Mutiny on the Bounty (1962) - IMDb IMDb There was an error trying to load your rating for this title. Some parts of this page won't work property. Please reload or try later. X Beta I'm Watching This! Keep track of everything you watch; tell your friends. Error Mutiny on the Bounty ( 1962 ) Unrated | In 1787, British ship Bounty leaves Portsmouth to bring a cargo of bread-fruit from Tahiti but the savage on-board conditions imposed by Captain Bligh trigger a mutiny led by officer Fletcher Christian. Directors: From $2.99 (SD) on Amazon Video ON DISC Visit our Awards Central section Related News a list of 45 titles created 23 Jul 2013 a list of 30 titles created 25 Apr 2014 a list of 30 titles created 05 May 2015 a list of 46 titles created 4 months ago a list of 30 titles created 2 months ago Title: Mutiny on the Bounty (1962) 7.2/10 Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site?

Use the HTML below. You must be a registered user to use the IMDb rating plugin. Nominated for 7 Oscars. Another 3 wins & 6 nominations. See more awards » Videos Midshipman Roger Byam joins Captain Bligh and Fletcher Christian aboard HMS Bounty for a voyage to Tahiti. Bligh proves to be a brutal tyrant and, after six pleasant months on Tahiti, ... See full summary » Director: Frank Lloyd The familiar story of Lieutenant Bligh, whose cruelty leads to a mutiny on his ship. This version follows both the efforts of Fletcher Christian to get his men beyond the reach of British ... See full summary » Director: Roger Donaldson An intelligent, articulate scholar, Harrison MacWhite, survives a hostile Senate confirmation hearing at the hands of conservatives to become ambassador to Sarkan, a southeast Asian country... See full summary » Director: George Englund The growing ambition of Julius Caesar is a source of major concern to his close friend Brutus. Cassius persuades him to participate in his plot to assassinate Caesar but they have both sorely underestimated Mark Antony. Director: Joseph L. Mankiewicz The rise and fall of Napoleon Bonaparte, Emperor of France.

Director: Henry Koster The destiny of three soldiers during World War II. The German officer Christian Diestl approves less and less of the war. Jewish-American Noah Ackerman deals with antisemitism at home and ... See full summary » Director: Edward Dmytryk Two rival motorcycle gangs terrorize a small town after one of their leaders is thrown in jail. Director: Laslo Benedek Man tries to recover a horse stolen from him by a Mexican bandit. Director: Sidney J. Furie The escape of Bubber Reeves from prison affects the inhabitants of a small Southern town. Director: Arthur Penn A US air force major in Kobe confronts his own opposition to marriages between American servicemen and Japanese women when he falls for a beautiful performer. Director: Joshua Logan A war pacifist is blackmailed to pose as an SS officer and to disable the scuttling explosives on freighter carrying rubber cargo to be captured by the Allies. Director: Bernhard Wicki The story of two gigolos who vie to see which is the best at their profession. Director: Ralph Levy Edit Storyline The Bounty leaves Portsmouth in 1787. Its destination: to sail to Tahiti and load bread-fruit.

Captain Bligh will do anything to get there as fast as possible, using any means to keep up a strict discipline. When they arrive at Tahiti, it is like a paradise for the crew, something completely different than the living hell aboard the ship. On the way back to England, officer Fletcher Christian becomes the leader of a mutiny. Written by Mattias Thuresson 8 November 1962 (USA) See more » Also Known As: Motín a bordo See more » Filming Locations: 178 min Sound Mix: 70 mm 6-Track (70 mm prints) (Westrex Recording System)| 4-Track Stereo (35mm release) (some prints)| Mono (35 mm prints) Color: Did You Know? Trivia The scene where the ship arrives in Tahiti to be rapturously greeted by the natives was filmed in exactly the same spot where the real Bounty dropped anchor in 1788. 6000 local extras were used for the sequence. See more » Goofs During the mutiny and boarding the rowing boat, Bligh is wearing a shirt, yet later in the rowing boat he wearing his blue officer's coat.

See more » Quotes Captain Bligh : I'm not leaving you Mr Christian, not ever. Go to the dirtiest little corner of the world I'll be there, right behind you, with a rope in my hand. A Superb Example of Classic Movie Making! 11 December 2001 | by diegosantti – See all my reviews Nominated for seven academy awards [1962] including Best Picture, "this spectacular movie of grandeur and intimacy, sex and humor, cruelty and nobility" (The Hollywood Reporter) stars two-time best actor winner Marlon Brando (The Godfather, On the Waterfront) as Fletcher Christian, a high-born English aristocrat and elegant gentleman turned Naval Lieutenant and able first officer, whose honor is inseparable from his humanity. Also in an impeccable performance, Trevor Howard's steely, sadistic Captain William Bligh commands by contempt, as malevolent toward his officers as to the crew he tortures. In idyllic Tahiti, exquisitely captured by Academy Award winner (Best Cinematography) Robert L. Surtees, Christian is seduced by Miamiti.

She is portrayed by "enchanting Tarita, a 19 year-old native whose swaying hips find their own varying levels of audience appreciation." (Daily Variety). "Mr. Brando's steel-spring vigor when the patience of Fletcher Christian snaps and he whiplashes into the fateful incitement of mutiny is truly electrifying." (New York Times) Complete with furious storms at sea, exotic native ceremonies, magnificent South Pacific island scenery, 6000 Tahitian extras, and a larger-than-life performance by the legendary Brando, this remake of the 1935 original Mutiny on the Bounty is one of the most exciting and visually astonishing adventures ever made. "A superb blending of direction [Lewis Milestone], photography and special effects" (Variety) this movie became an instant classic and still lives to this day as the best rendition of the re-telling of this true story. Very rich in visual imagery and complimented by a mesmerizing original music score (Bronislau Kaper), this film features some of the best dialogue and character portrayals of recent memory (too many to name here, but worthy of note is Hugh Griffith, Richard Harris, and Noel Purcell).

Truly a classic in the true sense of the word, and a must see film for all connoisseurs of fine movie making! A superb motion picture! Excellent! 20 of 25 people found this review helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes The Fate of Fletcher Christian The Fate of Fletcher Christian Thursday October Christian (Public domain image) The mutiny on the Bounty is perhaps the best known of all stories from the era of wooden ships. Fletcher Christian, the infamous officer responsible for the affair, is believed to have died on Pitcairn Island, where he and the other mutineers took refuge. Yet some say his death was faked, and he did in fact make it back to England. Today we'll point the skeptical eye at these stories, and see if we can learn for certain where Fletcher Christian made his final atonement. The basic story of the Bounty is not only well known, it's well documented and not in any meaningful doubt. In 1789, the small British naval ship left the island of Tahiti with a cargo of breadfruit plants. Three weeks later, its discontented crew, led by sailing master Fletcher Christian, mutineed against Captain William Bligh.

