Whom the Gods Would Destroy Whom the Gods Would Destroy by "When falls on man the anger of the gods, first from his mind they banish understanding." Lycurgus "When divine power plans evil for a man, it first injures his mind." Sophocles "Those whom God wishes to destroy, he first deprives of their senses." Euripides "Whom God wishes to destroy he first makes mad." Seneca "For those whom God to ruin has design'd, He fits for fate, and first destroys their mind." John Dryden "Whom the Gods would destroy they first make mad." Henry Wadsworth Longfellow "We must be mad, literally mad, as a nation to be permitting the annual inflow of some 50,000 dependents, who are for the most part the material of the future growth of the immigrant-descended population. It is like watching a nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre." Enoch Powell (1912-1998), British Conservative Member of Parliament, in a 1968 speech on the dangers of nonwhite immigration that effectively ended his chances for higher office. Fact is often stranger than fiction.

We are often entertained by apocalyptic works of fiction in which humanity, or an important part of it, is threatened with destruction. We are witnesses to the suspenseful efforts of the protagonists to save it. In the world of fact we are also witnesses -- to a real-life drama which is much more than a case of life imitating art. The drama unfolding before us is the gradual diminishment and extinction of the Nordish race through the process of racial intermixture and replacement. Its existence has already suffered major loss and diminishment. Yet the presently dominant morality prohibits Northern Europeans from engaging in any effort to save it, or sympathizing with any such effort, or even caring about its plight. They are not permitted to oppose the ongoing destruction of their race, but are expected to support it. In fiction, a tragedy is a morally significant struggle ending in the destruction or downfall of something or someone of great value or importance. The tragic playwrights of ancient Greece invented the form, emphasizing the role of morality in the conflict. They also originated the classic warning quoted above, that madness precedes, and causes, destruction. But it is the essence of madness that those afflicted by it cannot see it, and scorn as mad those who do.

The divine, ruling or dominant powers that have made them mad, that have turned them against their own vital interests, against themselves, to bring about their own destruction -- through the agency of a self-destructive ideology, religion, morality or system of beliefs and values -- prevent them from being aware of either their madness or the fate it brings upon them. The Nordish race has been turned against itself. It has accepted a dominant ideology or morality, a system of ideas, beliefs and values, that denies and violates its vital rights and interests, promotes its diminishment and destruction, prohibits it from acting to save itself, and condemns as immoral those who do. The result, setting the stage for a classical tragedy, is that the Nordish race has been made effectively mad on racial matters. This tragic phenomenon is the overriding cause of the process of extinction now destroying the Nordish race. Without it, the other causes would be ineffective and soon eliminated. It permits and assists their operation, and prevents any defensive action against them. The dominant ideology, or ruling power, accepted by the Nordish race at the potentially fatal cost of its racial sanity is racial nihilism. Most have no real choice in this matter. They are conditioned or indoctrinated.

Their minds are molded, bent and shaped to fit and conform with the dominant ideology, morality, beliefs and values of racial nihilism almost from birth without fair exposure to alternatives. The combined institutional influence of the news and entertainment media, the educational system, government and churches, the personal influence of academic, political and religious authority figures and leadership personalities, and the peer influence from one's social environment, are difficult to oppose. Those who succeed tend to possess an unusual degree of intellectual, psychological and moral independence and confidence, enabling them to think for themselves, form their own opinions and judgments, and stand alone, if need be, on their principles and beliefs. Whatever the natural and proper loyalties of their genes, most Northern Europeans have been thoroughly conditioned by their environment -- the dominant racial nihilist, anti-Nordish culture -- to be against the vital rights and interests of their race, to regard them as immoral for conflicting with the secondary rights and interests of other races, and to regard those who support them as immoral. This conditioning is so effective in some people as to elicit an almost Pavlovian response, an unthinking, "knee-jerk" reaction of blind indignation against vital Nordish interests and those who support them.

This conditioning begins when the subjects are young, even pre-school age. The young of any species are the easiest prey, being relatively trusting and defenseless. Young people are vulnerable to racial indoctrination. Racial awareness, consciousness and sensitivity grows with age. This is true of all forms of knowledge, experience and wisdom. But knowledge can be suppressed and distorted no less than nurtured and encouraged. The present culture, and its educational system, does not encourage awareness that racial nihilism can cause the nonexistence, by devolutionary intermixture, of the Nordish race. This information, this simple but very important item of knowledge, is not provided by the dominant culture. It is not regarded as a proper subject of concern. The object of racial nihilist education is to instill support for racial nihilism, and this is hindered by recognition of its destructive effects. The purpose of racial nihilist indoctrination is to steal the loyalties, the hearts and minds, of Northern Europeans away from their natural allegiance to their own race and its vital interests, and turn them, or pervert them, against themselves. As the Turks demonstrated with their corps of Janissaries, such soul-stealing efforts are most effective when started very young.

Because of the repression of knowledge about the destructive effects of racial nihilism, much of the support it now enjoys is not the product of well-informed thought. The decision by Northern Europeans to support racial nihilism has generally been ill-informed. This decision is also affected by such factors as racial intelligence, sensitivity, consciousness and awareness, which vary among different people, strong in some and weak (or even nonexistent) in others. The purpose of racial nihilist conditioning is to weaken or repress these factors, to racially desensitize the subject and make them racially unconscious, unaware, unintelligent, insensitive or senseless. As Plato informs us in his famous allegory of the cave, all people are not gifted with the same vision, the same ability to see, to understand or to comprehend. What is clear and obvious to some can neither be seen nor understood by others. People often find it difficult to believe what they cannot comprehend, and often distrust or fear what they do not understand. They cannot appreciate the value of something they are unaware of, or love something they are unconscious of. Racial love, or love of one's race, is not possessed in equal amount by all alike.

The sense of concern, caring, appreciation and affection for one's race, and desire to preserve and protect it, is stronger in some than in others. Those who lack it often cannot understand it. As is all too common among the all too human, they often ascribe values, ideals, emotions and behavior they cannot comprehend, and which they lack, to a negative, ignoble or inferior source of motivation -- such as hatred or mental illness -- rather than to a positive, noble or superior source -- such as love or mental fitness and well-being. To do otherwise would admit their own incapacity. Those who cannot see the effects of racial nihilism -- the destruction of the Nordish race by replacement and devolutionary intermixture -- have much less reason to oppose it than those who can. Those who do not care about the Nordish race, who do not love or value it, who do not care if it lives or dies, have much less reason to oppose racial nihilism than those who do. Those who are not aware of the process of Nordish racial destruction now occurring are much less likely to oppose it than those who are.

Those Northern Europeans who cannot see, who do not care, or who are not aware, are much more likely to support racial nihilism, or at least be complacent about it, than those who can see, who do care, and who are aware. Another major cause of Northern European submission to racial nihilism and their own racial destruction is complacency. Complacency stems from the desire to believe that all is well, or if something is wrong it is only a minor problem, is not a cause for concern, and does not require decisive action. Complacent people conform to the dominant or established culture, accept its beliefs and values, comply with its doctrines and dogma. They do not like to be informed that something is seriously and dangerously amiss, that something important is in dire peril and requires action to save it. They do not like to be told that the existing order, the status quo, is seriously wrong and is destroying something of great value, and that major change is required to prevent its destruction. They do not like to be disturbed from their inertia and false sense of well-being by knowledge that imposes a moral responsibility or duty to act, and resent those who confront them with such knowledge.

