Kollache | eBay Stores Deriving the shoe size Foot versus shoe and last The length of a foot is commonly defined as the distance between two parallel lines that are perpendicular to the foot and in contact with the most prominent toe and the most prominent part of the heel. Foot length is measured with the subject standing barefoot and the weight of the body equally distributed on both feet. The size of the left and right foot is often slightly different. In this case, both feet are measured, and the shoe size is based upon the larger foot. Each size of shoe is suitable for a small interval of foot lengths. The inner cavity of a shoe must typically be 15–20 mm (0.6–0.8 in) longer than the foot, but this relation varies between different types of shoes. There are three characteristic lengths that a shoe-size system can refer to: The median length of feet for which a shoe is suitable.For customers, this measure has the advantage of being directly related to their body measures. It applies equally to any type, form, or material of shoe.

However, this measure is less popular with manufacturers,[citation needed] because it requires them to test carefully for each new shoe model, for which range of foot sizes it is recommendable. It puts on the manufacturer the burden of ensuring that the shoe will fit a foot of a given length. The length of the inner cavity of the shoe. This measure has the advantage that it can be measured easily on the finished product. However, it will vary with manufacturing tolerances and provides the customer only very crude information about the range of foot sizes for which the shoe is suitable. The length of the "last," the foot-shaped template over which the shoe is manufactured. This measure is the easiest one for the manufacturer to use, because it identifies only the tool used to produce the shoe. It makes no promise about manufacturing tolerances or for what size of foot the shoe is actually suitable. It leaves all responsibility and risk of choosing the correct size with the customer. Further, the last can be measured in several different ways resulting in different measurements. All these measures differ substantially from one another for the same shoe. Length unit Sizing systems also differ in what units of measurement they use.

This also results in different increments between shoe sizes because usually, only "full" or "half" sizes are made. The following length units are commonly used today to define shoe-size systems: The Paris point equals to ⅔ centimetres (6.6 mm or ~0.26 in). Usually, only full sizes are made, resulting in an increment of ⅔ centimetre. This unit is commonly used in Continental Europe. The barleycorn is an old English unit that equals to ⅓ inch (8.46 mm). Half sizes are commonly made, resulting in an increment of 1⁄6 inch (4.23 mm). This unit is the base for the English and the U.S. sizing system. Further, metric measurements in centimetres (cm) or millimetres (mm) are used. The increment is usually 0.5 cm (5 mm or ~0.20 in), which is between the step size of the Parisian and the English system. It is used with the international Mondopoint system and with the Asian system. Due to the different units of measurements, converting between different sizing systems results in round-off errors as well as unusual sizes such as "10⅔".

Zero point The sizing systems also place size 0 (or 1) at different locations: If size 0 is placed at a foot's length of 0, the shoe size is directly proportional to the length of the foot in the chosen unit of measurement. Sizes of children's, men's, and women's shoes, as well as sizes of different types of shoes, can be compared directly. This is used with the Mondopoint and the Asian system. However, size 0 can also represent a length of the shoe's inner cavity of 0. The shoe size is then directly proportional to the inner length of the shoe. This is used with systems that also take the measurement from the shoe. While sizes of children's, men's and women's shoes can be compared directly, this is not necessarily true for different types of shoes that require a different amount of "wiggle room." This is used with the Continental European system. Further, size 0 (or 1) can just be a shoe with a given length, typically the shortest length deemed practical. This can be different for children's, teenager's, men's, and women's shoes, making it impossible to compare sizes.

For example, a women's shoe at size 8 is a different length from a men's shoe at size 8. Width designators Some systems also include the width of a foot. There are different methods indicating the width: The measured width is indicated in millimetres (mm). This is done with the Mondopoint system. The measured width is assigned a letter (or combination of letters), which is taken from a table (indexed to length and width) or just assigned on an ad-hoc basis: Examples include (each starting with the narrowest width): A, B, C, D, E, EE, EEE, EEEE, F, G 4A, 3A, 2A, A, B, C, D, E, 2E, 3E, 4E, 5E, 6E N (narrow), M (medium) or R (regular), W (wide) The exact foot width for which these sizes are suitable can vary significantly between manufacturers. The A-E width indicators used by some US and UK shoe manufacturers are typically based on the width of the foot, and common step sizes are 1/16 of an inch.

Common sizing systems Mondopoint The International Standard is ISO 9407:1991, Shoe sizes—Mondopoint system of sizing and marking, that recommend a shoe-size system known as Mondopoint. It is based on the mean foot length and width for which the shoe is suitable, measured in millimetres. A shoe size of 280/110 indicates a mean foot length of 280 millimetres (11 in) and width of 110 millimetres (4.3 in). Because Mondopoint also takes the foot width into account, it allows for better fitting than most other systems. It is, therefore, used by NATO and other military services. European standard EN 13402, used also for clothes, recommends, instead, that shoes be labelled with the interval of foot lengths for which they are suitable, measured in centimetres. United Kingdom and Ireland Shoe size in the United Kingdom (British size) is based on the length of the last, measured in barleycorn (approx 1/3 inch) starting from the smallest practical size, which is size zero. It is not formally standardised.

A child's size zero is equivalent to a hand (4 in, 12 barleycorns or 10.16 cm), and the sizes go up to size 13½ (8½ in or 21.59 cm). Thus, the calculation for a child shoe size in the UK is: Child shoe size = 3X last length in inches-12 An adult size one is then the next size up (8⅔ in or 22.01 cm) and each size up continues the progression in barleycorns.[3] The calculation for an adult shoe size in the UK is thus: Adult shoe size = 3X last length in inches - 25 United States and Canada In North America, there are different systems that are used concurrently. The size indications are usually similar but not exactly equivalent, especially with athletic shoes at extreme sizes. Customary The traditional system is similar to English sizes but start counting at one rather than zero, so equivalent sizes is one greater. (This is similar to the way that floors in buildings are numbered from one rather from zero (ground) in these regions).

So the calculation for a male shoe size in the USA or Canada is: male shoe size = 3 X last lenth in inches – 23.5 Women's sizes are almost always determined with the "common" scale, in which women's sizes are equal to men's sizes plus 1.5 (for example, a men's 10.5 is a women's 12). In other words: Female shoe size (common) = 3 X last length in inches – 20.5 In the less popular scale, known as the "standard" or "FIA" (Footwear Industries of America) scale, women's sizes are men's sizes plus 1 (so a men's 10.5 is a women's 11.5). Female shoe size (FIA) = 3 X last length in inches – 21 Children's Children's sizes are equal to men's sizes plus 12.33. Thus, girls' and boys' sizes do not differ, even though men's and women's do.