Bligh and the loyal crew members were set adrift in the Bounty's open launch, in which they ultimately made it to safety, and made knowledge of the mutiny public. Christian and his crew of 24 — eighteen mutineers, four loyalists who couldn't fit in Bligh's launch, and two neutral men — sought refuge for several months in some of the neighboring islands, but upon finding the natives too unfriendly, they returned briefly to Tahiti. Sixteen of the men remained there, leaving only eight aboard the Bounty; barely enough to sail her. And so, one night when the mutineers' women and some other natives happened to be on board, they set sail unexpectedly, effectively kidnapping the Tahitians. And thus was the founding population of Pitcairn Island established: eight British sailors, six Tahitian men, eleven Tahitian women, and one baby. These events are known from the accounts of the sailors who remained on Tahiti, including the four loyalists, who were either captured by or rejoined the British navy when the ship Pandora was dispatched to find them. From that point onwards, the fate of the Bounty is more thinly documented.

Fletcher Christian took his crew to Pitcairn Island because he knew from the British charts that its position was not precisely known, so they'd have a fair chance of evading capture. When they arrived, the Bounty was scuttled, both to avoid advertising their presence and to prevent anyone from leaving the island and possibly raising the alarm. We know for a fact that the Bounty was sunk because its remains have been found. Without any reasonable doubt, Fletcher Christian left Tahiti aboard a ship that went to Pitcairn Island and nowhere else. No other ship of any nation reported encountering them en route. One of the mutineers who elected to remain on Tahiti was Peter Heywood, a close friend of Christian's. Along with the others, Heywood was captured by the Pandora in 1791 and returned to England. He was court martialed and sentenced to hang; but his was a family of wealth and influence, and Heywood received a pardon. Heywood returned to service in the navy, rose through the ranks, and had a successful career as a captain. Heywood was to play a pivotal role in the theories of Christian's alleged return to England.

It was reported in 1831 by Sir John Barrow, an acquaintance of Heywood's, who detailed the following account in his book The Mutiny and Piratical Seizure of HMS Bounty: In Fore-street, Plymouth Dock, Captain Heywood found himself one day walking behind a man, whose shape had so much the appearance of Christian's, that he involuntarily quickened his pace. Both were walking very fast, and the rapid steps behind him having roused the stranger's attention, he suddenly turned his face, looked at Heywood, and immediately ran off. But the face was as much like Christian's as the back, and Heywood, exceedingly excited, ran also. Both ran as fast as they were able; but the stranger had the advantage, and, after making several short turns, disappeared. That Christian should be in England, Heywood considered as highly improbable, though not out of the scope of possibility; for at this time no account of him whatsoever had been received since they parted at Otaheite; at any rate the resemblance, the agitation, and the efforts of the stranger to elude him, were circumstances too strong not to make a deep impression on his mind.

At the moment, his first thought was to set about making some further inquiries; but on recollection of the pain and trouble such a discovery must occasion him, he considered it more prudent to let the matter drop; but the circumstance was frequently called to his memory for the remainder of his life. Although Heywood's is the only reliably documented account of anyone actually encountering Fletcher Christian in England after the mutiny, there was already something of an urban legend at the time. Barrow also wrote: About the years 1808 and 1809, a very general opinion was prevalent in the neighborhood of the lakes of Cumberland and Westmoreland, that Christian was in that part of the country, and made frequent private visits to an aunt who was living there. In 1797, eight years after news of the mutiny reached England, Samuel Taylor Coleridge wrote his poem The Rime of the Ancient Mariner, which in some circles was believed to be loosely based on the life of Fletcher Christian, prompting speculation that Christian must have been available for Coleridge to interview. Coleridge's colleague William Wordsworth had been a childhood classmate of Christian's.

When Christian was tried in absentia for the crime of piracy, he was defended by his brother, the lawyer Edward Christian, and Wordsworth joined in his defense. So well known (or at least well believed) was the association of Coleridge and Wordsworth with Christian that at least one author, C.S. Wilkinson, proposed in his book The Wake of the Bounty that the two poets might have collaborated to have somehow brought Christian back to England. No evidence of this has ever been offered, but it remains one of the most popular rumors about Christian's fate. Could the man Peter Heywood chased in Plymouth actually have been Fletcher Christian? For this to be possible, Christian would have had to have found some way of leaving Pitcairn Island after his known arrival there in 1789, and no later than when the island was visited by the American seal hunting ship Topaz in 1808. On that day , three young men who appeared to be Pacific Islanders paddled out to the Topaz in a Tahitian style canoe, and astonished its captain, Mayhew Folger, with their friendliness and perfect English.

According to Folger's logbook, the three young men invited him ashore to dine with the man they called their "father", Aleck. Aleck turned out to be an Englishman named Alexander Smith, and was the sole surviving Englishman on the island. Aleck identified himself as one of the crew of the Bounty, and gave Folger the general facts. He also explained that the six Tahitian men, whom they had kept as slaves on the island, rose up and murdered all of other mutineers, including Fletcher Christian. Aleck and the women then managed to put all six of the Tahitians to death, leaving them in the current situation.

Folger was ultimately able to deliver this report to the British navy, along with his statement of Aleck's character: ...He Immediately went to work tilling the ground so that it now produces plenty for them all and the[re] he lives very comfortably as Commander in Chief of Pitcairn's Island, all the Children of the deceased mutineers Speak tolerable English, some of them are grown to the Size of men and women, and to do them Justice I think them a very humane and hospitable people, and whatever may have been the Errors or Crimes of Smith the Mutineer in times Back, he is at present in my opinion a worthy man and may be useful to Navigators who traverse this immense ocean, such the history of Christian and his associates. Folger was satisfied that there were indeed no other Englishmen living on the island. Similar circumstances were discovered six years later in 1814 when two British ships, HMS Briton and Tagus, visited. This time the leader of the young men identified himself as Thursday October Christian, the 25-year-old son of Fletcher Christian. By Thursday's own account, his father had indeed been killed on the island.

Captain Pipon of the Tagus wrote a detailed account of their days spent on the island, and of what they learned. Alexander Smith, it turned out, was a fake name, and Aleck was actually John Adams, an Able Seaman who denied having had any part in the mutiny (contrary to what had already been learned from Captain Bligh and his loyalists). Perhaps having learned from Folger that there was no longer any great dragnet to catch the mutineers, Adams was much more forthcoming with Pipot than he had been with Folger. He showed the detailed log the islanders had kept all those years, and it included the true fates of the Englishmen and the Tahitians. Disputes over women, authority and slavery had torn the group apart, with murders having taken place on both sides. Fletcher Christian had been killed by two of the Tahitians on the island's bloodiest day in 1793 on which four of the Englishmen died. Christian was survived by his Tahitian wife Maimiti and three children: Thursday, Charles, and Mary Ann.

Thursday, the oldest, was not quite three years old when his father was killed, so Adams (and one other who had died in the interim) were the only Englishmen any of them ever really knew. Maimiti witnessed her husband's death and later recounted it in great detail. This was the true history of Pitcairn Island's colonists according to all of them who were ever asked. For Fletcher Christian to have been the man that Peter Heywood chased, he would have had to survive on the tiny Pitcairn Island undetected by his own family for 15 years, then sneak on board the Topaz, somehow persuade its captain and crew not to reveal his existence, then found his own way back to England (halfway around the world) within the year while the Topaz and its crew were held by Spanish authorites on Juan Fernandez Island for several months on an unrelated matter. Is that string of improbabilities really more likely than Heywood was simply mistaken about the identity of a man whose face he saw only once in a quick glance, and even then only in a secondhand report?