Complacency, indifference, unconcern or lack of caring about the survival or destruction of the Nordish race is assisted by racial unawareness and unconsciousness. Because many people are unaware of just what the Nordish race is, and what it includes, they often fail, or are unable, to make connections between various Nordish traits and characteristics and the Nordish race itself. This often results in very inconsistent values and attitudes. They might value many Nordish traits and characteristics (particularly physical traits related to esthetics and beauty, such as Nordish facial features, skin, hair and eye coloration, skin and hair texture, etc.) without connecting them or their existence with the Nordish race itself, separating them from the race which gives them existence, and upon whose continued undiminished existence and well-being their continued undiminished existence and well-being also depends. By failing to make this connection, they might hold ideological beliefs and values which do not value the existence of the Nordish race and deny it the conditions it needs to continue to exist, while at the same time valuing various unique Nordish racial traits and characteristics and opposing anything which might endanger their continued existence.

They fail to connect the race and its traits, and to see that the diminishment or non-existence of one will necessarily include the diminishment or nonexistence of the other. In reality, they cannot be separated. Avoidance or evasion of reality is even worse than the inability to see reality, and even more dangerous, for it scorns and rejects those who can see and are willing to see. "There are none so blind as those who will not see." They willingly embrace ignorance out of fear of knowledge they do not want to know. Like the subjects in the tale of "The Emperor's New Clothes," they do not want to see or know what they are not supposed to see or know, as they believe such sight and knowledge indicates immorality. There is another reason to avoid reality, embrace ignorance and fear knowledge. People frequently wish to be spared knowledge that will cause them pain. The ability to perceive reality, when one's people are undergoing a process of destruction by a ruling power so dominant it seems impossible to stop, is a source of great pain and suffering to those who have it, and who care.

To Northern Europeans who love their race, knowledge of its ongoing diminishment, and awareness of the racial death that awaits it a few generations in the future down its present path, brings the pain of an open, continuously bleeding wound that will not heal. But pain serves a positive and very important purpose. It is a warning. It makes us aware that something is causing us harm, even potentially killing us, to give us a chance to avoid it, to act to protect or save ourselves, to stop the harm or destruction, the hemorrhaging, before it is too late. There are two types of Northern Europeans who do not feel pain at the destruction of their race -- those who do not know and those who do not care. The ancient folk tales of the Nordish race were commonly practical warnings, often in allegorical form, against the dangers of the world. It was hoped that these warnings would be heeded by their audience, and possibly save them from pain or destruction. The existential dangers to life were often symbolized by predatory animals. The wolf was the most common and familiar symbol of these perils. But the greatest threat, peril on the grand scale, was symbolized by the dragon (or great snake, serpent or worm).

The dragon, like the other predators, was the enemy and destroyer of life, but of epic proportions. It hungered to destroy the very source of life itself. The dragon's preferred victim was the virgin, symbolizing the life-source, the center of the race. In this allegorical world, as in the real world, woman was the source of renewed and continued life. The virgin was a woman who had not yet reproduced, the source of new life who had not yet created new life, who had not yet fulfilled her existential purpose, mission and destiny as intended by nature and the powers of Creation. The dragon sought to prevent the virgin from creating new life, from fulfilling her destiny, to preempt life at its source. The virgin, the life-source, was either consumed or hoarded as a prisoner; the most precious part of its hoard of treasure. Either way, she was prevented from fulfilling her purpose, and the continuation of life was catastrophically denied. The dragon is a metaphor for the anti-Creation and anti-Life ideas, beliefs, practices, values and ethics that prevent or discourage the creation, preservation and continuation of life. It is a metaphor for the forces of death.

For the Nordish race, this metaphor is realized in its most dangerous, destructive and life-threatening form in the ideology of racial nihilism. Racial nihilism is the dragon that denies the right of the Nordish race to life, that deprives it of the conditions it requires for continued life, that destroys its life at its source by devolutionary, decreative intermixture, that has already claimed millions of Northern Europeans as its victims -- more than any war or plague -- and threatens it with extinction. It is the dragon of racial death that now rules the Nordish race. The living generations of Northern Europeans have been born in the dragon's cave and have lived all their lives there, under the dragon's spell. For most of them it is the only world they have ever known, or can conceive of. They have learned their values and ethics in this world, with the dragon -- their destroyer and anti-Creator -- as their teacher and law-giver. They judge and measure all ideas and values by the dragon's standards, the only ones they know. They have been taught and believe that the dragon's will and way -- the way of racial destruction -- is the right and just way, and they see everything only through the dragon's eyes.

The only light they know is that provided by the dragon's fiery and destructive breath. They have never seen the light of Creation. Northern Europeans have learned to worship the dragon of racial nihilism as their foremost god, with failure to obey its will as the foremost sin, and failure to worship it as the foremost form of heresy. The foremost form of worship is to feed Northern Europeans to the dragon. It consumes them in small bites or large gulps, as fast as it can, as fast as its willing victims place themselves in its jaws, mesmerized and hypnotized, or as fast as unwilling victims can be pushed into them. Millions have been consumed, bit by bit, a little bite of beauty or talent here, a bigger chunk there. Many have been led, and fed, to the dragon by their friends, teachers, preachers and even their parents, placed by them on the dragon's sacrificial altar. The greater the racial value of the victim the more the dragon desires to consume them, and the greater its pleasure and enjoyment in satisfying its appetite.

In the symbolism of the folklore and chivalric romances that are part of the ancient wisdom of the Nordish race, the hero-knight saves the virgin-princess from the dragon that would have destroyed her and prevented her from creating new life. She is grateful to her champion for her salvation, and they join together in the creation of new life, completing their triumph over the dragon. But the victims of the dragon of racial nihilism, in their madness, have lost this ancient wisdom. They have been conditioned to seek and welcome their destruction, to regard those who would save them as enemies and traitors to the dragon, and to reject and condemn them -- and their efforts -- as evil and immoral. This dragon is the god who seeks to destroy the Nordish race, first making it mad by turning it against itself. Racial nihilism is the established religion, the orthodox faith, of the present culture. All other religions must conform to its values and beliefs or be regarded as irreligious. All members of the culture, of whatever other professed religious affiliation or preference, or of no other religious affiliation, are indoctrinated in its doctrines and dogma from early childhood by every cultural institution, public or private.

Public funds and laws are used to support and enforce its policies and teaching. Tax money is given to those who teach and promote its doctrines, withheld from those who do not. Any expression of disbelief or disagreement is condemned as heresy. The indoctrination of its adherents is often so complete as to produce a dogmatic, and even hysterical, fanaticism which cannot tolerate dissenting opinions or alternative points of view. Racial nihilism is an idolatrous religion. Its idols are the various personalities and celebrities that espouse, or espoused, its doctrines and dogma. Many of the adherents of racial nihilism personify its ideas and values in these idolized personalities. They regard any idea or value which conflicts with those espoused by the idols of these personality cults as heresy. The diverse idols, rightly or wrongly, include such late personalities as John and Robert Kennedy, Martin Luther King Jr., Eleanor Roosevelt, Margaret Mead, John Lennon and Mohandas Gandhi, all enshrined in the racial nihilist pantheon, as well as numerous living political, artistic, entertainment and athletic celebrities. The names of these various idols are invoked to condemn ideas which disagree with the racial nihilist doctrines with which they are associated and identified.

The major denominations of Christianity give their full support to the promotion of racial nihilism. They deny the vital rights and interests of the Nordish race, assist the cause of its destruction, and denounce any desire or effort to save it. They encourage interracial marriage and adoption among their congregations, bring non-Nordish immigrants into the Nordish homelands, and assist their settlement and absorption into the Nordish community. The Christmas holiday, which replaced the yule holiday of the pre-Christian Nordish racial religion, has itself been subverted to promote racial nihilism, which is now hailed as the finest expression of the Christmas spirit. The universalist (non-racial) doctrines and world-view of Christianity have readily embraced the "One World, One Race" ideology in their missionary efforts to gather all the world's races into their faith. This ideology, which would destroy the Nordish race by devolution and replacement, is increasingly equated by Christian leaders with salvation. By this confused reasoning, the souls of Northern Europeans can only be saved if they support the destruction of their race. As Christianity becomes ever more anti-Nordish in its values and teachings, the Nordish race is confronted with religious issues and questions that affect its very survival and continued existence.

