input: Text: PhD F: OK. Professor B: Uh. Somebody else should run this. I'm sick of being the one to sort of go through and say, " Well, what do you think about this? " You wanna <unk>disfmarker<unk>? PhD D: Yeah. PhD F: Should we take turns? You want me to run it today? Professor B: Yeah. Why don't you run it today? OK. PhD F: OK. OK. Um. Let's see, maybe we should just get a list of items <unk>disfmarker<unk> things that we should talk about. Um, I guess there's the usual <unk>pause<unk> updates, everybody going around and saying, uh, you know, what they're working on, the things that happened the last week. But aside from that is there anything in particular that anybody wants to bring up PhD D: Mmm. PhD F: for today? No? OK. So why don't we just around and people can give updates. PhD E: Oh. PhD F: Uh, do you want to start, Stephane? PhD C: Alright. Um. Well, the first thing maybe is that the p Eurospeech paper is, uh, accepted. Um. Yeah. PhD F: This is <unk>disfmarker<unk> what <unk>disfmarker<unk> what do you, uh <unk>disfmarker<unk> what's in the paper there? PhD C: So it's the paper that describe basically the, um, system that were proposed for the <unk>pause<unk> Aurora. PhD F: The one that we s we submitted the last round? PhD C: Right, yeah. PhD D: Yeah. PhD F: Uh - huh. PhD C: Um <unk>disfmarker<unk> Yeah. So and the, fff <unk>comment<unk> comments seems <unk>disfmarker<unk> from the reviewer are good. So.
  Question: What did the professor think about phase normalization?
  Answer:
output: The professor thought that the Broadcast News net could be scaled down. The big one took two to three weeks. Phase normalization experiments relied on it. He also suggested that the math can be simplified to just complex numbers.