zilongwang/ReadingBank huggingface dataset:
Contact Lens Information Contact Lens Services: In order for contact lens services to be provided, we request the patient please wear his/her contact lenses into the office. Services and prescription cannot be provided without proper evaluation. If you have run out of your contact lenses it would be helpful if you could bring in the information from your current contact lenses: Brand of contacts, base curve, and prescription. (bring an empty box, the information is on the box) New Contact Lens Fit: ($125.00) Determination of up-to-date prescription, evaluation of what lens fits patient lifestyle, making sure each lens fits the anatomy of the eye correctly, teaching the patient how to insert and remove the contact lenses, teaching the patient proper care including cleaning, disinfection, and storage of the contact lenses, review of proper wearing schedule, and a follow-up visit to assure fit and vision are appropriate. Contact Lens Refit: ($75.00) Determination of best correction, re-evaluation of proper lens to match lifestyle, determination of new parameters to achieve best corrected vision and proper fit, review of best methods for contact lens care and proper wear and a follow-up visit to assure fit and vision are appropriate. Contact Lens evaluation: ($50.00) Determination of acuity, evaluation if a change in prescription is needed, evaluation of lens fit, determination if fit parameters need changing, and review of proper contact lens care and proper wear. Fees may be more for certain specialty types of lenses.
Delegated Authority Report Bonds: Official Action Approvals Official Action Projects without Volume Cap Request Podium Developer LLC (Boston) – $30,000,000 Visiting Nurse Communities, Inc. (Somerville) – $4,316,000 Ellis Memorial & Eldredge House, Inc. (Boston) – $3,940,000 Official Action Projects with Volume Cap Request Wayne at Schuyler, LLC (Boston) – $15,880,417 Lyman Terrace Phase I, LLC (Holyoke) – $15,825,747 Nuestras Casas Limited Partnership (Worcester) – $4,000,000 Final Approvals Final Approval Projects without Volume Cap Request Trustees of the College of the Holy Cross (Worcester) – (OA/FA) – $55,000,000 The Trustees of Hampshire College (Amherst) – (Revised FA) – $15,000,000 CIL Realty of Massachusetts Incorporated (Various) – (Revised FA) – $14,000,000 Community Alternative Residential Environments, Inc. (Various) – $9,100,000 The Advent School Corporation (Boston) – $9,000,000 Final Approval Projects with Volume Cap Request Manning Apartments LLC (Cambridge) – $57,000,000 Madison Williams LLC (Boston) – $9,500,000 Bianco LLC (Medford) – $7,293,000 Low Income Housing Tax Credits (“LIHTC”) Bond Issuer Tax Code Findings Manning Apartments LLC – (Tab 20) – LIHTC Madison Williams LLC – (Tab 21) – LIHTC
Referring to the Learning Covenant and the revisions to it in the mid-term evaluation, comment on the changes and/or growth you have observed during the TFE placement. Summarize your evaluation of the student’s readiness for ministry: Please identify any further areas for learning and growth for this student during their final year in the program. Other comments: Signatures: Student ______________________________ Date ______________ Supervisor ____________________________ Date _____________ This document is intended only for use in Knox College’s Theological Field Education program and should not be used for any other purpose without written permission from the student.
Official Action Project with Volume Cap Request BH Chestnut Crossing, LLC (Springfield) – $8,736,000 Bonds: Final Approvals Final Approval Projects without Volume Cap Requests CareGroup, Inc. (Various) – (OA/FA) – $497,000,000 Northeastern University (Boston) – (OA/FA) – $68,000,000 Western New England University (Springfield) – $61,000,000 Brandeis University (Waltham) – (OA/FA) – $42,435,000 Stonehill College, Inc. (Easton) – (OA/FA) – $25,000,000 American Youth Hostels-Boston Hostel, Inc. (Boston) – (OA/FA) – $24,000,000 Jewish Community Centers of Greater Boston, Inc. (Newton) – $11,000,000 Willow Hill School, Inc. (Sudbury) – (OA/FA) – $3,400,000 Final Approval with Volume Cap Request CJBW LLC (Greenfield) – $1,900,000 STANDING BOARD COMMITTEES Origination & Credit Committee – Chair: J. Blake Report of May 8, 2018 Meeting Minutes of April 10, 2018 Committee Meeting Lending Monthly Delegated Authority Report for Loan Approvals Lionano Inc. (Woburn) – Approval of Emerging Technology Fund II Loan
Bonds: Official Action Approvals Official Action Projects with Volume Cap Request 250 Centre Street Housing LLC (Boston) – $27,120,000 RiverMills Assisted Living, LLC (Chicopee) – $19,500,000 South End 10, LLC (Boston) – $7,886,160 Bonds: Final Approvals Final Approvals for Lease Financings New England Life Flight, Inc. (Various) – $30,000,000 Final Approval Projects without Volume Cap Request Partners HealthCare System, Inc. (Various) – (OA/FA) – $1,495,000,000 NewBridge on the Charles, Inc. (Dedham) – $260,605,000 Wheaton College (Norton) – (OA/FA) – $70,000,000 Boston Medical Center Corporation (Boston) – (OA/FA) – $50,000,000 Evergreen Center, Inc. (Various) – (OA/FA) – $16,370,000 Behavioral Health Network, Inc. (Springfield) – $7,480,000 Boston Collegiate Charter School Foundation, Inc. (Boston) – (OA/FA) – $7,200,000 STANDING BOARD COMMITTEES Audit & Administration Committee – Chair: P. McGovern Report of November 9, 2017 Meeting Minutes of May 31, 201 Compensation Committee – Chair: P. McGovern Report of November 9, 2017 Meeting
