自由軟體運動
Free software movement

context: zh_tw: 這個運動的理念在於電腦的使用不應該阻礙人際合作。更直接地說，這個運動代表著拒絕專有軟體並推廣自由軟體。它的終極目標在於解放網路世界中的每個人 —— 即每個電腦使用者。理查・斯托曼表明這個行動旨在提升而非妨礙科技的進步，因為「這代表我們可以避免重複無益的系統程式設計，而把這份精力用在推動技術革新上面。」("It means that much wasteful duplication of system programming effort will be avoided. This effort can go instead into advancing the state of the art.")
en: The philosophy of the movement is that the use of computers should not lead to people being prevented from cooperating with each other.  In practice, this means rejecting "proprietary software", which imposes such restrictions, and promoting free software, with the ultimate goal of liberating everyone in cyberspace – that is, every computer user. Stallman notes that this action will promote rather than hinder the progression of technology, since "it means that much wasteful duplication of system programming effort will be avoided. This effort can go instead into advancing the state of the art".Members of the free software movement believe that all users of software should have the freedoms listed in The Free Software Definition. Many of them hold that it is immoral to prohibit or prevent people from exercising these freedoms and that these freedoms are required to create a decent society where software users can help each other, and to have control over their computers.Some free software users and programmers do not believe that proprietary software is strictly immoral, citing an increased profitability in the business models available for proprietary software or technical features and convenience as their reasons."While social change may occur as an unintended by-product of technological change, advocates of new technologies often have promoted them as instruments of positive social change." This quote by San Jose State professor Joel West explains much of the philosophy, or the reason that the free source movement is alive. If it is assumed that social change is not only affected, but in some points of view, directed by the advancement of technology, is it ethical to hold these technologies from certain people? If not to make a direct change, this movement is in place to raise awareness about the effects that take place because of the physical things around us. A computer, for instance, allows us so many more freedoms than we have without a computer, but should these technological mediums be implied freedoms, or selective privileges? The debate over the morality of both sides to the free software movement is a difficult topic to compromise respective opposition.The Free Software Foundation also believes all software needs free documentation, in particular because conscientious programmers should be able to update manuals to reflect modification that they made to the software, but deems the freedom to modify less important for other types of written works. Within the free software movement, the FLOSS Manuals foundation specialises on the goal of providing such documentation. Members of the free software movement advocate that works which serve a practical purpose should also be free.
qas: question: zh_tw: 這個運動的主要目標是什麼？
en: What was the main goal of the movement?
answers: zh_tw: text: 解放網路世界中的每個人 —— 即每個電腦使用者
en: text: liberating everyone in cyberspace