What is Dr. Watson's first name? | Reference.com What is Dr. Watson's first name? A: Quick Answer Dr. Watson's first name is John. His full name is John H. Watson. The H stands for Hamish. Dr. Watson's name is only mentioned four times in the original works by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. Full Answer Usually, the name is listed as a credit to Dr. Watson for his contributions to the story rather than in the story itself. Dr. Watson himself does mention his own name, however, in "The Problem of Thor Bridge." While his wife, Mary, calls him James in certain texts, it is believed that she may be referring to his middle name, Hamish, which is a variation of James. Dr. Robert A. Watson, MD - Abington, PA - Cardiology & Interventional Cardiology & Critical Care Medicine & Internal Medicine | Healthgrades.com Dr. Robert A. Watson, MD Cardiology 1235 Old York Rd Ste 222 Abington, PA 19001 Dr. Watson specializes in Cardiology and practices in Abington, PA. He practices at 1 location. Are you Dr.

Watson? Add your own statement here . See how Dr. Watson's experience matches your preferences. 2 Specialties For the best healthcare for your needs, choose a doctor who specializes in your medical condition. 3 Board Certifications Board certification indicates that a doctor is highly qualified in the medical field in which they practice. 51 Check to see that this provider treats your medical condition. 20 Check to see that this provider performs the procedure that you need. Background Check Check to see if your provider has any malpractices, board actions, or sanctions. Education Learn more about where this provider went to medical school, residency, and more. Awards & Recognition View information about special awards and recognition for this provider. Languages Spoken Check to see what languages this provider and/or staff speak. Memberships & Professional Affiliations View memberships and affiliations associated with this provider. Overall Patient Satisfaction Likelihood of recommending Dr. Watson to family and friends is 5 out of 5 Have you seen Dr. Watson? See His Affiliated Hospitals Hospital Quality 1200 Old York RdAbington, PA 19001 Hospital Awards See our Cardiology Specialists at Aria Health View Hospital Profile Likelihood of recommending Dr.

Watson to family and friends 5 based on 17 total surveys (8 with reviews) Leave a review Level of trust in provider's decisions (17) How well provider explains medical condition(s) (17) How well provider listens and answers questions (17) Spends appropriate amount of time with patients (17) Ease of scheduling urgent appointments (17) Office environment, cleanliness, comfort, etc. (17) Total wait time (waiting & exam rooms) Under 10 minutes (15) 55 -Robert E. Romanelli PhD in Huntingdon Valley, PA | Nov 24, 2016 Dr. Watson is an excellent diagnostician and dedicated to quality care and highest professional medical services. This is the office you want to make your appointment with if you want to feel safe and secure in your future health concerns and your treatment options. 55 -JOHN BARTON in WYNCOTE, PA | Aug 04, 2016 Dr. Watson is the most professional, knowledgeable, TO THE POINT Doctor one could ask for especially dealing with the heart. I was sent to the ER at Abington Hospital with some minor pain-DR.

Watson explained to me what test I needed to receive ASAP and what he though my concerns/problems were. I returned 2 weeks later after the test--he greeted me with confidence and explained how the procedure would be performed. All went GREAT. Left the next day. Thanks you again Dr. Watson- you are the BEST! 55 -harvey rosen in Wyncote, PA | Jul 07, 2016 Kept my husband alive and functional for many years. 55 -Maria Sirolli in Glenside Pa | Jun 24, 2016 Doctor Watson is an exceptional Cardiologist. He is a compassionate doctor who has a calming demeanor and makes his patients feel secure. He takes as much time as needed with his patients and answers all questions and concerns. You never feel rushed with Dr. Watson and his bedside manner is exceptional. He remembers who you are and makes you feel important . This is a trait that is missing in many healthcare practices. I would highly recommend him to anyone needing cardiac care. 55 -William D Markert Jr. in Philadelphia, PA | Jun 21, 2016 I believe Dr.

Watson has kept me alive for the past 14 years. From my first procedure, he has has always been there to support me and my family, answer questions and provide advice. He is professional, friendly and very knowledgeable. I would recommend him to anyone who has cardic issues. 55 -Bruce D in Warminster, PA | Jun 18, 2016 Stop looking around. Just get an appt. with the best team around. 55 -Linda Flynn in Philadelphia, PA | Apr 27, 2016 Dr. Watson is wonderful! 55 -Christopher in Philadelphia, PA | Jan 21, 2016 I see a lot of Doctors and Dr. Watson by far is the most professional I see. He actually listens to you and answers all your questions. I never feel hurried through the appointment. I wish all my Doctors would act like Dr. Watson. Dr.

Watson's experience matches your search based on the following criteria: Based on total number of patients treated over the last 12 months Specializes in Cardiology Board certified in Cardiovascular Disease, Internal Medicine and Interventional Cardiology Malpractice claims in Pennsylvania not available No sanctions found Healthgrades Recognized Doctor designation identifies leading doctors who: Are board certified. Have not had their license surrendered or revoked since Healthgrades started collecting data in 2000. Have no malpractice judgments, adverse arbitration awards, or monetary settlements for the last five years in the states in which Healthgrades can collect malpractice data. Are free of state or federal disciplinary actions (sanctions) for the last five years. Healthgrades updates the Recognized Doctor list quarterly based on board certification data. Healthgrades also receives sanction and malpractice data throughout the year, depending on how frequently the state medical boards release updates. We remove a newly sanctioned doctor from the Recognized Doctor list as soon as we receive the information. However, it is important to note that malpractice information is publically available in only 14 states. Media & Publications Dr. Watson has no media or publications listed. Background Check What is medical malpractice What is medical malpractice?

Medical malpractice is issued when negligence by a doctor causes injury to a patient. For example, a doctor may improperly diagnose, treat or medicate outside the standard of medical care. The three types of malpractice are: a settlement, an arbitration award, or a judgment. If my doctor has malpractice history, does that mean he or she is a poor-quality doctor? If your doctor has a malpractice claim, evaluate the information and determine if the action could potentially impact the quality of care you receive. Claim settlements and arbitration awards may occur for a variety of reasons, which should not necessarily reflect negatively on the doctor's professional competence or conduct. You may want to use this information to start a discussion with the doctor about his or her history and specific ability to provide healthcare for you. How far back does Healthgrades malpractice history go? Healthgrades reports details of a doctor’s malpractice history when the doctor has at least one closed medical malpractice claim within the last five years, even if he or she no longer practices in that state. For which states does Healthgrades collect malpractice history?

Healthgrades collects malpractice information from California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, and West Virginia. If your doctor has a malpractice claim, evaluate the information and determine if the action could potentially impact your quality of care. Sometimes multiple states report the same claim. If a provider practices in a state where data is unavailable, please reach out to your local state legislature to help make this data publicly available. 0 What is a sanction or disciplinary action What is a sanction or disciplinary action? A sanction, also known as a disciplinary action, is an action taken to punish or restrict a doctor who has demonstrated professional misconduct. Sanctions may be imposed by a state medical board, professional medical licensing organization, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. If my doctor has sanction history, does that mean he or she is a poor-quality doctor? If a doctor has a sanction, it does not necessarily mean that he or she is a poor-quality doctor. Some sanctions are not related to medical care, and involve a doctor’s finances or administrative activities.

