The Rods and Cones of the Human Eye Rods and Cones The retina contains two types of photoreceptors, rods and cones. The rods are more numerous, some 120 million, and are more sensitive than the cones. However, they are not sensitive to color. The 6 to 7 million cones provide the eye's color sensitivity and they are much more concentrated in the central yellow spot known as the macula. In the center of that region is the " fovea centralis ", a 0.3 mm diameter rod-free area with very thin, densely packed cones. The experimental evidence suggests that among the cones there are three different types of color reception. Response curves for the three types of cones have been determined. Since the perception of color depends on the firing of these three types of nerve cells, it follows that visible color can be mapped in terms of three numbers called tristimulus values . Color perception has been successfully modeled in terms of tristimulus values and mapped on the CIE chromaticity diagram .

Go Back Cone Details Current understanding is that the 6 to 7 million cones can be divided into "red" cones (64%), "green" cones (32%), and "blue" cones (2%) based on measured response curves . They provide the eye's color sensitivity. The green and red cones are concentrated in the fovea centralis . The "blue" cones have the highest sensitivity and are mostly found outside the fovea, leading to some distinctions in the eye's blue perception . The cones are less sensitive to light than the rods , as shown a typical day-night comparison . The daylight vision (cone vision) adapts much more rapidly to changing light levels, adjusting to a change like coming indoors out of sunlight in a few seconds. Like all neurons, the cones fire to produce an electrical impulse on the nerve fiber and then must reset to fire again. The light adaption is thought to occur by adjusting this reset time. The cones are responsible for all high resolution vision. The eye moves continually to keep the light from the object of interest falling on the fovea centralis where the bulk of the cones reside.

Go Back "Blue" Cone Distinctions The "blue" cones are identified by the peak of their light response curve at about 445 nm. They are unique among the cones in that they constitute only about 2% of the total number and are found outside the fovea centralis where the green and red cones are concentrated. Although they are much more light sensitive than the green and red cones, it is not enough to overcome their disadvantage in numbers. However, the blue sensitivity of our final visual perception is comparable to that of red and green, suggesting that there is a somewhat selective "blue amplifier" somewhere in the visual processing in the brain. The visual perception of intensely blue objects is less distinct than the perception of objects of red and green. This reduced acuity is attributed to two effects. First, the blue cones are outside the fovea, where the close-packed cones give the greatest resolution. All of our most distinct vision comes from focusing the light on the fovea. Second, the refractive index for blue light is enough different from red and green that when they are in focus, the blue is slightly out of focus ( chromatic aberration ).

For an "off the wall" example of this defocusing effect on blue light, try viewing a hologram with a mercury vapor lamp . You will get three images with the dominant green, orange and blue lines of mercury, but the blue image looks less focused than the other two. Go Back Rod Details The rods are the most numerous of the photoreceptors , some 120 million, and are the more sensitive than the cones . However, they are not sensitive to color. They are responsible for our dark-adapted, or scotopic , vision. The rods are incredibly efficient photoreceptors. More than one thousand times as sensitive as the cones, they can reportedly be triggered by individual photons under optimal conditions. The optimum dark-adapted vision is obtained only after a considerable period of darkness, say 30 minutes or longer, because the rod adaption process is much slower than that of the cones. The rod sensitivity is shifted toward shorter wavelengths compared to daylight vision, accounting for the growing apparent brightness of green leaves in twilight. While the visual acuity or visual resolution is much better with the cones, the rods are better motion sensors.

Since the rods predominate in the peripheral vision, that peripheral vision is more light sensitive, enabling you to see dimmer objects in your peripheral vision. If you see a dim star in your peripheral vision, it may disappear when you look at it directly since you are then moving the image onto the cone-rich fovea region which is less light sensitive. You can detect motion better with your peripheral vision, since it is primarily rod vision. The rods employ a sensitive photopigment called rhodopsin. Go Back Rods Do Not See Red! The light response of the rods peaks sharply in the blue; they respond very little to red light. This leads to some interesting phenomena: Red rose at twilight: In bright light, the color-sensitive cones are predominant and we see a brilliant red rose with somewhat more subdued green leaves. But at twilight, the less-sensitive cones begin to shut down for the night, and most of the vision comes from the rods. The rods pick up the green from the leaves much more strongly than the red from the petals, so the green leaves become brighter than the red petals! The ship captain has red instrument lights.

Since the rods do not respond to red, the captain can gain full dark-adapted vision with the rods with which to watch for icebergs and other obstacles outside. It would be undesirable to examine anything with white light even for a moment, because the attainment of optimum night-vision may take up to a half-hour. Red lights do not spoil it. These phenomena arise from the nature of the rod-dominated dark-adapted vision, called scotopic vision . BBC Science & Nature - Human Body and Mind - Nervous System Layer Retina: Part of your eye where light rays are turned into images Rods: Photoreceptors detecting shades of grey when it's dark Cones: Photoreceptors detecting colours 3D vision: The result of your brain merging the two images captured by your eyes In your eyes Your eyes are your organs of sight. In order to see, however, you also need your optic nerves to transmit nerve impulse to your brain, which then adjusts and interprets the images of the world surrounding you. Your eyes are hollow fluid-filled spheres.

Their walls are made up of three different layers, or coats: Outside is your white sclera, which has a transparent window at the front of your eye called the cornea In the middle is a coat containing your coloured iris Inside, at the back of your eye, is your retina, where light rays are turned into images Light-sensitive retina Your retina contains millions of receptor cells. They respond to light entering your eye, which is why they are called photoreceptors. Your photoreceptors contain visual pigments. When light strikes these pigments, they briefly lose their colour. This bleaching process triggers nerve impulses, which are transmitted to your brain via your optic nerve. Your optic nerve runs out of the back of your eye. It originates in an area of your retina called the optic disc, where your have no photoreceptors. This part of your retina is commonly known as your 'blind spot'. You have two types of photoreceptor cells: rods and cones Grey vision and movement Your rods detect colours in shades of grey and they can sense shape and movement. You have about 120 million rods. They are densest at the edge of your retina and don't need a lot of light to work. So you use them in dim light.

Colour vision Your cones see colours. You have three different types of cone, each of which contains a pigment that responds to a different wavelength of light - green, red or blue. If your brain receives impulses from more than one type of cone at the same time, you see mixed colours. You have around 7 million cones. They are densest at the centre of your retina and need bright light to function. This is why, when it's dark, you can only detect shades of grey. Secrets of your lens Before light rays touch your retina, they travel through a disc-shaped lens. Your lens bends light rays to focus them exactly on your retina. Muscles in your eye can change the shape of your lens, thereby adjusting its light-bending power. This allows you to focus on different objects. By focussing images on your retina, your lens turns them upside down. So, for you to see properly, your brain has to turn them the right way up again. Your brain also needs to merge the two slightly different images captured by each of your eyes into one. By doing so, your brain creates a 3D picture. How Do We See Light?

| ASU - Ask A Biologist Ask A Biologist Rods and Cones show/hide words to know Cornea: is the clear outer surface of the eye the covers the iris, pupil, and the outer chamber of the eye... more Epithelium: the layer of cells found lining the surface of most surfaces of the body. Epithelium is one of four types of tissues found in human body. The other tissues are connective, muscle, and nervous tissue... more Fovea: the part of the eye that provides sharp images used for activities like reading, riding a bicycle, and driving. It is located at the back of the eye and has the highest density of cones... more Iris: in the anatomy of an eye, the iris controls the size of the opening of the pupil. This in turn controls the amount of light that can enter the eye.... more Mitochondria: are the cell’s powerhouse. It packages the energy from food into energy the cell can use to do work... more Nucleus: where DNA stays in the cell, plural is nuclei. Photoreceptor: the special type of cell in your eye that picks up photons and then signals the brain.

