Counties of England Counties in England Exploring the counties of England with history and pictures. The history of the counties of England dates back to early Anglo-Saxon times when âshiresâ were first formed as a way of raising taxes and when the nation of England was first created. These Anglo-Saxon shires usually had a fortified town at the centre, known back then as the âshire townâ. The word âCountyâ came later, being first introduced by the Normans when they conquered England back in 1066 and has its origins in French, simply meaning a jurisdiction under the sovereignty of a âCountâ. The words âcountyâ and âcountiesâ therefore are derived from French (from the Normans) but most of the county names themselves still kept (and retain today) their original Anglo-Saxon names, such as âWorcestershireâ or âBedfordshireâ which is simply the name of the shire or county town, with the suffix of shire.

There are other counties however that got their name differently, such as Cornwall, and Devon, both of which take their names from the Celtic tribes that inhabited the regions, such as the âCornoviiâ in Cornwall . Other exceptions include todays Kent, which derives from the Kingdom of Kent, and Sussex (both East and West) and Essex. These names derive from the East Saxons (Essex) and the South Saxons (Sussex). The county names of Norfolk and Suffolk, derive from the âNorth Folkâ and âSouth Folkâ of the ancient Kingdom of East Anglia. Each county link below will take you to the main county page where we list all the wonderful historic towns, villages and attractions that each county has to offer. You will also find a Picture Tour for each county, offering a diverse selection of the wonderful towns, attractions and varying landscapes. We hope you enjoy viewing the beautiful counties of England..

The baffling map of England's counties - BBC News BBC News The baffling map of England's counties By Jon Kelly BBC News Magazine 25 April 2014 Close share panel Image copyright Alamy Signs marking traditional English county boundaries are due to return, but the distinction between historic and administrative divisions can be hugely confusing. Do you know which county you live in? Are you sure? Is that a historic or a ceremonial council or a county council or some combination thereof? Many people's sense of self is bound up in a fierce local pride about their county. But it isn't always clear exactly which is the relevant one. People in Scunthorpe lived in the non-metropolitan and ceremonial county of Humberside from 1974 to 1996. Now they live in the ceremonial county of Lincolnshire and the unitary authority of North Lincolnshire. Humberside no longer exists as a county but Humberside Police and Humberside Fire and Rescue Service still do. If you're in Birkenhead, you are in the historic county of Cheshire, the ceremonial county of Merseyside (although Merseyside County Council was abolished in 1986) and the Metropolitan Borough of Wirral.

Image copyright Dept of communities and local government Image caption Maps showing how ceremonial (left) and historic (centre) counties overlap (right) Middlesex dates back to the 8th Century but Middlesex County Council was abolished in 1965. Middlesex County Cricket Club and Middlesex University live on. So too does the historic county of Middlesex even though most of its inhabitants now live in the ceremonial county of Greater London. Still following? England's counties are the source of much regional pride, not least on cricket pavilions. To identify as a Yorkshirewoman or a Devonian or a Northumbrian is to invite certain expectations about the forthrightness of one's views or one's tolerance for cider and clog-dancing. Image copyright bojangles / Alamy But successive waves of local government reform have left many people deeply unclear as to which county they live in - the answer to which depends on exactly what you mean by the word "county". Now, in an effort to support the "tapestry" of ancient place names, the government has changed its rules allowing councils to put up boundary signs marking traditional English counties - including the likes of Cumberland and Huntingdonshire, names which no longer have any connection to county-wide local authorities.

"Previous governments have tried to wipe the counties off the map, imposing bland administrative structures or alien euro-regions," Communities Secretary Eric Pickles said as he announced the change. But "we are stronger as a nation when we cherish and champion our local and traditional ties", he added. The move has been welcomed by the Association of British Counties (ABC), which promotes awareness of the UK's 92 historic counties. It's unlikely, however, to clear up what the ABC calls "county confusion" . There are, in fact, three types of counties in England. Counties of different variety may share the same names as each other but not necessarily the same borders. First there are the historic counties, which date as far back as the mid-Saxon period. Some, like Westmorland, no longer exist in an administrative sense. But especially in places like Yorkshire, Durham and Cornwall, they are important expressions of geographic and cultural identity. Then there are administrative counties and unitary authority areas created by the 1972 Local Government Act. These include non-metropolitan county councils like Oxfordshire and Surrey (where some services are also provided by districts). Others, like Northumberland, are single-tier unitary councils.

