British prime minister assassinated - May 11, 1812 - HISTORY.com British prime minister assassinated Publisher A+E Networks In London, Spencer Perceval, prime minister of Britain since 1809, is shot to death by demented businessman John Bellingham in the lobby of the House of Commons. Bellingham, who was inflamed by his failure to obtain government compensation for war debts incurred in Russia, gave himself up immediately. Spencer Perceval had a profitable law practice before entering the House of Commons as a Tory in 1796. Industrious and organized, he successively held the senior cabinet posts of solicitor general and attorney general beginning in 1801. In 1807, he became chancellor of the exchequer, a post he continued to hold after becoming prime minister in 1809. As prime minister, Perceval faced a financial crisis in Britain brought on by the country’s extended involvement in the costly Napoleonic Wars. He also made political enemies through his opposition to the regency of the Prince of Wales, who later became King George IV.

Nevertheless, the general situation was improving when he was assassinated on May 11, 1812. His assassin, though deemed insane, was executed one week later. Related Videos The Assassination of the Prime Minister, Spencer Perceval | The Public Domain Review ..or BROWSE BY TAG The Assassination of the Prime Minister, Spencer Perceval Only once has a British Prime Minister been assassinated. Two hundred years ago, on the 11th May 1812, John Bellingham shot dead the Rt. Hon. Spencer Perceval as he entered the House of Commons. David C. Hanrahan tells the story. Illustration of the shooting, artist unknown. (Source: Norris Museum) On Monday 11 May, 1812, an unremarkable, anonymous man, just over forty years of age, made his way to the Houses of Parliament. The man had become a frequent visitor there over the previous few weeks, sitting in the gallery of the House of Commons and carefully examining the various members of the government through his opera glasses. At 5.00 p.m.

on this particular day he walked into the lobby that led to the House of Commons and sat near the fireplace. No-one could have known that he was carrying, concealed on his person, two loaded pistols. As it was a fine evening Mr. Spencer Perceval, the Tory First Lord of the Treasury, or Prime Minister, had decided to dispense with his carriage and walk from No. 10, Downing Street, to the Houses of Parliament. He arrived there around 5.15pm, entered the building and walked down the corridor towards the lobby entrance to the House of Commons. He handed his coat to the officer positioned outside the doors to the lobby. As Mr. Perceval entered the lobby a number of people were gathered around in conversation as was the usual practice. Most turned to look at him as he came through the doorway. No-one noticed as the quiet man stood up from beside the fire place, removing a pistol from his inner pocket as he did so. Neither did anyone notice as the man walked calmly towards the Prime Minister. When he was close enough, without saying a word, the man fired his pistol directly at Mr. Perceval’s chest.

The Prime Minister staggered forward before falling to the ground, calling out as he did so words that witnesses later recalled in different ways as: “I am murdered!” or ‘Murder, Murder’ or ‘Oh God!’ or ‘Oh my God!’ Amid the confusion, a number of people raised Mr. Perceval from the ground and carried him into the nearby Speaker’s apartments. They placed him in a sitting position on a table, supporting him on either side. Most ominously, the Prime Minister had not uttered a single word since falling on the floor of the lobby, and the only noises to have emanated from him since had been a few pathetic sobs. After a short time Mr. Smith MP, on failing to find any perceptible sign of a pulse, announced his terrible conclusion to the group of stunned onlookers that the Prime Minister was dead. The Assassination of Spencer Perceval, illustration by Walter Stanley Paget (1861-1908) from Cassell's Illustrated History of England. Vol.5 (1909) Before long Mr. William Lynn, a surgeon situated at No. 15 Great George Street, arrived on the scene and confirmed that Mr. Smith was indeed correct.

The surgeon noted the blood all over the deceased Prime Minister’s coat and white waistcoat. His examination of the body revealed a wound on the left side of the chest over the fourth rib. It was obvious that a rather large pistol ball had entered there. Mr. Lynn probed an instrument into the wound and found that it went downwards and inwards towards the heart. The wound was more than three inches deep. The Prime Minister, who was not yet fifty years of age, left behind a widow, Jane, and twelve children. In the shock of what had happened, the assassin was almost forgotten. The man had not attempted to escape as he might well have done amid the confusion. Instead, he had returned quietly to his seat beside the fireplace. The identity of the man was revealed as John Bellingham, not a violent radical but a businessman from Liverpool. The details of his story soon began to emerge. As a result of a dispute with some Russian Businessmen, Bellingham had been imprisoned in Russia in 1804 accused of owing a debt. He had been held in various prisons there for the next 5 years. Throughout all of this time he had pleaded with the British authorities for assistance in fighting his cause for justice.

He believed that they had not given his case sufficient attention. Bellingham was finally released from gaol and returned to England in 1809 a very bitter man. He felt deep resentment against the British authorities and immediately set about seeking financial compensation from them for his suffering and loss of business. Once again, however, Bellingham felt that he was being ignored. He petitioned the Foreign Secretary, the Treasury, the Privy Council, the Prime Minister, even the Prince Regent, but all to no avail. No one was willing to hear his case for compensation. Finally, he came to the insane decision that the only way for him to get a hearing in court was to shoot the Prime Minister. Detail from a painting of The Prime Minister, Spencer Perceval, in the year of his death, 1812, by George Francis Joseph. (Source: National Portrait Gallery) On the Friday following the assassination of the Prime Minister, John Bellingham did indeed get his day in court, but only to answer a charge of murder. His trial took place in a packed court room at the Old Bailey, presided over by Sir James Mansfield, the Lord Chief Justice of the Common Pleas.

The tall, thin Bellingham came before the court wearing dark nankeen trousers, a yellow waistcoat with black stripes and a brown greatcoat. The members of his defence team first attempted to get the trial postponed on the grounds that they had not been given sufficient time to prepare for the case. Mr. Peter Alley, Bellingham’s chief counsel, told the court that he had only been given the case the day before and that he had never even met Mr. Bellingham until that very day. He asserted that given adequate time, in particular to find medical experts and witnesses in Liverpool who knew Mr. Bellingham personally, he was confident he could prove his client to be insane. The Attorney General, Sir Vicary Gibbs, on behalf of the prosecution, argued vehemently against any such postponement. Ultimately Mr. Allen’s request was unsuccessful and the trial proceeded. The Attorney General set about dismantling the reason Bellingham had given as justification for his heinous act by arguing that the Government had been aware of what had happened to him in Russia, had examined his claims and had rejected them. He also rejected any notion that Bellingham was insane.

He said that Bellingham had been well able to conduct his business and had been trusted by other to conduct theirs without any hint of insanity on his behalf. Titlepage from the pamphlet 'The Trial of John Bellingham for the Wilful murder of the Right Hon. Spencer Perceval, in the lobby of the House of Commons' (Source: National Library of Medicine) When his time came to speak, Bellingham continued to base his defence upon what had happened to him in Russia: his unjust arrest for a debt he did not owe and the failure of the British Government to assist at that time and since. Before outlining the details of his experience in Russia, he stated that he was pleased the judge had not accepted his counsel’s arguments alleging his insanity. He made it clear that although he believed what he had done to be necessary and justified, he bore Mr. Perceval or his family no personal malice: Gentlemen, as to the lamentable catastrophe for which I am now on my trial before this court, if I am the man that I am supposed to be, to go and deliberately shoot Mr. Perceval without malice, I should consider myself a monster, and not fit to live in this world or the next.

