input: Text: Professor B: Is it starting now? PhD E: Yep. Professor B: So what <unk>disfmarker<unk> what <unk>disfmarker<unk> from <unk>disfmarker<unk> what <unk>disfmarker<unk> Grad A: Hello? Professor B: Whatever we say from now on, it can be held against us, right? PhD E: That's right. Professor B: and uh Grad A: It's your right to remain silent. Professor B: Yeah. So I <unk>disfmarker<unk> I <unk>disfmarker<unk> the <unk>disfmarker<unk> the problem is that I actually don't know how th these held meetings are held, if they are very informal and sort of just people are say what's going on PhD E: Yeah. Professor B: and PhD E: Yeah, that's usually what we do. Professor B: OK. PhD E: We just sorta go around and people say what's going on, what's the latest uh <unk>disfmarker<unk> Professor B: Yeah. OK. So I guess that what may be a <unk>disfmarker<unk> reasonable is if I uh first make a report on what's happening in Aurora in general, at least what from my perspective. PhD E: Yeah. That would be great. Professor B: And <unk>disfmarker<unk> and uh so, I <unk>disfmarker<unk> I think that Carmen and Stephane reported on uh Amsterdam meeting, PhD D: Uh o Professor B: which was kind of interesting because it was for the first time we realized we are not friends really, but we are competitors. Cuz until then it was sort of like everything was like wonderful and <unk>disfmarker<unk> PhD E: Yeah. It seemed like there were still some issues, Professor B: Yeah. PhD E: right? that they were trying to decide? Professor B: There is a plenty of <unk>disfmarker<unk> there're plenty of issues. PhD E: Like the voice
  Question: Summarize the meeting
  Answer:
output: The meeting focused on the Aurora project. The Professor began with some updates on how certain decisions made by those leading the project did not make sense. There was some confusion and debate about how to move forward. The team then moved onto a discussion about measuring the effect of a given feature on the model. The professor outlined the specific methodology. At the time, the team was focused on testing for C-zero and C-one only, but they decided to expand their testing. Finally, the professor told some stories to explain future directions and the team had a brief discussion about their hardware.