The Ruby / Oswald / Kennedy Betrayal (part 1/2) - YouTube The Ruby / Oswald / Kennedy Betrayal (part 1/2) Want to watch this again later? Sign in to add this video to a playlist. Need to report the video? Sign in to report inappropriate content. The interactive transcript could not be loaded. Loading... Rating is available when the video has been rented. This feature is not available right now. Please try again later. Uploaded on Dec 18, 2008 Jack Ruby shot and killed Lee Harvey Oswald, accused assassin of president John F. Kennedy, on 24 November 1963. Ruby, a Dallas nightclub owner with several minor arrests on his police record, fired his handgun as Oswald was being transferred in the basement garage of Dallas police headquarters; the killing was broadcast on live TV. Ruby was arrested, tried, and sent to prison; he died there of cancer in 1967. ______________________________________________ "The Warren Commission" The President's Commission on the Assassination of President Kennedy, known unofficially as The Warren Commission, was established on November 29, 1963, by Lyndon B.

Johnson to investigate the assassination of U.S. President John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963. Their 888-page final report was presented to President Johnson on September 24, 1964 and made public three days later. It concluded that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in the killing of Kennedy and the wounding of Texas Gov. John Connally. The Commission's findings have since proven controversial, and have been both challenged and reaffirmed. The Commission took its unofficial name—the Warren Commission—from its chairman, Chief Justice of the United States Earl Warren.

Source: Former stripper says that nightclub owner Jack Ruby shot JFK's assassin 'because he had the opportunity' and he just did what 'a lot of people wanted to do' | Daily Mail Online Former stripper says that nightclub owner Jack Ruby shot JFK's assassin 'because he had the opportunity' and he just did what 'a lot of people wanted to do' Nightclub owner Jack Ruby shot Kennedy assassin Lee Harvey Oswald two days after Oswald shot the President Many thought that Ruby was part of a cover-up conspiracy to stop Oswald from talking about who 'hired' him to kill the President A striptease dancer at one of Ruby's nightclubs has now spoken out saying that he did not have a plan to kill Oswald stumbleupon Email Comment The first television station began broadcasting in 1929. By 1960, nine out of 10 U.S. households had a black and white TV set, and by 1972 half the country was watching television in color. From its infancy, when audiences became captivated by television’s many firsts in broadcasting through to today the airing of iconic images have become a integral part of our lives.

From assassinations to royal weddings; from natural disasters to acts of terrorism all of it has been covered live on television. The power of the medium to educate remains as strong today as at its beginnings. Watching historical events unfold before us in the form of breaking news or telecasts of events as they happen live on that screen has been for many the way we learned firsthand of them. We sit glued to that set waiting to see what will transpire next. There is no question that television is a part of that which shapes our culture. Even if you were not around to see some of these when they occurred, all are major memorable historical happenings which are well known. Here are ten which unfolded live on television screens around the world. 10 . President Richard M. Nixon Resigns -1974 History was once again recorded live on television, when the only U.S. President ever to do so, Richard M. Nixon resigned office. This was watched by millions of people around the world. The cover-up following a break-in at the Democratic campaign headquarters in the Watergate hotel in Washington, DC was such a small story that it didn’t even jeopardize Nixon’s re-election in November of 1972.

But by the following year, the Watergate hearings — broadcast daily on by the networks — made it clear that the conspiracy extended all the way to the Oval Office. Advisers were dismissed, prosecutors were fired, and Congress prepared for impeachment. Rather than face that humiliation, Nixon went on television on August 8, 1974 and gave a 16-minute speech in which he resigned the presidency. The following afternoon, he bid farewell to his staff and departed via the presidential helicopter, posing one more time for photographers and TV cameras, a smile on his face, his arms raised with his hands in a V-for-victory pose. It was an appropriately surreal farewell, and an apt conclusion to a political soap opera that riveted the nation for over a year. 9. OJ Simpson Car Chase to Verdict — 1994-1996 Los Angeles is best known for creating some of television’s most memorable moments in their many studios also brought television viewers some rather surreal, yet very real drama in June of 1994, when former football player turned actor O.J. Simpson suspected of brutally murdering his ex-wife and her friend.

Armed with a warrant for Simpson’s arrest, police went to his home but he had fled with a friend in his now infamous white Ford Bronco. A nearly two-hour, slow and rolling car chase ensued all over the Los Angeles area freeways until Simpson returned to his home and was taken into custody. The entire event was captured by more than a dozen news helicopters and was broadcast live on television. It was seen by an estimated 95 million people. As if the car chase was not bizarre enough, the trial of O.J. Simpson for the vicious murders was equally as strange. From the bloody glove and his oddly disheveled houseguest, Kato Kaelin to the high-powered defense attorneys and obviously overmatched prosecution, viewers were glued to their screen for weeks as they watched the latest “Trial of the Century.” If the car chase was bizarre, the trial of Simpson for the vicious murders was equally strange. From the bloody glove and the disheveled houseguest to the high-powered defense and overmatched prosecution, viewers were glued to their TV sets for weeks as they watched the latest “Trial of the Century.” 8. The Fall of the Berlin Wall – 1989 “Mr.

Gorbachev, tear down this wall,” commanded then U.S. President Ronald Reagan in June of 1987. Two years later the job was done. Gorbachev’s radical notions changed the thinking in the Eastern Bloc, and in 1989, after months of protests, the East German government unexpectedly opened up the lines of free travel between East and West Germany. Citizens flooded, creating such a rampage that police stopped bothering to check their documents. On the night of November 10, 1989, the first concrete slab was removed; while the official removal took place, people all along the wall chipped away at the concrete which stood as a symbol of separation and tyranny. And television cameras captured it all. This even attracted an audience of two million 7. Royal Weddings: Charles and Diana -1981/William and Kate – 2011 The wedding of Prince Charles to Lady Diana Spencer attracted an estimated global live television audience of 750 million viewers, the most popular live program ever broadcast. On July 29, 1981, when Lady Diana Spencer married Prince Charles at St.

