input: Text: Grad C: Yeah, we had a long discussion about how much w how easy we want to make it for people to bleep things out. So <unk>disfmarker<unk> Morgan wants to make it hard. PhD D: It <unk>disfmarker<unk> it doesn't <unk>disfmarker<unk> Grad C: Did <unk>disfmarker<unk> did <unk>disfmarker<unk> did it <unk>disfmarker<unk>? I didn't even check yesterday whether it was moving. PhD D: It didn't move yesterday either when I started it. Grad C: So. PhD D: So I don't know if it doesn't like both of us <unk>disfmarker<unk> Grad C: Channel three? Channel three? PhD D: You know, I discovered something yesterday on these, um, wireless ones. Grad B: Channel two. Grad C: Mm - hmm? PhD D: You can tell if it's picking up <unk>pause<unk> breath noise and stuff. Grad C: Yeah, it has a little indicator on it <unk>disfmarker<unk> on the AF. PhD D: Mm - hmm. So if you <unk>disfmarker<unk> yeah, if you breathe under <unk>disfmarker<unk> breathe and then you see AF go off, then you know <unk>pause<unk> it's p picking up your mouth noise. PhD F: Oh, that's good. Cuz we have a lot of breath noises. Grad C: Yep. Test. PhD F: In fact, if you listen to just the channels of people not talking, it's like " @ @ ". It's very disgust Grad C: What? Did you see Hannibal recently or something? PhD F: Sorry. Exactly. It's very disconcerting. OK. So, um, Grad C: PhD F: I was gonna try to get out of here, like, in half
  Question: Summarize the discussion about the disadvantages of ATLAS and other options
  Answer:
output: Since the team is familiar with Perl and a flat file format is easier, it was suggested that the cost of learning a new framework, like ATLAS, might be too high. It was suggested that ATLAS be used for the external file representation initially, and if it seems suitable, then it should be adopted in its entirety. P files were also discussed but the problem with them was that they could still get pretty big.