input: Text: Grad G: Time. Grad C: Thanks. Grad G: Are you Fey? Undergrad D: I am Fey, yeah. Grad G: Oh. Grad B: What day is today? Undergrad D: Hi. Grad G: Hi. I think we've met before, like, I remember talking to you about Aspect or something like that at some point or other. Undergrad D: A couple times yeah. Grad F: It's the uh twenty <unk>disfmarker<unk> nineteenth. Grad B: Nineteenth? Undergrad D: That's right, yeah. Grad G: So. Undergrad D: And you were my GSI briefly, until I dropped the class. Grad F: Grad B: Right, right. Grad G: Oh that's right. Undergrad D: But. Grad G: Well. Grad C: OK, wh wh Grad G: No offense. Grad C: Yeah. Grad G: Like. Grad C: OK. Some in some introductions are in order. Grad G: Oh, OK sorry. Grad C: OK. Grad G: Getting ahead of myself. Grad C: So. Um. For those who don't know <unk>disfmarker<unk> Everyone knows me, this is great. Um, apart from that, sort of the old gang, Johno and Bhaskara have been with us from <unk>disfmarker<unk> from day one Grad G: Yay! Grad E: Hi. Grad C: and um they're engaged in <unk>disfmarker<unk> in various activities, some of which you will hear about today. Ami is um our counselor and spiritual guidance and um also interested in problems concerning reference of the more complex type, PhD A: Well. Grad E: Oh wow. Grad C: and um he sits in as a interested participant and helper. Is that a good characterization? PhD A: u That's pretty good, I think. Grad C: I don't
  Question: What did Grad G think about capturing the subject intention?
  Answer:
output: Grad G learned that the materials would be based on real materials about Heidelberg and that the instructor would allow subjects to get a feel for the system's capabilities. Grad G also learned that the interactions would be more natural.