Is it evil for the Nordish race to continue to exist, to live? Are the conditions of racial separation and independence required for continued Nordish life evil? Or, is the destruction of the Nordish race by genetic submergence, and the denial of the conditions it needs to exist, the true evil? If religion is worship of, and service to, Creation and Life, what is the pro-Creation and pro-Life answer to the above questions? Certainly, if the Nordish race is to survive, it needs a religion that is for it rather than against it, one that defends rather than condemns its vital rights and interests. It needs a religion that supports its right to racial life, not one that joins the gods who wish to destroy it, and promotes the ideas that are making it mad. Nordish support for racial nihilism is madness. It is a mass psychosis that leads the Nordish race to self-destruction. It turns Northern Europeans against themselves and their own race, alienating them from their natural loyalties. It causes parents to lead and give their children to the racial murder of racial intermixture, ending the racial line or continuum of generations. Suicide and self-destructiveness are not mentally healthy.

When a person or race is against their own existence, and the conditions they require for existence, they are mentally ill. For the Nordish race to accept an ideology that denies its right to live, and the conditions it needs to live, it must be mad. To equate such racially destructive madness with idealism, niceness and love, as the proponents of racial nihilism do, is to equate death with life. The madness of racial nihilism is the madness destroying the Nordish race. The Nordish race will not achieve racial mental health until it recognizes what is racially healthy and unhealthy. The conditions that are conducive to continued, undiminished racial life and well-being are racially healthy. Those that tend toward racial diminishment and nonexistence are racially unhealthy. Those Northern Europeans who support and practice the former conditions are racially healthy, those who support and practice the latter are racially unhealthy. The racially healthy Northern Europeans want their race to live. They have a racial life wish. The racially unhealthy Northern Europeans do not want their race to live, or do not care. They have a racial death wish, by intent or default. The healthy are racial lifeists, and support racial livism, the live and let live racism of the Racial Golden Rule.

The unhealthy are racial deathists, and support racial deathism, the racial nihilist program for Nordish extinction. To achieve racial mental health the Nordish race needs philosophical, ideological, religious and moral health. This is the racial immune system. Health in this area provides the Nordish race with immunity from the self-destructive mental illness of racial nihilism. Lack of health in this area creates an immunity deficiency that weakens its ability to protect itself from the racial nihilist madness. Health in this area enables us to distinguish what is good for us from what is bad for us, what is healthy for us from what is unhealthy, what is wholesome for us from what is unwholesome, what is right for us from what is wrong, what is helpful for us from what is harmful. Without the ability to make such distinctions, and set standards by which such matters can be measured and judged, the Nordish race will soon show the symptoms of racial nihilism and suffer its deadly effects. Ethics, behavior, values and practices cannot be properly judged apart from their results and effects. These effects and results must be made clear and explicit, brought out in the open for all to see and judge without evasion or confusion.

Results and effects are more important than motive or intent. Assertions of positive motivations of goodness, niceness and love should be measured by an objective standard. Creation and Life, and the vital interests of the race, are the objective points of reference by which we should measure and judge all such assertions, and all ethics, values, behavior and practices. It is common for advocates of every idea to claim that it is the position of love, and that its opposition represents hate. With objective points of reference these claims can be properly evaluated. If its effects are harmful to the vital interests of the race, endanger its continued life and threaten to decreate or undo its creation, it should not be accepted as a product or example of goodness, niceness and love. Racial nihilism has such effects. It leads to Nordish extinction through a process of intermixture and replacement. The culture it dominates portrays this racially destructive process -- the genocide of the Nordish race -- as emotionally warm, humorous and the natural result of love.

(Mixed racial families, by marriage or adoption, are a particularly favored theme.) Those Northern Europeans it has made mad accept this portrayal, and believe that goodness, niceness and love achieve their highest expression in actions which violate the vital interests of their race and contribute to its destruction and death. The madness of racial nihilism finds its most complete success in those Northern Europeans who are turned so completely against their race and its vital interests that they deny, or refuse to admit, its very existence, to others as well as themselves. That it even exists is something they cannot bear to contemplate. They will not name it or grant it any recognition, status or legitimacy. If, at some level of their consciousness, they do know that their race really exists, it is only cause for them to hope more intensely for its speedy extinction, to hope more fervently that nothing will save it, to support more strongly the causes of its death, to deny more strenuously its right to life, and oppose more fanatically its continued existence and anything that might save it. Other racial nihilists minimize the value and importance of what will be lost if the Nordish race becomes extinct.

But those who deny its very existence, its identity, its status as a racial-genetic continuum, its past and future generations, its history and potential destiny, do much more than reduce the perception of the value and importance of that which is being destroyed, that which will be lost -- they reduce its extinction to a non-fact, to the destruction of nothing, to the nonexistence of something that never really existed. No form of genocide, or suicide, could be more complete, and no form of madness could be more total. The worst enemies of the Nordish race are to be found within the Nordish race itself. They are those who have been turned against the vital interests of their race, against its very existence, by the maddening effects of racial nihilist ideas and values. A house divided against itself cannot stand, part wanting their race to be free and part wanting it to be enslaved to the interests of other races, part wanting their race to live and part wanting to sacrifice its life on the altar of racial nihilism. The struggle for Nordish salvation is internal, not external, within itself, against the part or side of itself that is against itself.

In this chapter, as Pogo said, "We have met the enemy and he is us." Nietzsche wrote, "That which does not destroy me makes me stronger." But the avoidance of destruction itself requires strength. That which does not destroy us is that which we are strong enough to resist. The madness now destroying the Nordish race, racial nihilism, is succeeding because the Nordish race has lacked the strength to resist it, because the Nordish race has been too weak to oppose its own diminishment and destruction. The lack of strength, the weakness, is not physical, but -- like the madness itself -- spiritual, moral and mental. The weakness is in racial consciousness, racial loyalty, racial caring and racial love. How many Northern Europeans today, especially those in positions of power, prominence or influence, could say that they love and care for their race, and are loyal to it? How many Northern Europeans would admit to such feelings of loyalty, care and love if they had them? The answer is not many but few. This lack of loyalty, care and love is the source of the madness that is destroying the Nordish race. The Nordish race is dying of, being killed by, a lack of care and love.

Those whom the dominant ideology or religion -- the metaphorical god -- would destroy it first makes not to care or love. It must first cause them not to love or care for that which is being destroyed -- themselves. Richard Wagner, with whom Nietzsche often disagreed, believed that love was the answer to all the questions of life, that it was the source of all redemption and salvation, that it alone had the power to overcome the forces of destruction. Perhaps he was right. Perhaps the strength and power the Nordish race needs to redeem and save itself, to overcome the destructive madness of racial nihilism, can only come from love. The Nordish race must learn to love itself, and that may well prove to be the greatest love of all. Racial nihilism is the dominant ideology and religion wherever there are Northern Europeans to serve as its victims. By its values and beliefs Nordish racism -- the love of Northern Europeans for their race, their resistance to that which would cause its diminishment or death, their desire for it to live, to be free, separate and independent -- is equated with hatred. The assertion of vital Nordish rights and interests is regarded as a wrongful violation of the conflicting, non-vital desires of other races.