Paul’s Cathedral in an opulent spectacle of a ceremony, nearly three-quarters of a billion people watched it on television, many getting up in the middle of the night just to do so. It was a lavish introduction for “the People’s Princess”; 16 years later, people around the world would again turn to their televisions, this time to mourn her untimely death in an automobile accident. The wedding of Prince William and Catherine Middleton took place April 29,2011 at Westminster Abbey in London. The groom, Prince William, Duke of Cambridge, is the eldest son of Charles, Prince of Wales and Diana, Princess of Wales. The ceremony was viewed live by tens of millions around the world, including 72 million on the YouTube Royal Channel In the United Kingdom, television audiences peaked at 26.3 million viewers, with a total of 36.7 million watching part of the coverage. 6. Apollo 11 Moon Landing – 1969 On July 20 1969, millions of people around the globe sat glued to their TV sets in anticipation of the Apollo 11 moon landing. In fact it is estimated that 500 million people worldwide watched this event.

This was a first and anything could happen, even perhaps go awry. As the lunar module detached from the spaceship, they sighed with relief when it touched down and were captivated by the images of the astronauts emerging from the capsule and planting a flag on the surface of the moon. People listened as they heard Neil Armstrong say from a distance of hundreds of thousands of miles, “That’s one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind.” While no one truly knew what the outcome of the mission would be, it was clear that landing on the moon would establish the United States as the front-runner in the space race, and that television could effectively send that message to the world. The event was called, “the greatest show in the history of television” and the astronauts followed a precise script calling for Armstrong to descend the ladder, stop on the third rung from the bottom, open a storage bay containing a television camera and continue down to the moon’s surface. Buzz Aldrin followed behind with another camera to film the landscape. The breathtaking images captured by those cameras were shared with the world. To the wonder and amazement of people across the universe, television allowed them to witness humanity’s greatest achievement of the time. 5.

Lee Harvey Oswald shot and killed – 1963 On November 24th in the basement of the Dallas police station, Lee Harvey Oswald, the alleged assassin of President John F. Kennedy, is shot to death by Jack Ruby, a Dallas nightclub owner. Oswald was brought to the basement of the station on his way to a more secure country jail. A crowd of police and press with live television cameras had gathered to witness and broadcast his departure. As Oswald came into the room, Jack Ruby emerged from the crowd and fatally wounded him with a single shot from a concealed revolver as television cameras and thus the world witnessed the murder live. Ruby claimed that rage at Kennedy’s murder was the motive for his action. Some called him a hero, but he was nonetheless charged with first-degree murder. It was seen live by 180,000,000 viewers who watched from JFK’s assassination to his funeral. 4. Princess Diana and Michael Jackson – funerals Princess Diana Funeral – September 6 1997 The public funeral of Diana, Princess of Wales started at 9:08 am in London, when the funeral cortege left from Kensington Palace .

The coffin was carried from the palace on a gun carriage , along Hyde Park to St. James’ Palace , where Diana’s body had remained for five days before being taken to Kensington Palace. The Union Flag on top of the palace was lowered to half mast. The official ceremony was held at Westminster Abbey in London and finished at the resting place in Althorp . Two thousand people attended the ceremony in Westminster Abbey. An estimated 2.5 billion people around the globe tuned in to live television broadcasts of the funeral of Diana, Princess of Wales, who died at the age of 36 in a car crash in Paris. Michael Jackson – September 3, 2009 Services for Michael Jackson were to begin at 7pm but were delayed. The pop star’s brothers carried the King Of Pop’s coffin from the hearse to the marble crypt at the Forest Lawn Great Mausoleum. The Jackson brothers paid tribute to their brother wearing silver gloves and black arm bands. Nearly 200 of Jackson’s closest friends and family members tried their best to say goodbye to the entertainer at Forest Lawn Memorial Park in Glendale, CA.

Reclusive screen star Elizabeth Taylor might have been speaking on behalf of all of Michael Jackson’s fans when she emotionally lamented the loss of her longtime friend. “We shouldn’t have to be here,” Taylor told fellow mourners which included Lisa Marie Presley, Stevie Wonder, Gladys Knight, Macaulay Culkin, Corey Feldman, Mila Kunis and Barry Bonds among others. Some 31.1 million people watched the Michael Jackson memorial and funeral on television, with millions more catching video streams on their computers. 3. President Barak Obama first inauguration – January 20, 2009 The first inauguration of Barack Obama as the 44th President of the United States set a record attendance for any event held in Washington, D.C., marked the start of the first four-year term of Barack Obama as President and Joe Biden as Vice President. It was among the most-observed events ever by a global audience–37.8 million people watched the nation’s first black president take office in 2009. “A New Birth of Freedom”, a phrase from the Gettysburg Address , served as the inaugural theme to commemorate the 200th anniversary of the birth year of Abraham Lincoln .

In his speeches to the crowds, Obama referred to ideals expressed by Lincoln about renewal, continuity and national unity. Obama mentioned these ideals in his speech to stress the need for shared sacrifice and a new sense of responsibility to answer America’s challenges at home and abroad. The Presidential Inaugural Committee increased its outreach to ordinary citizens to encourage greater participation in inaugural events compared with participation in recent past inaugurations. For the first time, the committee opened the entire length of the National Mall as the public viewing area for the swearing-in ceremony, breaking with the tradition of past inaugurations. Selected American citizens participated in the train tour and other inaugural events, and a philanthropist organized a People’s Inaugural Ball for disadvantaged people who otherwise would be unable to afford to attend the inaugural festivities. 2. Hurricane Katrina – 2005 Breaking news dominated the airwaves in August of 2005, when Katrina hit the Gulf Coast. For days, meteorologists tracked the storm, which formed in the Atlantic and seemed headed to the coast of the Gulf of Mexico. This time people were prepared — or so they thought. Hundreds of reporters were on hand, covering the storm and its damage.

They braved the wind and rain as they reported on the strength of the hurricane, and when it passed they prepared to leave. In New Orleans, however, they soon discovered their job was just beginning; the levees built to protect the city broke and there were new, unexpected stories to tell. As days passed and conditions worsened, television continued to send images of death and destruction to the world. Millions of viewers worldwide watched helplessly as cameras captured images of people clinging to the roofs of their houses trying to escape the rising water, and bodies on the ground were covered as respectfully as possible. Many otherwise stoic reporters could not hide their emotion and pleaded with the government for help on behalf of the people of Mississippi and Louisiana. They showed the horrific images, which eventually prompted greater action on the part of local, state and national leaders. But sadly for many people it was too late. 1. September 11 Terrorist Attacks – 2001 Who does not remember where they were and exactly what they were doing when new of the September 11 terrorist attacks unfolded live on television? It was a perfect September morning, and television networks were wrapping up their final hour of morning programming.