EXHIBIT LIST UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION , Plaintiff, □ Government, □ v. , Defendant. □ Case No.: 8:xx-cr-xxxx-T-33xxx □ Evidentiary □ Trial □ Other Exhibit Number Date Identified Date Admitted Sponsoring Witness Objections / Stipulated Admissions Description of Exhibit EXHIBIT LIST – Continuation Sheet Exhibit Number Date Identified Date Admitted Sponsoring Witness Objections / Stipulated Admissions Description of Exhibit
Other Duties Chair, Department Personnel Committee College Personnel Committee Internship Supervision Retention & Recruitment Committee First Year Experience Peer Mentor Student Recreation Society Advisor Graduate Student Committee Chair & Member Department Library Representative Department Curriculum Committee Department Appeals Committee University Writing in the Disciplines Committee Graduate Research and Teaching Assistant 08/01 – 05/05 University of Illinois, Department of Recreation, Sport & Tourism, Champaign-Urbana, Illinois Courses Taught RST 255 – Ethical Issues in Sport Management RST 130 – Foundations of Sport Management Courses Assisted RST 410 – Administration of Leisure Services RST 110 – Foundations for Delivery of Leisure Services Writing in the Disciplines Graduate Assistant 08/97 – 05/98 Western Illinois University, Macomb, IL. PUBLICATIONS Texts and DVDs Yoder, D.G., Dilworth, V.A. & Lukkarinen, M.D. (2011). Flow: Achieving excellence through challenge. [DVD] Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Peer-Reviewed Articles Lukkarinen, M.D. (2013). Interscholastic Sport Teams as a Nexus for a Sense of Community in Rural Settings. International Journal of Sport and Society, 4(4), 1-5. Lukkarinen, M.D. & Piper, T.J. (2013). Running a Successful Senior Olympics. International Journal of Sport and Society, 3(4), 85-90. Lukkarinen, M.D., Schodroski, E.J., & Piper, T.J. (2014). Senior Olympics Games: Benefits for an Older Population. Manuscript submitted for publication. Peer-Reviewed Published Abstracts Lukkarinen, M.D. (2013). Interscholastic Sport Teams as a Nexus for a Sense of Community in Rural Settings. In 2013 International Conference on Sport and Society Program Proceedings. Lukkarinen, M.D. & Piper, T.J. (2012). Running a Successful Senior Olympics. In 2012 International Conference on and Society Program Proceedings.
Furosemide Gabapentin Gemfibrozil Glimepiride Glipizide Glipizide ER Glipizide-Metformin Glyburide Glyburide Micronized Glyburide-Metformin Hydralazine Hydralazine-Hydrochlorothiazide Hydrochlorothiazide Ibuprofen Indapamide Indomethacin Irbesartan Irbesartan-Hydrochlorothiazide Isosorbide Dinitrate Isosorbide Dinitrate Sublingual Isosorbide Mononitrate Isradipine Ketoprofen Labetalol Lansoprazole Latanoprost Ophthalmic Levetiracetam Levobunolol Ophthalmic Levothyroxine Liothyronine Liotrix (Thyrolar) Lisinopril Lisinopril-Hydrochlorothiazide Loratadine Losartan Losartan-Hydrochlorothiazide Lovastatin Medroxyprogesterone Meloxicam Metaproterenol Metformin Metformin ER Methazolamide Methimazole Methocarbamol Methyclothiazide Methyldopa Methyldopa-Hydrochlorothiazide Metipranolol Ophthalmic Metolazone Metoprolol Succinate Metoprolol Tartrate Metoprolol-Hydrochlorothiazide Mexiletine Minoxidil Moexipril Moexipril‐Hydrochlorothiazide Montelukast Multivitamins Nabumetone Nadolol Nadolol-Bendroflumethiazide Naproxen Niacin Niaspan Nicardipine Nifedipine Nifedipine ER Nitroglycerin Nitroglycerin Patch Transdermal Olmesartan Olmesartan-Hydrochlorothiazide
MDM will allocate space on its homepage and all internal article and blog pages on mdm.com to highlight one or more articles that come out of this research project for three months. This space may also include content links for other Acme Software research. The space will be marked as Sponsored Content and will include the Acme Software in partnership with MDM. The content highlighted here may link to either an internal MDM page highlighting the survey results and other content generated from the survey or may link back to Acme Software’s page or both. This content may be created by MDM, by Acme Software or a combination of the two. 4. Co-Branded Whitepaper MDM will write, design and produce a PDF whitepaper with both quantitative and qualitative highlights from the survey. If Acme Software chooses, MDM will host the whitepaper on mdm.com with the goal of lead generation for Acme Software for up to six months. The whitepaper will also be delivered in PDF format for use by Acme Software in whatever capacity Acme Software wants to use it for sales and marketing purposes. The content in the PDF whitepaper can be repurposed in any way Acme Software chooses. MDM will deliver leads from the whitepaper every two weeks for the first month, and monthly after that for a maximum of six months. 5. Press Release MDM will produce a press release highlighting the survey results, linking to them on mdm.com and, if preferred, to Acme Software’s website. Acme Software can produce a press release or releases if it chooses and distribute it via Acme Software channels. 6. Analytics MDM will provide ongoing tracking and analysis of all components hosted on MDM platforms, including banner ads, emails, articles linked on the mdm.com and webcast views and deliver the results on a monthly basis to Acme Software. 7. Expert Speaker (in-person appearance) In-person appearance by one MDM researcher as industry expert at one Acme Location to be determined; travel expenses will be covered by Acme Software. Copyright and Sponsorship (see details & timeline below) 1. Sponsorship Terms