As racial nihilism is the foremost religion of the modern Nordish lands, so Nordish racism is the foremost heresy. As a heresy it is a victim of many popular misconceptions as to its true nature and intent, its motivation and purpose, means and ends. These misconceptions are propagated by the proponents of the racial nihilist orthodoxy, with the goal of enforcing conformism to the dogma they profess. In their portrayal of Nordish racism their method is to accentuate the negative and eliminate the positive. Their success is best measured by the number of Northern Europeans who accept their teaching and equate the cause of Nordish racial salvation and continued life with hatred and evil. No cause enjoys such universal support and acceptance as the cause of Nordish racial death. No cause suffers such universal condemnation as the cause of Nordish racial life. Nothing is so widely regarded as the highest form of goodness and morality as those values, beliefs and actions which are causing the death of the Nordish race. Nothing is so widely denounced as the worst form of immorality as those values, beliefs and actions which promote continued Nordish life.

Death has never been so popular, and life never so unpopular, as when the life and death in question is that of the Nordish race. For its life's sake, the Nordish race must free itself from the coils of the genocidal dragon of racial nihilism. It must free itself from the spell of the anti-Nordish death song that sings of its destruction and nonexistence. It must learn to sing its life song, the song of racial life that will slay the dragon of racial death. 'Rivers of Blood' - American Renaissance They are still special today, but they are badly led. At some point, they will find the leaders they deserve and do well. bilderbuster You can listen to Powell’s “Rivers of Blood” speech at The White Network. I wish I was a teenager in the 60’s. I imagine that if there were no Blacks & no insane war in Vietnam it could’ve been one of the most exciting times in history to be White in America. Young Werther How on earth could England ( or America) cultivate enough Powells to correct its path toward final destruction? Well, the great communist world movement of abolition of nationhood continues… Question Diversity 1.

I notice Powell died in 1998. George Wallace also died in 1998, and a lot of our 20th century legends that we like so much died that year. 2. On the drive home back from Jefferson City late last night, I passed by Fulton, ironically enough. 3. More than just 1970, but I’m of the opinion that Enoch Powell was almost single handedly responsible for every Tory election win between the time he made the “Rivers of Blood” speech until the end of John Major’s time as PM. I have read that a common phrase repeated among the English electorate in an underground sense through 1970 was, “if you want a n—-r for a neighbour vote Labour.” Homo_Occidentalis The shameless betrayal by his fellow “Conservatives” is damnable. It’s strange how just about anyone who ever makes it to power or media fame holds the same cookie-cutter rainbow coalition views on immigration. I’m not given to paranoia, but it seems to me as though they’ve all been coached, bribed, or threatened. The cultural Marxist elite will get its brown foot soldiers by any means necessary.

HamletsGhost Your suspicions are well-founded. It only remains to see WHO is doing all the coaching, bribing, and threatening. Jotun Hunter I think we have some clues BillMillerTime It’s the Eskimos. DonReynolds It does not matter where they get their advice. They own what they do and will bear the full weight of their bad decisions…… regardless of their “good intentions”. Goldcoaster CFR, Think Tanks, and especially the Big Foundations – Ford, Carnegie, Rockefeller. They are the true enemy. “You will have global government whether you like it or not”. HamletsGhost You’re describing the WHAT. I’m talking about the WHO. Geo1metric A totally controlled media allows for such uniformity. If we are to have any success, we have to figure how to end-run that monster, the media-the enemy. DonReynolds How would you deal with a determined enemy who is powerful and makes no secret about their goal of your own destruction and the destruction of your children? …..particularly an enemy who attacks you and everything you represent every single day? Would you try to buddy up and try to reason with them, cooperate,…..maybe even compromise?

Would your enemy agree to take only half a loaf when they honestly believe they can have the entire loaf? Nancy Thomas Further irony is that you saved this enemy from destruction by killing off many of your own kind, only to have this enemy punish the children and grandchildren of the men who fought on their behalf. The disloyalty is stunning and horrible. george00 A letter with just 2 sentences says a lot of things that a lot of people should spend a lot of time thinking about. Nancy Thomas Exactly, that monopoly beast in a brainwashing mechanism. Everyone should read “Hollywood versus America” by Michael Medved. Goldcoaster oh, the MSM is slowly getting trashed. newspaper readership is way down because of their GD liberal/multiculti brainwashing. notice that Time, Newsweek etc have stopped printing? the worm turns..slowly. Nancy Thomas Money is all it takes. Oil Can Harry I don’t hold Wallace in the same high regard as the greatest British statesman of the 20th century. After all, Powell stuck to his guns until the day he died while Wallace would later claim he only suppported segregation to get elected, privately believing it to be immoral.

Spartacus “A tiny minority of Sikhs, together with allies in the media…” ——————————————————————————————————————— The author does not specify who these “allies in the media are”, but I trust we all know ? Geo1metric That phrase struck me as well; the media are probably our biggest enemy in this country and in fact every Western country. How do we fight that monster? Spartacus Chemical fertilizer is very effective, or so I hear . Goldcoaster cant buy it anymore, they watch it. Spartacus White ingenuity will find a way around it . Hell, if you don’t find any other way, just buy it from Mexico and smuggle it back to your country 😉 LACountyRedneck Our biggest enemy is clearly our government making decisions that are damaging us. They’re living in their posh communities with their families and we’re having to deal with protected and pampered 4th world trash. Whites will have to make a statement with acts of violence for any chance at normalcy. That seems to work for non-Whites. Jotun Hunter we need our own media.

we have the internet and web sites such as this – which we didnt have before – so that’s something Geo1metric We are “preaching to the choir” here except for the occasional new information gleaned from reading these articles and posts. We need to figure out how to reach much, much wider audiences. Let’s hear it for pirate radio!! Jotun Hunter maybe a book or movie that broke the mainstream message intact DonReynolds Still clinging to the idea that you can talk your way out of this or that it can all be resolved peacefully? JohnEngelman Violent actions by white nationalists will be crushed with broad popular support by the government. In 1995 Timothy McVeigh thought the Oklahoma City bombing would start a revolution against the government. Instead it discredited to the militia movement. Spartacus Tymothy McVeigh was not a White Nationalist, and he never intended to start a revolution . He was a libertarian, and he did it as revenge for the Waco massacre . JohnEngelman In the United States there are more libertarians than white nationalists. White nationalism is such an outlier persuasion that pollsters do not even poll for it.

I have read that Timothy McVeigh did think there was enough sympathy for what he represented that his destruction of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building would start a revolution. There was no sympathy for Timothy McVeigh at all. Question Diversity McVeigh’s personal politics were more WN than aracial right-libertarian, but his motivation for his part of OKC (keep digging, and you’ll find Ramzi Yousef) was acting out on aracial right-libertarian motives. Ironically, the Branch Davidians were a race mixing cult. When the Feds moved in, and during the standoff, a (supposed) group of Kluxers protested near the site in FAVOR of the Feds wiping them out. DonReynolds He was not in any militia movement and obviously, no one takes their cues from Tim McV. McV. never talked about the bombing and was executed. There is nothing that says a truck bomb would cause a revolution against the government. Just stay back out of the way, Johnny, and watch. Nancy Thomas John, this response is comical. Timothy was ONE guy with a couple of cohorts.

America has I believe 200 MILLION gun owners who know how to shoot and push come to shove will not hesitate when cornered. Look at what is happening in the Ukraine without guns! Angry people can make miracles happen. JohnEngelman The American people respond negatively to those who initiate the use of violence. Segregationist violence against peaceful civil rights demonstrators won national sympathy for the civil rights movement, and caused the civil rights legislation to be passed. Five years of black ghetto riots, beginning in Harlem in 1964 hardened white attitudes toward blacks, and turned the United States into a Republican country. Ramay Keep clingin’ Don. george00 One half hour race realist prime time TV show a week for about a year or two and we can change the world. JohnEngelman One does not get places in politics by changing people’s minds. One gets places by articulating and channeling sentiments that already exist. The fact that the overall crime rate in the United States has declined since 1980, and the rate of violent crime has declined since 1991 deprives white nationalism of much of the urgency of its message. JohnEngelman One does not get places in politics by changing people’s opinions.

