input: Text: Grad G: Time. Grad C: Thanks. Grad G: Are you Fey? Undergrad D: I am Fey, yeah. Grad G: Oh. Grad B: What day is today? Undergrad D: Hi. Grad G: Hi. I think we've met before, like, I remember talking to you about Aspect or something like that at some point or other. Undergrad D: A couple times yeah. Grad F: It's the uh twenty <unk>disfmarker<unk> nineteenth. Grad B: Nineteenth? Undergrad D: That's right, yeah. Grad G: So. Undergrad D: And you were my GSI briefly, until I dropped the class. Grad F: Grad B: Right, right. Grad G: Oh that's right. Undergrad D: But. Grad G: Well. Grad C: OK, wh wh Grad G: No offense. Grad C: Yeah. Grad G: Like. Grad C: OK. Some in some introductions are in order. Grad G: Oh, OK sorry. Grad C: OK. Grad G: Getting ahead of myself. Grad C: So. Um. For those who don't know <unk>disfmarker<unk> Everyone knows me, this is great. Um, apart from that, sort of the old gang, Johno and Bhaskara have been with us from <unk>disfmarker<unk> from day one Grad G: Yay! Grad E: Hi. Grad C: and um they're engaged in <unk>disfmarker<unk> in various activities, some of which you will hear about today. Ami is um our counselor and spiritual guidance and um also interested in problems concerning reference of the more complex type, PhD A: Well. Grad E: Oh wow. Grad C: and um he sits in as a interested participant and helper. Is that a good characterization? PhD A: u That's pretty good, I think. Grad C: I don't know
  Question: What did Grad C think about the SPG schema?
  Answer:
output: Grad C thought an approach in which the model had to refer to parents seemed inefficient. The model would constantly have to go back. Grad C wanted to completely redo it, even if it meant throwing away what the team had developed thus far.