input: Text: Grad F: OK. PhD C: Adam, what is the mike that, uh, Jeremy's wearing? Grad F: It's the ear - plug mike. Postdoc A: Ear - plug. PhD E: That's good. PhD C: Is that a wireless, or <unk>disfmarker<unk>? Oh. Grad F: No. Grad G: It's wired. Professor B: Oh! Postdoc A: Is that <unk>disfmarker<unk> Does that mean you can't hear anything during the meeting? Grad D: It's old - school. Grad F: Huh? What? Huh? Professor B: Should we, uh, close the door, maybe? Grad F: It <unk>disfmarker<unk> it's a fairly good mike, actually. Professor B: So it's <unk>disfmarker<unk> Yeah. Huh. Grad F: Well, I shouldn't say it's a good mike. All I really know is that the signal level is OK. I don't know if it's a <unk>disfmarker<unk> the quality. Professor B: Well, that's a Grad F: Ugh! So I didn't send out agenda items because until five minutes ago we only had one agenda item and now we have two. So. <unk>vocalsound<unk> And, uh. Professor B: OK. So, just to repeat the thing bef that we said last week, it was there's this suggestion of alternating weeks on <unk>vocalsound<unk> more, uh, automatic speech recognition related or not? Was that sort of <unk>pause<unk> the division? Grad F: Right. Professor B: So which week are we in? Grad F: Well <unk>disfmarker<unk> We haven't really started, but I thought we more <unk>disf
  Question: What did the team think about sending an email to ask for changes?
  Answer:
output: The team thought that people would not respond to their emails, which would be compounded by them being out of town over the summer. Based on knowledge about similar data collection, they thought that emails should be enough, but skepticism about getting consent with emails prevailed.