NBC’s “Today Show” planned to air a piece on Howard Hughes and “Good Morning America” had an interview with Princess Sarah Ferguson about weight loss. Suddenly, news anchors received word and live feeds of New York City’s World Trade Center having been hit by an airplane. At first everyone watching thought, it was a terrible accident. Immediately, morning television personalities and news reporters were thrust into the role of reporting an unfolding news event with no idea what had happened or what would happen next. Then a second plane hit the second tower and anchors and viewers alike knew it was no accident, but instead an insidious act of terrorism. People across the nation and the world rushed to their televisions and watched for hours as reporters and anchors in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania reported tragic news that seemed to get worse by the minute. For days, millions of viewers worldwide were both riveted and emotionally drained by the developing news and stories of the victims and the heroes. 63 Shares Did Lee Harvey Oswald Get a Fair Trial? : The JFK Assassination Go straight to: Search | Main Navigation Did Lee Harvey Oswald Get a Fair Trial?

Summary The judicial system in Dallas was notoriously unsympathetic to defendants, although this did not apply to Oswald, who was murdered long before any trial could take place. Find out more in CA $6.49 Lee Harvey Oswald, the only official suspect in the JFK assassination , did not receive any sort of trial. At about 11:25am on Sunday 24 November 1963, just two days after President Kennedy had been shot dead in Dealey Plaza, Oswald was shot dead in the basement of the Dallas police headquarters. Oswald’s murder was broadcast live on television. Unlike the identity of President Kennedy’s assassin or assassins, there is no uncertainty about Oswald’s killer. It was Jack Ruby , a nightclub owner with connections to organised crime. The Trial of Lee Harvey Oswald The nearest thing to a trial that Oswald received was his treatment by the Warren Commission and the media . The former put forward a case for the prosecution, and the latter pronounced Oswald guilty. The Reason for the Warren Commission The verdict on Oswald had been decided in Washington, for pragmatic political reasons, long before any substantial investigation of the crime had taken place.

The general public had become aware while Oswald was still alive that he had been a defector to the Soviet Union and that he had worked on behalf of the Cuban regime during the summer of 1963. This knowledge, when combined with newspaper and television reports suggesting that shots were fired from more than one direction , generated two competing conspiracy theories , each of which signified public distrust of US political institutions: Oswald had assassinated President Kennedy on behalf of the Soviet or Cuban regimes, and the US security system had failed to protect the president from this communist conspiracy. Alternatively, those regimes had been set up, presumably by elements within the US security system, to take the blame for the assassination. Washington insiders were aware of an additional piece of information, which would have prompted even more dissent among the general population had it not been kept secret for many years. It appeared that during the alleged assassin’s visit to the Soviet and Cuban diplomatic compounds in Mexico City a few weeks before the assassination, Oswald had been impersonated . It was not clear whether Oswald had had an accomplice or whether he had been impersonated without his knowledge. Either way, he was involved in a conspiracy.

Oswald’s apparent connections to the Soviet and Cuban regimes suggested that the conspiracy in Mexico City was related to the JFK assassination. A few hours after Oswald’s murder, the acting Attorney General, Nicholas Katzenbach, wrote a memo in which he summed up the result of high–level discussions, and suggested a politically acceptable solution: The public must be satisfied that Oswald was the assassin; that he did not have confederates who are still at large; and that the evidence was such that he would have been convicted at trial. … We need something to head off public speculation or Congressional hearings of the wrong sort. ( FBI HQ JFK Assassination File, 62–109060–18 ) The priority in Washington was the preservation of public trust in political institutions. Finding out who had actually killed President Kennedy was very much a secondary consideration. President Johnson set up the Warren Commission on 29 November, by which time the Commission’s conclusion was already in place: Oswald alone was guilty . “The Evidence … Is Not Very, Very Strong” On Saturday 23 November, J. Edgar Hoover had given President Johnson his opinion of the case against Oswald: This man in Dallas.

We, of course, charged him with the murder of the President. The evidence that they have at the present time is not very, very strong. … The case as it stands now isn’t strong enough to be able to get a conviction. Hoover’s comment raises an interesting question of counterfactual history: if Oswald had not been murdered, would the evidence against him really not have been strong enough to get a conviction? Would Oswald Have Received a Fair Trial? It is common knowledge that Oswald did not receive the equivalent of a fair trial from the Warren Commission. In a proper judicial setting, however, things may have been more favourable to the accused. Lee Harvey Oswald’s Hypothetical Trial For Lee Harvey Oswald to have received a fair trial, three conditions are necessary: That he had survived long enough to stand trial for the murder of President Kennedy. That he would have been properly represented and his trial properly conducted. That all of the relevant evidence would have been made available for consideration by the jury. Henry Wade and Wrongful Convictions in Dallas Killing a president was not, in 1963, a federal crime. Every murder fell under the jurisdiction of the county in which it occurred.

In the case of President Kennedy’s murder, that was Dallas County, which has acquired a particularly poor record for miscarriages of justice. In recent years, DNA analysis has brought to light a spate of wrongful convictions in Dallas County, most of them perpetrated by the regime that was in office at the time of the JFK assassination: The faulty identifications were the predictable consequences of a criminal justice system that ignored safeguards meant to protect the innocent. The files reveal a law–and–order machine that focused on securing and bolstering eyewitness testimony, regardless of the victim’s doubt or the lack of corroborating evidence. … Thirteen of the 19 wrongly convicted men were black. Eight of the 13 were misidentified by victims of another race. Police investigators and prosecutors in the cases were all white, as were many of the juries …. Police officers used suggestive lineup procedures, sometimes pressured victims to pick their suspect and then cleared the case once an identification was made. … All but five of the wrongful convictions occurred under the late District Attorney Henry Wade. … The Wade era, from 1951 to 1986, was marked by take–no–prisoner trial tactics, conviction rates that topped 90 percent and record–length punishments.

, vol.6, p.430 . Oswald, like most defendants at that time in Dallas, would probably have had to deal not only with a hostile police force but also with a judge and jury of Texan rednecks. It is far from certain that his case would have been considered objectively. Oswald’s Legal Representation All of the factors that facilitated Oswald’s mistreatment by the Warren Commission and the media would have applied also to his chances of receiving a fair trial, with one exception. It is very likely that Oswald would have received adequate legal representation. Mark Lane volunteered his services to the Warren Commission on Oswald’s behalf, and no doubt he or other competent lawyers would have done so if Oswald’s case had gone to trial. Although the Commission was able to decline Lane’s offer, there is no reason to suppose that a judge would have been able to do so. Proper legal representation for the defendant is perhaps the most significant way in which the Warren Commission differed from a trial. The Commission’s Hearings and Exhibits are full of examples of witnesses being asked leading questions and being cut off when volunteering unwanted details.