Child shoe size = 3 X last length in inches – 11.67 Children's shoe stores in the United States use a sizing scheme which ends at 13, after which it starts at 1 again as adult sizes. Brannock Device A slightly different sizing method is based on a measurement device designed by shoe seller Charles Brannock. Many are now found in shoe stores. Men's size 1 is equivalent to a foot's length of 7 ⅔ in;[4]women's sizes are one size up. Male shoe size(Brannock) = 3 X foot length in inches – 22 femal shoe size (Brannock) = 3 X foot length in inches – 21 The method also measures the length of the distance of the heel and the widest point of the foot. For that purpose, the device has another, shorter scale at the side of the foot. If this scale indicates a larger size, it is taken in place of the foot's length. For children's sizes, additional wiggle room is added to allow for growth.

The device also measures the width of the foot and assigns it designations of AAA, AA, A, B, C, D, E, EE, or EEE. The widths are 1/16 in apart and differ by shoe length. Athletic shoes Some makers of athletic shoes, such as Nike, Reebok, or Fila, use an increment of 5 mm instead of half a barleycorn (4.23 mm)[6] As with other systems, women's sizes are one size up. Male shoe size (athletic) = foot length in centimetres − 18 Female shoe size (athletic) = foot length in centimetres − 17 There are different sizes for children's and youths' shoes, for example, Nike uses the following: Shoe size (children) = foot length in centimetres − 6 Shoe size (youth) = foot length in centimetres − 19 It is obvious that due to the different increments, the sizes can be similar to "normal" US sizes only for medium shoe sizes. For shoes that are larger or smaller, the sizes deviate substantially.

Australia Male shoe size = 3 X last length in inches − 22.5 Female shoe size = 3 X last length in inches − 20.5 Continental Europe The Continental European system is used in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and most other continental European countries. In this system, the shoe size is the length of the last, expressed in Paris points, for both genders and for adults and children alike. Because a Paris point is ⅔ of a centimetre, the formula is as follow: Based on foot length, one must first add about 1.5 cm. Asia The Asian system is based on metric measurements and standardised as JIS S 5037:1998, CNS 4800, S 1093, or KS M 6681. Foot length and girth are taken into account. The foot length is indicated in centimetres; an increment of 5 mm is used. This system was also used in the GDR.

The length is followed by designators for girth (A, B, C, D, E, EE, EEE, EEEE, F, G), which is taken from a table indexed to girth and length. There are different tables for men's, women's, and children's (less than 12 years of age) shoes. The tables also include the width as supplemental indications. Not all designators are used for all genders and in all countries. For example, the largest girth for women in China is EEEE, whereas in Japan, it is F. In Japan, one maker also adds an indication for the foot width: N (narrow), M (medium), and W (wide). Shoe size comparison Please, note that the following tables indicate theoretical sizes calculated from the standards and information given above. Differences between these tables and makers' tables or other tables found on the Web are usually due to the following factors: The systems are not fully standardised. Differences between shoes from different makers, which are due to different methods of measuring the shoes, different manufacturing processes, or different allowances are sometimes related to different countries.

A "German" size may then differ from a "French" size, although both countries use the Continental European system. Different widths may have the result that for wide feet, a shoe multiple sizes larger (and actually too long) may be required. This may also result in different size indications, especially if different typical widths are attributed to different sizing systems or countries. Some tables for children take future growth into account. The shoe size is then larger than what would correspond to the actual length of the foot. A indication in centimetres or inches can mean the length of the foot or the length of the shoe's inner cavity. This relation is not constant but varies due to different amounts of wiggle room required for different sizes of shoes. There are several U.S. systems, which differ substantially for sizes far above or below medium sizes. Further, some tables available on the Web simply contain errors. For example, the wiggle room or different zero point is not taken into account, or tables based on different U.S. systems (traditional and athletic) are simply combined although they are incompatible.

Children Example: A child's foot that is 185 millimetres (7.3 in) long requires a shoe that is about 15 millimetres (0.59 in) longer. The inner length of 200 millimetres (7.9 in) is EU shoe size 30 or UK size 11.5. International Shoe Size Chart Notes The Mondopoint system is the same as measuring the foot (not the shoe) in Millimetres (or Millimetres, mm.). However, some companies treat Mondopoint as Centimetres (Centimetres, cm.). So a shoe may be labelled either 240 (mm) or 24 (cm) if it is designed for a foot that is 240 millimetres long (including some wiggle room for socks). You may see mondopoint sizes with two numbers separated by a slash, e.g. 240/95. The second number is the width of the foot in millimetres. American Women's shoe sizes are the same as American Men's shoe sizes plus 1½.

Canadian shoe sizes are equivalent (identical) to American shoe sizes for both Adult and Children's, Men and Women. Mexican shoe sizes plus 1½ are the same as American Men's shoe sizes. British shoe sizes plus 1 are the same as American Men's shoe sizes. However, I see many tables using a formula of British size plus 1½. Check with the manufacturer. I saw one table on the web indicating British women's running shoe sizes were 1.5 plus men's size. I think this is incorrect and mistakenly applied the United States sizing rule to the U.K. Japanese shoes sizes are American Men's shoes sizes plus 18. (Some companies say add 19.) Europe uses a system that came from the French called Paris Points (aka Parisien Prick). One Paris Point equals two-thirds of a centimetre. The system starts at zero centimetres and increases. There are no half sizes. American size 0 is the same as 15 Paris Points. 1 Centimetre (Centimetre) is 10 Millimetres (Millimetres). 1 Inch is 2.54 Centimetres (Centimetres).

Length in Inches = 71/3 + (US Men's shoe size)*1/3 Paris Points = 311/3 + (UK shoe size)*4/3. A Chinese 7 is a UK 4. That's all I know at the moment about sizes of shoes in China. Australia and New Zealand use the same shoe sizes as the United Kingdom for boys, men and girls. However, I have seen women's shoe charts where Australia is 1 or 2 sizes bigger than U.K... I added an entry with one size bigger. Korea measures shoe sizes in millimeters (mm.). I am told Turkey uses European shoe sizes. There are two scales used in the U.S. The standard (or "FIA") scale and the common scales. The "common" scale is more widely used. The scales are about ½ size different. Although different kinds of shoes prefer different measurement systems, I believe the charts work for all kinds of shoes.

