Public debate functions as a forum for both expressing and forming opinions, an important aspect of public life. We present results for automatically classifying posts in online debate as to the position, or STANCE that the speaker takes on an issue, such as Pro or Con. We show that representing the dialogic structure of the debates in terms of agreement relations between speakers, greatly improves performance for stance classification, over models that operate on post content and parentpost context alone.
REF focused on capturing the dialogic structure between posts in terms of agreement relations between speakers.
Stance Classification using Dialogic Properties of Persuasion
NAACL
Computer Science