The escape of Fletcher Christian, or any other larger-than-life character from history, makes for a fine story, but not necessarily a true one. Cite this article: Dunning, B. "The Fate of Fletcher Christian." Skeptoid Podcast. Skeptoid Media, 15 Nov 2011. Web. 19 Jan 2017. < References & Further Reading Alexander, C. The Bounty: The True Story of the Mutiny on the Bounty. New York: Viking, 2003. Barrow, J. The Eventful History of the Mutiny and Piratical Seizure of H.M.S. Bounty: Its Cause and Consequences. London: John Murray, 1831. 309-310. Curry, K. New Letters of Robert Southey, Volume 1, 1792-1810. New York: Columbia University Press, 1965. 519. Pipon, P. "Capt. Pipon's Narrative of the Late Mutineers of H.M.

Ship Bounty Settled on Pitcairn's Island in the South Seas; in Sept 1814." Fateful Voyage. James Galloway, 4 Apr. 2010. Web. 10 Nov. 2011. < Wahlroos, S. Mutiny and Romance in the South Seas: A Companion to the Bounty Adventure. Topsfield: Salem House Publishers, 1989. Wilkinson, C. The Wake of the Bounty. London: Cassell, 1953. Copyright ©2017 Skeptoid Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Rights and reuse information Mutiny on the Bounty Leaves Remains of Perilous Voyage | National Underwater and Marine Agency National Underwater and Marine Agency Posted on June 1, 2012 by Ellsworth Boyd HMS Bounty Countless books and films have featured Mutiny on the Bounty, the provocative 18th century saga of a harsh captain and his rebellious crew aboard an English ship. Based on a novel by Charles Nordhoff and James Hall, the story follows the real-life mutiny led by Lt. Fletcher Christian against Capt. William Bligh on the HMS Bounty.

After setting Bligh and some of the men who remained loyal to him adrift in a 23-foot “longboat,” Christian and his followers returned to Tahiti where they had stopped to load breadfruit saplings. Their orders—signed by an admiral of the English Royal Navy—were to deliver the breadfruit to the British colony of Jamaica where it would be grown as a cheap source of food for the slaves. After sailing for 10 months across 27,000 miles of open sea, Tahiti was indeed a pleasurable paradise. When it was time to shove off, the men reluctantly left their lush environs and free love with the Tahitian women. The Bounty departed Tahiti with a cargo of 1,000 saplings, but three weeks later near the island of Tonga, the mutiny transpired. Conflict between the men stemmed from class differences between the aristocratic Christian and his ambitious ship’s master. Bligh wanted to impress his naval superiors and gain career advancement, while Christian was concerned about the well-being of the men who were subject to “inhumane treatment.” The crew had never dealt with such an ill-tempered, cynical leader with a cock-of-the-walk demeanor.

These were hardy sailors, used to being at sea for months and sometimes a year or more. But the overbearing Bligh, in an effort to reach Tahiti sooner by trying to skirt the islands off Cape Horn, South America, lost time instead. In an effort to make it up, Bligh worked the crew harder and cut their rations. Led by Christian, the mutiny succeeded with the departure of Bligh and his loyalists. After returning to Tahiti, Christian and eight of his men took some Tahitian women and set sail in search of a hideout from the British Navy. The fugitives scoured the Pacific, sailing through 8,000 miles of perilous seas before settling on Pitcairn Island. They set fire to the ship and sank it close to shore in what is now Bounty Bay. It’s been more than 10 years since the United Kingdom gave permission for tourism development on Pitcairn Island. This includes arrangements made through local officials to dive the remains of the HMS Bounty.

There’s not a lot to see, but divers who have visited the site describe it as “an epic adventure.” There are some coral-encrusted timbers, ballast stones, an anchor and a cannon scattered in shallow water. As one diver put it: “Diving the Bounty is like putting the final piece together in a puzzle that chronicles one of the most exciting seafaring tales of all time.” Pitcairn Island, located in the South Pacific halfway between New Zealand and Peru, has been called “one of the most isolated places on earth.” It’s 3,000 miles from any continent and too small for an airport. Yachts and cruise ships stop there, but only for a short time due to the lack of a safe anchorage. Ocean Voyages, Inc., Sausalito, California, is one of several travel agencies that arrange charters from French Polynesia to Pitcairn Island. About Ellsworth Boyd Ellsworth Boyd, Professor Emeritus, College of Education, Towson University, Towson, Maryland, pursues an avocation of diving and writing. He has published articles and photo's in every major dive magazine in the US., Canada, and half a dozen foreign countries.

An authority on shipwrecks, Ellsworth has received thousands of letters and e-mails from divers throughout the world who responded to his Wreck Facts column in Sport Diver Magazine. When he's not writing, or diving, Ellsworth appears as a featured speaker at maritime symposiums in Los Angeles, Houston, Chicago, Ft. Lauderdale, New York and Philadelphia. "Romance & Mystery: Sunken Treasures of the Lost Galleons," is one of his most popular talks. 38 Responses to Mutiny on the Bounty Leaves Remains of Perilous Voyage Maurice Bligh June 3, 2012 at 9:04 am Prof. Boyd, With respect, clearly you are NOT a maritime historian. Your article is a classic case of something written by someone who somewhere along the road from a bookshop or library has read a few novels, and has rehashed this fiction and presented it as if it was a true story. I’m not blaming you for being a victim, for that’s what you are.

Millions have been duped by those copy-cat novelists and what I call the Hollywood brainwashed brigade whose unashamed prejudices have completely distorted British maritime history into a legend of their own making. And you’re doing them a favor by slavishly perpetuating the myths and misconceptions they have manufactured for commercial reasons. May I take this opportunity to turn the coin over to the other face of a true story that’s taken me over forty years to research? And may I re-introduce my great-great-great-grandfather as one-and-the same man who, at the age of 32, once commanded (among fifteen ships in a long and distinguished career) the one-and-only His Majesty’s Armed Vessel (not ‘HMS’) Bounty. He was Vice-Admiral WILLIAM BLIGH, RN (Royal Navy) FRS (Fellow of the Royal Society). I’m sure you’ll agree that FRS means he was an acknowledged scientist and a celebrated, brilliant navigator/surveyor/cartographer or map-maker.

And this was only one of his talents among many that earned him the respect and admiration of his friend Lord Horatio Nelson whose bacon Bligh saved in one of the bloodiest battles (Battle of Copenhagen) that Britain ever fought during the 18th and 19th centuries. So, what actually happened in the South Seas to or aboard HMAV Bounty? It’s all accounted for in manuscript material, logs, journals, letters, the vast majority held in national archives in Britain and Australia. In nutshell, on the 28th of April, 1789, at around 5-30 in the morning, most of the crew were sound asleep as usual. The on-duty crewmen as members of the Third Watch (from 4-8 am) had control of the ship, as usual, during the months of the outward-bound and homeward-bound voyage to and from Tahiti. Notably they also had the keys to the Arms chest.