PLACEMENT The placement is a specific type of learning away from the University that is not work-based learning or a year abroad. N/A TOTAL STUDY HOURS 200 Assessment tasks Details of assessment for this module 90 minute unseen exam and a 2 000 to 3000-word assignment. The pass mark is 50% for each component and students will have to pass both to pass the module. Types of assessment task Indicative list of summative assessment tasks which lead to the award of credit or which are required for progression. % weighting (or indicate if component is pass/fail) WRITTEN 90 minute written examination 50% COURSEWORK 2-3,000 word written assignment 50% PRACTICAL Formative presentations during the module teaching week N/A EXAMINATION INFORMATION Area examination board Refer to Faculty Office for guidance in completing the following sections External examiners Name Position and institution Date appointed Date tenure ends Dr Nicholas Gall MSc MD FRCP Consultant Cardiologist(Arrhythmias and Neurocardiology)Honorary Senior Lecturer, KCL February 2014 February 2018 QUALITY ASSURANCE Date of first approval Only complete where this is not the first version Date of last revision Only complete where this is not the first version Date of approval for this version Version number Modules replaced Specify of modules for which this is a replacement MDM04 Invasive Cardiology & Cardiac Surgery
MODULE SPECIFICATION TEMPLATE MODULE DETAILS Module title Health Protection Module code MDM33 Credit value 20 credits Level Mark the box to the right of the appropriate level with an ‘X’ Level 4 Level 5 6 Level 7 X Level 8 Level 0 (for modules at foundation level) Entry criteria for registration on this module Pre-requisites Specify in terms of module codes or equivalent Students must be registered on a higher degree programme (M level or higher) or be employed in an area where knowledge of health protection is a requirement for achieving their day-to-day activities/research. Normal entry requirement for the Graduate Programme will apply Co-requisite modules Specify in terms of module codes or equivalent Module delivery Mode of delivery Taught X Distance Placement Online Other Pattern of delivery Weekly Block X Other When module is delivered Semester 1 Semester 2 X Throughout year Other Brief description of module content and/ or aims Overview (max 80 words) The module will cover the basic principles of infection control and environmental hazards in the UK. There will be an emphasis on prevention and enable practitioners to understand and explore their role and contribution within infection control and/or control of environmental hazards. Module team/ author/ coordinator(s) Dr Louise Sigrid, University of Oxford (Module Lead) Rachel Cloke, Public Health England Dr Paudyal, BSMS Prof Jackie Cassel School Division of Medical Education, BSMS Site/ campus where delivered Falmer Course(s) for which module is appropriate and status on that course Course Status (mandatory/ compulsory/ optional) MSc Public Health Optional MSc Leadership & Commissioning Optional
4.3 Permutations With Some Identical Items Permutations With Some Identical Items When dealing with permutations of items that include identical items of one type, identical items of another type, and so on, you can use the formula Example 1 Permutations With Some Identical Elements Compare the different permutations for the words DOLE, DOLL, and LOLL. Solution For DOLE are 24 permutations of the four letters in DOLE. For DOLL Only 12 are actually different order, thus the number of different arrangement is 12. For LOLL Thus, the number of permutations is 4. You can generalize the argument in Example 1 to show that the number of permutations of a set of items of which are identical is . Example 2 Tile Patterns Tanisha is laying out for the edge of a mosaic. How many patterns can she make if she uses four yellow tiles and one each of blue, green, red, and grey tiles? Solution and Tanisha can make 1680 different patterns with the eight tiles. Example 3 Permutation With Several Sets of Identical Elements The word is unusual in that it has three consecutive double letters. How many permutations are there of the letters in ? Solution There are 151 200 permutations of the letters in . The number of permutations of a set of objects containing identical objects of one kind, identical objects of a second kind, identical objects of a third kind, and so on is Example 4 Applying the Formula for Several Sets of Identical Elements
Ursula can fill the for either roses or lilies in 19 059 ways. Homework Practice: Pg279 #1-9 11-13 15 20 22 1. Evaluate using a variety of methods. Explain why you chose each method. 2. Evaluate the following of combinations and compare their values. 3. Communication In how many ways could you choose 2 red jellybeans from a package of15 red jellybeans? Explain your reasoning. 4. How many ways can 4 be chosen from a deck of 52, if the order in which they are chosen does not matter? 5. How many groups of 3 toys can a child choose to take on a vacation from a toy box containing 11 toys? 6. How many sets of 6 questions for a test can be chosen from a list of 22 questions? 7. In how many ways can a teacher select 5 students from a class of 23 to make a bulletin-board display? Explain your reasoning. 8. As a promotion, a video store decides to give away posters for recently released movies. a) If posters are available for 27 recent releases, in how many ways could the video-store owner choose 8 different posters for the promotion? b) Are you able to calculate the number of ways mentally? Why or why not? 9. Communication A club has 11 members. a) How many different 2-member committees could the club form? b) How many different 3-member committees could the club form?
