Opinion mining is a recent subdiscipline of computational linguistics which is concerned not with the topic a document is about, but with the opinion it expresses. To aid the extraction of opinions from text, recent work has tackled the issue of determining the orientation of "subjective" terms contained in text, i.e. deciding whether a term that carries opinionated content has a positive or a negative connotation. This is believed to be of key importance for identifying the orientation of documents, i.e. determining whether a document expresses a positive or negative opinion about its subject matter. We contend that the plain determination of the orientation of terms is not a realistic problem, since it starts from the nonrealistic assumption that we already know whether a term is subjective or not; this would imply that a linguistic resource that marks terms as "subjective" or "objective" is available, which is usually not the case. In this paper we confront the task of deciding whether a given term has a positive connotation, or a negative connotation, or has no subjective connotation at all; this problem thus subsumes the problem of determining subjectivity and the problem of determining orientation. We tackle this problem by testing three different variants of a semi-supervised method previously proposed for orientation detection. Our results show that determining subjectivity and orientation is a much harder problem than determining orientation alone.
Esuli and Sebastiani REF tried to determine the sentiment orientation of a subjective sentence by the use of the glosses of terms in a semi-supervised classification.
Determining Term Subjectivity And Term Orientation For Opinion Mining
Conference Of The European Association For Computational Linguistics
Computer Science