And when the ship had already passed the point of no return en route to the Straits of Torres, across virtually uncharted seas, this small gang of trusted men turned into armed pirates or ‘piratical villains’ (there’s a host of historic references to this) and they very simply and bloodlessly seized the Bounty. They were not heroic ‘mutineers’ or by dictionary definition the equivalent of civilian strikers, but opportunistic thieves intent on cutting themselves out a new life in the South Seas, with an armed ship worth several millions of dollars, stocked with the latest navigational equipment and basic supplies, plus booze, and drugs (laudanum or raw opium) to boot. As one piratical able seaman John Adams said many years later on Pitcairn Island, ‘We had no real grievance against Captain Bligh. We just wanted to return to our loved ones on Otaheite.’ Oh well, that’s alright then, is it? In other words: ‘Look, judge, the only reason we robbed the bank was because we wanted to live the lives of millionaire playboys and go cruising around the South Seas for plenty of women and sex in ‘paradise’.

The price paid for these luxuries, however, was by the majority of the ship crew members, some of whom who were held as prisoners aboard the Bounty; and not forgetting almost half of the ship’s crew and 19 men who were dumped overboard and cast adrift in an open boat just 23 foot-long. This was left near sinking at a spot over 4000 miles away from the nearest known outpost of civilization. Consequently, some shipmates paid with their lives. Then, Professor, there’s something you never mentioned about the pirates who firstly visited the island of Tubaii. There they tried to set up a base, and slaughtered over 60 Polynesian men, women and children. Then they returned to Tahiti to kidnap, rape, before setting sail and leaving more bloodshed in their wake, and more bloodshed after arriving on Pitcairn Island. Of course, you’re not alone in you omission because Hollywood and their novelist support group forgot to mention this little detail too. Your readers might ask why, one of these days? By the way, there’s no need go scuba-diving in the shallows of ‘Bounty Bay’ off Pitcairn Island.

Many have already discovered that there’s nothing there to see — despite the romantic legend that ‘the wreck of HMS Bounty can seen beneath the waves’. For in the opinion of marine archaeologist I’ve encountered en route to Pitcairn; whatever remains of an unaccounted and estimated 80% of HMAV Bounty is most likely down the depths of a mile and more of water, possibly two miles away from that rocky outcrop. It’s ironic that Pitcairn Island floats on a legend the descendants of the Bounty pirates had never heard of before the outside world arrived to rewrite their own ‘history’ into the fable they’ve become. Marks out of ten, Prof? You must try harder! Maurice Bligh June 4, 2012 at 12:21 am Maurice: This is absolutely astounding, hearng from an actual Bligh descendant. Thank you for writing. You must have the real scoop then, all the things that the history books left out and as you say, dstorted. You must have visited the archives in Britian and Australia. Tell us more please. What else is in these archives? Are there actual logs similar to the ones Capt.

Fizmer and I found while searching for pirate ships in Washingtn’s National Archives? (See my NUMA article about Searching for Pirate Ships in the National Acrchives. Are these archives in Britian and Australia, (including records of the Bounty) open for everyone to see? Or do you need a special pass or permit? Please tell us more about the details you have discovered in your research. I find this quite fascinating. I’m always interested, and so are many NUMA viewers, in the inside story of historical epics such as this. Tell us more. Thanks again. Best regards, Ellsworth Boyd Wreckmaster David Townsend June 4, 2012 at 4:20 am Professor Boyd, I really wanted to educate you to the real Vice-Admiral William Bligh (Captain of the HMAV Bounty) but I see Mr. Bligh has mentioned what needed to be stated. I will not say anything more along those lines other than to say that ‘then’ Captain Bligh’s main concern was the health of his crew. Fletcher Christian certainly was far from that. My great great great uncle, Dr.

Thomas Denman Ledward estoled his Captain in a letter home (June 6, 1788) from the Cape of Good Hope regarding how much the Captain’s concerns would be credited regarding the health of his crew by his resolution and perseverance. With a ship of only 46 men, and a two year voyage at stake, he could not afford to loose any men if he was to succeed in completing his mission. The crews health would be paramount to successfully bring the Bounty back to Jamaica and England. As a former NAUI asst.diving instructor, there is nothing to see at Pitcairn Island in ways of the remnants of the HMAV Bounty in Bounty Bay except ‘ballast stones.” and no, I’ve not dived on the Bounty. Rather, I’ve viewed many photographs that have been taken of what there is to see. I’ve done my share of wreck diving here in Southern California and to view ballast stones is nothing to get excited about. Most of what there had been to see of the Bounty was back in the 1950’s when Luis Marsden (see National Geographic Magazine ‘I found the bones of the Bounty’ 1956) recovered the Bounty’s anchor.

Since a short time after that, a few of her cannons had been found. Her rudder was found by Parkin Christian back in the 1930’s, which what is left of it is in the Fiji Museum. And as Mr. Bligh mentioned, most of the ship had slid off into deeper waters at Pitcairn which explains “why” neither of the Bounty’s two stoves have ever been found or recovered as they were on the HMS Pandora in Australia. Anchors from the Bounty are all over the world. One of which is on Pitcairn Island, the one discovered by Luis Marsden. A few of the Bounty’s cannon are in the Pitcairn Island Museum. Other artifacts from the Bounty are still under preservation treatments at the Queensland Museum in Townsville, Australia along with those of the HMS Pandora today. There is the National Archives in Kew, England which have the Bounty’s Log book (formerly known as the Public Records Office) And, yes, anyone can ‘walk in’ and research all of the Admiralty records there which include the Log of the Bounty as well as theState Library (Mitchell Library) in Australia.

Both of these places hold the ‘official documents’ pertaining the the HMAV Bounty and Admiral Bligh. No permits are required. But you must ‘register’ at Kew to research and view these documents. Photographs are permitted “by permit” of any of the ‘original documents’ at Kew. You can also check out: if one is not so inclined to go and visit the National Archives in Kew or the State Library in Australia where the related documents are to be found. David Townsend June 4, 2012 at 9:08 am Ellsworth, Thanks for your response. You can’t imagine what flak I’ve had to endure over the decades from some folks who cannot conceive that things they’ve been told about what happened on the ‘Bounty’ was as wrong as the Flat Earth legend of previous centuries. Indeed, I’ve often thought that I was born too soon in the 20th century (1943) to benefit from the technologies that have been developed to date, for example our PC’s that the young ‘un’s imagine must have been around forever.

And now, at a click, we can tap into a mass of digital scan archived manuscript material on the Bligh/Bounty subject from where the original documents are held, primarily in the New South Wales State Library, Sydney, Australia, and in the UK National Archives, Kew, Surry, England. These doorways to the truths of history are open for anyone to see, and it’s all ‘for free’ if you go there, or if you visit via the internet sometimes for a small fee. However, in my youth, I had to travel to Australia and study first-hand the contents of the NSW library during a year-and-half voyage of discovery made ‘In the wake of the Bounty’. My journey to and from the South Seas turned out to be a seafaring adventure of some 36,000 nautical miles and a west-to-east circumnavigation voyage from London to London; the port where HMAV Bounty began her fateful journey. She was originally a two-year old merchant ship named ‘Berthia’ that once sat in St. Katherine’s Dock, London, on the River Thames and close to Tower Bridge that is sometimes erroneously called ‘London Bridge’.