U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida GOVERNMENT’S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: Case Style: v. Date Identified: Date Admitted: U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida GOVERNMENT’S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: Case Style: v. Date Identified: Date Admitted: U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida GOVERNMENT’S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: Case Style: v. Date Identified: Date Admitted: U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida GOVERNMENT’S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: Case v. Date Identified: Date Admitted: U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida GOVERNMENT’S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: Case v. Date Identified: Date Admitted: U.S. District Middle District of Florida GOVERNMENT’S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: Case Style: v. Date Identified: Date Admitted: U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida GOVERNMENT’S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: Case Style: v. Date Identified: Date Admitted: U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida GOVERNMENT’S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: Case Style: v. Date Identified: Date Admitted: U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida GOVERNMENT’S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: Case Style: v. Date Identified: Date Admitted:
Financial Status and Sustainability Sr # Parameter Required Actual / Observed 1 Working Capital Minimum Rupees 10 million (For private Institution) Common Facilities Shared within Institute Parameter Capacity Actual / Observed Area per Person Min. Area Actual / Observed Auditorium (1) 300 capacity 10 sqft/person 1000 sqft Lecturer Hall (1) 100 capacity 10 sqft/person 1000 sqft Library (1) 300 capacity 10 sqft/person 2000 sqft Cafeteria (1) 100 capacity 20 sqft/person 2000 sqft Examination Hall (1) 300 capacity 10 sqft/person 1000 sqft Internet / Computer Labs (1) 50 Capacity 10 sqft/person 500 sqft Administrative Staff – Essential S.# Categories of staff Required Qualification and responsibility Actual / Observed 1 Program director 1 Faculty member (Professor/ Associate Professor/ Assistant Professor) 2 Librarian 1 Graduate in library science and computer literate. B.Sc. 3 Administrative officer /Computer technician/operator/typist 1 - Diploma in computer - Fluent in language
4 Veterinary Officer 1 Bachelor in Veterinary Medicine 5 Biostatistician 1 - M.Sc Biostatistics - Minimum two years experience 6 Lab Attendant 2 F.Sc in biological Sciences with 2 year experience 7 Animal house attendant 2 Matric 8 Peon 2 Matric 9 Security guards 1 Matric 10 Cleaners 1 Teaching Faculty/Staff Designation Available Deficiency Name No. with PMDC Experience (Institution Name) in last 3 years Professor MBBS with FCPS, MS, or equivalent Associate Professor MBBS with FCPS, MS, or equivalent Assistant Professor MBBS with FCPS MS, or equivalent Publication
PART (III) Infrastructure Bed Strength Infrastructure Minimum required Available Remarks Beds 16 Male 8 Female 8 Hemodialysis Unit Minimum required Available Remarks Beds 6 EQUIPMENT Equipment Minimum Required Available Remarks H.D machines 6 Water Treatment System 1 Resucitation trolley with defibrillator 1 USG machine 1 optional Nebulizers 1 Glocometer 1 Oxygen
U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida PLAINTIFF’S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: Case Style: v. Date Identified: Date Admitted: U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida PLAINTIFF’S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: Case v. Date Identified: Date Admitted: U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida PLAINTIFF’S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: Case Style: v. Date Identified: Date Admitted: U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida PLAINTIFF’S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: Case Style: v. Date Identified: Date Admitted: U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida PLAINTIFF’S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: Case v. Date Identified: Date Admitted: U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida PLAINTIFF’S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: Case Style: v. Date Identified: Date Admitted: U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida PLAINTIFF’S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: Case v. Date Identified: Date Admitted: U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida PLAINTIFF’S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: Case Style: v. Date Identified: Date Admitted: U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida PLAINTIFF’S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: Case Style: v. Date Identified: Date Admitted:
A. Will the Proposer meet requirements as stated in the referenced section of the RFP? (1) Proposer Response: Check One Yes, as stated No, will not meet at all __________________________________________________ (2) Proposer Response: If “Yes” then Check One: Meeting these requirements requires no additional development Meeting these requirements requires minimal additional development Meeting these requirements requires significant additional development B. No Response Required [No Proposer response required for Part B of this section. Proposer’s should delete this text.] 6.2 General Electrical Requirements A. Will the Proposer meet requirements as stated in the referenced section of the RFP? (1) Proposer Response: Check One Yes, as stated No, will not meet at all __________________________________________________ (2) Proposer Response: If “Yes” then Check One: Meeting these requirements requires no additional development Meeting these requirements requires minimal additional development Meeting these requirements requires significant additional development B. No Response Required [No Proposer response required for Part B of this section. Proposer’s should delete this text.] 6.3 General Communications Requirements A. Will the Proposer meet requirements as stated in the referenced section of the RFP? (1) Proposer Response: Check One Yes, as stated No, will not meet at all __________________________________________________ (2) Proposer Response: If “Yes” then Check One: Meeting these requirements requires no additional development Meeting requirements requires minimal additional development Meeting these requirements requires significant additional development
ACRNs Browsing ACRNs The ACO and CA user can browse ACRNs. ACRNs may be present for a contract modification or delivery order. To specify ACRN information for EDA-only contract modifications, see the topic . To browse a list of ACRNs, do the following: Locate the MOD whose ACRNs you wish to browse. See the topic or to locate a MOD. On the Manage MOD Page or Manage Delivery Order Page, click the Browse ACRNs link (Figure 44). Figure 44: Browse ACRNs link The Browse ACRNs Page appears. If you are viewing ACRNs for a delivery order, no ACRNs will be displayed. If one or more are associated with a contract modification or delivery order, the Browse ACRNs page displays a list of the ACRNs (Figure 45). Figure 45: Browse ACRNs Page with ACRNs To view an ACRN, on the Browse Page, click the link in the ACRN column for the ACRN you wish to view. The appears. See the topic for further information. To edit an ACRN, on the Browse ACRNs Page, click the edit icon for the ACRN you wish to edit. The appears. See the topic for further information. To view the MOD, on the Browse ACRNs Page, click the Contract Number link (Figure 46). The or appears. Figure 46: Contract Number link Viewing an ACRN The ACO and CA user roles can view ACRNs. To view an ACRN, do the following: Locate the MOD ACRNs you wish to view. See the topic or to locate a MOD; see the topic to locate an ACRN. On the Browse Page, click the link in the ACRN column for the ACRN you wish to view (Figure 47).