One gets places by articulating and channeling sentiments that already exist. The decline in the rate of violent crime since 1991 deprives white nationalism of much of the potency of its message. The stagnant economy may help the cause of white nationalism. However, right now economic conditions seem to be increasing the popularity of socialism. Nancy Thomas Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight…the decline of violent crime. You might want to get a copy of “White Girl Bleed A Lot.” Geo1metric ” One gets places by articulating and channeling sentiments that already exist.” As has been explained over and over, we have no way to channel and no way to articulate “our message” because the msm will not address the dire conditions of black on White crime, and will not address the wasted trillions of dollars. Nor will the media address the dire straits of White demographic decline world-wide. BTW, I don’t believe those statistics about the decline of violent crime. Has the government ever lied to the people before? I have many contacts in law enforcement around the country, and those people do not believe it either.

I will believe them before I’ll believe politically motivated “polls” and statistics “cooked” for political reasons. JohnEngelman FBI, Uniform Crime Reports are among the most reliable statistics on crime in the United States. If you refuse to accept them there is no point in having a rational discussion with you. You believe what you want to believe. Nancy Thomas And they want to censor and tax the net. Goldcoaster the internet! which is why the likes of Cass Sunstein want to regulate it. george00 Boycott their movies, magazines, news papers and any other product they put out. Spartacus “It is a tragedy that the nation that produced such a loyal and loving son has disappeared forever. ” ——————————————————————————————————————— England isn’t dead, it’s just in a coma. There’s still time to wake up before everything is lost. jackryanvb No White country has declined worse after World War II than Merry Old England. And it can be viewed as Hitler’s revenge on England for taking the Communist, anti White side in World War II , slaughtering German civilians in Dresden and Hamburg.

It was as if the English/British political leadership decided that English people themselves must be terrorized in to being ethnically cleansed from London. To this day, all Western European countries have successful populist, immigration restrictionist political parties except England. Powel was right to talk about “The Gods” bringing Rivers of Blood to England. The destruction of England can not be explained by rational, mortal forces. HamletsGhost Says who? Lots of diseases of antiquity like leprosy and plague were thought at the time to be divine punishments. We now know the rational causes of those diseases and need not fear them as long as we maintain proper hygiene and use proven medicines to stop them. It wasn’t “the Gods” who brought this modern plague, but people who imagine themselves to be. Zaporizhian Sich Indeed, and like the Mad Emperor Caligula who thought he was a god, they will be getting a salutary reminder from the people they oppress they are not gods. They will perish the way Caligula did at the hands of his own body guards, as in a sudden, swift and lethal retaliation. They didn’t just kill him, they killed his wife, then his daughter.

After that, they moved to erase all memory of him, he was a nightmare the people of the Roman Empire were all too happy to put behind them. The same thing awaits those who are trying to destroy us, in the end they and their land of origin will be a hated memory. After all, those whom the Gods seek to destroy, are first driven mad. itdoesnotmatter According to C. Suetonius Tranquillus, in his book, “The Twelve Caesars,” Caligula was blondish, tall, fair and had blue eyes. Suetonius wrote it was his wife’s constant administration of toxic aphrodisiacs that mobilized C’s innate sadism into acted out madness. My overactive imagination wonders if our leaders are not using the other blue pill too much. What is occurring presently, at least in California, feels like acted out hostility and madness. Jotun Hunter everything in human affairs can be explained rationally, though they may be complex. A parsimonious solution to all Englands problems is a strong resurgance of unforgiving nationalism and racial awareness. A novel method of advertising this message must be devised – something to distract the mob from their reality tv shows.

we must keep in mind the mob, even a mob of our own race, will not be motivated by idealism but largely by fear and greed. Gesamtzusammenhang Nonsense like the above is why racialism is marginalized. This “Oh, Britain took the anti-White side.” It’s like you people don’t even read history. Germany was with the Japs, who wanted to take over and rule/kill Anglos in Australia. Yeah, sounds pro-White to me. If Hitler wasn’t an imbecile in terms of military strategy, he could have made better decisions that wouldn’t elicit a negative response from the British. But he wasn’t, and he betrayed the German people in that way. The only thing Hitler did was set racialist thought back by about a thousand years. A world without Hitler would probably have perfectly fine laws against non-whites, America (which had a much longer history of racialist laws, and they were more effective) would still have its pre-1965 immigration laws, and racialism wouldn’t be stained with the Nazi legacy–which began when Hitler invaded other people, declared war on America, and killed millions of Whites. Germans today also would have fared much better.

Einsatzgrenadier Powell enthusiastically welcomed the immigration of West Indian nurses in the late 1950s when he was Tory minister of health, apparently in order to drive down the average wages of indigenous nurses. I believe he also had a hand in flooding the London Transport System with West Indian tube train drivers and bus fare collectors. The article conveniently neglects to mention this. Nevertheless, Powell had a change of heart. He soon came to realize that massive non-white immigration is profoundly evil, senseless and destructive. If his views had been even more widespread among members of the elite, Britain would not be in the same situation it is in today. It’s important to remember that Powell remained a privy councillor ’til the day he died, so he was very much an integral part of a system that was methodically undermining British national sovereignty and identity. Like many a politician, Powell was looking out for himself, rather than for the average Briton. Knowing that there would be a general election in either 1969 or 1970, his Rivers of Blood speech was a cynical ploy to win votes and ensure the election of Heath and his conservatives.

He knew that the best way to achieve a Tory electoral victory was to harden the British public’s attitude to Commonwealth immigration. This did wonders for the Tories at election time in 1970. Because the Tories were closely associated with the anti-immigration rhetoric of Powell, it also allowed them to secretly carry out their very own mass non-white immigration policies while Britain was fast asleep. Question Diversity Re your first paragraph: We should reward people when they first do wrong and evil then have a “come to Jesus” moment then start doing right. But your second paragraph doesn’t make any logical sense. If “Rivers of Blood” was a cynical pre-election season attempt to scam for votes for the Tories, then why did the Tory leadership bash it, trash it, strip Powell of his leadership position, instead of openly embracing and praising both Powell and the speech? You want us to believe that Powell pretended to be an immigration patriot then the Tory leadership pretended to be outraged about it while both were in the background behind some mythical curtains laughing and giggling knowing that there would be more Tory votes because people who want immigration patriotism were going to vote for a party whose leadership was against it. Sorry, that’s too nonsensical to buy.

Einsatzgrenadier You’re quite right, Question Diversity, which is why I deleted the offending paragraphs. I shouldn’t have allowed my penchant for conspiracy theorizing to get the best of me. The only principles we should follow in these matters are those dictated by reason and the available empirical evidence, especially because these are very much on our side. Also, I highly respect your opinions and openly welcome your criticism. I’ll let you in on a secret. I’ll believe any conspiracy theory, but most I don’t believe for more than five minutes. Nancy Thomas I’m just the opposite. I see the term itself as a thought police term used to get people off the scent. jackryanvb Question Diversity Don’t be too hard on him, Jack.

I think it’s just born of frustration that the people are on our side but the public policy isn’t, both in England and in “our” “country.” But the reason for the disconnect is simple, and hardly a conspiracy: It’s because people (on both sides of the Atlantic) who are aware of the immigration issue and are on the right side of it have not yet demonstrated by their electoral and political actions that being for amnesty and open borders and mass non-white legal and legal immigration is an instantly fatal third rail. Sure, we’ll reward people who do right by us well enough, but we haven’t yet developed the habit of rejecting people who do us dirt. In Texas this past Tuesday, the voters in Pete Sessions’s (*) district had the opportunity to turn out the open borders traitor and replace him with a woman that all the immigration patriot groups and the border guards’ association and even Ted Cruz endorsed, but the traitor won anyway. And this is why the open borders treason agenda keeps marching on, because we won’t send the traitors to their political graveyards. They don’t interpret any consequences in doing wrong, so they’ll keep doing wrong.