Returning to the ‘Bounty’ expedition, for that’s what it was in reality, I would just like to add that as far as the Royal Navy and the some politicians were concerned, the humanitarian aspects of transplanting the Breadfruit trees from Tahiti to the West Indies colonies came second to the objectives behind the surveying and charting of the terrible Straits of Torres. The British Admiralty wanted a commercial sea passage opened up between the East Indies islands and the NSW colony. Whereas others –like the Wilberforce anti-slavery movement— were fundamentally opposed the West Indies having the Breadfruit trees (and various valuable plants from the South Pacific islands) because they thought that this would perpetuate slavery. That’s why I’ve always suspected there was some undercover skulduggery afoot to sabotage the ‘Bounty’ expedition for political reasons, and never mind the intended poor people recipitants who went hungry in the West Indies meanwhile.

Notwithstanding, it was my ancestor who completed successfully both the surveying and charting of the Torres Straits, and the transplanting of the Breadfruit and other ‘produce’, in his two-ship expedition (1791-1794) as the ‘Commodore’ of HMS ‘Providence’* with the ‘Assistant’ in company, and for which he received a coveted gold medal. But that re-run of the ‘Bounty’ expedition was ignored by the supporters of the ‘Bounty’ pirates* because it proved everything they didn’t want to know; namely that William Bligh was a praised commander who did everything in his power to make the lives of his crews as safe, healthy and happy as was possible in those times of unimaginable hardships for sailors at sea. But novelists and the movie-makers had to turn him into a ‘brutal flogging tyrant’, which the archives prove he never was, and blame him for all ills of his era because how else could they ‘justify’ the brutality of what their ‘heroes’ portrayed as ‘mutineers’/strikers did to their own shipmates and the Polynesians?

[Footnote:* HMS ‘Providence’ on her next voyage under a different captain was lost in the Far East. It’s a sunken wreck that to my knowledge has never been explored. It lies intact (if it’s still in the same spot where it went down) in only 120 foot of water. It’s wasn’t a pirate ship full golden doubloons, but it did have aboard the same chronometers and instruments that admiral WB himself had used. But that’s another story to be dug out of the archives. Could make a good TV documentary though?] [Footnote: ** the real Fletcher Christian, whose family was bankrupt, had sailed under Bligh’s command among others on previous voyages before the ‘Bounty’, and like the entire ship’s crew had volunteered to sail aboard her.] Maurice Bligh. June 4, 2012 at 3:07 pm Ellsworth, An afterthought: – there’s something that might come in handy if or when you’re researching documents pertaining to British Royal Navy ships.

Perhaps some readers here may have already wondered WHY the ‘Bounty’ (contrary to hundred of books that all refer to ‘HMS Bounty’) was prefixed HMAV, as I mentioned previously. Can all those books be wrong? In essence, yes, dead wrong because in the 18th century not all RN ships were entitled to carry the prefix of His Majesty’s Ship/HMS. This was only given to vessels that were commanded by ranked Captains, as opposed to the job of captain. There are those who refer to ‘Lieutenant William Bligh’ aboard the ‘Bounty’, and that was his naval rank. But when he was aboard ship as ‘Master and Lieutenant’, he held the authority of a modern-day Lt. Commander and was always addressed as ‘Captain Bligh’. The same applies today to all ship’s commanders who can be of any rank from Warrant Officer to Admiral. Proof of this can be found, for example, in the voyages of Captain James Cook when he took his first vessel ‘Endeavour’ to the South Seas. Like Bligh he was a ranked Lieutenant, so the ship he commanded was ‘His Majesty’s Bark’ not HMS Endeavour’.

But when he returned to the South Seas on his second expedition, he had been promoted to the rank of Captain and therefore his next ship ‘Resolution’ was prefixed HMS. It can be very confusing to see ships with same given name and prefixed HMS on one voyage, and the next voyage –if listed under a different commander– prefixed ‘His Majesty’s Sloop’, ‘His Majesty’s Frigate’ etc. etc. It throws doubt on whether or not it’s a different ship entirely and because the same given name can apply to half-a-dozen ships over the centuries. Only the ship’s Muster Books and Logs will tell you who was in command and their ranks at any given time. Maurice Bligh June 5, 2012 at 2:24 pm Added footnote: I believe there may still exist in Bounty Bay, 8 of the Bounty’s 10 swivel guns. One of the swivel guns is in the Pitcairn Island Museum and the other is still undergoing preservation treatment at the Queensland Museum in Australia. Here’s why. All four of her 4lb’er’s have been recovered and accounted for along with 2 of her swivel guns.

No underwater archeological survey had ever been conducted on what remnants of the Bounty had been found. Luis Marsden was a diver and not an underwater archeologist unfortunately. And like many divers of his day and ours, this is the fartherest thing from ones mind when ‘discovering’ underwater artifacts. This holds true with the Pitcairn Islanders, for they were able to recover a ‘sizeable portion’ of the Bounty’s copper sheathing of which they used to ‘pay’ for their transportation in relocating to Tahiti when they first left Pitcairn Island in the 1840’s (not sure of the date, but before they resettled on Norfolk Island in 1858). My theory is this: When the Bounty was driven up on the rocks near the shore at Pitcairn Island by Fletcher Christian and his band of pirates, they threw overboard all of the Bounty’s cannon to ‘lighten’ the ship so as to get her as close to shore as possible to unload all that remained of value to use in establishing their new settlement.

Her cannon would have been ‘left astern’ of where she actually was floundered on the rocks near the shore ( I have watched video, both underwater and above of the Bounty’s resting spot as well as studying various underwater photos, both recent and from the 1950’s). 20th Century: Her rudder was found with a portion of the sternpost back in the 1930’s by Parkin Christian (a local Pitcairn Islander at the time). This suggest that the Bounty with the remants of her burnt hull was pounded in a back and forth motion and over a short period of time, her rudder and sternpost had broken off the hull from the pounding of the surf and the strong currents that are experienced near the shore of the Island. I feel the Bounty broke up in three sections due to the pounding surf and currents. The stern section was the first section of the ship to break up and slip back out into the depths of the outer area as the depths increase dramatically off shore.

With the stern section went one of the stoves the Bounty had in the Great Cabin which was to help keep the Breadfruit plants warm or in a sub tropical condition when sailing into northern waters and over to the Atlantic from Cape Hope. The ‘mid-section’ of the hull (20% of the total ship) which remained grounded pretty much stayed stationary throughout what remains today, with that portion of her ‘ballast stones’ scatter about. The bow of the ship which contained the main Brodie Stove used for cooking, broke off from the mid-section of the hull, driven back over the mid-section and it too then slid off into the depths, most likely not far off from the stern of the ship there in deep waters. If ‘anything’ of the 80% of the remains of the HMAV Bounty possibly exist, they will have to be discovered by professional organizations such as those who discovered and dived the Titanic in the Northern Atlantic. A shame we can only speculate on such things without actual proof. The seas all around Pitcairn Island are pretty rough most of the time. The ‘underwater surge’ where rest the ballast stones of what remains of the HMAV Bounty is very strong.