In his incisive criticism of the Warren Commission, Bertrand Russell pointed to the one–sided and secretive nature of the proceedings: If the composition of the Commission was suspect, its conduct confirmed one’s worst fears. No counsel was permitted to act for Oswald, so that cross–examination was barred. Later, under pressure, the Commission appointed the President of the American Bar Association, Walter Craig, one of the supporters of the Goldwater movement in Arizona, to represent Oswald. To my knowledge, he did not attend hearings, but satisfied himself with representation by observers. In the name of national security, the Commission’s hearings were held in secret, thereby continuing the policy which has marked the entire course of the case. This prompts my second question: If, as we are told, Oswald was the lone assassin, where is the issue of national security? , 6 September 1964, pp.6–8) What Evidence Might Have Been Available? These days, the case against Oswald is essentially that assembled by the Warren Commission. Although no significant evidence that incriminates Oswald has been found since 1964, plenty of evidence tending to exonerate Oswald has come to light.

Several important pieces of evidence which contradict the lone–assassin hypothesis were, of course, kept secret until long after any criminal trial would have taken place, such as: the Zapruder film , which is now perhaps the best–known piece of evidence in the case, but which was withheld from public view for more then ten years after the assassination; the Neutron Activation Analysis of Oswald’s paraffin casts, which suggested that Oswald had not fired a rifle on the day of the assassination; the only contemporaneous report of President Kennedy‘s autopsy, written by two FBI agents, James Sibert and Francis O’Neill , contained several observations that severely undermined the single–bullet theory ; and the ballistics tests at Edgewood Arsenal , which demonstrated that the Commission Exhibit 399 bullet could not have caused all of Governor Connally’s wounds, and which therefore implied that more than one gunman had caused the non–fatal wounds to Kennedy and Connally. Although the political pressure to blame Oswald would have applied just as much to a trial as to the Warren Commission , the transparency of a public trial would have made it much more difficult to keep exculpatory evidence secret. Would Oswald Have Been Found Guilty?

Although it is unlikely that Lee Oswald would have received a fair, objective trial, it is worth considering whether such a trial might have produced a verdict different to that handed down by the print and broadcast media . Oswald’s Guilt and the Question of Conspiracy There are three main questions about Oswald’s role in the JFK assassination: Did Oswald play an active part in the assassination? If he played an active part, did he do so alone or did he have collaborators? If Oswald did not play an active part in the assassination, what was his rifle doing on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository? The third question can be disposed of straight away. There is no plausible, innocent explanation for the presence at the scene of the crime of a rifle that could be attributed to Lee Oswald. Either he was guilty of direct involvement in the assassination, or he had been framed . The first two questions signify an important difference between the legal and political aspects of the case. From a legal point of view, the question of conspiracy is secondary to the question of Oswald’s involvement in the crime. If Oswald had played an active part in the assassination, he was guilty of a crime, no matter whether he acted alone or with others.

Even if Oswald’s role were minor, such as facilitating access to the TSBD , or carrying one of the murder weapons into the building, he would still be guilty of a crime. From a political point of view, and from the point of view of disinterested observers wishing to understand the assassination, the question of conspiracy is central: If Oswald had acted alone, the assassination can have had no political connotations beyond any ideological justifications internal to Oswald. Political institutions could have been criticised only for their failure to protect the president from an unpredictable lone nut. If Oswald had acted with others, or if he had not played any role and had been set up to take the blame, President Kennedy can only plausibly have been assassinated for political reasons . Whichever political group turned out to be responsible for the assassination, a conspiracy would have led to serious popular distrust of political institutions. Rumours of conspiracy were circulating even before Oswald’s convenient execution by Jack Ruby. It was this threat of popular discontent that forced Johnson, Katzenbach and other members of the Washington establishment to set up the Warren Commission. The Warren Commission was obliged to demonstrate two things: that Oswald had committed the crime alone, and that he had no political or ideological motive .

A prosecutor in a trial, on the other hand, would have attempted first of all to show that Oswald had played a part in the assassination. The prosecutor would not have needed to demonstrate that Oswald had acted alone. Oswald’s own attorney would no doubt have stressed Oswald’s complete innocence, and would have introduced evidence to show that he was the victim of a conspiracy. Was There a Conspiracy? These days, few people take seriously the notion that the assassination was carried out by just one person, although that notion is still the default explanation put forward by the print and broadcast media . The facts of the case make it undeniable to all but the most stubborn reactionary that there was a conspiracy of some sort: The doctors who treated President Kennedy claimed that his throat wound was the result of a shot from the front. Oswald, inside the TSBD, was behind the president during the shooting. There is a good deal of evidence from eyewitnesses in Dealey Plaza that shots came from more than one direction. Oswald’s poor marksmanship , combined with the poor condition of the rifle and the very limited amount of time available to him, demonstrated that the only credible candidate for the role of lone gunman is extremely unlikely to have been able to perform all of the shooting.

The single–bullet theory cannot be reconciled with the very strong evidence that President Kennedy’s back wound was situated lower than his throat wound, that Kennedy was sitting upright at the time he was shot in the back, and that the sixth floor of the TSBD was sixty feet or 18 metres above the road. Commission Exhibit 399 , nicknamed the ‘magic bullet,’ appears to have been inserted into evidence fraudulently. CE 399, incidentally, is one of many items whose chain of possession might have been successfully challenged in court. Beyond Reasonable Doubt It is necessary to examine the evidence against Lee Harvey Oswald and apply the level of proof required in a criminal trial. Can Oswald be shown beyond a reasonable doubt to have been actively involved in the assassination? Oswald’s Fingerprints and Palm Prints Oswald left three sets of fingerprints or palm prints at the scene of the crime: on two cardboard boxes close to the so–called sniper’s nest, and on the rifle. The palm print on the rifle shows only that the the barrel of the rifle had come into contact with Oswald’s hand at some point. It supports the claim that Oswald possessed the rifle, but does not support the claim that he had handled the rifle during the assassination.