The learned Attorney General has candidly stated to you, that till this fatal time of this catastrophe, which I heartily regret, no man more so, not even one of the family of Mr. Perceval, I had no personal or premeditated malice towards that gentleman; the unfortunate lot had fallen upon him as the leading member of that administration which had repeatedly refused me any reparation for the unparalleled injuries I had sustained in Russia for eight years with the cognizance and sanction of the minister of the country at the court of St. Petersburg. Bellingham was clear about where he felt the blame lay for Spencer Perceval’s death: A refusal of justice was the sole cause of this fatal catastrophe; his Majesty’s ministers have now to reflect upon their conduct for what has happened. . . . Mr. Perceval has unfortunately fallen the victim of my desperate resolution. No man, I am sure, laments the calamitous event more than I do. In the end, of course, his arguments for justification had no influence upon a judge and jury shocked by his horrific murder of the Prime Minister.

The Lord Chief Justice even became openly emotional and began to cry at one point during his statement to the jury: Gentlemen of the jury, you are now to try an indictment which charges the prisoner at the bar with the wilful murder . . . of Mr. Spencer Perceval, . . . who was murdered with a pistol loaded with a bullet; . . . a man so dear, and so revered as that of Mr. Spencer Perceval, I find it difficult to suppress my feelings. He dismissed any idea that Bellingham might have been insane at the time of committing the crime: . . . there was no proof adduced to show that his understanding was so deranged, as not to enable him to know that murder was a crime. On the contrary, the testimony adduced in his defence, has most distinctly proved, from a description of his general demeanour, that he was in every respect a full and competent judge of all his actions. In such circumstances it is no surprise that John Bellingham was found guilty of Spencer Perceval’s murder by a jury that took only fourteen minutes to reach a verdict. On the following Monday he was executed and his body sent for dissection to St.

Bartholomew’s hospital. He is remembered in history as the only assassin ever of a British Prime Minister. Following his execution John Bellingham's skull became the subject of research for phrenologists, representing the head of a destructive personality. Shown here is a comparison of Bellingham's skull with that of a 'Hindoo', from A System of Phrenology (1834) by George Combe The Assassination of Prime Minister Spencer Perceval|MurderMap - London Homicide Reported Direct from The Old Bailey Case synopsis: Only one British Prime Minister has ever been assassinated. Spencer Perceval was shot in the Palace of Westminster in 1812 after serving just three years in office. During that time he presided over an unstable government, a financial crisis and a series of setbacks in the Napoleonic wars. But it was the bitterness of a bankrupt businessman that lay behind his murder. John Bellingham, an export trader, had become obsessed with gaining compensation for his six-year imprisonment in a Russian jail. It is thought he had personally approached the Prime Minister for help.

After a final failed visit to the foreign office, he bought two pistols and hid them in a secret compartment in his coat. On May 11 he travelled to Parliament and waited until Spencer Perceval walked from the House of Commons chamber into the lobby. Bellingham then took out a gun and shot him in the chest. The Prime Minister is reported to have said 'I am murdered. I am murdered' before collapsing with a fatal bullet wound to the heart. 19th century engraving of the shooting of Spencer Perceval inside the House of Commons Bellingham, a 35 year-old father-of-three, simply sat down and waited to be arrested. His trial at the Old Bailey took place just four days later. He pleaded not guilty to murder and told the jury his actions should be a lesson to future Prime Ministers. Bellingham said: "Recollect, Gentlemen, what was my situation. Recollect that my family was ruined and myself destroyed, merely because it was Mr Perceval's pleasure that justice should not be granted; sheltering himself behind the imagined security of his station, and trampling upon law and right in the belief that no retribution could reach him.

"I demand only my right, and not a favour; I demand what is the birthright and privilege of every Englishman. Gentlemen, when a minister sets himself above the laws, as Mr Perceval did, he does it as his own personal risk. If this were not so, the mere will of the minister would become the law, and what would then become of your liberties? "I trust that this serious lesson will operate as a warning to all future ministers, and that they will henceforth do the thing that is right, for if the upper ranks of society are permitted to act wrong with impunity, the inferior ramifications will soon become wholly corrupted. Gentlemen, my life is in your hands, I rely confidently in your justice." Despite his pleas, he was convicted of murder and hanged in front of Newgate Prison on May 18. The Lord Chief Justice told him: "You have been convicted by a most attentive and a most merciful jury, of one of the most malicious and atrocious crimes it is in the power of human nature to perpetrate - that of wilful and premeditated murder!

"You have shed the blood of a man admired for every virtue which can adorn public or private life - a man, whose suavity and meekness of manner was calculated to disarm all political rancour, and to deprive violence of its asperity. "By his death, charity has lost one of its greatest promoters; religion, one of its firmest supporters; domestic society, one of its happiest and sweetest examples; and the country, one of its brightest ornaments - a man, whose ability and worth was likely to produce lasting advantages to this empire, and ultimate benefit to the world." Nearly two hundred years later, in 2001, the killer's descendent Henry Bellingham was elected MP for North West Norfolk. In a feature on the BBC website , he is reported as saying: "I've always avoided raising the murder myself and I wouldn't bring it up in conversation that I'm a descendant - or a near-descendant - of a murderer of a prime minister. But I don't try to deny it." Prime Minister Spencer Perceval (left) and assassin John Bellingham (right) Further reading: A transcript of the trial can be found on the Old Bailey online website .

More details on the career of Spencer Perceval can be found on the Victorian Web site and there are wikipedia articles on both Perceval and Bellingham. The image of Perceval is a painting by George Francis Joseph. ‹Back to Map Mailbox: Send us your comments about this item.... we will pick out and publish the best ones: Mailbox@murdermap.co.uk Back to top› The assassination of Prime Minister Spencer Perceval, 1812 The assassination of Prime Minister Spencer Perceval, 1812 The assassination of Prime Minister Spencer Perceval, 1812 Blackleaf The only British Prime Minister ever to be assassinated was Spencer Perceval in 1812...... The Assassination of Spencer Perceval The assassination of Spencer Perceval, 1812 Spencer Perceval (external - login to view) was one of the younger sons of John Perceval, 2nd Earl of Egmont (external - login to view) who first sought a career in the law and then politics.

He first entered Parliament in 1796 and having served as both Solicitor-General (external - login to view) and Attorney-General (external - login to view) he became the Chancellor of the Exchequer (external - login to view) in 1807 following which he became Prime Minister in October 1809 and remained in office held until the 11th May 1812 when he was shot dead in the lobby of the House of Commons (external - login to view), earning for himself the distinction of being the only British Prime Minister to have been assassinated whilst in office. Poster published in 1811 during the "Luddite Riots". The Frame Breaking Act of 1812 make it a capital offence to break the new-fangled machines that were springing up across Britain, as the nation became the world's first industrialised society. The Luddites were workers, upset by wage reductions and the use of unapprenticed workmen, who began to break into factories at night to destroy the new machines that the employers were using.