They are located in the retina (a layer at the back of the eye). There are two types, rods and cones. Pupil: is the hole that allow light to enter the eye. In humans it is round, but other animals like cats and goats the pupil is shaped more like a slit... more Regeneration: to make something new that was old, damaged, or used... more Rods and cones of the human eye You can see in the drawing on the left that the back of the eye is lined with a thin layer called the retina. This is where the photoreceptors are located. If you think of the eye as a camera, the retina would be the film. The retina also contains the nerves that tell the brain what the photoreceptors are "seeing." There are two types of photoreceptors involved in sight: rods and cones. Rods work at very low levels of light. We use these for night vision because only a few bits of light (photons) can activate a rod. Rods don't help with color vision, which is why at night, we see everything in a gray scale. The human eye has over 100 million rod cells.

Cones require a lot more light and they are used to see color. We have three types of cones: blue, green, and red. The human eye only has about 6 million cones. Many of these are packed into the fovea, a small pit in the back of the eye that helps with the sharpness or detail of images. Other animals have different numbers of each cell type. Animals that have to see in the dark have many more rods than humans have. Take a close look at the photoreceptors in the drawings above and below. The disks in the outer segments (to the right) are where photoreceptor proteins are held and light is absorbed. Rods have a protein called rhodopsin and cones have photopsins. But wait...these are stuck in the back of the retina. That means that the light is absorbed closer to the outside of the eye. Aren't these set up backwards? What is going on here? The "backwards" organization of rods and cones is helpful for a few different reasons. First of all, the discs containing rhodopsin or photopsin are constantly recycled to keep your visual system healthy.

By having the discs right next to the epithelial cells (retinal pigmented epithelium: RPE) at the back of the eye, parts of the old discs can be carried away by cells in the RPE. Another benefit to this layout is that the RPE can absorb scattered light. This means that your vision is a lot clearer. Light can also have damaging effects, so this set up also helps protect your rods and cones from unnecessary damage. While there are many other reasons having the discs close to the RPE is helpful, we will only mention one more. Think about someone who is running a marathon. In order to keep muscles in the body working, the runner needs to eat special nutrients or molecules during the race. Rods and cones are similar, but instead of running, they are constantly sending signals. This requires the movement of lots of molecules, which they need to replenish to keep working. Because the RPE is right next to the discs, it can easily help reload photoreceptor cells and discs with the molecules they need to keep sending signals. Now that we know how these photoreceptor cells work, how do we use them to see different colors? We have three types of cones.

If you look at the graph below, you can see each cone is able to detect a range of colors. Even though each cone is most sensitive to a specific color of light (where the line peaks), they also can detect other colors (shown by the stretch of each curve). Since the three types of cones are commonly labeled by the color at which they are most sensitive (blue, green and red) you might think other colors are not possible. But it is the overlap of the cones and how the brain integrates the signals sent from them that allows us to see millions of colors. For example, the color yellow results from green and red cones being stimulated while the blue cones have no stimulation. How do we see the color white? Our eyes are detectors. Cones that are stimulated by light send signals to the brain. The brain is the actual interpreter of color. When all the cones are stimulated equally the brain perceives the color as white. We also perceive the color white when our rods are stimulated. Unlike cones, rods are able to detect light at a much lower level. This is why we see only black and white in dimly lighted rooms or while out viewing a star-filled night sky. Are carrots good for your eyes?

Let's take a minute to talk about vitamins. The pigment molecule attached to the proteins in photoreceptors is called retinal. When retinal absorbs photons, it gets destroyed in the process. In order to regenerate more retinal, your body needs Vitamin A . Carrots are one food that is high in Vitamin A. This makes them good for your eyes, but don't think they will make your eyesight better. While carrots are good for the health of your eyes, they won't make you see better or let you ditch your glasses or stop wearing your contact lenses. Images: Eye anatomy illustration from Beginning Psychology (v. 1.0) via Creative Commons (by-nc-sa 3.0). Labels modified for this page. Additional images via Wikimedia Commons Photoreceptors by Helga Kolb – Webvision Helga Kolb Two or three types of cone photoreceptor and a single type of rod photoreceptor are present in the normal mammalian retina. Some non-mammalian retinas have even more cone types (see later). 1. Light microscopy and ultrastructure of rods and cones. In vertical sections of retina prepared for light microscopy with the rods and cones nicely aligned, the rods and cones can be distinguished rather easily.

Fig1b. Scanning electron micrograph of the rods and cones of the primate retina Cones are robust conical-shaped structures that have their cell bodies situated in a single row right below the outer limiting membrane (OLM) and their inner and outer segments protruding into the subretinal space towards the pigment epithelium (Figs. 1 and 2). In foveal retina, where only cones are concentrated, their cell bodies are layered in oblique columns below the outer limiting membrane. Rods, on the other hand, are slim rod-shaped structures with their inner and outer segments filling the area between the larger cones in the subretinal space and stretching to the pigment epithelium cells. Rod cell bodies make up the remainder of the outer nuclear layer below the cone cell bodies. Apical processes from the pigment epithelium envelope the outer segments of both rods and cones (not always clear in histological sections). The higher magnification afforded by the electron microscope allows better resolution of rod and cone photoreceptors. Fig. 3. High magnification EM images of cone and rod outer segments in the ground squirrel retina Ultrathin sections viewed in an electron microscope (Figs.

2 and 3) show rods and cones from human and squirrel retinas (Anderson and Fisher, 1976). The photoreceptor consists of 1) an outer segment, filled with stacks of membranes (like a stack of poker chips) containing the visual pigment molecules such as rhodopsins, 2) an inner segment containing mitochondria, ribosomes and membranes where opsin molecules are assembled and passed to be part of the outer segment discs, 3) a cell body containing the nucleus of the photoreceptor cell and 4) a synaptic terminal where neurotransmission to second order neurons occurs. CLICK HERE to see a photoreceptor with emphasis on the inner and outer segments and the disc structures within the outer segment. Movie made by Carlos Rozas (CanalWeb, Chile). Quicktime movie. Outer and inner segments of rods (i.s.) are generally thinner than those of cones in mammalian retinas. For example, the rod inner segments are 2 microns and the cone’s about 6 microns in diameter in peripheral human retina.

