input: Text: Grad A: OK, we're on. Professor B: Yeah. Grad A: So, I think this is gonna be a pretty short meeting because I have four agenda items, three of them were requested by Jane who is not gonna be at the meeting today. So. <unk>vocalsound<unk> The uh first was transcription status. Does anyone besides Jane know what the transcription status is? PhD F: Um, sort of, I do, peripherally. PhD C: Is that English? PhD F: Um <unk>disfmarker<unk> Well first of all with IBM I got a note from Brian yesterday saying that they finally made the tape for the thing that we sent them a <unk>pause<unk> week or week and a half ago PhD D: That's our system. Grad A: Ugh! PhD F: and that it's gone out to the transcribers and hopefully next week we 'll have the transcription back from that. Grad A: C can I have a pen? PhD F: Um <unk>disfmarker<unk> Jane seems to be um moving right along on the transcriptions from the ICSI side. She's assigned, I think probably five or six m more meetings. PhD C: Yeah, I think we're up to MR thirteen or something. PhD D: Mmm. PhD F: Yeah, so um, I guess she's hired some new transcribers PhD D: Speaking <unk>disfmarker<unk> Grad E: Which meetings is she transcribing? PhD F: and <unk>disfmarker<unk> Um well we've <unk>disfmarker<unk> we've run out of E D Us because a certain number of them are um, sort of awaiting to go to IBM. Grad E: OK. PhD C: For IBM, yeah. PhD D: Hmm. Grad E: OK. PhD F: and the rest are in process being transcribed uh here. PhD D: So does she have transcribers right now who are basically sitting idle because there '
  Question: What did the professor think about scheduling meetings going forward?
  Answer:
output: The professor polled the group on how many people would not be interested in meetings on recognition. He thought that they should at least try the smaller meetings and see what happens.