Some areas like Berkshire have no county council and the districts are the sole local authorities. And finally there are the ceremonial counties, established by the 1997 Lieutenancies Act, each of which has a Lord Lieutenant. Bedfordshire and Cheshire, for instance, do not exist as councils but do as ceremonial counties. In metropolitan counties like Merseyside, Tyne and Wear and Greater Manchester, county councils were scrapped in the 1980s, but some services including transport and the police are run jointly by groups of councillors within the old boundaries. If you've followed that, well done. Catherine Staite, director of the Institute of Local Government at Birmingham University, says there was no consistency to the way these overlapping boundaries were drawn. "We've ended up with a patchwork of arrangements for which there is no logic." So, for instance, Barrow-In-Furness belongs to the historic county of Lancashire. Its ceremonial county is Cumbria. It is governed by Cumbria County Council, which also covers the historic counties of Cumberland and Westmorland. Then there is Saddleworth, formerly of the West Riding of Yorkshire and now of the Metropolitan Borough of Oldham and the ceremonial county of Greater Manchester.

Many of its inhabitants still proudly fly the white rose flag. In an effort to clear up the confusion - and, it says, champion England's local identities - the government is publishing an online interactive map of county boundaries and how they overlap. The situation is less confusing in Scotland and Wales, where local government is single tier, though some councils like Clackmannanshire and Fife do correspond to historic counties. In Northern Ireland, which has 26 district councils, inhabitants of counties Armagh, Antrim and Fermanagh will identify themselves as such. According to Andy Strangeway, a campaigner for greater recognition of England's counties, more of the historic East Riding of Yorkshire is outside the current East Riding of Yorkshire unitary council area than within it. This, he says, amounts to "cultural vandalism". Counties have been neglected, he believes, because they matter more to those who don't belong to the metropolitan elite. "The further you get away from the M25, the more important counties become," he says. "It's in places like Yorkshire, Cornwall and Durham that they matter most." There have been setbacks for supporters of the counties.

In 2010, the Royal Mail deleted county names from its Postcode Address File database, which lists every address in the UK. But the movement for greater recognition of these historic boundaries has reason to feel confident that its cause is on the march. Rutland, constituted as a district of Leicestershire in 1974, was re-established as a county in its own right in 1997. Cricket teams and BBC local radio stations all keep the names of counties alive. Some, including Staite, are sceptical about the wisdom of how far this can be taken. "Are you going to go back to the Wapentakes?" she says. But Strangeway says the counties will linger on in the popular imagination regardless. "No-one is loyal to the people who empty their bins - they'll be here today and gone tomorrow," he says. "The counties are part of our cultural heritage." Perhaps it doesn't matter if you can't make sense of them at all. Follow @BBCNewsMagazine on Twitter and on Facebook English Counties, Parish, etc.

for Genealogists Introduction I have noticed that genealogy mailing lists, at least those I subscribe to, frequently receive requests for an explanation of aspects of the English local government system as it affects genealogists. Questions such &QUOT;What is the difference between a shire and a county?&QUOT or &QUOT;A document I consulted says this village is in county A, but my map/gazetteer says it is in county B, which is right?&QUOT;, and less frequently people want to know what is meant by a hundred or a poor law union. This page is intended to help to answer such questions, showing how the system originated and how it has changed over the centuries. It also contains some explanation of other units of local government and types of settlement, mainly for the period prior to the reorganisation of 1974. Specific counties, etc,. will be mentioned only by way of examples, partly to keep this page to a reasonable size and partly because I simply don't know all the details of the changes in names and boundaries that have taken place. Where I become aware of them I will point to other sources of such detailed information.

If you know of such sources, or if you find any errors on this page, or would like it expanded to include some additional related material, please let me know . Origins of the counties During much of what we call the Saxon period, the British Isles were divided into a number of warring kingdoms. I will deal mainly with England, because that is what I know most about, but so far as genealogy is concerned, the differences in other parts of the island are not very significant. Although the word county is derived from the Norman French comté, the boundaries of Norman counties corresponded in most respects with those of the Saxon shires of the immediate pre-Norman period. Many of them were in turn based on much older tribal districts, which are reflected in names of Celtic origin such as Cornwall, Devon and Kent. Essex, Middlesex and Sussex were the lands occupied by the East, Middle and South Saxons respectively, while Norfolk and Suffolk were similarly the areas of the North Folk and South Folk of the Angles' kingdom of East Anglia.

The shires of the more northerly east and midlands were formed later by the Danes, and named after the local military centre in each case (Bedford, Cambridge, Derby, Huntingdon, Leicester, Lincoln, Northampton, Nottingham and York). The counties of the west midlands were formed by the king of Wessex after he invaded the area which had been the kingdom of Mercia. The remaining counties of northern England were created by the Normans to produce a reasonably uniform system across the whole of England. The origins of the Welsh counties are explained on Glyn Hale's excellent website . Various forms of county names In total contrast to the system in USA, the word "county" is a not part of the name of English counties, with the sole exception of County Durham, where it precedes the main part of the name in the same way as in all Irish counties. The American form of having the word "county" after the main name is always wrong in referring to a county in England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales. Many, but by no means all, have the syllable "-shire" as the last part of the name, and in a few cases this was normal use once but is slowly being dropped.