Of the prints on the boxes, the FBI’s expert witness stated that one set was probably several days old by the time of the assassination, and the other set has a perfectly innocent explanation: Oswald’s job required him to handle book cartons on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository. If anything, the existence of only two sets of prints on the cardboard boxes by the south–east corner window suggests that those boxes had not been assembled as a ‘sniper’s nest’, and that they were no more suspicious than any of the dozens of piles of boxes elsewhere on the sixth floor. Oswald’s Location at the Time of the Assassination The most fundamental part of the prosecution’s case would have been to establish that Lee Oswald was on the sixth floor of the TSBD during the assassination. Several witnesses in Dealey Plaza noticed a gunman in one of the upper windows during the 15 minutes or so before and during the assassination. The evidence implicating Oswald is far from conclusive: One witness, Howard Brennan, described the gunman in a way that could have applied to Oswald.

Brennan, of course, came face to face with Oswald later that day at the police station and was unable to identify Oswald as the gunman, despite having seen Oswald’s photograph on television. Other witnesses gave descriptions of the gunman’s hair and clothes that did not match Oswald. Brennan too insisted that the gunman’s clothes were different from those Oswald was wearing at the police station. Carolyn Arnold , a TSBD employee, saw Oswald on either the first or second floor at about the same time as a man in the crowd outside saw a gunman on the sixth floor. The man in the crowd, incidentally, saw the gunman in the south–westernmost sixth–floor window, not the south–easternmost window where the bullet shells were discovered, and stated that the gunman was accompanied by another person, a claim corroborated by another witness in Dealey Plaza. One important piece of evidence that has not survived, but which would have been brought to public notice at a trial, is Oswald’s account of his whereabouts at the time of the assassination. During the two days between his arrest and his murder while in police custody, Oswald was questioned for a total of about eleven hours.

The Dallas police, not accustomed to being held accountable for their treatment of suspects, neglected to obtain either a tape recorder or the services of a shorthand secretary for the questioning of the man accused of murdering the president. Consequently, the extant record of Oswald’s interrogation is second–hand and incomplete. The most detailed account of Oswald’s alibi is the later recollection of Captain J.W. Fritz: “I asked him what part of the building he was in at the time the president was shot, and he said that he was having his lunch about that time on the first floor” ( Warren Report , p.600 ). Evidence from two colleagues, James Jarman and Harold Norman, substantiate Oswald’s claim to have been eating his lunch in the first–floor ‘domino room’ a few minutes before the assassination. It is inconceivable that even the Dallas police would have been satisfied with an account of what Oswald was doing at “about” the time of the assassination. A reasonable person might suspect that a more precise alibi did not survive the Dallas police’s sloppy record–keeping, and that this alibi would have undermined the convenient but poorly supported notion that Oswald had been on the sixth floor.

For an informative account of Oswald’s known movements before and after the assassination, see Howard Roffman, Presumed Guilty : How and Why the Warren Commission Framed Lee Harvey Oswald , Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1975, pp.209ff (available online at ). Did Oswald Fire a Rifle? Paraffin tests showed evidence of nitrates on Oswald’s hands, but not on his cheek. Such chemicals could have been deposited as a result of firing a gun, but could also have been the result of contact with many everyday objects, including books. An internal Warren Commission memo stated: “At best, the analysis shows that Oswald may have fired a pistol, although this is by no means certain. … There is no basis for concluding that he also fired a rifle” (Memo from Redlich to Dulles, 2 July 1964, Investigation and Evidence File, RG 272, Series 12, box 4, folder 3, National Archives). Neutron Activation Analysis proved that the sixth–floor rifle would certainly have left such deposits on the gunman’s cheek, and that Oswald’s cheek did not contain incriminating quantities of nitrates.

It is almost certain that Oswald had not fired a rifle on the day of the assassination. Did Oswald Bring the Rifle into the TSBD? Even though Oswald was not the lone assassin, he may have been the person who brought the rifle into the TSBD, for use by himself or another gunman. His only plausible opportunity to do so occurred on the morning of the assassination. Three witnesses saw him that morning. One witness claimed that Oswald had carried nothing, in contradiction to Oswald’s own statements that he had brought his lunch to work in a paper bag. The other two witnesses were adamant that Oswald had carried a package that was far too small to have contained a rifle. What Was Oswald’s Motive? Even the Warren Commission claimed that Oswald had no political or ideological motive , a conclusion supported by the fact that Oswald consistently denied killing Kennedy . Although it is not necessary in a criminal trial to demonstrate the perpetrator’s motive, the lack of a credible motive in this case would surely have been noted by the jury. What’s the Verdict? It is clear that a properly conducted trial, with an impartial jury and competent representation for the defendant, would not have resulted in a conviction.

The only item of evidence connecting Lee Harvey Oswald directly with the assassination is the rifle that was discovered on the sixth floor of the TSBD. Even this piece of evidence is far from conclusive. Oswald appears to have purchased the rifle by mail order using a pseudonym, but the patchy nature of the paperwork may have prevented the prosecution establishing this to the satisfaction of a jury. Apart from the rifle, there is nothing other than circumstantial evidence linking Oswald with the assassination. Although he was probably inside the TSBD during the shooting, he almost certainly did not fire any of the shots. The Case of the Lockerbie Bombing The closest real–life equivalent of Lee Harvey Oswald ’s hypothetical trial was perhaps the trial of Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al Megrahi, who in January 2001 was convicted of killing 270 people as a result of blowing up PanAm flight 103 over Lockerbie on 21 December 1988. There were several similarities with the Oswald case: The evidence against the defendant was weak and circumstantial. Megrahi, like Oswald, may have been employed by one or more intelligence organisations .

The motivation for Megrahi’s prosecution, and his later release, was almost certainly political. There were also several differences between the two cases: Whereas Oswald had been framed before the event, Megrahi appears to have been selected only afterwards. Megrahi had a co–defendant, who was eventually found not guilty. Megrahi had legal representation at his trial, unlike Oswald’s posthumous treatment by the Warren Commission . To maximise the chances of convicting Megrahi, his trial took place without a jury, an option that would not have been available to Oswald’s prosecutors, had the case gone to trial. For more about the Lockerbie miscarriage of justice, see: , vol.31, no.18, 24 September 2009. Mock Trials of Lee Harvey Oswald There have been several attempts to give Oswald his day in court: The Trial of Lee Harvey Oswald The first was The Trial of Lee Harvey Oswald , a film made in 1964 by the Dallas–based director Larry Buchanan, whose obituary in the included the following assessment of his oeuvre: “One quality united Mr.

