範妮・伊姆利
Fanny Imlay

context: zh_tw: 雖然戈德溫十分喜愛他的女兒們，但他在很多方面都沒有為照顧她們作好準備。如同託德解釋的那樣，他的工作需要安靜的環境，但女兒們的喧鬧聲卻常常讓他煩惱生氣。然而，當他前往都柏林去拜訪沃斯通克拉夫特的妹妹時，他卻對女兒們無比思念，並經常寫信給她們。1801 年 12 月 21 日，在範妮 7 歲時，戈德溫與鄰居瑪麗・簡・克萊爾蒙特結婚，她帶來了她的兩個孩子：三歲大的克萊爾與六歲大的查爾斯（Charles）。她在此前從未結過婚，並同戈德溫一樣在尋求穩定的經濟來源。雖然克萊爾蒙特接受過良好的教育並遊歷豐富，但戈德溫的許多朋友都十分厭惡她，認為她庸俗且不誠實。他們驚訝於克萊爾蒙特居然能取代瑪麗・沃斯通克拉夫特當年的位置。範妮與她的同母異父妹妹瑪麗都不喜歡她們的繼母，並抱怨她喜歡自己的子女多過她們。1803 年 3 月 28 日，戈德溫與克萊爾蒙特婦生下了一個兒子威廉（William）。雖然戈德溫十分讚賞沃斯通克拉夫特的文筆，但他並不同意她的女性應與男性接受相同教育的觀點。因此，他有時會給範妮與瑪麗閱讀薩拉・特里默的《神話史》（1786 年）和安娜・拉埃蒂茨婭・巴鮑德的《兒童啟蒙教程》（1778－1779 年）。不過，據託德的描述，戈德溫並沒有在其女兒的教育上下多大工夫，並且漠視了沃斯通克拉夫特為範妮寫的書。然而，在威廉・聖克萊爾（William St Clair）寫的戈德溫與雪萊家族的傳記中，他提到戈德溫與沃斯通克拉夫特曾在子女的教育上進行過廣泛深入的探討；後來，這些討論反映在了戈德溫的《問詢者》一書裡。他還舉證說，在沃斯通克拉夫特死後，戈德溫給她以前的一位學生芒卡謝爾（Mountcashell）小姐寫了一封信，請教她應如何撫養和教育他的兩個女兒。在米蘭達・西摩（Miranda Seymour）寫的瑪麗・雪萊的傳記裡，她對聖克萊爾的觀點也表示認同，提到：“就我們所知的其女兒（指瑪麗，但顯然也適用於範妮）早年的每一件事，都傳達著她是按其母親贊成的方式接受教育的這一觀點”，並還指出，她有著一位擔任家庭教師會說法語的繼母，以及一位根據自己教育子女的經歷寫作童書的父親。戈德溫家女兒們的教育主要由新的戈德溫太太負責，但她卻偏愛給自己的女兒傳授更多的知識，其中包括法語。在繼父再婚後，範妮便沒有再接受過正規的教育。不過，戈德溫的一位早期傳記作者基根・保羅（C. Kegan Paul）用以下的這些優點來描述成年後的範妮：“有教養、精神充沛、聰明、優秀的信件作者、出色的家務管理者”。範妮擅長於繪畫，並接受過音樂教育。雖然戈德溫個人信仰無神論，但他還是讓孩子們去教堂禮拜。
en: On 21 December 1801, when Fanny was seven, Godwin married Mary Jane Clairmont, a neighbour with two children of her own: three-year-old Claire and six-year-old Charles. She had never been married and was looking, like Godwin, for financial stability. Although Clairmont was well-educated and well-travelled, most of Godwin's friends despised her, finding her vulgar and dishonest. They were astonished that Godwin could replace Mary Wollstonecraft with her.  Fanny and her half-sister Mary disliked their stepmother and complained that she preferred her own children to them. On 28 March 1803, baby William was born to the couple.Although Godwin admired Wollstonecraft's writings, he did not agree with her that women should receive the same education as men. Therefore, he occasionally read to Fanny and Mary from Sarah Trimmer's Fabulous Histories (1786) and Anna Laetitia Barbauld's Lessons for Children (1778–79), but, according to Todd, he did not take great pains with their educations and disregarded the books Wollstonecraft had written for Fanny.  William St Clair, in his biography of the Godwins and the Shelleys, argues that Godwin and Wollstonecraft spoke extensively about the education they wanted for their children and that Godwin's writings in The Enquirer reflect these discussions. He contends that after Wollstonecraft's death Godwin wrote to a former pupil to whom she had been close, now Lady Mountcashell, asking her advice on how to raise and educate his daughters. In her biography of Mary Shelley, Miranda Seymour agrees with St Clair, arguing that "everything we know about his daughter's [Mary's and presumably Fanny's] early years suggests that she was being taught in a way of which her mother would have approved", pointing out that she had a governess, a tutor, a French-speaking stepmother, and a father who wrote children's books whose drafts he read to his own first. It was the new Mrs Godwin who was primarily responsible for the education given to the girls, but she taught her own daughter more, including French. Fanny received no formal education after her stepfather's marriage. Yet, the adult Imlay is described by C. Kegan Paul, one of Godwin's earliest biographers, as "well educated, sprightly, clever, a good letter-writer, and an excellent domestic manager". Fanny excelled in drawing and was taught music. Despite Godwin's atheism, all of the children were taken to an Anglican church.
qas: question: zh_tw: 戈德溫朋友怎樣看待克萊爾蒙特？
en: How do Godwin's friends view Clairmont?
answers: zh_tw: text: 庸俗且不誠實
en: text: vulgar and dishonest