input: Text: PhD E: OK. Professor B: OK, so <unk>pause<unk> We <unk>disfmarker<unk> we had a meeting with, uh <unk>disfmarker<unk> with Hynek, um, in <unk>disfmarker<unk> in which, uh, uh, Sunil and Stephane, uh <unk>vocalsound<unk> summarized where they were and <unk>disfmarker<unk> and, uh, talked about where we were gonna go. So that <unk>disfmarker<unk> that happened sort of mid - week. Uh. PhD E: D did <unk>disfmarker<unk> did you guys get your code pushed together? PhD D: Oh, yeah. Yeah. It's <unk>disfmarker<unk> it's <unk>disfmarker<unk> it's <unk>disfmarker<unk> it was updated yesterday, PhD E: Cool. PhD D: right? PhD A: Yeah. PhD D: Yeah. PhD A: You probably received the mail. PhD E: Oh, right, I saw <unk>disfmarker<unk> I saw the note. PhD A: Yeah. PhD E: Mm - hmm. Professor B: What was the update? PhD A: What was the update? So there is th then <unk>disfmarker<unk> the <unk>disfmarker<unk> all the new features that go in. Professor B: Yeah. PhD A: The, um, noise suppression, the re - synthesis of speech after suppression. These are the <unk>disfmarker<unk> PhD E: Is the, um <unk>disfmarker<unk> the CVS mechanism working <unk>pause<unk> well? PhD A: Yeah. PhD E: Are <unk>disfmarker<unk> are people, uh, up at OGI grabbing code uh, via that? PhD D: Uh, I don't think <unk>disfmarker<unk> I don't think
  Question: What did the team discuss about insertion penalties?
  Answer:
output: The Aurora staff was tinkering around with various parameters, like the insertion penalty. The professor expressed interest in knowing what the exact penalties were to make decision about the team's models.