input: Text: Professor D: OK. So, uh You can fill those out, uh <unk>pause<unk> after, actually, so So, I got, uh <unk>pause<unk> these results from, uh, Stephane. Also, um, I think that, uh <unk>pause<unk> um <unk>pause<unk> we might hear later today, about other results. I think s that, uh, there were some other very good results that we're gonna wanna compare to. But, <unk>vocalsound<unk> r our results from other <unk>disfmarker<unk> other places, yeah. PhD A: I I'm sorry? I didn't Professor D: Um, I got this from you PhD A: Yeah. Professor D: and then I sent a note to Sunil about the <unk>disfmarker<unk> cuz he has been running some other systems PhD A: Mm - hmm. Professor D: other than the <unk>disfmarker<unk> the ICSI OGI one. PhD A: Oh yeah. Professor D: So <unk>pause<unk> um, I wan wanna <unk>disfmarker<unk> wanna see what that is. But, uh, you know, so we 'll see what it is comparatively later. But <unk>pause<unk> it looks like, um PhD A: M yeah. Professor D: You know most of the time, even <unk>disfmarker<unk> I mean even though it's true that the overall number for Danish <unk>disfmarker<unk> we didn't improve it If you look at it individually, what it really says is that there's, um, uh Looks like out of the six cases, between the different kinds of, uh, matching conditions <unk>pause<unk> out of the six cases, there's basically, um, a couple where it stays about the same, uh, three where it gets better, and one where it gets worse. PhD
  Question: What did the professor think about the pragmatic overview of the project?
  Answer:
output: The professor thought that they needed to work more and asked who had ideas on how they could pursue new directions. He himself wanted to try out playing with MSG and multi-band. He also thought that they should try learning more about different acoustic environments.