input: Text: PhD E: Yeah. Professor B: Um, so. If we can't, we can't. But uh we're gonna try to make this an abbreviated meeting cuz the <unk>disfmarker<unk> the next <unk>disfmarker<unk> next occupants were pushing for it, so. Um. So. Agenda is <unk>disfmarker<unk> according to this, is transcription status, DARPA demos XML tools, disks, backups, et cetera and Grad H: Does anyone have anything to <unk>pause<unk> add to the agenda? Professor B: OK. Should we just go in order? Transcription status? Who's <unk>disfmarker<unk> that's probably you. Postdoc A: I can do that quickly. Um I hired several more transcribers, They're making great progress. Professor B: Seven? Postdoc A: Seve - several, several. Professor B: Oh. Postdoc A: And uh <unk>disfmarker<unk> and uh, uh I've been uh finishing up the uh double checking. I hoped to have had that done by today but it's gonna take one more week. Grad H: Um PhD D: I g Grad H: as a somewhat segue into the next topic, um could I get a hold of uh the data even if it's not really corrected yet just so I can get the data formats and make sure the information retrieval stuff is working? Postdoc A: Certainly. Yeah I mean, it's in the same place it's been. Grad H: So can you just <unk>disfmarker<unk> Oh, it is. Postdoc A: Uh - huh. No change. Grad H: OK. Just <unk>disfmarker<unk> So, " transcripts " is the sub - directory? Postdoc A: Uh <unk>disf
  Question: Summarize the discussion on XML tools and meeting data quality
  Answer:
output: The team had started moving to XML as their general format to standardize their data. Though, there is still concern about the limitations of XML. The participants noted that sometimes the mic of one subject catches sound from another. They also discussed implementing tools to help participants know when the quality of their audio is bad.