Tough, but ‘divable’ conditions. Eight swivel guns still lay out there somewhere in Bounty Bay and have yet to be discovered and recovered. David Townsend Mr. Bligh, Mr. Townsend, I do think that someone should start getting this information out into the public eye so that we may all understand what truly happened on the Bounty all those years ago. I have never really known what to believe as far as the exact events go, and the two conflicting accounts do make it hard to lend credence to either story. I have to tell you Mr. Bligh that not everybody is going to even think twice about believing your story, even I was not ready to put any thought into what you have ritten at first glance but now it does make sense that the mutineers would tell such a story to discredit the persons they stole from. Sincerly, Ethan Allen June 8, 2012 at 6:00 am Mr. Allen, Your thoughts are much appreciated from my perspective (and I also believe from that of Mr. Bligh’s) ! I work very closely with Mr. Bligh in trying to educate the public in these matters such as when I ran across Prof.

Boyd’s article here when he first published it. It can be and is a very difficult thing to do at times in educating the public. The ‘windows of opportunity’ only come from such initial postings as this one as they ‘appear’ on the Internet using a program provided by Google called “Google Alerts.” By this method we are able to respond to Internet Postings regarding the Bounty Saga when they first appear. Until such times or ‘ways’ that make it both feasible and accessible to the general public or the ‘world-at-large’, it’s virtually impossible to get to the “truth” of the Bounty Saga, when as Mr. Bligh correctly pointed out, Hollywood, Calif. distorts and twist the “truth” to sell films/movies. “Truth” does not attract movie goers nor do the “actual documents” that have been written, thus the Novelist like Nordoff and Hall write up their fictionalized versions of what occurred to make such books and films “salable” and profit making. The ‘Bounty Saga’ is not wildly known world-wide but there are many interest groups of this ‘important subject.’ Groups such as ship model builders who love building wooden models of the HMAV Bounty.

There are Internet chat groups ( I run two of them) such as (closed group, but photos can be viewed by ‘anyone’ on the Internet and anyone is invited to join, no monies involved, just free knowledge) and There are several other Yahoo Groups that also cover this subject of interest to the International Community and many Blog’s as well. Once the ‘waters have been ‘muddied’ it’s not an easy thing to ‘clear them up’ so that mankind can actually see through to the depths of the truth to appreciate the beauty of history as it “was originally written.” Mr. Bligh and myself do our part in trying to help ‘clear up’ the muddied waters. Controversy exist on this famous subject and individual perspectives are tainted in their understandings of this subject. Most people “do not study” either the original documentation or the same documentation that has been ‘transcribed’ on fatefulvoyage.com as they mainly “just take the time” to read one book and base their opinions/judgements on that one account. There are hundreds of books that deal with the “Mutiny on The Bounty” and many of them are out of print.

“If only” people would “research” and take the time to study the full spectrum that surrounds the Bounty Saga, their minds would be clear on the subject and confusion and distorted facts would be put to rest. Caroline Alexander has written a fairly new book titled ” The Bounty” which is pretty accurate and up-to-date in the presentation of the Bounty saga. Hollywood, Calif. could greatly contribute to this “if only” they wanted people to understand the “truth”. But they would not make any money in the process because the “truth” would be boring to people. I have been trying to get a few small television film companies interested here in Southern California for some time, but it’s been an ‘up-hill’ battle. My ancestor, Thomas Denman Ledward, surgeon of the HMAV Bounty was one of the few of Captain Bligh’s crew that remained both faithful to his Captain and his country throughout this ordeal. He too was forced into the Bounty’s 23′ launch to take his chances with Captain Bligh and the 17 other loyalist on that 4300 mile survival voyage to Timor, Indonesia.

But, like most of the officers of the HMAV Bounty, he too had let his Captain down at that crucial moment when Fletcher Christian and his band of pirates seized the Bounty from His Majesty’s Navy and turned it into a pirate ship, raping, pillaging and murdering men women and children both at Tubuai and Tahiti and finally each other on Pitcairn Island. Due to politics at the then period of time that this occurred, it is difficult to interest other ‘Loyalist descendants’ that we know, such as those of the surname of Fryer (John Fryer, master of the Bounty), Purcell (William Purcell, carpenter of the Bounty), Peckover ( William Peckover, gunner of the Bounty) and many others as their ancestors had falling outs with Captain Bligh during the voyage of the Bounty’s 23′ launch to Timor and Batavia. And though I’m in contact with these descendants, they too hold their ancestors in high esteem but do little to help correct the myths and distortions of the “actual facts” in educating the World Community as to the “truths” of this important historical saga. Such is life and the way of the world at present.

And because Hollywood has distorted the “truth” of the Bounty saga by making Fletcher Christian a hero and Captain Bligh a villain, people want to believe that Fletcher Christian was always the “good-guy”. Everyone loves a hero! No one loves a villain! When in “reality” Captain Bligh was the true hero and Fletcher Christian was the true villain!! As Mr. Bligh pointed out above, many here are the “victims” of knowing the “truth” as it really happened. In quoting the televised series of the X Files, “The Truth Is Out There.” May you discover it for yourself sir with all others here and world-wide. I humbly remain at your service. Sincerest Regards, correction: As Mr. Bligh pointed out above, many here are the “victims” of ‘not’ knowing the “truth” as it really happened. Maurice Bligh June 8, 2012 at 7:46 am Dear Mr Allen, Appreciate your comments, but it’s not just a case of needing to get information out into the public eye… it’s already in the public domain.

Remember though the old saying – there are none as blind as those who don’t want to see? Generations have been weaned on images that bear no resemblance to what many history books, articles, scans of historic documents can prove are the irrefutable facts and some of which I’ve illustrated previously. These can easily blow all that fictionalized Hollywood stuff, and more, out of the water. Yet long vested biased political and commercial interests would rather the truths be buried beneath a mountain of myths and misconceptions turning victims into criminals and criminals into victims. Even Marlon Brando who played Fletcher Christian in the 1962 movie ‘Mutiny on the Bounty’ knew that the rehashed story from the 1930’s novels by Nordhoff & Hall was rubbish. For in his auto-biography ‘Songs My Mother Taught Me’ (page 270) he wrote about the movie’s first director, Carol Reed, “A talented Englishman whom I admired…” “When MGM replaced him with Lewis Milestone, we were told that Carol had had an argument with the studio and quit. Later, I learned that he’d been sacked because he wanted to make Captain Bligh a hero.

In reality, Bligh was a hero, but Charles Laughton hadn’t played him that way. Since Laughton was the definitive Bligh, the studio didn’t want to revise history in the new version, which wasn’t a remake of the original but a kind of sequel that picked up where the other one left off. I had seen the 1935 version of Mutiny on the Bounty and was impressed with the performance of Charles Laughton, but not with that of Clark Gable as Fletcher Christian. He hadn’t even bothered to speak with an English accent; nor had Franchot Tone, the co-star. They made no concessions whatsoever to the fact that they were portraying British seamen and it seemed absurd. As always, Clark Gable played Clark Gable. If I had been Trevor Howard, I would never have accepted the responsibility of playing Bligh in the remake because there was only one Bligh right or wrong, historically correct or not. Laughton’s characterization renders anybody elses useless. Carol Reed wanted to be historically accurate and to depict the mutineers as pathetic as they were in life.