Before you make any choices about changing your doctor, we recommend that you evaluate the doctor’s sanction information and determine how severe or relevant you think the sanction cause and action were. How far back does Healthgrades sanction history go? Healthgrades reports state and federal sanctions from the previous five years, except when a doctor's license has been revoked or surrendered. Healthgrades displays all actions for doctors whose licenses have been revoked or surrendered. For which states does Healthgrades collect sanction history? Healthgrades collects sanction history from all 50 U.S. states. Physicians with a disciplinary action in one state may move to another state where they have a clean record. Since Healthgrades painstakingly compiles disciplinary action information from all 50 states, Healthgrades website will show if a physician has a disciplinary action in more than one state. 0 What are board actions What are board actions? Board actions are non-disciplinary actions imposed upon a doctor based on a complaint investigation. A patient or medical colleague may file a complaint with that state medical board or professional licensing organization, which then investigates the complaint. Board actions are intended to ensure that a doctor is able to perform safe medical and health care tasks.

Types of non-disciplinary actions include an advisory letter, a corrective action agreement, a limitation or restriction on the medical or healthcare tasks a doctor can perform, or a voluntary agreement by the doctor not to practice. A board action can also include a termination of a corrective action agreement or voluntary agreement, which allows the doctor to return to full practice. If my doctor has a board action, does that mean he or she is a poor-quality doctor? If a doctor has a board action, it means he or she has had a non-disciplinary action imposed upon him or her. It does not necessarily mean that he or she is a poor quality doctor. Before you make any choices about changing your doctor, evaluate the doctor's board action information and determine how severe or relevant you think the cause and action were. How far back does Healthgrades non-disciplinary board action history go? Healthgrades reports non-disciplinary board action history from for the previous five years, except when a doctor's license has been revoked or surrendered. Healthgrades displays all actions for doctors whose licenses have been revoked or surrendered. For which states does Healthgrades collect non-disciplinary board actions? Healthgrades collects non-disciplinary board actions from all 50 U.S. states.

Background Check Why It Matters: Dr. Watson's Board Certifications Board certification should be one of your top considerations when choosing a doctor. Board certification is an official recognition given to doctors who have met specific requirements set by national medical specialty boards in the... More Why It Matters: Dr. Watson's Board Certifications Board certification should be one of your top considerations when choosing a doctor. Board certification is an official recognition given to doctors who have met specific requirements set by national medical specialty boards in the United States. Board certification indicates that a doctor is highly qualified in the medical field in which he or she practices. A board-certified doctor is more likely than a non-board-certified doctor to have the most current skills and knowledge about how to treat your medical condition. Dr. Watson is Board Certified in: Cardiovascular Disease Accrediting Board: American Board of Internal Medicine * Internal Medicine Watson's Wives (Presented at the annual Dayton ACD symposium, March 9, 2002) The ladies love Dr. Watson. He has that "shy but rugged" thing going for him.

He was war service and suffering in his past, yet he still stumbles over his words when left alone with a dainty young governness like Mary Morstan. He is a trusting, caring, and often unappreciated friend to Sherlock Holmes for at least three decades. He is very verbal, as is evidenced in his writings, and he has a keen eye for fashion, as also evidenced in his writings. The ladies have many reasons to love Dr. Watson, and Watson, like all men, has many reasons to love the ladies. And despite the occasional rumor to the contrary, he does love them, as he testifies in his report of "an experience of women which extends over many nations and three separate continents." Just how much he was "experiencing" this multinational group is anyones guess, but that statement alone shows that Watson at least appreciated them and remembered them. The ladies love Dr. Watson. Watson loves the ladies. So why dont the two get along? There are those naïve fans of Dr. Watson among us who will try to tell you that Watson got along fine with women. Theyll tell you that he was only married once, to Miss Mary Morstan, and that was it.

Another good monogamous role model for our children, and another satisfied customer at the trough of marital bliss. But as much as we wish happiness for the good doctor, the evidence points in an entirely different direction. In one tale, his fiancee is an orphan. In another tale, his wife is visiting her mother. One month, Watson is off living the married life, the next month, hes back living with Holmes on Baker Street, over and over again. Can you imagine what would happen if a celebrity like Watson tried to slip such things past todays gossip newspapers like The National Enquirer? Dr. Watsons picture would be plastered across the cover of every paper in the supermarket checkout lane. Once one begins to truly dig into Watsons role as a husband, one inevitably has to wonder, "Just how many times has this guy been married?" Not quite as proud of this aspect of his relationships with women as he was the number of continents hed been with them on, Dr. Watson kept the exact figure well hidden. A vague reference to a date here, the odd marital mention there . . . and the lack of names!

If you search the entire Canon, you will never find a mention of any wife by name in any story. Sure, he announces his engagement to Mary Morstan, but do we ever hear the name "Mary" again during any period in which he is married? Not at all. And Watson wasnt the only one covering up his love life. The doctors Literary Agent kept certain documents suppressed that not only reveal a previously unknown first wife for Watson, but also give us the key to the entire Watsonian matrimonial phenomenon. Those documents, recently brought to light by the Baker Street Irregulars, hint at Watsonian secrets that Sherlockians are only now beginning to explore. But before we proceed with our look at the wives of Watson, beginning with that newly revealed first wife, theres a small disclaimer I have to make. There are two components to any serious effort to track Watsons married life. The first component is the chronological study of the good doctors writings  a detailed analysis of when each of his tales of Sherlock Holmes actually took place. The second component of tracking Watsons wives is, quite obviously, the identification of those wives.

Many Sherlockian chronologists like to cheat a bit when it comes to these two components, and pretend they know the answer to part two before even approaching part one. Mary Morstan was Watsons only wife, they say, and then they use the idea of a single Watsonian marriage to figure out the sequence of the stories. But our friend Sherlock Holmes had a phrase to describe such faulty logic  he called it "theorizing before the facts." And you know what happens when you do that: Instead of forming theories to fit the facts, you inevitably start twisting facts to fit the theories. To determine the true story behind Watsons marriages, a researcher has to place dates on the stories without using Watsons marital comments. This isnt an easy process. In fact, its long, tedious, and would make a rather dull talk. It took me over a year to put that list of sixty dates together, the results of which could be seen on the Hounds of the Internet for sixty consecutive weeks in 2000 and 2001, so were going to skip that part today. Today were just going to concentrate on component two, the wives themselves.

By looking at the periods of married life and bachelorhood in Watsons life when the stories are objectively laid end-to-end one can not only find the true number of Watsons wives, but some clues to their identities as well. So . . . how many wives did Watson have, when all is said and done? Six. Yes, when William S. Baring-Gould once wrote that there were Sherlockians who seemed to want to give Watson as many wives as Henry the Eighth, he wasnt stretching the truth at all. Watson really had six wives. Dont believe me? Well, lets stroll down the aisle with Dr. Watson and see just who the six wives of Watson the first really were. Wife number one . . . As I mentioned earlier, Watsons first wife was a secret that the doctor and his Literary Agent kept from the reading public for well over a century. Why were both of them keeping the secret, you ask? Well, Conan Doyle actually went so far as to try writing the tale of Watsons courtship of his first wife as a play, a play called The Angels of Darkness.

