We propose a new segmentation evaluation metric, called segmentation similarity (S), that quantifies the similarity between two segmentations as the proportion of boundaries that are not transformed when comparing them using edit distance, essentially using edit distance as a penalty function and scaling penalties by segmentation size. We propose several adapted inter-annotator agreement coefficients which use S that are suitable for segmentation. We show that S is configurable enough to suit a wide variety of segmentation evaluations, and is an improvement upon the state of the art. We also propose using inter-annotator agreement coefficients to evaluate automatic segmenters in terms of human performance.
In REF , authors proposed a different approach called segmentation similarity that quantifies the similarity between two segmentations as the proportion of boundaries that are not transformed when comparing them using editing distance.
Segmentation Similarity and Agreement
NAACL
Computer Science