input: Text: PhD E: Yeah. Professor B: Um, so. If we can't, we can't. But uh we're gonna try to make this an abbreviated meeting cuz the <unk>disfmarker<unk> the next <unk>disfmarker<unk> next occupants were pushing for it, so. Um. So. Agenda is <unk>disfmarker<unk> according to this, is transcription status, DARPA demos XML tools, disks, backups, et cetera and Grad H: Does anyone have anything to <unk>pause<unk> add to the agenda? Professor B: OK. Should we just go in order? Transcription status? Who's <unk>disfmarker<unk> that's probably you. Postdoc A: I can do that quickly. Um I hired several more transcribers, They're making great progress. Professor B: Seven? Postdoc A: Seve - several, several. Professor B: Oh. Postdoc A: And uh <unk>disfmarker<unk> and uh, uh I've been uh finishing up the uh double checking. I hoped to have had that done by today but it's gonna take one more week. Grad H: Um PhD D: I g Grad H: as a somewhat segue into the next topic, um could I get a hold of uh the data even if it's not really corrected yet just so I can get the data formats and make sure the information retrieval stuff is working? Postdoc A: Certainly. Yeah I mean, it's in the same place it's been. Grad H: So can you just <unk>disfmarker<unk> Oh, it is. Postdoc A: Uh - huh. No change. Grad H: OK. Just <unk>disfmarker<unk> So, " transcripts " is the sub - directory? Postdoc A: Uh <unk>disfmarker<unk> Yes
  Question: What did Grad G think about meeting data quality?
  Answer:
output: Grad G thought that it would be important to collect seat information in the key files to know where someone was sitting. This would be useful when people had to be bleeped out upon being heard in someone else's microphone. Grad G wanted to figure out what seating arrangements led to other participants' voices showing up in the microphone.