As Doyles knowledge of America and its denizens was very limited at that time, most of the characters in that play were broad caricatures based on ethnic stereotypes. Its almost a cartoon, except when you come to Dr. Watson. Doyle knew Watson, and how he spoke, and one quickly sees that the Watson of The Angels of Darkness is one of the few real people in the play. The basic story of the play is the same one well come to know as the Mormon segment of A Study in Scarlet, with many differences, the most important of those being that Lucy Ferrier lives at the end. Not only does she live, but Jefferson Hope winds letting her go to the man she truly loves . . . and guess who that is: John Watson, M.D. At the plays end, a ceremony of sorts takes place. Lucy Ferrier is given Watsons hand and asked that he be hers and she be his until "death do you part." Lucy both promises to this, then swears to it, on top of that.

The ceremony is a joining of two people, and the only difference between it and what is considered a "proper" wedding ceremony is the fact that the questioning is conducted not by a minister or other religious figure, but by mountain man Jefferson Hope. Over the years Sherlockians have wondered just how it was that Dr. Watson could be married one minute and single the next, then married again, then single. Divorce laws of the day were not easy to deal with, and, as weve often seen in the Sherlock Holmes stories, married people tended to stay married even when theyd rather not be. But with the new revelation of this simple ceremony conducted by Jefferson Hope, we suddenly find just how it was that Watson got away with having one wife after another . . . he never officially married any of them. While it may not have been a common practice in upper class Victorian Britain, the casual bestowing of the title of "Mrs." to a live-in lover or even a prostitute who attached herself to one man was not unusual in Americas Wild West of that time, or even among the lower classes of London itself.

In "His Last Bow," Sherlock Holmes said that his vocabulary seemed to be "permanently defiled" by his years in America, but in Watsons case, more than his vocabulary was defiled . . . the doctors views of marriage seem to be defiled as well. Small personal ceremonies without any official status could set Watson up with one wife after another . . . and give him an exit route when things werent working out. As they eventually didnt work out with Lucy Ferrier Watson. The troubles in the Watson-Ferrier marriage probably started not long after they came to England. A change from the soil where the flower of love originally grew can affect the health of the blossom, to put it poetically. The difference between wild western America and structured London, England would put stresses on any marriage, and in Watsons case, those stresses seem to have damaged John and Lucys relationship to the point where Watson signed up as an army surgeon to try to put some distance between himself and his bride.

His return, sickly and wounded, actually wound up causing him to spend more time with her, however, until, at last, we find him standing in the Criterion Bar before lunchtime on a day when young Stamford is about to wander through. Didnt you ever wonder why a supposedly single man who had a hotel room all to himself would get up and head to a bar before noon, instead of lounging lazily around his room? He wouldnt . . . unless he was trying to get away from something or somebody. Like his wife. Further evidence can be found in the subject of Watsons thoughts while standing at the bar that morning, which were, in his own words, "that I must make a complete alteration in my style of living." A complete alteration of his style of living. Instead of living like a tourist in London, he must live like a resident.

Instead of living like a married man, he must live, as he later says he and Holmes do in "The Speckled Band," "sharing rooms as bachelors." Note that in "Speckled Band," Watson doesnt say he and Holmes were bachelors  he just says they were living as bachelors Perhaps John and Lucy had finally had a horrible fight the night before. Perhaps Lucy brought up her former lover Jefferson Hope, and the fact that she always liked him better than Watson. Whatever the case, Watsons troubles with Lucy are enough that when Stamford shows up at the Criterion Bar, the doctor decides then and there to make that "complete alteration" in his style of living. Would he have gone through with it, had Stamford not shown up with a convenient prospect for new lodgings? Well never know. The very next day Watson left wife number one and moved into 221B Baker Street. Wife number two . . . Dr. Watson met his second wife during late 1886. How do we know this? From Sherlock Holmess reaction in early 1887.

Watson was apparently one of those lovers whose annoying public displays of affection start to drive their friends crazy. Why else would Sherlock Holmes suddenly throw himself headlong into a European case on February 14, 1887, if not to get away from Watsons Valentines Day celebrations? The case is that of Baron Maupertuis and the Netherland-Sumatra Company, and Sherlock Holmes works madly at it for two solid months, fifteen hours a day, going so far as to work five days straight at one point. If that werent proof enough, when loverboy Watson finally tracks him down again, Holmes is overcome with "the blackest depression." Watson drags Holmes back to Baker Street, then decides a vacation would be good for him, at which point Sherlock Holmes has only one question: "Is the establishment a bachelor one?" Why would Holmes so desperately care about a "bachelor establishment" if not to pry Watson away from his newfound love? It is a short-lived relief for Holmes, but at least he gets some rest before Watson leaves Baker Street to move in with his new bride at the beginning of summer 1887.

By July, however, Holmes has resolved himself to Watsons new wife enough to spend the night at their house, and even acknowledges Watsons amorous ways enough to say, "I should consider myself a criminal if I kept you out of bed any longer." So who was this second Mrs. Watson, whom Dr. Watson met in late 1886, only to annoy Holmes with her in early 1887 and wed her before July of that year? Well, Watson is a writer, and writers do tend to refer their great loves somewhere in their work. And even though Watsons chronicles are somewhat devoid of female presences in the 1885 and 1886, a Sherlockian scholar named Richard W. Clarke came up with a great idea some years ago. Clarke thought that Watson may have substituted names of his lady friends for the names of ships that appeared in the Canon. Looking to the only case Watson recorded from autumn of 1886, "The Resident Patient," the answer appears. Watsons second wife was a hot one, both in the amorous nature that so irritated Holmes and the temper that finally drove Watson away.

Who else could she have been but "the ill-fated steamer Norah Creina"? But its not Sherlock Holmes who will make or break Watsons relationships. By September of 1887, this explosive Mrs. Watson is seeking solace at her mothers house and Watson is back in Baker Street. Why? Plainly, wife number three was coming into the picture. Wife number three . . . When Watsons marriage is showing signs of trouble in September of 1887, it is not so far a stretch to say another woman may have entered the picture in the summer of that year. And Watson did meet some pretty remarkable women that summer. The "intensely womanly" Lady Hilda Trelawney for one. "Intensely womanly?" That sounds like the sort of inoffensive statement one can get away with saying in front of ones bad-tempered wife, while admiring a fine female form. Watson is obviously checking out the ladies, but restraining his reactions so he doesnt have to sleep on the sidewalk. A little later in the same month, Watson is also checking out his friend Percy Phelpss fiancee, Annie Harrison.

