input: Text: PhD E: Yeah. Professor B: Um, so. If we can't, we can't. But uh we're gonna try to make this an abbreviated meeting cuz the <unk>disfmarker<unk> the next <unk>disfmarker<unk> next occupants were pushing for it, so. Um. So. Agenda is <unk>disfmarker<unk> according to this, is transcription status, DARPA demos XML tools, disks, backups, et cetera and Grad H: Does anyone have anything to <unk>pause<unk> add to the agenda? Professor B: OK. Should we just go in order? Transcription status? Who's <unk>disfmarker<unk> that's probably you. Postdoc A: I can do that quickly. Um I hired several more transcribers, They're making great progress. Professor B: Seven? Postdoc A: Seve - several, several. Professor B: Oh. Postdoc A: And uh <unk>disfmarker<unk> and uh, uh I've been uh finishing up the uh double checking. I hoped to have had that done by today but it's gonna take one more week. Grad H: Um PhD D: I g Grad H: as a somewhat segue into the next topic, um could I get a hold of uh the data even if it's not really corrected yet just so I can get the data formats and make sure the information retrieval stuff is working? Postdoc A: Certainly. Yeah I mean, it's in the same place it's been. Grad H: So can you just <unk>disfmarker<unk> Oh, it is. Postdoc A: Uh - huh. No change. Grad H: OK. Just <unk>disfmarker<unk> So, " transcripts " is the sub - directory? Postdoc A: Uh <unk>disfmark
  Question: Summarize the discussion on backups and collecting notes with meetings
  Answer:
output: The team agreed that it was important to keep good backups. Their main concern was the time difference between getting more disks and recording new meetings. They did not want to rely on burning CD's at all because of potential loss of data. They also started discussing whether it would be a good idea to collect meeting notes from the participants as well, but that would entail installing new infrastructure.