input: Text: Grad A: OK, this is one channel. Can you uh, say your name and talk into your mike one at a time? PhD C: This is Eric on channel three, I believe. Grad A: OK. Uh, I don't think it's on there, Jane. Undergrad D: Tasting one two three, tasting. Postdoc E: OK, this is Jane on channel five. Grad A: Uh, I still don't see you Jane. Postdoc E: Oh, darn, what am I doing wrong? Undergrad D: Can you see me on channel four? Really? Grad A: Yeah, I s Undergrad D: My lucky day. Postdoc E: Uh, screen no, <unk>disfmarker<unk> it is, oh, maybe it just warmed up? Grad A: No. Postdoc E: Oh, darn, can you can't see channel five yet? Grad A: Uh, well, the mike isn't close enough to your mouth, so. Postdoc E: Oh, this would be k OK, is that better? Grad A: S uh, try speaking loudly, Undergrad D: I like the high quality labelling. Grad A: so, Postdoc E: Hello, Grad A: OK, good. Undergrad D: David, can we borrow your labelling machine to improve the quality of the labelling a little bit here? Postdoc E: hello. Alright. Grad A: Thank you. PhD B: One t Undergrad D: How <unk>disfmarker<unk> how many are there, one to five? PhD B: One five, yeah. Undergrad D: Yeah, please. Postdoc E: Would you like to join the meeting? Grad A: Well, we don't wanna renumber them, Postdoc E: I bet <unk>disfmarker<unk> Grad A: cuz we've already have like,
  Question: What did the team think about DAT?
  Answer:
output: Santa Barbara had released a corpus recently that had many styles of speech. The project used DAT recorders and had a lot of far field recordings. The recording in general were very clean.