In the fovea, however, where there are only cone photoreceptors, the most central cones are even thinner than the average rod at about 1.5 microns diameter. Inner segment regions of both rods and cones are filled with long thin mitochondria. At the top of the inner segment a thin cilium joins the inner and outer segments of the rods and cones (Fig. 3 and see movie). 2. Outer segment generation. It is from the base of the cilium that membrane evaginations and invaginations occur to produce the outer segment (o.s.) or the important visual pigment-bearing portion of the photoreceptor. Outer segments of both the rods and cones arises from outpouching (a, Fig. 5 below) of the photoreceptor cell plasma membrane at this point (see below) (Steinberg et al., 1980). (Quicktime movie) These expanding membrane plates (b-c, Fig. 5 above) become detached as free floating discs inside the outer segment membrane in the case of the rods. In the case of the cones though, the outer segment discs remain attached to the outer segment membrane.

So the outer segment is a structure filled entirely with discs of folded double membranes in which are embedded the light sensitive visual pigment molecules (Fig. 6). Fig. 6. Drawing of rod outer segment discs The opsin molecule, which binds the chromophore 11-cis retinal to form the visual pigment, is manufactured in the Golgi apparatus of the inner segment and presented to the outer membrane at the cilium, via fusion areas using G-proteins (Papermaster et al., 1985; Deretic and Papermaster, 1995). Fig. 7. Retinal binding proteins In contrast, the other part of the visual pigment molecule in the outer segment discs which is retinal (vitamin A product), is provided to the discs from the pigment epithelium via carrier molecules (retinal binding proteins, IRBP) in the interphotoreceptor matrix of the subretinal space (Fig. 7) (Adler and Martin, 1982; Chader, 1989) and see chapter on retinal pigment epithelium by Olaf Strauss. 3. Visual pigments and visual transduction.

Vertebrate photoreceptors can respond to light by virtue of their containing a visual pigment embedded in the bilipid membranous discs that make up the outer segment. The visual pigment consists of a protein called opsin and a chromophore derived from vitamin A known as retinal. The vitamin A is manufactured from beta-carotene in the food we eat, and the protein is manufactured in the photoreceptor cell (see above). The opsin and the chromophore are bound together and lie buried in the membranes of the outer segment discs (Fig. 8). Fig. 9. Structural model of Rhodopsin showing seven transmembrane components and the attachment site for retinal About 50% of the opsin is within the bilipid membrane connected by short protein loops outside. Each molecule of rhodopsin consists of seven of these transmembrane portions surrounding the chromophore (11-cis retinal) in the lipid bilayer (Fig. 9). The chromophore apparently lies horizontally in the membrane and is bound at a lysine residue to helix seven (Hargrave et al. 1984, Hargrave and McDowell, 1992)(Fig.

9). Each outer segment disc, of course, contains many (thousands) visual pigment molecules. Upon absorption of a photon of light, the retinal isomerizes from the 11-cis form to an all-trans form which starts conformational changes in the molecule resulting in bleaching. Several intermediaries are formed in bleaching among them metarhodopsin II which activates the G-protein transducin and a further cascade of events summarized below (see review by Hargrave and McDowell (1992) and by Archer, 1995)and chapter by Yingbin Fu (webvision). Light transduces the visual pigment via the following enzyme cascade: photons – rhodopsin – activated rhodopsin (metarhodopsin II) – a GTP binding protein (transducin) – an enzyme hydrolyzing cGMP (cGMP-phosphodiesterase) – closes a membrane bound cGMP-gated cation channel. In the dark a steady current flows into the open channels, carried mainly by Na ions, constituting a “dark current” that partially depolarizes the photoreceptor cell (Fig. 10).

Thus, the depolarized photoreceptor releases neurotransmitter (the amino acid glutamate) from its synaptic terminals upon second-order neurons in the dark. On light stimulation the rhodopsin molecules are isomerized to the active form, the above cascade ensues, leading to closure of the cation channels of the photoreceptor membrane, stopping the dark current and causing the photoreceptor cell membrane to hyperpolarize and cease neurotransmitter release to second-order neurons (Fig. 10) (see Stryer, 1991; Yau, 1994, and Kawamura, 1995, and Fu (webvision) for reviews). Click here to see an animation of phototransduction (Quicktime movie) The “dark current” is composed mainly of the influx of the Na+ component (80%) however, a Ca2+ component (15%) and a Mg2+ component (5%) are also present (Yau, 1994).

In darkness there must be a mechanism to remove Ca2+ as well as the excess Na+, and it is thought to be done so through a sodium/calcium exchanger in the membranes of the outer segment of the photoreceptor. Ca2+, once thought to be the second messenger in linking the rhodopsin photoisomerization to the membrane events is now known to have a secondary but important regulatory role in phototransduction. Although it does not directly participate in the transduction cascade it does improve the signalling capability of the rods in speeding the recovery after illumination and down regulating of the rods sensitivity in steady illumination (Yau, 1994). The latter effect is a mechanism for light adaptation. For it must be remembered that a photoreceptor cell does not simply detect light. It can also adapt to environmental light. For example cone photoreceptors can adapt so that our visual system can see from the dim shadows under a tree to objects in bright sunlight snow, a shift of light intensity of 7-9 log units of light intensity (Normann et al., 1991).

Rod photoreceptors, thought at one time not to light adapt, are now known to adapt over a range of 2 log units of background intensity and combined with a network adaptation through the whole visual system, allows as much as 5 log units of background intensity adaptation in rod driven vision (Yau, 1994). 4. Phagocytosis of outer segments by pigment epithelium. The stacks of discs containing visual pigment molecules in the outer segments of the photoreceptors are constantly renewed. New discs are added at the base of the outer segment at the cilium as discussed above. At the same time old discs are displaced up the outer segment and are pinched off at the tips and engulfed by the apical processes of the pigment epithelium (Figs. 11 and 12). These discarded, spent discs become known as phagosomes in the pigment epithelial cells. They are then broken down by lysis. Photoreceptor outer segment discs are phagocytosed by the pigment epithelium in a diurnal cycle.

There is a burst of disc shedding at light on in the morning, judged by increased numbers of phagosomes in the pigment epithelium shortly thereafter (Young 1971). Fig. 12. Diagrammatic representation of disc shedding and phagosome formation in the pigment epithelial cell Cone outer segments differ from rod outer segments in several respects. Firstly, they are shorter and more conical with a wider base and tapering shape compared with those of rods. Secondly, as mentioned above, their discs are connected to the plasma membrane throughout the extent of the outer segment, and thus they are open to extracellular space. Apical processes of the pigment epithelium phagocytize chunks of cone outer segments, just like they do the rod outer segments, but at a different time in the diurnal cycle compared with rods i.e. at light off-set compared light-onset (see original work by Young, 1971, 1976; LaVail, 1976; Steinberg et al., 1977; reviewed by Besharse, 1982). Fig. 13.

Photoreceptor types As we have seen from the morphological appearances described above, two basic types of photoreceptor, rods and cones, exist in the vertebrate retina (Fig. 13). The rods are photoreceptors that contain the visual pigment – rhodopsin and are sensitive to blue-green light with a peak sensitivity around 500 nanometers (nm) wavelength of light (Fig. 14a). Rods are highly sensitive photoreceptors and are used for vision under dark-dim conditions at night. Cones contain cone opsins as their visual pigments and, depending on the exact structure of the opsin molecule, are maximally sensitive to either long wavelengths of light (red light), medium wavelengths of light (green light) or short wavelengths of light (blue light). Cones of different wavelength sensitivity and the consequent pathways of connectivity to the brain are, of course, the basis of color perception in our visual image. Fig. 14a. Light spectra Three different cone mechanisms can be detected in behavioral, psychophysical, physiological and molecular staining in primate retinas (Fig. 14a). This 3-cone mechanism is the basis of so called trichromatic vision which most humans have.