(With the caveat of the variations mentioned above.) I have been looking into army, military, ski, hiking, climbing boots, ladies pumps, high-heeled, spike and dress shoes, as well as sneakers, designer shoes, gentlemen's shoes, causal, penny loafers, sandals, and other styles. I have not been researching children's shoes in much detail. The sizes above are also good for soccer, golf, running and other sports shoes. I have not tried bowling shoes or blue suede sneakers. I intend to get more detail on Nike, Reebok, and Adidas due to the strong interest in running shoes for people coming to this page. If you have information or can point me at information about additional measurement systems of systems used by different countries I would be grateful. (I am interested in Latin America and Eastern Europe.) Russian and Ukraine shoe sizes taken from Global7Network.com NOTE I am told these values are incorrect. Russia, Ukraine and other countries of the former USSR use European shoe sizes. There is no difference for men, women, girls and boys. In the 1980s a system using shoe sizes measured in centimetres was introduced. The change was not widely accepted.

You can occasionally find shoes measured in centimetres, but most are marked with European system. Russian and Ukraine shoe sizes taken from Global7Network.com NOTE I am told these values are incorrect. Russia, Ukraine and other countries of the former USSR use European shoe sizes. There is no difference for men, women, girls and boys. In the 1980s a system using shoe sizes measured in centimetres was introduced. The change was not widely accepted. You can occasionally find shoes measured in centimetres, but most are marked with European system. An eBay Store maintained by: Anyone know the difference in length between size 9 and 10 shoes? - Overclockers UK Forums Anyone know the difference in length between size 9 and 10 shoes? User Name Posts: 3,782 Anyone know the difference in length between size 9 and 10 shoes? I bought some Caterpillar boots online the other day in size 10 and for some reason they dont come close to fitting (i'm a size 10 in everything else). With my toes at the end of the boot there's a good 1cm gap between my heel and the heel of the boot.

Does anyone know how much smaller a size 9 would be since they dont seem to do half sizes? Thanks. 5820K | 16gb Ram | Palit 1070 SJ | Crucial 256gb SSD | Asus X99-A II | EVGA 850W | Phanteks Enthoo Evolv I don't even like pancakes. Isn't it a barley corn? Location: Koronation Strasse Posts: 17,611 You must be crazy buying shoes online without trying them on first. At least go and exploit a highstreet retailer first and then buy them online to make your ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ saving AMD K6-2 400 - 64Mb RAM - 8Mb GFX 6Gb HDD Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 4,599 Don't ever buy shoes online, I am size 9 but some shoes/boots are different size even though it says size 9. Some are too big some too small, it's same with clothes, small size is large for others.

PSN - apatia7 Quote: Originally Posted by Jonny69 You must be crazy buying shoes online without trying them on first. At least go and exploit a highstreet retailer first and then buy them online to make your ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ saving I usually always get my shoes online. I've never had a problem with bad fitting pairs. Q6600 3.78GHz | GTX 670 | Corsair HX650 | 4GB PC8500 | LT X48-T2R Location: house Posts: 4,098 could always buy 3 different sizes at the same time and return the 2 that don't fit, cause they don't fit. Location: In my own little world Posts: 14,238 I can't get my feet high enough to check MW I can't get my feet high enough to check MW it'll depend on your res too Posts: 3,782 Thanks guys.

5820K | 16gb Ram | Palit 1070 SJ | Crucial 256gb SSD | Asus X99-A II | EVGA 850W | Phanteks Enthoo Evolv Quote: There are three characteristic lengths that a shoe-size system can refer to: The median length of feet for which a shoe is suitable. For customers, this measure has the advantage of being directly related to their body measures. It applies equally to any type, form, or material of shoe. However, this measure is less popular with manufacturers,[citation needed] because it requires them to test carefully for each new shoe model, for which range of foot sizes it is recommendable. It puts on the manufacturer the burden of ensuring that the shoe will fit a foot of a given length. The length of the inner cavity of the shoe. This measure has the advantage that it can be measured easily on the finished product. However, it will vary with manufacturing tolerances and provides the customer only very crude information about the range of foot sizes for which the shoe is suitable. The length of the "last," the foot-shaped template over which the shoe is manufactured.

This measure is the easiest one for the manufacturer to use, because it identifies only the tool used to produce the shoe. It makes no promise about manufacturing tolerances or for what size of foot the shoe is actually suitable. It leaves all responsibility and risk of choosing the correct size with the customer. Further, the last can be measured in several different ways resulting in different measurements.[1] All these measures differ substantially from one another for the same shoe. Length unit Sizing systems also differ in what units of measurement they use. This also results in different increments between shoe sizes because usually, only "full" or "half" sizes are made. The following length units are commonly used today to define shoe-size systems: The Paris point equals to ⅔ centimetres (6.6 mm or ~0.26 in). Usually, only full sizes are made, resulting in an increment of ⅔ centimetre. This unit is commonly used in Continental Europe. The barleycorn is an old English unit that equals to ⅓ inch (8.46 mm). Half sizes are commonly made, resulting in an increment of 1⁄6 inch (4.23 mm). This unit is the base for the English and the U.S.

sizing system. Further, metric measurements in centimetres (cm) or millimetres (mm) are used. The increment is usually 0.5 cm (5 mm or ~0.20 in), which is between the step size of the Parisian and the English system. It is used with the international Mondopoint system and with the Asian system. Due to the different units of measurements, converting between different sizing systems results in round-off errors as well as unusual sizes such as "10⅔". Also of interest: Quote: Shoe size in the United Kingdom (British size) is based on the length of the last, measured in barleycorn (approx 1/3 inch) starting from the smallest practical size, which is size zero. It is not formally standardised. A child's size zero is equivalent to a hand (4 in, 12 barleycorns or 10.16 cm), and the sizes go up to size 13ï¿½ (8ï¿½ in or 21.59 cm).

Thus, the calculation for a child shoe size in the UK is: 3 x foot length in inches- 12 An adult size one is then the next size up (8⅔ in or 22.01 cm) and each size up continues the progression in barleycorns.[3] The calculation for an adult shoe size in the UK is thus: 3 x foot length in inches- 25 5820K @ 4.75Ghz, Asus Strix X99 Gaming, 32Gb Gskill Trident Z 3200 C14, Titan X Pascal @29C, Custom Water Loop, Samsung 951 SSD, Samsung 930 SSD, 4 x 2 TB WD Ent in Raid 5, Benq 32" 4k THE HISTORY OF SHOES | Shoe Costing Forum's All about costing shoes in Indonesia Factory (Forum’s) THE HISTORY OF SHOES Shoes both protect feet as well as, when incompatible in size and shape, present exciting factors in inflam-matory conditions e.g. bunion. Despite the presence of pain, people are reluctant to change their footwear styles.

