input: Text: Grad H: st Grad F: So we're on. Grad H: Yeah. That's better. Grad F: And, <unk>comment<unk> somewhere is my agenda. I think the most important thing is Morgan wanted to talk about, uh, the ARPA <unk>pause<unk> demo. Professor D: Well, so, here's the thing. Um, why don't we s again start off with <unk>disfmarker<unk> with, uh, Yeah, I 'll get it. I 'll get the door. Um, I think we want to start off with the agenda. And then, given that, uh, Liz and Andreas are gonna be <unk>pause<unk> ten, fifteen minutes late, we can try to figure out what we can do most effectively without them here. So <unk>disfmarker<unk> <unk>vocalsound<unk> So <unk>disfmarker<unk> so, one thing is, yeah, talk about demo, Grad F: OK. So, uh <unk>disfmarker<unk> uh, IBM transcription status, Professor D: IBM transcription. Uh, what else? Grad F: Professor D: What's SmartKom? SmartKom? Grad F: Uh, we wanna talk about if w if we wanna add the data to the mar Meeting Recorder corpus. PhD E: The data. The data which we are collecting here. Professor D: What <unk>disfmarker<unk> what <unk>disfmarker<unk> what are we collecting here? PhD E: Data? Grad F: So why don't we have that on the agenda and we 'll <unk>disfmarker<unk> we 'll get to it and talk about it? PhD E: The SmartKom data? Professor D: Yeah, right. PhD E: Yeah. Professor D: Uh, right. Uh. Grad F: Uh, reorganization status. Professor D: Reorganization status
  Question: What did PhD I think about segmentation?
  Answer:
output: PhD I thought that the team should re-evaluate recognition without cheating on the segmentation. PhD I explained to the team that they had so far been using a simplified version of the scoring and brought up that Thilo wanted to use recognizer alignments to train his speech detector. He was not sure how much hand labeling would be needed to generate data for the detector.