Perceval was unpopular in certain quarters, in part due to the allegedly 'repressive' Frame Breaking Act (external - login to view) of 1812 and some of the more radical elements in British society certainly viewed his death as an occassion for celebration. A Colonel Fletcher of Bolton (external - login to view) was to record that he witnessed a man running down the street of his home town, leaping in the air, waving his hat round his head, and shouting "Perceval is shot, hurrah! Perceval is shot, hurrah!", whilst Samuel Taylor Coleridge (external - login to view) said he knew of a public house where it became the custom to drink a toast to the assassin for many years afterwards. However the man who did the deed, one John Bellingham (external - login to view) had his own particular reasons for shooting dead the serving Prime Minister which had nothing whatsoever to do with politics. The unfortunate Mr Bellingham Assassin: John Bellingham John Bellingham was a merchant who had been active in the Russian trade and acted as agent for a number of British companies.

Somehow as a result of his business activities Bellingham incurred the displeasure of the Russian authorities which led to him being held in custody between the years 1804 and 1809. The exact circumstances which precipitated his downfall are confused, but it appears that he was suspected of making a false allegation of insurance fraud regarding the loss of the Soleure (external - login to view) in the White Sea (external - login to view) which apparently led to his initial arrest, but the true cause of his difficulties appears to be have been a dispute with the firm of Dorbecker & Co (external - login to view), in which both parties claimed the other was in their debt. This dispute went to arbitration and Bellingham lost, being held liable for the amount of two thousand roubles which he then refused to pay, and then compounded the problem by trying to flee the country in a presumed attempt to avoid liability.

Although it appears that the British Ambassador Lord Granville Leveson-Gower (external - login to view) had done what he could to help out (including at one time allowing him to hide from the Russian police at his house at St Petersburg (external - login to view)) Bellingham came to the conclusion that his rights as a British subject had been violated and that the British government were therefore liable to compensate him for the losses he had suffered due to the negligence of the ambassador in failing to secure his release. Therefore after the Russians decided to set him free in 1809, he returned to London (external - login to view) and took up lodgings at No. 9 New Millman Street, whilst his wife and child remained in Liverpool, and began conducting a campaign to persuade the government to pay him what he believed he was owed. He contacted his Member of Parliament Isaac Gascoyne (external - login to view), petitioned the Treasury more than once, and even wrote to the Prince Regent (external - login to view) to press his claim.

According to the subsequent testimony of a friend named Ann Billett (external - login to view), Bellingham believed that during his time in Russia (external - login to view) "he had realized more than an hundred thousand pounds", and whilst he admitted that "he had not got the money, but it was the same as if he had; for that he had gained his cause in Russia, and our government must make it good to him". He received some expressions of sympathy but no money and certainly not the ï¿½100,000 he appeared to believe was his due; which being roughly ï¿½4.5 million in today's money, was indeed a considerable sum. Matters came to a head on the 23rd March 1812 when Bellingham wrote to the Bow Street Magistrates (external - login to view) requesting them to once more put the matter before the government and threatened that if the government failed to act then "I shall then feel justified in executing justice myself". The Bow Street Magistrates duly reported the matter to the government, who decided to take no action, since by that time they were well acquainted with Bellingham and regarded him as a harmless eccentric.

At 5.00pm on Monday the 11th May 1812 John Bellingham (external - login to view) entered the lobby leading to the House of Commons (external - login to view) and took a seat near an open fire. Some fifteen minutes later Spencer Perceval (external - login to view) appeared. Bellingham walked up to the Prime Minister, drew a pistol from a concealed pocket in his coat and fired a single shot at the range of only a few feet. Perceval fell to the ground crying "I am murdered! I am murdered!" He was carried to the nearby office of the speaker's secretary where it appears that after a "few convulsive sobs" he died a few minutes later. A doctor was called for, and at around 5.30pm a William Lynn (external - login to view) of Great George Street in Westminster (external - login to view) arrived and examined the Prime Minister. According to his later testimony "I examined his pulse, he had no pulsation, and appeared quite dead". As to John Bellingham, he made no attempt to escape, and having shot Perceval simply returned to his seat and sat down again.

He was approached by Henry Burgess (external - login to view), a solicitor who also happened to be in the lobby at the time, who took possession of the pistol in Bellingham's hand. When asked him if he had another weapon in his possession. Bellingham replied that he did and confirmed that it was loaded, at which point Isaac Gascoyne (external - login to view) appeared who was quite well acquainted with Bellingham, immediately recognised him, and rushed to assist Burgess in disarming him of his second pistol. Also present at the time was Vincent George Dowling (external - login to view) star reporter of The Observer (external - login to view), who helped apprehend the assassin and earned himself a real scoop. Bellingham was then marched off to the prison room of the House and at 1.00am on the following morning he was taken under military escort to Newgate Prison (external - login to view). The trial of John Bellingham The very next day a coroner's court assembled at the Rose and Crown (external - login to view) public house which rapidly came to the inevitable conclusion that Spencer Perceval had been willfully murdered.

The government made a number of urgent inquires to establish whether or not Bellingham was part of some revolutionary plot, but soon came to the conclusion that they were dealing with a 'lone gunman' and so allowed the machinery of justice to proceed. On Thursday 14th May a Bill of Indictment (external - login to view) was made out against Bellingham and laid before a grand jury, charging him with the wilful murder (external - login to view) of the Right Honourable Spencer Perceval and a trial date was set for the Old Bailey (external - login to view). This being the age of speedy justice, the trial began the very next day, the 15th May with the Lord Chief Justice James Mansfield (external - login to view) presiding, the courtroom being very naturally packed with spectators, including the presence of "a great number of ladies, all led by the most intense curiosity to behold the assassin". Bellingham appeared "dressed in a light brown surtout coat and striped yellow waistcoat" with "his hair plainly dressed, and without powder" and "quite undismayed" at the prospect of being on trial for his life.

His defence counsel, Mr Alley immediately made an application to have the trial postponed in order to give him time to procure further evidence supporting his client's insanity, but Justice James Mansfield was unsympathetic and insisted that the defendant now plead. Bellingham initially refused to plead claiming that "All the documents on which alone I could rest my defence have been taken from me and are now in possession of the Crown", but was informed by Justice Mansfield that he first had to plead, at which point Bellingham plumped for a plea of 'not guilty'. The prosecution, led by the Attorney-General Vicary Gibbs (external - login to view), called a series of witnesses to testify to the events of the 11th May, followed by the evidence of a tailor named James Taylor (external - login to view), who had been paid by Bellingham to add the additional concealed pocket to his coat, as well as another witness who testified to having seen Bellingham several times in the galleries at the House of Commons. (The latter two witnesses providing of course evidence of premeditation.) The curious thing about the defence was that Bellingham and his counsel advanced quite different arguments in support of his plea of not guilty.

Speaking in his own defence Bellingham claimed that he was perfectly sane as far as he was aware, and argued that a "refusal of justice was the sole cause of this fatal catastrophe". He claimed that he had no personal grievance against Perceval as such, and would sooner have shot the Lord Gower had the opportunity presented itself. He further argued that since the government had refused to accede to his claims for compensation, he had no choice other than to act as he did, and that his sole purpose in shooting the Prime Minister was to bring the matter to the public attention, believing that this would lead to a recognition of the justice of his claim. He therefore believed that he was perfectly justified in killing Perceval, asserting "what is my crime to the crime of government itself?" adding that "I trust that this serious lesson will operate as a warning to all future ministers". He appears to have had every confidence that he would be acquitted. For his part Mr Alley called a number of witnesses to testify to their belief in his client's "derangement" in support of his contention that his client was not guilty by reason of his insanity.

