input: Text: PhD A: OK, we're going. PhD D: Damn. Professor C: And uh Hans - uh, Hans - Guenter will be here, um, I think by next <unk>disfmarker<unk> next Tuesday or so. PhD B: Oh, OK. PhD D: Mm - hmm. Professor C: So he's <unk>disfmarker<unk> he's going to be here for about three weeks, PhD B: Oh! That's nice. PhD A: Just for a visit? Professor C: and, uh <unk>disfmarker<unk> Uh, we 'll see. PhD A: Huh. Professor C: We might <unk>disfmarker<unk> might end up with some longer collaboration or something. PhD A: Cool. Professor C: So he's gonna look in on everything we're doing PhD D: Mm - hmm. Professor C: and give us his <unk>disfmarker<unk> his thoughts. And so it 'll be another <unk>disfmarker<unk> another good person looking at things. PhD B: Oh. Hmm. Grad E: Th - that's his spectral subtraction group? Professor C: Yeah, Grad E: Is that right? Professor C: yeah. Grad E: Oh, OK. So I guess I should probably talk to him a bit too? Professor C: Oh, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. No, he 'll be around for three weeks. He's, uh, um, very, very, easygoing, easy to talk to, and, uh, very interested in everything. PhD A: Really nice guy. Professor C: Yeah, yeah. PhD B: Yeah, we met him in Amsterdam. Professor C: Yeah, yeah, he's been here before. PhD B: Oh, OK. Professor C: I
  Question: What did Grad E think about the goal of his experiment?
  Answer:
output: Grad E thought that the idea of doing mean log magnitude spectral subtraction was figuring out the effect of training time on the model performance. It seemed that longer times had diminishing returns after a certain point.