input: Text: Marketing: I wanna find our if our remote works. Project Manager: Me too. <unk>vocalsound<unk> Marketing: Oh. <unk>vocalsound<unk> Project Manager: Okay. Um here's the agenda for our last meeting. Marketing: Whoohoo. Project Manager: Um after the opening we're going to have a prototype presentation, then we're going to discuss the evaluation criteria and the financing of our remote. Then we're going to evaluate the product and I think the whole production process, and then we're gonna close it up, and we have forty minutes, so let's get started. Oh, no, let's have the prototype presentation. Industrial Designer: Mm 'kay, User Interface: <unk>gap<unk> Industrial Designer: you ready? User Interface: Um sure. You or me? Industrial Designer: Y you read that stuff, since you wrote it. User Interface: Okay. Well, since our materials aren't exactly what we were going for, I'm just gonna translate what this all means for you. Industrial Designer: I'll be the Vanna. User Interface: <unk>vocalsound<unk> The base is gonna be gunmetal gray, which is what we had decided, and it's gonna be plastic. Um then there's the latex cover, which is what you see as red. Um because it can be replaceable, we just kinda went with the colour. Project Manager: Right. User Interface: Um and then the buttons are actually kind of poking through rather than on top. Um and the buttons will be a l much lighter blue, almost see-through. Project Manager: Hmm. User Interface: It's just sort of a very pale blue and a light-up yellow. Marketing: That's nice. Project Manager: Yeah. User Interface: The whole thing lights up if you press any button, rather than it <unk>disfmarker<unk> just that one button will light up. Marketing: Good. User Interface: Um
  Question: Describe the team's discussion and evaluating process on whether the remote was technologically innovative.
  Answer:
output: Marketing first wanted to check whether the remote was going to have the phrase recognition function. This function was not reflected on the model they were seeing, but User Interface and Industrial Designer confirmed that it could be realized with a special chip. Marketing thus decided that the remote was technologically innovative enough. Since the remote was only designed for TVs, it was rated 3 by Marketing, 3 or 4 by Project Manager, and 4 by User Interface. With an average of 3.5, they agreed that the remote had reasonable technological innovation and was sufficient for their project.