In his summing up of the case Justice Mansfield dismissed the insanity plea, noting that "it ought to be proved by the most distinct and unquestionable evidence, that the criminal was incapable of judging between right or wrong" and that the defence had failed to so, concluding that Bellingham "was in every respect a full and competent judge of all his actions". He also dismissed Bellingham's own defence of 'justifiable homicide' noting that "Such dreadful reasoning could not be too strongly reprobated. If a man fancied he was right, and in consequence conceived that fancy was not gratified, he had a right to obtain justice by any means which his physical strength gave him, there is no knowing where so pernicious a doctrine might end." After a brief discussion the jury withdrew to further discuss the matter, returning after about ten or fifteen minutes to announce their verdict of guilty. It was only left for Justice Mansfield to pronounce sentence. Beginning with the customary condemnation of the now convicted criminal - "Prisoner at the bar!

you have been convicted by a most attentive and a most merciful jury, of one of the most malicious and atrocious crimes it is in the power of human nature to perpetrate - that of wilful and premeditated murder!" - before taking the trouble to "pass the dreadful sentence of the law", which was of course, "That you be taken from hence to the place from whence you came, and from thence to a place of execution, where you shall be hanged by the neck until you be dead; your body to be dissected and anatomized." The whole trial was over in a day and the only person who appeared to be surprised at the conclusion was Bellingham himself who, as previously mentioned, appeared to be quite confident that he would be acquitted. He later blamed his conviction on the failure of his attorney Mr Alley to produce the necessary witnesses that would have proved his claim. He nevertheless viewed his fate in a calm and collected manner, and wrote a short note to his wife expressing his dismay that it had been his "misfortune to be thwarted, misrepresented and ill-used in life" whilst looking forward to the "happy prospect of compensation in a speedy translation to life eternal".

The execution of John Bellingham Newgate Prison At 5am on Monday 18th May1812, a hazy and wet day, Bellingham awoke, rose and washed and dressed himself. In the streets outside crowds were already gathering. Strong barriers had been placed at the end of every street leading to the prison, and Bow Street runners were stopping and turning back all carriages. At 7.00am the door to the condemned cell swung open and Bellingham was led from the room. He was taken, chained, through a maze of corridors, and after a few minutes, appeared at the debtor's door of the prison, where a scaffold had been erected nearby. Bellingham was taken into a side room and placed before an anvil so that his chains might be removed. Bellingham appeared concerned that he might be hurt whilst the irons were removed, and asked that the blacksmith take special care. The chains were replaced by rope, and his arms were tied behind his back. He took a deep breath and said, "Gentlemen I am quite ready." Bellingham was led, heavily guarded, to the foot of the scaffold. He ascended the steps slowly and looked completely calm.

He was placed onto the trap-door and as the executioner moved forward to place the blindfold around his head, the condemned man requested that, "The business could be done without it." But his request was refused. Reverend Ford and Bellingham began praying, but it was only a minute before the clock began to strike eight. On the seventh strike, the trap door opened and Bellingham fell as far as his knees, the remainder of his body being in full view. At 9.00am the body was cut down, placed in a cart and covered with sacking, and taken to the mortuary of St Bartholomew's Hospital in Bell's Yard. John Bellingham's body was there dissected and examined 'in the furtherance of medical science.' At the time of his execution, Bellingham was aged 35. On his assassination, Prime Minister Spencer Perceval was 50.

================================================== = Some years later the story emerged that a John Williams (external - login to view) of Scorrier House, near Redruth (external - login to view) in Cornwall (external - login to view) claimed to have experienced a prophetic dream (external - login to view) which 'foretold' the events of the assassination. Although as it happens Williams claimed to have dreamt his dream on the night following the assassination, this was still regarded as something peculiar, since this before it was believed that the news of the event could have reached him. According to one later account, "Mr. Williams dreamt that he was in the lobby of the House of Commons, and saw a small man enter, dressed in a blue coat, and white waistcoat. Immediately after, he saw a man dressed in a brown coat with yellow basket buttons draw a pistol from under his coat and discharge it at the former, who instantly fell, the blood issuing from a wound a little below the left breast." His wife was unimpressed and told him it was only a dream, although Mr Williams remained sufficiently enthusiastic about the matter to recount his dream to anyone who would listen. On the following day he was dining with his son-in-law a Mr.

Tucker of Tremanton Castle (external - login to view) when Tucker claimed to recognise the Prime Minister from his father-in-law's description, shortly after which his son Michael Williams (external - login to view) arrived having galloped all the way from Truro (external - login to view), bearing the latest news that had arrived with the evening's mail from London; being of course that a man called Bellingham had shot Mr. Perceval in the lobby of the House of Commons. Apparently some six weeks later John Williams (external - login to view) went to London on business and paid his first visit to the House of Commons, and having viewed the lobby where the crime took place, pronounced that it was exactly as it had appeared to him in his dream. Unfortunately the first public record of this incident was in The Times (external - login to view) of the 28th August 1828, which inspired John Abercrombie (external - login to view), to include it in his book Inquiries Concerning the Intellectual Powers, and the Investigation of Truth (external - login to view) which appeared in 1830, by which time of course, people's memories had been inevitably coloured by subsequent events.

Whilst Spencer Perceval is the only British Prime Minister to have been assassinated this is not to say that others haven't tried. Margaret Thatcher (external - login to view) survived the IRA's Brighton Bomb of 12th October 1984, and her successor John Major (external - login to view) was the main target of an IRA mortar attack on 10 Downing Street on the 7th February 1991. (external - login to view) Last edited by Blackleaf; Jun 2nd, 2007 at 03:34 PM.. British Prime Minister Assassinated | Pocket Book British Prime Minister Assassinated 25 December 2013 by Andy Gryce The assassination of the Prime Minister Spencer Perceval in the lobby of the House of Commons on 11 May 1812 Just over two hundred years ago, on 11 May 1812, John Bellingham, a Liverpool businessman shot dead the Rt Hon Spencer Perceval, the Prime Minister at the time, as he entered the House of Commons. Spencer Perceval is the only British Prime Minister to have been assassinated.

At 5.15 on the evening of Monday 11 May 1812, it being a fine evening, Spencer Perceval walked from 10 Downing Street to the Houses of Parliament to attend a debate in the House of Commons. The debate was to rescind the ‘orders in council’ that prevented nations trading with France. These were the chief plank in Perceval’s policy for the defeat of Napoleon. Outside of the lobby to the House of Commons Perceval handed his coat to the officer positioned outside the doors, but as he entered the lobby a man who had been sat near the fireplace, stepped forward, and without saying a word drew a pistol and shot Perceval in the chest. Perceval fell to the floor, after uttering something that was variously heard as ‘murder’ or ‘oh my God’. They were his last words. By the time he had been carried into the nearby office of the Speaker’s secretary and propped up on a table, he was senseless, although there was still a faint pulse. When a surgeon, William Lynn, arrived from Great George Street a few minutes later, the pulse had stopped, and Perceval was declared dead.