The main function of modern footwear is to provide feet with protection from hard and rough surfaces, as well as climate and environmental exposure. To the wearer the appearance of their footgear is often more important than its (mis) function. Consumer resistance to change style is common. Informed decisions of shoe styles are thought to occur when the benefits of alternative shoe styles are carefully explained and footwear habits discussed in a culturally sensitive manner. The author, in the interests of intellectual exchange, explores the world of shoe making in an attempt to inform both lay person and health professional. Anatomy of the Shoe Further Reading Anatomy of the shoe According to McPhoil (1988) the anatomy of a shoe can be divided in an upper and lower (or bottom part). Sections of the upper include vamp, quarter, toebox, throat, insole board, and topline. The sections of the lower shoe consist of an outsole, shank and heel. The Upper of the Shoe All parts or sections of the shoe above the sole that are stitched or otherwise joined together to become a unit then attached to the insole and outsole. The upper of the shoe consists of the vamp or front of the shoe, the quarter i.e.

the sides and back of the shoe, and the linings. Uppers are made in a variety of different materials, both natural and synthetic. Leather became the obvious cover of choice because it allowed air to pass through to and from the skin pores thereby providing an opportunity to keep the feet, cool. The plastic properties of animal skins further help mould the shoe to the foot beneath. The ability for leather to crease over flexor surfaces facilitate the function of the foot. Ironically synthetics used as uppers display elastic properties, which mean the shoe upper never quite adjusts to the foot, shape in the same way as natural leather. Synthetics are cheaper to mass-produce and are now found in most mass produced footwear. Synthetic uppers are more waterproof. Woven fabric such as cotton corduroy can be used as uppers. Classified as breathable fabrics these help aeration. Vamp The vamp covers the dorsum of the foot (includes the tongue piece) and superior aspects over the toes. This section i.e. the toe puff is reinforced which serves to give the shoe its shape as well as protect the toes. The vamp is often made of more than one piece, creating a decorative pattern.

There are various types of vamps suited to different styles of shoes. Quarter The complete upper part of the shoe behind the vamp line covering the sides and backpart. The top edge of the sides and back of the quarter describes the topline of the shoe. In athletic shoes the topline is often padded and referred to as a collar. The medial and lateral sections join in a seam at the posterior end of the shoe. In Oxford style lacing shoes, the eyelet section is formed by the superior part of the quarter (while the underlying tongue is part of the vamp). In the Gibson style the lacing segment forms part of the vamp. The heel section of the quarter is frequently reinforced with a stiffener. This helps support the rearfoot. In boots the quarter is often referred to as ‘top’. In the Bal method, the front edges of both quarters are stitched together and covered with the back edge of the vamp. In the Blucher method the quarter panels are placed on top of the vamp, and the front edges are not sewn together. In comparison with the Bal method, the Blucher method permits the fitting of a larger foot girth by broadening the throat of the shoe.

A convalescent shoe (open to toe) is a variation on the Blucher method in which the lacing extends to the front edge of the vamp. In athletic shoes the vamp and quarter panels are often one continuous piece of nylon or leather with additional leather pieces added to reinforce critical areas of the shoe. Reinforcement added to the region of the medial longitudinal arch are termed the saddle if it is added to the outside of the shoe or the arch bandage if it is added to the inside of the shoe. The counter is a component of the quarter that stabilises the hindfoot in the shoe and retains the shape of the posterior portion of the shoe. Counters are usually made from fibreboard or heat moulded plastic. Foxing is an additional piece of leather that covers the counter externally. Sometimes a counter will extend medially to support the heel and prevent prolonged pronation. In some children’s shoes and athletic footwear the stiffener is extended on the medial of the arch to provide an anti-pronatory wedge. you are here Toecap Many shoes incorporate a toecap into the upper of the shoe.

Toecaps are either stitched over or completely replace the distal superior aspect of the vamp and can be made into a decorative features referred to as toe tips. The toe box refers to the roofed area over and around the part of the shoe that covers the toes. The function of the toe box is to retain the shape of the forefoot and allow room for the toes. The height and width of the toe box is dictated by shape of the last used to construct the shoe. Certain types of non-athletic and athletic footgear will offer extra depth in the toe box. Linings In quality shoes the quarters and vamps are lined to enhance comfort and durability. Linings may consist of various materials ie leathers, fabrics, and manmade synthetics. The lining on the insole segment is called ‘the sock’ and may be full-length, three-quarter or just the heel section. Many linings are made of syn-thetic material and are usually confined to the quarters and the insock. Throat The central part of the vamp just proximal to the toe box. The throat is formed by the seam joining the vamp to the quarter i.e. throatline.

The position of the throat line depends on the construction of the shoe, for example a shorter vamp and longer quarters define a lower throat line. This gives a wider lower opening for the foot to enter the shoe. The throat is defined by the connection of the rear edge of the vamp and the front part of the quarter. The location of the throat will vary with the design of the shoe. Because the vamp and quarter panels are often one piece in the athletic shoe, the throat is at the eyestay. This refers to the point where the lacing is attached to the vamp. The throat of the shoe dictates the maximum girth permitted by the shoe. The Sole of the Shoe The term sole derives from ‘solea’ a Latin word meaning soil or ground. Insole (inner sole) A layer of material shaped to the bottom of the last and sandwiched between the outsole (or midsole) and the sole of the foot inside the shoe. The insole covers the join between the upper and the sole in most methods of construction and provides attachment for the upper, toe box linings and welting. This provides a platform upon which the foot can operate and separates the upper from the lower.

The insole board is necessary in shoes that are constructed using cemented or Goodyear welt techniques because it is the attachment for upper and lower components. The majority of insole boards are made of cellulose and are treated with additives to inhibit bacterial growth. Athletic shoewear will often have a sockliner, a piece of material placed over the top of the insole board (glued in position or removable. Outsole This is the outer most sole of the shoe, which is directly exposed to abrasion and wear. Traditionally made from a variety of materials, the outsole is constructed in different thickness and degrees of flexibility. Ideal soling materials must be waterproof, durable and possess a coefficient of friction high enough to prevent slipping. Leather has poor gripping capabilities and synthetic polymers are much preferred. There are also an infinite variety of surface designs. Extra grip properties can be incorporated in the form of a distinctive sole pattern with well-defined ridges. Alternatively they can be moulded with cavities to reduce the weight of the sole. These cavities need to be covered with a rigid insole or can be filled with light foam to produce a more flexible sole.

