input: Text: Professor B: Is it starting now? PhD E: Yep. Professor B: So what <unk>disfmarker<unk> what <unk>disfmarker<unk> from <unk>disfmarker<unk> what <unk>disfmarker<unk> Grad A: Hello? Professor B: Whatever we say from now on, it can be held against us, right? PhD E: That's right. Professor B: and uh Grad A: It's your right to remain silent. Professor B: Yeah. So I <unk>disfmarker<unk> I <unk>disfmarker<unk> the <unk>disfmarker<unk> the problem is that I actually don't know how th these held meetings are held, if they are very informal and sort of just people are say what's going on PhD E: Yeah. Professor B: and PhD E: Yeah, that's usually what we do. Professor B: OK. PhD E: We just sorta go around and people say what's going on, what's the latest uh <unk>disfmarker<unk> Professor B: Yeah. OK. So I guess that what may be a <unk>disfmarker<unk> reasonable is if I uh first make a report on what's happening in Aurora in general, at least what from my perspective. PhD E: Yeah. That would be great. Professor B: And <unk>disfmarker<unk> and uh so, I <unk>disfmarker<unk> I think that Carmen and Stephane reported on uh Amsterdam meeting, PhD D: Uh o Professor B: which was kind of interesting because it was for the first time we realized we are not friends really, but we are competitors. Cuz until then it was sort of like everything was like wonderful and <unk>disfmarker<unk> PhD E: Yeah. It seemed like there were still some issues, Professor B: Yeah. PhD E: right? that they were trying to decide? Professor B: There is a plenty of <unk>disfmarker<unk> there're plenty of issues. PhD E
  Question: What did the Professor say about the soldiers?
  Answer:
output: The professor told the group a story about soldiers assigned to watch out for spy planes. The plane showed up at four each day and the soldiers called it in. Once the pattern was clear, they stopped looking for it and spent time with the locals instead. One day, the plane did not come but the soldiers still reported it, so they got into trouble. The professor used the story to make a point about making an assumption and then seeing if it holds after changing something small.