Abstract. In observational studies, propensity scores are commonly estimated by maximum likelihood but may fail to balance high-dimensional pre-treatment covariates even after specification search. We introduce a general framework that unifies and generalizes several recent proposals to improve covariate balance when designing an observational study. Instead of the likelihood function, we propose to optimize special loss functions-covariate balancing scoring rules (CBSR)-to estimate the propensity score. A CBSR is uniquely determined by the link function in the GLM and the estimand (a weighted average treatment effect). We show CBSR does not lose asymptotic efficiency to the Bernoulli likelihood in estimating the weighted average treatment effect compared, but CBSR is much more robust in finite sample. Borrowing tools developed in statistical learning, we propose practical strategies to balance covariate functions in rich function classes. This is useful to estimate the maximum bias of the inverse probability weighting (IPW) estimators and construct honest confidence interval in finite sample. Lastly, we provide several numerical examples to demonstrate the trade-off of bias and variance in the IPW-type estimators and the trade-off in balancing different function classes of the covariates.
In another recent work, REF proposed a generalized covariate balancing method based on a class of scoring rules.
Covariate Balancing Propensity Score by Tailored Loss Functions
arXiv: Methodology
Mathematics