input: Text: Grad F: OK. PhD C: Adam, what is the mike that, uh, Jeremy's wearing? Grad F: It's the ear - plug mike. Postdoc A: Ear - plug. PhD E: That's good. PhD C: Is that a wireless, or <unk>disfmarker<unk>? Oh. Grad F: No. Grad G: It's wired. Professor B: Oh! Postdoc A: Is that <unk>disfmarker<unk> Does that mean you can't hear anything during the meeting? Grad D: It's old - school. Grad F: Huh? What? Huh? Professor B: Should we, uh, close the door, maybe? Grad F: It <unk>disfmarker<unk> it's a fairly good mike, actually. Professor B: So it's <unk>disfmarker<unk> Yeah. Huh. Grad F: Well, I shouldn't say it's a good mike. All I really know is that the signal level is OK. I don't know if it's a <unk>disfmarker<unk> the quality. Professor B: Well, that's a Grad F: Ugh! So I didn't send out agenda items because until five minutes ago we only had one agenda item and now we have two. So. <unk>vocalsound<unk> And, uh. Professor B: OK. So, just to repeat the thing bef that we said last week, it was there's this suggestion of alternating weeks on <unk>vocalsound<unk> more, uh, automatic speech recognition related or not? Was that sort of <unk>pause<unk> the division? Grad F: Right. Professor B: So which week are we in? Grad F: Well <unk>disfmarker<unk> We haven't really started, but I thought we more
  Question: Summarize the discussion about releasing meeting data and allowing people to cut things out
  Answer:
output: The team decided to release their data on July 15th, but they still wanted to give people time to bleep things from the transcripts. There was skepticism that they could actually reach out to people and get everyone's consent that they were okay with whatever was being released.