The surgeon noted a wound three inches deep on the left side of the chest over the fourth rib where a large pistol ball had entered. Perceval’s body was taken back to 10 Downing Street, and on the following morning an inquest was held at the Cat and Bagpipes public house on the corner of Downing Street, and a verdict of wilful murder was returned. Spencer Perceval Painting by George Francis Joseph, 1812 © National Portrait Gallery, London Spencer Perceval, the younger son of an Irish earl, was 49 at the time of his death and had been Prime Minister under George III (and the Prince Regent during the ‘madness’ of George III) since 4 October 1809. He was a follower of William Pitt (the previous Prime Minister but one), but described himself as a ‘friend of Mr Pitt’ rather than a Tory. Perceval was opposed to Catholic emancipation and reform of Parliament; he supported the war against Napoleon and the abolition of the slave trade. He was opposed to hunting, gambling and adultery, did not drink as much as most Members of Parliament, gave generously to charity, and enjoyed spending time with his wife Jane and their twelve children.

Perceval’s assassin did not attempt to escape from the House of Commons but calmly returned to his seat beside the fireplace. Sir Banastre Tarleton and Isaac Gascoyne, the two MPs for Liverpool, identified the man as John Bellingham, a merchant from Liverpool. The details of his story soon began to emerge. Bellingham had been imprisoned for debt in the port of Archangel in Russia in 1804 and had been held in various prisons for the next 5 years. The debt had been alleged by the owner of a Russian ship that had sunk in the White Sea, who believed that Bellingham had told Lloyd’s, the shipping insurers, that the loss of the ship was actually sabotage. During his time in prison, Bellingham had pleaded unsuccessfully with the British ambassador in St Petersburg and with British authorities for help with his case. On his release in 1809, he returned to England full of resentment. Bellingham believed the government was morally bound to compensate him for his loss of business.

He petitioned the Foreign Secretary, the Treasury, the Privy Council, the Prime Minister, even the Prince Regent, all to no avail, the main reason being that Britain had broken off diplomatic relations with Russia in November 1808. Once again Bellingham felt that he was being ignored. Finally, he decided that the only way for him to get a hearing in court was to shoot the Prime Minister. John Bellingham drawn at the Sessions House Old Bailey 15 May 1812 Painting by Denis Dighton © National Portrait Gallery, London On the Friday following the assassination of the Prime Minister, the 15 May, John Bellingham was in court but to answer a charge of murder. His trial at the Old Bailey was presided over by Sir James Mansfield, the Lord Chief Justice of the Common Pleas. Mr Peter Alley, Bellingham’s chief counsel, tried to have the trial postponed on the grounds that they had not been given sufficient time to prepare for the case saying that he had only been given the case the day before and that he had never even met Mr. Bellingham until that very day.

He asserted that given adequate time, in particular to find medical experts and witnesses in Liverpool who knew Mr Bellingham personally, he was confident he could prove his client to be insane. The Attorney General, Sir Vicary Gibbs, on behalf of the prosecution, argued vehemently against any such postponement. Mr Allen’s request was unsuccessful and the trial proceeded. The Attorney General in presenting his case argued that the Government had been aware of what had happened to Mr Bellingham in Russia, had examined his claims, and had rejected them. He also rejected any notion that Bellingham was insane since he had been well able to conduct his business and had been trusted by other to conduct theirs without any hint of insanity on his behalf. When his time came to speak, Bellingham said first of all that he was pleased the judge had not accepted his counsel’s arguments alleging his insanity. ‘Gentlemen, As to the lamentable catastrophe for which I am now on my trial before this court, if I am the man that I am supposed to be, to go and deliberately shoot Mr. Perceval without malice, I should consider myself a monster, and not fit to live in this world or the next.

… I had no personal or premeditated malice towards that gentleman; the unfortunate lot had fallen upon him as the leading member of that administration which had repeatedly refused me any reparation for the unparalleled injuries I had sustained in Russia for eight years with the cognizance and sanction of the minister of the country at the court of St. Petersburg.’ Newgate Prison around 1812. The prison was demolished in 1904, and the Central Criminal Court (also known as the Old Bailey after the street on which it stands) now stands on the site Once all the witnesses had been examined (closing arguments by the defence and prosecution were not allowed at that time), Sir James Mansfield addressed the jury, during which he became openly emotional and at one point cried. ‘Gentlemen of the jury, you are now to try an indictment which charges the prisoner at the bar with the wilful murder (here the learned judge was so hurt by his feelings, that he could not proceed for several seconds) of Mr.

Spencer Perceval, (in a faint voice) who was murdered with a pistol loaded with a bullet; when he mentioned the name of (here again his lordship was sincerely affected, and burst into tears, in which he was joined by the greatest portion of the persons in court) a man so dear, and so revered as that of Mr. Spencer Perceval, I find it difficult to suppress my feelings. He dismissed any idea that John Bellingham might have been insane at the time of committing the crime, saying that on the contrary, the testimony adduced in his defence had most distinctly proved that he was in every respect a full and competent judge of all his actions. It was no surprise then that John Bellingham was found guilty of Spencer Perceval’s murder. After a consultation of two minutes and a half in the box, the jury expressed a wish to retire, but took only fourteen minutes to reach a verdict. On the following Monday, 18 May, John Bellingham was hanged in public outside Newgate Prison and his body sent for dissection to St Bartholomew’s hospital nearby.

The full transcript of the trial is here There have been three books about the assassination, the first, The Assassination of the Prime Minister: The shocking death of Spencer Perceval by Molly Gillen was published by Sidgwick and Jackson in 1972, and the second, The Assassination of the Prime Minister: John Bellingham and the Murder of Spencer Perceval by David C Hanrahan was published by The History Press in 2008. The third, Why Spencer Perceval Had to Die by Andro Linklater was published by Bloomsbury in 2012. Linklater adds little to the facts explored by the two previous authors but he explores the possibility that although Bellingham insisted that he wasn’t part of a plot, it was an obvious possibility. Working-class discontent seethed as a result of the harsh economic climate caused by the Napoleonic Wars, and was manifested in the outpouring of popular applause and hurrahs for Bellingham that greeted the news of the assassination when it reached the streets.

William Cobbett, who was at that time imprisoned for political libel, saw from his cell ‘mournful tears’ running down the faces of the crowd at the public execution and ‘heard the unanimous blessings’ and gratitude to Bellingham for having ‘ridded’ them of ‘the leader amongst those whom they thought totally bent on the destruction of their liberties’. But no evidence was ever found of any radicals’ complicity in the murder. Linklater’s alternative theory is that Bellingham must have had financial help during the five months he spent in London seeking redress for his grievance. Although he was supposed to be impoverished, Bellingham paid his bills and did not live frugally. These sponsors, who must have known of Bellingham’s murderous intent, may have stood to gain if the ‘orders in council’ banning all trade with France were rescinded, and that Perceval’s assassination was the means to achieve this. Although Linklater names the conspirators, he produces no hard evidence, so the theory hardly adds up to much of a conspiracy. Bust and memorial to Spencer Perceval in St Luke’s Anglican parish church in Charlton, London.

The body is buried in the sealed family vault under the floor of the church. © Stephen Craven/Creative Commons Licence Perceval was buried on Saturday 16 May, the day after John Bellingham’s trial, in the Egmont family vault at St Luke’s Church, Charlton in south-east London. Perceval was the seventh son of the second Earl of Egmont, a title in the Peerage of Ireland. At his widow’s request, it was a private funeral. There were soon rumours that he had not left his widow, Jane, and his twelve children aged between three and twenty, well provided for. He had just £106 5s 1d in the bank when he died. On the 13 May, Parliament voted to settle £50,000 on Perceval’s children, with an additional annuity of £2,000 for his widow which on her death would transfer to the oldest son, also called Spencer.

