input: Text: Project Manager: Welcome back. Industrial Designer: I'm sorry to be late. Project Manager: Welcome back everybody. User Interface: Yeah. Thanks. Project Manager: So this meeting agenda will be the detailed design meeting. And uh opening and uh P_M_s <unk>gap<unk> of the meet minutes, uh prototype presentation from uh Christine and uh Agnes. Industrial Designer: Agnes, yes. Project Manager: Yes and uh evaluation criteria. The finance, it's uh from my side, from the management, and uh production evaluation. Then uh closing. So we have forty minutes to discuss and uh finalise and close the product and project and to move further, okay, so <unk>disfmarker<unk> Okay, let's talk about uh maybe first uh for the prototype. User Interface: Mm, okay. Project Manager: So I handle to <unk>disfmarker<unk> User Interface: I've done a presentation, but it pretty much covers work that we've both done, so if I'm missing anything, Christine can just correct me. Project Manager: So shall I go to <unk>disfmarker<unk> sorry. Industrial Designer: Uh thank you, so you did a PowerPoint presentation, good for you. <unk>vocalsound<unk> Project Manager: Yep. S Okay, let's go to A_M_I_. User Interface: <unk>vocalsound<unk> It's not the biggest PowerPoint presentation in the world, but <unk>disfmarker<unk> Industrial Designer: <unk>vocalsound<unk> Marketing: <unk>vocalsound<unk> Project Manager: <unk>vocalsound<unk> So in two or three or <unk>disfmarker<unk> Industrial Designer: <unk>vocalsound<unk> User Interface: Three. Um. <unk>vocalsound<unk> No it's <unk>disfmarker<unk> Marketing: Probably. Technical pa I would think. User Interface: think it's the last one. No, then this is
  Question: Why did User Interface disagree when talking about the redesign after product evaluation?
  Answer:
output: Because User Interface thought there should be a turnaround time between product evaluation and its formal release. User Interface believed that many products had been released to the market without being properly user-tested and didn't receive positive results, so the remote control should be minimally tested before redesigned and fine-tuned to suit a general range of requirements according to the feedback from product evaluation.