Luckily for Percy, shes "a little short and thick for symmetry"  just not Watsons type. Who is Watsons type? Well, a little romantic profiling and a quick look at The Sign of Four will give the answer to that: Watson likes the dainty blondes, which brings us to the next of Watsons wives: Miss Morrison from "The Crooked Man." She is "a little ethereal slip of a girl" whom Sherlock Holmes finds "by no means wanting in shrewdness or common sense." Shes a virtual clone of Mary Morstan, a woman we know Watson will eventually fall in love with, and much more the good doctors type than Annie Harrison. Of course, Watson never really meets Miss Morrison at any time during the events he wrote up in "The Crooked Man." We must remember, however, that he did write up "The Crooked Man," and to do so, Watson surely had to do a little background research on those parts of the tale in which he was not involved. Interviewing Miss Morrison would not have been that far out of Watsons line.

Miss Morrison was not only Watsons type  she was also almost the exact polar opposite of the steamy Norah Creina. Holmes seems to like Morrison, just like he seemed to dislike Creina. Might he have even encouraged Watson to look up Miss Morrison when the case was done, in early September 1887? Could Sherlock Holmes have been that manipulative of his friend Watson? Any day of the week. By mid-September, the current Mrs. Watson is at her mothers. And by October of 1887, Watson is suddenly writing that its "a few weeks before my own marriage." At this point, we can pretty well predict that Watsons next informal wedding is going to involve the ethereal Miss Morrison. The third Mrs. Watson, however, was going to be quite the change of pace from her predecessor, who annoyed Holmes with public displays of affection and had him concerned about keeping Watson out of the marital bed.

Less than two months after his third wife moves in, we find Watson back in Baker Street once more, complaining that "a long series of sterile weeks lay behind us." When The Valley of Fear begins in January of 1888, one can safely assume that Holmes isnt the only one whos grumpy because he hasnt been using his "remarkable powers." The year 1887 had not been a good one for Dr. Watson. But he wasnt the only one. The year 1887 had also not been a good one for Flora Millar. Her career as a dancer at the Allegro was behind her. The support of Lord Robert St. Simon had come to an end as well, when he had decided to marry that American girl. And by the end of the year, Scotland Yard was after her for murder, which didnt do her reputation any good even after she was cleared of the charge. By the beginning of 1888, things were looking pretty desperate for Flora, and an offer came her way. It seemed that a mathematics professor, of both means and influence, was being spoken badly of by a private investigator whose fame was on the rise.

The reason for this investigators rise in popularity was his room-mate, a writer who had just published an account of one of the detectives early adventures in Beetons Christmas Annual. Like most writers, however, this one had a vice that could be exploited, and the mathematics professor saw a chance to rob the detective of his popularity and his voice. So it was that dear little Flora Millar came to Baker Street in late January to thank Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson for their help in clearing her name the previous autumn. Holmes, of course, cared little for her thanks, but Dr. Watson, at that point, was happy to bask in any female attentions he could get. Watson was so happy, in fact, that by March of 1888 we find him writing the words: "I had seen little of Holmes lately. My marriage had drifted us away from each other." And somewhere in the shadows, Professor Moriarty was very happy for Watson.

Said happiness would not last long, however, as by June, Holmes not only has Watson at his side against Moriarty once more, but brother Mycroft as well, one step behind the professor (who was using the pseudonym "Wilson Kemp" at the time). Having failed to keep Watson distracted, Flora is soon back on the danseuse unemployment line, leaving the doctor open for . . . Wife number five . . . In September of 1888, John H. Watson was to meet the one wife whom Sherlockians all agree upon, Mary Morstan. After an appropriate courtship lasting long enough to satisfy Mary Morstans employer, Mrs. Cecil Forrester, the pair "married" in late spring of 1889. Was this the closest Watson came to a real marriage up to this point? As he appears to have stayed with her until her death in 1894 (the "recent bereavement" Holmes speaks of in "Empty House"), it may well have been. But as Mary Morstan Watson is the most widely known of all Watsons wives, we wont dwell upon her today.

Instead, let us move on to the woman I think might have been Watsons best wife of all, a woman who has never been given enough credit for her "intensely womanly" qualities. Wife number six . . . The death of Mary Morstan in 1894 was not something Watson would quickly recover from. He remained single from that time until the turn of the century  a sure sign of his affection for Mary. The sixth, and last, woman that Watson would take as a wife would have to take a lot of time helping Watson find his heart again, but this woman had time. She also had a lot more going for her, as youll soon see. For just like it goes in that old Vanessa Williams song, Watson saved the best for last. "The good Watson had deserted me for a wife, the only selfish action which I can recall in our association," Holmes reports firsthand in "The Adventure of the Blanched Soldier." But why, after all Watsons wives prior to 1903, was Sherlock Holmes suddenly calling Watsons marrying a "selfish action"? Watson has moved out before.

Watson has even stolen a girl that Holmes showed some small interest in before, as Holmes admitted to hoping Mary Morstan could join them in the detective business. So what made taking the 1903 wife so much more selfish than any of Watsons other wives? Well, this time, Watson stole the one woman from Holmes who made it possible for the detective to continue his life at 221B Baker Street. Five other Mrs. Watsons had come and gone without affecting Sherlock Holmes or his vocation in the slightest. This time, however, things were going to be different. This time, Watson would marry, and, very soon after, Sherlock Holmes would retire to Sussex. Why? Well, youve probably guessed by now, but lets take a minute to recap Watsons marital existence. First came Lucy Ferrier, Watsons young love that was a product of a different time and a place, a love that could not survive a move across an ocean. Second came Norah Creina, probably the most passionate of the Mrs. Watsons, whose candle burned too hot, too fast.

Third was Miss Morrison, the ethereal foreshadowing of Mary Morstan, who both stole Watson from Norah and could not live in her shadow, passion-wise. Fourth was the seductress Flora Millar, who was everything Watson wanted her to be . . . as long as he behaved the way Professor Moriarty liked. Fifth time was the charm, and it looked like Watson might have really found his match in Mary Morstan. Only the fates had other ideas. And in the sixth position was a woman who had known the loss of a spouse, just as Watson had. A woman as loyal and true as a man could want, and a woman who shared Watsons regard for Sherlock Holmes. And last but not least, a woman who once and for all proved what Holmes always said about John H. Watson: "You see, but you do not observe." We dont know if Watson finally learned to observe, or if Holmes had to once again point things out to him, but the last Mrs. Watson could be no one else but the former Mrs. Hudson. Dr. Watson and Mrs. Hudson are the match truly made in Sherlockian heaven . . .

also known as 221B Baker Street. Moviemakers have always like portraying Mrs. Hudson as an older woman, but think about it  those same moviemakers also like portraying Watson as an older man. Mrs. Hudson is thought to be of Scottish descent, and so is Dr. Watson. In fact, these two have so much in common, you have to wonder why they didnt get together earlier. Well, starting off in a landlady/tenant relationship set their original view of each other in a very strict mode. Even if Mrs. Hudson had been the most attractive woman on Earth, Watson couldnt show interest in her without jeopardizing both he and Holmess living arrangements. But as the years passed, and Sherlock Holmes made both of them wealthy beyond the need for rent or renting, that worry disappeared. Watson could have lived anywhere, and Mrs. Hudson could have rented to anyone  or no one, once Holmess "princely payments" stacked up high enough. But Watson kept coming back to Baker Street . . . do we honestly think that was only because he liked living with Sherlock Holmes? Watson could have been Holmess friend and partner while living elsewhere.