Buchanan’s diverse output: It was not so much that his films were bad; they were deeply, dazzlingly, unrepentantly bad.” The title, The Trial of Lee Harvey Oswald , was also used for a two–part TV drama in 1977, with the role of Oswald played by John Pleshette. The show presented evidence and left the viewer to deliver a verdict. There have been two stage plays with the title The Trial of Lee Harvey Oswald : by Amram Ducovny and Leon Friendman, first performed in New York in 1967; by Bruce Gevirtzman, first performed in Hammond, Louisiana, in 1979. Oswald on Trial in London On Trial: Lee Harvey Oswald , a London Weekend Television production from 1986, involved an unscripted mock trial lasting 21 hours. Witnesses, lawyers and a jury were flown to London from Dallas and elsewhere. For obvious reasons, only a small proportion of those who would have testified in a genuine trial did so in London. One notable absentee was, of course, the defendant, who was represented by a cardboard cut–out.

Nevertheless, the LWT experiment provided a valuable record of the reactions under questioning of many genuine participants in the assassination story. Alas for Oswald, the jury voted to convict him. Vincent Bugliosi, the prosecutor in the mock trial, later expanded on the case for the prosecution in his book, and DVD Talk . Mock Trials in San Francisco and Dallas The American Bar Association held a mock trial of Oswald at its convention in San Francisco in 1992. The jury voted 7–5 in favour of Oswald’s guilt. The mock trial gave rise to an interesting analysis of how the jurors’ decisions were influenced by their pre–existing attitudes, and of the effectiveness of the voir dire (literally, “to see to tell”) process, in which jurors may be questioned and challenged by the judge and the attorneys. For details, see Donald E. Vinson and Peter B. Freeman, ‘Oswald Trial Illustrates Hazards of Over–Reliance on Surface Traits of Jurors in Voir Dire’, Inside Litigation , 1992 (available for download as PDF [390 KB ] at ).

Just as the London mock trial gave rise to one lone–nut book, the San Fransisco mock trial was partly responsible for Gerald Posner’s much–derided Case Closed , which borrowed a third–party analysis of Governor John Connally’s lapel flap to support its claim that Connally had, after all, been hit by the same bullet that had struck Kennedy. A few months before the fiftieth anniversary of the assassination, the Dallas Bar Association organised a mock trial in the Dallas County Court building, in which Oswald himself would probably have been tried, had Jack Ruby not intervened. The jury voted 9–3 for Oswald’s conviction. This blog provides more information about the Dallas mock trial. For the benefit of students, the Sixth–Floor Museum has produced a guide to a mock trial of Lee Oswald. The document is in PDF [308 KB], and can be downloaded from the museum’s website’s lessons plans page . Nation pauses to remember John F. Kennedy's death - CNN.com 1 of 26 Photos: John F. Kennedy: The day John F. Kennedy: The day – First lady Jacqueline Kennedy at a breakfast held by the Chamber of Commerce in Fort Worth with Vice President Lyndon B.

Johnson, left, and Kennedy. Hide Caption 2 of 26 Photos: John F. Kennedy: The day John F. Kennedy: The day – The Kennedys arrive at Love Field in Dallas on a trip to advance the upcoming 1964 campaign. Hide Caption 3 of 26 Photos: John F. Kennedy: The day John F. Kennedy: The day – About 11:45 a.m., Texas Gov. John B. Connally Jr., waving to the crowd, and the Kennedys depart Love Field for a 10-mile tour of Dallas. The President asked about the weather earlier in the day and opted not to have a top on the limousine. Hide Caption 4 of 26 Photos: John F. Kennedy: The day John F. Kennedy: The day – The Kennedys and Connallys leave Love Field with Secret Service Agent Bill Greer driving the presidential limousine. The motorcade is on the way to the Trade Mart, where Kennedy is to speak at a sold-out luncheon. Hide Caption 5 of 26 Photos: John F. Kennedy: The day John F.

Kennedy: The day – Crowds line the street as Kennedy's motorcade heads toward downtown Dallas. A group of White House staffers follows the motorcade in a bus several vehicles behind the presidential limousine. Hide Caption 6 of 26 Photos: John F. Kennedy: The day John F. Kennedy: The day – Dallas Police Officer Bobby Hargis, background, is one of four motorcycle officers assigned to Kennedy's car, which reaches Houston Street shortly before 12:30 p.m. "I thought, 'Well, we've got it made now,' " Hargis said. "And then bam! It happens." Hide Caption Photos: John F. Kennedy: The day John F. Kennedy: The day – Kennedy is seen approximately one minute before he is shot. Hide Caption 8 of 26 Photos: John F. Kennedy: The day John F. Kennedy: The day – Seen through the limousine's windshield as it proceeds along Elm Street past the Texas School Book Depository, Kennedy appears to raise his hand toward his head after being shot. The first lady holds Kennedy's forearm in an effort to aid him. Hide Caption 9 of 26 Photos: John F.

Kennedy: The day John F. Kennedy: The day – Kennedy slumps against his wife as the bullet strikes him in the head. Connally, who is wounded in the attack, begins to turn around just to the left of Jackie Kennedy. Hide Caption 10 of 26 Photos: John F. Kennedy: The day John F. Kennedy: The day – Kennedy slumps in the back seat of the car and his wife leans over to him as Secret Service Agent Clinton Hill rides on the back of the car. Hide Caption 11 of 26 Photos: John F. Kennedy: The day John F. Kennedy: The day – The limousine carrying the mortally wounded President races toward the hospital seconds after three shots are fired. Two bullets hit Kennedy and one hit Connally. Hill rides on the back of the car as the wives cover their stricken husbands. Hide Caption 12 of 26 Photos: John F. Kennedy: The day John F. Kennedy: The day – The limousine speeds along Elm Street toward the Stemmons Freeway overpass moments after shots are fired at Dealey Plaza. Hide Caption Photos: John F. Kennedy: The day John F.