Examples of counties which are losing or have lost their suffix in this way are Devon(shire), Dorset and Somerset. Old documents consulted by genealogists of course show the usage which was normal at the time they were created, often differing from what is used now. (I am speaking here purely of naming conventions, not of changes in boundaries, which are covered below.) Counties which took their names from a major town within them, such as those created by the Danes listed above, were often referred to, for example, as The County of Nottingham, meaning the whole of Nottinghamshire. A particularly confusing example of this is the common naming of Hampshire as The County of Southampton; I have even found this on a will abbreviated to "co south". Co. is commonly used in old documents as an abbreviation for the word "county" or the words "county of". Boundary changes At a detailed level there have been numerous changes to county boundaries over the years. In some cases these have been to tidy up historic anomalies, such as tiny detached pieces of one county being entirely surrounded by another.

Such changes have taken place piecemeal over many years, with some such detached areas surviving to as recently as 1974 (notably the northern piece of Worcestershire containing the town of Dudley, which was entirely surrounded by Staffordshire). Certain areas, particularly the West Midlands, have undergone numerous changes, some towns having been in as many as three different historic counties at different times. In addition to the shifting boundaries described above, most of the larger towns and cities were at various times granted what was known as "county borough" status. A county borough functioned as a separate unit, independently of the county in which it was geographically situated. This system was started in 1888, when all towns and cities with populations in excess of 50,000, plus a few others, became the first such units. To confuse the issue further, in 1974 a total review of county boundaries took place, which led to the elimination of all remaining detached parts, the combining of some counties, total elimination of others, the introduction of new county names in some places, and the end of all county boroughs.

Major conurbations became independent "metropolitan" counties, each including a number of towns which had effectively merged by natural growth. An example of such a new metropolitan county was West Midlands, which combined the industrial areas of Birmingham, Coventry, Dudley and several other towns, reducing the size of the neighbouring counties of Staffordshire, Warwickshire and Worcestershire in the process. The 1974 changes, because of their scale, lead to much confusion among genealogists, especially those resident in other countries, when trying to locate the homes of their ancestors and the likely location of records. The whole of north Berkshire, for example, was transferred to Oxfordshire, so old records relating to such towns as Faringdon speak of its being in Berkshire, but modern gazetteers say it is in Oxfordshire. Similarly, Huntingdonshire, the Isle of Ely and the Soke of Peterborough were all absorbed into Cambridgeshire. Middlesex and large pieces of Essex, Hertfordshire, Kent and Surrey were absorbed into London. Similar events took place also in Yorkshire and Lancashire, while further north the maps were almost completely redrawn.

In 1997/8 many, but not all, of the 1974 changes were reversed. Although the name county borough was not revived, the effect was, and this time the independent status was not confined to urban areas. New local authorities called "Unitary Authorities" took over all local government functions in their areas, just like the old county boroughs and in many cases identical to them in area. This happened in a piecemeal fashion however, with no unitary authorities being created in some areas, but in the extreme case of Berkshire the whole of what survived the 1974 shake-up was split into unitary authorities, so Berkshire as an administrative unit no longer exists. This process has continued from time to time, with Bedfordshire, for example, ceasing to exist as an administrative unit in 2010. Hundred and Wapentake These are similar sub-divisions of counties, introduced in the 10th century primarily as a unit of taxation but also having administrative, judicial and military functions.

The two names relate to the division of the country into the Danelaw in the north, where the term wapentake was used, and the Anglo-Saxon south which used the term hundred. The name hundred relates to the original size of 100 hides of land (roughly 12,000 acres on average, but very variable). Parish Most parishes were originally the area served by a local church, and were (still are in many cases) synonymous with the village in which the church was situated, although outlying dwellings and farms away from the main village were normally included. It must be realised, however, that parishes varied enormously in size, some, especially in the wilder, uncultivated areas, extending for many miles. In some areas a single parish covered a great number of separate settlements (up to 35 in one Cheshire example). Urban parishes in older cities tended to be small in area, with quite a number of separate parishes within a single city (over 40 each in Norwich and York, for example), whereas newer cities tended to have a single parish despite their large population, until they were split up in the middle of the 19th century.