He did it enough times when a wife was in the picture. He certainly could have done it without a wife, and hes showed us what a horrible room-mate Holmes could be. So why keep coming back to Baker Street? The answer has been in front of our faces all along. Watson came back to Baker Street for Mrs. Hudson. And Mrs. Hudson probably had a lot more patience with Holmes because of the other man who came as a part of the Holmes/Watson package. Did the two eventually leave Baker Street together, to establish a life without their fellow lodger? "The good Watson had deserted me for a wife, only selfish action which I can recall in our association," Holmes said. And on his sixth try, it looks like Watson finally got it right. Sherlockian.Net: The Case for the Real Dr. Watson Sherlockian.Net: The Case for the Real Dr. Watson by Rod Starling (cardstar@ptd.net) The question as to the reality of Sherlock Holmes has remained unresolved for decades. However, if the reality of his biographer, Dr. Watson can be established, the reality of Sherlock Holmes may follow as a natural consequence.

This paper will therefore set out the case for the reality of Dr. Watson. The stories of Sherlock Holmes, the world’s first consulting detective, come to us through the published writings of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. Sir Arthur was a physician who was also a prolific writer. His early works included short stories and historical novels, some of which were published before he ever wrote a Sherlock Holmes story. In order to develop what may have been the actual events that lead up to the publication of the Sherlock Holmes saga, it is necessary to note and consider the few salient points that follow. In the first place, it must be noted that the first Sherlock Holmes story was a full-length novel called A Study in Scarlet which was written in 1886 and published in 1887. The book begins with a Part 1 that is stated as “ Being a Reprint from the Reminiscences of John H. Watson, M.D., Late of the Indian Army Medical Department ”. Two things seem a little odd here. First, as will be shown later, referring to the book as a “Reprint” of something by John H. Watson, M.D. may have more significance than was originally realized by the initial reading public.

Most of the early readers considered Sherlock Holmes a work of pure fiction but others considered him to be a real person right from the beginning. It will shortly be seen that there is something to be said in the stories themselves for both points of view. The second odd thing about A Study in Scarlet is that when Sir Arthur wrote it, he was only 26 years of age and yet both Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson emerge as full blown characters and the stories were recounted with a certain maturity of style and content that one would consider to be quite unusual in such a young person. Creative genius is no doubt accountable to some extent. However, it must be remembered that Sir Arthur’s other works did not capture the attention of the public to anything near the extent to which the Sherlock Holmes stories did. No, there was something special about the Sherlock Holmes stories and it is that “something” that can hopefully be identified as “reality”. Creative genius has shown itself before and since but no character, not even those of Dickens, Poe, Defoe or any others, has had the lasting impact of Sherlock Holmes. Walt Disney was a creative genius and yet his character, Mickey Mouse, did not come upon the world stage fully blown.

Disney’s early efforts show the beginnings of Mickey in a character called “ Oswald”. Later, a closer character called “ Steamboat Willie “ appeared who finally evolved into Mickey Mouse. It was a gradual process. Not so with Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson. They arrived on the scene fully developed. It seems very probable that there did in fact exist a real “consulting detective” who may at first have been a patient, and later a very good friend and room-mate, of a very real Dr. James Watson. That detective and Dr. James Watson evidently had a close relationship even to the point of working together on the detective’s cases, and the good doctor took to making notes about them. For some reason, Dr Watson never got his notes into story form and never published anything about the detective’s cases himself. Sir Arthur and Dr. James Watson were friends and both were writers and members of the Portsmouth Literary and Scientific Society. However, when Sir Arthur joined the Portsmouth Literary and Scientific Society in 1883, having already achieved the status of a published author in his own right, it would appear that an arrangement was made whereby Sir Arthur would put Dr. James Watson’s notes into story form for publication.

And so it came to be, three years later in 1886, that Sir Arthur wrote the novel A Study in Scarlet, the first of sixty Sherlock Holmes stories. For some reason, Dr James Watson did not want his true name used in connection with the stories, particularly since it was apparently also arranged that Sir Arthur would have permission to add fictionalized stories to the true cases. However, Sir Arthur’s attempt to hide Dr Watson’s name was not very serious. At first, he chose the name Ormond Sacker but apparently Dr. Watson was not happy with that choice. All that Sir Arthur did therefore was to change the doctor’s first name from James to John and to add a middle initial of “H” without ever disclosing what it stood for. But even at that and as we shall see, Sir Arthur could not resist giving some hint that it was Dr. James Watson who was involved. Sir Arthur was born and raised in Scotland and there is a Scottish name “Hamish” which is the English equivalent of “James” It is therefore reasonably conjectured that the “H” in John H. Watson stands for Hamish, the English equivalent of James.

In the Sherlock Holmes story entitled “The Man With the Twisted Lip”, published in 1891, Sir Arthur actually casts Dr. Watson as “James”, not “John”. Was that a slip of the pen or was it because Sir Arthur could not get it out of his mind that Dr James Watson was the real narrator with respect to the actual cases? It seems obvious that the latter is the case. To strengthen that belief, consider this: “ The Man With the Twisted Lip ” was annotated in the 1993 Oxford University edition of The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes, where it is reported that on March 4, 1908, seventeen years after publication of “The Man With the Twisted Lip”, Sir Arthur again referred to Dr. James Watson in a letter to the editor of the Strand magazine. In it he stated that he could see no reason why he could not do an occasional story “…. under some such heading as “Reminiscences of Mr. Sherlock Holmes (Extracted from the diaries of his friend, Dr. James Watson)”!!! That would seem to be fair proof of where Sir Arthur got his factual Sherlock Holmes stories.

Notice also that 22 years after he wrote A Study in Scarlet, which he prefaced as “Being a Reminiscence of John H.Watson, etc.”, he again referred to the fact that the further stories that he proposed to write would be taken from an independent source which in the first instance, A Study in Scarlet, he names as John H. Watson, M.D. and in the second, as Dr. James Watson. Many of the details of the Sherlock Holmes stories, including the factual and physical settings, the residence at 221 Baker Street and the various and numerous parties to the plots, are too convoluted to analyze in this paper for the purpose of confirming the reality of the stories themselves. It appears that some were based on carefully screened facts and that others were pure fiction. There is, however, one observation that should be made in regard to the reality versus fictional aspect of the stories. In some, the fictional nature is obvious while in others there are many references to actual places, events and even people, although the exact identities of the latter are masked behind fictional names. Many times actual locations are referred to except with respect to places where the crimes or major action actually take place.

