input: Text: PhD E: OK. Professor B: OK, so <unk>pause<unk> We <unk>disfmarker<unk> we had a meeting with, uh <unk>disfmarker<unk> with Hynek, um, in <unk>disfmarker<unk> in which, uh, uh, Sunil and Stephane, uh <unk>vocalsound<unk> summarized where they were and <unk>disfmarker<unk> and, uh, talked about where we were gonna go. So that <unk>disfmarker<unk> that happened sort of mid - week. Uh. PhD E: D did <unk>disfmarker<unk> did you guys get your code pushed together? PhD D: Oh, yeah. Yeah. It's <unk>disfmarker<unk> it's <unk>disfmarker<unk> it's <unk>disfmarker<unk> it was updated yesterday, PhD E: Cool. PhD D: right? PhD A: Yeah. PhD D: Yeah. PhD A: You probably received the mail. PhD E: Oh, right, I saw <unk>disfmarker<unk> I saw the note. PhD A: Yeah. PhD E: Mm - hmm. Professor B: What was the update? PhD A: What was the update? So there is th then <unk>disfmarker<unk> the <unk>disfmarker<unk> all the new features that go in. Professor B: Yeah. PhD A: The, um, noise suppression, the re - synthesis of speech after suppression. These are the <unk>disfmarker<unk> PhD E: Is the, um <unk>disfmarker<unk> the CVS mechanism working <unk>pause<unk> well? PhD A: Yeah. PhD E: Are <unk>disfmarker<unk> are people, uh, up at OGI grabbing code uh, via that? PhD D: Uh, I don't think <unk>disfmarker<unk> I don't think <unk>
  Question: What did the team discuss about evaluation?
  Answer:
output: The professor informed the team that the evaluation was on November 13. He encouraged the team to run experiments to learn which factors were the most important. The team was concerned about how the evaluation would be weighted, but they did not expect it to be significantly different. There was a chance that the evaluation would be pushed.