And on 15 May, after a some wrangling between the Whigs and Tories, the Commons further agreed to erect a monument to Perceval in Westminster Abbey, and for the younger Spencer Perceval to receive an annuity in his own right of £1,000 per annum to date from the previous Monday, the date of his father’s death. Three years later Jane Perceval married Lieutenant-Colonel Sir Henry Carrand, but was widowed again six years later. She died aged 74 in 1844. In a curious echo from the past, Henry Bellingham, who is descended from a relative of Bellingham’s, was elected in 1983 as the Conservative Member of Parliament for North West Norfolk. But in 1997 he lost the seat by 1,339 votes to the Labour candidate, and this could be attributed in part to the 2,923 votes received by the eurosceptic Referendum Party candidate Roger Percival, who claimed, despite the different spelling, to be descended from Spencer Perceval.

At the time The Independent depicted the local contest, which focused heavily on Britain’s role in Europe, as a conflict between the descendants of the two protagonists from two hundred years previously. This time ‘the roles are reversed with Roger Perceval the assassin lurking in the wings ready to strike at an increasingly nervous Henry Bellingham’ and that it was Labour’s Dr George Turner ‘who could gain the ultimate prize from Mr Percival’s assassination of Mr Bellingham’s election hopes’. However Henry Bellingham was re-elected in 2001, and remains the MP for the North West Norfolk constituency. He was Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign and Commonwealth Office) from 2010 to 2012. He recently failed in his bid to become Deputy Speaker of the House of Commons. May 11, 1812 : British prime minister assassinated Introduction In London, Spencer Perceval, prime minister of Britain since 1809, is shot to death by demented businessman John Bellingham in the lobby of the House of Commons. Bellingham, who was inflamed by his failure to obtain government compensation for war debts incurred in Russia, gave himself up immediately.

Spencer Perceval had a profitable law practice before entering the House of Commons as a Tory in 1796. Industrious and organized, he successively held the senior cabinet posts of solicitor general and attorney general beginning in 1801. In 1807, he became chancellor of the exchequer, a post he continued to hold after becoming prime minister in 1809. As prime minister, Perceval faced a financial crisis in Britain brought on by the country’s extended involvement in the costly Napoleonic Wars. He also made political enemies through his opposition to the regency of the Prince of Wales, who later became King George IV. Nevertheless, the general situation was improving when he was assassinated on May 11, 1812. His assassin, though deemed insane, was executed one week later. Article Details: May 11, 1812 : British prime minister assassinated Author May 11, 1812 : British prime minister assassinated URL john bellingham | Planet Open Knowledge Planet Open Knowledge Only once has a British Prime Minister been assassinated.

Two hundred years ago, on the 11th May 1812, John Bellingham shot dead the Rt. Hon. Spencer Perceval as he entered the House of Commons. David C. Hanrahan tells the story. Illustration of the shooting, artist unknown. (Source: Norris Museum) On Monday 11 May, 1812, an unremarkable, anonymous man, just over forty years of age, made his way to the Houses of Parliament. The man had become a frequent visitor there over the previous few weeks, sitting in the gallery of the House of Commons and carefully examining the various members of the government through his opera glasses. At 5.00 p.m. on this particular day he walked into the lobby that led to the House of Commons and sat near the fireplace. No-one could have known that he was carrying, concealed on his person, two loaded pistols. As it was a fine evening Mr. Spencer Perceval, the Tory First Lord of the Treasury, or Prime Minister, had decided to dispense with his carriage and walk from No. 10, Downing Street, to the Houses of Parliament.

He arrived there around 5.15pm, entered the building and walked down the corridor towards the lobby entrance to the House of Commons. He handed his coat to the officer positioned outside the doors to the lobby. As Mr. Perceval entered the lobby a number of people were gathered around in conversation as was the usual practice. Most turned to look at him as he came through the doorway. No-one noticed as the quiet man stood up from beside the fire place, removing a pistol from his inner pocket as he did so. Neither did anyone notice as the man walked calmly towards the Prime Minister. When he was close enough, without saying a word, the man fired his pistol directly at Mr. Perceval’s chest. The Prime Minister staggered forward before falling to the ground, calling out as he did so words that witnesses later recalled in different ways as: “I am murdered!” or ‘Murder, Murder’ or ‘Oh God!’ or ‘Oh my God!’ Amid the confusion, a number of people raised Mr. Perceval from the ground and carried him into the nearby Speaker’s apartments. They placed him in a sitting position on a table, supporting him on either side.

Most ominously, the Prime Minister had not uttered a single word since falling on the floor of the lobby, and the only noises to have emanated from him since had been a few pathetic sobs. After a short time Mr. Smith MP, on failing to find any perceptible sign of a pulse, announced his terrible conclusion to the group of stunned onlookers that the Prime Minister was dead. The Assassination of Spencer Perceval, illustration by Walter Stanley Paget (1861-1908) from Cassell's Illustrated History of England. Vol.5 (1909) Before long Mr. William Lynn, a surgeon situated at No. 15 Great George Street, arrived on the scene and confirmed that Mr. Smith was indeed correct. The surgeon noted the blood all over the deceased Prime Minister’s coat and white waistcoat. His examination of the body revealed a wound on the left side of the chest over the fourth rib. It was obvious that a rather large pistol ball had entered there. Mr. Lynn probed an instrument into the wound and found that it went downwards and inwards towards the heart. The wound was more than three inches deep.

The Prime Minister, who was not yet fifty years of age, left behind a widow, Jane, and twelve children. In the shock of what had happened, the assassin was almost forgotten. The man had not attempted to escape as he might well have done amid the confusion. Instead, he had returned quietly to his seat beside the fireplace. The identity of the man was revealed as John Bellingham, not a violent radical but a businessman from Liverpool. The details of his story soon began to emerge. As a result of a dispute with some Russian Businessmen, Bellingham had been imprisoned in Russia in 1804 accused of owing a debt. He had been held in various prisons there for the next 5 years. Throughout all of this time he had pleaded with the British authorities for assistance in fighting his cause for justice. He believed that they had not given his case sufficient attention. Bellingham was finally released from gaol and returned to England in 1809 a very bitter man. He felt deep resentment against the British authorities and immediately set about seeking financial compensation from them for his suffering and loss of business. Once again, however, Bellingham felt that he was being ignored.

He petitioned the Foreign Secretary, the Treasury, the Privy Council, the Prime Minister, even the Prince Regent, but all to no avail. No one was willing to hear his case for compensation. Finally, he came to the insane decision that the only way for him to get a hearing in court was to shoot the Prime Minister. Detail from a painting of The Prime Minister, Spencer Perceval, in the year of his death, 1812, by George Francis Joseph. (Source: National Portrait Gallery) On the Friday following the assassination of the Prime Minister, John Bellingham did indeed get his day in court, but only to answer a charge of murder. His trial took place in a packed court room at the Old Bailey, presided over by Sir James Mansfield, the Lord Chief Justice of the Common Pleas. The tall, thin Bellingham came before the court wearing dark nankeen trousers, a yellow waistcoat with black stripes and a brown greatcoat. The members of his defence team first attempted to get the trial postponed on the grounds that they had not been given sufficient time to prepare for the case. Mr.

