input: Text: Grad F: OK. PhD C: Adam, what is the mike that, uh, Jeremy's wearing? Grad F: It's the ear - plug mike. Postdoc A: Ear - plug. PhD E: That's good. PhD C: Is that a wireless, or <unk>disfmarker<unk>? Oh. Grad F: No. Grad G: It's wired. Professor B: Oh! Postdoc A: Is that <unk>disfmarker<unk> Does that mean you can't hear anything during the meeting? Grad D: It's old - school. Grad F: Huh? What? Huh? Professor B: Should we, uh, close the door, maybe? Grad F: It <unk>disfmarker<unk> it's a fairly good mike, actually. Professor B: So it's <unk>disfmarker<unk> Yeah. Huh. Grad F: Well, I shouldn't say it's a good mike. All I really know is that the signal level is OK. I don't know if it's a <unk>disfmarker<unk> the quality. Professor B: Well, that's a Grad F: Ugh! So I didn't send out agenda items because until five minutes ago we only had one agenda item and now we have two. So. <unk>vocalsound<unk> And, uh. Professor B: OK. So, just to repeat the thing bef that we said last week, it was there's this suggestion of alternating weeks on <unk>vocalsound<unk> more, uh, automatic speech recognition related or not? Was that sort of <unk>pause<unk> the division? Grad F: Right. Professor B: So which week are we in? Grad F: Well <unk>disfmarker<unk> We haven't really started, but I thought we more <unk>disfmarker<unk> we more
  Question: What did Grad F think about getting consent?
  Answer:
output: Grad F was responsible for bringing up the topic. Apparently, no one had replied to the emails allowing people to bleep things out so far. According to Grad F, as long as the email was sent out, the team was covered. Grad F thought this had been settled when the project started and did not need to be revisited.