input: Text: PhD A: Eh, we should be going. Professor B: So ne next week we 'll have, uh, both Birger <unk>pause<unk> and, uh, Mike <unk>disfmarker<unk> Michael <unk>disfmarker<unk> Michael Kleinschmidt and Birger Kollmeier will join us. PhD D: Uh - huh. Professor B: Um, and you're <unk>disfmarker<unk> <unk>vocalsound<unk> you're probably gonna go up in a couple <unk>disfmarker<unk> three weeks or so? When d when are you thinking of going up to, uh, OGI? PhD D: Yeah, like, uh, not next week but maybe the week after. Professor B: OK. Good. So at least we 'll have one meeting with <unk>vocalsound<unk> yo with you still around, and <unk>disfmarker<unk> and <unk>disfmarker<unk> PhD D: Uh - huh. Professor B: That's good. PhD D: Um, Yeah. Well, <unk>vocalsound<unk> maybe we can start with this. Mmm. Professor B: All today, huh? PhD D: Yeah. Professor B: Oh. PhD D: Um. Yeah. So there was this conference call this morning, um, and the only topic on the agenda was just to discuss a and to come at <unk>disfmarker<unk> uh, to get a decision about this latency problem. Professor B: No, this <unk>disfmarker<unk> I'm sorry, this is a conference call between different Aurora people or just <unk>disfmarker<unk>? PhD D: Uh, yeah. It's the conference call between the Aurora, <unk>vocalsound<unk> uh, group. Professor B: It's the main conference call. OK. PhD D: Uh, yeah. There were like two hours of
  Question: What did the Professor think about LPC?
  Answer:
output: The professor thought the LPC had two problems. It was adding degradation and there was an issue with pitch. The professor also expressed that the LPC was throwing away information that was useful.