But the studio didn’t want it that way, and I’ve never met a studio that had the integrity to stick to the truth if it was able to make more money by distorting it, and so Reed was dumped.” Ethan W Allen June 10, 2012 at 9:38 pm Thank you Mr. Townsend, Mr. Bligh, I will have to look at those forums you both talked about and do some more research regarding the story. I also read about someone finding the remains of a planting pot in the area of Hiva Oa that dates to the time of the mutiny. Is it possible that one of the Breadfruit plants drifted that far Northeast? Only time will tell. Sincerly, Ethan Allen June 11, 2012 at 4:39 pm Mr Allen, You may have gathered from previous comments that the subject of alleged ‘relics from the Bounty’ is one that occurs with monotonous regularity. I hadn’t heard of the ‘breadfruit pot’ being allegedly washed up on Hiva Oa, one of the Marquesas Islands.

But if you think about it, the breadfruit saplings or small trees were growing in soil, soaked continuously with water, and in heavy earthenware pots (also some wooden tubs). They were dumped overboard by Christian’s pirates, and most likely they went straight down to the bottom of the sea, wouldn’t you say? Perhaps more significantly the ‘Bounty’s position at that time was off the Friendly Islands or Kingdom of Tonga, a long, long way eastwards from the Marquesas. Also the seasonal prevailing winds and sea-currents were headings in the opposite direction and along the route that the ‘Bounty’ was taking towards to the uncharted Straits of Torres. If I were you, I wouldn’t trust any 18th century looking pot or tub that someone said somebody else said came from the ‘Bounty’! Ethan W Allen June 11, 2012 at 8:13 pm Mr. Bligh, I do indeed agree about the pot and I have read about the ”suposed relics of the Bounty”.

On a different note however, I am doing some research on the many ships that have gone down off the coast of Washington state ( I live in Tacoma) and one of them was the ”HMS Condor” which sank without a trace on December 3, 1901 while on passage from Esquimalt BC to Hawaii. The ship was top-heavy and leaky even though she had just had a refit and barley three years after she was launched. A few pieces were draged up in the 1940’s but nothing else. Do you happen to have any information on the ship? Sincerly, Ethan Allen June 12, 2012 at 2:04 am Mr Allen. Alas, no info on that ill-fated ship. You’ll need to explore the National Archives at Kew and dig out whatever relevant stuff is there, I imagine, such as Board of inquest findings as to the ship’s loss, etc. Good hunting. Ethan W Allen June 12, 2012 at 8:12 pm Mr. Bligh, Thank you for the information. This is a website that I am not familiar with and I look forward to exploring it.

I am doing a report on the shipwrecks of the DuPont WA area and I am also gathering information on the sinking of the SS Pacific off Cape Flattery for a potential expedition by NUMA. But the wreck of the Condor would make an even more interesting find. Sincerly, Ethan Allen Dear Mr M.Bligh, I became in touch with the Bounty story because of the film the Mutiny of the Bounty. the Marlon Brando version. I saw the Bounty exhibition at Greenwich. Then, I bought some facsimile-logs but The log of H.M.S. Bounty was -a pity for me- sold out. Because of internet I received last friday finely after so many years this facsimile ( Genesis ) edition. Again in the middle of this story I found this website. What is fascinating me is this: After so many years the story is still living en many questions left open. Mr. Bligh, sooner or later the truth shall /will come out. The world has become very narrow through internet. And if someone is really interested in the real story, they will find your story like I did. I am looking forward to receive further information about this.

Hopefully this project shall/ will (sorry my English is not so good) wipe out the false blame which came upon your family shoulders. I am looking forward to the loyalist descendants for their contribution. A movie film is nice to see but to get knowledge from involved people is fantastic! Thank You Mr. Bligh. And of course, Thank You Mr. Townsend. Ellsworth Boyd July 22, 2012 at 1:50 am To: Ethan, David, Kuye, Victor: Many thanks for your interest in The Bounty story. And a special thanks to to Mr. Bligh who has sent in so much more info, answerng more questions, and telling the story from a different point of view than Hollywood. May the story continue and more facts revealed. Best regards, Ellsworth Boyd Wreckmaster August 2, 2012 at 6:30 pm I would like to thank Prof. Boyd for his article which, after much searching on the Internet, gave me a clear and concise summary (in layman’s language) of the tale of the “Bounty”.

I was not interested in hair-splitting details of whether the Bounty was “HMS” or “HMAV”, but of different viewpoints of what actually happened before during and after the Mutiny. I was pleased to read the opinion of Captian Bligh’s descendant who vigorously defended his ancestor and of Mr. Townsend who shed some light on his ancestor who was the Doctor on the ship. I know how facts are always shaded when history is transcribed to movies, and I am glad to hear more of the “history” of the Mutiny. However, I am reminded that we are hearing one side of the story in this case, although documents etc, are offered. I have found during my long life that “truth” usually lies somewhere in the middle and sometimes, as may be in this case, a little to the right or to the left. We may never know exactly what happened on that fateful voyage. But it is interesting in any case, to hear from all sides and to spur history buffs to continue in their search. In my case, I would not have been exposed to Mr. Bligh and Mr. Townsend’s interesting information had not Prof. Boyd written his article.

Ellsworth Boyd August 4, 2012 at 2:09 am Lois: Thank you so much for your comments. They are very insightful! “….somewhere in the middle or a little to the right or left” is a very good way to put it. You are right–it does encourage history buffs to continue to research the story. Thanks again! Best regards, Ellsworth Bob Smiley August 29, 2012 at 12:32 am Fascinating! Thank you for all this information on the history. If only we all had the time to explore all the facts that are now available. We hope that the saga will continue to be explored. Thankfully, we have Dr. Cussler to thank for helping us sort it out in his books. We love his history lessons and always come away knowing more. And thank you, Mr. Bligh and Mr. Boyd, and all those who commented. Bob Smiley September 30, 2012 at 9:24 am My 2 cents worth! I think we have to remember that Hollywood has A LOT to answer for. Hollywood screen writers can be blamed for a lot of these cases.

The movie U 571 for instance! People will always rememeber the “FACTS” of the stories if put to them in a film that they remember. After that they arent interested in looking into the storey because they already “know” what happened! Even thou its a screen writers storey of what really happened! Hell, look what happened with both of Clive Cusslers books that have made it to film, screen writers again! September 30, 2012 at 11:32 pm I agree. And Clive has some stories to tell that will confirm what you said. It seems to me that the writers always have to “Hollywood” it up when they draft their stories. Exaggerations often abound! And they don’t seem to have much of a conscience about it. So I think there is a warning here: Don’t believe everything you see and hear on the screen. If you’re truly interested in the storyline, do some of your own research on the subject. Thanks for your “two cents.” Good point made!