1721804 4A5A 2570001900501202D000000A00000912744050120 Step 1 – Identify which of the four major patterns matches your funding LOA. You identify pattern #2 - Navy Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) (Figure 57). Figure 57: LOA Pattern 2 Step 2 – Add three spaces after the Department code (17) (Figure 58). Figure 58: LOA with spaces after Department Code Step 3 – Verify that the Department code is in positions 1 and 2 and that the Treasury Account number is in positions 7 through 10. Scenario Three: You receive a funding document with the following LOA: 97-11X8242 2808 000 74 082 0 065916 2D PFRT44 930680020GUR Step 1 – Identify which of the four major LOA patterns matches your funding LOA. You identify pattern #3 - Navy Foreign Military Sales (FMS) (Figure 59). Figure 59: LOA Pattern 3 Step 2 – The FMS indicator “11” must be in positions 3 and 4. Therefore, delete the dash "-" in position 3. a space in front of the “X” in position 6 (Figure 60). Figure 60: LOA with dash removed, FMS indicator repositioned, added Step 3 – Verify that the Department code is in positions 1 and 2 and that the Treasury Account number is in positions 7 through 10. When the LOA has a Foreign Military (FM) fund indication as shown in Pattern #3, positions 4 and 5 contain 11; you must also locate the three-digit mandatory Sub Account number located in positions 17 through 19. Follow the steps listed. The FMS indicator "11" must be in positions and four for the Treasury Symbol to pass FPDS validation. Scenario Four: You receive a funding document with the following LOA: Step 1 – Identify which of the 4 major LOA patterns matches your funding LOA. You identify pattern #4 - Army GFEBS (Figure 61).
U.S. District Middle District of Florida DEFENDANT’S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: v. Date Identified: Date Admitted: U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida DEFENDANT’S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: v. Date Identified: Date Admitted: U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida DEFENDANT’S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: v. Date Identified: Date Admitted: U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida DEFENDANT’S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: v. Date Identified: Date Admitted: U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida DEFENDANT’S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: v. Date Identified: Date Admitted: U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida DEFENDANT’S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: v. Date Identified: Date Admitted: U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida DEFENDANT’S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: v. Date Identified: Date Admitted: U.S. District Middle District of Florida DEFENDANT’S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: v. Date Identified: Date Admitted: U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida DEFENDANT’S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: v. Date Identified: Date Admitted:
Classification and Life Cycle Standards Organisations and development procedures Voluntary, Consensus-Based Standards National and International Quality Infrastructure Module 2 Conformity assessment Overview of conformity assessment System Certification Product certification Multilateral/Mutual Recognition Arrangements and Agreements (MLAs/MRAs) Legal Impacts Module 3 Economic impacts of standardisation Economic Impact-macro perspective Standards and sustainable trade Economic Impact-micro perspective Benefits of standards Cost impacts of standards Technological Innovation using standards Module 5 Project management The Nature of Projects and Project Management Project Lifecycles and Phases Initiating and Defining the Project Identifying Work, Responsibilities and Roles Project Time Management Project costs and financials Module 6 Business strategy and standardisation Strategy Formulation Trade agreements information management Strategic choice Implementation, monitoring and control of a chosen strategy How much does it cost? R36,000 This amount includes provision of all learning materials and catering for the workshop. Assessments: Assignments and Portfolio When can you apply and register? The application and registration process for the MDPSO takes place from 1 June until 15 July 2017. Attendance at the MDPSO study school is compulsory and the dates thereof will be provided. Where can you find more information and contact us? You may contact the colleagues below for application, registration and academic queries. Dumisani Kewuti Tel: 011 652 0263 Email: Letsai Mashishi Tel: 011 652 0217 Email: Programme Leader Prof Roy Ramphal Tel: 011 652 0363 Email: ramphrr@unisa.ac.za
Section of Change Recommendation Evidence Quality/ Strength of Expected Impact Operational Educational Financial Shock - Diagnosis We recommend that assessment for shock begin with a targeted clinical history and physical exam, including acquisition of vital signs. include some of the high risk clinical features for sepsis (high-risk features of invasive infection such as malignancy, bone marrow or solid organ transplant, asplenia, presence of an indwelling central line/catheter, or any other situation with immune deficiency, compromise, or suppression) Low/Strong Educational – Pearl Add the high risk features as a pearl in the beginning of the Pediatric Shock Protocol (after the introductory paragraph and before the “see page 39 “red 21”) The should read “High-risk features for invasive infection include malignancy, bone marrow or solid organ transplant, asplenia, presence of indwelling central line/catheter, or other situation with immune deficiency, compromise or suppression”. Also – add in the normal Pediatric VS to the “Pediatric Specific Equipment Size” bit We recommend that EMS providers and system leaders implement decision support tools to assist in the early identification and treatment of shock in pediatrics Low/Strong Place pearl in the protocols (will be based on high-risk clinical criteria – such as presence of as well as age specific VS abnormalities “Pediatric shock is well established before the appearance of classic signs and symptoms. The earliest signs and symptoms of pediatric shock include delayed capillary refill, alterations in mental status, rising pulse, and increasing respiratory rate. By the time blood pressure drops, circulatory collapse is
