input: Text: PhD B: We're, I mean <unk>pause<unk> we <unk>disfmarker<unk> We didn't have a house before. Professor D: Yeah. Yeah. PhD E: OK. Professor D: We're on again? OK. PhD A: Mm - hmm. That is really great. Grad H: Yeah, so if <unk>pause<unk> uh <unk>disfmarker<unk> <unk>pause<unk> So if anyone hasn't signed the consent form, please do so. PhD A: That's terrific. PhD B: Oh, yeah! Professor D: OK Grad H: The new consent form. The new and improved consent form. PhD A: Now you won't be able to walk or ride your bike, huh? Professor D: OK. Postdoc F: Uh. PhD B: Right. Professor D: OK. Grad H: And uh, shall I go ahead and do some digits? Professor D: Uh, we were gonna do that at the end, remember? Grad H: OK, whatever you want. Professor D: Yeah. Just <unk>disfmarker<unk> just to be consistent, from here on in at least, that <unk>disfmarker<unk> <unk>pause<unk> that we 'll do it at the end. PhD B: The new consent form. Grad H: It's uh <unk>disfmarker<unk> <unk>pause<unk> Yeah, it doesn't matter. OK. Professor D: OK Um Well, it ju I mean it might be that someone here has to go, Postdoc F: Testing, one, two, three. Professor D: and <unk>disfmarker<unk> Right? That was <unk>disfmarker<unk> that was sort of the point. So, uh <unk>pause<unk> I had asked actually anybody who had any ideas for an agenda <unk>pause<unk> to send it to me and no one did. So, Grad H: So we all forgot. Professor D: Uh
  Question: What was said about the overlaps? 
  Answer:
output: PhD G explained how the data represents the number of overlaps regardless of the number of speakers. It is important to  answer the question of whether overlaps are distributed evenly throughout or whether they are in bursts. Anonymizing the results and classifying overlaps by type may assist in standardizing cultural ways of conversing. PhD G proposed finding the average length of overlaps and the distribution of the duration of overlaps .