Thus, long wavelength sensitive, L-cones (red) are known to be maximally sensitive to wavelengths peaking around 560nm, medium wavelength sensitive, M-cones (green) peak around 530nm and short wavelength cones, S-cones (blue) peak at 420nm respectively (Fig. 14a) (Bowmaker and Dartnell, 1980; Bowmaker et al., 1980, and see chapter on color vision in webvision). Other authors have a different result for the peak sensitivity of the blue cones, or S-cones, with peaks varying from 430nm (Baylor et al., 1987) to 445nm (Dobelle, Marks and MacNichol 1969). Most mammalian species are dichromatic containing as well as rods only middle and short wavelength sensitive cones in their retinas. Primates and humans, birds, reptiles and fish are trichromatic, tetrachromatic and some even pentachromatic (the latter three vertebrate phyla). Normal human color vision depends on these three cone mechanisms.

This adds an added dimension to color vision over that of mammals which are mostly dichromatic. Dichromats have just long wavelength (red) and short wavelength (blue) cones. In primates and humans, nature has split the long-wave system into two systems with slightly different spectral sensitivities. The blue cones are like those found in dichromatic mammals. Fig. 14b shows the subtle difference in the molecular structure of the red, green and blue cone photopigments compared with the rhodopsin rod pigment (different molecules are colored pink (Nathans et al., 1986).Figure 14b shows the subtle difference in the molecular structure of the red and green cone photopigments compared with the rhodopsin rod pigment (Nathans et al., 1986). Figure 14b shows the subtle difference in the molecular structure of the red and green cone photopigments compared with the rhodopsin rod pigment (Nathans et al., 1986). Fig. 14b. The closely related molecular structure of the cone opsins. The blue-cone opsin compared with rhodopsin.

The blue-cone opsin compared with the green opsin and the minimal difference between the red- and green-cone opsins. The pink-filled circles represent amino acid substitutions between these molecules. The open circles indicate identical amino acids. Adapted from Nathans et al. (1986) To understand color vision and how the colored visual message is processed in the retina we need to be able to start with a morphological distinction of the three (or more) cone types, so they can then, hopefully be identified with any color specific connections they make, i.e. connections to bipolar, horizontal cell and finally ganglion cells of the retina. Fortunately, certain vertebrate species have distinctly different morphological cone types in their retinas and it has recently become possible to correlate these morphologies with spectral sensitivity. Now we can distinguish short, medium and long wavelength cones in retinas of some fish, frogs, birds, and reptiles (turtles) based on distinct morphological differences. Turtle retinas for example have colored oil droplets in their different spectral types of cone which identify them rather readily (Figs.

15 and 16) (see reviews by Kolb and Lipetz, 1991 and Ammermüller and Kolb, 1996). Fig. 16. Diagrammatic representation of turtle photoreceptors and their associated oil droplets. UV, UV cone; B, blue cone; DC, double cone; G, green cone; R, red cone; Rod, rod (no oil droplet). However, primate and human retinas still contain cone types which look essentially the same morphologically, but here too with the latest anatomical techniques we are beginning to be able to see at least a difference between the short wavelength cone and the two longer wavelength cones. Specialized histochemical techniques (Marc and Sperling, 1977), dye uptake studies (DeMonasterio et al., 1981) or use of antibodies specific for visual pigments (Szel et al., 1988) have allowed identification of the different spectral types of cone in most mammalian species now. In primate retina antibodies against visual pigments stain outer segments of the L/M-cones together or the S-cones only. Fig. 17.

Primate cone mosaic In Figure 17 in anti-visual pigment antibody stained tissue, the S-cones stand out as the cones that are not stained because the antibody recognizes only L- and M-cone visual pigment. i.e. the brown stained cone profiles are L- and M-cone types while the unstained profiles surrounded by blue circles are the S-cones (Wikler and Rakic, 1990). Fig. 18. Vertical section of Human S-cone Recently, careful morphological studies have enabled us to distinguish the short wavelength specific (blue) cone from the medium and long wavelength specific cones in the human retina even without special antibody staining techniques (Ahnelt et al., 1987). Thus, we now know that S-cones have longer inner segments that project further into subretinal space than longer wavelength cones (Fig 18). Their inner segment diameters do not vary much across the entire retina, thus they are fatter in the foveal area but thinner in the peripheral retina than longer wavelength cones. The S-cones also have smaller and morphologically different pedicles than the other two wavelength cones (Ahnelt et al., 1990).

Furthermore, throughout the retina, the S-cones have a different distribution and do not fit into the regular hexagonal mosaic of cones typical of the other two types. Fig. 19. S-cones in foveal cone mosaic This is illustrated in the tangential section of the foveal cone mosaic (Fig. 19) where the hexagonal packing is distorted in many places by a larger-diameter cone (arrowed cones) breaking up the perfect mosaic into irregular subunits. The larger-diameter cones are S-cones. These cones have their lowest density in the foveal pit at 3-5% of the cones, reach a maximum density of 15% on the foveal slope (1 degree from the foveal pit) and then form an even 8% of the total population elsewhere in the retina (Ahnelt et al., 1987). Analogous information concerning relative distributions of the M- and L-cones in the human retina are not easily available because we cannot tell them apart by morphological features or even by anti-visual pigment staining.

In the monkey retina, Marc and Sperling (1977), performed a colored light-dependent histochemical staining technique on freshly excised monkey eyes. They found that L-cones (red) occur at about 33% of the cones throughout the retina, while M-cones (green) peak in the fovea at 64% and vary between 52% and 59% elsewhere in the retina. However, others have found the L-cones to outnumber the M-cones in fovea and perifoveal psychophysical testing paradigms (Cicerone and Nerger, 1989). The latest laser inferometry techniques (Roorda and Williams, 1999, Hofer et al. 2005), measuring the distribution of the red and green cones in the living human fovea, show there to be considerable variation amongst individuals. Some have an equal distribution of L- and M-cones, but others have a larger number of red cones even up to the ratio of 16 L-cones:1 M-cones.

Both Roorda and Williams and Hofer et al’s (1999, 2005) data in human and Mollon and Bowmaker (1992) in monkey fovea show an irregular and patchwork nature of the L- and M-cone distribution (see chapter on midget pathways, Figure 5). 7. Densities of rods and cones in the human retina. It is important for our understanding of the organization of the visual connections for us to know the spatial distribution of the different cell types in the retina. Photoreceptors, we know, are organized in a fairly exact mosaic. As we saw in the fovea, the mosaic is a hexagonal packing of cones. Outside the fovea, the rods break up the close hexagonal packing of the cones but still allow an organized architecture with cones rather evenly spaced surrounded by rings of rods. Thus in terms of densities of the different photoreceptor populations in the human retina, it is clear that the cone density is highest in the foveal pit and falls rapidly outside the fovea to a fairly even density into the peripheral retina (Figs.

