input: Text: Professor B: I think for two years we were two months, uh, away from being done. PhD A: And what was that, Morgan? What project? Professor B: Uh, the, uh, TORRENT chip. PhD A: Oh. Professor B: Yeah. We were two <unk>disfmarker<unk> we were <unk>disfmarker<unk> PhD C: Yeah. Professor B: Uh, uh, we went through it <unk>disfmarker<unk> Jim and I went through old emails at one point and <unk>disfmarker<unk> and for two years there was this thing saying, yeah, we're <unk>disfmarker<unk> we're two months away from being done. It was very <unk>disfmarker<unk> very believable schedules, too. I mean, we went through and <unk>disfmarker<unk> with the schedules <unk>disfmarker<unk> and we <unk>disfmarker<unk> PhD A: It was true for two years. Professor B: Yeah. Oh, yeah. It was very true. PhD A: So, should we just do the same kind of deal where we <unk>pause<unk> go around and do, uh, status report <unk>pause<unk> kind of things? OK. And I guess when Sunil gets here he can do his last or something. So. Professor B: Yeah. So we <unk>pause<unk> probably should wait for him to come before we do his. PhD C: Mm - hmm. PhD A: OK. That's a good idea. Professor B: Yeah. Grad F: OK. Professor B: Yeah. PhD A: Any objection? Do y OK, M Professor B: All in favor PhD A: Do you want to start, Morgan? Do you have anything, or <unk>disfmarker<unk>? Professor B: Uh, I don't do anything. I <unk>disfmarker<unk> No, I mean, I <unk>d
  Question: Summarize the discussion on mean subtraction in SRI
  Answer:
output: The team got an improvement on the SRI system for TI- digits and Meeting Recorder digits but near mic performance worsened. The team explored the reasons for this difference. The professor suggested getting rid of low energy sections. The team also discussed how more nuanced normalization approaches could improve task performance.