Virtualization is growing rapidly as a result of the increasing number of alternative solutions in this area, and of the wide range of application field. Until now, hypervisor-based virtualization has been the de facto solution to perform server virtualization. Recently, container-based virtualization -an alternative to hypervisors -has gained more attention because of lightweight characteristics, attracting cloud providers that have already made use of it to deliver their services. However, a gap in the existing research on containers exists in the area of power consumption. This paper presents the results of a performance comparison in terms of power consumption of four different virtualization technologies: KVM and Xen, which are based on hypervisor virtualization, Docker and LXC which are based on container virtualization. The aim of this empirical investigation, carried out by means of a testbed, is to understand how these technologies react to particular workloads. Our initial results show how, despite of the number of virtual entities running, both kinds of virtualization alternatives behave similarly in idle state and in CPU/Memory stress test. Contrarily, the results on network performance show differences between the two technologies.
Ref. REF compares hypervisor-based virtualization (Xen, KVM, etc.) and container-based virtualization (Docker, LXC, etc.) in terms of power consumption.
Power Consumption of Virtualization Technologies: An Empirical Investigation
2015 IEEE/ACM 8th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC)
2015 IEEE/ACM 8th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC)
Computer Science