20 and 21) (Osterberg, 1935; Curcio et al., 1987). There is a peak of the rod photoreceptors in a ring around the fovea at about 4.5 mm or 18 degrees from the foveal pit. The optic nerve (blind spot) is of course photoreceptor free (see below). 8. Rods and Night Vision. Rods convey the ability to see at night, under conditions of very dim illumination. Animals with high densities of rods tend to be nocturnal, whereas those with mainly cones tend to be diurnal. The nature of dim light is important both to physicists and to biologists. In 1905 Einstein proposed that light propagated only in discrete irreducible packets or quanta (Einstein, 1905). This explained the non-classical features of the ‘photoelectric effect’, a process by which light releases electrons from metal surfaces, described by Heinrich Hertz in 1887 (Hertz, 1887). Rods are so sensitive that they actually detect single quanta of light, much as do the most sensitive of physical instruments.

In 1942 Selig Hecht argued that human rods must be capable of detecting individual light quanta because light flashes so dim that only 1 in 100 rods were likely to absorb a quantum were yet reliably seen by careful observers (Hecht, 1942). A century after the original discovery of the photoelectric effect it has become possible to record directly the minute electrical voltages in rods induced by absorption of individual light quanta. An excellent example is shown in the suction electrode recordings of monkey rods by Schneeweis and Schnapf (1995) (Fig. 22). Each dot in the figure below represents delivery of a very dim pulse of light containing only a few quanta. Voltage responses appear to come in 3 sizes: none, small, and large, representing the detection of 0, 1 or 2 quanta in each flash. The granularity of response to dim light stimuli is evident. Fig. 22. Photovoltages recorded in monkey rods Rod sensitivity appears to be bought at a price, however, since rods are much slower to respond to light stimulation than cones. This is one reason why sporting events such as baseball become progressively more difficult as daylight fails.

Both electrical recordings and human observations suggest that signals from rods may arrive as much as 1/10 second later than those from cones under lighting conditions where both can be simultaneously activated (MacLeod, 1972). 9. Ultrastructure of rod and cone synaptic endings. The job of the photoreceptor cell in the retina is to catch quanta of light in the visual pigment-containing membranes of the outer segment and pass a message, concerning numbers of quanta of light and sensitivities to the different wavelengths, to the next stage of integration and processing at the outer plexiform layer (see Phototransduction ). Fig. 23b. Reconstruction from EM of a cone pedicle (center) surrounded by rod spherules. Courtesy of Holger Jastrow, University of Mainz, Germany The information transmitting end of the cone cell is known as the pedicle and of the rod cell as the spherule. Cone pedicles are large, conical, flat end-feet (8-10 µm diameter) of the cone axon that lie more or less side by side on the same plane at the outer edge of the outer plexiform layer (OPL)(Figs. 23a and b).

The more numerous rod spherules, in contrast, are small round enlargements of the axon (3-5 µm diameter) or even extensions of the cell body. They lie packed between and above the cone pedicles (Fig. 23a and b). Both photoreceptor types’ synaptic endings are filled with synaptic vesicles. At their synapses to second-order neurons (bipolar and horizontal cells), both rod spherules and cone pedicles exhibit dense structures known as synaptic ribbons pointing to the postsynaptic invaginated processes (asterisks in Fig. 24). In the cone pedicle approximately 30 of these ribbons occur and are associated with 30 “triads” of invaginated processes (Ahnelt et al., 1990). In the rod spherule 2 ribbons are associated with 4 invaginated second-order neurites while the cone pedicle delivers information to over a hundred second-order neurons (Fig. 23b). Fig. 25.

EM rod spherule The cone “triad” of invaginated second-order processes consists typically of a central element which is a dendritic terminal of an invaginating bipolar cell (IBC), and two lateral elements which are dendritic terminals of horizontal cells (HC) (Figs. 24 and 27). In addition, other varieties of bipolar cell have dendrites making synaptic contacts on the under surface of the cone pedicle at what were first called flat contacts (FBC) (Missotten, 1965; Dowling and Boycott, 1966; Kolb, 1970) (Fig. 27), but then were better characterized and defined by Lasansky (1971) as basal junctions (Fig. 26). Fig. 27. Cone triad Rods spherules have only two synaptic ribbons associated with two lateral elements that are horizontal cell axon terminals (HC) and two central invaginating dendrites of rod bipolar cells (rb) (Missotten, 1965; Dowling and Boycott, 1966; Kolb, 1970).

There are no basal junctions on rod spherules. Fig. 28. Rod triad 10. Interphotoreceptor contacts at gap junctions. There also appears to be a pathway for crosstalk between cones and cones and cones and rods in the human retina. Cone pedicles have small projections from their sides or bases that pass to neighboring rod spherules and cone pedicles. Where these projections, called telodendria, meet they have a specialized junction known to be typical of electrical synaptic transmission. These are minute gap junctions (Fig. 29) (Raviola and Gilula, 1975; Nelson et al., 1985). Fig. 29. Gap junctions between photoreceptors As many as 3-5 gap junctions occur on a single rod spherule from neighboring cone telodendria, and a single cone pedicle can have as many as 10 contacts to neighboring rods.

Pedicles of S-cones do not have as many telodendrial gap junctions with either neighboring rods or cones (Ahnelt et al., 1990) and thus, this cone type remains relatively isolated in the cone mosaic, and, as we shall see later, remains isolated to the ganglion cell level too, due to connections with a specific ‘S-cone bipolar cell. Direct interactions between different functional classes of photoreceptors were not anticipated based on any known or theoretical needs of the visual system. In fact such connections would appear to degrade spatial resolution, and, potentially, color perception by mixing signals from photoreceptors at different locations or with different photopigments. Nonetheless, in agreement with anatomical findings, mammalian cones appear to carry rod signals. The slow wave forms of rod signals are easily distinguished from the rapid wave forms of cone signals in voltage recordings from single cones. Examples of voltage responses from monkey cones are illustrated in Figure 30 (Schneeweis and Schnapf, 1995). Voltage records resulting from balanced red and green stimuli are illustrated. Fig. 30.

Voltage recording from monkey cone Both records exhibit the same initial peak hyperpolarization in response to the brief stimulus, however the green stimulus (solid trace) also evokes a slower hyperpolarizing phase after the initial response which the red stimulus (dotted trace) does not (Fig. 30). This latter electrical wave has the characteristics of a rod signal. Such signals have also been observed in cat cones (Nelson, 1977). One theory of the utility of this arrangement is that it allows rods to utilize neural pathways devoted to both cones and rods in sending visual information to the inner plexiform layer. Cone pathways may be tuned to faster temporal characteristics than rod pathways, and so by utilizing both pathways, rods may transmit a wider bandwidth of temporal information. There is evidence for two rod pathways with different dynamic signatures in perceptual experiments (Sharpe et al, 1989). Although the functional role of interreceptor junctions is still a matter of debate, they perhaps serve as a philosophical warning to studies of biological sensory systems: Not even the receptor cells themselves stand in isolation of the activity and influence of neighboring neurons. 11. References. Adler AJ, Martin KJ.