U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: v. Date Identified: Date Admitted: U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: v. Date Identified: Date Admitted: U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: v. Date Identified: Date Admitted: U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: v. Date Identified: Date Admitted: U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: v. Date Identified: Date Admitted: U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: v. Date Identified: Date Admitted: U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: v. Date Identified: Date Admitted: U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: v. Date Identified: Date Admitted: U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: Case Number: v. Date Identified: Date Admitted:
MDP US Equity Search 2017 Q&A Please note that an amended RFP was posted a week after the original, eliminating a minimum for assets under management. Given that Illinois SURS has a different AUM definition for Emerging Managers (vs states like California), may a pro-forma portfolio based on the criteria within the RFP be submitted for consideration, in addition to our funded composite which is based on firms AUM under $2 Billion. Yes Section V.3. Question 5. Please explain the reference to required “experience in providing passive management”. We are exclusively an active manager. This is a mistake in the RFP. It should read active instead of passive. The Minimum Qualifications in Appendix A do not include the first two of the list of Minimum Qualifications on page 4 of the package (Section III: Scope, Qualifications and Information Requested). Should we amend Appendix A and respond to those two items for the submission or use Appendix A as it stands? The dates on the two forms also do not match; in the Appendix the notice date is 12/31/16 and on page 4 it is 3/31/17 – please clarify. Please use Appendix A as it stands. The two additional minimum qualifications concerning conflicts of interest and most favored nation clauses should be added to the Letter of Transmittal. An amended RFP has been posted to our website that revises the date to 6/30/17. You ask for a minimum firm asset level of $50 million. Is there a product minimum? If not, are you willing to be the lead institutional investor in a strategy? In the amended RFP posted to our website, the minimum asset level has been removed. Yes, we are willing to be the lead institutional investor in a strategy. We are an asset manager based in California and have not applied for the Illinois certification. We do meet the requirements as defined by the Illinois Business Enterprise for Minorities, Females, and Persons with Disabilities Act. Can we still apply if we show proof of minority ownership?
Exception: Pavement Recommendations NEW HMA Segment # Highway # From RP To RP Design Type New HMA Mainline Pavement Thickness (inches) Mix Design/ Material Spec. Compaction Testing Width (ft.) Wear Non-Wear Smoothness Notes Mainline Subsurface Thickness (inches) Material Spec. Compaction Testing Width (ft.) Base Subbase Eng. Soil Subgrade Prep. Notes HMA Shoulders Thickness (inches) Lifts Mix Design/ Material Spec. Compaction Testing Width (ft.) Lt Rt HMA Aggregate Surfacing Shoulder Agg. Base
Existing PCC Existing Aggregate Notes Mainline Pavement Depth (inches) Lifts Material Spec. Width (ft.) Mill HMA Rubblize/ Crack & Seat Subsurface Drains Notes Mainline Pavement Thickness (inches) Mix Design/ Material Spec. Compaction Testing Width (ft.) Wear Non-Wear Smoothness Notes HMA Shoulders Thickness (inches) Lifts Mix Design/ Material Spec. Compaction Testing Width (ft.) Lt Rt HMA Aggregate Surfacing Shoulder Agg. Base Notes Aggregate Shoulders Thickness Material Spec. Compaction Testing Width Lt Rt Aggregate Surfacing Added Aggregate Base Notes
Aggregate Shoulders Thickness Material Spec. Compaction Testing Width Lt Rt Aggregate Surfacing Aggregate Base Notes Misc. Pavement Recommendations and Instructions to Designers NEW PCC Segment # Highway # From RP To RP Design Type New PCC Mainline Pavement Thickness (inches) Spacing (ft.) Dowel Arrangement Dowel Size Sealant Width (ft.) PCC Mainline Subsurface Thickness (inches) Lifts Material Spec. Compaction Testing Width (ft.) Base Subbase Eng. Soil Subgrade Prep. Subsurface Drains Notes
Misc. Pavement Recommendations and Instructions to Designers Whitetopping Segment # Highway # From RP To RP Design Type Whitetopping Mainline Pavement (inches) Lifts Material Spec. Width (ft.) Mill HMA Mainline Pavement Thickness (inches) Joint Spacing (ft.) Dowel Arrangement Dowel Size Sealant (ft.) PCC Overlay Notes HMA Shoulders Thickness (inches) Mix Design/ Material Spec. Compaction Testing (ft) Lt Rt HMA Aggregate Surfacing Shoulder Agg. Base Notes Aggregate Shoulders Thickness Material Spec. Compaction Testing Width Lt Rt Aggregate Surfacing Added Aggregate Base
Mainline Pavement Thickness (inches) Joint Spacing (ft.) Dowel Arrangement Dowel Size Sealant Width (ft.) PCC Overlay Notes Mainline Subsurface Thickness (inches) Lifts Material Spec. Compaction Testing Width (ft.) Interlayer Subsurface Drains Notes HMA Shoulders Thickness (inches) Mix Design/ Material Spec. Compaction Testing Width (ft) Lt Rt HMA Aggregate Surfacing Shoulder Agg. Base Aggregate Shoulders Thickness Material Spec. Compaction Testing Width Lt Rt Aggregate Surfacing Added Aggregate Base PCC Shoulders Thickness Material Spec. Compaction Testing Width Lt Rt PCC Aggregate Surfacing Shoulder Agg. Base Notes
