input: Text: Professor B: Is it starting now? PhD E: Yep. Professor B: So what <unk>disfmarker<unk> what <unk>disfmarker<unk> from <unk>disfmarker<unk> what <unk>disfmarker<unk> Grad A: Hello? Professor B: Whatever we say from now on, it can be held against us, right? PhD E: That's right. Professor B: and uh Grad A: It's your right to remain silent. Professor B: Yeah. So I <unk>disfmarker<unk> I <unk>disfmarker<unk> the <unk>disfmarker<unk> the problem is that I actually don't know how th these held meetings are held, if they are very informal and sort of just people are say what's going on PhD E: Yeah. Professor B: and PhD E: Yeah, that's usually what we do. Professor B: OK. PhD E: We just sorta go around and people say what's going on, what's the latest uh <unk>disfmarker<unk> Professor B: Yeah. OK. So I guess that what may be a <unk>disfmarker<unk> reasonable is if I uh first make a report on what's happening in Aurora in general, at least what from my perspective. PhD E: Yeah. That would be great. Professor B: And <unk>disfmarker<unk> and uh so, I <unk>disfmarker<unk> I think that Carmen and Stephane reported on uh Amsterdam meeting, PhD D: Uh o Professor B: which was kind of interesting because it was for the first time we realized we are not friends really, but we are competitors. Cuz until then it was sort of like everything was like wonderful and <unk>disfmarker<unk> PhD E: Yeah. It seemed like there were still some issues, Professor B: Yeah. PhD E: right? that they were trying to decide? Professor B: There is a plenty of <unk>disfmarker<unk> there're plenty of issues. PhD E
  Question: What did the professor think about carriage returns?
  Answer:
output: The professor told a story about how people could pretend to be working by consuming computer memory without doing anything useful. He recounted a story about a company that was paid by the U.S. government based on the amount of computer time they used. The company ran a useless program to rack up computer time.