In some cases two or more materials of different densities can be incorporated into the sole to give a hard wearing outer surface and a softer, more flexible midsole for greater comfort. Synthetic soling materials will off the physical property of dampening down impact levels (shock attenuation). Shank The shank bridges between the heel breast and the ball tred. The shankpiece or shank spring can be made from wood, metal, fibreglass or plastic and consists of a piece approximately 10cm long and 1.5 cm wide. The shank spring lies within the bridge or waist of the shoe, i.e. between heel and ball corresponding to the medial and lateral arches. The shankpiece reinforces the waist of the shoe and prevents it from collapsing or distorting in wear. The contour of the shank is determined by heel height. Shoes with low heels or wedged soles do not require a shank because the torque between the rear and forefoot does not distort the shoe. Heel The heel is the raised component under the rear of the shoe. Heels consist of a variety of shapes, heights, and materials and are made of a series of raised platforms or a hollowed section.

The part of the heel next to sole is usually shaped to fit the heel, this is called the heel seat or heel base. The heel breast describes front face of the heel. The ground contact section is called the top piece. Heels raise the rear of the shoe above the ground. A shoe without a heel or midsole wedge may be completely flat. When the heel section sits lower than the forefoot the style is called a ‘negative heel’. Welt The strip of material which joins the upper to the sole. Most shoes will be bonded by Goodyear-welted construction. Some shoes use an imitation welt stitched around the top flat edge of the sole for decorative purposes, but it is not a functional part of the shoe. Shoe Lasts and Metrology Most shoes are made to a last. This is a foot model with dimensions and shape similar to the anatomical foot but sufficiently different to not be exact. Shoe fit and to some extent the last influences its durability. Last “The close relationship between a man and his shoe maker was based on the shared secret of the client’s measurements. The statistics of clients were never disclosed.” Traditionally before mass production, the original shoemaker started the process by taking a footprint outline of the sole.

He whittled or chiselled a wooden last from the print. A last ( ‘laest’, Old English meaning footprint) was traditionally made from wood but are now available now in metal or plastic. They are complex structures made from many measurements (statistically determined). Lasts are not the same size and dimensions of the anatomical foot but instead an abstract form with specific functions. It is usually deeper in the midfoot region, has a sharp ‘feather edge’ where the upper surface meets the sole, is clipped in along the topline (around the ankle) and is flaired over and extended in the toe region. This provides shape, which applies appropriate tension when the shoe distorts to contain the loaded foot. Lasts provides a working surface on which flat leather components can be given plastic form. The physical dimensions accommodate the foot during activity and the last contains contemporary fashion and styles such as toe shape. To allow the last to be removed from the shoe they are often hinged around the instep. Shoe lasts are not made to resemble feet but instead to suit the shoe manufacture. Modern lasts are totally unlike the foot with the sole of the last, flat in order to assist in manufacture.

Shoe making was classified under three headings: turned shoes, welted shoes and through-seam shoes. Turned shoe The turned shoe is made inside out with only an outset sole between the foot and the ground. The upper and soles are very flexible. The last is designed in a single size and then a set is made in the range of sizes and widths in which shoes are to be manufactured. Marked sizes will vary slightly from one manufacturer to another. No longer a popular technique. Welted Shoes Any construction using a welting, either as an intrigal part of the construction or simply for imitative effect. Through Seam Shoes Anthropometry Studies show over 90% of people have different sized feet. Despite feet being the same length other dimensions vary with the individual foot. Activity of the foot will also change the shape of identical feet in accordance with the structure and function of the appendage. The idea of a perfect fit is not a reality. Because distribution or proportions of foot mass differ with individuals, which mean linear measurement such as length and breadth of the foot alone, are inadequate. It is important shoemakers consider mass and volume of feet if an exact fit is to be afforded.

To ensure a best fit, measurements are taken at strategic locations and the shoemaker uses both linear as well volume measurement to construct a shoe. The modern last is made in three dimensions although it is not a direct replica of the foot. Instead it is made with production requirements, in mind. The lastmaker may take up to 35 measurements before the model last can be made. A shoe fitter may concentrate on length, ball width, heel, topline, arch and instep. The shoe is expected to wear well, feel well, keep its shape with wear, retain its style character, tread properly, allow for reasonable foot freedom, maintain both foot and shoe balance, remain structurally intact. These features are not always dependent on the quality of materials or components, or the manufacturing process. The design and multiple dimensions of the last provide the basis for the above. Features built into a last include: Measurements The majority of measurements are volume rather than the traditional length and width associated with shoe fit. Throat opening The distance from the vamp point to the back seam tuck. Length The length measurement of the foot from the back of the heel to the tip of the longest toe. Foot Girth There are four girth and circumference measurements taken on a last.

These are the ball, waist, instep and heel (back of heel to instep). Measurement requires careful assessment of the foot, which cannot be accomplished with the same precision as linear measurements. The modern last maker uses precision instruments to determine girth but the old shoemakers used the hand span to this same effect. Aspects of the foot were measured against the shoemaker’s hand, the ball of the foot was compared to the girth between the thumb and the middle finger. The instep was measured between the thumb and the little finger. This method was subject to enormous variations depending upon the size of the shoemaker’s hand. *Ball girth This is the girth measurement around the ball of the last to determine the width and volume allowance inside the shoe. * Waist girth The girth at the waist on the last. * Instep girth The circumference around the foot at the instep. * Heel girth The distance around the foot from the rear base of the heel to the top of the instep. Recede Toe This is the part of the last, which projects beyond the tip of the toes forming the rounded contour of the front of the shoe.

A tapering recede such as in todays sharp shoes increases the overall length of the shoe. In a poorly designed last the recede may encroach on the toes increasing tension on the ends of the toes. This may be referred to as tight lasting. Heel-to-ball This dictates the position of the hinge of the forefoot (metatarsal phalangeal joints) and the widest part of the shoe (across the metatarsal heads). Toe Spring This describes the elevation of the undersurface of the sole at the toe to give a slight rocker effect to the shoe. The amount of toe spring (built into the last) depends on the shoe style, sole thickness and heel height. This is built into the last design and compensates for the stiffness of the footwear and provided a stress free take off into propulsion. The more rigid the soling material the greater the toe spring. Many shoes will also display a slight heel spring. Tread This describes the width across the sole under the ball of the last and it should correspond to the dimension of the feet. The tread point on the last represents the bottom forepart just behind the ball and in contact with the base plane. Flare This describes the curve or contour of the last.