Kennedy: The day – Photographers are seen running shortly after the shooting. Hide Caption 14 of 26 Photos: John F. Kennedy: The day John F. Kennedy: The day – Hurchel Jacks, Vice President Johnson's driver in the motorcade, listens with others to news accounts on the car radio outside the Parkland Hospital emergency entrance. After the shots were fired, Jacks had rerouted the vice president's car to safety. The ABC radio network broadcast the first nationwide news bulletin reporting that shots have been fired at the Kennedy motorcade. Hide Caption 15 of 26 Photos: John F. Kennedy: The day John F. Kennedy: The day – Before 1 p.m., Dr. Tom Shires, with Parkland public relations director Steve Landregan, rear, describes the President's wounds to the press. Four doctors worked on the stricken Kennedy in the emergency room. Hide Caption 16 of 26 Photos: John F. Kennedy: The day John F. Kennedy: The day – American broadcast journalist and anchorman Walter Cronkite removes his glasses and prepares to announce Kennedy's death. CBS broadcast the first nationwide TV news bulletin reporting on the shooting.

Hide Caption 17 of 26 Photos: John F. Kennedy: The day John F. Kennedy: The day – A photographer captures a New Yorker's expression of shock upon hearing the news. At 1 p.m. the 46-year-old President of the United States is declared dead, becoming the fourth U.S. president killed in office. Hide Caption 18 of 26 Photos: John F. Kennedy: The day John F. Kennedy: The day – After 2 p.m., Jacqueline Kennedy leaves Parkland Hospital with her slain husband's body. She would ride in the back with the bronze casket. "I had a feeling that if somebody had literally fired a pistol in front of her face that she would just have blinked," said Dallas Police Officer James Jennings, who helped put the casket in the hearse. Hide Caption 19 of 26 Photos: John F. Kennedy: The day John F. Kennedy: The day – The hearse carrying Kennedy's body pulls away from Parkland Hospital en route to the airport. Hide Caption 20 of 26 Photos: John F. Kennedy: The day John F.

Kennedy: The day – Lee Harvey Oswald, a 24-year-old ex-Marine, is arrested in the back of a movie theater where he fled after shooting Dallas Police Patrolman J.D. Tippit. That incident occurred approximately 45 minutes after the assassination. Hide Caption 21 of 26 Photos: John F. Kennedy: The day John F. Kennedy: The day – Vice President Lyndon Johnson takes the oath of office to become the 36th president of the United States. He is sworn in by U.S. Federal Judge Sarah T. Hughes, left, with Jacqueline Kennedy by his side on Air Force One. Hide Caption 22 of 26 Photos: John F. Kennedy: The day John F. Kennedy: The day – The casket containing the body of President Kennedy is moved to a Navy ambulance from the presidential plane. Jacqueline Kennedy and Attorney General Robert Kennedy stand behind on the elevator. Hide Caption 23 of 26 Photos: John F. Kennedy: The day John F. Kennedy: The day – Jacqueline and Robert Kennedy get into the Navy ambulance with the president's body at Andrews Air Force Base, just outside Washington.

The body of the president is taken to Bethesda Naval Hospital for an immediate autopsy. Hide Caption 24 of 26 Photos: John F. Kennedy: The day John F. Kennedy: The day – Police mug shot of Lee Harvey Oswald. He is arraigned in the slaying of Officer Tippit on November 22 and/or the murder of the president the next day. As Oswald is being transferred from the Dallas city jail to the county jail, nightclub owner Jack Ruby shoots and kills him, an event captured live on TV. Ruby is arrested immediately. Hide Caption 25 of 26 Photos: John F. Kennedy: The day John F. Kennedy: The day – A man holds up a copy of the New York World-Telegram featuring the news of the assassination. Major television and radio networks devote continuous news coverage to the events of the day, canceling all entertainment and all commercials. Many theaters, stores and businesses, including stock exchanges and government offices, are closed. Hide Caption 1 of 7 Photos: Where were you on November 22, 1963? Where were you on November 22, 1963?

– Gail Powell, 8 years old : "I do recall that I was going to the elementary school cafeteria to get lunch and I could hear a radio playing. One of the cafeteria workers was crying! I asked someone what was going on and I will never forget what I heard: 'The President has been shot.' " Hide Caption 2 of 7 Photos: Where were you on November 22, 1963? Where were you on November 22, 1963? – Kathi Cordsen, 11 years old : "I didn't know much about death, I never knew anyone that had died, it just wasn't a part of my life's experience. I started crying, thoughts of Caroline and John John raced in my head. I was embarrassed that I was crying so I ducked my head under my desk. I soon learned I wasn't the only one crying, even the boy in front of me was." Hide Caption 3 of 7 Photos: Where were you on November 22, 1963? Where were you on November 22, 1963?

– Marcia Wendorf, 13 years old : "As usual, my mind was wandering when the classroom door opened and a girl popped her head in. This was unusual, the algebra teacher didn't brook any shenanigans in her classroom. We all swiveled our gaze to the girl, who said that President Kennedy had been shot." Hide Caption 4 of 7 Photos: Where were you on November 22, 1963? Where were you on November 22, 1963? – Natalie Montanaro, 5 years old : "My parents were not ones to share adult talk with us and so the way I heard was by the newscasters. The constant airing of the 'ask not what your country can do for you' speech did leave a lasting impression." Hide Caption 5 of 7 Photos: Where were you on November 22, 1963? Where were you on November 22, 1963? – Harry Pandolfino, 9 years old : "There was a sudden crackling on the school PA system, the sound of the mic being put up against a radio. And then we heard the news.

We were all herded into the church to pray, then released early from school." Hide Caption The Ruby / Oswald / Kennedy Betrayal (part 2/2) - YouTube The Ruby / Oswald / Kennedy Betrayal (part 2/2) Want to watch this again later? Sign in to add this video to a playlist. Need to report the video? Sign in to report inappropriate content. The interactive transcript could not be loaded. Loading... Rating is available when the video has been rented. This feature is not available right now. Please try again later. Uploaded on Dec 18, 2008 Jack Ruby shot and killed Lee Harvey Oswald, accused assassin of president John F. Kennedy, on 24 November 1963. Ruby, a Dallas nightclub owner with several minor arrests on his police record, fired his handgun as Oswald was being transferred in the basement garage of Dallas police headquarters; the killing was broadcast on live TV. Ruby was arrested, tried, and sent to prison; he died there of cancer in 1967.

______________________________________________ "The Warren Commission" The President's Commission on the Assassination of President Kennedy, known unofficially as The Warren Commission, was established on November 29, 1963, by Lyndon B. Johnson to investigate the assassination of U.S. President John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963. Their 888-page final report was presented to President Johnson on September 24, 1964 and made public three days later. It concluded that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in the killing of Kennedy and the wounding of Texas Gov. John Connally. The Commission's findings have since proven controversial, and have been both challenged and reaffirmed. The Commission took its unofficial name—the Warren Commission—from its chairman, Chief Justice of the United States Earl Warren.

