--- language: - en tags: - Compiler - LLVM - Intermediate Representation - IR - Path - Hot Path configs: - config_name: default data_files: - split: train path: data/train-* - split: validation path: data/validation-* - split: test path: data/test-* dataset_info: features: - name: path dtype: string - name: count dtype: int64 - name: source_file dtype: string - name: label dtype: int64 splits: - name: train num_bytes: 3468576 num_examples: 1190 - name: validation num_bytes: 647074 num_examples: 211 - name: test num_bytes: 194998 num_examples: 160 download_size: 798471 dataset_size: 4310648 --- # Dataset Card for Compiler Hot Paths ## Dataset Description This dataset consists of 1561 compiler paths generated from 26 C programs in the [Polybench Benchmark Suite](https://github.com/MatthiasJReisinger/PolyBenchC-4.2.1) using the [Ball-Larus Algorithm](https://github.com/waker-he/ball-larus/tree/main). Each path, a sequence of LLVM IR instructions, is has three associated values: 1. `count`, an integer indicating the number of times this path is executed in the original program. 2. `source_file`, a string indicating which program was this path from. 3. `label`, an integer of 0 or 1 indicating whether this path is "cold" or "hot" respectively. Note: 4 programs (`deriche`, `cholesky`, `gramschmidt`, `correlation`) were excluded because we encountered errors when running them. ## Uses This dataset was used to train/fine-tune machine learning models to perform hot path predictions: Given a path, predict whether it is "hot" or "cold". A path is considered "hot" if it is executed more than a threshold of *n* times, where we defined *n = 1*, otherwise it is considered "cold". ## Dataset Structure The dataset is split into train (1190, 75%), validation (211, 15%), and test (160, 10%) sets. The test set consists of paths from 4 programs (in PolyBench), namely, `jacobi-2d`, `syr2k`, `durbin`, `2mm`. These 4 programs were randomly selected to be the test set before generating the paths. This guarantees that the models have never seen the test set's programs. The train and validation sets consist of the remaining 22 programs, which were randomly split after generating the paths (while maintaining the hot-to-cold-paths ratio), meaning that some paths in the validation set and training set may come from the same C program. However, this likely won't be an issue since the paths themselves are distinct.