The prior knowledge about the rhetorical structure of scientific abstracts is useful for various text-mining tasks such as information extraction, information retrieval, and automatic summarization. This paper presents a novel approach to categorize sentences in scientific abstracts into four sections, objective, methods, results, and conclusions. METHOD: Formalizing the categorization task as a sequential labeling problem, we employ Conditional Random Fields (CRFs) to annotate section labels into abstract sentences. The training corpus is acquired automatically from Medline abstracts. RESULTS: The proposed method outperformed the previous approaches, achieving 95.5% per-sentence accuracy and 68.8% per-abstract accuracy. CONCLUSION: The experimental results showed that CRFs could model the rhetorical structure of abstracts more suitably.
REF showed a similar system using CRFs to classify the abstract sentences into four categories: objective, methods, results, and conclusions.
Identifying Sections in Scientific Abstracts using Conditional Random Fields
Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing
Computer Science