Those locations are fictionalized which leads one to believe that in such cases, the stories are based on real events and thus the need to screen the actual locations. There are many instances of this in the stories and one particular case comes to mind that is illustrative of the point. In “ The Adventure of the “Three Gables”, published in 1920, reference is made to a certain professional gossip named Langdale Pike to whom Sherlock Holmes often turned for helpful information. That story informs us that Langdale Pike, obviously a fictional name, “spent his waking hours in the bow window of a St. James Street club” In the excellent book Sherlock Holmes in London by Charles Viney, there is a photograph, taken in 1907, of a Hansom cab standing outside Boodle’s Club in St. James's Street, London. The photo not only shows what the caption calls “…..its famous bow window ” but also, upon close examination, a man standing in it! There were, at the time, four clubs in St. James's Street but only one had a bow window.

Clearly then, Sir Arthur in 1920, was in possession of notes relating to a very real professional gossip who took as his vantage point the real bow window of the real Boodle’s Club and there is that photographic evidence of it taken 16 years before the story was published! Based on the above, it may be concluded that Dr James Watson, for reasons we will never know, chose to collaborate with Sir Arthur in the publication of notes that he made concerning his association with a certain real “consulting detective”. The name of that detective has come down to us, as Sherlock Holmes and we are unable to confirm or deny the accuracy of it. It is probably accurate. Sir Arthur considered trying to mask the first name as “Sherringford” but eventually decided against it. There is one final observation to be made in support of the contention that Sherlock Holmes was a real person. In his Preface to The Case Book of Sherlock Holmes, Sir Arthur first explains that after the completion of the Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes, he had determined to end the stories because at the time, he felt that his literary energies should not be directed too much into one channel.

He then goes on to state, however, that he never regretted deciding, later on, to continue them. In particular, he said: “Had Holmes never existed I could not have done more, though he may perhaps have stood a little in the way of the recognition of my more serious work.” It seems very clear then that we have Sir Arthur’s own word for it that Sherlock Holmes did indeed exist! Fact or fiction, it has rightly been noted that Sherlock Holmes has been subsumed into the collective consciousness and someone else who wrestled with the question of his reality put it very succinctly: “Sherlock Holmes is a man who never lived and will never die,” and that is as much as any man could hope for and a happy note upon which to end this paper. Dr. John Watson (Character) Dr. John Watson (Character) from "Sherlock" (2010) The content of this page was created by users. It has not been screened or verified by IMDb staff. There may be more photos available for this character. To select more photos to be displayed in this character's gallery, click the Edit Photos link. Overview Dr. James Watson is a veteran who served as an Army...

See more » Alternate Names: Docteur Watson / Doctor John H. Watson / Doctor Watson / Doktor Uotson / Doktor Vatson / Dr Watson / Dr. Joan Watson / Dr. Johanna Watson / Dr. John H Watson / Dr. John H. Watson / Dr. John Hamish Watson / Dr. Watson / Jamie Watson / Jane Watson / Joan Watson / John H. Watson / John H. Watson, M.D. / John Watson / Johnny 'Juan' Watson / Le docteur Watson / Older Watson / Watson Filmography ... aka "Sherlock V Monsters" - USA (TV title) ... aka "Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's Sherlock Holmes" - USA (complete title) ... aka "Sôru îtâ" - Japan (original title) ... aka "Soul Eater Late Show" - Japan (English title) ... aka "CSI: Las Vegas" - South Africa (English title) (informal alternative title), USA (syndication title) ... aka "C.S.I." - USA (short title) ... aka "CSI: Weekends" - USA (promotional title) ... aka "NBC's Saturday Night" - USA (complete title) ...

aka "SNL" - USA (informal title) ... aka "SNL 25" - USA (alternative title) ... aka "Saturday Night" - USA (first season title) ... aka "Saturday Night Live '80" - USA (sixth season title) ... aka "Saturday Night Live 15" - USA (fifteenth season title) ... aka "Saturday Night Live 20" - USA (twentieth season title) ... aka "Saturday Night Live 25" - USA (twentyfifth season title) ... aka "Sherlock Holmes: The Sign of Four" - USA (DVD box title) ... aka "The Return of Sherlock Holmes: The Sign of Four" - USA (video box title) ... aka "Young Sherlock Holmes and the Pyramid of Fear" - UK (video title), USA (original script title) ... aka "Pyramid of Fear" - New Zealand (English title) (alternative title) ... aka "Priklyucheniya Sherloka Kholmsa i doktora Vatsona: Sobaka Baskerviley" - Soviet Union (original title) ...

aka "The Hound of the Baskervilles" - , International (English title) (imdb display title) ... aka "Priklyucheniya Sherloka Kholmsa i doktora Vatsona: Smertelnaya skhvatka" - Soviet Union (original title) ... aka "Mortal Fight" - USA (as Dr. John H. Watson) ... aka "Sherlock Holmes and Saucy Jack" - USA (alternative title) (as Dr. Watson) ... aka "Sherlok Kholms i doktor Vatson: Krovavaya nadpis" - Soviet Union (original title) ... aka "The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson: Bloody Signature" - International (English title) (literal title) ... aka "Prelude to Murder" - USA (working title), USA (DVD title) ... aka "Sherlock Holmes: Dressed to Kill" - USA (DVD title) (as Dr. John H. Watson) ... aka "Sherlock Holmes: Terror by Night" - USA (DVD title) (as Dr. John H. Watson) ...

aka "Sherlock Holmes in Pursuit to Algiers" - USA (series title), USA (DVD title) ... aka "Sherlock Holmes and the Woman in Green" - USA (promotional title) ... aka "Sherlock Holmes: The Woman in Green" - USA (DVD title) (as Doctor John H. Watson) ... aka "Sherlock Holmes: The House of Fear" - USA (DVD title) ... aka "Sherlock Holmes and the Spider Woman" - USA (review title) ... aka "Sherlock Holmes in the Spider Woman" - USA (DVD title) ... aka "Sherlock Holmes and 'The Sign of the Four'" - USA (alternative title) ... aka "The Sign of Four" - USA (short title) (as John H. Watson, M.D.) ... aka "Adventures of Sherlock Holmes; or, Held for a Ransom" - USA (alternative title) ... aka "Brotherhood 2.0" - USA (original title) ... aka "Brotherhood 2.0.0.9" - USA (new title) ... aka "The Vlog Brothers" - USA (new title) ...

aka "Basil, the Great Mouse Detective" - Australia (imdb display title), International (English title), UK (alternative title) ... aka "The Adventures of the Great Mouse Detective" - USA (reissue title) ... aka "Scotland Yard: The Golden Thread" - USA (original title) Additional Details Dr. Joan Watson : [coming downstairs] Hey, are you going to get the-? [sees Gwen in the living room, wearing Sherlock's t-shirt and little else] Gwen Lynch : Hey! Sherlock's still asleep, I wasn't sure if I should get the door. I'm Gwen. You're the companion, right? Gwen Lynch : [laughs] I guess I should get dressed. [Watson turns off the TV, then goes to the foyer to open the door] Olivia Lynch : Sorry, I wasn't sure if you wanted me to get the-! Oh, you're not Sherlock. [Watson does a double take] Olivia Lynch : You're the companion, right?

