Argumentation is an essential feature of scientific language. We present an annotation study resulting in a corpus of scientific publications annotated with argumentative components and relations. The argumentative annotations have been added to the existing Dr. Inventor Corpus, already annotated for four other rhetorical aspects. We analyze the annotated argumentative structures and investigate the relations between argumentation and other rhetorical aspects of scientific writing, such as discourse roles and citation contexts.
REF analyze the information shared by rhetorical and argumentative structure of scientific documents.
An argument-annotated corpus of scientific publications
ArgMining@EMNLP
Computer Science