Charles Van Heyden March 11, 2013 at 3:02 pm In the ’62 movie, a keel-hauling was depicted, and a laying on of the cat-o-nine tail ten strokes to a sailor who had taken some cheese without authorization from the ship’s stores. How accurate was that depiction, and how often was keel-hauling utilized in the Royal Navy during that time period are my two questions. March 15, 2013 at 12:24 am Thanks for writing. It is believed that the Greeks carried out keelhauling, but some of the first written accounts are about the Dutch Navy using in the 1500s. There is one reference of it beng used in the British Royal Navy in the early 1700s. The practice was not officially condoned in the British Royal Navy. That’s not to say it wasn’t used after that, but lashes with a whip (cat ‘0 nine tails) was the preferred means of punishment ordered by the ship’s captain and/or his officers. The French Navy abolished keelhauling in the mid-1800s.

English writers (& writers from other countries) used keelhauling in their fictional plots, thus giving it further publicity. So did film productions throughout the years. Charles Van Heyden March 18, 2013 at 1:24 am Thank you Prof. Boyd (Emeritus), the cause for my question is to ascertain how callous Captain Bligh truly was if there is any truth in the depiction of the movie. That is my question now. I’ve begun studying the websites related to this blog, and reading the Bounty trilogy, but would like an answer now, a reference to logs etc., as it may take me weeks or months before I come to a resolution if I do the research. Do you know the answer? April 20, 2013 at 3:43 pm I seem to have answered adequately for myself my question: How callous was Captain Bligh? Don’t people have two sides? Doesn’t a German father both love and harshly discipline his children? Doesn’t a person have a mean streak in him at times, a cruel impulse we could call it?

If a captain of a sailing vessel in the days of sheeted frigates wanted to get rid of a “bad” sailor all he had to do is put him ashore on a island where there were cannibals. Bill August 14, 2013 at 11:22 pm I fully understand the urge of descendents of controversial historic figures to correct a simplified, cartoonish version of their relation. After much reading and research, my theory is that Lt. Bligh was one of history’s finest sailors, but may at times have had personality flaws … and combined with the other personalities of the Bounty, its unique circumstances and the civilian-military nature of the mission, things turned out poorly for all involved. My feeling is there are not pure heroes in this story, certainly not the black/white hat Hollywood variety. Human beings are complex characters. Bligh may have been, on occasion, a petty tyrant under strain. We will never know the truth. Historic records are useful, but they are one side of a story with endless sides. In the end, it’s one of humankind’s most fascinating tales.

August 15, 2013 at 2:48 pm I agree with you. I think there was a lot more to this story than what was portrayed in all of the Hollywood movies. Also, a captain should be able to spot the ring leader and get rid of him. Hollywood always loves the theme of the “bad guys” versus the “good guys” and thus made the mutineers the heroes. When personalities clash, resolutions are made on both sides, some okay, others not so good. When the mutineers made their decision, it totally changed their lives and environment: Civilization versus a small island in the middle of the ocean! I wonder how many of them regretted it as the years passed? Thanks for writing. E.B. Chris Cowley February 1, 2014 at 2:29 am Dear Prof Boyd Some very interesting responses to what did not appear to be such an inflammatory article!

Whilst I sympathize with Mr Bligh and Mr Townsends direct descendants I think it is is clear from the documents I have researched, yes both in Australia and Kew, having lived in Oz for 14 years and being a WW1 buff (researching at Kew) that Bligh was indeed a Master Navigator with some advanced ideas on crew well-being, three watches and exercise programmes. It must also be acknowledged that a great deal of evidence also exists from the testimony, journals and logs of both mutineers and loyalists that Mr Bligh had severe temper problems. One instance of this was when he accused all his officers and Christian directly of theft of coconuts from the on-deck store. To a Gentleman this was tantamount to a challenge to dual and I have no doubt had they been on land and not in the Navy one could easily have resulted . It must also be remembered that accusations of his temper dogged his whole career both prior to and post the mutiny and he has the unwanted accolade of being probably the most mutinied officer in the Navy having been involved in 3, if you include the Rum Mutiny, when he was the Governor General of NSW Australia .

Reading Mr Blighs account of the mutiny is fascinating,as is his log,but as much for what according to the others, he chooses to leave out. Selective reading and quoting will distort the story, calling the mutineers pirates when even Bligh refers to them as mutineers is emotive and unhelpful. We can never really know the truth and we choose to believe what we choose to believe. I feel very content that through my own unbiased research I believe that Mr Bligh was a magnificent navigator, cartographer and learned fellow with a very bad and sometimes diabolical temper that got him into trouble on more than one occasion. Thank you for prompting this fascinating debate Yours sincerely March 19, 2014 at 9:36 pm You made some excellent points. Yes, there’s always two sides to every story. Your point about Capt. Bligh being involved in three mutinies is provocative. He seems to have had a bad temper, but was a great navigator. It was a tough decision the mutineers made–they knew they were giving up everything back home. Continue your research. It is quite interesting. E.

Capt Brian Fulford /retired August 30, 2014 at 4:32 pm I have read many stories /yarns about the Bounty mutiny but my interest now is getting the line drawings and rig of the 23ft open boat that Bligh an his crew were cast a drift on …any info will help me I am sure Thank you God Bless the Queen/king 954 463 2474 Florida USA Capt Brian Fulford /retired September 14, 2014 at 2:12 pm I have read many books and articles about the mutiny and the trip to Timor in the 23ft boat. Friends and I have talked about this subject for years .. does anyone consider that Christian and Bligh were in a homosexual relationship and fell out with each other ..when Christian had a affair with a female island lady?? you know what they say ..a women scorned……………….

Nicholas ten Kleij April 18, 2015 at 3:41 pm I have just read the article and all the replies with a great deal of interest and I agree that it is high time that the true character of my great-great-great-great-uncle William Bligh became more public knowlege. If he had indeed been the cause of the infamous mutiny the Admiralty would {probably} never have seen fit to promote him to Captain, and eventually to Rear-Admiral. Nick ten Kleij HMS Bounty, Capt. Bligh's ship H.M.S. BountyKit The bloodless mutiny led by Fletcher Christian against Captain Bligh has made the Bounty’s story one of the most famous sea tales of all time. In December 1787 the Bounty set out with a crew of 46 volenteers from Spithead England enroute to Tahiti, to collect breadfruit trees. Then to deliver her precious cargo to the Caribbean. On the homeward bound voyage from Tahiti, the crew mutinied. The first mate, Fletcher Christian and the mutineers forced Bligh into the ship's launch with the remaining 18 loyal seaman.

Together the crew and Captain Bligh set out in an open boat with only five days worth of rations. After 40 days on the open sea they reached Timor and could then return to England. Bligh’s navigational skills during this perilous voyage were a remarkable feat never equalled to this day. The mutineers returned to Tahiti, where about half of them settled, while the rest continued to Pitcairn Island where they set fire and sunk the Bounty. Today their fair haired descendants still live. Bligh was apointed Captian of another ship, only to be again ousted in 1797. Instructions: Check items you wish to purchase & then click the "Submit" button at the bottom of the page. #139-001-8 HMS BOUNTY

Question: What ship was the subject of the mutiny led by Fletcher Christian against Capt. William Bligh.
Answer: HMS Bounty