The swing is determined by the position of the forepart when the last is bisected longitudinally forwards from the centre of the heel arc. With In inflare lasts there is an inward medial swing to the forepart and most modern shoes are made on an inflare last (banana last) because it is thought shoes are more comfortable. An outflare last describes the opposite with the swing lying to the lateral side of the forepart. Sometimes used in bespoke footwear for infants with diagnosed foot development problems. Straights last describe neither an inflare or outflare preference. The long axis of the last when drawn through the bisection of the heel curve describes two equal longitudinal halves. The normal foot has a straight axis and hence straight lasted shoes can be worn on either foot. Prior to the introduction of machinery to make heeled shoes it was common to have shoe made with a straight flare until the turn of the twentieth century. Methods of Shoe Construction There are many ways to attach the sole to the upper but commercially only a few methods are preferred. Shoes were traditionally made by moulding leather to a wooden last. Modern technology has introduced many new materials and mechanised much of the manufacture. Remarkable as it may seem the manufacture of shoes remains fairly labour intensive.

No matter the type of construction the first stage in construction is to attach the insole to the undersurface of the last. Two main operations follow : Lasting describes the upper sections are shaped to the last and insole. Followed by Bottoming, where the sole is attached to the upper. The process of bottoming will determine price, quality and performance of the shoe. Cement Alernative names include:’Stuck on construction’ (UK) and the ‘Compo Process’. For lightweight and flexible footwear the outsole is stuck to the upper by an adhesive. Bonwelt is a variation with its distinguishing feature being a strip of welting attached by stitching or cementing to the top edge of the insole. The shoe is then flat lasted. This is not a true welt construction wherein the welt is attached to the rib of the insole. Goodyear Welt For high quality dress and town shoes the top section (or welt) is chain stitched to the upper and insole rib at the point where it curves under the last. This is supplemented by a lockstitch outseam bonding the welt and outsole. The outsole is then sewn to the welt around the edge. Goodyear Welt creates heavier less flexible footwear.

Stitchdown Alernative names include: Veldt or veldschoen A cheaper method used to produce lightweight flexible soles for children’s shoes and some casual footwear describes the upper turned out (flanged) at the edge of the last. This is then stitched to the runner. In some countries it is known as ‘veldt’ and ‘veldtschoen.’ Mocassin Thought to be the oldest shoe construction this consists of a single layer section, which forms the insole, vamp and quarters. The piece is moulded upwards from the Under surface of the last. An apron is then stitched to the gathered edges of the vamp and the sole is stitched to the base of the shoe. This method is used for flexible fashion footwear. The imitation moccasin has a visual appearance of a moccasin but does not have the wrap around construction of the genuine moccasin. Moulded Methods The lasted upper is placed in a mould and the sole formed around it by injecting liquid synthetic soling material (PVC, urethane). Alternatively, the sole may be vulcanised by converting uncured rubber into a stable compound by heat and pressure. When the materials in the moulds cool the sole-upper bonding is complete.

These methods combine the upper permanently into the sole and such shoes cannot therefore be repaired easily. Moulded methods can be used to make most types of footwear. Force Lasting Alternative names include:The Strobel-stitched method (or sew in sock) Force lasting has evolved from sport shoes but is increasingly used in other footwear. The Strobel-stitched method (or sew in sock) describes one of many force lasting techniques. The upper is sewn directly to a sock by means of an overlooking machine (Strobel stitcher) The upper is then pulled (force lasted) onto a last or moulding foot. Unit soles with raised walls or moulded soles are attached to completely cover the seam. This technique is sometimes known as the Californian process or slip lasting. Shoe Styles According to Rossi (1997) there are eight basic footwear styles with the rest made up as variations on the basic themes. To comply with definition a shoe describes footwear with a mechanism capable of holding the foot in the heel of the shoe to facilitate support during push off. Hence there are two critical aspect of shoes i.e.. the band around the instep and the section corresponding to the human heel.

To prevent unnecessary movement these need to be firm and fit the foot. Boot Any footwear extending above the ankle. There are numerous designs and types for a variety of uses and made from a number of materials. Clog A thick soled wooden shoe sometimes with leather upper. Lace Up ( 2 types ): Any low cut shoe fastened by lacings, such as an Oxford or Blucher. Moccasin The term moccasin originates from the Algonquian language for foot covering. The Algonquians were any of several North American Indian tribes formerly inhabiting the region along the Ottawa River and near the northern tributaries of the St. Lawrence River. The oldest form of shoe dates back to 14,000 years and was thought to originate from the Mongol tribes who migrated along the Bering Strait into North America. Originally it described a simple one-piece hide, wrapped round the foot and held on with rawhide thongs. Later the Indians gradually stylised the moccasin by adding the moccasin plug, fringes and coloured beads, which depicted rank and occupation. Today moccasin shoes usually describe imitation moccasins, which had their origins in Norway.

The Norwegian Peasant Slip-on (or weejun) was first imported to the US by tourists in the 1930s and later Gucci made a leather loafer in refined calfskin with a metal snaffle bit across the instep. Soon loafers were available in the spectator style (two colours). By the 50s Penny Loafers were all the rage with the campus Ivy League of the US. Made in ox blood they were also known as the Norwegian slipper. The Low vamp loafer was designed for females and was made from soft kid leather and cut low. Mule A backless shoe or slipper with or without a heel. Sandal ( 3 types ): – Casuals Originally a slab of leather sole attached to the foot by thongs. Today any open shoe who’s upper consists of any decorative or functional arrangement of straps. A sandal can be foot low to knee high, or with any heel height, designed for simple utility or casual wear or as a fashion shoe. Monks Similar to Derby Shoes but with a cross over section to fasten the quarters with a side buckle. Pumps Heeled shoes with low cut fronts and usually no fastening.

Shoe Size System A continual frustration to many who care for the foot weary is the absence of a standard shoe size system. Although metrology and reliable measurements have been in existence for approximately two hundred years, the concept of a shoe sizing system is relatively recent. Shoe sizing systems based on standard metrological measurements have been in existence for just over 100 years but shoes made in half sizes have only been available half that time. As part of the protection many craftsmen operated in early times, shoes were individually coded. Like a painter signing the canvas, shoemakers marked the inside of the shoe with their persona codes. This deliberately kept the size a secret from the customer and virtually ensured their return for new shoes. This is still in evidence today and many manufacturers maintain individual size systems in order to promote customer loyalty. The first US record of shoes marked with sizes dates back to between 1860 and 1870. The procedure soon followed in England. It was only full sizes recorded (half sizes did not appear until the late 1880s). In 1886 the Hanan Shoe Co. were the first manufacturer to stamp their name on their shoes.

