Consumers' purchase decisions are increasingly influenced by user-generated online reviews [3] . Accordingly, there has been growing concern about the potential for posting deceptive opinion spam-fictitious reviews that have been deliberately written to sound authentic, to deceive the reader [15] . But while this practice has received considerable public attention and concern, relatively little is known about the actual prevalence, or rate, of deception in online review communities, and less still about the factors that influence it. We propose a generative model of deception which, in conjunction with a deception classifier [15], we use to explore the prevalence of deception in six popular online review communities: Expedia, Hotels.com, Orbitz, Priceline, TripAdvisor, and Yelp. We additionally propose a theoretical model of online reviews based on economic signaling theory [18] , in which consumer reviews diminish the inherent information asymmetry between consumers and producers, by acting as a signal to a product's true, unknown quality. We find that deceptive opinion spam is a growing problem overall, but with different growth rates across communities. These rates, we argue, are driven by the different signaling costs associated with deception for each review community, e.g., posting requirements. When measures are taken to increase signaling cost, e.g., filtering reviews written by first-time reviewers, deception prevalence is effectively reduced.
REF expand upon this work to estimate prevalences of deception in a review community.
Estimating the Prevalence of Deception in Online Review Communities
ArXiv
ArXiv
Computer Science