Source: Top 10 Horrible deaths on Live TV - Top 10 VideoTop 10 Horrible deaths on Live TV - Top 10 Video Top 10 Horrible deaths on Live TV Top10 Video Top 10 Horrible deaths on Live TV Hard to watch: Death on Live The murders of journalists in Virginia, were caught on camera broadcast team itself, is not the first time that a death was recorded live. The firefighter who fell to his death from the stands at the stadium, protester suffered a water hose kills, Ayrton Senna and the World Trade Center disaster – the people who died in front of TV cameras 10. Car Thief Location: USA Unarmed father is shot dead by cops on live TV after high-speed chase in which he lied and claimed 9. Space shuttle Columbia Explosion Location: USA The Space Shuttle Columbia disaster occurred on February 1, 2003, when Columbia disintegrated over Texas and Louisiana as it reentered Earth’s atmosphere, killing all seven crew members. During the launch of STS-107, Columbia’s 28th mission, a piece of foam insulation broke off from the Space Shuttle external tank and struck the left wing.

A few previous shuttle launches had seen minor damage from foam shedding, but some engineers suspected that the damage to Columbia was more serious. NASA managers limited the investigation, reasoning that the crew could not have fixed the problem if it had been confirmed. When Columbia reentered the atmosphere of Earth, the damage allowed hot atmospheric gases to penetrate and destroy the internal wing structure, which caused the spacecraft to become unstable and slowly break apart. 8. Space Shuttle Challenger Explosion Location: USA In 1986, viewers around the world hang their screens broadcast the Challenger Space Shuttle launch. 73 seconds after take-off ferry dramatic burst in the air, and the Challenger disaster changed the field of space exploration for all. 7 crew members were killed. 7. Texas – Oakland Shannon Stone death Location: USA In 2011, the young firefighter Shannon Stone went to watch a baseball game of his beloved team H”tkss Rangers’ with 6 year old son. When one of the players dropped a ball into the audience, Stone tried to catch him and fell to his death from the balcony. 6. Lee Harvey Oswald Assassination Location: USA Oswald was a former U.S. Marine who defected to the Soviet Union in October 1959.

He lived in the Soviet Union until June 1962, at which time he returned to the United States. Oswald was initially arrested for the murder of police officer J. D. Tippit, who was killed on a Dallas street approximately 45 minutes after President Kennedy was shot. Oswald would later be charged with the murder of President Kennedy as well but denied shooting anybody, claiming he was a patsy. Two days later, while being transferred from police headquarters to the county jail, Oswald was shot and mortally wounded by Dallas nightclub owner Jack Ruby in full view of television cameras broadcasting live. 5. Lions kill their feeding Location: India Zoo in India the lions their feeding the Lion tamer forget the gate open and the lions attack him and eat him On camera TV 4. Ayrton Senna Dead Location: Brazil Ayrton Senna da Silva 21 March 1960 – 1 May 1994) was a Brazilian racing driver who won three Formula One world championships. He was killed in an accident while leading the 1994 San Marino Grand Prix.

He was among the most dominant and successful Formula One drivers of the modern era and is considered by many as the greatest racing driver of all time. 3. Turkish protester killed by a water jet Location: Turkey In 2013 Istanbul was filled with thousands of demonstrators protesting against the government destroyed Taksim Square Park to build a mall. One demonstrator, a young man aged 22, knocked on the doors of a police car, and in response to sustained water hose slammed him into the road and killed him. 2. News Reporter & Cameraman Shot Dead On Live TV Location: USA A man who was fired from his job as a television reporter two years ago took revenge against the small-town Virginia news station by executing two of his former coworkers on live television, and then posting disturbing first-person video of the attack on social media. Viewers of WDBJ, a CBS affiliate in Moneta, Virginia, watched in horror this morning as Vester Lee Flanagan II, 41, shot dead 24-year-old reporter Alison Parker and cameraman Adam Ward, 27, on live TV as the two were filming a light-hearted segment at 6:45am.

After carrying out the shocking on-air execution, Flanagan fled and posted video of the attack on social media while also writing about his grudges against the two young journalists in a Twitter rant. 1. 11 september attack – People jumping from the building on live Location: USA The September 11 attacks (also referred to as September 11, September 11th, or 9/11) were a series of four coordinated terrorist attacks by the Islamic terrorist group al-Qaeda on the United States in New York City, New York, and Arlington County, Virginia, on the morning of Tuesday, September 11, 2001. Four passenger airliners which all departed from the U.S. East Coast to California were hijacked by 19 al-Qaeda terrorists to be flown into buildings in suicide attacks. Two of the planes, American Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight 175, were crashed into the North and South towers, respectively, of the World Trade Center complex in New York City.

Within two hours, both 110-story towers collapsed with debris and the resulting fires causing partial or complete collapse of all other buildings in the WTC complex, including the 47-story 7 World Trade Center tower, as well as significant damage to ten other large surrounding structures. A third plane, American Airlines Flight 77, was crashed into the Pentagon (the headquarters of the United States Department of Defense) in Arlington County, leading to a partial collapse in its western side. The fourth plane, United Airlines Flight 93, was targeted at Washington D.C. but crashed into a field near Shanksville, Pennsylvania, after its passengers tried to overcome the hijackers. In total, 2,996 people died in the attacks including the 245 civilians, a law enforcement officer, and the 19 terrorists aboard the four planes. It was the deadliest incident for firefighters and law enforcement officers in the history of the United States, with 343 and 72 killed respectively. The attacks also caused at least $10 billion in property and infrastructure damage. Suspicion for the attack quickly fell on al-Qaeda.

The United States responded to 9/11 by launching the War on Terror and invading Afghanistan to depose the Taliban, which had harbored al-Qaeda. Many other countries also strengthened their anti-terrorism legislation and expanded law enforcement powers. Although al-Qaeda’s leader, Osama bin Laden, initially denied any involvement, in 2004, he claimed responsibility for the attacks. Al-Qaeda and bin Laden cited U.S. support of Israel, the presence of U.S. troops in Saudi Arabia, and sanctions against Iraq as motives. Having evaded capture for almost a decade, bin Laden was located and killed by members of the U.S. military in May 2011.

Question: Broadcast on live TV, what Dallas nightclub owner shot and killed total asshat Lee Harvey Oswald?
Answer: Jack Ruby