input: Text: Professor A: OK. Grad B: OK we're on and we seem to be working. PhD C: Yes. Professor A: OK. Grad B: We didn't crash <unk>disfmarker<unk> we're not crashing anymore PhD C: One, two, three, four, f Grad B: and it really bothers me. Professor A: Yeah? PhD C: No crashing. PhD G: I do. I crashed when I started this morning. Grad B: You crashed <unk>disfmarker<unk> crashed this morning? I did not crash this morning. PhD C: Yeah? Professor A: Oh! Well maybe it's just, you know, how many t u u u u how many times you crash in a day. PhD G: Really? Yeah. Maybe, yeah. Professor A: First time <unk>disfmarker<unk> first time in the day, you know. PhD G: Or maybe it's once you've <unk>pause<unk> done enough meetings <unk>comment<unk> it won't crash on you anymore. PhD E: Yeah. PhD C: No? Postdoc F: Yeah. PhD G: It's a matter of experience. PhD E: Yeah. Professor A: Yeah. Postdoc F: Self - learning, yeah. Professor A: That's <unk>disfmarker<unk> that's great. PhD G: Yeah. Professor A: Uh. PhD C: Yeah. Professor A: Do we have an agenda? Liz <unk>disfmarker<unk> Liz and Andreas can't sh can't <unk>disfmarker<unk> uh, can't come. Grad B: I do. Professor A: So, they won't be here. Grad B: I have agenda and it's all me. PhD G: Did <unk>disfmarker<unk> Grad B: Cuz no one sent me anything else. PhD G: Did they send, uh, the messages to you about the meeting today? Grad
  Question: What was the meeting about?
  Answer:
output: The group talked about the status of the first test set of digits data, naming conventions for files, speaker identification tags, and encoding files with details about the recording. The group also discussed a proposal for a grant from the NSF's ITR (Information Technology Research) program, transcriptions, and efforts by speaker mn005 to detect speaker overlap using harmonicity-related features. Particular focus was paid to questions about transcription procedures, i.e. how to deal with overlooked backchannels, and audible breaths.