Oh, but propose that someone’s social security check should be $1 less next year than it is this year, and the sky falls. People can and do have the ability to do third rail politics, just not on the most crucial issues. (*) – No relation to Jeff. Zaporizhian Sich The massive election fraud that pervades the U.S. will lead to civil war and revolution, I’m sure of it. DonReynolds Elections are decided by who gets the most votes. That is not to say, they have a majority of the vote necessarily….but he who gets more votes than anyone else is the winner. Revolutions do not work that way……and that is what is required to stop the Liberal Leftist faction in this country. Geo1metric GenX ANZAC Sounds like his vision ended up being a curse, with his warnings left unheeded. It takes a brave soul to swim against the tide and to sacrifice your own position, while choosing to put your countryman’s prosperity first. This is why I admire Jared Taylor (and his ilk) so, choosing the unpopular, but right path.

Jotun Hunter yes – when I first came across J Taylor on a youtube video I thought ‘this man is completely nuts’ — then while evaluating what I had watched in my brain I realized (despite my initial judgement) that I was inclined to feel he was nuts not for what he was saying (which struck me as completely true) but because he had the audacity to say it aloud. This realization changed my life. Geo1metric That we had 100,000 Jared Taylors!!!! Einsatzgrenadier Good for you man, it’s shows that you think for yourself, what do they say “the truth will set you free”, hopefully that’s true, unfortunately once you’ve taken the red pill there’s no going back. Welcome to the unpopular Right (who’re also right i.e. not wrong). Nancy Thomas Yes, and to face the constant smears and lies takes massive courage. NoMosqueHere It’s difficult to emerge from a hole you’ve dug deep for yourself. But it’s not impossible. Reversing immigration laws is not an impossibility; in fact, it should be no different than reversing or changing any law or practice once it’s deemed no longer useful.

As for the muslims, blacks, hindu-paks, and romanian pickpockets and hookers who have invaded Britain, they should be encouraged to leave. Such encouragement may include financial remuneration. Think of it as an investment in your future. HamletsGhost Idi Amin expelled the Asians from Uganda in one fell swoop. For something that people keep saying is “impossible”, he sure made it look easy. Africa doesn’t have much to offer the West in terms of statecraft, but ethnic cleansing is one area they could teach the world the finer points about. IstvanIN It was easy because Britain took them all in and besides no one was going to go to war in Uganda for Asians. DudeWheresMyCountry? Nobody is going to go to war with The US for Mexicans either. Bossman Mexicans are fellow North Americans and North American integration is growing slowly but surely. American and Canadian businesses are still investing heavily in Mexico. DudeWheresMyCountry? Yet you haven’t moved to Mexico permanently to better integrate with your fellow North Americans… but you won’t be doing that. Why not? Do you need some extra cash for moving expenses? Let me know, I can help.

Bossman The climate is one of the best in the world. When they are fully integrated into North America and their standard of living rises to that of the USA and Canada, it will become the best part of North America but that is going to take some time to happen but it will surely happen. DudeWheresMyCountry? So Mexico needs to integrate to have a high standard of living? Why don’t they become a first-world country on their own as The US and Canada has? You sound like most Mexicans and Blacks… unwitting White supremists, never thinking you can do anything worthwhile without White people. WR_the_realist Just like the rise in Haiti will surely happen. They have a fine climate too. Iceland’s climate sucks totally yet its people are literate and civilized and were the only people with the stones to say no to the banksters after the financial crisis, and refuse to bail them out. DonReynolds Why wait? You can go there now, poncho. Goldcoaster oh god man, standards of living everywhere are DROPPING. wages havent grown, unemployment/dropped out of the workforce is growing, automation is increasing. if their standard of living is “rising”, why the hell do they come here?

Jotun Hunter I’ll contribute to that Geo1metric He doesn’t need to move; Mexico is moving here. DonReynolds I disagree. There is no fellowship of North Americans and they are not long-lost cousins from a time when they all lived happily in a single nation. They are criminal invaders. Bossman Well, there’s NAFTA. Trade between the USA and Mexico is valued at one billion Dollars per day. The leaders of Mexico, Canada and the USA meet every few years to publicly hug each other and promise more North American integration. DonReynolds There are many trade agreements. China even has most favored nation status, but that does not make us integrated, or fellows, or big pals, or working toward union. Bossman China is far away across the mighty Pacific ocean. Mexico is in North America. Zaporizhian Sich I live for the day NAFTA and all other flood America with genocidal invaders while impoverishing white American treaties are torn up publically, then white Americans turning on these invaders and their enablers next. Zaporizhian Sich Fellow North Americans?

Bull****, they are genocidal invaders I and millions of other whites will be forced to kill off or drive out in our lands. You are sadly mistaken! Nancy Thomas Your bizarre out of the blue commentary is like comic relief, totally wrong but very amusing. DonReynolds Just because Asians were expelled from Uganda, does not mean they must be sent to the UK instead. Let them proceed by a much shorter route to their own homeland. IstvanIN The fact remains they were taken in by the UK. DonReynolds How nice. Now they can proceed to their homeland. Nothing says they are suddenly British. Refugees perhaps. IstvanIN You do realize this happened 40 plus years ago? DonReynolds I see….it matters to you that it happened 40 years ago…..so that makes it OK? I do not give a hoot how long ago it was. Do you realize that no matter how long they live in England, they do not become British? IstvanIN Huh? I was simply stating facts. Uganda tossed them out and Britain took them in, not India. And yes, I am aware that it doesn’t make them Englishmen.

You make it sound like London was a stop-over on a flight to Bombay. It wasn’t. The UK made them British citizens. Should they have? No. Did they? yes. DudeWheresMyCountry? Let’s not call Roma “Romanians” as they are just subcontinental Indian generational squatters. The average American thinks Roma are poor White people from central Italy. NoMosqueHere They are not British; they gotta go. DonReynolds He is my financial renumeration…..if you leave the country now, you can escape with all you have stolen. If you wait, your pockets will be empty when you return to your own country. THAT is an effective incentive. DonReynolds Here is my financial incentive to illegal aliens…… If you leave before the deadline, you can take with you all that you have stolen from this country. If you wait until after the deadline, you get a box lunch and a bus ride to the border, with the clothes you are wearing at the time. That is an incentive plan they can understand. TL2014 Just another illustration of the maxim that you cannot have your cake and eat it too. Britain chose to put itself in contact with other races and ethnicities through colonization.