Retinol-binding in bovine interphotoreceptor matrix. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1982;108:1601–1608. [ PubMed ] Ahnelt PK, Kolb H, Pflug R. Identification of a subtype of cone photoreceptor, likely to be blue sensitive, in the human retina. J Comp Neurol. 1987;255:18–34. [ PubMed ] Ahnelt PK, Keri C, Kolb H. Identification of pedicles of putative blue sensitive cones in human and primate retina. J Comp Neurol. 1990;293:39–53.[ PubMed ] Ammermuller, J. and H. Kolb (1996) Functional architecture of the turtle inner retina. Prog. Ret. & Eye Res. 15 (2), 393-433. Anderson DH, Fisher SK. The photoreceptors of diurnal squirrels: outer segment structure, disc shedding, and protein renewal. J Ultrastruct Res.1976;55:119–141. [ PubMed ] Archer S.

Molecular biology of visual pigments. In: Djamgoz MBA, Archer SN, Vallerga S, editors. Neurobiology and clinical aspects of the outer retina. London: Chapman & Hall; 1995. p. 79-104. Baylor DA, Nunn BJ, Schnapf JL (1987) Spectral sensitivity of cones of the monkey Macaca fascicularis. J Physiol. 390:145-60. [ PubMed ] Besharse JC. The daily light-dark cycle and rythmic metabolism in the photoreceptor-pigment epithelial complex. Prog Ret Res. 1982;1:81–124. Bowmaker JK, Dartnall HJ (1980) Visual pigments of rods and cones in a human retina. J Physiol. 298: 501-11. [ PubMed ] Bowmaker JK, Dartnall HJ, Mollon JD (1980) Microspectrophotometric demonstration of four classes of photoreceptor in an old world primate, Macaca fascicularis. J Physiol.

298: 131-43. [ PubMed ] Chader GJ. Interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein (IRBP): a model protein for molecular biological and clinically relevant studies. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci.1989;30:7–22. [ PubMed ] Cicerone CM, Nerger JL. The relative numbers of long-wavelength-sensitive to middle-wavelength-sensitive cones in the human fovea centralis. Vision Res.1989;29:115–128. [ PubMed ] Curcio CA, Sloan KR, Packer O, Hendrickson AE, Kalina RE. Distribution of cones in human and monkey retina: individual variability and radial asymmetry.Science. 1987;236:579–582. [ PubMed ] DeMonasterio FM, Schein SJ, McCrane EP. Staining of blue sensitive cones of the Macaque retina by fluorescent dye. Science. 1981;213:1278–1281.[ PubMed ] Deretic D, Papermaster DS.

The role of small G-proteins in the transport of newly synthesized rhodopsin. Prog Ret Eye Res. 1995;14:249–265. Dobelle WH, Marks WB, MacNichol EF Jr. (1969) Visual pigment density in single primate foveal cones. Science. 166(3912): 1508-10. [ PubMed ] Dowling JE, Boycott BB. Organization of the primate retina: electron microscopy. Proc R Soc B Lond. 1966;166:80–111. Einstein, A., On a Heuristic Viewpoint Concerning the Production and Transformation of Light. Annalen der Physik 1905. 17(6): p. 132-148. Gouras P. Color vision. Prog Ret Res. 1984;3:227–261. Hargrave PA, McDowell JH, Feldmann RJ, Atkinson PH, Rao JKM, Argos P. Rhodopsin’s protein and carbohydrate structure: selected aspects.

Vision Res.1984;24:1487–1499. [ PubMed ] Hargrave PA, McDowell JH. Rhodopsin and phototransduction. Int Rev Cytol. 1992;137B:49–97. [ PubMed ] Hecht S, Schlaer S, Pirenne MH. Energy, quanta and vision. J Gen Physiol. 1942;25:819–840. [ PubMed ] Hertz, H., Ueber den Einfluss des ultravioletten Lichtes auf die electrische Entladung. Annalen der Physik, 1887. 267(8): p. 983-1000. Hofer H, Carroll J, Neitz J, Neitz M, Williams DR. Organization of the human trichromatic cone mosaic. J Neurosci. 2005;25:9669–9679. [ PubMed ] Jastrow H. Electron microscopic atlas of cells, tissues and organs in the internet. Available from: . Kawamura S.

Photransduction, excitation and adaptation. In: Djamgoz MBA, Archer SN, Vallerga S, editors. Neurobiology and clinical aspects of the outer retina. London: Chapman & Hall; 1995. p. 105-131. Kolb H. Organization of the outer plexiform layer of the primate retina: electron microscopy of Golgi-impregnated cells. Phil Trans R Soc B Lond.1970;258:261–283. Kolb H, Lipetz LE. The anatomical basis for colour vision in the vertebrate retina. In: Gouras P, editor. Vision and visual dysfunction. Vol. 6, The perception of colour. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.; 1991. p. 128-145. Lasansky A. Synaptic organization of cone cells in the turtle retina. Phil Trans R Soc B. 1971;262:365–381. LaVail MM. Rod outer segment disc shedding in rat retina: relationship to cyclic lighting. Science.

1976;194:1071–1074. [ PubMed ] MacLeod DIA. Rods cancel cones in flicker. Nature. 1972;235:173–174. [ PubMed ] Marc RE, Sperling HG. Chromatic organization of primate cones. Science. 1977;196:454–456. [ PubMed ] Missotten L. The ultrastructure of the human retina. Brussels: Arscia Uitgaven N.V.; 1965. Mollon JD, Bowmaker JK. The spatial arrangement of cones in the primate fovea. Nature. 1992;360:677–679. [ PubMed ] Nathans J, Piantanida TP, Eddy RL, Shows TB, Hogness DS. (1986) Molecular genetics of inherited variation in human color vision. Science. 232, 203-10. [ PubMed ] Nelson R. Cat cones have rod input: a comparison of the response properties of cones and horizontal cell bodies in the retina of the cat.

J Comp Neurol.1977;172:109–136. [ PubMed ] Nelson R, Lynn T, Dickinson-Nelson A, Kolb, H. Spectral mechanisms in cat horizontal cells. In: Gallego A, Gouras P, editors. Neurocircuitry of the retina: a Cajal memorial. 1985; p. 109-121. Normann RA, Perlman I, Hallet PE. Cone photoreceptor physiology and cone contributions to colour vision. In: Gouras P, editor. Vision and visual dysfunction. Vol. 6, The perception of colour. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.; 1991. p. 146-162. Osterberg G. Topography of the layer of rods and cones in the human retina. Acta Ophthal Suppl. 1935;6:1–103. Papermaster DS, Schneider BG, Besharse JC. Vesicular transport of newly synthesized opsin from the Golgi apparatus toward the rod outer segment. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci.

1985;26:1386–1404. [ PubMed ] Raviola E, Gilula NB. Intramembrane organization of specialized contacts in the outer plexiform layer of the retina: a freeze-fracture study in monkeys and rabbits. J Cell Biol. 1975;65:192–222. [ PubMed ] Roorda A, Williams DR. The arrangement of the three cone classes in the living human eye. Nature. 1999;397:520–522. [ PubMed ] Schneeweis DM, Schnapf JL. Photovoltage of rods and cones in the macaque retina. Science. 1995;268:1053–1055. [ PubMed ] Sharpe LT, Stockman A, MacLeod DIA. Rod flicker perception: scotopic duality, phase lags and destructive interference. Vision Res. 1989;29:1539–1559.[ PubMed ] Steinberg RH, Wood I, Hogan MJ.