Parishes also varied greatly in age. Although most mediæval parishes had been formed by 1200, many were already hundreds of years old by that time. Many more were formed during the great growth in population in the 19th and early 20th centuries. The concept of a civil parish was introduced in Tudor times, when they were given responsibility for upkeep of highways, caring for the poor and for the less serious aspects of law enforcement. Where the ecclesiastical parish was reasonably small in population it normally corresponded with the civil one, but if the ecclesiastical parish was very large it was divided up into a number of civil parishes. Like the counties, parish boundaries showed abundant anomalies, detached parts being quite common. However, in 1894 a new Local Government Act revised the entire structure, dividing the rural areas of England and Wales into 14,000 parishes with most of the anomalies and detached parts removed, although in most respects the boundaries followed the old civil parish boundaries. From that time, the affairs of the parish were controlled by an elected parish council.

This is the one part of local government structure which survived the 1974 and 1997/8 reorganisations without significant change. In urban areas parishes remain as ecclesiastical units only since 1894, although the legislation bringing in the latest changes give residents the option of having civil parishes in their parts of urban areas if they choose to do so. In the above paragraph I say most of the anomalies and detached parts. It did say all, but my attention was drawn to one anomaly which still exists, and this suggests to me there may be others. The particular case is at Romsey in Hampshire, where there is still one parish entirely surrounded by another! Romsey Extra Parish (which I assume covers a rural area) entirely surrounds Romsey Infra Parish (which more or less coincides with the small town of Romsey).

John Parker, a member of Romsey Extra Parish Council, who drew my attention to this, also reminded me that many parishes which were created, by the demotion of small boroughs or otherwise cover relatively small urban areas, by the 1997/8 reorganisation, were given the option (which many, including Romsey Infra, have taken up) of being called "town councils", with the chairman of the council given the title of "Mayor", although their powers remain identical to those of other parish councils. I should also add that the Church of England still has its ecclesiastical parishes, quite separate from the civil ones, the governing bodies of which are now known as "parochial church councils". Some large ecclesiastical parishes have a second, subordinate, church or chapel to help cope with the numbers of people or the extended area; such a church or chapel normally has responsibility for a defined area within the parish sometimes known as a chapelry, with the subordinate/daughter church or chapel often called a "chapel of ease".

Genealogists need to be aware that it is these ecclesiastical parishes, not the civil parishes, which maintain the registers of baptisms, marriages and burials, although in most cases the surviving older registers have been deposited with the local county record office. Naming a Parish in Relation to Its County, Etc. I have been asked to clarify how a parish should be referred to in relation to the town/village/county of which it is a part. I have not been able to improve on the "off the cuff" reply I gave at the time: Most parishes are in rural areas, so no town name is relevant. Most, but by no means all, rural parishes coincide with a village, so normally nobody would bother to distinguish. It would then be simply parish, county, country, without the word "parish" being used. In a few cases (I know of only one, the parish of Felkirk, covering the village of Shafton, near Barnsley in the West Riding of Yorkshire) the name of the parish is not that of either the village or of the dedication of the parish church but an entirely independent name with some historical derivation. In some cases a parish covers more than one village.

There are then two possibilities: The parish may be called something like "Thaton cum Thisham" (fictional names!), meaning the parish covers the villages of Thaton and Thisham. Again it would be stated as parish, county, country, without using the word "parish". The parish may have the same name as just one village, in which case it would still be parish, county, country, but with the word "parish" after the parish name to make it clear that the whole parish, not just the village, was referred to. In a small town, with just one parish covering the entire town, the situation could be the same as 1 above, although sometimes the parish name would be that of the dedication of the church rather than the name of the town; in this case it would usually be given as parish, town, county, country, with the word "parish" coming first, as in "Parish of St. John, Whichton, Whatshire, England" (fictional names again). In a larger town, with more than one parish, there are again two possibilities, with the two both occurring in the same town, but for different parishes, in many cases.

One of the parishes may have the same name as the town, in which case it could be referred to as parish, county, country, including the word parish as in "Whichton Parish, Whatshire, England". Other parishes in the town would be of the form parish (normally that of the dedication of the church), town, county, country, as in the last example in 5 above. Poor Law Unions One of the most important duties placed on parishes by the Tudor reforms was the care of their own paupers. Since there was no social security of any kind, this was the only way the sick, disabled and elderly could survive (although the church, mainly through abbeys and monasteries, had provided some poor relief prior to their dissolution by Henry VIII). While this certainly helped those it was aimed at, it also placed a financial burden on the parish, for which they had to tax their more affluent members. The impact of this naturally varied from place to place, depending both on the ratio of paupers to wealthy citizens and on the general prosperity of the area concerned.

One particularly serious effect was that parishes were naturally very unwilling to accept into their midst anyone from another area who was likely to become a charge on the local finances. In consequence, severe restrictions were placed on the freedom of ordinary people to move around the country. The 1662 Act of Settlement defined more clearly the responsibilties of the parish and provided a means for people to move in search of work while being able to provide written evidence that they would never become a charge on the community to which they moved. This led to large numbers of court cases in local quarter sessions and the production of settlement certificates. These certificates, as well as detailed records of the courts, where they survive, provide invaluable resources for genealogists and family historians. The entire system was revolutionised in 1834 by the Poor Law Amendment Act. This created a system of Unions, each consisting of a number of neighbouring parishes who jointly were required to finance the relief of poverty in their areas, so spreading the load a little more fairly. Each union was run by an elected board of guardians, many of whose records survive. By 1865 all unions had set up a workhouse within their area in which to house paupers.

Many of the buildings erected for this purpose still survive, often as hospitals. The system remained largely unchanged until the introduction of some aspects of social security on a national basis, such as old age pensions, from 1908 onwards. The entire system was transferred from the parish unions to national government in 1919, but some workhouses continued in operation until the introduction of the modern welfare system by the National Assistance Act of 1948. Mid-19th century boards and districts During the middle part of the 19th century more and more functions were put onto local government organisations to relieve the many problems which were emerging with the growth of population, industrialisation, and urbanisation. However, instead of using existing administrative units to carry out these new activities, a new set of boards and districts were created for each one, often with boundaries overlapping those already in existence. Each of these new authorities required elections to choose its members and each raised its own finance by imposing a local tax (often called a rate).

Thus separate bodies existed to maintain highways, to provide and run schools, to provide sanitation, to provide burial facilities, etc.; in some places even the provision of hospitals and of the medical staff to operate them were provided by two separate authorities. The system (for want of a better term) was basically that a separate board was created for each function, with separate elections, separate finances, separate officials, separate premises from which to operate, etc. The waste and incompetence was tremendous. From the genealogical and historical research point of view, it is worth remembering that each of these bodies kept records, many of which survive. Most of this chaos was cleared up in 1888, when most of the local boards were transferred to the county councils, set up by the Local Government Act of that year as elected bodies with reformed boundaries. Poor Law unions (until 1930), School districts (until 1902) and Sanitary districts (until 1894), however, continued their independent existence a little longer. Boroughs Boroughs have from pre-Norman times been towns and cities which have received a charter granting them certain privileges, mainly but not exclusively concerned with the control of various commercial activities within their boundaries.

Such charters could be issued (in mediæval times) either by the monarch or by the local lord of the manor in which the town was situated. The latter were normally "seigneurial boroughs", having only a limited degree of independence from the lord of the manor. Those with corporate status had more complete independence from the lord of the manor, but the details of their powers varied enormously, depending on the detailed wording of their charters, which were all different. Corporate boroughs were administered by a Corporation, which consisted until 1835 of leading townsmen appointed for life, with vacancies filled by appointment by the existing members. From 1835 this system was replaced by elections for three quarters of the members, with the old system of appointment remaining for the other quarter. The appointed members were known as aldermen, an office which remained (but not with life-long tenancy) until 1974. (One quarter of the members of county councils were also appointed aldermen from 1888 to 1974.) The electors in corporate boroughs, and the people actually running the seigneurial boroughs, were known as burgesses.

In some places lists of burgesses survive; it is perhaps worth mentioning that although women could not vote in Parliamentary elections in Britain until 1925, nevertheless they could be, and sometimes were, burgesses, at least in the 19th century and perhaps earlier. The office of mayor has existed almost, if not quite, as long as there have been boroughs. In past times this was a powerful office, the mayor being the most important man in the town, but gradually the powers have been reduced until today the mayor of a town functions as (at least in theory) a politically neutral chairman of council meetings, and as a public figurehead, and is elected by councillors from among their own members. In boroughs officially recognised as cities (i.e. having a charter to say they have that status), the equivalent person is known as the lord mayor, but his functions are virtually identical. In the 21st century the old idea of having an executive mayor (subject to regular direct election) has been revived in a few places, starting with London. Urban and Rural District Councils In 1894 county areas outside boroughs were divided into urban and rural districts, normally following the boundaries of the Sanitary districts.

Each such district had an elected council, and its functions and structure were almost identical to those of the boroughs, but they did not have aldermen or mayors. The rural districts were further subject to division into parishes, now with elected parish councils (except very small places which had a parish meeting instead). Definitions of types of settlement There is often confusion as to the correct terminology to use for a settlement. What is the distinction between a hamlet and a village, or between a village and a town? What constitutes a city? This section is an attempt to clear up the confusion, so far as that is possible. I should perhaps establish that when I say a settlement I mean a group of dwellings (i.e. more than one), possibly with other buildings. First it should be made clear that for most purposes the only one of those terms with a definite fixed meaning is the city. A settlement is a city if it holds a charter from the monarch to say so, and not otherwise.

There is no other reliable indicator of city status, which is applied to large and small places alike, although I am not aware of any particularly small city which is not the location of a cathedral (but there are small places with cathedrals which are not cities). At the smallest end of the range, a settlement would normally be called a hamlet if it did not possess the simplest trappings of community life, such as a church or an inn or public house or a school or a post office or other shop. A village would normally possess all of those things, but there are obviously intermediate cases which have some but not others. The loss of some such facilities from a village which once had them all would certainly not lead to people changing the way they speak of it. The distinction between a village and a town is probably even more vague. Population is certainly an element. A place with fewer than about 1,500 residents is unlikely to be called a town by anyone, while one with over 5,000 will rarely be called a village (but there are exceptions).

If a place has an ancient regular market or fair it will almost certainly be called a town (if it is not a city), even if it is quite small by modern standards. A small town is much more likely than a village to have a definite commercial area at its centre, with a variety of shops, some of which may be quite specialised, whereas in a village shops will be few and tend to be general stores selling a mixture of groceries, hardware, newspapers and other items, often combined with a post office. If a village is at the larger end of the population range, then it will usually consist of a small older core with a considerable recent expansion, often inhabited by commuters who live in the village but work in a nearby larger town. Despite all that has been said, there are certainly some places which are ambiguous in this respect. Lynton, in north Devon, for example, together with its neighbour Lynmouth and a few outlying areas is for administrative purposes a parish. However, it has a most imposing town hall, a definite commercial centre in each of the two main constituents, and a mayor to chair the council's deliberations, but the inhabitants nevertheless refer to it as a village.

The population varies from about 1,500 in winter to ten times as many or more in the summer tourist season. I live in another, very different ambiguous area. Stopsley was once a typical hill-top village a few miles outside the town of Luton, but was long ago (1933) absorbed by the town. Nevertheless the inhabitants of this part of Luton still refer to the old village centre as "the village", and a book on the history of Stopsley, published on 21st October 1998, refers in the blurb on the cover to "The hamlet of Stopsley"! Other names for particular areas In addition to the general names for specific types of place or local government unit as described above, other terms are used to name particular areas of the country. This section lists a few of them. I will add more as I think of them or when someone draws my attention to them. Contributions are invited . The Black Country is the industrial area of (pre-1974) south east Staffordshire , north east Worcestershire , north west Warwickshire, and south Shropshire.

It is centred on the town of Dudley, and gained its name from the results of the massive atmospheric pollution produced by local metal-working industries, especially in the 19th century. Buildings and trees (where any survived) were black with soot, the stars were never visible in the sky, any washing hung outside was black with freshly deposited soot long before it was dry, and life expectancy was unsurprisingly short. County boundaries in the area always have been complex and subject to many changes. Forest of Bowland is an area of wild moorland bounded in the east and south by the River Ribble (which separates it from the Yorkshire Dales ), in the north by the River Lune and in the west by The Fylde . It is (on pre-1974 boundaries) partly in Lancashire and partly Yorkshire. Craven is an area of the Yorkshire Dales subsequently adopted as a district council's official name. The Dales is the name given to most of the more northerly section of the Pennine Hills. It consists of high moorland interspersed with a series of fast rivers flowing east to the North Sea. Each river valley is a dale, named after its river (e.g.

the River Swale runs through Swaledale). The Yorkshire section is a National Park, called the Yorkshire Dales National Park, but further north the Dales continue into County Durham, Westmorland and Northumberland to Hadrian's Wall, built by the Romans to keep out the barbarians across the border in Scotland. East Anglia is usually thought of today as being the round bulge on the east side of England, extending from the Thames estuary northwards to the large rectangular shallow inlet called The Wash. On this definition it consists of the counties of Norfolk , Suffolk and Essex, with Cambridgeshire sometimes also included. However, a more strict definition based on the boundaries of the ancient kingdom would restrict it to the counties of Norfok and Suffolk, plus the eastern part only of Cambridgeshire and the north-east corner of Essex. East Midlands is a largely but by no means exclusively industrial area, as one might expect located to the east of the West Midlands . It includes the counties of Derbyshire (although the northern, moorland, part is sometimes excluded), Leicestershire , Northamptonshire and Nottinghamshire .

Fenland is a term applied to an area of low-lying, very flat land (some of it below sea-level) in eastern England. Although nearly all of it is now drained and is a very fertile agricultural area, historically it was a place of marshes extending as far as the eye could see and well beyond. The counties parts of which comprise it are Cambridgeshire (almost all of it), Huntingdonshire (all of it), parts of west Norfolk , south Lincolnshire and part of north Bedfordshire. Drainage has resulted in shrinking of the soil, to the extent that some rivers, notably much of the Norfolk part of the Great Ouse, flow well above the surrounding land and are contained only by massive earthen embankments. The Isle of Ely, miles from the sea, is so-named because it was an island in the surrounding miles of fens. Incidentally, a fen is an alkaline marsh, distinguishing it from a bog which is always acidic. The Fylde is a short broad peninsula in Lancashire, bounded in the south by the estuary of the River Ribble, in the east by the Pennines, in the west by the almost entirely urban coastline of Lytham St.

Annes, Blackpool, Cleveleys and Fleetwood, and in the north by a stretch of north-facing Irish Sea coast known (I am told by a kind correspondent) as Over Wyre. The area is very flat, corresponding with its name, derived from filde, meaning plain. Halfshire was a hundred of north-east Worcestershire. It included Dudley and three other detached parts. Hallamshire is the area around and including the city of Sheffield, in south Yorkshire. So far as I know, there has never been a county of this name, but this large industrial city set in a river valley in the midst of wild moorland is a very distinctive place. The Home Counties are those counties surrounding London. These are Essex (note the overlap with East Anglia ), Hertfordshire, Middlesex, Buckinghamshire, Berkshire, Surrey and Kent (that sequence is going anti-clockwise from the Thames estuary). Sussex is also sometimes included. The origin of the name is obscure. The Lake District is an area of lakes and mountains in north-west England.

It includes England's longest (Lake Windermere) and deepest (Wastwater) natural lakes and highest mountains (Scafell Pike, Scafell, Helvellyn and others). It includes the whole of Westmorland, a great part of Cumberland and a small piece of north Lancashire (pre-1974 boundaries - using post-1974 boundaries it is entirely in Cumbria). The Peak District is the southern part of the Pennine Hills. It is an area of high moorland, with deep, often very picturesque valleys and occasional gorges, mostly situated in north and central Derbyshire but also extending into Staffordshire , Yorkshire and just a little into Lancashire (using pre-1974 boundaries). It was the first National Park to be defined in Britain. Vale of York is a roughly rectangular piece of fertile lowland running north-south between the North Yorkshire Moors and the Dales . The Weald is the name given to the area between the North Downs and the South Downs in south east England.

The downs mentioned are two ridges of chalk hills, running very roughly east to west across (mainly) Sussex and Kent, but meeting at the chalk hill plateau of north Hampshire and Salisbury Plain. They meet the sea at Dover (North Downs, forming the famous White Cliffs) and near Eastbourne (South Downs, forming the high cliffs of Beachy Head). The Weald itself was once heavily forested (the word weald is an Old English word meaning "woodland") and a centre for making charcoal for use in smelting iron. Welsh Marches are the counties making up the border area of England adjacent to Wales. Normally included are Cheshire, Herefordshire, Shropshire and Worcestershire , with Monmouthshire (in Wales) normally also included. This was an area of great strategic significance in the early mediæval period, before Wales was conquered and pacified. The name comes from the old word "march" meaning border. West Country is a term applied to the counties of south west England as a group. The counties normally included are Cornwall, Devon, Dorset , Somerset and Wiltshire , and very often Hampshire and/or Gloucestershire are also included.

It corresponds very roughly with the ancient kingdom of Wessex, and is sometimes given that name. West Midlands is the name given to the larger industrial area including the Black Country and surrounding towns and cities such as Birmingham, Coventry and many others. In 1974 a "metropolitan county" of this name was created to administer the area. Wirral is the roughly rectangular peninsula in north Cheshire (until 1974) lying between the estuaries of the rivers Dee and Mersey. The 1974 changes to local government boundaries transferred the northern half to the new Metropolitan County of Merseyside with the status of a Metropolitan Borough named Wirral, with the southern half retained in Cheshire with the title of Ellesmere Port & Neston District (but usually known as South Wirral). My thanks to those readers who have from time to time drawn my attention to errors and omissions on this page, which I have endeavoured to correct.

Main links within this site: The baffling map of England's counties - BBC News BBC News The baffling map of England's counties By Jon Kelly BBC News Magazine 25 April 2014 Close share panel Image copyright Alamy Signs marking traditional English county boundaries are due to return, but the distinction between historic and administrative divisions can be hugely confusing. Do you know which county you live in? Are you sure? Is that a historic or a ceremonial council or a county council or some combination thereof? Many people's sense of self is bound up in a fierce local pride about their county. But it isn't always clear exactly which is the relevant one. People in Scunthorpe lived in the non-metropolitan and ceremonial county of Humberside from 1974 to 1996. Now they live in the ceremonial county of Lincolnshire and the unitary authority of North Lincolnshire. Humberside no longer exists as a county but Humberside Police and Humberside Fire and Rescue Service still do.

