodian roles; researcher roles; participating patients’ physicians Computing on the encrypted data: searching/filtering/deduplicate/fully homomorphic encryption TBD Audits Release audit by 3rd party Securing Data Storage and Transaction logs TBD Key Management Internal varies by firm; external TBD Security Best Practices for non-relational data stores TBD Security against DoS attacks Unlikely to become public Data Provenance TBD – critical issue
A person may have a home loan with a different or same bank as a personal bank or each may be different organizations for the same person. A person may be “the insured” on health, life, auto, homeowner or renters insurance. A person may be the beneficiary or future insured person by a payroll deduction in the private sector, or via the employment development department in the public sector. A person has been educated by one or more public or private schools A person may be an employee, temporary worker, contractor or third party employee for one or more private or public enterprises. A person may be underage and have special conditions around collection of data. Classification and Discussion of Topics The set of topics were initially adapted from the scope of the CSA BDWG charter, organized according to the classification in [1]. Security and Privacy concerns are classified in 4 categories: Infrastructure Security Data Privacy Data Management Integrity and Reactive Security In this section, we describe the topics in detail. Rather than a prescriptive document at this stage, this text reproduces community discussion. Later versions will refine and organize as needed. Infrastructure Security Review of technologies and frameworks that have been primarily developed for performance, scalability and availability; e.g., Apache Hadoop, MPP databases, etc. High-availability Security against Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks. Data Privacy Impact of social data revolution on security and privacy of big data implementations. [discussion] Unknowns of Innovation - When a perpetrator, abuser or stalker misuses technology to target and harm a victim, there are various criminal and civil charges that might be applied to ensure accountability and promote victim safety. There are a number of U.S. federal and state/territory/tribal laws that might apply. To support the safety and privacy of victims, it is important to take technology-facilitated abuse and stalking seriously. This includes assessing all ways that technology is being misused to perpetrate harm, and, considering all charges that could or should be applied. Identify laws that address violence and abuse. Identify where they explicitly or implicitly include the use of technology and electronic communications: Stalking and cyberstalking (felony menacing by, via electronic surveillance, etc.)
0.5 - Multiple RA views for discussion (open the Figure as an object) - Appendices A and C - Additions to Executive Summary - New: Management Lifecycle M0243v2, M0247v1, M0249v1 Input from Gary Mazzaferro Orit
Appendix A: Index of Terms A analytics, 7 B Big Data, 5, 6 Big Data engineering, 5 Big Data paradigm, 4 Big Data velocity application, 14 Big Data volume system, 14 C complexity, 10 Computational portability, 6 D data lifecycle, 6 data sampling, 8 data science, 8 data science paradigm, 6 data scientist, 7 data warehouse, 14 F federated database system, 5 fourth paradigm, 6 M massively parallel processing, 4 metadata, 10 N non-relational models, 5NoSQL, 5 O ontologies, 10 P provenance, 13 R relational model, 10 S Schema-on-read, 6 semantic data, 10 semi-structured data, 10 streaming data, 12 structured data, 10 T taxonomies, 10 U unstructured data, 10 V validity, 8 value, 8 variability, 4 variety, 4 velocity, 10 veracity, 8 volatility, 8 volume, 4
ET-Strategies Lisa Martinez Consultant Gary Mazzaferro AlloyCloud, Inc. William Miller MaCT USA Sanjay Mishra Verizon Bob Natale Mitre Rod Peterson U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Ann Racuya-Robbins World Knowledge Bank Russell Reinsch Calibrum John Rogers HP Arnab Roy Fujitsu Mark Underwood Krypton Brothers LLC William Vorhies Predictive Modeling LLC Tim Zimmerman Consultant Alicia Zuniga-Alvarado Consultant The editors for this document were Nancy Grady and Wo Chang. Table of Contents
Data Provider → Application Provider End-point input validation Need to secure the sensor (e.g., camera) to prevent spoofing/stolen sensor streams. There are new transceivers and protocols in the DOD pipeline. Sensor streams will include smartphone and tablet sources. Real-time security monitoring Onboard and control station secondary sensor security monitoring. Data discovery and classification Varies from media-specific encoding to sophisticated situation-awareness enhancing fusion schemes. Secure data aggregation Fusion challenges range from simple to complex. Video streams may be used unsecured or unaggregated. Application Provider → Data Consumer Privacy-preserving data analytics Geospatial constraints: cannot surveil beyond Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM). Military secrecy: target and point of origin privacy. Compliance with regulations Numerous. There are also standards issues. Government access to data and freedom of expression concerns For example, the Google lawsuit over Street View. Data Provider ↔ Framework Provider Data-centric security such as identity/policy-based encryption Policy-based encryption, often dictated by legacy channel capacity/type. Policy management for access control Transformations tend to be made within DOD/contractor-devised system schemes. Computing on the encrypted data: homomorphic encryption Sometimes performed within vendor-supplied architectures, or by image-processing parallel architectures. Audits CSO and Inspector General (IG) audits. Framework Provider Securing data storage and transaction logs The usual, plus data center security levels are tightly managed (e.g., field vs. battalion vs. headquarters). Key management CSO—chain of command. Security best practices for data stores Not handled differently at present; this is changing in DOD. Security against DoS attacks DOD anti-jamming e-measures. Data provenance Must track to sensor point in time configuration and metadata. Fabric Analytics for security intelligence DOD develops specific field of battle security software intelligence—event driven and monitoring—that is often remote. Event detection For example, target identification in a video stream, infer height of target from shadow. Fuse data from satellite infrared with separate sensor stream. Forensics Used for after action review (AAR)—desirable to have full playback of sensor streams.
Executive Summary This NIST Big Data Interoperability Framework Volume 2: Taxonomies was prepared by the Definitions and Taxonomy Subgroup to facilitate better communication and understanding across the participants in this field by expanding on the functional components of the reference architecture. The top-level roles of the taxonomy are Data Provider, System Orchestrator, Data Consumer, Big Data Application Provider, Big Data Framework Provider, Security and Privacy, and Management. The activities within each of these roles are specified to see where the functional components reside. This taxonomy is not meant to be an exhaustive list; instead, it describes what is new in Big Data systems. In some cases this requires also listing current practices and technologies in the same category. The NIST Big Data Interoperability Framework consists of seven volumes, each of which addresses a specific key topic, resulting from the work of the NBD-PWG. In addition to this volume, the other volumes are as follows: Volume 1, Definitions Volume 3, Use Cases and General Requirements Volume 4, Security and Privacy Requirements Volume 5, Architectures White Paper Survey Volume 6, Reference Architectures Volume 7, Technology Roadmap The authors emphasize that the information in these volumes represents a work in progress and will evolve as time goes on and additional perspectives are available.