input: Text: PhD F: OK. Professor B: Uh. Somebody else should run this. I'm sick of being the one to sort of go through and say, " Well, what do you think about this? " You wanna <unk>disfmarker<unk>? PhD D: Yeah. PhD F: Should we take turns? You want me to run it today? Professor B: Yeah. Why don't you run it today? OK. PhD F: OK. OK. Um. Let's see, maybe we should just get a list of items <unk>disfmarker<unk> things that we should talk about. Um, I guess there's the usual <unk>pause<unk> updates, everybody going around and saying, uh, you know, what they're working on, the things that happened the last week. But aside from that is there anything in particular that anybody wants to bring up PhD D: Mmm. PhD F: for today? No? OK. So why don't we just around and people can give updates. PhD E: Oh. PhD F: Uh, do you want to start, Stephane? PhD C: Alright. Um. Well, the first thing maybe is that the p Eurospeech paper is, uh, accepted. Um. Yeah. PhD F: This is <unk>disfmarker<unk> what <unk>disfmarker<unk> what do you, uh <unk>disfmarker<unk> what's in the paper there? PhD C: So it's the paper that describe basically the, um, system that were proposed for the <unk>pause<unk> Aurora. PhD F: The one that we s we submitted the last round? PhD C: Right, yeah. PhD D: Yeah. PhD F: Uh - huh. PhD C: Um <unk>disfmarker<unk> Yeah. So and the, fff <unk>comment<unk> comments seems <unk>disfmarker<unk> from the review
  Question: Summarize the discussion on the Eurospeech paper and on-line normalization
  Answer:
output: PhD C informed the team that the Eurospeech paper had been accepted and the conference would take place in Aalborg Denmark in September. The team was making progress on on-line normalization, taking two approaches.