input: Text: Grad H: st Grad F: So we're on. Grad H: Yeah. That's better. Grad F: And, <unk>comment<unk> somewhere is my agenda. I think the most important thing is Morgan wanted to talk about, uh, the ARPA <unk>pause<unk> demo. Professor D: Well, so, here's the thing. Um, why don't we s again start off with <unk>disfmarker<unk> with, uh, Yeah, I 'll get it. I 'll get the door. Um, I think we want to start off with the agenda. And then, given that, uh, Liz and Andreas are gonna be <unk>pause<unk> ten, fifteen minutes late, we can try to figure out what we can do most effectively without them here. So <unk>disfmarker<unk> <unk>vocalsound<unk> So <unk>disfmarker<unk> so, one thing is, yeah, talk about demo, Grad F: OK. So, uh <unk>disfmarker<unk> uh, IBM transcription status, Professor D: IBM transcription. Uh, what else? Grad F: Professor D: What's SmartKom? SmartKom? Grad F: Uh, we wanna talk about if w if we wanna add the data to the mar Meeting Recorder corpus. PhD E: The data. The data which we are collecting here. Professor D: What <unk>disfmarker<unk> what <unk>disfmarker<unk> what are we collecting here? PhD E: Data? Grad F: So why don't we have that on the agenda and we 'll <unk>disfmarker<unk> we 'll get to it and talk about it? PhD E: The SmartKom data? Professor D: Yeah, right. PhD E: Yeah. Professor D: Uh, right. Uh. Grad F: Uh, reorganization status. Professor D: Re
  Question: What did the participants think about what constitutes a meeting?
  Answer:
output: The participants were skeptical that a two person conversation in the hallway constituted a meeting for their purposes. They thought that it would be okay to include this kind of data in their corpus for future researchers, but they should separate it. The Professor has a strong opinion that these interactions were not actually meetings.