It didn’t have to, but it chose to. That it drastically improved the standard of living wherever it went, and immensely increased its own national wealth in the process is irrelevant. There is always a price to pay for your actions – Britain ran into unforeseen economic and, surprisingly, psychological consequences stemming from its colonialist past. Britain proved incapable of handling the consequences of its own historical decisions in a way that would avoid further negative impact on it. Interestingly, white South Africa faced a similar problem after decades of ruling as a minority over a dysfunctional, hostile majority while relying on the cheap labor that majority provided and, at the same time, allowing significant immigration from surrounding dysfunctional communities. The result is what we see today. An ethnostate is the answer. Always. Jotun Hunter colonization was the best period for a great many of those countries colonized. There is nothing to regret in the expansion of the empire which led to the creation of nations like the US, Canada and Australia.

their ‘atrocities’ are largely rewritten abd exaggerated – and for the most part local peoples were brought out of a state if total naked, cannivalistic savagery, who later saw fit to complain under ideas of independance introduced to them by the european enlightenment ideals of the very colonizers. the only mistake was in allowing them entry to the homelands, which did not occur intil after the world wars and the hidden victory of Hebraic liberal values after the fall of Berlin. ricpic Let’s not forget that the Brit elites who couldn’t bring themselves to put a halt to waves of West Indian and Paki immigrants were the direct descendants of the Oxbridge crew who thought very highly of themselves between the wars for declaring that they would NOT give all for King and Country should there be a second showdown with Germany. You really don’t have to dig deep to understand why the elites in England and here don’t defend their own people, country or culture — they don’t LOVE THEM. Ace Very, very good. The nation will be protected by magic. Immigrants will fit in and contribute because people are basically good. A smidgin of white racism, though. Ooops. That queers the whole deal.

Since even the mention of the words “b___k,” “n___o” or “M____m” is evidence of that tiny, vestigial amount of r____m, well, passports and public benefits all round, please. Ad inf. Ace The British could have handled the “consequences of [their] historical decisions” just fine if they’d decided to do so. That they didn’t is a matter of the delusion and treachery of their elites. Full marks on your ethnostate point. No segregation! No peace! We’ve got integration here in the states and the lies necessary to justify it are: diversity, multiculturalism, nation of immigrants, and propositional nation. It works like a charm. JohnEngelman The reaction to Powell’s speech was divided between popular favor and elite disdain… Powell himself received 100,000 letters of support, and only 800 in protest… Even the working class, who overwhelmingly voted Labour, demonstrated in solidarity. – Jon Harrison Sims, American Renaissance, March 7, 2014 The elite live in safe neighborhoods, sheltered from the crime that is characteristic of third world peoples. They also benefit from the depressing effect immigration has on wages.

Working class whites pay the price for elite ideals and selfishness. WR_the_realist Add to that the fact that in both Great Britain and the United States all major political parties serve the interests of the elites. JohnEngelman The British Conservative Party, and the American Republican Party more obviously advance policies that benefit the economic interests of the rich. They promote a flatter tax system, weaker labor unions, minimum wage laws that lose ground to inflation, and cuts in domestic programs that benefit those who are not rich. WR_the_realist The Democratic Party advocates even more for illegal immigration and massive legal immigration than the Republicans do. When Hollywood wants a draconian enlargement of the copyright law Democrats give it to them. Regulation of Wall Street banks and hedge funds remains lax because so many of those fat cats donate to the Democratic Party. Obamacare doubled many people’s health care insurance costs but was a boon to the insurance companies. When Obama decided to jump into the civil war in Libya this wasn’t done to benefit the poor and working class in America. He was serving the same globalist interests, who want to maintain American military hegemony over the world, that George W. Bush was. JohnEngelman Both parties want more immigration, although for different reasons.

Democrats want more Democrat voters. Republicans want lower wages. As long as massive amounts of money are necessary to win elections the Democratic Party will need to get contributions where it can. Most Democrats favor more restrictions on campaign financing. Most Republicans do not. Obamacare was an ill fated effort to compromise with the Republicans. It is nearly the same as the health care plan Mitt Romney introduced in Massachusetts, and which is popular there. Democrats are much more likely to favor a single payer health plan. This would put the health insurance industry out of business. WR_the_realist Actually every Republican but one voted against Obamacare. So the reason the Democrats chose the program they did had nothing to do with getting Republicans on board. JohnEngelman The Democrats tried and failed to get the support of the Party of “No.” The Democrats should have gone for a single payer health plan. It is popular in Canada. WR_the_realist The fact that Obamacare got passed with only one Republican vote proves that Democrats didn’t need to get the support of the Republicans. If the Dems had wanted a single payer system they could have voted that in instead. It could have passed with no Republican votes.

Sorry, the alleged need to get the support of Republicans just isn’t working as an excuse for the crawling horror known as Obamacare. Ace So the Party of No wouldn’t climb on board the bizarre, disastrous, forced takeover of 1/6 of the economy. No wonder the Dems “tried and failed.” Hooray for TPON. It’s popular in Canada except with those who have to wait six months for an operation. One summer the Canadians shut down a cancer hospital because of the backlog. One more month with cancer. Ho hum. What’s the big rush? And some Canadians love their health care so much they . . . oh, never mind. Ace Effort to compromise? Sheer fantasy. No. Vastly different from Mass. plan. The latter provided coverage to the uninsured but did not force people with insurance to take what the state provided for the uninsured. I could be wrong, but that rarely happens. Goldcoaster which is why the Repubs are out to destroy the Tea Party. They know we will upset the apple cart. Thus, obviously, the racist label. Powell himself received 100,000 letters of support, and only 800 in protest.

Democracy only counts, when the people are asked to answer the right questions. Choosing to trust group A or group B to make the right decisions on you behalf for the next 3/4 years is something else. silviosilver It seems to me Britain did just as you suggest they should do, almost. They were wrong to admit blacks, but according to your outlook inviting in masses of asiatics was one of the best things that country ever did. After all, according to you, there is no conflict of interests between whites and asiatics, and the resultant mix is going to propel the country towards the high IQ utopia that is its destiny. What’s there to complain about? JohnEngelman I use the word “Oriental” to distinguish between Chinese, Koreans, and Japanese, on one hand, and Muslims and Muslims on the other. Chinese, Koreans, and Japanese behave and perform well in other countries. Muslims do not. East Indians also perform and behave well. In the United States they are nearly as successful as Jews. Race realism entails a recognition that the races differ in qualities that enable some races to make positive contributions to civilization, while other races cause problems.

Nancy Thomas It’s the same here, the elites do not have to deal with the diversity they are forcing on the rest of us. LACountyRedneck No more spics, gooks, bantus, sand negroes, J’s, etc. Enough already. drakeshelton The Jesuit order of the Roman Catholic Church deceived us into killing each other because we are Protestant Nations-Russia protested the Papacy being Orthodox. The Jesuits perfected their anti-white racial theology in their South American reductions. Read Vatican Assassins by Eric Phelps. Hal K It is a tragedy that the nation that produced such a loyal and loving son has disappeared forever. Let’s not be defeatist. Modern technology brought the aliens in, and it can move them out just as quickly. Brian Powell was a modern Jeremiah, far-seeing and lamenting, a man of erudition and courage. How I wish we had a thousand more like him. Einsatzgrenadier In 1968, Powell was the only true patriot with the courage to speak out against 3rd world invasion of Britain, at a time when the Tory politicians were too cowardly to stand up to the reckless immigration policies of the establishment.

Although he remained agnostic on questions such as biological race differences in intelligence, he nevertheless shared the same desires as the racially and ethnically chauvinistic 3rd world immigrants who were busy colonizing his native homeland. Like the racial foreigners who would never tolerate the invasion of their 3rd world countries of origin, Powell also wanted to protect his land against the barbarian hordes. After all, Britain was his land, a land which had nurtured his ancestors since the end of the last Ice Age 14,000 years ago. He wasn’t going anywhere. If anyone had to get out, it was the brutal, vicious 3rd world immigrants. celtthedog Um, sounds good, except that Andrew Roberts is a neocon and Simon Heffer is a blowhard. Both men have disparaged Powell on television. Enoch Powell was the best Prime Minister we never had, so I am concerned about some of these contributors. Great article though. A hero, patriot and statesman; deliberately misunderstood by some. Jotun Hunter with proper idols like this in mind we can return to a natural standard of excellence Zaporizhian Sich Mr. Powell’s all too correct predictions have fallen on deaf ears.

