input: Text: Grad A: OK. We seem to be recording. Professor G: Alright! Grad A: So, sorry about not <unk>disfmarker<unk> Professor G: We're not crashing. PhD D: Number four. Grad A: not pre - doing everything. The lunch went a little later than I was expecting, Chuck. PhD E: Hmm? Professor G: OK. PhD B: Chuck was telling too many jokes, or something? Grad A: Yep. Pretty much. PhD E: Yeah. Professor G: OK. <unk>vocalsound<unk> Does anybody have an agenda? Grad A: No. Postdoc F: Well, I'm <unk>disfmarker<unk> I sent a couple of items. They're <unk>disfmarker<unk> they're sort of practical. Professor G: I thought <unk>pause<unk> somebody had. Postdoc F: I don't know if you're <unk>disfmarker<unk> Professor G: Yeah, that's right. Postdoc F: if <unk>disfmarker<unk> if that's too practical for what we're <unk>pause<unk> focused on. Grad A: I mean, we don't want anything too practical. Professor G: Yeah, we only want th useless things. Grad A: Yeah, that would be <unk>disfmarker<unk> Professor G: Yeah. No, why don't we talk about practical things? Postdoc F: OK. Professor G: Sure. Postdoc F: Well, um, I can <unk>pause<unk> give you an update on the <unk>pause<unk> transcription effort. Professor G: Great. Postdoc F: Uh, maybe <unk>nonvocalsound<unk> raise the issue of microphone, uh, um procedures with reference to the <unk>pause<unk> cleanliness of the recordings. Professor G: OK, transcription, uh, microphone issues <unk>disfmarker<unk> Postdoc F: And then maybe <unk>nonvocalsound<unk> ask,
  Question: What did Speaker F state about the transcriber tool?
  Answer:
output: Recent modifications to the Transcriber tool allow transcribers to listen to speech from different channels, as well as helping to preserve portions of overlapping speech, and enabling the creation of different output files for each channel for a cleaner and more segmentable transcript.