Contents Page Introduction 3 Preparatory Paperwork Calling, Character, Competence and Context 4 Mission Action Planning 10 Pastoral Epistles 14 The Ordinal 19 360 degree review 23 Agreed Record 25 Ministry Development Plan 27 INTRODUCTION MDR is an ongoing process which enables those who hold the Bishop’s license to To reflect before God on our vocation and ministry
Agreed Record EXAMPLE Name Reviewer Date of Review Initial Context / Challenge Identified What changes or developments do I want to see? What needs to be done to bring about these changes? What should be different in 12-18 months Priority One Church Warden about to retire, lack of lay leaders in the parish More confident lay leadership, and someone to act as Church Warden Build relationships confidence Identify potential Change my approach Build culture of appreciation and gratitude More volunteers More confident people Culture of member ministry Priority Two Feeling overwhelmed by work, poor health, spiritually up A better work/life balance, renewed joy in prayer and worship Help to address issues Time set to solve problems New skills / people to talk Congregation and family notice the difference in me, I feel renewed in ministry and ready for the next five years. Priority Three A big building project on the horizon and a complex team to lead I want more confidence in leadership and project management Acquire new skills Know what is involved in building project Identify allies in parish Building project underway and everyone confident in management, not too many distractions Agreed Record Form Name Reviewer Date of Review
? Ask congregation how they feel A better work/life balance, renewed joy in prayer and worship Help to address issues Time set to solve problems New skills / people to talk Course in Time Management or Clergy Wellbeing Pastoral Reflection Group, Cell Group, Spiritual Director Diary management Retreat and holiday Take up a hobby Make time to sport / walking Congregation and family notice the difference in me, I feel renewed in ministry and ready for the next five years. I want more confidence in leadership and project management Acquire new skills Know what is involved in building project Identify allies in parish Internet research or find lay person with project management skills Mentor or Work consultant, consult diocese and DAC Build team, establish time line, include time to plan/do/reflect Ask for feedback Building project underway and everyone confident in management, not too many distractions Please note that only resources identified in this learning plan will be eligible for CDM funding, and many resources may be available through the diocese. If you would like a conversation about your learning plan, please contact the Department of Discipleship and Ministry. Ministry Development Plan Name Date of Review Consultant Date of Plan Changes and Developments I want to see (carried over from Agreed Record) Changes that need to happen (Carried over from Agreed Record) Formal Education 10% Learning with Others 20% Learning through Experience 70% What should be different in 12-18 months (Carried over from Agreed Record)
Availability: December 2015 Size and Binding Softbound Item Number MDFR16 ISBN # 978-1-60151-886-6 Price $ 95.95 Delivery Method Publication Understanding Modifiers Understanding Modifiers uses actual medical records to outline in detail how to document services and apply the correct modifiers. The book was developed as an educational tool for physicians and their staff, as well as billers and coders of hospital outpatient services and ASC services. Key Features and Benefits Optum360 Edge—Includes all AMA CPT® Modifier Updates. Optum360 Edge—Educational format. Easy-to-use format for every experience level, for use in the classroom or on the job. Optum360 Edge—World Wide Web resources. Supplies all of the up-to-date links a coder needs to find accurate modifier information online. Optum360 Edge—Decision tree flow charts. Coders learn how to choose the correct modifier when more than one could apply. Optum360 Edge—Real-life clinical examples. Use to reduce claim denials by supplying correctly used modifiers and completed CMS-1500 forms. Includes 2016 changes to modifiers and their guidelines. CPT® is a registered trademark of the American Medical Association.
Organizational Chart Governor of Mississippi State Board of Directors Executive Director Mississippi Department Rehabilitation Services Of fi ce of Support Services Of fi ce of Special Disability Programs Of fi ce of Disability Determination Services Of fi ce of Vocational Rehabilitation Services Of fi ce of Vocational Rehabilitation Services for the Blind Statewide Independent Living Council (SILC) Spinal Cord Injury/ Traumatic Brain Injury Advisory Council State Rehabilitation Council
Areas of particular experience, skill or gifting that could be shared more widely. Any other comment? Signed: Minister I have informed my Area Bishop’s office of all personal contact details, including phone numbers, email addresses and social media profiles and relevant updates. I (or an appropriate person/s in my parish(es) have ensured that our information is up to date on the Diocesan ‘My Diocese’ Database and achurchnearyou.com Reviewer Date: Please: send this completed form to your Reviewer not less than two weeks before the review and keep a copy for your own records. After the review meeting This summary, once agreed with your Reviewer, should be sent to the MDR Administrator, Jane Instone at Saint Mary’s House. Copies will be sent to; the Area Bishop, along with any note of disagreement if you and your reviewer cannot agree.
