input: Text: PhD A: OK, we're on. Professor C: OK, what are we talking about today? PhD B: I don't know. Do you have news from the conference talk? Uh, that was programmed for yesterday <unk>disfmarker<unk> I guess. Professor C: Uh <unk>disfmarker<unk> PhD D: Yesterday Professor C: Uh <unk>disfmarker<unk> PhD D: Yesterday morning on video conference. Professor C: Uh, PhD B: Well Professor C: oh, I'm sorry. Grad E: Oh. Conference call. Professor C: I know <unk>disfmarker<unk> now I know what you're talking about. No, nobody's told me anything. PhD B: Alright. PhD A: Oh, this was the, uh, talk where they were supposed to try to decide <unk>disfmarker<unk> PhD B: To <unk>disfmarker<unk> to decide what to do, PhD A: Ah, right. PhD B: yeah. PhD D: Yeah. Professor C: Yeah. No, that would have been a good thing to find out before this meeting, that's. No, I have no <unk>disfmarker<unk> I have no idea. Um, Uh, so I mean, let's <unk>disfmarker<unk> let's assume for right now that we're just kind of plugging on ahead, PhD B: Yeah. Professor C: because even if they tell us that, uh, the rules are different, uh, we're still interested in doing what we're doing. So what are you doing? PhD B: Mm - hmm. Uh, well, we've <unk>disfmarker<unk> a little bit worked on trying to see, uh, what were the bugs and the problem with the latencies. PhD D: To improve <unk>disfmarker<unk> PhD B: So, We took
  Question: Summarize the meeting
  Answer:
output: The meeting was about various approaches that the team could pursue for further research. The team initially discussed the delay between the frequency bands which was causing problems in the model deployment. They then discussed how spectral subtraction could help various tasks. The meeting ended with more ideas on improving the model, like directionality of voice and looking at smaller units of sound in recordings.