Pigment epithelial ensheathment and phagocytosis of extra foveal cones in the human retina. Phil Trans R Soc B.1977;277:459–474. [ PubMed ] Steinberg RH, Fisher SK, Anderson DH. Disc morphogenesis in vertebrate photoreceptors. J Comp Neurol. 1980;190:501–518. [ PubMed ] Stryer L. Visual excitation and recovery. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:10711–24. [ PubMed ] Szel A, Diamanstein T, Rohlich P. Identification of blue-sensitive cones in the mammalian retina by antivisual pigment antibody. J Comp Neurol.1988;273:593–602. [ PubMed ] Wikler KC, Rakic P. Distribution of photoreceptor subtypes in the retina of diurnal and nocturnal primates. J Neurosci. 1990;10:3390–3401. [ PubMed ] Yau K-W.

Phototransduction mechanisms in retinal rods and cones. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci. 1994;35:9–32. [ PubMed ] Young RW. The renewal of rod and cone outer segments in the rhesus monkey. J Cell Biol. 1971;49:303–318. [ PubMed ] Young RW. Visual cells and the concept of renewal. Invest Ophthalmol. 1976;15:700–725. Rods & Cones Rods & Cones There are two types of photoreceptors in the human retina, rods and cones. Rods are responsible for vision at low light levels (scotopic vision). They do not mediate color vision, and have a low spatial acuity. Cones are active at higher light levels (photopic vision), are capable of color vision and are responsible for high spatial acuity. The central fovea is populated exclusively by cones. There are 3 types of cones which we will refer to as the short-wavelength sensitive cones, the middle-wavelength sensitive cones and the long-wavelength sensitive cones or S-cone, M-cones, and L-cones for short.

The light levels where both are operational are called mesopic. The bottom figure shows the distribution of rods and cones in the retina. This data was prepared from histological sections made on human eyes. In the top figure, you can relate visual angle to the position on the retina in the eye. Notice that the fovea is rod-free and has a very high density of cones. The density of cones falls of rapidly to a constant level at about 10-15 degrees from the fovea. Notice the blind spot which has no receptors. At about 15°-20° from the fovea, the density of the rods reaches a maximum. (Remember where Hecht, Schlaer, and Pirenne presented their stimuli.) A longitudinal section would appear similar however there would be no blind spot. Remember this if you want to present peripheral stimuli and you want to avoid the blind spot. Here is a figure from the textbook that shows the changes in the size of the photoreceptors with eccentricity. The bottom graph shows individual variations in the density of cones. Here are schematic diagrams of the structure of the rods and cones: This figure shows the variety in the shapes and sizes of receptors across and within species.

Here is a summary of the properties and the differences in properties between the rods and cones: Properties of Rod and Cone Systems Rods Results from degree of spatial integration Achromatic: one type of pigment Chromatic: three types of pigment Color vision results from comparisons between cone responses Pigments If you look above at the schematic diagram of the rods and cones, you will see that in the outer segments of rods the cell membrane folds in and creates disks. In the cones, the folds remain making multiple layers. The photopigment molecules reside in membranes of these disks and folds. They are embedded in the membranes as shown in the diagram below where the two horizontal lines represent a rod disk membrane (either the membrane on the top or bottom of the disk) and the circles represent the chain of amino acids that make up a rhodopsin molecule. Rhodopsin is the photopigment in rods. Each amino acid, and the sequence of amino acids are encoded in the DNA. Each person possesses 23 pairs of chromosomes that encode the formation of proteins in sequences of DNA. The sequence for a particular protein is called a gene.

In recent years, researchers have identified the location and chemical sequence of the genes that encode the photopigments in the rods and cones. This figure shows the structure of the rhodopsin molecule. The molecule forms 7 columns that are embedded in the disk membrane. Although not shown in this schematic, the columns are arranged in a circle like the planks of a barrel. (Another molecule called a chromophore binds within this barrel.) Each circle is an amino-acid which are the building blocks of proteins. Each amino acid is encoded by a sequence of three nucleic acids in the DNA. Before identifying the genetic sequence of human rhodopsin, it was sequences in other animals. Here is shown the comparison between the bovine (cow) sequence and the human sequence. They are very similar with only a small number of differences (the dark circles). Even when there is a difference it may not be functionally significant. The gene for human rhodopsin is located on chromosome 3. The Receptor Mosaic This figure shows how the three cone types are arranged in the fovea. Currently there is a great deal of research involving the determination of the ratios of cone types and their arrangement in the retina.

This diagram was produced based on histological sections from a human eye to determine the density of the cones. The diagram represents an area of about 1° of visual angle. The number of S-cones was set to 7% based on estimates from previous studies. The L-cone:M-cone ratio was set to 1.5. This is a reasonable number considering that recent studies have shown wide ranges of cone ratios in people with normal color vision. In the central fovea an area of approximately 0.34° is S-cone free. The S-cones are semi-regularly distributed and the M- and L-cones are randomly distributed. Throughout the whole retina the ratio of L- and M- cones to S-cones is about 100:1. Spatial Acuity Estimate From Mosaic From the cone mosaic we can estimate spatial acuity or the ability to see fine detail. In the central fovea, there are approximately 150,000 cones/ sq. mm. The distance between cone centers in the hexagonal packing of the cones is about 0.003 mm.

To convert this to degrees of visual angle you need to know that there are 0.29 mm/deg so that the spacing is 0.003/0.29 = 0.013° between cone centers. The Nyquist frequency, f, is the frequency at which aliasing begins. That is a grating pattern of cos(2*pi(N/2+f)) above the Nyquist frequency is indistinguishable from the signal cos(2*pi(N/2-f)) below the Nyquist frequency where N is the number of sample points per unit distance. The Nyquist frequency is f = 1/N. The value of N = 1/0.0102 = 97. Therefore f = 48 cycles per degree. In actuality, the foveal Nyquist limit is more like 60 cycles per degree. This may be a result of the hexagonal rather than the rectangular packing of the cone mosaic. The optics of the eye blur the retinal image so that this aliasing is not produced. Using laser interferometry, the optics of the eye can be bypassed so we can reveal this aliasing.

We will discuss this in more detail in the chapter on visual acuity. The mosaic of the retina in addition to the processing in the visual system produces another ability to see fine resolution and ascertain alignment of object called hyperacuity. People have the ability to see misalignment of objects of 5 seconds of arc (which is 1/5 of a cone width). This corresponds to seeing the misalignment in headlights 39 miles away. Maybe you can try working this out to see if I am exaggerating. Rods and Cones - What Role Do They Play in Macular Degeneration? Rods and Cones Rods and cones are specialized cells, called photoreceptor cells, that are found in the retina and are responsible for our vision. Photoreceptor Cells However, these retinal cells perform different functions making it possible for us to see and to have clear vision during the day and at night. Let me first explain the function these photorecptor cells perform. √ They convert light into electrical messages. These messages are sent to the optic nerve which then send the message to the brain. √ Named for their shape √ Both are found in the retina Dr. J. D.