posted at the eScholarship Repository, University of California. http://repositories.cdlib.org/uclastat/papers/2003010112 Torgerson, Warren S. (1958), Theory and Method of Scaling, New York: Wile
Hand Book for Students MDS COURSE REGULATIONS (subject to modification from time to time) 2013-14 INDEX Page No’s MDS Course 1. General OBJECTIVES 5 2. ELIGIBILITY Criteria 5 3. Selection of postgraduate students 6 4. Period of Training 6 5. Medium of instruction 6 6. General Information 7 7. Staffing pattern for postgraduate 7 degree programme 8. University Examination 9 9. Scheme of Examination 10 10. Examiners 11 11. Valuation of Answer Books 11 12. Syllabus distribution among 4 papers in various 11 specialties 13. Criteria for declaring as Pass 13 14. Nomenclature of specialties for MDS degree 13 15. Definitions of Various Specialties 14 16. and Objectives of the Curriculum 15 17. Teaching and learning activities 16 18. AND REGULATIONS FOR THE POST GRADUATE 18 STUDENTS 19. Check listS (1-8) 19 ETHICS IN DENTISTRY 26
Table: 9 Diagnostic and Operative Procedures Performed Name: Admission Year: Date Name OP No Procedure Category O, A, PA, PI Key: O – Observed initial 6 months of admission A – Assisted a more senior faculty – I MDS PA – Performed procedure under the direct supervision of a senior faculty – II MDS PI – Performed Iindependently – III MDS
For MDSAP only: Which countries are you currently or planning to ship medical devices into? (i.e., What are the Applicable Jurisdictions and corresponding Medical Device Regulations?) Australia: Therapeutic (Medical Devices) Regulations 2002 Schedule 3, Part 1 - Full Quality Assurance System Schedule 3, Part 4 - Quality Assurance System of Production Brazil: Federal Law n. 6360/76 RDC ANVISA n. 16/2013 - Good Manufacturing Practices RDC ANVISA n. 23/2012 RDC ANVISA n. 67/2009 - Vigilance RDC ANVISA n. 56/2001 - Essential Requirements for Safety and Effectiveness Canada: Medical Device Regulations SOR/98-282, Part 1 United States: 21 CFR Part 803 - Medical Device Reporting 21 CFR Part 806 - Reports of Corrections and Removals 21 CFR Part 807 (Subparts A to D) - Establishment Registration and Device Listing 21 CFR Part 820 - Quality System Regulation 21 CFR Part 821 - Device Tracking Japan: PMD Act (J-QMS ordinance) MHLW MO169 For MDSAP only Is there an existing GMP certificate issued by ANVISA in Brazil? yes no For MDSAP only Should TÜV SÜD conduct the MDSAP audit concurrently with other regulatory audits such as the European MDD? yes no If applicable, what regulatory / industry standards are relevant to your company?
The program expects 80% of its teacher candidates to score at the Proficient level on the STAR. It expects 100% of its candidates to have no scores of “needs improvement” on the APD rubric. 2013 Assessment Data 2014 Assessment Data Program MDLG MDLG MDLG MDLG Semester Spring 2013 Fall 2013 Spring 2014 Fall 2014 Count 26 14 11 4 STAR 2012 (US): K1b Sets Expectations for Learning and Achievement 96.1% 100% 100% 100% STAR 2012 (US): E1d Establishes and Maintains a Positive Climate 100% 100% 100% 100% STAR 2012 (US): C1a Assumes the Professional Role and Maintains High Ethical Standards 96.2% 100% 100% 100% Count 25 14 16 4 APD: D1 Impact 100% 100% 100% 100% APD: D2 Professional Identity & Growth 100% 100% 100% 100% APD: D3 Leadership 100% 100% 100% 100% APD: D4 Advocacy 100% 100% 100% 100% APD: D5 Collaboration 100% 100% 100% 100% APD: D6 Ethics 100% 100% 100% 100% Plans for 2014: Based upon the 2013 assessment data included in this annual report, what changes/improvements will the program implement during the next academic year to improve performance on this student learning outcome? All performance outcomes were met; no changes are needed at this time. Student Learning Outcome 5 (knowledge, skill or ability to be assessed) SLO 5: Initial teacher licensure candidates demonstrate a positive impact on student learning by assessing/analyzing student learning, adjusting instruction, monitoring progress, and reflecting on the effects of their instruction.
WORKAROUND: Manually modify the task sequence, selecting the option to migrate local accounts, and specify a password to be used with the local account. For details, see . Known Issues for ZTI Deployments Only The following is a list of known issues that relate to ZTI deployments only. Installing Chinese Windows 7 prompts for user input When deploying Windows 7 with Chinese language, the installation process stops waiting for user input. This is caused by an error in the Lang.ini file in Windows 7. WORKAROUND: Update the Lang.ini file as show below. Original Lang.ini file: [Available UI Languages] zh-CN = 3 [Fallback Languages] zh-CN = en-us Lang.ini file after modification: zh-CN = 2 en-us = 3 [Fallback Languages] zh-CN = en-us Restore User State step is skipped during replace scenario In a Replace Computer deployment scenario, the Restore User State task sequence step is skipped if the OSDStateStorePath property is set to a valid local or Universal Naming Convention path. WORKAROUND: Set the USMTLocal property to TRUE. Doing so forces ZTI UserState.wsf to recognize the path in the OSDStateStorePath property. This is caused by the Request State Store task sequence step being skipped and the previous value in the OSDStateStorePath property being retained. The task sequence may fail with separate System or Active partitions Windows will not assign a drive letter to the System or Active partition if that drive is different from the drive on which the operating system is located. If the largest partition is also the System or Active partition, the task sequence may fail to resume in the new operating system.