[...] John Watson | Baker Street Wiki | Fandom powered by Wikia Edit In the debut Holmes story A Study in Scarlet , Watson, as the narrator, describes meeting Holmes, their subsequent sharing of rooms at 221B Baker Street , his attempts to discover the profession of his taciturn companion, Holmes's eventual taking of Watson into his confidence, and the events surrounding their first case together. Watson describes Holmes and his methods in too romantic and sentimental a manner for Holmes' taste. In time, they become close friends. In The Sign of Four , John Watson met Mary Morstan , who became his wife. Mary seemed somewhat less sure of her husband, however, absentmindedly calling him "James" in the short story " The Man with the Twisted Lip ". This may be a simple typographical error, though some have speculated that it is a wifely reference to Watson's unknown middle name, which could have been "Hamish" (Scottish for "James") Dorothy Sayers, creator of the detective Lord Peter Wimsey, also wrote several essays on Holmesian speculation, later published this theory in Unpopular Opinions. Watson is a physician of some experience (as was Conan Doyle ).

Watson had served in the British Army medical corps in Afghanistan , but was discharged following an injury Watson gives two separate locations for the Jezail bullet wound he received while serving in the British Army. In A Study in Scarlet he states "I was struck on the shoulder by a Jezail bullet, which shattered the bone and grazed the subclavian artery." However in The Sign of the Four, Watson informs us "... [I] sat nursing my wounded leg. I had had a Jezail bullet through it some time before, and though it did not prevent me from walking it ached wearily at every change of the weather". " The Adventure of the Noble Bachelor " contains the only other reference to the injury. Here Watson is a little ambiguous; he tells us "the Jezail bullet which I had brought back in one of my limbs as a relic of my Afghan campaign throbbed with dull persistence." received in the line of duty during the Battle of Maiwand. Watson was almost killed in the long and arduous retreat from the battle, but was saved by his orderly, Murray.

He was also struck with fever and was invalided out of the Army with a half pay officer pension of 11 shillings and 6 pence a month. When Watson first returns from Afghanistan, he is "as thin as a lath and as brown as a nut." His more normal appearance is hinted at in " The Adventure of Charles Augustus Milverton ": "... a middle-sized, strongly built man--square jaw, thick neck, moustache ...". In The Hound of the Baskervilles he notes that he is "reckoned fleet of foot". By 1914 (in the story " His Last Bow "), he is described as "thickset". He is evidently not ill-favored, as Holmes several times jokes about Watson's success with women.

Not very much is written about his family-his deceased father had the same initials as his son and was prosperous enough to own a 50 guineas watch; he had a elder brother also deceased whom Holmes after studying the heirloom watch deduces that although he was relatively prosperous he was also careless and was addicted to strong drink; pawned his heirloom watch four times (although he redeemed the pledges) and the reminder of his brother's life is a very painful subject for John Watson personally. By the time Watson comes back from India, he admits to having no living kin in England. Personality Edit Watson is not a stupid man (he is, after all, a medical doctor, and one whose talents Holmes holds in the highest esteem), but he does not have Holmes' insight. He serves as a foil to Holmes: the ordinary man against the brilliant, emotionally-detached analytical machine that Holmes can sometimes be. With the two, Conan Doyle created a clever literary pairing: two vivid characters, different in their function and yet each useful for his purposes. Watson is well aware of both the limits of his abilities and Holmes' reliance on him: "[Holmes] was a man of habits... and I had become one of them... a comrade...

upon whose nerve he could place some reliance... a whetstone for his mind. I stimulated him... If I irritated him by a certain methodical slowness in my mentality, that irritation served only to make his own flame-like intuitions and impressions flash up the more vividly and swiftly. Such was my humble role in our alliance." Conan Doyle portrays Watson as a capable and brave individual, whom Holmes does not hesitate to call upon for both moral and physical assistance: "Quickly Watson, get your service revolver!". Watson occasionally attempts to solve crimes on his own, using Holmes's methods. For example, in The Hound of the Baskervilles , Watson efficiently clears up several of the many mysteries confronting the pair, and Holmes praises him warmly for his zeal and intelligence. However, because he is not endowed with Holmes's ability to focus on the essential details of the case, he meets with limited success in other cases, as Holmes remarks "Quite so... you see, but you do not observe." However, as a military man, Watson is the better strategist, besting his friend at chess, who prefers to observe.

In the story " The Adventure of the Solitary Cyclist ", Watson's attempts to help Holmes with an investigation prove unsuccessful because of his unimaginative approach, e.g. asking a London estate agent who lives in a particular country residence (according to Holmes, what he should have done was "gone to the nearest public house" and listened to the gossip). Watson is too guileless to be a proper detective; as Holmes observes in The Valley of Fear , he has a definite strain of "pawky humour", but he is naturally open and straightforward, while Holmes can be secretive and devious. Though initially their relationship was little more than vaguely acquainted roommates, the two became the very best of friends, almost like brothers. By the time they shared " The Adventure of the Three Garridebs ", Holmes had such an attachment to his friend that he nearly panicked at the thought that Watson had been shot. Watson wrote: "It was worth a wound it was worth many wounds to know the depth of loyalty and love which lay behind that cold mask. The clear, hard eyes were dimmed for a moment, and the firm lips were shaking. For the one and only time I caught a glimpse of a great heart as well as of a great brain.

All my years of humble but single-minded service culminated in that moment of revelation." Holmes returns to himself only when he is assured that Watson has been merely scratched by the bullet, adding to the perpetrator that "...if you had killed Watson, you would not have got out of this room alive." Though he never masters Holmes's deductive methods, Watson is acute enough to follow his friend's reasoning after the fact. In " The Adventure of the Norwood Builder ", Holmes notes that John Hector McFarlane is "a bachelor, a solicitor, a Freemason, and an asthmatic". Watson comments, in his narratorial role: "Familiar as I was with my friend's methods, it was not difficult for me to follow his deductions, and to observe the untidiness of attire, the sheaf of legal papers, the watch-charm, and the breathing which had prompted them." Similar episodes occur in " The Adventure of the Devil's Foot ", " The Adventure of the Solitary Cyclist ", and " The Adventure of the Resident Patient ".

Watson is something of a ladies' man (boasting in The Sign of Four of "an experience of women which extends over many nations and three separate continents") and fans of the Conan Doyle stories have long speculated as to just how many times he was married. Watson as archetype of the sidekick Edit In Conan Doyle 's early rough plot outlines, Sherlock Holmes' sidekick was named "Ormond Sacker" before Conan Doyle finally settled on "John Watson". In turn, the introduction of Dr Watson in the Holmes novels proved a precursor to other, similar characters. Many of the great fictional detectives have their Watson: Agatha Christie's Hercule Poirot, for example, is accompanied by Captain Arthur Hastings. In the words of William L. De Andrea, "Watson also serves the important function of catalyst for Holmes's mental processes. [...] From the writer's point of view, Conan Doyle knew the importance of having someone to whom the detective can make enigmatic remarks, a consciousness that's privy to facts in the case without being in on the conclusions drawn from them until the proper time.

