input: Text: Grad C: Hmm. Testing channel two. Grad E: Two, two. Grad C: Two. Grad E: Two. Oh. Grad D: Hello? Grad B: Hmm? Yeah Thank You. OK Well, so Ralf and Tilman are here. Professor F: OK. Great. Great. Grad B: Made it safely. Professor F: So the <unk>disfmarker<unk> what w we h have been doing i they would like us all to read these digits. But we don't all read them but a couple people read them. PhD A: OK. Professor F: Uh, wanna give them all with German accents today or <unk>disfmarker<unk>? Grad B: Sure. Professor F: OK. Grad B: OK and the way you do it is you just read the numbers not as uh each single, so just like I do it. PhD A: Mm - hmm. Grad B: OK. First you read the transcript number. Turn. Grad D: OK, uh <unk>disfmarker<unk> What's <unk>disfmarker<unk> Professor F: OK. Let's be done with this. PhD A: OK. Professor F: OK. this is Ami, who <unk>disfmarker<unk> And this is Tilman and Ralf. PhD A: Hi. Uh - huh. Nice to meet you. Grad D: Hi. Professor F: Hi. OK. So we're gonna try to finish by five so people who want to can go hear Nancy Chang's talk, uh downstairs. PhD A: Hmm. Professor F: And you guys are g giving talks on tomorrow and Wednesday lunch times, PhD A: Yes. Grad D: Mmm. Professor F: right? That's great. OK so, do y do you know what we're gonna do? Grad B: I thought two things uh we 'll introduce ourselves and what we do
  Question: What was discussed in the meeting?
  Answer:
output: The group discussed plans and concerns regarding the architecture of SmartKom, its proposed modules, and the types of interactions expected to take place between modules. The meeting was largely focused on SmartKom's decision making capacity and how to adapt this functionality to the tourist information domain. The group set a date for assessing SmartKom plans.