input: Text: Professor D: OK. PhD A: Mike. Mike - one? PhD B: Ah. Professor D: We're on? Yes, please. I mean, we're testing noise robustness but let's not get silly. OK, so, uh, you've got some, uh, Xerox things to pass out? PhD A: Yeah, Professor D: That are <unk>disfmarker<unk> PhD A: um. Professor D: Yeah. PhD A: Yeah. Yeah, I'm sorry for the table, but as it grows in size, uh, it. Professor D: Uh, so for th the last column we use our imagination. OK. PhD B: Ah, yeah. Professor D: Ah. PhD A: Uh, yeah. PhD B: Uh, do you want @ @. Professor D: This one's nice, though. This has nice big font. PhD A: Yeah. Grad C: Let's see. Yeah. Chop! Professor D: Yeah. PhD A: So Professor D: When you get older you have these different perspectives. I mean, lowering the word hour rate is fine, but having big font! PhD A: Next time we will put colors or something. Professor D: That's what's <unk>disfmarker<unk> PhD A: Uh. Professor D: Yeah. It's mostly big font. OK. PhD A: OK, s so there is kind of summary of what has been done <unk>disfmarker<unk> Professor D: Uh <unk>disfmarker<unk> Go ahead. PhD A: It's this. Summary of experiments since, well, since last week Professor D: Oh. OK. PhD A: and also since the <unk>disfmarker<unk> we've started to run <unk>disfmarker<unk> work on this. Um. <unk>pause<unk> So since last week we've started to fill
  Question: Summarize the discussion on future directions
  Answer:
output: The team discussed testing a multi-band approach that is more resistance to noise. The professor thought that it many not be a bad idea to put together several MLP's to improve performance. The team also thought that there might be problems with the pronunciation models.