Solomon, ophthalmologist and author of Overcoming Macular Degeneration: A Guide to Seeing Beyond the Clouds states, "... the most important cells in the process of seeing are the rods and cones." Rod Cells There are many more rods than cone cells in the retina - especially outside the macula. The human eye contains about 130 million rods and about 7 million cones. Rods are: √ Used for our peripheral vision and are concentrated in the outer edges of the retina. √ Responsible for our night vision. Rods are needed for the perception of light and darkness and adapting to night time vision √ Responsible for sensing motion √ Cannot transmit sharp images or perceive fine detail. Cone cells give us our detailed vision √ Not sensitive to and cannot perceive color.

Cone cells allow us to see in color √ Many more rod cells than cone cells are found in the retina - especially outside the macula; rod cells predominate our peripheral vision Cone Cells √ Are concentrated in the macula √ Are the only cells found in the fovea √ Responsible for straight ahead vision √ Responsible for color perception √ Responsible for sharp or detailed vision √ Less sensitive to light than rod cells Ophthalmologist, J.D. Solomon explains, "Each of the cones in the fovea connects with one ganglion cell going directly to the brain. In other parts of the retina, each cone or rod connects to many ganglion cells, decreasing its effective output to the brain." The cone cells are the photoreceptor cells that are most affected by macular degeneration. The breakdown of the surrounding layers of tissue prevents nutrients and oxygen from getting to these cells and from moving built up waste out of the area ...leading to the degeneration or dying of the cells. Photoreceptors consume a surprising amount of fuel.

"They have the highest concentration of mitochondria -- the "furnace" of the cell -- and use more energy than any other cell in the body," says senior investigator Lois Smith, MD, PhD, in Boston Children's Department of Ophthalmology. "They have to be 'on call' all the time to signal light perception and have to recycle their components constantly." Didn't find what you were looking for? Search this site by typing in a keyword and the results will be displayed below: Loading Neuroscience For Kids - Retina you are here: home > explore > retina Neuroscience For Kids The Retina The retina is the back part of the eye that contains the cells that respond to light. These specialized cells are called photoreceptors. There are 2 types of photoreceptors in the retina: rods and cones. The rods are most sensitive to light and dark changes, shape and movement and contain only one type of light-sensitive pigment. Rods are not good for color vision. In a dim room, however, we use mainly our rods, but we are "color blind." Rods are more numerous than cones in the periphery of the retina.

Next time you want to see a dim star at night, try to look at it with your peripheral vision and use your ROD VISION to see the dim star. There are about 120 million rods in the human retina. The cones are not as sensitive to light as the rods. However, cones are most sensitive to one of three different colors (green, red or blue). Signals from the cones are sent to the brain which then translates these messages into the perception of color. Cones, however, work only in bright light. That's why you cannot see color very well in dark places. So, the cones are used for color vision and are better suited for detecting fine details. There are about 6 million cones in the human retina. Some people cannot tell some colors from others - these people are "color blind." Someone who is color blind does not have a particular type of cone in the retina or one type of cone may be weak. In the general population, about 8% of all males are color blind and about 0.5% of all females are color blind. The fovea, shown here on the left, is the central region of the retina that provides for the most clear vision.

In the fovea, there are NO rods...only cones. The cones are also packed closer together here in the fovea than in the rest of the retina. Also, blood vessels and nerve fibers go around the fovea so light has a direct path to the photoreceptors. Here is an easy way to demonstrate the sensitivity of your foveal vision. Stare at the "g" in the word "light" in middle of the following sentence: "Your vision is best when light falls on the fovea." The "g" in "light" will be clear, but words and letters on either side of the "g" will not be clear. One part of the retina does NOT contain any photoreceptors. This is our "blind spot." Therefore any image that falls on this region will NOT be seen. It is in this region that the optic nerves come together and exit the eye on their way to the brain. To find your blind spot, look at the image below or draw it on a piece of paper: Close your left eye. Hold the image (or place your head from the computer monitor) about 20 inches away. With your right eye, look at the dot.

Slowly bring the image (or move your head) closer while looking at the dot. At a certain distance, the + will disappear from sight...this is when the + falls on the blind spot of your retina. Reverse the process. Close your right eye and look at the + with your left eye. Move the image slowly closer to you and the dot should disappear. Here is another image that will help you find your blind spot. For this image, close your right eye. With your left eye, look at the red circle. Slowly move your head closer to the image. At a certain distance, the blue line will not look broken! Did you know? Why can't you see very well when you first go into a darkened room like a movie theater? When you first enter the movie theater, the cones in your retina are working and the rods are not yet activated. Cones need a lot of light to work properly; rods need less light to work, but they need about 7-10 minutes to take over for the cones. After 7-10 minutes in the dark, the rods do work, but you cannot see colors very well because the rods do not provide any color information.

The cones, which do provide color information, need more light, but do not work well in the dark. After the movie is over and you leave the theater, everything looks very bright and it is hard to see for a minute or two. This is because the rods become "saturated" and stop working in these bright conditions. It takes a few minutes for the cones to begin to function again, and for normal vision to be restored. Eye: Rod & Cone (Photoreceptor cells) Eye: Rod & Cone (Photoreceptor cells) Eye: Rod & Cone (Photoreceptor cells) Eye: Rod & Cone (Photoreceptor cells) under a microscope! Beauty may be in the eye of the beholder – but our 100 million rod and 6 million cone cells are doing all the hard work! Find out how we see rainbows and ice cream colors, and old movies and starlight. (Each of our "eyes" comes with 2 black-and-white rods and 1 color cone cell.

Eye: Rod & Cone (Photoreceptor cells) Eye: Rod & Cone (Photoreceptor cells) GMUS-MM-0247 $12.95 Additional Information Sizes Giantmicrobes are based on actual microbes, cells, organisms and other critters, only 1,000,000 times actual size! Gigantic (GG) 16-24" Keychain (KC) 2-4" with clip Materials Plush from all new materials. Stuffed with polyester fiber fill. Surface washable: sponge with water & soap, air dry. Packaging Each plush microbe includes a printed card with fun, educational and fascinating facts about the actual microbe or cell. Safety Every product meets or exceeds U.S. and European standards for safety. For ages 3 and up. All about Eye: Rod & Cone (Photoreceptor cells) Description The rods and cones in our eyes help us see! The rods enable us to see in low light while the cones enable us to see in color. There are three types of cones: the S-cones (short-wavelength sensitive cones), the M-cones (middle-wavelength sensitive cones), and the L-cones (long-wavelength sensitive cones).

Name The rods are rod-shaped while the cones are cone-shaped. Actual Size A rod cell is about 2 microns in diameter and 100 microns long. A cone cell is about .5 to 4 microns in diameter and 40 to 50 microns long. System There are around 120 million rods and 6 to 7 million cones in our eyes! Fascinating Facts Color blindness occurs when the cones, which are responsible for color vision, are not sensitive or totally absent. The most common type of color blindness is red green color blindness! Colorblind people may only be able to differentiate 20 hues of color whereas non-colorblind people can differentiate 100 hues of color. Human beings are more colorblind than pigeons. There are more colorblind males than females. You may also like

Question: Where in the human body would you find cones and rods?
Answer: Eye