In 1888 the first fitting stool was introduced to the trade by Sollers Shoe Manufacturing Co., Philadephia. The Shoe Stick The origin of shoe sticks date back to antiquity. They were described in Ancient Egypt, Rome and Greece and used by shoe and sandal makers. For centuries there was no shoe size standards or systems and each craftsman was free to use his own method. It was common to use their own bodies particularly their hands as gauges. An English yard for example was the length of the arm i.e. shoulder to fingertips or sometimes nose to fingertips. The problem was not everyone was the same size and when a human foot was used to measure footage of land, much depended on the size of the individual as to how much the purchaser bought and the seller sold. In Rome, the inch (which was one twelfth of a foot) measured the width across the interphalangeal joint of the thumb. By the 7th century in England, the barleycorn became a standard measurement with three ears of corn, laid end to end, equalling one inch. It took until the thirteenth century before the inch was officially sanctioned. Under pressure, Edward II (r.

1307-27) eventually succumbed to appeals from scholars and tradesmen to issue a decree to standardise measurement (Ledger, 1985). Henceforth an English inch was the distance measured across three barleycorns taken from the centre of the ear and placed end to end equalled an inch. Thirty nine (39) barleycorns laid end to end became a foot and 117 laid end to end became a yard. Whilst the barleycorn decree of Edward II had nothing to do with shoe sizes per se many shoemakers began to use shoe sticks. Tradesmen had traditionally used the handspan method of measurement, which preferred the quarter of an inch unit, but after the introduction of the barleycorn measure, many began to adopt the third of an inch unit. With 39 barley corns approximating the length of a normal foot, this was graded size 13 and became the largest shoe size. Other sizes were graded down by 1/3 rd of an inch or one barleycorn. It took until 1850 before the first uniform shoe stick using the English size system appeared.

Ironically this took place in France and shoe sticks were not accepted in North America, until after 1900.Today shoes are marked according to one of three different length sizing systems depending on where the shoes were made. The three major systems are United Kingdom, American and Continental (or Paris Point): UK System The first description of a shoe sizing system was made and recorded by British genealogist Randle Holme in the Academy of Armory and Blazon in 1688. The UK System starts from zero, at 102 mm with 8.4mm (1/4 “) between whole sizes (4.2mm between half sizes). Adults sizes range from size 1 to size 15 (equivalent to 12″). The UK System for children is divided into 13 parts. Sizes start at five inches long and every fourth part of an inch thereafter until, size 12. Size 13 or short 13 and consists of length of 8 inches and a quarter. This also starts the Adult size 1.

Third Inch Scale (Barley Corn):2-5-8-1-4-7-0-3-6-9 UK System Quarter Inch Scale: Child Sizes :0-5.25-5.5-5.75-6.0-6.25-6.75-7.0-7.25-7.5-7.75-8.0-8.25-8.5 Adult Sizes:8.5-8.75-9.0-9.25-9.5-9.75-10.0-10.25-10.5-10.75-11.0-11.25-11.5-11.75-12 Children’s Shoes Until the time of Queen Victoria , children’s shoes were made as miniature adult shoes, with no special feature for growing feet. The children of the Middle Class in Victorian times wore shoe styles more akin to fancy dress which may account for why the design of today’s shoes contain motifs which refer to previous ages and classic periods of history.

Going barefoot is still within living memory and many children went without footwear as a normal practice and not through poverty. Work shoes were often handed down with the better off wearing them before passing them to siblings. It is not clear why a unit of 13 was used to judge a critical point between child sizes and adults. The origins of this remain clouded but there are several theories. It is understood early English shoemakers started with the smallest size (0 or 1) at four inches. Four inches was an easy measure to record because it was the width across the knuckles which happened to correspond to the size of a child’s foot needing their first pair of shoes. By coincidence 4.22 ” measured 13 barleycorns. The next easy measure was the span of the hand or 9″. Measure across the knuckles (4″) plus the span of the hand (9″) gave 13″. This measured the average length of a child’s foot at puberty. Adult sizes would logically start at the end of the child’s size. Another belief is based on a foot measuring practice at the time. Some historians believe shoemakers accepted 13 as the base unit for measuring feet.

The shoemaker’s size stick was twelve inches long with the units measured from zero. This meant twelve became thirteen. There have been several attempts to standardise measurements of shoes and adopt the quarter inch unit, however arguments have always failed due to costs and problems of changing to a new system. As early as the seventeenth century, according to Holme, a “guild of shoemakers” had agreed on a common size scale based on a quarter inch rather than the third of inch. However little had changed by the nineteenth century when Gardener described in 1856 a shoe sizing system based on one-third inch, scale. The barleycorn , for all its metrological shortcomings, continues to be used in both American and English sizing systems. American System The first shoe sizing system with detailed proportional measurements for lasts and shoes came from North America. The instigator, Edwin B Simpson of New York, prepared the first chart of standardised last measurements in 1880. This included shoe widths but it was another seven years before the Retail Boot and Shoe Dealer’s National Association adopted the system.

Much of the impetus to introduce a size system had arisen during the American Civil War (1861-65) where mass produced shoes were made in left and rights for the first time. As the main shoe manufacturers were in the North then orders for soldiers required a size system. To make it easier for the Army to order shoes for their servicemen, each soldier was allocated a shoe size as well as a nametag. Despite the availability of inflare footwear, these were not comfortable and many complained. The Confederacy fought barefoot. Right and left shoes were not commercially available for another half century. Although North America legalised the use of the metric system the industry did not adopt it as the only means. Regular reviews of regulation have meet similar non-compliance. Consequently there remains little standardisation of shoe sizes within the US. Ironically the industry continues to use Imperial measurements and each manufacturer determines how large a certain size will be. The only standardisation is each full size is 1/3 of an inch longer than the previous size. Women’s shoes are marked 1 1/2 sizes different than men’s (a size 9 women’s shoe is equal in length to a size 7 1/2 men’s shoe).

In the American (or Standard) System the first number in the code represents the width (1 = A, 2 = B) The second number followed by a zero denotes the whole size: when the second number is followed by a 5 it indicates a half size. UK :1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10-11-12-13 Mondo:220-227-236-245-252-260-270-278-286-298-305-312-320mm10.75 Continental System (Paris Point metric) The Europeans used a metric system and hence each full size (or two thirds of a centimetre) is less than a full size but more than the half size. North America is one of the few countries, which is still using imperial measurement whereas most other countries have adopted a metric system. Gabriel Mouton, a French vicar, first introduced the metric system in 1670. In 1801 after several modifications the French officially adopted the measurement system.