Peter Alley, Bellingham’s chief counsel, told the court that he had only been given the case the day before and that he had never even met Mr. Bellingham until that very day. He asserted that given adequate time, in particular to find medical experts and witnesses in Liverpool who knew Mr. Bellingham personally, he was confident he could prove his client to be insane. The Attorney General, Sir Vicary Gibbs, on behalf of the prosecution, argued vehemently against any such postponement. Ultimately Mr. Allen’s request was unsuccessful and the trial proceeded. The Attorney General set about dismantling the reason Bellingham had given as justification for his heinous act by arguing that the Government had been aware of what had happened to him in Russia, had examined his claims and had rejected them. He also rejected any notion that Bellingham was insane. He said that Bellingham had been well able to conduct his business and had been trusted by other to conduct theirs without any hint of insanity on his behalf. Titlepage from the pamphlet 'The Trial of John Bellingham for the Wilful murder of the Right Hon.

Spencer Perceval, in the lobby of the House of Commons' (Source: National Library of Medicine) When his time came to speak, Bellingham continued to base his defence upon what had happened to him in Russia: his unjust arrest for a debt he did not owe and the failure of the British Government to assist at that time and since. Before outlining the details of his experience in Russia, he stated that he was pleased the judge had not accepted his counsel’s arguments alleging his insanity. He made it clear that although he believed what he had done to be necessary and justified, he bore Mr. Perceval or his family no personal malice: Gentlemen, as to the lamentable catastrophe for which I am now on my trial before this court, if I am the man that I am supposed to be, to go and deliberately shoot Mr. Perceval without malice, I should consider myself a monster, and not fit to live in this world or the next. The learned Attorney General has candidly stated to you, that till this fatal time of this catastrophe, which I heartily regret, no man more so, not even one of the family of Mr.

Perceval, I had no personal or premeditated malice towards that gentleman; the unfortunate lot had fallen upon him as the leading member of that administration which had repeatedly refused me any reparation for the unparalleled injuries I had sustained in Russia for eight years with the cognizance and sanction of the minister of the country at the court of St. Petersburg. Bellingham was clear about where he felt the blame lay for Spencer Perceval’s death: A refusal of justice was the sole cause of this fatal catastrophe; his Majesty’s ministers have now to reflect upon their conduct for what has happened. . . . Mr. Perceval has unfortunately fallen the victim of my desperate resolution. No man, I am sure, laments the calamitous event more than I do. In the end, of course, his arguments for justification had no influence upon a judge and jury shocked by his horrific murder of the Prime Minister. The Lord Chief Justice even became openly emotional and began to cry at one point during his statement to the jury: Gentlemen of the jury, you are now to try an indictment which charges the prisoner at the bar with the wilful murder . . . of Mr. Spencer Perceval, . . .

who was murdered with a pistol loaded with a bullet; . . . a man so dear, and so revered as that of Mr. Spencer Perceval, I find it difficult to suppress my feelings. He dismissed any idea that Bellingham might have been insane at the time of committing the crime: . . . there was no proof adduced to show that his understanding was so deranged, as not to enable him to know that murder was a crime. On the contrary, the testimony adduced in his defence, has most distinctly proved, from a description of his general demeanour, that he was in every respect a full and competent judge of all his actions. In such circumstances it is no surprise that John Bellingham was found guilty of Spencer Perceval’s murder by a jury that took only fourteen minutes to reach a verdict. On the following Monday he was executed and his body sent for dissection to St. Bartholomew’s hospital. He is remembered in history as the only assassin ever of a British Prime Minister. Following his execution John Bellingham's skull became the subject of research for phrenologists, representing the head of a destructive personality.

Shown here is a comparison of Bellingham's skull with that of a 'Hindoo', from A System of Phrenology (1834) by George Combe ExecutedToday.com » 1812: John Bellingham, Prime Minister assassin 1812: John Bellingham, Prime Minister assassin May 18th, 2012 Headsman Two centuries ago today, the only man to assassinate a British Prime Minister was hanged for his trouble. The man at the end of the rope, John Bellingham , was a Liverpool businessman who had gone to Archangel, Russia to do some export/import trade and there been spuriously accused a debtor and slapped in prison for five years. His target, Spencer Perceval , was the pious Tory heir to the late William Pitt, and famous (or infamous) for his evangelical personal rectitude and an accompanying status-quo smallness.

(He was physically short, too.) “He has looked at human nature from the top of Hampstead Hill,” snorted his contemporary Sydney Smith , “and has not a thought beyond the little sphere of his own vision.”* Though others judge more generously of him, Perceval’s overall reputation is that of the prim caretaker, violently anti-Bonaparte, anti-Catholic, anti-adultery, anti-worker, anti-egalitarian, anti-democratic, anti-slavery. Anti- a lot of things. Anti-cluttering up his schedule was the thing that did him in. John Bellingham returned from his sojourn in the Romanovs’ dungeons in 1809, understandably embittered over his ordeal and the bankruptcy it had driven him into. He then besieged the government with demands for compensation, but met a cold reception all over and got no reply at all for his request to meet with Spencer Perceval. So Bellingham did what anyone would do: he walked up to Perceval at Westminster on May 11, 1812, and shot him dead .

Then the strange perpetrator with the private grievance re-seated himself comfortably by the fireplace (rather than exploiting the hubbub to fly), where he was promptly arrested. They didn’t mess around back then: John Bellingham was on trial for his life four days after pulling the trigger. Nevertheless, as the rumor first spread there were fears — or in some cases, hopes — of Jacobin intrigues afoot. And it’s safe to say that the nation’s magnates had better cause than its underclasses to mourn Perceval. “Among the multitude,” one parliamentarian remembered of those days, “the most savage expressions of joy and exultation were heard: accompanied with regret that others, and particularly the attorney-general , had not shared the same fate.” Clearly something less than fully rational, Bellingham was also more than lucid enough for the hemp. A minister who visited him in the hours before his execution found him unsettlingly unrepentant, and attributed to “the perverse inflexibility of his character” Bellingham’s delusional “self-vindication.

He had accordingly taken his ground, and there he obstinately stood; and the weakness of his allegations only increased the firmness by which he was determined to maintain them.” He had, indeed, maintained them openly at trial , bizarrely casting his homicide as a blow for better government to remind ministers of state to keep longer office hours. Finding myself thus bereft of all hopes of redress, my affairs ruined by my long imprisonment in Russia through the fault of the British minister, my property all dispersed for want of my own attention, my family driven into tribulation and want, my wife and child claiming support, which I was unable to give them, myself involved in difficulties, and pressed on all sides by claims I could not answer; and that justice refused to me which is the duty of government to give, not as a matter of favour, but of right; and Mr. Perceval obstinately refusing to sanction my claims in Parliament; and I trust this fatal catastrophe will be warning to other ministers. If they had listened to my case this court would not have been engaged in this case, but Mr.