Now the 21rst century is shaping up to be even worse for whites globally. The elites behind this demonstrate one undeniable truth about “die-versity,” and that is one’s tolerance is inversely proportional to one’s distance from it. The elite until now never have to face “die-veristy,” while working class whites suffer tremendously because of it. The best way for us to strike back is to bring die-versity to their doorsteps. Geo1metric A lot of tolerance = a lot of distance. A little tolerance = a little distance. With that I can agree. Einsatzgrenadier Another way of putting it: Diversity + Proximity = WAR! Zaporizhian Sich What would make my day would be Norwegian men showing up with machine guns and grenade launchers, then mercilessly gunning these invaders down in the streets. Geo1metric “Clearly” most US citizens do not know and the reason is clear; the US media choose not to tell Americans the truth about what is going on there. Nancy Thomas And I wonder why they won’t tell us….. PouponMarks Only an “extremist” from the Right can rescue and restore what Leftist extremists have done to America over the last 60 years.

Removing those individuals from the academia, gummint, and the media that represent treason, sedition, betrayal, and subversion alone requires extremism in the restoration of liberty and freedom, and adherence to the Declaration and Constitution. If a ship has veered so far off course from extreme left rudder, it will require extreme right rudder to simply restore the proper course. Nancy Thomas The elite would never allow such a person to rise. Sadly, I think that it will eventually come to violence. E_Pluribus_Pluribus Powell: “. . . the homogeneity of England, so profound and embracing” == Founding father John Jay in Federalist No. 2: “Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people — a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs…” shmo123 Treaties are inconvenient things, aren’t they? Nancy Thomas Powell was a brilliant prophet. Eric Clapton gave a rant about immigration back in 1975 and mentioned Enoch. They were both right. Eric Clapton? Really?

Jotun Hunter cannibalism was widely in practice among north american natives as well, who were in a state of perpetual tribal warfare. They also routinely enslaved and tortured as well as ate each other. There were many rituals involving rape. Do you honestly believe the Margaret Mead myths of the ‘noble savage’ living in idyllic bliss? Would you expect it of any people living ‘closer to nature’ like that, IQ differences aside? Many of the African states did not have so much as the wheel. Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) was one of the worlds wealthiest nations under colonization. if living that way is preferred why do so few do it now? Give up year round food, police stations, hospitals, and go live naked in the wild? Because its a hard, hard life. Were they not brought literacy, knowlege of the world, geography, history, more? what if ottoman turks or chinese had discovered the new world instead? they may have slaughtered them to the man. Goldcoaster Not only did they not have the wheel, they had not the written word or mathematics (obviously) either. Goldcoaster Traded what? Sub saharan africa produced nothing!

They were sitting on gold and diamond wealth untold, and had nary a clue. They did have slaves, though, which they had been taking since way before the white man got there. Luca “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.” – Arthur Schopenhauer. I wonder if I will live to see the day when race realism and the ills of the current immigration hell are accepted as self-evident? Geo1metric Well, how old are you? DailyKenn I visited London in 1973 with a college tour group and was surprised to see a black vendor selling ice cream. He was the only non-white person I saw the entire week. Geo1metric But he has had thirty-five children since then. LHathaway This is what great ‘racists’ of the past did. The foresaw whites as being in danger. They weren’t over-confident, they didn’t see non-whites as inferior, indeed, they were afraid of them. A bit of humility goes a long way. Enoch was right. Simply read his speech and the sentiments it contained.

Even the simple numbers, which were condemned as ‘inflamatory’ and unrealistic, turned out to be right. Philo Vaihinger “This is what great ‘racists’ of the past did. The foresaw whites as being in danger. ” And thus you put the best reason for repeal of Hart-Celler and a regime of immigration of euro-whites, aimed at maintaining and strengthening the white majority in the US, today. Not that even the Republicans would have the nerve to openly support such a policy, for such reasons. (I’m a Democrat, myself.) As for EP, quite an impressive fellow. Ace Is there any chance you might vote against the Democrats? The Republicans are bad but why not help undercut the worst of the immigration zealots? If you won’t vote against Democrats, I’m curious why. Why would you would not vote against wide open immigration, surely the most important issue there is for any Western nation? Philo Vaihinger Nope. Food on the table is more important. Medical care is more important. I am 65 and will soon retire, and though I have a small nest-egg I will need Social Security and Medicare.

For the current crop of neoliberals, Randians, Wall Street plutocrats, and Liberarians who control the GOP, priority one is destroying all traces of the achievements of 20th Century progressivism. And these are the same people who want to flood the country with cheap labor and don’t care a fig about race, ethnicity, religion, culture, or any of those things that matter to Main Street, but not Wall Street. When people who don’t want to starve the elderly or let them die of untreated pneumonia again take control of the GOP I will gladly resume voting for Republicans. Full disclosure. I voted for Nixon, Dole, and Bush the Younger. But I’ll never do it again so long as the GOP priority 1 is starving me and my wife to death. Can you blame me? Jon He saw the writing on the wall and was betrayed by those in power but the Death of Western civilization was WWI and WWII because both were the same war just with deadlier weapons. What happened in Britain also happened here in the US because we were betrayed by the people in power.

3rd world people are consuming the nations we built and soon nothing will be left and it might take longer than a Generation to see the dmg but it is coming. He also talked about Britain declaring war on Germany proving that Germany did not want war with Britain and France as well as the USA. Our best men were killed in both wars but Britain and Europe got the worst of it. Anon Enoch Powell’s primary mistake was in not identifying the jew as the primary source of the problem. Under the euphemism, communism and using more than a little bit of bribery, brainwashing and criminal retaliation against those who opposed them, they split white people….first by ethnicity, then by class and finally, the morally strong against the morally weak…..pitting these groups against each other in petty conflicts that distracted them from the real enemies that threatened them all. Spite has been their primary weapon. By fostering ill will between those who work vs those who think and organize, it was easy to convince the latter that they should reject “racism….a made up construct” for no other reason than to separate themselves from those dirty handed scoundrels that embraced it (since they were the primary victims of other races and always have been).

After all, did they not fight the “evil” germans who embraced racial solidarity? And why exactly was it necessary to fight them. And never mind what the Russians did. All these things take on VERY different meanings if you make everyone aware that a hostile, non-white, race is purposefully fomenting all this. No….working class people and the elite do not have any significant differences of opinion…they are both white. And both are the victims of jewish genocide. The divide is artificial…a manipulation. Powell did not make that clear. It was not enough to be right about the issue. He failed to point out that those who disagreed with him were victims of manipulation and all of them were being attacked with a divide and conquer strategy. Had he done that, the result might have been different. Might have….because the time to point such out was before the first world war. Not after generations of successful brainwashing in “holier than thou” nonsense. loyalwhitebriton I suspect that we had the moral arrogance and cultural chauvanism that the US seems to display today.

I think the British Empire is over-egged anyway, we promoted self governance in most of our colonies, thus sowing the seeds of our own dissolution. However, I’m not sure any white nation, whether Britain or the US, deserves what’s happening to us today. WR_the_realist The chief advantage of Romenycare is that people could avoid it in 49 out of 50 states. Young Werther A very interesting article about a very interesting man. Nicely written. Thanks. Geo1metric He’s been told this over and over; give up on him. He doesn’t want to learn; he’s pushing his own agenda. Best ignored. JohnEngelman From 1960 to 1980, when the crime rate was tripling, some people said law enforcement agencies were exaggerating the increase in order to get more money appropriated to them. If you refuse to accept statistics compiled by the federal government there is no point in trying to have a rational discussion with you. You believe whatever you want to. VMHB The more I learn about Putin, the more I like him. Mark Hillyard

Question: Which politician, in a famous speech, quoted Euripides, by saying, "Whom the Gods wish to destroy, they first make mad"?
Answer: ENOCH POWELL