In this position paper we discuss a set of problems particular to computing within limits that draws on psychological and sociological barriers. The enormity of the predicaments we are facing, global climate change and resource scarcity, together with the social, cultural and national settings in which we are facing these predicaments, are seriously hampering our possibility to address them. We argue that without confronting the underlying psychology that perpetuates our current state of un-sustainability, there is little computing can hope to achieve. Furthermore, we also argue that these psychological limits to computing do not only concern the users of our systems, often portrayed as the people in need of behavioral change, but also ourselves, as researchers within computing. In this paper we start exploring what these psychological limits could be, what ideas computing for sustainability has tried but should now retire, and start discussing a way forward.
We also see the problem that Knowles and Eriksson REF address when they argue that without confronting the underlying psychology that perpetuates our limited understanding of the predicaments we are facing at a global level, "there is little computing can hope to achieve [as] these psychological limits to computing do not only concern the users of our systems […] , but also ourselves, as researchers within computing".
Deviant and guilt-ridden: Computing within psychological limits
First Monday
First Monday
Sociology Computer Science