Perceval obstinately refusing to sanction my claim in Parliament I was driven to despair, and under these agonizing feelings I was impelled to that desperate alternative which I unfortunately adopted. My arm was the instrument that shot Mr. Perceval, but, gentlemen, ought I not to be redressed; instead of that Mr. Ryder referred me to the Treasury, and after several weeks the Treasury sent me to the Secretary of State’s office; Mr. Hill informed me that it would be useless to apply to government any more; Mr. Beckitt added, Mr. Perceval has been consulted, he would not let my petition come forward. Gentlemen, A refusal of justice was the sole cause of this fatal catastrophe; his Majesty’s ministers have now to reflect upon their conduct for what has happened. Lord Gower is now in court, I call on him to contradict, if he can, the statement I have made, and, gentlemen, if he does not, I hope you will then take my statement to be correct. Mr. Perceval has unfortunately fallen the victim of my desperate resolution. No man, I am sure, laments the calamitous event more than I do.

If I had met Lord Gower he would have received the ball, and not Mr. Perceval. As to death, if it were to be suffered five hundred times, I should prefer it to the injuries and indignities which I have experienced in Russia, I should consider it as the wearied traveller does the inn which affords him an asylum for repose, but government, in the injustice they have done me, were infinitely more criminal than the wretch, who, for depriving the traveller of a few shillings on the highway, forfeits his life to the law. What is the comparison of this man’s offence to government? or, gentlemen, what is my crime to the crime of government itself? It is no more than a mite to a mountain, unless it was proved that I had malice propense towards the unfortunate gentleman for whose death I am now upon my trial. I disclaim all personal or intentional malice against Mr. Perceval.

According to a Frenchman in England at the time, the still-sympathetic public raised for Bellingham’s widow and orphan a subscription “ten times greater than they could ever have expected in any other circumstances.” A few topical books * In Peter Plymley’s Letters, which is full of vituperation for Perceval’s harsh Irish policy … words that could go just as readily for many a reputed statesman in many a time and circumstance over the two centuries elapsed since. I cannot describe the horror and disgust which I felt at hearing Mr. Perceval call upon the then Ministry for measures of vigour in Ireland. If I lived at Hampstead upon stewed meats and claret; if I walked to church every Sunday before eleven young gentlemen of my own begetting, with their faces washed, and their hair pleasingly combed; if the Almighty had blessed me with every earthly comfort — how awfully would I pause before I sent forth the flame and the sword over the cabins of the poor, brave, generous, open-hearted peasants of Ireland!

How easy it is to shed human blood; how easy it is to persuade ourselves that it is our duty to do so, and that the decision has cost us a severe struggle; how much in all ages have wounds and shrieks and tears been the cheap and vulgar resources of the rulers of mankind; how difficult and how noble it is to govern in kindness and to found an empire upon the everlasting basis of justice and affection! But what do men call vigour? To let loose hussars and to bring up artillery, to govern with lighted matches, and to cut, and push, and prime; I call this not vigour, but the SLOTH OF CRUELTY AND IGNORANCE. The vigour I love consists in finding out wherein subjects are aggrieved, in relieving them, in studying the temper and genius of a people, in consulting their prejudices, in selecting proper persons to lead and manage them, in the laborious, watchful, and difficult task of increasing public happiness by allaying each particular discontent. In this way Hoche pacified La Vendee — and in this way only will Ireland ever be subdued. But this, in the eyes of Mr. Perceval, is imbecility and meanness.

Houses are not broken open, women are not insulted, the people seem all to be happy; they are not rode over by horses, and cut by whips. Do you call this vigour? Is this government? On this day.. History of Spencer Perceval - GOV.UK GOV.UK Spencer Perceval Tory 1809 to 1812 Born 1 November 1762, Audley Square, London Died 11 May 1812, Lobby of the House of Commons Dates in office Tory Major acts Regency Bill 1810: due to George III’s ill health the Prince of Wales was appointed Regent. Interesting facts He was the only Prime Minister to be assassinated whilst holding office. The current Conservative MP Henry Bellingham is a direct descendent of the assassin John Bellingham. During a debate on corrupt electoral practices: “I have nothing to say to the nothing that has been said”. Spencer Perceval enjoys the unfortunate distinction of being the only British Prime Minister to die at the hands of an assassin. His political career coincided with a period of upheaval created by the French Revolution.

Having pursued a successful legal career, he was slowly drawn into politics. Why Spencer Perceval Had to Die: The Assassination of a British Prime Minister: Andro Linklater: Bloomsbury Publishing Why Spencer Perceval Had to Die The Assassination of a British Prime Minister Lorem About Why Spencer Perceval Had to Die On 11 May 1812 Spencer Perceval, the British Prime Minister, was fatally shot at close range in the lobby of the House of Commons. In the confused aftermath, his assailant, John Bellingham, made no effort to escape. A week later, before his motives could be examined, he was tried and hanged. Here, for the first time, the historian Andro Linklater looks past the conventional image of Bellingham as a 'deranged businessman' and portrays him as an individual, driven by the anxieties of his family life, by his yearning for respectability and by the raw emotions that convulsed his home town of Liverpool. But as the evidence accumulates, a wider, darker picture emerges. The wildly unpopular Perceval dominated political life as both Prime Minister and Chancellor of the Exchequer.

He, above all, was responsible for oppressing Luddite protestors, for Britain's naval blockade of Napoleonic France, for risking war with the United States. And, almost single-handedly, he was crushing Liverpool's illegal slave-trade. John Bellingham was not alone in hating the prime minister. But did he act alone when he shot Spencer Perceval? And if not, who aided him? Two hundred years later, Andro Linklater examines Bellingham's personal records, his wife's letters and the reports of the Bow Street Runners, London's first detective agency, uncovering strange payments made to the murderer and an untouched historical trail. Catching the threads of conspiracy amid the fevered tone of an age of intense debate over slavery, security of the state and personal liberty, Linklater brilliantly deconstructs the assassination of Spencer Perceval - the only British Prime Minister ever to have suffered that fate - to offer a fresh perspective on Britain and the Western world at a critical moment in history.

Reviews “Andro Linklater's Why Spencer Perceval Had to Die is a beautifully written portrait of an overlooked prime minister and a fascinating account of his assassination during the Napoleonic Wars” – Antony Beevor “Enjoyable if ultimately eccentric survey ... He is entertaining on the temper of the times” – Andrew Holgate, The Sunday Times Ireland “Written with novelistic pace and the literary devices of a potboiler, the book is really two in one. The first, an overview of Perceval's neglected career, is sure-footed and worthy. The second, a breathlessly conspiratorial account of his death, is compulsively readable and wildly implausible” – The Wall Street Journal “Deftly sniffing out political machinations and murderous conspiracies, Linklater has written a richly atmospheric, engrossing and authoritative account of an assassination that, Linklater notes, shook the world 200 years ago as forcefully as JFK's assassination did in our time ” – Publishers Weekly “Andro Linklater makes good use of the excellent copy that this story affords” – Literary Review “Fascinating ... as a popular account of a unique event in British history ...

it stands up well” – London Review of Books “Linklater skilfully unpeels the onion of this enigma to identify the forces that led to the assassination ... an entertaining and deftly structured piece of historical detective work” – Times Literary Supplement “The facts revealed by letters, diaries and court records are fascinating enough. Linklater's book has more value than a historical whodunit. It helps us to understand the turbulent times and series of events that the author believes, inevitably, led to Perceval's assassination. It gives us a genuine understanding of the two key figures: the prime minister and his murderer” – Sunday Express “Fascinating” – Tribune

Question: Which British Prime Minister did John Bellingham assassinate in 1812?
Answer: Spencer Perceval