American Indian: 0% Multi-Racial: 29% - students English Language Learners (ELL) not making satisfactory progress in Reading Barrier(s): Strategy(s): 1. 0% All ELL students made growth in 2012 as measured by CELLA 0% Students with Disabilities (SWD) not making satisfactory progress in Reading Barrier(s): Strategy(s): 1. 53% - 26 students 50% Economically Disadvantaged Students not making satisfactory progress in Reading Barrier(s): Strategy(s): 1. 24% - 14 students 22% Reading Professional Development PD Content/Topic/Focus Target Dates/Schedule Strategy(s) for follow-up/monitoring Common Core training focusing on Close Reading Oct/Nov Lesson Plans, Classroom Data, Peer Observations Common Core and Informational Text and Quality Questioning Oct/Nov Lesson Plans, Classroom Data, Observations Make It Real- Strategies for Success with Informational Text - book study On-going 2012-13 Lesson Plans, Classroom Data, Observations, Agendas CELLA GOAL Anticipated Barrier Strategy 2012 Current Percent of Students Proficient in Listening/ Speaking: Teachers with ESOL endorsement All teachers assigned with ELL students will take one class until endorsed or coverage Assistant Principal Classroom Teachers 2012 Current Percent of Students Proficient in Reading: Teachers with ESOL endorsement All teachers assigned with ELL students will take one class until endorsed or Assistant Principal Classroom Teachers
coverage 2012 Current Percent of Students Proficient in Writing: Teachers with ESOL endorsement All teachers assigned with ELL students will take one class until endorsed or coverage Assistant Principal Classroom Teachers Mathematics Goal(s): 1. 2012 Current Level of Performance (Enter percentage information and the number of students that percentage reflects) 2013 Expected Level of Performance (Enter percentage information and the number of students that percentage reflects) Anticipated Barrier(s): 1. Strategy(s): 1. FCAT 2.0 Students scoring at Achievement Level 3 Barrier(s): Strategy(s): 1. 83% = 355 students 90% Florida Alternate Assessment: Students scoring at levels 4, 5, and 6 in Mathematics Barrier(s): Strategy(s): 1. N/A FCAT 2.0 Students scoring at or above Achievement Levels 4 and 5 in Mathematics Barrier(s): Strategy(s): 1. 54% = 229 students 58% Florida Alternate Assessment: Students scoring at or above Level 7 in Mathematics Barrier(s): Strategy(s): 1. N/A Florida Alternate Assessment: Percentage of students making learning Gains in Mathematics Barrier(s): Strategy(s): 1. N/A FCAT 2.0 Percentage of students in lowest 25% making learning gains in Mathematics Barrier(s): Strategy(s): 1. 62% = 54 students 64% Florida Alternate Assessment: Percentage of students in Lowest 25% making learning gains in Mathematics Barrier(s): N/A
Writing 2012 Current Level of Performance (Enter percentage information and the number of students that percentage reflects) 2013 Expected Level of Performance (Enter percentage information and the number of students that percentage reflects) Barrier(s): Strategy(s): 1. FCAT: Students scoring at Achievement level 3.0 and higher in writing 94% = 114 students 96 Florida Alternate Assessment: Students scoring at 4 or higher in writing N/A Science Goal(s) (Elementary and Middle) 1. 2012 Current Level of Performance (Enter percentage information and the number of students that percentage reflects) 2013 Expected Level of Performance (Enter percentage information and the number of students that percentage reflects) Barrier(s): Strategy(s): 1. Students scoring at Achievement level 3 in Science: 77% 81% Florida Alternate Assessment: Students scoring at levels 4, 5, and 6 in Science N/A Students scoring at or above Achievement Levels 4 and 5 in Science: 18% = 2 students 20% Florida Alternate Assessment: Students scoring at or above Level 7 in Reading N/A Science Goal(s) 2012 Current Level 2013 Expected
(High School) 1. of Performance (Enter percentage information and the number of students that percentage reflects) Level of Performance (Enter percentage information and the number of students that percentage reflects) Barrier(s): Strategy(s): 1. Florida Alternate Assessment: Students scoring at levels 4, 5, and 6 in Science Florida Alternate Assessment: Students scoring at or above Level 7 in Science Student subgroups by ethnicity (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, American Indian) not making satisfactory progress in Algebra. White: Black: Hispanic: Asian: American Indian: English Language Learners (ELL) not making satisfactory progress in Algebra Students with Disabilities (SWD) not making satisfactory progress in Algebra Economically Disadvantaged Students not making satisfactory progress in Algebra APPENDIX B (SECONDARY SCHOOLS ONLY) Algebra 1 EOC Goal 2012 Current Level of Performance (Enter percentage information and the number of students that percentage reflects) 2013 Expected Level of Performance (Enter percentage information and the number of students that percentage reflects) Barrier(s): Strategy(s): 1.
Hispanic: English Language Learners (ELL) not making satisfactory progress in Geometry Students with Disabilities (SWD) not making satisfactory progress in Geometry Economically Disadvantaged Students not making satisfactory progress in Geometry Biology EOC Goal 2012 Current Level of Performance (Enter percentage information and the number of students that percentage reflects) 2013 Expected Level of Performance (Enter percentage information and the number of students that percentage reflects) Students scoring at Achievement level 3 in Biology: Students scoring at or above Achievement Levels 4 and 5 in Biology: Civics EOC 2012 Current Level of Performance (Enter percentage information and the number of students that percentage reflects) 2013 Expected Level of Performance (Enter percentage information and the number of students that percentage reflects) Students scoring at Achievement level 3 in Civics: Students scoring at or above Achievement Levels 4 and 5 in Civics: U.S. History EOC 2012 Current Level of Performance (Enter percentage information and the 2013 Expected Level of Performance (Enter percentage information
number of students that percentage reflects) and the number of students that percentage reflects) Students scoring at Achievement level 3 in U. S. History: Students scoring at or above Achievement Levels 4 and 5 in U. S. History: Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Goal(s) Anticipated Barrier Strategy Based on the analysis of school data, identify and define areas in need of improvement: Goal 1: Goal 2: Career and Technical Education (CTE) Goal(s) Anticipated Barrier Strategy Person/Process/Monitoring Based on the analysis of school data, identify and define areas in need of improvement: Goal 1: Goal 2: Additional Goal(s) Anticipated Barrier Strategy Person/Process/Monitoring Based on the analysis of school data, identify and define areas in need of improvement: Goal 1: Goal 2: