The United Kingdom - Countries - Office of the Historian The United Kingdom - Countries A Guide to the United States’ History of Recognition, Diplomatic, and Consular Relations, by Country, since 1776: The United Kingdom Summary The United States of America declared its independence from the United Kingdom of Great Britain on July 4, 1776. However, the American Revolutionary War continued until the British General Cornwallis surrendered to General George Washington on October 19, 1781. Aside from a break in relations over the War of 1812, and strains over the possibility of British recognition of the Confederacy during the Civil War, the United States and the United Kingdom have enjoyed generally cordial and consistent relations since American independence. Modern Flag of The United Kingdom Recognition British Recognition of U.S. Independence, 1783. The United Kingdom officially recognized American independence by signing the Treaty of Paris of 1783 . David Hartley, a Member of Parliament representing British King George III, signed the treaty along with the American delegation of John Adams , Benjamin Franklin , and John Jay on September 3, 1783. Consular Presence Consulates in Scotland.

President John Adams appointed Harry Grant as the first U.S. Consul to Scotland on July 14, 1798 in Leith. The U.S. Consulate crossed into Edinburgh in 1854, but it moved back to Leith in 1861. The Consulate finally settled back in Edinburgh in 1883, where it remains today. Glasgow (1801-1965) The United States opened the consulate in Belfast in 1796.

Londonderry (1834-1921) Old Hartlepool and West Hartlepool (1866 to ?, then 1899-1919 to just West Hartlepool) Hartlepool (1869-1897) Ramsgate, Margate and Deal (1870-?) Redditch (1871-1905) Conversation with George Hammond, [15–16 December 1791] Conversation with George Hammond, [15–16 December 1791] Conversation with George Hammond 1 [Philadelphia, December 15–16, 1791] Towards the end of last week, I had a very long and confidential conversation with Mr Hamilton, the Secretary of the Treasury, in the course of which the opinion, I had entertained, of that Gentleman’s just and liberal way of thinking was fully confirmed. The late unfortunate expedition under General St Clair 2 naturally engrossed a great portion of our conversation, whence I was induced to express his Majesty’s sincere desire to see tranquillity between the Indians and the United States permanently re-established.

I took occasion distantly to intimate that if this government should think proper to solicit the King’s interference for this purpose through his government in Canada, I had reason to believe that the application would not be ineffectual. 3 To this Mr Hamilton replied that the British Government might be assured that the United States, in the present war, were actuated by no motives of extending their territory, but simply by the desire of binding down the Indians to the stipulations of their last treaty, 4 and that if this object could not be attained by negociation, it was determined to prosecute the war with vigour— that this government was however sincerely solicitous to effect a pacification, and if the voluntary interposition of the King’s government in Canada could tend to accomplish it, such a measure would be received with the greatest gratitude. In another part of our conversation, Mr Hamilton hinted to me, with as much caution, as the danger of committing himself too far rendered necessary, that in the affairs of this country the present is an important crisis, upon which may depend the future complexion as well of its political connexions as of its commercial arrangements with the nations of Europe.

I farther collected from other incidental observations that the government of France seems inclined to hold out to this country, in their projected treaty, some additional circumstances of advantage, which will have a tendency still farther to favor and promote the navigation of the United States. 5 Upon this last head, I must not omit mentioning to your Lordship that Mr Hamilton informed me he was preparing a report upon the actual state of the navigation and commerce of this country, whence it would appear that the present system of France was more favorable to the former, and that of Great Britain to the latter. 6 He however admitted, that upon balancing the general aggregate advantages resulting to the country from these respective systems, the scale had hitherto decidedly preponderated in favor of the commercial encouragements afforded by Great Britain. 7 D , PRO: F.O. description begins Transcripts or photostats from the Public Record Office of Great Britain desposited in the Library of Congress. description ends , Series 4, Vol. 11 (Great Britain). 1 . This conversation has been taken from Hammond to Lord Grenville, December 19, 1791, Dispatch No. 13.

Hammond, the first British Minister to the United States, was sent his general instructions on September 2, 1791, by Lord Grenville, who had been made Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs on June 8, 1791. His private instructions, which had been given by Lord Hawkesbury, president of the Board of Trade, had been written on July 4, 1791 ( Mayo, Instructions to British Ministers description begins Bernard Mayo, ed., “Instructions to the British Ministers to the United States, 1791–1812,” Annual Report of the American Historical Association for the Year 1936 (Washington, 1941), III. description ends , 1–13). Hammond, only twenty-eight years old at the time of his appointment, had already had extensive diplomatic experience. He had been secretary to David Hartley during the peace negotiations at Paris in 1783, chargé d’affaires at Vienna from 1788 to 1790, and for a short time Minister Plenipotentiary under Lord St. Helens, the British Ambassador to Spain.

Hammond arrived in the United States in October, 1791, but, wishing tangible proof that the United States intended to send an envoy to England, he waited several weeks before presenting his credentials. After assurances by Jefferson that negotiations were under way for the appointment of an American emissary, Hammond was presented to the President on November 11, 1791. 2 . In the fall of 1791, Major General Arthur St. Clair, governor of the Northwest Territory, attempted to atone for the disastrous defeat suffered by American troops under Brigadier General Josiah Harmar at the hands of the Indians the previous year. From his base at Fort Washington near Cincinnati he drew up plans for an invasion of the Indian country. The expedition had traveled no more than ninety miles before the Americans, on November 4, 1791, were surprised and decisively defeated by the Indians. Nine hundred of St. Clair’s men were killed, and the larger part of the remaining American troops discarded their arms and fled. St.

Clair’s account of his defeat is printed in ASP description begins American State Papers, Documents, Legislative and Executive, of the Congress of the United States (Washington, 1832–1861). description ends , Indian Affairs, I, 137–38. 3 . As early as the spring of 1791, George Beckwith, the unofficial British emissary to the United States, following instructions sent to him by Lord Dorchester, Governor General of Canada, had suggested to United States officials that Dorchester should intervene to bring peace between the Americans and the Indians (see “Conversation with George Beckwith,” May 15, 1791 ). Although H had informed Beckwith that British mediation was inadmissible, neither Dorchester nor the British Ministry was willing to drop the idea.

On September 16, 1791, Henry Dundas, Secretary for Home Affairs, wrote to Dorchester that “it is His Majesty’s pleasure that every means which your prudence can suggest should be taken by you for healing the differences which at present exist, and for effecting, if possible, a speedy termination of the war” ( Brymner, Canadian Archives, 1890 description begins Douglas Brymner, ed., Report on Canadian Archives, 1890 (Ottawa, 1891). description ends , 173). Lord Grenville had instructed Hammond that “nothing would be more satisfactory to His Majesty” than to mediate between the Indians and Americans ( Mayo, Instructions to British Ministers description begins Bernard Mayo, ed., “Instructions to the British Ministers to the United States, 1791–1812,” Annual Report of the American Historical Association for the Year 1936 (Washington, 1941), III. description ends , 16). 4 . This is a reference to the treaties of Fort Harmar, which were signed on January 9, 1789.

For the texts of these treaties, see ASP description begins American State Papers, Documents, Legislative and Executive, of the Congress of the United States (Washington, 1832–1861). description ends , Indian Affairs, I, 5–7. Learn and talk about George Hammond (diplomat), Alumni of Merton College, Oxford, Ambassadors of Great Britain to Denmark, Ambassadors of Great Britain to the United States, British diplomats Early career[ edit ] Hammond came from East Riding of Yorkshire , [2] enjoyed a liberal education, and was a Master of Arts and Fellow of Merton College, Oxford . [3] During the peace talks between the 13 colonies of the United States of America and the Kingdom of Great Britain that would culminate in the Treaty of Paris in 1783, he served as a Secretary to David Hartley ; while in Paris, he also learned some French. [2] Subsequently, Hammond was appointed chargé d'affaires at Vienna from 1788 to 1790, [1] spent part of 1790 in Copenhagen , [4] and in 1791 found himself Counsellor of Legation at Madrid .

[2] Minister to the United States[ edit ] Despite American grumbles over the lack of a British envoy since the peace treaty concluded the American revolution in 1783, the decision for the British was by no means a simple one. The Articles of Confederation lacked both a fixed seat of government and single leader to accredit an envoy, and few qualified diplomats desired the post and its yearly salary of £ 2500. [2] David Hartley, himself approached for the position, recommended his former secretary Hammond to Charles Jenkinson , who in turn passed on the name to newly appointed Foreign Secretary William Grenville . [2] Hammond was soon given the job, boarded a ship for Philadelphia in September 1791 along with Edward Thornton , secretary of legation, [3] and arrived five weeks later on 20 October. [2] Hammond initially met with then Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson , but waited to formally present himself to President George Washington before an American Minister to England was chosen; [2] his reception on 11 November 1791 formally established relations between the two countries.

[5] Although Hammond described his situation as "new, critical and rather embarrassing", he also stated that "If I accepted a quarter of the invitations to dinner and tea parties which I receive I should have little time for business", and said of the leading families that "I have reason to think most of them are Tories at heart." [2] Hammond had four children, aged oldest to youngest: William Andrew, George, Margaret, Edmund. [4] His son, Edmund Hammond , would also join the Foreign Office. Hammond left his post on 14 August 1795, leaving the consul general at Philadelphia, Phineas Bond, in charge until Robert Liston arrived in America. [5] Later career[ edit ] Following his return from the United States, Hammond became an Undersecretary at the Foreign Office . In this position he advised and befriended Grenville and met George Canning ; [3] Canning founded the newspaper the Anti-Jacobin in 1797, and Hammond acted as joint-editor.

[1] Hammond would later be sent to one or two posts in continental Europe, and sometime in the 1810s he was appointed as a commissioner on the Arbitration of Revolutionary Indemnities, and as such spent many years living alternatively in London and Paris. [2] Hammond died in 1853 at the age of ninety. [2] Timeline of career [4] [ edit ] Secretary to Mr.

Hartley's mission at Paris (1783 – 1784) Charge d'Affairs at Vienna (21 September 1788 – 10 October 1789) Secretary of legation at Copenhagen (20 February 1790 – 23 September 1790) Secretary of embassy at Madrid (24 September 1790 – 5 July 1791) Minister plenipotentiary to the United States (5 July 1791 – 30 October 1795) Under secretary of state for foreign affairs (10 October 1795 – 20 February 1806) Under secretary of state for foreign affairs (5 April 1807 – 11 November 1809) Commissioner for British claims on France (September 1814 – July 1828) George Hammond (diplomat) George Hammond (diplomat) George Hammond George Hammond (1763–1853) [1] was a British diplomat and one of the first British envoys to the United States from 1791 to

 1795.

[2] Contents 6 References Early career Hammond came from East Riding of Yorkshire , [2] enjoyed a liberal education, and was a Master of Arts and Fellow of Merton College, Oxford . [3] During the peace talks between the 13 colonies of the United States of America and the Kingdom of Great Britain that would culminate in the Treaty of Paris in 1783, he served as a Secretary to David Hartley ; while in Paris, he also learned some French. [2] Subsequently, Hammond was appointed chargé d’affaires at Vienna from 1788 to 1790, [1] spent part of 1790 in Copenhagen , [4] and in 1791 found himself Counsellor of Legation at Madrid . [2] Minister to the United States Despite American grumbles over the lack of a British envoy since the peace treaty concluded the American revolution in 1783, the decision for the British was by no means a simple one. The Articles of Confederation lacked both a fixed seat of government and single leader to accredit an envoy, and few qualified diplomats desired the post and its yearly salary of £ 2500.

[2] David Hartley, himself approached for the position, recommended his former secretary Hammond to Charles Jenkinson , who in turn passed on the name to newly appointed Foreign Secretary William Grenville . [2] Hammond was soon given the job, boarded a ship for Philadelphia in September 1791 along with Edward Thornton , secretary of legation, [3] and arrived five weeks later on 20 October. [2] Hammond initially met with then Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson , but waited to formally present himself to President George Washington before an American Minister to England was chosen; [2] his reception on 11 November 1791 formally established relations between the two countries. [5] Although Hammond described his situation as “new, critical and rather embarrassing”, he also stated that “If I accepted a quarter of the invitations to dinner and tea parties which I receive I should have little time for business”, and said of the leading families that “I have reason to think most of them are Tories at heart.” [2] Hammond had four children, aged oldest to youngest: William Andrew, George, Margaret, Edmund. [4] His son, Edmund Hammond , would also join the Foreign Office.

Hammond left his post on 14 August 1795, leaving the consul general at Philadelphia, Phineas Bond, in charge until Robert Liston arrived in America. [5] Later career Following his return from the United States, Hammond became an Undersecretary at the Foreign Office . In this position he advised and befriended Grenville and met George Canning ; [3] Canning founded the newspaper the Anti-Jacobin in 1797, and Hammond acted as joint-editor. [1] Hammond would later be sent to one or two posts in continental Europe, and sometime in the 1810s he was appointed as a commissioner on the Arbitration of Revolutionary Indemnities, and as such spent many years living alternatively in London and Paris. [2] Hammond died in 1853 at the age of ninety. [2] Timeline of career [4] Secretary to Mr.

Hartley’s mission at Paris (1783 – 1784) Charge d’Affairs at Vienna (21 September 1788 – 10 October 1789) Secretary of legation at Copenhagen (20 February 1790 – 23 September 1790) Secretary of embassy at Madrid (24 September 1790 – 5 July 1791) Minister plenipotentiary to the United States (5 July 1791 – 30 October 1795) Under secretary of state for foreign affairs (10 October 1795 – 20 February 1806) Under secretary of state for foreign affairs (5 April 1807 – 11 November 1809) Commissioner for British claims on France (September 1814 – July 1828) See also Notes for a Conversation with George Hammond, [ca. 10 December … Notes for a Conversation with George Hammond, [ca. 10 December 1792] Notes for a Conversation with George Hammond [ca. 10 Dec.

1792] Heads of conversation with Mr. Hammond. That I communicated to the President his information 1 of the consent of the Western Indians to hold conferences of peace with us, in the presence of Govr. Simcoe . took care to apprize him of the informality of the conversation—that it was accidental—private the present to be considered equally so. 2 unnecessary to note to him that nothing like a Mediation was suggested 1. because so informal a conversation could not include so formal a thing as a Mediation . 2. because an established principle of public law among the white nations of America that while the Indians included within their limits retain all other natl. rights no other 3 white nation can become their patrons, protectors or Mediators, nor in any shape intermeddle between them and those within whose limits they are. that Gr. Br. would not propose an example which would authorise us to cross our boundary and take under our protection the Indians within her limits. 3. because should the treaty prove ineffectual, it would singularly commit the friendship of the two nations. that the idea of Govr.

Simcoe’s attendence was presented only as a thing desired by the Indians that the consequences of this had been considered it is not necessary in order to effect a peace our views so just, so moderate, that we have no fear of effecting peace if left to ourselves if it cannot be effected, it is much better that nobody on the part of Engld. should have been present for however our government is persuaded of the sincerity of their assurances that they have not excited the Indians yet our citizens in general are not so. it will be impossible to persuade them the negociations were not defeated by Brit. agent that therefore, tho we do not pretend to make the exclusion of Govr. Simcoe a sine qua non, provided he be there as a spectator, not as a party yet we should consider his declining to attend either by himself or any other person as an instance of their friendship and as an evidence of it particularly calculated to make due impression on the minds of our citizens. that the place (aux Glaise) fixed on by the Indians is extremely inconvenient to us because of the distance and difficulty of transporting provisions there. 300,000 rations will probably be requisite, if 3000 Indians attend.

that if we had time we would have proposed some other place, e.g. the Maumee towns. But there not being time, we shall do our best to make provisions. 1. we shall collect and carry as much as possible through the Miami channel. 2. we shall hope for their permission to have purchases made in upper Canada and brought along the lake. MS ( DLC ); entirely in TJ’s hand; undated, but written on the other side of a sheet containing “Anas” entries for 10, 12 and 17 Dec. 1792; contains several emendations; entry in SJPL : “[Dec.] 10. 12. 17. notes on our affairs with the Northern Indians. conversn with Hammond on do.” Included in the “Anas.” This document marked the definitive American rejection of a British diplomatic initiative that sought to reverse in part the verdict of 1783 by constricting the territorial limits of the United States. The initiative had been launched in March 1792 by Lord Grenville, the British foreign secretary, who, emboldened by Arthur St.

Clair’s catastrophic defeat in December 1791, instructed George Hammond to make a formal offer of British mediation of the Indian war to the American government. Under the terms of this proposal Britain would evacuate the posts on American soil still occupied by her troops in contravention of the Treaty of Paris in return for the creation of a neutral Indian barrier state composed of a large portion of the Northwest Territory and possibly parts of northern Pennsylvania and New York. American and British settlement in the barrier state would be forever banned, and neither nation’s forces would occupy the western posts. In addition to restoring peace between the United States and the hostile Western tribes, Grenville believed that a neutral Indian state would guarantee the security of Canada, preserve British influence among the Indians, and provide suitable compensation to the British for alleged American infractions of the peace treaty. But since the erection of an Indian barrier state would involve enormous territorial concessions by the United States, Grenville advised Hammond to use his discretion in formally offering British mediation to the American government on these terms (Grenville to Hammond, 17 Mch., 25 Apr.

1792, Mayo, British Ministers description begins Bernard Mayo, ed., “Instructions to the British Ministers to the United States 1791–1812,” American Historical Association, Annual Report, 1936 description ends , 25–9). Hammond received Grenville’s instructions towards the end of May 1792 and realized immediately that they were premature. In Hammond’s view, the Washington administration’s evident determination to resolve the conflict in the Northwest Territory without British interference, its denial that the Indian tribes were sovereign nations, and the westward tide of American settlement all made it virtually certain that the United States would reject an official offer of British mediation along the lines proposed by the foreign secretary. Nevertheless, he unofficially discussed the merits of an Indian barrier state in very general terms with Hamilton, then with TJ, and finally with Henry Knox, all of whom opposed the plan.

Under these circumstances, Hammond concluded that for the moment it would be futile to approach the American government with a formal proposal of British mediation and so informed Grenville, who accepted the young envoy’s estimate of the situation (Notes of Conversation with Hammond, 4 June 1792; Hammond to Grenville, 8 June, 3 July 1792, PRO : FO 4/15; Grenville to Hammond, 4 Aug. 1792, Mayo, British Ministers description begins Bernard Mayo, ed., “Instructions to the British Ministers to the United States 1791–1812,” American Historical Association, Annual Report, 1936 description ends , 30–1). But what Hammond could not accomplish directly, he sought to achieve by stealth. Turning to Lieutenant Governor Alured Clarke of Lower Canada and Lieutenant Governor John Graves Simcoe of Upper Canada, who were under instructions from the British government to help him mediate the Indian war, Hammond explained why it was then inadvisable to make a direct offer of British mediation to the American government.

At the same time he noted that the Washington administration might be amenable to British mediation if it suffered another devastating defeat at the hands of the Western Indians or if there was a request for British mediation by these tribes. In order to ensure the success of an Indian request for British mediation, Hammond carefully noted, it would have to appear to be the result of the “spontaneous reflexions” of the hostile tribes themselves, and it would require the support of all the tribes “bordering on the British possessions” in North America to achieve “the formation of a barrier so extensive as is contemplated in our respective instructions” (Hammond to Clarke and Simcoe, 11 July 1792, PRO : FO 116/2; see also Henry Dundas to Clarke and to Simcoe, 16 Mch. 1792, Simcoe Papers description begins E. A. Cruikshank, ed., The Correspondence of Lieut. Governor John Graves Simcoe, with Allied Documents relating to His Administration of the Government of Upper Canada, Toronto, 1923–31, 5 vols. description ends , i, 125–6).

Hammond’s thinly veiled suggestion that the goal of British mediation should be pursued by other means struck a responsive chord in Simcoe, who had a grandiose vision of the role the recently created province of Upper Canada was destined to play in the future of the British Empire. Convinced that the American experiment in republicanism was doomed to failure by the inherent defects of popular government, Simcoe firmly believed that the creation of a model British government and society in Upper Canada would make the American people aware of the error of independence and lead to their reunion with the mother country. But he also feared that this vision would be endangered by the conclusion of a separate peace between the Western Indians and the United States because he believed that this would destroy British influence over these tribes and lead them to take up arms against Upper Canada, making it impossible for the province to develop along the lines he regarded as essential to his goal of Anglo-American union.

Accordingly, at the end of August 1792, he dispatched Alexander McKee, the deputy superintendent of Indian affairs at Detroit, on a special mission to the Indian council at the Glaize, with instructions to induce the Indians “of themselves to solicit the King’s good Offices” in mediating their conflict with the United States as the first step in the establishment of a barrier state (Simcoe to McKee, 30 Aug. 1792, and to Hammond, 27 Sep. 1792, Simcoe Papers description begins E. A. Cruikshank, ed., The Correspondence of Lieut. Governor John Graves Simcoe, with Allied Documents relating to His Administration of the Government of Upper Canada, Toronto, 1923–31, 5 vols. description ends , i, 207–9, 214–17; see also same, 17–18, 30, 173–4, 199–204; and S. F.

Wise, “The Indian Diplomacy of John Graves Simcoe,” Canadian Historical Association, Report, [1953], 36–44). McKee’s mission was a success in every way from the British point of view. The Glaize council decided early in October 1792 to enter into peace negotiations with the Washington administration the following spring for the express purpose of establishing the Ohio River as a permanent boundary with the United States. It also requested McKee to ask Simcoe to act as mediator in the projected negotiations with the United States. Simcoe communicated these results to Hammond and later asked him how he should respond to the Indian request for his mediation (Proceedings of Glaize Council, 30 Sep., 9 Oct. 1792; Simcoe to Hammond, 17 Nov. 1792; Hammond to Simcoe, 27 Nov. 1792, Simcoe Papers description begins E. A. Cruikshank, ed., The Correspondence of Lieut. Governor John Graves Simcoe, with Allied Documents relating to His Administration of the Government of Upper Canada, Toronto, 1923–31, 5 vols.

description ends , i, 218–29, 262, 267). But Hammond was unable to translate McKee’s successful intercession with the Indians into any tangible diplomatic advantage for the British. Aware that the United States government was still not open to a formal offer of British mediation, Hammond decided again to consult informally with American officials about the Indian request for Simcoe’s services. Thus, late in November 1792, he turned first to Hamilton, his closest confidant among Washington’s cabinet members, and unofficially urged the beneficial effects of Simcoe’s mediation. Hamilton thanked the British minister for the information about the Glaize council, of whose deliberations the American government had hitherto been in total ignorance, but reiterated his opposition to British mediation of the Indian war (Hammond to Simcoe, 27 Nov. 1792, same, i, 267–8). Hammond then sought to convince TJ of the advantages of Simcoe’s mediation. But the Secretary of State avoided any comment on the substance of this proposal and merely promised to inform the President without delay of the information about the council at the Glaize.

In consequence, Hammond was obliged to inform Simcoe that the United States government “still persevere in their determination to endeavour to effect a pacification solely by their own exertions, and not to require or admit our intervention or assistance in settling the conditions of it,” though he did not altogether abandon hope that this attitude might change (Hammond to Simcoe, 27 Nov. 1792, same, 268; see also Hammond to Grenville, 4 Dec. 1792, PRO : FO 4/16). In the end TJ decided to make a more formal response to Hammond on the subject of British mediation because of the exigencies of Indian-American relations. Early in December 1792 the Washington administration was officially informed by the Six Nations of the willingness of the Western Indians to enter into peace talks.

In the course of transmitting this information, however, the Six Nations, who had been employed by the administration to offer peace on its behalf to the Western tribes at the Glaize, called attention to the Indian request for Simcoe’s mediation but downplayed their demand for an Ohio River boundary with the United States ( ASP description begins American State Papers: Documents, Legislative and Executive, of the Congress of the United States, Washington, D.C., Gales & Seaton, 1832–61, 38 vols. description ends , Indian Affairs, i, 322–4). Since the administration was eager for negotiations with the hostile tribes but averse to British mediation, TJ drafted the document above so as to leave no room for doubt in the British minister’s mind that the United States government was unalterably opposed to the Indian request for Simcoe to serve as mediator. He then showed this document to the President, who approved it, after which it was sanctioned during a cabinet meeting on 10 Dec.

Two days later TJ conveyed the substance of it to Hammond in the course of a lengthy conversation, which finally convinced the British minister that “the resolution of this government not to admit the interposition of his Majesty’s good offices is fixed and invariable, and that it is determined to rely wholly on its own exertions to effect a peace” ( Notes of Cabinet Meeting on Indian Affairs, 10 Dec. 1792 ; Notes of a Conversation with Hammond, 12 Dec. 1792 , and note containing Hammond’s account of the conversation; Hammond to Grenville, 1 Jan. 1793, PRO : FO 116/3). Consequently, Hammond made no further effort during TJ’s tenure as Secretary of State to pursue the chimerical goals of British mediation and an Indian barrier state. 1 . Preceding two words written over what appears to be “what he said,” erased. 2 . Line inserted during revision.

GOOD MORNING – TODAY IS by John Dwyer – The Somerville News Weekly July 5, 2015 by thesomervillenewsweekly Leave a Comment GOOD MORNING – TODAY IS SUNDAY, July 5, the 186th day of 2015 with 179 to follow. Sunrise in the Boston area is @ 5:12 and sunset is @ 8:24. The moon is waxing. The morning stars are stars are Neptune & Uranus. The evening stars are Jupiter, Mars, Mercury, Saturn & Venus. ON THIS DAY IN: 1791 – George Hammond was appointed the first British ambassador to the United States. 1811 – Venezuela became the first South American country to declare independence fromSpain. 1865 – William Booth founded the Salvation Army, in London. 1892 – Andrew Beard was was issued a patent for the rotary engine. 1935 – The National Labor Relations Act was passed in the U.S. 1943 – The Battle of Kursk, the largest tank battle in history, began.

1946 – The bikini, designed by Louis Reard, made its debut during an outdoor fashion show inParis. 1951 – Dr. William Shockley announced that he had invented the junction transistor. 1975 – Cape Verde Islands officially became independent after 500 years of Portuguese rule. 1975 – Arthur Ashe became the first black man to win a major men’s singles championship. 1989 – The sitcom Seinfeld aired its first episode. 2004 – The first presidential elections were held in Indonesia.

Share this: Winter Hill Bank “A Mutual Bank Serving the Community Since 1906” Century 21 Commonwealth Somerville Voted Best Realtor 2013, 2014 & 2015 Century 21 Commonwealth Voted Best Realtor 2013, 2014, 2015 Everyday Is Customer Appreciation Day at Somerville News Weekly Voted Best Auto Sales Great Hill Dental in Davis Square Somerville (617)764-3440 Wedgwood-Crane & Connolly Insurence Davis Square Somerville (617)625-0781 Green & Yellow Cab of Somerville Call: (617)625-5000 or (617)628-0600 Asphalt Services 1(866)5-HOT-TOP Mount Vernon Restaurant & Pub 14 Broadway, Somerville, MA 02145 (617) 666-3830 Jerry’s Liquor Mart 329 Somerville Ave, Somerville (617) 666-5410 GE Auto

 Repair 631 Somerville Avenue Somerville MA 02143 Call (781)831-1034 West 7 Bistro 1137 Broadway, Somerville, MA 02144 (617) 776-2800 Cambridge Mobile Sound (617)876-3200 Attorney Michael T Dwyer Next to Assembly Square, 5 Middlesex Ave Somerville (617)625-5200 Law Office of Attorney Sean O’Donovan ODOLAW.COM Call For Initial Free Consultation (617)629-8888 Law Office of Attorney Sean O’Donovan ODOLAW.COM (617)629-8888 Richard G.

Di Girolamo Anne M. Vigorito ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW Criminal Defense Civil Litigation Personal Injury Family Law Real Estate Law Zoning (617)666-8200 Richard G. Di Girolamo & Anne M.

Vigorito ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW 617)666-8200 CARROLL SONS INC ROOF & GUTTER 1(800)734-8334 (617)625-8334 CARROLL & SONS INC ROOF & GUTTER 1(800)734-8334 (617)625-8334 Join The Somerville Lions Club and Be Part of Something Big Somervillelionsclub@yahoo.com or call (617)293-2016 Join The Somerville Lions Club Somervillelionsclub@yahoo.com (617)293-2016 Somerville Computers 238 Somerville Ave Somerville MA 02143 Sales & Service New and Used Computers Repaired PC’s and Mac’s (617)666-5692 Somerville Computers (617)666-5692 Early National Period-War of 1812 - History 330 with Guerrier at James Madison University - StudyBlue Good to have

 you back!

If you've signed in to StudyBlue with Facebook in the past, please do that again. Early National Period-War of 1812 Early National Period-War of 1812 Molly M. a loose group of govs working together US Constitution The supreme law of the United States of America The Constitution was adopted on September 17, 1787 Advertisement ) essay by John Jay STRONG FED/NATIONAL GOV Jay argues that a singular government speaking for all states would serve as a greater deterrent to military interference by foreign nations than a system of government where each state is given complete control over its affairs. Wars of the French Revolution -collapse of absolute monarchy -defeat of Napoleon led to American acquisition of LA purchase -series of major conflicts from 1792-1802 -Treaty of Amiens is considered to be the endpoint of the French Revolutionary Wars Louis XVI King when France was in huge debts, weak Lazar Carnot Able to survive and maintain power in all phases of the French Rev.

Wars Author of many reforms thought to be good for the Republic Without him, modern warfare with mass armies and strategic planning would not exist Levee en Masse military draft by Carnot conscripted the entire population to contribute to revolutionary war: -Young men fought -Old men gave speeches to show hatred for others -Women supplied uniforms and cared for soldiers -Children tore sheets for band-aids Orders in Council Series of decrees by British during wars w/ Napoleonic France British forbid Americans from trading with French closed all ports under French control significance: shaped British war effort against France and strained relations btw UK and neutral countries Paper/legitimate blockade Paper blockade is not a legitimate blockade general sense that in order for a blockade to be legal it must be effective. Must put enough ships on the blockade line outside French port so that there is a reasonable chance that any ship trying to run the blockade is going to get caught incentive for blockading power to slowly slip some ships away over time and at some point reach a level where the odds favor the neutral, americans argue that British have paper blockade so what theyre doing is illegal Rule of 1756 trade not opened in peace time can't be open in war time.

Important because US trade with France skyrockets once the war starts. British seizing American ships attempting to trade with France, American shippers are making so much money that if they send out four ships and three of them get caught they're still making money practice of seizing seamen from American merchant ships and forcing them to serve in the British or French navy. cause of war of 1812 Both Britain and France were impressing American ships and in 1810 congress passed a law permitting direct trade with either France or Britain depending on which one would end their trade restrictions, so Napolean jumped on the opportunity and promised to end Frances restrictions but unfortunately it was a trick and the French continued to seize American ships.

leader of the Federalists; first treasurer of the U.S.; creator of the Bank of the US;and killed in a duel by Aaron Burr(vice president) Federalists called for a national bank, tariffs, and good relations with Britain as expressed in the Jay Treaty negotiated in 1794 James Madison British diplomat and the first British envoy to the United States from 1791 Jay's Treaty treaty between the US and UK major concessions to avert a war over the British seizure of American ships and impressments facilitated ten years of peaceful trade between the two Don Diego de Gardoqui the financial intermediary between the Spanish court and the American colonies provided the colonies with military weapons summer of 1786, he and Jay worked up a treaty in which US would receive a commercial treaty with Spain in exchange for giving up its claims to free navigation of Mississippi--> never ratified Jay-Gardoqui Talks treaty between the US and Spain guaranteed Spain's exclusive right to navigate the Mississippi River for 20 years it also opened Spain's European and West Indian seaports to American shipping Treaty was not ratified under the articles of confederation Served as the first US Secretary of War under Washington.

Knox stood that Indian nations were sovereign and possessed the land they occupied, and that the federal government, not the states, should be responsible for dealing with them. officer of the Continental Army during the American Revolution oversaw US military activity in the N.W. Indian War Treaty of Fort Stanwix Treaty between North American Indians and the British empire.

Purpose was to adjust the boundary line between Indian lands and British colonial settlements set forth in the Royal Proclamation of 1763 The British government hoped a new boundary line might bring an end to the rampant frontier violence which had become costly and troublesome Alexander McGillvray Principal chief of the Upper Creek towns created an alliance between the creek and the British during the American Revolution worked to establish a creek national identity and centralized leadership as a means of resisting European-American expansion onto Creek territory manuel de godoy Prime minister of Spain from 1792-1797 and 1801-1808 Blamed for the disastrous war with Britain that cut off Spain's Empire and ruined its finances Gouverneur Morris founding father of the US credited as the author of the document's preamble Morris advanced the idea of being a citizen of a single union of the states Nootka Sound 1774 Spain sent expeditions to Alaska to assert its long-held claim over the Pacific NW. British merchants made a sustained attempt to develop this trade despite Spain's claims and navigation rights. Span.

Bourbon monarchy asked for French support in the dispute in the event that it led to war between Spain and GB- King Louis XVI wanted to back Spain against GB, but his right to enter France into an alliance on his own prerogative was disputed by the National Assembly Neutrality Proclamation Formal announcement issued by the US declaring the nation neutral in the conflict between France and GB Threatened legal proceedings against any American providing assistance to any country at war Edmund Genet French ambassador to the US during the French Revolution.

In 1793 he was dispatched to the US to promote American support for France's wars with Spain and Britain His actions endangered American neutrality in the war btwn France and Britain-recruited and armed American privateers who would join French expeditions against the British took refuge later in life in the US Anthony Wayne adopted a military career at the outset of the American Revolutionary War led an expedition in the nw indian war indians resisted annexation of the area by the us Timothy Pickering Third US Secretary of State pushed for pro-british policies during his political career opposed the war of 1812 James Monroe Fifth president of the US was a founding father believed the constitution gave too much power to the central gov Farewell Address letter written by GW to people of US warned against dangers of political parties and foreign alliances.

Stated the nation's intention was to extend commercial relations but restrict political alliances as much as possible since Europes interests were not those of the US federalist frigates The United States Congress authorized the original six frigates of the United States Navy with the Naval Act of 1794 on 27 These ships were built during the formative years of the United States Navy; 80,000 militiamen were to be armed and trained; harbor defenses built; and $800,000 borrowed to pay for an undeclared “Quasi‐War” with France. Thomas Pickney The Hammond surname (Research another surname) Investigate the background of the Hammond Family Tree using the links below. We hope you find this information useful whilst you are unearthing your Hammond Family Tree ! Did you know that in the 1881 UK census there were 17050 people with the Hammond surname? In that year Hammond was ranked number 218 for popularity in the UK. New to Family History? Check out our Getting Started page. Check out House Of Names to investigate the origins of the Hammond surname or get a copy of the Hammond family Crest (a great gift idea!).

Hammond records on Ancestry Ancestry is a major source of information if you are filling out your Hammond family tree. Many large databases are available to search covering from births, deaths and marriages, military records, census records and immigration records with many other smaller collections too. Free trials are normally available and are a good way to fill out a lot of your tree quickly. Records Found Military records search results for the Hammond surname. DNA Sometimes you can run into a brick wall in your tree and you just don't have enough evidence to make that next step back in time. If you are lucky then you may find some previously undiscovered Hammond ancestors. Additionally, the modern DNA test can give you a breakdown of your ethnic mix - you may be surprised at the results! Have you reached a brick wall in your Hammond Tree? Visit our Hammond DNA page to find out more. Birth, Death and Marriage Records for the Hammond Family History Birth, Death and Marriage records are often the best method of making the links to the Hammond Genealogy that will form part of your family tree. Although records vary from country to country, they are normally the most formal record of a person's relations.

From the sources below you will be able to find a birth record and, from that, a birth certificate can be ordered which lists the names of the mother and father, taking you back another generation in your tree. A marriage certificate may also list the names of the respective fathers of the bride and groom which may then help you to find them earlier in life on a census record enableing you to fill out more detail in the Hammond family tree. Search the huge Ancestry records Database for Births, Marriages and Deaths of the Hammond family. Search Hammond Parish Records at Find My Past . Explore the UK registered births, marriages and deaths of the Hammond family using the FreeBMD database. Study MyHeritage for Hammond family data. Study the LDS Database for records of the Hammond family. Research the Hammond surname using Regimental archive Footnotes by viewing images of original Hammond family history documents. Study World Vital Records for information on the Hammond family. Did you know that there are currently 22085 people with the Hammond surname in the UK? Hammond is now ranked number 241 for popularity in the UK. Hammond Family Tree Databases Search WikiTree for user contributed Hammond family records.

Collaboration is encouraged so that accuracy of Hammond data can be verified or corrected by other users. Explore MyTrees for information on the Hammond family and people looking to contact living Hammond relations. Explore GENi for Hammond family records. Explore One Great Family for Hammond records submitted by people who are already researching the Hammond Genealogy . Find your Irish Hammond relatives on findmypast.ie Hammond Forums Explore RootsWeb forums for Hammond records. Did you know that there are currently 85071 people with the Hammond surname in the USA? Hammond is ranked number 129 for popularity in the USA. Miscellaneous Hammond Databases Explore the Ellis Island Database for information on the Hammond family. This database contains over 25 million immigration records detailing passengers arriving in the United States of America. Research the Hammond surname using the Genealogy Today database . View the distribution of the Hammond surname in Britain using the public profiler Names database . The public profiler Names database contains distributions for the Hammond surname in both 1881 and 1998. It also contains data on the ethnicity breakdown of the Hammond surname.

John Adams John Adams Currency: USD Category: Collectibles / Autographs Start Price:NA Estimated At:12,000.00 - 15,000.00 USD Bidding Over The auction is over for this item. The auctioneer wasn't accepting online bids for this item. Auction Date:2010 Jun 16 @ 10:00 (UTC-5 : EST/CDT) Terms Bid online at Auction closes June 16. ALS, one page, 8 x 9.75, August 16, 1792. As vice president, Adams writes Mr. Hammond. In full: “I have this moment received your kind letter of the 18th and congratulate you on your arrival in New England. If you will do me the honour to take a Family Dinner with me on Sunday at two o’clock you will very much oblige your old Friend and faithful humble Servant.” Affixed to a same-size piece of light cardstock and in very good condition with mild soiling and rippling, clipped upper left corner, and small chip to right edge.

As Adams wrote this letter in 1792, relations between the United States and the United Kingdom were still on shaky ground. Thomas Jefferson and his Democratic partners preferred their French allegiance, although Adams and his Federalist colleagues supported relations with the British. British leaders, for their part, were less than enthusiastic at the time to embrace the government of their one-time colony, slowly evacuating frontier forts and critical of US navigation laws that were harmful to trade. In fact, it was eight years before an envoy was actually named. That man would be George Hammond, the recipient of this letter, a British diplomat, and the UK’s first British envoy to the United States, serving in that post from 1791 to 1795. His relationship with Adams, however, preceded the current official capacity, as Hammond and his “old friend” likely first met after Congress appointed Adams ambassador to Britain's Court of St. James in 1785. His arrival in the United States in 1791 and a subsequent reception in November of that year formally established relations between the two countries after years of strife.

Interestingly enough, Hammond had been quoted as saying during this time that if he had accepted all of the invitations he received for tea or dinner, he would not have time to work. One might assume that he made an exception for his friend, the vice president. ALS - Autograph Letter Signed PayPal Buyer's Premium A 20% buyer's premium will be added to each winning bid, with a 2% discount for those paying by check, cash, or money order. Your bid is a contract Placing a bid online means you agree to abide by the terms and conditions listed by RRAuction. Payment methods accepted Money Order, Cashier's Check, Personal Check, or Wire Transfer. Payment for items won in auction 353 is due by Monday, January 25, unless prior arrangements have been made. Late payment may result in suspension of your bidding privileges. Visa, Mastercard, PayPal, or Discover are only accepted up to $5,000 without prior arrangement: please contact Mandy Eaton-Casey. Further descriptions You can call us or email us if you'd like us to answer questions about these items. George Hammond | ZoomInfo.com M. A. Of Exeter Col.

Oxford Web References (82 Total References) On November 11th, 1791, [cached] On November 11th, 1791, George Hammond, the first British Minister to the United States, presented his credentials to George Washington. On November 11th, 1791, [cached] On November 11th, 1791, George Hammond, the first British Minister to the United States, presented his credentials to George Washington. On November 11th, 1791, [cached] On November 11th, 1791, George Hammond, the first British Minister to the United States, presented his credentials to George Washington. On November 11th, 1791, [cached] On November 11th, 1791, George Hammond, the first British Minister to the United States, presented his credentials to George Washington. George Hammond

Question: In 1791 George Hammond was appointed the first British envoy to which country?
Answer: USA