If you're in Birkenhead, you are in the historic county of Cheshire, the ceremonial county of Merseyside (although Merseyside County Council was abolished in 1986) and the Metropolitan Borough of Wirral. Image copyright Dept of communities and local government Image caption Maps showing how ceremonial (left) and historic (centre) counties overlap (right) Middlesex dates back to the 8th Century but Middlesex County Council was abolished in 1965. Middlesex County Cricket Club and Middlesex University live on. So too does the historic county of Middlesex even though most of its inhabitants now live in the ceremonial county of Greater London. Still following? England's counties are the source of much regional pride, not least on cricket pavilions. To identify as a Yorkshirewoman or a Devonian or a Northumbrian is to invite certain expectations about the forthrightness of one's views or one's tolerance for cider and clog-dancing. Image copyright bojangles / Alamy But successive waves of local government reform have left many people deeply unclear as to which county they live in - the answer to which depends on exactly what you mean by the word "county".

Now, in an effort to support the "tapestry" of ancient place names, the government has changed its rules allowing councils to put up boundary signs marking traditional English counties - including the likes of Cumberland and Huntingdonshire, names which no longer have any connection to county-wide local authorities. "Previous governments have tried to wipe the counties off the map, imposing bland administrative structures or alien euro-regions," Communities Secretary Eric Pickles said as he announced the change. But "we are stronger as a nation when we cherish and champion our local and traditional ties", he added. The move has been welcomed by the Association of British Counties (ABC), which promotes awareness of the UK's 92 historic counties. It's unlikely, however, to clear up what the ABC calls "county confusion" . There are, in fact, three types of counties in England. Counties of different variety may share the same names as each other but not necessarily the same borders. First there are the historic counties, which date as far back as the mid-Saxon period. Some, like Westmorland, no longer exist in an administrative sense. But especially in places like Yorkshire, Durham and Cornwall, they are important expressions of geographic and cultural identity.

Then there are administrative counties and unitary authority areas created by the 1972 Local Government Act. These include non-metropolitan county councils like Oxfordshire and Surrey (where some services are also provided by districts). Others, like Northumberland, are single-tier unitary councils. Some areas like Berkshire have no county council and the districts are the sole local authorities. And finally there are the ceremonial counties, established by the 1997 Lieutenancies Act, each of which has a Lord Lieutenant. Bedfordshire and Cheshire, for instance, do not exist as councils but do as ceremonial counties. In metropolitan counties like Merseyside, Tyne and Wear and Greater Manchester, county councils were scrapped in the 1980s, but some services including transport and the police are run jointly by groups of councillors within the old boundaries. If you've followed that, well done. Catherine Staite, director of the Institute of Local Government at Birmingham University, says there was no consistency to the way these overlapping boundaries were drawn. "We've ended up with a patchwork of arrangements for which there is no logic." So, for instance, Barrow-In-Furness belongs to the historic county of Lancashire.

Its ceremonial county is Cumbria. It is governed by Cumbria County Council, which also covers the historic counties of Cumberland and Westmorland. Then there is Saddleworth, formerly of the West Riding of Yorkshire and now of the Metropolitan Borough of Oldham and the ceremonial county of Greater Manchester. Many of its inhabitants still proudly fly the white rose flag. In an effort to clear up the confusion - and, it says, champion England's local identities - the government is publishing an online interactive map of county boundaries and how they overlap. The situation is less confusing in Scotland and Wales, where local government is single tier, though some councils like Clackmannanshire and Fife do correspond to historic counties. In Northern Ireland, which has 26 district councils, inhabitants of counties Armagh, Antrim and Fermanagh will identify themselves as such. According to Andy Strangeway, a campaigner for greater recognition of England's counties, more of the historic East Riding of Yorkshire is outside the current East Riding of Yorkshire unitary council area than within it. This, he says, amounts to "cultural vandalism". Counties have been neglected, he believes, because they matter more to those who don't belong to the metropolitan elite.

"The further you get away from the M25, the more important counties become," he says. "It's in places like Yorkshire, Cornwall and Durham that they matter most." There have been setbacks for supporters of the counties. In 2010, the Royal Mail deleted county names from its Postcode Address File database, which lists every address in the UK. But the movement for greater recognition of these historic boundaries has reason to feel confident that its cause is on the march. Rutland, constituted as a district of Leicestershire in 1974, was re-established as a county in its own right in 1997. Cricket teams and BBC local radio stations all keep the names of counties alive. Some, including Staite, are sceptical about the wisdom of how far this can be taken. "Are you going to go back to the Wapentakes?" she says. But Strangeway says the counties will linger on in the popular imagination regardless. "No-one is loyal to the people who empty their bins - they'll be here today and gone tomorrow," he says. "The counties are part of our cultural heritage." Perhaps it doesn't matter if you can't make sense of them at all.

Follow @BBCNewsMagazine on Twitter and on Facebook

Question: Which English county borders only one other county?
Answer: CORNWALL