input: Text: Project Manager: So <unk>disfmarker<unk> Hello. <unk>vocalsound<unk> Marketing: Good afternoon. Sorry I'm a little late. Project Manager: No problem. Marketing: Got stuck in the traffic. Project Manager: Okay. <unk>vocalsound<unk> User Interface: <unk>vocalsound<unk> Industrial Designer: <unk>vocalsound<unk> Project Manager: That's possible on uh this time of day. Starts at three o'clock. Uh <unk>disfmarker<unk> <unk>vocalsound<unk> Marketing: Yeah. Project Manager: Uh, let me see. Our fourth and last meeting. There he is. Yes. Okay this our last meeting. In this meeting we will discuss our final design. And we will do some evaluation about the, not only the product, but also the project. And then we're going to close the project today as well. So after this you will be uh free to go and uh spend all your money. <unk>vocalsound<unk> User Interface: <unk>vocalsound<unk> Industrial Designer: <unk>vocalsound<unk> Marketing: <unk>vocalsound<unk> <unk>vocalsound<unk> Project Manager: And this uh design, detailed design meeting uh we will discuss uh the look-and-feel of the design, the usability interface design, and we will do the product evaluation. Um, in order to do that we have this agenda. We'll have the prototype presentation first. Then we will set up some evaluation cri um criteria. <unk>vocalsound<unk> Then we will look at the finance. Uh we will have to see if everything we wanna do is also possible within our budget. Because everything costs money, and the more functions you wanna have the more money it will cost. So we have to see if it fits within the twelve and a half Euro per remote. But we will see that later. Then we will do the project uh evaluation, and the closing after that. Industrial Designer: <unk>vocalsound<unk> Project Manager: We've got forty minutes. So we will
  Question: What specific criteria did Marketing bring forward for product evaluation?
  Answer:
output: On the basis of literature study and requirements analysis carried out by Marketing, specific criteria were as follows: design innovation, learnability, functionality, utility, cost, target customer, recognizability, etc. After the group brought forward a score for each in sequence, the total score was calculated as 84%, which was acknowledged as a nice score.