input: Text: Professor D: OK. So, uh You can fill those out, uh <unk>pause<unk> after, actually, so So, I got, uh <unk>pause<unk> these results from, uh, Stephane. Also, um, I think that, uh <unk>pause<unk> um <unk>pause<unk> we might hear later today, about other results. I think s that, uh, there were some other very good results that we're gonna wanna compare to. But, <unk>vocalsound<unk> r our results from other <unk>disfmarker<unk> other places, yeah. PhD A: I I'm sorry? I didn't Professor D: Um, I got this from you PhD A: Yeah. Professor D: and then I sent a note to Sunil about the <unk>disfmarker<unk> cuz he has been running some other systems PhD A: Mm - hmm. Professor D: other than the <unk>disfmarker<unk> the ICSI OGI one. PhD A: Oh yeah. Professor D: So <unk>pause<unk> um, I wan wanna <unk>disfmarker<unk> wanna see what that is. But, uh, you know, so we 'll see what it is comparatively later. But <unk>pause<unk> it looks like, um PhD A: M yeah. Professor D: You know most of the time, even <unk>disfmarker<unk> I mean even though it's true that the overall number for Danish <unk>disfmarker<unk> we didn't improve it If you look at it individually, what it really says is that there's, um, uh Looks like out of the six cases, between the different kinds of, uh, matching conditions <unk>pause<unk> out of the six cases, there's basically, um, a couple where it stays about the same, uh, three where it gets better, and one where it gets worse. PhD A
  Question: What did PhD C and the professor discuss about multiple languages?
  Answer:
output: PhD C and the professor expressed a desire to learn more about nets that incorporated multiple languages. They thought they could explore whether it was better to have one net for many languages or different nets for each language.