Any character who performs these functions in a mystery story has come to be known as a 'Watson'." In 1929, English crime writer and critic Ronald Knox stated as one of his rules for fledgling writers of detective fiction as that the stupid friend of the detective, the Watson, must not conceal from the reader any thoughts which pass through his mind; his intelligence must be slightly, but very slightly, below that of the average reader." Misconception of Watson as being a fool Edit In a number of film adaptations , in particular those featuring the comic skills of the actor Nigel Bruce , the character of Watson became more of a caricature. Far from being the able assistant as presented by Conan Doyle , Watson was portrayed as an incompetent fool. Modern treatments have returned to the roots of Conan Doyle stories and have portrayed a more sympathetic and competent Watson. The most famous example of this restored image of Watson is the depiction played by David Burke and later Edward Hardwicke in the 1980s television series The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes , starring Jeremy Brett in the title role.

At the end of the episode "The Empty House", Watson even speaks the lines (given to Holmes in the story) about the criminal's motives, and receives Holmes' warm praise for his acumen. Another well-liked depiction was by actor André Morell in the 1959 film version of The Hound of the Baskervilles. Other depictions include Donald Houston , who played Watson to John Neville 's Holmes in A Study in Terror (1965); a rather belligerent, acerbic Watson portrayed by Colin Blakely in Billy Wilder 's The Private Life of Sherlock Holmes (1970), in which Holmes was played by Robert Stephens ; and James Mason 's portrayal in Murder by Decree (1978), with Christopher Plummer as Holmes. Ian Hart portrayed a young, capable and fit Watson twice for BBC television once opposite Richard Roxburgh as Holmes (in an adaptation of The Hound of the Baskervilles) and for a second time opposite Rupert Everett as the Great Detective in the new story Sherlock Holmes and the Case of the Silk Stocking .

Stephen King , the American horror novelist, wrote a short story called The Doctor's Case in the collection Nightmares & Dreamscapes, where Watson actually solves the case instead of an impressed Holmes. Holmes is also in "Hound of the Baskervilles" In the 1988 parody film Without a Clue the roles of a bumbling Watson and an extremely competent Holmes are reversed, in the film Holmes is an invention of Watson played by an alcoholic actor to allow Watson to work on solving cases behind the scenes. Cultural References Edit Microsoft Corporation named the debugger in Microsoft Windows "Dr Watson". In the television series House, the character of Dr James Wilson is meant to be a direct reference to Watson, (with House himself being a direct reference to Holmes). In addition to the similarity of their names, Wilson serves in the show as House's only real friend and confidante, and occasionally assists him in solving particularly difficult cases (it should also be mentioned that in one episode House claims to live in 221B Baker Street ). Also, in keeping with Watson's role as a ladies' man, Wilson has been married several times and had multiple affairs.

John Watson (Sherlock) - Fanlore John Watson (Sherlock) Blogger and partner of Sherlock Holmes, army doctor (retired), occasionally works at a clinic Title/Rank: Sherlock Holmes (flatmate), Sarah Sawyer (romantic interest), Mrs. Hudson (landlady), Harriet "Harry" Watson (sister) Fandom: Dr. John Watson is the flatmate and assistant of Sherlock Holmes in BBC's TV miniseries Sherlock . The character is a modern-day incarnation of the original Victorian-era John Watson of the Sherlock Holmes series . He is played by Martin Freeman . Canon Recently returned from war in Afghanistan, John Watson is introduced to Sherlock Holmes through a mutual friend because he is looking for a flat-share. John begins assisting Sherlock on cases, moves in with him, and begins blogging about their work together . At the beginning of the series, John has a psychosomatic limp, intermittent tremors in his left hand, nightmares about his time in the war, arguably has PTSD, and is seeing a psychologist. Spending time on cases with Sherlock seems to help John cope with his war-related issues, and by the end of the first episode he is no longer limping.

John has a sister Harriet "Harry" Watson who he doesn't get along with. He begins seeing Sarah Sawyer romantically in the second episode, and is known to have had at least three girlfriends after her (the "one with the spots," the "one with the nose," and Jeanette "the boring teacher"). In Series Three, he gets engaged to and then marries Mary Morstan . Fandom Fandom loves John for his jumpers (especially a certain 'oatmeal' one) and really loves giving him his limp back, bringing up the psychological trauma from his time in war, and shipping him with Sherlock. Fandom also frequently mentions his connection to hedgehogs often using "hedgehog" as a nickname, his love of jam (originating here) and spelling of his name "JAWN." War, PTSD and Mental State John Watson is introduced with lingering psychological issues regarding his service in the Afghanistan war, such as dreams/nightmares, a psychosomatic limp, an intermittent tremor in his hand, and arguably PTSD.

Although by the end of the episode these issues no longer seem to be in effect, fans enjoy exploring them in fanfiction, such as character studies and hurt/comfort , where the issues might be ongoing or more complicated. A common complaint by fans is that the show removed his limp and war-related issues too quickly, and even hand-waving away any more complex mental or physical trauma . Fans are, of course, eager to correct this in fanworks where John often revisits his cane, gets tremors in his hand, and still has nightmares. John is also depicted as an adrenaline junky in some fanworks, based mostly on Mycroft's assessment of John missing the war. The adrenaline rush of being with Sherlock Holmes on cases is sometimes attributed to PTSD-related thrill-seeking behavior. John's shown in a deep depression when he copes with Sherlock's apparent death, many fanworks take this to show that the following period of time while Sherlock is absent, John will revert to requiring his cane again (frequently an observation made by Sherlock, noticing from afar).

Since the show made the point ambiguous, fan speculation also argues whether or not he is aware of Jim Moriarty's death, so a few fanworks have shown him haunted by the PTSD of the loss of Sherlock and the fear and threat of Jim still out there. This has made many fics create a suicidal John Watson, sometimes one who takes his own life only for Sherlock to return and discover his death, others who have him saved by supportive characters like Mycroft or Lestrade. Sexuality Fans are happily depicting John as bisexual. John has a canonical interest in women; he tries to pick up 'Anthea' , dates Sarah Sawyer, and then marries Mary Morstan. He also seems comfortable with the topic of sexuality, particular his "It's all fine" comment to Sherlock during their awkward dinner conversation on relationships. It's common, when addressing John's sexual history in fanfic, to include references to both male and female partners. It was also brought up and well-received in this meta post on John being bisexual by rachel2205. Pairings John is most commonly paired with Sherlock Holmes (see Sherlock/John ), as well as just about every other character in the show.

John's most prevalent het relationship is the canonical John/Mary. [1] A few other prevalent ships are John/Mycroft (along with Sherlock-John-Mycroft tug-of-war fic), and John/Lestrade. Fanworks Examples Wanted : Editors are encouraged to add more examples or a wider variety of examples. John Watson shimeji by Sadynax - an adorable animation of John crawls around the screen Meta

Question: What was Doctor Watson’s first name?
Answer: John