input: Text: Professor B: Are we on? We're on. OK. PhD E: Is it on? PhD D: Yeah. Professor B: Yeah. OK, PhD D: One, two <unk>disfmarker<unk> u OK. PhD A: Why is it so cold in here? Professor B: so, uh, we haven't sent around the agenda. So, i uh, any agenda items anybody has, wants to talk about, what's going on? Postdoc G: I c I could talk about the meeting. Grad H: Does everyone <unk>disfmarker<unk> has everyone met Don? Postdoc G: Yeah. Professor B: It's on? PhD C: Now, yeah. PhD D: Yeah. Grad H: Yeah? OK. PhD D: Yeah. Grad F: Hello. Professor B: OK, agenda item one, PhD D: We went <unk>disfmarker<unk> Grad F: Yeah. Professor B: introduce Don. OK, we did that. Uh <unk>disfmarker<unk> PhD A: Well, I had a <unk>disfmarker<unk> just a quick question but I know there was discussion of it at a previous meeting that I missed, but just about the <unk>disfmarker<unk> the wish list item of getting good quality close - talking mikes on every speaker. Professor B: OK, so let's <unk>disfmarker<unk> let's <unk>disfmarker<unk> So let's just do agenda <unk>pause<unk> building right now. OK, so let's talk about that a bit. PhD A: I mean, that was <unk>disfmarker<unk> Professor B: Uh, @ @ tuss close talking mikes, better quality. OK, <unk>vocalsound<unk> uh, we can talk about that. You were gonna <unk>disfmarker<unk> starting to say something? Postdoc G: Well, you <unk>disfmarker<unk>
  Question: Summarize the meeting
  Answer:
output: The group discussed recording equipment and setup issues, recent developments in the transcription effort, other potential types of tagging to be assigned to transcribers, and the post-processing of waveforms. The discussion was largely focused on efforts to facilitate transcriptions, including the improvement of strategies for transcribing overlapping speech, and achieving greater uniformity in the type of equipment used during recordings and the manner in which recording devices are worn by speakers.