The French system does not support half sizes. Infant sizes start at size 15 (equivalent to 0) and each size then progresses by two thirds of a centimetre. By 1875 several nations had got together to discuss adoption of the Paris Point System and whilst countries like North America legalised the use of the metric system, the industry refused to adopt it as the only means. Mondo Point This was a proposed international shoe sizing system based on the metric system. The idea originated in Australia and was intended to replace English, French, Italian and other size systems. Mondopoint provided a uniform system of shoe sizes among the nations of the world. The sizes were based on millimetres. Shoes were described as 255/98 or 255 millimetres long and 98 millimetres broad. Sizes progressed from the smallest to the largest, from children’s through to adults without interruption. Foot size was determined with the person weight bearing. Width Fitting Shoe width represents both the linear and girth measurements at the ball, and is determined by the last. Several standard and width fittings are available in the UK size system to accommodate differences in three-dimensional girth.

In women’s shoes, A is the narrowest and G the widest. For children the range is A to H; and for men it is from 1-8. The girth increase between fittings is normally 6.5mm. Most lines are only available in one size usually women’s D and men’s 4. The girth around the ball of the foot of the foot increases by 5mm for whole sizes up to children’s size 101/2 and 6.5mm for whole sizes above this. In the American system it is two less, eg AAA is the equivalent to the UK A. There is no equivalent Continental width fitting system and the shoes are generally narrower than in the UK. In the American (or Standard) System the first number in the code represents the width (1 = A, 2 = B) The second number followed by a zero denotes the whole size: when the second number is followed by a 5 it indicates a half size. In the American (Arithmetic standard width measurement) this ranges from AAAAA to EEEEEE. Assessing Footwear Most clients attend for treatment wearing dress shoes, which are not always their normal footgear.

In those situations where shoe costume and foot are considered incompatible, practitioners may tactfully request the client bring the footwear worn for the majority of the working day. In situations where client’s shoes contribute to subjective symptoms but no apparent conscious acceptance is obvious then the practitioner may accept the clients personal choice is a life style decision. Adverse shoe conditions can excite pathologies, compromise prognosis and inhibit satisfactory practice but the choice of footwear always remains with the client. Under these circumstances negotiated care is required where neither party is compromised. It is important to ascertain a client’s shoe wearing habits. Information about when, where, and how often shoes are bought can be very useful. To avoid a ‘halo effect’, however, assessment should involve tact and sensitivity, combined with a healthy scepticism. People will often report shoe-wearing habits they consider appropriate to a healthy life style especially in the presence of a foot physician. When gathering information tolerance is a virtue, with discretion and understanding essential assets. A sad fact in this day and age is not everyone can afford shoes, especially where multiple children are involved. People buy shoes to meet specific purposes and all gain benefit from well informed advice. Most obtain perfectly adequate footwear from general or specialised retail outlets.

For some, shoes require minor modification to accommodate specific requirements, such as a short leg, whereas a small minority need shoes made specifically to fit their feet ie. bespoke footwear. Made for feet shoes are classified as modular ie a type of footwear fabricated using stock lasts to which minor adjustments can be made; and True, bespoke footwear, which is, made form a customed last. These are available privately or with assistance from medical funds when prescribed. Mass produced or stock footwear is available single size/width or half size multi-width fittings. The former is usual for adult sizes and the latter more common in children shoes. A list of good habits is in itself inappropriate and it is important to have reference to an appropriate portfolio ie shoe catalogue and suppliers if you wish to inform clients. Most fashion shoes are bought in self-service outlets, including the World Wide Web. Socio-economics determine the vast majority of shoe buyers can ill afford quality footwear associated with personal fitting or made to measure footwear. Most people prescribed orthopaedic footwear require some financial assistance. Problems with fit The problems are rarely single and often are multifactorial. Asymmetry and anatomical variation mean challenges for people seeking ideal fit. The style and pattern of a shoe bear an influence on size.

The distribution of mass or volume within the shoe affects size and fit. The height of the heel can affect deportment and function, hence the shape of the foot. Shoe types such as fashion footwear and work boots may be fitted with a bit more size allowance than the slightly snugger fit of an elegant fashion or dress shoe. The type of shoe construction can bare an influence. e.g. welts, cements, slip lasted, stitchdown, injection-moulded etc, will show slight differences in fit on the foot. Some manufacturers or brands apply their own particular specifications of dimensions on their lasts e.g. backpart, forepart, tread, etc. and this makes a difference in fit among different brands on a given size. The foot fitted in the morning will be smaller than the foot fitted in the afternoon. Toe shape of the shoe may influence the fit. Shoes with narrower toes may need to be worn a half size longer (when available). Discussion The concept of shoe fit is largely a subjective and person al matter on the part of the fitter or the customer or both. Size alone is not the only determining factor. Research form the Battelle Institute has shown there are at least 38 individual factors influencing or involved in shoe fit.

Many of the 38 factors were subjective involving the opinion and attitudes of consumer and fitter alike. In the end it was the customer who determined whether the shoe fitted or not. References Hughes JR (1995) Footwear assessment In Merrimen LM, & Tollafield DR (eds) Assessment of the lower limb Ediburgh:Churchill Livingstone 227-247. Lord M & Pratt DJ Foot therapy In Tollafield DR & Merriman LM (eds) Clinical skills in treating the foot Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone 249-266. McPhoil TG 1988 Footwear Physical Therapy 68:12 1857-1865. Rossi WA 1993 The sex life of the foot and shoe Malabar: Kreiger Publishing Company. Rossi WA 2000 The complete footwear dictionary (2nd edition) Malabar: Kreiger Publishing Co. Vass L & Molnar M 1999 Handmade shoes for men Cologne: Konemann.

Further Reading Belanger R 1997 Big black boots: how to pick the right size Byrne M Curran MJ 1998 The development and use of a footwear assessment score in comparing the fit of children’s shoes The Foot 8 215-218. Ceeny E The form of the foot in relation to footwear The Chiropodist 304-311. Foot Fitter Genovation Gardener R 1856 The illustrated handbook of the foot London Ledger FE 1985 Put your foot down: A treatise on the history of shoes Melksham: Coin Velton. Manning JR 1966 Size standardisation: Europoint The Chiropodist 21:6 187-200. Mondopoint: A metric system of shoe sizing and marking Australian Podiatrist August 1976 102-103.

Petrus Camper (1722-1789) on the Shoe translated by Dr Miriam Meijer, Mongomery College, USA The Brannock Device The true story of shoe sizes New York: Sterlinglast Corp 1977 Like this:

Question: What old English unit equalling inch (8.46 mm) is the base for the English and the US shoe sizing system?
Answer: Barleycorn